author: QUINCE, J. POLSTON, J.,

text:
    Robert E. BANKS, Petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, etc., Respondent.
    No. SC16-1478
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    [December 21, 2017]

      Michael Ufferman of Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Tallahassee, Florida, for Petitioner
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Denise M. Harle, Deputy Solicitor General, and Daniel A. Johnson, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, for Respondent
   QUINCE, J.

This case is before the Court for review of the decision of the First District Court of Appeal in Banks v. Jones, 197 So.3d 1152 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016). The district court certified that- its decision is in direct conflict with the decision of the Fifth District Court of Appeal in Holland v. State, 791 So.2d 1256 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001), on the issue of whether a petition for a writ of habeas corpus is the proper vehicle by which to .seek release from close management. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

FACTS

Robert E. Banks was serving a thirty-year sentence for a robbery conviction, Banks, 197 So.3d at 1156. After receiving a disciplinary report for a spitting incident, the Department of Corrections adjudicated Banks guilty for violating department rules, placed him in disciplinary confinement, and revoked 364 days of gain time in addition to issuing a referral reassigning him to the “Close Management I” housing classification. Id,

Banks first, challenged the referral with the Department, which upheld the decision. Banks then filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus with the Eighth Judicial Circuit Court. Id. The Eighth Circuit denied relief, stating that Banks failed to demonstrate that he was entitled to relief. Id. at 1157. Banks filed a petition for a writ of certiorari in the First District, which ordered the Department to show cause why the writ should not be granted. Subsequently, the First District determined to hear the case en banc to determine whether it should recede from its prior precedent. Id.

Reviewing Banks’ claim, the First District stated: “Most pertinent to our decision here is the initial question of whether prisoners in Florida have a protected liberty interest in remaining in the general population, thus necessitating a determination of whether a decision removing a prisoner from the general population for reassignment to Close Management implicates due process requirements.” Id. at 1159 (citing Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472, 115 S.Ct. 2293, 132 L.Ed.2d 418 (1995)). The First District reasoned that “[i]f a liberty interest is not at stake, judicial review ... would be more appropriately considered as an appeal of an administrative decision rather than a claim that a person is being illegally detained.” Id. Although the First District recognized that the Sandin Court “left open the possibility that states could create liberty interests which triggered due process protections,” the court nevertheless reasoned that “Sandin clearly announced that any prison regulation which did not impose an atypical hardship on state prisoners would not implicate due process protections.” Id at 1100 (citing Sandin, 515 U.S. at 481, 115 S.Ct. 2293). So reasoning, the First District announced its decision to “recede from prior decisions ,.. allowing] Close Management decisions to be challenged by writ of habeas corpus.” Id. at 1162. Relying on our decision in Bush v. State, 945 So.2d 1207, 1210 (Fla. 2006), the First District reasoned that because prisoners challenging their assignment to close management were not seeking immediate release, the appropriate vehicle for their claims is a'petition for a writ of mandamus. Banks, 197 So.3d at 1163. Therefore, the First District determined: “[B]ecause habeas corpus review of such claims does not accord the proper deference due the Executive Branch ... we recede from prior decisions of this court which hold that challenges to Close Management housing assignments may be asserted by petition for writ of habeas corpus.” Banks, 197 So.3d at 1155 (citing Magwood v. Tucker, 98 So.3d 725 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012); Kendrick v. McNeil, 6 So.3d 657 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009); Thompson v. Dugger, 509 So.2d 391, 392 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987)).

The First District certified conflict with Holland. Banks sought review in this Court, which we granted.

MOOTNESS

The Department argues that because Banks has been released from close management and transferred to a facility that does not house prisoners in close management quarters, the case is moot and this Court should exercise its discretion and discharge jurisdiction. While the Department is correct that Banks, himself, does not have a current controversy, the First District’s decision is broader than Banks’ dispute, Because the First District receded from over three decades of precedent and circuit courts who would ordinarily review the habeas petitions are bound by its decision, our determination of the certified conflict is necessary for guidance to our trial and appellate courts. Therefore, we decline the State’s offer to discharge jurisdiction. See, e.g., Pino v. Bank of New York, 76 So.3d 927, 927-28 (Fla. 2011) (discussing a certified question of great public importance and stating that the question “transcends the individual parties to this action because it has the potential to impact [the courts] throughout this state and is one on which Florida’s trial courts and litigants need guidance.”); Williams v. State, 957 So.2d 600, 601 (Fla. 2007) (retaining jurisdiction in a certified conflict case despite mootness); State v. Matthews, 891 So.2d 479, 483 (Fla. 2004) (retaining. .discretionary certified conflict jurisdiction despite Matthews’ release from prison because “the question before this Court is of great public importance and is likely to recur”) (citing Holly v. Auld, 450 So.2d 217, 218 n.1 (Fla. 1984)); Enterprise Leasing Co. v. Jones, 789 So.2d 964, 965 (Fla. 2001) (“Although the issue presented in this appeal may be moot as it relates to these parties, the mootness doctrine does not destroy our jurisdiction when the question before us is of great public importance or is likely to recur,”) (citing Gregory v. Rice, 727 So.2d 251, 252 n.1 (Fla. 1999)); N.W. v. State, 767 So.2d 446, 447 n.2 (Fla. 2000) (retaining discretionary certified conflict jurisdiction after the appellant’s community control expired because “this case presents a controversy capable of repetition, yet evading review [and] should be considered on its merits.” (citing Kight v. Dugger, 574 So.2d 1066 (Fla. 1990)).

DISCUSSION

The issue before this Court is whether an inmate may petition for a writ of habeas corpus to challenge his or her placement in Close Management I (CMI) or whether said inmate must file a petition for a writ of mandamus. Because we find that an inmate may have a limited liberty interest in being housed with the general population as compared to CMI depending on the duration of reassignment, we hold that a petition for a writ of habeas corpus remains the correct mechanism by which to challenge a reassignment. We therefore quash the decision of the First District to the extent it holds otherwise and adopt the reasoning of Judge Wolfs concurring in part and dissenting in part opinion.

The United States Supreme Court’s 1983 decision in Hewitt v. Helms, 459 U.S. 460, 103 S.Ct. 864, 74 L.Ed.2d 675 (1983), upon which the First District previously relied, concerned a prisoner’s complaint that the Pennsylvania State Correctional Institution at Huntingdon violated his Fourteenth Amendment due process rights by confining him to administrative segregation within the prison after he assaulted two guards. Id. at 462-63, 103 S.Ct. 864. The Hewitt Court indicated:

While no State may “deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law,” it is well settled that only a limited range of interests fall within this provision. Liberty interests protected by the Fourteenth Amendment may arise from two sources — the Due Process Clause itself and the laws of the States.

Hewitt, 459 U.S. at 466, 103 S.Ct. 864 (citing Meachum v. Fano, 427 U.S. 215, 223-227, 96 S.Ct. 2532, 49 L.Ed.2d 451 (1976)). The Court then opined, “While there is little question on the record before us that [Hewitt’s] confinement added to the restraints on this freedom, we think his argument seeks to draw from the Due Process Clause more than it can provide.” Id. at 467, 103 S.Ct. 864 (footnote omitted). The Hewitt Court recognized:

We have repeatedly said both that prison officials have broad administrative and discretionary authority over the institutions they manage and that lawfully incarcerated persons retain only a narrow range of protected liberty interests. As to the first point, we have recognized that broad discretionary authority is necessary because the administration of a prison is “at best an extraordinarily difficult undertaking,” Wolff v. McDonnell, [ 418 U.S.] at 566 [94 S.Ct. 2963], and have concluded that “to hold ... that any substantial deprivation imposed by prison authorities triggers the procedural protections of the Due Process Clause would subject to judicial review a wide spectrum of discretionary actions that traditionally have been the business of prison administrators rather than of the federal courts.” Meachum v. Fano, [ 427 U.S.] at 225 [96 S.Ct. 2532], As to the second point, our decisions have consistently refused to recognize more than the most basic liberty interests in prisoners. “Lawful incarceration brings about the necessary withdrawal or limitation of many privileges and rights, a retraction justified by. the considerations underlying our penal system.” Price v. Johnston, 334 U.S. 266, 285 [68 S.Ct. 1049, 92 L.Ed. 1356] (1948). Thus, there is no “constitutional or inherent right” to parole, Greenholtz v. Nebraska Penal Inmates, 442 U.S. 1, 7 [99 S.Ct. 2100, 60 L.Ed.2d 668] (1979), and “the Constitution itself does not guarantee good-time credit for satisfactory behavior while in prison,” Wolff v. McDonnell, [ 418 U.S.] at 557 [94 S.Ct. 2963], despite the undoubted impact of such credits on the freedom of inmates. Finally, in Meachum v. Fano, [ 427 U.S.] at 225 [96 S.Ct. 2532], the transfer of a prisoner from one institution to another was found unprotected by “the Due Process Clause in and of itself,” even though the change of facilities involved a significant modification in conditions of confinement, later characterized by the "Court as a “grievous loss.” Moody v. Daggett, 429 U.S. 78, 88 n. 9, 97 S.Ct. 274, 50 L.Ed.2d 236 (1976). As we have held previously, these decisions require that “[a]s long as the conditions or degree of confinement to which the prisoner is subjected is within the sentence imposed upon him and is not otherwise violative of the Constitution, the Due Process Clause does not in itself subject an inmate's treatment by prison authorities to judicial oversight.” Montanye v. Haymes, 427 U.S. 236, 242 [96 S.Ct. 2543, 49 L.Ed.2d 466] (1976). See also Vitek v. Jones, 445 U.S. 480, 493 [100 S.Ct. 1254, 63 L.Ed.2d 552] (1980).

Hewitt, 459 U.S. at 467-68, 103 S.Ct. 864 (emphasis added). The Hewitt Court reasoned, “It is plain that the transfer of an inmate to less amenable and more restrictive quarters for nonpunitive reasons is well within the terms of confinement ordinarily contemplated by a prison sentence.” Id. at 468,103 S.Ct. 864.

The Hewitt Court’s analysis did not end there, however. Instead, the Court determined that a State could create a liberty interest with enactment of regulations governing the administration of state prisons. And, under such an enactment, when the State uses language that is mandatory in nature, the process afforded an inmate must satisfy the minimum requirements of the Due Process Clause. Id. at 469-72,103 S.Ct. 864.

In 1995, the United States Supreme Court reconsidered its ruling in Hewitt. See Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472, 474, 115 S.Ct. 2293, 132 L.Ed.2d 418 (1995) (“We granted certiorari to reexamine the circumstances under which state prison regulations afford inmates a liberty interest protected by the Due Process Clause.”) The Sandin Court determined that the Hewitt approach had “led to the involvement of federal courts in the day-to-day management of prisons, often squandering judicial resources with little offsetting benefit .to anyone.” Id. at 482, 115 S.Ct. 2293. The Court reasoned that the inmate at issue had not been afforded a liberty interest that would entitle him to the procedural protections under Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 94 S.Ct. 2963, 41 L.Ed.2d 935 (1974), stating that his confinement “was within the range of confinement to be normally expected for one serving an indeterminate term of 30 years to life.” Sandin, 515 U.S. at 487, 115 S.Ct. 2293. The Sandin decision, at its core, criticized only the methodology used in Hewitt to determine what liberty interest, if any, was at stake. See Wilkinson v. Austin, 545 U.S. 209, 222, 125 S.Ct. 2384, 162 L.Ed.2d 174 (2005) (“In Sandin, we criticized [the Hewitt] methodology as creating a disincentive for States to promulgate procedures for prison management, and as involving the federal courts in the day-to-day management of prisons.”) (citing Sandin, 515 U.S. at 482-83, 115 S.Ct. 2293). The Court in Wilkinson further pointed out the real impact of the Court’s prior opinion, when.it said:

After Sandin, it is clear that the touchstone of the inquiry into the existence of a protected, state-created liberty interest in avoiding restrictive conditions of confinement is not the language of regulations regarding those conditions but the nature of those conditions themselves “in relation to the ordinary incidents of prison life.”

Id. at 223, 125 S.Ct. 2384 (quoting Sandin, 515 U.S. at 484, 115 S.Ct. 2293) (emphasis added).

The Florida Administrative Code defines close management as “the confinement of an inmate apart from the general population, for reasons of security or the order and effective management of the institution, where the inmate, through his or her behavior, has demonstrated an inability to live in the general population without abusing the' rights and privileges of others.” Fla. Admin. Code R. 33-601.800(l)(d). Close Management I (CMI) “is the most restrictive single cell housing level of all the close management status designations.” Fla. Admin. Code R. 33-601.800(2)(a)l, “An inmate assigned to CMI will be ineligible for a work assignment.” Fla. Admin. Code R. 33-601.800(2)(a)2.

The First District’s analysis of Sandin is contradicted by the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Wilkinson. The holding of Sandin is not, as the Banks majority interprets it, that ah inmate has no liberty interest'in remaining in general population, but that the test to determine whether an inmate’s liberty interest has been infringed is not based on the statutory language but whether the confinement imposes atypical and significant hardship on the inmate in relation to ordinary incidents of prison life. Sandin, 515 U.S. at 484, 115 S.Ct. 2293. A court may appropriately review that question pursuant to an inmate’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The First District’s conclusion that habeas ⅛ not the proper vehicle because there is no liberty interest is based on a misapplication of Sandin and is belied by its own reasoning that a prisoner may still file a petition for a writ of habe-as corpus to allege a violation of the Eighth Amendment even if a successful challenge would, not permit the inmate’s release from prison but only to general population. Banks, 197 So.3d at 1167, (stating that the decision would permit an inmate to file a petition for a writ of habeas corpus to allege a claim that the conditions of Close Management constitute cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment). As reasoned in Judge Wolfs concurring and dissenting opinion, which we adopt here, the determination that Banks is not entitled to relief does not and should not require the full foreclosure of habeas petitions relating to Close Management assignments. Banks, 197 So.3d at 1170-71 (Wolf, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part) (“Inmates segregated- from the general population for a potentially significant period of time should continue to have the same reasonable .court oversight concerning their segregation from the general prison population that they have had since 1982. Insignificant justification has been provided to overturn our precedent and to effectively extinguish this important safeguard.”). The appropriate analysis for the reviewing court is whether an inmate’s assignment to close management constitutes an “atypical, significant deprivation.” See Sandin, 515 U.S. at 484, 486, 115 S.Ct. 2293. In addition to reviewing the details of the assignment, the length of the assignment would also be relevant to the reviewing court’s analysis. Id. (noting that Sandin’s placement was only for thirty days and that his disciplinary record had been expunged). The placement in Wilkinson was indefinite like the placement in Banks and unlike the one in Sandin. Id. at 224, 125 S.Ct. 2384. Also, an inmate’s loss of gain time and the length of his or her sentence would be relevant to the reviewing court’s analysis.

For the foregoing reasons, we quash the en banc decision of the First District below and approve of the conflict case. Because Banks has been released, we decline to address the second issue presented.

It is so ordered.

LABARGA; C.J., and PARIENTE, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

POLSTON, J., dissents with an opinion, in which CANADY and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

POLSTON, J.,

dissenting.

Because reassignment to close management does not establish a liberty interest sufficient to trigger the protection of the Due Process Clause, I would approve the decision of the. First District Court of Appeal and hold that inmates may hot challenge their close management status by petition for writ of habeas corpus, but must do so by petition for writ of mandamus, as held below. Therefore, I respectfully dissent.

The Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution provides that “[n]o State shall ... deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.” A Fourteenth Amendment liberty interest may originate either from the Due Process Clause itself or from state law. Meachum v. Fano, 427 U.S. 215, 225-26, 96 S.Ct. 2532, 49 L.Ed.2d 451 (1976). In Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 556-58, 94 S.Ct. 2963, 41 L.Ed.2d 935 (1974), the United States Supreme Court determined that a statutory provision that dictated mandatory reductions in prison sentences for good behavior created a liberty interest in an inmate’s particular sentence such that procedural due process protections applied in prison disciplinary proceedings. Thereafter in Meachum, the United States Supreme Court determined that the Due Process Clause is not implicated in every change in an inmate’s conditions of confinement, holding that an inmate does not possess a liberty interest in being free from transfers between prison facilities. 427 U.S. at 224-25, 96 S.Ct. 2532. Following Wolff and Meachum, the United States Supreme Court in Hewitt v. Helms, 459 U.S. 460, 471, 103 S.Ct. 864, 74 L.Ed.2d 675 (1983), shifted the analysis to whether the state action “used language of'an unmistakably mandatory character” to determine whether a protected liberty interest was created.

Importantly, the United States Supreme Court in Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472, 481-83, 115 S.Ct. 2293, 132 L.Ed.2d 418 (1995), refocused the approach to defining liberty interests by analyzing “the nature of the deprivation” experienced by the inmate as opposed to the mandatory language of a state regulation. In Sandin, the United States Supreme Court examined the due process claims of an inmate who was sentenced to 30 days of disciplinary confinement. Id at 475-76, 115 S.Ct. 2293. The Court pointed out the flawed analysis adopted in Hewitt, noting “that the search for a negative implication from mandatory language in prisoner- regulations has strayed from the real concerns undergird-ing the liberty protected by the Due Process Clause.” Id. at 483, 115 S.Ct. 2293. The Court recognized that although a State may create protected liberty interests through regulations or policies, those “interests will be generally limited to freedom from restraint which ... imposes atypical and significant hardship on the inmate in relation to the ordinary incidents of prison life.” Id. at 484,115 S.Ct. 2293. If the conditions of confinement do not impose an “atypical and significant-hardship on the inmate,” there is no constitutionally protected liberty interest in avoiding restrictive confinement conditions. Id at 483-86, 115 S.Ct. 2293. Specifically, due process protection is triggered if the conditions of confinement “present a dramatic departure from the basic conditions of [an inmate’s] indeterminate sentence.” Id at 485,115 S.Ct. 2293.

Focusing on the nature of the confinement instead of the language of the regulations, thé United States Supreme Court in Sandin examined the nature of the 30-day disciplinary- confinement and concluded that “[b]ased on a comparison between inmates inside and outside disciplinary segregation, the State’s actions in placing him there for 30 days did not work a major disruption in his environment.” Id. at 486, 115 S.Ct. 2293. Accordingly, the Court held that “neither the Hawaii prison regulation in question, nor the Due Process Clause itself, afforded [the inmate] a ■ protected liberty interest that would entitle him to the procedural protections set forth in Wolff.” Id. at 487, 115 S.Ct. 2293. The 30-day disciplinary confinement “did not present the type of atypical, significant deprivation in which a State might conceivably create a liberty interest.” Id. at 486, 115 S.Ct. 2293.

The liberty interest inquiry articulated in Sandin requires a determination of whether assignment to close management “imposes atypical and significant hardship on the inmate in relation to the ordinary incidents of prison life.” Id. at 484, 115 S.Ct. 2293. Then, in Wilkinson v. Austin, 545 U.S. 209, 223, 125 S.Ct. 2384, 162 L.Ed.2d 174 (2005), the United States Supreme Court reiterated “that -the touchstone of the inquiry into the existence of a protected, state-created-liberty interest in avoiding restrictive conditions of confinement is not the language of regulations regarding those conditions but the nature of those conditions themselves ‘in relation to the ordinary incidents of prison life.’ ” (quoting Sandin, 515 U.S. at 484, 115 S.Ct. 2293).

Here, because assignment to close management does not present conditions where an inmate would suffer an atypical and significant hardship, no procedural due process is due. The conditions of confinement under the close management classification are as follows:

When assigned to Close Management housing, the inmate is visited regularly by Department staff, and irregularly by other staff, to ensure the inmate’s safety and health. Fla. Admin. Code. R. 33-601.800(15). Daily visits are conducted by medical personnel, the institution’s housing supervisor, and the officer supervising the correctional - staff; weekly visits are conducted by the warden and assistant wardens, the security chief, and a classification officer. A Chaplain also visits weekly, and can visit more often if requested and if the Chaplain’s schedule permits.
Close Management inmates may possess certain personal items, including hygiene items, electronic devices for listening to music, religious literature, pérsonal property that does not pose security risks, writing paper, stamps, envelopes, and security pens to facilitate correspondence. Close Management inmates ' may conduct their legal affairs, have access to approved reading material and borrow library books, subscribe to magazines and newspapers, and use in-cell education and wellness opportunities. If the Close Management inmate does not violate a significant institutional rule, they may conduct bank transactions and order from the canteen. Fla. Admin. Code. R. 33-601.800(10)(g).
Close Management inmates may have visitors by appointment. In addition, they are allotted six hours of outdoor exercise each week. Inmates assigned to CM II- and CM III may obtain work assignments. Fla. Admin. Code. R. 33-601.800(10)(m) <& (13). To provide incentive for improved behavior, privileges may increase as the inmate progresses to more lenient Close Management status. .Fla. Admin. Code. R. 33-601.800(11).

Banks v. Jones, 197 So.3d 1152, 1158 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016).

As to the duration of confinement, placement in close management is reviewed as follows:

During the'first 60 days of Close Management, the inmate’s placement is reviewed weekly by a member of the institution’s Classification Team; following that, review is monthly. Fla. Admin. Code. R. 33-601.800(16)(a). After six months, the inmate’s Classification Officer interviews and assesses the inmate, the previous placement decision, and whether a change in status is advisable. Fla. Admin. Code. R. 33-601.800(16)(c). In addition, the State’s Classification Officer interviews the inmate no less often than every six months to determine whether the status remains appropriate or must be modified, including whether the inmate should be reassigned to the general population. Fla. Admin. Code. R. 33-601.800(16)(e).

Id.

Although close management inmates experience more restrictive conditions than inmates in the general population, that fact does not render such confinement atypical or a significant hardship. The regulations outlining the parameters of confinement in close management do not present conditions that are atypical of those experienced by the general population. Inmates in close management retain personal property, including a radio for listening to music, -writing paper and a security pen, personal hygiene items, and reading materials. See Fla. Admin. Code. R. 33-601.800(10). Close management Inmates may conduct their legal affairs with access to the law library and personal legal papers. See Fla. Admin. Code. R. 33-601.800(10)©. An exercise schedule ensures a-minimum of six hours of outdoor exercise per week. See Fla. Admin. Code. R. 33-601.800(10)(m). Without a major rule violation, close management inmates may make canteen purchases. See Fla. Admin. Code. R. 33-601.800(10)(g). Inmates assigned to all but the most restrictive close management status are eligible for work assignments. See Fla. Admin. Code. R. 33-601.800(13). Additionally, close management inmates may have visitors by appointment, and are visited regularly by staff. See Fla. Admin. Code. R. 33-601.800(11), (15). Accordingly, reassignment to close management “is not dissimilar to a transfer from a less-secure to a more-secure institution, where a prisoner must adapt to more burdensome and strict living conditions.” Banks, 197 So.3d at 1161. The conditions of confinement in close management are ' insufficient ' to “present the type of atypical, significant deprivation in which a State might conceivably create a liberty interest.” See Sandin, 515 U.S. at 486, 115 S.Ct. 2293. Therefore, Banks does not have a protected liberty interest to remain in the general population.

The majority concludes that confinement in close management creates a liberty interest because it erroneously determines that the conditions are analogous -to the assignment to a supermax facility such as the one at issue in Wilkinson. See majority op. at 969 (“The placement in Wilkinson was indefinite like the placement in Banks and unlike the one in Sandin.”). In Wilkinson, the United- States Supreme -Court found that inmates had a constitutionally protected liberty interest in avoiding assignment to a state supermax facility. 545 U.S. at 213, 125 S.Ct. 2384. In comparing the conditions between general population and disciplinary segregation.to a supermax prison, the United States Supreme Court focused on the extreme isolation of- the restrictive confinement where inmates were “deprived of almost any environmental or sensory stimuli and of almost all human contact,” Id. at 214, 125 S.Ct. 2384. Specifically, for inmates in the supermax facility “almost all- human contact is prohibited, even to the point that conversation is not permitted from cell to cell; the light, though it may be dimmed, is on for 24 hours; exercise is for 1 hour per day, but only in a small indoor room.” Id. at 223-24, 125 S.Ct. 2384. The duration of “placement at [the supermax facility] is for an indefinite period of time, limited only by an inmate's sentence,” and “[i]nmates otherwise eligible for parole lose their eligibility while incarcerated at [the supermax facility].” Id. át 214-15, 125 S.Ct. 2384. The United States Supreme Court determined that the conditions associated with assignment to the supermax facility imposed an atypical and significant -hardship when compared to conditions' associated With general population, implicating a liberty interest. Id. at 223-24, 125 S.Ct. 2384.

However, the conditions of confinement experienced by close management inmates are materially different than the conditions of the supermax facility the Supreme Court found to be atypical in Wilkinson. Unlike the inmates in Wilkinson, close management inmates are not deprived of all environmental or sensory stimuli or all human contact. Close management inmates are afforded regular contact with staff and visitors by appointment, 6 hours outdoor recreation every week, placement review weekly during the first 60 days, monthly after that, and formal review after 6 months and every 6 months following. Therefore, I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that the conditions of close management are analogous to placement in the supermax facility, rendering such confinement atypical.

Moreover, without a liberty, interest to remain in the general population, habeas corpus is not the proper mechanism to challenge the reassignment to close management-, Habeas exists as a remedy for restraints on individual liberty, and without a liberty interest that would trigger due process protections, no remedy could be achieved through a petition for writ of habeas corpus. See Sneed v. Mayo, 66 So.2d 865, 869 (Fla. 1953) (“The great writ of habeas corpus is a writ of right obtainable under our Constitution by all men who claim to be unlawfully imprisoned against their will. It is designed to test solely the legality of the petitioner’s imprisonment, and may not be used as a substitute for appeal.”); see generally Bush v. State, 945 So.2d 1207, 1210 (Fla. 2006) (“[I]f the prisoner alleges entitlement to immediate release, a petition for writ of habeas corpus is the proper remedy .... ”); Murray v. Regier, 872 So.2d 217, 222 (Fla. 2002) (“[T]he traditional purpose of the writ of habeas corpus is to furnish a ... remedy to one whose liberty is unlawfully restrained.”).

Therefore, as the First District explained, inmates may challenge their status of close management through mandamus relief by asserting that the detention is not supported by the agency’s rules. See Banks, 197 So.3d at 1167 (“[I]f a prisoner alleges he has been deprived of the periodic review required by the rules ... he may be entitled to mandamus relief; merely disagreeing with the Department’s discretionary decisions cannot show entitlement to relief, as there would be no showing of a ‘clear legal right.’ ”).

To summarize, because inmates do not possess a liberty interest in avoiding assignment to close management, mandamus is the proper vehicle to seek release from close management. Therefore, I would approve the decision of the First District. I respectfully dissent.

CANADY and LAWSON, JJ„ concur.

      . Id at 1160 (citing Board of Pardons v. Allen, 482 U.S, 369, 107 S.Ct. 2415, 96 L.Ed.2d 303 (1987); Washington v. Harper, 494 U.S. 210, 110 S.Ct. 1028, 108 L.Ed.2d 178 (1990); Vitek v. Jones, 445 U.S. 480, 100 S.Ct. 1254, 63 L.Ed.2d 552 (1980)).

      . The decision in Holland, in its entirety, states:
      Holland appeals from an order of the circuit court, which denied his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, Jn the petition, Holland sought to compel {he Secretary of the Florida Department of Corrections to release him from "close management,” and return him to the general population of the prison where he is incarcerated (North Florida Reception Center). The circuit court found that Holland had been placed in "close management” because of a long series of disciplinary infractions.
      In this petition, Holland has raised no issue concerning harassment, lack of due process, failure of the state to comply with its own rules regarding “close management,” or other grounds, which would provide a basis to grant his release from."close management." Under these circumstances, as he is legally confined in prison, the writ was properly denied.
      Holland, 791 So.2d at 1257 (footnotes omitted).

      . Federal courts in Florida have continued to consider prisoners’ federal habeas claims regarding confinement classifications post-Sandin. See, e.g., Whitsett v. Cannon, 139 F.Supp.3d 1293 (Fla. M.D. 2015).

      , As Justice Breyer explains in his dissent:
      Thus, this Court has said that certain changes in conditions may be so severe or so différent from ordinary conditions of confinement that, whether or not state law gives state authorities broad discretionary power to impose them, the state authorities may not do so "without complying with minimum requirements of due process.” Vitek v. Jones, 445 U.S. 480, 491-494 [100 S.Ct. 1254, 63 L.Ed.2d 552] (1980) (“involuntary commitment to a mental hospital”): Washington v. Harper, 494 U.S. 210, 221-222 [110 S.Ct. 1028, 108 L.Ed.2d 178] (1990) ("unwanted administration of anti-psychotic drugs”).
      Sandin, 515 U.S. at 493 [115 S.Ct. 2293] (Breyer, J., dissenting).

      . Here, Banks lost 364 days of gain time but he did not challenge the loss. The Sandin Court also left open for review “State’s actions [that] will inevitably affect the duration of [an inmate's] sentence.” Sandin, 515 U.S. at 487 [115 S.Ct. 2293], The Department illogically argues that Banks' loss of gain time is not relevant to this Court's decision because Banks did "not assert that any gain time he would have earned could entitled him to ... early release from his 30-year prison sentence.” Resp't’s Answer Br. at 22.


source: Caselaw Access Project

license: Public Domain

text:
    Ben R. WOODS, Sr., Appellant, v. VENTURES TRUST 2013-I-NH BY MCM CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC, its Trustee, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-2650
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed August 9, 2017
   An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Charles 0. Mitchell, Jr., Judge.

AFFIRMED.


text:
    SIKES CONCRETE, INC., and American Fire and Casualty Company, Appellants, v. BREAK-N-GROUND, LLC, Rhonda Williams, Nicholas Williams, Reed Holloway, and David Runyon a/k/a David White a/k/a Mickey White a/k/a “DW”, Appellees.
    CASE NOS. 1D16-2054
    1D16-4018
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed August 9, 2017
   An appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County. James B. Fensom, Judge.

AFFIRMED.


text:
    John Ellis HOLMES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-292
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed August 9, 2017
   An appeal from the Circuit Court for Washington County. Christopher N. Patterson, Judge.

AFFIRMED.


text:
    Joseph Michael DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-5041
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed August 14, 2017
   An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. Darlene F. Dickey, Judge.

DISMISSED.


text:
    Thomas TATE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-3266
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed August 14, 2017
   An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County. James 0. Shelter, Judge.

AFFIRMED.


text:
    Milton J. COLLIER, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-1679
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed August 16, 2017
   An appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County. Mark W. Moseley, Judge.

AFFIRMED.


text:
    Jeremy Allen SNYDER, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Appellees.
    CASE NO. 1D16-5684
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed August 16, 2017
   An appeal from an order of Judge of Compensation Claims. William R. Holley, Judge.

AFFIRMED.


text:
    Dennis T. HUTTO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-5646
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed August 16, 2017
   An appeal from the Circuit Court for Nassau County. Robert M. Foster, Judge.

DISMISSED.


text:
    CONTINENTAL GRANITE AND MARBLE, INC., and Southern Owners Insurance Co./Auto-Owners Insurance Group, Appellants, v. Frank PINTO-MONTERO, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-3615
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed August 16, 2017
   An appeal from an order of Judge of Compensation Claims. Wilbur W. Anderson, Judge.

Date of Accident: December 5, 2012.

AFFIRMED.


text:
    George HENDERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-3353
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed August 16, 2017.
   An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County. Kevin J. Carroll, Judge.

AFFIRMED.


text:
    Craig SCOTT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D15-5002
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed August 16, 2017.
   An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Kevin A. Blazs, Judge.

AFFIRMED,


text:
    Jaloni MCGHEE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-2452
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed August 16, 2017.
   An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval-County. Adrian Soud, Judge.

AFFIRMED.


text:
    Earnest DIALS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-1323
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed August 16, 2017
   An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. John L. Miller, Judge.

AFFIRMED.


text:
    Steven Mark RILEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-4758
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed August 16, 2017.
   An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Linda F. McCallum, Judge.

AFFIRMED.


text:
    Reginald A. WALKER, Appellant, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-4753
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed August 16, 2017
    Rehearing Denied December 5, 2017
   An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County. Terry P. Lewis, Judge.

AFFIRMED.


text:
    Robert COHEN, Appellant, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, and Florida Department of Corrections, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-4741
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed August 16, 2017.
   An appeal from the Circuit Court for Columbia County. Paul S. Bryan, Judge.

AFFIRMED.


text:
    Richard GOODMAN, DDS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-3447
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed August 16, 2017
   An appeal from the Agency for Health Care Administration. Elizabeth Dudek, Secretary.

AFFIRMED.


text:
    John BRADFORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-3113
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed August 16, 2017
    Rehearing Denied September 26, 2017
   An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County. Angela C. Dempsey, Judge.

AFFIRMED.


text:
    Roy H. MIDDLETON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-1890
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed August 18, 2017.
   An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. Jan Shackelford, Judge.

AFFIRMED.


text:
    Michael L. CRUMP, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-1673
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed August 18, 2017
   An appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County. John T. Brown, Judge.

AFFIRMED.


text:
    James Lewis GIBSON Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-1291
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed August 18, 2017
   An appeal from the Circuit Court for Baker County. James Colaw, Judge.

AFFIRMED.


text:
    Jamale E. SMALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D1D16-1976
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed August 18, 2017
   An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Waddell A. Wallace, Judge.

AFFIRMED.


text:
    Frederick M. JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-76
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed August 18, 2017
   An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County. Terry P. Lewis, Judge.

AFFIRMED.


text:
    Robert Lee INMON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-1178
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed August 18, 2017.
   An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Russell L. Healey, Judge.

AFFIRMED.


text:
    Isaac JACKSON, III, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-3375
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed August 18, 2017
   An appeal from the Circuit Court for Taylor County. Gregory S. Parker, Judge.

AFFIRMED.


text:
    Harley William LEAMON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-0579
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed August 22, 2017
   An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County. James C. Hankinson, Judge.

AFFIRMED.


text:
    Caslelderrick BLACK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-2559
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed August 22, 2017
   An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County. Angela C. Dempsey, Judge.

AFFIRMED.


text:
    David B. WINDHAM, Appellant, v. FLORIDA COASTAL SCHOOL OF LAW, INC., a For-Profit Corporation, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-2501
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed August 22, 2017
   An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Virginia Norton, Judge.

AFFIRMED.


text:
    GREEN TREE SERVICING LLC, Appellant, v. Julie POOSER a/k/a Julie Ann Pooser, et al., Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-1820
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed August 22, 2017
    Rehearing Denied September 29, 2017
   An appeal from the Circuit Court for Walton County. Kelvin C. Wells, Judge.

AFFIRMED.


text:
    Joseph Cain JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-560
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed August 22, 2017
   An appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County. Michael Flowers, Judge.

AFFIRMED.


text:
    James D. SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D15-5910
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed August 22, 2017
   An appeal from the Circuit Court for Holmes County. Christopher N. Patterson, Judge.

AFFIRMED.


text:
    Steven F. D’AMICO, Appellant, v. Kelsey THARP, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-5606
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed August 22, 2017
   An appeal from the Circuit Court for Hamilton County. Andrew J. Decker, III, Judge.

AFFIRMED.


text:
    Eddie RILEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-5048
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed August 22, 2017
    Rehearing Denied September 22, 2017.
   An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County. James Hankinson, Judge.

AFFIRMED.


text:
    A.S., Mother of I.T.S. and F.S.K., Minor Children, Appellant, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-2121
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed August 22, 2017
   An appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County. Brantley S. Clark, Jr., Judge.

AFFIRMED.


text:
    Anthony R. GRIEGO, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    CASE NO. 1D17-3157
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed August 24, 2017
   Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus-Original Jurisdiction.

Denied.


text:
    Poul Wesley SPRADLING, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    CASE NO. 1D17-3090
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed August 24, 2017
   Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel — Original Jurisdiction.

Denied.


text:
    Jeffrey Lance HILL, Sr., Appellant, v. SUWANNEE RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT and Linda Petry Hill, Appellees.
    CASE NO. 1D17-2979
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed August 24, 2017
    Rehearing Denied September 27, 2017
   An appeal from the Circuit Court for Columbia County. William F. Williams, Judge.

DISMISSED.


text:
    James COLLINS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    CASE NO. 1D17-2921
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed August 24, 2017
   Petition for Writ of Prohibition — Original Jurisdiction.

Denied.


text:
    Raymond L. WHITE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    CASE NO. 1D17-2681
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed August 24, 2017.
   Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus— Original Jurisdiction.

Denied.


text:
    Taylor Ashley WRIGHT, Former Wife, Appellant, v. Jeffrey David WRIGHT, Former Husband, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-2547
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed August 24, 2017
   An appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County. Mary Poison, Judge.

DISMISSED.


text:
    Corey GREGG, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-1735
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed August 24, 2017
   An appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County. Mark W. Moseley, Judge.

AFFIRMED.


text:
    Artiez Simon INGRAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-103
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed August 24, 2017
   An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Waddell A. Wallace, Judge.

AFFIRMED.


text:
    Omar ROMERO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D15-5026
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed August 24, 2017.
   An appeal from the Circuit Court for Walton County. Kelvin C. Wells, Judge.

AFFIRMED.


text:
    Simone SWANIGAN, Appellant, v. Stevie SWANIGAN, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-5272
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed August 24, 2017
   An appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County. John “Jay” Gontarek, Judge.

AFFIRMED.


text:
    Billy T. DAUGHERTY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    CASE NO. 1D17-3106
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed August 24, 2017.
   Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus— Original Jurisdiction.

Denied.


text:
    Jaterrance GOODMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-4751
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed August 24, 2017
   An appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County. Michael C. Overstreet, Judge.

AFFIRMED.


text:
    Andre GRIFFIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-4709
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed August 24, 2017.
   An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Linda F. McCallum, Judge.

AFFIRMED.


text:
    Elgardo AJ GARCIA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-5412
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed August 24, 2017
   An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Waddell A. Wallace, Judge.

AFFIRMED.


text:
    Terrance Lamar JACKSON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    CASE NO. 1D17-1406
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed August 24, 2017
   Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel — Original Jurisdiction.

Denied.


text:
    Kenneth Dean KNIGHT, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-275
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed August 24, 2017.
   An appeal from the Circuit- Court for Escambia County. J. Scott Duncan, Judge.

AFFIRMED.


text:
    Jimmy Dale ROBERTSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-2560
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed August 24, 2017
   An appeal from an order of the Duval County Circuit Court. Mark J. Borello, Judge.

AFFIRMED.


text:
    Z.R., Mother of S.W., P.L. and S.P., Minor Children, Appellant, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-2386
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed August 25, 2017
   ' An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. Michael G. Allen, Judge.

AFFIRMED.


text:
    Sylvio PARENT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-1556
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed August 25, 2017
   An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Waddell A. Wallace, Judge.

AFFIRMED.


text:
    W.A.W., a Child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-1433
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed August 25, 2017
   An appeal from the Circuit Court for Baker County. Stanley H. Griffis, Judge.

AFFIRMED.


text:
    Dionte STALLWORTH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-0843
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed August 25, 2017
   An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Escambia County. John L. Miller, Judge.

AFFIRMED.


text:
    Robert J. ROSADO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-0104
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed August 25, 2017
   An appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County. John F. Simon, Judge.

AFFIRMED.


text:
    Augustus BEVERLY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-1692
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed August 25, 2017
   An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County. Kevin J, Carroll, Judge.

AFFIRMED.


text:
    Brian Cameron HUCKABY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-78
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed August 25, 2017
   An appeal from the Circuit Court for Washington County. Christopher N. Patterson, Judge.

AFFIRMED.


text:
    Timothy S. MORIARTY, Petitioner, v. SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, Respondent.
    CASE NO. 1D17-2736
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed August 25, 2017
   Petition for Issuance of Injunction— Original Jurisdiction.

DENIED.


text:
    Charles Edward DUKES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-3158
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 3, 2017
   Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Thomas W. Krug, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    Christopher Iain DENNIS, Doc # S15629, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-3353
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 3, 2017
   Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Thomas Krug, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    Lamont ALLEN, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-3365
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 3, 2017
   Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Manatee County; Charles E. Roberts, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    Apollo L. HARDIN, Doc #R27963, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-3375
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 3, 2017
   Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pi-nellas County; Philip J. Federico, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    Vincent PATTERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-3387
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 3, 2017.
   Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pi-nellas County; Philip J. Federico, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    Michael J. MILLS, Doc # R07045, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-3406
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 3, 2017
   Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pi-nellas County; Joseph A. Bulone, Judge,

Affirmed.


text:
    Cleveland SANDERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-3418
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 3, 2017
   Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinel-las County; Philip J. Federico, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    Mesi WILLIAMS, Doc #N11987, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-3443
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 3, 2017.
   Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hen-dry County; James D. Sloan, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    Bideau JEAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-3461
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 3, 2017
   Appeal from the Circuit Court for Charlotte County; Donald H. Mason, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    Joel Don ADAMS, Doc #050233, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-3462
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 3, 2017
   Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Roger A. Alcott and Kelly P. Butz, Judges.

Affirmed.


text:
    Marcus Earl BROOKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-3473
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 3, 2017
   Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P, 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pi-nellas County; Philip J. Federico, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    Stanley D. COBB, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-3522
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 3, 2017
   Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pi-nellas County; Philip J. Federico, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    Keith Allen SHEPERD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-3544
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 3, 2017
   Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Kimberly K. Fernandez, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    Eric GALLENTINE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-3551
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 3, 2017.
   Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Thomas Krug, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    Charles E. LEWIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D15-2742
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 3, 2017.
   Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Kelly P. Butz, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    Karen WOOD, Appellant, v. WALGREEN COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D15-4569
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 3, 2017.
   Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinel-las County; Jack Day, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    Leslie WILSON and Robert T. Wilson, Sr., Appellants, v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSN., Appellee.
    Case No. 2D15-5291
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 3, 2017
   Appeal from the Circuit Court for Charlotte County; Lisa S. Porter, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    Trevor MCCARTHY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-1008
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 3, 2017
   Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hills-borough County; William Fuente, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    IN the INTEREST OF R.P. and R.P., children. O.P.-H., Appellant, v. Department of Children & Families and Guardian Ad Litem Program, Appellees.
    Case No. 2D16-1064
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 3, 2017
   Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hills-borough County; Laura E. Ward, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    Lisa-Maria CARTER, Appellant, v. FLORIDA HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER, INC., d/b/a Tampa General Hospital, and the Board of Trustees of the University of South Florida d/b/a University of South Florida Health d/b/a University of South Florida College of Medicine; Larry Roy Glazerman, M.D., Appellees.
    Case No. 2D16-1120
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 3, 2017.
   Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hills-borough County; Mark R. Wolfe, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    D’Angelo Lavelle DIXON, Doc #766755 Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-3604
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 3, 2017.
   Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hen-dry County; James D. Sloan, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    IN the INTEREST OF R.P. and R.P., children. Y.L.G., Appellant, v. Department of Children & Families and Guardian Ad Litem Program, Appellees.
    Case No. 2D16-690
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 3, 2017
   Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hills-borough County; Laura Ward, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    Sean Will BELLER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-365
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    February 1, 2017
   L.T. No.: 14-19568-CF

Denied.


text:
    Susan GILBERT, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Damen Gilbert, Deceased, Appellant, v. CRYPTICAL DEVELOPMENT, LLC, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-3013
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 3, 2017
   Appeal from the Circuit Court for Manatee County; Diana Moreland, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    John T. PATRICK, Appellant, v. Richard HESS and Meredith Hess, husband and wife, and Lucre, Inc., a Nevada corporation, Appellees.
    Case No. 2D15-5449
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 3, 2017.
   Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County; Keith R. Kyle, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    Reginald KIT, Jr., Appellant, v. Ashley GARBER, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D15-1212
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 8, 2017.
   Appeal from the Circuit Court for Manatee County; Edward Nicholas, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    Ryan D. MAAS and Becki R. Maas, Appellants, v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D15-1552
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 8, 2017.
   Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hills-borough County; Wayne S. Timmerman, Senior Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    Reginald KIT, Jr., Appellant, v. Ashley GARBER, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D15-2737
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 8, 2017
   Appeal from the Circuit Court for Manatee County; Edward Nicholas, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    Toni KELLY, Appellant, v. NU IMAGE CLAIMS, INC., Appellee.
    Case No. 2D15-3795
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 8, 2017
   Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County; John E. Duryea, Jr., Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    Wiley T. MCCALL and Nancy McCall, Appellants, v. TEXAS 1845, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company; Plane Crackers, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company; and South Florida Sod, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Appellees.
    Case No. 2D15-5406
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 8, 2017.
   Appeal from the Circuit Court for Highlands County; Peter F. Estrada, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    Brian M. MORALES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-1789
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 8, 2017.
   Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Michelle Sisco, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    Adam AGUILAR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D15-4662
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 8, 2017.
   Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Thomas Krug, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    Jimmy LEEKS a/k/a Jimmie Jerome Leeks, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-1938
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 8, 2017
   Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Kelly P. Butz, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    Bonnie Nicole GAULT, Appellant, v. Tyrone Francis BOYCE, Jr., Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-2401
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 8, 2017
   Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Michelle Pincket, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    Roland Daniel DETOUCHE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-2491
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 8, 2017.
   Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Thomas Krug, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    K.E., a Child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-2620
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 8, 2017
   Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hills-borough County; Barbara Twine Thomas, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    Eugene H. HENRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-2880
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 8, 2017.
   Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Lee County; J. Frank Porter, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    Stanley R. KLIEM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-3492
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 8, 2017.
   Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Lee County; Ramiro Manalich, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    Walter D. DANIELS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-2895
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 8, 2017
   Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Lee County; Ramiro Manalich, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    Ishmel R. SASSER, DC# R38917, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-3419
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 8, 2017.
   Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pi-nellas County; Philip J. Federico, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    Andrew JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-3400
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 8, 2017.
   Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pi-nellas County; Joseph A, Bulone, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    Linda L.SHAFFER, Appellant, v. MCCORMICK 106 LLC, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-3063
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 8, 2017
   Appeal from the Circuit Court for Manatee County; Thomas M. Gallen, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    Donnie Lamar KELLY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-3440
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 8, 2017
   Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pas-co County; Susan G. Barthle, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    Stephen Robert BAKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-3467
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 8, 2017.
   Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Highlands County; Peter F. Estrada, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    Lenny RUIZ, DC# Y41480, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-3478
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 8, 2017.
   Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Lee County; Joseph C. Fuller, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    Missa BILLIB, DOC #S08669, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-3716
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 8, 2017.
   Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Thomas Krug, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    Kenneth BOYD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-3764
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 8, 2017.
   Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Polk County; John K. Stargel, Judge,

Affirmed.


text:
    Christopher LIPPETTE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-3948
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 8, 2017.
   Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Polk County; J. Dale Durrance and J. Kevin Abdoney, Judges.

Affirmed.


text:
    Cecilia WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-3980
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 8, 2017.
   Appeal' pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Manatee County; Susan B. Maulueci, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    PLACIDA POINTE HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., a Florida non-profit Corporation, Appellant, v. PLACIDA HARBOUR CLUB, INC., a Florida not-for-profit Corporation, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-413
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 8, 2017.
   Appeal from the Circuit Court for Charlotte County; Lisa S. Porter, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    Harold C. GRAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-4226
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 8, 2017.
   Appeal pursuant to Fla.' R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pi-nellas County; Philip J. Federico, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    T.L., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-458
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 8, 2017.
   Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hills-borough County; Barbara Twine Thomas, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    Justin Glenn BEATSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-482
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 8, 2017.
   Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County; James R. Thompson, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    Karen McNulty BARBER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-1663
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 8, 2017
   Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pi-nellas County; Michael F. Andrews, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    Sammie WILLIAMS, a/k/a Sammie Lee Williams, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-2900
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 8, 2017
   Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Glenn T. Shelby, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    Christopher Michael BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-4227
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 8, 2017
   Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Highlands County; Peter F. Estrada, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    Derick TAVAREZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-1806
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 8, 2017
   Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hills-borough County; William Fuente and Vivian T. Corvo, Judges.

Affirmed.


text:
    Dennis GUYTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-3296
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 8, 2017
   Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Christopher C. Sa-bella, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    Leshae A. ASHLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-3410
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 8, 2017.
   Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Lee County; Ramiro Manalich, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    Daniel D. LANGMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-3490
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 8, 2017
   Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App, P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Highlands County; Peter F. Estrada, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    Rashawn D. HUTCHINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-3556
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 8, 2017
   Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Michelle Sisco, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    Bernard BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-3603
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 8, 2017.
   Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Wayne S. Timmer-man and Lisa D. Campbell, Judges.

Affirmed.


text:
    Felipe GRIFALDO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-4199
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 8, 2017.
   Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Gregory P. Holder, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    Robert Lee DIXON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-4217
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 8, 2017
   Appeal pursuant to Fla, R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Christopher C. Sa-bella, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    Jercore R. JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee,
    Case No. 2D16-5542
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 8, 2017.
   Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit’ Court for Pi-nellas County; Anthony Rondolino, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    Lee Grace DOUGHERTY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-3554
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 8, 2017.
   Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pas-co County; Susan G. Barthle, Judge.

Dismissed.


text:
    Brian C. DELEONARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-4060
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 8, 2017
   Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pas-co County; Pat Siracusa, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    Michael D. GRIDER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-4209
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 8, 2017
   Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Lisa D. Campbell, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    Phillip MCMILLAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-4228
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 8, 2017.
   Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Kelly P. Butz, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    Michael E. CUMMINGS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-4272
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 8, 2017
   Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Vivian T. Corvo, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    Kevin AUSTIN and Amy Austin, Appellants, v. U.S. BANK, N.A., as Trustee for TBW Mortgage-Backed Trust Series 2006-2, TBW Mortgage-Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-2, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-445
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 8, 2017
   Appeal from the Circuit Court for Collier County; Cynthia Pivacek, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    Lisa HICKS, Appellant, v. CIRCLE K STORES, INC., Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-3319
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 15, 2017.
   Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hills-borough County; Rex M. Barbas, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    Kenneth M. JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-4278
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 15, 2017.
   Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pi-nellas County; Chris Helinger, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    Daniel GORMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-1914
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 17, 2017.
   Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Polk County; James A. Yancey, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    Louis A. CAPDEVILA, Appellant, v. Domenick TRAINA and Felice Traina, Appellees.
    Case No. 2D16-2586
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 17, 2017.
   Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hills-borough County; Richard A. Nielsen, Judge.

Affirmed.


text:
    Deborah Rose MCDANIELS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Kenneth Claude MCDANIELS, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D16-5340
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 16, 2017
   L.T. No.: 2014-DR-005873

Dismissed.


text:
    Dean Jackson POPE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D16-3069
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 20, 2017
   Dismissed.


text:
    STATE of Florida, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Darryl Len MORGAN, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-0239
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 20, 2017
   L.T. No.: CRC79-03874CFASO

Dismissed.


text:
    Alberto SANCHEZ, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D16-1286
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 20, 2017
   L.T. No.: 13-CF-8713

Granted. Dismissed.


text:
    DYCK-O’NEAL, INC., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Arsenio CASTILLO, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D16-4046
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 20, 2017
   L.T. No.: 14-CA-1963

Dismissed.


text:
    WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, d/b/a as Trustee, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. GREEN TREE SERVICING, LLC, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-0976
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 20, 2017
   L.T. No.: 13-003987-CI

Dismissed.


text:
    Anne Marie PONS, et al., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, etc., et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-0310
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    JUNE 7, 2017
   L.T. NO.: 14-19478

Dismissed.


text:
    Joseph PIRELA, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Don SMITH, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-0805
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    MAY 19, 2017
   L.T. NO.: 10-54535

Dismissed.


text:
    Joseph PIRELA, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Angel MIRANDA, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-0835
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    MAY 19, 2017
   L.T. NO.: 16-410

Dismissed.


text:
    British MOSS, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-0849
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    MAY 19, 2017
   L.T. NO.: 15-27268

Dismissed.


text:
    Joseph PIRELA, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Don SMITH, et. al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-0837
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    MAY 19, 2017
   L.T. NO.: 10-54535

Dismissed.


text:
    Octavio Arnulfo HERNANDEZ, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-1129
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    MAY 19, 2017
   L.T. NO.: 99-26641

Denied.


text:
    Gretten BARZAGA, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Lissette CONTRERAS, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-1006
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    JUNE 08, 2017
   L.T. NO.: 16-16066

Dismissed.


text:
    WILMINGTON TRUST, National Association, etc., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Jaime COSTA, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-1015
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    JUNE 08, 2017
   L.T. NO.: 09-18215

Dismissed.


text:
    Robert M. SILVERSTEIN, et al., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Harvey SAMOWITZ, M.D., et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 3D17-1052
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    JUNE 9, 2017
   L.T. NO.: 16-23982

Dismissed.


text:
    Christian LUDWIGSEN, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Janet NAVARRO, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D16-0968
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    JUNE 09, 2017
   L.T.NO.: 15-22318

Dismissed.


text:
    Lester A. GRUDA, CPA, et al., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Jodi TARTELL, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-0819
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    JUNE 09, 2017
   L.T. NO.: 16-19632

Dismissed.


text:
    Barton HILL, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D16-2208
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    MAY 22, 2017
   L.T. NO.: 12-23951,12-31350

Dismissed.


text:
    George EVLOGIMENOS, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-0405
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    MAY 24, 2017
   L.T.NO.: 13-6912

Dismissed.


text:
    Timothy LOPER, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-0992
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    MAY 24, 2017
   L.T. NO.: 12-14916

Dismissed.


text:
    SEAVAULT PARTNERS, LLC and Homero Meruelo, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. BERMELLO, AJAMIL, & PARTNERS, INC. and Brisas Del Rio, Inc., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-1154
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    MAY 22, 2017
   L.T. NO.: 15-27242

Dismissed.

Denied.


text:
    John Edward SANDERS, Jr., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. In re: ESTATE OF John E. SANDERS, Sr., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D16-2783
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    MAY 22, 2017
   L.T. NO.: 10-2711

Denied.


text:
    Michael A. PIZZI, Jr., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The TOWN OF MIAMI LAKES, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-0596
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    MAY 23, 2017
   L.T. NO.: 15-19303

Denied.


text:
    GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. D.D., a Minor, etc., et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-0748
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    MAY 22, 2017
   L.T. NO.: 12-21496

Dismissed.


text:
    Robert RUPP, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Michelle Raley GIL, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-1001
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    MAY 24, 2017
   L.T. NO.: 99-696

Dismissed.


text:
    Yamilet ORTEGA, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-1028
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    MAY 24, 2017
   L.T. NO.: 11-21487

Dismissed.


text:
    Bidier COLAS, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-1164
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    MAY 24, 2017
   L.T. NO.: 15-14574

Dismissed.


text:
    PHOENIX CONSTRUCTION, INC. and Dominik Swaby, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. SECURED FOUNDATION, INC., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D16-1105
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    MAY 25, 2017
   L.T. NO.: 15-19294

Granted. Remanded.


text:
    AGM DEVELOPMENT II, LLC, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. TOWER EAST INCORPORATED, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D16-1660
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    MAY 25, 2017
   L.T. NO.: 15-15095

Granted and remanded.


text:
    EDUARDO J. GARRIDO D.C. P.A., etc., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. STAR CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 3D16-1696
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    MAY 25, 2017
   L.T. NO.: 09-3898,15-133

Denied.


text:
    Andrew ROLLE, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D16-2344
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    MAY 25, 2017
   L.T. NO.: 08-5454

Denied.


text:
    Rogerio LIMA and Southeast Jet Group, Inc., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Yakov LONDON, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D16-2708
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    MAY 25, 2017
   L.T. NO.: 12-50369

Dismissed.


text:
    Abraham Jackson MPAKA, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Daniel JUNIOR, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-0412
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    MAY 25, 2017
   L.T. NO.: 08-45356, 08-47375

Dismissed.


text:
    Juan CASTILLO, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-0508
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    MAY 25, 2017
   L.T. NO.: 15-11563

Denied.


text:
    Jacques EDWARD, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-0592
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    MAY 25, 2017
   L.T. NO.: 01-32375

Denied.


text:
    Demetrius CALHOUN, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-0721
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    MAY 25, 2017
   L.T. NO.: 10-15422

Granted. Dismissed.


text:
    Dexter A. DAVIS, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-0742
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    MAY 25, 2017
   L.T. NO.: 09-19670

Denied.


text:
    Norma CUEVAS, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. REVERSE MORTGAGE SOLUTIONS, INC., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-0325
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    MAY 25, 2017
   L.T. NO.: 16-8575

Dismissed.


text:
    Glenn COTTON, et al., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Fernand LABELLE, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-0435
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    MAY 25, 2017
   L.T. NO.: 14-2676

Denied.

Denied.

Denied.


text:
    Miguel Angel DOMINGUEZ, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-0441
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    MAY 25, 2017
   L.T. NO.: 16-26963

Dismiss.


text:
    BRAMAN MOTORS, INC., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Nera SUMMERSON, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-0756
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    MAY 25, 2017
   L.T. NO.: 11-11727

Denied.


text:
    FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Christopher SANABRIA and Dawn Sanabria, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-0899
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    MAY 25, 2017
   L.T. NO.: 16-3623

Denied.


text:
    90 CWELT-2008 LLC, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. YACHT CLUB AT PORTOFINO CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-0929
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    MAY 25, 2017
   L.T. NO.: 12-47813

Dismissed.


text:
    Juan GONZALEZ-DIAZ, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-0317
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    MAY 18, 2017
   L.T. NO.: 03-12229

Denied.


text:
    Solomon ROBERTS, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-0421
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    MAY 11, 2017
   L.T. NO.: 78-5774

Denied.


text:
    Sir Michael A. MAPS, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-0809
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    MAY 17, 2017
   L.T. NO.: 15-8755

Denied.


text:
    P.O., the Father, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-0839
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    MAY 18, 2017
   L.T. NO.: 16-16064

Denied.


text:
    Mikel Chanika MIMS, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D 17-0864
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    MAY 18, 2017
   L.T. NO.: 15-29264

Denied.


text:
    Mikel Chanika MIMS, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-0864
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    MAY 11, 2017
   L.T. NO.: 15-29264

Denied.


text:
    Dexter A. DAVIS, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-0865
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    MAY 17, 2017
   L.T. NO.: 09-19670

Denied.


text:
    Dennis J. MCARTHUR, Sr., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Nely JONASSAINT, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-0896
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    MAY 16, 2017
   L.T. NO.: 01-31585

Dismissed.


text:
    Roberto GARCIA, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-0971
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    MAY 11, 2017
   L.T. NO.: 09-31557

Denied.


text:
    Johnny BRADY, Jr., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-0991
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    MAY 16, 2017
   L.T. NO.: 12-15746

Denied.


text:
    Ramon ARTILLES and America Casado, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. FLORIDA PENINSULA INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D16-1200
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    MAY 09, 2017
   L.T. NO.: 14-9444

Dismissed.


text:
    Odalys COMPTE, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Roman COMPTE, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D16-1501
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    MAY 9, 2017
   L.T. NO.: 08-6606

Dismissed.


text:
    Juan GONZALEZ-DIAZ, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-0317
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    APRIL 27, 2017
   L.T. NO.: 03-12229

Denied.


text:
    Elizabeth and Jose PEREZ, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. TOWER HILL SIGNATURE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-0739
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    MAY 10, 2017
   L.T. NO.: 15-8643

Dismissed.


text:
    Sir Michael A. MAPS, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s)
    CASE NO.: 3D17-0809
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    APRIL 28, 2017
   L.T. NO.: 15-8755

Dismissed.


text:
    Jesus Alejandro MARTINEZ and Veronica Reyna-Martinez, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, etc., et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-0813
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    MAY 08, 2017
   L.T. NO.: 12-21658

Dismissed.


text:
    MacKendy STRACHAN, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-1002
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    MAY 08, 2017
   L.T. NO.: 12-17516

Denied.


text:
    Wayne DUNBAR, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-1021
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    MAY 08, 2017
   L.T. NO.: 14-10513

Denied.


text:
    Jeffrey KALLAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D16-1972
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [September 28, 2017]
   Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Lawrence Mirman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 12001089CFCXMX.

Affirmed.


text:
    Jerome ROGOWSKI, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D14-336
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [October 5, 2017]
   Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Lynn Rosenthal, Judge; L.T. Case No. 07007855CF10A.

Affirmed.


text:
    Eddie B. WASHINGTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D14-4587
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    October 5, 2017
   Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial' Circuit, Broward County; Michael A. Robinson, Judge; L.T. Case No. 11016195 CF10A.

Affirmed.


text:
    L.G., a child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D15-0572
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [October 5, 2017]
   Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Elijah H. Williams, Judge; L.T. Case No. 13001815DL00A. .

Affirmed.


text:
    Eric LOUIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D15-2603
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [October 5, 2017]
   Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Michael A. Usan, Judge; L.T. Case No. 06-2012-CF-015725A

Affirmed.


text:
    Jayvon WOOLFORK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D15-3622
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [October 5, 2017]
   Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Lisa M. Porter, Judge; L.T. Case No. 13015306CF10A.

Affirmed.


text:
    Katarius BRANTLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D16-443
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [October 5, 2017]
   Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Geoffrey D. Cohen, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 14000640 CF10A and 14004347 CF10A.

Affirmed.


text:
    Renord JACQUES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D16-608
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [October 5, 2017]
   Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Barry M. Cohen, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502014CF009895A.

Affirmed.


text:
    Kareem BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Nos. 4D16-774
    4D16-775
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    October 5, 2017
   Consolidated appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Lawrence M. Mirman, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 432014CF001488 and 432015CF000120.

Affirmed.


text:
    Anthony WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D16-968

      District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [October 5, 2017]
   Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Andrew L. Siegel, Judge; L.T. Case No. 15-14566 CF10A.

Affirmed.


text:
    C.P., A Child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D16-1325
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    October 5, 2017
   Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Carlos S. Rebollo, Judge; L.T. Case No. 15004520 DLA.

Affirmed.


text:
    Christopher B. FARRELL, Appellant, v. Allyson Manley MCBRIDE and John McBride, Appellees.
    No. 4D16-2307
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [October 5, 2017]
   Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Karen M. Miller, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502015DR009084XXXXNB.

Affirmed.


text:
    Jean Evens JEANCHARLES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D16-2607
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [October 5, 2017]
   Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Samantha Schosberg Feuer, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502012 CF012576A.

Affirmed.


text:
    D.F.C., a child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Nos. 4D16-2789, 4D16-3046, 4D16-3074, 4D16-3075, 4D16-3076, 4D16-3077, 4D16-3079, and 4D16-3080
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [October 5, 2017]
   Consolidated appeals from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Kathlen J. Kroll, Judge; L.T. Case No. 16-CJ-001577-AMB, 16-CJ-001564-AMB, 15-CJ-000237-AMB; 15-CJ-002768-AMB, 16-CJ-001663-AMB, 16-CJ-001565-AMB, 16-CJ-001566-AMB, and 16-CJ-001721-AMB.

Affirmed.


text:
    R.L.T., a child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Nos. 4D16-2884
    4D16-3002
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    October 5, 2017
   Consolidated appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Michael Heisey, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 562015CJ000214A, 562015CJ000288A, 562016CJ000339A, 562016CJ000340A, 562016CJ000373A and 562016CJ000374A.

Affirmed.


text:
    Rodney ST. FLEUR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D16-3226
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    October 5, 2017
   Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Michael A. Robinson, Judge; L.T. Case No. 10001378CF10A.

Affirmed.


text:
    Tony DOUSE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D16-1762
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [October 4, 2017]
   Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Charles Burton, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2014-CF-012651-AXXX-MB.

Affirmed.


text:
    Raymond HANNA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D16-770
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [October 4, 2017]
   Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Dennis D. Bailey, Judge; L.T. Case No. 13-014526-CF10A.

Affirmed in part. Reversed in part. Remanded.


text:
    Jason R. YOUNG, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Nos. 4D16-2953
    4D16-2954
    4D16-2957
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    October 12, 2017
   Consolidated appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Paul L. Backman, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 12-04101CF10A, 12-13043 CF10A, and 12-14531 CF10A.

Affirmed.


text:
    Phillip Wendell PAIGE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Nos. 4D16-1196 and 4D16-1197
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [October 12, 2017]
   Consolidated appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Steven J, Levin, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 15000066CFAXMX and 15000068CFAXMX.

Affirmed.


text:
    Yvon PLAISIR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D16-1683
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [October 12, 2017]
   Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; James W. McCann, Judge; L.T. Case No. 562014CF003716B.

Affirmed.


text:
    Antonio Jermaine PRESLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D15-4678
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    October 12, 2017
   Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Dan L. Vaughn, Judge; L.T. Case No. 562012CF003812A. •

Affirmed.


text:
    Leighton A. LEE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D16-1226
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [October 12, 2017]
   Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Geoffrey D. Cohen, Judge; L.T. Case No. 15002403CF10A.

Affirmed.


text:
    I.M., a child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D16-2198
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    October 12, 2017
   Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; James L. Martz, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2015-CJ-002932-XXXX-MB.

Affirmed.


text:
    Alain ROMAIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D16-2627
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    October 12, 2017
   Appeal from the Circuit Ctfurt for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Dennis D. Bailey, Judge; L.T. Case No. 2012CF7005.

Affirmed.


text:
    Jacob C. JACKSON, Appellant, v. U.S. BANK, N.A., et al., Appellees.
    No. 4D16-2856
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    October 12, 2017
   Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Barry J. Stone, Senior Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE 10021073 (11).

Affirmed.