author: Per Curiam. Mr. Justice Fortas, Mr. Justice White,

text:
    MASSACHUSETTS v. PAINTEN.
    No. 37.
    Argued October 18, 1967.
    Decided January 15, 1968.

      Elliot L. Richardson, Attorney General of Massachusetts, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Willie J. Davis and James B. Krasnoo, Assistant Attorneys General.

      Louis M. Nordlinger argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.

      Anthony O. Amsterdam and Melvin L. Wulf filed a brief for the American Civil Liberties Union et ah, as amici curiae, urging affirmance.
   Per Curiam.

In 1958 respondent was tried and convicted in Middle-sex Superior Court, Massachusetts, for armed robbery of a bank and related offenses. He appealed, and in 1961 his conviction was affirmed by the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, sub nom. Commonwealth v. Binkiewicz, 342 Mass. 740, 175 N. E. 2d 473.

Respondent eventually filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the Federal District Court. Testimony was taken by the District Court on December 30, 1965. It ruled that respondent’s Fourth Amendment rights had been violated by the entry into his apartment, by his arrest, and by the search and seizure of certain articles in his apartment which were introduced in evidence against him. Accordingly, it set aside his conviction and ordered his release. Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U. S. 643 (1961). The Court of Appeals affirmed. We granted certiorari because of the importance of the constitutional issues presented.

At the time of respondent’s trial in 1958, Massachusetts did not have an exclusionary rule for evidence obtained by an illegal search or seizure, Commonwealth v. Wilkins, 243 Mass. 356, 138 N. E. 11 (1923); Commonwealth v. Spofford, 343 Mass. 703, 706, 180 N. E. 2d 673, 675 (1962), and the parties did not focus upon the issues now before us. The evidentiary hearing in 1965 took place almost eight years after the events.

After oral argument and study of the record, we have reached the conclusion that the record is not sufficiently clear and specific to permit decision of the important constitutional questions involved in this case. The writ is therefore dismissed as improvidently granted. Cf. Smith v. Mississippi, 373 U. S. 238 (1963).

Dismissed.

Mr. Justice Fortas,

concurring.

The dissent written by my Brother White, with whom my Brothers Harlan and Stewart join, impels me to add this note. I agree with the Court’s action in dismissing the writ of certiorari for having been improvidently granted because the record is not adequate for disposition of the case in terms of its constitutional problems. Mr. Justice White’s opinion is not in disagreement on this point. He would remand the case for a purpose which seems to me to be unreal: that is, to hold an inquiry, almost 10 years after the event, as to “whether Officer Rufo could have believed that the bag had been abandoned and whether the bag was searched before or after guns were observed.” This inquiry — at this late date — is as elusive as an attempt to capture last night’s moonbeam.

As some of my colleagues have often said, we do not sit as a court of criminal appeals to review judgments of state courts. The question in the instant case comes here as a result of federal habeas corpus proceedings. We should consider it if, and only if, we should and can dispose of it on its record in terms of constitutional principle. The Court’s disposition of this case is based upon the sound premise that we should not use our certiorari jurisdiction to express our views on a point in a case which we cannot dispose of because of inadequacies of the record which cannot realistically be remedied.

1 should not ordinarily feel it necessary to file a comment in this vein. In the present situation, I am troubled lest my Brother White’s dissent should give the impression that only he and my Brothers Harlan and Stewart believe that the court below erred in relying on its inferences as to the undisclosed intent of the officers. I agree with the Court’s disposition of this case, not because I disagree with the position stated in the dissent on this issue, but because oral argument and detailed consideration of the case after certiorari was granted disclosed the infirmity of the record which precludes the orderly disposition of the case by this Court.

Mr. Justice White,

with whom Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Stewart join,

dissenting.

The Court granted certiorari because the rule of law applied by the Court of Appeals to the facts found by both it and the District Court raised troubling and difficult questions about the restrictions imposed by the Fourth Amendment on evidence that may be admitted at a criminal trial. The Court now says, quite rightly, that the record in this case is stale and the facts unclear. We have, however, a set of facts found by a United States District Court and approved by a Court of Appeals. Determining what legal consequences should follow from those facts is difficult, but is the task normally entrusted to this Court. I would accept the facts found by two federal courts and decide the questions of law presented to us.

The relevant facts found below are as follows. Two police officers, having a suspicion that respondent had committed felonies but not having probable cause to believe that he had committed them, went to the door of respondent’s apartment. Their motive, the courts below found, was to arrest and search, whether or not their investigation provided the probable cause that would make an arrest and search constitutional. This plan was not communicated to respondent, who when he came to the door was led to believe the officers wished only to speak to him. Told no more than that the officers wished to ask questions, respondent asked them to wait a minute, closed the door, tossed a paper bag onto a fire escape, returned, and let the officers enter. The officers did nothing to respondent but ask questions; while doing that another officer, posted below, who had seen the bag drop, walked through the apartment and out onto the fire escape, where he found guns and bullets in the bag. The officers arrested respondent, and undertook a complete search of the apartment incident to the arrest.

On these facts the District Court concluded that “[s]ince the officers had no probable cause to arrest when they entered the apartment they cannot retroactively validate the entry or arrest by reliance on what they discovered as a result of the illegal entry.” 252 F. Supp., at 857. The Court of Appeals agreed, saying that the officers “set out to arrest and search [respondent] in the hope that evidence would develop,” and that “since their actions were improper, the police were not entitled to the fruits.” 368 F. 2d, at 144. The question is thus whether the fact that the officers were not truthful in telling respondent their intentions required that the evidence found by the policemen after they entered the apartment be barred from admission at respondent’s trial as a “fruit” of unlawful police conduct.

The position of the courts below must rest on a view that a policeman’s intention to offend the Constitution if he can achieve his goal in no other way contaminates all of his later behavior. In the case before us the syllogism must be that although the policeman’s words requested entry for the purpose of asking respondent questions, and the policeman- — on being allowed to enter — did nothing to respondent but ask questions, the “fruits” of the policeman’s otherwise lawful request to enter and question — the bag tossed out of the window and into a place where it could be seen from the street— should not be usable by the State. This is because the policeman was willing, had his lawful conduct not developed probable cause justifying respondent’s arrest, to search respondent’s apartment unlawfully in the hope of finding evidence of a crime.

That such a rule makes no sense is apparent when one sees it in the context of an abstruse application of the exclusionary rule, imposed on the States as the only available way to encourage compliance by state police officers with the commands of the Fourth Amendment. See Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U. S. 643, 652-653 (1961). Because we wish to deter policemen from searching without a warrant, we would bar admission of evidence Officer McNamara discovered by ransacking respondent’s apartment without a warrant or a basis for warrantless search. The expanded exclusionary rule applied in the opinions below would be defensible only if we felt it important to deter policemen from acting lawfully but with the plan — the attitude of mind — of going further and acting unlawfully if the lawful conduct produces insufficient results. We might wish that policemen would not act with impure plots in mind, but I do not believe that wish a sufficient basis for excluding, in the supposed service of the Fourth Amendment, probative evidence obtained by actions — if not thoughts — entirely in accord with the Fourth Amendment and all other constitutional requirements. In addition, sending state and federal courts on an expedition into the minds of police officers would produce a grave and fruitless misallocation of judicial resources. I voted to grant certiorari in this case in the hope the Court would state that the Court of Appeals erred in its view that a policeman’s unlawful subjective intentions require exclusion of evidence obtained by lawful conduct, and I would not dismiss while the opportunity of so stating remains.

A second ground that could support a view that the officers’ entry was unlawful is the position that the policemen’s untruths — their failure to tell respondent of their plan — “vitiated” his consent to their entry. I might not agree with, but I could understand, a position that police officers acting without a warrant can obtain lawful consent to enter a home and ask questions only by explaining to the occupants that they have a constitutional right to deny admission, even to officers of the law conducting an authorized and necessary investigation. But I cannot understand a view that consent is permissible if given in response to a mere request to enter uttered by a policeman wishing only to ask questions but not if given to a policeman who says he wishes to question but in fact intends to do more. If the policeman does more we will bar admission of the fruits of his illegal action. But if he does only so much as he has told the occupant he will do, and so less than he was willing to do, the occupant’s consent was to the conduct which occurred; in that case there is no reason to exclude what the policeman learns from doing what the occupant consented to his doing.

There remains a possibility that respondent’s confinement may offend the Constitution. When the officers entered respondent’s apartment, they had permission to ask questions but no permission to search. Had they looked in closets or drawers, or even in a closed paper bag lying in view, they would have been acting in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The paper bag containing the guns was on a fire escape attached to an apartment other than respondent’s, but that alone did not give the officers permission to seize it. The Fourth Amendment’s protection extends to “effects” as well as to “persons, houses, papers.” Of course “abandoned” property may be seized, Abel v. United States, 362 U. S. 217, 241 (1960), but neither court below inquired whether Officer Rufo reasonably believed this bag had been abandoned or instead should reasonably have thought respondent had set it on the fire escape temporarily without wishing to abandon it, cf. Rios v. United States, 364 U. S. 253, 262, n. 6 (1960). If the bag was not abandoned, another question of fact is relevant: whether Officer Rufo saw that the bag contained guns before he opened it, or opened the bag and then saw the guns. Since neither the District Court nor the Court of Appeals reached these issues, I would vacate the judgment of the Court of Appeals and remand the case to the District Court to determine whether Officer Rufo could have believed that the bag had been abandoned and whether the bag was searched before or after guns were observed.

       252 F. Supp. 851 (D. C. Mass. 1966).

       368 F. 2d 142 (C. A. 1st Cir. 1966).

       386 U. S. 931 (1967).

       386 U. S. 931 (1967).

       368 F. 2d 142 (C. A. 1st Cir. 1966).

       252 F. Supp. 851 (D. C. Mass. 1966).

       One officer “stuck his hand into” the pocket of respondent’s companion, one Ash, and “found about $200.00 in ten and twenty dollar bills stuffed in the pocket.” 252 F. Supp., at 856. The bills were apparently not introduced at respondent’s trial, but the officers’ conduct in searching Ash without justification may well have influenced the courts below on the question of the officers’ intentions.

       Mr. Justice Fortas, although he does not disagree with the view that the Court of Appeals erred in issuing the writ of habeas corpus for the reasons which it gave, would nevertheless dismiss the writ of certiorari because the record is stale and inadequate with respect to the issue of abandonment. But if it was error to issue the writ of habeas corpus on the grounds relied on by the Court of Appeals — and there is no infirmity in the record with respect to this question — then the judgment should be reversed unless there is some other basis for the issuance of habeas corpus at the behest of this state prisoner. If the record is unclear with respect to this possible additional ground — here the search of the bag and the seizure of the guns — and it is thought undesirable to have the record reopened and the question clarified, the case should simply be reversed, not dismissed so that the erroneous judgment remains in effect. Habeas corpus should not issue and Painten should not be released unless the record clearly justifies such a judgment.


source: Caselaw Access Project

author: Per Curiam.

license: Public Domain

text:
    CHANDLER, U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE v. UNITED STATES.
    No. 480.
    Decided January 15, 1968.

      Thomas J, Kenan and Carl L. Shipley for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold for the United States.
   Per Curiam.

Upon the respondent’s suggestion of mootness and our independent examination of the papers, the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit is vacated. The case is remanded to that court with instructions to dismiss the mandamus proceedings as moot.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


text:
    BOYDEN v. CALIFORNIA.
    No. 730,
    Misc.
    Decided January 15, 1968.
   Per Curiam.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


text:
    BRASWELL MOTOR FREIGHT LINES, INC., et al. v. UNITED STATES et al.
    No. 790.
    Decided January 15, 1968.

      T. S. Christopher for appellants.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert W. Ginnane and Emmanuel H. Smith for the United States et al.; David Axelrod for Pacific Intermountain Express Co. et al., and Wentworth E. Griffin and Phillip Robinson for Transcon Lines, appellees.
   Per Curiam.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.


text:
    SEASIDE PROPERTIES, INC. v. STATE ROAD DEPARTMENT OF FLORIDA.
    No. 754.
    Decided January 15, 1968.

      Guión T. De Loach for appellant.
    P. A. Pacyna for appellee.
   Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


text:
    RANDOLPH v. UNITED STATES.
    No. 879.
    Decided January 15, 1968.

      Clyde C. Randolph, Jr., pro se, and Jerry Dee Moize for appellant.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Weisl, Morton Hollander and Jack H. Weiner for the United States.
   Per Curiam.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.


text:
    DINIS et al. v. VOLPE, GOVERNOR OF MASSACHUSETTS, et al.
    No. 882.
    Decided January 15, 1968.

      Edmund Dinis, pro se, and for other appellants.

      Elliot L. Richardson, Attorney General of Massachusetts, Howard M. Miller, Assistant Attorney General, and Mark L. Cohen, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
   Per Curiam.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.


text:
    LOUISIANA FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE COMMISSION et al. v. POINDEXTER et al.
    No. 793.
    Decided January 15, 1968.

      Victor A. Sachse, J. J. Davidson, Jr., S. W. Provensal, Jr., and C. C. Wood for appellants.

      A. P. Tureaud, Jack Greenberg and Charles H. Jones, Jr., for Poindexter et al., and Solicitor General Griswold and Assistant Attorney General Doar for the United States, appellees.
   Per Curiam.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.


author: Per Cukiam.

text:
    BUCK et ux. v. NEW JERSEY by the STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSIONER.
    No. 817.
    Decided January 15, 1968.

      James T. Dowd for appellants.

      Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, and Elias Abelson and Edward D. McKirdy, Deputy Attorneys General, for appellee.
   Per Cukiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


text:
    JAMES, STATE TREASURER OF TEXAS, et al. v. GILMORE et al.
    No. 850.
    Decided January 15, 1968.

      Crawford C. Martin, Attorney General of Texas, George M. Cowden, First Assistant Attorney General, and J. C. Davis, W. 0. Shultz II and James C. McCoy, Assistant Attorneys General, and A. J. Carubbi, Jr., for appellants.

      David R. Richards for appellees.
   Per Curiam.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.


text:
    SCHOOL COMMITTEE OF CITY OF BOSTON v. BOARD OF EDUCATION et al.
    No. 759.
    Decided January 15, 1968.

      John W. White for appellant.

      Elliot L. Richardson, Attorney General of Massachusetts, and Howard M. Miller, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
   Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


author: Per Curiam. The Chief Justice Mr. Justice Harlan

text:
    I. M. AMUSEMENT CORP. v. OHIO.
    No. 260.
    Decided January 15, 1968.

      Allen Brown for appellant.

      Melvin G. Rueger and Calvin W. Prem for appellee.
   Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court of Ohio is reversed. Redrup v. New York, 386 U. S. 767.

The Chief Justice

concurs on the ground that evidence of contemporary community standards was excluded at trial.

Mr. Justice Harlan

would affirm for the reasons set forth in his separate opinion in Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476, 496, 500-503, and in his dissenting opinion in Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U. S. 413, 455.


text:
    BAXTER et al. v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al.
    No. 858.
    Decided January 15, 1968.

      Jacob J. Kilimnik for appellants.

      Frank J. Pfizenmayer and Levy Anderson for appellees.
   Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


text:
    STRICKLAND TRANSPORTATION CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES et al.
    No. 839.
    Decided January 15, 1968.

      Ralph W. Currie and Ewell H. Muse, Jr., for appellant.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert W. Girmane and Nahum Litt for the United States et al., and Phillip Robinson for appellees Central Freight Lines, Inc., et al.
   Per Curiam.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.


text:
    KIRK, GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA, et al. v. GONG et al.
    No. 872.
    Decided January 15, 1968.

      Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and T. T. Turnbull and Robert A. Chastain, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellants.

      Thomas C. Britton, Stuart Simon, D. P. S. Paul and P. D. Thomson for appellees.
   Per Curiam.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.


text:
    UNITED STATES v. BETHLEHEM STEEL CO. et al.
    No. 130.
    Decided January 15, 1968.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Sanders, Alan S. Rosenthal and Martin Jacobs for the United States.

      David R. Owen for Bethlehem Steel Co. and William A. Grimes for Moran Towing & Transportation Co., Inc., respondents.
   Per Curiam.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgments of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit are vacated and the cause is remanded to that court for further proceedings in light of this Court’s decision in Wyandotte Transportation Co. v. United States, ante, p. 191.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


text:
    NATIONAL SMALL SHIPMENTS TRAFFIC CONFERENCE, INC., et al. v. RINGSBY TRUCK LINES, INC., et al.
    No. 163.
    Decided January 15, 1968.

      Arthur A. Arsham, John J. C. Martin and Max L. Wymore for appellants.

      LeGrand Alf Carlston and Z. L. Pearson, Jr., for appellees.

      Solicitor General Griswold, former Solicitor General Marshall and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States et al.
   Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed as moot.

Mr. Justice Douglas dissents.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


text:
    INTERNATIONAL LADIES’ GARMENT WORKERS’ UNION, LOCAL 415, et al. v. SCHERER & SONS, INC.
    No. 400
    Decided January 15, 1968.

      Morris P. Glushien for petitioners.

      Joseph A. Perkins for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The petition for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida is granted. The judgment below is reversed. Retail Clerks International Assn. v. Schermerhorn, 375 U. S. 96 (1963); Local No. 438 v. Curry, 371 U. S. 542 (1963).

Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Harlan would set this case for oral argument.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


author: Per Curiam. Mr. Justice Harlan

text:
    ROBERT-ARTHUR MANAGEMENT CORP. v. TENNESSEE ex rel. CANALE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY GENERAL.
    No. 679.
    Decided January 15, 1968.

      Longstreet Heiskell for appellant.

      George F. McCanless, Attorney General of Tennessee, and Thomas E. Fox, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.
   Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court of Tennessee is reversed. Redrup v. New York, 386 U. S. 767.

The Chief Justice would affirm.

Mr. Justice Harlan

would affirm for the reasons set forth in his separate opinion in Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476, 496, 500-503, and in his dissenting opinion in Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U. S. 413, 455.


text:
    OSBOURNE et al. v. MISSISSIPPI VALLEY BARGE LINE CO. et al.
    No. 768.
    Decided January 15, 1968.

      John L. Laubach, Jr., for appellants Osbourne et al.

      Arthur L. Winn, Jr., Samuel H. Moermatn, J. Raymond Clark and James M. Henderson for Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. et al., and Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert W. Ginnane and Fritz R. Kahn for the United States et al., appellees.
   Per Curiam.

The motions to affirm are granted and judgment is affirmed without prejudice to the presentation of an appropriate motion in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri for a modification of the injunction.


text:
    THRIFTY SHOPPERS SCRIP CO. v. UNITED STATES et al.
    No. 820.
    Decided January 15, 1968.

      David B. Gold for appellant in No. 820. Howard M. Downs for appellants in No. 849.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Turner and Daniel M. Friedman for the United States in both cases. William W. Alsup, Allyn 0. Kreps, Arnold M. Lerman, William E. Mussman and Gordon Johnson for appellees Blue Chip Stamp Co. et al. in both cases.

      Together with No. 849, Twyman, dba Bill’s Union Station, et al. v. United States et al., also on appeal from the same court.

   Per Curiam.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.


text:
    GOLDSTEIN, aka PIETRARU, et al. v. COX et al., SURROGATES OF THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK, et al.
    No. 825.
    Decided January 15, 1968.

      John R. Tintilla, Emanuel Eschwege and Novak N. Marku for petitioners.

      Louis J. Lejkowitz, Attorney General of New York, and Daniel M. Cohen, Assistant Attorney General, for respondents.
   Per Curiam.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is vacated. The case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for further consideration in light of Zschernig v. Miller, ante, p. 429.


author: Per Curiam. Mr. Justice Douglas

text:
    MILLER v. HAINES, DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HYGIENE AND CORRECTION OF OHIO, et al.
    No. 840.
    Decided January 15, 1968.

      Freeman T. Eagleson, Jr., for appellant.

      William B. Saxbe, Attorney General of Ohio, Winifred A. Dunton, Assistant Attorney General, and Charles S. Lopeman for appellees.
   Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Mr. Justice Douglas

is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.


text:
    PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF CALIFORNIA et al. v. BALTIMORE SHIPPERS & RECEIVERS ASSOCIATION, INC., et al.
    No. 846.
    Decided January 15, 1968.

      Mary Moran Pajalich and Bernard A. Peeters for appellants.

      Ronald N. Cobert and Philip R. Ehrenkranz for Baltimore Shippers & Receivers Association, Inc., et al., and Stanley E. Tobin and Carl M. Gould for Charles J. Worth Drayage Co. et al., appellees.
   Per Curiam.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.


text:
    No. 159,
    Misc.
    Quinn v. Mobil Oil Co., a Division of Socony Mobil Oil Co., Inc.

      Gonmd W. Oberdorfer for respondent.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Petition for writ of certiorari dismissed July 28, 1967, pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of this Court.


text:
    No. 262,
    Misc.
    Goodman v. Pate, Warden.
   Sup. Ct. Ill. Petition for writ of certiorari dismissed August 16, 1967, pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of this Court.


text:
    No. 49,
    Misc.
    Breckenridge v. Patterson, Warden.

      Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General of Colorado, Frank E. Hickey, Deputy Attorney General, and John P. Moore, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Petition for writ of certiorari dismissed August 29, 1967, pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of this Court.


text:
    No. 224.
    Goldfarb Novelty Co., Inc., et al. v. Uneeda Doll Co., Inc.

      Thomas R. Farrell, Jr., for Goldfarb Novelty Co., Inc., and Clarence Fried for Walgreen Eastern Co., Inc., petitioners.

      Eugene H. Zimmerman for respondent.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Petition for writ of certiorari dismissed September 21, 1967, pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of this Court.


text:
    No. 339,
    October Term, 1958.
    Spevack v. Strauss et al.,

      Carleton U. Edwards II and Joseph F. Houghton on the motion.
   359 U. S. 115. Motion for confirmation of conclusive effect of executed order denied.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.


text:
    No.-,
    October Term, 1966.
    In re Werner.
   James Lee Werner, Esquire, of Cincinnati, Ohio, having resigned as a member of the Bar of this Court, it is ordered that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice in this Court.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in this matter.


text:
    No. 624,
    October Term, 1966.
    Moody et al. v. Flowers et al.,

      Truman Hobbs on the motion.

      Cyrus R. Lewis for appellants, in opposition.
   387 U. S. 97. Motion of appellees to retax costs granted and the costs are equally divided.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.


text:
    No. 118,
    October Term, 1966.
    Dombrowski et al. v. Eastland et al.,
   387 U. S. 82. Motion of respondent J. G. Sourwine to retax costs denied.

Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.


text:
    No. 21.
    Zschernig et al. v. Miller, Administrator, et al.

      Edward Mosk on the motion.
   Appeal from Sup. Ct. Ore. (Probable jurisdiction noted, 386 U. S. 1030.) Motion of Slaff, Mosk & Rudman for leave to file brief, as amicus curiae, granted.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.


text:
    No. 16.
    No. 22.
    Mempa v. Rhay, Penitentiary Superintendent; and Walkling v. Rhay, Penitentiary Superintendent.

      Patrick J. Hughes, Jr., for National Legal Aid and Defender Association, as amicus curiae, in both cases.

      Evan L. Schwab for petitioner, and John J. O’Cormell, Attorney General of Washington, and Stephen C. Way, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent, on the motion in No. 22.
   Sup. Ct. Wash. Motion of National Legal Aid and Defender Association for leave to file a brief, as .amicus curiae, granted. Motion in No. 22 to substitute Washington State Board of Prison Terms and Paroles in place of B. J. Rhay, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary, as the party respondent granted.

[For earlier orders herein, see 386 U. S. 907, 953.]


text:
    No. 27.
    Federal Trade Commission v. Fred Meyer, Inc., et al.

      Morris B. Abram on the motion.

      Edward F. Howrey, Terrence C. Sheehy and George W. Mead for respondents in opposition.
   C. A. 9th Cir. (Certiorari granted, 386 U. S. 907.) Motion of Atlantic Coast Independent Distributors Association, Inc., for leave to file brief, as amicus curiae, granted.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.


text:
    No. 49.
    National Labor Relations Board v. Fleetwood Trailer Co., Inc.

      J. Albert Woll, Laurence Gold and Thomas E. Harris on the motion.
   C. A. 9th Cir. (Certiorari granted, 386 U. S. 990.) Motion of American Federation of Labor & Congress of Industrial Organizations for leave to file brief, as amicus curiae, granted.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.


text:
    No. 33.
    United Mine Workers of America, District 12 v. Illinois State Bar Association et al.

      J. Albert Woll, Laurence Gold and Thomas E. Harris for American Federation of Labor & Congress of Industrial Organizations, Victor Rabinowitz, Allan Brotsky and Donald L. A. Kerson for National Lawyers Guild, Joseph A. Ball, John J. Goldberg and Samuel 0. Pruitt, Jr., for State Bar of California, Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III and Melvyn Zarr for NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc., et al., on the motions.

      Edmund Burke, Edward L. Carey, Harrison Combs, Willard P. Owens and M. E. Boiarsky for petitioner, and Bernard H. Bertrand for respondents, in opposition.
   Sup. Ct. Ill. (Certiorari granted, 386 U. S. 941.) Motions of American Federation of Labor & Congress of Industrial Organizations, National Lawyers Guild and State Bar of California for leave to file briefs, as amici curiae, granted. Motion of NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc., et al. for leave to file brief, as amici curiae, granted. Motions of NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc., et al. and State Bar of California for leave to participate in oral argument, as amici curiae, denied.


text:
    No. 67.
    Terry et al. v. Ohio.

      Jack G. Day on the motions.
   Sup. Ct. Ohio. (Cer-tiorari granted, 387 U. S. 929.) Motions of petitioner Terry for leave to proceed further herein in forma pau-peris and to dispense with printing record granted.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.


text:
    No. 386,
    Misc.
    Sims v. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare.

      Israel Steingold on the motion.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Motion of American Trial Lawyers Association for leave to file brief, as >amicus curiae, granted.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.


text:
    No. 43.
    Albrecht v. Herald Co., dba Globe-Democrat Publishing Co.

      Lon Kocker on the motion.

      Donald S. Siegel and Gray L. Dorsey for petitioner in opposition.
   C. A. 8th Cir. (Certiorari granted, 386 U. S. 941.) Further consideration of motion of respondent to dismiss writ of certiorari postponed to hearing of case on the merits.


text:
    No. 85.
    United States v. Jackson et al.

      Steven Duke and Stephen I. Trauh on the motion.
   Appeal from D. C. Conn. (Probable jurisdiction noted, 387 U. S. 929.) Motion of appellee Jackson for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis granted.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.


text:
    No. 86.
    United States v. Third National Bank in Nashville et al.

      Joseph J. O’Malley on the motion for appellee Comptroller of the Currency.
   Appeal from D. C. M. D. Tenn. (Probable jurisdiction noted, 388 U. S. 905.) Motion of Comptroller of the Currency to remove case from summary calendar granted.

Mr. Justice Fortas and Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.


text:
    No. 90 et al.
    Permian Basin Area Rate Cases.

      J. David Mann, Jr., and John E. Holt-zinger, Jr., on the motion.
   C. A. 10th Cir. (Certiorari granted, 388 U. S. 906.) Motion of Associated Gas Distributors Group for leave to file brief, as amicus curiae, granted.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.


text:
    No. 147.
    K-91, Inc. v. Gershwin Publishing Corp. et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief expressing the views of the United States.


text:
    No. 246.
    No. 247.
    No. 319.
    No. 387.
    Moses et al. v. Washington et al. Appeal from Sup. Ct. Wash.; Puyallup Tribe v. Department of Game of Washington et al. Sup. Ct. Wash.; Kautz et al. v. Department of Game of Washington et al. Sup. Ct. Wash.; and Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes of the Fort Peck Indian Reservation v. Nordwick, Executor, et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. The Solicitor General is invited to file briefs in these cases expressing the views of the United States.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this order.


text:
    No. 241,
    Misc.
    Nevada Tax Commission v. Thompson, U. S. District Judge, et al.

      Harvey Dickerson, Attorney General of Nevada, for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Rogovin and Harold C. Wilkenjeld for respondent Thompson et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. and D. C. Nev. Motion for leave to file petition for writ of certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.


text:
    No. 196,
    Misc.
    Vnuk, aka Anthony v. Pitchess, Sheriff.

      G. G. Baumen on the motion.
   Motion for leave to file petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.


text:
    No. 54,
    No. 391,
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Nelms v. United States; and Dow, aka Corey v. Attorney General of the United States.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States, in opposition in both cases.
   Motions for leave to file petitions for writs of habeas corpus denied.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.


text:
    No. 179,
    Misc.
    In re Disbarment of Lombard.
   It having been reported to the Court that Earl J. Lombard of Washington, District of Columbia, has been disbarred from the practice of law by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, duly entered on the eighteenth day of May, 1967, and this Court by order of June 5, 1967, having suspended the said Earl J. Lombard from the practice of law in this Court and directing that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred;

And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent, and that the time within which to file a return to the rule has expired;

It Is Ordered that the said Earl J. Lombard be, and he is hereby, disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.


text:
    No. 156,
    Misc.
    Kennedy v. Commandant, United States Disciplinary Barracks, Fort Leavenworth.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for respondent in opposition.
   Motion for leave to file petition for writ of habeas corpus and other relief denied.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.


text:
    No. 221,
    Misc.
    Utica Mutual Insurance Co. v. United States District Court for the Northern District of New York et al.

      Charles J. Barnhill on the motion.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli and Norton J. Come for National Labor Relations Board in opposition.
   Motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus denied.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.


text:
    No. 152,
    No. 172,
    No. 186,
    No. 228,
    No. 243,
    No. 270,
    No. 289,
    No. 293,
    No. 354,
    No. 381,
    No. 400,
    No. 401,
    No. 458,
    No. 522,
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Welsh v. California et al.; Gaito v. Duggan, District Attorney, et al.; Hector v. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit; In re Barash; Baker v. McNaul; Blackburn v. Florida; McGarrity v. Nelson, Acting Warden; Mason v. Warden, Southern Michigan State Prison; Meyer v. Field, Mens Colony Superintendent; Denson v. Lane, Warden; Cottlo v. California et al.; Spearmint v. Ohio et al.; Baker v. Bennett, Warden; and Oughton v. Meier, Warden.
   Motions for leave to file petitions for writs of habeas corpus denied.


text:
    No. 145,
    No. 178,
    No. 239,
    No. 321,
    No. 340,
    No. 419,
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Fisk v. Currie, Chief Justice, Supreme Court of Wisconsin; Chope v. Thornton, U. S. District Judge; Blackwell v. Currie, Chief Justice, Supreme Court of Wisconsin, et al.; Ballou v. Aldrich et al., U. S. Circuit Judges; Luomala v. Kunzel, U. S. District Judge; and Rucker v. California Department of Corrections et al.
   Motions for leave to file petitions for writs of mandamus denied.


text:
    No. 240,
    No. 416,
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Workman v. Turner, Warden; and Forester v. Field, Mens Colony Superintendent, et al.
   Motions for leave to file petitions for writs of habeas corpus denied. Treating the papers submitted as petitions for writs of certiorari, cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 368,
    Misc.
    Board of Regents of the University of Texas et al. v. Goldberg, U. S. Circuit Judge, et al.

      Crawford C. Martin, Attorney General of Texas, George M. Cowden, First Assistant Attorney General, J. C. Davis, W. O. Shultz II and James C. McCoy, Assistant Attorneys General, and A. J. Carubbi, Jr., on the motion.

      David R. Richards for Gilmore et al., in opposition.
   Motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition denied.


text:
    No. 111,
    Misc.
    Cameron et al. v. Johnson, Governor of Mississippi, et al.

      Arthur Kinoy, William M. Kunstler, Benjamin E. Smith, Bruce C. Waltzer and Morton Stavis for appellants.

      Joe T. Patterson, Attorney General of Mississippi, and Will S. Wells and William A. Attain, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.
   Appeal from D. C. S. D. Miss. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Probable jurisdiction noted and case transferred to appellate docket.


text:
    No. 410.
    Duncan v. Louisiana.

      Richard B. Sobol, Alvin J. Bronstein and Anthony G. Amsterdam for appellant.
   Appeal from Sup. Ct. La. Probable jurisdiction noted and case set for oral argument immediately following No. 52 (386 U. S. 1003).


text:
    No. 405.
    Powell v. Texas.

      Lawrence Speiser for appellant.

      Crawford C. Martin, Attorney General of Texas, George M. Cowden, First Assistant Attorney General, Robert L. Lattimore, Assistant Attorney General, and A. J. Ca-rubbi, Jr., for appellee.
   Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1, Travis County. Probable jurisdiction noted.


text:
    No. 196.
    Schneider v. Smith, Commandant, United States Coast Guard.

      John Caughlan for appellant.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Yeagley, Kevin T. Maroney and Lee B. Anderson for appellee.
   Appeal (from D. C. W. D. Wash. Motion to dispense with printing the jurisdictional statement granted. Further consideration of the question of jurisdiction in this case is postponed to the hearing of the case on the merits.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the (Consideration or decision of this case.


text:
    No. 107.
    United States v. Habig et al.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Rogovin and Joseph M. Howard for the United States.

      Lester M. Ponder for appellees.
   Appeal from D. C. S. D. Ind. Probable jurisdiction noted.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


text:
    No. 324.
    Norfolk & Western Railway Co. et al. v. Missouri State Tax Commission et al.

      William H. Allen, Christopher S. Bond and Charles L. Bacon for appellants.

      Norman H. Anderson, Attorney General of Missouri, and John H. Denman, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
   Appeal from Sup. Ct. Mo. Probable jurisdiction noted.


text:
    No. 276.
    Hopkins v. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare.

      Allen Sharp for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Marshall for respondent.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari granted.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 187.
    Menominee Tribe of Indians v. United States.

      Charles A. Hobbs and Angelo A. ladarola for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.
   Ct. Cl. Certiorari granted.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 60.
    No. 61.
    No. 62.
    No. 80.
    No. 97.
    No. 111.
    No. 143.
    No. 144.
    No. 231.
    Federal Power Commission v. Sunray DX Oil Co. et al.; United Gas Improvement Co. v. Sunray DX Oil Co. et al.; Brooklyn Union Gas Co. et al. v. Federal Power Commission et al.; Federal Power Commission v. Standard Oil Co. of Texas, a Division of Chevron Oil Co., et al.; United Gas Improvement Co. v. Sunray DX Oil Co. C. A. 10th Cir.; Shell Oil Co. v. Public Service Commission of New York; Skelly Oil Co. et al. v. Public Service Commission of New York et al.; Federal Power Commission v. Public Service Commission of New York et al.; and Superior Oil Co. v. Federal Power Commission et al.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari granted. The cases are consolidated and a total of nine hours is allotted for oral argument.

Solicitor General Marshall, Ralph S. Spritzer, Richard A. Posner, Richard A. Solomon, Howard E. Wahrenbrock and Cyril S. Wofsy for petitioner in No. 60.

William T. Coleman, Jr., Robert W. Maris, Richardson Dilworth and Harold E. Kohn for petitioner in Nos. 61 and 97.

Edwin F. Russell, Harry G. Hill, Jr., and Barbara M. Suchow for Brooklyn Union Gas Co.; Bertram D. Moll and Morton L. Simons for Long Island Lighting Co.; Samuel Graff Miller for Philadelphia Electric Co., and Kent H. Brown for Public Service Commission of New York, petitioners in No. 62.

Solicitor General Marshall and Mr. Solomon for petitioner in No. 80.

Oliver L. Stone and Thomas G. Johnson for petitioner in No. 111.

Sherman S. Poland for Skelly Oil Co.; Martin N. Erck for Humble Oil & Refining Co., and Bernard A. Foster, Jr., for Dougherty et al., petitioners in No. 143.

Solicitor General Marshall, Mr. Solomon, Peter H. Schiff and Joel Yohalem for petitioner in No. 144.

Herbert W. Varner and Murray Christian for petitioner in No. 231.

Homer E. McEwen, Jr., for Sunray DX Oil Co.; Mr. Erck for Humble Oil & Refining Co.; Vernon W. Woods for Union Producing Co.; Richard F. Remmers for Sohio Petroleum Co.; William K. Tell, Jr., and James D. An-nett for Texaco Inc.; Warren M. Sparks for Gulf Oil Corp.; Kiel Boone for Cox; Phillip D. Endom, Robert E. May and Francis H. Caskin for Sun Oil Co., and Thomas G. Crouch, Robert W. Henderson and Donald K. Young for Hunt, respondents in Nos. 60, 61 and 62. Solicitor General Marshall and Mr. Solomon for the Federal Power Commission, respondent in Nos. 61 and 62.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.

Francis R. Kirkham and Justin R. Wolf for respondent Standard Oil Co. of Texas in No. 80. Mr. McEwen for Sunray DX Oil Co.; Messrs. Tell and Arnett for Texaco Inc.; Messrs. Endom, May and Gaskin for Sun Oil Co.; Mr. Remmers for Sohio Petroleum Co.; Mr. Erck for Humble Oil & Refining Co.; Robert V. Smith for Patchin-Wilmoth Industries, Inc.; J. Evans Attwell and W. H. Drushel, Jr., for Clark Fuel Producing Co.; Mr. Boone for Cox; Messrs. Crouch, Henderson and Young for Hunt; and Mr. Poland for Coates, respondents in Nos. 80 and 97.

Messrs. Simons, Brown and Moll for respondents in Nos. Ill, 143 and 144.

Solicitor General Marshall, Messrs. Solomon, Schiff and Yohalem for the Federal Power Commission; Messrs. Brown and Simons for Public Service Commission of New York; and Mr. Moll for Long Island Lighting Co., respondents in No. 231.

Reported below: Nos. 60, 61 and 62, 370 F. 2d 181; Nos. 80 and 97, 376 F. 2d 578; Nos. 111, 143, 144 and 231, 126 U. S. App. D. C. 26, 373 F. 2d 816.


text:
    No. 59.
    Banks v. Chicago Grain Trimmers Association, Inc., et al.

      Harold A. Lieben-son for petitioner.

      Thomas P. Smith for respondents. Solicitor General Marshall for the Deputy Commissioner (Department of Labor).
   C. A. 7th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to intervene granted. Certiorari granted.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and petition.

[For earlier orders herein, see 386 U. S. 1002, 387 U. S. 939.]


text:
    No. 65.
    Poafpybitty et al. v. Skelly Oil Co.

      Charles Hill Johns and Houston Bus Hill for petitioners.

      John H. Cantrell and S. W. Wells for respondent.

      Solicitor General Marshall for the United States, as amicus curiae.

   Sup. Ct. Okla. Certiorari granted.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 219.
    Peoria Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma et al. v. United States.

      Jack Joseph and Louis L. Rochmes for petitioners.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Weisl and S. Billingsley Hill for the United States.
   Ct. Cl. Certiorari granted.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 232.
    No. 233.
    United States v. O’Brien; and O’Brien v. United States.

      Solicitor General Marshall for the United States in No. 232.

      Marvin M. Karpatkin, Howard S. Whiteside and Melvin L. Wulf for petitioner in No. 233.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States in No. 233.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari granted.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.

Reported below: 376 F. 2d 538.


text:
    No. 267.
    United States v. Neifert-White Co.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Acting Assistant Attorney General Eardley, Alan S. Rosenthal and Richard S. Salzman for the United States.

      Michael J. Hughes for respondent.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 339.
    Newman et al. v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc., et al.

      Matthew J. Perry, Lincoln C. Jenkins, Jr., Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III and Michael Meltsner for petitioners.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari granted.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 73.
    In re Ruffalo.

      Henry C. Robinson for Mahoning County Bar Association, and Samuel T. Gaines and P. Paul Pusateri for Ohio State Bar Association.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari granted.

Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. Craig Spangenberg for petitioner.


text:
    No. 178.
    No. 179.
    National Labor Relations Board v. United Insurance Co. of America et al.; and Insurance Workers International Union, AFL-CIO v. National Labor Relations Board et al.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli and Norton J. Come for petitioner in No. 178.

      Bernard G. Segal and Irving R. Segal for respondent United Insurance Co. of America in both cases.

      Isaac N. Groner and Alan Y. Cole for petitioner in No. 179.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari granted. Cases are consolidated.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.

Reported below: 371 F. 2d 316.


text:
    No. 149.
    Dyke et al. v. Taylor Implement Manufacturing Co., Inc.

      Bernard Kleiman, Elliot Bred-hojj, Michael Gottesman and Tom J. Taylor for petitioners.

      Foster D. Arnett for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Tenn. Certiorari granted and case set for oral argument immediately following No. 92 (386 U. S. 1003).


text:
    No. 305.
    Securities and Exchange Commission v. New England Electric System et al.

      Former Solicitor General Marshall, Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Richard A. Posner, Philip A. Loomis, Jr., and Roger S. Foster for petitioner.

      John R. Quarles, Richard B. Dunn, Richard W. Southgate and John J. Glessner III for respondents.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari granted.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 257.
    No. 258.
    Federal Maritime Commission et al. v. Aktiebolaget Svenska Amerika Linien (Swedish American Line) et al.; and American Society of Travel Agents, Inc. v. Aktiebolaget Svenska Amerika Linien (Swedish American Line) et al.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Irwin A. Seibel, Robert N. Katz and Walter H. Mayo III for petitioners Federal Maritime Commission et al. in No. 257.

      Robert J. Sisk, Harold S. Barron, Neil Peck and Glen A. Wilkinson for petitioner American Society of Travel Agents, Inc., in both cases.

      Edward R. Neaher and Carl S. Rowe for respondents in both cases.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari granted. Cases are consolidated.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.

Reported below: 125 U. S. App. D. C. 359, 372 F. 2d 932.


text:
    No. 291,
    Misc.
    Johnson v. Massachusetts.

      John M. Harrington, Jr., for petitioner.

      Elliot L. Richardson, Attorney General of Massachusetts, and Brian E. Concannon, Special Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   Sup. Jud. Ct. Mass. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Case transferred to appellate docket.


text:
    No. 261.
    No. 262.
    No. 266.
    No. 388.
    City and County of San Francisco v. Skelly Oil Co. et al.; City of San Diego v. Skelly Oil Co. et al.; Standard Oil Co. of Texas, a Division of Chevron Oil Co. v. Federal Power Commission; and Mobil Oil Corp. et al. v. Federal Power Commission.

      Thomas M. O’Connor for petitioner in No. 261.

      Edward T. Butler for petitioner in No. 262.

      Francis R. Kirkham and Justin R. Wolf for petitioner in No. 266.

      Tom P. Hamill, William H. Tabb and Carroll L. Gilliam for petitioners in No. 388.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari granted. Cases are consolidated with other “Permian Basin Area Rate Cases” (388 U. S. 906; supra, at 806) and set for argument on Monday, December 4, 1967. Briefs of those parties supporting the order of the Federal Power Commission shall be filed on or before November 1, 1967, and of those attacking said order shall be filed on or before November 20, 1967.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.

Reported below: 375 F. 2d 6.


text:
    No. 309.
    No. 310.
    American Federation of Musicians of the United States and Canada et al. v. Carroll et al.; and Carroll et al. v. American Federation of Musicians of the United States and Canada et al.

      Henry Kaiser, Eugene Gressman, George Kauf-mann, Ronald Rosenberg and David I. Ashe for petitioners in No. 309 and respondents in No. 310.

      Godfrey P. Schmidt for respondents in No. 309 and petitioners in No. 310.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted. The cases are consolidated and two hours are allotted for oral argument.

The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.

Reported below: 372 F. 2d 155.


text:
    No. 325.
    Watts et al. v. Seward School Board et al.

      George Kaufmann for petitioners.

      Theodore M. Pease, Jr., for respondents.
   Sup. Ct. Alaska. Motion to dispense with printing the petition granted. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 335.
    No. 463.
    Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe Machinery Corp.; and United Shoe Machinery Corp. v. Hanover Shoe, Inc.

      James V. Hayes, Breck P. McAllister and Robert F. Morten for petitioner in No. 335 and respondent in No. 463.

      Ralph M. Carson, Robert D. Salinger, Philip C. Potter, Jr., and Roland W. Donnem for respondent in No. 335 and petitioner in No. 463.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari granted. The cases are consolidated and two hours are allotted for oral argument.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.

Reported below: 377 F. 2d 776.


text:
    No. 109,
    Misc.
    Bruton v. United States.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Case transferred to appellate docket and set for oral argument immediately following No. 66, Mise, (infra).

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and petition.


text:
    No. 66,
    Misc.
    Garner v. Yeager, Warden, et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Case transferred to appellate docket.


text:
    No. 19,
    Misc.
    Anderson v. Johnson, Warden.

      George F. McCanless, Attorney General of Tennessee, and Henry C. Foutch, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Motion for leave to proceed m forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Case transferred to appellate docket.


text:
    No. 36,
    Misc.
    In re Whittington.

      Judson C. Kistler for petitioner.

      E. Raymond Morehart for the State of Ohio.
   Ct. App. Ohio, Fairfield County. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Case transferred to appellate docket.

[For earlier order herein, see 387 U. S. 940.]


text:
    No. 445.
    Avco Corp. v. Aero Lodge No. 735, International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workers, et al.

      William Waller and John B. Hollister for petitioner.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 55,
    Misc.
    Barber v. Page, Warden.

      G. T. Blankenship, Attorney General of Oklahoma, and Charles L. Owens, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Case transferred to appellate docket.


text:
    No. 112.
    Gian-Cursio et al. v. Florida.

      F. Lee Bailey for petitioners.
   Sup. Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 116.
    Hallinan v. Roman Catholic Archbishop of San Francisco et al.

      Vincent Hallmcm for petitioner.

      John F. Duff for respondent Roman Catholic Archbishop of San Francisco, and Noel J. Dyer for respondent University of San Francisco.
   Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 118.
    Compania Anonima Venezolano de Navegacion v. Matthews et al.

      Leon Sarpy and Paul A. Naliy for petitioner.

      John P. Dowling for respondent Matthews.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 125.
    No. 140.
    General Plywood Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.; and United States Plywood Corp. v. General Plywood Corp.

      John A. Blair and Everett B. Casey for petitioner in No. 125 and respondent in No. 140.

      Morris Relson and James M. Heilman for petitioner in No. 140 and respondent in No. 125.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Reported below: 370 F. 2d 500.


text:
    No. 128.
    Doff et al. v. Brunswick Corp.

      Marcus Mattson for respondent.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 132.
    Roderick, Trustee, et al. v. Chugach Electric Association.

      Edgar Paul Boyko for petitioners.

      Robert W. Graham for respondent.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 136.
    Minichiello v. Royal Business Funds Corp.

      Reginald Leo Duff for petitioner.

      Morton L. Ginsberg and David W. Peck for respondent.
   Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 137.
    Lee v. St. Joe Paper Co.

      Reginald Leo Duff for petitioner.

      David W. Peck and Irving Rozen for respondent.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 142.
    Pacific Sportfishing, Inc., et al. v. Berry.

      Carl J. Schuck for petitioners.

      Ben Margolis and William B. Murrish for respondent.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 146.
    Ring v. Strelecki, Director of Motor Vehicles, et al.

      Carl E. Ring for petitioner.

      Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, Alan B. Handler, First Assistant Attorney General, and Alan D. Kirby and Richard Newman, Deputy Attorneys General, for respondents.
   Super. Ct. N. J. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 150.
    Fisher v. Arkansas.

      Fletcher Jackson for petitioner.

      Joe Purcell, Attorney General of Arkansas, and R. D. Smith III, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Ark. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 152.
    LaHitte et vir v. Acme Refrigeration Supplies, Inc., et al.
   Sup. Ct. La. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 153.
    Kimbrell v. Perry et al.

      W. A. Harwell for respondents.
   Sup. Ct. Tenn. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 162.
    Tidewater Patent Development Co., Inc. v. Kitchen et al., trading as K. M. Kitchen Beauty Supply Co.

      George B. Finnegan, Jr., and William D. Denson for petitioner.

      Samuel J. Stoll for respondents.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 157.
    Smith v. Texas.

      Edward V. Dylla for petitioner.
   Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 161.
    Cohen, Trustee in Bankruptcy v. James Talcott, Inc., et al.

      Aaron Cohen, pro se, and Harry R. Levy for petitioner.

      Morris M. Wexler for respondents.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 175.
    No. 191.
    Provident Security Life Insurance Co. et al. v. DePinto et al.; and DePinto et al. v. Provident Security Life Insurance Co. et al.

      William Lee McLane and Nola McLane for petitioners in No. 175, and together with Thaddeus Rojek, Harold E. Kohn and William T. Coleman, Jr., for respondents in No. 191.

      Denison Kitchel and John P. Frank for respondents in No. 175 and petitioners in No. 191.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Reported below: 374 F. 2d 37.


text:
    No. 182.
    Kligerman et al. v. Lynch, President of the Senate of New Jersey, et al.

      Patrick T. McGahn, Jr., for petitioners.

      Thomas F. Connery, Jr., for respondents.
   Sup. Ct. N. J. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 184.
    Riffe v. Wilshire Oil Co. of Texas.

      Gerald G. Stamper for petitioner.

      Richard H. Shaw for respondent.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 185.
    Coyne, Administrator v. John Mohr & Sons, Inc.

      Edward J. Balzarini and Joseph W. Conway for petitioner.

      Norman J. Cowie for respondent.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 186.
    Hensley v. Fort Worth & Denver Railway Co.

      Denning Schattman for petitioner.

      Thos. H. Law for respondent.
   Ct. Civ. App. Tex., 2d Sup. Jud. Dist. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 189.
    Novo Industrial Corp. v. Standard Screw Co.

      Thomas F. McWilliams for petitioner.

      Thomas A. Reynolds, Jr., Robert F. Davis and John H. Lewis, Jr., for respondent.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 206.
    Coe Manufacturing Co. v. Jeddeloh Brothers Sweed Mills, Inc., et al.

      James T. Hoffmann for petitioner.

      J. Pierre Kolisch for respondents.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 207.
    Jackson et al. v. Western Geothermal, Inc., et al.

      Roy B. Woolsey and Gilbert W. Boyne for petitioners.

      Owen Jameson for respondent Western Geothermal, Inc.
   Sup. Ct. Nev. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 210.
    Continental Casualty Co. v. Float-Away Door Co. et al.

      E. Smythe Gambrell and Charles A. Moye, Jr., for petitioner.

      Edward E. Dorsey for respondent Float-Away Door Co.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 214.
    Troy Cannon Construction Co., Inc. v. Job et al.

      J. M. Costello and William G. Porter for petitioner.

      Walter J. Bradsky for respondent Job, and Robert W. Gunderson for respondent Grand Electric Cooperative, Inc.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 211.
    United Bond & Mortgage Corp. v. Crown Central Petroleum Corp.

      N. Welch Morrisette, Jr., for petitioner.

      Irvine F. Belser for respondent.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 213.
    Cahn v. Nicholas, Trustee.

      Richard R. Booth for petitioner.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 218.
    Purex Corp., Ltd., et al. v. St. Louis National Stockyards Co.

      Lon HocJcer for petitioners.

      John C. Shepherd for respondent.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 220.
    Walker v. California.

      Clarence H. Pease for petitioner.
   Ct. App. Cal., 3d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 222.
    Sisko v. Southern Resin & Fiberglass Corp.

      Francis D. Thomas, Jr., and George N. Hibhen for petitioner.

      Charles Buchanan Smith for respondent.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 226.
    Collins et al. v. Tennessee.

      William Earl Badgett for petitioners.

      George F. McCanless, Attorney General of Tennessee, and Thomas E. Fox, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Tenn. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 238.
    Tax Review Board of Philadelphia v. Esso Standard Division of Humble Oil & Refining Co.

      Levy Anderson for petitioner.

      Park B. Dilks, Jr., for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 228.
    Nicholson v. Lowenstein.

      William A. Cain for petitioner.
   Sup. Ct. Ill. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 230.
    Sorensen v. Swanson.

      Ralph R. Bremers and William L. Walker for petitioner.
   Sup. Ct. Neb. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 239.
    Isaacs et al. v. City of Oklahoma City et al.

      Ted R. Fisher for petitioners.

      Roy H. Semtner and Walter Powell for City of Oklahoma City, James B. White for Oklahoma City Urban Renewal Authority, Finis Smith and Darven Broion for Tulsa Urban Renewal Authority, and Charles E. Norman for City of Tulsa, respondents.
   Sup. Ct. Okla. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 240.
    Arkwright Mutual Insurance Co. v. Bargain City, U. S. A., Inc.

      George E. Beechwood for petitioner.

      Paul L. Jaffe for respondent.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 244.
    Natoli v. Hamilton et al.

      Jacob J. Kilimmik for petitioner.

      Brady 0. Bryson for respondents.
   Sup. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 245.
    Grogan et al. v. Wachter.

      Harry H. Craig for petitioners.

      Harold I. Elbert for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Mo. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 248.
    O'Brien v. Socony Mobil Oil Co. (successor to Virginia-Carolina Chemical Corp.).

      James F. X. O’Brien for petitioner.

      John S. Battle, Jr., for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. N. J. and/or Sup. Ct. App. Va. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 249.
    Anchor Hocking Glass Corp. v. Corning Glass Works.

      Arthur G. Connolly, Edmund P. Wood and William J. Wier, Jr., for petitioner.

      Clair John Killoran and Clarence R. Patty, Jr., for respondent.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 251.
    Collins v. Tennessee.

      William Earl Badgett for petitioner.

      George F. McCanless, Attorney General of Tennessee, and Thomas E. Fox, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Tenn. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 264.
    Frazier v. North Carolina State Bar.

      Samuel S. Mitchell, Romallus 0. Murphy, Moses Burt, Jr., Herman L. Taylor, John H. Wheeler and Charles Morgan, Jr., for petitioner.

      John H. Anderson for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. N. C. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 277.
    Jack Neilson, Inc. v. Thomas Jordan, Inc.

      Nathan Greenberg for petitioner.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 280.
    Kenney v. Pancake Kitchens, Inc., et al.

      Robert M. Alexander for petitioner.
   Sup. Ct. App. Va. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 285.
    Dell v. Illinois.

      Julius Lucius Echeles for petitioner.
   App. Ct. Ill., 2d Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 286.
    Florman v. Illinois.

      Julius Lmcius Echeles for petitioner.
   App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 289.
    Alvarez et al. v. Pan American Life Insurance Co.

      Joseph A. McGowan for petitioners.

      James A. Dixon and Sam Daniels for respondent.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 295.
    Callis et al. v. Long Island Railroad Co.

      Lee S. Kreindler and Paul S. Edelman for petitioners.

      William L. F. Gardiner for respondent.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 304.
    Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Air Line Pilots Association, International, et al.

      Henry Halladay for petitioner.

      Edward M. Glennon and Allen E. Gramza for respondents.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 308.
    Hoelsken et al., dba Active Rubbish Service v. Public Utilities Commission of Colorado et al.

      Anthony F. Zarlengo for petitioners.

      Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General of Colorado, Frank E. Hickey, Deputy Attorney General, and Robert Lee Kessler, Assistant Attorney General, for Public Utilities Commission of Colorado, and Thomas F. Kilroy for Schlagel, respondents.
   Sup. Ct. Colo. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 312.
    Lugash et al. v. Santa Anita Manufacturing Corp.

      Frederick E. Mueller and Robert W. Fulwider for petitioners.

      C. A. Miketta and William Poms for respondent.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 314.
    Southern Railway Co. v. Bryan.

      Charles J. Bloch and Richard S. Arnold for petitioner.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 294.
    Williams v. Illinois.

      B. Eugene Pincham for petitioner.
   Sup. Ct. Ill. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 329.
    Ove Skou Rederi A/S et al. v. Marshall et al.

      Robert F. Adams for petitioners.

      Michael J. Salmon for respondents.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 331.
    Simon v. Weingold, Public Administrator.
    /. Stanley Shaw for petitioner.

      Paul J. Reid for respondent.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 333.
    Seville Syndicate, Inc., et al. v. Kozlowski.

      Irving Anolik for petitioners.

      Isadore Nathanson for respondent.
   App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 1st Jud. Dept. Certio-rari denied.


text:
    No. 340.
    Nivens et al. v. North Carolina.

      Walter B. Nivens, pro se, Charles V. Bell and Calvin Brown for petitioners.

      T. W. Bruton, Attorney General of North Carolina, and Ralph Moody, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. N. C. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 341.
    Vlasak v. Ohio.

      Robert R. Disbro and Richard M. Markus for petitioner.

      John T. Corrigan for respondent.
   Ct. App. Ohio, Cuyahoga County. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 364.
    St. Joe Paper Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. et al.

      Chester Bedell and C. Harris Dittmar for petitioner.

      Charles Cook Howell, Jr., for Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., and Earl B. Hadlow for Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York, respondents.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 342.
    Blair Manufacturing Co. v. Hampton et al.

      James J. Fitzgerald, Jr., for petitioner.

      John J. Hanley for respondents.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 351.
    Falla y Alvarez v. Pan-American Life Insurance Co.

      Samuel Sheradsky for petitioner.

      James A. Dixon and Sam Daniels for respondent.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 355.
    All Concessions, Inc. v. City of Peabody.

      Edward J. Davis for petitioner.
   Sup. Jud. Ct. Mass. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 360.
    Hoff Research & Development Laboratories, Inc. v. Philippine National Bank et al.

      Arnold Davis for petitioner.

      Matthew E. McCarthy for respondents.
   Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 367.
    Atkins v. Schmutz Manufacturing Co., Inc.

      Frank C. Maloney III for petitioner.

      John P. Sandidge for respondent.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 369.
    Ephraim Freightways, Inc. v. Red Ball Motor Freight, Inc.

      Thomas F. Kilroy and John H. Lewis for petitioner.

      Harry C. Ames, Jr., for respondent.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 377.
    Zilk et al. v. Deaton’s Fountain Service.

      Carl Hoppe for petitioners.

      James M. Naylor and Frank A. Neal for respondent.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 366.
    American Investors Fund, Inc. v. Fogel et al.

      Clendon H. Lee for petitioner.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 375.
    Licavoli v. Ohio.

      Moses Krislov, P. D. Maktos and John Maktos for petitioner.
   Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 381.
    Local Union No. 721, United Packinghouse, Food & Allied Workers, AFL-CIO v. Needham Packing Co., dba Sioux City Dressed Beef.

      Eugene Cotton, Richard F. Watt and Harry H. Smith for petitioner.

      Stuart Roth-man, Robert D. Larsen, Jesse E. Marshall and James A. Gilker for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Iowa. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 392.
    Brush et al., dba Brush & Bloch v. Republic of Cuba et al.

      Jac M. Wolff for petitioners.

      Leonard B. Boudin and Victor Rabinowitz for respondents.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 395.
    Motorola, Inc. v. Armstrong, Executrix.

      Foorman L. Mueller, Eugene Gressman and Francis G. Cole for petitioner.

      Dana M. Raymond, George B. Turner and George N. Hibben for respondent.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 403.
    Southern Railway Co. v. Chambers et al.

      Charles A. Horsky for petitioner.

      Frank J. Dougherty, Jr., for respondents.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 404.
    DeStasio v. New Jersey.

      Michael A. Querques for petitioner.
   Sup. Ct. N. J. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 398.
    Thor-Dahl A/S v. Crescent Wharf & Warehouse Co.

      L. Robert Wood for petitioner.

      Henry E. Happier for respondent.
   Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 408.
    Monroe Sander Corp. v. Livingston, President of District 65, Retail, Wholesale & Department Store Union, AFL-CIO.

      Julius Weiss and Winthrop A. Johns for petitioner.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 409.
    Standard Electrica, S. A. v. Hamburg Sudamerikanische Dampfschiffahrts-Gesellschaft.

      Seymour Simon for petitioner.

      James M. Estabrook for respondent.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 413.
    Rogers v. Zingheim.

      Edward R. Minor for petitioner.
   Ct. App. Cal., 4th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 414.
    Bumgarner et al. v. Joe Brown Co., Inc.

      George Camp for petitioners.

      Robert J. Emery for respondent.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 420.
    Glazer et al. v. Glazer.

      John W. Douglas, Alfred H. Moses and Edward J. Grenier, Jr., for petitioners.

      R. Emmett Kerrigan and René H. Himel, Jr., for respondent.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 422.
    Goldsmith v. Goldsmith.

      Clifton F. Weidlich for petitioner.

      Gerald I. Lustig for respondent.
   Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 424.
    Taylor v. Kentucky.

      David Kaplan for petitioner.
   Ct. App. Ky. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 426.
    Scott, aka Montague v. WKJG, Inc., et al.

      Albert L. Jeffers for petitioner.

      Eugene L. Girden for respondents.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 429.
    Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., et al.

      John A. Hickman for petitioner.

      W. James Kronzer for respondents Craig et al.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 431.
    Continental Casualty Co. v. Pfeifer.

      William A. Mann for petitioner.

      J err old V. Powers for respondent.
   Ct. App. Md. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 435.
    Sateriale v. California.
   Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 438.
    Rhinehart v. Washington.

      Arval A. Morris for petitioner.
   Sup. Ct. Wash. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 440.
    Baptist v. Bankers Indemnity Co.

      Frank F. Ober for petitioner.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 473.
    Southern Rambler Sales, Inc. v. American Motors Corp. et al.

      Charles A. O’Niell, Jr., for petitioner.

      C. Murphy Moss, Jr., for respondents.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 76.
    Benn v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

      Eugene Gress-man for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Rogovin and Thomas L. Stapleton for respondent.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 81.
    No. 84.
    No. 114.
    Tomaszck et al. v. United States; LaJoy v. United States; and Schang v. United States.

      Frank G. Whalen for petitioners in No. 81.

      Maurice J. Walsh for petitioner in No. 84.

      Eugene T. Devitt for petitioner in No. 114.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Ronald L. Gainer for the United States in all three cases.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Reported below: 373 F. 2d 307.


text:
    No. 83.
    Crowe v. United States.

      John Merwin Bader for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Julia P. Cooper for the United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 94.
    Aiken v. United States.

      George W. Shadoan and Frederick T. Stant, Jr., for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Mervyn Hamburg for the United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 96.
    Jersey State Bank v. Royal Indemnity Co. et al.

      Louis S. Papa for petitioner.

      William F. Kelly and Richard H. Nicolaides for respondent Royal Indemnity Co.
   Ct. Cl. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 103.
    Ray v. United States.

      James D. Sparks for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and
      Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 119.
    Ti Ti Peat Humus Co., Inc. v. Wirtz, Secretary of Labor.

      Huger Sinkler for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Charles Donahue, Bessie Margolin and Robert E. Nagle for respondent.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 120.
    Edwards, Executor v. Phillips, District Director of Internal Revenue.

      Barnabas F. Sears for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Rogo-vin and Jeanine Jacobs for respondent.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 124.
    Estate of Berry et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

      Charles D. Savage, Thomas A. Roach and Robert D. Larsen for petitioners.

      Solicitor General Marshall and Assistant Attorney General Rogovin for respondent.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 126.
    Murray et ux. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

      Scott P. Crampton, Stanley Worth and Joseph A. Mc-Menamin for petitioners.

      Solicitor General Marshall and Assistant Attorney General Rogovin for respondent.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 133.
    Kolod et al. v. United States.

      Edward Bennett Williams, Harold Ungar and W. H. Erickson for petitioners.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Sidney M. Glazer for the United States.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 134.
    Phillips v. United States.

      R. Eugene Pincham, Charles B. Evins, Earl E. Strayhorn and Sam Adam for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General

      Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 135.
    No. 223.
    Jones v. United States; and Mittelman v. United States.

      Herbert Monte Levy for petitioner in No. 135.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Philip R. Monahan for the United States in both eases.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Reported below: 374 F. 2d 414.


text:
    No. 138.
    Blane v. United States.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 151.
    Zwick et al. v. Freeman, Secretary of Agriculture, et al.

      Arthur Slavin for petitioners.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Acting Assistant Attorney General Eardley, Morton Hollander and Harvey L. Zuckman for respondents.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 156.
    Akins v. United States.

      W. S. Moore for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Marshall Tamor Golding for the United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 159.
    B & L Farms Co. et al. v. United States.

      William Gresham Ward for petitioners.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Rogovin and Crombie J. D. Garrett for the United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 160.
    D. R. Smalley & Sons, Inc. v. United States.

      Donald A. Moon for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Acting Assistant Attorney General Eardley and Morton Hollander for the United States.
   Ct. Cl. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 165.
    Krol v. United States.

      George F. Callaghan and Julius

      Lucius Echeles for petitioner.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.


text:
    No. 166.
    Kapatos v. United States.

      Frank A. Lopes for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. Maysack for the United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 167.
    Scherer & Sons, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board.

      Joseph A. Perkins for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli and Norton J. Come for respondent.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 171.
    Murphy et al. v. United States.

      Moses L. Kove for petitioners.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Julia P. Cooper for the United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 173.
    No. 192.
    Roberts et al. v. United States; and United States v. Sandra & Dennis Fishing Corp. et al.

      Harry Kisloff for petitioners in No. 173.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Acting Assistant Attorney General Eard-ley, Morton Hollander and Richard S. Salzman for the United States in both cases.

      Robert J. Hallisey for Sandra & Dennis Fishing Corp. (P & I Insurer), and Mr. Kisloff for individual respondents in No. 192.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.

Reported below: 372 F. 2d 189.


text:
    No. 183.
    Roy v. United States.

      Burton Marks for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Rogo-vin, Joseph M. Howard and Richard B. Buhrman for the United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 188.
    Pan Cargo Shipping Corp. v. United States.

      Nicholas J.

      Healy for petitioner.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Solicitor General Marshall, Acting Assistant Attorney General Eardley and Morton Hollander for the United States.


text:
    No. 194.
    No. 212.
    Local Union No. 12, United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic Workers of America, AFL-CIO v. National Labor Relations Board et al.; and Local 1367, International Longshoremen's Association, AFL-CIO, et al. v. National Labor Relations Board.

      Clarence F. Rhea for petitioner in No. 194.

      Warner F. Brock and Arthur Mandell for petitioners in No. 212.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli and Norton J. Come for the National Labor Relations Board in both cases, and Robert L. Carter and Barbara A. Morris for respondents Business League of Gadsden et al., in No. 194.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Reported below: No. 194, 368 F. 2d 12; No. 212, 368 F. 2d 1010.


text:
    No. 195.
    Birnbaum v. United States.

      Ben Herzberg and David W. Peck for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Mervyn Hamburg for the United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 198.
    Lewis v. United States.

      Thaddeus D. Williams for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Marshall Tamor Golding for the United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 200.
    Blue Cab Co. et al. v. National Labor Relations Board.

      Charles L. Buey and Paul Levenfeld for petitioners.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli and Norton J. Come for respondent.

      Sheldon M. Charone for Local 782, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America, intervenor below.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 202.
    DiMichele v. United States.

      Lester J. Schaffer for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. Maysack for the United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 203.
    Ayotte v. United States.

      Gerald M. Franklin for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 208.
    Lipsitz v. Perez, Commanding General, Fort Jackson.

      Theodore W. Law, Jr., for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for respondent.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 209.
    Union Petroleum Corp. v. United States.

      Hugh Q. Buck for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Ronald L. Gainer for the United States.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 215.
    Overnite Transportation Co. v. National Labor Relations Board et al.

      White ford S. Blakeney for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli and Norton J. Come for National Labor Relations Board, and David Previant and Hugh J. Beins for Chauffeurs, Teamsters & Helpers Local 171, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America, respondents.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 217.
    Schafitz v. Federal Communications Commission.

      Carl

      L. Shipley for petitioner.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.

Solicitor General Marshall and Henry Getter for respondent.


text:
    No. 234.
    Continental Oil Co. v. Udall, Secretary of the Interior, et al.

      Samuel W. McIntosh and A. T. Smith for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Weisl, Roger P. Marquis and S. Billingsley Hill for Udall, and Henry P. Sailer for Phillips Petroleum Co. et al., respondents.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certio-rari denied.


text:
    No. 241.
    Sarkes Tarzian, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board.

      Joseph Alton Jenkins for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli and Norton J. Gome for respondent.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 242.
    Utica Mutual Insurance Co. v. Vincent, Regional Director, National Labor Relations Board.

      Charles J. Barnhill for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli and Norton J. Come for respondent.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 253.
    McCowan v. United States.

      Russell E. Parsons for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 254.
    Kaplan et al. v. United States.

      Maurice C. Inman, Jr., and Arthur L. Martin for petitioners.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. Maysack for the United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 255.
    United States v. U. S. Thermo Control Co. et al.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Rogovin and Philip R. Miller for the United States.

      Daniel M. Gribbon and
      William H. Allen for respondents.
   Ct. Cl. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 250.
    Remler Co. v. United States.

      Manuel Auerbach and Michael Leo Looney for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.
   Ct. Cl. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 256.
    No. 282.
    No. 301.
    Caddo Parish School Board et al. v. United States et al.; East Baton Rouge Parish School Board et al. v. Davis et al.; and Board of Education of the City of Bessemer et al. v. United States et al.

      Jack P. F. Gremillion, Attorney General of Louisiana, William P. Schuler, Second Assistant Attorney General, and Albín P. Lassiter for petitioners in No. 256.

      John F. Ward, Jr., for petitioners in No. 282. Reid B. Barnes, William G. Somerville, Jr., and John C. Satterfield for petitioners in No. 301.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Doar, Louis F. Claiborne and David L. Norman for the United States in Nos. 256 and 301.

      Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III, Michael Meltsner, Norman C. Amaker, Charles H. Jones, Jr., Demetrius C. Newton, A. P. Tureaud, Oscar W. Adams, Jr., Orzell Billingsley, Jr., David H. Hood and Johnnie A. Jones for individual respondents in all three cases.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Reported below: 372 F. 2d 836, 949, 380 F. 2d 385.


text:
    No. 270.
    Furr's, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board.

      William L. Kerr for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli and Norton J. Come for respondent.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 263.
    Florence Printing Co. v. National Labor Relations Board et al.

      D. Laurence McIntosh for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli
      and Norton J. Come for National Labor Relations Board, and Gerhard P. Van Arkel and George Kaujmann for Charleston Typographical Union No. 43, respondents.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 265.
    Charles Town, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

      George T. Altman for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Rogovin, Gilbert E. Andrews and Albert J. Beveridge III for respondent.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 269.
    Solite Corp. v. United States.

      T. Howard Spainhour for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Rogovin, Grant W. Wiprud and Thomas L. Stapleton for the United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 274.
    K. B. & J. Young’s Super Markets, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board.

      Ralston Lercara Courtney for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli and Norton J. Come for respondent.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 292.
    Reinach v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

      Jerome Kamerman for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Rogovin, Harry Baum and Elmer J. Kelsey for respondent.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 297.
    Smith v. United States.

      P. Walter Jones for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 299.
    Borden Cabinet Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board.

      Arthur C. Nordhoff for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli and Nor

      ton J. Come for respondent.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 278.
    No. 279.
    J. Gordon Turnbull, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue; and Turnbull, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

      Wentworth T. Durant for petitioners in each case.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Rogo-vin and Crombie J. D. Garrett for respondent in both cases.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Reported below: No. 278, 373 F. 2d 87; No. 279, 373 F. 2d 91.


text:
    No. 300.
    Pollock v. United States.

      Robert Kasanof for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 303.
    Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co. et al. v. Federal Power Commission.

      Walter E. Beckjord for petitioners.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Richard A. Solomon, Peter H. Schiff, Drexel D. Journey and Israel Convisser for respondent.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 307.
    Perry Publications, Inc., et al. v. National Labor Relations Board.

      Harrison C. Thompson, Jr., for petitioners.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Matnoli, Norton J. Come and Nancy M. Sherman for respondent.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 311.
    Perma-Home Corp. et al. v. United States.

      Paul T. Smith for petitioners.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. May sack for the United States.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 318.
    Hill v. United States.

      Paul Gordon for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vimson,

      Beatrice Rosenberg and Julia P. Cooper for the United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 315.
    Snyder v. Turley, Warden.

      Louis Lipschitz for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for respondent.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 320.
    Serman et al. v. United States.

      Dan W. Duffy for petitioners.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Ronald L. Gainer for the United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 321.
    Ogle Protection Service, Inc., et al. v. National Labor Relations Board.

      David E. Burgess for petitioners.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. M,anoli and Norton J. Come for respondent.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 343.
    Maltby v. United States.

      Robert Vogel for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.
   Ct. Cl. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 349.
    Hoffman v. United States.

      Thomas H. King for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.
   Ct. Cl. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 350.
    Local Union No. 742, United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America v. National Labor Relations Board.

      Bernard M. Mamet for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, Norton J. Come and Nancy M. Sherman for respondent.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 352.
    District Lodge No. 15, International Association of Machinists, AFL-CIO, et al. v. National Labor Relations Board.

      Stephen C. Vladeck and Judith P. Vladeck
      for petitioners.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Solicitor General Marshall, Arnold Ord-man, Dominick L. Manoli and Norton J. Come for respondent.


text:
    No. 354.
    Imhoff v. United States.

      John I. Heise, Jr., for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.
   Ct. Cl. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 356.
    Provenzano v. United States.

      Joseph F. Walsh for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Kirby W. Patterson for the United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 358.
    Intravaia et al. v. Wirtz, Secretary of Labor.

      Solicitor General Marshall for respondent.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 359.
    Eastman v. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare.

      Bernard I. Rosen for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Marshall for respondent.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 361.
    Lionberger, dba Lionberger’s Auto Parts v. United States.

      William T. Stephens and Grant R. Sykes for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Marshall and Assistant Attorney General Rogovin for the United States.
   Ct. Cl. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 365.
    Moore v. United States.

      Charles E. Gray for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 396.
    California Citizens Band Association, Inc. v. United States et al.

      Clifton Hildebrand for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner,

      Henry Geller and John H. Conlin for the United States et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 376.
    Fisher v. United States.

      Fred Elledge, Jr., for petitioner.

      Solicitor' General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Julia P. Cooper for the United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 379.
    Sosa v. United States.

      Sam Adam for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Mervyn Hamburg for the United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 389.
    Tynan et al. v. United States.

      Myron G. Ehrlich for Tynan, and Charles B. Murray for Hanrahan et al., petitioners.

      Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 390.
    Mass v. Brenner, Commissioner of Patents.

      Robert J. Patch for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Marshall for respondent.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 407.
    Krakover, Trustee v. United States.

      Fred M. Winner and Warren 0. Martin for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 412.
    Rundle v. Udall, Secretary of the Interior.
    Moses Davis for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Marshall for respondent.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 470.
    Board of Managers of the Arkansas Training School for Boys et al. v. George et al.

      Joe Purcell, Attorney General of Arkansas, R. D. Smith III, Assistant Attorney General, and Jack L. Lessenberry, Special Assistant Attorney General, for petitioners.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 411.
    Amino Brothers Co., Inc. v. United States.

      John A. Bier smith for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.
   Ct. Cl. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 423.
    Nightingale et al. v. United States.

      Vincent M. Casey for petitioners.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. May sack for the United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 425.
    Mattia v. United States.

      Frederick B. Lacey for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Mervyn Hamburg for the United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 447.
    International Longshoremen’s & Warehousemen’s Union, Local 12 v. National Labor Relations Board.

      Norman Leonard for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli and Norton J. Come for respondent.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 453.
    Grimes v. United States.

      Charles W. Tessmer for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Philip R. Monahan for the United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 110.
    Worrell v. Matters et al.

      William P. Thom, Marvin Karpatkin and Leo Pfeffer for petitioner.

      William C. Sennett, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, John P. McCord,
      Deputy Attorney General, and Edward Friedman for respondent the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; David Berger for respondent the School District of Philadelphia, and William B. Ball for respondents Grubb et al.
   Sup. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 129.
    AMP Inc. v. General Motors, Inc.

      William J. Keating and Truman S. Safford for petitioner.

      Warren E. Finken and George E. Frost for respondent.
   C. C. P. A. Certiorari denied.