text:
    No. 74-1384.
    No. 75-17.
    Clay Communications, Inc. v. Sprouse; and Sprouse v. Clay Communications, Inc.
   Sup. Ct. App. W. Va. Motion of American Newspaper Publishers Assn, for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Brennan would grant certiorari.

Mr. Justice Douglas, being of the view, stated in his previous opinions and those of Mr. Justice Black, that any state or federal libel law imposing liability for discussion of public affairs abridges freedom of speech and of the press contrary to the First and Fourteenth Amendments, would grant certiorari in No. 74^1384 and summarily reverse the judgment. Reported below. - W. Va. -, 211 S. E. 2d 674.

        Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U. S. 323, 355-360 (1974) (dissenting); Time, Inc. v. Hill, 385 U. S. 374, 401-402 (1967) (concurring); Rosenblatt v. Baer, 383 U. S. 75, 88-91 (1966) (concurring).

        Time, Inc. v. Hill, supra, at 398-401 (concurring); Rosenblatt v. Baer, supra, at 94-95 (concurring and dissenting); New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U. S. 254, 293-297 (1964) (concurring).


source: Caselaw Access Project

license: Public Domain

text:
    No. 74-1647.
    E. W. Scripps Co. et al. v. Thomas H. Maloney & Sons, Inc.

   Ct. App. Ohio, Cuyahoga

County. Certiorari denied. Mr. Justice Douglas, being of the view, stated in his previous opinions and those of Mr. Justice Black, that any state or federal libel law imposing liability for discussion of public affairs abridges freedom of speech and of the press contrary to the First and Fourteenth Amendments, would grant cer-tiorari and summarily reverse the judgment.

        Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U. S. 323, 355-360 (1974) (dissenting); Time, Inc. v. Hill, 385 U. S. 374, 401-402 (1967) (concurring); Rosenblatt v. Baer, 383 U. S. 75, 88-91 (1966) (concurring).

        Time, Inc. v. Hill, supra, at 398-401 (concurring); Rosenblatt v. Baer, supra, at 94-95 (concurring and dissenting); New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U. S. 254, 293-297 (1964) (concurring).


text:
    No. 75-224.
    Village Voice, Inc., et al v. Rinaldi.
   App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 1st Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied for want of a final judgment. Mr. Justice Douglas is of the view, stated in his previous opinions1 and those of Mr. Justice Black,2 that any state or federal libel law imposing liability for discussion of public affairs abridges freedom of speech and of the press contrary to the First and Fourteenth Amendments. He is also of the view, stated in his opinion in Mills v. Alabama, 384 U. S. 214, 221-222 (1966), that the judgment below is final because further proceedings are precluded in the state court and the present posture of that judgment upon remand will deter others from exercising their constitutional right to discuss public affairs. Mr. Justice Douglas would therefore grant certiorari and summarily reverse the judgment.

       Cf. Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn, 420 U. S. 469, 484-487 (1975); Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Tornillo, 418 U. S. 241, 246-247 and n. 6 (1974).


text:
    No. 73-1256. No. 74-124. No. 74-157. No. 74-647. No. 74-1019. No. 74-1144. No. 74-1170. No. 74-1276. No. 74-1293. No. 74-1310. No. 74-1326. No. 74-6162. No. 74-6231.
    Connell Construction Co., Inc. v. Plumbers & Steamfitters Local Union No. 100, United Association of Journeymen & Apprentices of the Plumbing & Pipefitting Industry of the United States and Canada, AFL-CIO, Blue Chip Stamps et al. v. Manor Drug Stores, United Housing Foundation, Inc., et al. v. Forman et al., New York et al. v. Forman et al., Gargotto v. United States, Lawrence et al. v. South Carolina, Austin et al. v. United States et al., Cotten v. Schlesinger, Secretary of Defense, City of Black Jack, Missouri v. United States, Edwards Underground Water District et al. v. Hills, Secretary of Housing And Urban Development, et al., Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Co. v. United States et al., White v. Dalton, U. S. District Judge, Klein v. Immigration and Naturalization Service,
   421 U. S. 616;

421 U. S. 723;

421 U. S. 837;

421 U. S. 837;

421 U. S. 987;

422 U. S. 1025;

422 U. S. 1042;

422 U, S. 1027;

422 U. S. 1042;

422 U. S. 1049;

422 U. S. 1042;

422 U. S. 1043; and

422 U. S. 1048. Petitions for rehearing denied.


text:
    No. 74-6379. No. 74-6432.
    Porzuczek, Guardian v. Towner et al., Greene et al. v. Chandler, Mayor of Memphis, et al.,
   421 U. S. 1014; and

421 U. S. 1014. Petitions for rehearing denied.


text:
    No. 74-1624.
    Lewis v. Strachan Shipping Co. et al.,
   409 TJ. S. 887, 1002. Motion for leave to file second petition for rehearing denied.


text:
    No. 73-1888. No. 74-487. No. 74-584. No. 74-703. No. 74-1130. No. 74-1259. No. 74-1339. No. 74-1347. No. 74-6292. No. 74-6358. No. 74-6451. No. 74-6462. No. 74-6487.
    United States v. Alaska, Clover Bottom Hospital & School v. Townsend et al., Sears v. Dann, Commissioner of Patents, Phillips et al. v. United States, Friedman et al. v. United States, Mandel et al. v. Nouse et al., Gumanis v. Donaldson, Thompson et ux. v. Property Tax Appeal Board of Illinois et al., Sacasas v. Hogan, Warden, Shinder v. Esmiol, Mikell v. Gilchrist County, Florida, et al., White v. Reynolds et al., Hughes v. Ault, Corrections Director,
   422 U. S. 184;

421 U. S. 1007;

422 U. S. 1056;

422 U. S.1056;

421 U. S. 1004;

422 U. S.1008;

422 U. S. 1052;

422 U. S. 1002;

421 U. S. 998;

421 U. S. 997;

422 U. S. 1011;

422 U. S. 1046; and

422 U. S. 1047. Petitions for rehearing denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.


text:
    No. 74-70.
    Goldfarb et ux. v. Virginia State Bar et al.,
   421 U. S. 773. Petition for rehearing denied.

Mr. Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 74-594. No. 74-789.
    Weisbrod v. Lynn, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, et al., Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturers Assn. et al. v. Brennan, Secretary of Labor, et al.,
   420 U. S. 940; and

420 U. S. 973. Motions for leave to file petitions for rehearing denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.


text:
    No. 74-1229.
    American Telephone & Telegraph Co. et al. v. Federal Communications Commission et al.,
   422 U. S. 1026. Petition for rehearing denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Blackmun took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.


text:
    No. 74-6305.
    Bennett v. North Carolina,
   421 U. S. 993. Motion for leave to file petition for rehearing denied.


text:
    October 10, 1975
    No. 75-30.
    Monk et al. v. Chambers & Kennedy et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari dismissed under this Court’s Rule 60.


text:
    October 14, 1975
    No. 75-262.
    Dodge et al. v. Austin, Secretary of State of Michigan, et al.
   Affirmed on appeal from D. C. E. D. Mich.


text:
    No. 74-1427.
    Reuben L. Anderson-Cherne, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue of Minnesota.
   Appeal from Sup. Ct. Minn, dismissed for want of substantial federal question.


text:
    No. 75-178.
    Ganschow v. Ganschow.
   Appeal from Sup. Ct. Cal. dismissed for want of substantial federal question.


text:
    No. 75-5266.
    Pauley v. Massachusetts.
   Appeal from Sup. Jud. Ct. Mass, dismissed for want of substantial federal question.


text:
    No. 75-186.
    Godsy v. Godsy.
   Appeal from Ct. App. Mo., Kansas City District, dismissed for want of jurisdiction., Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5349.
    Corrado et ux. v. City of Providence et al.
   Appeal from Sup. Ct. R. I. dismissed for want of jurisdiction.


text:
    No. A-264 (75-471).
    Collis v. Kentucky Bar Assn.
   Ct. App. Ky. Motion to vacate stay heretofore granted by Mr. Justice Stewart on September 25, 1975, denied.


text:
    No. A-296 (75-109).
    Finkbeiner, Warden v. Mattox.
   Application for stay of mandate of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, presented to Mr. Justice Rehnquist, and by him referred to the Court, denied.


text:
    No. 74-851.
    Seeber et al. v. Alabama et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Motion of respondents to consolidate this case with No. 74-220, Hancock v. Train [certiorari granted, 420 U. S. 971], denied.


text:
    No.-.
    Calley v. Callaway, Secretary of the Army, et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Motion to dispense with printing portions of appendix to petition for writ of certiorari granted. Typewritten or otherwise reproduced copies of nonprinted opinions will be acceptable only if legible.


text:
    No. D-57.
    In re Disbarment of Parsons.
   It is ordered that Russell Edward Parsons, of Santa Ana, Cal., be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.


text:
    No. D-58.
    In re Disbarment of Tarbox.
   It is ordered that Robert Earl Tarbox, of San Francisco', Cal., be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.


text:
    No. D-59.
    In re Disbarment of Nelson.
   It is ordered that Raymond Alexander Nelson, of San Anselmo, Cal., be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.


text:
    No. 74-175. No. 74-5176.
    Middendorf, Secretary of the Navy, et al. v. Henry et al.; and Henry et al. v. Middendorf, Secretary of the Navy, et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. [Restored to calendar, 421 U. S. 906.] Motion for leave to file memorandum suggesting that this Court's holdings after oral argument in these cases at bar raise new question of law granted.


text:
    No. 74-1222.
    Wolff, Warden v. Rice.
   C. A. 8th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 422 U. S. 1055.] Motion of respondent for appointment of counsel granted, and J. Patrick Green, Esquire, of Omaha, Neb., is appointed to serve as counsel for respondent in this case.


text:
    No. 74-1270.
    Train, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, et al. v. Colorado Public Interest Research Group, Inc., et al.
   C. A. 10th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 421 U. S. 998.] Motion of Michael S. Baram et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted.


text:
    No. 74-1274.
    Abbott Laboratories et al. v. Portland Retail Druggists Assn., Inc.
   C. A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 422 U. S. 1040.] Motion of Alabama Pharmaceutical Assn, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted.


text:
    No. 74-1396.
    Michelin Tire Corp. v. Wages, Tax Commissioner, et al.
   Sup. Ct. Ga. [Certiorari granted, 422 U. S. 1040.] Motion of Los Angeles County et al. for leave to participate in oral argument as amici curiae denied.


text:
    No. 75-436.
    No. 75-437.
    Buckley et al. v. Valeo, Secretary of the United States Senate, et al. Buckley et al. v. Valeo, Secretary of the United States Senate, et al.
   Appeal from C. A. D. C. Cir; and

Appeal from D. C. D. C. [Probable jurisdiction noted, ante, p. 820.] Motion of Brice M. Claggett, Esquire, to permit Ralph K. Winter, Jr., Esquire, to present oral argument pro hac vice granted. Motion of Senator Lee Metcalf for leave to permit oral argument on his behalf as amicus curiae denied without prejudice to his seeking part of the four hours allotted litigants in these cases.


text:
    No. 75-522.
    No. 75-5280.
    Tallant et al. v. Henson, U. S. Marshal, et al.; and Dunn v. California.
   Motions for leave to file petitions for writs of habeas corpus denied.


text:
    No. 74-1303.
    Bishop v. Wood et al.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 74-1563.
    City of Eastlake et al. v. Forest City Enterprises, Inc.
   Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 75-19.
    United States v. Santana et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 75-185.
    Lodge 76, International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workers, AFI-CIO, et al. v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission et al.
   Sup. Ct. Wis. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 75-250.
    City of Charlotte et al. v. Local 660, International Association of Firefighters et al.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 74-1608.
    No. 74-1619.
    National Association for the Advancement of Colored People et al. v. Federal Power Commission; and Federal Power Commission v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People et al.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari granted. Cases consolidated and a total of one hour allotted for oral argument.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.

Reported below: 172 U. S. App. D. C. 32, 520 F. 2d 432.


text:
    No. 75-110.
    Sakraida v. Ag Pro, Inc.
   G. A. 5th. Cir. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 75-145.
    Northern Cheyenne Tribe v. Hollowbreast et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Motions of respondents for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 75-130.
    Quinn, Commissioner, Chicago Fire Department v. Muscare.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus denied. Alternative petition for writ of certiorari granted. Case is recaptioned in this Court to reflect true respondent in this case.


text:
    No. 74-1392.
    Washington v. Lesnick.
   Sup. Ct.

Wash. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1439.
    No. 74-1468.
    Nusbaum, Judge v. Ghezzi, Acting Secretary of State of New York, et al.; and Rubino et al. v. Ghezzi, Acting Secretary of State of New York, et al.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 512 F. 2d 431.


text:
    No. 74-1554.
    Ming v. United States.
   Ct. Cl. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6452.
    Acosta v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6463.
    Brantley v. Sullivan, Corrections Commissioner, et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6546.
    Holsey v. Criminal Court of Baltimore et al.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6561.
    Holodnak v. Avco Corp., Avco-Lycoming Division.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6699.
    Canney v. Florida.
   Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 2d Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6709.
    Birch v. Koota et al.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6743.
    Johnson v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6744.
    Barbee et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6747.
    Johnson v. Keve, Corrections Commissioner, et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6754.
    Farris v. United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-37.
    Ryan et ux. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-55.
    Pelaez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-63.
    Ross v. Reda, Judge.
   C. A. 6th Cir, Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-74.
    Conque v. Gauthe et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-94.
    Brewer v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-92.
    Tunnell et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-108.
    Troy’s Welding, Inc., et al. v. United States et al.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-114.
    Shahane v. United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-120.
    Finis P. Ernest, Inc. v. United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-127.
    Associated Shower Door Co., Inc., et al. v. National Labor Relations Board.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-133.
    Clark v. Johnson et al.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-147.
    Tucker v. Neal et al.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-171.
    Jensen v. Kilgarif et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-174.
    Ernest v. Miller, Attorney General of Virginia.
   Cir. Ct. City of Richmond, Va., Div. 1. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-176.
    Houston Endowment, Inc. v. Dunlop, Secretary of Labor.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-195.
    Triangle Publications, Inc. v. Montandon.
   Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-177.
    Garcia et al. v. District of Columbia.
   Ct. App. D. C. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-179.
    Brake v. MFA Mutual Insurance Co.
   Ct. App. Mo., St. Louis Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-196.
    Hammock v. North Carolina.
   Ct. App. N. C. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-198.
    Walker v. North Carolina.
   Ct. App. N. C. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-199.
    Ressler v. States Marine Lines, Inc.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-206.
    Better Monkey Grip Co. et al. v. National Car Rental System, Inc.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-231.
    National Alfalfa Dehydrating & Milling Co. v. American Pollution Prevention Co., Inc.
   Sup. Ct. Minn. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-232.
    Pacific Fidelity Life Insurance Co. et al. v. DeVoto et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-233.
    DeChiaro et al. v. New York.
   App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 3d Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-249.
    Local Union 77, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. City Electric, Inc., et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-241.
    Moity v. Louisiana State Bar Assn.
   Sup. Ct. La. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-256.
    Baxter v. Georgia.
   Ct. App. Ga. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-267.
    Stephens v. Kentucky.
   Ct. App. Ky. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5001.
    Victorian v. Rodriguez.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5002.
    Campbell v. United States.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5008.
    McCoy v. United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5011.
    Ricon v. Garrison, Warden, et al.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5019.
    Polus v. United States.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5034.
    Lopez v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5035.
    Napier v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5036.
    Wooten v. United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5039.
    Canada v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5040.
    Long v. United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5038.
    McCoy v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5051.
    Phillips v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5053.
    Young v. United States.
   C. A. 9th ■ Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5057.
    Leshay v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5059.
    Boyd et al. v. Lefrak Organization et al.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5071.
    Dean v. United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5073.
    Spence v. Latting et al.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5078.
    Van Meter v. Morgan, Sheriff, et al.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5084.
    Scranton v. Whealon.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5085.
    Nunn v. United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5088.
    Tragas v. United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5089.
    Turpin v. United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5093.
    Neugebauer v. United States.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5094.
    Ellerbee v. United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5099.
    Hendrix v. United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5100.
    Haynes v. United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5101.
    Buchanan v. Wheeler.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5103.
    Latta v. Fitzharris et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5106.
    Hoover v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5111.
    Wilkerson v. Virginia.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5112.
    Pleasant v. Ohio.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5114.
    Alers v. Toledo et al.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5128.
    Taylor v. Henderson, Warden.
   Sup. Ct. La. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5150.
    Presley v. Gathright, Correctional Superintendent.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5149.
    Hassan v. Woodhaven Apartments, Inc.
   App. Term, Sup. Ct. N. Y., 1st Jud. Dept. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5190.
    Lyle v. National Surety Corp. et al.
   Ct. App. La., 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5241.
    Webster v. Pennsylvania.
   Sup. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5152.
    Marshall v. District of Columbia Government et al.
   Ct. App. D. C. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5244.
    Slaughter v. Brigham Young University.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5258.
    Nassar v. Vinzant, Correctional Superintendent.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5259.
    Jackson v. Alabama.
   Ct. Crim. App. Ala. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5299.
    Bowman v. Egeler, Warden.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


author: Mr. Justice Brennan,

text:
    No. 74-1282.
    Ratner v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas, being of the view, stated in his previous opinions and those of Mr. Justice Black, that any state or federal ban on, or regulation of, obscenity abridges freedom of speech and of the press contrary to the First and Fourteenth Amendments, would grant certiorari and summarily reverse the judgment.

Mr. Justice Brennan,

with whom Mr. Justice Stewart and Mr. Justice Marshall join,

dissenting.

Petitioner was convicted in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas of mailing obscene magazines and films, and mailing advertisements describing how to obtain such magazines and films, in violation of 18 U. S. C. § 1461, which provides in pertinent part:

“Every obscene, lewd, lascivious, indecent, filthy or vile article, matter, thing, device, or substance; . . .
“Is declared to be nonmailable matter and shall not be conveyed in the mails or delivered from any post office or by any letter carrier.
“Whoever knowingly uses the mails for the mailing ... of anything declared by this section ... to be nonmailable, . . . shall be fined not more than $5,000 or imprisoned not more than five years . . . .”

The Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed, 502 F. 2d 1300 (1974).

1 adhere to my dissent in United States v. Orito, 413 U. S. 139, 147 (1973), in which, speaking of 18 U. S. C. § 1462, which is similar in scope to § 1461, I expressed the view that “[wjhatever the extent of the Federal Government’s power to bar the distribution of allegedly obscene material to juveniles or the offensive exposure of such material to unconsenting adults, the statute before us is clearly overbroad and unconstitutional on its face.” 413 U. S., at 147-148. For the reasons stated in my dissent in Miller v. California, 413 U. S. 15, 47 (1973), I would therefore grant certiorari, and, since the judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit was rendered after Orito, reverse. In that circumstance, I have no occasion to consider whether the other questions presented merit plenary review. See Heller v. New York, 413 U. S. 483, 494 (1973) (Brennan, J., dissenting).

Finally, it appears from the petition and response that the obscenity of the disputed materials was not adjudged by applying local community standards. Based on my dissent in Hamling v. United States, 418 U. S. 87, 141 (1974), I believe that, consistent with the Due Process Clause, petitioner must be given an opportunity to have his case decided on, and to introduce evidence relevant to, the legal standard upon which his conviction has ultimately come to depend. Thus, even on its own terms, the Court should vacate the judgment below and remand for a determination whether petitioner should be afforded a new trial under local community standards.

        Miller v. California, 413 U. S. 15, 42-47 (1973) (dissenting); Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49, 70-73 (1973) (dissenting); Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U. S. 413, 426-433 (1966) (concurring in judgment); Ginzburg v. United States, 383 U. S. 463, 491-492 (1966) (dissenting); Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476, 508-514 (1957) (dissenting).

        Ginzburg v. United States, supra, at 476 (dissenting); Mishkin v. New York, 383 U. S. 502, 515-518 (1966) (dissenting).

       Although four of us would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment, the Justices who join this opinion do not insist that the case be decided on the merits.


text:
    No. 74-1430.
    Sandquist v. California.
   App. Dept., Super. Ct. Cal., County of Los Angeles. Certiorari denied. Mr. Justice Douglas, being of the view, stated in his previous opinions and those of Mr. Justice Black, that any state or federal ban on, or regulation of, obscenity abridges freedom of speech and of the press contrary to the First and Fourteenth Amendments, would grant certiorari and summarily reverse the judgment.

Mr. Justice Brennan,

with whom Mr. Justice Stewart and Mr. Justice Marshall join,

dissenting.

Petitioner was convicted in the Municipal Court of Los Angeles of exhibiting allegedly obscene motion pictures in violation of Cal. Penal Code § 311.2 (1970), which provides in pertinent part as follows:

“(a) Every person who knowingly . . . exhibits to others, any obscene matter is guilty of a misdemeanor.”

As used in § 311.2,

“ ‘Obscene matter’ means matter, taken as a whole, the predominant appeal of which to the average person, applying contemporary standards, is to prurient interest, i. e., a shameful or morbid interest in nudity, sex, or excretion; and is matter which taken as a whole goes substantially beyond customary limits of candor in description or representation of such matters; and is matter which taken as a whole is utterly without redeeming social importance.” § 311 (a) (Supp. 1975).

On appeal, the Appellate Department of the Superior Court of California for the County of Los Angeles affirmed the conviction. Certification to the Court of Appeal was sought and denied.

It is my view that “at least in the absence of distribution to juveniles or obtrusive exposure to unconsenting adults, the First and Fourteenth Amendments prohibit the State and Federal Governments from attempting wholly to suppress sexually oriented materials on the basis of their allegedly ‘obscene’ contents.” Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49, 113 (1973) (Brennan, J., dissenting). It is clear that, tested by that constitutional standard, § 311.2, as it incorporates the definition of “obscene matter” in § 311 (a), is constitutionally over-broad and therefore invalid on its face. For the reasons stated in my dissent in Miller v. California, 413 U. S. 15, 47 (1973), I would therefore grant certiorari and, since the judgment of the Appellate Department was rendered after Miller, reverse. In that circumstance, I have no occasion to consider whether the other questions presented merit plenary review. See Heller v. New York, 413 U. S. 483, 495 (1973) (Brennan, J., dissenting).

Further, it appears from the petition and response that the obscenity of the disputed materials was not adjudged by applying local community standards. Based on my dissent in Hamling v. United States, 418 U. S. 87, 141 (1974), I believe that, consistent with the Due Process Clause, petitioner must be given an opportunity to have his case decided on, and to introduce evidence relevant to, the legal standard upon which his conviction has ultimately come to depend. Thus, even on its own terms, the Court should vacate the judgment below and remand for a determination whether petitioner should be afforded a new trial under local community standards.

         Miller v. California, 413 U. S. 15, 42-47 (1973) (dissenting); Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49, 70-73 (1973) (dissenting); Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U. S. 413, 426-433 (.1966) (concurring in judgment); Ginzburg v. United States, 383 U. S. 463, 491-492 (1966) (dissenting); Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476, 508-514 (1957) (dissenting).

        Ginzburg v. United States, supra, at 476 (dissenting); Mishkin v. New York, 383 U. S. 502, 515-518 (1966) (dissenting).

      Although four of us would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment, the Justices who join this opinion do not insist that the case be decided on the merits.


text:
    No. 74-6176.
    Stewart v. Iowa.
   Sup. Ct. Iowa.

Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Brennan,

with whom Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Marshall concur,

dissenting.

On September 27, 1971, petitioner was charged in an information filed in the Justice of the Peace Court in Vinton, Iowa, with reckless driving of an automobile involved in an accident on September 10, 1971, which resulted in the deaths of two people. On October 12, 1971, the Grand Jury of Benton County, Iowa, indicted petitioner for manslaughter arising from the same set of circumstances as formed the basis of the reckless-driving charge. On December 3, 1971, petitioner was found guilty of reckless driving in Justice of the Peace Court and was sentenced to serve 30 days in the county jail and to pay the costs of the action. Subsequently, petitioner filed a motion to dismiss the manslaughter indictment on the ground that prosecution for manslaughter constituted double jeopardy because of his prior conviction for reckless driving based on the same transaction. The motion to dismiss was overruled, and thereafter petitioner was tried and convicted of manslaughter. Petitioner appealed the manslaughter conviction to the Iowa Supreme Court. That court, divided 5 to 4 on the double jeopardy issue, affirmed the conviction. 223 N. W. 2d 250 (1974).

The two charges leveled against petitioner clearly arose out of the same criminal transaction or episode, yet they were tried separately. In that circumstance, we should grant the petition for certiorari and reverse the manslaughter conviction. I adhere to the view that the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment, which is applicable to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment, Benton v. Maryland, 395 U. S. 784 (1969), requires the joinder at one trial, except in extremely limited circumstances not present here, of “all the charges against a defendant that grow out of a single criminal act, occurrence, episode, or transaction.” Ashe v. Swenson, 397 U. S. 436, 453-454 (1970) (Brennan, J., concurring). See Waugh v. Gray, 422 U. S. 1027 (1975) (Brennan, J., dissenting); Wells v. Missouri, 419 U. S. 1075 (1974) (Brennan, J., dissenting); Moton v. Swenson, 417 U. S. 957 (1974) (Brennan, J., dissenting); Tijerinas v. New Mexico, 417 U. S. 956 (1974) (Brennan, J., dissenting); Ciuzio v. United States, 416 U. S. 995 (1974) (Brennan, J., dissenting); Harris v. Washington, 404 U. S. 55, 57 (1971) (concurring statement); Waller v. Florida, 397 U. S. 387, 395 (1970) (Brennan, J., concurring). See also People v. White, 390 Mich. 245, 212 N. W. 2d 222 (1973); State v. Brown, 262 Ore. 442, 497 P. 2d 1191 (1972); Commonwealth v. Campana, 452 Pa. 233, 304 A. 2d 432, vacated and remanded, 414 U. S. 808 (1973), adhered to on remand, 455 Pa. 622, 314 A. 2d 854 (1974); State v. Gregory, 66 N. J. 510, 333 A. 2d 257 (1975).


text:
    No. 74-1568.
    Wind River Indian Education Assn., Inc., et al. v. Ward et al.
   Sup. Ct. Wyo. Motion of respondents Ward et al. for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6553.
    Vardas v. Texas.
   Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Brennan,

with whom Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Marshall concur,

dissenting.

Petitioner was charged in a two-count indictment; the first count charged robbery by assault, the second count charged robbery by firearms, and the indictment contained an enhancement allegation as to the first count by virtue of a prior conviction. As noted by the court below, both counts related to the same transaction. At petitioner’s first trial, on September 5, 1967, the court limited the State to trial on the second count. The trial resulted in a conviction which was subsequently reversed on appeal. 488 S. W. 2d 467 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972). Instead of proceeding to a retrial on the second count of the indictment, however, the State, over petitioner’s former jeopardy objection, proceeded to try him on the first count as compounded by the enhancement allegation which had been abandoned at the 1967 trial. This trial resulted in a conviction which was subsequently affirmed on appeal. 518 S. W. 2d 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1975).

In my view the rejection of petitioner’s former jeopardy claim was error. Cf. Ciuzio v. United States, 416 U. S. 995 (1974) (Brennan, J., dissenting). I adhere to the view that the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment, which is applicable to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment, Benton v. Maryland, 395 U. S. 784 (1969), requires the joinder at one trial, except in extremely limited circumstances not present here, of “all the charges against a defendant that grow out of a single criminal act, occurrence, episode, or transaction.” Ashe v. Swenson, 397 U. S. 436, 453-454 (1970) (Brennan, J., concurring). See Stewart v. Iowa, ante, p. 902 (Brennan, J., dissenting); Waugh v. Gray, 422 U. S. 1027 (1975) (Brennan, J., dissenting); Wells v. Missouri, 419 U. S. 1075 (1974) (Brennan, J., dissenting); Moton v. Swenson, 417 U. S. 957 (1974) (Brennan, J., dissenting); Tijerina v. New Mexico, 417 U. S. 956 (1974) (Brennan, J., dissenting); Ciuzio v. United States, supra (Brennan, J., dissenting); Harris v. Washington, 404 U. S. 55, 57 (1971) (concurring statement); Waller v. Florida, 397 U. S. 387, 395 (1970) (Brennan, J., concurring). See also People v. White, 390 Mich. 245, 212 N. W. 2d 222 (1973); State v. Brown, 262 Ore. 442, 497 P. 2d 1191 (1972); Commonwealth v. Campana, 452 Pa. 233, 304 A. 2d 432, vacated and remanded, 414 U. S. 808 (1973), adhered to on remand, 455 Pa. 622, 314 A. 2d 854 (1974); State v. Gregory, 66 N. J. 510, 333 A. 2d 257 (1975). I would therefore grant the petition for certiorari and reverse the conviction. In that circumstance, I have no occasion to consider whether the other questions presented merit plenary review. See Heller v. New York, 413 U. S. 483, 495 (1973) (Brennan, J., dissenting).


text:
    No. 75-209. No. 75-225.
    Williams v. Brasea, Inc., et al.; and Brasea, Inc., et al. v. Bender Welding & Machine Co., Inc., et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.

Reported below: 497 F. 2d 67 and 513 F. 2d 301.

Mr. Justice Douglas would grant cer-tiorari.


text:
    No. 75-227.
    Federal Power Commission v. Consumer Federation of America et al.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Stewart and Mr. Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 75-248.
    Korholz v. Dasho, Executor, et al.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 75-254.
    Dillard, Judge v. Walker.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.


text:
    OCTOBER 20, 1975
    No. 75-279.
    Baker et al. v. Owen et al.
   Affirmed on appeal from D. C. M. D. N. C.


text:
    No. 74-6715.
    Kline et al. v. Illinois.
   Appeal from Sup. Ct. Ill. dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied. Mr. Justice Brennan would note probable jurisdiction and set case for oral argument.


text:
    No. 75-207.
    Appalachian Power Co. v. Public Service Commission of West Virginia.
   Appeal from Sup. Ct. App. W. Va. dismissed for want of substantial federal question.

Mr. Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of this appeal.


text:
    No. 75-263.
    Board of Education of Armstrong High School District No. 225, Vermilion and Champaign Counties, et al. v. Ellis, Superintendent of Educational Service Region, Vermilion County, et al.
   Appeal from Sup. Ct. Ill. dismissed for want of substantial federal question.


text:
    No. 75-295.
    Albert Simon, Inc., et al. v. Myerson, Commissioner, Department of Consumer Affairs of the City of New York.
   Appeal from Ct. App. N. Y. dismissed for want of substantial federal question.


text:
    No. 75-305.
    No. 75-315.
    Griggs, Cooper & Co., Inc. v. Novak, Liquor Control Commissioner of Minnesota, et al.; and Heaven Hill Distilleries, Inc. v. Novak, Liquor Control Commissioner of Minnesota, et al.
   Appeals from Sup. Ct. Minn, dismissed for want of substantial federal question. Reported below: 304 Minn. 28, 229 N. W. 2d 144.


text:
    No. 75-284.
    Metropolitan Dade County, Florida, et al. v. Aerojet-General Corp.
   Appeal from C. A. 5th Cir. dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5081.
    Howlett v. Federal National Mortgage Assn.
   Appeal from Sup. Ct. Mo. dismissed for want of substantial federal question.


text:
    No. 74-5314.
    Smith v. Kentucky.
   Appeal from Ct. App. Ky. dismissed for want of substantial federal question.


text:
    No. 9,
    Orig.
    United States v. Louisiana et al.
   (Louisiana Boundary Case). The First Accounting of Louisiana filed pursuant to the Decree of June 16, 1975 [422 U. S. 13]; the Accounting by the United States filed pursuant to paragraph 6 (b) of the Decree of June 16, 1975; the Accounting by Louisiana filed pursuant to paragraph 5 of the Decree of June 16, 1975; and the Accounting by the United States filed pursuant to paragraphs 5 (b) and 7 of the Decree of June 16, 1975, referred to the Special Master.


text:
    No. 36,
    Orig.
    Texas v. Louisiana.
    [For earlier orders herein, see, e. g., 421 U. S. 905.]
   Exceptions to the Report of the Special Master set for oral argument in due course.


text:
    No. A-151.
    Raymond v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Application for stay of execution of judgment and/or bail pending appeal, presented to Mr. Justice Stewart, and by him referred to the Court, denied.


text:
    No. 74-882.
    DeCanas et al. v. Bica et al.
   Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. [Certiorari granted, 422 U. S. 1040.] Motion of petitioners for divided argument denied.


text:
    No. 75-82.
    Sheet Metal Workers’ International Assn. v. Carter.
   Ct. App. Ga. The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.


text:
    No. 74-1107. No. 74-1304.
    Cappaert et al. v. United States et al.; and Nevada ex rel. Westergard v. United States et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 422 U. S. 1041.] Motion of petitioners for additional time for oral argument granted and 15 additional minutes allotted for that purpose. Respondents also allotted 15 additional minutes for oral argument.


text:
    No. 74-1245.
    Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Wetzel et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. [Certiorari granted, 421 U. S. 987.] Motion of the Attorney General of Ohio for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae denied.


text:
    No. 75-320.
    Braniff Airways, Inc. v. El Paso Coin Co., Inc., et al.
   Ct. Civ. App. Tex., 8th Sup. Jud. Dist. The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.


text:
    No. 75-5366.
    Fisher v. District Court of the Sixteenth Judicial District of Montana, in and for the County of Rosebud.
   Sup. Ct. Mont. The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.


text:
    No. 75-250.
    City of Charlotte et al. v. Local 660, International Association of Firefighters et al.
   C. A. 4th Cir. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 890.] Motion of respondent Middleton et al. for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied.


text:
    No. 75-208.
    Ratcliff v. Texas et al.
   Motion for leave to file petition for writ of certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5194.
    Lewis v. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit et al.
   Motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus denied.


text:
    No. 75-300.
    Novick et al. v. United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana et al.
   Motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition denied.


text:
    No. 75-268
    Radzanower v. Touche Ross & Co. et al.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 75-292.
    Serbian Eastern Orthodox Diocese for the United States of America and Canada et al. v. Milivojevich et al.
   Sup. Ct. Ill. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 75-312.
    Gribbs, Mayor of Detroit, et al. v. American Mini Theatres, Inc., et al.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 75-328.
    United States v. Orleans et al.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 75-339.
    Buffalo Forge Co. v. United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO, et al.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 74-1516.
    Presley v. Mississippi.
   Sup. Ct. Miss. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1605.
    Rosenfeld v. Rumble et al.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-52.
    Austin v. United States.
   Ct. Cl. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6718.
    Stanley v. Wainwright, Secretary, Department of Offender Rehabilitation of Florida.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-59.
    Brady v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-101.
    Vigi et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-113.
    Ramirez v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-123.
    Nichols et ux. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-132.
    Jeffords v. United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-180.
    Interstate 95 Committee v. Coleman, Secretary of Transportation, et al.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-181.
    Haverly et ux. v. United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-229.
    De Filippo et al., t/a A & S v. Ford Motor Co.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-253.
    Harte v. Lehnhausen, Former Director, Department of Local Government Affairs of Illinois, et al.
   Sup. Ct. Ill. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-269.
    National Labor Relations Board v. Decaturville Sportswear Co., Inc., et al.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-271.
    Packaging Industries, Inc. v. Diematic Manufacturing Corp.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certio-rari denied.


text:
    No. 75-275.
    Adkins et al. v. Adickes et al.
   Sup. Ct. S. C. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-289.
    Schulz v. Cress et al.
   Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-291.
    Klein v. Robinson et al.
   Sup. Ct. N. J. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-293.
    Irrigation & Power Equipment, Inc., et al. v. Sims Consolidated, Ltd.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-296.
    Berberian v. Rhode Island Bar Assn.
   Sup. Ct. R. I. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-297.
    Stebbins v. Crocker-Citizens National Bank.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-298.
    Nix v. Tennessee.
   Ct. Crim. App. Tenn. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-329.
    Kaufman v. Dumpson, Administrator, Human Resources Administration of the City of New York.
   Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-304.
    Continental Casualty Co. v. Winston Corp.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-310.
    Sperry Rand Corp. v. Deere & Co.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-316.
    Bistany v. California.
   App. Dept., Super. Ct. Cal., County of Los Angeles. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-319.
    Cukrowski et al. v. Mt. Sinai Hospital, Inc., et al.
   Sup. Ct. Wis. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-331.
    Ruffin et al. v. Mercury Record Productions, Inc., et al.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5020.
    Carter v. Larkin.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5037.
    No. 75-5050.
    Sims v. United States; and Malone v. United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5062.
    No. 75-5080.
    No. 75-5096.
    Harris v. United States; Harris v. United States; and Patrick v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 514 F. 2d 710.


text:
    No. 75-5064.
    No. 75-5065.
    No. 75-5066.
    Shad v. United States; Byrd v. United States; and Goble v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 512 F. 2d 458.


text:
    No. 75-5067.
    Hernandez et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5068.
    Baldwin, aka Christofilis v. United States.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5069.
    Masterson v. United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5070.
    Cocheres v. United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5083.
    Van Blaricom v. Forscht.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5092.
    Donovan v. United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5104.
    McMullen v. United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5113.
    Rodriguez v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5117.
    Gartner v. United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5119.
    Williams v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5120.
    Knight v. United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5121.
    Rolls v. United States.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5126.
    Brown v. Perini, Correctional Superintendent.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5124.
    Ward v. Carpenter, Sheriff.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5134.
    Pritchard v. Julian et al.
   Sup. Ct. App. W. Ya. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5135.
    Foster v. United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5137.
    Evans v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5138.
    Rumfelt v. United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5139.
    Ramirez v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5141.
    Bey, aka Williams v. United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5142.
    Rush v. United States.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5143.
    Hunter v. United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5145.
    Lee v. United States
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5151.
    Hanks v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5156.
    McDonnell v. Wolff, Warden.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5153.
    Brown v. United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5155.
    Popeko v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5174.
    Woollen v. Williams et al.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5180.
    Raphiel et al. v. Henderson, Warden.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5276.
    Venable v. Alabama.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5333.
    Matthews v. Miller et al.
   C. A., 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5361.
    Roddy v. Black, Reformatory Superintendent.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5468.
    Casey, Administrator v. Kentucky.
   Ct. App. Ky. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-226.
    United States v. Spinella.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Blackmun would grant certiorari.


text:
    No. 75-5400.
    La Ruffa, aka Brooks v. New York.
   Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Marshall would grant certiorari.


text:
    October 29, 1975
    No. 75-5453.
    Brown v. Florida.
   Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 2d Dist. Certiorari dismissed under this Court's Rule 60.


text:
    October 31, 1975
    No. 75-5075.
    Vick v. North Carolina.
   Sup. Ct. N. C. Certiorari dismissed under this Court’s Rule 60.


text:
    November 3, 1975

    No. 74-6444.
    Pitts et al. v. Florida.

      Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of cases in which orders hereinafter reported were announced on this date.

   Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 1st Dist. Certiorari dismissed under this Court’s Rule 60.


text:
    No. 75-134.
    Cannon v. Guste et al.
   Affirmed on appeal from D. C. E. D. La.


text:
    No. 75-257.
    Baker v. United States.
   Appeal from C. A. 5th Cir. dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-302.
    Small et al. v. Pangle, Treasurer of Kankakee County, et al.
   Appeal from Sup. Ct. Ill. dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-333.
    North v. North.
   Appeal from Sup. Ct. Kan. Motion of appellee for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Appeal dismissed for want of substantial federal question.


text:
    No. 75-5342.
    Matthews v. Kavouklis et al.
   Appeal from C. A. 5th Cir. dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-372.
    O’Donnell et al. v. Antin et al.
   Appeal from Ct. App. N. Y. dismissed for want of substantial federal question.


text:
    No. 75-5252.
    Lee et ux. v. Child Care Service Delaware County Institution District et al.
   Appeal from Sup. Ct. Pa. dismissed for want of substantial federal question.


text:
    No. 75-5169.
    No. 75-5223.
    Breaux v. United States; and Harp v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and cer-tiorari granted. Judgment vacated and cases remanded for further consideration in light of United States v. Hale, 422 U. S. 171 (1975). Reported below: 513 F. 2d 786.


text:
    No. 64,
    Orig.
    New Hampshire v. Maine.
    [For earlier orders herein, see, e. g., 419 U. S. 814.]
   Report of Special Master received and ordered filed. Exceptions, if any, may be filed by the parties within 45 days. Reply briefs, if any, may be filed within 30 days thereafter.


text:
    No. A-323.
    Internal Revenue Service v. Fruehauf Corp. et al.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Motion to vacate stay heretofore granted by Mr. Justice Stewart on October 9, 1975, denied.


text:
    No. A-318.
    Burrafato et ux. v. United States Department of State et al.
   Application for stay of mandate of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and/or stay of deportation, presented to Mr. Justice Douglas, and by him referred to the Court, denied.


text:
    No. A-353 (75-5402).
    Faison v. Washington.
   Super. Ct. Wash., Cowlitz County. Application for stay of enforcement of judgment and sentence, presented to Mr. Justice Douglas, and by him referred to the Court, denied.


text:
    No. D-47.
    In re Disbarment of Mayes.
   It having been reported to the Court that Ronald W. Mayes, of Washington, D. C., and Madison, Kan., has been disbarred from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of Kansas, and this Court by order of April 21, 1975 [421 U. S. 927], having suspended the said Ronald W. Mayes from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred;

It is ordered that the said Ronald W. Mayes, be, and he is hereby, disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.


text:
    No. 73-861.
    East Carroll Parish School Board et al. v. Marshall.
   C. A. 5th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 422 U. S. 1055.] Motion of Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted.


text:
    No. 74-1222.
    Wolff, Warden v. Rice.
   C. A. 8th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 422 U. S. 1055.] Motion of the Attorney General of New Jersey for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae denied.


text:
    No. 73-1596.
    Hampton, Chairman, U. S. Civil Service Commission, et al. v. Mow Sun Wong et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. [Restored to calendar, 420 TJ. S. 959.] Motion for appointment of counsel granted, and Edward H. Steinman, Esquire, of Santa Clara, Cal., is appointed to serve as counsel for respondents in this case.


text:
    No. 74-175.
    No. 74-5176.
    Middendorf, Secretary of the Navy, et al. v. Henry et al.; and Henry et al. v. Middendorf, Secretary of the Navy, et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. [Restored to calendar, 421 TJ. S. 906.] Motion of the Solicitor General to permit Harvey M. Stone, Esquire, to present oral argument pro hac vice granted.


text:
    No. 74-1304.
    Nevada ex rel. Westergard v. United States et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 422 U. S. 1041.] Motion of the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted.


text:
    No. 75-436.
    No. 75-437.
    Buckley et al. v. Valeo, Secretary of the Senate, et al. Buckley et al. v. Valeo, Secretary of the Senate, et al.
   Appeal from C. A. D. C. Cir.; and

Appeal from D. C. D. C. [Probable jurisdiction noted, ante, p. 820.] Motion to reconsider motion of Senator Lee Metcalf for leave to permit oral agrument on his behalf as amicus curiae denied.


text:
    No. 74-1656.
    No. 75-50.
    Moe, Sheriff, et al. v. Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of Flathead Reservation et al.; and Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of Flathead Reservation et al. v. Moe, Sheriff, et al.
   Appeals from D. C. Mont. [Probable jurisdiction noted, ante, p. 819.] Joint motion to dispense with printing appendix and for leave to proceed on original record granted.


text:
    No. 74-1560.
    United States v. Martinez-Fuerte et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 822.] Motion for appointment of counsel granted, and Charles M. Sevilla, Esquire, of San Diego, Cal., is appointed to serve as counsel for respondents in this case.


text:
    No. 74-5566.
    Barrett v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 420 U. S. 923.] Motion of the Solicitor General to permit Robert B. Reich, Esquire, to present oral argument pro hac vice granted.


text:
    No. 75-246.
    United States v. Hopkins.
   Ct. Cl. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 821.] Motion to dispense with printing appendix granted.


text:
    No. 75-5014.
    No. 75-5015.
    Doyle v. Ohio; and Wood v. Ohio.
   Ct. App. Ohio, Tus-carawas County. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 823.] Motion to permit Ronald L. Collins, Esquire, to present oral argument pro hac vice on behalf of respondent in both cases granted. Applications for stay of execution and enforcement of judgments and/or bail (Nos. A-94 and A-96), presented to Mr. Justice Stewart, and by him referred to the Court, denied.


text:
    No. 75-5318.
    No. 75-5441.
    No. 75-5446.
    No. 75-5459.
    Payton v. United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit et al.; Bruce v. Estelle, Corrections Director; Szijarto v. California; and Johnson v. Griggs, Institution Superintendent.
   Motions for leave to file petitions for writs of habeas corpus denied.


text:
    No. 75-5170.
    No. 75-5279.
    Lowe et al. v. Haynsworth, Chief Judge, U. S. Court of Appeals; and Deleo v. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
   Motions for leave to file petitions for writs of mandamus denied.


text:
    No. 75-420.
    United States et al. v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. et al.

      See also note, supra, p. 918.

   Appeal from D. C. E. D. Va. Probable jurisdiction noted.

Mr. Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of this matter.


text:
    No. 75-260.
    McDonald et al. v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co. et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 75-44.
    Burrell et al. v. McCray et al.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Motion of respondents for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 75-76.
    South Dakota v. Opperman.
   Sup. Ct. S. D. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 75-382.
    Federal Energy Administration et al. v. Algonquin SNG, Inc., et al.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Cer-tiorari granted. In addition to question presented by the petition, the parties are directed to brief and argue applicability of the Anti-Injunction Act, 26 U. S. C. § 7421.


text:
    No. 75-5027.
    Bryan v. Itasca County, Minnesota.
   Sup. Ct. Minn. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 74-1434.
    No. 75-41.
    Yellow Freight System, Inc. v. Butler; and Local Union 823, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America v. Butler.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certio-rari denied. Reported below: 514 F. 2d 442.


text:
    No. 74-1511.
    Gross v. United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1629.
    Karrigan et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1648.
    Thompson v. Mississippi.
   Sup. Ct. Miss. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6502.
    Watkins v. Estelle, Corrections Director.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6551.
    Norman v. Clanon, Medical Facility Superintendent.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6611.
    Gamble v. Alabama.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6622.
    Sellars v. McCarthy, Men’s Colony Superintendent.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6624.
    Russ v. Florida.
   Sup. Ct. Fla. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6670.
    Johnson v. Reshetylo, Hospital Superintendent.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6692.
    Rheuark v. Jones, Sheriff.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6697.
    Young v. Superintendent, Maryland Correctional Institution.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6734.
    Morris v. Wyrick, Warden.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6740.
    Thomas v. California Department of Motor Vehicles et al.
   Ct. App. Cal., 3d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6742.
    Brantley v. Sullivan et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-36.
    Davidson v. Kirby et al.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-48.
    Sutton v. United States.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-56.
    Neville v. United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-68.
    Gary-Hobart Water Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board et al.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certio-rari denied.


text:
    No. 75-97.
    Fields v. South Carolina.
   Sup. Ct. S. C. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-99.
    Parlane Sportswear Co., Inc. v. Mathews, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare, et al.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-107.
    Katranis et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-117.
    Ross et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-126.
    No. 75-128.
    Podell v. United States; and Miller v. United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 519 F. 2d 144.


text:
    No. 75-143.
    No. 75-146.
    Duboff v. United States; and Deutsch v. United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 518 F. 2d 727.


text:
    No. 75-153.
    Land O’Lakes, Inc., formerly Land O’Lakes Creameries, Inc. v. United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-154.
    Webb v. United States.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-160.
    Hammonds v. New Jersey.
   Super. Ct. N. J. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-166.
    Fidelity Television, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission et al.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-173.
    MacDonald v. United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-175.
    Griffith v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-187.
    Kelly v. United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-217.
    Spaganlo et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-237.
    Cobb v. United States et al.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-183.
    Coson et al. v. United States et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-228.
    Wellman Industries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-234.
    Sun First National Bank of Orlando et al. v. United States et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certio-rari denied.


text:
    No. 75-238.
    Callahan v. Superintendent of Education of Leake County, Mississippi, et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-240.
    MacDonald v. United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-242.
    Gearheart et al. v. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland et al.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-258.
    Parker v. Lorenz, Acting Librarian of Congress, et al.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-261.
    Bachrodt Chevrolet Co. v. National Labor Relations Board.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-266.
    Kramer, dba Hy Kramer Enterprises v. Duralite Co., Inc., et al.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-282.
    Oliver v. Woodward, Judge.
   App. Ct. Ill., 2d Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-259.
    Gardner et al. v. Nashville Housing Authority of the Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee, et al.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-286.
    Marshall Foods, Inc. v. United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-287.
    Diamond v. United States et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-303.
    In re Bossov.
   Sup Ct. Ill. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-318.
    Shanahan et al. v. New Jersey State Board of Education et al.
   Super. Ct. N. J. Certio-rari denied.


text:
    No. 75-323.
    In re Berry.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certio-rari denied.


text:
    No. 75-330.
    Satoskar v. Indiana Real Estate Commission et al.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-332.
    First California Co. et al. v. Newman.
   Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-337.
    Copeland v. First Federal Savings & Loan Association of Lake County et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-344.
    Smitheal v. Smitheal.
   Ct. Civ. App. Tex., 2d Sup. Jud. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-345.
    Haverhill Manor, Inc. v. Commissioner of Public Welfare et al.
   Sup. Jud. Ct. Mass. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-346.
    Schanbarger v. Kellogg et al.
   Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-347.
    Hinish v. Hinish.
   Ct. Sp. App. Md. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-349.
    Umphres v. Shell Oil Co.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-363.
    Wood, dba National Photo Services v. Chace Company Advertising, Inc., et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-364.
    Connor v. Hutto.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-365.
    Winkleman et al. v. Blyth & Co., Inc., et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-367.
    In re Parker Square, Inc.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-368.
    Torres v. Colorado.
   Ct. App. Colo. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-373.
    Somberg et al. v. Anderson et al.
   Sup. Ct. N. J. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 76-374.
    Warren v. Killory, Superintendent of Schools, Brockton, Massachusetts, et al.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-376.
    Grippe v. Frank.
   App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 2d Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-381.
    Chacon et al. v. Granata et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-383.
    City of Louisville et al. v. Glasson.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-394.
    Board of Education of City of Detroit et al. v. Milliken, Governor of Michigan, et al.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-397.
    Louie, dba Waterhole #1 v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control of California.
   Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-399.
    Norman v. Texas.
   Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-410.
    Cowles Communications, Inc. v. Alioto, Mayor of San Francisco.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari- denied.


text:
    No. 75-412.
    Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Adams; Phillips Petroleum Co. v. First National Bank of Borger; and Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Riverview Gas Compression Co.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-450.
    Porter v. Nossen et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-460.
    Cotten et al. v. Treasure Lake, Inc. et al.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5031.
    Bonner v. Missouri.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5048.
    Irving v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5063.
    No. 75-5115.
    Flick v. United States; and Pierce v. United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 516 F. 2d 489.


text:
    No. 75-5107.
    Maglaya v. Buchkoe, Warden.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5123.
    Barr v. United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5127.
    Peterson v. Goodwin.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5157.
    Lutter v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5159.
    Simmons v. United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5160.
    Perez v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5161. No. 75-5162.
    Newman v. United States; and Hobson v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 519 F. 2d 765.


text:
    No. 75-5164.
    Francischine v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5168.
    Hannig v. United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5165.
    Castellano et al. v. Kosydar, Tax Commissioner of Ohio.
   Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5172.
    Parks et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5173.
    Arney v. Bennett, Governor of Kansas, et al.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5175.
    Laura v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5178.
    Benavidez, aka Chester v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5179.
    Jackson v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5183.
    Wright v. United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5185.
    Kelton v. United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5186.
    Candie v. United States.
   C. A. 4th

Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5188.
    Fannon v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5189.
    Kittinger v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5195.
    Wood v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5196.
    Phelps v. Estelle, Corrections Director.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5198.
    Johnson v. United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5199.
    Archer v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5201.
    Thompson v. Garrison, Warden, et al.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5202.
    Payne v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5203.
    Wishmeyer v. Bolton et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5204.
    Dorrough v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5208.
    Haas v. Boorman.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5210.
    Burns v. North Carolina.
   Sup. Ct. N. C. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5211.
    Jackson et al. v. Michigan.
   Recorder’s Ct. of Detroit. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5216.
    Jackson v. Young.
   Ct. App. Ga. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5217.
    Martin et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5219.
    Simpson v. Wainwright, Secretary, Department of Offender Rehabilitation of Florida.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5218.
    Kohler v. Sandstrom, Corrections Director.
   Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 3d Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5221.
    Sturgeon v. Douglas.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5224.
    Chapman v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5226.
    Anthony v. Vincent, Correctional Superintendent.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5234.
    Martinez-Lopez v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5235.
    Rojas v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5236.
    Robson v. Pennsylvania.
   Sup. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5237.
    Word, aka Hurd v. United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5240.
    Holland v. Perini.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5247.
    Metoyer v. Oklahoma.
   Ct. Crim. App. Okla. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5250.
    Allums et al. v. California; Hickox v. California; and Martin v. California.
   Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5248.
    Norwood v. Michigan.
   Ct. App. Mich. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5255.
    Kleinschmidt v. California.
   Ct. App. Cal.. 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5256.
    Flanagan v. New York.
   App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 2d Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5257.
    Sharlow v. Lucey, Governor of Wisconsin, et al.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5260.
    DaValle v. United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5264.
    Cochran v. Marks et al.
   C. A. 6th Cir'. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5269.
    Washington v. Henderson, Warden.
   Sup. Ct. La. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5272.
    Chapman v. Maryland.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5273.
    Kenyon v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5274.
    Smith v. Riddle, Penitentiary Superintendent.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5285.
    No. 75-5286.
    Stoehr v. Indiana; and Stoehr v. Indiana.
   Sup. Ct. Ind. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 263 Ind. 208, 328 N. E. 2d 422.


text:
    No. 75-5290.
    Anonymous et al. v. Norton, Commissioner of Welfare of Connecticut.
   Sup. Ct. Conn. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5287.
    Byrd v. Guilford County Superior Court et al.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5288.
    O'Shea v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5295.
    Bolender et al. v. Illinois.
   App. Ct. Ill., 2d Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5297.
    Carpenter v. Gray, Correctional Superintendent.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5298.
    Williams v. East Cleveland Police Department et al.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5303.
    Ransom v. District of Columbia Board of Parole et al.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5304.
    Vollin et al. v. Kimbel et al.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5308.
    Wilson v. Ohio.
   Sup. Ct. Ohio. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5313. No. 75-5323.
    Isaacs v. United States; and Washington v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 516 F. 2d 409.


text:
    No. 75-5319.
    Prince v. Common Pleas Court of Allegheny County.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5324.
    Guerrero v. Hauck, Sheriff.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5317.
    Lloyd v. Vincent, Correctional Superintendent.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5327.
    Patterson v. Alabama.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5328.
    Oliver v. Johnson, Correctional Superintendent.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5386.
    Little v. North Carolina State Board of Elections et al.
   Ct. App. N. C. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5390.
    Burks v. Egeler, Warden.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5395.
    Pastet v. Connecticut.
   Sup. Ct. Conn. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5413.
    Moretta v. Moretta et al.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5438.
    Scillion v. Cowan, Penitentiary Superintendent.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5442.
    Aldridge et ux. v. Ludwig-Honold Manufacturing Co. et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5490.
    Clark v. Alabama.
   Sup. Ct. Ala. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-58
    Jones et al. v. District of Columbia Redevelopment Land Agency et al.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Brennan and Mr. Justice Stewart would grant certiorari.


author: Mr. Justice Stewart.

text:
    No. 74-6464.
    Moore v. Illinois.
   Sup. Ct. Ill. Cer-tiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Stewart.

The petitioner’s Illinois conviction for first-degree murder was upheld by a closely divided vote in this Court in 1972, Moore v. Illinois, 408 U. S. 786. Moore had there urged that the state prosecutor’s failure to disclose certain exculpatory evidence violated the principles of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U. S. 83. The Court’s ruling that Brady had not been violated was based on its interpretation of testimony given in a state post-conviction hearing by a prosecution witness named Sanders.

Sanders had testified at Moore’s trial that two days after the murder a person known to Sanders as “Slick” had told Sanders that it was “open season on bartenders” and had confessed that he had shot a bartender in Lansing, a nearby.town. (The victim of’the murder for which Moore was prosecuted was a bartender in Lansing.) At the trial Sanders had also testified to the effect that it was Moore who had made these incriminating statements. In a pretrial statement not disclosed to the defense, Sanders had told the police that he had first met “Slick” “about six months ago” in a local tavern. Evidence adduced at the post-trial hearing proved that Sanders could not have met Moore then because Moore had been incarcerated in Leavenworth Penitentiary at the time, and Sanders acknowledged that Moore thus could not have been the man he knew as “Slick.” This Court viewed these post-trial revelations as indicating only that Sanders had misidentified Moore as “Slick” but not as impeaching Sanders’ trial testimony that it was Moore who had confessed to the shooting of a bartender in Lansing. Accordingly, the Court concluded that “Sanders’ misidentification of Moore as Slick was not material to the issue of guilt.” 408 U. S., at 797. Four Justices in dissent interpreted Sanders’ post-trial testimony as an acknowledgment that “it was impossible that petitioner was the man with whom he had spoken” about the shooting of the bartender in Lansing. Id., at 804

(opinion of Marshall, J., joined by Douglas, Stewart, and Powell, JJ.).

After this Court’s decision, Sanders executed an affidavit stating that it was indeed “Slick,” and not Moore, who had confessed to the shooting of the Lansing bartender. On the basis of this affidavit the petitioner again turned to the state courts in an effort to overturn his conviction. Over the strong dissent of Mr. Justice Schaefer, those courts denied him relief on the ground that Sanders’ affidavit lacked sufficient credibility. 60 Ill. 2d 379, 327 N. E. 2d 324. I do not quarrel with today’s denial of Moore’s petition for certiorari, for we cannot from this vantage point intelligently reassess the state courts’ determination of questions of credibility. I write only to point out that those questions will be fully amenable to reassessment in a federal habeas corpus proceeding. See Townsend v. Sain, 372 U. S. 293.


text:
    No. 75-265.
    Estes et al. v. Tasby et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Motion of respondents for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-380.
    Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Co. v. Dixon.

      See also note, supra, p. 918.

   Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 75-334.
    North v. North.
   Sup. Ct. Kan. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-387.
    Azalea Drive-In Theatre, Inc., et al. v. Sargoy et al., dba Sargoy, Stein & Hanft.

      See also note, supra, p. 918.

   Sup. Ct. Va. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 75-388.
    Board of Supervisors of Fairfax County v. Allman, Trustee, et al.
   Sup. Ct. Va. Cer-tiorari denied, it appearing that the judgment below rests on adequate state grounds.


text:
    No. 74-1426.
    No. 74-6458.
    No. 74-6584.
    Alabama v. Prince, ante, p. 876; Shadd v. Hogan, Warden, ante, p. 846; and Lipsman v. Giardino et al., ante, p. 853.
   Petitions for rehearing denied.


text:
    No. 74-6138.
    Rutherford v. Cupp, Penitentiary Superintendent,
   421 U. S. 933. Motion for leave to file petition for rehearing denied.


text:
    November 5, 1975
    No. 75-5334.
    Bell v. Georgia.
   Sup. Ct. Ga. Cer-tiorari dismissed under this Court’s Rule 60.


text:
    November 11, 1975

    No. 75-434.
    Osage Oil & Transportation, Inc. v. Board of Adjustment of Fayetteville.

      Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of cases in which orders hereinafter reported were announced on this date, with the exception of the following:
      No. 74-1110, Eastern Kentucky Welfare Bights Organization v. Simon, infra, p. 943; No. 74-1124, Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights Organization, infra, p. 943; No. 74-1445, Bynum v. United States, infra, p. 952; No. 74-6411, Birnbaum v. United States, infra, p. 952; No. 75-62, Runyon v. McCrary, infra, p. 945; No. 75-66, Fairfax-Brewster School, Inc. v. Gonzales, infra, p. 945; No. 75-112, Saler V. Kreiger, infra, p. 946; No. 75-150, Flores v. United States, infra, p. 946; No. 75-152, Whorley v. Virginia, infra, p. 946; No. 75-216, Saenz v. United States, infra, p. 946; No. 75-236, Kutler v. United States, infra, p. 959; No. 75-278, Southern Independent School Assn. v. McCrary, infra, p. 945; No. 75-302, Small v. Pangle, infra, p. 944; No. 75-306, McCrary v. Runyon, infra, p. 945; No. 75-377, Ludwig v. Massachusetts, infra, p. 945; No. 75-428, McKinney v. Parsons, infra, p. 960; No. 75-434, Osage Oil & Transportation, Inc. v. Board of Adjustment of Fayetteville, infra, this page; No. 75-467, Wiethe v. Curry, infra, this page; and No. 75-5046, Quesada v. United States, infra, p. 946.

   Appeal from Sup. Ct. Ark. dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-467.
    Wiethe v. Curry.
   Appeal from Ct. App. Ohio, Hamilton County, dismissed for want of substantial federal question.


text:
    No. 75-5055.
    Ransonette v. Texas.
   Appeal from Ct. Crim. App. Tex. dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5355.
    Russell v. City of Pierre.
   Appeal from Sup. Ct. S. D. dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.


text:
    No. A-396.
    Bonk v. United States.
   Application for stay of order of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit entered on October 29, 1975, presented to Mr. Justice Marshall, and by him referred to the Court, denied.


text:
    No. A-403.
    LeRoy et al. v. City of Houston et al.
   D. C. S. D. Tex. Application for injunction, presented to Mr. Justice Marshall, and by him referred to the Court, denied.


text:
    No. 68,
    Orig.
    Pennsylvania v. New Jersey.
   Motion for leave to file bill of complaint set for oral argument.


text:
    No. 65,
    Orig.
    Texas v. New Mexico.
   It is ordered that the Honorable Jean Sala Breitenstein, Senior Judge for the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, be appointed Special Master in this case with authority to fix the time and conditions for the filing of additional pleadings and to direct subsequent proceedings, and with authority to summon witnesses, issue subpoenas, and take such evidence as may be introduced and such as he may deem it necessary to call for. The Master is directed to submit such reports as he may deem appropriate.

[For earlier order herein, see 421 U. S. 927.]

The Master shall be allowed his actual expenses. The allowances to him, the compensation paid to his technical, stenographic, and clerical assistants, the cost of printing his report, and all other proper expenses shall be charged against and be borne by the parties in such proportion as the Court may hereafter direct.

It is further ordered that if the position of Special Master in this case becomes vacant during a recess of the Court, The Chief Justice shall have authority to make a new designation which shall have the same effect as if originally made by the Court.

The motion of the -United States for leave to intervene is referred to the Special Master.


text:
    No. 69,
    Orig.
    Maine et al. v. New Hampshire.
   Motion for leave to file bill of complaint set for oral argument.


text:
    No. 74-1110.
    No. 74-1124.
    Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights Organization et al. v. Simon, Secretary of the Treasury, et al.; and Simon, Secretary of the Treasury, et al. v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights Organization et al.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. [Certiorari granted, 421 U. S. 976.] Motion of United Methodist Church et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae denied.


text:
    No. 74-1529.
    Henderson, Correctional Superintendent v. Morgan.
   C. A. 2d Cir. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 821.] Motion of respondent for appointment of counsel granted, and Joseph E. Lynch, Esquire, of Auburn, N. Y., is appointed to serve as counsel for respondent in this case.


text:
    No. 75-95.
    Tennessee et al. v. Dunlap.
   C. A. 6th Cir. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 821.] Motion to dispense with printing an appendix granted.


text:
    No. 75-129.
    Suchy v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Motion for leave to file an amended petition for writ of certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 75-302.
    Small et al. v. Pangle, Treasurer of Kankakee County, et al.,
   ante, p. 918. Motion of Illinois Association of Homes for the Aging for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae denied.


text:
    No. 75-353. No. 75-354. No. 75-355.
    Piper et al. v. Chris-Craft Industries, Inc.; First Boston Corp. v. Chris-Craft Industries, Inc.; and Bangor Punta Corp. v. Chris-Craft Industries, Inc.
   C. A. 2d Cir. The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in these cases expressing the views of the United States.


text:
    No. 75-5090. No. 75-5431. No. 75-5507. No. 75-5546.
    No. 75-5589.
    In re Santa Catalina; Thomas v. Wainwright, Secretary, Department of Offender Rehabilitation of Florida; Hargraves v. Gagnon, Warden; Hicks v. Wainwright, Secretary, Department of Offender Rehabilitation of Florida; and Turner v. Black, Warden.
   Motions for leave to file petitions for writs of habeas corpus denied.


text:
    No. 75-5227.
    Brown et al. v. United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana et al.
   Motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus denied.


text:
    No. 75-377.
    Ludwig v. Massachusetts.
   Appeal from Sup. Jud. Ct. Mass. Probable jurisdiction noted.


text:
    No. 75-62. No. 75-66. No. 75-278. No. 75-306.
    Runyon et ux., dba Bobbe’s School v. McCrary et al.; Fairfax-Brewster School, Inc. v. Gonzales et al.; Southern Independent School Assn. v. McCrary et al.; and McCrary et al. v. Runyon et ux., dra Bobbe’s School, et al.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari granted, cases consolidated, and a total of two hours allotted for oral' argument. Reported below: 515 F. 2d 1082.


text:
    No. 75-104.
    United Jewish Organizations of Williamsburgh, Inc., et al. v. Carey, Governor of New York, et al.

      See also note, supra, p. 941.

   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 75-164.
    Pasadena City Board of Education et al. v. Spangler et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 75-342.
    Federal Power Commission v. Conway Corp. et al.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 75-5387.
    Sifuentes v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted and case set for oral argument with No. 74-1560, United States v. Martinez-Fuerte [certiorari granted, ante, p. 822],


text:
    No. 75-455.
    Nader v. Allegheny Airlines, Inc.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 75-112.
    Saler v. Kreiger, Sheriff, et al.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-150.
    No. 75-5046.
    Flores v. United States; and Quesada v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 512 F. 2d 1043.


text:
    No. 75-152.
    Whorley v. Virginia.
   Sup. Ct. Va. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-216.
    Saenz v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6682.
    Clemmons v. Greggs et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6731.
    Wolf et al. v. Illinois.
   Sup. Ct. Ill. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-6758.
    Beishir et al. v. Missouri.
   Sup. Ct. Mo. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-270.
    School District of Omaha et al. v. United States et al.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-301.
    Bauman v. United States.
   C. C. P. A. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-276.
    Taylor et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-314.
    Ritter v. Kleppe, Secretary of the Interior, et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-341.
    Tulia Feedlot, Inc. v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-423.
    Jones v. Kentucky.
   Ct. App. Ky. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-424.
    Jefferson v. Pennsylvania.
   Super. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-425.
    Price v. Kentucky.
   Ct. App. Ky. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-429.
    Weyman v. Pennsylvania.
   Super. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-430.
    Woolfolk v. New York.
   Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-435.
    Cessna Aircraft Co. et al. v. White Industries, Inc.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-445.
    General Electric Credit Corp. v. Grubbs, dba T. R. Grubbs Tire & Appliance.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No 75-452.
    Boeing Co. et al. v. Van Gemert et al.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-448.
    Camaj v. New York.
   App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 1st Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-468.
    In-Cho Chung v. Park et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5009.
    Carter et al. v. Bates et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5018.
    No. 75-5307.
    West v. United States; and Anderson v. United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 517 F. 2d 483.


text:
    No. 75-5028.
    Sotomayer v. Henderson, Correctional Superintendent.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5052.
    Esser v. Jeffes, Correctional Superintendent, et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5058.
    Shire v. Kernan.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5079.
    DeAngelo v. Florida.
   Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 4th Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5082.
    Martinez v. California.
   Ct. App. Cal., 4th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5097.
    Bush v. Walters.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5110.
    Clark v. Campbell, Judge.
   Sup. Ct. Mo. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5125.
    Rivera v. United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5140.
    Lynch v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5171.
    Joyner v. United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5192.
    No. 75-5428.
    Owens v. California; and Bailey v. California.
   Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5200.
    Clingan v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5212.
    Sayles v. Sirica, U. S. District Judge.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5233.
    Jackson v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5238.
    Sullivan v. United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5239.
    Howard v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5251.
    Ponder v. United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5271.
    Montgomery v. Daggett, Warden.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5278.
    Carr v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5282.
    Rivera-Marquez v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5289.
    Williams, aka Stewart v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5301.
    Foddrell v. United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5305.
    Dickinson v. Strickland et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5309.
    Weaver v. Estelle, Corrections Director.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5311.
    Alluis v. United States.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5322.
    Douthit v. Jones, Sheriff.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5326.
    Sullivan v. Hannon et al.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5335.
    Brown v. New York.
   App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 2d Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5338.
    Kees v. Frame, Warden.
   Sup. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5343.
    Price v. Perini, Correctional Superintendent.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5356.
    Burnett v. Georgia.
   Sup. Ct. Ga. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5358.
    Broadie v. New York.
   Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5360.
    Cadena v. Texas.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5371.
    Mink v. Michigan.
   Sup. Ct. Mich. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5381.
    Mackey v. California.
   Ct. App. Cal., 4th. App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5379.
    McCartney v. Lathrop et al.
   C. A.

9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5430.
    Fahrig et al. v. Federated Department Stores, Inc., dba Rike-Kumler Co.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5433.
    Gilbert et al. v. Sterrett, Judge, et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5487.
    Landry v. The Gorredyk et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-5584.
    White v. Alabama.
   Sup. Ct. Ala’. Certiorari denied.

So. 2d 857.


text:
    No. 75-202.
    No. 75-214.
    No. 75-215.
    Ferguson Reorganized School District R-2 et al. v. United States; Berkeley School District et al. v. United States; and Kinloch School District et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Powell would grant certiorari in No. 75-214 limited to question whether a federal court has authority to fix and impose the school tax rate upon the residents of the consolidated school district without allowing the rate to be determined in accordance with Missouri law. Reported below: 515 F. 2d 1365.


text:
    No. 75-409.
    Finkbeiner v. Mattox.
   C. A. 7th Cir.

Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.