text:
    Dorothy M. Baker v. David P. Cordisco
    Decided June 13, 1995

      Laurence V. Parnoff, in support of the petition.

      Michael S. Lynch, in opposition.
   The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 37 Conn. App. 515 (AC 12612), is denied.


source: Caselaw Access Project

license: Public Domain

text:
    Margaret Sirot, Executrix (Estate of Marvin Sirot) v. J. William Burns, Commissioner of Transportation
    Decided June 13, 1995

      David S. Golub and Jonathan M. Levine, in support of the petition.

      Paul E. Pollock, in opposition.
   The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 37 Conn. App. 551 (AC 12410), is denied.


text:
    Diana Moxon v. Board of Trustees of Regional Community Colleges
    Decided June 13, 1995

      Robert F. Carter, in support of the petition.

      Loida John-Nicholson, assistant attorney general, in opposition.
   The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 37 Conn. App. 648 (AC 13515), is denied.


text:
    Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Stephen C. Bombero
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 37 Conn. App. 764 (AC 12074), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“In the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court properly affirm the discharge of the lien of a judgment lienholder who had mistakenly been omitted from foreclosure proceedings?”

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15285.

Decided June 13, 1995

Robert C. Pinciaro, in support of the petition.

Alexander H. Schwartz and Monte E. Frank, in opposition.


text:
    Loretta Ball v. Larry L. Ball
    Decided June 13, 1995

      Tony Ghecas, in support of the petition.
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 37 Conn. App. 908 (AC 13161), is denied.


text:
    Chase Manhattan Bank v. William H. Gilbert et al.
    Decided June 13, 1995

      Dorothy Lerner, in support of the petition.
   The defendant Dorothy Lerner’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 37 Conn. App. 910 (AC 13467), is denied.


text:
    Stephen Ceslik v. Lauren Winer
    Decided June 13, 1995

      Stephen Ceslik, pro se, in support of the petition.
   The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 37 Conn. App. 919 (AC 12317), is denied.


text:
    Burritt Interfinancial Bancorporation v. Elio Capuano et al.
    Decided June 13, 1995

      Dale H. King, in support of the petition.

      Glory Martin Lena and William S. Fish, Jr., in opposition.
   The defendants Elio Capuano and Paul Capuano’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 37 Conn. App. 924 (AC 12871), is denied.


text:
    Candlewood Shores Estates v. Barry Klein et al.
    Decided June 19, 1995

      James A. Curran, in support of the petition.

      Andre L. Nagy, in opposition.
   The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court is dismissed.


text:
    State of Connecticut v. Troy Mozell
    Decided June 19, 1995

      Gerald E. Bodell, public defender, in support of the petition.

      Ronald G. Weller, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 37 Conn. App. 574 (AC 13828), is denied.


text:
    State of Connecticut v. Luis Colon
    Decided June 19, 1995

      Neal Cone, assistant public defender, in support of the petition.

      Mary Elizabeth Baran, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 37 Conn. App. 635 (AC 13022), is denied.


text:
    Town of Fairfield et al. v. Connecticut Siting Council et al.
    The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15287.
    Decided June 19, 1995

      Anthony M. Fitzgerald, in support of the petition.

      Linda M. Guliuzza, in opposition.
   The petition of the defendants Connecticut Light and Power Company and United Illuminating Company for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 37 Conn. App. 653 (AC 13094), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Under the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the decision of the Connecticut Siting Council was a final decision in a contested case under the Uniform Administrative Procedure Act?”


text:
    Town of Fairfield et al. v. Connecticut Siting Council et al.
   The petition of the defendant Connecticut Siting Council for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 37 Conn. App. 653 (AC 13094), is granted, limited to the following issue:

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15286.

Decided June 19, 1995

Mark F. Kohler, in support of the petition.

Linda M. Guliuzza, in opposition.

“Under the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the decision of the Connecticut Siting Council was a final decision in a contested case under the Uniform Administrative Procedure Act?”


text:
    William T. Evans v. Commissioner of Correction
    Decided June 19, 1995

      Paula Mangini Montonye, assistant public defender, in support of the petition.

      Lawrence Tytla, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
   The petitioner William T. Evans’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 37 Conn. App. 672 (AC 12887), is denied.


text:
    State of Connecticut v. Mitchell Henderson
    Decided June 19, 1995

      James P. Ray, special public defender, and Craig A. Raabe, special public defender, in support of the petition.

      Mary H. Lesser, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 37 Conn. App. 733 (AC 13264), is denied.


text:
    State of Connecticut v. Michael Ricketts
    Decided June 19, 1995

      Richard Emanuel, assistant public defender, in support of the petition.

      Mitchell S. Brody, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 37 Conn. App. 749 (AC 13178), is denied.


text:
    Anthony G. Apicella et al. v. Connecticut Attorneys Title Insurance Company
    Decided June 19, 1995

      Douglas J. Apicella, in support of the petition.

      Paul T. Edwards and Craig A. Fontaine, in opposition.
   The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 37 Conn. App. 935 (AC 13505), is denied.


author: Berdon, J.,

text:
    Concerned Citizens of Willington et al. v. Department of Environmental Protection et al.
   The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 14423) is denied.

Berdon, J.,

dissenting. I disagree and would grant certification to appeal on the following issue: “Did the Appellate Court improperly dismiss as moot this appeal from the issuance of certain environmental permits when (1) the mootness claim was based solely on the defendant developer’s destruction, while the appeal was pending, of the natural resources the plaintiffs had sought to protect, (2) there was no evidence to allow the court to conclude that the damage could not be rectified, and (3) the dismissal denied the plaintiffs any opportunity for relief?”

Decided June 26, 1995

Michael A. Zizka, in support of the petition.

David B. Losee, in opposition.


text:
    State of Connecticut v. Pearlie Alford
    Decided June 26, 1995

      William Holden, public defender, in support of the petition.

      Donald A. Browne, state’s attorney, in opposition.
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 37 Conn. App. 180 (AC 11826), is denied.


text:
    State of Connecticut v. William Patterson
    The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15289.
    Decided June 26, 1995

      James M. Ralls, assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition.
   The state of Connecticut’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 37 Conn. App. 801 (AC 10752/10855), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Whether criminal defendants have a federal constitutional right to a presentence investigation report at sentencing.

“2. Whether the defendant waived any right to a presentence investigation report.

“3. Whether the defendant suffered harm from the lack of a presentence investigation report.”


text:
    State of Connecticut v. Lloyd E. Webb
    Decided June 26, 1995

      Susan M. Hankins, assistant public defender, in support of the petition.

      Carolyn K. Longstreth, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 37 Conn. App. 722 (AC 12946), is denied.


text:
    National Associated Properties v. Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of North Branford
    Decided June 26, 1995

      John M. Gesmonde, in support of the petition.

      Roy H. Scharf in opposition.
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 37 Conn. App. 788 (AC 13367), is denied.


text:
    Iraida Feliciano v. Juan Feliciano
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 37 Conn. App. 856 (AC 12933), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“ 1. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the trial court abused its discretion by deviating from the child support guidelines by limiting the support for the child to the pro rata share of the AFDC grant applicable to the child?

“2. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the trial court incorrectly held that entry of a child support order in accordance with the child support guidelines would have violated the defendant’s constitutional rights by applying his payments to the state as reimbursement for AFDC payments for two children whom he had no duty to support?”

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15295.

Decided July 10, 1995

Margaret P. Levy, in support of the petition.


text:
    Steven P. Milner v. Heidi Milner
    Decided July 10, 1995

      Steven P. Milner, pro se, in support of the petition.
   The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court is dismissed.


text:
    State of Connecticut v. Francisco Rodriguez
    Decided July 10, 1995

      John R. Williams, in support of the petition.

      Richard F. Jacobson, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 37 Conn. App. 589 (AC 11449), is denied.


text:
    State of Connecticut v. Marvie Brye
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 37 Conn. App. 914 (AC 13254), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Was the Appellate Court correct in holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in failing to order a new trial when during jury deliberations several jurors made allegedly improper remarks about the defendant who is African-American?”

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15296.

Decided July 10, 1995

Richard M. Maraño, special public defender, in support of the petition.

Leah Hawley, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.


text:
    State of Connecticut v. Jose Luis Garcia
    Decided July 10, 1995

      Brian J. Kornbrath, in support of the petition.

      Richard F. Jacobson, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 37 Conn. App. 619 (AC 11805), is denied.


text:
    Samuel Richards et al. v. Elijah James et al.
    Decided July 10, 1995

      Louis S. Avitabile, in support of the petition.
   The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 37 Conn. App. 923 (AC 13682), is denied.


text:
    Gary Zaleta v. Town of Fairfield
   The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 38 Conn. App. 1 (AC 13419), is denied.

Decided July 10, 1995

Vincent M. Zanella, Jr., and George W. Booth, Jr., in support of the petition.

Donat C. Collimore, in opposition.


text:
    State of Connecticut v. Charles J. Burns
    The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15294.
    Decided July 10, 1995

      James A. Kitten, assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition.
   The state of Connecticut’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 38 Conn. App. 8 (AC 13681), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Under General Statutes § 14-227a (h) (3), is the five year period measured from the date of the prior conviction to the date of the current conviction, or from the date of the prior conviction to the date of the current violation?”


text:
    State of Connecticut v. James H. Sewell
    Decided July 10, 1995

      James J. Ruane, in support of the petition.

      Leon F. Datbec, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 38 Conn. App. 20 (AC 12199), is denied.


text:
    Joseph L. Lynch et al. v. Granby Holdings, Inc., et al. Granby Holdings, Inc., et al. v. Daniel L. Lynch
    The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15298.
    Decided July 17, 1995

      Andrea Hewitt, in support of the petition.

      Timothy Brignole, in opposition.

       Superseded. See 235 Conn. 941 (1996).

   The petition of Granby Holdings, Inc., for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 37 Conn. App. 846 (AC 11222), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Under the circumstances of this case, was the question of the burden of proof on the issue of mitigation of damages properly raised by the plaintiff Daniel Lynch in the trial court?

“2. Should this court reconsider the holding of Pietrorazio v. Santopietro, 185 Conn. 510 (1981), that the failure to raise a claim in a motion to set aside a verdict limits this court to plain error review of that claim?

“3. Under the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court employ the plain error doctrine to review on appeal the plaintiffs claim regarding the issue of the burden of proof on mitigation of damages?

“4. If the answer to 3. is yes, did the Appellate Court act properly in doing so?”


text:
    Gilbert Frempong v. U-Haul Company of Connecticut
    Decided July 17, 1995

      Gilbert Frempong, pro se, in support of the petition.
   The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 37 Conn. App. 922 (AC 13451), is denied.


text:
    State of Connecticut v. Marc Youdin
    Decided July 17, 1995

      Alice M. Gray, in support of the petition.

      John A. East III, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 38 Conn. App. 85 (AC 13262), is denied.


text:
    Michael Walker v. Commissioner of Correction
    Decided July 17, 1995

      Paula Mangini Montonye, assistant public defender, in support of the petition.

      John A. East III, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
   The petitioner Michael Walker’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 38 Conn. App. 99 (AC 13499), is denied.

Berdon, J.,

dissenting. I would grant certification.


text:
    State of Connecticut v. Rick Manini
    Decided July 17, 1995

      Marjorie Allen Dauster, assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition.

      Sheila A. Huddleston, special public defender, in opposition.
   The state of Connecticut’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 38 Conn. App. 100 (AC 12171), is denied.


text:
    Marianne Risser v. Burton Risser
    Decided July 17, 1995

      Marianne Risser, pro se, in support of the petition.
   The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 37 Conn. App. 926 (AC 12640), is denied.


text:
    Joyce Stewart v. Middlesex Insurance Company
    Decided July 17, 1995

      Robert G. Golger, in support of the petition.
   The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 38 Conn. App. 194 (AC 12968), is denied.


text:
    State of Connecticut v. Aaron Sloan
    Decided July 17, 1995

      Barry A. Butler, assistant public defender, in support of the petition.

      Richard F. Jacobson, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 38 Conn. App. 908 (AC 11906), is denied.


text:
    Town of Thomaston v. Edward F. Gebelein, Jr.
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 38 Conn. App. 903 (AC 13106), is denied.

Decided July 17, 1995

Edward F. Gebelein, Jr., pro se, in support of the petition.

Michael D. Rybak, in opposition.