text:
    No. 75-1261.
    No. 75-1355.
    Butz, Secretary of Agriculture v. Hein; and Burns, Commissioner, Department of Social Services of Iowa, et al. v. Hein.
   Appeals from D. C. S. D. Iowa. Motion of appellee Hein for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Probable jurisdiction noted, cases consolidated, and a total of one hour allotted for oral argument. Reported below: 402 F. Supp. 398.


source: Caselaw Access Project

license: Public Domain

text:
    No. 75-909.
    Environmental Protection Agency v. Brown, Governor of California, et al.; and Environmental Protection Agency v. Arizona et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 521 F. 2d 827 (first case); 521 F. 2d 825 (second case);


text:
    No. 75-960.
    Environmental Protection Agency v. Maryland et al.
   C. A. 4th Cir.


text:
    No. 75-1050.
    Virginia ex rel. Air Pollution Control Board v. Train, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency.
   C. A. D. C. Cir.


text:
    No. 75-1055.
    Train, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency v. District of Columbia et al.
   C. A. D. C. Cir.


text:
    No. 74-635.
    United States v. Wong.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 74-1106.
    United States v. Washington.
   Ct. App. D. C. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 75-1413.
    Stanton, Administrator, Indiana Department of Public Welfare, et al. v. Bond et al.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Motion of respondents for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and certiorari granted.

Mr. Justice Stevens took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and petition.


text:
    No. 75-1443.
    Mathews, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare v. Sanders.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Cer-tiorari granted.

Mr. Justice Stevens took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 74-6579.
    Washington v. United States.
   Ct. App. D. C. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-968.
    Roeder v. United States
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1043.
    Lebron v. Secretary of the Air Force.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1175.
    Maher, Administratrix v. City of New Orleans et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1188.
    Keiley v. Hinkson, Director, Parking Violations Bureau of New York City, et al.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1190.
    Wyoming et al. v. Kleppe, Secretary of the Interior, et al.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certio-rari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1193.
    Cotroni et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1213.
    Pike v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1218.
    Russo v. United States.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1233.
    REA Express, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board et al.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1273.
    Cowsen v. United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1298.
    American Aluminum Corp. et al. v. Federal Trade Commission.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1320.
    Cooper v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1323.
    McCrane v. United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1324.
    Conley v. Eck et al.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1339.
    Wilson v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1390.
    Harris v. Ulanich et al.
   C. Á. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1391.
    Bisping v. Virginia.
   Cir. Ct., City of Norfolk, Va. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1411.
    Chaffin v. Louisiana.
   Sup. Ct. La. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1412.
    Dunn v. Kapiloff et al.
   Ct. Sp. App. Md. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1421.
    Gulf States Utilities Co. v. Federal Power Commission et al.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certio-rari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1426.
    Bogatin v. Suffolk County Bar Assn.
   App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 2d Jud. Dept. Certio-rari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1428.
    Ford Motor Co. v. Polk.
   C, A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1433.
    Albright, Administrator v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1442.
    Jimmy-Richard Co., Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1457.
    McCloud v. Hayes.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1515.
    Local 17, International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union v. Paramount Transport Systems.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75—6185.
    Arnold et al. v. Wainwright, Secretary, Department of Offender Rehabilitation of Florida.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6204.
    Harbor v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6231.
    Akins v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6258.
    Tennon v. Georgia.
   Sup. Ct. Ga. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6270.
    Rajewski v. United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6303.
    Masterson v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6306.
    Montgomery v. United States
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6311.
    Cepulonis v. United States.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6340.
    Williams v. United States
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6320.
    Guerra v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6362.
    DeLoach v. United States.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6376.
    Holley et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6377.
    Eckenrod v. United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6382.
    Muse v. United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6391.
    Mones v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6392.
    Casey v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6404.
    Valdez v. United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6413.
    Johnson v. United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6415.
    Silva-Gomez v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6419.
    Langins v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6433.
    Cook v. United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6437.
    Bartos v. United States.
   Ct. Cl. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6540.
    Mudgett v. Missouri.
   Sup. Ct. Mo. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6549.
    Whiteside v. Kentucky.
   Sup. Ct. Ky. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6558.
    Miller v. South Carolina.
   Sup. Ct. S. C. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6562.
    Wessner v. Georgia.
   Sup. Ct. Ga. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6563.
    Shannon v. Edwards et al.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6577.
    Corto v. California.
   App. Dept., Super. Ct. Cal., County of Los Angeles. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6580.
    Nabers v. California.
   Ct. App. Cal., 5th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6582.
    Negron v. Motley, U. S. District Judge.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6584.
    Allen v. Lyon et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6589.
    Lee, aka Brown v. Wainwright, Secretary, Department of Offender Rehabilitation of Florida.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6591.
    Burton v. Estelle, Corrections Director.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6593.
    Felder v. Smith, Correctional Superintendent.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6595.
    Stiller v. Ketner’s Cafeteria et al.
   Ct. App. N. C. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6597.
    Harvey v. South Dakota.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6685.
    Chavez et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-735.
    Nickels v. United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Stevens took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 75-1429.
    Yee v. Yee et al.
   Sup. Ct. Hawaii. Certiorari and other relief denied.


text:
    No. 75-1290.
    Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. et al. v. Dixon, Acting Chairman, Federal Trade Commission, et al.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 75-1297.
    California v. Garcia.
   Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1448.
    Commissioner, Department of Correctional Services of New York, et al. v. Mukmuk, aka Cholmondeley.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1295.
    Bryza v. United States
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Stevens took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 75-1072.
    No. 75-1110.
    No. 75-1292.
    No. 75-5922.
    No. 75-6234.
    No. 75-6294.
    No. 75-6343.
    Blanton v. United States, Buffa v. United States, Koehler, Warden v. Chism, Ferris v. Illinois, McCollin v. Britt, Penitentiary Superintendent, Reed v. Del Chemical Corp. et al., Gravina v. Switzerland et al.,
   425 U. S. 935;

425 U. S. 936;

425 U. S. 944;

425 U. S. 938;

425 U. S. 940;

425 U. S. 941; and

425 U. S. 961. Petitions for rehearing denied.


text:
    No. 74-940.
    No. 74-949.
    Colorado River Water Conservation District et al. v. United States; and Akin et al. v. United States,
   424 U. S. 800. Motion of Southern Ute Indian Tribe et al. for for leave to file a petition for rehearing as amici curiae denied.


text:
    June 7, 1976
    No. 73-1915.
    Perkins v. Smith et al.
   Affirmed on appeal from D. C. Md.

Mr. Justice Brennan and Mr. Justice Marshall would note probable jurisdiction and set case for oral argument.


text:
    No. 75-336.
    California State Board of Pharmacy et al. v. Terry et al.
   Affirmed on appeal from D. C. N. D. Cal.


text:
    No. 75-1496.
    Carino v. Grasso, Governor of Connecticut.
   Affirmed on appeal from D. C. Conn.


author: Mr. Justice Brennan,

text:
    No. 75-1119.
    Film Follies, Inc. v. Haas, District Attorney of Multnomah County, et al.
   Appeal from Ct. App. Ore. dismissed for want of substantial federal question.

Mr. Justice Brennan,

with whom Mr. Justice Stewart and Mr. Justice Marshall concur,

dissenting.

Appellant brought this suit in the Circuit Court for Multnomah County, Ore., seeking a declaration that 1973 Ore. Laws, c. 699, § 4, and Ore. Rev. Stat. § 167.060 (10) (1975) violate the First and Fifth Amendments as applied to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment, and asking that enforcement of those statutes be enjoined. The Circuit Court dismissed appellant's complaint, and the Court of Appeals for the State of Oregon affirmed. 22 Ore. App, 365, 539 P. 2d 669 (1975). The Supreme Court of Oregon denied review.

1973 Ore. Laws, c. 699, § 4, provides in pertinent part:

“(1) A person commits the crime of disseminating obscene material if he knowingly makes, exhibits, sells, delivers or provides, or offers or agrees to make, exhibit, sell, deliver or provide, or has in his possession with intent to exhibit, sell, deliver or provide any obscene writing, picture, motion picture, films, slides, drawings or other visual reproduction.
“(2) As used in subsection (1) of this section, matter is obscene if:
“(a) It depicts or describes in a patently offensive manner sadomasochistic abuse or sexual conduct;
“(b) The average person applying contemporary state standards would find the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest in sex; and “(c) Taken as a whole, it lacks serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value.”

Oregon Rev. Stat. § 167.060 (10) (1975) provides:

“ 'Sexual conduct’ means human masturbation, sexual intercourse, or any touching of the genitals, pubic areas or buttocks of the human male or female, or the breasts of the female, whether alone or between members of the same or opposite sex or between humans and animals in an act of apparent sexual stimulation or gratification.”

It is my view that “at least in the absence of distribution to juveniles or obtrusive exposure to unconsenting adults, the First and Fourteenth Amendments prohibit the State and Federal Governments from attempting wholly to suppress sexually oriented materials on the basis of their allegedly 'obscene’ contents.” Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49, 113 (1973) (Brennan, J., dissenting). It is clear that, tested by that constitutional standard, 1973 Ore. Laws, c. 699, § 4, as it incorporates the definition of sexual conduct in Ore. Rev. Stat. § 167.060 (10) (1975), is constitutionally overbroad and therefore invalid on its face. For the reasons stated in my dissent in Miller v. California, 413 U. S. 15, 47 (1973), I would therefore note probable jurisdiction and, since the judgment of the Court of Appeals for the State of Oregon was rendered after Miller, reverse. In that circumstance, I have no occasion to consider whether the other question presented by appellant merits plenary review. See Heller v. New York, 413 U. S. 483, 494 (1973) (Brennan, J., dissenting).

Finally, it does not appear from the jurisdictional statement and response that the obscenity of the disputed materials was adjudged by applying local community standards. Based on my dissent in Hamling v. United States, 418 U. S. 87, 141 (1974), I believe that, consistent with the Due Process Clause, appellant must be given an opportunity to have its case decided on, and introduce evidence relevant to, the legal standard upon which the state judgment has ultimately come to depend; Thus, even on its own terms, the Court should vacate the judgment below and remand for a determination whether appellant should be afforded a new hearing under local community standards.


text:
    No. 75-1430.
    Robinson v. City of Chicago.
   Appeal from App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist., dismissed for want of substantial federal question.

Mr. Justice Brennan and Mr. Justice Marshall would note probable jurisdiction and set case for oral argument.


text:
    No. 75-6605.
    White v. Guild.
   Appeal from C. A. 4th Cir. dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6640.
    Price v. Iowa.
   Appeal from Sup. Ct. Iowa dismissed for want of a final judgment (28 U. S. C. § 1257).


text:
    No. 75-1539.
    Board of Optometry of California v. California Citizens Action Group et al.
   Appeal from D. C. C. D. Cal. Motion of American Optometric Assn, for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Judgment vacated and case remanded for further consideration in light of Virginia Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc., 425 U. S. 748 (1976).


text:
    No. 74-216.
    United States Civil Service Commission et al. v. Ramos et al.
   Appeal from D. C. P. R. Motion of appellees for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Insofar as judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico declares 5 CFR § 338.101 (1976) to be invalid, it is affirmed. Hampton v. Mow Sun Wong, ante, p. 88. Because the current Appropriation Act's exclusion of payments to aliens for positions within the United States does not apply to Cuban nationals like the plaintiff-appellees, Pub. L. 94-91, 89 Stat. 458, the District Court is directed to vacate as moot that part of its judgment holding § 601 of the Treasury, Postal Service, and General Government Appropriation Act of 1973, Pub. L. 92-351, 86 Stat. 487, unconstitutional.

Insofar as appellants seek to appeal from the District Court's holding that 7 U. S. C. § 1961 (b)(1) and FHA Instruction 441.2 are unconstitutional, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The District Court failed to enter an injunction from which an appeal lies under 28 U. S. C. § 1253 and the notice of appeal was not filed within 30 days of any arguably appealable order. See 28 U. S. C. §§ 2101 (a) and (b). The District Court may reconsider its holding in light of Hampton v. Mow Sun Wong, ante, p. 88, and Mathews v. Diaz, ante, p. 67, before it enters a final judgment.


text:
    No. 74-1600.
    Salone v. United States et al.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Chandler v. Roudebush, 425 U. S. 840 (1976).


text:
    No. A-920 (75-1482).
    Geisha House, Inc. v. Cullinane, Chief, District of Columbia Police Department, et al.
   Ct. App. D. C. Application for stay of execution and enforcement of judgment, presented to Mr. Justice Brennan, and by him referred to the Court, denied.


text:
    No. A-1009.
    Crow Dog v. United States.
   Application for stay of execution and enforcement of mandate of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, presented to Mr. Justice Blackmun, and by him referred to the Court, denied.


text:
    No. A-1052.
    Gross v. United States.
   Application for stay of execution and enforcement of judgment of conviction in United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, presented to Mr. Justice Brennan, and by him referred to the Court, denied.


text:
    No. A-1039.
    G. E. M. Corp., dba Gene Thomas Cascade Lounge v. Liquor Control Commission of Ohio.
   Application for stay of judgment of the Supreme Court of Ohio, presented to Mr. Justice Marshall, and by him referred to the Court, denied.


text:
    No. A-1042.
    Mathias et al. v. Derrick et al.
   Application for stay of judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, Waco Division, presented to Mr. Justice Powell, and by him referred to the Court, denied.


text:
    No. 74-6257.
    Gregg v. Georgia.
   Sup. Ct. Ga. [Certiorari granted, 423 U. S. 1082.] Motion of respondent for'leave to file supplemental brief after argument granted.


text:
    No. 75-44.
    Burrell et al. v. McCray et al.
   C. A. 4th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 423 U. S. 923.] Motion of respondents for leave to file second supplemental brief, after argument, granted.


text:
    No. 75-443.
    Carey, Governor of New York, et al. v. Population Services International et al.
   Appeal from D. C. S. D. N. Y. Probable jurisdiction noted.


text:
    No. 75-1157.
    Town of Lockport, New York, et al. v. Citizens for Community Action at the Local Level, Inc., et al.
   Appeal from D. C. W. D. N. Y. Probable jurisdiction noted.


text:
    No. 75-1407.
    Trainor, Director, Illinois Department of Public Aid, et al. v. Hernandez et ux.
   Appeal from D. C. N. D. Ill. Motion of appellees for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Probable jurisdiction noted.


text:
    No. 75-6297.
    Fiallo, a minor, by Rodriguez, et al. v. Levi, Attorney General, et al.
   Appeal from D. C. E. D. N. Y. Motion, of appellants for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Probable jurisdiction noted. Case set for oral argument with No. 75-5952 [Trimble v. Gordon, probable jurisdiction noted, 424 Ü. S. 964],


text:
    No. 75-1312.
    Don E. Williams Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 75-1462.
    Delaware Republican State Committee et al. v. Redfearn et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certio-rari granted.


text:
    No. 75-60.
    Vincent et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-158.
    Board of Trustees of the University of Tennessee et al. v. Soni.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certio-rari denied.


text:
    No. 75-247.
    United States v. Sperling.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-405.
    National Commission on Egg Nutrition v. Federal Trade Commission.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-618.
    Atwell v. Kelley, Attorney General of Michigan.
   Ct. App. Mich. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-784.
    Simon, Secretary of the Treasury, et al. v. Caro.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-828.
    Moses et al. v. United States.
   Ct. App. D. C. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1331.
    No. 75-1332.
    Clayton P. Kehoe Towing Co., Inc., et al. v. United States et al.; and Tanker Hygrade No. 18, Inc. v. United States et al.
   Ct. Cl. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 208 Ct. Cl. 488, 526 F. 2d 805.


text:
    No. 75-1346.
    Boyd v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1347.
    Urdiales v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1364.
    Bugliarelli v. United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1367.
    Schifter v. United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1368.
    Acosta et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1370.
    Pierro v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1374.
    Dowell et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1380.
    Sarah Coventry, Inc. v. T. Sardelli & Sons, Inc.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1383.
    McCorvey Sheet Metal Works, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1437.
    Johnson v. O’Connor et ux.
   Sup. Ct. Conn. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1460.
    Peoria & Eastern Railway Co. v. Penn Central Transportation Co., Trustees in Bankruptcy.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1461.
    Chavez et al. v. State Highway Department of New Mexico et al.
   Sup. Ct. N. M. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1467.
    United States Gypsum Co. et al. v. Jacksonville Business Services, Inc., et al.
   Sup. Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1469.
    Lambertson v. United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1483.
    City of Chicago v. Kenny Construction Co. et al.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1485.
    Ash v. Baker et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1516.
    Fire Officers Union et al. v. Pennsylvania et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1542.
    Warriner v. Fernandez et al.
   Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 3d Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1551.
    Sampson et al., dba Southeastern Industrial Development District v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States et al.
   Ct. Cl. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1608.
    Whitney v. Brann et vir.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1611.
    Mehra, Administrator v. Bentz et vir.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1635.
    Combs v. Texas.
   Ct. Civ. App. Tex., 3d Sup. Jud. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6321.
    White v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6334.
    No. 75-6358.
    Jones, aka Shariff v. United States; and Jones v. United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 542 F. 2d 186.


text:
    No. 75-6338.
    Stewart v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6341.
    Simpson v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6345.
    Fleming v. Gunn, Warden.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6356.
    Lovell v. United States.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6367.
    No. 75-6412.
    Wimberly v. United States; and Fowler v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 529 F. 2d 528.


text:
    No. 75-6369.
    Brown v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6411.
    Nelson v. United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6371.
    Marshall v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6416.
    Freund v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6417.
    Gonzales v. United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir, Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6418.
    Benson et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6421.
    Counts v. United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6422.
    Hergenrader v. United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6426.
    Miranda v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6428.
    Fruge v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied,


text:
    No. 75-6432.
    Rocha v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir,, Certiorari depied.


text:
    No. 75-6436.
    Jackson v. United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6444.
    Carroll v. United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6460.
    Hendricks v. United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6479.
    Milroy v. United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6515.
    Cavanaugh v. United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6532.
    Robinson v. Goynes.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6537.
    Bell v. Wainwright, Secretary, Department of Offender Rehabilitation of Florida.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6559.
    Tabor v. Campbell, Assistant Correctional Superintendent, et al.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6575.
    Miller v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6590.
    Fletcher v. Lewis A. Jammer Co., Inc., et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.,


text:
    No. 75-6602.
    Huffman v. Missouri.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6608.
    Gibson et al. v. California.
   Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6611.
    Slocum v. California.
   Ct. App. Cal., 4th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6613.
    Moore v. Ohio State Bar Assn.
   Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6615.
    Founts v. Pogue, Warden.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6616.
    Green v. Illinois.
   Sup. Ct. Ill. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6622.
    Kittrell et al. v. City of Rockwall et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6623.
    Carter v. Money Tree Co.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6624.
    Fulmor v. California.
   Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6626.
    Melonson v. Wainwright, Secretary, Department of Offender Rehabilitation of Florida.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6627.
    David v. California.
   Ct. App. Cal., 3d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6655.
    Riggins v. Meachum, Correctional Superintendent.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.


author: Mr. Justice Rehnquist,

text:
    No. 75-928.
    Estelle, Corrections Director, et al. v. Justice, U. S. District Judge, et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Motion of respondent inmates for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Rehnquist,

with whom The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Powell join,

dissenting.

The writ of mandamus' is granted sparingly and is “reserved for really extraordinary causes,” Ex parte Fahey, 332 U. S. 258, 260 (1947). It seems to me that the course of this litigation in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas makes it a “really extraordinary” case, and I would grant certiorari to review the decision of the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit declining to issue the writ sought by petitioners.

Sometime prior to April 1974, David Rüiz and óther inmates of the Tekas Department of Corrections sued petitioner Estelle, Director of the Texas Department of Corrections, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas seeking declaratory and equitable relief from alleged deprivations of rights secured to the plaintiffs by the Constitution of the United States. Jurisdiction was based upon 28 U. S. C. § 1343 and 42 U. S. C. § 1983. On April 12, 1974, respondent the Honorable William Wayne Justice, a judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, ordered the Ruiz case consolidated with several other pending causes in the District which he found to involve conimon questions of law and fact, and proceeded, sua sponte, to enter the following additional order:

“This Court having also determined that the public interest will be served by the participation of the United States of America in the consolidated civil action, it is
“ORDERED that the United States of America make an appearance in the above-entitled and liumbered consolidated civil action as amicus curiae, in order to investigate fully the facts alleged in the prisoners’ complaints, to participate in such civil action with the full rights of a party thereto, and to advise this Court at all stages of the proceedings as to any action deemed appropriate by it.”

Not surprisingly, the United States some months later filed a motion to intervene in the action, and to add parties defendant thereto. Despite the familiar rule that an intervenor take the case as he finds it, respondent granted not only the motion of the United States to intervene, but also that seeking to add as parties defendant the Texas Board of Corrections, and the members of that Board as individuals. In addition, the complaint in intervention of the United States sought relief which went far beyond that sought by the inmates, requesting an order enjoining petitioners from the following:

“1. Failing or refusing to provide inmates with a medical care delivery system which is accessible and adequate to meet their medical needs;
“2. Failing or refusing to provide living and working conditions which do not jeopardize the health and safety of inmates;
“3. Failing or refusing to provide inmates reasqnable protection from physical assault;
“4. Failing or refusing to permit inmates reason-: able acpess to the Courts and to public officials for redress of grievances;
“5. Failing or refusing to supervise and control prison officials and employees sufficiently to prevent the systematic imposition of summary and other cruel and unusual punishment on inmates and the systematic denial of due process to inmates.”

Petitioners opposed the unexpected entry of the United States into this litigation, as well as its attempt to expand the issues before the District Court. Respondent, however, refused their request to certify his orders for interlocutory appeal pursuant to 28 U. S. C. § 1292 (b). Petitioners thereupon brought the instant action pursuant to the All Writs Act, 28 U. S. C. § 1651 (a), contending that respondent had so exceeded his authority as to warrant issuance of a writ of mandamus. The Court pf Appeals rejected petitioners’ request for this relief in opinions which indicated that the three members of the panel had divergent views on the issues before it.

While each of the three judges of the Court of Appeals had a somewhat different view as to why petitioners should not obtain the relief they requested, it seems fair to say that the lowest common denominator of these views was an assumption on the court's part that even if respondent’s orders were wholly unauthorized by law, they could not be reviewed by a writ of mandamus. I think this assumption incorrect. And I believe that respondent’s actions in this litigation raise issues of sufficient moment, regarding both the relationship between the Federal Judiciary and the Executive Branch of the Federal Government and that between the Federal Judiciary and the States, that the Court of Appeals’ conclusion that mandamus should not issue warrants plenary review here.

The effect of the actions of respondent is to pit the United States, as a virtually involuntary coplaintiff, alongside the inmate plaintiffs and against petitioner correctional officials. I think it extremely doubtful there is any authority for those actions. Federal Rule Civ. Proc. 24 (b), upon which respondent relied, requires that a would-be intervenor have at a minimum some “claim” having “a question of law or fact in common” with the action sought to be joined. But the United States surely has no claim of its own under the Fourteenth Amendment which it may assert against petitioners, and the rather pallid brief of the United States in opposition to certiorari is discreetly silent as to the source of any such “claim.” Title 42 U. S. C. § 2000h-2 (1970 ed., Supp. IV), which authorizes intervention by the Attorney General in an action seeking relief from the denial of equal protection of the laws “on account of race, color, religion, sex or national origin . . . ,” clearly affords no basis for intervention by the Government on the pleadings before the District Court. The Solicitor General's brief also refers to the fact that the United States has statutory responsibility for enforcing 18 U. S. C. §§ 241 and 242, “the criminal counterpart to 42 U. S. C. § 1983,” but it would seem unlikely that respondent or any other district judge could grant intervention for the reason that the proposed intervenor wished later to institute criminal proceedings against one of the parties to a civil action. In its memorandum in support of its motion to intervene in the District Court, the United States urged that it had “inherent standing to sue to enjoin widespread and severe deprivations of constitutional rights. In re Debs, 158 U. S. 564 (1895).” If Debs, which held that a federal court had authority to issue an injunction against an armed conspiracy that threatened the interstate transportation of the mails, is to be extended to the situation presented by this case, I think the decision to do so should be made by this Court.

In short, the legal assumptions on which the District Court acted involve serious and far-reaching questions which have certainly not been settled by any decision of this Court. And since the relief sought by the inmate plaintiffs in Ruiz, if awarded at all, will run to the individual prisoners, petitioners will be unable to assert any separate claim of error in an appeal from that judgment by reason of the respondent’s orders allowing intervention by the United States. There is a substantial probability, therefore, that the issue here presented will escape review at any other time, and that mandamus is “the only means of forestalling [the] intrusion of the federal judiciary” complained of by petitioners. Will v. United States, 389 U. S. 90, 95 (1967); Maryland v. Soper, 270 U. S. 9 (1926). If there was no legal basis for the respondent to grant intervention on the part of the United States, use of the writ of mandamus in this case would come squarely within its “traditional use . . . confirming] an inferior court to a lawful exercise of its prescribed jurisdiction” Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn., 319 U. S. 21, 26 (1943), for respondent’s action would fall into the category of “usurpation of power” agáinst which mandamus is classically available. De Beers Mines, Ltd. v. United States, 325 U. S. 212, 217 (1945).

Over and beyond these factors, which govern availability of mandamus in private litigation, this case raises issues involving the “delicate area of federal-state relations,” Will v. United States, supra, at 95, in which mandamus must be more readily available in other civil litigations. Ibid.; Maryland v. Soper, supra, at 29. And, perhaps most importantly of all, the Court of Appeals indicated in its opinion, In re Estelle, 516 F. 2d 480, 487 ii. 5 (1975), that intervention by the United States in situations similar to that presented here has been authorized by a number of District Courts in the Fifth Circuit. There is good reason to believe, therefore, that orders such as those entered by respondent in this case will be entered by other District Judges in that Circuit in the future. If this be an improper exercise of their authority, the prospect of its being repeated makes mandamus particularly appropriate. La Buy v. Howes Leather Co., 352 U. S. 249 (1957).

I would grant the writ of certiorari.


text:
    No. 75-6300.
    Garduno v. California.
   Ct. App. Cal., 4th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Brennan and Mr. Justice Marshall would grant certiorari.


text:
    No. 75-6155.
    No. 75-6325.
    No. 75-6397.
    Hicks v. United States, Dawn, dba Game Co. v. Sterling Drug, Inc., et al., Lyon v. California,
   425 U. S. 953;

425 U. S. 942; and

425 U. S. 962. Petitions for rehearing denied.


text:
    June 10, 1976
    No. A-1075.
    Board of Education of the City of Elizabeth, New Jersey v. Byrne, Governor of New Jersey, et al.
   Application for stay of judgment of the Supreme Court of New Jersey, presented to Mr. Justice Brennan, and by him referred to the Court, denied.


text:
    No. A-1079.
    Webb et al. v. Lohr, Judge.
   Sup. Ct. Colo. Application for preliminary injunction and/or stay of order entered by respondent on June 2, 1976 [in People v. Longet], presented to Mr. Justice White, and by him referred to the Court, denied.


text:
    June 14, 1976
    No. 75-1561.
    Chula Vista Electric Co. v. State Board of Equalization of California.
   Appeal from Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist., dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1580.
    McVea et al. v. Board of Directors of the Federal Intermediate Credit Bank.
   Appeal from Sup. Ct. La. dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1569.
    Arizona Public Service Co. v. Arizona et al.
   Appeal from Ct. App. Ariz. dismissed for want of jurisdiction. 28 U. S. C. § 2101 (c).


text:
    No. 74-116.
    Place v. Weinberger, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare, et al.,
   419 U. S. 1040. Petition for rehearing granted and order of November 25, 1974, denying petition for writ of certiorari, vacated. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for further consideration in light of Brown v. General Services Administration, 425 U. S. 820, 824 n. 4 (1976).

Mr. Justice Stevens took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


text:
    No. 74-851.
    Seeber, General Manager, Tennessee Valley Authority, et al. v. Alabama et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Hancock v. Train, ante, p. 167.


text:
    No. 75-811.
    Superior Court of the District of Columbia et al. v. Palmore et al.; and Swain, Reformatory Superintendent v. Pressley.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. [Certiorari granted, 424 U. S. 907.] Motion of respondents for additional time for oral argument granted and 15 additional minutes allotted for that purpose. Petitioners also allotted 15 additional minutes for oral argument.


text:
    No. 75-567.
    No. 75-577.
    Oregon ex rel. State Land Board v. Corvallis Sand & Gravel Co.; and Corvallis Sand & Gravel Co. v. Oregon ex rel. State Land Board.
   Sup. Ct. Ore. [Certio-rari granted, 423 U. S. 1048.] Renewed motion of the Attorney General of California et al. for leave to participate in oral argument as amici curiae denied.


text:
    No. 75-1064.
    Kremens, Hospital Director, et al. v. Bartley et al.
   Appeal from D. C. E. D. Pa. [Probable jurisdiction noted, 424 U. S. 964.] Motion of ap-pellees for leave to proceed further herein in forma 'pauperis granted.


text:
    No. 75-1150.
    City of Philadelphia et al. v. New Jersey et al.
   Appeal from Sup. Ct. N. J. [Probable jurisdiction noted, 425 U. S. 910.] Motion of American Society of Civil Engineers for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted.


text:
    No. 75-1532.
    Hechinger et al. v. Martin, Chairman, District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics, et al.
   Appeal from D. C. D. C. The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.


text:
    No. 75-6787.
    Mayola v. Alabama.
   Motion for leave to file petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.


text:
    No. 75-1301.
    No. 75-1335.
    No. 75-1495.
    Delaware Tribal Business Committee et al. v. Weeks et al.; Absentee Delaware Tribe of Oklahoma Business Committee et al. v. Weeks et al.; and Kleppe, Secretary of the Interior, et al. v. Weeks et al.
   Appeals from D. C. W. D. Okla. Probable jurisdiction noted, cases consolidated, and a total of one and one-half hours allotted for oral argument. In case No. 75-1335, the parties are invited to address particularly questions 1, 4, and 9 presented by the jurisdictional statement. Reported below: 406 F. Supp. 1309.


text:
    No. 75-1552.
    Castaneda, Sheriff v. Partida.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 75-6521.
    Abney et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 74-476.
    Penn et al. v. Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense, et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-734.
    Smith et al. v. Troyan et al.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1000.
    Boire, Regional Director, National Labor Relations Board v. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc., et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1200.
    Nims et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 5th .Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1275.
    Star et al. v. Benton, Director of Finance of Baltimore, et al.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certio-rari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1277.
    A. L. Burbank & Co., Ltd., et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1293.
    Edwards v. Reed, Secretary of the Air Force.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1377.
    Bonacorsa v. United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1378.
    Cosby v. United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1414.
    Donnelly Advertising Corporation of Florida et al. v. City of Miami et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1435.
    Paschall, Executrix, et al. v. Christie-Stewart, Inc., et al.
   Sup. Ct. Okla. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1438.
    Vance v. New Jersey.
   Super. Ct. N. J. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1441.
    No. 75-1445.
    No. 75-1466.
    No. 75-1527.
    White, Mayor of Boston v. Morgan et al.; McDonough et al. v. Morgan et al.; Boston Home and School Assn. v. Morgan et al.; and Doherty et al. v. Morgan et al.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.. Reported below: 530 F. 2d 401 (first, second, and third cases); 530 F. 2d 431 (fourth case).


text:
    No. 75-1507.
    Sloan v. Securities and Exchange Commission.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1518.
    No. 75-1579.
    Pepi, Inc., et al. v. Pitchford et al.; and Pitchford et al. v. Pepi, Inc., et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 531 F. 2d 92.


text:
    No. 75-1512.
    Frierson et al. v. West, Governor of South Carolina, et al.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1519.
    Fahey v. Holy Family Hospital.
   App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1523.
    Karr v. Ohio.
   Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certio-rari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1524.
    Trustees of Reading Body Works, Inc., et al. v. Securities Investor Protection Corp. et al.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1525.
    Nereus Shipping, S. A. v. Compania Espanola de Petroleos, S. A., et al.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1546.
    Knight v. Holder et al.
   Sup. Ct. Miss. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1549.
    Sinclair et al. v. Williams et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1595.
    Lubow v. Hollander et al.
   Ct. App. Md. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1648.
    Deering Milliken Research Corp. v. Beaunit Corp.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6346.
    Gentile v. United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6349.
    Campbell v. Cousins, Warden.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6360.
    Konigsberg v. Vincent, Correctional Superintendent.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6380.
    Ayers v. Cowan, Penitentiary Superintendent.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6385.
    Liddy v. United States.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6395.
    Wofford v. United States.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6408.
    Garton v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.
   Sup. Ct. Wash. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6435.
    Clark v. United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6439.
    Hart v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6441.
    Bottom v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6456.
    Sharpe v. Jones, Correctional Superintendent, et al.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6458.
    Cornish v. United States.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6462.
    Bey v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6463.
    Pope v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6466.
    Sandoval v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6467.
    Barfield v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6478.
    Harley v. United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6484.
    Smith v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6490.
    Escobar-Ordonez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6491.
    Frazier v. United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6510.
    Cain v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6516.
    Collins v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6525.
    Ex parte Tyler.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6531.
    Bettker v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6550.
    Earl et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6565.
    Johnson v. New York.
   App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 1st Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6572.
    Ingenito v. United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6598.
    Phillips v. United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6629.
    Trusley v. Estelle, Corrections Director.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6630.
    Standley v. Arizona.
   Sup. Ct. Ariz. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6634.
    Morgan v. California.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6635.
    Clark v. Kansas.
   Sup. Ct. Kan. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6647.
    Harrison et al. v. Crisp, Warden, et al.
   Ct. Crim. App. Okla. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6650.
    Brown v. South Carolina.
   Sup. Ct. S. C. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6654.
    Horan v. Nealon et al.
   Ct. App. D. C. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6658.
    Bullock v. Cuyler, Correctional Superintendent.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6659.
    DeLee v. Knight, Sheriff, et al.
   Sup. Ct. S. C. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6661.
    Treftz v. Pennsylvania.
   Sup. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6664.
    Bennett et al. v. Oklahoma.
   Ct. Crim. App. Okla. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6666.
    Hohensee et al. v. Grier et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6669.
    Mitchell v. New Hampshire.
   Sup. Ct. N. H. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6673.
    Palmer v. Estelle, Corrections Director.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6678.
    Morgan v. California.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6679.
    Roberts v. California.
   Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. ' Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6697.
    Starr v. Gorski, Executrix.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6698.
    Ball v. Shamblin.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6711.
    White v. Superior Court of Arizona et al.
   Sup. Ct. Ariz. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1026.
    Tyler et al. v. Vickery et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Motion of Atlanta Legal Aid Society, Inc., for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1289.
    No. 75-1299.
    No. 75-1304.
    No. 75-1305.
    No. 75-1308.
    No. 75-1474.
    California Co., a Division of Chevron Oil Co. v. Federal Power Commission; Shell Oil Co. et al. v. Federal Power Commission; American Public Gas Assn. v. Federal Power Commission; Public Service Commission of New York v. Federal Power Commission; Associated Gas Distributors v. Federal Power Commission; and Superior Oil Co. v. Federal Power Commission.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.

Reported below: 520 F. 2d 1061.


text:
    No. 75-1503.
    Texaco Inc. et al. v. Federal Energy Administration et al.
   Temp. Emerg. Ct. App. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 75-1602.
    No. 75-1612.
    No. 75-1613.
    No. 75-1614.
    E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. et al. v. Environmental Protection Agency; Ethyl Corp. v. Environmental Protection Agency; Nalco Chemical Co. v. Environmental Protection Agency; and National Petroleum Refiners Assn. v. Environmental Protection Agency.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Motion of Pacific Legal Foundation for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae denied. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and petitions.

Reported below: 176 U. S. App. D. C. 373, 541 F. 2d 1.


text:
    No. 75-1480.
    Bannert v. American Can Co.
   C. A. Oth Cir. Motion for leave to file an amended petition for writ of certiorari granted. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1653.
    Air Line Pilots Association, International v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.
   C. A. D. C, Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Blackmun took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 75-805.
    No. 75-898.
    No. 75-1210.
    No. 75-1321.
    No. 75-1322.
    Civil Service Commission of New York et al. v. Snead, Sutherland et al. v. Illinois, Quarles, Trustee v. Goodson et al., Crawford et ux. v. Security National Bank, Belcher v. Alabama,
   425 U. S. 457;

425 U. S. 947;

425 U. S. 928;

425 U. S. 959; and

425 U. S. 952. Petitions for rehearing denied.


text:
    June 16, 1976
    No. 75-5929.
    Berríos v. Inter American University et al.
   Appeal from D. C. P. R. dismissed under this Court’s Rule 60.


text:
    June 21, 1976
    No. 75-6742.
    Houser v. Seals, U. S. District Judge.
   Motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus dismissed under this Court’s Rule 60.


text:
    No. 75-1476.
    Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. et al. v. United States et al.
   Affirmed on appeal from D. C. E. D. Pa.


text:
    No. 75-1550.
    Vorbeck et al. v. McNeal et al.
   Affirmed on appeal from D. C. E. D. Mo.

Mr. Justice Brennan, Mr. Justice Marshall, and Mr. Justice Powell would note probable jurisdiction and set case for oral argument.


text:
    No. 75-1326.
    Vice v. Ferguson et al.
   Appeal from Sup. Ct. Miss, dismissed for want of properly presented federal question.

Mr. Justice Blackmun would dismiss appeal for want of substantial federal question.


text:
    No. 75-1553.
    United States Power Squadrons et al. v. Hinden et al.
   Appeal from Super. Ct. N. J. dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1592.
    Davis v. Davis.
   Appeal from Sup. Ct. Minn, dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1649.
    Farnum v. Committee on Character and Fitness, Supreme Court of New York.
   Appeal from Ct. App. N. Y. dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal ivas taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 74-1499.
    Enomoto, Corrections Director, et al. v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California (Wright et al., Real Parties in Interest).
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Kerr v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, ante, p. 394.


text:
    No. 75-969.
    S. D. Cohn & Co. et al. v. Woolf et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc., ante, p. 438.


text:
    No. 75-1481.
    Stover et al. v. Chicano Police Officers Assn. et al.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Washington v. Davis, ante, p. 229.


text:
    No. 75-1728.
    Atkins, U. S. District Judge, et al. v. United States.
   Certificate from the United States Court of Claims dismissed.

Mr. Justice Stewart, Mr. Justice Powell, and Mr. Justice Stevens would accept the certificate.


text:
    No. A-1017.
    Collins v. United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Application for bail, presented to Mr. Justice Marshall, and by him referred to the Court, denied.


text:
    No. 74-1106.
    United States v. Washington.
   Ct. App. D. C. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 905.] Motion of respondent for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis granted.


text:
    No. 75-1002.
    Joseph Skilken & Co. et al. v. City of Toledo et al.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Motion of petitioners to grant certiorari and set case for oral argument with Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp. [certiorari granted, 423 U. S. 1030] denied.


text:
    No. 75-1064.
    Kremens, Hospital Director, et al. v. Bartley et al.
   Appeal from D. C. E. D. Pa. [Probable jurisdiction noted, 424 U. S. 964.] Motion of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae denied.


text:
    No. 75-1261.
    No. 75-1355.
    Butz, Secretary of Agriculture v. Hein et al.; and Burns, Commissioner, Department of Social Services of Iowa, et al. v. Hein et al.
   .Appeals from D. C. S. D. Iowa. [Probable jurisdiction noted, ante, p. 904.] Motion for appointment of counsel granted and Robert Bartels, Esquire, of Iowa City, Iowa, is appointed pursuant to this Court’s Rule 53 (7) to serve as counsel for appellee Hein in these cases.


text:
    No. 75-1450.
    Department of Social Services of Iowa v. West Height Manor, Inc.; and Burns, Commissioner, Department of Social Services of Iowa, et al. v. Hutchison Nursing Home, Inc., et al.
   Sup. Ct. Iowa. The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.


text:
    No. 75-1583.
    Morris et al. v. Gressette, President Pro Tem, South Carolina Senate, et al.
   Appeal from D. C. S. C. The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.


text:
    No. 75-6511.
    Sahley v. California et al.
   Motion for leave to file petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.


text:
    No. 75-6289.
    Moore v. City of East Cleveland.
   Appeal from Court of Appeals of Ohio, Cuyohoga County. [Probable jurisdiction noted, 425 U. S. 949.] Motion of American Civil Liberties Union for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted, provided brief is filed within time allowed for filing of brief of party supported.


text:
    No. 75-1566.
    Case v. Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks et al.
   Motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus denied.


text:
    No. 75-1318.
    Pearson v. Dodd et al.
   Appeal from Sup. Ct, App. W. Va. Probable jurisdiption noted.


text:
    No. 75-1397.
    Juidice et al., Judges v. Vail et al.
   Appeal from P. C. S. D. N. Y. Motion of appellees for leave to proceed in forma -pauperis granted. Probable jurisdiction noted.


text:
    No. 75-1453.
    Wooley, Chief of Police of Lebanon, et al. v. Maynard et ux.
   Appeal from D. C. N, H. Motion of appellees for leave to proceed in forma pau-peris granted. Probable jurisdiction noted.


text:
    No. 75-1439.
    Smith v. United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 75-1510.
    Weatherford, Agent of the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division, et al. v. Bursey.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 75-1473.
    No. 75-1705.
    E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. et al. v. Train, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency; and Train, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. et al.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Motion to consolidate these cases with No. 75-978 [E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Train, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, certiorari granted, 425 U. S. 933] denied. Cer-tiorari granted, cases consolidated, and a total of one hour allotted for oral argument. Cases set for oral argument with No. 75-978. Reported below. 541 E. 2d 10l8.


text:
    No. 75-974.
    West Penn Power Co. v. Train, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1170.
    Kehrli v. Sprinkle.
   C. A. 10th Cir, Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1217.
    Birtle v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1230.
    Cities Service Co. et al. v. Federal Energy Administration et al.
   Temp. Enlerg. Ct. App. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1259.
    Marathon Oil Co. v. Federal Energy Administration et al.
   Temp. Emerg. Ct. App. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1310.
    Esser v. United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1313.
    Collins v. Iowa.
   Sup. Ct. Iowa. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1315.
    Lindsey et al. v. Louisiana through the Sabine River Authority.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certio-rari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1317.
    Zarkos et al. v. Superior Court of California, County of San Diego (Riggs, Real Party in Interest).
   Ct. App. Cal., 4th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1353.
    Burleson v. Friedli et al.
   Ct. App. D. C. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1363.
    Alessio v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1365.
    Wheeler v. Florida.
   Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 4th Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1366.
    Garner v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1372.
    Mules v. United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1379.
    Meyer v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1389.
    Finfrock et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1396.
    Rochelle v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir, Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1399.
    Warin v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1400.
    Pena v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1436.
    Oil Shale Corp. et al. v. Kleppe, Secretary of the Interior.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1458.
    Roberts v. Ohio.
   Ct. App. Ohio, Ma-honing County. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1471.
    Civic Telecasting Corp. v. Federal Communications Commission et al.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1509.
    Phillips v. Ford, President of the United States.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1563.
    Ahlman et ux. v. Durbin et al.
   Sup. Ct. Ky. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1570.
    Kansas v. Farha et al.
   Sup. Ct., Kan. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1573.
    Richards v. Howard University et al.
   Ct. App. D. C. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1589.
    Alcor Aviation, Inc. v. Radair, Inc.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1601.
    Goodman et al. v. Lizza & Sons, Inc., et al.
   Super. Ct. N. J. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1603.
    Ditlow v. Pan American World Airways et al.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1607.
    Lackawanna Power Squadron et al. v. Hinden et al.
   Sup. Ct. N. J. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1617.
    Riley et al. v. Stephens et al.
   Sup, Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1655.
    Lagorio v. Board of Trade of the City of Chicago et al.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1668.
    Incorporated Village of Roslyn Harbor et al. v. Jewish Reconstructionist Synagogue of the North Shore, Inc.
   Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied,


text:
    No. 75-6246.
    Dunn v. Illinois.
   App, Ct, Ill., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied,


text:
    No. 75-6272.
    Cole, aka Kol v. Illinois.
   Sup. Ct. I}1, Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6364.
    Reese v. United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6401.
    Walker v. Minnesota.
   Sup. Ct. Minn. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6424.
    DiGiangiemo v. Olgiatti, Chairman, New York State Board of Parole.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6431.
    Green v. New Mexico.
   Ct. App. N, M. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6434.
    Gill v. Cupp, Penitentiary Superintendent.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6446.
    No. 75-6468.
    Duvall v. United States; and Jones v. United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 537 F. 2d 15.


text:
    No. 75-6449.
    No. 75-6470.
    O'Meally v. United States; and Mayes v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 529 F. 2d 5271


text:
    No. 75-6464.
    Johnson v. United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6471.
    Jewell v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6480.
    Bryan v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6481.
    Johnson v. United Stated.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6483.
    Jackson v. United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6493.
    Hunter, aka Peters, et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6503.
    Bolton v. United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6504.
    Brant v. United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6505.
    Matthews v. United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6507.
    No. 75-6512.
    Patrick v. United States; and Allen v. United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied,


text:
    No. 75-6508.
    Glover v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6513.
    Poff v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6514.
    Austin v. United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6517.
    Raymond v. United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6518.
    Rice v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6519.
    Zamora v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6530.
    Knight v. United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6539.
    Belina v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6546.
    Sandoval v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6547.
    Zamudio-Aguilar v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6564.
    Duke v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6567.
    Pipkins v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6570.
    Oaks v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6576.
    Hoffman v. Ohio.
   Ct. App. Ohio, Lucas County. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6579.
    Shea v. Roudebush, Administrator, Veterans' Administration.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari. denied.


text:
    No. 75-6588.
    Cooley v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6609.
    Millanes-Ruiz v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 65-6671.
    Mitchell v. New York.
   Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6674.
    Morse v. Illinois.
   App. Ct. Ill., 5th Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6690.
    Stokes v. Estelle, Corrections Director.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6692.
    Pilcher v. Estelle, Corrections Director.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6696.
    Jones v. Illinois.
   App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6704.
    Gonzales v. Israel.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6705.
    Tyczkowski v. Skonieczka, Warden.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6707.
    Bellew v. Gunn, Warden.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6718.
    Moore v. Estelle, Corrections Director.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6719.
    Johnson v. Estelle, Corrections Director.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1349.
    Villano et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 75-6725.
    Omernick v. Wisconsin.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-6755.
    Meadows v. Michigan et al.
   C. A. 6th Cir, Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1384.
    Estelle, Corrections Director v. Alberti.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1431.
    Stern v. United States et al.
   C- A. 6th Cir. Motion to substitute Emma Louise Gardner, Executrix of Estate of Malcolm P. Gardner, in place of respondent Malcolm P. Gardner, deceased, granted. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 75-1582.
    Toia, Acting Commissioner, Department of Social Services of New York v. Holley et al.
   C. A. 2^ Cir. Motion of respondents Holley et al. for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied,


text:
    No. 75-6689.
    Stevenson v. Mathews, Warden.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Stevens took no part in the consideration or decision of this petir tion.


text:
    No. 74-676.
    No. 75-130.
    No. 75-1186.
    No. 75-1405.
    Estelle, Corrections Director v. Williams, Quinn, Commissioner, Chicago Fire Department v. Muscare, Bromberg v. Chairman, U. S. Civil Service Commission, et al., Marshall Field & Co. v. Shoup,
   425 U. S. 501;

425 U. S. 560;

425 U. S. 963; and

425 U. S. 981. Petitions for rehearing denied.

Mr. Justice Stevens took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.


text:
    No. 75-110.
    No. 75-1240.
    No. 75-6152.
    Sakraida v. Ag Pro, Inc., Rodriguez et al. v. United States, Preston, aka Rilla v. Gray, Warden,
   425 U. S. 273 ;

425 U. S. 999; and

425 U. S. 976. Petitions for rehearing denied.


text:
    June 23, 1976
    No. 75-6788.
    Howell v. Mississippi State Probation and Parole Board; and Brooks v. Mississippi State Probation and Parole Board.
   Sup. Ct. Miss. Certiorari dismissed under this Court’s Rule 60. Reported below: 330 So. 2d 565 (first case); 330 So. 2d 567 (second case).