text: User talk:Lworcel

title: User talk:Lworcel


text: User talk:Iulian ionita

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: User talk:Iulian ionita


text: User talk:Trần Văn Thiện

title: User talk:Trần Văn Thiện


text: User talk:James ramphal

title: User talk:James ramphal


text: User talk:Ed Noyes

title: User talk:Ed Noyes


text: User talk:Mikeajgard

title: User talk:Mikeajgard


text: User talk:Alexandru117

title: User talk:Alexandru117


text: User talk:Kyucasio

title: User talk:Kyucasio


text: User talk:Egm6341.s11.team4.fields

title: User talk:Egm6341.s11.team4.fields


text: User talk:Jghg007

title: User talk:Jghg007


text: User talk:CBuiltother

title: User talk:CBuiltother


text: User talk:LoskiEtxailabara

title: User talk:LoskiEtxailabara


text: User talk:Polete 98

title: User talk:Polete 98


text: User talk:Moounir68

title: User talk:Moounir68


text: User talk:Satvik batra

title: User talk:Satvik batra


text: User talk:T0d0kex13

title: User talk:T0d0kex13


text: User talk:Petropetro

title: User talk:Petropetro


text: User talk:Rabbitt03

title: User talk:Rabbitt03


text: User talk:Myworld3000

title: User talk:Myworld3000


text: User talk:Habibieamrullah

title: User talk:Habibieamrullah


text:
Category:Australian Capital Territory

de:Kategorie:Australian Capital Territory

title: Category:Australian Capital Territory


text: User talk:Mehmet2046

title: User talk:Mehmet2046


text: User talk:BuanBuan

title: User talk:BuanBuan


text: User talk:Paul20112011

title: User talk:Paul20112011


text: User talk:Keiomae

title: User talk:Keiomae


text: User talk:Phat dahani khan

title: User talk:Phat dahani khan


text: User talk:Pau-jek

title: User talk:Pau-jek


text: User talk:Dogsjdwm

title: User talk:Dogsjdwm


text: User talk:K3BACON

title: User talk:K3BACON


text: User talk:Lebnene ana

title: User talk:Lebnene ana


text: User talk:Udhipurnomo

title: User talk:Udhipurnomo


text: User talk:Issambasheer

title: User talk:Issambasheer


text: User talk:MarNeu

title: User talk:MarNeu


text: User talk:Editor avril

title: User talk:Editor avril


text: User talk:Joseph Jude

title: User talk:Joseph Jude


text: User talk:Lenin's Victory

title: User talk:Lenin's Victory


text: User talk:Varun0079

title: User talk:Varun0079


text: User talk:M.wernicke

title: User talk:M.wernicke


text: User talk:Rameejraja

title: User talk:Rameejraja


text: User talk:Antonbarraña

title: User talk:Antonbarraña


text: User talk:Nevermind99

title: User talk:Nevermind99


text: User talk:SteGrifo

title: User talk:SteGrifo


text: User talk:PaulShulick

title: User talk:PaulShulick


text: User talk:Marcalex24

title: User talk:Marcalex24


text: User talk:Geekguy12

title: User talk:Geekguy12


text: User talk:Skrz

title: User talk:Skrz


text: User talk:Cristhian.9876

title: User talk:Cristhian.9876


text: User talk:Gatyh10

title: User talk:Gatyh10


text: User talk:Mattiscoolhaha

title: User talk:Mattiscoolhaha


text: User talk:Pranav21391

title: User talk:Pranav21391


text: User talk:Mkdrb

title: User talk:Mkdrb


text: User talk:Crabesque

title: User talk:Crabesque


text: User talk:AHGEpro

title: User talk:AHGEpro


text: User talk:Woodhaul

title: User talk:Woodhaul


text: Category:Tasmania

title: Category:Tasmania


text: User talk:Katsjkdlfa;d

title: User talk:Katsjkdlfa;d


text: User talk:Jennifer.paxton

title: User talk:Jennifer.paxton


text: User talk:Ilogiczz

title: User talk:Ilogiczz


text: User talk:GULSHAN.K.KHATTAR

title: User talk:GULSHAN.K.KHATTAR


text: User talk:Streles217

title: User talk:Streles217


text: User talk:TheOnlyQueen

title: User talk:TheOnlyQueen


text: User talk:Nemets79

title: User talk:Nemets79


text: User talk:Rijiol8

title: User talk:Rijiol8


text: User talk:Aguatierra16

title: User talk:Aguatierra16


text: User talk:DoctorPestis

title: User talk:DoctorPestis


text: User talk:Oscaracso123

title: User talk:Oscaracso123


text: User talk:Unless 68

title: User talk:Unless 68


text: User talk:JurandirPedia

title: User talk:JurandirPedia


text: User talk:Asrarkaiser

title: User talk:Asrarkaiser


text: User talk:Rnuova

title: User talk:Rnuova


text: User talk:Mithileshbaraily

title: User talk:Mithileshbaraily


text:
Thread:Comments:Premier of Tasmania, David Bartlett, resigns/Comments from feedback form - "Good Job!"

Good Job!


text: User talk:Frpasala.anthony

title: User talk:Frpasala.anthony


text: User talk:Leo The Fox

title: User talk:Leo The Fox


text: User talk:Marlenefine

title: User talk:Marlenefine


text: User talk:Booboa

title: User talk:Booboa


text: Comments:Over 400 attend Scottish singer-songwriter Gerry Rafferty's funeral


text: User talk:Alexbrewer

title: User talk:Alexbrewer


text: User talk:Bbcmpm

title: User talk:Bbcmpm


text:
Wikinews:Requests for permissions/Removal/Diego Grez (sysop)

Diego Grez
Closed - Rights retained, speedied per Brian McNeil's suggestion. Not enough weight to warrant a desysop at this time. BarkingFish (talk) 18:37, 26 January 2011 (UTC) (closing admin voted in this RFP/R, second set of eyes welcomed)

[ Express your view on this user ] (comments) Nominated on

– I feel that Diego Grez is, at this time, not suitable for the administrator flag on the English-language version of Wikinews. There is not one singular reason why I feel this is the case, but rather several minor issues that add up to make a large problem. N.B.: As a non-administrator, the contents of the deleted pages are based on what I was told on IRC; they may be completely wrong.
 * Deletion
 * The deletion summary of Duoderry (a spam article), was simply 'NO!'. This is unacceptable: the delete-reason dropdown exists for a reason. It would have been far more appropriate to pick 'Advertising/spam' from the combo box and leave the additional fields blank.
 * The deletion summary of Talk:Bfvmmgmvbmgh was also inappropriate: insulting a user is unacceptable, and in direct contravention of What Wikinews is not.
 * Bhagat Mahasabha's summary of 'Bye' was inappropriate -- as a press release, using the combo box would have been more appropriate. Falkland Islands announce they are 'satisfied' with their defence also was sent off with a farewell. That particular article was tagged 'abandoned', yet deleted within a day, again in contravention of our deletion policy (that states three days, although the sources were well out of date).
 * The deletion summary of Nate's Birthday was extremely inappropriate. 'Fuck off' is never an acceptable summary for anything, especially not a press release of, I am told, a charity event, issued in good faith by someone who is unfamiliar with our ruleset.
 * Democracy Now! – now under a Creative Commons license was told to '[g]et back to where you once belonged' (granted, with an appropriate drop-down).
 * Odisha,india has a rather condescending deletion summary.
 * OWN was 'OWNED'. Regardless of the topic of the deletion, it's not helpful to start screaming memes at people.
 * Comments:Lady Gaga has a pointless deletion summary.
 * File talk:Information.svg is a completely inappropriate edit summary which should never have happened. The former WMF Legal Counsel says hi.
 * Art exhibition announcement: sending any article to 'hell' isn't encouraged either.

 * Blocking
 * Irate was blocked indefinitely with a rather unhelpful block summary. Blocking a user can be confusing for the recipient; being told that they were blocked for not being a plane is inappropriate, regardless of how justified the block was -- telling the user that they were being blocked as a sockmaster would have been more appropriate.
 * Blocking ངག་དབང་བསོད་ནམས། is particularly aggravating. Telling a user that the language they speak is one that 'nobody knows' is rather bad form. Would you like it if I turned round and said "I don't speak Spanish. Why should I? Nobody knows it.". Considering Diego Grez's penchance for using the wrong language in edit summaries, rendering it incomprehensible to 93% of the world's population.

 * Protection
 * Protection summaries are fine -- but a few have no edit summaries, and others have summaries in the wrong language.

*Diego gave BarkingFish's review bit back unilaterally against consensus and against the user's wishes. '''Removed. Don't drag me into this. It was dealt with.'''
 * Rights
 * Edits
 * A request for deletion was closed today with the edit summary of 'fuck off': inappropriate, not only for the expletive, but for the fact that the corresponding request was closed after two days with only one vote.

For what it's worth, Diego is a good content writer, and this shows pretty good mediation skills. But I do not feel that Diego is suited for the rôle overall. — μ 22:08, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Perhaps I was overzealous with my desysop proposal: having trawled through 2,800 of Diego’s edits, I can find little in the way of evidence for why Diego should be desysopped (the few examples, to my discredit, are too long ago to have any freelance). I have no idea if I had completely misjudged Diego’s edits when they were first made & later found that they were completely benign; or whether the edits are concealed in talk pages of stale articles (of the ‘what do you mean my article has fallen off the review queue’ variety; I’m speculating). Regardless, it appears evident that the desysop proposal as it stands lacks water. I honestly thought that it would be a rather trivial task to find diffs for what I thought was a major problem (various ‘rants’ [if you forgive the POV word], such as the one below, unbecoming of an administrator).
 * Addendum

I feel quite uncomfortable with the allegations that Diego makes below. I haven’t tried to deliberately disrupt the project -- I honestly thought I was saying what needed to be said, echoing other user’s opinions. As for the idea of me stalking him: all I did was trawl through the logs, something I do for many requests for adminship, and something I’d regard as standard protocol. To follow up the diff directly linked to in his comment, I had learned from my awful, embarrassing immature RfA at English Wikipedia in 2007 that adminship isn’t an entitlement, nor a reward. People who constantly request adminship perhaps don’t understand the meaning of the word. With regards to adminship, a bit of a Catch-22 comes into play people who want power certainly aren’t suited to it. I’ve had experience with users that have made obscene numbers of RfAs; I was basing my oppose on the candidate as it stood, not as the candidate until the end of time. My sentiment was perhaps faintly echoed by Tempo’s oppose.

As for Pitsilemu, I was annoyed with the bot. It wasn’t just me; other users in the channel were finding it annoying. Irrespective of that, I do not have operator privileges on #wikinews, and so I feel that it is unfair to pin the eventual +q mode assignment on me. As for the ‘since January’ comment, it’s a logical fallacy.

In response to Amgine’s comment that I withdraw the request: as much as I may wish to, I do not feel that I am in a position to do so, for the same reason I dislike people that ‘withdraw their nomination’ on deletion requests -- I have nothing against the candidate no longer wishing to stand for adminship (as without the user consent, adminship cannot take place), but once a discussion begins for almost anything else, it is not a single user’s place to determine the outcome of a discussion, nor to cut the discussion short, simply because they happened to be the one to initiate it. With regards to the Spanish language comment, I feel bound to state that I have edited the above nomination from 98% to 93% after the comment was made -- it was a simple typo (8 and 3 look very similar). Regardless, the point still stands -- Spanish shouldn’t be used on an English-language wiki when communication is paramount. (In a pointless deviation, I only added the statistic to add flavour; for comparison, English is approximately spoken by 11% of the world population, and about 27% of the Internet [Spanish is 36%].) — μ 12:29, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

General comments
Requests for removal for this user:
 * Links for Diego Grez:

''Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review his contributions before commenting. Unhelpful comments or votes may be removed at any time.''

Discussion

 * It was funny to me to read this. It really seems that this guy has been, stalking what I do. Yes, most times I don't say things right, but I never do it with a bad intention, but Microchip seems to not have a sense of humor, as far as I see. The nomination seems to be a huge w:WP:IDONTLIKEIT, in the sense that Microchip never EVER wanted me to be a sysop. If the community considers that I don't have to be a sysop anymore, that's okay, it's not the end of the world to me and I have better things to do in my real life, but this has just confirmed to me that certain person here is not really well-intentioned. They even got annoyed (poor him) about an innocent bot who only said a "lol" after a "heh" they did on IRC. It's good to note the bot had been from, say, January in the #wikinews channel, until they made it rest in peace. Is that good? No, I don't think so. Bad... bad... bad. That's all, three-four, over and out. Diego Grez return fire 22:29, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Respectfully, attacking the person making allegations instead of the allegations themselves, doesn't really look very good imho. Bawolff ☺☻ 00:12, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Clarifying:
 * None of the comments I did in the deletion reasons were made with bad intention, I did them 'joking', and nobody had said anything about it until now. Why?.
 * When I gave BarkingFish his reviewer right back, I swear I did it because he's a good person, and I did not expect he would be reluctant to that, my fault, yes.
 * --Comment, don't worry about it, Diego. I know you did it with the best intentions, I just wasn't ready for it considering the reason I surrendered it in the first place. A nice thought, appreciated, just the wrong time. Don't blame yourself for it.  It was resolved, end of. BarkingFish (talk) 05:15, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
 * His "Considering Diego Grez's penchance for using the wrong language in edit summaries, rendering it incomprehensible to 98% of the world's population." statement is completely wrong. Spanish is the third most spoken language in the world, and way more than just a 2 per cent of the people speaks it.
 * Is not using the default summaries for deletion, or protection wrong now? Why can't I have the freedom to say whatever but, anyway the deletion/protection is justified, don't you think?
 * Diego Grez return fire 00:24, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

 * Some of the arguments presented above have merit. The vast majority do not. Some are as callous and inaccurate as those attributed to Diego Grez (e.g. the 93% comment, citation List of languages by number of native speakers.) But, fundamentally, not one nor the combined collection amount to a de-sysop justification. And not one effort, so far as I have seen, was made to alleviate the issues raised prior to this request. De-admining should not be the first action taken; it should always be the last after all other possible avenues (including ArbCom) have been exhausted. The request, imo, appears more disruptive than the issue it purports to resolve. I assume it was made in good faith, but I would encourage the nominator to withdraw it as I feel it is both divisive and unlikely to pass with the necessary majority. -  Amgine | t 05:11, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note my remarks further down about preliminary discussion before nominations for removal of access. I don't agree that de-sysop should systematically go to Arbcom before it comes here, but here definitely shouldn't be where it comes first; we need explicit words on the removal sections, about preliminary discussion between prospective nominator and nominee.  Without explicit guidance, the mistake of sudden nom for removal is way too easy to fall into.  --Pi zero (talk) 06:43, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I think a large part of the problem is we don't have sufficient dispute resolution infrastructure. Dispute resolution hasn't been used successfully in a very long time. Bawolff ☺☻ 06:47, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The label "dispute resolution" is a problem in itself. What is wanted is not limited in scope to what happens after a dispute already exists.  --Pi zero (talk) 07:03, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

 * presents the log of constructive usage of the sysop rights by DiegoGrez. Again, I have to say it one more time - the concerns raised are serious, but quite similar and not major; just leaving a note at the talk page should be enough for this case. Gryllida 08:22, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Re Microchip's addendum to the nomination:
 * There would have been multiple advantages to discussing these matters with Diego before nominating (or, for that matter, asking someone else to do so if you felt Diego would take it better from someone else). Downstream, by the time of nomination the discussion might already be well established on an all-around respectful footing.  Up-front, your concerns would be given a more thorough vetting beforehand, either resolving them without the need for a nomination, or giving them more focused and refined substance with which to move forward.  So the nomination, if it happened at all, would run more smoothly.  I learned the "discuss first" lesson the hard way myself, hence my frustration that the removal request sections fail to pass on that lesson, and people just keep having to relearn it for themselves (as I did, and you are doing).

 * I've had the impression myself in recent... months?... that Diego has gotten somewhat over-casual in his approach to the tools. They're serious things, after all, and a deadpan delivery is never out of place (whereas joking, swearing, or some combination of the two in one's summaries can easily go awry; it's not dissimilar to the cliched observation that everyone looks good in uniform).  I've gotten the impression, a time or two, that Diego was a bit on the high-handed side when reviewing requests for unblock, too; it seems simply asking once isn't grounds to block ability to edit xyr talk page, no matter how obnoxious xe might have been to incur the block in the first place.  If (as I think I remember) I saw such an incident going by, of course I should have remarked on it to Diego at the time... though I probably hesitated because I dislike leaving notes of criticism on people's talk pages, which is always difficult to do tactfully and usually creates tension if not annoyed retorts.  My sense is, come to think, that the most concerning thing in Diego's recent attitude has been his reaction to criticism, of which his initial reaction to this nomination is suggestive.

 * But all that is only vague impressions on my part — and in any case, even if all those impressions were dead accurate and backed up by diffs, they wouldn't rise to the level of a de-sysop nom. They would rise to the level of a constructive-criticism note on Diego's talk page, though.  --Pi zero (talk) 14:55, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) (removal of rights): The diffs speak for themselves. Sorry Diego, you're an excellent writer and editor, but perhaps a little immature for adminship at the moment. Δεν δοδγε  t\c 22:34, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) I'm sorry Diego, but Dendodge and MC8 bring up good points. Being an admin does require a level of maturity (you are, after all, role models to the community) and that hasn't been displayed by your actions. Sorry, ~YTT T 22:39, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) Noting the user's reply. Has been a good article writer in the past, and we all acknowledge that I think; but valid criticism, even if over the top and harshly phrased, should be taken on board calmly. --Killing Vector (talk) 22:42, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) . DiegoGrez has not been warned about the inappropriate summaries and other (quite similar) concerns at his talk page; those concerns are not excessively disruptive to the project. I think he understands his error and will do it right; just a warning as been given here would be enough in this case. Gryllida 22:47, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
 * It's just disruption from that certain person... don't they have anything else to do? Ah, right, it's winter over there... Diego Grez return fire 22:54, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Desysop for failure to use the dropdown box?! Would you care to advise me of the policy requiring edit summaries? The policy requiring use of the dropdown? I don't remember supporting them.  Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 07:43, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Concerns aren't complete phantoms, but don't rise to the level of dy-sysop (per my comments above).  --Pi zero (talk) 15:01, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) Agree with Amgine and Pi Zero. Bawolff ☺☻ 17:36, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) I agree with Pi Zero.  There are a couple of concerns, but nothing which in any way warrants Diego to have his administrative rights withdrawn.  For what its worth, I don't appreciate a private matter which was nobody else's concern but mine and Diego's being used as a reason to desysop him.  That was resolved entirely, he apologised for it, end of.  Don't drag my issues into your problems, Microchip. BarkingFish (talk) 13:33, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) There's no compelling reason to desysop him. Diego may sometimes act a little ... hostile, but he can keep himself in check and knows what to avoid.  — fetch · comms   16:35, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
 * and strongly suggest this be speedily closed and archived. The weak argument in favour of this discussion/poll seems to have involved a far more significant amount of effort than many people's article contributions. Now, get back to work! --Brian McNeil / talk 07:49, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Neutral

 * 1) Yes, those aren't things we would like to see in Wikinews and I definitely would not condone this behaviour but Diego is an exceptional author, mediator and reviewer. He is active as an admin and performs time-consuming tasks (some of which others wouldn't like to do) such as dealing with spam. ~YTT T 22:22, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
 * According to the deletion logs, the phrase "spam" appears in his summaries fifteen times: in my mind, not enough to warrant keeping the bit in its own right. Anyone can edit, and any reviewer can review. One does not have to be an administrator to do so. — μ 22:36, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Comment
I am opposed to deadmining for anyone but inactive users. We have arbcom for a reason after all. Arbcom's remit includes de-admins as they are always controversial and are normally resulting out of a community depute - hence why we introduced arbcom. I feel that that body is the way to go. Community filed deadmins should not exist. Brian | (Talk) | New Zealand Portal 23:04, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Removal noms do not necessarily arise from community disputes — though they tend to cause them, about which I'll say more below. Limiting de-admin actions to Arbcom places the bar for such actions much too high, and, to my mind, abuses the Arbcom device.  Arbcom should be exclusively a last resort: there should not be any broad class of problem for which Arbcom is the only recourse.

 * That said, we should develop recommendations to make removal noms go more smoothly. To be placed at the top of the removals sections here and at FR/RFP.  Prior to nomination, the nominator should seek to maturely discuss the substance of the nomination with the nominee on the nominee's talk page.  It's not properly "dispute resolution", because there might not be any dispute (beforehand), and resolution, though pleasant were it to happen, isn't the point.  The point is that, for the good of the community, all sides of a removal nomination should conduct a mature discussion throughout, and that means beginning as we mean to go on, with a mature dialog.  --Pi zero (talk) 03:31, 24 January 2011 (UTC)


text: User talk:Sugarspicebettie

title: User talk:Sugarspicebettie


text: User talk:Waloo44

title: User talk:Waloo44


text: User talk:Stribny

title: User talk:Stribny


text: User talk:Interpol-internet-police

title: User talk:Interpol-internet-police


text: User talk:Mari sofi 980514

title: User talk:Mari sofi 980514


text: User talk:Tinahenson

title: User talk:Tinahenson


text: User talk:Dquen001

title: User talk:Dquen001


text: User talk:Ourownstudio

title: User talk:Ourownstudio


text: User talk:Thiago Attianesi

title: User talk:Thiago Attianesi


text: User talk:Biggestloserclub

title: User talk:Biggestloserclub


text: User talk:Rahuthehot

title: User talk:Rahuthehot


text: User talk:Robcabico

title: User talk:Robcabico


text: User talk:Mattg774

title: User talk:Mattg774


text: User talk:GuySone

title: User talk:GuySone


text: User talk:Adekhel

title: User talk:Adekhel


text: User talk:Dillydolly

title: User talk:Dillydolly


text: User talk:Mukhilravi

title: User talk:Mukhilravi


text: User talk:Ananecicoelho

title: User talk:Ananecicoelho


text: User talk:Nicholas.malinadams

title: User talk:Nicholas.malinadams


text: User talk:Mnmav

title: User talk:Mnmav


text: User talk:Beleh2431

title: User talk:Beleh2431


text: User talk:Garnet6

title: User talk:Garnet6


text: User talk:Örsveçekiç

title: User talk:Örsveçekiç


text: User talk:Hasteur

title: User talk:Hasteur


text: User talk:Papageno0

title: User talk:Papageno0


text: User talk:NumberUno

title: User talk:NumberUno


text: User talk:Michaelturner241

title: User talk:Michaelturner241


text: User talk:Roberto Landwehr

title: User talk:Roberto Landwehr


text: User talk:Lilacness

title: User talk:Lilacness


text: User talk:Topharma

title: User talk:Topharma


text: User talk:Kumar 0586

title: User talk:Kumar 0586


text:
Template:RfP/editintro/crat

To add a nomination: === — bureaucratship ===
 * Put the new nomination just below the "just below this line" comment.
 * Suggested format (remember, this message will disappear the first time you click "preview"):

NOMINATING COMMENT HERE --  NOMINATOR'S SIGNATURE WITH TIMESTAMP

title: Template:RfP/editintro/crat


text: User talk:Sina soly25

title: User talk:Sina soly25


text: User talk:Jackacole

title: User talk:Jackacole


text: User talk:Mediaphyte

title: User talk:Mediaphyte


text: User talk:Dhave209 NJITWILL

title: User talk:Dhave209 NJITWILL


text: User talk:弦楽五重奏

title: User talk:弦楽五重奏


text: User talk:Rednal96

title: User talk:Rednal96


text: User talk:Ackem19

title: User talk:Ackem19


text: User talk:Arvfurniture

title: User talk:Arvfurniture


text: User talk:Johnny topia

title: User talk:Johnny topia


text: User talk:MIN Semampir

title: User talk:MIN Semampir


text: User talk:Piero citraro

title: User talk:Piero citraro


text:
User talk:Minnugent

--Pi zero (talk) 03:40, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Minnugent


text: User talk:Delsol7

title: User talk:Delsol7


text:
Comments:Canadian government falls in non-confidence vote

Comments from feedback form - "Since wikipedia can be edited ..."
Since wikipedia can be edited by anyone who is willing to spend the time, I do not believe that it is very reliable and I usually cannot backup the information with any other website. It would be very useful to include a list of sites talking about the same thing thank you —68.146.14.237 (talk) 02:38, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

 * Wikinews is not Wikipedia. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 07:47, 24 January 2011 (UTC)


text: User talk:Jboschee

title: User talk:Jboschee


text: User talk:Fdl3-NJITWILL

title: User talk:Fdl3-NJITWILL


text: User talk:Powercurve123

title: User talk:Powercurve123


text: User talk:Nguyen chi tan

title: User talk:Nguyen chi tan


text: User talk:Bobby bola

title: User talk:Bobby bola


text: User talk:Xjuliox0

title: User talk:Xjuliox0


text: User talk:Lawblogger18

title: User talk:Lawblogger18


text: User talk:Es.ntp

title: User talk:Es.ntp


text: User talk:RomulusIIRemus

title: User talk:RomulusIIRemus


text: User talk:Hgulbahce

title: User talk:Hgulbahce


text: User talk:Msanand

title: User talk:Msanand


text: User talk:Leeferd

title: User talk:Leeferd


text: User talk:Jswuhang

title: User talk:Jswuhang


text: User talk:Bhargavk04

title: User talk:Bhargavk04


text: User talk:RamiltonWang

title: User talk:RamiltonWang


text: User talk:Deepthi Karnam

title: User talk:Deepthi Karnam


text: User talk:Adhitiya

title: User talk:Adhitiya


text: User talk:Innoverdrive

title: User talk:Innoverdrive


text: User talk:Kosmicdance

title: User talk:Kosmicdance


text: User talk:Maddy545

title: User talk:Maddy545


text: User talk:Minhgurluver

title: User talk:Minhgurluver


text: User talk:Cigalle47

title: User talk:Cigalle47


text: User talk:Emanuelbaez

title: User talk:Emanuelbaez


text: User talk:Uhsnahbiv

title: User talk:Uhsnahbiv


text: User talk:Freywa

title: User talk:Freywa


text: User talk:Bdotson2012

title: User talk:Bdotson2012


text: User talk:Ethoka

title: User talk:Ethoka


text: User talk:Ilotien

title: User talk:Ilotien


text: User talk:Albertmansuper1234

title: User talk:Albertmansuper1234


text: User talk:Wil-m

title: User talk:Wil-m


text: User talk:Delectorskaya

title: User talk:Delectorskaya


text: User talk:Ranmalprasad

title: User talk:Ranmalprasad


text: User talk:Pgianni

title: User talk:Pgianni


text: User talk:Kethryvis

title: User talk:Kethryvis


text:
User:Kethryvis

The Disclaimer
I am a Community Associate for the Wikimedia Foundation, though my work on this username is in my capacity as a volunteer. My work with the Foundation began officially on October 15, 2010. Unless otherwise stated, any edit to this wiki by me is an act of a regular member of the community, not a legal or official action of any part of the Wikimedia Foundation. Official acts by me in the line of my work will be done from my office account, User:Christine_(WMF).

You can find me on IRC under the nick ChristineM.

The Other Stuff
I don't edit a lot, I mainly edit on English Wikipedia mainly around The Muppets and other Muppet Related Things. I'd like to get more involved with editing as time allows between work and grad school. They'll mostly be small edits and hopefully nothing to get excited over but hey... ya gotta start somewhere, right?

title: User:Kethryvis


text: User talk:Bradloid07

title: User talk:Bradloid07


text: User talk:Khoshavist

title: User talk:Khoshavist


text: User talk:Meconium

title: User talk:Meconium


text: User talk:Joyyyy

title: User talk:Joyyyy


text: User talk:Daftruth

title: User talk:Daftruth


text: User talk:Mspok11

title: User talk:Mspok11


text: User talk:Almar D

title: User talk:Almar D


text: User talk:Zissis11

title: User talk:Zissis11


text: User talk:Yosef Tmaneak

title: User talk:Yosef Tmaneak


text: User talk:Stepanus David Kurniawan

title: User talk:Stepanus David Kurniawan


text: User talk:Jrp19901

title: User talk:Jrp19901


text: User talk:Tantanlove

title: User talk:Tantanlove


text: User talk:Ibpanhwer

title: User talk:Ibpanhwer


text: User talk:Sam alice sing

title: User talk:Sam alice sing


text: User talk:Ravi21176

title: User talk:Ravi21176


text: User talk:Gilknut

title: User talk:Gilknut


text: User talk:Mauritian1

title: User talk:Mauritian1


text: User talk:Munnambbs49

title: User talk:Munnambbs49


text: User talk:Elerea

title: User talk:Elerea


text: User talk:Kuyamarco123

title: User talk:Kuyamarco123


text: User talk:Alina.ingrid

title: User talk:Alina.ingrid


text: User talk:Tan Jun Hong

title: User talk:Tan Jun Hong


text:
User talk:Bernhard~enwikinews

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Bernhard. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Bernhard~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:14, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:29, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bernhard~enwikinews


text:
Thread:Comments:UK Jobcentre call centre staff on 48-hour strike/Good for them...

... finally someone is going on strike for an honest reason.


text: User talk:Vickygaud

title: User talk:Vickygaud


text: User talk:Simone2583

title: User talk:Simone2583


text: User talk:ALFREDO NOSEDA SCALE

title: User talk:ALFREDO NOSEDA SCALE


text: User talk:Firdousashi

title: User talk:Firdousashi


text: User talk:INOUE MINORU

title: User talk:INOUE MINORU


text: User talk:Aquarta

title: User talk:Aquarta


text: User talk:Ozzywazzy94

title: User talk:Ozzywazzy94


text: User talk:Narendra.jarugu

title: User talk:Narendra.jarugu


text: User talk:Nezha73

title: User talk:Nezha73


text: User talk:Nazivon

title: User talk:Nazivon


text: User talk:Orio43

title: User talk:Orio43


text: User talk:Shaaif

title: User talk:Shaaif


text: User talk:Needle23

title: User talk:Needle23


text: User talk:الهروبي2009

title: User talk:الهروبي2009


text: User talk:Ajdevil

title: User talk:Ajdevil


text: User talk:Prabhusatyaseelan

title: User talk:Prabhusatyaseelan


text: User talk:Tonny39

title: User talk:Tonny39


text: User talk:SoulShatter

title: User talk:SoulShatter


text: User talk:Niconner

title: User talk:Niconner


text: User talk:Kavaliotis

title: User talk:Kavaliotis


text: User talk:Ivica Cekić

title: User talk:Ivica Cekić


text: User talk:TENG.ZUO

title: User talk:TENG.ZUO


text: User talk:Avanu

title: User talk:Avanu


text: User talk:Aleχ

title: User talk:Aleχ


text: User talk:Ueliw0

title: User talk:Ueliw0


text: User talk:Isotrop

title: User talk:Isotrop


text: User talk:Rahul706

title: User talk:Rahul706


text: User talk:Sallyzhou29

title: User talk:Sallyzhou29


text: User talk:FRANELYA

title: User talk:FRANELYA


text: User talk:Ispanzul

title: User talk:Ispanzul


text: User talk:ER.ANURAG

title: User talk:ER.ANURAG


text: User talk:Najate.sarraf

title: User talk:Najate.sarraf


text: User talk:Rudigloder

title: User talk:Rudigloder


text: User talk:Nandhy

title: User talk:Nandhy


text: User talk:لاشة

title: User talk:لاشة


text: User talk:Macdud4

title: User talk:Macdud4


text: User talk:EPRCJunkie

title: User talk:EPRCJunkie


text: User talk:Ade irwan

title: User talk:Ade irwan


text: User talk:Liero1

title: User talk:Liero1


text: User talk:Whiskles

title: User talk:Whiskles


text: User talk:Praveenmeduri

title: User talk:Praveenmeduri


text: User talk:Swibbles

title: User talk:Swibbles


text: User talk:Osawa t

title: User talk:Osawa t


text: User talk:Robinsoncrusoe

title: User talk:Robinsoncrusoe


text: User talk:Azariahgh

title: User talk:Azariahgh


text: User talk:Alpermat

title: User talk:Alpermat


text: User talk:HuJintao

title: User talk:HuJintao


text: User talk:Lucycoeltown

title: User talk:Lucycoeltown


text: User talk:Deadv

title: User talk:Deadv


text: User talk:AlistairMcMillan

title: User talk:AlistairMcMillan


text:
User talk:Mann-guru

--Pi zero (talk) 15:11, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Hello,

Your recent contributions are considered to be spam and have been reverted or deleted. Should you believe that your contributions are not spam, please argue your case on your talk page, or in WN:ALERT.

Further spamming may result in your editing privileges being removed. Please contribute to Wikinews in a constructive fashion instead. Pi zero (talk) 17:05, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mann-guru


text: User talk:DaveBagler

title: User talk:DaveBagler


text: User talk:Rajarishisritheran

title: User talk:Rajarishisritheran


text: User talk:Vijayakumar Kalarickal

title: User talk:Vijayakumar Kalarickal


text: User talk:Blainec01

title: User talk:Blainec01


text: User talk:Dirairaia

title: User talk:Dirairaia


text: User talk:Keltawie

title: User talk:Keltawie


text: User talk:Николай Свичкарь

title: User talk:Николай Свичкарь


text: User talk:Pvila

title: User talk:Pvila


text: User talk:Harry John Venema

title: User talk:Harry John Venema


text: User talk:Parthidmk

title: User talk:Parthidmk


text: User talk:ZeamToo

title: User talk:ZeamToo


text:
User talk:Tileskitchen

--Pi zero (talk) 17:09, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tileskitchen


text: User talk:Hazemzahran

title: User talk:Hazemzahran


text: User talk:Tuanvo111

title: User talk:Tuanvo111


text: User talk:Jamiedwi

title: User talk:Jamiedwi


text: User talk:Artur Khachatryan

title: User talk:Artur Khachatryan


text: User talk:Caosi945

title: User talk:Caosi945


text: User talk:Jmndungu

title: User talk:Jmndungu


text: User talk:Rsowen

title: User talk:Rsowen


text: User talk:Inro45

title: User talk:Inro45


text: User talk:Dsu3

title: User talk:Dsu3


text: User talk:Jamesndanni

title: User talk:Jamesndanni


text: User talk:Letícia de Figueredo Alves

title: User talk:Letícia de Figueredo Alves


text: User talk:Gratedparmesan

title: User talk:Gratedparmesan


text: User talk:Kitchentiles

title: User talk:Kitchentiles


text: User talk:Cimmerian praetor

title: User talk:Cimmerian praetor


text: User talk:Ger01

title: User talk:Ger01


text: User talk:Dust4ever

title: User talk:Dust4ever


text: User talk:Jorda321

title: User talk:Jorda321


text: User talk:Coillusion

title: User talk:Coillusion


text: User talk:Laidani1965

title: User talk:Laidani1965


text: User talk:Silvereyes2010

title: User talk:Silvereyes2010


text: User talk:Polash2011

title: User talk:Polash2011


text: User talk:Iurkik 98

title: User talk:Iurkik 98


text: User talk:Ps55555

title: User talk:Ps55555


text: User talk:Matthew.jr2000

title: User talk:Matthew.jr2000


text: User talk:Tvfanatic32

title: User talk:Tvfanatic32


text: User talk:MEMOPKA

title: User talk:MEMOPKA


text: User talk:Naseem26

title: User talk:Naseem26


text: User talk:马丁没调调

title: User talk:马丁没调调


text: User talk:Cypkerth001

title: User talk:Cypkerth001


text: User talk:Жабыш

title: User talk:Жабыш


text: User talk:AjayVinc

title: User talk:AjayVinc


text: User talk:Guel147

title: User talk:Guel147


text: User talk:MrJohn321

title: User talk:MrJohn321


text: User talk:Chandran.rajesh

title: User talk:Chandran.rajesh


text: User talk:Krdrt5367

title: User talk:Krdrt5367


text: User talk:Dwalterc

title: User talk:Dwalterc


text: User talk:Joshuaseth78

title: User talk:Joshuaseth78


text: User talk:Fpic

title: User talk:Fpic


text: User talk:Cigydd

title: User talk:Cigydd


text: User talk:Liseth fernanda villavicencio vivas


text: User talk:Elia frugoni

title: User talk:Elia frugoni


text: User talk:Ianmunro1

title: User talk:Ianmunro1


text: User talk:KingOfTheHuns

title: User talk:KingOfTheHuns


text: User talk:Drkrishan22

title: User talk:Drkrishan22


text: User talk:Ub2011

title: User talk:Ub2011


text: User talk:Fundaheredero

title: User talk:Fundaheredero


text: User talk:Beatlerosariobunbury

title: User talk:Beatlerosariobunbury


text: User talk:Khirey

title: User talk:Khirey


text: User talk:Addamelys

title: User talk:Addamelys


text: User talk:Carlweston

title: User talk:Carlweston


text: User talk:Kapor01

title: User talk:Kapor01


text: User talk:Diuss

title: User talk:Diuss


text: User talk:Colatrax

title: User talk:Colatrax


text: User talk:Cmalongo

title: User talk:Cmalongo


text: User talk:Cellimoriarty

title: User talk:Cellimoriarty


text: User talk:Marcelo Altosi

title: User talk:Marcelo Altosi


text: User talk:Vannesims

title: User talk:Vannesims


text: User talk:Xoy97

title: User talk:Xoy97


text: User talk:IonySDLF

title: User talk:IonySDLF


text: User talk:Murotjon

title: User talk:Murotjon


text: User talk:Victorious Khan

title: User talk:Victorious Khan


text: User talk:U.s.l.m.f

title: User talk:U.s.l.m.f


text: User talk:Maurito1991

title: User talk:Maurito1991


text: User talk:Christoph620

title: User talk:Christoph620


text: User talk:JESÚS JOSÉ DE LEÓN BETANCORT, SUSO.


text: User talk:Fausto león

title: User talk:Fausto león


text: User talk:HAL330

title: User talk:HAL330


text: User talk:Sarushja

title: User talk:Sarushja


text: User talk:Του Δημήτρη

title: User talk:Του Δημήτρη


text: User talk:Ianhampton

title: User talk:Ianhampton


text: User talk:Genzo Wakabayashi

title: User talk:Genzo Wakabayashi


text: User talk:Јован Јеромела

title: User talk:Јован Јеромела


text: User talk:Jjlisf7780

title: User talk:Jjlisf7780


text: User talk:Mparu

title: User talk:Mparu


text:
Wikinews:Water cooler/proposals/archives/2011/January

Simplify
I think that writing articles should be simplified. You should be able to see exactly how your submitted article is going to look like whilst editing. It's even tricky inserting a picture! Wikipedia and Wikinews is for ANYONE to edit. Taking from that, inserting images should be as easy as copy and paste from your picture file, not "insert jpg and caption here." Writing articles should be simplified.

Thank you. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Wackslas (talk • contribs)
 * Having an alternative WYSIWYG editing system that outputs standard (well formatted) wikicode when "save page" is pressed probably isn't a bad idea (it would need to output standard wikicode so that those of us who like to directly edit the pages the old fashioned way can still do so). A lot of people seem to have problems with all the code that needs to go in our articles. Even though the use of templates simplifies it a great deal, it's still a tad on the technical side for people who aren't familiar with wikicode (IE, most prospective editors). I realize that this is a "pony list" idea, due to the incredible amount of work it would be, but it's still something to think about for the long term. Gopher65talk 23:28, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Promoting 10th Anniversary Events / Local Wikipedia Support Communities
It's shameful that few people seem to know about Wikipedia's 10th Anniversary. This could have been an incredible opportunity to get articles in newspapers — and also it provides a good excuse to bring together contributors and establish face-to-face local communities or even (in the long term) chapters to support Wikipedia around the world.

One of Wikipedia's architecture (infrastructure) people visited Tokyo recently, and spoke at a "Wikipedia technology event". An advertisement (like the "Please read: A Thank You" currently displayed) was displayed at the top of the page to advertise this event locally — so presumably Wikipedia is capable of using Geo-IP to display messages targeted at specific geographic areas. The same mechanism could be / could surely have been used to display messages to logged-in contributors and editors, suggesting that they organize a local event (with Wikipedia's 10th Anniversary as the excuse) or even (in the long term) set up a local chapter.

If this is the wrong place to propose this, please suggest a better place. LittleBenW (talk) 02:06, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 * One thing is pretty clear: Wikinews is not Wikipedia. --Diego Grez return fire 02:07, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 * is what you're after. — μ 03:01, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

 * Another "better place" might be on the English language Wikipedia, which is over there. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 12:51, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

 * This is not a 'pedia. It would be self-serving navel gazing to report on Wikipedia's anniversary. Plus, this project is not ten years old. --Brian McNeil / talk 13:54, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Another main page
User:Mono/Sandbox - it's a lot cleaner than the current one; I'm looking into making it even more like a normal news site. Perhaps rotating stories?  ℳ ono   02:06, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

 * Frankly. In pretty much every particular where your proposal differs from the existing main page, I prefer the existing main page.  Leaving stuff out is a loss, not an improvement; and most of the stuff left out entirely is really important.  It's also undesirable that the proposal over-emphasizes the leads, and that it downgrades the prominence of the list of recent news.

 * We aren't a normal news site; we're better in several ways, and have priorities that don't apply to the sorts of sites you're presumably referring to.

 * Folks who've been here a lot longer have tried their hand at redesigning the main page and not come up with something most considered an improvement; I really recommend you put your Wikinews energies into writing articles. --Pi zero (talk) 04:28, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Regardless, portrait images break the template, making it unsuitable for the Main Page in its current form. I agree with Pi zero -- take a look at any news site. None have just headlines on their homepage: the BBC, an arbitary example, have links to their School of Journalism; links to RSS; portals to every major category. By the way, you seem to have accidentally set Papyrus as a font in your signature. — μ 11:07, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I must admit I like it as a starting point for a redesign. It has a much less clutted look to it Brian | (Talk) | New Zealand Portal 00:00, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
 * But it is too sparse, and lots of important/useful/interesting stuff is missing. I would suggest proposing a series of small changes to the current main page, rather than trying to start from scratch, since what we currently have was the result of a long discussion and series of proposals, until we finally reached something we all liked. However, it is possible that it could be improved, perhaps by incorporating some elements from the above proposal. I much prefer the current main page to the proposal linked above, as it stands, anyway. Δεν δοδγε  t\c 00:30, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah, hence why I said as a starting point. I think I like the leads better in this, compared to what we have atm. So, incorporation is the way to go Brian | (Talk) | New Zealand Portal 00:36, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

 * Looks hideous on a slightly lower resolution 3G device; leads are unbalanced, images overwhelming, and far, far too much missing. The current design is heavily influenced by knowledge of project output levels and the realities of a small volunteer community; this, is not. --Brian McNeil / talk 01:30, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Picture of the Year
Hi. Are you ready to restart? We want (in pl news) to restart Wikinews:Wikinews Press Photo 2011. Old contest is here: pl:Wikinews:Wikinews Press Photo. Przykuta (talk) 16:36, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The vast majority of images used on Wikinews are file photos. How do you propose having a PotY competion given that? --Brian McNeil / talk 19:35, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Only photos taken by users. I'm looking for the solution - used in this category Category:Original reporting? Of course - only free - not copyrighted. On pl wiki we have subcategory pl:Kategoria:Multimedia autorskie for articles with users photos. Przykuta (talk) 20:08, 26 January 2011 (UTC)


text: User talk:Avanidu

title: User talk:Avanidu


text: User talk:Cristianmiranda

title: User talk:Cristianmiranda


text: User talk:Shwetatotla.4

title: User talk:Shwetatotla.4


text: User talk:Apocralyptic

title: User talk:Apocralyptic


text: User talk:Teramilna

title: User talk:Teramilna


text: User talk:Meybelline Martinez Bryan

title: User talk:Meybelline Martinez Bryan


text: User talk:Memorato

title: User talk:Memorato


text: User talk:Larflores

title: User talk:Larflores


text: User talk:ToriAllen

title: User talk:ToriAllen


text: User talk:Steff977

title: User talk:Steff977


text: User talk:LanienaViktoria

title: User talk:LanienaViktoria


text: User talk:Mr.Sirus Iton

title: User talk:Mr.Sirus Iton


text: User talk:Rollinskjohn

title: User talk:Rollinskjohn


text: User talk:Echo Nolan

title: User talk:Echo Nolan


text: User talk:Momo53

title: User talk:Momo53


text: User talk:Kcobain87

title: User talk:Kcobain87


text: User talk:Mourad Bouazzati

title: User talk:Mourad Bouazzati


text: User talk:Bryantyoung

title: User talk:Bryantyoung


text:
User talk:Kamo~enwikinews

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Kamo. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Kamo~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:17, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:33, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kamo~enwikinews


text:
Comments:Bush signs to rewrite insurrection act

I think the page is wonderful, its a shame most of the American people have no inkling of an idea as to what the implication of this law actually is and means. I would also like to see more about how the application of this act is affected by the posse comitatus act and Presidential directive 51. Or if Posse comitatus is just thrown out the window due to the new version of the Insurrection Act, Posse Comitatus, and the Addition of Presidential directive 51, which is backed by the multitude of different executive orders which clearly strips the American people of there rights anytime the President feels like it.


text: User talk:Gloria l wells

title: User talk:Gloria l wells


text: User talk:HmongPolitics

title: User talk:HmongPolitics


text: User talk:Salahyx

title: User talk:Salahyx


text: User talk:SummersoulTO

title: User talk:SummersoulTO


text: User talk:SimonValéry

title: User talk:SimonValéry


text: User talk:MarvelSam

title: User talk:MarvelSam


text:
Comments:Celebrations for the time 01:02:03, 04/05/06

== Comments from feedback form - "010203 de  sp 0102034" ==

010203 de  sp 0102034 —201.95.20.139 (talk) 21:53, 24 January 2011 (UTC)


text: User talk:Johnfos

title: User talk:Johnfos


text: User talk:Brownmajic

title: User talk:Brownmajic


text: User talk:Karina2566

title: User talk:Karina2566


text:
Final US manufacturer ceases production of lethal injection drug; executions delayed

January 25, 2011 The sole United States manufacturer of a key component of lethal injections announced Friday that it will cease production of the drug, contributing to shortages and delaying executions.

, the first of a three drug cocktail used in 34 states to render the prisoner to be executed unconscious, was manufactured in Italy until Italian authorities stated that they would only license the manufacture if it was used for medical purposes and not, crucially, for executions.

In a statement, the company,, said that they have never condoned the use of their drug, marketed as 'Pentothal', in executions, and that they could not "prevent the drug from being diverted to departments of corrections for use in capital punishment procedures".

The move means that the United States is without a viable supplier for sodium thiopental. Although many European countries manufacture the drug, which is primarily used in Europe as an, no manufacturer has been found that is willing to supply it for use in conjunction with the death penalty, the abolition of which has been lobbied by the EU since 2008.

The shortage means that executions in California and Oklahoma have been delayed, with Texas' last remaining stocks of the drug due to expire in March, weeks before two scheduled executions. These delays are likely to be prolonged as the legal process of drawing up new drugs to be used for injections is lengthy. Pentobarbital, an alternative which used at the clinic in Switzerland, is used for lethal injections in Oregon, and has started to be used by Oklahoma.

Hospira's decision caused mixed reactions throughout the medical community, with the stating Monday that sodium thiopental is an "important and medically necessary anesthetic agent" that is a "first-line anesthetic in many cases", citing geriatric and cardiovascular conditions, among others. It said that, although they disagree with the death penalty, "we also do not condone using the issue as the basis to place undue burdens on the distribution of this critical drug to the United States. It is an unfortunate irony that many more lives will be lost or put in jeopardy as a result of not having the drug available for its legitimate medical use."


text: User talk:Mafindi

title: User talk:Mafindi


text: User talk:Asiimwe Richard

title: User talk:Asiimwe Richard


text: User talk:Popovg

title: User talk:Popovg


text: User talk:Turleblood

title: User talk:Turleblood


text: User talk:StooksC

title: User talk:StooksC


text: User talk:Sabina785

title: User talk:Sabina785


text:
'Bang bang': UK mercenary charged with murdering colleagues gives evidence in Iraq

January 24, 2011

Danny Fitzsimons, 30, gave evidence today to the court in, Baghdad trying him for murdering a fellow Brit and an Australian in August 2009. The security contractor said his collegues had tried to kill him in the city's, challenged the fairness of his trial and offered a plea bargain.

Fitzsimons used his pistol to kill Darren Hoare, 37, from Queensland, Australia and Paul McGuigan, 37, from, , Scotland. The first Westerner tried in Iraq since the invasion in 2003, he testified that the trio were drinking whisky and began fighting after he punched McGuigan's face. He claimed McGuigan had him at gunpoint with an while Hoare pushed him on the ground after the pair entered his room.

"I was seconds away from my death so I pulled my pistol," Fitzsimons told the three-judge panel. "I shouted twice to put down the weapon. He didn't respond to my commands, my requests, so I made a decision. I shot him [McGuigan] twice in the chest." Acting out the events, he added "Bang, bang in his chest."

Next, according to Fitzsimons, he fired a third shot, this time hitting McGuigan in the face. His widow has described the three shots as an "execution". In further testimony today Fitzsimons told the judges Hoare then grabbed the pistol and tried to force it "to my throat to kill me... and while we were wrestling I fired two shots in the chest. I made the decision and pulled the trigger."

He then fled for the British Embassy, but was stopped by an Iraqi guard who ordered the blood-soaked man to stop at gunpoint. Fitzsimons pulled his own gun and shot the guard in the thigh, for which he faces an attempted murder charge.

Iraqi law requires the entry of a plea at the end of a trial, and Fitzsimons entered not guilty pleas. He also offered the judges a plea bargain - he would plead guilty to the lesser charge of, which, unlike murder, does not carry the death penalty. The verdict has been delayed until February 20 while the judges seek documentation clarifying the accused's psychiatric state and consider if this should impact their decision as to guilt or innocence.

Fitzsimons was previously diagnosed by a medical committee with and made multiple requests to tell the judges about this. These were refused, the judges saying they were sufficiently aware of this already. Fitzsimons retorted that he believes this breaches his right to a fair trial: "This is not fair. I don't believe it is a fair trial."

The right to a fair trial is enshrined in Article 10 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which states "[e]veryone is entitled... to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of... any criminal charge against him." The Constitution of Iraq states in Article 19 "[t]he accused is innocent until proven guilty in a fair legal trial," and "[e]very person shall have the right to be treated with justice in judicial... proceedings."


text: User talk:JOB45

title: User talk:JOB45


text: User talk:Karanikolov

title: User talk:Karanikolov


text: User talk:Csekefonyo

title: User talk:Csekefonyo


text: User talk:Dfink1953

title: User talk:Dfink1953


text: User talk:Dsran7

title: User talk:Dsran7


text: User talk:Burying the trend

title: User talk:Burying the trend


text: User talk:Danny vaz contre

title: User talk:Danny vaz contre


text: User talk:Qwasx741

title: User talk:Qwasx741


text: User talk:Beautephile

title: User talk:Beautephile


text: User talk:Schmeic4

title: User talk:Schmeic4


text: Talk:'Bang bang': UK mercenary charged with murdering colleagues gives evidence in Iraq


text: Comments:'Bang bang': UK mercenary charged with murdering colleagues gives evidence in Iraq


text: User talk:Anynameworks

title: User talk:Anynameworks


text: User talk:Trojancowboy

title: User talk:Trojancowboy


text: User talk:Ajackson-selle

title: User talk:Ajackson-selle


text: User talk:Aryslinge

title: User talk:Aryslinge


text: User talk:Jacqueline1763

title: User talk:Jacqueline1763


text: User talk:72arodney

title: User talk:72arodney


text: User talk:Jheflick

title: User talk:Jheflick


text: User talk:Bmsweet85

title: User talk:Bmsweet85


text: User talk:NathanMan2000

title: User talk:NathanMan2000


text: User talk:Gal78

title: User talk:Gal78


text: User talk:Alejo34

title: User talk:Alejo34


text: User talk:Bev2001

title: User talk:Bev2001


text:
Template talk:Peer reviewed/Passed

editprotected flag Please change has been reviewed to  has been  reviewed , to allow for informal reviews to use the standardised template. Please also edit the Template:Peer reviewed/Failed template in the same place. Regards, — μ 00:07, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

 * If we want infrastructural support for informal reviews, I would think we'd want to pointedly make them look different, by using a separate template — perhaps Informally reviewed? --Pi zero (talk) 01:20, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Indeed; that would be a good option to take. I'm not sure as to how one would differentiate; colour isn't particularly important when differentiating, perhaps replacing the ambox with something else? — μ 01:27, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
 * This should be brought up at the water cooler, to get broad community feedback on whether we want to institutionalize informal peer review, as well as to get more people's ideas about how to visually distinguish the templates. Meanwhile, I'm marking this request ❌.  --Pi zero (talk) 14:40, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

title: Template talk:Peer reviewed/Passed


text:
Thread:Comments:At least 443 dead after flooding in Brazil/Comments from feedback form - ":D"

 * D


text: User talk:Marco feliz

title: User talk:Marco feliz


text: User talk:Wemo14

title: User talk:Wemo14


text: User talk:Mianardozzi

title: User talk:Mianardozzi


text: User talk:Bijn1980

title: User talk:Bijn1980


text: Talk:Final US manufacturer ceases production of lethal injection drug; executions delayed


text: User talk:Damienne17

title: User talk:Damienne17


text:
User talk:Ungoliant MMDCCLXIV

trollingBarkingFish (talk) 23:03, 26 April 2011 (UTC) an indefinite period of time

You have been unblocked as per a discussion on the Administrator's Notice Board. Gopher65talk 11:47, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ungoliant MMDCCLXIV


text: User talk:Kavipadma

title: User talk:Kavipadma


text: User talk:MrMichaelX

title: User talk:MrMichaelX


text: User talk:Evaesq

title: User talk:Evaesq


text: User talk:Cobracz

title: User talk:Cobracz


text: User talk:Fancy Logmore

title: User talk:Fancy Logmore


text: User talk:A2023

title: User talk:A2023


text: User talk:Bill Gordon

title: User talk:Bill Gordon


text: User talk:LeithaWarner3

title: User talk:LeithaWarner3


text: User talk:N.alqurashi

title: User talk:N.alqurashi


text: User talk:Pedrio35

title: User talk:Pedrio35


text: User talk:HarveyLeonard

title: User talk:HarveyLeonard


text:
User talk:72.11.138.238

Our submission guidelines
I'd like to let you know that here at the English Wikinews, we only accept English language news. You've recently made contributions that don't qualify as news. We appreciate your contributions, but we cannot accept the edits you've made, so they have been reverted or deleted.

In the future, if you'd like to submit news, we are more than happy to have your help! Just make sure to check out this article, which talks about what Wikinews is not.

Thank you for your contributions! — Mike moral  ♪♫  01:58, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:72.11.138.238


text:
User talk:98.142.212.200

Our submission guidelines
I'd like to let you know that here at the English Wikinews, we only accept English language news. You've recently made contributions that don't qualify as news. We appreciate your contributions, but we cannot accept the edits you've made, so they have been reverted or deleted.

In the future, if you'd like to submit news, we are more than happy to have your help! Just make sure to check out this article, which talks about what Wikinews is not.

Thank you for your contributions! — Mike moral  ♪♫  02:06, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:98.142.212.200


text: User talk:Davidroa0415

title: User talk:Davidroa0415


text: User talk:Jonathanhc

title: User talk:Jonathanhc


text: User talk:Hydrophobia75

title: User talk:Hydrophobia75


text: User talk:Achref10

title: User talk:Achref10


text: User talk:Efm99

title: User talk:Efm99


text: User talk:محمد رجب الصفناوي

title: User talk:محمد رجب الصفناوي


text: User talk:Edipo yocasta

title: User talk:Edipo yocasta


text: User talk:Boka9999

title: User talk:Boka9999


text:
Talk:Cheney meets with King Abdullah in Riyadh

editprotected Replace the file with File:King Abdullah with Dick Cheney George H.W. Bush, August 2005.jpg please. It is the same. --Martin H. (talk) 02:38, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

 * ❌. The original has been deleted and so it is impossible for me to verify this image is indeed the same. Hence, this change may violate WN:ARCHIVE. If you feel this particular inappropriate deletion on Commons should be chased up ahead of the others please get in touch with Amgine, who does image recovery. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 07:47, 25 January 2011 (UTC)


text: User talk:Elbertnee

title: User talk:Elbertnee


text: User talk:Charli19941

title: User talk:Charli19941


text: User talk:Significant Gravitas Shortfall


text: User talk:Nrdnn

title: User talk:Nrdnn


text:
User talk:203.45.58.141

Hi, please do not place any kind of on our website — it will be  so no one will see it. If you do want to contribute to Wikinews, see the introduction. — Mike moral  ♪♫  03:26, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:203.45.58.141


text: User talk:Honkeong

title: User talk:Honkeong


text: User talk:Jocelyn.YU

title: User talk:Jocelyn.YU


text: User talk:Heartless Seeker

title: User talk:Heartless Seeker


text: User talk:Tai Khoon

title: User talk:Tai Khoon


text: User talk:Malcolmhawkk

title: User talk:Malcolmhawkk


text: User talk:Calvin Neonardi

title: User talk:Calvin Neonardi


text: User talk:Bobish35

title: User talk:Bobish35


text: User talk:Mukkakukaku

title: User talk:Mukkakukaku


text: User talk:Sakcmx

title: User talk:Sakcmx


text: User talk:Joshhhjonesss

title: User talk:Joshhhjonesss


text: User talk:Gabriel23x

title: User talk:Gabriel23x


text: User talk:Rahulkumarmallik

title: User talk:Rahulkumarmallik


text: User talk:Shamirsj

title: User talk:Shamirsj


text: User talk:Bibi boo58

title: User talk:Bibi boo58


text: User talk:Alexfeliu

title: User talk:Alexfeliu


text:
User talk:Somangowda1988

Our submission guidelines
I'd like to let you know that here at the English Wikinews, we only accept English language news. You've recently made contributions that don't qualify as news. We appreciate your contributions, but we cannot accept the edits you've made, so they have been reverted or deleted.

In the future, if you'd like to submit news, we are more than happy to have your help! Just make sure to check out this article, which talks about what Wikinews is not.

Thank you for your contributions! — Mike moral  ♪♫  06:18, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Somangowda1988


text: User talk:X MrElmo x

title: User talk:X MrElmo x


text: User talk:Zergut

title: User talk:Zergut


text: User talk:Leroutier77

title: User talk:Leroutier77


text: User talk:Anotherdisc

title: User talk:Anotherdisc


text: User talk:WaraC.

title: User talk:WaraC.


text: User talk:MyBonus

title: User talk:MyBonus


text: User talk:Tstaudt

title: User talk:Tstaudt


text: User talk:Thienlongbd

title: User talk:Thienlongbd


text: User talk:Urvishdesai

title: User talk:Urvishdesai


text: User talk:Granedoy

title: User talk:Granedoy


text: User talk:Adi ripong

title: User talk:Adi ripong


text: User talk:Sebamban city

title: User talk:Sebamban city


text: User talk:Drgrchaudharyvet

title: User talk:Drgrchaudharyvet


text: User talk:Techoadi

title: User talk:Techoadi


text: User talk:Gnilloc

title: User talk:Gnilloc


text:
Comments:Locals claim to have seen a UFO in Honolulu, Hawaii

Comments from feedback form - "excwllent"
excwllent —14.198.75.240 (talk) 06:23, 25 January 2011 (UTC)


text: User talk:Gem500

title: User talk:Gem500


text: User talk:Intel-Excel

title: User talk:Intel-Excel


text: User talk:EmiAttias

title: User talk:EmiAttias


text: User talk:Khaled343

title: User talk:Khaled343


text: User talk:Dwi banet

title: User talk:Dwi banet


text: User talk:Sboopathy123

title: User talk:Sboopathy123


text: User talk:Memberofc1

title: User talk:Memberofc1


text: User talk:Touhaku

title: User talk:Touhaku


text: User talk:Okafor valentine

title: User talk:Okafor valentine


text: User talk:Jivagotupa

title: User talk:Jivagotupa


text: User talk:YoungC902

title: User talk:YoungC902


text: User talk:Bhatt sweta

title: User talk:Bhatt sweta


text: User talk:Ednambz

title: User talk:Ednambz


text: User talk:Nikeshhsingh

title: User talk:Nikeshhsingh


text: User talk:Rustam.Techno

title: User talk:Rustam.Techno


text: User talk:Editorinfo

title: User talk:Editorinfo


text: User talk:Fargot1281

title: User talk:Fargot1281


text: User talk:Coremachine

title: User talk:Coremachine


text: User talk:Sandiaz

title: User talk:Sandiaz


text: User talk:Wanto samudra

title: User talk:Wanto samudra


text: User talk:Jramzeelan

title: User talk:Jramzeelan


text: User talk:Carter.A.Jenkins

title: User talk:Carter.A.Jenkins


text: User talk:Softkitty

title: User talk:Softkitty


text: User talk:Carloratm

title: User talk:Carloratm


text: User talk:Andipapp

title: User talk:Andipapp


text: User talk:Red Echidna

title: User talk:Red Echidna


text: User talk:Mouchak.elara

title: User talk:Mouchak.elara


text: User talk:Rikaherlina

title: User talk:Rikaherlina


text: User talk:Kumar88kk

title: User talk:Kumar88kk


text: User talk:Ashirr

title: User talk:Ashirr


text: User talk:Tal55501

title: User talk:Tal55501


text: User talk:Peascolor

title: User talk:Peascolor


text: User talk:Dat123456

title: User talk:Dat123456


text: User talk:Musicman0752

title: User talk:Musicman0752


text: User talk:Hamzatoon

title: User talk:Hamzatoon


text: User talk:Gamalmoussa1

title: User talk:Gamalmoussa1


text:
Indonesians charged with people-smuggling following Christmas Island wreck

{{date|January 27, 2011}}

Three Indonesians have been charged with people-smuggling by Australian authorities after a shipwreck off {{w|Christmas Island}} last month. Over 50 people were killed when the vessel, carrying mainly Iraqi, Iranian & Kurdish asylum seekers, smashed against rocks on December 15 after its engine failed.

The trio, ages 22, 32 and 60, appeared in a {{w|Perth}} court charged with, "facilitating the bringing to Australia of a group of five or more persons," according to police. The case, which is now adjourned for three weeks, could result in a 20 year prison sentence. The three Indonesians will reappear in court on 15 Febuary via video link. Their attourney, David McKenzie, stated that the men are "unhappy" and that the wreck was "a total tragedy and they're very upset."

A day earlier, an Australian Customs internal report cleared both the Customs authorities and the Navy of any blame, stating that all personnel acted appropriately and exercised good judgment. Eight recommendations have been made to prevent a similar incident, including the establishment of a land-based radar system to monitor northern maritime approaches to the island. The recommendations will be implemented by June 30, 2011.

{{haveyoursay}}


text: User talk:Askkorsani

title: User talk:Askkorsani


text: User talk:HansNg7

title: User talk:HansNg7


text: User talk:Shooterone

title: User talk:Shooterone


text: User talk:Luke292

title: User talk:Luke292


text: User talk:Igol4373

title: User talk:Igol4373


text: User talk:Jhello

title: User talk:Jhello


text: User talk:الهادى عبد الفتاح يوسف

title: User talk:الهادى عبد الفتاح يوسف


text: User talk:Texasdgrewing

title: User talk:Texasdgrewing


text: User talk:Tserto

title: User talk:Tserto


text: User talk:HeavenlyDove

title: User talk:HeavenlyDove


text:
Talk:Indonesians charged with people-smuggling following Christmas Island wreck

[Link to internal review. Everything should be in the news sources, however. — [[User:Microchip08|μ]] 10:57, 25 January 2011 (UTC)


text: User talk:BlackTarHeroin

title: User talk:BlackTarHeroin


text: User talk:Ze Tomes

title: User talk:Ze Tomes


text: User talk:Samin61

title: User talk:Samin61


text:
Four killed, fourteen others injured at bus blast in Philippines

January 29, 2011 An explosion occurred in a bus in the, in Makati City, Philippines on Tuesday. The blast occurred in shortly before 2 p.m. Four are dead with fourteen more wounded.

After the explosion, the National Capital Region Police Office's Director, Nicanor Bartolome, said that he formed a special investigation team and the city has formed a crisis management committee.

condoled the grieving families of the dead. The Metro Manila police are now on full alert following the blast. The bus was an air-conditioned model, plate number TXJ-710.

After news reached the spokesman Eduardo Lacierda said that the cause of the blast was "some sort of explosive device placed in the vicinity of the middle of the bus." Many passengers had already got off before the explosion; almost half disembarked at.

A survivor said that they did not notice the explosion because they were all busy watching television. The bus driver noticed an abnormal smell, namely gunpowder. He stated that mechanical failure could not possibly be the cause. The police are yet to establish what type of explosive was used.


text: User talk:Jamcpot

title: User talk:Jamcpot


text: User talk:Grodz jur

title: User talk:Grodz jur


text: User talk:Madushan1995

title: User talk:Madushan1995


text: User talk:Георгий Тюрин

title: User talk:Георгий Тюрин


text:
Ivory Coast trade embargo backed by US

January 27, 2011

The United States has stated Monday that it will support a month-long ban on cocoa exports from the Ivory Coast, which was called for by its internationally recognised president, Alassane Ouattara. The move comes as Laurent Gbagbo, the incumbent president of Côte d'Ivoire, refused to concede the presidency after November's election.

Ouattara hopes that the embargo will result in Gbagbo being forced to resign, unable to pay civil servants, including the security forces, due to lost revenue. "We do support President Ouattara's call for a month-long ban on cocoa exports, our embassy is in touch with relevant players on this", said US State Department spokesman Philip Crowley.

US agricultural firm, which buys around 15% of Ivorian cocoa, have said they are "temporarily suspending" those purchases. "We are working with others in the industry and with the authorities to clarify and resolve the situation as quickly as possible", Cargill stated.

Gbagbo's finance minister, Desire Dalo, denied that the embargo has had any effect on the country's cocoa production. , one of the world's largest confectionery manufacturers, said in a statement that "as a major end-user of Ivorian cocoa we will work with our suppliers in the face of this ban", and that "in the short term this will not impact our ability to manufacture the chocolate products".

title: Ivory Coast trade embargo backed by US


text: User talk:Gobingoo

title: User talk:Gobingoo


text: User talk:حسوني2

title: User talk:حسوني2


text: User talk:Abhishek0692

title: User talk:Abhishek0692


text: User talk:Gjohn4ljc

title: User talk:Gjohn4ljc


text: User talk:Poulkruijt

title: User talk:Poulkruijt


text: User talk:Avalski toranj

title: User talk:Avalski toranj


text: User talk:Dawtjan

title: User talk:Dawtjan


text: User talk:みんくり

title: User talk:みんくり


text: User talk:FacebookDJ

title: User talk:FacebookDJ


text: User talk:DobEx-T

title: User talk:DobEx-T


text: User talk:Narnian lady

title: User talk:Narnian lady


text: User talk:Mahani ahmad

title: User talk:Mahani ahmad


text: User talk:Rahulrjndrn02

title: User talk:Rahulrjndrn02


text: User talk:Goloviznin

title: User talk:Goloviznin


text: User talk:San Mao

title: User talk:San Mao


text: User talk:911ricky

title: User talk:911ricky


text: User talk:Mersha.tesfa

title: User talk:Mersha.tesfa


text: User talk:Mostek1970

title: User talk:Mostek1970


text: User talk:Lettiti

title: User talk:Lettiti


text: User talk:Martina basic

title: User talk:Martina basic


text: User talk:Omegaile

title: User talk:Omegaile


text: User talk:Mmarena

title: User talk:Mmarena


text: User talk:Pavi-Tch

title: User talk:Pavi-Tch


text: User talk:Apobuttu

title: User talk:Apobuttu


text: User talk:Gejčinapederčina

title: User talk:Gejčinapederčina


text: User talk:Shilpa pandey

title: User talk:Shilpa pandey


text: User talk:Microsona

title: User talk:Microsona


text: User talk:Edifyyo

title: User talk:Edifyyo


text: User talk:Budislav Minić

title: User talk:Budislav Minić


text: User talk:Aydin 585

title: User talk:Aydin 585


text: User talk:Kiranuday1989

title: User talk:Kiranuday1989


text: User talk:Kaleshg

title: User talk:Kaleshg


text: User talk:XxPunkanimexX

title: User talk:XxPunkanimexX


text: User talk:Nnazari

title: User talk:Nnazari


text: User talk:Oscar Monardez Saguas

title: User talk:Oscar Monardez Saguas


text: User talk:Mario.naumann

title: User talk:Mario.naumann


text: User talk:Rebeccadi

title: User talk:Rebeccadi


text: User talk:Pablinkwilly14

title: User talk:Pablinkwilly14


text: User talk:Quy.giangngoc

title: User talk:Quy.giangngoc


text: User talk:Buyung fajri

title: User talk:Buyung fajri


text: User talk:Segognat

title: User talk:Segognat


text: User talk:Bharathreigns

title: User talk:Bharathreigns


text: User talk:Annita.n

title: User talk:Annita.n


text: User talk:Ich bin L

title: User talk:Ich bin L


text: User talk:Frizzo96

title: User talk:Frizzo96


text: User talk:Abhishek.rao567

title: User talk:Abhishek.rao567


text: User talk:Shaswat.sood

title: User talk:Shaswat.sood


text: User talk:Marrionne

title: User talk:Marrionne


text: User talk:Scuzzmonkey

title: User talk:Scuzzmonkey


text: User talk:Weyyudi

title: User talk:Weyyudi


text: User talk:Panathinaikos23

title: User talk:Panathinaikos23


text: User talk:RazaDotani

title: User talk:RazaDotani


text: User talk:Botizan Emanuel

title: User talk:Botizan Emanuel


text: User talk:Anton dohrn

title: User talk:Anton dohrn


text:
User talk:Vijayanbee

your first article
Hello Vijayanbee, welcome to Wikinews! The End of Endosulfan article you started failed a review. It needs some more work before it can be published, please see its talk page for details. Thank you. -Gryllida 05:26, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Vijayanbee


text:
Comments:Annie Awards for animation Sunday; Wikinews will be there

Comments from feedback form - "sorry u guys dont get even 1% ..."
sorry u guys dont get even 1% of the moneterial recognition worthy of your job —117.195.164.231 (talk) 16:18, 25 January 2011 (UTC)


text: User talk:Mangaljit Singh

title: User talk:Mangaljit Singh


text: User talk:Pokemon59

title: User talk:Pokemon59


text: User talk:Summerandangeljones

title: User talk:Summerandangeljones


text: User talk:Baumi1967

title: User talk:Baumi1967


text: User talk:Kiran raut

title: User talk:Kiran raut


text: User talk:Alldwapall

title: User talk:Alldwapall


text: User talk:Christiantecson

title: User talk:Christiantecson


text: User talk:Parrett94

title: User talk:Parrett94


text: User talk:Chenotebook

title: User talk:Chenotebook


text: User talk:Sirconcept

title: User talk:Sirconcept


text: User talk:Ajit9singh

title: User talk:Ajit9singh


text: User talk:Naveenl93

title: User talk:Naveenl93


text: User talk:Empule

title: User talk:Empule


text: User talk:Salyanti

title: User talk:Salyanti


text: User talk:Shadowslayer881

title: User talk:Shadowslayer881


text: User talk:Lavalverde

title: User talk:Lavalverde


text: User talk:AdrielFPassos

title: User talk:AdrielFPassos


text: User talk:Tvbsmanyam

title: User talk:Tvbsmanyam


text: User talk:Pecinta budaya

title: User talk:Pecinta budaya


text: User talk:ShayanAnwer

title: User talk:ShayanAnwer


text: User talk:Marcorossi2

title: User talk:Marcorossi2


text: User talk:GaetanoMC80

title: User talk:GaetanoMC80


text: User talk:矢靡它

title: User talk:矢靡它


text:
User talk:Tzar50~enwikinews

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Tzar50. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Tzar50~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:22, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:39, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tzar50~enwikinews


text: User talk:Prof dora

title: User talk:Prof dora


text: User talk:Truthseekah

title: User talk:Truthseekah


text: User talk:Marnaruto

title: User talk:Marnaruto


text: User talk:O-R

title: User talk:O-R


text: User talk:Jmansilla

title: User talk:Jmansilla


text: User talk:Chandanarathuge

title: User talk:Chandanarathuge


text: User talk:Junkie pumpkin

title: User talk:Junkie pumpkin


text: User talk:Yuryerivanov

title: User talk:Yuryerivanov


text: User talk:Avtarjit

title: User talk:Avtarjit


text: User talk:Judygreenberg

title: User talk:Judygreenberg


text: User talk:Whitestar8823

title: User talk:Whitestar8823


text: User talk:Eder botto

title: User talk:Eder botto


text: User talk:Amanmilwani

title: User talk:Amanmilwani


text: User talk:Dubiousdancer

title: User talk:Dubiousdancer


text: User talk:Arti kumari

title: User talk:Arti kumari


text: User talk:Nayak.rakesh70

title: User talk:Nayak.rakesh70


text: User talk:Industrias Magon

title: User talk:Industrias Magon


text: User talk:Josefyg

title: User talk:Josefyg


text:
Comments:US Supreme Court justices accused of conflict of interest

So what is the difference between what Koch does and what Soros does? Is it Progressive versus Conservative? Is it Left versus Right? I think Thomas Jefferson was correct all those years ago when he said we should not have Parties because the people who voted in Congress would suffer due to each side concerned about themselves and not the country, in general.


text: User talk:Oybahabri

title: User talk:Oybahabri


text: User talk:Patches3659

title: User talk:Patches3659


text: User talk:Rabindra.nonia

title: User talk:Rabindra.nonia


text: User talk:Jules*

title: User talk:Jules*


text: User talk:Mysofiahouse

title: User talk:Mysofiahouse


text: User talk:Deutza14

title: User talk:Deutza14


text: User talk:Roboguy99

title: User talk:Roboguy99


text: User talk:Diegonery

title: User talk:Diegonery


text: User talk:Aiden Grimshaw

title: User talk:Aiden Grimshaw


text: User talk:Rainyplaces

title: User talk:Rainyplaces


text: User talk:Orlandazzo

title: User talk:Orlandazzo


text: User talk:Shrmohan

title: User talk:Shrmohan


text: User talk:الحمد لله رب العالمي

title: User talk:الحمد لله رب العالمي


text: User talk:Berty68

title: User talk:Berty68


text: User talk:Ahaze26

title: User talk:Ahaze26


text:
Wikinews:Water cooler/assistance/archives/2011/January

Wikinews feeds are broken
Feeds for many news categories rely on feeds from "Zach" - e.g. http://toolserver.org/~zach/cgi-bin/rss.cgi?cat=Climate_change on Climate change

Zach's account on toolserver has expired ("403: User account expired") and the feeds are broken.

I've emailed Zach - no response so far. --Chriswaterguy (talk) 18:46, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I think something similar can also be done with my RSS script, for example http://toolserver.org/~cspurrier/rss/rss.php?lang=en&family=wikinews&categories=Climate_change --Cspurrier (talk) 02:39, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia turns 10
I have just created a new article called Wikipedia turns 10, for when Wikipedia reaches exactly ten years since going online on Saturday. Can I please have some assistance with creating this article? -- Rayboy8 ( my talk ) ( my contributions ) 00:50, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Working on it.--Ashershow1talk 03:41, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

 * Take it to the signpost; Wikinews is not a cheerleader for Wikipedia or its in-house newsletter. --Brian McNeil / talk 11:15, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Mayor declares weather emergency in New York City
Can someone quickly review Mayor declares weather emergency in New York City before it gets stale?--Ashershow1talk 01:54, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

about a subject?
do people have to have an account; with wikinew's in order to have a discussion with a particular subject or the person discussing the particular subject.
 * I'm sorry if I misunderstood your question, but you do not need to register an account in order to contribute to Wikinews, but we do recommend it for a variety of reasons.
 * By the way, in future, please remember to sign your posts with four tildes so we know who said what and when - it can get confusing if people forget to sign their posts in lengthy discussions. Anyway, welcome to Wikinews! Δεν δοδγε  t\c 22:19, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

How do I merge my accounts?
I have changed my user name in Wikipedia. Now except for Wikipedia, I have 2 user names. How do I merge them?--AshwiniKalantri (talk) 08:36, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

 * A common solution is to post a redirect on the User page and User talk page of the old user name, linking them to similar pages with the new one. A user would do this while logged in under the old username, so we can easily see it isn't vandalism.

 * If you haven't edited yet with the new username, then you could instead use Changing username

 * --InfantGorilla (talk) 10:08, 30 January 2011 (UTC)


text: User talk:1clkgtramg

title: User talk:1clkgtramg


text: User talk:Towangqi

title: User talk:Towangqi


text: User talk:Grupcav

title: User talk:Grupcav


text: User talk:May t

title: User talk:May t


text: User talk:W0rdSlinger11

title: User talk:W0rdSlinger11


text: User talk:Reinier.maliepaard

title: User talk:Reinier.maliepaard


text: User talk:Nesa0treb

title: User talk:Nesa0treb


text: User talk:Siegrist47

title: User talk:Siegrist47


text: User talk:Bhattarairamhari

title: User talk:Bhattarairamhari


text: User talk:Andris384

title: User talk:Andris384


text: User talk:Id0ruu

title: User talk:Id0ruu


text:
User talk:Id0ru~enwikinews

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Id0ru. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Id0ru~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:19, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:32, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Id0ru~enwikinews


text: User talk:Topboy69

title: User talk:Topboy69


text: User talk:Jliang32

title: User talk:Jliang32


text: User talk:Coollycooler

title: User talk:Coollycooler


text: User talk:Freddie007

title: User talk:Freddie007


text: User talk:Lebaron83

title: User talk:Lebaron83


text: User talk:Dgiuntini

title: User talk:Dgiuntini


text: User talk:Ascemocome

title: User talk:Ascemocome


text: User talk:Cgaldine

title: User talk:Cgaldine


text: User talk:Update12345

title: User talk:Update12345


text: User talk:Lastrada

title: User talk:Lastrada


text: User talk:Andersonfeluz

title: User talk:Andersonfeluz


text: User talk:Masonbryan1

title: User talk:Masonbryan1


text: User talk:Pedja1982

title: User talk:Pedja1982


text: User talk:Mrbadalyan

title: User talk:Mrbadalyan


text: User talk:Zainiadragon10000

title: User talk:Zainiadragon10000


text: User talk:Augustus romulus

title: User talk:Augustus romulus


text: User talk:Boolyme

title: User talk:Boolyme


text:
User:Boolyme

Hi

title: User:Boolyme


text: User talk:Vittorio Lupo

title: User talk:Vittorio Lupo


text: User talk:Rafawbraga

title: User talk:Rafawbraga


text:
User talk:Apricot~enwikinews

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Apricot. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Apricot~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:12, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:28, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Apricot~enwikinews


text: User talk:Alojeme

title: User talk:Alojeme


text: User talk:Wowkiddo

title: User talk:Wowkiddo


text: User talk:Sarapovanincigligi

title: User talk:Sarapovanincigligi


text: User talk:Mgorbzxo

title: User talk:Mgorbzxo


text: User talk:Madasafox

title: User talk:Madasafox


text: User talk:Caganigeria

title: User talk:Caganigeria


text:
BBC World Service to drop five languages

January 27, 2011

According to the BBC News website, five languages are to be cut from the BBC World Service's coverage. ,, and are no longer going to be used on the global radio station, and  will no longer be used in African regional programmes, nor English in the Caribbean. Seven undisclosed languages are also going to be scaled back. The cuts mean that approximately 650 jobs will be lost in order to save around £46m. The cuts were officially announced at a staff briefing on Thursday.

The BBC's director of global news, Peter Horrocks, said that the cuts were "not a reflection on the performance of individual services or programmes", and were cut due to a "need to make savings", after the Government's grant-in-aid funding was cut. The BBC took over funding the World Service in October 2010, previously funded by the Foreign Office. The move comes just days after announcements that the funding for the BBC website is to be slashed by £34m as part of 25% cuts across the spectrum of services offered by the taxpayer-funded broadcaster.

The National Union of Journalists protested the "drastic cuts" outside the World Service headquarters today, stating that the loss of the language editions "severely damage the national interest of the UK".


text: User talk:Wilton gorske

title: User talk:Wilton gorske


text: User talk:Bolzhang

title: User talk:Bolzhang


text: User talk:Qsdfqsdf

title: User talk:Qsdfqsdf


text: User talk:Yongsil555

title: User talk:Yongsil555


text: User talk:Fatdog23

title: User talk:Fatdog23


text: Comments:Final US manufacturer ceases production of lethal injection drug; executions delayed


text: User talk:Wikinventor

title: User talk:Wikinventor


text: User talk:Tadashie

title: User talk:Tadashie


text: User talk:Agesanunciosgratis

title: User talk:Agesanunciosgratis


text: User talk:Uttam shrestha

title: User talk:Uttam shrestha


text: User talk:Nivedita.murthy

title: User talk:Nivedita.murthy


text: User talk:Oneamazingperson

title: User talk:Oneamazingperson


text: User talk:Romixan

title: User talk:Romixan


text: User talk:Serotinal

title: User talk:Serotinal


text: User talk:BeholdMyGlory

title: User talk:BeholdMyGlory


text: User talk:Rosewinguk

title: User talk:Rosewinguk


text: User talk:ArmenianKnight

title: User talk:ArmenianKnight


text: User talk:Tedagous

title: User talk:Tedagous


text: User talk:S.manivasagam

title: User talk:S.manivasagam


text: User talk:Antonyrinaldo

title: User talk:Antonyrinaldo


text: User talk:DFalt247

title: User talk:DFalt247


text: User talk:Brm162

title: User talk:Brm162


text: User talk:Perp le lips

title: User talk:Perp le lips


text: User talk:Rock roll26

title: User talk:Rock roll26


text: User talk:D2sub

title: User talk:D2sub


text: User talk:Subanarki

title: User talk:Subanarki


text: User talk:Spender2001

title: User talk:Spender2001


text: User talk:Letuyenk51

title: User talk:Letuyenk51


text: User talk:MajinCline

title: User talk:MajinCline


text: User talk:Kishorjoshi910

title: User talk:Kishorjoshi910


text: User talk:Mluc555

title: User talk:Mluc555


text: User talk:Stickfigure404

title: User talk:Stickfigure404


text: User talk:Neohertz

title: User talk:Neohertz


text: User talk:Albalove

title: User talk:Albalove


text: User talk:Dynastyrecord

title: User talk:Dynastyrecord


text: User talk:色设度

title: User talk:色设度


text: User talk:FaustoDimarco

title: User talk:FaustoDimarco


text: User talk:Vamsi1105

title: User talk:Vamsi1105


text: User talk:EUsedtrue

title: User talk:EUsedtrue


text: User talk:30mag

title: User talk:30mag


text: User talk:Seabranch

title: User talk:Seabranch


text: User talk:Darkbayleef

title: User talk:Darkbayleef


text: User talk:Jeffhos

title: User talk:Jeffhos


text: User talk:Khalil.kra

title: User talk:Khalil.kra


text: User talk:Gabs79

title: User talk:Gabs79


text: User talk:Shewei8587

title: User talk:Shewei8587


text: User talk:Simouaziz

title: User talk:Simouaziz


text: User talk:Dinesh jethu

title: User talk:Dinesh jethu


text: User talk:Shailesh kachhara

title: User talk:Shailesh kachhara


text: User talk:Lunatichimes

title: User talk:Lunatichimes


text: User talk:Jhampol

title: User talk:Jhampol


text: User talk:Munish651

title: User talk:Munish651


text: User talk:Sureshpalanivel

title: User talk:Sureshpalanivel


text: User talk:Agentblank

title: User talk:Agentblank


text: User talk:Islandtiki

title: User talk:Islandtiki


text: User talk:FbtjMsxg0zEFTeCH

title: User talk:FbtjMsxg0zEFTeCH


text: User talk:11arun11

title: User talk:11arun11


text: User talk:Vtdungyb

title: User talk:Vtdungyb


text: User talk:Vicente campos reyes

title: User talk:Vicente campos reyes


text: User talk:Zoloo321

title: User talk:Zoloo321


text: User talk:ZasaOfficial

title: User talk:ZasaOfficial


text: User talk:Agniputram

title: User talk:Agniputram


text: User talk:Sanjaya pradeep

title: User talk:Sanjaya pradeep


text: User talk:Kcdipesh

title: User talk:Kcdipesh


text: User talk:Reeteshrathor

title: User talk:Reeteshrathor


text: User talk:TheCrazyTurk

title: User talk:TheCrazyTurk


text: User talk:Floricord

title: User talk:Floricord


text: User talk:Joey bear

title: User talk:Joey bear


text: User talk:T1822

title: User talk:T1822


text: User talk:Shrukain

title: User talk:Shrukain


text: User talk:D.war88

title: User talk:D.war88


text: User talk:IhdaFaradisa

title: User talk:IhdaFaradisa


text: User talk:Raghav maloo

title: User talk:Raghav maloo


text: User talk:Arsam2010

title: User talk:Arsam2010


text: User talk:Abhin.s

title: User talk:Abhin.s


text: User talk:Leonatti

title: User talk:Leonatti


text: User talk:Andmatand

title: User talk:Andmatand


text: User talk:Tania warner

title: User talk:Tania warner


text: User talk:Kurtsath

title: User talk:Kurtsath


text: User talk:Ntthiennt

title: User talk:Ntthiennt


text: User talk:Scientificexcellence

title: User talk:Scientificexcellence


text: User talk:MMarson

title: User talk:MMarson


text:
Boy arrested for murder after seventeen-year-old run over by bus

January 27, 2011 A fifteen-year-old boy has been arrested in, London, England after Ezekiel Amosu, 17, was run over by a bus Monday night. detectives said that Amosu may have been "involved in an altercation with a group of teenagers immediately beforehand".

Amosu was walking with four friends when they were approached by a group of youths, who asked for Amosu's mobile phone. It is unclear as to whether Amousu was attempting to escape, or was pushed under the bus during the fight. The officer in charge of the investigation, Detective Chief Inspector John Sandlin, stated that "[w]hat happened exactly is unclear at this stage but we believe that he may have been the victim of an attempted robbery minutes beforehand".

The number 123 bus was traveling west towards when the impact happened, at the intersection of Forest Road and Pembar Avenue, resulting in Amosu receiving fatal crush injuries. Amosu was declared dead at the scene, which was attended by homicide detectives after reports of a fight in the street before the incident.

Anyone with information is requested to contact the police incident room on +44 (0) 20 8345 3865, or anonymously via.


text: User talk:Sadanandparhar

title: User talk:Sadanandparhar


text: User talk:ادريس

title: User talk:ادريس


text: User talk:Zvezdan999

title: User talk:Zvezdan999