text:
    ROBERTA BENEDETTO v. SILVIO BENEDETTO

      James H. Lee, in support of the petition.

      Jocelyn B. Hurwitz, in opposition.
    Decided January 19, 2000
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 55 Conn. App. 350 (AC 17575), is denied.


source: Caselaw Access Project

license: Public Domain

text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. ROY AMBROS SCOTT
    The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16240.

      Jon L. Schoenhom, in support of the petition.
    Decided January 19, 2000
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 55 Conn. App. 660 (AC 17742), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly reject the defendant’s claim that the court’s instruction regarding attempted sexual assault in the first degree was constitutionally inadequate?”

SULLIVAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    SUSAN M. MARSHALL ET AL. v. WILLIAM J. O’KEEFE ET AL.

      Max F. Brunswick, in support of the petition.

      Patricia A. Tisdall and Andrew J. O’Keefe, in opposition.
    Decided January 19, 2000
   The named plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 55 Conn. App. 801 (AC 18044), is denied.


text:
    TIMOTHY P. TAFT ET AL. v. WHEELABRATOR PUTNAM, INC., ET AL.
   The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 55 Conn. App. 359 (AC 18064), is granted, limited to the following issue:

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16241.

Sheila A. Huddleston, Joseph P. Williams and John E. Wertam, in support of the petition.

Ernest J. Cotnoir, in opposition.

Decided January 19, 2000

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the legislature’s validating act could not cure a zoning commission’s late publication of notice of its decision on a zoning application?”

SULLIVAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    TIMOTHY P. TAFT ET AL. v. WHEELABRATOR PUTNAM, INC., ET AL.
    The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16242.

      Michael A. Zizka, in support of the petition.

      Ernest J. Cotnoir, in opposition.
    Decided January 19, 2000
   The defendant zoning commission of the town of Putnam’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 55 Conn. App. 359 (AC 18064), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the legislature’s validating act could not cure a zoning commission’s late publication of notice of its decision on a zoning application?”

SULLIVAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. TERRY PORTEE

      Lauren Weisfeld, assistant public defender, in support of the petition.

      Marjorie Allen Dauster, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
    Decided January 19, 2000
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 55 Conn. App. 544 (AC 18432), is denied.

SULLIVAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    JOHN CZUJAK v. CITY OF BRIDGEPORT

      George C. Springer, Jr., in support of the petition.

      Frank A. May, in opposition.
    Decided January 19, 2000
   The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 55 Conn. App. 789 (AC 18534), is denied.

SULLIVAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. ALBERT J. GREEN

      Jeremiah Donovan, in support of the petition.
    Decided January 19, 2000
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 55 Conn. App. 706 (AC 18704), is denied.


text:
    VINCENT COLON v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

      Sandra Crowell, deputy assistant public defender, in support of the petition.

      Frederick W. Fawcett, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
    Decided January 19, 2000
   The petitioner Vincent Colon’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 55 Conn. App. 763 (AC 19004), is denied.


text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. RUN N. LEE

      Thomas Simones, in support of the petition.

      Susan C. Marks, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
    Decided January 19, 2000
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 19731) is denied.


text:
    NATIONAL WESTMINSTER BANK v. PETER J. GOULD ET AL.

      Alexander Scheirer, in support of the petition.

      Craig S. Taschner, in opposition.
    Decided January 12, 2000
   The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 55 Conn. App. 903 (AC 18842), is denied.

SULLIVAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    TOWN OF WINDHAM v. ROGER L. LECLAIR ET AL.

      Roger L. LeClair, pro se, in support of the petition.
    Decided January 12, 2000
   The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 55 Conn. App. 901 (AC 19139/AC 19140/AC 19142), is denied.

SULLIVAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. ALBERT GEBEAU

      David B. Rozwaski, special public defender, in support of the petition.
    Decided February 2, 2000
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 55 Conn. App. 795 (AC 17412), is denied.


text:
    CHRISTIE MIKOLINSKI v. COMMISSIONER OF MOTOR VEHICLES

      Jeffrey D. Brownstein, in support of the petition.
    Decided February 2, 2000
   The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 55 Conn. App. 691 (AC 17835), is denied.

KATZ, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. ROBERT C. MILLER

      Ronald G. Weller, assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition.

      Theresa M. Dalton, assistant public defender, in opposition.
    Decided February 2, 2000
   The petition of the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 55 Conn. App. 298 (AC 18158), is denied.


text:
    DONNA M. MCCARTHY v. VINCENT P. MCCARTHY

      Ann-Louise Lohr, in support of the petition.

      Jeffrey J. Holley, in opposition.
    Decided February 2, 2000
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 55 Conn. App. 326 (AC 18932), is denied.

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    SUZANNE BAUGHMAN v. PATRICK COLLINS ET AL.

      M. Jeffry Spahr, in support of the petition.

      Robert G. Golger, in opposition.
    Decided February 2, 2000
   The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 34 (AC 18496), is denied.


text:
    CONSTANTINE MORANT v. FIRST NATIONAL SUPERMARKETS, INC., ET AL.

      Constantine Morant, pro se, in support of the petition.
    Decided February 2, 2000
   The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 901 (AC 18907), is denied.


text:
    NOEL ROY, TRUSTEE, ET AL. v. JOSEPH H. BEILIN ET AL.

      Brian E. Lambeck, in support of the petition.

      Christopher K. Leonard, in opposition.
    Decided February 2, 2000
   The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 19809) is denied.

SULLIVAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    LAURELBROOK I ASSOCIATES, LLC v. BARBARA ROTH ET AL.

      Howard A. Lawrence, in support of the petition.

      Matthew B. Woods, in opposition.
    Decided February 2, 2000
   The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 19868) is denied.


text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. JOEL THERON PHILLIPS

      Richard C. Marquette, special public defender, in support of the petition.
    Decided February 2, 2000
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 19937) is denied.


text:
    THADDEUS TAYLOR v. STATE BOARD OF MEDIATION AND ARBITRATION

      Thaddeus Taylor, pro se, in support of the petition.

      Richard A. Sponzo, assistant attorney general, in opposition.
    Decided February 10, 2000
   The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 54 Conn. App. 550 (AC 17436), is denied.

KATZ and SULLIVAN, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    JOHN J. PITCHELL v. JOHN R. WILLIAMS ET AL.

      Jane E. Stoddard and Anthony Nuzzo, Jr., in support of the petition.
   The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 55 Conn. App. 571 (AC 18169), is denied.

BORDEN, PALMER and SULLIVAN, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

John C. Lewis III, in opposition.

Decided February 10, 2000


text:
    JOSEPH P. GERARDI v. DENNIS J. MITCHELL

      Joseph P. Gerardi, pro se, in support of the petition.
    Decided February 10, 2000
   The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 55 Conn. App. 901 (AC 19511), is denied.


text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. JULIO RODRIGUEZ

      Michael L. Moscowitz, special public defender, in support of the petition.

      Leon F. Dalbec, Jr., senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
    Decided February 10, 2000
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 117 (AC 17199), is denied.

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. GLEN MARTIN
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 98 (AC 17514), is denied.

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Michael L. Moscowitz, special public defender, in support of the petition.

Bruce R. Lockwood, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided February 10, 2000


text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. JAMES BROWN

      Francis L. OReilly, special public defender, in support of the petition.

      Richard F. Jacobson, supervisory assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
    Decided February 10, 2000
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 26 (AC 17606), is denied.


text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. FELIX RIVERA

      Alice M. Sexton, special public defender, in support of the petition.

      Christopher T. Godialis, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
    Decided February 10, 2000
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 182 (AC 17628), is denied.

NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    JOHN D. PAULUS ET AL. v. ANDREW LASALA, JR., ET AL.

      James R. Fogarty and Carolyn Alexander Collins, in support of the petition.

      Alan R. Spirer, in opposition.
    Decided February 10, 2000
   The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 139 (AC 18162), is denied.


text:
    RITA PATERNOSTRO v. ARBORIO CORPORATION ET AL.

      Ross T. Lessaek, in support of the petition.

      Nancy S. Rosenbaum, in opposition.
    Decided February 10, 2000
   The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 215 (AC 18851), is denied.

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    SECURITY MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK v. KINGS WEST LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ET AL.
   The petition by the receiver CB CommerciaJ/Hamp-shire, LLC, for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 44 (AC 18899), is denied.

SULLIVAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Edward T. Krumeich, in support of the petition.

Bernard Green, in opposition.

Decided February 10, 2000


text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. MARCUS GREGORY

      Norman A. Pattis, in support of the petition.

      Carolyn K. Longstreth, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
    Decided February 10, 2000
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 47 (AC 19726), is denied.

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    CONNECTICUT BANK OF COMMERCE v. JULIE D. GIORDANO ET AL.

      Roger J. Frechette, in support of the petition.

      Marjorie R. Gruszkiewicz, in opposition.
    Decided February 10, 2000
   The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 20098) is denied.

NORCOTT and SULLIVAN, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    MARIO ROSATO v. BEATRICE ROSATO
    The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16250.

      Beatrice Rosato, pro se, in support of the petition.

      James P. Caulfield, in opposition.
    Decided February 16, 2000
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 40 Conn. App. 533 (AC 14678), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court improperly reverse the judgment of the trial court due to a misreading of the trial court’s order regarding the defendant wife’s interest in the plaintiff husband’s current lifetime annuity?”

BORDEN and VERTEFEUILLE, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    TERRY ANN WILLIAMS v. COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND OPPORTUNITIES ET AL.
    The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16249.

      Philip A. Murphy, Jr., commission counsel, in support of the petition.
    Decided February 16, 2000
   The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 54 Conn. App. 251 (AC 17948), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court improperly conclude that the 180 day time limitation for filing a complaint under General Statutes § 46a-82 (e) was subject matter jurisdictional?”

KATZ and VERTEFEUILLE, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. DAVID GRENIER
    The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16248.

      Moira L. Buckley, in support of the petition.
    Decided February 16, 2000
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 55 Conn. App. 630 (AC 18211), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Whether the Appellate Court incorrectly determined that the improperly admitted expert testimony regarding the ultimate issue in the case was harmless error?”

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    SKW REAL ESTATE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v. MITSUBISHI MOTOR SALES OF AMERICA, INC.

      Allan B. Taylor, in support of the petition.

      Linda L. Morkan, in opposition.
    Decided February 16, 2000
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 1 (AC 17397), is denied.


text:
    JANE KRUPIEN v. PRYIA RAI
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 247 (AC 18305), is denied.

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Cynthia A. Watts, in support of the petition.

Decided February 16, 2000


text:
    IN RE ALISSA N.

      William A. Snider, in support of the petition.
    Decided February 16, 2000
   The petitioner-grandmother’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 203 (AC 18596), is denied.


text:
    JOHN DOE v. STATEWIDE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE

      Max F. Brunswick, in support of the petition.

      Cathy A. Dowd, assistant bar counsel, in opposition.
    Decided February 16, 2000
   The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 250 (AC 18617), is denied.

SULLIVAN and VERTEFEUILLE, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    TERRY D. GILLETTE v. TOWN OF MONROE ET AL.

      Mark J. Sommaruga and Catherine M. Thompson, in support of the petition.
   The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 235 (AC 18673), is denied.

Christopher B. Carveth, in opposition.

Decided February 16, 2000


text:
    STUART COHN v. LYNNE HALL

      James H. Lee, in support of the petition.

      Richard M. Porter, in opposition.
    Decided February 16, 2000
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 19972) is denied.

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    BENJAMIN GYADU v. PERLSTEIN AND AYARS, P.C.

      Benjamin Gyadu, pro se, in support of the petition.

      John R. Horvack, Jr., in opposition.
    Decided February 16, 2000
   The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 20051) is denied.

MCDONALD, C. J., and SULLIVAN and VERTEFEU-ILLE, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    EUGENE LIDMAN ET AL. v. LINDA NUGENT
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 55 Conn. App. 905 (AC 18996), is granted. The case is remanded to the Appellate Court for reconsideration in light of Wichers v. Hatch, 252 Conn. 174, 745 A.2d 789 (2000).

John J. Sheedy, in support of the petition.

Decided January 19, 2000

In view of our remand without further proceedings in this court, the provisions of Practice Book § 84-9 are waived.


text:
    CHARLES AMO v. ROBERT J. PINCINCE ET AL.
    The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16264.
   The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 55 Conn. App. 767 (AC 19304), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly decline to review the plaintiffs claim based on an inadequate record, where the plaintiff appealed the issue of the trial court’s jurisdiction to open a foreclosure judgment after title to the property had passed from the defendants, and the record included the judgment of foreclosure, the passing of the law days, the vesting of title in another party, the motion to open judgment being filed after title had vested, and the decision granting the motion over the plaintiffs jurisdictional argument being entered after title had vested?
“2. Whether the Appellate Court, in light of General Statutes § 49-15, properly affirmed the trial court’s order granting a motion to open a foreclosure judgment, when the motion was filed, and the decision granting it was rendered, after title to the subject property had vested in another party?”

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Thomas G. Benneche, in support of the petition.

Decided March 2, 2000


text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. SANTOS MIRANDA
    The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16271.

      Robert J. Scheinblum, assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition.

      Susan M. Cormier, in opposition.
    Decided March 2, 2000
   The petition of the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 298 (AC 14439), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Was there sufficient evidence to convict the defendant of assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-59 (a) (3), and of risk of injury to a child in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 1993) § 53-21?
“2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the assault convictions deprived the defendant of due process of law under the fourteenth amendment to the United States constitution?
“3. Do the defendant’s convictions of two counts of assault in the first degree violate the prohibition against double jeopardy under the United States constitution?
“4. Do the defendant’s convictions for assault in the first degree and risk of injury to a child violate the prohibition against double jeopardy under the United States constitution?”


text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. SANTOS MIRANDA
    The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16271x01.

      Susan M. Cormier, in support of the petition.

      Robert J. Scheinblum, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
    Decided March 2, 2000
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 298 (AC 14439), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Was there sufficient evidence to convict the defendant of assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-59 (a) (3), and risk of injury to a child in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 1993) § 53-21?
“2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the assault convictions deprived the defendant of due process of law under the fourteenth amendment to the United States constitution?
“3. Do the defendant’s convictions of two counts of assault in the first degree violate the prohibition against double jeopardy under the United States constitution?
“4. Do the defendant’s convictions for assault in the first degree and risk of injury to a child violate the prohibition against double jeopardy under the United States constitution?”


text:
    JOSEPH GRIGERIK v. GARY SHARPE

      Lorina S. Coon, in support of the petition.
   The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 314 (AC 15099), is denied.

Timothy Brignole, in opposition.

Decided March 2, 2000


text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. PAUL F. MILLER

      William F. Gallagher and Thomas J. Airone, in support of the petition.

      James M. Ralls, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
    Decided March 2, 2000
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 191 (AC 17160), is denied.

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. TODD BRANHAM

      Jayne F. Kennedy, assistant public defender, in support of the petition.

      Marjorie Allen Dauster, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
    Decided March 2, 2000
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 395 (AC 18065), is denied.


text:
    ARNOLD L. BEIZER v. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
   The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 347 (AC 18242/ 18898), is denied.

Richard F. Wareing, in support of the petition.

Thadd A. Gnocchi, assistant attorney general, in opposition.

Decided March 2, 2000


text:
    WALTER SCHEIRER v. FRENISH, INC., ET AL.

      Alexander Scheirer, in support of the petition.

      Francis P. Alvarez and Christina L. Calise, in opposition.
    Decided March 2, 2000
   The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 228 (AC 18306), is denied.


text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. ANDREA JACKSON

      Francis A. Miniter, in support of the petition.

      Leon F. Dalbec, Jr., senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
    Decided March 2, 2000
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 264 (AC 18439), is denied.


text:
    WILLIAM F. BENNETT v. CONNECTICUT HOSPICE, INC.
   The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 134 (AC 18765), is denied.

William F. Bennett, pro se, in support of the petition.

Jody Benbow, in opposition.

Decided March 2, 2000


text:
    JULIO GUTIERREZ v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

      David B. Rozwaski, special public defender, in support of the petition.

      John A. East III, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
    Decided March 2, 2000
   The petitioner Julio Gutierrez’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 904 (AC 18840), is denied.


text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. CARMI KELLMAN

      Neal Cone, assistant public defender, in support of the petition.

      John A. East III, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
    Decided March 2, 2000
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 279 (AC 19110), is denied.

NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    STATEWIDE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE v. ARTHUR O. KLEIN

      Arthur O. Klein, pro se, in support of the petition.

      Maureen A. Horgan, assistant bar counsel, in opposition.
    Decided March 2, 2000
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 903 (AC 19331), is denied.

SULLIVAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    IN RE SHAMIKA F. ET AL.
    The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16263.

      Kenneth Paul Fox, in support of the petition.

      Mary K Lenehan, assistant attorney general, in opposition.
    Decided March 2, 2000
   The respondent father’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 19460) is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Is an order of temporary custody a final judgment for purposes of appeal or must any such appeal wait until an order of termination of parental rights is entered in the matter?”

KATZ, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    NATIONAL LOAN INVESTORS L.P. v. JURI E. TAALMAN ET AL.

      Gilbert Shasha, in support of the petition.

      Frederic S. Ury, in opposition.
    Decided March 2, 2000
   The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 20270) is denied.

SULLIVAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. HAROLD TRENT BUTLER
    The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16274.

      Mitchell S. Brody, assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition.

      Avery S. Chapman, special public defender, in opposition.
    Decided February 10, 2000
   The petition of the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 55 Conn. App. 502 (AC 17753), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that a due process violation resulted from prosecutorial misconduct during closing argument?”


text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. CURTIS HERRING
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 55 Conn. App. 522 (AC 17360), is denied.

David B. Rozwaski, special public defender, in support of the petition.

Bruce R. Lockwood, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided February 10, 2000

SULLIVAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. JOHN CASIANO

      James B. Streeto, deputy assistant public defender, in support of the petition.

      Mitchell S. Brody, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
    Decided February 10, 2000
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 55 Conn. App. 582 (AC 18645), is denied.

SULLIVAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    FLORENCE CUSANO, EXECUTRIX (ESTATE OF RICHARD CUSANO) v. BURGUNDY CHEVROLET, INC., ET AL.

      Daniel P. Scapellati, Paul D. Meade and Lawrence L. Connelli, in support of the petition.
   The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 55 Conn. App. 655 (AC 18212), is denied.

SULLIVAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Michael J. Walsh, in opposition.

Decided February 10, 2000


text:
    MAURICE NIZZARDO v. STATE TRAFFIC COMMISSION ET AL.
    The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16239.

      Steven R. Smart, in support of the petition.

      Karen K Clark, in opposition.
    Decided February 10, 2000
   The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 55 Conn. App. 679 (AC 18417), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiffs appeal from the denial of his intervenor status before the defendant state traffic commission was untimely?
“2. Did the plaintiff have standing to raise environmental issues before the defendant state traffic commission?”

SULLIVAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    KAREN LOMBARDI v. JOHN LOMBARDI
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 55 Conn. App. 117 (AC 18607), is denied.

SULLIVAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Vito A. Castignoli, in support of the petition.

Decided February 10, 2000


text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. JOHN BRONSON, SR.
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 55 Conn. App. 717 (AC 16833), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court properly denied the defendant’s motion for a continuance to prepare for the midtrial State v. Jarzbek, 204 Conn. 683, 529 A.2d 1245 (1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1061, 108 S. Ct. 1017, 98 L. Ed. 2d 982 (1988), hearing?
“2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court properly denied the defendant’s motion for an examination of the victim by a court-appointed expert?
“3. Did the Appellate Court properly affirm the denial by the trial court of the defendant’s motion for a mistrial?
“4. Did the Appellate Court properly affirm the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s motion to redact portions of the pretrial videotape of the interview of the victim?
“5. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the record was inadequate to review the defendant’s claims that the trial court violated the defendant’s rights under Practice Book § 743, now § 40-13, or article first, § 8, of the state constitution, by precluding his six character witnesses? If the foregoing record was adequate, did the trial court violate any such rights of the defendant?”

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16273.

Susan M. Hankins, assistant public defender, in support of the petition.

Toni M. Smith-Rosario, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided March 8, 2000

KATZ and VERTEFEUILLE, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. LOUIS REED

      Susan M. Hankins, assistant public defender, in support of the petition.

      Nancy L. Chupak, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
    Decided March 8, 2000
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 428 (AC 17678), is denied.

KATZ and VERTEFEUILLE, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    IN RE KASHEEMA L. ET AL.

      Mary Ann Barile, in support of the petition.
   The respondent mother’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 484 (AC 17767), is denied.

NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Jane R. Rosenberg, assistant attorney general, in opposition.

Decided March 8, 2000


text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. JON A. BARAN

      Jon A. Baran, pro se, in support of the petition.

      Leon F. Dalbec, Jr., senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
    Decided March 8, 2000
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 904 (AC 19009), is denied.


text:
    HERMA STRIBULA v. JOZEF KUBACKA ET AL.

      James D. Hirschfield, in support of the petition.

      John F. Lambert, in opposition.
    Decided March 8, 2000
   The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 906 (AC 19306), is denied.

SULLIVAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. MICHAEL E. ROBICHAUD, JR.
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 907 (AC 18679), is denied.

Del Atwell, special public defender, in support of the petition.

Joy K. Fausey, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided March 8, 2000

MCDONALD, C. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. KYLE BAINES

      Lauren Weisfeld, assistant public defender, in support of the petition.

      Bruce R. Lockwood, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
    Decided March 8, 2000
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 443 (AC 19457), is denied.

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. JAMAL JENKINS

      Kenneth Rosenthal, special public defender, in support of the petition.
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 450 (AC 19458), is denied.

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Bruce R. Lockwood, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided March 8, 2000


text:
    BENJAMIN GYADU v. A.P.L. AUTO CONSULTING, INC.

      Benjamin Gyadu, pro se, in support of the petition.
    Decided March 8, 2000
   The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 19969) is dismissed.

MCDONALD, C. J., and SULLIVAN and VERTEFEU-ILLE, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    EMPIRE MORTGAGE LTD. v. BENJAMIN GYADU

      Benjamin Gyadu, pro se, in support of the petition.
    Decided March 8, 2000
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court is dismissed.

MCDONALD, C. J., and SULLIVAN and VERTEFEU-ILLE, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    JOYCE SENIOR v. DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES
   The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 907 (AC 19153), is denied.


text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. JANCIS L. FULLER

      Jancis L. Fuller, pro se, in support of the petition.

      Michael L. Regan, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
    Decided March 22, 2000
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 592 (AC 17328), is denied.

MCDONALD, C. J., and PALMER and SULLIVAN, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. CHRISTIE MIKOLINSKI
    The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16275.

      Jeffrey D. Brownstein, in support of the petition.

      Eileen McCarthy Geel, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
    Decided March 22, 2000
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 252 (AC 17866), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant’s detention at a roadside sobriety checkpoint did not violate her rights under either article first, § 7, or article first, § 9, of the Connecticut constitution?”

SULLIVAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    KAREN ECKERT ET AL. v. FORT RACHEL MARINE SERVICES, INC.

      Neil Johnson, in support of the petition.
    Decided March 22, 2000
   The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 908 (AC 18277), is denied.


text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. ANTHONY BROCUGLIO

      James M. Ralls, assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition.

      Pamela S. Nagy, assistant public defender, in opposition.
    Decided March 22, 2000
   The petition of the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 514 (AC 18521), is denied.

SULLIVAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    RICHARD SZCZAPA v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.

      Neil Johnson, in support of the petition.

      James J. Merrick, in opposition.
    Decided March 22, 2000
   The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 325 (AC 18541), is denied.


text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. SOEUN KIM PIN

      Judith M. Wildfeuer, deputy assistant public defender, in support of the petition.

      Mitchell S. Brody, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
    Decided March 22, 2000
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 549 (AC 18644), is denied.


text:
    IN RE FELICIA B. ET AL.

      Michael J. Melly, in support of the petition.

      Maureen D. Regula, assistant attorney general, in opposition.
    Decided March 22, 2000
   The intervenors petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 525 (AC 19122), is denied.


text:
    ROBERT CARBONE v. LINDSAY THOMSON

      Steven L. Seligman, in support of the petition.

      Thomas P. Chapman, in opposition.
    Decided March 22, 2000
   The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 909 (AC 19166), is denied.

PALMER, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. LAMAR DUPREE

      Louis S. Avitabile, special public defender, in support of the petition.

      Toni M. Smith-Rosario, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
    Decided April 13, 2000
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 631 (AC 17583), is denied.


text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. JAROSLAW NANOWSKI

      John T. Walkley, special public defender, in support of the petition.

      Denise B. Smoker, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
    Decided April 13, 2000
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 649 (AC 17647), is denied.

NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. MATTHEW MARKEVEYS

      Theresa M. Dalton, senior assistant public defender, in support of the petition.
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 716 (AC 17795), is denied.

Eileen McCarthy Geel, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided April 13, 2000


text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. ORIEN THOMAS

      Lisa A. Riggione, senior assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition.

      Eugene P. Falco, special public defender, in opposition.
    Decided April 13, 2000
   The petition of the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 573 (AC 18512), is denied.


text:
    BENJAMIN ANCONA v. MANAFORT BROTHERS, INC.

      Tara K. Lyons and Vincent F. Sabatini, in support of the petition.

      Kenneth R. Slater, Jr., in opposition.
    Decided April 13, 2000
   The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 701 (AC 18372), is denied.


text:
    JAMES C. BERNET ET AL. v. JOHN R. BERNET ET AL.
   The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 661 (AC 18408), is denied.

William F. Gallagher, in support of the petition.

William M. Bloss, in opposition.

Decided April 13, 2000

SULLIVAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. LEO CHARLES

      Del Atwell, special public defender, in support of the petition.

      LeonF. Dalbec, Jr., assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
    Decided April 13, 2000
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 722 (AC 18529), is denied.

NORCOTT and VERTEFEUILLE, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    ROBERT BRIAN CRIM v. YALE UNIVERSITY ET AL.

      Robert Brian Grim, pro se, in support of the petition.

      Michael J. Boyle, in opposition, which was adopted by Patrick M. Noonan and Kevin C. Shea.

    Decided April 13, 2000
   The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 908 (AC 18877), is denied.

MCDONALD, C. J., and NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.