text:
    NEW HAVEN PLAZA ASSOCIATES ET AL. v. CITY OF NEW HAVEN ET AL.

      Jonathan J. Einhom, in support of the petition.
    Decided May 30, 2001
   The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 62 Conn. App. 908 (AC 20417), is denied.


source: Caselaw Access Project

license: Public Domain

text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. WILMANN JEUDIS

      James M. Fox, special public defender, in support of the petition.

      Paul J. Narducci, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
    Decided May 30, 2001
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 62 Conn. App. 787 (AC 20621), is denied.

NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. DARRYL BELTON

      Thomas M. Conroy, in support of the petition.

      Toni M. Smith-Rosario, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
    Decided May 30, 2001
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 62 Conn. App. 698 (AC 20656), is denied.

VERTEFEUILLE and ZARELLA, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. ANGEL TORO

      William B. Westeott, special public defender, in support of the petition.
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 62 Conn. App. 635 (AC 20726), is denied.

James M. Ralls, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided May 30, 2001


text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. GEORGETTE TRELA

      Mark Diamond, special public defender, in support of the petition.

      Mitchell S. Brody, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
    Decided May 30, 2001
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 62 Conn. App. 907 (AC 21042), is denied.


text:
    TRUSTEES, SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT STATE UNIVERSITY, ET AL. v. MORIN BROTHERS AUCTION SERVICES CORPORATION

      Frederick M. Morin, in support of the petition.

      Robert Snook and Laurann Asklof assistant attorneys general, in opposition.
    Decided May 30, 2001
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 21400) is denied.


text:
    CHARLES D. GIANETTI v. GEORGE HOLMES, JR., ET AL.
   The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 21556) is denied.

Charles D. Gianetti, pro se, in support of the petition.

Andrew W. Skolnick, in opposition.

Decided May 30, 2001


text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. TYSON HUNTER

      Alexander H. Schwartz, special public defender, in support of the petition.

      Timothy J. Sugrue, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
    Decided June 7, 2001
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 62 Conn. App. 767 (AC 19570), is denied.

VERTEFEUILLE and ZARELLA, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    THEODORE N. LENCZYK v. CLIFFORD GRABOWSKI

      Max F. Brunswick, in support of the petition.

      Matthew B. Witt, in opposition.
    Decided June 7, 2001
   The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 62 Conn. App. 902 (AC 20290), is denied.

ZARELLA, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. EXEL RIVERA
    The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16534.

      Felix Esposito, special public defender, in support of the petition.

      Susann E. Gill, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
    Decided June 7, 2001
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 63 Conn. App. 319 (AC 19826), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court properly granted the state of Connecticut’s motion to consolidate the two cases against the defendant?”


text:
    SUSAN DAVIES v. GENERAL TOURS, INC.

    The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16535.

      Ian Angus Cole, in support of the petition.

      Julie A. Harris, in opposition.
    Decided June 7, 2001

       The appeal was withdrawn October 18, 2001.

   The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 63 Conn. App. 17 (AC 20028), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that no genuine issue of material fact existed as to whether the defendant’s assertions about its relationship with Recep Tours estopped the defendant from denying a partnership with Recep Tours?”


text:
    FRANK W. BUGRYN, JR., ET AL. v. CITY OF BRISTOL ET AL. CITY OF BRISTOL v. FRANK W. BUGRYN, JR., ET AL. CITY OF BRISTOL v. FRANK W. BUGRYN, JR.

      Bridget C. Gallagher, in support of the petition.

      Brian T. Henebry, in opposition.
    Decided June 7, 2001
   The petition for certification by Frank W. Bugryn, Jr., John Bugryn, Nellie Fillipetti, Michael Dudko and Mary Dudko, for appeal from the Appellate Court, 63 Conn. App. 98 (AC 20511), is denied.

SULLIVAN, C. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    CONNECTICUT RESOURCES RECOVERY AUTHORITY ET AL. v. FREEDOM OF INFORMATION COMMISSION ET AL.

      Ethan Book, Jr., pro se, in support of the petition.
    Decided June 14, 2001
   The defendant Ethan Book, Jr.’s, petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 60 Conn. App. 911 (AC 19437), is dismissed.

KATZ, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. CHARLES GREEN
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 62 Conn. App. 217 (AC 18369), is granted, limited to the following issues:

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16544.

KentDrager, senior assistant public defender, in support of the petition.

Denise B. Smoker, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided June 14, 2001

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court’s instruction, limiting the jury’s use of the evidence regarding the effect of Leroy Townsend’s use of marijuana on his credibility, was proper?

“2. If the answer to question one is ‘no,’ was the error harmless?”

NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. CHARLES GREEN
    The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16544X01.

      Denise B. Smoker, assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition.
   The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 62 Conn. App. 217 (AC 18369), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that there was insufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict of guilty on the charge of conspiracy to commit murder?”

NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Kent Drager, senior assistant public defender, in opposition.

Decided June 14, 2001


text:
    MICHAEL GILLUM, ADMINISTRATOR (ESTATE OF HARUNA GILLUM), ET AL. v. YALE UNIVERSITY ET AL.

      William F. Gallagher, in support of the petition.

      Jeffrey R. Bobbin and Kevin E. Majewski and Daniel P. Seapellati, in opposition.
    Decided June 14, 2001
   The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 62 Conn. App. 775 (AC 19546), is denied.

NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    MILVIA DIBRINO v. JOSEPH FERRUCCI ET AL.

      Max F. Brunswick, in support of the petition.
    Decided June 14, 2001
   The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 62 Conn. App. 902 (AC 20053), is denied.


text:
    JAMES HUDAK v. THE S. CARPENTER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ET AL.
   The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 62 Conn. App. 902 (AC 20355), is denied.

Herbert Watstein, in support of the petition.

Decided June 14, 2001


text:
    ANTHONY DALEY v. WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY

      Jacques J. Parenteau, in support of the petition.

      Felix J. Springer and Kenneth W. Gage, in opposition.
    Decided June 14, 2001
   The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 63 Conn. App. 119 (AC 18983), is denied.


text:
    CLAUDIA WALTER ET AL. v. STATE OF CONNECTICUT, SERVICES FOR THE BLIND

      Brian W. Prucker, in support of the petition.

      Philip M. Schulz, assistant attorney general, in opposition.
    Decided June 14, 2001
   The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 63 Conn. App. 1 (AC 19754), is denied.


text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. KEVIN LUCAS
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 63 Conn. App. 263 (AC 19867), is denied.

Felix Esposito, special public defender, in support of the petition.

Timothy J. Sugrue, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided June 14, 2001

NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    HAROLD J. DAW ET AL. v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE TOWN OF WESTPORT ET AL.

      Robert A. Fuller, in support of the petition.

      Thomas M. Geisler, Jr., in opposition.
    Decided June 14, 2001
   The defendant Totney Benson’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 63 Conn. App. 176 (AC 20334), is denied.


text:
    LAWRENCE PUCHALSKY v. THEODORE RAPPAHAHN ET AL.

      Robert M. Fitzgerald, in support of the petition.

      Nancy S. Rosenbaum, in opposition.
    Decided June 14, 2001
   The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 63 Conn. App. 72 (AC 20538), is denied.


text:
    BENJAMIN GYADU v. G & W MANAGEMENT, INC.

      Benjamin Gyadu, pro se, in support of the petition.
    Decided June 14, 2001
   The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 19756) is dismissed.

SULLIVAN, C. J., and VERTEFEUILLE andZARELLA, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    IN RE ESSEX COUNTY OF MASSACHUSETTS CIVIL ACTION 99D-0060-DV1

      David A. Curry, in support of the petition.
    Decided June 14, 2001
   The petition for certification by the plaintiffs, Allyn Seymour and Frances Waterman Seymour, for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 21687) is denied.

BORDEN and ZARELLA, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    RICHARD N. CAFRO ET AL. v. LAWRENCE P. BROPHY ET AL.

      Matthew J. Collins, in support of the petition.

      Hugh F. Keefe, in opposition.
    Decided June 19, 2001
   The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 62 Conn. App. 113 (AC 18478), is denied.

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    RICHARD N. CAFRO ET AL. v. LAWRENCE P. BROPHY ET AL.

      Hugh F. Keefe, in support of the cross petition.
    Decided June 19, 2001
   The defendants’ cross petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 62 Conn. App. 113 (AC 18478), is denied.

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. ANDREW OWENS

      Del Atwell, special public defender, in support of the petition.

      Marjorie Allen Daus ter, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
    Decided June 19, 2001
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 63 Conn. App. 245 (AC 18013), is denied.


text:
    ERNEST FRANCIS v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

      Damon A. R. Kirschbaum, special public defender, in support of the petition.
   The petitioner Ernest Francis’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 63 Conn. App. 282 (AC 18926), is denied.

Margaret Gaffney Radionovas, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided June 19, 2001


text:
    KATHLEEN T. FAUGHT v. EDGEWOOD CORNERS, INC.

      William F. Gallagher, in support of the petition.

      John J. Resnik, in opposition.
    Decided June 19, 2001
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 63 Conn. App. 164 (AC 19629), is denied.

VERTEFEUILLE and ZARELLA, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. BENNIE GENE GRAY, JR.

      Matthew T. Gilbride, special public defender, in support of the petition.

      Michael L. Regan, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
    Decided June 19, 2001
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 63 Conn. App. 151 (AC 19862/AC 19889), is denied.

ZARELLA, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. RAYMOND APONTE
    The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16546.

      Donald D. Dakers, special public defender, in support of the petition.

      Frederick W. Fawcett, supervisory assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
    Decided June 19, 2001
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 63 Conn. App. 82 (AC 20234), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court’s jury instruction regarding the specific intent necessary for a charge of conspiracy to commit murder was constitutionally sufficient?

“2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court’s instruction regarding the use of a deadly weapon on the vital part of another was constitutionally sufficient?”

ZARELLA, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    RUPERTO VINCENTE v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

      Del Atwell, special public defender, in support of the petition.
   The petitioner Ruperto Vincente’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 63 Conn. App. 902 (AC 20318), is denied.

Christopher T. Godialis, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided June 19, 2001


text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. EDGAR RODRIGUEZ

      Suzanne Zitser, assistant public defender, in support of the petition.

      Richard F. Jacobson, special assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
    Decided June 19, 2001
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 63 Conn. App. 529 (AC 20827), is denied.

NORCOTT and KATZ, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    ANIMAL RIGHTS FRONT v. ARTHUR J. ROCQUE, JR., COMMISSIONER OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

      Derek V. Oatis, in support of the petition.

      Eliot D. Prescott, assistant attorney general, in opposition.
    Decided June 19, 2001
   The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 63 Conn. App. 207 (AC 20924), is denied.

KATZ, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.