Daciberg Lima

Gonc ¸alves

John Guaschi
email: john.guaschi@unicaen.fr

Fixed points of n-valued maps on surfaces and the Wecken property -a configuration space approach

Keywords: MSC 2010 55M20, 54C60, 20F36, 57M10, 55R80 multivalued maps, fixed points, Wecken property, Nielsen numbers, braids, configuration space

In this paper, we explore the fixed point theory of n-valued maps using configuration spaces and braid groups, focussing on two fundamental problems, the Wecken property, and the computation of the Nielsen number. We show that the projective plane (resp. the 2-sphere S 2 ) has the Wecken property for n-valued maps for all n ∈ N (resp. all n ≥ 3). In the case n = 2 and S 2 , we prove a partial result about the Wecken property. We then describe the Nielsen number of a non-split n-valued map φ : X ⊸ X of an orientable, compact manifold without boundary in terms of the Nielsen coincidence numbers of a certain finite covering q : X -→ X with a subset of the coordinate maps of a lift of the n-valued split map φ • q : X ⊸ X.

Introduction

Multifunctions and their fixed point theory have been widely studied, see the books [START_REF] Berge | Topological Spaces[END_REF][START_REF] Górniewicz | Topological fixed point theory of multivalued mappings[END_REF] for example, where fairly general classes of multifunctions and spaces are considered. In all of what follows, X and Y will be topological spaces. Let φ : X ⊸ Y be an nvalued function i.e. a function that to each x ∈ X associates an unordered subset φ(x) of Y of cardinality n. Recall that such an n-valued function φ is continuous if for all x ∈ X, φ(x) is closed, and for any open set V in Y , the sets {x ∈ X | φ(x) ⊂ V } and 1 {x ∈ X | φ(x) ∩ V = ∅} are open in X. We will refer to a continuous n-valued function as an n-valued map. The class of n-valued maps is of particular interest, and more information about their fixed point theory on finite complexes may be found in [START_REF] Better | Equivariant Nielsen fixed point theory for n-valued maps[END_REF][START_REF] Better | A Wecken theorem for n-valued maps[END_REF][START_REF] Brown | Fixed points of n-valued maps of the circle[END_REF][START_REF] Brown | The Lefschetz number of an n-valued multimap[END_REF][START_REF] Brown | Nielsen numbers of n-valued fibre maps[END_REF][START_REF] Brown | Construction of multiply fixed n-valued maps[END_REF][START_REF] Brown R F | Nielsen coincidence, fixed point and root theories of n-valued maps[END_REF][START_REF] Brown R F | Coincidences of projections and linear n-valued maps of tori[END_REF][START_REF] Schirmer | Fix-finite approximations of n-valued multifunctions[END_REF][START_REF] Schirmer | An index and a Nielsen number for n-valued multifunctions[END_REF][START_REF] Schirmer | A minimum theorem for n-valued multifunctions[END_REF]. A homotopy between two n-valued maps φ 1 , φ 2 : X ⊸ Y is an n-valued map H : X × I ⊸ Y such that φ 1 = H(•, 0) and φ 2 = H(•, 1). Following [START_REF] Schirmer | Fix-finite approximations of n-valued multifunctions[END_REF], an n-valued function φ : X ⊸ Y is said to be a split n-valued map if there exist single-valued maps f 1 , f 2 , . . . , f n : X -→ Y such that φ(x) = {f 1 (x), . . . , f n (x)} for all x ∈ X. This being the case, we shall write φ = {f 1 , . . . , f n }. Let Spl(X, Y, n) denote the set of split n-valued maps between X and Y . A priori, φ : X ⊸ Y is just an n-valued function, but if it is split then it is continuous by [START_REF] Gonçalves | Fixed points of multimaps, the fixed point property and the case of surfaces -a braid approach[END_REF]Proposition 42], which justifies the use of the word 'map' in the definition. Partly for this reason, split n-valued maps play an important rôle in the theory. If φ : X ⊸ X is an n-valued map from X to itself, we say that x ∈ X is a fixed point of φ if x ∈ φ(x), and we denote the set of fixed points of φ by Fix(φ).

In [START_REF] Schirmer | An index and a Nielsen number for n-valued multifunctions[END_REF]Section 5], Schirmer defined the notion of Nielsen number of n-valued maps of finite complexes. Her definition is similar to that for single-valued maps, although it is a little more elaborate. As for the case of single-valued maps, for appropriate spaces, the Nielsen number N(φ) of an n-valued map φ : X ⊸ X provides a lower bound for the number of fixed points among all n-valued maps homotopic to φ. The computation of the Nielsen number of a self-or n-valued map is an important problem in fixed point theory, and is not easy in general. In the split case, we have the following formula for the Nielsen number of n-valued maps of polyhedra in terms of the constituent single-valued maps.

Theorem 1. [START_REF] Schirmer | An index and a Nielsen number for n-valued multifunctions[END_REF]Corollary 7.2] Let φ = {f 1 , f 2 , . . . , f n } : X ⊸ X be a split n-valued map, where X is a compact polyhedron. Then N(φ) = N(f 1 ) +

• • • + N(f n ).
A second fundamental problem in fixed point theory is to decide whether a space X has the Wecken property. Recall that the homotopy class of an n-valued map φ : X ⊸ X is said to have the Wecken property if there exists an n-valued map ψ : X ⊸ X homotopic to φ that has exactly N(φ) fixed points, and that a space X has the Wecken property for n-valued maps if every homotopy class of n-valued maps of X has the Wecken property. For single-valued maps, many complexes of dimension at least three have the Wecken property [START_REF] Kelly | Minimizing the number of fixed points for self-maps of compact surfaces[END_REF][START_REF] Wecken | Fixpunktklassen I[END_REF][START_REF] Wecken | Fixpunktklassen II, Homotopieinvarianten der Fixpunkttheorie[END_REF][START_REF] Wecken | Fixpunktklassen III, Mindestzahlen von Fixpunkten[END_REF]. In the case of surfaces, the 2-sphere S 2 , the real projective plane RP 2 have the Wecken property [START_REF] Bogatyi | The minimal number of roots of surface mappings and quadratic equations in free groups[END_REF][START_REF] Jiang | The Wecken property of the projective plane[END_REF], as do the 2-torus T 2 and the Klein bottle (see [START_REF] Gonçalves | Teoria do índice, 14o Colóquio Brasileiro de Matemática[END_REF] for example). However, Jiang showed that no other compact surface without boundary has the Wecken property [START_REF] Jiang | Fixed points and braids[END_REF][START_REF] Jiang | Fixed points and braids II[END_REF]. For n-valued maps, substantial progress has been made in the study of the Wecken property. The following result mirrors that for single-valued maps.

Theorem 2. [START_REF] Schirmer | A minimum theorem for n-valued multifunctions[END_REF]Theorem 5.2] Let M be a compact triangulable manifold (with or without boundary) of dimension greater than or equal to 3, and let n ∈ N. Then every n-valued map φ : M ⊸ M is homotopic to an n-valued map that has N(φ) fixed points. In particular, M has the Wecken property for n-valued maps.

Theorem 2 has been extended to a larger class of spaces, including some 2-dimensional complexes, as follows.

Theorem 3. [3, Theorem 1] Let X be a compact polyhedron without local cut points and such that no connected component of X is a surface. Then X has the Wecken property for n-valued maps.

In a recent paper [START_REF] Gonçalves | Fixed points of multimaps, the fixed point property and the case of surfaces -a braid approach[END_REF], we studied some aspects of fixed point theory of n-valued maps from X to Y by introducing an equivalent and natural formulation in terms of singlevalued maps from X to the n th unordered configuration space D n (Y ) of X, where D n (Y ) is the quotient of the n th (ordered) configuration space F n (X) of X, defined by: F n (Y ) = {(y 1 , . . . , y n ) | y i ∈ Y , and y i = y j if i = j } , by the free action of the symmetric group S n given by permuting coordinates. It is well known that π 1 (D n (Y )) (resp. π 1 (F n (Y ))) is the braid group B n (Y ) (resp. pure braid group P n (Y )) of Y on n strings, that the quotient map π : F n (Y ) -→ D n (Y ) is a regular n!-fold covering, and that P n (Y ) is the kernel of the surjective homomorphism τ : B n (Y ) -→ S n that to a braid associates its induced permutation. Configuration spaces play an important rôle in several branches of mathematics and have been extensively studied, see [START_REF] Cohen F R | On loop spaces of configuration spaces[END_REF][START_REF] Fadell | The Nielsen number on surfaces. Topological methods in nonlinear functional analysis[END_REF] for example. As in [START_REF] Gonçalves | Fixed points of multimaps, the fixed point property and the case of surfaces -a braid approach[END_REF], a map Φ : X -→ D n (Y ) will be called an n-unordered map, and a map Ψ : X -→ F n (Y ) will be called an n-ordered map. For such an n-ordered map, for i = 1, . . . , n, there exist maps f i : X -→ Y such that Ψ(x) = (f 1 (x), . . . , f n (x)) for all x ∈ X, and for which f i (x) = f j (x) for all 1 ≤ i, j ≤ n, i = j, and all x ∈ X. In this case, we will often write Ψ = (f 1 , . . . , f n ). There is an obvious bijection between the set of npoint subsets of Y and D n (Y ) that induces a bijection between the set of n-valued functions from X to Y and the set of functions from X to D n (Y ). If we suppose in addition that X and Y are metric spaces, then D n (Y ) may be equipped with a certain Hausdorff metric [START_REF] Gonçalves | Fixed points of multimaps, the fixed point property and the case of surfaces -a braid approach[END_REF]Appendix], in which case this bijection restricts to a bijection between the set of n-valued maps from X to Y and the set of (continuous) maps from X to D n (Y ) [START_REF] Gonçalves | Fixed points of multimaps, the fixed point property and the case of surfaces -a braid approach[END_REF]Theorem 8]. If φ : X ⊸ Y is an n-valued map then we shall say that the map Φ : X -→ D n (Y ) obtained by this bijection as the map associated to φ. If a map Φ : X -→ D n (Y ) admits a lift Φ : X -→ F n (Y ) via the covering map π then we say that Φ is a lift of φ. By [22, Section 2.1], φ is split if and only if it admits a lift.

In [START_REF] Gonçalves | Fixed points of multimaps, the fixed point property and the case of surfaces -a braid approach[END_REF], we showed that spheres and real and complex projective spaces of even dimension have the fixed point property for n-valued maps, and we expressed the problem of deforming an n-valued map to a fixed point free n-valued map in terms of an algebraic criterion involving the braid groups of X, which we then used to determine an infinite number of homotopy classes of split 2-valued maps of T 2 that contain a fixed point free representative. In this paper, we explore some other aspects of fixed point theory of nvalued maps using the above formulation in terms of configuration spaces. We establish an equality for the Nielsen number in the non-split case, and we study the Wecken property for some surfaces. We now describe the contents of this paper in more detail.

In Section 2, we recall some fundamental results from [START_REF] Gonçalves | Fixed points of multimaps, the fixed point property and the case of surfaces -a braid approach[END_REF], and in Section 2.1, we show that the 2-disc has the Wecken property for n-valued maps for all n ∈ N. In Sections 2.2 and 3, we analyse the Wecken problem for n-valued maps of S 2 and RP 2 respectively. In the first case, one important step is to determine the number of homotopy classes of nvalued maps of S 2 . In Lemma 10, we show that there is just one such class if n ≥ 3, while if n = 2, we show that the set of such homotopy classes is in bijection with N. If φ : S 2 ⊸ S 2 is a 2-valued map then we refer to the non-negative integer given by this correspondence as the degree of φ (or its homotopy class). Let A : S 2 -→ S 2 denote the antipodal map. In the case of RP 2 , in Proposition 13, we show that there are precisely two homotopy classes of n-valued maps of RP 2 for all n ≥ 2, and we give explicit representatives of these homotopy classes. To prove the Wecken property for n-valued maps of RP 2 , it then suffices to check that each of these homotopy classes has the Wecken property. We summarise the main results of Sections 2 and 3 as follows.

Proposition 4. (a) Let f 0 : S 2 -→ S 2 be the constant map at a point x 0 ∈ S 2 . Then f 0 has degree 0, and f 0 and A • f 0 each have precisely one fixed point. (b) There exists a map f 1 : S 2 -→ S 2 of degree 1 that has a single fixed point and such that the map A • f 1 is fixed point free. (c) There exists a map f 2 : S 2 -→ S 2 of degree 2 such that f 2 and the map A • f 2 each possess a single fixed point. (d) The Wecken property holds for: (i) n-valued maps of S 2 for all n ≥ 3.

(ii) the homotopy classes of 2-valued maps of degree 0, 1 or 2.

Proposition 4(d)(ii) has been obtained independently in [START_REF] Brown R F, Ericksen | The Wecken property of n-valued multimaps of the 2-sphere[END_REF]. Our proof is different from that given in [START_REF] Brown R F, Ericksen | The Wecken property of n-valued multimaps of the 2-sphere[END_REF], and is perhaps more direct. The paper [START_REF] Brown R F, Ericksen | The Wecken property of n-valued multimaps of the 2-sphere[END_REF] contains other results about n-valued maps of S 2 , concerning for example the minimal number of fixed points in a given homotopy class of a 2-valued map (see [START_REF] Brown R F, Ericksen | The Wecken property of n-valued multimaps of the 2-sphere[END_REF]Theorem 4.1]). Apart from the three cases given in Proposition 4(d)(ii), we believe that this minimal number is not known. We do not know either whether the Wecken property holds for 2-valued maps of S 2 of degree greater than or equal to 3.

Theorem 5. The projective plane RP 2 has the Wecken property for n-valued maps for all n ∈ N.

In Section 4, we consider the problem of the computation of the Nielsen number of n-valued maps of a compact, orientable manifold X without boundary. To do this, we shall use [START_REF] Gonçalves | Fixed points of multimaps, the fixed point property and the case of surfaces -a braid approach[END_REF]Proposition 16], which given an n-valued map φ : X ⊸ X, states that there exists a finite covering q : X -→ X such that the composition φ • q : X ⊸ X is split, and [22, Proposition 17], which describes the fixed points of φ in terms of the coincidences of q with the coordinate maps of a lift of the split n-valued map φ • q. We analyse the behaviour of this description with respect to the essential Nielsen classes (i.e. the Nielsen classes of non-zero index). This yields a partial analogue of Theorem 1 in the non-split case as follows.

Theorem 6. Let X be an orientable, compact manifold without boundary, and let φ : X ⊸ X be a non-split n-valued map. Let Φ : X -→ D n (X) be the map associated to φ, let H be the kernel of the composition τ

• Φ # : π 1 (X) -→ S n , let L ′ = Im (τ • Φ # ), and for i = 1, . . . , n, let L ′ i,i = {α ∈ L ′ | α(i) = i}.
Let q : X -→ X be the finite regular covering of X that corresponds to H. Let Φ 1 = (f 1 , . . . , f n ) : X -→ F n (X) be a lift of the split n-valued map φ • q : X ⊸ X, and suppose that the action of L ′ i,i on {1, . . . , n} is free for all i ∈ {1, . . . , n}. Then the Nielsen number N(φ) of φ is equal to j∈I 0 N(q, f i j ), where i j runs over a set I 0 of representatives of the orbits of this action.

If n = 2, the condition that the action be free is necessarily satisfied, and in this case, we shall prove in Corollary 23 that N(φ) = N(q, f 1 ) = N(q, f 2 ). The study of the Wecken property for multivalued maps of the torus constitutes work in progress by the authors, and some preliminary results that are closely related to this problem may be found in [START_REF] Gonçalves | Fixed points of multimaps, the fixed point property and the case of surfaces -a braid approach[END_REF].

Let n ∈ N. Given a topological space X, we are interested in understanding the fixed point theory of its n-valued maps. In this section, we will show that if n ∈ N (resp. n ≥ 3), the 2-disc D2 and the (resp. the 2-sphere S 2 ) has the Wecken property for n-valued maps. We first recall some definitions and results from [START_REF] Gonçalves | Fixed points of multimaps, the fixed point property and the case of surfaces -a braid approach[END_REF]. Given an n-valued map φ : X ⊸ X as defined in Section 1, let Φ : X -→ D n (X) denote the associated n-unordered map, and if φ is split, let Φ : X -→ F n (X) be an n-ordered map that is a lift of φ. By a single-valued map (or simply a map) f : X -→ Y between two topological spaces, we shall always mean a continuous function from X to Y , and [X, Y ] will denote the set of unbased homotopy classes of maps between X and Y . We recall the following result, which shows that for a large class of spaces, (homotopy classes of) n-valued maps may be identified with (homotopy classes of) maps whose target is an unordered configuration space. Let I denote the unit interval [0, 1]. Proof. Part (a) is a direct consequence of [START_REF] Gonçalves | Fixed points of multimaps, the fixed point property and the case of surfaces -a braid approach[END_REF]Theorem 8]. For part (b), since X × I is also a metric space, we may apply [START_REF] Gonçalves | Fixed points of multimaps, the fixed point property and the case of surfaces -a braid approach[END_REF]Theorem 8] to n-valued maps between X × I and Y . So it follows that two n-valued maps φ 1 , φ 2 : X ⊸ Y are homotopic if and only if the corresponding maps Φ 1 , Φ 2 : X -→ D n (Y ) are homotopic, and the result follows. From now on, we will assume that our spaces are metric spaces, so that we may interpret an n-valued map from X to Y as a map from X to D n (Y ) using Theorem 7(a). Proof. Let n ∈ N, and let (x 1 , . . . , x n ) ∈ F n (D 2 ). By Theorem 7(b), the set of homotopy classes of n-valued maps of the 2-disc D 2 may be identified with the set [D 2 , D n (D 2 )] of homotopy classes of maps between D 2 and D n (D 2 ). Since the domain D 2 is contractible, this set has only one element, which is the class of the constant map c = {c 1 , . . . , c n } :

D 2 -→ D n (D 2 )
, where for all i = 1, . . . , n, the map c i : D 2 -→ D 2 is the constant map at x i . Then the map c has exactly n fixed points, and N(c) = n by Theorem 1, which proves the proposition.

The case of n-valued maps of the 2-sphere

We now show that the Wecken property holds for n-valued maps of S 2 for all n = 2. The case n = 2 remains open, although we are able to provide some partial results (see also [START_REF] Brown R F, Ericksen | The Wecken property of n-valued multimaps of the 2-sphere[END_REF]). Since the case n = 1 is well known, see for example [5, Proposition 2.2], we will assume that n ≥ 2.

Lemma 10. If n > 2 (resp. n = 2), the set of homotopy classes of n-valued maps of S 2 possesses exactly one element (resp. is in one-to-one correspondence with N).

Proof. Theorem 7(b) implies that it suffices to determine the set [S 2 , D n (S 2 )], which in turn is the orbit space of π 2 (D n (S 2 )) under the action of π 1 (D n (S 2 )). Now F n (S 2 ) is a regular n!-fold covering of D n (S 2
), and if n = 2 (resp. n ≥ 3), the universal covering of F n (S 2 ) has the homotopy type of S 2 (resp. of S 3 ) by [START_REF] Bödigheimer C F | Mapping class groups and function spaces[END_REF][START_REF] Feichtner | The integral cohomology algebras of ordered configuration spaces of spheres[END_REF] or [20, pp. 43-44]. Using standard results about homotopy groups and covering spaces, it follows that π 2 (D n (S 2 )) is isomorphic to Z (resp. is trivial) if n = 2 (resp. n > 2) (see also [START_REF] Fadell | The braid groups of D 2 and S 2[END_REF]Corollary,page 211] for the case n ≥ 3). This proves the result if n ≥ 3. If n = 2, observe that the map S 2 -→ F 2 (S 2 ) given by x -→ (x, -x) is a homotopy equivalence that is Z 2 -equivariant with respect to the action of the antipodal map on S 2 and the action on F 2 (S 2 ) given by s : F 2 (S 2 ) -→ F 2 (S 2 ) defined by s(x, y) = (y, x). This gives rise to a homotopy equivalence between the corresponding orbit spaces, namely RP 2 and D 2 (S 2 ). Since the action of π 1 (RP 2 ) ∼ = Z 2 on π 2 (RP 2 ) ∼ = Z is multiplication by -1, the same is true for the action of π 1 (D 2 (S 2 ) on π 2 (D 2 (S 2 )), and the orbits are the subsets of the form {m, -m}, where m ∈ Z. It follows that the set [S 2 , D 2 (S 2 )] is in bijection with N.

We now study the Wecken property for n-valued maps of S 2 . Recall that if φ : S 2 ⊸ S 2 is a 2-valued map, the integer given by the correspondence with N of Lemma 10 is the degree of φ (or of its homotopy class).

Proof of Proposition 4. (a)

Part (a) is clear since the constant map f 0 : S 2 -→ S 2 at a point x 0 ∈ S 2 has precisely one fixed point, namely x 0 , and -x 0 is the unique fixed point of A • f 0 . (b) Let f 1 be a self-map of the unit 2-sphere S 2 that is a small deformation of the identity, i.e. f 1 satisfies |x -f 1 (x)| < π/2 for all x ∈ S 2 , and that has exactly one fixed point x 0 . Such a map may be constructed using a vector field on S 2 that possesses just one singular point, and in this way, the degree of f 1 is equal to 1. Then f 1 (x) = -x for all x ∈ S 2 , and thus A • f 1 is fixed point free, which concludes the proof of part (b).

(c) Consider the self map ρ : S 1 -→ S 1 given by z -→ z 2 . This map has one fixed point, which is {1}, and the map A • ρ has a single fixed point, which is {-1}. Now consider the reduced suspension of S 1 , i.e.

(S 1 × [0, 1])/({1} × [0, 1] ∪ S 1 × {0, 1}) = S 2
, and let f 2 be the suspension of the map ρ. Then f 2 has only one fixed point which is the equivalence class of the point {1} × {0}, and the map A • f 2 has a single fixed point, which is the equivalence class of {-1} × {1/2}, so it has the desired property. (d) To prove part (i), by Lemma 10, there is only one homotopy class of n-valued maps of S 2 if n ≥ 3, which is that of the constant n-valued map. The result then follows from part (a). To prove part (ii), the case of the homotopy class of degree 0 follows as in part (i). Now let i ∈ {1, 2}. For the homotopy class of degree i, consider the split 2-valued map

φ i = {f i , A • f i } : S 2 ⊸ S 2 . Then L(f i ) = 1 + i, so N(f i ) = 0, and thus N(f i ) = 1 because S 2 is simply connected. Hence by Theorem 1, N(φ i ) = N(f i ) + N(A • f i ), and so N(φ 1 ) = 1 + 0 = 1 and N(φ 2 ) = 1 + 1 = 2. Since Fix(φ 1 ) = {x 0 }
, where x 0 is the fixed point of f 1 given in the proof of part (b), and Fix(φ 2 ) = {1, -1}, it follows that the map φ i has the Wecken property.

The case of n-valued maps of the projective plane

The aim of this section is to prove that the projective plane RP 2 has the Wecken property for n-valued maps for all n ∈ N. Jiang showed that RP 2 has the Wecken property for single-valued maps [START_REF] Jiang | The Wecken property of the projective plane[END_REF], so it will suffice to study the case n ≥ 2. We start by computing the Nielsen number of an n-valued map of RP 2 . Lemma 11. Let n ≥ 1, and let φ : RP 2 ⊸ RP 2 be an n-valued map. Then N(φ) = n.

Proof. From [22, Lemma 14], φ is split, so for i = 1, . . . , n, there exist self-maps f i : RP 2 -→ RP 2 such that φ = {f 1 , . . . , f n }. Applying Theorem 1, N(φ) = n since N(f i ) = 1 for all i = 1, . . . , n by [START_REF] Jiang | The Wecken property of the projective plane[END_REF].

We now classify the homotopy classes of n-valued maps of RP 2 . If n = 1, it is well known that the set [RP 2 , RP 2 ] of homotopy classes of self-maps of RP 2 that induce the trivial homomorphism on the level of fundamental groups has two elements, see [24, Proposition 2.1] for example. One of these two homotopy classes is that of the constant map. We will describe the second homotopy class in terms of a representative map W P : RP 2 -→ RP 2 that we shall now define, where P ∈ S 2 , and S 2 ⊂ R 3 is the unit sphere in R 3 , which we equip with spherical coordinates (θ, ϕ), where θ ∈ [0, 2π) and ϕ ∈ [-π/2, π/2], so that P = (θ, π/2). With respect to the Cartesian coordinate system for which P = (0, 0, 1) and the point (1, 0, 0) has spherical coordinates (0, 0), the point with spherical coordinates (θ, ϕ) has Cartesian coordinates (cos ϕ cos θ, cos ϕ sin θ, sin ϕ). From this, one may see that with respect to the spherical coordinate system, (θ, ϕ -π 2 ) may be identified with (θ + π, -ϕ -π 2 ). We regard RP 2 as the quotient of S 2 by the free action of the group generated by the antipodal map A. Let p : S 2 -→ RP 2 be the usual covering map, for all x ∈ S 2 , let x = p(x), and let H + P be the hemisphere of S 2 whose pole is P . Let U P : S 2 -→ S 2 be the map defined by U P (θ, ϕ) = (θ, 2ϕ -π 2 ). The restriction U P H + P : H + P -→ S 2 sends each semi-meridian lying in H + P that starts at P and ends at the equator linearly to the meridian of S 2 that starts at P , ends at -P and contains the original semi-meridian. Since U P sends the whole of the equator to the point -P , U P H + P induces a map W ′ P : RP 2 -→ S 2 defined by W ′ P (x) = U P (x) for all x ∈ H + P . Let W P : RP 2 -→ RP 2 be defined by W P = p • W ′ P . Now A(θ, ϕ) = (θ + π, -ϕ), and up to the above-mentioned identification within the spherical coordinate system, for all (θ, ϕ) ∈ S 2 , we have:

U P • A(θ, ϕ) = U P (θ + π, -ϕ) = (θ + π, -2ϕ -π 2 ) = (θ, 2ϕ -π 2 ) = U P (θ, ϕ),
and it follows that U P is a lift of W P . We thus have the following commutative diagram: Proof. (a) Let x ∈ RP 2 , where x = p(x) and we take x to belong to H + P . Thus -x ∈ H + -P , p(-x) = x, and so W ′ -P (x) = U -P (-x). With respect to the same spherical coordinate system that was used to define U P , one may see that U -P (θ, ϕ) = (θ, 2ϕ + π

H + P S 2 RP 2 S 2 RP
2 ) for all (θ, ϕ) ∈ S 2 . From the above definitions, if x = (θ, ϕ), we have:

W P (x) = p • W ′ P (x) = p • U P (x) = p(θ, 2ϕ -π 2 ),
from which it follows that:

W -P (x) = p • W ′ -P (x) = p • U -P (-x) = p • U -P (θ + π, -ϕ) = p(θ + π, -2ϕ + π 2 ) = p • A(θ, 2ϕ -π 2 ) = p(θ, 2ϕ -π 2 ) = W P (x),
hence W P = W -P as required.

(b) Since W P factors through S 2 , it induces the trivial homomorphism on the fundamental group of RP 2 . Further, the map W ′ P is a lift of W P , so is non null-homotopic (it represents the non-trivial element of [RP 2 , S 2 ]) because its absolute degree is congruent to 1 mod 2. (c) Let P 1 , P 2 ∈ S 2 be such that P 1 = ±P 2 , let C be the (unique) great circle that passes through P 1 and P 2 , and let x ∈ S 2 be such that x ∈ Coin(W P 1 , W P 2 ). Then either x ∈ Coin(U P 1 , U P 2 ) or x ∈ Coin(U P 1 , A • U P 2 ). Let i ∈ {1, 2}. Observe that any two great circles of S 2 either coincide, or intersect in exactly two (antipodal) points, and that U P i maps every great circle that passes through P i to itself. Suppose first that x / ∈ C, and let C i be the great circle that passes through P i and x. Then C 1 ∩ C 2 = {x, A(x)}. Since U P i (x) ∈ C i and x ∈ Coin(U P 1 , U P 2 )∪Coin(U P 1 , A•U P 2 ), it follows that U P 1 (x) ∈ {x, A(x)}, and so p • U P 1 (x) = W P 1 (x) = x ∈ C. By part (a), this implies that x = P 1 , which yields a contradiction since x / ∈ C. So assume that x ∈ C. We write the elements of C in exponential form, taking P 1 to be e iπ/2 . Let ρ be the oriented angle P 1 P 2 , and let x = e iϕ . Then U P 1 (x) = e (2ϕ-π 2 )i and U P 2 (x) = e (2(ϕ-ρ)-π 2 )i+ρi = U P 1 (x). e -ρi . Since x ∈ Coin(U P 1 , U P 2 ) ∪ Coin(U P 1 , A • U P 2 ), we see that ρ ∈ {0, π}, but this implies that P 1 ∈ {P 2 , -P 2 }, which yields a contradiction. We conclude that W P 1 and W P 2 are coincidence free. (d) Suppose on the contrary that the pair (W P , c 0 ) can be deformed to a pair of coincidencefree self-maps of RP 2 . By [START_REF] Brooks | On removing coincidences of two maps when only one, rather than both, of them may be deformed by a homotopy[END_REF], there exists a map h : RP 2 -→ RP 2 that is homotopic to W P such that the pair (h, c 0 ) is coincidence free, and hence h is non surjective. The maps h and c 0 lift to maps h, c 0 : RP 2 -→ S 2 , where c 0 is also a constant map, and the non surjectivity of h implies that of h. Thus h is null homotopic, but then so is h, which yields a contradiction because h is homotopic to W P , and W P is non-null homotopic by part (b).

In the following proposition, we describe the set [RP 2 , F n (RP 2 )] (resp. [RP 2 , D n (RP 2 )]) of homotopy classes of maps between RP 2 and F n (RP 2 ) (resp. D n (RP 2 )), and the set of homotopy classes of n-valued maps of RP 2 , from which we will see that they each contain two elements. Let N = (0, 0, 1) ∈ S 2 . As we mentioned in the proof of Lemma 11, any n-valued map φ : RP 2 ⊸ RP 2 is split, and so the set of homotopy classes of n-valued maps of RP 2 is equal to Spl(RP 2 , RP 2 , n)/ ∼, where ∼ denotes the homotopy equivalence relation in Spl(RP 2 , RP 2 , n). (i) the first homotopy class consists of those n-valued maps φ : RP 2 ⊸ RP 2 such that any lift Φ : RP 2 -→ F n (RP 2 ) of φ induces the trivial homomorphism on the level of fundamental groups, and is homotopic to the constant map between RP 2 and F n (RP 2 ). (ii) if φ n : RP 2 ⊸ RP 2 is an n-valued map of RP 2 that represents the second homotopy class, and Φ n : RP 2 -→ F n (RP 2 ) is a lift of φ n , then for all i = 1, . . . , n, the composition of Φ n with the projection p i : F n (RP 2 ) -→ RP 2 onto the i th coordinate is homotopic to the map W N : RP 2 -→ RP 2 . Moreover, for all i = 1, . . . , n + 1, the composition of Φ n+1 with the projection q i : F n+1 (RP 2 ) -→ F n (RP 2 ) given by forgetting the i th coordinate is homotopic to Φ n .

Proposition 13. Let n ≥ 2.
Proof. Let n ≥ 2. (a) We start by showing that the set of homotopy classes [RP 2 , F n (RP 2 )] of n-ordered maps of RP 2 has two elements. Consider the following Barratt-Puppe sequence:

. . . -→ [S 2 , F n (RP 2 )] -→ [RP 2 , F n (RP 2 )] -→ [S 1 , F n (RP 2 )] -→ [S 1 , F n (RP 2 )] (1)
associated with the cofibration sequence [START_REF] Fadell | The braid groups of D 2 and S 2[END_REF]Corollary,p. 244]. Therefore [START_REF] Berge | Topological Spaces[END_REF] implies that the set [RP 2 , F n (RP 2 )] is in one-to-one correspondence with the set of elements of π 1 (F n (RP 2 )) = P n (RP 2 ) of order less than or equal to 2, namely the trivial element and the full twist ∆ 2 n [19, Proposition 23]. Let α : RP 2 -→ F n (RP 2 ) be an n-ordered map of RP 2 whose homotopy class [α] corresponds to ∆ 2 n . By (1), the image of [α] in [S 1 , F n (RP 2 )] is non trivial, and so the induced homomorphism α # : π 1 (RP 2 ) -→ P n (RP 2 ) is non trivial (and injective). In particular, α is non-homotopic to the constant map c : RP 2 -→ F n (RP 2 ), from which we conclude that [RP 2 , F n (RP 2 )] = {[c], [α]} has two distinct elements.

S 1 2 -→ S 1 -→ RP 2 -→ S 2 -→ S 2 -→ . . . for the space F n (RP 2 ), where the map [S 1 , F n (RP 2 )] -→ [S 1 , F n (RP 2 )] sends [β] to [β 2 ] for all maps β : S 1 -→ F n (RP 2 ). Now [S 2 , F n (RP 2 )] consists of a single homotopy class because π 2 (F n (RP 2 )) = 0
We now prove that there are bijections between [RP 2 , F n (RP 2 )], [RP 2 , D n (RP 2 )] and Spl(RP 2 , RP 2 , n)/ ∼. As we pointed out in the proof of [22, Lemma 9(b)], the covering map π :

F n (RP 2 ) -→ D n (RP 2 ) induces a map π : [RP 2 , F n (RP 2 )] -→ [RP 2 , D n (RP 2 )] defined by π([Φ]) = [π • Φ] for all Φ ∈ F n (RP 2 ) RP 2 . If Ψ : RP 2 -→ D n (RP 2
) is a map and ψ : RP 2 ⊸ RP 2 is the associated n-valued map, then ψ is split by [START_REF] Gonçalves | Fixed points of multimaps, the fixed point property and the case of surfaces -a braid approach[END_REF]Lemma 14]. It follows that there exists a lift Ψ : RP 2 -→ F n (RP 2 ) of ψ, and this map satisfies π • Ψ = Ψ. In particular, π is surjective, and hence

[RP 2 , D n (RP 2 )] = {[π • c], [π • α]} has at most two elements. Since π # : P n (RP 2 ) -→ B n (RP 2 ) is inclusion, (π • α) # : π 1 (RP 2 ) -→ B n (RP 2 ) is injective, and thus [π • c] = [π • α]. Therefore π is a bijection.
Finally, by [22, Lemma 9(b)], the set Spl(RP 2 , RP 2 , n)/ ∼ is in one-to-one correspondence with the orbits of the set [RP 2 , F n (RP 2 )] under the action of S n induced by that of

S n on F n (RP 2 ) RP 2 . But [RP 2 , F n (RP 2 )] = {[c], [α]},
) (i) If φ : RP 2 ⊸ RP 2 is an n-valued map of RP 2 such that the associated map Φ : RP 2 -→ D n (RP 2 ) belongs to the homotopy class [π • c] in [RP 2 , D n (RP 2 )] of the constant map c : RP 2 -→ F n (RP 2
), then it follows from the proof of part (a) that any lift Φ : RP 2 -→ F n (RP 2 ) of φ is homotopic to the constant map, and induces the trivial homomorphism on the level of fundamental groups. (ii) Let φ n : RP 2 ⊸ RP 2 be an n-valued map of RP 2 that represents the second (nontrivial) homotopy class, and let Φ n : RP 2 -→ F n (RP 2 ) be a lift of φ n , so that Φ n is homotopic to the map α given in the proof of part (a). For all 1 ≤ i ≤ n, the image of ∆ 2 n under the homomorphism induced by the projection p i : F n (RP 2 ) -→ RP 2 is trivial (this follows from the proof of [21, Proposition 8] using the fact that ∆ 2 n may be written as a product of the generators (A i,j ) 1≤i,j≤n given in that paper). Since the image of the induced homomorphism α # : π 1 (RP 2 ) -→ P n (RP 2 ) is equal to ∆ 2 n , the composition p i • Φ n : RP 2 -→ RP 2 induces the trivial homomorphism on the level of fundamental groups. Now let P 1 , . . . , P n be n distinct points of S 2 that lie on the geodesic arc between (1, 0, 0) and (0, 0, 1), and consider the map (W P 1 , . . . , W Pn ) : RP 2 -→ F n (RP 2 ). The fact that this map is well defined is a consequence of Lemma 12(c). Since p i •(W P 1 , . . . , W Pn ) = W P i for all i = 1, . . . , n, the map (W P 1 , . . . , W Pn ) is not homotopic to the constant map c, and so it is homotopic to α by the proof of part (a). In particular, Φ n is homotopic to (W P 1 , . . . , W Pn ), and the statements of part (b)(ii) then follow.

We are now able to prove the Wecken property for RP 2 .

Proof of Theorem 5. As we mentioned previously, RP 2 has the Wecken property for selfmaps. So suppose that n > 1. From Proposition 13, there are two homotopy classes of n-valued maps of RP 2 , and so by Lemma 11, it suffices to show that each of these classes admits a representative for which the number of fixed points is equal to n. Let P 1 , . . . , P n be as in the proof of Proposition 13(b)(ii), and let c P i : RP 2 -→ RP 2 be the constant map at P i . From Proposition 13, the two homotopy classes of n-valued maps of RP 2 contain an n-valued map φ : RP 2 ⊸ RP 2 that is split and admits a lift Φ = (φ 1 , . . . , φ n ) : RP 2 -→ F n (RP 2 ), where either φ i = c P i is the constant map at P i for all i = 1, . . . , n, or φ i = W P i for all i = 1, . . . , n. Using Lemma 12(a), Fix(φ i ) = P i for all i = 1, . . . , n, and hence φ has exactly n fixed points. Moreover, by Lemma 11 we have N(φ) = n. So each of the two homotopy classes of n-valued maps contains a representative φ for which N(φ) = n, and hence RP 2 has the Wecken property for n-valued maps.

Nielsen numbers of n-valued maps

The Nielsen number for n-valued maps of a compact polyhedron X was defined in [START_REF] Schirmer | An index and a Nielsen number for n-valued multifunctions[END_REF], and may be determined for split n-valued maps using Theorem 1. The aim of this section is to prove Theorem 6, where we give a formula for the Nielsen number of non-split nvalued maps of a space X that is in the same spirit as that of Theorem 1. For Theorem 6, we shall require X to be a compact, orientable manifold without boundary, in order to have the notions of index, Lefschetz and Nielsen numbers for coincidences of pairs of maps from finite coverings of X to X at our disposal. However, many of the results that lead to Theorem 6 are valid under weaker hypotheses on X, namely those of Proposition 14 below.

We start by recalling some notation and results from [22, Section 3.2] that will be used throughout the rest of the paper. Given an n-valued map φ : X ⊸ X of a topological space X that is locally path-connected and semi-locally simply connected, we consider the corresponding map Φ : X -→ D n (X), and the induced homomorphism Φ # : π 1 (X) -→ π 1 (D n (X)) on the level of fundamental groups, where π 1 (D n (X)) = B n (X). By the short exact sequence

1 -→ P n (X) -→ B n (X) τ -→ S n -→ 1, P n (X) is a normal subgroup of B n (X) of finite index n!, so the subgroup H = Φ -1 # (P n (X)
) is a normal subgroup of π 1 (X) of finite index. Let L be the finite quotient group π 1 (X)/H, and let q : X -→ X be the covering of X that corresponds to the subgroup H. Such a covering exists due to the hypotheses on X. As the following proposition shows, the fixed points of φ may be described in terms of the coincidences of q with the coordinate maps f 1 , . . . , f n : X -→ X of a lift of the n-valued map φ • q : X ⊸ X. Proposition 14. [START_REF] Gonçalves | Fixed points of multimaps, the fixed point property and the case of surfaces -a braid approach[END_REF]Propositions 16 and 17] Let n ∈ N, and suppose that X is a connected, locally arcwise-connected metric space. (a) With the above notation, the n-valued map φ 1 = φ • q : X ⊸ X admits exactly n! lifts, which are n-ordered maps from X to F n (X). If one such lift Φ 1 : X -→ F n (X) is given by Φ 1 = (f 1 , . . . , f n ), where for i = 1, . . . , n, f i is a map from X to X, then the other lifts are of the form (f ρ(1) , . . . , f ρ(n) ), where ρ ∈ S n . (b) if the lift Φ 1 = (f 1 , . . . , f n ) is as in part (a) then the restriction of q : X -→ X to n i=1 Coin(q, f i ) -→ Fix(φ) is surjective. Furthermore, the pre-image of a point x ∈ Fix(φ) by this map is precisely q -1 (x), namely the fibre over x ∈ X of the covering map q.

Although the lift Φ 1 is not unique, the set {f 1 , . . . , f n } is, and so the set n i=1 Coin(q, f i ) is independent of the choice of lift of φ. In what follows, we aim to describe the Nielsen classes of φ in terms of the Nielsen coincidence classes of the pairs (q, f i ), where i = 1, . . . , n, which will lead to a formula for N(φ) similar in spirit to that of Theorem 1. Observe that the composition π 1 (X)

Φ # -→ B n (X) τ -→ S n is a homomorphism whose kernel is H, so it induces an injective homomorphism Γ : L -→ S n . Let L ′ = Im (Γ) = Im (τ • Φ # ), and for i, j = 1, . . . , n, let L ′ i,j = {ρ ∈ L ′ | ρ(i) = j }.
The subset L ′ i,i is a subgroup of L ′ , and if i, j ∈ {1, . . . , n}, the subset L ′ i,j is either empty or is a left coset of L ′ i,i in L ′ . In the rest of this section, we will suppose without further comment that X satisfies the hypotheses of Proposition 14, so that it is a connected, locally arcwise-connected metric space. If φ : X ⊸ X is an n-valued map, we recall the Nielsen relation on Fix(φ), the index of a Nielsen fixed point class of φ and the definition of the Nielsen number N(φ) of φ from [33, Section 5]. For the definition of index, using [START_REF] Schirmer | Fix-finite approximations of n-valued multifunctions[END_REF]Theorem 6] and the homotopy invariance of the Nielsen number [32, Theorem 6.5], without loss of generality, we may restrict ourselves to the case where Fix(φ) is finite. First note that by [START_REF] Gonçalves | Fixed points of multimaps, the fixed point property and the case of surfaces -a braid approach[END_REF]Lemma 12], if λ : I -→ X is a path then the n-valued map φ • λ : I ⊸ X is split. Let x, x ′ ∈ Fix(φ). We say that x and x ′ are Nielsen equivalent if there exist maps g 1 , g 2 , . . . , g n : I -→ X, a path λ : I -→ X from λ(0) = x to λ(1) = x ′ and j ∈ {1, . . . , n} such that φ • λ = {g 1 , g 2 , . . . , g n }, and g j is a path from g j (0) = x to g j (1) = x ′ that is homotopic to λ relative to their endpoints. This defines an equivalence relation on Fix(φ), and the resulting equivalence classes are called Nielsen fixed point classes of the n-valued map φ.

To define the index of an isolated point x in Fix(φ), we suppose that X is a compact polyhedron. Following [33, Section 3], let x be in the interior of a maximal simplex σ. By [33, Splitting Lemma 2.1] φ | σ is split, so may be written in the form φ | σ = {f 1 , . . . , f n }, where x ∈ Fix(f j ) for some (unique) 1 ≤ j ≤ n. We then define Ind(φ, x) = Ind(f j , x), where the right-hand side is the usual fixed point index (see [START_REF] Schirmer | An index and a Nielsen number for n-valued multifunctions[END_REF]Sections 3 and 5] for more details). As in the single-valued case, the index of a Nielsen fixed point class of φ that contains a finite number of points is the sum of the indices of these fixed points, and such a fixed point class is said to be essential if its index is non zero. The Nielsen number N(φ) is defined to be the number of essential Nielsen fixed point classes of φ.

Remark 15. Within our framework, the maps g 1 , g 2 , . . . , g n may be chosen as follows: given x 0 , x ′ 0 ∈ Fix(φ), a point x 0 ∈ X such that q( x 0 ) = x 0 , and a path λ : I -→ X from x 0 to x ′ 0 , let λ : I -→ X be the unique lift of λ to X for which λ(0) = x 0 . Consider the n-ordered map Φ 1 = (f 1 , . . . , f n ) : X -→ F n (X) given by Proposition 14(a). Then φ • λ = {g 1 , . . . , g n }, where for i = 1, . . . , n, g i : I -→ X is the map defined by g i = f i • λ. So x 0 and x ′ 0 are Nielsen equivalent if there is a path λ as above and j ∈ {1, . . . , n} such that λ(0 1) and λ is homotopic to g j relative to their endpoints.

) = g j (0) = f j • λ(0), λ(1) = g j (1) = f j • λ(
In the following lemmas, we will compare the coincidences of q and the f i with the fixed points of φ. Lemma 16. With the above notation, let x 0 ∈ Fix(φ), let x 0 ∈ X and i ∈ {1, . . . , n} be such that q( x 0 ) = x 0 and x 0 ∈ Coin(q, f i ). If y ∈ q -1 (x 0 ) and j ∈ {1, . . . , n} then y ∈ Coin(q, f j ) if and only if Γ(α) ∈ L ′ i,j , where α is the H-coset of [q(γ)], γ being any path from x 0 to y. In particular, the points of q -1 (x 0 ) that belong to Coin(q, f i ) are in one-to-one correspondence with the subgroup L ′ i,i .

Since L ′ i,i does not depend on x 0 , Lemma 16 implies that for all x ∈ Fix(φ), the set

q -1 (x) ∩ Coin(q, f i ) has |L ′ i,i | elements.
Proof of Lemma 16. The proof makes use of basic covering space theory. Let α ∈ L be the unique deck transformation for which y is equal to the element α. x 0 of X that arises from the action of deck transformation group L on X. Then Γ(α) ∈ L ′ defines a deck transformation of the covering π : F n (X) -→ D n (X). Using the fact that q and π are covering maps and Φ 1 is a lift of Φ, we have:

Φ 1 (α. x) = Γ(α). Φ 1 ( x) (2)
for all x ∈ q -1 (x 0 ), where Γ(α). Φ 1 ( x) is the element of F n (X) arising from the action of

S n on F n (X). Since x 0 ∈ Coin(q, f i ), Φ 1 ( x 0 ) is an element of F n (X) whose i th coordinate is x 0 , and Γ(α). Φ 1 ( x 0 ) is an element of F n (X) whose Γ(α)(i) th coordinate is x 0 . So if y ∈ Coin(q, f j ), the j th coordinate of Φ 1 (y) is x 0 , and thus Γ(α) ∈ L ′ i,j . Conversely, if Γ(α) ∈ L ′
i,j then Γ(α)(i) = j, so the j th coordinate of Φ 1 (y) is x 0 , and hence y ∈ Coin(q, f j ). For the last part of the statement, since L ′ i,i is a subgroup of L ′ , it suffices to take j = i. With Lemma 16 in mind, we define the following notation. For each i ∈ {1, . . . , n}, let O i be the orbit of i by the action of the subgroup L ′ of S n on the set {1, . . . , n}, and let

I 0 = {i 1 , . . . , i s } be such that the sets {O i } i∈I 0 form a partition of {1, . . . , n}. As examples, if H = π 1 (X) (resp. L ′ = S n ) then O i = {i} (resp. O i = S n ) for all i ∈ {1, . . . , n}.
The following result underlines the relevance of these orbits. Lemma 17. With the above notation, let x 0 ∈ Fix(φ). Then there exists i ∈ {1, . . . , n} such that: j ∈ {1, . . . , n} q -1 (x 0 ) ∩ Coin(q, f j ) = ∅ = O i .

Proof. The proof uses arguments similar to those of Lemma 16. Let x 0 ∈ Fix(φ), and let x 0 ∈ X be a lift of x 0 . By Proposition 14(b), x 0 belongs to Coin(q, f i ) for some i ∈ {1, . . . , n}. First, suppose that y ∈ q -1 (x 0 ) ∩ Coin(q, f j ) for some j ∈ {1, . . . , n}, and let α ∈ L be such that α. x 0 = y. From (2), Γ(α)(i) = j, so j ∈ O i . Conversely, suppose that j ∈ O i . Then there exists α ∈ L such that Γ(α)(i) = j, and taking y = α. x 0 , we have y ∈ q -1 (x 0 ) ∩ Coin(q, f j ).

Note that by Proposition 14(b) and Lemma 17, Fix(φ) = q j∈I 0 Coin(q, f j ) . Since we wish to express the Nielsen number of φ in terms of the Nielsen coincidence numbers of the pairs (q, f i ), for the values of i belonging to I 0 , we shall compare the Nielsen coincidence relation and the Nielsen coincidence number of the pairs (q, f i ) with the Nielsen relation and the Nielsen number for φ respectively. Lemma 18. With the above notation, let i ∈ {1, . . . , n}, and let y 1 and y 2 be elements of Coin(q, f i ) that belong to the same Nielsen coincidence class of the pair (q, f i ). Then q(y 1 ) and q(y 2 ) are elements of Fix(φ) that belong to the same Nielsen fixed point class of the n-valued map φ. Further, q sends each Nielsen coincidence class of the pair (q, f i ) surjectively onto a Nielsen fixed point class of φ.

Proof. Let y 1 and y 2 be elements of Coin(q, f i ) for some i ∈ {1, . . . , n} that belong to the same Nielsen coincidence class of the pair (q, f i ). By Proposition 14(b), q(y 1 ) and q(y 2 ) are fixed points of φ. Since y 1 and y 2 belong to the same Nielsen coincidence class of (q, f i ), there exists a path λ : I -→ X from y 1 to y 2 such that the path f i • λ is homotopic in X to λ relative to the endpoints q(y 1 ) and q(y 2 ), where λ : I -→ X is the path defined by λ = q • λ. Now the n-valued map φ • λ : I ⊸ X is split by [START_REF] Gonçalves | Fixed points of multimaps, the fixed point property and the case of surfaces -a braid approach[END_REF]Lemma 12], and by Remark 15, φ • λ = {g 1 , . . . , g n }, where for j = 1, . . . , n, g j = f j • λ. So g i (0) = f i • λ(0) = f i (y 1 ) = q(y 1 ), g i (1) = f i • λ(1) = f i (y 2 ) = q(y 2 ), and g i is homotopic to λ relative to the endpoints q(y 1 ) and q(y 2 ), from which we deduce that q(y 1 ) and q(y 2 ) belong to the same Nielsen fixed point class of φ. To prove the second part of the statement, by the first part, it suffices to show that if x is a fixed point of φ that belongs to the same Nielsen fixed point class of φ as q(y 1 ) then there exists y ∈ Coin(q, f i ) such that q(y) = x, and y and y 1 belong to the same Nielsen coincidence class of the pair (q, f i ).

To see this, note that by Remark 15, there exist a path λ : I -→ X from q(y 1 ) to x, a lift λ : I -→ X such that λ(0) = y 1 and j ∈ {1, . . . , n} such that λ(0) = g j (0) = f j • λ(0), λ(1) = g j (1) = f j • λ(1), and λ is homotopic to g j relative to their endpoints. In particular, f j (y 1 ) = q(y 1 ), and so j = i because y 1 ∈ Coin(q, f i ). Further, if y = λ(1) then q(y) = x because λ is a lift of λ, and x = λ(1) = f i (y), so y ∈ Coin(q, f i ). Finally, the paths λ and g i = f i • λ are homotopic in X relative to their endpoints, and hence y 1 and y belong to the same Nielsen coincidence class of the pair (q, f i ) as required.

In order to obtain a formula for N(φ), another ingredient that we require is the number of points of q -1 (x 0 ) ∩ Coin(q, f i ) that belong to the same Nielsen coincidence class of the pair (q, f i ), where x 0 ∈ Fix(φ) and i ∈ I 0 . Suppose that q -1 (x 0 ) ∩ Coin(q, f i ) = ∅, and let x 0 , y ∈ X be elements of this intersection. There exists a unique µ ∈ L = π 1 (X)/H such that y = µ. x 0 . Let L i be the subset of L consisting of such µ as y runs over the elements of q -1 (x 0 ) ∩ Coin(q, f i ). Note that L i = {µ ∈ L | Γ(µ)(i) = i}, in particular, L i is independent of x 0 , L i is a subgroup of L, the order of L i is equal to the cardinality of q -1 (x 0 ) ∩ Coin(q, f i ), and

L ′ i,i = Γ(L i ), so L ′ i,i ∼ = L i . If µ ∈ L i ,
consider the corresponding element y ∈ q -1 (x 0 ) ∩ Coin(q, f i ) defined by y = µ. x 0 , and let γ : I -→ X be a path from x 0 to y. Then f i • γ and q • γ are loops in X based at x 0 . Let W x 0 (µ) be the subset of π 1 (X) of loop classes of the form [(q • γ) * (f i • γ) -1 ], where γ runs over the set of paths from x 0 to y. Observe that W x 0 (µ) contains the trivial element of π 1 (X) if and only if x 0 and y belong to the same Nielsen coincidence class for the pair (q, f i ). With this in mind, let K i ( x 0 ) be the set of elements y ∈ q -1 (x 0 ) ∩ Coin(q, f i ) for which W x 0 (µ) contains the trivial element, where µ ∈ L i is such that y = µ. x 0 . Then K i ( x 0 ) is the subset of elements q -1 (x 0 ) ∩ Coin(q, f i ) that belong to the same Nielsen coincidence class of the pair (q, f i ) as x 0 . Let |K i ( x 0 )| denote the cardinality of K i ( x 0 ).

Lemma 19. With the above notation, let x 0 ∈ Fix(φ), and let x 0 ∈ q -1 (x 0 ) ∩ Coin(q, f i ).

(a) The number of coincidence points of the pair (q, f i ) that belong to q -1 (x 0 ) is equal to the order of the subgroup L i . (b) If z ∈ q -1 (x 0 ) ∩ Coin(q, f i ), the set K i ( z) of points of q -1 (x 0 ) that belong to the same Nielsen coincidence class for the pair (q, f i ) as z is in one-to-one correspondence with the set K i ( x 0 ). (c) Let z ∈ Coin(q, f i ) be such that x 0 and z belong to the same Nielsen coincidence class for the pair (q, f i ). Then K i ( z) is in one-to-one correspondence with the set K i ( x 0 ).

Proof.

(a) This follows from Lemma 16 and the isomorphism L i ∼ = L ′ i,i . (b) Let us construct an injective map from K i ( x 0 ) to K i ( z). Given y ∈ K i ( x 0 ), by definition, there exists a path γ : I -→ X such that γ(0) = x 0 , γ(1) = y and q • γ is homotopic to f i • γ relative to their endpoints. Let γ 1 be the unique lift of q • γ for which γ 1 (0) = z. Since q • γ is a loop in X based at x 0 , γ 1 (1) ∈ q -1 (x 0 ). We claim that γ 1 (1) ∈ K i ( z). To see this, let us show that q • γ 1 = q • γ is homotopic to f i • γ 1 relative to their endpoints. It suffices to observe that

f i • γ = f i • γ 1 . Since the two compositions X q -→ X Φ -→ D n (X) and X Φ 1 -→ F n (X) π -→ D n (X) are equal, we have π( Φ•γ 1 ) = π( Φ•γ), in other words, the n-tuple (f 1 •γ, . . . , f n •γ) of paths is a permutation of the n-tuple (f 1 • γ 1 , . . . , f n • γ 1 ) of paths. Since these two n-tuples are paths in F n (X) and f i • γ(0) = f i • γ 1 (0) = x 0 , it follows that f i • γ = f i • γ 1 , and hence f i • γ 1 is homotopic to q • γ 1 relative to their endpoints. In particular, f i • γ 1 (1) = f i • γ(1) = q • γ(1) = q • γ 1 (1)
, so γ 1 (1) ∈ q -1 (x 0 ) ∩ Coin(q, f i ), and thus γ 1 (1) ∈ K i ( z), which proves the claim. By construction, the map from K i ( x 0 ) to K i ( z) that to y associates γ 1 (1) is injective. Exchanging the rôles of x 0 and z, we see that K i ( x 0 ) and K i ( z) have the same number of elements, and that this map is a bijection. (c) Let λ : I -→ X be a path such that λ(0) = x 0 , λ(1) = z and q • λ is homotopic to f i • λ relative to their endpoints. Let y ∈ q -1 (x 0 ) ∩ Coin(q, f i ) be a point that belongs to the same Nielsen coincidence class of (q, f i ) as x 0 , and let γ : I -→ X be a path such that γ(0) = x 0 , γ(1) = y and q • γ is homotopic to f i • γ relative to their endpoints. Let λ ′ : I -→ X be the unique lift of q • λ for which λ ′ (0) = y, and let γ ′ : I -→ X be the path defined by γ

′ = λ -1 * γ * λ ′ . Then γ ′ (0) = z, q • γ ′ (1) = q • λ ′ (1) = q • λ(1) = q( z), so γ ′ (1) ∈ q -1 (q( z)). As in the proof of part (b), q • λ ′ is homotopic to f i • λ ′ relative
to their endpoints, and it follows that q • γ ′ is homotopic to f i • γ ′ relative to their endpoints, so γ ′ (1) ∈ K i ( z). We thus obtain an injective map from K i ( x 0 ) and K i ( z) that to y associates γ ′ (1). By exchanging the rôles of x 0 and z, we see that this map is a bijection.

If i ∈ {1, . . . , n}, by Lemma 19, the set q -1 (x 0 ) ∩ Coin(q, f i ) contains |L i | points, and is partitioned into Nielsen coincidence classes of the pair (q, f i ) that each contain |K i ( x 0 )| points. So this set is partitioned into |L i |/|K i ( x 0 )| disjoint subsets each of which is contained in a Nielsen coincidence class of (q, f i ). If W 1 , W 2 are Nielsen coincidence classes of (q, f i ), we say that they are related if q(W 1 ) ∩ q(W 2 ) = ∅. This defines an equivalence relation. Let C 1 , . . . , C r denote the corresponding set of equivalence classes of the Nielsen coincidence classes of (q, f i ).

Lemma 20. With the above notation, for j = 0, 1, let x j ∈ Fix(φ), and suppose that x j ∈ q -1 (x j ) ∩ Coin(q, f i ) for some i ∈ {1, . . . , n}. If x 0 and x 1 belong to related Nielsen coincidence classes of (q, f i )

then |K i ( x 0 )| = |K i ( x 1 )|.
Proof. We shall construct a bijection between K i ( x 0 ) and K i ( x 1 ). First, we claim that there is an element x ′ 1 ∈ q -1 (q( x 1 )) that belongs to the same Nielsen coincidence class of (q, f i ) as x 0 . To see this, let x 2 , x ′ 2 ∈ Coin(q, f i ) be such that q( x 2 ) = q( x ′ 2 ), and for which x 2 (resp. x ′ 2 ) belongs to the same Nielsen coincidence class of (q, f i ) as x 0 (resp. as x 1 ). Let λ : I -→ X be a path such that λ(0) = x ′ 2 , λ(1) = x 1 and q • λ is homotopic to f i • λ relative to their endpoints, and let λ ′ : I -→ X be the unique lift of q • λ for which λ ′ (0) = x 2 , and let x ′ 1 = λ ′ (1). Then q( x ′ 1 ) = x 1 , and arguing as in the proof of Lemma 19, it follows that q • λ ′ is homotopic to f i • λ ′ relative to their endpoints. Thus x 2 and x ′ 1 belong to the same Nielsen coincidence class of (q, f i ), which proves the claim since x 2 and x 0 belong to the same Nielsen coincidence class of (q, f i ). Then by Lemma 19(b) and (c), we have

|K i ( x 0 )| = |K i ( x 2 )| = |K i ( x ′ 2 )| = |K i ( x 1
)| as required. The following lemma is a key ingredient in the process of giving a computable formula for N(φ), which is the number of essential Nielsen classes. We fix once and for all an orientation of the manifold X, and we choose the unique orientation of X for which q preserves orientation. Further, the orientation on X (resp. X) induces an orientation on any open subset of X (resp. of X), and hence a local orientation system on X (resp. on X). The map q carries the local orientation of X to that of X. The fixed point index of maps defined on open sets of X as well as the coincidence index of maps from open sets of X to X, are computed with respect to these orientations.

Lemma 21. Let X be an orientable manifold, x 0 ∈ Fix(φ) be an isolated fixed point of φ, and let x 0 ∈ X and i ∈ {1, . . . , n} be such that q( x 0 ) = x 0 and x 0 ∈ Coin(q, f i ). Then the fixed point index of φ at x 0 is equal to the coincidence index of the pair (q, f i ) at x 0 .

Proof. Since X is a manifold and X is a finite covering of X, there exists an open, contractible neighbourhood U of x 0 such that the restriction q U of q to the component U of q -1 (U) that contains x 0 is a homeomorphism. The restriction of the n-valued map φ to U is split, and a splitting is given by f 1 , . . . , f n , where f j = f j • (q U ) -1 : U -→ X for j = 1, . . . , n. So x 0 is a fixed point of the map f j for some j ∈ {1, . . . , n}, and by definition, Ind(φ, x 0 ) is equal to Ind(f j , x 0 ). Since q U is an orientation-preserving homeomorphism, Ind(f j , x 0 ) is equal to the coincidence index of the pair (q, f j ) at the coincidence x 0 , where we use the local orientation in a neighbourhood of x 0 determined by the local homeomorphism q, and this proves the lemma.

One consequence of Lemma 21 is that if a Nielsen coincidence class of (q, f i ) is sent to a Nielsen fixed point class of φ then one of these Nielsen classes is essential if and only if the other is.

Corollary 22. Under the hypothesis of Lemma 21, if C is a Nielsen coincidence class of the pair (q, f i ) and x 0 ∈ C, then the coincidence index of C is equal to |K i ( x 0 )| times the index of the fixed point class q(C) of φ.

Proof. Let C be a Nielsen coincidence class of the pair (q, f i ) for some i ∈ {1, . . . , n}. By Lemma 21, the points of C that lie in q -1 (q( x 0 )) all have the same coincidence index for the pair (q, f i ), this index being equal to Ind(φ, x 0 ). By Lemma 20, the cardinality of the set C ∩ q -1 (q( x 0 )) is equal to |K i ( x 0 )|. If x 1 is another point of C (so is Nielsen equivalent to x 0 ), the same conclusions hold, and similarly the cardinality of the set C ∩ q -1 (q( x 1 )) is equal to |K i ( x 0 )|, and all of the points of this set have the same coincidence index for the pair (q, f i ). Since the index of C is the sum of the indices over the elements of the class C, which we can assume to be finite, the result follows.

For results related with Lemma 21 and Corollary 22 and more results of similar nature, see [START_REF] Jezierski | Nielsen number of a covering map[END_REF][START_REF] Moh | The covering coincidence index and the covering Nielsen number[END_REF].

If s ∈ {1, . . . , r} and i ∈ I 0 , let m i,s = |L i |/|K i ( x s )|, where x s is an element of one of the Nielsen coincidence classes of (q, f i ) that belongs to the equivalence class C s . This quantity is the number of Nielsen coincidence classes of (q, f i ) in C s that are sent to the same Nielsen fixed point class of φ under the map q. Observe that if |L i | = 1 then m i,s = 1 for all s ∈ {1, . . . , r}.

We now come to the proof of the main result of this section.

Proof of Theorem 6. Let i j ∈ O j , where j runs over the set I 0 defined just before Lemma 17.

From Lemma 16, the image by q of Coin(q, f i j ) is independent of the choice of representative i j in O j . Since the action of L ′ i,i on {1, . . . , n} is free, |L ′ i,i | = |L i | = 1, which implies that the map induced by q between the Nielsen coincidence classes of (q, f i ) and the Nielsen fixed point classes of φ is injective for all i ∈ {1, . . . , n}. Further, if j, j ′ ∈ I 0 are distinct then q(Coin(q, f i j )) ∩ q(Coin(q, f i j ′ )) = ∅ by Lemma 16, and we conclude that the map between the union of the Nielsen coincidence classes of the pairs (q, f i j ), where i j ∈ I 0 , and the Nielsen fixed point classes of φ is injective too. This map is also surjective by Proposition 14(b) and Lemma 18. By Corollary 22, a coincidence class of (q, f i j ) is essential if and only if its image under q is essential. From this, it follows that N(φ) is equal to j∈I 0 N(q, f i j ).

If the space X is a non-orientable manifold, the situation is more complex, and it is not clear for the moment how to obtain a formula similar to that of Theorem 6 in this case. In the case n = 2, the hypothesis of that theorem on the action of L i is always satisfied.

Corollary 23. Let X be an orientable compact manifold without boundary and φ : X ⊸ X a non-split 2-valued map. Then N(φ) = N(q, f 1 ) = N(q, f 2 ).

Proof. Since φ is non-split, L ∼ = L ′ ∼ = Z 2 , there is a single orbit O 1 = {1, 2}, and |L 1 | = |L 2 | = 1. Then by Theorem 6, N(φ) = N(q, f j ) for all j ∈ {1, 2}.

Theorem 7 .

 7 Let X and Y be metric spaces, and let n ∈ N. (a) An n-valued function φ : X ⊸ Y is continuous if and only if the corresponding function Φ : X -→ D n (Y ) is continuous. (b) The set of homotopy classes of n-valued maps from X to Y is in one-to-one correspondence with the set [X, D n (Y )] of homotopy classes of maps from X to D n (Y ).

Remark 8 .

 8 Theorem 7 also holds under weaker hypotheses. (a) If we assume just that Y is a metric space, then the statement of Theorem 7(a) is [12, Corollary 4.1], and that of Theorem 7(b) follows by applying this corollary to the spaces X × I and Y . (b) If X is just locally path-connected and semi-locally simply connected then so is X ×I. The statement of Theorem 7(a) is [12, Corollary 3.1], and that of Theorem 7(b) follows by applying this corollary to the spaces X × I and Y .

2. 1

 1 The case of n-valued maps of the 2-disc Proposition 9. The 2-disc D 2 has the Wecken property for n-valued maps for all n ∈ N.

  (a) The sets [RP 2 , F n (RP 2 )], [RP 2 , D n (RP 2 )] and Spl(RP 2 , RP 2 , n)/ ∼ are in bijection, and each possesses two elements. (b) The two homotopy classes of n-valued maps of RP 2 may be described as follows:

  and since the orbit of the homotopy class [c] of the constant map under the action of S n must be {[c]}, the orbit of [α] must be {[α]}. It follows that Spl(RP 2 , RP 2 , n)/ ∼ has precisely two elements. (b

  2 ,

	p
	U P	W P
	U P H + P

p for which W P = p • W ′ P also. The following lemma summarises various properties of W P . Lemma 12. Let P ∈ S 2 . The map W P : RP 2 -→ RP 2 satisfies the following properties: (a) W P = W -P , and Fix(W P ) = {p(P )}. (b) The map W P is non null-homotopic, so it belongs to the non-constant homotopy class of [RP 2 , RP 2 ] that induces the trivial homomorphism on the fundamental group. (c) Let P 1 , P 2 ∈ S 2 . If P 1 = ±P 2 , then Coin(W P 1 , W P 2 ) is empty. (d) If c 0 : RP 2 -→ RP 2 is a constant map then the pair (W P , c 0 ) cannot be deformed to a coincidence-free pair.

Preliminaries and the Wecken property for n-valued maps of the 2-disc and 2-sphere

Acknowledgements

The first-named author was partially supported by FAPESP-Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, Projeto Temático Topologia Algébrica, Geométrica e Diferencial 2012/24454-8. The second-named author was also partially supported by the same project as well as the CNRS/FAPESP PRC project n o 275209 during his visit to the Instituto de Matemática e Estatística, Universidade de São Paulo, from the 4 th to the 22 nd of February 2017.