text:
    No. 999,
    Misc.
    Harrison v. United States.

      Alfred V. J. Prather for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold for the United States.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.

The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


source: Caselaw Access Project

license: Public Domain

text:
    No. 335,
    Misc.
    George et ux. v. Bertrand et al.

      Camille F. Gravel, Jr., for petitioners. Hopkins P. Breazeale, Jr., for respondents Bulk Transport, Inc., et al.
   Sup. Ct. La. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 797,
    Misc.
    Cross v. Municipal Court of San Francisco et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari and other relief denied.


text:
    No. 513,
    Misc.
    Stasilowicz v. New Jersey.

      Eugene P. Kenny for petitioner.
   Sup. Ct. N. J. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 517,
    Misc.
    Castle v. United States.

      W. Edward Morgan for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold for the United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 616,
    Misc.
    Migliore et al. v. United States.

      Phillip A. Hubbart for petitioner Migliore. Solicitor General Griswold for the United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 656,
    Misc.
    Arellanes v. United States.

      F. Conger Fawcett for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold for the United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 716,
    Misc.
    Miller v. Beto, Corrections Director.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari and other relief denied.


text:
    No. 1279,
    October Term, 1968.
    United States v. Ideal Basic Industries, Inc.,
   395 U. S. 936. Petition for rehearing denied.

Mr. Justice White and Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 415.
    No. 428.
    No. 344,
    No. 623,
    No. 752,
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Parker v. Virginia, Brown v. Hardin et al., Scott v. Hunt Oil Co., Restrepo v. Florida Supreme Court, Jakalski v. Attorney General of the United States et al.,
   ante, p. 887;

ante, p. 909;

ante, p. 891;

ante, p. 918; and

ante, p. 922. Petitions for rehearing denied.


text:
    No. 391.
    Fitzgerald et al. v. Freeman et al.,
   ante, p. 875. Motion to stay effectiveness of order denying certiorari denied. Petition for rehearing denied.


text:
    No. 632.
    Alexander et al. v. Holmes County Board of Education et al.,
   ante, p. 19. Petition for rehearing, or in the alternative, clarification of judgment, denied.


text:
    December 9, 1969
    No. 457.
    Raderman v. Kaine et al.

      William M. Kunstler and Michael J. Kunstler for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold for respondents.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Petition for writ of certiorari dismissed pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of this Court.


author: Mr. Justice Douglas, Mr. Justice Black. Mr. Justice Stewart.

text:
    December 15, 1969
    No.--.
    Byrne, District Attorney of Suffolk County v. Karalexis et al.
   D. C. Mass. Motion for stay of temporary injunction issued by United States District Court for the District- of Massachusetts presented to Mr. Justice Brennan, and by him referred to the Court, granted pending timely filing and disposition of an appeal. Should such an appeal not be filed, this stay to expire automatically. Should such appeal be timely docketed, this stay to continue pending Court’s action on jurisdictional aspect of the case. In the event appeal is dismissed or judgment below summarily affirmed, this stay to expire automatically. Should Court note probable jurisdiction of appeal or postpone further consideration of question of jurisdiction to hearing on the merits, this stay to remain in effect pending issuance of the judgment of this Court.

Mr. Justice Douglas,

dissenting.

Respondents are the owners and operators of a motion picture theatre which has been showing the film, “I Am Curious (Yellow).” On June 3, 1969, they were indicted by the Suffolk County, Mass., Grand Jury for possessing with intent to exhibit an obscene film in violation of Mass. Gen. Laws, c. 272, § 28A. On June 17, 1969, respondents brought an action in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts to enjoin future prosecutions for the showing of “I Am Curious (Yellow)” and to declare that prosecution and the Massachusetts statute unconstitutional. On June 24, 1969, the three-judge District Court enjoined the prosecution on the ground that the indictments did not allege scienter. The indictments were then dismissed, and new indictments were thereafter returned. Respondents’ request for a temporary injunction barring the second prosecution was denied by the District Court on July 15, 1969. The court stated that it would not consider a claim that the film was not obscene as an evidentiary matter, but invited the parties to submit briefs on the question whether the Massachusetts statute was unconstitutional on its face.

Respondents were convicted of the state obscenity offense on November 12, 1969. The applicant in this proceeding, the District Attorney of Suffolk County, has not agreed that respondents may exhibit the film pending the appeal of their convictions. On November 19, 1969, applicant moved the District Court to abstain from deciding the constitutionality of the Massachusetts statute, pending the resolution of that issue in the state courts. On November 28, 1969, the District Court, by a 2-1 vote, denied the motion and authorized a temporary injunction enjoining applicant from interfering with respondents as respects future showings of the film, “I Am Curious (Yellow),” pending a final disposition by the District Court on the merits.

Applicant now requests this Court to stay the temporary injunction that was issued by the District Court.

The injunction issued by the District Court does not interfere in any way with the criminal conviction already obtained in the Massachusetts courts. That case will proceed unaffected by anything the federal court does, save for final execution of the state judgment. Dombrowski v. Pfister, 380 U. S. 479, is different. There we did not force petitioners to risk vindication of their constitutional rights in a state prosecution under an “overly broad” state statute. Id., at 486. But in this case that risk was faced and resolution of the constitutional issues is being undertaken in the state courts. All that the federal court proposes is protection of respondents against repeated prosecutions, while both the state courts and the federal courts are resolving the constitutional issues. Enjoining one state prosecution, though perhaps permissible under Ex parte Young, 209 U. S. 123, would not be in keeping with more recent decisions. Douglas v. Jeannette, 319 U. S. 157. But I read the sparse record before us differently from Mr. Justice Stewart and believe that we deal here with threats of repeated prosecutions; and those threats seem to me to be no less ominous to the federal constitutional regime than the threatened harassment of union leaders in Hague v. CIO, 307 U. S. 496, who were asserting First Amendment rights in explaining the purposes of the new National Labor Relations Act. See the opinion of Mr. Justice Roberts, in which Me. Justice Black concurred, id., at 504-506.

There may in time be a collision between the two systems for us to resolve. Meanwhile I would let the two orderly processes go ahead. For I can imagine no better and smoother accommodation of the needs of the two regimes than that designed by the District Court.

Underlying the state case and the federal case is an important First Amendment question. Some people think that “obscenity” is not protected by the Free Speech and Free Press Clauses of the First Amendment. They believe that both Congress and the States can set up regimes of censorship to weed out “obscenity” from literature, movies, and other publications so as to rid the press of what they, the judges, deem to be beyond the pale.

I have consistently dissented from that course but not because, as frequently charged, I relish “obscenity.” I have dissented before and now because I think the First Amendment bars all kinds of censorship. Ginsberg v. New York, 390 U. S. 629, 650 (Douglas, J., dissenting); Ginzburg v. United States, 383 U. S. 463, 482 (Douglas, J., dissenting); Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476, 508 (Douglas, J., dissenting). To impose a regime of censors requires, in my view, a constitutional amendment. “Obscenity” is no exception. “Obscenity” certainly was not an established exception to free speech and free press when the Bill of Rights was adopted. See my concurring opinion in Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U. S. 413, 428-433. It is a relatively new arrival on the American scene, propelled by dedicated zealots to cleanse all thought.

Prior to the Bill of Rights, state law, when it spoke of freedom of the press, meant only freedom from prior restraint. But an author or publisher could be held accountable for publishing what the statehouse thought was against “the public good.” In other words, the First Amendment did not build on existing law; it broke with tradition, set a new standard, and exalted freedom of expression. There is no trace of a suggestion that “obscenity,” however defined, was excepted.

That does not mean that “obscenity” is good or that it should be encouraged. It only means that we cannot be faithful to our constitutional mandate and allow any form or shadow of censorship over speech and press.

When our rewards go to people for thinking alike, it is no surprise that we become frightened at those who take exception to the current consensus. Then the hue and cry goes up for censors; and that is the start of an ominous trend. What can be done to literature under the banner of “obscenity” can be done to other parts of the spectrum of ideas when party or majoritarian demands mount and propagandists start declaiming the law.

The “obscenity” issue raises large questions. To what extent may government watch over one’s shoulder as he reads?

Judge Jerome Frank said in Roth v. Goldman, 172 F. 2d 788, 792:

“I think that no sane man thinks socially dangerous the arousing of normal sexual desires. Consequently, if reading obscene books has merely that consequence, Congress, it would seem, can constitutionally no more suppress such books than it can prevent the mailing of many other objects, such as perfumes, for example, which notoriously produce that result. But the constitutional power to suppress obscene publications might well exist if there were ample reason to believe that reading them conduces to socially harmful sexual conduct on the part of normal human beings. . . . Macaulay, replying to demands for suppression of obscene books, said: ‘We find it difficult to believe that in a world so full of temptations as this, any gentleman, whose life would have been virtuous if he had not read Aristophanes and Juvenal, will be made vicious by reading them.’ Substitute Waggish Tales from the Czech’ for ‘Aristophanes and Juvenal,’ and those remarks become relevant here.”

If “obscenity” can be carved out of the First Amendment, what other like exceptions can be created? Is “sacrilege” also beyond the pale? Are utterances or publications made with “malice” unprotected? How about “seditious” speech or articles? False, scandalous, and malicious writings or utterances against the Congress or the President “with intent to defame” or to bring them “into contempt or disrepute” or to “excite” against them “the hatred of the good people” or “to stir up sedition,” or to “excite” people to “resist, oppose, or defeat” any law were once made a crime. (1 Stat. 596-597.) Now that the First Amendment applies to the States, Stromberg v. California, 283 U. S. 359; Near v. Minnesota, 283 U. S. 697, may the States embark on such totalitarian controls over thought or over the press? May Congress do so?

We forget today that under our constitutional system neither Congress nor the States have any power to pass on the value, the propriety, the Americanism, the soundness of any idea or expression. It is that insulation from party or majoritarian control provided by the First Amendment — not our gross national product or mass production or pesticides or space ships or nuclear arsenal — that distinguishes our society from the other planetary regimes.

Opinion of

Mr. Justice Black.

I agree completely with Mr. Justice Douglas that state criminal punishment of these respondents for showing an allegedly “obscene” film is absolutely prohibited by the First and Fourteenth Amendments. That, however, does not end for me the constitutional problems involved. In this case a Federal District Court stepped into the middle of a pending state criminal prosecution, rendered an opinion in effect deciding the fundamental constitutional issue in the state case, and enjoined the initiation of new prosecutions of these defendants or the execution of any sentence imposed on them in the pending state case. One of the fundamental aspects of our federal constitutional system requires that federal courts refrain from interfering in pending state criminal prosecutions except in highly unusual and very limited circumstances. I do not think the facts of this case present an occasion for departure from that general rule. It is for that reason alone that I agree with the Court's decision to stay the injunction issued by the Federal District Court against the District Attorney of Suffolk County.

Opinion of

Mr. Justice Stewart.

Without reaching the First and Fourteenth Amendment issues discussed by Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas, I join the Court’s decision to stay the injunction for the reason indicated by Mr. Justice Black — i. e., the general rule that “requires that federal courts refrain from interfering in pending state criminal prosecutions . . . .” This case does not now present the “highly unusual and very limited circumstances” that would justify a departure from that rule — such as would be presented by the threat or actuality of repetitive prosecutions for exhibition of the film in question.

      John Hohenberg recently stated this First Amendment philosophy in a slightly different setting:
      “As Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn wrote in bitter response to his removal from the rolls of the Russian Writers’ Union late in 1969 following the West’s sympathetic reception of two of his novels that he could not have published in his own country: ‘It is time to remember that the first thing we belong to is humanity. And humanity is separated from the animal world by thought and speech, and they should naturally be free. If they are fettered, we go back to being animals. Publicity and openness, honest and complete — that is the prime condition for the health of every society, and ours too.’
      “Wherever freedom is denied, these words will five on.” 52 Saturday Review 72 (Dec. 13, 1969).


text:
    No. —.
    Schmid v. Eyman, Warden, et al.
   Application for writ of habeas corpus presented to Mr. Justice Marshall, and by him referred to the Court, denied.


text:
    No. —.
    Petuskey et al. v. Rampton, Governor of Utah, et al.

      A. Wally Sandack on the motion.
   Motion for further extension of time to docket appeal granted.


text:
    No. 74.
    Taggart et al. v. Weinacker’s, Inc.
    J. Albert Woll, Laurence Gold, and Thomas E. Harris on the motion.
   Sup. Ct. Ala. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 813.] Motion of American Federation of Labor & Congress of Industrial Organizations for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted.


text:
    No. 830.
    Chambers v. Maroney, Correctional Superintendent.
   C. A. 3d Cir. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 900.] Motion of petitioner for appointment of counsel granted. It is ordered that Vincent J. Grogan, Esquire, of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, a member of the Bar of this Court, be, and he is hereby, appointed to serve as counsel for petitioner in this case.


text:
    No. 1178,
    Misc.
    Leser v. United States et al.
   D. C. C. D. Cal. Application for bail presented to The Chief Justice, and by him referred to the Court, denied.


text:
    No. 240.
    Covello v. United States,
   ante, p. 879. The Solicitor General is requested to file a response to petition for rehearing within 30 days.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the entry of this order.


text:
    No. 1162,
    No. 1182,
    No. 1216,
    No. 1251,
    No. 1253,
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Sogoian v. Craven, Warden; Rawls v. Blackwell, Warden; Loney v. Brewer, Warden; Vinson v. Arizona et al.; and Collins v. United States.
   Motions for leave to file petitions for writs of habeas corpus denied.


text:
    No. 988,
    Misc.
    Waltz v. Davis, Clerk of the United States Supreme Court.
   Motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus denied.


text:
    No. 515.
    United States et al. v. Gifford-Hill-American, Inc., et al.

      Solicitor General Griswold and Assistant Attorney General McLaren for petitioners. Stanley E. Neely for Gifford-Hill-American, Inc., and Julian O. von Kalinowski for United Concrete Pipe Corp., respondents.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 628.
    Schacht v. United States.

      Arthur Mandell for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Mervyn Hamburg for the United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Motion for leave to file petition for writ of certiorari out of time granted. Certiorari granted.

The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Stewart, and Mr. Justice White would deny the motion.


text:
    No. 409.
    No. 418.
    Wilkinson, Commonwealth’s Attorney for the City of Richmond, Virginia, et al. v. Tyrone, Inc., trading as Lee Art Theatre, et al.; and Tyrone, Inc., trading as Lee Art Theatre, et al. v. Wilkinson, Commonwealth’s Attorney for the City of Richmond, Virginia, et al.

      James B. Wilkinson, pro se, and for other petitioner in No. 409, and pro se and for other respondent in No. 418. Joseph S. Bambacus for respondents in No. 409 and for petitioners in No. 418.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Reported below: 410 F. 2d 639.


text:
    No. 421.
    Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. et al. v. City of St. Paul.

      Arthur J. Donnelly and Richard M. Freeman for petitioners. Robert E. O’Connell for respondent.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 462.
    Scott v. Ohio Citizens Trust Co.

      Harland M. Britz for petitioner. Fred A. Smith for respondent.
   Ct. App. Ohio, Lucas County. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 464.
    Hamilton et al. v. Municipal Court for the Berkeley-Albany Judicial District.

      Marshall W. Krause for petitioners. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Albert W. Harris, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, and Clifford K. Thompson, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
   Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 592.
    Floyd v. City of Rockford.

      John R. Snively for petitioner.
   App. Ct. Ill., 2d Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 591.
    Cleveland v. Illinois.

      John R. Snively for petitioner.
   App. Ct. Ill., 2d Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 596.
    Illman v. Toledo Bar Assn.

      Nelson Lancione for petitioner. Charles E. Ide, Jr., for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 600.
    Bambulas v. Illinois.

      Charles A. Bellows for petitioner.
   Sup. Ct. Ill. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 619.
    Manchester Band of Pomo Indians, Inc. v. Zirpoli, U. S. District Judge.

      George F. Duke for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Kashiwa, Edmund B. Clark, and Jacques B. Gelin for respondent.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 622.
    Pizzarello v. United States et al.

      James G. Starkey for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Walters, Joseph M. Howard, and John P. Burke

    for the United States et al.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 624.
    Ray Smith Transport Co. v. Schultz, Secretary of Labor.

      T. S. Christopher for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold and Bessie Margolin for respondent.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 626.
    Farley v. Kramer, Judge, et al.

      Stanley E. Preiser for petitioner.
   Sup. Ct. App. W. Va. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 629.
    White v. South Carolina.

      Philip Wittenberg for petitioner.
   Sup. Ct. S. C. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 631.
    Carliner et al. v. Commissioner of the District of Columbia et al.

      David Carliner, pro se, and Arthur W. Jackson and Reuben Robertson III for petitioners. Hubert B. Pair, Richard W. Barton, and David P. Sutton for respondents.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certio-rari denied.


text:
    No. 633.
    Muller et al. v. Oklahoma.

      John C. Moran for petitioners.
   Ct. Crim. App. Okla. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 634.
    Weersing v. United States.

      David Finkel and Hugh R. Manes for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, Jerome M. Feit, and Edward Fenig for the United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 635.
    Craig, Administratrix v. United States et al.

      Peter J. Hughes for petitioner. Charles W. Rees, Jr., for respondent Litton Systems, Inc.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 636.
    City of Newark v. Port of New York Authority.

      Philip E. Gordon and Sam Weiss for petitioner. Sidney Goldstein and Francis A. Mulhern for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. N. J. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 640.
    Scarselletti v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
   Sup. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 638.
    Crumley v. Tennessee.

      Norman D. Lane for petitioner. Thomas E. Fox, Deputy Attorney General of Tennessee, and C. Hayes Cooney, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Tenn. Certiorari denied.


author: Mr. Chief Justice Burger,

text:
    No. 166.
    Sigler, Warden v. Losieau.

      Clarence A. H. Meyer, Attorney General of Nebraska, and Melvin Kent Kammerlohr, Assistant Attorney General, for petitioner.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Chief Justice Burger,

with whom Mr. Justice Stewart joins,

dissenting.

I would grant certiorari and summarily reverse. The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit has erroneously interpreted the decision of this Court in Burgett v. Texas, 389 U. S. 109 (1967), and also has effectively overruled the Nebraska Supreme Court on a question of state law — the interpretation of Nebraska’s Habitual Criminal Act.

Losieau was convicted of burglary in 1952. Under Nebraska practice, after the jury had made the guilty finding, the trial court held a hearing outside the jury’s presence to determine whether or not the penalty for burglary should be enhanced under the Nebraska Habitual Criminal Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2221 (1964 Reissue). A 1945 conviction for stealing a car was one of the prior convictions alleged, and the trial court found it and another conviction to be valid for enhancement purposes. Losieau was given a 20-year sentence. He then brought unsuccessful state post-conviction actions, contending that the 1952 sentence was invalid because he was denied counsel (1) when he pleaded guilty to the 1945 charge and (2) when he was thereafter sentenced to a prison term of three years for the conviction based on the charge. Thereafter Losieau sought habeas corpus on a claim before the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska that he had been denied counsel at the 1945 proceedings in the state court. The federal court denied relief after hearing, finding that Losieau had been represented by-counsel when he actually pleaded guilty to the auto theft charge in 1945. It also held that the validity of the 1945 sentence and the underlying issue of lack of counsel at sentencing one day following the plea were irrelevant, noting that any defect in sentencing would not affect the validity of the conviction, and observing that under Nebraska law it was solely the validity of the conviction, not the sentence, which was important. On appeal, the Eighth Circuit reversed, deciding that, because the Nebraska Habitual Criminal Act applied where a defendant had been twice previously “convicted of crime, sentenced and committed to prison,” Burgett required that the sentence also be valid to give effect to the right to counsel at sentencing in 1945.

The Nebraska Habitual Criminal Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2221 (1964 Reissue), provides in part:

“(1) Whoever has been twice convicted of crime, sentenced and committed to prison, ... for terms of not less than one year each, shall, upon conviction of a felony committed in this state, be deemed to be an habitual criminal . . . .”

The Supreme Court of Nebraska has indicated that “an unauthorized or erroneous sentence does not void a lawful conviction” for the purposes of § 29-2221. Kennedy v. State, 171 Neb. 160, 176, 105 N. W. 2d 710, 721 (1960). See also State v. Burnside, 181 Neb. 20, 146 N. W. 2d 754 (1966), cert. denied, 387 U. S. 936 (1967); Haswell v. State, 167 Neb. 169, 92 N. W. 2d 161 (1958).

Burgett v. Texas, supra, held that a conviction obtained in violation of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U. S. 335 (1963), could not be used “to support guilt or enhance punishment for another offense . . (389 U. S., at 115), because such use would be giving renewed effect to the denial of Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights. Burgett did not require the Eighth Circuit to reinterpret Nebraska’s § 29-2221 to require that a sentence as well as a conviction be validly entered.


text:
    No. 456.
    Tijerina et al. v. United States.

      Richard F. Watt, John M. Bowlus, Morton Stavis, and William Kunstler for petitioners. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Roger A. Pauley for the United States.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.

The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 458.
    Johnson et al. v. Massachusetts.

      Robert Eugene Smith for petitioners. Robert H. Quinn, Attorney General of Massachusetts, John Wall, Assistant Attorney General, and Garrett H. Byrne for respondent.
   Sup. Jud. Ct. Mass. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that cer-tiorari should be granted and the judgment below reversed.


text:
    No. 607.
    Daily Press, Inc. v. United Press International et al.

      Eugene Driker for petitioner. H. William Butler and Richard F. Stevens for United Press International, Leslie W. Fleming for Evening News Assn., and Kenneth Murray and Brownson Murray for Knight Newspapers, Inc., respondents.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 641.
    United Air Lines, Inc. v. Thomas, Executrix, et al.

      William J. Junkerman for petitioner. Edward M. O’Brien for respondents.
   Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 109,
    Misc.
    Lambright v. Craven, Warden, et al.

      Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and Robert F. Katz, Deputy Attorney General, for respondents.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 284,
    Misc.
    Madkins v. O’Neil, Judge, et al.

      Robert W. Warren, Attorney General of Wisconsin, and William A. Platz, Assistant Attorney General, for respondents.
   Sup. Ct. Wis. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 325,
    Misc.
    Henderson v. California.

      S. Carter McMorris for petitioner. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Doris H. Maier, Assistant Attorney General, and Roger E. Venturi, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
   Ct. App. Cal., 3d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 353,
    Misc.
    Berg v. California.

      James M. Weinberg for petitioner. Roger Arnebergh, Philip E. Grey, and Michael T. Sauer for respondent.
   App. Dept., Super. Ct. Cal., County of Los Angeles. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 367,
    Misc.
    Kagan v. Schneckloth, Conservation Center Superintendent.

      Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Doris H. Maier, Assistant Attorney General, and Charles P. Just, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 438,
    Misc.
    Dickinson v. Bridges, Sheriff.

      James L. Highsaw, Jr., for respondent.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 446,
    Misc.
    Barnett et al. v. Pontesso, Corrections Director, et al.

      H. L. McConnell, Assistant Attorney General of Oklahoma, for respondents.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 449,
    Misc.
    Kenyatta v. Virginia.

      Lawrence E. Freedman for petitioner.
   Sup. Ct. App. Va. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 475,
    Misc.
    Alonzo v. Board of Commissioners of the Alabama State Bar.

      M. Roland Nachman, Jr., for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Ala. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 505,
    Misc.
    Carlton et ux. v. Gerstein.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 557,
    Misc.
    Pence v. United States.

      Thomas A. Conroy for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, and Jerome M. Feit for the United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 587,
    Misc.
    Gantt v. United States.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Roger A. Pauley for the United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 648,
    Misc.
    Carnegie v. Connecticut.

      David M. Reilly for petitioner. David B. Salzman for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Conn. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 569,
    Misc.
    In re Lipscomb.

      Solicitor General Griswold in opposition.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 663,
    Misc.
    Evans v. California.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 673,
    Misc.
    Moss v. United States.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 725,
    Misc.
    Ferrara v. United States.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 736,
    Misc.
    Withridge v. New York.

      Frank S. Hogan for respondent.
   App. Term, Sup. Ct. N. Y., 1st Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 794,
    Misc.
    Johnson v. United States.

      Solicitor General Griswold for the United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 862,
    Misc.
    Williams v. Cox, Penitentiary Superintendent.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 876,
    Misc.
    Archie v. New Mexico.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 924,
    Misc.
    Gowdy v. Tahash, Warden.

      John S. Connolly for petitioner.
   Sup. Ct. Minn. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 964,
    Misc.
    Swain v. North Carolina.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 965,
    Misc.
    Garner v. Florida.
   Sup. Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 985,
    Misc.
    Hutchinson v. California.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 990,
    Misc.
    Lluveras v. New York.

      Frank S. Hogan and Michael R. Juviler for respondent.
   App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 1st Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1042,
    Misc.
    Dozie v. Wisconsin.
   Sup. Ct. Wis. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1043,
    Misc.
    Mintzer v. Deegan, Warden.
   App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 2d Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1046,
    Misc.
    Graham v. United States.

      Solicitor General Gris-wold for the United States.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1047,
    Misc.
    Alston v. Follette, Warden.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1068,
    Misc.
    Landman v. United States.

      Solicitor General Griswold for the United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1077,
    Misc.
    Heslip v. New Jersey.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1086,
    Misc.
    Morales v. Craven, Warden.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1141,
    Misc.
    Daniels v. Nelson, Warden, et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1089,
    Misc.
    Hallowell v. Nelson, Warden.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1135,
    Misc.
    Scanlan v. Field, Men’s Colony Superintendent.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1142,
    Misc.
    Stevenson v. Mancusi, Warden.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 636,
    Misc.
    Pritchard v. United States.

      David Rein for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Sidney M. Glazer for the United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 748,
    October Term, 1968.
    Jenkins v. Delaware,
   395 U. S. 213. Petition for rehearing denied.

The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    December 17, 1969
    No. 412,
    Misc.
    Wilfong v. Missouri.

      John C. Danforth, Attorney General of Missouri, and Dale L. Rollings and Michael L. Boicourt, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Mo. Petition for writ of certiorari dismissed pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of this Court.


text:
    No. 1152,
    Misc.
    Knox v. Patuxent Institution Director.
   Ct. Sp. App. Md. Petition for writ of certiorari dismissed pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of this Court.


text:
    December 18, 1969
    No. 895.
    Carpenter v. Cox et al.

      William J. Harbison for petitioner. Charles L. Cornelius, Jr., for respondents.
   Sup. Ct. Tenn. Petition for writ of certiorari dismissed pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of this Court.


text:
    December 19, 1969
    No. 944.
    Carter et al. v. West Feliciana Parish School Board et al.

      John F. Ward, Jr., on the motion.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Motion for emergency reconsideration of granting of injunctive order [ante, p. 226] denied.


text:
    December 22, 1969
    No. 126,
    Misc.
    Yates v. Kansas.

      Kent Frizzell, Attorney General of Kansas, and J. Richard Foth and Ernest C. Ballweg, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Kan. Petition for writ of certiorari dismissed pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of this Court.


text:
    January 8, 1970
    No. 54.
    Cavitt v. Nebraska.

      Richard A. Huebner for appellant. Clarence A. H. Meyer, Attorney General of Nebraska, and Melvin Kent Kammerlohr, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
   Appeal from Sup. Ct. Neb. [Probable jurisdiction noted, 393 U. S. 1078.] Appeal dismissed pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of this Court.


text:
    January 12, 1970
    No. 678,
    Misc.
    Myles v. Procunier, Corrections Director, et al.

      Paul Ligda for petitioner.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Petition for writ of certiorari dismissed pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of this Court.


text:
    No. 911.
    American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania v. Young, Trustee in Bankruptcy, et al.

      Robert E. Curran and Kevin D. Moloney for petitioner. Herman Cohn for respondents.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Petition for writ of certiorari dismissed pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of this Court.


text:
    No. —.
    Coffey v. Craven, Warden.

      Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Albert W. Harris, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, and Joyce Ferris Nedde, Deputy Attorney General, in opposition.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Petition presented to Mr. Justice Douglas for reconsideration of denial of bail, and by him referred to the Court, denied.


text:
    No. —.
    Signorelli v. Malleck.

      Solicitor General Griswold in opposition.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Application for restraining order presented to Mr. Justice Douglas, and by him referred to the Court, denied.


text:
    No. 74.
    Taggart et al. v. Weinacker’s, Inc.

      Brice I. Bishop and Phil B. Hammond on the motion for American Retail Federation.
   Sup. Ct. Ala. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 813.] Motions of American Retail Federation and Homart Development Co. for leave to file briefs as amici curiae granted.


text:
    No. 53.
    Baird v. State Bar of Arizona.
   Sup. Ct. Ariz. [Certiorari granted, 394 U. S. 957.] Case restored to calendar for reargument.


text:
    No. 230.
    H. K. Porter Co., Inc., Disston Division-Danville Works v. National Labor Relations Board et al.

      George H. Cohen and Bernard Klein-man on the motion.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 817.] Motion of United Steelworkers of America for leave to participate in oral argument granted and 15 minutes allotted for that purpose. An additional 15 minutes allotted to counsel for petitioner.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.


text:
    No. 234.
    Czosek et al. v. O’Mara et al.

      William B. Mahoney for O’Mara et al., and Thomas G. Rickert, Richard F. Griffin, and Courtland R. LaVallee for Erie Lackawanna Railroad Co. on the motion.
   C. A. 2d Cir. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 814.] Motion of respondents for permission for two attorneys to participate in oral argument granted.


text:
    No. 300.
    Tate et al. v. Hickel, Secretary of the Interior, et al.

      Solicitor General Griswold on the motion for Stone, and Houston Bus Hill on the motion for Dorita High Horse.
   C. A. 10th Cir. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 815.] Motion of Richard B. Stone for leave to argue pro hac vice in behalf of Hickel granted. Motion of respondent, Dorita High Horse, to remove case from summary calendar denied. Fifteen additional minutes allotted to each side.


text:
    No. 692.
    Public Service Commission of Wyoming et al. v. Tri-State Generation & Transmission Assn., Inc.
   C. A. 10th Cir. The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief expressing the views of the United States.


text:
    No. 75.
    In re Stolar.
   Sup. Ct. Ohio. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 816.] Case restored to calendar for reargument.


text:
    No. 730.
    Hill v. California.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 818.] Motion of petitioner for appointment of counsel granted. It is ordered that Joseph Amato, Esquire, of Palos Verdes Estates, California, be, and he is hereby, appointed to serve as counsel for petitioner in this case.


text:
    No. 1074,
    No. 1264,
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Hall v. Wingo, Warden; and Maisonave v. Wainwright, Corrections Director.
   Motions for leave to file petitions for writs of habeas corpus denied.


text:
    No. 1178,
    Misc.
    Leser v. United States et al.
   Motion for leave to file petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.


text:
    No. 262,
    No. 310,
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Poggi v. Gray, U. S. District Judge; and Poggi v. Gray, U. S. District Judge.
   Motions for leave to file petitions for writs of mandamus denied.


text:
    No. 696.
    Law Students Civil Rights Research Council, Inc., et al. v. Wadmond et al.

      Alan H. Levine, Jeremiah S. Gutman, and Leonard B. Boudin for appellants. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, and Daniel M. Cohen, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
   Appeal from D. C. S. D. N. Y. Probable jurisdiction noted and case set for argument immediately following No. 75 [restored to calendar, supra].


text:
    No. 726.
    Mitchell et al. v. Donovan, Secretary of State of Minnesota, et al.

      Lynn S. Castner and Melvin L. Wulf for appellants. Douglas M. Head, Attorney General of Minnesota, pro se, Arne L. Schoeller, Chief Deputy Attorney General, and John R. Kenefick and James M. Kelley, Special Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.
   Appeal from D. C. Minn. Probable jurisdiction noted.

Mr. Justice Harlan is of the opinion that further consideration of question of jurisdiction should be postponed to hearing on the merits.


text:
    No. 661.
    Hellenic Lines Ltd. et al. v. Rhoditis.

      George F. Wood for petitioners. James M. Estabrook and David P. H. Watson for Royal Greek Government, and John R. Sheneman for Union of Greek Shipowners et al. on the motions.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Motion of Royal Greek Government for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Motion of Union of Greek Shipowners et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 678.
    Nash et al. v. United States.

      Alex W. Newton for petitioners. Solicitor General Griswold for the United State?.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 768.
    Boys Markets, Inc. v. Retail Clerks Union, Local 770.

      Joseph M. McLaughlin for petitioner. Kenneth M. Schwartz for respondent. Carl M. Gould and Stanley E. Tobin for Plumbing-Heating & Piping Employers Council of Southern California, Inc., as amicus curiae in support of the petition.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 387.
    California v. Green.

      Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, and William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, for petitioner.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 242.
    Perez v. California.

      Vincent Hallinan for petitioner.

      Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Albert W. Harris, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, and Deraid E. Cranberg and Gloria F. DeHart, Deputy Attorneys General, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 504.
    Donaldson v. Illinois.

      Robert S. Bailey for petitioner. William J. Scott, Attorney General of Illinois, and Joel M. Flaum and Thomas J. Immel, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.
   App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 567.
    Mettler et ux. v. California.

      McPherson Berrien E. Moore for petitioners. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and James L. Markman, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
   Ct. App. Cal., 4th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 627.
    Marine v. United States.

      David P. Schippers for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 379.
    Lemke v. City of Newport News.
   Sup. Ct. App. Va. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 643.
    Frilette et al. v. Kimberlin et al.

      Oswald G. Hayes, Raymond W. Barclay, Richard K. Stevens, Davidson C. Miller, and John F. Witherspoon for petitioners. Malvin R. Mandelbaum for respondents.
   C. C. P. A. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 644.
    Southern Railway Co. v. City of Knoxville.

      Charles A. Horsky and Clyde W. Key for petitioner. W. P. Boone Dougherty for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Tenn. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 645.
    Floersheim, dba Floersheim Sales Co. et al. v. Federal Trade Commission.

      Marion Edwyn Harrison for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General McLaren, and Alvin L. Berman for respondent.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 648.
    Hammond Milling Co. et al. v. United States.

      E. David Rosen for petitioners. Solicitor General Griswold, Assisi cm i Attorney General Wilson, Jerome M. Feit, and Leonard H. Dickstein for the United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 665.
    Brush-Moore Newspapers, Inc., dba Portsmouth Times v. National Labor Relations Board.

      Earle K. Shawe for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, and Norton J. Come for respondent.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 646.
    Arizona ex rel. Merrill, Sheriff v. Turtle.

      Gary K. Nelson, Attorney General of Arizona, and Carl Waag, Assistant Attorney General, for petitioner. Theodore R. Mitchell for respondent.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 650.
    Human Engineering Institute, Inc. v. Welch Scientific Co.

      Bruce B. Krost for petitioner. John D. Dewey for respondent.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 651.
    First National Bank of Lincolnwood v. Carroll et al.

      Martin S. Gerber for petitioner. Sidney R. Zatz and John J. Enright for respondents.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 652.
    Penrod Drilling Co. v. Johnson et al.

      Thomas A. Harrell for petitioner. Scott Baldwin for respondents.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 657.
    Acker v. United States.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Acting Assistant Attorney General Ugast, Joseph M. Howard, and John M. Brant for the United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 658.
    Local No. 380, International Union, Allied Industrial Workers of America, AFL-CIO v. National Labor Relations Board et al.

      Gerry M. Miller for petitioner. Solicitor General Giiswold, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, Norton J. Come, and Linda Sher for National Labor Relations Board, and Walter S. Davis for Flambeau Plastics Corp., respondents.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 659.
    Cerrito v. United States.

      Julius Lucius Echeles for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, and Jerome M. Feit for the United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 660.
    Weiner v. Cuyahoga Community College District et al.

      Thomas J. McDermott for petitioner. George I. Meisel for respondents.
   Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 667.
    Patton Manufacturing Co. et al. v. Kimberling, Trustee in Bankruptcy.

      Ford W. Ekey for petitioners. Bradley J. Schaeffer for respondent.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 671.
    Presto Manufacturing Co. v. National Labor Relations Board et al.

      Abraham J. Harris for petitioner. Solicitor General Grisxoold, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, Norton J. Come, and Linda Sher for respondent National Labor Relations Board.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 673.
    Glen & Mohawk Milk Assn., Inc. v. Wickham, Commissioner of Agriculture & Markets of New York.

      John R. Davison for petitioner. Robert G. Blabey for respondent.
   Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 680.
    Fiedler v. New York.

      Herald Price Fahringer for petitioner. Michael F. Dillon for respondent.
   Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 682.
    General Electric Co. v. National Labor Relations Board et al.

      William W. Sturges for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, and Norton J. Come for National Labor Relations Board, and Irving Abramson and Ruth Weyand for International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers, AFL-CIO, et al., respondents.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 684.
    Markham Advertising Co., Inc., et al. v. Zahn et al.

      Alfred J. Schweppe and Thomas R. Beierle for petitioners. Slade Gorton, Attorney General of Washington, Robert J. Doran, Deputy Attorney General, and Delbert W. Johnson, Special Assistant Attorney General, for respondents.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 685.
    Harris v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission.

      Theodore Kostos for petitioner.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 686.
    Bugden v. Bugden.

      Roland D. Hartshorn for petitioner.
   Sup. Ct. Ga. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 689.
    Boyles v. Mississippi.

      P. J. Townsend, Jr., for petitioner.
   Sup. Ct. Miss. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 691.
    Baird v. United States.

      Simon H. Rifkind, Jay H. Topkis, Thomas R. Farrell, and Boris Kostelanetz for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Walters, Joseph M. Howard, and John P. Burke for the United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 690.
    James Talcott, Inc. v. Ivor B. Clark Co., Inc., et al.

      Thomas B. Leary and David Hartfield, Jr., for petitioner. Arthur S. Friedman and Hyman Frankel for respondents.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 695.
    Sirbu et al. v. Sirbu.

      John B. Vintilla for petitioners. C. Kenneth Clark, Jr., for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 697.
    Morton et al., trading as Pennbrook Milk Co. v. National Dairy Products Corp.

      Frederic L. Ballard for petitioners. William H. Lowery and Owen B. Rhoads for respondent.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 698.
    Scott et al. v. United States.

      Raymond J. Smith for petitioners. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, Jerome M. Feit, and Robert G. Maysack for the United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 699.
    Licausi v. United States.

      Allen David Stolar for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold for the United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 700.
    Bassick Co. et al. v. Blake et al.

      Dugald S. McDougall and A. G. Douvas for petitioners. John D. Dewey for respondents.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 709.
    Thomas v. Peterson Marine Service, Inc.

      Charles R. Maloney for petitioner.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 702.
    A. H. Belo Corp. (WFAA-TV) v. National Labor Relations Board.

      Joseph Alton Jenkins for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, Norton J. Come, and Linda Sher for respondent. L.N.D. Wells, Jr., for Local 1257, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO, intervenor below.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 704.
    Pyle v. Ohio.

      William H. Thornburgh for petitioner. R. K. Wilson for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 707.
    Pennaluna & Co., Inc., et al. v. Securities and Exchange Commission.

      Richard Maguire for petitioners. Solicitor General Griswold and Philip A. Loomis, Jr., for respondent.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 708.
    Sacks v. United States.

      Alan G. Wilsey for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold for the United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 710.
    First National City Bank of New York v. American Fire & Casualty Co.

      Victor House for petitioner.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 716.
    Leslie et ux. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

      M. Bernard Aidinoff and Kendyl K. Monroe for petitioners. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Walters, Harry Baum, and Robert I. Waxman for respondent.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 711.
    Taylor et al. v. Dealers Transport Co. et al.

      George J. Long for petitioners. Newell N. Fowler for Dealers Transport Co., and Edgar A. Zingman for E & L Transport Co., respondents.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 712.
    Smith v. United States.

      Clarence H. Pease for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold for the United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 717.
    Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen et al.

      Charles A. Horsky, John B. Miller, and Julian C. Sipple for petitioner. Harold A. Ross for respondents.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 718.
    Bessman et al., dba Bessman Insurance Agency v. Bacalis.
   Sup. Ct. Mich. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 719.
    Wright et ux. v. Dade County.

      Richard H. W. Maloy for petitioners.
   Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 3d Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 720.
    Bauer v. Stern Finance Co. et al.

      Dan Johnston for petitioner. Joseph Z. Marks for respondents.
   Sup. Ct. Iowa. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 721.
    Wynn et ux. v. United States.

      Sherwin T. McDowell for petitioners. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Walters, Harry Baum, and Robert I. Waxman for the United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 723.
    Wainwright v. United States.

      George J. Francis for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Walters, and Joseph M. Howard for the United States.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 724.
    Swindler v. United States.

      James Lewis Mann Cromer for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, and Jerome M. Feit for the United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 733.
    Merchants National Bank & Trust Co. of Indianapolis v. Professional Men’s Assn., Inc., et al.

      Donald A. Schabel for petitioner. Robert W. Smith for respondents.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 734.
    White Consolidated Industries, Inc. v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.

      George I. Meisel for petitioner. S. Hazard Gillespie and S. Samuel Arsht for respondent.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 744.
    Rossi v. Fletcher.

      William D. Donnelly for petitioner.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 745.
    Cox’s Food Center, Inc. v. Retail Clerks Union, Local No. 1653, et al.

      Eli Weston for petitioner. Donald Grody and Hugh Hajer for respondents.
   Sup. Ct. Idaho. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 751.
    Mazzochi v. New York.

      Irving Anolik for petitioner.
   App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 1st Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 740.
    Cantrell v. City of Oklahoma City.

      Don Hamilton for petitioner. Roy H. Semtner and Giles K. Ratcliffe for respondent.
   Ct. Crim. App. Okla. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 747.
    Taylor v. United States.

      Gordon C. Culp for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 750.
    Nagelberg v. United States.

      Irwin Klein for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Robert G. Maysack for the United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 754.
    Polymers, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board.

      Francis J. Vaas for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, Norton J. Come, and Linda Sher for respondent.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 759.
    Public Service Company of Indiana, Inc., et al. v. Hamil, Administrator of Rural Electrification Administration, et al.

      Alan W. Boyd for Public Service Company of Indiana, Inc., and G. R. Redding and Fred P. Bamberger for Southern Indiana Gas & Electric Co., petitioners. Solicitor General Griswold, Acting Assistant Attorney General Eardley, and Alan S. Rosenthal for respondents.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 765.
    Toro v. Julio E. Geraldino, Inc.
   Sup. Ct. Puerto Rico. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 755.
    Minneapolis Park Board v. Minnesota.

      Raymond A. Haik for petitioner. Douglas M. Head, Attorney General of Minnesota, Arne L. Schoeller, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Richard H. Kyle, Deputy Attorney General, and James M. Kelley, Special Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Minn. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 757.
    Carroll v. United States District Court for the District of Colorado.

      Rebecca L. Bradley and Walter L. Gerash for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Ruckelshaus, Alan S. Rosenthal, and Alexander P. Humphrey for respondent.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 758.
    Rubin v. United States.

      Stanley Jay Bartel for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, Jerome M. Feit, and Edward Fenig for the United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 763.
    Indianola Municipal Separate School District et al. v. United States.

      Hardy Lott for petitioners. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Leonard, and J. Harold Flannery for the United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 653.
    Jones v. City of Birmingham.

      Arthur Parker for petitioner. J. M. Breckenridge and William C. Walker for respondent.
   Ct. App. Ala. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 764.
    Fowler Manufacturing Co. v. Gorlick et al., dba Thrifty Supply Co. et al.

      Floyd V. Smith for petitioner. Donald G. Cohan for respondents.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 769.
    Wyatt v. Hocker, Warden.

      Richard C. Minor for petitioner.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 822.
    No. 825.
    No. 826.
    Basan v. United States; Hutul v. United States; and Lombardi v. United States.

      Charles A. Bellows for petitioner in No. 825, and Thomas P. Sullivan for petitioner in No. 826. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Roger A. Pauley for the United States in all three cases.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Reported below: 416 F. 2d 607.


text:
    No. 160.
    Hopper et al. v. Louisiana.

      Camille F. Gravel, Jr., for petitioners. Jack P. F. Gremillion, Attorney-General of Louisiana, William P. Schuler, Second Assistant Attorney General, Harry H. Howard, Assistant Attorney General, and Lawrence L. McNamara for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. La. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 546.
    Heine v. New Hampshire.

      Richard R. Fernald for petitioner. George S. Pappagianis, Attorney General of New Hampshire, and David H. Souter, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. N. H. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 26.
    Allen et al. v. Hardin, Secretary of Agriculture, et al.

      Charles P. Ryan and Edward J. Ryan for petitioners. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Weisl, Alan S. Rosenthal, and Walter H. Fleischer for Hardin, and Lawrence D. Hollman and Carlyle C. Ring, Jr., for Zuber et al., respondents.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.

The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 668.
    Boroski v. United States.

      Kenneth S. Jacobs for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, Jerome M. Feit, and Edward Fenig for the United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 766.
    Kauffman v. Secretary of the Air Force.

      Leonard B. Boudin, Victor Rabinowitz, and David Rein for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Yeagley, Kevin T. Maroney, and Robert L. Keuch for respondent.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 420.
    Jones v. Jones et al.

      William J. Scott, Attorney General of Illinois, and Francis T. Crowe, Herman Tavins, and A. Zola Groves, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondents McCormick et al.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Motion to dispense with printing petition for certiorari granted. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 639.
    Berkman v. United States.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Walters, Joseph M. Howard, and John P. Burke for the United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Motion to dispense with printing petition for certiorari granted. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 495.
    Wainwright, Corrections Director v. Barton.

      Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and Morton J. Hamlon, Assistant Attorney General, for petitioner. Robert E. Jagger and Carleton L. Weidemeyer for respondent.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 647.
    McRoberts v. United States.

      Ellis J. Horvitz for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold for the United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 693.
    Habig et al. v. United States.

      Fred P. Bamberger, Alan W. Boyd, and Anton Dimitroff for petitioners. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Walters, and Joseph M. Howard for the United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 669.
    Ruffalo v. Mahoning County Bar Assn.

      Eugene Gressman for petitioner. Thomas V. Koykka and Edward R. Brown for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Ohio. Motion to use record and appendix in No. 73, October Term, 1967 [In re Ruffalo, 390 U. S. 544], granted. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted. Mr. Justice Stewart took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and petition.


text:
    No. 739.
    Osborn v. United States.

      Maclin P. Davis, Jr., for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold for the United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 674.
    Henry I. Siegel Co., Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board et al.

      Osmond K. Fraenkel for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, and Norton J. Come for National Labor Relations Board, and Jacob Sheinkman for Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, AFL-CIO, respondents.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.

The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 752.
    Matzner et al. v. Brown, Judge.

      F. Lee Bailey for petitioners. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney-General of New Jersey, and Elias Abelson, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Brennan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 63,
    Misc.
    Moore v. California.

      Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Doris H. Maier, Assistant Attorney General, and Edward W. Bergtholdt, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 151,
    Misc.
    Wane v. California.

      Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and Russell Iungerich, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 124,
    Misc.
    Bryant v. California.

      Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, and Edsel W. Haws and Willard F. Jones, Deputy Attorneys General, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 162,
    Misc.
    Park v. California Adult Authority et al.

      Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Albert W. Harris, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, and Deraid E. Granberg and Charles R. B. Kirk, Deputy Attorneys General, for respondents.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 217,
    Misc.
    Vaughn v. California.

      Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and Frederick R. Millar, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
   Ct. App. Cal., 4th Jud. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 259,
    Misc.
    Cotton v. United States.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Kirby W. Patterson for the United States.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 515,
    Misc.
    Nicholls v. Illinois.

      Walter D. Williams for petitioner. William J. Scott, Attorney General of Illinois, and Joel M. Flaum, Thomas J. Immel, and Roger C. Nauert, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Ill. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 770,
    Misc.
    Madrid v. Arizona.

      Gary K. Nelson, Attorney General of Arizona, and Carl Waag, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   Ct. App. Ariz. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 551,
    Misc.
    Brown, aka Morris v. United States.

      John Powers Crowley for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold for the United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 672,
    Misc.
    Stephens v. Virginia.

      Henry W. McLaughlin III for petitioner. J. Willard Greer for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. App. Va. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 726,
    Misc.
    Rakshys v. Pennsylvania.
   Sup. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 748,
    Misc.
    Chromiak v. Field, Men’s Colony Superintendent.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 777,
    Misc.
    Broadhead v. United States.

      Myron J. Hack for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, Jerome M. Feit, and Edward Fenig for the United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 799,
    Misc.
    Williams v. United States.

      Leonard R. Mellon for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Roger A. Pauley for the United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 804,
    Misc.
    Oblatore v. Brauner.

      Maximilian Bader and I. Walton Bader for petitioner.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 840,
    Misc.
    Vivero et al. v. United States.

      Albert J. Krieger for petitioners. Solicitor General Griswold for the United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 809,
    Misc.
    Black v. United States.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Kirby W. Patterson for the United States.
   C. A. 6th. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 831,
    Misc.
    Baker v. United States.

      Robert G. Pugh for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Marshall Tamor Golding for the United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 872,
    Misc.
    Sisk v. United States.

      Thomas McKinney, Jr., for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold for the United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 874,
    Misc.
    Swift v. New York.

      Matthew Muraskin for petitioner. William Cahn and Jules Orenstein for respondent.
   App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 2d Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 888,
    Misc.
    Green v. Pate, Warden.

      Joseph A. Marino for petitioner.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 918,
    Misc.
    Norman v. United States.
    J. B. Tietz for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, Jerome M. Feit, and Robert G. Maysack for the United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 939,
    Misc.
    Brill et al. v. Ohio.

      John J. Callahan for petitioners.
   Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 935,
    Misc.
    Culotta v. United States.

      Robert S. Rif kind for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold for the United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 951,
    Misc.
    Anthony v. United States.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, Jerome M. Feit, and Robert G. Maysack for the United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 966,
    Misc.
    Gibson v. Washington.

      James E. Kennedy for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Wash. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 967,
    Misc.
    Webb v. Beto, Corrections Director.

      Ernest E. Figari, Jr., for petitioner. Crawford C. Martin, Attorney General of Texas, Nola White, First Assistant Attorney General, Robert C. Flowers and Gilbert J. Pena, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 968,
    Misc.
    Ronstadt v. California.
   Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 972,
    Misc.
    Kelley v. United States.

      Solicitor General Griswold for the United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 973,
    Misc.
    Johnson v. United States.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Kirby W. Patterson for the United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 982,
    Misc.
    Jaegers v. California.

      DeWitt F. Blase for petitioner.
   Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 983,
    Misc.
    Smith v. California.

      Kate Whyner for petitioner.
   Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 986,
    Misc.
    Eli v. California.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 994,
    Misc.
    Marvel v. United States.

      Solicitor General Griswold for the United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 996,
    Misc.
    Tellis v. Hocker, Warden.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1003,
    Misc.
    Chambers et ux. v. Colonial Pipeline Co.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1004,
    Misc.
    Stevens v. Nelson, Warden, et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1008,
    Misc.
    Maroscia v. Dispatch Printing Co. et al.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1011,
    Misc.
    Eaton v. United States.

      Solicitor General Griswold for the United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1023,
    Misc.
    Logan v. New York.
   Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1013,
    Misc.
    Laughlin v. United States.

      David E. Wagoner for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, Jerome M. Feit, and Roger A. Pauley for the United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1025,
    Misc.
    Miller et al. v. Louisiana.
   Sup. Ct. La. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1026,
    Misc.
    Conover v. Herold, State Hospital Director.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1028,
    Misc.
    Phillips v. California.

      Frank O. Wal-ther for petitioner.
   Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1029,
    Misc.
    Arnold v. United States.

      Solicitor General Griswold for the United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1031,
    Misc.
    Owens v. New Jersey.

      Morton Stavis for petitioner.
   Sup. Ct. N. J. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1033,
    Misc.
    Cooper et al. v. New Jersey.

      Gerald T. Foley, Jr., for petitioners.
   Sup. Ct. N. J. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1036,
    Misc.
    Warriner v. Fernandez et al.
   Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 3d Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1040,
    Misc.
    Bartlett, Guardian v. Hollopeter.

      Arthur R. Cline for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1039,
    Misc.
    Rogers v. California Adult Authority et al.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1041,
    Misc.
    Roberts v. Alaska.

      G. Kent Edwards, Attorney General of Alaska, and Robert K. Yandell for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Alaska. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1044,
    Misc.
    Corrado et ux. v. Providence Redevelopment Agency et al.

      Timothy J. McCarthy and Vincent Pallozzi for respondents.
   Sup. Ct. R. I. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1056,
    Misc.
    Lee v. United States.

      Sam Adam and Charles B. Evins for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold for the United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1057,
    Misc.
    Neal v. United States.

      Mark I. Harrison for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold for the United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1058,
    Misc.
    Czako v. Maroney, Correctional Superintendent.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1065,
    Misc.
    Holland v. Coiner, Warden.
   Sup. Ct. App. W. Ya. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1067,
    Misc.
    Smith v. Nelson, Warden.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1070,
    Misc.
    Wharton v. Crouse, Warden.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1071,
    Misc.
    White v. United States.

      Solicitor General Griswold for the United States.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1072,
    Misc.
    Lyon v. United States.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Roger A. Pauley for the United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1073,
    Misc.
    McAlvain v. Arizona.

      Gary K. Nelson, Attorney-General of Arizona, and Carl Waag, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Ariz. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1075,
    Misc.
    Stephens v. Field, Men’s Colony Superintendent.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1081,
    Misc.
    Gabriel et vir v. Immigration and Naturalization Service.

      Richard W. Lowery for petitioners.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, and Beatrice Rosenberg for respondent.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1082,
    Misc.
    Johnson v. Sard et al.

      Solicitor General Griswold for respondents.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1083,
    Misc.
    Ortega v. Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1084,
    Misc.
    Gross v. Craven, Warden.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1087,
    Misc.
    Mitchell v. United States.

      John J. Cleary for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, Jerome M. Feit, and Edward Fenig for the United States.
   C. A. 7th. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1088,
    Misc.
    Hill v. Craven, Warden.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1090,
    Misc.
    Rogers v. North Carolina.

      Robert Morgan, Attorney General of North Carolina, and Ralph Moody, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. N. C. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1093,
    Misc.
    Hamilton, aka Lipscomb v. Alabama.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1099,
    Misc.
    Boone et al. v. Wyman, Commissioner, Department of Social Services of New York, et al.

      Jonathan Weiss for petitioners. J. Lee Rankin and Stanley Buchs-baum for respondents.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1100,
    Misc.
    Haynes v. United States.

      Ernest E. Figari, Jr., for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold for the United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1104,
    Misc.
    McGurrin v. Shovlin, Hospital Superintendent, et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1114,
    Misc.
    Reyes v. California.
   Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1106,
    Misc.
    Chupich v. Illinois.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1109,
    Misc.
    Collins v. United States.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, Jerome M. Feit, and Kirby W. Patterson for the United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1115,
    Misc.
    Blankenship v. Norvell, Warden.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1117,
    Misc.
    Anthony v. New York.
   App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 4th Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1119,
    Misc.
    Walters v. Cox, Penitentiary Superintendent.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1120,
    Misc.
    Saunders v. Michigan Parole Board.

      Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General of Michigan, Robert A. Deren-goski, Solicitor General, and Stewart H. Freeman, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Mich. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1122,
    Misc.
    Newlin v. Superior Court of Arizona, County of Maricopa, et al.
   Sup. Ct. Ariz. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1125,
    Misc.
    Rogers v. Schmidt, Secretary of Wisconsin Department of Health and Social Services.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1130,
    Misc.
    Cline v. United States.

      Solicitor General Griswold for the United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1121,
    Misc.
    Evans v. Cupp, Warden.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1127,
    Misc.
    Taylor v. Cady, Warden.
   Sup.Ct. Wis. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1128,
    Misc.
    Johns v. Nelson, Warden.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1131,
    Misc.
    Brown v. Keith.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1134,
    Misc.
    Gilmore v. Craven, Warden.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1136,
    Misc.
    Huskey v. Craven, Warden.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1143,
    Misc.
    Grix v. Herold, State Hospital Director.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1145,
    Misc.
    Rountree v. California.
   Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1148,
    Misc.
    McDaniels v. California.
   Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1153,
    Misc.
    Parrish v. Beto, Corrections Director.

      Crawford C. Martin, Attorney General of Texas, Nola White, First Assistant Attorney General, and Robert C. Flowers and Lonny F. Zwiener, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1157,
    Misc.
    Mink v. Kent, U. S. District Judge.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1160,
    Misc.
    Cagle v. Ciccone, U. S. Medical Center Director.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1233,
    Misc.
    Seward v. United States.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Robert G. Maysack for the United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1242,
    Misc.
    Mink v. Harrison, Corrections Director.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1257,
    Misc.
    Flemming v. Wainwright, Corrections Director.

      Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and Charles W. Musgrove, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1276,
    Misc.
    Pergolizzi et al. v. New Jersey.
   Super. Ct. N. J. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 11,
    Misc.
    Haden v. United States.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Jerome M. Feit, and Kirby W. Patterson for the United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 20,
    Misc.
    Smith v. United States.

      Frederic A. Johnson and Rudolph Lion Zalowitz for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Edward Fenig for the United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 27,
    Misc.
    McLean v. United States.

      Leon B. Polsky and Phylis Skloot Bamberger for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold for the United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 64,
    Misc.
    Carrigan v. United States.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, and Jerome M. Feit for the United States.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 86,
    Misc.
    Nunley v. United States.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Mervyn Hamburg for the United States.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 157,
    Misc.
    King v. California.

      Hugh R. Manes for petitioner. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and Ronald M. George, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
   Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 391,
    Misc.
    Swift v. Commandant, U. S. Disciplinary Barracks, Fort Leavenworth.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, Jerome M. Feit, and Roger A. Pauley for respondent.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 49,
    Misc.
    Andrews v. United States.

      Solicitor General Griswold for the United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 428,
    Misc.
    Goode v. Sommers.

      Joseph H. H. Kaplan and Harold Buchman for petitioner.
   Baltimore City Ct. Md. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 707,
    Misc.
    Baird v. Massachusetts.

      Robert H. Quinn, Attorney General of Massachusetts, John Wall, Assistant Attorney General, Lawrence P. Cohen, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Garrett H. Byrne, and Joseph Nolan for respondent.
   Sup. Jud. Ct. Mass. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 708,
    Misc.
    Barnes v. New Jersey.

      Richard Newman for petitioner.
   Sup. Ct. N. J. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 898,
    Misc.
    Brown v. Maryland and/or Johnson, Sheriff.

      William M. Kunstler, Jonathan W. Lubell, and Harold Buchman for petitioner.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 975,
    Misc.
    Thessen v. Alaska.

      Joseph H. Shortell for petitioner.

      G. Kent Edwards, Attorney General of Alaska, and Robert K. Yandell for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Alaska. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 896,
    Misc.
    Maloney v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc.

      James C. McKay and Michael Boudin for respondent.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Stewart and Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 995,
    Misc.
    Carr v. United States.

      Darwin Charles Brown for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold for the United States.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.

The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 1124,
    Misc.
    Dearinger v. United States.

      Solicitor General Griswold for the United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 1190,
    Misc., October Term, 1967.
    Ware v. Preston et al.,
   390 U. S. 1032, 391 U. S. 971. Motion for leave to file second petition for rehearing denied.

The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.


text:
    No. 40.
    No. 340.
    No. 434.
    No. 480.
    No. 497.
    Conway v. California Adult Authority et al., Ludwig v. Florida, Johnson v. State Bar of California et al., Arizona Corporation Commission et al. v. United States et al., Union Pacific Railroad Co. et al. v. United States et al.,
   ante, p. 107;

ante, p. 927;

ante, p. 22;

ante, p. 27; and

ante, p. 27. Petitions for rehearing denied.


text:
    No. 507.
    No. 554.
    No. 583.
    No. 160,
    No. 602,
    No. 632,
    No. 658,
    No. 781,
    No. 782,
    No. 843,
    No. 866,
    No. 959,
    No. 978,
    No. 1016,
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Bay Sound Transportation Co. et al. v. United States, Chambers v. Beauchamp, Administrator, et al., Anders v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Jackson v. California, Neely v. United States, Clinton v. California, Lane v. Pucci et al., Dvorsky v. United States, Wolff v. Foley, Wendt v. Dillin et al., Judges, U. S. District Court, Resseguie v. Follette, Warden, Daugherty v. United States et al., Cantrell v. United States, Fletcher v. Maroney, Correctional Superintendent,
   ante, p. 928;

ante, p. 942;

ante, p. 958;

ante, p. 942;

ante, p. 917;

ante, p. 23;

ante, p. 943;

ante, p. 970;

ante, p. 945;

ante, p. 899;

ante, p. 971;

ante, p. 947;

ante, p. 947; and

ante, p. 948. Petitions for rehearing denied.


text:
    No. 368.
    Ward v. Pennsylvania New York Central Transportation Co. et al.,
   ante, p. 849. Motion for leave to file petition for rehearing denied.


text:
    No. 999,
    Misc.
    Harrison v. United States,
   ante, p. 974. Petition for rehearing denied.

The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    January 14, 1970
    No. 944.
    No. 972.
    No. 1003.
    Carter et al. v. West Feliciana Parish School Board et al., Singleton et al. v. Jackson Municipal Separate School District et al., West Feliciana Parish School Board et al. v. Carter et al.,

      John F. Ward, Jr., on the motion.
   ante, p. 290;

ante, p. 290; and

infra. Motion of Louisiana Teachers Assn, for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted.


text:
    No. 1027.
    Jackson Municipal Separate School District et al. v. Singleton et al.

      Robert C. Cannada and Thomas H. Watkins for petitioners.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1042.
    Hinds County School Board et al. v. United States et al.

      A. F. Summer, Attorney General of Mississippi, and John C. Satterfield for petitioners.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1003.
    West Feliciana Parish School Board et al. v. Carter et al.

      John F. Ward, Jr., for petitioners. Mr. Ward for Louisiana Teachers Assn, as amicus curiae in support of the petition.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Motion to dispense with printing petition granted. Certiorari denied.


text:
    January 15, 1970
    No. 649.
    No. 676.
    No. 677.
    Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Grigsby et al.; Coastal Marine Service of Texas, Inc., et al. v. Grigsby et al.; and Welder’s Supply Co. of Lake Charles v. Grigsby et al.

      Fred H. Sievert, Jr., for petitioner in No. 649, Edmund E. Woodley for petitioners in No. 676, and Norman F. Anderson for petitioner in No. 677.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Petitions for writs of certiorari dismissed pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of this Court.

Reported below: 412 F. 2d 1011.


text:
    January 16, 1970
    No. 458.
    Johnson et al. v. Massachusetts,

      Robert E. Smith for applicant.
   ante, p. 990. Application of Joseph M. Palladino, Sr., to stay effectiveness of order denying petition for certiorari as to him, presented to Mr. Justice Brennan, and by him referred to the Court, denied.

Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Douglas, and Mr. Justice Stewart are of the opinion that the application should be granted.


text:
    January 19, 1970
    No. —.
    Avila, aka Gonzalez et al., et al. v. United States.

      Daniel Neal Heller for applicant Avila. Solicitor General Griswold in opposition.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Application for bail pending appeal presented to Mr. Justice Black, and by him referred to the Court, denied.


text:
    No. 41.
    No. 59.
    Choctaw Nation et al. v. Oklahoma et al.; and Cherokee Nation of Tribe of Indians in Oklahoma v. Oklahoma et al.
   C. A. 10th Cir. [Cer-tiorari granted, 394 U. S. 972.] Cases restored to calendar for reargument.


text:
    No. 153.
    McMann, Warden, et al. v. Richardson et al.

      Frank S. Hogan and Michael R. Juviler on the motion. Gretchen White Oberman in opposition.
   C. A. 2d Cir. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 813.] Motion of District Attorney of New York County for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae granted, and a total of 30 minutes allotted for that purpose. Counsel for respondents allotted an additional 30 minutes.


text:
    No. 175.
    Moragne v. States Marine Lines, Inc., et al.

      David B. Kaplan on the latter motion.
   C. A. 5th Cir. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 900.] Motion of Nathan Baker, pro se, for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Motion of American Trial Lawyers Assn, for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted.


text:
    No. 221.
    Hickel, Secretary of the Interior v. Oil Shale Corp. et al.
   C. A. 10th Cir. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 817,] Forty-five minutes allotted to each side for oral argument.

Mr. Justice White and Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this order.


text:
    No. 699,
    Misc.
    Ross v. Harrison, Corrections Director, et al.

      Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General of Michigan, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, and Stewart H. Freeman, Assistant Attorney General, in opposition.
   Motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus denied.


text:
    No. 46.
    United States v. White.
   C. A. 7th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 394 U. S. 957.] Case restored to calendar for reargument.


text:
    No. 305.
    United States v. Sisson.

      William G. Smith on the latter motion.
   Appeal from D. C. Mass. [Probable jurisdiction postponed, ante, p. 812.] One hour allotted to each side for oral argument. Motion of Frank P. Slaninger, pro se, for leave to dispense with printing amicus curiae brief denied. Motion to file a brief as amicus curiae will be granted provided the size of the print and pages of his brief is made to conform with requirements of Rules 39 (1) and (4) of the Rules of this Court. Motion of Los Angeles Selective Service Law Panel for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae denied.


text:
    No. 399.
    Rowan, dba American Book Service, et al. v. United States Post Office Department et al.

      David E. McGiffert on the motion.
   Appeal from D. C. C. D. Cal. [Probable jurisdiction noted, ante, p. 885.] Motion of Direct Mail Advertising Assn., Inc., for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae denied.


text:
    No. 868,
    No. 1442,
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Poteet v. Rundle, Correctional Superintendent; and Watkins v. Wingo, Warden.
   Motions for leave to file petitions for writs of habeas corpus denied.


text:
    No. 226,
    Misc.
    Safeguard Mutual Insurance Co. v. Freedman, U. S. Circuit Judge, et al.

      Malcolm W. Berkowitz and Malcolm H. Waldron, Jr., on the motion.
   Motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus denied.


text:
    No. 730.
    Hill v. California.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. [Cer-tiorari granted, ante, p. 818.] Motion of Keith C. Monroe, pro se, for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted.


text:
    No. 156,
    Misc.
    Williams v. Illinois.

      Jack Greenberg, Michael Meltsner, and Stanley A. Bass for appellant. William J. Scott, Attorney General of Illinois, and James R. Thompson and Joel M. Flaum, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.
   Appeal from Sup. Ct. Ill. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Probable jurisdiction noted and case transferred to appellate docket.


text:
    No. 655.
    Mulloy v. United States.

      Robert Allen Sedler for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, and Philip R. Monahan for the United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 125.
    Martin Marietta Corp. v. Feder et al.

      Samuel E. Gates, Cecil Wray, Jr., and Clark C. Vogel for petitioner. Mordecai Rosenfeld for Feder and Charles Pickett and Edward C. McLean, Jr., for Sperry Rand Corp., respondents. Solicitor General Griswold, Lawrence G. Wallace, Philip A. Loomis, Jr., David Ferber, and Paul Gonson filed a memorandum for the United States, by invitation of the Court, ante, p. 808, in opposition.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 771.
    No. 881.
    Baumel et al. v. Rosen et al.; and Rosen et al. v. Baumel et al.

      Morton E. Yohalem, George Cochran Doub, and Eugene Gressman for petitioners in No. 771. H. Vernon Eney and Robert R. Bair for respondents in No. 771 and for petitioners in No. 881.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Reported below: 412 F. 2d 571.


text:
    No. 773.
    United States v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Walters, Matthew J. Zinn, and Stuart A. Smith for the United States. Robert T. Molloy and John P. Downes for respondent.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 775.
    Narragansett Racing Assn., Inc., et al. v. Berman et al.

      Stanley M. Brown for petitioners.

      J. Fleet Cowden for respondents.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 776.
    Williams-McWilliams, Inc., et al. v. Massey.

      Brunswick G. Deutsch and René H. Himel, Jr., for petitioners.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 777.
    Seven Slot Machines et al. v. Kansas.

      Bobby Wilson Storey for petitioners. Kent Frizzell, Attorney General of Kansas, and J. Richard Foth, Richard H. Seaton, and Edward G. Collister, Jr., Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Kan. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 780.
    Bruner et al. v. Republic Supply Co.

      Robert A. Scardino for petitioners. David T. Searls and John Leroy Jeffers for respondent.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 779.
    Local 282, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America v. National Labor Relations Board.

      Samuel J. Cohen for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, and Norton J. Come for respondent.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 784.
    Schreiber et al., trading as Schreiber & Goldberg v. American Safety Table Co.

      Edwin M. Slote for petitioners. Arthur S. Olick and Leon Edelson for respondent.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 785.
    Shankey et al. v. Staisey et al.

      Thomas B. Sweeney for petitioners. Francis A. Barry and Thomas M. Butter, Jr., for respondents.
   Sup. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 786.
    Zubkoff v. United States.

      Nathan Silverberg for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold for the United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 790.
    Saville v. Bank of America, Executor.

      Owen W. Crum-packer and James E. Knox, Jr., for petitioner. Lowell E. Enslen for respondent.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 791.
    Young et ux. v. Indiana.

      Arthur J. Sullivan for petitioners. Theodore L. Sendak, Attorney General of Indiana,, and William F. Thompson and Walter E. Bravard, Jr., Deputy Attorneys General, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Ind. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 792.
    Kunzman et al. v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.

      Charles S. Vigil for petitioners. James H. Anderson and E. G. Knowles for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Colo. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 795.
    Retail Store Employees Union, Local 954 v. LaSalle & Koch Co.

      Joseph E. Finley for petitioner. Harry L. Browne, Howard F. Sachs, and Merritt W. Green for respondent.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 796.
    Randolph v. California.

      Luke McKissack for petitioner.
   Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 797.
    Louisiana Industries, Inc., et al. v. National Labor Relations Board.

      Ewell Lee Smith, Jr., for petitioners. Solicitor General Griswold, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, Norton J. Come, and Nancy M. Sherman for respondent.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 799.
    Ambers v. United States.

      Charles S. Conley for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, Jerome M. Feit, and Robert G. May sack for the United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 800.
    United Benefit Life Insurance Co. v. McCrory.

      Harold W. Kauffman for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Walters, and Thomas L. Stapleton for respondent.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 802.
    Konigsberg v. Mitchell, Attorney General, et al.

      Frank A. Lopez for petitioner.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 803.
    Ward v. Differding et al.

      Arch N. Bobbitt for petitioner. William M. Osborn for respondents.
   App. Ct. Ind. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 806.
    Fort v. Illinois.

      Marshall Patner for petitioner. Edward V. Hanrahan and Elmer C. Kissane for respondent.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 807.
    National Foundation v. City of Fort Worth.

      Simon H. Rif kind and Gerald D. Stern for petitioner. S. G. Johndroe, Jr., for respondent.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 810.
    State Board of Equalization of California v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.

      Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, James E. Sabine and Ernest P. Goodman, Assistant Attorneys General, and E. Clement Shute, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, for petitioner. Valentine Brookes for respondent.
   Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 793.
    Garrison, District Attorney of the Parish of Orleans v. Sheridan et al.

      Louise Korns for petitioner. Herbert J. Gar on and H. Richard Schumacher for respondents.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.