text:
    No. 11-7465.
    Aaron Ray Miller, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1132, 132 S. Ct. 1052,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 772,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 325.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 437 Fed. Appx. 353.


source: Caselaw Access Project

license: Public Domain

text:
    No. 11-7471.
    Marcus Knight, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1132, 132 S. Ct. 1052,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 772,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 57.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 443 Fed. Appx. 537.


text:
    No. 11-7472.
    Devin Edwards, Petitioner v. Kenneth S. Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.
    565 U.S. 1132, 132 S. Ct. 1052,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 772,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 62.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-7473.
    Alvin Eason, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1132, 132 S. Ct. 1053,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 772,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 237.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 643 F.3d 622.


text:
    No. 11-7474.
    Jorge Muentes, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1132, 132 S. Ct. 1053,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 773,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 254.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-7476.
    Brandon Laureys, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1132, 132 S. Ct. 1053,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 773,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 129.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

Same case below, 397 U.S. App. D.C. 339, 653 F.3d 27.


text:
    No. 11-7477.
    Lyndon Marlon Baptist, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1132, 132 S. Ct. 1053,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 773,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 17.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 646 F.3d 1225.


text:
    No. 11-7478.
    Jonathan Shub, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1132, 132 S. Ct. 1053,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 773,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 244.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-7479.
    Ollie Otis Reaves, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1132, 132 S. Ct. 1053,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 773,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 83.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 440 Fed. Appx. 140.


text:
    No. 11-7482.
    Mary Elizabeth Schipke, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1132, 132 S. Ct. 1054,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 773,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 281.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 446 Fed. Appx. 51.


text:
    No. 11-7485.
    Roy Toves Cabaccang, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1132, 132 S. Ct. 1054,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 773,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 78.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-7487.
    Reginald Mimms, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1132, 132 S. Ct. 1054,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 773,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 301.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 440 Fed. Appx. 192.


text:
    No. 11-7491.
    Ioseb Kharabadze, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1132, 132 S. Ct. 1054,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 773,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 95.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 655 F.3d 114.


text:
    No. 11-7492.
    Michael Kokoski, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1133, 132 S. Ct. 1054,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 774,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 22.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 435 Fed. Appx. 472.


text:
    No. 11-7493.
    Juan Juarez, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1133, 132 S. Ct. 1054,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 774,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 173.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 654 F.3d 753 and 436 Fed. Appx. 639.


text:
    No. 11-7494.
    Kenneth E. Fink, Petitioner v. Perry Phelps, Warden, et al.
    565 U.S. 1133, 132 S. Ct. 1055,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 774,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 235.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 448 Fed. Appx. 258.


text:
    No. 11-7496.
    Edward Dickey, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1133, 132 S. Ct. 1055,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 774,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 314.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 449 Fed. Appx. 290.


text:
    No. 11-7498.
    Richard Potts, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1133, 132 S. Ct. 1055,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 774,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 90.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-7502.
    Paul Blinkinsop, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1133, 132 S. Ct. 1055,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 774,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 60.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 606 F.3d 1110.


text:
    No. 11-7507.
    Terrence Graves, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1133, 132 S. Ct. 1055,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 774,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 64.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-7511.
    Steven D. Green, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1133, 132 S. Ct. 1056,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 774,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 366.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 654 F.3d 637.


text:
    No. 11-7516.
    Frank Allen, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1133, 132 S. Ct. 1056,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 775,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 44.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 644 F.3d 748.


text:
    No. 11-7518.
    Daniel Gonzalez-Garcia, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1133, 132 S. Ct. 1056,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 775,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 139.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 410 Fed. Appx. 827.


text:
    No. 11-7519.
    Humberto Garcia, aka Humberto Garcia-Toscano, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1133, 132 S. Ct. 1056,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 775,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 160.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 436 Fed. Appx. 357.


text:
    No. 11-7520.
    Wynell Gray, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1133, 132 S. Ct. 1056,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 775,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 340.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 648 F.3d 562.


text:
    No. 11-7522.
    Ahmad Toussaint, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1133, 132 S. Ct. 1056,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 775,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 51.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 430 Fed. Appx. 819.


text:
    No. 11-7524.
    Jesus Jose Lopez-Martinez, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1133, 132 S. Ct. 1057,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 775,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 114.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 438 Fed. Appx. 309.


text:
    No. 11-7526.
    Clifton Savage, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1133, 132 S. Ct. 1057,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 775,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 367.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-7527.
    Guadalupe Olmos-Olvera, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1134, 132 S. Ct. 1057,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 775,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 52.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 396 Fed. Appx. 163.


text:
    No. 11-7528.
    Eddy Alcantara-Ramirez, aka Eddy Confesor Alcantara, aka Eddi Alcantara-Ramirez, aka Eddie Confesor Ramirez-Alacantara, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1134, 132 S. Ct. 1057,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 776,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 116.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-7533.
    Desmond J. Murray, Petitioner v. Florida.
    565 U.S. 1134, 132 S. Ct. 1057,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 776,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 85.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, denied.


text:
    No. 11-7537.
    David Perez-Montero, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1134, 132 S. Ct. 1058,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 776,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 153.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 437 Fed. Appx. 549.


text:
    No. 11-7538.
    Larone Mills, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1134, 132 S. Ct. 1058,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 776,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 93.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 435 Fed. Appx. 489.


text:
    No. 11-7539.
    Edward George Robins, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1134, 132 S. Ct. 1058,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 776,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 14.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-7544.
    Sergio Perez, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1134, 132 S. Ct. 1058,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 776,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 42.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 442 Fed. Appx. 952.


text:
    No. 11-7545.
    Percell Burrows, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1134, 132 S. Ct. 1059,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 776,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 89.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 438 Fed. Appx. 180.


text:
    No. 11-7546.
    Shawn Edward Williams, aka Sean Williams, aka Shaun E. Williams, aka Shaun Williams, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1134, 132 S. Ct. 1059,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 777,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 82.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 438 Fed. Appx. 812.


text:
    No. 11-7548.
    Hung Nam Tran, Petitioner v. Wisconsin.
    565 U.S. 1134, 132 S. Ct. 1059,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 777,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 335.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, District II, denied.

Same case below, 332 Wis. 2d 803, 798 N.W.2d 319.


text:
    No. 11-7550.
    Richard T. Cabaccang, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1134, 132 S. Ct. 1059,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 777,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 71.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-7551.
    Lance A. D’Andrea, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1134, 132 S. Ct. 1059,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 777,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 172.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 440 Fed. Appx. 273.


text:
    No. 11-7552.
    Kenneth Early, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1134, 132 S. Ct. 1059,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 777,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 145.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 433 Fed. Appx. 695.


text:
    No. 11-7554.
    Miguel A. Chavez-Pulido, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1134, 132 S. Ct. 1060,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 777,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 113.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-7557.
    Vanessa D. Willis, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1134, 132 S. Ct. 1060,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 777,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 91.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 437 Fed. Appx. 269.


text:
    No. 11-7559.
    Nancy Morrow, Petitioner v. Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General.
    565 U.S. 1135, 132 S. Ct. 1060,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 777,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 73,
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-7561.
    Carlos Martinez-Vasquez, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1135, 132 S. Ct. 1060,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 778,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 115.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 438 Fed. Appx. 795.


text:
    No. 11-7563.
    Frank Pierre, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1135, 132 S. Ct. 1060,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 778,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 36.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 435 Fed. Appx. 905.


text:
    No. 11-7569.
    Randall Joseph Knope, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1135, 132 S. Ct. 1060,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 778,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 380.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 655 F.3d 647.


text:
    No. 11-7570.
    Jerome Wayne Johnson, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1135, 132 S. Ct. 1061,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 778,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 327.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-7571.
    John Tyler McKinney, Sr., Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1135, 132 S. Ct. 1061,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 778,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 49.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 427 Fed. Appx. 517.


text:
    No. 11-7572.
    Juan Felipe Rodriguez-Castro, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1135, 132 S. Ct. 1061,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 778,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 307.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 641 F.3d 1189.


text:
    No. 11-7573.
    Greta Crawford, Petitioner v. United States, et al.
    565 U.S. 1135, 132 S. Ct. 1061,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 778,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 88.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 432 Fed. Appx. 433.


text:
    No. 11-7575.
    Neal John Tibbs, Petitioner v. D. Adams, Warden, et al.
    565 U.S. 1135, 132 S. Ct. 1061,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 778,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 348.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 441 Fed. Appx. 443.


text:
    No. 11-7576.
    Wayne Carr, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1135, 132 S. Ct. 1061,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 779,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 46.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-7577.
    Wayland Thomas Wilson, Petitioner v. Keith Roy, Warden.
    565 U.S. 1135, 132 S. Ct. 1062,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 779,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 169.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 643 F.3d 433.


text:
    No. 11-7582.
    Adalberto Santiago, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1135, 132 S. Ct. 1062,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 779,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 124.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 643 F.3d 1007.


text:
    No. 11-7592.
    Isiah Ambo, aka Isiah Ambos, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1135, 132 S. Ct. 1063,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 779,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 86.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 430 Fed. Appx. 272.


text:
    No. 11-7593.
    Jesse Morales, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1135, 132 S. Ct. 1063,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 779,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 103.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 397 Fed. Appx. 883.


text:
    No. 11-7594.
    Harold D. Price, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1135, 132 S. Ct. 1063,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 779,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 41.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-7595.
    David Henry, Petitioner v. New Jersey.
    565 U.S. 1135, 132 S. Ct. 1063,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 779,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 468.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, denied.


text:
    No. 11-7598.
    Pedro Vazquez, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1136, 132 S. Ct. 1063,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 779,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 482.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 449 Fed. Appx. 96.


text:
    No. 11-7600.
    Kenneth Williams, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1136, 132 S. Ct. 1064,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 780,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 520.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-7601.
    Jose Sanchez, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1136, 132 S. Ct. 1064,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 780,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 451.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 438 Fed. Appx. 830.


text:
    No. 11-7604.
    Adam C. McClellan, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1136, 132 S. Ct. 1064,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 780,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 509.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 436 Fed. Appx. 479.


text:
    No. 11-7606.
    Adrian Jenkins, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1136, 132 S. Ct. 1064,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 780,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 528.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-7611.
    Terrance T. Burke, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1136, 132 S. Ct. 1064,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 780,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 424.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-7613.
    Charles E. Armstrong, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1136, 132 S. Ct. 1064,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 780,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 537.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 436 Fed. Appx. 501.


text:
    No. 11-7615.
    Risheen Daniel Robinson, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1136, 132 S. Ct. 1065,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 780,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 449.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 437 Fed. Appx. 733.


text:
    No. 11-7617.
    Paul Riesselman, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1136, 132 S. Ct. 1065,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 780,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 552.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 646 F.3d 1072.


text:
    No. 11-7623.
    Ted Russell Schwartz Murray, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1136, 132 S. Ct. 1065,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 781,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 428.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 648 F.3d 251.


text:
    No. 11-7624.
    Raul Ortiz-Miranda, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1136, 132 S. Ct. 1065,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 781,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 448.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-7631.
    Charles Soderman, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1136, 132 S. Ct. 1065,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 781,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 463.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 429 Fed. Appx. 663.


text:
    No. 11-7634.
    Pedro J. Prandy-Binett, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1136, 132 S. Ct. 1066,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 781,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 453.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-7635.
    Marcus Barrington, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1136, 132 S. Ct. 1066,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 781,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 475.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 648 F.3d 1178.


text:
    No. 11-7639.
    Vernon J. Autrey, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1136, 132 S. Ct. 1066,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 781,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 490.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.


text:
    No. 11-7640.
    Francisco Barrios, aka Lucio Rincon-Hernandez, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1136, 132 S. Ct. 1066,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 781,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 510,
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 441 Fed. Appx. 874.


text:
    No. 11-7642.
    Bradley Shane Sheppard, Petitioner v. Mildred L. Rivera, Warden, et al.
    565 U.S. 1137, 132 S. Ct. 1066,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 781,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 431.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 441 Fed. Appx. 980.


text:
    No. 11-7644.
    Robert Peter Russell, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1137, 132 S. Ct. 1067,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 782,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 515.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 432 Fed. Appx. 276.


text:
    No. 11-7649.
    Juan Bautista Castro-Cabrera, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1137, 132 S. Ct. 1067,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 782,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 427.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 452 Fed. Appx. 789.


text:
    No. 11-7652.
    Perry Reese, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1137, 132 S. Ct. 1067,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 782,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 541.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 442 Fed. Appx. 8.


text:
    No. 11-7653.
    Alan Suschanke, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1137, 132 S. Ct. 1067,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 782,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 522.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 641 F.3d 968.


text:
    No. 11-7655.
    Alejandro Diaz-Maldonado, aka Adan Diaz-Maldonado, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1137, 132 S. Ct. 1067,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 782,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 531.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 439 Fed. Appx. 854.


text:
    No. 11-7656.
    Hendy Collado, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1137, 132 S. Ct. 1067,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 782,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 511.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 439 Fed. Appx. 845.


text:
    No. 11-7663.
    George William Blood, Petitioner v. B. A. Bledsoe, Warden.
    565 U.S. 1137, 132 S. Ct. 1068,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 782,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 419.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 648 F.3d 203.


text:
    No. 11-7670.
    Stanley E. Vaughn, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1137, 132 S. Ct. 1068,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 782,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 437.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 431 Fed. Appx. 507.


text:
    No. 11-7671.
    Sagrario Valdez, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1137, 132 S. Ct. 1068,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 783,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 523.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-7673.
    Ervin Thomas, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1137, 132 S. Ct. 1068,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 783,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 422.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-7676.
    John E. Jefferson, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1137, 132 S. Ct. 1068,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 783,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 483.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 652 F.3d 927.


text:
    No. 11-7680.
    Freddie Mason, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1137, 132 S. Ct. 1068,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 783,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 429.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 440 Fed. Appx. 370.


text:
    No. 11-7681.
    Jack Deon Cooper, aka Donald Deon Jones, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1137, 132 S. Ct. 1069,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 783,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 443.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 445 Fed. Appx. 710.


text:
    No. 11-7684.
    James J. Parisi, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1137, 132 S. Ct. 1069,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 783,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 452.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.

Same case below, 658 F.3d 1.


text:
    No. 11-7686.
    Ponciano Torres, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1137, 132 S. Ct. 1069,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 783,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 439.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 433 Fed. Appx. 292.


text:
    No. 11-7693.
    Mario Smith, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1138, 132 S. Ct. 1069,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 783,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 539.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 648 F.3d 654.


text:
    No. 11-7697.
    Robert C. Daniels, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1138, 132 S. Ct. 1069,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 784,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 462.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 653 F.3d 399.


text:
    No. 11-7699.
    Alaa M. Al Jaber, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1138, 132 S. Ct. 1069,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 784,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 426.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 436 Fed. Appx. 9.


text:
    No. 11-7705.
    James W. Watson, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1138, 132 S. Ct. 1070,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 784,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 465.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 450 Fed. Appx. 571.


text:
    No. 11-7707.
    Christopher Rondell Rogers, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1138, 132 S. Ct. 1070,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 784,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 435.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 445 Fed. Appx. 644.


text:
    No. 11-7708.
    Sergio Manuel Ceja, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1138, 132 S. Ct. 1070,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 784,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 421.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-7709.
    Travis C. Davis, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1138, 132 S. Ct. 1070,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 784,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 533.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 443 Fed. Appx. 9.


text:
    No. 11-7712.
    Jesus Ulysses Arseo-Franco, aka Mike Allison Corrales, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1138, 132 S. Ct. 1070,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 784,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 441.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 439 Fed. Appx. 333.


text:
    No. 11-7716.
    Vida Deas, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1138, 132 S. Ct. 1070,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 784,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 544.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 452 Fed. Appx. 12.


text:
    No. 11-7720.
    Paul Conrad Sowden, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1138, 132 S. Ct. 1071,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 785,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 497.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-7727.
    Sergio Mujica, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1138, 132 S. Ct. 1071,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 785,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 487.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 442 Fed. Appx. 856.


author: Justice Sotomayor Justice Scalia,

text:
    No. 10-1548.
    Brenda Cash, Acting Warden, Petitioner v. Bobby Joe Maxwell.
    565 U.S. 1138, 132 S. Ct. 611,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 785,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 410.
    January 9, 2012.
   Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 628 F.3d 486.

Statement of

Justice Sotomayor

respecting the denial of certiorari.

The Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 requires that federal habeas courts extend deference to the factual findings of state courts. But “deference does not imply abandonment or abdication of judicial review.” Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 340, 123 S. Ct. 1029, 154 L. Ed. 2d 931 (2003). Congress stated in no uncertain terms that federal habeas relief remains available when a state court’s holding is “based on an unreasonable determination of the facts.” 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(2). In this case, the state court’s denial of relief to respondent Bobby Joe Maxwell was premised on its factual finding that there was “no credible or persuasive evidence Sidney Storch lied at [Maxwell’s] trial in 1984.” App. to Pet. for Cert. 137. Because the Ninth Circuit meticulously set forth an avalanche of evidence demonstrating that the state court’s factual finding was unreasonable, see Maxwell v. Roe, 628 F.3d 486, 498-506 (2010), I agree with the Court’s decision to deny certiorari.

Sidney Storch was one of the most notorious jailhouse informants in the history of Los Angeles County. During a 4 year period in the mid-1980’s, he testified in at least a half-dozen trials, each time claiming that the defendant had confessed to him in prison. See Rohrlich & Stewart, Jailhouse Snitches: Trading Lies for Freedom, L. A. Times, Apr. 16, 1989, p. 30 (“Said inmate Daniel Roach: ‘It seems that half the world just confesses to Sidney Storch’ ”).

Throughout this period, however, evidence mounted that Storch repeatedly was fabricating inmates’ confessions for personal gain. As even the State acknowledges, Storch’s signature method was to fashion inmates’ supposed confessions from publicly available information in newspaper articles. 2 Record 262. At Maxwell’s postconviction hearing, one former county prosecutor explained that he declined to use Storch in a high-profile 1986 murder case after determining “Storch was not telling the truth about [the defendant’s] alleged statements,” and had lied about having heard a confession at a time when he was not in the defendant’s cell. 9 id,., at 1824. Another prosecutor later refused to use Storch in a different case after discovering that his “testimony was similar to the newspaper accounts of the case.” Id., at 1825. In 1987, sheriffs deputies even confiscated a manual written by Storch instructing other jailhouse snitches how to fabricate confessions. None of this was out of character for Storch, who was discharged from the Army in 1964 because he was a “ ‘habitual liar,’ ” and was arrested repeatedly for crimes of dishonesty, including forgery, fraud, and false impersonation—including falsely impersonating a Central Intelligence Agency officer. 628 F.3d, at 498.

As the Ninth Circuit explained at length, both before and after Maxwell’s trial, various police officers and prosecutors believed Storch to be unreliable, dishonest, and willing to set up defendants for his own ends. At Maxwell’s postconviction hearing, one police officer described how Storch sought to “set. . . up” someone during a forgery investigation, 6 Record 1118; another detective testified that he would have put Storch on a Los Angeles Police Department list of unreliable informants prior to Maxwell’s trial. Not long after Maxwell’s trial, prosecutors refused to put Storch on the stand, believing him to have fabricated defendants’ confessions. And even the State conceded that Storch lied about a variety of material facts at Maxwell’s own trial, including his own criminal record and his motivation for testifying. This powerful evidence supported Maxwell’s claim that Storch falsely testified about Maxwell’s supposed confession—using precisely the same modus operandi that Storch used time and again to falsely implicate other defendants. See 628 F.3d, at 504-505.

The dissent labels all of this evidence “circumstantial.” Post, at 1143, 181 L. Ed. 2d, at 788 (opinion of Scalia, J.). It insists that it is possible that Storch repeatedly falsely implicated other defendants, and fabricated other material facts at Maxwell’s trial, but uncharacteristically told the truth about Maxwell’s supposed confession. Of course, that is possible. But it is not reasonable, given the voluminous evidence that Storch was a habitual liar who even the State concedes told other material lies at Maxwell’s trial.

Here, the Ninth Circuit recognized that 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(2) imposes a “daunting standard—one that will be satisfied in relatively few cases.” 628 F.3d, at 500 (internal quotation marks omitted). The court below found that standard met only after describing, in scrupulous detail, the overwhelming evidence supporting the conclusion that Storch falsely testified at Maxwell’s trial—attempting to manipulate the integrity of the judicial system as he did in numerous other cases. I agree with the Ninth Circuit’s determination. But even to the extent that the dissent sees error in that determination, the Ninth Circuit conducted precisely the inquiry required by § 2254(d)(2) and our precedents. “The principal purpose of this Court’s exercise of its certiorari jurisdiction is to clarify the law.” Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co., 556 U.S. 868, 902, 129 S. Ct. 2252, 173 L. Ed. 2d 1208 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting). Mere disagreement with the Ninth Circuit’s highly factbound conclusion is, in my opinion, an insufficient basis for granting certiorari. See this Court’s Rule 10.

Justice Scalia,

with whom

Justice Alito joins,

dissenting from denial of cer-tiorari.

The Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA) put an end to federal-district-court readjudication of issues already decided, with full due process of law, in state criminal cases. It provides that a writ of habeas corpus challenging a state criminal conviction shall not be granted with respect to any claim “adjudicated on the merits in State court proceedings,” unless that state adjudication

“(1) resulted in a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States; or
“(2) resulted in a decision that was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the State court proceeding.” 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d).

We have called this a “difficult to meet. . . and highly deferential standard” which “demands that state-court decisions be given the benefit of the doubt,” Cullen v. Pinholster, 563 U.S. 170, 181, 131 S. Ct. 1388, 179 L. Ed. 2d 557 (2011) (internal quotation marks omitted). It forbids federal courts “to second-guess the reasonable decisions of state courts,” Renico v. Lett, 559 U.S. 766, 773, 130 S. Ct. 1855, 176 L. Ed. 2d 678 (2010).

I believe that in this case the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit unquestionably ignored these commands—thereby invalidating two 26-year-old murder convictions which the intervening loss of witnesses and evidence will likely make it impossible to retry. I dissent from the Court’s decision not to grant certiorari and summarily reverse the Ninth Circuit’s judgment.

I

In the late 1970’s, 10 homeless men were murdered in downtown Los Ange-les—a series of murders that came to be known as the “Skid Row Stabber” killings. Respondent Bobby Joe Maxwell was charged with all 10 murders, and in 1984 a California jury convicted him of two counts of first-degree murder and one related count of robbery. Maxwell was sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole, and his convictions were affirmed on direct appeal.

In 1995, Maxwell filed a habeas corpus petition in the California Supreme Court, alleging that a prosecution witness, Sidney Storch, had given false testimony at trial. Storch, a former cellmate of Maxwell’s, had testified that, after reading the newspaper account of a palm print’s being found at the scene of one of the murders, Maxwell stated he was not prone to that type of mistake because he “wore gloves with the fingers cut off so as to keep his hands warm and leave his fingers free.” 3 Record 537. The California Supreme Court issued an order to show cause whether Maxwell was entitled to relief based on his allegation of false testimony, returnable to the Superior Court. After conducting an evidentiary hearing that extended over the course of two years and included the testimony of more than 30 witnesses and the introduction of over 50 exhibits, the Superior Court issued a 34-page opinion concluding that Storch had not lied and denying the habeas petition. App. to Pet. for Cert. 137. In 2001, Maxwell again filed a habeas petition in the California Supreme Court, alleging, inter alia, that the State had violated his right to due process by failing to disclose certain evidence relating to Storch. See Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 87, 83 S. Ct. 1194, 10 L. Ed. 2d 215 (1963). The court summarily denied the petition. App. to Pet. for Cert. 105.

Maxwell then filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus under § 2254 in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, renewing his claims that his conviction violated his right to due process because (1) it was based on the false testimony of Storch; and (2) the State failed to disclose favorable and material evidence regarding Storch. The District Court dismissed the petition, id., at 47, but the Ninth Circuit reversed. Maxwell v. Roe, 628 F.3d 486 (2010).

II

A

First, the Ninth Circuit set aside the state habeas court’s determination that Storch had not fabricated his testimony. It based that action on nothing more than circumstantial evidence indicating that Storch was generally an untruthful person. For example, the court pointed to various mistruths Storch purportedly told at trial (regarding, for example, his criminal history and his motivation for coming forward). But as the Ninth Circuit itself recognized, those lies “d [o] not alone establish that Storch lied about the confession.” Id., at 501. The Ninth Circuit also concluded that Storch “misrepresented his sophistication and experience as a jailhouse informant.” Ibid. This finds no support in the record. App. to Pet. for Cert. 119-120. Storch’s only testimony as to his informant history was that he had never before testified for the district attorney, 3 Record 551; no evidence in the habeas record contradicts that. The Ninth Circuit went on to conclude that Storch had a history of falsely implicating individuals. But any evidence of this, as the state court noted, was highly speculative, see, e.g., App. to Pet. for Cert. 136—and two officers testified at the state eviden-tiary hearing that in various cases Storch had provided them with accurate and reliable information. Id., at 125-126. Finally, the Ninth Circuit accorded significance to trials subsequent to Maxwell’s in which Storch allegedly testified falsely. The state court had concluded that these post-trial events did not establish the falsity of Storch’s testimony, id., at 136-137, and the Ninth Circuit apparently agreed, see 628 F.3d, at 503 (“The evidence of Storch’s later lies under oath does not establish the nature of his testimony at Maxwell’s trial”).

In sum, the evidence relied on by the Ninth Circuit might permit, but by no means compels, the conclusion that Storch fabricated Maxwell’s admission. And that leaves out of account (just as the Ninth Circuit inexplicably did) the other evidence suggesting that Storch was not lying— including testimony that Maxwell confessed the crime, indeed confessed the crime much more explicitly, to two cellmates other than Storch. The statement of Justice Sotomayor makes its task far too easy by setting out to show the unreasonableness of the California court’s statement that there was “no credible or persuasive evidence Sidney Storch lied,” ante, at 1139, 181 L. Ed. 2d, at 785 (internal quotation marks omitted). It is not the court’s statements that are at issue here. To establish even a wild exaggeration is not to establish what § 2254(d)(2) requires: that the state court’s “decision . . . was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts.” The only factual determination necessary to support the California court’s decision was that Maxwell had not established that Storch lied. And it is of course that point to which the California court directed its attention. (“[Certain evidence] does little to establish whether [Storch] lied about [Maxwell’s] admissions in 1984.” App. to Pet. for Cert. 136.) What Justice Sotomayor calls “the overwhelming evidence supporting the conclusion that Storch falsely testified at Maxwell’s trial,” ante, at 1140, 181 L. Ed. 2d, at 786, consists of nothing more than evidence which establishes, at most, that Storch was an habitual liar. That may well provide reason to suspect that Storch testified falsely at Maxwell’s trial; or even to think it likely that Storch testified falsely; but it does not remotely support the conclusion that it was unreasonable to determine that Maxwell had not established that Storch testified falsely. In finding the state court’s determination not merely wrong but unreasonable, the Ninth Circuit plainly did what we have said § 2254(d) forbids: It “use[d] a set of debatable inferences to set aside the conclusion reached by the state court.” Rice v. Collins, 546 U.S. 333, 342, 126 S. Ct. 969, 163 L. Ed. 2d 824 (2006).

To make matters worse, having stretched the facts, the Ninth Circuit also stretched the Constitution, holding that the use of Storch’s false testimony violated the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause, whether or not the prosecution knew of its falsity. See 628 F.3d, at 506-507. We have never held that, and are unlikely ever to do so. All we have held is that “a conviction obtained through use of false evidence, known to be such by representatives of the State, must fall under the Fourteenth Amendment.” Napue v. Illinois, 360 U.S. 264, 269, 79 S. Ct. 1173, 3 L. Ed. 2d 1217 (1959) (emphasis added). This extension of due process by the Ninth Circuit should not be left standing.

B

The Ninth Circuit also concluded that the California Supreme Court unreasonably applied Brady. In its view, the prosecution committed a Brady violation by failing to disclose two pieces of impeachment evidence: (1) the difference between Starch’s original plea deal and the plea deal Storch negotiated independently from his public defender after he offered to testify; and (2) Storch’s cooperation with law enforcement officials in the years preceding Maxwell’s trial. The Ninth Circuit said that this evidence was material to Maxwell’s guilt, (which is what a violation of Brady requires, see Strickler v. Greene, 527 U.S. 263, 280, 119 S. Ct. 1936, 144 L. Ed. 2d 286 (1999)), because “Storch’s testimony was crucial to the prosecution’s case” and the evidence “could have been used to undermine” Storch’s credibility. 628 F.3d, at 512.

Neither of these contentions is remotely true. As for the “crucial” nature of Storch’s testimony: Storch was just one of four cellmates who recounted Maxwell’s incriminating statements, and there was ample other evidence of Maxwell’s guilt, including an eyewitness identification and evidence of Maxwell’s palm print near one of the murder scenes. And as for the potential utility of the undisclosed evidence in refuting Storch’s less-than-crucial testimony: According to the Ninth Circuit, evidence that Storch originally had a plea deal of 36 months, which improved to 16 months after he offered to testify, would have “provided Maxwell with impeaching evidence relevant to Storch’s motivation for testifying.” Id., at 510. But the jury already knew that Storch would not have testified without a deal. Storch said on the stand that he faced the possibility of six years’ imprisonment on pending charges and received a 16-month deal in exchange for his testimony; and responded in the negative when asked whether he “would be willing to bring forth this story and tell the D. A. to forget the kindness that he is showing towards” him. 3 Record 562-563. The additional knowledge that he secured a deal that improved his sentence from 36 months to 16 months (rather than from six years to 16 months) would have done nothing to reduce the jurors’ belief in his testimony.

The Ninth Circuit also erred in concluding that evidence of Starch’s prior activity as a police informant would have helped to contradict his testimony that he had never before testified for the district attorney. See 628 F.3d, at 511. The recitation of this non sequitur is its own refutation.

Finally, the Ninth Circuit’s conclusion that both pieces of evidence could have been used to establish Starch’s sophistication as an informant does not hold water. To begin with, the court erred in its belief that Storch “independently negotiated” the new deal, id., at 498. While it was true enough that Storch “worked a deal . . . without his public defender,” id., at 510, that does not establish that he negotiated a deal on his own. As Maxwell acknowledges, Storch “obtained a private lawyer to work out” the deal. Brief in Opposition 14. Moreover, the jury was aware of this fact because Storch himself testified to it. 3 Record 596. And it is incomprehensible how the substitution of a 16-month-instead-of-36-month deal for a previous 16-month-instead-of-6-year deal demonstrates Starch’s sophistication. Of similarly questionable value is evidence of Storch’s prior activity as a police informant. Contrary to the Ninth Circuit’s intimations, this would not have portrayed Storch as a wheeler-dealer who trumped up stories to receive decreased sentences. Indeed, there was no evidence that Storch received anything in exchange from the police, App. to Pet. for Cert. 125-126, and as I have described, supra, at 1143, 181 L. Ed. 2d, at 788-789, two officers testified at the evi-dentiary hearing that information he provided them was reliable.

In view of the evidence, it is not possible to say that the California Supreme Court’s denial of the claim “was so lacking in justification that there was an error well understood and comprehended in existing law beyond any possibility for fair-minded disagreement.” Harrington v. Richter, 562 U.S. 86, 101, 131 S. Ct. 770, 178 L. Ed. 2d 624 (2011). In fact, it seems clear that Maxwell was not entitled to relief.

It is a regrettable reality that some federal judges like to second-guess state courts. The only way this Court can ensure observance of Congress’s abridgement of their habeas power is to perform the unaccustomed task of reviewing utterly fact-bound decisions that present no disputed issues of law. We have often not shrunk from that task, which we have found particularly needful with regard to decisions of the Ninth Circuit. See, e.g., Cavazos v. Smith, ante, at 1, 132 S. Ct. 2, 181 L. Ed. 2d 311 (per curiam) (reinstating California conviction for assault on a child resulting in death); Felkner v. Jackson, 562 U.S. 594, 131 S. Ct. 1305, 179 L. Ed. 2d 374 (2011) (per curiam) (reinstating California conviction for sexual attack on a 72-year-old woman); Premo v. Moore, 562 U.S. 115, 131 S. Ct. 733, 178 L. Ed. 2d 649 (2011) (reinstating Oregon conviction for murder of a kidnaped victim); Knowles v. Mirzayance, 556 U.S. 111, 129 S. Ct. 1411, 173 L. Ed. 2d 251 (2009) (reinstating California first-degree murder conviction); Rice v. Collins, 546 U.S. 333, 126 S. Ct. 969, 163 L. Ed. 2d 824 (2006) (reinstating California conviction for cocaine possession); Kane v. Garcia Espitia, 546 U.S. 9, 126 S. Ct. 407, 163 L. Ed. 2d 10 (2005) (per curiam) (reinstating California conviction for carjacking and other offenses); Yarborough v. Gently, 540 U.S. 1, 124 S. Ct. 1, 157 L. Ed. 2d 1 (2003) (per curiam) (reinstating California conviction for assault with a deadly weapon); Woodford v. Visciotti, 537 U.S. 19, 123 S. Ct. 357, 154 L. Ed. 2d 279 (2002) (per curiam) (reinstating capital sentence for California prisoner convicted of first-degree murder, attempted murder, and armed robbery). Today we have shrunk, letting stand a judgment that once again deprives California courts of that control over the State’s administration of criminal justice which federal law assures. We should grant the petition for certiorari and summarily reverse the Ninth Circuit’s latest unsupportable § 2254 judgment.

      . The dissent suggests two police officers testified that Starch provided them “accurate and reliable information” when working with Storch several years before Maxwell’s trial. See post, at 1143, 181 L. Ed. 2d, at 788. In fact, when asked if Storch provided “accurate information,” one officer stated: “As far as I know, yes. I don’t remember any of this being either good or bad . . . 6 Record 1091. The second officer, when asked if Storch was a “reliable individual,” responded that “it would depend on what time,” id., at 1117, and noted that he had ceased all contact with Storch well before Maxwell’s trial, after Storch’s attempt to “set . . . up” a prospective defendant, id., at 1118.

      . The dissent implies that there was strong evidence suggesting that Starch was truthful. But the testimony by two other jailhouse informants who contended that Maxwell confessed to them, see post, at 4, was properly deemed “ludicrous” by the state appellate court. App. to Pet. for Cert. 174. One informant was committed to a mental hospital, and informed the district attorney before trial that his story implicating Maxwell had been “nothing more than a story of untruths founded by an ‘imaginary delusion.’ ” Tr. 6532. The other informant claimed that Maxwell confessed to 10 murders while raping him during the middle of the day in his cell. That story was refuted by another inmate, and when the informant attempted to obtain bail on the basis of his testimony regarding Maxwell, another court denied relief. See, e.g., id., at 6744-6754.
      The dissent also ignores that the physical evidence against Maxwell was largely circumstantial, and that the State’s prosecutor acknowledged that he had regarded the case against Maxwell as “weak from an evidential standpoint.” 9 Record 1844. Three men who briefly saw the killer provided a description of a man taller and heavier than Maxwell. And when Maxwell was placed in a lineup, and made to say a remark all three men had heard the killer say, none of the three identified Maxwell. One of the eyewitnesses even stated “you got everybody up there that doesn’t look anything like him.” Tr. 8641A.

       The evidence identified by Justice Sotomayor is similarly inconclusive, and the state habeas court reasonably discounted it. For instance, the so-called “manual,” ante, at 1139, 181 L. Ed. 2d, at 785, is all but illegible, 2 Record 461; as the state court recognized, the portions that can be read do not reveal whether Storch was instructing another inmate to “provid[e] substance or style.” App. to Pet. for Cert. 133. And the opinion of the prosecutor who declined to use Storch in a trial that postdated Maxwell’s by nearly three years, ante, at 1139, 181 L. Ed. 2d, at 786, was deemed “[u]nconvincing” by the state court, since it was based on [ail records of questionable accuracy. App. to Pet. for Cert. 134.


text:
    No. 11-122.
    Innovair Aviation Limited, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1147, 132 S. Ct. 999,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 790,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 567.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.

The Chief Justice and Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 632 F.3d 1336.


text:
    No. 11-350.
    NATSO, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. 3 Girls Enterprises, Inc., et al.
    565 U.S. 1147, 132 S. Ct. 1004,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 790,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 436.
    January 9, 2012.
   Motion of Rutherford Institute for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 641 F.3d 470.


text:
    No. 11-408.
    David H. Tullis and Michael S. Mack, Petitioners v. UMB Bank, N.A., et al.
    565 U.S. 1148, 132 S. Ct. 1005,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 791,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 499.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 423 Fed. Appx. 567.


text:
    No. 11-526.
    Richard W. Drake, Petitioner v. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, et al.
    565 U.S. 1148, 132 S. Ct. 1021,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 791,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 519.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 417 Fed. Appx. 84.


text:
    No. 11-568.
    Samuel Pierce, Petitioner v. Rona Woldenberg.
    565 U.S. 1148, 132 S. Ct. 1032,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 791,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 477.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari before judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-6385.
    James Roderck Brown, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1148, 132 S. Ct. 1003,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 791,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 444.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 653 F.3d 337.


text:
    No. 11-7270.
    Reginald Matheiw Castel, Petitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General.
    565 U.S. 1148, 132 S. Ct. 1037,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 791,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 470.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 427 Fed. Appx. 103.


text:
    No. 11-7294.
    Francisco Diaz Arteaga, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1148, 132 S. Ct. 1038,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 791,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 535.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 436 Fed. Appx. 343.


text:
    No. 11-7337.
    Dean Sacco, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1148, 132 S. Ct. 1040,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 791,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 440.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 650 F.3d 839.


text:
    No. 11-7338.
    Christopher Dallum, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1148, 132 S. Ct. 1040,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 792,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 516.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 11-7345.
    Arthur Lee Hairston, Sr., Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1148, 132 S. Ct. 1041,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 792,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 425.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 421 Fed. Appx. 310.


text:
    No. 11-7457.
    Robert Smith, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1148, 132 S. Ct. 1051,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 792,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 504.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 11-7459.
    Ramon A. Santos, Petitioner v. J. T. Shartle, Warden.
    565 U.S. 1148, 132 S. Ct. 1052,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 792,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 447.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 11-7508.
    Manuel De Jesus Hernandez-Hernandez, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1149, 132 S. Ct. 1055,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 792,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 524.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 437 Fed. Appx. 320.


text:
    No. 11-7530.
    Alfredo Digno Meza, Petitioner v. Donna Zickefoose, Warden.
    565 U.S. 1149, 132 S. Ct. 1057,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 792,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 420.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 443 Fed. Appx. 687.


text:
    No. 11-7534.
    Demauriae Nolan, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1149, 132 S. Ct. 1058,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 792,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 414.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 443 Fed. Appx. 259.


text:
    No. 11-7535.
    Paul Pennant, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1149, 132 S. Ct. 1058,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 793,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 545.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 11-7581.
    Russell E. Robinson, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1149, 132 S. Ct. 1062,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 793,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 568.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 11-7588.
    Juan Antonio Vazquez, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1149, 132 S. Ct. 1062,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 793,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 521.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 430 Fed. Appx. 741.


text:
    No. 11-7596.
    Mark McCreary, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1149, 132 S. Ct. 1063,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 793,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 432.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 425 Fed. Appx. 77.


text:
    No. 11-7614.
    Eric Flores, Petitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General.
    565 U.S. 1149, 132 S. Ct. 1065,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 793,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 446.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari before judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-7721.
    Willie Bud Reed, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1149, 132 S. Ct. 1071,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 793,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 536.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 11-7590.
    In re Ronald N. Totaro, Petitioner.
    565 U.S. 1109, 132 S. Ct. 1062,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 793,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 557.
    January 9, 2012.
   Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of habeas corpus dismissed. See Rule 39.8.


text:
    No. 11-446.
    In re Bernard Gerstner, Jr., Dale Sprague, and Ronald Cornelius, Petitioners.
    565 U.S. 1109, 132 S. Ct. 1005,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 793,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 498.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of mandamus denied.


text:
    No. 11-578.
    In re George Lawson Kelly, Petitioner.
    565 U.S. 1109, 132 S. Ct. 1037,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 794,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 494.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of mandamus denied.


text:
    No. 11-7022.
    In re Charlie Eastland, Petitioner.
    565 U.S. 1109, 132 S. Ct. 1021,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 794,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 562.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of mandamus denied.


text:
    No. 11-7229.
    In re Saeed Bakhouche, aka Abdul Razak Ali, Petitioner.
    565 U.S. 1109, 132 S. Ct. 1036,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 794,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 570.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of mandamus denied.


text:
    No. 11-7483.
    In re Yvette Square, Petitioner.
    565 U.S. 1109, 132 S. Ct. 1054,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 794,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 517,
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of mandamus denied.


text:
    No. 11-6882.
    In re George Roy Brown, Sr., Petitioner.
    565 U.S. 1109, 132 S. Ct. 1010,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 794,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 457,
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition denied.


text:
    No. 11-6994.
    In re Hector Barajas, Petitioner.
    565 U.S. 1109, 132 S. Ct. 1017,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 459.
    181 L. Ed. 2d 794,
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition denied.


text:
    No. 11-7076.
    In re John T. Vance, Petitioner.
    565 U.S. 1109, 132 S. Ct. 1025,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 794,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 455.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition denied.


text:
    No. 11-7091.
    In re Edward Mierzwa, Petitioner.
    565 U.S. 1109, 132 S. Ct. 1026,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 794,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 565.
    January 9, 2012.
   Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of mandamus dismissed. See Rule 39.8.


text:
    No. 10-1115.
    Javier Cavazos, Acting Warden, Petitioner v. Shirley Ree Smith.
    565 U.S. 1149, 132 S. Ct. 1077,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 794,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 559.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 1, 132 S. Ct. 2, 181 L. Ed. 2d 311, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7603.


text:
    No. 10-1441.
    Evans Jesus Fanor, Petitioner v. Carlos Alvarado, et al.
    565 U.S. 1149, 132 S. Ct. 1077,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 795,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 542.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 821, 132 S. Ct. 108, 181 L. Ed. 2d 34, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 6993.


text:
    No. 10-10267.
    Donald G. Jones, Petitioner v. Joseph Canizaro, et al.
    565 U.S. 1149, 132 S. Ct. 1077,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 795,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 546.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 832, 132 S. Ct. 132, 181 L. Ed. 2d 53, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 5757.


text:
    No. 10-10494.
    Donald G. Jones, Petitioner v. Travelers, et al.
    565 U.S. 1149, 132 S. Ct. 1077,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 795,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 571.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 838, 132 S. Ct. 147, 181 L. Ed. 2d 64, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 6474.


text:
    No. 10-10704.
    Tyrone Davis, Petitioner v. Troy Steele, Warden.
    565 U.S. 1150, 132 S. Ct. 1077,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 795,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 442.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 845, 132 S. Ct. 161, 181 L. Ed. 2d 75, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 6602.


text:
    No. 10-10709.
    Edward Washington, Petitioner v. Burl Cain, Warden.
    565 U.S. 1150, 132 S. Ct. 1077,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 795,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 543.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 845, 132 S. Ct. 162, 181 L. Ed. 2d 76, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 6425.


text:
    No. 10-10713.
    Charles Sanchez, Petitioner v. Lupe Aldrich, et al.
    565 U.S. 1150, 132 S. Ct. 1077,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 795,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 507.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 845, 132 S. Ct. 162, 181 L. Ed. 2d 76, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 6110.


text:
    No. 10-10949.
    C. F., Petitioner v. Superior Court of California, Riverside County, et al.
    565 U.S. 1150, 132 S. Ct. 1078,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 795,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 551.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 858, 132 S. Ct. 193, 181 L. Ed. 2d 101, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 6196.


text:
    No. 10-11019.
    Eric Jones, Petitioner v. Kenneth S. Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.
    565 U.S. 1150, 132 S. Ct. 1078,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 795,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 416.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 862, 132 S. Ct. 203, 181 L. Ed. 2d 108, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 6068.


text:
    No. 10-11189.
    Dwight E. Moss, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1150, 132 S. Ct. 1078,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 796,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 505.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 872, 132 S. Ct. 226, 181 L. Ed. 2d 126, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7016.


text:
    No. 10-11191.
    Richard Hamilton, Petitioner v. Kenneth S. Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.
    565 U.S. 1150, 132 S. Ct. 1078,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 796,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 471.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 872, 132 S. Ct. 226, 181 L. Ed. 2d 126, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 6614.


text:
    No. 10-11214.
    Brian Edward Griffin, Petitioner v. Pennsylvania.
    565 U.S. 1150, 132 S. Ct. 1078,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 796,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 560.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 873, 132 S. Ct. 229, 181 L. Ed. 2d 128, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7073.


text:
    No. 10-11265.
    Victor Charles Fourstar, Jr., Petitioner v. Steven Murlak, et al.
    565 U.S. 1150, 132 S. Ct. 1078,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 796,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 547.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 876, 132 S. Ct. 236, 181 L. Ed. 2d 133, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 6452.


text:
    No. 11-62.
    Rosalind E. Cazares and Adrian Jefferson, Petitioners v. Pamela Cosby.
    565 U.S. 1150, 132 S. Ct. 1078,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 796,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 518.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 881, 132 S. Ct. 247, 181 L. Ed. 2d 142, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 5431.


text:
    No. 11-125.
    Cynthia Holmes, Petitioner v. East Cooper Community Hospital, Inc., et al.
    565 U.S. 1150, 132 S. Ct. 1078,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 796,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 496.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 943, 132 S. Ct. 402, 181 L. Ed. 2d 258, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7427.


text:
    No. 11-150.
    Marteen Moore, Petitioner v. USC University Hospital, Inc., et al.
    565 U.S. 1150, 132 S. Ct. 1079,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 796,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 555.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 884, 132 S. Ct. 254, 181 L. Ed. 2d 147, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 5257.


text:
    No. 11-165.
    James Riffin, Petitioner v. Maryland Department of the Environment.
    565 U.S. 1150, 132 S. Ct. 1079,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 797,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 479.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 944, 132 S. Ct. 412, 181 L. Ed. 2d 259, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7383.


text:
    No. 11-171.
    Jacqueline Osmolski and Steven Osmolski, Jr., Petitioners v. New Jersey.
    565 U.S. 1150, 132 S. Ct. 1079,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 797,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 415.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 944, 132 S. Ct. 413, 181 L. Ed. 2d 259, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7264.


text:
    No. 11-255.
    Edward Tinsley, Petitioner v. Angela Q. Barksdale.
    565 U.S. 1150, 132 S. Ct. 1079,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 797,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 512.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 977, 132 S. Ct. 508, 181 L. Ed. 2d 348, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7715.


text:
    No. 11-298.
    Rosemarie Clampitt, Petitioner v. James P. Geurin, et ux.
    565 U.S. 1150, 132 S. Ct. 1079,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 797,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 525.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 1035, 132 S. Ct. 578, 181 L. Ed. 2d 422, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 8137.


text:
    No. 11-304.
    Peter A. Crawford, Petitioner v. Wolverine, Proctor & Schwartz, Inc., et al.
    565 U.S. 1150, 132 S. Ct. 1079,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 797,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 514.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 1035, 132 S. Ct. 578, 181 L. Ed. 2d 422, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 8136.


text:
    No. 11-308.
    Richard E. Thomas, et al., Petitioners v. Edward Alcoser, et al.
    565 U.S. 1150, 132 S. Ct. 1079,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 797,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 548.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 978, 132 S. Ct. 518, 181 L. Ed. 2d 350, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7890.


text:
    No. 11-331.
    Douglas Paul Marcello, Petitioner v. Internal Revenue Service.
    565 U.S. 1150, 132 S. Ct. 1079,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 797,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 529.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 979, 132 S. Ct. 523, 181 L. Ed. 2d 351, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7805.


text:
    No. 11-359.
    Miracle Star Women’s Recovering Community, Inc., Petitioner v. Katherine Jett, et al.
    565 U.S. 1150, 132 S. Ct. 1080,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 798,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 485.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 1046, 132 S. Ct. 589, 181 L. Ed. 2d 442, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 8103.


text:
    No. 11-5020.
    Felix Cruz Martinez, Petitioner v. L. E. Scribner, Warden.
    565 U.S. 1150, 132 S. Ct. 1080,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 798,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 469.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 885, 132 S. Ct. 259, 181 L. Ed. 2d 151, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 5514.


text:
    No. 11-5032.
    Joseph Pope, Petitioner v. Mark Bernard, et al.
    565 U.S. 1150, 132 S. Ct. 1080,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 798,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 445.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 886, 132 S. Ct. 261, 181 L. Ed. 2d 152, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 5323.


text:
    No. 11-5079.
    Carlos McGrew, Petitioner v. Carol Gilcrease, et al.
    565 U.S. 1150, 132 S. Ct. 1080,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 798,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 434.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 888, 132 S. Ct. 266, 181 L. Ed. 2d 156, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 5354.


text:
    No. 11-5098.
    Rhonda Taylor, on Behalf of Kevin R. Gordon, Petitioner v. Brad Livingston, Executive Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, et al.
    565 U.S. 1150, 132 S. Ct. 1080,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 798,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 488.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 889, 132 S. Ct. 268, 181 L. Ed. 2d 158, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 5219.


text:
    No. 11-5118.
    Maurice P. Olivier, Petitioner v. County of Los Angeles, California.
    565 U.S. 1150, 132 S. Ct. 1080,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 798,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 569.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 890, 132 S. Ct. 271, 181 L. Ed. 2d 160, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 5627.


text:
    No. 11-5135.
    Alton Leonard Slater, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1150, 132 S. Ct. 1080,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 798,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 566.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 891, 132 S. Ct. 273, 181 L. Ed. 2d 161, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 5465.


text:
    No. 11-5139.
    Darrell Nelson, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1150, 132 S. Ct. 1080,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 799,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 564.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 891, 132 S. Ct. 273, 181 L. Ed. 2d 162, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 5703.


text:
    No. 11-5143.
    Freeman Wray, Petitioner v. Cecilia R. Reynolds, Warden.
    565 U.S. 1150, 132 S. Ct. 1081,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 799,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 464.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 892, 132 S. Ct. 274, 181 L. Ed. 2d 162, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 5781.


text:
    No. 11-5258.
    Edward Gee, Petitioner v. John Kerestes, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Mahanoy, et al.
    565 U.S. 1151, 132 S. Ct. 1081,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 799,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 418.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 897, 132 S. Ct. 288, 181 L. Ed. 2d 173, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 5562.


text:
    No. 11-5417.
    Frank M. Bafford, Petitioner v. Midfirst Bank, et al.
    565 U.S. 1151, 132 S. Ct. 1081,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 799,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 563.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 1037, 132 S. Ct. 575, 181 L. Ed. 2d 425, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 8173.


text:
    No. 11-5427.
    Jeffrey Mathew Jeanetta, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1151, 132 S. Ct. 1081,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 799,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 454.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 906, 132 S. Ct. 310, 181 L. Ed. 2d 190, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 6169.


text:
    No. 11-5438.
    Hollis Wayne Fincher, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1151, 132 S. Ct. 1081,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 799,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 417.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 907, 132 S. Ct. 311, 181 L. Ed. 2d 191, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 6206.


text:
    No. 11-5478.
    Kenneth John Leuluaia-lii, Petitioner v. Stephen D. Sinclair, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary.
    565 U.S. 1151, 132 S. Ct. 1081,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 799,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 506.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 909, 132 S. Ct. 317, 181 L. Ed. 2d 196, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 5913.


text:
    No. 11-5493.
    Roger Larry McCluer, Petitioner v. Texas.
    565 U.S. 1151, 132 S. Ct. 1081,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 800,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 491.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 910, 132 S. Ct. 319, 181 L. Ed. 2d 197, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 6093.


text:
    No. 11-5515.
    Roger Palmer, Petitioner v. Rita Buge, et al.
    565 U.S. 1151, 132 S. Ct. 1081,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 800,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 412.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 912, 132 S. Ct. 322, 181 L. Ed. 2d 200, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 5946.


text:
    No. 11-5616.
    Larry Williams, Petitioner v. W. Thompson, Warden, et al.
    565 U.S. 1151, 132 S. Ct. 1082,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 800,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 501.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 947, 132 S. Ct. 406, 181 L. Ed. 2d 265, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7356.


text:
    No. 11-5620.
    Joseph Taylor, Petitioner v. Joseph Visinsky, et al.
    565 U.S. 1151, 132 S. Ct. 1082,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 800,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 474.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 947, 132 S. Ct. 406, 181 L. Ed. 2d 266, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7341.


text:
    No. 11-5642.
    Theodore Shove, et al., Petitioners v. United States District Court Judges, et al.
    565 U.S. 1151, 132 S. Ct. 1082,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 800,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 473.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 917, 132 S. Ct. 336, 181 L. Ed. 2d 210, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 5891.


text:
    No. 11-5664.
    Michael R. Ochoa, Petitioner v. Erin Rubin.
    565 U.S. 1151, 132 S. Ct. 1082,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 800,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 513.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 1037, 132 S. Ct. 575, 181 L. Ed. 2d 425, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 8249.


text:
    No. 11-5699.
    Stevie Wayne Johnson, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1151, 132 S. Ct. 1082,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 800,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 526.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 919, 132 S. Ct. 341, 181 L. Ed. 2d 214, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 6975.


text:
    No. 11-5814.
    Robert Mark Purchase, Petitioner v. Florida.
    565 U.S. 1151, 132 S. Ct. 1082,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 800,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 467.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 952, 132 S. Ct. 419, 181 L. Ed. 2d 273, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7442.


text:
    No. 11-5877.
    Tony Hawk, Petitioner v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security.
    565 U.S. 1151, 132 S. Ct. 1082,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 801,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 481.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 924, 132 S. Ct. 354, 181 L. Ed. 2d 223, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7100.


text:
    No. 11-5927.
    Mary Kay Baden, Petitioner v. City of Wheaton, Illinois, et al.
    565 U.S. 1151, 132 S. Ct. 1082,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 801,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 411.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 980, 132 S. Ct. 500, 181 L. Ed. 2d 353, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7766.


text:
    No. 11-5928.
    William M. Baker, Jr., Petitioner v. Gerdenich Realty Company.
    565 U.S. 1151, 132 S. Ct. 1083,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 801,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 534.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 952, 132 S. Ct. 422, 181 L. Ed. 2d 275, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7375.


text:
    No. 11-5936.
    David Derringer, Petitioner v. Arizona, et al.
    565 U.S. 1151, 132 S. Ct. 1083,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 801,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 572.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 980, 132 S. Ct. 501, 181 L. Ed. 2d 354, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7754.


text:
    No. 11-5962.
    Donald Joe Jelani, Petitioner v. Greg Province, Warden.
    565 U.S. 1151, 132 S. Ct. 1083,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 801,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 500.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 981, 132 S. Ct. 503, 181 L. Ed. 2d 354, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7845.


text:
    No. 11-5963.
    Wallace C. Jones, Jr., Petitioner v. Florida.
    565 U.S. 1151, 132 S. Ct. 1083,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 801,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 532.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 981, 132 S. Ct. 503, 181 L. Ed. 2d 354, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7806.


text:
    No. 11-6011.
    Cynthia Clanton, Petitioner v. Schlegel Systems, Inc., et al.
    565 U.S. 1151, 132 S. Ct. 1083,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 801,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 554.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 982, 132 S. Ct. 505, 181 L. Ed. 2d 356, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7784.


text:
    No. 11-6027.
    Mark Manzella, Petitioner v. Dave Dormire, Superintendent, Jefferson City Correctional Center.
    565 U.S. 1151, 132 S. Ct. 1083,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 802,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 556.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 982, 132 S. Ct. 506, 181 L. Ed. 2d 357, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7809.


text:
    No. 11-6054.
    Barbara Springs, Petitioner v. New York City Board of Education, et al.
    565 U.S. 1151, 132 S. Ct. 1083,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 802,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 456.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 983, 132 S. Ct. 507, 181 L. Ed. 2d 357, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7901.


text:
    No. 11-6063.
    Michael Lee Davis, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.
    565 U.S. 1151, 132 S. Ct. 1084,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 802,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 476.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 983, 132 S. Ct. 508, 181 L. Ed. 2d 358, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7856.


text:
    No. 11-6107.
    Judith Tompson, Petitioner v. Massachusetts Department of Mental Health.
    565 U.S. 1151, 132 S. Ct. 1084,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 802,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 438.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 984, 132 S. Ct. 512, 181 L. Ed. 2d 360, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7781.


text:
    No. 11-6119.
    Gilbert Washington, Petitioner v. School Board of Hillsborough County.
    565 U.S. 1151, 132 S. Ct. 1084,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 802,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 549.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 967, 132 S. Ct. 473, 181 L. Ed. 2d 302, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7585.


text:
    No. 11-6200.
    F. J., Petitioner v. Florida Department of Children and Families.
    565 U.S. 1151, 132 S. Ct. 1084,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 802,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 530.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 1016, 132 S. Ct. 553, 181 L. Ed. 2d 400, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 8058.


text:
    No. 11-6238.
    Stephen Richards Barker, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1151, 132 S. Ct. 1084,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 802,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 472.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 987, 132 S. Ct. 519, 181 L. Ed. 2d 365, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7763.


text:
    No. 11-6262.
    Annette Nash, Petitioner v. Neil B. Ptashnink, et al.
    565 U.S. 1152, 132 S. Ct. 1084,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 803,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 495.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 1038, 132 S. Ct. 580, 181 L. Ed. 2d 427, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 8106.


text:
    No. 11-6279.
    Linart Randolph, Petitioner v. McKither Bodison, Warden.
    565 U.S. 1152, 132 S. Ct. 1084,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 803,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 478.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 987, 132 S. Ct. 520, 181 L. Ed. 2d 366, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7881.


text:
    No. 11-6313.
    In re Theodore Shove, et al., Petitioners.
    565 U.S. 1152, 132 S. Ct. 1085,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 803,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 430.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 940, 132 S. Ct. 441, 181 L. Ed. 2d 289, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7170.


text:
    No. 11-6373.
    Damon Hudson, Petitioner v. Blaine Lafler, Warden.
    565 U.S. 1152, 132 S. Ct. 1085,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 803,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 527.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 988, 132 S. Ct. 524, 181 L. Ed. 2d 368, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7822.


text:
    No. 11-6391.
    Duane Edward Buck, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.
    565 U.S. 1152, 132 S. Ct. 1085,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 803,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 502.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 1022, 132 S. Ct. 32, 181 L. Ed. 2d 411, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7925.


text:
    No. 11-6415.
    Michael Petros, Petitioner v. Paul Boos, et al.
    565 U.S. 1152, 132 S. Ct. 1085,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 803,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 492.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 1041, 132 S. Ct. 588, 181 L. Ed. 2d 432, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 8219.


text:
    No. 11-6838.
    Steven L. Pinder, Petitioner v. Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction.
    565 U.S. 1152 132 S. Ct. 1085,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 803,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 413.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 1069, 132 S. Ct. 782, 181 L. Ed. 2d 501, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 8585.


text:
    No. 11-6926.
    Kevin McDonald, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1152 132 S. Ct. 1085,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 804,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 423.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 1045, 132 S. Ct. 600, 181 L. Ed. 2d 440, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 8212.


text:
    No. 11-6338.
    Oratin Pertil, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1152, 132 S. Ct. 1085,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 804,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 508.
    January 9, 2012.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 960, 132 S. Ct. 443, 181 L. Ed. 2d 289, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7239.


text:
    No. 11-5891.
    Sidney R. Miller, Petitioner v. In the Matter of the Application of the County Treasurer for Judgment and Order of Sale Against Lands and Lots Returned Delinquent for Non-Payment of General Taxes and/or Special Assessment.
    565 U.S. 1152, 132 S. Ct. 1086,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 804,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 458.
    January 9, 2012.
   Motion for leave to file a petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 966, 132 S. Ct. 459, 181 L. Ed. 2d 299, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7458.


text:
    No. D-2617.
    In the Matter of Discipline of Joseph John Hanna, Jr.
    565 U.S. 1107, 132 S. Ct. 1086,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 804,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 558.
    January 9, 2012.
   Joseph John Hanna, Jr., of Portland, Oregon, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.


text:
    No. D-2618.
    In the Matter of Discipline of John Joseph Zodrow.
    565 U.S. 1107, 132 S. Ct. 1086,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 804,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 561.
    January 9, 2012.
   John Joseph Zodrow, of Denver, Colorado, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.


text:
    No. D-2619.
    In the Matter of Discipline of David E. Fox.
    565 U.S. 1107, 132 S. Ct. 1086,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 804,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 433.
    January 9, 2012.
   David E. Fox, of Washington, District of Columbia, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.


text:
    No. D-2620.
    In the Matter of Discipline of Walter C. Elliott, Jr.
    565 U.S. 1107, 132 S. Ct. 1086,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 804,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 450.
    January 9, 2012.
   Walter C. Elliott, Jr., of Owings Mills, Maryland, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.


text:
    No. D-2621.
    In the Matter of Discipline of Glenn E. Culpepper.
    565 U.S. 1107, 132 S. Ct. 1086,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 805,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 550.
    January 9, 2012.
   Glenn E. Culpepper, of Silver Spring, Maryland, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.


text:
    No. D-2622.
    In the Matter of Discipline of David S. Moynihan.
    565 U.S. 1107, 132 S. Ct. 1087,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 805,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 503.
    January 9, 2012.
   David S. Moynihan, of San Diego, California, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.


text:
    No. D-2623.
    In the Matter of Discipline of Michael Joseph Melton.
    565 U.S. 1107, 132 S. Ct. 1087,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 805,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 540.
    January 9, 2012.
   Michael Joseph Melton, of Rolling Hills, California, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.


text:
    No. 11-678 (R46-006).
    Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Health and Welfare Fund, Petitioner v. Bio-Medical Application of Tennessee, Inc.
    565 U.S. 1152, 132 S. Ct. 1087,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 805,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 580.
    January 11, 2012.
   The petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in the above-entitled case was dismissed today pursuant to Rule 46.1 of the Rules of this Court.

Same case below, 656 F.3d 277.


text:
    No. 11-341 (R46-007).
    Qwest Services Corporation, et al., Petitioners v. Andrew Blood, et al.
    565 U.S. 1152, 132 S. Ct. 1087,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 805,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 581.
    January 12, 2012.
   The petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Colorado in the above-entitled case was dismissed today pursuant to Rule 46.1 of the Rules of this Court.

Same case below, 252 P.3d 1071.


text:
    No. 11-184.
    Carolyn M. Kloeckner, Petitioner v. Hilda L. Solis, Secretary of Labor.
    565 U.S. 1152, 132 S. Ct. 1088,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 805,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 583.
    January 13, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit granted.

Same case below, 639 F.3d 834.


text:
    No. 11-192.
    United States, Petitioner v. James X. Bormes.
    565 U.S. 1153, 132 S. Ct. 1088,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 806,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 584.
    January 13, 2012.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit granted.

Same case below, 626 F.3d 574.


text:
    No. 11-465.
    Javier Cavazos, Acting Warden, Petitioner v. Tara Sheneva Williams.
    565 U.S. 1153, 132 S. Ct. 1088,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 806,
    2012 U.S. LEXIS 582.
    January 13, 2012.
   Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.

Same case below, 646 F.3d 626.