source: Caselaw Access Project

author: PER CURIAM.

license: Public Domain

text:
    Eric Scott BRANCH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Eric Scott Branch, Petitioner, v. Julie L. Jones, etc., Respondent.
    No. SC18-190 No. SC18-218
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    [February 15, 2018]
    Robert S. Friedman, Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Stacy Biggart and Kathleen Pafford, Assistant Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Northern Region, Tallahassee, Florida; Billy H. Nolas, Chief, and Kimberly Sharkey, Attorney, Capital Habeas Unit, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Northern District of Florida, Tallahassee, Florida, for Appellant/Petitioner
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Charmaine M. Millsaps, Senior Assistant Attorney General, and Lisa A. Hopkins, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, for Appellee/Respondent
   PER CURIAM.

Eric Scott Branch, a prisoner under sentence of death with an active death warrant, appeals a circuit court order summarily denying his second successive motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851 and petitions this Court for a writ of habeas corpus. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), (9), Fla. Const. For the following reasons, we affirm the circuit court's denial of the motion and deny the habeas petition.

FACTS AND RELEVANT PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Branch was convicted of first-degree murder, sexual battery, and grand theft in connection with the killing of Susan Morris. Branch v. State (Branch I ), 685 So.2d 1250 (Fla. 1996), cert. denied , 520 U.S. 1218, 117 S.Ct. 1709, 137 L.Ed.2d 833 (1997). We described the facts of the murder on direct appeal as follows:

Eric Branch was wanted by police in Indiana and because the car he was driving, a Pontiac, could be traced to him, he decided to steal a car from the campus of the University of West Florida [ (UWF) ] in Pensacola. When Susan Morris, a young college student, approached her car after attending an evening class [on] January 11, 1993, Branch accosted her and stole her red Toyota. Morris's nude body was found later in nearby woods; she had been beaten, stomped, sexually assaulted and strangled. She bore numerous bruises and lacerations, both eyes were swollen shut, and a wooden stick was broken off in her vagina.

Id. at 1251-52. The jury recommended a sentence of death by a vote of ten to two, and the trial court followed that recommendation. Id. at 1252. The trial court found the existence of three aggravating factors and four mitigating circumstances. Id. at 1252. On direct appeal, we affirmed Branch's convictions and sentences. Id. at 1253. In 2006, we affirmed the circuit court's denial of Branch's initial motion for postconviction relief and denied his initial petition for writ of habeas corpus. Branch v. State (Branch II ), 952 So.2d 470, 473 (Fla. 2006).

Branch subsequently filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida. Branch v. McDonough (Branch III ), 779 F.Supp.2d 1309 (N.D. Fla. 2010). The federal district court denied the petition, but issued a limited certificate of appealability. Id. at 1330. The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the judgment denying federal habeas corpus relief. Branch v. Sec'y, Fla. Dep't of Corr. (Branch IV ), 638 F.3d 1353, 1356 (11th Cir. 2011).

In 2016, we affirmed the circuit court's denial of Branch's motion for postconviction DNA testing filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.853 and section 925.11, Florida Statutes (2015). Branch v. State (Branch V ), No. SC15-1869, 2016 WL 4182823 (Fla. Aug. 8, 2016). On January 22, 2018, we affirmed the circuit court's denial of Branch's first successive motion for postconviction relief. Branch v. State (Branch VI ), No. SC17-1509, 234 So.3d 548, 2018 WL 495024 (Fla. Jan. 22, 2018).

On January 19, 2018, Governor Rick Scott signed a death warrant for Branch and scheduled his execution for February 22, 2018. On January 29, 2018, Branch filed his second successive motion for postconviction relief, raising two claims. First, Branch contended that because he was twenty-one years old at the time of the murder, executing him would violate the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution based upon Roper v. Simmons , 543 U.S. 551, 125 S.Ct. 1183, 161 L.Ed.2d 1 (2005). In Roper , the United States Supreme Court held that executing individuals who were under the age of eighteen at the time of their crimes is prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. Id. at 578-79, 125 S.Ct. 1183. Branch asserted (1) there is an emerging consensus in the medical community that the brain continues to develop through the mid-twenties, such that young adults are cognitively comparable to juveniles, and this consensus constitutes newly discovered evidence; (2) a national consensus has developed that individuals who were in their late teens and early twenties at the time of their crimes should not be executed; and (3) the criminal laws of other states and international law generally reflect that offenders who were in their late teens and early twenties at the time of their crimes are treated differently than older offenders. Branch additionally contended that the physical, emotional, and sexual trauma he suffered during his childhood and young adulthood, coupled with substance abuse, further impaired and delayed his brain development. Branch's second claim was that the length of time he has spent on death row constitutes cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment.

On February 1, 2018, the circuit court denied Branch's motion without an evidentiary hearing and denied Branch's application for stay of execution. This appeal follows. Branch also filed with this Court a motion for stay of execution and a successive petition for writ of habeas corpus, challenging the prior violent felony aggravating factor found by the trial court.

ANALYSIS

Public Records Requests

Branch first challenges the circuit court's denial of his requests for public records pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.852. We have explained:

[The] denial of public records requests are reviewed under the abuse of discretion standard. See Dennis v. State , 109 So.3d 680, 698 (Fla. 2012) ; Diaz v. State , 945 So.2d 1136, 1149 (Fla. 2006). "Discretion is abused only when the judicial action is arbitrary, fanciful, or unreasonable, which is another way of saying that discretion is abused only where no reasonable person would take the view adopted by the trial court." State v. Coney , 845 So.2d 120, 137 (Fla. 2003) (quoting White v. State , 817 So.2d 799, 806 (2002) ). The Court has long acknowledged that the public records procedure under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.852"is not intended to be a procedure authorizing a fishing expedition for records unrelated to a colorable claim for postconviction relief." Valle [v. State , 70 So.3d 530, 549 (Fla. 2011) ] (quoting Moore v. State , 820 So.2d 199, 204 (Fla. 2002) (quoting Glock v. Moore , 776 So.2d 243, 253 (Fla. 2001) ) ).

Muhammad v. State , 132 So.3d 176, 200 (Fla. 2013). A defendant "bears the burden of demonstrating that the records sought relate to a colorable claim for postconviction relief." Chavez v. State , 132 So.3d 826, 829 (Fla. 2014) (citing Mann v. State , 112 So.3d 1158, 1163 (Fla. 2013) ).

Branch initially sought extensive records from multiple entities, but later narrowed the requests to records relating to the expiration dates of the drugs the Florida Department of Corrections (DOC) plans to use during his execution and records relating to the autopsy of Patrick Charles Hannon, the last inmate to be executed under Florida's current lethal injection protocol. We have previously held that these types of requests are unlikely to lead to a colorable claim for postconviction relief. See, e.g. , Hannon v. State , 228 So.3d 505, 511 (Fla. 2017) ; Chavez , 132 So.3d at 830 ; Muhammad , 132 So.3d at 203, 206. Specifically, with respect to Branch's assertion that the DOC's supply of execution drugs may be expired, this Court has stated that it will presume "the DOC will act in accordance with its protocol and carry out its duties properly. This same presumption would extend to presume that the DOC will obtain viable versions of the drugs it intends to use and confirm before use that the drugs are still viable, as the protocol requires ." Muhammad , 132 So.3d at 206 (emphasis added) (citation omitted). Similarly, we have explained that autopsy records are not likely to lead to a colorable claim because they "would not establish when the inmates became unconscious or whether they experienced pain during their executions." Chavez , 132 So.3d at 830. Therefore, the circuit court did not abuse its discretion when it denied these requests, and we reject this claim.

Eligibility for the Death Penalty

Branch next contends that the circuit court erred when it summarily denied his claim that he is ineligible for the death penalty. However, the Supreme Court in Roper designated eighteen as the critical age for determining death eligibility, stating:

Drawing the line at 18 years of age is subject, of course, to the objections always raised against categorical rules. The qualities that distinguish juveniles from adults do not disappear when an individual turns 18. By the same token, some under 18 have already attained a level of maturity some adults will never reach.... [H]owever, a line must be drawn.... The age of 18 is the point where society draws the line for many purposes between childhood and adulthood. It is, we conclude, the age at which the line for death eligibility ought to rest.

543 U.S. at 574, 125 S.Ct. 1183 (emphasis added). Branch argues for an expansion of Roper on the basis that newly discovered evidence-in the form of scientific research with respect to development of the human brain, as well as the evolution of state and international law-mandates that individuals who committed murder in their late teens and early twenties be treated like juveniles. The circuit court properly denied this claim without an evidentiary hearing.

First, this issue is procedurally barred. The trial court's order sentencing Branch to death found that Branch's age was not a mitigating circumstance:

The defendant was twenty-one years of age at the time of this offense. There was testimony from the defendant's brother and grandfather that he was not particularly mature for his age, and that he frequently requested the assistance of relatives, primarily his grandfather, in making important decisions. The defendant did not, however, appear to be mentally deficient in any way. He assisted his counsel throughout trial, and testified at trial with great specificity and detail. The defendant's age at the time of the crime is not a mitigating factor.

On direct appeal, Branch did not challenge the trial court's rejection of age as a mitigating circumstance. Furthermore, the Supreme Court decided Roper on March 1, 2005. Branch filed the habeas petition in Branch II on August 31, 2005, and he did not assert that he was ineligible for execution pursuant to Roper . Accordingly, this claim is waived as it could have been raised previously.

Second, we have rejected similar claims on the basis that scientific research with respect to brain development does not qualify as newly discovered evidence. For example, in Morton v. State , 995 So.2d 233, 245 (Fla. 2008), the defendant claimed that a 2004 brain mapping study established that sections of the human brain are not fully developed until the age of twenty-five. He argued this constituted newly discovered evidence which required a reweighing of his age-nineteen-and-a-half years old at the time of the murder-as a mitigating circumstance. Id. In rejecting this claim, we stated:

We have previously rejected recognizing "new research studies" as newly discovered evidence if based on previously available data. See Schwab [v. State , 969 So.2d 318, 325 (Fla. 2007) ] (citing Diaz v. State , 945 So.2d 1136, 1144 (Fla. 2006) (concluding doctor's letter addressing lethal injection research was not newly discovered evidence because conclusions in letter were based on old data) ). Although this 2004 brain mapping study had not yet been published at the time of Morton's trials, Morton or his counsel could have discovered similar research at that time that stated that the human brain was not fully developed until early adulthood. See Jay D. Aronson, Brain Imaging, Culpability and the Juvenile Death Penalty , 13 Psychol. Pub. Pol'y & L. 115, 120 (2007) ("In the past few decades ... neuroscientists have discovered that two key developmental processes, myelination ... and pruning of neural connections, continue to take place during adolescence and well into adulthood .... [B]rain regions responsible for basic life processes and sensory perception tend to mature fastest, whereas the regions responsible for behavioral inhibition and control, risk assessment, decision making, and emotion maturing take longer (Yakovlev & Lecours, 1967)."). Therefore, the 2004 study would not constitute newly discovered evidence and the trial court correctly denied this claim without an evidentiary hearing.

Id. at 245-46 (some alterations in original). We further rejected on the merits Morton's claim that he was entitled to relief pursuant to Roper :

Roper has no application here where the facts are undisputed that Morton's chronological age was above nineteen at the time he committed the crimes. Because it is impossible for Morton to demonstrate that he falls within the ages of exemption, his claim is facially insufficient and it was proper for the court to deny Morton a hearing on this claim.

Id. at 245.

Similarly, in Davis v. State , 142 So.3d 867 (Fla. 2014), the defendant-who was under an active death warrant-contended that he was not eligible for the death penalty because, despite his chronological age of twenty-five at the time of the murder, he was the "functional equivalent of a child." Id. at 870. The defendant relied upon "allegedly newly discovered evidence regarding the effects of alcoholism and sexual abuse on brain development in children, and ... Roper ." Id. at 874. This Court concluded that the evidence presented by the defendant was not newly discovered and, even if it was, the claim would still fail on the merits:

The studies cited by Davis, addressing the effects of alcoholism and sexual abuse on brain development, do not constitute newly discovered evidence. This Court has previously stated that it "has not recognized 'new opinions' or 'new research studies' as newly discovered evidence." Schwab v. State , 969 So.2d 318, 325 (Fla. 2007). The articles that Davis relies upon fall squarely within this subject area and therefore do not constitute newly discovered evidence. See Farina v. State , 992 So.2d 819 (Fla. 2008) (table decision) (holding that a "study on brain mapping is not newly discovered evidence"); Schwab , 969 So.2d at 325 (concluding that "two recent scientific articles regarding brain anatomy and sexual offense" did not constitute newly discovered evidence).
Further, as explained above, even if these recently published articles were considered newly discovered evidence, Davis still fails to put forth a cognizable claim. The United States Supreme Court's decision in Roper prohibits the execution of those individuals "who were under the age of 18 when their crimes were committed." 543 U.S. at 578, 125 S.Ct. 1183. In interpreting the Supreme Court's decision, this Court has previously stated that " Roper only prohibits the execution of those defendants whose chronological age is below eighteen." Hill [v. State , 921 So.2d 579, 584 (Fla. 2006) ]. Therefore, because Davis was over the age of eighteen when he committed murder, Roper does not apply, and his claim is without merit.

Id. at 875-76.

Finally, the United States Supreme Court has continued to identify eighteen as the critical age for purposes of Eighth Amendment jurisprudence. See Miller v. Alabama , 567 U.S. 460, 465, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012) (prohibiting mandatory sentences of life without parole for homicide offenders who committed their crimes before the age of eighteen); Graham v. Florida , 560 U.S. 48, 74-75, 130 S.Ct. 2011, 176 L.Ed.2d 825 (2010) (prohibiting sentences of life without parole for nonhomicide offenders who committed their crimes before the age of eighteen). Therefore, unless the United States Supreme Court determines that the age of ineligibility for the death penalty should be extended, we will continue to adhere to Roper .

Accordingly, Branch is eligible for execution because he was not under the age of eighteen at the time he murdered Morris, and the circuit court properly denied this claim without an evidentiary hearing.

Length of Time on Death Row

Next, Branch contends that the length of time he has spent on death row-almost twenty-four years-amounts to cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment. We rejected a similar claim in Correll v. State , 184 So.3d 478 (Fla. 2015), where the inmate had been on death row for over twenty-nine years:

[T]his Court has repeatedly rejected such challenges. See, e.g. , Pardo v. State , 108 So.3d 558, 569 (Fla. 2012) (twenty-four years); Johnston v. State , 27 So.3d 11, 27 (Fla. 2010) (almost twenty-five years); Tompkins v. State , 994 So.2d 1072, 1085 (Fla. 2008) (twenty-three years); Booker v. State , 969 So.2d 186, 200 (Fla. 2007) (almost thirty years). Further, executions of inmates who have been on death row as long as, or longer than, Correll have been permitted. See, e.g. , Ferguson v. State , 101 So.3d 362, 366 (Fla. 2012) (more than thirty years); Waterhouse v. State , 82 So.3d 84, 87 (Fla. 2012) (more than thirty-one years); Valle v. State , 70 So.3d 530, 552 (Fla. 2011) (thirty-three years).

Id. at 486. We decline to recede from our longstanding precedent, and we affirm the denial of this claim.

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

Branch has repeatedly challenged the validity of the prior violent felony aggravating factor, which was based upon his Indiana conviction for the crime of sexual battery. In his habeas petition, Branch again challenges this aggravating factor. In brief, he argues that his Indiana conviction for sexual battery was not a violent felony under Florida law, the trial court should not have instructed the jury that sexual battery is a crime of violence, and the trial court improperly relied on the Indiana conviction to establish the prior violent felony aggravating factor. These claims should have been or were raised on direct appeal and are, therefore, procedurally barred. See Breedlove v. Singletary , 595 So.2d 8, 10 (Fla. 1992) ("Habeas corpus is not a second appeal and cannot be used to litigate or relitigate issues which could have been, should have been, or were raised on direct appeal."); see also id. ("Using different grounds to reargue the same issue is also improper.").

Moreover, we concluded in Branch II that even if the Indiana conviction did not qualify as a prior violent felony, any error was harmless:

Here, the trial court found two other significant aggravators: the murder was committed in the course of a sexual battery and was especially heinous, atrocious, or cruel. The trial court determined that the mitigating evidence was marginal. Moreover, contrary to Branch's assertions, the mitigating evidence presented at the evidentiary hearing adds little more to what was previously presented.

952 So.2d at 482. We have previously stated that the heinous, atrocious, or cruel aggravating factor is "qualitatively among the weightiest aggravating circumstances." Kaczmar v. State , 228 So.3d 1, 15 (Fla. 2017). With respect to this aggravating factor, the trial court found:

The victim in this case was attacked in a parking lot at [UWF] following an evening class. She was carried or dragged from the parking lot to a remote wooded area. Her clothes were removed and she was both beaten and strangled, in addition to being sexually battered. She sustained multiple bruises and abrasions of the face and head. There were also abrasions and contusions corresponding to the sock which was tied around her neck. Injuries to the internal portions of her neck include fractures of the larynx and hyoid bone. The medical examiner stated that these internal injuries were commonly seen either from a manual compression of the neck or from an injury in which the assailant stamps on the victim's neck with his foot while the victim, in a supine position, has her head and face against a firm surface such as the earth. The medical examiner testified that the victim had injuries to her forearms and hands which were characterized as defensive in nature. He testified that such injuries are commonly seen in victims who are receiving a beating, and who attempt to ward off the blows by raising their hands and arms up to the face. The medical examiner testified he could not be certain whether death was caused by the multiple blows to the head or by strangulation.... The medical examiner testified that out of more than three thousand autopsies which he has performed, this one will stand out in his mind as a result of the brutality of the injuries.
....
... [I]t is clear that the injuries inflicted on the victim which led to her death were committed with the intent to inflict extreme pain.

Because Branch's habeas claims are both procedurally barred and without merit, he is not entitled to relief.

CONCLUSION

Based on the foregoing, we affirm the circuit court's denial of Branch's second successive postconviction motion and deny his successive petition for writ of habeas corpus. Because Branch is not entitled to relief, we deny his motion for stay of execution. No oral argument is necessary, and no rehearing will be entertained by this Court. The mandate shall issue immediately.

It is so ordered.

LABARGA, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

      The murder was committed during a sexual battery; Branch had been convicted of a prior violent felony in the State of Indiana; and the murder was especially heinous, atrocious, or cruel. Branch I , 685 So.2d at 1252 n.1.

      Branch had an unstable childhood; Branch possessed positive personality traits; Branch behaved acceptably during trial; and Branch was remorseful. Id. at n.2.

      Branch turned twenty-two less than one month after the murder.

      The current DOC lethal injection protocol provides that "[a] designated execution team member will purchase, and at all times ensure a sufficient supply of, the chemicals to be used in the lethal injection process. The designated team member will ensure that the lethal chemicals have not reached or surpassed their expiration dates. " Fla. Dep't of Corr., Execution by Lethal Injection Procedures 4 (2017), http://www.dc.state.fl.us/oth/deathrow/lethal-injection-procedures-asof_01-04-17.pdf (emphasis added).

      Branch further relies upon American Bar Association Resolution 111 which "urges each jurisdiction that imposes capital punishment to prohibit the imposition of a death sentence on or execution of any individual who was 21 years old or younger at the time of the offense." ABA House of Delegates Resolution 111 (adopted Feb. 5, 2018), https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/images/abanews/mym2018res/111.pdf. The resolution is based on the same considerations as those presented by Branch in these proceedings. See, e.g. , A.B.A. Death Penalty Due Process Rev. Project & Sec. Civ. Rts. & Soc. Just., Report to the House of Delegates 3 (2018) ( "The newly-understood similarities between juvenile and late adolescent brains, as well as the evolution of death penalty law and relevant standards under the Eighth Amendment lead to the clear conclusion that individuals in late adolescence should be exempted from capital punishment.").


text:
    Quawn M. FRANKLIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. SC17-824
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    [February 15, 2018]
    James Vincent Viggiano, Jr., Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Maria Christine Perinetti, Raheela Ahmed, Reuben Andrew Neff, and Lisa Marie Bort, Assistant Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Middle Region, Temple Terrace, Florida, for Appellant
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, and Stephen D. Ake, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, Florida, for Appellee
   PER CURIAM.

Quawn M. Franklin appeals an order of the circuit court summarily denying a motion to vacate his sentence of death under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the postconviction court's summary denial of Franklin's postconviction motion.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Franklin was convicted of attempted robbery and first-degree murder in the shooting death of Jerry Lawley. Franklin v. State (Franklin I ), 965 So.2d 79, 84-86 (Fla. 2007). After the penalty phase, the jury unanimously recommended death. Id. at 87. At Franklin's request, the jury returned a special interrogatory verdict form indicating that it unanimously found each of the four proposed aggravators. Id. at 102. The trial court followed the jury's recommendation and imposed a death sentence. In doing so, the trial court found the same four aggravating factors and concluded that the aggravators outweighed the mitigating factors. Id. at 88. This Court affirmed Franklin's conviction and death sentence on direct appeal. Id. at 102.

On November 7, 2008, Franklin filed his first rule 3.851 motion in the circuit court and moved for a competency determination. Franklin v. State (Franklin II ), 137 So.3d 969, 977 (Fla. 2014). On June 3, 2010, the trial court found Franklin competent to proceed. Id. Franklin then amended his postconviction motion, raising eleven claims. Id. The postconviction court summarily denied claims three through eight, as well as claim ten. Id. at 977-78. Following an evidentiary hearing, the postconviction court denied claims one, two, nine, and eleven. Id. at 978. Franklin sought relief in this Court, raising three claims, and filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus that raised two claims. This Court affirmed the postconviction court's order. Id. at 987.

Franklin filed a successive postconviction motion on January 9, 2017, raising two claims: (1) his death sentence is unconstitutional under Hurst v. Florida , --- U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016), and (2) his death sentence stands in violation of the Eighth Amendment under Hurst v. Florida . The postconviction court denied the motion, finding that "the Hurst error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt as the jury returned an interrogatory verdict unanimously agreeing that each of the four aggravating factors were present and unanimously recommending that death was the appropriate sentence given the substantial aggravation and slight mitigation presented." Franklin appealed the postconviction court's order on April 28, 2017. On June 20, 2017, this Court issued an order directing the parties to file briefs addressing why the ruling should not be affirmed in light of this Court's precedent in Hurst .

ANALYSIS

Franklin argues that his death sentence violates the Sixth Amendment under Hurst v. Florida , --- U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016). In Hurst v. State , 202 So.3d 40, 57 (Fla. 2016), we explained that Hurst v. Florida requires "the jury in a capital case [to] unanimously and expressly find all the aggravating factors that were proven beyond a reasonable doubt, unanimously find that the aggravating factors are sufficient to impose death, unanimously find that the aggravating factors outweigh the mitigating circumstances, and unanimously recommend a sentence of death." We also determined that Hurst error is capable of harmless error review. Id. at 67. Therefore, the issue in this case is whether any Hurst error during Franklin's penalty phase proceedings was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. Id. at 68.

Franklin's penalty phase jury found the existence of each aggravator unanimously and made a unanimous recommendation of death using an interrogatory verdict form. Such a recommendation "allow[s] us to conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that a rational jury would have unanimously found that there were sufficient aggravators to outweigh the mitigating factors." Davis v. State , 207 So.3d 142, 174 (Fla. 2016). Although the jury was not properly instructed under Hurst , and despite the mitigation presented, the jury still unanimously recommended that Franklin be sentenced to death for the murder of Lawley. Therefore, any Hurst error in Franklin's penalty phase was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt and the postconviction court properly denied relief on this claim.

Franklin also contends that a unanimous jury recommendation violates the Eighth Amendment pursuant to Caldwell v. Mississippi , 472 U.S. 320, 105 S.Ct. 2633, 86 L.Ed.2d 231 (1985), when a jury is repeatedly told that its role is advisory. Franklin further claims that his death sentence violates the Eighth Amendment under Hurst because the standard jury instructions improperly diminished the jury's role. Franklin's Caldwell claim is procedurally barred because he did not raise it on direct appeal. See Jones v. State , 928 So.2d 1178, 1182 n.5 (Fla. 2006). To the extent that Franklin's claim about the standard jury instructions is a Hurst claim, he is not entitled to relief because of the jury's unanimous recommendation of death and unanimous finding of all four aggravating factors. See Davis , 207 So.3d at 174.

Procedural bar notwithstanding, prior to Hurst , we repeatedly rejected Caldwell challenges to the standard jury instructions used during Franklin's trial. See Rigterink v. State , 66 So.3d 866, 897 (Fla. 2011) ; Globe v. State , 877 So.2d 663, 673-74 (Fla. 2004). We have also rejected Caldwell -related Hurst claims like Franklin's pursuant to Davis . See Oliver v. State , 214 So.3d 606 (Fla. 2017) ;

Truehill v. State , 211 So.3d 930 (Fla 2017). Recently, the defendants in Oliver and Truehill petitioned the United States Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari to review their Caldwell claims, which the Court denied. Truehill v. Florida , ---U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 3, 199 L.Ed.2d 272 (2017). Franklin, whose sentence was final post- Ring and who received a unanimous jury recommendation, is not entitled to Hurst relief. See Davis , 207 So.3d at 174. Accordingly, Franklin is not entitled to relief on this claim.

Based on the foregoing, we affirm the decision of the postconviction court and deny relief on Franklin's claims.

It is so ordered.

LABARGA, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

CANADY and POLSTON, JJ., concur in result.

      The jury found the following four aggravators:
      (1) the murder was committed while Franklin was serving a prison sentence because he was on conditional release at the time of Lawley's shooting; (2) Franklin had previous violent felony convictions, including another capital felony for the murder of Horan; (3) Lawley's murder was committed for pecuniary gain; and (4) the murder was cold, calculated, and premediated (CCP).
      Id. at 87-88.

      The trial court found the following ten nonstatutory mitigators:
      (1) there were deficiencies in Franklin's upbringing which included being forcibly removed by his biological mother from the only mother and father he had known for eight years (given some weight); (2) Franklin had been sentenced to adult prison at a young age and served eight years of a ten-year sentence, which was a severe sentence in light of his prior record (given little weight); (3) Franklin had cooperated with law enforcement after his arrest (given some weight); (4) Franklin took responsibility for his crimes by confessing to the police and a newspaper reporter (given some weight); (5) Franklin had offered to plead guilty in return for a life sentence without possibility of parole that would run consecutive to his other life sentences (given little weight); (6) Franklin apologized to the victim's family, showed remorse, and confessed to other offenses which were used as aggravating circumstances (given some weight); (7) Franklin apologized and showed remorse for his other crimes (given little weight); (8) Franklin had entered pleas in his related cases and had been sentenced to life (given some weight); (9) there was no one available to testify on Franklin's behalf in the penalty phase (given some weight); and (10) codefendant McCoy received a thirty-five-year sentence for her role in the crimes (given little weight).
      Id. at 88 n.4.

      Franklin raised the following claims on direct appeal:
      (1) the admission of hearsay statements relating to his prior violent felony convictions during the penalty phase violated his constitutional right to confront witnesses in light of the United States Supreme Court's recent decision in Crawford v. Washington , 541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004) ; (2) the trial court erred in admitting the objected-to portions of Franklin's taped interview with the newspaper reporter; (3) the guilt phase admission of hearsay statements made by the victim also constituted a Crawford violation; (4) the trial court erred by refusing to accept Franklin's stipulation to his prior violent felony convictions in lieu of testimony regarding the crimes; (5) improper victim impact evidence was presented to the jury; (6) the CCP aggravating factor was not properly found; (7) the pecuniary gain aggravating factor was not properly found; and (8) Florida's capital sentencing statute is facially unconstitutional under Ring [v. Arizona , 536 U.S. 584, 122 S.Ct. 2428, 153 L.Ed.2d 556 (2002),] because the judge rather than the jury determines the sentence to be imposed.
      Id. at 88.

      Franklin raised the following eleven claims before the postconviction court:
      (1) ineffective assistance of penalty phase trial counsel; (2) ineffective assistance of penalty phase trial counsel by failing to call Dr. Douglas Mason; (3) ineffective assistance of trial counsel during voir dire; (4) ineffective assistance of trial counsel by failing to file a motion for a change of venue; (5) ineffective assistance of trial counsel in failing to inform the jury of Franklin's ineligibility for parole; (6) Florida's method of execution by lethal injection violates both the Florida and United States Constitutions; (7) Franklin is prohibited from knowing the identity of the execution team members in violation of his rights under the Florida and United States Constitutions; (8) ineffective assistance of trial counsel pertaining to Franklin's competency; (9) ineffective assistance of trial counsel by failing to investigate and present an insanity defense; (10) Franklin's right against cruel and unusual punishment will be violated because he may be incompetent at the time of execution; and (11) cumulative error deprived Franklin of a fundamentally fair trial.
      Id. at 978 n.5.

      On appeal, Franklin raised the following five claims:
      (1) the postconviction court erred in finding him competent to proceed in his postconviction proceedings; (2) the postconviction court erred in denying his claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel during the penalty phase; (3) the postconviction court erred in summarily denying his claim that trial counsel were ineffective during voir dire and for failing to file a motion for a change of venue; (4) Florida's method of execution for lethal injection is cruel and unusual punishment and would deprive him of his due process and equal protection rights under the United States Constitution (habeas claim); and (5) his right against cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution will be violated because he may be incompetent at the time of execution (habeas claim).
      Id. at 978.


text:
    Ray SCHREINER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-1174
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 2, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Georgette LUNDQUIST, Appellant, v. LEE COUNTY and RH Venture II, LLC; RH Venture III; and Greenpointe Communities, LLC, Appellees.
    CASE NO. 1D17-22
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 2, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    David I. WILSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-4095
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 2, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Aaron WRIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-3300
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 2, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    J.O., Father of A.O., a Minor Child, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Respondent.
    CASE NO. 1D17-2824
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 2, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   DENIED.


text:
    Ronald MERRITT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-2398
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 2, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Steven MONTGOMERY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-5830
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 2, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Davee' Lee MALONE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-5701
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 2, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    V. T. L., Father of T. L. and S. L., Minor Children, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-3225
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 6, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Michael James MCPHERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-5414
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 2, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Marci HAMILTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-3598
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 2, 2017 Rehearing Denied January 4, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Matthew Phillip ALEXANDER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D15-5186
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 2, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Xavier Devon'Tae WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-3182
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 6, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Jason BISHOP, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-3060
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 6, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Gary RICHARDS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-2745
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 6, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Willie J. HUDSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-2561
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 6, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Henry APFELBACH, Appellant, v. SOUTH WALTON FIRE DISTRICT/PREFERRED GOVERNMENT CLAIMS SOLUTIONS/PGCS, Appellees.
    CASE NO. 1D17-2152
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 6, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Fred HARRIS Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-1662
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 6, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    PROGRESSIVE EMPLOYER MANAGEMENT COMPANY, INC./TERRIE LOBB CATERING, INC. and AmTrust North America of Florida, Appellants, v. Christine GRIFFIN, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-0687
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 6, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Brandon POTTER, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    CASE NO. 1D16-5548
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 6, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   DENIED.


text:
    Tony MIMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-2700
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 8, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Marcy SCARDINO, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-5351
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 6, 2017 Rehearing Denied December 12, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Katherine Anne SMITH, Appellant, v. Douglas W. SMITH and E. Drew Mitchell, individually, as Co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of Robert H. Smith, and as Co-Trustees of the Robert H. Smith Marital Trust, Appellees.
    CASE NO. 1D16-2621
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 6, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Katherine Anne SMITH, Appellant, v. Douglas W. SMITH and E. Drew Mitchell, as Co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of Robert H. Smith. In re: Estate of Robert H. Smith, Deceased, Appellees.
    CASE NO. 1D16-4723
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 6, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Terrance L. JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-2685
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 8, 2017 Rehearing Denied January 4, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Jeremy Brandon STINSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-4590
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 8, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Darryl KIRKSEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-3690
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 8, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Steve HERRING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-3355
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 8, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Joseph W. ATKINS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    CASE NO. 1D17-3146
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 8, 2017 Rehearing Denied January 10, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Deron WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-3025
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 8, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Michael Anthony PLANES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-2307
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 8, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Leah Giannotti MANNING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-0712
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 8, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Librada GONZALEZ, Petitioner, v. BEACH WALK RESORT, Respondent.
    CASE NO. 1D17-3881
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 8, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   DISMISSED.


text:
    James McAnthony BELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-3588
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 8, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Darryl CRAWFORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-2998
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 8, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Sean SPENCER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-2833
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 8, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    John E. FRANCES and Lealer Frances, Appellants, v. The BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, et al., Appellees.
    CASE NO. 1D17-1415
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 8, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Jason T. WITHERSPOON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    CASE NO. 1D17-3531
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 8, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Cedric Antonio BRYANT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-3428
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 8, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Jordan SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-3320
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 8, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Vince COLEMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-2904
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 8, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Jon J. UHLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-1125
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 8, 2017 Rehearing Denied December 29, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Taleasha Daniele MCTEAR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-4795
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 8, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Jay Morgan SOWERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-2918
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 8, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Scott MEIDE, Nell Meide, Mike Meide III, and Jeff Meide, Petitioners, v. Belinda MITCHELL, Carol Hamner, Ramona Wilson, and Crystal Pool Service, LLC, Respondents.
    CASE NO. 1D17-4419
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 9, 2017. Rehearing Denied December 8, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Edward HAMMOND, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-3728
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 8, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Terrance Kwan KEITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-2163
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 8, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Orlando PETERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-2140
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 8, 2017 Rehearing Denied December 29, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Justin Ashley CHAMPION, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    CASE NO. 1D17-4329
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 9, 2017 Rehearing Denied January 4, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    David MANSON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    CASE NO. 1D17-4232
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 9, 2017 Rehearing Denied January 9, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Teresita De Jesus ABREU, Petitioner, v. RIVERLAND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL and Broward School Board, Respondents.
    CASE NO. 1D17-3882
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 9, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   DISMISSED.


text:
    B. W., Mother of K. W.-S, Minor Child, Appellant, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-2451
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 9, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Michael TRAMEL, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    CASE NO. 1D17-2116
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 9, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Corry MENCY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-5717
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 9, 2017. Rehearing Denied December 21, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Amber Christelle ROBERTS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-5415
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 9, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Jeremy Namann NUGENT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-4915
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 9, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Jonah PARKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-1921
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 13, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Jonah PARKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-1920
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 13, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Janero James PRATT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-4685
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 9, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Betty Heasley PORTERFIELD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-1841
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 9, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    William WISE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-0729
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 13, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Robert EVANS, Appellant, v. LYKES PASCO, INC., and Sedgwick CMS Tampa, Appellees.
    CASE NO. 1D16-5329
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 13, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Robert Earl HAYES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-5219
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 13, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Juan Oscar DOMINGUEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-4943
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 13, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Anthony MAIORANO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-3542
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 13, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Terrill Lamar JENKINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-2344
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 13, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Khalid Hyat CHAUDHRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-0680
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 13, 2017 Rehearing Denied December 21, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Jonah PARKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-1923
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 13, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    James CLARK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-3388
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 14, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Jonah PARKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-1922
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 13, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Bryan FLOWERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-1572
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 13, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Garrett E. MILLER and Kathryn L. Miller, Appellants, v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON f/k/a The Bank of New York as Trustee FOR The CERTIFICATEHOLDERS OF CWMBS, INC., CHL MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH TRUST 2005-30, MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-30, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-98
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 13, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Jason M. FRANKLIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-2527
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 14, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Victoria Cooke HVITVED, Appellant, v. PENNYMAC CORP., Morten Hvitved, and American Express Bank, FSB., Appellees.
    CASE NO. 1D17-0608
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 14, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Rudolph ROCK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-3723
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 14, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Freddie SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-1972
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 14, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Jose FLORES, Appellant, v. GC CONSTRUCTION GROUP INC./GUARANTEE INSURANCE, Appellees.
    CASE NO. 1D17-1585
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 14, 2017 Rehearing Denied January 9, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Willie WATTS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-3627
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 14, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Alphonso JAMES, Sr., Appellant, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Department of Corrections, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-1221
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 14, 2017. Rehearing Denied January 17, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Calvin POWELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-3418
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 14, 2017 Rehearing Denied January 2, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Alonzo MOORE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-3059
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 14, 2017 Rehearing Denied January 17, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Garcia HALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-3019
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 14, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    A. W., Father of B. W., Minor Child, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-3006
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 14, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Ledarius Kardi SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-4925
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 14, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Michael COLEMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-2812
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 14, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Beau FREEMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-2653
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 14, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Angel Lynn BARROWS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-2636
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 14, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Bryan W. PLUMMER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-2531
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 14, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Detron Lamonte CUSHION, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-2165
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 14, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Christopher MARTONE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-3722
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 14, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Edgar B. FARMER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-3677
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 14, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    James Donte WARREN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-1348
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 14, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Horace ASH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-4217
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 21, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Justin Watson PARR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-3263
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 14, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Ah Lain Saing KAYLAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-2485
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 14, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Rolland ALLOTEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-3661
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 14, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Justin Rashad HOWARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-3287
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 4, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Shane LARMON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-907
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 2, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Gerald F. BULL, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-936
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 2, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Donniest KENNEDY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Grady C. JUDD, Sheriff, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-1044
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 28, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Granted.


text:
    Alvin D. HOWARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-978
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 2, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Robert R. MCDOWELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-860
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 2, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Angelo M. WHITE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-864
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 2, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Jimmy Dwight GREEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-868
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 2, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Robert RUDD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-873
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 2, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Jerome SWAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-903
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 2, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Corey Adam RAIA, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-1430
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 27, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Derek D. DURANT, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-2234
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 27, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    George MILLER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-2099
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 27, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Richard A. SENA, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-1229
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 13, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Devin J. WHITFIELD, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-1339
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    May 24, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Devin J. WHITFIELD Appellant/petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida Appellee/respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-1759
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    July 13, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Antonius R. WILLIAMS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-0836
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 27, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Devin J. WHITFIELD, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-1340
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    May 23, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Devin J. WHITFIELD, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-1341
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    May 09, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Frederick D. WILLIAMS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-1330
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 27, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Jimmy Lee WILLIAMS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-1690
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 27, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Antonius R. WILLIAMS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-0150
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 16, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Mark A. WILLIAMS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-1462
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 16, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Ulysses Lee WILLIAMS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-2017
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    July 14, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Robert T. WILSON, Sr., et al., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. FEDERAL NAT'L MTG CORP, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-1872
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 29, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Marvin WILLIAMS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-1570
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 16, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Terry L. WILLIAMS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-1404
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 13, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Neelam UPPAL, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. WELLS FARGO, N.A., Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D16-1240
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 28, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Antoine WINSLETTE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-1212
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 16, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Tajhon Boderick WILSON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Ken BURKE, Clerk, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-1615
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 12, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Kennedy WRIGHT, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-1033
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    May 18, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Clifton C. WILLIAMS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Micarline LAVENTURE, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D16-0452
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 13, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Christopher Daniel WINCHCOMBE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D16-5552
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 07, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Raymond Lavar WILLIAMS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D16-5309
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    May 19, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Michael Lee WOODS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D16-607
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    April 14, 2016
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Frank Paul HARGETT, Jr., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF REVENUE CHILD SUPPORT, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D16-2293
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 29, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Granted. Dismissed.


text:
    Bruce J. KAVITSKY, Appellant/petitioner(s), v. SUN QUEST HOMES, INC., et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D16-4856
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 28, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Jamie CRUZ, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE o/b/o Reagan Vinson, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D16-4009
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 22, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Britt H. JENSEN & Eden R. Jensen, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. THIRD FEDERAL SAVINGS LOAN ASSOCIATION OF CLEVELAND, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D16-4236
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 22, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Oswaldo MANTILLA, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-0101
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 29, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Granted. Dismissed.


text:
    Claude Edward HOLMES, Jr. and Holmes Funeral Directors, Inc., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Eric DONALDSON, Robert Donaldson and Shanice Donaldson, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D16-5604
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 22, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Granted. Dismissed.


text:
    BERT SMITH EURO COLLECTION, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION O/B/O Dyer O. KASAKOFF, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-0170
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 22, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Dino HYLTON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE O/B/O Leslie BURTS, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-0177
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 13, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Granted. Dismissed.


text:
    Christopher M. VIGNA, Jr., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. LAKEWOOD RANCH ANESTHESIA, LP, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-0202
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 22, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Luisa GUILLEN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-0785
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 22, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Nedal ALAZZAM, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOC., et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-0290
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 13, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Granted. Dismissed.


text:
    Audley O. KERR and Suzette T. Kerr, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. U. S. BANK NATIONAL ASSN., Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-0668
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 13, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Granted. Dismissed.


text:
    Hillary FENNER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. WILLIAMSBURG HOMEOWNERS ASSOC., INC., Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-0188
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    July 21, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Antonio BADILLO, Jr., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF REVENUE CHILD SUPPORT, O/B/O Carmen Antonia GUTIERREZ, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-0812
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 22, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Eloise JARVIS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. The BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-0971
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 22, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    4 ACES OF TAMPA, INC. and Carolyn Carrido, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. George GORDON, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-0646
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 09, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed. Denied.


text:
    Anthony J. GAINES, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-0214
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    July 20, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Cecil LEEDY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. John LEEDY, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-2542
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    July 20, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Patricia L. HODGSON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. David R. HODGSON, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-1965
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    July 20, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Antonio DRAGONAS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC., Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D16-0432
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    July 20, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    PMI MORTGAGE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Kevin C. MCCORMICK, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D16-2406
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    July 20, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    EAG AMERICAS, INC., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Juergen HEBERLEIN, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-2733
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    July 18, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Chris WIGLESWORTH, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DYCK-O'NEAL, INC., Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D16-3797
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    July 18, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Nicholas Joseph ANGELASTRO, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. SARASOTA COUNTY PUBLIC HOSPITAL BOARD, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-1867
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    July 13, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Scott Lynn CORUM, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D16-4582
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    July 13, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Karen J. WOLSTEIN, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D16-4038
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    July 13, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Rich BOBKA, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-1306
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    July 12, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Stephen E. MASTRO, a/k/a Steve Mastro, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-2623
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    July 11, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    GOOD SHEPHERD HOSPICE, INC., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Frank MAURA, Estate of: Francisco J. Maura, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-2728
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    July 11, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Granted. Dismissed.


text:
    Ryan L. FLANAGAN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D16-5428
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    July 10, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Calvin Leon JONES, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-0467
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    July 10, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    HOA PROBLEM SOLUTIONS 5, INC., as Trustee, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D16-4434
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    July 10, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    SUN 'N LAKE OF SEBRING IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Zenon AYALA, Lucy Ayala, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-2440
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    July 10, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Bedeau JEAN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-0424
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    July 10, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    William B. SEPE Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D16-3685
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    July 06, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Jesse ENRIQUEZ, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D16-3905
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    July 06, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Mohammad ABUEL-HAIJA, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Parisima TAEB, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-0577
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    July 06, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Barbara SALVIN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. LAKE ASHTON HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. and Bruce D. Kelley, III, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-0493
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    July 06, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Ida M. RANDOLPH, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. SOUTHEAST PROPERTY ACQUISITIONS, LLC, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D16-3679
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    July 05, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Jorge TELLEZ, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D16-4544
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    July 05, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Javaris BLUNT, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D16-3541
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    July 05, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Marcus B. HARRIS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. William F. CRENSHAW, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-2464
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 29, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Akeem Antonio JONES, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-2454
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 27, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Todd AIDMAN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Tamela MADONIA, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-2499
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 22, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Jason LE BLANC, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF REVENUE, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-1239
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 22, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Annette KIELHURN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Paul CASTAGLIOLA, Esq., Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-1308
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 22, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Carolyn W. CHURCHWELL, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-1526
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 16, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Rocco A. MIGLIAZZO, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-1352
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 15, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Granted. Dismissed.


text:
    Melodi MCLAIN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Elias Lou ABUSAID, Jr., Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-1736
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 29, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied. Denied as moot.


text:
    Jerome FISHER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. BEAZER HOMES CORP., Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-1892
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 28, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Carolina Marin HERNANDEZ, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-1894
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 22, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Anthony J. FAILS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Julie JONES, Secretary, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-1636
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    May 22, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Anthony Mark DANIEL, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, O/B/O Cerissa Devonne WIMBLEY, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-2053
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 28, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    A.D. ASPER INVESTMENTS, LLC, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. The BANYAN TREE CONDOMINIUM ASSOC. OF FORT MYERS, INC., Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-2126
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 23, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Daquarius BRADLEY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Keosha BACON, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-2042
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 22, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Guido RIVEROS, ESTATE OF: Luis A. RIVEROS, Appellant/petitioner(s), v. TRUSTEES OF MEASE HOSPITAL, INC., d/b/a Mease Countryside Hospital, Appellee/respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-2478
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 22, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Jane DOE, Appellant, v. Joel H. GOLDBERG, D.M.D., Joel H. Goldberg, D.M.D., P.A., Tara Baker, and Gayle Hammonds, Appellees.
    Case No. 2D15-2454
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 4, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    James HINES, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-4472
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 4, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Roberto VALLE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-1731
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    May 05, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Carlos DIAZ, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. David GEE, Sheriff, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-0314
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 15, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Osario Shamel-Dudley RYAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-2744
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 16, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Melissa CUNNINGHAM, Appellant, v. Anthony FELICE, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-3518
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 16, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    IN the INTEREST OF L.G. and I.G., children.
    A.G., Petitioner, v. Department of Children and Families and Guardian Ad Litem Program, Respondents.
    Case No. 2D17-1362
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 4, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. John Cathcart MCCARTNEY, Respondent.
    Case No. 2D15-4179
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    August 4, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Rashard Donte RIVERS, DOC #C00890, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-3834
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 16, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Isiah D. HARVEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-5125
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 16, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Torrey Dewayne WALKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-5182
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 16, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    D.S.A., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-5200
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 16, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Juan C. ESTRADA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D15-4928
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 18, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Doug LIBERTORE, Appellant, v. BOB GREEN SALES AND ASSOCIATES, INC., d/b/a Park Avenue Numismatics, a Florida Corporation; Robert T. Greenberg, Individually; and Carlos Cabrera, Individually, Appellees.
    Case No. 2D16-1487
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 18, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Jonathan SKAFF, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-200
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 18, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Harry Allen ATHA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-2593
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 18, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Craig Dwight DOLPHY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-1785
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 18, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Darryl E. MORGAN, DC# 577694, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-2219
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 18, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    EVERBANK, Appellant, v. Earl DUNKLEY; City of Tampa, Florida; Unknown Tenants in Possession #1 as to Unit A, Unknown Tenants in Possession #2 as to Unit A, Unknown Tenants in Possession #1 as to Unit B, Unknown Tenants in Possession #2 as to Unit B, If living, and all Unknown Parties claiming by, through, under and against the above named Defendant(s) who are not known to be dead or alive, whether said Unknown Parties may claim an interest as Spouse, Heirs, Devisees, Grantees, or Other Claimants, Appellees.
    Case No. 2D16-2707
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 18, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Marlon Mauric JAMES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-3184
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 18, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    David HITE, DOC #S17948, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-3009
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 18, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    T.L.M., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-3505
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 18, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Xzavirea FLEMMING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-3961
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 18, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Carol A. CHILDRESS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-4014
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 18, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Paul E. REHDER and Patricia Lucille Rehder, Appellants, v. NAPLES ESTATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, an Oregon limited partnership, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-4124
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 18, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Kenneth James HETTEL, Appellant, v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., f/k/a Seaboard Coastline Railroad, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-4306
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 18, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Charles Clarence CAMERON, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-4308
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 18, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Kevin WASHINGTON, Jr., Petitioner, v. PINPOINT REALTY GROUP LLC, and Yiping Wu and Jin Zhang, husband and wife, Respondents.
    Case No. 2D16-4666
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 18, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Reese P. BERT, Doc #Y55096, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-5137
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 18, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Jason W. JENKINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-5295
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 18, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Jose M. VAZQUEZ-TORRES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-5305
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 18, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Charles L. HILL, Jr., DC# C08421, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-5505
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 18, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Lisa Louise SANDS, Appellant, v. Robert JAQUITH, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-559
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 18, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Justin Devon DIGGS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-697
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 18, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Brent ROBERTSON, Appellant, v. Lynn A. ROSS and Jessica Robertson, Appellees.
    Case No. 2D17-511
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 18, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Jacques CORTES-GASCOT, Petitioner, v. Shrinath S. KAMAT, M.D., P.A. d/b/a Bay Area Neurology Associates Raj M. Eliazer, M.D. and Shrinath Sheshgiri Kamat, M.D.; BayCare Health System, Inc. d/b/a St. Joseph's Hospital, Inc.; Pamela B. Wilson, M.D.; Daniel H. Hopkins, D.O.; Bhavik Patel, M.D.; Cogent Healthcare of Pensacola, L.L.C.; Cogent Healthcare, Inc.; Emergency Medical Associates of Tampa Bay, LLC; and Emergency Medical Associates of Florida, LLC, Respondents.
    Case No. 2D17-667
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 18, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Jonston HAYWOOD, a/k/a Johnston Haywood, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-278
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 23, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Desmond Andre BUTLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-3431
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 23, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Terrence JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-899
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 18, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    IN RE Change of Name. Lats AROHA, Appellant.
    Case No. 2D17-2199
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 23, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Nathaniel BORDERS, DC#837898, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-1415
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion file August 23, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Duane JANIKULA a/k/a Duane J. Janikula, Appellants, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY as Trustee FOR HARBORVIEW MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2006-8 ; any and all unknown parties claiming by, through, under, and against the herein named individual defendant(s) who are not known to be dead or alive, whether said unknown parties may claim an interest as spouses, heirs, devisees, grantees, or other claimants; Internal Revenue Service; Waste Pro USA, Inc.; Gail T. Kulick, d/b/a Kulick Law Offices ; TDM Consulting, Inc. ; Summit Capital Corp.; and Sea Gate Homeowners Association, Inc. ; and the Edward J. Olah Irrevocable Trust, Appellees.
    Case No. 2D16-4388
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 23, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Gary TURLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-2849
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 23, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Johnnie B. JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-5532
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 23, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Christopher N. BILYNSKY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-5600
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 23, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Kyle MELADY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-3521
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 23, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Johnny Mack CARTER, IV., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-3493
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 23, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Paul NEWMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-1012
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 23, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    James BANNISTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-5529
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 23, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Lomack THOMPSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-4995
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 23, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Florentino LABANINO-CAMEJO, and F & J Transport Corp., Appellants, v. Isabel GONZALEZ, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-1136
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 23, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Vincent ROBERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-1311
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 23, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.