text:
    FLORIDA BOARD OF BAR EXAMINERS, Petitioner(s) v. Re: Donald L. FERGUSON, Respondent(s)
    CASE NO.: SC17-1494
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    JULY 10, 2018
    Applicant Donald L. Ferguson's Motion for Rehearing and Motion to Supplement the Record are hereby denied.
    CANADY, C.J., and LEWIS, QUINCE, POLSTON, and LABARGA, JJ., concur.
    PARIENTE and LAWSON, JJ., dissent.


source: Caselaw Access Project

license: Public Domain

text:
    William E. DUNCAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-4273
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    June 13, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Tiffany Latashia ASH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-0762
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    June 13, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   DISMISSED.


text:
    Eric WASHINGTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-3166
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    June 13, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Brian K. TOOLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-0384
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    June 12, 2018 Rehearing Denied August 7, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Eugene REED, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-3093
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    June 13, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Theron DUGAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-2719
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    June 13, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Harry DUBOSE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-2510
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    June 13, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Joseph SIMMONS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-0719
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    June 13, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Brian K. SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-2999
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    June 20, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Lane GREYY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Nos. 1D16-5852 1D17-12
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    June 19, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Allen WILLICH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D16-5207
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    June 19, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Simon A. SANCHEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-3107
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    June 13, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Annette AVILES, Appellant, v. HIDDEN OAKS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION/CASTLEPOINT NATIONAL, Appellees.
    No. 1D17-4350
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    June 20, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Nathaniel A. TOLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-3167
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    June 20, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Clarice CHANEY, Appellant, v. REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION and DCF-HRS District 4-0C 602204, Appellees.
    No. 1D17-2799
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    June 20, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Matthew R. HINSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-3073
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    June 20, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Shane BENNETT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-4423
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    June 20, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Kareem ALI-X, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-5317
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    June 20, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Dexter B. BOWERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-2148
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    June 20, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Robert V. MELTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-0981
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    June 20, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Andrew CLINTON-BAKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-1719
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    June 21, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Jefrey ROSARIO Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-3608
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    June 20, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Jamiah R. THOMAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D16-1870
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    June 20, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Ruben PALMER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-2202
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    June 20, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    CITY OF MIAMI BEACH and Corvel Corporation, Appellants, v. Harry DE BASTIEN, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-5346
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Date of Accident: May 24, 2002. June 25, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Kenneth HUNT, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, Respondent.
    No. 1D17-4791
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    June 25, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    CITY OF GAINESVILLE and Underwriters Safety & Claims, Appellants, v. Starr SERVANCE, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-3876
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    June 25, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Albert K. HAYNES Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-2332
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    June 21, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Robert W. ROSS, Appellant, v. FLORIDA STATE FAIR AUTHORITY and Gallagher Bassett Services, Appellees.
    No. 1D17-3340
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    June 25, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Willis BURTON, Appellant, v. MEYER'S WAREHOUSES and Nationwide Agribusiness Insurance, Appellees.
    No. 1D17-3219
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    June 25, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Shannon Lee LOTT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-2075
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    June 25, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Katerina LEVERETTE, Appellant, v. Jay J. MARTIN, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-4112
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    June 25, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Jason Wade KISSICK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-519
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    June 28, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Jamarius Devonti GRAHAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-2419
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    June 25, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    George WILL, Appellant, v. CITY OF HIGH SPRINGS, a Municipal Corporation in the State of Florida, and High Springs Land Development, LLC, Appellees.
    No. 1D17-2350
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    June 25, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    James GREENWOOD, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    No. 1D17-4103
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    June 25, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Marilyn Bowen GRIFFIN, as Personal Representative for the Estate of James C. Bowen, Appellant, v. FAS CAPITAL, LLC, a Georgia Limited Liability Company, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-4115
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    June 28, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Jeanette TESORIERO, Appellant, v. SHADY REST CARE PAVILION, INC. and Summit/Claims Center, Appellees.
    No. 1D17-5128
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    June 27, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Marjorie GUERRERO d/b/a D & M Management Group, Appellant, v. Paul MOISE d/b/a Assistax, Inc., d/b/a Ameritax Mediation Group, Inc., d/b/a Asset Managing Group, Inc., Appellee.
    No. 1D18-828
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    June 27, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Michael GLOETZNER, Appellant, v. Heather GLOETZNER, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-4706
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    June 27, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Hayssem YAZJI, Appellant, v. Elian Raymond ALBERT, and A&Y Enterprises, Inc., Appellees.
    No. 1D16-4009
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    July 24, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Kenneth L. THOMPSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-1976
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    July 17, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    LaRonald SPEAR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D16-5504
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    July 17, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Valeria Andrea WILSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-1004
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    June 27, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Giovanni VELEZ, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-4775
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    May 11, 2018 Rehearing Denied June 21, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Timothy L. WALDEN, Petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary of the Florida Department of Corrections, Respondent.
    No. 1D18-0995
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    May 11, 2018 Rehearing Denied June 21, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Ryan WILDER, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    No. 1D18-0920
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    May 11, 2018 Rehearing Denied June 21, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Samuel Christopher GOLDEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-1747
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    May 7, 2018 Rehearing Denied June 21, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Rickeyta FITZGERALD, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-1978
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    July 03, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    James H. TIPLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D15-5477
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    May 23, 2018 Rehearing Denied June 27, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Willie WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-3905
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    May 17, 2018 Rehearing Denied June 26, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Harold Lynn STEPHENSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-0042
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    May 11, 2018 Rehearing Denied June 27, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Charles James LAWN, Jr., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Karen WEIL, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-1550
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    July 26, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Alison TORRES, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-2562
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    July 06, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Brian ROMINE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-0010
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 28, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Granted.


text:
    Reginald T. JONES, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-4687
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 28, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Granted.


text:
    Johnny G. BOROMEI, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-4841
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    August 09, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Kevin C. AMBLER, Esq., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DERMATOLOGY HEALTHCARE, LLC, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-1149
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    July 18, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Gregg HARDEN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, o/b/o Jamie Fain, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-1189
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    July 12, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Jim Lee WADE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-4467
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 28, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Brian N. NOEL, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D16-2206
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    August 10, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    FLORIDA PENINSULA INSURANCE CO., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Antonio SANTIAGO, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-2688
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    August 09, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Appeal is dismissed.

Granted.


text:
    E. S., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-0452
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    August 01, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Mathew STROJEK, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-4358
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 26, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Ashley Christina BENEFIELD, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Douglas Glass BENEFIELD, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-3017
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    August 9, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Hal PREWITT, et al., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. ALEGRA MOTORSPORTS, LLC, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-1444
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    August 09, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Ivan ECHEVARRIA, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-0919
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    July 13, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Brittany CHOQUETTE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-0011
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 28, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Granted.


text:
    Steven T. HUMPHREY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-1937
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    July 06, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Max JASPER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-4802
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 29, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Darrell BENJAMIN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-4818
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 28, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Granted.


text:
    Orlando VALENZUELA, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-0596
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    February 21, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Timothy Andrew STANLEY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-4267
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    August 13, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Appeal is dismissed.


text:
    Mary E. BOLLERO, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. ESTATE OF Ellen A. BOLLERO, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-2372
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    July 26, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Appeal is dismissed.


text:
    Kevin WASHINGTON, Jr., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. AMERICAN HOMES 4 RENT PROPERTIES SIX, LLC, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-2499
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    July 26, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    CHUNPING LIN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-2357
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    July 11, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Hannah KUNTZ and Joseph Kuntz, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Nanci J. LABIANCA f/k/a Nanci J. Walsh, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-2700
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    July 18, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed. Denied.


text:
    Joel RYALS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Grady C. JUDD, Sheriff, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-2222
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 21, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Remand.


text:
    Jay BARRINGER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-1095
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    April 25, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Dwayne WRIGHT, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-4750
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 16, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    E.W., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-2478
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    August 09, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Appeal is dismissed.


text:
    Rosanna BASS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. KMART CORPORATION, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-2332
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    July 18, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    G.S.L., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-0935
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    July 18, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Freddie WILSON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. FLORIDA SENTINEL BULLETIN, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-1883
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 26, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Steven WAGNER & Donna Wagner, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A., d/b/a Americas Servicing Company, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-1153
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    July 18, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismiss.


text:
    VALLEY TANK TESTING, LLC, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. TANK TECH, INC., Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-2390
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    July 17, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed. Denied.


text:
    Lloyd SUMMERALL, Jr., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-2576
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    July 10, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Granted.


text:
    William MC GEE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-2127
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    July 06, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    P. W., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-1402
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    August 02, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Appeal is dismissed.


text:
    B. S., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-0281
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    August 02, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    A. V., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-0278
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    August 02, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Appeal is dismissed.


text:
    Carlos GOODMAN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. In re: The FORFEITURE OF THIRTY-EIGHT THOUSAND SEVENTY DOLLARS, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-1570
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    July 18, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Ricardo LEON and Silvia Martinez, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. MONROE COUNTY, Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-1587
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    FEBRUARY 26, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    LADOVE, INC., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. IT'S A "10," INC., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-0603
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    FEBRUARY 19, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    B.M., the Mother, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-2445
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    JANUARY 26, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    LA VENSTON LAMONT HORNE, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-1397
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    JANUARY 24, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Ivona KARBOWSKI, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-1650
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    FEBRUARY 27, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    ENERGY3, LLC (E3), etc., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. ECO-TECH SOLUTIONS, INC., etc., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-1631
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    FEBRUARY 21, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Jose VIVO, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Dayira HERNANDEZ, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-1817
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    FEBRUARY 20, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    AMERICASH PAWN SHOP, INC., et al., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Abdelkarim J. GHUNAIM, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-1832
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    FEBRUARY 19, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Randolph BAGGETT, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Jane WEINTRAUB and Discovery Communications, Inc., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D18-0275
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    FEBRUARY 28, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Hencile DORSEY Sr., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. GREEN TREE SERVICING LLC, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s)
    CASE NO.: 3D18-0237
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    FEBRUARY 27, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Walter MAINO Jr., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. BENWORTH CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D18-0316
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    FEBRUARY 22, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Jennifer ANDOLLO and Saul Andollo, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. FIRST COMMUNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-2211
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    FEBRUARY 21, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    AMERICAN TROPICAL SIGNS AND SERVICES, LLC, etc., et al., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Alec BLOTNICK, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-2515
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    FEBRUARY 27, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Macy Courtney Betzold WHEELOCK, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. In re: ESTATE OF Yvonne BETZOLD, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-2547
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    FEBRUARY 20, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Macy Courtney Betzold WHEELOCK, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. In re: Guardianship of Yvonne BETZOLD, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-2548
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    FEBRUARY 20, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    3590 MYSTIC POINTE LLC, etc., et al., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Larry KAREL, etc., et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D18-0161
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    FEBRUARY 19, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Timothy Brian GREER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 3D17-2130
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Opinion filed March 7, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    AMERICAN TROPICAL SIGNS AND SERVICES, LLC, etc., et al., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Alec BLOTNICK, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-2535
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    FEBRUARY 27, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Randy PATTERSON, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. ALBERICI CONSTRUCTION, INC., et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D18-0315
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    FEBRUARY 26, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Transferred.


text:
    Rosa HALLON, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-2070
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    FEBRUARY 16, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Yulin TANG, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Odalys MORALES, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-0855
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    FEBRUARY 09, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Alex ADRIANZA, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. TOWER HILL PREFERRED INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-0134
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    FEBRUARY 1, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Candice Lynn WOLFSON, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Howard WOLFSON, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-0974
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    JANUARY 31, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Trell Deon JONES, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-1191
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    JANUARY 29, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismiss.


text:
    Gilbert J. CHIDIAC, M.D. and Bryan N. Robbins, M.D., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Mariah TUCKER, etc., et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-1449
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    FEBRUARY 08, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Jose VILLONI, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-1629
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    FEBRUARY 06, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Manuel NEIRA, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, etc., et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-1886
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    FEBRUARY 6, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Carlos PEREZ, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Thomas ADAMS, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-1864
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    FEBRUARY 5, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Lashawn WRIGHT, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Jack E. BRIDGES, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-2367
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    FEBRUARY 09, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Nancy SEGARRA, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. WILMINGTON TRUST, N.A., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-2164
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    FEBRUARY 01, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Andras Janos VASS, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-2294
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    JANUARY 29, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Joshua BROUGHTON, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-2047
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    SEPTEMBER 19, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Rita Moraima ABBOUD, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Ricardo VILLAVERDE and Ivon Villaverde, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-2536
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    FEBRUARY 09, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.

Denied as moot.


text:
    Rudolph MAXWELL, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 3D17-2719
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    FEBRUARY 08, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Granted. Dismissed.


text:
    Jose Antonio AYES, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. BIG DOG EXPRESS OF SOUTH FLORIDA, INC., etc., et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D18-0028
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    FEBRUARY 07, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    CITY OF MIAMI, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Walter E. HEADLEY, Jr., etc., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-2455
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    DECEMBER 20, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Yusmel Legra HINOJOSA, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Child Support Program, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D18-0130
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    FEBRUARY 09, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Kevin L. GAITER, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D18-0150
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    FEBRUARY 09, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Writ of mandamus.


text:
    Gustavo MOZO, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. AURORA LOAN SERVICES LLC, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D18-0092
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    FEBRUARY 07, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Darryl James MCGLAMRY, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. KMC ASSETS, LLC, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D18-0075
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    JANUARY 29, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    SARASOTA COMMONS, LTD., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. FITNESS INTERNATIONAL, LLC, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D18-0151
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    FEBRUARY 08, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Withhold formal issuance of the writ.


text:
    Carl GRIGGS, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D18-0224
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    FEBRUARY 07, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Geronimo PEREZ, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D18-0190
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    JANUARY 31, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, et al., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Kenneth GLOGER, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Irene Gloger, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D18-0177
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    JANUARY 29, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied as moot.


text:
    E-Yage BOWENS, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D18-0225
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    February 7, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Steven YOUNG, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D18-0226
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    FEBRUARY 07, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Norman E. CAISON, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D18-0229
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    February 07, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    James THOMPSON, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D18-0230
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    FEBRUARY 07, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Alexy MATOS, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-0558
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    MARCH 07, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Ralph L. JAMES, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D16-2886
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    FEBRUARY 13, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    CITY OF NORTH MIAMI, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. C & M SWEET BAKERY, INC., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-2695
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    FEBRUARY 09, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    GRANITE EXPRESS OF USA, INC., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. JACIGUA MARMORES E GRANITOS LTDA., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-0466
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    JANUARY 23, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Joseph J. DEMTY, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, etc., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-1804
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    MARCH 07, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    OLD CUTLER GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Michael WEINER, M.D. Profit Sharing Plan, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-2088
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    MARCH 07, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    David BOTERO, et al., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. OBM, MIAMI, INC., etc., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-2078
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    MARCH 06, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Hernan Lazaro CONCEPCION, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-1093
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    FEBRUARY 13, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Joseph J. DEMTY, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. U.S. BANK, N.A., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-2202
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    MARCH 07, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    UNIVERSITY HOUSING BY DAYCO CORP., et al., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Rogelio FOCH, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-2119
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    MARCH 06, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, etc., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Sandra ARTHUR, etc., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-2379
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    MARCH 06, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Jenna Wanda Ann BRAJDIC, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-2222
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    FEBRUARY 15, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    John W. BOLTON, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES DIVISION OF LICENSING, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-2561
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    MARCH 07, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Maritza MASTRAPA, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. SELENE FINANCE LP, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-2796
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    MARCH 07, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    ANDARA, LLC, etc., et al., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. 1501 COLLINS AVENUE, LLC, etc., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D18-0139
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    MARCH 06, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Tayseer H. ABED, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. VILLAGE SQUARE SHOPPING CENTER OF WINTER HAVEN, LLC, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-2589
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    FEBRUARY 15, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Mary A. JOHNSON, et al., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. WATERFALL VICTORIA MASTER FUND, LTD., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D18-0179
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    FEBRUARY 16, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Philippe JOSEPH, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE CHILD SUPPORT PROGRAM, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D18-0148
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    FEBRUARY 13, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Christopher J. KNAPP, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT PROGRAM, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D18-0166
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    FEBRUARY 13, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Oliver COCHRAN, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D18-0186
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    FEBRUARY 12, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Writ of mandamus. Denied.


text:
    Joseph J. DEMTY, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D18-0202
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    MARCH 07, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    James THOMPSON, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D18-0276
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    FEBRUARY 16, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Cornellius LOFTON, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D18-0227
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    FEBRUARY 13, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Jerry Neil ALFRED, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D18-0242
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    FEBRUARY 12, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Stricken.


text:
    Nelson Eaton JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D17-269
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [June 28, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Keith CARTER, Appellant, v. Anita G. ABRAHAM, Appellee.
    No. 4D16-3631
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [June 21, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Crystal RICHARDS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D17-1132
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [June 21, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Ulish ROLAND, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Daniel JUNIOR, etc., et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D18-0282
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    FEBRUARY 16, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Bendy SAINTHILAIRE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D16-2769
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [July 12, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Jerry JEAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D16-3525
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [July 12, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Warren TARVER, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    No. 4D18-1872
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [July 5, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Samuel L. TURNER, III, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D16-3691
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [July 5, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    INVESTMENT CORPORATION OF PALM BEACH, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING, Appellee.
    No. 4D15-460
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [July 19, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Giancarlo Anthony CAMERON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D17-0009
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [July 12, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Michenel DERILUS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D17-0458
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [July 12, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Robert BUTLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D17-655
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [July 12, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Marilyn OSHINSKY-BLACKER, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Dennis Oshinsky, Appellant, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA INC. and R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Appellees.
    No. 4D17-915
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [July 19, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    PELICAN VIEW PROJECT, LLC, Appellant, v. BOYLE & DRAKE, INC., Appellee.
    No. 4D17-581
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [July 19, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Keith D. SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-3307
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed April 24, 2018 Rehearing Denied July 6, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Elijah A. DEZION, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-10
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed June 5, 2018 Rehearing Denied July 6, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Rodgerick Angelo SHOULDERS, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-1769
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed May 29, 2018 Rehearing Denied July 6, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Dave BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-3222
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed May 15, 2018 Rehearing Denied July 3, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Felipe GARCIA-ROQUE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-2954
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed May 8, 2018 Rehearing Denied July 11, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Orbary MCKINNON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-3842
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed June 19, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Angel Bello FLORES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-1347
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed June 12, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    James T. COAKLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-3313
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed June 5, 2018 Rehearing Denied July 6, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Gustavo LA ROSA, Appellant, v. Karen LA ROSA, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-3093
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed June 5, 2018 Rehearing Denied July 6, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Antonio Gregory GOULD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-1524
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed July 3, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Quincy Terrell PAYNE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-1137
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed July 3, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Gordon DANIEL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-1054
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed July 3, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Darrin GALLOWAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-957
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed July 3, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Elton Lee BAKER, Sr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-782
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed July 3, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Bernard S. NELSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-682
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed July 3, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    D.H., Father of A.H., a Child, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-567
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed July 3, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Maurice L. AMOS, III, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-312
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed July 3, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Gregory Bernard BLAKE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-144
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed July 3, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Thomas Vincent PELKEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case Nos. 5D17-4094 5D17-4095
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed July 3, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Steven SHAREK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-2475
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed July 3, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Jeffrey FARINA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-1417
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed July 3, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Roger L. LOWMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-521 5D17-3927
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed July 3, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    George OLMO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-2378
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed July 3, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Lloyd WELCH, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-2070
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed July 3, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Domingo FIGUEROA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-847
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed July 3, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Devoran ELLIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-4028
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed July 3, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Dunia RIEDEL, Appellant, v. Joseph C. RIEDEL, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-3595
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed July 3, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Sanswon EAST, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-2951
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed July 3, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Luis JOSEPH, Appellant, v. Alier PARADA, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-2263
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed July 3, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    SOVEREIGN GLOBAL ADVISORS, LLC and Zaid Ali, Appellants, v. LENDING HOME FUNDING CORP., Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-1360
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed July 3, 2018 Rehearing Denied July 25, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Wayne Maurice MAXWELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D16-3257
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed July 3, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Robin BOUEY, Appellant, v. ORANGE COUNTY SERVICE UNIT, Orange County Classroom Teachers Association and Orange County Education Support Professional Association, Appellees.
    Case No. 5D17-3241
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed July 3, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    James POWELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-3149
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed July 3, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Charles J. BARBER a/k/a Lester Clyde Bagley, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-2902
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed July 3, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Henry REESE, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-2801
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed July 3, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Colby CLIFTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-2649
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed July 3, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Trisha CREWS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-2304
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed July 3, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Shameer HASSAN and Sandy Dhanphat, Appellants, v. PENNYMAC CORP., Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-1639
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed July 3, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Junior J. BATISTA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-1352
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed July 3, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Michael CRABTREE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-3913
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed July 3, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Jennifer HENDERSON, Appellant, v. Bernard CHATTAWAY, Jr. O/B/O N. CHATTAWAY, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-3369
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed July 3, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    G.J., Father of L.J., a Child, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-1244
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed July 12, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Michelle C. SMITH, Appellant, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF LAW ENFORCEMENT, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-3999
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed July 10, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    TRUSTCO BANK, Appellant, v. Thomas J. WEBB, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-2955
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed July 10, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    James A. FERRARO, Appellant, v. PNC BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and Michael Francis, Appellees.
    Case No. 5D17-3197
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed July 3, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    T.B., Father of B.B., a Child, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-1342
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed July 11, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    LLANO FINANCING GROUP, LLC, Appellant, v. Ernest KIRKLAND and Kirkland Valuation Services, LLC, Appellees.
    Case No. 5D17-2699
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed July 10, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Sanyia S. BOOTH, Appellant, v. Carl E. BOOTH, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-2140
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed July 10, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    QUOC BAO LE-HUU, Appellant, v. BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, a North Carolina Banking Corporation, as successor-in-interest to Colonial Bank by Asset Acquisition from the FDIC as Receiver for Colonial Bank, et al., Appellees.
    Case No. 5D17-960
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed July 10, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Sanyia S. BOOTH, Appellant, v. Carl E. BOOTH, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-3359
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed July 10, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    ORLANDO PROPERTY ACQUISITIONS, LLC, Appellant, v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON f/k/a the Bank of New York ON BEHALF OF the ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2006-OA11 MORTGAGE PASS THROUGH CERTIFICATES SERIES 2006-OA11, Valeri Vyalkov and Sarah Vyalkova , Appellees.
    Case No. 5D17-1232
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed July 10, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


author: Luck, R., Associate Judge.

text:
    DIOCESE OF PALM BEACH, INC., Petitioner, v. Father John GALLAGHER, Respondent.
    No. 4D17-2579
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [May 9, 2018]
    J. Patrick Fitzgerald and Associates, and J. Patrick Fitzgerald, Roberto Diaz, and Maura F. Jennings, Coral Gables, and Gaebe, Mullen, Antonelli & DiMatteo, and Elaine D. Walter, Michael A. Mullen, and Joseph M. Winsby, Coral Gables, and Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, and Mark E. Chopka, Washington, DC, for petitioner.
    Babbitt & Johnson, P.A., and Theodore Babbitt, West Palm Beach, and Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A., and Philip M. Burlington, West Palm Beach, and Nichole J. Segal, West Palm Beach, for respondent.
   Luck, R., Associate Judge.

Father John Gallagher, a Catholic priest, sued the diocese in which he served, the Diocese of Palm Beach, Inc., for defamation. The diocese moved to dismiss the complaint based on the ecclesiastical abstention doctrine, which prevents civil courts from deciding matters that require adjudication of theological controversy, church discipline, ecclesiastical government, and the conformity of the members of the church to the standard of morals required of them. The trial court denied the dismissal motion, declining to apply the ecclesiastical abstention doctrine because Father Gallagher's defamation claims could be resolved based on neutral legal principles without entangling the courts in the interpretation and application of church law, policies, and practices. We disagree, and grant the diocese's petition for writ of prohibition, because Father Gallagher's defamation claim, which arises out of an employment dispute between him and the diocese, cannot be resolved without the courts excessively entangling themselves in what is essentially a religious dispute.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Father Gallagher was ordained as a priest in the Catholic Church on June 21, 1992. He first served in his homeland of Northern Ireland, later immigrating to the United States. In 2000, Father Gallagher was incardinated with the Diocese of Palm Beach. Father Gallagher held the following positions with the diocese:

• Sept. 1, 2000-Aug. 1, 2002: Parochial vicar at St. Anastacia Church, Ft. Pierce
• Aug. 1, 2002-June 30, 2005: Parochial vicar at the Cathedral of St. Ignatius Loyola, Palm Beach Gardens
• July 1, 2005-Sept. 30, 2009: Parochial vicar at St. Joan of Arc Church, Boca Raton
• Oct. 1, 2009-July 12, 2012: Special leave to study
• Dec. 1, 2013-June 30, 2014: Parochial vicar, Holy Name of Jesus Church, West Palm Beach
• July 1, 2014-June 30, 2015: Parochial administrator, Holy Name
• July 1, 2015-present: Special leave.

Father Gallagher began his association with the Holy Name of Jesus Church in December 2013 when he was assigned to that parish as parochial vicar. On April 14, 2014, Father Gallagher was named parochial administrator of Holy Name. In December of that year, Father Joseph Palimattom, a priest from India, was assigned to assist Father Gallagher as parochial vicar. Father Palimattom had not been with the church a month when the incident sparking the controversy between Father Gallagher and the diocese occurred.

On the evening of January 5, 2015, Father Gallagher received a text message from the church's music minister. A 14-year old boy complained to the music minister that Father Palimattom had shown him numerous photographs containing child pornography. The matter was referred to the Palm Beach County sheriff's office, who arrested Father Palimattom. As a result of the investigation, Father Palimattom pleaded guilty to possessing and showing pornography to a minor, was briefly incarcerated, and subsequently deported to India.

After the incident, Father Gallagher was reassigned from Holy Name. Diocese officials met with Hispanic members of Holy Name who were dissatisfied with how they were treated by Father Gallagher. The diocese personnel committee, in May 2015, discussed Father Gallagher's assignment. Ultimately, the bishop decided not to offer Father Gallagher the office of pastor to Holy Name, but instead to transfer him to another parish. Father Gallagher did not accept the transfer and instead took leave.

Father Gallagher believed that the diocese attempted to cover-up the sexual abuse incident, and that his reassignment was intended as punishment for not going along with the cover-up. Father Gallagher initially complained to Catholic Church officials. When this was unsuccessful, Father Gallagher went to the Irish media.

Father Gallagher told an interviewer on Irish radio that he exposed the workings of the diocese and Vatican and their lack of transparency in complying with policies and procedures in exposing pedophiles. Father Gallagher said of the Church that it had proven it did not have integrity, honor, and a moral compass to self-police, and the powers-that-be are corrupt all the way through to the bishop. The Church, Father Gallagher said, had a corporate mindset, and as the oldest government in the world its corruption was unique to itself. Father Gallagher explained that he was being attacked for exposing the crime and had the full wrath of the diocese.

In response, a number of diocese officials commented about Father Gallagher publicly to parishioners and the local press. The diocese's response is the basis for Father Gallagher's defamation complaint.

Father Gallagher claimed the diocese defamed him in newspaper articles, letters to parishioners which were read at masses, press statements posted on the diocese webpage, electronic mail among diocese personnel, and postings on diocese personnel's social media. These statements, Father Gallagher alleged, defamed him by calling him a liar, unfit to be a priest, and in need of professional help.

In his complaint, Father Gallagher claimed that as a result of these defamatory statements, he "was damaged in his reputation and his livelihood," "his ability to serve in his chosen profession as a priest has been greatly diminished or eliminated," "[h]e has lost both past and future income and the ability to earn money in the future," and "he has suffered mental and physical pain and suffering ... aggravation of a preexisting condition ... [and the] ability to lead and enjoy a normal life." Father Gallagher demanded both compensatory and punitive damages.

The diocese responded to the complaint by filing a motion to dismiss based on the ecclesiastical abstention doctrine. In its motion, the diocese argued that Father Gallagher's claim, although pleaded as a defamation claim, was "equivalent to a wrongful discharge or employment retaliation case." The resolution of the claim, the diocese argued, would require the trial court to consider questions of internal church governance, which was barred by the ecclesiastical abstention doctrine. After briefing, the trial court denied the motion to dismiss because, it said, it could decide whether defamation occurred applying neutral principles of law "without inquiry into religious doctrine."

The diocese petitioned for a writ of prohibition.

DISCUSSION

"Prohibition lies where a petitioner has demonstrated that a trial court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over a lawsuit. It has been invoked successfully in cases in which a party challenges a court's subject matter jurisdiction to entertain a dispute involving a religious doctrine." House of God Which Is the Church of the Living God, the Pillar & Ground of the Truth Without Controversy, Inc. v. White , 792 So.2d 491, 492 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (citations omitted).

Ecclesiastical Abstention Doctrine.

The church autonomy doctrine, or ecclesiastical abstention doctrine, prevents civil courts from deciding matters that require adjudication of "theological controversy, church discipline, ecclesiastical government, or the conformity of the members of the church to the standard of morals required of them," Watson v. Jones , 80 U.S. 679, 733, 13 Wall. 679, 20 L.Ed. 666 (1871)....
The doctrine, which has roots in both the free exercise and establishment clauses of the United States Constitution, U.S. Const. amend. I ("Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof"), has its core application in cases where a court intrudes on a church's autonomous management of its own internal affairs and property, thereby either burdening or inhibiting the exercise of religious freedom (free exercise clause) or fostering an excessive government entanglement with religion (establishment clause).

Flynn v. Estevez , 221 So.3d 1241, 1245-46 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (footnotes omitted).

The doctrine "precludes courts from exercising jurisdiction where an employment decision concerns a member of the clergy or an employee in a ministerial position." Archdiocese of Miami, Inc. v. Minagorri , 954 So.2d 640, 641 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007).

Courts may not consider employment disputes between a religious organization and its clergy because such matters necessarily involve questions of internal church discipline, faith, and organization that are governed by ecclesiastical rule, custom, and law. Whether an individual is qualified to be a clergy member of a particular faith is a matter to be determined by the procedures and dictates of that particular faith.
....
The interaction between a church and its pastor is an essential part of church government.... Thus, civil courts must abstain from deciding ministerial employment disputes ..., because such state intervention would excessively inhibit religious liberty.

SE Conference Ass'n of Seventh-Day Adventists, Inc. v. Dennis , 862 So.2d 842, 844 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (citations and quotations omitted). "[T]he relationship between an organized church and its ministers is its lifeblood.... Matters touching this relationship must necessarily be recognized as of prime ecclesiastical concern." Malichi v. Archdiocese of Miami , 945 So.2d 526, 529 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) (omission in original) (quoting McClure v. Salvation Army , 460 F.2d 553, 558-59 (5th Cir. 1972) ).

However, "[t]he subject of a priest's employment relationship with his church is not per se barred by the church autonomy doctrine." Id.

[C]ourts have held that the application of a neutral law that does not require inquiry into or resolution of an ecclesiastical matter may be permissible .... Simply because a church is involved as a litigant does not make the matter a religious one; instead, inquiry must be made [1] as to the nature of the dispute and [2] whether it can be decided on neutral principles of secular law without a court intruding upon, interfering with, or deciding church doctrine.

Flynn , 221 So.3d at 1247.

The nature of Father Gallagher's dispute with the diocese is defamation, which requires him to allege and prove the defamatory statement was published, it was false, the person who said it must have been acting "with knowledge or reckless disregard as to the falsity," and Father Gallagher suffered actual damages as a result of the statement. Jews For Jesus, Inc. v. Rapp , 997 So.2d 1098, 1106 (Fla. 2008). As in Flynn , we must ask whether Father Gallagher's defamation claim can be decided on neutral principles of secular law; or, is this a ministerial employment dispute that would require the courts to get excessively entangled in issues of internal church discipline, faith, and organization that are governed by ecclesiastical rule, custom, and law.

Actual Damages

Father Gallagher's complaint asked for compensatory and punitive damages because the diocese's defamation diminished or eliminated his ability to serve in his chosen profession as a priest, and damaged his livelihood. Father Gallagher also requested actual damages because the defamation caused him to lose past income and his ability to earn future income.

Deciding Father Gallagher's claim for actual damages would require the courts to delve into why Father Gallagher was not promoted to pastor, and was reassigned to another parish. This would require the court to question the diocese's employment decision to hire, retain, or discipline Father Gallagher-a member of the diocese-and the reasoning behind its decision.

The Third District has affirmed the dismissal of a similar claim in Goodman v. Temple Shir Ami, Inc. , 712 So.2d 775 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998). There, as here, a religious leader (a rabbi) sued his congregation and a member of the board of directors for defamation. Id. at 776. The board of directors decided not to renew the rabbi's contract because "of disagreement about religious concepts," and an investigation by one of the board members which revealed that the rabbi had struck a senior rabbi while employed at another synagogue in Chicago, and then later unjustly sued the Chicago synagogue. Id. at 776-77.

The trial court dismissed the defamation claim based on the ecclesiastical abstention doctrine, and the Third District affirmed:

In order for the trial court to have resolved these disputes, it would have had to immerse itself in religious doctrines and concepts and "determine" whether the religious disagreements were a "valid" basis for the termination of Rabbi Goodman's services. The allegedly defamatory report ... occurred as part of this religious dispute and would require the trial court to weigh their effect on the board members as compared to the effects of the other considerations which clearly are religious disagreements.

Id. at 777.

Here, too, to resolve Father Gallagher's actual damages claim, the courts would have to determine whether the diocese's reasons for not making him a pastor, and reassigning him to another church, were valid religious reasons concerning Father Gallagher's fitness for the job, or retaliation for Father Gallagher's whistleblowing. Like the Goodman court, we would be required to weigh the effect of Father Gallagher's problems with his Hispanic congregants on the advisory committee's decision to pass over Father Gallagher for the position of pastor, and whether this was a valid religious reason for the diocese's decision. As the Goodman court explained, "[i]nquiring into the adequacy of the religious reasoning behind the dismissal of a spiritual leader is not a proper task for a civil court." Id. We are not permitted to look behind the diocese's ministerial employment decision because doing so would necessarily entangle us in questions about the religious reasons why Father Gallagher was not promoted under canonical law.

Also problematic is Father Gallagher's demand for front- and backpay and compensatory and punitive damages. Such an award would be a penalty for the diocese exercising its right to determine which priests to promote and assign to its parishes. The courts would be required to intrude excessively in the diocese's ministerial employment decisions by finding that Father Gallagher's non-promotion and reassignment were done for improper reasons. As the Supreme Court explained in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & Sch. v. E.E.O.C. , 565 U.S. 171, 132 S.Ct. 694, 181 L.Ed.2d 650 (2012), a case involving a claim of improper termination of a school minister:

[The minister] no longer seeks reinstatement, having abandoned that relief before this Court. But that is immaterial. [The minister] continues to seek frontpay in lieu of reinstatement, backpay, compensatory and punitive damages, and attorney's fees. An award of such relief would operate as a penalty on the Church for terminating an unwanted minister, and would be no less prohibited by the First Amendment than an order overturning the termination. Such relief would depend on a determination that [the Church] was wrong to have relieved [the minister] of her position, and it is precisely such a ruling that is barred by the ministerial exception.

Id. at 194, 132 S.Ct. 694 (citation omitted). The courts, here, are similarly barred from penalizing the diocese and determining the diocese was wrong for deciding Father Gallagher was not the right clergyman for Holy Name.

Falsity

Father Gallagher's complaint also alleged that he was defamed by the diocese's statements that he was unfit to serve as a priest and needed professional help. As part of the defamation claim, the courts would have to determine whether these claims were false.

Determining the falsity of whether Father Gallagher was unfit to serve gets the court excessively entangled in Catholic Church doctrines and canonical law. The falsity question turns on whether Father Gallagher was doing what he was supposed to be doing as a priest and parochial administrator at Holy Name. In his interactions with parishioners, fellow priests, and the diocese hierarchy, was Father Gallagher following Church canons and teachings? Father Gallagher says yes; the diocese says no.

We do not need to answer the question because asking it requires us to determine the duties assigned to a priest that make him fit to serve, and whether Father Gallagher was qualified to do the job. A determination of a priest's duties and whether he is qualified to serve are uniquely decisions of the diocese, and would excessively entangle us in questions of religious administration and government, and the procedures and dictates of the Catholic faith. See Malichi , 945 So.2d at 531 ("Determination of a priest's duties is a matter of the church's internal administration and government."); Dennis , 862 So.2d at 844 ("Whether an individual is qualified to be a clergy member of a particular faith is a matter to be determined by the procedures and dictates of that particular faith.").

We have the same entanglement problem with the falsity of the diocese's statement that Father Gallagher was in need of professional help. The diocese imposed the requirement that Father Gallagher receive professional help as a necessary disciplinary step for him to resume his "priestly ministry." ("As always, [Father Gallagher] will be given every opportunity for appropriate priestly ministry, based on his willingness to tell the truth, accept assistance, and apologize for the harm he continues to cause." "Father Gallagher has acted in a similar manner in other situations in the past and has been given every opportunity for correction, including the possibility of professional assistance.")

Whether Father Gallagher was actually in need of professional help is beside the point. As we have explained, "[t]he church authorities and such tribunals as they may set up for themselves are supreme in all spiritual matters and may arbitrarily expel from membership any individual with or without cause, as long as no civil rights are involved.... This is true, whether the expulsion of the individual be in disregard of the usage and practice of the church, or not."

Kond , 769 So.2d at 1076 (quoting Partin v. Tucker , 126 Fla. 817, 172 So. 89, 92-93 (1937) ). What is true for expulsions and excommunications is just as true for lesser disciplinary decisions like requiring a church member or clergy to seek professional help. Reviewing the falsity of whether Father Gallagher needed professional help will excessively entangle the courts in determining whether the diocese correctly imposed this disciplinary step on Father Gallagher, and whether the diocese followed its disciplinary practices and procedures. See Flynn , 221 So.3d at 1245 ("The ... ecclesiastical abstention doctrine[ ] prevents civil courts from deciding matters that require adjudication of ... church discipline ...." (quotation omitted) ).

CONCLUSION

To repeat, not every church-priest dispute is shielded by the ecclesiastic abstention doctrine. Malichi , 945 So.2d at 529 ("The subject of a priest's employment relationship with his church is not per se barred by the church autonomy doctrine."). Where the "dispute can be resolved by applying neutral principles of law without inquiry into religious doctrine and without resolving a religious controversy, the civil courts may adjudicate the dispute." Dennis , 862 So.2d at 844. Where, though, the dispute implicates internal church discipline, faith, organization, and ecclesiastical rule, custom, and law, "the civil courts must abstain from deciding" it "because such state intervention would excessively inhibit religious liberty." Id. (quotation omitted).

Father Gallagher's complaint that the diocese's statements were false and resulted in actual damages cannot be decided on neutral principles. These claims would entangle the courts in the diocese's ministerial staffing decisions, the interpretation and application of canons and doctrines, and Church discipline, which the civil courts must abstain from reviewing and deciding. We grant the petition for writ of prohibition on Father Gallagher's defamation complaint, and quash the trial court's order, but withhold formal issuance of the writ confident the trial court will dismiss the complaint based on the ecclesiastical abstention doctrine.

Lagoa, B. and Scales, E., Associate Judges, concur.

      The Florida Supreme Court directed that this petition be reviewed and determined by a panel of judges from the Third District Court of Appeal sitting by designation as associate judges of the Fourth District Court of Appeal.

      Father Gallagher sought but was not assigned as pastor of St. Joan of Arc parish in 2009. With the diocese's permission, he took leave to take additional pastoral studies, and returned to ministry in December of 2013.

      The Code of Canon Law of the Catholic Church delineates the officials charged with care of the faithful in a parish. The pastor is the primary shepherd of the parish, and is generally appointed to the office for an indefinite term by the bishop. Parochial vicars are co-workers with the pastor of a parish and are assigned to assist in exercising pastoral ministry in the parish. The office of parochial administrator is the same as that of the pastor, but is usually a temporary position when the office of pastor is vacant. The bishop may later appoint the parochial administrator as pastor if the bishop deems the administrator qualified for the office.

      For example: (1) on January 26, 2016, in a Facebook post, the bishop's episcopal secretary said that Father Gallagher "is blatantly lying in his flawed 'recollection' of the facts," and "has managed to manipulate [a sex abuse interest group] in the web of lies that he continues to spread"; (2) the same day, in a Facebook post, the diocese lawyer said that Father Gallagher, "through a complete misrepresentation of the case of Father Jose Palimattom, has brought unfair and slanderous allegations against the Church"; (3) the same day, in electronic mail, the diocese chancellor was reported as saying that Father Gallagher's allegations are "untrue," and that he had "a history of problems for years and has been a troublemaker"; (4) on January 29, in a letter to parishioners, the bishop said Father Gallagher had made "unfounded allegations" and this was "another one of his fabrications which is causing harm to the Church"; and (5) on February 5, in an article in the Sun Sentinel , the bishop was reported to have said that Father Gallagher was "blatantly lying," made "unfounded allegations," and "erroneously assert[ed] [the diocese] tried to 'cover up' the inappropriate behavior of a visiting priest."

      For example: (1) on January 26, in a Facebook posting, the diocese lawyer said that Father Gallagher "has acted in a similar manner in other situations in the past"; (2) on January 26, in electronic mail, the diocese chancellor was reported as saying Father Gallagher "has a lot of rich people on his side because he has been doing them a lot of favors like remarrying without annulment"; and (3) on January 31, in an article in the Palm Beach Post , church personnel were reported as saying Father Gallagher was "spread[ing] lies about the Diocese because he was passed over for a promotion for at least a second time in six years," he "harass[ed] a Cuban priest ... prompting Hispanic parishioners to demand Gallagher's transfer," and he was "very upset and angry that he was not named pastor."

      For example: (1) on January 26, in a Facebook posting, the diocese lawyer said that Father Gallagher "is in need of professional assistance"; (2) on January 28, in an article in the Irish Central , the diocese is reported as saying "Father Gallagher ... is in need of professional assistance"; and (3) on January 31, in an article in the Palm Beach Post , Pastor Rodriguez said Father Gallagher "needs serious professional help."

      We cited approvingly to Goodman in affirming the dismissal of a defamation claim in Kond v. Mudryk , 769 So.2d 1073, 1078 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) ("Lastly, we affirm the trial court's dismissal of appellants' claims for slander. We agree with the trial court's conclusion that 'an adjudication of such claims would result in excessive government entanglement with church policies, procedures, practices, and bylaws,' contrary to the First Amendment. See Doe [v. Evans] , 718 So.2d [286] at 288 [ (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) ] ; Goodman , 712 So.2d at 777.").

      The ministerial exception is a close cousin to the ecclesiastical abstention doctrine. "The doctrine has parallels to the 'ministers exception' with which it shared the common feature of allowing churches to exercise their religious freedoms without governmental interference into its internal affairs." Flynn , 221 So.3d at 1246.


author: Gerber, C.J.

text:
    Chad E. CARTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D17-2485
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [June 13, 2018]
    Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Nancy Jack, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Paul Patti, III, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   Gerber, C.J.

The defendant appeals from the second and third of three sentencing orders which the circuit court issued following the defendant's violation of probation on count three. We affirm the second order without prejudice, and reverse the third order because the circuit court lacked jurisdiction.

On July 20, 2017, the circuit court entered the first order, sentencing the defendant on count three to seventy-two months' imprisonment with credit for 790 days served.

On August 1, 2017, the circuit court entered the second order, increasing the defendant's sentence on count three to eighty-four months' imprisonment with credit for 790 days served. The defendant, without filing a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 motion to correct sentencing error or otherwise objecting to the trial court, filed a notice of appeal with this court on the following day, to argue that the second order violated double jeopardy.

On August 31, 2017, while the defendant's appeal of the second order was pending, the circuit court entered a third order returning the defendant's sentence on count three to seventy-two months' imprisonment, but reducing the credit from 790 to 471 days served.

The defendant's initial brief followed.

The defendant argues the circuit court erred in entering the second order, because the second order violated double jeopardy. See State v. Akins , 69 So.3d 261, 269 (Fla. 2011) ("[O]nce a sentence has been imposed, the sentencing hearing has ended, and the defendant has begun to serve his sentence, the sentence may not thereafter be made more onerous, such as by extending the term of imprisonment.").

The defendant argues the circuit court erred in entering the third order for two reasons: (1) the defendant's notice of appeal of the second order divested the circuit court of jurisdiction to enter the third order, see Hicks v. State , 227 So.3d 135, 136 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017) ("[B]ecause appellant had already filed his notice of appeal, the trial court lacked jurisdiction to modify the sentence."); and (2) on the merits, "a trial court may not rescind jail credit that was previously awarded, even if the initial award was improper, because such an action violates double jeopardy." Stang v. State , 24 So.3d 566, 570 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009).

As to the second order, we are compelled to affirm because the defendant did not preserve the alleged error by bringing the alleged error to the circuit court's attention by objecting at the time of sentencing or by filing a rule 3.800 motion to correct sentencing error. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(e) ("A sentencing error may not be raised on appeal unless the alleged error has first been brought to the attention of the lower tribunal: (1) at the time of sentencing; or (2) by motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)."); Hobgood v. State , 166 So.3d 840, 845 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) ("A defendant must preserve a sentencing error by objecting at the time of sentencing or in a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b).") (citation and quotation marks omitted). Our affirmance is without prejudice for the defendant to file with the circuit court a rule 3.800 or rule 3.850 motion directed to the second order. See , e.g. , Martinez v. State , 211 So.3d 989, 992 (Fla. 2017) ("[A] sentence that has been unconstitutionally enhanced in violation of the double jeopardy clause is illegal and, therefore, may be corrected under rule 3.800(a).").

As to the third order, we agree with the defendant that because the defendant's appeal of the second order divested the circuit court of jurisdiction to enter the third order, we must reverse the third order. We therefore do not reach the merits of the defendant's argument that the third order violates double jeopardy.

Affirmed in part without prejudice; reversed in part.

Gross and Conner, JJ., concur.


author: Per Curiam. May J., dissenting.

text:
    Jose Luis BARAJAS, II, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D17-2218
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [July 5, 2018]
    Antony P. Ryan, Regional Counsel, Donald A. Chinquina, Assistant Regional Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, Fort Pierce, for appellant.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Don M. Rogers, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   Per Curiam.

Affirmed. See Hart v. State , 2018 WL 2049668 (Fla. 4th DCA May 2, 2018).

Gerber, C.J., and Damoorgian, J., concur.

May J., dissents with opinion.

May J., dissenting.

I dissent for the reasons set forth in Judge Warner's dissent in Hart v. State , 2018 WL 2049668 (Fla. 4th DCA May 2, 2018).


author: Per Curiam.

text:
    Bernard RAMKELAWAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-501
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [July 5, 2018]
    Bernard Ramkelawan, South Bay, pro se.
    No brief filed for appellee.
   Per Curiam.

The trial court's denial of appellant's "emergency motion to dismiss" shall be treated as a denial of a rule 3.850 motion. This appeal shall be redesignated as such and is affirmed.

Gross, Taylor and Damoorgian, JJ., concur.


text:
    David BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D17-2033
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [July 11, 2018]
    Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Nancy Jack, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Matthew Steven Ocksrider, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   Per Curiam.

Appellant was placed on probation for possession of PVP, a controlled substance commonly known as flakka. The trial court revoked appellant's probation after finding that he had willfully violated three conditions: a drug treatment condition and two payment conditions. Only the drug treatment violation was proven at the hearing, while the two payment conditions were not discussed at all. Appellant raises arguments on appeal regarding all three conditions. We find his argument as to the drug treatment violation without merit and affirm.

However, we remand because the trial court's revocation order improperly refers to the unproven payment condition violations. Because the trial court's revocation of probation is supported by evidence of one violation-the violation of the drug treatment condition-and it is "clear that the trial court would have revoked based solely on" that violation, we affirm. See Haygood v. State , 687 So.2d 318, 319 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). However, the revocation order should reflect only the violations actually proven, so we remand for the trial court to strike reference to the unproven violations of the payment conditions. See Matos v. State , 956 So.2d 1240, 1240 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007).

Affirmed and remanded with instructions.

Damoorgian, Levine and Kuntz, JJ., concur.


text:
    Irvin L. BENNETT, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT O/B/O Eolande Brianne HILL, Appellee.
    No. 4D17-1706
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [July 18, 2018]
    Irvin L. Bennett, Lauderhill, pro se.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carrie R. McNair, Assistant Attorney General, Child Support Enforcement, Tallahassee, for appellee.
   Per Curiam.

Affirmed without prejudice to appellant moving for modification. See Macias v. Dep't of Revenue , 16 So.3d 985 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) ; Miley v. Dep't of Revenue , 23 So.3d 1284 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).

Warner, May and Forst, JJ., concur.


text:
    FLORIDA PROPERTY RECEIVER FORCE, LLC, Appellant, v. PINEAPPLE PARK AT WOODMONT HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION, INC., and Bank of America, Appellees.
    No. 4D17-3727
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [July 18, 2018]
    Harold B. Klite Truppman and Eli L. Samet of Harold B. Klite Truppman, P.A., Miami, for appellant.
    Alexzander D. Gonano of Gonano & Harrell, Fort Pierce, and Avri S. Ben-Hamo and Steven B. Greenfield of Aldridge & Pite, LLP, Boca Raton, for appellee Bank of America.
   Per Curiam.

Affirmed. See U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. Quadomain Condo. Ass'n , 103 So.3d 977 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012).

Gross, Ciklin and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.