Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -29,3 +29,162 @@ configs:
|
|
| 29 |
- split: test
|
| 30 |
path: data/test-*
|
| 31 |
---
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 29 |
- split: test
|
| 30 |
path: data/test-*
|
| 31 |
---
|
| 32 |
+
|
| 33 |
+
# RePOPE (HuggingFace Version)
|
| 34 |
+
|
| 35 |
+
This dataset is a **Hugging Face formatted version of the RePOPE benchmark**, uploaded to make it easier to use in evaluation pipelines and multimodal research.
|
| 36 |
+
|
| 37 |
+
RePOPE is a **corrected relabeling of the POPE benchmark**, which is commonly used to evaluate **object hallucination in Vision-Language Models (VLMs)**. The dataset fixes annotation errors in the original POPE benchmark and removes ambiguous examples.
|
| 38 |
+
|
| 39 |
+
Original paper:
|
| 40 |
+
**RePOPE: Impact of Annotation Errors on the POPE Benchmark**
|
| 41 |
+
Yannic Neuhaus, Matthias Hein (2025)
|
| 42 |
+
|
| 43 |
+
---
|
| 44 |
+
|
| 45 |
+
# Dataset Overview
|
| 46 |
+
|
| 47 |
+
RePOPE evaluates whether a model **incorrectly claims that an object exists in an image**.
|
| 48 |
+
|
| 49 |
+
Example question format:
|
| 50 |
+
|
| 51 |
+
```
|
| 52 |
+
Question: Is there a car in the image?
|
| 53 |
+
Answer: Yes / No
|
| 54 |
+
```
|
| 55 |
+
|
| 56 |
+
The model must answer correctly based on the image.
|
| 57 |
+
|
| 58 |
+
Incorrect answers may indicate **object hallucination**, where the model claims objects exist that are not present.
|
| 59 |
+
|
| 60 |
+
---
|
| 61 |
+
|
| 62 |
+
# Dataset Statistics
|
| 63 |
+
|
| 64 |
+
* Total examples: **8185**
|
| 65 |
+
🔄 Changed 494 answers.
|
| 66 |
+
❌ Removed 815 ambigious questions in POPE.
|
| 67 |
+
* Image source: **COCO 2014 validation set**
|
| 68 |
+
* Categories:
|
| 69 |
+
|
| 70 |
+
* **random**
|
| 71 |
+
* **popular**
|
| 72 |
+
* **adversarial**
|
| 73 |
+
|
| 74 |
+
These splits follow the structure of the original **POPE benchmark**.
|
| 75 |
+
|
| 76 |
+
---
|
| 77 |
+
|
| 78 |
+
# Dataset Features
|
| 79 |
+
|
| 80 |
+
| Feature | Type | Description |
|
| 81 |
+
| ----------------- | ------ | --------------------------------------------------- |
|
| 82 |
+
| `id` | string | Unique identifier for the sample |
|
| 83 |
+
| `question_id` | string | Identifier linking to the question instance |
|
| 84 |
+
| `question` | string | yes/no question about objects in the image |
|
| 85 |
+
| `answer` | string | Correct label after RePOPE relabeling |
|
| 86 |
+
| `pope_old_answer` | string | Original answer from the POPE benchmark |
|
| 87 |
+
| `image_source` | string | COCO image identifier |
|
| 88 |
+
| `image` | image | The corresponding COCO image |
|
| 89 |
+
| `category` | string | Split category (`random`, `popular`, `adversarial`) |
|
| 90 |
+
|
| 91 |
+
---
|
| 92 |
+
|
| 93 |
+
# Example
|
| 94 |
+
|
| 95 |
+
```python
|
| 96 |
+
from datasets import load_dataset
|
| 97 |
+
|
| 98 |
+
dataset = load_dataset("SushantGautam/RePOPE")
|
| 99 |
+
|
| 100 |
+
print(dataset["test"][0])
|
| 101 |
+
```
|
| 102 |
+
|
| 103 |
+
Example output:
|
| 104 |
+
|
| 105 |
+
```
|
| 106 |
+
{
|
| 107 |
+
'id': '...',
|
| 108 |
+
'question_id': '...',
|
| 109 |
+
'question': 'Is there a car in the image?',
|
| 110 |
+
'answer': 'no',
|
| 111 |
+
'pope_old_answer': 'yes',
|
| 112 |
+
'image_source': 'COCO_val2014_000000310196',
|
| 113 |
+
'category': 'adversarial',
|
| 114 |
+
'image': <PIL.Image>
|
| 115 |
+
}
|
| 116 |
+
```
|
| 117 |
+
|
| 118 |
+
---
|
| 119 |
+
|
| 120 |
+
# Why RePOPE?
|
| 121 |
+
|
| 122 |
+
The original POPE dataset contains **annotation errors and ambiguous samples**.
|
| 123 |
+
These issues can significantly impact evaluation metrics such as **F1 score**.
|
| 124 |
+
|
| 125 |
+
Key findings from the RePOPE paper:
|
| 126 |
+
|
| 127 |
+
* Incorrect **"yes" labels**: **9.3%**
|
| 128 |
+
* Incorrect **"no" labels**: **1.7%**
|
| 129 |
+
|
| 130 |
+
This imbalance can distort hallucination evaluation results.
|
| 131 |
+
|
| 132 |
+
RePOPE fixes these issues by:
|
| 133 |
+
|
| 134 |
+
* correcting incorrect labels
|
| 135 |
+
* removing ambiguous samples
|
| 136 |
+
* preserving compatibility with POPE evaluation pipelines
|
| 137 |
+
|
| 138 |
+
---
|
| 139 |
+
|
| 140 |
+
# Intended Use
|
| 141 |
+
|
| 142 |
+
This dataset is intended for:
|
| 143 |
+
|
| 144 |
+
* Evaluating **vision-language models**
|
| 145 |
+
* Studying **object hallucination**
|
| 146 |
+
* Benchmarking multimodal systems
|
| 147 |
+
* Comparing hallucination mitigation techniques
|
| 148 |
+
|
| 149 |
+
Example models evaluated with POPE/RePOPE:
|
| 150 |
+
|
| 151 |
+
* LLaVA
|
| 152 |
+
* Qwen-VL
|
| 153 |
+
* BLIP
|
| 154 |
+
* GPT-4V
|
| 155 |
+
|
| 156 |
+
---
|
| 157 |
+
|
| 158 |
+
# Dataset Source
|
| 159 |
+
|
| 160 |
+
Original annotations from the official RePOPE repository:
|
| 161 |
+
|
| 162 |
+
[https://github.com/YanNeu/RePOPE](https://github.com/YanNeu/RePOPE)
|
| 163 |
+
|
| 164 |
+
Images come from:
|
| 165 |
+
|
| 166 |
+
**MS COCO 2014 validation set**
|
| 167 |
+
|
| 168 |
+
---
|
| 169 |
+
|
| 170 |
+
# Citation
|
| 171 |
+
|
| 172 |
+
If you use this dataset, please cite the original paper:
|
| 173 |
+
|
| 174 |
+
```
|
| 175 |
+
@article{neuhaus2025repope,
|
| 176 |
+
title={RePOPE: Impact of Annotation Errors on the POPE Benchmark},
|
| 177 |
+
author={Neuhaus, Yannic and Hein, Matthias},
|
| 178 |
+
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.15707},
|
| 179 |
+
year={2025}
|
| 180 |
+
}
|
| 181 |
+
```
|
| 182 |
+
|
| 183 |
+
---
|
| 184 |
+
|
| 185 |
+
# Acknowledgements
|
| 186 |
+
|
| 187 |
+
Thanks to the authors of:
|
| 188 |
+
|
| 189 |
+
* **POPE** – Evaluating object hallucination in large vision-language models
|
| 190 |
+
* **RePOPE** – Correcting annotation errors in the POPE benchmark
|