text:
    Glenda PAUL, Appellant, v. PUBLIX and Publix Risk Management, Appellees.
    No. 1D17-3874
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    July 2, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


source: Caselaw Access Project

license: Public Domain

text:
    Demetre Antoine MOORE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-0338
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    July 2, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Darien BUFORD, Appellant, v. Lowell COLLINS, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-4428
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    July 19, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Cecil Ray FISHER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-3131
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    July 19, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Angel GOITIA, Appellant, v. AMERICAN AIRLINES and Sedgwick CMS, Appellees.
    No. 1D18-0429
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    July 19, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Ada A. GONZALEZ, Appellant, v. Michael Joseph RUDISILL, Esq., Appellee.
    No. 1D18-186
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    July 19, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Daniel TAPPEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D16-5337
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    July 19, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Romeo WARD, Petitioner, v. Lori VANCAMP, Examiner, and Florida Commission on Offender Review, Respondents.
    No. 1D17-1122
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    May 11, 2018 Rehearing Denied July 2, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Craig B. DANIELS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-3805
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    May 11, 2018 Rehearing Denied July 2, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Mark BEECHAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D16-1922
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    April 19, 2018 Rehearing Denied July 2, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Sayton WALLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-0671
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    June 5, 2018 Rehearing Denied July 16, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Justin Todd Alexander EDRINGTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-0826
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    May 30, 2018 Rehearing Denied July 2, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Kenneth E. HAMMETT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-0360
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    May 23, 2018 Rehearing Denied July 6, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Robert Monroe SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D17-4624
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    May 17, 2018 Rehearing Denied July 2, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    George E. BAKER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-3756
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    December 15, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Granted.


text:
    Kyle R. SWILLEY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-4249
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    December 15, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Granted.


text:
    Milton THOMPSON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-3892
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    December 14, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Peter LYKIARDOPOULOS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. GREEN TREE SERVICING, LLC, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-4016
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    December 14, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Appeal is dismissed.


text:
    Daniel Alan STRINGFELLOW, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-3870
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    December 14, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Wilfrid SIMEON, Jr., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-4744
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    December 12, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Rodney WHITE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-4485
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    December 11, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Ulysses L. WILLIAMS, Sr., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-2288
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    November 08, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Brandon Michael KREIER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D15-4725
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed January 24, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Christopher ANDREWS, DOC# 116955, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case Nos. 2D15-5389
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed January 24, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Fernando CORREA, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. CHASE HOME FINANCE, LLC, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-4208
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    December 14, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Tony Deandre PRUITT, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-4475
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    December 11, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Writ of habeas corpus is denied.


text:
    David POWELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-1245
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed January 24, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Joshua Cordell BENFORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-153
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed January 24, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Mark Anthony TAYLOR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-2098
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed January 24, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Luis Juarez ALVARADO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-2409
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed January 24, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Gregory RAGINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-3357
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed January 24, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    David CARTAGENA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-4433
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed January 24, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Gleen E. ZAYAS-ACOSTA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-5116
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed January 24, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    John Eugene HAYES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-1190
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed January 24, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Bobby Ray TOWRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-2379
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed January 24, 2018.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Allie C. BESSETTE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-2465
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed January 24, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Mark COOK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-2471
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed January 24, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Karl BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-2493
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed January 24, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    George SHULER, DOC #079741, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-2526
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed January 24, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Joseph Michael STEVENS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-2837
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed January 24, 2018.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Fredrick MCKENNIE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-2850
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed January 24, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Agrait Alvarad CINTRON, DOC # C10857, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-3021
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed January 24, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Christopher Robert SCARANO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-606
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed January 24, 2018.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Kendarious T. ANDERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-5166
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed January 24, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Audrey Etta ELDER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-1085
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed January 24, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Justin Joel RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-1223
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed January 24, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Jibri T. ARRINGTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-1275
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed January 24, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Darius BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-1703
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed January 24, 2018.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Kristen Leigh FRASER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-2158
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed January 24, 2018.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Stephanie MULLINS, DOC #Q27273, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-2169
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed January 24, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Phillip L. AUSTIN, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-2219
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed January 24, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Dwight ROBERTS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-2326
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed January 24, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    San Pedro Nunez MARTINEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-2384
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed January 24, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Freddie Lee ROBINSON, DOC #761936, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-2413
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed January 24, 2018.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Zleyman SANCHEZ, DOC #D42603, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-2418
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed January 24, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Mason Andrew WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-2425
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed January 24, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Raymond A. FEGINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-2462
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed January 24, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Quinton L. HUBBARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-3100
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed January 24, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Ginger Annette NORMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-316
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed January 24, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Michael M. RUCKER, #56999-018, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-3558
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed January 24, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Brian WOODS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-3647
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed January 24, 2018.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Thor I. GENSINGER, Appellant, v. OFFICE OF the PUBLIC DEFENDER, SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-485
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed January 24, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Marcos Felix HERNANDEZ-GONZALEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-2023
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed January 26, 2018.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Lauri MILLER, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    Case No. 2D17-2620
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed January 26, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Sheree NAPIER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D15-1403
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed January 26, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    John Vincent LEBLANC, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-622
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed January 24, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Darryl ORTIZ-CABERERA, DOC# S39285, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-2197
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed January 26, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Javon Douryan MOSES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-2588
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed January 26, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    William Monroe GAINEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-3434
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed January 26, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Dixon STANFORD, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-4274
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed January 26, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Nicholas Salvatore MUSUMECI, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-1859
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed January 26, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Steven Craig PAYNE, DOC# 059170, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-2559
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed January 26, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Aaron Bruce CARPENTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-2686
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed January 26, 2018.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Daniel ISENHOWER, Sr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-2689
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed January 26, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Edward BRADLEY, #107790, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-2691
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed January 26, 2018.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    John E. MONTGOMERY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-74
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed January 26, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Christopher HILLFIGER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-4519
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed January 26, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Michel Jason JOLIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-5458
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed January 26, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Ilir PLLANA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-891
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed January 26, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Frank Paul DIAZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-1060
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed January 26, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Frank Paul DIAZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-1117
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed January 26, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Javier CRESPO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-241
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed January 26, 2018.
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Philip W. DUFFEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-2573
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed January 31, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Arseles D. MILLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-3430
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed January 31, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Matt SACKETT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D17-2706
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed January 26, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Charlotte DRAGONOV, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-1161
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    January 25, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    MORTON'S GOURMET, INC., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. L & S PARTNERS, LLC, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-1468
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    January 24, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Granted. Dismissed.


text:
    Angela PORTER, et al., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. SOVRAN ACQUISITION, L.P., Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-3028
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    January 24, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Appeal is dismissed.


text:
    TOTAL FACILITY, INC., et al., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Thomas PENNELLA, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D16-0920, 2D16-4404
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    January 24, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    John Steven DI VITO, P. A., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF HEALTH, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-4867
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    January 05, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Denzel NICKERSON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-4257
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    December 26, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Brody WHITAKER a/k/a Brody James Fink, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Brad KING, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-3569
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    December 26, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Sukumar MATHAN, M.D., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Patricia EMILCAR, Estate of: Jean Emilcar, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-4160
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    December 21, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Certiorari is dismissed.


text:
    Isaac Eugene ABRAMS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-4246
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    November 27, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Harvey DEMAREST, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-3865
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    January 25, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Robert PANKAU & Helen Pankau, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC., Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-0333
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    January 18, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Steven BEEBE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Michelle Kimberly HODGES-WRAY, et al. Appellee/Respondent(s).
    CASE NO.: 2D17-2112
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    November 15, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied. Appeal is dismissed. Denied.


text:
    MILLENNIUM DIAGNOSTIC & IMAGING CENTER, INC., etc., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. MERCURY INSURANCE COMPANY OF FLORIDA, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D16-2490
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    NOVEMBER 03, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.

Denied.


text:
    CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Roman Silva ZUNIGA, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-1954
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    JANUARY 04, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Juan Carlos BILLOCH, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Maria Cristina HOYO-LINCOLN, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-2091
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    JANUARY 03, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Yves BELIZAIRE and Yonie Belizaire, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. UBUNTU, LLC, etc., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D16-2925
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    DECEMBER 21, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    E.C., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-1333
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    NOVEMBER 02, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Elio ALMENARES, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Josefa Mari GALANO, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-2582
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    JANUARY 12, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Lorenzo Sousa DE BARBIERI, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Pilar L. BOSCH, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-2329
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    JANUARY 09, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Mark M. HESSEIN, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. REEF CLUB CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-2381
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    JANUARY 4, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Tremont SMITH, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. SP LINCOLN FIELDS, LP, etc., et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-2467
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    JANUARY 4, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    INDIAN CREEK VILLAGE, etc., Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. INDIAN CREEK COUNTRY CLUB, INC., etc., Appellee/Cross-Appellant,
    CASE NO.: 3D14-2235
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    JANUARY 11, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Granted. Dismissed.


text:
    James CASIMIR, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D18-0014
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    JANUARY 10, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Transferred.


text:
    Benito CONCEPCION, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D18-0050
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    JANUARY 10, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Transferred.


text:
    Olivier KOZEL, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Vanessa HANKINS, etc., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-2592
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    JANUARY 5, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    M & Y PLUMBING SERVICES, LLC, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. BAYAN GROUP, INC., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-1627
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    JANUARY 3, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Hershel WALKER, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-2105
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    December 22, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    GABLES INSURANCE RECOVERY, INC., etc., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-2311
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    DECEMBER 20, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.

Granted. Remanded.

Denied.


text:
    JAMES S. LAVOLD, INC., etc., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. ORACLE ELEVATOR COMPANY, etc., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-2145
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    DECEMBER 19, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Appeal is granted. Dismissed.


text:
    Stephen D. LEONARD, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-2661
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    DECEMBER 27, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Mandamus is dismissed.


text:
    Willie ROGERS, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-2273
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    DECEMBER 22, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Mark WILLIAM, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. RUDA INVESTMENTS, LLC, etc., et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-2314
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    DECEMBER 21, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Granted. Dismissed.


text:
    Lee ROHE and Susan Rohe, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-2335
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    DECEMBER 20, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Pleadro J. SCOTT, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-2720
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    DECEMBER 27, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Douglas Montgomery LLOYD, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Julie L. JONES, etc., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-2736
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    DECEMBER 22, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Archie Bernard SUMMERALL, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-2745
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    DECEMBER 22, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Geronimo PEREZ, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-2750
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    DECEMBER 22, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Ernest STATEN, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-0136
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    DECEMBER 14, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Lazaro RODRIGUEZ, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-1119
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    DECEMBER 14, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    CITY OF MIAMI, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Cesar J. ALAS, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-1638
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    DECEMBER 13, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Michelle ADAMS and Luisa Farbman, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Max ADAMS, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-1891
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    OCTOBER 11, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Granted. Dismissed.

Denied.


text:
    Osmany CROSWELL, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT PROGRAM, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-2187
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    DECEMBER 15, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    The WHITING-TURNER CONTRACTING COMPANY, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. LOFT DOWNTOWN II CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-2409
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    DECEMBER 15, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Angela MOLINA, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. AURORA LOAN SERVICES, LLC, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-1950
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    December 14, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Alexis ORTEGA, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-2281
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    DECEMBER 13, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Edwin L. DEMPS, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-2544
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    December 19, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    John Carlos CAIRO, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-2674
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    DECEMBER 15, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Emmanuel JACKSON, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-2652
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    DECEMBER 14, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Joseph J. DEMTY, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. U.S. BANK, N.A., etc., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-2657
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    DECEMBER 14, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    PALM BAY TOWERS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. PALM BAY CONDOMINIUM, INC., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-1996
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    JANUARY 16, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Derek DAVID, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-1514
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    DECEMBER 20, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Felix I. GASPARD, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-2692
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    DECEMBER 19, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Antonio JOHNSON, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. 11TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-2696
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    DECEMBER 19, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Denied.


text:
    Craig KRAUSE, Sr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D17-3381
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [May 24, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Marquis W. ALFRED, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-36
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [March 1, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Nathalian MALO, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The BANK OF NEW YORK, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
    CASE NO.: 3D17-0092
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    DECEMBER 21, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Granted.

Dismissed.


text:
    Jose A. FRANCO, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT PROGRAM, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s)
    CASE NO.: 3D17-2196
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    DECEMBER 19, 2017
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Dismissed.


text:
    Van JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-766
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [May 31, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Justin Anthony GIOVINAZZO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-671
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [May 31, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Teah WIMBERLY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-1033
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [May 31, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Conraad L. HOEVER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D17-3678
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [May 24, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    N.B., the mother, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, and Guardian ad Litem Program, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-565
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [June 19, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Leandro Gonzalez RAMIREZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D17-3795
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [June 14, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Rajiv GRAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-904
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [June 14, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Terry Darnell ANDERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-281
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [June 7, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Douglas J. KOUFMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D17-3828
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [June 21, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    M.B., a child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-420
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [June 21, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Terry Jerome FERRELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-145
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [June 21, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Booker T. ROBERTS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-889
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [June 21, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Kimberly WHITE, Appellant, v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, Appellee.
    No. 4D17-3793
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [June 21, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Archie SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-1087
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [June 21, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Patrick Michael LONG, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-93
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [June 21, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Jumel FILIAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-108
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [June 21, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Nedd CHILDRESS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-0943
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [June 21, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Steven DAVIDSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-1027
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [June 21, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Ricky PORTALATIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-965
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [June 21, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Kevin M. ROLLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-994
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [June 21, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    KENT SECURITY OF PALM BEACH, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. CVE MASTER MANAGEMENT COMPANY, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.
    No. 4D17-3732
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [June 28, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Marc D. ANDREWS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-727
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [June 28, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Bertram CROCKER, Appellant, v. William J. TIGHE, Appellee.
    No. 4D17-3738
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [June 28, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Frank JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-1060
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [June 28, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Edith A. KELSON, Appellant, v. Earline Reese PETERSON, Claris Floretta Peterson and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Appellees.
    No. 4D18-116
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [June 28, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Rodney MADDOX, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-1056
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [June 28, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Ellen AGUIAR, Appellant, v. William NATBONY, as Trustee of the Thomas Kaplan 2004 Annuity Family Trust, which is the successor to the Thomas Kaplan 2004 Ten-Year Grantor Retained Annuity Trust, Adriana Aguiar, and Jannai Aguiar, Appellees.
    No. 4D17-3816
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [June 28, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Thomas RAUCH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-416
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [June 28, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    J.K.T., a child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-114
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [June 28, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Asbel Perez VICIEDO and Carlos Renda, Appellants, v. CREAL DALLAS, LLC, Appellee.
    No. 4D17-3812
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [June 28, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    David TIMMONS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-371
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [June 28, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    G.W., the mother, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, and Guardian Ad Litem Program, Appellees.
    No. 4D18-25
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [July 2, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    P.G.C., the Father, Appellant, v. V.C., the Mother, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-0618
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    June 29, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Daniel CARRASQUILLO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-722
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [June 28, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Antonio FIDDEMON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D18-982
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [June 28, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Raquel SCHOT, Appellant, v. Kevin SCHOT, Appellee.
    No. 4D17-3440
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [July 5, 2018]
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   Affirmed.


text:
    Robert MOORE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-285
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed May 22, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Kenneth Lee STARLING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D16-4178
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed May 1, 2018 Rehearing Denied May 30, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Willie B. HAMPTON, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-3412
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed April 10, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Daniel Preston BEATTY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-1319
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed June 12, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Lige Williams TAYLOR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-1065
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed June 12, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Jose Carlos DIAZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-969
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed June 12, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Billy JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-900
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed June 12, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Eric Deon MADISON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-2998
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed June 12, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Jermaine ROSS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-2970
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed June 12, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Daniel BOMYSOAD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-2920
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed June 12, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    James MUNOZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-774
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed June 12, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    James C. STANLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-184
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed June 12, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Elgin L. BELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-3853
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed June 12, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    David Eugene-Ellis PRUITT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-3757
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed June 12, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    James M. NEWTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-3260
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed June 12, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Timothy Fawn CAIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-3227
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed June 12, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Alex Dennis PULASKI, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-3166
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed June 12, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Christopher Robert MUZZI, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-2231
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed June 12, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Anthony COIMBRE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-2185
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed June 12, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Leigh Ann TURAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-1926
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed June 12, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    James Patrick WHITE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D16-4269
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed June 12, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Marcellus CHARLEMAGNE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D16-4041
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed June 12, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Decius G. JULES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-1032
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed June 12, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    David ROMERO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-746
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed June 19, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Freddie O. FELDER, III, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-308
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed June 19, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Louis D. VELEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-180
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed June 19, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Luis BATIZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-3017
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed June 12, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Thomas J. NEIL, Jr, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-164
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed June 19, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Alberto BADILLO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-70
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed June 19, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    J.L.S., A Child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-3948
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed June 19, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Henry Lee CALDWELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-3573
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed June 19, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Christopher MORRIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-3339
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed June 19, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Joshua Benjuly RAOUL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-2925
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed June 19, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Kimberly HODOM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-2654
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed June 19, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Devan Deshawn CARTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-2132
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed June 19, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    William J. MCCUTCHEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-1204
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed June 19, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Justin J. JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-896
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed June 19, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Edwin Herera SANCHEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-336
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed June 19, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Kevin Deon STEPLIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-3615
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed June 19, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    J.D.M., a Child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-3600
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed June 19, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Kelly LOUDERMILK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-2608
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed June 19, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    David GAYMON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-1042
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed June 19, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Roosevelt BRADLEY, II, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-542
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed June 19, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Teresa Antoinette HARE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-3674
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed June 19, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Malik Garcia STEPHENSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-2767
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed June 19, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Emilia L. CARR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-2545
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed June 19, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Michael G. STAVRIS, II, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-965
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed June 19, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Javier E. BALL, Firefly Lighting North America, LLC and Fujian Quanzhou Shuangheng Group, LLC, Appellants, v. Ramon RIVAS, Carolina Navarete De Rivas and Trans Los Gerardos Corp., Appellees.
    Case No. 5D17-1697
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed June 26, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    James T. AYERS, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-950
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed June 19, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Krystle NEGRON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D16-3134
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed June 19, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY as Indenture Trustee FOR MORTGAGE IT TRUST 2005-2, Appellant, v. Rosana MONTEIRO-KAMEL a/k/a Rosana Monteiro, Citibank National Association, successor in interest to Citibank Federal Savings Bank, Mirabella at Vizcaya Homeowners Association, Inc., et al., Appellees.
    Case No. 5D17-1999
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed June 26, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    Richard PIERCE, an Individual, and the Brevard County Professional Firefighters, Local 2969, International Association of Firefighters, Inc., Appellants, v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF BREVARD COUNTY, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-1834
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed June 26, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


text:
    BPTR LLC, as Trustee Under the 130 Palm Land Trust, Appellant, v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee FOR AMERICAN GENERAL MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2010-1 AMERICAN GENERAL MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2010-1, Terence James, et al., Appellees.
    Case No. 5D17-1632
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Decision filed June 26, 2018
    DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
   AFFIRMED.


author: Levine, J.

text:
    James T. STENGEL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D17-1598
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [May 2, 2018]
    Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Ian Seldin, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Matthew Steven Ocksrider, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   Levine, J.

The state sought to involuntarily commit appellant as a sexually violent predator under the Jimmy Ryce Act. The state's expert examined appellant in July 2015. The trial commenced in February 2017. The jury found appellant to be a sexually violent predator. Appellant argues that the trial court should have granted a directed verdict since the state's expert evaluation was nineteen months old at the time of trial and therefore too "stale" to be considered by the jury as the basis for commitment. We decline to adopt appellant's suggested "bright-line" rule and find there was competent, substantial evidence upon which the jury could find appellant to be a sexually violent predator. As such, we affirm.

A week before trial, appellant sought a court order limiting each side to one expert witness. Appellant argued:

It is important to know that the defense does not plan on disputing the diagnoses that the State's doctors gave [appellant]. The crux of the defense in this case is that [appellant] does not meet criteria because [he] is not likely to reoffend (not that he doesn't have a mental abnormality). Additionally, the defense has no intention to dispute the state's experts on the STATIC score they assigned to [appellant].

At trial, each side presented testimony from one psychologist. Dr. Sheila Rapa testified for the state. She examined appellant in July 2015 and recounted appellant's history of sexually violent offenses.

In 1991, appellant followed a restaurant employee home, asked her if somebody was next door, and then asked to come in to use her telephone. After the woman let appellant in, he grabbed her and carried her upstairs where he forced her to perform oral sex and then vaginally raped her. Afterwards, he forced her to wash in the shower.

Two days later, he grabbed a woman as she was leaving the spa and pulled her down to the embankment of a canal. He held a knife to her throat and told her to be quiet. He digitally penetrated her while he masturbated. He ejaculated on her and wiped it off with a towel. He then forced her to perform oral sex on him.

In 1992, appellant approached a woman walking to her apartment and asked her where somebody lived. When she said she did not know, he asked for a piece of paper to write on. When the woman tried to close her apartment door to get him a piece of paper, he pushed his way in, pulled her shirt over her head, and put his mouth on her breasts. He forced her to the bedroom and digitally penetrated her. He ran out of the apartment when he thought he heard somebody come in. He then broke a window and came back in while she was on the phone trying to call 911, but left after the woman promised not to call anybody.

Right after that crime, appellant knocked on another door and asked a woman if somebody lived there. She thought it was suspicious, so she wrote down his license plate number. Based on this information, the police apprehended appellant. DNA evidence connected him to the two 1991 cases. Appellant pled no contest and was sentenced to prison. He was placed on sex offender probation following his release from prison in 2003.

While on probation in 2007, appellant removed a window screen and peeped into a woman's house while masturbating. He fled after a young girl saw him. The police apprehended appellant and he was sentenced to eleven years in prison.

According to Dr. Rapa, appellant has a long history of sexualized behaviors and sexual preoccupation. Since the 1980s, appellant has "cruised" around looking for people to masturbate to, engaged in voyeurism, and fantasized about rape. Although appellant had undergone outpatient sex offender treatment after the 2007 offense and had all the skills necessary to not reoffend, he had not changed his behavior.

Dr. Rapa administered the Static 99-R which consists of ten questions to evaluate appellant's likelihood to sexually reoffend. Factors that made appellant more likely to offend included his previous conviction for kidnapping, prior sex offenses, prior sentencing dates (i.e., number of previous times before the court), non-contact sex offenses (voyeurism), unrelated victims, and stranger victims. Appellant's age of fifty-five made him less likely to offend. Dr. Rapa gave appellant a score of seven, which was well above average and high risk. Based on the Static 99-R, appellant's chance of recidivism was 27.5% in five years and a 43% in ten years.

Dr. Rapa diagnosed appellant with "other specified paraphilic disorder, non-consent, in a controlled environment" as well as voyeuristic disorder and anti-social personality disorder. She opined there would be a higher risk of recidivism with this combination of diagnoses. Further, appellant had intimacy deficits which could play a role in appellant reoffending. Dr. Rapa concluded that based on her evaluation of appellant, he needed to be in a secure facility since his sexual deviant drive was very strong and he was likely to reoffend if he was not in a secure facility.

Appellant's expert, Dr. Robin Wilson, diagnosed appellant with "other specified paraphilic order, and the specifier for that courtship disorder with features of voyeurism, exhibitionism, fotteurism and coercive sexuality." Dr. Wilson did not diagnose appellant with a personality disorder. The record on appeal does not reflect when Dr. Wilson examined appellant.

Dr. Wilson also evaluated appellant using the Static 99-R and gave him a score of seven, which was the same as Dr. Rapa's evaluation. Dr. Wilson concluded that appellant was unlikely to re-engage in sexually violent offenses and that appellant did not pose a danger to the community.

At the close of all the evidence, appellant moved for a directed verdict, arguing that Dr. Rapa's evaluation was "stale" because nineteen months had passed between the time of the evaluation and the date of Dr. Rapa's testimony to the jury. The trial court denied the motion for directed verdict, finding that Dr. Rapa's testimony had not become so stale as to not support a judgment. The trial court found that appellant's argument went to the weight and credibility that should be given to Dr. Rapa's testimony, not to its admissibility.

The jury found appellant to be a sexually violent predator. Appellant filed a renewed motion for directed verdict on the issue of the staleness of Dr. Rapa's testimony, which the trial court again denied. The trial court entered an order adjudicating appellant to be a sexually violent predator and committing appellant to the custody of the Department of Children and Families. Appellant appeals this order.

We review de novo the denial of appellant's motion for directed verdict. Meruelo v. Mark Andrew of Palm Beaches, Ltd. , 12 So.3d 247, 250 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009). A trial court should grant a motion for directed verdict only when the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, shows that a jury could not reasonably differ about the existence of a material fact and the movant is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. Id.

In Jimmy Ryce Act cases, to be civilly committed as a sexually violent predator, the state must prove by clear and convincing evidence that the alleged predator "(a) has been convicted of an enumerated sexually violent offense; and (b) suffers from a mental abnormality or personality disorder that makes the person likely to engage in acts of sexual violence if not confined in a secure facility for long-term control, care, and treatment." State v. White , 891 So.2d 502, 506 (Fla. 2004) ; see also § 394.912(10), Fla. Stat. (2015). Thus, when "determining whether a person is a sexually violent predator, disputed expert testimony generally creates a question for the jury such that a directed verdict is improper." State v. Shaw , 929 So.2d 1145, 1148 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006).

Appellant relies on Hartzog v. State , 133 So.3d 570 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014). In Hartzog , the defendant was adjudicated a sexually violent predator based upon the testimony of two psychologists who had examined the defendant five years before trial. There, the First District found that the trial court erred in concluding the five-year-old evaluations were "legally sufficient to prove clearly and convincingly appellant's mental status at the time" of the defendant's trial. Id. at 576. The court found that relying on five-year-old evaluations did not "comport with the legislative design of the Jimmy Ryce Act." Id. at 574. In reaching this conclusion, the court referenced the fact that the statute requires that a person who has already been committed have a mental examination "once every year or more frequently at the court's discretion." Id. (quoting § 394.918(1), Fla. Stat.). Further, the court pointed out that once a person has already been committed, he "may be entitled to a non-jury trial on the question of his release as often as once a year." Id.

Hartzog did not create a bright-line rule stating that all evaluations become stale after one year. Nor do we believe that the statute mandates such a bright-line rule. Nowhere in the plain language of the statute is there any requirement of an evaluation within the year preceding trial. See §§ 394.917, 394.918, Fla. Stat. Rather, the statutory language centers on the right, post-trial, to an annual review and evaluation due to the nature of the commitment. See § 394.918, Fla. Stat. Further, as a practical matter, creating such a bright-line pre-trial rule would have the potential unintended effect of delaying the trial of the alleged predator until every testifying doctor had evaluated the alleged predator within one year of the trial date.

Although not explicitly referenced by the Hartzog court, due process considerations provide a separate basis to reject a five-year-old evaluation. To the extent Hartzog determined that five-year-old evaluations were legally insufficient evidence, we find that due process considerations would render a five-year-old evaluation insufficient. See Kansas v. Hendricks , 521 U.S. 346, 356-57, 117 S.Ct. 2072, 138 L.Ed.2d 501 (1997) (recognizing that due process in the context of involuntary commitment requires proper procedures and evidentiary standards); Tibbs v. Florida , 457 U.S. 31, 45, 102 S.Ct. 2211, 72 L.Ed.2d 652 (1982) (stating that "the Due Process Clause forbids any conviction based on evidence insufficient to persuade a rational factfinder of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt").

However, in this case, the delay of nineteen months from evaluation to trial does not even come close to the five year delay evidenced in Hartzog . Thus, we find no statutory or due process concerns in utilizing an evaluation made only nineteen months before the time of trial.

Finally, it is worth noting that appellant's pre-trial motion to limit the number of expert witnesses did not allege that Dr. Rapa's evaluation was stale, notwithstanding the fact that the motion was filed only a week before trial. Rather, appellant admitted that he was not planning on disputing the diagnoses or Static 99-R score given by the state's doctors and that the crux of the defense was that appellant was not likely to reoffend.

In summary, we find that the trial court did not err in denying appellant's motion for directed verdict. The trial court correctly found that the age of the evaluation-nineteen months-went only to the weight and credibility of Dr. Rapa's testimony, which were questions for the jury to decide. Thus, we affirm.

Affirmed .

Warner and Gross, JJ., concur.


author: Damoorgian, J.

text:
    Rayquan BURGESS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D16-3274
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [May 9, 2018]
    Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Erika Follmer, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Luke R. Napodano, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   Damoorgian, J.

Rayquan Burgess appeals his conviction and sentence for one count of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. Although Appellant raises several issues on appeal, we find merit in only one of his arguments, namely that the trial court erroneously denied two of his cause challenges during jury selection.

During voir dire, defense counsel told the prospective jurors that Appellant was a convicted felon and asked whether they would still be able to deliberate without knowing more about the felony conviction. The following colloquy ensued with prospective juror 1.7:

[1.7]: I know it has nothing to do with it. I know it's irrelevant to the case but my gut curiosity.... It doesn't affect the case. I understand.
[DEFENSE COUNSEL]: You want to know, right, but if you didn't know do you think you would still be able to deliberate and make a decision?
[1.7]: Yes. I think the problem for me in my honest opinion if he's been convicted of a felony already and then where there's smoke there's fire. It's almost like I know we have to prove that he is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. But just that notion that something has already happened in the past, which I don't like that but that's just what-
...
[DEFENSE COUNSEL]: I'm going to reduce what you said down to something. Let me know if this is accurate, okay. I don't want to put words in your mouth. It sounds to me what you're saying is if we have a trial with someone who's never had any criminal exposure to the system-this whole presumption of innocence thing I would be able to do it 100 percent. But when I find out that someone has a felony conviction it makes it more difficult for me to presume them 100 [percent] innocent at the start of trial?
[1.7]: Yes, it would make it more difficult than-right.

Towards the end of voir dire, defense counsel asked the prospective jurors whether Appellant's prior felony conviction would weigh into their deliberation when assessing whether the State had met its burden of proof. Prospective juror 1.7 answered that it would "probably affect [his] decision." Defense counsel thereafter attempted to clarify prospective juror 1.7's response by asking "[y]ou think it would affect your decision? You know it's not supposed to, but it might?" Prospective juror 1.7 responded "[y]es." Prospective juror 1.2, in turn, responded similarly:

[1.2]: [It shows] bad judgment prior to accept that first felony. I mean bad judgment, it's in the back of my head.
[DEFENSE COUNSEL]: Do you think that it's going to be something that's going to weigh into your deliberation when a[ss]essing whether or not the State's met its burden? ...
[1.2]: Yes.
[DEFENSE COUNSEL]: You think it might?
[1.2]: Yes, ma'am.

Based on the foregoing, defense counsel moved to strike prospective jurors 1.7 and 1.2 for cause. After the trial court denied those motions, defense counsel exercised two peremptory challenges to excuse those two jurors. Later, defense counsel requested two additional peremptories to strike two remaining objectionable jurors. The court, however, only granted defense counsel one additional peremptory. This appeal follows.

"The test for determining juror competency is whether the juror can lay aside any bias or prejudice and render his verdict solely upon the evidence presented and the instructions on the law given to him by the court." Lusk v. State , 446 So.2d 1038, 1041 (Fla. 1984). "While the initial determination of a juror's competence for cause rests with the trial court's discretion, this discretion is not limitless." Ranglin v. State , 55 So.3d 744, 746 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011). "Abuse of discretion occurs when the record reveals a reason to doubt impartiality." Id.

In the instant case, although prospective juror 1.7 initially indicated that Appellant's prior felony conviction was irrelevant, he nonetheless clearly stated that the felony conviction would make it more difficult for him to presume Appellant innocent and would weigh into his deliberations. Prospective juror 1.7 even stated "where there's smoke there's fire" when referring to the prior felony conviction. These comments clearly reflect that prospective juror 1.7 did not have the "state of mind which w[ould] enable him to render an impartial verdict based solely on the evidence submitted and the law announced at the trial." Carratelli v. State , 961 So.2d 312, 318 (Fla. 2007) (alteration in original) (quoting Singer v. State , 109 So.2d 7, 23-24 (Fla. 1959) ).

Likewise, prospective juror 1.2's comment that the prior felony conviction reflected bad judgment on Appellant's part and that he would keep that felony conviction in the back of his mind when deliberating created a reasonable doubt as to whether he could render a fair and impartial verdict. See Carratelli , 961 So.2d at 318. This doubt, in turn, should have been resolved in favor of granting Appellant's cause challenge. See Bryant v. State , 765 So.2d 68, 71 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (holding that "[c]lose cases should be resolved in favor of excusing the juror rather than leaving a doubt as to his or her impartiality" (quoting Chapman v. State , 593 So.2d 605, 606 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992) ) ).

Having determined that the court erroneously denied Appellant's cause challenges as to two prospective jurors, we must now determine whether the erroneous rulings require a new trial. It is well established that the "expenditure of a peremptory challenge to cure the trial court's improper denial of a cause challenge constitutes reversible error if a defendant exhausts all remaining peremptory challenges and can show that an objectionable juror has served on the jury." Busby v. State , 894 So.2d 88, 96-97 (Fla. 2004). "This juror must be an individual who actually sat on the jury and whom the defendant either challenged for cause or attempted to challenge peremptorily or otherwise objected to after his peremptory challenges had been exhausted." Id. at 97 (quoting Trotter v. State , 576 So.2d 691, 693 (Fla. 1991) ). "A defendant cannot demonstrate prejudice if the trial court grants the same number of additional peremptories as cause challenges that were erroneously denied." Id.

Here, after the trial court denied Appellant's cause challenges as to prospective jurors 1.7 and 1.2, Appellant exercised two peremptories to remove those jurors. After exhausting all remaining peremptories, Appellant then identified two objectionable jurors and requested two additional peremptories. The trial court, however, only granted Appellant one additional peremptory despite having erroneously denied two cause challenges. Consequently, an objectionable juror ended up serving on the jury. As this constitutes reversible error, we reverse and remand for a new trial.

Reversed and remanded for a new trial.

Gerber, C.J., and Klingensmith, J., concur.


author: Per Curiam.

text:
    R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Appellant, v. Alan KONZELMAN, As Personal Representative of the Estate of Eleanor Konzelman, Appellee.
    No. 4D16-4310
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [May 9, 2018]
    Ashley C. Parrish of King & Spalding, LLP, Washington, D.C., and William L. Durham II and Val Leppert of King & Spalding LLP, Atlanta, Georgia, for appellant.
    John S. Mills and Courtney Brewer of The Mills Firm, P.A., Tallahassee, and Eric S. Rosen of Kelley Uustal, PLC, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.
   Per Curiam.

Appellant R.J. Reynolds raises several issues on appeal, and we affirm as to all of them. With regard to the applicable punitive damages statute, we agree with the First and Second District Courts of Appeal in holding that the pre-1999 version of section 768.73, Florida Statutes, applies in an Engle progeny personal injury suit that is converted into a wrongful death action upon the smoker's death. See R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Allen for Estate of Allen , 228 So.3d 684, 689-90 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) ; R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Evers , 232 So.3d 457, 462-63 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017) ; see also R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Buonomo , 138 So.3d 1049, 1052 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (noting that parties did not dispute applicability of pre-1999 version of punitive damages statute), quashed on other grounds sub nom. , 41 Fla. L. Weekly S113, 2016 WL 374082 (Jan. 26, 2016).

With regard to the issue raised on cross-appeal, we find that the trial court erred in reducing the compensatory award based on comparative fault. See Schoeff v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. , 232 So.3d 294, 305 (Fla. 2017). We therefore reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with the Florida Supreme Court's opinion.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for further proceedings.

Levine, Conner and Forst, JJ., concur.


author: MAY, J.

text:
    CAREFIRST OF MARYLAND, INC., Appellant, v. RECOVERY VILLAGE AT UMATILLA, LLC., et al., Appellees.
    No. 4D17-2247
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [May 23, 2018]
    Daniel L. Wallach of Becker & Poliakoff, Fort Lauderdale, Patrick de Gravelles, Washington, DC, and Anthony F. Shelley of Miller & Chevalier Chartered, Washington, DC, for appellant.
    Glenn J. Waldman of Waldman Trigoboff Hildebrandt & Calnan, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.
   MAY, J.

Personal jurisdiction is contested in this appeal from an order denying a motion to dismiss a second amended complaint. Appellant Carefirst ("the defendant") argues the trial court erred in finding specific personal jurisdiction over it. We agree and reverse.

The defendant is a Maryland-based insurance company that sells health insurance policies to Maryland residents and Maryland companies that may have employees outside of Maryland. It is a licensee of Blue Cross and participates in the Blue Card Program, which allows members to receive treatment nationwide while allowing the defendant to charge the in-state discounted rates that Blue Cross uses in that state. See St. Luke's Episcopal Hosp. v. La. Health Serv. & Indem. Co. , No. H-08-1870, 2009 WL 47125, *7 (S.D. Tex. Jan. 6, 2009). It also offers plans with out-of-network benefits at higher premiums.

The defendant does not own property in Florida, maintains no office in Florida, and does not advertise in the state. But, its customers can access a list of Florida providers on their website that directs them to Blue Cross's National Doctor and Hospital Finder through a link to the defendant as a licensee.

The defendant contracts with Florida Blue for Florida Blue to pay the health care providers, such as the plaintiff, a scheduled price determined by Florida Blue through the Blue Card program. The defendant then reimburses Florida Blue for paying the provider on its behalf. Appellee Recovery Village ("the plaintiff") is unable to contract directly with the defendant; it must contract with Florida Blue. The plaintiff is not in the Florida Blue network and allegedly did not agree to accept anything less than the full price for its services.

Between January 2014 and the present, eight of the defendant's members (all residents of Maryland) received treatment from the plaintiff, a Florida-based substance abuse and eating disorder facility. The plaintiff alleges that before providing services to the defendant's members, it contacted the defendant to verify their eligibility under their respective insurance policies. The defendant, or its agent, Magellan Healthcare, preauthorized treatment for three members.

The parties disagree about how the contact happened. The defendant argues the system is almost completely automated, and it is unlikely that any "person" approved the treatment. The plaintiff claims that it called the defendant multiple times for each member to get approval at various stages of treatment. The plaintiff also alleges the defendant initiated phone calls to it on several occasions.

In May 2015, the plaintiff filed suit against numerous defendants participating in the Blue Card Program, including the defendant, for underpayment on contracts. In February 2016, the plaintiff filed its first amended complaint for: (1) breach of express contract; (2) breach of implied-in-fact contract; (3) breach of implied-in-law contract; and (4) civil conspiracy.

The defendant moved to dismiss, arguing the first amended complaint did not allege sufficient grounds for specific personal jurisdiction. The trial court granted the defendant's motion. The court indicated the motion and appended affidavit were sufficient to rebut the plaintiff's prima facie jurisdictional claim.

The plaintiff then filed a second amended complaint, adding a description of the relationship between the defendant and Florida Blue that allegedly constituted minimum contacts sufficient to establish specific jurisdiction. The added allegations outlined the above-described relationship. It also alleged the defendant determined the amount of Florida Blue's payment to providers.

The defendant again moved to dismiss. It attached affidavits refuting that it intentionally advertised in Florida through its website and that it had control over what Florida Blue pays the plaintiff. The plaintiff responded and appended affidavits to rebut the defendant's affidavits.

The plaintiff's affiant attested that the defendant contracts with the plaintiff by preauthorizing treatment either directly or through its agent, Magellan. The plaintiff contacts the defendant for approval at each stage of patient care. He attested that treatment would not have been possible if the defendant had not preauthorized and approved treatment. He also attested the defendant advertised in Florida through its website, which links to Blue Cross's National Doctor and Hospital Finder website.

After a limited evidentiary hearing on the conflicting affidavits, the trial court denied the defendant's motion. It found the plaintiff had successfully established specific jurisdiction. The defendant now appeals.

It argues: (1) the trial court used the wrong analysis for personal jurisdiction; (2) it was the plaintiff, not the defendant, that intentionally established contact; and (3) it would be unreasonable to exercise jurisdiction over the defendant for its insured's "fortuitous" choice to obtain services in Florida.

We have de novo review of an order denying a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. Hamilton v. Hamilton , 142 So.3d 969, 971 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014).

To find that an out-of-state defendant is subject to specific personal jurisdiction, a court must determine that the defendant is subject to Florida's long-arm statute and has sufficient minimum contacts with the state to satisfy the Fourteenth Amendment's due process requirements. Kitroser v. Hurt , 85 So.3d 1084, 1087 (Fla. 2012). Here, the defendant concedes application of the long-arm statute, and restricts its argument to the defendant's lack of minimum contacts to satisfy due process.

First, the defendant argues the trial court used the wrong test in evaluating the existence of minimum contacts. It suggests the trial court relied on whether the defendant could "foresee" being hauled into court in Florida, rather than whether it purposefully availed itself of the benefits of Florida law through action directed at the forum state. Next, it argues that even if the trial court had applied the correct test, it incorrectly found the defendant had sufficient minimum contacts with Florida based on the facts of the case.

The plaintiff responds that the trial court used the correct test in evaluating minimum contacts. It maintains that, using that test, the trial court correctly found sufficient minimum contacts to allow Florida to have specific jurisdiction over the defendant.

The foreseeability test has consistently been rejected by the United States Supreme Court. See, e.g ., Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., San Francisco Cty. , --- U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 1773, 198 L.Ed.2d 395 (2017) ; Walden v. Fiore , 571 U.S. 277, 134 S.Ct. 1115, 188 L.Ed.2d 12 (2014) ; J. McIntyre Mach., Ltd. v. Nicastro , 564 U.S. 873, 131 S.Ct. 2780, 180 L.Ed.2d 765 (2011). And, both parties seem to agree on one thing: purposeful availment of the benefits of Florida law through action directed at Florida is the correct test to apply. That being said, they do not agree on whether the facts support the existence of minimum contacts under that test.

Our supreme court has held there is no specific jurisdiction where an insurer-offering national coverage-and an insured are residents of a foreign state and the insurer's only contact with Florida is a result of the insured's unilateral actions-getting into an accident in Florida. Meyer v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'n , 492 So.2d 1314, 1315 (Fla. 1986).

In Meyer , the insurer offered national coverage to its customers, but did not directly reach out to Florida nor did it direct its customers to Florida. Id. ; cf. Dollar Sys., Inc. v. Elvia , 863 So.2d 378, 380-81 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (distinguishing Meyer from a foreign insurance company that provided insurance for tourists vacationing in Florida, and finding specific jurisdiction in the latter).

Here, the defendant's website linked to Blue Cross's website, which directed patients to Florida providers. But, the plaintiff was not a listed provider in Blue Cross's network. And, neither the defendant nor anyone on its behalf directed the patient to the plaintiff provider.

"The unilateral activity of those who claim a relationship with a nonresident defendant cannot satisfy the requirement of [the nonresident's] contact with the forum state." Hanson v. Denckla , 357 U.S. 235, 253, 78 S.Ct. 1228, 2 L.Ed.2d 1283 (1958). There must "be some act by which the defendant purposefully avail[ed] itself of the privilege of conducting activities within the forum State[.]" Id. "This 'purposeful availment' requirement ensures that a defendant will not be haled into a jurisdiction solely as a result of 'random,' 'fortuitous,' or 'attenuated' contacts, or of the 'unilateral activity of another party or third person.' " Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz , 471 U.S. 462, 475, 105 S.Ct. 2174, 85 L.Ed.2d 528 (1985) (citations omitted).

Here, the defendant's contact with the plaintiff was based on its customers' unilateral decision to seek treatment in Florida. Correspondence with out-of-state providers resulting from a customer's unilateral move is not enough to establish specific jurisdiction over a foreign defendant-insurer. See, e.g. , Whittaker v. Med. Mut. of Ohio , 96 F.Supp.2d 1197, 1201 (D. Kan. 2000) ("[An Ohio insurance company] sending payment, notice of nonpayment, and other communications into Kansas, as a result of plaintiff's move to Kansas, are not legally sufficient to establish specific jurisdiction.").

The trial court relied on Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Del. v. Nat'l Alcoholism Programs/Cooper City, Fla., Inc. , 648 So.2d 231 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994) (" Blue Cross "), in discussing the defendant's pre-certification and payments to the plaintiff as a basis for finding minimum contacts. Significantly, the holding in Blue Cross was limited to the need for an evidentiary hearing when conflicting affidavits are filed. Id. at 234. And, in that case, the out-of-state patient's in-network doctor "referred the patient" to the Florida provider, and Blue Cross directed a Florida corporation to pre-certify the patient's treatment. Id. at 232-33. The provider in Blue Cross was an in-network provider. Id.

Here, the trial court conducted the requisite evidentiary hearing. Neither the defendant nor anyone connected to the defendant referred the patient to the plaintiff, and the defendant did not direct the plaintiff to get pre-certification from a Florida corporation. Unlike the provider in Blue Cross , the plaintiff does not participate in Blue Cross's network.

Nevertheless, the plaintiff depicts Florida Blue as the defendant's Florida agent and claims their relationship is enough to support personal jurisdiction. But, the defendant's relationship is closer to that of the insurer in Whittaker , 96 F.Supp.2d at 1201 (providing that the Ohio insurer used Blue Cross of Kansas to process claims of one of its Ohio customers who had moved to Kansas). There, the court held the foreign jurisdiction lacked jurisdiction over the out-of-state insurer.

The trial court erred in finding specific personal jurisdiction over the defendant under the facts of this case. We therefore reverse and remand to the trial court to dismiss the case against the defendant for lack of personal jurisdiction.

Reversed and remanded.

Warner and Forst, JJ., concur.

      The defendant challenged long-arm jurisdiction for the conspiracy claim, but the plaintiff indicated in its answer brief that it would be dismissing the conspiracy claim, mooting that portion of the appeal.

      The defendant also argues the trial court found personal jurisdiction because it advertised as a national network. While the court discussed the defendant's national scope, it ultimately decided "[the defendant] could reasonably anticipate being [hauled] into a Florida court ... as a result of its members receiving treatment from [the plaintiff] that was preauthorized by [the defendant]."