text:
    EX PARTE Carl Michael SEIBERT (In re: Carl Michael Seibert v. Lorrie Ann Fields Seibert)
    2160006
    Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.
    January 06, 2017
    Lowell H. Becraft, Jr., Huntsville, for petitioner.
    Amber Yerkey James and David Ray Pace, New Beginnings Family Law, P.C., Huntsville, for respondent.
   MOORE, Judge.

Carl Michael Seibert (“the former husband”) petitions this court for a writ of mandamus directing the Madison Circuit Court (“the trial court”) to set aside as void two orders entered in case number DR-13-900006, the divorce action between the former husband and Lorrie Ann Fields Seibert (“the former wife”). We deny the petition.

Background and Procedural History

On October 6, 2012, the circuit-court judges of the Twenty-Third Judicial Circuit, of which the trial court is a part, adopted a “standing pendente lite order” that is “to be considered entered in every original contested divorce action filed in [that]- Judicial Circuit without further order,” On January 2, 2013, the former wife filed in the trial court a complaint seeking a divorce from the former husband based on the ground of incompatibility of temperament. The former wife served the former husband with the complaint and a copy of portions of .the standing pendente lite or-, der, including a provision prohibiting the former wife and the former husband from harassing each other.

On August 12, 2013, the former wife filed a motion seeking to hold the former husband in contempt for, among other things, violating the harassment provision in the standing pendente lite order. On August 20, 2013, the trial court entered an order adopting the standing pendente lite order and stating that it considered the standing pendente lite order “to have come into full force and effect with the filing of [the divorce] action.”-.On September 4, 2013, the former husband answered the former wife’s motion for contempt, stating, among other things, that the standing pen-dente lite order had not been in force until it was adopted by the trial court on August 20, 2013. Subsequently, the former wife filed three more motions requesting that the former-husband be held in contempt for violating the standing pendente. lite order; the former husband also filed a motion to hold the former wife in contempt for violating the standing pendente lite order,. After a trial, the tidal court entered a judgment divorcing the parties and denying all the motions for contempt. The former husband-appealed, and this court affirmed the divorce judgment, without an' opinion. Seibert v. Seibert 217 So. 3d 843 (Ala. Civ. App. 2015) (table).

On December 6, 2013, the former husband was indicted on a charge of aggravated stalking in the second degree; an element of that crime is that the defendant’s conduct must have “violate[d] [a] court order or injunction.” Ala. Code 1975, § 13A-6-91.1. The former husband asserts that, through discovery, he was informed that he had been accused of stalking the former wife in violation of the standing pendente lite order. The former husband moved to dismiss the indictment on the basis that the standing pendente lite order was void; that motion was denied. The former husband did not seek mandamus review of the order denying the motion to dismiss, and the criminal action proceeded to trial. According to the former husband, the judge presiding over the criminal action declared .a mistrial after the jury reported that it could not reach a unanimous verdict.

At some point, the former husband filed a modification action, designated as case number DR-13-900006.01. The trial court entered a final judgment in the modification action on August 17, 2016. The former husband filed a postjudgment motion in the modification action on August 22, 2016, seeking to vacate the standing pendente lite order. The trial court denied that motion on August 25, 2016. The former husband then filed, on September 19, 2016, a “motion to reconsider and vacate' plainly void order”; the trial' court entered an order denying that motion on September 20, 2016. The former husband filed his petition for a writ of mandamus with this court on October 4, 2016.

Discussion

In his petition for a writ of mandar-mus, the former husband seeks an order from this court compelling thé. trial court to vacate the standing pendente lite order entered in case number DR-13-900006 and the August 20, 2013, order adopting the standing pendente lite order entered in case number DR-13-900006. However, the former husband did not file a motion to vacate those orders in case number DR-13-900006. The record from that case shows that the trial court entered a final judgment in case number DR-13-900006 on July 10, 2014, which did not incorporate either of the interlocutory orders. By operation of law, those interlocutory orders were superseded' by the final judgment and no longer have any legal effect. See F.M. v. B.S., 170 So.3d 663, 668 (Ala. Civ. App. 2014).

The former husband filed his motions to vacate the orders in case number DR-13-900006.0.1, the modification action. Assuming the former husband validly filed his motions in the modification action, which we do not decide, the former husband has failed to cite any legal authority by which the trial court could have vacated the standing pendente lite order and the August 20, 2013, order. Neither Rule 59, Ala. R. Civ. P., nor Rule 60(b), Ala. R. Civ. P., the only legal authorities upon which the former husband relies, permit a trial court to vacate interlocutory orders. Both Rule 59 and Rule 60(b) apply solely to final judgments. See Ex parte Troutman Sanders, LLP, 866 So.2d 547, 649 (Ala. 2003) (explaining that a Rule 69 motion cannot be used as a vehicle to attack an interlocutory order); and EB Invs., L.L.C. v. Atlantis Dev., Inc., 930 So.2d 502, 508 (Ala. 2005) (pointing out that Rule 60(b) does not apply to interlocutory orders).

The former husband complains that, unless the trial court declares the orders void, he will be subject to continued criminal prosecution under Ala. Code 1975, § 13A-6-91.1. Nevertheless, the former husband has failed to show that the trial court had jurisdiction to vacate the orders and a mandatory duty to vacate the orders in case number DR-13-900006.01.

“A writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy available only when' the petitioner demonstrates: “‘(1) a dear legal right to- the order sought; (2) an imperative duty upon the respondent to perform, accompanied by a refusal to do so; (3) the lack of another adequate remedy; and (4) the properly invoked jurisdiction of the court.”’ Ex parte Nall, 879 So.2d 541, 543 (Ala. 2003) (quoting Ex parte BOC Group, Inc., 823 So.2d 1270, 1272 (Ala. 2001)).”

Ex parte T.J., 74 So.3d 447, 450 (Ala. Civ. App. 2011) (emphasis added). We conclude that, if § 13A-6-91.1 requires proof of the violation of a valid court order, which we do not decide, but see Morton v. State, 651 So.2d 42, 46-47 (Ala. Crim. App. 1994), the former husband cannot negate that essential element of the criminal prosecution through the instant petition for a writ of mandamus. However, our opinion does not preclude the former husband from seeking appellate review of any order or judgment entered in any subsequent criminal proceeding regarding the validity of. the orders the former husband allegedly violated.

PETITION DENIED.

Pittman and Donaldson, JJ., concur.

Thompson, P.J., dissents, with writing, which Thomas, J,, joins. -

THOMPSON, Presiding Judge,

dissenting.

On October 5, 2012, the judges of the Circuit Court of Madison County (“the trial court”) each signed an “Order Regarding Issuance of Standing Pendente Lite Orders Upon Filing of Original-Contested Divorce Action” (“the 2012 standing pen-dente lite order”), which contained, in relevant part, a provision stating that parties to a divorce action were not to harass each other. On January 3, 2013, Lome Ann Fields Seibert (“the wife”) filed her divorce complaint seeking a divorce from Carl Michael Seibert (“the husband”). In the divorce action, both parties, among other things, sought to have the other held in contempt for violations of the 2012 standing pendente lite order, which was specifically adopted in the divorce action by the trial court in an August 20, 2013, order (“the 2013 pendente lite order”). The husband did not file a petition for a writ of mandamus challenging that opder.

In the divorce action, the trial court did not expressly rule on the parties’ competing contempt claims, but in its July 10, 2014, divorce judgment, the trial court denied all claims not specifically addressed in that judgment. Although the husband appealed that judgment, he did not assert any argument in that appeal pertaining to the 2013 pendente lite order. The husband did not assert on appeal of that judgment the issues he raises in this petition. See Seibert v. Seibert, 217 So. 3d 843 (Ala. Civ. App. 2015) (table).

Assuming, solely for the purpose of this writing, that the 2013 pendente lite order was not subsumed into the divorce judgment, this court may not review the 2013 pendente lite order by way of this untimely petition for a writ of mandamus. See Ex parte Pelham Tank Lines, Inc., 898 So.2d 733, 734 (Ala. 2004) (the presumptively reasonable time in which to file a petition for writ of mandamus is within 42 days of the entry of the order being challenged). Further, the husband has not filed any pleadings or motions in the divorce action, or an independent action, seeking to set aside any orders or judgments in the divorce action based on the arguments he currently asserts before this court. Accordingly, there is no order entered in. the divorce action from which the husband could seek review in this court, and, therefore, this court would have no jurisdiction to address the husband’s arguments in connection with that divorce action.

I also conclude that this court has no jurisdiction to consider the husband’s arguments as part of the husband’s, later modification and Rule 60(b), Ala. R. Civ. P., action. First, I conclude that the 2013 pendente lite order was superseded by the divorce judgment. See F.M. v. B.S., 170 So.3d 663, 668 (Ala. Civ. App. 2014); and S.K. v. N.B., 160 So.3d 27, 31 (Ala. Civ. App. 2014). However, even assuming that the husband could seek to set aside the 2013 pendente lite order as a part of the modification action, this court has no jurisdiction, under the procedural history as presented to this court by the parties, to address the issue.

The materials submitted to this court indicate that on August 17, 2016, the trial court entered a judgment in the modification action' initiated by the husband in which it specified that it was addressing both the husband’s petition to modify and a Rule 60(b), motion filed by the husband. No pleadings or motions that resulted in that August 17, 2016, judgment are in the materials submitted to this court by the parties. Accordingly, this court is unable to determine the nature of the relief the husband sought under Rule 60(b).

Regardless, the denial of a Rule 60(b) motion is reviewable by appeal, not by a petition for a writ of mandamus. Ex parte King, 821 So.2d 205, 209 (Ala. 2001). Thus, in order to obtain review of that part of the August 17, 2016, judgment denying his request for relief pursuant to Rule 60(b), the husband was required to have filed a notice of appeal within 42 days of the entry of that judgment," i.e., by September 28, 2016. Reeves v. State, 882 So.2d 872, 873-74 (Ala. Civ. App. 2003). The husband did not appeal the August 17, 2016, denial of his Rule 60(b) motion. This, court cannot construe the husband’s current petition for a writ of mandamus as a challenge of the August 17, 2016, denial of his request for Rule 60(b) relief because that ruling was reviewable by appeal rather than by ,a petition for a writ of mandamus. Ex parte S.B., 164 So.3d 599, 602 (Ala. Civ. App. 2014); Ex parte Gallant, 221 So. 3d 1120, 1122 (Ala. Civ. App. 2016) (“This court reviews the denial of a Rule 60(b)[ ] motion by appeal and not by a petition for a writ of mandamus.”). Also, even if this court were to interpret the husband’s petition for a writ of mandamus as a notice of appeal of the August 17, 2016, judgment, it was filed outside the 42 days allowed for taking such an appeal.

Rather than appealing the denial of his initial request for Rule 60(b) relief, the husband filed in the trial court an August 22, 2016, “motion to vacate or objection,” in which he argued that the 2012 standing pendente lite order was void ab initio and, therefore,, that the 2012 standing pendente lite order and the 2013 pendente lite order must be “vacated and set aside.” On August 25, 2016, the trial court entered an' order that, among other things, specifically denied the husband’s August 22, 2016, motion.

The main opinion has characterized the husband’s August 22, 2016, motion as a postjudgment motion, i.e., one filed pursuant to Rule 59, Ala. R. Civ. P. 231 So. 3d at 1112 (“The former husband filed.a post-judgment motion in the modification action on August 22, 2016, seeking to vaeate the standing pendente lite order.”). I disagree with, the main opinion, however, "when it concludes that that motion could be considered as having been filed in reference to the 2012 standing pendente lite order and the 2013 pendente lite order entered in the divorce action; rather, that motion was filed with regard to the August 17, 2016, judgment entered in the modification action. It is arguable that the husband’s August 22, 2016, motion is one made pursuant to Rule 59(e), Ala. R. Civ. P., both because it was filed within the 30 days of the August 17,2016, judgment, as required by Rule 59(e), and because it appears to seek reconsideration of thé trial court’s denial of a request for the type of relief arguably available under Rule 60(b). I note that the husband has failed to submit to this court portions of the record regarding the nature of the Rule 60(b) relief he sought as a part of, or together with, his modification action, which relief was denied in the August 17, 2016, judgment. In the absence of such evidence, this court may not assume that the relief for which the husband argued in his August 22, 2016, motion was different from the relief that he requested together with the modification claims, and upon which the trial court ruled in its August 17, 2016, judgment. Accordingly, in order to avoid presuming error on the part of the trial court, I conclude that this court must assume that the Rule 60(b) request for relief the trial court considered before' entering its August 17, 2016, judgment and the relief sought in the August 22,2016, motion were the same in nature.

If this court interprets the August 22, 2016, motion as a postjudgment motion, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider the husband’s arguments. A trial court does not have jurisdiction to reconsider, through a Rule 59(e) postjudgment motion, a denial of a Rule 60(b) motion. Ex parte Keith, 771 So.2d 1018, 1022 (Ala. 1998). To the extent that the husband, in his August 22, 2016, motion, sought to have the trial court reconsider its denial, in the August 17, 2016, modification judgment, of his request for Rule 60(b) relief, the trial court had no jurisdiction to do so. As already explained, the husband did not timely appeal the denial of his request for Rule 60(b) relief in the August 17, 2016, judgment. .

On the.other hand, it is arguable that the husband’s August 22, 2016, motion was a Rule 60(b) motion, albeit one on which the husband was not likely to prevail. Even if this court were to assume that the husband’s August 22, 2016, motion was a Rule 60(b) motion, this court does not have jurisdiction to consider the husband’s petition. The husband has .failed to demonstrate that the August 22, 2016, motion sought relief that was different from that addressed by the trial court in its August 17, 2016, judgment. The trial court was without jurisdiction to consider a successive Rule 60(b) motion. Wadsworth v. Markel Ins. Co., 906 So.2d 179, 182 (Ala. Civ. App. 2005).

In Wadsworth v. Markel Insurance Co., supra, the Wadsworths filed a series of successive Rule 60(b) motions.' This court dismissed the appeal of the denial of one of those Rule 60(b) motions on the basis that the trial court had lacked jurisdiction to consider that motion and, therefore, this court did not have jurisdiction. In doing so, this court stated' that’ “[successive Rule 60(b) motions on the same grounds are generally considered motions to reconsider the original ruling and are not authorized by Rule 60(b).” Wadsworth v. Markel Ins. Co., 906 So.2d at 182.

“ ‘In other words, a party who has previously filed an unsuccessful motion seeking relief under Rule 60(b) may not properly file a second motion in the trial court that, in effect, requests the trial .court to revisit its denial of the first motion, such as by reasserting the .grounds relied upon in the first motion.’ ”

Williams v. Williams, 70 So.3d 332, 334 (Ala. Civ. App. 2009) (quoting Pinkerton Sec. & Investigations Servs., Inc, v. Chamblee, 934 So.2d 386, 390 (Ala. Civ. App. 2005)) (emphasis omitted).

In the absence of proof from the husband that the relief he sought in his August 22, 2016, motion was in the nature of a Rule 60(b) motion, and that that relief was different from the request for relief upon which the trial' court had already ruled in its August Í7, 2016, judgment, the trial court was without jurisdiction to consider that successive. Rule 60(b) motion. Even assuming further that the trial court could consider that successive Rule 60(b) motion, the appropriate method of obtaining review in this court would be by way of an appeal. Ex parte King, supra.

The husband’s September 19, 2016, motion, referenced in the main opinion, argued the same issues and grounds the husband raised in his August 22, 2016, motion. Accordingly, for the same reasons explained in this writing, the trial court lacked jurisdiction to consider the September 19, 2016, motion, arid this court does not have jurisdiction over a petition for a writ of mandamus from the denial'of that motion. Ex parte King, supra; Wadsworth v. Markel Ins. Co., supra.

For the reasons discussed in this writing, the husband’s petition for a .writ of mandamus is due to be dismissed;, therefore, I dissent.

Thomas, J., concurs.

      . We have taken judicial notice of the record from Seibert v. Seibert 217 So. 3d 843 (Ala. Civ. App. 2015) (table), the appeal of the judgment entered -in the divorce action. See City of Mobile v. Matthews, 220 So. 3d 1061, 1063 (Ala. Civ. App. 2016) ("[A] court may take judicial notice of its own records.”).

      . In its August 17, 2016, judgment, the trial court modified custody of one of the parties’ twin daughters, modified the visitation provisions of the divorce judgment, and addressed certain issues pertaining to property; it then denied all other requested relief not addressed in that judgment.

      . The main opinion concludes that the August 22, 2016, motion, as well as a later, successive motion, could not be validly filed as Rule 59(e) motions from the 2012 standing penden- ■ te lite order and the 2013 pendente lite order entered in the divorce action because such a motion may not be made in reference to a nonfinal order. 231 So. 3d at 1114.

      . I address the appropriateness of such a request for relief later-in this writing in note 5, infra.

      . I agree with the statement in the main opinion that a Rule 60(b) motion does not provide relief with regard to interlocutory orders such . as the 2012 standing pendente lite order and the 2013 pendente lite order, assuming that those orders have not been subsumed by the divorce judgment. See E.B. Invs., L.L.C. v. Atlantis Dev., Inc., 930 So.2d 502, 508 (Ala. 2005). However, whether such relief is ultimately available under Rule 60(b) does not determine the nature of the motion. In other words, "it is the substance of a motion, not its nomenclature, that is controlling; 'the relief sought in a motion determines how to treat the motion,’ ” Campton v. Miller, 19 So.3d 245, 249 (Ala. Civ. App. 2009) (quoting Allied Prods. Corp. v. Thomas, 954 So.2d 588, 589 n. 3 (Ala. Civ. App. 2006)) (emphasis added). The nature of a part of the relief the husband sought in his August 22,-2016, motion i,e„ to have certain orders declared void, is a type of ■relief contemplated by Rule 60(b), although that request for relief would be appropriately denied because it was made in reference to certain pendente lite orders, •


source: Caselaw Access Project

author: DONALDSON, Judge.

license: Public Domain

text:
    John Mark SURGINER and Jeffrey Ward Surginer v. Sharon M. ROBERTS
    2150781
    Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.
    February 3, 2017
    Rehearing Denied March 24, 2017

      Robert C. King, Monroeville, for appellants.
    J. Michael Druhan, Jr., and Deena R. Tyler of Druhan & Tyler, LLC, Mobile, for appellee.
   DONALDSON, Judge.

John Mark Surginer (“John”) and Jeffrey Ward Surginer (“Jeffrey”) appeal from a judgment of the Wilcox Circuit Court (“the'trial'court”) purporting to vest title to certain property in Sharon M. Roberts. Both the Surginers and Roberts describe the proceedings conducted before the trial court as involving a claim by Roberts for judicial redemption of that property. Although we question the manner in which the proceedings were presented to the trial court, we must address the issues presented on appeal as framed by the parties. Because the Surginers have-not demonstrated a basis for reversal, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Facts and Procedural History

In 1994, Roberts purchased approximately 68 acres of land along the Alabama River (“the property”). The property contained, among other things, an uninhabitable trailer and a cabin. In 2001, Jeffrey offered to purchase the property from Roberts. Roberts declined the offer. Jeffrey then obtained an assignment of a mortgage on the property from Charles and Maxine Haskew, the previous owners and the mortgagees of the property. Im-' mediately thereafter, Jeffrey attempted to foreclose on the property, but he was unable to do so because Roberts was under the protection of a United States bankruptcy court. In 2002, Roberts apparently commenced- an action in the trial court against Jeffrey relating to his attempt to foreclose on the property.

Although the circumstances are not entirely clear from the record, it appears that in 2002 Jeffrey paid the. property taxes on the property that were apparently delinquent at the time, Ip 2004, John purchased the property at a tax sale for $10,100. Jeffrey testified that he did not know at that time that John had purchased the property. In September 2005, apparently in settlement of the action Roberts had commenced, Jeffrey executed a quitclaim deed conveying his interest in the property to Roberts in exchange for $10,000. Roberts’s action against Jeffrey was dismissed pursuant to that settlement.

On July 10, 2007, the Wilcox Probate Court, noting that the time for redemption following .the 2004 tax sale had elapsed, recorded a deed, pursuant to § 40-10-29, Ala.. Code 1975, conveying the property jointly to the Surginers. In 2007 and 2008, the Surginers made various purported improvements to the property.

In 2008, Roberts commenced an action in the probate court seeking to redeem the property pursuant to § 40-10-120 et seq., Ala. Code 1975. On January 26, 2009, the probate court issued a certificate of redemption to Roberts. See § 40-1Ó-127, Ala. Code 1975. Thereafter, the Surginers were ,ordered to be ejected from the property.

On November 18, 2009, the Surginers filed a complaint for declaratory relief-in the trial- court. In the complaint, the Sur-giners sought a judgment declaring that the certificate of redemption issued by the probate court ■ in January 2009 was -void and that Roberts had no right to possess the property. In her answer to the Surgin-ers’ complaint, Roberts asserted, among other things,' that she had received from Jeffrey, in exchange for $10,000, a quitclaim deed to the property in September 2005. After Roberts filed her answer, the case was placed on the administrative docket by the agreement .of the parties.

On June 21, 2011, Roberts filed an amended answer, in which she asserted that she had redeemed the property, and a counterclaim, in which she sought, among other things, a judgment declaring that the certificate of redemption issued by the probate court on January 26, 2009, was valid. Thereafter, the trial of the case was continued several times.

On October 17, 2014, the Surginers filed an amended complaint and a-reply to Roberts’s counterclaim. In the amended complaint, the Surginers reasserted their previous allegations, but they also asserted that Roberts had wrongfully evicted them from the property and had wrongfully removed timber from the property. Roberts filed an answer to the amended complaint and an amended counterclaim, ‘asserting claims, of abuse of process and conspiracy to commit abuse of process.

A. trial was held on December 3, 2014. The only witnesses at the trial were Jeffrey and Daniel Crigger, a home inspector hired by Roberts. On March 9, 2016, the trial court entered what'it-styled’as a “Final Order.” In the order, the trial court made various findings of fact and conclusions of law, and ordered the following:

“1. The Certificate of Redemption issued by the Probate Judge of Wilcox County on January 26, 2009 is vacated as null and void and the- Probate Judge shall vacate such redemption.
“2. To redeem the property at issue, the Defendant, Sharon Roberts, shall pay the following sums within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order.
“a. The sum of $19,229.47 to the [Sur-giners] reflecting the purchase price and taxes paid by the [Surginers] and interest at a rate of 12 percent per annum.
“b. A reasonable attorney’s fee to [the Surginers’] attorneys for bringing this action.
“c. The sum of $15,800.00 for loss [of] use of the property.
“3. If the amounts contained' within this Order are not paid in full by [Roberts] within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, then [Roberts’s] right to judicially redeem the property at issue shall terminate and the Court will issue an additional Order quieting title to such property and granting possession of such property to the [Surginers],
“4. That the Probate Court of Wilcox County is hereby ordered to immediately pay to the Circuit Clerk of Wilcox County all money held by the Probate Court previously paid to the Probate Court of Wilcox County by Sharon Roberts in order to obtain a Certificate of Redemption issued by the Probate Court of Wilcox County on January 26, 2009. '
“5. The costs of this action, consisting of the filing fee in the amount of $435.00 is hereby taxed against [Roberts].”

On April 14, 2016, the trial court entered the following, which it styled as a “Judgment”:

“This matter having previously córae before the Court for trial on the merits, and the Court having entered an Order on March 9, 2016, setting forth the monetary amounts that were required to be paid by [Roberts] in order to redeem the subject property from a prior tax sale, and the Court having further ordered that if the amounts set forth in the March 9 order were not paid in full by [Roberts] on or before April 8, 2016, then [Roberts’s] right to judicially redeem the subject property from the tax sale was terminated, and it now appearing to the satisfaction of the Court that [Roberts) failed or refused to pay the various amounts required for the redemption of the subject property as contained in the order of March 9, 2016, within the time allowed by the Court, therefore,
“IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED by the Court as follows:
“1. The purported Certificate of Redemption from Tax Sale of the subject lands heretofore issued by the Probate Judge of Wilcox County on, to-wit, January 26, 2009, is vacated as null and void for want of jurisdiction, and the Probate Judge of Wilcox County shall forthwith vacate such redemption certificate by written order.
“Further, the Judge of Probate of Wilcox County, Alabama, shall pay and refund to [Roberts] all amounts previously paid to the Judge of Probate for the purported redemption of the subject property. A copy of this Order shall be served upon the Probate Judge of Wilcox County by the Clerk of this Court, and the Judge of Probate shall forthwith comply with the terms hereof.
“2. [Roberts] shall have no further right, title, interest, claim or encumbrance in and to the subject property,, viz: Wilcox County Tax Parcel Number 28-01-11-0-000-010.000 #0 and Parcel Number. 28-01-12-000.003000 #0, as further described in the Tax Deed recorded in Deed Book 11E, Page 483 in the records of the Probate Court of Wilcox County, Alabama, and the fee simple title to all such lands is hereby quieted in the [Surginers],
“3. The [Surginers] shall have and recover of [Roberts] the sum of $15,800.00, as their damages for [Roberts’s] use and occupancy of the subject lands since 2009, for whjch execution shall issue.
“4. The [Surginers] shall also have and recover of [Roberts] the sum of $15,000.00, as attorneys’ fees permitted under the subject judicial redemption statute, such amount having been stipulated by and between the parties in open Court as a reasonable fee for the services of the [Surginers’] attorneys in defending the redemption action.
“5. The [Surginers] shall also have and recover of [Roberts] immediate and exclusive possession of the subject property, and a writ of possession shall issue to the Sheriff of Wilcox County, Alabama, authorizing him to execute this judgment of possession if [Roberts] has not completely vacated the premises and removed all of her goods and chattels therefrom within fourteen (14) days from the date of this order. [Roberts] is specifically enjoined and restrained from committing any damage op waste upon the subject premises.
“6. Since [Roberts] has defaulted with respect to her redemption of the subject property, all costs of this action, including all fees of the appraiser appointed by the Court as a Special Master, are taxed to [Roberts], for which execution shall issue.
“7. A certified copy of this order shall be duly recorded in the Deed Records of the Judge of Probate of Wilcox County, Alabama, and indexed appropriately with [Roberts] as grantor and the [Sur-giners] ap grantees.”

On April 15, 2016, Roberts filed a “motion to set aside” the April 14, 2016, judgment. In her motion, she alleged that her attorney had not received potice of the March 9, 2016, order, and she requested an additional 30 days to comply with the March 9, 2016, order. On April 18, 2016, the trial court entered an order entitled: “ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STAY THE ORDER PENDING A HEARING ON MAY 5, 2016.” (Capitalization in original.) The body of the order contained the following language: “MOTION TO SET ASIDE ORDER/JUDGMENT OF APRIL 14, 2016 filed by ROBERTS SHARON M is hereby GRANTED IN PART.” (Capitalization in original.) The Surginers filed a motion in opposition to Roberts’s motion to set aside the judgment. On May 4, 2016, Roberts filed an “amended motion to set aside, alter, or amend” the April 14, 2016, judgment and the March 9, 2016, order. In that amended motion, Roberts asserted, among other things, that the March 9, 2016, order was not a final order.

On May 5, 2016, the trial court held a hearing on Roberts’s motions. On May 10, 2016, the trial court entered the following order:

“1. That [Roberts’s] Motion to Set Aside and Amended Motion to Set Aside, Alter or Amend the Order/Judgment of April 14, 2016 and Order of March [9], 2016 is hereby granted.
“2. That the reasonable attorneys’ fee awarded to the [Surginers’] attorneys is hereby set in the amount of $15,000.00.
“3. That the Wilcox County Commission Office is hereby ordered to pay any and all monies held by this office, initially paid to the Probate Court of Wilcox County by Sharon Roberts in January of 2009, to the Circuit Clerk of Wilcox County with a copy of proof of said payment being delivered to the attorneys for the parties in this action. That a copy of this Order shall be immediately provided to the Wilcox County Commission Office.
“4. That the Defendant, Sharon M. Roberts shall pay to the Circuit Clerk of Wilcox County the following sums:
“a. The sum of $19,229.47 to the [Sur-giners] reflecting the purchase price and taxes paid by the [Surginers] and interest at a rate of 12 percent per annum.
“b. The sum of $15,000.00 attorney’s fee to [the Surginers’] attorney for bringing this action.
“c. The sum of $15,800.00 for loss [of] use of the property.
“d. The costs in this action consisting of the filing fee in. the amount of $435.00.
“That [Roberts] shall be given credit from the above amounts, the amount paid by the Wilcox County Commission Office to the Circuit Clerk of Wilcox County set forth above.
“5. That the total amount to be paid by Sharon Roberts to the [Surginers] is in the amount of $50,464.47. That after the Wilcox County Commission Office pays to the Circuit Clerk all funds being held by the Commission Office, [Roberts] shall have fourteen (14) days to pay to the Circuit Clerk of Wilcox County the remaining balance of the above sums ordered by the Court.”

On May 26, 2016, Roberts filed a document in which she asserted that she had complied with the trial court’s May 10, 2016, order. On May 31, 2016, the trial court entered the following judgment:

“That the Court having receive[d] notice that Defendant Sharon M. Roberts has complied with this Court’s Orders of March [9]th, 2016, and May 10th, 2016, which ascertained attorneys’ fees to be paid by [Roberts] and [Roberts] having paid into the Court the amount of the judgment and costs, the Court hereby enters judgment for [Roberts] and finds that [Roberts] has been in possession of the subject property and has properly redeemed the property in question under Section 40-10-83 of the Code of Alabama (1975).
“Therefore, the Court enters a final judgment for the Defendant, Sharon M. Roberts divesting the Plaintiffs, John Mark Surginer and Jeffrey Ward Sur-giner of any and all claim, right, title or interest in and to the subject property and vesting in the Defendant, Sharon M. Roberts all right, title and interest in the subject property, more particularly described in the deed to Sharon M. Roberts from Charles Harvey Haskew and wife, Maxine G. Haskew dated August 3rd, 1994, and recorded in Deed Book M, Page 447 in the Probate Records of Wilcox County, and as further described as Wilcox County tax parcel number 28-01-11-0-000-010.000 #0 and parcel number 28-01-12-0000.003000 #0, and further described in the tax deed recorded. in Deed Book 11E, Page 483 in the records of the Probate Court of Wilcox County. Title to said property is hereby quieted in Sharon M. Roberts.”

On June 13, 2016, the Surginers filed a notice of appeal to the supreme court, and the supreme court-transferred the appeal to this court pursuant to § 12-2-7(6), Ala. Code 1975.

Discussion

On appeal, the Surginers argue, among .other things, that the trial court committed reversible error by vacating its April 14, 2016, judgment. The Surginers argue that both the April 15, 2016, and the May 4, 2016, motions should be construed as motions filed pursuant to Rule 59, Ala. R. Civ. P., and that both were untimely because they were not filed within 30 days of the entry of the March 9, 2016, order. The Surginers argue that the trial court had no jurisdiction to entertain those motions and, therefore, had no jurisdiction, to vacate the April 14,2016, order.

In response, Roberts argues that the Surginers should have filed a petition for the writ of mandamus relating to the May 10, 2016, order of the trial court setting aside the earlier orders, in the. alternative, Roberts describes her motion of April 15, 2016, as amended on May 4, 2016, as having been filed pursuant to Rule 60(b), Ala, R.. Civ. P., and that the trial court’s order of May 10, 2016, granted that motion.

We hold that the document entitled “Pinal Order” entered on March 9, 2016, was not a final order for purposes of the application of Rule 59, Ala. R. Civ. P. See Ex parte Troutman Sanders, LLP, 866 So.2d 547, 549-50 (Ala. 2003) (holding that Rule 59 applies only to final orders capable of supporting an appeal). The March 9, 2016, order specifically required Roberts to,' among other things, pay the ordered amounts in full “within thirty (30)' days from the date Of this Order, [otherwise] [Roberts’s] right to judicially redeem the property at issue shall terminate and the Court will issue an additional Order quieting title to such property and granting possession of such property to the [Surgin-ers].” Further, the order did not vest title to the property in either the Surginers or Roberts, as had been requested by the pleadings of the parties. Because it did not completely resolve the. claims of the parties and expressly contemplated further action by the trial court, the March 9, 2016, order was not final. See Ex parte Bessemer Bd. of Educ., 68 So.3d 782, 788 n.5 (Ala. 2011)(noting that an order that “leaves the parties with something to determine on their own and leaves open the possibility of further action by the trial court” is not a final order).. See also Batey & Sanders, Inc. v. Dodd, 755 So.2d 581, 582 (Ala. Civ. App. 1999)(noting that when a trial court’s order contemplates further proceedings it is not a final judgment). See also Blood v. Blood, 223 So. 3d 231, 237 (Ala. Civ. App. 2016) (construing an order that required the parties to take further action as a nonfinal order).

The “judgment” entered on April 14, 2016, appears to have been a final judgment, because it did not have the characteristics of nonfinality that were contained in the March order. That judgment, however, was vacated by the trial court’s order of May 10, 2016, which effectively granted Roberts’s May 4, 2016, motion. We. note that, although it granted a specific amount of attorney’s fees to the Surginers and ordered the Wilcox- County Commission and Roberts to pay certain specified funds, the trial court’s May 10, 2016, order was not a final order because it did not completely resolve the claims between the parties — -specifically, it did not vest the title to the property in either the Surginers or Roberts. “A ruling that determines fewer than all the claims is ordinarily not final as to any of the parties or as to any of the claims.” Kelley v. Thomas, 878 So.2d 1168, 1171 (Ala. Civ. App. 2003)(citing Rule 54(b), Ala. R. Civ. P.).

The trial court’s May 31, 2016, judgment in favor of Roberts divested the Surginers of any claim, title, or interest in the property, and vested all right, title, and interest in the property in Roberts. Therefore, the May 31, 2016, judgment was a final judgment capable of supporting the appeal filed on June 13,2016.

In order to analyze the issues framed by the parties in this appeal, we observe that the Surginers initiated the underlying action by filing a complaint in the trial court seeking a judgment declaring that the probate court’s certificate of redemption issued on January 26, 2009, was invalid. The certificate of redemption had been issued by the probate court and permitted Roberts to obtain the property through the process of statutory redemption pursuant to § 40-10-120 et seq., Ala. Code 1975. The law in Alabama is that

“[a] party aggrieved by the erroneous issuance of a certificate of redemption may petition a circuit court in the county in which the probate court lies for a writ of mandamus to compel the vacating of the certificate. Ordinarily, a circuit court may issue a writ of mandamus to a probate court only in cases in which it has appellate jurisdiction. See Ex parte Jim Walter Res., Inc., 91 So.3d 50, 52 (Ala. 2012). Section 12-22-21, Ala. Code 1975, which defines the appellate jurisdiction of circuit courts over probate courts, does not include appeals concerning certificates of redemption. However, our supreme court recently recognized that a circuit court has jurisdiction to adjudicate petitions for a writ of mandamus involving the denial of a certificate of redemption. See Ross v. Rosen-Rager, 67 So.3d 29, 38 (Ala. 2010) (citing Boyd v. Holt, 62 Ala. 296 (1878)) (refusal of the probate judge to issue a certificate of redemption for land sold for taxes was reviewable in the circuit court by a petition for a writ of mandamus).”

Wall to Wall Props. v. Cadence Bank, NA, 163 So.3d 384, 388 (Ala. Civ. App. 2014). See also Franks v. Norfolk S. Ry. Co., 679 So.2d 214, 216 (Ala. 1996)(“Orders as to which no statute grants appellate jurisdiction are reviewed on petitions for writ , of certiorari, mandamus, or prohibition.”). “All orders, judgments and decrees of probate courts shall be accorded the same validity and presumptions which are accorded to judgments and orders of other courts of general jurisdiction.” § 12-13-1(c), Ala.' Code 1975. A petition for “a writ of mandamus is the proper method for vacating an order that a ... court had no authority to enter.” Alabama Dep’t of Mental Health & Mental Retardation v. State, 718 So.2d 74, 75 (Ala. Civ. App. 1998).

The Surginers did not file a petition for the writ of mandamus challenging the probate court’s January 26, 2009, judgment issuing the certificate of redemption, nor did they attempt to appeal the probate court’s judgment. Instead, the Surginers filed a complaint for declaratory, relief in the trial court, seeking a judgment from the trial court vacating the certificate of redemption previously issued by the probate court and thereby quieting title to the Surginers. Our supreme court has recognized that the substance of a pleading, not the label attached, to it by .a party, controls. See Century 21 Paramount Real Estate, Inc. v. Hometown Realty, LLC, 34 So.3d 658, 662 (Ala. 2009). Assuming, without deciding, that the underlying declaratory-judgment action could be , construed as a petition for a writ of .mandamus, the Surginers did not name the probate judge as a respondent. See Ex parte Privett, 887 So.2d 854, 856 (Ala. 2004)(denying a petition for a writ of mandamus in part .because the petitioner named the incorrect judge as a respondent and that judge owed no duty or responsibility to petitioner); Ex parte State Pers. Bd., 45 So.3d 751, 754 (Ala. 2010)(holding that trial court lacked authority to restrict the actions of a non-party State agency); and J.A.W. v. G.H., 72 So.3d 1254, 1257 (Ala. Civ. App. 2011) (‘When a court lacks jurisdiction over a person, any order directed at that person is void.”).

This court requested letter briefs from the parties on the issue whether they had properly invoked the trial court’s jurisdiction, whether a petition for a writ of mandamus was required to be filed in the trial court, and whether the probate, judge should have been joined in the proceedings. In response, the parties referred' this coqrt to the general equity powers of the circuit court to quiet title and asserted that the case at hand involves Roberts’s attempt to judicially redeem the property, presumably asserted through her counterclaim. Although we agree that a circuit court has jurisdiction to entertain those types of actions, the complaint and portions of the counterclaim seek to invalidate or enforce, respectively, the probate court’s judgment issuing a certificate of redemption. The probate court has exclusive jurisdiction over the statutory-redemption process. Ex parte Foundation Bank, 146 So.3d 1, 6 (Ala. 2013). The circuit court does not have jurisdiction over the statutory-redemption process, except to review' a probate court’s judgment through the filing of a petition for the writ of mandamus, and that was not done in this case. Therefore, to the extent that either the Surginers or Roberts sought to have the trial court address the certifícate qf redemption issued by the probate court, the trial court was without jurisdiction to do so. Nevertheless, the trial court considered issues related to judicial redemption, and the parties have presented this appeal as involving only issues relating to judicial redemption. Accordingly, we will analyze only the issues as framed by the parties in thip appeal. See Chamblee v. Duncan, 188 So.3d 682, 687 (Ala. Civ. App. 2015)(ex-plaining that appellate review is limited to the theory upon which the parties agreed to try the case below).

Judicial redemption provides a mechanism by which a party may redeem property sold for the failure to pay ad valorem taxes. See §§ 40-10-82 and 40-10-83, Ala. Code 1975. See First Props., L.L.C. v. Bennett, 959 So.2d 653, 654 (Ala. Civ. App. 2006)(“ ‘[Jjudicial redemption’ ... involves the filing of an original civil action against a tax-sale purchaser (or the filing of a counterclaim in an ejectment action brought by that purchaser) and the payment of specified sums into the court in which that action or counterclaim is pending.”).

The Surginers do not assert that Roberts was not entitled .to judicial redemption, and, therefore, we will not address whether she was in the position to judicially redeem the property following the probate court’s issuance of the certificate of redemption. Instead, the Surginers assert that the trial court committed reversible error by failing to include interest and the cost of preservation improvements in the redemption amount Roberts was ordered to pay.

In support of their argument that the trial court failed to include interest from the date of the tax sale, the Surginers cite only a portion of § 40-10-83, specifically, the portion providing that “the court shall ... ascertain (i) the amount paid by the purchaser at the sale and of the taxes subsequently paid by the purchaser, together with 12 percent per annum thereon.” The Surginers further assert that “[t]he undisputed amount due under this section is $28,487.12. As the amount set by the trial court did not include interest at 12% per annum as to the undisputed amounts paid by [the Surgin-ers], the calculation of this portion of the redemption amount is incorrect as a matter of law.” In its orders entered on March 9, 2016, and May 10, 2016, the trial court ordered Roberts to pay the Surginers $19,229.47, which the trial court noted reflected the purchase price and taxes paid by the Surginers and interest at a rate of 12 percent per annum. The Surginers did not challenge the trial court’s calculations or the amount Roberts was ordered to pay.

“This court is confined in its review to the arguments presented to the trial court: ‘[o]ur review is limited to the issues that were before the trial court— an issue raised on appeal must have first been presented to and ruled on by the trial court.’ Norman v. Bozeman, 605 So.2d 1210, 1214 (Ala. 1992). Moreover, this court is confined in its review to addressing the arguments raised by the parties in their briefs on appeal; arguments not raised by the parties are waived. Boshell v. Keith, 418 So.2d 89, 92-93 (Ala. 1982).”

Gary v. Crouch, 923 So.2d 1130, 1135-36 (Ala. Civ. App. 2005). See also Rodriguez-Ramos v. J. Thomas Williams, Jr., M.D., P.C., 580 So.2d 1326, 1328 (Ala. 1991)(An appellate court “cannot put a trial court in error for failing to consider a matter which, according to the record, was not presented to, nor decided by it.”).

Even if the Surginers had properly challenged the trial court’s calculations, they do not demonstrate on appeal that the trial court’s calculations or award are incorrect. The Surginers do not direct this court to any authority in support of, or otherwise demonstrate any error on the part of the trial court in calculating, the sum due. “The appellant has an affirmative duty to demonstrate error on the part of the trial court; this court will not presume such error exists.” Hollon v. Williamson, 846 So.2d 349, 353 (Ala. Civ. App. 2002) (citing Greer v. Greer, 624 So.2d 1076, 1077 (Ala. Civ. App. 1993); and Perkins v. Perkins, 465 So.2d 414 (Ala. Civ. App. 1984)).

The Surginers also challenge the trial court’s decision to exclude the value of any improvements the Surginers purportedly made to preserve the property. Pursuant to § 40-10-83,

“the court shall, on motion of the defendant made at any time before the trial of the action, ascertain ... (iii) with respect to any property which contains a residential structure at the time of the sale regardless of its location ... the value of all preservation improvements made by the purchaser determined in accordance with Section 40-10-122, together with 12 percent per annum thereon, subject to the limitations set forth in Section 40-10-122(a) .... ”

The Surginers assert that Roberts did not follow the procedure outlined in § 40-10-122(d), Ala. Code 1975, regarding notice and the appointment of a referee to determine the value of preservation improvements. We observe, however, that the Sur-giners failed to follow that procedure as well. Regardless, pursuant to § 40-10-122(e), Ala. Code 1975, “the appropriate court shall proceed to ascertain the true value of such permanent or preservation improvements as applicable” if the parties fail to follow the procedure in § 40-10-122(d).

The trial court declined to award the Surginers any amount for purported preservation improvements after a trial at which ore tenus testimony was received in order to resolve this factually disputed issue; therefore, the ore tenus standard of review applies.

“Our ore tenus standard of review is well settled. ‘ “When a judge in a nonju-ry case hears oral testimony, a judgment based on findings of fact based on that testimony will be presumed correct and will not be disturbed on appeal except for a plain and palpable error.” ’ Smith v. Muchia, 854 So.2d 85, 92 (Ala. 2003) (quoting Allstate Ins. Co. v. Skelton, 675 So.2d 377, 379 (Ala. 1996)).”

Kennedy v. Boles Invs., Inc., 53 So.3d 60, 67-68 (Ala. 2010). The Surginers assert that they presented evidence indicating that the value of preservation improvements was $81,458.72. During the trial, however, Roberts’s expert testified that poor workmanship was used in the repairs claimed as preservation improvements and that issues relating to plumbing and electrical hazards, among other issues, would have to be addressed, which negatively impacted the value of the property. After the trial, the trial court appointed an independent appraiser who found that,

“[a]fter careful review of the all the facts, inspecting- the above referenced property, ... having licensed contractors review the quality of work and quality of improvements, weighing the current and potential fire and safety hazards, and reviewing the. sales of similar properties in the marketf, i]t is my opinion that the. current improvements negatively impact the subject property’s value due to the poor craftsmanship, inferior materials used, poor design, potential fire and safety hazards, and significant water damage the new improvements have caused and continue to cause to the property; therefore the contributory value of the improvements made to the above reference property is $0.00.”

“ ‘ “The [ore tenus] rule applies to '‘disputed issues of fact,’ whether the dispute is based entirely upon oral testimony or upon a combination of oral testimony and documentary evidence.”’” Kennedy, 53 So.3d at 68 (quoting Reed v. Board of Trs. for Alabama State Univ., 778 So.2d 791, 795 (Ala. 2000), quoting in turn Raidt v. Crane, 342 So.2d 358, 360. (Ala. 1977)). “Under the contradictory testimony, it-was within the special province of the trial court to determine both the weight and the credibility to be accorded to the testimony of each witness.” Wiggins v. Brown, 391 So.2d 128, 129 (Ala. Civ. App. 1980). The trial court acted within its discretion in choosing to believe the testimony of two appraisers in deciding that the “preservation improvements” performed by the Surginers negatively impacted the- value of the property and, thus, that they were not entitled to recover for the purported preservation improvements. The Surginers have not directed this court to any authority that requires the trial court to award a sum for preservation improvements despite the trial court’s determination that those improvements have no value. Accordingly, the Surginers have not demonstrated a basis for reversal of the trial court’s judgment,and the judgment is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

Thompson, P.J., and Eittman, Thomas, and Moore, JJ., concur.

      . Documentation regarding the property is recorded in Deed Book M, page 447, of the probate records of Wilcox County, in which the property is identified as Wilcox County tax-parcel number 28-01-11-0-000-010.000 #0 and parcel number 28 — 01—12— 0000.003000 #0; the property is further described in the tax deed recorded in Deed Book 11E, page 483, of the probate records of Wilcox County.

      . As .previously noted, the record indicates that John purchased the property at a tax sale; the record does not contain an explanation for the-joint conveyance to John and Jeffrey.

      . The trial court entered an identical order on June 7, 201'6,

      . Although the trial court did not have jurisdiction to address the validity of the certificate of redemption issued by the probate .court, the portion of the judgment addressing judicial redemption ⅛ still valid. See, e.g., 50 C.J.S. Judgments § 756 (2009)(footnotes omitted)("[A] judgment may be valid in part and void in part where the parts which are valid and void are separable[, and] [t]he fact that part of the judgment is void ,.. does not necessarily invalidate the entire judgment.”).


text:
    James Willis BONDS v. STATE
    CR-12-1729
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/31/2016
   Reversed and remanded after remand by the United States Supreme Court.


text:
    Antonio FLYNN v. STATE
    CR-12-1817
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/04/2016
   Reversed and remanded after remand by the United States Supreme Court.


text:
    William Thomas KNOTTS v. STATE
    CR-12-1861
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/30/2016
   Reversed and remanded after remand by the United States Supreme Court.


text:
    Brian R. STOREY v. STATE
    CR-12-1942
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/11/2016
   Reversed and remanded after remand by the United States Supreme Court.


text:
    Keith L. MATTHEWS v. STATE
    CR-12-1943
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/29/2016
   Reversed and remanded after remand by the United States Supreme Court.


text:
    Clayton Joel FLOWERS v. STATE
    CR-12-1958
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/29/2016
   Reversed and remanded after remand by the United States Supreme Court.


text:
    Brandon Solomon FOSTER v. STATE
    CR-12-1982
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/30/2016
   Reversed and remanded after remand by the United States Supreme Court.


text:
    Nicholas IIAMS v. STATE
    CR-12-2038
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/31/2016
   Reversed and remanded after remand by the United States Supreme Court.


text:
    Richard FORMAN v. STATE
    CR-12-2039
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/30/2016
   Reversed and remanded after remand by the United States Supreme Court.


text:
    Willie Lizzlie GARDNER v. STATE
    CR-12-2110
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/31/2016
   ■Reversed and remanded after remand by the United States Supreme Court.


text:
    Emanuel MCWILLIAMS v. STATE
    CR-12-2111
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/29/2016
   Reversed and remanded after remand by the-United .States Supreme Court.


text:
    Renaldo Chante ADAMS v. STATE
    CR-13-0029
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/04/2016
   Reversed and; remanded after remand by the United States Supreme Court.


text:
    Charles Eugene BLACK v. STATE
    CR-13-0041
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/31/2016
   Reversed and remanded after remand by the United States Supreme Court.


text:
    Gerald Homer INGRAM, Jr. v. STATE
    CR-13-0062
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/11/2016
   Reversed- and remanded after remand by the United States Supreme Court.


text:
    Harris P. WILSON v. STATE
    CR-13-0130
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/11/2016
   Reversed and remanded after remand by the United States Supreme Court.


text:
    Julius REEVES v. STATE
    CR-13-0323
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/04/2016
   Reversed and remanded after remand by the United States Supreme Court.


text:
    Dennis DUNLAP v. STATE
    CR-13-0380
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/11/2016
   Reversed and remanded after remand by the United States Supreme Court.


text:
    Timothy STUBBS v. STATE
    CR-13-0867
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/04/2016
   Reversed and remanded after remand by the United States Supreme Court.


text:
    Earnest Jerome HOGAN v. STATE
    CR-13-0881
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/30/2016
   Reversed and remanded after remand by the United States Supreme Court.


text:
    Nathan SLATON v. STATE
    CR-13-1367
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/31/2016
   Reversed and remanded after remand by the United States Supreme Court.


text:
    Michael Shawn BARNES v. STATE
    CR-13-1567
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/29/2016
   Reversed and remanded after remand by the United States Supreme Court.


text:
    Michael Shawn BARNES v. STATE
    CR-13-1568
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/29/2016
   Reversed and remanded after remand by the United States Supreme Court.'


text:
    Albert BAKER, Jr. v. STATE
    CR-13-1900
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/30/2016
   Reversed and remanded after remand by the United States Supreme Court.


text:
    Mark Anthony DUKE v. STATE
    CR-14-0063
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/11/2016
   Reversed and remanded after remand by the United States Supreme Court.


text:
    Marcus Dewayne PRESSLEY v. STATE
    CR-14-0096
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/30/2016
   Reversed and remanded after remand by the United States Supreme Court.


text:
    Tivon Rollie THOMAS v. STATE
    CR-14-0228
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
   Reh. denied.


text:
    Hazel Deann Kendrick STONE and Raymond Davis Stone, Jr. v. STATE
    CR-14-0497
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
    Reh. denied 09/09/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    C.E.M. v. STATE
    CR-14-0577
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
    Reh. denied 08/12/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Kennith Earl GEORGE v. STATE
    CR-14-0615
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/19/2016
   Reh. denied,


text:
    Desmonte Demontez LEONARD v. STATE
    CR-14-0810
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
    Reh. denied 07/29/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Jisun YUN v. STATE
    CR-14-0821
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
   Reh. denied.


text:
    B.W.G. and K.R. v. STATE
    CR-14-1025
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/15/2016
   Reh. denied.


text:
    Suzanne BENNISON v. STATE
    CR-14-1035
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
    Reh. denied 09/16/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Darryl J. DIXON v. STATE
    CR-14-1078
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
   Reh, denied; memo of 04/22/2016 withdrawn; memo substituted; affirmed.


text:
    Lonnie Lee COLBURN v. STATE
    CR-14-1143
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/04/2016
   Dismissed.


text:
    Moses JACKSON v. STATE
    CR-14-1166
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
    Reh. denied 07/15/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Leon CAVER v. STATE
    CR-14-1171
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/08/2016
   Reh. denied.


text:
    Vincent Lovelace LOWE v. STATE
    CR-14-1239
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    09/02/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Stefranio Keith HAMPTON v. STATE
    CR-14-1263
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Demarcus Antonio KENT v. STATE
    CR-14-1347
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/08/2016
   Reh. denied.


text:
    Bryan Douglas CANNON v. STATE
    CR-14-1352
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
    Reh. denied 08/19/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Jarvis Felix TERRY v. STATE
    CR-14-1379
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/08/2016
   Reh. denied.


text:
    John Denver PEGG v. STATE
    CR-14-1384
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
    Reh. denied 08/26/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    T.T.H. v. STATE
    CR-14-1426
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
   Reh. denied; memo of 04/22/2016 withdrawn; memo substituted; affirmed.


text:
    Cedric Devon LOWE v. STATE
    CR-14-1444
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
    Reh. denied 08/26/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    J.R.H. v. STATE
    CR-14-1474
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Terrence Lamont ALLEN v. STATE
    CR-14-1487
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Willie A. BROOKS, Jr. v. STATE
    CR-14-1506
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Justin LOTT v. STATE
    CR-14-1518
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
    Reh. denied 08/26/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Jamaar TAYLOR v. STATE
    CR-14-1524
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
    Reh. denied 07/22/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    E.S.M. v. STATE
    CR-14-1529
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
    Reh. denied 08/12/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Kevin WRENN v. STATE
    CR-14-1535
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
    Reh. denied 09/02/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Mitchell MARBURY v. STATE
    CR-14-1545
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
    Reh. denied 08/12/2016
   Affirmed,


text:
    Shane Robert TEETER v. STATE
    CR-14-1571
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
   Affirmed,


text:
    Tony Randall WOODS v. STATE
    CR-14-1594
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
   Reh. denied; memo of 02/05/2016 withdrawn; memo substituted; ■ affirmed.


text:
    William Peter WITWICKI v. STATE
    CR-14-1599
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Charles Curtis HART v. STATE
    CR-14-1607
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
    Reh. denied 07/29/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Nathan WILLIAMS v. STATE
    CR-14-1641
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Arthur Lee HALL v. STATE
    CR-14-1649
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
   Dismissed.


text:
    Enrico Morris CORNLEY v. STATE
    CR-14-1653
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
    Reh. denied 07/22/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Christopher Lawrence FARRO v. STATE
    CR-14-1655
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/15/2016
   Reh. denied.


text:
    William Joseph JOHNSON v. STATE
    CR-14-1659
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
    Reh. denied 08/26/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Timothy BARNETT v. STATE
    CR-14-1672
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Tresvon Tyrone SPENCER v. STATE
    CR-14-1673
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
    Reh. denied 08/26/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    P.A.T. v. STATE
    CR-14-1693
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Olivia Lee REYNOLDS v. STATE
    CR-14-1726
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
    Reh. denied 09/02/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Ukee Rashaud KNOWLES v. STATE
    CR-14-1737
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
    Reh. denied 09/02/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Olusola Amimbola KUPONIYI v. STATE
    CR-14-1739
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
    Reh. denied 08/12/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Everett Emerson CORNETT, Jr. v. STATE
    CR-14-1745
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Alex Demetrius MCMILLIAN v. STATE
    CR-14-1757
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
    Reh. denied 08/26/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Cornelius Deunte WEBSTER v. STATE
    CR-15-0004
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Ricky Jerome PADGETT v. STATE
    CR-15-0021
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
    Reh. denied 07/22/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Robert Beecher SHEPPARD v. STATE
    CR-15-0030
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
    Reh. denied 09/02/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Britnea Leann MYERS v. STATE
    CR-15-0040
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    09/02/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Robert Mate TAYLOR v. STATE
    CR-15-0071
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
    Reh. denied 08/12/2016
   Affirmed


text:
    Shawn L. ADKISON v. STATE
    CR-15-0075
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Zachery THIGPEN v. STATE
    CR-15-0083
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/08/2016
   Reh. denied.


text:
    Marquita Katrice SIMMONS v. STATE
    CR-15-0090
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
   Affirmed,


text:
    King Aron WILLIAMS v. STATE
    CR-15-0102
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
    Reh. denied 09/02/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Lauren Brooke BAKER v. STATE
    CR-15-0110
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Heather Marie Coomey SHIRAH v. STATE
    CR-15-0135
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/29/2016
    Reh. denied 08/19/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Floreese Fuqua HODGES v. STATE
    CR-15-0143
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
   Reh. denied.


text:
    George Walter PRESLEY v. STATE
    CR-15-0145
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
    Reh. denied 08/12/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Jimmy Lee WEBB v. ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
    CR-15-0163
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
    Reh. denied 08/12/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Randal Gene MARTIN v. STATE
    CR-15-0166
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/18/2016
   Reversed and remanded.


text:
    Roderick DANCY v. STATE
    CR-15-0169
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Brandon Keith WILLIAMS v. STATE
    CR-15-0179
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
    Reh. denied 08/26/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Philip Shawn PAYTON v. CITY OF FLORENCE
    CR-15-0180
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
    Reh. denied 09/09/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Shannon Dewayne NIXON v. STATE
    CR-15-0184
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
   Dismissed.


text:
    George Pernell COLE v. STATE
    CR-15-0191
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    09/02/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Omahr GREGORY v. STATE
    CR-15-0197
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    09/02/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Bilal Uz ZAMAN v. STATE
    CR-15-0198
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Stephen Gerard ENNIS v. STATE
    CR-15-0205
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Johnny Shannon FUTRAL v. STATE
    CR-15-0213
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
    Reh. denied 08/12/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Patrick Young Blake BALLARD v. STATE
    CR-15-0215
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
    Reh. denied 09/02/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Eugene Wallace BLACK v. STATE
    CR-15-0226
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    09/02/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Brent Lee GAILEY v. STATE
    CR-15-0231
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    C.A.D. v. STATE
    CR-15-0232
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Jerrod Tramell THOMPSON v. STATE
    CR-15-0242
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    J.M.P. v. STATE
    CR-15-0251
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    09/02/2016
    Reh. denied 09/16/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Robert WHITMAN v. STATE
    CR-15-0253
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    09/01/2016
    Reh. denied 09/16/2016
   Reversed and remanded.


text:
    James Samuel HOWARD v. STATE
    CR-15-0255
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Dontavius Devon JONES v. STATE
    CR-15-0259
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    09/02/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    James Thomas STIMPSON v. STATE
    CR-15-0262
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/15/2016
   Reh. denied.


text:
    Charles Auther MOORE v. STATE
    CR-15-0279
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
   Reh. denied. (Although this case is docketed as indicated, the unpublished memorandum issued by the Court of Criminal Appeals indicates that this defendant’s name is Charles Arthur Moore.)


text:
    D.A.M. v. STATE
    CR-15-0283
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Marlon Arell MANSON v. STATE
    CR-15-0286
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    09/02/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Raymond Shane GREENE v. STATE
    CR-15-0288
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    09/02/2016
    Reh. denied 09/23/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Antonio JERIDO v. STATE
    CR-15-0289
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Charles Sanchase WHITE v. STATE
    CR-15-0290
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
   Affirmed (memo withdrawn 10/21/2016; see opinion at 227 So.3d 541).


text:
    Benny Joe OWENS v. STATE
    CR-15-0293
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Todd Jeffrey GATES v. STATE
    CR-15-0302
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/12/2016
   Reversed and remanded.


text:
    Rodney Darryl KING v. STATE
    CR-15-0305
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
    Reh. denied 07/29/2016
   Affirmed,


text:
    Ronald Odell KING v. STATE
    CR-15-0306
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    09/02/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Malcolm X JONES v. STATE
    CR-15-0308
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
    Reh. denied 08/19/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Martavious Lashawn JONES v. STATE
    CR-15-0324
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Nathaniel Lee BAKER v. STATE
    CR-15-0325
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Jerwaske MACK v. STATE
    CR-15-0326
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    J.W. v. STATE
    CR-15-0329
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    09/02/2016
    Reh. denied 09/23/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Garlington Eugene FAUCETT v. STATE
    CR-15-0330
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Gregory Stephen GRAY, Jr. v. STATE
    CR-15-0331
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/29/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    B.D.K. v. STATE
    CR-15-0337
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Terrance SWAIN v. STATE
    CR-15-0344
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
    Reh. denied 07/15/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Mendy Wood KENT v. STATE
    CR-15-0347
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    09/02/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Jessie James STEWART v. STATE
    CR-15-0349
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Demericon Alex WILLIAMS v. STATE
    CR-15-0350
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
    Reh. denied 09/02/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Christopher Allan ELKINS v. STATE
    CR-15-0351
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    09/02/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Buck HITT v. STATE
    CR-15-0358
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
    Reh. denied 09/02/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Jeremy Lawrence BAKER v. STATE
    CR-15-0359
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
   Reh. denied.


text:
    Emanuel BRYANT v. STATE
    CR-15-0361
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    09/02/2016
    Reh. denied 09/23/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Amy Bishop ANDERSON v. STATE
    CR-15-0362
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
    Reh. denied 09/02/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Leon Bud HOTCHKISS v. STATE
    CR-15-0368
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
    Reh. denied 09/02/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    W.J.C. v. STATE
    CR-15-0370
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Joseph MCADAMS v. STATE
    CR-15-0373
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Corey HENDERSON v. STATE
    CR-15-0376
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
   Reh. denied.


text:
    Michael GARCIA v. STATE
    CR-15-0377
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Ronald Lamar BOWMAN v. STATE
    CR-15-0388
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/06/2016
    Reh. denied 07/22/2016
   Dismissed.


text:
    Cedric Tremell GREEN a/k/a Cedric Tremell Briggs v. STATE
    CR-15-0391
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/29/2016
   Dismissed.


text:
    Marcus F. MILLER v. STATE
    CR-15-0392
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
    Reh. denied 09/02/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Arthur James WADDELL, Jr. v. STATE
    CR-15-0396
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    T.J.M. v. STATE
    CR-15-0406
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
    Reh. denied 07/15/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    K.H.S., Jr. v. STATE
    CR-15-0407
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
    Reh. denied 08/26/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    David Randall POYNER v. STATE
    CR-15-0408
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
    Reh. denied 09/02/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Sandy BROWN, Jr. v. STATE
    CR-15-0409
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    K.C. v. STATE
    CR-15-0411
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Carl Bernard KENNEDY v. STATE
    CR-15-0428
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    09/02/2016
    Reh. denied 09/23/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Kenquarius HOLLOWAY v. STATE
    CR-15-0430
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
    Reh. denied 09/09/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Kinwen L. STALLWORTH v. STATE
    CR-15-0433
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    09/02/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    John WILSON III v. STATE
    CR-15-0436
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    09/02/2016
    Reh. denied 09/30/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    John WILSON III v. STATE
    CR-15-0437
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
    Reh. denied 07/22/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    James Edward WALLACE v. STATE
    CR-15-0443
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Dedric Jamar DEAN v. STATE
    CR-15-0448
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    09/02/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Daniel Jesus MARTIN v. STATE
    CR-15-0450
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
    Reh. denied 07/29/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    David Luverne PITTS v. STATE
    CR-15-0453
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
    Reh. denied 08/12/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    John David HUGHES v. STATE
    CR-15-0454
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
    Reh. denied 07/29/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Taylor WILSON v. STATE
    CR-15-0458
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
    Reh. denied 08/26/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Michael KILLEEN v. STATE
    CR-15-0465
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Randy Joe CHANNEL v. STATE
    CR-15-0466
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Rey ROSARIO v. STATE
    CR-15-0469
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Monteze Ray SALES v. STATE
    CR-15-0470
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Randall Timothy DOWNS v. STATE
    CR-15-0471
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Vito Tanorris GILMER v. STATE
    CR-15-0478
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Charles David BUCK v. STATE
    CR-15-0480
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Stanley Riley CLEMMONS v. STATE
    CR-15-0483
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
    Reh. denied 08/26/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Edward Wilson KYTTLE v. STATE
    CR-15-0484
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    09/26/2016
   Dismissed.


text:
    Cedric BANKS v. STATE
    CR-15-0496
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Robert Anthony MEYER v. STATE
    CR-15-0497
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Rashad Malik SPENCER v. STATE
    CR-15-0498
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Willie Joe GRANT v. STATE
    CR-15-0499
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
    Reh. denied 07/29/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Carlos Demond HAMPTON v. STATE
    CR-15-0500
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/08/2016
   Reh. denied.


text:
    Roderick B. REESE v. ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
    CR-15-0502
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
    Reh. denied 07/22/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Vernon Levell GUY v. STATE
    CR-15-0514
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Ray McKenzie MONTGOMERY v. STATE
    CR-15-0521
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    T.M.B. v. STATE
    CR-15-0522
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    C.J.K. v. STATE
    CR-15-0537
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Anthony L. BROWN v. STATE
    CR-15-0539
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
   Reh. denied.


text:
    D.P. v. STATE
    CR-15-0543
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
    Reh. denied 07/29/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Adam Troy HALEY v. STATE
    CR-15-0546
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/03/2016
   Dismissed.


text:
    Donald L. LEWIS v. ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
    CR-15-0547
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Drapher Oneal BONMAN v. STATE
    CR-15-0552
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    09/02/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Charles Jamal NEWMAN v. STATE
    CR-15-0554
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    EX PARTE William W. HORSMAN III
    CR-15-0557
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/22/2016
   Mand. pet. denied.


text:
    EX PARTE Moneek M. ACKLES
    CR-15-0562
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/22/2016
   Mand. pet. dismissed.


text:
    EX PARTE Bobby Dale MCKINSTRY
    CR-15-0567
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/22/2016
   Mand. pet. denied.


text:
    EX PARTE Corrage Cedrekus CALLOWAY
    CR-15-0570
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/22/2016
   Mand. pet. denied.


text:
    Keith Demarc EDWARDS v. STATE
    CR-15-0576
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
    Reh. denied 09/02/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Travis Austin SESSIONS v. STATE
    CR-15-0581
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Stacy Oneal JOHNSON v. STATE
    CR-15-0582
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Akeem Amadi JOHNSON v. STATE
    CR-15-0586
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
    Reh. denied 09/02/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    EX PARTE Carl D. HUTTO
    CR-15-0587
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/22/2016
    Reh. denied 08/31/2016
   Mand. pet. denied.


text:
    Adrian STEWART v. STATE
    CR-15-0590
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Antonio CUNNINGHAM v. ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
    CR-15-0594
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    EX PARTE Paul Eugene BAILEY
    CR-15-0599
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/22/2016
   Mand. pet. denied.


text:
    Richard Conway DOBBINS v. STATE
    CR-15-0600
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    09/02/2016
    Reh. denied 09/23/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Maylon Shawn HARVEY v. STATE
    CR-15-0617
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Bryan Keith MCDANIEL v. STATE
    CR-15-0628
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    09/02/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    EX PARTE Aloysius Thaddeus HENRY
    CR-15-0629
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/24/2016
   Mand. pet. dismissed.


text:
    EX PARTE Robert W. CROSHON
    CR-15-0631
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/22/2016
   Mand. pet. denied.


text:
    Johnathan David ROGERS v. STATE
    CR-15-0634
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Jimmy COLLINS v. STATE
    CR-15-0635
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/12/2016
    Reh. denied 09/16/2016
   Dismissed.


text:
    Willie Joe GRANT v. STATE
    CR-15-0636
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/22/2016
   Dismissed.


text:
    EX PARTE Ronnie FAGAN
    CR-15-0638
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/22/2016
   Mand. pet. denied.


text:
    Freddie Buford WALKER v. STATE
    CR-15-0641
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Larry MCGEE v. STATE
    CR-15-0642
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    09/02/2016
    Reh. denied 09/30/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    EX PARTE James KENDRICK
    CR-15-0645
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/24/2016
   Mand. pet. granted.


text:
    S.P.S. v. STATE
    CR-15-0648
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Johnny Marion BROWN v. STATE
    CR-15-0649
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Richard BELSER v. STATE
    CR-15-0650
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/29/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    EX PARTE Clyde ANDERSON, Jr.
    CR-15-0653
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/06/2016
   Reh. denied.


text:
    EX PARTE Ivan METCALF
    CR-15-0654
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    09/12/2016
   Mand. pet. denied.


text:
    Robert Anthony JOHNSON v. STATE
    CR-15-0655
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
    Reh. denied 07/29/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Melanie Kym CHAPMAN v. STATE
    CR-15-0659
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
    Reh. denied 07/22/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Gerald D. BREWSTER v. ALABAMA BOARD OF PARDONS & PAROLES
    CR-15-0661
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
    Reh. denied 07/29/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Alan Dewayne SHELTON v. STATE
    CR-15-0665
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    EX PARTE Terry Lee WYNN
    CR-15-0668
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/24/2016
   Mand. pet. dismissed.


text:
    EX PARTE Aven COTTON
    CR-15-0669
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    09/13/2016
   Reh. denied.


text:
    Robert Lamar VAUGHN v. STATE
    CR-15-0670
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Kamal Tauheed RUSSAW v. STATE
    CR-15-0673
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Robert LEVERT v. STATE
    CR-15-0676
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    09/02/2016
    Reh. denied 09/16/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Michael Davis WILLIAMS v. STATE
    CR-15-0677
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
    Reh. denied 07/15/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Buddy Lee CRAFT v. STATE
    CR-15-0678
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    09/02/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    EX PARTE Richard HENLEY
    CR-15-0679
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/22/2016
   Mand. pet. denied.


text:
    Derrick Conelious THOMAS v. STATE
    CR-15-0683
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Trebell MCCALL v. ALABAMA BOARD OF PARDONS & PAROLES
    CR-15-0685
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
    Reh. denied 09/02/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Demetrius MINNIEFIELD v. STATE
    CR-15-0686
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/01/2016
   Dismissed.


text:
    EX PARTE Thomas L. ARMSTRONG
    CR-15-0687
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/22/2016
   Mand. pet. denied.


text:
    EX PARTE Antonio JERIDO
    CR-15-0689
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/22/2016
   Mand. pet. dismissed.


text:
    EX PARTE Ronnie Leon THOMAS
    CR-15-0690
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/22/2016
   Mand. pet. denied.


text:
    Calvin MASSEY v. ALABAMA BOARD OF PARDONS & PAROLES
    CR-15-0695
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
    Reh. denied 07/29/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Robert BROWN v. ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
    CR-15-0696
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
    Reh. denied 09/02/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Joe LANDRUM v. ALABAMA BOARD OF PARDONS & PAROLES
    CR-15-0697
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
    Reh. denied 08/19/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Vincent LAMPKIN v. STATE
    CR-15-0698
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
    Reh. denied 09/09/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Emil Lajuan CHAPMAN v. ALABAMA BOARD OF PARDONS & PAROLES
    CR-15-0709
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
    Reh. denied 07/22/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    EX PARTE Tyrone TRIPLETT
    CR-15-0718
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/24/2016
   Mand. pet. dismissed.


text:
    Nicholas Dale PIPER v. STATE
    CR-15-0719
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Kassey Bernard REEDY v. STATE
    CR-15-0720
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    09/02/2016
    Reh. denied 09/23/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    EX PARTE Weldon BERRY, Jr.
    CR-15-0722
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/23/2016
   Mand. pet.' dismissed.


text:
    Orlando S. MCKEITHEN v. ALABAMA BOARD OF PARDONS & PAROLES
    CR-15-0724
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
    Reh. denied 09/02/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Anthony ADAMS v. STATE
    CR-15-0725
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Michael Brett MCCLAIN v. STATE
    CR-15-0726
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    09/16/2016
   Dismissed.


text:
    EX PARTE Carlotta S. KUTSCHENREUTER
    CR-15-0727
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/23/2016
   Mand. pet. denied.


text:
    Jeffrey Wayne TAYLOR v. STATE
    CR-15-0731
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/23/2016
   Dismissed.


text:
    EX PARTE Tony WILLIAMS
    CR-15-0744
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/23/2016
   Mand. pet. dismissed.


text:
    Adarryle LEWIS v. STATE
    CR-15-0749
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    09/02/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Bennie McEarl CARTER v. STATE
    CR-15-0753
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/29/2016
    Reh. denied 08/26/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Ernest Lee WALKER v. STATE
    CR-15-0755
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    09/02/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Luther GRUBBS, Jr. v. STATE
    CR-15-0756
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/31/2016
   Dismissed.


text:
    Jason Lynn CORDELL v. STATE
    CR-15-0759
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/24/2016
   Dismissed.


text:
    Terry TATUM v. STATE
    CR-15-0761
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    DeJuan SIGLER v. STATE
    CR-15-0764
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Donald Ray LAWRENCE v. STATE
    CR-15-0765
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
    Reh. denied 07/29/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Woodburck NOE v. STATE
    CR-15-0773
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/05/2016
   Reh. denied.


text:
    Eric Andre JAMES v. STATE
    CR-15-0776
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    09/02/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    EX PARTE Aaron Lamont JOHNSON
    CR-15-0778
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/23/2016
   Mand. pet. denied.


text:
    John Christopher HOLMAN v. STATE
    CR-15-0781
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/23/2016
   Dismissed.


text:
    EX PARTE James Henry JACKSON
    CR-15-0782
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/05/2016
   Reh. denied.


text:
    EX PARTE Michael WEBB
    CR-15-0784
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/23/2016
   Mand. pet. dismissed.


text:
    EX PARTE Robert GRIFFIN
    CR-15-0786
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/24/2016
   Mand. pet. denied.


text:
    Sean CHEESEBORO v. ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
    CR-15-0787
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
    Reh. denied 07/29/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Darrell DONALDSON v. STATE
    CR-15-0793
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    09/02/2016
    Reh. denied 09/30/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Curtis MITCHELL v. ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
    CR-15-0798
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/01/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Michael A. BLACK v. ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
    CR-15-0802
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/29/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Cedric MCCULLOUGH v. ALABAMA BOARD OF PARDONS & PAROLES
    CR-15-0803
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Michael Leon POWE v. STATE
    CR-15-0808
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    EX PARTE James CREWS
    CR-15-0809
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/24/2016
   Mand. pet. dismissed.


text:
    EX PARTE Dave THOMAS
    CR-15-0811
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/24/2016
   Mand. pet. dismissed.


text:
    EX PARTE Carlos Edward KENNEDY
    CR-15-0812
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/23/2016
   Mand. pet. dismissed.


text:
    Terrence Tyree EDWARDS v. STATE
    CR-15-0816
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
    Reh. denied 09/02/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Antkwun PINKSTON v. STATE
    CR-15-0821
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    EX PARTE Willie Arthur JACKSON
    CR-15-0823
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/24/2016
   Mand. pet. dismissed.


text:
    Tony Wayne MCELYEA v. STATE
    CR-15-0829
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    09/02/2016
    Reh. denied 09/23/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    EX PARTE Cornelius Bernard JOHNSON
    CR-15-0833
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/24/2016
   Mand. pet. dismissed.


text:
    Nathaniel Patrick BAZZEL v. STATE
    CR-15-0835
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
    Reh. denied 09/02/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Rickey Glenn LANFORD v. STATE
    CR-15-0837
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    09/02/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    EX PARTE Jonathan ASKEW
    CR-15-0838
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/24/2016
   Mand. pet. denied.


text:
    Donald BISHOP v. STATE
    CR-15-0839
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/29/2016
   Dismissed.


text:
    W.G.M. v. STATE
    CR-15-0840
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    09/02/2016
    Reh. denied 09/23/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Demario KEITH v. STATE
    CR-15-0851
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/24/2016
   Dismissed.


text:
    EX PARTE Beverly Jo JONES
    CR-15-0854
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/24/2016
   Mand. pet. dismissed.


text:
    Joseph P. DEMARCO v. STATE
    CR-15-0857
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Omahr GREGORY v. STATE
    CR-15-0860
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Shawn Lee RUSSUM v. STATE
    CR-15-0862
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    09/16/2016
   Dismissed.


text:
    EX PARTE Ulanda Tyrone MOON
    CR-15-0875
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    09/26/2016
   Petition for writ of prohibition dismissed.


text:
    Bryan Lee DANIEL v. STATE
    CR-15-0877
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
    Reh. denied 09/02/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    EX PARTE Frederick MURRAY, Jr.
    CR-15-0879
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    09/26/2016
   Habeas corpus pet. dismissed.


text:
    EX PARTE Rapheal SIMMONS
    CR-15-0882
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/31/2016
   Mand. pet. dismissed,


text:
    EX PARTE Dale Reginald SMITH
    CR-15-0893
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/06/2016
   Mand. pet. dismissed.


text:
    Xavier Labrail POKE v. STATE
    CR-15-0896
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/24/2016
   Dismissed.


text:
    Michael Wayne PRINCE v. STATE
    CR-15-0897
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    09/02/2016
    Reh. denied 09/16/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Kenneth James JACKSON v. STATE
    CR-15-0898
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
    Reh. denied 08/26/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Bobby Lee BANKS v. STATE
    CR-15-0899
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/06/2016
   Dismissed.


text:
    Darrius CHESTNUT v. STATE
    CR-15-0900
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    09/02/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    EX PARTE Harlan PRITCHETT
    CR-15-0903
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/06/2016
   Mand. pet. dismissed.


text:
    Kendramei JONES v. STATE
    CR-15-0904
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    09/02/2016
    Reh. denied 09/23/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    S.R.A. v. STATE
    CR-15-0910
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    EX PARTE Tommy Lee PATE
    CR-15-0911
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/06/2016
   Mand. pet. denied.


text:
    Harold Leroy BRAGG v. STATE
    CR-15-0912
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/29/2016
   Dismissed.


text:
    Timothy Lamar WILLIAMS v. STATE
    CR-15-0914
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/24/2016
   Dismissed.


text:
    Allen Alto MADDOX v. STATE
    CR-15-0915
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/26/2016
    Reh. denied 09/16/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Larry MCCALL v. STATE
    CR-15-0919
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
    Reh. denied 09/02/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Charles SULLIVAN v. STATE
    CR-15-0926
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/06/2016
   Dismissed.


text:
    Tommy Lee PATE v. STATE
    CR-15-0927
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/11/2016
   Reversed and remanded.


text:
    Robert Lewis HAWKINS v. STATE
    CR-15-0928
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/29/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    EX PARTE Roosevelt PAIGE, Jr.
    CR-15-0933
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/06/2016
   Mand. pet. dismissed.


text:
    Courtney Lamar MORRIS v. STATE
    CR-15-0935
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    09/02/2016
    Reh. denied 09/30/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    EX PARTE Charles Edward NELSON
    CR-15-0938
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/06/2016
   Mand. pet. dismissed.


text:
    EX PARTE Marlon Karl TAITE
    CR-15-0940
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/06/2016
   Mand. pet. denied.


text:
    Angela Yvonne ALLEN v. STATE
    CR-15-0942
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    09/02/2016
    Reh. denied 09/23/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Milas Jason SMITH v. STATE
    CR-15-0945
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    09/02/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    Bryde SLEDGE v. STATE
    CR-15-0948
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/05/2016
    Reh. denied 08/26/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    EX PARTE Tommy Tyrell JORDAN
    CR-15-0950
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/24/2016
   Mand. pet. granted in part.


text:
    William Clyde BRADFORD v. STATE
    CR-15-0953
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/23/2016
   Dismissed.


text:
    Reginald Lenoir HOLT v. STATE
    CR-15-0954
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    09/02/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    EX PARTE William C. COLEMAN
    CR-15-0964
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/24/2016
   Mand. pet. granted in part.


text:
    Patrick Deon JOHNSON v. STATE
    CR-15-0965
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/23/2016
   Dismissed.


text:
    EX PARTE Danny L. SMITH
    CR-15-0968
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/06/2016
   Mand, pet. denied.


text:
    EX PARTE James Calvin FRAZIER
    CR-15-0970
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    07/06/2016
   Mand. pqt. dismissed.


text:
    Cornelius Terrell BROWN v. STATE
    CR-15-0972
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/24/2016
   Dismissed.


text:
    Terry Lamar JONES v. STATE
    CR-15-0981
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    09/02/2016
   Affirmed.


text:
    EX PARTE James Arthur CULBRETH
    CR-15-0982
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/23/2016
   Mand. pet. denied.


text:
    EX PARTE Geramie Raquell HART
    CR-15-0986
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/23/2016
   Mand. pet. denied.


text:
    EX PARTE Jason Jermaine HALL
    CR-15-0987
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/23/2016
   Mand. pet. dismissed.


text:
    EX PARTE Harlan PRITCHETT
    CR-15-0988
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/23/2016
   Mand. pet, dismissed.


text:
    EX PARTE Gary Wayne PRESLEY
    CR-15-0990
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    08/23/2016
   Mand. pet. dismissed.