author: ROTHENBERG, J.

text:
    KEYS ISLAND PROPERTIES, LLC, Appellant, v. Daniel E. CROW, II, et al., Appellees.
    No. 3D12-360.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Sept. 19, 2012.
    Tabas, Freedman, Soloff, Miller & Brown, P.A., and Gary M. Freedman, Miami, and Rosana Hernandez, Hollywood, for appellant.
    Vernis & Bowling, and Jerry D. Sanders, Key West, for appellees.
    Before CORTIÑAS, ROTHENBERG, and LOGUE, JJ.
   ROTHENBERG, J.

Jaden Lane, LLC, the predecessor-in-interest to Keys Island Properties, LLC (“the appellant”), filed the instant lawsuit seeking to enforce an easement, created in 1895, on Daniel E. Crow, II, et al.’s (“the appellees”) property. The trial court entered final judgment in favor of the appel-lees, determining that the easement had been extinguished by a 2003 quiet title action (“the quiet title action”). In so holding, the trial court noted that the plaintiff in the quiet title action, Charles William Ansell, II (“Ansell”), had filed the quiet title complaint to establish his various ownership interests in the dominant and servient tenements, and that the quiet title action featured all parties having any claim thereto. The trial court further determined that the easement had been placed at issue in the quiet title action because Ansell had attached a survey to the quiet title complaint depicting all the relevant parcels of land, including one that made reference to a “cone alleyway,” which the appellees contend represents the easement. Finally, the trial court observed that the parties to the quiet title action ultimately stipulated to a final judgment, but did not specifically provide for an easement in its final metes and bounds description. On these facts, the trial court determined that “[ajlthough a part of the Complaint, the easement was not part of the Final Judgment and thus, it was extinguished.” We reverse, as we conclude the quiet title action did not concern, and therefore did not affect, the easement at issue.

Upon review of the pleadings in the prior quiet title action, it is evident that no issue with respect to the easement, or its extinguishment, was properly pleaded. Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.110(b)(2) requires that “a pleading which sets forth a claim for relief ... must state a cause of action and shall contain ... a short and plain statement of the ultimate facts showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.” In the quiet title action, however, neither the pleadings nor the prayer for relief contained any mention of the easement. In the complaint, the plaintiff sought only “to quiet and confirm title” and establish his varying ownership interests in the relevant parcels of land, including a one-third interest in the dominant tenements, and one hundred percent interest in the ser-vient tenement., Such relief, however, is not germane to the existence or extin-guishment of an easement, which “is a right distinct from ownership of the land itself and does not confer title to the land on which the easement is imposed.” Wingate v. Wingate, 84 So.3d 427, 429 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (citing Platt v. Pietras, 382 So.2d 414, 416 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980)); see also Dean v. MOD Props., Ltd., 528 So.2d 432, 433 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988) (explaining that “[o]wnership of land, or an ownership interest in land, constitutes an ‘estate’ as distinguished from an easement, which is the right in one other than the owner of the land to use land for some particular purpose or purposes”).

We also reject the trial court’s conclusion that the survey attached as an exhibit to the complaint placed the easement or its extinguishment at issue. Clearly, the inclusion of the survey, in and of itself, did not satisfy the requirements of rule 1.110(b)(2) because it did not constitute “a short and plain statement of the ultimate facts showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.” (emphasis added). In addition, given the specified prayer for relief, which did not relate to the easement, the survey fell far short of placing the parties on notice that the easement or its extinguishment was at issue. As the appellants explain, to hold otherwise would facilitate, if not promote, the taking of property interests by ambush.

Thus, no issue relating to the easement was properly pleaded, and neither the parties nor the trial court were put on notice regarding any potential for the extinguishment of the easement. Under these circumstances, the trial court lacked jurisdiction to extinguish the easement. See Pro-Art Dental Lab, Inc. v. V-Strategic Grp., LLC, 986 So.2d 1244, 1252 (Fla.2008) (quoting Carroll & Assocs., P.A. v. Galindo, 864 So.2d 24, 28-29 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)) (noting that “Florida law clearly holds that a trial court lacks jurisdiction to hear and to determine matters which are not the subject of proper pleading and notice” and “[t]o allow a court to rule on a matter without proper pleadings and notice is violative of a party’s due process rights”) (emphasis removed); Mizrahi v. Mizrahi, 867 So.2d 1211, 1213 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004) (“Due process protections prevent a trial court from deciding matters not noticed for hearing and not the subject of appropriate pleadings.”). Therefore, the failure of the parties to provide for the easement in the final judgment could not have resulted in its extinguishment.

Finally, we conclude that the trial court’s reliance on Estate of Johnston v. TPE Hotels, Inc., 719 So.2d 22 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998), was misplaced. In Johnston, the owners of the dominant and servient tenements of an express, perpetual easement joined to dedicate and record a plat encompassing both properties. Id. at 24. When recording the plat, however, the parties made no reference to the easement. Id. The Fifth District analyzed the effect of these actions on a subsequent purchaser of the servient tenement who, after relying on the plat, had no notice of the easement.

The Fifth District noted that the specific purpose of a plat “is to protect subsequent purchasers of the property in the subdivision so that by studying the plat or map they can determine what rights and burdens are imposed on the property by the dedicators.” Id. at 28; see also 35 Fla.Jur. 2d Maps, Plats, & Surveys § 10 (2012) (“The regulation and control of platting of land is governed by consistent minimum statutory requirements, the main purpose of which is to protect and inform the public, especially innocent purchasers. Consequently, any inconsistency or ambiguity in the plat is construed against the developer who created it.”) (footnotes omitted). Because of the special protections afforded by a plat, the Fifth District determined that:

[the actions of the owners] in platting both tenements and omitting mention of the prior recorded easement should be construed against them.
[S]ince both of the owners of the ser-vient and dominant tenements joined in the dedication of the plat and the plat failed to disclose the easement, they should be held, as against subsequent purchasers pursuant to the plat without notice, to the representation of the subdivision, as shown on the recorded map.

Id. at 27-28 (emphasis added). Thus, the Fifth District held that “the successor owner of the dominant tenement ... [was] estopped to claim any continuing right to the perpetual easement.” Id. at 27.

Unlike in Johnston, this case features a final judgment, rather than a plat. As a result, the special protections afforded by a plat do not apply here. Further, in this case, the successor-in-interest to the ser-vient tenement was not a bona fide purchaser without notice of the easement. Thus, the principles articulated in Johnston are wholly inapplicable.

In holding that the quiet title action did not extinguish the 1895 easement, we take no position on the current nature of the easement, be it express or implied, the easement’s current dimensions, or whether the easement may have been extinguished by virtue of some other legal mechanism. The parties are, of course, free to litigate these issues should they so choose.

Reversed.

      . Importantly, the easement was not thrust into issue by the potential for ‘'merger” because the plaintiff did not seek to establish coextensive, equal ownership interests in the dominant and servient tenements. See Lacy v. Seegers, 445 So.2d 400, 401 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984) (explaining that an easement may be extinguished under the doctrine of “merger” when there is-a “unity of ownership,” which occurs only when the ownership interests in the dominant and servient tenements are "coextensive and equal in validity, quality, and all other circumstances of right”).

      . We also note that since the plaintiff was seeking to establish his sole ownership of the dominant tenements, he would have benefited from the easement’s existence, and thus likely had no interest in extinguishing it.


source: Caselaw Access Project

author: NORTHCUTT, Judge.

license: Public Domain

text:
    Ezra N. MADDOX, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 2D11-221.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Sept. 19, 2012.
    James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Allyn M. Giambalvo, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard M. Fishkin, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appel-lee.
   NORTHCUTT, Judge.

The circuit court revoked Ezra Maddox’s probation for a curfew violation and sentenced him to prison. But the curfew condition had been added after Maddox began serving his term of probation. As such, the condition violated the constitutional protection against double jeopardy. Accordingly, we reverse the revocation of Maddox’s probation.

Maddox was on probation for aggravated battery. The terms of his probation required that he serve 364 days in jail, but the jail time was to be suspended when a bed became available in a treatment program that he was ordered to attend as a condition of probation. An affidavit was later filed alleging that Maddox had violated his probation by being unsuccessfully discharged from the treatment program. Maddox was held in jail, but the affidavit was later dismissed. The court then ordered Maddox to complete a different treatment program and agreed to release Maddox from jail until a bed was available. But the court ordered Maddox to observe a curfew, which was not a condition of his original probation. Maddox subsequently admitted that he broke the curfew, whereupon the court revoked his probation and sentenced him to five years in prison.

On appeal, Maddox argues that double jeopardy principles precluded the addition of a curfew condition to his probation terms. He is correct. The double jeopardy protection applies to conditions of probation. Lippman v. State, 633 So.2d 1061,1064 (Fla.1994). Absent proof of a violation, the terms of a probationary sentence may not be enhanced. Id. Even when a nonviolating probationer has agreed to the enhancement, he is not es-topped from challenging it as a violation of double jeopardy. Casterline v. State, 703 So.2d 1071, 1073 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997) (citing Lippman).

Although Maddox had been charged with violating his probation, the charging affidavit was dismissed. Therefore, the circuit court was not permitted to add conditions to Maddox’s probation. Maddox may have agreed to the curfew in exchange for his release from jail pending the availability of a space in the treatment program. And his violation of the curfew may have warranted ordering him to jail until he entered the program. But it could not support a probation revocation because the curfew was not properly a condition of the probation. Accordingly, we reverse the revocation of Maddox’s probation.

Reversed and remanded.

MORRIS, J., and CASE, JAMES R., Associate Senior Judge, Concur.


author: PER CURIAM.

text:
    STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Nicole MILES, Appellee.
    No. 2D11-5897.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Sept. 19, 2012.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Elba Caridad Martin-Scho-maker, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellant.
    James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Matthew D. Bernstein, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

The State appeals the dismissal of the charges against Nicole Marie Miles for two counts of possession of a controlled substance in violation of section 893.13(6)(a), Florida Statutes (2011). The circuit court dismissed the charges based on its conclusion that section 893.13 was facially unconstitutional. We reverse based on the supreme court’s recent decision in State v. Adkins, 96 So.3d 412 (Fla.2012), which held that section 893.13 is not facially unconstitutional, and we remand for further proceedings.

Reversed.

KELLY, VILLANO!, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.


author: MORRIS, Judge.

text:
    BETHANY TRACE OWNERS’ ASSOCIATION, INC., a Florida nonprofit corporation, Petitioner, v. WHISPERING LAKES I, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, and Waterman-Pinnacle, Inc., a Florida corporation, f/k/a Bethany Trace Estates, Inc., Respondents.
    No. 2D12-463.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Sept. 19, 2012.
    Matthew Scott Toll of Matthew S. Toll, Esq., P.A., Cape Coral, for Petitioner.
    Steven H. Mezer, Keith D. Skorewicz, and Loren J. Beer of Bush Ross, P.A., Tampa, for Respondent Whispering Lakes I, LLC.
    Traci T. McKee of Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt, P.A., for Respondent Waterman-Pinnacle, Inc.
   MORRIS, Judge.

Bethany Trace Owners’ Association, Inc. (the Association), seeks certiorari review of an order granting a motion to stay its action for trespass and breach of covenant against Whispering Lakes I, LLC, and Waterman-Pinnacle, Inc. We deny the petition in part and grant the petition in part.

The circuit court granted Whispering Lakes’ motion to stay on the basis that the Association failed to obtain the required approval of its members before initiating its litigation. See § 720.303(1), Fla. Stat. (2010) (“Before commencing litigation against any party in the name of the association involving amounts in controversy in excess of $100,000, the association must obtain the affirmative approval of a majority of the voting interests at a meeting of the membership at which a quorum has been, attained.”). We deny the Association’s petition for writ of certiorari in part because the circuit court did not depart from the essential requirements of law in ruling that Whispering Lakes is a member of the Association and is therefore entitled to enforce the voting requirements of section 720.303(1). See Lake Forest Master Cmty. Ass’n v. Orlando Lake Forest Joint Venture, 10 So.3d 1187, 1196 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009) (holding that section 720.303(1) is “a ground for any aggrieved [association member to enjoin [an] [association from prosecuting [a] lawsuit”).

However, we grant the petition in part and quash the portion of the circuit court’s order requiring “Whispering Lakes’ votes to approve the continuation of this litigation.” While the Association argued that Whispering Lakes’ voting rights may be suspended based on its failure to pay the association dues, Whispering Lakes and Waterman-Pinnacle concede that the status of Whispering Lakes’ voting rights “was not an issue for determination at the hearing on the [mjotion to [s]tay.” The language in the order stating that Whispering Lakes’ votes are required is both premature and contrary to the circuit court’s oral ruling that this issue was not yet before the court. Accordingly, we quash that portion of the order.

Petition denied in part and granted in part; order quashed in part.

LaROSE and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.


author: ALTENBERND, Judge.

text:
    Carlos Ramos ESCOBAR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 2D12-476.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Sept. 19, 2012.

      Carlos Ramos Escobar, pro se.
   ALTENBERND, Judge.

Carlos Escobar appeals the denial of his postconviction motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. He claims that he should have been given the right to amend ground one of his motion before it was dismissed without an evidentiary hearing. We agree and reverse the order on appeal only to the extent that it did not allow Mr. Escobar an opportunity to amend ground one.

Mr. Escobar was charged with and convicted of lewd and lascivious molestation for events that occurred on July 1, 2007, in Hendry County. A little girl, approximately seven years old, testified that he molested her in her backyard. She claimed the crime occurred in a backyard fort that was concealed by trees. Her mother testified that she saw the girl leaving the area of the fort with Mr. Escobar following her. From this court’s record, which includes a large portion of the trial transcript, it does not appear that there were any witnesses to the molestation, and the child’s testimony does not appear to be corroborated by physical or genetic evidence.

In ground one of his motion, Mr. Esco-bar identified two men by name. He claimed that at least one of them would testify that he was working with Mr. Esco-bar and that Mr. Escobar never left the backyard. The trial court ordered the State to respond to this motion. The State argued that although the pleading was facially insufficient in some respects, Mr. Escobar should not be given an opportunity to amend under Spera v. State, 971 So.2d 754, 762 (Fla.2007), because this testimony would not have helped Mr. Esco-bar. The trial court accepted this argument and dismissed the motion without leave to amend.

It is difficult to evaluate the effectiveness of the proffered testimony without, at a minimum, a facially sufficient motion. Although the trial court is likely correct that the strength of the mother’s testimony would be difficult for either of the possible witnesses to overcome, we are hesitant to conclude this postconviction proceeding at this stage. Accordingly, we reverse and remand with instructions to permit Mr. Escobar the opportunity to amend ground one of this motion. Given that Mr. Escobar will find it very difficult to obtain affidavits from these two men from his prison cell and because an attorney on his behalf might be able to better assess the merits of this claim without involving the victim or her family, this may be an appropriate case in which to appoint an attorney to assist Mr. Escobar with his amendment.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

SILBERMAN, C.J., and NORTHCUTT, J., concur.


text:
    Dan PEREZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 3D12-2241.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Sept. 19, 2012.
    Sherri A. Romano, Miami, for appellant.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.
    Before CORTINAS, ROTHENBERG and FERNANDEZ, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Hernandez v. State, 61 So.3d 1144 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011), review granted, 81 So.3d 414 (Fla.2012).


text:
    Jeffrey M. ADEEB and Deanna Lynn Brueck-Adeeb, Appellants, v. Ronal Scott MORGAN and Laura F. Morgan, Appellees.
    No. 3D11-3265.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Sept. 19, 2012.
    Lewis Longman & Walker, and Andrew J. Baumann, West Palm Beach, for appellants.
    The Silver Law Group, and Patricia M. Silver, Islamorada, for appellees.
    Before WELLS, C.J., and SUAREZ, and FERNANDEZ, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm in part the Order Granting Summary Judgment in favor of appellees, Ronald Scott Morgan and Laura F. Morgan. However, we reverse only that portion of the trial court’s order which awards prevailing party attorneys’ fees to the Morgans, as these attorneys’ fees are not authorized by statute or contract in this case.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part.


text:
    Fitz JEAN-SIMON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 3D11-89.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Sept. 19, 2012.
    Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Daniel Tibbit, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

      Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Douglas J. Glaid, Senior Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
    Before CORTIÑAS, ROTHENBERG, and LOGUE, JJ.
   ROTHENBERG, J.

We affirm on all issues, except that we remand with instructions for the trial court to correct the judgment, which erroneously reflects that the defendant was convicted of two first degree felonies. The judgment shall be amended to reflect that the defendant was convicted of attempted sale of a controlled substance, a third degree felony, and possession with intent to sell a controlled substance, a second degree felony.

Affirmed and remanded with instructions.


text:
    Tony Lamar WINGARD, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    No. 1D12-3127.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Sept. 19, 2012.
    Tony Lamar Wingard, pro se, Petitioner.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Brooke Poland, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is granted. Petitioner shall be allowed a belated appeal from the January 11, 2012, order denying the motion to correct illegal sentence, in Duval County Circuit Court case number 2005-CF-15253-AXXX. Upon issuance of mandate in this cause, a copy of this opinion shall be provided to the clerk of the circuit court for treatment as the notice of appeal. Fla. RApp. P. 9.141(c)(5)(D). If petitioner qualifies for appointed counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent petitioner on appeal.

WOLF, DAVIS, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.


text:
    Gregory BAKER, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Appellee.
    No. 1D12-2267.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Sept. 20, 2012.
    Gregory Baker, pro se, Appellant.
    No appearance for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. Mathews v. Risk Management, 16 So.3d 230 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009).

PADOVANO, THOMAS, and CLARK, JJ., concur.


text:
    Tamalari R. ARNOLD, Appellant, v. Thomas C. WHITLEY, Jr., Appellee.
    No. 5D12-1019.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Sept. 21, 2012.
    Tamalari R. Arnold, Winter Garden, pro se.
    Nikie N. Lomax, of Young DeLoach, PLLC, Orlando, for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Tamalari Arnold appeals pro se from a final judgment on petition for determination of paternity, time sharing, and related relief. Our review of this case is limited because the record contains no transcript of the final hearing. Consequently, we can only address errors that appear on the face of the final judgment. See Engesser v. Engesser, 42 So.3d 249, 250 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010). On appeal, the trial court’s ruling is presumed correct, and when no transcript is provided, a judgment that is not fundamentally erroneous will be affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979). Having reviewed the final judgment entered, we find no error.

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN, EVANDER and BERGER, JJ., concur.


text:
    Sylvia MITCHELL, Appellant, v. Allyson M. TUCKER and William Tucker, Appellee.
    No. 5D12-1833.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Sept. 21, 2012.
    Sylvia C. Mitchell, Deland, pro se.
    No Appearance for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Hammond v. Howard 828 So.2d 476, 478 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) (reiterating that where custody dispute is between parents and third person, rights of parents are paramount unless there is showing that parents are unfit or that, for some substantial reason, custody in either or both parents would be detrimental to child’s welfare).

ORFINGER, C.J., SAWAYA and COHEN, JJ., concur.


text:
    Frank W. BROZIK, IV, Appellant, v. Dana M. WALTERS, Appellee.
    No. 5D12-272.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Sept. 21, 2012.
    Frank W. Brozik, IV, Brooksville, pro se.
    No Appearance for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Frank W. Brozik, IV appeals a post-judgment order of civil contempt. Mr. Brozik has failed to provide a transcript of the final hearing or a statement of the evidence or the proceedings pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.200(b)(4). Without an adequate record, and because there is no error apparent on the face of the order itself, we affirm. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979) (“Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not [sic] properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court’s judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory.”); see Mayfield v. Mayfield, 929 So.2d 671, 672-73 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006); Poling v. Palm Coast Abstract & Title, Inc., 882 So.2d 483, 485 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).

AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER, C.J., SAWAYA and COHEN, JJ., concur.


text:
    Gilbert RAMIREZ, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    No. 1D12-1033.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Sept. 21, 2012.
    Gilbert Ramirez, pro se, Petitioner.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Edward C. Hill, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

Gilbert Ramirez petitions this court for a writ of mandamus. He seeks to compel the Circuit Court for Duval County to rule on a motion for postconviction relief which he filed two years ago in that court’s case number 2004-CF-10692. The State of Florida has been directed to respond to the postconviction motion. No disposition of the merits of the motion, however, has been made by the circuit court.

The trial court’s delay in acting on the motion is unreasonable and a writ of mandamus is appropriate in the circumstances. See Bernard, v. State, 734 So.2d 606 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). We grant the petition and issue the writ of mandamus. Within 30 days of the date of issuance of mandate in this cause, the circuit court shall either issue a final order on the postconviction motion or, if it finds that an evidentiary hearing is necessary, enter an order scheduling such hearing.

PETITION GRANTED; WRIT ISSUED.

MARSTILLER, RAY, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.


text:
    Derron FORSYTHE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    No. 1D12-1694.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Sept. 21, 2012.
    Derron Forsythe, pro se, Petitioner.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Heather Flanagan Ross, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

The petition is granted and Derron For-sythe is hereby afforded belated appeal of judgment and sentence in Leon County case number 2009-CF-1421 A. Upon issuance of mandate in this cause, a copy of the opinion will be provided to the clerk of the lower tribunal who shall treat it as a notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(c)(6)(D).

PETITION GRANTED.

MARSTILLER, RAY, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.


text:
    Fred CLEVELAND, Jr., Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    No. 1D12-2552.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Sept. 21, 2012.
    Fred Cleveland, Jr., pro se, Petitioner.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Heather Flanagan Ross, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

The petition is granted and Fred Antonio Cleveland, Jr. is hereby afforded a belated appeal of judgment and sentence in Escambia County case number 2010 CF 004676A. Upon issuance of mandate in this cause, a copy of the opinion shall be provided to the clerk of the lower tribunal who should treat it as a notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(c)(6)(D).

PETITION GRANTED.

MARSTILLER, RAY, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.


text:
    Steven THOMAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D12-2801.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Sept. 21, 2012.
    Steven Thomas, pro se, Appellant.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

The summary denial of appellant’s motion for postconviction relief is reversed because the trial court failed to attach the portions of the record it relied upon in denying the motion. See Isaac v. State, 45 So.3d 42 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010). On remand, the trial court is directed to attach the relevant portions of the record to its order. Id.

REVERSED and REMANDED with directions.

ROBERTS, WETHERELL, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.


text:
    Sandra Davis THOMPSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D12-0766.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Sept. 27, 2012.
    Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General and Joshua R. Heller, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. State v. Adkins, 96 So.3d 412 (Fla.2012).

DAVIS, CLARK, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.


text:
    Sierra CHURCH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D12-0098.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Sept. 27, 2012.
    Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Edward C. Hill, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See State v. Adkins, 96 So.3d 412 (Fla.2012).

MARSTILLER, RAY, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.


text:
    Stoney Fenier MATHIS, II, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D11-5798.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Sept. 27, 2012.
    Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Trisha Meggs Pate and Christine Ann Guard, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See State v. Adkins, 96 So.3d 412 (Fla.2012).

MARSTILLER, RAY, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.


text:
    James Marvin NUNISS, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D11-5537.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Sept. 27, 2012.
    Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jennifer J. Moore, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See State v. Adkins, 96 So.3d 412 (Fla.2012).

MARSTILLER, RAY, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.


text:
    Nathan E. BIDDLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D11-5482.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Sept. 27, 2012.
    Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Giselle D. Lylen, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See State v. Adkins, 96 So.3d 412 (Fla.2012).

MARSTILLER, RAY, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.


text:
    Robert A. WRIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D11-5220.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Sept. 27, 2012.
    Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Charlie McCoy, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See State v. Adkins, 96 So.3d 412 (Fla.2012).

MARSTILLER, RAY, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.


text:
    Jamel MOBLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D11-2720.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Sept. 28, 2012.

      Scott W. Sakin, Miami, for Appellant.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Heather Flanagan Ross, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of attempted second-degree murder, attempted felony murder, attempted armed robbery, and aggravated assault. He seeks reversal of the convictions, arguing that the trial court erred in permitting the State’s peremptory challenges against two African-American prospective jurors, and that his convictions for attempted second-degree murder and attempted felony murder violate the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy. We affirm as to the first issue, finding the asserted error unpreserved for appellate review. However, we conclude-^ and the State concedes — that the merger doctrine, as opposed to double jeopardy, prohibits convictions for both attempted second-degree murder and attempted felony murder in this case. See Williams v. State, 90 So.3d 931, 935 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (reversing attempted felony murder under merger doctrine where defendant was also convicted of attempted premeditated first-degree murder, and stating that “[w]e do not think that the Legislature authorized the imposition of multiple punishments for attempted premeditated first-degree murder and attempted felony murder for the same attempted killing of one victim, tuhen there is not a separate criminal episode or distinct acts on which to base each attempted murder conviction.”) (emphasis added).

Accordingly, we reverse Appellant’s conviction for attempted felony murder and remand with directions to strike the conviction. We affirm Appellant’s remaining convictions for attempted second-degree murder, attempted armed robbery, and aggravated assault.

AFFIRMED, in part; REVERSED, in part; REMANDED with directions.

THOMAS, WETHERELL, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.


text:
    Jermaine WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D11-6276.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Sept. 28, 2012.
    Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and M.J. Lord, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General; Heather Flanagan Ross and Christine Ann Guard, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See State v. Adkins, 96 So.3d 412 (Fla.2012).

ROBERTS, WETHERELL, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.


text:
    Rebecca Faith RUGG, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D11-5324.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Oct. 2, 2012.
    Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General and Thomas H. Duffy, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. State v. Adkins, 96 So.3d 412 (Fla.2012).

PADOVANO, THOMAS, and CLARK, JJ., concur.


text:
    Michael DELIA, Petitioner, v. JIMCO MAINTENANCE, INC. & Amerisure Mutual Insurance Company, Respondents.
    No. 1D12-2908.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Oct. 2, 2012.
    David C. Wiitala of Wiitala & Contole, P.A., North Palm Beach, for Petitioner.
    William H. Rogner of Hurley, Rogner, Miller, Cox, Waranch & Westcott, P.A., Winter Park, for Respondents.
   PER CURIAM.

DENIED.

BENTON, C.J., ROBERTS, and RAY, JJ., concur.


text:
    In re Frank MILLER, III.
    No. 2012-OB-1862.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Sept. 12, 2012.
   In re Disciplinary Counsel; Miller III, Frank; — Other(s); Applying For Joint Petition for Transfer to Disability Inactive Status.

ORDER

17 Considering the Joint Petition for Transfer to Disability Inactive Status,

IT IS ORDERED that Frank Miller, III, Louisiana Bar Roll number 19710, be and he hereby is transferred to disability inactive status. All disciplinary proceedings against respondent shall be deferred until such time as he resumes active status.

Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 26(E), this order shall be effective immediately.

FOR THE COURT:

/s/ Greg G. Guidry Justice, Supreme Court of Louisiana


text:
    In re Johnny Carl PARKERSON.
    No. 2012-OB-1470.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Sept. 12, 2012.
   In re Parkerson, Johnny Carl; — Plaintiff; Applying For Petition for Voluntary Permanent Resignation from the Practice of Law in Lieu of Discipline Pursuant to Rule XIX § 20.1.

ORDER

_jjThe Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) is conducting an investigation into allegations that respondent engaged in conduct constituting a conflict of interest. Respondent now seeks to permanently resign from the practice of law in lieu of discipline. The ODC has concurred in respondent’s petition.

Having considered the Petition for Voluntary Permanent Resignation from the Practice of Law filed by Johnny Carl Par-kerson, Louisiana Bar Roll number 10060, and the concurrence thereto filed by the ODC,

IT IS ORDERED that the request of Johnny Carl Parkerson for permanent resignation in lieu of discipline be and is hereby granted, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 20.1 and Rule 5.5 of the Rules of Professional Conduct.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Johnny Carl Parkerson shall be permanently prohibited from practicing law in Louisiana or in any other jurisdiction in which he is admitted to the practice of law; shall be permanently prohibited from seeking readmission to the practice of law in this state or in any other jurisdiction in which he is admitted; and shall be permanently prohibited from seeking admission to the practice of law in any jurisdiction.

FOR THE COURT:

/s/ Greg G. Guidry Justice, Supreme Court of Louisiana


text:
    In re Alfred F. McCALEB, III.
    No. 2012-OB-1460.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Sept. 12, 2012.
   In re Disciplinary Counsel; McCaleb III, Alfred F.; — Other(s); Applying For Petition for Voluntary Permanent Resignation form the Practice of Law in Lieu of Discipline.

ORDER

|,The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) is conducting an investigation into allegations involving respondent’s criminal convictions for driving under the influence of alcohol and interfering with a police officer. Respondent now seeks to permanently resign from the practice of law in lieu of discipline. The ODC has concurred in respondent’s petition.

Having considered the Petition for Permanent Resignation from the Practice of Law filed by Alfred F. McCaleb, HI,. Louisiana Bar Roll number 9216, and the concurrence thereto filed by the ODC,

IT IS ORDERED that the request of Alfred F. McCaleb, III for permanent resignation in lieu of discipline be and is hereby granted, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 20.1 and Rule 5.5 of the Rules of Professional Conduct.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Alfred F. McCaleb, III shall be permanently prohibited from practicing law in Louisiana or in any other jurisdiction in which he is admitted to the practice of law; shall be permanently prohibited from seeking readmission to the practice of law in this state or in any other jurisdiction in which he is admitted; and shall be permanently prohibited from seeking admission to the practice of law in any jurisdiction.

FOR THE COURT:

/s/ John L. Weimer Justice, Supreme Court of Louisiana


text:
    In re Gregory J. AVERY.
    No. 2012-B-0598.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Sept. 12, 2012.
   In re Disciplinary Counsel; — Other; Applying For Findings and Recommendations (Formal Charges) Office of Disciplinary Board, No. ll-DB-027.

ORDER

|,Treating respondent’s “Supplemental Submission with Exhibits” as a request for transfer to disability inactive status pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 22(C),

IT IS ORDERED that Gregory J. Avery, Louisiana Bar Roll number 2618, be and he hereby is transferred to interim disability inactive status pending a hearing to determine the validity of his claim of disability. Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 22(C), all disciplinary proceedings shall be stayed pending this determination.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent’s “Supplemental Submission with Exhibits” shall be maintained under seal.

Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 26(E), this order shall be effective immediately.

FOR THE COURT:

/s/ Greg G. Guidry Justice, Supreme Court of Louisiana


text:
    STATE ex rel. Charles CARTER v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2011-KH-2756.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Carter, Charles; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Pointe Coupee, 18th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 59,370; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2011 KW 1807.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 980.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189; La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3; State ex rel. Melinie v. State, 93-1380 (La.1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Jamal B. FORD v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2011-KH-2770.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Ford, Jamal B.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. K, No. 411-677; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011 K 1597.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189; La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3; State ex rel. Melinie v. State, 93-1380 (La.1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Robert LaTroy WHITE v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2011-KH-2774.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re White, Robert LaTroy; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. G, No. 434333; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2011 KW 1646.

Denied.

WEIMER, J., recused.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Jessie James WILLIAMS v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2011-KH-2788.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Williams, Jessie James; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedíal Writs, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. 3, No. 270,644; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 47,-043-KH.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Drew PIZZO v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2011-KH-2795.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Pizzo, Drew; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 88-876; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, Nos. 08-WR-1235, ll-KH-825.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Barry BRADY a/k/a Barry Braddy v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2011-KH-2800.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Barry Brady a/k/a Barry Brad-dy; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. K, No. 497-714; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-K-1516.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Terry KRAEMER v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2011-KH-2801.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Kraemer, Terry; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Terrebonne, 32nd Judicial District Court Div. D, Nos. 443787, 448808; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2011 KW 1728.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Mark ENGLAND v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2011-KH-2804.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re England, Mark; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. G, No. 04-4418; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 11-KH-765.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Guy J. BOUDREAUX, Jr. v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2011-KH-2805.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Boudreaux Jr., Guy J.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. I, No. 451,303; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2011 KA 0833.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Roosevelt HOLMES v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2011-KH-2806.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Holmes, Roosevelt; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. I, No. 465-380; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-K-1551.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189; La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3; State ex rel. Melinie v. State, 93-1380 (La.1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Robert Todd GRIFFIN v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2011-KH-2808.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Griffin, Robert Todd; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Tensas, 6th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 72-291; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Nos. 46,-854-KH, 47036-KH.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Corey HOLDER v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2011-KH-2815.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Holder, Corey; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 240612; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 46965-KH.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Leonard McGEE v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2011-KH-2825.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re McGee, Leonard; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. O, No. 04-364; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, Nos. 11-KH-993, ll-KH-1177.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Derrick TOMLINSON v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2011-KH-2826.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Tomlinson, Derrick; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 03-4031; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 11-KH-1046.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189; La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3; State ex rel. Melinie v. State, 93-1380 (La.1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Louis WHITE v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2011-KH-2827.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re White, Louis; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 121,481; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 47,039-KH.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 980.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2380 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Chad E. JONES v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2011-KH-2828.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Jones, Chad E.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Natchitoches, 10th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. C15418; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KA 11-429.

Denied.


text:
    Leroy JONES v. LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS.
    No. 2011-CI-2829.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Jones, Leroy; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. 1, No. 599623; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2011 CW 2109.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Rickell JOHNSON v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0007.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Johnson, Rickell; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. K, No. 00-5498; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 11-KH-983.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Joseph MERANTA v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0010.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Meranta, Joseph; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. J, No. 368641; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2011 KW 1664.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Joshua Phillip DEAN v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0011.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Dean, Joshua Phillip; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Terrebonne, 32nd Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 507,564; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 KA 1020.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Derek VANCE v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0012.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Vance, Derek; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. G, No. 435-205; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-K-1332.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.


text:
    STATE ex rel. William CHATTMAN v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0013.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Chattman, William; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. 0, No. 98-6947; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 11-KH-1120.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2380 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Andre D. LEONARD v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0014.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Leonard, Andre D.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. H, No. 08-6468; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 11-KA-363.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Mack FORBES v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0015.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Forbes, Mack; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. G, No. 116,32.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Jarvis Dontrell JONES v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0016.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Jones, Jarvis Dontrell; — Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Bossier, 26th Judicial District Court Div. B, Nos. 182,837, 183,-022; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Nos. 46,712-KA, 46,713-KA.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Clinton BELL v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0020.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Bell, Clinton; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. E, No. 92228; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2011 KW 1977.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189; La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3; State ex rel. Melinie v. State, 93-1380 (La.1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Perry M. GRANT v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0021.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Grant, Perry M.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Acadia, 15th Judicial District Court Div. H, No. 41,178; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KH-11-00377.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Rene NETTER v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0032.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Netter, Rene; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. P, No. 09-3337; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, Nos. ll-KA-202,11KA-203.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Nathaniel A. HERNANDEZ v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0033.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   IN RE: Hernandez, Nathaniel A.;— Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. E, No. 10-726; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. ll-KA-146;

Denied.

GUIDRY, J., recused.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Felton READO, Jr. v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0034.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug.22, 2012.
   In re Reado Jr., Felton; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Calcasieu, 14th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 91-1678; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KH 11-01168.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Elizabeth ZACHARY v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0035.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Zachary, Elizabeth; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Livingston, 21st Judicial District Court Div. G, No. 9301481; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2011-KW-1787.

Denied.

WEIMER, J., recused.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Russell Gene WARE, Jr. v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0046.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Ware Jr., Russell Gene; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Rapides, 9th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 293,902; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 11-337.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Kevin W. KAIGLER v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0049.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Kaigler, Kevin W.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. F, No. 439243-1; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2011 KW 1683.

Denied. Repetitive. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4(A).


text:
    STATE ex rel. Ray RATTLER a/k/a Don Lee Williams v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0050.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Ray Rattler a/k/a Don Lee Williams; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. B, No. 248-646.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Ausbia R. TAYLOR v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0051.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Taylor, Ausbia R.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. D, No. 481-691; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-KA-1241.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Donald BURGO v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0065.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Burgo, Donald; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. Mary, City Court of Morgan City, No. 05-1258; 16th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 05-168512; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2011-KW-1881.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 980.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189. Cf. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4(D).


text:
    STATE ex rel. Ryan Patrick GREEN v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0066.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Green, Ryan Patrick; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Terrebonne, 32nd Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 437,767; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2011 KW 1732.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Willie J. WILSON v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0068.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Wilson, Willie J.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Lafayette, 15th Judicial District Court Div. H, No. 67980; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KH 11-00889.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P, art. 930.8; State ex rel Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189; State v. Parker, 98-0256 (La.5/8/98), 711 So.2d 694.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Byron BRIGGS v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0069.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Briggs, Byron; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. K, No. 473-330; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-K-1648.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Telly GUILLORY v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0089.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Guillory, Telly; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of West Feliciana, 20th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 98-6-254; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2011 KW 1530.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.

WEIMER, J., recused.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Joseph WILSON v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0090.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Wilson, Joseph; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 06-5717; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 11-KA-575.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Alfredo R. GONZALEZ v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0091.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Gonzalez, Alfredo R.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 273,151; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 47,-097-KH.

Denied. Repetitive. Cf. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930. 4(E).


text:
    STATE ex rel. Derrick WOODBERRY v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0093.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Woodberry, Derrick; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. I, No. 502-075; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-K-1679.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Keith BARTHELEMY v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0114.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Barthelemy, Keith; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. L, No. 434-488; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-K-1609.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Karen L. WILCOX v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0115.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Wilcox, Karen L.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 32880; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2011 KW 1941.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Michael Kevin HAILEY v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0128.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Hailey, Michael Kevin; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. 4, No. 234,728; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 47,-047-KH.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Kevin GOLDSTON v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0129.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Goldston, Kevin; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. E, No. 360-893; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-K-1741.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189; State v. Parker, 98-0256 (La.5/8/98), 711 So.2d 694.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Lakeith DEBROW v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0169.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Debrow, Lakeith; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. 3, No. 186,019; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 47,-071-KH.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. James B. HOLTS v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0170.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Holts, James B.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. F, No. 459880; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2011 KW 1869.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Azell FISHER v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0171.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In Re Fisher, Azell; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Union, 3rd Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 26,691; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 47101-KH.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189; La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3; State ex rel. Melinie v. State, 93-1380 (La.1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172. See also State v. Cotton, 09-2397 (La.10/15/10), 45 So.3d 1030; State v. Thomas, 08-2912, (La.10/16/09), 19 So.3d 466.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Vester JOHNSON v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0173.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Johnson, Vester; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Red River, 39th Judicial District Court Div. O, No. 100,994; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 47,-048-KH.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Arthur Ray ROBINSON v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0177.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Robinson, Arthur Ray; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. 4, No. 184,910; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 47,-131-KH.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189; La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3; State ex rel. Melinie v. State, 93-1380 (La.1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172. See also State v. Cotton, 09-2397 (La.10/15/10), 45 So.3d 1030.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Melvin PUGH v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0178.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Pugh, Melvin; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Bossier, 26th Judicial District Court Div. E, Nos. 116,907, 130,388-E; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 47,060-KH.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189; La.C.Cr.P. art.351.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Nicholas JOHNSON v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0192.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Johnson, Nicholas; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. 3, No. 272,321; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. KH 11-46941.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Richard PARKER v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0193.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Parker, Richard; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 07-93-1649; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2011 KW 1897.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189; La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3; State ex rel. Melinie v. State, 93-1380 (La.1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Chad ANDERSON v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0215.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Anderson, Chad; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Iberville, 17th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 1140-03; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2011 KW 1734.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Michael PHILIPS v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0217.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Philips, Michael; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. E, No. 87-2022; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 09-WR-1113.

Denied.

GUIDRY, J., recused.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Vincent SIMMONS v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0247.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Simmons, Vincent; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Avoyelles, 12th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 77-CR-37596; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CW 11-00608.

Denied. Repetitive. Cf. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4(D).

KNOLL, J., recused.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Garrett John BARTON v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0248.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Barton, Garrett John; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. 3, No. 277,347; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 46,-792-KA.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 926(A); La. C.Cr.P. art. 930.3; State ex rel. Melinie v. State, 93-1380 (La.1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Corneilous WHEELER v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0249.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Wheeler, Corneilous; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. Mary, 16th Judicial District Court Div. F, No. 08-177417; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2011 KW 0193.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Jerome JONES v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0250.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Jones, Jerome; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. H, No. 484-797; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-K-1807. Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Michael P. LONG v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0251.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Long, Michael P.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. L, No. 09-6180; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, Nos. 11-KA-313, ll-KA-314.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Marquel JONES v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0252.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Jones, Marquel; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Ascension, 23rd Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 20-328; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2011-KW-1830.

Denied.


text:
    Randell ORANGE v. James LeBLANC, Secretary of the Department of Public Safety and Corrections.
    No. 2012-CI-0256.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Orange, Randell; — Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 584,172; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2011 CA 1084.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Charles Edward BOYD v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0276.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Boyd, Charles Edward; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. F, No. 95-6946; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 09-WR-1116.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Joe SMITH, Jr. v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0277.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Smith Jr., Joe; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Madison, 6th Judicial District Court Div. A, Nos. 47,724, 47,725; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 47,112-KH.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.


text:
    Ronnie WILLIAMS v. STATE of Louisiana BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLE.
    No. 2012-0-0278.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Williams, Ronnie; — Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. E, No. 591-803; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2011 CA 0495.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Roseann KLUMPP v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0302.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Klumpp, Roseann; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson Davis, 31st Judicial District Court Div. O, No. CR-908-08; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KH-11-01558.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Dervol ZENO v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0303.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Zeno, Dervol; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. Charles, 29th Judicial District Court Div. E, No. 09-740; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. ll-KH-1105.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Wardell K. JONES v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0304.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Jones, Wardell K; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Ouachita, 4th Judicial District Court Div. B, Nos. 08-F-0300, 08-F-1778; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 47185-KH.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189; State v. Parker, 98-0256 (La.5/8/98), 711 So.2d 694; State ex rel. Melinie v. State, 93-1380 (La.1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172.

CLARK, J., recused.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Larry John SNYDER, Jr. v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0305.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Snyder Jr., Larry John; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Pointe Coupee, 18th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 75, 430-F; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2011 KA 0770.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Alvin MEAD v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0312.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Mead, Alvin; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. H, No. 395-920; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-K-1799.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Alvin MEAD v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0313.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Mead, Alvin; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. J, No. 363-286; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-K-1798.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189; State ex rel. Melinie v. State, 93-1380 (La.1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172.


text:
    STATE ex rel. James MARCHAND v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0314.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Marchand, James; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 10-97-0220; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2011 KW1912.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189; State v. Parker, 98-0256 (La.5/8/98), 711 So.2d 694.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Elrick P. FORET, Sr. v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0315.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Foret Sr., Elrick P.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Terrebonne, 32nd Judicial District Court Div. E, No. 05-FELY-459,223; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2011 KW1754.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Ricky KING v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0316.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re King, Ricky; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. H, No. 415-236; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-K-1801.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3; State ex rel. Melinie v. State, 93-1380 (La.1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Roosevelt SMALL v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0320.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Small, Roosevelt; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 171,016; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 47,-142-KH.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Patrick J. DUCRE v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0321.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Ducre, Patrick J.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 429638; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2011 KW 1980.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. George D. STEGEMAN v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0322.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Stegeman, George D.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. H, No. 00-6510; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 09-WR-520.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Steven H. HARRCHE v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0342.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Harrche, Steven H.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. H, No. 09-2782; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 11-KA-183.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Michael RHODES v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0343.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Rhodes, Michael; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Bienville, 2nd Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 30,870; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 47,-004-KH.

Denied.


text:
    Dwaine PEADEN a/k/a Dwayne Peaden v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0344.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Dwaine Peaden a/k/a Dwayne Peaden; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. F, No. 447-700; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-K-1758.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189; State v. Parker, 98-0256 (La.5/8/98), 711 So.2d 694; State ex rel. Melinie v. State, 93-1380 (La.1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Charles ALLEN v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0346.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Allen, Charles; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. J, No. 03-6803; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, Nos. 11-KH-769, ll-KH-1024.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. James N. DEATON, III v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0347.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Deaton III, James N.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 234,117; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 47072-KH.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Herman BELLA v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0348.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Bella, Herman; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Terrebonne, 32nd Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 477,341; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2011 KW 1928.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Terrence G. MUNSON v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0354.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Munson, Terrence G.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 09-3218; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 11-KA-81.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Rene DAIRIES v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0358.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Dairies, Rene; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. G, No. 317-050; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-K-1768.

Denied. Repetitive and untimely. Cf. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4(A); La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Brett T. BERGERON v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0359.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Bergeron, Brett T.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. F, No. 469-055; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2012-K-0113.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4(E); La. C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.


text:
    STATE ex rel. George KING v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0382.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re King, George; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. G, No. 98-5179; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, Nos. 08-WR-1121, 09-KH-73.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3; State ex rel. Melinie v. State, 93-1380 (La.1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172; La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4(A).


text:
    STATE ex rel. Rufus HENRY v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0384.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Henry, Rufus; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. Landry, 27th Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 91K-0046; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KH 11-01280.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Aaron MORRIS v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0385.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Morris, Aaron; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. L, No. 99-1589; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 11-KH-1100.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Bernard RICARDO v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0397.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   IN RE Ricardo, Bernard; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. F, No. 297-031; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2012-K-0083.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Richard LAY v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0398.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Lay, Richard; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Claiborne, 2nd Judicial District Court Div. A; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 47181-KH.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.

WEIMER, J„ recused.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Terry D. HARRIS v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0401.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Harris, Terry D.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. I, No. 04-6108; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 11-KA-253.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Kenneth E. AINSWORTH v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0411.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Ainsworth, Kenneth E.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Vernon, 30th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 52,537; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KH 11-00890.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Roseann KLUMPP v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0444.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Klumpp, Roseann; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson Davis, 31st Judicial District Court Div. O, No. CR908-08; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KH 11-01558.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Earl Blake YOUNG v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0458.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Young, Earl Blake; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Pointe Coupee, 18th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 67,612; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2011 KW 2311.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3; State ex rel. Melinie v. State, 93-1380 (La.1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172. See also State v. Cotton, 09-2397 (La.10/15/10), 45 So.3d 1030; State v. Thomas, 08-2912, (La.10/16/09), 19 So.3d 466. Cf. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4(A).


text:
    STATE ex rel. Clarence DUDLEY v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0473.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Dudley, Clarence; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. L, No. 04-02-0314; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2011 KW 2074.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189; La.C.Cr.P. art. 351.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Brian Lee ARCHULETTA v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0474.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Archuletta, Brian Lee; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Washington, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. G, No. 03-CR8-88211; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2011 KW 2236.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Robert WILLIAMS v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0479.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Williams, Robert; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of West Feliciana, 20th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 11-WCR-449; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2011 CW 2001.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Bruce Edward ROBINSON v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0487.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Robinson, Bruce Edward; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. 5, No. 275,278; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 46,-737-KA.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Kerry ROLLINS v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0488.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Rollins, Kerry; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Terrebonne, 32nd Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 321,031; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2011 KW 2107.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189; State v. Parker, 98-0256 (La.5/8/98), 711 So.2d 694; La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3; State ex rel Melinie v. State, 93-1380 (La.1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Elmeco M. BURNES v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0491.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Burnes, Elmeco M.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. Bernard, 34th Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 294-512; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-K-1383.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Mark Q. TAYLOR, Jr. v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0532.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Taylor Jr., Mark Q.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. G, No. 97-374; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 12-KH-66.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189; State v. Parker, 98-0256 (La.5/8/98), 711 So.2d 694; La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3; State ex rel Melinie v. State, 93-1380 (La.1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172; La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4(D).


text:
    STATE ex rel. Gary Van SIMS v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0533.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 22, 2012.
   In re Sims, Gary Van; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory, and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Claiborne, 2nd Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 16,218; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 47192-KH.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189; State v. Parker, 98-0256 (La.5/8/98), 711 So.2d 694; La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3; State ex rel. Melinie v. State, 93-1380 (La.1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172; La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4(D).


text:
    STATE of Louisiana v. Gerard MARTIN, et al.
    No. 2012-KD-1910.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 24, 2012.
   In re State of Louisiana; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. F, No. 504-210; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 12-K-1256.

Stay denied. Writ denied.

VICTORY, J., would grant.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Harold HILL v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0820.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Sept. 14, 2012.
   In re Hill, Harold; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Richland, 5th Judicial District Court Div. A, Nos. 33,378, 33,377.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Ranji COTTON v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0825.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Sept. 14, 2012.
   In re Cotton, Ranji; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. H, No. 04-2963; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 12-KH-106.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189; State v. Parker, 98-0256 (La.5/8/98), 711 So.2d 694; La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3; State ex rel Melinie v. State, 93-1380 (La.1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Marvin COBB v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0826.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Sept. 14, 2012.
   In re Cobb, Marvin; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 187037; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2011 KW 2302.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P, art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2380 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189; State v. Parker, 98-0256 (La.5/8/98), 711 So.2d 694; La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3; State ex rel Melinie v. State, 93-1380 (La.1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172.


text:
    STATE of Louisiana v. Berry CHANDLER.
    No. 2012-OK-0844.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Sept. 14, 2012.
   In re Chandler, Berry; — Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Ouachita, 4th Judicial District Court Div. K, No. 04-M 3027-2, 04-M 3028-2, 04M 3029-2 & 01-F 0230-2.

Denied.

CLARK, J., recused.


text:
    STATE of Louisiana v. Rocky Joseph LEONE.
    No. 2012-KP-0849.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Sept. 14, 2012.
   In re Leone, Rocky Joseph; — Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 256904; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 47,275-KW.

Denied.


text:
    Randy HUGHES v. Timothy KEITH, Warden, Winn Correctional Center, State of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KP-0854.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Sept. 14, 2012.
   In re Hughes, Randy; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. M, No. 08-1437; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 12-KH-143.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Richard F. SMITH v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0858.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Sept. 14, 2012.
   In re Smith, Richard F.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Bossier, 26th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 169,018; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 46,-962-KH.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Vernon Ray HOWARD v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0864.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Sept. 14, 2012.
   In re Howard, Vernon Ray; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. 4, No. 160,612; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 47,-297-KH.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189; State v. Parker, 98-0256 (La.5/8/98), 711 So.2d 694; La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3; State ex rel Melinie v. State, 93-1380 (La.1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Dwayne BROWN v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0877.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Sept. 14, 2012.
   In re Brown, Dwayne; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. D, No. 371-749; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2012-K-0160.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Edward George CREAUX v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0926.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Sept. 14, 2012.
   In re Creaux, Edward George; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of West Feliciana, 20th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 12-WCR-153.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.


text:
    STATE ex rel. David SOSA, Jr. v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0936.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Sept. 14, 2012.
   In re Sosa Jr., David; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. F, No. 392,182; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2012 KW 0301.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Vincent Mark CASTILLO v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0939.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Sept. 14, 2012.
   In re Castillo, Vincent Mark; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Divs. J, F, Nos. 12-344, 12-270,12-0344; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, Nos. 12-K-250, 12-K-273, 12-K-170.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Darren JACKSON v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0953.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Sept. 14, 2012.
   In re Jackson, Darren; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. 5, No. 273,551; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 47,-271-KH.

Denied.


text:
    State ex rel. Alan GUY v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0954.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Sept. 14, 2012.
   In re Guy, Alan; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. D, No. 313-214; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2012-K-0126.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Darryl ROBINSON v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0955.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Sept. 14, 2012.
   In re Robinson, Darryl; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. I, No. 375-936; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2012-K-0401.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Chris POLIZZI v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0981.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Sept. 14, 2012.
   In re Polizzi, Chris; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. N, No. 03-5248; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 12-KH-201.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Randean J. HENRY v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0983.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Sept. 14, 2012.
   In re Henry, Randean J.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Lafourche, 17th Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 286250; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2012 KW 0030.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.

WEIMER, J., recused.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Joseph I. SMITH v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0323.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Sept. 14, 2012.
   In re Smith, Joseph I.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. I, Nos. 478-706, 478-717; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-K-1803.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Marvin WILEY v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2012-KH-0759.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Sept. 14, 2012.
   In re Wiley, Marvin; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Terrebonne, 32nd Judicial District Court Div. C, Nos. 312,770, 331,-135; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2011 KW 2387.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.