text:
    Austin Blake PIERCE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-1238
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    February 20, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


source: Caselaw Access Project

license: Public Domain

text:
    Daniel Shawn BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-1155
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    February 20, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Shawn Eric MURRAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-711
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    February 20, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Kenneth WRIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-4782
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    February 20, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Micheal GILMORE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-1673
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    February 21, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Eric Patrick LAFAVOR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-3755
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    February 21, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


author: Per Curiam.

text:
    Kevin L. CHRISTY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-2779
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    February 21, 2019
    Kevin L. Christy, pro se, Appellant.
    Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
   Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. Thomas, C.J., and Bilbrey and Jay, JJ., concur.


text:
    Stephen Lamont EARLY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-4417
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    February 20, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    David STRATTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-1734
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    February 21, 2019
    David Stratton, pro se, Appellant.
    Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
   Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED.

Lewis, Winsor, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.


text:
    Hozell COLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-1711
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    February 21, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Joseph Manuel COLON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-1710
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    February 21, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Wesley Alan MCHENRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-3036
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    February 21, 2019
    Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant; Wesley Alan McHenry, pro se, Appellant.
    Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
   Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Makar, Winokur, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.


text:
    Frederick STRAIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-3864
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    February 21, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Patrick WHITE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-2752
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    February 21, 2019
    Patrick White, pro se, Appellant.
    Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
   Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Rowe, Bilbrey, and Kelsey, JJ., concur.


text:
    Jesse BRANNEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-2667
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    February 21, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Gregory L. CURTIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-2468
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    February 21, 2019
    Gregory L. Curtis, pro se, Appellant.
    Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
   Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED.

Rowe, Bilbrey, and Kelsey, JJ., concur.


text:
    Reginald J. BOUIE Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-2282
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    February 21, 2019
    Reginald J. Bouie Jr., pro se, Appellant.
    Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, and Daniel Krumbholz, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
   Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED.

Roberts, Wetherell, and Makar, JJ., concur.


text:
    Vincent Alexander BROOK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-1957
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    February 21, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    David BAITY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-1826
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    February 21, 2019
    David Baity, pro se, Appellant.
    Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
   Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

B.L. Thomas, C.J., and Bilbrey and Jay, JJ., concur.


text:
    Dwayne MARTIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-1812
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    February 21, 2019
    Dwayne Martin, pro se, Appellant.
    Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Michael McDermott, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
   Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Wolf, Osterhaus, and Jay, JJ., concur.


text:
    Vinney TRIPP, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-3448
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    February 25, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Herman Lee FRYER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-3676
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    February 25, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Ryan E. CHENEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-3888
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    February 25, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Robert Donald MCCOLLUM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-3806
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    February 25, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    K.M., Natural Mother of C.R.D.M., N.M.M., J.E.M., and M.I.Z.M., Minor Children, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-4264
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    February 27, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    William Hakim BENTLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-3805
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    February 25, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Mauricio MEZA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-3765
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    February 25, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    James B. INGRAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-3584
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    February 25, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Jerome J. FERRIER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-3882
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    February 27, 2019
    Jerome Ferrier, pro se, for Appellant.
    Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, for Appellee.
   Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Wolf, Bilbrey, and Winsor, JJ., concur.


text:
    B.R., Father of S.R., Minor Child, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-3829
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    February 27, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Dexter FARMER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-5136
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    February 27, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Henry WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-4631
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    February 27, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    COLUMBIA BANK, Appellant, v. MARSH GROUP, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company; J.C. Marsh & Sons, Inc., a Florida Corporation; Francis S. Oosterhoudt, Also Known as F.S. Oosterhoudt, III; Lake City Management Group, Inc., a Florida Corporation; Michael B. Oosterhoudt; Lake City Development LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company; William J. Haley ; Thomas J. Haley; and GTE Federal Credit Union as Successor in Interest To North Florida Federal Credit Union, Appellees.
    No. 1D17-4152
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    February 27, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Terrence GLOVER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-4046
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    February 27, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Sylvio PARENT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D19-0265
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    February 27, 2019
    Sylvio Parent, pro se, Appellant.
    Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
   Per Curiam.

DISMISSED .

Rowe, Bilbrey, and Kelsey, JJ., concur.


text:
    Jesaiah MCNULTY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-481
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    February 27, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Barry HABER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-4819
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    February 27, 2019
    Chuck Hobbs, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
    Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, and Quentin Humphrey, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
   Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Rowe, Ray, and Osterhaus, JJ., concur.


text:
    Elizabeth Victoria AUTREY aka Elizabeth Victoria Broadnax, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-4059
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    February 27, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Robert Lee HOWARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-3983
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    February 27, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    ZALE CORPORATION and Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc., Appellants, v. Lidia PINEDA, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-0195
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    February 27, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Terrick LUNDY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-4542
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    February 27, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Francis W. PAYNE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-4444
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    February 27, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    David Lee FOREMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-4043
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    February 27, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Bud Christopher CHATMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-2941
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    February 27, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Madison D. SPAKOSKI, Appellant, v. REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION and Hard Rock Hotel & Casino Hollywood, Appellees.
    No. 1D18-632
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    March 11, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Erick U. GALICIA, Appellant, v. REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-342
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    March 11, 2019
    Erick Galicia, pro se, Appellant.
    Norman A. Blessing, General Counsel, Amanda L. Neff, Deputy General Counsel, and Cristina A. Velez, Appellate Counsel, Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
   Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Roberts, Kelsey, and Winsor, JJ., concur.


text:
    Yusuf SHABAZZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-4677
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    March 11, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Mark P. MONROE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-3791
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    March 1, 2019
    Mark P. Monroe, pro se, Appellant.
    Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
   Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED.

Lewis, Rowe, and Makar, JJ., concur.


text:
    Yusuf SHABAZZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-4676
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    March 11, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Javier MEDINA, Former Husband, Appellant, v. Katie MEDINA, k/n/a Katie Emerson, Former Wife, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-1935
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    March 11, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Brian CHIPMAN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-3593
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    February 11, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Granted.


text:
    Ava E. CANNIE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-2702
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    January 10, 2019 Rehearing Denied March 1, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    James Ray FRAZIER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-3421
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    February 14, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Granted.


text:
    Manuel LEBRON-JIMENEZ, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D19-0346
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    February 14, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Granted.


text:
    Donnie Lamar KELLY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D19-0010
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    February 12, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Jeremiah GAERTNER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Thomas M. KNIGHT, Sheriff, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D19-0257
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    February 12, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Amenhotep KALFANI, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-4381
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    February 14, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Belated appeal is granted.


text:
    Vincent RIVERA, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-5130
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    February 12, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Robert James SPEARS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D19-0246
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    February 12, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Jamel M. MCKENZIE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D19-0197
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    February 11, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Russell A. ROGERS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D19-0188
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    February 12, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Hubert Bradford LEEKS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-4117
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    February 12, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Granted.


text:
    Lester K. CAMPBELL, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-5054
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    February 12, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Tom BELL, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D19-0016
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    February 12, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Jessie WILLIAMS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-4777
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    February 14, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Granted.


text:
    Craig T. POPE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-4847
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    February 12, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Siosaia Lasike FONUA, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-5006
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    February 12, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Mark Stuart BROWN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D19-0249
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    February 11, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Rebecca HART, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Lee Jay HART, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D19-0227
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    February 27, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Appeal is dismissed.


text:
    Harry Martin WALSH, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-4097
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    February 14, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Granted.


text:
    May C. COLLINS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D19-0406
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    February 14, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Granted.


text:
    Donald Lawrence LASTRINA, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-4994
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    February 12, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Arthur A. GENOVESE, III, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D19-0655
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    February 28, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Garrett M. KERN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D19-0237
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    February 26, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Roger Marx DESENBERG, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-5129
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    February 13, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Jamie GEER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-1944
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    October 09, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.

Granted.


text:
    Teresa SERAFINE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Dean SERAFINE, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-5063
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 06, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Jason Eugene RITENOUR, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D19-0083
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    February 26, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Daniel MORGAN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D19-0435
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    February 26, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Mandamus is denied.


text:
    Clayteon Nathaniel STEEN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-3431
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    December 17, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Joshua ARENS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.:2D19-0198
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    February 26, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Petition is denied.


text:
    Heriberto RODRIGUEZ, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-4057
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    February 26, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Mandamus is denied.


text:
    Demetrias BROWN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Brandy Spear BROWN, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D19-0248
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    February 20, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Appeal is dismissed.


text:
    Brian METROCAVAGE, et al., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. The BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON f/k/a the Bank of New York, as Trustee, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D19-0313
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    February 07, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Christopher Scott THOMPSON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, o/b/o Carlee Nicole Ring, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-5015
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 06, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Appeal is dismissed.


text:
    Jerry SPEED, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D19-0440
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    February 26, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Mandamus is denied.


text:
    The STREMS LAW FIRM, P.A., Hunter Patterson, Esq. and Alicia Perez, Esq., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. AMERICAN SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY and Brenda Rodriguez, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-5021
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    February 26, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Appeal is dismissed.

Denied. Denied.


text:
    Chrisshawn ARRINGTON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-3393
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    February 26, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Becki Ruth MAAS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEUTSCHE BANK, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.:2D19-0107
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 15, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Stricken.


text:
    Tearra Lashe DAVIS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-4197
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    February 26, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Jason JEFFERSON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D19-0412
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    February 26, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Mandamus is denied.


text:
    Edward Alexander LOBATTO, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D19-0542
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    February 26, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Belated appeal is granted.


text:
    Tracy GROENENDAAL and Ronald Soriano, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. REFLECTION ISLES MASTER ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D19-0281
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    February 26, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Prohibition is denied. Motion to review is denied.


text:
    Kenneth S. COURTNEY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-0630
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    February 26, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Appeal is dismissed.


text:
    Daniel MAIER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Shawn MAIER, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D19-0111
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    February 20, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Appeal is dismissed.


text:
    Henry J. KUHLMAN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. HARDEE COUNTY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, et al, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-0713
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    February 07, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    SIC PRODUCTS, LLC d/b/a SIC Cups, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. TERVIS TUMBLER COMPANY, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D19-0117
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 5, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Derek D. DURANT, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D19-0318
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    February 26, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Michael Henry BRONISZ, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Jacqueline BRONISZ, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D19-0116
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    February 20, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Zayne WILLIAMS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D19-0212
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    February 13, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Michael Anthony WILLIAMS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-3117
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 29, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    A.T., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D19-0072
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    February 21, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    B. Joseph GRIFFITH and Jill S. Griffith, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. WELLINGTON CHASE HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION, INC., et al, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D19-0201
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    February 21, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Jeremias V. GOMEZ, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-3955
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    January 18, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Jose Matos UPTON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-4015
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    April 03, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Earl BUTLER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Keith A. PETERSON, Esq., et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D19-0936
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 27, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    REGIONS BANK as Successor to Amsouth Bank, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Elizabeth A. PETRILLO, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D19-0633
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 18, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Appeal is dismissed.


text:
    Jason YOUNG and Sun Young, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-2012
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 14, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    UNKNOWN HEIR n/k/a Jewell Smith Kolosoff, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST CO., as Trustee, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-3638
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 14, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Len GALE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., as Trustee, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-5072
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 14, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Granted. Vacated. Granted. Appeal is dismissed.


text:
    Thomas M. HARVEY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. GALILEO HOSPITALITY GROUP, INC., et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D19-0153
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 14, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Cynthia PERDUM, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Maria Leonor GERHOLDT, Mary Joe McGowan, Crystal Moore and Susan Straatmann, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-3542
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 13, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Christian John RYBURN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-4220
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    April 03, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Nathaniel R. BRAZILL, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D19-0328
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    April 3, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Appeal is dismissed.


text:
    Doctor R. CRANTS, et al., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. LCS CORRECTIONS SERVICES, INC., et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-4859
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    April 03, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    THANH-THUY THI LE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATION TRUST CO., as Trustee, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D19-0554
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 14, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Annique LESAGE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D19-0480
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    April 3, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Jerome NUBIN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D19-0451
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    February 07, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Andrew JOSEPH, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D19-0166
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    February 07, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Bruce Paul Douglas STODDART, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-2779
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    November 27, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    NORTH POINTE AT SUNCOAST CROSSING OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. and the Hogan Group, Inc., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Donald A. DOBSON and Noelene Dobson, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D19-1159
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    April 08, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Appeal is dismissed.


text:
    Fletcher L. MCKINNEY & Nancy McKinney, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. BRANCH BANKING & TRUST COMPANY, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-3465
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 29, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed. Denied.


text:
    Danny Levon BROWN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D19-0555
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 6, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Christina PAYLAN, M.D., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Joseph G. ALVAREZ, Esq., Nicholas Matassini, Esq. & The Matassini Law Firm, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-1830
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    February 28, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Robert Pernell PILCHER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-4976
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    April 08, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    George Edward JACKSON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D19-0077
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 29, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Kimberly JOHNSON, et al., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A., Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-2264
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 14, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Walter LICHTENBERG, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Darcy O'BERRY-HIGBEE, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D19-0302
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 14, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    IN RE: the INTEREST OF: F.N., I.O., Jr., and T.O., Appellant/Petitioner(s)
    CASE NO.: 2D19-0958
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    April 01, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Earl BUTLER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Leighton G. MORSE, Esq., et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D19-0937
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 27, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.

Transferred.


text:
    Katrina TUCKER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A., et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-5032
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 14, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Ernesto OLIVERA-SANTIAGO, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-3135
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    February 06, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    William S. NEMITZ and Debra G. Nemitz, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-4713
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    April 08, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    LAKE AVENUE SOUTH EAST REAL ESTATE, LLC, et al., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. CENTERSTATE BANK, N. A., Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D19-0863
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    April 03, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismiss.


text:
    Obinna NWOBI, M.D., MPH, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Barbara STELLER as Personal Representative of the Estate of Michael L. Steller, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D19-0289
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 13, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Leandre SCOTT, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-4808
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    January 31, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Rockford Lewis UPTON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-4241
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    April 03, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Jamison Ray JOHNSON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-4642
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    April 03, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Gary L. WOODROFFE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE, a/k/a Fannie Mae, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D19-0666
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    February 26, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    SHUMAKER, LOOP & KENDRICK, LLP, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. ALPS SOUTH, LLC, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-3005
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    October 22, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied. Denied.


text:
    Nathaniel MIXON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-3691
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 6, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Star TRIBBLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-4667
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 6, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Damien ROSS, Doc #S05502, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D18-1122
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 6, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Thomas GORDON, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D18-1623
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 6, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Michael HALEY, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D18-2132
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 6, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


author: PER CURIAM.

text:
    Steven A. MCLEOD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D18-2214
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 6, 2019
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, MORRIS, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.


text:
    Lewis WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D18-2335
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 6, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Victor Lamar DOZIER, Doc #C06165, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D18-26
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 6, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Shameka Daniel MORRIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D18-3272
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 6, 2019.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Eric Mentail ANDERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D18-3286
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 6, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Cesar A. CONTRERAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D18-3317
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 6, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Germaine SMALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D18-702
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 6, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Edward Walter MEEKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-3537
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 6, 2019
    Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Matthew J. Salvia, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
    Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and David Campbell, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, C.J., and SILBERMAN and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.


text:
    Dakota Blayze OVERSTREET, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-4496
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 6, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    James P. ZUCALLO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D18-1070
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 6, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Jerome NUBIN, Appellant, v. Frank SCHWARTZ, Administrator of South Florida Evaluation and Treatment Center, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D18-1240
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 6, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Robert ROLLINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D18-1941
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 6, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    David JIMENEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D18-2180
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 6, 2019
    David Jimenez, pro se.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

VILLANTI, SLEET, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.


text:
    Archie J. HINES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D18-2198
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 6, 2019
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, MORRIS, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.


text:
    Daniel WALTERS, III, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D18-2199
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 6, 2019
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, MORRIS, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.


text:
    James Christopher COLE, Doc #S06972, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D18-2326
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 6, 2019
    James Christopher Cole, pro se.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KHOUZAM, MORRIS, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.


text:
    Barry TUCKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D18-2763
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 6, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    John Jerome SPEIGHTS, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D18-3116
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 6, 2019
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See State v. Drawdy, 136 So. 3d 1209 (Fla. 2014) ; Hughes v. State, 22 So. 3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) ; Carlyle v. State, 945 So. 2d 540 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) ; Coughlin v. State, 932 So. 2d 1224 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (en banc); Shortridge v. State, 884 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) ; Brown v. State, 827 So. 2d 1054 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) ; Schwenn v. State, 898 So. 2d 1130 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005).

SILBERMAN, VILLANTI, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.


text:
    Marshall Runae PORTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D18-3289
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 6, 2019
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Porter v. State, 185 So. 3d 1245 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015) (table decision); Porter v. State, 163 So. 3d 1199 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) (table decision); Porter v. State, 126 So. 3d 1063 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (table decision); Porter v. State, 63 So. 3d 766 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (table decision); Porter v. State, 54 So. 3d 982 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (table decision).

SILBERMAN, VILLANTI, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.


text:
    Ralph D. WRIGHT, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D18-747
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 6, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Randy L. SPARKLIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D18-818
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 6, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    James R. BARNES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D18-855
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 6, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Cleturs SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D18-882
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 6, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Benjamin PRESS, Appellant, v. NPC INTERNATIONAL, INC., a for Profit Corporation, and Ridge Road Center, LLC, Appellees.
    Case No. 2D18-963
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 6, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Robert Michael MOUNCE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D18-2040
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 6, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Thomas RASK, Appellant, v. Bob GUALTIERI, in His Official Capacity as Sheriff of Pinellas County, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D18-2463
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 6, 2019.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Devon BOWEN, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D18-562
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed March 6, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Justin D. TRAXINGER, Appellant, v. Ashley Ann GARCIA, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-2817
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [January 31, 2019]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Raymond RAMIREZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-2823
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [January 31, 2019]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Daniel DIVICH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-3219
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [January 31, 2019]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Eugene COOPER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-3056
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [December 27, 2018]
    Eugene Cooper, Okeechobee, pro se.
    No appearance required for appellee.
   Per Curiam.

Affirmed.

Gerber, C.J., May and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.


text:
    Nelson Eaton JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-3279
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [February 7, 2019]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Marcelo ESCOBAR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-3519
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [February 7, 2019]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Deitrick JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-3518
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [February 7, 2019]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed,


text:
    Charly COLES, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-3530
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [February 7, 2019]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Michael J. MILLS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-2960
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [February 7, 2019]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Radames VELAZQUEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-3298
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [February 7, 2019]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Areci ROBLEDO, Appellant, v. State of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-997
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [February 7, 2019]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    FINANCIAL TRADE PARTNERS, LLC, Appellant, v. OCEANIC AEREO, LLC, Eduardo Gomez and Soranela Cunha, Appellees.
    No. 4D18-2851
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    February 14, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Tyvonn M. SCOTT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-2687
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [February 14, 2019]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Ronald MCFADDEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-3101
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [February 14, 2019]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Charles Allen FOX, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-3108
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [February 14, 2019]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    J.W., The Father, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES and Guardian Ad Litem Program, Appellees.
    No. 4D18-3316
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [February 14, 2019]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Gibson PAUL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-3341
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [February 14, 2019]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Diamond Joneal ALLEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-3472
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [February 14, 2019]
    Diamond Joneal Allen, Lake City, pro se.
    No appearance required for appellee.
   Per Curiam.

Affirmed.

Damoorgian, Levine and Kuntz, JJ., concur.


text:
    Nathaniel KIMBROUGH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-3638
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [February 14, 2019]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Vernet SEJOUR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-3190
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [February 14, 2019]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Jimmy K. BONEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-3340
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [February 14, 2019]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Roy O. DANIELS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-3648
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [February 14, 2019]
    Roy O. Daniels, Raiford, pro se.
    No appearance required of appellee.
   Per Curiam.

Affirmed.

Gerber, C.J., Conner and Forst, JJ., concur.


text:
    Raymond SORIA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-3787
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [February 14, 2019]
    Raymond Soria, Cross City, pro se.
    No appearance required for appellee.
   Per Curiam.

Affirmed.

Gerber, C.J., Ciklin and Kuntz, JJ., concur.


text:
    Conrad THITCHENER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-143
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    February 21, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    N.A.A., a Child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D17-3307
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [February 21, 2019]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Timothy Arnell WHITE Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-484
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [February 21, 2019]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    S.A., the Mother and K.M., the Father, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.
    Nos. 4D18-3253 4D18-3398
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [February 18, 2019]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Derrick JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D17-2315
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [February 28, 2019]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Brack JASKEY, Appellant, v. Simon REYNOLDS, Ian Drewe, and Applied Efforts, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Appellees.
    No. 4D17-2080
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [February 28, 2019]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Rolando Crespin AYALA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D17-3263
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [February 28, 2019]
    V.J. Benincasa of Benincasa Law Firm, P.A., Vero Beach, for appellant.
    Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Anesha Worthy, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   Per Curiam.

Affirmed.

Damoorgian, Forst and Kuntz, JJ., concur.


text:
    N.A.A., a Child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D17-3308
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [February 28, 2019]
    Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Virginia Murphy, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeanine Germanowicz, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   Per Curiam.

Affirmed.

May, Ciklin and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.


text:
    Frederick SCIRE, Appellant, v. Nicole HOCHMAN, Appellee.
    No. 4D17-3618
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [March 7, 2019]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    INTERNATIONAL VILLAGE ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellant, v. Raymond PHILLIPS, Dawn Phillips and Cristobal Padron, Appellees.
    No. 4D18-736
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [March 7, 2019]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    EUROPA BY-THE-SEA CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellant, v. DELRADO, INC. d/b/a El Dorado Club, the Palm Yacht & Beach Club, Inc., James Edmondson, and Town of Lauderdale By-The-Sea, Florida, Appellees.
    No. 4D18-447
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [February 28, 2019]
    Richard L. Petrovich and Stephanie C. Mazzola of Tripp Scott, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
    John H. Pelzer of Greenspoon Marder, P.A., Fort Lauderdale for appellees Delrado, Inc. d/b/a El Dorado Club, The Palm Yacht & Beach Club, Inc., and James Edmondson.
    Laura K. Wendell, Susan L. Trevarthen, and Daniel L. Abbott of Weiss Serota Helfman Cole & Bierman, P.L., Fort Lauderdale for appellee Town of Lauderdale By-The-Sea, Florida.
   Per Curiam.

Affirmed.

May, Ciklin and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.


text:
    Charly COLES, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-3529
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [January 31, 2019]
    Charly Coles, Florida City, pro se.
    No appearance required for appellee.
   Per Curiam.

Affirmed.

Warner, Ciklin and Levine, JJ., concur.


text:
    Chancy MALLORY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-3224
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [January 31, 2019]
    Chancy Mallory, Bristol, pro se.
    No appearance required for appellee.
   Per Curiam.

Affirmed.

Ciklin, Forst and Kuntz, JJ., concur.


text:
    Anthony ROBERTS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-3514
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    January 24, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Darryl CAREY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-3246
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [January 17, 2019]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Rayon PAYNE, Appellant, v. Sandra KOCH, Individually and o/b/o C.P., a Child, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-2736
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed February 5, 2019 Rehearing Denied February 25, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    R.C. THOMAS a/k/a Robert Thomas, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-3545
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [January 31, 2019]
    R.C. Thomas, Lake City, pro se.
    No appearance required for appellee.
   Per Curiam.

Affirmed .

Damoorgian, Conner and Forst, JJ., concur.


text:
    Anthawn MORRIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-3555
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [January 31, 2019]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    R.P., Father of J.P. and C.P., Children, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-3146
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed February 20, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Sean BOGLE, Esquire, as Personal Representative, Appellant, v. William Isaac NICHOLS, Beech Outdoor Company d/b/a Beech Outdoor Advertising Inc., Sims Crane & Equipment Co., Sign Service and Installations, Inc., et al., Appellees.
    Case No. 5D17-2918
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed February 19, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, Appellant, v. Lloyd F. BEHRENDT a/k/a Lloyd Francis Behrendt a/k/a Lloyd Francis Christopher Behrendt Individually and as Trustee of the Lloyd Francis Behrendt Trust U.T.D. 11th Day of August 2002, et al., Appellees.
    Case No. 5D17-2445
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed February 19, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Krista Marie TAYLOR, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE O/B/O Ruth Ann TEUTON, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-2410
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed February 19, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Samuel Q. WOODEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D19-45
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed February 26, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    William A. CARPENTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-3962
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed February 26, 2019 Rehearing Denied March 25, 2019
    William A. Carpenter, Chipley, pro se.
    No Appearance for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EVANDER, C.J., ORFINGER and BERGER, JJ., concur.


text:
    Karen O'LEARY, Appellant, v. James J. TRENT, Holly Kenney and Martha Smith, as Guardian of Marie O. Stokes, Appellees.
    Case No. 5D18-1325
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed February 19, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    SOVEREIGN HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS, LLC., Sovereign Healthcare of Orlando, LLC., Southern Healthcare Management, LLC., Sovereign Healthcare Disbursements, LLC., Tristan S. Mohadeo, et al., Appellants, v. The ESTATE OF Maria M. RAMOS-CRUZ BY AND THROUGH Odemaris JIMENEZ, Personal Representative, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-652
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed February 19, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Edward Dane JEFFUS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-3563
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed February 26, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Richard D. HORTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-3228
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed February 26, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Peter SMITH, Appellant, v. Michelle SMITH, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-3136
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed February 26, 2019
    Clifton H. Gorenflo, of Gray, Gorenflo & Partlow, P.A., Sanford, for Appellant.
    No Appearance for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EVANDER, C.J., COHEN and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.


text:
    Jimmy KIMBROUGH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-2864
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed February 26, 2019
    Jimmy Kimbrough, Raiford, pro se.
    Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robin A. Compton, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EDWARDS, EISNAUGLE and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.


text:
    Arzy RICHARDSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-2697
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed February 26, 2019
    Arzy Richardson, Lake City, pro se.
    Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carmen F. Corrente, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

HARRIS, GROSSHANS and SASSO, JJ., concur.


text:
    Ritchy BIEN-AIME, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-970
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed February 26, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Darryl Wayne PATTERSON, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-403
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed February 26, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Rodriquez V. WEATHERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-3828
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed February 26, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    J.C.A., a Child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-2237
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed February 26, 2019
    James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Scott G. Hubbard, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
    Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and, Carmen F. Corrente, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LAMBERT, EDWARDS and SASSO, JJ., concur.


text:
    Leroy Vijay GIBSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-571
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed February 26, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Clifford Earl KING, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-3104
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed February 26, 2019
    James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Ailene S. Rogers, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
    Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Nora Hutchinson Hall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

BERGER, EDWARDS and SASSO, JJ., concur.


text:
    Antonio Deyelle WHITE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-3484
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed February 26, 2019
    Kendell K. Ali, of Ali & Blankner, Orlando, for Appellant.
    No Appearance for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER, EDWARDS and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.


text:
    Shannon Lee VALRIE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-1170
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed February 26, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Rose IRONS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-3968
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed February 26, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Frederick J. FRAZIER, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-2760
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed February 26, 2019
    James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Glendon G. Gordon, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
    Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Lori N. Hagan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

COHEN, WALLIS and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.


text:
    Colleen FALK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-2356
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed February 26, 2019
    James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Danielle R. Rufai, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
    Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Nora Hutchinson Hall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

COHEN, LAMBERT and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.


text:
    James R. KOEPKE, Appellant, v. Robert G. DELLO RUSSO, Wilson A. Knott, 11100 East Colonial, Inc. and Gregory Hastings, Appellees.
    Case No. 5D18-2341
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed February 26, 2019
    James R. Koepke, Orlando, pro se.
    Tucker H. Byrd and Scottie N. McPherson, of Byrd Campbell, P.A., Winter Park, for Appellees Robert G. Dello Russo and 11100 East Colonial, Inc.
    No Appearance for Other Appellees.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

COHEN, LAMBERT and HARRIS, JJ., concur.


text:
    Jerry ROBINSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-2181
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed February 26, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Michael MOODY, Appellant, v. Melissa RAMSAWAK, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-2007
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed February 26, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Timothy Lee MARCUM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-1721
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed February 26, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    DeForest KELLY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-909
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed February 26, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Charles Lamont CASEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-3009
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed January 15, 2019 Rehearing Denied February 20, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Jose N. GARCIA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-2560
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed January 15, 2019 Rehearing Denied February 20, 2019
    Jose N. Garcia, Graceville, pro se.
    Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Rock McGuigan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

BERGER and HARRIS, JJ., and JACOBUS, B.W., Senior Judge, concur.


text:
    Stacy TAYLOR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-956
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed January 15, 2019 Rehearing Denied February 22, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Dr. Usha JAIN and Manohar Jain, Appellants, v. David BARKER, Mary Beth Valley, Michael Furbush and Roetzel and Andress, P.A., Appellees.
    Case No. 5D18-1215
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed January 22, 2019 Rehearing Denied February 27, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Angel CARABALLO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-657
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed January 15, 2019 Rehearing Denied February 22, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Robert BELLANTONIO, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Eileen Bellantonio, Appellant, v. SOUTHWEST VOLUSIA HEALTHCARE CORPORATION D/B/A Florida Hospital Fish Memorial and Memorial Health Systems, Inc., D/B/A Florida Health Oceanside, Appellees.
    Case No. 5D18-0451
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed January 15, 2019 Rehearing Denied February 15, 2019
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


author: Gerber, C.J.

text:
    Gerald A. PAUL, AS TRUSTEE OF the GERALD A. PAUL REVOCABLE TRUST, and The Gerald A. Paul Revocable Trust, Appellants, v. Gadi AVRAHAMI and Andrew Paul, Appellees.
    No. 4D18-1461
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [February 20, 2019]
    Ronald M. Gaché and Scott A. Simon of Shapiro, Fishman & Gaché, LLP, Boca Raton, for appellant.
    Roderick F. Coleman, Boca Raton, for appellee Gadi Avrahami.
   Gerber, C.J.

We affirm the trial court's denial of appellants' request to recover their appellate attorney's fees arising from their successful first appeal in this case, described more fully in Paul v. Avrahami , 216 So.3d 647 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017).

By appellants' own admission, appellants had no basis to file a motion for appellate attorney's fees in the first appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.400(b) on the ground that appellee's response to the first appeal was frivolous or in bad faith, because such a ground is not permissible for recovery under rule 9.400(b). See Fla. R. App. P. 9.400(b)(1) ("With the exception of motions filed pursuant to rule 9.410(b) , a motion for attorneys' fees shall state the grounds on which recovery is sought and shall be served not later than ... the time for service of the reply brief ....") (emphasis added); Jarrette Bay Inv. Corp. v. BankUnited, N.A. , 207 So.3d 345, 347 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016) ("According to the plain language of [Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure] 9.410(b), parties seeking appellate fees as a sanction pursuant to section 57.105 are required to proceed pursuant to rule 9.410(b), not rule 9.400(b). Indeed, the prefatory clause of rule 9.400(b) -the procedural rule governing fees with a basis other than section 57.105-expressly makes the rule inapplicable to motions proceeding under rule 9.410(b).").

Also, as is undisputed from the record, this court did not enter an award of appellate attorney's fees on its own motion in the first appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.410(a) ("After 10 days' notice, on its own motion, the court may impose sanctions for any violation of these rules, or for the filing of any proceeding, motion, brief, or other paper that is frivolous or in bad faith. Such sanctions may include ... attorneys' fees, or other sanctions.").

That leaves Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.410(b), which permits a party to "seek[ ] an award of attorneys' fees as a sanction against another party or its counsel pursuant to general law." Fla. R. App. P. 9.410(b)(1). Rule 9.410(b) (2018) provides, in pertinent part:

(3) Initial Service . A copy of a motion for attorneys' fees as a sanction must initially be served only on the party against whom sanctions are sought. That motion shall be served no later than the time for serving any permitted response to a challenged paper or, if no response is permitted as of right, within 15 days after a challenged paper is served or a challenged claim, defense, contention, allegation, or denial is made at oral argument....
(4) Filing and Final Service . If the challenged paper, claim, defense, contention, allegation, or denial is not withdrawn or appropriately corrected within 21 days after initial service of the motion under subdivision (3), the movant may file the motion for attorneys' fees as a sanction with the court (a) no later than the time for service of the reply brief, if applicable, or (b) no later than 45 days after initial service of the motion, whichever is later.

(emphasis added).

In the first appeal, appellants did not serve a motion for appellate attorney's fees under rule 9.410(b) in response to appellee's answer brief, i.e., the "challenged paper." Thus, appellants waived their opportunity to seek their appellate attorney's fees as a sanction under rule 9.410(b).

Appellants' initial brief here argues that they could not have served a motion for appellate attorney's fees under rule 9.410(b). According to appellants:

[W]hile the Answer Brief is the only substantive "paper" [appellee] filed in the [first appeal], [appellants] did not "challenge" it under Fla. R. App. P. 9.410 [ (b) ](4) because [appellants] did not believe [the answer brief] was so devoid of merit as to warrant sanctions for its filing on its own, especially considering the low rate of filing and success of appeals of denials of § 57.105 motions (and corresponding limited case law on the subject). After all, since [appellants] were the ones appealing the trial court's [ ] Order, [appellee] seemed to have a reasonable basis to accept the trial court's ruling and oppose the [first appeal].
Moreover, by the time [appellee] filed his Answer Brief, [appellants] had already incurred most of their appellate attorneys' fees in reviewing, researching and drafting their Initial Brief, such that any Rule 9.410 motion they might have filed at that time could have only resulted in the recovery of the fees they incurred in their preparation of their Reply Brief. In that case, despite raising the same frivolous (and sanctionable) arguments in both the trial court and this Court, [appellee] could never be liable for the most significant attorneys' fees [which appellants] incurred in opposing those arguments, i.e. , the attorneys' fees they incurred on their Initial Brief.
Taking it one step further, what if [appellants] had served a Rule 9.410 motion and, in response, [appellee] actually withdrew his [Answer Brief] within the 21-day safe harbor period? In that instance, too, [appellants] would not be able to recover any of the fees they incurred in preparing their Initial Brief, as that is the whole point of the "safe harbor" period.
Thus, under any possible scenario, [appellants] could not have properly filed a Rule 9.410 motion directed to [appellee's] one and only "challenged paper," i.e. , his Answer Brief, in the [first appeal], which would have enabled them to recover their [appellate attorneys'] fees [as a sanction] for the [first appeal]. Understandably, it appears Rule 9.410 was not designed to address this type of situation, where the losing party below asserts the winning party's entire position on appeal is sanctionable. It is for this reason there was simply no motion [which appellants] could have filed in this Court [in the first appeal] that would have assured them their ability to recover their [appellate attorney's] fees [as a sanction] for the [first appeal].

(emphasis in original).

We disagree with appellants' argument as applied in this case. While we appreciate appellants' candor in recognizing that appellee's answer brief in the first appeal may not have been "so devoid of merit as to warrant sanctions for its filing on its own," that answer brief was the only "challenged paper" available in the first appeal in response to which appellants could have served and filed a rule 9.410(b) motion for appellate attorney's fees as a sanction. Although appellants' choice not to have served and filed a rule 9.410(b) motion may or may not have been the correct choice, appellants were bound by that choice, resulting in the waiver of their opportunity to seek their appellate attorney's fees as a sanction under rule 9.410(b).

If appellants had served and filed a rule 9.410(b) motion, then the questions of whether we would have granted such a motion, and if granted, what appellate attorney's fees as a sanction we could have awarded, would have been ripe for our consideration. See Boca Burger, Inc. v. Forum , 912 So.2d 561, 571 (Fla. 2005) ("[A]ppellate counsel ... has an independent ethical obligation to present both the facts and the applicable law accurately and forthrightly. This will sometimes require appellate counsel to concede error where, although trial counsel obtained a favorable result, either the facts were not as represented to the trial court or the law is clearly contrary to the appellee's position and no good-faith basis exists to argue that it should be changed.").

However, those questions must go unanswered in this case. In this case, because this court, in the first appeal, did not enter an award of appellate attorney's fees under rule 9.400(b), 9.410(a), or 9.410(b), the trial court, on remand of the case following the first appeal, was correct in denying appellants' request to recover its appellate attorney's fees arising from the first appeal.

Affirmed.

Ciklin and Kuntz, JJ., concur.

      Rule 9.410's current version, effective January 1, 2019, contains minor modifications to subsections (a) and (b) which are not material to this opinion.


text:
    FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION and Roberto Nick Charria, Appellants, v. David Alan SIMS, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-1154
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [February 20, 2019]
    David P. Herman and Michael G. Shannon of Murray, Morin & Herman, P.A., Coral Gables, for appellants.
    Diana Santa Maria, Carolyn B. Anderson, and Laura D. Dolin of Law Offices of Diana Santa Maria, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.
   Gerber, C.J.

The defendants' attorneys appeal from the circuit court's order directing them to pay the plaintiff's attorney's fees under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.380(a)(4), as part of the circuit court's "Order on Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Better Answers to Interrogatories and Motion to Compel Designation of Corporate Representative, and Defendants' Objections to Plaintiff's Discovery Requests." The defendants' attorneys argue, among other things, that the circuit court erred in entering the attorney's fees order because the defendants' objections were substantially justified. We agree with the defendants' attorneys' argument. We reverse that portion of the order directing the defendants' attorneys to pay the plaintiff's attorney's fees.

Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.380(a)(4) states:

(4) Award of Expenses of Motion. If the motion [to compel] is granted and after opportunity for hearing, the court shall require the party or deponent whose conduct necessitated the motion or the party or counsel advising the conduct to pay to the moving party the reasonable expenses incurred in obtaining the order that may include attorneys' fees, unless the court finds that the movant failed to certify in the motion that a good faith effort was made to obtain the discovery without court action, that the opposition to the motion was substantially justified, or that other circumstances make an award of expenses unjust . If the motion is denied and after opportunity for hearing, the court shall require the moving party to pay to the party or deponent who opposed the motion the reasonable expenses incurred in opposing the motion that may include attorneys' fees, unless the court finds that the making of the motion was substantially justified or that other circumstances make an award of expenses unjust. If the motion is granted in part and denied in part, the court may apportion the reasonable expenses incurred as a result of making the motion among the parties and persons.

(emphasis added).

The circuit court, both at the hearing on the plaintiff's motion to compel, and in the order resulting from the hearing, incorrectly referred to rule 1.380(a)(4) as a "prevailing party" rule, even though rule 1.380(a)(4) uses no such phrase. For example, at the hearing, the circuit court stated: "[I]t's pursuant to 1.380, prevailing party gets the expenses of the motion." (emphasis added). Later at the hearing, the circuit court stated, "So, [plaintiff's counsel is] the prevailing party and she's going to get her costs and fees." (emphasis added). In the order, the circuit court stated: "[T]he court shall impose fees and costs to the prevailing party pursuant to Rule 1.380." (emphasis added). Later in the order, the circuit court stated: "The Court finds that the Plaintiff is a prevailing party for this matter and pursuant to Rule 1.380 [ (a) ](4) is entitled to fees and costs." (emphasis added).

The circuit court apparently misinterpreted rule 1.380(a)(4) as a "prevailing party" rule because of the rule's use of the word "shall" in the first sentence's first clause: "If the motion [to compel] is granted and after opportunity for hearing, the court shall require the party or deponent whose conduct necessitated the motion or the party or counsel advising the conduct to pay to the moving party the reasonable expenses incurred in obtaining the order that may include attorneys' fees ...." (emphasis added). For example, at the hearing on the plaintiff's motion to compel, the circuit court sua sponte raised rule 1.380(a)(4) and stated: "The rule says I shall impose [the expenses of the motion] unless the interests of justice indicate otherwise. Everything here was objected to. Some of the objections were well-founded, but some weren't." (emphasis added). Later in the hearing, the court's focus on the word "shall" was more narrow: "[The rule] doesn't say may get, it says, shall get." (emphasis added).

However, the circuit court's narrow focus on the single word "shall" in the first sentence's first clause appears to have minimized, if not eliminated, the court's consideration of the first sentence's second clause: "unless the court finds that the movant failed to certify in the motion that a good faith effort was made to obtain the discovery without court action, that the opposition to the motion was substantially justified , or that other circumstances make an award of expenses unjust." (emphasis added).

The circuit court's minimization of the first sentence's second clause is apparent from the face of its written order, which ultimately ignored that second clause. That is, the circuit court's written order made no finding regarding whether the defendants' opposition to the motion was substantially justified. Rather, as we stated above, the circuit court's written order appears to have awarded the plaintiff's attorney's fees and costs simply because, in the circuit court's view, the plaintiff was the "prevailing party" on the motion. That was error. Cf. Shaw v. State ex rel. Butterworth , 616 So.2d 1094 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993) ("If defendants were correct in their argument that attorney's fees must be assessed, where a party denies a request to admit a fact which is the central issue of fact in the case, prevailing party attorney's fees would become the rule, rather than the exception .") (emphasis added).

Even if we were to assume that the circuit court implicitly considered the first sentence's second clause and found that the defendants' opposition to the motion was not substantially justified, the record belies such a finding. As the circuit court itself stated at the hearing, "Some of the objections were well-founded, but some weren't." That finding is reflected in the written order, which found that certain interrogatories were overly broad or sought work product obtained in anticipation of litigation, and that certain requests for production sought documents which may have been protected as privileged, trade secrets, or confidential business information. Despite those findings, the circuit court awarded the plaintiff's attorney every dollar for every hour spent on the motion, with the only explanation in the written order being that the plaintiff was the "prevailing party." This erroneous view of the law constitutes an abuse of discretion. See Rush v. Burdge , 141 So.3d 764, 766 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) ("A trial court ... abuses its discretion if its ruling is based on an erroneous view of the law or on a clearly erroneous assessment of the evidence.") (citation and internal quotation marks omitted omitted).

Based on the foregoing, we reverse that portion of the circuit court's "Order on Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Better Answers to Interrogatories and Motion to Compel Designation of Corporate Representative, and Defendants' Objections to Plaintiff's Discovery Requests" directing the defendants' attorneys to pay the plaintiff's attorney's fees.

Reversed.

Ciklin and Kuntz, JJ., concur.


author: May, J.

text:
    Addarryll DORSEY Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D17-3617
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [February 20, 2019]
    Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and David John McPherrin, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeanine Germanowicz, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   May, J.

The defendant challenges his forty-year sentence for robbery with a firearm after revocation of his community control in case number 13CF5879. At the time he violated his community control, the defendant was twenty years old. He now argues that his sentence is invalid because it fails to provide for judicial review under chapter 2014-220, Laws of Florida, as codified in sections 775.082, 921.1401, and 921.1402, Florida Statutes. We disagree and affirm. We remand, however, for the trial court to correct scrivener's errors in the written revocation orders in case numbers 12CF13654, 13CF0050, 13CF5437, and 13CF5879.

There are three reasons why the defendant is not entitled to resentencing. First, because the defendant was no longer a minor at the time he violated community control, he was not entitled to sentencing under chapter 2014-220, Laws of Florida. See Davis v. State , 223 So.3d 1106, 1109 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017).

Second, the defendant's forty-year sentence comports with Graham v. Florida , 560 U.S. 48, 130 S.Ct. 2011, 176 L.Ed.2d 825 (2010), and Miller v. Alabama , 567 U.S. 460, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012). Recently, our supreme court held that a sentence with the possibility of parole is sufficient to provide juvenile offenders a meaningful opportunity for release, and the sentence does not violate the Eighth Amendment under Graham and Miller . State v. Michel , 257 So.3d 3 (Fla. 2018). Here, the defendant has been given a meaningful opportunity for release.

Third, the defendant's forty-year sentence was imposed after he had been released from prison on community control. Thus, he had already been given more than an opportunity for release and cannot subsequently show a violation of the Eighth Amendment under Graham . See Rogers v. State , 223 So.3d 281, 282 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017) ("A juvenile offender who has actually been released from a prison sentence has received more than what Graham requires.").

There are, however, scrivener's errors in the written revocation orders that the State agrees should be corrected. The trial court found the defendant violated community control by committing attempted armed robbery rather than armed robbery as was charged in the affidavits of violation. Nonetheless, the court's revocation orders reflect the defendant violated community control by committing armed robbery. Thus, the written order is inconsistent with the trial court's oral pronouncement.

The trial court also found the defendant did not violate community control by being in a place where he was not supposed to be. Yet the revocation orders include that allegation as a violation.

We therefore remand the case for the correction of these scrivener's errors where the written revocation orders list incorrect information about the violations in case numbers 12CF13654, 13CF0050, 13CF5437, and 13CF5879. See Ali v. State , 215 So.3d 1250, 1251 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017).

Affirmed and Remanded to correct scrivener's errors in revocation orders.

Conner and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.


text:
    FIRST CHURCH OF the NAZARENE OF GAINESVILLE, FLORIDA, INC., and Florida District Church of the Nazarene, Inc., Appellants, v. SITE CONCEPTS, INC., Appellee.
    No. 4D18-2846
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [February 27, 2019]
    E. Blake Paul and Nicholas L. Sellars of Peterson & Myers, P.A., Lakeland, for appellants.
    Tim B. Wright of Wright, Ponsoldt & Lozeau Trial Attorneys, L.L.P., Stuart, for appellee.
   Per Curiam.

We reverse an order denying a motion to dismiss or transfer venue.

Appellants are two churches. One is located in Alachua County; the other is in Polk County. The lawsuit below involves a cell phone tower located on church property in Alachua County. Appellee, Site Concepts, Inc. ("SCI"), is located in Martin County. SCI entered into a management agreement with the Alachua church to provide various services regarding the cell phone tower.

SCI filed a four-count complaint in Martin County setting forth breach of contract and implied contract claims against the Alachua church and two tortious interference counts against the Polk church. One of the claims of breach was that the Alachua church failed to cooperate in renegotiating a lease with Verizon by rejecting Verizon's offer to extend the term of the lease. The churches moved to dismiss or transfer the case for improper venue. SCI argued that venue was proper in Martin County because it was entitled to liquidated damages payable in Martin County. The circuit court denied the motion.

A plaintiff may select the venue and that selection will not be disturbed as long as the selection is one of the alternatives in the venue statute. Florida Gamco, Inc. v. Fontaine , 68 So.3d 923, 928 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011). A defendant contesting a plaintiff's facially proper venue selection has the burden of proving the selection is improper and must establish where venue actually lies. Id. Once a defendant has challenged venue with an affidavit controverting a plaintiff's venue allegation, the burden shifts to the plaintiff to prove the venue selection is proper. Id.

When a complaint alleges a breach of contract for failing to pay money due and the contract does not specify where payment is to be made, the place of payment rule provides for venue in the county where the creditor resides. However, the place of payment rule does not apply when the damages sought in the breach of contract action are unliquidated. Damages are unliquidated if the complaint does not seek recovery of a specific sum and the damages must instead be determined through the presentation of evidence.

Patterson v. Teague Fin. Group, Inc. , 135 So.3d 573, 574 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) (internal citations omitted). It is well-settled that

[d]amages are liquidated when the proper amount to be awarded can be determined with exactness from the cause of action as pleaded, i.e., from a pleaded agreement between the parties, by an arithmetical calculation or by application of definite rules of law.... [D]amages are not liquidated if the ascertainment of their exact sum requires the taking of testimony to ascertain facts upon which to base a value judgment.

Bowman v. Kingsland Dev., Inc. , 432 So.2d 660, 662-63 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983) (internal citations omitted); see also Bodygear Activewear, Inc. v. Counter Intelligence Servs. , 946 So.2d 1148 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006).

The damages sought by the complaint are mostly unliquidated. We note that the written management agreement does not provide for payments to be made to SCI in Martin County; rather, it calls for SCI to collect monies, deduct a 10% fee, and to remit payment to the Alachua church. Under the complaint, the exact amount to which SCI is entitled, if any, cannot be determined from the pleadings, but requires the taking of evidence. The damages suffered from the church's refusal to cooperate in renewing the Verizon lease, and the value of any services provided by SCI under the implied contract claim, are not fixed amounts that leap out from the face of the complaint. Like most tort claims, the intentional interference claims do not involve liquidated amounts.

Because the damages are unliquidated, the place of payment rule does not apply, and venue was improper in Martin County. We reverse the order of the circuit court and remand with directions to transfer venue to Alachua County. See § 47.011, Fla. Stat. (2018) (stating that "[a]ctions shall be brought only in the county where the defendant resides, where the cause of action accrued, or where the property in litigation is located."); Morales Sand & Soil, L.L.C. v. Kendall Props. & Invs. , 923 So.2d 1229, 1232 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) ; Magic Wok Int'l, Inc. v. Li , 706 So.2d 372, 374 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998).

Gross, Levine and Forst, JJ., concur.