text:
    June 14, 2004
    No. 03-284.
    Societe Nationale des Chemins de Fer Francais v. Abrams et al.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Republic of Austria v. Altmann, 541 U. S. 677 (2004).


source: Caselaw Access Project

license: Public Domain

text:
    No. 03-500. No. 03-517.
    Republic of Austria et al. v. Whiteman et al.; and Republic of Poland et al. v. Garb et al.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and cases remanded for further consideration in light of Republic of Austria v. Altmann, 541 U. S. 677 (2004).


text:
    No. 03-741.
    Hwang Geum Joo et al. v. Japan.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Republic of Austria v. Altmann, 541 U. S. 677 (2004).


text:
    No. 03-1348.
    Ko v. New York.
   App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y, 1st Jud. Dept. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Crawford v. Washington, 541 U. S. 36 (2004).


text:
    No. 03-9788.
    Martin v. Nebraska Board of Parole.
   Ct. App. Neb. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8.


text:
    No. 03-10241.
    Ortloff v. Fleming, Warden.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8.


text:
    No. 02-10038.
    Tennard v. Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to file supplemental brief after argument granted.


text:
    No. 03-409.
    KP Permanent Make-Up, Inc. v. Lasting Impression I, Inc., et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted.


text:
    No. 03-878.
    No. 03-7434.
    Crawford, Interim Field Office Director, Portland, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, et al. v. Suarez Martinez. and Benitez v. Mata, Interim Field Office Director, Miami, Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
   C. A. 9th Cir.

C. A. 11th Cir. Motion of respondent Suarez Martinez and petitioner Benitez for divided argument granted. Request for additional time for oral argument denied.


text:
    No. 03-9345.
    Owen v. Florida.
   Sup. Ct. Fla. Motion of petitioner to defer consideration of petition for writ of certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 03-10442.
    No. 03-10508.
    No. 03-10510.
    In re Carroll; In re Miller; and In re Rhett.
   Petitions for writs of habeas corpus denied.


text:
    No. 03-10478.
    In re Bailey.
   Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of habeas corpus dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).

Justice Stevens dissents.

See id., at 4, and cases cited therein.


text:
    No. 03-9751.
    In re Bellon.
   Petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition denied.


text:
    No. 03-10175.
    In re Morrison.
   Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of mandamus dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). See id,., at 4, and cases cited therein.

Justice Stevens dissents.


text:
    No. 02-1672.
    Jackson v. Birmingham Board of Education.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 03-1423.
    Muehler et al. v. Mena.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of Police Officers Research Association of California Legal Defense Fund for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 03-8661.
    Smith v. Massachusetts.
   App. Ct. Mass. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 03-201.
    Clayton Hospitality Group, Inc. v. Orange County, Florida, et al.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1159.
    Skwira, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Skwira, et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1281.
    Town of Islip, New York, et al. v. Norton.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1288.
    Holmes v. Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs, Department of Labor, et al.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1298.
    Williams v. Devell R. Young, M. D., P. C., et al.
   Ct. App. Ga. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1314.
    Lurie v. Blackwell, Liquidating Trustee of the Popkin & Stern Liquidating Trust.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1343.
    Johnson v. Orange County, Florida.
   Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 5th Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1390.
    Waste Recovery Enterprises, LLC v. Town of Unadilla, New York, et al.
   App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 3d Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1405.
    Hotel & Motel Association of Oakland et al. v. City of Oakland, California.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1411.
    Doe, Individually and as Guardian ad Litem for Doe, a Minor, et al. v. Lebbos et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1412.
    Coastal Petroleum Co. et al. v. Florida Department of Environmental Protection et al.
   Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1421.
    United States ex rel. Goldstein v. Fabri-care Draperies, Inc., et al.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1422.
    DeGidio v. West Group Corp. et al.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1468.
    Lakin Law Firm, P. C. v. Federal Trade Commission.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1476.
    McGregor v. Mineta, Secretary of Transportation.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1486.
    Northern Voyager Limited Partnership et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1489.
    Carroll v. Potter, Postmaster General, et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1491.
    Thames Shipyard & Repair Co. v. United States.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1493.
    Doe v. United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certio-rari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1494.
    Jackson v. Department of Justice et al.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1516.
    Wyatt et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1539.
    King v. United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certio-rari denied.


text:
    No. 03-8444.
    Jennings v. United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-8622.
    Harrington v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.
   Ct. App. Minn. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-8804.
    CONROD v. Moore et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-8808.
    Jones v. Texas.
   Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Certio-rari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9167.
    Simpson v. Texas.
   Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9274.
    Raby v. Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9323.
    Dunn v. United States.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9333.
    Overby v. Pennsylvania.
   Sup. Ct, Pa. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9351.
    Aguilera-De Flores v. United States; and Jalomo-Gallo v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9715.
    Turner v. Horn et al.
   Sup. Ct. Pa. Certio-rari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9716.
    Brown v. Scott et al.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9717.
    Mackey v. Illinois.
   App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9735.
    Dalal v. Ozmint, Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections, et al.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9736.
    O’Neal v. Hammer et al.
   Sup. Ct. Haw. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9745.
    Lee v. California.
   Ct. App. Cal., 6th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9747.
    Jon v. Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9749.
    Johnson v. Marshall et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9758.
    Rogers v. Rose, Warden.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9760.
    Johnson v. Alameida, Director, California Department of Corrections.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9763.
    Chapin v. Fernald, Warden, et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9764.
    Trinidad v. Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9766.
    Cathron v. Jones, Warden.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9771.
    Lollar v. Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9781.
    Brown v. Williams, Warden.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9782.
    Scott v. Ohio.
   Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9785.
    Kalinowski v. Bond et al.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9789.
    Duenas v. Galaza, Warden, et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9795.
    Jackson v. Johnson, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9797.
    Scott v. Louisiana.
   Ct. App. La., 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9798.
    Smith v. Berry.
   Ct. App. Tex., 14th Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9801.
    McQueen v. Kemna, Superintendent, Crossroads Correctional Center.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9806.
    Belton v. Turner et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9810.
    Sudduth, aka Muhammad v. Strassburger et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9813.
    Mathis v. Pennsylvania.
   Super. Ct. Pa. Cer-tiorari denied.'


text:
    No. 03-9814.
    Shoyinka v. City of Los Angeles, California.
   Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9818.
    McLaurin v. Yarborough, Warden.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9820.
    Stampone v. Kearfott Guidance & Navigation Corp. et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9829.
    Hassink v. Gansheimer, Warden.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9831.
    Hodge et al. v. Giant Food Inc. et al.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9833.
    Biros v. Bradshaw, Warden.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9834.
    Evans v. Hamrick et al.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9836.
    McGee v. Mote, Warden.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9841.
    President v. Stalder, Secretary, Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections, et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9842.
    Lindsey v. Colorado.
   Ct. App. Colo. Certio-rari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9843.
    Justice v. Superior Court of California, San Diego County.
   Ct. App. Cal., 4th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9844.
    Angel v. Texas.
   Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Certio-rari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9848.
    Gordon et al. v. Alabama et al.
   Sup. Ct. Ala. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9849.
    Martin v. Hernandez, Warden.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9850.
    Kissane v. Jones, Warden.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9864.
    Hicks v. Head, Warden.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9878.
    Sigala v. Texas.
   Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Certio-rari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9896.
    Mays v. Straub, Warden.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9953.
    Howard v. Hillsborough County Sheriff’s Department.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9963.
    Austin v. Gillis, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Coal Township, et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9972.
    Posey v. California.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10005.
    Williams v. Rowley, Superintendent, Missouri Eastern Correctional Center.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10013.
    Quevado v. Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense, et al.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10014.
    Everett v. Pennsylvania et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10022.
    Lewis v. Johnson, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10036.
    Bushard v. Yukins, Warden.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10073.
    Gale v. Vaughn, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Graterford.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10090.
    Davis v. Waldron, Clerk, United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10113.
    Molineaux v. West Virginia.
   Sup. Ct. App. W. Va. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10133.
    Tomlin v. Schriro, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10145.
    Locklear v. North Carolina.
   Ct. App. N. C. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10167.
    Attia v. Social Security Administration et al.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10194.
    Guy v. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10212.
    Grant v. United States.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10219.
    Ward v. United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10226.
    Casey v. Lavan, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Dallas, et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10231.
    Arevalo v. United States.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10236.
    Watkins v. United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10239.
    Burr v. United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10244.
    Crayton, aka Harris, aka Winters v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10247.
    Concepcion v. United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10248.
    Willis v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10250.
    Bonilla v. United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10251.
    Smith v. United States.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10252.
    Sanders v. United States.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10254.
    DeCato v. Executive Office for United States Attorneys.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10256.
    Carter v. United States et al.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10258.
    Burnett v. United States.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10262.
    Jimenez-Velasco v. United States; Gonzalez v. United States; Hinojosa-Aguirre v. United States; Del Bosque v. United States; Lozano-Tamez v. United States; Quiroz-Escobedo v. United States; and Campos Madrigal v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10264.
    Peveler v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10265.
    Medina-Anicacio v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10266.
    Monsibais-Tovias v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10267.
    Rojas Afanador v. United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10269.
    Williams v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10271.
    Welch v. United States.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10272.
    Newsome v. United States Martin v. United States Chimney v. United States Songalia Flores v. United States; Villarreal-Medina v. United States Abney v. United States Guerrero v. United States Aguilar-Cortez v. United States Avila-Chavez v. United States Hernandez-Hernandez v. United States De Los Santos v. United States Medina-Teniente v. United States and De Luna-Vigil v. United States
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10273.
    Miranda v. United States.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10274.
    Coleman v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10275.
    Epps v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.*


text:
    No. 03-10276.
    Cardenas-Gutierrez v. United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10277.
    Ruddock v. United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10278.
    Salceda-Guerrero v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10282.
    Jones v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10287.
    Stephens v. United States.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10291.
    Wright v. United States.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10292.
    Terrell v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10293.
    Burke, aka Hakimi v. United States.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10294.
    Alexander v. United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10295.
    Merichko v. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10297.
    Reid v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10299.
    Lampkin v. United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10303.
    Rice v. United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10306.
    Eldridge v. United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10312.
    Nix v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certio-rari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10313.
    Montgomery v. United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10314.
    Lawrence v. United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10318.
    Price v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10319.
    Smythe v. United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10320.
    Adams v. United States.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10322.
    Neal v. United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10324.
    Berry v. United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10326.
    Amado-Nunez v. United States.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10329.
    Hernandez v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10330.
    Hernandez-Puga v. United States; Cruz-Duran v. United States; and Teran-Gomez v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10338.
    Carter v. United States et al.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10344.
    McFarlane v. United States.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10346.
    Walker, aka Smith v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10347.
    Brown v. United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10350.
    Persaud v. United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10362.
    Springer et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10365.
    Spykes v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10366.
    Hays v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10367.
    Gomez-Valdez v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10368.
    Gaines v. United States.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10370.
    Beard v. United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10374.
    Delgado-Romero v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10377.
    Florence v. Gallegos, Warden.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10380.
    Hupp v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10386.
    Gibson v. United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10388.
    Hickman v. United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10392.
    Green v. United States.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10417.
    McDonnell v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10421.
    Longoria-Contreras v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1147.
    Roeder, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, et al. v. Islamic Republic of Iran et al.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Motion of George Allen et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1282.
    Healthplan Services, Inc., et al. v. Gunnells et al.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Motions of National Home Equity Mortgage Association and Chamber of Commerce of the United States for leave to file briefs as amici curiae granted. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 01-8625.
    No. 03-1035.
    No. 03-1249.
    No. 03-1278.
    No. 03-8446.
    No. 03-8583.
    No. 03-8691.
    No. 03-8895.
    No. 03-8928.
    No. 03-8984.
    No. 03-9068.
    No. 03-9113.
    No. 03-9293.
    No. 03-9302.
    No. 03-9499.
    No. 03-9522.
    No. 03-9759.
    Stroud v. Pollunsky et al., 535 U. S. 1038; Kelso v. United States Defense Intelligence Agency, 540 U. S. 1220; Filoso v. Prince William County School Board, 541 U. S. 1030; Persik v. Colorado State University, 541 U. S. 990; Mott v. Sistrunk, Superintendent, Cross City Correctional Institution, et al., 541 U. S. 945; Bowman v. United States, 540 U. S. 1226; Harvey v. Garcia, Warden, 541 U S. 977; Russell v. Vittands, 541 U. S. 994; Perry v. City of Birmingham, Alabama, et al., 541 U. S. 995; Thompson v. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District, 541 U. S. 996; Fleming v. Brooks, Warden, 541 U. S. 966; West v. Workman, Warden, 541 U. S. 1014; Alder v. Burt, Warden, 541 U. S. 1016; Manley v. Davis, Superintendent, Indiana State Prison, 541 U. S. 999; In re Reynolds, 541 U. S. 986; Munoz v. United States, 541 U. S. 1017; and In re Bellon, 541 U. S. 1029.
   Petitions for rehearing denied.


text:
    No. 03-8397.
    Cooper v. Johnson, Regional Director, Georgia Department of Corrections, et al.
   540 U. S. 1224.

Motion for leave to file petition for rehearing denied.


text:
    June 16, 2004
    No. 03A1023.
    Sizer, Commissioner, Maryland Department of Corrections, et al. v. Oken.
   Application to vacate the stay of execution of sentence of death entered by the United States District Court for the District of Maryland on June 14, 2004, presented to The Chief Justice, and by him referred to the Court, granted.

Justice Stevens, Justice Ginsburg, and Justice Breyer would deny the application to vacate the stay of execution.


text:
    No. 03-10808 (03A1011).
    Oken v. Maryland.
   Ct. App. Md. Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to The Chief Justice, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Certiorari denied.


text:
    June 17, 2004
    No. 03-10888 (03A1031).
    Oken v. Maryland.
   Cir. Ct. Baltimore County, Md. Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to The Chief Justice, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10908 (03A1034).
    Oken v. Maryland.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to The Chief Justice, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Certiorari before judgment denied.

Justice Scalia took no part in the consideration or decision of this application and this petition.


text:
    June 21, 2004
    No. 03-109.
    No. 03-123.
    Veneman, Secretary of Agriculture, et al. v. Montana Wilderness Assn., Inc., et al.; and Blue Ribbon Coalition, Inc., et al. v. Montana Wilderness Assn., Inc., et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certio-rari granted, judgment vacated, and cases remanded for further consideration in light of Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, ante, p. 55.


text:
    No. 03-1015.
    Bank Austria AG et al. v. Sniado et al.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd v. Empadran S. A., ante, p. 155.


text:
    No. 02-1703.
    Utah Shared Access Alliance et al. v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance et al.
   C. A. 10th Cir. The Court reversed the judgment below in Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, ante, p. 55. Therefore, certiorari granted, and case remanded for farther proceedings.


text:
    No. 03-10341.
    Mendez v. United States et al.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8.


text:
    No. 03M80.
    Heriberto C. v. Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services.
   Motion for leave to proceed informa pauperis without an affidavit of indigency executed by petitioner denied.


text:
    No. 03-10035.
    No. 03-10211.
    Nassralah v. Ashcroft, Attorney General. and Reyes v. Verizon Data Services, Inc.
   C. A. 3d Cir.; C. A. 11th Cir. Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioners are allowed until July 12, 2004, within which to pay the docketing fees required by Rule 38(a) and to submit petitions in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.


text:
    No. 03-10608.
    In re Crawford.
   Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.


text:
    No. 03-10481.
    No. 03-10563.
    In re Kirksey; and In re Chambers.
   Petitions for writs of mandamus denied.


text:
    No. 03-1293.
    No. 03-1294.
    Whitfield v. United States; and Hall v. United States.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Cer-tiorari granted, cases consolidated, and a total of one hour allotted for oral argument.


text:
    No. 03-9168.
    Shepard v. United States.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 03-1268.
    City of Anaheim, California, et al. v. Drum-mond, By and Through His Guardian ad Litem, Drummond.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1302.
    Conroy v. Township of Lower Merion, Pennsylvania, et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1322.
    Provenza v. Friend.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certio-rari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1326.
    Hawkins v. United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1327.
    Fanning, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. United States et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1334.
    Imperial County Air Pollution Control District v. Sierra Club et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1426.
    DeKalb County, Georgia v. Prickett et al.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1429.
    4-Mali LLC v. Bankers Insurance Co.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1437.
    Waite v. Hippe et al.
   Ct. App. Neb. Certio-rari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1441.
    Bishop et al. v. New Jersey et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1442.
    Eagle Insurance Co. et al. v. Bankvest Capital Corp.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1444.
    Archdiocese of Milwaukee v. Superior Court of California, Orange County.
   Ct. App. Cal., 4th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1445.
    Regier, Secretary, Florida Department of Children & Families, et al. v. Does 1-13 et al.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1446.
    Romo v. Louisiana.
   Sup. Ct. La. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1447.
    Roe v. Aware Woman Center for Choice, Inc., et al.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1459.
    Opetubo v. Citibank Student Loan Corp. et al.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1460.
    Savage v. Georgia.
   Ct. App. Ga. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1461.
    Avery Dennison Corp. v. 3M Innovative Properties Co. et al.
   C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1463.
    Hood v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1464.
    Infusion Resources, Inc., et al. v. MiniMed, Inc.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1492.
    Coraggioso v. Ashcroft, Attorney General.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1501.
    Solem et al. v. Virginia.
   Sup. Ct. Va. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1508.
    Graves et al., as Personal Representatives of the Estate of Amedure, Deceased v. Warner Brothers et al.
   Sup. Ct. Mich. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1509.
    Goldsberry v. Virginia.
   Sup. Ct. Va. Certio-rari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1513.
    Ray v. Pennsylvania.
   Super. Ct. Pa. Certio-rari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1528.
    Phillips v. Mezera et al.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1530.
    Quintero v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1544.
    Sibley v. Lando, Judge, Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Miami-Dade County, Florida.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1547.
    Passport Video et al. v. Elvis Presley Enterprises, Inc., et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1553.
    Trenkler v. Pugh, Warden.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1558.
    Burton v. Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co. et al.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1573.
    Jones v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir!. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-6324.
    Infante-Cabrera v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-8965.
    Beasley v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9072.
    Adams v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9398.
    Christopher, aka Yisrael v. Town of Yemassee, South Carolina.
   Ct. App. S. C. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9839.
    McLean v. Bohannon et al.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9840.
    Palmer v. Johnson, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9854.
    Moore v. Cahill-Masching, Warden.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 08-9855.
    Yates v. Hines, Warden.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9856.
    Ortiz v. New York.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9859.
    Cook v. Norris, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9860.
    Smith v. Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County.
   Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9863.
    Johnson v. Board, Administrative Judge.
   Sup. Ct. Tex. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9868.
    Turner v. Southeast Atlantic Beverage Corp. et al.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9872.
    Kavic v. Alameida, Director, California Department of Corrections, et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9875.
    Heredia Naranjo v. Yarborough, Warden.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9883.
    Troop v. Wolfe, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Albion.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9890.
    No. 03-9926.
    Caudill v. Kentucky; and Goforth v. Kentucky.
   Sup. Ct. Ky. Certio-rari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9892.
    D’Angelo v. Ratelle, Warden.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9893.
    Edmonson v. Hanks, Superintendent, Wabash Valley Correctional Facility.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certio-rari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9894.
    Beaudoin v. Florida.
   Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 3d Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9897.
    Bowie v. Jordan, Warden.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9898.
    Alve v. California.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9901.
    McCall v. California.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certio-rari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9903.
    Munn v. Crosby, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.
   Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 1st Dist. Certio-rari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9904.
    Manning v. Crosby, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9905.
    Lagarde v. Miller, Warden.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9907.
    O’Hare v. Runnels, Warden.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9908.
    Butler v. Crosby, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9909.
    Wilson v. Ozmint, Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections, et al.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certio-rari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9917.
    Carter v. Lowndes County, Mississippi, et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9925.
    Ybarra Villagrana v. Scribner, Warden.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9927.
    Johnson v. Louisiana.
   Sup. Ct. La. Certio-rari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9928.
    Brewer v. Smith, Superintendent, Shaw-angunk Correctional Facility.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9932.
    King v. Johnson, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9983.
    Brown v. Ohio.
   Ct. App. Ohio, Mahoning County. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9934.
    Bruce v. Kentucky.
   Sup. Ct. Ky. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9974.
    Dorsey v. Yarborough, Warden, et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9988.
    Wallis v. Crosby, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.
   Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 1st Dist. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10004.
    Tompkins v. Kelly, Superintendent, Central Mississippi Correctional Facility.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10016.
    Nasrallah v. Ashcroft, Attorney General.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10024.
    Kidd v. Hooks, Warden, et al.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10027.
    Thorpe v. Grillo et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10039.
    Brown v. Athens Regional Medical Center.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10062.
    DuPont v. Massachusetts.
   App. Ct. Mass. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10082.
    Frazier v. Small, Warden.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10084.
    Grohs v. Crosby, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10101.
    Faty v. Ashcroft, Attorney General.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10104.
    Robinson v. Epps, Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections, et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certio-rari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10110.
    Libecki v. Klauser, Warden.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10119.
    Fears v. Luebbers, Superintendent, Farm-ington Correctional Center.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10120.
    Goolsby v. Florida.
   Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 5th Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10124.
    Garrison v. Illinois.
   App. Ct. Ill., 3d Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10130.
    Hinton v. Illinois.
   App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10162.
    Nordlund v. Washington.
   Ct. App. Wash. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10182.
    Rice v. Illinois.
   App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10199.
    Cashion, as Executrix of the Estate of Smith v. Torbert.
   Sup. Ct. Ala. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10225.
    Cesario v. Bergquist.
   Sup. Ct. R. I. Certio-rari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10232.
    Bennett v. Alabama.
   Ct. Crim. App. Ala. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10300.
    Johnson v. United States.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10327.
    Ingram v. United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10331.
    Brodit v. Goughnour, Acting Warden.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10337.
    Bailey v. North Carolina.
   Ct. App. N. C. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10340.
    Beaumont v. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10359.
    Ai Fa Yang v. United States.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10361.
    McQuistion v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10369.
    Haney v. United States.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied..


text:
    No. 03-10372.
    Maldonado-Canales v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari, denied.


text:
    No. 03-10396.
    Goist v. United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10397.
    Ferreira v. United States.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10399.
    Gregg v. United States.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10400.
    Hugh v. Crosby, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10403.
    Jones v. Tapia, Warden.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10407.
    Williams v. United States.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10408.
    Van Alstyne v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10413.
    Choate v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10415.
    Estrada-Aguiar v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10416.
    Carbajal-Martinez v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10419.
    Phipps v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10420.
    Jewell v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10424.
    Pearson v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.*


text:
    No. 03-10425.
    Acuna-Navarro v. United States.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10427.
    Salas v. United States; and Torres-Vasquez v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.*


text:
    No. 03-10428.
    Sinclair v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10429.
    Robinson v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10430.
    Scheidt v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10432.
    Alegria-Moreno v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10434.
    Jiminez Perez v. Andrews, Administrator, Taft Correctional Institution.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10444.
    Day v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10446.
    Banuelos v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10449.
    Martinez v. United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10451.
    Lujano-Perez v. United States Reyes-Ramirez v. United States Celedon v. United States Flores-Benitez v. United States Contreras-Perez v. United States Salgado-Castro v. United States Reyes-Amaya v. United States Vela-Perez v. United States Garcia-Galiano v. United States Cuellar-Arrellano v. United States Fortuna-Turbiartes v. United States Garcia-Camacho v. United States Marquez-Conde v. United States Blanco-Melgar v. United States Castillo-Hernandez v. United States Barrigas-Valdovinos v. United States Davila-Juarez v. United States Lopez-Martinez v. United States Juaregui-Duran v. United States Gonzalez-Contreras v. United States Perez-Sanchez v. United States Mata-Alvarez v. United States Rodriguez-Tellez v. United States and Hernandez-Herrera v. United States
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10455.
    Villanueva et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10460.
    Gardea-Venegas v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10462.
    Hill v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10463.
    Hernandez-Carrasco v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10467.
    Gonzalez-Alanis v. United States Garcia-Luna v. United States Martinez-Vasquez v. United States Delgado-Genchis v. United States Loyola-Hernandez v. United States Bocanegra-Camarillo v. United States Torres-Perez v. United States Rangel-Orduna v. United States Rodriguez-Hernandez v. United States Salazar-Gonzalez v. United States Yanez-Brillano v. United States Gonzalez-Garcia v. United States Soto-Fuerte v. United States Chavez v. United States Meraz-Sanchez v. United States Saldana-Amanza v. United States Alcaraz-Rodriguez v. United States Rodriguez-Garcia, aka Sustaita-Saenz v. United States Garza-Flores v. United States Leija-Martinez v. United States and Gonzalez-Cora v. United States
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10469.
    Calhoun v. United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10473.
    Petrie v. United States.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10475.
    Allen v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10477.
    Williams v. United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10482.
    Haire v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10483.
    Minor v. United States.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10487.
    Terry v. United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10489.
    Espinoza-Madrid v. United States.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10490.
    Criston v. United States; Perales v. United States; Guerra v. United States; and Salinas v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10491.
    Arzola-Juarez v. United States; and Magallanes-Torres v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10492.
    No. 03-10495.
    Tenorio Juarez v. United States; and Juarez v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10494.
    Amaya-Torres v. United States Giron-Apodaca v. United States Olvera-Bermudez v. United States Tapia-Carreno v. United States Gomez-Celis v. United States Chavez-Ramirez v. United States Reyes-Flores v. United States Gonzalez-Chavez v. United States Frias-Salazar v. United States Lopez-Huerta v. United States Mazariegos v. United States Ponce-Martinez v. United States Puentes-Romero v. United States Baez Tovar v. United States and Zapata-Aguilar v. United States
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10499.
    Avalos-Lumbreras v. United States De Hoyos-Garcia v. United States Duque-Restrepo v. United States Frayre-Salas v. United States Garcia-Castro v. United States Gonzalez-Apodaca v. United States Grajeda-Zamorano v. United States Hernandez-Sosa v. United States Juarez-Sanchez v. United States Lopez-Mercado v. United States Negrete-Alba v. United States Punay-Beltran v. United States Rios-Quintero v. United States and Ronquillo-Barraza v. United States
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10500.
    Weathersby v. United States.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10501.
    Rothewell v. United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10507.
    Turner v. United States.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10514.
    Daniels v. United States.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10516.
    Beal v. United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10518.
    Griggs v. Fleming, Warden.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10520.
    Harris v. United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10522.
    Muniz-Solis v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10524.
    Cordell v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10525.
    Campbell v. United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10526.
    Doe v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certio-rari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10529.
    Shepherd v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10530.
    Valadez Soto v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.*


text:
    No. 03-10532.
    Salinas-Romo v. United States Rios-Elias v. United States Mendoza-Barcenas v. United States Morin-Davila v. United States Salazar-Martinez v. United States Quintanilla-Ramirez v. United States Castellano v. United States Rodriguez v. United States Ventura, aka Garcia-Castillo v. United States Torres-Gonzalez v. United States Medina-Saldana v. United States Ramirez-Garcia, aka Hernandez-Garcia v. United States Castillo-Santos v. United States Ortiz-Arellano, aka Ramos-Ochoa, aka Aguilar-Ochoa v. United States Puente-Moreno v. United States Rivas-Sarmiento v. United States Cortez v. United States Martinez-Martinez v. United States Herrera-Mijares, aka Villa-Diaz v. United States Hernandez-Navarro v. United States De La Cerda-Garcia, aka Serna-Gaona v. United States Mendoza-Lopez v. United States Camacho-Orozco v. United States Villegas-Marin v. United States and Rodriguez-Pena v. United States
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10535.
    Bender v. United States.
   C. A: 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10537.
    Thomas v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10544.
    Cortez-Carrasco v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10545.
    Calloway, aka Beasley v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1451.
    Kramer v. Banc of America Securities, LLC.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 03-1456.
    Spencer, Superintendent, Massachusetts Correctional Institution at Norfolk v. Norton.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Motion, of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pau-peris granted. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9913.
    Throumoulos v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 03-1242.
    No. 03-8316.
    No. 03-8780.
    No. 03-9054.
    No. 03-9200.
    No. 03-9217.
    In re Holbrook, 541 U. S. 1029; Weldon v. California, 541 U. S. 909; Chandler v. Smith, Warden, 541 U. S. 991; Ballard v. Braxton, Warden, 541 U. S. 1013; Woodruff v. Maine Department of Human Services, 541 U. S. 1033; and In re Mendez, 541 U. S. 986.
   Petitions for rehearing denied.


text:
    June 28, 2004
    No. 03-69.
    Vytra Healthcare et al. v. Cicio, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Cicio.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Aetna Health Inc. v. Davila, ante, p. 200.


text:
    No. 03-357.
    Adams, Warden, et al. v. Brambles.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Pliler v. Ford, ante, p. 225.


text:
    No. 03-520.
    Pliler, Warden v. Hunt.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Pliler v. Ford, ante, p. 225.


text:
    No. 03-649.
    CIGNA Healthcare of Florida v. Land et ux.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Aetna Health Inc. v. Davila, ante, p. 200.


text:
    No. 03-8659.
    Nelson v. Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Tennard v. Dretke, ante, p. 274.


text:
    No. 03-9412.
    Dilts v. Oregon.
   Sup. Ct. Ore. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Blakely v. Washington, ante, p. 296.


text:
    No. 03-9948.
    Shabazz v. Lamarque, Warden.
   C. A. 9th Cir.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8.


text:
    No. 03M81.
    Taylor v. Prudential Insurance Company of America.
   Motion for leave to file petition for writ of certiorari under seal granted.


text:
    No. 03M82.
    Hartsfield v. Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.
   Motion to direct the Clerk to file petition for writ of certiorari out of time under this Court’s Rule 14.5 denied.


text:
    No. 03M83.
    McCullum v. Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.
   Motion to direct the Clerk to file petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.


text:
    No. 105, Orig.
    Kansas v. Colorado.
   Motion of Solicitor General for divided argument granted. [For earlier order herein, see, c. g., 541 U. S. 1071.]


text:
    No. 02-626.
    South Florida Water Management District v. Miccosukee Tribe of Indians et al., 541 U. S. 95.
   Motion of respondents to retax costs denied.


text:
    No. 02-1028.
    Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. James N. Kirby, Pty Ltd., dba Kirby Engineering, et al.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted.


text:
    No. 03-750.
    Small v. United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Motion of petitioner to dispense with printing the joint appendix granted.


text:
    No. 03-1116.
    No. 03-1120.
    No. 03-1274.
    Granholm, Governor of Michigan, et al. v. Heald et al. Michigan Beer & Wine Wholesalers Assn. v. Heald et al. and Swedenburg et al. v. Kelly, Chairman, New York Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control, State Liquor Authority, et al.
   C. A. 6th Cir.;

C. A. 6th Cir.;

C. A. 2d Cir. Motion for realignment of the parties and to set a briefing schedule denied.


text:
    No. 03-1202. No. 03-1443.
    Hewlett-Packard Company Employee Benefits Organization Income Protection Plan v. Jebian. and Hill v. Lockheed Martin Logistics Management, Inc.
   C. A. 9th Cir.;

C. A. 4th Cir. The Solicitor General is invited to file briefs in these cases expressing the views of the United States.


text:
    No. 03-10531.
    In re Shemonsky.
   Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed informa pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until July 19,2004, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.


text:
    No. 03-10669.
    No. 03-10697.
    No. 03-10730.
    In re Parker; In re Almeyda; and In re Sambrano Villarreal.
   Petitions for writs of habeas corpus denied.


text:
    No. 03-1542.
    No. 03-10233.
    In re Fleming et al.; and In re McMillian.
   Petitions for writs of mandamus denied.


text:
    No. 03-10007.
    In re McCormick.
   Petition for writ of prohibition denied.


text:
    No. 03-388.
    Bates et al. v. Dow Agrosciences LLC.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 03-855.
    City of Sherrill, New York v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York et al.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 03-1395.
    Tenet, Individually and as Director of Central Intelligence and Director of the Central Intelligence Agency, et al. v. Doe et ux.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari granted.


text:
    No. 03-1454.
    Ashcroft, Attorney General, et al. v. Raich et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 03-9046.
    Rhines v. Weber, Warden.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 03-9560.
    Howell, aka Cox v. Mississippi.
   Sup. Ct. Miss. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pau-peris granted. Certiorari granted. In addition to the question presented by the petition, the parties are directed to brief and argue the following question: “Was petitioner’s federal constitutional claim properly raised before the Mississippi Supreme Court for purposes of 28 U. S. C. § 1257?”


text:
    No. 03-9659.
    Miller-El v. Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 03-932.
    Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al. v. Broudo et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of Securities Industry Association for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 02-1864.
    Conover v. Aetna US Healthcare, Inc., et al.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-641.
    Regal Cinemas, Inc., et al. v. Stewmon et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-786.
    Williams v. Benicorp Insurance Co.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1131.
    Cinemark USA, Inc. v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1266.
    Laton v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1313.
    Davis, as Guardian and Next Friend for Davis, et al. v. United States et al.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certio-rari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1339.
    University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey et al. v. Corrigan, Acting Inspector General, Department of Health and Human Services.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1342.
    DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Ysbrand et al., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated.
   Sup. Ct. Okla. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1347.
    Orloff v. Federal Communications Commission et al.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1359.
    Mitchell v. Chapman et al.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1369.
    Baker et al. v. Sunny Chevrolet, Inc., dba Wayland Chevrolet.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1430.
    Sibley v. Sibley.
   Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 3d Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1455.
    Sappington, Judge, Circuit Court of Macon County, Illinois v. Robinson.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1462.
    Egbune v. Colorado.
   Sup. Ct. Colo. Certio-rari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1466.
    No. 03-1467.
    Chase Manhattan Bank, Trustee v. Bascom Cork et al.; and Chase Manhattan Bank, Trustee v. Askew.
   Super. Ct. N. J., App. Div. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1469.
    Jonas v. South Carolina Discount Auto Center.
   Sup. Ct. S. C. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1477.
    Gesiorski et ux. v. Branch Banking & Trust Co., fka Carroll County Bank & Trust.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1478.
    Gouin v. Gould, Associate Justice, Massachusetts Probate and Family Court Department, Suffolk County Division, et al.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1479.
    Gallegos v. Jicarilla Apache Nation et al.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1483.
    Rahn v. Kaps et al.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1484.
    Yee v. Court of Appeals of Michigan.
   Ct. App. Mich. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1497.
    Saudi v. Marine Transport Lines, Inc., et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1525.
    Ford v. New York City Transit Authority et al.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1526.
    Hocking Valley Community Hospital v. Edwards et al.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1531.
    Anderson v. Pearson et al.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1556.
    Macy v. Kentucky.
   Cir. Ct. Hopkins County, Ky. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1580.
    Maldonado v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1589.
    Spitzer, Attorney General of New York v. Mateo et al.
   Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1591.
    Larson v. United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1606.
    Paul Revere Life Insurance Co. et al. v. Greenberg.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-7361.
    Lotter v. Nebraska.
   Sup. Ct. Neb. Certio-rari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9006.
    Knight v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9036.
    Marquez-Urquidi v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9118.
    Champney v. Pennsylvania.
   Sup. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9215.
    Wills, aka Short v. United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9273.
    Sansing v. Arizona.
   Sup. Ct. Ariz. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9402.
    Rideout v. United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9519.
    Stroman v. Texas.
   Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9920.
    Bell v. California.
   Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9922.
    Stringham et al. v. Titsworth et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9941.
    Martinez v. Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9942.
    Young v. Phillips, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9943.
    Allen, aka Ali v. Nevada.
   Sup. Ct. Nev.

Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9944.
    Allison v. Alameida, Director, California Department of Corrections.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9949.
    Slack v. Jackson, Warden.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9950.
    Sterling v. Texas.
   Ct. App. Tex., 7th Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9955.
    Henderson v. Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9959.
    Henderson v. Briley, Warden.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9962.
    Harris v. West Virginia.
   Cir. Ct. Kanawha County, W. Va. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9964.
    Bridgeforth v. Mullin, Warden.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9979.
    Rector v. Ohio.
   Ct. App. Ohio, Carroll County. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9984.
    Johnson v. Illinois
   App. Ct. Ill., 3d Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9985.
    Johnson v. Lewis, Warden.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9987.
    Beharry v. M. T. A. New York City Transit Authority et al.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9990.
    Williams v. Jamrog, Warden.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9992.
    Anderson v. Demis.
   Cir. Ct. Ingham County, Mich. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9993.
    Eddy v. Schriro, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9994.
    Corradini v. Corradini.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9997.
    Gray v. Edwards et al.
   Ct. App. D. C. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9998.
    Miller v. North Carolina.
   Sup. Ct. N. C. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10003.
    Livingston v. California.
   Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10006.
    McCormick v. Dempster et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10008.
    Smith v. North Carolina.
   Sup. Ct. N. C. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10017.
    Reed v. Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10019.
    Williams v. Lamarque, Warden.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10020.
    Nanthabouthdy v. Humphrey, Warden.
   Super. Ct. Mitchell County, Ga. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10021.
    Taylor v. Georgia.
   Ct. App. Ga. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10023.
    Lavigne v. Varner, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Smithfield, et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10029.
    Barboa, aka Sandoval v. Baird et al.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10032.
    Branch v. Berghuis, Warden.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10040.
    Santiago v. Pennsylvania.
   Super. Ct.. Pa. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10049.
    Wilcher v. Mississippi (two judgments).
   Sup. Ct. Miss. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10065.
    Fitts v. Birkett, Warden.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10093.
    Featherstone v. Columbus City School District Board of Education.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10100.
    Hendley v. Smith, Warden.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10122.
    Hawkins v. Bertrand, Warden.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10140.
    Ihsan v. VISA et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certio-rari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10141.
    Kurti et ux. v. Biedess.
   Ct. App. Ariz. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10155.
    Alford v. Berbary, Superintendent, Collins Correctional Facility.
   App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 4th Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10160.
    Kandekore v. Florida Bar.
   Sup. Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10163.
    McLaughlin-Cox v. Maryland Parole Commission.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10168.
    Phelps et ux. v. Nationwide Insurance Co.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10195.
    Henderson v. Illinois.
   App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10227.
    DuPont v. Maloney, Commissioner, Massachusetts Department of Correction.
   App. Ct. Mass. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10230.
    Wheaton v. Yarborough, Warden.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10253.
    Sumpter v. Georgia Board of Pardons and Parole, Department of Offender Rehabilitation, et al.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied..


text:
    No. 03-10290.
    Scott v. Galaza, Warden.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10309.
    Danes v. Deuth, Superintendent, Correctional Industrial Facility.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10351.
    Jelks v. Small, Warden, et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10352.
    Jameson v. Alameida, Director, California Department of Corrections, et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10390.
    Harrison v. Crosby, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10395.
    Hernandez v. South Carolina et al.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10398.
    Govan v. South Carolina et al.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10496.
    Martin v. Carey, Warden, et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10502.
    Stone v. United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10576.
    Gonzalez v. United States.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10577.
    Fraser v. Zenk, Warden.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10581.
    Tello-Duran v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10586.
    Allen v. United States.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10587.
    Baines, aka Brown v. United States.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10589.
    Landeros-Villa v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10591.
    Jones v. United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10593.
    Berryhill v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10594.
    Baker v. United States.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10595.
    Breland et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10597.
    McGriff v. United States.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10601.
    Miller v. United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10602.
    Lawrence v. United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10603.
    Lopez v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10605.
    Dyson v. United States.
   Ct. App. D. C. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10606.
    Martinez-Andrade v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10609.
    Ajadi v. United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10610.
    Yocum v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10613.
    Garrido-Santana v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10618.
    Evans v. United States.
   Ct. App. D. C. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10619.
    Burton v. United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10629.
    Thomas v. United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10631.
    Alexander v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10636.
    Allen, aka Blake v. United States.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10648.
    Medina-Maella v. United States.
   C. A. 9th

Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10656.
    Moss v. United States.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10657.
    Adegbuji v. Immigration and Naturalization Service.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-10660.
    Medina v. Wisconsin.
   Ct. App. Wis. Certio-rari denied.


text:
    No. 02-1646.
    Higbee Co., dba Dillard Department Stores, Inc. v. Chapman.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Motion of Ohio Coun-

cil of Retail Merchants et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-151.
    Mitchell, Warden v. Davis.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-699.
    Alameida, Director, California Department of Corrections v. Smith.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-959.
    Varco v. Administrative Committee of the Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Associates’ Health and Welfare Plan.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 03-1341.
    Baxter International Inc. et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice O’Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 03-1541.
    Fleming v. United States; and Arnold v. United States.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari before judgment denied.


text:
    No. 03-1570.
    New York v. Mateo.
   Ct. App. N. Y. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-9956.
    Hollis-Arrington v. Cendant Mortgage Corp. et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 03-1028.
    No. 03-1210.
    No. 03-1218.
    No. 03-8007.
    No. 03-8317.
    No. 03-8828.
    No. 03-8839.
    No. 03-9085.
    No. 03-9130.
    No. 03-9173.
    No. 03-9223.
    Middleton, Warden v. McNeil, 541 U. S. 433; Johnson v. Bell, Warden, 541 U. S. 1010; Roane v. National Children’s Center, Inc., et al., 541 U. S. 1030; English v. Bennett, Superintendent, Elmira Correctional Facility, 540 U. S. 1196; Ayer v. New Hampshire, 541 U. S. 942; Hume v. Barton Protective Services, 541 U. S. 992; Barber v. Ohio University et al., 541 U. S. 993; Fields v. United States, 541 U. S. 966; Holiday v. Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, 541 U. S. 1014; Leinenbach, aka Nelson v. United States, 541 U. S. 968; Hurst v. Delaware, 541 U. S. 1033; Barnes v. United States, 541 U. S. 1000; and Williams v. Kemna, Superintendent, Crossroads Correctional Center, 541 U. S. 1052.
    No. 03-9340.
    No. 03-9662.
   Petitions for rehearing denied.


text:
    June 29, 2004
    No. 03A1058 (03-11049).
    Barraza v. Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.
   Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice & alia, and by him referred to the Court, granted pending the disposition of the petition for writ of certiorari. Should the petition for writ of certiorari be denied, this stay shall terminate automatically. In the event the petition for writ of certiorari is granted, the stay shall terminate upon the issuance of the mandate of this Court.


author: Justice Stevens, Justice Scalia,

text:
    June 30, 2004
    No. 03-1413.
    Cox, Georgia Secretary of State v. Larios et al.
   Affirmed on appeal from D. C. N. D. Ga.

Justice Stevens,

with whom Justice Breyer joins, concurring.

Today we affirm the District Court’s judgment that Georgia’s legislative reapportionment plans for the State House of Representatives and Senate violate the one-person, one-vote principle of the Equal Protection Clause. The District Court’s findings disclose two reasons for the unconstitutional population deviations in the state legislative reapportionment plans. The first was “a deliberate and systematic policy of favoring rural and inner-city interests at the expense of suburban areas north, east, and west of Atlanta.” 300 F. Supp. 2d 1320,1327 (ND Ga. 2004). The second was “an intentional effort to allow incumbent Democrats to maintain or increase their delegation, primarily by systematically underpopulating the districts held by incumbent Democrats, by overpopulating those of Republicans, and by deliberately pairing numerous Republican incumbents against one another.” Id., at 1329. The court found that Democratic incumbents “attempted to draw districts that would enhance their own prospects at reelection and further their other political ends (such as building up a support base for a future run for Congress)” and also “targeted particular Republicans to prevent their re-election.” Id., at 1330. As a result,

“[w]hile Democratic incumbents who supported the plans were generally protected, Republican incumbents were regularly pitted against one another in an obviously purposeful attempt to unseat as many of them as possible. In the House Plan, forty-seven incumbents were paired, including thirty-seven Republicans, which was 50% of the Republican caucus, but only nine Democrats, comprising less than 9% of that caucus (as well as one Independent). Because six of the twenty-one districts involved were multi-member districts, the end result was that a maximum of twenty-eight of the paired incumbents could be re-elected, and the remaining nineteen would be unseated. Similarly, the 2002 Senate Plan included six incumbent pairings: four Republican-Republican pairings and two Republican-Democrat pairings. In the 2002 general election, eighteen Republican incumbents in the House and four Republican incumbents in the Senate lost their seats due to the pairings, while only three Democratic incumbents in the House and no Democratic incumbents in the Senate lost seats this way.” Id., at 1329-1330 (citations and footnote omitted).

Although “[t]he numbers largely speak for themselves,” the District Court found that the shapes of many of the newly created districts supplied further evidence that the plans’ drafters “intended] not only to aid Democratic incumbents in getting reelected but also to oust many of their Republican incumbent counterparts.” Id., at 1330. The court noted, for example, that a Republican senator had been “drawn into a district with a Democratic incumbent who ultimately won the 2002 general election, while an open district was drawn within two blocks of her residence,” that two of the most senior Republican senators had been drawn into the same district, and that a Republican House member “who was generally disliked by several of the Democratic incumbent[s] was paired with another representative in an attempt to unseat him.” Ibid. Moreover, many of the districts that paired Republicans were both oddly shaped and overpopulated, “suggesting that the districts were drawn to force Republican incumbents to run against each other and to draw in as many Republican voters as possible in the process.” Ibid.

The drafters’ efforts at selective incumbent protection “led to a significant overall partisan advantage for Democrats in the electoral maps,” with “Republican-leaning districts . . . vastly more overpopulated as a whole than Democratic-leaning districts,” and with many of the large positive population deviations in districts that paired Republican incumbents against each other. Id., at 1331. The District Court found that the population deviations did not result from any attempt to create districts that were compact or contiguous, or to keep counties whole, or to preserve the cores of prior districts. Id., at 1331-1334. Rather, the court concluded, “the population deviations were designed to allow Democrats to maintain or increase their representation in the House and Senate through the under population of districts in Democratic-leaning rural and inner-city areas of the state and through the protection of Democratic incumbents and the impairment of the Republican incumbents’ reelection prospects.” Id., at 1334. The District Court correctly held that the drafters’ desire to give an electoral advantage to certain regions of the State and to certain incumbents (but not incumbents as such) did not justify the conceded deviations from the principle of one person, one vote. See Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U. S. 533, 565-566 (1964) (regionalism is an impermissible basis for population deviations); Gaffney v. Cummings, 412 U. S. 735, 754 (1973) (“[M]ultimember districts may be vulnerable] if racial or political groups have been fenced out of the political process and their voting strength invidiously minimized”). See also Reynolds, 377 U. S., at 579 (explaining that the “overriding objective” of districting “must be substantial equality of population among the various districts” and that deviations from the equal-population principle are permissible only if “incident to the effectuation of a rational state policy”).

In challenging the District Court’s judgment, appellant invites us to weaken the one-person, one-vote standard by creating a safe harbor for population deviations of less than 10 percent, within which districting decisions could be made for any reason whatsoever. The Court properly rejects that invitation. After our recent decision in Vieth v. Jubelirer, 541 U. S. 267 (2004), the equal-population principle remains the only clear limitation on improper districting practices, and we must be careful not to dilute its strength. It bears emphasis, however, that had the Court in Vieth adopted a standard for adjudicating partisan gerrymandering claims, the standard likely would have been satisfied in this case. Appellees alleged that the House and Senate plans were the result of an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander. The District Court rejected that claim because it considered itself bound by the plurality opinion in Davis v. Bandemer, 478 U. S. 109 (1986), and appellees could not show that they had been “ ‘essentially shut out of the political process.’ ” App. to Juris. Statement 86a (quoting Bandemer, 478 U. S., at 139). Appellees do not challenge that ruling, and it is not before us. But the District Court’s detailed factual findings regarding appellees’ equal protection claim confirm that an impermissible partisan gerrymander is visible to the judicial eye and subject to judicially manageable standards. Indeed, the District Court’s findings make clear that appellees could satisfy either the standard endorsed by the Court in its racial gerrymandering cases or that advocated in Justice Powell’s dissent in Bandemer, 478 U. S., at 173-185.

Drawing district lines that have no neutral justification in order to place two incumbents of the opposite party in the same district is probative of the same impermissible intent as the “uncouth twenty-eight-sided figure” that defined the boundary of Tuskegee, Alabama, in Gomillion v. Lightfoot, 364 U. S. 339, 340 (1960), or the “dragon descending on Philadelphia from the west” that defined Pennsylvania’s District 6 in Vieth, 541 U. S., at 340 (Stevens, J., dissenting) (internal quotation marks omitted). The record in this case, like the allegations in Gomillion and in Vieth, reinforce my conclusion that “the unavailability of judicially manageable standards” cannot justify a refusal “to condemn even the most blatant violations of a state legislature’s fundamental duty to govern impartially.” Vieth, 541 U. S., at 341. I remain convinced that in time the present “failure of judicial will,” ibid., will be replaced by stern condemnation of partisan gerrymandering that does not even pretend to be justified by neutral principles.

Justice Scalia,

dissenting.

When reviewing States’ redistrieting of their own legislative boundaries, we have been appropriately deferential. See Mahan v. Howell, 410 U. S. 315, 327 (1973). A seriés of our cases established the principle that “minor deviations” among districts — deviations of less than 10% — are “‘insufficient to make out a prima facie case of invidious discrimination under the Fourteenth Amendment so as.to require justification by the State.’” Brown v. Thomson, 462 U. S. 835, 842 (1983) (quoting Gaffney v. Cummings, 412 U. S. 735, 745 (1973)); see also Voinovich v. Quilter, 507 U. S. 146, 160-162 (1993). This case presents a question that Brown, Gaffney, and Voinovich did not squarely confront— whether a districting plan that satisfies this 10% criterion may nevertheless be invalidated on the basis of circumstantial evidence of partisan political motivation.

The state officials who drafted Georgia’s redistrieting plan believed the answer to that question was “no,” reading our cases to establish a 10% “safe harbor” with which they meticulously complied. The court below disagreed. No party here contends that, beyond grand generalities in cases such as Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U. S. 533, 577 (1964), this Court has addressed the question. The opinion below is consistent with others to have addressed the issue; there is no obvious conflict among the lower courts. This is not a petition for certiorari, however, but an appeal, and we should not summarily affirm unless it is clear that the disposition of this case is correct.

In my view, that is not clear. A substantial case can be made that Georgia’s redistrieting plan did comply with the Constitution. Appellees do not contend that the population deviations — all less than 5% from the mean — were based on race or some other suspect classification. They claim only impermissible political bias — that state legislators tried to improve the electoral chances of Democrats over Republicans by underpopulating inner-city and rural districts and by selectively protecting incumbents, while ignoring “traditional” redistricting criteria. The District Court agreed. See App. to Juris. Statement 8a-25a.

The problem with this analysis is that it assumes “politics as usual” is not itself a “traditional” redistricting criterion. In the recent decision in Vieth v. Jubelirer, 541 U. S. 267 (2004), all but one of the Justices agreed that it is a traditional criterion, and a constitutional one, so long as it does not go too far. See id., at 285-286 (plurality opinion); id., at 307 (Kennedy, J., concurring in judgment); id., at 344 (Souter, J., dissenting); id., at 355 (Breyer, J., dissenting). It is not obvious to me that a legislature goes too far when it stays within the 10% disparity in population our cases allow. To say that it does is to invite allegations of political motivation whenever there is population disparity, and thus to destroy the 10% safe harbor our cases provide. Ferreting out political motives in minute population deviations seems to me more likely to encourage politically motivated litigation than to vindicate political rights.

I would set the case for argument.

      A tally of the votes in the State Senate elections shows that, although Republicans won a majority of votes statewide (991,108 Republican votes to 814,641 Democrat votes), Democrats won a majority of the State Senate seats (30 to 26). See 2002 Georgia Election Results, www.sos.state.ga.us/ elections/election_results/2002_1105/senate.htm (as visited June 23, 2004, and available in Clerk of Court’s case file). Thus, it appears that appellees also could state a partisan gerrymandering claim under Justice Breyer’s indicia of unjustified entrenchment. See Vieth v. Jubelirer, 541 U. S. 267, 366 (2004) (dissenting opinion) (“[a] the boundary-drawing criteria depart radically from previous or traditional criteria; [b] the departure cannot be justified or explained other than by reference to an effort to obtain partisan political advantage; and [c] a majority party [i. e., party receiving majority of total votes in relevant election] has once failed to obtain a majority of the relevant seats in election using the challenged map”).


text:
    No. 03-590.
    Wisconsin v. Knapp.
   Sup. Ct. Wis. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of United States v. Patane, ante, p. 630.


text:
    No. 03-1245.
    Bush, President of the United States, et al. v. Gherebi.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Rumsfeld v. Padilla, ante, p. 426.


text:
    No. 04A5.
    Harris v. Johnson, Executive Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, et al.
   Application to stay or vacate Fifth Circuit order, reinstate District Court order, or for a temporary restraining order, presented to Justice Scalia, and by him referred to the Court, denied.


text:
    No. 02-1433 (03A1056).
    Harris v. Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, 540 U. S. 1218.
   Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Scalia, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis granted. Motion for leave to file petition for rehearing denied.


text:
    No. 03-11092 (03A1065).
    In re Harris.
   Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Scalia, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.

Justice Breyer would grant the application for stay of execution.


text:
    No. 02-1865.
    3M Co., fka Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. LePage’s Inc. et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 02-7385.
    Faulkingham v. United States.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 03-1381.
    Chavez v. Martinez.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certio-rari denied.


text:
    No. 03-11042 (03A1057).
    Lenz v. True, Warden.
   Sup. Ct. Va. Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to The Chief Justice, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 04-5010 (04A1).
    Harris v. Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Scalia, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Certiorari denied.


text:
    July 1, 2004
    No. 04-5049 (04A9).
    In re Hicks.
   Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Kennedy, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.


text:
    No. 04-5040 (04A8).
    Hicks v. Schofield, Warden.
   Sup. Ct. Ga. Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Kennedy, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Certiorari denied.


text:
    July 7, 2004
    No. 04A14 (03-10472).
    Kunkle v. Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Scalia, and by him referred to the Court, granted pending the disposition of the petition for writ of certiorari. Should the petition for writ of certio-rari be denied, this stay shall terminate automatically. In the event the petition for writ of certiorari is granted, the stay shall terminate upon the sending down of the judgment of this Court.


text:
    July 19, 2004
    No. 04A59.
    Crawford v. Schofield, Warden.
   Sup. Ct. Ga. Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Kennedy, and by him referred to the Court, denied.

Justice Stevens, Justice Souter, Justice Ginsburg, and Justice Breyer would grant the application for stay of execution. Justice O’Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.


text:
    No. 04-5222 (04A46).
    Crawford v. Schofield, Warden.
   Sup. Ct. Ga. Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Kennedy, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Certiorari denied.

Justice Stevens, Justice Souter, and Justice Ginsburg would grant the application for stay of execution.


text:
    No. 04-5222 (04A58).
    Crawford v. Schofield, Warden, supra this page.
   Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Kennedy, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Petition for rehearing denied.

Justice Stevens, Justice Souter, and Justice Ginsburg would grant the application for stay of execution. Justice O’Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this application and this petition.


text:
    July 21, 2004
    No. 04-104.
    United States v. Booker.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Respondent is directed to file responses to petition for writ of certio-rari and to motion to expedite consideration on or before 3 p.m., Wednesday, July 28, 2004.


text:
    No. 04-105.
    United States v. Fanfan.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Respondent is directed to file responses to petition for writ of certio-rari before judgment and to motion to expedite consideration on or before 3 p.m., Wednesday, July 28, 2004.


text:
    No. 04-5251 (04A54).
    Bailey v. True, Warden.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to The Chief Justice, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Certiorari denied.

Justice Stevens and Justice Ginsburg would grant the application for stay of execution.


text:
    August 2, 2004
    No. 03A965.
    Kroncke v. Hood et al.
   Application for certificate of appealability, addressed to Justice Stevens and referred to the Court, denied.


text:
    No. 03A990.
    Stern v. United States.
   Application for bail, addressed to Justice Scalia and referred to the Court, denied.


text:
    No. D-2373.
    In re Disbarment of Walk.
   Disbarment

entered. [For earlier order herein, see 541 U. S. 933.]


text:
    No. D-2374.
    In re Disbarment of Ayeni.
   Disbarment entered. [For earlier order herein, see 541 U. S. 933.]


text:
    No. D-2375.
    In re Disbarment of Gates.
   Disbarment entered. [For earlier order herein, see 541 U. S. 985.]


text:
    No. D-2376.
    In re Disbarment of Gomez.
   Disbarment entered. [For earlier order herein, see 541 U. S. 985.]


text:
    No. D-2377.
    In re Discipline of Vinyard.
   It is ordered that Michael C. Vinyard, of Ottumwa, Iowa, be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.


text:
    No. 04-104.
    No. 04-105.
    United States v. Booker. and United States v. Fanfan.
   C. A. 7th Cir.;

C. A. 1st Cir. Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to file a reply brief in excess of the page limits granted. Certiorari in No. 04-104 granted. Certiorari before judgment in No. 04-105 granted. Cases consolidated, and a total of two hours allotted for oral argument. Brief of petitioner is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Wednesday, September 1, 2004. Briefs of respondents are to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, September 21, 2004. A reply brief, if any, is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Monday, September 27, 2004. Oral argument set for Monday, October 4, 2004.


text:
    No. 03-1008.
    No. 03-1229.
    No. 03-1251.
    No. 03-1318.
    No. 03-1373.
    No. 03-9052.
    No. 03-9064.
    No. 03-9161.
    No. 03-9220.
    No. 03-9246.
    No. 03-9314.
    Pastene v. Pikkert, 541 U. S. 987; DeMoss v. Texas, 541 U. S. 1030; Walker v. QuadGraphics, Inc., 541 U. S. 1041; Whitehorn v. Federal Communications Commission, 541 U. S. 1031; St. Hilaire v. St. Hilaire, 541 U. S. 1044; Bohm v. Burt, Warden, 541 U. S. 1013; Haley v. United States, 541 U. S. 966; In re Bell, 541 U. S. 1029; Parnell v. Crosby, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, 541 U. S. 1033; Ruggiere v. Ruggiere, 541 U. S. 1045; Robinson v. Conway, Superintendent, Attica Correctional Facility, 541 U. S. 1016; Restucci v. Spencer, Superintendent, Massachusetts Correctional Institution at Norfolk, 541 U. S. 1047; Butler v. Cloud et al., 541 U. S. 1047; Sturgis v. Lavan, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Dallas, 541 U. S. 1048; Gregory v. Spannagel et ux., 541 U. S. 1048; Debejare v. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security, 541 U. S. 1048; Bryant v. Fletcher, Warden, 541 U. S. 1049; Pope v. Marshall, 541 U. S. 1065; Wimbush v. Gaddis et al., 541 U. S. 1065; Ligón v. Boswell, 541 U. S. 1017; O’Neal v. National Plastics Corp., 541 U. S. 1050; Russell v. Garrard et al., 541 U. S. 1066; Mitchell v. Tennessee et al., 541 U. S. 1066; Aranda v. United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, 541 U. S. 1017; In re Setts, 541 U. S. 986; Colon v. Connolly et al., 541 U. S. 1034; Adams v. Negron et al., 541 U. S. 1035; Latson v. Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, 541 U. S. 1076; Perry v. Lockheed Missiles & Space Co., Inc., et al., 541 U. S. 1076; Chaudry v. Whispering Ridge Homeowners Assn., 541 U. S. 1067; Davila v. Armstrong et al., 541 U. S. 1051; Moppins v. Carey, Warden, 541 U. S. 1087; Cason v. Maryland Division of Correction et al., 541 U. S. 1067; Dulisse v. Central Penn Property Service, Inc., 541 U. S. 1088; Nowik v. North Dakota, 541 U. S. 1077; Bryant-Bey v. Georgia, 541 U. S. 1089; Fagan v. United States, 541 U. S. 1053; Webber v. United States, 541 U. S. 1054; Glover v. United States, 541 U. S. 1054; Lawrence v. DeRosa, Warden, 541 U. S. 1055; Gordon et al. v. Alabama et al., ante, p. 908; Moore v. Schuetzle, Warden, 541 U. S. 1079; Taylor v. United States, 541 U. S. 1069; Morris v. United States, 541 U. S. 1069; Vega-Colon et al. v. United States, 541 U. S. 1074; Austin v. Gillis, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Coal Township, et al., ante, p. 909; In re Ellis, 541 U. S. 1040; Gibson et al. v. United States, 541 U. S. 1081; In re Hess, 541 U. S. 1071; Arnett v. United States, 541 U. S. 1091; Madrigal-Ferreira v. United States, 541 U. S. 1091; In re West, 541 U. S. 1071; Graham v. Adams et al., 541 U. S. 1092; and Green v. United States, 541 U. S. 1092.

      No. 03-9322.
    No. 03-9331.
    No. 03-9360.
    No. 03-9370.
    No. 03-9385.
    No. 03-9428.
    No. 03-9435.
    No. 03-9442.
    No. 03-9444.
    No. 03-9459.
    No. 03-9489.
    No. 03-9501.
    No. 03-9528.
    No. 03-9535.
    No. 03-9536.
    No. 03-9544.
    No. 03-9578.
    No. 03-9594.
    No. 03-9606.
    No. 03-9608.
    No. 03-9635.
    No. 03-9647.
    No. 03-9657.
    No. 03-9695.
    No. 03-9710.
    No. 03-9729.
    No. 03-9748.
    No. 03-9772.
    No. 03-9812.

      No. 03-9848.
    No. 03-9899.
    No. 03-9910.
    No. 03-9912.
    No. 03-9935.
    No. 03-9963.
    No. 03-9977.
    No. 03-10071.
    No. 03-10118.
    No. 03-10137.
    No. 03-10143.
    No. 03-10153.
    No. 03-10188.
    No. 03-10206.
   Petitions for rehearing denied.


text:
    No. 02-1259.
    No. 03-9260.
    No. 03-9886.
    No. 03-9971.
    Stevens v. Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department, 538 U. S. 979; Dye v. Ozmint, Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections, et al., 541 U. S. 1016; Bear Child v. United States, 541 U. S. 1056; and Patterson v. United States, 541 U. S. 1079.
   Motions for leave to file petitions for rehearing denied.


text:
    No. 03-9656.
    No. 03-9858.
    Dulisse v. Homeside Lending, Inc., 541 U. S. 1096; and Dixon v. EquiCredit Corp. et al., 541 U. S. 1083.
   Petitions for rehearing denied.

Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.


text:
    August 5, 2004
    No. 04-5646 (04A130).
    Hubbard v. Campbell, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Kennedy, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Certiorari denied.

Justice Stevens, Justice Souter, Justice Ginsburg, and Justice Breyer would grant the application for stay of execution.


text:
    August 11, 2004
    No. 04A87.
    Johnson, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, et al. v. Reid.
   Application to vacate the stay of

execution of sentence of death entered by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit on December 17, 2003, presented to The Chief Justice, and by him referred to the Court, granted.

Justice Stevens, Justice Souter, Justice Ginsburg, and Justice Breyer would deny the application to vacate the stay of execution.


text:
    August 12, 2004
    No. 04-5707 (04A114).
    Dennis, By and Through Butko, as Next Friend v. Budge, Warden, et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice O’Connor, and by her referred to the Court, denied. Certiorari denied.


text:
    August 19, 2004
    No. 03-1538.
    Mamandur et ux. v. Power et al.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari dismissed under this Court’s Rule 46.


text:
    No. 03-1694.
    New York Life Insurance Co. v. Bess.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari dismissed under this Court’s Rule 46.


text:
    August 23, 2004
    No. 03-1598.
    Rector and Visitors of George Mason University v. Shepard et al.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari dismissed under this Court’s Rule 46.1.


text:
    No. 04-92.
    Nebraska et al. v. Central Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Commission.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Cer-tiorari dismissed under this Court’s Rule 46.1.


text:
    No. 03-357.
    No. 03-984.
    No. 03-1357.
    No. 03-1385.
    No. 03-1387.
    No. 03-1447.
    No. 03-1469.
    No. 03-1473.
    No. 03-5554.
    No. 03-9072.
    No. 03-9273.
    No. 03-9613.
    No. 03-9707.
    No. 03-9771.
    No. 03-9815.
    No. 03-9889.
    No. 03-10006.
    No. 03-10007.
    No. 03-10014.
    Adams, Warden, et al. v. Brambles, Balser et ux. v. Department of Justice, Office of the United States Trustee, 541 U. S. 1041; Bush v. City of Zeeland, Michigan, et al., 541 U. S. 1072; Holguin v. Flood Control District of Greenlee County, Arizona, et al., 541 U. S. 1086; Philson, aka Allah v. Sherrer, Administrator, Northern State Prison, et al., 541 U. S. 1086; Roe v. Aware Woman Center for Choice, Inc., et al., Jonas v. South Carolina Discount Auto Center, Persik v. Manpower Inc., 541 U. S. 1086; Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada, Humboldt County, et al., Adams v. United States, Sansing v. Arizona, Alexander v. Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, 541 U. S. 1077; Ibanez v. Verizon Virginia Inc., 541 U. S. 1077; Lollar v. Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Austin v. United States District Court for the District of Nevada, 541 U. S. 1078; Mitchell v. Department of Commerce, 541 U. S. 1079; McCormick v. Dempster et al., In re McCormick, Everett v. Pennsylvania et al., Wilcher v. Mississippi (two judgments), Daniels v. United States, 541 U. S. 1081; Attia v. Social Security Administration et al., Blunt v. Highland Park City School District, 541 U. S. 1093; Sanders v. United States, Wright v. United States, and In re Sambrano Villarreal,
   ante, p. 933; ante, p. 920; ante, p. 938; ante, p. 177; ante, p. 921; ante, p. 939; ante, p. 907; ante, p. 941; ante, p. 935; ante, p. 909; ante, p. 942; ante, p. 910; ante, p. 911; ante, p. 913; ante, p. 935. Petitions for rehearing denied.

No. 03-10049.

No. 03-10061.

No. 03-10167.

No. 03-10237.

No. 03-10252.

No. 03-10291.

No. 03-10730.


text:
    No. 02-1624.
    Elk Grove Unified School District et al. v. Newdow et al.
   ante, p. 1. Petition for rehearing denied.

Justice Scalia took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 02-1632.
    Blakely v. Washington,
   ante, p. 296. Motion of respondent to expedite consideration of petition for rehearing denied. Petition for rehearing denied.