source: Caselaw Access Project

license: Public Domain

text:
    No. 87-7336.
    Hintz v. Kincheloe, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary, et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 87-7337.
    Carroll v. Central Prison et al.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 87-7338.
    Aranda-Rodriguez v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 87-7339.
    Hall v. Rogers, Superintendent, Caswell Unit.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 87-7340.
    Cassell v. Texas et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 87-7341.
    Alvarado v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 87-7342.
    Moore v. Jaworsky et al.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 87-7343.
    Rose v. Oklahoma.
   Ct. Crim. App. Okla. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 87-7344.
    Skibinski v. New York City Commission on Human Rights.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 87-7345.
    Simpson v. Upper Providence Township Police Department et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 87-7348.
    Williams v. Dutton, Warden, et al.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 87-7350.
    Laroque v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 87-7351.
    Hill v. United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-2.
    Mislivecek v. Wisconsin.
   Ct. App. Wis. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-3.
    Campbell et al. v. Fair, Commissioner, Massachusetts Department of Correction.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-4.
    Van Voorhis & Skaggs v. Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-6.
    Corr et al. v. Hinds.
   Sup. Jud. Ct. Me. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-8.
    Ferry v. Department of the Navy.
   C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-9.
    Phone-Mate, Inc. v. Fortel Corp.
   C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-11.
    O’Malley v. Xerox Corp. et al.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-13.
    Eisenhauer v. Texas.
   Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-15.
    Chipman Freight Services, a Division of Chipman Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board (Brotherhood of Teamsters & Auto Truckdrivers Local 70 of Alameda County, Real Party in Interest).
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-17.
    Herman Brothers, Inc., et al. v. Teamsters Local Union No. 430.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-18.
    City of New Haven, Connecticut v. Marsh, Secretary of the Army, et al.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-19.
    Kalvans v. Court of Appeals of Michigan.
   Sup. Ct. Mich. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-21.
    No. 88-43.
    Hendrickson Brothers, Inc. v. New York; and Lizza Industries, Inc. v. New York.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-26.
    Carmouche v. Auster Oil & Gas, Inc.
   CL A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-29.
    Boscio v. United States.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-30.
    Horn & Hardart Co. v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-31.
    Lewis v. Midwestern State University et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-33.
    Bledsoe v. United States.
   Ct. Mil. App. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-35.
    Feiss v. Veterans Administration.
   C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-38.
    Northwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission.
   Ct. App. Minn. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-44.
    Child, Inc. v. Texas Employment Commission.
   Ct. App. Tex., 3d Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-45.
    Spillane v. Spillane.
   Sup. Ct. Nev. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-46.
    Behning et ux. v. Camelback Ski Corp.
   Ct. App. Md. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-48.
    Praet v. Kingsley.
   Ct. App. Cal., 4th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-51.
    Mallen v. United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-54.
    Vitiello et al. v. I. Kahlowsky & Co. et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-56.
    Kane v. Emrani et al.
   Ct. App. Colo. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-57.
    Friedman v. Hall et al.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-59.
    United Steel & Wire Co. v. Stallworth et al.
   Ct. App. Mich. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-62.
    Olson v. United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-65.
    Green v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-67.
    Allen Organ Co. v. Kimball International, Inc., et al.
   C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-68.
    Delay v. Georgia.
   Sup. Ct. Ga. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-69.
    Greanias v. Wrigley.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-71.
    Wedinger et ux. v. Goldberger, Assistant Regional Attorney, Department of Environmental Conservation, et al.
   Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-75.
    Ellis v. Texas.
   Ct. App. Tex., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-77.
    Ureste v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-78.
    Doe, by her Parent and Natural Guardian, Doe v. Sobol, Commissioner, New York State Education Department.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-79.
    $173,081.04 in United States Currency et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-80.
    Holywell Corp. et al. v. Smith, Trustee of the Miami Center Liquidating Trust, et al.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-83.
    Economou et ux. v. United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-84.
    John v. City of Salamanca et al.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-85.
    Pilarowski v. Macomb County.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-86.
    Shelter Creek Development Corp. et al. v. City of Oxnard.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-87.
    Production Credit Association of Northern Ohio et al. v. Farm Credit Administration et al.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-88.
    Illinois v. Struebin, Ancillary Administrator of the Estate of Struebin, et al.
   Sup. Ct. Iowa. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-91.
    Walker et al. v. Bello et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-92.
    Khalil v. University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey-New Jersey Medical School.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-98.
    Perkinson et al. v. Manion et al.
   App. Ct. 111., 5th Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-99.
    Williams v. Hepting et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-100.
    Polychron v. United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. . Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-101.
    Blackwelder v. Virginia.
   Ct. App. Va. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-103.
    Bigford v. Taylor, Individually and as Sheriff of Galveston County, Texas, et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-104.
    Eischen v. Kaney, Circuit Judge, Orange County, Florida, et al.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-105.
    Alabama v. Weeks.
   Sup. Ct. Ala. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-107.
    Circuit Court of the 19th Judicial Circuit, Lake County, Illinois v. Lovinger.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-108.
    North San Diego County Transit Development Board, dba North County Transit District, et al.
      v. Haynes et al.
   Ct. App. Cal., 4th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-109.
    American Protein Corp. v. AB Volvo et al.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-111.
    Austin et al. v. City and County of Honolulu.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-112.
    McDowell et ux. v. Credit Bureaus of Southeast Missouri, Inc.
   Sup. Ct. Mo. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-114.
    Qureshi v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-116.
    Stern v. Leucadia National Corp. et al.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-117.
    Tony and Susan Alamo Foundation v. Ragland, Commissioner of the Arkansas Department of Finance and Administration, et al.
   Sup. Ct. Ark. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-119.
    Levin, dba Levin Beauty Supply et al. v. Redken Laboratories, Inc.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-123.
    Collins v. Associated Pathologists, Ltd., et al.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-125.
    Simon et al. v. F/S Airlease II, Inc., et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-126.
    Marshall et al. v. Western Grain Co., Inc., et al.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-128.
    Cincotti v. United States.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-129.
    Cooper v. Amster et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-132.
    Scott et al. v. DeMenna.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-133.
    McCarron v. United States.
   C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-134.
    Tharp v. Tharp.
   Ct. App. Wash. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-135.
    DeSimone et ux. v. Bove.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-136.
    Horner v. Tennessee.
   Ct. Crim. App. Tenn. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-138.
    Liberis et al. v. Craig, Trustee in Bankruptcy.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-140.
    Cousins v. United States.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-142.
    Estate of Payne, by Payne, Personal Representative v. Grant County Court et al.
   Ct. App. Ind. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-143.
    City of Philadelphia et al. v. Concerned Citizens of Bridesburg et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-144.
    Syre v. Pennsylvania et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-145.
    Dixon v. Penrod Drilling Co.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-149.
    Summa Corp. et al. v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.
   Sup. Ct. Del. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-151.
    Manzo v. Manzo.
   Ct. Sp. App. Md. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-154.
    Byrd, dba Kilgore Real Estate v. Gardinier, Inc., et al.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-156.
    Davison et al. v. Lowery et al.
   Sup. Ct. Ala. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-159.
    Unisys Corp. v. United States.
   C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-164.
    Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Bracamontes et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-165.
    Romann v. Securities and Exchange Commission et al.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-166.
    Levert v. Levert.
   C. A. -5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-167.
    Finnegan v. Maryland.
   Cir. Ct. Md., Mont-

gomery County. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-172.
    Skaw et al. v. United States.
   C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-174.
    Loebner et ux. v. Franchise Tax Board of California.
   Ct. App. Cal, 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-175.
    Wade v. Goodwin, Director of Arkansas State Police.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-178.
    Brozyna v. United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-184.
    Douglas v. Mapother & Mapother et al.
   Sup. Ct. Ky. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-185.
    Link Manufacturing Co. v. National Labor Relations Board.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-186.
    Tew v. Arky, Freed, Stearns, Watson, Greer, Weaver & Harris, P. A., et al.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-187.
    Gross v. Illinois.
   App. Ct. 111., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-188.
    Palughi v. City of Mobile et al.
   Sup. Ct. Ala. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-193.
    Sciambra, dba Periodical Marketing & Consulting Co. v. ARA Services, Inc.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-194.
    Weaver et al. v. Anderson County Fiscal Court et al.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-199.
    Bell v. United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-200.
    Morgenstern et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-203.
    Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. West Virginia Department of Highways.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-204.
    Schiavone Construction Co. v. Merola, Administratrix of the Estate of Merola, et al.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-207.
    Roberts v. United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-208.
    Wardell v. Diamond Farms Condominium.
   Ct. Sp. App. Md. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-209.
    Autorino v. Connecticut.
   Sup. Ct. Conn. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-211.
    Lehman v. Pennsylvania.
   Super. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-216.
    Andre v. Bendix Corp.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-221.
    Miller v. Kansas.
   Ct. App. Kan. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-222.
    O’Reilly et al. v. New York Times Co.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-223.
    Reilly et vir v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield United of Wisconsin.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-224.
    Hull v. Attleboro Savings Bank.
   App. Ct. Mass. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-225.
    Shaver v. F. W. Woolworth Co.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-227.
    Ferguson v. Norfolk Southern Corp.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-231.
    N & C Properties et al. v. Pritchard et al.
   Sup. Ct. Ala. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-233.
    Kerpelman v. Maryland.
   Ct. Sp. App. Md. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-262.
    Deerman et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-270.
    Foster et ux. v. Milliken.
   Ct. App. Ky. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-275.
    White Industries, Inc., et al. v. Cessna Aircraft Co. et al.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-289.
    Cannon v. Rowen et vir.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-292.
    Reinhard et al. v. Conner.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-303.
    West Coast Truck Lines, Inc. v. Arcata Community Recycling Center.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-312.
    Ledbetter et ux. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-341.
    Gillies v. United States.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5002.
    Eastham v. Oklahoma et al.
   Ct. Crim. App. Okla. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5003.
    Pirovolos v. United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5008.
    Lynch v. Seybert Nicholas Printing Corp.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5010.
    Marshall v. American Motorist Insurance Co.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5012.
    Carpenter v. Reed.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5013.
    Haedo v. United States.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5016.
    Feaster v. Miksch et al.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5018.
    Wren v. United States.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5019.
    Domby v. United States.
   C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5020.
    Jackson v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5021.
    Washington v. Butler, Warden.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5023.
    Seau v. United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5025.
    Townes v. Thompson, Warden.
   Sup. Ct. Va. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5026.
    Shewchun v. United States.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5027.
    Prenzler v. Orange County Board of Supervisors.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5028.
    Smith v. United States.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5029.
    West v. Maryland.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5030.
    Witherspoon, Individually, and as Mother and Next Friend on Behalf of Gaines, et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5036.
    Byrd v. California.
   Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5037.
    Costanzo v. California.
   Ct. App. Cal., 3d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5038.
    Kinnard v. Oklahoma et al.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5039.
    Jeffers v. Duckworth, Superintendent, Indiana State Prison, et al.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5045.
    Patterson v. Kelley, Superintendent, Attica Correctional Facility.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5046.
    Dozier v. Department of Education.
   C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5047.
    Englert v. Small Business Administration.
   C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5051.
    Greeno v. United States.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5056.
    Tripati v. Brimmer.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5058.
    Rodriguez v. Illinois.
   App. Ct. 111., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5059.
    Socey et al. v. United States.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5060.
    Fornino v. New Jersey.
   Super. Ct. N. J., App. Div. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5063.
    Fairchilde v. Moylan et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5065.
    Ingram v. United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5067.
    Duncan v. Lynaugh, Director, Texas Department of Corrections.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5068.
    Dickens v. United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5069.
    Lindquist v. Kelley, Superintendent, Attica Correctional Facility.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5072.
    Barrera v. United States.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5076.
    Causey v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5079.
    Shannon v. Klincar, Chairman, Illinois Prison Review Board, et al.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5080.
    Nieto v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5081.
    Smith v. United States.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5083.
    McKibbon v. Texas.
   Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5085.
    Martin v. Cunningham et al.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5086.
    Martinez v. New Mexico.
   Dist. Ct. N. M., 9th Jud. Dist.- Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5087.
    Gowin v. Illinois.
   App. Ct 111., 5th Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5090.
    Hall v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5093.
    Rich v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5094.
    Littlefield v. United States.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5095.
    Chavez v. Taylor, Warden.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5096.
    Brown v. Ryan, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Dallas, Pennsylvania, et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5097.
    Jones v. United States.
   Ct. App. D. C. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5100.
    Beasley v. Hedrick, Warden.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5101.
    Ibekwe v. United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5102.
    Nicolau v. United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5103.
    Birth v. United States.
   Ct. App. D. C. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5105.
    Bury v. Herrington, Secretary of Energy.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5106.
    Logarusic v. United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5108.
    Hutch v. Hawaii.
   Sup. Ct. Haw. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5109.
    Kusek v. United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5110.
    Bryce v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5111.
    Washington v. Lane, Director, Illinois Department of Corrections, et al.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5116.
    Woolstrum v. Oregon State Board of Parole.
   Ct. App. Ore. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5117.
    Nottingham v. United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5118.
    Simon v. United States.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5119.
    Swinson v. United States Parole Commission.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5120.
    Taylor v. Desmond et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5121.
    Sykes v. Sullivan, Superintendent, Sing Sing Correctional Facility.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5122.
    Richter v. Internal Revenue Service.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5123.
    Prantil v. California.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5124.
    Nash v. Mayfield.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5129.
    Kelly v. United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5130.
    Amos v. Minnesota et al.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5132.
    Couture v. Lopes, Warden, et al.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5134.
    Burrows v. Illinois.
   App. Ct. 111., 4th Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5137.
    Koplow v. City of Portland, Maine, et al.
   Sup. Jud. Ct. Me. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5139.
    Cross v. San Mateo County Transit District et al.
   Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5142.
    Rivera-Medina v. United States.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5144.
    Whiteshield v. Toombs et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5145.
    Samad v. Zimmerman, Superintendent, State Institution (and Diagnostic and Classification Center) at Graterford, Pennsylvania.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5146.
    Johnson v. Irby.
   Sup. Ct. Ala. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5149.
    Spencer v. Danville Police Department.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5150.
    Turner v. Hoffman et al.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5153.
    Sanchez v. Wyoming.
   Sup. Ct. Wyo. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5154.
    Prenzler v. Department of Health and Human Services et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5155.
    Citron v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5156.
    Beach v. Florida.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5161.
    Dotson v. Bohte et al.
   Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5163.
    Ashby v. United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5170.
    Matthews v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5171.
    Nubine v. Texas Board of Corrections et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5172.
    Martin v. Tyson et al.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5175.
    Palella v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5177.
    James v. United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5181.
    Martin v. Gramley et al.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5183.
    Aguas v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5184.
    Shamlin v. Arkansas.
   Ct. App. Ark. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5185.
    Pratt v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5186.
    Ouimette v. United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5187.
    Henderson v. McKellar, Warden, et al.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5191.
    Culverhouse v. Texas.
   Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5192.
    Litchfield v. United States.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5195.
    Watson v. Illinois.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5196.
    Watson v. Alabama et al.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5200.
    Dopico-Fernandez v. Grand Union Supermarket et al.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5201.
    Conner v. Bowen, Warden.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5202.
    Glenna v. California.
   Ct. App. Cal., 4th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5204.
    Szarewicz v. Gardner.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5205.
    Oakley v. Wilson et al.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5206.
    Strader v. Doe et al.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5207.
    Ervin v. Bowen et al.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5208.
    Fixel v. Whitley, Warden.
   Sup. Ct. Nev. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5209.
    Westover v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5210.
    Savarese v. United States.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5212.
    Riley v. Wisconsin.
   Ct. App. Wis. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5214.
    Lechiara v. Southern Ohio Coal Co.
   Cir. Ct. W. Va., Marion County. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5217.
    Johnson v. Lynaugh, Director, Texas Department of Corrections.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5218.
    Bondzie v. Lively et al.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5219.
    Redding v. Allen, Warden, et al.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5220.
    Galberth v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5221.
    Lepiscopo v. Traub.
   Sup. Ct. N. M. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5224.
    Harriatt v. United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5225.
    Aimone v. Scully, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5226.
    Howard v. Johnson, Warden, et al.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5227.
    Leviston v. Black, Warden.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5229.
    Brown v. Boeing Co.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5232.
    Abdul Matiyn v. Edwin Gould Services for Children et al.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5233.
    Kramer v. Butler, Warden.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5236.
    Battle v. O’Keefe et al.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5238.
    Francois v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5242.
    Beach v. Humphreys, Superintendent, Hocking Correctional Facility, Nelsonville, Ohio.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5243.
    Evans v. Fulcomer, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Huntingdon, Pennsylvania.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5244.
    Valenzuela v. Goldsmith, Warden.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5245.
    Smith v. Sowders, Warden.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5248.
    Powell v. Fulcomer, Warden.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5251.
    Nichols v. City of Erie Police Department et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5256.
    Wade v. United States.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5258.
    Thompson v. Housewright, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5259.
    Maulick v. Taylor.
   Sup. Ct. Va. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5261.
    Citro v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5264.
    Davis v. Florida.
   Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 2d Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5275.
    De Young v. Campbell et al.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5278.
    Yarbrough v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5280.
    Szemborski v. First Wisconsin National Bank of Milwaukee.
   Ct. App. Wis. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5284.
    Spinelli v. Lynaugh, Director, Texas Department of Corrections.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5285.
    Richardson v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5288.
    Alcazar v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5296.
    Gray v. United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5302.
    No. 88-5324.
    Lumbar v. United States; and Goodsky v. United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5303.
    Larkins v. Zimmerman, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5304.
    Lun Woon Tam v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5306.
    Landi v. United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5309.
    Pennington v. Gosselin et al.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5320.
    Herrmann v. Thornburgh, Attorney General, et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5321.
    Gonzales v. United States.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5327.
    Gabriel v. United States.
   Ct. App. D. C. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5337.
    Blackston v. United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5350.
    Klein v. United States.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5356.
    Wallace v. United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5358.
    Vence v. United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5361.
    Tarantino v. United States.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5375.
    Hall et al. v. Illinois.
   App. Ct. 111., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5376.
    Ellerbe v. United States.
   Ct. App. D. C. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5379.
    Hefner v. United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5380.
    Zukowski v. United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5398.
    Gibson v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 87-1646.
    Sequoia Books, Inc. v. Illinois.
   App. Ct. Ill., 2d Dist. Certiorari denied.

Justice Brennan and Justice Marshall would grant the petition for writ of certiorari and reverse the judgments of conviction.


text:
    No. 87-1660.
    Illinois v. Marinez et ux.
   App. Ct. 111., 3d Dist. Motion of respondents for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.

Justice White would grant certiorari.


text:
    No. 87-1869.
    Arctic Slope Regional Corp. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission et al.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Motion of Alaska Federation of Natives for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 87-1962.
    Untermeyer v. Valhi, Inc., et al.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 87-2082.
    MacArthur Co. et al. v. Johns-Manville Corp. et al.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 88-5199.
    Graves v. BidNet, Inc.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 87-1968.
    Bello et al. v. Walker et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Motion of Pacific Legal Foundation for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 87-1972.
    Bounds, Commissioner, North Carolina Department of Corrections, et al. v. Smith et al.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Motion of respondents for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 87-1975.
    Sequoia Books, Inc. v. Illinois.
   App. Ct. 111., 2d Dist. Certiorari denied.

Justice Brennan and Justice Marshall would grant the petition for writ of certiorari and reverse the judgment of conviction.


text:
    No. 87-1997.
    Blinder, Robinson & Co., Inc., et al. v. Securities and Exchange Commission.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 87-2085.
    Arkansas State Board of Education et al. v. Little Rock School District et al.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 87-2003.
    No. 87-2004.
    Illinois v. Hernandez; and Illinois v. Cruz.
   Sup. Ct. 111. Motions of respondents for leave to proceed informa pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 87-2080.
    Duckworth et al. v. Mauricio.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed informa pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 87-2102.
    Indiana v. Jones.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Motion of

respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-147.
    Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections v. Waterhouse.
   Sup. Ct. Fla. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-196.
    Florida v. Potts.
   Sup. Ct. Fla. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma- pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-201.
    Florida v. Caso.
   Sup. Ct. Fla. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 87-2016.
    Brandt v. Brandt.
   Ct. App. Minn. Certiorari denied.

Justice Blackmun took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 87-2093.
    Indiana Hospital et al. v. Miller.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Blackmun took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 87-7238.
    Martin v. Shughart et al.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Blackmun took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 87-2025.
    Perez v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co. et al.
   Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied.

The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 87-2027.
    Colorado v. Western Paving Construction Co.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Blackmun would grant certiorari.


text:
    No. 87-2083.
    Mozart Co. v. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice White would grant certiorari.


text:
    No. 87-2094.
    Taub v. Kentucky et al.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Brennan, Justice White, and Justice Marshall would grant certiorari.


text:
    No. 87-2096.
    Oahu Gas Service, Inc. v. Pacific Resources, Inc., et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Brennan and Justice White would grant certiorari.


text:
    No. 87-2123.
    Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services v. Mid-Florida Growers, Inc., et al.
   Sup. Ct. Fla. Motion of Lykes Bros., Inc., et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Certiorari denied.


author: Justice Brennan and Justice Marshall,

text:
    No. 87-6745.
    No. 87-6830.
    No. 87-6956.
    No. 87-6962.
    No. 87-6979.
    No. 87-6981.
    No. 87-7018.
    No. 87-7047.
    No. 87-7088.
    No. 87-7117.
    No. 87-7145.
    No. 87-7158.
    No. 87-7190.
    No. 87-7217.
    No. 87-7235.
    No. 87-7264.
    No. 87-7265.
    No. 87-7335.
    No. 87-7352.
    No. 88-271.
    No. 88-272.
    No. 88-273.
    No. 88-5007.
    No. 88-5009.
    No. 88-5032.
    No. 88-5034.
    No. 88-5049.
    No. 88-5052.
    No. 88-5066.
    No. 88-5075.
    No. 88-5091.
    No. 88-5107.
    No. 88-5112.
    No. 88-5114.
    Thompson v. Louisiana. Coker v. Tennessee. Hamilton v. Alabama. Cone v. Tennessee. Walls v. Missouri. Murray v. Missouri. Harding v. Lewis, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections. Remeta v. Florida. Jones v. Alabama. Andrews v. Texas. Blankenship v. Georgia. Correll v. Florida. Battle v. Missouri. Jackson v. Florida. White v. Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections. Cade v. Alabama. Puiatti v. Florida. Waldrop v. Alabama. Hardwick v. Florida. Poyner v. Bair, Warden. Poyner v. Bair, Warden. Poyner v. Bair, Warden. O’Dell v. Virginia. Jones v. Missouri. Ruiz v. California. Mincey v. Georgia. Jenkins v. Ohio. Thompkins v. Illinois. Buehl v. Pennsylvania. Daugherty v. Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al. Hovey v. California. Howard v. California. Kimble v. California. Mak v. Washington. Fleenor v. Indiana. Middleton v. South Carolina. Stephens v. Kemp, Warden. Johnson v. Oklahoma. Free v. Illinois.
   Sup. Ct. La.; Sup. Ct. Tenn.; Sup. Ct. Ala.; Ct. Crim. App. Tenn.; Sup. Ct. Mo.; Sup. Ct. Mo.; C. A. 9th Cir.; Sup. Ct. Fla.; Sup. Ct. Ala.; Ct. Crim. App. Tex.; Sup. Ct. Ga.; Sup. Ct. Fla.; Ct. App. Mo., Eastern Dist.; Sup. Ct. Fla.; Sup. Ct. Fla.; Sup. Ct. Ala.; Sup. Ct. Fla.; Ct. Crim. App. Ala.; Sup. Ct. Fla.; Sup. Ct. Va.; Sup. Ct. Va.; Sup. Ct. Va.; Sup. Ct. Va.; Sup. Ct. Mo.; Sup. Ct. Cal.; Sup. Ct. Ga.; Ct. App. Ohio, Cuyahoga County; Sup. Ct. 111.; Sup. Ct. Pa.; C. A. 11th Cir.; Sup. Ct. Cal.; Sup. Ct. Cal.; Sup. Ct. Cal.; Sup. Ct. Wash.; Sup. Ct. Ind.; Sup. Ct. S. C.; C. A. 11th Cir.; Ct. Crim. App. Okla.; and Sup. Ct. 111. Certiorari denied.

No. 88-5138.

No. 88-5147.

No. 88-5178.

No. 88-5190.

No. 88-5194.

Justice Brennan and Justice Marshall,

dissenting.

Adhering to our views that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual, punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U. S. 153, 227, 231 (1976), we would grant certiorari and vacate the death sentences in these cases.


text:
    No. 87-6983.
    Munoz v. California.
   Ct. App. Cal, 6th

App. Dist. Certiorari denied.

Justice Brennan would grant certiorari.


author: Justice Brennan, Justice Marshall,

text:
    No. 87-6984.
    Sharp v. Texas.
   Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Certiorari denied.

Justice Brennan,

dissenting.

Adhering to my view that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U. S. 153, 227 (1976), I would grant certiorari and vacate the death sentence in this case.

Justice Marshall,

dissenting.

Adhering to my view that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U. S. 153, 231-241 (1976) (Marshall, J., dissenting), I would grant the petition for writ of certiorari.

Even if I did not hold this view, I would grant the petition to resolve the question whether the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments preclude the introduction of evidence of unadjudicated criminal conduct at the sentencing phase of a capital case. As I recently argued in Williams v. Lynaugh, 484 U. S. 935 (1987), and Devier v. Kemp, 484 U. S. 948 (1987), the admission of such evidence cannot be reconciled with the heightened need for reliability in capital cases.

Petitioner Michael Eugene Sharp was convicted of murder and sentenced to death. At the penalty phase, the State, over defense counsel’s objections, introduced the testimony of Detective Jerry Smith. Smith testified that petitioner, while in custody, had told him where to find the body of Blanca Arreola, a missing Texas woman. Smith stated that he did not know the cause of Arreola’s death. He testified that petitioner had not been indicted for her death and that he did not expect that he would be. The prosecutor’s closing statement repeatedly referred to Arreola’s murder as evidence of petitioner’s future dangerousness. I am troubled that once again a jury faced unproved but highly prejudicial allegations of criminal conduct in a capital sentencing proceeding. I would grant certiorari.


author: Justice Marshall,

text:
    No. 87-6987.
    Lipham v. Georgia.
   Sup. Ct. Ga. Certiorari denied.

Justice Marshall,

with whom

Justice Brennan joins, dissenting.

Adhering to my view that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U. S. 153, 231 (1976) (Marshall, J., dissenting), I would grant the petition for writ of certiorari and vacate the death sentence in this case. But even if I did not hold this view, I would still grant the petition and vacate the death sentence. Imposing the death penalty on petitioner is squarely inconsistent with this Court’s decision in Caldwell v. Mississippi, 472 U. S. 320 (1985), where we held constitutionally unacceptable precisely the sorts of jury arguments employed by the Georgia prosecutor here.

Petitioner was convicted of murder, rape, armed robbery, and burglary, and was sentenced to death for the murder. In his opening statement at the sentencing phase, the prosecutor told the jury it had reached the phase of the proceedings where “ ‘you make the decision as to the punishment.’” Pet. for Cert. 5. But then he continued:

“‘But how did we get to right here? You got here because the district attorney, that’s me, as the agent of the State[,] made the decision to seek the death penalty in this case. Not any of you all but by law the only person who can do that. So you didn’t bring us here. No one else did. That was my decision and that’s why you can choose not to impose the death penalty if you want to, for any reason or no reason whatsoever. But that decision seeking the death penalty was already made. So don’t feel like it is yo urs and have it weigh too heavily on you because that was my decision.’” Id., at 5-6 (emphasis added).

In his closing remarks, the prosecutor again informed the jury that ‘“[y]ou are simply one more step in the procedure.’” He concluded by asserting that by comparison with the victim’s suffering, the jury’s decision was easy: “ ‘To infer or to interfere with justice by saying that your verdict of a proper punishment for William Anthony Lipham is only a life sentence is a joke. A very sad joke.’” Id., at 8.

Allowing petitioner’s death sentence to stand cannot possibly be squared with Caldwell. In that case, we overturned the death sentence in a case in which the prosecutor had noted to the jury that “ ‘the decision you render is automatically reviewable by the Supreme Court.’” We stated there that “it is constitutionally impermissible to rest a death sentence on a determination made by a sentencer who has been led to believe that the responsibility for determining the appropriateness of the defendant’s death rests elsewhere.” 472 U. S., at 328-329. The rationale for that holding was that jurors charged with deciding whether capital punishment should be imposed should recognize that theirs is a “ ‘truly awesome responsibility’ ” and “ ‘act with due regard for the consequences of their decision Id., at 329-330 (quoting McGautha v. California, 402 U. S. 183, 208 (1971)). Dissipating this all-important sense of responsibility, we wrote, could easily result in the jury’s deciding to “ ‘send a message’ of extreme disapproval for the defendant’s acts” without ever having determined that a death sentence was in order. 472 U. S., at 331-332.

The prosecutor’s statement here — admonishing the jurors not to “•‘feel like it is you[r] [decision]’” and urging them not to “‘have it weigh too heavily on you because that was my decision’” — is designed for only one reason: to dissipate the jury’s sense of personal responsibility for this most awesome of decisions. See, e. g., Tucker v. Kemp, 802 F. 2d 1293 (CA11 1986) (en banc) (concluding that a “prosecutorial expertise” argument was impermissible under Caldwell where the prosecutor suggested that others, including the prosecutor and the police, bore partial responsibility for imposition of the death penalty), cert. denied, 480 U. S. 911 (1987).

Nor am I persuaded by the State’s argument that petitioner is barred on direct appeal from raising his Caldwell claim either because of his failure to object at trial or because of his failure to object with more specificity on appeal below. In sanctioning the prosecutor’s statement that deciding whether to execute petitioner should not “‘weigh too heavily on you,”’ the judge committed what can only be deemed a plain error. And in his brief to the Georgia Supreme Court, petitioner — though not complaining specifically that Caldwell had been violated — sought reversal generally because of the “inflammatory and prejudicial” argumentation of the prosecutor, a description which richly applies to the remarks quoted above.

I therefore dissent.


text:
    No. 87-7054.
    Chou v. University of California.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Kennedy took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 87-7076.
    Juras v. Aman Collection Service, Inc., et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Kennedy took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 88-321.
    Daniels et ux. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Justice Kennedy took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 87-7094.
    Brown v. Covington & Burling et al.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari before judgment denied.


text:
    No. 87-7208.
    Brown v. Lurye et al.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari before judgment denied.


text:
    No. 87-7098.
    Johnson v. Alabama.
   Sup. Ct. Ala. Certiorari denied.

Justice Brennan,

dissenting.

Adhering to my view that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U. S. 153, 227 (1976), I would grant certiorari and vacate the death sentence in this case.

Justice Marshall,

dissenting.

I continue to adhere to my view that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment forbidden by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U. S. 153, 231 (1976) (Marshall, J., dissenting). I also continue to believe that the death penalty’s cruel and unusual nature is made all the more arbitrary and freakish when it is imposed by a judge in the face of a jury determination that the appropriate penalty is life imprisonment. See Spaziano v. Florida, 468 U. S. 447, 467 (1984) (Stevens, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part). Therefore, I would grant the petition for writ of certiorari and vacate petitioner’s death sentence for the reasons I expressed in Jones v. Alabama, 470 U. S. 1062, 1063 (1985) (Marshall, J., dissenting).

In this case, after a full hearing, the jury determined that life imprisonment, not death, was the punishment which petitioner deserved. Nevertheless, following Alabama law which allows him wide discretion in death sentences, the trial judge overrode the jury’s determination and sentenced petitioner to death. I continue to believe that “[i]t approaches the most literal sense of the word ‘arbitrary’ to put one to death in the face of a contrary jury determination where it is accepted that the jury had indeed responsibly carried out its task.” Jones v. Alabama, supra, at 1065.


text:
    No. 87-7101.
    Mann v. Oklahoma.
   Ct. Crim. App. Okla. Certiorari denied.

Justice Marshall,

with whom

Justice Brennan joins, dissenting.

Adhering to my view that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U. S. 153, 231 (1976) (Marshall, J., dissenting), I would grant the petition for certiorari and vacate the death sentence in this case. Even if I did not take this view, I would grant the petition in order to resolve the question whether inflammatory and prejudicial photographs of the victim’s body introduced during the guilt phase of a capital trial, and subsequently reincorporated during the sentencing phase, violate the accused’s constitutional right to a reliable sentencing determination. The Court granted certiorari on a very similar question last Term in Thompson v. Oklahoma, 487 U. S. 815 (1988), but did not decide it because the Court found that the petitioner in that case, who was 15 years old at the time of the offense, could not be subjected to the death penalty under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. See id,., at 838, n. 48 (plurality opinion).

The petitioner here, an adult, was convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to death for his role in the same murder which gave rise to Thompson, supra. During the guilt phase of the petitioner’s trial, the prosecution introduced two color photographs of the victim’s body that were taken after the body had been re • trieved from a river one month after the murder. These photographs were reincorporated by the prosecution during the sentencing phase of the trial. On direct appeal, the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals found that the trial court erred in admitting the photographs due to their “gruesome” and “inordinately grisley [sic]” nature. 749 P. 2d 1151, 1156 (1988). The court concluded, however, that the error was harmless because “the case against appellant was sufficient” without the photographs and thus the court could “not find this evidence affected the jury’s verdict.” Ibid.

Significantly, the court never considered whether the introduction of the photographic evidence violated the petitioner’s “constitutional rights by virtue of its being considered at the penalty phase” of his trial. Thompson, supra, at 838, n. 48. The state court’s analysis is therefore fatally flawed in that it did not accord any weight whatsoever to “the qualitative difference of death from all other punishments.” California v. Ramos, 463 U. S. 992, 998 (1983). As to the specific claim, moreover, the petitioner argues convincingly that the photographic evidence created an impermissible risk that his death sentence was based on considerations that are “totally irrelevant to the sentencing process,” Zant v. Stephens, 462 U. S. 862, 885 (1983), because it focused the jury’s attention on the postmortem decomposition of the victim’s body rather than on “the character of the [defendant] and the circumstances of the crime.” Id., at 879. Indeed, photographic evidence of this sort seems no less inflammatory or prejudicial than the victim impact statements deemed inadmissible in Booth v. Maryland, 482 U. S. 496 (1987).

The introduction in capital trials of ghastly photographs of the victim presents substantial and recurring issues of constitutional dimension, see, e. g., Tucker v. Kemp, 480 U. S. 911 (1987) (Brennan, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari), that warrant plenary review by the Court. I dissent.


text:
    No. 87-7116.
    Hale v. Oklahoma.
   Ct. Crim. App. Okla. Certiorari denied.

Justice Brennan,

dissenting.

Adhering to my view that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U. S. 153, 227 (1976), I would grant certiorari and vacate the death sentence in this ease.

Justice Marshall,

dissenting.

Adhering to my view that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U. S. 153, 231 (1976) (Marshall, J., dissenting), I would grant the petition for writ of certiorari and vacate the death sentence in this case. But even if I believed that the death penalty could be constitutionally imposed under certain circumstances, I would grant the petition and vacate petitioner’s death sentence for the same reasons that I expressed in Brecheen v. Oklahoma, 485 U. S. 909 (1988) (Marshall, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari).

Petitioner was convicted for the murder-kidnaping of the son of a prominent local banking family. Pretrial publicity was extensive. All members of the jury had read or heard of the murderkidnaping. Some jurors knew petitioner’s family and some were acquainted with the victim’s family. Six members admitted that they had formed opinions concerning the case. I do not doubt that their representations that they could set aside their opinions and listen to the evidence were sincere. But under the totality of the circumstances, I can only conclude that petitioner Hale, like the petitioner in Brecheen, was denied his constitutional right to a fair trial and to impartial sentencing because of Oklahoma’s strong presumption against venue changes.


text:
    No. 87-7199.
    Lee v. Georgia.
   Sup. Ct. Ga. Certiorari denied.

Justice Marshall,

with whom

Justice Brennan joins, dissenting.

Adhering to my view that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U. S. 153, 231-241 (1976) (Marshall, J., dissenting), I would grant the petition for writ of certiorari.

Even if I did not hold this view, I would grant the petition to establish clearly the minimal due process requirements for state change of venue standards. As I recently argued in Brecheen v. Oklahoma, 485 U. S. 909 (1988) (Marshall, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari), and Hale v. Oklahoma, ante, p. 878 (MARSHALL, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari), a defendant’s interest in a fundamentally fair trial outweighs the State’s interest in holding that trial in a particular district. It is time that this Court consider the constitutional limits on change of venue standards and assist state efforts to ensure jury impartiality. I would grant certiorari.


text:
    No. 87-7303.
    Doe v. Coughlin, Commissioner, New York State Department of Correctional Services, et al.
   Ct. App. N. Y. Motion of petitioner to seal portions of the petition for writ of certiorari granted. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5.
    McCall v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Motion of American Diabetes Association et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Certiorari denied. Justice Blackmun would grant certiorari.


text:
    No. 88-22.
    Vallier et al. v. United States District Court for the Central District of California (Southern Pacific Transportation Co., Real Party in Interest).
   C. A. 9th Cir. Petition for writ of certiorari and/or mandamus denied.


text:
    No. 88-72.
    Pinney Dock & Transport Co. v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. et al.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Motion of C. D. Ambrosia Trucking Co. et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-137 (A-95).
    Gracey v. Day et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Application for stay, addressed to Justice Stevens and referred to the Court, denied. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 86-1944.
    Kwoun et al. v. Southeast Missouri Professional Standards Review Organization et al.,
   486 U. S. 1022;


text:
    No. 87-6801.
    Dawns v. Canon U. S. A., Inc.,
   486 U. S. 1045;


text:
    No. 87-6933.
    Williams v. Planned Parenthood Association of the Atlanta Area, Inc., et al.,
   487 U. S. 1221; and


text:
    No. 87-7038.
    Kinsey v. United States,
   487 U. S. 1223. Petitions for rehearing' denied.


text:
    No. 87-6759.
    Graves v. Brown,
   486 U. S. 1045. Motion for leave to file petition for rehearing denied.


text:
    October 5, 1988
    No. 88-354.
    United States Department of the Air Force, Scott Air Force Base, Illinois v. Federal Labor Relations Authority.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari dismissed under this

Court’s Rule 53.


text:
    No. 88-355.
    United States Department of Health and Human Services, Social Security Administration v. Federal Labor Relations Authority et al.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari dismissed under this Court’s Rule 53.


text:
    No. 88-356.
    United States Department of the Navy, Philadelphia Naval Shipyard v. Federal Labor Relations Authority.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari dismissed under this Court’s Rule 53.


text:
    October 6, 1988
    No. 88-283.
    Paradyne Corp. v. M/A-Com, Inc., et al.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari dismissed under this Court’s Rule 53.


text:
    No. 88-243.
    Sheftelman et al. v. Standard Metals Corp. et al.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari dismissed under this Court’s Rule 53.


text:
    October 11, 1988
    No. 88-295.
    Local Union 598, Plumbers & Pipefitters Industry Journeymen & Apprentices Training Fund v. J. A. Jones Construction Co. et al.
   Appeal from C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of Foundation for Fair Contracting for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Judgment affirmed.


text:
    No. 88-76.
    Crocker National Bank et al. v. City and County of San Francisco.
   Appeal from Sup. Ct. Cal. dismissed for want of substantial federal question. The Chief Justice would note probable jurisdiction and set case for oral argument.


text:
    No. 88-179.
    Jonathan Club v. California Coastal Commission.
   Appeal from Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist., dismissed for want of substantial federal question.


text:
    No. 88-253.
    Pritchard et ux. v. Board of Commissioners of Calvert County, Maryland, et al.
   Appeal from Ct. App. Md. dismissed for want of substantial federal question.


text:
    No. 88-298.
    Market Street Mission v. Bureau of Rooming and Boarding House Standards, New Jersey Department of Community Affairs.
   Appeal from Sup. Ct. N. J. dismissed for want of substantial federal question.


text:
    No. 88-219.
    Mannheim Books, Inc. v. County of Cook, Illinois.
   Appeal from Sup. Ct. 111. dismissed for want of substantial federal question. Justice Brennan and Justice Marshall would note probable jurisdiction and set case for oral argument.


text:
    No. 88-258.
    Rampp et al. v. Gleco et al.
   Appeal from C. A. 3d Cir. dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-377.
    Fraychineaud v. City of New Orleans.
   Appeal from Ct. App. La., 4th Cir., dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-405.
    Ditmar v. Needham Harper Worldwide, Inc., et al.
   Appeal from C. A. 6th Cir. dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.


author: Justice Scalia,

text:
    No. 87-1929.
    Fortney et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Berkovitz v. United States, 486 U. S. 531 (1988).

Justice Scalia,

with whom

The Chief Justice, Justice O’Connor, and Justice Kennedy join, dissenting.

Petitioners in this case were injured by an explosion at an Army munitions plant. They sued the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U. S. C. §2671 et seq., alleging, inter alia, that the explosion was caused by the Army’s failure to observe a provision in its safety manual, AMCR 385-100 §20.4 (1970) (§20.4), Pet. for Cert. 4, proscribing the use of certain types of containers for storage of hazardous materials. After a bench trial, the District Court entered judgment for the Government, 659 F. Supp. 127 (WD Va. 1987); the Court of Appeals affirmed in' a brief per curiam opinion. 841 F. 2d 1122 (CA4 1988). The Court grants the petition for certiorari, vacates the judgment, and remands the case for further consideration in light of our decision last Term in Berkovitz v. United States, 486 U. S. 531 (1988).

In Berkovitz, we held that an agency’s violation of “a specific mandatory directive” — as opposed to the permissible exercise of policy discretion — is not sheltered within the discretionary function exception to the Federal Tort Claims Act waiver of sovereign immunity, 28 U. S. C. § 2680(a). Berkovitz, supra, at 544. The apparent purpose of today’s remand is to allow the Fourth Circuit to determine whether §20.4 is indeed a “specific mandatory directive.” In the circumstances of this case, however, that determination cannot make any difference. To be sure, both the District Court and the Fourth Circuit held — erroneously, as Berkovitz later established — that the discretionary function exception encompassed violations of mandatory Government regulations. See App. to Pet. for Cert. 18A-19A (District Court); id., at 4A, n. 1 (Court of Appeals). But the District Court also found as an alternative ground, after hearing the testimony of three expert witnesses, that the Army’s use of “nonconductive” containers at the plant did not violate §20.4 at all. Id., at 19A. The Fourth Circuit explicitly affirmed this finding after petitioners requested a clarification of the District Court’s decision on the issue. Id., at 4A, n. 1. Quite obviously, a Berkovitz inquiry into the mandatory or discretionary nature of a provision that has in any event not been violated is fruitless.

Petitioners argue in their reply that a different provision of the safety manual, AMCR 385-100 § 12.33(g) (1970) (§ 12.33), which requires use of a sprinkler system with particular characteristics, was also violated. It is not clear from the papers before us that this contention, which was addressed in neither the District Court’s opinion nor the Fourth Circuit’s opinion, and which is not reflected by any mention of §12.33 in petitioners’ Memorandum of Clarification Concerning Waivers of Army Safety Regulations filed with the Fourth Circuit, see App. to Pet. for Cert. 24A-26A, was even preserved on appeal. Assuming, however, that it was preserved, it was not properly presented in the petition for certiorari. The petition states that violation of § 12.33 was part of petitioners’ “theory below,” Pet. for Cert. 12, and reproduces the text of § 12.33 in the preliminary section entitled “Statutes and Regulations Involved,” id., at 5. In the body of the petition, however, addressed to the “Reasons for Granting the Writ,” not a single mention of § 12.33 is to be found, and a section entitled “The Mandatory Regulation At Issue Herein” discusses only §20.4. See id., at 23-24. If this was not an explicit acknowledgment that the § 12.33 claim had subsequently been abandoned, it was at least a plain failure to present that claim to this Court. If the Court’s remand rests upon § 12.33 rather than §20.4, I think it a mischievous departure from this Court’s Rule that only issues presented in the petition will be considered, Rule 21.1(a), and our requirement that the issues be presented clearly, Berkemer v. McCarty, 468 U. S. 420, 443, n. 38 (1984).

I would deny the petition for certiorari.


text:
    No. 88-5215.
    Foster v. Oklahoma.
   Ct. Crim. App. Okla. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Maynard v. Cartwright, 486 U. S. 356 (1988).


text:
    No. A-170 (88-155).
    Texas v. Johnson.
   Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Application for stay, addressed to The Chief Justice and referred to the Court, granted, and it is ordered that the mandate of the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, case No. 372-86, is recalled and stayed pending this Court’s action on the petition for writ of certiorari. In the event the petition for writ of certiorari is denied, this order terminates automatically. Should the petition for writ of certiorari be granted, this order is to remain in effect pending the issuance of the mandate of this Court.


text:
    No. A-176.
    Fort v. National American Insurance Co. et al.
   Super. Ct. Cal., County of Los Angeles. Application for stay and other relief, addressed to Justice Marshall and referred to the Court, denied.


text:
    No. A-242.
    Metromedia, Inc., et al. v. April Enterprises, Inc.
   Application for stay, presented to Justice O’Con-nor, and by her referred to the Court, granted, and it is ordered that the judgment of the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, case No. B022890, entered June 9, 1988, is stayed pending the timely filing and disposition of a petition for writ of certiorari. In the event the petition for writ of certiorari is denied, this order terminates automatically. Should the petition for writ of certiorari be granted, this order is to remain in effect pending the issuance of the mandate of this Court. This order is further conditioned upon the bond presently in force remaining in effect. Justice Stevens took no part in the consideration or decision of this order.


text:
    No. D-686.
    In re Disbarment of Warren.
   Disbarment entered. [For earlier order herein, see 485 U. S. 973.]


text:
    No. D-691.
    In re Disbarment of Newhouse.
   Disbarment entered. [For earlier order herein, see 485 U. S. 984.]


text:
    No. D-712.
    In re Disbarment of Brill.
   Disbarment entered. [For earlier order herein, see 486 U. S. 1030.]


text:
    No. D-714.
    In re Disbarment of Watkins.
   Disbarment entered. [For earlier order herein, see 486 U. S. 1052.]


text:
    No. D-718.
    In re Disbarment of Morales.
   Disbarment entered. [For earlier order herein, see 487 U. S. 1202.]


text:
    No. D-733.
    In re Disbarment of Bussey.
   It is ordered that Robert N. Bussey, of St. Petersburg, Fla., be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.


text:
    No. D-734.
    In re Disbarment of Newman.
   It is ordered that Marvin A. Newman, of Monticello, N. Y., be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.


text:
    No. D-735.
    In re Disbarment of Stoll.
   It is ordered that Peter Richard Stoll, of Los Angeles, Cal., be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.


text:
    No. D-736.
    In re Disbarment of Chesson.
   It is ordered that Calvin W. Chesson, of Charlotte, N. C., be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court..


text:
    No. 86-492.
    Boyle, Personal Representative of the Heirs and Estate of Boyle v. United Technologies Corp., 487 U. S. 500.
   Motion of respondent to retax costs granted.


text:
    No. 86-1856.
    Northwest Central Pipeline Corp. v. State Corporation Commission of Kansas et al.
   Sup. Ct. Kan. [Probable jurisdiction noted, 486 U. S. 1021.] Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted.


text:
    No. 86-1879.
    National Treasury Employees Union et al. v. Von Raab, Commissioner, United States Customs Service.
   C. A. 5th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 485 U. S. 903.] Motion of petitioners for leave to file a reply brief out of time denied.


text:
    No. 87-56.
    Owens et al. v. Okure.
   C. A. 2d Cir. [Certiorari granted, 485 U. S. 958.] Motion of petitioners for leave to file a reply brief out of time denied.


text:
    No. 87-470.
    Fort Wayne Books, Inc. v. Indiana et al.
   Sup. Ct. Ind. [Certiorari granted, 485 U. S. 933.] Motion of Burke H. Mendenhall for leave to intervene denied.


text:
    No. 87-1622.
    No. 87-1697.
    No. 87-1711.
    Brendale v. Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation et al.; Wilkinson v. Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation et al.; and County of Yakima et al. v. Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 487 U. S. 1204.] Motion of petitioner Brendale for divided argument and for additional time for oral argument denied.


text:
    No. 87-1703.
    No. 87-1704.
    Robertson, Chief of the Forest Service, et al. v. Methow Valley Citizens Council et al.; and Marsh, Secretary of the Army, et al. v. Oregon Natural Resources Council et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 487 U. S. 1217.] Motion of respondents Oregon Natural Resources Council et al. for divided argument denied.


text:
    No. 87-5666.
    High v. Zant, Warden.
   C. A. 11th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 487 U. S. 1233.] Motion of West Virginia Council of Churches for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted.


text:
    No. 87-6026.
    Wilkins v. Missouri.
   Sup. Ct. Mo. [Certiorari granted, 487 U. S. 1233.} Motion of West Virginia Council of Churches for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted.


text:
    No. 88-148.
    Southern Natural Gas Co. v. Fritz et al.
   Sup. Ct. Miss. The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.


text:
    No. 88-5088.
    In re Hurt.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Petition for writ of common-law certiorari and/or mandamus denied.


text:
    No. 88-5197.
    In re Aaron, aka Kuran.
   Petition for writ of mandamus denied.


text:
    No. 87-329.
    The Florida Star v. B. J. F.
   Appeal from Dist. Ct. App. Fla., lst 'Dist. Probable jurisdiction noted.


text:
    No. 87-1428.
    Lorance et al. v. AT&T Technologies, Inc., et al.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 88-23.
    Lauro Lines s. r. l. v. Chasser et al.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 87-1661.
    ASARCO Inc. et al. v. Kadish et al.
   Sup. Ct. Ariz. Motions of Alaska Miners Association et al. and Clinton Campbell Contractor, Inc., for leave to file briefs as amici curiae granted. Certiorari granted. Justice O’Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions and this petition.


text:
    No. 87-5765.
    Stanford v. Kentucky.
   Sup. Ct. Ky. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 87-7023.
    Hardin v. Straub.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.


text:
    No. 88-64.
    Missouri et al. v. Jenkins, by her Friend, Agyei, et al.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari granted limited to Questions 1 and 4 presented by the petition.


text:
    No. 88-305.
    South Carolina v. Gathers.
   Sup. Ct. S. C. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 88-317.
    Duckworth v. Eagan.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in fonna pauperis granted. Certiorari granted.


text:
    No. 87-2039.
    Fahmy v. United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 87-2057.
    Smith v. United States.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 87-2067.
    No. 88-246.
    Bankston et al. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co. et al.; and Bache et al. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co. et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 87-2068.
    No. 88-61.
    Alabama Power Co. et al. v. Thomas, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, et al.; and National Coal Assn. et al. v. Natural Resources Defense Council et al.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 87-2114.
    Rodriguez et al. v. United States.
   C. A.

9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 87-7082.
    Procter v. Butler, Warden.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 87-7125.
    Steele v. Felix Chevrolet et al.
   Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 87-7144.
    Carter v. Turner, Warden, et al.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 87-7165.
    Bastidas v. Henderson, Superintendent, Auburn Correctional Facility, et al.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 87-7270.
    Vaughn v. Wilson et al.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-14.
    Toledo v. United States.
   Ct. Mil. App. Certiorari- (denied.


text:
    No. 88-24.
    Campo v. New York City Employees’ Retirement System et al.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-25.
    Celotex Corp. et al. v. Grimes et al.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-27.
    Rusco Industries, Inc. v. McLaughlin, Secretary of Labor.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-39.
    Garcia et al. v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-50.
    Jenkins et al. v. Missouri et al.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-52.
    Buffalo Wire Works Co., Inc. v. Department of Housing and Urban Development et al.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-53.
    Boeing Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-58.
    Fulton v. United States.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-63.
    Department of Public Safety, Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands v. Fleming.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied-.


text:
    No. 88-70.
    No. 88-306.
    Deklewa et al., dba John Deklewa & Sons v. National Labor Relations Board et al.; and International Association of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers, Local 3, AFL-CIO v.
      National Labor Relations Board et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-73.
    Kirk v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-74.
    Ingersoll Milling Machine Co. et al. v. Hydril Co.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-89.
    Golden Pacific Bancorp. v. Clarke, Comptroller of the Currency, et al.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-106.
    Wyatt v. Jouflas et al.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-118.
    Go Air, Inc. v. Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration, et al.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-122.
    County Line Joint Venture v. City of Grand Prairie, Texas.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-183.
    Torres et al. v. J. F. Enterprises, Inc., et al.; and Arnold v. Opfer.
   Ct. App. Ohio, Wood County. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-248.
    Rubloff, Inc. v. Smith.
   Ct. App. Ga. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-249.
    Stitt Spark Plug Co. v. Champion Spark Plug Co.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-251.
    Sidman v. Supreme Court of Florida et al.
   Sup. Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-254.
    Anglicker v. Miller.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-257.
    Rzepka v. Jacobsen.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-259.
    Alton Packaging Corp. v. Pollution Control Board et al.
   App. Ct. 111., 5th Dist.. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-264.
    Vogt v. Abish et al.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-265.
    Badger v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-267.
    Kelley v. Ohio.
   Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-268.
    Williams v. Georgia.
   Sup. Ct. Ga. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-269.
    Stockton v. Lansiquot et al.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-277.
    Seawinds Ltd. v. Nedlloyd Lines, B. V., et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-279.
    Antrim et al. v. Burlington Northern Inc. et al.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-281.
    Sheehan et al. v. Purolator, Inc., et al.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-282.
    Alter et al. v. Schroeder et al.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-285.
    Pacindat Mutual Protection & Indemnity Assn., Ltd. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-286.
    Flynn v. Connecticut.
   App. Ct. Conn. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-288.
    Becnel et al. v. Dupuis et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-290.
    Cannon v. Rowen et vir.
   Ct. App. Cal., 3d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-294.
    Guys & Dolls Billiards, Inc. v. McHale et al.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-300.
    National Rifle Association of America et al. v. Minnesota State Ethical Practices Board.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-301.
    Gill v. Mercy Hospital et al.
   Ct. App. Cal., 5th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-307.
    Mortgage Mart, Inc. v. Rechnitzer, Trustee in Bankruptcy, et al.; and Berger v. Davis, Trustee in Bankruptcy, et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-308.
    Constant v. Advanced Micro-Devices, Inc., et al.
   C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-311.
    Empire Lumber Co. v. Washington Water Power Co. et al.
   Sup. Ct. Idaho. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-314.
    Jackson v. St. Joseph State Hospital.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-316.
    Parks v. Parks.
   Ct. App. Mo., Eastern Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-319.
    Thornbury Township et al. v. W. D. D., Inc.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-343.
    Murphy, Guardian of Prange v. Benson, Guardian ad Litem of Prange.
   Sup. Ct. 111. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-358.
    Thompson v. United States Postal Service.
   C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-360.
    Byron v. United States et al.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-361.
    Lucas v. Philadelphia Naval Shipyard et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-362.
    Wilson et al. v. Kuenzi et al.
   Sup. Ct. Mo. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-366.
    Levin et al. v. Parrillo et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-370.
    Matlock v. Texas.
   Ct. App. Tex., 5th Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-378.
    Boling v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-379.
    Phillips v. United States.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-383.
    Dillon v. United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-388.
    Fairness in Media v. Federal Communications Commission et al.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-397.
    Kaushiva v. Board of Trustees of the University of the District of Columbia et al.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-398.
    Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-407.
    Vance v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-409.
    First National Bank, Lexington, Tennessee v. United States.
   C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-425.
    Levy v. Regents of the University of California et al.
   Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-431.
    Community Federal Savings & Loan Assn. v. Director of Revenue, State of Missouri, et al.
   Sup. Ct. Mo. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-439.
    Leonetti et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-440.
    Newsome v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-442.
    Rivera-Ramirez v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5017.
    Jenkins v. California.
   Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5040.
    Lena v. United States.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5044.
    Levasseur et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5048.
    Balawajder v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5053.
    Spencer v. United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5055.
    Alexander v. United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5057.
    Parez v. United States District Court for the Southern District of California.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5064.
    Fairchilde v. Erickson, aka Schuller, et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5073.
    Gallo v. United States.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5078.
    Doe, a Minor v. United States.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5115.
    Mixon v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5127.
    Aqeel v. United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5128.
    Lewis et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5133.
    Falkner v. Jones, Warden, et al.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5203.
    Walker v. Maryland Public Defender Office et al.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5230.
    Caldwell v. Bureau of Federal Prisons.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5234.
    Flynn v. Florida.
   Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 4th Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5235.
    James v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
   et al. C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5250.
    Sherazee v. United States.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5253.
    Streater v. Williams, Director, District of Columbia Department of Corrections.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5257.
    Wood v. Connecticut.
   Sup. Ct. Conn. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5260.
    Ferenc v. Internal Revenue Service.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5265.
    Fleegle v. Maryland.
   Ct. Sp. App. Md. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5268.
    Kitchen v. Indiana.
   Ct. App. Ind. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5269.
    Bell v. Borg, Warden.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5272.
    Hines v. Illinois.
   App. Ct. 111., 4th Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5277.
    Worley v. West Virginia.
   Sup. Ct. App. W. Va. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5282.
    De Young v. De Koster et al.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5283.
    De Young v. O’Brien et al.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5287.
    Burrell v. Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5289.
    Koehler v. Rees, Warden, et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5290.
    Hines v. Superior Court of California, Sacramento County, et al.
   Ct. App. Cal., 3d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5291.
    Cutler v. Municipality of Anchorage, Alaska.
   Ct. App. Alaska. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5292.
    Chatman v. Cowley, Warden, et al.
   C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5293.
    Cherry v. California.
   Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5294.
    Empey v. Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles et al.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5295.
    Lipsman v. Mason.
   App. Term, Sup. Ct. N. Y., 1st Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5298.
    T. B. v. Iowa Department of Human Services et al.
   Ct. App. Iowa. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5299.
    Garza v. Grammer, Assistant Director, Nebraska Department of Correctional Services, Adult Institutions.
   C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5301.
    Jupin v. Stetzer et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5308.
    Szarewicz v. Joyce et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5311.
    Rogers v. Petsock, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution and Diagnostic and Classification Center at Pittsburgh.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5313.
    Nash v. Ervin.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5316.
    Twitty v. Maass.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5317.
    Pollock v. Marshall.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5329.
    Casamento v. Northern Virginia Mental Health Institute.
   Cir. Ct. Va., Fairfax County. Certiorari denied. •


text:
    No. 88-5331.
    Sheffield v. United States.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5333.
    McClain v. Caputo et al.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5335.
    Fisher v. Riddick, Judge, Madison County, Alabama, Probate Court, et al.
   C. A. 11th Cir.' Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5338.
    Graves v. Thurman, Warden, et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5340.
    Hemphill v. Daily Gazette Co., Inc., et al.
   Cir. Ct. W. Va., Kanawha County. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5341.
    Brown v. New York.
   App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 2d Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5348.
    Bell v. Freeman, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Camp Hill, Pennsylvania, et al.


text:
    No. 88-5351.
    Davis v. McLaughlin, Secretary of Labor.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5357.
    Perales v. United States.
   C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5359.
    Plyler et al. v. Evatt, Commissioner, South Carolina Department of Corrections, et al.
   C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5371.
    Langley v. United States.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5374.
    Jones v. Haberlain, Warden.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5385.
    Payne v. Robinson, Warden.
   Sup. Ct. Conn. Certioi’ari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5389.
    Ochoa-Ochoa v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5395.
    Bermudez v. United States.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5426.
    Daloia v. Rose, Assistant United States Attorney, et al.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5436.
    Mann v. Adams et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-5500.
    Freiwald v. Jabe, Warden.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 87-1565.
    Texas v. Modgling.
   Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Certiorari denied.

Justice White and Justice Kennedy would grant certiorari.


text:
    No. 87-1649.
    Boyle v. Illinois.
   App. Ct. Ill, 5th Dist. Certiorari denied.

Justice White would grant certiorari.


text:
    No. 87-1853.
    Lauritzen et ux., Individually and dba Lauritzen Farms v. McLaughlin, Secretary of Labor.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari deniéd.

Justice White would grant certiorari.


text:
    No. 87-1907.
    Young v. Langley et al.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice White would grant certiorari.


text:
    No. 87-2037.
    Kahn v. Avnet, Inc.
   C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice White would grant certiorari.


text:
    No. 87-2047.
    Feaster v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice White would grant certiorari.


text:
    No. 87-7111.
    Gruenholz et al. v. United States.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice White would grant certiorari.


text:
    No. 88-93.
    Union Pacific Railroad Co. et al. v. Moritz, Trustee of Iowa Railroad Co.
   C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari de-

nied.

Justice White would grant certiorari.


text:
    No. 88-195.
    Kreisher v. Mobil Oil Corp.
   Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.

Justice White would grant certiorari.


text:
    No. 88-338.
    Robinson v. Connecticut.
   App. Ct. Conn. Certiorari denied.

Justice White would grant certiorari.


text:
    No. 88-339.
    Stamler et al. v. Zamboni.
   C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice White would grant certiorari.


author: Justice Blackmun,

text:
    No. 87-1800.
    Robertson, Executor of the Will of Hand v. United States.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Blackmun,

with whom

Justice O’Connor joins, dissenting.

This case concerns the deductibility, under §§ 170 and 2055 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, 26 U. S. C. §§ 170 and 2055, of a testamentary disposition to a nonprofit cemetery, which enjoys tax-exempt status under § 501(c)(13) of the Code. The Solicitor General concedes that such a donation is deductible for federal income tax purposes, but he resists deductibility for federal estate tax purposes. Whether this distinction is legally sound is, I feel, an issue deserving plenary consideration by this Court.

I therefore dissent and would grant the petition for a writ of certiorari. I adhere to the reasons set forth by Justice O’Con-nor in her opinion (which Justice Powell and I joined) dissenting from the denial of certiorari in Mellon Bank, N. A. v. United States, 475 U. S. 1032 (1986).


text:
    No. 87-1864.
    Cleveland Newspaper Guild, Local 1, et al. v. Plain Dealer Publishing Co.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice White and Justice Blackmun would grant certiorari.


text:
    No. 87-1877.
    Hartenstine v. Superior Court of California for the County of San Bernardino, North Desert District (Blue Cross of Southern California et al., Real Parties in Interest).
   Ct. App. Cal., 4th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.

Justice White would grant certiorari. Justice O’Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


text:
    No. 87-7118.
    No. 87-7119.
    No. 87-7136.
    No. 87-7137.
    No. 87-7174.
    No. 88-5074.
    No. 88-5131.
    No. 88-5198.
    No. 88-5300.
    No. 88-5310.
    No. 88-5314.
    No. 88-5330.
    No. 88-5383.
    No. 88-5393.
    No. 88-5440.
    Ashford v. Illinois. Stewart v. Illinois. Emerson v. Illinois. Orange v. Illinois. Green v. North Carolina. Hendricks v. California. Hawkins v. Lynaugh, Director, Texas Department of Corrections. Landry v. Lynaugh, Director, Texas Department of Corrections. Barber v. Tennessee. Parkus v. Missouri. Wade v. California. Williams v. California. Rojem v. Oklahoma. Mercer v. Armontrout, Warden. Coleman v. Ohio.
   Sup. Ct. 111.; Sup. Ct. Ill,; Sup. Ct. 111.; Sup. Ct. Ill; Sup. Ct. N. C.; Sup. Ct. Cal.; C. A. 5th Cir.; C. A. 5th Cir.; Sup. Ct. Tenn.; Sup. Ct. Mo.; Sup. Ct. Cal.; Sup. Ct. Cal.; Ct. Crim. App. Okla.; C. A. 8th Cir.; and Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied.

Justice Brennan and Justice Marshall,

dissenting.

Adhering to our views that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U. S. 153, 227, 231 (1976), we would grant certiorari and vacate the death sentences in these cases.


text:
    No. 88-60.
    Ohio Power Co. v. Thomas, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
   C. A. D. C. Cir. Motion of petitioner to defer consideration of the petition for certiorari denied. Certiorari denied.


text:
    No. 88-182.
    General Electric Co. v. United States et al.
   C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice White and Justice O’Connor would grant certiorari.


text:
    No. 88-5135.
    Torres-Arboledo v. Florida.
   Sup. Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied.

Justice White would grant certiorari.

Justice Brennan and Justice Marshall,

dissenting.

Adhering to our views that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and' Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U. S. 153, 227, 231 (1976), we would grant certiorari and vacate the death sentence in this case.


text:
    No. 88-5276.
    McKenzie v. McCormick, Warden, et al.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Kennedy took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Justice Brennan,

dissenting.

Adhering to my view that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited' by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U. S. 153, 227 (1976), I would grant certiorari and vacate the death sentence in this case.

Justice Marshall,

dissenting.

Adhering to my view that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U. S. 153, 231 (1976) (Marshall, J., dissenting), I would grant the petition for writ of certiorari and vacate the death sentence in this case. But even if I believed that the death penalty could be constitutionally imposed under certain circumstances, I would grant the petition and vacate petitioner’s death sentence for the reasons I expressed in McKenzie v. Montana, 449 U. S. 1050 (1980) (Marshall, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari).


text:
    No. 88-5281.
    Williams v. Barwick.
   C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari before judgment denied.


text:
    No. 88-5315.
    Wilson v. Illinois.
   Sup. Ct. 111. Certiorari denied.

Justice Marshall,

with whom

Justice Brennan joins, dissenting.

For the reasons stated in Lego v. Illinois, post this page (Marshall, J., dissenting), I would grant the petition in order to resolve the question whether a state court, when recognizing a new federal constitutional rule governing criminal procedure, is bound by the retroactivity principles fashioned by this Court, and if so, whether the principle of retroactivity announced in Griffith v. Kentucky, 479 U. S. 314 (1987), applies to a state-court decision recognizing such a rule, notwithstanding the state court’s preGñ'iffith determination that, under the retroactivity decisions of this Court then in force, the new rule would be given prospective application only. I dissent.