text:
    No. 5458.
    Chipley v. Roberts et al.
   Sup. Ct. S. C. Certiorari denied.


source: Caselaw Access Project

license: Public Domain

text:
    No. 5467.
    Anderson v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5513.
    Bridges v. United States.
   C. A. 9th. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5547.
    Holmes v. California.
   Ct. App. Cal., 3d App. Dist. Certiorari denied^


text:
    No. 5549.
    Allen v. Perini, Correctional Superintendent.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5551.
    Cortez v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5554.
    Bunker v. Nelson, Warden.
   C; A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5566.
    Young v. Zelker, Warden.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5567.
    Jones v. Maryland.
   Ct. Sp. App. Md. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5571.
    Capitoli v. Wainwright, Corrections Director.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5578.
    Daniel v. Richardson, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5581.
    Pepitone v. California et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5582.
    Sposato v. United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5583.
    Harold v. United States.
   C. A. 5th- Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5584.
    Marshall v. United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5588.
    Falange v. United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5590.
    Campbell v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5592.
    Zucker v. Field, Men’s Colony Superintendent.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5593.
    Williams v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5595.
    Smith v. United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5596.
    Robinson v. California.
   Ct. App. Cal., 5th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5597.
    Hartley et al. v. Hartley, Executrix.
   App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 1st Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5598.
    White v. Perini, Correctional Superintendent.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5599.
    Francis v. California.
   Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5601.
    Overman v. North Carolina.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5603.
    Searles v. Minnesota.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5605.
    Lamia v. United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5606.
    Levin v. Probation Department of the City of New York.
   C. A. 2d Cir. . Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5607.
    Smith v. Richardson, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5608.
    Krepel v. California.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5609.
    Alexander v. Attorney General of California et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5612.
    Carson v. Richardson, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5613.
    Phipps v. Follette, Warden.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5614.
    Feeley v. Craven, Warden.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5619.
    Hammond v. Maryland.
   Ct. Sp. App. Md. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5620.
    Adams v. Michigan.
   Sup. Ct. Mich. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5621.
    Park v. California Adult Authority et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5622.
    Felder v. United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5623.
    Pilapil v. Immigration and Naturalization Service.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5624.
    Rollins v. California.
   Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5625.
    Chafa v. Moseley, Warden.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5626.
    Chute v. California.
   Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5628.
    Hamm v. Massachusetts.
   Sup. Jud. Ct. Mass. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5629.
    Rucker v. Neil, Warden.
   C. Á. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5631.
    Stebbins v. Allstate Insurance Companies et. al.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5632.
    Fletcher v. Maxwell et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5635.
    Collis et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5636.
    Marshall v. United States.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5637.
    Ruelaz v. Nelson, Warden.
   C. A. 9th Cir. . Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5640.
    Williams v. United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5641.
    Christian v. United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5642.
    Wilson v. Brayer.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5643.
    Hicks v. Cox, Penitentiary Superintendent.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5644.
    Santiago v. Charge Account Credit Corp.
   App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 1st Jud. Dept. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5646.
    Jones v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5650.
    Williams v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5649.
    Davidson v. United States.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5653.
    Dockery v. California.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5654.
    Pitts v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5655.
    Kreager v. Industrial Commissioner of New York.
   App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 3d Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5656.
    Watkins v. United States et al.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5657.
    Beedle v. California.
   Ct. App. Cal., 4th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5658.
    Thogmartin v. United States.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5659.
    McCloud v. United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5660.
    Parker v. United States.
   C. A. 9th.Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 332.
    Wilhite v. City of Monroe.
   Sup. Ct. La. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 555.
    Bigman v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 5251.
    Jackson v. International Harvester Co.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr.'Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.'


text:
    No. 5258.
    Ross v. New York.
   App.- Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 4th Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be • granted.


text:
    No. 5580.
    Thurman v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 5627.
    Uptgraft et al. v . California.
   App. Dept., Super. Ct. Cal., County of Los Angeles. Certi-orari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 432.
    No. 454.
    United Order of American Bricklayers & Stone Masons, Local 21 v. Waters et al.; and International Harvester Co. v. Waters et al.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Motion to dispense with printing respondents’ brief granted. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 427 F. 2d 476.


text:
    No. 520.
    No. 521.
    Cimini v. United States; and O’Malley v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. . Certiorari denied..

Mr. Justice Brennan and Mr. Justice White are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.

Reported below: 427 F. 2d 129.


text:
    No. 553.
    Martin, dba Silko New Improved Products Co., v. Crown Zellerbach Corp.
   C. C. P. A. Motion for leave to supplement petition granted. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 346.
    Beto, Corrections Director v. Galloway.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5321.
    Howard v. Sigler, Warden.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Blackmun took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 5377.
    Kamsler v. Bellows, Bellows & Magidson.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Motion to strike brief for respondent and certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5610.
    Hill v. United States.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 2053,
    Misc., October Term, 1969.
    Bowman v. United States,
   398 U. S. 967. Motion for leave to file petition for rehearing denied.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.


text:
    November 13, 1970
    No. 87.
    No. 812.
    United States v. District Court in and for the County of Eagle et al.; and United States v. District Court in and for Water Division No. 5 et al.
   Sup. Ct. Colo. Application of the Solicitor General, consented to by all parties concerned, for stay of Colorado state court proceedings before the District Court in and for Water Division No. 5, presented to Mr. Justice White, and by him referred to the Court, granted insofar as such proceedings involve an adjudication of the rights of the' United States, pending decision of this Court in No. 87 [certiorari granted, 397 U. S. 1005] and in No. 812 presently pending on petition for writ of certiorari.


text:
    No. —.
    Ferrell v. Selective Service Local Board No. 38 of Walnut Ridge, Arkansas, et al.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Application for stay of induction and recall of mandate of. the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, presented to Mr. Justice Douglas, and by him referred to the Court, denied.


text:
    November 16, 1970
    No. 5676.
    Macias et al. v. Richardson, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare, et al.
   Affirmed on appeal from D. C. N. D. Cal.


text:
    No. 584.
    Pye v. State Highway Department of Georgia et al.
   Appeal from- Sup. Ct. Ga. dismissed for want of. jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 592.
    Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc. v. Franchise Tax Board of California.
   Appeal from Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist., dismissed for want of substantial federal question.


text:
    No. 336.
    Nelson, Warden v. O’Neil.
   C. A. 9th Cir. [Cértiorari granted, ante, p. 9Ó1.] Application of respondent for release on personal recognizance and separate petition for writ of habeas corpus, presented to Mr. Justice Douglas, and by him referred to the Court, denied.


text:
    No. 35,
    Orig.
    United States v. Maine et al.
    [For earlier orders herein, see, e. g., 398 U. S. 947.]
   Motion of State of Florida for severance referred to Special Master.

Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.


text:
    No. 28.
    Sanks et al. v. Georgia et al.
   Appeal from Sup. Ct. Ga. [Probable jurisdiction noted, 395 U. S. 974; restored to calendar] 399 U. S. 922.] Further consideration of appellees’ suggestion of mootness postponed to hearing of case on the merits.


text:
    No. 89.
    Lemon et al. v. Kurtzman, Superintendent of Public Instruction of Pennsylvania, et al.
   Appeal from D. C. E. D. Pa. [Probable jurisdiction noted, 397 U. S. 1034]; and


text:
    No. 153.
    Tilton et al. v. Richardson, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare, et al.
   Appeal from D. C. Conn. [Probable jurisdiction noted, sub nom. Tilton v. Finch, 399 U. S. 904.] Motion of National Jewish Commission on Law & Public Affairs et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted.


text:
    No. 128.
    In re Burrus et al.
   Sup. Ct. N. C. [Cer-tiorari granted, 397. U. S. 1036.] Motion for leave for two attorneys to participate in oral argument on behalf of respondent, State of North Carolina, granted.


text:
    No. 154.
    No. 226.
    James et al. v. Valtierra et al.; and Shaffer v. Valtierra et al.
   Appeals from D. C. N. D. Cal. [Probable jurisdiction noted, No. 154, 398 U. S. 949, No. 226, 399 U. S. 925.] Motions of American Jewish Congress et al., NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc., et al., and National Urban Coalition et al. for leave to file briefs as amici curiae denied.

Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Brennan are of the opinion that the motions should be granted. Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the considbration or decision of these motions.


text:
    No. 360.
    Grove Press, Inc., et al. v. Flask et al.
   Appeal from D. C. N. D. Ohio. Motion of Eve Productions, Inc., for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted.

Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.


text:
    No. 5394.
    Grizzell v. Wainwright, Corrections Director.
   Motion for leave to file petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that the motion should be granted.


text:
    No. 590.
    No. 5271.
    No. 5506.
    No. 5647.
    Muncaster v. DeMent, U. S. Attorney, et al.; Fletcher v. Rosenberg, U. S. District Judge; Wiley v. Brown, Chief Judge, U. S. Court of Appeals; and Kamsler v. Kerner, U. S. District Judge, et al.
   Motions for leave to file petitions for writs of mandamus denied.


text:
    No. 515.
    United States v. Southern Ute Tribe or Band of Indians.
   Ct. Cl. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 600.
    Perez v. United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 587.
    Luttrell v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 591.
    Leprino Cheese Co., dba Leprino Cheese Manufacturing Co. v. National Labor Relations Board.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 589.
    Port Construction Co. v. Virgin Islands Housing Authority.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 594.
    Rastelli v. New York.
   App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 2d Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 595.
    Grimaldi v. New York.
   App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 2d Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 597.
    Bada Co. v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc., et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 598.
    Sexton v. Jackson Ready-Mix Concrete.
   Sup. Ct. Miss. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 599.
    Luckenbach Overseas Corp. v. Compton.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 605.
    Green v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 607.
    Davis v. Maryland.
   Ct. Sp. App. Md. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 608.
    Baum v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 613.
    Sever-Williams Co., Inc., et al. v. Board of Education of Chillicothe City School District.
   Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied:


text:
    No. 616.
    Steinbrecher v. United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. .


text:
    No. 879.
    Beauchamp et al. v. City of Oklahoma City et al.
   Sup. Ct. Okla. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5162.
    Cockrell v. Florida.
   Sup. Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5166.
    Williams v. Maryland.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5190.
    Fox et ux. v. Lennon.
   App. Dept., Super. Ct. Cal., County of Los Angeles. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5224.
    Denmark v. LaVallee, Warden.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5246.
    Ritchie v. Wisconsin.
   Sup. Ct. Wis. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5290.
    Smith v. Anderson et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5305.
    Henry v. Perini, Correctional Superintendent.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5361.
    LeDent v. Nebraska.
   Sup. Ct. Neb. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5373.
    Diddlemeyer v. Mississippi.
   Sup. Ct. Miss. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5385.
    Ward v. Page, Warden.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Cértiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5399.
    Crooks v. Indiana.
   Sup. Ct. Ind. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5501.
    Blake v. New York.
   Ct. App. N. Y.. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5630.
    Arzonica v. Cassidy et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5661.
    Martin v. Wainwright, Corrections Director.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied..


text:
    No. 5662.
    Hendricks v. Ohio.
   Sup. Ct. Ohio. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5668.
    Winbush v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5670.
    Thompson v. United States.
   Ct. Cl.' Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5672.
    Carr v. Simpson, Warden.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5673.
    Louie v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5677.
    Yee v. California.
   Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5679.
    Nearis, Trustee v. City of Gloucester et al.
   Sup. Jud. Ct. Mass. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5680.
    Gilhart v. United States.
   Ct. Cl. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5683.
    Smith v. Michigan.
   Sup. Ct. Mich. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5684.
    Baity v. Texas.
   Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5685.
    Battaglia v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5686.
    Hurd v. Hurd.
   Sup. Jud. Ct. Mass. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5688.
    King v. New Jersey.
   Super. Ct. N. J. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5689.
    Washington v. United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5690.
    Kirby v. Beto, Corrections Director.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5691.
    Jackson v. Perini, Correctional Superintendent.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 262.
    Crichton v. McGehee et al.
   Ct. App. La., 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 493.
    Collins v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 5499.
    Strader v. North Carolina.
   Ct. App. N. C. Certiorari denied.

Mr. . Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 586.
    Pennsylvania v. Whiting.
   Sup. Ct. Pa. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 596.
    Feldstein v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Harlan are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 5633.
    Dargan v. New York.
   Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 5663.
    Nazario v. New York.
   App. Term, Sup. Ct. N. Y., 1st Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 5671.
    Cantrell v. United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Blackmun took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Rehearing Denied


text:
    No. 319.
    No. 477.
    No. 5148.
    No. 5213.
    No. 5244.
    No. 5282.
    No. 5322.
    No. 5494.
    Mogulnicki v. Connecticut, RKO General, Inc. v. Newmark, Braswell v. Florida, Lambright v. Craven, Warden, Alers v. Municipality of San Juan et al., Dvorsky v. United States, Gill v. United States, Kamsler v. Hoffman, U. S. District Judge,
   ante, p. 826;

ante, p. 854;

ante, p. 873;

ante, p. 837;

ante, p. 839;

ante, p. 840;

ante, p. 851; and

ante, p. 817. Petitions for rehearing denied.


text:
    No. 5354.
    Ruderer v. Johnson et al.,
   ante, p. 860. Petition for rehearing denied.

Mr. Justice Blackmun took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    November 19, 1970
    No. 890.
    Adkins v. United States District Court for the Central District of California et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Petition for writ of certiorari dismissed pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of this Court.


text:
    November 20, 1970
    No. —.
    Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc., et al. v. Volpe, Secretary, Department of Transportation, et al.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Application for stay presented to Mr. Justice Stewart, and by him referred to the Court, set for argument on Monday, December 7. Typewritten briefs shall be filed by Thursday, December 3.


text:
    November 23, 1970
    No. 631.
    Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. United States et al.
   Affirmed on appeal from D. C. Colo.


text:
    No. 626.
    Sterrett, Administrator, Department of Public Welfare of Indiana, et al. v. Grubb et al.
   Motion of appellee Grubb for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Affirmed on appeal from D. C. N. D. Ind.

Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Harlan dissent. They are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.


text:
    No. 5697.
    Herring v. R. L. Mathis Certified Dairy Co. et al.
   Appeal from Sup. Ct. Ga. dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


text:
    No. 5724.
    Porter et al. v. New York.
   Appeal from App. Term, Sup. Ct. N. Y., 1st Jud. Dept., dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 508.
    California v. Pinkus.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted and judgment affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 5398.
    Hemphill v. Moynahan.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and certiorari granted. Judgment vacated and case remanded to United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for further consideration in light of Price v. Georgia, 398 U. S. 323.


text:
    No. 1385,
    October Term, 1969.
    Hutcherson et al. v. Lehtin et al.,
   399 U. S. 522. Petition for rehearing granted and order of June 29, 1970, vacated. Judgment recalled and a new judgment entered vacating the judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California ana case remanded to that court so that it may enter a fresh order dismissing the complaint, thus affording appellants an opportunity to take a timely appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.


text:
    No. 256.
    First Mercantile Consumer Discount Co. v. Stefanelli et al.
   Treating the petition for rehearing as a motion to amend the order of this Court dated October 12, 1970 [ante, p. 808], motion granted. Order amended to read, “The appeal is dismissed for want of a final judgment.”


text:
    No. 30.
    United States v. Harris.
   C. A. 6th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 397 U. S. 905.] Motion of Americans for Effective Law Enforcement, Inc., for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted.


text:
    No. 40,
    Orig.
    Pennsylvania v. New York et al.
   [Motion to file complaint granted, 398 U. S. 956.] Motion of State of California for leave to intervene as a party plaintiff referred to Special Master for his recommendation.


text:
    No. 43.
    Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, et al. v. Lazarus.
   Appeal from D. C. S. D. Fla. Motion of Stephen Hillardt and Timothy Green for leave to proceed in jornia pau-peris granted and motions for leave to intervene as parties appellee and to expedite appeal denied.


text:
    No. 59.
    No. 61.
    National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. v. Securities and Exchange Commission et al. Investment Company Institute et al. v. Camp, Comptroller of the Currency, et al.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. . [Certiorari granted, 397 U. S. 986]; and

C. A. D. C. Cir. [Certiorari granted, 397 U. S. 986.] Motion to reverse sequence of oral argument or alternative request that cases be consolidated denied. The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.


text:
    No. 83.
    Byrne, District Attorney of Suffolk County, et al. v. Karalexis et al.
   Appeal from D. C. Mass. [Restored to calendar, 399 U. S. 922.] Motion of appellees for leave to file supplemental memorandum, after, argument, granted.

Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.


text:
    No. 206.
    Harris v. New York.
   Ct. App. N. Y. [Certiorari granted, 398 U. S. 937.] Motion of Frank S. Hogan for leave to participate in oral: argument as amicus curiae granted; counsellor respondent will cede 15 minutes of his time for that purpose.


text:
    No. 507.
    California Department of Human Resources Development et al. v. Java et al.
   Appeal from D. C. N. D. Cal. [Probable jurisdiction noted, ante, p. 877.] Motion of Southern California Edison Co. et al. for leave to intervene as parties appellant denied without prejudice to filing of brief as amici curiae with consents of the parties, or a motion for leave ■ to file a brief as amici curiae if'consents are not granted.


text:
    No. 246.
    Muir v. Florida.
   Dist. Ct. APP- Fla., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 377.
    Perati v. Superior Court of California, County of Alameda.
   Ct. App. Cal., 1st A.pp. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 567.
    No. 574.
    No. 576.
    No. 719.
    Garber v. United States; Florea v. United States; Kaufman v. United States; and Burns v. United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 429 F; 2d 240.


text:
    No. 578.
    First National Realty Corp. v. Javins et al.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 617.
    Chemithon Corp. v. Procter & Gamble Co. et al.
   C.. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 619.
    Consumers Power Co. v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 618.
    International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 450, AFL-CIO v. Construction Employers’ Association of Texas et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied..


text:
    No. 622.
    Lynch, as Attorney General of California v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 623.
    Texaco Inc. v. Bealmer et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 625.
    Birmelin v. Boymer et ux.
   Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 3d Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 627.
    Thriftimart, Inc., dba Smart & Final Iris Co., et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certi-orari denied.


text:
    No. 628.
    Kazubowski v. Kazubowski.
   Sup. Ct. Ill. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 629.
    Gilday v. Scafati, Correctional Superintendent.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 634.
    Reynolds v. Galbreath et al.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 635.
    P. F. Collier & Son Corp. et al. v. Federal Trade Commission.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 637.
    Probst v. Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation et al.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certi-orari denied.


text:
    No. 642.
    Mengarelli v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 636.
    McCrea, Executrix, et al. v. Harris County Houston Ship Channel Navigation District et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 638.
    Moosman, Administratrix v. Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation et al.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari.denied.


text:
    No. 5205.
    Carpenter v. Missouri.
   Sup. Ct. Mo. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5207.
    Bauer v. California.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5312.
    Rhodes v. Texas.
   Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Certiorari-denied.


text:
    No. 5334.
    Carter v. Alabama.
   Ct. App. Ala. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5360.
    Walker v. Laxalt, Governor of Nevada.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5397.
    Shelhart v. Young, U. S. District Judge.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5429.
    Curtin v. Illinois.
   Sup.. Ct. Ill. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5696.
    Evans v. Craven, Warden.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied..


text:
    No. 5698.
    Turner v. United States.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5699.
    Phillips v. Maryland.
   Ct. Sp. App. Md. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5700.
    Porter v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5701.
    Ivy v. Richardson, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5702.
    Kizere v. New York.
   App. Term, Sup. Ct. N. Y., 1st Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5705.
    Adams v. Maryland.
   Ct. Sp. App. Md. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5706.
    Baskerville v. Deegan, Warden.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5709.
    Bowles v. United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5710.
    Shole v. Howard et al., Judges.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5715.
    Swan v. Young, Warden.
   Sup. Ct. Minn. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5718.
    Miller v. Yeager, Principal Keeper.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5719.
    Daniel v. Zelker, Warden.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5720.
    Rapp v. Sigler, Warden.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5726.
    Gonzales v. Beto, Corrections Director.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5723.
    Creighton, aka Evans v. Maryland.
   Ct. Sp. App. Md. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5728.
    Turner v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5729.
    Palmer v. Follette, Warden.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5730.
    Thompson et al. v. United States.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5733.
    Jewell v. City of Covington et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5734.
    Kaldenberg v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 601.
    Keriakos et al. v. Hunt et al.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.

The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Harlan, and Mr. Justice Blackmun, for the reasons expressed in their separate opinions in Cain v. Kentucky, 397 U. S. 319 (1970), Walker v. Ohio, 398 U. S. 434 (1970) (The Chief Justice) ; Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476, 496 (1957), Jacobellis v. Ohio, 378 U. S. 184, 203 (1964), Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U. S. 413, 455 (1966) (Mr. Justice Harlan); and Hoyt v. Minnesota, 399 U. S. 524 (1970) (Mr. Justice Blackmun), would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment below, and remand the case to the Court of Appeals for consideration of the other issues tendered by petitioners.

Mr. Justice Douglas took no part, in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 620.
    No. 639.
    No. 640.
    No. 5790.
    Hooper v. United States; Grooms v. United States; Hooper v. United States; and Whitlock v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 612.
    Scaggs v. Larsen et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 621.
    Indianapolis Newspapers, Inc. v. Fields.
   Sup. Ct. Ind. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 5365.
    Shak v. Hawaii.
   Sup. Ct. Hawaii. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 5366.
    Shak v. Hawaii.
   Sup. Ct. Hawaii. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 624.
    Clifford v. Beto, Corrections Director.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Motion to dispense with printing petition granted. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5727.
    Warner v. United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Blackmun took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 247.
    No. 305.
    St. Michael & Archangel Russian Orthodox Greek Catholic Church et al. v. Uhniat et al., Skega Aktiebolag, formerly Skelleftea Gummifabriks A.-B., et al. v. B. F. Goodrich Co.,
   ante, p. 823; and

ante, p. 825. Petitions for rehearing denied.


text:
    No. 341.
    No. 344.
    No. 367.
    No. 5200.
    No. 5202.
    No. 5211.
    No. 5379.
    Lakewood Manufacturing Co. v. Home Insurance Co. of New York et al., Kilarjian et al. v. United States, Lykes Bros. Steamship Co., Inc. v. Hess Shipping Corp. et al., Rice v. Schmidt, Warden, Jones v. Salisbury, Correctional Superintendent, Luster v. Cooksey, Williamson v. California,
   ante, p. 827;

ante, p. 827;

ante, p. 853;

ante, p. 836;

ante, p. 836;

ante, p. 854; and

ante, p. 844. Petitions for rehearing denied.


text:
    December 3, 1970
    No. —.
    Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc., et al. v. Volpe, Secretary of Transportation, et al.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to Wm. Bradford Reynolds to present oral argument, pro hac vice, granted.


text:
    No. —.
    Consolidation Coal Co. v. South-East Coal Co.
   Motion to postpone oral argument in No. 88, Ramsey v. United Mine Workers of America [certiorari granted, 397 U. S. 1006], denied.


text:
    December 7, 1970
    No. 897.
    Rockefeller, Governor of New York, et al. v. Catholic Medical Center of Brooklyn & Queens, Inc., Division of St. Mary's Hospital, et al.
   Appeal from C. A. 2d Cir. dismissed pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of this Court.


text:
    No. 5540.
    Taylor v. Illinois.
   Sup. Ct. Ill. Petition for certiorari dismissed pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of this Court.


author: Mr. Justice White,

text:
    No. 593.
    Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. et al. v. United States et al.
   Affirmed on appeal from D. C. S. D. Ohio.

Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Mr. Justice White,

dissenting.

The Court today affirms the District Court in a case involving the relationship of various factors in determining a “just and reasonable” charge under § 15 (7) of the Interstate Commerce Act. Because I think the court below was cléarly in error, I would reverse and remand the case to the Interstate Commerce Commission for further consideration.

The appellants, various railroads operating in the southern United States, submitted to the ICC in 1967 a tariff proposing a $22-per-car transit charge for cotton and molasses. The Commission, on protests from shippers, ordered appellants to refrain from imposing the new charge pending a hearing under § 15 (.7) to determine if the new charge was “just and reasonable.”

A hearing was held in 1968, and after receiving testimony from appellants and the protesting shippers, the Examiner concluded that (a) the appellants had the burden of proving the charge was just and reasonable by “clear and convincing” evidence, (b) the. $22 charge was not shown to approximate the actual costs involved in transiting a freight car, (c) the existing line-haul rates returned more than out-of-pocket costs for all services performed, including transit, and made a contribution to overhead as well, (d) the likely effect of the charge would be to divert traffic to motor carriers and thus reduce the railroads’ overall revenue. “All things considered,” the Examiner concluded, appellants had failed to show that the charge was just and reasonable. The Commission adopted the findings and conclusions of the Examiner without change. Transit Charges, Southern Territory, 332 I. C. C. 664 (1969).

On review, the three-judge District Court found that the Examiner and thus the Commission had misstated the law in holding that the carriers had the burden of showing the charge was just and reasonable by “clear and convincing evidence.” Had the court stopped there and simply remanded the proceedings to the Commission with directions to apply what the court deemed to be the proper standard of proof- there would be no need to review this case. However, the court went on to discuss the Commission’s findings on the merits. It concluded that the Commission had not justified its conclusions that (a), the $22 charge was not shown to approximate transit costs and (b) the line-haul rates were sufficient to cover the costs involved. The court then found that the Commission’s conclusion that the new charge would have diverted traffic to motor carriers was based on substantial evidence. On the basis of the last finding, the court upheld the ICC’s action and entered an order denying relief to appellants.

It has been settled law since the first Chenery case that “an administrative order cannot be upheld unless the grounds upon which.the agency acted in exercising its powers were those upon which its action can be sustained.” SEC v. Chenery Corp., 318 U. S. 80, 95 (1943). Thus, when the reviewing court here determined that the agéricy applied an erroneous standard of proof in its determination, it was barred from going on to consider whether the agency’s action was supported by substantial evidence. The court compounded the error by upsetting two of the agency’s findings as to reasonableness and upholding the agency solely on the basis of the third finding. The Examiner’s report, adopted by the Commission, explicitly states that the conclusion was based on “[a] 11 things considered,” not merely the finding of diversion. Finally, the applicable statute provides:

“In the exercise of its power to prescribe just and reasonable rates the Commission shall give due consideration, among other factors, to the effect of rates on the movement of traffic by the carrier or carriers for which the rates ¿re prescribed . ...”

It is apparent from a reading of the statute that the likelihood of diversion cannot be an independent ground if the court determines, as it took upon itself to determine here, that the other factors involved do not support the Commission’s conclusion as to reasonableness. . Thus, the court was in error not only in reviewing the evidence after it determined the standard to be erroneous, but also was in error in two respects when it did evaluate the evidence.

It may well be that, had the Commission acted in light of the District Court’s findings., as - to the standard of proof, it would have found that the proposed charge was just and reasonable. We cannot assume, any more than the District Court could properly assume, that the ' finding of an unreasonable charge would have the support of substantial evidence. As the Court said in Chenery, supra,

“The Commission’s action cannot be upheld merely because findings might have been made and considerations disclosed which would justify its order, as an appropriate safeguard for the interests protected by the Act. There must be such a responsible finding. There is no such finding here.” 318 U. S., at 94 (citation omitted).

By affirming the District Court, this Court gives its tacit approval to a procedure that is not in accord with accepted procedures of judicial review of agency actions. I would reverse the judgment of the District Court and remand the proceedings to the ICC.

       “At any hearing involving a change in a . . . charge, . . . the burden of proof shall be upon the carrier to show that the proposed changed . . . charge ... is just and reasonable . . . .” 49 U. S. C. §15 (7).

       “Transit” consists of stopping a freight car en route to its ultimate destination for proeessiiig of its contents. There is no, separate charge for transiting cotton at most points in the South, of for transiting molasses at Jacksonville, Florida, and in the instant proceedings the appellants sought to impose the separate charge on such commodities at these points. The original proposal included grain and grain products, but the appellants did not contest the Examiner’s decision regarding charges on those items before the full- Commission.

       Convened pursuant to 28 U. S. C. § 1336.

       49 U. S. C. § 15a (2) (emphasis added).


text:
    No. 778.
    Various Articles of "Obscene" Merchandise (Cherry, Claimant) v. United States et al.
   Appeal from D. C. S. D. N. Y. dismissed.


text:
    No. 5753.
    Wadlington v. Mindes et al.
   Appeal from Sup. Ct. Ill. dismissed for want of substantial federal question.

Mr. Justice Douglas, Mr. Justice White, and Mr. Justice Brennan are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.


author: Mr. Justice Douglas,

text:
    No. 524.
    Stanley et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Petition for writ of certiorari granted, insofar as it seeks review of affirmance by the Court of Appeals of count 5 .(possession count) of convictions of petitioners Stanley, Thomas, and Massey. Judgment. as to these three individuals vacated insofar as that count is concerned and case remanded to the Court of Appeals so. that it may consider suggestions contained in the memorandum the Solicitor General filed here. By this remand this Court intimates no view as to merits of the Solicitor General’s position. In all other respects the petition for writ of certiorari is denied.

Mr. Justice White and Mr. Justice Blackmun dissent and would deny certiorari.

Mr. Justice Douglas,

dissenting.

The statute at the time of conviction made manufacture a crime, 21 U. S. C. § 360a (a) (1964 ed., Supp. I). It also made “possession” a crime in the following words — “No person . .. . shall possess any depressant or stimulant, drug otherwise than' (1) for the personal use of himself or of a member, of his household; or (2) for administration to an animal owned by him' or a member of . his household.” 21 U. S. C. §360a(c) (1964 ed., Supp. I).

As stated by the Court of Appeals, the law, which was enacted in 1965, did not make possession for personal use a crime but it did make possession for sale an offense; and here the evidence is clear that possession was for sale.

Beginning in November 1966 government agents commenced an investigation into suspected' illegal drug activities in the San Francisco Bay area. Petitioners and others were placed under extensive surveillance. During’ the period of surveillance one Krusko, a government undercover agent, became. acquainted with petitioner Spires, twice purchased LSD from him (once for $3,400), and had frequent conversations .with him. These conversations revealed that petitioner Stanley was engaged in manufacturing .and distributing various drugs including LSD. A frequent topic of these conversations pertained to the purchase of LSD.

On November 15, 1967, during a -conversation, Spires-informed Krusko that “some of the boys” were going to set up a laboratory and had found a location “way out in the sticks.” Spires also informed him that of the 100 grams of LSD which Stanley had previously possessed, 10 had . been distributed in the form of tablets. Spires said that Stanley normally sold large quantities for $2,500 per gram.

On December 19 Spires stated he was going to the laboratory and. would attempt to get some LSD for Krusko, saying that Stanley intended to produce 25 grams of LSD before Christmas.

The officers thereupon obtained a search warrant of the premises which was executed on December 21. They found a small factory for the manufacture of LSD. All occupants of the house were arrested and the officers made a room-by-room search of the house. In all, 125 or 126 pieces of evidence were taken from the house.

A large brown bottle was found on a table in one room. On analysis its 472 grams of white powder were found to. be 5.3% LSD. On a shelf in a closet across from the bathroom was a plastic bottle containing 42 grams of 95% pure LSD. The 42 grams of 95% pure LSD at the-price quoted by Spires would bring in $105,000 and if sold in lesser quantities would bring in more.

The Government charged each, petitioner with manufacture of LSD, possession of LSD, and conspiracy to manufacture, compound, process, sell, and deliver LSD. Petitioner Spires was also charged with two counts of selling LSD. All petitioners were found guilty on each count charged against them. The District Judge did not make a specific finding that the possession of LSD was for the purposes of sale, but the Court of Appeals concluded that the evidence was overwhelming that the possession was for purposes of sale. 427 F. 2d 1066, 1071.

We distort the record when we treat the case as “possession” of a drug for .purposes of manufacture. We deal with a drug after it was manufactured and held for sale. The charge of “possession” made in the indictment was therefore “possession” as defined in the 1965 Act. The power to pardon is reserved for the Executive. Accordingly, I would deny certiorari and I dissent from a remand of the case.

       Amendments in 1968 made all possession criminal — possession for sale and “otherwise,” 82 Stat. 1361. While petitioners were tried after the enactment of the 1968 amendments, their offenses were, committed earlier. The 1968 amendments apply “only with respect to violations . . . committed after the date of the enactment of this Act.”


text:
    No. 656.
    Licata v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Upon consideration of suggestion of mootness and examination of entire record, petition for writ of certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States District Court for the Central District of California with directions to dismiss case as moot.

Mr. Justice Black is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted and case set for oral argument.


text:
    No. 485.
    Hawthorne v. Illinois,
   ante, p. 878. Application to stay effectiveness of order denying certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 1066.
    Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc., et al. v. Volpe, Secretary of Transportation, et al.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Application for stay presented to Mr. Justice Stewart, and by him referred to the Court, granted pending issuance of judgment of this Court. Treating the application for stay and briefs in opposition as a.petition for writ of certiorari and opposition thereto, certiorari granted and case set for oral argument on Monday, January 11, 1971. Briefs for petitioners shall be filed by December 21, 1970, and briefs for respondents shall be filed by January 4, 1971. Briefs may be typewritten if counsel are unable to- file printed briefs by these dates. Motions of Committee of 100 on the Federal City, Inc., and City of Memphis et al. for leave to file briefs as amici curiae granted.

Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of these matters.


text:
    No. —.
    San Antonio Conservation Society et al. v. Texas Highway Department et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Application for stay presented to Mr. Justice Black, and by him referred to the Court, granted provided petition for writ of certiorari, before judgment, is filed in this Court by December 14, 1970. Briefs opposing such petition shall be filed by December 17, 1970. Both the petition for writ of certiorari and briefs in opposition may be submitted in typewritten form.


text:
    No. 89.
    Lemon et al. v. Kurtzman, Superintendent of Public Instruction of Pennsylvania, et al.
   Appeal from D. C. E. D. Pa. [Probable jurisdiction noted, 397 U. S. 1034.] Motions of appellees schools and Pennsylvania Association of Independent Schools for additional time for oral argument denied.


text:
    No. 5247.
    Johnson v. United States.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 864.] Motion of petitioner for appointment of counsel granted. It is ordered that William J. Lippman, Esquire, of Washington, D. C., a member of the Bar of this Court, be, and he is hereby, appointed to serve as counsel for petitioner in this case. The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.


text:
    No. 673.
    Lee National Corp. v. Atlantic Richfield Co. et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Motion for leave to file petition for writ of certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5774.
    No. 5803.
    No. 5810.
    Sullivan v. Michigan; Copeland v. Wainwright, Corrections Director, et al.; and Fletcher v. Speaker, Attorney General of Pennsylvania.
   Motions for leave to file petitions for writs of habeas corpus denied.


text:
    No. 655.
    Hodgson, Secretary of Labor v. Local Union 6799, United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO, et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 812.
    United States v. District Court in and for Water Division No. 5 et al.
   Sup. Ct. Colo. Certiorari granted and case set for oral argument immediately following No. 87 [United States v. District Court in and for the County of Eagle et al., certiorari granted, 397 U. S. 1005].


text:
    No. 233.
    Mohland v. Montana State Board of Equalization et al.
   Sup. Ct. Mont. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 288.
    Joiner v. Deckard.
   Sup. Ct. Ill. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 291.
    McVean v. Florida.
   Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 2d. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 302.
    French et al. v. Bashful et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 470.
    Gianatasio v. Whyte et al.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 643.
    Alexander v. United States.
   Ct. Cl. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 644.
    Lansing Broadcasting Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 645.
    Strickland, Executrix v. E. W. Scripps Co. et al.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 646.
    Allied Theatre Owners of Indiana, Inc., dba Theatre Owners of Indiana, et al. v. Volpe, Secretary of Transportation.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 647.
    Larsen Ford, Inc. v. Gasperino, Administratrix, et al.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 649.
    Brown v. United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 653.
    Lewes Dairy, Inc., et al. v. Hardin, Secretary of Agriculture.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 650.
    Haynes v. James H. Carr, Inc.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 657.
    Hunt v. Missouri.
   Sup. Ct. Mo. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 659.
    Comcet, Inc. v. Communications Satellite Corp.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 662.
    C. H. Guenther & Son, Inc., dba Pioneer Flour Mills v. National Labor Relations Board.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 663.
    International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 480, AFL-CIO v. Gulf Coast Building & Supply Co., Inc.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 664.
    Cornwell et al. v. State Board of Education of Maryland et al.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 665.
    Scholder et al. v. United States et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 666.
    Rocket Freight Lines Co. v. National Labor Relations Board et al.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 667.
    Bowaters Southern Paper Corp. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 668.
    Farinella v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 670.
    American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc., et al. v. Safir et al.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 672.
    Tonahill v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 675.
    Commercial Solvents Corp. v. United States.
   Ct. Cl. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 687.
    Cohen v. Neagle et al.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 689.
    Fairbank, dba Arnold Fairbank Cattle Co., et al. v. Hardin, Secretary of Agriculture, et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 690.
    Thompson v. Virginia.
   Sup. Ct. App. Va. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 693.
    Braniff Airways, Inc., et al. v. Texas Aeronautics Commission et al.
   Sup. Ct. Tex. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 694.
    Clay v. Kentucky.
   Ct. App. Ky. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 696.
    Kuhns Brothers Co. et al. v. Duriron Co., Inc., et al.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 697.
    Uniflow Manufacturing Co. et al. v. King-Seeley Thermos Co.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 698.
    International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local No. 38, et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 699.
    Majuri et al. v. United States et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 700.
    Escambia Chemical Corp. v. Stamicarbon,
   N. V. C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 702.
    Murphy v. Oregon.
   Ct. App. Ore. Certiorari depied.


text:
    No. 5218.
    Ortega v. Florida.
   Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 4th Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5226.
    Jones v. Procunier, Corrections Director.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5309.
    Ortega v. California.
   Ct. App. Cal., 3d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5326.
    Washington v. New York.
   App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 4th Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5344.
    Cook v. Beto, Corrections Director.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5349.
    Gentile v. New York et al.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5406.
    Hill v. Burke, Warden.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5409.
    Jackson v. Illinois.
   Sup. Ct. Ill. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5432.
    Ali v. Deegan, Warden.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5439.
    Meneweather v. Fitzharris, Training Facility Superintendent.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5435.
    Rybar v. Nelson, Warden, et al.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5447.
    Baumgart v. New York.
   App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 4th Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5457.
    Principe v. California, et al.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5459.
    Jones v. New York.
   App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 4th Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5476.
    Harvey v. Erickson, Warden.
   Sup. Ct. S. D. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5477.
    Pam v. Washington.
   Ct. App. Wash. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5491.
    Marnin v. New Jersey.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5731.
    Johnson v. Field, Men's Colony Superintendent.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5735.
    Alexander v. Superior Court of California.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5737.
    Wilbur v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5738.
    Muratore v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5739.
    Morehead v. Illinois.
   Sup. Ct. Ill. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5740.
    Garcia et ux. v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5743.
    Gomori v. Pennsylvania.
   Sup. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5744.
    Ozuna v. California.
   Ct. App. Cal., 5th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5747.
    Feldman v. Whipkey's Drug Shop et al.
   Ct. App. Ga. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5748.
    Criswell v. Nevada.
   Sup. Ct. Nev. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5751.
    McLeod v. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5752.
    Havelock v. United States.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5754.
    Dawson et ux. v. Shenandoah Retreat Land Corp. et al.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5755.
    Jordan v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5757.
    Blackwell v. North Carolina.
   Sup. Ct. N. C. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5759.
    Ohmer v. Ohio.
   Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5760.
    Panczko v. United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5762.
    Brown v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5764.
    McCleary v. United States.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5766.
    Corkran v. Maryland.
   Ct. Sp. App. Md. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5767.
    Wimberly v. Craven, Warden, et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5771.
    Stephens v. California.
   Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5772.
    Badger v. LaVallee, Warden.
   App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 2d Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5773.
    Spann v. Michigan.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5775.
    Curtis v. Pate, Warden, et al.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5776.
    Rosenberg v. New York et al.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5777.
    DeJarnette v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5779.
    Angelico v. United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5780.
    Williams v. United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5782.
    Four Star v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5783.
    Swinick v. New York.
   App. Term, Sup. Ct. N. Y., 1st Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5967.
    Swinick v. City of New York Department of Social Services et al.
   App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 1st Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5784.
    Lepiscopo v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5785.
    Shakur et al. v. Murtagh, Judge.
   App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 1st Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5786.
    Howard v. Swenson, Warden.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5789.
    Veach v. Tennessee.
   Sup. Ct. Tenn. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5792.
    Smith v. Lash, Warden.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5793.
    Hyde v. California.
   Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5799.
    Gardner v. Superior Court of New Jersey.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5801.
    Farese v. United States.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5804.
    Esser v. Lion Match Corporation of America.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5806.
    Rollins v. Fitzberger, Warden.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5807.
    Lewis v. Fitzharris, Training Facility Superintendent.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5809.
    Remaley v. New York.
   Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5812.
    O'Neal v. Crouse, Warden.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5813.
    Haushalter v. United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5814.
    Johnson v. United States.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5815.
    Tyler v. Peterson et al.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5816.
    Adams v. Follette, Warden.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5818.
    Orangio v. United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5819.
    Barton et ux. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
   C. -A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5821.
    Jones v. New York.
   App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 1st Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5824.
    Johnson v. United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 269.
    Smith v. New Jersey.
   Sup. Ct. N. J. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Brennan took no part in the consideration or decision of' this petition.


text:
    No. 614.
    No. 615.
    Parker, Commissioner of Department of Transportation of New York v. Citizens Committee for the Hudson Valley et al.; and Volpe, Secretary of Transportation, et al. v. Citizens Committee for the Hudson Valley et al.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Harlan, Mr.. Justice White, and Mr. Justice Black-, mun are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.

Reported below: 425 F. 2d 97.


text:
    No. 654.
    Tiidee Products, Inc. v. International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers, AFL-CIO.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Stewart is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 658.
    Barefoot et al. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America et al.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.

The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Brennan are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 669.
    No. 680.
    No. 681.
    No. 682.
    No. 683.
    No. 684.
    No. 685.
    No. 691.
    No. 692.
    Municipal Distributor Group v. Federal Power Commission et al.; Continental Oil Co. et al. v. Federal Power Commission; Texaco Inc. et al. v. Federal Power Commission; California Co., a Division of Chevron Oil Co. v. Federal Power Commission; Bradco Properties, Inc., et al. v. Federal Power Commission; Cockrell v. Federal Power Commission; Superior Oil Co. v. Federal Power Commisson; Associated Gas Distributors v. Austral Oil Co. et al.; and Public Service Commission of New York v. Amerada Hess Corp. et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Motion of United Distribution Companies for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae in these cases, except No. 681, granted. ■ Certiorari denied. Reported below: 428 F. 2d 4Ó7 and — F. 2d-.


text:
    No. 660.
    Smith, Trustee in Bankruptcy v. Merritt, Referee in Bankruptcy.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Motion to dispense with printing petition granted. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 678.
    Hohensee v. Scientific Living, Inc.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Motion to dispense with printing petition granted. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 671.
    Conoco Plastics, Inc. v. Carr et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Motion to dispense with printing respondents’ brief granted. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 674.
    United States v. Garrett Corp.
   Ct. Cl. Certiorari denied.,

Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Douglas, and Mr. Justice Blackmun are oh the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 677.
    United States v. Palmer et al.
   Ct. Cl. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Douglas, and Mr. Justice Blackmun are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 676.
    Dudley v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 5185.
    Sanders v. South Carolina et al.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 5388.
    Hooker et al. v. Brookhaven Housing Authority.
   Sup. Ct. Miss. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 5736.
    Hairston v. California.
   .App. Dept., Super. Ct. Cal., County of Los Angeles. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that cer-tiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 686.
    Molkenbur v. United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Blackmun took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 701.
    Stimpel v. State Personnel Board of California.
   Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Motion of National Jewish Commission on Law & .Public Affairs for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Cer-tiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 5749.
    Rozenfeld v. New York.
   App. Term, Sup. Ct. N.' Y.,- 1st Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Black is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 5756.
    Torres v. Mancusi, Warden.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Black and Mr.Justice Douglas are of the opinion, that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 5768.
    Calvert v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice White is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 5787.
    Wark v. Maine et al.
   Sup. Jud. Ct. Me. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Harlan, Mr. Justice Stewart, and Mr. Justice Blackmun are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 5797.
    Grisham v. United States.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 178.
    No. 385.
    No. 386.
    No. 387.
    No. 396.
    No. 410.
    No. 427.
    No. 449.
    No. 451.
    No. 5466.
    No. 5475.
    No. 5517.
    Devers v. District of Columbia National Bank, Puerto Rico Telephone Co. v. Figueroa de Arroyo et al., United States et al. v. City of Chicago et al., United States et al. v. Tennessee Public Service Commission et al., Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. v. Tennessee Public Service Commission et al., Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad et al. v. City of Chicago et al., Dawson v. Richardson, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare, Taglia v. Laird, Secretary of Defense, Johnson v. State Bar of California et al., Sturm v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Gay v. United States, Orme v. Field, Men’s Colony Superintendent, et al.,
   ante, p. 820;

ante, p. 877;

ante, p. 8;

ante, p. 8;

ante, P- 8;

ante, p. 8;

ante, p. 830;

ante, p. 831 ;

ante, p. 859;

ante, p. 863;

ante, p. 867; and

ante, p. 879. Petitions for rehearing denied.


text:
    No. 450.
    Smith v. Tennessee,
   ante, p. 831. 'Motion to dispense with printing petition for rehearing granted. Petition for rehearing denied.


text:
    No. 621,
    October Term, 1969.
    Wiseman et al. v. Massachusetts et al.,
   398 U. S. 960. Motion of National Educational Television for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae in support of petition for rehearing granted. Petition for rehearing denied.

Mr. Justice Harlan, Mr. Justice Brennan, and Mr. Justice Blackmun are of the opinion that the petition should be granted. Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and petition.


text:
    No. 395.
    Lazarus v. United States,
   ante, p. 869. Petition for rehearing denied.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of- this petition.


text:
    No. 5220.
    Gilmore v. Gordon et al., Members of California Adult Authority,
   ante, p. 837-, Motion for leave to file petition for rehearing denied.


text:
    December 14, 1970
    No. 733.
    Rafferty et al. v. MacKay et al.
   Affirmed on appeal from D. C. N. D. Cal. Baggett v. Bullitt, 377 U. S. 360.

Mr. Justice Harlan is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.


text:
    No. 732.
    Alabama et al. v. United States et al.
   Appeal from D. C. S. D. Ala. dismissed for want of jurisdiction]


text:
    No. 5854.
    Champs v. Texas.
   Appeal from Ct. Civ. App. Tex., 14th Sup. Jud. Dist., dismissed for want of substantial federal question..

Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Marshall are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument


text:
    No. 41,
    Orig.
    Ohio v. Wyandotte Chemicals Corp. et al.
   Motion of the Solicitor General for allotment of time for oral argument granted and 20 minutes allotted for that purpose. Defendant allotted 20 additional minutes for oral argument. [For earlier order herein, see ante, p. 810.]


text:
    No. 30.
    United States v. Harris.
   C. A. 6th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 397 U. S. 905.] Motion of respondent for appointment of counsel granted. It is ordered that Steven M. Umin, Esquire, of Washington, D. C., a member of the Bar of this Court, be, and he is hereby, appointed to serve as counsel for respondent in this case. .


text:
    No. 85.
    No. 325.
    Gillette v. United States. Negre v. Larsen et al.
   C. A. 2d Cir. [Certiorari granted, 399 U. S. 925]; and

C. A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 399 U. S. 925.] Motion of George T. Altman for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted.


text:
    No. 113.
    Decker, U. S. District Judge, et al. v. Harper & Row Publishers, Inc., et al.
   C. A. 7th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 397 U. S. 1073.] Motion of Northampton County, Pennsylvania, Bar Assn, for leave to' join brief of American Bar Assn, as amicus curiae granted.

Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion!


text:
    No. 336.
    Nelson, Warden v. O’Neil.
   C. A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 901.] Motion of respondent for appointment of counsel granted. It .is ordered that James S. Campbell, Esquire, of Washing-" ton, D. C., a member of the Bar of this Court, be, and he is hereby, appointed to serve as counsel for. respondent in this case.


text:
    No. 281.
    Swann et al. v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education et al.
   C. A. 4th Cir. [Certiorari granted,. 399 U. S. 926.] Motion of Jackson Urban League for leave to strike its name from amici curiae brief granted.


text:
    No. 5858.
    Daugherty v. Craven, Warden.
   Motion for leave to file petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.


text:
    No. 609.
    Graham, Commissioner, Department of Public Welfare of Arizona v. Richardson et al.
   Appeal from D. C. Ariz. Motion of appellee for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Probable jurisdiction noted.


text:
    No. 727.
    Sailer et al. v. Leger et al.
   Appeal from D. C. E. D. Pa. Motion of appellees for leave to proceed. in forma pauperis granted. Probable jurisdiction noted.


text:
    No. 209.
    Kay v. Florida Bar.
   Sup. Ct. Fla. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 705.
    No. 711.
    Chemtronics, Inc., et al. v. Beckman Instruments, Inc., et al.; and Beckman Instruments, Inc., et al. v. Chemtronics, Inc., et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 439 F. 2d 1369.


text:
    No. 708.
    Townsend v. United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 709.
    Long Island Vietnam Moratorium Committee et al. v. Cahn, District Attorney of Nassau County, et al.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 713.
    Payton et ux. v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 714.
    Zezoff v. United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 716.
    Ellingson Timber Co. v. Great Northern Railway Co. et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 717.
    Derby Foods, Inc. v. Food and Drug Administration, U. S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 718.
    Delaware Valley Armaments, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board.
   C; A. 3d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 723.
    Baker et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 725.
    Stevenson et al. v. Board of Education of Wheeler County, Georgia, et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 726.
    Risser et ux. v. Pennsylvania.
   Sup. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 735.
    Business Development Corporation of North Carolina v. United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 736.
    Kellerman v. United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 737.
    National Labor Relations Board v. American Cable Systems, Inc.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5249.
    Butler v. Cady, Warden.
   Sup. Ct. Wis. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5353.
    Juarez v. California.
   Ct. App. Cal., 4th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5411.
    Johnson v. Illinois.
   Sup. Ct. Ill. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5482.
    Ruark v. Colorado.
   Sup. Ct. Colo. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5490.
    Smith v. Illinois.
   Sup. Ct. Ill. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5514.
    Strozier v. Smith, Warden.
   Sup'. Ct. Ga. Certiorari denied..


text:
    No. 5565.
    Hampton v. Johnson, Warden.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5675.
    Peterson v. United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5694.
    Furtak v. New York.
   App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 4th Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5746.
    Pegram v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5761.
    Sanders v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5770.
    Frye v. Patten.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5825.
    Grantham v. California et al.
   C. A; 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.'


text:
    No. 5826.
    Washington v. California.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5827.
    Bain v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5829.
    Waddell v. Bounds et al.
   C. A, 4th Cir; Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5832.
    Hall v. Casscles, Warden.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5833.
    Ranciglio v. United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5836.
    Dixon v. California.
   Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5840.
    Price v. Idaho.
   Sup. Ct. Idaho. Cer-.tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5841.
    Olbrot v. Illinois.
   App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5842.
    McClain v. New York.
   App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 2d Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5845.
    Lewis v. Ohio.
   Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certio-rari denied.


text:
    No. 5846.
    Lewis v. Robinson, U. S. District Judge, et al.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5847.
    Davis v. Follette, Warden.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5851.
    Pointer v. Arkansas.
   Sup. Ct. Ark. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5857.
    McLaughlin v. Director, Patuxent Institution.
   Ct. Sp. App. Md. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5852.
    Chapman, aka Cronin v. California.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5859.
    Schelter v. Perini, Correctional Superintendent.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5860.
    Graves v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5861.
    Porter v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5862.
    Brown v. Virginia.
   Sup. Ct. App. Va. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5863.
    Gray v. United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5864.
    Martin v. United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 536.
    Beto, Corrections Director v. Graves.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 579.
    Goldsmith v. Sutherland.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 5543.
    Mack v. New York.
   Ct. App, N. Y. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Brennan is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 180.
    No. 5556.
    Zemler v. United States, Campbell v. United States,
   ante, p. 820; and

ante, p. 881. Motions for leave to file petitions for rehearing denied.


text:
    No. 201.
    No. 5317.
    No. 465.
    No. 485.
    No. 5811.
    McConney v. United States, McConney v. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit et al., Sayles v. Wiegand et al., Hawthorne v. Illinois, Anderson v. American Broadcasting Co. et al.,
   ante, p. 821;

ante, p. 817;

ante, p. 876;

ante, p. 878; and.

ante, p. 875. Petitions for rehearing denied.


text:
    December 18, 1970
    No. 1101.
    Named Individual Members of the San Antonio Conservation Society v. Texas Highway Department et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Stay heretofore granted by the Court on December 7,1970 [ante, p. 939], vacated.

Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Douglas, Mr. Justice Brennan, and Mr. Justice Marshall dissent from the entry of this order.


text:
    December 21, 1970
    No. 741.
    Chase Brass & Copper Co. v. Franchise Tax Board of California.
   Appeal from Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Motions of Tax Executives Institute, Inc., Financial Executives Institute, and National Association of Manufacturers of the United States et al. for leave to file briefs as amici curiae granted. Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken , as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5874.
    Snoddy v. McNair, Governor of South Carolina, et al.
   Appeal from D. C. S. C. dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Mr. Justice Stewart is of the . opinion that the judgment should be affirmed.


text:
    No. 744.
    Young v. Florida.
   Appeal from-Sup. Ct. Fla. dismissed for want of substantial federal question.


text:
    No. 754.
    8200 Realty Corp. et al. v. Lindsay, Mayor of the City of New York, et al.
   Appeal from Ct.

' App. N. Y. dismissed for. want of substantial federal question.


text:
    No. 762.
    Johnson v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. et al.
   Appeal from Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. D’ist., dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating'the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Blackmun took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


text:
    No. 5875.
    Anderson v. Rockefeller, Governor of New York, et al.
   Appeal from D. C. S. D. N. Y. dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Miscellaneous Orders


text:
    No. 31,
    Orig.
    Utah v. United States.
   Motion of the Solicitor General for an extension of time to file exceptions and brief on Report of Special Master granted, and time extended to and including January 8, 1971. ''

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.

[For previous actions herein, see, e. g., ante, p. 875.]


text:
    No. 338.
    Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois Foundation et al.
   C. A. 7th Cir. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 864.] Motion of Fin-ney Co. for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted, and motion for leave to participate in oral argument as', amicus curiae denied. Motion of respondent University of Illinois Foundation to allow additional time for oral argument denied.


text:
    No. 41,
    Orig.
    Ohio v. Wyandotte Chemicals Corp. et al.
   Motion to permit three attorneys to participate ■ in oral argument on behalf of defendants granted. [For earlier order herein, see ante, p. 810.]


text:
    No. 5175.
    Perez et ux. v. Campbell et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 818.] Motion of Women’s Center Legal Program et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted.


text:
    No. 5257.
    Labine, Tutrix v. Vincent, Administrator.
   Appeal from Sup. Ct. La. [Probable jurisdiction noted, ante, p. 817.] Motion of American Civil Liberties Union for leave to filé a brief as amicus curiae granted. .


text:
    No. 5483.
    No. 5865.
    No. 5883.
    No. 5975.
    Walker v. Pate, Warden, et al.; Szijarto v. Nelson, Warden; Stamper v. Haskins, Correctional Superintendent; and Hawley v. California.
   Motions for leave to file petitions for writs of habeas corpus denied.


text:
    No. 548.
    Ely v. Klahr et al.
   Appeal from D. C. Ariz. Probable jurisdiction noted;


text:
    No. 712.
    Triangle Improvement Council et al. v. Ritchie, Commissioner, State Road Commission of West Virginia, et al.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari granted. [For earlier order herein, see, ante, p. 876.]


text:
    No. 5586.
    Bell v. Burson, Director, Department of Public Safety of Georgia.
   Ct. App. Ga. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certi-orari granted.


text:
    No. 242.
    Samadjopoulos v. National Western Life Insurance Co.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied. [For earlier order herein, see, ante, p. 815.]


text:
    No. 276.
    Paris v. Pennsylvania.
   Super. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 738.
    Craig et al. v. Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 739.
    B’nai B’rith, Inc. v. Joftes.
   C. A. Í). C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 742.
    Transamerican Freight Lines, Inc. v. Locust Cartage Co., Inc.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 743.
    Stewart, Trustee in Bankruptcy v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 746.
    Little v. Green.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certio-rari denied.


text:
    No. 747.
    Marshall, Administrator v. Hollywood, Inc., et al.
   Sup. Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 748.
    Bakewell v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 750.
    Bonanno et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 753.
    Krisel v. Phillips Petroleum Co.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 751.
    Marjorie Webster Junior College, Inc. v. Middle States Association of Colleges & Secondary Schools, Inc.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 755.
    Moore v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 757.
    Baker v. United States.
   C. A. D. C, Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5518.
    Hardin v. Texas.
   Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5522.
    Guziec, aka Haile v. Credit Bureau of Santa Monica Bay District, Inc.
   App. Dept., Super. Ct. Cal., County of Los Angeles. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5529.
    Lyons v. California.
   App. Dept., Super. Ct. Cal., County of San Francisco. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5553.
    Boyd v. New York.
   App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 1st Jud. Dept., Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5574.
    Conklin v. Wainwright, Corrections Director.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari

denied.


text:
    No. 5587.
    Moore v. Follette, Warden.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5796.
    Greene v. United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5830.
    Quintanar-Munoz v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5869.
    Dorsey v. New Jersey.
   G. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5870.
    Brown v. Arkansas.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Cer-. tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5871.
    Cruz v. California.
   Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5876.
    Cassidy v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5878.
    Vitoratos v. Yacobucci.
   Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5882.
    Williams v. Neil, Warden.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorafi denied.


text:
    No. 5885.
    Briscoe v. United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5886.
    Twitty v. United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5889.
    Hart v. Brierley, Correctional Superintendent.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5890.
    Myles v. Procunier, Corrections Director, et al.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5891.
    Strater v. United States.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5893.
    Harris v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. ■


text:
    No. 5894.
    Trigg v. United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5896.
    Bendelow v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5898.
    McCray v. United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5901.
    Franklin v. United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5903.
    Williams v. United States.
   C. A. 6th. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5904.
    Hartman v. United States.
   C. A. 6th. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5909.
    Skolnick v. Will, U. S. District Judge.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5974.
    Washington v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County et al.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 5976.
    Wells v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 286.
    Alaska et al. v. United States et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.

[For earlier order herein, see, ante, p. 815.]


text:
    No. 721.
    Transit Homes, Inc. v. Mastropole et ux.
   Sup. Ct. S. C. Certiorari denied.

The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Blackmun are of the opinion that cer-tiorari should be granted and the judgment of the Supreme Court of South Carolina reversed.