text:
User talk:Joe n bloe~enwikibooks

Hello, and welcome to Wikibooks!

Here are some tips to help you get started:
 * To learn the wiki-markup-language syntax, see Help:Editing.
 * You should sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~
 * There is a box at the top of the edit window that will insert this, too; it looks like part of a signature.
 * Remember to conduct any editing experiments in the sandbox.
 * You can tell the community something about yourself in your userpage.
 * You can get to this page by clicking the tab at the top of the page labeled with your registered username.
 * If you are a Wikipedian, see Wikibooks for Wikipedians for a primer on how things work here (it's a little different).
 * If you want to base your work here on materials from Wikipedia, please use WB:RFI (requests for importation) to bring the material over in compliance with the GFDL.
 * If you're an instructor and plan on using Wikibooks for a class project, see Guidelines for class projects
 * Please say hello at the Staff Lounge with any questions or ideas.
 * Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
 * Please take a look at Naming policy before starting a new book.
 * Remember to maintain a Neutral point of view.
 * Explore, be bold in editing pages, and have fun!

You will find more resources in Community Portal. If you want to ask a question, visit the Study help desk, the Staff lounge, IRC channel or ask me personally on my talk page. For site news, see the Bulletin board. It might be a good idea to add this page to your "watchlist" so that you can see when any new information is posted there. You can do that by clicking the tab labeled "watch" at the top of the page.

Good luck! -- Herby talk thyme 16:00, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Joe n bloe. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Joe n bloe~enwikibooks that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:17, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 05:05, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Joe n bloe~enwikibooks


text:
User talk:213.42.21.54

Thanks for experimenting with Wikibooks. Your test worked, and has now been removed. Please use Sandbox for any other tests you want to do, since testing material in modules will normally be removed quickly. Please see the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our project. Thanks. -- Herby talk thyme 16:04, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: User talk:213.42.21.54


text:
Ada Programming/Platform/POSIX

POSIX.5 is an IEEE (IEEE Standard 1003.5b-1996) and ISO (ISO/IEC 14519:2001) standard  defining an Ada interface to the POSIX system calls. The scope for the standard is the same as in POSIX.1 (C API) but defines a thick binding for the interface, thus benefiting from Ada features. Some functionality provided by POSIX.1, but already present in Ada, is skipped.

There exists an open-source implementation for GNAT called Florist (Florida State University/Forest), originally written by the Florida State University and eventually maintained by AdaCore.

The following compilers are known to provide an implementation of the standard: ObjectAda for Linux, GNAT , MAXAda and PowerAda. There is an implementation for GNAT over Windows called wPOSIX (formerly Win32POSIX).

Florist links

 * Author      : Formerly Florida State University, now Adacore

wPOSIX links

 * Author      : Pascal Obry and AdaCore.

Standards

 * ISO catalogue
 * IEEE Standards Description

Tutorial

 * POSIX in Ada — Appendix to “Understanding Unix/Linux Programming”. Includes complete examples.

ISO Working Group

 * The ISO standard was considered for revision in 2006 . A list of POSIX functions (including XSI functions, also known as SysV IPC) not currently supported by the Ada standard was identified as possible expansion.
 * In 2013, the working group states that the update effort has been cancelled due to low adoption.

Historical and background information

 * Ada POSIX binding. A focused Ada investigation — NASA Technical Report.
 * Available Ada Bindings - POSIX
 * A Prototype Implementation of the POSIX/Ada Realtime Extension
 * POSIX.5b Validation Test Suite

|POSIX.5

title: Ada Programming/Platform/POSIX


text:
User talk:216.129.98.144

Thanks for experimenting with Wikibooks. Your test worked, and has now been removed. Please use Sandbox for any other tests you want to do, since testing material in modules will normally be removed quickly. Please see the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our project. Thanks. -- Herby talk thyme 16:50, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

title: User talk:216.129.98.144


text:
User talk:Benzvi

Hello Benzvi, welcome to wikibooks! I saw that you created what looks like an outline for a new hebrew book on the nominations page. This wasn't the correct place to create it, so I took the liberty of creating a new book for you: Learn Hebrew. You can create your book here. I might also want to interest you in our existing Hebrew book, which might interest you.

Please let me know if you need any help. --Whiteknight (talk) (projects) 16:56, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

title: User talk:Benzvi


text:
Aspies Book/Chatting online - possible disturbances

Introduction
Chatting is communicating with other people by sending them text messages. This chapter presents various methods and strategies for avoiding negative thoughts and confusion in a chatroom, when encountering hurtful conversations. Below are analyzed in detail problems that may occur, and the many methods of their solution.

You may not actually intend some of these responses, but they will help up to a degree.

Chatroom abuse
This happens when a person sends you an abusive message in the chatroom.

Abuse them too
Reply in the chatroom by sending them an insulting message back.

 * Good consequences
 * You might feel better by insulting the other person in return.
 * The public may realize you didn't like the insulting message.
 * Bad consequences
 * You are wasting time on chatting with a person that insulted you.

Reply to them once
Reply them with a private message: "I'm sorry, I can't concentrate on what you say today. I will filter your messages for the good of both of us to prevent misunderstanding, and I'm looking forward to talk to you another day"

sidenote: Good and Bad sections not analyzed yet

Send a private message
Send them a private message "I found your message abusive their_nickname_here. Was your intention to type an abusive message?"

Possible responses

 * Yes
 * Then don't send them a message again, regardless of what they do, and you should technically ignore them.
 * No
 * You can send them back "ok".
 * If they say "no" for a second time
 * Send to this person in a private message: "I'm sorry. I think we are misinterpreting each other today. I can't concentrate on what you say to me, so I will filter out your messages for the good of both of us"
 * They don't send you a "yes" or "no" message
 * Then send them a private message: "I'm sorry. I think we are misinterpreting each other today. I can't concentrate on what you say to me, so I will filter out your messages for the good of both of us"

Standard responses
Whether these responses are sent in the chatroom or privately is not covered in this section, but only responses are covered.

The purpose of this section is to define what to reply for various occasions that might happen. For example, each time you feel abused by a message you might type something standard like "I have not abused you, and even you by trying to abuse me, I will not fall for your wish to reply back and start a flame war. I can keep my self control instead of wasting time by doing such a thing"

Short disturbed response
I'm sorry I can't reply any more to your messages.

Guidelines
This section was originally made in the case that you were having a bad mood in the chatroom. Further on this section was made as an idea of showing a certain set of rules to a person. Asking if a certain person agrees to them and if not certain actions might be taken by you. note: this is not just for others. You might also state publicly that you follow a certain guideline, because of your current mood. This can help others understand how you feel, or close to how you feel...and knowing that you tell about it publicly might make you feel more calm.

An example: This might confuse, but you might state for example just when you enter the chatroom that you are not in great mood, and you would like to chat calmly, or only through private chat messages.

Guidelines for personal use
These are guidelines that people might not need to view, and might just be aware of that you follow certain guidelines that regulate your behaviour. (yes, you can regulate yourself by these)

Communicating in private with friends
The following described under "content:..." is information about this specific guideline

content: I'm in no good mood, and I will not take part in the discussion in the chatroom, but only send messages to people I already know, and if I find none, then as of this rule I will still not type any message in the chatroom.

Guidelines for public use
I will also use a new term called "ruleset", although I can't describe it yet since my thoughts are very abstract. The purpose of the section is to type about guidelines that other people will view including you.

ruleset1 confusion prevention (complex)
First the reason for this ruleset, is that it's expected you are confused while at the chatroom. Since you are confused, you might wish to avoid messages that confuse you, and you might want a balance where all messages that confuse you are filtered out. That's what this ruleset is about.

 * 1) Will not reply to things that confuse you
 * 2) Example: Someone says "oh yeah" and you can not or do not wish to get involved in the discussion that gave this response from a certain person. So you will ignore that message.
 * 3) If opinions confuse you, or make you ponder which you don't want to do according to this ruleset, you might filter it out, but only after you've noted 3 confusing things from a certain person.
 * 4) example: person A says at 3 different times "lalala hoho" and "they should not be allowed to do that" and "yehhh, oops", and let's say that these 3 message confused you, then you filter the nickname out.


text:
Talk:Aspies Book/Chatting online - possible disturbances

Section on why I created this and named it X

 * reason I created this section: Many people have left both forums and the chatrooms for a very long time because they've had bad experiences. So I made this section to analyze what are the problems, and type about solutions.
 * reason I named it X: I'm not yet sure to what chapter it will belong, or if it will belong. Logictheo 18:43, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

A problem solving technique
Hi! I'm not an aspie but I would still like to contribute this little problem-solving technique that might be useful:

Whenever someone says or does something that you perceive as hurtful, do this:

1. Identify what you perceived as hurtful and tell it to the person responsible for the hurtful remark or action (eg. "That was a hurtful thing to say").

2. Tell that person how the remark makes YOU feel (eg. "It makes me sad to hear that").

3. Ask the person to clarify what he or she means and what intent he or she had (eg. "What did you mean by that?" and "Did you really mean to hurt me?").

It is mostly helpful to try to respond in a positive or humourous way, thereby disarming the situation and getting an upper hand on the other person. A conversation example:

Person 1: You suck big time at X!

Person 2: ''Ough! That hurts man! Someone please remove this dagger out of my chest! Do you really mean to be this evil?''

Note that Person 2 did all the steps described above. If joking doesnt make the person stop, you might have to explain things in a more serious manner, eg:

''Saying things like that hurts people. Now I am a bit sad because you said that. Is that what you intended to?''

There are a number of outcomes when you respond like this:

1. You have misunderstood the remark and the other person tells you this.

2. The other person apologize.

3. The other person tries to re-explain the remark in a more positive light because he/she understands that the remark was perceived as hurtful by you.

4. The other person continues the abuse. If this happens, discontinue the conversation because it's not worth your time or energy.

Hope this is helpful! --194.103.205.27 (talk) 05:53, 7 June 2009 (UTC)