text:
    WILLIAM EVANS v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

      James A. Shanley, Jr., special public defender, in support of the petition.

      Lawrence J. Tytla, senior assistant state’s attorney in opposition.
    Decided April 8, 1998
   The petitioner William Evans’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 47 Conn. App. 773 (AC 16778), is denied.


source: Caselaw Access Project

license: Public Domain

text:
    THEODORE LENCZYK v. CONNECTICUT DENTAL COMMISSION ET AL.

      Max F. Brunswick, in support of the petition.
    Decided April 8, 1998
   The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 47 Conn. App. 936 (AC 16815), is denied.

MCDONALD, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    HELEN D. LEGNOS v. PETER J. LEGNOS

      Peter J. Legnos, pro se, in support of the petition.
    Decided April 8, 1998
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 47 Conn. App. 927 (AC 16837), is denied.


text:
    FREDERICK CURRIER v. PATRICK CURRIER

      Ian A. Cole, in support of the petition.

      Jeffrey D. Ginzberg, in opposition.
    Decided April 8, 1998
   The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 47 Conn. App. 940 (AC 17148), is denied.


text:
    MIDSTATES RESOURCES CORPORATION v. REX K. COLLUM ET AL.

      John R. Williams, in support of the petition.

      Thomas J. Sansone, in opposition.
    Decided April 8, 1998
   The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 47 Conn. App. 936 (AC 17448), is denied.

MCDONALD, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION v. JON A. BARAN

      Jon A. Baran, pro se, in support of the petition.
    Decided April 8, 1998
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 17659) is denied.


text:
    ROSAMARIA BONAMICO ET AL. v. CITY OF MIDDLETOWN ET AL.

      Averum J. Sprecher, in support of the petition.

      Andrew J. O’Keefe and Joseph M. Busher, in opposition.
    Decided April 15, 1998
   The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 47 Conn. App. 758 (AC 16562), is granted. The case is remanded to the Appellate Court for reconsideration in light of Purzycki v. Fairfield, 244 Conn. 191 (1998).

In view of our remand without further proceedings in this court, the provisions of Practice Book (1998 Rev.) § 84-9 (formerly § 4138) are waived.

MCDONALD, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    JERRY DALMASO v. DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES
   The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 47 Conn. App. 839 (AC 16660), is granted, limited to the following issue:

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15911.

Mark M. Wrenn, in support of the petition.

Robert L. Marconi, assistant attorney general, in opposition.

Decided April 15, 1998

“Under the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiff refused to take the blood alcohol test within the meaning of General Statutes § 14-227b (f) (3)?”


text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. MARLIK MOURNING
    The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15913.

      Nancy Burton, in support of the petition.

      Robert C. Brunetti, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
    Decided April 15, 1998
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 47 Conn. App. 916 (AC 16679), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Under the circumstances of this case, did the trial court abuse its discretion by revoking the defendant’s probation of a conviction as a youthful offender and by sentencing the defendant to imprisonment?”


text:
    NORWICH SAVINGS SOCIETY v. GEORGE R. FLONNES ET AL.

      George R. Flonnes, pro se, in support of the petition.
    Decided April 15, 1998
   The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 47 Conn. App. 922 (AC 16944), is denied.


text:
    EILEEN DEMARIA v. JOSEPH L. DEMARIA
    The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15912.

      David P. Ball, in support of the petition.
    Decided April 15, 1998
   The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 47 Conn. App. 729 (AC 17025), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Under the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court properly render a judgment terminating alimony to a cohabiting spouse where there was no showing that the cohabiting spouse’s financial needs had changed?”


text:
    MARK RICHARD v. OLSEN TEMPORARY SERVICES ET AL.

      James K. Smith, in support of the petition.
    Decided April 15, 1998
   The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 47 Conn. App. 939 (AC 17271), is denied.


text:
    ALAN SOLOMON ET AL. v. WILLIAM C. GILMORE ET AL.
   The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 80 (AC 16087), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that a mortgage loan issued by a lender in violation of General Statutes § 36a-511 is enforceable in a foreclosure action?”

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15914.

Lori Welch-Rubin, in support of the petition.

Decided April 15, 1998


text:
    DAVID DUBINSKY v. CITICORP MORTGAGE, INC.

      Kerry M. Wisser and Nathan A. Schatz, in support of the petition.

      Matthew D. Gordon, in opposition.
    Decided April 15, 1998
   The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 52 (AC 16790), is denied.


text:
    LINDA A. MASI v. FRANCIS E. MASI

      Robert S. Kolesnik, in support of the petition.

      Karen L. Murdoch, in opposition.
    Decided April 15, 1998
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 16260) is denied.


text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. ALEX KELLY
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 17823) is denied.

CALLAHAN, C. J., and BORDEN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Hope C. Seeley, in support of the petition.

Susan C. Marks, supervisory assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided April 15, 1998


text:
    IN RE ROBERT T.

      Francis A. Miniter, in support of the petition.

      Bruce R. Lockwood, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
    Decided April 15, 1998
   The respondent Robert T.’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 17929) is denied.


text:
    RALPH BRUNO v. CAR SERVICE, INC.

      Peter E. Garvey, in support of the petition.
    Decided April 15, 1998
   The defendant BMW of North America’s petition for certification for appeal is dismissed.


text:
    MICHAEL CONSTANTOPOULOS v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

      Todd Edgington, assistant public defender, in support of the petition.
    Decided April 28, 1998
   The petitioner Michael Constantopoulos’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 47 Conn. App. 828 (AC 16293), is denied.


text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. MICHAEL WATSON
    The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15924.

      Mark Rademacher, assistant public defender, in support of the petition.

      Frederick W. Fawcett, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
    Decided April 28, 1998
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 47 Conn. App. 794 (AC 16560), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly uphold the trial court’s instruction that the reasonable doubt standard and the presumption of innocence are ‘designed to protect the innocent and not the guilty’?
“2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court properly permitted the state to cross-examine the defendant’s alibi witness regarding her failure to report the alibi to the proper authorities?”

NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    ROSALIE ZANONI v. PAUL A. HUDON, CONSERVATOR (ESTATE OF HELEN A. BENNY), ET AL.

      Rosalie Zanoni, pro se, in support of the petition.

      Karen L. Murdoch, in opposition.
    Decided April 28, 1998
   The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 32 (AC 14012), is denied.


text:
    JENNIE T. SCHMALING v. SCOTT M. SCHMALING SCOTT M. SCHMALING v. JENNIE T. SCHMALING ET AL.

      George J. Markley, in support of the petition.

      Kenneth J. Bartschi and Karen L. Murdoch, in opposition.
    Decided April 28, 1998
   The petition of Scott Schmaling for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 1 (AC 14649), is denied.


text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. DAVID BISPHAM
    The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15925.

      Glenn W. Falk, in support of the petition.

      Lisa Herskowitz, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
    Decided April 28, 1998
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 135 (AC 15820), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting a written statement of the complainant as constancy of accusation evidence, and that the defendant did not show prejudice from the admission of such evidence, despite the prosecutor’s closing argument that the written statement would be available for review in the jury room to support the complainant’s credibility?”


author: BERDON, J.,

text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. LEONORA RYAN

      Norman A. Pattis, in support of the petition.

      Mitchell S. Brody, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
    Decided April 28, 1998
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 148 (AC 15840), is denied.

BERDON, J.,

dissenting. I would grant the defendant’s petition for certification to appeal.


text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. GARY OLIVER

      J. Brendan Sharkey, special public defender, in support of the petition.

      Ellen A. Jawitz, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
    Decided April 28, 1998
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 41 (AC 15854), is denied.


text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. BRUCE IVERSON

      Louis S. Avitabile, special public defender, in support of the petition.

      LeonF. Dalbec, Jr., assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
    Decided April 28, 1998
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 168 (AC 16029), is denied.


text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. DESI ARNEZ MORTON

      Donald D. Dakers, special public defender, in support of the petition.

      Paul Ferencek, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
    Decided April 28, 1998
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 903 (AC 16391), is denied.


text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. JEFFREY PERRY

      Suzanne Zitser, assistant public defender, in support of the petition.

      Lisa Herskowitz, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
    Decided April 28, 1998
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 193 (AC 16716), is denied.

NORCOTT and KATZ, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    JOSEPH K. MIMMS v. DARIEN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL.

      Charles D. Ray, in support of the petition.
    Decided April 28, 1998
   The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 903 (AC 16769), is denied.


text:
    THEODORE N. LENCZYK v. MICHAEL A. GEORGETTI, ADMINISTRATOR D.B.N. (ESTATE OF THEODORE D. LENCZYK)

      Theodore N. Lenczyk, pro se, in support of the petition.

      Michael A. Georgetti, in opposition.
    Decided April 28, 1998
   The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 903 (AC 16903), is denied.

MCDONALD, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    JEROME L. KLEIN ET AL. v. JOHN P. TESEI ET AL.

      Mark J. Kovack, in support of the petition.

      Michael J. Leventhal, in opposition.
    Decided April 28, 1998
   The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 905 (AC 17082), is denied.

CALLAHAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    LOUISE D. ROBINSON v. COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND OPPORTUNITIES

      Louise D. Robinson, pro se, in support of the petition.
    Decided April 28, 1998
   The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 902 (AC 17117), is denied.


text:
    BERKELEY FEDERAL BANK AND TRUST, FSB v. FRANK F. OGALIN ET AL.

      Roy W. Moss, in support of the petition.

      Matthew J. Forstadt, in opposition.
    Decided April 28, 1998
   The defendants Frank F. Ogalin and Verna T. Ogalin’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 205 (AC 17206), is denied.


text:
    RIVERMEAD CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. v. SUZANNE SEARLES ET AL.

      Suzanne Searles, pro se, in support of the petition.
    Decided April 28, 1998
   The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 17216) is denied.


text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. MAURICE BILLIE
    The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15929.
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal and the cross petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 47 Conn. App. 678 (AC 15347), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court abused its discretion in striking the testimony of the defendant’s expert witness regarding the substance known as ‘illy’ and its effects?
“2. If the answer to question one is yes, did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court’s error was harmless?”

James B. Streeto, special public defender, in support of the petition.

John A. East III, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

John A. East III, assistant state’s attorney, in support of cross petition.

Decided March 7, 1998


text:
    KENNETH JONES ET AL. v. ALLAN A. CRYSTAL, COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE SERVICES

      Dana Shaw MacKinnon, in support of the petition.

      Jonathon L. Ensign, assistant attorney general, in opposition.
    Decided May 7, 1998
   The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 47 Conn. App. 694 (AC 15799), is denied.


text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. CLARENCE GLENN
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 47 Conn. App. 706 (AC 16519), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that, under article first, § 7, of the Connecticut constitution, in order for a defendant to secure a hearing regarding the veracity of an affidavit supporting a warrant, the defendant must make a showing of either intentional dishonesty or reckless disregard for the truth by an affiant, and that a showing that the informant gave materially false information is insufficient?”

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15928.

Theresa M. Dalton, assistant public defender, in support of the petition.

Ronald G. Weller, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided May 7, 1998


text:
    STANLEY CHANCE v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

      Stanley Chance, pro se, in support of the petition.
    Decided May 7, 1998
   The petitioner Stanley Chance’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 47 Conn. App. 935 (AC 16872), is denied.

KATZ, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    MICHAEL A. KALLAS v. CHARLES HARNEN

      Donald A. Mitchell, in support of the petition.
    Decided May 7, 1998
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 253 (AC 16720), is denied.


text:
    BONNIE JEAN FORESHAW v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION
   The petitioner Bonnie Jean Foreshaw’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 122 (AC 16276), is denied.

Diane Polan, in support of the petition.

Rita M. Shair, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided May 7, 1998

KATZ, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    CHARLES BENLOCK v. NEW HAVEN TERMINAL/ CILCO TERMINAL ET AL.

      Scott Wilson Williams, in support of the petition.

      Carolyn P. Kelly, in opposition.
    Decided May 7, 1998
   The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 250 (AC 17178), is denied.


text:
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. RALSTON SALMON
    The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15930.

      Matthew P. Tuller, in support of petition.
   The petition by the surety B & B Bail Bonds Agency, Inc., for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 17752) is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the appellant bail bond company, as a nonparty to this criminal action, had no right to appeal from the judgment of the trial court denying its motions for release of bond and for rebate on its bond?”

Carolyn K. Longstreth, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided May 7, 1998


text:
    TOWN OF HAMDEN ET AL. v. LEE S. BRADY ET AL.

      Lee S. Brady, in support of the petition.

      Barbara G. Lifton, in opposition.
    Decided May 7, 1998
   The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 17920) is denied.