text:
    Konstantinos X. FOTOPOULOS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. SC17-971
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    [January 29, 2018]
    James Vincent Viggiano, Jr., Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, James L. Driscoll, Jr., David Dixon Hendry, and Gregory W. Brown, Assistant Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Middle Region, Temple Terrace, Florida, for Appellant
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, and Leslie T. Campbell, Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, Florida, for Appellee
   PER CURIAM.

We have for review Konstantinos X. Fotopoulos's appeal of the circuit court's order denying Fotopoulos's motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851. This Court has jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const.

Fotopoulos's motion sought relief pursuant to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Hurst v. Florida, --- U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016), and our decision on remand in Hurst v. State (Hurst ), 202 So.3d 40 (Fla. 2016), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 2161, 198 L.Ed.2d 246 (2017). This Court stayed Fotopoulos's appeal pending the disposition of Hitchcock v. State, 226 So.3d 216 (Fla. 2017), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017). After this Court decided Hitchcock, Fotopoulos responded to this Court's order to show cause arguing why Hitchcock should not be dispositive in this case.

After reviewing Fotopoulos's response to the order to show cause, as well as the State's arguments in reply, we conclude that Fotopoulos is not entitled to relief. Fotopoulos's jury found him guilty of two counts of first-degree murder and recommended a sentence of death for both murders by a vote of eight to four. Fotopoulos v. State, 608 So.2d 784, 787 (Fla. 1992). Following the jury's recommendations, the trial court sentenced Fotopoulos to death on both counts. Id. Fotopoulos's sentences of death became final in 1993. Fotopoulos v. Florida, 508 U.S. 924, 113 S.Ct. 2377, 124 L.Ed.2d 282 (1993). Thus, Hurst does not apply retroactively to Fotopoulos's sentences of death. See Hitchcock, 226 So.3d at 217. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Fotopoulos's motion.

The Court having carefully considered all arguments raised by Fotopoulos, we caution that any rehearing motion containing reargument will be stricken. It is so ordered.

LABARGA, C.J., and QUINCE, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

PARIENTE, J., concurs in result with an opinion.

LEWIS and CANADY, JJ., concur in result.

PARIENTE, J., concurring in result.

I concur in result because I recognize that this Court's opinion in Hitchcock v. State, 226 So.3d 216 (Fla. 2017), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017), is now final. However, I continue to adhere to the views expressed in my dissenting opinion in Hitchcock.

      Although our decision affirming Fotopoulos's death sentences does not specify the number of Fotopoulos's jurors who voted to recommend death, he represents in his response to this Court's order to show cause that the jury recommended death for both murders by a vote of eight to four. Resp. to Order to Show Cause, Fotopoulos v. State, No. SC17-971, 2017 WL 4791738, at 2 (Fla. Oct. 17, 2017).


source: Caselaw Access Project

author: PER CURIAM.

license: Public Domain

text:
    Bruce Douglas PACE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. SC17-1021
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    [January 30, 2018]
    Neal Dupree, Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Bri Lacy, Staff Attorney, and Paul Kalil, Assistant Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Southern Region, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, for Appellant
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Lisa A. Hopkins, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, for Appellee
   PER CURIAM.

We have for review Bruce Douglas Pace's appeal of the circuit court's order denying Pace's motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851. This Court has jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const.

Pace's motion sought relief pursuant to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Hurst v. Florida, --- U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016), and our decision on remand in Hurst v. State (Hurst ), 202 So.3d 40 (Fla. 2016), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 2161, 198 L.Ed.2d 246 (2017). This Court stayed Pace's appeal pending the disposition of Hitchcock v. State, 226 So.3d 216 (Fla. 2017), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017). After this Court decided Hitchcock, Pace responded to this Court's order to show cause arguing why Hitchcock should not be dispositive in this case.

After reviewing Pace's response to the order to show cause, as well as the State's arguments in reply, we conclude that Pace is not entitled to relief. Pace was sentenced to death following a jury's recommendation for death by a vote of seven to five. See Pace v. State, 596 So.2d 1034, 1035 (Fla. 1992). His sentence of death became final in 1992. Pace v. Florida, 506 U.S. 885, 113 S.Ct. 244, 121 L.Ed.2d 178 (1992). Thus, Hurst does not apply retroactively to Pace's sentence of death. See Hitchcock, 226 So.3d at 217. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Pace's motion.

The Court having carefully considered all arguments raised by Pace, we caution that any rehearing motion containing reargument will be stricken. It is so ordered.

LABARGA, C.J., and QUINCE, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

PARIENTE, J., concurs in result with an opinion.

LEWIS and CANADY, JJ., concur in result.

PARIENTE, J., concurring in result.

I concur in result because I recognize that this Court's opinion in Hitchcock v. State, 226 So.3d 216 (Fla. 2017), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017), is now final. However, I continue to adhere to the views expressed in my dissenting opinion in Hitchcock.

      While the jury's vote to recommend a sentence of death is not reflected in this Court's opinion on direct appeal, this Court's opinion addressing Pace's initial postconviction appeal and separate petition for a writ of habeas corpus states that the jury voted seven to five to recommend a sentence of death. Pace v. State, 854 So.2d 167, 170 (Fla. 2003).


text:
    Anthony LAMARCA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. SC17-1179
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    [January 30, 2018]
    Linda McDermott of McClain & McDermott, P.A., Estero, Florida; James Vincent Viggiano, Jr., Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, and Ali A. Shakoor, Assistant Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Middle Region, Temple Terrace, Florida, for Appellant
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, and Scott A. Browne, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, Florida, for Appellee
   PER CURIAM.

We have for review Anthony Lamarca's appeal of the circuit court's order denying Lamarca's motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851. This Court has jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const.

Lamarca's motion sought relief pursuant to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Hurst v. Florida, --- U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016), and our decision on remand in Hurst v. State (Hurst ), 202 So.3d 40 (Fla. 2016), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 2161, 198 L.Ed.2d 246 (2017). This Court stayed Lamarca's appeal pending the disposition of Hitchcock v. State, 226 So.3d 216 (Fla. 2017), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017). After this Court decided Hitchcock, Lamarca responded to this Court's order to show cause arguing why Hitchcock should not be dispositive in this case.

After reviewing Lamarca's response to the order to show cause, as well as the State's arguments in reply, we conclude that Lamarca is not entitled to relief. Lamarca was sentenced to death following a jury's recommendation for death by a vote of eleven to one. LaMarca v. State, 785 So.2d 1209, 1211 (Fla. 2001). Lamarca's sentence of death became final in 2001. LaMarca v. Florida, 534 U.S. 925, 122 S.Ct. 281, 151 L.Ed.2d 207 (2001). Thus, Hurst does not apply retroactively to Lamarca's sentence of death. See Hitchcock, 226 So.3d at 217. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Lamarca's motion.

The Court having carefully considered all arguments raised by Lamarca, we caution that any rehearing motion containing reargument will be stricken. It is so ordered.

LABARGA, C.J., and QUINCE, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

PARIENTE, J., concurs in result with an opinion.

LEWIS and CANADY, JJ., concur in result.

PARIENTE, J., concurring in result.

I concur in result because I recognize that this Court's opinion in Hitchcock v. State, 226 So.3d 216 (Fla. 2017), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017), is now final. However, I continue to adhere to the views expressed in my dissenting opinion in Hitchcock.


text:
    Anton J. KRAWCZUK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. SC17-1142
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    [January 31, 2018]
    Neal Dupree, Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Todd G. Scher and Scott Gavin, Assistant Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Southern Region, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, for Appellant
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, and Stephen D. Ake, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, Florida, for Appellee
   PER CURIAM.

We have for review Anton J. Krawczuk's appeal of the circuit court's order denying Krawczuk's motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851. This Court has jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const.

Krawczuk's motion sought relief pursuant to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Hurst v. Florida, --- U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016), and our decision on remand in Hurst v. State (Hurst ), 202 So.3d 40 (Fla. 2016), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 2161, 198 L.Ed.2d 246 (2017). This Court stayed Krawczuk's appeal pending the disposition of Hitchcock v. State, 226 So.3d 216 (Fla. 2017), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017). After this Court decided Hitchcock, Krawczuk responded to this Court's order to show cause arguing why Hitchcock should not be dispositive in this case.

After reviewing Krawczuk's response to the order to show cause, as well as the State's arguments in reply, we conclude that Krawczuk is not entitled to relief. Krawczuk was sentenced to death following a jury's unanimous recommendation for death. Krawczuk v. State, 634 So.2d 1070, 1072 (Fla. 1994). Krawczuk's sentence of death became final in 1994. Krawczuk v. Florida, 513 U.S. 881, 115 S.Ct. 216, 130 L.Ed.2d 143 (1994). Thus, Hurst does not apply retroactively to Krawczuk's sentence of death. See Hitchcock, 226 So.3d at 217. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Krawczuk's motion.

The Court having carefully considered all arguments raised by Krawczuk, we caution that any rehearing motion containing reargument will be stricken. It is so ordered.

LABARGA, C.J., and POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

PARIENTE, J., concurs in result with an opinion.

LEWIS and CANADY, JJ., concur in result.

QUINCE, J., recused.

PARIENTE, J., concurring in result.

I concur in result because I recognize that this Court's opinion in Hitchcock v. State, 226 So.3d 216 (Fla. 2017), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017), is now final. However, I continue to adhere to the views expressed in my dissenting opinion in Hitchcock.


text:
    Henry Perry SIRECI, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. SC17-1143
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    [January 31, 2018]
    James Vincent Viggiano, Jr., Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Julissa R. Fontán, Maria E. DeLiberato and Chelsea Shirley, Assistant Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Middle Region, Temple Terrace, Florida, for Appellant
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, and Scott A. Browne, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, Florida, for Appellee
   PER CURIAM.

We have for review Henry Perry Sireci's appeal of the circuit court's order denying Sireci's motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851. This Court has jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const.

Sireci's motion sought relief pursuant to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Hurst v. Florida, --- U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016), and our decision on remand in Hurst v. State (Hurst ), 202 So.3d 40 (Fla. 2016), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 2161, 198 L.Ed.2d 246 (2017). This Court stayed Sireci's appeal pending the disposition of Hitchcock v. State, 226 So.3d 216 (Fla. 2017), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017). After this Court decided Hitchcock, Sireci responded to this Court's order to show cause arguing why Hitchcock should not be dispositive in this case.

After reviewing Sireci's response to the order to show cause, as well as the State's arguments in reply, we conclude that Sireci is not entitled to relief. Sireci was sentenced to death following a jury's recommendation for death by a vote of eleven to one. Sireci v. State, 587 So.2d 450, 451-52 (Fla. 1991). Sireci's sentence of death became final in 1992. Sireci v. Florida, 503 U.S. 946, 112 S.Ct. 1500, 117 L.Ed.2d 639 (1992). Thus, Hurst does not apply retroactively to Sireci's sentence of death. See Hitchcock, 226 So.3d at 217. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Sireci's motion.

The Court having carefully considered all arguments raised by Sireci, we caution that any rehearing motion containing reargument will be stricken. It is so ordered.

LABARGA, C.J., and QUINCE, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

PARIENTE, J., concurs in result with an opinion.

LEWIS and CANADY, JJ., concur in result.

PARIENTE, J., concurring in result.

I concur in result because I recognize that this Court's opinion in Hitchcock v. State, 226 So.3d 216 (Fla. 2017), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017), is now final. However, I continue to adhere to the views expressed in my dissenting opinion in Hitchcock.


text:
    Manuel Antonio RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. SC17-1268
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    [January 31, 2018]
    Neal Dupree, Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Marta Jaszczolt, Staff Attorney, and Marie-Louise Samuels Parmer, Special Assistant Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Southern Region, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, for Appellant
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, and Melissa J. Roca, Assistant Attorney General, Miami, Florida, for Appellee
   PER CURIAM.

We have for review Manuel Antonio Rodriguez's appeal of the circuit court's order denying Rodriguez's motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851. This Court has jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const.

Rodriguez's motion sought relief pursuant to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Hurst v. Florida, --- U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016), and our decision on remand in Hurst v. State (Hurst ), 202 So.3d 40 (Fla. 2016), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 2161, 198 L.Ed.2d 246 (2017). This Court stayed Rodriguez's appeal pending the disposition of Hitchcock v. State, 226 So.3d 216 (Fla. 2017), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017). After this Court decided Hitchcock, Rodriguez responded to this Court's order to show cause arguing why Hitchcock should not be dispositive in this case.

After reviewing Rodriguez's response to the order to show cause, as well as the State's arguments in reply, we conclude that Rodriguez is not entitled to relief. A jury convicted Rodriguez of three counts of first-degree murder, and the trial court sentenced Rodriguez to death on each count after the jury unanimously recommended a sentence of death for each count. Rodriguez v. State, 753 So.2d 29, 35 (Fla. 2000). Rodriguez's sentences of death became final in 2000. Rodriguez v. Florida, 531 U.S. 859, 121 S.Ct. 145, 148 L.Ed.2d 96 (2000). Thus, Hurst does not apply retroactively to Rodriguez's sentences of death. See Hitchcock, 226 So.3d at 217. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Rodriguez's motion.

The Court having carefully considered all arguments raised by Rodriguez, we caution that any rehearing motion containing reargument will be stricken. It is so ordered.

LABARGA, C.J., and QUINCE, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

PARIENTE, J., concurs in result with an opinion.

LEWIS and CANADY, JJ., concur in result.

PARIENTE, J., concurring in result.

I concur in result because I recognize that this Court's opinion in Hitchcock v. State, 226 So.3d 216 (Fla. 2017), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017), is now final. However, I continue to adhere to the views expressed in my dissenting opinion in Hitchcock.


text:
    Steven Edward STEIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. SC17-1547
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    [January 31, 2018]
    Linda McDermott of McClain & McDermott, P.A., Estero, Florida, for Appellant
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Charmaine M. Millsaps, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, for Appellee
   PER CURIAM.

We have for review Steven Edward Stein's appeal of the circuit court's order denying Stein's motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851. This Court has jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const.

Stein's motion sought relief pursuant to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Hurst v. Florida, --- U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016), and our decision on remand in Hurst v. State (Hurst ), 202 So.3d 40 (Fla. 2016), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 2161, 198 L.Ed.2d 246 (2017). This Court stayed Stein's appeal pending the disposition of Hitchcock v. State, 226 So.3d 216 (Fla. 2017), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017). After this Court decided Hitchcock, Stein responded to this Court's order to show cause arguing why Hitchcock should not be dispositive in this case.

After reviewing Stein's response to the order to show cause, as well as the State's arguments in reply, we conclude that Stein is not entitled to relief. A jury convicted Stein of two counts of first-degree murder and recommended a sentence of death for both murders by a vote of ten to two. Stein v. State, 632 So.2d 1361, 1364 (Fla. 1994). Stein's sentences of death became final in 1994. Stein v. Florida, 513 U.S. 834, 115 S.Ct. 111, 130 L.Ed.2d 58 (1994). Thus, Hurst does not apply retroactively to Stein's sentences of death. See Hitchcock, 226 So.3d at 217. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Stein's motion.

The Court having carefully considered all arguments raised by Stein, we caution that any rehearing motion containing reargument will be stricken. It is so ordered.

LABARGA, C.J., and QUINCE, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

PARIENTE, J., concurs in result with an opinion.

LEWIS and CANADY, JJ., concur in result.

PARIENTE, J., concurring in result.

I concur in result because I recognize that this Court's opinion in Hitchcock v. State, 226 So.3d 216 (Fla. 2017), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017), is now final. However, I continue to adhere to the views expressed in my dissenting opinion in Hitchcock.


text:
    David MILLER, Jr., Petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, etc., Respondent.
    No. SC17-1211
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    [January 31, 2018]
    Christopher J. Anderson of Law Office of Christopher J. Anderson, Neptune Beach, Florida; and Billy H. Nolas, Chief, Capital Habeas Unit, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Northern District of Florida, Tallahassee, Florida, for Petitioner
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jennifer A. Donahue, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, for Respondent
   PER CURIAM.

David Miller, Jr., petitions this Court for a writ of habeas corpus seeking relief pursuant to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Hurst v. Florida, --- U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016), and our decision on remand in Hurst v. State (Hurst ), 202 So.3d 40 (Fla. 2016), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 2161, 198 L.Ed.2d 246 (2017). This Court has jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(9), Fla. Const.

This Court stayed Miller's case pending the disposition of Hitchcock v. State, 226 So.3d 216 (Fla. 2017), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017). After this Court decided Hitchcock, Miller responded to this Court's order to show cause arguing why Hitchcock should not be dispositive in this case.

After reviewing Miller's response to the order to show cause, as well as the State's arguments in reply, we conclude that Miller is not entitled to relief. Miller was sentenced to death following a jury's recommendation for death by a vote of seven to five, and Miller's sentence of death became final in 2001. Miller v. State, 770 So.2d 1144, 1146 (Fla. 2000). Thus, Hurst does not apply retroactively to Miller's sentence. See Hitchcock, 226 So.3d at 217. Accordingly, we deny Miller's petition.

The Court having carefully considered all arguments raised by Miller, we caution that any rehearing motion containing reargument will be stricken. It is so ordered.

LABARGA, C.J., and QUINCE, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

PARIENTE, J., concurs in result with an opinion.

LEWIS and CANADY, JJ., concur in result.

PARIENTE, J., concurring in result.

I concur in result because I recognize that this Court's opinion in Hitchcock v. State, 226 So.3d 216 (Fla. 2017), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017), is now final. However, I continue to adhere to the views expressed in my dissenting opinion in Hitchcock.


text:
    Milford Wade BYRD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. SC17-1733
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    [February 28, 2018]
    Neal Dupree, Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Bryan E. Martinez, Staff Attorney, and Martin J. McClain, Special Assistant Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Southern Region, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, for Appellant
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, and Marilyn Muir Beccue, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, Florida, for Appellee
   PER CURIAM.

We have for review Milford Wade Byrd's appeal of the circuit court's order denying Byrd's motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851. This Court has jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const.

Byrd's motion sought relief pursuant to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Hurst v. Florida , --- U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016), and our decision on remand in Hurst v. State (Hurst ), 202 So.3d 40 (Fla. 2016), cert. denied , --- U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 2161, 198 L.Ed.2d 246 (2017). After this Court decided Hitchcock v. State , 226 So.3d 216 (Fla.), cert. denied , --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017), Byrd responded to this Court's order to show cause arguing why Hitchcock should not be dispositive in this case.

After reviewing Byrd's response to the order to show cause, as well as the State's arguments in reply, we conclude that Byrd is not entitled to relief. Byrd was sentenced to death following a jury's recommendation for death. Byrd v. State , 481 So.2d 468, 471 (Fla. 1985). Byrd's sentence of death became final in 1986. Byrd v. Florida , 476 U.S. 1153, 106 S.Ct. 2261, 90 L.Ed.2d 705 (1986). Thus, Hurst does not apply retroactively to Byrd's sentence of death. See Hitchcock , 226 So.3d at 217. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Byrd's motion.

The Court having carefully considered all arguments raised by Byrd, we caution that any rehearing motion containing reargument will be stricken. It is so ordered.

LABARGA, C.J., and POLSTON and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

PARIENTE, J., concurs in result with an opinion.

LEWIS and CANADY, JJ., concur in result.

QUINCE, J. recused.

PARIENTE, J., concurring in result.

I concur in result because I recognize that this Court's opinion in Hitchcock v. State , 226 So.3d 216 (Fla. 2017), cert. denied , --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017), is now final. However, I continue to adhere to the views expressed in my dissenting opinion in Hitchcock .

      The jury's vote to recommend death is unknown. This Court's opinion on direct appeal merely states that "[t]he jury returned an advisory recommendation of the death penalty." Byrd , 481 So.2d at 471.


text:
    Mark Allen GERALDS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. SC17-1765
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    [February 28, 2018]
    Linda McDermott of McClain & McDermott, P.A., Estero, Florida, for Appellant
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Lisa A. Hopkins, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, for Appellee
   PER CURIAM.

We have for review Mark Allen Geralds' appeal of the circuit court's order denying Geralds' motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851. This Court has jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const.

Geralds' motion sought relief pursuant to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Hurst v. Florida , --- U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016), and our decision on remand in Hurst v. State (Hurst ), 202 So.3d 40 (Fla. 2016), cert. denied , --- U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 2161, 198 L.Ed.2d 246 (2017). After this Court decided Hitchcock v. State , 226 So.3d 216 (Fla.), cert. denied , --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017), Geralds responded to this Court's order to show cause arguing why Hitchcock should not be dispositive in this case.

After reviewing Geralds' response to the order to show cause, as well as the State's arguments in reply, we conclude that Geralds is not entitled to relief. Geralds was sentenced to death following a jury's unanimous recommendation for death. Geralds v. State , 674 So.2d 96, 98 (Fla. 1996). Geralds' sentence of death became final in 1996. Geralds v. Florida , 519 U.S. 891, 117 S.Ct. 230, 136 L.Ed.2d 161 (1996). Thus, Hurst does not apply retroactively to Geralds' sentence of death. See Hitchcock , 226 So.3d at 217. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Geralds' motion.

The Court having carefully considered all arguments raised by Geralds, we caution that any rehearing motion containing reargument will be stricken. It is so ordered.

LABARGA, C.J., and QUINCE, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

PARIENTE, J., concurs in result with an opinion.

LEWIS and CANADY, JJ., concur in result.

PARIENTE, J., concurring in result.

I concur in result because I recognize that this Court's opinion in Hitchcock v. State , 226 So.3d 216 (Fla. 2017), cert. denied , --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017), is now final. However, I continue to adhere to the views expressed in my dissenting opinion in Hitchcock .


text:
    Paul Anthony BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. SC17-2086
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    [February 28, 2018]
    Linda McDermott of McClain & McDermott, P.A., Estero, Florida, for Appellant
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, and Doris Meacham, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, Florida, for Appellee
   PER CURIAM.

We have for review Paul Anthony Brown's appeal of the circuit court's order denying Brown's motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851. This Court has jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const.

Brown's motion sought relief pursuant to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Hurst v. Florida , --- U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016), and our decision on remand in Hurst v. State (Hurst ), 202 So.3d 40 (Fla. 2016), cert. denied , --- U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 2161, 198 L.Ed.2d 246 (2017). After this Court decided Hitchcock v. State , 226 So.3d 216 (Fla.), cert. denied , --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017), Brown responded to this Court's order to show cause arguing why Hitchcock should not be dispositive in this case.

After reviewing Brown's response to the order to show cause, as well as the State's arguments in reply, we conclude that Brown is not entitled to relief. Brown was sentenced to death following a jury's unanimous recommendation for death. Brown v. State , 721 So.2d 274, 276-77 (Fla. 1998). Brown's sentence of death became final in 1999. Brown v. Florida , 526 U.S. 1102, 119 S.Ct. 1582, 143 L.Ed.2d 677 (1999). Thus, Hurst does not apply retroactively to Brown's sentence of death. See Hitchcock , 226 So.3d at 217. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Brown's motion.

The Court having carefully considered all arguments raised by Brown, we caution that any rehearing motion containing reargument will be stricken. It is so ordered.

LABARGA, C.J., and QUINCE, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

PARIENTE, J., concurs in result with an opinion.

LEWIS and CANADY, JJ., concur in result.

PARIENTE, J., concurring in result.

I concur in result because I recognize that this Court's opinion in Hitchcock v. State , 226 So.3d 216 (Fla. 2017), cert. denied , --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017), is now final. However, I continue to adhere to the views expressed in my dissenting opinion in Hitchcock .


text:
    Thomas Dewey POPE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. SC17-1812
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    [February 28, 2018]
    Neal Dupree, Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, William M. Hennis III, Litigation Director, and Rachel Day, Chief Assistant Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Southern Region, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, for Appellant
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, and Leslie T. Campbell, Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, Florida, for Appellee
   PER CURIAM.

We have for review Thomas Dewey Pope's appeal of the circuit court's order denying Pope's motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851. This Court has jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const.

Pope's motion sought relief pursuant to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Hurst v. Florida , --- U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016), and our decision on remand in Hurst v. State (Hurst ), 202 So.3d 40 (Fla. 2016), cert. denied , --- U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 2161, 198 L.Ed.2d 246 (2017). After this Court decided Hitchcock v. State , 226 So.3d 216 (Fla.), cert. denied , --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017), Pope responded to this Court's order to show cause arguing why Hitchcock should not be dispositive in this case.

After reviewing Pope's response to the order to show cause, as well as the State's arguments in reply, we conclude that Pope is not entitled to relief. Pope was sentenced to death following a jury's recommendation for death by a vote of nine to three, and his sentence of death became final in 1984. Pope v. State , 441 So.2d 1073, 1075 (Fla. 1983) ; Pope v. Sec'y for Dep't of Corrs. , 680 F.3d 1271, 1278 (11th Cir. 2012). Thus, Hurst does not apply retroactively to Pope's sentence of death. See Hitchcock , 226 So.3d at 217. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Pope's motion.

The Court having carefully considered all arguments raised by Pope, we caution that any rehearing motion containing reargument will be stricken. It is so ordered.

LABARGA, C.J., and QUINCE, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

PARIENTE, J., concurs in result with an opinion.

LEWIS and CANADY, JJ., concur in result.

PARIENTE, J., concurring in result.

I concur in result because I recognize that this Court's opinion in Hitchcock v. State , 226 So.3d 216 (Fla. 2017), cert. denied , --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017), is now final. However, I continue to adhere to the views expressed in my dissenting opinion in Hitchcock .


text:
    Darryl Brian BARWICK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. SC17-2057
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    [February 28, 2018]
    Linda McDermott of McClain & McDermott, P.A., Estero, Florida, for Appellant
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Lisa A. Hopkins, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, for Appellee
   PER CURIAM.

We have for review Darryl Brian Barwick's appeal of the circuit court's order denying Barwick's motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851. This Court has jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const.

Barwick's motion sought relief pursuant to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Hurst v. Florida , --- U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016), and our decision on remand in Hurst v. State (Hurst ), 202 So.3d 40 (Fla. 2016), cert. denied , --- U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 2161, 198 L.Ed.2d 246 (2017). After this Court decided Hitchcock v. State , 226 So.3d 216 (Fla.), cert. denied , --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017), Barwick responded to this Court's order to show cause arguing why Hitchcock should not be dispositive in this case.

After reviewing Barwick's response to the order to show cause, as well as the State's arguments in reply, we conclude that Barwick is not entitled to relief. Barwick was sentenced to death following a jury's unanimous recommendation for death. Barwick v. State , 660 So.2d 685, 689 (Fla. 1995). Barwick's sentence of death became final in 1996. Barwick v. Florida , 516 U.S. 1097, 116 S.Ct. 823, 133 L.Ed.2d 766 (1996). Thus, Hurst does not apply retroactively to Barwick's sentence of death. See Hitchcock , 226 So.3d at 217. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Barwick's motion.

The Court having carefully considered all arguments raised by Barwick, we caution that any rehearing motion containing reargument will be stricken. It is so ordered.

LABARGA, C.J., and QUINCE, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

PARIENTE, J., concurs in result with an opinion.

LEWIS and CANADY, JJ., concur in result.

PARIENTE, J., concurring in result.

I concur in result because I recognize that this Court's opinion in Hitchcock v. State , 226 So.3d 216 (Fla. 2017), cert. denied , --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017), is now final. However, I continue to adhere to the views expressed in my dissenting opinion in Hitchcock .


text:
    Louis B. GASKIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. SC17-2190
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    [February 28, 2018]
    James Vincent Viggiano, Jr., Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, James L. Driscoll Jr., David Dixon Hendry and Gregory W. Brown, Assistant Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Middle Region, Temple Terrace, Florida, for Appellant
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, and Scott A. Browne, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, Florida, for Appellee
   PER CURIAM.

We have for review Louis B. Gaskin's appeal of the circuit court's order denying Gaskin's motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851. This Court has jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const.

Gaskin's motion sought relief pursuant to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Hurst v. Florida , --- U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016), and our decision on remand in Hurst v. State (Hurst ), 202 So.3d 40 (Fla. 2016), cert. denied , --- U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 2161, 198 L.Ed.2d 246 (2017). After this Court decided Hitchcock v. State , 226 So.3d 216 (Fla.), cert. denied , --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017), Gaskin responded to this Court's order to show cause arguing why Hitchcock should not be dispositive in this case.

After reviewing Gaskin's response to the order to show cause, as well as the State's arguments in reply, we conclude that Gaskin is not entitled to relief. Gaskin was sentenced to two sentences of death following a jury's recommendation for "two death sentences for [two] murders [both] by a vote of eight to four." Gaskin v. State , 218 So.3d 399, 400 (Fla. 2017) (citing Gaskin v. State , 591 So.2d 917, 919 (Fla. 1991) ). Gaskin's sentence of death became final in 1993. Id. at 401. Thus, as this Court has previously determined, Hurst does not apply retroactively to Gaskin's sentence of death. See Hitchcock , 226 So.3d at 217 ; Gaskin , 218 So.3d at 401 (denying Gaskin's claim to relief under Hurst v. Florida ). Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Gaskin's motion.

The Court having carefully considered all arguments raised by Gaskin, we caution that any rehearing motion containing reargument will be stricken. It is so ordered.

LABARGA, C.J., and QUINCE, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

PARIENTE, J., concurs in result with an opinion.

LEWIS and CANADY, JJ., concur in result.

PARIENTE, J., concurring in result.

I concur in result because I recognize that this Court's opinion in Hitchcock v. State , 226 So.3d 216 (Fla. 2017), cert. denied , --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017), is now final. However, I continue to adhere to the views expressed in my dissenting opinion in Hitchcock .


text:
    Pablo San MARTIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. SC17-1778
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    [February 28, 2018]
    Gustavo J. Garcia-Montes, Miami, Florida, for Appellant
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, Melissa J. Roca and Brian H. Zack, Assistant Attorneys General, Miami, Florida, for Appellee
   PER CURIAM.

We have for review Pablo San Martin's appeal of the circuit court's order denying San Martin's motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851. This Court has jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const.

San Martin's motion sought relief pursuant to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Hurst v. Florida , --- U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016), and our decision on remand in Hurst v. State (Hurst ), 202 So.3d 40 (Fla. 2016), cert. denied , --- U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 2161, 198 L.Ed.2d 246 (2017). After this Court decided Hitchcock v. State , 226 So.3d 216 (Fla.), cert. denied , --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017), San Martin responded to this Court's order to show cause arguing why Hitchcock should not be dispositive in this case.

After reviewing San Martin's response to the order to show cause, as well as the State's arguments in reply, we conclude that San Martin is not entitled to relief. San Martin was sentenced to death following a jury's recommendation for death by a vote of nine to three. San Martin v. State , 705 So.2d 1337, 1342 (Fla. 1997). San Martin's sentence of death became final in 1998. San Martin v. Florida , 525 U.S. 841, 119 S.Ct. 105, 142 L.Ed.2d 84 (1998). Thus, Hurst does not apply retroactively to San Martin's sentence of death. See Hitchcock , 226 So.3d at 217. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of San Martin's motion.

The Court having carefully considered all arguments raised by San Martin, we caution that any rehearing motion containing reargument will be stricken. It is so ordered.

LABARGA, C.J., and QUINCE, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

PARIENTE, J., concurs in result with an opinion.

LEWIS and CANADY, JJ., concur in result.

PARIENTE, J., concurring in result.

I concur in result because I recognize that this Court's opinion in Hitchcock v. State , 226 So.3d 216 (Fla. 2017), cert. denied , --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017), is now final. However, I continue to adhere to the views expressed in my dissenting opinion in Hitchcock .


text:
    Ronald Palmer HEATH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. SC17-1808
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    [February 28, 2018]
    Billy H. Nolas, Chief, Capital Habeas Unit, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Northern District of Florida, Tallahassee, Florida; and Sonya Rudenstine, Gainesville, Florida, for Appellant
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jennifer A. Donahue, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, for Appellee
   PER CURIAM.

We have for review Ronald Palmer Heath's appeal of the circuit court's order denying Heath's motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851. This Court has jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const.

Heath's motion sought relief pursuant to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Hurst v. Florida , --- U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016), and our decision on remand in Hurst v. State (Hurst ), 202 So.3d 40 (Fla. 2016), cert. denied , --- U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 2161, 198 L.Ed.2d 246 (2017). After this Court decided Hitchcock v. State , 226 So.3d 216 (Fla.), cert. denied , --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017), Heath responded to this Court's order to show cause arguing why Hitchcock should not be dispositive in this case.

After reviewing Heath's response to the order to show cause, as well as the State's arguments in reply, we conclude that Heath is not entitled to relief. Heath was sentenced to death following a jury's recommendation for death by a vote of ten to two. Heath v. State , 648 So.2d 660, 663 (Fla. 1994). Heath's sentence of death became final in 1995. Heath v. Florida , 515 U.S. 1162, 115 S.Ct. 2618, 132 L.Ed.2d 860 (1995). Thus, Hurst does not apply retroactively to Heath's sentence of death. See Hitchcock , 226 So.3d at 217. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Heath's motion.

The Court having carefully considered all arguments raised by Heath, we caution that any rehearing motion containing reargument will be stricken. It is so ordered.

LABARGA, C.J., and QUINCE, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

PARIENTE, J., concurs in result with an opinion.

LEWIS and CANADY, JJ., concur in result.

PARIENTE, J., concurring in result.

I concur in result because I recognize that this Court's opinion in Hitchcock v. State , 226 So.3d 216 (Fla. 2017), cert. denied , --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017), is now final. However, I continue to adhere to the views expressed in my dissenting opinion in Hitchcock .


text:
    Levory William HICKMON, Petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, etc., Respondent.
    No. SC17-997
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    [March 1, 2018]
    Levory William Hickmon, pro se, Lake City, Florida, for Petitioner
    No appearance for Respondent
   PER CURIAM.

This case is before the Court on the pro se petition of Levory William Hickmon for a writ of habeas corpus. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(9), Fla. Const. This is the forty-ninth petition or notice that Hickmon has filed with this Court since 1999. On September 13, 2017, we dismissed the instant petition, expressly retained jurisdiction, and ordered Hickmon to show cause why he should not be barred from filing further pro se filings in this Court. See Hickmon v. Jones , No. SC17-997, 2017 WL 4021217 (Fla. Sept. 13, 2017) ; see also Fla. R. App. P. 9.410(a) (Sanctions; Court's Motion). We now find that Hickmon has failed to show cause why he should not be barred, and we sanction him as set forth below.

In 2006, Hickmon was convicted of fleeing a law enforcement officer, obstructing a criminal investigation, and possessing cocaine in case number 592002CF003627A000XX in the Circuit Court for the Eighteenth Judicial Circuit, in and for Seminole County, Florida. He was sentenced to thirty years' imprisonment. On June 10, 2008, the Fifth District Court of Appeal per curiam affirmed his convictions and sentences. See Hickmon v. State , 983 So.2d 1162 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008) (table). Since then, Hickmon has demonstrated a pattern of vexatious filing of meritless pro se requests for relief in this Court.

Hickmon has filed with this Court twenty-eight petitions and notices challenging his 2006 convictions and sentences. He has filed twenty additional petitions and notices with the Court relating to other matters. Only once has this Court granted Hickmon the relief he sought in any of his petitions and notices. See Hickmon v. Seminole Cty. Corr. Facility , 917 So.2d 193 (Fla. 2005) (table) (granting mandamus petition). Each of the remaining forty-seven petitions and notices was denied, dismissed, or transferred to another court for consideration.

Hickmon filed the instant petition for writ of habeas corpus with the Court on May 23, 2017. In it, Hickmon argued that his convictions and sentences should be set aside because the judges of the Eighteenth Judicial Circuit were allegedly biased against him, and his Sixth Amendment right to counsel and Fourteenth Amendment right to due process were violated at his 2006 trial. Because we determined the relief Hickmon sought was unauthorized, on September 13, 2017, we dismissed the petition as unauthorized pursuant to Baker v. State , 878 So.2d 1236 (Fla. 2004), and expressly retained jurisdiction to consider the imposition of sanctions. In accordance with State v. Spencer , 751 So.2d 47 (Fla. 1999), we ordered Hickmon to show cause why he should not be barred from filing further pro se requests for relief.

In his response to this Court's order, Hickmon maintains that his convictions and sentences were improper and asks to "be let off with a warning." He asserts that due process requires such a warning before his access to this Court is limited. However, Hickmon was provided with notice that the Court was considering the imposition of sanctions and an opportunity to respond thereto, as is required before imposing sanctions. See Spencer , 751 So.2d at 48. Additionally, Hickmon has previously been prohibited from filing further pro se documents in the district court as a result of his unrelenting pro se requests for relief, and it should be no surprise to him that such conduct can lead to being barred from filing further pro se pleadings in this Court. See Hickmon v. State , 96 So.3d 1122 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012) ; Hickmon v. State , 887 So.2d 408 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).

Therefore, based on Hickmon's extensive history of filing pro se petitions and requests for relief that were meritless or otherwise inappropriate for this Court's review, we now find that he has abused this Court's limited judicial resources. See Pettway v. McNeil , 987 So.2d 20, 22 (Fla. 2008) (explaining that this Court has previously "exercised the inherent judicial authority to sanction an abusive litigant" and that "[o]ne justification for such a sanction lies in the protection of the rights of others to have the Court conduct timely reviews of their legitimate filings"). If no action is taken, Hickmon will continue to burden this Court's resources.

Accordingly, we direct the Clerk of this Court to reject any future pleadings or other requests for relief submitted by Levory William Hickmon, unless such filings are signed by a member in good standing of The Florida Bar. Henceforth, Hickmon may only petition this Court through the assistance of counsel whenever such counsel determines that the proceeding may have merit and can be filed in good faith. Additionally, we find the petition filed in this case by Hickmon is a frivolous proceeding filed by a state prisoner. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2017). Consistent with section 944.279(1), Florida Statutes (2017), we direct the Clerk of this Court to forward a certified copy of this opinion to the Department of Corrections' institution or facility where Hickmon is incarcerated. See Steele v. State , 14 So.3d 221, 224 (Fla. 2009).

No motion for rehearing or clarification will be entertained by the Court.

It is so ordered.

LABARGA, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

      See Hickmon v. State , No. SC17-728, 2017 WL 2645318 (Fla. June 20, 2017) (dismissing mandamus petition); Hickmon v. State , No. SC16-16, 2016 WL 743873 (Fla. Feb. 24, 2016) (dismissing mandamus petition); Hickmon v. Crews , No. SC14-484 (Fla. May 22, 2014) (transferring habeas petition to circuit court); Hickmon v. State , 120 So.3d 560 (Fla. 2013) (table) (denying mandamus petition); Hickmon v. Crews , 118 So.3d 807 (Fla. 2013) (table) (dismissing habeas petition); Hickmon v. State , 115 So.3d 1000 (Fla. 2013) (table) (dismissing mandamus petition); Hickmon v. State , 116 So.3d 1261 (Fla. 2013) (table) (denying prohibition petition); Hickmon v. State , 103 So.3d 140 (Fla. 2012) (table) (dismissing notice invoking discretionary jurisdiction); Hickmon v. State , 944 So.2d 344 (Fla. 2006) (table) (denying mandamus petition); Hickmon v. Seminole Cty. Corr. Facility , 917 So.2d 193 (Fla. 2005) (table) (granting mandamus petition); Hickmon v. Seminole Cty. Corr. Facility , 905 So.2d 125 (Fla. 2005) (table) (dismissing notice invoking discretionary jurisdiction); Hickmon v. State , 901 So.2d 873 (Fla. 2005) (table) (denying notice invoking discretionary jurisdiction); Hickmon v. State , 905 So.2d 125 (Fla. 2005) (table) (dismissing mandamus petition as moot); Hickmon v. State , 898 So.2d 80 (Fla. 2005) (table) (denying mandamus petition); Hickmon v. State , 892 So.2d 1012 (Fla. 2004) (table) (denying notice invoking discretionary jurisdiction); Hickmon v. State , No. SC04-1753 (Fla. Dec. 6, 2004) (transferring prohibition petition to district court); Hickmon v. State , 886 So.2d 227 (Fla. 2004) (table) (dismissing mandamus petition); Hickmon v. State , No. SC04-1676 (Fla. Sept. 14, 2004) (transferring habeas petition to circuit court); Hickmon v. State , 884 So.2d 22 (Fla. 2004) (table) (voluntarily dismissing notice invoking discretionary jurisdiction); Hickmon v. State , 869 So.2d 539 (Fla. 2004) (table) (dismissing mandamus petition); Hickmon v. State , 873 So.2d 1223 (Fla. 2004) (table) (dismissing mandamus petition); Hickmon v. State , No. SC03-2098 (Fla. Dec. 16, 2003) (transferring habeas petition to circuit court); Hickmon v. State , 862 So.2d 727 (Fla. 2003) (table) (dismissing habeas petition) (No. SC03-2102); Hickmon v. State , 862 So.2d 727 (Fla. 2003) (table) (dismissing habeas petition) (No. SC03-2101); Hickmon v. State , 780 So.2d 913 (Fla. 2001) (table) (dismissing notice invoking discretionary jurisdiction); Hickmon v. State , 767 So.2d 457 (Fla. 2000) (table) (dismissing notice invoking discretionary jurisdiction); Hickmon v. State , 732 So.2d 327 (Fla. 1999) (table) (dismissing notice invoking discretionary jurisdiction) (No. 95, 478); Hickmon v. State , 732 So.2d 327 (Fla. 1999) (table) (dismissing notice invoking discretionary jurisdiction) (No. 95, 426).

      See Hickmon v. F.B.I. , 157 So.3d 1044 (Fla. 2014) (table) (dismissing notice invoking discretionary jurisdiction); Hickmon v. Crews , No. SC13-2504 (Fla. May 28, 2014) (transferring mandamus petition to district court); Hickmon v. Seminole Cty. Corr. Facility , 5 So.3d 668 (Fla. 2009) (table) (dismissing notice invoking discretionary jurisdiction); Hickmon v. Crist , 3 So.3d 317 (Fla. 2008) (table) (denying mandamus petition); Hickmon v. Prepaid Legal Servs., Inc. , No. SC08-678 (Fla. June 30, 2008) (transferring mandamus petition to district court); Hickmon v. Jackson , 983 So.2d 1154 (Fla. 2008) (table) (dismissing mandamus petition); Hickman v. Crist , 6 So.3d 607 (Fla. 2008) (table) (dismissing notice invoking discretionary jurisdiction); Hickmon v. McDonough , No. SC07-1223 (Fla. July 16, 2007) (transferring habeas petition to circuit court); Hickmon v. Seminole Cty. Corr. Facility , 6 So.3d 607 (Fla. 2007) (table) (denying mandamus petition); Hickmon v. McDonough , No. SC07-560 (Fla. Apr. 9, 2007) (transferring habeas petition to district court); Hickmon v. Stephenson , 949 So.2d 198 (Fla. 2007) (table) (denying mandamus petition); Hickmon v. Seminole Cty. Corr. Facility , 945 So.2d 1290 (Fla. 2006) (table) (denying mandamus petition); Hickmon v. Fla. Dep't of Corr. , 939 So.2d 93 (Fla. 2006) (table) (dismissing mandamus petition); Hickmon v. Clerk of the Circuit Court, Seminole Cty. , 939 So.2d 1058 (Fla. 2006) (table) (denying mandamus petition); Hickmon v. Fla. Dep't of Corr. , 928 So.2d 335 (Fla. 2006) (table) (dismissing notice invoking discretionary jurisdiction); Hickmon v. State , 924 So.2d 808 (Fla. 2006) (table) (denying prohibition petition); Hickmon v. Smith , 918 So.2d 292 (Fla. 2005) (table) (voluntarily dismissing notice invoking discretionary jurisdiction); Hickmon v. Stephenson , 911 So.2d 98 (Fla. 2005) (table) (closing prohibition petition case and placing petition in Case No. SC04-2412 as a motion for stay of proceedings); Hickmon v. Stephenson , 901 So.2d 873 (Fla. 2005) (table) (denying notice invoking discretionary jurisdiction); Hickmon v. State , No. SC05-122 (Fla. Mar. 3, 2005) (transferring mandamus petition to circuit court).


text:
    John R. RICHARDS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    No. SC14-184
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    [March 1, 2018]
    Howard L. "Rex" Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and William L. Sharwell, Assistant Public Defender, Tenth Judicial Circuit, Bartow, Florida, for Petitioner
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, John Klawikofsky, Chief Assistant Attorney General, and Cerese Crawford Taylor, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, Florida, for Respondent
   PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision of the Second District Court of Appeal in Richards v. State , 128 So.3d 959 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013), on grounds of express and direct conflict with this Court's decision in Williams v. State , 123 So.3d 23 (Fla. 2013). See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Having considered the Second District's opinion and the briefs of the parties, upon further review, we have determined that we should exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction. Accordingly, we hereby dismiss review.

It is so ordered.

LABARGA, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

CANADY, J., concurs in result.


text:
    Marcus E. JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-3679
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 29, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Darrell SIRMANS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-3632
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 29, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Korey COLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-5739
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 29, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Kenneth M. BOGGS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-3295
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 29, 2017 Rehearing Denied January 9, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    William RINGWOOD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-3228
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 29, 2017. Rehearing Denied January 9, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Eric Lanode MYRICK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-3442
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 29, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Timmie Lee DOUGLAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-2899
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 29, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Ricky ODOM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-1917
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 29, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Gary E. DOUGHTEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-1062
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 29, 2017. Rehearing Denied January 10, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Leon T. REID, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-3900
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 29, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Denarius Deontrez MASON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-5771
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 29, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    ST. ELIZABETH GARDENS, LTD., Appellant, v. FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION, Respondent/Appellee, and Isles of Pahokee Phase II, LLC; Haley Sofge Preservation Phase One; Three Round Tower A, LLC; Cathedral Towers, Ltd; and SP Manor, LLC, Intervenors/Appellees.
    CASE NO. 1D16-5326
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 29, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Brandy Marie SANDERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-1880
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 4, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Shannon COPELAND, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-4421
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 29, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Dennis HUTTO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-2536
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 29, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Antonio RUSSELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-2176
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed November 29, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Kristin Cortney WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-1876
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 4, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Corey BOONE, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW, Respondent.
    CASE NO. 1D17-1666
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 4, 2017 Rehearing Denied January 17, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   DENIED.


text:
    Serena CHERRY, Appellant, v. REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION and East Bay NE LLC, Appellees.
    CASE NO. 1D17-1366
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 4, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Raymond JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. Julie JONES, Secretary Department of Corrections, Respondent.
    CASE NO. 1D17-1311
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 4, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   DENIED.


text:
    Douglas R. BROWN, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent.
    CASE NO. 1D17-0873
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 4, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   DENIED.


text:
    Xaviar Deshant WALKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-823
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 4, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Harry DUBOSE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-642
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 4, 2017 Rehearing Denied February 22, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Candia WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-5127
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 4, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Bernard Leroy HUTCHINSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-4438
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 4, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Gerrard D. JONES, Appellant, v. J. W. STRAIN, and Florida Department of Corrections, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-597
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 4, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Aveis L. BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-3336
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 4, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Michael Anthony BLANKENSHIP, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-3319
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 4, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    William GOMILLION, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-3297
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 4, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Phillip TAYLOR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-3294
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 4, 2017 Rehearing Denied January 11, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Valentino B LEE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-3292
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 4, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Michael A. JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-3278
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 4, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Khamron ROBINSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-1898
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 4, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Isaac J. ELLERBY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-11
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 4, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Charles SKOLNICK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-4807
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 4, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Larry CLARK, Appellant, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-2705
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 4, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Rustie AMAN, Appellant, v. Johnathon AMAN, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-1420
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 5, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Marlon MOORE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-4295
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 5, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Ronald BOST, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-3284
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 4, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Rapheal J. PALMER, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, State of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-2464
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 4, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Burke SILAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-3923
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 5, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   DISMISSED.


text:
    Melissa FANNIN, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-1358
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 5, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Brianna MAHON, Appellant, v. Kevin J. LEHMAN, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-2999
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 5, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    ZALE CORPORATION/GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES, INC., Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. Snezana GOLIJAN, Appellee/Cross-Appellant.
    CASE NO. 1D17-1075
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 5, 2017 Rehearing Denied January 10, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Tobias ROLLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-352
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 5, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Chapelle A. BRONSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, Robert A. Douglas, Victor Neal, and Carl Cook, Appellees.
    CASE NO. 1D17-0370
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 5, 2017 Rehearing Denied January 31, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Adelita C. STEPHENS, Wife, Appellant, v. Clyde Lewis STEPHENS, Husband, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-0084
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 5, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    HILLSBOROUGH AREA REGIONAL TRANSIT/COMMERCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT, INC., Appellants, v. Oscar SANCHEZ, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-5794
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 5, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Alexander DEAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-5512
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 5, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Lee E. DAVIS, Appellant, v. REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION and Hilton Worldwide Inc., Appellees.
    CASE NO. 1D16-5319
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 5, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Valerie Michelle WEEMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-4818
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 5, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    MS DOCKSIDE MARIANA, LLC, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-841
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 5, 2017 Rehearing Denied January 11, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    J.C., Father of G.N.J.C. and H.R.H.C., Minor Children, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-3717
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 7, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Bobby DENNIS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    CASE NO. 1D17-4638
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 5, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Tony HOPKINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-281
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 5, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    James Maurice REED, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-777
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 5, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Raney RICHARDSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-3397
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 7, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Marcus Ferrell TOLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-3124
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 7, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Betty Sue PORTERFIELD aka Betty Heasley Thomas, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-1842
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 7, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Quash Charles HEIDELBERG, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-1793
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 7, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Kimberly HUGHES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-1459
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 7, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Herman HALL, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW, Respondent.
    CASE NO. 1D17-887
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 7, 2017 Rehearing Denied January 24, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   DENIED.


text:
    Angela WALKER, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES, DIVISION OF LICENSING, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-883
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 7, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Robert NOFAL, Appellant, v. TAVERN ON THE BAY, INC., and Retail First Insurance Company, Summit, Appellees.
    CASE NO. 1D17-0411
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 7, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Wallace D. HURST, Appellant, v. REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION and Vecellio & Grogan, Inc., Appellees.
    CASE NO. 1D16-4640
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 7, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Tony PHILLIPS, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-3145
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 7, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Andre GIBBS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-0047
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 7, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Donold L. ROBINSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-5017
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 7, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Jennifer SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-3440
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 8, 2017. Rehearing Denied February 15, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Benjamin T. BEHNKEN, III, and Maria B. Behnken, Appellants, v. LAKE ASBURY LAKELOT OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., a Florida Non-profit Corporation, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-5290
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 8, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    George BEACHUM, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-1984
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 7, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Carolyn O. O'NEAL, Appellant, v. ST. LUCIE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD and Ascension Insurance and Employers Mutual Inc., Appellees.
    CASE NO. 1D17-0946
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 7, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Marvin Bruce CAMPBELL, Appellant, v. CITY OF JACKSONVILLE/DIVISION OF RISK MANAGEMENT, Appellees.
    CASE NO. 1D17-0935
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 11, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Mark Anthony DALY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-5865
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 11, 2017 Rehearing Denied February 14, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Shawne D. BROGDON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-5057
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 11, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Joshua Brian PITTMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-1095
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 7, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Christian Antwann WOODY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-5144
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 13, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Joseph JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-3236
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 13, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Cody Link EDENFIELD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-1565
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 13, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    George Franklin YOUNG a/k/a George Franklin Young, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-3915
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 11, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Michael Orville MCCURDY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-0647
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 13, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Jefrey ROSARIO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-5591
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 13, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Darryl L. HART, Appellant, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-5511
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 13, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Shannon John QUEEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-5163
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 13, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Steven Paul CANODE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-3899
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 13, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Rickey SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-3706
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 13, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Gerrard D. JONES, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-2990
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 13, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    John Lee JACKSON, III, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-1928
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 13, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Jeffrey RUSHING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-1738
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 13, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Demetrius Augustus COBB, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-1048
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed December 13, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    William Harold SWINDON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D15-5420
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed May 12, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    George DRAYTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-4314
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed April 12, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Wanda ALFANO, Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee under Pooling and Servicing Agreement, Dated as of September 1, 2006, Securitized Asset Backed Receivables, LLC Trust 2006-HE2 Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-HE2, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D15-4930
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 16, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Earon L. TYLER, DOC #547389, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-1134
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 11, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    REGIONS BANK f/k/a AmSouth Bancorporation, an Alabama corporation, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Francesca Bernhardt BEATTY, as successor trustee of the Julia M. Cooke Trust u/t/d October 20, 2004; Jeanne Bernhardt ; and Dorothy Johnson, Appellees/Cross-Appellants.
    Case No. 2D16-1292
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 11, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    AQUAFINZ MANAGEMENT, LLC, et al., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. MOONSTAR 2100, LLC, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-2735
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    July 27, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Christopher A. CLARK, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D16-3299
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    August 04, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Ryan David COX, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Ashley Victoria COX, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D16-4756
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    August 04, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Marco Manuel TORRES, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Honorable Paul T. JESKE, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-1791
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    July 27, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Writ of mandamus is denied.


text:
    Raynette BUNYAN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Rashida STROBER, et al. Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-2672
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    July 26, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Michael CALTA, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Terry Gene BOLLEA, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-2610
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    August 18, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Granted.


text:
    Stephen BREWSTER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-2109
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    August 16, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied as moot.

Denied.


text:
    Wilbur Tishan ALI, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-1974
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    August 04, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Christine CARSON-JUAREZ, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB d/b/a Christiana Trust, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-2221
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    July 26, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Joshua A. BAILEY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-1288
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    August 17, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Granted. Denied. Denied as moot.


text:
    Charles Junior BARBER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-2594
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    August 16, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Joshua Jacques BOWENS, Appellant/petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-2941
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    August 15, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    George E. BAKER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-1365
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    August 10, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Belated appeal is dismissed.


text:
    COX RADIO, INC., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Terry Gene BOLLEA, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-2616
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    August 18, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Granted.


text:
    Jamie COFFEY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-2642
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    August 16, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Mandamus is denied.


text:
    Jacob CLEFA, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-3214
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    August 14, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Habeas corpus is denied.


text:
    Felix Luis CUEVAS-RODRIGUEZ, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-1277
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    August 11, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Mandamus is denied.


text:
    Danny CRUZ, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-2510
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    August 10, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Kenneth John SOMKOVIC, Sr., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-1688
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    August 04, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Thomas TIERNEY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Denise TIERNEY, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-2318
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    August 04, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    David A. VELASCO, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-2639
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    August 04, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Kari CHIN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-3215
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    August 14, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed. Denied.


text:
    Jason M. RIVERA, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, Division of State Fire Marshal, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-1599
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    August 04, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Amanda R. SIFTAR & Kasim Siftar, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D16-4002
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    July 26, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Norma Jean APPELBAUM, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D14-2242
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 12, 2014
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Walter D. DANIELS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-1516
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed September 29, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Jacqueline DENNIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-1378
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed September 6, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Scott L. SORENSON, et al., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. The BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON f/k/a The Bank of New York, as Trustee, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D16-3648
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    July 26, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Mary S. WEBB, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Leada A. COLLINS, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D14-2273
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 12, 2014
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Ricky Jerome WASHINGTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-1464
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed September 29, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Steven Anthony MULLIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D15-3173
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed September 29, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Charles J. CLARK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-3435
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed September 29, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Damien D. FREEMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-1605
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed September 29, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    A.M., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-4102
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed September 29, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Jimmy Lee WALKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-1446
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed September 29, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Lisa MINER, administrator ad litem for the Estate of R.O., Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-4592
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed September 29, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Michael CUMMINGS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-992
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed September 29, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Willie SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-1169
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed September 29, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Kalvin JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-1466
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed September 29, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Dwayne Shamar WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-1505
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed September 29, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    John Wesley JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-2473
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed September 29, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Robert John HUNT, individually and and as co-trustee of the Hunt Family Revocable Living Trust, Appellant, v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION; Michelle Dawn Boudreau, a/k/a Michelle D. Boudreau, individually and as co-trustee of the Hunt Family Revocable Living Trust; and Rita Tison, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-1674
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed September 29, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Anthony SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-1623
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed September 29, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Joseph A. WILSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-1667
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed September 29, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Leonard Jerome SCOTT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-2249
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed September 29, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Tony HOPPS, Doc #480313, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-1009
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed September 29, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Byron LORENZO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-1672
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed September 29, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Jeremy Douglas RETTMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-3221
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed September 29, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    John Wesley JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-1520
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed September 29, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Arnold W. FIELDS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-1601
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed September 29, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Isaac CHAPPELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-4183
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed September 29, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Preston D. CROSKEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-2045
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed September 29, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Donte Verlon SNELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-505
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed September 29, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Linwood SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-1655
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed September 29, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Zevon MCCARTER, Appellant, v. Kourtney Linn RUBIN, individually and o/b/o Z.M., K.M., and A.R., Appellees.
    Case No. 2D16-5187
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed September 29, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Darwin Jermaine OUTSEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-2478
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed September 29, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    James PRZEKLAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-1405
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed September 29, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Brenda A. LEIGH, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D15-3870
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed September 29, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Preston D. CROSKEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-1495
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed September 29, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    IN the INTEREST OF D.K. and D.M., Children.
    S.K., Appellant, v. Department of Children and Families and Guardian Ad Litem Program, Appellees.
    Case No. 2D17-1679
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed September 29, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Jimmy Lee WHEELER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-824
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed September 29, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    TRUSTBIZ, LLC as Trustee Only Under the HC 15-6-12 Land Trust, Appellant, v. U.S. BANK TRUST, N.A., as Trustee for LSF8 Master Participation Trust, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-5656
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed September 29, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    IN the INTEREST OF F.W., a child.
    T.W., Appellant, v. Department of Children and Families and Guardian Ad Litem Program, Appellees.
    Case No. 2D17-732
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed September 29, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Alvin D. HOWARD, as a known heir of the Estate of Alphonso Howard, deceased, Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; Unknown Heirs, Devisees, Grantees, Assignees, Lienors, Creditors, Trustees of Alphonso Howard, deceased; Anthony Howard, a/k/a Anthony C. Howard, as a known heir of the Estate of Alphonso Howard, deceased; Kanesha Howard, as a known heir of the Estate of Alphonso Howard, deceased; Trevion Howard, a minor, as a known heir of the Estate of Alphonso Howard, deceased; Bettie Newmon; Unknown Tenants/ Owners # 2, n/k/a Kamoria Shareef, and Unknown Tenants/ Owners n/k/a Ahmed Shareef, Appellees.
    Case No. 2D17-321
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed September 29, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Eric GREEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-1712
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed October 4, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Thomas C. MONROE; Alvaro Restrepo ; Thomas D. Faircloth; Sean Staffore; the Estate of Adam C. Riber, deceased; and Suzanne G. Faircloth, Appellees.
    Case No. 2D16-4729
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed October 4, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    James ANDERSON, Appellant, v. CITY OF ST. PETE BEACH, a municipal government of the State of Florida; Beverly Garnett; Jim Parent ; Al Halpern; Marvin Shavlan; sued in their official capacity as Commissioners of the City of St. Pete Beach; and Michael Finnerty, sued in his official capacity as Mayor of the City of St. Pete Beach, Appellees.
    Case No. 2D16-5346
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed September 29, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Shedrick Lynn GARY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-3322
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed October 4, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Yvette LEWIS, Appellant, v. Jorge L. COLON, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-4726
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed October 4, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Antonio Tyrone FLOWERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-1171
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed October 4, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Joshua L. ROGERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-796
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed October 4, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Annamarie D. RIETHMILLER, Appellant, v. William RIETHMILLER, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-4647
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed October 4, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Freddie L. SOLOMON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-1793
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed October 4, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    The ESTATE OF Kenneth A. FREGEAU and Heather Fregeau, individually, Appellants, v. David G. HEAVENRIDGE and Philippa J. Heavenridge, Appellees.
    Case No. 2D16-5364
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed October 4, 2017.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Michael CRESCENTE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-1824
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed October 4, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Silas KENDRICKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-1137
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed October 4, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Horce Jay MOTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-1835
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed October 4, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.