text:
    No. 818,
    Misc.
    Hazel v. United States.

      Douglas G. Cole for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Julia P. Cooper for the United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


source: Caselaw Access Project

license: Public Domain

text:
    No. 859,
    Misc.
    Garvin v. United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 833,
    Misc.
    Oliver v. Attorney General of the United States.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Door, and David L. Norman for the United States.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 856,
    Misc.
    Burr v. Immigration and Naturalization Service.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Ronald L. Gainer for respondent.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 865,
    Misc.
    Cruz v. Colorado.

      Samuel D. Menin for petitioner. Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General of Colorado, Frank E. Hickey, Deputy Attorney General, and James F. Ramp, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Colo. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 882,
    Misc.
    Boulad v. California.

      Morris La-vine for petitioner.
   Dist. Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 889,
    Misc.
    Glenn v. McMann, Warden.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 901,
    Misc.
    Link v. United States.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 908,
    Misc.
    Ford v. Traynor, Chief Justice, et al.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 894,
    Misc.
    Smith v. Idaho et al.
    Petitioner pro se. Allan G. Shepard, Attorney General of Idaho, and M. Allyn Din-gel, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for respondents.
   Sup. Ct. Idaho. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 902,
    Misc.
    Mohler v. U. S. Board of Parole et al.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Doar and David L. Norman for respondents.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 909,
    Misc.
    Brooks v. United States.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 915,
    Misc.
    McGann v. United States.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 921,
    Misc.
    Toth v. Heinze, Warden, et al.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 922,
    Misc.
    Williams v. California.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 924,
    Misc.
    Machado v. Wilkins, Warden.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 933,
    Misc.
    Thomas v. Ward.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 986,
    Misc.
    Gauthier v. Wisconsin.
   Sup. Ct. Wis. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 950,
    Misc.
    Coleman v. California.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 956,
    Misc.
    Saylor v. Alabama.
    Petitioner pro se. Richmond M. Flowers, Attorney General of Alabama, and Paul T. Gish, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   Ct. App. Ala. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 962,
    Misc.
    Gurganious v. Florida.
   Sup. Ct. Pla. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 982,
    Misc.
    Scott v. La Vina.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 983,
    Misc.
    Williams v. United States.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. Maysack for the United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 991,
    Misc.
    Freedman v. National Maritime Union of America, AFL-CIO, et al.
    Petitioner pro se. Abraham E. Freedman for National Maritime Union of America, AFL-CIO, and Alfred Giardino for American Export Isbrandt-sen Lines, Inc., respondents.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 993,
    Misc.
    Turpin v. Maxwell, Warden.
   Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 996,
    Misc.
    Leach v. United States.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.
   C. A. D. C. Cir.

Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 994,
    Misc.
    Nelson v. Illinois.

      Sam Adam for petitioner.
   Sup. Ct. Ill. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 995,
    Misc.
    Reickauer v. Peyton, Penitentiary Superintendent.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1001,
    Misc.
    Ciampini v. Maroney, Correctional Superintendent.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1005,
    Misc.
    Taylor v. Ohio.
   Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1009,
    Misc.
    Michaels v. United States.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.
   Ct. Cl. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1010,
    Misc.
    Hayes v. New York.
    Petitioner pro se. Frank S. Hogan and John A. K. Bradley for respondent.
   Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1011,
    Misc.
    Green v. Rhay, Penitentiary Superintendent.
   Sup. Ct. Wash. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1013,
    Misc.
    Cason v. Florida.
   Sup. Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1014,
    Misc.
    Currie v. Florida.
   Sup. Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1015,
    Misc.
    Pearce v. Cox, Warden.
   Sup. Ct. N. M. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1016,
    Misc.
    Brinkley v. Cox, Warden.
   Sup. Ct. N. M. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1019,
    Misc.
    Rhodes v. Jones.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1020,
    Misc.
    Garrison v. Florida.
   Sup. Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1021,
    Misc.
    Ware v. United States.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1024,
    Misc.
    Bogan v. Wilkins, Warden.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1031,
    Misc.
    Silva v. Cox, Warden.

      James A. Williams and John W. Low for petitioner.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1032,
    Misc.
    Mott v. Florida.
   Sup. Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1041,
    Misc.
    Spry v. Oberhauser.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1042,
    Misc.
    Stiltner v. Washington.
   Super. Ct. Wash., Lewis County. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1046,
    Misc.
    Devlin v. Florida.
   Sup. Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1048,
    Misc.
    Fojon v. United States.

      Thomas J. Brady for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. Maysack for the United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1054,
    Misc.
    Darrah v. Illinois.

      John R. Snively for petitioner.
   Sup. Ct. Ill. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1055,
    Misc.
    DeMary v. Pate, Warden.
   Cir. Ct. of Will County, Ill. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1056,
    Misc.
    Brewer v. Pennsylvania Board of Parole et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1057,
    Misc.
    Dedmon v. California et al.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1059,
    Misc.
    Kingston v. California et al.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1065,
    Misc.
    Cordova v. Wilson, Warden, et al.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1070,
    Misc.
    Barnes v. Beto, Corrections Director.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1072,
    Misc.
    Pratt v. California.
   Dist. Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1076,
    Misc.
    Scott v. California District Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1087,
    Misc.
    Robinson v. Michigan.
   Sup. Ct. Mich. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1088,
    Misc.
    Braun v. Wilson, Warden.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1099,
    Misc.
    Hays v. California Adult Authority.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1139,
    Misc.
    Wager v. New York.
   Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1103,
    Misc.
    Cross v. Kenton, Warden.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall for respondent.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1125,
    Misc.
    Coronado v. United States.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1178,
    Misc.
    Machado v. New York.
    Petitioner pro se. Nat H. Hemtel and Benj. J. Jacobson for respondent.
   Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1179,
    Misc.
    Crawford v. Davis et al.

      Thomas B. Rutter for petitioner.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 187,
    Misc.
    McIlvaine et al. v. Louisiana.
    Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.

      Maurice R. Woulje for petitioners. Jack P. F. Gremillion, Attorney General of Louisiana, William P. Schuler, Assistant Attorney General, and Jim Garrison for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. La. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 223,
    Misc.
    Young v. New York.
    Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.
    Petitioner pro se. William I. Siegel for respondent.
   Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 505,
    Misc.
    Engberg v. Kansas.
    Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.
    Petitioner pro se. Robert C. Londerholm, Attorney General of Kansas, and J. Richard Foth and Richard H. Seaton, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Kan. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 336,
    Misc.
    Howell v. Oregon.
    Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.
    Petitioner pro se. Robert J. Elfers for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Ore. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 432.
    No. 614.
    No. 616.
    No. 632.
    No. 660.
    No. 1,
    No. 15,
    No. 668,
    No. 697,
    No. 772,
    No. 773,
    No. 794,
    No. 807,
    No. 838,
    No. 898,
    No. 978,
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Holmes et al. v. Eddy et al., Nehring v. Gerrity, Easter v. Ziff et al., Scalza v. United States, Jones, Administrator v. United States, Stello v. Pennsylvania, Gillentine v. United States, Herr et al. v. United States; Trantino v. New Jersey, Bowden v. California Adult Authority et al., Vida v. Roth, U. S. District Judge, Skolnick v. Hallett et al., Eskridge v. Rhay, Penitentiary Superintendent, Furtak v. New York, McGann v. Richardson, Warden, et al., McIntosh v. United States, Zanca v. Maimonides Hospital,
   382 U. S. 892;

382 U. S. 202;

382 U. S. 957;

382 U. S. 973;

382 U. S. 975;

382 U. S. 988;

382 U. S. 999, sub nom.

382 U. S. 993;

382 U. S. 965;

382 U. S. 996;

382 U. S. 996;

382 U. S. 996;

382 U. S. 997;

382 U. S. 1007;

382 U. S. 1029; and

382 U. S. 1020. Petitions for rehearing denied.


text:
    No. 709.
    No. 733.
    Muth, Administratrix v. Atlass et al., Executors; and Darr, Administratrix v. Atlass et al., Executors,
   382 U. S. 988. Motion of American Trial Lawyers Association for leave to file brief, as amicus curiae, in support of the petition for rehearing, granted. Petition for rehearing denied.


text:
    No. 1044,
    No. 494,
    October Term, 1962.
    October Term, 1964.
    Wapnick v. United States, Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen et al. v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co.,
   374 U. S. 829, 375 U. S. 871; and

379 U. S. 934, 986. Motions for leave to file second petitions for rehearing denied.

Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.


text:
    No. 402,
    No. 518,
    No. 524,
    Mise.
    Mise.
    Mise.
    Fjellhammer v. United States et al., Birdsell v. United States, Hernandez v. California,
   382 U. S. 869;

382 U. S. 963; and

382 U. S. 909. Motions for leave to file petitions for rehearing denied.


text:
    February 28, 1966.
    No. 968.
    Bell v. Texas.
    It is ordered that Tom R. Scott, Esquire, of Midland, Texas, be, and he is hereby, appointed to serve as counsel for the petitioner in this case.
   Ct. Crim. App. Tex.

(Certiorari granted, 382 U. S. 1023.) Motion for appointment of counsel granted.


text:
    No. 1061,
    Misc.
    General Sani-Can Manufacturing Corp. v. United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois et al.

      Morris Kirschstein for petitioner. Fred S. Lockwood for respondents.
   Motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus denied.


text:
    No. 824.
    Abbott Laboratories et al. v. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, et al.

      Gerhard A. Gesell, Stanley L. Temko, Lloyd N. Cutler, Marshall Hornblower, C. Joseph Stetler, Alexander L. Nichols and William S. Megonigal, Jr., for petitioners. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and William W. Goodrich for respondents.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 870.
    United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Federal Power Commission et al.

      Vernon W. Woods and Saunders Gregg for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Richard A. Solomon and Howard E. Wahrenbrock for the Federal Power Commission, and Lloyd F. Thanhouser and Bruce R. Merrill for Continental Oil Co., respondents.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 921.
    Howard v. Kentucky.

      John Y. Brown for petitioner. Robert Matthews, Attorney General of Kentucky, and Charles W. Runyan, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   Ct. App. Ky. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 206,
    Misc.
    Long v. District Court of Iowa, in and for Lee County.
    Petitioner pro se. Lawrence F. Scalise, Attorney General of Iowa, and Don R. Bennett, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Iowa. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of certiorari is also granted limited to the following question:

“Did the refusal of the state trial court to provide a transcript for the petitioner, solely because state law made no provision for furnishing of a transcript without the payment of a fee, deny the petitioner the opportunity to obtain full appellate review of the trial court’s denial of the petitioner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus and thereby deprive the petitioner of the equal protection of the laws?”

Casé transferred to appellate docket.


text:
    No. 684.
    Sid Richardson Carbon & Gasoline Co. v. Moore Co. of Sikeston, Missouri, et al.

      Rufus S. Garrett, Jr., for petitioner. Paul B. Rava and John H. Lashly for respondents.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 822.
    England v. Automatic Canteen Co. of America.

      Lyman Brownfield and Phillip K. Folk for petitioner. Earl F. Morris and Kenneth E. Scranton for respondent.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 829.
    City of Columbus v. Royal et al.

      Alba L. Whiteside for petitioner. James C. Britt for respondents.
   Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 832.
    World Airways, Inc., et al. v. National Mediation Board et al.

      Jerome C. Byrne for petitioners. Solicitor General Marshall for respondents.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 851.
    Brennan v. Grover et al.
    Petitioner pro se. Charles E. Grover, pro se, and for other respondents.
   Sup. Ct. Colo. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 861.
    Forgett v. United States.

      Charles J. Irwin and Eugene Gress-man for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Donald I. Bierman for the United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 888.
    United Biscuit Co. of America v. Federal Trade Commission.

      William Simon, John Bodner, Jr., and Clarence H. Ross for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Milton J. Grossman, James Mcl. Henderson and Miles J. Brown for respondent.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 903.
    Broderick & Bascom Rope Co. v. Mangan.

      Alvin G. Hubbard and Reese Hubbard for petitioner. James A. Dooley for respondent.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 904.
    Nesbitt v. United States.

      C. D. Ellison for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Weisl, S. Billingsley Hill and Elizabeth Dudley for the United States.
   Ct. Cl. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 905.
    Tibbetts v. Knowles.

      Charles S. Grover and James W. Dent for petitioner. Wilfred S. Stone and Leo A. Rosetta for respondent.
   C. C. P. A. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 907.
    Philipp v. Washington et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 911.
    La Placa v. United States.

      Francis J. DiMento for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 913.
    International Association of Machinists et al. v. Jeffrey Galion Manufacturing Co.

      Russell H. Volkema for petitioners. /. Walston Werum for respondent.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 914.
    Spink v. Ohio.

      Myra Spink for petitioner.
   Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 926.
    Salemi v. Duffy Construction Corp.

      John Maktos, P. D. Maktos and Moses Krislov for petitioner. Ashley M. Van Duzer for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 892.
    Rocha v. Immigration and Naturalization Service.

      Antonio de J. Cardozo for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall for respondent.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 910.
    Simler v. Conner et al.

      John B. Ogden for petitioner. Leslie L. Conner, pro se, and James M. Little for respondent Conner.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 704.
    Hillegas v. Sams, County Attorney for Lowndes County, Mississippi, et al.

      Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III, Anthony G. Amsterdam, R. Jess Brown and Jack H. Young for petitioner. Joe T. Patterson, Attorney General of Mississippi, and William A. Allain, Assistant Attorney General, for respondents.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 856.
    Lord et al. v. Helmandollar et al.

      Jose del Castillo, Gervasio G. Sese and Cornelio 0. Lopez for petitioners. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Weisl, S. Billingsley Hill and Raymond N. Zagone for respondents.
    Mr. Justice Black is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted and the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit reversed.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 556,
    No. 633,
    Mise.
    Mise.
    Pagano v. United States; and Castellana et al. v. United States.

      Daniel H. Greenberg for petitioner in No. 556, Mise. Nathan Kestnbaum for petitioners in No. 633, Mise.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 989,
    Mise.
    Holland v. United States.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 563,
    Misc.
    Varnadoe v. Illinois.

      Gerald W. Getty and James J. Do-herty for petitioner. William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, and Richard A. Michael and Philip J. Rock, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Ill. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 903,
    Misc.
    Edwards v. United States.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Mervyn Hamburg for the United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 979,
    Misc.
    Reeves v. United States.

      Daniel H. Greenberg for petitioner. Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. Maysack for the United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1008,
    Misc.
    Moon v. United States.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1094,
    Misc.
    Cota v. Arizona.
   Sup. Ct. Ariz. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1104,
    Misc.
    Edgerton v. North Carolina.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1118,
    Misc.
    McCaffrey v. Blackwell, Warden.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Doar and David L. Norman for respondent.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1095,
    Misc.
    Simari v. Wilkins, Warden.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1121,
    Misc.
    Sheldon v. Nebraska.
   Sup. Ct. Neb. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1124,
    Misc.
    Kinmon v. Kentucky.
   Ct. App. Ky. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1133,
    Misc.
    Oppenheimer v. California.
   Dist. Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1136,
    Misc.
    Di Palermo v. United States.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1140,
    Misc.
    Wilson v. New York.
    Petitioner pro se. Frank S. Hogan and Malvina H. Guggenheim for respondent.
   App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 1st Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1145,
    Misc.
    Wells v. Texas et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1146,
    Misc.
    Ortega v. Kropp, Warden.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1159,
    Misc.
    McIntosh v. Stephenson et al.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall for respondents.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1164,
    Misc.
    Cantrell v. California Adult Authority et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1168,
    Misc.
    Flanagan v. California.
   Dist. Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1169,
    Misc.
    Postell v. Wilson, Warden, et al.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 715.
    No. 755.
    No. 169,
    No. 746,
    No. 944,
    Mise.
    Mise.
    Mise.
    St. Louis Mailers’ Union Local No. 3 v. Globe-Democrat Publishing Co., Frazier v. California, Stiltner v. Rhay, Penitentiary Superintendent, Eldridge v. United States, Mundt et al. v. Home Federal Savings & Loan Association et al.,
   382 U. S. 979;

382 U. S. 988;

382 U. S. 1012;

382 U. S. 994; and

382 U. S. 1019. Petitions for rehearing denied.


text:
    No. 52.
    Tehan, Sheriff v. United States ex rel. Shott,
   382 U. S. 406. Petition for rehearing denied.

The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    March 7, 1966.
    No. 1192,
    No. 1214,
    No. 1245,
    No. 1264,
    No. 1268,
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    McDonald v. Rhay, Penitentiary Superintendent; Smith v. Maxwell, Warden; Smith v. Myers, Correctional Superintendent; Robinson v. State Hospital Director; and Cummings v. Florida.
   Motions for leave to file petitions for writs of habeas corpus denied.


text:
    No. 20.
    Carnation Co. v. Pacific Westbound Conference et al.,
   ante, p. 213.

It is ordered that the opinion of the Court in this case handed down on February 28, 1966, is amended as follows:

(1) By striking that portion of the last paragraph on page eight of the slip opinion commencing with the words “Even if” and concluding with the words “Court of Appeals’ decision” in the first line of page nine;

(2) By striking the first, third, and fourth sentences of the paragraph commencing on page nine and concluding on page ten, and adding the following “An appeal from the Cdhimission’s decision is now pending.” after the sentence commencing “The Commission completed” in said paragraph;

(3) By striking the words “for a determination of the antitrust issues.” from the last paragraph of the opinion and substituting therefor the words “with instructions to stay the action pending the final outcome of the Shipping Act proceedings and then to proceed in a manner consistent with this opinion.”


text:
    No. 752,
    Misc.
    Reyes v. Klinger et al.
   Motion for leave to file petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that the motion for leave to file should be granted.


text:
    No. 1226,
    No. 1255,
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Farnsworth v. Turner, Warden; and Furtak v. Wilkins, Warden.
   Motions for leave to file petitions for writs of habeas corpus denied. Treating the papers submitted as petitions for writs of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


text:
    No. 1210,
    Misc.
    Duval v. United States.
   Motion for leave to file petition for writ of prohibition denied.


text:
    No. 73. No. 74. No. 75. No. 76. No. 77.
    United States v. Grinnell Corp. et al.; Grinnell Corp. v. United States; American District Telegraph Co. v. United States; Holmes Electric Protective Co. v. United States; and Automatic Fire Alarm Co. of Delaware v. United States.

      Denis G. Mclnemey for Grinnell Corp., Macdonald Flinn for American District Telegraph Co., Bud G. Holman for Holmes Electric Protective Co., and J. Francis Hayden for Automatic Fire Alarm Co. of Delaware, on the motion.
   Appeals from D. C. R. I. (Probable jurisdiction noted, 381 U. S. 910.) Motion for additional time for oral argument and for leave to have more than two attorneys participate in oral argument granted. One and one-half hours allotted to each side and four attorneys permitted to participate in oral argument for appellants.


text:
    No. 695.
    Collier v. United States.

      Solicitor General Marshall for the United States, on the motion. Petitioner pro se in opposition.
   C. A. 6th Cir.

(Certiorari granted, 382 U. S. 890.) Motion of the United States to vacate and remand for further consideration denied.


text:
    No. 366.
    McCullough Tool Co. et al. v. Well Surveys, Inc., et al.

      Edward S. Irons, B. Welton Whann, James E. Harrington and Richard B. McDermott' for petitioners. Robert W. Fulwider, Rufus S. Day, Jr., and Robert J. Woolsey for respondents.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 154.
    Servo Corp. of America v. General Electric Co.

      Thomas F. Reddy, Jr., and Roy C. Hopwood for petitioner. Charles H. Walker, Leonard G. Muse and Frank W. Rogers for respondent.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 499.
    Outboard Marine Corp. v. Holley.

      S. Lawrence Wheeler for petitioner. Charles B. Spangenberg for respondent.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 572.
    Allbright-Nell Co. et al. v. Schnell et al.

      Richard D. Mason and M. Hudson Rathburn for petitioners. Charles J. Merriam and Norman M. Shapiro for respondents.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 612.
    M. B. Skinner Co. v. Continental Industries, Inc.

      Charles J. Merriam and Norman M. Shapiro for petitioner. Richard B. McDermott for respondent.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 764.
    American Air Filter Co., Inc. v. Continental Air Filters, Inc.

      Albert C. Johnston for petitioner. Carl F. Schaffer for respondent.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 900.
    Nello L. Teer Co. v. United States.

      Joseph C. Wells and Paul M. Rhodes for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Douglas, David L. Rose and Jack H. Weiner for the United States. Travis Brown for Associated General Contractors of America, as amicus curiae, in support of the petition.
   Ct. Cl. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 765.
    Jett v. United States.

      John Jay Hooker, Jr., and William R. Willis, Jr., for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Acting Assistant Attorney General Roberts, Joseph M. Howard and John P. Burke for the United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 772.
    Felburn v. New York Central Railroad Co. et al.

      Albert R. Teare and Donald A. Teare for petitioner. Daniel L. Morris and John F. Dolan for respondents.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 846.
    Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Estate of Borax et al.

      Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Acting Assistant Attorney General Roberts, Robert N. Anderson and Gilbert E. Andrews for petitioner. Julius G. Hirsch for Estate of Borax et al. and Gerald H. Ullman for Wondsel, respondents.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 891.
    Anderson et al. v. Shuford.

      Robert C. Hawley for petitioners. William H. Erickson for respondent.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 917.
    Estate of Mater v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

      Edward S. Bentley for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, C. Moxley Featherston and Meyer Rothwacks for respondent.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 927.
    Panczko v. United States.

      Melvin B. Lewis and Julius Lucius Echeles for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 915.
    W. E. Grace Manufacturing Co. et al. v. Bros Inc.

      Charming L. Richards for petitioners. Andrew E. Carlsen for respondent.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 925.
    Chandler, U. S. District Judge v. Texaco, Inc.

      Gus Rinehart for petitioner. George W. Jansen for respondent.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 929.
    Commonwealth Oil Refining Co., Inc. v. Martinez et al.

      Stuart Rothman and Rubén Rodriguez-Antongiorgi for petitioner.
   Sup. Ct. P. R. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 930.
    Dicker et al. v. United States.

      George Cochran Doub, Sheldon E. Bernstein and Thomas A. Flannery for petitioners. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Weisl, S. Billingsley Hill and A. Donald Mileur for the United States.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 943.
    Rangen, Inc., et al. v. Sterling Nelson & Sons, Inc.

      Peter W. Billings for petitioners. Paul H. Ray for respondent.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 976.
    Kam Hon Ho et al. v. Kam Moon Kam et al.

      Leon L. M. Chun and W. Y. Char for petitioners. Herbert Y. C. Choy for respondents.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 983.
    Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Alaska Airlines, Inc.

      Bernard M. Shanley for petitioner. William J. Junkerman for respondent.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 966.
    Hearst Corp., Baltimore News American Division v. Local Union No. 24, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO.

      Theodore Sherbow and William A. Agee for petitioner. Thomas X. Dunn for respondent.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 997.
    Worthington Corp. v. Lease Management, Inc.

      Ronald A. Jacks for petitioner. Edward D. Wells for respondent.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 936.
    Beaver et al. v. United States.
    Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted. Thaddeus Rojek for petitioners.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Weisl, Roger P. Marquis and Elizabeth Dudley for the United States. Darrell F. Smith, Attorney General, and Dale R. Shumway, Special Assistant Attorney General, for the State of Arizona, as amicus curiae, in support of the petition.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 362,
    Misc.
    James v. Wainwright, Corrections Director.
    Petitioner pro se. Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and James G. Mahorner, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 639,
    Misc.
    Grizzell v. Florida.
    Petitioner pro se. Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and T. T. Turnbull, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 765,
    Misc.
    Brown v. Cavell, Penitentiary Superintendent.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 424,
    Misc.
    Perez v. Wainwright, Corrections Director.
    Petitioner pro se. Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, James G. Mahorner, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 555,
    Misc.
    Thomas v. Florida.
    Petitioner pro se. Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and John S. Burton, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 608,
    Misc.
    Fazio v. Fay, Warden.
    Petitioner pro se. Louis J. Lejko-witz, Attorney General of New York, and Mortimer Sattler, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent,
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 846,
    Misc.
    Benton v. California.
    Petitioner pro se. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, and Robert R. Granucci and Michael J. Phelan, Deputy Attorneys General, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1068,
    Misc.
    Owens v. Heinze, Warden.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1069,
    Misc.
    Lynn et al. v. Kentucky.
   Ct. App. Ky. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1081,
    Misc.
    Pinch v. Maxwell, Warden.
   Sup.

Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1113,
    Misc.
    Tarin v. United States.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1077,
    Misc.
    Overby v. New York.
   Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1082,
    Misc.
    Caruso v. Fay, Warden.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1083,
    Misc.
    Stevens v. Ohio.
   Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1084,
    Misc.
    Brown v. New York.
   Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1132,
    Misc.
    In re Santana.
   Sup. Ct. P. R. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1193,
    Misc.
    Rodriguez v. New York.
    Petitioner pro se. Michael Juviler for respondent.
   App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y.., 1st Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1148,
    Misc.
    Rhodes v. Meyer et al.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari and other relief denied.


text:
    No. 816.
    No. 732,
    No. 896,
    No. 931,
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Mise.
    Government Employees Insurance Co. v. United States, Vasquez-Ochoa v. United States, Odell v. State Department of Public Welfare of Wisconsin et al., Parker v. Board of Education, Prince George's County, Maryland,
   382 U. S. 1026;

382 U. S. 1027;

382 U. S. 420; and

382 U. S. 1030. Petitions for rehearing denied.


text:
    No. 593.
    Koehring Co. v. Hyde Construction Co., Inc., et al.,
   382 U. S. 362. Petition for rehearing and motion to amend the order of remand denied.


text:
    No. 255,
    October Term, 1963.
    Bros Incorporated v. Browning Manufacturing Co. et al.,
   375 U. S. 825. Motion for leave to file petition for rehearing denied.

Mr. Justice Eortas took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.


text:
    March 10, 1966.
    No. 159.
    Chicago & North Western Railway Co. et al. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. et al.

      Nuel D. Belnap, Richard M. Freeman, Bryce L. Hamilton, Raymond K. Merrill, Nye F. Morehouse, John W. Adams, Martin L. Cassell and Frank R. Johnston for appellants. Douglas F. Smith, Howard J. Trienens, George L. Saunders, Jr., John E. McCullough, S. R. Brit-tingham, Jr., Monroe E. Clinton, Frank S. Farrell, Lawrence W. Hobhs, L. E. Torinus, Jr., and E. L. Van Dellen for Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. et al.; E. P. Porter, Alan C. Furth, Charles W. Burkett, Robert L. Pierce and Thormund A. Miller for Southern Pacific Co. et al., appellees.
   Appeal from D. C. S. D. Cal. Appeal as to appellant Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Co. dismissed pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of this Court.


text:
    March 21, 1966.
    No. 913,
    Misc.
    Kandl v. Urse, Cook County Mental Health Clinic Superintendent, et al.

      Harry R. Booth for petitioner. Edward J. Hladis and Daniel P. Ward for respondents.
   Motion for leave to file petition for writ of habeas corpus and for other relief denied.


text:
    No.-.
    Rosenstiel v. Rosenstiel.

      Peyton Ford for petitioner. Louis Nizer for respondent.
   Motion to defer consideration of No. 934 denied.


text:
    No. 386.
    Garrity et al. v. New Jersey.

      Daniel L. O’Connor for appellants. Norman Heine and James G. Aiken for appellee.
   Appeal from Sup. Ct. N. J. Further consideration of the question of jurisdiction postponed to the hearing of the case on the merits.


text:
    No. 954.
    Watkins v. Conway.

      Emmet J. Bon-durant II for appellant.
   Appeal from Sup. Ct. Ga. Probable jurisdiction noted.


text:
    No. 642.
    Giles et al. v. Maryland.

      Joseph Forer and Hal Witt for petitioners. Thomas B. Finan, Attorney General of Maryland, and Donald Needle, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   Ct. App. Md. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 898.
    Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Errico.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for petitioner. Edwin J. Peterson for respondent.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 1007,
    Misc.
    Scott, aka Plummer v. Immigration and Naturalization Service.

      Edward Q. Carr, Jr., for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall for respondent.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Case transferred to appellate docket and set for oral argument immediately following No. 898.


text:
    No. 826.
    Costello v. United States.

      Ira B. Grudberg for petitioner.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted limited to Question 1 presented by petition which reads as follows:

“1. Do not the federal wagering tax statutes here involved violate the petitioner’s privilege against self-incrimination guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment? Should not this court, especially in view of its recent decision in Albertson v. Subversive Activities Control Board, 382 U. S. 70 (1965), overrule United States v. Kahriger, 345 U. S. 22 (1953) and Lewis v. United States, 348 U. S. 419 (1955)?”


text:
    No. 944.
    Spevack v. Klein.

      Lawrence J. Latto, William H. Dempsey, Jr., and Bernard Shatzkin for petitioner. Solomon A. Klein, respondent, pro se.

   Ct. App. N. Y. Cer-tiorari granted.


text:
    No. 50.
    United States v. S & A Co.

      Solicitor General Cox and Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer for the United States. Leland W. Scott for respondent.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 763.
    No. 937.
    Perfect Fit Products Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. Monsanto Chemical Co., successor to Chemstrand Corp.; and Monsanto Chemical Co., successor to Chemstrand Corp. v. Perfect Fit Products Manufacturing Co., Inc.

      Jay F. Gordon for petitioner in No. 763 and for respondent in No. 937. Granville M. Brumbaugh for petitioner in No. 937 and for respondent in No. 763.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Reported below: 349 F. 2d 389.


text:
    No. 864.
    Tramontana v. Varig Airlines.

      Eugene Gressman and Hyman Smollar for petitioner. Harry A. Bowen and John L. Laskey for respondent.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 894.
    Salter v. United States.

      Frank E. Haddad, Jr., for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Kirby W. Patterson for the United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 918.
    International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO, et al. v. National Labor Relations Board.

      Lester P. Schoene, Milton Kramer and Richard H. Frank for petitioners. Solicitor General Marshall, Arnold Ord-man, Dominick L. Manoli and Norton J. Come for respondent.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 934.
    Wood v. Wood.

      Harris B. Steinberg for petitioner. Simon H. Rif kind for respondent.
   Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 935.
    Forrest Village Apartments, Inc. v. United States.

      Carl L. Shipley for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.
   Ct. Cl. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 938.
    Tennessee Gas Transmission Co. v. United States.

      Vernon M. Turner for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Weisl, Roger P. Marquis, Howard O. Sigmond and Raymond N. Zagone for the United States.
   Ct. Cl. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 945.
    Tremont, aka Larro v. United States.

      James F. Schaeffer for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Mervyn Hamburg for the United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 946.
    Velotta v. McGettrick.

      Don DeRocco for petitioner. John T. Corrigan for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 948.
    Kindelan et ux. v. United States.

      Thomas H. Anderson for petitioners. Solicitor General Marshall, Acting Assistant Attorney General Featherston and Robert N. Anderson for the United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 949.
    Wilson v. United States.

      Harold Gruenberg for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. Maysack for the United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 955.
    Foulkes, Administrator v. United States.

      Lawrence J. Simmons for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.
   Ct. Cl. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 975.
    Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Third National Bank & Trust Co.

      Elmer W. Beasley for petitioner. Ernest J. Gazda for respondent.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 978.
    Ryan, Assignee v. Vickers.

      Milton J. Blake for petitioner. John H. Pickering and M. 0. Shivers, Jr., for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Colo. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 972.
    Bruner et ux. v. Texas.

      Heard L. Floore for petitioners. Wag-goner Carr, Attorney General of Texas, and Hawthorne Phillips, T. B. Wright, Carroll R. Graham, Fred M. Talkington and F. William Colburn, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Tex. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 974.
    Crouch, Probate Judge v. Stanley, Administrator.
   Ct. Civ. App. Tex., 11th Sup. Jud. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 979.
    Ertel Manufacturing Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board.

      Harry P. Dees for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli and Norton J. Come for respondent.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 981.
    Kirschner et al., trading as K-N Enterprises v. West Co.

      Harry R. Kozart for petitioners. Theodore Voorhees for respondent.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 982.
    Perryton Wholesale, Inc. v. Pioneer Distributing Co. of Kansas, Inc.

      Dale M. Stucky for petitioner. Malcolm Miller for respondent.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 998.
    Kiser et al. v. Breaks Interstate Park Commission.

      S. H. Sutherland for petitioners. Robert T. Winston for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. App. Ya. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 986.
    Fried v. Brooklyn Bar Association.
    Petitioner pro se. Benjamin R. Raphael for respondent.
   Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 992.
    Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Ludwig, Guardian, et al.

      Robert A. Straub for petitioner. John von Batchelder for respondents.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1003.
    Locke v. River Lines, Inc.

      Edward R. Kay for petitioner. Or ay-don S. Staring for respondent.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1007.
    Charleston Community Memorial Hospital v. Darling.

      Jack E. Horsley and Fred H. Kelly for petitioner. Stanford S. Meyer for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Ill. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1019.
    Green et al. v. Osgood-Lewis-Perkins, Inc.

      William L. Walker for petitioners. James R. Hoover for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Neb. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 889.
    Riess et ux. v. Murchison et al.
    Mr. Justice Black is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted and the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed.

      Max Frank Deutz for petitioners. John J. Quinn, Jr., for respondents.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 932.
    Goodman et ux. v. Futrovsky et al.
    The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Black are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.

      Leonard S. Goodman, pro se, and for other petitioner. Leroy A. Brill and William S. Potter for respondents Cohen et al.
   Sup. Ct. Del. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1038.
    Grasberger, Trustee in Bankruptcy, et al. v. Calissi, Executrix, et al.

      Peter P. Zion for petitioners.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 947.
    Ten Individual Defendants et al. v. Indian Lake Estates, Inc.

      J. H. Krug and Albert Philipson for petitioners. Ralph E. Becker and F. Murray Callahan for respondent. Arthur J. Hillman, as amicus curiae, in support of the petition.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Motion of Arthur J. Hillman for leave to file a brief, as amicus curiae, granted. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 952.
    Aro Manufacturing Co., Inc., et al. v. Automobile Body Research Corp.

      David Wolf and Charles Hieken for petitioners.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Motion to use record in No. 21, October Term, 1960, and No. 75, October Term, 1963, granted. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 961.
    Bell v. United States.
    Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and petition.

      C. Allen High, Edward B. Henslee, Jr., and Francis H. Monek for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Philip R. Mona-han for the United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Motion to adopt portions of petition in No. 794.granted. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 988.
    Alabama et al. v. Bland.

      Richmond M. Flowers, Attorney General of Alabama, and John C. Tyson III, Assistant Attorney General, for petitioners. Fred S. Ball for respondent.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Motion to dispense with printing respondent’s brief granted. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 977.
    No. 1093,
    Mise.
    E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc. v. Maloney; and Maloney v. E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co.

      William H. Allen for petitioner in No. 977 and for respondent in No. 1093, Mise. Henry Lincoln Johnson, Jr., for petitioner in No. 1093, Mise.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Harlan took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.

Reported below: 122 U. S. App. D. C. 268, 352 P. 2d 936.


text:
    No. 462,
    Misc.
    Woodley v. California.
    Petitioner pro se. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and Norman H. Sokolow, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 717,
    Mise.
    Bailey v. Van Buskirk.

      H. Bruce Baumeister for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Douglas, David L. Rose and Robert V. Zener for respondent.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 724,
    Misc.
    Chambers v. Florida.

      Marco Loffredo and Phillip A. Hubbart for petitioner. Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and James T. Carlisle, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 3d Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 741,
    Misc.
    Carter v. Wisconsin.
    Petitioner pro se. Bronson C. LaFol-lette, Attorney General of Wisconsin, and William A. Platz and Warren H. Resh, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Wis. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 203,
    Misc.
    Di Paolo v. New Jersey.
    Petitioner pro se. Michael B. Imbriani and Raymond R. Trombadore, Deputy Attorneys General of New Jersey, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. N. J. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 742,
    Misc.
    Smith v. City of Toledo.

      Merritt W. Green II for petitioner. John A. DeVictor, Jr., and John J. Burkhart for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 748,
    Misc.
    Elfe v. LaVallee, Warden.
    Petitioner pro se. Louis J. Lejkowitz, Attorney General of New York, and Mortimer Battler, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 782,
    Misc.
    Biloche v. Washington.

      Francis Hoague for petitioner. James E. Kennedy for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Wash. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 791,
    Misc.
    Murray v. United States.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Donald I. Bierman for the United States.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 863,
    Misc.
    Castellano v. United States.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Sidney M. Glazer for the United States.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 916,
    Misc.
    Ansourian v. United States.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 860,
    Misc.
    Caraballo v. LaVallee, Warden.
    Petitioner pro se. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Arthur L. Schiff, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 877,
    Misc.
    Guidry v. Beto, Corrections Director.
    Petitioner pro se. Waggoner Carr, Attorney General of Texas, Hawthorne Phillips, First Assistant Attorney General, T. B. Wright, Executive Assistant Attorney General, and Howard M. Fender and Lonny F. Zwiener, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 917,
    Misc.
    Forsberg v. United States.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Donald I. Bierman for the United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 938,
    Misc.
    Bowman v. United States.

      Vincent Hallinan for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, and Philip R. Monahan for the United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 947,
    Misc.
    Dagampat v. United States.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Theodore George Gilinsky for the United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 963,
    Misc.
    Coleman v. New Jersey.
   Sup. Ct. N. J. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 951,
    Mise.
    Harper v. United States.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. Maysack for the United States.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 974,
    Misc.
    Carey v. Bennett.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall for respondent.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1025,
    Misc.
    Kaufman v. United States.

      Robert O. Hetlage for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. May-sack for the United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1092,
    Misc.
    Perry v. North Carolina.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1102,
    Misc.
    Stevenson v. Mancusi, Warden.
   Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1112,
    Misc.
    Rodriguez v. LaVallee, Warden.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1126,
    No. 1142,
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Taylor v. Ohio; and Jones v. Ohio.
   Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 4 Ohio St. 2d 13, 211 N. E. 2d 198.


text:
    No. 1141,
    Misc.
    Harris v. Wilson, Warden.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1134,
    Misc.
    Evans v. Diner's Club, Inc.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1115,
    Misc.
    Furtak v. New York.
   Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1143,
    Misc.
    Walls v. Myers, Correctional Superintendent.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1144,
    Misc.
    Thomas v. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1147,
    Misc.
    Lester v. Tennessee.
    Petitioner pro se. George F. McCanless, Attorney General of Tennessee, and Edgar P. Calhoun, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Tenn. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1150,
    Misc.
    McGrath v. McMann, Warden.
    Petitioner pro se. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Michael H. Rauch, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1162,
    Misc.
    Aurillo v. Fogliani, Warden.
   Sup. Ct. Nev. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1172,
    Misc.
    Tornetto v. New York.
   Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1176,
    Misc.
    Brown v. Giffin Industries, Inc., et al.
    Petitioner pro se. Samuel J. Powers, Jr., for respondents.
   Sup. Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1156,
    Misc.
    Vess v. Peyton, Penitentiary Superintendent.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1183,
    Misc.
    Shotkin v. Cohen.
   Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 3d Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1185,
    Misc.
    Neal v. California.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1189,
    Misc.
    Bagley v. Rhay, Penitentiary Superintendent, et al.
   Sup. Ct. Wash. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1198,
    Misc.
    Van Slyke v. New York.
   App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 4th Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1199,
    Misc.
    Collins v. Yeager, Prison Keeper.
   Sup. Ct. N. J. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1211,
    Misc.
    Weller v. California.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1212,
    Misc.
    Washington v. Colorado.

      Charles A. Hobbs for petitioner. Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General of Colorado, and John P. Moore, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Colo. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1216,
    Misc.
    Smith v. Illinois.

      John R. Snively for petitioner. William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, Fred Leach, Assistant Attorney General, William R. Nash and Alfred W. Cowan, Jr., for respondent.
   App. Ct. Ill., 2d Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1196,
    Misc.
    Welsher v. Burke, Warden.
   Sup. Ct. Wis. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1217,
    Misc.
    Bell v. Florida.

      Marco Loffredo and Phillip A. Hubbart for petitioner.
   Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 3d Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1219,
    Misc.
    Mercer v. Russell, Correctional Superintendent.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1222,
    Misc.
    Salazar v. Wilson, Warden, et al.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1249,
    Misc.
    Samuels v. Association of the Bar of the City of New York.
   App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 1st Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 828.
    No. 187,
    No. 368,
    No. 843,
    No. 977,
    No. 1018,
    No. 1139,
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Lichota et ux. v. United States, McIlvaine et al. v. Louisiana, Rainsberger v. Nevada, Smith v. Ellington et al., Andrews v. Smith et al., Nielsen v. Nebraska State Bar Association, Wager v. New York,
   382 U. S. 1027;

ante, p. 921;

382 U. S. 455;

382 U. S. 998;

382 U. S. 1029;

ante, p. 105; and

ante, p. 920. Petitions for rehearing denied.


text:
    March 28, 1966.
    No. 79.
    No. 82.
    No. 596.
    Cascade Natural Gas Corp. v. El Paso Natural Gas Co. et al.; California v. El Paso Natural Gas Co. et al.; and Southern California Edison Co. v. El Paso Natural Gas Co. et al.

      Gregory A. Harrison and Atherton Phleger on the motion for appellee El Paso Natural Gas Co. William M. Bennett, H. B. Jones, Jr., Rollin E. Woodbury, Harry W. Sturges, Jr., and William E. Marx on the motion for appellants.
   Appeals from D. C. Utah. (Probable jurisdiction noted, 382 U. S. 970.) Motion of appellee, El Paso Natural Gas Co., to strike portions of the designation of record, and motion of appellants to strike the cross-designation of record, denied without prejudice to the further order of this Court as to costs.


text:
    No. 847.
    No. 877.
    Katzenbach, Attorney General, et al. v. Morgan et ux.; and New York City Board of Elections v. Morgan et ux.

      Raphael Hernandez Colon, Attorney General of Puerto Rico, on the motion.
   Appeals from D. C. D. C. (Probable

jurisdiction noted, 382 U. S. 1007.) Motion of the Attorney General of Puerto Rico for leave to participate in oral argument, as amicus curiae, granted, and 20 minutes are allotted for that purpose. Twenty additional minutes are allotted to counsel for appellees.


text:
    No. 1317,
    No. 1320,
    Mise.
    Mise.
    Postell v. Wilson, Warden; and McLamb v. Wilson, Warden, et al.
   Motions for leave to file petitions for writs of habeas corpus denied.


text:
    No. 1011.
    Wallace et al. v. Virginia.

      George E. Allen, Sr., Anthony G. Amsterdam, Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III, Charles Stephen Ralston, S. W. Tucker and Henry L. Marsh III on the motion.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Motion to advance denied.


text:
    No. 1125.
    Bond et al. v. Floyd et al.

      Leonard B. Boudin and Victor Rabinowitz for appellants on the motion. Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General of Georgia, William L. Harper, Paul L. Hanes and Alfred Evans, Jr., Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees in opposition to the motion.
   Appeal from D. C. N. D. Ga. Motion to advance denied.


text:
    No. 1068.
    Long v. District Court of Iowa, in and for Lee County.
    It is ordered that Ronald L. Carlson, Esquire, of Iowa City, Iowa, be, and he is hereby, appointed to serve as counsel for the petitioner in this case.
   Sup. Ct. Iowa. (Certiorari granted, ante, p. 925.) Motion for appointment of counsel

granted.


text:
    No. 1308,
    Misc.
    Johnson v. Florida.
   Motion for leave to file petition for writ of habeas corpus denied. Treating the papers submitted as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


text:
    No. 875,
    Misc.
    Chapman et al. v. California.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Motion for leave to proceed-m forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of certiorari granted, limited to the following questions:

"Where there is a violation of the rule of Griffin v. California, 380 U. S. 609, (1) can the error be held to be harmless, and (2) if so, was the error harmless in this case?”

Morris Lavine for petitioners. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Doris H. Maier, Assistant Attorney General, and Raymond M. Momboisse, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.

Case transferred to the appellate docket.

The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and petition.


text:
    No. 901.
    Rough Diamond Co., Inc., et al. v. United States.

      Carl L. Shipley for petitioners. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Douglas, Alan S. Rosenthal and Edward Berlin for the United States.
   Ct. Cl. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 922.
    Knetsch et ux. v. United States.

      William Lee McLane, Nola McLane and Thaddeus Rojek for petitioners. Solicitor General Marshall, Acting Assistant Attorney General Roberts, Harry Baum and Philip R. Miller for the United States.
   Ct. Cl. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 989.
    Perati et al. v. United States.
    Petitioners pro se. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Weisl, Roger P. Marquis and Raymond N. Zagone for the United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1005.
    Payson v. United States.

      Penrose Lucas Albright for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.
   Ct. Cl. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 939.
    S. D. Warren Co. v. National Labor Relations Board.

      Robert W. Meserve and John R. Halley for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Arnold, Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, Norton J. Come and Leonard M. Wagman for respondent.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 990.
    Thaggard v. United States.

      Ira De Ment III for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall,. Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Julia P. Cooper for the United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 993.
    No. 994.
    Flick-Reedy Corp. v. Hydro-Line Manufacturing Co.; and Hydro-Line Manufacturing Co. v. Flick-Reedy Corp.

      John Rex Allen, James C. Wood and Lloyd W. Mason for petitioner in No. 993. Martin J. Brown and Malcolm S. Bradway for respondent in No. 993 and for petitioner in No. 994. James C. Wood and Lloyd W. Mason for respondent in No. 994.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Reported below: 351 F. 2d 546.


text:
    No. 1001.
    Kenner v. United States.

      Howard Hilton Spellman for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Kirby W. Patterson for the United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1002.
    Knight & Wall Co. et al. v. Bryant, Governor of Florida, et al.

      Tom Fairfield Brown for petitioners. Earl Pair-cloth, Attorney General of Florida, and Edward D. Cowart and Larry Levy, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondents.
   Sup. Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1006.
    Bailey v. United States.

      Lewis G. Odom, Jr., for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1010.
    Craig v. Florida.

      Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III, Leroy D. Clark, Michael Meltsner, Charles Stephen Ralston, H. W. Dixon, Jay H. Topkis and Anthony G. Amsterdam for petitioner.
   Sup. Ct. Fla. Certio-rari denied.


text:
    Nos. 1012 and 1013.
    Drobnick et al. v. Department of Public Works and Buildings of Illinois.
    Petitioners pro se. William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, and Harold G. Andreios and Donald T. Morrison, Special Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Ill. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1016.
    Signatrol, Inc., et al. v. Schulenburg et al., dba Time-O-Matic Co. et al.

      Horace E. Gunn and Owen Rail for petitioners. Horace A. Young for respondents.
   Sup. Ct. Ill. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1021.
    Yost et al. v. Gunby, Ordinary of Fulton County, et al.

      G. Seals Aiken for petitioners. John Tye Ferguson, Harold Sheats, George P. Dillard, Henry L. Bowden and Jack P. Etheridge for respondents.
   Sup. Ct. Ga. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1104.
    Carden v. Tennessee.

      William Earl Badgett for petitioner. George F. McCanless, Attorney General of Tennessee, and Thomas E. Fox, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Tenn. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1047.
    Goldstein v. Doft.

      Jacob Rassner for petitioner. Samuel B. Seidel for respondent.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1066.
    Albers v. State Board of Equalization, State of California.

      Lemuel D. Sanderson and Hugh T. Fullerton for petitioner. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Ernest P. Goodman, Assistant Attorney General, and John J. Klee, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
   Dist. Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1024.
    Robinson v. Connecticut.
   Sup. Ct. Err. Conn. Motion to dispense with printing petition for writ of certiorari granted. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 858,
    Misc.
    Chavers v. Alabama.
    Petitioner pro se. Richmond M. Flowers, Attorney General of Alabama, and David W. Clark, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Ala. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 872,
    Misc.
    Dowd v. Maxwell, Warden.
    Petitioner pro se. William B. Saxbe, Attorney General of Ohio, and William C. Baird, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 884,
    Misc.
    Collins v. United States.

      Meyer Licht for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1191,
    Misc.
    Hill v. New York.
   Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1182,
    Misc.
    Sanders v. Kansas.
   Sup. Ct. Kan. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 932,
    Misc.
    Cade v. Balkcom, Warden.
    Petitioner pro se. Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General of Georgia, and Carter A. Setliff, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1033,
    Misc.
    Tandler v. United States.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. Maysack for the United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1127,
    Misc.
    Booker et al. v. United States.

      David W. Palmer for petitioners. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Mervyn Hamburg for the United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1195,
    Misc.
    Churchill et al. v. California.
   Dist. Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1201,
    Misc.
    Darst v. Washington State Board of Prison Terms and Paroles et al.
   Sup. Ct. Wash. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1207,
    Misc.
    Gray v. Henderson, Warden.
   C. A.

6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1202,
    Misc.
    Conti v. Patterson.
   Sup. Ct. Colo. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1247,
    Misc.
    Stewart v. Janes.
    Petitioner pro se. William L. Kerr for respondent.
   Ct. Civ. App. Tex., 7th Sup. Jud. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1215,
    Misc.
    Siwecki v. Kaiser Jeep Corp.
    Petitioner pro se. Robert L. Maier for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1236,
    Misc.
    Dixon v. California.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1243,
    Misc.
    Gohlke v. California.
   Dist. Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1248,
    Misc.
    Washington v. Recorder's Court Judge.
   Sup. Ct. Mich. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1259,
    Misc.
    Nafe v. California.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1262,
    Misc.
    White v. Wilson, Warden, et al.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1265,
    Misc.
    Owensby v. United States.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1303,
    Misc.
    Ellis, Administrator v. Stonewall Properties, Inc.
   Sup. Ct. App. Va, Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1221,
    Misc.
    Thomas v. Pate, Warden.

      Thomas B. McNeill for petitioner.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Petition for writ of certiorari is denied as untimely.


text:
    No. 1343,
    Misc.
    De Lago v. New York.
   Ct. App.

N. Y. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 30.
    No. 31.
    No. 255,
    No. 924,
    No. 1019,
    No. 1042,
    No. 1054,
    No. 1083,
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Idaho Sheet Metal Works, Inc. v. Wirtz, Secretary of Labor, Wirtz, Secretary of Labor v. Steepleton General Tire Co., Inc., et al., Williams v. Tennessee, Machado v. Wilkins, Warden, Rhodes v. Jones, Stiltner v. Washington, Darrah v. Illinois, Stevens v. Ohio,
   ante, p. 190;

ante, p. 190;

382 U. S. 961;

ante, p.916;

ante, p. 919;

ante, p. 919;

ante, p. 919; and

ante, p. 939. Petitions for rehearing denied.


text:
    No. 843.
    Ginsburg v. Ginsburg et al.,
   ante, p. 907. Petition for rehearing and motion to remand denied.


text:
    No. 1132,
    Misc.
    In re Disbarment of Santana,
   ante, p. -939. Petition for rehearing and for other relief denied.


text:
    April 1, 1966.
    No. —.
    Thomson et al. v. California.
    Applicants pro se. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, and J. F. Coakley in opposition.
   Berkeley-

Albany Municipal Court, County of Alameda.

Application for a stay presented to Mr. Justice Douglas, and by him referred to the Court, denied.


text:
    April 4, 1966.
    No. 594.
    Gojack v. United States.

      Melvin L. Wulf on- the motion.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. (Certiorari granted, 382 U. S. 937.) Motion of petitioner to remove this case from summary calendar is denied.


text:
    No. 847. No. 877.
    Katzenbach, Attorney General, et al. v. Morgan et ux.; and New York City Board of Elections v. Morgan et ux.

      Louis J. Lejkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Ruth Kessler Toch, Acting Solicitor General, and dean M. Coon, Assistant Attorney General, on the motion.
   Appeals from D. C. D. C. (Probable

jurisdiction noted, 382 U. S. 1007.) Motion of the Attorney General of New York for leave to participate in oral argument, as amicus curiae, granted, and thirty minutes are allotted for that purpose. Thirty additional minutes are allotted to counsel for appellants.

[For earlier orders in these cases, see also ante, pp. 903, 955.]


text:
    No. 1309,
    No. 1314,
    No. 1337,
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Schack v. Florida et al.; Allen v. Wilson, Warden, et al.; and Johnson v. California Adult Authority.
   Motions for leave to file petitions for writs of habeas corpus denied.


text:
    No. 159.
    No. 576.
    Chicago & North Western Railway Co. et al. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. et al.; and United States et al. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. et al.
   Appeals from D. C. S. D. Cal. Probable jurisdiction noted. The cases are consolidated and a total of three hours is allotted for oral argument.

Nuel D. Belnap, Richard M. Freeman, Bryce L. Hamilton, Raymond K. Merrill, Nye F. More-house, John W. Adams, Martin L. Cassell arid Frank R. Johnston for appellants in No. 159. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert B. Hummel, Jerry Z. Pruzansky, Robert W. Ginnane and Arthur J. Cerra for the United States et al. in No. 576. Douglas F. Smith, Howard J. Trienens, George L. Saunders, Jr., John E. McCullough, S. R. Brittingham, Jr., Monroe E. Clinton, Frank S. Farrell, Lawrence W. Hobbs, L. E. Torinus, Jr., and E. L. Van Dellen for Atchi-son, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. et al., and E. P. Porter, Alan C. Furth, Charles W. Burkett, Robert L. Pierce and Thormund A. Miller for Southern Pacific Co. et al., appellees in both cases. Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General of Oregon, Lloyd G. Hammel and Richard W. Sabin, Assistant Attorneys General, John J. O’Connell, Attorney General of Washington, and Frank P. Hayes, Assistant Attorney General, for Regulatory Commissions of the State of Arizona et al., and Mary Moran Pajalich and J. Thomason Phelps for the State of California et al., intervening plaintiffs-appellees in both cases.

Reported below: 238 F. Supp. 528.


text:
    No. 406,
    Misc.
    Miller v. Rhay, Penitentiary Superintendent.
    Petitioner pro se. John J. O’Connell, Attorney General of Washington, and Stephen C. Way, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   Sup Ct. Wash. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certio-rari granted. Case transferred to appellate docket.


text:
    No. 850.
    Cichos v. Indiana.

      John P. Price and Cleon H. Foust for petitioner. John J. Dillon, Attorney General of Indiana, and Charles S. White for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Ind. Cer-tiorari granted.


text:
    No. 1039.
    United States v. Demko.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Douglas, Morton Hollander and Richard S. Salzman for the United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 493,
    Misc.
    Anders v. California.
    Petitioner pro se. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and George J. Roth, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Case transferred to appellate docket.


text:
    No. 347.
    In re Foster.

      Edward S. Irons, Stanley M. Clark and Mary Helen Sears for petitioner. Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Assistant Attorney General Douglas and Sherman L. Cohn for the Commissioner of Patents in opposition.
   C. C. P. A. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 971.
    Burde et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

      Albert A. Wedeen for petitioners. Solicitor General Marshall, Acting Assistant Attorney General Roberts and Melva M. Graney for respondent.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1014.
    Lusk et al. v. United States.

      Isidore H. Wachtel for petitioners. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Douglas and Alan S. Rosenthal for the United States.
   Ct. Cl. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1015.
    R. C. Owen Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

      William Waller for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Acting Assistant Attorney General Roberts and I.,Henry Kutz for respondent.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1017.
    Irwin v. United States.

      Joseph M. Cohen and Louis W. Book-heim, Jr., for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Sidney M. Glazer for the United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1018.
    Hobbs v. Lane, Warden.

      Robert C. Probst for petitioner.
   Sup. Ct. Ind. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1020.
    W. W. I. Z., Inc., et al. v. Federal Communications Commission et al.

      Carl L. Shipley for petitioners. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Milton J. Grossman, Henry Getter, John H. Conlin and Lenore G. Ehrig for respondent Federal Communications Commission.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1037.
    Fleming v. Illinois.
   Sup. Ct. Ill. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1023.
    Blanchard Importing & Distributing Co., Inc. v. Charles Gilman & Son, Inc., et al.

      Harold E. Cole for petitioner.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1025.
    Royal Court Apartments, Inc. v. United States.

      Carl L. Shipley for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.
   Ct. Cl. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1027.
    Alabama Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Securities and Exchange Commission et al.

      Bennett Boskey, Joseph Volpe, Jr., and J. M. Williams, Jr., for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Philip A. Loomis, Jr., David Ferber, Ellwood L. Englander and Richard E. Nathan for the Securities and Exchange Commission, and John Bingham and Ezekiel G. Stoddard for Alabama Power Co. et al., respondents.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1031.
    Bakes v. United States.

      Joseph I. Bulger for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Acting Assistant Attorney General Roberts, Joseph M. Howard and John M. Brant for the United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1033.
    Heinze, Warden v. Cunningham.

      Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, and Doris H. Maier, Assistant Attorney General, for petitioner.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1042.
    Carr v. United States.

      Henry R. Carr for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.
   Ct. Cl. Certio-rari denied.


text:
    No. 1022.
    Tabas v. Hudson.

      Tobias Simon for petitioner.
   Sup. Ct. Fla. Certio-rari denied.


text:
    No. 1036.
    Brooks v. United States.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Mervyn Hamburg for the United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1041.
    Penn et al. v. New York.

      Robert Kasanof and Carl Rachlin for petitioners. Frank S. Hogan, H. Richard Uviller, Michael Juviler and Alan F. Liebowitz for respondent.
   Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1043.
    Goldman v. Virginia.

      Jacob Kossman and Calvin W. Breit for petitioner.
   Sup. Ct. App. Va. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1044.
    Jiggs, Inc., et al. v. Slumbertogs, Inc., et al.

      Maximilian Bader and I. Walton Bader for petitioners. Milton Mound for respondents.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1048.
    Cottage v. United States.

      George S. Fitzgerald and Paul B. Mayrand for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Mervyn Hamburg for the United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1051.
    Dorchester Gas Producing Co. v. Federal Power Commission.

      Bernard A. Foster, Jr., and Donald B. Robertson for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Richard A. Solomon, Howard E. Wahrenbrock and Leo E. For-quer for respondent.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1052.
    Logan v. Empresa Lineas Maritimas Argentinas et al.

      Lawrence F. O’Donnell for petitioner. Seymour P. Edgerton for Empresa Lineas Maritimas Argentinas and Thomas D. Bums for Jarka Corp. of New England, respondents.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1070.
    Jervis Corp. v. Nelmor Corp.

      Clarence B. Zewadski for petitioner. Max R. Kraus for respondent.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1084.
    Mozingo v. York County Natural Gas Authority.

      Henry Hammer and James P. Mozingo III, pro se, for petitioner. C. W. F. Spencer, Jr., and Huger Sinkler for respondent.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 479,
    Misc.
    Davenport v. Kentucky.
    Petitioner pro se. Robert Matthews, Attorney General of Kentucky, and George F. Rabe, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   Ct. App. Ky. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 543,
    Misc.
    Farrell v. Burke, Warden.
    Petitioner pro se. Bronson C. La Follette, Attorney General of Wisconsin, and William A. Platz and Warren H. Resh, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 793,
    Misc.
    Logan v. New York.
    Petitioner pro se. Isidore Dollinger and Walter E. Dillon for respondent.
   Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 975,
    Misc.
    Wallis v. Pennsylvania.
   Ct. of Quarter Sessions of Northampton County, Pa. Certio-rari denied.


text:
    No. 836,
    Misc.
    Gallegos et al. v. Colorado.

      H. D. Reed for petitioners. Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General of Colorado, and James W. Creamer, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Colo. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 999,
    Misc.
    Hardin v. Florida.
    Petitioner pro se. Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and T. T. Turnbull, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1045,
    Misc.
    Conway v. California Adult Authority.
    Petitioner pro se. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, and Robert R. Granucci and Michael R. Marrón, Deputy Attorneys General, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1190,
    Misc.
    Simpson v. United States.
    Petitioner pro se. Acting Solicitor General Spritzer for the United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1232,
    Misc.
    Harris v. Illinois.
   Sup. Ct. Ill. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1252,
    Misc.
    Rhodes v. Houston et al.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1256,
    Misc.
    Khabiri v. Virginia Electric & Power Co. et al.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1274,
    Misc.
    Gatling v. New York.
   App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 2d Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1275,
    Misc.
    Humphrey v. California.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 142,
    Misc.
    McGruder v. Massachusetts.
    Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted. Petitioner pro se.

      Matthew J. Ryan, Jr., for respondent.
   Sup. Jud. Ct. Mass. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 370,
    Misc.
    Spica v. Missouri.
    Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.

      Robert W. Yost for petitioner. Norman H. Anderson, Attorney General of Missouri, and James J. Murphy, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Mo. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 504,
    Misc.
    Jupiter v. California Legislature et al.
    Petitioner pro se. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, and Edsel W. Haws and Anthony S. Da Vigo, Deputy Attorneys General, for respondents.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 490,
    Misc.
    Bryant v. Wilkins, Warden.
    Petitioner pro se. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, and Anthony J. Lokot, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied on representation of Attorney General of New York that there is an adequate state remedy available to petitioner.


text:
    No. 594,
    Misc.
    Pert v. Wainwright, Corrections Director.
    Petitioner pro se. Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and George R. GeorgiejJ, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Ela. Certiorari denied on representation of Attorney General of Florida that there is an adequate state remedy available to petitioner.


text:
    No. 1240,
    Misc.
    Black v. United States.
    Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1280,
    Misc.
    Leyde v. Rhay, Penitentiary Superintendent.
   Sup. Ct. Wash. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 709,
    No. 887,
    October Term, 1963.
    Misc.
    Gorsuch et al. v. Landoe, Gorsuch et al. v. De Pinto et al.; and Hackett v. United States,
   376 U. S. 950, sub nom.

382 U. S. 1029. Motions for leave to file petitions for rehearing denied.


text:
    No. 837.
    No. 862.
    No. 926.
    No. 525,
    No. 1133,
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Bowling v. United States, Knoll et al. v. Knoll et al., Salemi v. Duffy Construction Corp., Wright v. United States, Oppenheimer v. California,
   ante, p. 908;

ante, p. 909;

ante, p. 927;

382 U. S. 1015; and

ante, p. 930. Petitions for rehearing denied.


author: Mr. Justice Black Mr. Justice Harlan.

text:
    BROOKHART v. JANIS, DIRECTOR OF THE OHIO DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HYGIENE AND CORRECTION.
    No. 657.
    Argued March 21-22, 1966.
    Decided April 18, 1966.

      Gerald A. Messerman, by appointment of the Court, 382 U. S. 899, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Lawrence Herman, also by appointment of the Court.

      Leo J. Conway, Assistant Attorney General of Ohio, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was William B. Saxbe, Attorney General.
   Mr. Justice Black

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The petitioner, James Brookhart, while serving the first of three consecutive sentences of from one to 20 years imposed by an Ohio Court of Common Pleas upon convictions of forgery and uttering forged instruments, brought this action for habeas corpus in the Supreme Court of Ohio. There is no question raised about that court’s jurisdiction. Petitioner charged and contends here that all his convictions are constitutionally invalid because obtained in a trial that denied him his federally guaranteed constitutional right to confront the witnesses against him (a) by permitting the State to introduce against him an out-of-court alleged confession of a co-defendant, Mitchell, and (b) by denying him the right to cross-examine any of the State’s witnesses who testified against him. Master Commissioners appointed by the State Supreme Court recommended that habeas corpus be denied. They found that “petitioner although he did not plead guilty agreed that all the state had to prove was a prima facie case, that he would not contest it and that there would be no cross-examination of witnesses.” This finding was not based on oral testimony but was based exclusively on an examination of the transcript of the proceedings in the trial court in which petitioner was convicted. The State Supreme Court accepted its Commissioners’ view of waiver, stating that the transcript of the trial showed that:

“In open court, while represented by counsel, petitioner agreed that, although he would not plead guilty, he would not contest the state’s case or cross-examine its witnesses but would require only that the state prove each of the essential elements of the crime.” 2 Ohio St. 2d 36, 40, 205 N. E. 2d 911, 914.

Upon this basis the State Supreme Court rejected petitioner’s constitutional contentions and ordered him remanded to custody. 2 Ohio St. 2d 36, 205 N. E. 2d 911. We granted certiorari to determine whether Ohio denied petitioner’s constitutional right to be confronted with and to cross-examine the witnesses against him. 382 U. S. 810.

In this Court respondent admits that:

“[I]f there was here a denial of cross-examination without waiver, it would be constitutional error of the first magnitude and no amount of showing of want of prejudice would cure it.”

This concession is properly made. The Sixth Amendment provides that: “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right ... to be confronted with the witnesses against him . . . .” And in Pointer v. Texas, 380 U. S. 400, 406, we held that the confrontation guarantee of the Sixth Amendment including the right of cross-examination “is ‘to be enforced against the States under the Fourteenth Amendment according to the same standards that protect those personal rights against federal encroachment.’ Malloy v. Hogan, supra, 378 U. S., at 10.” See also Douglas v. Alabama, 380 U. S. 415. It follows that unless petitioner did actually waive his right to be confronted with and to cross-examine these witnesses, his federally guaranteed constitutional rights have been denied in two ways. In the first place he was denied the right to cross-examine at all any witnesses who testified against him. In the second place there was introduced as evidence against him an alleged confession, made out of court by one of his co-defendants, Mitchell, who did not testify in court, and petitioner was therefore denied any opportunity whatever to confront and cross-examine the witness who made this very damaging statement. We therefore pass on to the question of waiver.

The question of a waiver of a federally guaranteed constitutional right is, of course, a federal question controlled by federal law. There is a presumption against the waiver of constitutional rights, see, e. g., Glasser v. United States, 315 U. S. 60, 70-71, and for a waiver to be effective it must be clearly established that there was “an intentional relinquishment or abandonment of a known right or privilege.” Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U. S. 458, 464.

In deciding the federal question of waiver raised here we must, of course, look to the facts which allegedly support the waiver. Upon an examination of the facts shown in this record, we are completely unable to agree with the Supreme Court of Ohio that the petitioner intelligently and knowingly waived his right to cross-examine the witnesses whose testimony was used to convict him. The trial record shows the following facts: Petitioner was arraigned January 29, 1962, without a lawyer, and pleaded not guilty to all charges against him. Two days later the court appointed counsel to represent him. Not able to make bond, he remained in jail until March 23, 1962, at which time he was brought before the judge for trial. There petitioner’s appointed counsel told the judge that his client had signed waivers of trial by jury and wanted to be tried by the court. The judge in order to verify the waivers showed petitioner the two written waivers of trial by jury bearing his signature and asked him if the signature was his. Petitioner said it was. The following colloquy among the judge, petitioner, and his counsel then took place in open court:

“Mr. Ergazos [petitioner’s lawyer]: That[’]s correct, Your Honor.
“The Court: Anything further?
“Mr. Kandel: Nothing further.
“Mr. Ergazos: The only thing is, Your Honor, this matter is before the court on a prima facie case.
“The Court: There being no . . . going to be no cross-examination of the witnesses, so the court will know and the State can’t be taken by surprise, the court doesn’t want to be fooled and have your client change his mind half way through the trial and really contest it, the State has a contest, we want to know in fairness to them so they can put on complete proof.
“Mr. Ergazos: I might say this, Your Honor, if there is any testimony adduced here this morning which leaves any question as to this defendant in connection with this crime I would like to reserve the right to cross-examine at that time.
“The Court: That is raising another . . . that is putting the State on the spot and the court on the spot, I won’t find him guilty if the evidence is substantial.
“Mr. Ergazos: We have a jury question in the court, undoubtedly there will be . . .
“The Court : Ordinarily in a prima facie case . . . the prima facie case is where the defendant, not technically or legally, in effect admits his guilt and wants the State to prove it.
“Mr. Ergazos: That is correct.
“The Court: And the court knowing that and the Prosecutor knowing that, instead of having a half a dozen witness on one point they only have one because they understand there will be no contest.
“A [Brookhart] I would like to point out in no way am I pleading guilty to this charge.
“The Court: If you want to stand trial we will give you a jury trial.
“A I have been incarcerated now for the last eighteen months in the county jail.
“The Court: You don’t get credit for that.
“A For over two months my nerves have been . . . I couldn’t stand it out there any longer, I would like to be tried by this court.
“The Court: Make up your mind whether you require a prima facie case or a complete trial of it.
“Mr. Ergazos: Prima facie, Your Honor, is all we are interested in.
“The Court: All right.” (Emphasis supplied.)

From the foregoing it seems clear that petitioner’s counsel agreed to a prima facie trial. By agreeing to this truncated kind of trial — if trial it could be called— we can assume that the lawyer knowingly agreed that the State need make only a prima facie showing of guilt and that he would neither offer evidence on petitioner’s behalf nor cross-examine any of the State’s witnesses. The record shows, however, that petitioner himself did not intelligently and knowingly agree to be tried in a proceeding which was the equivalent of a guilty plea and in which he would not have the right to be confronted with and cross-examine the witnesses against him. His desire not to agree to such a trial is shown by the fact that immediately after the judge accurately stated that in a prima facie case the defendant “in effect admits his guilt,” Brookhart personally interjected his statement that “I would like to point out in no way am I pleading guilty to this charge.” Although he expressly waived his right to a jury trial, he never, at any time, either explicitly or implicitly, pleaded guilty. His emphatic statement to the judge that “in no way am I pleading guilty” negatives any purpose on his part to agree to have his case tried on the basis of the State’s proving a prima facie case which both the trial court and the State Supreme Court held was the practical equivalent of a plea of guilty. Our question therefore narrows down to whether counsel has power to enter a plea which is inconsistent with his client’s expressed desire and thereby waive his client’s constitutional right to plead not guilty and have a trial in which he can confront and cross-examine the witnesses against him. We hold that the constitutional rights of a defendant cannot be waived by his counsel under such circumstances. It is true, as stated in Henry v. Mississippi, 379 U. S. 443, 451, that counsel may, under some conditions, where the circumstances are not “exceptional, preclude the accused from asserting constitutional claims . . . .” Nothing in Henry, however, can possibly support a contention that counsel for defendant can override his client’s desire expressed in open court to plead not guilty and enter in the name of his client another plea — whatever the label — which would shut off the defendant’s constitutional right - to confront and cross-examine the witnesses against him which he would have an opportunity to do under a plea of not guilty. Since we hold that petitioner neither personally waived his right nor acquiesced in his lawyer’s attempted waiver, the judgment of the Supreme Court of Ohio must be and is reversed and the case is remanded to that court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

It is so ordered.

Separate opinion of

Mr. Justice Harlan.

I do not find the issue in this case as straightforward as does the Court. If the record were susceptible only of the reading given it by the Court, I would concur in the judgment. However, for me this case presents problems of two sorts.

First, the precise nature of the “rights” that were allegedly “waived” is not wholly clear. One view, adopted by the Court, is that petitioner’s lawyer in effect entered a conditional plea of guilty for the defendant. Another interpretation, which is certainly arguable, would find the agreement between petitioner’s counsel and the trial court to involve no more than a matter of trial procedure. I believe a lawyer may properly make a tactical determination of how to run a trial even in the face of his client’s incomprehension or even explicit disapproval. The decision, for example, whether or not to cross-examine a specific witness is, I think, very clearly one for counsel alone. Although it can be contended that the waiver here was nothing more than a tactical choice of this nature, I believe for federal constitutional purposes the procedure agreed to in this instance involved so significant a surrender of the rights normally incident to a trial that it amounted almost to a plea of guilty or nolo con-tendere. And I do not believe that under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment such a plea may be entered by counsel over his client’s protest.

Second, given the need for petitioner’s approval of the entry of such a plea, the further question arises whether petitioner did in fact agree to be tried in a “prima facie” trial without the opportunity to cross-examine witnesses. The Supreme Court of Ohio, on the basis of an examination of the record, found that petitioner “agreed that all the state had to prove was a prima facie case, that he would not contest it, and that there would be no cross-examination of witnesses.” Brookhart v. Haskins, 2 Ohio St. 2d 36, 38, 205 N. E. 2d 911, 913. This Court, after an independent examination of the relevant portion of the same record, reprinted, ante, pp. 5-6, finds that petitioner “did not intelligently and knowingly agree to be tried in a proceeding which was the equivalent of a guilty plea . . . .” Ante, p. 7.

The decisive fact is of course the state of petitioner’s mind — his understanding and his intention — when his counsel stated to the trial court: “Prima facie, Your Honor, is all we are interested in.” My reading of the record leaves me in substantial doubt as to what petitioner’s actual understanding was at the end of the pertinent courtroom colloquy, a doubt that is enhanced by the general unfamiliarity that seems to exist with this Ohio “prima facie” practice. I cannot see how the question can be satisfactorily resolved solely on the existing record. I would therefore vacate this judgment and remand the case for a hearing under appropriate state procedures to determine whether petitioner did in fact knowingly and freely choose to have his guilt determined in this type of trial. Failing the availability of such proceedings in the state courts, the avenue of federal habeas corpus would then be open to petitioner for determination of that issue.

       Petitioner was also convicted in the same trial of breaking and entering and grand larceny. His sentences on these convictions were made to run concurrently with his sentences for forgery and uttering forged instruments.

       Mitchell pleaded guilty after being indicted with petitioner, was sentenced to an Ohio state reformatory, and although in the reformatory at the time of petitioner’s trial, was not called to testify in person.

       The petition also charged that Brookhart had not been given adequate notice of the charges upon which he was tried because the indictment charging him with forgery and uttering forged instruments was amended at trial. And in this Court petitioner attacks his convictions on several other constitutional grounds. We find it unnecessary to decide any of the additional contentions set out in this note.

       When constitutional rights turn on the resolution of a factual dispute we are duty bound to make an independent examination of the evidence in the record. See, e. g., Edwards v. South Carolina, 372 U. S. 229, 235; Blackburn v. Alabama, 361 U. S. 199, 205, n. 5.

       Compare Rideau v. Louisiana, 373 U. S. 723, 726.

      The Supreme Court of Ohio characterized the procedure as “unusual,” 2 Ohio St. 2d, at 39, 205 N. E. 2d, at 914. At oral argument, the Assistant Attorney General of Ohio noted that he had been unaware of such a procedure, and that the practice could not be found in any statute or rules of court. The State explains the procedure as follows: “There is no statutory plea of nolo contendere in Ohio in felony cases, therefore, when one is charged with a crime »which he knows that he cannot successfully defend, but a plea of guilty will subject him to a penalty in a civil suit arising out of the same factual situation, he is without recourse to a plea of nolo contendere as is permitted in federal courts and certain other state courts. To circumvent this difficulty some Ohio courts have allowed, as was done here, the accused to enter a plea of not guilty and by arrangement require the prosecution to prove only a prima facie case.” Brief, at 44-45, note 41.