text:
    No. 10-9482.
    Keith Jennings, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1014, 131 S. Ct. 3015,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 840,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4488.
    June 13, 2011.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Former decision, 563 U.S. 956, 131 S. Ct. 2128, 179 L. Ed. 2d 927, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 2933.


source: Caselaw Access Project

license: Public Domain

text:
    No. D-2570.
    In the Matter of Disbarment of William Anthony Helm.
    564 U.S. 1002, 131 S. Ct. 3016,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 840,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4493.
    June 13, 2011.
   Disbarment entered.

Former order, 562 U.S. 818, 131 S. Ct. 411, 178 L. Ed. 2d 274, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 7559.


text:
    No. D-2581.
    In the Matter of Disbarment of William S. Lerach.
    564 U.S. 1002, 131 S. Ct. 3016,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 840,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4457.
    June 13, 2011.
   Disbarment entered.

Former order, 562 U.S. 1040, 131 S. Ct. 629, 178 L. Ed. 2d 458, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 9025.


text:
    No. D-2582.
    In the Matter of Disbarment of Richard Glennan Cervizzi.
    564 U.S. 1002, 131 S. Ct. 3016,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 840,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4416.
    June 13, 2011.
   Disbarment entered.

Former order, 562 U.S. 1040, 131 S. Ct. 630, 178 L. Ed. 2d 458, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 9026.


text:
    No. D-2583.
    In the Matter of Disbarment of Perry S. Reich.
    564 U.S. 1002, 131 S. Ct. 3016,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 840,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4398.
    June 13, 2011.
   Disbarment entered.

Former order, 562 U.S. 1040, 131 S. Ct. 630, 178 L. Ed. 2d 458, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 9014.


text:
    No. D-2584.
    In the Matter of Disbarment of Michael Wayne Ryan, Jr.
    564 U.S. 1002, 131 S. Ct. 3016,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 840,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4465.
    June 13, 2011.
   Disbarment entered.

Former order, 562 U.S. 1040, 131 S. Ct. 630, 178 L. Ed. 2d 458, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 9029.


text:
    No. D-2585.
    In the Matter of Disbarment of Stephen Edward Ford.
    564 U.S. 1002, 131 S. Ct. 3016,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 840,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4450.
    June 13, 2011.
   Disbarment entered.

Former order, 562 U.S. 1040, 131 S. Ct. 630, 178 L. Ed. 2d 458, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 9022.


text:
    No. D-2586.
    In the Matter of Disbarment of Stephen T. Mitchell.
    564 U.S. 1002, 131 S. Ct. 3016,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 841,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4506.
    June 13, 2011.
   Disbarment entered.

Former order, 562 U.S. 1041, 131 S. Ct. 630, 178 L. Ed. 2d 458, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 9012.


text:
    No. D-2587.
    In the Matter of Disbarment of Kathleen Kauth Trum.
    564 U.S. 1003, 131 S. Ct. 3017,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 841,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4399.
    June 13, 2011.
   Disbarment entered.

Former order, 562 U.S. 1041, 131 S. Ct. 631, 178 L. Ed. 2d 459, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 9015.


text:
    No. 09-5128 (10A1212).
    John Lezell Balentine, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.
    564 U.S. 1014, 131 S. Ct. 3017,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 841,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4553.
    June 15, 2011.
   Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Scalia, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Motion for leave to file a petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 558 U.S. 1003, 130 S. Ct. 520, 175 L. Ed. 2d 368, 2009 U.S. LEXIS 7871.


text:
    No. 10-7387.
    Monroe Ace Setser, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1014, 131 S. Ct. 3017,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 841,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4555.
    June 15, 2011.
   Evan A. Young, Esquire, of Austin, Texas, is invited to brief and argue this case, as amicus curiae, in support of the judgment below.


text:
    No. 10A1226 (10-11036).
    John Lezell Balentine, Petitioner v. Texas.
    564 U.S. 1014, 131 S. Ct. 3017,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 841,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4554.
    June 15, 2011.
   Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Scalia, and by him referred to the Court, is granted pending the disposition of the petition for writ of certiorari. Should the petition for writ of certiorari be denied, this stay shall terminate automatically. In the event the petition for writ of certiorari is granted, the stay shall terminate upon the issuance of the mandate of this Court.


text:
    No. 10A1236 (10-11056).
    Lee Andrew Taylor, Petitioner v. Texas.
    564 U.S. 1014, 131 S. Ct. 3017,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 841,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4563.
    June 16, 2011.
   Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Scalia, and by him referred to the Court, denied.

Justice Ginsburg, Justice Breyer, Justice Sotomayor, and Justice Kagan would grant the application for stay of execution.


text:
    No. 10-10994 (10A1219).
    Eddie Duval Powell, Petitioner v. Alabama.
    564 U.S. 1015, 131 S. Ct. 3017,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 841,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4562.
    June 16, 2011.
   Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Thomas, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Alabama denied.


text:
    No. 10-11055 (10A1235).
    Eddie D. Powell, Petitioner v. Kim Thomas, Interim Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections, et al.
    564 U.S. 1015, 131 S. Ct. 3018,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 842,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4561.
    June 16, 2011.
   Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Thomas, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 643 F.3d 1300.


text:
    No. 09-10276.
    James Rogers, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1015, 131 S. Ct. 3018,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 842,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4652.
    June 20, 2011.
   On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for further consideration in light of Sykes v. United States, 564 U.S. 1, 131 S. Ct. 2267, 180 L. Ed. 2d 60 (2011).

Same case below, 594 F.3d 517.


text:
    No. 10-9984.
    Waadew Aysisayh, Petitioner v. Florida.
    564 U.S. 1015, 131 S. Ct. 3030,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 842,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4716.
    June 20, 2011.
   Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, dismissed. See Rule 39.8.

Same case below, 56 So. 3d 2.


text:
    No. 10-10596.
    John Randall Futch, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1015, 131 S. Ct. 3046,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 842,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4721.
    June 20, 2011.
   Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.


text:
    No. 10M84.
    Jacqueline Shiplet, Petitioner v. Thomas J. Vilsack, Secretary of Agriculture.
    564 U.S. 1017, 131 S. Ct. 3049,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 842,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4763.
    June 20, 2011.
   Motion for leave to file a petition for writ of certiorari with supplemental appendix under seal granted, except that the order of May 15, 2009, shall be placed in the public record.


text:
    No. 10M114.
    Alberto Fernandez, Petitioner v. Mike Martel, Warden, et al.
    564 U.S. 1017, 131 S. Ct. 3049,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 842,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4758.
    June 20, 2011.
   Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.


text:
    No. 10-1285.
    Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., Petitioner v. Francisco Rodriguez, et ux.
    564 U.S. 1017, 131 S. Ct. 3049,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 843,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4729.
    June 20, 2011.
   The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.


text:
    No. 10-10008.
    Rosario A. Fiorani, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1017, 131 S. Ct. 3049,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 843,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4667.
    June 20, 2011.
   Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied.


text:
    No. 10-10528.
    Roger J. Day, Petitioner v. Minnesota, et al.
    564 U.S. 1017, 131 S. Ct. 3049,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 843,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4648.
    June 20, 2011.
   Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until July 11, 2011, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.


text:
    No. 10-218.
    PPL Montana, LLC, Petitioner v. Montana.
    564 U.S. 1018, 131 S. Ct. 3019,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 843,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4767.
    June 20, 2011.
   Motion of Professor David Emmons, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Montana granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.

Same case below, 355 Mont. 402, 229 P.3d 421.


text:
    No. 10-708.
    First American Financial Corporation, Successor in Interest to The First American Corporation, et al., Petitioners v. Denise P. Edwards.
    564 U.S. 1018, 131 S. Ct. 3022,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 843,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4668.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted limited to Question 2 presented by the petition.

Same case below, 610 F.3d 514.


text:
    No. 10-1024.
    Federal Aviation Administration, et al., Petitioners v. Stanmore Cawthon Cooper.
    564 U.S. 1018, 131 S. Ct. 3025,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 843,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4686.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 622 F.3d 1016.


text:
    No. 10-1150.
    Mayo Collaborative Services, dba Mayo Medical Laboratories, et al., Petitioners v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.
    564 U.S. 1018, 131 S. Ct. 3027,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 844,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4764.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit granted.

Same case below, 628 F.3d 1347.


text:
    No. 09-10868.
    Anthony Harris, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1018, 131 S. Ct. 3018,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 844,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4634.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 586 F.3d 1283.


text:
    No. 10-109.
    Anthony Dismuke, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1018, 131 S. Ct. 3018,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 844,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4607.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 593 F.3d 582.


text:
    No. 10-314.
    Devin Welch, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1018, 131 S. Ct. 3019,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 844,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4700.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 604 F.3d 408.


text:
    No. 10-426.
    Applera Corp., et al., Petitioners v. Enzo Biochem, Inc., et al.
    564 U.S. 1018, 131 S. Ct. 3020,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 844,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4713.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.

Same case below, 599 F.3d 1325.


text:
    No. 10-535.
    RH Capital Associates LLC, et al., Petitioners v. Mayer Brown LLP, et al.
    564 U.S. 1018, 131 S. Ct. 3021,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 844,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4674.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 603 F.3d 144.


text:
    No. 10-717.
    Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida, Petitioner v. Kraus-Anderson Construction Company.
    564 U.S. 1018, 131 S. Ct. 3022,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 844,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4748.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 607 F.3d 1268.


text:
    No. 10-803.
    Del Banjo, Petitioner v. Vince Cullen, Acting Warden.
    564 U.S. 1019, 131 S. Ct. 3023,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 844,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4617.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 614 F.3d 964.


text:
    No. 10-838.
    Pacific Bell Telephone Company, dba AT&T California, Petitioner v. California Public Utilities Commission, et al.
    564 U.S. 1019, 131 S. Ct. 3050,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 845,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4693.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 621 F.3d 836.


text:
    No. 10-929.
    Dennis Daugaard, Governor of South Dakota, et al., Petitioners v. Yankton Sioux Tribe, et al.
    564 U.S. 1019, 131 S. Ct. 3024,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 845,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4720.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 606 F.3d 994.


text:
    No. 10-931.
    Southern Missouri Recycling and Waste Management District, Petitioner v. Yankton Sioux Tribe, et al.
    564 U.S. 1019, 131 S. Ct. 3024,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 845,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4670.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 606 F.3d 994.


text:
    No. 10-932.
    Pam Hein, States Attorney of Charles Mix County, South Dakota, et al., Petitioners v. Yankton Sioux Tribe, et al.
    564 U.S. 1019, 131 S. Ct. 3024,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 845,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4702.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 606 F.3d 994.


text:
    No. 10-1058.
    Yankton Sioux Tribe, et al., Petitioners v. Dennis Daugaard, Governor of South Dakota, et al.
    564 U.S. 1019, 131 S. Ct. 3026,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 845,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4657.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 606 F.3d 994.


text:
    No. 10-1044.
    Ed Strickland, et al., Petitioners v. City of Seattle, Washington.
    564 U.S. 1019, 131 S. Ct. 3025,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 845,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4602.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 394 Fed. Appx. 407.


text:
    No. 10-1156.
    Troy Burdine, Petitioner v. Richard Weiss, Director, Arkansas Department of Finance and Administration.
    564 U.S. 1019, 131 S. Ct. 3027,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 845,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4608.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Supreme Court of Arkansas denied.

Same case below, 379 S.W.3d 476.


text:
    No. 10-1177.
    Wyeth LLC, et al., Petitioners v. Jeraldine Scofield, et al.
    564 U.S. 1019, 131 S. Ct. 3028,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 846,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4681.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Nevada denied.

Same case below, 126 Nev. 446, 244 P.3d 765.


text:
    No. 10-1226.
    Jose Antonio Rodriguez, Petitioner v. FedEx Freight East, Inc.
    564 U.S. 1019, 131 S. Ct. 3028,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 846,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4639.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 403 Fed. Appx. 55.


text:
    No. 10-1254.
    Lana Parker, Petitioner v. Richmond County Board of Education.
    564 U.S. 1019, 131 S. Ct. 3028,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 846,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4587,
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 403 Fed. Appx. 477.


text:
    No. 10-1256.
    Bill Chan, Petitioner v. Craig T. Lund, et al.
    564 U.S. 1019, 131 S. Ct. 3028,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 846,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4733.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District, denied.

Same case below, 188 Cal. App. 4th 1159, 116 Cal. Rptr. 3d 122.


text:
    No. 10-1263.
    David Johns Bryson, Petitioner v. Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, et al.
    564 U.S. 1019, 131 S. Ct. 3030,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 846,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4685.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 627 F.3d 784.


text:
    No. 10-1270.
    Garrett Dotch, Petitioner v. Alabama.
    564 U.S. 1020, 131 S. Ct. 3030,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 846,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4695.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama denied.

Same case below, 67 So. 3d 936.


text:
    No. 10-1271.
    Billie Wayne Coble, Petitioner v. Texas.
    564 U.S. 1020, 131 S. Ct. 3030,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 846,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4622.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.

Same case below, 330 S.W.3d 253.


text:
    No. 10-1272.
    Logie W. Talley, Petitioner v. Housing Authority of Columbus, Georgia, et al.
    564 U.S. 1020, 131 S. Ct. 3031,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 846,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4612,
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 402 Fed. Appx. 463.


text:
    No. 10-1275.
    James Constant, Petitioner v. California ex rel. Department of Transportation.
    564 U.S. 1020, 131 S. Ct. 3031,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 847,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4678,
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two, denied.


text:
    No. 10-1277.
    Elizabeth Campbell, Petitioner v. Kellermyer Building Services, LLC.
    564 U.S. 1020, 131 S. Ct. 3031,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 847,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4773,
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh Office, denied.


text:
    No. 10-1279.
    Edward H. Flint, Petitioner v. Katie King, Judge, District Court of Kentucky, Jefferson County.
    564 U.S. 1020, 131 S. Ct. 3031,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 847,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4620.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 10-1280.
    James Widtfeldt, Petitioner v. Nebraska Equal Opportunity Commission, et al.
    564 U.S. 1020, 131 S. Ct. 3032,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 847,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4730,
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Nebraska denied.


text:
    No. 10-1281.
    Gerald Wayne Lindgren, Petitioner v. Glacial Plains Cooperative.
    564 U.S. 1020, 131 S. Ct. 3032,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 847,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4645.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Court of Appeals of Minnesota denied.


text:
    No. 10-1288.
    Yiling Zhang, Petitioner v. Inland Counties Regional Center, Inc.
    564 U.S. 1020, 131 S. Ct. 3032,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 847,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4743.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two, denied.


text:
    No. 10-1355.
    John Racz, Petitioner v. California.
    564 U.S. 1020, 131 S. Ct. 3038,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 847,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4626.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, denied.


text:
    No. 10-1387.
    No. 10-10483.
    Donny G. Douglas, Petitioner v. United States. Jay Campbell, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1020, 131 S. Ct. 3039,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 847,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4680.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petitions for writs of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same cases below, 634 F.3d 852.


text:
    No. 10-1392.
    Janice Haagensen, Petitioner v. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, et al.
    564 U.S. 1020, 131 S. Ct. 3050,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 848,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4703.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 390 Fed. Appx. 94.


text:
    No. 10-1398.
    Dustin John Busson-Sokolik, et al., Petitioners v. Milwaukee School of Engineering.
    564 U.S. 1020, 131 S. Ct. 3039,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 848,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4722.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same cases below, 635 F.3d 261.


text:
    No. 10-1400.
    Qantas Airways Limited, Petitioner v. UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc., fka Menlo Worldwide Forwarding, Inc.
    564 U.S. 1020, 131 S. Ct. 3039,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 848,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4777.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 634 F.3d 1023.


text:
    No. 10-1407.
    Jason Matthis, Petitioner v. Burl Cain, Warden.
    564 U.S. 1021, 131 S. Ct. 3040,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 848,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4694.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 627 F.3d 1001.


text:
    No. 10-1429.
    Howard Wampler, Larry C. Shaver, and Lewis P. Colbert, Petitioners v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1021, 131 S. Ct. 3045,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 848,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4589.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 624 F.3d 1330.


text:
    No. 10-5289.
    David Earl Hughes, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1021, 131 S. Ct. 3018,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 848,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4635.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 602 F.3d 669.


text:
    No. 10-6048.
    Demetrius S. Partee and Oscar A. Rash, Petitioners v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1021, 131 S. Ct. 3019,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 848,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4613.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 373 Fed. Appx. 602.


text:
    No. 10-6076.
    Ritchie Bufford, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1021, 131 S. Ct. 3019,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 848,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4664.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 373 Fed. Appx. 602.


text:
    No. 10-6106.
    Ellis Members, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1021, 131 S. Ct. 3019,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 849,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4600.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 376 Fed. Appx. 633.


text:
    No. 10-6217.
    Fred Andrew Ramos, aka Freddie Andrew Ramos, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1021, 131 S. Ct. 3019,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 849,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4772.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 376 Fed. Appx. 457.


text:
    No. 10-6440.
    William Travis Warren, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1021, 131 S. Ct. 3020,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 849,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4677.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 383 Fed. Appx. 360.


text:
    No. 10-6654.
    Anthony Womack, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1021, 131 S. Ct. 3020,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 849,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4588.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 610 F.3d 427.


text:
    No. 10-6658.
    Michael Wise, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1021, 131 S. Ct. 3020,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 849,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4691.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 597 F.3d 1141.


text:
    No. 10-6664.
    Charles T. Dunson, Petitioner v. United States; and Adriane Rice, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1021, 131 S. Ct. 3020,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 849,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4774.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 603 F.3d 1023 (first judgment).


text:
    No. 10-6667.
    Larry Edward Petersen, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1021, 131 S. Ct. 3020,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 849,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4688.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 383 Fed. Appx. 458.


text:
    No. 10-6832.
    Ronald L. Rudd, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1021, 131 S. Ct. 3021,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 849,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4741.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 10-6864.
    Jerome Weekes, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1021, 131 S. Ct. 3021,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 850,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4605.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.

Same case below, 611 F.3d 68.


text:
    No. 10-6991.
    Jason C. McConnell, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1021, 131 S. Ct. 3021,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 850,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4747.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 605 F.3d 822.


text:
    No. 10-7164.
    Warren Ethingor, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1022, 131 S. Ct. 3022,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 850,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4737.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 388 Fed. Appx. 858.


text:
    No. 10-7205.
    Harold L. Gooch, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1022, 131 S. Ct. 3022,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 850,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4609.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 10-7305.
    John Louis Atkins, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1022, 131 S. Ct. 3022,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 850,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4752.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 379 Fed. Appx. 762.


text:
    No. 10-7332.
    Kenneth Irving Askew, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1022, 131 S. Ct. 3022,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 850,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4669.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 384 Fed. Appx. 504.


text:
    No. 10-7811.
    Kevin Jerome Pullum, Petitioner v. Mike McDonald, Warden.
    564 U.S. 1022, 131 S. Ct. 3023,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 850,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4738.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 380 Fed. Appx. 663.


text:
    No. 10-7934.
    Kevin Stephens, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1022, 131 S. Ct. 3023,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 850,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4629.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 393 Fed. Appx. 340.


text:
    No. 10-7942.
    Michael Kluge, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1022, 131 S. Ct. 3023,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 851,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4614.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 614 F.3d 852.


text:
    No. 10-8286.
    Ricky Leon Dority, Petitioner v. Keith Roy, Warden.
    564 U.S. 1022, 131 S. Ct. 3023,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 851,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4632.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 402 Fed. Appx. 2.


text:
    No. 10-8354.
    Donnale C. Clay, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1022, 131 S. Ct. 3023,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 851,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4590.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 622 F.3d 892.


text:
    No. 10-8671.
    Mario Salgado, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1022, 131 S. Ct. 3024,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 851,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4599.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 398 Fed. Appx. 972.


text:
    No. 10-8734.
    Abelardo Sanchez-Ledezma, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1022, 131 S. Ct. 3024,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 851,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4699.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 630 F.3d 447.


text:
    No. 10-8792.
    Jose Francisco Sanchez Aragon, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1022, 131 S. Ct. 3024,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 851,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4655.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 10-8846.
    Donald Noah, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1022, 131 S. Ct. 3025,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 851,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4736.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 401 Fed. Appx. 54.


text:
    No. 10-8926.
    Clinton Wade Dunson, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1022, 131 S. Ct. 3025,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 851,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4751.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 10-9053.
    Simon Serrato Mancera, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1022, 131 S. Ct. 3025,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 852,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4665.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 401 Fed. Appx. 977.


text:
    No. 10-9085.
    Kerry Spencer, Petitioner v. Alabama.
    564 U.S. 1022, 131 S. Ct. 3026,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 852,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4719,
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama denied.

Same case below, 58 So. 3d 215.


text:
    No. 10-9399.
    No. 10-9420.
    Brandon Dineshu Begay, aka Brandon Dineshe Begay, Petitioner v. United States. Ozzy Carl Watchman, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1023, 131 S. Ct. 3026,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 852,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4627.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petitions for writs of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same cases below, 622 F.3d 1187.


text:
    No. 10-9514.
    Scott Louis Panetti, Petitioner v. Texas.
    564 U.S. 1023, 131 S. Ct. 3027,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 852,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4647.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.

Same case below, 326 S.W.3d 615.


text:
    No. 10-9516.
    Nakia Pettus, Petitioner v. United States, et al.
    564 U.S. 1023, 131 S. Ct. 3027,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 852,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4710,
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 10-9617.
    Monika Lukasiewicz-Kruk, Petitioner v. Greenpoint YMCA, et al.
    564 U.S. 1023, 131 S. Ct. 3027,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 852,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4698.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 404 Fed. Appx. 519.


text:
    No. 10-10012.
    Adrian Marion Smith, Petitioner v. City of Aiken, South Carolina, Public Works, et al.
    564 U.S. 1023, 131 S. Ct. 3028,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 852,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4745.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 409 Fed. Appx. 665.


text:
    No. 10-10013.
    Charles Brandon Parks, Petitioner v. Randall Lowe, et al.
    564 U.S. 1023, 131 S. Ct. 3028,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 852,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4642,
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 407 Fed. Appx. 643.


text:
    No. 10-10015.
    Julio Alberto Marcos, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.
    564 U.S. 1023, 131 S. Ct. 3029,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 853,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4616,
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 10-10017.
    George Dennis Rounds, Jr., Petitioner v. California Department of Corrections.
    564 U.S. 1023, 131 S. Ct. 3050,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 853,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4630.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 10-10018.
    Kenneth R. Isom, Petitioner v. Arkansas (two judgments).
    564 U.S. 1023, 131 S. Ct. 3029,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 853,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4749.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Supreme Court of Arkansas denied.

Same case below, 372 S.W.3d 809 (first judgment), 370 S.W.3d 491 (second judgment).


text:
    No. 10-10020.
    Bryon Garnett, Petitioner v. Dwight Neven, Warden, et al.
    564 U.S. 1023, 131 S. Ct. 3029,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 853,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4643.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 408 Fed. Appx. 47.


text:
    No. 10-10025.
    David Sutherlin, Petitioner v. Edward Oliver, et al.
    564 U.S. 1023, 131 S. Ct. 3029,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 853,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4662.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 10-10026.
    Walter Charles Jones, Petitioner v. Texas.
    564 U.S. 1023, 131 S. Ct. 3029,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 853,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4750.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 10-10028.
    Bryan Randall Monkres, Petitioner v. Rosanne Campbell, Warden, et al.
    564 U.S. 1023, 131 S. Ct. 3029,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 853,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4715.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 408 Fed. Appx. 101.


text:
    No. 10-10031.
    Scott Ranstrom, Petitioner v. Eldridge Construction, Inc., et al.
    564 U.S. 1024, 131 S. Ct. 3030,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 853,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4644.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District, denied.


text:
    No. 10-10032.
    George Lateef Mosby, Petitioner v. Florida.
    564 U.S. 1024, 131 S. Ct. 3031,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 854,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4663.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District, denied.

Same case below, 44 So. 3d 1187.


text:
    No. 10-10034.
    Fred E. Christian, Petitioner v. Frank Bommarito Oldsmobile, Inc., dba Bommarito Infinity.
    564 U.S. 1024, 131 S. Ct. 3031,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 854,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4593.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 403 Fed. Appx. 133.


text:
    No. 10-10035.
    James Carrodine, Petitioner v. Kenneth McKee, Warden.
    564 U.S. 1024, 131 S. Ct. 3032,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 854,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4656.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 10-10036.
    Jorge Gevara, aka Jorge Galeas, Jr., Petitioner v. Boyd Bennett, et al.
    564 U.S. 1024, 131 S. Ct. 3032,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 854,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4610.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 406 Fed. Appx. 704.


text:
    No. 10-10037.
    Jorge Gevara, Petitioner v. F. B. Hubbard, et al.
    564 U.S. 1024, 131 S. Ct. 3032,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 854,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4628.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 408 Fed. Appx. 772.


text:
    No. 10-10038.
    Jorge Gevara, aka Jorge Galeas, Petitioner v. Alvin W. Keller, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Correction, et al.
    564 U.S. 1024, 131 S. Ct. 3033,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 854,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4689.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 408 Fed. Appx. 761.


text:
    No. 10-10040.
    David Gonzales, Petitioner v. Kenneth Romanowski, Warden.
    564 U.S. 1024, 131 S. Ct. 3033,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 854,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4771.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 10-10044.
    Larry Edward Hendricks, Petitioner v. LeVern Cohen, Warden.
    564 U.S. 1024, 131 S. Ct. 3033,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 854,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4760.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 378 Fed. Appx. 356.


text:
    No. 10-10045.
    Larry Edward Hendricks, Petitioner v. Alan Wilson, Attorney General of South Carolina, et al.
    564 U.S. 1024, 131 S. Ct. 3033,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 855,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4709.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 390 Fed. Appx. 282.


text:
    No. 10-10052.
    Steven Ray Shelton, Petitioner v. Jacquelyn Banks, Warden.
    564 U.S. 1024, 131 S. Ct. 3033,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 855,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4597.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 10-10069.
    Fred Elmer Jones, Jr., Petitioner v. Karrie Jones Harmon.
    564 U.S. 1024, 131 S. Ct. 3034,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 855,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4769.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Court of Appeals of Missouri, Eastern District, denied.

Same case below, 329 S.W.3d 396.


text:
    No. 10-10070.
    Janis Lee Schmidt, Petitioner v. Warwick Public School District #29, et al.
    564 U.S. 1024, 131 S. Ct. 3034,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 855,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4708.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Supreme Court of North Dakota denied.

Same case below, 795 N.W.2d 37.


text:
    No. 10-10071.
    Kyle Allen, Petitioner v. Massachusetts.
    564 U.S. 1024, 131 S. Ct. 3034,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 855,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4684.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Superior Court of Massachusetts, Essex County, denied.


text:
    No. 10-10072.
    Mark C. Arflack, Petitioner v. Henderson County, Kentucky, et al.
    564 U.S. 1025, 131 S. Ct. 3034,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 855,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4746.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 412 Fed. Appx. 829.


text:
    No. 10-10074.
    Jason Mency, Petitioner v. Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County, et al.
    564 U.S. 1025, 131 S. Ct. 3034,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 855,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4654.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, denied.


text:
    No. 10-10076.
    Anthoney D. Lynch, Petitioner v. California.
    564 U.S. 1025, 131 S. Ct. 3034,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 855,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4731.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.


text:
    No. 10-10077.
    Harrison LaVergne, Jr., Petitioner v. California.
    564 U.S. 1025, 131 S. Ct. 3035,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 856,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4682.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two, denied.


text:
    No. 10-10085.
    Michael Eugene Wilkerson, Petitioner v. Tennessee.
    564 U.S. 1025, 131 S. Ct. 3035,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 856,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4727.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, Middle Division, denied.


text:
    No. 10-10087.
    Edward Williams, Petitioner v. Summit County Auditor, et al.
    564 U.S. 1025, 131 S. Ct. 3035,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 856,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4640.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 10-10088.
    James Glenn Whitley, Petitioner v. Texas.
    564 U.S. 1025, 131 S. Ct. 3035,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 856,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4615.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, denied.


text:
    No. 10-10094.
    Anthony Bell, Petitioner v. Louisiana.
    564 U.S. 1025, 131 S. Ct. 3035,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 856,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4690.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Supreme Court of Louisiana denied.

Same case below, 53 So. 3d 437.


text:
    No. 10-10095.
    Delmo Figura Torrefranca, Petitioner v. Tom Horne, Attorney General of Arizona, et al.; and Delmo Figura Torrefranca, Petitioner v. Charles L. Ryan, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, et al.
    564 U.S. 1025, 131 S. Ct. 3035,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 856,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4718,
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 10-10097.
    John Byron Yarbrough, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.
    564 U.S. 1025, 131 S. Ct. 3036,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 856,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4619.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 10-10117.
    Dominica Sims, Petitioner v. Susan B. Davis, Warden.
    564 U.S. 1025, 131 S. Ct. 3036,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 856,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4697.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 10-10119.
    Sy Roeuth, Petitioner v. John Fayram, Warden.
    564 U.S. 1025, 131 S. Ct. 3036,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 857,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4756.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 10-10151.
    Robert Kevin McCartney, Petitioner v. Carolyn Ryland, et al.
    564 U.S. 1025, 131 S. Ct. 3036,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 857,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4778.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Supreme Court of Louisiana denied.

Same case below, 60 So. 3d 1256.


text:
    No. 10-10208.
    Teng Vang, Petitioner v. William Pollard, Warden.
    564 U.S. 1025, 131 S. Ct. 3036,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 857,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4653.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 10-10222.
    Robin Robinson, Petitioner v. United States Marshals Service, et al.
    564 U.S. 1026, 131 S. Ct. 3037,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 857,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4724.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 10-10238.
    Eugene Edward Abramczyk, Petitioner v. Mary Berghuis, Warden.
    564 U.S. 1026, 131 S. Ct. 3037,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 857,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4636.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 10-10248.
    Eric C. Burgie, Petitioner v. Jim R. Hannah, Chief Justice, Supreme Court of Arkansas, et al.
    564 U.S. 1026, 131 S. Ct. 3037,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 857,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4766.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 407 Fed. Appx. 84.


text:
    No. 10-10253.
    William Sim Spencer, Petitioner v. Shirlee Harry, Warden.
    564 U.S. 1026, 131 S. Ct. 3037,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 857,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4660.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 10-10263.
    Stephen Henry Scharosch, Petitioner v. Jack Palmer, Warden.
    564 U.S. 1026, 131 S. Ct. 3037,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 857,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4701.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 10-10268.
    David Lamb, Petitioner v. Carmen Palmer, Warden.
    564 U.S. 1026, 131 S. Ct. 3037,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 858,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4740,
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 10-10275.
    Steven Ray Perridon, Petitioner v. Ernie Roe, Warden, et al.
    564 U.S. 1026, 131 S. Ct. 3038,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 858,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4592.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 408 Fed. Appx. 115.


text:
    No. 10-10298.
    Calvin Paul Stewart, Petitioner v. Utah.
    564 U.S. 1026, 131 S. Ct. 3038,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 858,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4765.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Court of Appeals of Utah denied.


text:
    No. 10-10335.
    Travis Clinton Hittson, Petitioner v. Carl Humphrey, Warden.
    564 U.S. 1026, 131 S. Ct. 3038,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 858,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4704.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Superior Court of Georgia, Butts County, denied.


text:
    No. 10-10361.
    Dominic M. Franza, Petitioner v. James J. Walsh, Superintendent, Sullivan Correctional Facility.
    564 U.S. 1026, 131 S. Ct. 3038,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 858,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4762.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Third Judicial Department, denied.

Same case below, 76 App. Div. 3d 1160, 907 N.Y.S.2d 725.


text:
    No. 10-10373.
    Kevin C. Brathwaite, Petitioner v. Perry Phelps, Warden, et al.
    564 U.S. 1026, 131 S. Ct. 3038,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 858,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4594.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 418 Fed. Appx. 142.


text:
    No. 10-10378.
    Derrick Lakey, Petitioner v. Matthew Cate, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.
    564 U.S. 1026, 131 S. Ct. 3039,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 858,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4611.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 633 F.3d 782.


text:
    No. 10-10389.
    James William Aussicker, Petitioner v. Cindi Curtin, Warden.
    564 U.S. 1026, 131 S. Ct. 3039,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 858,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4646,
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 10-10420.
    No. 10-10556.
    Maurice Benn, Petitioner v. United States. Gregory Gaines, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1026, 131 S. Ct. 3039,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 859,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4759.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petitions for writs of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same cases below, 414 Fed. Appx. 206.


text:
    No. 10-10489.
    Timothy Jay King, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1027, 131 S. Ct. 3040,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 859,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4623.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 410 Fed. Appx. 757.


text:
    No. 10-10530.
    Jaime Antonio Martinez, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1027, 131 S. Ct. 3040,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 859,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4781.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 10-10538.
    Peter Whyte, Petitioner v. Wisconsin.
    564 U.S. 1027, 131 S. Ct. 3041,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 859,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4768.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, District III, denied.

Same case below, 330 Wis. 2d 496, 792 N.W.2d 239.


text:
    No. 10-10542.
    Marcus R. Johnson, Petitioner v. Steven Upton, Warden.
    564 U.S. 1027, 131 S. Ct. 3041,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 859,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4666.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 615 F.3d 1318.


text:
    No. 10-10547.
    Russell N. Donovan, III, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1027, 131 S. Ct. 3041,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 859,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4679.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 410 Fed. Appx. 979.


text:
    No. 10-10550.
    Veronica Vincent, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1027, 131 S. Ct. 3041,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 859,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4601.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 10-10551.
    Deborah Cummings, aka Deborah Davila, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1027, 131 S. Ct. 3041,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 859,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4784,
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 10-10552.
    Zhi Yong Guo, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1027, 131 S. Ct. 3041,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 860,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4651.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 634 F.3d 1119 and 422 Fed. Appx. 596.


text:
    No. 10-10554.
    Stephanie Hampton, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1027, 131 S. Ct. 3042,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 860,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4618.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 633 F.3d 334.


text:
    No. 10-10555.
    Leonel Garcia, III, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1027, 131 S. Ct. 3042,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 860,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4739.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 412 Fed. Appx. 693.


text:
    No. 10-10557.
    Paula Gonzales, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1027, 131 S. Ct. 3042,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 860,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4671.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 411 Fed. Appx. 751.


text:
    No. 10-10559.
    Karen Hawkins, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1027, 131 S. Ct. 3042,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 860,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4705.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 409 Fed. Appx. 507.


text:
    No. 10-10560.
    Montel Goings, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1027, 131 S. Ct. 3042,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 860,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4770.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 407 Fed. Appx. 967.


text:
    No. 10-10561.
    Donell Hatcher, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1027, 131 S. Ct. 3043,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 860,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4712.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 414 Fed. Appx. 944.


text:
    No. 10-10564.
    Ronald L. Halstead, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1027, 131 S. Ct. 3043,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 860,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4780.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 634 F.3d 270.


text:
    No. 10-10570.
    Jose Donilio Pineda, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1027, 131 S. Ct. 3043,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 861,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4696.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 411 Fed. Appx. 612.


text:
    No. 10-10571.
    LaVonne Davis, Petitioner v. House of Representatives, Eleanor Holmes Norton’s Office.
    564 U.S. 1028, 131 S. Ct. 3043,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 861,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4753,
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

Same case below, 409 Fed. Appx. 355.


text:
    No. 10-10572.
    Enrique Coronado, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1028, 131 S. Ct. 3043,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 861,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4621.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 429 Fed. Appx. 208.


text:
    No. 10-10574.
    Nizamuddin Chowdhury, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1028, 131 S. Ct. 3043,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 861,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4785.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 639 F.3d 583.


text:
    No. 10-10577.
    Luis Alberto Placencia-Marquez, aka Luis Moreno-Marquez, aka Jose Luis Lopes, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1028, 131 S. Ct. 3044,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 861,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4711.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 412 Fed. Appx. 675.


text:
    No. 10-10578.
    Jose Luis Nunez-Luna, aka Jose Luis Nunez, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1028, 131 S. Ct. 3044,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 861,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4761.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 417 Fed. Appx. 392.


text:
    No. 10-10579.
    Anselmo Gomez, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1028, 131 S. Ct. 3044,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 861,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4735.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 10-10582.
    Bernard Tocholke, Petitioner v. Wisconsin.
    564 U.S. 1028, 131 S. Ct. 3044,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 861,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4591.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 413 Fed. Appx. 889.


text:
    No. 10-10584.
    Darrell Turner, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1028, 131 S. Ct. 3050,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 862,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4706.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 10-10585.
    Jackson Bryant Baugus, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1028, 131 S. Ct. 3044,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 862,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4633.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 10-10587.
    Randy A. Albertson, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1028, 131 S. Ct. 3045,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 862,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4725.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 645 F.3d 191.


text:
    No. 10-10588.
    Fredie Antonio Flores-Prieto, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1028, 131 S. Ct. 3045,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 862,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4598.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 417 Fed. Appx. 393.


text:
    No. 10-10590.
    Edgar Ramos, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1028, 131 S. Ct. 3045,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 862,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4779.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.

Same case below, 629 F.3d 60.


text:
    No. 10-10593.
    Charles Ellwood Gwathney, Petitioner v. J. Ziegler, Warden.
    564 U.S. 1028, 131 S. Ct. 3045,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 862,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4754.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 404 Fed. Appx. 733.


text:
    No. 10-10594.
    Porfirio Hernandez, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1028, 131 S. Ct. 3045,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 862,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4650.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 10-10595.
    Reynold Gelin, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1028, 131 S. Ct. 3046,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 862,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4687.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 419 Fed. Appx. 313.


text:
    No. 10-10597.
    Celio Ramos Guizar, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1029, 131 S. Ct. 3046,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 862,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4717.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 405 Fed. Appx. 98.


text:
    No. 10-10598.
    Carmine Graziano, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1029, 131 S. Ct. 3046,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 863,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4603.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 391 Fed. Appx. 965.


text:
    No. 10-10600.
    Billy G. Harris, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1029, 131 S. Ct. 3047,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 863,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4776.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 391 Fed. Appx. 740.


text:
    No. 10-10601.
    Christopher Reginald Hines, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1029, 131 S. Ct. 3046,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 863,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4625,
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 381 Fed. Appx. 306.


text:
    No. 10-10602.
    James E. Gambrell, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1029, 131 S. Ct. 3047,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 863,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4596.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 10-10603.
    Jerome Harris, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1029, 131 S. Ct. 3046,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 863,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4604.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 10-10609.
    Jason Renard Walker, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1029, 131 S. Ct. 3047,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 863,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4683.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 417 Fed. Appx. 384.


text:
    No. 10-10610.
    Justin Eugene Taylor, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1029, 131 S. Ct. 3047,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 863,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4624.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 10-10613.
    David Llamas-Gonzales, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1029, 131 S. Ct. 3047,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 863,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4783.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 414 Fed. Appx. 936.


text:
    No. 10-10615.
    Martin Armando Reyes-Bueno, aka Martin A. Reyes, aka Martin Reyes, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1029, 131 S. Ct. 3047,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 864,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4641.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 417 Fed. Appx. 391.


text:
    No. 10-10617.
    Joshua P. Randolph, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1029, 131 S. Ct. 3048,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 864,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4707.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 628 F.3d 1022.


text:
    No. 10-10621.
    Carlos Santana Morris, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1029, 131 S. Ct. 3048,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 864,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4757.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 406 Fed. Appx. 758.


text:
    No. 10-10628.
    Antoine D. Cooper, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1029, 131 S. Ct. 3048,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 864,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4782.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.

Same case below, 12 A.3d 1172.


text:
    No. 10-10635.
    Shaun Carter, aka Shawa Carter, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1029, 131 S. Ct. 3048,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 864,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4637.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 411 Fed. Appx. 375.


text:
    No. 10-10639.
    Lazelle Maxwell, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1029, 131 S. Ct. 3048,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 864,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4755.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 415 Fed. Appx. 692.


text:
    No. 10-491.
    L-3 Communications Corporation, et al., Petitioners v. Honeywell International Inc., et al.
    564 U.S. 1029, 131 S. Ct. 3021,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 864,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4631.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 609 F.3d 1292.


text:
    No. 10-1030.
    Kelmer Da Silva Neves, Petitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General.
    564 U.S. 1030, 131 S. Ct. 3025,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 864,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4661.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 613 F.3d 30.


text:
    No. 10-1059.
    Yankton Sioux Tribe, et al., Petitioners v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, et al.
    564 U.S. 1030, 131 S. Ct. 3026,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 865,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4638.
    June 20, 2011.
   Motion of Southern Missouri Recycling and Waste Management District for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 606 F.3d 895.


text:
    No. 10-1068.
    ACORN, et al., Petitioners v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1030, 131 S. Ct. 3026,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 865,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4732.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 618 F.3d 125.


text:
    No. 10-7085.
    Eric D. Strother, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1030, 131 S. Ct. 3021,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 865,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4659.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 384 Fed. Appx. 539.


text:
    No. 10-9360.
    Graydon Earl Comstock, Jr. and Thomas Matherly, Petitioners v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1030, 131 S. Ct. 3026,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 865,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4673.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 627 F.3d 513.


text:
    No. 10-10068.
    Patrick S. McPherron, Petitioner v. Phillip Dailing, et al.
    564 U.S. 1030, 131 S. Ct. 3033,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 865,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4692,
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari before judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 10-10133.
    Shawntrail J. Lee, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1030, 131 S. Ct. 3036,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 865,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4595.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 631 F.3d 1343.


text:
    No. 10-10481.
    Jermol Chin, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1030, 131 S. Ct. 3040,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 866,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4786.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 412 Fed. Appx. 628.


text:
    No. 10-10515.
    John F. Reap, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1030, 131 S. Ct. 3040,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 866,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4714.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 391 Fed. Appx. 99.


text:
    No. 10-10608.
    Donald Edward Beaty, Petitioner v. Arizona.
    564 U.S. 1015, 131 S. Ct. 3050,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 866,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4775.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Superior Court of Arizona, Maricopa County, dismissed as moot.


text:
    No. 10-10643.
    Rafi Wali McCall, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1031, 131 S. Ct. 3048,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 866,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4676.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 419 Fed. Appx. 454.


text:
    No. 10-10747.
    In re Jerry L. Cary, Sr., Petitioner.
    564 U.S. 1017, 131 S. Ct. 3049,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 866,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4723.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of ha-beas corpus denied.


text:
    No. 10-10271.
    In re Ellis Keyes, Petitioner.
    564 U.S. 1017, 131 S. Ct. 3038,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 866,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4606.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of mandamus denied.


text:
    No. 10-9998.
    In re Shirley Remmert, Petitioner.
    564 U.S. 1017, 131 S. Ct. 3030,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 866,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4675.
    June 20, 2011.
   Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of mandamus dismissed. See Rule 39.8.


text:
    No. 10-10576.
    In re Benjamin J. Wherry, Sr., Petitioner.
    564 U.S. 1018, 131 S. Ct. 3044,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 866,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4726.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition denied.


text:
    No. 10-941.
    Derrick O’Neal Mason, Petitioner v. Kim T. Thomas, Interim Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections.
    564 U.S. 1031, 131 S. Ct. 3050,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 867,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4658.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 563 U.S. 960, 131 S. Ct. 2175, 179 L. Ed. 2d 935, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 3206.


text:
    No. 10-1082.
    Jewel D. Hill, Petitioner v. Nisaa N. Muwwakkil.
    564 U.S. 1031, 131 S. Ct. 3051,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 867,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4649.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 563 U.S. 937, 131 S. Ct. 2117, 179 L. Ed. 2d 894, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 3077.


text:
    No. 10-8284.
    Azim Waleed Epps, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1031, 131 S. Ct. 3051,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 867,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4728.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 1241, 131 S. Ct. 1526, 179 L. Ed. 2d 344, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 1688.


text:
    No. 10-8691.
    Billy Driver, Petitioner v. Tim V. Virga, Acting Warden, et al.
    564 U.S. 1031, 131 S. Ct. 3051,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 867,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4734.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 563 U.S. 909, 131 S. Ct. 1794, 179 L. Ed. 2d 663, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 2430.


text:
    No. 10-8950.
    James A. Hinchliffe, Petitioner v. Option One Mortgage Corporation.
    564 U.S. 1031, 131 S. Ct. 3051,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 867,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4585.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 1299, 131 S. Ct. 1707, 179 L. Ed. 2d 638, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 2156.


text:
    No. 10-9055.
    Louis D. Cosco, Petitioner v. Robert O. Lampert, Director, Wyoming Department of Corrections, et al.
    564 U.S. 1031, 131 S. Ct. 3051,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 867,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4582.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 563 U.S. 910, 131 S. Ct. 1798, 179 L. Ed. 2d 666, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 2478.


text:
    No. 10-9088.
    Michael Baker, Petitioner v. Marcus Hardy, Warden.
    564 U.S. 1031, 131 S. Ct. 3051,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 867,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4569.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 563 U.S. 923, 131 S. Ct. 1827, 179 L. Ed. 2d 783, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 2754.


text:
    No. 10-9113.
    Dominic Antonucci, Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1031, 131 S. Ct. 3051,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 868,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4581.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 563 U.S. 911, 131 S. Ct. 1800, 179 L. Ed. 2d 667, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 2543.


text:
    No. 10-9117.
    Kenneth Hunt, Petitioner v. Harold Smith, et al.
    564 U.S. 1031, 131 S. Ct. 3051,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 868,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4574.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 563 U.S. 963, 131 S. Ct. 2154, 179 L. Ed. 2d 940, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 3328.


text:
    No. 10-9150.
    Eddie Wagner Martin, Jr., Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.
    564 U.S. 1031, 131 S. Ct. 3052,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 868,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4578.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 563 U.S. 964, 131 S. Ct. 2157, 179 L. Ed. 2d 941, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 3292.


text:
    No. 10-9384.
    Ismail Shabazz, Petitioner v. Edwin G. Buss, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.
    564 U.S. 1031, 131 S. Ct. 3052,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 868,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4573.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 563 U.S. 948, 131 S. Ct. 2145, 179 L. Ed. 2d 913, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 2898.


text:
    No. 10-9569.
    Ronald Hill, Petitioner v. Ohio.
    564 U.S. 1031, 131 S. Ct. 3052,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 868,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4572.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 563 U.S. 966, 131 S. Ct. 2163, 179 L. Ed. 2d 945, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 3233.


text:
    No. 10-9581.
    Gary Flute, Sr., Petitioner v. United States.
    564 U.S. 1031, 131 S. Ct. 3052,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 868,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4570.
    June 20, 2011.
   Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 563 U.S. 953, 131 S. Ct. 2135, 179 L. Ed. 2d 922, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 2963.


text:
    No. D-2588.
    In the Matter of Discipline of David Robert Osborne.
    564 U.S. 1015, 131 S. Ct. 3052,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 868,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4568.
    June 20, 2011.
   David Robert Osborne, of Christiansted, St. Croix, Virgin Islands, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.


text:
    No. D-2589.
    In the Matter of Discipline of Steven Boyd Alderman.
    564 U.S. 1016, 131 S. Ct. 3052,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 869,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4584.
    June 20, 2011.
   Steven Boyd Alderman, of Syracuse, New York, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.


text:
    No. D-2590.
    In the Matter of Discipline of Ruth Marie Pollack.
    564 U.S. 1016, 131 S. Ct. 3052,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 869,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4571.
    June 20, 2011.
   Ruth Marie Pollack, of Riverhead, New York, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.


text:
    No. D-2591.
    In the Matter of Discipline of Stephen J. Jones.
    564 U.S. 1016, 131 S. Ct. 3053,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 869,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4583.
    June 20, 2011.
   Stephen J. Jones, of Wichita, Kansas, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.


text:
    No. D-2592.
    In the Matter of Discipline of James Michael Kordell.
    564 U.S. 1016, 131 S. Ct. 3053,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 869,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4586.
    June 20, 2011.
   James Michael Kordell, of Woodlake, California, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.


text:
    No. D-2593.
    In the Matter of Discipline of F. Richard Losey.
    564 U.S. 1016, 131 S. Ct. 3053,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 869,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4580.
    June 20, 2011.
   F. Richard Losey, of San Rafael, California, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.


text:
    No. D-2594.
    In the Matter of Discipline of Barry Stephen Tabachnick.
    564 U.S. 1016, 131 S. Ct. 3053,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 869,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4577.
    June 20, 2011.
   Barry Stephen Tabach-nick, of Folsom, California, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.


text:
    No. D-2595.
    In the Matter of Discipline of Merl Alan Whitebook.
    564 U.S. 1016, 131 S. Ct. 3053,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 869,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4579.
    June 20, 2011.
   Merl Alan Whitebook, of Tulsa, Oklahoma, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.


text:
    No. D-2596.
    In the Matter of Discipline of Robert J. Pleshaw.
    564 U.S. 1017, 131 S. Ct. 3054,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 870,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4576.
    June 20, 2011.
   Robert J. Pleshaw, of Washington, District of Columbia, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.


text:
    No. D-2597.
    In the Matter of Discipline of Zoilo I. Silva.
    564 U.S. 1017, 131 S. Ct. 3054,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 870,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4575.
    June 20, 2011.
   Zoilo I. Silva, of New York, New York, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.


text:
    No. 10A1246.
    Milton Wuzael Mathis, Applicant v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.
    564 U.S. 1031, 131 S. Ct. 3054,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 870,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4788.
    June 21, 2011.
   Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Scalia, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Application for a certificate of appealability, presented to Justice Scalia, and by him referred to the Court, denied.


text:
    No. 10-11102 (10A1247).
    In re Milton W. Mathis, Petitioner.
    564 U.S. 1031, 131 S. Ct. 3054,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 870,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4787.
    June 21, 2011.
   Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Scalia, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.


text:
    No. 10-11101 (10A1245).
    Milton Wuzael Mathis, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.
    564 U.S. 1032, 131 S. Ct. 3054,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 870,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4789.
    June 21, 2011.
   Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Scalia, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.


text:
    No. 10-11194 (10A1268).
    Roy Willard Blankenship, Petitioner v. Brian Owens, Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections, et al.
    564 U.S. 1032, 131 S. Ct. 3054,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 870,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4796.
    June 23, 2011.
   Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Thomas, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Georgia, Fulton County, denied.


text:
    No. 10-11195 (10A1269).
    Roy Willard Blankenship, Petitioner v. Carl Humphrey, Warden.
    564 U.S. 1032, 131 S. Ct. 3055,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 871,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 4797.
    June 23, 2011.
   Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Thomas, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Georgia, Butts County, denied.


author: Per Curiam. Justice Breyer,

text:
    [564 U.S. 940]
    HUMBERTO LEAL GARCIA, aka HUMBERTO LEAL, Petitioner v TEXAS IN RE HUMBERTO LEAL GARCIA, Petitioner HUMBERTO LEAL GARCIA, Petitioner v RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
    (No. 11-5001 (11A1))
    (No. 11-5002 (11A2))
    (No. 11-5081 (11A21))
    564 U.S. 940, 131 S. Ct. 2866,
    180 L. Ed. 2d 872,
    2011 U.S. LEXIS 5019
    Decided July 7, 2011.
   OPINION OF THE COURT

[564 U.S. 940]

Per Curiam.

Petitioner Humberto Leal Garcia (Leal) is a Mexican national who has lived in the United States since before the age of two. In 1994, he kidnaped 16-year-old Adria Sauceda, raped her with a large stick, and bludgeoned her to death with a piece of asphalt. He was convicted of murder and sentenced to death by a Texas court. He now seeks a stay

[564 U.S. 941]

of execution on the ground that his conviction was obtained in violation of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (Vienna Convention), Apr. 24, 1963, 21 U.S.T. 77, T.I.A.S. No. 6820. He relies on Case Concerning Avena and Other Mexican Nationals (Mex. v. U. S.), 2004 I. C. J. 12 (Judgt. of Mar. 31), in which the International Court of Justice (ICJ) held that the United States had violated the Vienna Convention by failing to notify him of his right to consular assistance. His argument is foreclosed by Medellin v. Texas, 552 U.S. 491, 128 S. Ct. 1346, 170 L. Ed. 2d 190 (2008) (Medellin I), in which we held that neither the Avena decision nor the President’s memorandum purporting to implement that decision constituted directly enforceable federal law. 552 U.S., at 498-499, 128 S. Ct. 1346, 170 L. Ed. 2d 190.

Leal and the United States ask us to stay the execution so that Congress may consider whether to enact legislation implementing the Avena decision. Leal contends that the Due Process Clause prohibits Texas from executing him while such legislation is under consideration. This argument is meritless. The Due Process Clause does not prohibit a State from carrying out a lawful judgment in light of unenacted legislation that might someday authorize a collateral attack on that judgment.

The United States does not endorse Leal’s due process claim. Instead, it asks us to stay the execution until January 2012 in support of our “future jurisdiction to review the judgment in a proceeding” under this yet-to-be-enacted legislation. Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 2-3, n. 1. It relies on the fact that on June 14, 2011, Senator Patrick Leahy introduced implementing legislation in the Senate with the Executive Branch’s support. No implementing legislation has been introduced in the House.

We reject this suggestion. First, we are doubtful that it is ever appropriate to stay a lower court judgment in light of unenacted legislation. Our task is to rule on what the law is, not what it might eventually be. In light of Medellin I, it is clear that there is no “fair prospect that a majority of

[564 U.S. 942]

the Court will conclude that the decision below was erroneous,” O’Brien v. O’Laughlin, 557 U.S. 1301, 1302, 130 S. Ct. 5, 174 L. Ed. 2d 602 (2009) (Breyer, J., in chambers), and our task should be at an end. Neither the United States nor Justice Breyer, post, at 943, 180 L. Ed. 2d, at 876 (dissenting opinion), cites a single instance in this Court’s history in which a stay issued under analogous circumstances.

Even if there were circumstances under which a stay could issue in light of proposed legislation, this action would not present them. Medellín himself sought a stay of execution on the ground that Congress might enact implementing legislation. We denied his stay application, explaining that “Congress has not progressed beyond the bare introduction of a bill in the four years since the ICJ ruling and the four months since our ruling in [Medellín I]” Medellín v. Texas, 554 U.S. 759, 760, 129 S. Ct. 360, 171 L. Ed. 2d 833 (2008) (per curiam) (Medellín II). It has now been seven years since the ICJ ruling and three years since our decision in Medellín I, making a stay based on the bare introduction of a bill in a single house of Congress even less justified. If a statute implementing Avena had genuinely been a priority for the political branches, it would have been enacted by now.

The United States and Justice Breyer complain of the grave international consequences that will follow from Leal’s execution. Post, at 946, 180 L. Ed. 2d, at 877. Congress evidently did not find these consequences sufficiently grave to prompt its enactment of implementing legislation, and we will follow the law as written by Congress. We have no authority to stay an execution in light of an “appeal of the President,” post, at 947, 180 L. Ed. 2d, at 878, presenting free-ranging assertions of foreign policy consequences, when those assertions come unaccompanied by a persuasive legal claim.

Finally, we noted in Medellin II that “ [t]he beginning premise for any stay . . . must be that petitioner’s confession was obtained unlawfully,” and that “ [t]he United States has not wavered in its position that petitioner was not prejudiced

[564 U.S. 943]

by his lack of consular access.” 554 U.S., at 760, 129 S. Ct. 360, 171 L. Ed. 2d 833. Here, the United States studiously refuses to argue that Leal was prejudiced by the Vienna Convention violation, contending instead that the Court should issue a stay simply in light of the possibility that Leal might be able to bring a Vienna Convention claim in federal court, regardless of whether his conviction will be found to be invalid. We decline to follow the United States’ suggestion of granting a stay to allow Leal to bring a claim based on hypothetical legislation when it cannot even bring itself to say that his attempt to overturn his conviction has any prospect of success. We may note that in a portion of its opinion vacated by the Fifth Circuit on procedural grounds, the District Court found that any violation of the Vienna Convention would have been harmless. Leal v. Quarterman, 2007 WL 4521519, *7 (WD Tex., Dec. 17, 2007), vacated in part sub nom. Leal Garcia v. Quarterman, 573 F.3d 214, 224-225 (2009).

The applications for stay of execution presented to Justice Scalia and by him referred to the Court are denied. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied.

It is so ordered.

SEPARATE OPINION

Justice Breyer,

with whom Justice Ginsburg, Justice Sotomayor, and Justice Kagan join, dissenting.

The petitioner, Humberto Leal Garcia (Leal), convicted 16 years ago of capital murder, is scheduled to be executed this evening. He asks this Court to stay his execution pending resolution of his petitions for writs of certiorari and habeas corpus. I would grant the applications and stay the execution.

As the Solicitor General points out, Leal’s execution at this time “would place the United States in irreparable breach” of its “obligation [s]” under international law. Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 1 (hereinafter U. S. Brief); see also

[564 U.S. 944]

id., at 11-13, 26, 30. The United States has signed and ratified the Vienna Convention, a treaty under which the United States has promised, among other things, to inform an arrested foreign national, such as Leal, that he has a right to request the assistance of his country’s consulate. Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (Vienna Convention), Art. 36, Apr. 24, 1963, 21 U.S.T. 77, 100-101, T.I.A.S. No. 6820. The United States has also signed and ratified an optional protocol, a treaty in which the United States agrees that “[d]isputes arising out of the interpretation of application of the Convention shall lie within the compulsory jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice.” Optional Protocol Concerning the Compulsory Settlement of Disputes (Optional Protocol), Art. I, Apr. 24, 1963, 21 U.S.T. 325, 326, T.I.A.S. No. 6820. Although the United States has since given notice of withdrawal from the Optional Protocol, see Letter from Condoleezza Rice, Secretary of State, to Kofi A. Annan, Secretary-General of the United Nations (Mar. 7, 2005), that withdrawal does not alter the binding status of its prewithdrawal obligations, see U. S. Brief 22, n. 4.

When officials of the State of Texas arrested Leal, they failed to inform him of his Vienna Convention rights, thereby placing the United States in violation of its obligations under that Convention. And so far neither Texas nor any other judicial authority has implemented what the International Court of Justice found (in a related case brought by the Government of Mexico) to be the proper remedy for that Convention violation, namely, a hearing to determine whether that violation amounted in effect to harmless error. Case Concerning Avena and Other Mexican Nationals (Mex. v. U. S.), 2004 I. C. J. 12, 61-64. (Judgt. of Mar. 31). See also U. S. Brief 15 (explaining that “President Bush acknowledged the international legal obligation created by Avena”). In other words, the international court made clear that Leal is entitled to a certain procedure, namely, a hearing. That

[564 U.S. 945]

being so, a domestic court’s guesses as to the results of that procedure are, as far as our treaty obligations are concerned, irrelevant.

This Court subsequently held that, because Congress had. not embodied our international legal obligations in a statute, the Court lacked the power to enforce those obligations as a matter of domestic law. Medellín v. Texas, 552 U.S. 491, 525-526, 128 S. Ct. 1346, 170 L. Ed. 2d 190 (2008) (“The responsibility for transforming an international obligation arising from a non-self-executing treaty into domestic law falls to Congress”). And the Court later refused to grant a stay of execution in a similar case in significant part because “the President . . . has [not] represented to us that there is any likelihood of congressional . . . action.” Medellín v. Texas, 554 U.S. 759, 759-760, 129 S. Ct. 360, 171 L. Ed. 2d 833 (2008) (per curiam).

But these applications for stay do not suffer from this last mentioned legal defect. The Solicitor General has filed an amicus brief in which he states that “after extensive consultation with the Department of State and the Department of Justice,” Senator Patrick Leahy, the chairman of the Senate Committee on the Judiciary, has introduced (and expressed an intention to hold speedy hearings on) a bill that would permit Leal and other similarly situated individuals to obtain the hearing that international law requires. U. S. Brief 8; see id., at 8-9, 12-13 (describing the Consular Notification Compliance Act of 2011, S. 1194, 112th Cong., 1st Sess.). The amicus brief indicates that “congressional . . . action” is a reasonable possibility. Medellín, 554 U.S., at 760, 129 S. Ct. 360, 171 L. Ed. 2d 833. And the Solicitor General urges this Court to grant a stay, providing Congress with adequate time to carry out the legal responsibility that this Court has held belongs to the Legislative Branch, Medellín, 552 U.S., at 525-526, 128 S. Ct. 1346, 170 L. Ed. 2d 190, namely, the enactment of a law that will bring the United States into compliance with its treaty obligations and provide Leal with the hearing that those obligations legally demand. U. S. Brief 2.

[564 U.S. 946]

At the same time, the Solicitor General sets forth strong reasons, related to the conduct of foreign affairs, for granting a stay. Representing the Executive Branch (hence the President), the Solicitor General tells us that “ [petitioner's execution would cause irreparable harm” to “foreign-policy interests of the highest order.” Id., at 11. The Solicitor General says that failing to halt Leal’s execution would place “the United States in irremediable breach of its international-law obligation,” with

“serious repercussions for United States foreign relations, law-enforcement and other cooperation with Mexico, and the ability of American citizens traveling abroad to have the benefits of consular assistance in the event of detention.” Id., at 12.

These statements are supported by the fact that the Government of Mexico has also filed a brief in which it states that declining to stay Leal’s imminent execution

“would seriously jeopardize the ability of the Government of Mexico to continue working collaboratively with the United States on a number of joint ventures, including extraditions, mutual judicial assistance, and our efforts to strengthen our common border.” Brief for United Mexican States as Amicus Curiae 23 (internal quotation marks omitted).

This Court has described interests of the kind set forth by the Solicitor General as “plainly compelling.” Medellín, 552 U.S., at 524, 128 S. Ct. 1346, 170 L. Ed. 2d 190; id., at 537, 128 S. Ct. 1346, 170 L. Ed. 2d 190 (Stevens, J., concurring in judgment); see also id., at 566, 128 S. Ct. 1346, 170 L. Ed. 2d 190 (Breyer, J., dissenting) (observing harms that would flow from noncompliance). The Court has long recognized the President’s special constitutionally based authority in matters of foreign relations. See, e.g., United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp., 299 U.S. 304, 320, 57 S. Ct. 216, 81 L. Ed. 255 (1936). And it has ordinarily given his views significant weight in such matters. Jama v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, 543 U.S. 335, 348, 125 S. Ct. 694, 160 L. Ed. 2d 708 (2005) (noting the

[564 U.S. 947]

Court’s “customary policy of deference to the President in matters of foreign affairs”). It should do so here.

Finally, this Court has adequate legal authority to grant the requested stay. Should Senator Leahy’s bill become law by the end of September (when we would consider the petition in the ordinary course), this Court would almost certainly grant the petitions for writs of certiorari, vacate the judgment below, and remand the cases for further proceedings consistent with that law. Indeed, were the Solicitor General to indicate at that time that the bill was about to become law, I believe it likely that we would hold the petitions for at least several weeks until the bill was enacted and then do the same. And this Court, under the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651, can take appropriate action to preserve its “potential jurisdiction.” FTC v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 603, 86 S. Ct. 1738, 16 L. Ed. 2d 802 (1966).

Thus, on the one hand, international legal obligations, related foreign policy considerations, the prospect of legislation, and the consequent injustice involved should that legislation, coming too late for Leal, help others in identical circumstances all favor granting a stay. And issuing a brief stay until the end of September, when the Court could consider this matter in the ordinary course, would put Congress on clear notice that it must act quickly. On the other hand, the State has an interest in proceeding with an immediate execution. But it is difficult to see how the State’s interest in the immediate execution of an individual convicted of capital murder 16 years ago can outweigh the considerations that support additional delay, perhaps only until the end of the summer.

Consequently I would grant the stay that the petitioner requests. In reaching its contrary conclusion, the Court ignores the appeal of the President in a matter related to foreign affairs, it substitutes its own views about the likelihood of congressional action for the views of Executive Branch officials who have consulted with Members of Congress, and

it denies the request by four Members of the Court to delay the execution until the Court can discuss the matter at Conference in September. In my view, the Court is wrong in each respect.

I respectfully dissent.

       The United States’ motion for leave to file an amicus brief is granted.