text:
Talk:Prince William marries Kate Middleton—live updates

Sourcing
I will place the sources for the article here, though I will be watching the BBC One feed of the wedding which will account for much of the sourcing.

Introduction
Prince William of Wales, the second in line to the British throne, and Kate Middleton will today be married at Westminster Abbey in London. Thousands of people are expected to line the streets of the city as the couple travel through the capital to the Abbey, and then back to Buckingham Palace, ( and millions are thought to be planning to watch the event on television around the world. . Wikinews will be following the royal wedding as it happens on this live blog; you will be able to contact us with your thoughts throughout the day on the comments page, on our Twitter page, or on Facebook.

Updates

 * Good morning and welcome to live updates of the royal wedding of and . Wikinews will be following the events throughout the day and you can contact us with your opinions as the wedding progresses either on our website, or on Twitter or Facebook. The wedding service will begin later this morning, and William and Kate's family will be in attendance at the Abbey. After the service the royal couple will travel to Buckingham Palace for the, and the bride, groom, and both their families including , will appear on the balcony. (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13097243)

 * 600,000 people are expected to be in London today to celebrate the marriage, (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13229961) and it is thought many millions will watch it around the world on television. (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-13228153) Several hundred people have been camping along the route the couple will take in a hope of seeing the newlyweds. (http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/world/73987/prince-william-meets-fans-ahead-of-wedding) 1,900 people have been invited to attend the ceremony inside the Abbey, including 50 foreign state heads. (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13229961) Kate yesterday took part in a final rehearsal with the, , and the pageboys and bridesmaids, yesterday, which William did not attend. (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/royal-wedding/8479780/Royal-wedding-Kate-Middleton-arrives-at-Westminster-Abbey-for-final-rehearsal.html) William and Kate last night said in a message in the that they had been "incredibly moved" by the support for their marriage. The message said,

 * "We are both so delighted that you are able to join us in celebrating what we hope will be one of the happiest days of our lives. The affection shown to us by so many people during our engagement has been incredibly moving, and has touched us both deeply. We would like to take this opportunity to thank everyone most sincerely for their kindness." (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13217693)

 * Rail companies have said they expect 400,000 people to travel to the capital by train this morning, but insist they will be able to handle the significantly increased passenger numbers. Thousands of international journalists have also come to London, and will be reporting from specially constructed news studios around the capital. Police officials at raided numerous properties—occupied, it was reported, by —yesterday because of the wedding, but  seized on the raids as "disproportionate". The weather in London is expected to begin as cloudy and dry, and brighten throughout the morning. Forecasters have warned of a 30 percent risk of rain at the time when William and Kate leave the Abbey after the ceremony, and an even greater risk of heavy showers towards the end of the day. (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13217693)

 * One of the biggest questions around the Abbey right now is what dress Kate will be wearing. It'll only be revealed when she leaves her hotel near later this morning—9:51 UTC to be precise—but there have already been some interesting developments. (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13132410) British newspaper  has reports that a woman, disguised by a large headpiece, jumped out of her car and into the hotel yesterday evening—their are suspicions she might be the designer. She was apparently wearing several clothes favoured by, the late 's creative director. (http://fashion.telegraph.co.uk/columns/hilary-alexander/TMG8481788/Royal-wedding-tantalising-clue-points-to-Sarah-Burton-as-Kate-Middletons-dress-designer.html) During the ceremony, Kate will pledge to "love, comfort, honour and keep" her husband, but not to "obey" him. (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13132410)

 * police are reportedly now carrying out their final checks before the festivities get underway. Three people were arrested in, London, last night over allegations they were planning to behead effigies on the streets of London today. A was allegedly seized in a raid; the suspects remain in custody this morning. The  said they had been detained on "suspicion of conspiracy to cause a public nuisance and breach of the peace". A spokesperson for the force said they were believed to be "planning to attend the royal wedding." (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-13234682)

7:10 UTC Update - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13132410

7:50 UTC Update - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-12896255 and http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13132410

9: 00 Utc update - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13175842 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/royal-wedding/8482347/Royal-wedding-Syrian-ambassador-embarrassed-at-being-disinvited.html http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13181999

9:30 UTC - BBC One.

9:50 UTC- BBC One and bomb threat: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/royal-wedding/live/8466247/Royal-wedding-live.html

10.07 -BBC One

10.20 - BBC One and http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/blog/2011/apr/29/prince-william-kate-middleton-royal-wedding-live-blog

10.23 - BBC One

10.33 - BBC One

10.53 - BBC One and http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/blog/2011/apr/29/prince-william-kate-middleton-royal-wedding-live-blog

11.10, 11.17, and 11.29 - BBC One.

11.44 - http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/blog/2011/apr/29/prince-william-kate-middleton-royal-wedding-live-blog

12.23, 12.28, 12.49 - BBC One.

01.02 - http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/blog/2011/apr/29/prince-william-kate-middleton-royal-wedding-live-blog

01.30 - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13132410

2.07 - http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/royal-wedding/live/8466247/Royal-wedding-live.html and http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/blog/2011/apr/29/prince-william-kate-middleton-royal-wedding-live-blog

3.00 - http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/royal-wedding/live/8466247/Royal-wedding-live.html and http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/blog/2011/apr/29/prince-william-kate-middleton-royal-wedding-live-blog

4.04 - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13132410

4.26 - http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/royal-wedding/live/8466247/Royal-wedding-live.html

Review of revision 1222781 [Failed]
In that case, can somebody please put it up for review ASAP after 0000UTC so it can be reviewed before things get underway, since I'm going to bed now. Thanks,  wacky wace  21:43, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Tweetery
I'm shaking my head in horror at this. It's hideous. Wikinews isn't a TV channel, nor a twitter feed. This is just... "wrong" in so many ways. --Brian McNeil / talk 10:58, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * So because we haven't done it before means we can't do it at all? I think one of the problems with Wikinews is its lack of innovation. Also, I did notify everyone more than two weeks ago of my intention to run this live blog today, but got no objections.  wacky wace  14:22, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I think this looks lik a fawning train wreck. It's not celebrity gossip, but it is being presented as such. I certainly would not have stuck it on 1st lead; it was a well-known-in-advance event, and pretending you're a Dimbleby is pretty poor form. But, let's see how the rest of the community judges this; someone gave it a passing review, and someone keeps sighting the new revisions. --Brian McNeil / talk 14:39, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Pretending to be a Dimbleby? Where? As far as I am concerned, this live blog is of the same quality as the ones run by numerous other respectful organisations today, including the Guardian, Telegraph and BBC. This live blog has been modelled on live blogs run by other media organisations. Are live blogs too informal altogether? If anyone thought so, like I said, they had more than two weeks to raise it at the water cooler.  wacky wace  14:49, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm personally not a big fan of the article because it's celebrity "news" (Smile.png), but other than that I don't see anything wrong with using the live update format. I think it helps the reader follow the chronological order of events more easily. We do celebrity news all the time, much to my (and your, sometimes) chagrin, but it's within our content policies. Tempodivalse [talk]  15:17, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * "this live blog is of the same quality as the ones run by numerous other respectful organisations"; I could put that in far, far less charitable terms. But, you use the very term which is why I do not think this should have been done on Wikinews — blog. Wikinews is, most definitely not a "blog". --Brian McNeil / talk 15:30, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * +1, Brian - We're not OK or Hello. We should not have done this here.  With so many other organisations blogging like hell, this just makes us look like another fish in a huge bloody pond.  As you say, we're not a blog.  This does not belong on lead 1 by any means.  As soon as a proper story comes along, the Royal wedding thingy will likely get demoted. BarkingFish (talk) 15:41, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I see what you're both saying, and if I'm honest, I personally hate the term "live blog"—because it sounds like exactly that. What it actually is, though, is more "news live". Quite how the "live blog" term came about, I don't know, but it's very, very, inaccurate. Then again, though, anyone who thought it was a bad idea had more than two weeks to object, and no-one did.  wacky wace  15:43, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Actually, for two weeks, the apathy was deafening. Now, are you going to take the "celeb gossip" off 1st lead? --Brian McNeil / talk 16:14, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The "celeb gossip" thing, is best summed up I believe, in this comment from a British woman interviewed by ABC News about 2 or 3 days ago. Asked by the reporter what she thought of the Royal Wedding, this quaint, 70 year old woman replied "Who gives a toss? It's 2 young people getting married, it happens every day somewhere." :) BarkingFish (talk) 16:49, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Believe it or not, I am a republican and I think pretty much the same thing. The live blog is really because it is a massive event among most of the population and the world's media, but mainly because I wanted to test a new format for Wikinews.  wacky wace  16:57, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I think the live update format worked remarkably well. Let's face it, if we'd done this as a normal article we'd have had to wait until the event was over - and then probably wait several hours for it to be reviewed. By that time anyone remotely interested would have read all about it elsewhere. the wub "?!"  23:02, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Did anyone read this except the editors from wikinews? All the comments are from editors here. No comments from readers. 23:19, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * There are a couple of comments from IP editors on the Opinions tab. Unfortunately this article hasn't been showing on popular articles all day, this is almost certainly a bug. I'll try and dig into the raw stats log, see what I can find. the wub "?!"  23:48, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Ok. From 1000-1100 UTC when most of the ceremony took place this article got 284 hits, easily topping the popular articles for that hour (next was Steve Jobs denies 'location-gate' with 92). Probably more than normal were from Wikinews editors because of the editing activity, but that's still a pretty good figure. the wub "?!"  00:30, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Should have been failed
This article violates the Style Guide in numerous ways:
 * sources are cited inline rather than in a Sources section
 * the tone is heavily chatty and non-journalistic ("We now have a bit more on that bomb threat...")
 * there's no attempt to weed out significant facts from trivia (Jimbo moving an article is newsworthy?!)
 * the topic of the article jumps around (the issues regarding Syria and Bahrain should have been an article on their own)
 * the article is self-referential ("There's been some intense debate on the comments page over why the wedding should be such a major event.")

We've done live updates of breaking news right before. I refer you to the history of Canadian light aircraft stolen; Wisconsin State Capitol evacuated, which was continually updated as new information came in and remained a publishable article with multiple editors at all times. --Killing Vector (talk) 00:25, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
 * WN:IAR. As I said above, Wikinews isn't inventive enough—the live blog was a new format I felt deserved testing, and (if the reading figures are anything to go by) it went rather well.  wacky wace  10:58, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The very existence of Wikinews serves as proof that we, the community, feel hit count is not the sole or even the main indicator of quality. If it were, we'd be another hybrid tabloid-blog. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 11:02, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Perhaps not, but then again it also created interesting debate on the comments tab too, and even some controversy on here. I think that the reaction an article creates is perhaps the main indicator of how an article has done, and there has been a wide range of views expressed by Wikinewsies and our readers.  wacky wace  11:20, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't see a single comment that would not have been there if we had done live updates in a proper news style, instead of a blog. "Good morning and welcome to..." "...you can contact us with your opinions as the wedding progresses either on our website, or on Twitter or Facebook..." " We're just getting some breaking news..." - I could go on. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 17:27, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Sorry to be blunt. This does not belong on a news site. Rules (other than independent review) might be ignored for the sake of news, but this isn't news. --Pi zero (talk) 18:42, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Score 1 for common sense :) BarkingFish (talk) 18:44, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Sensationalism. That's what this is. アンパロ Io ti odio! 18:49, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
 * And so the Guardian, Metro, Channel 4 News, Telegraph, BBC, Independent, Sydney Morning Herald, Scotsman and NPR are also not news websites? I've said it before and I'll say it again: the live blog was a test for a new format which I thought would be more inventive than a simple article. If the community says they don't want me doing it again, I won't do it again.  wacky wace  18:59, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
 * From a logical point of view, "everyone else is doing it" is not a reason to do something. That's tu quoque. We should consider the merits of the article based on our own standards, not somebody else's. That's not to say I don't support the idea; actually, I think it's quite a nice innovation. It could have been a little more formal-sounding though, but I don't think this rises to the level of "bloggy news". Tempodivalse [talk]  20:18, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Unless you're gonna turn those live updates into an actual "news" article at the end of it, I would think you can probably take that as read. BarkingFish (talk) 19:02, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
 * It doesn't belong on a news site. Whether those other sites are exclusively news sites, and of what quality, depends on the choices they make.  For our part, we aspire to better.  --Pi zero (talk) 19:27, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
 * This is hilarious. So despite being a wiki, despite having all these opportunities to innovate, despite all the professional journalists and their great institutions having no qualms about taking advantage of new technologies, we're going to stubbornly stick to a rigid model based on "ink on paper". All on the pronouncement of a few amateurs about what they feel is news? the wub "?!"  19:41, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Is it clear to you that your last post is trolling? It should not be necessary to list the fallacies of reasoning in it; your own critical faculties should suffice.  Ask yourself seriously whether you want to believe the worst of Wikinews; if the answer is yes, and you still want to be helpful to Wikinews, perhaps recognizing that failing in your attitude will allow you over time to change it.  --Pi zero (talk) 20:18, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I agree that the article shouldn't have been published here. But then I am stupefyingly uninterested in celebrity news. My problem. But is this one article worth all the energy invested by the editors at this site in putting it down, when no one is writing and reviewing articles, supposedly the point of wikinews? Sometimes all this arguing just seems like more Wikipedia Review than a site dedicated to writing and publishing relevant news. Mattisse (talk) 20:41, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
 * It was not trolling, I am asking an honest question. What qualifies you to declare like this what is and isn't a "news" format? Live TV reporting is news no? So why is its equivalent in written words on a screen not? What makes you an arbiter, when countless respected professional (I mean professional in the sense that they do it for a living, and amateur in the sense that we are not paid - no judgement on who produces the better work) journalists and news organisations are embracing it? the wub "?!"  21:01, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
 * This is nothing to do with live reporting and everything to do with how it is written. The quotes I've picked out say it all. Live updates are wonderful. Blogs.... Well, blogs are cool too, but we are not a blog. The wedding disinterests me, but online I can at least choose not to read so I'm unconcerned by the subject, too - only the tone bothers me. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 21:04, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, that's a different matter and I agree that the tone was a little informal in places. the wub "?!"  21:24, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

I think 'live updates' are perfectly fine, since the changes (updates) are reviewed by another user. But this whole event is not news, not relevant, disregarding what people think, it's a wedding, that's all. Should we write on the wedding of the daughter of Barack Obama? (I know both of them are -18 years old, just to put an example) Maybe not. But this has been published, and the article is consistent IMO, though sometimes has "trivial" and "non newsworthy" bits, one of them (Mr. Wales moving the Wikipedia article) I removed by myself. I don't think this should not be encouraged, it is something very helpful, but the author of the article (or the community in general, if the article is edited by many: e.g. major event) should keep it updated. (I'm sorry if I keep repeating things, I'm not so good explaining :P) アンパロ Io ti odio! 20:46, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
 * ok, so let's move on. Mattisse (talk) 20:53, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

I think live updates ("liveblogging") is a good idea. I understand the opposition to it, but my idea of what Wikinews should be doing and where it should be going also varies from many other users', so whatevs. But we should be exploring these "alternative" routes; Wikinews is antiquated and too limited.  — fetch · comms  19:31, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

I agree with Fetchcomms and others: I don't think there is any problem with this kind of thing, and I approved a few pending changes to this. Let's take a few of the arguments:

 * 1) This isn't news, it's celebrity gossip. It actually is news. Someone who possibly could be the leader of a major Western nation has a full state wedding. That really is not in the same category as Paris Hilton flashing her knickers to some tabloid hacks to promote a reality show. As a British citizen, I'm not a big fan of the royals. But it has news value. All of the newspapers in Britain covered it including the quality papers like The Guardian. For Wikinews to not have covered it would have been quite inappropriate, even though personally I am no fan of the Royals. It isn't our place to reject news on the British monarchy because we dislike the fact that the Royal family are kind of like celebrities.
 * 2) Part of the problem with this is that being a celebrity doesn't make any coverage of you gossip. Steve Jobs pretty much has the status of a celebrity, but if Apple were to decide that they were going to buy Facebook or Twitter or a tech company or whatever, that would be news. Covering the Royal wedding isn't celebrity gossip even if obsessive reporting of the romance between the Prince and Ms Middleton before the wedding probably would have been celebrity gossip. Look at it in historical perspective: if Wikinews had been around in the 80s, would we have covered the marriage of Prince Charles and Diana? Would we have covered their divorce? Yes and yes. Would we have covered Diana's post-divorce revelations to Martin Bashir? Maybe not. This isn't gossip, it's a state occasion.
 * 3) If celebrity gossip is banned in a broad sense, we should probably stop sports coverage on Wikinews. As someone who doesn't care about sports, it is basically all mindless chatter about famous people. The news value of who wins the FA Cup or the NBA championships or whatever is pretty much zilch except for the fact that sports fans care about it, just like celebrity-obsessed people care about celebrities. Unlike, say, politics, military affairs, international diplomacy news, economic and business news, scientific discoveries and so on, who wins the Superbowl has little effect outside those who care. If you don't care about the Superbowl, it isn't particularly important. If you don't care about the economy, it will still affect your life when you can't get a job or can't start a business or whatever. Not caring about wars doesn't stop you from getting drafted or killed by a terrorist attack or whatever.
 * 4) Wikinews is not a blog. No, and this wasn't a "blog". Plenty of people in the Wikimedia community get their panties in a real bunch when they see the word "blog". But nobody quite explains what the problem with blogs are. But what a blog is isn't quite so easy to pin down. Some think of blogs as simply a reverse-chronological feed of stories. In which case, the latest news section on the Main Page is a blog. Some see it as anything which uses blogging software like  or  or . Obviously, that doesn't apply here. Others see it as some kind of personal diary. Again, not appropriate.
 * 5) The style is inappropriate. So fix it!

The current way of writing articles on Wikinews has the article as the basic unit. But there are plenty of events like the Royal wedding which happen which can't be adequately captured by an article. Some serious, major news outlets like and  are using live blog formats on their websites to cover events like this, but also for stories like election results. When the UK general election was going on, the negotiations between the three parties about forming a coalition government was the subject of many live blogs, and this made it a lot easier to follow the latest development. That wasn't celebrity gossip: that was working out who runs the country.

If people don't like the live blog format, we still need to work out an efficient and sensible way to provide continuing, quickly updated news coverage of live events if Wikinews wishes to become something approaching a useful news outlet. —Tom Morris (talk) 15:16, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

please add "royalty" category
editprotected Ragettho (talk) 04:28, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ Tyrol5 (talk) 20:28, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Image
Looks like the first image is deleted. Probably should be replaced with a new one. ― WIKI 151, taxi to runway 34R via Bravo.  06:44, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I've placed our missing image on it. Thanks for pointing it out. --Pi zero (talk) 16:27, 15 January 2021 (UTC)


text: Comments:Prince William marries Kate Middleton—live updates

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/


text:
Thread:Comments:Dingoes attack toddler on Fraser Island/Comments from feedback form - "An animal follows its natural ..."/reply (8)

I referred to this earlier. When an individual animal learns to victimize humans, it makes that individual animal especially dangerous. Pets are euthanized under similar circumstances.


text:
User talk:Christopher.akiki

-- 20:01, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Christopher.akiki


text:
User talk:Blister01

-- 20:12, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Blister01


text:
User talk:Teg Miles

-- 20:14, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Teg Miles


text:
User talk:Jonathanwirt

-- 20:22, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jonathanwirt


text:
User talk:Ruslant

-- 20:38, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ruslant


text:
User talk:MCflabbergasket

-- 20:43, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:MCflabbergasket


text:
User talk:Alanthwaits

-- 21:01, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Alanthwaits


text:
User talk:Quinn2go

-- 21:02, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Quinn2go


text:
User talk:Gutschi

-- 21:08, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gutschi


text:
User talk:An Seabhac

-- 21:20, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:An Seabhac


text:
User talk:HiuX

-- 21:38, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:HiuX


text:
User talk:FnH

-- 21:40, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:FnH


text:
User talk:Carxsca

-- 21:46, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Carxsca


text:
User talk:Anyasofiagomez

-- 21:55, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Anyasofiagomez


text:
User talk:Nadiaalwan

-- 21:58, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nadiaalwan


text:
User talk:Peva3

-- 21:59, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Peva3


text:
User talk:DrEcon

-- 22:43, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:DrEcon


text:
User talk:Headlesslouis

-- 22:46, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Headlesslouis


text:
User talk:Nacho cs

-- 22:48, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nacho cs


text:
User talk:XDDianaXD

-- 23:01, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:XDDianaXD


text:
User talk:Mouhahamadou Ndiaye

-- 23:27, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mouhahamadou Ndiaye


text:
User talk:Yiakos

-- 23:41, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Yiakos


text:
User talk:SusanH84

-- 23:46, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:SusanH84


text:
User talk:Martin brain

-- 23:49, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Martin brain


text:
Thread:Comments:Afghan pilot kills nine Americans/ 3 afghan/reply

I'm starting to get sick and tired of how we are viewed by the Afghans. We builded them roads, schools and are nation building, but when a asshole in america burns the Quran they go ape shit and kill 9 UN workers. But never say anything when the Taliban kills innocent people.


text:
User talk:Luisshaka

-- 00:02, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Luisshaka


text:
User talk:1jrotcmarines

-- 00:03, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:1jrotcmarines


text:
User talk:JCarl

-- 00:09, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:JCarl


text:
User talk:Baureth

-- 00:10, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Baureth


text:
User talk:24.121.233.47

 Nascar 1996  (talk • contribs) 00:10, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:24.121.233.47


text:
User talk:DAIRY FERNADEZ

-- 00:20, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:DAIRY FERNADEZ


text:
User talk:Custodiensveritatem

-- 00:35, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Custodiensveritatem


text:
User talk:Thanhtoanpro1988

-- 00:53, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Thanhtoanpro1988


text:
User talk:HylianBlue

-- 01:09, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:HylianBlue


text:
User talk:Giovanigruporamone

-- 01:25, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Giovanigruporamone


text:
User talk:Zlowry21

-- 01:30, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Zlowry21


text:
User talk:Alannashae

-- 01:35, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Alannashae


text:
User talk:Krockblt515

-- 01:38, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Krockblt515


text:
User talk:Maycrying

-- 01:42, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Maycrying


text:
User talk:Tyson, TX

-- 01:48, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tyson, TX


text:
User talk:Aswn

-- 02:03, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Aswn


text:
User talk:Sandro david

-- 02:13, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sandro david


text:
User talk:Rauito11

-- 02:18, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rauito11


text:
User talk:Giuseppe cartagena

-- 02:30, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Giuseppe cartagena


text:
User talk:NNin022

-- 02:48, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:NNin022


text:
Thread:Comments:U.S. Coast Guard investigation finds 'poor safety culture' contributed to Deepwater Horizon disaster/Are we surprised?/reply

No, and what's worse is that almost certantly, there are hundreds more facilities (not just rigs) that have just as bad, if not worse safety levels. It's the apocolypse waiting to happen.


text:
Thread:Comments:Qur'an-burning pastor jailed after mosque protest barred/Comments from feedback form - "With so much at stake & everyt..."/reply (27)

Depending on your perspective, there are still atrocities committed in the name of Christianity today. (I'm atheist, if you must know, not that this should change things, I'm merely making a point).

In your style:

While I wait for someone to flame me for being a "gay, commie, hippy dissident", I'll return to my...uh, glass of water.


text:
User talk:Fuxx

-- 04:48, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Fuxx


text:
Sixteen killed in Marrakech, Morocco bomb blast

April 30, 2011 At least sixteen people are reported killed in a terrorist bombing in the city of, Morocco. The bombing occurred in the busy Argana café before lunch time, Thursday. The café, located in the popular square, is within what is known as the. The square, a  and one of the country's top tourist attractions, draws many foreign visitors.

Early reports blamed a gas can catching fire. Witness reports indicate the blast destroyed the entire second floor of the café, blasting off the terrace and roof demolishing the front of the building.

Photographer Tarek Bozid reported, "Everything was covered in blood. The scene was horrifying. Tables were broken and glass was shattered." Ten of the victims were foreign, including six French nationals and one Briton. Half of the dead are reported to be women; and, at least 20 other people were critically wounded including a number foreigners. Two Swiss nationals, two Russians, two Tunisians and two Dutch tourists are reported to be amongst those injured.

Although the blast was at first considered an accident, the Interior Ministry confirmed it was an intentional act. "Analysis of the early evidence collected at the site of the blast confirms the theory of an attack," he said in a statement issued through the official (MAP) news agency.

Medics said nails, often used in suicide bombs, were found in the bodies of most victims.

French President has expressed his outrage, considering it to be "heinous, cruel and cowardly". The act has been condemned by leaders internationally. French foreign minister stated he is unaware of any particular threat to France in Morroco, once a French protectorate.

This is the first major attack on Morocco since the, which killed 45 and injured more than 100.


text:
User talk:Ashwinkartheeban

-- 04:52, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ashwinkartheeban


text:
User talk:Ivan De Zorzi

-- 04:57, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ivan De Zorzi


text:
User talk:Pgncmb

-- 05:29, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Pgncmb


text:
User talk:Георгий Долгопский

-- 05:46, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Георгий Долгопский


text:
User talk:Casperruegg

-- 05:52, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Casperruegg


text:
User talk:Prat.bpl

-- 05:58, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Prat.bpl


text:
User talk:Samuraiadam17

-- 06:11, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Samuraiadam17


text:
User talk:Pareshnpatel

-- 06:17, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Pareshnpatel


text:
User talk:Michael Brent

-- 06:21, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Michael Brent


text:
User talk:AmroAlaa

-- 06:22, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:AmroAlaa


text:
User talk:KatyOhara

-- 06:29, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:KatyOhara


text:
User talk:Zulfan Amanu

-- 06:32, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Zulfan Amanu


text:
User talk:Gntghwx

-- 06:39, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gntghwx


text:
User talk:Mranan1508

-- 07:07, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mranan1508


text:
User talk:L0ll0

-- 07:26, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:L0ll0


text:
User talk:Caleb Elliott

-- 07:40, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Caleb Elliott


text:
Talk:Sixteen killed in Marrakech, Morocco bomb blast

Note to Matisse
I undid one of your revisions, just to restore the map, but I did re-do your correction about the number of victims. I also fixed the layout so your photo has top billing. Tadpole256 (talk) 13:34, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

I also restored your fix to the date formatting in the sources. Tadpole256 (talk) 13:52, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

 * Well, I had to redo it, as when I looked at the article the date mess up was still there. So I did it again. And you did not replace the updated source for the "sixteen" killed which I had to redo. I was replacing the map, as it was accidentally when my account logged out, but got an edit conflict. Please do not revert without a real reason. Adding back a map is not a reason, IMO. Mattisse (talk) 13:58, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Point taken. Tadpole256 (talk) 14:09, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Note to Tadpole
I was adding the map again when I got an edit conflict. Unfortunately, you reverted my updated sources as well as fixes I had made to the article. My removal of the map was due to an accidental log out. Please in the future do not revert, as I had to redo my constructive changes. You could have just put the map back without reverting. Mattisse (talk) 13:39, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

 * Sorry about that, I had not realized how many changes you made at once until I looked again. I thought you had just removed the map in favor of the picture, and updated the body count, so it seemed easier to "undo" (just one click), and then type the number six. I'll be more careful next time.

 * As a side note, I typically try to make a lot of small edits, so that individual edits can be easily reverted, and also to help prevent major loss when my system craps the bed and accidentally logs me out.Tadpole256 (talk) 13:56, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

 * The map was not there when I added the picture.

 * Also, if you make "lots of little edits" you should refrain from editing when another editor is doing so. Else edit conflicts and frustration are inevitable. Mattisse (talk) 14:02, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I agree, but you'll note, I started working on this story first, and I am still making revisions. If you'd like to take a break until I am done, it might avoid some confusion. I will be done soon, I am at work right now and intend to head home soon, so you can have at it then if you'd like. Tadpole256 (talk) 14:11, 29 April 2011 (UTC)


text:
User talk:Paulescu Viorel

-- 08:09, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Paulescu Viorel


text:
User talk:Dkbabi

-- 08:14, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dkbabi


text:
User talk:Thirumurugun

-- 08:31, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Thirumurugun


text:
User talk:Ananda.datta

-- 08:55, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ananda.datta


text:
User talk:Triple sport

-- 09:19, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Triple sport


text: Talk:Steve Jobs denies 'location-gate'

title: Talk:Steve Jobs denies 'location-gate'


text: Comments:Steve Jobs denies 'location-gate'


text:
User talk:לינדה סנדר

-- 09:35, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:לינדה סנדר


text:
User talk:Casber 7979

-- 09:50, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Casber 7979


text:
Category:User eo-3

de:Kategorie:User eo-3 eo:Kategorio:Uzanto eo-3

title: Category:User eo-3


text:
User talk:Thomas Spooner

-- 09:53, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Thomas Spooner


text:
User talk:Iranbro

-- 09:59, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Iranbro


text:
User talk:Sakhioba

-- 09:59, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sakhioba


text:
User talk:Merasangeet

-- 10:12, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Merasangeet


text:
User talk:Turos

-- 10:34, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Turos


text:
User talk:Zdorikov

-- 10:49, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Zdorikov


text:
User talk:Vukašin

-- 11:13, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Vukašin


text:
User talk:Sathyasryan~enwikinews

-- 11:14, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Sathyasryan. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Sathyasryan~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:28, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:36, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sathyasryan~enwikinews


text:
User talk:Nikiboz

-- 11:51, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nikiboz


text:
User talk:Lyokonex

-- 11:54, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lyokonex


text:
User talk:Natalie pocha

-- 11:56, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Natalie pocha


text:
User talk:Ant682

-- 11:58, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ant682


text:
User talk:Mthistleton

-- 12:24, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mthistleton


text:
User talk:Iceland-fix

-- 12:35, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Iceland-fix


text:
Thread:Comments:Prince William marries Kate Middleton—live updates/Baffling

I will never understand the world's obsession with these affairs... There are three wars going on, UK, NATO & US service men and women are fighting and dying around the globe, and we are all swooning over some tart's dress... What a pity. Such is the human condition I suppose.
 * [Re-added as a thread by Brian McNeil.]


text:
Thread:Comments:Prince William marries Kate Middleton—live updates/Baffling/reply

I agree with this poast!


text:
User talk:Au24

-- 12:43, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Au24


text:
User talk:Generalxp

-- 12:46, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Generalxp


text:
Thread:Comments:Prince William marries Kate Middleton—live updates/Baffling/reply (2)

I agree also.


text:
User talk:NotDifficult

-- 12:50, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:NotDifficult


text:
Thread:Comments:Qur'an-burning pastor jailed after mosque protest barred/Comments from feedback form - "With so much at stake & everyt..."/reply (28)

This article has to do with the constitutional right to free speech. Judgments about the merits of religion or particular religions are not the issue. Free speech is a constitutional right on any issue, except the example of yelling "Fire" in a crowded theater.


text:
User talk:Astropro

-- 13:09, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Astropro


text:
User talk:Rebberfoon

-- 13:32, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rebberfoon


text:
Thread:Comments:Prince William marries Kate Middleton—live updates/Baffling/reply (3)

Yup:P. It's weird. I've gotten to the point where I unplug the radio at work the moment they start to mention the royal wedding.


text:
User talk:Davichito32

-- 13:40, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Davichito32


text:
Thread:Comments:Qur'an-burning pastor jailed after mosque protest barred/Comments from feedback form - "With so much at stake & everyt..."/reply (29)

I agree. Both sides are being stupid here. I've been reading about Terry Jones for years (?) now, and he's an idiot. But that doesn't stop the fact that he shouldn't be forcibly silenced. When you do that you merely drive unpopular opinions and prejudices underground where they can fester and mutate into something truly horrible.


text:
User talk:Матвій Мирослав

-- 13:44, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Матвій Мирослав


text:
User talk:Bojan3331

-- 13:48, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bojan3331


text:
Thread:Comments:Prince William marries Kate Middleton—live updates/Baffling/reply (4)

At least it isn't another Fergie!

"Here comes the bride! Forty feet wide".


text:
Thread:Comments:Prince William marries Kate Middleton—live updates/Baffling/reply (5)

Well, the BBC World on the radio said the coverage of the bride was a classier version of Paris Hilton, meaning it was a "celebrity" story and not "news".

Edited twice by to remove the w call.


text:
User talk:杭州力强

-- 13:53, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:杭州力强


text:
Thread:Comments:Steve Jobs denies 'location-gate'/Ugh

Dear America,

'Gate' is a word referring to a gap in a wall or fence. It's only relation to scandals is that it partially comprised the proper noun name of a hotel where a scandal once took place. Slapping gate at the end of a bunch of different words makes us all look retarded. Thank you.


text:
User talk:Ventus55

-- 14:00, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ventus55


text:
User talk:Basia-92

-- 14:02, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Basia-92


text:
User talk:Pablo 1234

-- 14:05, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Pablo 1234


text:
User talk:Jfive490

-- 14:11, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jfive490


text:
User talk:Godfreysang

-- 14:21, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Godfreysang


text:
Thread:Comments:Prince William marries Kate Middleton—live updates/Baffling/reply (6)

Don't get me wrong, I understand that the wedding of any head-of-state (or equivalent) will make the news, but this week long non-stop coverage is simply insane. The other thing I don't undersatand is why Americans care so much! We fought a revolution to get out from under a crown, and now we seem simply enamoured with it. It's all bollocks if you ask me. Tadpole256 (talk) 14:26, 29 April 2011 (UTC)


text:
User talk:Scuby~enwikinews

-- 14:28, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Scuby. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Scuby~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:21, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:36, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Scuby~enwikinews


text:
Thread:Comments:Prince William marries Kate Middleton—live updates/Baffling/reply (7)

Actually it seems that the United States is more interested in the wedding than the British themselves.


text:
Thread:Comments:Prince William marries Kate Middleton—live updates/Baffling/reply (8)

I know! And that's what baffles me. The average American doesn't know the first thing about how the Brittish Monarchy works, yet for some reason, our women are just going bonkers over this wedding. Why?!Tadpole256 (talk) 14:35, 29 April 2011 (UTC)


text:
Thread:Comments:Prince William marries Kate Middleton—live updates/Baffling/reply (9)

Your average American actually wants royalty.

So,... Make us an offer for the Sax-Coburgs; we'll keep the jewels to sell to cash4gold.com, you take the Germans and the Greek.


text:
Thread:Comments:Prince William marries Kate Middleton—live updates/Baffling/reply (10)

Indeed it is. As someone from Britain who went on holiday to New York last week, I can tell you they're incredibly crazy—certainly more so—than the British. I would imagine this is because the idea of a monarchy is something incredibly exciting since they don't have one, and the stereotypical 'Englishness' of the event—the Abbey, the cavalry, the carriages—gets them excited.


text:
Thread:Comments:Prince William marries Kate Middleton—live updates/Baffling/reply (11)

Probably because it seems like a fairy tale.


text:
Thread:Comments:Prince William marries Kate Middleton—live updates/Baffling/reply (12)

Now that's funny!


text:
Thread:Comments:Prince William marries Kate Middleton—live updates/Baffling/reply (13)

I have a feeling you are spot-on. I think it all seems so old fashioned and romantic to most Americans. Frankly, it seems like a collosal waste of money and resources to me.


text:
User talk:Umer sharif club

-- 14:47, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Umer sharif club


text:
Thread:Comments:Prince William marries Kate Middleton—live updates/Comments from feedback form - "Hundreds of thousands of peopl..."

Hundreds of thousands of people flocking to London today? That should help prop up the British economy... maybe that would offset the costs of such an unnecessarily lavish event?


text:
Thread:Comments:US Federal Reserve Chairman gives first news conference/Comments from feedback form - "I hope the Fed can maintain no..."

I hope the Fed can maintain non-partisanship while increasing transparency at the same time


text:
User talk:Omkar

-- 15:03, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Omkar


text:
User talk:TimothyTo

-- 15:06, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:TimothyTo


text:
User talk:Orlandino Lopes Cardoso

-- 15:10, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Orlandino Lopes Cardoso


text:
User talk:Sec.tek

-- 15:11, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sec.tek


text:
User talk:Vinesh pushparjunan

-- 15:12, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Vinesh pushparjunan


text:
User talk:Blue Hoopy Frood

-- 15:27, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Blue Hoopy Frood


text:
User talk:Kaydub04

-- 15:34, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kaydub04


text: Comments:Deadly tornadoes rip through southern US, killing over 300


text:
User talk:Mahakbhushan

-- 15:41, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mahakbhushan


text:
User talk:Setiawan.Shi

-- 15:45, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Setiawan.Shi


text:
User talk:Hulkalexis

-- 15:45, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hulkalexis


text:
User talk:Saeedprinceman

-- 15:57, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Saeedprinceman


text:
User talk:TheBeppe

-- 16:02, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:TheBeppe


text:
Thread:Comments:Deadly tornadoes rip through southern US, killing close to 300/Comments from feedback form - "Well done Matisse!!!"

Well done Matisse!!!


text:
User talk:Elbananas65

-- 16:16, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Elbananas65


text:
User talk:Leta1000flowersbloom

-- 16:41, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Leta1000flowersbloom


text:
User talk:Sandydandu

-- 16:43, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sandydandu


text:
Thread:Comments:Prince William marries Kate Middleton—live updates/The right idea

This made me smile.


text:
User talk:Jara99

-- 16:54, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jara99


text:
User talk:Gianfranco34

-- 16:58, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gianfranco34


text:
User talk:TerryDu

-- 16:59, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:TerryDu


text:
Thread:Comments:Prince William marries Kate Middleton—live updates/The right idea/reply

Thats funny.


text:
User talk:Abe elsker

-- 17:02, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Abe elsker


text:
User talk:JV029Finna

-- 17:02, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:JV029Finna


text:
User talk:Gwn2985

-- 17:06, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gwn2985


text:
User talk:Javiergil73

-- 17:08, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Javiergil73


text:
User talk:Умар Нальгиев

-- 17:11, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Умар Нальгиев


text:
User talk:Versegirolanddsdsf

-- 17:13, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Versegirolanddsdsf


text:
User talk:Oleh Nemchinov

-- 17:14, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Oleh Nemchinov


text:
User talk:E7Paul

-- 17:25, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:E7Paul


text:
Thread:Comments:Prince William marries Kate Middleton—live updates/MIERDA

This is complete shit. Who in the first place "appointed" the Kings and Queens of Europe and the other monarchic lands? Maybe somebody clever enough to piss over everyone and say "I am the King! Goo goo G'job!" thousands of years ago, then the "royal" descendants continued with the great lie, and no plebe opposed to this (nobody but France). I don't see the point of monarchic governments. Even the King of Spain seems awkward.


text:
User talk:Thelmanaya

-- 17:48, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Thelmanaya


text:
User talk:Astridrobert

-- 17:52, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Astridrobert


text:
User talk:Mandana-rz

-- 17:58, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mandana-rz


text:
User talk:Lorenzo Freschi

-- 18:06, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lorenzo Freschi


text:
User:Earthsound

Historically, I've contributed mostly to the en-version of Wikipedia as user earthsound.

Detailed info:
 * all wiki contributions
 * wikipedia edit counter
 * commons edit counter
 * commons uploads detailed information

title: User:Earthsound


text:
User talk:Kannaduki

-- 18:21, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kannaduki


text:
User talk:Music+mas

-- 18:37, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Music+mas


text:
User talk:8ppurble

-- 18:41, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:8ppurble


text:
User talk:Jrbowie

-- 19:11, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jrbowie


text:
User talk:Sabre ball

-- 19:29, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sabre ball


text:
Thread:Comments:Prince William marries Kate Middleton—live updates/Baffling/reply (14)

It's doing no harm. These people get a nice wedding, and the tourist industry will get a boost. I would be very surprised indeed if, in total, the tourist income from the event were less than the cost of the event itself.

To be honest, this is one of the nicer ways we could spend taxpayers money - I'd rather this than spending it on MPs' expenses, bankers' bonuses, or killing people in the Middle East.

I've always been of the opinion that the royals do little good, but certainly no harm. They attract tourists, and would hopefully act as a last resort to block a total government takeover by a lunatic - I doubt the queen would give assent to that - but that's an unlikely event. But tourism gets a boost. And since my town was built entirely out of fish and tourists, I'm not going to say anything bad about tourism ;-)


text:
User talk:LEONARD-HOFSTADTER

-- 19:53, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:LEONARD-HOFSTADTER


text:
User talk:Taktstöcke

-- 19:58, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Taktstöcke


text:
User talk:Chlsjns0

-- 20:09, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Chlsjns0


text:
User talk:Elhermiñato

-- 20:32, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Elhermiñato


text:
Thread:Comments:Prince William marries Kate Middleton—live updates/Baffling/reply (15)

To quote Dendodge: "To be honest, this is one of the nicer ways we could spend taxpayers money" - Yes, it is. But approximately £5 Billion pounds worth of it? On a wedding between 2 young people, in a time when Britain is supposed to be going through "austerity" measures? Fuck that for a lark.

They'd have been just as well finding a registry office, or buggering off to Gretna Green than wasting all that money on an event which is gonna give absolutely cack all back to the people.

The taxpayer gets the bill, the businesses get the profit. We won't see a penny of what's made from today's extravagorgeout.


text:
User talk:Mbowlersr

-- 20:35, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mbowlersr


text:
User talk:Schnubbi2583

-- 20:40, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Schnubbi2583


text:
User talk:Lifeinsurance10

-- 20:43, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lifeinsurance10


text:
Swiss mountaineer Erhard Loretan dies in climbing accident

April 30, 2011 Acclaimed Swiss mountaineer died Thursday on his 52nd birthday  when he fell in a climbing accident.

According to Swiss police, Loretan was climbing with a client to the summit of, a 4,043 meter peak in the , when both fell for unknown reasons from a height of around 3,800 metres. He was killed immediately while his client was hospitalized in serious condition.

Loretan, originally from, was eleven years old when he began climbing. In 1982, he climbed his first 8,000-meter peak,   in Pakistan. He was the third person to summit all fourteen of the world's, which he accomplished by the age of 36. This confirmed his reputation as one of the world's top mountain climbers. In 1986 he ascended in 40 hours without using supplementary oxygen, a feat that astonished other mountain climbers.

Saying that he was essentially a solitary person, he told a film festival in a video posted on its web site last year, "First of all I’d like to thank the mountains, for almost 40 years they have allowed me to climb, and with this passion I’ve lived an extraordinary life up to now, that’s why I’d like to thank them."

He added, "I now want to share this passion more with others, and it’s because of this that being a is a good profession because you can help someone who dreams about climbing mountains. This is something very beautiful."

In 2001 his personal life was marred by a charge  for  his seven-month old son to stop him from crying. He plead guilty in 2003 and received a four-month suspended sentence. The case ignited a debate in Switzerland over shaking babies.


text:
Thread:Comments:Prince William marries Kate Middleton—live updates/MIERDA/reply

+1 Diego, I couldn't have put it better myself. Mierda just about describes the whole thing we saw today. Nothing calls for a wedding that lavish and outstandingly expensive. Monarchy is a joke. Let's go the Irish route, President and a PM.


text:
User:Isarra/glarp

 Related news Category: on Wikinews

 category=Published category= notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true count=10  Collaborate!
 * Newsroom
 * Style Guide - how to write
 * Content Guide - what to write

title: User:Isarra/glarp


text:
Thread:Comments:Prince William marries Kate Middleton—live updates/Comments from feedback form - "So far the entire presentation..."

So far the entire presentation is Wonderful!


text:
Thread:Comments:U.S. President Barack Obama releases original birth certificate/Comments from feedback form - "WOW!!"

WOW!!


text:
User talk:Alexey2244

-- 21:36, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Alexey2244


text:
User talk:Alexmalka

-- 21:54, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Alexmalka


text:
Thread:Comments:Prince William marries Kate Middleton—live updates/Baffling/reply (16)

£5 billion? I don't know the actual cost, but it can't have been anything near that high. Taxpayer's money was only paying for security and transport, the rest was covered by the families. I do know that the cost of security for the Pope's visit last year was about £10 million, and security for the 2009 G20 hobnob in London was roughly £7 million. The wedding would surely be a similar order of magnitude.

There may also be a loss to the total economy because of the extra bank holiday, but how much (and whether it is countered by extra tourism, memorabilia etc.) is a matter of debate: http://blogs.wsj.com/numbersguy/how-much-did-royal-wedding-cost-britain-1055/


text:
Thread:Comments:Prince William marries Kate Middleton—live updates/MIERDA/reply (2)

I can't speak for the other countries, but Britain's a constitutional monarchy Diego, and they do rule with the consent of the people. Perhaps not all of the people, but certainly a majority - polls on this are pretty regular and hover at around 70%.

And the royal succession in Britain isn't as simple as you might think. Several times Parliament has stepped in to influence it - the Restoration, Glorious Revolution, and abdication of Edward VIII spring to mind.


text:
User talk:Lipik

-- 22:59, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lipik


text:
User talk:Famedog

-- 23:14, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Famedog


text:
User talk:RDAndrew

-- 23:21, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:RDAndrew


text:
User talk:Jameme01

-- 23:33, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jameme01


text:
Thread:Comments:U.S. President Barack Obama releases original birth certificate/This is a Joke

Even this will not be enough for the nut job right wing in the US they just can't get over a Black Democrat winning the election. Of course what do you expect from people who think giving tax breaks to company's that ship jobs overseas will create jobs here.


text:
User talk:Gustavodehierro

-- 23:58, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gustavodehierro


text: Comments:Sixteen killed in Marrakech, Morocco bomb blast


text:
Thread:Comments:Prince William marries Kate Middleton—live updates/MIERDA/reply (3)

Brits are stupid then (no offense intended, though). Do it the French way!


text:
User talk:MetaCow

-- 00:35, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:MetaCow


text: User talk:Ghhgjjf

title: User talk:Ghhgjjf


text:
User talk:76.124.108.129

--Killing Vector (talk) 00:37, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:76.124.108.129


text:
User talk:Vnw1951

-- 00:41, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Vnw1951


text:
Thread:Comments:Prince William marries Kate Middleton—live updates/MIERDA/reply (4)

Been there, done that. Ended up with Cromwell et al, who did such wonderful things as genocide in Ireland, and cancelling Christmas (seriously).


text:
User talk:几份几

-- 00:51, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:几份几


text:
User talk:Poleball

-- 00:53, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Poleball


text:
User talk:Franz731

-- 00:57, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Franz731


text:
User talk:GaboxUnderwave

-- 01:32, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:GaboxUnderwave


text:
User talk:Reeve.pete

-- 02:15, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Reeve.pete


text:
User talk:Nrwillia1

-- 02:21, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nrwillia1


text:
User talk:Mackdaddybj

-- 02:36, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mackdaddybj


text:
Thread:Comments:U.S. President Barack Obama releases original birth certificate/Oh goody, he released his birth certificate

Like that would actually shut the birthers up. LOL. But then again, what do you expect?


text:
User talk:Ineamer

-- 03:10, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ineamer


text:
User talk:Zoleka montgomery

-- 03:13, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Zoleka montgomery


text:
User talk:Sandrocomini

-- 03:38, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sandrocomini


text:
Australian cadets face charges over sex abuse

May 2, 2011 (ADFA) cadets Daniel McDonald, 19, and Dylan De Blaquiere, 18, were arrested and appeared in court Friday after allegations were made that they filmed a female cadet having sex and then broadcasted it over the internet, lying about it afterwards. They were released on bail.

The female complainant, 18, stated that while the sex was consensual, the transmission via the chat host Skype to another room on the grounds of the academy, was done without her knowledge. In addition, she stated that photos were taken and "distributed to other people."

Police allege that on March 29, the footage captured on Mr. McDonald's webcam was sent via Skype to Mr. De Blaquiere's room where he and five other cadets watched the stream on a laptop computer. McDonald told De Blaquiere in advance. Police say De Blaquiere sent a text message to McDonald saying, "I just had a fuckin sick idea pop into my head, fuck her n film it." The friend replied, "Oh friggen hell is she aware of this or not?" McDonald's answer was "Nope."

Mr McDonald said in a Facebook chat with another friend: "I'm about to root a girl n have webcam set up to the boys in another room."

McDonald's attorney applied for a suppression order in court yesterday to protect Mr McDonald’s name for reasons of national security, but was the request was denied.

The two cadets now face charges of using a "" to offend. McDonald faces a further charge of committing an act of indecency without consent which carries a maximum penalty of a five-year jail term.

Bail has been granted for both men under provisions they do not contact the complainant or any witnesses involved with the case outside regular ADFA classes.

When the complainant went public with her allegation, there was a flood of anger from the public. The Australian government in connection with the has responded by launching of a series of investigations into the treatment of women in military service, including systematic  and  that could reach the point of sexual assault.

The ADFA is considering taking action against the two cadets charged in this case, including possible suspension.


text:
User talk:Aditya don

-- 04:02, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Aditya don


text:
Thread:Comments:Afghan pilot kills nine Americans/Comments from feedback form - "It's sad to see soldiers being..."

It's sad to see soldiers being attacked by those we least expect :'(


text:
User talk:Gonzologic

-- 04:04, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gonzologic


text: Talk:Swiss mountaineer Erhard Loretan dies in climbing accident


text: Comments:Swiss mountaineer Erhard Loretan dies in climbing accident


text:
Thread:Comments:Deadly tornadoes rip through southern US, killing over 300/Comments from feedback form - "Was Canada affected at all? I'..."

Was Canada affected at all? I'm wondering because I see that the NOAA map doesn't depict tornado probability in Canada, but the article states that tornados were spotted as up north as New York!


text:
User talk:Donpakistan

-- 04:23, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Donpakistan


text:
User talk:Ataraxy22

-- 04:32, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ataraxy22


text:
User talk:Nasqn

-- 04:53, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nasqn


text:
User talk:Nogueiravictor

-- 04:59, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nogueiravictor


text:
User talk:Haumonxuytuyet

-- 05:02, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Haumonxuytuyet


text:
User talk:Thinkwikipark

-- 05:34, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Thinkwikipark


text:
User talk:Владимир Крипак

-- 05:45, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Владимир Крипак


text:
User talk:Xhoonacker

-- 06:06, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Xhoonacker


text:
User talk:紫色的瞳孔

-- 06:26, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:紫色的瞳孔


text:
User talk:Creditcardscomparecreditcards

-- 06:47, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Creditcardscomparecreditcards


text:
User talk:Edp318

-- 06:52, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Edp318


text:
Thread:Comments:Prince William marries Kate Middleton—live updates/Congrats!

Regardless of whether you think the media attention or cost is warranted, I think we should all wish the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge a happy and long-lasting marriage!


text:
Thread:Comments:Schoolboy dies in Gaza after bus hit by rockets/Tragedy/Another Reason/reply (10)

It did spring to my mind. As a hoax. http://honestreporting.com/red-cross-ambulance-libel-exposed-2/


text:
Thread:Comments:Schoolboy dies in Gaza after bus hit by rockets/Tragedy/Another Reason/reply (11)

Um... That's not the definition I know. Using violence or threats thereof to intimidate or coerce? That also applies to all actual fighting.


text:
Thread:Comments:Swiss mountaineer Erhard Loretan dies in climbing accident/Shaking babies?

Yikes! I'm surprised he got a four-month sentence!


text:
User talk:Td2seven1

-- 07:28, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Td2seven1


text:
User talk:Summitbisht01

-- 07:31, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Summitbisht01


text:
User talk:Ravikant.parmar

-- 07:44, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ravikant.parmar


text:
User talk:Dydyavatar

-- 07:46, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dydyavatar


text:
User talk:Paumel

-- 08:07, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Paumel


text:
User talk:富士光明幼稚園

-- 08:37, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:富士光明幼稚園


text:
User talk:Sun5449

-- 08:42, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sun5449


text:
User talk:Arn2012

-- 08:50, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Arn2012


text:
User talk:Shahedaayub

-- 08:50, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Shahedaayub


text:
User talk:Vpelleg

-- 09:18, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Vpelleg


text:
User talk:Der Rechercheur

-- 09:45, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Der Rechercheur


text:
User talk:Sugaspott

-- 09:59, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sugaspott


text:
User talk:Melis burak

-- 10:05, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Melis burak


text:
User talk:Arneg711

-- 10:09, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Arneg711


text:
User talk:Eken7

-- 10:12, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Eken7


text:
User talk:واعظي

-- 10:13, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:واعظي


text:
Thread:Comments:Schoolboy dies in Gaza after bus hit by rockets/Tragedy/Another Reason/reply (12)

I see no evidence of rusting on the areas that have been peeled out i.e. the areas that would be freshly exposed after the blast. I see plenty of rust on the roof, including the areas that have been folded inwards (I've seen the term "blast petaling" in reference to petals peeling from a flower) - all that indicates to me is that local Red Cross ambulances are rusted to bits and the paintwork is peeling.


text:
User talk:Szenti Tamás

-- 10:41, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Szenti Tamás


text:
User talk:Akiwifi

-- 10:53, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Akiwifi


text:
User talk:FARIZASAFAR

-- 10:53, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:FARIZASAFAR


text:
User talk:Renzolorenzo89

-- 11:23, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Renzolorenzo89


text:
User talk:RichardGHP

-- 11:26, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:RichardGHP


text:
User talk:Carina Lanchine

-- 11:28, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Carina Lanchine


text:
User talk:Monu1618

-- 11:30, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Monu1618


text: User:TITT!ES ON F!RE

title: User:TITT!ES ON F!RE


text: User:KITT!ES ON F!RE

title: User:KITT!ES ON F!RE


text: User:K!ttensonf!re

title: User:K!ttensonf!re


title: User:Cheaptiffany14


title: User:Cheaptiffany13


title: User:Cheaptiffany12


title: User:Cheaptiffany11


text: User:LarryTheDolphin

title: User:LarryTheDolphin


text: User:K!ttiesonf!reRELOADED

title: User:K!ttiesonf!reRELOADED


text: User:Bunnies on f!re

title: User:Bunnies on f!re


title: User:Kittiesonfire8


title: User:Kittiesonfire9


text: User:DiarrheaMilkshake

title: User:DiarrheaMilkshake


title: User:Kittiesonfire6


title: User:Kittiesonfire7


title: User:Kittiesonfire16


title: User:Kittiesonfire17


title: User:Kittiesonfire18


text: User:PeeOnFavonian

title: User:PeeOnFavonian


title: User:Kittiesonfire21


title: User:Kittiesonfire22


title: User:Kittiesonfire20


title: User:Kittiesonfire24


title: User:Kittiesonfire25


title: User:Kittiesonfire23


title: User:Kittiesonfire19


text: User:K!ttiesonf!re

title: User:K!ttiesonf!re


text: User:My name is awesome

title: User:My name is awesome


text: User:I set my dick on fire!

title: User:I set my dick on fire!


text: User:I set my friends on fire!

title: User:I set my friends on fire!


title: User:Kitties-On-Fire2


title: User:Kitties-On-Fire3


title: User:Kitties-On-Fire4


title: User:Kitties-On-Fire8000


text: User:Kitties-On-Fire-Extreme

title: User:Kitties-On-Fire-Extreme


title: User:Kittiesonfirre5000


title: User:Kittiesonfire2000


title: User:Kittiesonfire3000


title: User:Kittiesonfire4000


title: User:Kittiesonfire15


title: User:Kittiesonfire10


title: User:Kittiesonfire12


title: User:Kittiesonfire13


title: User:Kittiesonfire11


title: User:Kittiesonfire14


title: User:Kittiesonfire5


text:
User talk:Sarin777

-- 11:52, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sarin777


text:
User talk:Ltdhking

-- 11:54, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ltdhking


text:
Category:Sockpuppets of Kittiesonfire5

NOTE: Kittiesonfire = ✅ as Dantherocker1 on en.wikipedia. Please re-tag accordingly to keep Dantherocker1 as the master sock.

Confirmed, and suspected, sockpuppets of.

title: Category:Sockpuppets of Kittiesonfire5


text:
User talk:Laxrangan

-- 12:07, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Laxrangan


text:
User talk:Venkat.voruganti

-- 12:14, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Venkat.voruganti


text:
User talk:Ms.mwazy

-- 12:23, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ms.mwazy


text:
User talk:North8000

-- 12:36, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:North8000


text:
User talk:Kagoma01

-- 13:14, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kagoma01


text:
User talk:Turtwigrules

-- 13:24, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Turtwigrules


text:
User talk:Antilumpen

-- 13:29, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Antilumpen


text:
Thread:Comments:Steve Jobs denies 'location-gate'/It shouldn't have to be said, but . .

All this marvelous technology that we use to communicate information between ourselves is also communicating information ABOUT ourselves. More and more criminals and swindlers (as if they aren't one and the same) are learning how to gain access to that information, especially when we are broadcasting it through the air like CNN. Let's stop rushing to get the latest high-tech gadget that the manufacturers are working so hard to convince us that we just must have. I still don't have a cell phone, because I don't feel I really need one. Perhaps more of us should use that criteria before jumping on the latest band wagon. DO we really need it?


text:
Thread:Comments:Prince William marries Kate Middleton—live updates/Disappointing...

I am quite disappointed that we went through so much trouble to do a "live update" article on the royal wedding. It was a wedding. That's all. No one walked away from the alter etc. This was totally a non-news event. There were/are more important things going on in the world, and we wasted our time with this. So disappointed.


text:
User talk:Melwdos

-- 14:21, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Melwdos


text:
User talk:David George Leslie

-- 14:33, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:David George Leslie


text:
User talk:Damian almiron

-- 14:44, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Damian almiron


text:
User talk:Kimakeisuke

-- 14:50, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kimakeisuke


text:
User talk:Donn certo

-- 14:53, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Donn certo


text:
User talk:Pham van dai cx

-- 15:31, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Pham van dai cx


text:
User talk:Ziopeee

-- 15:36, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ziopeee


text:
Thread:Comments:Swiss mountaineer Erhard Loretan dies in climbing accident/52nd birthday??

if he was 11 years old when he started climbing in 1982 then he could not have been 52 when he died. 156.8.251.250 (talk) 15:49, 30 April 2011 (UTC)


text:
Thread:Comments:Swiss mountaineer Erhard Loretan dies in climbing accident/52nd birthday??/reply

Indeed. But the article doesn't say that — it says that he started climbing when he was eleven. It then goes on to say that he climbed a certain peak in 1982.


text:
Thread:Comments:Swiss mountaineer Erhard Loretan dies in climbing accident/52nd birthday??/reply (2)

Sorry, I correct myself. Did not see the period/full stop. A result of old age! 156.8.251.250 (talk) 15:52, 30 April 2011 (UTC)


text:
Thread:Comments:Swiss mountaineer Erhard Loretan dies in climbing accident/52nd birthday??/reply (3)

"In 1982, he climbed his first 8,000-meter peak ...". He did not start climbing in 1982. He started climbing at the age of eleven.


text:
User talk:Sanchool10

-- 15:54, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sanchool10


text:
User talk:Tommieboi

-- 15:54, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tommieboi


text:
User talk:Bcjmor

-- 15:55, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bcjmor


text:
Thread:Comments:Deadly tornadoes rip through southern US, killing over 300/Comments from feedback form - "Was Canada affected at all? I'..."/reply

I have seen no mention of Canada in any of the sources I reviewed.


text:
User talk:Lairdeaux

-- 16:00, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lairdeaux


text:
Thread:Comments:Steve Jobs denies 'location-gate'/Ugh/reply

Makes you "LOOK" retarted? The whole bloody USA *IS* retarted. 156.8.251.250 (talk) 16:04, 30 April 2011 (UTC)


text: Template:Weak delete

title: Template:Weak delete


text:
User talk:Johnbougearel

-- 16:11, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Johnbougearel


text:
Thread:Comments:Steve Jobs denies 'location-gate'/Ugh/reply (2)

retar t ed → retar d ed.


text:
Thread:Comments:Petition urges Apple to remove 'anti-gay' app/Seems silly/reply (14)

no gay is BORN a faggot, they were brought up that way by mommy and daddy. Homosexuality is WRONG. 156.8.251.250 (talk) 16:11, 30 April 2011 (UTC)


text:
Thread:Comments:Poverty rises as food prices increase/The future/reply (2)

hopefully AIDS will create a good balance and see to the problem of overpopulation in Africa. 156.8.251.250 (talk) 16:20, 30 April 2011 (UTC)


text:
Thread:Comments:Poverty rises as food prices increase/But Congress Said . . ./reply

And the Obama administration is supporting incentives growing food crops for biofuels.


text:
Thread:Comments:South African serial killer guilty of nineteen rapes, sixteen murders/NOT a friend of the president

This guy is obviously NOT a friend of president Zuma or the ruling ANC. He would have been found not guilty before the trail even started if he was...156.8.251.250 (talk) 16:28, 30 April 2011 (UTC)


text:
Thread:Comments:Nelson Mandela suffers collapsed lung/Comments from feedback form - "Mandela spent twenty-seven yea..."/reply (2)

Mandela and his cronies are terrorists. Has been, still are and always will be. One day this so-called black messiah will die and people will catch a wake-up that he is NOT God.156.8.251.250 (talk) 16:31, 30 April 2011 (UTC)


text:
User talk:Final-Chaos

-- 17:18, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Final-Chaos


text:
User talk:Puigvert

-- 17:33, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Puigvert


text:
User talk:Arboubou

-- 17:34, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Arboubou


text:
User talk:Oliwier1111

-- 17:40, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Oliwier1111


text:
User talk:YellowPlant

-- 17:47, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:YellowPlant


text:
User talk:Kushal Bhattacharya

-- 18:01, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kushal Bhattacharya


text:
User talk:Atmtheva

-- 18:16, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Jaffna Theatre
Hi! Thanks for your interest in Wikinews. Unfortunately, we don't publish encyclopedic articles, so we couldn't accept your article "Jaffna Theatre". We welcome news stories, though. The template at the top of this page has instructions on how to create your first article, and, as the template says, if you have questions, don't hesitate to ask. --Pi zero (talk) 18:32, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Atmtheva


text:
Thread:Comments:Prince William marries Kate Middleton—live updates/Disappointing.../reply

I certainly refute any allegations I "wasted" my time in writing this article. Although several reviewers accepted revisions throughout the day—to these people I am incredibly grateful—but as the only author (apart from some spelling mistakes I made corrected by other people, to whom I also extend my gratitude), I must say I enjoyed spending my day writing this. Since I am only a volunteer on this project, I choose what I want to write about and make no apology for doing so. There is a mixed verdict on the live blog from the community; personally I think it went very well. Whether the view of the community is that it was a success or not, I know I certainly did not waste my time writing this yesterday.


text:
Thread:Comments:Prince William marries Kate Middleton—live updates/Disappointing.../reply (2)

5 stars and a gold trophy for making an excellent point go to Dragonfire1024. I couldn't agree with you more if I was paid to agree with you. There were much better places to do this, Wikinews is not part of the blogosphere, and although done well, was done entirely in the wrong place. While stuff is happening elsewhere, we basically turned into a twitter feed. Volunteer or not, we're a news site, not a blog. If it'd been done as a news article, maybe not such a bad idea.


text:
User talk:Ral725

-- 18:48, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ral725


text:
Thread:Comments:Tornadoes damage hundreds of Missouri homes, force closure of airport/Comments from feedback form - "good job"

good job


text:
User talk:174.54.215.163

Please address the issues raised by the reviewer before asking it be reviewed again. Then we can hopefuly publish your article. :) Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 18:58, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

You've been blocked from editing Wikinews for a period of 3 hours. This is for abusing the review process, which is considered to be disruptive to the community. After this block has expired, please read our rules surrounding review, and our Manual of Style before you return to editing. Thank you. BarkingFish (talk) 21:25, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Blood Red Sandman (Talk)   (Contribs) 20:53, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:174.54.215.163


text:
User talk:Hughsername

-- 18:58, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hughsername


text:
Thread:Comments:Prince William marries Kate Middleton—live updates/Disappointing.../reply (3)

And so the Guardian, Metro, Channel 4 News, Telegraph, BBC, Independent, Sydney Morning Herald, Scotsman and NPR are also not news websites? I've said it before and I'll say it again: the live blog was a test for a new format which I thought would be more inventive than a simple article. If the community says they don't want me doing it again, I won't do it again.


text:
User talk:Cddams

-- 18:59, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Cddams


text:
User talk:Dzirt 8

-- 19:12, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dzirt 8


text:
User talk:Mercadeo casasol

-- 19:21, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mercadeo casasol


text:
Thread:Comments:Qur'an-burning pastor jailed after mosque protest barred/Comments from feedback form - "With so much at stake & everyt..."/reply (30)

free speech and free action are different


text:
User talk:StefanoJuventus

-- 19:30, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:StefanoJuventus


text:
User talk:Yohay !23

-- 19:31, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Yohay !23


text:
User talk:Aishwary jain

-- 19:36, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Aishwary jain


text: User:Grammy Gang

title: User:Grammy Gang


text: User:AgsjdvfjGF\fashdfvSH

title: User:AgsjdvfjGF\fashdfvSH


text: User:HAND OF BLOODY PEE

title: User:HAND OF BLOODY PEE


text: User:Poopy pee!

title: User:Poopy pee!


text: User:Kitt!esonf!re RETURNS!

title: User:Kitt!esonf!re RETURNS!


text: User:I'm NOT Kitt!esonf!re

title: User:I'm NOT Kitt!esonf!re


text:
Thread:Comments:Qur'an-burning pastor jailed after mosque protest barred/Comments from feedback form - "With so much at stake & everyt..."/reply (31)

That's true. A peaceful demonstration or protest is considered free speech, and there was no evidence that the pastor would do anything violent, as far as I know. His views were unpopular, others would protest against his views, but that is not a reason to deny him free speech. None of the sources revealed any evidence that he has engaged in physically violent actions. His point of view is unpopular. Mattisse (talk) 19:46, 30 April 2011 (UTC)


text:
User talk:Ih55or

-- 19:50, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ih55or


text:
Thread:Comments:Prince William marries Kate Middleton—live updates/Disappointing.../reply (4)

One of the biggest security operations London has ever seen, the attendance of all three main political party leaders and countless foreign leaders, the attention of a huge chunk of the population of Britain and indeed the globe, blanket media coverage in the UK for weeks, hundreds of street parties, and the declaration of a public holiday for the entire country. Whatever you think of the Royal Family, this was not "just a wedding".

Sure there probably were more important things going on, but I don't see how the existence of this article stopped anyone writing about them.


text:
User talk:IDK112

-- 20:11, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:IDK112


text:
User talk:Miedosaw

-- 20:19, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Miedosaw


text:
User talk:Juanpi98

-- 20:35, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Juanpi98


text:
User talk:Glaydson198

-- 21:01, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Glaydson198


text:
User talk:Clayman~enwikinews

-- 21:03, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Hi Clayman! Be aware that removing tags - which are to aid improvement of articles - is disruptive unless some effort is made to fix the issues. Please don't do so again. Blood Red Sandman (Talk)   (Contribs) 21:28, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Clayman. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Clayman~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:13, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:30, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Clayman~enwikinews


text:
Thread:Comments:Prince William marries Kate Middleton—live updates/Disappointing.../reply (5)

Wikinews exists specifically to provide an alternative.


text:
User talk:Stehova

-- 21:09, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Stehova


text:
User talk:Ferreiraseudpcional

-- 21:11, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ferreiraseudpcional


text: User talk:Beatriz Garcia Luque

title: User talk:Beatriz Garcia Luque


text:
User talk:Casinoonline21

-- 21:35, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Casinoonline21


text:
User talk:Momogood

-- 21:36, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Momogood


text:
User:Amgine/100 news article sample, to compare news categories to en.WN

Methodology: visit 3 GN storylines with lotsa articles, examine most recent 33 articles for article tags/categories/sections.

Syria protests

 * 1) The National (beta) Arab Emirates, Syrian forces storm mosque
 * 2) * SYRIA
 * 3) * News->Worldwide
 * 4) Telegraph UK, Syria: the west can shorten Syrian regime's deadly campaign
 * 5) * News->Worldwide->Middle East
 * 6) * Syria
 * 7) Sunday Times Sri Lanka, 62 killed in protests, Syria faces sanctions
 * 8) * [none]
 * 9) ToTheCenter.Com Syrian forces open fire on streets of besieged city of Deraa
 * 10) * Middle East
 * 11) The Voice of Russia, Syrian troops storm rebel stronghold in Deraa
 * 12) * News
 * 13) CBC.ca Syrian forces take over mosque
 * 14) * World
 * 15) * Middle East
 * 16) * Syria
 * 17) The Jerusalem Post, 138 Baath Party members resign to protest Syria crackdown
 * 18) * JPost.com->Middle East
 * 19) * Washington, D.C.
 * 20) * Bashar al-Assad
 * 21) * Damascus
 * 22) * Reuters
 * 23) * Syria
 * 24) * tanks
 * 25) * Deraa
 * 26) * Bashar Assad
 * 27) * Damascus
 * 28) * Jordan
 * 29) Telegraph UK, Anti-government protests flare across Syria
 * 30) * News Video
 * 31) * Syria
 * 32) * Telegraph TV
 * 33) Arut Sheva (Israel National News), Obama Excludes Assad from Symbolic Sanctions against Syria
 * 34) * ->News
 * 35) Telegraph UK, Assad tightens the noose in Syrian town of Deraa
 * 36) * News->World->Middle East
 * 37) * Syria
 * 38) * News
 * 39) * World News
 * 40) * Middle East
 * 41) * Colin Freeman
 * 42) * Adrian Blomfield
 * 43) Aljazeera, Death toll rises as Syria crackdown continues
 * 44) * Top news
 * 45) * Middle East
 * 46) * People
 * 47) ** Bashar al-Assad
 * 48) ** Maher al-Assad
 * 49) ** Adnan Mahmud
 * 50) ** Catherine Ashton
 * 51) * Country
 * 52) ** Syria
 * 53) ** United States
 * 54) ** Lebanon
 * 55) *City
 * 56) ** Deraa
 * 57) ** Homs
 * 58) ** Baniyas
 * 59) ** Damascus
 * 60) ** Geneva
 * 61) ** Nicosia
 * 62) ** Washington
 * 63) ** London
 * 64) ** Brussels
 * 65) ** Jableh
 * 66) ** Qamishli
 * 67) *Organisation
 * 68) ** European Union
 * 69) ** army
 * 70) ** White House
 * 71) ** Fourth Armoured Division
 * 72) ** Committee of the Martyrs
 * 73) ** Muslim Brotherhood
 * 74) ** UN Human Rights Council
 * 75) ** Syrian government
 * 76) Guardian UK, Syrian government forces launch fresh attacks against Deraa protesters
 * 77) * News->World News->Syria
 * 78) * World news
 * 79) * Syria
 * 80) * Bashar Al-Assad
 * 81) * Arab and Middle East unrest
 * 82) * Middle East
 * 83) Payvand Iran News (VOA), US Imposes New Sanctions Against Syria Over Crackdown
 * 84) * VOA
 * 85) * ->Middle East, Asia
 * 86) Payvand Iran News (VOA), Protest Crackdowns Leave Almost 62 Dead in Syria
 * 87) * VOA
 * 88) * ->Middle East, Asia
 * 89) Guardian UK, Syria shockwaves sweep across Middle East
 * 90) * News->World News->Syria
 * 91) * World news
 * 92) * Syria
 * 93) * Bashar Al-Assad
 * 94) * Arab and Middle East unrest
 * 95) * Middle East
 * 96) Seattle Post-Intelligencer, Syrian troops kill 4 at mosque in restive city]
 * 97) * US/World->Middle East
 * 98) NewsTalk ZB, New Zealand, More dead in Syrian protests
 * 99) * Home > News > International
 * 100) HuffingtonPost, The Different Syrian Regime as Fractured and Shaken by the Uprising
 * 101) * Syria Protests
 * 102) * Syria
 * 103) * Bashar Al-Assad
 * 104) * Israel Syria
 * 105) * Obama Syria
 * 106) * Syria Palestine
 * 107) * World News
 * 108) * World->Middle East
 * 109) Daily Star India, Syrians vow for more protests
 * 110) * Bashar al-Assad
 * 111) * United States
 * 112) * Syria
 * 113) * Human Rights
 * 114) * Damascus
 * 115) * Facebook
 * 116) * International
 * 117) Herald Sun Australia, Syrian snipers reportedly kill 6
 * 118) * World->Middle East
 * 119) * World->North America
 * 120) Forexyard (Reuters), Reuters World News Highlights 1800 GMT April 30
 * 121) * [none]
 * 122) Radio New Zealand News, Syrian troops seize key mosque
 * 123) * ->News


text:
User talk:Kokubo tomohiro

-- 21:52, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kokubo tomohiro


text:
User talk:Masri daniel

-- 21:53, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Masri daniel


text:
User talk:Scales~enwikinews

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Scales. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Scales~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:28, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:36, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Scales~enwikinews


text:
User talk:Geokam

-- 22:03, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Geokam


text:
User talk:Akhudon

-- 22:08, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Akhudon


text:
User talk:Ssabdulhaq

-- 22:16, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ssabdulhaq


text:
'Very dangerous' killer escapes South African hospital

April 30, 2011

A "very dangerous" inmate whose convictions include rape and murder has escaped from Hospital in South Africa. 29-year-old Andries Gamba Msimang, from Mozambique, absconded on Friday.

Jailed in September 2009, Msimang "is serving a life sentence for murder, robbery, rape and house breaking with intent to rob and kidnap," says the Department of Correctional Services. The Department urges the public to summon police help if they see the escapee and not attempt to apprehend him themselves.

The Department further explained the man has been in hospital since Tuesday when he suffered a stroke. Two corrections officers left to guard the prisoner in hospital have been suspended and their employer says they "may face charges of gross negligence and dereliction of responsibility."

Police and the Department of Corrections are working together to try and return the killer to custody.


text:
User talk:TRStrunk

-- 22:39, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:TRStrunk


text:
User talk:Jat123

-- 22:42, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jat123


text:
User talk:Kaanbaylar

-- 22:51, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kaanbaylar


text: Comments:Egyptian politician ElBaradei says ousted President Mubarak must stand trial


text:
User talk:Menwalsa

-- 22:59, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Menwalsa


text: Talk:'Very dangerous' killer escapes South African hospital


text: Comments:'Very dangerous' killer escapes South African hospital


text: Template:Xe

title: Template:Xe


text: Template:Xyr

title: Template:Xyr


text: Template:Xem

title: Template:Xem


text: Template:Weak keep

title: Template:Weak keep


text:
User talk:Argentinium

-- 23:42, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Argentinium


text:
User talk:Nbarile18

-- 00:09, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nbarile18


text:
Thread:Comments:'Very dangerous' killer escapes South African hospital/SO WHAT'S NEW?

So what else is new in this cursed country?. This should not worry the government as Zuma plans to release a whole lot of murderers, robbers and rapists anyway. Cops and correctional services as usual have a finger in the pie here...I wonder how much they were paid to look the other way? 156.8.251.250 (talk) 00:52, 1 May 2011 (UTC)


text:
User talk:Tarso firace

-- 00:55, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tarso firace


text:
User talk:Turingsk

-- 01:00, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Turingsk


text:
User talk:Clayman123

-- 01:11, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Boyertown, Pennsylvania area school district student fight to save programs
Do not resubmit the article for review without addressing the reasons it was failed on review. Doing so is disruptive. --Pi zero (talk) 18:04, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Clayman123


text:
User talk:Khdhomes

-- 01:14, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Khdhomes


text:
User talk:Blackwidowhex

-- 01:18, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Blackwidowhex


text:
User talk:Jyothesh

-- 01:18, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jyothesh


text:
User talk:Chess207

-- 01:21, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Chess207


text:
User talk:Jezhug

-- 01:23, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jezhug


text:
User talk:Man-11Gmb

-- 01:55, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Man-11Gmb


text:
User talk:Harriskw

-- 02:12, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Harriskw


text:
Thread:Comments:Deadly tornadoes rip through southern US, killing over 300/Comments from feedback form - "after Katrina, US never learns..."

after Katrina, US never learns, a payback, more will be coming.


text:
User talk:JPMCMLKCCLS

-- 02:23, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:JPMCMLKCCLS


text:
User talk:Azeroz

-- 02:29, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Azeroz


text:
User talk:SUFCboy

 — fetch · comms  02:41, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Aaron Allard wins Big Brother 2011 (UK)
Hi! The article was found not ready on review; there are problems that need to be addressed, beyond what an independent reviewer can do. See the review comments. You can also learn more about Wikinews procedures from the. --Pi zero (talk) 04:27, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

 * Hi again. Another round of not ready review comments.  --Pi zero (talk) 01:19, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:SUFCboy


text:
User talk:Metro6023

-- 02:41, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Metro6023


text:
User talk:Kunal.aol

-- 03:10, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kunal.aol


text:
Thread:Comments:Former Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak to face trial/Comments from feedback form - "curt,...to the point,...worth ..."

curt,...to the point,...worth reading.


text:
NASCAR driver Kyle Busch wins 2011 spring race in Richmond, Virginia

May 1, 2011

driver won his third consecutive NASCAR  spring race at  on Saturday during the   in Virginia. Throughout the course of the race there were eight and the lead changed among ten drivers.

Busch, who led 235 laps, was over one second ahead of his teammate at the conclusion of the race. finished third, ahead of and. ,, , and followed in the next four positions. could only manage a tenth place finish.

During the race, collided into, prompting Montoya to crash into the. Following the accident, Newman told his crew, "I can't believe they [NASCAR] aren't going to black flag that 42 car. ... I'm going to take care of it after the race." On lap 236, Montoya collided back into Newman.

64 laps later, a nine car accident, involving, , and six other drivers occurred. Following the accident, Gordon commented, "I seem to find the worst angles for hitting walls. I wish there was a SAFER barrier there. I seem to be able to find the ones without the SAFER barrier."

After the race, Busch said, "I learned from Denny last fall, and I'm not going to say what I learned. He might know, but we did a good job at doing what we needed to do." Next, Hamlin told his crew chief that he "didn't have anything" for Busch.

Following the race, Edwards remains leader with 335 points. Nine points behind, Johnson is second with 326. In third, Busch is 30 points behind, but four ahead of  and  are fifth and sixth respectively with 300 and 289 points. Bowyer, Newman, Kenseth, and Stewart round out the top-ten positions for the Drivers' Championship.

The 2011 season continues on May 7 at for the 2011. The race will be televised in the U.S. on the at 7:30 p.m. EDT.


text:
User talk:DJDantae

-- 03:27, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:DJDantae


text:
User talk:Lidashin

-- 03:36, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lidashin


text:
User talk:Cancanisstory

-- 03:38, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Cancanisstory


text:
User talk:JokestrMike89

-- 03:51, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:JokestrMike89


text:
User talk:Bigblue535658

-- 03:55, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bigblue535658


text:
User talk:Muniyugandhar

-- 03:57, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Muniyugandhar


text:
User talk:Aneeeez

-- 03:58, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Aneeeez


text:
User talk:ErickaXxWorldOfChancesx3

-- 03:59, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:ErickaXxWorldOfChancesx3


text:
User talk:Panditus

-- 04:01, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Panditus


text:
User talk:Plasenta

-- 05:12, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Plasenta


text:
User talk:Juttni punjabi

-- 05:28, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Juttni punjabi


text:
User talk:ジャコウネズミ

-- 05:38, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:ジャコウネズミ


text:
User talk:Crumptyjack

-- 06:01, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Crumptyjack


text:
User talk:Carachi

-- 06:11, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Carachi


text:
Thread:Comments:Prince William marries Kate Middleton—live updates/Disappointing.../reply (6)

I just want to say fantastic. This is a really good article - I thought that this was a credit to Wikinews! Well done Brian | (Talk) | New Zealand Portal 06:31, 1 May 2011 (UTC)