text:
    No. 873.
    Colozzo v. United States.

      Irving Younger for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


source: Caselaw Access Project

license: Public Domain

text:
    No. 885.
    Brauer et al. v. City of Cleveland.

      Henry DuLaurence and Paul H. Oppmann for petitioners. Daniel- J. O’Loughlin for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 893.
    Snyder Brothers Co. v. United States.

      Furman Smith and Kirk McAlpin for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Rogovin and Harold C. Wilkenfeld for the United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 985.
    Neuhoff Bros. Packers, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board.
    ■ Fritz L. .Lyne for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, Norton J. Come and Eugene B, Grano j for respondent.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 899.
    Ohio ex rel. Sibarco Corp. et al. v. City of Berea et al.

      Sanford W. Likover for petitioners. George I. Meis'el for respondents.
   Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 903.
    Henry v. United States.

      Morris Lavine for petitioner. Solid-, tor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 909.
    Limperis, Trustee in Bankruptcy v. A. J. Armstrong Co., Inc.

      William S. Collen for petitioner. Norman H. Nachman and Joseph Stein for respondent.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 937.
    Brown et al. v. Sterling Aluminum Products Corp.

      Jerome J. Duff for petitioners. Daniel Bartlett and William Stix for' respondent. '
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 946.
    Woody et al. v. Sterling Aluminum Products, Inc., et al.

      Jerome J. Duff for petitioners^ Daniel Bartlett and William Stix for Sterling Aluminum Products, Inc., and Donald S. Siegel for' International Association of Machinists et al., respondents.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 987.
    Porter et al. v. Porter.

      Daniel Cracchiolo and Frank W, Beer

    for petitioners.
   Sup. Ct. Ariz. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 951.
    Collins v. Government of the Virgin Islands of the United States et al.

      Melvin M. Belli for petitioner. Francisco Comeiro, Attorney General, for respondent Government of the Virgin Islands.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 969.
    Keco Industries, Inc. v. United States.

      Franklin M. Schultz and Paul W. Steer for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.
   Ct. Cl. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 974.
    Kraft et ux., dba National Art Academy v. Board of Education of the District of Columbia.

      John R. Foley for petitioners. Charles T. Duncan, Müton D. Korman and Hubert B. Pair for respondent.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 979.
    Smith v. California.

      Duane B. Beeson for petitioner.
   Super. Ct. Cal., County of Marin. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 986.
    Southern Pacific Co. v. Dupont et al.

      J. J. Davidson, Jr., for petitioner.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 988.
    Pshemensky v. California.

      Al Matthews for petitioner.
   Dist. Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 992.
    Ginsberg v. United States.

      Neal Rutledge and Allan Milledge for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Rogovin and Meyer Rothwacks for the United States.
   Sup. Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 991.
    Estate of Schildkraut et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

      George C. Wildermuth for petitioners. Solicitor General Marshall] Assistant Attorney General Rogovin and Harry Baum for respondent.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 994.
    Borrowdale v. Reuland.

      Milton 0. Gordon for petitioner. Charles B. Mahin and Joseph Keig for respondent.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1006.
    Muhammad et al. v. United States et al.

      Edward W. Jocko, Jr., for petitioners. Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1008.
    National Maritime Union of America, AFL-CIO, et al. v. National Labor Relations Board.

      Abraham E. Freedman for petitioners. Solicitor General Marshall, Arnold Ord-man, Dominick L. Manoli and Norton J. Come for respondent.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1018.
    Bryan et al., dba Trakwork Equipment Co. v. Kershaw Manufacturing Co.

      Howard J. Marsh for petitioners. Edward E.Crowell, Jr., for respondent.
   C. A. 5th Cir.' Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1021.
    Mooreman, Trustee in Bankruptcy v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New York.

      William P. Mahoney, Jr., for petitioner. Arthur Kaiser for respondent.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1020.
    Magbanua v. Immigration and Naturalization Service.

      Melvyn E. Stein for petitioner. Solicitor. General Marshall for respondent.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari, denied.


text:
    No. 1053.
    Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. General Tire & Rubber Co. et al.

      Edward S. Irons for petitioner... Charles J. Merriam and Norman P. Ramsey for respondent General Tire & Rubber Co.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 860.
    Brotherhood of Sleeping Car Porters v. Thompson.

      Ernest Fleischman for petitioner. Taylor B. Rion for respondent. Edward J. Hickey, Jr., and William J. Hickey for Railway Labor Executives’ Association, as amicus curiae, in support of the petition.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Motion of Railway Labor Executives’ Association for leave to file a brief, as amicus curiae, granted. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 881.
    Francolino v. United States.

      William Soneh-shine for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Julia P. Cooper for the United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the . opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 977.
    Watkins v. United States.

      Richard E. Gorman for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Julia P." Cooper for the United States.'
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. -

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should'be granted.


text:
    No. 1030.
    Hinton v. United States.

      Harold Dunbar Cooley for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


author: MR. Justice Black,

text:
    No. 928.
    Temple v. United States.

      John W. Hinsdale for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

MR. Justice Black,

with whom Mr. Justice Douglas joins,

dissenting.

Under 18 U. S. C. §401 (1) a court may punish as contempt “[mjisbehavior of any person in its presence or so. near thereto as to obstruct the administration of justice.” We held in In re Michael, 326 U. S. 224, that this contempt power, limited as Congress intended it to be, could not be used to punish a person merely for committing perjury in the court’s presence without the additional showing that an actual obstruction of justice was caused thereby. Accord, Ex parte Hudgings, 249 U. S. 378; see In re McConnell, 370 U. S. 230, 234, 236; cf. Cammer v. United States, 350 U. S. 399; Brown v. United States, 356 U. S. 148, 153.

Petitioner, an. attorney, represented a plaintiff Li a lawsuit‘against the Government in federal district court. When he failed to file a brief within the time specified by the court’s pretrial order, the Government moved to dismiss his- client’s complaint for want of. prosecution. The District Judge refused to do so upon petitioner’s representation in his belated brief and in open court that the delay was due to illness on his part. The court went on to hear the case on its merits and, after a trial which lasted only an hour, rendered judgment for the Government. A year later, petitioner was charged with contempt of court under § 401 (1) for having misrepresented to the judge that he was ill-. Tried summarily by that same judge without a jury, petitioner was convicted and sentenced to six months’ imprisonment. Though the Court of Appeals reversed and remanded for a new trial on grounds not here material, it flatly held, with little discussion and no citation to authority, that “[l]ying to a judge is certainly misbehavior in the court’s presence and therefore punishable under section 401.” 349 F. 2d 116, 117. Petitioner was retried summarily before a different judge and again convicted of contempt of court, apparently oh the basis of the Court of Appeals’ prior holding that “lying to a judge” in and of itself constitutes contempt.

Since there is nothing in this record to suggest that either the Government attempted, to prove or the trial judge found that' petitioner’s misrepresentation actually obstructed the administration of justice, his conviction on its face runs counter to In re Michael '. There is not a vestige of evidence to support it. Cf. Thompson v. Louisville, 362 U. S. 199. Nevertheless, the Court of Appeals refused to reverse this illegal conviction and dismissed petitioner’s appeal on the ground that, while he gave an oral notice of appeal and filed an appeal bond at the end of his trial, he did not file a written notice of appeal within the 10-day period specified by Fed. Rule Crim. Proc. 37 (a)(2). Although only four days after that period expired petitioner moved the trial court to accept a written notice of appeaj, and although the trial court then found that petitioner’s delay, was the result of “excusable neglect,” the Court of Appeals refused to hold the oral notice adequate. The court noted that the result might be different had this case arisen under the 1966 amendment to Rule 37 (a)(2) which now provides that “[u]pon a showing of excusable neglect, the district court may, before or after the time has expired, . . . extend the time for filing the notice of appeal otherwise allowed to any party for a period not to exceed 30 days .. . .” 383 U. S. 1110-1111. The court also refrained from deciding “that an oral notice of appeal transcribed into the record would never be sufficient to invoke jurisdiction in the court of appeals.” Yet the court allowed a plainly invalid conviction to stand. Because I believe that the Court of Appeals, in the words of Fallen v. United States, 378 U. S. 139, 142, “[overlooked . .. the fact that the Rules are not, and were not intended*to be, a rigid code to have an inflexible meaning irrespective of the circumstances”' and because I find it “apparent when the circumstances of this case are examined” that “the’ Rules were not approached with sympathy for their purpose,” I would grant certiorari in this case to correct a clear miscarriage of justice. Cf. Berman v. United States, 378 U. S. 530 (dissenting opinion).


text:
    No. 1000.
    Pacific Inland Navigation Co. v. Course.

      Floyd A. Fredrickson for petitioner. Stephen M. King for respondent. Thomas J. ■ White and William F. White for Columbia River Towboat Association, as amicus curiae, in support of the petition.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of Columbia River Towboat Association for leave to file a brief, as amicus curiae, granted. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1007.
    Locklin et al., dba Radiant Color Co. v. Switzer Brothers, Inc.

      Carl Hoppe for petitioners. Benjamin H. Sherman for respondent.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Motion to use. record in No. 803, October Term, 1961, granted. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1035.
    Paley v. Brenner et al.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall for respondents.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Motion J;o dispense with printing petition granted. Cer-tiorari denied.-


text:
    No. 1009.
    Western Natural Gas. Co. v. Cities Service Gas Co.

      E. Barrett Prettyman,. Jr., Carroll L. Gilliam and Clair John Killoran for petitioner. Charles V. Wheeler and Rodney G. Buckles for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Del. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 456,
    Mise.
    Trotter v. Bishop, Penitentiary Superintendent.

      George Howard, Jr., for petitioner. Bruce Bennett, Attorney General of Arkansas, and Jack L. Lessenberry for
    respondent.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 457,
    Mise.
    Harris v. Bishop, Penitentiary Superintendent.

      George Howard, Jr., for petitioner. Bruce Bennett, Attorney General of Arkansas, and Jack L. Lessenberry for respondent.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 579,
    Mise.
    House et al. v. Illinois.

      Gerald W. Getty, Marshall Hartman and James J. Doherty for petitioners. William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, for respondent;
   App.. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 791,
    Mise.
    Harris v. Bishop, Penitentiary Superintendent.

      Wm. I. Purifoy for petitioner. Joe Purcell, Attorney General of Arkansas, and Jack L. Lessenberry for respondent.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No 879,
    Mise.
    Harris v. Bishop, Penitentiary Superintendent.

      Wm. I. Purifoy for petitioner. Joe Purcell, Attorney General of Arkansas, and Jack L. Lessenberry for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Ark. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 919,
    Mise.
    Davis v. United States.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Ronald L. Gainer for the United States.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari' denied.


text:
    No. 937,
    Mise.
    Lacey v. Wainwright, Corrections Director.
    Petitioner pro se. Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and Wallace E. Allbritton, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 994,
    Mise.
    Murphy v. New Jersey et al.
    Petitioner pro se. Raymond R. Trombadore, Deputy Attorney General of New Jersey, for respondents.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1065,
    Mise.
    Brown v. United States.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.
   Ct. Cl. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1164,
    Mise.
    Thomas v. Holman, Warden.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1165,
    Mise.
    Ames v. Myers, Correctional Superintendent.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1169,
    Mise.
    Schmidt v. Iowa.

      Paul D. Lunde for petitioner.
   Sup. Ct. Iowa. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1171,
    Mise.
    Simpson v. Wisconsin.
   Sup. Ct. Wis. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1172,
    Mise.
    Isaacs v. Virginia.
   Sup. Ct. App. Va. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1173,
    Mise.
    Calhoun et al. v. Hertwig, Trustee in Bankruptcy, et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1177,
    Mise.
    Demers v. Shehab et al.
   Sup. Ct. R. I. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1181,
    Mise.
    Kopetka v. Tahash, Warden.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1183,
    Mise.
    Edwards v. United States.
    Petitioner-pro se, Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. Maysack for the United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1185,
    Mise.
    Boulware v. North Carolina.
   Sup. Ct. N. C. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1186,
    Mise.
    Miller v. California.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1187,
    Mise.
    Chance v. Arizona.
   Ct. App. Ariz. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1189,
    Mise.
    Weathers v. United States.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson .and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1191,
    Mise.
    Nailor v. California.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1192,
    Mise.
    Hoy v. Nevada.
   Sup. Ct. Nev. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1196,
    Mise.
    Ames v. Middlebrooks, Warden.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1197,
    Mise.
    Hacker v. Kansas.
   Sup. Ct. Kan. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1201,
    Mise.
    Conde v. California.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1203,
    Mise.
    Losieau v. Nebraska.
   Sup. Ct. Neb. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1204,
    Mise.
    Ferro v. Wilson, Warden, et al.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1205,
    Mise.
    Cox v. Beto, Corrections Director.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1207,
    Mise.
    Hurley v. United States.
    Petitioner.pro se. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Jerome M. Feit for the United States.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1211,
    Mise.
    Goodpaster v. Illinois.
   Sup. Ct. Ill. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1214,
    Mise.
    Schack v. Katzenbach.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson,' Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. Maysack for respondent.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1215,
    Mise.
    Perry v. Kentucky.
   Ct. App. Ky. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1222,
    Mise.
    Arguello v. California.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1225,
    Mise.
    Daniels v. United States.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Anthony P. Nugent, Jr., for the United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1226,
    Mise.-
    Noyes v. Washington.
   Sup. Ct. Wash. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1227,
    Mise.
    Santos v. Wilson, Warden, et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1231,
    Mise.
    Glass v. United States.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. Maysack for the United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1236,
    Mise:
    Villarino v. California.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1238,
    Mise.
    Simon v. Texas.
   Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1241,
    Mise.
    Lawrence v. Peyton, Penitentiary Superintendent.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 68.
    No. 69.
    No. 70.
    No. 71.
    No. 747.
    No. 820.
    No. 846.
    No. 2,
    No. 21,
    No. 210,
    No. 511,
    No. 963,
    No. 1016,
    No. 1057,
    No. 1089,
    No. 1118,
    Spencer v. Texas, Bell v. Texas, Reed v. Beto, Corrections Director, Zuckerman et al. v. Greason, Sheridan Creations, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, Patterson et al. v. City of Newport News et al., Kansas City Transit, Inc. v. Kansas City, Missouri, Goodspeed v. Beto, Corrections Director, Taylor v. Texas, Collins v. Wilson, Warden, Collier v. United States, Risch v. Risch, Jacobs v. United States, Reed v. California, Johnson v. Department of Correction et al., Stell v. Pennsylvania,
    Mise.
    Mise.
    Mise.
    Mise.
    Mise.
    Mise.
    Mise.
    Mise.
    Mise.’
   385 U. S. 554;

385 U. S. 554;

385 U. S. 554;

ante, p. 15;

385 U. S. 1005;

385 U. S. 650;

385 U. S. 1036;

ante, p. 926;

ante, p. 927;

385 U. S. 808;

385 U. S. 1042;

ante, p. 10;

ante, p. 920;

ante, p. 923;

ante, p. 924; and

ante, p. 925. Petitions for rehearing denied.


text:
    No. 483.
    Reitman et al. v. Mulkey et al.

      Marshall W. Krause on the motion.

      Abe F. Levy on the motion.

      Gerald D. Marcus op the motion.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. (Certiorari granted, 385 U. S. 967.)

Motion of American Civil Liberties Union of Northérn California for leave to file a brief, as amicus curiae, granted.

Motion of United Automobile, Aerospace «fe Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW), AFL-CIO, Region 6, et al., for leave to file a brief, as amici curiae, granted.

Motion of California State Central Committee of the Democratic Party for leave to file a brief, as amicus curiae, granted.


text:
    No. 1360,
    Mise.
    Barcley v. Kropp, Warden.
   Motion for leave to file petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.


text:
    No. 905,
    Mise;
    Whitney v. Florida.
    Petitioner pro se. Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and James T. Carlisle, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 3d Dist. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Case transferred to appellate docket.


text:
    No. 876.
    Krohn v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc.

      Lowe Watkins and Dan E. McGugin for petitioner. John K. Maddin, Jr., for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Tenn. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 930.
    Aadal v. United States.

      Jerome Lewis for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Ronald L. Gainer for the United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1010.
    Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. Ledbetter.

      Francis B. Burch, Attorney General of Maryland, and R. Randolph Victor for petitioner.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1016.
    Frazier et al. v. United States.
    . Charles Norman Shaffer for petitioners. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Rogovin and Joseph M. Howard for the United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1023.
    Exchange & Savings Bank of Berlin v. United States.

      John S. McDaniel, Jr., for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Rogovin and Robert N. Anderson for the United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1025.
    Naples v. Maxwell, Warden.

      Dan W. Duffy for petitioner. William B. SaxbeAttorney General of Ohio, Donald M. Colasurd, First Assistant Attorney General, and Leo J. Conway, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent’
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1031.
    Spigner v. United States.

      Burton Marks for petitioner. . Solicitor General^ Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1069.
    Fred Olsen Line et al. v. Curry, Administratrix.

      Graydon S. Staring for petitioners. William A. Lahanier for respondent.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1123.
    Kelly, Administrator v. Chabot.
   Sup. Ct. Ill. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1081.
    Visidor Corp. v. Borough of Cliffside Park.

      Louis Eisenstein and Frederick L. Bernstein for petitioner. Paul L. Basile for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. N. J. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1013.
    Worley et al. v. Illinois.

      Julius Lucius Echeles for petitioners.
   Sup. Ct. Ill. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1096.
    Daddona et al. v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Stamford.

      Samuel Gruber for petitioners. Theodore Godlin for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Conn. Certiorari denied.


author: Mr. Justice Douglas,

text:
    No. 1012.
    Mitchell v. United States.

      Robert L. Bobrick for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas,

dissenting.

Petitioner did not report for induction as ordered, was indicted, convicted, and sentenced to five years’ imprisonment and his conviction was affirmed. 369 F. 2d 323. His defense was that.the “war” in Vietnam was being conducted in violation of various treaties to which we were a signatory, especially the Treaty of London of August 8, 1945, 59 Stat. 1544, which in Article 6 (a) declares that “waging of a.war of aggression” is a “crime against peace” imposing “individual responsibility.” Article 8 provides:

“The fact that the Defendant acted pursuant to order of his Government or of a superior shall not free him from responsibility, but may be considered in mitigation of punishment if the Tribunal determines that justice so .requires.”

Petitioner claimed that the “war” in Vietnam was a “war of- aggression” within the meaning of the Treaty of London and that Article 8 makes him responsible for participating in it even though he is ordered to do so.

Mr. Justice Jackson, the United States prosecutor at Nuremberg, stated: “If certain acts in violation of treaties are crimes, - they are crimes whether the United States does them or whether Germany does them, and we are not prepared to lay down a rule of criminal conduct against others which we would not be willing to have invoked against us.” (International Conference on Military Trials, Dept. of State Pub. No. 3080, p; 330.)

Article VI, cl. 2, of the Constitution states that “Treaties” are a part of the “supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby.”

There is a considerable body of opinion that our actions in Vietnam constitute the waging of an aggressive “war.”-

This case presents the questions:

(1) whether the Treaty of London, is a treaty within the meaning of Art. VI, cl. 2;

(2) whether the question as to the waging of an aggressive “war” is in the context of this criminal prosecution a justiciable question;

(3) whether the Vietnam episode is a “war” in the sense of the Treaty;

(4) whether petitioner, has standing to raise the question;

(5) whether, if he has, the Treaty may be tendered as a defense in this criminal case or in amelioration of the punishment.

These are extremely sensitive-and delicate questions. But they should, I think, be answered. Even those who think that the Nuremberg judgments were unconstitutional by our guarantee relating to ex post facto laws would have to take a different view of the Treaty of London that purports to lay down a standard of future conduct for all the signatories.

I intimate no opinion on the merits. But I think the petition for certiorari should be granted. Wé have here a. recurring question in present-day Selective Service cases.

      The trial court charged the jury that the Treaty of London did not interfere “in any manner in respect to this defendant fulfilling his duty under this order.”


text:
    No. 1029.
    Conren, Inc., dba Great Scot Supermarket v. National Labor Relations Board.

      William, E. Roberts for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli and Norton J. Come for respondent.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Stewart is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 356,
    Mise.
    Ornales v. Florida.
    Petitioner pro se. Earl Fair cloth, Attorney General of Florida, and James G. Mahorner, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 769,
    Mise.
    Munich v. United States.

      S. Carter McMorris for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Marshall Tamor Golding for the United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 914,
    Mise.
    Lovejoy et al. v. United States.

      Leon B. Polsky for petitioners. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Kirby W. Patterson for the United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 763,
    Mise.
    Sterling v. United States.

      Leon B. Polsky for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Anthony P. Nugent, Jr., for the United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 666,
    Mise.'
    Cornelio v. Metropolitan District Council et al.

      Joseph N. Bongiovanni, Jr., for petitioner. M. H. Goldstein for respondents.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1027.
    Thomas v. United States.

      Newton B. Schwartz for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas,

dissenting.

I would grant this petition on the fourth question. It concerns the apparent practice of Internal Revenue agents in examining taxpayers and using the evidence obtained in criminal prosecutions when the taxpayers are given no warning as-to their rights, including the right to have an attorney present. This is not an in-custody case, but it is a coercive examination of a taxpayer at a critical preliminary hearing, so to speak, and the question presented apparently is a recurring one.


text:
    No. 933,
    Mise.
    Brooks v. Beto, Corrections Director.

      William VanDercreek for petitioner. Crawford C. Martin, Attorney General of Texas, George M. Cowden, First Assistant Attorney General, and- R. L. Lattimore, Howard M. Fender, Robert E. Owen and Lonny F. Zwiener, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied,


text:
    No. 915,
    Mise.
    Harden v. New York.
   App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 2d Jud. Dept. Certiefrari denied.


text:
    No. 1023,
    Mise.
    Wallace v. United States.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1120,
    Mise.
    Greene v. United States.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Mervyn Hamburg for the United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1152,
    Mise.
    Deltenre v. New Mexico.

      Thomas F. McKenna for petitioner. Boston E. Witt, Attorney General of "New Mexico, and 'Myles E. Flint and Paul J. Lacy, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. N. M. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1168,
    Mise.
    Anderson v. United States.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1202,
    Mise.
    Downey v. Virginia.

      Joseph L. Lyle, Jr., for petitioner.
   Sup. Ct. App. Va. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1234,
    Mise.
    Reese v. United States.
    Petitioner pro se. :Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Philip R. Monahan for the United States.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1235,
    Mise.
    Sturm v. California Adult Authority et al.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1237,
    Mise.
    Roberts v. United California Bank et al.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall for respondent United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1253,
    Mise.
    Sykes v. United States.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1256,
    Mise.
    Schack v. Hoover, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1264,
    Mise.
    Knoll et al. v. Socony Mobil Oil Co., Inc., et al.

      Robert H. Reiter for petitioners. Emmet A. Blaes for respondents Jones et al.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1268,
    Mise.
    Deaton v. United States.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1301,
    Mise.
    Williams v. Donovan, Deputy Commissioner, Department of Labor, et al.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall for respondent Donovan.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1327,
    Mise.
    Gaito v. Strauss et al.
    Petitioner pro se. Maurice Louik and Francis A. Barry for respondents.
   C. A. 3d Cir, Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 703.
    No. 793.
    No. 862.
    No. 870.
    No. 871.
    No. 890,
    No. 1037,
    No. 1046,
    No. 1093,
    No. 1110,
    No. 1116,
    Fred Meyer, Inc., et al. v. Federal Trade Commission, Fein v. New York, Magnus v. United States, Curtis et al. v. Boeger, Warden, Grand et al. v. Boeger, Warden, Bennett v. North Carolina, Clemons v. United States, McCreary v. Wilson, Warden, Skolnick v. Parsons, U. S. District Judge, et al., Pierson v. New Jersey, Lee v. Kansas,
    Mise.
    Mise.
    Mise.
    Mise.
    Mise.
    Mise.
   ante, p. 908;

385 U. S. 649;

ante, p. 909 ;

ante, p. 914;

ante, p. 914;

385 U. S. 1018;

ante, p. 921;

ante, p. 922;

ante, p. 903;

ante, p. 924; and

ante, p. 925. Petitions for rehearing denied.


text:
    No. 894,
    Mise.
    Williams v. California Department of Corrections et al.,
   385 U. S. 986. Motion for leave to file petition for rehearing denied.


text:
    March 24, 1967.
    No. 25.
    United States v. Arnold, Schwinn & Co. et al.

      Harold D. Burgess and Robert' C. Keck for Arnold, Schwinn & Co., and Earl E. Pollock and Michael M. Lyons for Schwinn Cycle Distributors Association, on the motion.
    [For earlier orders herein, see 382 U. S. 936, 384 U. S. 901.]
   D. C. N. D. Ill. Motion of counsel for appellees for postponement of argument and for extension of time for filing of appellees’ briefs denied.


text:
    No. 9,
    Orig.
    United States v. Louisiana et al.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Louis F. Claiborne, Roger P. Marquis and George S. Swarth for the United States.
    [For earlier actions, see, e. g., 364 U» S 502,3S2 U. S. 288.]
   On consideration of the motion of the United States for entry of a supplemental decree declaring that the United States is entitled to certain submerged lands of the Gulf of Mexico and enjoining- the State of Texas from interfering therewith, and for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction to enjoin the State of Texas from leasing or otherwise interfering with said submerged lands pending determination of the title thereto; and

It appearing from said motion and attached affidavit . that the State of Texas has announced its intention to offer said lands for mineral leasing on April 4, 1967, and that such leasing may violate this Court’s injunction of December 12, 1960, and subject to unlawful exploitation mineral resources to which the United States makes claim under that decree,

It is hereby ordered:

(1) That within twenty days from the date hereof the State of Texas respond to the motion of the United States and show cause why a preliminary injunction should not be issued as prayed for, pending final determination of the rights of the parties in the premises; and

(2) That the State of Texas be, and it is hereby, restrained from leasing or otherwise interfering with the submerged lands described in the motion of the United States, pending the ruling of the Court on the motion d'f the United States for a preliminary injunction and the response of the State of Texas thereto.

The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.


text:
    March 27, 1967.
    No. 615.
    Berger v. New York.

      John J. McAvoy on the motion.
   Ct. App. N. Y. (Certiorari granted, 385 U. S. 967.) Motion of New York Civil Liberties Union for leave to participate in oral argument, as amicus curiae, denied.


text:
    No. 987,
    No. 1332,
    No. 1338,
    Mise.
    Mise.
    Mise.
    Azzone v. Tahash, Warden; Giffen v. California; and Hodge v. Powers.
   Motions for leave to file petitions for writs of habeas corpus denied.


text:
    No. 846,
    Mise.
    Peters v. New York.

      Robert S. Friedman on the motion.
   Appeal from Ct. App. N. Y. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted and probable jurisdiction noted. Case transferred to appellate docket and set for argument immediately following No. 1139.


text:
    No. 962.
    No. 1056.
    No. 1063.
    Hardin, Mayor of Tazewell, et al. v. Kentucky Utilities Co.; Powell Valley Electric Cooperative v. Kentucky Utilities Co.; and Tennessee Valley Authority v. Kentucky Utilities Co.

      Philip P. Ardery for petitioners in No. 962. Clyde Y. Cridlin for petitioner in No. 1056. Solicitor General■ Marshall and Charles J. McCarthy for petitioner in No. 1063. Squire R. Ogden for respondent, in all three cases. Reported below: 375 F. 2d 403.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari granted. Cases are consolidated and a total of two hours allotted for oral argument.


text:
    No. 954.
    CBN Corp., formerly Columbian Carbon Co. v. United States.

      Robert J. Casey for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Rogovin and Grant W. Wiprud for the United States.
   Ct. Cl. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 957.
    Wissner v. United States.

      Carl L. Shipley and Rufus W. Peckham, Jr., for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.
   Ct. Cl. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1039.
    Van Norman Industries, Inc. v. United States.

      John F. Costelloe for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Rogovin and Gilbert E. Andrews for the United States.
   Ct. Cl. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1042.
    Buonomo v. United States.

      Melvin B. Lewis-for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Mervyn Hamburg for the United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1057.
    Climax Chemical Co. v. C. F. Braun & Co. et al.

      Leroy Jeffers, C. Melvin Neal and Tom W. Neal for petitioner. J. R. Modrall for respondent C. F. Braun & Co., John B. Titt-man for respondents J. T. Thorpe, Inc., et al., and David G. Housman for respondent Heyward-Robins&n Co.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1043.
    Ostendorff v. United States.

      Ernest J. Howard for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Rogovin,and Joseph M. Howard for the United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1044.
    Krantz et al. v. Olin.

      W. Brown Morton, Jr., and H. Hume Mathews for petitioners. Dexter N. Shaw and William M. Epes for respondent.
   C. C. P. A. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1045.
    Sheppard, Administrator, et al. v. United States.

      Stephen M. Feldman and Joseph G. Feldman for petitioners. Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1048.
    Key v. United States.

      G. Edward Friar for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Mervyn Hamburg for the United States.
   C. A, 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1051.
    Union Carbide Corp. v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co.

      Sidney Neuman and Robert L. Austin for petitioner. Frank F. Fowle and E. Manning Giles for respondent.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1066.
    Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission et al. v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co.

      William A. Goichman, Edward Munce and Joseph C. Bruno for petitioners. Hugh B. Cox and Richard R. Bongartz for respondent.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1054.
    Christofalos v. Immigration and Naturalization Service.

      Nathan T. Nothin for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Bea-/ trice Rosenberg for respondent.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied./


text:
    No. 1068.
    Seiferth et al. v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.

      Louis P. Miller for petitioners. Ralph D. Walker for respondent.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1131.
    Peters et al. v. Bounougias.

      Sidney Z. Karasik and Charles Wolff for petitioners.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 959.
    Albergo v. Reading Co.

      James E. Beasley for petitioner. John R. McConnell and William J. Taylor for respondent.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Black would grant the petition for a writ of certiorari and reverse the judgment. Mr. Justice Douglas would grant the petition for a writ of certiorari and reverse the' judgment below on authority of Rogers v. Missouri Pacific R. Co., 352 U. S.

500.


text:
    No. 1024.
    Dillard v. Dillard.

      George W. Mead for petitioner.
   Sup. Ct. Ore. Certio-rari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 996,
    Mise.
    Lee et al. v. Florida.

      Phillip A. Hubbart for petitioners. ' Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and Stanley D. Kupiszewski, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1026.
    Molinas v. Mancusi, Warden.

      Thomas R. Newman for petitioner.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the. opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 1041.
    Nez Perce Tribe of Indians v. United States.

      Donald C. Gormley and Charles A. Hobbs for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Weisl and Roger P. Marquis for the United States.
   Ct. Cl. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Doi/g-las is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 1058.
    Hirshhorn v. New York.

      Osmond K. Fraenkel for petitioner; Frank S. Hogan for respondent.
   App. Term, Sup. Ct. N. Y., 1st Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.

Mr., Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should . be granted.


text:
    No. 857,
    Mise.
    Lupino v. Tahash, Warden.
    Petitioner pro se. Douglas M. Head, Attorney General of Minnesota, and Gerard W. Snell, Acting Solicitor General, for respondent.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 881,
    Mise.
    Alire v. United States.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinsort and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1051.
    Mise.
    Nelson et al. v. Hancock, Warden.

      Richard W. Leonard and. Leo Patrick McGowan for petitioners. George S. Pappagianis, Attorney General of New Hampshire, and William J. O’Neil, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 960,
    Mise.
    Copeland v. Myers, Correctional Superintendent.
    Petitioner pro se. Arlen Specter for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1050,
    Mise.
    Money v. Alabama.
    Petitioner pro se. MacDonald Gallion, Attorney General of Alabama, and John C. Tyson III, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Ala. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1068,
    Mise.
    Burks v. Kentucky.
    Petitioner pro se. Robert Matthews, Attorney General of Kentucky, and John B. Browning, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   Ct. App. Ky. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1167,
    Mise.
    Polisi et al. v. United States.

      Harold Schwartz for petitioners. Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1190,
    Mise.
    West v. McMann, Warden.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1239,
    Mise.
    Von Atzinger v. New Jersey.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1243,
    Mise.
    King v. California.
   Dist. Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1248,
    Mise.
    Haynes v. California.
   Dist. Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1249,
    Mise.
    Wilson v. Oliver, Warden.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1252,
    Mise.
    Hicks v. Illinois.

      John R. Snively for petitioner.
   Sup. Ct. Ill. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1255,
    Mise.
    Gaertner v. Wisconsin.
   Sup. Ct. Wis. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1258,
    Mise.
    McClindon v. Oliver et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1259,
    Mise.
    Ortega v. Johnson, Judge.
   Sup. Ct. Mich. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1263,
    Mise.
    Chandler v. Myers, Correctional Superintendent.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1269,
    Mise.
    Meholchick v. Brierley, Correctional Superintendent.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1270,
    Mise.
    Ramey v. Pennsylvania et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1271,
    Mise.
    Simon v. New York.
   Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1272,
    Mise.
    Lewis v. New Jersey.
   Sup. Ct. N. J. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1286,
    Mise..
    Kanton v. United States.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1290,
    Mise.
    Kelly, aka Shannon v. Chief of Police, Coffeyville Police Dept.
   Sup. Ct. Kan. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1273,
    Mise.
    Seymour v. United States.
    Petitioner pro se: Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Philip R. Monahan for the United States.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 882,
    Mise.
    Comfort v. California.

      Lloyd Mc-Murray for petitioner. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Albert W. Harris; Jr., Assistant Attorney General, and Robert R. Granucci, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
   Municipal Ct. of Oakland-Piedmont, Cal., and/or App. Dept., Super. Ct. Cal., County of Alameda. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted. The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 901,
    Mise.
    Montgomery v. McKendrick, Warden.

      Robert Welch Mullen for petitioner. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, for respondent.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 95.
    No. 926.
    No. 14,
    No. 29,
    No. 414,
    No. 503,
    No. 646,
    Mise.
    Mise.
    Mise.
    Mise.
    Mise.
    Chapman et al. v. California, Bethlehem Steel Co. et al. v. United States, Capuchino v. Texas, Pohlabel v. United States, Milani v. Illinois, MacDonald v. California, Botsch v. United States,
   ante, p. 18;

ante, p. 912;

ante, p. 928;

ante, p. 916;

ante, p. 12;

ante, p. 127; and

ante, p. 937. Petitions for rehearing denied.


text:
    No. 718,
    No. 1074,
    No. 1138,
    No. 1155,
    Mise.
    Mise.
    Mise.
    Mise.
    Gamez v. Texas, Soots et ux. v. Attorney General of the United States, Dukes v. United States, Lewis, aka Ehrlich v. Illinois et al.,
   ante, p. 929;

ante, p. 905;

ante, p. 946; and

ante, p. 938. Petitions for rehearing denied.


text:
    No. 103.
    Cooper v. California,
   ante, p. 58. Petition for rehearing and modification of opinion denied.


text:
    April 4, 1967.
    No. 391,
    Mise.
    Taylor v. United States.

      Elmer B. Gower for petitioner.
    [For earlier order herein, see 385 U. S. 806.]
   C. A. 4th Cir. Petition for writ of certiorari dismissed pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of this Court,


text:
    April 10, 1967.
    No. 89.
    Walker v. Southern Railway Co.

      J. Nat Hamrick on the motion.
    [For earlier actions herein, see 384 U. S. 926, 385 U. S. 196, 1020.]
   C. A. 4th Cir. Motion to recall and amend the judgment of this Court granted. It is ordered that the certified copy of the judgment sent to the District Court be recalled and that the case be remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.


text:
    No. 949.
    Estate of Steinberg v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

      George T. Altman on the motion.
   C. A. 2d Cir. (Certiorari denied, ante, p. 941.) Motion to remand denied.


text:
    No. 9.
    United States v. Sealy, Inc.

      Sigmund Timberg on the motion.
   Appeal from D. C. N. D. Ill. (Probable jurisdiction noted, 382 U. S. 806.) Motion of Serta Associates, Inc., et al., for leave to participate in oral argument, as -amici curiae, denied.


text:
    No. 615.
    Berger v. New York.

      Raymond W. Bergan on the motion.
   Ct. App. N. Y. (Certiorari granted, 385 U. S. 967.) Motion of International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Ware-housemen & Helpers of America for leave to file a brief, as amicus curiae, granted.


text:
    No. 9,
    Mise.
    Rees v. Peyton, Penitentiary Superintendent.
   C. A. 4th Cir. This case is held without action on the petition for certiorari until further order of the Court.


text:
    No. 1356,
    No. 1391,
    Mise.
    Mise.
    Furtak v. Mancusi, Warden; and Woll v. Florida.
   Motions for leave to file petitions for writs of habeas corpus denied.


text:
    No. 1396,
    Mise.
    Meter v. Nebraska.
   Sup. Ct. Neb. Motion for leave to file petition for writ of habeas corpus denied. Treating- the papers submitted as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1329,
    No. 1383,
    Mise.
    Mise.
    Skolnick v. Hoffman, Judge; and Wilcox v. Meier, Warden, et al.
   Motions for leave to file petitions for writs of mandamus and for other relief denied.


text:
    No. 1083.
    United States v. Rands et ux.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Weisl, Roger P. Marquis and A. Donald Mileur for the United States. Sidney Terser for respondents.
   C. A. 9th. Cir. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 1002.
    Brenner, Commissioner of Patents v. Hofstetter.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Sanders and Morton Hollander for petitioner. Paul N. Kokulis and Lawrence A. Hymo for respondent.
   C. C. P. A. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 1032.
    Nash v. Florida Industrial Commission et al.

      Neal Rutledge and Allan Milledge for petitioner. Lawrence Kanzer for Florida Industrial Commission, and Glenn L. Greene, Jr., for Stanley Works et al., respondents.
   Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 3d Dist. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 1036.
    National Labor Relations Board v. Fleetwood Trailer Co., Inc.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli and Norton J. Come for petitioner. Jerome C. Byrne for respondent.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 953.
    Miller v. County of Los Angeles.
    Petitioner pro se. Harold W. Kennedy, Irvin Taplin, Jr., and John D. Cahill for respondent.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1033.
    Daniel v. Skibs A/S Hilda Knudsen et al.

      Harry R. Ko-zart for petitioner. T. E. Byrne, Jr., for respondents.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1055.
    Danning, Trustee in Bankruptcy v. Mintz.

      J. Ronald Trost for petitioner.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 956.
    Bennett, Acting Warden v. Labat et al.

      Jack P, F. Gremillion, Attorney General of Louisiana, William P. Schuler, Second Assistant Attorney General, and John E. Jackson, Jr., and Dorothy D. Wolbrette, Assistant Attorneys General, for petitioner. Peter Hearn, William T. Coleman, Jr., Benjamin E. Smith, G. Wray Gill, Gerard H. Schreiber, Edward Bennett Williams, Melvin L. Wulf and Marvin M. Karpatkin for respondents.
   C, A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1065.
    Myerson, aka Myersohn v. United States.

      Philip J. Ryan for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Rogovin and Joseph M. Howard for the United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1071.
    Farmer v. New Jersey.

      Raymond A. Brown and Irving I. Vogelman for petitioner. J. Norris Harding for respondent.
   Sup. Cfr. N. J. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1072.
    Beltran et al. v. Immigration and Naturalization Service.

      Nathan T. Nothin for petitioners. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for respondent.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1073.
    Colbrese v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co.

      Cale Crowley for petitioner. John M. Sehiltz for respondent.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1077.
    Mallory v. United States.

      Walter LaVon Pride for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Philip R. Monahan for the United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1075.
    Stickler v. Tehan, Sheriff.

      Bernard A. Berkman, Larry S. Gordon and Joshua J. Kancelbaum for petitioner. Melvin G. Rueger and Fred J. Gartolano for respondent.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1076.
    Sine et ux. v. Helland, Director of Highways, et al.
   Sup. Ct. Utah. Certiorari denied.,


text:
    No. 1078.
    Borden Co. v. Freeman, Secretary of Agriculture, et al.

      Earl E. Pollock and William P. Reiss for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Sanders and Alan S. Rosenthal for respondents Freeman et al., and H. Edward Dunkelberger, Jr., Edward J. Grenier, Jr., and Grover C. Richman, Jr., for Campbell Soup Co., intervenor below.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1082.
    Hindes et ux. v. United States.

      Reuben R. Lozano for petitioners. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General.Rogovin and Gilbert E. Andrews for the United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1084.
    Columbia Bank for Cooperatives v. Lee, Trustee in Bankruptcy.

      Edwin P. Gardner for petitioner. James M. Batey, Jr., for respondent.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1086.
    Jordan v. Colorado.

      Carl Feldhamér and Walter L. Gerash for petitioner.
   Sup. Ct. Colo. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1079.
    Lee et al. v. City of Jesup.

      Aaron Kravitch for petitioners..
   Sup. Ct. Ga. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1092.
    Franklin et al. v. McDaniel.
    Reported below: 371 F. 2d 544.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1094.
    Cutler et al. v. American Federation of Musicians of the United States and Canada et al.

      Godjrey P. Schmidt for petitioners. Henry Kaiser and George Kaujmann for respondents.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1099.
    Robinson v. The Atlantic Starling et al.

      Samuel C. Gainsburgh for petitioner. Frank S. Normann for respondents.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1100.
    Government of Guam v. Atkins-Kroll (Guam), Ltd.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Rogo-vin, Harold W. Burnett, Attorney General of Guam, Jack S. Levin, Harold C. Wilkenfeld, Frank J. Barry and Edward Weinberg for petitioner.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1121.
    Esderts, Administratrix v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Co.

      James A. Dooley for petitioner. John M. O’Connor, Jr., and Lawrence Gunnels for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Ill. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 3,
    Mise.
    Dunning v. Mississippi.
    Petitioner pro se. Joe T. Patterson, Attorney General of Mississippi, and Delos H. Burks, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Miss. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 790,
    Mise.
    Woods v. Georgia.

      Charles Morgan, Jr., for petitioner. Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General of Georgia, G. Ernest Tidwell, Executive Assistant Attorney General, and A. Joseph Nardone, Jr., Deputy Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Ga. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 818,
    Mise.
    Merrill v. United States.

      David R. Lewis for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Mervyn Hamburg for the United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 961,
    Mise.
    Matthews v. United States.

      Thomas W. Hathaway for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. Maysack for the United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1031,
    Mise.
    O’Day v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.,


text:
    No. 1032,
    Mise.
    Hewitt v. Beto, Corrections Director.
    Petitioner pro se. Crawford C. Martin, Attorney General of Texas, George M. Cowden, First Assistant Attorney General, R. L. Lattimore and Gilbert J. Pena, Assistant Attorneys General, and A. J. Carubbi, Jr., for respondent.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1035,
    Mise.
    Wakaksan v. United States.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1070,
    Mise.
    Clifton v. United States.

      Donald L. Hardison for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Mervyn Hamburg for the Uftited States.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1121,
    Mise.
    Gentille v. Florida.

      Arthur J. England for petitioner. Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and Wallace E. Allbritton, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 3d Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1145,
    Mise.
    Bright v. Rhay, Penitentiary Superintendent.
    Petitioner pro se. John J. O’Connell, Attorney General of Washington, and Paul J. Murphy, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Wash. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1209,
    Mise.
    Petite v. United States.

      James J. Laughlin for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Julia P. Cooper.for the United States.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1210,
    Mise.
    Pittman v. United States.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1217,
    Mise.
    Forrest v. United States.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Mervyn Hamburg for the United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 538,
    Mise.
    Pritchett v. Florida.
    Petitioner pro se. Earl Fair cloth, Attorney General of Florida, and George R. Georgieff, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1257,
    Mise.
    Stein v. Wirtz, Secretary of Labor, et al.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall for respondent Wirtz.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1075,
    Mise.
    Caballero v. New Jersey.
    Petitioner pro se. John G. Thevos for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. N. J. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1223,
    Mise.
    Arnold v. McGuiness.
   C. A.. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1228,
    Mise.
    Belvin v. Wilson, Warden, et al.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1240,
    Mise.
    Fair v. Dekle, Supervisor of Voter Registration, et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1250,
    Mise.
    Brokaw v. United States.
    Petitioner pro se. ’ Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1251,
    Mise.
    La Brasca v. California.

      S. Carter McMorris for petitioner.
   Super. Ct. Cal., County of Sacramento. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1265,
    Mise.
    Davis v. Warden, Maryland House of Correction.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1261,
    Mise.
    O’Day v. United States.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied


text:
    No. 1266,
    Mise.
    Williams v. United States.

      William M. Ryan for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1275,
    Mise.
    Banks v. United States.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1280,
    Mise.
    Jackson v. United States.

      Leon B. Polsky for petitioner.' Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1284,
    Mise.
    Keller v. Simpson, Warden.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari' denied.


text:
    No. 1287,
    Mise.
    Stiltner v. Washington et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1289,
    Mise.
    Merneigh v. Dutton, Warden.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1292,
    Mise.
    Van Geldern v. Oliver, Warden.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1291,
    Mise.'
    Loux v. Washington.
    Petitioner pro se. James E. Kennedy for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Wash. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1293,
    Mise.
    Best v. Fay, Warden.

      Anthony F. Marra for petitioner.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1294,
    Mise.
    Lyle v. Maroney, Correctional Superintendent, et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1297,
    Mise.
    Dillenburg v. Maxwell, Reformatory Superintendent.
   Sup. Ct. .Wash. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1303,
    Mise.
    Castillo, v. Director of the Department of Corrections et al.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1307,
    Mise.
    Erving et al. v. Nebraska.

      Richard J. Bruckner for petitioners. Clarence A. H. Meyer, Attorney General of Nebraska, and Melvin Kent Kammerlohr, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Neb. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1325,
    Mise.
    Levine et al. v. Colgate-Palmolive Co. et al.
    Petitioners pro se. Paul W. Williams for respondents.
   Sup. Ct. N. Y., New York County. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1310,
    Mise.
    Price v. Allgood, Warden.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1306,
    Mise.
    Calloway v. Ohio et al.
   O. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1076,
    Mise.
    Bjornsen v. LaVallee, Warden.

      Leon B. Polsky for petitioner.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. o

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 1312,
    Misc.
    In re Disbarment of Rhodes.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1316,
    Misc.
    Jung v. Wisconsin.
   Sup. Ct. Wis. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1321,
    Misc.
    Warriner v. Doug Tower, Inc., et al.
    Petitioner pro se. Ira C. Haycock for respondents Jaensch et al.
   Sup. Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied:


text:
    No. 1330,
    Misc.
    Miller v. United States.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1331,
    Misc.
    Farmer v. Pate, Warden.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1593,
    Misc.
    Mitchell v. Wilson, Warden.

      Evander Cade Smith and Doris Brin Walker for petitioner.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1581,
    Misc.
    Mitchell v. California.
   Sup. Ct. Cal.

Application for stay of execution presented to Mr. Justice Douglas, and by him referred to the Court, denied.

Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 235.
    No. 791.
    No. 933.
    Kilgarlin et al. v. Hill, Secretary of State of Texas, et al., Wallerstein et al. v. Federal Communications Commission, China Union Lines, Ltd. v. A. O. Andersen & Co. et al.,
   ante, p. 120;

ante, p. 908; and

ante, p. 933. Petitions for rehearing denied.


text:
    No. 934.
    No. 945.
    No. 948.
    No. 960.
    No. 973.
    No. 992.
    No. 15,
    No. 684,
    No. 1176,
    No. 1180,
    No. 1231,
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Lan Jing-Chau et al. v. A. O. Andersen & Co. et al., Hickey et al. v. Illinois Central Railroad Co., Duke v. United States, Allen, Executrix, et al. v. Mathiasen’s Tanker Industries, Inc., et al., Brasch v. Superior Court of California in and for the City and County of San Francisco, Ginsberg v. United States, Hillery v. California, Phillips et vir v. California, Sandoval v. California, Nielsen v. Nebraska State Bar Association, Glass v. United States,
   ante, p. 933;

ante, p. 934;

ante, p. 934;

ante, p. 932;

ante, p. 943;

ante, p. 958;

ante, p. 938;

ante, p. 212;

ante, p. 948;

ante, p. 266; and

ante, p. 968. Petitions for rehearing denied.


text:
    No. 868.
    Smith v. Industrial Accident Commission of California et al.,
   ante, p. 915. Motion for leave to file petition for rehearing denied.


text:
    April 13, 1967.
    No. 31.
    United States v. National Steel Corp. et al.

      Solicitor General Marshall for the United States. . Denman Moody, C. Brien Dillon and E. W. Barnett for National Steel Corp. et' al., and B. J. Bradshaw for Brown et al., appellees.
    [For earlier orders herein, see 383 U.. S. 905, ante, p. 939.]
   Appeal from D. C. S. D. Tex. Appeal dismissed pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of this Court.


text:
    April 17, 1967.
    No. -.
    Caddo Parish School Board et al. v. United States et al.

      Jack P. F. Gremillion, Attorney General of Louisiana, William P. Schuler, Second Assistant Attorney General, Albin P. Lassiter and John, F. Ward, Jr., on. the motion. Solicitor General Marshall and Assistant Attorney General Doar for the United States, and Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III, Michael Meltsner, Norman C. Amaker, Charles H. Jones, Jr., Oscar Adams and Demetrius C. Newton for Johnson et al., respondents, in opposition to the motion.
   Motion for stays of execution and enforcement of judgments of the United States District Courts for the Eastern and Western Districts of Louisiana entered pursuant to the mandates of'the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, presented to Mr. Justice Black, and by him referred to the Court, denied.


text:
    No. ——.
    Roberts v. Wilson, Warden.
   Super. Ct. Cal., City and County of S. F. Application for stay of execution of the death sentence imposed upon petitioner, presented to Mr. Justice Douglas, and by him referred to the Court, • denied;

Mr. Justice Fortas is of the opinion that the application for stay should be granted.


text:
    No. 30,
    Original.
    Michigan v. Ohio.

      Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General of Michigan, Robert A. DerengosUi, Solicitor General, and Nicholas V. Olds and Esther E. Newton, Assistant Attorneys General, on the ■ motion. William B. Saxbe, Attorney General of Ohio, and Charles S. Lopeman for defendant in opposition.'
   Motion for leave to file a bill of complaint granted and State of Ohio allowed sixty days to answer.


text:
    No. 23.
    United States et al. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. et al.

      Walter R. McDonald on the motion.
    [For earlier actions herein, see 383 U. S. 964, 384 U. S. 888.]
   Appeal from D. C. S. D. Cal. Motion of Southern Governors’ Conference et al., for leave to file a brief, as amici curiae, granted.


text:
    No. 1119.
    Banks v. Chicago Grain Trimmers Association, Inc., et al.
   O. A. 7th Cir. The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief expressing the views of the United States.


text:
    No. 1439,
    Misc.
    Smith v. Wilson, Warden.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Motion for leave to file petition for writ of habeas corpus' denied. Treating the papers submitted as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1313,
    Misc.
    Boles v. Burnett, Chief Justice, Supreme Court of Tennessee, et al.
    Petitioner pro se. Clyde W. Key for Bank of Knoxville, complainant below, in opposition to the motion.
   Motion for leave to'file petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition denied.


text:
    No. 1359,
    Misc.
    Skolnick v. Robson, U. S. District Judge.
   Motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus and other relief denied.


text:
    No. 1613,
    Misc.
    Ali, aka Clay, et al. v. Gordon, U. S. District Judge.

      Hayden C. Covington on the motion.
   Application for stay and other relief, as well as petition for order staying the, orders of the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky and for injunction pending appeal, presented to Mr. Justice Stewart, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus denied.


text:
    No. 1352,
    Misc.
    Jackson v. District Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District.
   Motion for leave to file petition for writ of maildamus denied.


text:
    No. 668.
    Federal Trade Commission v. Flotill Products, Inc., et al.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro and James Mcl. Henderson for petitioner. William Simon, John Bodner, Jr., and Jefferson E. Peyser for respondents.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 1070.
    Bloom v. Illinois.

      Anthony Bradley Eben for petitioner. Edward J. Hladis for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Ill. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 1141,
    Misc.
    Harris v. United States.

      Paul H. Weinstein for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Julia P. Cooper for the United States.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and certiorari granted.. Case transferred to appellate docket.


text:
    No. 1097.
    Moody v. United States.

      Lucius E. Burch, Jr., and Tom Mitchell, Jr., for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Rogovin, Joseph M. Howard and John P. Burke for the United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir, Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 982.
    County of Los Angeles et al. v. Montrose Chemical Corp. of California.

      Harold W. Kennedy and John Geyer Tausig for petitioners. James J. Arditto for respondent. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, J'ohn J. Klee, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, and James E. Sabine and Ernest P. Goodman, Assistant Attorneys General, for the State, of California, as amicus curiae, in support of the petition.
   Dist. Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1101.
    Evanson et al. v. Northwest Holding Co.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1107.
    Rizzo et al. v. United States.
    Petitioners pro se. Solicitor General Marshall and Assistant Attorney General Rogovin for the United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir, Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1108.
    Chambersburg Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Commission.

      Harry J. Daly for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall and Henry Getter for respondent.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1111.
    Korn v. United States.

      Rufus W. Peckham, Jr., and Carl L. Shipley for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall for the United States. .
   Ct. Cl. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1127.
    Southern Brokerage Co. v. Cannarsa.

      William F. Billings for petitioner. Spencer C. Relyea III and Frank M. Rybum, Jr., for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Tex, and/or Ct. Civ. App. Tex,, 6th Sup. Jud. Dist. Certiorari • denied.


author: Mr. Justice Black,

text:
    No. 981.
    Felber v. Association of the Bar of the City of New York.

      Philip J. Ryan for petitioner. John G. Bonomi for respondent.
   App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 1st Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Black,

with whom Mr. Justice Douglas joins, dissenting.

Petitioner, a lawyer, was automatically disbarred in 1941 solely on the basis of a trial court’s conviction for larceny and forgery. This conviction was held void and set aside by an appellate court which finally ended the criminal case. After dismissal of the criminal case, peti-tionér movéd for reinstatement to the Bar. The matter was referred to' a referee, who, relying on the same testimony which the appellate court held could not legally support petitioner’s conviction, denied reinstatement. In so doing, the referee expressly noted that petitioner had the burden of proving that he was morally fit for readmission to the Bar, although'the burden of proof would have been on the Bar in making an original charge against a lawyer. The Appellate Division accepted the referee’s recommendation, and' the Court of Appeals denied petitioner permission to appeal on the ground that the judgment lacked “finality.” On .three subsequent .occasions petitioner again moved for reinstate- • ment, but .each time was turned down by the Appellate Division without an opinion and denied permission to appeal by .the Court of Appeals on the ground of no “final judgment,” although it has disbarred him for 25 years. On the last occasion petitioner presented the state courts with the constitutional issues which he now urges this Court to review and decide in his favor.

For over 25 years petitioner has been unable to pursue his vocation because of a void criminal conviction, a manifest distortion of justice. The question presented is whether the State, having disbarred petitioner automatically on the basis of a conviction for crime subsequently voided, can perpetuate his disbarment on the básis of the identical evidence offered to convict him. There are at least two reasons why the State should not be allowed to do this. First, the moment petitioners conviction was reversed, his continued disbarment was supported by absolutely no evidence. This was a clear deprivation of due process of law and made the disbarment at that time as void as the criminal, conviction. Konigsberg v. State Bar, 353 U. S. 252; see Thompson v. City of Louisville, 362 U. S. 199. Second, it is no answer to suggest, as does respondent, that this denial of due process was somehow remedied when the referee, after a hearing, denied petitioner’s motion for reinstatement. This shifted to petitioner the burden to. prove his innocence, because in New York there is apparently a tremendous difference between defending a disbarment charge and prosecuting a motion for reinstatement to the Bar. Where the Bar prosecutes for disbarment, the burden of proof is on the Bar Association; but where, as here, the lawyer asks reinstatement, the burden of proof is on him. Moreover, when a lawyer is initially disbarred, he may appeal the Appellate Division’s decision to the Court of Appeals; but when a lawyer’s motion for reinstatement is denied, the Court of Appeals is without jurisdiction to hear an appeal because the denial is not a “final judgment.” Thus, for 25 years (long enough one would think to be final) the Court of Appeals has refused to review the orders denying petitioner readmissión to the Bar. There may. be valid reasons for fastening greater procedural burdens on a disbarred lawyer seeking reinstatement than on a lawyer defending a disbarment action. But where the differ- • ence in status, as here, is solely attributable to a void conviction for crime, the difference in treatment is itself violative of equal protection and further aggravates the initial deprivation of due process, a disbarment based on no evidence.

For these reasons I dissent from the denial of certiorari in this case.


text:
    No. 1113.
    Bata v. Central-Penn National Bank of Philadelphia et al.

      Harold E. Stassen and A. Evans Kephart for petitioner. Robert MacCrate and Lewis H. Van Dusen, Jr., for respondent Bata.
   Sup. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1125.
    Tsakonites v. Transpacific Carriers Corp. et al.

      Isaac Salem, for petitioner. John R. Sheneman for respondents. Arthur J. Mandell for American Trial Lawyers Association, as amicus curiae, in support of the petition.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1126.
    Washington v. Golden State Mutual Life Insurance Co.

      Robert W. Hainsworth for petitioner. Finis E. Cowan for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Tex. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1145.
    Sligh v. Columbia, Newberry & Laurens Railroad Co.

      George M. Lee, Jr., for petitioner. H. Simmons Tate, Jr., for respondent.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1091.
    Ogletree et al. v. Ohio.

      James R. Willis for petitioners. John T. Corrigan and Lloyd O. Brown for respondent.
   Ct. App. Ohio, Cuyahoga County. Certiorari denied.

The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Fortas are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.

The following petitions for writs of certiorari áre denied. The Chief Justice, Mb. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Fqrtas are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 123,
    Misc.
    Nettles v. Illinois.

      Louis P. Yangas for petitioner. William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Ill.


text:
    No. 158,
    Misc.
    Smith v. United States.

      John W. Karr for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Donald I. Bierman for the United States.
   C. A. D. C. Cir.


text:
    No. 245,
    Misc.
    White v. New York.

      Gretchen White Oberman for petitioner. Frank S. Hogrn for respondent.
   Ct. App. N. Y.


text:
    No. 275,
    Misc.
    Smith v. Ohio.

      James R. Willis for petitioner. John T. Corrigan and John T. Patton for respondent.
   Ct. App. Ohio, Cuyahoga County.


text:
    No. 279,
    Misc.
    Clifton v. Texas.

      Robert B. Billings for petitioner. Henry Wade and Wilson Johnston for respondent.
   Ct. Crim. App. Tex.


text:
    No. 741,
    Misc.
    Acosta v. Texas.

      Clyde W. Woódy and Mariam, S. Rosen for petitioner. Crawford C. Martin, Attorney General of Texas, George M. Cowden, First Assistant Attorney. General, R. L. Lattimore, Howard M. Fender and Lonny F. Zwie-ner, Assistant Attorneys General, and A. J. Cambbi, Jr., for respondent.
   Ct. Crim. App. Tex.


text:
    No. 829,
    Misc.
    Fluellyn v. New York.
    Petitioner pro se. Thomas J. Mackell for respondent.
   App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 2d Jud. Dept.


text:
    No. 1299,
    Mise.
    Jones v. Peyton, Penitentiary Superintendent.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1162.
    Merlands Club, Inc. v. Messall et al.

      William F. Hickey for petitioner.
   Ct. .App. Md. Certiorari denied..


text:
    No. 1176.
    Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co. v. Pritchard, Administratrix.

      Bethuel M. Webster, Donald J. Cohn, William H. Eckert, Frank L. Seamans and John H. Morgan for petitioner. James E. McLaughlin for respondent.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 325,
    Misc.
    Freeman v. Illinois.

      Sam Adam, Charles B. Evins and R. Eugene Pincham for petitioner.
   Sup. Ct. Ill. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 864,
    Misc.
    Gaito v. Pennsylvania.
    Petitioner pro se. Robert W. Duggan for respondent.
   Super. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1004,
    Misc.
    Jacquez v. Wilson, Warden.
    Petitioner pro se. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Albert W. Harris, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, and Gloria F. DeHart, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1119,
    Misc.
    Rowell v. United States.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. Maysack for the United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1282,
    Misc.
    Chestnut et al. v. New York.

      Eleanor Jackson Piel for petitioners.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied..


text:
    No. 1105,
    Misc.
    Darmiento et al. v. California.

      Luke McKissack for petitioners. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney-General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and Philip C. Griffin, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
   Dist. Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1092,
    Misc.
    Pearson v. California.
    Petitioner pro se. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and Jack K. Weber, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
   Dist. Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1163,
    Misc.
    Buckley v. United States.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Philip R. Monahan for the United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1216,
    Misc.
    Williams v. United States et al.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States et al.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1218,
    Misc.
    Rosado v. United States.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Marshall Tamor Golding for the United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1244,
    Misc.
    Smith v. United States.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1302,
    Misc.
    Turner v. New York.
   Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1314,
    Misc.
    Hatter v. Sale et al.

      Johnnie A. Jones for petitioner.
   Sup. Ct. La. and/or Ct. App. La., 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1315,
    Misc.
    Wilson v. New York.
   App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 2d Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1318,
    Misc.
    LeBrun v. Oregon.
    Petitioner pro se. Jacob B. Tanzer for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Ore. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1323,
    Misc.
    Allen v. Turner, Warden.
   Sup. Ct. Utah. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1324,
    Misc.
    Oppenheim et al. v. Sterling et al.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1326,
    Misc.
    Zaleck v. Wilson, Warden, et al.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1333,
    Misc.
    Lyons v. Klatte, Superintendent.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1334,
    Misc.
    Ruby v. Secretary of the Navy.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall for respondent.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1336,
    Misc.
    Knowles v. Alabama.
   Sup. Ct. Ala. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1335,
    Misc.
    Parness v. United States.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Philip B. Monahan for the United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari deniéd.


text:
    No. 1339,
    Misc.
    Vigil v. Oliver, Warden.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1341,
    Misc.
    Lynn et al. v. Kentucky.
   Ct. App. Ky. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1343,
    Misc.
    Puppe v. California.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1349,
    Misc.
    Meikle v. Fay, Warden.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1351,
    Misc.
    Gonzales v. Oliver, Warden.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1354,
    Misc.
    Wright v. Dickson, Warden, et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1357,
    Misc.
    Collins v. California.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1362,
    Misc.
    Honea v. Florida.

      Emma Andre Monroe for petitioner.
   Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1364,
    Misc.
    Ponce v. Oliver, Warden.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1365,
    Misc.
    Corbin v. Myers, Correctional Superintendent.

      Gerald E. Ruth for petitioner.
   Sup. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1366,
    Misc.
    Furtak v. Mancusi, Warden.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1368,
    Misc.
    McCrary v. South Carolina et al.
   Sup. Ct. S. C. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1369,
    Misc.
    Williams v. Florida.
   Sup. Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1372,
    Misc.
    Tkaczyk et al. v. Gallagher et al.

      Loring J. Whiteside for petitioners.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1373,
    Misc.
    Eidenmueller v. Follette, Warden.
   App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 2d Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1374,
    Misc.
    Pridgen v. Wainwright, Corrections Director.
   Sup. Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1408,
    Misc.
    Carey v. George Washington University.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1419,
    Misc.
    Johnson v. Texas.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1247,
    Misc.
    Everett v. United States.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.
   C. A.

9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr.-Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 1378,
    Misc.
    Jones v. United States.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Julia P. Cooper for the United States.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1379,
    Misc.
    Schruder v. Rhay, Penitentiary Superintendent, et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1417,
    Misc.
    Torres v. New York.

      Leon B. Polsky for petitioner. Frank S. Hogan for respondent.
   Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1430,
    Misc.
    Ashby v. Virginia.
   Sup. Ct. App. Va. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 167,
    Misc.
    Coffey v. Fay, Warden.

      Alfred I. Rosner and Martin B. Rosner for petitioner.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Fortas are of the opinion that certiorari should he granted. The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 571.
    No. 942.
    No. 1004.
    No. 1198,
    Misc.
    Von Clemm et al. v. Smith, Treasurer of the United States, et al., Alterman Transport Lines, Inc., et al. v. Public Service Commission of Tennessee et al., Arden Farms Co. et al. v. State Department of Agriculture et al., Shannon v. Sequeechi, Sheriff, et al.,
   385 U. S. 975;

ante, p. 262;

ante, p. 350; and

ante, p. 481. Petitions for rehearing denied.


text:
    April 24, 1967.
    No. 1340,
    Misc.
    Myricks v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Petition for writ of certiorari dismissed pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of this Court.


text:
    No. 370,
    No. 598,
    Misc., October Term, 1964.
    Misc., October Term, 1964.
    Williamson et al. v. Gilmer et al.; and Williamson et al. v. Gilmer et al.
    [For earlier orders herein; see 379 U. S. 875, 955.]
   Motion to recall orders of this Court and other relief denied.

Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.


text:
    No. 744.
    Waldron, Executrix v. Cities Service Co.

      Simon Rifkind, Edward N. Costikyan and Jay Greenfield on the motion.
   C. A. 2d Cir. (Certiorari granted, 385 U. S. 1024.) Motion of respondent to require certification of additional parts of record granted. The expense .of printing such additional parts of record shall initially be paid by respondent and ultimately shall abide the judgment of the Court at the conclusion of this case.


text:
    No. 1041.
    Nez Perce Tribe of Indians v. United States.

      Donald C. Gormley and Charles A. Hobbs on the motion.
    [For earlier order, see ante, p. 984.]
   Ct. Cl. Motion of petitioner for clarification of order denying petition for writ of certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1375,
    Misc.
    Brulotte et al. v. Merrill et al., U. S. Circuit Judges, et al.

      Arlington C. White, Margaret E. White and Cutler W. Halverson for petitioners.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus denied.


text:
    No. 9,
    Original.
    United States v. Louisiana et al.
    [For earlier actions herein, see, e. g., ante, p. 979.]
   Motion of the United States for preliminary injunction against the State of Texas denied on representation of the Attorney General of Texas that “Texas does not intend to lease any of the controverted area pending determination of this controversy.” Case will be set in due course for oral argument on the issues raised in the application of the United States for entry of a supplemental decree and reply of Texas thereto. Plaintiff is given until July -25, 1967, for filing its brief and the defendant is given until September 25, 1967, to file its reply.

The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.


text:
    No. 804.
    Moffatt et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

      Gerald G. Kelly and J. Patrick Whaley for petitioners. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Bogovin and Gilbert E. Andrews for respondent.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 910.
    South Texas Rice Warehouse Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

      Homer L. Bruce for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Acting Assistant Attorney General Pugh and Harry Baum for respondent.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1050.
    Henderson v. United States.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.
   Ct. Cl. Certiorari denied..


text:
    No. 1037.
    Tai Mui v. Esperdy, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization Service.

      Abraham Lebenkoff for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for respondent.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1038.
    Chan Hing et al. v. Esperdy, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization Service.

      Abraham Lebenkoff for petitioners. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for respondent.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1052.
    Retail Clerks International Association, AFL-CIO, et al. v. National Labor Relations Board.

      S. G. Lippman and Tim L. Bomstein for petitioners. Solicitor General Marshall, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli and Norton J. Come for respondent.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1090.
    Woo Cheng Hwa v. Immigration and Naturalization Service.

      Jack Wasserman and David Carliner for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for respondent.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1110.
    WWIZ, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission.

      Carl L. Shipley for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall and Henry Geller for respondent.
   C.A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1129.
    Janousek v. Chatterton et al.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1005.
    Reef Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

      Homer L. Bruce for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Acting Assistant Attorney General Pugh and Harry Baum for respondent.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied:


text:
    No. 1138.
    Bank of Utah et al. v. Commercial Security Bank.

      David S. Runs for petitioners. Moses Lasky and Neil R. Olmstead for respondent.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1140.
    National Surety Corp. v. Rauscher, Pierce & Co., Inc.

      Lloyd E. Elliott and Ralph D. Churchill for petitioner. Paul Carrington for respondent.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1141.
    Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Co. v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen et al.

      Martin M. Lucente, George L. Saunders, Jr., Ernest Porter and Kenneth D. Barrows for petitioner. Edward J. Hickey, Jr., and James L. Highsaw, Jr., for respondents.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1203.
    United States v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Rogovin, Harold C. Wilkenfeld and Martin T. Goldblum for the United States. Francis A. Goodhue, Jr., for respondent.
   Ct. Cl. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1300.
    Ali, aka Clay, et al. v. Gordon, U. S. District Judge.

      Hayden C. Covington for petitioners.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


author: Mr. Justice Douglas, Mr. Justice Fortas,

text:
    No. 750.
    Granello et al. v. United States.

      Irving Anolik, Irwin Klein and Irwin Germaise for petitioners. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Rogovin, Joseph M. Howard and John P. Burke for the United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Brennan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Mr. Justice Douglas,

dissenting.

. There are two issues in this case,, relating, to entirely separate events. The first concerns the seizure by the police of á' lawyer’s documents in Pennsylvania from the premises where the lawyer stored them. If we assume that the premises were unlawfully raided by the police, a client’s pápers seized and used against thé client in a criminal prosecution, does the client have standing to move to suppress the evidence? Whether petitioners were clients and Birrell their attorney are questions not fully resolved. But I think they are entitled to a hearing on the issue and on the. legality of the search. I cannot, as of now, believe that if a lawyer-client relation is shown and if the search were held to be illegal, the client is without standing to move for suppression of the evidence. The dimensions of the problem are so great, in the setting of the Fourth Amendment and our enveloping regime of police surveillance, that we should put the case down for argument.. Another issue, mentioned by my Brother Fortas, relates to electronic surveillance conducted in Florida. On that, we should at least remand the case for findings on electronic surveillance as suggested by my Brother Fortas in whose, opinion I concur — without prejudice of course to the search and seizure question.-

Mr. Justice Fortas,

with whom The Chief Justice joins, dissenting.

It is my opinion that certiorari should be granted and the case remanded for a hearing in the District Court with respect to the electronic surveillance which the Solicitor General has revealed to us. According to the Solicitor General, agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation on or about May 11, 1962, surreptitiously and by trespass installed an electronic listening device in a “commercial establishment' in Florida owned by an acquaintance of petitioner Levine and in which Levine may have had a proprietary interest.” The device was in operation for .nearly one year. During that time a number of conversations in which Levine participated were overheard. Some of those conversations were between Levine and attorneys representing him in prosecutions for interstate transport of counterfeit securities and for stock and mail fraud, matters then pending in a federal court in Florida.

The Solicitor General represents that this violation of petitioner Levine’s constitutional rights had no connection with the present case, which involves a prosecution in New York for failure to file income tax returns for 1956 and 1957. He says that it originated in connection with an FBI investigation relating to the charges for which petitioner Levine was tried and convicted in Florida. See Rogers v. United States, 334 F. 2d 83 (C. A. 5th Cir.), cert. denied, sub nom. Levine v. United States, 380 U. S. 915; Gradsky v. United States, 342 F. 2d 147 (C. A. 5th Cir.), vacated and remanded sub nom. Levine v. United States, 383 U. S. 265. The Government represents that nothing was overheard which had anything to do with the present criminal tax case, and that neither the Internal Revenue Service nor prosecuting counsel was apprised of the existence of the surveillance. The Solicitor General says that petitioner Levine will be furnished with the logs so that he may take whatever action is appropriate in the District. Court in Florida relating to the convictions obtained in that court.

It is entirely possible, perhaps even probable, that the Solicitor General’s representations will be validated, and it may be that ño reason will be developed for invalidating the present convictions because of the trespassory espionage or its fruits. But this is “dirty business.” Olmstead v. United States, 277 U. S. 438, 470 (1928) (dissenting opinion of Mr. Justice Holmes). It is important enough for the Solicitor General to call to our attention. And an. appraisal of the material and the circumstances by defense counsel may adduce facts affecting the weight to be given the unlawful operation which would never occur to the prosecutor. The prosecutorial eye is, after all, apt to yield an out-of-focus picture, as is the eye of the defense. But in our system we insist upon the perspective developed by both. See Dennis v. United States, 384 U. S. 855, 875 (1966). In.any event, the facts, circumstances, yield, and fruits of the electronic surveillance should be exposed in the record of this case so that wé may, at least, be sure that the Government’s trespas-sory surveillance has not infected the trial of these petitioners. Cf. O’Brien v. United States, ante, p. 345; Schipani v. United States, 385 U. S. 372 (1966); Black v. United States, 385 U. S. 26 (1966).


text:
    No. 1144.
    United States v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Rogovin, Harold C. Wilkenfeld and Martin T. Goldblum for the United States. Daniel M. Gribbon for respondent.
   Ct. Cl. Certiorari, denied.


text:
    No. 528.
    Bauers v. Heisel.

      Robert W. Maris, Anthony G. Amsterdam and Melvin Wulf for petitioner. Thomas J. Beetel for respondent.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 911.
    Davant et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

      Homer L. Bruce for petitioners. Solicitor General Marshall, Acting Assistant Attorney General Pugh and Harry Baum for respondent.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Motion for leave to file supplement to petition granted. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1128.
    Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. Smallwood.

      Francis B. Burch, Attorney General of Maryland, and Fred Oken, Assistant Attorney. General, for petitioner.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Motion to strike appendix “C” to petition denied. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 136,
    Misc.
    Brown v. Wainwright, Corrections Director, et al.
    Petitioner pro se. Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and James G. Mahorner, Assistant Attorney General, for respondents.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1288,
    Misc.
    McClellan v. Ohio.
    Petitioner pro se. Harry Friberg for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1304,
    Misc.
    McKinney v. Rundle, Correctional Superintendent.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1027,
    Misc.
    Bashlor v. Wainwright, Corrections Director.
    Petitioner pro se. Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and George R. Georgieff, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied.