text:
    No. 74-1092.
    Brown v. Virginia.
   Sup. Ct. Va. Certiorari denied.


source: Caselaw Access Project

license: Public Domain

text:
    No. 74-1016.
    Kahn v. Dynamics Corporation of America.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1010.
    Slatton v. Martin K. Eby Construction Co., Inc., dba Eby & Associates of Arkansas.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1079.
    Maritime Overseas Corp. et al. v. Linabary.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1087.
    Ross v. Arkansas.
   Sup. Ct. Ark. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1099.
    Village of Camillus et al. v. Diamond, Commissioner of Environmental Conservation.
   App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 4th Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1122.
    No. 74-1123.
    Board of Education of Jefferson County, Kentucky, et al. v. Newburg Area Council, Inc., et al.; and Board of Education of Louisville, Kentucky, et al. v. Haycraft et al.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1136.
    Derby v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.
   Sup. Ct. Conn. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-5825.
    No. 74-5957.
    Hollins v. United States; and Harris v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-5841.
    Webb v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-5876.
    Brown v. United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-5878.
    Lewis v. Henderson, Warden.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-5896.
    Brown v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-5900.
    Greene v. Florida.
   Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 4th Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-5935.
    Henry v. United States.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-5939.
    Miller v. United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-5949.
    Dixon v. United States Board of Parole et al.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-5950.
    Talk v. United States.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-5960.
    No. 74-6021.
    Needham v. United States; and Jenkins v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-5982.
    Watson v. United States.
   C. A. 3rd Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6006.
    Roberts v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6007.
    Mike v. Levi, Attorney General.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6038.
    Shepherd v. Shepherd.
   Sup. Ct. Ga. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6088.
    Matthews v. United States.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6109.
    Bragg v. Mid-America Federal Savings & Loan Assn, et al.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6112.
    Norton v. Vincent, Correctional Superintendent.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6114.
    Moss v. Wolff, Warden.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6115.
    Kuhl v. United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6116.
    Gundlach v. Nebraska.
   Sup. Ct. Neb. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6119.
    Horton v. Magistrate of the Court et al.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6120.
    Weiner v. Pennsylvania.
   Sup. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6124.
    Wood v. Oklahoma et al.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6135.
    Drayton v. Wainwright, Corrections Director.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6138.
    Rutherford v. Cupp, Penitentiary Superintendent.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6145.
    Taylor v. California.
   Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


author: Mr. Justice Brennan,

text:
    No. 73-982.
    Adult Book Store et al. v. Sensenbrenner, Mayor of Columbus.
   Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Brennan,

with whom Mr. Justice Stewart and Mr. Justice Marshall join,

dissenting.

Petitioners were enjoined from selling or distributing 127 publications determined to be obscene under the Ohio obscenity statute, Ohio Rev. Code Ann. §§ 2905.34-2905.35 (Supp. 1972). The Court of Appeals of Franklin County affirmed, and the Supreme Court of Ohio dismissed the appeal. We granted the petition for certiorari and remanded the case for further consideration in light of Miller v. California, 413 U. S. 15 (1973). 413 U. S. 911 (1973). On remand, the Supreme Court of Ohio affirmed the judgment of the Court of Appeals. 35 Ohio St. 2d 220, 301 N. E. 2d 695.

For the reasons stated in my dissent from the remand of this case, and because the present judgment was rendered after Miller, I would grant the petition and reverse the judgment.


author: Mr. Justice White,

text:
    No. 74-783.
    DeMarrias v. Poitra.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Motion of Standing Rock Sioux Tribe for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice White,

dissenting.

Petitioner and respondent are both enrolled Indians residing on the Standing Rock Sioux Indian Reservation, a reservation which straddles the border of North Dakota and South Dakota. Petitioner is resident in the portion of the reservation in South Dakota, and respondent lives within that portion in North Dakota. This litigation arose from an automobile accident occurring on the reservation in North Dakota. Respondent’s son was injured by a car driven by petitioner and died as a result. Respondent brought this wrongful death action based upon North Dakota law in the Federal District Court, invoking its jurisdiction under 28 U. S. C. § 1332 (a). When petitioner failed to respond, the North Dakota Unsatisfied Judgment Fund appeared and moved to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.

The District Court, basing its decision upon Erie R. Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U. S. 64 (1938), concluded that it did not have jurisdiction over respondent’s suit. The Standing Rock Sioux Tribe had not consented to the jurisdiction of the North Dakota state courts, as required for the exercise of state-court jurisdiction in civil suits between Indians under 25 U. S. C. § 1322 (a), and the state courts would not have jurisdiction over respondent’s suit although based upon North Dakota substantive law. See Gourneau v. Smith, 207 N. W. 2d 256 (ND 1973). Viewing itself as another state court in diversity cases, the District Court concluded that it, too, could not entertain the suit. 369 F. Supp. 257 (ND 1973).

The Court of Appeals reversed. 502 F. 2d 23 (CA8 1974). It concluded that there was no state policy involved in the absence of state-court jurisdiction over this type of litigation. The lack of jurisdiction arose from the federal requirement of consent by the Indians to such jurisdiction and the failure of the tribe here to consent. The federal “consent” statute, 25 U. S. C. § 1322 (a), was not intended to deprive Indians of state-created substantive rights, but rather had as its purpose an effort to prevent the States from interfering with Indian affairs. See 502 F. 2d, at 29.

The court below acknowledged that the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit had in two decisions held that a district court could not exercise diversity jurisdiction in situations in which the state courts would not exercise subject-matter jurisdiction. See Hot Oil Service, Inc. v. Hall, 366 F. 2d 295 (1966); Littell v. Nakai, 344 F. 2d 486 (1965), cert. denied, 382 U. S. 986 (1966). It distinguished those decisions on the ground that each involved an effort to avoid interference, under the principle of Williams v. Lee, 358 U. S. 217 (1959), with tribal self-government. In this case, in contrast, the suit involved a dispute between two Indian litigants, and there were no “interfering outsiders ... trying to foist jurisdiction on the Indians.” 502 F. 2d, at 29.

The court below, however, misconstrued the role of the discussion of Williams v. Lee, supra, in the Ninth Circuit decisions. When those' cases were decided, the question of whether the subject matter of the litigation was essential to tribal self-government was the key to whether state courts could exercise jurisdiction. See 358 U. S., at 223. Since its enactment in 1968, however, the “consent” statute, 25 U. S. C. §§ 1322 (a) and 1326, provides an explicit procedure through which civil jurisdiction over Indians can be obtained by state courts. See McClanahan v. Arizona State Tax Comm’n, 411 U. S. 164, 177-178 (1973); Kennedy v. District Court of Montana, 400 U. S. 423 (1971). It is conceded here that the subject matter of this suit, whether or not essential to tribal self-government, cannot be the basis for state-court jurisdiction. Therefore, the significant aspect of the Ninth Circuit decisions is their reliance upon Woods v. Interstate Realty Co., 337 U. S. 535 (1949). Extending that reliance to this case would result in a conclusion that the federal courts did not have jurisdiction.

The decisions of the Courts of Appeals for the Eighth and Ninth Circuits are, therefore, squarely in conflict, and resolution of the conflict will require an appraisal of the roles of the Erie R. Co. v. Tompkins line of cases and of the federal legislation governing jurisdiction by-state courts over Indians in this factual situation.

I would grant certiorari.


text:
    No. 74-1037.
    Alligator Co., Inc. v. La Chemise Lacoste et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice White,

with whom Mr. Justice Black-mun and Mr. Justice Powell join,

dissenting.

Respondent La Chemise Lacoste (LCL) initiated this trademark litigation by filing a complaint seeking declaratory and injunctive relief in the Delaware state courts. Petitioner removed it to the District Court under 28 U. S. C. § 1441 (a). The District Court denied respondent’s motion for a remand under 28 U. S. C. § 1447(c). See 313 F. Supp. 915 (Del. 1970). The District Court also denied respondent’s motion for a certificate allowing an interlocutory appeal of the removal question under 28 U. S. C. § 1292 (b). When the trial court denied its motion for a preliminary injunction, respondent appealed but did not raise the removal issue; and in affirming the denial of the preliminary injunction, the Court of Appeals did not discuss the question. 487 F. 2d 312 (CA3 1973)..

The District Court then conducted a six-day trial on the merits and concluded that petitioner was entitled to injunctive relief. 374 F. Supp. 52 (1974). Respondent then appealed from the final judgment. This time it also raised the removal question. The Court of Appeals ruled that this appeal represented the first opportunity that LCL had to have the District Court’s decision denying remand reviewed. There thus had been no waiver of the removal question, and this Court’s decision in Grubbs v. General Electric Credit Corp., 405 U. S. 699 (1972), had no application. The Court of Appeals then reversed the District Court on the removal question and ordered a remand to the state court. 506 F. 2d 339 (1974).

In holding that the refusal to remand a removal case could not be raised on an appeal from a denial of a preliminary injunction, the decision of the Court of Appeals departs from its prior holding in Mayflower Industries v. Thor Corp., 184 F. 2d 537, 538 (1950), cert. denied, 341 U. S. 903 (1951), and conflicts with the decisions of other Courts of Appeals in Beech-Nut, Inc. v. Warner-Lambert Co., 480 F. 2d 801 (CA2 1973), and Kysor Industrial Corp. v. Pet, Inc., 459 F. 2d 1010, 1011 (CA6), cert. denied, 409 U. S. 980 (1972). Furthermore, it would appear that jurisdictional questions should be reviewed at the first available opportunity, and I perceive no good reason for not permitting the removal issue to be raised in connection with an appeal from the denial of a preliminary injunction. Had that course been followed here, six days of trial and a decision on the merits would not have been wasted. Also, if it were to be held that the appeal on the injunction issue is a suitable occasion for considering the remand question, then Grubbs, supra, should be extended so as to require that the question be raised on such an appeal. Otherwise, wasteful litigation is invited, and the losing party-on the merits is given another bite at the apple.

I would grant certiorari in this case to resolve the conflict among the Circuits.

       The authorities relied upon by the Court of Appeals—Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. Stude, 346 U. S. 574, 578 (1954); Wilkins v. American Export-Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc., 401 F. 2d 151 (CA2 (1968); C. Wright, Law of Federal Courts §41, p. 147 (2d ed. 1970) — support the principle that the denial of a motion for remand alone is not a basis for appeal, but they do not support the lower court’s decision that the removal question cannot be raised upon appeal from the denial of an interlocutory injunction. Petitioner’s position on that issue is supported by Deckert v. Independence Shares Corp., 311 U. S. 282, 287 (1940), which held that the District Court’s denial of motions to dismiss could be reviewed by the Court of Appeals upon an appeal from the granting of an interlocutory injunction.


text:
    No. 74-1061.
    Anderson, Warden, et al. v. Radcliff et al.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Motion of respondents for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 73-1148.
    DeCoteau, Natural Mother and Next Friend of Feather et al. v. District County Court for the Tenth Judicial District,
   420 U. S. 425;


text:
    No. 73-1500.
    Erickson, Warden v. United States ex rel. Feather et al.,
   420 U. S. 425; and


text:
    No. 74-5776.
    Fahrig et al. v. Cotterman et al.,
   420 U. S. 915. Petitions for rehearing denied.


text:
    No. 74-875.
    Burton et al. v. Waller, Governor of Mississippi, et al.,
   420 U. S. 964. Motion of Members of the Board of Trustees of the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Petition for rehearing denied. Mr. Justice Brennan and Mr. Justice Marshall dissent from the denial of this petition.


text:
    April 28, 1975

    No. 74-238.
    National Liberty Life Insurance Co. v. Wisconsin.

       Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of cases in which orders hereinafter reported were announced on this date, with the exception of No. 74-903, Dyke v. Georgia, infra, p. 952.

   Appeal from Sup. Ct. Wis. This appeal having been made expressly contingent upon a grant of certiorari in No. 74 — 193, Wisconsin v. National Liberty Life Insurance Co., and the petition for writ of certiorari in No. 74r-193 having been denied today, infra, p. 947, the appeal is dismissed.


text:
    No. 74-1001.
    National Broadcasting Co., Inc., et al. v. United States.
   Appeal from D. C. C. D. Cal. dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Mr. Justice Rehnquist dissents.


text:
    No. 74-793.
    Marks et al. v. Leis, Prosecutor of Hamilton County, et al.
   Appeal from D. C. S. D. Ohio. Judgment vacated and cause remanded for further consideration in light of Sosna v. Iowa, 419 U. S. 393 (1975), and Huffman v. Pursue, Ltd., 420 U. S. 592 (1975).

Mr. Justice Brennan,

with whom Mr. Justice Marshall joins,

dissenting.

Nuisance proceedings were begun against appellants in Ohio courts on the theory that the some of the books sold in a bookstore on premises owned by one appellant and leased by the others were obscene, and that the bookstore was therefore a nuisance. The Ohio statutory scheme underlying these nuisance proceedings is outlined in Huffman v. Pursue, Ltd., 420 U. S. 592 (1975).

Appellants filed suit in Federal District Court while the state proceedings were pending seeking injunctions against the state proceedings. The parties agreed not to go forward with the state-court proceedings until the Federal District Court litigation was completed. The federal court refused to enjoin the state proceedings, be- ' cause it believed that Ohio could treat as a nuisance and close for a year a bookstore which sold some obscene materials, without running afoul of the constitutional proscriptions against prior restraint of materials protected by the First Amendment.

A similar issue was presented on the merits in Huffman, supra. However, the Court refused to pass on the merits, because it believed that the federal court was barred from intervening in the state proceedings. The Court now remands this case for further consideration in light of Huffman, supra, and Sosna v. Iowa, 419 U. S. 393 (1975). But I think it clear that even if Huffman was correctly decided, see 420 U. S., at 613 (Brennan, J., dissenting), it does not govern this case. Here, the prosecuting authorities expressly agreed to submit to federal-court jurisdiction, and they do not in this Court argue that the District Court could not have enjoined the state proceedings even if it believed them unconstitutional. Thus, any reliance on the principles of Younger v. Harris, 401 U. S. 37 (1971), has been waived. See Sosna v. Iowa, supra, at 396 n. 3.

I need not reach the question of whether the Ohio scheme constitutes an impermissible prior restraint upon books never judicially determined to be obscene, because I believe that suppression even of specific books adjudicated obscene in nuisance proceedings is unconstitutional.

Ohio defines obscenity as follows:

“(A) Any material or performance is ‘obscene’ if, when considered as a whole and judged with reference to ordinary adults, any of the following apply:
“(1) Its dominant appeal is to prurient interest;
“(2) Its dominant tendency is to arouse lust by displaying or depicting nudity, sexual excitement, or sexual conduct in a way which tends to represent human beings as mere objects of sexual appetite;
“(3) Its dominant tendency is to arouse lust by displaying or depicting bestiality or extreme or bizarre violence, cruelty, or brutality;
“(4) It contains a series of displays or descriptions of nudity, sexual excitement, sexual conduct, bestiality, extreme or bizarre violence, cruelty, or brutality, or human bodily functions of elimination, the cumulative effect of which is a dominant tendency to appeal to prurient interest, when the appeal to such interest is primarily for its own sake or for commercial exploitation, rather than for a genuine scientific, educational, sociological, moral, or artistic purpose.” Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 2905.34 (Supp. 1972), now Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 2907.01 (1975).

It is my view that “at least in the absence of distribution to juveniles or obtrusive exposure to unconsenting adults, the First and Fourteenth Amendments prohibit the State and Federal Governments from attempting wholly to suppress sexually oriented materials on the basis of their allegedly ‘obscene’ contents.” Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49, 113 (1973) (Brennan, J., dissenting). It is clear that, when tested by that constitutional standard, § 2905.34, is unconstitutionally over-broad and therefore facially invalid. For the reasons stated in my dissent in Miller v. California, 413 U. S. 15, 47 (1973), suppression of any materials whatever on the basis of the definition of obscenity in § 2905.34 is, in my view, impermissible. Because the judgment of the District Court was rendered after Miller, I would reverse.


text:
    No. 74-1242.
    Custom Recording Co., Inc. v. Blanton, Governor of Tennessee, et al.
   Appeal from D. C. M. D. Tenn. Judgment vacated and case remanded so that a fresh order may be entered from which a timely appeal may be taken to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. MTM, Inc. v. Baxley, 420 U. S. 799 (1975).


text:
    No. 73-1827.
    United States et al. v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of United States v. Bisceglia, 420 U. S. 141 (1975). Mr. Justice Stewart and Mr. Justice Blackmun would deny the petition. Mr. Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

       See also note, supra, p. 940.


text:
    No. 73-1884.
    Jones v. Kentucky.
   Ct. App. Ky. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Drope v. Missouri, 420 U. S. 162 (1975).


text:
    No. 74-36.
    United States v. Lewis.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and certiorari granted. Judgment vacated and case remanded for further consideration in light of Serfass v. United States, 420 U. S. 377 (1975).


text:
    No. 74-5246.
    Ives v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and certiorari granted. Judgment vacated and case remanded for further consideration in light of Drope v. Missouri, 420 U. S. 162 (1975).


text:
    No.---.
    Oppenheimer v. Los Angeles County Flood Control District et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Motion to dispense with printing petition' for writ of certiorari denied. Snider v. All State Administrators, Inc., 414 U. S. 685 (1974).


text:
    No. A-816.
    Grant et ux. v. First Western Bank, aka Lloyds Bank, et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Application for stay of order of the United States District Court for the Central District of California, entered on March 3, 1975, denied.


text:
    No. A-853 (74-1302).
    Dunlop, Secretary of Labor, et al. v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co. et al.
   Application for stay of order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky, entered on November 20, 1974, presented to Mr. Justice Stewart, and by him referred to the Court, granted pending final

disposition of appeal by this Court.


text:
    No. 74-754.
    United States v. Mandujano.
   C. A. 5th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 420 U. S. 989.] Motion for appointment of counsel granted. It is ordered that Michael Allen Peters, Esquire, of Houston, Tex., be, and he is hereby, appointed to serve as counsel for respondent in this case.


text:
    No. A-863.
    No. A-864.
    No. A-875.
    Exxon Corp. et al. v. Environmental Protection Agency; Texas Chemical Council v. Environmental Protection Agency; and Harris County et al. v. Environmental Protection Agency.
   Applications for stay of mandate of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, presented to Mr. Justice Rehnquist, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Mr. Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.

       See also note, supra, p. 940.


text:
    No. 73-1869.
    Beer et al. v. United States et al.
   Appeal from D. C. D. C. [Probable jurisdiction noted, 419 U. S. 822.] Case restored to calendar for reargument.


text:
    No. 74-742.
    Foremost-McKesson, Inc. v. Provident Securities Co.
   C. A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 420 U. S. 923.] Motion of Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co. for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted.


text:
    No. 74-1047.
    Hills, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development v. Gautreaux et al.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Motion of Housing Authority of Elgin, 111., for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae denied.


text:
    No. 74-5822.
    Hampton, aka Byers v. United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 420 U. S. 1003.] Motion for appointment of counsel granted. It is ordered that David A. Lang, Esquire, of St. Louis, Mo., be, and he is hereby, appointed to serve as counsel for petitioner in this case.


text:
    No. 74-1028.
    Terzian v. United States.
   Motion for leave to file petition for writ of certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6047.
    Brown v. Britt, Warden, et al.
   Motion for leave to file petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.


text:
    No. 74-1049.
    Sullivan, Corrections Commissioner, et al. v. Johnson, U. S. District Judge.
   Motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition denied.


text:
    No. 74-940.
    No. 74-949.
    Colorado River Water Conservation District et al. v. United States; and Akin et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari granted. Cases consolidated and a total of one hour allotted for oral argument.


text:
    No. 74-5808.
    Francis v. Henderson, Warden.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 73-1175.
    Berkowitz et al. v. United States et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 73-6493.
    Velazquez v. United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-193.
    Wisconsin v. National Liberty Life Insurance Co.
   Sup. Ct. Wis. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-519.
    Frankel v. American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc.
   Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-922.
    Howard v. California.
   Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-810.
    Delp v. Ohio.
   Ct. App. Ohio, Columbiana County. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-923.
    Ferrara v. United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-925.
    Maita v. Whitmore, Sheriff.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-934.
    Hueston et al. v. New York.
   Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-951.
    Bohn et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-953.
    Schullo et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-967.
    Cartier v. Secretary of State et al.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-995.
    Ciraolo v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-994.
    School Committee of Springfield v. Board of Education et al.
   Sup. Jud. Ct. Mass. Cer-

tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1034.
    Bain et ux. v. May Department Stores Co. et al.
   Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-964.
    One 1973 Cadillac Fleetwood et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-972.
    Honneus v. United States.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1046.
    Blankner v. City of Chicago et al.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1071.
    Yellowstone Pine Co. v. United States et al.
   Ct. Cl. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1101.
    Globe Indemnity Co. v. Williams.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1104.
    Citizens Committee for Faraday Wood et al. v. Lindsay et al.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari

denied.


text:
    No. 74-1108.
    Republic Industries, Inc. v. Electronics Corporation of America.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1111.
    United States Steel Corp. v. Dickerson et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1118.
    Chugach Native Assn. et al. v. Central Council of Tlingit & Haida Indians of Alaska et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1119.
    Alabama et al. v. Newman et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1135.
    Packard v. California et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1146.
    Cia de Nav. Mar. Netumar v. Conceicao et al.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1147.
    Harwell, Administratrix v. Westchester Fire Insurance Co., a Division of Crum & Forster Insurance Cos.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari de-

nied.


text:
    No. 74-1149.
    First National Bank & Trust Co., Chickasha, Oklahoma v. Continental Insurance Co.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1154.
    Whitney et al. v. Tsosie et ux.
   Ct. App. N. M. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1225.
    Dorgan, Tax Commissioner of North Dakota v. Messner et ux.
   Sup. Ct. N. D. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-5854.
    Harshaw v. United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-5861.
    Ouzts v. Maryland National Insurance Co. et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-5872.
    Johnson v. United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-5956.
    Mundt v. United States.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-5966.
    Serrano v. United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-5971.
    Spivey v. United States.
   C. A. 10th

Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-5977.
    Papadakis v. United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-5990.
    Thomas v. Estelle, Corrections Director.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-5999.
    Calhoun v. United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6002.
    Foster v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6008.
    Kurtz v. United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6025.
    Hinchman v. Local Union 130, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers.
   Sup. Ct. La. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6026.
    Morefield v. United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6056.
    Beckham, aka Motley, et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6057.
    Getz et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6067.
    Hutsell v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6069.
    Jones v. United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6070.
    No. 74-6095.
    Barfield v. United States; and Hales v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6081.
    Testamark v. Vincent, Correctional Superintendent.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6130.
    Wooden v. Vincent, Correctional Superintendent.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6132.
    Owens v. Garrison, Warden.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6139.
    Livingston v. Civil Service Commission of the City of Tucson et al.
   Ct. App. Ariz. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6157.
    Wicks v. Gray, Prison Superintendent.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6165.
    Johnson v. Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6170.
    Junco v. New York.
   Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6173.
    Zanders v. Texas.
   Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6174.
    Bussey v. Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, et al.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6179.
    Gunter v. New Mexico.
   Ct. App. N. M. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6183.
    LeMaster v. California.
   Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6200.
    Prostrollo v. Bowen et al.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1142.
    SCHLESINGER, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, et al. v. United States District Court for the District of Columbia.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Blackmun would grant certiorari.


text:
    No. 74-903.
    Dyke v. Georgia.
   Sup. Ct. Ga. Certiorari denied. Mr. Justice Douglas, being of the view that any state or federal ban on, or regulation of, obscenity is prohibited by the Constitution, Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476, 508-514 (1957) (Douglas, J., dissenting) ; Miller v. California, 413 U. S. 15, 42-47 (1973) (Douglas, J., dissenting); Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49, 70-73 (1973) (Douglas, J., dissenting), would grant certiorari and summarily reverse the judgment.

Mr. Justice Brennan,

with whom Mr. Justice Stewart and Mr. Justice Marshall join,

dissenting.

Petitioner was convicted in the Criminal Court of Fulton County, Ga., of exhibiting an allegedly obscene film in violation of Ga. Code Ann. § 26-2101 (1972), which provides in pertinent part as follows:

“(a) A person commits the offense of distributing obscene materials when he . . . exhibits or otherwise disseminates to any person any obscene material of any description, knowing the obscene nature thereof ...

“Obscene” is defined in § 26-2101 (b), which provides in pertinent part:

“(b) Material is obscene if considered as a whole, applying community standards, its predominant appeal is to prurient interest, that is, a shameful or morbid interest in nudity, sex or excretion, and utterly without redeeming social value and if, in addition, it goes substantially beyond customary limits of candor in describing or representing such matters.”

The Supreme Court of Georgia affirmed.

It is my view that “at least in the absence of distribution to juveniles or obtrusive exposure to unconsenting adults, the First and Fourteenth Amendments prohibit the State and Federal Governments from attempting wholly to suppress sexually oriented materials on the basis of their allegedly 'obscene’ contents.” Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49, 113 (1973) (Brennan, J., dissenting). It is clear that, tested by that constitutional standard, the definition of “obscene” contained in § 26-2101 is unconstitutionally overbroad and therefore invalid on its face. For the reasons stated in my dissent in Miller v. California, 413 U. S. 15, 47 (1973), I would therefore grant certiorari, and, since the judgment of the Supreme Court of Georgia was rendered after Miller, reverse. In that circumstance, I have no occasion to consider whether the other questions presented merit plenary review. See Heller v. New York, 413 U. S. 483, 494 (1973) (Brennan, J., dissenting).

Finally, it does not appear that the obscenity of the disputed materials was adjudged by applying local community standards. Based on my dissent in Hamling v. United States, 418 U. S. 87, 141 (1974), I believe that, consistent with the Due Process Clause, petitioner must be given an opportunity to have his case decided on, and to introduce evidence relevant to, the legal standard upon which his conviction has ultimately come to depend. Thus, even on its own terms, the Court should vacate the judgment below and remand for a determination whether petitioner should be afforded a new trial under local community standards.

       Although four of us would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment, the Justices who join this opinion do not insist that the case be decided on the merits.


text:
    No. 74-5911.
    Dachsteiner v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Brennan,

with whom Mr. Justice Stewart and Mr. Justice Marshall join,

dissenting.

Petitioner was convicted in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California of using the mails to distribute allegedly obscene materials in violation of 18 U. S. C. § 1461, which provides in pertinent part as follows:

“Every obscene, lewd, lascivious, indecent, filthy or vile article, matter, thing, device, or substance; . . .
“Is declared to be nonmailable matter and shall not be conveyed in the mails or delivered from any post office or by any letter carrier.
“Whoever knowingly uses the mails for the mailing ... of anything declared by this section ... to be nonmailable, . . . shall be fined not more than $5,000 or imprisoned not more than five years . . . .”

The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed.

I adhere to my dissent in United States v. Orito, 413 U. S. 139, 147 (1973), in which, speaking of 18 U. S. C. § 1462, which is similar in scope to § 1461,1 expressed the view that “[wjhatever the extent of the Federal Government’s power to bar the distribution of allegedly obscene material to juveniles or the offensive exposure of such material to unconsenting adults, the statute before us is clearly overbroad and unconstitutional on its face.” 413 U. S., at 147-148. For the reasons stated in my dissent in Miller v. California, 413 U. S. 15, 47 (1973), I would therefore grant certiorari, and since the judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit was rendered after Onto, reverse. In that circumstance, I have no occasion to consider whether the other questions presented merit plenary review. See Heller v. New York, 413 U. S. 483, 494 (1973) (Brennan, J., dissenting).

Finally, it does not appear from the petition and response that the obscenity of the disputed materials was adjudged by applying local community standards. Based on my dissent in Hamling v. United States, 418 U. S. 87, 141 (1974), I believe that, consistent with the Due Process Clause, petitioner must be given an opportunity to have his case decided on, and to introduce evidence relevant to, the legal standard upon which his conviction has ultimately come to depend. Thus, even on its own terms, the Court should vacate the judgment below and remand for a determination whether petitioner should be afforded a new trial under local community standards.


text:
    No. 74-751.

    Cox, Former Assistant Director for Treatment, Virginia Division of Corrections, et al. v. Cook,
   420 U. S. 734;


text:
    No. 74-5741.
    Hardwick v. Caldwell, Warden,
   420 U. S. 996; and


text:
    No. 74-5810.
    May v. United States,
   420 U. S. 996. Petitions for rehearing denied.


text:
    No. 74-5793.
    Padilla v. New Mexico,
   420 U. S. 937. Motion for leave to file petition for rehearing denied.


text:
    May 5, 1975
    No. 74-1113.
    National Steel Carriers Assn., Inc. v. United States et al.
   Appeal from D. C. E. D. Mich, dismissed under this Court’s Rule 60.


text:
    May 12, 1975

    No. 74-912.
    Stacy et al. v. Mahan et al.

       Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of cases in which orders hereinafter reported were announced on this date, with the exception of the following:
      No. 74-912, Stacy v. Mahan, infra, this page; No. 74-932, Lekometros v. United States, infra, p. 962; No. 74-955, Art Theater Guild, Inc. v. Ohio ex rel. Schoen, infra, p. 957; No. 74-956, Art Theater Guild, Inc. v. Ohio ex rel. Anderson, infra, p. 957; No. 74-984, Maver v. Loesch, infra, p. 962; No. 74-989, United States Clay Producers Traffic Assn., Inc. v. Central of Georgia R. Co., infra, p. 957; No. 74-1021, Rosselli v. United States, infra, p. 962; No. 74—1029, Chicago & Eastern Illinois R. Co. v. United States, infra, this page; No. 74-1033, Dann v. Johnston, infra, p. 962; No. 74r-1035, Stitt v. United States, infra, p. 962; No. 74-1084, Anderson v. Langenwalter, infra, p. 962; No. 74-1093, Riley v. Estate of Riley, infra, p. 971; No. 74—1095, Denton v. United States, infra, p. 963; No. 74-1102, National Maritime Union of America, AFL-CIO v. National Labor Relations Board, infra, p. 963; No. 74-1125, Bernstein v. United States, infra, p. 962; No. 74-1131, Kalamazoo Board of Education v. Oliver, infra, p. 963; No. 74-1132, Michigan State Board of Education v. Oliver, infra, p. 963; No. 74-1148, Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., Inc. v. Cottrell, infra, p. 961; No. 74-1158, Smart v. Texas Power & Light Co., infra, p. 958; No. 74-1188, Kerrigan v. Morgan, infra, p. 963; No. 74-1190, White v. Morgan, infra, p. 963; No. 74-1196, Kline v. Coldwell, Banker & Co., infra, p. 963; No. 74-1197, White v. McIntosh, infra, p. 957; No. 74-1199, Brown v. Wood, infra, p. 963; No. 74-1210, Sadlak v. Gilligan, infra, this page; and No. 74-6227, John v. United States, infra, p. 962.

   Affirmed on appeal from D. C. E. D. Va.


text:
    No. 74-1029.
    Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad Co. et al. v. United States et al.
   Affirmed on appeal from D. C. N. D. 111.


text:
    No. 74-1210.
    Sadlak v. Gilligan, Governor of Ohio, et al.
   Affirmed on appeal from D. C. N. D. Ohio.


text:
    No. 74-989.
    United States Clay Producers Traffic Assn., Inc., et al. v. Central of Georgia Railroad Co. et al.
   Affirmed on appeal from D. C. D. C. Mr. Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of this appeal.


text:
    No. 74-955.
    No. 74-956.
    Art Theater Guild, Inc., et al. v. Ohio ex rel. Schoen; and Art Theater Guild, Inc., et al. v. Ohio ex rel. Anderson.
   Appeals from Ct. App. Ohio, Lucas County, dismissed for failure to file notices of appeal within the time provided by this Court’s Rule 11 and 28 U. S. C. § 2101 (c).


text:
    No. 74-1197.
    White v. McIntosh et al.
   Appeal from C. A. 9th Cir. dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-5852.
    Whitmarsh v. Massachusetts.
   Appeal from Dist. Ct. N. Norfolk County dismissed for want of jurisdiction.


text:
    No. 74-6015.
    Cross v. Villegas et al.
   Appeal from Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist., dismissed for want of substantial federal question.


text:
    No. 74-6233.
    Manion v. Milbren, Inc.
   Appeal from C. A. 4th Cir. dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-691.
    Schmidt, Secretary, Department of Health and Social Services of Wisconsin, et al. v.
      Lessard.
   Appeal from D. C. E. D. Wis. Motion of appellee for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Judgment vacated and case remanded for further consideration in light of Huffman v. Pursue, Ltd., 420 U. S. 592 (1975).


text:
    No. 74-952.
    Blanton, Governor of Tennessee, et al. v. Americans United for the Separation of Church and State et al.
   D. C. M. D. Tenn. The Court, being advised that after probable jurisdiction herein was noted on March 24, 1975, 420 U. S. 989, the State’s Tuition Grant statutory program was amended, judgment vacated and case remanded to District Court for reconsideration in light of statutory changes effected

since the litigation was instituted.


text:
    No. 74-1158.
    Smart v. Texas Power & Light Co. et al.
   Appeal from D. C. N. D. Tex. Judgment vacated and case remanded so that a fresh order may be entered from which a timely appeal may be taken to the United States Court of Appeals. Gonzalez v. Automatic Employees Credit Union, 419 U. S. 90 (1974).


text:
    No. 35, Orig.
    United States v. Maine et al.
   The United States has moved the Court to retain jurisdiction in this case to entertain such further proceedings, enter such orders, and issue such writs as may from time to time be deemed necessary or advisable to give proper force and effect to the decision of March 17, 1975, and to the Court’s opinion issued on that date [420 U. S. 515]. Motion of the United States granted. The parties, jointly or separately, are requested within 60 days to submit for the Court’s consideration a proposed decree effectuating the March 17 decision and opinion, retaining jurisdiction over such supplemental proceedings as may be necessary or advisable and, more specifically, making provision for appropriate proceedings in this Court to establish the coastline of defendant States and the seaward boundary between the seabed lands of the States and those of the United States.


text:
    No. A-928.
    Blackburn v. City of Maple Heights.
   Sup. Ct. Ohio. Application for stay of execution and enforcement of judgment of Garfield Heights Municipal Court entered on December 5, 1973, presented to Mr. Justice Stewart, and by him referred to the Court, denied.


text:
    No. D-36.
    In re Disbarment of Bomstein.
   It having been reported to this Court that Stanley J. Bomstein, of Baltimore, Md., has resigned with prejudice from the Court of Appeals of Maryland, and this Court by order of January 20, 1975 [419 U. S. 1118], having suspended the said Stanley J. Bomstein from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred;

And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that the time within which to file a return has expired;

It is ordered that the said Stanley J. Bomstein, be, and he is hereby, disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.


text:
    No. D-37.
    In re Disbarment of Hankinson.
   It having been reported to this Court that Christopher Ker Hankinson, of Vienna, Va., has been disbarred- from the practice of law in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, and this Court by order of January 20, 1975 [419 U. S. 1119], having suspended the said Christopher Ker Hankinson from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred;

And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that the time within which to file a return has expired;

It is ordered that the said Christopher Ker Hankinson be, and he is hereby, disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.


text:
    No. D-39.
    In re Disbarment of Rosenberg.
   It having been reported to this Court that Harvey Rosenberg, of Silver Spring, Md., has been disbarred from the practice of law in the Court of Appeals of Maryland and this Court by order of February 24, 1975 [420 U. S. 941], having suspended the said Harvey Rosenberg from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred;

And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that the time within which to file a return has expired;

It is ordered that the said Harvey Rosenberg be, and he is hereby, disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.


text:
    No. 74-492.
    Ohio v. Gallagher.
   Sup. Ct. Ohio. [Certiorari granted, 420 U. S. 1003.] Motion of the Attorney General of California for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae denied.


text:
    No. 73-1380.
    No. 73-1666.
    No. 73-1667.
    Chemehuevi Tribe of Indians et al. v. Federal Power Commission et al.; Arizona Public Service Co. et al. v. Chemehuevi Tribe of Indians et al.; and Federal Power Commission v. Chemehuevi Tribe of Indians et al.,
   420 U. S. 395. Motion of Chemehuevi Tribe of Indians et al. to retax costs denied.


text:
    No. 74-775.
    City of New Orleans et al. v. Dukes, dba Louisiana Concessions.
   C. A. 5th Cir. [Probable jurisdiction postponed, ante, p. 908.] Motion of appellee for appointment of counsel denied.


text:
    No. 74-6027.
    No. 74-6235.
    No. 74-6237.
    Begun v. United States; Begun v. State Board of Medical Examiners et al.; and Myles v. Rydel, Workhouse Superintendent.
   Motions for leave to file petitions for writs of certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6314.
    No. 74-6332.
    No. 74-6350.
    Mills v. Ault, Corrections Director; Cole v. Tennessee; and Smith v. Putman, Warden.
   Motions

for leave to file petitions for writs of habeas corpus denied.


text:
    No. 74-5657.
    No. 74-6019.
    No. 74-6142.
    Reid v. United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit; Steele v. Supreme Court of Colorado et al.; and Sturgeon v. Heaney, U. S. Circuit Judge, et al.
   Motions for leave to file petitions for writs of mandamus denied.


text:
    No. 74-1148.
    Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., Inc. v. Cottrell, Health Officer of Mississippi.
   Appeal from D. C. S. D. Miss. Probable jurisdiction noted.


text:
    No. 74-1033.
    Dann, Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks v. Johnston.
   C. C. P. A. Motion of Computer & Business Equipment Manufacturers Assn. (CBEMA) for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae and certiorari granted. Mr. Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and petition.

       See also note, supra, p. 956.


text:
    No. 74-1047.
    Hills, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development v. Gautreaux et al.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 74-932.
    No. 74-1125.
    No. 74-6227.
    Lekometros v. United States; Bernstein v. United States; and John v. United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-984.
    Maver v. Loesch et al.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1021.
    Rosselli v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1035.
    Stitt v. United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir.

Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1084.
    Anderson v. Langenwalter et al.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1095.
    Denton v. United States.
   Ct. Cl. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1102.
    National Maritime Union of America, AFL-CIO v. National Labor Relations Board et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1131.
    No. 74-1132.
    Kalamazoo Board of Education v. Oliver, by Jones, et al.; and Michigan State Board of Education et al. v. Oliver, by Jones, et al.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Cer-

tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1188.
    No. 74-1190.
    Kerrigan et al. v. Morgan et al.; and White, Mayor of Boston, et al. v. Morgan et al.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1196.
    Kline et al. v. Coldwell, Banker & Co. et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1199.
    Brown et ux. v. Wood, Judge, et al.
   Sup. Ct. Ark. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-375.
    Shell Chemical Co. v. National Labor Relations Board et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-736.
    Washington Research Project, Inc. v. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare et al.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-906.
    Parker v. Estelle, Corrections Director.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-950.
    Barrett v. United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1014.
    Meister et ux. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1050.
    Lichtig et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1051.
    Von Lewinski v. Pepitone, Acting Director, Selective Service System, et al.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1056.
    Droback v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1066.
    Cirami et al. v. United States.
   C. A.

2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1082.
    In re Grossgold.
   Sup. Ct. 111. Cer-

tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1127.
    Fujita v. California.
   Ct. App. Cal, 4th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1134.
    Pavlicka v. New York University Medical Center.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1150.
    Sidor v. Sellman.
   Super. Ct. N. J. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1157.
    In re Berlant.
   Sup. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1175.
    Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1176.
    Brubaker et al. v. Board of Education, School District No. 149, Cook County, Illinois, et al.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1182.
    United Broadcasting Co., Inc., et al. v. Armes.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1183.
    Easterbrook v. New York.
   Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1186.
    Moya et vir v. Chilili Cooperative Assn., Inc., et al.
   Sup. Ct. N. M. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1191.
    Iligan Integrated Steel Mills, Inc., et al. v. The John Weyerhaeuser et al.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1208.
    Tanglewood Mall, Inc. v. Chase Manhattan Bank (National Association), Trustee.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1211.
    North American Rockwell Corp. v. Knapp.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1212.
    St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Hawkeye Chemical Co. et al.
   C. A.. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1230.
    Snelling v. Cheltenham National Bank.
   Super. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1291.
    Fred v. Oklahoma.
   Ct. Crim. App. Okla. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-5800.
    Moody v. United States Board of Parole.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-5890.
    Magee v. Britt, Warden.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-5909.
    Kimble v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-5919.
    Spychala v. Gunn, Warden.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-5922.
    Crosier v. California.
   Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-5925.
    Norman, aka Ana v. Mississippi.
   Sup. Ct. Miss. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-5948.
    Clark v. Rodriguez, Warden.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-5955.
    Turley v. Missouri.
   Ct. App. Mo., St. Louis District. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-5958.
    Jeffery v. New York.
   App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 1st Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-5997.
    Tooten v. Shewn, Attorney General of Florida, et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-5998.
    Dinsio v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6020.
    Terrell v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6022.
    Clark v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6032.
    Battles v. United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6033.
    Sullivan v. Weinberger, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare.
   C. A. 5th Cir.

Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6036.
    Crew v. United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6037.
    Medina et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6041.
    Barnhill v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6044.
    Isaac, aka Pitts v. United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6048.
    Martin et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6050.
    Ruff v. United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6052.
    Pigman v. United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6062.
    Parker v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6075.
    Canseco v. United States.
   C. A. 5th

Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6074.
    Rodriguez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6077.
    Munn v. United States.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6083.
    Hines v. United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6087.
    Taylor et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6089.
    Escamilla v. Bogue, U. S. District Judge.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6093.
    Tate v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6097.
    Berman v. United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6104.
    Buchert v. United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6111.
    Smith v. United States.
   C. A. 5th

Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6117.
    Gaus v. United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6122.
    Harrelson v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6123.
    Perkins v. Ball, Social Security Commissioner, et al.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6131.
    Morrow v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6134.
    Culotta v. Pickett.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6137.
    Robinson v. Vincent, Correctional Superintendent.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6140.
    Mader v. United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6144.
    Havansek v. United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6163.
    Fields v. United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6187.
    Williams v. Fortner, Prison Superintendent.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6190.
    Greenlee v. North Carolina.
   Sup. Ct. N. C. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6192.
    Hughes v. Oklahoma.
   Ct. Crim. App. Okla. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6197.
    Patterson v. Henderson, Warden.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6208.
    Wright v. Lueddemann et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. .


text:
    No. 74-6210.
    Braxton v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6213.
    Ellerbee v. Marlboro County et al.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6218.
    Rodgers v. LaVallee, Correctional Superintendent.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6214.
    Null v. Wainwright, Corrections Director.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6219.
    Lugo v. New York.
   App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 1st Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6222.
    Smith et al. v. Link, Governor of North Dakota, et al.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6225.
    Olden v. Gunn, Warden, et al.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6230.
    Hampton v. Karfeld, Trustee.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6239.
    Johnson v. Department of Water and Power, City of Los Angeles.
   Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6242.
    Stanley v. Warden, State Prison of Southern Michigan.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6243.
    Hom v. Clanon, Medical Facility Superintendent.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6245.
    Gersbacher v. Illinois.
   App. Ct. 111., 5th Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6250.
    Hill v. City of Detroit et al.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6258.
    Tahl v. Gunn, Warden.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6275.
    Schneider v. Oklahoma et al.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6279.
    Vitoratos v. Cardwell, Warden.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6266.
    Rolon v. Regan, Prison Superintendent.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6365.
    Davis v. Chattanooga Federal Savings & Loan Assn. Corp. et al.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-863.
    Pennsylvania v. White.
   Sup. Ct. Pa. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied, it appearing the judgment below rests upon adequate state grounds.


text:
    No. 74-1093.
    Riley et al. v. Estate of Riley.
   Sup. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied, it appearing that the judgment below rests upon adequate state grounds.


text:
    No. 74-1172.
    Garcia et al. v. Gray et al.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Brennan and Mr. Justice Marshall would grant certiorari.


text:
    No. 74-5912.
    Hurst v. Hunt, Corrections Director, et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Stewart would grant certiorari.


text:
    No. 74-6177.
    Perkins v. Kentucky.
   Ct. App. Ky. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Stewart would grant certiorari.


text:
    No. 73-296.
    Huffman et al. v. Pursue, Ltd.,
   420 U. S. 592;


text:
    No. 74-576.
    Sterrett et al. v. Taylor et al.,
   420 U. S. 983: and


text:
    No. 74-680.
    Blumberg v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Co.,
   420 U. S. 927. Petitions for rehearing denied.


text:
    No. 74-5711.
    O’Brien v. United States District Court for the Central District of California,
   420 U. S.1005;


text:
    No. 74-5812.
    Schall et al. v. United States,
   420 U. S. 993;


text:
    No. 74-5886.
    Strawn v. United States,
   420 U. S. 1006; and


text:
    No. 74-6011.
    Porzuczek, Guardian v. County of San Mateo et al.,
   420 U. S. 1007. Petitions for rehearing denied.


text:
    No. 9, Orig.
    United States v. Louisiana et al. (Louisiana Boundary Case),

       See also note, supra, p. 956.

   420 U. S. 529. Petition for rehearing denied.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 74-97.
    Diamond et al. v. Bland, Sheriff, et al.,
   419 U. S. 885 and 1097. Motion for leave to file second petition for rehearing denied.


text:
    No. 74-893.
    The Svendborg et al. v. Marine Engine Specialties Corp.,
   420 U. S. 964;


text:
    No. 74-5407.
    Massengale v. United States,
   419 U. S. 1091; and


text:
    No. 74-5981.
    Konjevic et vir v. Florida Department of Professional and Occupational Regulation,
   420 U. S. 995. Motions for leave to file petitions for rehearing denied.


text:
    May 19, 1975
    No. 74-1120.
    Murgia v. Massachusetts Board of Retirement et al.
   Affirmed on appeal from D. C. Mass.


text:
    No. 74-1081.
    Hansen v. Board of Inspectors of Election, 8th Election District, 68th Assembly District of New York, et al.
   Appeal from App. Div.,

Sup. Ct. N. Y., 1st Jud. Dept., dismissed for want of

substantial federal question.


text:
    No. 74-1178.
    Collins et al. v. Carey, Governor of New York, et al.
   Appeal from Ct. App. N. Y. dismissed for want of substantial federal question.

Mr. Justice Douglas, Mr. Justice White, and Mr. Justice Marshall would note probable jurisdiction and set case for oral argument.


text:
    No. 74-1193.
    Sanford et al. v. Carey, Governor of New York, et al.
   Appeal from Ct. App. N. Y. dismissed for want of substantial federal question.

Mr. Justice Douglas, Mr. Justice White, and Mr. Justice Marshall would note probable jurisdiction and set case for oral argument.


text:
    No. 74-1255.
    Miller v. California.
   Appeal from App. Dept., Super. Ct. Cal., County of Orange, dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas would note probable jurisdiction and set case for oral argument.


text:
    No. 74-6249.
    Conrad et ux. v. Meyer & Kaucher et al.
   Appeal from C. A. 8th Cir. dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.


text:
    No. A-365 (74-6458).
    Shadd v. Hogan, Warden.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Application for bail, presented to Mr. Justice Douglas, and by him referred to the Court, denied.


text:
    No. 74-712.
    United States v. Bornstein et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. [Certiorari granted, 420 U. S. 906.] Motion of respondent Page for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis denied. Snider v. All State Administrators, Inc., 414 U. S. 685 (1974).


text:
    No. 74-884.
    United States v. Powell.
   C. A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 420 U. S. 971.] Motions of respondent for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis and for appointment of counsel granted. It is ordered that Jerry J. Moberg, Esquire, of Moses Lake, Wash., is appointed to serve as counsel for respondent in this case.


text:
    No. 74-1107.
    Cappaert et al. v. United States et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Motion to defer consideration of petition for writ of certiorari granted pending further order of this Court.


text:
    No. 74-6224.
    No. 74-6267.
    Collier v. United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit; and Callinan et al. v. Garrity, U. S. District Judge, et al.
   Motions for leave to file petitions for writs of mandamus denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.


text:
    No. 74-1044.
    Massachusetts Board of Retirement et al. v. Murgia.
   Appeal from D. C. Mass. Probable jurisdiction noted.


text:
    No. 74-1110.
    No. 74-1124.
    Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights Organization et al. v. Simon, Secretary of the Treasury, et al.; and Simon, Secretary of the Treasury, et al. v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights Organization et al.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari granted. Cases consolidated, and a total of one hour allotted for oral argument.


text:
    No. 74-896.
    Burlington Northern, Inc. v. American Railway Supervisors Assn, et al.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1006.
    Lewis et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1030.
    Wilson v. Oregon State Bar et al.
   Sup. Ct. Ore. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1052.
    Hunt et al. v. United States.
   C. A.

5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1075.
    Devitt v. United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1080.
    No. 74-1114.
    Lancaster et al. v. United States; and Del Pietro v. United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1100.
    Brady v. United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1112.
    Price v. Cotton, Trustee.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1117.
    Condor Operating Co. et al. v. Zarb, Administrator, Federal Energy Administration, et al.
   Temp. Emerg. Ct. App. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1126.
    Local Union 396, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehouse-men & Helpers of America, et al. v. National Labor Relations Board.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1155.
    Penn-Dixie Cement Corp. et al. v. Schlick.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1177.
    Milhan v. Milhan.
   Sup. Ct. Cal.

Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1226.
    McBeth et ux. v. United Press International, Inc.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1236.
    Tyson v. Virgin Islands National Bank.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-5984.
    Monsivais v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6066.
    Williams v. United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6029.
    Sarles v. Florida.
   Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6000.
    Trujillo-Hernandez v. Farrell, Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service, et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6068.
    No. 74-6169.
    Entrekin v. United States; and Entrekin v. United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6092.
    Borasky v. United States.
   Ct. Cl. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6096.
    Tooker v. United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6106.
    Silman, aka Long v. United States.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6125.
    Mason v. Tehan, U. S. District Judge, et al.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6127.
    Stroy v. United States.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6129.
    Hamilton v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6136.
    Bolar v. United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6141.
    Redmayne v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6155.
    Dowd v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6178.
    Boruski v. United States.
   Ct. Cl. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-998.
    Fowler et al. v. Oregon.
   Ct. App. Ore. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas would grant certiorari.


text:
    No. 74-1011.
    Michaelson v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas would grant certiorari.


text:
    No. 74-1059.
    No. 74-1223.
    Forth Corp. et al. v. Allegheny Airlines, Inc., et al.; and United States v. Allegheny Airlines, Inc., et al.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas would grant certiorari.


text:
    No. 74 1060.
    Forth Corp. et al. v. Allegheny Airlines, Inc., et al.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas would grant certiorari.


text:
    No. 74-1083.
    Schaefer v. United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas would grant certiorari.


text:
    No. 74-1105.
    Forrest et al., dba Forrest & Kiefer v. Capital Building & Loan Assn. et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas would grant certiorari.


text:
    No. 74-1109.
    Procter & Gamble Co. et al. v. City of Chicago.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas would grant certiorari.


text:
    No. 74-1200.
    Duffy v. Barnes et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas would grant certiorari.


text:
    No. 74-1238.
    Department of Revenue of Washington v. Carrington Co.
   Sup. Ct. Wash. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas would grant certiorari.


text:
    No. 74-5961.
    Cormier v. Louisiana.
   Sup. Ct. La. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas would grant certiorari.


text:
    No. 74-6164.
    Galloway v. United States.
   Ct. App. D. C. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas would grant certiorari.


text:
    No. 74-1138.
    Kalb et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 74-6273.
    Ware v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 74-6274.
    Verga v. Verga, aka Virga.
   Super. Ct. N. J. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 74-6276.
    Smith, Trustee in Bankruptcy v. Bryant et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 74-6288.
    Wiley v. McManus, Warden.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 74-6280.
    Mackey v. Henderson, Correctional Superintendent.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 74-6284.
    Hammond v. California.
   Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 74-6285.
    No. 74-6286.
    Sinclair v. Henderson, Warden; and Sinclair v. Henderson, Warden.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 74-6290.
    Quick v. California.
   Ct. App. Cal., 4th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 74-6291.
    Dedmon v. Enomoto, Corrections Director, et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 74-1116.
    Smith v. United States.
   C. A. 7th

Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Stewart and Mr. Justice Marshall would grant certiorari.


text:
    No. 74-1156.
    Frilette et al. v. Kimberlin et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice White would grant certiorari. Mr. Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 74-514.
    Johnson v. United States,
   420 U. S. 972;


text:
    No. 74-767.

    Chu v. United States,
   420 U. S.' 940;


text:
    No. 74-844.
    Oram v. General American Oil Company of Texas et al.,
   420 U. S. 964;


text:
    No. 74-1002.
    Taylor’s Welding Service, Inc., et al. v. Bell,
   ante, p. 911;


text:
    No. 74-6078.
    Darnold v. Clanon, Medical Facility Superintendent,
   ante, p. 919; and


text:
    No. 74-6232.
    Harrelson v. United States et al.,
   ante, p. 928. Petitions for rehearing denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.


text:
    No. 74-5573.
    Ronan v. Briggs et al.,
   420 U. S. 911. Motion for leave to file petition for rehearing denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.


text:
    May 27, 1975
    No. 74-339.
    Wolman et al. v. Essex et al.
   Appeal from D. C. S. D. Ohio. Judgment vacated and case remanded for further consideration in light of Meek v. Pittenger, ante, p. 349.

Me. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this appeal.


text:
    No. 74-1221.
    Civil Service Commission of New York et al. v. Snead.
   Appeal from D. C. S. D. N. Y. Judgment vacated and case remanded for consideration of question of mootness. Mr. Justice Douglas would note probable jurisdiction and set case for oral argument.

Mr. Justice Brennan, Mr. Justice Marshall, and Mr. Justice Blackmun would affirm the judgment.


text:
    No. 74-1153.
    Kacher v. Pittsburgh National Bank et al.
   Appeal from C. A. 3d Cir. dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1258.
    E. F. Johnson Co. v. Commissioner of Taxation.
   Appeal from Sup. Ct. Minn, dismissed for want of substantial federal question. Mr. Justice Blackmun took no part in the consideration or decisior of this appeal.


text:
    No. 74-506.
    Taylor et al. v. Perini, Correctionai Superintendent, et al.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorar granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness Society, ante, p. 240.

Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


text:
    No. 74-558.

    Skehan v. Board of Trustees of Bloomsburg State College et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness Society, ante, p. 240, and Wood v. Strickland, 420 U. S. 308 (1975).

Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


text:
    No. 74-1247.
    Stanton, Administrator, Department of Public Welfare of Indiana, et al. v. Green et al.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Motion of respondents for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and certiorari granted. Judgment vacated and case remanded for further consideration in light of Burns v. Alcala, 420 U. S. 575 (1975).

Mr. Justice Douglas would deny the petition for writ of certiorari.


text:
    No. A-931.
    Bringe v. Collins et al.
   Application for stay of execution and enforcement of judgment of Court of Appeals of Maryland, presented to Mr. Justice Marshall, and by him referred to the Court, denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.


text:
    No. D 32.
    In re Disbarment of Germaise.
   It having been reported to this Court that Irwin L. Germaise, of New York, N. Y., has been disbarred from the practice of law in all of the courts in the State of New York, and this Court by order of January 13, 1975 [419 U. S. 1102], having suspended the said Irwin L. Germaise from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred ;

It is ordered that the said Irwin L. Germaise, be, and he is hereby, disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.

Me. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this matter.


text:
    No. D-33.
    In re Disbarment of McDonald.
   It having been reported to this Court that Ronald F. McDonald, Jr., of Rockville, Md., has been disbarred from the practice of law in the Court of Appeals of Maryland, and this Court by order of January 20, 1975 [419 U. S. 1118], having suspended the said Ronald F. McDonald, Jr., from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred;

And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that the time within which to file a return has expired;

It is ordered that the said Ronald F. McDonald, Jr., be, and he is hereby, disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.

Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this matter.


text:
    No. D-42.
    In re Disbarment of Dean.
   It having been reported to this Court that John W. Dean III, of Los Angeles, Cal., has been disbarred from the practice of law in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, and this Court by order of February 24, 1975 [420 U. S. 942], having suspended the said John W. Dean III, from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred;

And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that the time within which to file a return has expired;

It is ordered that the said John W. Dean III, be, and he is hereby, disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.

Me. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Rehnquist took no part in the consideration or decision of this matter.


text:
    No. 74-492.
    Ohio v. Gallagher.
   Sup. Ct. Ohio. [Certiorari granted, 420 U. S. 1003.] Motion of respondent for appointment of counsel granted and Jack T. Schwarz, Esquire, of Dayton, Ohio, is appointed to serve as counsel for respondent in this case.

Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.


text:
    No. 74-850.
    Weinberger, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare v. Weber.
   C. A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 420 U. S. 989.] Peter David Ehrenhaft, Esquire, of Washington, D. C., is invited to brief and argue this case as amicus curiae in support of judgment below.

Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this order.


text:
    No. 74-6457.
    Goodspeed v. Griggs, Institution Superintendent.
   Motion for leave to file petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.


text:
    No. 74-878.
    No. 74-879.
    National League of Cities et al. v. Dunlop, Secretary of Labor; and California v. Dunlop, Secretary of Labor.
   Appeals from D. C. D. C. [Probable jurisdiction noted, 420 U. S. 906.] Cases restored to calendar for reargument.


text:
    No. 74-1254.
    Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, et al. v. Mobil Oil Corp., Marine Transportation Department, Gulf-East Coast Operations.
   C. A. 5th Cir. The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.


text:
    No. 74-1203.
    Phelps v. United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois et al.
   Motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus denied.


text:
    No. 74-6329.
    Magee v. United States District Court for the Central District of California et al.
   Motion for leave to file petition for writ of prohibition and/or mandamus denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas would grant the motion.


text:
    No. 74-1267.
    Examining Board of Engineers, Architects and Surveyors et al. v. Flores de Otero; Examining Board of Engineers, Architects and Surveyors et al. v. Perez Nogueiro.
   Appeals from D. C. P. R. Probable jurisdiction noted. The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in these cases expressing the views of the United States. Application for stay of execution and enforcement of judgments, presented to Mr. Justice Brennan, and by him referred to the Court, granted pending issuance of judgment of this Court.

Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.


text:
    No. 74-1023.
    Kerr et al. v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 74-1245.
    Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Wetzel et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 74-1269.
    Barry, Commissioner, Suffolk County Police Department v. Dwen.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 74-768.
    Brown v. General Services Administration et al.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted.

Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 74-1141.
    United States v. Gaddis et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Motion of respondents for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 74-1216.
    Ristaino et al. v. Ross.
   C. A. 1st Cir.

Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 74-991.
    Costanza v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1019.
    Gargotto v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1054.
    Crews et al. v. North Carolina.
   Sup. Ct. N. C. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1069.
    Whitaker et ux. v. United States.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1098.
    Abbas v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1139.
    Clark et al. v. Stankivic et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1166.
    No. 74-1167.
    No. 74-1168.
    Minnesota et al. v. Minnesota Civil Liberties Union et al.; Larkin et al. v. Minnesota Civil Liberties Union et al.; and Quast et al. v. Minnesota Civil Liberties Union et al.
   Sup. Ct. Minn. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1174.
    Air Line Dispatchers’ Assn. et al. v. Civil Aeronautics Board et al.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1248.
    Armstrong Cork Co. v. Congoleum Industries, Inc.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1251.
    Thomas v. Ford Motor Co. et al.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1253.
    Howard v. Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1280.
    Nat Harrison Associates, Inc. v. Louisville Gas & Electric Co. et al.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6049.
    Webb v. Culbertson et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6073.
    Conway et al. v. Hawkins et al.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6082.
    Mitchell v. Virginia.
   Sup Ct. Va. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6107.
    Lancer v. United States.
   C. A. 3d

Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6113.
    Carter et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6146.
    Hockaday v. United States.
   Ct. App. D. C. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6148.
    Andrade-Gonzalez et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6149.
    Stevens v. United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6151.
    Isome v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6166.
    Battle v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6171.
    Ruth v. United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6180.
    No. 74-6193.
    Rico v. United States; and Salas-Martinez v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6182.
    Kenyon v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74 6189.
    Hoffman v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6198.
    Boston v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6199.
    Brinlee v. Attorney General of the United States et al.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    Np. 74-6201.
    Morandi v. United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6270.
    Resnick v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6310.
    Brantley v. Baxley et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6312.
    Carter v. Chipper’s Nut Hut, Inc.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6315.
    James v. Henderson, Correctional Superintendent.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6316.
    Burston v. Caldwell, Warden.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6317.
    Johnson v. Alabama.
   Ct. Crim. App. Ala. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6326.
    Young v. New York.
   App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 4th Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6333.
    Roll v. California.
   Sup Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6360.
    Fair v. Ball et al.
   Sup. Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6396.
    Gibson v. Henderson, Warden.
   Sup. Ct. La. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-403.
    Jordon et al. v. Gilligan, Governor of Ohio, et al.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Marshall would grant certiorari.


text:
    No. 74-543.
    Bridgeport Guardians, Inc., et al. v. Bridgeport Civil Service Commission et al.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 74757.
    Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc., et al. v. Smith, Commissioner, Tennessee Department of Transportation, et al.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 74-842.
    Tiidee Products, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board et al.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 74-1140.
    Lowe et al. v. Secretary of State et al.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 74-1173.
    Estate of Klein et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 74-1185.
    Firestone Plastics Co., Division of Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., et al. v. United States Department of Labor et al.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 74-961.
    Dillon v. Antler Land Company of Wyola et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas would grant certiorari.


text:
    No. 74-1090.
    Terrell v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas would grant certiorari.


text:
    No. 74-1164.
    Alfred A. Knopf, Inc., et al. v. Colby, Director, Central Intelligence Agency, et al.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas would grant certiorari.


text:
    No. 74-1268.
    City of Chicago et al. v. Chicago Area Military Project et al.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas would grant certiorari.


text:
    No. 74-1279.
    Sutt et al. v. First National Bank of Kansas City et al.
   Sup. Ct. Mo. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas would grant certiorari.


text:
    No. 74-6079.
    Beard v. Illinois.
   Sup. Ct. Ill. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas would grant certiorari.


text:
    No. 74-6094.
    Golon v. United States.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas would grant certiorari.


text:
    No. 74-1240.
    Weiser et al. v. White, Secretary of State of Texas.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 74-6153.
    Baechler v. United States.
   C. A.

4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas would grant certiorari.


text:
    No. 74-6305.
    Bennett v. North Carolina.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas would grant certiorari.


text:
    No. 74-1003.
    Ridens et al. v. Illinois et al.
   Sup. Ct. Ill. Certiorari denied. Mr. Justice Douglas, being of the view that any state or federal ban on, or regulation of, obscenity is prohibited by the Constitution, Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476, 508-514 (1957) (Douglas, J., dissenting); Miller v. California, 413 U. S. 15, 42-47 (1973) (Douglas, J., dissenting); Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49, 70-73 (1973) (Douglas, J., dissenting), would grant certiorari and summarily reverse the judgment.

Mr. Justice Brennan,

with whom Mr. Justice Stewart and Mr. Justice Marshall join,

dissenting.

Petitioners were convicted of selling allegedly obscene publications in violation of the Illinois Obscenity Statute, Ill. Rev. Stat., c. 38, § 11-20 (1969), and the obscenity ordinance of the city of Moline, Ill. The Illinois Supreme Court affirmed their convictions. 51 Ill. 2d 410, 282 N. E. 2d 691 (1972). We granted certiorari and remanded the case for further consideration in light of Miller v. California, 413 U. S. 15 (1973). 413 U. S. 912 (1973). On remand, the Illinois Supreme Court again affirmed the convictions.

For the reasons stated in my dissent from the remand of this case, id., at 911, and because the present judgment was rendered after Miller, I would grant certiorari and reverse.

       Although four of us would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment, the Justices who join this opinion do not insist that the case be decided on the merits.


text:
    No. 74-1024.
    Sierra Club v. Hills, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Motion of Citizens for Better Environment et al. for leave to join in petition for writ of certiorari denied. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and petition.


text:
    No. 74-1065.
    Illinois v. Grayson.
   Sup. Ct. Ill. Certiorari denied, it appearing the judgment below rests upon adequate state grounds.

Mr. Justice Douglas would grant certiorari.


text:
    No. 74-926.
    No. 74-930.
    No. 74-5964.
    No. 74-6034.
    City of Pittsburgh v. Public Parking Authority of Pittsburgh et al., Illinois et al. v. Federal Power Commission et al., Olenz v. Cleary et al., White v. Michigan State University,
   ante, p. 912;

ante, p. 912;

420 U. S. 994; and

ante, p. 918. Petitions for rehearing denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.


text:
    June 2, 1975

    No. 74-1027.
    Garcia et al. v. Texas State Board of Medical Examiners et al.

       Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in thé consideration or decision of cases in which orders hereinafter reported were announced on this date, with the exception of the following:
      No. 73-1285, Wood v. Strickland, infra, p. 997; No. 74-1027, Garcia v. Texas State Board of Medical Examiners, infra, this page; No. 74-1057, Commodity Option Co. v. Bernhardt, infra, p. 1004; No. 74-1062, Caldwell v. City of New Orleans, infra, p. 1003; No. 74-1072, Henderson v. Donivan, infra, p. 996; No. 74-1076, Washington v. Murray, infra, p. 1004; No. 74-1085, Matteo v. United States, infra, p. 998; No. 74-1097, Consumers Union of United States v. Kissinger, infra, p. 1004; No. 74-1121, Hood v. United States, infra, p. 998; No. 74-1133, Strauss v. United States, infra, p. 998; No. 74-1143, Indiviglio v. United States, infra, p. 998; No. 74-1160, George R. Whitten, Jr., Inc. v. Paddock Pool Builders, Inc., infra, p. 1004; No. 74-1218, Allen Homes, Inc. v. Weersing, infra, p. 998; No. 74—1244, Brundage v. United States, infra, p. 998; No. 74-1270, Train v. Colorado Public Interest Research Group, Inc., infra, p. 998; No. 74-1271, H & R Block, Inc. v. Havenfield Corp., infra, p. 999; No. 74-1272, Local 542, International Union of Operating Engineers v. Higginbotham, infra, p. 999; No. 74-1278, Lovelace v. DeChamplain, infra, p. 996; No. 74-1287, Weinstein v. Bradford, infra, p. 998; No. 74—1308, Lundvall v. Kuiper, infra, p. 996; No. 74-6072, Jackson v. Illinois, infra, p. 999; No. 74-6108, Moore v. United States, infra, p. 999; No. 74-6121, Saunders v. Foltz, infra, p. 999; No. 74-6161, Breen v. United States, infra, p. 998; No. 74-6238, Geelan v. United States, infra, p. 999; and No. 74-6357, Roots v. Wainwright, infra, p. 996.

   Affirmed on appeal from D. C. W. D. Tex.

Mr. Justice Brennan, Mr. Justice White, and Mr. Justice Marshall would note probable jurisdiction and set case for oral argument.


text:
    No. 74-1289.
    Phagan v. Texas.
   Appeal from Ct. Civ. App. Tex., 2d Sup. Jud. Dist., dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1308.
    Lundvall v. Kuiper et al.
   Appeal from Sup. Ct. Colo, dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6357.
    Roots v. Wainwright, Corrections Director.
   Appeal from Sup. Ct. Fla. dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-948.
    United States v. Sanford et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Serfass v. United States, 420 U. S. 377 (1975).


text:
    No. 74-1072.
    Henderson, Warden v. Donivan.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and certiorari granted. Judgment vacated and case remanded for consideration of question of mootness.


text:
    No. 74-1278.
    Lovelace et al. v. DeChamplain.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and certiorari granted. Judgment vacated and case remanded to the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri with directions to dismiss cause as moot.


text:
    No. A-944.
    Canney v. Florida.
   Application for stay of execution and enforcement of judgment of the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, presented to Mr. Justice Brennan, and by him referred to the Court, denied.


text:
    No. A-967.
    Smilow v. United States.
   Application for injunction pending appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, presented to Mr. Justice Marshall, and by him referred to the Court, denied.


text:
    No. A-981.
    Newspapers, Inc., dba Austin American-Statesman v. Blackwell, Judge.

       See also note, supra, p. 995.

   Application for stay of order of 147th Judicial District Court of Travis County, Tex., presented to Mr. Justice Powell, and by

him referred to the Court, denied.

Mr. Justice Brennan and Mr. Justice White would grant the application. The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.


text:
    No. 74-6358.
    Shinder v. Esmiol.
   Motion for leave to file petition for writ of certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-538.
    United States v. Watson.
   C. A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 420 U. S. 924.] Motion for appointment of counsel is granted, and Michael D. Nasatir, Esquire, of Beverly Hills, Cal., is appointed to serve as counsel for respondent in this case.


text:
    No. 73-1285.
    Wood et al. v. Strickland et al.,
   420 U. S. 308. Motion of respondents to retax costs granted and it is ordered that petitioners and respondents divide the costs equally.


text:
    No. 74-6292.
    No. 74-6478.
    Sacasas v. Hogan, Warden; and Mink v. Egeler, Warden.
   Motions for leave to file petitions for writs of habeas corpus denied.


text:
    No. 74-1270.
    Train, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, et al. v. Colorado Public Interest Research Group, Inc., et al.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Motion of Boston Edison Co. et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae and certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 74-1287.
    Weinstein et al. v. Bradford et al.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Motion of respondents for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 74-1085.
    No. 74-1143.
    No. 74-6161.
    Matteo v. United States; Indiviglio v. United States; and Breen v. United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1121.
    Hood, aka Hawkins, et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1133.
    Strauss v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1218.
    Allen Homes, Inc. v. Weersing et al.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1244.
    Brundage v. United States.
   Ct. Cl.

Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1271.
    H & R Block, Inc. v. Hayenfield Corp.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1272.
    Local 542, International Union of Operating Engineers v. Higginbotham, U. S. District Judge.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6072.
    Jackson v. Illinois.
   App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6108.
    No. 74-6238.
    Moore et al. v. United States; and Geelan v. United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6121.
    Saunders et al. v. Foltz, Deputy Warden, et al.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 73-1768.
    Duff v. Fain.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-750.
    Davis, Corrections Director, et al. v. Lewis.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-954.
    Sharp, Judge, et al. v. Cobell et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1020.
    Allstate Mortgage Corp. et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1039.
    Zychinski et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1129.
    James v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1145.
    Cook v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1189.
    American Standard, Inc. v. Crane Co. et al.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1195.
    Waterfront Guard Association, Local 1852, Independent Watchmen’s Association of the Port of Baltimore, Maryland v. National Labor Relations Board et al.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1206.
    Zions First National Bank, Executor v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
   C. A.

10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1215.
    T. J. Falgout Boats, Inc., et al. v. United States et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1232.
    Beltronics, Inc. v. Eberline Instrument Corp. et al.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-5248.
    Anderson v. Maryland.
   Ct. App.

Md. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6128.
    Knight v. Estelle, Corrections Director.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6133.
    Tedder v. Florida.
   Dist. Ct. App. Fla,, 2d Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6147.
    O’Donnell v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.