text:
    No. 11-6402.
    Rodney J. Forness, Petitioner v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security.
    565 U.S. 1017, 132 S. Ct. 556,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 402,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 7946,
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 422 Fed. Appx. 66.


source: Caselaw Access Project

license: Public Domain

text:
    No. 11-6424.
    Zakaria Ajlane, Petitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General.
    565 U.S. 1017, 132 S. Ct. 557,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 402,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8042.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-6430.
    Edward R. Dumbrique, Petitioner v. California.
    565 U.S. 1017, 132 S. Ct. 557,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 402,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8007.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District, denied.


text:
    No. 11-6432.
    Calvin Carlos Campbell, Petitioner v. Florida.
    565 U.S. 1017, 132 S. Ct. 557,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 402,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8064.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District, denied.

Same case below, 65 So. 3d 1056.


text:
    No. 11-6433.
    Carl Donner, Petitioner v. Illinois.
    565 U.S. 1017, 132 S. Ct. 557,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 402,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 7932.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, denied.

Same case below, 408 Ill. App. 3d 1124, 376 Ill. Dec. 952, 1 N.E.3d 664.


text:
    No. 11-6446.
    David Donis, Sr., Petitioner v. Colorado.
    565 U.S. 1017, 132 S. Ct. 557,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 403,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 7953.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Colorado denied.


text:
    No. 11-6462.
    Kenneth Klym, Petitioner v. Bernard Warner, Secretary, Washington Department of Corrections, et al.
    565 U.S. 1017, 132 S. Ct. 557,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 403,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8035.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 438 Fed. Appx. 585.


text:
    No. 11-6490.
    Michael B. Demoe, Petitioner v. Steve Franke, Superintendent, Two Rivers Correctional Institution.
    564 U.S. 1018, 132 S. Ct. 558,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 403,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 7933.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-6510.
    Carl Brogli, Petitioner v. Oregon.
    565 U.S. 1018, 132 S. Ct. 558,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 403,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 7996.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Oregon denied.

Same case below, 240 Or. App. 464, 248 P.3d 451.


text:
    No. 11-6511.
    Richard D. Bassett, Petitioner v. California.
    565 U.S. 1018, 132 S. Ct. 558,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 403,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 7941.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District, denied.


text:
    No. 11-6560.
    Marcus Weatherspoon, Petitioner v. E.K. McDaniel, Warden.
    565 U.S. 1018, 132 S. Ct. 558,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 403,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8062.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 439 Fed. Appx. 660.


text:
    No. 11-6578.
    Jammie Lee Prince, Petitioner v. Colorado.
    565 U.S. 1018, 132 S. Ct. 559,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 403,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 7969.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Colorado denied.


text:
    No. 11-6612.
    Benjamin Sifrit, Petitioner v. John A. Rowley, Warden, et al.
    565 U.S. 1018, 132 S. Ct. 559,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 403,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 7954.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 438 Fed. Appx. 173.


text:
    No. 11-6613.
    Miguel Rivera, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1018, 132 S. Ct. 560,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 404,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 7998,
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 425 Fed. Appx. 386.


text:
    No. 11-6615.
    Gregory Byers, on Behalf of Nicole Byers, Petitioner v. Marlboro County School District.
    565 U.S. 1018, 132 S. Ct. 560,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 404,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8018.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 443 Fed. Appx. 859.


text:
    No. 11-6618.
    Gabriel Avila, Petitioner v. Mike McDonald, Warden.
    565 U.S. 1018, 132 S. Ct. 560,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 404,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8063.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 430 Fed. Appx. 598.


text:
    No. 11-6655.
    Ricardo Javier Arellano, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1018, 132 S. Ct. 560,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 404,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 7947.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 436 Fed. Appx. 152.


text:
    No. 11-6660.
    Alfonso Rubio-Ayala, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1018, 132 S. Ct. 560,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 404,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 7931.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 435 Fed. Appx. 755.


text:
    No. 11-6665.
    Lavertise Antwion Cudjoe, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1018, 132 S. Ct. 560,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 404,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 7975.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 634 F.3d 1163.


text:
    No. 11-6671.
    Israel Lara-Ventura, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1018, 132 S. Ct. 561,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 404,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 7951.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-6687.
    Lester Simmons, Petitioner v. Kenneth S. Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.
    565 U.S. 1018, 132 S. Ct. 571,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 404,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 7930.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.

Same case below, 12 So. 3d 753.


text:
    No. 11-6691.
    Danielle Biton, Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
    565 U.S. 1018, 132 S. Ct. 561,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 405,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 7967.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-6694.
    Michael Wigren, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1019, 132 S. Ct. 561,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 405,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8022.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 641 F.3d 944.


text:
    No. 11-6702.
    Keith Russell, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1019, 132 S. Ct. 561,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 405,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8008.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 426 Fed. Appx. 832.


text:
    No. 11-6722.
    Eric Wolfe, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1019, 132 S. Ct. 561,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 405,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 7978.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 442 Fed. Appx. 16.


text:
    No. 11-6730.
    Rod Garrett Borgersen, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1019, 132 S. Ct. 562,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 405,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8020.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-6735.
    Howell W. Woltz, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1019, 132 S. Ct. 562,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 405,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 7955.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 427 Fed. Appx. 249.


text:
    No. 11-6736.
    Karey Lee Woolsey, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1019, 132 S. Ct. 562,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 405,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8005.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-6738.
    Stephen Waltower, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1019, 132 S. Ct. 562,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 405,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8054.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 643 F.3d 572.


text:
    No. 11-6740.
    Quoc Boa Trinh, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1019, 132 S. Ct. 563,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 406,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8011.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-6742.
    Ranferis Lopez, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1019, 132 S. Ct. 563,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 406,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8015.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 427 Fed. Appx. 561.


text:
    No. 11-6743.
    Charles Landwer, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1019, 132 S. Ct. 563,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 406,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8073.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 640 F.3d 769.


text:
    No. 11-6744.
    Philip D. Rossi, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1019, 132 S. Ct. 563,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 406,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8024.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 422 Fed. Appx. 425.


text:
    No. 11-6748.
    Shawn Gardner, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1019, 132 S. Ct. 563,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 406,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 7995.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 435 Fed. Appx. 174.


text:
    No. 11-6749.
    James Samuel Peeples, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1019, 132 S. Ct. 563,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 406,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8052.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 422 Fed. Appx. 786.


text:
    No. 11-6750.
    Anthony Robert Stokes, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1019, 132 S. Ct. 564,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 406,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 7949.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 437 Fed. Appx. 225.


text:
    No. 11-6751.
    Mario Meschino, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1019, 132 S. Ct. 564,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 406,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8010.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 643 F.3d 1025.


text:
    No. 11-6753.
    Jamaine Mingo, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1019, 132 S. Ct. 564,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 407,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8006.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 395 Fed. Appx. 723.


text:
    No. 11-6755.
    Willie Dancy, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1020, 132 S. Ct. 564,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 407,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8072.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.

Same case below, 640 F.3d 455.


text:
    No. 11-6756.
    Fabian Hernandez, Petitioner v. Arizona.
    565 U.S. 1020, 132 S. Ct. 564,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 407,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8026.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division Two, denied.


text:
    No. 11-6757.
    Eugene Shaner Pennie-graft, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1020, 132 S. Ct. 564,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 407,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8016.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 641 F.3d 566.


text:
    No. 11-6759.
    Eric Hayes, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1020, 132 S. Ct. 565,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 407,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8032.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 434 Fed. Appx. 94.


text:
    No. 11-6760.
    Ruben Flores-Olmos, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1020, 132 S. Ct. 565,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 407,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 7966.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 438 Fed. Appx. 713.


text:
    No. 11-6761.
    Franklin Goodwin, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1020, 132 S. Ct. 565,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 407,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 7940.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 433 Fed. Appx. 636.


text:
    No. 11-6764.
    Juan Rivas-Moreiera, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1020, 132 S. Ct. 565,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 407,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 7976.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.

Same case below, 17 A.3d 1196.


text:
    No. 11-6767.
    Mark Russell Psick, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1020, 132 S. Ct. 565,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 408,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8003.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 434 Fed. Appx. 646.


text:
    No. 11-6772.
    Thomas Guy Caraway, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1020, 132 S. Ct. 565,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 408,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 7948.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 417 Fed. Appx. 828.


text:
    No. 11-6777.
    DeWayne Carter, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1020, 132 S. Ct. 566,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 408,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8001.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-6780.
    Albert Burnett, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1020, 132 S. Ct. 566,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 408,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8074.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 641 F.3d 894.


text:
    No. 11-6784.
    Alvaro Murillo, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1020, 132 S. Ct. 566,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 408,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8040.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 442 Fed. Appx. 277.


text:
    No. 11-6789.
    Juan Luis Ramon-Moreno, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1020, 132 S. Ct. 566,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 408,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8075.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-6790.
    Antonio Sanchez-Jaimes, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1020, 132 S. Ct. 567,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 408,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8038.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 432 Fed. Appx. 348.


text:
    No. 11-6791.
    Antonio Moscol, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1020, 132 S. Ct. 567,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 408,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 7974.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-6792.
    Edgar Cruz, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1020, 132 S. Ct. 567,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 409,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 7945.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 432 Fed. Appx. 354.


text:
    No. 11-6793.
    Isaac Marion, Sr., Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1021, 132 S. Ct. 567,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 409,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 7980.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 418 Fed. Appx. 847.


text:
    No. 11-6797.
    Wilbert Bubba Smith, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1021, 132 S. Ct. 567,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 409,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8046.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-6802.
    Bruno Joseph Mancari, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1021, 132 S. Ct. 567,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 409,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 7936.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-6810.
    Martay Love, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1021, 132 S. Ct. 568,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 409,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8060.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-6816.
    Adrian Perez-Sanchez, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1021, 132 S. Ct. 568,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 409,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 7939.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 439 Fed. Appx. 247.


text:
    No. 11-6817.
    Roque Medina-Ortiz, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1021, 132 S. Ct. 568,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 409,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8023.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-6818.
    Lavell Bone, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1021, 132 S. Ct. 568,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 409,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8012.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 433 Fed. Appx. 831.


text:
    No. 11-6821.
    Michael Doughty Williams, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1021, 132 S. Ct. 568,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 409,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8056.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 439 Fed. Appx. 254.


text:
    No. 11-6822.
    Transito Villegas-Valdez, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1021, 132 S. Ct. 568,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 410,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8047.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 429 Fed. Appx. 427.


text:
    No. 11-6824.
    James J. McAndrew, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1021, 132 S. Ct. 569,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 410,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 7944.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-6877.
    Grady Hudson, Petitioner v. Gerald M. Lorence.
    565 U.S. 1021, 132 S. Ct. 569,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 410,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 7984.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.


text:
    No. 10-1477.
    Jack L. Hargrove, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1021, 132 S. Ct. 548,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 410,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 7957.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 412 Fed. Appx. 869.


text:
    No. 11-143.
    Pilgrim Films & Television, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Larry Montz, et al.
    565 U.S. 1021, 132 S. Ct. 550,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 410,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 7979.
    November 7, 2011.
   Motion of Reveille LLC, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Motion of California Broadcasters Association, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 649 F.3d 975.


text:
    No. 11-287.
    Skechers U.S.A., Inc., Petitioner v. Patty Tomlinson.
    565 U.S. 1021, 132 S. Ct. 551,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 410,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8029.
    November 7, 2011.
   Motion of Center for Class Action Fairness for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-5113.
    Marcus Deangelo Jones, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1022, 132 S. Ct. 549,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 410,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8061.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 11-6165.
    Monte L. Haney, Petitioner v. Derral G. Adams, Warden.
    565 U.S. 1022, 132 S. Ct. 551,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 411,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 7977,
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 641 F.3d 1168.


text:
    No. 11-6206.
    Timothy J. Osborne, Petitioner v. Conan O’Brien.
    565 U.S. 1022, 132 S. Ct. 553,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 411,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8069.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 11-6261.
    Eric Flores, Petitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General, et al.
    565 U.S. 1022, 132 S. Ct. 554,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 411,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 7964.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari before judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.


author: Justice Alito, Justice Sotomayor,

text:
    No. 11-6391.
    Duane Edward Buck, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.
    565 U.S. 1022, 132 S. Ct. 32,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 411,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 7925,
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 452 Fed. Appx. 423.

Statement of

Justice Alito,

with whom

Justice Scalia and Justice Breyer join,

respecting the denial of certiorari.

One morning in July 1995, petitioner Duane E. Buck went to his ex-girlfriend’s house with a rifle and a shotgun. After killing one person and wounding another, Buck chased his ex-girlfriend outside. Her children followed and witnessed Buck shoot and kill their mother as she attempted to flee. An arresting officer testified that Buck was laughing when he was arrested and said “ [t]he bitch deserved what she got.” 28 Tr. 51 (May 6, 1997).

Buck was tried for capital murder, and a jury convicted. He was sentenced to death based on the jury’s finding that the State had proved Buck’s future dangerousness to society.

The petition in this case concerns bizarre and objectionable testimony given by a “defense expert” at the penalty phase of Buck’s capital trial. The witness, Dr. Walter Quijano, testified that petitioner, if given a noncapital sentence, would not present a danger to society. But Dr. Qui-jano added that members of petitioner’s race (he is African-American) are statistically more likely than the average person to engage in crime.

Dr. Quijano’s testimony would provide a basis for reversal of petitioner’s sentence if the prosecution were responsible for presenting that testimony to the jury. But Dr. Quijano was a defense witness, and it was petitioner’s attorney, not the prosecutor, who first elicited Dr. Quijano’s view regarding the correlation between race and future dangerousness. Retained by the defense, Dr. Quijano prepared a report in which he opined on this subject. His report stated:

“Future Dangerousness, Whether there is probability that the defendant would commit criminal acts of violence that would constitute a continuing threat to society? The following factors were considered in answer to the question of future dangerousness: statistical, environmental, and clinical judgment.

“I. STATISTICAL FACTORS
“1. Past crimes. . . .
“2. Age-
“3. Sex. . . .
“4. Race. Black: Increased probability. There is an over-representation of Blacks among the violent offenders.
“5. Socioeconomics. . . .
“6. Employment stability. . . .
“7. Substance abuse. . . .” Defense Exh. 1 in No. 699684 (208th Jud. Dist., Harris Cty., Tex.), p. 7.

The defense then called Dr. Quijano to the stand, and elicited his testimony on this point. Defense counsel asked Dr. Qui-jano, “[i]f we have an inmate such as Mr. Buck who is sentenced to life in prison, what are some of the factors, statistical factors or environmental factors that you’ve looked at in regard to this case?” 28 Tr. 110 (May 6, 1997). As he had done in his report, Dr. Quijano identified past crimes, age, sex, race, socioeconomic status, and substance abuse as statistical factors predictive of “whether a person will or will not constitute a continuing danger.” Id,., at 111; see also id., at 110 (identifying the “statistical factors we know to predict future dangerousness”). With respect to race, he elaborated further that “[fit’s a sad commentary that minorities, Hispanics and black people, are over represented in the Criminal Justice System.” Id., at 111. Not only did the defense present this testimony to the jury but Dr. Quijano’s report was also admitted into evidence—over the prosecution’s objection—and was thus available for the jury to consider. See id., at 233-234.

It is true that the prosecutor briefly went over this same ground on cross-examination. The prosecutor asked a single question regarding whether race increased the probability that Buck would pose a future danger to society:

“Q. You have determined that the sex factor, that a male is more violent than a female because that’s just the way it is, and that the race factor, black, increases the future dangerousness for various complicated reasons; is that correct?
“A. Yes.” Id., at 160.

But this colloquy did not go beyond what defense counsel had already elicited on direct examination, and by this point, Dr. Quijano’s views on the correlation between race and future dangerousness had already been brought to the jury’s attention. Moreover, the prosecutor did not revisit the race-related testimony in closing or ask the jury to find future dangerousness based on Buck’s race.

The dissent makes much of the fact that the State at various points in federal ha-beas proceedings was inaccurate in its attempts to explain why the present case is different from the others in which, as a result of similar testimony by Dr. Quijano, the State did not assert procedural default and new sentencing proceedings were held. But the fact remains that the present case is different from all the rest. In four of the six other cases, see, e.g., Saldano v. Texas, 530 U.S. 1212, 120 S. Ct. 2214, 147 L. Ed. 2d 246 (2000), the prosecution called Dr. Quijano and elicited the objectionable testimony on direct examination. In the remaining two cases, see Alba v. Johnson, 232 F.3d 208 (CA5 2000) (Table); Blue v. Johnson, Civ. Action No. 99-0350 (SD Tex., Sept. 29, 2000), while the defense called Dr. Quijano, the objectionable testimony was not elicited until the prosecution questioned Dr. Quijano on cross-examination. See Record, Doc. 511601677, pp. 44-49; id., Doc. 511601676, at 39-44. And, on redirect, defense counsel mentioned race only to mitigate the effect on the jury of Dr. Quijano’s prior identification of race as an immutable factor increasing a defendant’s likelihood of future dangerousness. Only in Buck’s case did defense counsel elicit the race-related testimony on direct examination. Thus, this is the only case in which it can be said that the responsibility for eliciting the offensive testimony lay squarely with the defense.

Although the dissent suggests that the District Court may have been misled by the State’s inaccurate statements, the District Court, in denying petitioner’s motion under Rule 60 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, was fully aware of what had occurred in all of these cases. It is for these reasons that I conclude that certio-rari should be denied.

Justice Sotomayor,

with whom Justice Kagan joins,

dissenting.

Today the Court denies review of a death sentence marred by racial overtones and a record compromised by misleading remarks and omissions made by the State of Texas in the federal habeas proceedings below. Because our criminal justice system should not tolerate either circumstance—especially in a capital case—I dissent and vote to grant the petition.

Duane E. Buck was convicted of capital murder in a Texas state court. During the penalty phase of Buck’s trial, the defense called psychologist Walter Quijano as a witness. The defense sought Quijano’s opinion as to whether Buck would pose a continuing threat to society—a fact that the jury was required to find in order to sentence Buck to death. Quijano testified that there were several “statistical factors we know to predict future dangerousness,” and listed a defendant’s past crimes, age, sex, race, socioeconomic status, employment stability, and substance abuse history. 28 Tr. 110-111 (May 6, 1997). As to race, Quijano said: “Race. It’s a sad commentary that minorities, Hispanics and black people, are over represented in the Criminal Justice System.” Id,., at 111. The defense then asked Qui-jano to “talk about environmental factors if [Buck were] incarcerated in prison.” Id., at 111-112. Quijano explained that, for example, Buck “has no assaultive incidents either at TDC or in jail,” and that “that’s a good sign that this person is controllable within a jail or prison setting.” Id., at 115. He also explained that Buck’s “victim [was] not random” because “there [was] a preexisting relationship,” and that this reduced the probability that Buck would pose a future danger. Id., at 112. Ultimately, when the defense asked Quijano whether Buck was likely to commit violent criminal acts if he were sentenced to life imprisonment, Quijano replied, “The probability of that happening in prison would be low.” Id,., at 115. The defense also offered into evidence, over the prosecutor’s objection, a report containing Quijano’s psychological evaluation of Buck, which substantially mirrored Quijano’s trial testimony.

On cross-examination, the prosecutor began by asking Quijano about the financial compensation he received in return for his time and the methods he used to examine Buck. The prosecutor then said that she would “like to ask [Quijano] some questions from [his] report.” Id., at 155. After inquiring about the statistical factors of past crimes and age and how they might indicate future dangerousness in Buck’s case, the prosecutor said: “You have determined that the sex factor, that a male is more violent than a female because that’s just the way it is, and that the race factor, black, increases the future dangerousness for various complicated reasons; is that correct?” Id., at 160. Qui-jano answered, ‘Yes.” Ibid. After additional cross-examination and testimony from a subsequent witness, the prosecutor argued to the jury in summation that Quijano “told you that there was a probability that [Buck] would commit future acts of violence.” Id., at 260. The jury returned a verdict of death.

This was not the first time that Quijano had testified in a Texas capital case, or in which the prosecution asked him questions regarding the relationship between race and future dangerousness. State prosecutors had elicited comparable testimony from Quijano in several other cases. In four of them, the prosecution called Quijano as a witness. See Gonzales v. Cockrell, Civ. Action No. 99-72 (WD Tex., Dec. 19, 2002); Broxton v. Johnson, Civ. Action No. 00-1034, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25715 (SD Tex., Mar. 28, 2001); Garcia v. Johnson, Civ. Action No. 99-134 (ED Tex., Sept. 7, 2000); Saldano v. Texas, 530 U.S. 1212, 120 S. Ct. 2214, 147 L. Ed. 2d 246 (2000). In two, the defense called Quijano, but the prosecution was the first to elicit race-related testimony from him. See Alba v. Johnson, 232 F.3d 208 (CA5 2000) (Table); Blue v. Johnson, Civ. Action No. 99-0350 (SD Tex., Sept. 29, 2000). In each case, as in Buck’s, however, the salient fact was that the prosecution invited the jury to consider race as a factor in sentencing. And in each case, the defendant was sentenced to death.

When one of those defendants, Victor Hugo Saldano, petitioned for this Court’s review, the State of Texas confessed error. It acknowledged that “the use of race in Saldano’s sentencing seriously undermined the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of the judicial process.” Response to Pet. for Cert, in Saldano v. Texas, O. T. 1999, No. 99-8119, p. 7. The State continued, “[T]he infusion of race as a factor for the jury to weigh in making its determination violated [Saldano’s] constitutional right to be sentenced without regard to the color of his skin.” Id., at 8. We granted Saldano’s petition, vacated the judgment, and remanded. Saldano v. Texas, 530 U.S. 1212, 120 S. Ct. 2214, 147 L. Ed. 2d 246.

Shortly afterwards, the then-attorney general of Texas announced publicly that he had identified six cases that were “similar to that of Victor Hugo Saldano” in that “testimony was offered by Dr. Qui-jano that race should be a factor for the jury to consider” in making its sentencing determination. Record in No. 4:04-cv-03965 (SD Tex.), Doc. 27-5, p. 30 (hereinafter Record) (internal quotation marks omitted). These were the five cases listed above (besides Saldano), as well as Buck’s. The attorney general declared that “it is inappropriate to allow race to be considered as a factor in our criminal justice system.” Record, Doc. 27-5, at 30 (internal quotation marks omitted). Accordingly, in five of the six cases the attorney general identified, the State confessed error and did not raise procedural defenses to the defendants’ federal habeas petitions. Five of the six defendants were thus resentenced, each to death.

Only in Buck’s case, the last of the six cases to reach federal habeas review, did the State assert a procedural bar. Why the State chose to treat Buck differently from each of the other defendants has not always been clear. As the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recognized in the decision that is the subject of this petition, “We are provided with no explanation for why the State declined to act consistently with its Attorney General’s public announcement with respect to petitioner Buck.” No. 11-70025, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 19132, 2011 WL 4067164, *8, n. 41 (Sept. 14, 2011).

What we do know is that the State justified its assertion of a procedural defense in the District Court based on statements and omissions that were misleading. The State found itself “compelled” to treat Buck’s case differently from Salda-no’s because of a “critical distinction”: “Buck himself, not the State!,] offered Dr. Quijano’s testimony into evidence.” Record, Doc. 6, at 17. The State created the unmistakable impression that Buck’s case differed from the others in that only Buck called Quijano as a witness. The State asserted, “[T]he Director is obviously aware of the prior confessions of error in other federal habeas corpus cases involving similar testimony by Dr. Quijano. However, this case is not Saldano. In Saldano’s case Dr. Quijano testified for the State.” Id., at 20 (citation omitted; emphasis in original); see also ibid. (“Therefore, because it was Buck who called Dr. Qui-jano to testify and derived the benefit of Dr. Quijano’s overall opinion that Buck was unlikely to be a future danger despite the existence of some negative factors, this case does not represent the odious error contained in the Saldano cases”). This was obviously not accurate. Like Buck, the defendants in both Blue and Alba called Quijano to the stand. But on the ground that only Buck had called Quijano as a witness, the State urged the District Court that “the former actions of the Director [in the other five cases] are not applicable and should not be considered in deciding this case.” Record, Doc. 6, at 20. The District Court applied the procedural bar raised by the State and dismissed Buck’s petition.

Buck later brought the State’s misstatements to light in a motion to reopen the judgment under Rule 60 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In response, the State erroneously identified Alba as a case in which the prosecution had called Qui-jano to the stand, and omitted any mention of Blue. After the District Court denied Buck’s Rule 60 motion, Buck highlighted these errors in a motion under Rule 59(e) to alter or amend the judgment, which the District Court also denied. The Fifth Circuit denied Buck’s application for a certificate of appealability (COA) to review these two judgments.

I believe the Fifth Circuit erred in doing so. To obtain a COA, a petitioner need not “prove, before the issuance of a COA, that some jurists would grant the petition for habeas corpus.” Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 338, 123 S. Ct. 1029, 154 L. Ed. 2d 931 (2003). Instead, a petitioner must show that “jurists of reason could disagree with the district court’s resolution of his constitutional claims or that jurists could conclude the issues presented are adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further.” Id,., at 327, 123 S. Ct. 1029, 154 L. Ed. 2d 931. See also 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).

Buck has met this standard. The Rule 60 relief that he sought in the District Court was highly discretionary. Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp., 486 U.S. 847, 108 S. Ct. 2194, 100 L. Ed. 2d 855 (1988). Yet the District Court denied relief based on a record compromised by the State’s misleading remarks and omissions. I realize that, in denying Buck’s Rule 59(e) motion, the District Court was aware of Buck’s arguments that the State had mischaracterized Alba and Blue. But the District Court lacked other information that might have influenced its decision. Significantly, the District Court could not know that the State would later concede in the Fifth Circuit that it had mischaracterized Alba.

Nor, for similar reasons, did the District Court have the opportunity to evaluate the State’s subsequent efforts in the Fifth Circuit and this Court to try to distinguish Buck’s case from Alba and Blue. The State argues that although the defendants in those cases each proffered Quijano as a witness, they did not, like Buck, elicit race-related testimony on direct examination; instead, the prosecution first did so on cross-examination.

This distinction is accurate but not necessarily substantial. The context in which Buck’s counsel addressed race differed markedly from how the prosecutor used it. On direct examination, Quijano referred to race as part of his overall opinion that Buck would pose a low threat to society were he imprisoned. This is exactly how the State has characterized Quijano’s testimony. E.g., Thaler’s Reply to Buck’s Motion for Relief From Judgment and Motion for Stay of Execution in No. 4:04-cv-03965 (SD Tex.), Doc. 30, pp. 15-16 (“In this case, first on direct examination by the defense, Dr. Quijano merely identified race as one statistical factor and pointed out that African-Americans were overrepresented in the criminal justice system; he did not state a causal relationship, nor did he link this statistic to Buck as an individual”). Buck did not argue that his race made him less dangerous, and the prosecutor had no need to revisit the issue. But she did, in a question specifically designed to persuade the jury that Buck’s race made him inore dangerous and that, in part on this basis, he should be sentenced to death.

The then-attorney general of Texas recognized that “it is inappropriate to allow race to be considered as a factor in our criminal justice system.” Record, Doc. 27-5, at 30 (internal quotation marks omitted). Whether the District Court would accord any weight to the State’s purported distinctions between Buck’s case and the others is a question which that court should decide in the first instance, based on an unobscured record. Especially in light of the capital nature of this case and the express recognition by a Texas attorney general that the relevant testimony was inappropriately race charged, Buck has presented issues that “deserve encouragement to proceed further.” Miller-El, 537 U.S., at 327, 123 S. Ct. 1029, 154 L. Ed. 2d 931.

       On redirect in Alba, defense counsel tried to downplay the significance of Dr. Quijano’s testimony with respect to the statistical factors:
      “Q. [The prosecutor] asked you about statistical factors in predicting future dangerousness. When we’re talking about statistics, are we talking about correlation or causation?
      “A. Oh. These statistics are strictly correlation. There’s a big distinction, and we must keep that in mind. Correlation simply says that two events happened—coincidentally happened at the same time. It does not mean that one causes the other.
      “Q. So when we’re talking about these statistical factors—that more men re-offend than women, Hispanics offend more than blacks or whites, people from the low socioeconomic groups offend more than people from the higher socioeconomic groups, people who have opiate addiction or alcohol abuse offend more often than those who don’t, people who have less education offend more often than those who have—do all those things cause people to offend?
      “A. No. They are simply contributing factors. They are not causal factors. One cannot control one’s gender or one’s color. And obviously there are many, many Hispanics, many whites, many Orientals who don’t commit crimes. But the frequence [sic] among those who commit crimes, these are the characteristics. They don’t cause each other; they just happen to be coincidental to each other.” Record, Doc. 511601677, at 104-105 (one paragraph break omitted).
      See also id., Doc. 511601676, at 82-84 (seeking to show that incarceration could decrease a defendant’s likelihood of future dangerousness, notwithstanding the immutable factors, such as race); id., at 82-83 (“If the person is put in a prison many of these factors will not be operative anymore because the prison restriction will not allow those factors to be present, and so the more of those factors are controlled by the prison structure, the less the danger—the less dangerous the person is in the prison”).

      . The report listed the following statistical factors relevant to the question whether Buck would pose a continuing threat to society: past crimes, age, sex, race, socioeconomics, employment stability, and substance abuse. As to race, the report stated: “4. Race. Black: Increased probability. There is an over-representation of Blacks among the violent offenders.” Defense Exh. 1 in No. 699684 (208th Jud. Dist., Harris Cty., Tex.), p. 7.

      . Perhaps, under a generous reading of the State’s briefing, the State meant to convey to the District Court that Buck’s case was distinguishable from the others not only because he called Quijano as a witness, but also because he elicited race-related testimony. But that is not what the briefing says. The distinction that the State offered—that Buck alone proffered Quijano as a witness—is incorrect.


text:
    No. 11-6692.
    Kenneth D. Beverly, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1030, 132 S. Ct. 561,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 416,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8004,
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 430 Fed. Appx. 218.


text:
    No. 11-6725.
    Raymond Serrano, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1030, 132 S. Ct. 562,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 416,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 7956.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 411 Fed. Appx. 253.


text:
    No. 11-6727.
    Richard Morales, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1031, 132 S. Ct. 562,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 417,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8068.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied. Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 635 F.3d 39.


text:
    No. 11-443.
    In re Andrew J. Johnson, Petitioner.
    565 U.S. 1012, 132 S. Ct. 566,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 417,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 7965.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.


text:
    No. 11-6758.
    In re Neville Porras, Petitioner.
    565 U.S. 1012, 132 S. Ct. 565,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 417,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8045.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.


text:
    No. 11-6807.
    In re Naricco Scott, Petitioner.
    565 U.S. 1013, 132 S. Ct. 568,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 417,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8030.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.


text:
    No. 11-6889.
    In re Baljit Singh, Petitioner.
    565 U.S. 1013, 132 S. Ct. 569,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 417,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8034,
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.


text:
    No. 11-6917.
    In re Leonard Walker, Petitioner.
    565 U.S. 1013, 132 S. Ct. 569,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 417,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8051.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.


text:
    No. 11-6183.
    In re Samuel Rivera, Petitioner.
    565 U.S. 1013, 132 S. Ct. 552,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 417,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 7971,
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for writ of mandamus denied.


text:
    No. 10-1508.
    Azam Ansari, Petitioner v. NCS Pearson, Inc., dba Pearson VUE, et al.
    565 U.S. 1031, 132 S. Ct. 572,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 417,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8048.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 825, 132 S. Ct. 116, 181 L. Ed. 2d 40, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 5298.


text:
    No. 11-5473.
    Douglas E. Kampfer, Petitioner v. Wendy Reu, et al.
    565 U.S. 1031, 132 S. Ct. 572,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 417,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8039.
    November 7, 2011.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 909, 132 S. Ct. 317, 181 L. Ed. 2d 195, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 5976.


text:
    No. 11-547 (R46-003).
    HCP, Inc., fka Health Care Property Investors, Inc., Petitioner v. Ventas, Inc.
    565 U.S. 1031, 132 S. Ct. 572,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 418,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8079.
    November 9, 2011.
   The petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in the above-entitled case was dismissed today pursuant to Rule 46.1 of the rules of this Court.

Same case below, 647 F.3d 291.


text:
    No. 11A446 (11-6718).
    Anthony B. Juniper, Petitioner v. Loretta K. Kelly, Warden.
    565 U.S. 1031, 132 S. Ct. 572,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 418,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8078.
    November 9, 2011.
   Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to The Chief Justice, and by him referred to the Court, denied.

Same case below, 281 Va. 277, 707 S.E.2d 290.


text:
    No. 10-851.
    Clarice Stovall, Warden, Petitioner v. Sharee Miller.
    565 U.S. 1031, 132 S. Ct. 573,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 418,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8213.
    November 14, 2011.
   On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for further consideration in light of Greene v. Fisher, 565 U.S. 34, 132 S. Ct. 38, 181 L. Ed. 2d 336 (2011).

Same case below, 608 F.3d 913.


text:
    No. 11-305.
    Scott McEwen, Warden, Petitioner v. Antwion E. Thompson.
    565 U.S. 1032, 132 S. Ct. 578,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 418,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8243.
    November 14, 2011.
   On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of cer-tiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Greene v. Fisher, 565 U.S. 34, 132 S. Ct. 82, 181 L. Ed. 2d 336 (2011).

Same case below, 657 F.3d 784.


text:
    No. 11-282.
    Branch Banking and Trust, Petitioner v. Faith Gordon.
    565 U.S. 1031, 132 S. Ct. 577,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 418,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8155.
    November 14, 2011.
   On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333, 131 S. Ct. 1740, 179 L. Ed. 2d 742 (2011).

Same case below, 419 Fed. Appx. 920.


text:
    No. 11A374.
    Charles Turner Haber-mann, Applicant v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1032, 132 S. Ct. 602,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 419,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8148.
    November 14, 2011.
   Application for bail, addressed to Justice Ginsburg, and referred to the Court, denied.


text:
    No. 11M43.
    Paul A. Slough, Evan S. Liberty, Dustin L. Heard, and Donald W. Ball, Petitioners v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1032, 132 S. Ct. 603,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 419,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8241.
    November 14, 2011.
   Motion for leave to file a petition for writ of certiorari under seal with redacted copies for the public record granted.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.

Same case below, 395 U.S. App. D.C. 178, 641 F.3d 544.


text:
    No. 11M44.
    Travis Loren Dally, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1032, 132 S. Ct. 603,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 419,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8174.
    November 14, 2011.
   Motion for leave to file a petition for writ of certiorari under seal with redacted copies for the public record granted.


text:
    No. 10-704.
    Curt Messerschmidt, et al., Petitioners v. Augusta Millender, et al.
    565 U.S. 1032, 132 S. Ct. 603,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 419,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8117.
    November 14, 2011.
   Motion of respondents and Brenda Millender, as Executor of the Estate of Augusta Millender, for substitution as respondent in place of Augusta Millender, deceased, granted.


text:
    No. 11-6335.
    Daniel B., Petitioner v. Sunapee School District.
    565 U.S. 1032, 132 S. Ct. 603,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 419,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8244.
    November 14, 2011.
   Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pau-peris denied. Petitioner is allowed until December 5, 2011, within which to pay the docketing fees required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.

Same case below, 162 N.H. 38, 27 A.3d 689.


text:
    No. 11-6728.
    Francis Leroy McLain, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1032, 132 S. Ct. 603,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 419,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8185.
    November 14, 2011.
   Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pau-peris denied. Petitioner is allowed until December 5, 2011, within which to pay the docketing fees required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.

Same case below, 646 F.3d 599.


text:
    No. 11-159.
    Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security, Petitioner v. Karen K. Capato, on Behalf of B. N. C., et al.
    565 U.S. 1033, 132 S. Ct. 576,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 419,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8245.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit granted.

Same case below, 631 F.3d 626.


text:
    No. 11-161.
    Christine Armour, et al., Petitioners v. City of Indianapolis, Indiana, et al.
    565 U.S. 1033, 132 S. Ct. 576,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 420,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8180.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Indiana granted.

Same case below, 946 N.E.2d 553.


text:
    No. 11-393.
    National Federation of Independent Business, et al., Petitioners v. Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al. Florida, et al., Petitioners v. Department of Health and Human Services, et al.
    No. 11-400.
    565 U.S. 1033, 132 S. Ct. 603,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 420,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8269.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in No. 11-393, granted. Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in No. 11-400 granted, limited to the issue of severability presented by Question 3 of the petition. The cases are consolidated and a total of 90 minutes is allotted for oral argument.

Same cases below, 648 F.3d 1235.


text:
    No. 11-398.
    Department of Health and Human Services, et al., Petitioners v. Florida, et al.
    565 U.S. 1034, 132 S. Ct. 604,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 420,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8094.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted. In addition to Question 1 presented by the petition, the parties are directed to brief and argue the following question: “Whether the suit brought by respondents to challenge the minimum coverage provision of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, 26 U.S.C. § 5000A, is barred by the Anti-Injunction Act, 26 U.S.C. § 7421(a).” A total of two hours is allotted for oral argument on Question 1. One hour is allotted for oral argument on the additional question.

Same case below, 648 F.3d 1235.


text:
    No. 11-400.
    Florida, et al., Petitioners v. Department of Health and Human Services, et al.
    565 U.S. 1033, 132 S. Ct. 604,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 420,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8225.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.

Same case below, 648 F.3d 1235.


text:
    No. 10-1285.
    Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., Petitioner v. Francisco Rodriguez, et ux.
    565 U.S. 1034, 132 S. Ct. 573,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 420,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8261.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 629 F.3d 136.


text:
    No. 10-10217.
    Janet B. Cunningham, Petitioner v. Jack V. Kelley, et ux.
    565 U.S. 1034, 132 S. Ct. 573,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 420,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8157.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, denied.

Same case below, 53 So. 3d 1034.


text:
    No. 10-10731.
    Jose Del Carmen Cardales-Luna, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1034, 132 S. Ct. 573,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 421,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8132.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.

Same case below, 632 F.3d 731.


text:
    No. 10-10777.
    Ricardo Alvarez-Cordova, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1034, 132 S. Ct. 574,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 421,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8237.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 409 Fed. Appx. 994.


text:
    No. 10-10838.
    Hector Rolando Medina, Petitioner v. Texas.
    565 U.S. 1034, 132 S. Ct. 573,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 421,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8210.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.


text:
    No. 10-10842.
    Tyrone D. Williams, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1034, 132 S. Ct. 573,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 421,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8242.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 416 Fed. Appx. 130.


text:
    No. 10-11210.
    Colin Nathanson, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1034, 132 S. Ct. 574,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 421,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8152.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 406 Fed. Appx. 162.


text:
    No. 10-11225.
    Edward James Tinsley, Petitioner v. Harold W. Clarke, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.
    565 U.S. 1034, 132 S. Ct. 574,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 421,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8287.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 407 Fed. Appx. 711.


text:
    No. 11-57.
    Harper Excavating, Inc., Petitioner v. Jeffrey Hansen.
    565 U.S. 1035, 132 S. Ct. 574,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 421,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8247.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 641 F.3d 1216.


text:
    No. 11-169.
    Tennessee ex rel. Arlie Watson, et al., Petitioners v. Larry Waters, et al.
    565 U.S. 1035, 132 S. Ct. 576,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 421,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8187.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Eastern Division, denied.


text:
    No. 11-252.
    Lee Investment LLC, dba The Island, Petitioner v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, et al.
    565 U.S. 1035, 132 S. Ct. 577,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 422,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8202.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 641 F.3d 1126.


text:
    No. 11-295.
    Harold Lee Harvey, Jr., Petitioner v. Barry Reddish, Warden, et al.
    565 U.S. 1035, 132 S. Ct. 577,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 422,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8229.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 629 F.3d 1228.


text:
    No. 11-298.
    Rosemarie Clampitt, Petitioner v. James P. Geurin, et ux.
    565 U.S. 1035, 132 S. Ct. 578,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 422,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8137,
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arkansas denied.

Same case below, 2010 Ark. App. 558.


text:
    No. 11-300.
    Michael David Sebba, Petitioner v. Linda Littleton.
    565 U.S. 1035, 132 S. Ct. 578,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 422,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8092.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One, denied.


text:
    No. 11-304.
    Peter A. Crawford, Petitioner v. Wolverine, Proctor & Schwartz, Inc., et al.
    565 U.S. 1035, 132 S. Ct. 578,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 422,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8136,
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-312.
    Gailon A. Joy and Robert Pickle, Petitioners v. Three Angels Broadcasting Network, Inc., et al.
    565 U.S. 1035, 132 S. Ct. 580,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 422,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8227.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-313.
    Tuan Anh Do, Petitioner v. Phuong Due Dang, et al.
    565 U.S. 1035, 132 S. Ct. 581,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 422,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8286.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District, denied.


text:
    No. 11-314.
    Kim A. Bodnar, Petitioner v. James J. Lestitian.
    565 U.S. 1035, 132 S. Ct. 581,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 422,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8170.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh Office, denied.

Same case below, 998 A.2d 1020.


text:
    No. 11-315.
    Mahmood Yoonessi, Petitioner v. Randy Ratajczak, et al.
    565 U.S. 1035, 132 S. Ct. 581,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 423,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8188,
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New York denied.

Same case below, 15 N.Y.3d 913, 913 N.Y.S.2d 126, 939 N.E.2d 144.


text:
    No. 11-322.
    Cheryl Gray and Gregory Gray, Petitioners v. Corona Construction, et al.
    565 U.S. 1035, 132 S. Ct. 583,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 423,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8150.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.


text:
    No. 11-324.
    Johanna Ong, Petitioner v. New Jersey.
    565 U.S. 1035, 132 S. Ct. 584,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 423,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8203.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division denied.


text:
    No. 11-327.
    Malcolm McFall Babb, Petitioner v. James B. Angelí.
    565 U.S. 1035, 132 S. Ct. 584,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 423,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8099.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 423 Fed. Appx. 349.


text:
    No. 11-344.
    Cristobal Calix, Petitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General.
    565 U.S. 1035, 132 S. Ct. 588,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 423,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8232.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 423 Fed. Appx. 240.


text:
    No. 11-356.
    Lufkin Industries, Inc., Petitioner v. Sylvester McClain, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, et al.
    565 U.S. 1036, 132 S. Ct. 589,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 423,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8265.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 649 F.3d 374.


text:
    No. 11-365.
    Svetlana Karpeeva, et al., Petitioners v. Department of Homeland Security Citizenship and Immigration Services, et al.
    565 U.S. 1036, 132 S. Ct. 590,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 423,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8190.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 432 Fed. Appx. 919.


text:
    No. 11-367.
    Donald Davidson, Petitioner v. P. L. Vasquez, Warden.
    565 U.S. 1036, 132 S. Ct. 589,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 423,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8141.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 431 Fed. Appx. 607.


text:
    No. 11-368.
    Torina A. Collis, Petitioner v. Bank of America, N.A.
    565 U.S. 1036, 132 S. Ct. 589,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 424,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8163.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 426 Fed. Appx. 195.


text:
    No. 11-380.
    Jennifer Workman, Petitioner v. Mingo County Board of Education.
    565 U.S. 1036, 132 S. Ct. 590,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 424,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8260.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 419 Fed. Appx. 348.


text:
    No. 11-384.
    Silgan Containers Corporation, Petitioner v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
    565 U.S. 1036, 132 S. Ct. 602,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 424,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8223.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 434 Fed. Appx. 709.


text:
    No. 11-402.
    Victory Through Jesus Sports Ministry Foundation, Petitioner v. Lee’s Summit R-7 School District, et al.
    565 U.S. 1036, 132 S. Ct. 592,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 424,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8209.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 640 F.3d 329.


text:
    No. 11-447.
    Dana Holland, Petitioner v. City of Chicago, Illinois, et al.
    565 U.S. 1036, 132 S. Ct. 593,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 424,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8224.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 643 F.3d 248.


text:
    No. 11-486.
    Louis Daidone, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1036, 132 S. Ct. 598,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 424,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8226.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 422 Fed. Appx. 26.


text:
    No. 11-5073.
    Edward F. Kinane, et al., Petitioners v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1036, 132 S. Ct. 574,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 424,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8285.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.

Same case below, 12 A.3d 23.


text:
    No. 11-5174.
    Billy Ray Irick, Petitioner v. Ricky J. Bell, Warden.
    565 U.S. 1036, 132 S. Ct. 575,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 424,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8089.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 636 F.3d 289.


text:
    No. 11-5325.
    Lishon Marcelle Hudson, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1036, 132 S. Ct. 575,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 425,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8130.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 422 Fed. Appx. 343.


text:
    No. 11-5385.
    Robert Donald Maly, Petitioner v. Arizona.
    565 U.S. 1036, 132 S. Ct. 575,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 425,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8208.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division Two, denied.


text:
    No. 11-5417.
    Frank M. Bafford, Petitioner v. Midfirst Bank, et al.
    565 U.S. 1037, 132 S. Ct. 575,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 425,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8173,
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-5433.
    Van James Bond Tran, Petitioner v. Newport News Holding Corporation.
    565 U.S. 1037, 132 S. Ct. 575,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 425,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8196.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 650 F.3d 423.


text:
    No. 11-5664.
    Michael R. Ochoa, Petitioner v. Erin Rubin.
    565 U.S. 1037, 132 S. Ct. 575,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 425,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8249,
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh Office, denied.

Same case below, 15 A.3d 540.


text:
    No. 11-5687.
    Paul Alonzo Ewing, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1037, 132 S. Ct. 576,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 425,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8181.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 410 Fed. Appx. 611.


text:
    No. 11-5762.
    Lorenzo L. Winfield, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1037, 132 S. Ct. 576,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 425,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8199.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 418 Fed. Appx. 243.


text:
    No. 11-5798.
    Lorenzo Antonio Thomas, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1037, 132 S. Ct. 604,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 425,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8144.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-5799.
    Ernest Carl Darcus, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1037, 132 S. Ct. 576,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 426,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8204.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-5886.
    Horace Linton Brown, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1037, 132 S. Ct. 577,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 426,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8179.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 429 Fed. Appx. 351.


text:
    No. 11-6117.
    Samuel Villegas Lopez, Petitioner v. Charles L. Ryan, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections.
    565 U.S. 1037, 132 S. Ct. 577,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 426,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8095.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 630 F.3d 1198.


text:
    No. 11-6201.
    Roland Jiles, Petitioner v. Orleans Parish Prison Medical Clinic, et al.
    565 U.S. 1037, 132 S. Ct. 578,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 426,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8167.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 425 Fed. Appx. 367.


text:
    No. 11-6230.
    Thomas Wiggins, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.
    565 U.S. 1037, 132 S. Ct. 579,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 426,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8268.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 428 Fed. Appx. 468.


text:
    No. 11-6231.
    Joseph M. Williams, Petitioner v. City of Natchitoches, Louisiana, et al.
    565 U.S. 1037, 132 S. Ct. 579,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 426,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8228,
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-6232.
    Craig Williams, Petitioner v. Derral G. Adams, Warden.
    565 U.S. 1037, 132 S. Ct. 579,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 426,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8284.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 447 Fed. Appx. 829.


text:
    No. 11-6234.
    Gustavo Venta, Petitioner v. Kenneth S. Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.
    565 U.S. 1037, 132 S. Ct. 605,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 426,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8184.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-6245.
    David Wayne Poydras, Petitioner v. Kevin J. Martin, et al.
    565 U.S. 1038, 132 S. Ct. 579,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 427,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8149.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 437 Fed. Appx. 337.


text:
    No. 11-6246.
    Pamper Petterway, Petitioner v. New Jersey.
    565 U.S. 1038, 132 S. Ct. 579,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 427,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8096.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, denied.


text:
    No. 11-6247.
    Ahimaaz Ben Levi, Petitioner v. Illinois.
    565 U.S. 1038, 132 S. Ct. 580,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 427,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8151.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, Fifth District, denied.

Same case below, 404 Ill. App. 3d 1191, 374 Ill. Dec. 1086, 996 N.E.2d 781.


text:
    No. 11-6253.
    Kirk Wayne McBride, Sr., Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.
    565 U.S. 1038, 132 S. Ct. 580,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 427,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8134.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-6255.
    Jermaine S. Murphy, Petitioner v. Illinois.
    565 U.S. 1038, 132 S. Ct. 580,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 427,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8222.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, denied.

Same case below, 405 Ill. App. 3d 1201, 375 Ill. Dec. 699, 997 N.E.2d 1010.


text:
    No. 11-6256.
    Enjoli Elan McClendon, Petitioner v. California.
    565 U.S. 1038, 132 S. Ct. 580,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 427,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8259.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, denied.


text:
    No. 11-6262.
    Annette Nash, Petitioner v. Neil B. Ptashnink, et al.
    565 U.S. 1038, 132 S. Ct. 580,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 427,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8106,
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-6266.
    Michelle Catherine Theer, Petitioner v. Annie D. Harvey, Warden.
    565 U.S. 1038, 132 S. Ct. 581,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 427,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8216.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 424 Fed. Appx. 231.


text:
    No. 11-6270.
    Jon M. Withrow, Petitioner v. Texas.
    565 U.S. 1038, 132 S. Ct. 581,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 428,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8193.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.


text:
    No. 11-6272.
    Torrey Deon Abrams, Petitioner v. James Rudek, Warden.
    565 U.S. 1038, 132 S. Ct. 581,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 428,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8143.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 430 Fed. Appx. 685.


text:
    No. 11-6278.
    Antonio T. Sims, Petitioner v. Thomas D. Hanlon, Superintendent, Indiana Correctional Industrial Facility.
    565 U.S. 1038, 132 S. Ct. 582,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 428,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8215.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-6288.
    Monty D. Sullivan, Petitioner v. Wyoming.
    565 U.S. 1038, 132 S. Ct. 582,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 428,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8114.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Wyoming denied.

Same case below, 247 P.3d 879.


text:
    No. 11-6293.
    Wayne Benoit Prince, Petitioner v. Arizona.
    565 U.S. 1038, 132 S. Ct. 582,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 428,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8258.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Arizona denied.

Same case below, 226 Ariz. 516, 250 P.3d 1145.


text:
    No. 11-6297.
    Mary Jones, Petitioner v. Susan Winter, et al.
    565 U.S. 1038, 132 S. Ct. 582,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 428,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8282.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, denied.


text:
    No. 11-6311.
    Marie Assa’ad-Faltas, Petitioner v. City of Columbia, South Carolina.
    565 U.S. 1039, 132 S. Ct. 582,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 428,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8195.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of South Carolina denied.


text:
    No. 11-6316.
    Alex Maldonado, Petitioner v. David L. Runnels, Warden, et al.
    565 U.S. 1039, 132 S. Ct. 582,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 428,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8189.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-6317.
    William Cecil Thornton, Petitioner v. California.
    565 U.S. 1039, 132 S. Ct. 583,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 429,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8201.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.


text:
    No. 11-6319.
    Roland Salazar, aka Roland Cristobal Solazar, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.
    565 U.S. 1039, 132 S. Ct. 583,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 429,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8211.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-6322.
    Randy Andrew Ramer, Petitioner v. Mary Long, et al.
    565 U.S. 1039, 132 S. Ct. 583,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 429,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8198.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 431 Fed. Appx. 73.


text:
    No. 11-6323.
    Victor O., Petitioner v. Connecticut.
    565 U.S. 1039, 132 S. Ct. 583,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 429,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8283.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Connecticut denied.

Same case below, 301 Conn. 163, 20 A.3d 669.


text:
    No. 11-6324.
    Dennis Mouton, III, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.
    565 U.S. 1039, 132 S. Ct. 583,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 429,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8161.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-6336.
    Anne M. Bradley, Petitioner v. Connecticut.
    565 U.S. 1039, 132 S. Ct. 584,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 429,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8239,
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Connecticut denied.


text:
    No. 11-6345.
    Rafael Ponce, Petitioner v. California.
    565 U.S. 1039, 132 S. Ct. 584,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 429,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8175.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division One, denied.


text:
    No. 11-6349.
    Eric Maurice Wright, Petitioner v. Jessica Symmes, Warden.
    565 U.S. 1039, 132 S. Ct. 584,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 429,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8197.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-6353.
    Daniel David Dydzak, Petitioner v. Ronald M. George, Chief Justice, Supreme Court of California, et al.
    565 U.S. 1039, 132 S. Ct. 584,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 430,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8156.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-6354.
    Heidi Dorf, fka Heidi Dragomir, Petitioner v. Jana Griggs, et al.
    565 U.S. 1039, 132 S. Ct. 585,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 430,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8142.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 419 Fed. Appx. 406.


text:
    No. 11-6356.
    Jai Devon Lee, Petitioner v. Stephen Upton, Warden.
    565 U.S. 1039, 132 S. Ct. 585,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 430,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8279.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-6360.
    Craig Steve Bowen, Petitioner v. Georgia.
    565 U.S. 1039, 132 S. Ct. 585,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 430,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8169.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Georgia denied.

Same case below, 307 Ga. App. 204, 704 S.E.2d 436.


text:
    No. 11-6366.
    Gregory Scott Hinton, Petitioner v. California.
    565 U.S. 1039, 132 S. Ct. 585,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 430,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8276.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District, denied.


text:
    No. 11-6383.
    Michael Paul Bradley, Petitioner v. Donald Barrow, Warden.
    565 U.S. 1040, 132 S. Ct. 585,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 430,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8280.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-6384.
    Willie M. Brown, Petitioner v. Mississippi.
    565 U.S. 1040, 132 S. Ct. 585,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 430,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8221.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Mississippi denied.


text:
    No. 11-6386.
    Gabriel McDowell, Petitioner v. Mississippi, et al.
    565 U.S. 1040, 132 S. Ct. 585,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 430,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8281,
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-6387.
    Wilson Christopher Ortega, Petitioner v. California.
    565 U.S. 1040, 132 S. Ct. 586,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 431,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8166.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, denied.


text:
    No. 11-6390.
    Rennie Hurtado, Petitioner v. Dave L. Runnels, Warden, et al.
    565 U.S. 1040, 132 S. Ct. 586,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 431,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8273.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 428 Fed. Appx. 704.


text:
    No. 11-6393.
    Leon Fowler, Petitioner v. Steven Howell.
    565 U.S. 1040, 132 S. Ct. 586,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 431,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8230.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 416 Fed. Appx. 571.


text:
    No. 11-6395.
    Johnnie A. Hollins, Petitioner v. Fulton County, Georgia, et al.
    565 U.S. 1040, 132 S. Ct. 586,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 431,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8275,
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 422 Fed. Appx. 828.


text:
    No. 11-6397.
    Dwight Garrison, Petitioner v. David Rock, Superintendent, Upstate Correctional Facility.
    565 U.S. 1040, 132 S. Ct. 586,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 431,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8128.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-6400.
    Kevin L. Fuqua, Petitioner v. Claude E. Finn, Warden.
    565 U.S. 1040, 132 S. Ct. 586,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 431,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8267.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-6403.
    Dean Jacobs, Petitioner v. California.
    565 U.S. 1040, 132 S. Ct. 587,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 431,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8098.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Three, denied.


text:
    No. 11-6405.
    Gregory T. Gary, Petitioner v. Harold W. Clarke, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.
    565 U.S. 1040, 132 S. Ct. 587,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 431,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8266.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 411 Fed. Appx. 605.


text:
    No. 11-6408.
    Matthew Burl Martin, Petitioner v. Texas.
    565 U.S. 1040, 132 S. Ct. 587,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 432,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8191.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.


text:
    No. 11-6409.
    Alfred Caballero, Petitioner v. James D. Hartley, Warden.
    565 U.S. 1040, 132 S. Ct. 587,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 432,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8235.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-6410.
    James Bernard Campbell, Petitioner v. Kenneth S. Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.
    565 U.S. 1040, 132 S. Ct. 587,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 432,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8186.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-6411.
    James Coddington, Petitioner v. Oklahoma.
    565 U.S. 1040, 132 S. Ct. 588,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 432,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8252.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma denied.

Same case below, 254 P.3d 684.


text:
    No. 11-6413.
    Michael Darren Darby, Petitioner v. Michelle R. Ricci, Administrator, New Jersey State Prison, et al.
    565 U.S. 1041, 132 S. Ct. 588,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 432,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8200.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-6415.
    Michael Petros, Petitioner v. Paul Boos, et al.
    565 U.S. 1041, 132 S. Ct. 588,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 432,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8219,
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 414 Fed. Appx. 569.


text:
    No. 11-6426.
    Leonard Edwards, Petitioner v. Dennis Rubin, et al.
    565 U.S. 1041, 132 S. Ct. 588,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 432,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8278.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-6442.
    Shaeffer Coleman, Petitioner v. Alabama, et al.
    565 U.S. 1041, 132 S. Ct. 589,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 432,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8207.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-6478.
    Inara Cedrins, Petitioner v. Executive Committee of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.
    565 U.S. 1041, 132 S. Ct. 605,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 433,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8253,
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-6480.
    Rolon Lamarr Morris, II, Petitioner v. Tom Carey, Warden, et al.
    565 U.S. 1041, 132 S. Ct. 589,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 433,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8093.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 438 Fed. Appx. 634.


text:
    No. 11-6531.
    Inara Cedrins, Petitioner v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services.
    565 U.S. 1041, 132 S. Ct. 590,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 433,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8115,
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-6538.
    Orlando Cruz, Petitioner v. James McGrady, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Retreat, et al.
    565 U.S. 1041, 132 S. Ct. 590,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 433,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8234.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-6548.
    Randall S. Jones, Petitioner v. Kenneth S. Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.
    565 U.S. 1041, 132 S. Ct. 590,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 433,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8124.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 644 F.3d 1206.


text:
    No. 11-6554.
    David Derringer, Petitioner v. Frances Elaine Baxter, et al.
    565 U.S. 1041, 132 S. Ct. 591,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 433,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8139,
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New Mexico denied.


text:
    No. 11-6571.
    Delma Borbon, Petitioner v. Dawn Davison, Warden.
    565 U.S. 1041, 132 S. Ct. 605,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 433,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8133.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-6577.
    Ronald Dean Lancaster, Petitioner v. Alfred Bigelow, Warden, et al.
    565 U.S. 1041, 132 S. Ct. 591,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 433,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8153,
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 435 Fed. Appx. 773.


text:
    No. 11-6581.
    Jose Luis Mendiola-Ponce, Petitioner v. California.
    565 U.S. 1041, 132 S. Ct. 591,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 434,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8206.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District, denied.


text:
    No. 11-6590.
    Christopher Smith, Petitioner v. California.
    565 U.S. 1041, 132 S. Ct. 591,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 434,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8272.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District, denied.


text:
    No. 11-6597.
    Clarence Zacke, Petitioner v. Kenneth S. Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.
    565 U.S. 1041, 132 S. Ct. 591,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 434,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8257.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-6663.
    Michael Savior, Petitioner v. Pennsylvania.
    565 U.S. 1042, 132 S. Ct. 592,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 434,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8119.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia Office, denied.

Same case below, 26 A.3d 1211.


text:
    No. 11-6697.
    Jamar L. Travillion, Petitioner v. Pennsylvania.
    565 U.S. 1042, 132 S. Ct. 592,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 434,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8274.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Western District, denied.

Same case below, 610 Pa. 13, 17 A.3d 1247.


text:
    No. 11-6703.
    Mary Caston-Goodjohn, Petitioner v. Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
    565 U.S. 1042, 132 S. Ct. 592,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 434,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8277,
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.

Same case below, 409 Fed. Appx. 326.


text:
    No. 11-6770.
    Farley L. Bernard, Petitioner v. Willy Davis.
    565 U.S. 1042, 132 S. Ct. 592,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 434,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8176.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 428 Fed. Appx. 231.


text:
    No. 11-6782.
    Ebrahim Adkins, Petitioner v. Sam Crow, Judge, United States District Court for the District of Kansas, et al.; Ebrahim Adkins, Petitioner v. John Sanders, Judge, District Court of Kansas, Butler County, et al.; Ebrahim Adkins, Petitioner v. J. Thomas Marten, Judge, United States District Court for the District of Kansas, et al.; and Ebrahim Adkins, Petitioner v. Robert Sapien, et al.
    565 U.S. 1042, 132 S. Ct. 592,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 435,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8220.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 432 Fed. Appx. 748 (first and second judgment); 450 Fed. Appx. 699 (third judgment); and 432 Fed. Appx. 751 (fourth judgment).


text:
    No. 11-6815.
    LaDell DeAngelo Brown, Petitioner v. R. Horell, Warden, et al.
    565 U.S. 1042, 132 S. Ct. 593,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 435,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8091.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 644 F.3d 969.


text:
    No. 11-6819.
    Jesus Ramos, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1042, 132 S. Ct. 593,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 435,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8256.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 433 Fed. Appx. 893.


text:
    No. 11-6827.
    Christopher Antonio Staples, aka Christopher Antonio Ross, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1042, 132 S. Ct. 593,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 435,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8218.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 444 Fed. Appx. 706.


text:
    No. 11-6831.
    Michael Baker, Petitioner v. Roger E. Walker, Jr., et al.
    565 U.S. 1042, 132 S. Ct. 593,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 435,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8146.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, Third District, denied.


text:
    No. 11-6834.
    John J. DeRoss, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1042, 132 S. Ct. 593,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 435,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8127.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 645 F.3d 85.


text:
    No. 11-6837.
    Edgar Camacho Torres, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1042, 132 S. Ct. 594,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 435,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8113.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 433 Fed. Appx. 738.


text:
    No. 11-6843.
    Shawn Rice, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1042, 132 S. Ct. 594,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 436,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8123.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-6844.
    Nathaniel Jonathan Smith, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1042, 132 S. Ct. 594,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 436,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8183.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 645 F.3d 998.


text:
    No. 11-6846.
    Michael J. Modena, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1043, 132 S. Ct. 594,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 436,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8264.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 430 Fed. Appx. 444.


text:
    No. 11-6853.
    Latchmie Narayan Too-lasprashad, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1043, 132 S. Ct. 594,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 436,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8164.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 430 Fed. Appx. 240.


text:
    No. 11-6855.
    Lavan Maurice Walker, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1043, 132 S. Ct. 595,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 436,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8147.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-6856.
    Daniel Watlington, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1043, 132 S. Ct. 595,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 436,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8097.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 427 Fed. Appx. 279.


text:
    No. 11-6859.
    David Velasco-Castaneda, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1043, 132 S. Ct. 595,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 436,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8126.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 442 Fed. Appx. 316.


text:
    No. 11-6860.
    Emiliano Ramirez-Garcia, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1043, 132 S. Ct. 595,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 436,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8271.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 646 F.3d 778.


text:
    No. 11-6861.
    Ricardo Lamont Rusan, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1043, 132 S. Ct. 595,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 437,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8172.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-6864.
    Miguel Ruiz, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1043, 132 S. Ct. 595,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 437,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8105.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 429 Fed. Appx. 374.


text:
    No. 11-6866.
    Shelton Harris, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1043, 132 S. Ct. 596,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 437,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8112.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 435 Fed. Appx. 174.


text:
    No. 11-6868.
    Jose Felix Delgadillo, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1043, 132 S. Ct. 596,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 437,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8233.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 11-6871.
    Terrance Williams, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1043, 132 S. Ct. 596,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 437,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8236.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 428 Fed. Appx. 134.


text:
    No. 11-6874.
    Pedro Michael Gon-calves, aka Mike Goncalves, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1043, 132 S. Ct. 596,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 437,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8217.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.

Same case below, 642 F.3d 245.


text:
    No. 11-6875.
    Armando Garcia, Petitioner v. United States.
    565 U.S. 1043, 132 S. Ct. 596,
    181 L. Ed. 2d 437,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 8255.
    November 14, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 432 Fed. Appx. 365.