text:
    Rodney JACOBSON, Appellant, v. Paula JACOBSON, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-1234
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed April 20, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


source: Caselaw Access Project

license: Public Domain

text:
    Porfirio RIVERA, DOC# 721446, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-3627
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed April 20, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Vaughn MCCOY, DOC #T84300, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-5221
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed April 20, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    K.C., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-1773
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed April 20, 2018.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Jarre D. HYMES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-4275
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed April 25, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Amber LANE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-120
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed April 25, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Luke KNIGHTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-2948
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed April 20, 2018.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Christopher I. JOHNSON and Linda K. Johnson, Appellants, v. Gerald T. SCHMIDT and Charlene M. Schmidt, Appellees.
    Case No. 2D17-4524
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed April 20, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Sinclair DAVIS, DC# R70885, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-3266
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed April 25, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Pedro GONZALEZ, DOC #R88320, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-3426
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed April 25, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Maurice JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-3499
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed April 25, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    David MICCICHE, DOC #T82787, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-3556
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed April 25, 2018.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Annkeisha FOSTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-4322
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed April 25, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Shamel A. THOMAS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-0623
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 29, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Jason P. KRALOVETZ, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-0399
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 29, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Granted.


text:
    Anthony CONTI, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-0653
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 29, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Granted.


text:
    Davarius Antawn DURHAM, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-0767
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 28, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Davarius Antawn DURHAM, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-0769
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 28, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Leon BRIGHT, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-0609
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 28, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Kyle M. NEWELL, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-0434
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 28, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Gelray M. GAINEY and Antonishia L. Fuller-Gainey, Appellants, v. LARSON COMMUNITIES, LLC, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-3703
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed May 2, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    SOKHEANG IM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-5050
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed May 2, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Clifton Keith JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-5104
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed May 2, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Edward HELLIWELL, DOC #T94318, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-2486
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed May 2, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Kasim MCDONALD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-4946
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed May 2, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Maxwell HENRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-4969
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed May 2, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Dennis GUYTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-4974
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed May 2, 2018.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Maurice E. CLIMES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-5046
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed May 2, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Terrance Bernard GRAHAM, DOC #Y37057, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-4155
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed May 2, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Dale R. PATE, DOC #263121, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-4282
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed May 2, 2018.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Gary W. TURLEY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-0890
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 28, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Joseph W. BULLARD, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-1047
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 28, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Mandamus is denied.


text:
    M.G., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-4999
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    April 19, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    K. R., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-4842
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    April 19, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    J.W., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-0185
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    April 19, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Andrew L. BROWN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-1382
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    April 10, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    IN the INTEREST OF G.G., a child.
    M.G., Appellant, v. Department of Children and Families and Guardian ad litem Program, Appellees.
    Case No. 2D18-2
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed May 4, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Lori Theresa GRIFFIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-4271
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed May 4, 2018.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Dennis D. WIGGINS, Appellant, v. SARASOTA COUNTY, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-2415
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed May 4, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Path K. CLARK and Shawn K. Clark, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D16-0714
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    April 30, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Outha JAMES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-2529
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed May 4, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    John G. WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-4959
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed May 2, 2018.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Shannon Douglas ROBINSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D18-494
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed May 2, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    S.M.M., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Joseph SEEBER, Superintendent, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-1284
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    April 11, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Cedric SHEFFIELD, et al., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-0921, 2D18-1153
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    May 02, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Timothy Justin TACY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-4713, 2D18-240
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    April 10, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Transferred.


text:
    R.J.C., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Joseph SEEBER, Superintendent, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-0879
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 20, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Granted.


text:
    Chyvas Ariel PEOPLES, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-0454
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    February 22, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    MARKET TAMPA INVESTMENTS, LLC, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Legal Title Trustee, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-5063
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    May 2, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Anthony NEWMAN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D16-2955
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    May 02, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Jeannie M. LANDEROS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. The BANK OF NEW YORK, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D16-3040
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 28, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Kimberly GOODMAN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Sean GOODMAN, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-5028
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    February 06, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    M. R., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-4083
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    May 10, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Appeal is dismissed.


text:
    KAREN FORSYTHE MONROE, M.D., LLC, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. ST. PETE MOB LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-1456
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    May 10, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Maurice E. CLIMES, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-0095
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    February 28, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Timothy Justin TACY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-0240
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    February 09, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Larry D. HALSTEAD & Carol Halstead, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. PLANET HOME LENDING, LLC, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-4069
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    May 10, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, O/B/O C. M. G., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. S. W. J., Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-1394
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    May 08, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Appeal is dismissed.


text:
    FLEETWING CORPORATION, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. David RICKETTS, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-1445
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    April 16, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Cedric SHEFFIELD, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. The BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-1359
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    April 11, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Jeffrey JUBENVILLE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-2016
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    May 08, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. John L. MYRICK and State of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-0997
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    April 19, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Joseph Arthur WIENDL, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Stephanie WIENDL, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-1276
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    April 18, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    David BAKER, Jr., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Amando CRUZ, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-1159
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    April 10, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Writ of mandamus is denied.


text:
    Sylvia DEMETROULAKOS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Jessica MCARDLE, As Personal Representative, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-0442
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    April 18, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Appeal is dismissed.


text:
    Christopher Edward CURTIS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-0098
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    April 11, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Maria AGUIRRE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. CENTERSTATE BANK OF FLORIDA, N.A., et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-0085
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 14, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Benson CALLIER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Tiffany HUBERT, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-0288
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    February 21, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Gary M. SHRIGLEY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-0561
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    April 18, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Peter Kevin FISCHER & Thomas Maresca, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. BANK OF AMERICA, N. A., Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-0588
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    April 18, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Appeal is dismissed.


text:
    Roland Ruben GUERRERO, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. AMERICAN EXPRESS BANK, FSB, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-0661
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    April 18, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Richard LEYTON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Janette LEYTON, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-0607
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    April 11, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Christopher Elwin FULLER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Angela Nora CRAFT, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-0759
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    April 12, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Julie A. WELCH, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Michael W. WELCH, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-0663
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    April 11, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Patricia A. SMITH and Gordon D. Smith, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STEAK N SHAKE, INC. d/b/a Steak N Shake #384, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-0969
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    April 11, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Laguerra CHAMPAGNE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-3387
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    April 11, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    C & J GLOBAL INVESTMENTS, INC., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. CAPGAIN PROPERTIES, INC., et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-4274
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    April 12, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Appeal is dismissed.


text:
    Michael LUCAS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Department of REVENUE, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-4032
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    April 11, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Gregory D. THOMAS, Jr., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-5111
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 14, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Appeal is dismissed.


text:
    Mark P. HAYE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Stephanie M. WELDON, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-4633
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    January 26, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Shedrick A. RUSSELL, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-0714
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    April 12, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Granted.


text:
    Gregory T. WHITE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-0680
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    April 12, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Belated appeal is granted.


text:
    Marquese D. GOODMAN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-1191
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    April 12, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Belated appeal is dismissed.


text:
    Omar SANDERS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-5121
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    April 11, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Appeal is dismissed.


text:
    Edwin A. Cruz VARGAS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-1308 CASE NO.: 2D17-4011
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    April 12, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Belated appeal.


text:
    Reo T. NANCE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-1160
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    April 12, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Belated appeal is dismissed.


text:
    Timothy C. HUDSON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-1016
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    April 12, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Granted.


text:
    Danny Brett BECKNER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-1005
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    April 12, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    J.D.R., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-5525
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed May 16, 2018.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Nohora PEADA, et al., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-4789
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    May 02, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Marco M. TORRES, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Hon. F.M. PERRONE, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-0842
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 29, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Vincent BODDISON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-0317
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    February 27, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Writ of habeas corpus is denied.


text:
    Robert G. GENUNG, Appellant, v. Caroline L. CONSTANTINO as Personal Representative of the Estate of Martha A. Genung, Deceased, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-3986
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed May 16, 2018.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Rafael Gilberto COLON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case Nos. 2D17-4779
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed May 16, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Randy Dale STONE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-941
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed May 16, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Lester ROSS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-1368
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed May 16, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    D.C.M., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-1350
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed May 16, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    IN RE COMMITMENT OF Jesse HALEY.
    Jesse Haley, Appellant, v. State of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-5393
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed May 16, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Y.L., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-2212
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed May 16, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Danny KUYKENDOLL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-4344
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed May 16, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Cory Cornelius COY, DOC #T14265, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-3489
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed May 16, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Benjamin J. HERRERA, DOC #H49301, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-2494
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed May 16, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Mitchell REDDIN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-1046
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    April 11, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Melvin D. WILLIAMS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-3693
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 28, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Jimmy Lee WHEELER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-3079
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    April 05, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Juan CABRERA, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-1257
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 28, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Appeal is dismissed.


text:
    Kortne Jayoun STURGIS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-0342
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    February 09, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Jimmy Lee WILLIAMS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-4736
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    January 23, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Maurice David JOHNSON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-2179
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    April 11, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Amenhotep KALFANI, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-0398
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    April 05, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Juan A. CRUZ, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-1150
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 28, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Michael S. MCKINNEY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-0337
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 27, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Kenneth WILLIAMS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-0797
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    April 13, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    David T. ROSS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-0411
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 27, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Ronald Edward BREGE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-0323
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 27, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Robert L. DAVIS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-0772
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 27, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Andres HERNANDEZ, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-0775
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    April 17, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Granted.


text:
    Wade Hampton TURNER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-5098
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    April 13, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Niji Kemp CARRINGTON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-0678
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 29, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Granted.


text:
    Michael MITCHELL, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-2197
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 28, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Appeal is dismissed.


text:
    Oscar Dan DAVIS, Jr., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D16-1749
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 28, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Greg E. ROBBINS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D16-2204
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 28, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Appeal is dismissed.


text:
    Chadrick T. THOMAS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D15-5661
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 28, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Lachlan ROTSCHREK, a/k/a Ciaran Templar-OBrien, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Julie JONES, Secretary of Department of Corrections, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-0731
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 27, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Robert John MCGINNESS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-2911
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 2, 2018.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Craig DONOFF, etc., et al., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. David STEINBERG, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D16-2153
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    OCTOBER 13, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Julio C. FERNANDEZ and Judith M. Fernandez, Appellants, v. GREAT FLORIDA BANK, Appellee.
    No. 3D17-0155
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Opinion filed October 4, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    John W. URIBE, M.D., Appellant, v. Otis J. MCDUFFIE, Appellee.
    No. 3D17-0358
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Opinion filed October 4, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Francie METAYER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 3D17-2151
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Opinion filed November 15, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Ernest KING, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 3D17-1575
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Opinion filed November 15, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Claus BLOHM and Regina Blohm, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Stefanny SOMMERS, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D16-1875
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    NOVEMBER 03, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Nicklous Travis ANDERSON, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Julie L. JONES, etc., et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-1955
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    OCTOBER 11, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Sylvia GONZALEZ, Appellant, v. ESURANCE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.
    No. 3D17-1145
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Opinion filed November 29, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Linda KILMER, Appellant, v. USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.
    No. 3D17-506
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Opinion filed November 29, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Alberto FERNANDEZ, MBA, Ph.D., Appellant, v. BARRY UNIVERSITY, INC., etc., et al., Appellees.
    Nos. 3D17-324 & 3D16-2635
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Opinion filed November 29, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Dwayne PRYCE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 3D16-422
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Opinion filed November 29, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    The BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, etc., Appellant, v. Marlen Cantero MESA and Luis Mesa, Appellees.
    No. 3D17-1026
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Opinion filed November 29, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Ronald C. MEIXNER, Appellant, v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, Appellee.
    No. 3D17-1023
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Opinion filed November 29, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Alberto RODAS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 3D17-145
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Opinion filed November 29, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Mark CHERRY and Audra Cherry, Appellants, v. US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, etc., Appellee.
    No. 3D16-1869
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Opinion filed November 29, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Routh Meloul TZUBELI and ShimsonTzubeli, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Alain KESLASSY and Evelyne Keslassy, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s)
    CASE NO.: 3D17-2376
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    NOVEMBER 27, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Miguel Angel Sordo QUINTANILLA, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. CARIB SALES, LLC, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-2485
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    NOVEMBER 21, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Transferred to the First District Court of Appeal.


text:
    Terry A. AVERA, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-2496
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    NOVEMBER 21, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Transferred to the Circuit Court Appellate Division of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit for Miami-Dade County, Florida.


text:
    Julio A. FERNANDEZ, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Patricia FERNANDEZ, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D16-2544
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    SEPTEMBER 29, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Moise HARVEY, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-2528
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    NOVEMBER 29, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Jose ESTACHE, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida and Sean Condell, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D16-1777
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    NOVEMBER 15, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Corey CHARLTON, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-0670
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    NOVEMBER 15, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    James LITTLEJOHN, et al., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, etc., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-1079
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    OCTOBER 12, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.

Denied.


text:
    Lisset FERNANDEZ and Jesus Fernandez, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. GREENTREE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-1080
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    NOVEMBER 14, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.

Granted. Remanded.


text:
    Bryant Jermaine BRADSHAW, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT PROGRAM, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-1228
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    NOVEMBER 14, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Luz SANCHEZ, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, etc., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-1291
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    NOVEMBER 14, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Howard MONTESDEOCA and Carlos Gando, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-1340
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    NOVEMBER 14, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Luis MEDEROS, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-1477
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    NOVEMBER 14, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    SIERRA INVESTMENTS GROUP, LLC, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Gonzalo Ortiz GAY and Ralph Paul Smith, Jr., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-1544
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    NOVEMBER 14, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Jose Luis RIVAS, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE CHILD SUPPORT PROGRAM and Frosini A. Smith, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-1557
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    NOVEMBER 14, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Tajhon WILSON, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-1550
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    NOVEMBER 06, 2017 Rehearing Denied November 6, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Donnie WINFREY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D17-3691
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [March 1, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    SOUTH FLORIDA MULTISPECIALTY ASSOCIATES, LLC, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. STONEGATE BANK, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-1562
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    NOVEMBER 14, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Juan E. IGLESIAS, Jr., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Daniela LOMBARDO, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-1570
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    NOVEMBER 14, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Matthew ANTHONY, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 3D17-1892
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    NOVEMBER 14, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.

Dismissed.


text:
    Thadene MATTIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D17-2603
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [April 12, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Tavares HUTCHINSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D17-3284
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [April 12, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    John David WHITE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D17-3013
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [March 22, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Michael S. MALLOR, Appellant, v. JP MORGAN CHASE, Successor In Interest To EMC Mortgage Corporation, Appellee.
    No. 4D17-3392
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [March 8, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Eric Kennedy SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D17-3083
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [May 3, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Catherine HITZGES (Cormier), Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., and BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P., f/k/a Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, L.P., Appellees.
    No. 4D17-3125
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [April 18, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    David Wayne TALLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-669
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [April 12, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Dave WATSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-474
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [April 12, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Douglas GORMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D17-3351
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [May 10, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Pedro V. SILVA, Appellant, v. Penelope HERRERA, Appellee.
    No. 4D17-3729
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [May 3, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Anthony RAYOS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D17-3169
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [May 3, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Jose Dionicio CAQUIAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-136
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [May 3, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Larry Dean STUTZMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D17-2733
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [May 10, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    The ESTATE OF Louise F. CLEPEA, A. John Clepea, Husband and Personal Representative, Appellant, v. Thomas SAMUEL, M.D., and Cassann Blake, M.D., Appellees.
    No. 4D17-3219
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [May 10, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Michael J. DOUGHERTY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D17-3482
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [May 10, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Corey Beron MCCORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-382
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [May 10, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Zachary Maurice HEATH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Nos. 4D17-3446 4D17-3447
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [May 17, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Roderick EDWARDS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-321
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [May 17, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    G.G., The Father, Appellant, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.
    Nos. 4D18-0400 4D18-0402
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [May 11, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Mirylsa COLON, M.D., Appellant, v. MELI ORTHOPEDIC CENTERS OF EXCELLENCE, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-660
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [May 10, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Oliver S. STEEL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Nos. 4D18-467 4D18-498
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [May 17, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Iakeem Jamon HARRIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-86
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [May 17, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Trevar Tyrece LINDO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D17-2445
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [May 17, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Colleen GIAMBERINI And Andrew Giamberini, Appellants, v. The BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON f/k/a The Bank of New York, Appellee.
    No. 4D17-2756
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [May 17, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Ellina KNIGHT, Appellant, v. HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee FOR MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, MANA SERIES 2007-A2, Appellee.
    No. 4D17-2757
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [May 17, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Gary P. PARADYSZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D17-3705
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [May 17, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Johnathan K. DAVIS a/k/a Jonathan K. Davis, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-444
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [May 17, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Dwight L. TOOMBS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-602
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [May 17, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Xiomara ZUNIGA, Appellant, v. PACIFIC FINANCIAL ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee.
    No. 4D18-0487
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [May 17, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Christopher Donnell WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D17-3476
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [May 17, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Yudith PEREZ-LOPEZ, Appellant, v. JUMBO EXPRESS, INC., et al, Appellee.
    No. 4D17-3493
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [May 17, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    PLAZA EAST ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellant, v. Gerald E. MARCIAL, Appellee.
    No. 4D17-3567
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [May 17, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Fernando Jose NUNEZ, Appellant, v. Lisa Dana HARRIS a/k/a Lisa Dana Tong, Appellee.
    No. 4D17-2842
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [May 17, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Richard V. PARIS, Appellant, v. Erica R. PARIS, Appellee.
    No. 4D17-3280
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [May 17, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Aron LUNA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D17-3526
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [May 17, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Harley BLEVINS, Sr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-38
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [May 17, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    John CHAPMAN, Appellant, v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION as Trustee, Successor in Interest to Bank of America, National Association as Trustee as Successor by Merger to LaSalle Bank, National Association, as Trustee for Washington Mutual Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates WMALT Series 2006-AR9, Appellee.
    No. 4D17-3179
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [May 24, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    John METZGER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-496
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [May 17, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    D'Vontai Akeem Jamar KINNEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-3969
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed March 6, 2018 Rehearing Denied April 19, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Corey Lavell GRAHAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-3030
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed February 13, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Jeffrey A. MACPHERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-3750
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed April 10, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Stephen Anthony GRESSETT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-4005
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed March 20, 2018 Rehearing Denied April 20, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Cynque THOMPSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-660
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed March 13, 2018 Rehearing Denied April 18, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Richard SULLINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-3528
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed March 6, 2018 Rehearing Denied April 17, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Frank Lewis CASAR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-3732
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed April 10, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    John Alexis CAPELLAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-3526
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed April 10, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Mark Eric OSTERBACK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-3218
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed April 10, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Juan Javier ROMO-JIMENEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-2969
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed April 10, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Raymond NORTH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-2892
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed April 10, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Dazhan KING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-2620
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed April 10, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Dwayne COLEMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-2420
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed April 10, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Steven Jonathan DOBISH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-2296
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed April 10, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    A.S., Mother of J.S., a Child, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-3781
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed April 19, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Ruvan Ricardo LAKEMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-56
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed April 17, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Stephan LABOY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-3868
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed April 17, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Garrett L. TODD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-2586
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed April 10, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    David M. WILKERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-3524
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed April 17, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Zollie Lee REDDICK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-3223
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed April 17, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Omar T. ALSTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-3209
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed April 17, 2018 Rehearing Denied May 16, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Tommie L. ANDREWS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-2199
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed April 17, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Russell Lloyd POST, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-2085
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed April 17, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Oscar FRIAS-FLORENZAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-1984
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed April 17, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Brandy BOLLOTTA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-970
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed April 17, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    David LEE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D16-4385
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed April 17, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Joseph MCDONALD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-2432
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed April 17, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    James Wilson LOPEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-1029
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed April 17, 2018 Rehearing Denied May 14, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    APELLIE CORPORATION, Appellant, v. Bruce D. FULLER, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D16-2571
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed April 17, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Pamela GODIN, Appellant, v. U.S. BANK NA, Successor Trustee to Bank of America, NA, Successor in Interest to Lasalle Bank National Association, as Trustee, on Behalf of the Holders of the Bear Stearns, Backed Securities Trust 2005-2, Asset Backed Certificates, Series 2005-2, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-596
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed April 17, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Michael Anthony BLANCA a/k/a Michael Mejia, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-458
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed April 24, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Woody TAYLOR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-443
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed April 24, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Gosset Andretti NOVA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-704
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed April 24, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Carol TREVARTHEN, Appellant, v. Scott TREVARTHEN, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-2526
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed April 17, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    J.H., Mother of A.G. and A.M.H. children, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-483 5D18-492
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed May 3, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Marcus PATTERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-235
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed April 24, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Damian SIMMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-1088
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed January 23, 2018 Rehearing Denied April 18, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


author: Levine, J.

text:
    Youvens MADEUS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D16-2881
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [March 28, 2018]
    Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Shari Vrod, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mark J. Hamel, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   Levine, J.

Appellant appeals his conviction for first-degree murder, arguing the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress statements he made to the police after his arrest. He claims that he did not waive his right to remain silent because his response to Miranda warnings was ambiguous or equivocal. We find that when appellant agreed to talk with the police "about certain things," he agreed to selectively waive his right to remain silent. We affirm the trial court's denial of appellant's motion to suppress. We find the other issue raised by appellant to be without merit and affirm that issue without further discussion.

Appellant was indicted for first-degree murder of his girlfriend. Shortly after his arrest, the police read appellant his Miranda rights. Appellant confirmed that he understood each of the rights. The detective then asked, "You're okay talking to me and telling-and answering my questions?" Appellant responded, "About certain things, yes." When the detective again asked, "Are you willing to talk to me understanding your rights; are you willing to talk to me," appellant said, "Yes, like I have said we could talk about certain things."

Before trial, appellant moved to suppress statements he made during the interview. Appellant argued that his agreement to talk "about certain things" was ambiguous and therefore not a proper waiver of his right to remain silent. The trial court denied the motion to suppress, finding that there was no ambiguity and that appellant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his rights.

In the interrogation tape played by the state for the jury, appellant admitted that he had recently fought with the victim and that he was not "happy" that she was pregnant. Appellant admitted to swinging a machete, but claimed he had not meant to swing it at the victim. Appellant also discussed past domestic violence issues between him and the victim and explained that he was angry because he did not want the victim to go to the prosecutor's office and testify against him in a different case. The medical examiner testified that a cut to the victim's neck severed her jugular vein and was the cause of her death. Additionally, DNA testing matched the victim's blood to the blade and handle of the machete.

The jury found appellant guilty as charged. This appeal follows.

"The standard of review applied to orders denying a motion to suppress is mixed: the court's factual findings are accorded deference and will be upheld if supported by competent, substantial evidence; legal conclusions, however, are reviewed de novo." State v. Weiss , 935 So.2d 110, 115 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006).

The fundamental issue in this case is whether appellant's statements were ambiguous and equivocal. If they were ambiguous or equivocal then the police officer was required to inquire further before initiating further questioning. See Alvarez v. State , 15 So.3d 738, 745 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) ("[A]n ambiguous waiver must be clarified before initial questioning."). Appellant argues that when he agreed to talk "about certain things," it was ambiguous and equivocal requiring the officer to clarify further before proceeding with questioning. We disagree.

When appellant agreed to talk "about certain things," he selectively waived his Miranda rights. In fact, there was nothing ambiguous about what he said. Appellant waived his rights regarding "certain things" but not about other matters. Further, he declared his willingness to talk except for "certain things" without hesitation or equivocation.

In United States v. Krug , No. CR 09-01148 MMM, 2012 WL 12951703 (C.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2012), the defendant was read his Miranda rights and inserted the following on his advice of rights card: "I am willing to answer some questions without a lawyer." Id. at *2, 9. The defendant argued that the insertion of the word "some" on the rights card made his answer ambiguous, requiring further inquiry by the special agents. Id. at *10.

The Krug court found that a "defendant may selectively waive his Miranda rights by agreeing to answer some questions, but not others." Id. at *9. Specifically, a "suspect may selectively waive his right to remain silent in one of two ways. He may either tell the police that he will not discuss certain subjects, or the suspect may ... inform the police that he is willing to discuss only specific subjects." Id. (citation omitted). The court concluded that the defendant "affirmatively stated that he would answer 'some' questions, and thus unequivocally, but selectively, waived his right to remain silent and consult with an attorney." Id. at *10. "To hold that such a waiver was ambiguous would negate the rule that a defendant can selectively waive his Miranda rights." Id. See also Michigan v. Mosley , 423 U.S. 96, 103-04, 96 S.Ct. 321, 46 L.Ed.2d 313 (1975) (recognizing that a defendant, "[t]hrough the exercise of his option to terminate questioning[,] can control the time at which questioning occurs, the subjects discussed, and the duration of the interrogation").

In the present case, like in Krug , appellant claims that his answer was ambiguous and required further inquiry. To the contrary, appellant was merely informing the police that he was willing to speak to the police except for "certain things." It is certainly within the right of the defendant to limit the parameters of the questions that he would be willing to answer. To hold otherwise would "negate" appellant's right to "selectively waive his Miranda rights." See Krug , 2012 WL 12951703 at *10 ; see also Gonzalez v. State , 136 So.3d 1125, 1145 (Fla. 2014) (holding mere "refusal to answer several questions" during interrogation was not invocation of right to remain silent).

Further, this holding is consistent with those of other courts which have found similar waivers not ambiguous or equivocal. See United States v. Fuentes , No. 13-CR-1025-TOR-2, 2015 WL 144409, at *4 (E.D. Wash. Jan. 12, 2015) (finding a defendant's waiver neither equivocal nor ambiguous where the defendant, when asked whether he would be willing to answer questions, stated: "Depends on the question"); United States v. Eaton , 890 F.2d 511, 513 (1st Cir. 1989) (finding an unequivocal waiver where the defendant, again asked if he would answer questions, "said that it would depend on the questions and he would answer some questions if he thought it appropriate"); Bruni v. Lewis , 847 F.2d 561, 564 (9th Cir. 1988) (finding an unambiguous waiver where the defendant first stated that he would not answer questions without an attorney, but then said, "Well, ask your questions and I will answer those I see fit").

In conclusion, we find that appellant gave a selective waiver of his Miranda rights by agreeing to answer the detective's questions "about certain things." This response was in no way equivocal or ambiguous and therefore the detective was able to question appellant without any obligation to clarify appellant's answer. Thus, we affirm the trial court's denial of appellant's motion to suppress.

Affirmed.

Conner and Forst, JJ., concur.


author: Per Curiam.

text:
    Oliver S. STEEL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Nos. 4D18-467 4D18-498
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [March 14, 2018]
    Oliver S. Steel, Okeechobee, pro se.
    No appearance required for appellee.
   Per Curiam.

Oliver Steel challenges the January 2, 2018 order of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit that denied his challenge to his sentence for first degree murder as unconstitutional. He has challenged the order on its merits in 4D18-498, and by petition for writ of certiorari challenged the circuit court's jurisdiction to enter the order in 4D18-467. We redesignate the certiorari petition to be a final appeal of the January 2, 2018 order, consolidate the two cases and affirm the circuit court's order. See Alvarez v. State , 358 So.2d 10 (Fla. 1978) ; Baron v. State, 39 So.3d 1274 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) ; Ratliff v. State , 914 So.2d 938 (Fla. 2005).

Affirmed .

Warner, Levine and Conner, JJ., concur.


author: Gerber, C.J.

text:
    Jorge CASTILLO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D16-1452
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [April 18, 2018]
    Jonathan Smulevich and Ronald S. Lowy of Lowy and Cook, P.A., Miami, for appellant.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Don M. Rogers, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   Gerber, C.J.

The defendant raises several arguments following his open guilty plea to multiple counts arising from his multimillion dollar enterprise of trafficking contraband prescription drugs. Based on the state's concession of error on two of the defendant's arguments, we reverse the defendant's conviction on one count, and remand for resentencing on another count. On the defendant's remaining arguments relating to his alleged lack of competency to enter the plea, we affirm. We write primarily to address the competency arguments.

Procedural History

A nine-count information charged the defendant and five others with several crimes. The defendant was charged in eight of the nine counts: trafficking in contraband drugs (count one), conspiracy to traffic contraband prescription drugs (count two), organized scheme to defraud (count three), and five counts of money laundering (counts five through nine). The defendant was not charged in count four.

1. The Plea Colloquy

The defendant entered an open guilty plea to the eight counts with which he was charged. During the circuit court's plea colloquy, the following exchange occurred:

COURT: Are you currently under the influence of any alcohol, drugs, or prescription medication?
DEFENDANT: Yes.
COURT: Okay. What do you take, sir?
DEFENDANT: I'm taking a prescription for my mental health for brain contusions. ...
COURT: ... Have you been diagnosed with a mental illness?
DEFENDANT: I have an accident in 2011 where I hit my head .... After that, I was in a coma. And a lot of problems come after that to me.
COURT: Okay. Has a doctor diagnosed you with something specific?
DEFENDANT: ... I have depression, I been having a lot of problems. I been seeing a psychologist, a psychiatrist.
....
COURT: How do you feel today?
....
DEFENDANT: Since I have the accident, I have a lot of problems. I get confused. I need to see my doctor about it. I no see my doctor for three years, my neurologist.
....
COURT: Okay. What I'm trying to figure out is if you can make an intelligent and knowing waiver of your rights. And based upon your answers, I can't make that finding because I don't understand your answers. So the question is how do you feel today?
DEFENDANT: Feel fine.
COURT: Okay. Are any symptoms of mental illness, any of your depression or any of those symptoms affecting you today?
DEFENDANT: No.
COURT: ... Is your medication controlling your symptoms?
DEFENDANT: Yes.
COURT: And are you able to communicate with your lawyer?
DEFENDANT: Yes.
COURT: Are you able to understand me when I speak to you?
DEFENDANT: Yes.
COURT: And any trouble concentrating?
DEFENDANT: A lot.
....
COURT: Okay. So what is the trouble, sir?
....
DEFENDANT: I don't function the same as before. I have a lot of seizures all the time, every day, several times a day.
....
DEFENSE COUNSEL: Do you understand what's going on now?
DEFENDANT: Yes, I do.
DEFENSE COUNSEL: Do you understand the judge?
DEFENDANT: Yes, I understand.
....
COURT: Have you had a seizure today?
DEFENDANT: Not that I know of. No, I'm fine.
....
COURT (to defense counsel): Do you have any issues about his competency?
DEFENSE COUNSEL: Not today, no. I think he understands fully what's going on today.
COURT: Sir, I need you to pay attention to my questions and answer my questions specifically. Not about what happened in the past but about today. Are you having any trouble following along today?
DEFENDANT: No.
COURT: Are you having any trouble concentrating today?
DEFENDANT: No.
COURT: Are you taking your medication as prescribed by your doctor?
DEFENDANT: Yes.
COURT: And is the medication working for all that you know?
DEFENDANT: Yes.

The court proceeded to explain the remainder of a standard plea colloquy, and for each explanation, the defendant indicated he understood the plea and its consequences. The court then accepted the defendant's guilty pleas as knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily entered.

2. The Sentencing Hearing

At the sentencing hearing, the defendant moved for a downward departure, primarily pursuant to section 921.0026(2)(d), Florida Statutes (2015) ("The defendant requires specialized treatment for a mental disorder that is unrelated to substance abuse or addiction or for a physical disability, and the defendant is amenable to treatment."). In support, the defendant presented the testimony of the neurologist who treated him for thirteen months after his injury in 2011. In the first few months after the injury, the defendant was confused and not acting normally. During later visits, the defendant was having difficulty with cognition and concentration. Over the next several months, the defendant's condition did not improve. According to the neurologist, the defendant "acted almost like a lobotomized patient. He was passive, confused, forgetting things. Just walked like a robot." The neurologist testified that the defendant needed regular neurological visits and regular psychiatric medications for his behavior. When defense counsel asked the neurologist if the defendant was capable of repeating the behavior underlying the charged crimes, the neurologist responded, "Well, certainly, at the time, thirteen month period I last saw him, from late 2011 to the end of 2012, absolutely not. He was simple, confused. He was not able to do anything sophisticated. He was very impaired neurologically, incompetent."

In response to the neurologist's testimony, the state presented several witnesses. A Department of Corrections senior physician testified that he had reviewed the defendant's medical records, and did not see any medical requirement which could not be addressed by the Department's health care system. One of the law enforcement officers who investigated the defendant's crimes testified that the defendant's contraband prescription drug enterprise generated $28 million before the defendant's injury, and another $15 million after the injury. Another law enforcement officer testified that he interviewed the defendant for several hours after the defendant was arrested, and the defendant did not appear confused, but instead was clear as to the facts about the crimes. Finally, the defendant's ex-wife testified that although the defendant had some physical effects from his injury, he stopped going to doctor visits, and continued with his crimes, including an attempt to expand his enterprise into Puerto Rico.

During closing arguments, defense counsel relied on the neurologist's testimony about having treated the defendant. The state relied upon its witnesses' testimony that the defendant's criminal conduct continued well after the defendant recovered from his injury.

The circuit court denied the defendant's motion for downward departure. The court recognized that although it could depart from the minimum guidelines sentence, the court found it should not depart, mentioning that the defendant had not seen the neurologist for three years and that his crimes occurred both before and after his injury.

The court then adjudicated the defendant guilty, and sentenced the defendant to twenty-five years in prison, on each of counts one through nine, to run concurrent with each other. The court rendered this decision even though the defendant was not charged in count four, and even though a twenty-five year sentence exceeded the defendant's maximum possible sentence on count two.

The Appeal

This appeal followed. The defendant raises four arguments, none of which was argued to the circuit court: (1) he was improperly convicted and sentenced on count four when he was not charged in count four; (2) he was given an illegal sentence on count two; (3) the circuit court erred in failing to conduct a competency hearing; and (4) the defendant's plea was not voluntary because he was incompetent at the time of the plea.

1. The Defendant's First Two Arguments

On the defendant's first argument, the state properly concedes that the defendant was improperly convicted and sentenced on count four when he was not charged in count four. See Jaimes v. State, 51 So.3d 445, 448 (Fla. 2010) ("It is a fundamental principle of due process that a defendant may not be convicted of a crime that has not been charged by the state."); Powell v. State , 174 So.3d 498 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) ("A conviction of an uncharged crime can be raised at any time as it is a denial of due process."). Therefore, we reverse the defendant's conviction on count four, and remand for the circuit court to correct the judgment by vacating the defendant's conviction and sentence on count four.

On the defendant's second argument, the state properly concedes that the defendant was given an illegal sentence on count two. Count two charged the defendant with conspiracy to traffic in contraband prescription drugs, a second degree felony. Under section 775.082(3)(d), Florida Statutes (2013), the maximum sentence for a second degree felony is fifteen years. However, the defendant's lowest permissible sentence under the code was 237.45 months, or 19.78 years, and under section 921.0024(2), Florida Statutes, (2013), "[i]f the lowest permissible sentence under the code exceeds the statutory maximum sentence as provided in s. 775.082, the sentence required by the code must be imposed." The twenty-five year sentence on count two exceeded the sentence required by the code of 237.45 months, or 19.78 years. Therefore, we reverse the sentence on count two, and remand for the circuit court to impose the correct sentence required by the code of 237.45 months, or 19.78 years, on count two.

2. The Defendant's Third and Fourth Arguments

We conclude the defendant's third and fourth arguments, that the circuit court erred in failing to conduct a competency hearing, and that the defendant's plea was not voluntary, lack merit. We first address our jurisdiction before turning to the merits.

a. Jurisdiction

In Dortch v. State , 242 So.3d 431, 2018 WL 1617082 (Fla. 4th DCA April 11, 2018), we recently held:

[T]o raise the issue of a failure to comply with Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.210 - 212 on direct appeal, it is not necessary that a defendant first file a motion to withdraw plea under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(2)(A) in cases where the trial court has reasonable grounds to believe the defendant is incompetent and has ordered an examination. Indeed, the rules mandate a hearing and an order under such circumstances. This is true regardless of whether the defendant has previously been declared incompetent. This mandate does not apply however if the trial court had no reasonable grounds to believe the defendant is incompetent.
To require a criminal defendant, who may be incompetent, to file a motion to withdraw a plea before raising the issue on appeal is unwarranted. If a defendant is incompetent, confining him to post-conviction relief, without the assistance of counsel, is not a remedy designed to do justice.

242 So.3d at 433, 2018 WL 1617082 (emphasis added; footnote omitted). Dortch receded from previous cases in which we held, for example, that "[a]lthough a trial court's failure to order a competency hearing on its own motion when it reasonably appears necessary constitutes an abuse of discretion, we do not deem such error 'fundamental' so as to obviate the need for filing a motion to withdraw in the trial court before attacking the voluntariness of the plea on appeal."

Burns v. State , 884 So.2d 1010, 1014 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) (footnote omitted). Thus, even though the defendant did not raise this issue to the circuit court by objection or by the filing of a motion to withdraw his plea, we have jurisdiction to consider the defendant's arguments.

b. Merits

We now consider the merits of the defendant's arguments. As we indicated in Dortch, the test of whether a court errs in not conducting a competency hearing turns on whether the court, at a material stage of the proceeding, had a reasonable ground to believe the defendant was not mentally competent to proceed. This test arises from the plain language of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.210(b) :

If, at any material stage of a criminal proceeding, the court ... has a reasonable ground to believe that the defendant is not mentally competent to proceed, the court shall immediately enter its order setting a time for a hearing to determine the defendant's mental condition , which shall be held no later than 20 days after the date of the filing of the motion, and may order the defendant to be examined by no more than 3 experts, as needed, prior to the date of the hearing.

Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.210(b) (emphasis added). A "material stage of the proceeding" includes "entry of a plea" and "sentencing." Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.210(a)(1). The test for whether a defendant is competent is "whether [the defendant] has sufficient present ability to consult with [the defendant's] lawyer with a reasonable degree of rational understanding-and whether [the defendant] has a rational as well as factual understanding of the proceedings against [the defendant]." Peede v. State , 955 So.2d 480, 488 (Fla. 2007).

We review the circuit court's decision not to hold a competency hearing for an abuse of discretion. See Kelly v. State , 797 So.2d 1278, 1280 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (the "standard of review of a trial court's decision regarding whether to hold a competency hearing is abuse of discretion"). Further, "a trial court does not err when it does not conduct an inquiry concerning the defendant's mental competency ... where no showing of mental incompetency was made and no request by the defendant for such an inquiry was made." Campo v. State , 24 So.3d 735, 736 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009).

Here, we find no abuse of discretion. Our review of the record indicates the circuit court did not have a reasonable ground to believe the defendant was incompetent before accepting the defendant's plea or sentencing the defendant. We would go further to say that competent substantial evidence existed that the defendant was competent at both stages.

At no time did the defendant's counsel request a competency hearing or even suggest that the defendant was incompetent. After the plea colloquy revealed that the defendant suffered a brain injury four years before entering the plea, the court thoroughly inquired whether that injury was affecting the defendant's ability to understand the plea and its consequences. Although the defendant initially confused the inquiry by referring to his condition immediately after the injury, the defendant ultimately testified he understood the plea and its consequences when the court focused the defendant on his ability to understand everything at the time of the plea. When the court asked defense counsel whether defense counsel had any issues about the defendant's competency, defense counsel candidly answered, "Not today, no. I think he understands fully what's going on today." Cf. Burns , 884 So.2d at 1014 n.1 ("Even if we were to pass on the merits of this case, we would be hard pressed to find an abuse of discretion where defense counsel advised the court that the defendant's competency was not an issue and assured the court that the defendant's ability to understand the proceedings had actually improved since the earlier court proceedings when he was found competent to proceed.").

The defendant's reliance on his neurologist's testimony, presented at the sentencing hearing in pursuit of a downward departure sentence, is unavailing as an attempt to show that the court had a reasonable ground to believe the defendant was incompetent before the court accepted the defendant's plea, or when the court sentenced the defendant. We recognize the neurologist used certain comparisons to discuss the defendant's condition in the months after the defendant's injury -the defendant "acted almost like a lobotomized patient. He was passive, confused, forgetting things. Just walked like a robot." We also recognize that the neurologist used the word "incompetent," when testifying that the defendant "was simple, confused. He was not able to do anything sophisticated. He was very impaired neurologically, incompetent." However, the neurologist expressly testified that his observations were limited to the months immediately after the defendant's injury, and that he had not treated the defendant in the three years before the defendant's plea.

Moreover, even if we were to accept the neurologist's testimony about the defendant's condition in the months after the defendant's injury, the state's evidence about the defendant's condition in the years leading up to the plea and sentencing rebutted the defendant's claim on appeal that he was incompetent at the time of the plea or sentencing. One of the law enforcement officers who investigated the defendant's crimes testified that the defendant's contraband prescription drug enterprise generated $28 million before the defendant's injury, and another $15 million after the injury. Another law enforcement officer testified that he interviewed the defendant for several hours after the defendant was arrested, and the defendant did not appear confused, but instead was clear as to the facts about the crimes. Finally, the defendant's ex-wife testified that although the defendant had some physical effects from his injury, he stopped going to doctor visits, and continued with his crimes, including an attempt to expand his enterprise into Puerto Rico.

We do not accept the defendant's oral argument that the mere fact the neurologist used the word "incompetent" during his testimony at the sentencing hearing should have been a per se basis for the circuit court to have found that it had a reasonable ground to believe the defendant was incompetent at the time of the plea or sentencing. Again, the neurologist's testimony was limited to describing the defendant's condition in the months after the defendant's injury, not in the later three years leading up to the plea or at the time of the plea or sentencing. Also, it appears from the face of the neurologist's testimony that his use of the term "incompetent" was not intended to describe the defendant's ability to enter a knowing, intelligent, and voluntary plea in a legal context. Rather, the neurologist merely was trying to convey the defendant's capabilities after the injury in a medical context. As such, the mere fact the neurologist used the word "incompetent" during his testimony did not provide a reasonable ground to believe that the defendant was not mentally competent to proceed at the time of the plea or sentencing.

Conclusion

Based on the foregoing, we reverse the defendant's conviction and sentence on count four and remand for correction of the judgment on count four, and reverse the defendant's sentence on count two, and remand for the circuit court to impose the correct sentence required by the code of 237.45 months, or 19.78 years, on count two. Appellant need not be present for either action. See, e.g. , Dougherty v. State , 785 So.2d 1221, 1223 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) ("The imposition of a sentence is a crucial stage at which the defendant is entitled to be present. ... An exception is made in resentencing cases where all that is required on remand is a ministerial act of sentence correction."). We affirm the defendant's remaining convictions and sentences.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for correction of judgment on count four and correction of sentence on count two.

May and Damoorgian, JJ., concur.