text:
    STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. Phillip Linch SCHLOREDT, Petitioner.
    No. 96966-3
    Supreme Court of Washington.
    DATED at Olympia, Washington, June 5, 2019.
    ORDER
   ¶1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Johnson, Owens, Wiggins and Gordon McCloud, considered at its June 4, 2019, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶3 That the petition for review is denied.

For the Court /s/ Fairhurst, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE


source: Caselaw Access Project

license: Public Domain

text:
    STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. Richard J. HARDY, Petitioner.
    No. 96917-5
    Supreme Court of Washington.
    DATED at Olympia, Washington, June 5, 2019.
    ORDER
   ¶1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Madsen, Stephens, González and Yu, considered the petition for review at its June 4, 2019, Motion Calendar. The Department unanimously agreed that in light of 2018 amendments to the statutes governing legal financial obligations and this court's decision in State of Washington v. David Angel Ramirez, 191 Wn.2d 732, 426 P.3d 714 (2018), the trial court may not require an indigent defendant to pay the $ 200 criminal filing fee. In addition, RCW 43.43.7541 precludes the imposition of the DNA collection fee if the defendant's DNA has already been collected in connection with a prior conviction. The Department therefore unanimously agreed that the petition for review should be granted as to the $ 200 filing fee issue and the DNA fee. The Department also unanimously agreed that the petition for review raises no other issue that merits this court's consideration.

¶2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶3 That the petition for review is granted only on the issue of the challenge to the legal financial obligations. In light of this Court's decision in State of Washington v. David Angel Ramirez, 191 Wn.2d 732, 426 P.3d 714 (2018), and the 2018 amendment to the legal financial obligations statutes, this case is remanded to the trial court to strike the requirement to pay the $ 200 criminal filing fee and to reconsider the imposition of the requirement to pay the DNA fee.

For the Court /s/ Fairhurst, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE


text:
    STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. Steven M. SOMMER, Petitioner.
    No. 96969-8
    Supreme Court of Washington.
    DATED at Olympia, Washington, June 5, 2019.
    ORDER
   ¶1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Johnson, Owens, Wiggins and Gordon McCloud, considered at its June 4, 2019, Motion Calendar whether review of this case should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b). The petition for review raises several issues including a challenge to the trial court's imposition of legal financial obligations consisting of a criminal filing fee, DNA collection fee, and a provision for interest to accrue on the financial obligations. The Department unanimously agreed that in light of 2018 amendments to the statutes governing legal financial obligations and this court's decision in State of Washington v. David Angel Ramirez, 191 Wn.2d 732, 426 P.3d 714 (2018), the trial court may not require an indigent defendant to pay the $ 200 criminal filing fee as a legal financial obligation. In addition, RCW 43.43.7541 precludes the imposition of the DNA collection fee if the defendant's DNA has already been collected in connection with a prior conviction. Further, RCW 10.82.090(1) provides that as of June 7, 2018, no interest shall accrue on nonrestitution legal financial obligations. The Department therefore unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶3 That the petition for review is granted only as to the legal financial obligations issues. For the reasons explained above, this case is remanded to the trial court to amend the judgment and sentence to strike the requirement to pay the $ 200 criminal filing fee, reconsider the DNA collection fee to determine whether the Petitioner's DNA has already been collected, and amend the interest provisions to reflect that interest will not accrue on nonrestitution legal financial obligations after June 7, 2018.

For the Court /s/ Fairhurst, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE