author: FOX, J. —

text:
    CHRISTINA S. BUXTON, Appellant, v. JOHN F. W. LAUMAN et al.
    (No. 1.)
    In Banc,
    April 13, 1909.
    For tlie reasons stated In Buxton v. Kroeger, ante, p. 224, tlie' judgment in this case is affirmed.
    Appeal from St. Louis City City Circuit Court.— Hon. O’Neil By an, Judge. ,
    AFFIRMED.

      Rassieur, Schnurmachér & Bassieur for appellant.

      Kehr & Tittmann and Klein é Hough for respondents.
   FOX, J. —

This cause is brought to this court by-appeal on the part of the plaintiff from the judgment of the circuit court of the city of St. Louis in an ejectment proceeding finding the issues for the defendants.

It is sufficient to say of this cause that the same propositions are involved as in the case of Buxton v. Kroeger, ante, page 224. The conclusions reached in the Kroeger case must he held decisive of the case at bar, and the judgment of the circuit court should he affirmed, and it is so ordered.

Burgess, Lamm and Grmes, JJ., concur; Valliant, G. J., Gantt and Woodson, JJ., dissent.


source: Caselaw Access Project

license: Public Domain

text:
    CHRISTINA S. BUXTON, Appellant, v. JOHN F. W. LAUMAN et al.
    (No. 2.)
    In Banc,
    April 13, 1909.
    For the reasons stated in Buxton v. Kroeger, ante, p. 224, the judgment in this case is affirmed.
    Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Eon. O’Neil By an, Judge.
    AFFIRMED.

      Bassieur, Schnurmacher & Bassieur for appellant.

      Kehr & Tittmann and Klein & Hough for respondents.
   FOX, J. —

This cause is brought to this court by appeal on the part of the plaintiff from the judgment of the circuit court of the city of St. Louis in an ejectment proceeding finding the issues for the defendants.

It is sufficient to say of this canse that the same propositions are involved as in the case of Buxton v. Kroeger, ante, page 224. The conclusions reached in the Kroeger case must he held decisive of the case at bar, and the judgment of the circuit court should he affirmed, and it is so ordered.

Burgess, Lamm and Graves, JJ., concur; Valliant, G. J., Gantt and Woodson, JJ., dissent.


text:
    CHRISTINA S. BUXTON, Appellant, v. THOMAS DUNN et al.
    In Banc,
    April 13, 1909.
    For the reasons stated in Buxton v. Kroeger, ante, p. 224', the judgment in this case is affirmed.
    Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Ron. O’Neil By cm, Judge.
    AFFIRMED.

      Bassieur, Schnurmacher & Bassieur for appellant.

      Kehr é Tittmann and Klein & Rough for respondents.
   FOX, J. —

This cause is brought to this court by appeal on the part of the plaintiff from the judgment of the circuit court of the city of St. Louis in an ejectment proceeding finding the issues for the defendants.

It .is sufficient to say of this cause that the same propositions are involved as in the case of Buxton v. Kroeger, ante, page 224. The conclusions reached in the Kroeger case must he held decisive of the case at bar, and the judgment of the circuit court should he affirmed, and it is so ordered.

Burgess, Lamm and Graves, JJ., concur; Valliant, C. J., Gantt and Woodson, JJ., dissent.