text:
    No. 103,
    Misc.
    Davis v. Illinois.

      William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, and John J. O’Toole and Donald J. Veverka, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Ill. Petition for writ of certiorari dismissed August 8, 1968, pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of this Court.


source: Caselaw Access Project

license: Public Domain

text:
    No. 4.
    Paul H. Aschkar & Co. v. Kamen & Co. et al.

      Allen E. Busman for petitioner.

      Jacob Shearer for respondents.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Writ of certiorari dismissed September 3, 1968, pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of this Court.

[For earlier order herein, see 390 U. S. 942.]


text:
    No. 457.
    Sims et al. v. Banks.

      John B. Miller for petitioners.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Petition for writ of certiorari dismissed September 23, 1968, pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of this Court.


text:
    No. 79,
    Misc.
    Colangelo v. United States.

      Solicitor General Griswold for the United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Petition for writ of certiorari dismissed September 25, 1968, pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of this Court.


text:
    October 7, 1968.
    No. -.
    Hawthorne v. Hardaway, Secretary, Board of Elections, et al.

      Flavius B. Walker, Jr., and Jay J. Levit for applicant.

      R. D. Mcllwaine III, Assistant Attorney General of Virginia, for respondents in opposition.
   Sup. Ct. App. Va. Application for stay presented to The Chief Justice, and by him referred to the Court, denied.


author: Mr. Justice Douglas,

text:
    No.-.
    No.-.
    No.-.
    No.-.
    No. -.
    Morse et al. v. Boswell et al.; Berke et al. v. MacLaughlin et al.; Miazga et al. v. MacLaughlin et al.; Felberbaum et al. v. MacLaughlin et al.; and Looney et al. v. MacLaughlin et al.

      Elsbeth Levy Bothe for Morse et al.; Francis V. Lowden, Jr., for Berke et al.; Mrs. Bothe for Miazga et al.; Philip J. Hirschkop and Michael J. Kunstler for Felberbaum et al.; and Mr. Lowden for Looney et al. Solicitor General Griswold in opposition.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Applications for stays presented to Mr. Justice Douglas and by him referred to the Court, denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas,

dissenting.

On April 10, 1968, the President delegated to the Secretary of Defense power to activate units of the Ready Reserve. On the following day, after receiving a similar delegation of authority to activate such units from the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of the Army called several units of the Ready Reserve and their members to active duty. Applicants, who are members of those units, are challenging that call to active duty on the ground that it exceeds the authority of the Secretary of the Army, and is a violation of their enlistment contracts. After unsuccessfully seeking release from active duty by writ of habeas corpus, and before being able to petition this Court for certiorari,-, applicants were prepared for immediate shipment to Vietnam. To preserve their avenues of review they sought and I granted interim stays pending submission of the stay applications to the full Court. The question now before the Court, therefore, is whether these stays should continue pending our consideration of their petitions for certiorari.

Questions underlying the merits, which have already produced some judicial disagreement, are twofold: first, an alleged usurpation by the Secretary of the Army of the limited authority delegated him; second, a purported conflict between the conditions of enlistment under which applicants entered the reserves and the subsequent Act of Congress calling them to active duty.

I.

First. Applicants argue that the Secretary of the Army improperly called them to active duty for a full period of 24 months, without giving them credit for time already served on active duty. They claim that, in doing so, he exceeded the power granted him. To substantiate their claim, applicants rely on the specific language of delegation, on the treatment of other reservists similarly situated, and on the original intent of Congress.

The language of delegation is in § 101 (e) of Pub. L. 89-687, Title I, October 16, 1966, 80 Stat. 981, 10 U. S. C. § 263 n. (1964 ed., Supp. HI), under which applicants were called. Congress authorized the President to activate “any unit of the Ready Reserve of an armed force for a period of not to exceed twenty-four months.” (Emphasis added.) The President, in turn, delegated his authority under subsection (e) to the Secretary of Defense to activate “any unit in the Ready Reserve ... for a period of not to exceed 24 months.” The Secretary of Defense then delegated his authority by that same language to the Secretary of the Army. The Secretary of the Army, however, called “[t]he above units and [individual] members thereof ... to active duty for 24 consecutive months . . . .” Thus, instead, of calling the above units to active duty and granting their individual members credit for time already served on active duty, he ordered the individuals themselves to active duty for 24 consecutive months, irrespective of any time they may have already served on active duty. In doing so, he seems to have gone beyond the above language of delegation which referred exclusively to units. Moreover, he seems to have violated the organic language of Pub. L. 89-687, Title I, § 101 (c), October 15, 1966, 80 Stat. 981, which provides that:

“A member ordered to active duty under this section may be required to serve on active duty until his total service on active duty or active duty for training equals twenty-four months.”

To uphold the Secretary’s order would seem to discriminate against these applicants called to active duty as part of units under § 101 (e) in favor of those reservists called to active duty as individuals under §§ 101 (a) and (b), by withholding from the former credit which is concededly accorded the latter.

Congress authorized the President to recall the Ready Reserve for two stated purposes: first, to free the President to mobilize those men without forcing him to declare a national emergency; second, and more relevant to this inquiry, to make the active duty obligation of those who enlist in the reserves commensurate with that of those who are drafted. It was felt that young men were enlisting in the reserves “to escape active military service in South Vietnam”; that Congress had allowed “the 6-month [reserve] training program to become ‘an umbrella’ for avoiding active service at a time when we are daily inducting large numbers of men into the active forces to fight in Vietnam”; and, therefore, that “it was only fair that these reservists be put on the same basis for service in Vietnam as new enlistees and draftees.” Thus, it seems that Congress intended to subject reservists to the same obligation for two years’ active duty as is borne by draftees. To do so, it allowed the President to call them for the balance between the time they had already served on active duty and the outer time limit of 24 months.

The President and the Secretary of Defense apparently read the Act of October 15, 1966, as I do; for each of them activated only units of the reserve for 24 months. And a unit, of course, can serve 24 months even though its original members, having already served some time, are sooner discharged. The Secretary of the Army, on the other hand, has subjected these reservists to an additional obligation of 24 months over and above time already served.

II.

Second. The question just discussed covers, so far as I can tell from the fragmentary pleadings and findings, all of the applicants. The second question reaches some of the applicants, but just how many I do not know. The record is not very revealing. But on oral argument, various attorneys stated that the contracts of enlistment vary. According to these informants, some provide for the rendering of active duty “in the event of a mobilization or emergency.” Others provide for active duty in “time of war or of national emergency declared by Congress” as provided in 10 U. S. C. § 672. It should not lightly be concluded that a contract has been unilaterally changed by one party, or that the United States as a party will breach its contract. Cf. Smyth v. United States, 302 U. S. 329.

Where the enlistment contract provides for service in the event of “a mobilization or emergency,” I would assume that a wide variety of events might encompass each term. Indeed the very summoning of reserves to active duty might itself be sufficient to constitute the condition subsequent. But where the enlistment contract contains a provision that active duty is only required in “time of war or of national emergency declared by Congress,” I would, if possible, read the Act of October 15, 1966, to preserve that promise solemnly made to the reservists and not to cover those who were specifically required by contract to serve only in “time of war or of national emergency declared by Congress.”

I assume that it is within the power of Congress to change existing law and no type of estoppel interferes with its law-making power. See Stone, J., concurring, in Perry v. United States, 294 U. S. 330, 359. The disappointment realized by those who relied only on general law but did not have that explicit promise from their government in contract form is disappointment of the kind shared by all citizens in a society of shifting law. Where a reservist, however, has counted on a declaration of war or of an emergency before he is called up and has a contract calling for reserve duty on those precise terms, I would, if possible, read subsequent legislation so as to preserve the promise made in that enlistment contract. Cf. Woods v. Stone, 333 U. S. 472, 481 (dissenting opinion). 10 U. S. C. § 673 subjects reservists to call “[i]n time of national emergency declared by the President after January 1, 1963, or when othenoise authorized by law.” The Congress has not yet declared either war or national emergency within the meaning of § 672; nor has the President declared a national emergency within the meaning of § 673. As stated by Senator Russell:

“Mr. President, I cannot see how any realistic answer can be raised against this amendment [calling up the reserves]. They say, ‘You can call up the units.’ In the first place, it cannot be done, because the President of the United States has to declare a national emergency, and very naturally he does not want to declare a national emergency at this time after we have gone this far without it. . . . [A] declaration of a national emergency would make us look ridiculous in the eyes of the world — to declare a state of emergency in regard to a third-rate power like North Vietnam.”

Thus, the only other provision which §§ 672-673 include as a condition prescribed by law for activating the reserves under the second type of enlistment contract described above lies in the phrase “or when otherwise authorized by law.”

The phrase in § 673 “when otherwise authorized by law” is not without meaning. It plainly refers to those additional conditions — other than war or national emergency — under which members of the reserve can be called to active duty.

One more issue remains. It has been suggested that 10 U. S. C. § 263 gives Congress the power to call the reserves not just in time of war or national emergency, but “[w]henever . . . needed for the national security.” No one, however, disputes that power. For the issue is not the plenary power of Congress under the Constitution, but how legislation shall be read in order, if possible, to avoid creating a “credibility gap” between the people and their government.

III.

“The war power of the United States, like its other powers ... is subject to applicable constitutional limitations.” Hamilton v. Kentucky Distilleries Co., 251 U. S. 146, 156. For that reason, this Court will exercise jurisdiction to review criminal adjudication by the military of civilian (Reid v. Covert, 354 U. S. 1) and military (Burns v. Wilson, 346 U. S. 137) personnel alike and to review administrative action by the military. Thus, in Orloff v. Willoughby, 345 U. S. 83, where a doctor inductee complained that the Secretary of the Army had wrongfully denied him medical detail, we were unanimous in agreeing that we had jurisdiction to review the power of the Secretary; that he had no power to deny petitioner such medical assignments; and that we were prepared to prevent him from doing so. Similarly here, where the Secretary purportedly has no power to recall reservists whom he promised to activate only in war or national emergency, we have jurisdiction to prevent him from doing so, at least where Congress has not precluded such jurisdiction. See Harmon v. Brucker, 355 U. S. 579, 581-583.

I would continue the stays until the merits of this important controversy can be resolved.

       Exec. Order No. 11406, 33 Fed. Reg. 5735 (1968).

       Memorandum for Secretaries of the Military Departments, April 11, 1968, as cited in Brief for Appellants 5, Morse v. Boswell, 401 F. 2d 544.

       Joint Message form DA 859314, April 11, 1968, as cited in Brief for Appellants, ibid.

       Applicant in Winters v. United States, 390 U. S. 993, had been called to duty as an individual rather than as part of a unit; and unlike applicants in these cases, apparently did not challenge the authority of the Secretary of the Army to call him for a full 24 months of active duty irrespective of time already served on active duty.

       Compare Winters v. United States, 281 F. Supp. 289 (D. C. E. D. N. Y.), aff’d per curiam, 390 F. 2d 879 (C. A. 2d Cir. 1968), with Gion v. McNamara, Civ. No. 67-1563 (D. C. C. D. Calif., January 9, 1968).

       Applicants have also raised other questions which I consider too unsubstantial to discuss.

        Sufra, n. 1 (emphasis added).

        Supra, n. 2.

        Supra, n. 3 (emphasis added).

       In enacting Pub. L. 89-687, § 101, Congress made a distinction between reservists called as individuals and reservists called as units. That distinction, however, related only to its desire to keep reserve units as much intact as possible; consequently, it only authorized the call of those individual reservists who were not attached to such units, who had not been participating satisfactorily in their present units, or who had had less than 120 days of active duty experience. The distinction between individuals and units would seem to have nothing to do with the question whether reservists called as part of units should be credited for time already served on active duty. In making permanent the President’s temporary authority to activate for 24 months those individuals not participating satisfactorily in their reserve units, Congress reaffirmed its intention to credit them for time already served on active duty. Pub. L. 90-40, June 30, 1967, § 6, 81 Stat. 105.

       112 Cong. Rec. 19718 (1966) (remarks of Senator Russell, Chairman of Senate Armed Services Committee, and cosponsor of the amendment, which became Pub. L. 89-687).

       112 Cong. Rec. 19724 (1966) (remarks of Senator Lausche).

       112 Cong. Rec. 19720 (1966) (remarks of Senator Symington, member of Senate Armed Services Committee).

       112 Cong. Rec. 19500 (1966) (remarks of Senator SaLtonstall, ranking minority member, of the Senate Armed Services Committee and cosponsor of the amendment) (emphasis added).

       Cf. Bell v. United States, 366 U. S. 393; Perry v. United States, 294 U. S. 330; In re Grimley, 137 U. S. 147, 150.

       112 Cong. Reo. 19726 (1966) (Chairman of Senate Armed Services Committee).

       Under 10 U. S. C. § 672 (b), a reservist may be called to active duty at any time for a period of 15 days. Pursuant to 10 U. S. C. § 679 a reservist may sign an active duty agreement by which he obligates himself to serve at any time on active duty that he is called; furthermore, that obligation may be extended beyond the expiration date of the agreement in times of war or national emergency. 10 U. S. C. § 672 (d).


text:
    No. 606.
    Cleaver et al. v. Jordan, Secretary of State of California.

      Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Charles A. Barrett, Assistant Attorney General, and Jefferson Frazier, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    October 8, 1968.
    No. 145,
    Misc.
    Thomas v. United States.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Petition for writ of certiorari dismissed October 8, 1968, pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of this Court.


text:
    No. 613.
    McArthur et al. v. Clifford, Secretary of Defense, et al.

      Philip J. Hirschkop for applicants.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Application for stay denied.


text:
    October 11, 1968.
    No. —.
    Sullivan et al. v. Cushman et al.

      Moses M. Falk on the motion.

      Solicitor General Griswold for respondents in opposition.
   D. C. Mass. Motion for stay, referred to the Court, denied. Mr. Justice Douglas would grant the stay.


text:
    October 14, 1968.
    No. 9,
    Orig.
    United States v. Louisiana et al.

      Jack P. F. Gremillion, Attorney General of Louisiana, John L. Madden, Assistant Attorney General, and Victor A. Sachse, Paul M. Hebert, Thomas W. Leigh, W. Scott Wilkinson, J. B. Miller, Oliver P. Stockwell, J. J. Davidson, and Frederick W. Ellis, Special Assistant Attorneys General, on the motion.
    [For earlier order herein, see 391 U. S. 910.]
   Case set for argument on supplemental decrees proposed by the United States and the State of Texas. Motion of the State of Louisiana for additional time for oral argument on supplemental decree applicable to it denied.

The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of these matters.


text:
    No. 19.
    Universal Interpretive Shuttle Corp. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission et al.

      Russell W. Cunningham for respondent Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission, and Manuel J. Davis for respondent D. C. Transit System, Inc., on the motions.

      Jeffrey L. Nagin and Ralph S. Cunningham, Jr., for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold for the United States, as amicus curiae, and Mr. Davis for respondent D. C. Transit System, Inc., in opposition to the motion of respondent Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. [Certiorari granted, 390 U. S. 943.] Motion of respondent Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission to preclude argument on question not in issue, and the motion of respondent D. C. Transit System, Inc., to clarify the status of question regarding D. C. Transit System’s franchise, denied.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.


text:
    No. 993,
    Misc.
    In re Disbarment of Lichota.
   It is ordered that Edith Fischer Lichota, of Toledo, Ohio, be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty days, requiring her to show cause why she should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.


text:
    No. 39.
    Perez v. California.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. [Cer-tiorari granted, 390 U. S. 942.] Motion of petitioner for appointment of counsel granted. It is ordered that Peter G. Fetros, Esquire, of San Francisco, California, be, and he is hereby, appointed to serve as counsel for petitioner in this case.


text:
    No. 53.
    Kaufman v. United States.

      Bruce R. Jacob on the motion.
    [For earlier orders herein, see, e. g., 391 U. S. 901.]
   C. A. 8th Cir. Motion of petitioner for transcription and certification of additional portions of record granted.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.


text:
    No. 56.
    Lear, Inc. v. Adkins.

      Solicitor General Gris-wold for the United States on the motion.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. [Cer-tiorari granted, 391 U. S. 912.] Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument, as amicus curiae, granted and twenty minutes allotted for that purpose. A similar amount of time likewise allotted to counsel for respondent.


text:
    No. 71.
    Presbyterian Church in the United States et al. v. Mary Elizabeth Blue Hull Memorial Presbyterian Church et al.
   Sup. Ct. Ga. [Certiorari granted, 392 U. S. 903.] Motion of Right Reverend John E. Hines, Presiding Bishop of the Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America, for leave to file a brief, as amicus curiae, granted.


text:
    No. 44.
    Skinner et al. v. Louisiana.

      G. Wray Gill, Sr., on the motion.
   Sup. Ct. La. [Certiorari granted, 391 U. S. 963.] Motion of petitioners for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis granted.


text:
    No. 74.
    Stiles v. United States.
   C. A. 1st Cir. [Certiorari granted, 391 U. S. 903.] Motion of petitioner for appointment of counsel granted. It is ordered that Charles J. Rogers, Jr., Esquire, of Providence, Rhode Island, be, and he is hereby, appointed to serve as counsel for petitioner in this case.


text:
    No. 81.
    No. 128.
    Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. McElroy et al.; and Terminal Railroad Association of St. Louis v. McElroy et al.
   C. A. 7th Cir. ’ The Solicitor General is invited to file briefs in these cases expressing the views of the United States.


text:
    No. 191.
    Snell et al. v. Wyman, Commissioner of Department of Social Services of New York, et al.
   Appeal from D. C. S. D. N. Y. The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.


text:
    No. 163.
    Younger, District Attorney of Los Angeles County v. Harris et al.
   Appeal from D. C. C. D. Cal. The Attorney General of California is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the State of California.


text:
    No. 198.
    Smith v. Hooey, Judge.
   Sup. Ct. Tex. [Certiorari granted, 392 U. S. 925.] Motion of petitioner for appointment of counsel granted. It is ordered that Charles Alan Wright, Esquire, of Austin, Texas, a member of the Bar of this Court, be, and he is hereby, appointed to serve as counsel for petitioner in this case.


text:
    No. 193.
    International Salt Co. v. Ohio Turnpike Commission.

      Robert D. Stiles on the motion.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Motion of petitioner to defer consideration of petition for writ of certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 199.
    Harris, U. S. District Judge (Walker, Real Party in Interest) v. Nelson, Warden.
   C. A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 392 U. S. 925.] Motion of petitioner for appointment of counsel granted. It is ordered that J. Stanley Pottinger, Esquire, of San Francisco, California, be, and he is hereby, appointed to serve as counsel for petitioner in this case.


text:
    No. 620.
    Moore et al. v. Shapiro, Governor of Illinois, et al.
    Mr. Justice Fortas would grant the motion.

      Richard F. Watt on the motion.

      William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, and John J. O’Toole and Thomas E. Brannigan, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees in opposition.
   Appeal from D. C. N. D. Ill. Because of the representation of the State of Illinois that “it would be a physical impossibility” for the State “to effectuate the relief which the appellants seek,” the “Motion to Advance and Expedite the Hearing and Disposition of this Cause” is denied.


text:
    No. 197.
    Butenko v. United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. [Certiorari granted, 392 U. S. 923.] Motion of petitioner for appointment of counsel granted. It is ordered that Charles Danzig, Esquire, of Newark, New Jersey, a member of the Bar of this Court, be, and he is hereby, appointed to serve as counsel for petitioner in this case.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.


text:
    No. 647.
    Hadnott et al. v. Amos, Secretary of State of Alabama, et al.
    Mr. Justice Black took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.

      Charles Morgan, Jr., Reber F. Boult, Jr., Orzell Billingsley, Jr., Melvin L. Wulf, and Eleanor Holmes Norton for applicants.
   D. C. M. D. Ala. Application for restoration of temporary relief granted pending oral argument on the application, which is set for Friday, October 18, 1968, at 9 a. m.


text:
    No. 594,
    Misc.
    Time, Inc., et al. v. Bon Air Hotel, Inc.

      Harold R. Medina, Jr., on the motion.
   C. A. 5th Cir and D. C. S. D. Ga. Motion for leave to file petition for writ of certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 451,
    Misc.
    Jones v. Blackwell, Warden.

      Solicitor General Griswold for respondent in opposition.
   Motion for leave to file petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.


text:
    No. 11,
    Misc.
    Wharton v. Crouse, Warden.

      Robert C. Londerholm, Attorney General of Kansas, and Edward G. Collister, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for respondent in opposition to the motion.
   Motion for leave to file petition for writ of habeas corpus denied. The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Brennan, and Mr. Justice Stewart would transfer this case to the United States District Court under 28 U. S. C. § 2241 (b). Peyton v. Rowe, 391 U. S. 54.


text:
    No. 140,
    Misc.
    Miller v. Udall, Secretary of the Interior, et al.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Martz, and Roger P. Marquis for respondent Udall in opposition.
   Motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition denied.


text:
    No. 266,
    No. 272,
    No. 302,
    No. 346,
    No. 347,
    No. 353,
    No. 367,
    No. 381,
    No. 419,
    No. 436,
    No. 501,
    No. 509,
    No. 511,
    No. 558,
    No. 579,
    No. 584,
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Chandler v. Turner, Warden; McCray v. Willingham, Warden; Pelletier v. Parker, Warden; Magee v. Nelson, Warden, et al.; Jones v. Follette, Warden; Kanieski v. Burke, Warden; In re Kamsler; Card v. Kropp, Warden; Holscher v. Young, Warden; Taylor v. Burke, Warden; Hayman v. Fitzharris, Training Facility Superintendent; Roberts v. Peyton, Penitentiary Superintendent; Lacaze et al. v. Blackwell, Warden; Byrd v. Nelson, Warden; Cowling v. Craven, Warden; and Owen v. Arkansas.
   Motions for leave to file petitions for writs of habeas corpus denied.


text:
    No. 296,
    No. 316,
    No. 334,
    No. 361,
    No. 536,
    No. 576,
    Misc.;
    Misc.;
    Misc.;
    Misc.;
    Misc.;
    Misc.;
    Smith v. Hocker, Warden; Anderten v. Warden, South Dakota Penitentiary; Nielson v. Erickson, Warden; Welsh v. Nelson, Warden; Fossum v. Porter, Sheriff; and Welsh v. Nelson, Warden.
   Motions for leave to file petitions for writs of habeas corpus denied. Treating the papers submitted as petitions for writs of certiorari, certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 200,
    No. 205,
    Misc.;
    Misc.
    Harshaw v. Levin, U. S. District Judge; and Biggs v. Campbell, U. S. District Judge.
   Motions for leave to file petitions for writs of mandamus denied.


text:
    No. 105,
    Misc.
    Allison v. Nelson, Warden, et al.

      Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Albert W. Harris, Assistant Attorney General, and Charles R. B. Kirk, Deputy Attorney General, for respondents in opposition.
   Motion for leave to file petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.


text:
    No. 169,
    Misc.
    Wilson v. California.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Motion for leave to file petition for writ of cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 526,
    Misc.
    Colchico et al. v. Sweigert, U. S. District Judge.

      Melvin B. Belli on the motion.

      Solicitor General Griswold for respondent in opposition.
   Motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus denied.


text:
    No. 374,
    Misc.
    Osborn v. Weick, Chief Judge, U. S. Court of Appeals, et al.

      Maclin P. Davis, Jr., on the motion.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Paul C. Summitt for respondent United States in opposition.
   Motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus denied.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.


text:
    No. 448,
    No. 532,
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Ortega v. Montante, Judge; and Anderson v. United States et al.
   Motions for leave to file petitions for writs of prohibition denied.


text:
    No. 516,
    Misc.
    American Pipe & Construction Co. v. Pence, U. S. District Judge.

      Norbert A. Schlei and George W. Jansen on the motion.

      William H. Ferguson and Charles S. Bur-dell in opposition.
   Motion for leave to file petition for writ of prohibition and/or mandamus denied.


text:
    No. 258.
    Kramer v. Union Free School District No. 15 et al.

      Melvin L. Wulf, Murray A. Miller, and Alan H. Levine for appellant.

      John P. Jehu for appellees.

      Louis J. Lefkowitz, pro se, and Daniel M. Cohen, Assistant Attorney General, for the Attorney General of New York, intervenor below.
   Appeal from D. C. E. D. N. Y. Probable jurisdiction noted.


text:
    No. 376.
    Dunbar-Stanley Studios, Inc. v. Alabama.

      J. Edward Thornton for appellant.

      MacDonald Gallion, Attorney General of Alabama, and Willard W. Livingston and William H. Burton, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.
   Appeal from Sup. Ct. Ala. Probable jurisdiction noted.


text:
    No. 48.
    Julian Messner, Inc., et al. v. Spahn.

      Selig J. Levitan for appellants.

      Frederic A. Johnson for ap-pellee.

      Irwin Karp for Authors League of America, Inc., as amicus curiae.

   Appeal from Ct. App. N. Y. Probable jurisdiction noted. Counsel are requested to discuss in their briefs and oral arguments, in addition to the other questions presented, question whether injunctive relief provided in final judgment entered September 3, 1964, in the Supreme Court for the County of New York constitutes an unconstitutional restraint upon publication.


text:
    No. 370.
    Koota, District Attorney of Kings County v. Zwickler.

      Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowñtz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Brenda Soloff, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.
   Appeal from D. C. E. D. N. Y. Probable jurisdiction noted.


text:
    No. 293.
    Stanley v. Georgia.

      Wesley R. Asinof for appellant.

      Lems R. Slaton, J. Walter LeCraw, and J. Robert Sparks for appellee.
   Appeal from Sup. Ct. Ga. Probable jurisdiction noted.


text:
    No. 269.
    Gunn, Sheriff, et al. v. University Committee to End the War in Viet Nam et al.

      Crawford C. Martin, Attorney General of Texas, Nola White, First Assistant Attorney General, A. J. Ca-rubbi, Jr., Executive Assistant Attorney General, and Hawthorne Phillips and Howard M. Fender, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellants.

      Sam Houston Clinton, Jr., for appellees.
   Appeal from D. C. W. D. Tex. Probable jurisdiction noted.


text:
    No. 238.
    Wells v. Rockefeller, Governor of New York, et al.

      Robert B. McKay for appellant.

      Louis J. Lefkowits, Attorney General of New York, pro se, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and George D. Zuckerman, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
   Appeal from D. C. S. D. N. Y. Probable jurisdiction noted. Case set for oral argument to follow Nos. 30 and 31 [390 U. S. 939, October Term, 1967, Nos. 1116 and 1117].


text:
    No. 156.
    Kramer v. Caribbean Mills, Inc.

      Eugene Gressman for petitioner.

      Morris Harrell for respondent.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 158.
    Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen et al. v. O’Connell et al.

      Arnold B. Elkind for petitioners.

      Ruth Wey- and for respondents.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 280.
    United States v. Skelly Oil Co.

      Solicitor General Gris-wold, Assistant Attorney General Rogovin, Harris Wein-stein, Myron C. Baum, and Boring W. Post for the United States.

      Robert J. Casey and Thomas J. McCoy, Jr., for respondent.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 291.
    Federal Marine Terminals, Inc. v. Burnside Shipping Co., Ltd.

      Robert C. Keck for petitioner.

      Lucian Y. Ray for respondent.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 306.
    Fortner Enterprises, Inc. v. United States Steel Corp. et al.

      John P. Sandidge for petitioner.

      Leo T. Wolford and W. H. Buchanan for respondents.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 172.
    Dirks et al. v. Birkholz et al.

      David Previant and David Leo Uelmen for Dirks, John J. Naughton for Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen, and James P. Reedy for Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Co., petitioners.

      Ruth Wey- and for respondents.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari granted. Case set to follow No. 158 [mpra],


text:
    No. 329,
    Misc.
    Boykin v. Alabama.

      E. Graham Gibbons for petitioner.

      MacDonald Gallion, Attorney General of Alabama, and David W. Clark, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Ala. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted and case transferred to appellate docket.


text:
    No. 273.
    Scofield et al. v. National Labor Relations Board et al.

      James Urdan for petitioners.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, and Norton J. Come for National Labor Relations Board, and Joseph L. Rauh, Jr., John Silard, Harriett R. Taylor, and Stephen I. Schlossberg for International Union, UAW, respondents.

      Walter S. Davis for Wisconsin Manufacturers’ Assn, et al., as amici curiae, in support of the petition.
    A brief was filed by Illinois Manufacturers Assn., as amicus curiae, in support of the petition.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari granted, reserving for decision, after argument, question of whether the petition for writ of certiorari was timely filed.


text:
    No. 60,
    Misc.
    Davis v. Mississippi.

      Jack Greenberg, Michael Meltsner, Melvyn Zarr, Anthony G. Amsterdam, and Jack Young for petitioner.

      Joe T. Patterson, Attorney General of Mississippi, and G. Garland Lyell, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Miss. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted limited to the first question presented by the petition which reads as follows: “Whether the introduction into evidence at petitioner’s criminal trial of his fingerprints, taken as a result of petitioner’s illegal arrest, violated petitioner’s rights, under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments?” Case transferred to appellate docket.


text:
    No. 529,
    Misc.
    Frazier v. Cupp, Warden.

      R. W. Nahstoll for petitioner.

      Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General of Oregon, and David H. Blunt, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted and case transferred to appellate docket.


text:
    No. 68,
    Misc.
    Orozco v. Texas.

      Charles W. Tessmer for petitioner.

      Crawford C. Martin, Attorney General of Texas, Nola White, First Assistant Attorney General, A. J. Carubbi, Jr., Executive Assistant Attorney General, and Robert C. Flowers and Lonny F. Zwiener, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.
   Ct. Crim App. Tex. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted and case transferred to appellate docket.


text:
    No. 560,
    Misc.
    Boulden v. Holman, Warden.

      MacDonald Callion, Attorney General of Alabama, and David W. Clark, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted and case transferred to appellate docket.


text:
    No. 202,
    Misc.
    O’Callahan v. Parker, Warden.

      Victor Rabino-witz and Leonard B. Boudin for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold for respondent.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted limited to the first question presented by the petition which reads as follows: “Does a court-martial, held under the Articles of War, Tit. 10, U. S. C. § 801 et seq., have jurisdiction to try a member of the Armed Forces who is charged with commission of a crime cognizable in a civilian court and having no military significance, alleged to have been committed off-post and while on leave, thus depriving him of his constitutional rights to indictment by a grand jury and trial by a petit jury in a civilian court?” Case transferred to appellate docket.


text:
    No. 58.
    Somerville v. Illinois.

      Charles A. Bellows for petitioner.

      John J. Stamos and Joel M. Flaum for respondent.
   App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 59.
    Somerville et al. v. Illinois.

      Charles A. Bellows for petitioners.

      John J. Stamos and Joel M. Flaum for respondent.
   App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 70.
    No. 72.
    Parrish v. United States; and Parzow v. United States.

      Walter E. Rogers for petitioner in No. 70, and Raymond W. Bergan and Thomas R. Dyson, Jr., for petitioner in No. 72.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, and Philip R. Monahan for the United States in both cases.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 66.
    Alvarez v. Nebraska.

      Melvin L. Wulf and Anthony G. Amsterdam for petitioner.

      Clarence A. H. Meyer, Attorney General of Nebraska, and Ralph H. Gillan, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Neb. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 64.
    Metheany v. United States.

      Murray L. Randall for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75.
    Carolina Pipeline Co. v. York County Natural Gas Authority.

      H. Simmons Tate, Jr., and John M. Spratt for petitioner.

      David W. Robinson II and C. W. F. Spencer, Jr., for respondent.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 78.
    Big Run Coal & Clay Co. v. National Labor Relations Board.

      Lowell T. Hughes for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, and Norton J. Come for respondent..
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 79.
    Dubin-Haskell Lining Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board.

      Deane Ramey for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, Norton J. Come, and Elliott Moore for respondent.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 83.
    American Manufacturing Co. of Texas v. Heald Machine Co.

      Munson H. Lane for petitioner.

      Norman S. Blodgett for respondent.
   C. C. P. A. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 90.
    Goodman et al. v. United States.

      Jay Leo Rothschild for petitioners.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Rogovin, and Philip R. Miller for the United States.
   Ct. Cl. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 86.
    AMP Inc. v. Cohen, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare, et al.

      Marshall M. Holcombe, Vincent A. Klein-jeld, Alan H. Kaplan, Selma M. Levine, and Joel E. Hoffman for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and James W. Knapp for respondents.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 87.
    Clark, Guardian v. Great American Insurance Co. of New York.

      Cecil D. Franklin for petitioner.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 89.
    Steadham et al. v. Georgia.

      G. Hughel Harrison for petitioners.
   Sup. Ct. Ga. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 92.
    Duggar v. United States.

      Joseph W. Louisell and Ivan E. Barris for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Kirby W. Patterson for the United States.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 93.
    Grimes et al. v. United States.

      W. 0. Cooper, Jr., for petitioners.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Edward Fenig for the United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 96.
    Orlando Daily Newspapers, Inc., et al. v. Belli.

      William Y. Akerman for petitioners.

      Paul A. Louis and Bertha Claire Lee for respondent.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88.
    Bartsch v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc.

      Monroe E. Stein and Stanley Rothenberg for petitioner.

      Eugene L. Girden for respondent.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 97.
    Powe et vir v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

      M. M. Roberts for petitioners.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Rogovin, and Carolyn R. Just for respondent.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 99.
    Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co. et al. v. Federal Power Commission et al.

      Walter E. Beckjord for Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co., and William A. McClain for City of Cincinnati, petitioners.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Richard A. Solomon, and Peter H. Schiff for Federal Power Commission; J. David Mann, Jr., for City of Hamilton; and Christopher T. Boland, George J. Mei-burger, and Robert 0. Koch for Texas Gas Transmission Corp., respondents.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 100.
    Suther v. City of Midfield, Inc., et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 101.
    DeNiro et al. v. United States.

      James J. Carroll for petitioners.

      Solicitor General Griswold for the United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 102.
    Shapard v. Oklahoma.

      David C. Shapard for petitioner.

      G. T. Blankenship, Attorney General of Oklahoma, and Penn Lerblance, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   Ct. Crim. App. Okla. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 103.
    Winkler v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co. et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 104.
    United States v. Cajo Trading, Inc.

      Solicitor General Gris-wold, Assistant Attorney General Weisl, John C. Eld-ridge, and Robert V. Zener for the United States.

      James R. Sharp for respondent.
   C. C. P. A. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 105.
    Continental Casualty Co. v. United States for the Use and Benefit of Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co.

      Kahl K. Spriggs for petitioner.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 107.
    Ianniello v. New York.

      Maurice Edelbaum and William Sonenshine for petitioner.

      Frank S. Hogan and H. Richard Uviller for respondent.
   Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 110.
    Komitor v. United States.

      Jerome Lewis for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Mervyn Hamburg for the United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 111.
    Smith v. United States.

      Philip Blank for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 118.
    Vince et ux. v. United States.

      Solicitor General Griswold for the United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 112.
    Difco Laboratories, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board.

      Leonard A. Keller for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, Norton J. Come, and Leonard M. Wagman for respondent.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 113.
    Mandask Compania de Vapores, S. A. v. Federazione Italiana dei Consorzi Agrari et al.

      Edwin Longcope and David C. Wood for petitioner.

      Walter P. Hickey for respondents.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 115.
    Del Mar et al., Executors v. United States.

      Brackley Shaw for petitioners.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Rogovin, and Robert N. Anderson for the United States.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 116.
    General Longshore Workers, I. L. A., Local Union 1418, et al. v. New Orleans Steamship Assn.

      Alvin J. Liska for petitioners.

      Samuel Lang for respondent.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 121.
    Abinoja et al. v. Immigration and Naturalization Service.

      Melvyn E. Stein for petitioners.

      Solicitor General Gris-wold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, and Beatrice Rosenberg for respondent.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 127.
    Bassick Co. et al. v. Blake et al.

      Dugald S. McDougall and Augustus G. Douvas for petitioners.

      John D. Dewey for respondents.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 123.
    American Finishing Co. v. National Labor Relations Board.

      William W. Goodman for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, and Norton J. Come for respondent.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 125.
    No. 126.
    Luria Brothers & Co., Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission; and Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp. et al. v. Federal Trade Commission.

      Morris Wolf for petitioner in No. 125. Arthur Littleton for petitioner Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp.; Albert R. Connelly for petitioner Bethlehem Steel Corp.; Howard M. Holtzmann for petitioner CF&I Steel Corp.; C. M. Thorp, Jr., and Charles Weiss for petitioner Edge-water Steel Co.; William R. Bascom and Edwin S. Taylor for petitioner Granite City Steel Co.; Roger T. Clapp for petitioner Grinnell Corp.; Samuel D. Slade for petitioner Lukens Steel Co.; William B. Cudlip for petitioner McLouth Steel Corp.; Mr. Weiss for petitioners National Steel Corp. et al.; and W. H. Buchanan for petitioner United States Steel Corp., in No. 126. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Zimmerman, James Mcl. Henderson, and David B. Morris for respondent in both eases.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 135.
    Funk v. Funk et al.

      Leven B. Ferrin for petitioner.

      Ralph E. Hunsaker for respondents.
   Ct. App. Ariz. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 140.
    Good-All Electric Mfg. Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

      James J. Fitzgerald, Jr., for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Rogovin, Crombie J. D. Garrett, and Louis M. Kauder for respondent.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certio-rari denied.


text:
    No. 142.
    Grogan v. United States.

      Hubert Humphrey for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Sidney M. Glazer for the United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 145.
    Williams et al. v. United States.

      G. W. Gill, Sr., for petitioners.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Mervyn Hamburg for the United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 148.
    Fullbright v. United States.

      David C. Shapard for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Kirby W. Patterson for the United States.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 151.
    Nason v. Immigration and Naturalization Service.

      Rita E. Hauser for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Paul C. Summiit for respondent.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 152.
    Trust Co. of Georgia, Executor, et al. v. Ross, District Director of Internal Revenue.

      Francis Shackelford, James E. Thomas, H. C. Kilpatrick, and John W. Gillon for petitioners.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Rogovin, and Harry Baum for respondent.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 153.
    Eaton v. California.
   Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 154.
    Fort Howard Paper Co. v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.

      Ellsworth M. Jennison and Arthur L. Morsell for petitioner.

      Jerome Gilson for respondent.
   C. C. P. A. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 155.
    Abramson et ux. v. Colonial Oil Co.

      Walter Warren for petitioners.

      C. Harris Dittmar for respondent.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 157.
    Houston et al. v. United States.

      G. Edward Friar for petitioners.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, and Philip R. Monahan for the United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 160.
    International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW) v. National Labor Relations Board et al.

      Stephen I. Schlossberg, John A. Fillion, Jordan Rossen, and Bernard F. Ashe for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, and Norton J. Come for National Labor Relations Board; and Owen J. Neighbours for Pierce Governor Co., Inc., respondents.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 162.
    Golubin v. United States.

      F. Lee Bailey for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold for the United States.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 182.
    Truchinski v. United States.

      Solicitor General Griswold for the United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 167.
    Banco Credito y Ahorro Ponceno v. National Labor Relations Board.

      Guy Farmer and William Lespier for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold for respondent.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 169.
    DePugh v. United States.

      Charles B. Blackmar for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Jerome M. Feit for the United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 170.
    Local Union No. 705, Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders Union, AFL-CIO v. Wirtz, Secretary of Labor.

      Ernest Goodman for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Gris-wold, Assistant Attorney General Weisl, Alan S. Rosen-thal, and Robert V. Zener for respondent.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 171.
    Bricklayers, Masons & Plasterers’ International Union of America, Local 11, AFL-CIO v. National Labor Relations Board.

      Irving Kessler for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, and Norton J. Come for respondent.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 173.
    Gorman v. United States.

      Anna R. Bavin and Edward J. Caliban, Jr., for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Rogovin, Joseph M. Howard, and John M. Brant for the United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 186.
    Mills v. New Jersey.

      Eugene P. Kenny for petitioner.
   Sup. Ct. N. J. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 174.
    Hansen v. United States.

      Philip J. Lesser for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Marshall Tamor Golding for the United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 176.
    Rexach v. United States.

      Walter L. Newsom, Jr., for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Rogovin, Meyer Rothwacks, and Louis M. Kauder for the United States.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 178.
    Kramer v. Washington.

      John A. Kendrick for petitioner.

      John F. Wilson for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Wash. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 183.
    A. J. Industries, Inc. v. United States.

      Carl A. Stutsman, Jr., for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Rogovin, and Robert N. Anderson for the United States.
   Ct. Cl. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 185.
    Attocknie v. Udall, Secretary of the Interior.

      Durward McDaniel and David Cobb for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Marts, and Roger P. Marquis for respondent.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 189.
    Jacobsen, Administrator v. International Transport, Inc., et al.

      Walter A. Newport, Jr., for petitioner.

      George E. Wright for respondents.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 187.
    Preuss, Trustee in Bankruptcy v. General Electric Co., Inc.

      John A. Reilly for petitioner.

      John Hoxie for respondent.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 188.
    Miami Beach First National Bank et al., Executors, et al. v. Inter-Continental Promotions, Inc.

      Manon E. Sibley and Robert C. Ward for petitioners.

      Murray Sams, Jr., for respondent.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 190.
    Campbell v. United States.

      Ernest J. Howard for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 194.
    Carson Pirie Scott & Co. et al. v. Factor.

      George W. McBurney for Carson Pirie Scott & Co., Jack Edward Dwork for Kroch’s & Brentano’s, Inc., Narcisse A. Brown and William F. McNally for the Fair, and Eloise Johnstone for Brennan, petitioners.

      Albert E. Jenner, Jr., Philip W. Tone, and Keith F. Bode for respondent.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 196.
    De Simone v. United States.

      Irving Anolik for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold for the United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 204.
    Bauch et al. v. City of New York et al.

      Samuel J. Cohen for petitioners.

      J. Lee Rankin, Norman Redlich, and Pauline K. Berger for respondents.
   Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 192.
    Walker v. Ohio River Co.

      Harry Alan Sherman for petitioner.

      Harold R. Schmidt for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 202.
    Lee Rubber & Tire Corp. v. United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic Workers of America, AFL-CIO, Local 102, et al.

      Edwin P. Rome and Goncer M. Krestal for petitioner.

      Samuel L. Rothbard for respondents.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 207.
    Maryland Petition Committee et al. v. Johnson, President of the United States, et al.

      Geo. Washington Williams for petitioners.

      Solicitor General Griswold for respondents.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 208.
    Rayex Corp. et al. v. American Optical Co. et al.

      John Vaughan Groner and Jules P. Kirsch for petitioners.

      Edward C. Wallace for respondents.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 209.
    Marcan Products Corp. et al. v. A. H. Emery Co.

      John M. Calimafde, Roy C. Hopgood, and Paul H. Blaustein for petitioners.

      John C. Blair for respondent.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 213.
    Langley v. Indiana.

      William C. Erbecker for petitioner.

      John J. Dillon, Attorney General of Indiana, Douglas B. McFadden, Assistant Attorney General, and Murray West, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Ind. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 215.
    Baker et al. v. United States.

      George T. Davis for petitioners.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Marshall Tamor Golding for the United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 217.
    Johnson v. Benbrook Water & Sewer Authority.

      Henry E. Kerry for petitioner.

      S. G. Johndroe, Jr., for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Tex. and/or Ct. Civ. App. Tex., 2d Sup. Jud. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 218.
    Alcoa Steamship Co., Inc. v. Charles Ferran & Co., Inc., et al.

      Benjamin W. Yancey for petitioner.

      Leon Sarpy, James G. Burke, Jr., and Paul A. Nalty for respondents.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 220.
    Shapiro v. Shapiro.

      Charles A. Bellows for petitioner.

      Samuel A. Rinella for respondent.
   App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 222.
    Weyerhaeuser Co. v. United States.

      Kenneth E. Roberts and Snyder J. King for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Martz, and Roger P. Marquis for the United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 224.
    J. P. Stevens & Co., Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board et al.

      Whiteford S. Blakeney for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, and Norton J. Come for respondent National Labor Relations Board.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certio-rari denied.


text:
    No. 223.
    Mahoney et al. v. Federal Savings & Loan Insurance Corp.

      Willard J. Lassers, Alex Elson, and Aaron 8. Wolff for petitioners.

      Solicitor General Griswold for respondent.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 226.
    Silver, Inc., et al. v. Webcor, Inc., et al.

      I. Harvey Levinson, Melvin E. Levinson, and Robert M. Woodward for petitioners.

      Arnold M. Quittner and Miles G. Seeley for respondents International Fastener Research Corp. et al., and William S. Collen for Whiston, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Webcor, Inc., et al.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 227.
    Avella et al. v. United States.

      George R. Sommer for petitioners.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Kirby W. Patterson for the United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 232.
    No. 233.
    Retail Store Employees Union Local 954 v. Lane Drug Co. et al.; and Lane Drug Co. et al. v. National Labor Relations Board et al.

      Joseph E. Finley for petitioner in No. 232.

      Leonard Lane for petitioners in No. 233 and for respondents Lane Drug Co. et al. in No. 232.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, and Norton J. Come for National Labor Relations Board in both cases.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 235.
    Gibraltar Factors Corp. v. Baranow, Trustee in Bankruptcy.

      Sydney Krause for petitioner.

      Marshall S. Marcus for respondent.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 229.
    McFarland v. United States.

      Edward J. Walsh for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Edward Fenig for the United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 234.
    Tonkin Corp. of California, dba Seven-Up Bottling Co. of Sacramento v. National Labor Relations Board.

      Morton B. Jackson for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Gris-wold, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, Norton J. Come, and Elliott Moore for respondent.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 236.
    Connor v. California.
   App. Dept., Super. Ct. Cal., County of Alameda. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 240.
    Seafarers International Union of North America, AFL-CIO, et al. v. Wirtz, Secretary of Labor.

      Howard Schulman and Stephen Kurzman for petitioners.

      Solicitor General Griswold for respondent.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 241.
    Ching-Szu Chen v. Foley, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization Service.

      Bernard E. Bernstein for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, and Beatrice Rosenberg for respondent.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 252.
    Stuyvesant Insurance Co. v. United States.

      Joseph I. Stone for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Robert G. Maysack for the United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 245.
    Taller v. United States.

      Abraham Glosser for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 246.
    Marks v. United States.

      Eugene Gressman and Randall S. Jones for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Rogovin, and Joseph M. Howard for the United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 253.
    Hammond v. Arkansas ex rel. Davis, Sheriff.

      Leon B. Catlett for petitioner.
   Sup. Ct. Ark. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 254.
    Argonaut Savings & Loan Assn. et al. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., Receiver.

      Howard B. Crittenden, Jr., for petitioners.

      Charles A. Legge, S. Rex Lewis, and Leslie H. Fisher for respondent.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 255.
    Brennan et al. v. United States.

      Theodore Rosenberg for petitioners.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Edward Fenig for the United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 259.
    Rhodes, Governor of Ohio, et al. v. Buchanan et al.

      William B. Saxbe, Attorney General of Ohio, and Charles S. Lopeman for petitioners.

      Richard M. Markus for respondents.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 256.
    Cepeda v. Cowles Magazines & Broadcasting, Inc.

      Marvin E. Lewis for petitioner.

      William K. Coblentz for respondent.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 257.
    In re York et ux.

      Robert A. Diemer for petitioners.

      Charles T. Duncan, Hubert B. Pair, and Richard W. Barton in opposition.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 261.
    Klebanoff v. Co-ordinating Committee on Discipline.

      Milton Bard for petitioner.

      Angelo T. Cometa for respondent.
   Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 264.
    No. 275.
    Grow v. United States; and Mensik v. United States.

      Edward P. Morgan and Thomas M. P. Christensen for petitioner in No. 264, and Kinsey T. James for petitioner in No. 275.

      Solicitor General Gris-wold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Kirby W. Patterson for the United States in both cases.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 265.
    Berlin v. Berlin.

      Wilfred R. Caron for petitioner.

      Helen L. Buttenwieser for respondent.
   Ct. App. N. Y. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 276.
    Serv-Air, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board.

      Frank Carter for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, Norton J. Come, and Glen M. Bendixsen for respondent.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 266.
    Florida v. Emelwon, Inc., et al.

      Joe N. Unger for petitioner.

      Al J. Cone for respondents.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 268.
    Burns et al. v. New Mexico et al.

      Joseph A. Calamia for petitioners.

      Boston E. Witt, Attorney General of New Mexico, for respondents.
   Sup. Ct. N. M. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 274.
    Moreali v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board of California et al.

      Arthur L. Johnson for petitioner.

      Everett A. Corten for respondent Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board of California.
   Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 277.
    Montgomery, Executrix, et al. v. Goodyear Aircraft Corp.

      Harry H. Lipsig for petitioners.

      Paul W. Williams, H. Richard Schumacher, and Robert F. Martin for respondent.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 292.
    United Mine Workers of America et al. v. National Labor Relations Board.

      Edward L. Carey, Harrison Combs, Willard Owens, and M. E. Boiarsky for petitioners.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, and Norton J. Come for respondent.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 281.
    Kenner et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Acting Assistant Attorney General Pugh, Gilbert E. Andrews, and Robert J. Campbell for respondent.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 272.
    Beasley et al. v. McFaddin et al.

      Richard H. Cocke for petitioners.

      Major T. Bell, George A. Weller, and Ewell Strong for respondents.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 267.
    Johnson v. New York.

      William H. Oltarsh for petitioner.

      Frank S. Hogan, Michael Juviler, and Michael R. Stack for respondent.
   App. Term, Sup. Ct. N. Y., 1st Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 283.
    Hannah et al. v. United States.

      Joe Stamper for petitioners.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Edward Fenig for the United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 285.
    General Tire & Rubber Co. v. Isocyanate Products, Inc.

      John T. Kelton, Herbert Blecker, and Arthur G. Connolly, Jr., for petitioner.

      C. Walter Mortenson, Charles A. Wei-gel, Jr., Virgil E. Woodcock, and John J. Mackiewicz for respondent.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 287.
    American Pipe & Construction Co. v. California et al.

      Norbert A. Schlei and George W. Jansen for petitioner.

      William H. Ferguson and Charles S. Burdell for respondents.
    [See No. 516, Mise., supra, p. 817.]
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 288.
    Jefferson Construction Co. v. United States.

      Philip M. Cronin for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Weisl, and John C. Eldridge for the United States.
   Ct. Cl. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 289.
    First American Insurance Co. v. O’Connor.

      Joe N. Unger for petitioner.

      J. B. Spence for respondent.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 294.
    Hauff v. United States.

      Daniel C. Ahem for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 295.
    Lothridge et al. v. United States.

      Julius Lucius Echeles for petitioners.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Marshall Tamor Golding for the United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 296.
    Pearce v. United States.

      Philip G. Denman for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Mervyn Hamburg for the United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 300.
    Grisham v. United States.

      Lawrence J. Simmons and H. Clay Espey for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Weisl, John C. Eldridge, and Robert V. Zener for the United States.
   Ct. Cl. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 301.
    LTV Electrosystems, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board.

      Robert T. Thompson for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, Norton J. Come, and Lawrence M. Joseph for respondent.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 299.
    Erwin-Newman Co. v. United States.

      H. Struve Hensel and Harry Cohen for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold for the United States.
   Ct. Cl. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 302.
    Oddo v. United States.

      Nicholas Capuano for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Edward Fenig for the United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 304.
    Southern Blowpipe & Roofing Co. et al. v. Chattanooga Gas Co.

      Sizer Chambliss for petitioners.

      W. D. Spears and Jack Wilson for respondent.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 308.
    Ritter v. United States.

      Daniel M. Gribbon, Brice M. Clagett, and Michael Boudin for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Rogovin, and Philip R. Miller for the United States.
   Ct. Cl. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 309.
    Kubik et al. v. United States.

      Louis M. Kaplan and John P. Diuguid for petitioners.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied..


text:
    No. 310.
    District of Columbia Redevelopment Land Agency v. Nash et ux.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Martz, and Roger P. Marquis for petitioner.

      William T. Hannan for respondents.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 312.
    Crouch, Administratrix v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.

      Milton Heller, Paul Whitehead, Morris Benson, and Arthur Meisnere for petitioner.

      Henry M. Sackett, Jr., and Aubrey R. Bowie's, Jr., for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. App. Va. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 313.
    Graham v. Colon.

      Joseph T. Helling for petitioner.

      Roland Obenchain, Jr., for respondent.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 316.
    Edwards v. United States.

      J. B. Tietz for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson.

      Beatrice Rosenberg, and Paul C. Summitt for the United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 318.
    Vance Trucking Co., Inc., et al. v. Canal Insurance Co. et al.

      W. Francis Marion and O. G. Calhoun for petitioners.

      Wesley M. Walker for respondents Canal Insurance Co. et al.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 319.
    Rao v. United States.

      Edward Bennett Williams for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Mervyn Hamburg for the United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 341.
    Estate of Freeland et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

      George T. Altman and Adam Y. Bennion for petitioners.

      Solicitor General Griswold and Assistant Attorney General Rogovin for respondent.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 321.
    Hart v. Hedrick, Trustee in Bankruptcy.

      James H. Tucker for petitioner.

      David W. Hedrick, respondent, pro se.

   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 327.
    Jacobs v. Toledo Bar Assn.

      Rankin M. Gibson for petitioner.

      Charles E. Ide, Jr., for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 328.
    Webb v. City of Lynchburg.

      Paul Whitehead and Frank M. McCann for petitioner.
   Sup. Ct. App. Va. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 331.
    Euclid National Bank v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board et al.

      Bingham W. Zellmer for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold for respondents.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 333.
    Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. Allied Air Freight International Corp.

      Fowler Hamilton and George Weiss for petitioner.

      Milton Horowitz for respondent.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 336.
    Lysczyk v. United States.

      Robert I. Ferina for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 339.
    Miller v. United States.

      William C. Erbecker for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Kirby W. Patterson for the United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 334.
    Mizner v. Mizner.

      Richard C. Minor for petitioner.
   Sup. Ct. Nev. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 340.
    Breeland v. United States.

      G. Wray Gill, Sr., for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 342.
    Henry, Reformatory Superintendent v. Cotner.

      John J. Dillon, Attorney General of Indiana, Douglas B. McFadden, Assistant Attorney General, and Rex P. Killian, Deputy Attorney General, for petitioner.

      William C. Erbecker for respondent.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 345.
    Gray et al. v. Department of Highways of Louisiana et al.

      Thomas C. Hall for petitioners.
   Sup. Ct. La. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 346.
    MacDougall, Corrections Director, et al. v. Bailey.

      Daniel R. McLeod, Attorney General of South Carolina, and Edward B. Latimer, Assistant Attorney General, for petitioners.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 354.
    Hansen, dba H. J. Hansen & Co. v. Securities and Exchange Commission.

      Mark P. Friedlander, Mark P. Fried-lander, Jr., and Blaine P. Friedlander for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Philip A. Loomis, Jr., David Ferber, and Donald M. Feuerstein for respondent.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 351.
    Mike Roberts Color Productions, Inc. v. Colourpicture Publishers, Inc.

      Edward B. Gregg and William G. MacKay for petitioner.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 353.
    Ratcliff v. Bruce et al.

      Crawford C. Martin, Attorney General of Texas, Nola White, First Assistant Attorney General, A. J. Carubbi, Executive Assistant Attorney General, and /. C. Davis and John H. Banks, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondents.
   Sup. Ct. Tex. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 359.
    Graham v. Greene, Judge, et al.

      Charles T. Duncan, Hubert B. Pair, Richard W. Barton, and David P. Sutton for Greene et al., and Solicitor General Griswold for Murphy et al., respondents.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 363.
    Brotherhood of Railway, Airline & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station Employes et al. v. National Mediation Board et al.

      Edward J. Hickey, Jr., James L. Highsaw, Jr., and William J. D onion for petitioners.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Weisl, and John C. Eldridge for National Mediation Board et al., and David Previant and Herbert S. Thatcher for International Brotherhood of Teamsters, respondents.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 365.
    Holahan, Trustee, et al. v. Henderson et al.

      George C. Connolly, Jr., for petitioners.

      John L. Pitts and Grove Stafford, Jr., for respondent Henderson, and Robert B. Neblett, Jr., for respondent Coleman.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 361.
    Equitable Life Insurance Co. v. National Labor Relations Board.

      Joseph F. Cdstiello for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, and Norton J. Come for respondent.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 362.
    Schmidt v. McCarthy et al.

      Cornelius H. Doherty for petitioner.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 371.
    Low v. United States.

      Saul Grayson for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Marshall Tamor Golding for the United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 381.
    Minichello et al. v. Camp, Comptroller of the Currency, et al.

      Anthony C. Falvello and Arthur D. Dalessandro for petitioners.

      Solicitor General Griswold for respondent Camp.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 385.
    Paxton v. Kansas.

      Elwaine F. Pomeroy for petitioner.

      Robert C. Londerholm, Attorney General of Kansas, and Edward G. Collister, Jr., for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Kan. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 55.
    Peyton, Penitentiary Superintendent v. Coles.

      Robert Y. Button, Attorney General of Virginia, and Reno S. Harp III, Assistant Attorney General, for petitioner.

      James R. Moore for respondent.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


author: Mr. Justice Black,

text:
    No. 82.
    Morris v. Florida.

      Richard Kanner for petitioner.

      Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and Charles W. Musgrove, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 4th Dist. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Black,

with whom Mr. Justice Douglas joins, dissenting.

By denying certiorari in this case, the Court once again sanctions the practice of automatically depriving plaintiffs of their lawsuits or defendants of their defenses merely because their lawyers have failed to file some paper within the time required by Court rules. This is a form of vicarious punishment against which I have frequently protested in both civil and criminal cases, but in vain. See, e. g., Santana v. United States, 385 U. S. 848 (1966); Pittsburgh Towing Co. v. Barge Line, 385 U. S. 32, 33 (1966); Beaufort Concrete Co. v. Atlantic States Construction Co., 384 U. S. 1004 (1966); Lord v. Helmandollar, 383 U. S. 928 (1966); Riess v. Murchison, 383 U. S. 946 (1966); Berman v. United States, 378 U. S. 530 (1964); Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U. S. 626, 636 (1962). See also my dissent from this Court’s order transmitting to Congress Amendments to the Federal Rules, 383 U. S. 1031, 1032 (1966).

This is a criminal case, where the petitioner’s retained attorney filed a timely notice of appeal. Petitioner then hired a new lawyer to handle the appeal. Later, the State moved to dismiss the appeal for failure to prosecute, notifying the defense attorney but not the petitioner who had been convicted. Petitioner’s lawyer failed to take any further action, and the court dismissed the appeal with prejudice, thereby depriving petitioner of his right to appellate review. Although petitioner never did receive notice from his lawyer or from the court, when he learned that his case had been dismissed, he quickly asked the court to reinstate it, explaining that he had never been advised that the appeal was not being actively prosecuted or that the State had moved to dismiss it, and stating that he had now retained a new attorney who was prepared to proceed promptly with the appeal. The court, without ever giving the defendant the benefit of an opinion to explain its action, denied his motion. Now this Court refuses to review and hold that this defendant should be given the benefit of the first and most important rule of due process, which requires notice to a person before he is deprived of his liberty or his property. I would grant certiorari and hold that since Florida provides a right of appeal to criminal defendants in general, it is required to give this defendant an appellate review before he is stigmatized as a criminal.

Of course, the average litigants, who rarely get into court, are not well acquainted with the qualifications of lawyers and they may select poor ones. Even so, there is a vast difference between, on the one hand, holding the litigant responsible for errors in not objecting to evidence or pleadings, and, on the other hand, holding the litigant responsible for complete failure to file papers and then without notice to the litigant dismissing his entire case or defense. When a litigant hires a lawyer who has a state license to practice, he certainly has no reason to suspect that the State will reach into his pocket and make him pay money or take away his valuable cause of action because of his lawyer’s neglect.

Many people justify such state action by saying that the litigant can sue his lawyer for malpractice. But there is a long distance between filing a malpractice suit and winning a damage award against an attorney for malpractice. Nor should courts render a judgment based on the idea that although they do a wrong to a litigant, he can be recompensed by a suit against his lawyer. There is a much simpler solution to this problem than malpractice lawsuits. Instead of holding a litigant responsible in a civil or criminal case for the mistakes of his lawyer, the courts can merely give the litigant notice of his lawyer’s defaults and an opportunity to get a new lawyer to present his case. I would grant certiorari and reverse.


text:
    No. 94.
    Acree et al. v. Air Line Pilots Assn. et al.

      Thomas L. Garter, Jr., and Warren S. Gritzmacher for petitioners.

      Samuel J. Cohen for Air Line Pilots Assn., and W. Glen Harlan, E. Smythe Gam-brell, and Charles A. Moye, Jr., for Eastern Air Lines, Inc., respondents.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 98.
    Amell et al. v. United States.

      Lee Pressman and David Scribner for petitioners.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Weisl, Alan S. Rosenthal, and Robert E. Kopp for the United States.
   Ct. Cl. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 119.
    Kapatos v. United States.

      Julius Lucius Echeles for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Robert G. Maysack for the United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 141.
    Cohen v. New York.

      Abraham Glosser for petitioner.

      Aaron E. Koota and William I. Siegel for respondent.
   Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 136.
    Perez et al. v. California.

      McPherson Berrien E. Moore and Hiram W. Kwan for petitioners.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 290.
    Crown Coat Front Co., Inc. v. United States.

      Edwin J. McDermott for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Weisl, and Alan S. Rosenthal for the United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 108.
    Morgan v. United States.

      Julian Herndon, Jr., for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 120.
    Palmisano et al. v. Baltimore County Welfare Board.

      Louis Peregoff for petitioners.

      R. Bruce Alderman, Harris James George, and Jean G. Rogers for respondent.
   Ct. App. Md. Certiorari denied.

The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 139.
    Remenyi v. Clifford, Secretary of Defense, et al.

      Loyd Wright for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Yeagley, Kevin T. Maroney, and Lee B. Anderson for respondents.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 122.
    Tormey v. Immigration and Naturalization Service.

      John J. Abt for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, and Philip R. Monahan for respondent.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 133.
    Fultz v. Ohio.

      Richard J. Morr for petitioner.

      Melvin G. Rueger and Leonard Kirschner for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 164.
    Dawkins et al. v. Florida.

      Murray A. Gordon for petitioners. Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and Raymond L. Marky and George R. Georgieff, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.
   Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 1st Dist. and/or Sup. Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 177.
    Loschi et al. v. Massachusetts Port Authority.

      Vincent J. Celeste for petitioners.

      Warren F. Farr for respondent.
   Sup. Jud. Ct. Mass. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 203.
    Thoresen v. Maine.

      Melvin W. Miller for petitioner.

      James S. Erwin, Attorney General of Maine, and John W. Benoit, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   Sup. Jud. Ct. Me. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 373.
    Todd v. Frankel, Guardian.

      Norman Paul Harvey for petitioner.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 219.
    Rosado v. Flood, Warden.

      Irving Anolik for petitioner.

      William Cahn and George Danzig Levine for respondent.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 225.
    Meacham, dba “Barbary Coast” v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control of California.

      McPherson Berrien E. Moore for petitioner.

      Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, and Kenneth Scholtz, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
   Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 320.
    Owens v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.

      Otto B. Mullinax for petitioner.

      Luther Hudson for respondent.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 348.
    In re Thoresen.

      John P. Frank, John J. Flynn, and Peyton Ford for petitioner.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Certio-rari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 143.
    Bruns, Nordeman & Co. v. American National Bank & Trust Co. et al.

      David J. Colton and Spencer Pinkham for petitioner.

      Lawrence Gunnels for respondent American National Bank & Trust Co.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Black dissents.


text:
    No. 147.
    Ferrell et al. v. Dallas Independent School District et al.

      Marvin Menaker for petitioners.

      Franklin E. Spafford for respondents.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas,

dissenting.

It comes as a surprise that in a country where the States are restrained by an Equal Protection Clause, a person can be denied education in a public school because of the length of his hair. I suppose that a nation bent on turning out robots might insist that every male have a crew cut and every female wear pigtails. But the ideas of “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness,” expressed in the Declaration of Independence, later found specific definition in the Constitution itself, including of course freedom of expression and a wide zone of privacy. I had supposed those guarantees permitted idiosyncrasies to flourish, especially when they concern the image of one’s personality and his philosophy toward government and his fellow men.

Municipalities furnish many services to their inhabitants; and I had supposed that it would be an invidious discrimination to withhold fire protection, police protection, garbage collection, health protection, and the like merely because a person was an offbeat nonconformist when it came to hairdo and dress as well as to diet, race, religion, or his views on Vietnam.

I would grant the petition for certiorari in this Texas case and put it down for argument.


text:
    No. 298.
    Vaughn v. Municipal Court, Los Angeles Judicial District.

      Frank D. Reeves for petitioner.

      John H. Larson for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Motion to dispense with printing petition granted. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 349.
    Thoresen v. Goodwin, U. S. District Judge.

      John P. Frank, John J. Flynn, and Peyton Ford for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Mervyn Hamburg for respondent.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 184.
    Arkansas Valley G & T, Inc., et al. v. Federal Power Commission et al.

      Wallace L. Duncan, Stephen A. West, and J. A. Riggins, Jr., for petitioners.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Peter H. Schiff, and William H. Arkin for respondent Federal Power Commission; Reuben Goldberg for respondent Minnkota Power Cooperative, Inc.; and William C. Wise for respondents Committee of Rural Electric Cooperatives et al.

      Raphael J. Moses and John J. Conway for Tri-State Generation & Transmission Association, Inc., as amicus curiae, in support of the petition.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Motion of Tri-State Generation & Transmission Association, Inc., for leave to file a brief, as amicus curiae, granted. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 149.
    Courtney v. United States.

      F. Conger Fawcett for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Sidney M. Glazer for the United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Motion to dispense with printing petition granted. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 211.
    North Carolina v. Logner.

      Daniel K. Edwards for petitioner.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Black is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted and judgment reversed.


text:
    No. 132.
    Yuen Kam Chuen et al. v. Esperdy, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization Service.

      Abraham Lebenkoff and Jules E. Coven for petitioners.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Kirby W. Patterson for respondent.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 210.
    Parman v. United States.

      Daniel A. Rezneck for petitioner. Solicitor General Gris-wold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 311.
    Conley Electronics Corp., dba Teleprompter of Liberal, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission et al.

      John P. Cole, Jr., and Alan Raywid for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Zimmerman, Howard E. Shapiro, Henry Getter, and John H. Conlin for respondents.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 303.
    No. 322.
    Parks v. Simpson Timber Co. et al.; and Simpson Timber Co. v. Parks et al.

      Eugene Gressman for petitioner in No. 303.

      Kenneth E. Roberts and Albert Brick for petitioner in No. 322 and for respondent Simpson Timber Co. in No. 303.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Motion in No. 303 to use record in No. 1335, October Term, 1966, granted. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 337.
    Time, Inc., et al. v. Bon Air Hotel, Inc.

      Harold R. Medina, Jr., for petitioners.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Black,

with whom Mr. Justice Douglas concurs,

dissenting.

I would grant certiorari in this case and hold that the petitioners, Time, Inc., and Dan Jenkins, were entitled to summary judgment since, for the reasons stated in the separate opinions of Mr. Justice Douglas and myself in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U. S. 254, 293; Rosenblatt v. Baer, 383 U. S. 75, 94; and Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts, 388 U. S. 130, 170, I believe that a libel judgment against these petitioners is forbidden by the First Amendment’s guarantee that freedom of the press shall not be abridged, a guarantee made applicable to the States by the Fourteenth Amendment. This constitutional bar would apply to any state of facts that might be shown at the trial of this case. I believe the First Amendment was intended to leave the press free from the harassment and expense of suits such as this.


text:
    No. 214.
    White v. Evansville American Legion Home Assn.

      Theodore Loekyear for petitioner.

      Frederick P. Bamberger for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Ind. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Black dissents from the denial of the petition for writ of certiorari.


text:
    No. 314.
    Ray v. Seaboard Air Line Railroad Co.

      James F. Lang and William N. Avera for petitioner. John S. Cox for respondent.
   Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Black dissents from the denial of certiorari in this case; he would grant certiorari and reverse summarily, believing it was clearly error to grant summary judgment against petitioner.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


text:
    No. 350.
    Haines v. Southern Pacific Co.

      Rex E. Lee for petitioner.

      Ralph W. Bilby for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Ariz. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Black dissents from denial of certiorari; he would grant certiorari and set the case down for oral argument.


text:
    No. 367.
    Utah Pie Co. v. Continental Baking Co. et al.

      Joseph L. Alioto, Matthew P. Mitchell, and Robert W. Hughes for petitioner.

      John H. Schafer for Continental Baking Co.; Peter W. Billings and James R. Baird, Jr., for Carnation Co.; and George P. Lamb, Carrington Shields, John P. Lipscomb, and Gene Mayfield for Pet Milk Co., respondents.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.

The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 8,
    Misc.
    O’Halloran v. Rundle, Correctional Superintendent.

      Michael J. Rotko and Arlen Specter for respondent.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 9,
    Misc.
    Morales v. California.

      Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Albert W. Harris, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, and Gloria F. DeHart, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
   Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 25,
    No. 26,
    No. 27,
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Napier v. United States; Cowart v. United States; and Skipper v. United States.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
   C. A. 5th

Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 12,
    Mise.
    Johnson et al. v. California.

      Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and James H. Kline, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
   Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 14,
    Mise.
    Schweininger v. New York.

      George J. Aspland and John Copertino for respondent.
   Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 15,
    Mise.
    Laudermilk v. California.

      Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and Jack K. Weber, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 17,
    Mise.
    Sessions v. Pennsylvania.

      Michael J. Rotko and Arlen Specter for respondent.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 18,
    Mise.
    Agosto v. Alaska.
   Sup. Ct. Alaska. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 19,
    Mise.
    Ford v. New Jersey.
   Sup. Ct. N. J.

Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 20,
    Mise.
    Clarke v. Wisconsin.

      Bronson C. La Follette, Attorney General of Wisconsin, and David J. Cannon for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Wis. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 24,
    Mise.
    Rensing v. New York.

      Aaron E. Koota and Stanley M. Meyer for respondent.
   Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 21,
    Mise.
    Peters v. Louisiana.

      Bertrand De Blanc for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. La. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 28,
    Mise.
    Banks v. Craven, Warden.

      Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Doris H. Maier, Assistant Attorney General, and Nelson P. Kempsky, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 29,
    Mise.
    Martin v. United States.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 30,
    Mise.
    Cindle v. Oklahoma.

      G. T. Blankenship, Attorney General of Oklahoma, and Hugh H. Collum, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   Ct. Crim. App. Okla. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 31,
    Mise.
    Torres v. California.

      Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and Edward J. Horowitz, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
   Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 32,
    Mise.
    Crawford v. Beto, Corrections Director.

      William E. Gray for petitioner. Crawford C. Martin, Attorney General of Texas, Nob, White, First Assistant Attorney General, A. J. Carubbi, Jr., Executive Assistant Attorney General, and Robert C. Flowers and Alio B. Crow, Jr., Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 33,
    Mise.
    Whited v. Nebraska.

      Clarence A. H. Meyer, Attorney General of Nebraska, and H. G. Hamilton, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Neb. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 34,
    Mise.
    Almeida v. Rundle, Warden.

      Herbert G. Keene, Jr., for petitioner.

      Michael J. Rotko and Arlen Specter for respondent.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 35,
    Mise.
    Boyd v. Texas.

      Charles W. Tessmer for petitioner.

      Crawford C. Martin, Attorney General of Texas, Nola White, First Assistant Attorney General, A. J. Carubbi, Jr., Executive Assistant Attorney General, and Robert C. Flowers and Lonny F. Zwiener, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.
   Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 36,
    Mise.
    King v. Tennessee.

      George F. McCanless, Attorney General of Tennessee, and Thomas E. Fox, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
   Sup. Ct. Tenn. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 37,
    Mise.
    Hanks v. United States.

      Kenneth K. Simon for petitioner.

      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Kirby W. Patterson for the United States.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.