author: JUSTICE TODD

text:
    146 A.3d 232
    SCUNGIO BORST & ASSOCIATES, Appellant v. 410 SHURS LANE DEVELOPERS, LLC and Kenworth II, LLC and Robert DeBolt, Appellees
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    ARGUED: May 11, 2016
    DECIDED: September 28, 2016

      Paul Patrick Padien, Esq., Law Offices of Paul P. Padien, PC, for Appellant.
    Evan Barenbaum, Esq., Stern & Eisenberg, PC, for Appel-lee.
    SAYLOR, C.J., BAER, TODD, DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, JJ.
   OPINION

JUSTICE TODD

In this appeal, we consider whether a contractor may maintain an action under the Contractor and Subcontractor Payment Act (“CASPA”) against a property owner’s agents. After careful review, we hold that a contractor may not do so, and, accordingly, we affirm the order of the Superior Court.

By way of statutory background, CASPA generally provides that a contractor or subcontractor who improves real property pursuant to a contract is entitled to timely payment pursuant to governing contract terms, or, in the absence of such terms, according to a statutorily-specified timetable, on pain of liability in the form of interest payments, and, if litigation is commenced, penalties and reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses. Relevant to the issue herein — ie., whom a contractor or subcontractor is entitled to recover from — Section 4 of CASPA provides that a contractor or subcontractor is entitled “to payment from the party with whom the contractor or subcontractor has contracted.” 73 P.S. § 504. Sections 5 through 12 of CASPA, however, do not use this “contracting party” language and instead describe the relative obligations and rights of “owners,” “contractors,” and “subcontractors.” See 73 P.S. § 505-512. Most centrally, Section 5, entitled “Owner’s payment obligations,” provides that “[t]he owner shall pay the contractor strictly in accordance with terms of the construction contract,” creates a default term for timely payment in the absence of an express term governing the same, and subjects “owners” who do not timely pay contractors to interest payments at a statutorily-provided rate. 73 P.S. § 505. Likewise, Section 12 provides that “owners” who fail to comply with CASPA’s requirements are subject to “a penalty equal to 1% per month of the amount that was wrongfully withheld,” as well as reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses. 73 P.S. § 512.

Finally, of particular importance herein, Section 2 of CAS-PA defines “owner,” “unless the context clearly indicates otherwise,” as

[a] person who has an interest in the real property that is improved and who ordered the improvement to be made. The term includes successors in interest of the owner and agents of the owner acting with their authority.

73 P.S. § 502.

Against this legal backdrop, the factual and procedural history of this matter is relatively straightforward. Beginning in 2005, Appellant Scungio Borst & Associates (“SBA”) entered into a series of written and oral construction contracts with Appellee 410 Shurs Lane Developers, LLC (“410 SLD”), which 410 SLD’s part-owner and president, Appellee Robert DeBolt (“DeBolt”), executed on 410 SLD’s behalf. Therein, SBA agreed to improve real property owned by 410 SLD in connection with the development of a condominium complex, and did so until November 2006, when SBA’s contracts were terminated with approximately $1.5 million in outstanding payments due. SBA requested payment, but 410 SLD, again through DeBolt, refused.

Accordingly, SBA filed the instant action against 410 SLD; its alleged successor corporation, Appellee Kenworth II, LLC (“Kenworth”); and DeBolt in his personal capacity. SBA asserted, among other claims, violations of CASPA. Central to this appeal, DeBolt filed a motion for summary judgment with respect to SBA’s claim under CASPA, arguing he could not be held liable under CASPA because he was not a party to SBA’s contract with 410 SLD, and citing Section 4 for the proposition that CASPA applies solely to parties to a construction contract. SBA responded that DeBolt was liable under Sections 2 and 5 because he was an agent of 410 SLD who acted with his authority in ordering the subject work. (The parties do not dispute that DeBolt acted as 410 SLD’s agent in this respect.) SBA further claimed that Section 2 was analogous to Section 260.2a of the Wage Payment Collection Law (“WPCL”)— which defines an employer subject to liability thereunder as including an employer’s “agents” or “officers” and which some courts have interpreted as permitting action against such agents or officers in their personal capacities — and, thus, should be similarly interpreted as permitting actions against property owners’ agents in their personal capacities. The trial court disagreed:

[410 SLD] was the “owner” of the property and ... DeBolt was not. CASPA imposes payment obligations upon the owner of real property, and a contractor may sue the owner if such payments are not made. ... Although the owner’s “agents” are included in this definition, the legislature cannot have intended to make every “agent,” including even the lowliest employee, liable for a corporate property owner’s debts to its contractors. Instead, the legislature must have intended to hold the principal, i.e., the owner, liable for its agents’ authorized acts in “ordering the improvement to be made.” Such an interpretation comports with general agency law.

Trial Court Opinion, 12/14/2012, at 3 (citations omitted). Accordingly, the trial court granted DeBolt’s motion for summary judgment.

SBA ultimately obtained a default judgment in the amount of $1.9 million against 410 SLD and Kenworth. SBA then appealed the trial court’s order granting DeBolt’s motion for summary judgment to the Superior Court.

In a scholarly and comprehensive published opinion authored by Judge Mary Jane Bowes, an en banc panel of the Superior Court affirmed. Scungio Borst & Assocs. v. 410 Shurs Lane Developers, LLC, 106 A.3d 103 (Pa.Super.2014) (en banc). The court first rejected SBA’s primary argument that Section 2’s definition of “owner” clearly and unambiguously permitted it to recover from DeBolt. Preliminarily, the court noted that Section 2 contains a caveat that its definitions apply “unless the context clearly indicates otherwise,” id. at 106 (quoting Section 2), and added that, pursuant to its own precedent, CASPA applies only in the context of a construction contract, id. (citing, inter alia, Prieto Corp. v. Gambone Constr. Co., 100 A.3d 602 (Pa.Super.2014)). The court then found tension between Section 4’s language that a contractor is entitled to payment from “the party with whom the contractor ... has contracted” and the ensuing sections’ description of a contractor’s right to payment from an “owner,” finding that such tension rendered the statute’s language ambiguous as to whether a contractor could recover from an owner’s agent, in a personal capacity. Accordingly, the court held that Section 2 did not clearly and unambiguously permit SBA’s claim against DeBolt in his personal capacity.

Turning to SBA’s contention that Section 2 was an analogue to Section 260.2a of the WPCL, the court noted that SBA cited no legislative history or authority suggesting that Section 2 was modeled after Section 260.2a, and remarked that the provisions’ language was materially different. The court further noted that, while the WPCL was intended to provide employees a mechanism to disgorge wrongfully withheld wages from their employers, and while imposing personal liability for employers’ agents gave “top corporate managers an incentive to use available corporate funds for the payment of wages and benefits rather than for some other purpose,” id at 108 (citing Carpenters Health and Welfare Fund of Phila. and Vicinity by Gray v. Ambrose, Inc., 727 F.2d 279, 282-83 (3d Cir.1983)), CASPA was intended “to protect contractors and subcontractors [and] to encourage fair dealing among parties to a construction contract,” id at 109 (quoting Ruthrauff, Inc. v. Ravin, 914 A.2d 880, 890 (Pa.Super.2006)) (emphasis in Scungio Borst & Assocs). Bearing that distinction in mind, and reiterating CASPA’s dependence upon the existence of a construction contract, the court concluded:

[T]he construction contract is the starting point of any CASPA analysis. CASPA does not supplant the traditional breach of contract action between contracting parties; it merely makes additional remedies available to contractors and subcontractors when they are not promptly paid by the party with which they contracted.

Id. at 109.

Finally, the court rejected SBA’s interpretation of Section 2 as imposing liability on owners’ agents on the basis that it would run contrary to the longstanding principles that non-parties to a contract may not be held liable thereunder and that an agent of a disclosed principal is not personally liable for contracts entered into in the scope of his agency on the principal’s behalf. The court reasoned that, if the General Assembly had sought to abrogate such bedrock principles of contract and agency law, it would have done so more expressly. Id. (citing In re Estate of Duran, 692 A.2d 176, 179 (Pa.Super.1997); Buradus v. General Cement Prods. Co., 159 Pa.Super. 501, 48 A.2d 883, 886 (1946), affd per curiam, 356 Pa. 349, 52 A.2d 205 (1947)).

Given the foregoing, the court concluded that Section 2⅛ definition of owner did not impose personal-liability on property owners’ agents; instead, the court reasoned:

The reference to authorized agents in the definition of owner merely reinforces that their conduct is imputed to and binding upon the owner. Since the term “agent” is not defined in the statute, conceivably that term could include architects, project managers, and designated representatives who are acting on behalf of the owner in dealing with the contractor. “Contractor” is defined as “[a] person authorized or engaged by an owner to improve real property.” 73 P.S. § 502. That definition is arguably broad enough to encompass agents of the owner. ... The “agent of owner” language was intended to clarify that persons acting on behalf of and with the authority of the owner are not contractors within the meaning of the statute for purposes of the time limitations contained therein. Furthermore, they are not entitled to avail themselves of the additional remedies afforded under CASPA in the event of a dispute with their principals.

Id. at 109-10. In the court’s view, this construction of Section 2 is consistent with Section 4, with well settled principles of the common law of contracts and agency, and still served CASPA’s purpose of protecting contractors because parties could “pierce the corporate veil” to hold shareholders liable. Id. at 110. (DeBolt was a shareholder of 410 SLD.)

President Judge Emeritus John Bender, joined by then-Judges, now-Justices, Sallie Updyke Mundy and David Wecht, dissented, agreeing with SBA’s position that Section 2 of CASPA was analogous to Section 260.2a of the WPCL, and should be interpreted as providing for agent liability where agents are involved in decisions giving rise to liability.

Thereafter, on SBA’s petition, we granted allowance of appeal to consider whether a contractor may maintain an action under CASPA against a property owner’s agents. Scungio Borst & Assocs. v. 410 Shurs Lane Developers, LLC, 120 A.3d 298 (Pa.2015) (order).

Before us, SBA renews its argument that the plain meaning of the foregoing provisions permits it to maintain its action against DeBolt in his personal capacity. As it did below, SBA explains that CASPA provides for an “owner’s” liability, and that, as detailed above, Section 2 defines an owner as including “agents of the owner acting with their authority.” Thus, SBA reasons, because of 410 SLD’s breach of contract, DeBolt, an “ ‘agent of the owner acting with [his] authority,’ ” is individually liable to SBA under CASPA. Appellant’s Brief at 13-14 (quoting 73 P.S. § 502).

In the alternative, assuming arguendo that CASPA is ambiguous, SBA reasserts its view, rejected by the Superior Court, that Section 2’s language defining an “owner” as including “agents of the owner acting with their authority” is analogous to Section 260.2a of the WPCL’s definition of “employers” as including an employer’s “agent[s] or officer[s],” and, thus, that this Court should interpret Section 2, as other courts have interpreted Section 260.2a, as imposing personal liability on agents with decision-making authority. Specifically, SBA posits that “the intent of both acts is to protect workmen” by ensuring that they get paid for work performed, that both statutes define liable entities as including their agents, and, thus, they should be interpreted as similarly imposing liability on agents who are decision-makers. Appellant’s Brief at 13-16. SBA contends this limitation on agency liability deflates the trial court’s concern that its interpretation could render all of a firm’s employees liable for its debts.

Further, SBA disputes the Superior Court’s conclusion that SBA cited no authority or legislative history in support of its analogy between CASPA and the WPCL, and contends that the court’s view that the statutes use materially different terms is equivalent to a “claim ... that the use of ‘agent’ in both acts is an accident,” but “[c]ommon sense dictates otherwise [and the] use of the same term in both acts is a facial similarity, not a facial difference.” Appellant’s Brief at 19 n.2. SBA further submits that the Superior Court’s analysis ignores the presumption that the legislature is familiar with extant law when enacting legislation and that it may use statutory language already interpreted in a particular way to indicate its intent to obtain a similar interpretation of a new statute. SBA notes that the judicial decisions interpreting the foregoing language of the WPCL predate the General Assembly’s enactment of CASPA, and, thus, reasons that the presumption applies herein. Thus, SBA contends the Superior Court’s determination that CASPA merely provides additional remedies to contracting parties is erroneous, and that the statute, like the WPCL, actually incentivizes agents to remedy owners’ violations in order to protect contractors.

Finally, SBA challenges the Superior Court’s view that Section 2’s reference to agents merely clarifies that agents’ conduct is imputed to owners and explains that agents are not contractors within the meaning of its terms. SBA contends that view is inconsistent with CASPA’s definition of an “owner” subject to liability under, inter alia, Sections 505 and 512. SBA adds that, insofar as “owners” subject to liability are intended to include “agents of the owner acting with their authority,” “it follows that ‘agents of owners’ are subject to liability under CASPA,” and “[t]he majority’s interpretation of ‘agent of the owner’ as a mere device for distinguishing agents from contractors is unsound.” Appellant’s Brief at 20-21.

DeBolt, by contrast, argues that a party may recover under CASPA only from a party with whom it contracted. He submits that the language of Section 4 suggests as much, and that it would be absurd to interpret the remaining provisions of CASPA as breaking from longstanding, basic contract and agency law principles to impose liability on an agent for his principal’s obligations, essentially rendering agents as personal guarantors of their principals’ construction contracts. De-Bolt thus agrees with the Superior Court’s conclusion that Section 2’s language was merely intended to establish that an agent’s conduct is imputed to an owner, and that an agent is not himself a contractor. He claims that SBA’s reliance on the WPCL is flawed, reasoning that “the statutes are incongruous, and there is no authority or legislative history to conclude that CASPA and the WPCL were intended to be parallel provisions, or that the terms should be similarly construed.” Appel-lee’s Brief at 9. DeBolt asserts that the legislature enacted the WPCL to cure the unequal bargaining power between employers and employees, whereas there is no similar inequality among property developers and their contractors.

Because the issue of whether a contractor may bring a CASPA action against a property owner’s agent is one of statutory construction — a pure question of law — our standard of review is de novo and our scope of review is plenary. Freedom Medical Supply, Inc. v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co., 131 A.3d 977, 980 (Pa.2016). In interpreting a statute, this Court endeavors to “ascertain and effectuate the intention of the General Assembly.” 1 Pa.C.S. § 1921(a). Because, “generally, the best indicator of legislative intent is the plain language of the statute,” we begin our inquiry by considering the words of the statute. Com., Ofc. of the Gov. v. Donahue, 626 Pa. 437, 98 A.3d 1223, 1237 (2014); 1 Pa.C.S. § 1921(b) (“When the words of a statute are clear and free from all ambiguity, the letter of it is not to be disregarded under the pretext of pursuing its spirit”). In doing so, we construe words and phrases according to their “common and approved” usage or, as appropriate, their “ ‘peculiar and appropriate’ or statutorily provided meanings.” Freedom Medical Supply, 131 A.3d at 983 (citing 1 Pa.C.S. § 1903). Finally, we bear in mind that words and phrases must be viewed “not ... in isolation, but ... with reference to the context in which they appear.” Meyer v. Comm. Coll. of Beaver Cnty., 625 Pa. 563, 93 A.3d 806, 813 (2014).

Thus, our initial inquiry is whether the plain language of Section 2’s provision that “owner” means a “person who has an interest in the real property that is improved and who ordered the improvement to be made,” and includes “agents of the owner acting with their authority,” 73 P.S. § 502, is clear and unambiguous with respect to agent liability. We conclude it is not. On the one hand, as SBA argues, one can read Section 2’s definition of owner — as including “agents of the owner acting with their authority” — to indicate that such agents are equivalent to owners for purposes of the statute. Under such a reading, an owner’s agent would share the owner’s statutory obligations to timely pay contractors, as well as potential liability where contractors are not timely paid. On the other hand, as the lower courts concluded, one can read Section 2’s first clause — defining an “owner” as “[a] person who has an interest in the real property that is improved and who ordered the improvement to be made” — as the term’s definition. Under that view, Section 2’s second clause — providing that “[t]he term includes successors in interest of the owner and agents of the owner acting with their authority”— as, essentially, a proviso (albeit an awkward one) modifying the first clause and clarifying that an owner remains liable under CASPA’s operative provisions notwithstanding the owner’s employment of an agent to order the subject improvements, or the owner’s conveyance of its interest in the subject property to another entity. In our view, both constructions are reasonable interpretations of Section 2’s text, and, accordingly, we conclude that Section 2 is ambiguous with respect to agent liability.

Where statutory language is ambiguous, this Court resolves such ambiguity by considering, inter alia, the occasion and necessity for the statute; the circumstances under which it was enacted; the mischief to be remedied; the object to be attained; the former law, if any, including other statutes upon the same or similar subjects; the consequences of a particular interpretation; and contemporaneous legislative history. 1 Pa. C.S. § 1921(c). Furthermore, subject to several exceptions for particular types of statutes not implicated herein, we liberally construe statutes “to effect their objects and promote justice.” 1 Pa.C.S. § 1928(c). Thus, we assess the foregoing factors to determine which of the parties’ views is most consistent with legislative intent.

We begin our inquiry in this regard with a brief review of the law concerning timely payment of contractors prior to CASPA’s enactment, the legislative history attendant CAS-PA’s passage, and its substantive effect. Prior to CASPA’s enactment, an unpaid contractor would typically pursue a breach of contract claim against the property owner. Yet, a contractor so proceeding could face a series of potential pitfalls. Under traditional contract law, a contractor was entitled to payment according to the terms of its contract, or, in the absence of such a term, within a “reasonable time” or upon completion of its work. See 17 C.J.S. Contracts § 79. Under these standards, a contractor would face the option of potentially costly litigation over whether delays in payment were “reasonable,” or awaiting the conclusion of its work to be paid, an unsatisfying option for large and lengthy construction projects. Similarly, under traditional contract law, an unpaid contractor would be required to pay its own litigation costs, including attorneys’ fees and expenses. See 20 C.J.S. Costs §§ 3, 173. Thus, if a contractor’s damages were less than the cost of litigation, it might well be dissuaded from vindicating its rights.

In 1994, however, the General Assembly considered H.B. 906, the legislation which became CASPA, then subtitled “[an act requiring] timely payment to certain contractors and subcontractors; and providing remedies to contractors and subcontractors.” Engaging in no floor debate whatsoever, the legislature passed H.B. 906 in near-unanimous votes before the House and Senate. CASPA displaced the common law standards vis-á-vis what constitutes timely payment in the context of construction contracts with, as detailed above, a statutorily-specified timetable, and provided additional incentives — in the form of interest payments at a statutorily-provided rate, penalty damages, reasonable attorneys’ fees, and costs — that reduced the aforementioned disincentives for contractors to pursue their contractual rights.

In our view, the General Assembly in enacting CASPA intended to address the problems inherent in reliance on common law contract doctrine to solve payment disputes in the construction field, and did not intend, as SBA suggests, to impose liability on agents. First, we note that CASPA’s subtitle focuses on two subjects — timely payment and remedies— and does not suggest that its provisions impose liability on non-contracting parties.

Second, SBA’s claim that Section 2 permits a contractor to recover from a property owner’s agents creates tension with Section 4’s provision that “[performance by a contractor ... in accordance with the provisions of a contract shall entitle the contractor or subcontractor to payment from the party with whom the contractor ... has contracted,” 73 P.S. § 504 (emphasis added), and Section 7(a)’s similar focus on contracting parties, see 73 P.S. § 507(a) (providing that a subcontractor is entitled to payment “from the party with whom the subcontractor has contracted”). Plainly, SBA’s approach would extend a contractor’s right to payment beyond that contemplated in Sections 4 and 7, as agents are not ordinarily parties to their principals’ construction contracts. Likewise, SBA’s interpretation of Section 2 is difficult to reconcile with the myriad provisions of CASPA which regard a construction contract as central to a contractor’s claim. See, e.g., 73 P.S. § 504 (conditioning entitlement to payment on “[performance ... in accordance with the provisions of a contract”); 73 P.S. § 505 (requiring payment in strict compliance with “the terms of the construction contract”); 73 P.S. § 506(a) (permitting owners to withhold payments for deficiently performed work “according to the terms of the construction contract”). SBA’s view of the statute dispenses with that centrality, and extends liability to agents, who, again, may be entirely foreign to the agreement. Although SBA correctly notes that Sections 5 through 12 also set forth the liability of “owners,” in our view, the only way to harmoniously view CASPA, as a whole, is to conclude that Sections 5 through 12 do not intend thereby to impose agency liability.

Third, SBA’s interpretation would require that a property owner’s agents personally assume the obligations of the owner’s construction contracts with respect to payments to contractors, contrary to longstanding and fundamental common law agency principles. See Vernon D. Cox & Co. v. Giles, 267 Pa.Super. 411, 406 A.2d 1107, 1110 & n. 4 (1979) (noting that it “is a basic tenet of agency law that an individual acting as an agent for a disclosed principle [sic] is not personally liable on a contract between the principle [sic] and a third party unless the agent specifically agrees to assume liability” and that “[t]he fact that a corporate officer cannot be held personally liable on contracts entered into while acting in his corporate capacity is a particular application of this principle”) (citing, inter alia, Revere Press v. Blumberg, 431 Pa. 370, 246 A.2d 407 (1968); Yentis v. Mills, 299 Pa. 25, 148 A. 909 (1930); Restatement (Second) of Agency § 320 (1958)). Had the General Assembly intended to do so, we conclude it would have made a clearer statement to that effect, rather than resort to an ambiguous clause in a definitional provision such as Section 502. Accord Delaware River Port Auth. v. Pa. Public Utility Comm’n, 393 Pa. 639, 145 A.2d 172, 175-76 (1958) (noting that this Court presumes that the General Assembly, in enacting changes to the common law, will make an express statement). Indeed, it is a fair inference that a law imposing personal liability on agents who authorize construction work would occasion some meaningful debate or dissent, and, as noted, CASPA generated none in the legislature. While SBA asserts that its interpretation merely requires only high-level decision-making agents to personally guarantee their principals’ construction projects, tellingly, SBA offers nothing in CAS-PA’s text that would suggest such a limitation.

Moreover, we find SBA’s argument that Section 2 is analogous to Section 260.2a of the WPCL unpersuasive. As an initial matter, we note that this Court has not definitively interpreted Section 260.2a as permitting an employee to bring an action against its employer’s agents. In any event, we note that SBA has offered no legislative history or prior decisional law demonstrating that Section 260.2a was, in fact, a model for Section 2 of CASPA. Furthermore, we find that the language of the respective sections is not sufficiently similar to compel the conclusion that they be similarly construed. As noted supra, Section 2’s definition of “owner” is composed of two parts, defining owner as “[a] person who has an interest in the real property ... and who ordered the improvement to be made,” and adding a proviso that “[t]he term includes successors in interest of the owner and agents of the owner acting with their authority.” 73 P.S. § 602. By contrast, Section 260.2(a)’s definition of “employer” is a single, continuous list of qualifying entities that is not similarly structurally divisible. See supra note 5. We thus find SBA’s analogy inapt.

In sum, for the foregoing reasons, we hold a contractor may not maintain an action under CASPA against a property owner’s agents. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the Superior Court.

Order affirmed.

Chief Justice Saylor and Justices Baer, Donohue and Dougherty join the opinion.

Justice Wecht did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

      . 73 P.S. §§ 501 etseq.

      . With respect to subcontractors, Section 7(a) of CASPA likewise provides that a subcontractor is entitled to "payment from the party with whom the subcontractor has contracted." 73 P.S. § 507(a).

      . Section 7 imposes parallel obligations on contractors and subcontractors vis-a-vis their own subcontractors. See 73 P.S. § 507.

      . See Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendant Robert W. DeBolt, 4/1/10, at 7; Memorandum of Law In Support of the Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendant Robert W. DeBolt, 4/1/10, at 6-7.

      . See Memorandum of Law of Plaintiff Scungio Borst & Associates in Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendants, 4/1/2013, at 12-14 (R.R. at 43-53).

      . 43 P.S. §§ 260.1 etseq.

      . See 43 P.S. § 260,2a. Section 260.2a defines an "employer,” as "every person, firm, partnership, association, corporation, receiver, or other officer of a court of this Commonwealth and any agent or officer of any of the above-mentioned classes employing any person in this Commonwealth.”

      . See Second Supplemental Memorandum of Law of Plaintiff Scungio Borst & Associates in Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment of Robert DeBolt, undated, at 1-3 (R.R. at 66-68).

      . 410 SLD and Kenworth did not appeal the judgment against them and are not involved in the instant appeal.

      . See, inter alia, Ward v. Whalen, 18 Pa. D. & C.3d 710 (Ct.Com.Pl.Allegheny 1981) (Wettick, J.) (interpreting Section 260.2a as permitting actions against agents in their personal capacities); Amalgamated Cotton Garment and Allied Indus. Fund v. Dion, 341 Pa.Super. 12, 491 A.3d 123 (1985) (approving Ward but limiting it to instances where an employer itself defaults); Mohney v. McClure, 390 Pa.Super. 338, 568 A.2d 682 (1990) (holding that such actions are permissible only against officers and agents involved in salient decision-making).

      . Act of Feb. 17, 1994, P.L. 73, No. 7 § 1.

      . Our view of CASPA’s purpose in this regard is consistent with numerous decisions describing CASPA as protecting contractors and subcontractors by encouraging fair dealing among parties to construction contracts, which stem largely from Judge R, Stanton Wetticlc’s decision in Richardson v, Sherman, 26 Pa. D. & C.4th 193 (Ct.Com.Pl.Allegheny 1996). See, e.g., Nippes v. Lucas, 815 A.2d 648 (Pa.Super.2003); R.W. Sidley, Inc, v. U.S. Fidelity & Guar. Co., 319 F.Supp.2d 554 (W.D.Pa.2004); Ruthrauff, supra; Zimmerman v. Harrisburg Fudd I, L.P., 984 A.2d 497 (Pa.Super.2009); Lomas v. Kravitz, 130 A,3d 107 (Pa.Super.2015).


source: Caselaw Access Project

license: Public Domain

text:
    SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
    140 A.3d 11-15
    B.G.M., In re; T.M., In re
    06/15/2016
    293 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 590


text:
    B.M.G., In re Adoption of; M.L.D., In re; S.T.G., In re Adoption of
    05/02/2016
    106, 107 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 590


text:
    C.T., In re; K.T., In re
    05/20/2016
    119 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 136 A.3d 1027


text:
    Com. v. Baney

    06/06/2016
    39 MAL (2016)

      . Justice WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 660


text:
    Com. v. Banks
    05/24/2016
    683 EAL (2015)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 492


text:
    Com. v. Bumpess
    05/31/2016
    603 EAL (2015)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 133 A.3d 74


text:
    Com. v. Burton
    05/31/2016
    837 MAL (2015)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 94


text:
    Com. v. Carter
    06/01/2016
    5 MAL (016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 111 A.3d 1221


text:
    Com. v. Cubbins
    06/01/2016
    425 WAL (2015)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 133 A.3d 82


text:
    Com. v. Davis
    05/31/2016
    55 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 136 A.3d 1030


text:
    Com. v. Deschu
    06/01/2016
    811 MAL (2015)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 133 A.3d 81


text:
    Com. v. Epps
    05/24/2016
    704 EAL (2015)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 502


text:
    Com. v. Fink
    06/15/2016
    108 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 55 A.3d 141


text:
    Com. v. Gaffney
    05/31/2016
    619 EAL (2015)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 133 A.3d 83


text:
    Com. v. Glass
    05/24/2016
    965 MAL (2015)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 92


text:
    Com. v. Grayson
    05/31/2016
    84 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 583


text:
    Com. v. Guzman-Rodriguez

    06/15/2016
    109, 110 MAL (2016)

      . Justice WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 133 A.3d 65


text:
    Com. v. Haynes

    06/01/2016
    627 EAL (2015)

      . Justice DONOHUE and WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 125 A.3d 800


text:
    Com. v. Hunter
    06/06/2016
    51 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 136 A.3d 1029


text:
    Com. v. Hunter

    05/31/2016
    631 EAL (2015)

      . Justice DONOHUE did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 101


text:
    Com. v. Ianozi
    06/15/2016
    173 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 136 A.3d 1040


text:
    Com. v. Jackson
    06/15/2016
    128 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 136 A.3d 1030


text:
    Com. v. Jefferson
    06/01/2016
    437 WAL (2015)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 95


text:
    Com. v. Johnson
    06/02/2016
    172 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 591


text:
    Com. v. Keith
    06/15/2016
    86 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 588


text:
    Com. v. King

    06/01/2016
    698 EAL (2015)

      . Justice WECHT did not participate in. the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 500


text:
    Com. v. Kriegler

    06/15/2016
    3 MAL (2016)

      . Justice WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 127 A.3d 840


text:
    Com. v. Lanier
    05/24/2016
    50 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 136 A.3d 1026


text:
    Com. v. Madison
    06/15/2016
    74 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 136 A.3d 1038


text:
    Com. v. Markoski

    06/01/2016
    806 MAL (2015)

      . Justice DONOHUE and WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 133 A.3d 80


text:
    Com. v. McNally
    06/15/2016
    18 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 659


text:
    Com. v. Merriweather
    05/31/2016
    611 EAL (2015)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 133 A.3d 83


text:
    Com. v. Neely
    06/02/2016
    32 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 125 A.3d 454


text:
    Com. v. Raco

    06/01/2016
    473 WAL (2015)

      . Justice WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 479


text:
    Com. v. Rodriguez
    06/06/2016
    105 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 136 A.3d 1032


text:
    Com. v. Salley

    06/01/2016
    800 MAL (2015)

      . Justice WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 105 A.3d 24


text:
    Com. v. Saunders
    06/15/2016
    706 EAL (2015)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 102


text:
    Com. v. Shealey
    05/31/2016
    441 WAL (2015)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 122 A.3d 1123


text:
    Com. v. Speece

    06/01/2016
    790 MAL (2015)

      . Justice DONOHUE and WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 133 A.3d 75


text:
    Com. v. Spence
    05/24/2016
    16 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 658


text:
    Com. v. Spuck

    06/15/2016
    131, 132 WAL (2016)

      . Justice WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 659


text:
    Com. v. Steckley

    05/24/2016
    988 MAL (2015)

      . Justice WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 128 A.3d 826


text:
    Com. v. Trinidad
    05/24/2016
    707 EAL (2015)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 64 A.3d 279


text:
    Com. v. Trumper

    05/24/2016
    926 MAL (2015)

      . Justice WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 122 A.3d 1146


text:
    Com. v. Wallace
    06/15/2016
    120 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 501


text:
    Com. v. Weaver

    06/01/2016
    836 MAL (2015)

      . Justice DONOHUE did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 94


text:
    Com. v. White
    06/15/2016
    62 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 136 A.3d 1036


text:
    Com. v. Williams
    06/15/2016
    35 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 669


text:
    Conyers-Carson v. Germantown Homes
    06/02/2016
    41 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 136 A.3d 1030


text:
    Dewing v. Abarta Oil & Gas Co., Inc.
    05/02/2016
    753 MAL (2015)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 133 A.3d 64


text:
    Dicenzo v. Heary
    06/01/2016
    57 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 136 A.3d 1028


text:
    EQT Production Co. v. Bochter
    06/01/2016
    432 WAL (2015)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 125 A.3d 460


text:
    Feingold v. Brody
    06/02/2016
    39 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 136 A.3d 1025


text:
    Fell v. 340 Associates, LLC
    06/01/2016
    821 MAL (2015)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 125 A.3d 75


text:
    G.J.A., In re Adoption of; P.H.A., In re
    06/15/2016
    172 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 208


text:
    K.E.S., In re Adoption of; A.M.S., In re
    05/02/2016
    199 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 593


text:
    Muhammad v. Norris

    06/02/2016
    48 WAL (2016)

      . Justice WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 96


text:
    P J.W.P., In re; T.D.W.-J, In re; J.T.Q.-W., In re
    06/01/2016
    126, 127 EAL (2016)
   Denied


text:
    P.N., In re

    06/01/2016
    839 MAL (2015)

      . Justice WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 110


text:
    Randall v. Adelberg Rudow Dorf & Hendler, LLC
    06/02/2016
    22 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 654


text:
    Reifer v. Westport Ins. Co.

    05/24/2016
    979 MAL (2015)

      . Justice WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 500


text:
    Tuzzato v. Tuzzato
    05/02/2016
    780 MAL (2015)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 133 A.3d 72


text:
    Vensko v. Encompass Home and Auto Ins. Co.
    05/02/2016
    407 WAL (2015)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 133 A.3d 68


text:
    Wright v. Misty Mountain Farm, LLC
    06/15/2016
    38 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 125 A.3d 814


text:
    Com. v. Eckenrode
    06/15/2016
    86 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Cmwlth., 130 A.3d 163


text:
    Dauphin County Indus. Development Authority v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Com’n; Pennsylvania Public Utility Com’n, In re; PPL Elec., Utilities, Inc., In re
    06/01/2016
    904, 905 MAL (2015)
   Denied

Pa.Cmwlth., 123 A.3d 1124


text:
    Ferrone v. Onorato
    05/02/2016
    395 WAL (2015)
   Denied

Pa.Cmwlth., 118 A.3d 495


text:
    Heiko v. Philadelphia Zoning Bd. of Adjustment
    06/01/2016
    657 EAL (2015)
   Denied

Pa.Cmwlth., 124 A.3d 426


text:
    Indiana University of Pennsylvania v. Indiana County Bd. of Assessment Appeals
    06/01/2016
    419 WAL (2015)
   Denied

Pa.Cmwlth., 122 A.3d 1200


text:
    Pravco, Inc. v. W.C.A.B. (Marshall); Marshall, In re
    06/15/2016
    26 EAL (2016)
   Denied


text:
    Rebuildables Const., LLC v. W.C.A.B. (Clouthier)
    06/01/2016
    79 MAL (2016)
   Denied


text:
    Williams v. Sturm
    06/02/2016
    134 MAL (2016)
   Denied

No. 2122 CD 2015


text:
    SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
    141 A.3d 477-484
    A.M.H. v. J.K.
    06/07/2016
    342 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 145 A.3d 785


text:
    Bank of America, Nat. Ass’n v. Dyndal
    06/29/2016
    124 MAL (2016)
   Denied

No, 3388 EDA 2015


text:
    Carmen Enterprises, Inc. v. Murpenter, LLC
    06/30/2016
    829, 866 MAL (2015)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 131 A.3d 90


text:
    Charlton v. PMA Ins. Group

    06/28/2016
    54 EAL (2016)

      . Justice WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d481


text:
    Com. v. Alexander
    07/06/2016
    73 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 598


text:
    Com. v. Alleyne
    06/28/2016
    9 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 650


text:
    Com. v. Arndt
    07/06/2016
    188 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 190


text:
    Com. v. Baldish
    06/28/2016
    12 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 133 A.3d 72


text:
    Com. v. Bechtel
    06/16/2016
    176 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d584


text:
    Com. v. Bell
    07/07/2016
    189, 190 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 589


text:
    Com. v. Benito
    06/28/2016
    145 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 133 A.3d 333


text:
    Com. v. Bisazza
    06/23/2016
    148 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 596


text:
    Com. v. Brown
    06/08/2016
    40 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 136 A.3d 1031


text:
    Com. v. Brown
    06/22/2016
    80 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 600


text:
    Com. v. Burgess
    06/13/2016
    73 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 136 A.3d 1036


text:
    Com. v. Buxton
    06/13/2016
    84 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 583


text:
    Com. v. Caldwell
    07/06/2016
    71 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 96


text:
    Com. v. Carpenter
    07/07/2016
    130 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 186


text:
    Com. v. Cash

    06/29/2016
    123 MAL (2016)

      . Justice DONOHUE did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 667


text:
    Com. v. Coaston
    07/06/2016
    9 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 658


text:
    Com. v. Cosby
    06/20/2016
    326 MAL (2016)
   Denied

No. 488 EDA 2016


text:
    Com. v. Deiuliis
    06/30/2016
    102, 103 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 653


text:
    Com. v. Dominick

    06/29/2016
    96 MAL (2016)

      . Justice WECHT notes his dissent.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 136 A.3d 1025


text:
    Com. v. Flint

    06/16/2016
    69 MAL (2016)

      . Justice DONOHUE did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 664


text:
    Com. v. Flores
    06/28/2016
    171 MAL (2106)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 584


text:
    Com. v. Future
    06/22/2016
    114 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 136 A.3d 1028


text:
    Com. v. Gadson
    07/07/2016
    88 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 588


text:
    Com. v. Golphin
    06/30/2016
    84 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 105 A.3d 791


text:
    Com. v. Graham
    06/28/2016
    34 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 136 A.3d 1028


text:
    Com. v. Graves
    07/07/2016
    117 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 189


text:
    Com. v. Greene
    07/06/2016
    110 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 592


text:
    Com. v. Hairston
    06/13/2016
    490 WAL (2015)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 133 A.3d 74


text:
    Com. v. Hall

    06/30/2016
    21 WAL (2016)

      . Justice DONOHUE and WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 102


text:
    Com. v. Hansley
    06/23/2016
    117 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 136 A.3d 1035


text:
    Com. v. Harding
    07/06/2016
    150 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 581


text:
    Com. v. Henry

    06/28/2016
    3 EAL (2016)

      . Justice DONOHUE did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 652


text:
    Com. v. Hill
    06/22/2016
    91 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 590


text:
    Com. v. Hopkins

    06/28/2016
    468 WAL (2015)

      . Justice WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 131 A.3d 108


text:
    Com. v. Hoy
    07/07/2016
    216 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 202


text:
    Com. v. Idrrissa
    06/27/2016
    119 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 136 A.3d 1031


text:
    Com. v. Jackson
    06/22/2016
    66 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 595


text:
    Com. v. Johnson
    07/14/2016
    104 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 590


text:
    Com. v. Junious
    07/07/2016
    198 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 593


text:
    Com. v. Keeley
    06/08/2016
    143 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 587


text:
    Com. v. Leggett
    06/28/2016
    81 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 585


text:
    Com. v. Manning-Ruffin

    06/16/2016
    77 EAL (2016)

      . Justice WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 648


text:
    Com. v. Mattis
    07/07/2016
    101 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 603


text:
    Com. v. McCarthy
    06/13/2016
    67 WAL (2016)
   Denied


text:
    Com. v. McCoy

    06/23/2016
    16 EAL (2016)

      . Justice WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 656


text:
    Com. v. McDermott
    07/07/2016
    139 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 191


text:
    Com. v. Melograna

    06/16/2016
    106 MAL (2016)

      . Justice WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 484


text:
    Com. v. Montgomery
    06/30/2016
    77 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 136 A.3d 1035


text:
    Com. v. Murray

    06/29/2016
    44 EAL (2016)

      . Justice DONOHUE did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 479


text:
    Com. v. Palmer
    06/16/2016
    129 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 605


text:
    Com. v. Perry

    06/28/2016
    40 MAL (2016)

      . Justice WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 128 A.3d 1285


text:
    Com. v. Pointer
    07/14/2016
    43 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 668


text:
    Com. v. Presgraves
    06/29/2016
    133 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 136 A.3d 1036


text:
    Com. v. Prince.
    06/30/2016
    62 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 133 A.3d 79


text:
    Com. v. Pritchett
    06/08/2016
    76 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 496


text:
    Com. v. Provance
    06/23/2016
    96 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 592


text:
    Com. v. Reives.
    06/28/2016
    76 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d588


text:
    Com. v. Rivera.
    07/06/2016
    179 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 116 A.3d 676


text:
    Com. v. Robinson
    06/29/2016
    97 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 598


text:
    Com. v. Romansky
    07/06/2016
    184 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 590


text:
    Com. v. Rudd.
    06/29/2016
    69 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 601


text:
    Com. v. Samuels
    06/13/2016
    78 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 136 A.3d 1037


text:
    Com. v. Sands
    06/30/2016
    83 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 136 A.3d 1038


text:
    Com. v. Segraves
    07/07/2016
    178 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 594


text:
    Com. v. Settles
    06/08/2016
    45 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 136 A.3d 1030


text:
    Com. v. Shaw
    06/22/2016
    99 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 598


text:
    Com. v. Simeone
    06/08/2016
    80 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 668


text:
    Com. v. Smith.
    07/07/2016
    196 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 592


text:
    Com. v. Steel.
    06/29/2016
    113 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 602


text:
    Com. v. Thomas
    07/07/2016
    104 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 605


text:
    Com. v. Tuan Anh Le
    06/29/2016
    73 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 668


text:
    Com. v. Valentine
    06/22/2016
    72 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 589


text:
    Com. v. Venable
    07/14/2016
    92 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 588


text:
    Com. v. Walker
    07/07/2016
    244 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 203


text:
    Com. v. Walls.
    07/06/2016
    70 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 495


text:
    Com. v. Weedon
    06/22/2016
    125 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 136 A.3d 1032


text:
    Com. v. Wesby
    06/30/2016
    133 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 187


text:
    Com. v. West.
    06/22/2016
    87 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 136 A.3d 1038


text:
    Com. v. Williams
    06/22/2016
    167 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 584


text:
    Com. v. Willie
    06/16/2016
    66 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 136 A.3d 1034


text:
    Com. v. Wright.
    06/28/2016
    98 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 600


text:
    D.J.M., In re; R.A.M., In re; E.J.M., In re.
    07/14/2016
    246, 247 WAL (2016)
   Denied


text:
    Deutsche Bank Nat. Trust Co. v. Gardner .
    05/03/2016
    699 EAL (2015)

      . Reconsideration Denied June 16, 2016.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 125 A.3d 1221


text:
    Dibish v. Ameriprise Financial, Inc.
    07/07/2016
    113 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 1079


text:
    Estate of Bouher v. Giftwares Co., Inc. .
    06/22/2016
    78 MAL (2016)

      . Justice DONOHUE and WECHT did not participate in the consideration decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 106


text:
    Gray v. Denaples; Faruqi v. Solfanel-li; Solfanelli, In re
    06/22/2016
    91 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 136 A.3d 1024


text:
    Greim v. Wachterhauser.
    06/23/2016
    70 MAL (2016)

      . Justice DONOHUE did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 102


text:
    Herbert v. American Biltrite.
    06/21/2016
    61 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 136 A.3d 1030


text:
    Hinkal v. Pardoe
    07/06/2016
    142 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 133 A.3d 738


text:
    Hirnyk, In re Estate of; Weiblinger, In re.
    07/07/2016
    91 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 136 A.3d 1041


text:
    I.B.B., In re; F.R., In re; F.I.R., Jr., In re; B.M.B., In re; C.D.B., In re; C.K.R., In re.
    07/06/2016
    203-207 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Nos. 123, 1230, 1234, 1236, 1236, 1237 EDA 2015


text:
    J.J. v. M.C.; M.C.,In re; D.T., In re...
    01/20/2016
    844, 845 MAL (2015)

      . Justice EAKIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 95


text:
    J.R.W. v. E.J.W.
    06/24/2016
    338 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 213


text:
    Kline, In re; Biros, In re.
    06/28/2016
    101 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 136 A.3d 1028


text:
    Le Schack v. Le Schack
    06/08/2016
    71 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 136 A.3d 1036


text:
    Lichtman v. Bomstein .
    06/29/2016
    65 EAL (2016)

      . Justice DONOHUE and DOUGHERTY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 496


text:
    Lichtman v. Walton

    06/29/2016
    48 EAL (2016)

      . Justice DONOHUE and DOUGHERTY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 489


text:
    Mittereder v. Seven Springs Mountain Resort, Inc.
    06/16/2016
    23 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 664


text:
    Novack v. Novack
    07/06/2016
    245 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 191


text:
    Rumbold v. Richard Guzzetti, LLC
    06/23/2016
    77 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 486


text:
    Rush v. Rush; Rush, In re.
    06/21/2016
    49 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 620


text:
    S.B. v. H.D.
    06/09/2016
    199 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 145 A.3d 786


text:
    S.R., In re Adoption of; A.R., In re
    07/05/2016
    205 WAL (2016)
   Denied


text:
    S.R.M., In re Adoption of; R.M.B., In re
    06/30/2016
    194 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 145 A.3d 778


text:
    T.P.G., In re Adoption of
    07/19/2016
    229 WAL (2016)
   Denied


text:
    Tryboski v. Pennsylvania State University
    06/29/2016
    137 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 484


text:
    V.A.P. v. J.K.H.-G.
    07/11/2016
    223 WAL (2016)
   Denied

No. 493 WDA 2016


text:
    Walker v. Lancaster General
    07/12/2016
    158 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 585


text:
    Wilson v. Detwiler

    05/03/2016
    89 MAL (2016)

      . Reconsideration Denied June 28, 2016.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 653


text:
    Babb v. Plusa
    07/07/2016
    99 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Cmwlth., 130 A.3d 162


text:
    Baxter v. Unemployment Compensation Bd. of Review
    06/16/2016
    185 MAL (2016)
   Denied


text:
    Consol. Reports and Return by Tax Claims Bureau of Northumberland County, In re; Neff, In re
    07/12/2016
    141 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Cmwlth., 132 A.3d 637


text:
    Davis v. W.C.A.B. (PA Social Services Union)
    06/08/2016
    38 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Cmwlth., 131 A.3d 537


text:
    Diefenderfer v. Palmer Twp. Bd. of Supervisors
    07/06/2016
    67 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Cmwlth., 127 A.3d 881


text:
    Downingtown Area School Dist. v. Chester County Bd. of Assessment Appeals; LTK Associates LP, In re
    06/13/2016
    62 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Cmwlth., 131 A.3d 152


text:
    Fields v. W.C.A.B. (Abington School Dist.)
    07/06/2016
    168 MAL (2016)
   Denied

No. 785 CD 2015


text:
    Hartman v. Zoning Hearing Bd. of Cumru Twp.
    06/23/2016
    187 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Cmwlth., 133 A.3d 806


text:
    Kuehner v. SCI Dallas
    07/06/2016
    169 MAL (2016)
   Denied

No. 1785 CD 2015


text:
    Lauchle, In re; Curtis, In re
    06/27/2016
    93 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Cmwlth., 130 A.3d 161


text:
    Lauchle, In re; Curtis, In re
    06/27/2016
    94 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Cmwlth., 130 A.3d 161


text:
    Monger v. Upper Leacock Twp.
    06/22/2016
    107 MAL (2016)
   Denied

No. 374 CD 2015


text:
    Pennsylvanians for Union Reform v. Pennsylvania Office of Admin.
    06/08/2016
    53 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Cmwlth., 129 A.3d 1246


text:
    Price v. W.C.A.B. (School Dist. of Philadelphia)
    07/07/2016
    53 EAL (2016)
   Denied


text:
    PJD Entertainment, Inc. v. Department of Health, Bureau of Health Promotion and Risk Reduction
    07/06/2016
    153 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Cmwlth., 136 A.3d 1042


text:
    Schwartz v. Philadelphia Zoning Bd. of Adjustment
    06/07/2016
    675 EAL (2015)
   Denied

Pa.Cmwlth., 126 A.3d 1032


text:
    Snook v. Mifflin County Retirement Bd.
    07/12/2016
    140 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Cmwlth., 127 A.3d 894


text:
    Snyder v. Brecknock Twp.; Brecknock, in re
    06/16/2016
    47 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Cmwlth., 125 A.3d 880


text:
    Summit Academy v. Department of Human Services
    06/08/2016
    2 WAL (2016)
   Denied


text:
    Township of Sewickley v. Hampshire; Hamspshire, In re
    07/12/2016
    82 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Cmwlth., 130 A.3d 163


text:
    TWL Realty, LLC v. West Hanover Twp. Zoning Hearing Bd.
    06/08/2016
    87 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Cmwlth., 132 A.3d 533


text:
    Veronesi Bldg. and Remodeling, Inc. v. W.C.A.B. (Corvin)
    07/07/2016
    79 WAL (2016)
   Denied

No. 2002 CD 2014


text:
    Wagner v. Pennsylvania Capitol Police Dept.
    06/08/2016
    104 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Cmwlth., 132 A.3d 1051


text:
    Wright v. Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation and Parole
    07/14/2016
    166 MAL (2016)
   Denied

No. 877 CD 2015


text:
    Wyomissing Area School Dist. v. Zoning Hearing Bd. of Wyomissing Borough; "Stop the Fence" Group, In re
    06/13/2016
    116 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Cmwlth., 128 A.3d 851


text:
    Zenak v. Police Athletic League of Philadelphia
    07/07/2016
    57, 58 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Cmwlth., 132 A.3d 541


text:
    Ziegenfuss Drilling, Inc. v. W.C.A.B. (Dailey)
    06/08/2016
    51 MAL (2016)
   Denied


text:
    SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
    145 A.3d 161-169
    A.M.A., In re; C.A., In re

    08/03/2016
    357 MAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 145 A.3d 792


text:
    Acero Precision v. Bonelli
    07/19/2016
    209 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 659


text:
    Baker v. Baker
    07/19/2016
    112 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 666


text:
    Borovick v. Wilson

    07/27/2016
    105 WAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 136 A.3d 1038


text:
    Coluccio v. Karp

    07/19/2016
    180 MAL (2016)

      . Justice DONOHUE did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 503


text:
    Com. v. Alford

    08/03/2016
    18 MAL (2016)

      . Justice WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 661


text:
    Com. v. Arnold

    08/02/2016
    111 MAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 495


text:
    Com. v. Bailey
    08/02/2016
    148 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 192


text:
    Com. v. Baney
    10/26/2015
    490 MAL (2015)
   Denied

No. 28 MDM 2015


text:
    Com. v. Barrett
    07/19/2016
    159 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 582


text:
    Com. v. Berry

    07/27/2016
    138 EAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 186


text:
    Com. v. Bonner

    07/27/2016
    123 WAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 592


text:
    Com. v. Bost
    08/02/2016
    142 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 202


text:
    Com. v. Brown

    07/26/2016
    93 EAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 1097


text:
    Com. v. Brown

    07/27/2016
    207 MAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 596


text:
    Com. v. Buxton
    07/19/2016
    115 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 187


text:
    Com. v. Byrd

    07/26/2016
    109 EAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 602


text:
    Com. v. Campbell

    07/27/2016
    287 MAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 136 A.3d 1034


text:
    Com. v. Cole

    07/26/2016
    174 WAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 191


text:
    Com. v. Colton

    07/27/2016
    151-152 MAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 587


text:
    Com. v. Correa-Ayala

    07/27/2016
    241 MAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 199


text:
    Com. v. Cunningham
    08/02/2016
    177 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 145 A.3d 772


text:
    Com. v. Day

    08/02/2016
    250 MAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 205


text:
    Com. v. DePugh

    07/27/2016
    205 MAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 596


text:
    Com. v. Dill
    07/19/2016
    116 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 136 A.3d 1037


text:
    Com. v. Evans
    07/19/2016
    128 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 605


text:
    Com. v. Evans
    08/02/2016
    247 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 198


text:
    Com. v. Evans

    08/04/2016
    163 EAL (2016)

      . Justices DONOHUE and MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 649


text:
    Com. v. Frazier
    07/19/2016
    111 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 602


text:
    Com. v. Fryer

    08/03/2016
    15 EAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 480


text:
    Com. v. G.F.K.

    07/27/2016
    112 MAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 482


text:
    Com. v. Gibson
    07/20/2016
    328 MAL (2015)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 121 A.3d 1121


text:
    Com. v. Gregory

    07/26/2016
    83 EAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 588


text:
    Com. v. Grohowski

    07/26/2016
    204 MAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 593


text:
    Com. v. Guiher
    08/02/2016
    122 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 605


text:
    Com. v. Hawkins
    07/19/2016
    135 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 199


text:
    Com. v. Hawkins

    07/27/2016
    47 EAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 585


text:
    Com. v. Henderson

    02/01/2016
    827 MAL (2015)

      . Justice EAKIN did not participate in the decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 133 A.3d 66


text:
    Com. v. Herb

    08/03/2016
    54 MAL (2016)

      . Justice WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 664


text:
    Com. v. Hogan
    07/19/2016
    218 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 601


text:
    Com. v. Jenkins

    08/03/2016
    19 EAL (2016)

      . Justice WECHT did not participate in the decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 101


text:
    Com. v. Johnson
    07/19/2016
    109 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 592


text:
    Com. v. Johnson

    07/27/2016
    150 EAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 194


text:
    Com. v. Jones

    07/26/2016
    64 EAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 64 A.3d 371


text:
    Com. v. Jordan
    07/19/2016
    220 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 489


text:
    Com. v. Kinard
    08/02/2016
    136 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 187


text:
    Com. v. Lynn

    07/26/2016
    85 EAL (2016)

      . Justices DONOHUE and MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 664


text:
    Com. v. Marchetti
    08/02/2016
    134 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 212


text:
    Com. v. Markelwitz
    08/02/2016
    118 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 136 A.3d 1034


text:
    Com. v. McClaskey

    07/27/2016
    63 MAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 669


text:
    Com. v. McGeee

    07/27/2016
    160 MAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 136 A.3d 1040


text:
    Com. v. McMichael

    07/28/2016
    49 EAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 136 A.3d 1029


text:
    Com. v. Moten

    07/26/2016
    184 EAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied


text:
    Com. v. Mott

    07/26/2016
    101 WAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 187


text:
    Com. v. Mullarkey

    08/03/2016
    64 WAL (2016)

      . Justice DONOHUE did not participate in the decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 494


text:
    Com. v. Pascal

    08/02/2016
    144 MAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 136 A.3d 1038


text:
    Com. v. Patterson

    07/27/2016
    143 EAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 601


text:
    Com. v. Phillips

    07/27/2016
    225 MAL (2016)

      . Justices WECHT and MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 493


text:
    Com. v. Pinkney
    08/02/2016
    670 EAL (2015)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 648


text:
    Com. v. Richards

    08/02/2016
    60 EAL (2016)

      . Justices DONOHUE and MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 128 A.3d 786


text:
    Com. v. Rodriguez
    07/19/2016
    125 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 603


text:
    Com. v. Roseboro

    07/27/2016
    141 EAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 193


text:
    Com. v. Sanchez

    07/26/2016
    176 EAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 81 A.3d 990


text:
    Com. v. Sattazahn
    08/02/2016
    161 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 128 A.3d 291


text:
    Com. v. Scott

    07/27/2016
    256 MAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 44 A.3d 199


text:
    Com. v. Serrano

    07/26/2016
    253 MAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 198


text:
    Com. v. Shick
    07/19/2016
    100 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 136 A.3d 1033


text:
    Com. v. Slaughter
    07/19/2016
    100 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 136 A.3d 1037


text:
    Com. v. Smith
    08/04/2016
    238 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 87 A.3d 375


text:
    Com. v. Snipes

    08/02/2016
    134 EAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 194


text:
    Com. v. Snowden

    07/26/2016
    289 MAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 210


text:
    Com. v. Szekeres

    07/27/2016
    31 MAL (2016)

      . Justices WECHT and MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 660


text:
    Com. v. Thompson
    08/08/2016
    270 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 145 A.3d 770


text:
    Com. v. Tricome
    07/19/2016
    186 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 588


text:
    Com. v. Vasquez
    07/19/2016
    121 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 601


text:
    Com. v. Vicks
    07/19/2016
    144 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 209


text:
    Com. v. Villanueva

    07/27/2016
    296 MAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 145 A.3d 771


text:
    Com. v. White
    07/19/2016
    78 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 587


text:
    Com. v. Williams

    07/27/2016
    152 WAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 197


text:
    Com. v. Yingling
    08/02/2016
    62 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 592


text:
    Com. v. Yingling

    08/04/2016
    279-281 MAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 207


text:
    Com. v. Zaffino
    08/03/2016
    102 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 485


text:
    Coyle v. Coyle
    08/03/2016
    29 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 664


text:
    D.S., In re Adoption of; J.S.-G, In re; B.C. In re Adoption of; J.C., In re Adoption of

    02/01/2016
    859 MAL (2015)

      . Justice EAKIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 100


text:
    D.V.M.R., In re; G.R., In re
    07/18/2016
    386 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 190


text:
    Devlin's Pointe Apartments v. Rouse

    07/27/2016
    97 WAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

No. 1988 WDA 2015


text:
    E.C., In re; N.C., In re

    08/09/2016
    405 MAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied


text:
    E.C.K., In re; E.N.K, In re

    02/01/2016
    963 MAL (2015)

      . Justice EAKIN and Justice WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter; Justice DONOHUE and Justice DOUGHERTY dissent.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 504


text:
    Fessler v. Watchtower Bible and Tract Soc. of New York, Inc.

    07/27/2016
    122 EAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 131 A.3d 44


text:
    Fiedler, In re; Bitts, In re
    08/03/2016
    95 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 132 A.3d 1010


text:
    Gorham v. Gorham
    08/02/2016
    195 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 589


text:
    Harper v. Salameh
    07/19/2016
    133 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 606


text:
    Harrington, In re Estate of
    07/19/2016
    156 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 136 A.3d 1038


text:
    J.M.R., In re

    07/26/2016
    277 MAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter,

   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 203


text:
    JRD Development Co., LLC v. Schilit
    07/19/2016
    153 WAL (2016)
   Denied


text:
    Kennedy v. Robert Morris University
    08/02/2016
    93-94 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 133 A.3d 38


text:
    Knoll v. Uku

    08/02/2016
    72 WAL (2016)

      . Justice WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 146 A.3d 1033


text:
    Knoll v. Uku

    08/02/2016
    70 WAL (2016)

      . Justice WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 136 A.3d 1033


text:
    Kodenkandeth v. Kodenkandeth
    07/19/2016
    108 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 600


text:
    Krichmar, In re Estate of; Krichmar, In re; Spigler, In re
    08/02/2016
    94-95 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 646


text:
    M.E.B. v. J.D.J.
    07/19/2016
    393 MAL (2016)
   Denied


text:
    Maryland Cas. Co. v. McGrath

    07/26/2016
    230 MAL (2016)

      . Justices WECHT and Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 662


text:
    McKesson Corp. v. Campbell

    08/04/2016
    80 EAL (2016)

      . Justices DONOHUE and WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 502


text:
    Oliver v. Ball

    07/27/2016
    116 WAL (2016)

      . Justices DONOHUE and MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 136 A.3d 162


text:
    Payne, In re; Com., In re

    08/03/2016
    85 MAL (2016)

      . Justices DONOHUE and MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 129 A.3d 546


text:
    Pennlyco, Ltd. v. International Development Corp.
    07/19/2016
    138 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 486


text:
    R.E.M. v. F.D.F.

    02/01/2016
    953 MAL (2015)

      . Justice EAKIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied


text:
    Real v. Real

    07/27/2016
    200 MAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 657


text:
    Renz v. Ingles

    07/27/2016
    194 MAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter,

   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 593


text:
    Robins v. Freeman

    07/27/2016
    229 MAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 188


text:
    S.A.H. v. D.E.P.

    02/01/2016
    442 WAL (2015)

      . Justice EAKIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 131 A.3d 101


text:
    Smolsky, In re Estate of

    07/27/2016
    193 MAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 586


text:
    Z.M., In re
    08/02/2016
    192 EAL (2016)
   Denied


text:
    A. Gadley Enterprises, Inc. v. Department of Labor and Industry, Office of Unemployment Compensation Tax Services
    08/02/2016
    52 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 1131


text:
    Brockway Borough Mun. Authority v. Department of Environmental Protection
    08/03/2016
    47 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa. Super., 131 A.3d 578


text:
    Berks Area Regional Transportation Authority v. W.C.A.B.

    07/27/2016
    235 MAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied


text:
    Com., Dept. of Transp., In re; Row-Row, LLC, In re
    08/03/2016
    55 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 131 A.3d 625


text:
    Dauphin County Tax Sale of 2013, In re; Hester, In re

    07/27/2016
    215 MAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 130 A.3d 162


text:
    Department of Labor and Industry, Office of Unemployment Compensation Benefits Policy v. Unemployment Compensation Bd. of Review
    07/19/2016
    100 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 131 A.3d 597


text:
    Edinboro University of Pennsylvania State System of Higher Educ. v. Association of Pennsylvania State College and University Faculties
    08/03/2016
    37 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 128 A.3d 322


text:
    Friday v. W.C.A.B. (Pennsylvania State University)
    07/19/2016
    58 WAL (2016)
   Denied

No. 560 CD 2015, 559 CD 2015


text:
    Keith v. W.C.A.B. (SEPTA)

    07/27/2016
    108 EAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied


text:
    Kretschmann Farm, LLC v. Township of New Sewickley
    08/03/2016
    56 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 131 A.3d 1044


text:
    Petsinger v. Pennsylvania Dept. of Labor and Industry, Bureau of Labor Law Compliance

    07/27/2016
    201 MAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

No. 1842 CD 2015


text:
    Richard Allen Preparatory Charter School v. School Dist. of Philadelphia

    07/27/2016
    561-568 EAL (2015)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 123 A.3d 1101


text:
    SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
    145 A.3d 722-729
    Bailey v. Elder; Hoyt Royalty, LLC, In re
    09/07/2016
    945 MAL (2015)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 484


text:
    Barnhart v. Barnhart

    06/29/2016
    85 WAL (2016)

      . Reconsideration Denied August 8, 2016.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 492


text:
    Bezjak v. Diamond
    08/30/2016
    165 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 623


text:
    Blackhawk Neff, Inc. v. Kusevich Contracting, Inc.
    09/06/2016
    118 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 606


text:
    Bochetto & Lentz P.C. v. Datz
    08/30/2016
    185 EAL (1026)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 586


text:
    Burda v. Korenman
    08/10/2016
    213 MAL (2016)
   Denied

No. 3797 EDA 2015


text:
    Carmon v. Coleman
    08/10/2016
    212 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 188


text:
    Cerf v. McNeil

    09/06/2016
    105 EAL (2016)

      . Justice DONOHUE and MUNDY did not participate in the decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super,, 135 A.3d 663


text:
    Com. v. A J.H.
    08/17/2016
    135 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 201


text:
    Com. v. Adams
    08/10/2016
    137 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 108 A.3d 107


text:
    Com. v. Adkins
    08/10/2016
    153 EAL (2016)
   Denied

No. 1782 EDA 2015


text:
    Com. v. Alvarez-Mendoza
    08/23/2016
    621 EAL (2015)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 101


text:
    Com. v. Arias
    08/30/2016
    139 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 136 A.3d 1036


text:
    Com. v. Bocelli
    08/23/2016
    273 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 599


text:
    Com. v. Bonaparte
    08/30/2016
    89 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 595


text:
    Com. v. Bradley

    08/30/2016
    179 WAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 145 A.3d 771


text:
    Com. v. Britt
    08/24/2016
    142 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 206


text:
    Com. v. Brown

    08/23/2016
    16 MAL (2016)

      . Justice WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 652


text:
    Com. v. Cabassa
    08/24/2016
    324 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 145 A.3d 776


text:
    Com. v. Canada

    08/30/2016
    82 EAL (2016)

      . Justice DONOHUE and MUNDY did not participate in the decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 211


text:
    Com. v. Chester

    08/16/2016
    168 EAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 206


text:
    Com. v. Corbin
    08/30/2016
    188 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 145 A.3d 785


text:
    Com. v. Crespo

    08/23/2016
    534 MAL (2015)

      . Justice DONOHUE did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 122 A.3d 1129


text:
    Com. v. Croasmun
    08/17/2016
    163 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 205


text:
    Com. v. Crooks
    08/24/2016
    186 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super,, 145 A.3d 777


text:
    Com. v. Cross-Hill

    07/06/2016
    141 WAL (2016)

      . Reconsideration Denied August 15, 2016.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 602


text:
    Com. v. Dartoe
    08/10/2016
    106 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 598


text:
    Com. v. Davis
    08/17/2016
    171 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 145 A.3d 773


text:
    Com. v. Dip
    08/24/2016
    149 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 194


text:
    Com. v. Dodson
    08/22/2016
    246 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 188


text:
    Com. v. Elansari

    08/23/2016
    236 MAL (2016)

      . Reconsideration Denied September 30, 2016.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 603


text:
    Com. v. Ely
    08/16/2016
    173 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 145 A.3d 771


text:
    Com. v. Escobar
    08/25/2016
    175 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 145 A.3d 782


text:
    Com. v. Fleming
    09/07/2016
    140 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 191


text:
    Com. v. Franklin

    08/23/2016
    192 MAL (2016)

      . Justice WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 662


text:
    Com. v. Garfield

    08/23/2016
    315 MAL (2015)

      . Justice WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 120 A.3d 1061


text:
    Com. v. Gelsinger
    08/22/2016
    290 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 210


text:
    Com. v. Giunta

    08/10/2016
    157 MAL (2016)

      . Justice WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 502


text:
    Com. v. Harvey
    08/18/2016
    138 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 195


text:
    Com. v. Haynes
    08/18/2016
    147 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 193


text:
    Com. v. Hendel
    09/06/2016
    212 EAL (2016)
   Denied


text:
    Com. v. Jaynes
    08/25/2016
    129 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 606


text:
    Com. v. Jessee

    08/23/2016
    752 MAL (2015)

      . Justice WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 131 A.3d 108


text:
    Com. v. Johnson
    08/23/2016
    158 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 199


text:
    Com. v. Jones
    08/23/2016
    92 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 187


text:
    Com. v. Kennedy
    08/17/2016
    165 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 205


text:
    Com. v. Konias
    08/10/2016
    162 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super,, 136 A.3d 1014


text:
    Com. v. Laureano
    08/30/2016
    226 EAL (2016)
   Denied


text:
    Com. v. Little
    09/07/2016
    165 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 587


text:
    Com. v. Luchsinger
    08/16/2016
    255 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 201


text:
    Com. v. Maines
    09/06/2016
    227 WAL (2016)
   Denied


text:
    Com. v. Malone
    08/25/2016
    107 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 598


text:
    Com. v. Mandrum
    08/23/2016
    112 EAL (2015)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 120 A.3d 368


text:
    Com. v. Martinez
    08/30/2016
    118 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 189


text:
    Com. v. Mason
    08/22/2016
    325 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 198


text:
    Com. v. Mays
    08/17/2016
    193 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 145 A.3d 785


text:
    Com. v. McDade
    08/17/2016
    25 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 93


text:
    Com. v. McGrath
    08/10/2016
    103 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 646


text:
    Com. v. Miller
    08/10/2016
    154 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 206


text:
    Com. v. Mitchell
    08/30/2016
    137 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 1097


text:
    Com. v. Molino
    08/30/2016
    174 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 145 A.3d 772


text:
    Com. v. Nieves
    08/10/2016
    623 MAL (2015)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 125 A.3d 460


text:
    Com. v. Nunez
    08/17/2016
    257 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 198


text:
    Com. v. Ortiz-Lugo
    08/23/2016
    310 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 145 A.3d 770


text:
    Com. v. Owens

    08/17/2016
    267 MAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 200


text:
    Com. v. Patton
    08/10/2016
    128 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 590


text:
    Com. v. Paxos

    08/30/2016
    163 MAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 136 A.3d 1040


text:
    Com. v. Perkins

    08/24/2016
    178 EAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

No. 210 EDA 2015


text:
    Com. v. Pollard

    08/30/2016
    155 MAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 136 A.3d 1039


text:
    Com. v. Pouliczec

    08/01/2016
    95-96 EM (2016)

      . Justice DONOHUE and MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super,, 135 A.3d 666


text:
    Com. v. Prophete
    08/16/2016
    171 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 210


text:
    Com. v. Ramey
    08/23/2016
    278 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 136 A.3d 1031


text:
    Com. v. Riley
    09/06/2016
    164 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 136 A.3d 1026


text:
    Com. v. Roberts

    09/06/2016
    174 MAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 133 A.3d 759


text:
    Com. v. Robinson
    08/10/2016
    177 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 585


text:
    Com. v. Rodriguez
    08/11/2016
    332 MAL (2016)
   Denied

No. 896 EDA 2015


text:
    Com. v. Ross
    08/18/2016
    196 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 43 A.3d 523


text:
    Com. v. Rugg
    08/25/2016
    117 WAL (2015)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 120 A.3d 387


text:
    Com. v. Samuels
    09/07/2016
    209 EAL (2016)
   Denied


text:
    Com. v. Schenck
    08/30/2016
    229 EAL (2016)
   Denied


text:
    Com. v. Sheerer
    08/23/2016
    151 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 595


text:
    Com. v. Shields
    08/18/2016
    156 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 200


text:
    Com. v. Shlewiet

    08/17/2016
    269 MAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 213


text:
    Com. v. Simmers
    08/11/2016
    309 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 145 A.3d 775


text:
    Com. v. Smith
    08/29/2016
    259 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 136 A.3d 1025


text:
    Com. v. Smith
    08/24/2016
    239 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 189


text:
    Com. v. Smith
    08/25/2016
    146 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 193


text:
    Com. v. Sosa
    08/23/2016
    139 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 186


text:
    Com. v. Spring

    09/06/2016
    191 WAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super,, 145 A.3d 780


text:
    Com. v. Srock
    08/10/2016
    175 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 586


text:
    Com. v. Stockton
    08/17/2016
    160 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 200


text:
    Com. v. Thomas
    08/30/2016
    159 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 585


text:
    Com. v. Titus
    08/10/2016
    203 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 596


text:
    Com. v. Tri Thanh Nguyen

    08/24/2016
    227 MAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 202


text:
    Com. v. Trollinger
    08/10/2016
    892 MAL (2015)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 108


text:
    Com. v. Voneida
    08/30/2016
    266 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 136 A.3d 1025


text:
    Com. v. Wall
    08/24/2016
    161 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 202


text:
    Com. v. Waltemyer
    08/17/2016
    282 MAL (2016)
   Denied

No. 975 EDA 2015


text:
    Com. v. Wells
    08/16/2016
    112, 114, 115 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 602


text:
    Com. v. Williams
    08/10/2016
    216 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 145 A.3d 796


text:
    Com. v. Williams
    08/30/2016
    173 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 207


text:
    Com. v. Wolfe

    08/25/2016
    93 MAL (2015)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Dismissed

Pa.Super., 106 A.3d 800


text:
    Com. v. Woods
    08/24/2016
    150 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 197


text:
    Com. v. Woodward
    09/06/2016
    111 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 606


text:
    D.A.C. v. J.E.H.
    08/17/2016
    237 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 602


text:
    Dougherty v. Philadelphia Newspapers, L.L.C.

    08/17/2016
    25 EAL (2016)

      . Justice BAER, TODD and DOUGHERTY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 95


text:
    Firmstone Oil Co., Inc. v. Rigerman; Regimen, In re

    08/23/2016
    240 MAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 189


text:
    Gelok v. Bryce

    09/06/2016
    181 MAL (2016)

      . Justice DONOHUE and MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 657


text:
    Johnstone v. Johnstone
    08/24/2016
    132 MAL (2016)
   Denied


text:
    Lei Ke v. Drexel University
    08/24/2016
    151 EAL (2016)
   Denied


text:
    Long v. Long
    08/23/2016
    148 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 195


text:
    Mangan v. Safe Auto Ins. Co.
    08/10/2016
    126 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 666


text:
    McGrath v. McGrath
    08/23/2016
    166 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 203


text:
    Mumma, In re Estate of
    08/18/2016
    823, 981, 982 MAL (2015)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 125 A.3d 1205


text:
    N.D.B., In re; A.A.B., In re

    08/31/2016
    546 MAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied


text:
    North City Development Co. v. General Foods, LLC

    08/17/2016
    52 EAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 480


text:
    Rancosky v. Washington Nat. Ins. Co.
    08/30/2016
    127 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 130 A.3d 79


text:
    Rearick v. Elderton State Bank
    08/30/2016
    74 WAL (2016)
   Denied


text:
    Sacchetti, In re Estate of

    08/30/2016
    63 EAL (2016)

      . Justice DONOHUE did not participate in the decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 128 A.3d 273


text:
    Starkey v. Segars
    08/10/2016
    131 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 198


text:
    Wakeley v. Brunner
    08/29/2016
    154 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 147 A.3d 1


text:
    Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Golphin

    08/22/2016
    356 MAL (2016)

      . Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

   Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 597


text:
    Williams v. Scott; Scott In re
    08/10/2016
    160 WAL (2016)
   Denied

No. 194 WDA 2016


text:
    Zellat v. McCulloch
    09/06/2016
    81 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Super., 136 A.3d 1038


text:
    Carmack v. W.C.A.B. (PJ Dick, Inc./Trumbull Corp.)
    08/16/2016
    144 WAL (2016)
   Denied


text:
    Com. v. Neighbor’s First Federal Credit Union Check in Amount of $76,389.27
    08/16/2016
    226 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Cmwlth., 141 A.3d 602


text:
    Crivellaro v. Williams Tp. Zoning Hearing Bd.
    08/16/2016
    183 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Cmwlth., 130 A.3d 162


text:
    Estate of Deckard v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Bd.; Malt Beverage Distributors Association v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Bd.; Duffer’s Beverage, LLC v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Bd; Mechanicsburg Distributing, Inc., 6485 Carlisle Pike Associates, L.P. v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Bd.
    08/30/2016
    651, 830, 849, 850, 851, 852, 853, 854, 855 MAL (2015), 115 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Cmwlth., 121 A.3d 1173


text:
    Drack v. Hamilton, Drack, In re
    08/23/2016
    228 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Cmwlth., 130 A.3d 162


text:
    Embreeville Redevelopment, L.P. v. Board of Supervisors of West Bradford Tp.
    08/10/2016
    234 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Cmwlth., 134 A.3d 1122


text:
    Erie Ins. Exchange ex rel. Sullivan v. Pennsylvania Ins. Dept.; Erie Indemnity Co., In re
    08/10/2016
    90 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Cmwlth., 133 A.3d 102


text:
    F. Zacherl, Inc. v. Flaherty Mechanical Contractors, LLC; West Allegheny School Dist., In re
    08/16/2016
    53-54 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Cmwlth., 131 A.3d 103


text:
    Fennell v. Goss
    08/22/2016
    221 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Cmwlth., 133 A.3d 126


text:
    Freedman v. W.C.A.B. (Starr Restuarant)
    08/31/2016
    152 EAL (2016)
   Denied


text:
    Hall v. Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation and Parole
    08/22/2016
    182 WAL (2016)
   Denied


text:
    Lang v. Com., Dept. of Transp.
    08/23/2016
    149 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Cmwlth., 135 A.3d 225


text:
    Lindemuth v. W.C.A.B. (Strishock Coal Co.)
    08/11/2016
    161 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Cmwlth., 134 A.3d 111


text:
    Ray v. Civil Service Com’n of Borough of Darby
    08/25/2016
    222-223 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Cmwlth., 131 A.3d 1012


text:
    Schatzberg v. W.C.A.B.(Bemis Co., Inc.)
    08/11/2016
    147 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Cmwlth., 136 A.3d 1081


text:
    Scrip v. Washington County Juvenile Probation; Washington County Jovenile Probation, In re
    09/06/2016
    89 WAL (2016)
   Denied


text:
    Snizaski v. Public School Employees' Retirement Bd.
    08/16/2016
    143 WAL (2016)
   Denied

No. 2124 CD 2015


text:
    Thompson v. Com.; Thompson, In re
    08/10/2016
    183 WAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Cmwlth., 134 A.3d 172


text:
    Tullytown Borough v. Armstrong.
    09/06/2016
    121 MAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Cmwlth., 129 A.3d 619


text:
    Ziemlewicz v. City of Philadelphia Bd. of License and Inspection Review
    08/30/2016
    213 EAL (2016)
   Denied

Pa.Cmwlth., 134 A.3d 171