Karin Heidlmayr
email: karin.heidlmayr@univ-tours.fr

Emmanuel Ferragne

Frédéric Isel

Neuroplasticity in the phonological system: The PMN and the N400 as markers for the perception of non-native phonemic contrasts by late second language learners

Keywords: second language acquisition, neuroplasticity, phonology, semantic unification, PMN, N400 1

Second language (L2) learners frequently encounter persistent difficulty in perceiving certain non-native sound contrasts, i.e., a phenomenon called "phonological deafness". However, if extensive L2 experience leads to neuroplastic changes in the phonological system, then the capacity to discriminate non-native phonemic contrasts should progressively improve. Such perceptual changes should be attested by modifications at the neurophysiological level. We designed an EEG experiment in which the listeners' perceptual capacities to discriminate second language phonemic contrasts influence the processing of lexical-semantic violations.

Semantic congruency of critical words in a sentence context was driven by a phonemic contrast that was unique to the L2, English (e.g., /ɪ/ -/i:/, shipsheep). Twenty-eight young adult native speakers of French with intermediate proficiency in English listened to sentences that contained either a semantically congruent or incongruent critical word (e.g., The anchor of the ship/*sheep was let down) while EEG was recorded. Three ERP effects were found to relate to increasing L2 proficiency: (1) a left frontal auditory N100 effect, (2) a smaller fronto-central phonological mismatch negativity (PMN) effect and (3) a semantic N400 effect. No effect of proficiency was found on oscillatory markers. The current findings suggest that neuronal plasticity in the human brain allows for the late acquisition of even hard-wired linguistic features such as the discrimination of phonemic contrasts in a second language. This is the first time that behavioral and neurophysiological evidence for the critical role of neural plasticity underlying L2 phonological processing and its interdependence with semantic processing has been provided. Our data strongly support the idea that pieces of information from different levels of linguistic processing (e.g., phonological, semantic) strongly interact and influence each other during online language processing.

Introduction

Late second language (L2) learners often experience persistent difficulty in perceiving and producing specific phoneme contrasts in their L2 (e.g., [START_REF] Cutler | Native listening: language experience and the recognition of spoken words[END_REF]. This reduced capacity to discriminate non-native phonemes is often called "phonological deafness" [START_REF] Polivanov | La perception des sons d'une langue étrangère[END_REF] (also referred to as "phonological reorganization" [START_REF] Best | Examination of perceptual reorganization for nonnative speech contrasts: Zulu click discrimination by English-speaking adults and infants[END_REF]Werker andTees, 2005, 1984) or "phonological narrowing" [START_REF] Lewkowicz | Infants deploy selective attention to the mouth of a talking face when learning speech[END_REF]) and illustrated by [START_REF] Troubetzkoy | Principes de phonologie[END_REF] with the metaphor of "phonological screen". Interestingly, this selective perception may not be irreversible as suggested by previous phonetic studies reporting evidence of plasticity in the phonological system of adults [START_REF] Best | Effects of phonological and phonetic factors on cross-language perception of approximants[END_REF][START_REF] Flege | Effects of experience on non-native speakers' production and perception of English vowels[END_REF][START_REF] Iverson | Auditory training for experienced and inexperienced second-language learners: Native French speakers learning English vowels[END_REF]. In particular, sensitivity to non-native sounds can be improved after short-term exposure when listeners directly experience these sounds in a social interaction with native speakers [START_REF] Kuhl | Foreign-language experience in infancy: Effects of short-term exposure and social interaction on phonetic learning[END_REF]. This indicates that even late learners of a second language are able to learn to perceive and produce phonemes that are not part of their native phoneme repertoire. In the present study, our main goal was to investigate the degree to which the neural basis of the phonological system remains sufficiently malleable beyond early infancy and would thus allow for the acquisition of non-native phonemic contrasts in a second language.

Neurocognitive constraints in first and second language acquisition

In language development, during the first year of life, children improve their capacity to discriminate sounds from their native language(s) and begin to lose the capacity to discriminate phonemic contrasts that are not relevant to the language(s) in acquisition [START_REF] Kuhl | Early language acquisition: cracking the speech code[END_REF][START_REF] Sebastian-Galles | Native-language sensitivities: evolution in the first year of life[END_REF][START_REF] Werker | Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life[END_REF]. These very early changes in the phonological system are crucial for the later success at language acquisition (Native language neural commitment (NLNC) hypothesis; [START_REF] Kuhl | Early language acquisition: cracking the speech code[END_REF], but produce the "phonological deafness" effect [START_REF] Polivanov | La perception des sons d'une langue étrangère[END_REF], mentioned above. The reasons for this difficulty to discriminate and to learn to discriminate non-native sounds in perception and production [START_REF] Cutler | Native listening: language experience and the recognition of spoken words[END_REF][START_REF] Dupoux | Persistent stress 'deafness': The case of French learners of Spanish[END_REF][START_REF] Flege | Perceiving vowels in a second language[END_REF][START_REF] Sebastián-Gallés | The influence of initial exposure on lexical representation: Comparing early and simultaneous bilinguals[END_REF] have been argued to reside in a difficulty to create non-native phonological representations later in life, rather than in a perceptual problem (e.g., [START_REF] Dupoux | Persistent stress 'deafness': The case of French learners of Spanish[END_REF]. Nevertheless, the poor discrimination capacity for non-native sound contrasts does not appear to be fixated once and for all. There is evidence for the possibility to improve this capacity with second language experience [START_REF] Best | Effects of phonological and phonetic factors on cross-language perception of approximants[END_REF][START_REF] Flege | Effects of experience on non-native speakers' production and perception of English vowels[END_REF][START_REF] Iverson | Auditory training for experienced and inexperienced second-language learners: Native French speakers learning English vowels[END_REF] and even to retune the discrimination capacity of the phonological system from the first to the second language [START_REF] Ventureyra | The loss of first language phonetic perception in adopted Koreans[END_REF]. In the present study, we aimed to test this plasticity of the phonological system as a function of second language experience. Late second language acquisition (SLA) has been defined as the acquisition of a language beyond the age of three by some authors [START_REF] Hakuta | Bilingualism and Multilingualism[END_REF], while others set the critical age much higher, at puberty [START_REF] Klein | Language acquisition at different ages[END_REF]. SLA has been argued, on the one hand, to share some of the general-purpose neural learning mechanisms with first language (L1) acquisition [START_REF] Hamrick | Child first language and adult second language are both tied to general-purpose learning systems[END_REF][START_REF] Klein | Mechanismen des Erst-und Zweitspracherwerbs[END_REF]. On the other hand, late SLA has also been shown to be determined by considerably different neurocognitive constraints from those involved in early language acquisition (for a review, see [START_REF] Meisel | First and second language acquisition: Parallels and differences[END_REF]. Late SLA seems to require more effortful, implicit or explicit, learning strategies in order to integrate the novel language into the neurocognitive language network, which is already committed to the native language [START_REF] Hernandez | Age of acquisition: Its neural and computational mechanisms[END_REF][START_REF] Morgan-Short | Explicit and Implicit Second Language Training Differentially Affect the Achievement of Native-like Brain Activation Patterns[END_REF]. These different preconditions in late SLA are caused by neural maturation, early learning experience and socio-psychological constraints [START_REF] Kuhl | Neural substrates of language acquisition[END_REF][START_REF] Newport | Critical thinking about critical periods: Perspectives on a critical period for language acquisition. Language, brain and cognitive development: Essays in honor of Jacques Mehler[END_REF]. However, the theoretical proposal according to which adult learners of L2 achieve native-like knowledge and proficiency only in rare cases, if at all, has been seriously questioned on the basis of neuroimaging data which reveal that neuroplastic changes underlie second language learning success (see for example, [START_REF] Li | Second language learning success revealed by brain networks[END_REF]lexical level) or by neurophysiological sentence processing data [START_REF] Caffarra | Second language syntactic processing revealed through event-related potentials: An empirical review[END_REF][START_REF] Morgan-Short | Electrophysiological Approaches to Understanding Second Language Acquisition: A Field Reaching its Potential[END_REF](morpho)syntactic level; [START_REF] Hahne | What's different in second-language processing? Evidence from eventrelated brain potentials[END_REF][START_REF] Isel | Special issue in honour of Elizabeth Bates. First-and second-language processing: Cross-linguistic neurophysiological evidence[END_REF]; syntactic and semantic levels among others). Importantly, over the course of L2 acquisition, quantitative and qualitative shifts in the neurophysiological signature have been observed with developing L2 competence. Higher proficiency and longer L2 exposure as well as earlier L2 age of acquisition and an extensive implicit learning context are often associated with the emergence of more native-like ERP signatures, notably for (morpho)syntactic processing [START_REF] Caffarra | Second language syntactic processing revealed through event-related potentials: An empirical review[END_REF][START_REF] Morgan-Short | Electrophysiological Approaches to Understanding Second Language Acquisition: A Field Reaching its Potential[END_REF], reflecting an increased automatization of L2 processing [START_REF] Ullman | The Declarative/Procedural Model: A Neurobiologically-Motivated Theory of First and Second Language[END_REF]. The observation that especially proficiency level and extensive L2 exposure in adult L2 learning can modulate neurophysiological markers in response to syntactic analysis lends support to the theoretical perspective that language use and experience can enable the emergence of grammatical rules and other formal aspects beyond an early age of acquisition [START_REF] Behrens | Usage-based and emergentist approaches to language acquisition[END_REF][START_REF] Caffarra | Second language syntactic processing revealed through event-related potentials: An empirical review[END_REF][START_REF] Mitchell | Second language learning theories[END_REF]. However, the potential changes in the neurophysiological signature of phonological processing and its interaction with lexical-semantic and (morpho)syntactic processes over the course of L2 acquisition are less well known.

Models of non-native speech perception

What are the neurocognitive mechanisms and changes that would enable late second language learners to handle L2 phonological specificities, at least to some degree? According to the Perceptual assimilation model (PAM-L2; [START_REF] Best | A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception[END_REF][START_REF] Best | Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities[END_REF] non-native sounds are perceived according to their distance to the articulatory properties of native sounds. The specific L2 sounds are assimilated to already existing phonemic categories created during native language acquisition. In contrast, according to the Speech learning model (SLM; [START_REF] Flege | Interactions between the native and second-language phonetic systems[END_REF][START_REF] Flege | Second-language speech learning: Findings, and problems[END_REF], novel phonetic categories can be created for non-native phonetic representations, under the condition that a difference between the new L2 phoneme and the closest L1 sound can be perceived by the L2 learner. In other words, the creation of new phonetic categories depends on the cross-language phonetic distance but also on the state of development of L1 phonetic categories in the L2 learner's phonological system, because the L1 phonetic categories become stronger attractors for L2 phonemes the more consolidated they are [START_REF] Flege | Perceiving vowels in a second language[END_REF]. Thus, both PAM-L2 and SLM predict that despite the decreasing capacity to discriminate non-native phonemic contrasts after the first years of life, the phonological system remains plastic to a certain degree, but the two theoretical positions diverge with respect to the mechanisms of this late plasticity (see also, [START_REF] Best | Effects of phonological and phonetic factors on cross-language perception of approximants[END_REF][START_REF] Best | Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities[END_REF][START_REF] Flege | Effects of experience on non-native speakers' production and perception of English vowels[END_REF].

The originality of the present study was to approach the issue of phonological processing in late second language learners by relying on the mechanism of lexical-semantic integration. More precisely, to examine the extent to which second language learners were sensitive to phonological variation in their L2, we created lexical-semantic incongruities based on phonological changes using a semantic violation paradigm [START_REF] Kutas | Thirty Years and Counting: Finding Meaning in the N400 Component of the Event-Related Brain Potential (ERP)[END_REF][START_REF] Kutas | Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity[END_REF]. Concretely, the difference between semantically congruent and incongruent items was implemented by a phonemic contrast that was unique to the L2, English (e.g., /ɪ/ -/i:/, shipsheep). Three English phonemic contrasts that are either non phonemic in French -/ɪ/-/i:/ (e.g., ship -sheep) and /s/-/θ/ (e.g., mouse -mouth) -or implemented differently on the phonetic level in the two languages -/r/-/w/ (e.g., rest -west) -were selected. The articulatory-phonetic characteristics of the English /r/ are phonetically quite similar to the French /w/ and can thus lead to a perceptual bias towards the French /w/, which makes the distinction between /r/-/w/ more difficult for French native speakers [START_REF] Hallé | Phonetic vs. phonological influences on French listeners: perception of American English approximants[END_REF]. Concerning the /ɪ/-/i:/ contrast, these vowels are known to be mutually confusable by French learners [START_REF] Iverson | Auditory training for experienced and inexperienced second-language learners: Native French speakers learning English vowels[END_REF] because there is no phonemic boundary in the French system that would perfectly match the English one. Finally, there is no /s/-/θ/ contrast in French, both sounds being often categorized as /s/ by French learners [START_REF] Picard | The differential substitution of English /θ ð/ in French: The case against underspecification in L2 phonology[END_REF]. According to PAM-L2 [START_REF] Best | A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception[END_REF][START_REF] Best | Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities[END_REF], for these three phonemic contrasts, the phonemes that do not exist in the L1 but only in the L2 would tend to be assimilated to the most similar L1 phoneme, which corresponds to the respectively other phoneme in the current contrasts, by an L2 learner (see also, Cruttenden, 2014, p. 200). If the non-native phoneme is assimilated to the closest L1 phoneme and no distinct phonemic category is established, no clear semantic violation effect should be observed, and this independently of the proficiency level of L2. If, however, with increasing L2 proficiency, new phonemic categories are constructed for non-native phonemes (see also, SLM; [START_REF] Flege | Interactions between the native and second-language phonetic systems[END_REF][START_REF] Flege | Second-language speech learning: Findings, and problems[END_REF], the highly proficient L2 learner should be able to detect the semantic violation.

Experimental evidence for neuroplasticity in the phonological system

Behavioral studies investigating non-native phoneme discrimination have produced heterogeneous results. [START_REF] Broersma | Competition dynamics of second-language listening[END_REF] observed lexical priming effects that were based on a lack of discrimination between two non-native phonemes, even in proficient L2 speakers. [START_REF] Pallier | A limit on behavioral plasticity in speech perception[END_REF] showed that native speakers of Spanish who were fluent in Catalan were on average not able to discriminate isolated vowels constituting a phonemic contrast in Catalan. However, there was considerable inter-individual variability in performance and some non-native individuals showed native-like discrimination performance. Indeed, [START_REF] Flege | Perceiving vowels in a second language[END_REF] observed that some factors linked to language biography are strong predictors of the success in non-native phonological processing: early L2 AoA and a reduced frequency of L1 usage (higher frequency of L2 usage) were related to a better discrimination of non-native phoneme contrasts. These findings underline the importance of taking into account individual differences in language biography when studying non-native speech processing. Moreover, striking experimental evidence for plasticity in the phonological system during SLA has been provided with specifically targeted phonetic training paradigms that proved successful for improving non-native vowel discrimination on the behavioral level [START_REF] Iverson | Auditory training for experienced and inexperienced second-language learners: Native French speakers learning English vowels[END_REF].

Moreover, neurophysiological studies have demonstrated an increased neural response in the auditory cortex following a targeted phonological discrimination training. For instance, in a magnetoencephalographical (MEG) study, a training-related increase of the amplitude of the mismatch negativity field (MMF) was observed [START_REF] Menning | Plasticity of the Human Auditory Cortex Induced by Discrimination Learning of Non-Native, Mora-Timed Contrasts of the Japanese Language[END_REF]. Similarly, in an EEG study, an increase of the amplitudes of an event-related potential (ERP) marker peaking at about 130 ms and localized in the right auditory cortex, and of a second ERP component peaking at around 340 ms and localized in the right anterior superior temporal gyrus and/or inferior prefrontal cortex were found to be related to an increase of the behavioral L2 phoneme discrimination capacity [START_REF] Alain | Changes in auditory cortex parallel rapid perceptual learning[END_REF]. Moreover, in an fMRI study on lexical learning of Mandarin Chinese by Dutch native speakers, good learners compared to poor learners showed increased functional connectivity (temporal correlations between the hemodynamic activity of different areas) already before learning onset between areas important for phonological processing, i.e. between the left supplementary motor area and the left precentral gyrus as well as the left insula and the left Rolandic operculum [START_REF] Veroude | Functional connectivity between brain regions involved in learning words of a new language[END_REF]. Increased functional connectivity in good compared to poor learners was also found after learning, namely between the left and right supramarginal gyrus. This study demonstrates that pre-existing as well as learning-induced functional connectivity characteristics distinguish good from poor L2 learners [START_REF] Veroude | Functional connectivity between brain regions involved in learning words of a new language[END_REF].

Furthermore, important insight comes from studies investigating structural brain characteristics in bilingualism and their changes with L2 acquisition. L2 proficiency was found to be positively correlated with gray matter (GM) density in the left inferior parietal cortex [START_REF] Mechelli | Neurolinguistics: structural plasticity in the bilingual brain[END_REF], whereas age of L2 acquisition (L2 AoA) showed a negative correlation with GM density in this region [START_REF] Mechelli | Neurolinguistics: structural plasticity in the bilingual brain[END_REF]. Higher L2 AoA was also associated with reinforced white matter connectivity (fractional anisotropy) in the corpus callosum, which is thought to reflect higher processing efficiency with earlier L2 AoA [START_REF] Deluca | Redefining bilingualism as a spectrum of experiences that differentially affects brain structure and function[END_REF].

Moreover, short-term intense L2 learning was found to be related to an increase in GM density in, among others, the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) [START_REF] Mårtensson | Growth of language-related brain areas after foreign language learning[END_REF][START_REF] Stein | Structural plasticity in the language system related to increased second language proficiency[END_REF], and to an increase in inter-hemispheric white matter connectivity [START_REF] Schlegel | White matter structure changes as adults learn a second language[END_REF]. Finally, with intensive language learning, L2 proficiency-related laterality shifts in structural connectivity in the perisylvian language network have been observed [START_REF] Xiang | L2-Proficiency-Dependent Laterality Shift in Structural Connectivity of Brain Language Pathways[END_REF]. In less proficient L2 speakers, structural connectivity in the frontal (BA6) to temporal pathway (mainly along the arcuate fasciculus) showed a right hemispheric dominance while with increasing proficiency, a stronger left hemispheric dominance emerged. The stronger right hemispheric dominance in less proficient L2-learners was suggested to reflect the recruitment of additional right-hemisphere areas during phonological processing [START_REF] Xiang | L2-Proficiency-Dependent Laterality Shift in Structural Connectivity of Brain Language Pathways[END_REF].

To sum up, there is evidence in behavior, neurophysiology as well as in neuroimaging that late second language acquisition and L2 proficiency are associated with functional and structural changes especially in the left-lateralized language network. These neural changes often involve regions that are crucial in phonological processing, among others the superior temporal cortex, and their connectivity with other frontotemporal and parietal regions of the language network, suggesting the critical role of phonological processing and of neural changes in its underlying neural network during L2 learning.

The present study

In the present electroencephalographic (EEG) study, our main goal was to investigate (1) if the plasticity in the neurocognitive phonological system allows late L2 learners to reach L2 phoneme discrimination capacity, as assessed via neurophysiological language markers (for a review, see [START_REF] Friederici | The brain basis of language processing: from structure to function[END_REF] that reflect automatic sound deviance detection (phonological mismatch negativity (PMN); [START_REF] Connolly | Event-Related Potential Components Reflect Phonological and Semantic Processing of the Terminal Word of Spoken Sentences[END_REF] and phonology-mediated semantic unification (N400; [START_REF] Hagoort | Semantic unification[END_REF][START_REF] Kutas | Thirty Years and Counting: Finding Meaning in the N400 Component of the Event-Related Brain Potential (ERP)[END_REF] and (2) which factors in the linguistic biography of L2 learners (e.g., frequency of L2 usage, age of L2 acquisition, L2 proficiency, duration of immersion in an L2 environment) may best predict the L2 phonological processing capacity. Here, we combined behavioral and electrophysiological measures in order to obtain insight into the temporally fine-grained online processing of word-and sentence-embedded non-native phonemes. Furthermore, the investigation of the impact of individual differences in the language biography was intended to disentangle critical factors that predict the success in non-native speech processing.

We designed an event-related potential (ERP) experiment in which the capacity of listeners to discriminate second language phonemic contrasts mediated lexical access. This paradigm allowed us to study the perception of non-native phonemic contrasts in a sentential context. The rationale for this methodological choice was to study this question in a more ecological situation of language processing, i.e., with short sentences rather than isolated words or phonemes. In natural language processing, the perceptual system does not deal with isolated phonemic contrasts but on the contrary has to process these contrasts by taking into consideration linguistic information provided by other levels of linguistic analysis. This analysis of the speech signal is realized in a bidirectional way, i.e., in a bottom-up and a topdown manner. A semantic violation paradigm was used in which the difference between semantically congruent and incongruent items was implemented via a phonemic contrast that was unique to the L2, English, (e.g., /ɪ/ -/i:/, shipsheep) but that did not exist in the L1, French. Participants listened to sentences that contained either a semantically congruent item (e.g., The anchor of the ship was let down) or an incongruent one (e.g., *The anchor of the sheep was let down) and were asked to perform an acceptability judgement.

Phonological mismatch negativity (PMN)

In order to assess if the processing system of L2 learners had developed a native-like capacity to detect deviant phonemes with respect to their predictions based on the sentence context, the phonological mismatch negativity (PMN; also referred to as phonological mapping negativity; [START_REF] Connolly | Event-Related Potential Components Reflect Phonological and Semantic Processing of the Terminal Word of Spoken Sentences[END_REF][START_REF] Newman | Electrophysiological markers of pre-lexical speech processing: Evidence for bottom-up and top-down effects on spoken word processing[END_REF] was considered here as one of the relevant neurophysiological marker of interest. The PMN is a frontal, central to leftlateralized negativity peaking around 200-300 after stimulus onset that is sensitive to phonological processing of spoken words/nonwords [START_REF] Connolly | Event-Related Potential Components Reflect Phonological and Semantic Processing of the Terminal Word of Spoken Sentences[END_REF][START_REF] Kujala | Activation in the anterior left auditory cortex associated with phonological analysis of speech input: localization of the phonological mismatch negativity response with MEG[END_REF][START_REF] Newman | Electrophysiological markers of pre-lexical speech processing: Evidence for bottom-up and top-down effects on spoken word processing[END_REF]. Interestingly, sometimes the PMN is discussed in terms of an auditory mismatch negativity (MMN). The MMN is a fronto-central negativity peaking at around 150-250 ms after stimulus onset. It has been found to show a taskindependent automatic response, in the form of a larger amplitude, in response to deviant (speech) sounds [START_REF] Garrido | The mismatch negativity: A review of underlying mechanisms[END_REF][START_REF] Näätänen | The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: a review[END_REF][START_REF] Näätänen | Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted[END_REF][START_REF] Pulvermüller | Language outside the focus of attention: The mismatch negativity as a tool for studying higher cognitive processes[END_REF]. The MMN component is typically found in oddball paradigms for individual phonemes or sounds. However, not only perceptual features but also the (linguistic) context and naturalistic occurrence statistics seem to influence this auditory deviance detection. For instance, it has been found to be influenced by information about the probability with which a given sound follows another (transitional probability) [START_REF] Mittag | Transitional Probabilities Are Prioritized over Stimulus/Pattern Probabilities in Auditory Deviance Detection: Memory Basis for Predictive Sound Processing[END_REF] and by cognitive and linguistic information, such as semantic or syntactic information [START_REF] Pulvermüller | Language outside the focus of attention: The mismatch negativity as a tool for studying higher cognitive processes[END_REF]. Furthermore, a late MMN can be elicited by complex auditory stimuli like syllables and words [START_REF] Czamara | Association of a Rare Variant with Mismatch Negativity in a Region Between KIAA0319 and DCDC2 in Dyslexia[END_REF]. Importantly, the two components, PMN and MMN, differ on several aspects: Whereas the MMN is dependent on the frequency of stimulus occurrence, this is not the case for the PMN [START_REF] Connolly | Event-Related Potential Components Reflect Phonological and Semantic Processing of the Terminal Word of Spoken Sentences[END_REF].

Moreover, whereas the neural generators of the PMN have been localized in left frontotemporal regions [START_REF] Kujala | Activation in the anterior left auditory cortex associated with phonological analysis of speech input: localization of the phonological mismatch negativity response with MEG[END_REF], the generators of the MMN have been found more posteriorly in the bilateral temporal cortex, involving the primary auditory cortex, and in the prefrontal cortex, left-lateralized in the case of language paradigms (for a review, see [START_REF] Garrido | The mismatch negativity: A review of underlying mechanisms[END_REF]. In the present design, the PMN is a valuable marker to identify if L2 learners process contextualized phonetic contrasts as phonemes belonging to the same or to different phonemic categories.

N400

The second ERP component of interest to -indirectly -assess the learners' capacity to discriminate L2 phonemes in our paradigm was the N400. In ERP research, the N400 component is a negative-going component at posterior sites peaking at around 400 ms after stimulus onset. In psycholinguistics, this ERP component was first shown by [START_REF] Kutas | Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity[END_REF] see also [START_REF] Federmeier | Time for meaning: Electrophysiology provides insights into the dynamics of representation and processing in semantic memory[END_REF]Kutas andFedermeier, 2011, 2000) to reflect difficulties of lexical semantic integration (e.g., He spread the warm bread with *socks.) during the visual integration of words in English sentences. An N400 effect, i.e., a more negative amplitude in a (semantically) incongruent as compared to a congruent condition is usually found in the time window 200-600 ms after stimulus onset and is largest over centro-parietal sites. The amplitude of the N400 component is thought to be related to semantic properties of words and is sensitive to a range of linguistic and non-linguistic stimuli [START_REF] Kutas | Thirty Years and Counting: Finding Meaning in the N400 Component of the Event-Related Brain Potential (ERP)[END_REF]. Variations in the N400 amplitude have been associated with a variety of neurocognitive functions and processes in different languages, such as lexical-semantic integration in sentences (German: [START_REF] Friederici | Event-related brain potentials during natural speech processing: effects of semantic, morphological and syntactic violations[END_REF]French: Isel et al., 2007; English: [START_REF] Kutas | Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity[END_REF], semantic/conceptual unification [START_REF] Hagoort | The core and beyond in the language-ready brain[END_REF][START_REF] Hagoort | Semantic unification[END_REF], lexical access (Van Petten and [START_REF] Van Petten | Interactions between sentence context and word frequency in event-related brain potentials[END_REF], binding [START_REF] Federmeier | Time for meaning: Electrophysiology provides insights into the dynamics of representation and processing in semantic memory[END_REF], orthographic/phonological analysis [START_REF] Deacon | Repetition and semantic priming of nonwords: implications for theories of N400 and word recognition[END_REF], or semantic memory access [START_REF] Kutas | Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension[END_REF][START_REF] Van Berkum | The neuropragmatics of 'simple' utterance comprehension: An ERP review[END_REF]; for reviews, see [START_REF] Kutas | Thirty Years and Counting: Finding Meaning in the N400 Component of the Event-Related Brain Potential (ERP)[END_REF][START_REF] Lau | A cortical network for semantics: (de)constructing the N400[END_REF]. The typical semantic N400 is mainly generated by superior and middle temporal, anterior temporal, medial temporal and dorsolateral frontal regions (for a review, see [START_REF] Kutas | Thirty Years and Counting: Finding Meaning in the N400 Component of the Event-Related Brain Potential (ERP)[END_REF]. If the processed language stimuli are however presented in the L2 rather than the L1, the N400 may differ from the typical characteristics presented above. For instance, compared to language processing in the L1, the N400 onset and peak latencies can be delayed in the L2 of late second language learners [START_REF] Isel | Syntactic and referential processes in second-language learners: event-related brain potential evidence[END_REF][START_REF] Midgley | Language effects in second language learners and proficient bilinguals investigated with event-related potentials[END_REF][START_REF] Newman | The Influence of Language Proficiency on Lexical Semantic Processing in Native and Late Learners of English[END_REF]Weber-Fox and Neville, 1996) and the N400 amplitude may be smaller in the L2 [START_REF] Liang | The impact of language proficiency on the time course and neural basis of L2 semantic access in bilinguals[END_REF][START_REF] Midgley | Language effects in second language learners and proficient bilinguals investigated with event-related potentials[END_REF][START_REF] Newman | The Influence of Language Proficiency on Lexical Semantic Processing in Native and Late Learners of English[END_REF]see also, Ito et al., 2017). However, these latency and amplitude differences between L2 and L1 seem to decrease with L2 proficiency [START_REF] Liang | The impact of language proficiency on the time course and neural basis of L2 semantic access in bilinguals[END_REF][START_REF] Midgley | Language effects in second language learners and proficient bilinguals investigated with event-related potentials[END_REF].

Time-frequency representations (TFR)

Beside ERPs, we were also interested in the oscillatory activity, i.e., the time-frequency representations (TFR) associated with L2 phonological and lexical-semantic processing. In recent years, the investigation of neural oscillations has provided increasing insight into the neural processes underlying prediction and unification in language processing. However, less is known about the oscillatory activity during second language processing. Two frequency bands, namely the beta and lower gamma band, were of particular interest in the present study in order to investigate phonological and semantic processing at the sentence-embedded critical word.

Previously, beta band oscillations (14-30 Hz) have been associated with the maintenance of a status quo in the motor and the cognitive domain [START_REF] Engel | Beta-band oscillations-signalling the status quo?[END_REF][START_REF] Lewis | A predictive coding framework for rapid neural dynamics during sentence-level language comprehension[END_REF]. During sentence processing, activity in the beta frequency range has been suggested to reflect the active synchronization and maintenance of the current network configuration to represent sentence-level meaning under construction and the propagation of prediction to lower levels of processing [START_REF] Arnal | Cortical oscillations and sensory predictions[END_REF][START_REF] Lewis | A predictive coding framework for rapid neural dynamics during sentence-level language comprehension[END_REF]. Semantic violations have previously been found to elicit a beta power decrease in comparison to semantically legal sentences [START_REF] Kielar | Oscillatory Responses to Semantic and Syntactic Violations[END_REF][START_REF] Luo | Electroencephalogram oscillations differentiate semantic and prosodic processes during sentence reading[END_REF][START_REF] Wang | Beta oscillations relate to the N400m during language comprehension[END_REF], in a time window that is very similar to the event-related N400 [START_REF] Wang | Beta oscillations relate to the N400m during language comprehension[END_REF]. Moreover, meaning processing at the sentence level has also been associated with oscillatory activity in the gamma range, in that low and middle gamma was suggested to reflect the matching of top-down predictions with bottom-up linguistic input [START_REF] Lewis | A predictive coding framework for rapid neural dynamics during sentence-level language comprehension[END_REF]. In the lower gamma range (30-45 Hz) power reductions were observed for semantic violations compared to legal target words in a sentence context [START_REF] Penolazzi | Gamma EEG activity induced by semantic violation during sentence reading[END_REF]. Similarly, [START_REF] Wang | Gamma Oscillatory Activity Related to Language Prediction[END_REF] observed a correlation between the gamma power during the prediction and the activation periods of predicted target words in a sentence context, which was not the case for unpredicted target words.

With respect to phonological mismatch, previous studies have also associated power modulations in the beta frequency band with the top-down transmission of predictions but also with the rhythmic modulation of sensory sampling [START_REF] Arnal | Cortical oscillations and sensory predictions[END_REF], with beta power increase being associated with stronger predictions [START_REF] Scharinger | Linguistic category structure influences early auditory processing: Converging evidence from mismatch responses and cortical oscillations[END_REF]. Moreover, beta power modulations have been found to reflect the strength of categorical speech percepts, in that beta power was positively related to the slope of listeners' psychometric identification function from ambiguous to prototypical phonemes with respect to their phonemic categories (higher beta power was found for the identification of more prototypical phonemes; [START_REF] Bidelman | Induced neural beta oscillations predict categorical speech perception abilities[END_REF].

Hypotheses

To our knowledge, this study constitutes the first attempt in the laboratory to investigate the discrimination capacity of L2 phonemes in a more ecological manner, in that it targets the interaction of phonological and lexical-semantic processes in sentence context. This was done by measuring the neural response (ERP; TFR) in a semantic violation paradigm, in which the semantic violations were (1) phonologically mediated vs (2) purely non-phonological lexicalsemantic, as a control. As for the phonological level of manipulation, if during L2 acquisition new phonemic categories can be established for the non-native phonemes (see also, SLM; [START_REF] Flege | Interactions between the native and second-language phonetic systems[END_REF][START_REF] Flege | Second-language speech learning: Findings, and problems[END_REF], L2 learners, especially those who are highly proficient, should be able to detect a phonologically mediated semantic violation. If, however, the non-native phoneme remains assimilated to the closest L1 phoneme and no distinct phonemic category is established (PAM-L2; [START_REF] Best | A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception[END_REF][START_REF] Best | Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities[END_REF], no semantic violation effect should be observed (for a discussion on phonetic perceptual discrimination underlying lexical discrimination see, [START_REF] Cutler | Representation of second language phonology[END_REF]. Our main hypotheses were that if late learners can detect the L2 phonemic deviance and the resulting semantic violations, a PMN effect signaling phonological deviance detection and a subsequent N400 effect as a marker of the difficulty of semantic unification should be observed. At the lexical-semantic level of manipulation, a clear N400 effect related to semantic violation processing should be found. Regarding TFR, the detection of a phonological mismatch should be reflected by beta power modulations and the violation of lexical-semantic predictions by beta and low gamma power modulations.

Critically, we expected variations of the relevant neurophysiological effects to depend on L2 experience: increased effect sizes on the ERP and TFR level, as well as better behavioral performance to detect semantic violations were expected for more proficient L2 learners.

Methods

Participants

Twenty-nine right-handed (Edinburgh Handedness Inventory) young adult native speakers of French with intermediate proficiency in English participated in the ERP experiment. One participant was excluded due to technical failure of the stimulus presentation computer during the experiment, resulting in the data of 28 participants (19 female, 9 male; Age: 24.2 ± 3.1 years [18; 30]) being retained for the analysis. All participants were late learners of English who had studied the language at secondary school in France as a foreign language (L2): L2 1. By their own account, participants had no history of current or past neurological or psychiatric diseases, they had normal or correctedto-normal vision and normal color vision as well as no hearing deficiency. Before taking part in the study, the participants were individually informed about the experimental protocol as well as of the procedure of data storage and anonymization. They gave their informed written consent. The data collected were anonymized by applying the European Data FAIR principle [START_REF] Wilkinson | The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship[END_REF]. The study was approved by the local ethics committee of Paris Nanterre University -Department of Psychology and was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

-Insert Table 1 about here -

Stimuli and Procedure

A modified version of the semantic violation paradigm [START_REF] Kutas | Thirty Years and Counting: Finding Meaning in the N400 Component of the Event-Related Brain Potential (ERP)[END_REF][START_REF] Kutas | Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity[END_REF] was used in which the difference between semantically congruent and incongruent items was implemented by a phonemic contrast that was unique to the L2, English (e.g., /ɪ/ -/i:/, shipsheep). Three English phonemic contrasts that are not phonemic in French were identified: /r/-/w/ (e.g., rest -west), /ɪ/-/i:/ (e.g., ship -sheep) and /s/-/θ/ (e.g., mouse -mouth). Twenty minimal pairs per contrast were selected and subsequently embedded in a sentential context. Only minimal pairs with both items in the same grammatical class (nouns, verbs, or adjectives) were chosen. For each critical word, i.e., each member of a minimal pair, a congruent sentence context was created, that semantically constrained towards the critical word, constituting the 120 sentences of the phonological congruent condition (e.g., The anchor of the ship was let down). For the 120 sentences of the phonological incongruent condition, the critical word was swapped with the other member of the respective minimal pair (e.g., *The anchor of the sheep was let down). Table 2 displays examples of the different experimental conditions and in the Supplementary Material the complete list of sentences is provided. The underlying idea here was that the lexical-semantic incongruency could only be detected if the listener's perceptive system is sufficiently adapted to the phonological characteristics of English, her/his L2, to discriminate the phonologicallexical manipulation. To test for the lexical (un)predictability of the critical words in each sentence context and consequently to make sure that the congruency manipulation would be perceived as such, a cloze test was first conducted with native speakers of English who did not take part in the further ERP experiment. The cloze probability for each critical word in the respective congruent or incongruent sentence context was assessed in an online questionnaire, in which 14 native speakers of English were requested to complete each sentence fragment preceding the critical word with the first word that came to their mind. The cloze probability was significantly higher for the critical words being embedded in a congruent (cloze prob.

0.39 ± 0.34) than an incongruent (0.00 ± 0.02; p<.001) sentence context.

-Insert Table 2 about here -In a control condition, 120 congruent sentences (e.g., On my way home I stopped by the bakery to get some bread for dinner) and their incongruent counterparts consisting of a purely lexical-semantic violation were created. In the lexical-semantic incongruent condition, the critical word was replaced by a semantically incongruent word that did not have any phonological similarity (no shared onset phoneme or grapheme, no shared trigram sequence)

with the critical word (e.g., *On my way home I stopped by the bakery to get some gold for dinner), but was of the same grammatical class (see Table 2 for examples of the different experimental conditions and the Supplementary Material for the complete list of sentences).

The cloze probability in the lexical-semantic condition was significantly higher for the critical words embedded in a congruent (0.38 ± 0.34) than an incongruent (0.00 ± 0.00; p < .001) sentence context. Critical words in the phonological and lexical-semantic levels were matched for cloze probability (congruent critical words: 0.38 ± 0.34, incongruent critical words: 0.00 ± 0.01, p < .001; Linguistic level by Congruency interaction: F < 1), spoken frequency (logarithmic) (phonological level: 0.98 ± 0.86; lexical-semantic level: 0.87 ± 0.76; p > .10;

WEBCELEX [START_REF] Baayen | The CELEX lexical database [webcelex[END_REF], COBUILD (Collins Birmingham University International Language Database; [START_REF] Sinclair | Looking up: An account of the COBUILD project in lexical computing and the development of the Collins COBUILD English language dictionary[END_REF], and word length (number of letters) (phonological level:

4.20 ± 0.75; lexical-semantic level: 4.28 ± 0.80; F < 1). All sentences were recorded with natural prosody by a female native speaker of Southern British English in a sound-shielded room. The sound files where then post-processed in Praat 6.0.16 [START_REF] Boersma | Praat: a system for doing phonetics by computer[END_REF]: silence segments before sentence onset and after sentence offset were removed and the room. The latency of the critical word onset was identified by auditory analysis and by visual inspection of the spectrogram. Finally, two lists were created, consisting of 50% of the sentences that were from the phonological and 50% from the lexical-semantic level, and half of which were congruent and half incongruent sentences. These lists were presented in a counterbalanced fashion across participants so that each critical word and each sentence was presented only once to each participant and maximally three trials per condition were presented in immediate succession.

The participants listened to sentences that contained either a semantically congruent item (e.g., The anchor of the ship was let down) or an incongruent one (e.g., *The anchor of the sheep was let down) and were asked to perform an offline acceptability judgement after each stimulus sentence. Each trial started with a fixation cross presented in the center of the screen for 500 ms (see Figure 1), followed by the auditory presentation of a stimulus sentence, during which the fixation cross continued to be displayed on the screen. Then, solely the fixation cross was presented for 2000 ms, followed by a visual presentation of a question mark, thus prompting the participants to push a button (f/j on the keyboard) to indicate if they considered the sentence acceptable or not. The question mark was displayed until a response was given. Response buttons were counterbalanced across participants but were maintained constant within each participant. Then the fixation cross was displayed again for 2000 ms before the start of the next trial.

-Insert Figure 1 about here -

Behavioral data analysis

For the offline acceptability judgement, analyses on accuracy (percent correct responses) and discrimination capacity (d′) were carried out. For discrimination capacity analyses (d′), trials with both correct and incorrect responses were included. The d′ was calculated as d′ = z(Hit rate) -z(False alarm rate), i.e. the difference between the z-transforms of the proportion of incongruent trials to which the participant responded "unacceptable" (Hit rate) and the proportion of congruent trials to which subject responded "unacceptable" (False alarm rate).

Statistical analyses were carried out in R version 3.5.1 (R Core

EEG acquisition and preprocessing

EEG data were preprocessed in EEGLAB 13.6.5b [START_REF] Delorme | EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis[END_REF] and analyzed in FieldTrip (version 20190106) [START_REF] Oostenveld | FieldTrip: Open Source Software for Advanced Analysis of MEG, EEG, and Invasive Electrophysiological Data[END_REF] within MATLAB (version 9.0.0, R2016a). EEG was recorded from 64 channels that were placed according to the international 10-20 system (Fp1, Fz, F3, F7, FT9, FC5, FC1, C3, T7, TP9, CP5, CP1, Pz, P3, P7, O1, Oz, O2, P4, P8, TP10, CP6, CP2, Cz, C4, T8, FT10, FC6, FC2, F4, F8, Fp2, AF7, AF3, AFz, F1, F5, FT7, FC3, FCz, C1, C5, TP7, CP3, P1, P5, PO7, PO3, POz, PO4, PO8, P6, P2, CPz, CP4, TP8, C6, C2, FC4, FT8, F6, F2, AF4, AF8), mounted in an elastic cap (ActiCap, Brain decomposition (extended infomax algorithm; [START_REF] Lee | Independent component analysis using an extended infomax algorithm for mixed subgaussian and supergaussian sources[END_REF] was run, followed by an automatic identification and rejection of artifacted independent components using ADJUST [START_REF] Mognon | ADJUST: An automatic EEG artifact detector based on the joint use of spatial and temporal features: Automatic spatio-temporal EEG artifact detection[END_REF], specifically targeting artifacts caused by eye blinks, saccadic eye movements, and muscle activity. Then, by automatic artifact detection on the segmented data, epochs were rejected if amplitudes exceeded ±70 μV (pop_eegthresh, EEGLAB), if linear trends were detected below a maximum slope of 0.5 (pop_rejtrend, EEGLAB), if the joint probability of activity for single as well as all channels exceeded 5 standard deviations (pop_jointprob, EEGLAB), if there was an excessively peaky distribution of activity, that is if the kurtosis of activity for single as well as all channels exceeded 5 standard deviations (pop_rejkurt, EEGLAB), or if there were abnormal spectra in the in the 0-2 Hz frequency window (maximal deviation from baseline by ±50 dB) to remove residual noise from eye movement, or in the 20-40 Hz frequency window (maximal deviation from baseline by -100 to +25 dB) to remove residual muscle artifacts (pop_rejspec, EEGLAB). This was followed by the interpolation (spherical) of missing channels. This dataset was subsequently used for time-frequency analysis.

For the event-related brain potential (ERP) analysis, data were further low-pass filtered by 15 Hz (Hamming windowed sinc FIR filter), resegmented to -150 to 1000 ms relative to critical word onset and baseline corrected with the pre-onset time window. After artifact rejection, there were on average 28.5 ± 10.5 (SD) accepted trials per condition when including only trials with correct behavioral responses. On the number of trials remaining for neurophysiological analyses we conducted a two-way repeated measures ANOVA with Linguistic level (phonological vs. lexical-semantic) and Congruency (congruent vs.

incongruent) as within-subjects factors. There was a main effect of Linguistic level of analysis (F(1, 27) = 38.84, MSE = 23, p < .001, η 2 p = .590), reflecting that a larger number of trials was available for the neurophysiological analyses at the lexical-semantic (31.3 ± 9.4 (SD))

than at the phonological (25.6 ± 10.7 (SD)) level. Moreover, there was a main effect of Congruency (F(1, 27) = 27.57, MSE = 49, p < .001, η 2 p = .505), reflecting that a larger number of trials was kept in the congruent (31.9 ± 8.7 (SD)) than in the incongruent (25.0 ± 10.9 (SD)) modality. Finally, there was a Linguistic level of analysis by Congruency interaction (F(1, 27) = 43.09, MSE = 16, p < .001, η 2 p = .615), reflecting that the effect of Congruency on the number of kept trials was larger at the phonological (d = 11.9) than at the lexical-semantic (d = 1.9) level. These effects are a trade-off linked to the sensitivity of the design.

ERP analysis

In the current study, critical phonemes that determined the congruency of a word in a given context were not always in word-initial position. This amplifies an already inherent variability in latency of ERP components. During simple stimulus-locked averaging of trials, part of the relevant signal of a given ERP component might hence get washed out. Alternative approaches have been proposed that take this variability in latency into account, for instance residue iteration decomposition (RIDE; Ouyang et al., 2015aOuyang et al., , 2015b)). In the present study, RIDE was used to decompose the fully preprocessed and baselined single-trial event-related potential (ERP) data into stimulation-and component-related clusters. Beside the stimulusrelated time window spanning 0-50 ms after stimulus onset, two component clusters were included in the analysis. One component was set to an early time window, spanning 50-300 ms after stimulus onset to extract the PMN component, and a second component to a later time window spanning 300-700 ms after stimulus onset to extract the N400 component. After extraction, components were re-baselined with a baseline spanning 0-100 ms after stimulus onset. The selected time windows were based on previous studies [START_REF] Kutas | Thirty Years and Counting: Finding Meaning in the N400 Component of the Event-Related Brain Potential (ERP)[END_REF][START_REF] Newman | The Influence of Language Proficiency on Lexical Semantic Processing in Native and Late Learners of English[END_REF]Weber-Fox and Neville, 1996) but were enlarged to a wider time frame in order to account for temporal variability. On the grand average level, individualparticipant component clusters were again subjected to RIDE analysis in order to extract group-level components. In this approach, the component amplitudes are estimated by the covariance between the component template and single trials (or single participants), normalized by the variance of the template. These amplitude estimations were averaged over a subset of six frontal electrodes (Fz, F1, F2, FCz, FC1, FC2) in the case of the early PMN cluster and a subset of six centro-parietal electrodes (Cz, C1, C2, CPz, CP1, CP2) in the case of the later N400 cluster (see also, Figure 3). These amplitude values were then subjected to statistical analyses.

For the analysis of the amplitude of the PMN and the N400 component, a two-way repeated measures ANOVA with Linguistic level (phonological vs. lexical-semantic) and Congruency (congruent vs. incongruent) as within-subjects factors was conducted. Moreover, multiple regression analyses were conducted on Congruency effect sizes at the phonological and lexical-semantic, respectively, as the dependent variable in order to assess the relative influence of several language background measures on neurophysiological processes. Five Finally, a cluster-based permutation test using a dependent samples T-statistic was applied to test for an effect of Congruency (congruent vs. incongruent) on the ERP amplitude.

This test was carried out separately for each of the two Linguistic levels of analysis (phonological, lexical-semantic) in each of the two time-windows of interest (PMN: 50-300 ms; N400: 300-700 ms). The permutation test involved the Monte Carlo Method to calculate the significance probability, with 1000 draws from the permutation distribution. Cluster correction (maxsum criterion) was used to correct for multiple comparisons. A minimum number of one neighborhood channel needed to show significance in order for a selected sample to be included in the clustering algorithm. An alpha level of 0.05 was chosen for the sample-specific test statistic and an alpha level of 0.05 for the one-sided permutation test (to test only for the negativity effects according to the hypotheses formulated above). Given that one of our main interests lay in the influence of the linguistic background on L2 processing, separate analyses were also carried out for high and low proficient sub-groups of participants, determined by splitting at the median.

Time-frequency analysis

Statistical analyses on the fully preprocessed electrophysiological data were carried out in FieldTrip (version 20190106) [START_REF] Oostenveld | FieldTrip: Open Source Software for Advanced Analysis of MEG, EEG, and Invasive Electrophysiological Data[END_REF] in MATLAB (version 9.0.0, R2016a).

Time-frequency representations (TFR) were calculated on the single trials between 4 and 44 Hz, in frequency steps of 2 Hz and time steps of 20 ms by using Morlet wavelets with a width of 4 cycles. An alpha level of 0.05 was chosen for the sample-specific test statistic and an alpha level of 0.05 for a one-sided permutation test (corresponding to a threshold of p < .05 to detect effects) to detect power decreases in the incongruent compared to the congruent condition. All other aspects of the statistical analyses for TFR effects were identical to the analyses of ERPs. For plotting, TFRs were baseline-corrected by absolute baseline removal spanning the 500 ms preceding critical word onset.

Results

Behavioral data

Accuracy. Accuracy data are presented in Figure 2A. 2A).

-Insert Figure 2 about here -

Discrimination capacity (d′).

For the analysis of the discrimination capacity in detecting inacceptable semantic violations, a paired t-test with Linguistic level of analysis (phonological vs. lexical-semantic) as a within-subjects factor and d′ as the dependent variable revealed that the discrimination capacity (d′) was better at the lexical-semantic (1.50 ± 0.68) than the phonological level (0.74 ± 0.62; t(27) = 7.58, p < .001).

A multiple regression analysis was conducted to determine which among the five selected linguistic background variables (age of L2 acquisition (AoA L2), duration of L2 education, duration of immersion in an L2 environment, frequency of L2 use, L2 proficiency) best accounted for the variance of the error discrimination capacity (d′) at the phonological and lexical-semantic linguistic level in late learners of English. The regression analysis showed that the five predictors explained 46.5% of the variance of the lexical-semantic d′ (Adjusted R 2 = .465, F(5,22) = 5.688, p < .01, Cohen's f 2 = 0.87; see Table 3). The Cohen's f 2 of 0.87 indicates that this effect is indeed quite large. More specifically, two variables significantly predicted the lexical-semantic d′: L2 proficiency (β = .639, p < .01; see Figure 2B) and duration of L2 education (β = .321, p < .05) were positively related to the lexicalsemantic d′. In contrast, the model containing these five predictors did overall not significantly explain the variance of the phonological d′ (Adjusted R 2 = .143, F(5,22) = 1.902, p = .135).

-Insert Table 3 about here -

ERP data

Early time window: 50-300 ms

RIDE analysis. The two-way repeated measures ANOVA on amplitudes extracted for the early component cluster revealed a significant effect of Congruency reflecting a larger amplitude in the incongruent than the congruent condition over frontal electrodes (F(1, 27) = 6.42, MSE = .135, p < .05, η 2 p = .192; Figure 3A). No other main effect or interaction was observed (Fs < 1).

Multiple regression analysis. The multiple regression analysis indicated (tendency)

that the model of five language background predictors explained 19.0% of the variance of the 29 Congruency effect (PMN effect) at the phonological level (Adjusted R 2 = .190, F(5,22) = 2.26, p = .083, Cohen's f 2 = 0.23; see Table 4). The Cohen's f 2 of 0.23 indicates that this effect is of medium size. More specifically, one variable significantly predicted the effect size of the PMN: L2 proficiency (β = -.581, p < .05; see Figure 4) was inversely related to the phonological effect size, i.e. the higher a participant's proficiency, the smaller the amplitude difference between the incongruent and the congruent condition at the phonological level. In contrast, the model containing these five predictors did overall not significantly explain the variance of the lexical-semantic effect size on this early component (Adjusted R 2 = -.054, F(5,22) = 0.72, p = .612).

Cluster-based permutation test. Finally, the cluster-based permutation test revealed an effect of Congruency at the phonological level: the incongruent condition showed a larger negativity between 70 -160 ms over fronto-central, slightly left-lateralized electrodes (Figure 5A). This effect was driven by the highly proficient subgroup for which a significant effect was found between 55-150 ms (Figure 5B). No other effect was observed in this time window. This early component will in the following be referred to as N100.

-Insert Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5 and Table 4 about here -

Late time window: 300-700 ms

RIDE analysis. The two-way repeated measures ANOVA on amplitudes extracted for the later component cluster revealed a significant Congruency by Linguistic level interaction reflecting a larger Congruency effect at the lexical-semantic than the phonological level over central electrodes (F(1, 27) = 12.93, MSE = .007, p < .001, η 2 p = .324; Figure 3B). No main effect was observed in the ANOVA (ps > .10).

Multiple regression analysis.

The multiple regression analysis indicated that the model containing the five language background predictors did overall not significantly explain the variance of either the phonological (Adjusted R 2 = -.170, F(5,22) = 0.21, p = .953) or the lexical-semantic effect size (Adjusted R 2 = -.064, F(5,22) = 0.68, p = .647) on this later component.

Cluster-based permutation test. Finally, the cluster-based permutation test revealed that for the entire participant group an effect of Congruency (N400 effect) was present at the lexical-semantic level: the incongruent condition was more negative than the congruent one between 520-700 ms over central electrodes (Figure 5C). Moreover, in the highly proficient subgroup an effect of Congruency was present at the phonological level: the incongruent condition was more negative than the congruent one between 575-700 ms over centro-parietal electrodes (Figure 5D). No other effect was observed in this time window.

Time-frequency data

Early time window: 50-300 ms

No clusters of significant Congruency effects were found.

Late time window: 300-700 ms

A Congruency effect at the lexical-semantic level was found in the beta and lower gamma (20-44 Hz) range in a time window spanning 540-580 ms over central electrodes: beta and low gamma power was reduced in the incongruent compared to the congruent condition at the lexical-semantic level (Figure 6A andB). Moreover, a second effect was found for this contrast in the higher theta and alpha range (5-15 Hz) in the time window 300-440 ms over fronto-central electrodes: alpha power was reduced in the incongruent compared to the congruent condition at the lexical-semantic level (Figure 6A andC). No significant effects were found when testing highly and low proficient groups separately.

-Insert Figure 6 about here -

Discussion

In the present study, our main goal was to investigate (1) if the plasticity in the neurocognitive phonological system allows late L2 learners to reach L2 phoneme discrimination capacity, as assessed via neurophysiological language markers that reflect automatic sound deviance detection (phonological mismatch negativity; PMN) and phonology-mediated semantic unification (N400) and (2) which factors in the linguistic biography of L2 learners may best predict the L2 phonological processing capacity. For phonologically mediated semantic violations, we observed an N100, a PMN and an N400 effect, which were however modulated by L2 proficiency: whereas the N100 and the N400 effects were present especially in the highly proficient subgroup, the PMN effect size showed an inverse relation with L2

proficiency. For non-phonological lexical-semantic violations, a more negative deflection in the early time window and a characteristic N400 effect were found. Moreover, the N400 effect at the lexical-semantic level was paralleled by a reduction in alpha power and a slightly later reduction in beta and low gamma power in the incongruent compared to the congruent condition.

ERP and behavioral data

In the present study, we found behavioral and electroencephalographical evidence that proficiency in late learners of a second language (L2) predicts the capacity to discriminate phonemic contrasts that are specific to the L2. Importantly, the effect size of the phonological mismatch negativity (PMN) found for phonologically mediated semantic violations in a sentence context decreased with L2 proficiency. Moreover, only highly but not low proficient L2 learners showed both an auditory N100 and a characteristic N400 effect in response to phonologically mediated semantic violations in a sentence context. The N400 effect indicates that highly proficient participants processed the semantic violation and therefore that they were able to process the L2-specific phonemic contrast which underlay the semantic violation.

In association, the decreasing PMN size with increasing proficiency suggests more automatic, less effortful phonological mapping processes in favor of more profound lexical-semantic processing in the later time window. The higher automaticity of phonological processes seems to be corroborated by the perceptual auditory N100 which was driven by the highly proficient participants. The fact that the PMN pattern was reliably measured with residue iteration decomposition (RIDE; Ouyang et al., 2015aOuyang et al., , 2015b) ) but not with classical time-locked averaging might be due to the particular strength of RIDE to align components with variable timing across trials, which would be mitigated during classical time-locked averaging.

Whereas the N100 with very consistent timing and the N400 with a temporally extended waveform may suffer less from classical averaging, this might well have been the case for the PMN. This is especially the case in second language learners who habitually show more variability in their neurophysiological response to L2 stimuli [START_REF] Isel | Syntactic and referential processes in second-language learners: event-related brain potential evidence[END_REF][START_REF] Midgley | Language effects in second language learners and proficient bilinguals investigated with event-related potentials[END_REF][START_REF] Newman | The Influence of Language Proficiency on Lexical Semantic Processing in Native and Late Learners of English[END_REF]Weber-Fox and Neville, 1996).

The N100 is a negativity peaking around 100 ms (spanning approximately 70-130 ms; [START_REF] Dufour | To What Extent do we Hear Phonemic Contrasts in a Non-native Regional Variety? Tracking the Dynamics of Perceptual Processing with EEG[END_REF][START_REF] Sanders | Segmenting nonsense: an event-related potential index of perceived onsets in continuous speech[END_REF] after stimulus onset that is sensitive to physical and temporal characteristics (e.g., change of tonal frequency or intensity, word onset) of the stimulus and dependent on the individual's attentional or arousal state [START_REF] Näätänen | The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure[END_REF][START_REF] Obleser | Cortical representation of vowels reflects acoustic dissimilarity determined by formant frequencies[END_REF]. The neural generators of the N100 have been localized mainly in the auditory cortex, with additional contributions from the temporal and frontal cortex [START_REF] Näätänen | The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure[END_REF][START_REF] Näätänen | The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience[END_REF][START_REF] Obleser | Cortical representation of vowels reflects acoustic dissimilarity determined by formant frequencies[END_REF]. The N100 latency has been found to be more variable in word-embedded non-native phoneme discrimination [START_REF] Dufour | To What Extent do we Hear Phonemic Contrasts in a Non-native Regional Variety? Tracking the Dynamics of Perceptual Processing with EEG[END_REF]. In a training paradigm using nonwords, [START_REF] Sanders | Segmenting nonsense: an event-related potential index of perceived onsets in continuous speech[END_REF] demonstrated that the N100 amplitude is positively related to the capacity to segment continuous speech into words, independent of acoustic segmentation cues. Moreover, increased selective attention can cause a temporal sharpening of the N100 response [START_REF] Thornton | Selective attention increases the temporal precision of the auditory N100 event-related potential[END_REF]. In a similar vein, [START_REF] Obleser | Multiple brain signatures of integration in the comprehension of degraded speech[END_REF] found an association between N100 amplitudes and comprehension performance in degraded speech, which was suggested to reflect a "bottom-up" processing strategy involving effortful resource allocation. In the present study, the larger auditory N100 in response to the phonemic violation specifically in highly proficient participants may reflect a more native-like, higher temporal precision in L2 auditory processing. Better speech segmentation, as reported by [START_REF] Sanders | Segmenting nonsense: an event-related potential index of perceived onsets in continuous speech[END_REF], may be a core ingredient but the specificity to the phonological violation condition suggests that additional processes are at stake, notably a top-down influence on auditory perception based on linguistic prediction. In the present study, the highly proficient participants may have been able to seize the importance of the phonological information and hence to additionally address more attention to this level of information.

Evidence for new phonemic categories but weaker category boundaries

Previous studies have demonstrated that the sensitivity to non-native phonemic contrasts can increase in late learners of a second language, e.g. with targeted training, but the increase in sensitivity may not reflect the acquisition of a novel phonemic category because the newly acquired phoneme can be integrated in an already existing phonemic category [START_REF] Dobel | Non-native phonemes in adult word learning: evidence from the N400m[END_REF]. However, the present findings suggest that highly proficient L2 learners perceived the violation induced by a phonemic contrast not as an allophonic variant within a phonemic category but rather as a categorical difference, given that the different lexical-semantic status of the critical word could be identified. Our data corroborate the ideas put forward in the SLM [START_REF] Flege | Interactions between the native and second-language phonetic systems[END_REF][START_REF] Flege | Second-language speech learning: Findings, and problems[END_REF]) that the phonological system of late L2 learners still allows for novel phonemic categories to be constructed. However, it remains open whether a novel phonemic category has been created for only one or for both non-native phonemes. Further research should try to identify the role of the relative phonetic proximity of the two non-native phonemes to a native phonemic category (see also, [START_REF] Best | Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities[END_REF][START_REF] Tyler | Phonetic and Phonological Influences on the Discrimination of Non-native Phones[END_REF] leading to either (1) an assimilation of one of the two L2 phonemes, i.e., the phonetically closer one, to the closest L1 phoneme and the creation of a new category for only the phonetically more distant phoneme, or (2) the creation of new phonemic categories for both non-native phonemes.

Interestingly, the L2 speakers showed good behavioral performance in accepting correct sentences (i.e., no phonologically mediated semantic violation) but their performance was weaker in rejecting unacceptable sentences. These findings may indicate a gradual progression in the creation of non-native phonemic categories. That is, whereas the contrast between the L2 phoneme prototypes seems to be established already at low to intermediate L2 proficiency, the sharpening of the fine-grained categorization boundary which is relevant for categorizing more variable realizations of the phoneme (e.g., word-embedded realizations of the phoneme) may need more time and experience during L2 acquisition. The high proportion of accurate responses in the correct condition and the weaker performance in the violation condition supports this interpretation, potentially reflecting a good handling when a concrete phonemic realization closely matches the expected prototype but greater difficulty to reject less prototypical realizations. Hence, the difficulty might lie rather in the sharpness and delimitation of the phonemic category boundaries than in the capacity to establish a new phonemic category. This weaker boundary delimitation may also underlie previously observed priming effects across phonemic categories even in highly proficient L2 speakers, but not in native speakers [START_REF] Broersma | Competition dynamics of second-language listening[END_REF]. Future research should investigate the sharpening of category boundaries with increasing L2 proficiency and experience, as well as changes in the underlying neural processing dynamics.

Time-frequency data

Power modulations in the beta-gamma (22-44 Hz) and theta-alpha (5-15 Hz) range in response to purely lexical-semantic violations were observed, independent of proficiency.

Beta band oscillations (14-30 Hz) have previously been associated with the active synchronization and maintenance of the current neurocognitive state to represent sentencelevel meaning under construction and the propagation of prediction to lower levels of processing [START_REF] Arnal | Cortical oscillations and sensory predictions[END_REF][START_REF] Lewis | A predictive coding framework for rapid neural dynamics during sentence-level language comprehension[END_REF]. Moreover, meaningprocessing at the sentence level has been associated with oscillatory activity in the gamma range (30-45 Hz), in that low and middle gamma was suggested to reflect the matching of topdown predictions with bottom-up linguistic input [START_REF] Lewis | A predictive coding framework for rapid neural dynamics during sentence-level language comprehension[END_REF]. The present finding of a power decrease in the beta and lower gamma range for semantically incongruent compared to congruent words (with respect to the predictions based on the preceding sentence context) is in accordance with previous findings and corroborates the idea that beta oscillations play a role during the construction of sentence meaning. The beta power decrease for semantic violations may hence reflect a disruption and reconfiguration of this process.

Similarly, the idea that lower gamma oscillations play a role in the matching between semantic predictions and the bottom-up input is corroborated by the current data, with gamma power decreases indicating a mismatch between predictions and input. Finally, the power decrease observed in the theta-alpha range (5-15 Hz) for semantically unexpected compared to congruent words is also consistent with previous findings [START_REF] Kielar | Oscillatory Responses to Semantic and Syntactic Violations[END_REF] and may reflect semantic unification involving additional domain general, top-down cognitive control processes (see also, [START_REF] Klimesch | Alpha-band oscillations, attention, and controlled access to stored information[END_REF][START_REF] Lam | Neural activity during sentence processing as reflected in theta, alpha, beta, and gamma oscillations[END_REF][START_REF] Rihs | Mechanisms of selective inhibition in visual spatial attention are indexed by α-band EEG synchronization[END_REF][START_REF] Terporten | The Relation between Alpha/Beta Oscillations and the Encoding of Sentence induced Contextual Information[END_REF]. Overall, in late L2 learners, the capacity to identify lexical-semantic violations in a sentence context is reflected by characteristic, native-like oscillatory patterns that are associated with sentence-level semantic unification processes, under inclusion of additional attentional and control processes.

With respect to phonological mismatch processing, previous studies have also associated power modulations in the beta frequency band with the top-down transmission of predictions at the phonological level [START_REF] Arnal | Cortical oscillations and sensory predictions[END_REF], with beta power increases being associated with stronger phonological predictions [START_REF] Scharinger | Linguistic category structure influences early auditory processing: Converging evidence from mismatch responses and cortical oscillations[END_REF]. In the present study, no beta power modulations for phonemic violations were found in either the highly or low proficient group. Although our expectations were based on previous findings in the native language processing literature, similar dynamics were expected for non-native speech processing at least in highly proficient participants. Research comparing oscillatory dynamics in native and non-native speech is relatively recent but there is evidence that in nonnative speech processing, oscillatory dynamics are more variable than in native speech processing [START_REF] Drijvers | Native and non-native listeners show similar yet distinct oscillatory dynamics when using gestures to access speech in noise[END_REF][START_REF] Jin | Oscillation Encoding of Individual Differences in Speech Perception[END_REF][START_REF] Lewis | Gender agreement violations modulate beta oscillatory dynamics during sentence comprehension: A comparison of second language learners and native speakers[END_REF][START_REF] Pérez | Differential oscillatory encoding of foreign speech[END_REF]. This may be due to a less automatized and slower integration of semantic and phonological information as well as a higher cognitive load [START_REF] Pérez | Differential oscillatory encoding of foreign speech[END_REF], the need for additional attentional focus [START_REF] Lewis | Gender agreement violations modulate beta oscillatory dynamics during sentence comprehension: A comparison of second language learners and native speakers[END_REF], or the involvement of different processing strategies [START_REF] Drijvers | Native and non-native listeners show similar yet distinct oscillatory dynamics when using gestures to access speech in noise[END_REF] in non-native compared to native speech and information processing.

Here, the cognitive load linked to a reduced automaticity in integrating phonological and lexical-semantic information in the L2 might have attenuated the oscillatory signal for this manipulation, even in the highly proficient group. In an alternative study design, providing instructions or an attentional cue that would allow to focus specifically on the critical part of speech could potentially have a facilitatory role and allow for more profound phonological and semantic processing in the phonologically mediated lexical-semantic manipulation. However, paralleling the robust ERP N400 effect at the lexical-semantic level, a TFR effect was found, indicating that native-like oscillatory markers can emerge for L2

processing. Further research, potentially involving a longitudinal study design, should shed further light on the quantitative and qualitative changes of TFR signatures during L2 acquisition and investigate how these changes parallel the evolution of ERP signatures.

The role of individual differences in the language biography

Concerning the language background measures (age of L2 acquisition (AoA L2), duration of L2 education, duration of immersion in an L2 environment, frequency of L2 use, L2 proficiency), some factors were more reliable predictors for perceptual sensitivity on the behavioral level than others. That is, especially L2 proficiency -and to a minor degree the duration of L2 education -seems to be a strong predictor for the accuracy of L2 comprehension, as assessed here via the accuracy to discriminate phonological and lexicalsemantic violations. Interestingly, it has previously been found that with intense training to discriminate L2 phonemic contrasts, sensory and perceptual plasticity emerge at different timescales. For example, whereas perceptual identification for Mandarin lexical tones was already found earlier during learning, evidence for sensory encoding in the form of neural tracking of the F0 tone contour (frequency-following response; FFR) was only found at a very advanced level of behavioral L2 phonemic discrimination performance [START_REF] Reetzke | Tracing the Trajectory of Sensory Plasticity across Different Stages of Speech Learning in Adulthood[END_REF].

In the same vein, it was found that individuals with better performance in L2 phonological perception showed reduced inter-trial FFR variability [START_REF] Omote | Successful non-native speech perception is linked to frequency following response phase consistency[END_REF]. In the present study, higher L2 proficiency was found to be associated with better behavioral discrimination scores and, on the neurophysiological level, with a larger auditory N100 effect (probably reflecting more fine-tuned timing of the neural response), a smaller PMN effect and a larger effect on the subsequent semantic N400. These findings suggest profound neural changes during second language learning not only in the substrate underlying sensory, phonological or semantic levels but importantly also in the connection between these levels of processing in the language network.

Which are the parameters that enable an L2 learner to reach high proficiency on the different levels of linguistic processing and more specifically on the phonological level? At the phonological level, it has been argued that implicit learning may not be sufficient to establish L2 phonemic discrimination capacity [START_REF] Dobel | Non-native phonemes in adult word learning: evidence from the N400m[END_REF]. In contrast, there is evidence that intense phonological production training (guided learning) may lead to increased performance in both L2 production and comprehension on the phonemic level [START_REF] Iverson | Auditory training for experienced and inexperienced second-language learners: Native French speakers learning English vowels[END_REF][START_REF] Macedonia | Pronunciation in Foreign Language: How to Train[END_REF], up to the prosodic level [START_REF] Guyot-Talbot | Entraînements à la prosodie des questions ouvertes et fermées de l'anglais chez des apprenants francophones[END_REF] see also, motor theory of speech; [START_REF] Galantucci | The motor theory of speech perception reviewed[END_REF][START_REF] Liberman | Perception of the speech code[END_REF]. Furthermore, it has been argued that late L2 learning, and especially phonological learning, more strongly relies on top-down processes, involving attention, relative to bottom-up statistical and implicit learning [START_REF] White | Learning, neural plasticity and sensitive periods: implications for language acquisition, music training and transfer across the lifespan[END_REF]. However, the phonological learning success appears to also strongly depend on the type of phonemic contrast involved [START_REF] Best | Examination of perceptual reorganization for nonnative speech contrasts: Zulu click discrimination by English-speaking adults and infants[END_REF][START_REF] Dobel | Non-native phonemes in adult word learning: evidence from the N400m[END_REF][START_REF] Dupoux | Persistent stress 'deafness': The case of French learners of Spanish[END_REF][START_REF] Golestani | Individual differences in the acquisition of second language phonology[END_REF]. In general, it seems to be beneficial to direct an attentional focus on particularly difficult elements of the new language to acquire, be it a syntactic construction or a phonemic contrast that is specific to the L2 and not yet known to the learner from the L1 (e.g., [START_REF] Dobel | Non-native phonemes in adult word learning: evidence from the N400m[END_REF]. Thus, it may be helpful to work towards learning and teaching methods that explicitly involve L2 production as well as explicit focalization on the phonological features to be acquired in order to improve phonological processing during SLA.

Finally, the capacity to acquire non-native phonology has previously been shown to also be of considerable inter-individual variability related to certain neuroanatomical features [START_REF] Golestani | Brain Structure Predicts the Learning of Foreign Speech Sounds[END_REF][START_REF] Golestani | Individual differences in the acquisition of second language phonology[END_REF][START_REF] Omote | Successful non-native speech perception is linked to frequency following response phase consistency[END_REF][START_REF] Pruitt | Training the perception of Hindi dental and retroflex stops by native speakers of American English and Japanese[END_REF].

Thus, future research should try to identify the facilitating and limiting factors for neuroplastic changes in the phonological system that reside in neurocognitive individual differences as well as in environmental factors such as the language biography and the conditions of second language acquisition.

Conclusion

The present findings corroborate the idea that neuronal plasticity in the human brain allows for second language acquisition beyond native language attunement early in life. This seems to be the case even for seemingly hard-wired linguistic features such as the discrimination of phonemic contrasts. In the current study, we were particularly interested in the interaction between phonological and semantic levels of processing. To our knowledge, this is the first time that behavioral and neurophysiological evidence for the neural plasticity underlying these linguistic processes and especially for their strong interdependence has been provided.

However, further research is necessary to identify the facilitating and limiting factors for neuroplastic changes in the phonological system that reside in neurocognitive individual differences as well as in environmental factors such as the language biography and the conditions of second language acquisition. Finally, our data strongly support the idea that pieces of information from different levels of linguistic processing (e.g., phonological, semantic) heavily interact and influence each other during online language processing.

Table 2. Examples of the stimuli in the four experimental conditions. The critical word in each sentence is highlighted in bold font. The asterisk indicates the incongruent variant of the critical word. Examples at the phonological level are given in the following order for the three phonemic contrasts: /r/-/w/, /ɪ/-/i:/, /s/-/θ/.

Linguistic level

Phonological

Lexical-semantic

The bird hurt its wing/*ring and so it couldn't fly away.

To get a better view of the landscape he walked up the hill/*heel behind the house.

His lips are swollen because someone punched him in the face/*faith yesterday.

He didn't have any cash, so he asked the waiter if payment by card/*neck was possible.

I got soaked in the rain, so I asked him for a towel to dry/*skip my hair.

It was so dark in the cave that I had to carry a lamp/*cup in front of my head.

  lexical-semantic) and Congruency (congruent vs. incongruent) as within-subjects factors was conducted. For the analysis of the d′, a paired t-test with Linguistic level (phonological vs. lexical-semantic) as the within-subjects factor was conducted. Moreover, two multiple regression analyses were conducted on d′ as the dependent variable in order to assess the relative influence of several language background measures on the phonological and lexicalsemantic error detection capacity in the L2. Five between-subjects factors were included to analyze their respective part of variance on the d′ in the phonological and the lexical-semantic linguistic levels: age of L2 acquisition (L2 AoA), duration of L2 education, duration of immersion in an L2 environment, frequency of L2 use, and L2 proficiency. A significance level of .05 was used for all statistical tests.

  Products), with the vertex electrode (Cz) placed at 50% of the distance between inion and nasion and the left and right ear, and recorded with Pycorder, Brain Products. All channels were referenced online against an implicit reference generated by the BrainAmp (Brain Products) amplifier. Electrode impedances were kept below 25 kΩ. Data were recorded at a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. An online band-pass filter of 0.01-100 Hz was used. During preprocessing, the data were first filtered offline with a bandpass filter from 0.05 to 45 Hz (Hamming windowed sinc FIR filter) and the continuous data were then cleaned for bursts (using Artifact Subspace Reconstruction -ASR), slow drifts, and strongly movement contaminated time windows, and bad channels were removed (clean_rawdata version 0.31, plugin implemented for EEGLAB) [Maximum tolerated flatline duration: 5 s; Transition band for high-pass filter: [0.25 0.75] Hz; Minimum channel correlation: 0.85; Line Noise Criterion: 4; Standard deviation cutoff for removal of bursts (via ASR): 20; Criterion for removing time windows that were not repaired completely: 0.25]. Next, the continuous data were rereferenced to average reference and then segmented into epochs spanning -1000 ms to +2000 ms relative to critical word onset. Next, an independent component analysis (ICA)

  explanatory variables were included to analyze their respective part of variance on the effect size in the phonological and the lexical-semantic linguistic levels: age of L2 acquisition (L2 AoA), duration of L2 education, duration of immersion in an L2 environment, frequency of L2 use, and L2 proficiency. A significance level of .05 was used for all statistical tests. Statistical analyses were carried out with R version 3.5.1 (R Core Team, 2013): paired t-tests were run with function t.test() (package stats v3.5.1); repeated measures ANOVAs were carried out with function aov() (package stats v3.5.1), effect sizes were calculated with function EtaSq() (package DescTools v0.99.26), post-hoc tests with functions lmer() (package lme4 v1.1.19) and emmeans() (package emmeans v1.2.3); multiple regression analyses were carried out with function lm() (package stats v3.5.1) and standardized coefficients β were calculated with function lm_beta() (package QuantPsyc v1.5).

FiguresFigure 1 .

 1 Figure 1. Timing of a trial.

Figure 2 .

 2 Figure 2. Behavioral results. A Accuracy of the acceptability judgment in each condition. B Discrimination capacity as calculated via the discrimination capacity measure d′ at both linguistic levels (phonological, lexical-semantic). ˙ .10 > p > .05, * p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .001.

Figure 4 .

 4 Figure 4. PMN effect size as a function of L2 proficiency. PMN amplitude effect size at the phonological linguistic level is plotted as a function of L2 proficiency. Amplitude was calculated based on covariance with the component template (cf. RIDE; Ouyang et al., 2015a, 2015b).

Figure 6 .

 6 Figure 6. Time-frequency representation results at the lexical-semantic level. Congruency effects (difference plots, incongruent (violation) minus congruent (no violation)) are presented for the lexical-semantic level. A Congruency effects at the lexical-semantic level for the whole group of participants in the late time window (300-700 ms). B Representative topographical plot for the effect in the beta and gamma band, at 26 Hz and 560 ms after critical word onset. C Representative topographical plot for the effect in the theta and alpha band, at 10 Hz and 360 ms after critical word onset. Electrodes where effects were observed are marked with a dot.

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful to Hannah King for her support in stimulus creation, Irena Ilic and Mahsa Bahrami for data collection, to Maud Pélissier for the management of the EEG equipment and testing facilities and to the Labex "Empirical Foundations of Linguistics" (EFL) [ANR-10-LABX-0083] for the provision of the EEG recording system. This work was supported by the project "SOPHOCLE" -IDEX Sorbonne Paris Cité University and by the ANR program -"Investissements d'Avenir" [ANR-10-LABX-0083].

6.