text:
    Cardome, LLC v. City of Bonita Springs
    2D16-4395
    05/19/2017
   Cert.den.

Cir. Ct. (Lee)


source: Caselaw Access Project

license: Public Domain

text:
    Carswell v. State
    2D16-1920
    05/19/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Lee)


text:
    Cassidy v. CitiMortgage, Inc.
    2D16-1206
    05/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Polk)


text:
    Castanedo v. State
    2D16-4486
    05/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Sarasota)


text:
    Castellano v. Bank of New York
    2D15-5457
    05/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pinellas)


text:
    Castro v. Wilmington Trust NA
    2D16-2524
    05/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pasco)


text:
    Cavaliere v. State
    2D15-2987
    05/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pinellas)


text:
    Chandler v. State
    2D16-254, 2D16-2902
    05/10/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Charlotte)


text:
    Chatman v. State
    2D16-1452
    05/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Chatman v. State
    2D16-5589
    05/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    City of Zephyrhills v. Shipley
    2D17-6
    05/10/2017
   Cert. den.

Cir. Ct. (Pasco)


text:
    Claridy v. State
    2D16-2299
    05/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Sarasota)


text:
    Clark v. State
    2D16-5370
    05/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Sarasota)


text:
    Clarkson v. State
    2D17-0474
    05/24/2017
   App.dism.


text:
    Coney v. State
    2D16-4968
    05/03/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hardee)


text:
    Cox v. State
    2D16-1885
    05/19/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pinellas)


text:
    Coz v. State
    2D16-2652
    05/10/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Manatee)


text:
    Crawford v. State
    2D16-3345
    05/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Manatee)


text:
    Criollo v. State
    2D15-5218
    05/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Lee)


text:
    Crozer v. State
    2D16-313
    05/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Polk)


text:
    Cruz v. State
    2D16-5138
    05/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pasco)


text:
    Culver v. State
    2D16-4955
    05/03/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Polk)


text:
    Culver v. State
    2D16-4161
    05/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Polk)


text:
    D.L.L. v. State
    2D16-4628
    05/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Polk)


text:
    D.L.R. v. Proposed Adoption of K.R.R.
    2D16-472
    05/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Lee)


text:
    Davis v. State
    2D16-4391
    05/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pinellas)


text:
    Delaine v. State
    2D16-1347
    05/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Polk)


text:
    Delgado v. State
    2D17-1443
    05/05/2017
   Belated App. den.


text:
    Dema Investments, LLC for Trust No. 100HR Dated June 29, 2014 v. Bank of New York
    2D15-4811
    05/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Polk)


text:
    Desenberg v. Desenberg
    2D16-3746
    05/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Sarasota)


text:
    Deutsche Bank National Trust Company for Registered Holders of New Century Home Equity Loan Trust Series 2005-B v. Panther Trace Homeowners Association, Inc.
    2D16-1294
    05/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Devine v. Branch Banking and Trust Company
    2D16-3940
    05/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pinellas)


text:
    Dopico v. State
    2D16-5463
    05/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Doty v. Doty
    2D15-4295
    05/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Polk)


text:
    Dugger v. State
    2D16-4110
    05/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Polk)


text:
    Dyer v. Descompresion Axial SL
    2D16-2981
    05/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pinellas)


text:
    Eberhardt v. Jones
    2D16-5551
    05/24/2017
   Mand.den.


text:
    Esposito v. State
    2D17-0989
    05/12/2017
   App.dism.


text:
    Feimster v. State
    2D16-5470
    05/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pasco)


text:
    Fields v. State
    2D16-3772
    05/10/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Sarasota)


text:
    Forbes v. State
    2D16-5449
    05/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Fouquet v. State
    2D16-2437
    05/19/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Polk)


text:
    Foy v. State
    2D16-4200
    05/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pinellas)


text:
    Funk v. State
    2D16-4311
    05/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    G.J.O., II v. C.H.
    2D16-4824
    05/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Gage v. State
    2D16-2136
    05/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Polk)


text:
    Garcia v. State
    2D16-5145
    05/10/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Polk)


text:
    Garnto v. State
    2D16-4839
    05/03/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Lee)


text:
    Gomez v. State
    2D16-4142
    05/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Collier)


text:
    Grace v. State
    2D15-2881
    05/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Lee)


text:
    Green v. State
    2D16-923
    05/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Griffin v. State
    2D16-5011
    05/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Polk)


text:
    Grogan v. State
    2D16-3073
    05/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pasco)


text:
    Guide v. State
    2D16-3636
    05/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Manatee)


text:
    Gulf Management, Inc. v. Dasrat
    2D16-1664
    05/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Hall v. State
    2D16-4057
    05/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pinellas)


text:
    Hammond v. State
    2D16-1678
    05/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (DeSoto)


text:
    Hardgrove v. State
    2D17-304
    05/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Harris v. State
    2D16-4910
    05/10/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Sarasota)


text:
    Harris v. State
    2D16-3984
    05/26/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Harris v. State
    2D17-1546
    05/04/2017
   Cert.den.


text:
    Harter v. Federal National Mortgage Association
    2D14-5986
    05/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Hayes v. State
    2D15-1099
    05/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Hearns v. State
    2D15-3515
    05/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Sarasota)


text:
    Henderson-Butler v. State
    2D16-5573
    05/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Hernandez v. State
    2D16-1576
    05/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Polk)


text:
    Hettel v. State
    2D16-2301
    05/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Manatee)


text:
    Hidden Haven II Homeowners Association v. HMC Assets, LLC
    2D16-3583
    05/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Hiers v. State
    2D16-4867
    05/03/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pinellas)


text:
    Hill v. State
    2D16-1874
    05/19/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Polk)


text:
    Humphery v. State
    2D16-5098
    05/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Humphery v. State
    2D16-5360
    05/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Hunter v. State
    2D16-5029
    05/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Polk)


text:
    Hutchinson v. State
    2D16-3966
    05/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    In re Commitment of Freeze; Freeze v. State
    2D16-4803
    05/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (DeSoto)


text:
    In re Estate of Kassay; Catania v. Carll
    2D16-4598
    05/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Sarasota)


text:
    In Interest of A.W.; M.W. v. Department of Children and Families
    2D16-5226
    05/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    In Interest of C.T.P.; R.B. v. J.P.
    2D16-4948
    05/03/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pinellas)


text:
    In Interest of D.E.; L.G. v. Department of Children and Families
    2D16-4523
    05/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Lee)


text:
    In Interest of G.J.; A.J. v. Department of Children and Families
    2D17-199
    05/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    In Interest of I.R.G.; J.M. v. Heart of Adoptions, Inc.
    2D16-5354
    05/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    In Interest of J.S.; J.R. v. Department of Children and Families
    2D16-4899
    05/19/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    In Interest of K.M.M.; A.M.G. v. Department of Children and Families
    2D16-5498
    05/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Manatee)


text:
    In Interest of K.S.; B.C. v. Department of Children and Families
    2D17-334
    05/19/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Charlotte)


text:
    In Interest of M.J.G.; M.G. v. Department of Children and Families
    2D16-5452
    05/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Manatee)


text:
    In Interest of M.L.; M.L.V. v. Department of Children and Families
    2D17-47
    05/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Manatee)


text:
    In Interest of O.R.T.; H.K.V. v. Department of Children and Families
    2D16-5167
    05/19/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Charlotte)


text:
    In Interest of S.W.; J.W. v. Heart of Adoptions, Inc.
    2D17-564
    05/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    In Interest of Z.G.; R.L. v. Department of Children and Families
    2D16-4351
    05/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pasco)


text:
    Investor Trustee Services, LLC v. PNC Bank National Association
    2D15-4549
    05/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pasco)


text:
    Jackson v. State
    2D16-5062
    05/10/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Sarasota)


text:
    Jackson v. State
    2D16-3761
    05/19/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Jamison v. State
    2D16-3607
    05/03/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pasco)


text:
    Jefferson v. State
    2D16-4004
    05/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Polk)


text:
    Jenkins v. State
    2D17-1806
    05/10/2017
   Cert.gr.


text:
    Johns v. State
    2D17-1956
    05/22/2017
   Hab.Corp.den.


text:
    Johnson v. Palladini
    2D16-3619
    05/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Johnson v. State
    2D16-762
    05/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Charlotte)


text:
    Johnson v. State
    2D16-4608
    05/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Polk)


text:
    Johnston v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC
    2D16-3111
    05/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pinellas)


text:
    Jones v. City of Tampa
    2D16-2074
    05/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Jones v. State
    2D16-2906
    05/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Polk)


text:
    Jupiter House LLC v. Wilmington Trust Company
    2D16-3821
    05/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Kahl-Winter v. State
    2D16-5169
    05/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pasco)


text:
    Kaley v. State
    2D16-3914
    05/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Polk)


text:
    Kenville v. Levitan
    2D16-1937
    05/19/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Collier)


text:
    Kilpatrick v. State
    2D16-4016
    05/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Polk)


text:
    Klein v. State
    2D16-4205
    05/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Knight v. State
    2D17-1912
    05/26/2017
   Belated App.gr.


text:
    Kuehn v. State
    2D15-4840
    05/10/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Sarasota)


text:
    Lafalaise v. State
    2D16-4039
    05/10/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pinellas)


text:
    Laferty v. State
    2D16-4936
    05/26/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Lambert v. Lambert
    2D16-999
    05/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Land v. State
    2D16-5086
    05/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pinellas)


text:
    Land v. State
    2D16-5348
    05/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pinellas)


text:
    LaFabre v. State
    2D16-4013
    05/10/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Polk)


text:
    Lee v. State
    2D16-1429
    05/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Polk)


text:
    Lewis v. State
    2D16-4927
    05/03/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Littler v. State
    2D16-4147
    05/10/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Manatee)


text:
    Llano Financing Group, LLC v. Baker
    2D16-4295
    05/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Polk)


text:
    Luman v. State
    2D16-832
    05/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Polk)


text:
    Mack v. State
    2D16-4058
    05/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pinellas)


text:
    Mack v. State
    2D16-4296
    05/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Maharajh v. Standard Pacific of Tampa GP, Inc.
    2D16-2565
    05/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Manatee County v. Boltwood
    2D16-3242
    05/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Manatee)


text:
    Mangelsdorf v. State
    2D15-1920
    05/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pinellas)


text:
    Mangen v. State
    2D16-5565
    05/26/2017
   App.dism.


text:
    Mansell v. State
    2D17-1850
    05/22/2017
   Pet.den.


text:
    Martinez v. State
    2D16-4106
    05/10/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Polk)


text:
    McCall v. State
    2D16-4091
    05/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Manatee)


text:
    McCloud v. State
    2D16-5494
    05/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pinellas)


text:
    McClure v. Standish
    2D16-5050
    05/03/2017
   Cert. den.

Cir. Ct. (Pinellas)


text:
    McFadden v. BL Restaurant Operations, LLC
    2D16-3605
    05/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Lee)


text:
    McKnight v. State
    2D16-4347
    05/19/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Medero v. State
    2D17-1454
    05/08/2017
   Pet.den.


text:
    Merritt v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
    2D16-5083
    05/24/2017
   Cert. den.

Cir. Ct. (Polk)


text:
    Metz v. State
    2D16-4387
    05/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Lee)


text:
    Middleton v. State
    2D16-4693
    05/10/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pasco)


text:
    Midgett v. State
    2D16-4350
    05/19/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Polk)


text:
    MidFirst Bank v. Guilinger
    2D15-1745
    05/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Sarasota)


text:
    Miller v. State
    2D16-4044
    05/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Sarasota)


text:
    Mills v. State
    2D16-4709
    05/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Sarasota)


text:
    Moore v. State
    2D16-4930
    05/03/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pinellas)


text:
    Morgado v. Morgado
    2D16-2433
    05/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Collier)


text:
    Neal v. State
    2D15-5056
    05/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Lee)


text:
    Neff v. State
    2D16-4876
    05/03/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Highlands)


text:
    Nelson v. State
    2D16-4701
    05/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Charlotte)


text:
    Newman v. State
    2D16-4939
    05/03/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Charlotte)


text:
    Newsome v. State
    2D16-4302
    05/10/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Neymour v. Goodwin
    2D16-2539
    05/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pasco)


text:
    Norman v. State
    2D15-5070
    05/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Sarasota)


text:
    North American Group, Inc. v. Roswell Properties, LLC, Ltd.
    2D16-2832
    05/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Lee)


text:
    Ogle v. State
    2D16-5461
    05/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Polk)


text:
    Olmedo v. State
    2D16-3032
    05/10/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pinellas)


text:
    Orttel v. Deering
    2D16-3095
    05/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pinellas)


text:
    Ospina-Florez v. State
    2D15-4449
    05/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Owens v. State
    2D16-4554
    05/19/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pinellas)


text:
    OB Florida CRE Holdings, LLC v. HG Coconut, LLC
    2D16-2509
    05/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Lee)


text:
    Pace v. State
    2D16-4933
    05/10/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Manatee)


text:
    Palmore v. State
    2D16-4985
    05/19/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Parkerson v. State
    2D16-4991
    05/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Polk)


text:
    Perry v. State
    2D16-2232
    05/03/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pinellas)


text:
    Perry v. State
    2D15-4148
    05/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Polk)


text:
    Peterson v. State
    2D16-2856
    05/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Polk)


text:
    Peterson v. State
    2D16-5140
    05/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Peterson v. State
    2D17-455
    05/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Phillips v. State
    2D16-3674
    05/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Polk)


text:
    Powell v. State
    2D15-2431
    05/03/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Powell v. State
    2D16-5467
    05/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Manatee)


text:
    Prater v. State
    2D15-4621
    05/10/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Lee)


text:
    Price v. State
    2D16-5198
    05/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (DeSoto)


text:
    Primavera v. State
    2D16-3600
    05/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    R.G.S. v. State
    2D16-1141
    05/19/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Polk)


text:
    Rawls v. State
    2D17-201
    05/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hardee)


text:
    Reed v. State
    2D16-3323
    05/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Highlands)


text:
    Reidemeister v. HSBC Bank USA, National Association for Wells Fargo Asset Securities Corporation
    2D16-1542
    05/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Collier)


text:
    Reinhardt v. State
    2D16-5218
    05/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Sarasota)


text:
    Rice v. State
    2D16-3210
    05/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Richards v. Hutcherson
    2D16-5410
    05/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Highlands)


text:
    Rivera v. State
    2D16-5158
    05/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Roberts v. State
    2D16-1366
    05/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Polk)


text:
    Roberts v. State
    2D16-4137
    05/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pinellas)


text:
    Robinson v. State
    2D16-2827
    05/19/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Polk)


text:
    Rodriguez v. State
    2D15-2961
    05/10/2017
   Reversed; Remanded

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Rodriguez-Torres v. State
    2D15-4555
    05/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pinellas)


text:
    Romanes v. State
    2D16-4033
    05/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Rosas v. James B. Nutter & Company
    2D15-5688
    05/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Rosier v. State
    2D16-4021
    05/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Lee)


text:
    Rowan v. U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. for LSF8 Master Participation Trust by Caliber Home Loans, Inc.
    2D16-1923
    05/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Lee)


text:
    Rutherford v. State
    2D16-4958
    05/10/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Sampson v. State
    2D16-2640
    05/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pinellas)


text:
    Sancio v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission
    2D16-3519
    05/12/2017
   Aff.

Reemployment Assistance Apps. Com’n


text:
    Santiago v. State
    2D16-4823
    05/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pinellas)


text:
    Santiago v. State
    2D16-2670
    05/26/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pinellas)


text:
    Sarasota Doctors Hospital, Inc. v. Poteralski
    2D16-5444
    05/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Sarasota)


text:
    Scott v. State
    2D16-1971
    05/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pinellas)


text:
    Sexton v. State
    2D16-716
    05/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Sarasota)


text:
    Shaw v. State
    2D16-5189
    05/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Lee)


text:
    Smith v. State
    2D16-4913
    05/03/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pasco)


text:
    Smith v. State
    2D16-4117
    05/10/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Collier)


text:
    Smith v. State
    2D15-4679
    05/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Smith v. State
    2D16-5610
    05/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Smith v. State
    2D16-4829
    05/19/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Smith v. State
    2D16-4082
    05/26/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Polk)


text:
    Smith v. State
    2D16-5378
    05/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Smith v. State
    2D16-4849
    05/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Smith v. State
    2D16-4846
    05/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Smith v. Wallace
    2D16-2086
    05/10/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Soccolich v. Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB for Primestar-H Fund I Trust
    2D16-3892
    05/17/2017
   Dism.

Cir. Ct. (Manatee)


text:
    Solomon v. State
    2D17-113
    05/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Polk)


text:
    Sosa v. State
    2D16-4897
    05/10/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Stanley v. State
    2D16-4140
    05/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Stanley v. State
    2D15-5742
    05/19/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pinellas)


text:
    State v. Burton
    2D16-4202
    05/24/2017
   Cert.dism.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    State v. Debuhr
    2D15-5478
    05/19/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pinellas)


text:
    State v. Troemner
    2D17-632
    05/24/2017
   Cert. den.

Cir. Ct. (Collier)


text:
    Staten v. State
    2D16-1361
    05/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Sterling Oaks Community Association and Club, Inc. v. Federal National Mortgage Association
    2D16-4119
    05/19/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Collier)


text:
    Strole v. State
    2D16-4370
    05/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pinellas)


text:
    T.R.H. v. State
    2D16-3208
    05/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pinellas)


text:
    Teal v. State
    2D16-5493
    05/19/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pinellas)


text:
    Thames v. State
    2D14-3629
    11/06/2015
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Polk)


text:
    Thomas v. State
    2D15-1870
    05/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Thomas v. State
    2D15-2973
    05/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Thompson v. State
    2D15-1894
    05/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pasco)


text:
    Trinkle v. State
    2D15-5726
    05/03/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Polk)


text:
    Trotter v. Green Tree Servicing, LLC
    2D16-1875
    05/10/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Charlotte)


text:
    Trust No. 905 E A Dated 07/02/2015, Dema Investments, LLC v. Green Tree Servicing, LLC
    2D16-1397
    05/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pinellas)


text:
    Ussery v. State
    2D16-1308
    05/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Manatee)


text:
    Valdes v. Dyck-O'Neal, Inc.
    2D16-1784
    05/19/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Vickers v. State
    2D16-4593
    05/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Victor v. State
    2D16-3890
    05/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Vilbon v. Christiana Trust, a Division of Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB for Stanwich Mortgage Loan Trust, Series 2013-3
    2D16-962
    05/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Collier)


text:
    Villalobos v. State
    2D15-639
    05/10/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pinellas)


text:
    Walker v. Judd
    2D16-4050
    05/10/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Polk)


text:
    Walker v. State
    2D15-1102
    05/10/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Walker v. State
    2D15-3866
    05/19/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pinellas)


text:
    Walker v. State
    2D16-2118
    05/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Lee)


text:
    Wanda DiPaola Stephen Rinko General Partnership v. Beach Terrace Association, Inc.
    2D16-3363
    05/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Sarasota)


text:
    Watkins v. State
    2D15-222
    05/12/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Lee)


text:
    Weinhold v. Probus
    2D16-4419
    05/17/2017
   Cert.dism.

Cir. Ct. (Sarasota)


text:
    Weinstein v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
    2D16-1295
    05/03/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Lee)


text:
    Weir v. Bank of America, N.A.
    2D16-3724
    05/10/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pinellas)


text:
    Welch v. State
    2D16-4807
    05/10/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Whipple v. State
    2D15-5720
    05/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pinellas)


text:
    Wilborn v. State
    2D16-4747
    05/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Williams v. State
    2D15-315
    05/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pinellas)


text:
    Williams v. State
    2D16-1148
    05/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Polk)


text:
    Williams v. State
    2D16-4331
    05/19/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hillsborough)


text:
    Williams v. State
    2D16-3429
    05/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pinellas)


text:
    Williams v. State
    2D16-5061
    05/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pinellas)


text:
    Williams v. State
    2D16-5319
    05/26/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Manatee)


text:
    Windish v. State
    2D16-4753
    05/26/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Hills-borough)


text:
    Winter v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC
    2D16-3675
    05/19/2017
   Aff,

Cir. Ct. (Pinel-las)


text:
    Wolfe v. State
    2D16-3938
    05/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Pasco)


text:
    Woodard v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission
    2D16-2596
    05/05/2017
   Aff,

Reemployment Assistance Apps. Com'n


text:
    Wyatt v. CIT Bank
    2D16-433
    05/05/2017
   Dism,

Cir. Ct. (Hills-borough)


text:
    Young v. State
    2D17-49
    05/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir, Ct. (Hills-borough)


text:
    Zuelly v. State
    2D17-1596
    05/22/2017
   Pet.den,


text:
    THIRD DISTRICT
    Abdul v. State
    3D16-305
    05/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Anestin v. State.
    3D17-693
    05/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct, (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Bezada v. PennyMac Corp.
    3D16-2134
    05/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Bois v. State
    3D17-497
    05/10/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct, (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Brady v. State
    3D17-696
    05/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct, (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Burdette v. DREIA LLC
    3D16-2461
    05/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir, Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    C.G. v. Department of Children and Families
    3D17-472
    05/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Monroe)


text:
    Carmona v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission
    3D17-101
    05/10/2017
   Aff.

Reemployment Assistance Apps. Com’n


text:
    Citizens Property Insurance Corporation v. Constantine
    3D16-73
    05/03/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Clark v. State
    3D17-608
    05/10/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Craver v. State
    3D17-617
    05/10/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Delva v. State
    3D16-2067
    05/10/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Esteban-Rodriguez v. State
    3D16-2685
    05/10/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Esty v. State
    3D17-520
    05/10/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Fernandez v. State
    3D16-2567
    05/10/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Florida Peninsula Insurance Company v. Naranjo
    3D16-1075
    05/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Fontaine v. Fontaine
    3D16-985
    05/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Garcia v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company ex rel. Holders of J.P. Morgan Mortgage Acquisition Trust 2007-CH1 Asset Backed Pass-Through Certificates Series 2007-CH1
    3D16-1307
    05/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. Dade) (Miami-


text:
    Green v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company
    3D16-974
    05/03/2017
   Aff.

Cir, Ct. Dade) (Miami-


text:
    Guerra v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
    3D16-239
    05/10/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. Dade) (Miami-


text:
    Guida-Bernia v. Citizens Property Insurance Corporation
    3D16-1180
    05/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct, Dade) (Miami-


text:
    Hernandez v. Hernandez
    3D16-864
    05/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. Dade) (Miami-


text:
    Hernandez v. State
    3D17-88
    05/10/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. Dade) (Miami-


text:
    Horne v. State
    3D16-1746
    05/10/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. Dade) (Miami-


text:
    In-Time, Inc. v. Metromall Partners, Ltd.
    3D16-1945
    05/10/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. Dade) (Miami-


text:
    Jean v. State
    3D17-473
    05/10/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. Dade) (Miami-


text:
    Kalu v. State
    3D17-563
    05/10/2017
   Aff,

Cir. Ct. Dade) (Miami-


text:
    Kapitanova v. MacDonald
    3D16-2331
    05/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. Dade) (Miami-


text:
    Kinas v. Kakon, LLC
    3D16-1982
    05/10/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. Dade) (Miami-


text:
    Lovett v. State
    3D17-610
    05/10/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. Dade) (Miami-


text:
    Macaluso v. Insurance Auctions, LLC
    3D16-1867
    05/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. Dade) (Miami-


text:
    Marimon v. State
    3D17-522
    05/03/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. Dade) (Miami-


text:
    Mesa v. Bank of New York Mellon
    3D16-2145
    05/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. Dade) (Miami-


text:
    Mesa v. State
    3D17-212
    05/03/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. Dade) (Miami-


text:
    Moore v. State
    3D17-217
    05/10/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. Dade) (Miami-


text:
    Morales v. State
    3D16-1635
    05/10/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Morris v. State
    3D16-1817
    05/10/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Norte v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission
    3D16-756
    05/17/2017
   Aff.

Reemployment Assistance Apps. Com'n


text:
    Orellana v. Chicken Kitchen USA, LLC
    3D16-1639
    05/10/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Ortega v. Extreme Precision Inc.
    3D16-267
    05/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Perea v. State
    3D16-2743
    05/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Perez v. State
    3D17-747
    05/10/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Pernell v. State
    3D16-2877
    05/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Pitts v. State
    3D16-327
    05/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Rivera v. State
    3D14-373
    05/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Saavedra v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
    3D16-996
    05/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    SaintFleur v. State
    3D16-2738
    05/10/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Sanchez v. State
    3D16-1349
    05/10/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Smith v. State
    3D17-749
    05/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Sotolongo v. State
    3D17-0554
    05/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Spivey v. State
    3D16-2123
    05/03/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Stanley v. Braff
    3D17-12
    05/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Monroe)


text:
    State v. Iribar
    3D16-1470
    05/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Valdes v. State
    3D17-126
    05/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Valdez v. State
    3D16-1213
    05/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Viera v. State
    3D16-481
    05/10/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Walker v. State
    3D17-611
    05/24/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Watson v. State
    3D15-1337
    05/03/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Worley v. State
    3D17-349
    05/03/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Yearby v. State
    3D17-953
    05/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    Yee v. State
    3D15-2356
    05/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)


text:
    FOURTH DISTRICT
    A.A. v. State
    4D15-3225
    05/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    A.M. v. Department of Children and Families
    4D17-470
    05/19/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Indian River)


text:
    Amisial v. State
    4D16-1131
    05/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Aranda v. State
    4D15-3564
    06/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Arizmendi v. Branch Banking and Trust Company
    4D16-2186
    05/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Assets Overseas, LLC v. Sandalwood Homeowners Association, Inc.
    4D16-2436
    05/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Baltazar v. State
    4D17-354
    05/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Barber v. State
    4D16-196
    05/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Barnett v. State
    4D15-4731
    05/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Barron v. State
    4D17-405
    05/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (St. Lu-cie)


text:
    Berg v. State
    4D17-66
    06/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (St. Lu-cie)


text:
    Bollmann v. State
    4D16-1428
    05/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Boothe v. U.S. Bank, N.A. for Stanwich Mortgage Loan Trust Series 2012-3
    4D16-4313
    05/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Bowers v. State
    4D16-2496
    05/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Boyd v. State
    4D17-768
    05/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Breitberg v. State
    4D17-95
    06/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Brown v. State
    4D17-0342, 4D17-0343
    05/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Martin)


text:
    Brown v. State
    4D17-193
    05/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Brown v. State
    4D17-0959
    06/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Martin)


text:
    Browne v. Strochak
    4D16-2286
    05/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Bryan v. State
    4D15-1710, 4D15-1812, 4D15-2438
    05/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Budd v. State
    4D15-2194
    05/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Buhot v. State
    4D15-2952
    05/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir, Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    C.A. v. State
    4D16-1234
    05/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    C.A. v. State
    4D16-1191
    05/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    C.C. v. Department of Children and Families
    4D16-4222
    05/03/2017
   Aff,

Cir. Ct, (St. Lu-cie)


text:
    C.H. v. State
    4D16-2773
    05/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    C.S. v. Department of Children and Families
    4D17-673
    05/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (St. Lu-cie)


text:
    Cajilus v. State
    4D15-1599
    05/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Caldwell v. State
    4D16-2715
    06/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct, (St. Lu-cie)


text:
    Cannon v. State
    4D16-2810
    05/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct, (St. Lu-cie)


text:
    Carter v. State
    4D16-3534
    05/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct, (Indian River)


text:
    Chavez v. Astete
    4D16-2134
    05/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Cleveland v. State
    4D16-4377
    06/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Cohen v. State
    4D17-781
    05/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (St. Lu-cie)


text:
    Collins v. State
    4D17-0265
    05/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Martin)


text:
    Cotellese v. Navigation, Inc.
    4D16-2170
    05/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Coutilien v. State
    4D16-3837
    05/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Crowley v. State
    4D16-956
    05/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Indian River)


text:
    D'Amico v. State
    4D17-784
    05/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    D’Amico v. State
    4D17-842
    05/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Darden v. State
    4D16-1447
    06/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir, Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Deemer v. State
    4D16-886
    05/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Dixon-Hyman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
    4D16-832
    05/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Duguay v. Adrenalina Incorporated
    4D15-3212
    05/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir, Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Early v. State
    4D17-629
    05/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir, Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Elliott v. State
    4D17-628
    05/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Emley v. State
    4D17-552, 4D17-553, 4D17-554
    06/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct, (Okeechobee)


text:
    Essex v. State
    4D17-0705
    05/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Evalle v. U.S. Bank National Association for Lehman XS Trust Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-4N
    4D16-4164
    05/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir, Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Exalus v. Marbra Investments, LLC
    4D16-3137
    05/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    F.M. v. State
    4D15-4796, 4D15-4797
    05/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir, Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Faggen v. Fireman
    4D16-3225
    05/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Fede v. LNV Corporation
    4D16-1189
    06/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Ferguson v. State
    4D17-403
    05/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Finnegan v. State
    4D14-4121
    05/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Martin)


text:
    Fleishman v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
    4D16-2288
    05/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Fletcher v. Kimble
    4D16-3653
    05/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Flowers v. CitiMortgage, Inc.
    4D15-89
    05/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Francis v. State
    4D16-1043
    05/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Freeman v. State
    4D16-2760
    06/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct, (Bro-ward)


text:
    Frey-Neighbours v. Palm Beach County Sheriff’s Office
    4D16-1277
    05/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Gallagher v. Webb
    4D16-2107
    05/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Indian River)


text:
    Gambrel v. Bethesda Hospital, Inc.
    4D16-2394
    06/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    General Electric Company v. Express Logistics, LLC
    4D16-3669
    05/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Gillette v. State
    4D16-4112
    05/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Golan v. Golan
    4D16-2798
    05/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Goldstein v. Socal Capital LLC
    4D16-2534
    05/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Gomez v. Bank of America, N.A.
    4D16-1377
    05/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Gonzalez v. State
    4D17-622
    05/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Gonzalez v. Wickboldt
    4D16-2319
    05/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Gramkow v. Nationwide Advantage Mortgage Company
    4D16-1187
    05/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Grimes v. State
    4D17-472
    05/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Guardian Ad Litem Program v. L.S.
    4D17-0455
    06/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Indian River)


text:
    H&R Block Bank v. Charles
    4D16-3060
    06/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (St. Lu-cie)


text:
    Hamlet v. City of Hallandale Police Department
    4D16-1491
    05/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Hammond v. State
    4D16-4288
    05/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Haneef v. State
    4D17-0728
    06/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Hardy v. State
    4D16-920
    05/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Okeechobee)


text:
    Head v. State
    4D16-2727
    05/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Okeechobee)


text:
    Henry v. State
    4D17-323
    05/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Hill v. State
    4D17-0780
    05/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (St. Lu-cie)


text:
    Ho Min Kim v. State
    4D17-1017
    05/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Holley v. State
    4D17-524
    05/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Holley v. State
    4D17-1022
    06/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Howell v. State
    4D16-1913
    05/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Hubbard v. State Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission
    4D16-4088
    05/11/2017
   Aff.

Reemployment Assistance Apps. Com'n


text:
    J.B. v. State
    4D16-1037
    06/01/2017
   Aff.


text:
    Jackson v. State
    4D17-47
    05/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (St. Lu-cie)


text:
    Jackson v. State
    4D16-1853
    06/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm ■Beach)


text:
    Jean v. Bank of America, N.A.
    4D16-153
    05/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Jett v. State
    4D15-4418
    05/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Jinli Guo v. Yang Guo
    4D16-2466
    05/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Johnson v. State
    4D17-630
    05/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Johnson v. State
    4D16-3231
    05/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (St. Lu-cie)


text:
    Johnson v. State
    4D17-0774
    06/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (St. Lu-cie)


text:
    Jones v. State
    4D16-1522
    05/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (St. Lu-cie)


text:
    Jones v. State
    4D16-3307
    05/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (St. Lu-cie)


text:
    Jones v. State
    4D15-3715
    05/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Joseph v. State
    4D15-3371
    05/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Joyce v. Bank of America, N.A.
    4D15-2324
    05/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Justice v. State
    4D17-0538
    05/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct, (Bro-ward)


text:
    Kablitz v. State
    4D17-744
    05/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Kaufmann v. Valley National Bank, N.A.
    4D16-1833
    05/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    King v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC
    4D16-2183
    05/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Kostyo v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
    4D16-1851
    05/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Kupritz v. Chase Bank USA, N.A.
    4D16-2047
    05/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Laurent v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
    4D16-1138
    05/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    League v. State
    4D16-2197
    05/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Lee v. State
    4D17-558
    05/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Okeechobee)


text:
    Lopez v. State
    4D16-2984
    05/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Lovett v. State
    4D15-2954
    05/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Lytal v. Dimitrijevic
    4D16-2514
    05/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Manning v. State
    4D17-910
    06/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. ()


text:
    Marshall v. U.S. Bank National Association for Truman ACM Grantor Trust 2013, Series 2013-1
    4D14-4300
    05/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Mathieu v. State
    4D15-492
    05/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (St. Lu-cie)


text:
    Mathurin v. State
    4D16-3809
    05/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    McCullough v. State
    4D17-703
    05/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Medina v. Vecellio & Grogan, Inc.
    4D16-2097
    06/01/2017
   Aff.

Div. of Admin. Hearings


text:
    Morris v. State
    4D16-3305
    05/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Moya v. State
    4D16-0655
    05/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (St, Lu-cie)


text:
    Muhammad v. State
    4D16-1766
    05/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (St, Lu-cie)


text:
    Mulvaney v. State
    4D17-541
    05/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Murdock v. Murdock
    4D16-2094
    05/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct, (Bro-ward)


text:
    Nassau Square, LLC v. Wellington Acquisition, LLC
    4D16-1609
    05/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct, (Palm Beach)


text:
    Newman v. Newman
    4D15-4279
    05/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Outlaw v. State
    4D15-3250
    05/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (St. Lu-cie)


text:
    Palmer v. State
    4D17-659
    05/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Palmer v. State
    4D17-925
    05/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Papageorge v. State
    4D15-1445
    05/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct, (St. Lu-cie)


text:
    Paul v. Avrahami
    4D16-3429
    05/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir, Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Paulk v. State
    4D16-339
    05/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Peters v. State
    4D16-4049
    05/17/2017
   Aff.

Cir, Ct, (Bro-ward)


text:
    Pitcher v. Zappitell
    4D15-4461, 4D16-1421
    05/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Ramirez v. State
    4D15-4750
    05/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct, (Palm Beach)


text:
    Reid v. State
    4D17-258
    05/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Rico v. Green Tree Servicing, LLC
    4D16-639
    05/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct, (Bro-ward)


text:
    Rios v. State
    4D15-1269
    05/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Rius v. Schuttler & Greenberg, LLC
    4D16-0967
    05/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Rochester v. Young
    4D16-3245
    05/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Roderiques v. Cypress Hut, Inc.
    4D16-1059
    05/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Okeechobee)


text:
    Russ v. State
    4D17-0491
    05/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    S.B. v. State
    4D16-2460
    06/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct, (Bro-ward)


text:
    S.C. v. State
    4D16-2703
    05/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Schwarz v. State
    4D16-2082, 4D16-2083, 4D16-2084
    05/04/2017
   Aff,

Cir. Ct. (Martin)


text:
    Sharpe v. State
    4D16-0145
    05/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Sloane v. State
    4D16-451
    05/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Slobodow v. Rose Newman Revocable Trust
    4D16-2327
    05/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Smith v. State
    4D15-2528
    05/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward) '


text:
    Smith v. State
    4D15-2951
    06/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir, Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Snedeker v. State
    4D17-783
    05/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Martin)


text:
    Sonata Florida, LLC v. Sonata Beach Club Condominium Association, Inc.
    4D16-1561
    05/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Spivak v. U.S. Bank National Association for SG Mortgage Securities Asset Backed Certificates, Series 2006-FRE2
    4D15-4562
    05/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    St. Lucie County School Board v. Renaissance Charter School, Inc.
    4D15-2905
    05/04/2017
   Aff.

Div. of Admin. Hearings


text:
    State v. Robinson
    4D16-1912
    06/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    State v. Robinson
    4D16-1911
    06/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Stinson v. State
    4D16-0047
    05/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Indian River)


text:
    Swatts v. State
    4D16-1565
    05/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Martin)


text:
    Termotto v. DB Private Wealth Mortgage, Ltd.
    4D16-4145
    05/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir! Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Terry v. State
    4D16-1086
    05/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Thomas v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
    4D16-3562
    05/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Toha v. State
    4D14-4120
    05/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Trimble v. State
    4D15-1889
    05/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Martin)


text:
    Troutman v. State
    4D15-3220
    06/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Velasquez v. State
    4D17-839
    06/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Velleff v. Velleff
    4D16-0889
    05/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (St. Lu-cie)


text:
    Veltre v. State
    4D16-2776
    06/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (St. Lu-cie)


text:
    Viner v. State
    4D17-0132
    05/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Martin)


text:
    Visconti v. Visconti
    4D16-2206, 4D16-2575
    05/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Walker v. State
    4D15-3318
    05/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Warren v. State
    4D16-3892
    05/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (St. Lu-cie)


text:
    Washington v. State
    4D17-383
    05/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Werth v. Florida Department of Children and Families
    4D16-2367
    05/11/2017
   Aff.

Dept, of Children and Families


text:
    Wheeler v. State
    4D15-3190
    05/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Whitaker v. State
    4D17-0642
    05/11/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Williams v. State
    4D17-0030
    05/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (St. Lu-cie)


text:
    Wolfe v. State
    4D17-0753
    05/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bro-ward)


text:
    Wouldard v. State
    4D17-478
    05/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Indian River)


text:
    Yearwood v. State
    4D17-0042
    05/18/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Martin)


text:
    Z.T J. v. State
    4D16-3915
    06/01/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Indian River)


text:
    Ziadie v. Department of Business & Professional Regulation, Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering
    4D16-0436
    05/24/2017
   Aff.

DBPR


text:
    Zimmet v. Winkler
    4D16-2706
    05/04/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    Zuehlke v. State
    4D17-710
    05/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    1000 Friends of Florida v. City of Westlake
    4D16-1730
    05/25/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)


text:
    FIFTH DISTRICT
    A.J.H. v. State
    5D16-4310
    05/23/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    A.R. v. Department of Children and Families
    5D16-4174
    05/03/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Seminole)


text:
    Ad-Tek Specialties, Inc. v. Acme Imports, Inc.
    5D16-1298
    05/16/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Adams v. State
    5D17-688
    05/16/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bre-vard)


text:
    Aguirre v. State
    5D16-3125
    05/02/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Lake)


text:
    Alejandro v. Total Health Chiropractic Solutions, Inc.
    5D16-357
    05/02/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Alisma v. State
    5D17-746
    05/23/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Allen v. City of DeBary
    5D16-3543
    05/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Volu-sia)


text:
    Alls v. Department of Revenue ex rel. Gosa
    5D16-3644
    05/02/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Almendariz v. State
    5D15-4439
    05/16/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Her-nando)


text:
    Ancrum v. State
    5D16-4055
    05/09/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Sumter)


text:
    Andrews v. State
    5D17-106
    05/16/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bre-vard)


text:
    Austell v. State
    5D16-4116
    05/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Volu-sia)


text:
    Bansrupan v. Harricharran
    5D16-1759
    05/09/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Basaldua v. State
    5D17-862
    05/23/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Citrus)


text:
    Beausoleil v. State
    5D16-4022
    05/09/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (St. Johns)


text:
    Belle v. State
    5D16-3356
    05/02/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Volu-sia)


text:
    Benabe-Rivera v. State
    5D17-562
    05/02/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Benjamin v. State
    5D17-779
    05/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bre-vard)


text:
    Blair v. State
    5D16-3493
    05/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Seminole)


text:
    Blair v. State
    5D16-1268
    05/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Blanton v. State
    5D16-2105
    05/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Citrus)


text:
    Bollinger v. State
    5D16-1765
    05/16/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (St. Johns)


text:
    Bostick v. State
    5D17-621
    05/02/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Citrus)


text:
    Bower v. State
    5D16-3400
    05/09/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Citrus)


text:
    Boyles v. State
    5D16-410
    05/16/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (St. Johns)


text:
    Brown v. State
    5D17-673
    05/16/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Bryant v. State
    5D16-3310
    05/02/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Bryant v. State
    5D16-2673
    05/23/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Citrus)


text:
    Burno v. State
    5D17-668
    05/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Lake)


text:
    Burruss v. State
    5D16-3423
    05/16/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Butler v. State
    5D16-2405
    05/02/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    C.X.C. XI, L.L.C. v. PV Commercial Properties, Inc.
    5D16-786
    05/23/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (St. Johns)


text:
    Carlyle v. State
    5D16-3856
    05/02/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bre-vard)


text:
    Central Florida Expressway Authority v. Tropical Trailer Leasing, LLC
    5D16-549
    05/02/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    City of Satellite Beach v. Goersch
    5D16-250
    05/09/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bre-vard)


text:
    Civil v. State
    5D16-3915
    05/09/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct, (Orange)


text:
    Clairvin v. State
    5D16-755
    05/16/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bre-vard)


text:
    Cohen v. State
    5D16-3477
    05/02/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Marion)


text:
    Coleman v. State
    5D15-3969
    05/02/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Cookston v. Office of State Attorney
    5D16-1039
    05/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir, Ct. (Marion)


text:
    Cookston v. Polak
    5D16-404, 5D16-801
    05/02/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Marion)


text:
    Crew v. State
    5D16-3392
    05/16/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Volu-sia)


text:
    Crow v. State
    5D16-1080
    05/02/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Seminole)


text:
    Curry v. State
    5D15-4475
    05/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Marion)


text:
    Davis v. State
    5D17-914
    05/23/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Seminole)


text:
    DeJesus-Rivera v. State
    5D16-1984
    05/09/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Osceola)


text:
    Dickerson v. State
    5D17-440
    05/23/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bre-vard)


text:
    Douglas v. U.S. Bank National Association
    5D17-757
    05/09/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Driggers v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission
    5D16-3536
    06/05/2017
   Aff.

Reemployment Assistance Apps. Com'n


text:
    Durfey v. State
    5D17-577
    05/23/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Eavey v. Zalewski
    5D16-859
    05/02/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Seminole)


text:
    Edwards v. Garmon
    5D16-1557
    05/23/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct, (St. Johns)


text:
    Elma v. State
    5D16-2613
    05/09/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Estate of DeNucci v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association
    5D15-4031
    06/28/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Seminole)


text:
    Fisher v. State
    5D15-4306
    05/12/2017
   Reversed; Remanded

Cir. Ct. (Osceola)


text:
    Florido v. State
    5D16-2421
    05/02/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Putnam)


text:
    Flynn v. State
    5D15-852
    06/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Fordham v. State
    5D16-145
    05/02/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct, (Volu-sia)


text:
    Francis v. State
    5D16-2764
    05/16/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Garcia v. State
    5D16-2956
    05/02/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Seminole)


text:
    Gardner v. State
    5D16-2906
    05/02/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Volu-sia)


text:
    Globis v. State
    5D16-1872
    05/16/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Citrus)


text:
    Gonzalez v. State
    5D16-485
    05/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Gordon v. State
    5D16-2383
    05/23/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Volu-sia)


text:
    Grant v. State
    5D17-178
    05/02/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Grant v. State
    5D16-2742
    06/02/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Volu-sia)


text:
    Grant v. State
    5D16-1864
    05/16/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bre-vard)


text:
    Graves v. State
    5D16-3469
    05/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Grieco v. State
    5D16-2361
    05/23/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bre-vard)


text:
    Grubbs v. Selene Finance, LP
    5D16-4004
    05/23/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Putnam)


text:
    Gullo v. State
    5D16-1946
    05/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Volu-sia)


text:
    Gutierrez v. Bank of New York Mellon
    5D16-3291
    05/23/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Hall v. State
    5D16-3151
    05/02/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bre-vard)


text:
    Harris v. State
    5D17-790
    05/16/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bre-vard)


text:
    Haynes v. State
    5D17-830
    05/23/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Lake)


text:
    Hernandez-Monzalvo v. State
    5D17-709
    06/07/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Hix v. Stewart
    5D16-3041
    05/16/2017
   Aff.

Education Practices Com’n


text:
    Holcomb v. Holcomb
    5D17-643
    06/19/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Lake)


text:
    Houston v. State
    5D16-3714
    05/23/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Marion)


text:
    Howell v. State
    5D17-819
    05/12/2017
   Pet.gr.


text:
    Hunter v. State
    5D16-3939
    05/09/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Seminole)


text:
    Hunter v. State
    5D16-172
    05/23/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Seminole)


text:
    Imeson v. Enright
    5D16-3480
    06/07/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (St. Johns)


text:
    J.J.R. v. State
    5D16-3827
    05/02/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Jabbarizadeh v. Behzadan
    5D16-2600
    05/16/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Jackson v. State
    5D16-3229
    05/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    James v. State
    5D16-3138
    05/02/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Seminole)


text:
    Johnson v. State
    5D17-257
    05/09/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Jones v. Department of Corrections
    5D17-408
    05/23/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Seminole)


text:
    Keith v. State
    5D17-762
    05/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Osceola)


text:
    Khetani v. State
    5D15-3202, 5D15-3932
    05/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Osceola)


text:
    Kingery v. Kingery
    5D16-2815
    05/23/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Marion)


text:
    Koon v. Van Horn
    5D16-2922
    05/23/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    KSG America, LLC v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company for Ameriquest Mortgage Securities Inc.
    5D16-1424
    06/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Seminole)


text:
    Lavender v. State
    5D16-1762
    05/02/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (St. Johns)


text:
    Leroy v. State
    5D16-1980
    05/16/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Seminole)


text:
    Lester v. Orange County Board of County Commissioners
    5D16-2124
    05/09/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Lewis v. State
    5D16-4164
    05/02/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Volu-sia)


text:
    Lewis v. State
    5D16-1042
    05/09/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Marion)


text:
    Linville v. State
    5D17-588
    05/23/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Citrus)


text:
    Lloyd v. Department of Corrections
    5D16-4315
    05/09/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Lake)


text:
    Lloyd v. State
    5D16-3697
    05/23/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Volu-sia)


text:
    Lynn ex rel. Lynn v. Alliance Foundation of Florida, Inc.
    5D16-3822
    05/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Volu-sia)


text:
    Mannarino v. Haller
    5D16-3459
    05/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Seminole)


text:
    Marcott v. State
    5D16-1592
    05/09/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Volu-sia)


text:
    Martinez v. State
    5D17-652
    05/23/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Maynard v. State
    5D16-4396
    05/16/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Citrus)


text:
    McCloy v. State
    5D16-3287
    05/09/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bre-vard)


text:
    McCray v. State
    5D16-1611
    05/02/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Volu-sia)


text:
    McKenna v. State
    5D17-123
    06/07/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bre-vard)


text:
    McMillan v. State
    5D17-399
    05/02/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bre-vard)


text:
    McMullen v. State
    5D17-301
    05/09/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Sumter)


text:
    Mercado v. State
    5D16-2423
    05/09/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Osceola)


text:
    Michael’s VIPs, Inc. v. Bean
    5D16-3498
    05/09/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Miller v. State
    5D16-2578
    05/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Citrus)


text:
    Minogue v. State
    5D16-769
    05/23/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Volu-sia)


text:
    Mitchell v. State
    5D16-2761
    05/02/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Mitchell v. State
    5D16-2027
    05/02/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Osceola)


text:
    Moise v. State
    5D16-4398
    05/02/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Moreno-Colon v. State
    5D15-4117
    05/09/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Morgan v. State
    5D17-496
    05/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Seminole)


text:
    Mountjoy v. State
    5D17-191
    05/16/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Osceola)


text:
    Moynihan v. State
    5D16-4123
    05/16/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Citrus)


text:
    Munoz v. State
    5D15-3873
    05/02/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Nash v. State
    5D16-3836
    05/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Citrus)


text:
    Nelson v. State
    5D17-620
    05/26/2017
   Pet.gr.


text:
    Nieves v. State
    5D16-3813
    05/02/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Volu-sia)


text:
    Noble v. Seg Gateway, LLC
    5D14-3962
    05/16/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Noble v. SEG Gateway, LLC
    5D14-3964
    05/16/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct, (Orange)


text:
    O'Conner v. State
    5D16-3529
    05/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir, Ct. (Seminole)


text:
    Omni Healthcare, Inc. v. Pearson
    5D16-1998
    05/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct, (Bre-vard)


text:
    Palma v. State
    5D17-473
    05/16/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct, (Marion)


text:
    Palmer v. MMA Realty Capital, LLC
    5D16-213
    05/23/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Parcher v. State
    5D16-4151
    05/09/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Parrish v. US Bank National Association for Master Alternative Loan Trust 2007-1
    5D16-1730
    05/02/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bre-vard)


text:
    Pate v. State
    5D16-1677
    05/23/2017
   Aff.

Cir, Ct. (Marion)


text:
    Payne v. State
    5D16-1177
    05/02/2017
   Aff.

Cir, Ct. (Bre-vard)


text:
    Penrod v. State
    5D16-1800
    05/16/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Sumter)


text:
    Peralta v. State
    5D16-4248
    05/09/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Pinder v. State
    5D17-782
    05/09/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct, (Orange)


text:
    Ponce v. Figueroa
    5D16-3744
    05/09/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Povilaitis v. Povilaitis
    5D15-1002, 5D15-3069, 5D15-3187
    05/02/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct, (Volu-sia)


text:
    Pryor v. State
    5D16-2731
    05/02/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Seminole)


text:
    R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company v. Lewis
    5D16-1121
    05/02/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Volu-sia)


text:
    Randall v. State
    5D16-1249
    05/09/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bre-vard)

* Date of decision or date rehearing denied (if requested).

** Court or agency rendering decision appealed and citation (if reported).


text:
    Ranslow v. State
    5D16-312
    05/23/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bre-vard)


text:
    Raulerson v. State
    5D16-2384
    05/16/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Volu-sia)


text:
    Redinger v. U.S. Bank National Association for Yale Mortgage Loan Trust, Series 2007-1
    5D16-2397
    05/23/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Reid v. Department of Corrections
    5D16-2504
    05/02/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Osceola)


text:
    Ridley v. State
    5D17-290
    05/02/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bre-vard)


text:
    Rizzo v. Doe
    5D16-2802
    05/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Roberson v. State
    5D16-2908
    05/23/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bre-vard)


text:
    Roberts v. State
    5D16-3910
    05/30/2017
   Aff.

.Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Robinson v. Department of Corrections
    5D17-320
    05/23/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Marion)


text:
    Robinson v. State
    5D17-362
    05/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Rodriguez v. State
    5D17-1019
    05/19/2017
   Pet.gr.


text:
    Rodriguez v. State
    5D16-3761
    05/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Rood v. State
    5D16-3750
    05/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Citrus)


text:
    Rooks v. State
    5D15-4431
    05/02/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Seminole)


text:
    S.R. v. Department of Children and Families
    5D16-3792
    05/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (St. Johns)


text:
    Saavedra v. Bank of New York Mellon for Encore Credit Receivables Trust 2005-1
    5D16-2538
    05/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Sanders v. State
    5D16-1048
    05/16/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct, (Volu-sia)


text:
    School Board of Orange County v. Orange County Classroom Teachers Association
    5D16-3070
    05/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Seay v. State
    5D16-3640
    05/09/2017
   Aff,

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Shaikh v. U.S. Bank Trust, N.A.
    5D16-4007
    05/23/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Volu-sia)


text:
    Shaikh v. Wilmington Trust Company
    5D16-101
    05/31/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Smith v. State
    5D15-661
    05/16/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Fla-gler)


text:
    Smith v. State
    5D16-4431
    05/23/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Soriano v. State
    5D16-4384
    05/16/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Spencer v. State
    5D16-4399
    05/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Fla-gler)


text:
    Stanaland v. State
    5D16-5
    05/23/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (St. Johns)


text:
    Stanley v. State
    5D17-280
    05/23/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bre-vard)


text:
    Stanley v. State
    5D16-4459
    05/23/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Her-nando)


text:
    State v. Brown
    5D17-97
    05/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    State v. Tandy
    5D16-1642
    05/23/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Her-nando)


text:
    Stewart v. State
    5D16-3026
    05/23/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bre-vard)


text:
    Stockwell v. State
    5D16-4345
    05/16/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (St. Johns)


text:
    Sweat v. State
    5D16-3581
    05/23/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Seminole)


text:
    Thompson v. Department of Corrections
    5D16-4363
    05/09/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Marion)


text:
    Tinao v. HSBC Bank USA, National Association for Ace Securities Corp. Home Equity Loan Trust, Series 2006-OP2
    5D16-2937
    05/23/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Torres v. State
    5D17-1027
    05/23/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Her-nando)


text:
    Turner v. Bradley
    5D16-811
    05/23/2017
   Aff.-

Cir. Ct. (Bre-vard)


text:
    Turner v. State
    5D17-498
    05/09/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Seminole)


text:
    Valentin-Rodriguez v. State
    5D17-368
    06/26/2017
   Aff.; Remanded

Cir. Ct. (Osceola)


text:
    Van Auken v. State
    5D17-656
    06/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Her-nando)


text:
    Vega v. State
    5D17-722
    05/16/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Citrus)


text:
    Viau v. State
    5D16-757
    05/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Marion)


text:
    Villasol Community Development District v. TC 12, LLC
    5D16-774
    06/08/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Osceola)


text:
    Walls v. State
    5D16-1075
    05/23/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Volu-sia)


text:
    Washington v. Countrywide Home Loans
    5D16-2859
    05/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Watts v. State
    5D17-809
    05/16/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Weathers v. State
    5D17-1005
    05/23/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Citrus)


text:
    West v. State
    5D16-3970
    05/16/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Marion)


text:
    West v. State
    5D16-3335
    05/23/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Orange)


text:
    Westman v. State
    5D16-2007
    05/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Marion)


text:
    Wheeler v. State
    5D15-2958
    05/02/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Osceola)


text:
    Wideman v. State
    5D16-2317
    08/03/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (St. Johns)


text:
    Williams v. State
    5D17-162
    05/02/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Citrus)


text:
    Williams v. State
    5D16-2355
    06/07/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Lake)


text:
    Williams v. State
    5D17-969
    05/12/2017
   Pet.gr.


text:
    Williams v. State
    5D17-323
    05/09/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Marion)


text:
    Williams v. State
    5D16-709
    05/23/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (St. Johns)


text:
    Williamson v. State
    5D16-3866
    05/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bre-vard)


text:
    Wilson v. State
    5D16-1718
    05/02/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Marion)


text:
    Wilson v. State
    5D16-1096
    05/16/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Citrus)


text:
    Withey v. US Bank, N.A. for Truman 2013 SC4 Title Trust
    5D16-1910
    05/30/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Volu-sia)


text:
    Wolfgang v. 2005 Ford Super Duty F-250 Truck VIN No. 1FTSW20P45EB16974, Tag No. 450VJA by Dawsy
    5D16-2636
    06/02/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Citrus)


text:
    Wood v. State
    5D17-879
    06/05/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Bre-vard)


text:
    Wood v. State
    5D17-223
    05/23/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Citrus)


text:
    Wright v. State
    5D15-4402
    05/23/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Citrus)


text:
    Yermal v. State
    5D16-4433
    06/28/2017
   Aff.

Cir. Ct. (Citrus)


author: Pet Curiam.

text:
    Duroy HENDERSON and Marilyn Henderson,, Appellants, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, Appellee
    No. 4D16-382
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [July 5, 2017]
    James A. Bonfiglio of Law Offices of James A. Bonfiglio, P.A., Boynton Beach, and Philip M, Burlington and Adam Richardson of Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellants.
    Jason H. Okleshen of Greenberg Trau-rig, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   Pet Curiam.

Affirmed. See Nationstar Mortg. LLC v. Glass, No. 4D15-4561, 219 So.3d 896, 2017 WL 2664696 (Fla. 4th DCA June 21, 2017) (en banc).

Warner, Levine and Forst, JJ., concur.


author: Gerber, C.J. Ciklin, J.,

text:
    TRANSCAPITAL BANK, a Florida Bank; The Palms I of Vero Beach, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company; Leonard E. Zedeck, an Individual; and William E. Himes, an Individual, Appellants, v. SHADOWBROOK AT VERO, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company; John Q. Naimi a/k/a Hossein Moh Naimi, Individually; DJS Enterprises, LLC; and Palm Beach Group Investment, Inc., Appellees.
    No. 4D14-4650
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [July 26, 2017]

      Hinda Klein of Conroy Simberg, Hollywood, for appellants.
    Richard H. Bergman and Harrison T. Bergman of Bergman & Jacobs; P.A., Hollywood, for appellant Transcapital Bank.
    Robin Bresky and Jonathan Mann of the Law Offices of Robin Bresky, Boca Raton, for appellees,
   Gerber, C.J.

The seller of condominium units (and the seller’s related representatives) appeal from an order granting the buyer’s motion for new trial on the buyer’s claims for fraud (count I) and combined claim for conversion and civil theft (count II). The seller and its representatives primarily argue that the trial court should have granted their motion for directed verdict on both counts. We agree with the seller and its representatives, and therefore reverse for entry of judgment in their favor on both counts. We also reverse for entry of judgment on the seller’s counterclaim for breach of guaranty against the buyer’s representative.

Procedural History

This case arose from a transaction in which the buyer, co-plaintiff Shadowbrook, purchased 123 condominium units, out of a total of 164 units in the project, from the seller, co-defendant Transcapital.

To complete the purchase, Shadowbrook agreed to assume a prior owner’s loans on the 123 units totaling $10,934,700, in exchange for which Shadowbrook provided Transcapital a mortgage on the units.

As part of the transaction, Transcapital also loaned Shadowbrook an additional $700,000 as a line of credit, of which $150,000 could be used for renovations and the remainder used for loan payments on the primary loan during the renovations.

The note for the $700,000 loan was signed by Shadowbrook’s principal, co-plaintiff John Naimi, on behalf of co-plaintiffs DJS Enterprises and Palm Beach Group Investment.

Naimi had agreed to the transaction following conversations with Transcapital’s president, co-defendant William Himes, and Transcapital’s general counsel, co-defendant Leonard Zedeck. Naimi formed Shadowbrook just before the closing as the entity taking title to the units.

As part of the transaction, Naimi gave Transcapital a personal guaranty in the amount of $1 million. Another of Naimi’s companies, co-plaintiff DJS Enterprises, paid $8,500 for an appraisal fee.

After the closing, Shadowbrook began renovating the units, but ran out of money. Naimi went to Transcapital, which loaned him an additional $400,000, with a second mortgage on his Maryland home as collateral.

Unfortunately, Shadowbrook and Naimi defaulted on the mortgages.

Before Transcapital could sue Shadow-brook and Naimi for defaulting on the mortgages, Shadowbrook, Naimi, DJS Enterprises, and Palm Beach Group Investment sued Transcapital, Himes, and Ze-deck. In the operative complaint, all of the plaintiffs sued all the defendants for fraud (count I). Shadowbrook and Naimi also sued defendants Transcapital, Zedeck and Himes in the combined claim of conversion and civil theft (count II). All of the plaintiffs also sued all of the defendants for breach of fiduciary duty (count III).

The plaintiffs’ fraud claim alleged that the plaintiffs were misled about the property’s value and the existence of an appraisal allegedly valuing the property at over $90,000 per unit, when, according to the plaintiffs, the units were worth substantially less. The combined conversion and civil theft claim alleged that although an $8,500 appraisal fee was charged at the closing, no appraisal was performed. The breach of fiduciary duty claim alleged that the defendants owed the plaintiffs a fiduciary duty based on the parties’ prior dealings in earlier transactions, and breached that fiduciary duty by misleading the plaintiffs into purchasing the 123 units.

After the plaintiffs sued the defendants, Transcapital counterclaimed to foreclose on the mortgages and recover on Naimi’s personal guaranty.

The Trial

The case resulted in a multi-week jury trial on the plaintiffs’ claims and Transca-pital’s counterclaim for Naimi’s alleged breach of the guaranty. The court also agreed to simultaneously consider Tran-scapital’s counterclaim to foreclose on the mortgages.

At trial, co-plaintiff Naimi testified that he had been building homes and investing in real estate for some time, and previously had obtained financing from Transcapi-tal for his endeavors. In early 2008, Naimi was approached by Himes, with whom Naimi had prior dealings, about a “very interesting project in Vero Beach.” Although Naimi was not interested at first, he viewed some of the units in the subject 164-unit condominium project and ultimately decided to go forward with the transaction.

Naimi testified Himes and Zedeck told Naimi that Transcapital was offering him a great deal and he would make a lot of money. The proposal was that Naimi, via Shadowbrook, would purchase 123 of the units, and Transcapital would retain twenty units. Zedeck previously had purchased five units from the prior owner at $95,000 per unit. The remaining units were owned by unrelated parties.

According to Naimi, during a meeting before the closing, Zedeck pointed to an unidentified paper and said that the property had been appraised for $14.8 million. Naimi testified that because the property was being offered to him at $10.9 million, he believed he had a “big cushion.” Even though Naimi was represented by counsel who reviewed all of the closing documents before closing, Naimi testified he was never given a copy of the appraisal, and he signed the contract and closed the transaction without having received the appraisal or directing anyone to perform an appraisal.

On cross examination, Naimi admitted that although he was told the appraised value of the entire property was $14.8 million, he also was specifically shown two prior notes from the prior owner in the aggregate amount of $14.8 million, and the appraisal could have been for all 164 units. Naimi further admitted that because Sha-dowbrook was purchasing only 123 of the units, the price per unit worked out the same:

DEFENSE COUNSEL: And the one page you looked at was a note for 14.8 million dollars, correct?
NAIMI: Correct.
DEFENSE COUNSEL: And that note for 14.8 million dollars is attached as Exhibit 1A, which is the membership purchase agreement and. related documents that you signed on April 15, 2008, correct?
NAIMI: Right.
DEFENSE COUNSEL: ... The note for 14.8 million represented the note on 164 units?
NAIMI: I don’t know sir.
DEFENSE COUNSEL: Let’s do some math here. If you take 14.8 million and you divide by 164, what do you get? Do you know?
NAIMI: No, sir.
DEFENSE COUNSEL: Okay. If you take 10.9 and you divide by 123, what do you get? ;i
NAIMI: 89,900.
DEFENSE COUNSEL: Right. Which is just about what you get when you divide 14.8 by 164, right?
NAIMI: I guess.

In fact, the $14.8 million in notes referenced above (two notes of $7.4 million each), which were shown to Naimi before the closing, were the notes signed by the prior owner for all 164 units of the property. Both of those notes, as well as all of the loan documents executed by the prior owner, were attached and made part of the Membership Purchase Agreement which Naimi signed.

Naimi admitted that he had every opportunity to consult with professionals before the purchase. Additionally, although Naimi had every opportunity to inspect all units prior to the closing, he inspected only a handful, some of which he noted were in “horrible condition”. and unlivable, while others were just “okay.”

Co-defendant Himes testified that the project’s prior owner defaulted on its loans from Transcapital. -Those loans' were assumed by Shadowbrook, and all of the documentation concerning the assumed loans were attached to the Membership Purchase Agreement which Naimi signed. Himes also testified that he gave Naimi every appraisal which Transcapital had for the entire 164-unit project, including an appraisal for $16 million performed two years before the closing. ,

As for the $8,500 appraisal charge which Shadowbrook paid to Transcapital at the closing, Himes - testified that the charge was a mistake. Himes testified that although an appraisal is usually required by a mortgagee on new loans, it was unnecessary here because Shadowbrook assumed an existing loan from the project’s prior owner. Zedeck, who acted as the closing agent on- the transaction, testified that he charged the $8,500 appraisal fee at closing at Transcapital’s direction. Zedeck testified he was unaware that the appraisal had not been obtained. It was undisputed that neither Himes nor Zedeck received' the $8,500 which was charged to Shadowbrook.

At the close of the plaintiffs’ case, the defendants moved for directed verdict on all of the plaintiffs’ claims. As to the plaintiffs’ fraud claim, the defendants argued that property value is an opinion and an opinion cannot form the basis for a fraud claim. As to the plaintiffs’ combined conversion and civil theft claim, the defendants argued, among other reasons, no evidence existed of criminal intent regarding the $8,500 charge at closing, these causes of action do not apply when the dealings are contractual, and, in any event, Himes and Zedeck did not receive the $8,500. As to the plaintiffs’ breach of fiduciary duty claim, the defendants argued no evidence existed that the defendants were in a position of trust with the plaintiffs. The court reserved ruling on the motion for directed verdict.

Transcapital, as counterplaintiff, then presented its case for Naimi’s breach of the guaranty. Naimi identified the $1 million guaranty, and testified that he signed it. He further testified that Shadowbrook failed to make payments on the loan and stopped paying real estate taxes on the property. Transcapital introduced into evidence a damage summary detailing all damages owed, included payments for principal and interest, real estate taxes, reimbursement for redemption of tax certificates, and insurance. Transcapital also introduced the notice of default.

Naimi’s primary defense to the breach of guaranty counterclaim was that if the jury found fraud as alleged in the plaintiffs’ claim, then the breach of guaranty counterclaim would not be enforceable.

After Transcapital rested and the plaintiffs presented rebuttal evidence, the defendants renewed their motion for directed verdict on the plaintiffs claims. Transcapi-tal also moved for a directed verdict on its breach of guaranty counterclaim. The court reserved ruling on the motions.

The jury’s verdict was mixed. On the plaintiffs’ fraud claim, the jury found that the defendants committed fraud, but also found that the plaintiffs released the fraud claim (based on facts not pertinent to this opinion). On the plaintiffs’ combined conversion and civil theft claim, the jury found for the plaintiffs. However, on the plaintiffs’ breach of fiduciary duty claim, the jury found for the defendants. On Transca-pital’s counterclaim that Naimi breached his guaranty, the jury found for Transcapi-tal.

The Post-Trial Motions

After the trial, the defendants renewed all of their directed verdict motions made at trial.'

On the plaintiffs’ fraud claim, the defendants argued that representations of property value are considered “opinion” and thus are not representations of material fact necessary to support a fraud claim. The defendants further argued that, even if any of them had' misrepresented the property’s value, such á representation would not be actionable under the doctrine of caveat emptor, absent evidence that the defendants prevented the plaintiffs from examining the property themselves. The defendants further argued, in light of the jury’s finding that the defendants did not breach a fiduciary duty to the plaintiffs, no special relationship existed which would make caveat emptor inapplicable.

On the plaintiffs’ combined conversion and civil theft claim, the defendants argued: no evidence existed of felonious intent by any defendant; unsegregated funds cannot form the basis of conversion or civil theft; the failure to comply with a contract cannot form the basis of conversion or civil theft; and Himes and Zedeck were entitled to judgment because they did not receive the $8,500 charged for the appraisal at closing.

The plaintiffs filed their own post-trial motions, including a motion for new trial which primarily argued the court erred in allowing the jury to make a finding that the plaintiffs released their fraud claim.

The trial court denied all post-trial motions except for the plaintiffs’ motion for new trial on the release of fraud argument, which the court granted. The court ruled that a new trial should be held not only on the plaintiffs’ fraud claim and combined conversion and civil theft claim, but also on Transcapital’s counterclaim against Naimi for breach of guaranty.

The Appeal

This appeal followed. The defendants primarily argue the trial court erred in denying their motions for directed verdict as to the plaintiffs’ fraud claim and combined conversion and civil theft claim. Our review is de novo. See Kopel v. Kopel, 229 So.3d 812, 2017 WL 372074 (Fla. Jan. 26, 2017) (“An order on a motion for directed verdict or for judgment notwithstanding the verdict is reviewed de novo.”) (citation omitted).

We agree with the defendants that the trial court erred in denying them motions for directed verdict. We discuss our reasoning further below. The plaintiffs also filed a cross-appeal, which we conclude, without further discussion, lacks merit. Thus, this opinion shall discuss only our reasoning for why the trial court should have granted the defendants’ motions for directed verdict on each of the plaintiffs’ claims, which we address in turn.

1. The Plaintiffs’ Fraud Claim

On the plaintiffs’ fraud claim, because this was a commercial transaction, the doctrine of caveat emptor, or let the buyer beware, is applicable. See Wasser v. Sasoni, 652 So.2d 411, 412 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995) (“[T]he doctrine of caveat emptor, or ‘buyer beware,’ is still the common law rule applied to purchasers of commercial property.”). “This doctrine places the duty to examine and'judge the value and condition of the property solely on the buyer and protects the seller from liability for any defects.” Turnberry Court Corp. v. Bellini, 962 So.2d 1006, 1007 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (citation omitted).

“Exceptions [to the doctrine of caveat emptor] arise: 1) where some artifice or trick has been employed to prevent the purchaser from making independent inquiry; 2) where the other party does not have equal opportunity to become apprised of the fact; and, 3) where a party undertakes to disclose facts and fails to disclose the whole truth.” Green Acres, Inc. v. First Union Nat’l Bank of Fla., 637 So.2d 363, 364 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994) (citation omitted).

We conclude that, applying the doctrine of caveat emptor to this transaction, the plaintiffs’ fraud claim could not survive a motion for directed verdict. None of the exceptions to caveat emptor apply. Sha-dowbrook, through Naimi, admitted that he had every opportunity to consult with professionals before the purchase. Shadow-brook also had a full and fair opportunity to investigate all aspects of the property, including its value. For example, although Naimi had the opportunity to inspect all units before the closing, he inspected only a handful, some of which he noted were in “horrible condition” and unlivable, while others were just “okay.” Based on these observations, Shadowbrook could have obtained its own appraisal. Instead, Shadow-brook closed on the transaction knowing that it had not received a copy of any appraisal, and had not viewed a copy of the appraisal which Naimi alleged was referred to during the negotiations.

The case upon which the plaintiffs primarily rely, Najera v. NationsBank Trust Co., 707 So.2d 1153 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998), is distinguishable based on its contrasting procedural posture to this case. Najera came to our sister court on appeal from an order granting the lender’s motion for summary judgment where the borrower had raised a defense of fraudulent inducement. Id. at 1155. Our sister court reversed because “the allegations and record create[d] issues of fact concerning whether [the borrowers] relied upon the existence of a professional appraisal to support the loan values, and whether they would have entered into this transaction had those representations not been made.” Id. Similarly here, a genuine issue of material fact existed before trial as to whether the defendants misrepresented the existence of an appraisal.

But a motion for directed verdict goes beyond whether a genuine issue of material fact exists. “A trial court should grant a motion for directed verdict when the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, shows that a jury could not reasonably differ about the existence of a material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Meruelo v. Mark Andrew of Palm Beaches, Ltd., 12 So.3d 247, 250 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) (citation omitted).

Here, the defendants were entitled to a judgment as a matter of law on' the plaintiffs’ fraud claim. Even if any of the defendants had misrepresented the property’s appraised value, such a misrepresentation would not be actionable under the doctrine of caveat emptor in the absence of evidence that the defendants resorted “to some fraudulent means in preventing a prospective purchaser from making an examination of the property under consideration.” Farnham v. Blount, 152 Fla. 208, 11 So.2d 785, 790 (1942) (citation omitted). The plaintiffs presented no such evidence here.

Although an exception exists to the foregoing where the seller has a fiduciary duty to the buyer and breached that duty, see Glass v. Craig, 83 Fla. 408, 91 So. 332, 335 (1922), that exception does not apply here. In this case, the jury found in the defendants’ favor on the plaintiffs’ breach of fiduciary duty claim.

In addition to the foregoing, the evidence presented at trial belied the plaintiffs’ allegation that the defendants had misrepresented the property’s appraised value. On cross examination, Naimi admitted that although he was told the appraised value of the entire property was $14.8 million, he also was specifically shown two prior notes from the prior owner in the aggregate amount of $14.8 million, and the appraisal could have been for all 164 units. Naimi further admitted that becaúse Shadowbrook was purchasing only 123 of the units, the price per unit worked out the same.

In fact, the $14.8 million in notes referenced above (two notes of $7.4 million each), which were shown to Naimi before the closing, were the notes signed by the prior owners for all 164 units of the property. Both of those notes, as well as all of the loan documents executed by the prior owners, were attached and made part of the Membership Purchase Agreement which Naimi signed.

Based on the foregoing, the defendants were entitled to a directed verdict on the plaintiffs’ fraud claim.

2. The Plaintiffs’ Combined Conversion and Civil Theft Claim

On the plaintiffs’ combined conversion and civil theft claim, the defendants also were entitled to judgment as a matter of law for four reasons.

First, “an action for conversion of money can only be maintained where the money at issue has been kept separate.” Rupp v. Schon, 608 So.2d 934, 985 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992) (citation omitted). Here, the $8,500 for the appraisal was paid in a check with other closing funds, and the plaintiffs presented no evidence that the $8,500 was kept separate from the other closing funds.

Second, for a viable claim to exist for conversion or civil theft when the parties have a contractual relationship, “the civil theft or conversion must go beyond, and be independent from, a failure to comply with the terms of a contract.” Gasparini v. Pordomingo, 972 So.2d 1053, 1055 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (citation omitted). Here, the plaintiffs presented no evidence of any action which went beyond, or was independent from, the contract. The plaintiffs ' merely contended that they were charged for an appraisal which they did not receive, which would be nothing more than a breach of contract.

Third, “[t]o establish a claim for civil theft, a party must prove that a conversion has taken place and that the accused party acted with criminal intent.” Heldenmuth v. Groll, 128 So.3d 895, 896 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (citation omitted). Such intent must be proven by dear and convincing evidence. Westinghouse Elec. Corp. v. Shuler Bros., Inc., 590 So.2d 986, 988 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). Here, the plaintiffs presented no evidence of any criminal intent of the defendants, much less clear and convincing evidence of any such intent. Instead, the evidence showed that charging $8,500 for a non-existent appraisal, as part of a $10.9 million transaction, was more likely a mere mistake.

Fourth, a party which does not personally receive property which is the subject of an alleged conversion or civil theft cannot be held liable for such action. See Rupp, 608 So.2d at 935 (even if the plaintiff had a valid claim for conversion, such claim could be asserted against only the corporation which received the plaintiffs property, not the individual who was the corporation’s sole shareholder, because the individual did not personally receive the property). Here, the evidence showed that only Transcapital received the $8,500 at issue. The plaintiffs presented no evidence that Himes or Zedeck personally received the $8,500 at issue. Although Ze-deck had temporary possession of the $8,500 as the escrow agent, an escrow agent can be responsible for conversion only if the escrow agent has put some of the escrowed funds towards personal use. Cf. Heldenmuth, 128 So.3d at 896-97 (purchaser of real property stated a claim for civil theft against escrow agents by alleging that escrow agents used some of the escrow funds which the purchaser delivered solely to purchase real property for the escrow agents’ own use). .The plaintiffs presented no evidence that Zedeck put any of the $8,500 towards personal use. Thus, both Himes and. Zedeck were entitled to a directed verdict on the combined conversion and civil theft claim.

Conclusion

Given that the defendants were entitled to directed verdicts on the plaintiffs’ fraud claim and combined conversion and civil theft claim, no justification exists for a new trial on Transcapital’s counterclaim against Naimi for breach of the guaranty. The amount due on the counterclaim was undisputed, Transcapital proved the default, and no trial errors occurred in connection with the counterclaim.

The plaintiffs’ only argument in defense of the guaranty was that if the plaintiffs committed fraud, then it would negate the guaranty. ■ However, because a directed verdict was proper on the plaintiffs’ fraud claim, Transcapital is entitled to judgment on Naimi’s breach of the guaranty, including interest from the date of default when Shadowbrook stopped paying down the loan and stopped paying real estate taxes.

Based on the foregoing, we reverse the trial court’s order granting the plaintiffs’ motion for new trial on the plaintiffs’ fraud count and combined conversion and civil theft count. We remand for entry of a directed verdict and final judgment in the defendants’ favor on both counts. We also remand for entry of final judgment in Transcapital’s favor on Transcapital’s counterclaim against Naimi for breach of his guaranty. Finally, although the trial court did not render judgment on Transca-pital’s foreclosure counterclaims which the court considered non-jury, we would expect that, consistent with our conclusions, the trial court will enter final judgment in Transcapital’s favor on Transcapital’s foreclosure counterclaims against Shadow-brook and Naimi.

Reversed and remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Damoorgian, J., concurs.

Ciklin, J., concurs in part and dissents in part with opinion.

Ciklin, J.,

concurring in part and dissenting in part.

I concur in the majority’s determination that the trial court erred in not entering a directed verdict on the conversion and civil theft claims. Otherwise, I respectfully dissent.

This appeal arises from the trial court’s grant of new trial based in part on its determination that the jury arrived at an improper compromise verdict. Indeed, the verdict form gave rise to a suggestion of compromise: the jury awarded damages on Naimi’s fraud claim even though the jury found in favor of the defense by accepting an affirmative defense it had raised. The amount awarded was almost equal to the award on Transcapital’s breach of guaranty counterclaim, after the jury inexplicably found the default date on the guaranty was the date of trial, thus removing the need to award prejudgment interest.

“When reviewing the order granting a new trial, an appellate court must recognize the broad discretionary authority of the trial judge and apply the reasonableness test to determine whether the trial judge committed an abuse of discretion.” Thigpen v, United Parcel Servs., Inc., 990 So.2d 639, 644 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (quoting Brown v. Estate of A.P. Stuckey, 749 So.2d 490, 497-98 (Fla. 1999)). “Moreover, a stronger showing has usually been required to reverse an order allowing a new trial than to reverse an order denying a motion for new trial.” Id. at 645. Based on the verdict form and the record as a whole, I find it difficult to conclude that the trial court abused its discretion in granting a new trial based on improper jury compromise. See Street v. H.R. Mortg. & Realty Co., 949 So.2d 1158, 1162 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (recognizing that “case law does not require actual proof that the jury did compromise its verdict,” and that it is enough if there is “ ‘some suggestion’ that the jury may have compromised on the verdict in light of the ‘hotly contested evidence of liability1 and the jury’s decision to give just a small award of damages” (citation omitted)).

Against this backdrop, I respectfully dissent with respect to Naimi’s fraud claim. The crux of his claim was that the defendants tricked him by charging him and collecting payment for an appraisal that was never performed, and then by asserting that this nonexistent appraisal valued the property Naimi was purchasing at more than $14.8 million, much more than its worth.

I believe there was minimally sufficient evidence for the jury to determine the merits of the claim. Naimi testified that after decades in the nightclub business, he became involved in real estate investing in 2001. He began by purchasing lots for the construction of single-family homes. In 2005, he obtained financing for construction of four of the homes from Transcapital after meeting with Himes. Around the same time, Himes and Zedeck assisted him in obtaining a loan from Transcapital for DJS Enterprises to purchase a home in Palm Beach County. In 2007, Naimi obtained financing from Transcapital in relation to three parcels of land owned by DJS Enterprises. He did not have representation at any of the closings related to the purchases by DJS Enterprises; instead, Zedeck handled all of the closing documents.

Naimi testified that in 2008, Himes suggested that Naimi take a look at the condominium in Vero Beach. Naimi was not interested but Himes called him repeatedly. After touring the property, Naimi met with Himes and Zedeck. Himes and Ze-deck represented that they were going to “keep” twenty condominium units “for [Transcapital],” that Zedeck would “have five unit[s] himself,” and that Transcapital and Naimi would essentially be involved in a “partnership” and “make a lot of money together.” Naimi testified that Zedeck told him the appraisal for 123 units came in at more than $14.8 million. There was no such appraisal and it was undisputed that an appraisal was never performed even though Naimi was required to pay for an appraisal.

The majority contends that the principles of caveat emptor apply in this matter and Naimi therefore is without recourse. In my opinion, the evidence was sufficient for the jury to determine whether “some artifice or trick has been employed to prevent the purchaser from making independent inquiry.” Green Acres, Inc., 637 So.2d at 364. Here, there was evidence that Himes and Zedeck indicated they were also investing in the property, that they were all going to make a lot of money together, and that Zedeck represented that 123 units were appraised at more than $14.8 million, well over their true worth. This evidence, coupled with evidence that Transcapital collected an appraisal fee from Naimi even though no appraisal was ever performed, was more than sufficient for the jury to determine the merits of the fraud claim.

The majority also asserts that any evidence of a fiduciary relationship between the parties could not be considered by the trial court in determining the motion for directed verdict on the fraud claim because, the majority reasons, the jury found for the defense on the breach of fiduciary duty count. I disagree.

The trial court, being in the front row of the courtroom, was in the best position to determine if the jury’s entire verdict could not stand, in light of its finding of -an improper jury compromise. Accordingly, the trial court was free to consider the evidence related to a fiduciary relationship between the parties in determining whether it should grant a directed verdict on the fraud count. The majority usurps the trial court’s broad authority and discretion to act as it did. The trial court was in a superior position to determine if a new trial was warranted in this case and that is precisely what it concluded. I would not undercut the trial court’s prerogative in that regard and therefore I respectfully dissent.