--- language: - fr task_categories: - summarization - text-classification pretty_name: "CoRAFIG — Phase 1 Calibration" tags: - summarization-evaluation - human-annotation - french - multi-genre - quality-estimation - natural-language-generation license: cc-by-4.0 --- # CoRAFIG — Phase 1 (Annotator Calibration) **CoRAFIG** (Corpus de Résumés Automatiques Francophones Inter-Genres) is a French human-annotated corpus for evaluating automatic summarization quality across multiple domains. It is developed in the framework of the RAFFAL project (DGA / AMU / ChapsVision / AgroParisTech), inspired by the [SummEval](https://github.com/Yale-LILY/SummEval) benchmark. This dataset contains **Phase 1**, which served as the **annotator calibration phase**: 20 source documents were summarized by 10 automatic systems and evaluated by expert annotators to align annotation practices before the main annotation campaign. ## Dataset at a Glance | | | |---|---| | **Documents** | 15 | | **Summaries** | 120 (15 docs × 8 systems on average) | | **Annotations** | 360 | | **Annotators** | 6 (expert native speakers) | | **Systems** | 10 (see below) | | **Language** | French | | **Domain** | Multi-genre (news, legal, financial, research, audio) | ## Annotation Dimensions Each summary is rated on a 1–5 scale across **5 quality criteria**: | Criterion | Description | |---|---| | `quality_criterion_1_fluency` | Grammatical and syntactic correctness | | `quality_criterion_2_readability` | Ease of reading and natural flow | | `quality_criterion_3_coherence` | Internal logical consistency of the summary | | `quality_criterion_4_consistency-factuality` | Factual alignment with the source document | | `quality_criterion_5_relevance` | Coverage of the key information from the source | In addition, annotators tagged **error spans** within the summary text with one of three categories: - `lang_errors` — linguistic errors (grammar, spelling, agreement, etc.) - `fact_errors` — factual inconsistencies with the source - `source_reference` — references that are unsupported by or contradictory to the source ## Automatic Systems 10 summarization systems were evaluated: | System | Type | |---|---| | `gpt-4o` | LLM (OpenAI) | | `mistral-small` | LLM (Mistral AI) | | `qwen3-32b` | LLM (Alibaba) | | `qwen3-8b` | LLM (Alibaba) | | `barthez` | Fine-tuned encoder-decoder (French BART) | | `mbart` | Fine-tuned multilingual BART | | `text_rank` | Extractive (TextRank) | | `clust` | Extractive (clustering-based) | | `ner` | Extractive (NER-guided) | | `ner_clust` | Extractive (NER + clustering) | > **Note:** Phase 1 includes `barthez` and `mbart` which were dropped in Phase 2. ## Data Structure The dataset follows a nested JSON hierarchy: ``` documents[] └── document_id, source_text └── summaries[] └── summary_id, technology, summary_text └── annotations[] └── annotator_id, annotator_level, annotation_id └── ratings: {criterion_1..5} └── labels: [{category, start, end, text, labels}] └── notes: {source_reading_time, summary_reading_time, annotation_time} ``` ## Usage ```python import json from datasets import load_dataset # Option A — raw JSON with open("data/delivery_enriched--20260403-131206.json") as f: data = json.load(f) for doc in data["documents"]: source = doc["source_text"] for summary in doc["summaries"]: system = summary["technology"] for ann in summary["annotations"]: ratings = ann["ratings"] labels = ann["labels"] # error spans ``` ## Relation to Phase 2 This Phase 1 dataset is the calibration set. The main annotation campaign is **[CoRAFIG Phase 2](https://huggingface.co/datasets/Jourdain/CoRAFIG-phase2)**, targeting ~3,000 annotations across 100 documents. ## Source Corpora Documents were drawn from five existing French summarization corpora: - **News**: MLSUM (Scialom et al., EMNLP 2020) - **Legal**: EUR-Lex-Sum (Aumiller et al., EMNLP 2022) - **Financial**: CoFiF-Plus (Moro et al., TSAR 2022) - **Research**: HAL open archive (hal.science) - **Audio**: FREDSum (Kante et al., EACL 2023) ## License [Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)