text:
    INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIREFIGHTERS LOCAL S-20, et al., Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    No. SC17-1434
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    November 8, 2018
    Tobe M. Lev and Richard Siwica of Egan, Lev & Siwica, P.A., Orlando, Florida, for Petitioner
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Amit Agarwal, Solicitor General, Tallahassee, Florida, for Respondent
    Mark A. Touby and Richard A. Sicking of Touby, Chait & Sicking, P.L., Coral Gables, Florida, for Amicus Curiae Florida Professional Firefighters, Inc., International Association of Firefighters, AFL-CIO
    Thomas W. Brooks of Meyer, Brooks, Demma & Blohm, P.A., Tallahassee, Florida; and G. "Hal" Johnson, Florida Police Benevolent Association, Tallahassee, Florida, for Amicus Curiae Florida Police Benevolent Association, Inc.
   PER CURIAM.

We have for review the decision of the First District Court of Appeal in International Association of Firefighters Local S-20 v. State , 221 So.3d 736 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017). After further consideration, we conclude that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction and dismiss this review proceeding.

It is so ordered.

CANADY, C.J., and POLSTON, LABARGA, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

LEWIS, J., dissents with an opinion, in which PARIENTE and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

I dissent from the majority's decision to discharge jurisdiction in this case. The right to bargain collectively is a fundamental right. See art. I, § 6, Fla. Const.; Hillsborough Cty. Governmental Emps. Ass'n v. Hillsborough Cty. Aviation Auth. (Hillsborough ), 522 So.2d 358, 362 (Fla. 1988). The government of Florida belongs to the people. See Traylor v. State , 596 So.2d 957, 963 (Fla. 1992) (explaining that "[e]ach right" in the Declaration of Rights is "a distinct freedom guaranteed to each Floridian against government intrusion" and "operates in favor of the individual, against [the] government"). The people of Florida have voted and voiced their desire with regard to how they want their government operated.

An amendment to the Constitution, duly adopted, is the last expression of the will and intent of the law-making power and prior provisions inconsistent therewith or repugnant to the amendment are modified or superseded to the extent of inconsistency or repugnancy.

State v. Div. of Bond Fin. of Dep't of Gen. Servs. , 278 So.2d 614, 617-18 (Fla. 1973) (citing Advisory Op. to Governor , 152 Fla. 686, 12 So.2d 876 (1943) ; Sylvester v. Tindall , 154 Fla. 663, 18 So.2d 892 (1944) ; Bd. of Pub. Instruction of Polk Cty. v. Bd. of Comm'rs of Polk Cty. , 58 Fla. 391, 50 So. 574 (1909) ; Jackson v. Consol. Gov't of City of Jacksonville , 225 So.2d 497 (Fla. 1969) ). Article I, section 6 of the Florida Constitution should be considered the last expression of the will of the people. See id. at 617 ("It is a fundamental rule of construction that, if possible, amendments to the Constitution should be construed so as to harmonize with other constitutional provisions, but if this cannot be done, the amendment being the last expression of the will of the people will prevail."). The Governor's constitutional veto authority is the earlier of the two conflicting provisions, having existed as early as the Florida Constitution of 1838. Art. III, § 16, Fla. Const. (1838). Article III, section 16 of the 1838 Constitution provided that any bill which the Governor objected to was to be returned to the house in which the bill originated, and that house would reconsider the bill. Id. By contrast, the Florida Constitution did not provide public employees the right to bargain collectively until the 1968 constitutional revision. Art. I, § 6, Fla. Const. (1968).

After the 1968 constitutional revision, the Legislature had an obligation to effectuate the fundamental right to collectively bargain. In Dade County Classroom Teachers' Ass'n v. Ryan , 225 So.2d 903, 906 (Fla. 1969), the Court held that it is essential that the Legislature "enact appropriate legislation setting out standards and guidelines and otherwise regulate the subject within the limits of said Section 6." This Court has also held that if the Legislature failed to implement the rights in question the "Court [would], in an appropriate case, have no choice but to fashion such guidelines by judicial decree in such manner as may seem to the Court best adapted to meet the requirements of the constitution." Dade Cty. Classroom Teachers Ass'n v. Legislature of Fla. , 269 So.2d 684, 688 (Fla. 1972).

There can be no doubt that when any party, including a Governor, is involved in a direct dispute and at the same time maintains the power to act as final arbiter of the dispute through the power of veto-the impasse resolution process is subverted. See In re Murchison , 349 U.S. 133, 136, 75 S.Ct. 623, 99 L.Ed. 942 (1955) ("A fair trial in a fair tribunal is a basic requirement of due process."). The old maxim remains true: "[N]o man is allowed to be a judge in his own cause; because his interest would certainly bias his judgment, and, not improbably, corrupt his integrity." Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co. , 556 U.S. 868, 876, 129 S.Ct. 2252, 173 L.Ed.2d 1208 (2009) (quoting The Federalist No. 10, at 59 (J. Madison) (J. Cooke ed. 1961) ). In this context, the use of veto authority, after the impasse has been resolved by the Legislature, allows the Governor to act as a judge in his own cause, thereby obstructing due process. See id. (recognizing that no individual should be allowed to judge his or her own case given the inherent risk of bias in doing so). With the Governor holding the power to veto the Legislature's decision resolving the impasse, the fundamental right of public employees to collectively bargain is rendered hollow. See Int'l Ass'n of Firefighters Local S-20 v. State (Local S-20 ), 221 So.3d 736, 740 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (Thomas, J., dissenting). In acting as the third-party decision maker, the Legislature's decision should be implemented in a process that does not include executive branch veto.

The Legislature has an obligation to the people of Florida to create a system that shields fundamental rights against due process violations. The Legislature cannot dodge the issue of a flawed system as merely "subject to politics." Fundamental rights must be balanced to exist and be protected within a constitutional framework. It is the responsibility of the Legislature to create a constitutional structure that would not leave any party that was a participant in the dispute as the final decider. This may not be an easy task; however, it is a necessary task nonetheless to protect fundamental rights as presently contemplated.

Within these narrow circumstances the Legislature may consider a number of alternatives including the implementation of a state compelling interest test in which the Governor would be required to demonstrate a compelling state interest to sustain a veto of a legislative resolution of an impasse. See Local S-20 , 221 So.3d at 740-41 (Thomas, J., dissenting) ("[O]nce the Legislature has ruled in the public employees' favor and against the Governor, it cannot be reconciled with Article I, section 6 of the Florida Constitution to allow the Governor to render the Legislature's decision a nullity through the veto authority."). In recognizing that public employees have the right to collectively bargain as a fundamental right, the Legislature may decide that this fundamental right should be subject to official abridgment only upon a showing of a compelling state interest. Hillsborough , 522 So.2d 358. Nevertheless, members of the Legislature cannot throw up their hands and simply say "oh well." Democracy can be dangerous and full of complexities; and, while the overall structure remains in concept, the moving parts move as directed by the people.

For the reasons set forth above, I dissent.

PARIENTE and QUINCE, JJ., concur.


source: Caselaw Access Project

author: PER CURIAM.

license: Public Domain

text:
    Inquiry Concerning a Judge No. 18-108 RE: Deborah WHITE-LABORA.
    No. SC18-950
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    November 15, 2018
    Honorable Krista Marx, Chair, Michael Louis Schneider, Executive Director and General Counsel, Alexander John Williams, Assistant General Counsel, Judicial Qualifications Commission, Tallahassee, Florida, for Florida Judicial Qualifications Commission, Petitioner
    Judge Deborah White-Labora, Judge, pro se, Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Miami, Florida, for Respondent
   PER CURIAM.

In this case, we review the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the Judicial Qualifications Commission (JQC) concerning Judge Deborah White-Labora, a judge of the Miami-Dade County Court, and the stipulation entered into between Judge White-Labora and the JQC. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 12, Fla. Const. As explained below, we approve the parties' stipulation to the allegation that Judge White-Labora improperly provided a character reference letter, on her official court stationery, on behalf of a criminal defendant awaiting sentencing in federal court, as well as the JQC's finding that this misconduct violated two canons of the Code of Judicial Conduct. We also approve the stipulated discipline of a public reprimand.

FACTS

In its Notice of Formal Charges, the JQC accused Judge White-Labora of engaging in improper conduct in violation of two canons of the Code of Judicial Conduct, in pertinent part as follows:

1. In January of 2018, you wrote a character reference letter on behalf of a criminal defendant awaiting sentencing in federal court.... This letter was written on your judicial letter head, and signed "Deborah White-Labora, County Court Judge." ...
2. Such character reference letters are prohibited by the Canons and have resulted in published disciplinary cases....
3. Your public support for this defendant was noted in an article published by the Miami-Herald.
Your actions constitute inappropriate conduct that violate Canons 1 and 2 of the Florida Code of Judicial Conduct.

Following an investigative hearing, Judge White-Labora entered into a factual stipulation with the JQC admitting the charges, apologizing for her improper conduct, and accepting the public reprimand as recommended by the JQC investigative panel. Based on the stipulation, the panel concluded that Judge White-Labora violated Canons 1 and 2 2 of the Code of Judicial Conduct.

Thereafter, the JQC panel made its findings and recommendations of discipline, in which it stated in pertinent part:

The Investigative Panel of the Commission has now entered into a Stipulation with Judge White-Labora in which Judge White-Labora admits that her conduct, in writing and sending a letter of reference to a sentencing judge, on behalf of a criminal defendant awaiting sentencing in federal court[,] was inappropriate. This conduct violated Canons 1 and 2 of the Code of Judicial Conduct, as set forth in the Stipulation and Notice of Formal Charges submitted herewith.
Judge White-Labora has admitted the foregoing, accepts full responsibility, and acknowledges that such conduct should not have occurred. She has cooperated fully with the JQC.
The Judicial Qualifications Commission has concluded that while the judge did not intend to violate the Canons, she did not take appropriate steps to inform herself about the propriety of sending such a letter. Additionally, the Commission is mindful of the fact that her action in writing the letter, while inappropriate, was not motivated by selfish interests or motives. The JQC also notes Judge White-Labora's lengthy and heretofore unblemished service as a judicial officer.
Finally, the Commission believes that it is useful to note how such misconduct has been treated in the past [namely through the sanction of a public reprimand]....
Accordingly, the Commission therefore finds and recommends that in the interests of justice, the public welfare and sound juridical administration will be well served by a public reprimand of Judge White-Labora.

JQC'S FINDINGS

This Court may "accept, reject, or modify in whole or in part" the findings and conclusions of the JQC. Art. V, § 12(c)(1), Fla. Const. "This Court reviews the findings of the JQC to determine whether the alleged violations are supported by clear and convincing evidence, and reviews the recommended discipline to determine whether it should be approved." In re Holder , 195 So.3d 1133, 1137 (Fla. 2016) (quoting In re Flood , 150 So.3d 1097, 1098 (Fla. 2014) ). "Although this Court gives the findings and recommendations of the JQC great weight, the ultimate power and responsibility in making a determination to discipline a judge rests with this Court." Id. (quoting In re Flood , 150 So.3d at 1098 ).

Judge White-Labora has admitted to the factual allegations regarding her actions and does not dispute the JQC's findings. We have held that "where a judge admits to wrongdoing and the JQC's findings are undisputed, this Court will ordinarily conclude that the JQC's findings are supported by clear and convincing evidence." Id. (quoting In re Flood , 150 So.3d at 1098 ). We do so in this case.

We further conclude that Judge White-Labora violated Canons 1 and 2 by writing and submitting a character reference letter, on her official court stationery, on behalf of a criminal defendant awaiting sentencing in federal court. By engaging in such conduct, Judge White-Labora failed to maintain the high standards of conduct necessary to preserve the integrity of the judiciary, violating Canon 1, and she acted in a manner that could potentially undermine public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary, violating Canon 2A. Further, in violation of Canon 2B, Judge White-Labora created the appearance of impropriety and partiality by improperly lending the prestige of her office to advance the private interests of the defendant for whom she improperly acted as a character witness.

RECOMMENDED DISCIPLINE

This Court is empowered to accept, modify, or reject the JQC's recommendations and "order that the ... judge be subjected to appropriate discipline." Art. V, § 12(c)(1), Fla. Const. In reaching an agreement with Judge White-Labora on the recommended sanction, the JQC Investigative Panel noted that Judge White-Labora fully cooperated with the JQC, admitted her misconduct, accepted full responsibility for it, and acknowledged that it should not have occurred. The JQC also recognized that, although Judge White-Labora did not take the appropriate steps to inform herself of the propriety of sending the letter, she did not send the letter to promote selfish interests, and she has a lengthy and otherwise previously unblemished history of judicial service.

Although we recognize that Judge White-Labora's conduct was well-intentioned, as Judge White-Labora understands by her agreement to the violations and discipline, her conduct is prohibited by the Code of Judicial Conduct. "[T]he object of disciplinary proceedings is not for the purpose of inflicting punishment, but rather to gauge a judge's fitness to serve as an impartial judicial officer." In re McMillan , 797 So.2d 560, 571 (Fla. 2001). Under our precedent, Judge White-Labora's conduct warrants a public reprimand. See In re Ward , 654 So.2d 549 (Fla. 1995) (public reprimand appropriate sanction for judge who provided character reference letter on official court stationery on behalf of defendant awaiting sentencing in federal court); In re Abel , 632 So.2d 600 (Fla. 1994) (same).

CONCLUSION

We conclude that there is clear and convincing evidence to support the findings of fact for the charges, and we approve the stipulation entered into by Judge White-Labora and the JQC. Accordingly, we hereby command Judge Deborah White-Labora to appear before this Court for the administration of a public reprimand at a time to be established by the Clerk of this Court.

It is so ordered.

CANADY, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, POLSTON, LABARGA, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

      Canon 1 states: "An independent and honorable judiciary is indispensable to justice in our society. A judge should participate in establishing, maintaining, and enforcing high standards of conduct, and shall personally observe those standards so that the integrity and independence of the judiciary may be preserved."


text:
    IN RE: STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES-REPORT 2018-04.
    No. SC18-1113
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    November 15, 2018
    Judge F. Rand Wallis, Chair, Supreme Court Committee on Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases, Daytona Beach, Florida; and Bart Schneider, Staff Liaison, Office of the State Courts Administrator, Tallahassee, Florida, for Petitioner
   PER CURIAM.

The Supreme Court Committee on Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases (Committee) has submitted proposed changes to the standard jury instructions and asks that the Court authorize the amended standard instructions for publication and use. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const.

The Committee proposes amending standard criminal jury instructions 11.7 (Unlawful Sexual Activity with Certain Minors), 11.10 (Lewd, Lascivious, Indecent Assault or Act Upon or in the Presence of Child; Sexual Battery), 11.10(a) (Lewd or Lascivious Battery (Engaging in Sexual Activity) ), 11.10(b) (Lewd or Lascivious Battery (Encouraging, Forcing or Enticing) ), 11.10(c) (Lewd or Lascivious Molestation), 11.10(d) (Lewd or Lascivious Conduct), 11.10(e) (Lewd or Lascivious Exhibition Presence of Child), 11.10(f) (Lewd or Lascivious Exhibition Over Computer Service), 11.10(g) (Lewd or Lascivious Exhibition by a Detainee in the Presence of an Employee of a Facility), 11.11 (Lewd or Lascivious Offenses Committed Upon or in the Presence of an Elderly Person or Disabled Person), 11.12 (Incest), 11.18 (Sexual Misconduct by a Psychotherapist), 11.21 (Transmission of Material Harmful to Minors by Electronic Device or Equipment), and 29.13(c) (Sexual Activity with an Animal). All of the proposals were published in The Florida Bar News. No comments were received by the Committee.

We authorize for publication and use instructions 11.7, 11.10(b), 11.10(c), 11.10(d), 11.10(e), 11.10(f), 11.10(g), 11.18, and 11.21 as proposed. Instruction 11.10(a) is authorized for publication and use as set forth in Appendix A to the Committee's report, rather than as described in the report. Instructions 11.10, 11.11, 11.12, and 29.13(c) are authorized for publication and use as modified. The more significant amendments to the instructions are discussed below.

First, the following changes are common with regard to many of the instructions.

Instructions 11.10, 11.10(a), 11.10(b), 11.10(c), and 11.10(d) as authorized reverse the order of the elements pertaining to the victim's and/or the defendant's ages and the defendant's conduct, so that the defendant's conduct is listed first in order.

The offense of Unnatural and Lascivious Act is added to the table of lesser-included offenses as a Category Two lesser offense to instructions 11.7, 11.10(f), 11.18, and 29.13, and a new comment based in part upon State v. Knighton , 235 So.3d 312 (Fla. 2018), modifies that lesser-included offense, as follows:

The courts do not require the State to allege the defendant's act was "unnatural" or "against the laws of nature" in order for § 800.02, Fla. Stat., to be given as a lesser-included offense. If the sexual activity involved penile-vaginal sexual intercourse (or contact), § 800.02, Fla. Stat. should not be given as a lesser-included offense. However, if the sexual activity involved something other than penile-vaginal sexual intercourse (or contact), § 800.02, Fla. Stat. should be given as a lesser-included offense. See State v. Knighton , 235 So.3d 312 (Fla. 2018).[ ]

Definitions for "bona fide" and "union" are added to the instructions as applicable, and the term "enhancement" is replaced by "reclassification" in instructions 11.7, 11.10(a), 11.10(b), 11.10(c), 11.10(d), 11.10(e), 11.11, and 11.21, because section 775.0862, Florida Statutes (2018), is a reclassification statute.

Lastly, in instructions 11.10(e), 11.10(g), and 11.11, the statutory definitions for "sadomasochistic abuse" and "sexual bestiality" are changed from those in sections 847.001(13) and 847.001(15), Florida Statutes (2018), respectively, to those in sections 827.071(e) and 827.071(g), Florida Statutes (2018), respectively, and the following new comment is added: "There are statutory definitions of 'sadomasochistic abuse' and 'sexual bestiality' in § 847.001, Fla. Stat., that differ from the statutory definitions in § 827.071, Fla. Stat. As of June 2018, there is no case law that decides which definition applies for a violation of [§ 800.04(7)(a), § 800.09, or § 825.1025, as applicable], Fla. Stat."

Turning to the individual instructions, the following additional changes are made.

We clarify that instruction 11.10 applies only to offenses committed prior to October 1, 1999.

In addition, we authorize instruction 11.10(a) as set out in the Committee's Appendix A to its report, leaving the offense of Unnatural and Lascivious Act as a Category Two lesser-included offense rather than moving it to the Category One box as discussed in the report.

In instruction 11.10(b), the statutory citations for "sadomasochistic abuse" and "sexual bestiality," sections 847.001(13) and 847.001(15), respectively, are removed, leaving the citations to sections 827.071(e) and 827.071(g), respectively. In addition, the comment added to instructions 11.10(e), 11.10(g), and 11.11 as set forth above, addressing section 847.001 statutory definitions, is also included in instruction 11.10(b).

The table of lesser-included offenses is updated in instruction 11.10(c) to reflect in the heading the primary offense of Lewd or Lascivious Molestation-Defendant 18 or Over; Victim Less Than 12, and that Lewd or Lascivious Molestation based upon the ages of the victim and/or the defendant are Category One lesser-included offenses, similar to the table of lesser-included offenses in instruction 11.1 (Sexual Battery-Victim Less Than 12 Years of Age).

Instruction 11.11, element three, pertaining to the defendant's knowledge, is modified to provide "at the time of the offense," which is consistent with instructions 11.10(a), 11.10(b), 11.10(c), 11.10(d), 11.10(e), and 11.10(f).

With regard to instruction 11.12, the table of lesser-included offenses is modified from the Committee's proposal to reflect that Unnatural and Lascivious Act is a Category Two lesser offense and includes the corresponding comment described above.

Definitions for "prurient interest" and "morbid interest" have been added to instruction 11.21, and are the same definitions for those terms already provided in instructions 24.1-24.6, the obscenity-related instructions.

Last, we decline the Committee's request that instruction 29.13(c) be authorized to include Unnatural and Lascivious Act as a Category One lesser-included offense, as that presents a matter of substantive law to be decided in a case or controversy, and to date it does not appear that that issue has expressly been addressed. See art. V, § 3(b), Fla. Const.; cf. In re Std. Jury Instr. in Crim. Cases-Report No. 2015-05 , 195 So. 3d 1088, 1089 (Fla. 2016) (stating that the issue of the constitutionality of a statutory provision that an instruction is based upon is beyond the scope of a jury instruction case).

Having considered the Committee's report, we authorize the amended instructions, as set forth in the appendix to this opinion, for publication and use. New language is indicated by underlining, and deleted language is indicated by struck-through type. We caution all interested parties that any comments associated with the instructions reflect only the opinion of the Committee and are not necessarily indicative of the views of this Court as to their correctness or applicability. In authorizing the publication and use of these instructions, we express no opinion on their correctness and remind all interested parties that this authorization forecloses neither requesting additional or alternative instructions nor contesting the legal correctness of the instructions. The instructions as set forth in the appendix shall become effective when this opinion becomes final.

It is so ordered.

CANADY, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, POLSTON, LABARGA, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

APPENDIX

11.7 UNLAWFUL SEXUAL ACTIVITY WITH CERTAIN MINORS

§ 794.05, Fla. Stat.

To prove the crime of Sexual Activity with a Minor, the State must prove the following three elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

Give 1a and/or 1b depending on the allegations and the evidence.

1. a. (Defendant) committed an act with (victim) in which the sexual organ of the [(defendant)] [(victim)] penetrated or had union with the [anus] [vagina] [mouth] of the [(victim)] [(defendant)].
b. (Defendant) committed an act with (victim) in which the [anus] [vagina] of [(victim)] [(defendant)] was penetrated by an object. The definition of an object includes a finger.
2. At the time, (defendant) was 24 years of age or older.
3. At the time, (victim) was 16 or 17 years of age.

Give if applicable.

Union means contact.

Give if applicable.

Lakey v. State, 113 So.3d 90 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013).

The definition of "an object" includes a finger.

Give if applicable.

§ 794.05(1), Fla. Stat.

Sexual activity does not include an act done for a bona fide medical purpose.

Give if requested. § 794.05(3), Fla. Stat.

(Victim's)lack of chastity is not a defense to the crime charged.

Give if requested. Feliciano v. State, 937 So.2d 818 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006); § 794.021, Fla. Stat.

The defendant's ignorance of (victim's)age, (victim's)misrepresentation of his or her age, or the defendant's bona fide belief of (victim's)age is not a defense to the crime charged.

Give if applicable.

"Bona fide" means genuine.

§ 775.0862, Fla. Stat.

EnhancementReclassification for sexual offense against student by school authority figure.

If you find that (defendant)committed the crime of Sexual Activity With a Minor, you must also determine whether the State has proved beyond a reasonable doubt that (defendant)was an authority figure at a school and (victim)was a student at the same school.

"Authority figure" means a person 18 years of age or older who is employed by, volunteering at, or under contract with a school.

"School" means an organization of students for instructional purposes on an elementary, middle or junior high school, secondary or high school, [or other public school level authorized under the rules of the State Board of Education]. The term "school" does not include facilities dedicated exclusively to the education of adults. If needed, insert appropriate definitions from § 775.0862(1)(b), Fla. Stat. for "private school" or "voluntary prekindergarten education program" or "early learning program" or "public school as described in s. 402.3025(1)" or "the Florida School for the Deaf and the Blind" or the "Florida Virtual School" or the "K-8 Virtual School."

"Student" means a person younger than 18 years of age who is enrolled at a school.

Lesser Included Offenses

UNLAWFUL SEXUAL ACTIVITY WITH CERTAIN MINORS - 794.05 CATEGORY ONE CATEGORY TWO FLA. STAT. INS. NO. None Unnatural and 800.02* 11.8* Lascivious Act* Attempt 777.04(1) 5.1

Comments

*The courts do not require the State to allege the defendant's act was "unnatural" or "against the laws of nature" in order for § 800.02, Fla. Stat., to be given as a lesser-included offense. If the sexual activity involved penile-vaginal sexual intercourse (or contact), § 800.02, Fla. Stat. should not be given as a lesser-included offense. However, if the sexual activity involved something other than penile-vaginal sexual intercourse (or contact), § 800.02, Fla. Stat. should be given as a lesser-included offense. See State v. Knighton, 235 So.3d 312 (Fla. 2018).

This instruction was adopted in 1998 [723 So.2d 123] and amended in 2015.

If removal of the disabilities of nonage is raised as an issue pursuant to § 794.05(2), Fla. Stat., the jury should be instructed with respect to § 743.01et seq.

This instruction was adopted in 1998 [723 So.2d 123] and amended in 2015 [163 So.3d 478], and 2018.

11.10 LEWD, LASCIVIOUS, INDECENT ASSAULT OR ACT UPON OR IN THE PRESENCE OF CHILD; SEXUAL BATTERY

§ 800.04, Fla. Stat.

Give only for those offenses committed before October 1, 1999.§ 800.04, Fla. Stat., was substantially amended in 1999. This instruction should be given only for those offenses committed before October 1, 1999.

To prove the crime of (crime charged), the State must prove the following two elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

1. (Victim) was under the age of 16 years.

Give as applicable.

2. 1. (Defendant)

a. [made an assault upon (victim) in a lewd, lascivious, or indecent manner].
[handled or fondled (victim) in a lewd, lascivious, or indecent manner].
b. (Defendant) committed upon (victim) or forced or enticed (victim) to commit
[actual or simulated sexual intercourse].
[deviate sexual intercourse].
[sexual bestiality].
[masturbation].
[sadomasochistic abuse].
[actual lewd exhibition of the genitals].
[any act or conduct which simulated that sexual battery was being or would be committed on (victim)].
c. (Defendant)
[committed an act [upon] [with] (victim) in which the sexual organ of the [(defendant)] [(victim)] penetrated or had union with the [anus] [vagina] [mouth] of [(victim)] [(defendant)]]. [committed an act upon (victim) in which the [anus] [vagina] of (victim) was penetrated by an object].
d. (Defendant) knowingly committed a lewd or lascivious act in the presence of (victim).
2. At the time, (victim) was under the age of 16 years.

Definitions.

Give in all cases.

Neither the victim's(victim's) lack of chastity nor the victim's(victim's) consent is a defense to the crime charged.

Give when pre-October 1, 1999 § 800.04(1), Fla. Stat., is charged.

As used in regard to this offense, the words "lewd," "lascivious," and "indecent" mean the same thing : . They mean a wicked, lustful, unchaste, licentious, or sensual intent on the part of the person doing an act.

Give when assault is charged under pre-October 1, 1999 § 800.04(1), Fla. Stat.

An "assault" is an intentional, unlawful threat by word or act to do violence to the person of another, coupled with an apparent ability to do so, and doing some act which creates a well-founded fear in such other person that such violence is imminent.

Give when pre-October 1, 1999 § 800.04(4), Fla. Stat., is charged.

As used in regard to this offense the words "lewd" and "lascivious" mean the same thing : and mean a wicked, lustful, unchaste, licentious, or sensual intent on the part of the person doing an act.

State v. Werner, 609 So.2d 585 (Fla. 1992).

"In the presence of" means that (victim)saw, heard, or otherwise sensed that the act was taking place.

Give if applicable.

"Union" means contact.

See State v. Werner, 609 So.2d 585 (Fla. 1992).

Give applicable definitions from § 847.001, Fla. Stat., when pre-October 1, 1999 § 800.04(2), Fla. Stat., is charged.

There is no need to make reference to the words "without committing the crime of sexual battery" because this refers to forcible sexual relations. Lanier v. State, 443 So.2d 178 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Chapters 84 86, Laws of Florida.

Lesser Included Offenses

LEWD, LASCIVIOUS, OR INDECENT ASSAULT OR ACT UPON OR IN PRESENCE OF CHILD - pre-October 1, 1999 800.04 CATEGORY ONE CATEGORY TWO FLA. STAT. INS. NO. None Attempt 777.04(1) 5.1 Assault 784.011 8.1 Battery 784.03 8.3 Unnatural and 800.02* 11.8* lascivious act*

Comment s

*The courts do not require the State to allege the defendant's act was "unnatural" or "against the laws of nature" in order for § 800.02, Fla. Stat., to be given as a lesser-included offense. If the sexual activity involved penile-vaginal sexual intercourse (or contact), § 800.02, Fla. Stat. should not be given as a lesser-included offense. However, if the sexual activity involved something other than penile-vaginal sexual intercourse (or contact), § 800.02, Fla. Stat. should be given as a lesser-included offense. See State v. Knighton, 235 So.3d 312 (Fla. 2018).

*Because the crime of Unnatural and Lascivious Act (§ 800.02, Fla. Stat.) requires the defendant's act be "with another person," it should not be given as a lesser-included offense if the only evidence is that the defendant committed a lewd or lascivious act in the presence of the victim (element #1d).

This instruction was adopted in 1981 and was amended in 1985 [477 So.2d 985], 1987 [508 So.2d 1221], 1992 [603 So.2d 1175], 1995 [657 So.2d 1152], 2008 [976 So.2d 1081],and 2010 [48 So.3d 41], and 2018.

11.10(a) LEWD OR LASCIVIOUS BATTERY (ENGAGING IN SEXUAL ACTIVITY)

§ 800.04(4)(a)1, Fla. Stat.

To prove the crime of Lewd or Lascivious Battery, the State must prove the following two elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

1. (Victim) was twelve years of age or older, but under the age of sixteen years.

Give 1a and/or 1b as applicable.

2.1. (Defendant)
a. [committed an act [upon] [with] (victim) in which the sexual organ of the [(defendant)] [(victim)] penetrated or had union with the [anus] [vagina] [mouth] of the [(victim)] [(defendant)].]
b. [committed an act [upon] [with] (victim) in which the [anus] [vagina] of [(victim)] [(defendant)] was penetrated by an object.] The definition of an object includes a finger.
2. At the time of the offense, (victim) was 12 years of age or older, but less than 16 years of age.

Definitions. Give if applicable.

Lakey v. State, 113 So.3d 90 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013).

"An object" includes a finger.

"Union" means contact.

Give if applicable.

§ 800.04(1)(a), Fla. Stat.

However, any act done for bona fide medical purposes is not a lewd or lascivious battery.

§ 800.04(2), Fla. Stat.

Neither (victim's)lack of chastity nor (victim's)consent is a defense to the crime charged.

§ 800.04(3), Fla. Stat.

The defendant's ignorance of (victim's)age, (victim's)misrepresentation of [his] [her] age, or the defendant's bona fide belief of (victim's)age is not a defense to the crime charged.

Give if applicable.

"Bona fide" means genuine.

§ 775.0862, Fla. Stat.

EnhancementReclassification for sexual offense against student by school authority figure.

If you find that (defendant)committed the crime of Lewd or Lascivious Battery, you must also determine whether the State has proved beyond a reasonable doubt that (defendant)was an authority figure at a school and (victim)was a student at the same school.

"Authority figure" means a person 18 years of age or older who is employed by, volunteering at, or under contract with a school.

"School" means an organization of students for instructional purposes on an elementary, middle or junior high school, secondary or high school, [or other public school level authorized under the rules of the State Board of Education]. The term "school" does not include facilities dedicated exclusively to the education of adults. If needed, insert appropriate definitions from § 775.0862(1)(b), Fla. Stat. for "private school" or "voluntary prekindergarten education program" or "early learning program" or "public school as described in s. 402.3025(1)" or "the Florida School for the Deaf and the Blind" or the "Florida Virtual School" or the "K-8 Virtual School."

"Student" means a person younger than 18 years of age who is enrolled at a school.

Lesser Included Offenses

LEWD OR LASCIVIOUS BATTERY (ENGAGING IN SEXUAL ACTIVITY) - 800.04(4)(a)1 CATEGORY ONE CATEGORY TWO FLA. STAT. INS. NO. None Aggravated battery 784.045(1) 8.4 Attempt 777.04(1) 5.1 Felony battery 784.041(1) 8.5 Aggravated assault 784.021(1)(a) 8.2 Battery 784.03 8.3 Assault 784.011 8.1 Battery 784.03 8.3 Unnatural and lascivious act* 800.02* 11.8*

Comments

*The courts do not require the State to allege the defendant's act was "unnatural" or "against the laws of nature" in order for § 800.02, Fla. Stat., to be given as a lesser-included offense. If the sexual activity involved penile-vaginal sexual intercourse (or contact), § 800.02, Fla. Stat. should not be given as a lesser-included offense. However, if the sexual activity involved something other than penile-vaginal sexual intercourse (or contact), § 800.02, Fla. Stat. should be given as a lesser-included offense. See State v. Knighton, 235 So.3d 312 (Fla. 2018).

In 2014, the legislature created a lewd and lascivious battery classified as a first degree felony if the defendant was 18 years of age or older at the time of the crime and had a prior conviction for an enumerated crime. See § 800.04(4)(c), Fla. Stat. If this enhancement is charged, it is likely thatApprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000) requires the jury to make at least one additional finding regarding the defendant's age.

This instruction was adopted in 2007 [969 So.2d 245] and amended in 2015 [163 So.3d 478], and 2018.

11.10(b) LEWD OR LASCIVIOUS BATTERY (ENCOURAGING, FORCING OR ENTICING)

§ 800.04(4)(a)2, Fla. Stat.

To prove the crime of Lewd or Lascivious Battery, the State must prove the following two elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

1. (Victim) was under the age of sixteen years.
2.1. (Defendant) [encouraged] [forced] [or] [enticed] (victim) to engage in [sadomasochistic abuse] [sexual bestiality] [prostitution] [or] [any act involving sexual activity].
2. At the time of the offense, (victim) was less than 16 years of age.

Definitions.

Give if applicable.

§ 800.04(1)(a), Fla. Stat.

"Sexual activity" means the oral, anal, or vaginal penetration by, or union with, the sexual organ of another or the anal or vaginal penetration of another by any other object; however, sexual activity does not include an act done for a bona fide medical purpose.

Lakey v. State, 113 So.3d 90 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013).

"An object" includes a finger.

Union means contact.

§ 827.071(de ) and § 847.001(13),Fla. Stat.

"Sadomasochistic abuse" means flagellation or torture by or upon a person, or the condition of being fettered, bound, or otherwise physically restrained, for the purpose of deriving sexual satisfaction from inflicting harm on another or receiving such harm oneself.

§ 827.071(fg ) and § 847.001(15),Fla. Stat.

"Sexual bestiality" means any sexual act between a person and an animal involving the sex organ of the one and the mouth, anus, or vagina of the other.

§ 796.07(1)(a), Fla. Stat.

"Prostitution" is the giving or receiving of the body for sexual activity for hire but excludes sexual activity between spouses.

§ 800.04(2), Fla. Stat.

Neither (victim's)lack of chastity nor (victim's)consent is a defense to the crime charged.

§ 800.04(1)(b), Fla. Stat.

"Consent" means intelligent, knowing, and voluntary consent, and does not include submission by coercion.

§ 800.04(1)(c), Fla. Stat.

"Coercion" means the use of exploitation, bribes, threats of force, or intimidation to gain cooperation or compliance.

§ 800.04(3), Fla. Stat.

The defendant's ignorance of (victim's)age, (victim's)misrepresentation of [his] [her] age, or the defendant's bona fide belief of (victim's)age is not a defense to the crime charged.

Give if applicable.

Bona fide means genuine.

§ 775.0862, Fla. Stat.

EnhancementReclassification for sexual offense against student by school authority figure.

If you find that (defendant)committed the crime of Lewd or Lascivious Battery, you must also determine whether the State has proved beyond a reasonable doubt that (defendant)was an authority figure at a school and (victim)was a student at the same school.

"Authority figure" means a person 18 years of age or older who is employed by, volunteering at, or under contract with a school.

"School" means an organization of students for instructional purposes on an elementary, middle or junior high school, secondary or high school, [or other public school level authorized under the rules of the State Board of Education]. The term "school" does not include facilities dedicated exclusively to the education of adults. If needed, insert appropriate definitions from § 775.0862(1)(b), Fla. Stat. for "private school" or "voluntary prekindergarten education program" or "early learning program" or "public school as described in s. 402.3025(1)" or "the Florida School for the Deaf and the Blind" or the "Florida Virtual School" or the "K-8 Virtual School."

"Student" means a person younger than 18 years of age who is enrolled at a school.

Lesser Included Offenses

LEWD OR LASCIVIOUS BATTERY (ENCOURAGING, FORCING OR ENTICING) - 800.04(4)(a)2 CATEGORY ONE CATEGORY TWO FLA. STAT. INS. NO. None Soliciting for 796.07(2)(f) 23.6 prostitution (only if prostitution is charged) Aggravated battery 784.045(1) 8.4 Attempt 777.04(1) 5.1 Felony battery 784.041(1) 8.5 Aggravated assault 784.021(1)(a) 8.2 Battery 784.03 8.3 Assault 784.011 8.1 Battery 784.03 8.3 Unnatural and lascivious 800.02* 11.8* act*

Comments *The courts do not require the State to allege the defendant's act was "unnatural" or "against the laws of nature" in order for § 800.02, Fla. Stat., to be given as a lesser-included offense. If the sexual activity involved penile-vaginal sexual intercourse (or contact), § 800.02, Fla. Stat. should not be given as a lesser-included offense. However, if the sexual activity involved something other than penile-vaginal sexual intercourse (or contact), § 800.02, Fla. Stat. should be given as a lesser-included offense. See State v. Knighton, 235 So.3d 312 (Fla. 2018).

In 2014, the legislature created a lewd and lascivious battery classified as a first degree felony if the defendant was 18 years of age or older at the time of the crime and had a prior conviction for an enumerated crime. See § 800.04(4)(c), Fla. Stat. If this enhancement is charged, it is likely thatApprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000) requires the jury to make at least one additional finding regarding the defendant's age.

There are statutory definitions of "sadomasochistic abuse" and "sexual bestiality" in § 847.001, Fla. Stat., that differ from the statutory definitions in § 827.071, Fla. Stat. As of June 2018, there is no case law that decides which definition applies for a violation of § 800.04(4)(a)2, Fla. Stat.

This instruction was adopted in 2007 [969 So.2d 245] and amended in 2015 [163 So.3d 478], and 2018.

11.10(c) LEWD OR LASCIVIOUS MOLESTATION

§ 800.04(5), Fla. Stat.

To prove the crime of Lewd or Lascivious Molestation, the State must prove the following three elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

Give 1a or 1b as applicable.

1. (Victim)
was 12 years of age or older but less than 16 years of age.
was less than 12 years of age.

Give 21 a and/ or 21 b as applicable.

2. 1. (Defendant), a. in a lewd or lascivious manner, intentionally touched the [breasts] [genitals] [genital area] [buttocks] [clothing covering the breasts] [clothing covering the genitals] [clothing covering the genital area] [clothing covering the buttocks] of (victim).
b. in a lewd or lascivious manner, intentionally [forced] [enticed] (victim) to touch the [breasts] [genitals] [genital area] [buttocks] [clothing covering the breasts] [clothing covering the genitals] [clothing covering the genital area] [clothing covering the buttocks] of (defendant).

Give 2a or 2b as applicable.

2. At the time of the offense, (victim)
a. was 12 years of age or older but less than 16 years of age.
b. was less than 12 years of age.

Give 3a or 3b as applicable.

3. At the time of the offense, (Ddefendant)
a. was 18 years of age or older at the time of the offense.
b. was less than 18 years of age at the time of the offense.

Definition.

The words "lewd" and "lascivious" mean the same thing: a wicked, lustful, unchaste, licentious, or sensual intent on the part of the person doing an act.

Give if applicable.

§ 800.04(2), Fla. Stat.

Neither (victim's)lack of chastity nor (victim's)consent is a defense to the crime charged.

§ 800.04(3), Fla. Stat.

The defendant's ignorance of (victim's)age, (victim's)misrepresentation of [his] [her] age, or the defendant's bona fide belief of (victim's)age is not a defense to the crime charged.

Give if applicable.

Bona fide means genuine.

Give if applicable. § 775.0862, Fla. Stat.

EnhancementReclassification for sexual offense against student by school authority figure.

If you find that (defendant)committed the crime of Lewd or Lascivious Molestation, you must also determine whether the State has proved beyond a reasonable doubt that (defendant)was an authority figure at a school and (victim)was a student at the same school.

"Authority figure" means a person 18 years of age or older who is employed by, volunteering at, or under contract with a school.

"School" means an organization of students for instructional purposes on an elementary, middle or junior high school, secondary or high school, [or other public school level authorized under the rules of the State Board of Education]. The term "school" does not include facilities dedicated exclusively to the education of adults. If needed, insert appropriate definitions from § 775.0862(1)(b), Fla. Stat. for "private school" or "voluntary prekindergarten education program" or "early learning program" or "public school as described in s. 402.3025(1)" or "the Florida School for the Deaf and the Blind" or the "Florida Virtual School" or the "K-8 Virtual School."

"Student" means a person younger than 18 years of age who is enrolled at a school.

Lesser Included Offenses

LEWD OR LASCIVIOUS MOLESTATION; DEFENDANT 18 OR OVER; VICTIM LESS THAN 12 - 800.04(5)(b) CATEGORY ONE CATEGORY TWO FLA. STAT. INS. NO. None Lewd or 800.04(5)(c)2 11.10(c) Lascivious Molestation; Defendant 18 or over; Victim 12 or over but less than 16 Lewd or Lascivious 800.04(5)(c)1 11.10(c) Molestation; Defendant less than 18; Victim less than 12 Lewd or Lascivious 800.04(5)(d) 11.10(c) Molestation; Defendant less than 18; Victim 12 or over but less than 16 Attempt 777.04(1) 5.1 Aggravated battery 784.045(1) 8.4 Felony battery 784.041(1) 8.5 Aggravated assault 784.021(1)(a) 8.2 Battery 784.03 8.3 Assault 784.011 8.1 Battery 784.03 8.3 Unnatural and lascivious 800.02* 11.8* act*

Comments

*The courts do not require the State to allege the defendant's act was "unnatural" or "against the laws of nature" in order for § 800.02, Fla. Stat., to be given as a lesser-included offense. If the sexual activity involved penile-vaginal sexual intercourse (or contact), § 800.02, Fla. Stat. should not be given as a lesser-included offense. However, if the sexual activity involved something other than penile-vaginal sexual intercourse (or contact), § 800.02, Fla. Stat. should be given as a lesser-included offense. See State v. Knighton, 235 So.3d 312 (Fla. 2018).

If the ages of either the defendant or the alleged victim are not in dispute, the parties may agree to pare down the necessary lesser-included offenses.

In 2014, the legislature created a lewd and lascivious molestation classified as a first degree felony depending on the ages of the defendant and victim and whether the defendant had a prior conviction for an enumerated crime. If this enhancement is charged,Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000) may require the jury to make additional findings regarding the prior qualifying conviction and/or the age of the victim involved. See § 800.04(5)(e), Fla. Stat.

This instruction was adopted in 2008 [998 So.2d 1138] and amended in 2013 [109 So.3d 721], and 2015 [163 So.3d 478] and 2018.

11.10(d) LEWD OR LASCIVIOUS CONDUCT

§ 800.04(6), Fla. Stat.

To prove the crime of Lewd or Lascivious Conduct, the State must prove the following three elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

1. (Victim) was under the age of 16 years.

Give 1a and/or 1b as applicable.

2.1. (Defendant)
a. [intentionally touched (victim) in a lewd or lascivious manner].
b. [solicited (victim) to commit a lewd or lascivious act].
2. At the time of the offense, (victim) was under the age of 16 years.

Give 3a or 3b as applicable.

3. a. At the time of the offense, (Ddefendant) was 18 years of age or older at the time of the offense.
b. At the time offense, (Ddefendant) was less than 18 years of age at the time of the offense.

Definitions.

The words "lewd" and "lascivious" mean the same thing : and mean a wicked, lustful, unchaste, licentious, or sensual intent on the part of the person doing an act.

Give if applicable.

§ 777.04(2), Fla. Stat.

To "solicit" means to ask earnestly or to try to induce the person solicited to do the thing solicited command, encourage, hire, or request another person to engage in specific conduct.

§ 800.04(2), Fla. Stat.

Neither (victim's)lack of chastity nor (victim's)consent is a defense to the crime charged.

§ 800.04(3), Fla. Stat.

The defendant's ignorance of (victim's)age, (victim's)misrepresentation of [his] [her] age, or the defendant's bona fide belief of (victim's)age is not a defense to the crime charged.

Give if applicable.

Bona fide means genuine.

§ 775.0862, Fla. Stat.

EnhancementReclassification for sexual offense against student by school authority figure.

If you find that (defendant)committed the crime of Lewd or Lascivious Conduct, you must also determine whether the State has proved beyond a reasonable doubt that (defendant)was an authority figure at a school and (victim)was a student at the same school.

"Authority figure" means a person 18 years of age or older who is employed by, volunteering at, or under contract with a school.

"School" means an organization of students for instructional purposes on an elementary, middle or junior high school, secondary or high school, [or other public school level authorized under the rules of the State Board of Education]. The term "school" does not include facilities dedicated exclusively to the education of adults. If needed, insert appropriate definitions from § 775.0862(1)(b), Fla. Stat. for "private school" or "voluntary prekindergarten education program" or "early learning program" or "public school as described in s. 402.3025(1)" or "the Florida School for the Deaf and the Blind" or the "Florida Virtual School" or the "K-8 Virtual School."

"Student" means a person younger than 18 years of age who is enrolled at a school.

Lesser Included Offenses

LEWD OR LASCIVIOUS CONDUCT, DEFENDANT 18 OR OLDER - 800.04(6)(b) CATEGORY ONE CATEGORY TWO FLA. STAT. INS. NO. NoneLewd or 800.04(6)(c) 11.10(d) lascivious conduct; defendant less than 18 Attempt 777.04(1) 5.1 Felony battery 784.041(1) 8.5 Aggravated assault 784.021(1)(a) 8.2 Battery 784.03 8.3 Assault 784.011 8.1 Battery 784.03 8.3 Unnatural and lascivious 800.02* 11.8* act (if element 1a is charged)*

Comment s

*The courts do not require the State to allege the defendant's act was "unnatural" or "against the laws of nature" in order for § 800.02, Fla. Stat., to be given as a lesser-included offense. If the sexual activity involved penile-vaginal sexual intercourse (or contact), § 800.02, Fla. Stat. should not be given as a lesser-included offense. However, if the sexual activity involved something other than penile-vaginal sexual intercourse (or contact), § 800.02, Fla. Stat. should be given as a lesser-included offense. See State v. Knighton, 235 So.3d 312 (Fla. 2018).

If the age of the defendant is not in dispute, the parties may agree to not give the necessary lesser-included offense.

This instruction was adopted in 2008 [998 So.2d 1138] and amended in 2015 [163 So.3d 478] and 2018.

11.10(e) LEWD OR LASCIVIOUS EXHIBITION PRESENCE OF CHILD

§ 800.04(7)(a), Fla. Stat.

To prove the crime of Lewd or Lascivious Exhibition, the State must prove the following four elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

1. (Victim) was under the age of 16 years.

Give 1a and/or 1b and/or 1c as applicable.

2.1. (Defendant)
a. [intentionally masturbated].
b. [intentionally exposed [his] [her] genitals in a lewd or lascivious manner].
c. [committed [a sexual act] [sadomasochistic abuse] [sexual bestiality] [simulation of any act involving sexual activity] that did not involve actual physical or sexual contact with (victim)].

3. 2. The act was committed in the presence of (victim).

3. At the time of the offense, (victim) was under the age of 16 years.

Give 4a or 4b as applicable.

4. a. At the time of the offense, (Ddefendant) was 18 years of age or older at the time of the offense.
b. At the time of the offense, (Ddefendant) was less than 18 years of age at the time of the offense.

Definitions.

Give if applicable.

The words "lewd" and "lascivious" mean the same thing : and mean a wicked, lustful, unchaste, licentious, or sensual intent on the part of the person doing an act.

§ 800.04(1)(a), Fla. Stat.

"Sexual activity" means the oral, anal, or vaginal penetration by, or union with, the sexual organ of another or the anal or vaginal penetration of another by any other object; however, sexual activity does not include an act done for a bona fide medical purpose.

Lakey v. State, 113 So.3d 90 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013).

"An object" includes a finger.

§ 847.001(13)827.071(e),Fla. Stat.

"Sadomasochistic abuse" means flagellation or torture by or upon a person or animal , or the condition of being fettered, bound, or otherwise physically restrained, for the purpose of deriving sexual satisfaction , or satisfaction brought about as a result of sadistic violence, from inflicting harm on another or receiving such harm oneself.

§ 847.001(15)827.071(g),Fla. Stat.

"Sexual bestiality" means any sexual act , actual or simulated, between a person and an animal involving the sex organ of the one and the mouth, anus, or vagina of the other.

§ 800.04, Fla. Stat. See State v. Werner, 609 So.2d 585 (Fla. 1992).

"In the presence of" means that ( victim) saw, heard, or otherwise sensed that the act was taking place.

§ 800.04(2), Fla. Stat.

Neither (victim's)lack of chastity nor (victim's)consent is a defense to the crime charged.

§ 800.04(3), Fla. Stat.

The defendant's ignorance of (victim's)age, (victim's)misrepresentation of his or her age, or the defendant's bona fide belief of (victim's)age is not a defense to the crime charged.

Give if applicable.

"Bona fide" means genuine.

§ 775.0862, Fla. Stat.

EnhancementReclassification for sexual offense against student by school authority figure.

If you find that (defendant)committed the crime of Lewd or Lascivious Exhibition in the Presence of a Child, you must also determine whether the State has proved beyond a reasonable doubt that (defendant)was an authority figure at a school and (victim)was a student at the same school.

"Authority figure" means a person 18 years of age or older who is employed by, volunteering at, or under contract with a school.

"School" means an organization of students for instructional purposes on an elementary, middle or junior high school, secondary or high school, [or other public school level authorized under the rules of the State Board of Education]. The term "school" does not include facilities dedicated exclusively to the education of adults. If needed, insert appropriate definitions from § 775.0862(1)(b), Fla. Stat. for "private school" or "voluntary prekindergarten education program" or "early learning program" or "public school as described in s. 402.3025(1)" or "the Florida School for the Deaf and the Blind" or the "Florida Virtual School" or the "K-8 Virtual School."

"Student" means a person younger than 18 years of age who is enrolled at a school.

Lesser Included Offenses

LEWD OR LASCIVIOUS EXHIBITION PRESENCE OF CHILD; DEFENDANT 18 OR OLDER- 800.04(7)(a) and (7)(b) CATEGORY ONE CATEGORY TWO FLA. STAT. INS. NO. NoneLewd or lascivious 800.04(7)(c) 11.10(e) exhibition presence of child; defendant less than 18 Attempt 777.04(1) 5.1 Exposure of Sexual 800.03 11.9 Organs Unnatural and lascivious 800.02* 11.8* act*

Comment s

*The courts do not require the State to allege the defendant's act was "unnatural" or "against the laws of nature" in order for § 800.02, Fla. Stat., to be given as a lesser-included offense.

If the age of the defendant is not in dispute, the parties may agree to not give the necessary lesser-included offense.

There are statutory definitions of "sadomasochistic abuse" and "sexual bestiality" in § 847.001, Fla. Stat., that differ from the statutory definitions in § 827.071, Fla. Stat. As of June 2018, there is no case law that decides which definition applies for a violation of § 800.04(7)(a), Fla. Stat.

This instruction was adopted in 2008 [998 So.2d 1138] and amended in 2015 [163 So.3d 478], and 2018.

11.10(f) LEWD OR LASCIVIOUS EXHIBITION OVER COMPUTER SERVICE

§ 847.0135(5), Fla. Stat.

To prove the crime of Lewd or Lascivious Exhibition over a Computer Online Service, the State must prove the following four elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

Give 1a, 1b, and/or 1c as applicable.

1. a. [(Defendant) intentionally masturbated].
b. [(Defendant) intentionally exposed [his] [her] genitals in a lewd or lascivious manner].
c. [(Defendant) committed [a sexual act] [sadomasochistic abuse] [sexual bestiality] [simulation of any act involving sexual activity] that did not involve actual physical or sexual contact with (victim)].
2. The act was committed live over a [computer on-line service] [internet service] [local bulletin board service].
3. At the time of the offense, (victim) was under the age of 16 years
or (Defendant) [knew] [should have known] [had reason to believe] that the transmission was viewed on a computer or television monitor by a victimperson in this state who was under the age of 16 years at the time of the offense.

Give 4a or 4b as applicable.

4. a. At the time of the offense, (Ddefendant) was 18 years of age or older at the time of the offense.
b. At the time of the offense, (Ddefendant) was less than 18 years of age at the time of the offense.

Definitions.

The words "lewd" and "lascivious" mean the same thing: a wicked, lustful, unchaste, licentious, or sensual intent on the part of the person doing an act.

§ 800.04(1)(a), Fla. Stat.

"Sexual activity" means the oral, anal, or vaginal penetration by, or union with, the sexual organ of another or the anal or vaginal penetration of another by any other object; however, sexual activity does not include an act done for a bona fide medical purpose.

Lakey v. State, 113 So.3d 90 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013).

The definition of "an object" includes a finger.

§ 847.001(13), Fla. Stat.

"Sadomasochistic abuse" means flagellation or torture by or upon a person or animal, or the condition of being fettered, bound, or otherwise physically restrained, for the purpose of deriving sexual satisfaction, or satisfaction brought about as a result of sadistic violence, from inflicting harm on another or receiving such harm oneself.

§ 847.001(15), Fla. Stat.

"Sexual bestiality" means any sexual act, actual or simulated, between a person and an animal involving the sex organ of the one and the mouth, anus, or vagina of the other.

§ 800.04(2), Fla. Stat.

Neither (victim's)lack of chastity nor (victim's)consent is a defense to the crime charged.

§ 800.04(3), Fla. Stat.

The defendant's ignorance of the (victim's)age, (victim's)misrepresentation of [his] [her] age, or the defendant's bona fide belief of (victim's)age is not a defense to the crime charged.

Give if applicable.

"Bona fide" means genuine.

The fact that an undercover operative or law enforcement officer was involved in the detection and investigation of an offense is not a defense to the crime charged.

Lesser Included Offenses

LEWD OR LASCIVIOUS EXHIBITION OVER COMPUTER SERVICE, DEFENDANT 18 YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER - 847.0135(5)(b) CATEGORY ONE CATEGORY TWO FLA. STAT. INS. NO. Lewd or Lascivious 847.0135(5)(c) 11.10(f) Exhibition over Computer Service, Defendant less than 18 years of age Unnatural and lascivious act* 800.02* 11.8* Attempt 777.04(1) 5.1

Comment s

*The courts do not require the State to allege the defendant's act was "unnatural" or "against the laws of nature" in order for § 800.02, Fla. Stat., to be given as a lesser-included offense.

If the age of the defendant is not in dispute, the parties may agree to not give the necessary lesser-included offense.

This instruction was adopted in 2008 [998 So.2d 1138] and amended in 2015 [176 So.3d 938], and 2018.

11.10(g) LEWD OR LASCIVIOUS EXHIBITION BY A DETAINEE IN THE PRESENCE OF AN EMPLOYEE OF A FACILITY

§ 800.09, Fla. Stat.

To prove the crime of Lewd or Lascivious Exhibition by a Detainee in the Presence of an Employee of a Facility, the State must prove the following three elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

1. (Defendant) was detained in a [state correctional institution] [private correctional facility].
2. While detained, (defendant) intentionally

Give as applicable.

a. masturbated.
b. exposed [his] [her] genitals in a lewd or lascivious manner.
c. committed [a sexual act] [sadomasochistic abuse] [sexual bestiality] [the simulation of any act involving sexual activity] that did not involve actual physical or sexual contact with a victim.
3. (Defendant's) act was intentionally committed in the presence of a person [he] [she] knew or reasonably should have known was an employee of the [institution] [facility].

Definitions. Give as applicable.

§ 944.02(8), Fla. Stat.

A "state correctional institution" is any prison, road camp, prison industry, prison forestry camp, or any prison camp or prison farm or other correctional facility, temporary or permanent, in which prisoners are housed, worked, or maintained, under the custody and jurisdiction of the Department of Corrections.

§ 944.710(3), Fla. Stat.

A "private correctional facility" is any facility, which is not operated by the Department of Corrections, for the incarceration of adults or juveniles who have been sentenced by a court and committed to the custody of the Department of Corrections.

§ 800.09(1)(a), Fla. Stat.

"Employee" means any person employed by or performing contractual services for a public or private entity operating a state correctional institution or a private correctional facility or any person employed by or performing contractual services for the corporation operating the prison industry enhancement programs [or the correctional work programs under part II of chapter 946]. [The term also includes any person who is a parole examiner with the Parole Commission.]

The words "lewd" and "lascivious" mean the same thing: a wicked, lustful, unchaste, licentious, or sensual intent on the part of the person doing an act.

§ 800.04(1)(a), Fla. Stat.

"Sexual activity" means the oral, anal, or vaginal penetration by, or union with, the sexual organ of another or the anal or vaginal penetration of another by any other object; however, sexual activity does not include an act done for a bona fide medical purpose.

Give if applicable.

"Bona fide" means genuine.

Lakey v. State, 113 So.3d 90 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013).

The definition of "an object" includes a finger.

§ 847.001(13), Fla. Stat.

"Sadomasochistic abuse" means flagellation or torture by or upon a person or animal, or the condition of being fettered, bound, or otherwise physically restrained, for the purpose of deriving sexual satisfaction, or satisfaction brought about as a result of sadistic violence, from inflicting harm on another or receiving such harm oneself.

§ 847.001(15), Fla. Stat.

"Sexual bestiality" means any sexual act, actual or simulated, between a person and an animal involving the sex organ of the one and the mouth, anus, or vagina of the other.

§ 800.04(1)(d), Fla. Stat.

"Victim" means a person upon whom the acts described above was committed or attempted or a person who has reported these acts to a law enforcement officer.

See State v. Werner, 609 So.2d 585 (Fla. 1992).

"In the presence of" means that a victim saw, heard, or otherwise sensed that the act was taking place.

§ 800.04(2), Fla. Stat.

Neither a victim's lack of chastity nor a victim's consent is a defense to the crime charged.

Lesser Included Offenses

LEWD OR LASCIVIOUS EXHIBITION BY A DETAINEE IN THE PRESENCE OF AN EMPLOYEE OF A FACILITY - 800.09 CATEGORY ONE CATEGORY TWO FLA. STAT. INS. NO. None Attempt 777.04(1) 5.1 Unnatural and lascivious act* 800.02* 11.8*

Comments

*The courts do not require the State to allege the defendant's act was "unnatural" or "against the laws of nature" in order for § 800.02, Fla. Stat., to be given as a lesser-included offense.

There are statutory definitions of "sadomasochistic abuse" and "sexual bestiality" in § 827.071, Fla. Stat., that differ from the statutory definitions in § 847.001, Fla. Stat. As of June 2018, there is no case law that decides which definition applies for a violation of § 800.09, Fla. Stat.

This instruction was adopted in 2013 [131 So.3d 720] and amended in 2015 [176 So.3d 938] and 2018.

11.11 LEWD OR LASCIVIOUS OFFENSES COMMITTED UPON OR IN THE PRESENCE OF AN ELDERLY PERSON OR DISABLED PERSON

§ 825.1025, Fla. Stat.

To prove the crime of [Lewd or Lascivious Battery] [Lewd or Lascivious Molestation] [Lewd or Lascivious Exhibition] upon or in the Presence of an [ Elderly Person ] or [ Disabled Person ] , the State must prove the following three elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

1. (Victim)was [an elderly] [a disabled] person.

Give 2a, 2b, or 2c 1a, 1b, or 1c as applicable.

2.1. a. (Defendant) committed lewd and lascivious battery by encouraging, forcing, or enticing (victim) to engage in [sadomasochistic abuse] [sexual bestiality] [prostitution] [any act involving sexual activity].
b. (Defendant) committed lewd and lascivious molestation of (victim) by intentionally touching, in a lewd and lascivious manner, [his] [her] [breasts] [genitals] [genital area] [buttocks] [clothing covering [his] [her] [breasts] [genitals] [genital area] [buttocks]].
c. (Defendant) committed lewd and lascivious exhibition to (victim) by intentionally[intentionally masturbating] [intentionally exposing [his] [her] genitals in a lascivious manner] [committing any other lewd or lascivious act not involving physical or sexual contact with (victim) including but not limited to [sadomasochistic abuse] [sexual bestiality] [simulated the simulation of any act involving sexual activity]].

2. At the time, (victim) was [an elderly] [a disabled] person.

The bracketed portion of element #3 pertains only to element 1c.
3. At the time of the offense, (Ddefendant) knew or reasonably should have known that the (victim) lacked the capacity to consent or failed to give consent [to have the act committed in [his] [her] presence].

Definitions. Give as applicable.

Give if jury is instructed on element #1b or element #1c.

The words "lewd" and "lascivious" mean the same thing ; and mean a wicked, lustful, unchaste, licentious, or sensual intent on the part of the person doing an act.

If 2a or 2c is alleged, define the act charged from § 825.1025(1), Fla. Stat.

§ 825.101(3), Fla. Stat.

"Disabled adult" means a person 18 years of age or older who suffers from a condition of physical or mental incapacitation due to a developmental disability, organic brain damage, or mental illness, or who has one or more physical or mental limitations that restrict the person's ability to perform the normal activities of daily living.

§ 825.101(4), Fla. Stat.

"Elderly person" means a person 60 years of age or older who is suffering from the infirmities of aging as manifested by advanced age or organic brain damage, or other physical, mental, or emotional dysfunctioning, to the extent that the ability of the person to provide adequately for the person's care or protection is impaired.

§ 825.101(7), Fla. Stat.

"Lacks capacity to consent" means an impairment by reason of mental illness, developmental disability, organic brain disorder, physical illness or disability, chronic use of drugs, chronic intoxication, short-term memory loss, or other cause, that causes an elderly person or disabled adult to lack sufficient understanding or capacity to make or communicate reasonable decisions concerning the elderly person's or disabled adult's person or property.

§ 847.001(13), Fla. Stat.

"Sadomasochistic abuse" means flagellation or torture by or upon a person or animal, or the condition of being fettered, bound, or otherwise physically restrained, for the purpose of deriving sexual satisfaction, or satisfaction brought about as a result of sadistic violence, from inflicting harm on another or receiving such harm oneself. "Sadism" means sexual gratification achieved through, or the association of sexual activity with, the infliction of physical pain, suffering, humiliation, torture, or death upon another person or an animal.

§ 847.001(15), Fla. Stat.

"Sexual bestiality" means any sexual act, actual or simulated, between a person and an animal involving the sex organ of the one and the mouth, anus, or vagina of the other.

§ 796.07(1)(a), Fla. Stat.

"Prostitution" is the giving or receiving of the body for sexual activity for hire but excludes sexual activity between spouses.

§ 825.1025(1), Fla. Stat.

"Sexual activity" means the oral, anal, or vaginal penetration by, or union with, the sexual organ of another or the anal or vaginal penetration of another by any other object; however, sexual activity does not include an act done for a bona fide medical purpose.

Give if applicable.

Bona fide means genuine.

Lakey v. State, 113 So.3d 90 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013).

An object includes a finger.
Union means contact.

Give if applicable. § 775.0862, Fla. Stat.

EnhancementReclassification for sexual offense against student by school authority figure.

If you find that (defendant)committed the crime of [Lewd or Lascivious Battery] [Lewd or Lascivious Molestation] [Lewd or Lascivious Exhibition] upon or in the Presence of an [Elderly] [Disabled] Person, you must also determine whether the State has proved beyond a reasonable doubt that (defendant)was an authority figure at a school and (victim)was a student at the same school.

"Authority figure" means a person 18 years of age or older who is employed by, volunteering at, or under contract with a school.

"School" means an organization of students for instructional purposes on an elementary, middle or junior high school, secondary or high school, [or other public school level authorized under the rules of the State Board of Education]. The term "school" does not include facilities dedicated exclusively to the education of adults. If needed, insert appropriate definitions from § 775.0862(1)(b), Fla. Stat. for "private school" or "voluntary prekindergarten education program" or "early learning program" or "public school as described in s. 402.3025(1)" or "the Florida School for the Deaf and the Blind" or the "Florida Virtual School" or the "K-8 Virtual School."

"Student" means a person younger than 18 years of age who is enrolled at a school.

Lesser Included Offenses

11.1411.11 LEWD OR LASCIVIOUS OFFENSES COMMITTED UPON OR IN THE PRESENCE OF AN ELDERLY PERSON OR DISABLED PERSON - 825.1025 CATEGORY ONE CATEGORY TWO FLA. STAT. INS. NO. None Attempt 777.04(1) 5.1 Assault 784.011 8.1 Battery 784.03 8.3 Exposure of sexual 800.03 11.9 organs Unnatural and 800.02* 11.8* lascivious act* Exposure of sexual 800.03 11.9 organs

Comments

*The courts do not require the State to allege the defendant's act was "unnatural" or "against the laws of nature" in order for § 800.02, Fla. Stat., to be given as a lesser-included offense. If the sexual activity involved penile-vaginal sexual intercourse (or contact), § 800.02, Fla. Stat. should not be given as a lesser-included offense. However, if the sexual activity involved something other than penile-vaginal sexual intercourse (or contact), § 800.02, Fla. Stat. should be given as a lesser-included offense. See State v. Knighton, 235 So.3d 312 (Fla. 2018).

§ 825.1025, Fla. Stat., protects a "disabled person" (age unspecific) while § 825.101, Fla. Stat., defines a "disabled adult" (18 years of age or older). The discrepancy between the two terms has yet to be clarified.

There are statutory definitions of "sadomasochistic abuse" and "sexual bestiality" in § 847.001, Fla. Stat., that differ from the statutory definitions in § 827.071, Fla. Stat. As of June 2018, there is no case law that decides which definition applies for a violation of § 825.1025, Fla. Stat.

This instruction was adopted in 2007 [965 So.2d 811] and amended in 2010 [48 So.3d 41], and2015 [163 So.3d 478], and 2018.

11.12 INCEST

§ 826.04, Fla._Stat.

To prove the crime of Incest, the State must prove the following three elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

1. (Victim) was the (relationship alleged) of (defendant).
2. (Defendant) [married] [had sexual intercourse with] (victim).
[married (victim)].
[had sexual intercourse with (victim)].
3. [At the time of the [marriage] [sexual intercourse], (defendant) knew (victim) was [his] [her] (relationship alleged)].
[At the time of the sexual intercourse, (defendant) knew (victim) was [his] [her] (relationship alleged)].

Definition .

"Sexual intercourse" is the penetration of the female sex organ by the male sex organ. Emission of seed is not necessary.

Lesser Included Offenses

INCEST - 826.04 CATEGORY ONE CATEGORY TWO FLA. STAT. INS. NO. None Attempt 777.04(1) 5.1 Unnatural and 800.02* 11.8* lascivious act*

Comment s

*The courts do not require the State to allege the defendant's act was "unnatural" or "against the laws of nature" in order for § 800.02, Fla. Stat., to be given as a lesser-included offense. If the sexual activity involved penile-vaginal sexual intercourse (or contact), § 800.02, Fla. Stat. should not be given as a lesser-included offense. However, if the sexual activity involved something other than penile-vaginal sexual intercourse (or contact), § 800.02, Fla. Stat. should be given as a lesser-included offense. See State v. Knighton, 235 So.3d 312 (Fla. 2018).

This instruction was adopted in 1981 and amended in 2018.

11.18 SEXUAL MISCONDUCT BY A PSYCHOTHERAPIST

§ 491.0112, Fla. Stat.

To prove the crime of Sexual Misconduct by a Psychotherapist, the State must prove the following three elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

1. (Defendant) committed sexual misconduct with (victim).
2. At the time, (defendant) was a psychotherapist.
Give 3a or 3b as applicable.
3. a. At the time, (victim) was a client of (defendant).
b. (Victim) was a former client of (defendant) and the professional relationship was terminated primarily for the purpose of engaging in sexual contact.

§ 491.0112(3), Fla. Stat.

It is not a defense that (victim)consented to any act that constitutes sexual misconduct.

Enhancement. Give if applicable. § 491.0112(2), Fla. Stat.

If you find the defendant guilty of Sexual Misconduct by a Psychotherapist, you must then determine whether the State has proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the crime was committed by means of therapeutic deception.

§ 491.0112(4)(b), Fla. Stat.

"Therapeutic deception" means a representation to the client that sexual contact by the psychotherapist is consistent with or part of the treatment of the client.

Definitions. § 491.0112(4), Fla. Stat.

§ 491.0112(4)(a), Fla. Stat.

"Psychotherapist" means any person licensed in Florida pursuant to Chapter 458 (medicine), Chapter 459 (osteopathic medicine), Part 1 I of Chapter 464 (nursing), Chapter 490 (psychology), or Chapter 491_(clinical counseling or psychotherapy services); or any other person who provides or purports to provide treatment, diagnosis, assessment, evaluation, or counseling of mental or emotional illness, symptom, or condition.

§ 491.0112(4)(d), Fla. Stat.

"Client" means a person to whom the services of a psychotherapist are provided.

§ 491.0112(4)(c), Fla. Stat.

"Sexual misconduct" means the oral, anal, or vaginal penetration of another by, or contact with, the sexual organ of another or the anal or vaginal penetration of another by any object.

Lesser Included Offenses

SEXUAL MISCONDUCT BY A PSYCHOTHERAPIST - 491.0112 CATEGORY ONE CATEGORY TWO FLA. STAT. INS. NO. None Unnatural and 800.02* 11.8* lascivious act* Attempt 777.04(1) 5.1

Comment s

*The courts do not require the State to allege the defendant's act was "unnatural" or "against the laws of nature" in order for § 800.02, Fla. Stat., to be given as a lesser-included offense. If the sexual activity involved penile-vaginal sexual intercourse (or contact), § 800.02, Fla. Stat. should not be given as a lesser-included offense. However, if the sexual activity involved something other than penile-vaginal sexual intercourse (or contact), § 800.02, Fla. Stat. should be given as a lesser-included offense. See State v. Knighton, 235 So.3d 312 (Fla. 2018).

This instruction was adopted in 2014 [146 So.3d 1110] and amended in 2018.

11.21 TRANSMISSION OF MATERIAL HARMFUL TO MINORS BY ELECTRONIC DEVICE OR EQUIPMENT

§ 847.0138(2), Fla. Stat.

To prove the crime of Transmission of Material Harmful to Minors by Electronic Device or Equipment, the State must prove the following three elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

1. (Defendant) knowingly sent an image, information or data that [he] [she] knew or believed to be harmful to minors.
2. (Defendant) sent the image, information or data to a specific individual who was either actually known by [him] [her] to be a minor or believed by [him] [her] to be a minor.
3. (Defendant) sent the image, information or data via electronic mail.

Definitions. Give as applicable.

§ 847.001(6), Fla. Stat.

An image, information, or data that is "harmful to minors" means any reproduction, imitation, characterization, description, exhibition, presentation, or representation, of whatever kind or form, depicting nudity, sexual conduct, or sexual excitement when it:

(a) Predominately appeals to a prurient, shameful, or morbid interest;
(b) Is patently offensive to prevailing standards in the adult community as a whole with respect to what is suitable material or conduct for minors; and
(c) Taken as a whole, is without serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value for minors.

A mother's breastfeeding of her baby is not under any circumstance "harmful to minors."

Prurient Interest.

A "prurient interest" in sex is a shameful or morbid interest in sex, nudity, or excretion. Material does not appeal to a prurient interest if the average person today can view the material candidly, openly, and with a normal interest in sex.

"Morbid interest" means diseased, dwelling on the gruesome, or sick.

§ 847.0137(1)(a)001(8),Fla. Stat.

"Minor" means any person less than 18 years of age.

§ 847.001(9), Fla. Stat.

"Nudity" means the showing of the human male or female genitals, pubic area, or buttocks with less than a fully opaque covering; or the showing of the female breast with less than a fully opaque covering of any portion thereof below the top of the nipple; or the depiction of covered male genitals in a discernibly turgid state. A mother's breastfeeding of her baby does not under any circumstance constitute "nudity," irrespective of whether or not the nipple is covered during or incidental to feeding.

§ 847.001(16), Fla. Stat.

"Sexual conduct" means actual or simulated sexual intercourse, deviate sexual intercourse, sexual bestiality, masturbation, or sadomasochistic abuse; actual lewd exhibition of the genitals; actual physical contact with a person's clothed or unclosed genitals, pubic area, buttocks, or, if such person is a female, breast with the intent to arouse or gratify the sexual desire of either party; or any act or conduct which constitutes sexual battery or simulates that sexual battery is being or will be committed. A mother's breastfeeding of her baby does not under any circumstance constitute "sexual conduct."

§ 847.001(19), Fla. Stat.

"Simulated" means the explicit depiction of conduct described in the definition of "sexual conduct" which creates the appearance of such conduct and which exhibits any uncovered portion of the breasts, genitals, or buttocks.

§ 847.001(5), Fla. Stat.

"Deviate sexual intercourse" means sexual conduct between persons not married to each other consisting of contact between the penis and the anus, the mouth and the penis, or the mouth and the vulva.

§ 847.001(15), Fla. Stat.

"Sexual bestiality" means any sexual act, actual or simulated, between a person and an animal involving the sex organ of the one and the mouth, anus, or vagina of the other.

§ 847.001(13), Fla. Stat.

"Sadomasochistic abuse" means flagellation or torture by or upon a person or animal, or the condition of being fettered, bound, or otherwise physically restrained, for the purpose of deriving sexual satisfaction, or satisfaction brought about as a result of sadistic violence, from inflicting harm on another or receiving such harm oneself.

§ 847.001(14), Fla. Stat.

"Sexual Battery" means oral, anal, or vaginal penetration by, or union with, the sexual organ of another or the anal or vaginal penetration of another by a finger or any other object; however, "sexual battery" does not include an act done for a bona fide medical purpose.

Give if applicable.

"Bona fide" means genuine.

Lakey v. State, 113 So.3d 90 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013).

"An object" includes a finger.

§ 847.001(17), Fla. Stat.

"Sexual excitement" means the condition of the human male or female genitals when in a state of sexual stimulation or arousal.

Give if applicable. § 775.0862, Fla. Stat.

EnhancementReclassification for sexual offense against student by school authority figure.

If you find that (defendant)committed the crime of Transmission of Material Harmful to Minors by Electronic Device or Equipment, you must also determine whether the State has proved beyond a reasonable doubt that (defendant)was an authority figure at a school and (victim)was a student at the same school.

"Authority figure" means a person 18 years of age or older who is employed by, volunteering at, or under contract with a school.

"School" means an organization of students for instructional purposes on an elementary, middle or junior high school, secondary or high school, [or other public school level authorized under the rules of the State Board of Education]. The term "school" does not include facilities dedicated exclusively to the education of adults. If needed, insert appropriate definitions from § 775.0862(1)(b), Fla. Stat. for "private school" or "voluntary prekindergarten education program" or "early learning program" or "public school as described in s. 402.3025(1)" or "the Florida School for the Deaf and the Blind" or the "Florida Virtual School" or the "K-8 Virtual School."

"Student" means a person younger than 18 years of age who is enrolled at a school.

Lesser Included Offenses

No lesser included offenses have been identified for this offense.

TRANSMISSION OF MATERIAL HARMFUL TO MINORS BY ELECTRONIC DEVICE OR EQUIPMENT - 847.0138(2) CATEGORY ONE CATEGORY TWO FLA. STAT. INS. NO. None Attempt 777.04(1) 5.1

Comment

This instruction was adopted in 2015 [163 So.3d 478] and amended in 2018.

29.13(c) SEXUAL ACTIVITY WITH AN ANIMAL § 828.126, Fla. Stat.

To prove the crime of Sexual Activity with an Animal, the State must prove the following element beyond a reasonable doubt:

Give as applicable.
(Defendant) knowingly
a. [engaged in sexual conduct or sexual contact with an animal].
b. [caused or aided or abetted another person to engage in sexual conduct or sexual contact with an animal].
c. [permitted sexual conduct or sexual contact with an animal to be conducted on any premises under [his] [her] charge or control].
d. [organized] [promoted] [conducted] [advertised] [aided] [abetted] [participated in as an observer] [performed any service in the furtherance of] an act involving sexual conduct or sexual contact with an animal for a commercial or recreational purpose].

Definitions.

§ 828.126(1)(a), Fla. Stat.

"Sexual conduct" means any touching or fondling by a person, either directly or through clothing, of the sex organs or anus of an animal or any transfer or transmission of semen by the person upon any part of the animal for the purpose of sexual gratification or arousal of the person.

§ 828.126(1)(b), Fla. Stat.

"Sexual contact" means any contact, however slight, between the mouth, sex organ, or anus of a person and the sex organ or anus of an animal, or any penetration, however slight, of any part of the body of the person into the sex organ or anus of an animal, or any penetration of the sex organ or anus of the person into the mouth of the animal, for the purpose of sexual gratification or sexual arousal of the person.

Lesser Included Offenses

SEXUAL ACTIVITY WITH AN ANIMAL - 828.126 CATEGORY ONE CATEGORY TWO FLA. STAT. INS. NO. None Attempt 777.04(1) 5.1

Comments

This crime does not apply to accepted animal husbandry practices, conformation judging practices, or accepted veterinary medical practices.See § 828.126(4), Fla. Stat.

This instruction was adopted in 2013 [131 So.3d 720] and amended in 2018.

      As proposed, the comment to instruction 11.10 was separated into individual paragraphs and the paragraph citing Knighton did not include the referencing asterisk. We have modified the comment so that it is consistent with the other instructions herein at issue.

      The amendments as reflected in the appendix are to the Criminal Jury Instructions as they appear on the Court's website at www.floridasupremecourt.org/jury_instructions/instructions.shtml. We recognize that there may be minor discrepancies between the instructions as they appear on the website and the published versions of the instructions. Any discrepancies as to instructions authorized for publication and use after October 25, 2007, should be resolved by reference to the published opinion of this Court authorizing the instruction.


text:
    C.F., Mother of M.F., M.F. and L.F., Minor Children, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-1919
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    November 14, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    King E. SHERMAN Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-2663
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    November 14, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Raymond FIGUEROA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-1983
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    October 16, 2018 Rehearing Denied November 26, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Raoul LORJUSTE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-3720
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    September 26, 2018 Rehearing Denied November 26, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Rodney Lee BEASLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-4062
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    November 15, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Jeffrey L. HAWKINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-3497
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    November 15, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Carl BLACKMON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-3452
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    November 15, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Sylvester KELLY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-3296
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    November 15, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Christopher COTTRELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-3694
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    November 15, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Zacquize HARACE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-4466
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    November 15, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Thomas L. BOWEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-4377
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    November 15, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Ryan Wayne PHILLIPS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-4104
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    November 15, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Charles SANMANN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-630
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    November 16, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Gregory SWENSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-0138
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    November 16, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Derek Jon KESTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-3540
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    November 15, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Demetri SINGLETON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-1290
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    November 15, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Jeffrey Marcus KENNELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-770
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    November 16, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Tavione A. WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-4952
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    November 16, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Siomarilys BAEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-4606
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    November 16, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Fred LEE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-4583
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    November 16, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Wayne T. COLDIRON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-2847
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    November 19, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Miguel A. TIRADO, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-1878
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    November 19, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Michael L. CRUMP, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-339
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    November 19, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Darryl Wayne RIDGEWAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-5067
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    November 19, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Tiffani HARRIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-4680
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    November 19, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Tiffani HARRIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-4679
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    November 19, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Paul HENDRIX, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-4128
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    November 19, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    David B. MILTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-3391
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    November 19, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Socorro D. ROJAS-CASTRO, Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Appellee.
    No. 1D18-3060
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    November 21, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   DISMISSED.


text:
    Heather Cauthen ZETROUER, Former Wife, Appellant, v. Dean ZETROUER, Former Husband, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-2475
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    November 21, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Latasha Denise MILLEDGE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    No. 1D18-2274
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    November 21, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   DENIED.


text:
    Irving BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-1861
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    November 19, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    David MORAN, Appellant, v. STATE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-3276
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    November 28, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    M.R., Mother of D.A.R.N., Jr., Z.A.P., A.E.T. and Z.R., Minor Children, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-2065
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    November 21, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Javaris Devaughn HERRING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-3420
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    November 21, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Ricky Leon WYNN, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-1274
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    November 21, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Teresita DE JESUS ABREU, Appellant, v. RIVERLAND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL and Broward County School Board, Appellees.
    No. 1D18-2246
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    November 28, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS/DIVISION OF RISK MANAGEMENT, Appellants, v. Timothy DUGIN, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-1932
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    November 28, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    C.B., Father of D.N.K., Appellant, v. A.K. and J.K., Appellees.
    No. 1D18-1667
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    November 28, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    James Anthony WHITFIELD, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-1344
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    November 28, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Manuel FUERTES, Appellant, v. MORE BAKERY, INC./AMTRUST NORTH AMERICA, Appellees.
    No. 1D18-1230
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    November 28, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Mark and Pamela GACEK, Appellants, v. AVALON DUNES CONDOMINIUM OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee.
    No. 1D18-0968
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    November 28, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    NEW LIFE MEDICAL INSTITUTION, Technology Insurance Company and AmTrust North America of Florida, Appellants, v. Itsa RIVAS, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-0747
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    November 28, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    FLORIDA INVESTORS CAPITAL, LLC, Appellant, v. UNITED SECURITY FINANCIAL CORP., Appellee.
    No. 1D18-545
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    November 28, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Shawn CLINGAN, Appellant, v. Rachel KICZALES, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-281
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    November 28, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Bridget HERNDON, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Michael Vincent Lowman, Appellant, v. ADVENT CHRISTIAN VILLAGE, INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-82
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    November 28, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Claude Lamite BULLARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-5250
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    November 28, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    KEENE SERVICES, INC. and R. Daniel Keene, Jr., Appellants, v. ANDERSON COLUMBIA COMPANY, INC., Appellee.
    No. 1D17-5153
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    November 28, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Devin N. JONES and Lisa A. Jones, Appellants, v. AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-5056
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    November 28, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Gregory Bennett ISMERT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-3864
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    November 28, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Robert Wayne VAUGHAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-2244
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    November 28, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    John VENN, Jr., AS TRUSTEE FOR the ESTATE OF Lisa BUCKLEY, Appellant, v. BAY DISTRICT SCHOOLS, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-1201
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    November 30, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    The CITY OF GULF BREEZE and Elizabeth A. Greer, Individually and as Trustee as Identified Under The Last Will and Testament of Mary J. Patterson a/k/a Mary Elizabeth Patterson, Appellants, v. John Lance REESE, Peter Peters and Mitzi Peters, as Trustees of the Peters Living Trust Dated September 9, 2010, Appellees.
    The City of Gulf Breeze, Appellant, v. John Lance Reese, Peter Peters, and Mitzi Peters, as Trustees of The Peters Living Trust Dated September 9, 2010, Appellees.
    Nos. 1D15-5127 1D16-3753 No. 1D17-4718
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    November 28, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Johnny Ray DRAWDY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D18-99
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 24, 2018.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Will H. QUARTERMAN DOC #140252, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-4406
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed September 12, 2018.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Christopher Allan SHAFFER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-4500
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed September 12, 2018.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.