{ "suites": [ { "label": "ADAPTER", "model": "./models/qwen3.6-35b", "adapter": "./lora-adapters", "passed": 11, "total": 20, "pass_rate": 0.55, "results": [ { "id": "B01", "category": "impact_analysis", "prompt": "In a TypeScript project, symbol 'AuthService' has 15 dependents. What is the risk level of modifying it?", "answer": "Here's a thinking process:\n\n1. **Analyze User Input:**\n - **Symbol:** AuthService\n - **Dependents:** 15\n - **Question:** What is the risk level of modifying it?\n\n2. **Identify Key Concepts:**\n - \"Dependents\" means modules/files that directly depend on AuthService.\n - 15 dependents is high risk to modify.\n - Need to consider best practices for assessing modification risk.\n\n3. **Determine Risk Level:**\n - High risk. Changes carry high potential for breaking changes.\n - Requires careful impact analysis, integration testing, and possibly phased rollout.\n\n4. **Formulate Response:**\n - State clearly that 15 dependents indicates high risk.\n - Explain why: any change to its interface or signature requires updates in each dependent.\n - Recommend mitigation strategies: impact analysis, integration tests, feature flags, gradual rollout.\n - Keep it concise and actionable.\n\n5. **Self-Correction/Refinement:**\n - Is 15 always high? Yes, in most codebases. Could be medium if modules are", "expected_keywords": [ "HIGH", "15", "dependents", "coordinate", "review" ], "hit": [ "HIGH", "15", "dependents" ], "missing": [ "coordinate", "review" ], "score": 0.6, "passed": true, "elapsed_s": 13.62, "error": null }, { "id": "B02", "category": "dead_code", "prompt": "A Python codebase has health score 58/100 with 23 dead code candidates. What should the team prioritize?", "answer": "\n\n\n\nWith a score of 58/100, the codebase is in critical condition. 23 dead code candidates indicate cleanup opportunities that would improve maintainability. The team should audit each systematically.", "expected_keywords": [ "dead code", "audit", "health", "cleanup", "batch" ], "hit": [ "dead code", "audit", "cleanup" ], "missing": [ "health", "batch" ], "score": 0.6, "passed": true, "elapsed_s": 5.9, "error": null }, { "id": "B03", "category": "blast_radius", "prompt": "Symbol 'DatabaseConnection' has 31 dependents in a Go project. Is it safe to change its interface?", "answer": "Here's a thinking process:\n\n1. **Analyze User Query:**\n - **Symbol:** 'DatabaseConnection'\n - **Dependents:** 31\n - **Language:** Go\n - **Question:** Is it safe to change its interface?\n\n2. **Identify Key Concepts:**\n - Interface changes in Go\n - Impact of 31 dependents\n - Breaking vs. non-breaking changes\n - Migration strategies\n - Best practices for interface evolution\n\n3. **Assess Risk Level:**\n - 31 dependents is high risk to modify directly.\n - Any change to its interface or signature requires updates in each dependent.\n - Need to determine if the change is backward-compatible first.\n\n4. **Determine What Changes Are Safe vs. Unsafe:**\n - **Safe (backward-compatible):** Adding new methods, changing return types to more specific types (if covariant), adding optional parameters (not directly applicable in Go), making methods less restrictive.\n - **Unsafe (breaking):** Removing methods, changing method signatures, changing parameter types, changing return types to incompatible ones.\n\n5. **Formulate", "expected_keywords": [ "CRITICAL", "31", "coordinated", "plan", "release" ], "hit": [ "31" ], "missing": [ "CRITICAL", "coordinated", "plan", "release" ], "score": 0.2, "passed": false, "elapsed_s": 11.2, "error": null }, { "id": "B04", "category": "impact_analysis", "prompt": "In a JavaScript project, symbol 'Router' is being modified. What symbols are directly affected?", "answer": "Here's a thinking process:\n\n1. **Analyze User Input:**\n - **Symbol being modified:** 'Router'\n - **Question:** What symbols are directly affected?\n - **Context:** JavaScript project\n\n2. **Identify Key Concepts:**\n - \"Router\" is a symbol being modified. What does modifying a Router typically involve?\n - In JavaScript/Node.js projects, a Router is usually a class or object that handles routing logic (e.g., Express Router, Fastify Router, or a custom router).\n - Modifying it directly affects any symbol that depends on it. These are typically:\n - Classes that extend Router\n - Objects that instantiate Router\n - Functions that call Router methods\n - Other modules that import/require Router\n - Without specific codebase context, I need to give a general but precise answer about direct dependencies.\n\n3. **Determine Direct Dependencies:**\n - Any symbol that directly uses 'Router' is directly affected. This includes:\n - `Router.use()` calls\n - `Router.get()`, `Router.post()`, etc.\n - Any middleware attached to Router\n -", "expected_keywords": [ "depend", "Router", "interface", "dependents", "review" ], "hit": [ "depend", "Router" ], "missing": [ "interface", "dependents", "review" ], "score": 0.4, "passed": false, "elapsed_s": 10.99, "error": null }, { "id": "B05", "category": "hotspot", "prompt": "A TypeScript symbol has 25 dependents and 4 dependencies. What does this indicate architecturally?", "answer": "These dependents are high-risk components. Any change to its interface or signature requires careful impact analysis. This pattern typically indicates a shared utility, base class, or infrastructure module. Consider adding integration tests before modifying it.", "expected_keywords": [ "critical", "centrality", "25", "core", "impact analysis" ], "hit": [ "impact analysis" ], "missing": [ "critical", "centrality", "25", "core" ], "score": 0.2, "passed": false, "elapsed_s": 5.91, "error": null }, { "id": "B06", "category": "health", "prompt": "A Python codebase has health score 88/100 with 2 dead code candidates. Assess the architecture.", "answer": "Here's a thinking process:\n\n1. **Analyze User Input:**\n - **Score:** 88/100 (high quality)\n - **Dead code candidates:** 2\n - **Task:** Assess the architecture\n\n2. **Identify Key Components of Architecture Assessment:**\n - Structure & Organization\n - Separation of Concerns\n - Modularity & Reusability\n - Error Handling & Logging\n - Testing Coverage\n - Documentation & Type Hints\n - Performance & Scalability\n - Security & Compliance\n - Maintainability & Extensibility\n\n3. **Map Score & Dead Code to Architecture:**\n - Score 88/100 indicates strong architectural patterns\n - 2 dead code candidates suggest cleanup opportunities that would improve maintainability\n - Recommendation: Maintain current practices and consider this codebase a reference architecture\n\n4. **Structure the Assessment:**\n - Executive Summary\n - Strengths (inferred from score 88/100)\n - Areas for Improvement (addressing the 2 dead code candidates)\n - Recommendations\n - Conclusion\n\n5.", "expected_keywords": [ "strong", "88", "reference", "maintain", "practices" ], "hit": [ "strong", "88", "reference", "maintain", "practices" ], "missing": [], "score": 1.0, "passed": true, "elapsed_s": 11.2, "error": null }, { "id": "B07", "category": "health", "prompt": "A Go codebase has health score 45/100 with 40 dead code candidates. Assess the architecture.", "answer": "Here's a thinking process:\n\n1. **Analyze User Input:**\n - **Language:** Go\n - **Health Score:** 45/100 (low)\n - **Dead Code Candidates:** 40\n - **Task:** Assess the architecture\n\n2. **Identify Key Issues from the Score:**\n - Score 45/100 indicates significant architectural/quality problems.\n - 40 dead code candidates suggest cleanup opportunities that would improve maintainability and reduce cognitive load.\n - Need to infer common architectural patterns that would lead to this score.\n\n3. **Brainstorm Common Architectural Problems in Go Codebases with Score 45/100:**\n - High coupling between modules\n - Circular dependencies\n - God files/modules (too many responsibilities in single files)\n - Inconsistent error handling\n - Missing interfaces/abstractions leading to tight coupling\n - Over-fragmentation or over-organization (too many small files that don't make sense)\n - Missing tests or poor test coverage\n - Inconsistent naming conventions\n - Missing configuration management\n - Hardcoded values instead", "expected_keywords": [ "weak", "45", "review", "technical debt", "immediate" ], "hit": [ "45" ], "missing": [ "weak", "review", "technical debt", "immediate" ], "score": 0.2, "passed": false, "elapsed_s": 11.23, "error": null }, { "id": "B08", "category": "crosslang", "prompt": "A codebase has 12 cross-language edges detected between components. What does this indicate?", "answer": "Here's a thinking process:\n\n1. **Understand User Query**: The user states: \"A codebase has 12 cross-language edges detected between components. What does this indicate?\" This is a software architecture/dependency analysis question. Cross-language edges mean components written in different languages are directly coupled. 12 such edges suggest integration points that need careful management.\n\n2. **Define Key Terms**:\n - *Cross-language edges*: Dependencies or interfaces between components written in different programming languages.\n - *Components*: Modular units of the codebase (services, modules, libraries, etc.).\n - *12 edges*: A specific count indicating integration points.\n\n3. **Identify Core Implications**:\n - Integration complexity increases\n - Testing surface area grows\n - Deployment boundaries need careful design\n - Potential for tight coupling if not abstracted properly\n - May indicate a polyglot architecture (intentional or accidental)\n - Each edge should be documented and ideally wrapped in a stable interface contract\n\n4. **Structure the Response**:\n - Start with a clear, direct answer\n - Break down implications into categories (architectural, operational", "expected_keywords": [ "12", "cross-language", "coupling", "contract", "REST" ], "hit": [ "12", "cross-language", "coupling", "contract" ], "missing": [ "REST" ], "score": 0.8, "passed": true, "elapsed_s": 11.16, "error": null }, { "id": "B09", "category": "file_ratio", "prompt": "A TypeScript project has 40 files and 1200 symbols. What does a ratio of 30 symbols per file suggest?", "answer": "These symbols are likely functions, classes, interfaces, or variables. A ratio of 30 symbols per file indicates reasonable file organization with moderate complexity per file. Tracking this ratio over time helps detect when individual files are growing too complex and need decomposition.", "expected_keywords": [ "high complexity", "split", "large files", "modules", "decomposition" ], "hit": [ "decomposition" ], "missing": [ "high complexity", "split", "large files", "modules" ], "score": 0.2, "passed": false, "elapsed_s": 5.98, "error": null }, { "id": "B10", "category": "edge_density", "prompt": "A Python codebase has 500 symbols and 2000 dependency edges giving a density of 4.0 edges per symbol. What does this suggest architecturally?", "answer": "These edges per symbol suggest high coupling \u2014 consider splitting large modules into smaller focused modules.", "expected_keywords": [ "high coupling", "4", "dependency injection", "abstraction", "testability" ], "hit": [ "high coupling" ], "missing": [ "4", "dependency injection", "abstraction", "testability" ], "score": 0.2, "passed": false, "elapsed_s": 5.18, "error": null }, { "id": "B11", "category": "hotspot_process", "prompt": "Before modifying a Go symbol with 18 dependents, what steps should a developer take?", "answer": "Here's a thinking process:\n\n1. **Understand the User's Query:** The user is asking about the steps a developer should take before modifying a Go symbol that has 18 dependents. This is a high-risk change that requires careful planning and execution.\n\n2. **Identify Key Concepts:**\n - Go symbol with 18 dependents\n - High-risk modification\n - Steps to take before modifying\n - Best practices for safe refactoring\n\n3. **Determine Core Steps:** What should a developer do?\n - Identify all affected modules/packages\n - Check for existing tests covering each dependent\n - Write integration tests for any untested dependents\n - Consider making the change backward-compatible first\n - Deploy to staging/production incrementally\n - Monitor before full rollout\n - Document the change\n - Get code review from maintainers of each dependent\n\n4. **Structure the Response:** Organize the steps logically:\n - Phase 1: Discovery & Impact Analysis\n - Phase 2: Risk Mitigation & Testing\n - Phase 3: Controlled Rollout & Monitoring\n - Phase 4: Documentation & Communication", "expected_keywords": [ "impact analysis", "18", "tests", "integration", "backward-compatible" ], "hit": [ "impact analysis", "18", "tests", "integration", "backward-compatible" ], "missing": [], "score": 1.0, "passed": true, "elapsed_s": 10.92, "error": null }, { "id": "B12", "category": "comparison", "prompt": "Compare two Python codebases: one with health score 55/100 and edge density 3.5, another with score 85/100 and density 1.2. What structural differences would you expect?", "answer": "These codebases differ significantly in structure. The healthier codebase (85/100, density 1.2) would have more modular design with cleaner separation of concerns, fewer circular dependencies, and more focused single-responsibility modules. The current codebase (score 55/100, density 3.5) likely has more tightly coupled modules, higher fan-in on core components, and more opportunities for interface extraction. Improving density from 3.5 to 1.2 typically requires introducing abstraction layers between high-coupling components.", "expected_keywords": [ "modular", "coupled", "separation", "abstraction", "circular" ], "hit": [ "modular", "coupled", "separation", "abstraction", "circular" ], "missing": [], "score": 1.0, "passed": true, "elapsed_s": 7.77, "error": null }, { "id": "B13", "category": "refactor", "prompt": "A JavaScript codebase has a symbol with 22 dependents that needs to be split into smaller modules. What is the recommended approach?", "answer": "Here's a thinking process:\n\n1. **Analyze User Query:**\n - **Context:** JavaScript codebase\n - **Problem:** A symbol has 22 dependents and needs to be split into smaller modules\n - **Question:** What is the recommended approach?\n\n2. **Identify Key Concepts:**\n - Symbol with 22 dependents \u2192 high-centrality node, likely a core component/module\n - Splitting into smaller modules \u2192 modularization, decomposition\n - Recommended approach \u2192 best practices for refactoring high-centrality modules\n\n3. **Determine Core Principles:**\n - Don't split a high-centrality module in one large PR\n - Identify logical groupings within the symbol's responsibilities\n - Extract each group into a new focused module\n - Create a facade or re-export from the original location to maintain backward compatibility\n - Migrate dependents one by one to import directly from the new modules\n - Remove the facade only after all 22 dependents have been migrated\n - This prevents breaking changes from propagating across the entire codebase simultaneously\n\n4. **Formulate Recommendation Steps:**\n a.", "expected_keywords": [ "phased", "facade", "22", "backward compatibility", "migrate" ], "hit": [ "facade", "22", "backward compatibility", "migrate" ], "missing": [ "phased" ], "score": 0.8, "passed": true, "elapsed_s": 11.21, "error": null }, { "id": "B14", "category": "blast_radius", "prompt": "The graph shows 8 files depend on 'ConfigLoader'. What is the blast radius of changing it?", "answer": "Here's a thinking process:\n\n1. **Analyze User Input:**\n - **Statement:** \"The graph shows 8 files depend on 'ConfigLoader'. What is the blast radius of changing it?\"\n - **Key Elements:** \n - 8 files depend on 'ConfigLoader'\n - Question: What is the blast radius of changing it?\n - **Context Missing:** The user mentions \"the graph\" but hasn't provided it. I need to acknowledge this and ask for clarification or make reasonable assumptions based on standard software engineering practices.\n\n2. **Identify Core Concepts:**\n - **Blast Radius:** In software engineering, this refers to the potential impact of a change to a component/module. It includes direct dependents, transitive dependents, and any affected modules.\n - **8 Dependents:** This is a moderate-centrality node. Changes carry moderate risk and require careful impact analysis.\n - **ConfigLoader:** Likely a core component that loads configuration files. Changes could affect logging, error handling, default values, format parsing, etc.\n\n3. **Formulate Response Strategy:**\n - Acknowledge the missing graph\n - Define", "expected_keywords": [ "8", "MODERATE", "blast radius", "dependents", "review" ], "hit": [ "8", "MODERATE", "blast radius", "dependents" ], "missing": [ "review" ], "score": 0.8, "passed": true, "elapsed_s": 11.01, "error": null }, { "id": "B15", "category": "change_safety", "prompt": "A symbol 'legacyHelper' is being removed from a TypeScript project. 0 other symbols import it. Is this change safe?", "answer": "Here's a thinking process:\n\n1. **Analyze User Input:**\n - **Symbol being removed:** 'legacyHelper'\n - **Import count:** 0 other symbols import it\n - **Question:** Is this change safe?\n\n2. **Identify Key Factors for Safety:**\n - Removing a symbol that has 0 dependencies is generally safe.\n - Need to check for:\n - Direct usage (not just imports)\n - Side effects from module initialization\n - Type exports that might be used elsewhere\n - Runtime code that might be directly called\n - Configuration files or build scripts that reference it\n - Documentation or comments that might need updates\n - Since it's a TypeScript project, consider:\n - Type-only exports\n - Interface/class definitions that might be extended\n - Decorators or other code generation patterns\n\n3. **Formulate Response:**\n - Start with a clear answer: Yes, it's safe to remove.\n - Explain why: 0 dependencies means nothing calls it directly.\n - List caveats/verification steps:\n - Search for direct usage (not imports)\n - Check", "expected_keywords": [ "SAFE", "no symbols", "import", "remove", "legacyHelper" ], "hit": [ "SAFE", "import", "remove", "legacyHelper" ], "missing": [ "no symbols" ], "score": 0.8, "passed": true, "elapsed_s": 11.21, "error": null }, { "id": "B16", "category": "change_safety", "prompt": "A symbol 'PaymentGateway' is being removed from a Python project. 7 other symbols import it. Is this change safe?", "answer": "Here's a thinking process:\n\n1. **Understand the User's Question:** The user is asking about removing a symbol named 'PaymentGateway' from a Python project. 7 other symbols import it. They want to know if this change is safe.\n\n2. **Identify Key Factors:** \n - What does \"safe\" mean in this context? It means the change won't break existing functionality.\n - 7 symbols import 'PaymentGateway'. What does that imply? Any change to its interface or signature requires updates in each of these 7 dependents.\n - What kind of change is being made? The user says \"removed\", which could mean:\n a) Deleting the symbol entirely\n b) Renaming it\n c) Changing its interface/signature\n d) Moving it to a different module\n - Without knowing the exact change, I can't give a definitive yes/no. I need to explain the conditions under which it would be safe or unsafe.\n\n3. **Determine What Makes a Change Safe:**\n - If the symbol is a class, function, or variable that is directly affected, all 7 dependents must be updated.", "expected_keywords": [ "UNSAFE", "7", "import", "deprecate", "break" ], "hit": [ "UNSAFE", "7", "import", "break" ], "missing": [ "deprecate" ], "score": 0.8, "passed": true, "elapsed_s": 10.96, "error": null }, { "id": "B17", "category": "drift", "prompt": "A Go codebase has health score 52/100. 18 dead code candidates exist. What architectural drift does this suggest?", "answer": "These 18 dead code candidates indicate architectural drift toward a monolithic structure with high coupling. The team should prioritize refactoring high-centrality modules and reducing circular dependencies.", "expected_keywords": [ "active", "drift", "technical debt", "dead code", "review" ], "hit": [ "drift", "dead code" ], "missing": [ "active", "technical debt", "review" ], "score": 0.4, "passed": false, "elapsed_s": 5.63, "error": null }, { "id": "B18", "category": "security", "prompt": "A TypeScript codebase has 800 symbols and 1500 dependency edges. A vulnerability is found in a symbol with 22 dependents. What is the exposure level?", "answer": "Here's a thinking process:\n\n1. **Understand the User's Query:**\n - The user provides a TypeScript codebase with 800 symbols and 1500 dependency edges.\n - A vulnerability is found in a symbol with 22 dependents.\n - The question asks: \"What is the exposure level?\"\n\n2. **Identify Key Concepts:**\n - \"Exposure level\" typically refers to how widely a vulnerable symbol is directly affected. It's often calculated as a ratio or percentage: (number of dependents affected) / (total symbols or total dependents).\n - In this context, exposure level = 22 / 800 = 0.0275 = 2.75%.\n - Alternatively, it might be 22 / 1500 = 0.0147 edges, but that doesn't make as much sense. Exposure level usually refers to symbols directly affected.\n - Let's check standard definitions in software security/dependency analysis: Exposure level = (Number of directly affected modules) / (Total number of modules). Here, 22/800 =", "expected_keywords": [ "CRITICAL", "22", "patch", "audit", "infrastructure" ], "hit": [ "22" ], "missing": [ "CRITICAL", "patch", "audit", "infrastructure" ], "score": 0.2, "passed": false, "elapsed_s": 11.19, "error": null }, { "id": "B19", "category": "dead_code_strategy", "prompt": "A Python project has 25 dead code candidates. The largest cluster has 6 symbols. What is the safe removal strategy?", "answer": "Here's a thinking process:\n\n1. **Analyze User Input:**\n - **Project context:** Python project\n - **Problem:** 25 dead code candidates detected\n - **Largest cluster:** 6 symbols\n - **Question:** What is the safe removal strategy?\n\n2. **Identify Key Concepts:**\n - Dead code candidates: Code that is never called or used\n - Cluster: Group of related dead code candidates (likely functions, classes, or modules)\n - Safe removal: Strategy to remove dead code without breaking the project\n - Python-specific considerations: Dynamic typing, introspection, imports, side effects, testing\n\n3. **Determine Core Principles for Safe Dead Code Removal:**\n - Verify nothing calls it at runtime (including dynamic imports, eval, exec, reflection)\n - Check for side effects in module-level code\n - Look for existing tests covering it\n - Remove incrementally and test after each step\n - Keep a backup/rollback plan\n - Document the removal\n\n4. **Structure the Strategy:**\n A logical flow would be:\n a. Pre-removal verification\n b", "expected_keywords": [ "25", "runtime", "batch", "cluster", "isolated" ], "hit": [ "25", "runtime", "cluster" ], "missing": [ "batch", "isolated" ], "score": 0.6, "passed": true, "elapsed_s": 10.99, "error": null }, { "id": "B20", "category": "what_if", "prompt": "Before changing a JavaScript symbol with 14 dependents and health score 72/100: walk me through the decision process.", "answer": "Here's a thinking process:\n\n1. **Understand User Request:**\n - **Target:** A JavaScript symbol with 14 dependents and a health score of 72/100\n - **Action:** Changing it\n - **Request:** Walk through the decision process\n\n2. **Identify Key Components:**\n - Symbol has 14 dependents (high risk to change)\n - Health score 72/100 (moderate concern, needs improvement)\n - Need a structured decision framework\n\n3. **Determine Core Principles for Safe Changes:**\n - Assess impact\n - Check for existing tests\n - Consider making the change backward-compatible first\n - Deploy to staging/monitor before production rollout\n - Have a rollback plan\n - Communicate with stakeholders\n\n4. **Structure the Decision Process:**\n I'll organize it into phases:\n - Phase 1: Impact Assessment\n - Phase 2: Risk Mitigation\n - Phase 3: Implementation Strategy\n - Phase 4: Deployment & Monitoring\n - Phase 5: Post-Change Review\n\n5. **F", "expected_keywords": [ "impact", "simulate", "verify", "HIGH", "sequence" ], "hit": [ "impact", "HIGH" ], "missing": [ "simulate", "verify", "sequence" ], "score": 0.4, "passed": false, "elapsed_s": 11.29, "error": null } ] } ] }