author: PITTMAN, Judge.

text:
    KENNAMER BROTHERS, INC. v. Ronney STEWART.
    2150359
    Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.
    Sept. 9, 2016
    Certiorari Denied Oct. 14, 2016
    Alabama Supreme Court 1151316.

      J. Lance Smith of Turnbach, Warren, Rice, Lloyd, Frederick & Smith, P.C., Gadsden, for appellant.
    Jacob A. Maples of Richardson Maples, PC, Huntsville, for appellee.
   PITTMAN, Judge.

Kennamer Brothers, Inc. (“the employer”), timely sought appellate review of a judgment entered by the Marshall Circuit Court awarding Ronney Stewart (“the employee”) temporary-total-disability (“TTD”) benefits and medical benefits under the Alabama Workers’ Compensation Act, Ala. Code 1975, § 25-5-1 et seq. (“the Act”), for, among other things, a rotator-cuff tear suffered by the employee that, the trial court determined, had resulted from an accident arising out of and in the course of the employee’s employment. We affirm the trial court’s com-pensability determination but reverse as to its calculation of TTD benefits.

In December 2013, the employee brought a civil action against the employer, alleging that, on October 25, 2012, while the employee was in, the line and scope of his employment as a truck driver, the vehicle he. was. operating overturned and crashed on an interstate highway in Tennessee, causing him to “receive[ ] injuries to his head, neck, back, left arm, legs, and body as a whole.” In June 2015, the employee amended his complaint to add allegations of an injury to his right arm and right shoulder. The employer denied in its answer, as amended, that the employee’s injuries were compensable under the Act. After an ore tenus proceeding, at which the employee testified and the parties submitted evidentiary exhibits, including the transcribed deposition testimony of both lay and expert witnesses, the trial court entered a judgment that, in pertinent part, determined that the employee’s right-shoulder condition (i.e., a rotator-cuff tear) was a compensable injury that had been caused by the October 25, 2012, work-related incident; that the employee was entitled to maximum TTD benefits dating from December 21, 2012 (when the employer had stopped paying TTD benefits to the employee) to January 28, 2014 (when the employee acquired another job); and that those benefits amounted to $771 per week from December 21, 2012, to July 1, 2013, and $788 per week from July 1, 2013, to January 28, 2014.

Our standard of review is - set forth in Ex parte Saad’s Healthcare Services, Inc., 19 So.3d 862 (Ala.2008):

. “ ‘An appellate court reviews the burden of proof applied at trial and other legal issues in workers’ compensation claims without a presumption of correctness.’ However, ‘[i]n reviewing pure findings of fact, the finding of the circuit court shall not be reversed if- that finding is supported by -substantial evidence.’ ‘The trial court’s findings of fact “‘on disputed evidence in a workers’ compensation case are conclusive.’ ” ’ ”

19 So.3d at 870-71 (citations omitted). We also add that, in reviewing factual determinations, an appellate court “must view the facts in the light most favorable to the findings of the trial court.” Ex parte Professional Bus. Owners Ass’n Workers’ Comp. Fund, 867 So.2d 1099, 1102 (Ala.2003).

The employer’s first issue is whether the trial court erred in determining that the employee’s right-shoulder condition was, as a medical matter, caused by his truck crash. In cases involving alleged “accidents,” that is, those involving “a sudden and traumatic event” such as-the employee’s truck crash, “an employee must produce substantial evidence tending to show that the alleged accident occurred and must also establish medical causation by showing that the accident caused or was a contributing cause of the injury.” Pair v. Jack’s Family Rests., Inc., 765 So.2d 678, 681 (Ala.Civ.App.2000) (citing Ex parte Trinity Indus., Inc., 680 So.2d 262, 266 n. 3 (Ala.1996)). “Whether the employment caused an injury is a question of fact to be resolved by the trial court,” Tenax Mfg. Alabama, LLC v. Holt, 979 So.2d 105, 112 (Ala.Civ.App.2007).

The record reflects that the employee, who was 52 years old at the time of trial and has worked almost exclusively as. a truck driver for the past 3 decades, was transported from the scene of the crash on Interstate Highway 24 via helicopter to a hospital in Nashville, Tennessee, where he was diagnosed with a concussion and a scalp laceration requiring the insertion of staples and the removal of foreign bodies; he was discharged from the hospital with instructions that he take oxycodone, a prescription pain medication. Approximately one week after his discharge, he reported joint pain and headaches to personnel at an urgent-care clinic in Boaz, which referred him to a neurosurgeon for further evaluation and treatment; that neurosurgeon also prescribed oxycodone. for the employee’s head wound and referred the employee to a plastic surgeon for further treatment. Over the course of approximately two months, the plastic surgeon treated the employee’s head wound, performing multiple glass-removal' procedures on the wound, prescribing antibiotic medicines to combat infection, and prescribing hydroeodone for pain.

At trial, the employee testified that he had noticed issues with his right shoulder as he came off the pain medication that he had been prescribed. On March 26, 2013, after completing initial treatment for the head wound, the employee returned to the neurologist, reporting lower back pain radiating to his legs, neck pain, and “whole arm pain,” among other symptoms. The neurologist noted that the employee had been taking aspirin with no relief of his pain symptoms. The neurologist assessed the employee’s condition as being “[d]if-fuse upper and lower extremity symptoms with a significant numbness and tingling component,” but, after ordering a magnetic-resonance-imaging (“MRI”) procedure, the neurologist determined that the employee was at maximum medical improvement (“MMI”) with no impairment.

The employee then requested a panel of* four physicians pursuant to Ala. Code 1975, § 25-5-77(a), a portion of the Act pertaining to employer authorization for medical treatment, and selected an ortho? pedic specialist from that panel; during the employee’s first consultation with that orthopedist on August 28, 2013, the employee reported problems with his back, neck, and both arms stemming from the truck crash.' The employee testified at trial that he had informed the orthopedist at that consultation that his right arm had been hurting when he had put on a jacket and had removed a tea container from his refrigerator. After the employee underwent a surgical repair stemming from his head injury and completed several weeks of physical therapy with minimal effect, he returned to the orthopedist, who referred the employee for neurological testing that revealed the employee was suffering from a moderate to severe ulnar entrapment in his left arm. Because blocking injections failed to cause the employee’s condition to improve, the orthopedist referred-the employee to another physician in his practice, who diagnosed the employee with cubital tunnel syndrome and performed a release surgery on the employee’s left arm in December 2013. However, the operating physician noted in his records that the employee’s right shoulder remained an issue.

After the employee had been assessed as having reached MMI as to his head injury and left-arm condition, he underwent a functional-capacity evaluation; however, the evaluator noted that the employee had complained of sharp pain in his right shoulder, and he declined to provide an impairment rating as to the employee’s right shoulder because it had not been fully evaluated. The employee thereafter consulted another orthopedic specialist, Dr. Eric W. Janssen, concerning his right-shoulder pain; Dr. Janssen ordered that the employee undergo an MRI procedure as to his right arm, which revealed a full-thickness tear in his right-shoulder rotator cuff. Dr. Janssen opined at that time that the employee’s rotator cuff required an arthroscopic repair. Dr. Janssen’s deposition testimony was introduced by the employee at trial; in that deposition, he noted on direct questioning from counsel for the employee that the pain symptoms reported by the employee in March 2013 were consistent with both the employee’s self-reported medical history and a rotator-cuff injury, and he testified that, in his professional opinion, the employee’s truck crash caused or contributed to cause the symptoms that the employee was experiencing in his right shoulder.

At Dr. Janssen’s deposition, counsel for the employer asked whether a rotator-cuff tear from a traumatic event would typically be immediately noticeable. He responded by saying that when a patient, typically a younger patient, suffers a rotator-cuff tear via throwing or heavy lifting, it is generally quite painful and that “most times” it would be immediately noticeable. Although Dr. Janssen agreed that it would be unusual for someone suffering such an injury not to report shoulder pain for approximately a year, he also testified that “there’s a lot of variability” as to patient pain complaints. Further, although Dr. Janssen, after having his attention drawn to a chart of the employee’s pain complaints at an August 28, 2013, consultation with another physician that did not indicate right-shoulder pain symptoms, opined that an absence of pain complaints for such a period would tend to show that there was no relationship between the trauma and the right-shoulder condition, the employee’s own trial testimony was to the effect that he had orally reported transient right-shoulder pain to that physician on that date rather than marking it on the chart at check-in. Moreover, on further examination by counsel for the employee, Dr. Jans-sen acknowledged not only that pain from more severely injured areas of the body could “mask” symptoms of a rotator-cuff tear, but also that the medications administered to the employee for those conditions could have alleviated such symptoms, although he testified on further cross-examination that a year’s delay in reporting symptoms would not likely occur even given the employee’s medication history.

Contrary to the employer’s overarching contention, the record in this case does not unequivocally show that the employee did not report any right-shoulder symptoms for approximately a year after the truck crash, although the medical records introduced indicate that the employee’s earliest documented report of potential symptoms in his right shoulder occurred no earlier than five months after the truck crash. However, as we noted in Fab Arc Steel Supply, Inc. v. Dodd, 168 So.3d 1244, 1256 (Ala.Civ.App.2015), symptoms that first appear a few hours, days, or even months after a traumatic event may nonetheless properly be deemed caused by that trauma if no intervening event has occurred and no alternative medical explanation is provided for the appearance of the symptoms. The employer has pointed to no other traumatic event that could have caused the employee’s right-rotator-cuff symptoms (indeed, the employee, denied having experienced any such other traumatic event since the crash), and it offers no other potential causal explanation for the onset of the employee’s symptoms. Given the expert testimony of Dr. Janssen concerning the extent of variability of patient pain complaints in the context of rotator-cuff injuries, as well as his opinion that the crash caused or contributed to cause the employee’s right-shoulder rotator-cuff condition and the employee’s own testimony regarding the onset of symptoms, we cannot conclude that the trial court’s determination of medical causation is not supported by substantial evidence.

The second issue raised by the employer concerns whether the trial court properly determined that the employee’s TTD stemming from the truck crash extended from December 21, 2012, to January 28, 2014. The holding in Fab Arc, supra, recognizes the general rule that TTD benefits are not payable if, before MMI is reached, the injured employee is able to work and earn his preinjury wages, but he or she is prevented from working for reasons unrelated to his or her workplace injury. 168 So.3d at 1259 (citing United States Steel Corp. v. McBrayer, 908 So.2d 947 (Ala.Civ.App.2005)).

The employer points to evidence in the record tending to indicate that, notwithstanding an initial medical release to resume working, the employee’s employment was terminated by the employer on February 4, 2013, when he reported to work but was informed that the employer was not able to secure insurance coverage as to the employee because of his having been involved in automobile crashes. However, assuming the truth of that representation to the employee, the trial court could properly have determined that that reason for terminating the employee’s employment is not unrelated to the injury he sustained— had the employee not been involved in the crash, it could be inferred, he would not have been deemed an impossibly high insurance risk and would have continued performing his previous driving duties for the employer. Further, there was conflicting testimony in the record regarding the reason why the employee was unable to find a replacement driving position after February 4, 2013, but before January 28, 2014; although the employee indicated at his deposition that he had committed a criminal offense approximately 20 years before and that he had been denied work in the past because of his “background,” he testified at trial that the actual reason why he had been unable to secure work had been because he had been unable to obtain medical releases necessary to secure a medical certificate apparently required pursuant to federal motor-carrier regulations. The record also indicates that the employee had been restricted from engaging in the lifting of heavy loads incidental to his driving duties in August 2013 by the orthopedist whom the employee had selected from a panel of four after the neurologist who had initially treated the employee had released him to return to work notwithstanding his remaining physical symptoms. Given the employee’s long-term work history as a truck driver and the absence of evidence that the employee could have secured alternative suitable employment during his recovery period but for the circumstances of his injury, we cannot conclude that the employee did not show “a causal link between his injury and his diminished earning capacity” during the period specified by the trial court. Team Am. of Tennessee v. Stewart, 998 So.2d 483, 487 (Ala.Civ.App.2008).

The final issue raised by the employer concerns whether the TTD award in the judgment is in violation of Ala. Code 1975, § 25-5-68, which specifies in subsection (a) that the maximum compensation payable under the Act is “100 percent of the average weekly wage” of the state as administratively determined by the director of the Alabama Department of Labor as of July 1 of each year but also states in subsection (e) that the “maximum benefits that are in effect on the date of the accident which results in injury or death shall be applicable for the full period during which compensation is payable.” In this case, the trial court awarded the employee TTD benefits of $771 per week from December 21, 2012, to July 1, 2013, which was the average weekly wage in effect at the time of the employee’s accident, but $788 per week from July 1, 2013 .to January 28, 2014, .based upon the director’s determination of the average weekly wage of the state as of July 1, 2013. The employer contends, and the employee concedes, that the increase in. the TTD benefits from July 1, 2013, mandated by the trial court was contrary to § 25-5-68(e). Thus, we reverse that portion of the trial court’s .judgment awarding TTD benefits to the extent that that award violated § 25-5-68(e), and we remand the cause, for the recalculation of those benefits in compliance with the Act based upon the average weekly wage at the time of the incident made the basis of the employee’s claim under, the Act.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

Thompson, P.J., and Thomas, Moore, and Donaldson, JJ., concur.

      . Although the employer filed a mandamus petition on January 26, 2016, which would have been outside the presumptively reasonable time for seeking review of the trial court’s September 16, 2015, ruling via a petition for an extraordinary writ, see Ex parte Troutman Sanders, LLP, 866 So.2d 547, 548-50 (Ala.2003) (holding that motions requesting reconsideration of interlocutory orders do not toll the time for seeking review under Rule 21, Ala. R. App. P.), this court concluded that the judgment presented for review was final and ordered that the petition would instead be treated as an appeal. See generally Ex parte Lowe's Home Ctrs., LLC, 209 So.3d 496, 502 (Ala.Civ.App.2016) (holding that, "if a trial court enters a judgment finding that an injury is compensable, ordering payment for medical treatment, and awarding temporary-total-disability benefits, regardless of whether the amount of those benefits is specified in the judgment, this court will treat such a judgment as final for purposes of appeal”). Because the trial court’s ruling was a final judgment, the employer’s September 30, 2015, motion to alter, amend, or vacate that judgment tolled the time for seeking appellate review until it was denied by operation of law on December 29, 2015 (see Rule 59.1, Ala. R. App. P., and Rule 4(a)(3), Ala. R. App. P.); thus, the employer’s mandamus petition, which we treat as a notice of appeal, timely invoked this court’s appellate jurisdiction (see Rule 4(a)(2), Ala. R. App. P.). We have amended the style to reflect that we are treating this matter as an appeal.

      . The employer does concede that TTD payments are payable from December 13, 2013, to the terminal date specified by the trial court because of the employee’s recovery from his left-arm surgery.


source: Caselaw Access Project

author: THOMAS, Judge.

license: Public Domain

text:
    Maria GRAHAM v. CITY OF TALLADEGA.
    2150803
    Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.
    Oct. 28, 2016

      Steven D. Adcock, Talladega, for appellant. "
    Michael A. O’Brien, Talladega, for appel-lee.
   THOMAS, Judge.

Maria Graham appeals from the order of the Talladega Circuit Court (“the trial court”) dismissing her amended complaint, which she had filed in her action seeking review of the termination of her employment by the City of Talladega (“the city”). Act No. 2004-436, Ala. Acts 2004 (“the local act”), established the civil-service board (“CSB”) for the city. The local act provides the following regarding disciplinary actions against employees of the city:

“Section 10. Disciplinary action. (1) Any member of the classified service shall be removed from-office-or disciplined in any manner only upon notice and hearing, for incompetency, malfeasance, misfeasance, or nonfeasance in office and for conduct detrimental to good order or discipline, including habitual neglect of duty. Any member of the classified service aggrieved by a final decision concerning disciplinary action shall be entitled to a hearing before the [CSB] in accordance with city rules and regulations for the hearings. The rules and regulations shall provide for preliminary procedures for the appropriate appointing authority to hear and decide all cases of disciplinary action involving the subordinate employee of the appointing authority, subsequent to which an aggrieved employee would be entitled to a hearing before the [CSB]. The [CSB] is required to conduct and complete a hearing on an appeal within 30 days of the [CSB’s] receiving notice of the appeal. In the event of a failure to do so, the aggrieved party has the right to appeal to circuit court.
“After a hearing, the [CSB] shall reduce its findings of fact to writing and shall issue a written order upholding or denying the disciplinary action, or ordering less severe disciplinary action. The order shall be binding on the parties.
“(2) Either the city or the member of the classified service subject to the disciplinary action may appeal the order of the [CSB] to the Talladega County Circuit Court within 30 days from the date of the order. Review by the court shall be -without a jury and shall be confined to the record and to a determination of questions of law presented. The order by the circuit court shall be final and conclusive.
“Pending the hearing and order, and pending any appeal to the circuit court, no disciplinary action shall be carried out; provided, however, that pending the hearing and order and an appeal and subject to rules adopted pursuant to this act, the city manager may temporarily suspend any member of the classified service who is removed or suspended for cause, if the city manager deems it in the best interest of the city. Any employee so suspended temporarily pending final disposition of his or her cause shall not lose any pay or seniority relative to any portion of the suspension not upheld on final disposition of the cause.”

The employee-appeal procedure followed by the city further provides:

“The [CSB] shall call a meeting and consider the validity of the appeal pursuant to procedure; and if it is determined by the [CSB] that the appeal has been properly filed, the [CSB] shall hear the employee’s appeal within fourteen (14) calendar days after receipt Of the appeal. The [CSB] shall issue a written decision within seven (7) calendar days of the conclusion of the hearing. The [CSB] is required to conduct'and com-píete a hearing on an appeal within thirty (30) calendar days of the [CSB’s] receiving notice of the appeal. In the event of failure to do so, the aggrieved party has the right to appeal to circuit court.”

Graham was employed by the city. On February 27, 2015, Brian Muenger, the city manager, terminated Graham’s employment with the city on various grounds, including mishandling city funds, filing a false application, and using city property for personal gain. Graham sought review of the decision to terminate her employment under the local act, first from interim city manager Teri St. James and then from the CSB, which received notice of Graham’s appeal on March 30, 2015.

The CSB held a two-day hearing on Graham’s employment-termination challenge on April 20 and April 27, 2015; only four members of the five-member CSB participated. On May 4, 2015, the CSB entered a written order indicating that it was deadlocked, with two members voting to uphold the termination of Graham’s employment and two members voting to reinstate her. On June 3, 2015, Graham timely appealed the decision of the CSB to the trial court. In her original complaint in the trial court, Graham requested that the decision to terminate her employment be overturned and that she be paid backpay from the date of the termination of her employment, which she contended was required by § 10(2) of the local act.

In July 2015, the trial court set Graham’s appeal for a trial to be held on September 8, 2015. However, the trial court entered an order on September 8, 2015, indicating that the trial court had held a status hearing on that date. In that same order, the trial court ordered Graham to make financial arrangements to pay for the transcription of the testimony before the CSB on or before November 16, 2015, or her appeal would be dismissed. Graham made no such arrangements, and the transcription was not made.

On January 4, 2016, Graham filed an amended complaint. In the amended complaint, Graham added a separate count seeking the wages she contended that she should have been paid pending resolution of the appeal of the termination of her employment; she cited the same provision of the local act mentioned in her original complaint. Graham’s amended complaint was not accompanied by a motion seeking leave to amend her complaint. See Rule 15(a), Ala. R. Civ. P. (stating that “a party may amend a pleading [after the 42d day before the first trial setting] only by leave of court, and leave shall be given only upon a showing of good cause” (emphasis added)).

On January 11, 2016, the trial court entered an order dismissing Graham’s original complaint because she had not provided the court with a record of the proceedings before the CSB. In that order, the trial court mentioned that Graham had filed an amended complaint and ordered the city to file a response to that proposed amendment within 30 days. The city responded to Graham’s amended complaint by filing a motion to disallow the amendment. After a hearing, the trial court entered an order on May 16, 2016, dismissing Graham’s amended complaint because, it said, the complaint merely reiterated one of the claims in the original complaint;

Graham appeals from the trial court’s dismissal of her amended complaint. She concedes that the dismissal of her original complaint was proper. However, she contends that the trial court erred by dismissing her amended complaint.

“Although neither party has questioned this court’s appellate jurisdiction, a lack of appellate jurisdiction resulting from a party’s failure to timely file a notice of appeal ‘cannot be waived’; indeed, ‘this court can raise the issue ex mero motu.’ Carter v. Hilliard, 838 So.2d 1062, 1063 (Ala. Civ. App. 2002), and Moragne v. Moragne, 888 So.2d 1280, 1283 (Ala. Civ. App. 2004); see also Rule 2(a)(1), Ala. R. App. P. (stating that an appeal shall be dismissed if the notice of appeal is not timely filed to invoke the jurisdiction of the appellate court).”

Smith v. Smith, 4 So.3d 1178, 1180-81 (Ala. Civ. App. 2008).

As noted above, Graham did not seek leave to file her amended complaint. Rule 15(a) provides, in pertinent part:

“Unless a court has ordered otherwise, a party may amend a pleading without leave of court, but subject to disallowance on the court’s own motion or a motion to strike of an adverse party, at any time more than forty-two (42) days before the first setting of the case for trial, and such amendment shall be freely allowed when justice so requires. Thereafter, a party may amend a pleading only by leave of court, and leave shall be given only upon a showing of good cause. ...”

The trial court had set Graham’s appeal for a trial to be held on September 8, 2015, which, although that trial did not occur, was “the first setting of the case for trial.” Rule 15(a). Thus, Graham was not entitled to amend her complaint “without leave of court.” Rule 15(a). Instead, after July 28, 2015 (42 days before the September 8, 2015, trial setting), she was required to seek leave of court to amend her complaint.

In Image Marketing, Inc. v. Florence Television, L.L.C., 884 So.2d 822, 826 (Ala.2003), our supreme court considered a case in a similar procedural posture. The plaintiff, Image Marketing, Inc. (“IM”), had filed a third amended complaint on October 21, 2002, less than 42 days before the first setting of its action for trial. Image Mktg., 884 So.2d at 823-24. On October 23, 2002, the trial court entered a summary judgment resolving the claims IM had raised in its original, first amended, and second amended complaints. Id. at 824. The defendants moved to strike IM’s third amended complaint because IM. had failed to seek leave of court to file it, and the trial court granted that motion on October 31, 2002. Id. IM appealed the summary judgment on December 6, 2002. Id.

Our supreme court determined that IM’s appeal was untimely. Id. at 827. That determination hinged on the effect of the third amended complaint. IM argued that the claims asserted in the third amended complaint remained pending in the trial court for resolution after the entry of the October 23, 2002, summary judgment, thus rendering that order nonfinal. Id. at 825. However, our supreme court held that IM’s failure to seek leave of court before filing the third amended complaint resulted in the third amended complaint being a nullity. Id. at 826-27. Our supreme court further explained that, if the record reflects that the trial court would have likely granted such leave, had it been requested, the failure to file a motion seeking such leave may be overlooked, rendering the amended pleading operative. Id. at 826. However, the supreme court reasoned, if the record indicates that leave would not have been granted, the amendment remains -a nullity. Id.

Because the record in Image Marketing indicated that the trial court would not have granted leave to amend, our supreme court concluded that the third amended complaint was a nullity. Id. Therefore, our supreme court reasoned, no claims re: mained pending in the trial court once the October 23, 2002, summary judgment was entered and, thus, the summary judgment was a final judgment at'the timé of its entry. W.. Because IM’s notice of appeal was filed 44 days after the entry of the October 23, 2002, summary judgment, IM’s appeal was untimely, and its appeal was dismissed. Id. at 827 (citing, among other things, -Rule 4(a)(1), Ala. R. App. P., which provides that, generally, an" appeal from a circuit-court judgment must be filed within 42' days of the entry of that judgment).

The procedural history in this case is similar to that in Image Marketing. Graham filed an amended complaint in January 2016 without seeking leave of court, which was required under Rule 15(a) because the date of the first setting of Graham’s appeal for trial had passed. Thus, under the rationale expressed in Image Marketing, we must first determine whether the trial court- in the present case would have granted Graham leave ]to amend her complaint, had such leave been requested.

We note that the trial court acknowledged Graham’s amended complaint in its order dismissing the original complaint and directed.the city to respond to that amendment. We do not find the mere acknowledgment of the amended complaint dispositive of the issue whether leave would have been granted to Graham,.if it had been requested. Indeed, the trial court ultimately granted the motion seeking to have the amendment disallowed, indicating that the amendment reiterated a request for relief present in the original complaint. Thus, we conclude that the trial. court would not have granted leave to Graham to amend her complaint in light of its explanation for disallowing it.

Therefore, Graham’s amended complaint was a nullity at the time it was filed. Under the rationale expressed in Image Marketing, the January 11, 2016, judgment dismissing Graham’s original complaint resolved all pending issues before the trial court on that date, and that judgment was a final judgment upoh its entry. Graham had 42 days from the entry of the January 11, 2016, judgment to appeal. Her appeal was filed in June 2016, well beyond the 42-day period for filing an áppeal. See Rule 4(a)(1). “An untimely appeal must be dismissed,” Image Mktg., 884 So.2d at 827 (citing Rule 2(a)(1), Ala. R. App. P.). Accordingly, we dismiss Graham’s appeal.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Thompson, P.J., and Pittman, Moore, and Donaldson, JJ., concur.

      . Because the local act provides that the CSB's failure to complete the hearing on the appeal within 30 days of receiving the appeal gives rise to a right of appeal to the circuit court, and because the procedures governing the appeal to the CSB indicate that a written decision on the appeal must be issued within 7 days of the conclusion of the hearing before the CSB, we conclude, as the parties appear to have, that the time for the CSB to issue a written decision resolving Graham's appeal had expired on May 6, 2015 (March 30, 2015 + 30 days + 7 days), thus giving rise to the right to an appeal to the trial court despite the CSB’s lack of an actual decision on Graham’s appeal.


author: WINDOM, Presiding Judge.

text:
    N.L.O. v. STATE of Alabama.
    CR-15-1020
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    Oct. 21, 2016

      Matthew Green, Fort Payne, for appellant.
    Luther Strange, atty. gen., and Laura I. Cuthbert, asst. atty. gen,, for appellee.
   WINDOM, Presiding Judge.

N.L.O. appeals his juvenile-delinquency adjudication based on the underlying offense of third-degree burglary, a violation of § 13A-7-7, Ala. Code 1975, and his resulting commitment to the Department of Youth Services.

N.L.O.’s adjudication stems from a burglary of Steve Meadows’s apartment on January 19, 2016, during which three rifles and two shotguns were stolen. Angela Box, who lived in an apartment adjacent to Meadows’s apartment, placed the time of the burglary at approximately dusk. Box testified that the burglary had occurred after she left her apartment to go to a grocery store. While Box was walking her dog after returning from the grocery store, she saw that a screen had been removed from a window on the rear of Meadows’s apartment.

Maqey Thompson, who lived with Meadows’s grandson Davey Posey in the apartment on the other side of Box, was cleaning her apartment around 4:30 p.m. when she saw N.L.O. walking on the sidewalk. N.L.O. walked up to Meadows’s porch and sat down. Thompson knew that Meadows was in the hospital and not at his apartment but testified that she gave little thought to N.L.O.’s presence because he was a friend of Meadows’s grandson Austin Posey and a frequent visitor at Meadows’s apartment. Thompson then saw a vehicle arrive and drop off Trey Bowers, who joined N.L.O. on Meadows’s porch. Soon thereafter, N.L.O. and Bowers knocked on Thompson’s front door; she did not answer, though, because she was the only person in her apartment. Thompson did not see the boys leave and did not notice any vehicles returning to Meadows’s apartment, causing her to speculate that the boys walked to the rear of Meadows’s apartment.

Officer Jeremy Bell of the Collinsville Police Department responded to Meadows’s apartment after the burglary had been reported. Officer Bell determined that the point of entry was a bedroom window at the rear of Meadows’s apartment. Officer Bell examined the window but was unable to locate any legible fingerprints. Officer Bell conceded that there had been no reports of two males walking on a public road carrying rifles and shotguns. Officer Bell surmised, though, that it would have been possible to have secreted the weapons in the wooded area that skirted the rear of the apartment complex in which Meadows lived.

Posey testified that N.L.O. was aware that Meadows possessed a number of guns because he had shown them to him on January 18, the day before the burglary. N.L.O. was a suspect from the outset because of Thompson’s seeing him on Meadows’s porch. Posey asked N.L.O. if he had stolen his grandfather’s guns. N.L.O. said that he had not. Soon thereafter, N.L.O. posted a message on Snapchat Stories. The message was a photograph of N.L.O., who was holding a gun over his face, with the following caption: “ ‘Pull up, Posey, if you about that life.’ ” (R. 9.) Posey interpreted the message to be a threat. N.L.O. also posted another photograph that did not specifically reference Posey but did depict N.L.O. holding a gun. The gun or guns depicted in the photographs were not the guns stolen from Meadows.

N.L.O.’s sole claim on appeal is that the evidence was insufficient to sustain his adjudication as a juvenile delinquent on the underlying charge of third-degree burglary.

“A juvenile court may find a child delinquent ‘on proof beyond a reasonable doubt, based upon competent, material, and relevant evidence[] that the child committed the acts by reason of which the child is alleged to be delinquent.’ § 12-15-212(a), Ala. Code 1975. The general standard for assessing the sufficiency of the evidence is applicable to our review of juvenile proceedings. See J.W.B. v. State, 651 So.2d 73, 75 (Ala. Crim. App. 1994) (applying ‘ “[t]he general standard by which we review the evidence” ’ to a juvenile proceeding (quoting Robinette v. State, 531 So.2d 682, 687 (Ala. Crim. App. 1987))).”

J.M.A. v. State, 74 So.3d 487, 492 (Ala. Crim. App. 2011). Regarding the sufficiency of the evidence, this Court has held:

“In deciding whether there is sufficient evidence to support the verdict of the jury and the judgment of the trial court, the evidence must be reviewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution. Cumbo v. State, 368 So.2d 871 (Ala. Cr. App. 1978), cert. denied, 368 So.2d 877 (Ala. 1979). Conflicting evidence presents a jury question not subject to review on appeal, provided the state’s evidence establishes a prima facie case. Gunn v. State, 387 So.2d 280 (Ala. Cr. App.), cert. denied, 387 So.2d 283 (Ala. 1980). The trial court’s denial of a motion for a judgment of acquittal must be reviewed by determining whether there existed legal evidence before the jury, at the time the motion was made, from which the jury by fair inference could have found the appellant guilty. Thomas v. State, 363 So.2d 1020 (Ala. Cr. App. 1978). In applying this standard, the appellate court will determine only if legal evidence was presented from which the jury could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Willis v. State, 447 So.2d 199 (Ala. Cr. App. 1983); Thomas v. State. When the evidence raises questions of fact for the jury and such evidence, if believed, is sufficient to sustain a conviction, the denial of a motion for a judgment of acquittal by the trial court does not constitute error. Young v. State, 283 Ala. 676, 220 So.2d 843 (1969); Willis v. State.”

Breckenridge v. State, 628 So.2d 1012, 1018 (Ala. Crim. App. 1993). Further,

“ ‘Circumstantial evidence alone is enough to support a guilty verdict of the most heinous crime, provided the jury believes beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused is guilty.’ White v. State, 294 Ala. 265, 272, 314 So.2d 857, cert. denied, 423 U.S. 951, 96 S.Ct. 373, 46 L.Ed.2d 288 (1975). ‘Circumstantial evidence is in nowise considered inferior evidence and is entitled to the same weight as direct evidence provided it points to the guilt of the accused.’ Cochran v. State, 500 So.2d 1161, 1177 (Ala. Cr. App. 1984), affirmed in pertinent part, reversed in part on other grounds, Ex parte Cochran, 500 So.2d 1179 (Ala. 1985). ‘It is not necessary for a conviction that the defendant be proved guilty to the “exclusion of every possibility of innocence.” ’ Burks v. State, 117 Ala. 148, 23 So. 530 (1898).”

White v. State, 546 So.2d 1014, 1017 (Ala. Crim. App. 1989).

Even so, “ ‘no rule is more fundamental or better settled than that convictions cannot be predicated upon surmise, speculation, and suspicion to establish the accused’s criminal agency in the offense charged.’” Mullins v. City of Dothan, 724 So.2d 83, 86 (Ala. Crim. App. 1998) (quoting Benefield v. State, 286 Ala. 722, 724, 246 So.2d 483, 485 (1971)). “ ‘ “A defendant should not be convicted on mere suspicion or out of fear that he might have committed the crime.” ’ ” Ex parte Parker, 136 So.3d 1092, 1095 (Ala. 2013) (quoting Ex parte Williams, 468 So.2d 99, 101 (Ala. 1986), quoting in turn Thomas v. State, 363 So.2d 1020, 1022 (Ala. Crim. App. 1978)).

“A person commits the crime of burglary in the third degree- if [he] khowingly enters or remains unlawfully in a dwelling with the intent to commit a crime therein.” § 13A-7-7(a)(1), Ala. Code 1976. N.L.O. argues that the State failed to prove that he entered or remained in Meadows’s apartment or that he had the intent to commit a crime therein. This Court agrees.

There is no dispute that a burglary occurred at Meadows’s apartment. N.L.O.’s only apparent connection to the burglary, however, is that he and Bowers were seen on Meadows’s porch near the alleged time of the. burglary. But the “mere presence of a person at the time and place of a crime is not sufficient to justify his conviction for the commission of the crime.” Lollar v. State, 398 So.2d 400, 402 (Ala. Crim. App. 1981) (citing Thomas v. State, 363 So.2d 1020 (Ala. Crim. App. 1978), and Kimmons v. State, 343 So.2d 542 (Ala. Crim. App. 1977)).

The State argues in its brief on appeal that because neither Meadows nor Posey were at the apartment, N.L.O. should not have been on Meadows’s porch. Such behavior, though, is entirely consistent with N.L.O.’s waiting on someone to arrive at an apartment he visited frequently. The State notes that N.L.O. had been banned from the apartment complex, but this fact is of little significance. According to Officer Bell, N.L.O. had been banned by the complex manager for an unrelated domestic dispute with a female resident. Nonetheless, the record indicates that N.L.O. was still welcomed as a , guest at Meadows’s apartment—Box. testified that N.L.O. was with Posey at Meadows’s apartment on the evening before the burglary. The State also cites N.L.O.’s Snapchat messages as consciousness of guilt. Although the messages may have been threats directed at Posey, the messages could be interpreted as N.L.O.’s being angry with Posey as a result of Posey’s -implicitly accusing him of burglary. •

. The State’s theory of the case was that N.L.O. and Bowers knew no one was at Meadows’s apartment and that N.L.O. knocked on Thompson’s door to confirm that no one was in her apartment. N.L.O. and Bowers then went to the rear of Meadows’s apartment, removed a window screen, entered through that window, took Meadows’s rifles and shotguns, and fled through a nearby wooded area. Although a finder of fact is permitted to make reasonable inferences from the evidence, the State’s theory is based almost entirely on “ ‘surmise, speculation, and suspicion.’ ” Mullins, 724 So.2d at 86 (quoting Benefield, 286 Ala. at 724, 246 So.2d at 485). Even the testimony placing N.L.O. and Bowers at the rear of Meadows’s apartment is speculative—Thompson testified that she saw N.L.O. and Bowers arrive and that “they had to have- [walked] around back” because “a couple of hours passed,” “[t]here [were] no cars that came up,” and she “never [saw] one Of the boys leave.” (R. 44.) The assumption that N.L.O. and Bowers walked to the rear of Meadows’s apartment because Thompson did not see them leave is unreasonable, especially in light of Thompson’s testimony that she was cleaning her living room and that she “didn’t think nothing about” N.L.O.’s and Bower’s presence on Meadows’s porch. (R. 43, 44.)

Even when the evidence is viewed in a light most favorable to the State, the State failed to present any evidence, direct or circumstantial, indicating that N.L.O. entered Meadows’s apartment or that he intended to commit the crime- of theft therein. Therefore, the evidence is insufficient to sustain N.L.O.’s adjudication as a delinquent.

Accordingly, the adjudication of delinquency by the juvenile court is reversed, and a judgment is rendered in N.L.O.’s favor.

REVERSED AND JUDGMENT RENDERED.

Welch, Burke, and Joiner, JJ., concur. Kellura, J., not sitting.

      . "Snapchat is a smartphone application that allows users to send pictures and videos (not to exceed 10 seconds in length) to friends or followers. Unlike other social media applications, videos uploaded to Snapchat stories disappear after 24 hours.” In re M.H., 205 Cal.Rptr.3d 1, 4, 1 Cal.App.5th 699 (Cal. Ct. App. 2016).


text:
    DISTRICT COURTS OF APPEAL
    Acosta-Guzman v. State
    1D16-0934
    02/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct, (Duval)


text:
    Akel v. State
    1D16-4003
    01/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Okaloosa)


text:
    Akel v. State
    1D15-3575
    01/09/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Clay)


text:
    Alford v. State
    1D16-1020
    01/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Calhoun)


text:
    Allen v. State
    1D15-3800
    01/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hamilton)


text:
    Allotey v. State
    1D16-3643
    01/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir, Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Alston v. Warden
    1D16-2316
    01/23/2017
   Aff.

Cir, Ct. (Leon)


text:
    Anderson v. State
    1D16-3264
    01/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Alachua)


text:
    Andrews v. State
    1D16-3823
    01/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Aspen American Insurance Company v. City of Gainesville
    1D16-3705
    01/13/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Alachua)


text:
    Ayers v. State
    1D16-3608
    01/19/2017
   Proh.den.


text:
    Baker v. Bondi
    1D16-4785
    01/11/2017
   Dism.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Ball v. Kessler
    1D16-4731
    01/11/2017
   Proh.den.


text:
    Ball v. State
    1D16-3665
    01/26/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Columbia)


text:
    Ball v. State
    1D16-3664
    01/26/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Columbia)


text:
    Barley v. State
    1D16-4034
    01/09/2017
   Dism.

Cir. Ct. (Leon)


text:
    Barnes v. Florida
    1D16-3672
    01/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Clay)


text:
    Barnes v. State
    1D16-3670
    01/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Clay)


text:
    Barnett v. State
    1D16-2185
    01/13/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bay)


text:
    Barrington v. State Attorney
    1D16-4234
    01/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Jefferson)


text:
    Bartholomew v. State
    1D16-2319
    01/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Alachua)


text:
    Bass v. State
    1D15-4149
    01/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Leon)


text:
    Bass v. State
    1D15-4147
    01/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Leon)


text:
    Bass v. State
    1D15-4124
    01/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Leon)


text:
    Bell v. State
    1D16-2868
    01/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Washington)


text:
    Bentley v. State
    1D16-2979
    01/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Okaloosa)


text:
    Berrios v. State
    1D16-1405
    01/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Escambia)


text:
    Bigham v. State
    1D16-3710
    01/03/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Bilal v. State
    1D16-1407
    01/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Escambia)


text:
    Bishop v. Leibowitz
    1D16-0956
    01/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Bitar v. State, Department of Revenue
    1D16-4853
    01/09/2017
   Dism.

Dept. of Revenue


text:
    Black v. State
    1D15-1657
    01/13/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Escambia)


text:
    Bluntson v. State
    1D16-3873
    01/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Escambia)


text:
    Bond v. Florida Commission on Offender Review
    1D16-5503
    01/09/2017
   Dism.

Cir. Ct. (Walton)


text:
    Boykin v. State
    1D15-5688
    01/26/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Bradley v. Fort Walton Beach Medical Center, Inc.
    1D16-5520
    01/11/2017
   Proh.den.


text:
    Bradley v. State
    1D16-0576
    01/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Okaloosa)


text:
    Branch v. State
    1D16-4825
    01/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Jefferson)


text:
    Brannon v. State
    1D16-3926
    01/09/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Columbia)


text:
    Brewington v. State
    1D16-1402
    01/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Escambia)


text:
    Bright v. State
    1D16-5636
    01/11/2017
   Pet. den.


text:
    Brooks v. State
    1D16-3632
    01/19/2017
   Mand.den.


text:
    Brooks v. State
    1D16-2906
    01/19/2017
   Mand.den.


text:
    Brown v. State
    1D15-4869
    01/09/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Gadsden)


text:
    Brown v. State
    1D15-3955
    01/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Brown v. State
    1D16-3553
    01/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Brown v. State
    1D16-1275
    01/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Brown v. State
    1D15-1884
    02/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Leon)


text:
    Butler v. State
    1D16-5228
    01/19/2017
   Proh.den.


text:
    Buttery v. Monahan
    1D15-4173
    01/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Clay)


text:
    C.M. v. Department of Children and Families
    1D16-4711
    01/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Alachua)


text:
    C.S. v. Department of Children and Families
    1D16-4351
    01/26/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Clay)


text:
    Cage v. Employee Staff, LLC
    1D16-3204
    01/31/2017
   Aff.

Judge of Comp. Claims


text:
    Caine v. State
    1D16-3822
    01/09/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Escambia)


text:
    Calhoun Cash LLC v. Wilcox
    1D16-3800
    01/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Alachua)


text:
    Campbell v. State
    1D16-3699
    01/13/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Leon)


text:
    Carter v. State
    1D16-4997
    01/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Okaloosa)


text:
    Casey v. State
    1D16-2510
    02/08/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Cashmore v. State
    1D15-4443
    01/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Dixie)


text:
    Caswell v. Florida Department of Corrections
    1D16-2737
    01/25/2017
   Cert. den.


text:
    Chambers v. State
    1D16-805
    01/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Calhoun)


text:
    Charles v. State
    1D15-2452
    01/03/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Leon)


text:
    Chase v. State
    1D16-0703
    01/25/2017
   Belated App. den.


text:
    Clanton v. State
    1D16-5202
    01/19/2017
   Proh.den.


text:
    Clanton v. State
    1D16-5538
    01/25/2017
   Pet. den.


text:
    Clark v. State
    1D16-1254
    01/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Cloys v. Cloys
    1D15-5395
    01/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Coleman v. State
    1D16-3292
    01/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Collins v. State
    1D16-2052
    01/09/2017
   Cert.dism.


text:
    Colonel v. Florida Commission on Offender Review
    1D16-1026
    01/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Leon)


text:
    Conklin-Peters v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
    1D16-336
    01/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Levy)


text:
    Cook v. State
    1D16-3839
    01/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Escambia)


text:
    Cooler v. State
    1D16-1579
    01/03/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Santa Rosa)


text:
    Copeland v. Jones
    1D16-5422
    01/23/2017
   Hab.Corp.dism.


text:
    Cox v. State
    1D16-2668
    01/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Gadsden)


text:
    Crawford v. State
    1D16-3561
    01/09/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Crystalus v. State
    1D16-3767
    01/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Cummings v. State
    1D15-5449
    01/09/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Curry v. State
    1D16-3970
    01/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    D'Amico v. Jones
    1D16-5604
    01/19/2017
   Hab.Corp.dism.


text:
    Davis v. State
    1D16-5521
    01/11/2017
   Belated App. den.


text:
    Davis v. State
    1D16-3927
    01/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Davison v. State
    1D16-2926
    01/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Escambia)


text:
    Dejuan v. State
    1D16-5155
    01/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Taylor)


text:
    Dennis v. State
    1D15-4547
    01/09/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Leon)


text:
    Dennis v. State
    1D16-1810
    01/19/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Department of Management Services v. Smith
    1D16-3472
    01/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Leon)


text:
    Depinto v. Holdnak
    1D16-5160
    01/09/2017
   Dism.

Cir. Ct. (Bay)


text:
    DePinto v. Boshelle
    1D16-5162
    01/09/2017
   Dism.

Cir. Ct. (Bay)


text:
    Dotson v. State
    1D16-2348
    01/19/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Escambia)


text:
    Doyle v. Florida Commission on Offender Review
    1D16-0384
    01/19/2017
   Cert.den.


text:
    Duncan v. State
    1D16-4079
    01/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Alachua)


text:
    Dunn v. State
    1D16-3787
    01/03/2017
   Aff,

Cir. Ct. (Escambia)


text:
    Durham v. State
    1D16-5253
    01/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Okaloosa)


text:
    Edwards v. State
    1D16-4697
    01/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Columbia)


text:
    Eure v. State
    1D16-3728
    01/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Alachua)


text:
    Evergreen Tree Service, Inc v. Clay Electric Cooperative, Inc.
    1D16-1364
    01/23/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Clay)


text:
    Ewing v. State
    1D16-5723
    01/11/2017
   Pet.dism.


text:
    Felten v. State
    1D16-4892
    01/19/2017
   Proh.den.


text:
    Ferguson v. State
    1D15-5258
    01/09/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Leon)


text:
    First Choice Commercial Janitorial Services of Florida, Inc. v. Hood
    1D16-1333
    01/20/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bay)


text:
    Florence-Darby v. State
    1D16-5623
    01/11/2017
   Pet. den.


text:
    Floyd v. State
    1D16-2603
    04/10/2017
   Pet.den.


text:
    Fowler v. State
    1D16-2303
    01/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Okaloosa)


text:
    Franck v. Chitwood
    1D16-1231
    01/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bay)


text:
    Fugnole v. State
    1D16-5734
    01/23/2017
   Dism.

Cir. Ct. (Alachua)


text:
    Gibbs v. State
    1D16-4039
    01/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Nassau)


text:
    Golden v. State
    1D16-3002
    01/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Golden v. State
    1D16-3003
    01/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Goodman v. State
    1D16-5010
    01/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Columbia)


text:
    Graham v. State
    1D16-2706
    01/23/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Alachua)


text:
    Graham v. Trenton Apartments, Ltd.
    1D16-3000
    01/03/2017
   Cert.den.


text:
    Gray v. State
    1D16-3766
    01/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Columbia)


text:
    Green v. State
    1D16-3680
    01/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Green v. State
    1D16-3319
    01/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Griffin v. State
    1D15-4895
    01/30/2017
   Cert.den.


text:
    Hall v. State
    1D16-3715
    01/03/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Madison)


text:
    Handforth v. Stenotype Institute of Jacksonville, Inc.
    1D16-1894
    01/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Harkins v. State
    1D16-3355
    01/30/2017
   Cert.den.


text:
    Harmon v. State
    1D16-4370
    01/13/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bay)


text:
    Harris v. State
    1D16-737
    01/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Escambia)


text:
    Hayes v. State
    1D16-3439
    01/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Hobbs v. State
    1D16-3818
    01/09/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Hodges v. State
    1D16-3443
    01/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Santa Rosa)


text:
    Holt v. State
    1D15-1446
    01/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Horne v. State
    1D16-4442
    02/01/2017
   Belated App. den.


text:
    Howard v. State
    1D16-2379
    01/19/2017
   Pet.den.


text:
    Hughes v. State
    1D15-3770
    01/09/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Ingram v. State
    1D16-3209
    01/09/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Okaloosa)


text:
    J. L. H. v. Florida Department of Children and Families
    1D16-2169
    02/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Escambia)


text:
    Jackson v. State
    1D16-3599
    01/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bay)


text:
    Jackson v. State
    1D16-1527
    01/23/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Jenkins v. State
    1D16-5096
    01/25/2017
   Belated App. den.


text:
    Jerkins v. State
    1D16-3412
    01/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Columbia)


text:
    Jewson v. State
    1D16-2017
    01/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Santa Rosa)


text:
    Johns v. State
    1D16-4682
    01/23/2017
   Belated App. den.


text:
    Johnson v. Jones
    1D16-2332
    01/09/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Jackson)


text:
    Johnson v. State
    1D16-5664
    01/11/2017
   Pet.den.


text:
    Johnson v. State
    1D16-0720
    01/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Leon)


text:
    Johnson v. State
    1D16-4308
    01/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Alachua)


text:
    Johnson v. State
    1D16-5138
    01/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Alachua)


text:
    Jones v. Jones
    1D16-1382
    01/19/2017
   Cert.den.


text:
    Jones v. State
    1D16-2393
    01/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Jones v. State
    1D16-1746
    02/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Joyner v. State
    1D16-5216
    01/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Escambia)


text:
    Kalivoda v. State
    1D16-1497
    01/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Okaloosa)


text:
    Kaufman v. State
    1D16-3733
    01/03/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Calhoun)


text:
    Keener v. Synovus Bank
    1D16-1474
    01/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Gulf)


text:
    Kelly v. State
    1D16-3225
    01/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Okaloosa)


text:
    Kemp v. State
    1D16-2101
    01/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Calhoun)


text:
    King v. State
    1D16-2923
    01/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Escambia)


text:
    King v. State
    1D16-4998
    01/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Okaloosa)


text:
    King v. State
    1D16-4393
    02/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Kittrell v. State
    1D16-4281
    02/08/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Escambia)


text:
    Knight v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
    1D16-3855
    01/03/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Leon)


text:
    Kozik v. Kozik
    1D16-4954
    01/23/2017
   Proh.den.


text:
    Kresler v. Florida Department of Corrections
    1D16-2987
    01/09/2017
   Cert.den.


text:
    Krieger v. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
    1D15-5599
    01/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Leon)


text:
    Lambert v. North Florida Tower Service, Inc.
    1D15-2482
    01/20/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Columbia)


text:
    Lambert v. North Florida Tower Service, Inc.
    1D15-2481
    01/20/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Columbia)


text:
    Lauramore v. State
    1D16-2221
    01/23/2017
   Pet.den.


text:
    Lee v. State
    1D15-5431
    01/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Levitan v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
    1D16-3004
    01/19/2017
   Dism.

Cir. Ct. (Escambia)


text:
    Liberty Estates, Inc. v. Cadence Bank
    1D16-3794
    01/23/2017
   Proh.den.


text:
    Liberty Estates, Inc. v. Cadence Bank
    1D16-0501
    01/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Liberty)


text:
    Liberty Estates, Inc. v. Cadence Bank
    1D15-5667
    01/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Liberty)


text:
    Littles v. State
    1D16-3378
    01/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Alachua)


text:
    Manning v. State
    1D16-1240
    01/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Marshall v. State
    1D15-5854
    01/20/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bay)


text:
    Martin v. State
    1D16-2330
    01/11/2017
   Pet.den.


text:
    Martin v. State
    1D16-3184
    01/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Mason v. State
    1D16-3814
    01/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Okaloosa)


text:
    Matheny v. State
    1D16-4956
    01/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Escambia)


text:
    Mathis v. State
    1D16-5142
    01/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Gadsden)


text:
    Mauk v. State
    1D16-2764
    01/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    May v. State
    1D16-2629
    01/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bay)


text:
    McClain v. State
    1D16-2164
    01/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Okaloosa)


text:
    McCray v. State
    1D16-5645
    01/09/2017
   Dism.

Cir. Ct. (Gadsden)


text:
    McCray v. State
    1D17-0061
    01/19/2017
   Hab.Corp.den.


text:
    McKinzey v. Warden
    1D16-4090
    01/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Leon)


text:
    McLemore v. State
    1D16-3511
    01/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Escambia)


text:
    McVay v. State
    1D16-2632
    01/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Okaloosa)


text:
    Mency v. State
    1D16-3022
    02/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Mendoza v. State
    1D16-3928
    01/13/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Mims v. State
    1D16-3637
    01/09/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Escambia)


text:
    Mintz v. State
    1D16-3602
    01/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Alachua)


text:
    Mitchell v. State
    1D16-655
    01/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Union)


text:
    Mizak v. State
    1D16-4016
    01/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Okaloosa)


text:
    Moorer v. State
    1D16-3339
    01/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Escambia)


text:
    Morrison v. State
    1D16-3035
    01/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Walton)


text:
    Moses v. State
    1D16-3658
    01/13/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Okaloosa)


text:
    Moton v. Florida Commission on Offender Review
    1D16-4614
    02/01/2017
   Mand.den.


text:
    Moultrie v. State
    1D15-3810
    01/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Escambia)


text:
    MKL Enterprises LLC v. Florida Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co.
    1D16-3792
    01/13/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Clay)


text:
    Neal v. Weinstock
    1D16-5703
    01/25/2017
   Mand.den.


text:
    Nelson v. State
    1D16-4305
    01/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Nodine v. State
    1D16-3872
    01/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Alachua)


text:
    O'Brien v. State
    1D16-5628
    01/11/2017
   Pet.den.


text:
    O'Neal v. State
    1D16-4120
    01/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Santa Rosa)


text:
    O’Quinn v. State
    1D16-3507
    01/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Okaloosa)


text:
    Ocasio v. State
    1D16-3351
    01/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Levy)


text:
    Ortiz v. State
    1D16-548
    01/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Levy)


text:
    Osborn v. State
    1D16-4413
    01/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bay)


text:
    Padowitz v. State
    1D16-2942
    01/09/2017
   Hab.Corp.den.


text:
    Paige v. State
    1D16-3967
    01/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Escambia)


text:
    Pamphile v. State
    1D16-3359
    01/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Leon)


text:
    Parker v. State
    1D16-4062
    01/13/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Okaloosa)


text:
    Parnell v. Anderson
    1D16-3048
    02/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hamilton)


text:
    Patterson v. State
    1D15-5865
    01/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Petrie v. Scott
    1D15-5573
    01/20/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Levy)


text:
    Pham v. State
    1D16-4119
    01/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Walton)


text:
    Pham v. State
    1D16-3786
    01/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Walton)


text:
    Phillips v. State
    1D14-5558
    01/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Madison)


text:
    Ponder v. Jones
    1D15-5199
    01/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Gulf)


text:
    Powell v. State
    1D16-2980
    01/03/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Okaloosa)


text:
    Prado v. State
    1D16-3600
    01/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Prater v. State
    1D16-3505
    01/23/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Clay)


text:
    Prater v. State
    1D16-3504
    01/23/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Clay)


text:
    Prater v. State
    1D16-3503
    01/23/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Clay)


text:
    Prater v. State
    1D16-3502
    01/23/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Clay)


text:
    Pugh v. Pugh
    1D15-4932
    01/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Pugh v. State
    1D16-3261
    01/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Alachua)


text:
    Purifoy v. State
    1D16-3877
    01/09/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Escambia)


text:
    Quesnel v. State
    1D16-3562
    01/23/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    R. M. K. v. Florida Department of Children and Families
    1D16-3193
    01/20/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Clay)


text:
    R.E.C. v. Department of Children and Families
    1D16-4158
    01/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Escambia)


text:
    Randolph v. Gibbs
    1D15-4843
    01/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Randolph v. Gibbs
    1D15-4572
    01/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Randolph v. Gibbs
    1D15-4218
    01/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Randolph v. Gibbs
    1D15-2466
    01/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Randolph v. State
    1D16-3993
    01/13/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Ratcliffe v. State
    1D15-1031
    01/09/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Suwannee)


text:
    Ray v. State
    1D16-4058
    01/13/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Walton)


text:
    Reed v. State
    1D16-3489
    01/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Reeder v. State
    1D16-0705
    01/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Rehman v. Rehman
    1D16-2167
    01/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Clay)


text:
    Reilly v. State
    1D15-3302
    01/09/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Leon)


text:
    Reilly v. State
    1D15-3252
    01/09/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Leon)


text:
    Richards v. State
    1D16-3597
    01/19/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Richardson v. State
    1D17-0199
    02/01/2017
   Pet.den.


text:
    Ritch v. Florida Department of Corrections
    1D16-2007
    01/19/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Leon)


text:
    Rivera v. State
    1D16-5079
    01/11/2017
   Proh.den.


text:
    Roberts v. State
    1D16-4396
    02/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Robinson v. State
    1D16-4594
    01/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Jackson)


text:
    Rolle v. State
    1D16-5226
    01/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Escambia)


text:
    Rollins v. State
    1D16-5625
    01/31/2017
   Dism.

Cir. Ct. (Leon)


text:
    Rowe v. Rowe
    1D16-2207
    01/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Rupp v. State
    1D16-3796
    01/13/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Russell v. State
    1D16-2955
    01/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Lafayette)


text:
    Russell v. State
    1D16-3824
    01/26/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Taylor)


text:
    Schofield v. State
    1D16-4036
    01/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Holmes)


text:
    Schwartz v. Federal National Mortgage Association
    1D16-0946
    01/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Alachua)


text:
    Scott v. State
    1D16-2963
    01/20/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Escambia)


text:
    Sears v. State
    1D16-2718
    01/20/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Escambia)


text:
    Seelhorst v. State
    1D16-3648
    01/11/2017
   Belated App. den.


text:
    Shamburger v. State
    1D16-3691
    01/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Leon)


text:
    Sheehan v. Florida Department of Corrections
    1D16-3235
    01/25/2017
   Cert.den.


text:
    Shelton v. State
    1D16-2948
    02/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Simpkins v. State
    1D16-151
    01/19/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Santa Rosa)


text:
    Sims v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
    1D16-4898
    01/19/2017
   Dism.

Cir. Ct. (Bay)


text:
    Slater v. State
    1D16-5122
    05/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Suwannee)


text:
    Smedley v. State
    1D16-2112
    01/13/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Okaloosa)


text:
    Smith v. State
    1D16-3807
    01/03/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Santa Rosa)


text:
    Smith v. State
    1D16-3617
    01/30/2017
   Dism.

Cir. Ct. (Suwannee)


text:
    Smith v. State
    1D16-5050
    01/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Escambia)


text:
    Spivey v. State
    1D16-2911
    01/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Stephens v. State
    1D16-3623
    01/13/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Stewart v. State
    1D16-3519
    01/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Escambia)


text:
    Stills v. State
    1D17-0209
    02/01/2017
   Pet.den.


text:
    Stoe v. State
    1D16-3838
    01/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Jackson)


text:
    SCF, Inc. v. State
    1D16-1779
    01/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Leon)


text:
    T.S. v. State
    1D16-2074
    02/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Levy)


text:
    T.W. v. Florida Department of Children and Families
    1D16-1598
    01/09/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Santa Rosa)


text:
    Taylor v. State
    1D16-3331
    01/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Tejera v. Daley
    1D16-3217
    01/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Leon)


text:
    Thach v. State
    1D16-3123
    01/09/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Escambia)


text:
    Thomas v. State
    1D16-2872
    01/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Leon)


text:
    Thomas v. State
    1D16-3476
    01/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Thomas v. State
    1D16-1999
    02/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Thornton v. State
    1D16-4268
    01/03/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Walton)


text:
    Tillman v. State
    1D16-3563
    01/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Tillman v. Suntrust Mortgage, Inc.
    1D15-5030
    02/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Alachua)


text:
    Tolbert v. State
    1D16-1278
    01/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Tolbert v. State
    1D16-1277
    01/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Trimuar v. State
    1D16-5218
    01/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Escambia)


text:
    Turner v. State
    1D16-3902
    01/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Santa Rosa)


text:
    Tyson v. School Board of Levy County
    1D15-5369
    01/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Levy)


text:
    Verma v. State
    1D16-4864
    01/25/2017
   Proh.dism.


text:
    Villages Miami Phase II, Ltd. v. Florida Housing Finance Corporation
    1D16-3234
    01/30/2017
   Aff.

Housing Finance Corporation


text:
    Voshell v. State
    1D16-3558
    01/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Wakefield v. State
    1D16-2509
    01/09/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Walker v. State
    1D16-2519
    01/19/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Leon)


text:
    Wallace v. State
    1D16-1517
    01/04/2017
   Pet.den.


text:
    Walsh v. Florida Commission on Offender Review
    1D16-1850
    01/11/2017
   Cert.den.


text:
    Waters v. State
    1D16-2179
    01/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Baker)


text:
    Webb v. State
    1D16-0008
    01/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Santa Rosa)


text:
    Webb v. State
    1D16-3976
    01/12/2017
   Belated App. den.


text:
    Weber v. State
    1D15-5236
    01/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    White v. State
    1D16-2749
    01/20/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Santa Rosa)


text:
    Willoughby v. State
    1D16-2977
    01/09/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bay)


text:
    Wilridge v. State
    1D16-3449
    01/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Wilson v. State
    1D16-3671
    01/13/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Leon)


text:
    Wilson v. State
    1D16-2056
    01/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Jefferson)


text:
    Woods v. State
    1D16-3765
    01/03/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Woolf v. Woolf
    1D16-2700
    01/23/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Walton)


text:
    Wright v. State
    1D16-3921
    01/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Duval)


text:
    Wright v. State
    1D17-0265
    02/01/2017
   Hab.Corp.dism.


text:
    Wyche v. State
    1D16-3843
    01/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Leon)


text:
    Wyche v. State
    1D16-3848
    01/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Leon)


text:
    Wyche v. State
    1D16-3846
    01/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Leon)


text:
    Wyche v. State
    1D16-3845
    01/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Leon)


text:
    Armas ex rel. H.A. v. Armas
    2D16-2423
    01/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pasco)


text:
    Armas v. Armas
    2D16-2489
    01/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pasco)


text:
    Armstrong v. State
    2D16-2597
    01/13/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Aro v. State
    2D15-5223
    01/13/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Collier)


text:
    Barnes v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission
    2D15-4342
    01/25/2017
   Aff.

Reemployment Assistance Apps. Com’n


text:
    Baxter v. State
    2D16-3103
    02/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pinellas)


text:
    Brown v. State
    2D16-1159
    01/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Manatee)


text:
    Carrazana v. State
    2D16-2864
    01/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (DeSoto)


text:
    Clarke v. State
    2D16-910
    01/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Cohen v. Cohen
    2D16-3756
    01/25/2017
   Cert.den.

Cir. Ct. (Sarasota)


text:
    Cooper v. State
    2D16-2421
    01/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Polk)


text:
    Corson v. State
    2D16-1143
    01/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pinellas)


text:
    Craft v. State
    2D16-5401
    01/10/2017
   Hab.Corp.den.


text:
    Crawford v. Philip Morris USA Inc.
    2D16-2956
    02/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Cullins v. State
    2D16-2123
    01/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    CCP Fishhawk, LLC v. Fulcher
    2D15-4686
    01/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Dixson v. State
    2D16-2993
    02/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pinellas)


text:
    Douse v. Hillsborough County Regional Transit Authority
    2D16-1177
    01/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Dupree v. State
    2D16-3078
    02/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pinellas)


text:
    Garcia v. State
    2D16-2745
    01/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Polk)


text:
    Gillespie v. State
    2D15-5343
    01/13/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Charlotte)


text:
    Gloster v. State
    2D16-2918
    01/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Lee)


text:
    Harper v. State
    2D16-2581
    01/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pinellas)


text:
    Hill v. State
    2D16-3468
    01/26/2017
   Proh.den.


text:
    Horton v. State
    2D16-2814
    01/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    In re Estate of Sanders
    2D16-385
    01/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Lee)


text:
    In Interest of A.M.
    2D16-4923
    01/11/2017
   Den.

Cir. Ct. (Collier)


text:
    In Interest of A.M.
    2D16-3219
    01/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pinellas)


text:
    In Interest of A.Z.
    2D16-3100
    01/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Polk)


text:
    In Interest of C.B.
    2D16-3132
    01/04/2017
   Dism.

Cir. Ct. (Lee)


text:
    In Interest of D.B.
    2D16-1996
    01/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pasco)


text:
    In Interest of E.S.O.
    2D16-4133
    01/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Polk)


text:
    In Interest of K.A.
    2D16-3751
    01/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    In Interest of M.R.
    2D16-3196
    01/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    In Interest of N.W.
    2D16-3085
    01/27/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Jackson v. State
    2D16-1278
    01/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pinellas)


text:
    Jackson v. State
    2D16-2963
    01/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Polk)


text:
    Jenkins v. State
    2D16-3087
    02/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Charlotte)


text:
    Johnson v. State
    2D16-2810
    01/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Polk)


text:
    Kalina v. State
    2D16-2912
    01/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pinellas)


text:
    Landsberg v. Mumford
    2D16-672
    01/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Charlotte)


text:
    Langman v. State
    2D16-1827
    01/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Highlands)


text:
    Laraby v. State
    2D16-2395
    01/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Polk)


text:
    Lincoln v. U.S. Bank National Association
    2D16-214
    01/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pinellas)


text:
    Lord v. State
    2D16-2928
    01/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pinellas)


text:
    Lucanegro v. State
    2D16-4727
    01/10/2017
   Hab.Corp.den.


text:
    Marchetti v. Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas
    2D16-1104
    02/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Lee)


text:
    McShay v. State
    2D16-2974
    01/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pinellas)


text:
    Mitchell v. State
    2D16-3082
    01/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Manatee)


text:
    Morell v. State
    2D16-1889
    01/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pasco)


text:
    Murphy v. State
    2D16-2470
    01/13/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Manatee)


text:
    Murray v. State
    2D16-2962
    01/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Polk)


text:
    Myers v. Modlin
    2D15-5515
    01/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Sarasota)


text:
    Nibert v. Owens
    2D15-5351
    01/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pinellas)


text:
    Norman v. State
    2D16-1127
    01/13/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Sarasota)


text:
    Oberwise v. State
    2D16-713
    01/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Otero v. State
    2D16-2978
    01/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Highlands)


text:
    Pacheco v. State
    2D16-3134
    02/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Lee)


text:
    Peterson v. State
    2D16-614
    01/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Polk)


text:
    Pink Tati, LLC v. Hillsborough County
    2D16-2618
    01/27/2017
   Den.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Pocock v. State
    2D16-2964
    01/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Polk)


text:
    Quintero v. Foster
    2D16-4020
    01/25/2017
   Den.

Cir. Ct. (Collier)


text:
    Rabow v. Comprehensive Medpsych Systems, Inc.
    2D16-3529
    01/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Sarasota)


text:
    Roberts v. State
    2D16-2817
    01/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pasco)


text:
    Rosado v. State
    2D16-2941
    01/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Polk)


text:
    Rundos Equity, LLC v. Structured Asset Mortgage Investments II, Inc.
    2D15-4844
    01/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Collier)


text:
    Schofield v. State
    2D16-5436
    01/10/2017
   Hab.Corp.den.


text:
    Shroyer v. State
    2D16-4368
    02/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Simmons v. State
    2D16-867
    01/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pinellas)


text:
    Solomon v. State
    2D16-2785
    01/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Solomon v. State
    2D16-3308
    01/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Soto v. State
    2D15-5615
    01/13/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Lee)


text:
    Stephens v. State
    2D16-2999
    02/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Sarasota)


text:
    Strange v. State
    2D16-2613
    01/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Polk)


text:
    Sykes v. State
    2D16-1945
    01/13/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Polk)


text:
    Taylor v. State
    2D16-2876
    01/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Lee)


text:
    Thompson v. State
    2D16-1864
    02/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pinellas)


text:
    Todaro v. State
    2D16-2426
    02/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Sarasota)


text:
    Towry v. State

    2D16-4623
    01/10/2017
   Mand.den.


text:
    Turbi v. State
    2D16-955
    01/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Polk)


text:
    Vann v. State
    2D16-3224
    02/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Vargas v. Taylor Morrison Services, Inc.
    2D16-3389
    01/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Vickery v. State
    2D16-2837
    01/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Waldron v. State
    2D15-3610
    01/13/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Watson v. State
    2D16-3075
    02/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pinellas)


text:
    White v. State
    2D16-2949
    01/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Polk)


text:
    Whitehead v. State
    2D16-2844
    01/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Williams v. State
    2D16-994
    01/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Sarasota)


text:
    Williams v. State
    2D16-3062
    02/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Sarasota)


text:
    Yak, LLC v. U.S. Bank National Association
    2D16-1001
    01/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pasco)


text:
    Abarca v. Castle Key Insurance Company
    3D16-989
    02/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Allen v. Miami Dade College Board of Trustees
    3D16-1288
    01/25/2017
   Aff.

Public Employees Relations Commission


text:
    Ardagh Glass, Inc. v. Quijano
    3D16-0361
    01/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Bello v. Mastrascusa
    3D15-672
    01/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Betancourt v. State
    3D16-2483
    01/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Braggs v. State
    3D16-2812
    02/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Bridgewater v. State
    3D16-1395
    01/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Brown v. State
    3D16-2802
    02/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Bustillo v. State
    3D15-1867
    01/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    C.S. v. State
    3D16-1908
    01/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    C.V.R. v. Department of Children and Families
    3D16-1870
    01/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Canino v. State
    3D16-2764
    02/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Carpenter v. State
    3D16-2458
    01/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Cazarez v. State
    3D16-2181
    01/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Charleston v. Monzon
    3D16-1720
    01/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Comptis v. State
    3D16-2765
    02/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Cooks v. State

    3D16-2269
    02/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Corrielus v. State
    3D15-2455
    01/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Covan v. Albury
    3D15-2743
    01/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Monroe)


text:
    Dante v. State
    3D16-1603
    01/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Dante v. State
    3D16-666
    01/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    DeJesus v. State
    3D15-1407
    01/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Dolce v. State
    3D16-2682
    01/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Duncan v. State
    3D16-1785
    01/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Dyck-O’Neil, Inc. v. Valdes-Orozco
    3D15-2784
    01/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Ebanks v. State
    3D16-2496
    01/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Fernandez v. State
    3D16-2595
    01/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Monroe)


text:
    Florida Peninsula Insurance Company v. Coutts
    3D16-1493
    01/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Florida Peninsula Insurance Company v. Coutts
    3D16-870
    01/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Garcia-Manriquez v. State
    3D16-1154
    01/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Gibson v. State
    3D15-943
    01/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Gonzalez v. Caterpillar, Inc.
    3D16-429
    01/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Griggs v. State
    3D16-2584
    01/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Grogan v. Harris
    3D16-1432
    01/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Harris v. State
    3D16-2652
    01/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Henney v. Frank Design, Inc.
    3D15-2911
    01/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Hufer v. Bank of New York Mellon
    3D15-1625
    01/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    HCH Enterprises, LLC, v. Sandu, LLC
    3D16-312
    01/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Isidore v. State
    3D16-787
    01/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Jackson v. Department of Revenue
    3D16-175
    01/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    James v. State
    3D16-1301
    01/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    James S. Lavold, Inc. v. Oracle Elevator Company
    3D16-887
    01/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    La-Casse v. State
    3D16-2550
    01/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Lannigan v. State
    3D16-604
    01/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    LIG Group, LLC v. Universal Handicraft, Inc.
    3D16-1628
    02/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    M.M. v. Department of Children and Families
    3D16-2097
    01/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    M.S. v. State
    3D16-506
    01/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Mager v. ECC, P.L.
    3D16-628
    02/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Major v. State
    3D15-970
    01/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Marin v. Bank of New York
    3D15-1927
    01/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Martinez v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
    3D15-2871
    01/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Martinez v. U.S. Bank National Trust
    3D16-499
    01/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Mejia v. HSBC Mortgage Services, Inc.
    3D16-923
    01/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Morales v. State
    3D16-2400
    01/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Morales v. US Bank National Association
    3D16-2639
    02/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Morris v. State
    3D16-2591
    01/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Mukamal v. Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A.
    3D16-143
    02/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Neary v. City of Key West
    3D15-1325
    01/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Monroe)


text:
    Nodarse v. Flagstar Bank, FSB
    3D15-2164
    02/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Noezile v. State
    3D16-2232
    01/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Parham v. State
    3D16-2319
    01/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Paris v. State
    3D16-2495
    01/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Passmore v. State
    3D15-1918
    01/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Paul v. State
    3D15-1763
    01/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Paul v. State
    3D16-2686
    01/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Pinder v. State
    3D16-2586
    02/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Pirela v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
    3D16-2808
    01/05/2017
   App.dism.


text:
    Regalado v. State
    3D16-2701
    01/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Rivera v. HSBC Bank N.A.
    3D15-2475
    01/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Rodriguez v. State
    3D16-1043
    01/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Roger v. State
    3D16-2771
    02/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Rojas-Tellez v. State
    3D16-2819
    02/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Salas v. State
    3D16-2234
    01/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Salazar v. The Bank of New York Mellon
    3D16-1317
    01/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Slowe v. Romero
    3D16-2015
    01/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Smith v. State
    3D16-2154
    01/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Spencer v. State
    3D16-1759
    02/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Swain v. State
    3D16-1118
    01/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Taylor v. State
    3D16-2688
    02/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Thomas v. State
    3D16-2785
    02/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Unlimited Pins, LLC v. Capparelli
    3D15-2931
    02/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Valdez v. State
    3D16-2654
    01/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Monroe)


text:
    Vega v. State
    3D16-2661
    01/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Williams v. State
    3D16-393
    01/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Monroe)


text:
    Williams v. State
    3D16-2587
    01/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Williams v. State
    3D16-2799
    02/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Wilson v. Credo, LLC
    3D16-938
    02/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Yomtov v. Wolland
    3D15-1272
    01/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Acevedo v. State
    4D16-2528
    01/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (St. Lucie)


text:
    Acker v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
    4D16-352
    01/19/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Broward)


text:
    Adams v. State
    4D15-2640
    01/26/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Broward)


text:
    Allen v. State
    4D16-3747
    01/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Broward)


text:
    Altoro v. State
    4D15-4772
    01/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (St. Lucie)


text:
    Anaya v. State
    4D16-1233
    01/26/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Broward)


text:
    Assets Overseas, LLC v. U.S. Bank National Association
    4D15-4815
    01/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Baxter v. State
    4D15-2836
    01/19/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Broward)


text:
    Beasley v. State
    4D16-3337
    01/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (St. Lucie)


text:
    Bell v. State
    4D16-2499
    01/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Broward)


text:
    Benjamin v. State
    4D16-3339, 4D16-3341
    01/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Broward)


text:
    Bowen v. State
    4D16-3275
    01/26/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Martin)


text:
    Boyle v. Nolte
    4D15-758
    01/26/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Indian River)


text:
    Brazill v. State
    4D16-672
    01/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Martin)


text:
    Brecker v. Del-aire Country Club, Inc.
    4D15-4652
    01/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Brown v. State
    4D15-3882
    01/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Indian River)


text:
    Brown v. State
    4D16-3047
    01/19/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Burgess v. State
    4D16-2208
    01/19/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Broward)


text:
    Catone v. State
    4D16-2889
    01/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Broward)


text:
    Chambers v. State
    4D16-1533
    01/26/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Broward)


text:
    Chandler v. Off Lease Only, Inc.
    4D16-2430
    01/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Cortes v. State
    4D16-2101
    01/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (St. Lucie)


text:
    Daniel v. State
    4D16-3551
    01/26/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Broward)


text:
    Desrosiers v. U.S. Bank National Association
    4D15-3237
    01/19/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Diamond v. State
    4D16-3807
    01/19/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    DJ Electrical Services of South Florida, Inc. v. Torres
    4D15-2593
    01/26/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Broward)


text:
    Fenton v. Frederickson
    4D16-2149
    01/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Figueroa v. State
    4D16-3039
    01/26/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Fleur v. State
    4D16-814
    01/26/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Broward)


text:
    Ford v. State
    4D16-2729
    01/19/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Okeechobee)


text:
    Frederick v. State
    4D16-1408
    01/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    G.C.C. v. State
    4D16-1248, 4D16-1249
    01/26/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Gamble v. Estate of Porter
    4D16-476
    01/19/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Garcia v. State
    4D13-2217
    01/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Broward)


text:
    Garcia v. State
    4D15-2204
    01/19/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Martin)


text:
    Gary v. State
    4D16-2447
    01/26/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Broward)


text:
    Gates v. State
    4D16-3806
    01/26/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Gesten v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
    4D15-4325
    01/26/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Broward)


text:
    Henry v. State
    4D16-1764
    01/19/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Broward)


text:
    Jenkins v. State
    4D15-4296
    01/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Jennings v. State
    4D15-1578
    01/19/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (St. Lucie)


text:
    Johnson v. State
    4D15-3416
    01/26/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Jones v. Blankman
    4D16-857
    01/19/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Broward)


text:
    Jones v. State
    4D16-1316
    01/26/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Broward)


text:
    Joseph v. State
    4D16-3659
    01/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Broward)


text:
    Joseph v. State
    4D14-1529
    01/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Broward)


text:
    Joseph v. State
    4D15-4363
    01/19/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Broward)


text:
    K.J.W. v. State
    4D416-1199
    01/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Keuthan v. Estate of Keuthan
    4D15-4444
    01/19/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Broward)


text:
    Linhart v. State
    4D15-875, 4D15-878
    01/26/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Broward)


text:
    Mattern v. State
    4D16-3263
    01/26/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Maxwell v. State
    4D16-3297
    01/19/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Indian River)


text:
    McDonald v. State
    4D16-3603
    01/19/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Broward)


text:
    McFadden v. State
    4D15-1622
    01/19/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Broward)


text:
    Mulvey v. State
    4D16-3456
    01/19/2017
   Aff

Cir. Ct. (St. Lucie)


text:
    N.B. v. Department of Children and Families
    4D16-3216, 4D16-3293
    01/09/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (St. Lucie)


text:
    Novick v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A.
    4D16-2317
    01/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Ordonez v. Christiana Trust
    4D15-4066
    01/19/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Broward)


text:
    Pedromiguel v. State
    4D14-4259
    01/19/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Pennington v. State
    4D15-0131
    01/26/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Broward)


text:
    Pierre v. State
    4D16-2877
    01/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (St. Lucie)


text:
    Provident Financial, LLC v. River Place on the St. Lucie Community Development District
    4D16-194
    01/19/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (St. Lucie)


text:
    Quire v. Parks
    4D15-4791
    01/19/2017
   Aff

Cir. Ct. (Broward)


text:
    Riley v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
    4D15-2062
    01/19/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Broward)


text:
    Roberts v. State
    4D16-3239
    01/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Broward)


text:
    Robinson v. State
    4D15-2342, 4D15-2475, 4D15-2476, 4D15-2477, 4D15-2478,
    01/19/2017
   Aff.

Cir, Ct, (Palm Beach)


text:
    Runge v. State
    4D16-146
    01/19/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Broward)


text:
    S.D. v. Department of Children and Families
    4D16-3654
    01/26/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Broward)


text:
    Salazar v. Wachovia Mortgage, FSB
    4D16-1515
    01/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Broward)


text:
    Samirco Investment, LLC v. Onewest Bank, FSB
    4D15-3839
    01/19/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    San Marco v. State
    4D14-3772
    01/19/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Broward)


text:
    Sanchez v. State
    4D16-4108
    01/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Schwartz v. Schwartz
    4D15-2842
    01/19/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Scott v. State
    4D16-3512
    01/26/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Broward)


text:
    Scotto v. Scotto
    4D15-735
    01/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Broward)


text:
    Shapira v. Holiday CVS, LLC
    4D14-3377
    01/26/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Broward)


text:
    Simmons v. Casablanca East, LLC
    4D15-4401
    01/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Simon v. Taylor
    4D15-2911
    01/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Broward)


text:
    Smith v. State
    4D16-2960
    01/26/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Smith v. State
    4D16-2396
    01/26/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (St. Lucie)


text:
    Snell v. State
    4D15-3395
    01/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Broward)


text:
    Soto v. State
    4D15-2001
    01/26/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Tiger v. State
    4D16-1903
    01/26/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Broward)


text:
    Tillman v. State
    4D16-3795
    01/26/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Turner v. State
    4D15-0269
    01/26/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (St. Lucie)


text:
    U.S. Bank National Association v. Farrell
    4D15-4565
    01/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Broward)


text:
    Walsh v. State
    4D16-3871
    01/19/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Broward)


text:
    Washburn v. Desantis
    4D16-1570
    01/26/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Broward)


text:
    Washington v. State
    4D16-2941
    01/26/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Broward)


text:
    Waul v. State
    4D16-3578
    01/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Martin)


text:
    Wilkins v. State
    4D15-1882
    01/19/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Martin)


text:
    Williams v. U.S. Bank National Association
    4D16-450
    01/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Broward)


text:
    Wilson v. State
    4D16-3794
    01/19/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Wimberly v. State
    4D15-3618
    01/26/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Wischer v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
    4D15-1801
    01/26/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Broward)


text:
    Wurster v. CitiMortgage, Inc.
    4D16-0634
    01/26/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Broward)


text:
    A.J. v. State
    5D16-2402
    01/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Alicea v. State
    5D16-2229
    01/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Allied Aviation, LLC v. ASIG Holdings Corp.
    5D16-1402
    01/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Alton v. State
    5D16-4182
    01/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Brevard)


text:
    Arrington v. State
    5D16-928
    01/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Volusia)


text:
    Avilez v. State
    5D16-1084
    01/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Seminole)


text:
    Bank of New York Mellon v. Dettman
    5D15-1933
    01/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Volusia)


text:
    Boatwright v. State
    5D15-442
    01/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Bond v. State
    5D16-3849
    01/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Boutin v. State
    5D16-1593
    01/10/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Citrus)


text:
    Bradley v. State
    5D16-3995
    03/15/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Brandti v. State
    5D16-943
    01/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Osceola)


text:
    Brinson v. State
    5D16-3324
    01/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Volusia)


text:
    Brown v. State
    5D16-3294
    01/10/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Brown v. State
    5D16-2679
    01/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Volusia)


text:
    Brownley v. State
    5D15-3271
    02/10/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Burnish v. Florida Department of Transportation
    5D16-2748
    01/31/2017
   Aff.

Dept. of Transportation


text:
    C.S. v. Department of Children and Families
    5D16-3855
    02/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Brevard)


text:
    Callahan v. U.S. Bank National Association
    5D16-498
    01/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Brevard)


text:
    Campbell v. Campbell
    5D16-983
    01/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Citrus)


text:
    Campbell v. State
    5D16-3914
    01/10/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Sumter)


text:
    Cella v. State
    5D16-3346
    01/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Citrus)


text:
    Chandler v. State
    5D16-2669
    01/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Volusia)


text:
    Charles v. State
    5D16-3924
    02/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Marion)


text:
    Charles v. State
    5D16-3508
    01/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Marion)


text:
    Chinelo v. State
    5D16-1452
    01/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Putnam)


text:
    Citizens Property Insurance Corporation v. Diaz
    5D15-4103
    01/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hernando)


text:
    Collins v. State
    5D16-2220
    01/03/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Volusia)


text:
    Conley v. State
    5D16-2207
    01/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Citrus)


text:
    Conner v. Department of Corrections
    5D16-2219
    01/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Marion)


text:
    Conner v. State
    5D16-3000
    01/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Coombs v. State
    5D16-2530
    01/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Cortes v. State
    5D15-4201
    01/10/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hernando)


text:
    Curbelo v. State
    5D16-1495
    01/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Cushman v. State
    5D16-4183
    01/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Brevard)


text:
    Da Silva v. City of Orlando Police Department
    5D16-261
    01/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Davis v. State
    5D15-4547
    01/03/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Osceola)


text:
    Davis v. State
    5D16-3180
    02/20/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Brevard)


text:
    Davis v. State
    5D16-4196
    01/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Osceola)


text:
    Deleon v. State
    5D16-1357
    01/10/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Osceola)


text:
    Dobson v. State
    5D16-1333
    01/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Marion)


text:
    Eastman v. State
    5D16-1318
    01/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Lake)


text:
    Eaton v. State
    5D16-3092
    01/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Eaton v. State
    5D16-3307
    01/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Seminole)


text:
    Enriquez v. State
    5D16-2733
    01/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Espino v. State
    5D16-341
    01/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Osceola)


text:
    Estate of Albee v. Coffey
    5D16-798
    02/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Volusia)


text:
    Figueroa v. State
    5D16-2832
    01/03/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)