source: Caselaw Access Project

license: Public Domain

text:
    STATE of Louisiana v. Pressley REED.
    No. 2011-KK-0567.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 18, 2011.
   In re Reed, Pressley; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. G, No. 481-881; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-K-0345.

Denied.


text:
    STATE of Louisiana v. Debra Hewitt SCHJENKEN.
    No. 2011-KK-0573.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 21, 2011.
   In re Schjenken, Debra Hewitt; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Lafayette, 15th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 129172.1; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 11 00261-KH.

Denied.


text:
    STATE of Louisiana v. Dohntel WILLIAMS.
    No. 2011-KK-0480.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 21, 2011.
   In re Williams, Dohntel; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. P, No. 10-2494; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 11-K-98.

Denied.


text:
    STATE of Louisiana v. Eugene VESSEL.
    No. 2011-KK-0549.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 21, 2011.
   In re Vessel, Eugene; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. L, No. 472-499; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-K-0254.

Stay denied; writ denied.


text:
    STATE of Louisiana v. Greg HARRIS.
    No. 2011-KK-0581.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 22, 2011.
   In re Harris, Greg; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. J, No. 3-09-0429; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2011 KW 0508.

Stay denied; writ denied.


text:
    Kevin J. BIANCHINI, PH.D., A.B.P.N. v. John J. MUGGIVAN.
    No. 2011-CC-0413.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 23, 2011.
   In re Muggivan, John J.; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 626-507; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 10-C-1006.

Denied.

VICTORY and CLARK, JJ., would grant.


text:
    CENTRAL PROGRESSIVE BANK v. GRAND OAKS DEVELOPMENT, LLC, Marina Developers, LLC, John J. Ploue, III, James G. Coate, Jr. Central Progressive Bank v. Marina Developers, LLC, James G. Coate, Jr. and John J. Ploue, III.
    No. 2011-CC-0596.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 23, 2011.
   In re Coate Jr., James G.; Grand Oaks Development LLC et al.; Marina Developers LLC; Ploue III, John J.; — Defendants); Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. E, Nos. 2009-11793, 2009-12127; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2011 CW 0433.

Denied.


text:
    STATE of Louisiana v. Isaiah DOYLE.
    No. 2011-KK-0599.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 23, 2011.
   In re State of Louisiana; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedíal Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 05-5262; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 11-K-306.

Denied.


text:
    Justo E. ROQUE, Jr. v. Miguel A. ELLAS, A Professional Law Corporation.
    No. 2010-OC-2420.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Roque, Jr., Justo E.; —Plaintiff; Applying for a Second Reconsideration of this Court’s action dated December 17, 2010 and January 28, 2011; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. P, No. 670-351; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 10-C-340.

Second application for reconsideration not considered. Judgment is final. See La.CodeCiv.P. art. 2167. No further filings shall be accepted in this matter.


text:
    Mary JAGNEAUX v. LAFAYETTE CITY-PARISH CONSOLIDATED GOVERNMENT et al.
    No. 2010-CC-2634.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Lafayette City-Parish Consolidated Government; —Defendants; Applying for Reconsideration of this Court’s action dated January 28, 2011; Parish of Lafayette, 15th Judicial District Court Div. E, No. 2008-5013; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CW 10-00858.

Reconsideration granted for the sole purpose of correcting our January 28, 2011 order to read: “Not considered. Not timely filed. See Supreme Court Rule X, Section 5(d).” In all other respects, the application for reconsideration is denied.


text:
    STATE of Louisiana v. Donald L. DIXON.
    No. 2010-KP-1905.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re State of Louisiana; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. F, No. 105-3310; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 10-KH-573.

Granted. Because relator’s application for writs on direct review was not filed within the statutory delay period, see La. C.Cr.P. art. 922(B); La.S.Ct.R.X Section 5, his conviction and sentence became final on March 25, 2008. Relator’s application for post-conviction relief, filed on March 29, 2010, is therefore time-barred by La. C.Cr .P. art. 930.8. See State ex rel. Hall v. State, 99-0326 (La.9/24/99), 871 So.2d 1071. Accordingly, the Fifth Circuit’s ruling remanding the case for consideration is reversed and the district court’s ruling dismissing the application as untimely filed is reinstated.

JOHNSON, J., would deny.


text:
    In re Appeal of the DECISION OF the DISCIPLINARY BOARD NO. 10-PDB-066.
    No. 2011-OB-0042.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Franklin, Althenetia Baptiste; — Plaintiff; Applying For Appeal of Decision of the Disciplinary Board Office of Disciplinary Board, No. 10-PDB-066.

Leave to appeal denied.


text:
    In re Appeal of the DECISION OF the DISCIPLINARY BOARD NO. 10-PDB-087.
    No. 2011-OB-0053.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Jones, Herbert T.; —Plaintiff; Applying For Appeal of Decision of the Disciplinary Board Office of Disciplinary Board, No. 10-PDB-087.

Leave to appeal denied.


text:
    In re Appeal of the DECISION OF the DISCIPLINARY BOARD NO. 08-PDB-084.
    No. 2011-OB-0215.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Aikens, David; —Plaintiff; Applying For Appeal of Decision of the Disciplinary Board Office of Disciplinary Board, No. 08-PDB-084.

Denied. See In re: Appeal of Decision of Disciplinary Board No. 08-PDB-084, 09-0445 (La.5/22/09), 9 So.3d 132.


text:
    STATE of Louisiana v. Mark B. BRIGNAC.
    No. 2010-K-2513.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re State of Louisiana; —Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of St. Martin, 16th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 06-231568; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KA 10-276.

Not considered, not timely filed.


text:
    Charles T. CRAIG and Bobbie J. Crnkovic v. CAPPAERT MANUFACTURED HOUSING, et al.
    No. 2011-CC-0237.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Craig, Charles T. et al.; Crnkovic, Bobbie J.; —Plaintiff(s); Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Rapides, 9th Judicial District Court Div. F, No. 236,938; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CW 10-01199.

Not considered. Not timely filed. See Supreme Court Rule X, Section 5. Defendants’ motions to dismiss are denied as moot.


text:
    Charles T. CRAIG and Bobbie J. Crnkovic v. CAPPAERT MANUFACTURED HOUSING, et al.
    No. 2011-CC-0238.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Craig, Charles T. et al.; Crnkovic, Bobbie J.; —Plaintiff(s); Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Rapides, 9th Judicial District Court Div. F, No. 236,938; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CW 10-01269.

Not considered. Not timely filed. See Supreme Court Rule X, Section 5. Defendants’ motions to dismiss are denied as moot.


text:
    Shaneka Merrell CROKETT Individually and on Behalf of her Deceased Husband, Michael Crockett and their Minor Children, M.C. and K.C., and as Provisional Tutrix of D.J.D., T.D.C. and K.J.C. and the Estate of Michael Crockett v. THERRAL STORY WELL SERVICE, INC., et al.
    No. 2011-C-0263.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re C, K; C., K. J.; C., M.; C., T. D.; Crockett, Estate of Michael; Crockett, Shaneka Merrell et al.; D., D. J.; — Plaintiff(s); Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Webster, 26th Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 68559-C; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 45,716-CA.

Not considered, hot timely filed.


text:
    Marvin GORMAN v. Dr. Daniel FREY, et al.
    No. 2010-CC-2626.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Frey, Dr. Daniel et al.; Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center; State of Louisiana; —Defendants; Applying for Reconsideration of this Court’s action dated January 28, 2011; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. B, Nos. 07-221, 08-13120; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-0771.

Not considered. See Louisiana Supreme Court Rule IX, Section 6.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Ruchell MAGEE v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2010-KH-0297.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Magee, Ruchell; —Plaintiff; Applying for Reconsideration of this Court’s Action, dated February 4, 2011; Parish of Washington, 22nd Judicial District Court, Div. A, No. 10,755.

Denied.


text:
    STATE of Louisiana v. John ANDERSON.
    No. 2010-KP-656.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Anderson, John.; —Plaintiff; Applying for Reconsideration of this Court’s Action dated December 10, 2010; Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. A, No. 08-02-0706; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2009 KW 1319.

Reconsideration denied.


text:
    STATE of Louisiana v. Gregory BRIGHT and Earl Truvia.
    No. 2010-KK-2709.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re State of Louisiana, applying for Reconsideration to this court’s action dated February 04, 2011, from the Criminal District Court, Parish of Orleans, No. 487-447, Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal, No. 2020-K-0976.

Reconsideration denied.


text:
    In Reference to the INTERDICTION OF Jeannette Weadd JONES.
    No. 2010-CC-2738.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Carter, Marybelle Jones et al.; Jones, Cynthia; Hills, Claudette Jones; — Others; Applying for Reconsideration of this Court’s action dated February 4, 2011; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. G, No. 2008-6929; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 10-CA-66.

Reconsideration denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Stanley COSTON v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2006-KH-2358.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Coston, Stanley; —Plaintiff; Applying for Motion to Enforce this Court’s Order dated December 15, 2006; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. E, No. 403-628; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2006-K-1018.

Denied. Moot. The district court has acted


text:
    STATE ex rel. Bruce STIPE v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2010-KH-2239.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Stipe, Bruce; ■ — Plaintiff; Applying for a Motion to Enforce this Court’s action dated October 8, 2010; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. E, No. 365-980; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-K-1098.

Denied.


text:
    Allen WASHINGTON and Sandra Washington Individually and on Behalf of their Minor Children: Allen Washington, Jr., Samantha Washington, and Allandra Washington v. STATE of Louisiana through the DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT, Jermaine Brisco, Bayou Steel Corporation, and ABC Insurance Company.
    No. 2011-CC-0290.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re State of Louisiana through the Department of Transportation and Development; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. Charles, 29th Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 60,176; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 10-C-903.

Stay denied; writ denied.


text:
    Alicia PLUMMER, et al. v. The CITY OF NEW ORLEANS, et al.
    No. 2011-CC-0352.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re City of New Orleans, et al.; Lan-drieu, Mayor, Mitchell J.; —Defendant(s); Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. C, No. 2010-8235; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-C-0201.

Stay denied; writ denied.

JOHNSON, J., recused.


text:
    STATE of Louisiana v. Majuangy D. EVANS.
    No. 2010-KO-0363.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Evans, Majuangy D.; —Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Jefferson, 24th’ Judicial District Court Div. N, No. 01-1569; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 09-KA-477.

Denied.


text:
    Charles CUTLER v. PAROLE BOARD.
    No. 2010-CI-0554.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Cutler, Charles; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. M, No. 574,188; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2009 CA 1268.

Denied.


text:
    Rannell CRAIG v. Burl CAIN, Warden, L.S.P.
    No. 2010-CI-0610.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Craig, Rannell; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. O, No. 545,409; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2009 CA 1103.

Denied.


text:
    Kevin JARRELL v. Ivy MORRIS, et al., Corrections Records Manager II, Rayburn Correctional Center, Linda Ramsay, et al., Secretary’s Designee, Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections.
    No. 2010-CI-0612.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Jarrell, Kevin; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. O, No. 535,046; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2009 CA 1289.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. James THOMAS, Sr. v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2010-KH-0644.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Thomas Sr., James; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Ascension, 23rd Judicial District Court Div. E, No. 14749; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2009 KA 2161.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Charles JONES v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2010-KH-0645.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Jones, Charles; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 02-04-0400; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2009 KW 2079.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Earton SMITH v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2010-KH-0657.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Smith, Earton; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Bossier, 26th Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 88,226; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 45,400-KH.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La.9/5/95, 660 So.2d 1189)., 660 So.2d 1189; State v. Parker, 98-0256 (La.5/8/98), 711 So.2d 694.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Crayton JONES, Jr. v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2010-KH-0659.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Jones Jr., Crayton; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Sabine, 11th Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 60,490; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KA 09-751.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Phillip BROWN v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2010-KH-0660.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Brown, Phillip; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. E, No. 225,722; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 45,426-KH.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Charles W. DEAL v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2010-KH-0662.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Deal, Charles W.; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Rapides, 9th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 285,138; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KH 09-01156.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. James M. DOYLE v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2010-KH-669.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Doyle, James M.; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 254,880; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 45/419-KH.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Robert HUDSON v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2010-KH-0672.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Hudson, Robert; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 03-03-0357; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2009 KW 2245.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Donald ROSS v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2010-KH-0673.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Ross, Donald; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Assumption, 23rd Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 88-67; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2009 KW 2244.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Reginald Rayshaun TURNER. v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2010-KH-0680.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Turner, Reginald Rayshaun; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of West Carroll, 5th Judicial District Court Div. A, Nos. F2007060, F2009017; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Nos. 44,920-KA, 44,921-KA.

Denied.


text:
    Robert JACKSON, III v. James K. LEBLANC, Sec. of Dept. of Pub. Safety & Corr.; Dept. of Pub. Safety & Corr.
    No. 2010-CI-0682.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Jackson III, Robert; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. F, No. 567,652; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2009 CA 1131.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Percy, ALLEN v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2010-KH-0686.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Allen, Percy; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. F, No. 474-262; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2009-KA-0813.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Samuel KELLY v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2010-KH-0693.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Kelly, Samuel; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. F, No. 98-4959; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 09-WR-495.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Rance DUNBAR v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2010-KH-0694.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Dunbar, Ranee; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. F, No. 456-998; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-K-0259.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Levell DOUGHTY v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2010-KH-0696.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Doughty, Leyell; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. C, No. 449-694; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2009-K-1511.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Troy A. GRANT v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2010-KH-0698.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Grant, Troy A.; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of W. Baton Rouge, 18th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 002002; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 KW 0183.

Denied.


text:
    STATE of Louisiana v. Nolan JAMES.
    No. 2010-KP-1675.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re James, Nolan; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Ascension, 23rd Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 402; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 KW 0463.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Nolan JAMES v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2010-KH-1716.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re James, Nolan; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Ascension, 23rd Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 402; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 KW 0463.

Denied.


text:
    STATE of Louisiana v. Logan LOUVIERE.
    No. 2010-KP-1747.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Louviere, Logan; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Iberia, 16th Judicial District Court Div. H, No. 07-2158; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KW 10-358.

Denied.


text:
    STATE of Louisiana v. Duane LUMINAIS.
    No. 2010-KP-1780.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Luminais, Duane; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 033-2083; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 10-KH-408.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189. Cf. State v. Parker, 98-0256 (La.5/8/98), 711 So.2d 694, 695 (“late realization that an error may have occurred ... does not qualify as the discovery of a new fact for purposes of the exception set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8(A).”).


text:
    STATE of Louisiana v. Ted ADDISON.
    No. 2010-KP-1787.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Addison, Ted; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. F, No. 99-7325; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, Nos. 08-KH-688, 08-WR-1142, 09-KH-919.

Denied.


text:
    STATE of Louisiana v. Brian Ray BATISTE.
    No. 2010-KP-1812.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Batiste, Brian Ray; —-Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. James, 23rd Judicial District Court Div. O, No. 4,064; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 10-KH-502.

Denied.


text:
    STATE of Louisiana v. Vincent MARINELLO.
    No. 2010-K-2494.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Marinello, Vincent; —Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Lafayette, 15th Judicial District Court Div. H, No. 119805; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 09-1260.

Denied.


text:
    STATE of Louisiana v. Aubrey William SIKES.
    No. 2010-KO-2528.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Sikes, Aubrey William; —Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Tangipahoa, 21st Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 801482; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 KA 0341.

Denied.


text:
    STATE of Louisiana v. Charles D. WASHINGTON.
    No. 2010-KO-2533.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Washington, Charles D.; —Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Concordia, 7th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 08-309; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 10-53.

Denied.


text:
    STATE of Louisiana v. Vincent MARINELLO.
    No. 2010-KO-2534.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Marinello, Vincent; —Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Lafayette, 15th Judicial District Court Div. H, No. CR 119805; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 09-1260.

Denied.


text:
    REDAR, LLC, et al. v. Warren D. RUSH, et al.
    No. 2010-C-2784.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Rader Family Qualified Personal Residence Trust; Rader Sr., Norris; Rader, Patsy Marsalis; Redar LLC et al.; — Plaintiff(s); Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Palish of Iberia, 16th Judicial District Court Div. D, Nos. 108,435, 109,644; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Nos. 09-1417, 10-46.

Denied.


text:
    Nancy C. BRAZIL, Wife of/and Charles M. Brazil v. WAL-MART LOUISIANA, LLC and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., et al.
    No. 2010-CC-2816.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In Re Brazil et al., Nancy C.; Brazil, Charles M.; —Plaintiffis); Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 2008-14500; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 CW 1665.

Denied.


text:
    REDAR, LLC, et al. v. Warren D. RUSH, et al.
    No. 2010-C-2832.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Rush, Warren D. et al.; —Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Iberia, 16th Judicial District Court Div. D, Nos. 109,644, 108,435; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Nos. 09-1417, 10-46, 10-308.

Denied.


text:
    REDAR, LLC, et al. v. Warren D. RUSH, et al.
    No. 2010-C-2833.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Iberia Enterprises LLC; St. Lafayette Properties LLC; —Defendant(s); Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Iberia, 16th Judicial District Court Div. D, Nos. 108,435, 109,644; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Nos. 09-1417, 10-308, 10-46.

Denied.


text:
    REDAR, LLC, et al v. Warren D. RUSH, et al.
    No. 2010-C-2869.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Rush Rush & Calogero; Rush, Warren D. et al.; —Defendant(s); Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Iberia, 16th Judicial District Court Div. D, Nos. 109,644, 108,435; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Nos. 09-1417, 10-46, 10-308.

Denied.


text:
    Cheryl F. BENOIT v. ACE TRANSPORTATION.
    No. 2011-C-0014.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Ace Transportation et al.; Liberty Mutual Ins. Co.; —Defendant(s); Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review Office of Workers’ Compensation District 04, No. 07-05989; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 10-371.

Denied.

VICTORY, J., would grant.


text:
    Gloria M. NED, Individually, et al. v. UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION, et al. Retha Herbert, et al. v. Union Pacific Corporation, et al. Edward Aaron, Individually, et al. v. Union Pacific Corporation, et al. James Adams Beloney, et al. v. Union Pacific Corporation, et al. Lionel Thibodeaux, et al. v. Union Pacific Corporation, et al.
    No. 2011-CC-0055.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re A.L. Greathouse; Brown, Tommy G.; Dallas States; PPG Industries Inc.; Union Pacific Corp. et al.; Union Pacific Railroad Corp.; W.J. Peard; —Defendants); Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Calcasieu, 14th Judicial District Court Div. D, Nos. 2003-001100, 2003-001101, 2003-001102, 2003-001106, 2003-001107; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CW 10-01179;

Denied. Given the current procedural posture of the case, we decline to exercise our supervisory jurisdiction at this time. Defendants will have an adequate opportunity to re-urge their exception at a later stage of the proceeding, or on appeal in the event of an adverse judgment.

VICTORY and GUIDRY, JJ., would grant.


text:
    Kenneth DUPLECHAIN, et al. v. Firooz JALILI, et al.
    No. 2011-C-0087.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Louisiana Patient’s Compensation Fund; —Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Lafayette, 15th Judicial District Court Div. I, No. 2006-3905-C; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 10-736.

Denied.

VICTORY, J., would grant.


text:
    ULLAH, INC. v. LAFAYETTE INSURANCE COMPANY.
    No. 2011-C-0100.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Lafayette Insurance Company; — Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of St. Bernard, 34th Judicial District Court Div. E, No. 109-486; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2009-CA-1566.

Denied.

VICTORY, J., would grant.


text:
    ULLAH, INC. v. LAFAYETTE INSURANCE COMPANY.
    No. 2011-C-0134.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Ullah Inc.; —Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of St. Bernard, 34th Judicial District Court Div. E, No. 109-486; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2009-CA-1566.

Denied.

VICTORY, J., would grant.


text:
    ARABIE TRANSPORT, L.L.C. v. REEVES DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C.
    No. 2011-CC-0151.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Arable Transport L.L.C; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Calcasieu, Lake Charles City Court, No. 10-1164; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CW 10-01272.

Denied.


text:
    Maria RODRIGUEZ, as Administratrix of the Estate of Emma ARREZOLA, Brenda Arrezola, individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Carlos Jesus Lana and Alfredo Robledo, Sr., as Administrator of the Estate of Alfredo Robledo, Jr. v. Maria RODRIGUEZ, Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Jamie L. Housewright, Pine Belt Transportation, LLC., Steve E. Cooper and ABC Insurance Company.
    No. 2011-CC-0152.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Arrezola, Brenda; Arrezola, Estate of Emma; Lana, Estate of Carlos Jesus; Robledo Jr., Estate of Alfredo; Robledo Sr., Alfredo; Rodriguez, Maria et al.; —Plaintiff(s); Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Tangipahoa, 21st Judicial District Court Div. E, No. 2009-0003765; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 CW 1859.

Denied.


text:
    STATE of Louisiana v. Donovan BARKER.
    No. 2011-KK-0153.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Barker, Donovan; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedíal Writs, Parish of St. Charles, 29th Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 10-0476; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 10-K-938.

Denied.


text:
    Darrel Grant LEDEE v. Myrtle HARDWELL, Nicole Walker, Phoebe Taylor, Brenda Turner, Carlton Brown, Michelle Kennedy, Pat Thomas, Tommy Glover, Ronald E. Corkern, Jr., Sandy Taylor, Mona Heyse, Timothy Wilkinson, Angel Martin, Gwendolyn Powell, R. Williams, Corrections Corporation of America, Assistant Secretary of Adult Services-Louisiana Dept. of Corrections and Louisiana Dept. of Corrections.
    No. 2011-CP-0159.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re LeDee, Darrel Grant; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Winn, 8th Judicial District Court Div. 0, No. 42,177; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 45,932-CW.

Denied.


text:
    Deneen SMITH v. Dr. Gregg WILLIAMS.
    No. 2011-CC-0167.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Williams Dr., Gregg; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 675-653; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 10-C-20.

Denied.


text:
    STATE of Louisiana v. Waco D. COLLINS.
    No. 2011-KK-0168.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re State of Louisiana; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. 5, No. 282,372; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 45,979-KW.

Denied.


text:
    Bridgette Gravois ORTEGA v. Koury J. ORTEGA.
    No. 2011-C-0170.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Ortega, Bridgette Gravois; -Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of St. Mary, 16th Judicial District Court Div. F, No. 120334; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 CA 1003.

Denied.


text:
    SKYLINE MANAGEMENT, INC. v. MARION A. ALLEN, INC. OF GEORGIA d/b/a The Allen Group, Marion A. Allen, Inc. of Louisiana and Marion A. Allen.
    No. 2011-C-0171.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Allen, Marion A.; Marion A. Allen, Inc. of Georgia, et al.; The Allen Group;— Defendant(s); Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 99-14856; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 CA 1294.

Denied.


text:
    Lauren SELF, Individually and On Behalf of Her Minor Son, Trent Ledet v. CHICK-FIL-A, INC. and Shannon Lewis.
    No. 2011-C-0174.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Self, Lauren et al.; —Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Terrebonne, 32nd Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 149,383; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 CA 1070.

Denied.


text:
    Ramona SCOTT, Wife of/and Cedrig Scott, Sr., Individually and as Natural Tutors of the Minor, Cedric Scott, Jr. v. LEONARD J. CHABERT MEDICAL CENTER, Through Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Dr. Fadi Naddour.
    No. 2011-C-0175.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Scott Sr., Cedric; Scott, Ramona et al.; —Plaintiff(s); Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Terrebonne, 32nd Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 136713; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 CA 0192.

Denied.


text:
    PLEASURE BEACH, L.L.C. v. Darryl SMITH.
    No. 2011-C-0179.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Smith, Darryl; —Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. G, Nos. 2005-14552,; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Nos. 2010 CA 0238, 2010 CA 0826.

Denied.


text:
    Tim WAGNER v. INN OF LAKE CHARLES, et al.
    No. 2011-C-0181.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Wagner, Tim; —Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Calcasieu, 14th Judicial District Court Div. H, No. 2008-1158-H; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 10-0017.

Denied.


text:
    Floyd P. DONLEY, Sr. v. Charles REID.
    No. 2011-C-0208.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Donley St., Floyd P.; —Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Tangipahoa, 21st Judicial District Court Div. F, No. 2009-0004169F; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 CA 1217.

Denied.


text:
    STATE of Louisiana v. Earl BRYARS.
    No. 2011-KK-0209.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Bryars, Earl; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. C, No. 487-562; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-K-1517.

Denied.

KNOLL and CLARK, JJ., would grant.


text:
    4140 CANAL STREET, L.L.C v. CITY OF NEW ORLEANS and the New Orleans Historic Landmarks Commission.
    No. 2011-C-0210.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re 4140 Canal Street, L.L.C; —Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. K, No. 2010-3435; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-CA-1038.

Denied.


text:
    STATE of Louisiana v. Sherman REED.
    No. 2011-KK-0211.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Reed, Sherman; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. J, No. 500-218; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-K-1687.

Denied.


text:
    LANDRY’S SEAFOOD HOUSE-NEW ORLEANS, INC. v. The BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF the ORLEANS LEVEE DISTRICT.
    No. 2011-C-0225.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Board of Commissioners of the Orleans Levee District; —Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. B, No. 06-05334; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-CA-1052.

Denied.


text:
    Nathaniel DAVIS v. TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Joy Aucoin, and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company.
    No. 2011-C-0236.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Davis, Nathaniel; —Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Ascension, 23rd Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 76,806; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 CA 1255.

Denied.


text:
    Dejoyce BRUMFIELD; Sandra K. Bridges and Linda Magee. v. Michael G. LIND, United States Fire Insurance Company, John Doe, and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company.
    No. 2011-C-0243.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Bridges, Sandra K.; Brumfield, Dejoyce; —Plaintiff(s); Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. K, No. 2009-4074; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-CA-1011.

Denied.


text:
    STATE of Louisiana v. William HAZZARD.
    No. 2011-KK-0250.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Hazzard, William; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. G, No. 476142; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 KW 2199.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Bernard CAUSEY v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2011-KH-0350.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 25, 2011.
   In re Causey, Bernard; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. G, No. 495-985; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-K-0018.

Denied.


text:
    STATE of Louisiana v. Shane N. TERRY, et al.
    No. 2011-KK-0672.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 4, 2011.
   In re Litzenberger, Robin D.; Terry, Shane N. et al.; —Defendant(s); Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. J, No. 500-600; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-K-0408.

Stay denied; writ denied.


text:
    Lisa S. KIRSCHMAN v. Arnold L. KIRSCHMAN.
    No. 2011-CC-0671.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 4, 2011.
   In re Kirschman, Arnold L.; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. J, No. 2006-6464; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-C-0433.

Stay denied; writ denied.


text:
    STATE of Louisiana v. Tierre R. SMITH.
    No. 2011-KK-0683.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 6, 2011.
   In re State of Louisiana; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. B, No. 501-601; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-K-0303.

Stay denied; writ denied.


text:
    TRANS PACIFIC INTERACTIVE, INC. v. U.S. TELEMETRY CORPORATION; U.S. Telemetry Network, Inc.; U.S. Telemetry-Bakersfield, LLC; Datex Spectrum, LLC; Thomas L. Siebert, K. Steven Roberts, Robert S. Miller, Don M. Clarke, James K. Gable, Charles M. Bruce, John J. Broussard, Henry (Hank) Mills, Clay M. Allen, and Stephen D. Gavin.
    No. 2011-C-0205.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re Gavin, Stephen D.; Patton Boggs LLP; —Defendant(s); Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. E, No. 507714; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 CA 0507.

Granted.


text:
    Geraldine OUBRE and Linda Gentry on their Behalf, as Well as Others Similarly Situated v. LOUISIANA CITIZENS FAIR PLAN.
    No. 2011-C-0097.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re Gentry, Linda; Oubre, Geraldine et al.; —Plaintiff(s); Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. M, No. 625-567; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 09-CA-620.

Granted.


text:
    STATE of Louisiana v. Lynn BESS, III.
    No. 2010-KO-2368.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re Bess III, Lynn; —Defendant; Applying for Reconsideration of this Court’s action dated February 25, 2011; Parish of Ouachita, 4th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 07-F3173; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 45,358-KA.

Denied.


text:
    STATE of Louisiana v. Paul LEBLANC.
    No. 2010-KP-1282.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re LeBlanc, Paul; —Defendant (s); Applying for Reconsideration of this Courts action dated February 4, 2011 Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court, Division B, No. 357107; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 KW 0186.

Reconsideration denied.


text:
    STATE of Louisiana v. John H. COOLEY.
    No. 2010-KP-1209.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re Cooley, John H.; —Defendant (s); Applying for Reconsideration of this Courts action dated February 4, 2011 Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court, Division G, No. 358320; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 KW 0297.

Reconsideration denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Tony Joseph TABOR v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2010-KH-0283.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re Tabor, Tony Joseph; —Defendant (s); Applying for Reconsideration of this Courts action dated February 18, 2011 Parish of Terrebonne, 32nd Judicial District Court, Division E, No. 447,948; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2007 KA 0058.

Denied.


text:
    STATE of Louisiana v. Matthew J. JAMES, Jr. Matthew James, Jr. v. Latasha Y. Davis.
    No. 2011-CJ-0425.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re James Jr., Matthew J.; —Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Ouachita, 4th Judicial District Court Div. A, Nos. 17,320, 18,462, 20001260; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Nos. 45,955-JAC, 45,956-JAC, 45,957-JAC.

Not considered. Not timely filed. See Supreme Court Rule X, Section 5(a) and Section 5(d).


text:
    STATE ex rel. Keith LONDON v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2010-OK-0407.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re London, Keith; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Calcasieu, 14th Judicial District Court Div., No. 20959-07; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 09 01402-KH.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Gary Wayne WOODS v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2010-KH-2034.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re Woods, Gary Wayne — Plaintiff; Applying for Motion to Enforce this Court’s action dated September 7, 2010, Parish of Rapides, 9th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 300,156; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KH 10-00824.

Denied. Moot.


text:
    In re LOUISIANA JUDICIARY COMMISSION NO. 10-7539.
    No. 2010-O-2583.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re Johnson, Elfrida W.; —Plaintiff; Applying for Reconsideration of this Court’s action dated January 7, 2011; Judiciary Commission of Louisiana, No. 10-7539.

Denied.


text:
    APPEAL OF COMPLAINT NO. 26645.
    No. 2010-OB-2459.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re Johnson, Elfrida W.; —Plaintiff; Applying for Reconsideration of this Court’s action dated January 7, 2011; Office of Disciplinary Board, No. 26645.

Denied.


text:
    In re LOUISIANA JUDICIARY COMMISSION NO. 10-7427.
    No. 2010-O-2458.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re Johnson, Elfrida W.; —Plaintiff; Applying for Reconsideration of this Court’s action dated January 7, 2011; Judiciary Commission of Louisiana, No. 10-7427.

Denied.

WEIMER, J., recused.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Charles ALLEN v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2010-KH-0748.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re Allen, Charles; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. J, No. 03-6803; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 10-KH-39.

Denied.

GUIDRY, J., recused.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Cedrick WASHINGTON v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2010-KH-0747.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re Washington, Cedrick; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. F, No. 00-429; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 08-WR-948.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Dominic LEBOUEF v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2010-KH-0746.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re LeBouef, Dominic; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Lafourche, 17th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 301884; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2009 KW 2311.

Denied.

WEIMER, J., recused.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Duong CAO v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2010-KH-0731.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re Cao, Duong; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Terrebonne, 32nd Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 292,445; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2009-KW-2366.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Lionel JACKSON v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2010-KH-0658.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re Jackson, Lionel; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. M, No. 946931; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 08-WR-914.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. David SOSA v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2010-KH-0785.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re Sosa, David; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. F, No. 392182; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2009 KW 2334.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Kevin GOLDSTON v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2010-KH-0778.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re Goldston, Kevin; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. K, No. 430-300; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-K-0125.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189; La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3; State ex rel. Melinie v. State, 93-1380 (La.1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Terrance ANDERSON v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2010-KH-0777.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re Anderson, Terrance; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. H, No. 08-3682; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 10-KH-41.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Richard LANGLEY v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2010-KH-0776.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re Langley, Richard; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. A, No. 359-302; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-K-0318.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189; State v. Parker, 98-0256 (La.5/8/98), 711 So.2d 694; La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3; State ex rel Melinie v. State, 93-1380 (La.1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172. Cf. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4(D).


text:
    STATE ex rel. Kaih JACKSON v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2010-KH-0753.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re Jackson, Kaih; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. F, No. 472-099; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-K-0162.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Russell ALEXANDER v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2010-KH-0856.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re Alexander, Russell; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. Mary, 16th Judicial District Court Div. E, No. 2003-161240.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Harlan A. CYPRIAN v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2010-KH-0852.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re Cyprian, Harlan A.; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. I, No. 345592; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2009 KW 2338.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189; State v. Parker, 98-0256 (La.5/8/98), 711 So.2d 694; La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3; State ex rel Melinie v. State, 93-1380 (La.1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Renata JOLIVETT v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2010-KH-0851.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re Jolivett, Renata; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. P, Nos. 01-4955, GO-6426; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 10-KH-60.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Alexander HYMES v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2010-KH-0788.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re Hymes, Alexander; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedíal Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 00-5096; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 08-WR-970.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. James FAULKIN v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2010-KH-0787.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re Faulkin, James; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. I, No. 378-098; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-K-0157.

Denied.


text:
    Udell LEJEUNE, Jr. v. STATE of Louisiana, DOTD.
    No. 2010-C-1568.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re LeJeune Jr., Udell; —-Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review Office of Workers’ Compensation, District # 03, No. 06-08127; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 10-121.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Norris MOTEN v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2010-KH-0877.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re Moten, Norris; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. B, No. 320-387; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-K-0189.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189. Cf. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4(D).


text:
    STATE ex rel. Rashad POCHE v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2010-KH-0876.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re Poche, Rashad; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Ascension, 23rd Judicial District Court Div. A, Nos. 21510, 21509; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2009-KA-0007.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Jamal CHAPMAN v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2010-KH-0872.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re Chapman, Jamal R.; -Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Terrebonne, 32nd Judicial District Court Div. E, Nos. 477337, 477072; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2009 KW 2303.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Raymond BLACHER v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2010-KH-0786.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re Blacher, Raymond; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. G, No. 4-99-795; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 KW 0047.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189; State v. Parker, 98-0256 (La.5/8/98), 711 So.2d 694; La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3; State ex rel Melinie v. State, 93-1380 (La.1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172. Cf. La. C.Cr.P. art. 930.4(D).


text:
    STATE of Louisiana v. Alfred DECLOUET.
    No. 2010-K-2556.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re Declouet, Alfred; —Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. H, No. 07-1540; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 09-KA-1046.

Denied.


text:
    STATE of Louisiana v. Kashie FERNANDEZ.
    No. 2010-KO-2536.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re Fernandez, Kashie; —Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. I, No. 480-784; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2009-KA-1727.

Denied.


text:
    STATE of Louisiana v. Ray A. BOUDREAUX.
    No. 2010-K-2434.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re Boudreaux, Ray A.; —Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. K, No. 476-062; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2008-KA-1504.

Denied.


text:
    STATE of Louisiana v. Roland ADAMS.
    No. 2010-KP-2249.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re Adams, Roland; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. H, No. 442-009; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-K-0657..

Denied.


text:
    Gwendolyn ROCHESTER v. SOUTHWEST DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER.
    No. 2010-C-1571.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re Rochester, Gwendolyn; —Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Lafayette, Office of Workers’ Compensation District 4, No. 06-04823; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 09-1342.

Denied.


text:
    STATE of Louisiana v. Norman Allen BYRD.
    No. 2010-KO-2644.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re Byrd, Norman Allen; —Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. J, No. 443431; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 KA 0822.

Denied.


text:
    STATE of Louisiana v. Christoher SCIENEAUX.
    No. 2010-K-2639.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re Seieneaux, Christopher; —Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Ascension, 23rd Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 21498; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 KA 0791.

Denied.


text:
    STATE of Louisiana v. Jaret Paul FRANCIS.
    No. 2010-K-2632.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re Francis, Jaret Paul; —Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Terrebonne, 32nd Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 504,828; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 KA 0790.

Denied.


text:
    STATE of Louisiana v. Damon David CALISTE.
    No. 2010-K-2615.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re Caliste, Damon David; —Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. G, No. 460590; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 KA 0650.

Denied.


text:
    STATE of Louisiana v. Kerry J. CURINGTON.
    No. 2010-K-2612.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re Curington, Kerry J.; —Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. J, No. 03-8005; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 09-KA-867.

Denied.


text:
    Douglas STEAD and Charlotte Bremermann v. Susan SWANNER, Chandra Sekhar Korrapati, Individually and as the Administrator of the Estate of Srinivas Korrapati a/k/a “Bobby” Korrapati, Kanaka Durga Korrapati, Srinivas Korrapati a/k/a “Bobby” Korrapati, and Sri Lakshmi Properties, LLC.
    No. 2011-C-0335.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re Swanner, Susan; —Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. N, No. 654-944; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 10-CA-371.

Denied.


text:
    Brian DOYAL v. VERNON PARISH SCHOOL BOARD.
    No. 2011-C-0305.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re Vernon Parish School 'Board; — Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certio-rari and/or Review Office of Workers’ Compensation, District 2, No. 04-05616; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 10-427.

Denied.


text:
    JEWELERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, et al. v. PIPELINE SERVICES, INC., et al.
    No. 2011-CC-0287.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re Pipeline Services Inc.; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. E, Nos. 2008-6928, 2008-9756, 2008-9878; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-C-1595.

Denied.


text:
    Noretta THOMAS and Demetrice Butler, each Individually, and on Behalf of all Others Similarly Situated v. A. WILBERT & SONS, INC., L.L.C. and XYZ Insurance Company. Troy Robichaux, Shannon Robichaux, Michael J. Tuminello, Sr., and Olive D. Tuminello v. State of Louisiana, through the Department of Health and Hospitals and through the Department of Environmental Quality, and Dow Chemical Company.
    No. 2011-CC-0265.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re Dow Chemical Company; Dupree, Ivy; —Defendant(s); Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Iberville, 18th Judicial District Court Divs. B, A, Nos. 55,127, 56,803; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 CW 2308.

Denied. Adequate remedy on appeal.

VICTORY and GUIDRY, JJ., would grant.


text:
    STATE of Louisiana v. Kuantau REEDER.
    No. 2011-KK-0195.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re State of Louisiana; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. E, No. 366-001; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-K-1369.

Denied.

GUIDRY and CLARK, JJ., would grant.


text:
    Rebecca REED v. LCS CORRECTIONS SERVICES, LLC.
    No. 2011-C-0376.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re Reed, Rebecca; —Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review Office of Workers’ Compensation, District 04, No. 09-01849; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 10-866.

Denied.

JOHNSON and KNOLL, JJ., would grant.


text:
    STATE of Louisiana v. Benjamin W. STEVENS.
    No. 2011-KK-0370.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re Stevens, Benjamin W.; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Natchitoches, 10th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. C15780; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KW 10-01057.

Denied.


text:
    Grant Lee JONES, Individually and as Administrator of the Succession of Carol Ann Jones King v. Richard ARIAS and Continental Casualty Company.
    No. 2011-C-0369.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re Arias, Richard; —Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. J, No. 2009-650; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-CA-0165.

Denied.


text:
    Martin BREAUX, Jr. and Michelle Griffin, Individually and on behalf of their Minor Child, Martin Breaux, III v. Claire NEUMANN, M.D.
    No. 2011-CC-0343.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re Breaux III, Martin; Breaux Jr., Martin et al.; Griffin, Michelle; — Plaintiffs); Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 677-930; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 10-C-958.

Denied.

JOHNSON, J., would grant.


text:
    Geraldine OUBRE and Linda Gentry on their Behalf, as Well as Others Similarly Situated v. LOUISIANA CITIZENS FAIR PLAN.
    No. 2011-C-0173.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re Louisiana Citizens Fair Plan; — Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certio-rari and/or Review, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. M, No. 625-567; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 09-CA-620.

Denied.


text:
    Stephanie STANLEY v. John Christopher REAMS.
    No. 2011-C-0389.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re Reams, John Christopher; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. F, No. 2008-12130; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-C-1346.

Denied.


text:
    CATERING CONSULTANTS OF LOUISIANA, L.L.C. v. FIRST AMERICAN INSURANCE AGENCY, LLC.
    No. 2011-CC-0384.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re First American Insurance Agency, LLC; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. James, 23rd Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 33,278; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 10-C-950.

Denied.

CLARK, J., would grant.


text:
    STATE of Louisiana v. James GEORGE, Jr.
    No. 2011-KK-0383.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re George Jr., James; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. G, No. 12-09-0491; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 KW 2033.

Denied.


text:
    Sammy S. PRICE v. KAKI INC., 250 S. Broad Inc., Ahmad T. Elbarqa, ABC Insurance Company, and XYZ Insurance Company.
    No. 2011-C-0379.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re 250 S. Broad Inc.; Kaki Inc.; — Defendant(s); Applying For Writ of Cer-tiorari and/or Review, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. B, No. 08-11253; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-CA-1139.

Denied.


text:
    Edward COLLINS v. STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY and Reggie Glass.
    No. 2011-C-0378.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re Collins Sr., Edward; —Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. L, No. 06-9573; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-CA-0769.

Denied.


text:
    STATE ex rel. Albert HUEY v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2011-KH-0450.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re Huey, Albert; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. G, No. 01-11-0038; to the Court of Appeal, First- Circuit, No. 2011 KW 0147.

Denied.


text:
    STATE of Louisiana v. Eric Dale MICKELSON.
    No. 2011-KK-0436.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re Mickelson, Eric Dale; ■ — Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. 4, No. 262,256; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 46,276-KW.

Denied.


text:
    Christopher BROWN, et al. v. SUTHERLAND LUMBER, INCORPORATED, et al.
    No. 2011-CP-0411.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re Brown, Christopher M.; —Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Rapides, 9th Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 195,641; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 10-469.

Denied.


text:
    Maland SILVIO-SWART v. Legene LETT, Tanya Lett, Jerome N. Terry and Horace Mann Insurance Company.
    No. 2011-CC-0410.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re Silvio-Swart, Maland; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. E, No. 2009-13382; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 CW 1891.

Denied.


text:
    In the SUCCESSION OF Louis Andrew THOMAS, II. Richard S. Thomas v. Louis Andrew Thomas, III.
    No. 2011-C-0409.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re Thomas, Richard S.; —Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. C, Nos. 2007-30066, 2009-10348; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Nos. 2010 CA 0576, 2010 CA 0577, 2010 CA 1001, 2010 CA 1002.

Denied.


text:
    Donna DAVIS, Individually and as Succession Representative of the Estate of Dannie R. Breaux v. CATLIN SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, John Capitano, Jr. d/b/a Capitano’s Truck and Callie C. Capitano.
    No. 2011-CC-0401.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re Catlin Specialty Insurance Company; -Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. Charles, 29th Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 70,536; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 10-C-939.

Denied.


text:
    Brian DOYAL v. VERNON PARISH SCHOOL BOARD.
    No. 2011-C-0400.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re Doyal, Brian; —Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review Office of Workers’ Compensation, District 2, No. 04-05616; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 10^127.

Denied.


text:
    DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY As Trustee on Behalf of Morgan Stanley ABS Capital I Inc., Trust 2006-HE6, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-HE6 and/or Mers as Appropriate v. Nichelle R. CARTER.
    No. 2011-C-0392.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2011.
   In re Carter, Nichelle R.; —Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of St. Charles, 29th Judicial District Court Div. E, No. 68,416; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 10-CA-663.

Denied.


author: CHARLES R. JONES, Judge.

text:
    Stephanie STANLEY v. John Christopher REAMS.
    No. 2010-C-1346.
    Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.
    Jan. 26, 2010.
    Mitchell J. Hoffman, Kim Ngan Nguyen, Lowe Stein Hoffman Allweiss & Hauver, L.L.P., New Orleans, LA, for Stephanie Stanley.
    Jane Ettinger Booth, Booth & Booth, APLC, New Orleans, LA, for John Christopher Reams.
    (Court composed of Judge CHARLES R. JONES, Judge PATRICIA RIVET MURRAY, and Judge EDWIN A. LOMBARD).
   ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING

CHARLES R. JONES, Judge.

11 The application for rehearing of the Respondent, John Christopher Reams, is granted for the limited purpose of clarifying a portion of the disposition rendered by this Court in the writ application of the Relator, Stephanie Stanley. On rehearing, Mr. Reams seeks clarification of that portion of our writ disposition wherein we held that:

... the district court erred in reducing the $190,744 reimbursement claim of the Relator by one-half when there was no proof that the repayment amount owed came from the separate funds of the Relator and the contract between the parties did not call for such a reduction.

Mr. Reams argues that if the reimbursement claim of Ms. Stanley for $190,744, does not arise from her use of separate funds, but from community funds, then she does not have a claim for reimbursement at all under Louisiana community property laws. Mr. Reams further argues that if the repayment amount due stemmed from the use of separate funds of Ms. Stanley, then her reimbursement is limited to one-half, whereas if the repayment amount stems from the use of community funds, then no reimbursement exists. _j2ponsidering the writ application and the record, we determined two things in rendering our disposition on the issue of the reimbursement claim of Ms. Stanley. First, no proof existed as to the true nature of the funds in dispute on the reimbursement claim, and whether those funds were used for community expenses. Additionally, we found that the parties in this matter entered into a consent judgment wherein Mr. Reams agreed to pay Ms. Stanley $190,744 in reimbursement, less any amounts owed to Mr. Reams as reimbursement. The district court erred in adjusting the reimbursement claim of Ms. Stanley where the parties contractually agreed on the manner in which they were going to handle reimbursement issues between themselves. Thus, while we granted rehearing for Mr. Reams for clarification, we affirm the disposition of this Court previously rendered.

DECREE

For the foregoing reasons, we grant the application for rehearing of John Christopher Reams, and affirm the disposition of this Court previously rendered.

APPLICATION FOR REHEARING GRANTED


author: SAUNDERS, Judge.

text:
    Bonnie Jeanne Carret DEROUEN, In Her Capacity as Trustee, et al. v. Adel Jaafar MALAHMEH, et al.
    No. 10-1002.
    Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.
    Feb. 9, 2011.

      Calvin Theodore Guidry, Attorney at Law, Lafayette, LA, for Plaintiff Appellee, Bonnie Jeanne Carret Derouen, Trustee, Isadore J. Carret, Bonnie Jean Jones Car-ret, Trust.
    Frank Edward Barber, Attorney at Law, New Iberia, LA, for Defendants/Appellants, Adel Jaafar Malahmeh, Asma Mohammad A1 Daoud Malahmeh.
    Court composed of ULYSSES GENE THIBODEAUX, Chief Judge, JOHN D. SAUNDERS, and PHYLLIS M. KEATY, Judges.
   SAUNDERS, Judge.

|, This is a case of a vendor/mortgagee filing suit against a mortgagor for the amount due under a promissory note. The mortgagor responded by alleging that the terms of the contract between the parties had been altered due to the customs of the business dealings so as to waive the mortgagee’s right to late charges, that the mortgagee failed to timely pay to him the proceeds from an insurance claim, and that the mortgagee caused him mental damages in its collection practices.

The trial court found that the mortgagee was entitled to judgment to bring the promissory note up to date, inclusive of late charges, and dismissed the mortgagor’s claim against the mortgagee for mental damages. The mortgagor appealed. We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY:

Adel J. Malahmeh and his wife, Asma M. A1 Daoud Malahmeh (collectively Ma-lahmeh), purchased immovable property from the Isadore J. Carret and Bonnie Jean Jones Carret Trust (the trust). Bonnie J. Derouen (Derouen) is the trustee of the trust. However, most of the actual dealings between Malahmeh and the trust were conducted with the other member of the trust, Isadore J. “Brother” Carret (Carret).

In the act of sale, the trust retained a mortgage and vendor’s privilege on the' property sold. The trust financed the transaction by allowing Malahmeh to pay for the property by making promissory notes. One of the notes, in the amount of $225,000.00, was payable over a seven-year period with a balloon payment due on the final day of the note. Other terms in the act of sale obligated Malahmeh to keep the property insured and to pay a late charge of five percent (5%) of the amount of any payment not received within ten days of the due date. After a few months, the parties agreed to change the terms of the agreement modifying the amount of the 12payment and providing that payments were due on the fifteenth of each month.

Malahmeh habitually made untimely payments on the note. There is conflicting testimony in the record of whether the trust informed Malahmeh that the lateness of the payments was unacceptable and whether the trust warned Malahmeh that late charges would apply to the late payments. Additionally, Malahmeh failed to obtain insurance coverage on the property. Thereafter, the trust purchased a policy of insurance covering the property and, according to the members of the trust, intended to add the premiums paid by the trust to the end of the note.

During the term of the note, the property sustained damage via hurricane. Proceeds from an insurance claim filed were kept by the trust in a non-interest bearing account. Malahmeh repaired some a minimal amount of damage done to the property, for which he was reimbursed. However, the net insurance claim proceeds were still in excess of $11,000.00.

On December 5, 2008, the trust filed suit against Malahmeh for collection on the promissory note. Malahmeh responded by filing a reconventional demand for mental damages against the trust for Derouen’s, as trustee, alleged harassing, demeaning, and belittling telephone eall(s) she made in trying to collect on the note.

On October 19, 2009, a trial on the merits was held. A judgment was rendered by the trial court on November 2, 2009, that awarded the trust one hundred three thousand three hundred sixty-three dollars and forty cents ($103,363.40), together with interest thereon at the rate of five percent (5%) per annum from October 19, 2009, until paid. Further, the trust was awarded seven thousand, eleven dollars and fifty cents ($7,011.50) in attorney’s fees. Ma-lahmeh was assessed costs of the proceedings, and his reconventional demand was dismissed. Malahmeh appealed, praising the following assignments of error:

ASSIGNMENTS OF ERROR:

1. The trial court committed manifest error, in failing to determine that the balance of the promissory note was the amount indicated on the amortization schedules kept by Carret and in adding late charges to the calculation of the judgment, even though obligee of the promissory note had not charged Malahmeh the late charges.

2. The trial court committed manifest error in failing to reduce the outstanding balance due on the promissory note by the amount of the insurance proceeds at the time the proceeds were received by the trust.

3. The trial court committed manifest error in dismissing Malahmeh’s claim for damages against the trust.

ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR NUMBER ONE:

Malahmeh asserts in his first assignment of error that the trial court committed manifest error in failing to determine that the balance of the promissory note was the amount indicated on the amortization schedules kept by Carret (Defendant’s Exhibit 2) and in adding late charges to the calculation of the judgment, even though obligee of the promissory note, the trust, had not charged Malahmeh late charges when he made late payments. This assignment contains two assertions: that the trial court should have used Defendant’s Exhibit 2 rather than Plaintiffs Exhibit 12; and that the trial court should not have added the late charges in its judgment awarded to the trust. We disagree with both assertions.

In applying the manifest error-clearly wrong standard, the appellate court must determine not whether the trier of fact was right or wrong, but whether the factfinder’s conclusion was a reasonable one. Where there are two pennissible views of the evidence, a factfinder’s choice between them can never be manifestly erroneous or clearly wrong. Thus, if the [factfinder’s] findings are reasonable in light of the record reviewed in its entirety, the court of appeal may not reverse, even if convinced that had it been sitting as the trier of fact, it would have weighed the evidence differently.

Gradney v. La. Commercial Laundry, 09-1465, pp. 2-3 (La.App. 3 Cm. 5/12/10), 38 So.3d 1115, 1118 (citations omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).

The trial court was presented with two documents that arguably could indicate the amount Malahmeh owed the trust on the promissory note, Plaintiffs Exhibit 12 and Defendant’s Exhibit 2. Malahmeh first argues that the trial court was in error in failing to use Defendant’s Exhibit 2 to calculate the balance he owed on the promissory note. Carret testified that he created Defendant’s Exhibit 2. He testified regarding the document as follows:

Q I’m going to show you an amortization and ask if you recognize that.
A Yes, I do.
Q Can you tell us what that is.
A It was an amortization and whenever [Malahmeh] would bring a payment, I would notate the date and the amount, and[,] as you notice, the amount was always a little short or always late.
Q Okay. So it’s correct to say that as a payment was made you would simply note the date and the amount of payment.
A Yes.
Q So this is not a running total of what you viewed the debt to be at any particular point in time.
A That’s correct.

Further, when the trial court examined Carret, the following exchange took place:

|SQ Am I correct that those amortization schedules were printed from an amortization program that shows the — what the declining balance would be assuming the payments were made on time?
A Yes, sir.
Q Okay. And that’s all the printed part means; is that correct?
A That’s correct.
Q When you received the payments, did you make any effort to show what the declining, what the principal balance would actually be after the payments were received when they were late because the interest would be more and the principal would be less?
A No, I said it was just way too much work. I just said, “[Malahmeh], start catching up. We’re going to add this on the back end.”
Q All right. So basically[,] at some time there would be a reckoning and all those calculations would be made. That’s what you told him.
A That’s what I tried to tell him, there would be reckoning.

It is clear from this testimony that Car-ret did not believe that Defendant’s Exhibit 2 was a record of the declining balance that Malahmeh owed to the trust. The trial court chose to give credence to Car-ret’s testimony, and that testimony provides a reasonable basis for the trial court to disregard Defendant’s Exhibit 2 as the balance Malahmeh owed on the promissory note. See Gradney, 38 So.3d 1115. As such, Malahmeh’s argument that the trial court was manifestly erroneous in failing to determine that the balance of the promissory note was the amount indicated on Defendant’s Exhibit 2 kept by Carret is without merit.

Next, Malahmeh argues that the trial court should not have added the late | ^charges in its judgment awarded to the trust. He bases this argument on the' assertion that the dealings between Malah-meh and Carret established a custom or practice of Malahmeh making late payments without being charged late charges, and that these customs modified the original agreement so as to have the trust give up its right to seek any late charges due. To support his assertion, Malahmeh cites the following language from First National Bank v. Higgs, 406 So.2d 673, 675 n. 1 (La.App. 2 Cir.1981) (citations omitted)(emphasis added):

Forebearance is a circumstance which can give rise to estoppel. Forebearance exists when a creditor acquiesces in or tolerates substandard performance of an obligation by the debtor without exercising his rights to enforce the obligation, thereby implying that such conduct is sufficient.
When forebearance reaches the level of equitable estoppel the creditor will be barred from suddenly demanding strict performance in order to avoid injustice to the debtor. However, the creditor’s mere acquiescence or forebearance by not using all of his rights, when accompanied by protest or complaints to the debtor, does not rise to the level of es-toppel which will later bar the creditor from using those rights to enforce the obligation.

In this regard, Carret, who primarily dealt with Malahmeh in paying the note, testified as follows:

Q Did you have discussion with [Ma-lahmeh] regarding the timeliness of his payments?
A Every time he paid late, I said, “[Malahmeh], try to be on time and try to make it for the proper amount.” That’s about the length of the discussion.
Q Did you ever tell him that late payments were acceptable?
A No.
Q Did you ever tell him that payments in the amount other than the exact payment were acceptable?
17A No, I did not.
Q Did you ever tell him that it was okay to pay every three months rather than every month?
A No.
Q Did you ever tell him that there would not be any late charges at the end of the note?
A No, I did not.
Q Did you have discussions with him about late charges?
A Yes, I told him it would be added on to the end of the bill.

Carret’s testimony provides a reasonable basis for the trial court to have found that Malahmeh’s claim of modification of the contract due to custom between the parties is without merit. Thus, we find no error in the trial court adding the late charges to the judgment awarded to the trust.

ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR NUMBER TWO:

Malahmeh next claims that the trial court committed manifest error in failing to reduce the outstanding balance due on the promissory note by the amount of the insurance claim proceeds at the time those proceeds were received by the trust on January 17, 2006. We disagree.

The trial court used Plaintiffs Exhibit 12 to reach its ultimate decision of what Malahmeh owed to the trust. Plaintiffs Exhibit 12 credited Malahmeh with the proceeds from the insurance claim from the date when suit was filed, December 5, 2008. Malahmeh points to no evidence in the record, nor does he cite any authority | sfor his position, so as to counter how Plaintiffs Exhibit 12 dealt with the issue of when the insurance claim proceeds would be credited to Malahmeh’s ending balance owed on the promissory note. He merely states that the trial court should have used a different date, January 17, 2006, the date when the insurance claim proceeds were paid to the trust for the hurricane damage done to the property, to determine what amount was owed to the trust.

We find the facts surrounding the insurance issue raised to be enlightening. Car-ret testified that he informed Malahmeh that the insurance claim proceeds were available to reimburse any expenses that Malahmeh incurred in fixing the property. Carret also told Malahmeh that those proceeds would be dispersed to him when he either would pay to fix the property or have someone present the trust with a bid as evidence of what it would cost to fix the property. According to Carret, Malahmeh did neither.

Moreover, the contract between Malah-meh and the trust called for Malahmeh to obtain insurance coverage on the property. According to Carret, despite repeated requests from the trust that Malahmeh comply with that requirement, he never did so. Malahmeh’s failure caused the trust to seek out insurance on its own. Certainly, had Malahmeh complied with the trust’s request, he would have received the insurance proceeds at the time they were paid as the contract of insurance would have been between him and the insurance company. Thus, the party that caused Malah-meh not to receive the insurance proceeds on the date when they were paid by the insurance company was Malahmeh, himself, due to his failure to get insurance coverage on the property despite his agreement to do so and the trust’s repeated requests for him to comply.

| ^Accordingly, we find it reasonable for the trial court to have used the only calculation which it was presented on this issue and to have credited the insurance claim proceeds at the time suit was filed rather than when they were paid to the trust, especially in light of Carret’s testimony that it was Malahmeh who failed to obtain insurance, seek out repairs or, at minimum, obtain an estimate of the cost of those repairs. Accordingly, this assignment of error lacks merit.

ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR NUMBER THREE:

In his final assignment of error, Malahmeh contends that the trial court committed manifest error in dismissing his claim for damages against the trust. We find this assignment of error is baseless.

Even though an appellate court may feel its own evaluations and inferences are more reasonable than the factfinder’s, reasonable evaluations of credibility and reasonable inferences of fact should not be disturbed upon review where conflict exists in the testimony.
[W]here two permissible views of the evidence exist[], the factfinder’s choice between them cannot be manifestly erroneous or clearly wrong.

Stobart v. State, 617 So.2d 880, 882-83 (La.1993) (citations omitted).

Louisiana law provides that “debt collection efforts, if extreme and outrageous, will support recovery for intentional infliction of emotional distress.” F. Maraist and T. Galligan, Louisiana Tort Law, §§ 2-6(e), pp. 36-37, n. 83 (1996).

According to Malahmeh, his claim for damages stemmed from phone calls he allegedly received from Derouen wherein she stated that if he did not pay his note timely, “I guess we’ll have to kick your ass out.” According to the trial court, “that’s not demeaning or abusive, that’s pretty much the legal right that you may have if you 1 inhold a mortgage on something, you can foreclose on the mortgage and evict the people that are involved.”

The court passes no judgment on the propriety of the particularly colorful descriptive term that was allegedly used by Derouen towards Malahmeh. However, the record before us indicates that Der-ouen’s alleged actions do not rise to a level of extreme or outrageous.

Moreover, there is conflicting evidence in the record whether Derouen actually used the language cited or even made the phone calls alleged by Malahmeh. Der-ouen testified that she absolutely did not use that language and called Malahmeh very few times over the course of their business dealings. Accordingly, we find no error in the trial court’s dismissal of Ma-lahmeh’s claim for damages against the trust for mental distress.

ANCILLARY MATTER:

The trust has requested $2,500.00 in attorney’s fees for work done on appeal. “Generally, when an award for attorney’s fees is granted at the trial level, additional attorney’s fees are proper for work done on appeal. This is to keep the appellate judgment consistent with the underlying judgment.” Wilczewski v. Brookshire Grocery Store, 08-718, p. 18 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1/28/09), 2 So.3d 1214, 1226, writ denied, 09-456 (La.4/13/09), 5 So.3d 170. A review of work performed on appeal suggests that $2,500.00 in attorney’s fees is reasonable. Accordingly, we grant this request and award the trust $2,500.00 in attorney’s fees for work done on appeal.

DECREE:

Malahmeh raised three assignments of error. We found no error by the trial court in any of the assignments raised. Additionally, we granted the trust’s request for 1142,500.00 in attorney’s fees for work done on appeal. All costs of this appeal are assessed to Malahmeh.

AFFIRMED.