source: Caselaw Access Project

author: PER CURIAM.

license: Public Domain

text:
    Richard E. LYNCH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. SC17-2235
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    September 20, 2018
    Maria DeLiberato, Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Lisa Marie Bort, Maria Christine Perinetti, and Raheela Ahmed, Assistant Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Middle Region, Temple Terrace, Florida, for Appellant
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, and Donna M. Perry, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, Florida, for Appellee
   PER CURIAM.

This case is before the Court on appeal from an order denying a motion to vacate two sentences of death under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851. Because the order concerns postconviction relief from two sentences of death, this Court has jurisdiction under article V, section 3(b)(1) of the Florida Constitution.

FACTS AND BACKGROUND

Richard E. Lynch pled guilty to two counts of first-degree premeditated murder, one count of armed burglary of a dwelling, and one count of kidnapping, all of which stemmed from events that occurred on March 5, 1999, and resulted in the deaths of Roseanna Morgan and her thirteen-year-old daughter, Leah Caday. Lynch v. State (Lynch I ), 841 So.2d 362, 365-66 (Fla. 2003). The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit most concisely detailed the facts surrounding the murders:

Lynch murdered Morgan and Caday on March 5, 1999, because he could not accept Morgan's decision to end their extramarital affair. See Lynch [I , 841 So.2d at 366]. The affair had lasted from August 1998 until February 1999. Id. While it was underway, although Lynch was unemployed and relied on his wife for financial support, he obtained three credit cards that were used to make more than $6,000 worth of purchases for Morgan. See Lynch v. State [ ( Lynch II ) ], 2 So.3d 47, 66 (Fla. 2008). She ended the affair on February 9, 1999 after her husband returned from Saudi Arabia where he had been working as a military contractor. See Lynch [I ], 841 So.2d at 374. While Morgan moved on, Lynch did not. He began stalking Morgan, hanging around her apartment complex, showing up at her job, following her on her way home from work, and calling her apartment. Morgan's husband confronted Lynch several times and told him to leave her alone, but it did no good. Lynch persisted.
On March 3, 1999, about three weeks after Morgan had ended the affair, Lynch wrote a letter to his wife declaring his intention to kill Morgan and then himself. See id. at 366, 368. In that letter he asked his wife to send Morgan's parents copies of the letters and cards Morgan had written to him, as well as nude pictures of Morgan that he had taken. Id. at 366. He wrote that "I want them to have a sense of why it happened, some decent closure, a reason and understanding. ... I want them to know what she did, the pain she caused, that it was not just a random act of violence." Lynch [II ], 2 So.3d at 64 (emphasis omitted). Lynch went on in the letter about the debts that had been run up on the credit cards, his fear that Morgan would not pay him back for any of the purchases, and the pain that she had caused him by ending their affair. After describing in explicit and unnecessary detail the various sexual acts he and Morgan had engaged in and how much he had enjoyed them, on the last page of the letter Lynch apologized to his wife "for all the pain, suffering, expense, embarrassment and hardship I will cause and give to you," but concluded that Morgan "must pay the price." Lynch left the letter in his garage.
Two days later, on March 5, he packed three pistols and ammunition into a black bag and drove to Morgan's apartment. See id. at 59. He parked his car down the street and around the corner from the apartment complex so that Morgan and her daughter Caday would not see it when they arrived at the complex. Id. ; Lynch [I ], 841 So.2d at 367 n.3. Lynch grabbed the bag with the three pistols and ammunition from the trunk of his car, walked to the complex, and picked an inconspicuous spot to wait for Morgan to return. See Lynch [II ], 2 So.3d at 76.
Caday got home first. See id. Lynch talked the thirteen-year-old into letting him inside by telling her that he wanted to speak with her mother. See id. at 62. Once inside the apartment, he pulled one of the pistols from the black bag and held Caday at gunpoint for thirty or forty minutes while waiting for Morgan to arrive. See Lynch [I ], 841 So.2d at 366. All the while, the young girl was "terrified." Id. She asked Lynch "why he was doing this to her." Id.
When Morgan finally returned home, Lynch met her at the door with a pistol in his hand. See Lynch [II ], 2 So.3d at 59. Sensing what Lynch was going to do, Morgan refused to come inside. They had a heated discussion, which ended when Lynch fired seven shots. See id. at 58, 70. Three of the shots hit Morgan in the legs. See id. at 53, 69-70. One hit her eye and tore through her neck. See id. at 69-70. She fell to the floor in the hallway outside her apartment, bleeding and screaming for help. See Lynch [I ], 841 So.2d at 366, 371. Lynch walked outside the apartment into the hallway where Morgan lay, and the door closed behind him. He dragged Morgan's bleeding body by her wrist back to the door, where he knocked and told Morgan's daughter to "Hurry up, open the door, your mom is hurt." Id. at 367. When Caday opened the door, Lynch dragged her mother inside, closing the door behind him. Id.
Inside the apartment, Lynch pulled a second pistol from his bag, and several minutes after he had first shot Morgan he killed her in front of her daughter by firing a single, execution-style shot to her head. See id. at 370-73 ; Lynch [II ], 2 So.3d at 69. He then called his wife at their home, Lynch [I ], 841 So.2d at 366, and told her he was "sorry for what I'm going to do." During that phone call, Lynch's wife could hear Caday screaming hysterically in the background. See id. at 369. After Lynch hung up, he killed the young girl by shooting her in the back. See id. at 366.
Lynch then called his wife again. Id. He told her that he had accidentally shot Caday and told her that he had left a letter in the garage. See id. When that call ended, Mrs. Lynch dialed 911. She told the operator about Lynch's phone calls and asked for the police to investigate. She then began to look for the letter. Her sister Juliette, whom Mrs. Lynch had paged after Lynch's first phone call, arrived at the home and joined in the search. Mrs. Lynch found the letter and started to read it but was interrupted when her husband called a third time. Both she and Juliette talked to him, begging him not to kill himself. See id. While Juliette was speaking with Lynch, Mrs. Lynch used her cell phone to call 911 again. She told the operator about the murder-suicide letter she had just found and that Lynch was willing to turn himself in. After that 911 call ended and Lynch had ended his call to Mrs. Lynch, she returned to reading the letter he had left. Before she could finish reading it, several police officers arrived at her home. See Lynch [II ], 2 So.3d at 68. One officer, after confirming that she was Mrs. Lynch, asked her for the letter. See id. She did not want to hand it over until she had finished reading it, but the officer kept asking and she gave him the letter.
While Mrs. Lynch was talking with the officers, Lynch himself called 911. See Lynch [I ], 841 So.2d at 370. He talked with the 911 operator for the next thirty or forty minutes. See Lynch [II ], 2 So.3d at 57-58. By the time that call began, two officers were at Morgan's apartment responding to the neighbors' reports of shots fired. The officers attempted to enter the apartment, but quickly retreated when Lynch fired a shot at them. See Lynch [I ], 841 So.2d at 366. Eventually, the SWAT team arrived, there were negotiations, and Lynch gave himself up. Before he did that, Lynch told the 911 operator that he had killed two people, that he had shot Morgan to "put her out of her misery," and that he had fired at the two police officers who tried to enter the apartment. Id.

Lynch v. Sec'y, Fla. Dep't of Corrs. (Lynch IV ), 776 F.3d 1209, 1212-14 (11th Cir. 2015). Lynch's trial counsel, in considering the abundance of evidence available against Lynch, recommended that he waive a penalty phase jury because a jury would be more emotional and unsympathetic to mitigation presented for the murder of a child than a seasoned trial judge would be. Id. at 1214. Accordingly, Lynch waived his right to a penalty phase jury. Id. at 1215.

The testimony elicited during the penalty phase regarding the events of March 5, 1999, included a tape of a telephone call that appellant made to the "911" emergency assistance service while still in the apartment where the murders occurred. On that tape, Lynch is heard admitting to the 911 operator that he shot two people at 534 Rosecliff Circle. He said he initially traveled to the apartment only to attempt to have Morgan pay a credit card debt, but resorted to shooting her in the leg and in the back of the head. He told the 911 operator that he had three handguns with him and that he shot Morgan in the back of the head to "put her out of her misery." Appellant also admitted to firing at the police when they first arrived on the scene.
As to Caday, appellant informed the 911 operator that he had held Caday at gunpoint while waiting for Morgan to return home. He related that she was terrified during the process prior to the shootings and asked him why he was doing this to her. Appellant admitted that he shot Caday, and said "the gun just went off into her back and she's slumped over. And she was still breathing for awhile and that's it." Appellant told the operator he planned to kill himself.
During the course of these events on March 5, 1999, appellant telephoned his wife three times from the apartment. His wife testified that during the first call she could hear a woman screaming in the background. Appellant's wife further testified that the screaming woman sounded "very, very upset." When Lynch called a second time, he admitted to having just shot someone.
Prior to being escorted from the apartment by police, Lynch also talked to a police negotiator. The negotiator testified that Lynch told her that during the thirty to forty minutes he held Caday hostage prior to the shootings, Caday was terrified, he displayed the handgun to her, she was aware of the weapon, and appeared to be frightened. He confided in the negotiator that Caday had complied with his requests only out of fear. Finally, appellant described the events leading to Morgan's death by admitting that he had confronted her at the door to the apartment, shot her in the leg, pulled her into the apartment, and then shot her again in the back of the head.
Several of Morgan's neighbors in the apartment complex also testified as to the events of March 5, 1999. Morgan's neighbor across the hall[n.2] testified that she looked out of the peephole in her door after hearing the initial shots and saw Lynch dragging Morgan by the hands into Morgan's apartment. She further testified that Lynch knocked on the door to Morgan's apartment and said, "Hurry up, open the door, your mom is hurt." The neighbor testified that Morgan was screaming and was bloody from her waist down. Morgan's neighbor further testified that the door was opened, then after entering with Morgan, Lynch closed the door and approximately five minutes later she heard the sound of three more gunshots. A second neighbor in the apartment complex also testified that approximately five to seven minutes after she heard the initial gunshots, she heard three more.
[n.2] The neighbor lived in the apartment directly across the hall from Morgan's apartment in the same apartment building.
After his arrest, appellant participated in an interview with police in which he confessed to the murders. He again admitted the events of the day, telling police he showed Caday the gun and that she was very scared while they were waiting for Morgan to arrive home. He told the detective that Caday was afraid and that he was "technically" holding her hostage. He admitted to shooting Caday's mother, Morgan, four or five times in the presence of her daughter.
In his post-arrest interview, Lynch also admitted that he planned to show Morgan the guns he brought with him to let her know he possessed them, and to force her to sit down and be quiet. He told the detectives he did not know why he did not just leave the guns in his car.[n.3] He admitted shooting Morgan four or five times, dragging her into the apartment, and then shooting her in the back of the head with a different firearm.
[n.3] The detective conducting the interview with appellant testified that Lynch's car was parked down the street, around the corner, and away from Morgan's apartment. It could not be seen from the apartment.
The State's final witness was the medical examiner who testified that after receiving the gunshot wound, it probably would have taken "no more than several minutes" for Caday to die. On cross-examination, although he conceded that it was possible that Caday could have died in less than one minute from the wound, such was unlikely. Finally, he also testified that with the amount of blood loss suffered by Caday, she could have lost consciousness within ten to twenty seconds.
The defense presented only one witness, a mental health expert. She related that she had diagnosed Lynch with schizoaffective disorder, a condition which is a combination of schizophrenia and a mood disorder. Further, she testified that she did not believe the letter appellant wrote two days prior to the murders demonstrated an intent by Lynch to kill Morgan. She concluded that appellant was under the influence of an extreme mental and emotional disturbance on March 5, 1999, and that his psychotic process substantially impaired his capacity to conform his conduct with the requirements of the law.
The State attempted to rebut the defense mental health evidence through the testimony of another mental health expert. The State's expert opined that Lynch suffered from a depressive disorder. The State's expert admitted that it was his opinion that on the day of the incident, appellant was suffering emotional distress, but it was not extreme, and Lynch did not lack the ability to conform his conduct to the requirements of the law. Finally, the State's doctor opined that the letter appellant wrote prior to the murders evidenced a murder-suicide plot.

Lynch I , 841 So.2d at 366-68. After considering all the evidence presented at the penalty phase, the trial court sentenced Lynch to death for the murders of Morgan and Caday. Lynch IV , 776 F.3d at 1215.

On direct appeal, we affirmed the judgments and sentences under review. Lynch I , 841 So.2d at 365. On October 6, 2003, the United States Supreme Court denied Lynch's petition for writ of certiorari. Lynch v. Florida , 540 U.S. 867, 124 S.Ct. 189, 157 L.Ed.2d 123 (2003). Thus, Lynch's sentence became final on that date.

We affirmed the denial of Lynch's initial motion for postconviction relief and denied his petition for writ of habeas corpus. Lynch II , 2 So.3d at 86. Additionally, Lynch sought federal relief pursuant to a writ of habeas corpus, which was granted in part and denied in part. Lynch v. Sec'y, Dep't of Corrs. (Lynch III ), 897 F.Supp.2d 1277, 1286 (M.D. Fla. 2012). On appeal and cross-appeal, the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the part of the district court's judgment denying Lynch habeas relief and reversed the part of the district court's judgment granting him relief. Lynch IV , 776 F.3d at 1232. On January 11, 2016, the Supreme Court denied Lynch's petition for writ of certiorari to the Eleventh Circuit. Lynch v. Jones , --- U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 798, 193 L.Ed.2d 723 (2016).

Lynch now files a successive motion for postconviction relief, challenging the constitutionality of his convictions and sentences under Hurst v. State , 202 So.3d 40 (Fla. 2016), which the postconviction court below denied. This appeal follows.

ANALYSIS

On his successive motion for postconviction relief, Lynch asserts that he is entitled to Hurst relief due to (1) his invalid waiver of his penalty phase jury, and (2) the alleged changed analysis of the prejudice prong under Strickland v. Washington , in light of Hurst . As explained at length below, we find both of these arguments to be meritless and thus affirm the postconviction court's denial of relief.

I.

Lynch first argues that he should be entitled to relief under Hurst because trial counsel's deficient advice with regard to the evidence available to defend his penalty phase case resulted in an invalid waiver of his right to a penalty phase jury. We conclude that this claim is meritless based on Lynch's valid waiver of his right to a penalty phase jury and on our precedent in Mullens v. State , 197 So.3d 16 (Fla. 2016), concerning such waivers.

When Lynch requested to waive his penalty phase jury, the trial court conducted an extensive colloquy with Lynch with regard to his understanding of the rights he sought to waive:

THE COURT: ... Now the second thing that you have done is you have asked me to consider waiving a jury trial for the penalty phase of this proceeding. Do you understand that?
MR. LYNCH: Yes.
THE COURT: Is that what you want to do?
MR. LYNCH: Yes, Your Honor.
THE COURT: I need to advise you that you have the right to have a jury of twelve persons hear matters of aggravation which are limited by statute, and any matters in mitigation that you wish to present. You have the right to be represented by a lawyer during the course of that hearing. You're entitled to testify at the hearing or to remain silent, and your silence cannot be used against you. You have the right to the subpoena power of the Court to compel the attendance of any witnesses that you may wish to call in your behalf at the hearing. If the jury by a vote of at least six to six recommends that you be given a life sentence, I will not override that decision and will impose a life sentence upon you. Do you understand that?
MR. LYNCH: Yes, Your Honor.
THE COURT: On the other hand, if the jury should return by a vote of at least seven to five and recommend that you be sentenced to death, I would have to give that recommendation, quote, great weight, end quote, although the final decision on the penalty to be imposed is my responsibility alone; do you understand that?
MR. LYNCH: Yes, Your Honor.
THE COURT: Is that what you want to do, you want to waive the right to have a jury trial as far as the recommendation of the penalty is concerned?
MR. LYNCH: Yes, sir.
THE COURT: You're sure about that?
MR. LYNCH: Yes, sir.
THE COURT: You understand that if I allow you to do that, I'm not going to let you change your mind later?
MR. LYNCH: Yes.
THE COURT: All right. Does the State wish to be heard on that issue.
[THE STATE]: I do, Your Honor.
We understand, of course, it's completely discretionary with the Court at this point as to whether or not you will impanel a jury for its recommendation or not. The State's position is that this particular strategy has been employed a number of times by the Public Defender's office in this circuit. The track record so far is in every case it has been a successful strategy to avoid the imposition of the death penalty.
This case will hopefully stand on its own merits and its own facts with the Court, and surely we recognize that, but I think on behalf of the State and in light of what has happened in the past cases, the State would ask that the Court impanel a jury. And we would state to the Court that the reason for our factual basis, which is six pages long, was to give the Court a bigger picture of what's involved in this case. This is a double homicide, it is a serious death penalty case. If anyone had any question about the prior ones, I would hope that none would be entertained about this case involving the death of a thirteen year old child.
So we would ask that the Court impanel a jury and allow a jury of Mr. Lynch's peers to make a recommendation to the Court for its consideration, and that would be our preference. Obviously, it's the Court's discretion.
THE COURT: All right. Well, I'm going to allow him to waive the jury, if that's what he wants to do, and it is. So I'll grant his motion.

In addition to the oral colloquy, Lynch also signed a written waiver, which detailed his understanding of his rights and his waiver of those rights:

E} I understand that under Florida Law I have a right to have a jury empaneled to consider matters relevant to my sentence and to have that jury recommend to the Judge, by an advisory verdict, Life Imprisonment Without Parole or the Death Penalty as to Counts 1 and Count [sic] 2 or either of them.
F} I further acknowledge I understand that, with the Court's consent, I may waive the Advisory Sentencing Jury and request that the Judge conduct the sentencing trial without a jury.
I specifically request a Sentencing Trial Without a Jury before the Judge alone and waive my right to an Advisory Jury Sentencing recommendation. See State vs. Hernandez, 645 So.2d 432 (Fla. 1994).
I understand by entering these pleas of guilty that I am submitting myself to the jurisdiction of the Court and that I will not be allowed to withdraw my pleas and the judge is required to sentence me to either Life in Prison Without Parole or the Death Penalty as authorized by law, for the offenses to which I have pled guilty.

Thus, as evidenced by both the oral and written waiver, Lynch was fully advised of his right to a penalty phase jury, and the postconviction court properly found that Lynch knowingly and voluntarily waived that right. See Tucker v. State , 559 So.2d 218, 220 (Fla. 1990) (holding that best practice is to obtain "both a personal on-the-record waiver and a written waiver").

Lynch, however, now attempts to obtain relief under this claim based upon the fact that trial counsel's insufficient mental health mitigation investigation ultimately caused him to make an unknowing and unintelligent waiver of his right to a penalty phase jury. We previously detailed the insufficient mental health mitigation at issue:

Lynch's trial counsel originally retained Dr. David Cox, a neuropsychologist. Dr. Cox concluded that Lynch suffered from cognitive disorder NOS (not otherwise specified) and a possible paranoid personality disorder. Dr. Cox recommended further neuropsychological testing to determine the degree of Lynch's impairment. Trial counsel were not pleased with the style of this expert's report, which they felt (1) was "amateurish" and (2) did not properly connect the diagnosis to the events of March 5, 1999. Trial counsel later dismissed Dr. Cox in favor of another neuropsychologist, Dr. Jacquelyn Olander. Trial counsel did not inform Dr. Olander that Dr. Cox had previously diagnosed some level of cognitive impairment. However, trial counsel did inform Dr. Olander that they had previously retained Dr. Cox. Dr. Olander respected Dr. Cox, and she assumed that if Lynch suffered from a cognitive impairment, it would have already been discovered and reported by the previous expert. Dr. Olander also assumed that trial counsel would have informed her if Lynch had received an impairment diagnosis. Based on these assumptions, Dr. Olander did not conduct neuropsychological testing with Lynch, but rather conducted only psychological testing. Dr. Olander diagnosed Lynch with schizoaffective disorder, which is a combination of schizophrenic symptoms and a mood disorder. She specifically testified at trial that Lynch did not have any brain impairment. Consequently, in sentencing Lynch, the trial court was unaware of the fact that Lynch suffered from some level of cognitive impairment.
During the postconviction hearing, [trial counsel] Mr. Figgatt and Mr. Caudill conceded that they were aware that Dr. Cox had diagnosed Lynch with a cognitive impairment. Further, they admitted that they did not follow up on this diagnosis, did not inform Dr. Olander, and did not obtain Lynch's school records or other background information to corroborate that Lynch suffered from some level of cognitive impairment. Lynch's school records might have been helpful in this regard because they reflect a disparity between his verbal and mathematic abilities (verbal exercises are predominately left-brain tasks, whereas math exercises are predominately right-brain tasks). Thus, Lynch's relatively good grades in English and religion, as compared to his low grades in mathematics courses and mechanical drawing, could have assisted his mental-health experts in diagnosing and attempting to corroborate a developmental cognitive impairment. Relatedly, Lynch's standardized test scores also reflect a disparity.

Lynch II , 2 So.3d at 74. It is this subsequent discovery of "mild " cognitive impairment, id. at 73, Lynch asserts, that now renders his waiver of his penalty phase jury unknowing and unintelligent.

Lynch's argument, however, has one fatal flaw. The evidence Lynch's lawyers did or did not present has no bearing on the knowing and intelligent nature of the waiver of his right to a penalty phase jury. Lynch was advised on the record of his right to a penalty phase jury and the consequences of waiving that right and further attested to his informed waiver in writing. Whether the mitigation investigated and presented, upon waiver of the penalty phase jury, was sufficient is something more appropriately presented under an ineffective assistance of counsel claim. See McMann v. Richardson , 397 U.S. 759, 774, 90 S.Ct. 1441, 25 L.Ed.2d 763 (1970) ("It is no denigration of the right to trial to hold that when the defendant waives his state court remedies and admits his guilt, he does so under the law then existing; further, he assumes the risk of ordinary error in either his or his attorney's assessment of the law and facts. Although he might have pleaded differently had later decided cases then been the law, he is bound by his plea and his conviction unless he can allege and prove serious derelictions on the part of counsel sufficient to show that his plea was not, after all, a knowing and intelligent act."). This Court, however, extensively analyzed whether Lynch's trial counsel were ineffective for failing to adequately investigate the mild cognitive impairment in his initial postconviction motion. Lynch II , 2 So.3d at 70-77. As discussed in more detail below, we held that, while counsel may have been deficient, Lynch had failed to prove that this deficiency prejudiced him-thus failing the Strickland test. Id. at 70-71, 77. Absent a showing that trial counsel was ineffective, Lynch cannot show his waiver of his penalty phase jury was unknowing or unintelligent. Therefore, the postconviction court properly held that Lynch's waiver was knowing and voluntary.

In Mullens , we held that when a defendant knowingly and voluntarily waives the right to a penalty phase jury, he is not later entitled to relief under Hurst v. Florida , --- U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016). Mullens , 197 So.3d at 39-40.

If a defendant remains free to waive his or her right to a jury trial, even if such a waiver under the previous law of a different jurisdiction automatically imposed judicial factfinding and sentencing, we fail to see how Mullens, who was entitled to present mitigating evidence to a jury as a matter of Florida law even after he pleaded guilty and validly waived that right, can claim error. As our sister courts have recognized, accepting such an argument would encourage capital defendants to abuse the judicial process by waiving the right to jury sentencing and claiming reversible error upon a judicial sentence of death. This we refuse to permit. Accordingly, Mullens cannot subvert the right to jury factfinding by waiving that right and then suggesting that a subsequent development in the law has fundamentally undermined his sentence.

Id. (citation omitted). Furthermore, since issuing our decision in Mullens , we have repeatedly reaffirmed the principle that a defendant who knowingly and voluntarily waives his right to a penalty phase jury cannot later claim relief under Hurst and its progeny. Hutchinson v. State , 243 So.3d 880, 883 (Fla. 2018) ; Rodgers v. State , 242 So.3d 276, 276-77 (Fla. 2018) ; Allred v. State , 230 So.3d 412, 413 (Fla. 2017) ; Deassure v. State , 230 So.3d 411, 412 (Fla. 2017) ; Twilegar v. State , 228 So.3d 550, 551 (Fla. 2017) ; Covington v. State , 228 So.3d 49, 69 (Fla. 2017) ; Wright v. State , 213 So.3d 881, 903 (Fla.), vacated on other grounds , --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 360, 199 L.Ed.2d 260 (2017) ; Knight v. State , 211 So.3d 1, 5 (Fla. 2016) ; Robertson v. State , No. SC16-1297, 2016 WL 7043020, at *1 (Fla. Dec. 1, 2016) ; Davis v. State , 207 So.3d 177, 212 (Fla. 2016) ; Brant v. State , 197 So.3d 1051, 1079 (Fla. 2016). Based on our clear and repeated precedent, Lynch is not entitled to Hurst relief in light of his valid waiver of a penalty phase jury. Therefore, we affirm the postconviction court's denial of relief on this claim of Lynch's successive motion for postconviction relief.

II.

Next, Lynch asserts that the test for the prejudice prong under Strickland has changed post- Hurst . Thus, Lynch requests that his prior claim of ineffective assistance of counsel be reevaluated with regard to the prejudice prong, in light of the allegedly modified post- Hurst Strickland test. Although the concur in result opinion takes the position that Lynch's Strickland argument should not be addressed, we disagree. The altered post- Hurst Strickland argument was a major component of Lynch's successive postconviction motion and we would be remiss to ignore it. The Strickland analysis, however, remains unchanged post- Hurst and, therefore, we conclude that this claim of Lynch's successive postconviction motion is without merit.

In Lynch II , we extensively addressed the issue of whether Lynch's counsel were ineffective for failing to fully investigate his mental health mitigation evidence before advising him to waive his penalty phase jury. 2 So.3d at 70-77. Specifically, we noted that, while counsel may have been deficient for failing to fully investigate Lynch's "mild " cognitive impairment, their deficiency did not prejudice Lynch because he "failed to present any evidence connecting any cognitive condition to his behavior" on the day of the murders. Id. at 77. Thus, even if counsel had presented evidence of Lynch's mild cognitive impairment, the significant aggravation in this case would have nonetheless outweighed the mitigation. Id. at 70-71. Because this Court previously extensively analyzed the issue of trial counsel's ineffectiveness, Lynch's present claim is procedurally barred. See Hendrix v. State , 136 So.3d 1122, 1125 (Fla. 2014) ("Claims raised and rejected in prior postconviction proceedings are procedurally barred from being relitigated in a successive motion." (citing Van Poyck v. State , 116 So.3d 347, 362 (Fla. 2013) ) ); see also Reed v. State , 116 So.3d 260, 268 (Fla. 2013) ; Grossman v. State , 29 So.3d 1034, 1042 (Fla. 2010). Lynch cannot now resurrect a previously extinguished claim under the guise of a new Strickland prejudice analysis in the post- Hurst legal landscape.

Nevertheless, Lynch's claim also fails on the merits. We have repeatedly held that trial counsel is not required to anticipate changes in the law in order to provide effective legal representation. See, e.g. , Lebron v. State , 135 So.3d 1040, 1054 (Fla. 2014) ("This Court has 'consistently held that trial counsel cannot be held ineffective for failing to anticipate changes in the law ....' " (quoting Cherry v. State , 781 So.2d 1040, 1053 (Fla. 2000) ) ). Furthermore, under Strickland , claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are assessed under the law in effect at the time of the trial . 466 U.S. at 690, 104 S.Ct. 2052. Therefore, Lynch is not entitled to a different prejudice analysis today, simply due to the release of Hurst and its progeny. As we previously explained, Lynch's trial counsel may have rendered deficient performance, but that deficiency did not ultimately prejudice Lynch. Thus, we affirm the denial of this claim of Lynch's successive postconviction motion.

CONCLUSION

Accordingly, we affirm the postconviction court's denial of Lynch's successive motion for postconviction relief.

It is so ordered.

CANADY, C.J., and LEWIS, POLSTON, LABARGA, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

PARIENTE, J., concurs in result with an opinion, in which QUINCE, J., concurs.

Pursuant to this Court's opinion in Mullens , I agree with the per curiam opinion's conclusion that Hurst does not apply to Lynch's case because he waived his right to a penalty phase jury. See per curiam op. at 322. However, because Hurst does not apply to Lynch's case, I would not address Lynch's second claim regarding the effect, if any, that Hurst has on the analysis of Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), claims. See per curiam op. at 322-23. Thus, I concur in result.

QUINCE, J., concurs.

      The State objected to Lynch's waiver of a penalty phase jury. The trial court conducted a colloquy of Lynch and ultimately accepted the waiver. Lynch also signed a written waiver.

      As we stated in Lynch II :
      In imposing death sentences for the murders, the trial court found three aggravating factors as to the murder of Morgan: (1) the murder was cold, calculated and premeditated (CCP) (great weight);
      (2) Lynch had previously been convicted of a prior violent felony (the murder of Caday) (moderate weight); and (3) the murder was committed while Lynch was engaged in one or more other felonies (little weight). See [Lynch I , 841 So.2d at 368.] As to the murder of Caday, the trial court also found three aggravating factors: (1) the murder was heinous, atrocious, or cruel (HAC) (great weight); (2) Lynch had previously been convicted of a prior violent felony (the murder of Morgan) (great weight); and (3) the murder was committed while Lynch was engaged in one or more other felonies (moderate weight). See id. With regard to mitigation, the trial judge found one statutory mitigator and eight nonstatutory mitigators:
      The statutory mitigating factor found was that Lynch had no significant history of prior criminal activity (moderate weight). The eight nonstatutory mitigators were: (1) the crime was committed while defendant was under the influence of a mental or emotional disturbance [but the disturbance was not extreme ] (moderate weight); (2) the defendant's capacity to conform his conduct to the requirements of law was impaired [but not severely impaired ] (moderate weight); (3) the defendant suffered from a mental illness at the time of the offense (little weight); (4) the defendant was emotionally and physically abused as a child (little weight); (5) the defendant had a history of alcohol abuse (little weight); (6) the defendant had adjusted well to incarceration (little weight); (7) the defendant cooperated with police (moderate weight); (8) the defendant's expression of remorse, the fact that he has been a good father to his children, and his intent to maintain his relationship with his children (little weight).
      Id. at 368 n.5.
      Lynch II , 2 So.3d at 53-54 (second and third alterations in original) (footnote omitted).

      Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).

      Mullens v. State , 197 So.3d 16 (Fla. 2016), cert. denied , --- U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 672, 196 L.Ed.2d 557 (2017).

      Hurst v. State (Hurst ), 202 So.3d 40 (Fla. 2016), cert. denied , --- U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 2161, 198 L.Ed.2d 246 (2017) ; see Hurst v. Florida , --- U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016).


text:
    Edward J. ZAKRZEWSKI, II, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. SC18-646
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    September 20, 2018
    Martin J. McClain of McClain & McDermott, P.A., Wilton Manors, Florida, for Appellant
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Charmaine M. Millsaps, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, for Appellee
   PER CURIAM.

We have for review Edward J. Zakrzewski's appeal of the circuit court's order denying Zakrzewski's motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851. This Court has jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const.

Zakrzewski's motion sought relief pursuant to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Hurst v. Florida , --- U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016), and our decision on remand in Hurst v. State (Hurst ), 202 So.3d 40 (Fla. 2016), cert. denied , --- U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 2161, 198 L.Ed.2d 246 (2017). Zakrzewski responded to this Court's order to show cause arguing why Hitchcock v. State , 226 So.3d 216 (Fla.), cert. denied , --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017), should not be dispositive in this case.

After reviewing Zakrzewski's response to the order to show cause, as well as the State's arguments in reply, we conclude that our prior denial of Zakrzewski's petition for a writ of habeas corpus raising similar claims is a procedural bar to the claims at issue in this appeal. All of Zakrzewski's claims depend upon the retroactive application of Hurst , to which we have held he is not entitled. See Zakrzewski v. Jones , 221 So.3d 1159, 1159 (Fla. 2017) ;

Hitchcock , 226 So.3d at 217. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Zakrzewski's motion.

The Court having carefully considered all arguments raised by Zakrzewski, we caution that any rehearing motion containing reargument will be stricken. It is so ordered.

CANADY, C.J., and LEWIS, QUINCE, POLSTON, LABARGA, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

PARIENTE, J., concurs in result with an opinion.

I agree with the per curiam opinion that we have formerly denied Zakrzewski relief pursuant to Hitchcock , which, of course, is now final. However, I write separately to emphasize the jury override in Zakrzewski's case.

Following the penalty phase, the jury in Zakrzewski's case recommended two sentences of death-both by a vote of seven to five-and one sentence of life by a vote of six to six. Nevertheless, the trial court sentenced Zakrzewski to three sentences of death, thereby overriding the jury's recommendation for life on the final sentence. See Asay v. State (Asay V ), 210 So. 3d 1, 29 n.19 (Fla. 2016), cert. denied , --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 41, 198 L.Ed.2d 769 (2017) (Labarga, C.J., concurring); id. at 35 n.32 (Pariente, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part).

As I expressed in Asay V , "the jurisprudence on the acceptability of judicial overrides has so dramatically changed" since sentences like Zakrzewski's were finalized. Id. at 35 n.32 (Pariente, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part). Hurst made clear that jury overrides are unconstitutional, and, likewise, jury overrides are not permitted under Florida's current capital sentencing scheme. See § 921.141, Fla. Stat. (2018).

      Hitchcock v. State , 226 So.3d 216 (Fla.), cert. denied , --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017).

      Hurst v. State (Hurst ), 202 So.3d 40 (Fla. 2016), cert. denied , --- U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 2161, 198 L.Ed.2d 246 (2017) ; see Hurst v. Florida , --- U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016).


text:
    James Levoy WATERS, Appellant, v. Pam CHILDERS, Clerk and Comptroller, Escambia County, Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-713
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    August 28, 2018 Rehearing Denied October 16, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Michael TRAMEL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-3282
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    August 15, 2018 Rehearing Denied October 16, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Michael ELMER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-0950
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    August 10, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Ernest M. FLOWERS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    No. 1D18-1137
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    June 20, 2018 Rehearing Denied September 6, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Timothy A. HAMPTON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    No. 1D18-2491
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    September 28, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   DISMISSED.


text:
    Joseph H. BROWNING and Deborah Browning, Appellants, v. BI-LO HOLDINGS, INC.; Bi-Lo Holdings, LLC ; et al., Appellees.
    No. 1D16-5676
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    September 25, 2018 Rehearing Denied October 17, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Augusta F. KENNEDY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-1474
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    September 6, 2018 Rehearing Denied October 16, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Randy Lamar WOULLARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-1072
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    September 6, 2018 Rehearing Denied October 17, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Maurice Eugene SANDERS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    No. 1D18-2238
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    September 28, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Eddie WILSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-1167
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    September 28, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Ervin J. FINDLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-1080
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    September 28, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Reginald CHATMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-0472
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    September 28, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Josef WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-1126
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    October 4, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Edmund A. HEID, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-2932
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    October 4, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    David King DIXON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-5197
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    September 28, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Joshua James SELPH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-4326
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    September 28, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Raymond P. LOWMAN, Appellant, v. Kenneth K. LOWMAN & Rodney L. Lowman, Appellees.
    No. 1D18-2332
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    October 5, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Shawn Detra SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-2437
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    October 4, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Eric Dewayne YOUNG, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D16-5742
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    October 4, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    David Antonio WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-3291
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    October 4, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    John Michael BOWERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-2036
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    October 5, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    L.I., Father of A.K.R., Minor Child, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-2061
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    October 5, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Billy Lee BOONE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-2303
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    October 5, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Ronnie CLAUSELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-2285
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    October 5, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Juan PARRA, Appellant, v. CEMEX CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS FLORIDA, LLC, and Gallagher Bassett Services, Appellees.
    No. 1D18-0883
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    October 16, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Roxanne PAYNE, Appellant, v. JUVENILE DETENTION CENTER FLORIDA and The Department of Insurance, Bureau of State Employees' WC Claims, Appellees.
    No. 1D18-0809
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Date of Accident: July 7, 1998 October 16, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Joel David HARDIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-4571
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    October 16, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Hector VALDES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-2396
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    October 16, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    KHOA VU, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-2635
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    October 16, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Carlos Lamar WARREN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-3078
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    October 16, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Paula KEYSER, Appellant, v. Curtis S. KEYSER, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-1874
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    October 16, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Simmie Lee KENDRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-1215
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    October 16, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Jason William ROSS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-368
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    October 16, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Ralph STOREY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-3094
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed June 15, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Adarius HOLLINGER, a/k/a Adarius Deshon Hollinger, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-4647
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed June 15, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Richard F. BRYANT, DC# 262261, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-5629
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed November 15, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Carlos Resharde ANDERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-2071
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed June 20, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Tommy Lee JOHNSON, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-4662
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed June 15, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Trevontae J. SHULER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-661
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed June 15, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    WHITBURN, LLC, and Barry Haught, individually, Appellants, v. EAGLE PALMS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., a Florida Non-Profit Corporation, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D18-444
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed June 15, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Karen URBANIK, Appellant, v. DEEP LAKE OPS, LLC, a Florida limited liability company; Blue Spoon, LLC, a Florida limited liability company; Brian W. Jones, individually; Michelle A. Jones, individually; and Michael Urbanik, Appellees.
    Case No. 2D17-1826
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed June 20, 2018.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Richard A. DYKE, DOC# 157999, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-2224
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed June 20, 2018.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Nancy Caroline FAZIO, Appellant, v. Teresa Fazio KROPP, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-4212
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed June 20, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    James J. TAGLIA, as Trustee FOR the R. VICTOR TAGLIA 2010 IRREVOCABLE TRUST, Derivatively on behalf of Nominal Defendant, Sun West Acquisition Corporation, Petitioner, v. John Gary GRUBBS and Sun West Acquisition Corporation, Nominal Defendant, Respondents.
    Case No. 2D17-4480
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed June 20, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Antwan D. JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-4573
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed June 20, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Sidney D. REYNOLDS, DOC # T40873, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-4632
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed June 20, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    PIONEER STATE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Tammy Jo LEE; Mark Lee; Brian Futterman, Christian Futterman; and Trudy Yuen, Appellees.
    Case No. 2D17-5153
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed June 20, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Melissa LUSBY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D18-388
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed June 20, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Rodney SHIELDS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D18-437
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed June 20, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Arnold S. ADAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D18-83
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed June 20, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Rico CIELO, DOC #579193, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D15-2975
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed June 20, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Reginald HANNAH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-1891
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed June 20, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Jodi A. SMITH, Appellant, v. LAKEWOOD RANCH GYMNASTICS, LLC, a Florida limited liability company; Laura Parraga; and David Parraga, Appellees.
    Case No. 2D17-3288
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed June 20, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    MOUNTAIN HIGH ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY, INC., Appellant, v. AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-3325
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed June 20, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Herbert JERRIDO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-3737
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed June 20, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Keldrice Deshine LEGREE, Sr., DOC #H19555, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-3932
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed June 20, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Nasario CRUZ-BETANCOURT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-4361
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed June 20, 2018.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    David M. HODIERNE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-4481
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed June 20, 2018.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Curtis J. SMITH, DOC# X23802, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-4625
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed June 20, 2018.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Todd Joseph MITCHKA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D18-242
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed June 20, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Arthur R. JIRAU, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D18-393
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed June 20, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Felix S. VANN, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D18-413
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed June 20, 2018.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Joshua J. DENNIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D18-487
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed June 20, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Miguel GUTIERREZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D18-64
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed June 20, 2018.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Jimmie CHAMPION, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-2992
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed June 22, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Sam KAZRAN a/k/a Sam Khazrwan, Appellant, v. Vernon G. BUCHANAN; 1099 Management Company, LLC, a Florida limited liability company; and John Tosch, Appellees.
    Case No. 2D15-80
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed June 22, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Zachary D. BITNER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-1399
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed June 22, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Erick SZRAJER and Marisa Szrajer, Appellants, v. FLORIDA INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION, INC., as statutory successor in interest to First Home Insurance Company Inc., Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-1967
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed June 22, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Michael TRICKETT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-2445
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed June 22, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Martin MEJIA-HERNANDEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-4820
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed June 22, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Gregory Roman DADY, Appellant, v. Maryana Pavlyshyn DADY, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-3001
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed June 22, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Usha PATEL, Appellant, v. HEARTWOOD 47, LLC (as successor to BankAtlantic), Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-4660
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed June 22, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Vincent B. SPELLS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-4594
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed June 22, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Christopher L. CLARK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-2304
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed June 22, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    John DOE, Appellant, v. SALESIANS OF DON BOSCO, d/b/a, Salesian Society, Inc., Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-1798
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed June 22, 2018.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Jason Wayne PEARSON, DOC#S06086, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-4144
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed June 22, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    CITY OF BONITA SPRINGS, Florida, a Florida municipal corporation, Appellant, v. WCI COMMUNITIES, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, as successor-in-interest for Pelican Landing Golf Resort Ventures Limited Partnership, a dissolved Delaware limited partnership, and WCI Communities, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Appellees.
    Case No. 2D17-4378
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed July 6, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Norris HUBBARD, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D14-5977
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed June 27, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Nicholas St. Claire THOMPSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-4063
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed June 22, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Francis GERRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-419
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed June 22, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Celese Shere GORDON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-4301
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 1, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Shane OTERO, DC#S04241, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-3958
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 1, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Marcario RINCON, DOC# 397953, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-4965
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 1, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Vincent MORRIS, DOC #267456, Appellant, v. HARDEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, and Travis Lamb, Warden, Appellees.
    Case No. 2D18-113
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed July 27, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Demone RUSHING, DOC #R16798, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-3443
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 3, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Grady Rodriguas BRYE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-4243
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 3, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Horace MACKEROY, Doc #H07546, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-4411
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 3, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Shawn HAMLETT, DC# C01227, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-4574
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 3, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Willie SAFFORD, DOC #243373, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-4794
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 3, 2018.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Akua Travon SAMUELS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-4878
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 3, 2018.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    William Aloysius LOWE, DOC #D90907, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D18-172
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 3, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Troy SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D18-206
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 3, 2018.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Jeremy D. POWERS, DOC# 548680, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D18-67
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 15, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Kenneth L. BALDWIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-4727
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 8, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    George MANN, DOC# 183053, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D18-174
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 8, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Nicole BREWINGTON, DOC #978438, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D18-151
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 3, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Harry C. WALTERS, DOC # S37472, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D18-163
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 29, 2018.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Danny A. HOGAN, Appellant, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, as trustee, in trust FOR The REGISTERED HOLDERS OF MORGAN STANLEY ABS CAPITAL I TRUST 2004-NC2, Mortgage Pass-through Certificates, Series 2004-NC2; The Little Mermaid Condominium Association Inc.; and Unknown Spouse of Danny A. Hogan, Appellees.
    Case No. 2D17-1743
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 24, 2018.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Ray Vincent THOMAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D18-2322
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 22, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Randy E. STODGEL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-4747
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed August 15, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Aaron SWANSON, Appellant, v. Linda J. ROBLES, as personal representative of the Estate of Miguel A. Mercado, deceased, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-4720
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed October 3, 2018.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Karla Lorraine WOOTEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D18-2058
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed September 26, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    COMPREHENSIVE CARE CORPORATION, Appellant, v. Dr. Jerry KATZMAN; Peggy Husted; Damian & Valori, LLP ; a Florida limited liability partnership; and Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo, P.C., Appellees.
    Case No. 2D17-1433
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed September 21, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Edward L. BASKIN, DOC #Y29801, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-4439
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed September 12, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Deborah E. FOCHT, Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Successor by Merger to Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, National Association, as Trustee, in Trust for the Holders of Structured Asset Securities Corporation - Amortizing Residential Collateral Trust Mortgage Pass Through Certificates, Series 2002-BC10 ; Darlene Balke; Unknown Spouse of Darlene Balke n/k/a William Balke; Sharon Marcolina; Unknown Spouse of Sharon Marcolina n/k/a Paul Marcolina; Susan Schlater; Tenant #1 n/k/a Paul Gianni ; and Tenant #2 n/k/a Christian Smith, Appellees.
    Case No. 2D16-5381
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed October 3, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    William Joseph JOHNSON, DOC# 165455, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-5639
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed October 3, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    1.0 LLC, a Nevada limited liability Company, Appellant, v. PEO DEPOT, INC., a Florida corporation; and Timothy Bourdeau, Appellees.
    Case No. 2D17-1244
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed October 3, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    BLACK POINT ASSETS, INC., AS TRUSTEE OF the 9227 CALLE ARRAGON AVE #104 LAND TRUST DATED MARCH 1, 2014. Appellant, v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR BEAR STEARNS ASSET BACKED SECURITIES I TRUST 2006-AC5, Asset Backed Certificates, Series 2006-AC5, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-1656
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed October 3, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Patricia M. BANKS, Appellant, v. Frank C. MAYER, Jr., Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-2575
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed October 3, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    G. Perry MASON, III, individually, Appellant, v. HARBOR COMMUNITY BANK, David Veley, individually, and John Shoop, individually, Appellees.
    Case No. 2D17-3263
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed October 3, 2018.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    HARBOR COMMUNITY BANK, Appellant, v. G. Perry MASON, III, individually, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-3419
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed October 3, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    David ROTHGEB a/k/a David G. Rothgeb, Individually and as Co-Trustee of the David Rothgeb and Belinda Rothgeb Living Trust, dated the 26th day of April, 2005; Belinda Rothgeb a/k/a Belinda J. Rothgeb a/k/a Belinda Begle, individually and as Co-Trustee of the David Rothgeb and Belinda Rothgeb Living Trust dated the 26th day of April, 2005, Appellants, v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC; United States of America, Department of Treasury, Appellees.
    Case No. 2D17-3472
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed October 3, 2018.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    In the INTEREST OF T.E.C., a child.
    S.I.C., Appellant, v. M.L.G., Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-3802
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed October 3, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Richard LEYTON, Appellant, v. Janette ROMERO f/k/a Janette Leyton, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-4892
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed October 3, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Ross SIMON and Lori Simon, Appellants, v. SECURITY FIRST INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-4166
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed October 3, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Jerome J. FINOCCHI, Appellant, v. Lindsay H. CALDWELL, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-4167
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed October 3, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    In the INTEREST OF MB, RB, and RB, children.
    D.B., Appellant, v. Department of Children and Families and Guardian ad litem Program, Appellees.
    Case No. 2D18-1965
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed October 3, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Matthew GARRY, Appellant, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D18-61
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed October 3, 2018.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Cory Mitchell WINKELMANN, Appellant, v. Kathy Ann MIRELES, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-1753
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed October 5, 2018.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    M.L., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-3173
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed October 5, 2018.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Mark JACKSON, Appellant, v. Michelle JACKSON, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-3439
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed October 5, 2018.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    William R. SCHAEFER, Appellant, v. Patricia A. SCHAEFER, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-5237
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed October 5, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    D.F., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-1774
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed October 5, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    B.L. G-H, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-2801
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed October 5, 2018.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Avelino MILLARES, Appellant, v. Donnie ROMINE, individually and as CEO of Bayfront Health Port Charlotte, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-2809
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed October 5, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Scott BEHNKE; Joanne Behnke; Wilderness Lake Preserve Homeowners Association, Inc.; Duane Thompson and Kathryn Thompson, Appellants, v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR CITIGROUP MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2007-WFHE3, Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-WFHE3, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-3036
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed October 5, 2018.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    J.M.D., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-3130
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed October 5, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    GROSVENOR INDUSTRIES, LLC, a Colorado Limited Liability Company, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. JET CONCEPTS, INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellee/Cross-Appellant.
    Case No. 2D17-407
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed October 5, 2018.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Marcus B. HARRIS, a/k/a Marzug Al-Hakim, Appellant, v. Martye S. GATTIE and Beverly C. Taviere, Appellees.
    Case No. 2D17-4142
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed October 5, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Ann W. COMBEE, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-4028
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed October 5, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Marlon Desha FARR, Sr., Appellant, v. Angela WALLACE, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-4890
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed October 5, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Diana BERGSTRESSER and Phillip Bergstresser, Appellants, v. Bradley D. MAGEE, Philip St. John, and Donald T. Smith, as personal representatives of the Estate of Carlton Edward Bergstresser, deceased, Appellees.
    Case No. 2D17-5071
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed October 5, 2018.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Daniel George JAKEWAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-543
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed October 5, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Clifford BURDICK, DOC #270899, Appellant, v. Danielle Carolaine LEAMING, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-615
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed October 5, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Joann MARSHALL, Appellant, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-2868
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed October 10, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Ryan L. BLACK, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-2245
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    October 09, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Writ of mandamus is denied.


text:
    Christian Michael Thomas THEODORE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-777
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed October 5, 2018.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Marianne ALBERGO, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-3215
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    October 04, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Pablo IBARRIA, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST CO., as Trustee, et al, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO. :2D18-2993
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    October 31, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Mary Kay SMITH, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. NAPLES ESTATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-3614
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    October 26, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Appeal is dismissed.


text:
    Gwendolyn ALOWOLODU, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. TAMPA WOODS APARTMENTS LTD. PARTNERSHIP, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-3485
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    October 10, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Kelvin FRAZIER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE OF the 20TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-3667
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    October 09, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Ronald H. BELL, et al, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. NAPLES ESTATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-3622
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    October 26, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Appeal is dismissed.


text:
    Debra Denise WREN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY FSB, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-0863
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    October 10, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Appeal is dismissed.


text:
    Timothy P. PIRTLE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-3909
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    October 04, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Beth DALTON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-2850 CASE NO.: 2D18-3310
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    August 20, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Scott L. SORENSON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. The BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON f/k/a the Bank of New York, as Trustee, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-3991
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    October 26, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Appeal is dismissed.


text:
    TOMATO THYME CORP., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Abraham RAMIREZ RIOS, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-4672
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    October 26, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Appeal is dismissed.


text:
    The NIELSEN COMPANY (US), LLC, et al., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Charles W. THOMAS, Tax Collector, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-1701
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    October 26, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Appeal is dismissed.


text:
    Fred Allen LUCIUS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-3880
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    October 05, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Romerio L. WALKER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-3480
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    October 29, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Shahid C. FLORENCE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-3193
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    October 4, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Granted. Vacated.

Denied.


text:
    Henry Lee SAILES, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-2558
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    September 28, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Mitchell Houston JAMES, Jr., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-3714
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    September 27, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Nathan'el MAXWELL, Sr., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. HMC ASSETS, Solely in Its Capacity as Separate Trustee, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-1920
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    October 31, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Grethel VARELA ESTEVEZ, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Juan Jeronimo RIVERO NAJERA, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-4277
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    October 31, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Robert BRAULT, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-3493
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    September 25, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Granted.


text:
    Racheal JENKINS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-3351
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    August 22, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Bruce DANDREW, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Samuel Blake FULLER, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-1874
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    October 31, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    J.R., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-3064
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    October 25, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Appeal is dismissed.


text:
    RENAISSANCE REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS FL, LLC., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-2420
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    September 20, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Javier Enrique ORDUNEZ, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-3380
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    September 13, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    SECURITY NATIONAL INSURANCE CO., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Frank JIRAU, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-4294
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    November 1, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    R.G., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-2090
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    November 01, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Tremaine Latroy BAILEM, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.:2D18-3361
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    September 27, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Terry T. RAWLS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-3391
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    September 26, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Joseph Carl GERRIE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-3164
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    October 10, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Appeal is dismissed.


text:
    Terry T. RAWLS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-3339
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    September 26, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Olvin SANCHEZ, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D16-0015
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    September 26, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Appeal is dismissed.


text:
    Victor L. PARKER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-3244
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    September 20, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    L.C., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-3058
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    October 25, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    James Lester WILLIAMS, Jr., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Jamai F. SAMUELS, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-3401
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    October 10, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Jamie M. COFFEY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-3128
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    September 18, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Mandamus is denied.


text:
    Cedric HOUSTON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-3025
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    September 13, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    H.D., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-2446
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    October 24, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Appeal is dismissed.


text:
    David BAKER, Jr., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Jean RAFAEZ, Christine Bennett and Latravia Baker, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-3418
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    October 09, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Andrew SPARK, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-2441
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    September 28, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Ronald BAKER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-3209
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    August 16, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Mandamus is dismissed.


text:
    Mackel D. WALKER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-3773
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    October 24, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Mandamus is transferred.


text:
    Doctor J.S. HAIL, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida and Department of Corrections, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-3425
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    September 26, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Kenneth HETTEL, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-2880
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    September 13, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Andre HAGER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-3395
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    September 11, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Granted.


text:
    David Gadi Michael COHEN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-3015
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    October 10, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    James PIERCE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-3197
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    October 10, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Kuriyakose M. PALLIPURATH, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-3325
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    October 10, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Roberts WINTER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Melissa Ann WINTER n/k/a Melissa Ann Pederson, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-3362
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    October 10, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Karen KLYMAN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-3815
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    October 24, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Joshua COLEMAN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-3405
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    September 26, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Appeal is dismissed.


text:
    Duane E. ARMSTRONG, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-0081
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    August 27, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Clenton MURPHY, Jr., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-3026
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    August 14, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Writ of habeas corpus is denied.


text:
    Garrett M. KERN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-4061
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    October 24, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Mandamus is transferred.


text:
    David MEDINA, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-2791
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    October 10, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Larry D. HARLEY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-3041
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    September 18, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Writ of mandamus is denied.


text:
    Nicholas James HARTMAN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-2828
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    August 14, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Belated appeal is dismissed.


text:
    Bartholomew PASCHAL, Rasheed D. Fields, Sean Fields, Willie Colbert and Patricia Mack, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. In re: ESTATE OF Michael James CALHOUN, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D18-3457
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    October 10, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    BAMBAMIAMI, INC., et al., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. SCHECHER GROUP, INC., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D18-0590
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    JULY 09, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Granted. Dismissed.


text:
    MIALO, LLC, et al., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. SCHECHER GROUP, INC., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D18-0591
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    JULY 09, 2018 Rehearing Denied August 21, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Frank JORDAN, et al., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. SCHECHER GROUP, INC., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D18-0592
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    JULY 09, 2018 Rehearing Denied August 21, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Granted. Dismissed.


text:
    Anthony NOTTAGE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 3D17-2512
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Opinion filed September 12, 2018.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Michael J. KNOWLES, Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Appellee.
    No. 3D17-2166
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Opinion filed September 12, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Jordy MOLINA, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. LPP MORTGAGE LTD., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D18-1000
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    AUGUST 21, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    FLORIDA BUILDING & SUPPLY, INC., et al., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. SCHECHER GROUP, INC., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D18-0593
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    JULY 09, 2018 Rehearing Denied August 21, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Jeffrey CORNETT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 3D16-2574
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Opinion filed September 12, 2018.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    U.S. BANK, N.A., as trustee FOR RESIDENTIAL ASSET SECURITIES CORPORATION, HOME EQUITY MORTGAGE ASSET-BACKED PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-EMX8, Appellant, v. Julio M. PONCE and Nelly Oropesa, Appellees.
    No. 3D15-2633
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Opinion filed September 12, 2018.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Alexander RODRIGUEZ, et al., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. GO GREEN ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D18-1288
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    AUGUST 20, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Gordon B. CHIU, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., etc., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D18-1302
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    AUGUST 13, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Grant.


text:
    Bernardo CASTANEDA, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D18-1522
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    SEPTEMBER 04, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Transferred.


text:
    ARKO PLUMBING CORP., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Michael P. RUDD, Esq., et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D18-1111
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    AUGUST 16, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Curtis FEIMSTER, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D18-1573
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    AUGUST 16, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    VINTAGE CLASSICS, LLC, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. SCHECHER GROUP, INC., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D18-1159
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    JULY 09, 2018 Rehearing Denied August 21, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Beatrice A. DE ARMAS, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Enrique M. JIMENEZ, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D18-1632
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    SEPTEMBER 04, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Lori A. REDER, etc., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D18-1688
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    SEPTEMBER 04, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Dominique SAUVETRE, et al., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. SCHECHER GROUP, INC., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D18-1160
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    JULY 09, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Ana Cristina Nordeste BRAATHEN, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. SCHECHER GROUP, INC., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D18-1161
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    JULY 09, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Granted. Dismissed.


text:
    Luis DELGADO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 3D18-1244
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Opinion filed September 12, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Rodolfo F. YORDI, etc., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Vivian CERNUDA, etc., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D18-1700
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    SEPTEMBER 04, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Yasmin V. SOLIS, etc., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Rosalyn RODRIGUEZ-KOPPEL, etc., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D18-1695
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    AUGUST 23, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Roman Luis MALAGON, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. SCHECHER GROUP, INC., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D18-1162
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    JULY 09, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Granted. Dismissed.


text:
    Jamalie ROBINSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 3D18-1201
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Opinion filed September 12, 2018.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Terrick Maurice CROSBY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 3D18-1138
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Opinion filed September 12, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    William PARLAMAN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 3D18-0627
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Opinion filed September 12, 2018.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Eric ELLINGTON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 3D17-2543
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Opinion filed September 12, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    JAMES SQUARED REALTY, LLC, etc., Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., etc., Appellee.
    No. 3D17-1042
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Opinion filed September 12, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Steven YOUNG, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D18-1572
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    AUGUST 16, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.