text: User talk:Porchcrop alternative

title: User talk:Porchcrop alternative


text: User talk:Sylwiaartiomowa

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: User talk:Sylwiaartiomowa


text:
Thread:Comments:Interpol orders arrest of Wikileaks founder to face rape charges/wiki leaks founder/reply (7)

Same here, I support Assange in this case (though not necessarily about the two war leaks), and I'm American as well.


text:
Thread:Comments:Pentagon 'don't ask don't tell' poll shows support for repeal/Comments from feedback form - "McCain needs to give his head ..."/reply

You do realize that science has shown that just because someone is against gays does not not mean they are homosexual as well? Admittedly, I don't have the source (can't remember) but automatically pinning on that is a fallacy.

Unless you're a troll. In which case, U MAD?


text: User talk:Vanished user 9876543

title: User talk:Vanished user 9876543


text: User talk:Phpnews

title: User talk:Phpnews


text:
User talk:Rpgray~enwikinews

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Rpgray. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Rpgray~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:27, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:36, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rpgray~enwikinews


text: User talk:King Bananamoo

title: User talk:King Bananamoo


text: User talk:Zavatskig

title: User talk:Zavatskig


text: User talk:Lisséth

title: User talk:Lisséth


text: User talk:Alexbreen

title: User talk:Alexbreen


text: User talk:Edwardo622

title: User talk:Edwardo622


text: User talk:Pn innocentdevil

title: User talk:Pn innocentdevil


text: User talk:Carlitoos12

title: User talk:Carlitoos12


text: User talk:Cestaimee

title: User talk:Cestaimee


text: User talk:Foxflame

title: User talk:Foxflame


text: User talk:Blacklupus

title: User talk:Blacklupus


text: User talk:Mahmoud eljendy

title: User talk:Mahmoud eljendy


text: User talk:Korruza

title: User talk:Korruza


text: User talk:Yusuf Komara

title: User talk:Yusuf Komara


text: User talk:Olguita Casco

title: User talk:Olguita Casco


text: User talk:Cauleenspage

title: User talk:Cauleenspage


text: User talk:Ilmondodelcalcio

title: User talk:Ilmondodelcalcio


text: User talk:Hyacinth and Rose Petal

title: User talk:Hyacinth and Rose Petal


text: User talk:Sardaran

title: User talk:Sardaran


text: User talk:PS31994

title: User talk:PS31994


text: User talk:Michio62

title: User talk:Michio62


text: User talk:Qichao cham

title: User talk:Qichao cham


text: User talk:Luis797

title: User talk:Luis797


text:
Comments:CanadaVOTES: NDP candidate Paul Arbour in Carleton—Mississippi Mills

Paul Arbour is a self-proclaimed communist.


text: User talk:Furtif0011

title: User talk:Furtif0011


text: User talk:Vishu123vi

title: User talk:Vishu123vi


text: User talk:DMelvinKaphan

title: User talk:DMelvinKaphan


text: User talk:Umdterps1045

title: User talk:Umdterps1045


text:
Thread:Comments:Interpol orders arrest of Wikileaks founder to face rape charges/Comments from feedback form - "That's really terrible and a l..."

That's really terrible and a little funny how dumbass Hillary Clinton said "There is nothing laudable about endangering innocent people, and there is nothing brave about sabotaging peaceful relations between nations on which our common security depends." She added that the US "deeply regrets" the leakage of the files."

Nowhere does she even come close to appologizing for all of the terrible and hurtful things the people who are a part of her "great" country said and did.

completely and utterly appauling!


text: User talk:Fcstransportation

title: User talk:Fcstransportation


text: User talk:NGC 3372

title: User talk:NGC 3372


text: User talk:Jerry 63

title: User talk:Jerry 63


text: User talk:Lamro sinaga

title: User talk:Lamro sinaga


text:
Thread:Comments:Interpol orders arrest of Wikileaks founder to face rape charges/Timing

I'm fairly certain my 7 year old son could see through this...


text:
User talk:182.1.11.212

Hello, !

This is Wikinews, a free news source. Wikinews is an experiment in citizen journalism, not an encyclopedia. You may be confusing us with our sister project Wikipedia. Your encyclopedic addition to Wikinews was deleted. Please add it to Wikipedia if it is relevant there. We would be happy to welcome you as a contributor to Wikinews! Bawolff ☺☻ 05:27, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

title: User talk:182.1.11.212


text: User talk:Binquoi

title: User talk:Binquoi


text: User talk:Vkendra

title: User talk:Vkendra


text: User talk:Daniel7799

title: User talk:Daniel7799


text: User talk:Cyming2

title: User talk:Cyming2


text: User talk:橋口彩夏

title: User talk:橋口彩夏


text: User talk:Anton hilman pirdaus

title: User talk:Anton hilman pirdaus


text: User talk:Adstar12

title: User talk:Adstar12


text: User talk:Harisuthan

title: User talk:Harisuthan


text: User talk:Amarprabha1958

title: User talk:Amarprabha1958


text: User talk:Heavyweight Gamer

title: User talk:Heavyweight Gamer


text: User talk:Shehzad.imran

title: User talk:Shehzad.imran


text: User talk:UmaRaja

title: User talk:UmaRaja


text: User talk:Himusdidi

title: User talk:Himusdidi


text: User talk:Screaminmyhead

title: User talk:Screaminmyhead


text: User talk:Kasi999

title: User talk:Kasi999


text: User talk:PterodactylPseudonym

title: User talk:PterodactylPseudonym


text: User talk:Mihir1234

title: User talk:Mihir1234


text: User talk:JonatasM

title: User talk:JonatasM


text:
Thread:Comments:Files will risk 'countless' lives, Obama administration warns Wikileaks/Comments from feedback form - "gives me knowledge to the doma..."

gives me knowledge to the domain of reality


text: User talk:Fifit fitriani

title: User talk:Fifit fitriani


text: User talk:Ahmedismailnegm

title: User talk:Ahmedismailnegm


text: User talk:Dode.girl

title: User talk:Dode.girl


text: User talk:懂你

title: User talk:懂你


text: User talk:Yndnope

title: User talk:Yndnope


text: User talk:Bogoytisoy

title: User talk:Bogoytisoy


text: User talk:Tolyatolya

title: User talk:Tolyatolya


text: User talk:Jubinjacob

title: User talk:Jubinjacob


text:
Thread:Comments:Interpol orders arrest of Wikileaks founder to face rape charges/Comments from feedback form - "courage julian!"/reply (2)

While I like the basic idea of Wikileaks, something seems wrong about just suddenly releasing documents in huge, announced, planned batches like some kind of spectacle, and then leaving it up to the media to spin it in its usual fashion, thus accomplishing little to nothing.

I see no change being advocated here, I see no clear-cut cause. No message is being sent to the governments of the world other than "America sucks at keeping secrets." Worthwhile lessons can be derived from this event, but Assange doesn't seem to be pointing anyone in a particular direction. He's running something extremely dangerous yet he seems to avoid committing himself to a goal, allowing his vague agenda to be twisted into whatever people want to believe he's doing - to his enemies he's trying to destabilize the world while others regard him as a freedom-fighter. I don't think he knows what he wants or how to achieve it; alternatively, he foolishly expects someone else to champion particular issues Wikileaks brings to light, believing that his purpose is only to facilitate that.


text: User talk:W8n2xhale

title: User talk:W8n2xhale


text: User talk:Luxedesignnyc

title: User talk:Luxedesignnyc


text: User talk:Lokongoma

title: User talk:Lokongoma


text: User talk:จักรกฤษณ์ บูชาบุญ

title: User talk:จักรกฤษณ์ บูชาบุญ


text: Talk:'Completely irresponsible' woman called emergency services to report theft of snowman


text: Comments:'Completely irresponsible' woman called emergency services to report theft of snowman


text: User talk:ARMIKU

title: User talk:ARMIKU


text: User talk:Anoop Trevedi

title: User talk:Anoop Trevedi


text: User talk:Dorel florin

title: User talk:Dorel florin


text: User talk:Kabilan29

title: User talk:Kabilan29


text: User talk:Toximatic

title: User talk:Toximatic


text: User talk:Decubiado

title: User talk:Decubiado


text: User talk:Lnsx

title: User talk:Lnsx


text: User talk:James1100

title: User talk:James1100


text: User talk:Lape Briedis

title: User talk:Lape Briedis


text: User talk:Kevinwburns

title: User talk:Kevinwburns


text: User talk:Branchtell

title: User talk:Branchtell


text: User talk:Nimra Munir

title: User talk:Nimra Munir


text: User talk:ArmedRadar2307

title: User talk:ArmedRadar2307


text: User talk:Sirajkhatri

title: User talk:Sirajkhatri


text: User talk:ZELZELES

title: User talk:ZELZELES


text: User talk:Tjdon12345

title: User talk:Tjdon12345


text: User talk:Sampaadak

title: User talk:Sampaadak


text: User talk:WMUKBot

title: User talk:WMUKBot


text:
Thread:Comments:'Completely irresponsible' woman called emergency services to report theft of snowman/999?

I thought it was 0118-999-881-999-119-7253


text: User talk:ايمن1909

title: User talk:ايمن1909


text: User talk:Xtremeactivities

title: User talk:Xtremeactivities


text: User talk:Pein0611

title: User talk:Pein0611


text: Talk:British government scraps planned rules on pay equality


text: Comments:British government scraps planned rules on pay equality


text: User talk:Mihadeth

title: User talk:Mihadeth


text: User talk:Esscience

title: User talk:Esscience


text:
User talk:Kittykat~enwikinews

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Kittykat. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Kittykat~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:17, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:33, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kittykat~enwikinews


text: User talk:Marcos canbeiro

title: User talk:Marcos canbeiro


text:
Thread:Comments:'Completely irresponsible' woman called emergency services to report theft of snowman/999?/reply

Technically, she could have phoned 112 instead...


text: User talk:MArigonna

title: User talk:MArigonna


text:
Thread:Comments:'Completely irresponsible' woman called emergency services to report theft of snowman/999?/reply (2)

My understanding is 112 will reroute you to 999, so one could argue it was still a 999 call. ;)

Out of interest, what happens in countries where the emergency services are split and all have separate numbers? Where does 112 take you there? (My assuption is if multiple services are involved, the police will handle dispatches, and hence will take 112, but I really have no idea.)


text: User talk:John195

title: User talk:John195


text: User talk:Titikocska

title: User talk:Titikocska


text:
Thread:Comments:'Completely irresponsible' woman called emergency services to report theft of snowman/999?/reply (3)

You mean where the emergency services all have separate emergency (999, 911) numbers? Or where they each have their own normal phone number? My understanding is that in most (if not all) cases the emergency dispatcher simply dispatches the correct type of ES personal. IE, if you call 911 and report a fire, they send a fire truck. If you call 911 and report a heart attack, they send an ambulance. If you call and merely say "help", they send police, who then call in reinforcements if necessary.


text: User talk:Wojcikpiotr71

title: User talk:Wojcikpiotr71


text: User talk:Uguroz22

title: User talk:Uguroz22


text: User talk:Kichappan

title: User talk:Kichappan


text:
Thread:Comments:'Completely irresponsible' woman called emergency services to report theft of snowman/999?/reply (4)

I don't understand your question, which sounds like two ways of saying the same thing to me.

I mean where there is no central number (no 999, no 911). You call, say, 12 to get fire & rescue, 13 for medical, 14 for police. Who does 112 get you? Greece operates such a system: http://www.greeklandscapes.com/travel/emergency_numbers.html

Note direct numbers for police, fire, ambulance; yet 112 is listed as "Police/Medical/Fire". Do they have a few folk redirecting calls, or does it go to the police to sort out, or.... ?

112, for those who don't know, is a central number valid accross the EU and I don't know where else.


text: User talk:Truong hoang quan

title: User talk:Truong hoang quan


text:
Thread:Comments:FIFA announce Russia to host 2018 World Cup, Qatar to host 2022 World Cup/Surprising bids/reply

Yep, I agree with your comment, from the point of view of an Aussie. As long as everybody gets a chance, I am sure that is the spirit of soccer (or European football). Where on earth did the name soccer come from?


text: User talk:Jduwawa

title: User talk:Jduwawa


text: User talk:Dr.samo7a

title: User talk:Dr.samo7a


text:
Thread:Comments:U.S. Army revives next-generation Ground Combat Vehicle program/As long as it can

save us from China, that would be good. Anti-infantry sounds promising.


text: User talk:Olavevarma

title: User talk:Olavevarma


text: User talk:TamaraSpry

title: User talk:TamaraSpry


text: User talk:Lmarksman

title: User talk:Lmarksman


text: User talk:Big alas

title: User talk:Big alas


text: User talk:Tharindus

title: User talk:Tharindus


text: User talk:S.U.Ziraat

title: User talk:S.U.Ziraat


text: User talk:Liev Novykh

title: User talk:Liev Novykh


text: User talk:Настюшка 190298

title: User talk:Настюшка 190298


text: User talk:Azzl9

title: User talk:Azzl9


text: User talk:Skyblueshaun

title: User talk:Skyblueshaun


text: User talk:Adiiiizz

title: User talk:Adiiiizz


text: User talk:Vajo70

title: User talk:Vajo70


text: User talk:Adi fizik

title: User talk:Adi fizik


text:
Thread:Comments:'Completely irresponsible' woman called emergency services to report theft of snowman/999?/reply (5)

As far as I know, 112 is just a standard number that works across Europe to route your calls to the emergency services. It has also been standardised with the mobile networks such that even if you don't have mobile coverage in a particular area on your chosen network, all networks will try and route 112 calls even from non-subscribers. Plus I think 112 also works with text messaging in some countries - the UK have added an emergency SMS service: great for deaf people and when you want to silently alert the police to being kidnapped.

Basically, the simple rule is: dial 112 rather than 999. It'll work more often than 999.

And, yes, in countries where they have separate numbers, you get redirected to an operator who asks what service you require and connects you to the service dispatcher.

See Emergency telephone number.


text: User talk:Manojlo11

title: User talk:Manojlo11


text: User talk:Persianpepe

title: User talk:Persianpepe


text: User talk:SABACHIY

title: User talk:SABACHIY


text: User talk:Jabrn98

title: User talk:Jabrn98


text: User talk:Aks0211

title: User talk:Aks0211


text: User talk:Jarick098

title: User talk:Jarick098


text: User talk:Style emo

title: User talk:Style emo


text: User talk:Lon thoi

title: User talk:Lon thoi


text:
Thread:Comments:FIFA announce Russia to host 2018 World Cup, Qatar to host 2022 World Cup/Surprising bids/reply (2)

Association football, assoc, soc, soccer i believe


text: User talk:Corn Cereal

title: User talk:Corn Cereal


text: User talk:Ylari4

title: User talk:Ylari4


text: User talk:Sisko Planet

title: User talk:Sisko Planet


text: User talk:Alldaysnice99

title: User talk:Alldaysnice99


text: User talk:Daniel Tian8764

title: User talk:Daniel Tian8764


text: User talk:Pq

title: User talk:Pq


text: User talk:Reeshpalat

title: User talk:Reeshpalat


text: User talk:Ph 1980

title: User talk:Ph 1980


text: User talk:Smallsmoker

title: User talk:Smallsmoker


text: User talk:Deepak kumar kalpi

title: User talk:Deepak kumar kalpi


text: User talk:Syedfahadquadri

title: User talk:Syedfahadquadri


text: User talk:Slamdunkan

title: User talk:Slamdunkan


text: User talk:Fugitiveride

title: User talk:Fugitiveride


text: User talk:Psmith fan

title: User talk:Psmith fan


text: User talk:GilDieye

title: User talk:GilDieye


text: User talk:Clement.philippe.olivier

title: User talk:Clement.philippe.olivier


text: User talk:Spiklla

title: User talk:Spiklla


text: User talk:Juanchomon

title: User talk:Juanchomon


text: User talk:Jaya Jose

title: User talk:Jaya Jose


text: User talk:Degradant

title: User talk:Degradant


text: User talk:Odisha1

title: User talk:Odisha1


text:
UK Parliament to vote on tuition fee rise on Thursday

December 5, 2010

The controversial plan to raise university tuition fees in England and Wales will be voted on in the on Thursday, December 9. The policy has been the cause of protests across the United Kingdom by students, some of which have turned violent. It has also been a source of considerable criticism and political difficulties for the Liberal Democrats and has raised questions as to the long-term viability of the Coalition government.

The new policy on tuition fees will allow universities to double the current tuition fees from £3,290 per year to around £6,000 per year, as well as allowing some universities to get special approval from the Office For Fair Access (OFFA) to raise their fees to £9,000 per year. If passed, the new fee structure will apply starting in the academic year of 2012/2013. The vote on Thursday will only be on the fee rise, with other matters being voted on in the new year following publication of a new higher education white paper.

In addition to increasing fees, the policy will increase the payment threshold at which payment is made. It is currently set at £15,000 and will rise to £21,000, but the interest rate will also rise. It is currently 1.5% but will now vary from between 0% and 3% plus inflation (using the Retail Price Index).

The fee increase follows the publication of an by Lord Browne, former chief executive of BP, a process started by Peter Mandelson, the former Business Secretary. Before the election, two main options were mooted for funding reform in higher education: either an increase in tuition fees or a. The Browne Review endorsed the former and the findings of the Review form the basis of the government's policy. The graduate tax was supported by the Liberal Democrats before the election, and in the Labour leadership elections it was supported by and the winner of the leadership election,.

Conservative members of the Coalition intend to vote for the reform, and the Labour opposition have been vociferous critics of the rise in fees, despite the previous government's introduction of top-up fees. The Liberal Democratic members of the Coalition have been left in a politically difficult position regarding the fee hike and have been target of much criticism from protesters. Liberal Democrats have opposed the rise in tuition fees: their party manifesto included a commitment to ending tuition fees within six years, and many signed a pledge organised by the to not vote for any increase in tuition fees.

The Coalition agreement allows Liberal Democrats to opt to abstain on votes for a number of policies including tuition fees. Many Liberal Democrats are expected to abstain, and a few MPs have stated that they will vote against it including former party leader Sir, and the recently elected party president , as well as a number of Liberal Democrat back-benchers. Liberal Democrat party leaders have said that they will act collectively, but the BBC have said senior Liberal Democrats have admitted in private that government whips will not be able to force all Liberal Democrats to vote for the policy.

On Tuesday, the Liberal Democrats parliamentary party will meet in the Commons to decide on their collective position. If all ministers decide to vote for the policy, it will probably pass, but if only cabinet ministers (and maybe parliamentary private secretaries) vote for the policy, there is considerable risk of it not passing. If the Coalition does not manage to get the policy through Parliament, it will fuel doubts about the continued effectiveness and viability of the government.

How deputy prime minister Nick Clegg and business secretary Vince Cable vote has been of considerable controversy. Although under the Coalition agreement, they are allowed to abstain, suggestions of doing so have prompted criticism. It was suggested last week that Cable may abstain even though as business secretary he is directly responsible for higher education policy, and has been heavily involved in designing the proposals. Cable has said that Liberal Democrat support of the tuition fee changes has allowed them to push it in a more "progressive" direction.

Cable has now decided that he will vote for the policy, and argues that the policy has "a lot of protection for students from low income backgrounds and graduates who have a low income or take time out for family". He also believes "there's common consensus that the system we've devised is a progressive one".

"Dr Cable has performed so many U-turns over the issue of university funding that he is spinning on his heels," said president. "That may stand him in good stead with the  judges but the electorate will see it differently."

Former deputy prime minister joked on Twitter that "On tuition fees we've noticed Vince Cable's remarkable transformation in the last few weeks from stalling to Mr In Between"—a reference to a previous attack Prescott made on Gordon Brown as having transformed from "Stalin to ".

On  this week, Liberal Democrat treasury secretary also confirmed he is prepared to vote for the policy but delegated the question to the meeting of Liberal Democrats on Tuesday.

The politics of the tuition fee debate may also affect the by-election taking place in Oldham East and Saddleworth following the removal of, where Liberal Democrat and Conservative candidates will both be standing for the first by-election following the formation of the Coalition government.

Opposition to the policy has become the focus for a large number of protests across the country by both current university students, many school pupils and political allies of the student movement.

On November 10, between 30,000 and 52,000 protesters from across Britain marched through central London in a demonstration organised by the and the, which represents teachers and lecturers in further and higher education. At the November 10 protest, a number of people occupied, an office block which houses the Conservative Party. Fifty people were arrested and fourteen were injured. NUS president Aaron Porter condemned the attack and said it was caused by "those who are here to cause trouble", and that the actions of a "minority of idiots" shouldn't "undermine 50,000 who came to make a peaceful protest".

Following the November 10 march, other protests have taken place across the country including an occupation at the, a sit-in at the John Owens Building in Manchester, and a demonstration at the. A protest was also run outside the offices of  where Nick Clegg—who was giving a lecture inside the building—was executed in effigy while students protested "Nick Clegg, shame on you, shame on you for turning blue" (blue is the colour of the Conservative Party).

On November 24, a large number of protests took place across the country including a mass walk-out from universities and schools organised on Facebook, numerous university occupations, and demonstrations in Manchester, Cambridge, Birmingham, Leeds, Brighton and Cardiff, and a well-publicised occupation of.

In London, a protest was planned to march down Whitehall to Parliament, but police held protesters in until they eventually broke free and ran around in a game of "cat and mouse" along the side streets around Charing Cross Road, Covent Garden and Picadilly Circus.

Simon Hardy from the National Campaign Against Fees and Cuts described the police response including the controversial 'kettling' of protesters as "absolutely outrageous". Green MP raised the police response including the use of kettling in the House of Commons and stated that it was "neither proportionate, nor, indeed, effective".

On November 30, protests continued in London culminating in 146 arrests of protesters in Trafalgar Square, and protests in Cardiff, Cambridge, Newcastle, Bath, Leeds, Sheffield, Edinburgh, Liverpool, Belfast, Brighton, Manchester and Bristol. Protesters in Sheffield attempted to invade and occupy Nick Clegg's constituency office. Occupations of university buildings started or continued at University College London, Newcastle University, Cambridge University and Nottingham University, as well as council buildings in Oxford and Birmingham.

A "day of action" is being planned on December 8, the day before the Commons vote, by the National Union of Students.


text: User talk:Oxandco

title: User talk:Oxandco


text: User talk:Billypan

title: User talk:Billypan


text: User talk:Dunois93

title: User talk:Dunois93


text: User talk:Peter.heslam

title: User talk:Peter.heslam


text: User talk:Jamarcorreia

title: User talk:Jamarcorreia


text: User talk:Merluche69

title: User talk:Merluche69


text: User talk:Shirishkala

title: User talk:Shirishkala


text: User talk:Sara de los Angeles

title: User talk:Sara de los Angeles


text: User talk:Georgitushev

title: User talk:Georgitushev


text: User talk:Alin.iacob

title: User talk:Alin.iacob


text: User talk:Ignacio Zippy Bravo

title: User talk:Ignacio Zippy Bravo


text: Comments:Alassane Ouattara 'wins' Ivory Coast presidential election


text: User talk:Dipasqualesalva

title: User talk:Dipasqualesalva


text: User talk:Dentalservce

title: User talk:Dentalservce


text: User talk:Ktrovato

title: User talk:Ktrovato


text: User talk:Fisz

title: User talk:Fisz


text: User talk:Hawk-1957

title: User talk:Hawk-1957


text: User talk:Gl1d3r

title: User talk:Gl1d3r


text:
User:Gl1d3r

In addition to Wikinews, I am a frequent contributor to Wikipedia and Wiktionary.

title: User:Gl1d3r


text: User talk:Nsr.deen

title: User talk:Nsr.deen


text: User talk:Stefan.klesa

title: User talk:Stefan.klesa


text: User talk:Historia1994

title: User talk:Historia1994


text: User talk:Ostaomar

title: User talk:Ostaomar


text:
User talk:Gmatteson~enwikinews

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Gmatteson. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Gmatteson~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:18, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:31, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gmatteson~enwikinews


text: User talk:Giuseppe Petrillo

title: User talk:Giuseppe Petrillo


text:
Thread:Comments:Alassane Ouattara 'wins' Ivory Coast presidental election/Who to believe?

Its seems that the conflicting election results are going to cause more unrest in the Ivory Coast. Each side's vote counters/observers will insist that they have the correct results, but who to believe? Is one side more believable than the other? Should such a significant election be decided by outsiders' declarations of an acceptable amount of voter fraud? It is disturbing that the benefit of the doubt in the western press always goes to the UN or outside voting monitors.


text:
Thread:Comments:Interpol orders arrest of Wikileaks founder to face rape charges/Comments from feedback form - "I wish there were more informa..."/reply

Well, first of all, Interpol didn't order anything. US fed requested that Interpol track his travel. And it has nothing to do with rape charges... 99.236.221.124 (talk) 19:09, 4 December 2010 (UTC)


text: User talk:Hameedbh

title: User talk:Hameedbh


text: User talk:Milosvk

title: User talk:Milosvk


text: User talk:Jbbdude

title: User talk:Jbbdude


text: User talk:Jiturajgor

title: User talk:Jiturajgor


text: User talk:Texasjayhawk

title: User talk:Texasjayhawk


text: User talk:Robert Prickett

title: User talk:Robert Prickett


text: User talk:Alisontalbot

title: User talk:Alisontalbot


text: User talk:Razaulkarim

title: User talk:Razaulkarim


text: User talk:RJH55

title: User talk:RJH55


text: User talk:Sehou

title: User talk:Sehou


text: User talk:Payam11452

title: User talk:Payam11452


text: User talk:Ghnnjsmkvieo

title: User talk:Ghnnjsmkvieo


text: User talk:BoleiroRJ

title: User talk:BoleiroRJ


text: User talk:Andrew334

title: User talk:Andrew334


text: User talk:Katarina cvetkovic

title: User talk:Katarina cvetkovic


text: User talk:Vital3

title: User talk:Vital3


text: User talk:Junna26

title: User talk:Junna26


text: User talk:Kveri

title: User talk:Kveri


text: User talk:Mona fares

title: User talk:Mona fares


text: User talk:The Creator 1986

title: User talk:The Creator 1986


text: User talk:Dpdeleon

title: User talk:Dpdeleon


text: User talk:Breate

title: User talk:Breate


text: User talk:Joe192837465

title: User talk:Joe192837465


text: User talk:Evan Hoyt

title: User talk:Evan Hoyt


text: User talk:Ninjabell

title: User talk:Ninjabell


text: User talk:Syedshamin

title: User talk:Syedshamin


text:
Thread:Comments:British government scraps planned rules on pay equality/Details

It almost seems like this Equality Act would (have) end(ed) up comparing an entry-level woman who's been on for a year to a man with 10 years on. While companies shouldn't promote a less-qualified candidate just because they're a man (or someone's nephew, etc.), that's not an issue of pay equality. (It's still an issue that should have legal repercussions, of course.)

You also can't necessarily say "because only 12% of the senior positions are female there's discrimination" - it's evidence that further investigation is warranted, but arbitrarily seeking something closer to an even split might just encourage companies to promote unqualified women. What's important is that a qualified woman is not impeded in her aspirations.

This strays a bit from the topic, but incorrectly implemented "equality" laws just end up insulting and even endangering women. My mom trained to pass using a man's standards for a very physically demanding job, and she can't stand when she has to work with some "dumb blonde" type (not necessarily blonde, just fitting the role) that can barely do the job. She says it's as bad as having to do the job alone.


text: User talk:Mersellabm

title: User talk:Mersellabm


text: User talk:Missydoggy555132

title: User talk:Missydoggy555132


text: User talk:Zelimir82

title: User talk:Zelimir82


text: User talk:Iyansetiana

title: User talk:Iyansetiana


text: User talk:Hindtoday

title: User talk:Hindtoday


text: User talk:Hcts

title: User talk:Hcts


text: User talk:Hamidhel

title: User talk:Hamidhel


text: User talk:Yonisnoop

title: User talk:Yonisnoop


text: User talk:Maubirimbao

title: User talk:Maubirimbao


text: User talk:Ken-NJITWILL

title: User talk:Ken-NJITWILL


text: User talk:Nicoamo97

title: User talk:Nicoamo97


text:
User talk:92.106.65.72

Our submission guidelines
I'd like to let you know that here at the English Wikinews, we only accept English language news. You've recently made contributions that don't qualify as news. We appreciate your contributions, but we cannot accept the edits you've made, so they have been reverted or deleted.

In the future, if you'd like to submit news, we are more than happy to have your help! Just make sure to check out this article, which talks about what Wikinews is not.

Thank you for your contributions! — Mike moral  ♪♫  22:56, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

title: User talk:92.106.65.72


text: User talk:Wielkobot

title: User talk:Wielkobot


text: User talk:Notjbg

title: User talk:Notjbg


text: User talk:Gala-art

title: User talk:Gala-art


text:
Thread:Comments:Interpol orders arrest of Wikileaks founder to face rape charges/Comments from feedback form - "Presents a broad analysis. Mar..."

Presents a broad analysis. Mark Stevens' comments are of particular interest. I have not seen this information in other news items on this topic.


text:
Thread:Comments:'Completely irresponsible' woman called emergency services to report theft of snowman/999?/reply (6)

Ah ok. Here there are two types of service: Either you have 911 or there is no emergency services number, and you have to directly call the police/fire/EMS station by their proper phone number IE, 1-408-222-3523 (this is increasing rare, even in distant rural areas). 911 which calls a central routing place. You talk to the operators, who decide for themselves what type of ES to dispatch. They don't reroute you to a separate dispatcher, AFAIK.

We don't have separate emergency numbers for police, fire, or EMS. If you need fire fighters, you call 911. Same with police, and same with EMS. In my city we each pay a small amount on every phone bill (like, 20 cents per month or something) to maintain the central routing service for emergency services.


text: User talk:Smcolp

title: User talk:Smcolp


text: User talk:Freddemalte

title: User talk:Freddemalte


text: User talk:Txchen92

title: User talk:Txchen92


text: User talk:Tinalzeng

title: User talk:Tinalzeng


text: User talk:Mohamedky13

title: User talk:Mohamedky13


text: User talk:Maxvelt

title: User talk:Maxvelt


text:
User talk:Yurtletturtle

Welcome to yurtletturtle's talk page
Please sign all comments with 4 tildes (~) Archive: 2010

Stale tagging
I think tagging articles stale is a tricky judgment call best left to reviewers. (I've see articles tagged stale at the two-day mark, occasionally seen synthesis published on the shady side of three days (when review was sluggish and output low), and of course original reporting is subject to different standards.) I've noticed you helping out with tagging articles with stuff that uncontroversially needs to be done, and it's appreciated — staleness is kind of inherently controversial, though, even when it isn't.  --Pi zero (talk) 23:33, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that's true Pi zero. I've published synthesis articles at 3.5 days before (well, once I think?), but only when I thought it was a great article, and that it would be a shame to let that much work go to waste just because the review queue was backlogged. There's definitely a certain amount of personal judgment in staleness. Some stories enter the news cycle and no one cares about them a couple hours later, whereas some stories (often momentous events) can be in the MSM for a week, even though no updates have come forward. It's variable, because it's more audience dependent than it is a strict policy issue, IMO.

 * Personally I don't think I'd tag an article stale until it was at least 4 days old, but that's just me. I'm sure opinions vary. Gopher65talk 23:52, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the heads-up. I'll leave the tricky stuff for you. =p ~YTT T 01:44, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Review
I've replied to your question on my talk page, very belatedly. In retrospect, it seems I missed it entirely at the time because Rayboy8 had left me another message between when you did and when I next checked the page (so now I'll know to watch out for that in future). --Pi zero (talk) 01:12, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Hey Pi, that's totally fine (and thanks for the response). ~YTT T 04:03, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Canadian devastated by Aussie floods
It is unclear from the weird tags I found from the numerous links in the email, but it looks as if my article has been deleted as "not newsworthy" and I am accused of "spamming" the newsies email.

I don't understand how a disabled man victimized by a foreign government after being victimized by an Act of God is NOT newsworthy. And yet if Paris Hilton's Australian mansion had been bulldozed by the government instead of a neighbourhood of destitute nobodies, I'm certain that would have made headlines. As to the 'spamming", I do not have explicit permission to reveal my friend's identity, so I privately sent copies of his facebook posts in a SINGLE email as evidence that I did not invent this story.

It's a shame that news organizations seem to want all their news supplied to them, for free, in neat packages complete with verified sources. The best articles start with a "story", and then someone looks into it to find out what's really going on, and continues to investigate until the whole truth is brought to light. Ah, the good old days. Now it seems if it doesn't come from a press release, it isn't relevant.

Kjsmith20 (talk) 21:10, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

 * Hi Kjsmith20,
 * Firstly, I never accused you of spamming the Wikinewsie email, some users didn't class it as a "genuine" scoop and just called it spam. I'm positive you sent the email (and started the article) all in good intentions.

 * Now to the article. Wikinews has a policy on sourcing. All articles have to be fully sourced or written with original reporting in order for them to be verifiable. The reason there are such high and strict standards is that this is what Wikinews relies on to distinguish itself from other, commercial, news organisations.

 * I can also see how you wanted your article published. The reason it was deleted, though, was because of another vital Wikinews policy - NPOV. We also rely on this to set us apart from commercial producers. An article that is fully unsourced or has no evidence of original reporting cannot be verified and often leads the article to be particularly POV.

 * I'm sorry we weren't able to publish your article, but the lifeblood of Wikinews is strict publishing conditions (after all, this is what we are about - being an alternative to commercial producers who often fill their article with POV and incorrect or misleading information). If you need any help, I would be happy to assist. Just drop me a line here. :) Thanks, ~YTT T 21:34, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Irish Prime Minister steps down as party leader
On reflection, please don't remove articles from the review queue when you aren't a reviewer. It's finally come home to me that this has a real likelihood of harm — it could result in potentially viable articles never getting published.

Of course, anyone is surely free to put comments on the talk page of an article waiting for review. But when you remove an article from the review queue, you are
 * claiming to have more authority than you actually have, which a newbie won't know better than;
 * telling the author that nothing else about the article should be addressed until after the things you've listed have been fixed; and
 * postponing when the article will be examined by a reviewer, and thereby postponing other important advice that a reviewer might give. Given the time constraints of freshness and of the people involved, that could indeed damage the article's chances of ever being published.  Not only is it less likely a reviewer will look at the article while it's not in the queue, but when it goes back into the queue it's lost its seniority, further delaying when it may get a reviewer's attention.

The general principle stands in any case — don't de-queue articles as a non-reviewer — but it also happens that in this particular case you failed the article for superficial reasons. It would be strange for a reviewer to halt xyr review at that point, rather than continuing on to give the author feedback on more important issues; and if xe didn't find anything else wrong, xe might choose to just fix those things and publish on the spot. --Pi zero (talk) 03:44, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Sure thing. No one else had given me that impression yet. As to the claim that the unofficial reviews indicate "more authority", I never meant to signal that. My actions had good intent - I was only trying to help. You bring up valid points and I should probably step back from the project a bit. Thanks, ~YTT T 05:21, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I haven't doubted your good intent for a moment. Stepping back just a bit is what I meant to suggest.
 * I was worried about this particular case, because it looked like the article has other problems that need to be pointed out sooner rather than later, but I didn't think at the moment I was up to the intensity of a full-blown review myself, leaving me to hope that another reviewer would get to it.
 * IMHO I overplayed the point about claimed authority. I am (and was) aware you were trying not to claim more authority that you have; my concern was that newbies wouldn't be in a position to pick up on nuances that you, as a Wikinewsie, are aware of.
 * You will, presumably, have observed Amgine's revert of my revert of your de-queuing (try saying that three times fast) on the accurate (if slightly knee-jerk) grounds that there is no actual policy against non-reviewers doing failing reviews. (I don't think the question has been raised since flaggedrevs was adopted.)
 * --Pi zero (talk) 07:35, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that Pi. As to unofficial reviews, I am just adopting a practice brought in from BarkingFish (since he lost reviewer). If I ever do another, I'll make sure I do a full review with all points addressed. (It's also nice to know I'm no longer referred to as a newbie anymore =p) On a side note, I have just created another article (Premier of Tasmania, David Bartlett, resigns and I, if you don't mind, I would like you to review it to highlight issues etc which may assist in my path to becoming a reviewer. Thanks again, ~YTT T 08:36, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I am only doing "Unofficial reviews" to show that I can safely review articles with a view to getting my reviewer status regranted. I made a massive mistake in reviewing one which lead to the complete eradication of the article, and it being hidden from view.  It's purely to indicate that I am making an effort to check the article in full before I try again to get my review status back. I don't actually remove the article from the review queue, just check it to see whether it has any glaring errors and stuff!  This is part of what Brian McNeil asked me to do when I screwed up - "tag articles as if reviewed".  You'd be welcome to check them and mark a manual review if you wish, but don't take them out of the queue please :)  BarkingFish (talk) 12:49, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Pseudodelete
Hey there,
 * Just to let you know that Pseudodelete is now in gadgets, if you would prefer to use it that way. (Pseudoprotect, however, is not — does that actually work? :P) — μ 00:50, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the heads-up! I'm busy with school at the moment so I don't often check my talk page. I'll be back again in about four weeks time. ~YTT T 10:18, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

semi-retired
Sorry to see you go. It always pains me to see helpful users like you leave due to the poor contributing environment. There might be a day when I'll tire of the negative atmosphere enough to retire too. Good luck, anyway. Feel free to ping me on any other WMF project anytime if you need help. Tempodivalse [talk]  15:00, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Retired
I'm sorry to see you go. Hopefully your burnout will fix itself in a couple of months, and you'll be back:). Gopher65talk 15:08, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Ditto. Diego Grez return fire 16:17, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Yurtletturtle


text: User talk:Shellie911

title: User talk:Shellie911


text: User talk:Covivek

title: User talk:Covivek


text: User talk:Colinue

title: User talk:Colinue


text: User talk:Pownerus

title: User talk:Pownerus


text: User talk:Supender singh

title: User talk:Supender singh


text: User talk:Sawtguren

title: User talk:Sawtguren


text: User talk:Matadoorfox

title: User talk:Matadoorfox


text: User talk:Njoftime Durres

title: User talk:Njoftime Durres


text: User talk:太刻薄

title: User talk:太刻薄


text: User talk:Andrey montero

title: User talk:Andrey montero


text: User talk:Hattiethecat1234

title: User talk:Hattiethecat1234


text: User talk:Arikawa5715

title: User talk:Arikawa5715


text: User talk:Pierre Mendoza

title: User talk:Pierre Mendoza


text:
Much of inland New South Wales, Australia affected by flooding

December 5, 2010

Much of the interior of New South Wales, Australia continues to be affected by floods caused by heavy rains. With more rain predicted, the has issued a flood watch for all western flowing rivers in New South Wales from the  in the north of the state to the  in the south.

, in the central-western plains district of New South Wales, has been isolated by major flooding of the. The State Emergency Service estimates that around 2,760 people are currently trapped in Coonamble. ,, , , , and have also been severely affected.

A number of major highways in Western districts of the state have been closed or had diversions put in place, including the near Mirrool Bridge, the  between  and, the  between Gilgandra and Warren, and the  between 28km north of  and 6km South Of. A number of local roads have also been affected.

Emergency Management NSW has declared the local government areas of Mid-Western Region, Weddin, Wellington, Warrumbungle, Cootamundra, Coonamble, Harden, and Young as natural disaster areas where significant damage to property and infrastructure has occurred.

Evacuation orders have been issued for parts of and parts of Coonamble due to flooding.

The SES is advising people who require assistance due to flooding to call 132 500 and to contact 000 for life threatening emergencies. For road closure information, residents are encouraged to contact their local council.


text: User talk:Pirusl

title: User talk:Pirusl


text:
Talk:Much of inland New South Wales, Australia affected by flooding

Original reporting
Written solely from government released information - Cartman02au (Talk)(AU Portal) 03:03, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Review of revision 1140043 [Failed]

 * I believe much of the issues should now be addressed. A natural disaster declaration is given when there has been significant damage to property and infrastructure, see this for the assistance which is provided as a result of such a declaration. I am unable to locate a precise definition but my understanding is that significant damage has to of occured for a declaration to be made - Cartman02au (Talk)(AU Portal) 06:58, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Second reviewer needed
I think I have made enough changes to this article to warrant someone else to review it instead of me. Bobby122  Contact Me   (C)  16:26, 5 December 2010 (UTC)


text:
Talk:UK Parliament to vote on tuition fee rise on Thursday

Minor correction
editprotected 'bath' should be capitalized: 'Bath'. —Tom Morris (talk) 10:54, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ — μ 09:17, 2 April 2011 (UTC)


text: Comments:UK Parliament to vote on tuition fee rise on Thursday


text: User talk:高映霞

title: User talk:高映霞


text: User talk:Vgyu

title: User talk:Vgyu


text: User talk:Ll1324

title: User talk:Ll1324


text: User talk:Krisalezx94

title: User talk:Krisalezx94


text: User talk:Indigobolt22

title: User talk:Indigobolt22


text: User talk:Srv suman

title: User talk:Srv suman


text: User talk:Ben mojally

title: User talk:Ben mojally


text: User talk:Nanobytecomputers

title: User talk:Nanobytecomputers


text: User talk:MathematicsNerd

title: User talk:MathematicsNerd


text: User talk:ArieScheurwater

title: User talk:ArieScheurwater


text: User talk:Hakim Bamba

title: User talk:Hakim Bamba


text: User talk:RestaurantKASHMIR

title: User talk:RestaurantKASHMIR


text: User talk:Sryanan

title: User talk:Sryanan


text: User talk:Ehrflq157

title: User talk:Ehrflq157


text: User talk:Eleph bt

title: User talk:Eleph bt


text: User talk:Cascade1997

title: User talk:Cascade1997


text: User talk:Wikiluo

title: User talk:Wikiluo


text: User talk:Cypher1324

title: User talk:Cypher1324


text: User talk:Ksikand

title: User talk:Ksikand


text: User talk:RuiVieira1981

title: User talk:RuiVieira1981


text: User talk:Harmony87

title: User talk:Harmony87


text: User talk:Vitin8

title: User talk:Vitin8


text: User talk:Lunixer

title: User talk:Lunixer


text: User talk:Krunal-NJITWILL

title: User talk:Krunal-NJITWILL


text: User talk:Janggeum

title: User talk:Janggeum


text: User talk:Kharahari

title: User talk:Kharahari


text: User talk:Astro98

title: User talk:Astro98


text: User talk:Arijit suvo

title: User talk:Arijit suvo


text: User talk:KOP-SEE

title: User talk:KOP-SEE


text: User talk:Mari.menari

title: User talk:Mari.menari


text: User talk:Yuluoqingchi

title: User talk:Yuluoqingchi


text: User talk:Leonard clarke

title: User talk:Leonard clarke


text: User talk:Chaman1985

title: User talk:Chaman1985


text: User talk:Davidnasution

title: User talk:Davidnasution


text: User talk:123asdewwef

title: User talk:123asdewwef


text: User talk:Ibrahim mohamme

title: User talk:Ibrahim mohamme


text: User talk:Hood501

title: User talk:Hood501


text: User talk:Damian Adrian

title: User talk:Damian Adrian


text: User talk:Wan mohamad anas

title: User talk:Wan mohamad anas


text: User talk:Nagen.tairai

title: User talk:Nagen.tairai


text: User talk:XiaoV 2006

title: User talk:XiaoV 2006


text: User talk:Santosociplek

title: User talk:Santosociplek


text: User talk:Hhchu

title: User talk:Hhchu


text: User talk:Samtad007

title: User talk:Samtad007


text: User talk:Masood Matin

title: User talk:Masood Matin


text: User talk:Maxvelt2

title: User talk:Maxvelt2


text: User talk:Folake Amanda

title: User talk:Folake Amanda


text: User talk:Sajan Aboobaker

title: User talk:Sajan Aboobaker


text: User talk:Pitbull303

title: User talk:Pitbull303


text: User talk:Dbuias

title: User talk:Dbuias


text: User talk:Ms0101746

title: User talk:Ms0101746


text: User talk:Torfabrik

title: User talk:Torfabrik


text: User talk:Ad030233

title: User talk:Ad030233


text: User talk:Pawzzz

title: User talk:Pawzzz


text: User talk:あっつぁん

title: User talk:あっつぁん


text: User talk:Hongvutan

title: User talk:Hongvutan


text: User talk:TommasoDS

title: User talk:TommasoDS


text: User talk:Jamsecret

title: User talk:Jamsecret


text:
Thread:Comments:Latest 'CableGate' disclosures hint at US diplomatic tactics in Spain and beyond/Comments from feedback form - "only in america"

only in america


text: User talk:ZingmanP

title: User talk:ZingmanP


text: User talk:TalentandSkills

title: User talk:TalentandSkills


text: User talk:Ericnichols

title: User talk:Ericnichols


text: User talk:HanifNelita

title: User talk:HanifNelita


text: User talk:Julia pascal

title: User talk:Julia pascal


text: User talk:Dronit462

title: User talk:Dronit462


text: User talk:Glantiwehene

title: User talk:Glantiwehene


text: User talk:Bidi1961

title: User talk:Bidi1961


text: User talk:St0318

title: User talk:St0318


text: User talk:Reamonq

title: User talk:Reamonq


text: User talk:Chanzeelbarbary

title: User talk:Chanzeelbarbary


text: User talk:Brandtjones

title: User talk:Brandtjones


text: User talk:Akad1070

title: User talk:Akad1070


text: User talk:MiguelSnake

title: User talk:MiguelSnake


text: User talk:JAK0723

title: User talk:JAK0723


text: User talk:Yujunelee

title: User talk:Yujunelee


text: User talk:Sabaku The Berserk

title: User talk:Sabaku The Berserk


text: User talk:Ahmadidrus

title: User talk:Ahmadidrus


text: User talk:Blub08

title: User talk:Blub08


text: User talk:Wolfer18

title: User talk:Wolfer18


text:
User talk:Terado

Welcome
Thanks for experimenting with Wikinews. Your test worked, and has now been reverted or removed. Please use Sandbox for any other tests you want to do, since testing in articles may disrupt the site's working and will be reverted quickly. , welcome to Wikinews! Please refrain from using content pages for testing. Here are a few good links for newcomers on how to edit Wikinews:

Our key policies - if you read anything, read these! Here a few pointers to help you get to know Wikinews: There are always things to do on Wikinews: By the way, you can sign your name on Talk pages using four tildes ( ~~~~ ), which produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, you can ask them at the water cooler or to anyone on the Welcommittee, or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! Gopher65talk 13:14, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Neutral point of view - tell every side to a story in a fair and balanced way
 * Cite sources - everything in a Wikinews article must be sourced
 * Introduction - overview of the site
 * Writing an article - how to write and publish a complete article
 * Content guide - what's suitable for Wikinews
 * Style guide - how an article should look before publishing
 * Contents - the contents page.
 * Existing articles need expanding and checking for spelling and mistakes
 * The front page lead articles often need updating
 * Developing stories need finishing and publishing
 * Discussions need your input
 * And of course, stories need writing!

title: User talk:Terado


text: User talk:Yoseph Yapi Taum

title: User talk:Yoseph Yapi Taum


text: User talk:Biro94

title: User talk:Biro94


text: User talk:Ethelbirth A. Sangma

title: User talk:Ethelbirth A. Sangma


text: User talk:JohanvdSande

title: User talk:JohanvdSande


text: User talk:Vineymalhotra

title: User talk:Vineymalhotra


text: User talk:Iblis17

title: User talk:Iblis17


text: User talk:Abubaka

title: User talk:Abubaka


text: User talk:Sonic-hero

title: User talk:Sonic-hero


text: User talk:Nydybody

title: User talk:Nydybody


text: User talk:Keneth2

title: User talk:Keneth2


text: User talk:ArchiveSpot

title: User talk:ArchiveSpot


text: User talk:らぼるぺ

title: User talk:らぼるぺ


text: User talk:Lcc152

title: User talk:Lcc152


text: User talk:Kumaran Supaya

title: User talk:Kumaran Supaya


text: User talk:TehVD

title: User talk:TehVD


text: User talk:Bellavista1957

title: User talk:Bellavista1957


text: User talk:Tarun5353

title: User talk:Tarun5353


text: User talk:Сергей ХМАО

title: User talk:Сергей ХМАО


text: User talk:Sourabh619

title: User talk:Sourabh619


text: User talk:Nokodenkun

title: User talk:Nokodenkun


text: User talk:Balerian

title: User talk:Balerian


text: User talk:Gurumurthi

title: User talk:Gurumurthi


text: User talk:Percypotter.cullen

title: User talk:Percypotter.cullen


text: User talk:Leohermans

title: User talk:Leohermans


text: User talk:Damanraghav

title: User talk:Damanraghav


text: User talk:Avi 211

title: User talk:Avi 211


text: User talk:Zum93

title: User talk:Zum93


text: User talk:Rahulgulati2

title: User talk:Rahulgulati2


text: User talk:I.Song520

title: User talk:I.Song520


text: User talk:Nicolaeme1212

title: User talk:Nicolaeme1212


text: User talk:Ashvini Mehra

title: User talk:Ashvini Mehra


text: User talk:Angelaamato

title: User talk:Angelaamato


text: User talk:Rand Herz

title: User talk:Rand Herz


text: User talk:Catalinechita68

title: User talk:Catalinechita68


text: User talk:KieuNhi Kute

title: User talk:KieuNhi Kute


text: User talk:Franco.pupeschi

title: User talk:Franco.pupeschi


text: User talk:حيدر ماجد

title: User talk:حيدر ماجد


text: User talk:Ayeowch

title: User talk:Ayeowch


text: User talk:Webtel

title: User talk:Webtel


text: User talk:SandKing

title: User talk:SandKing


text: User talk:Yegor Morozov

title: User talk:Yegor Morozov


text: User talk:Wikiii122

title: User talk:Wikiii122


text: User talk:Chyhui

title: User talk:Chyhui


text: User talk:Stringsandflute777

title: User talk:Stringsandflute777


text: User talk:KaoS86KaoS

title: User talk:KaoS86KaoS


text: User talk:Tjahebro

title: User talk:Tjahebro


text: User talk:Yrudnoiv

title: User talk:Yrudnoiv


text: User talk:Adaj

title: User talk:Adaj


text: User talk:Billgic

title: User talk:Billgic


text: User talk:Utku kaya

title: User talk:Utku kaya


text: User talk:Leeki29

title: User talk:Leeki29


text: User talk:Jack0460

title: User talk:Jack0460


text: User talk:Mymailstarted

title: User talk:Mymailstarted


text: User talk:BQmUB2010162

title: User talk:BQmUB2010162


text: User talk:Kaprikka

title: User talk:Kaprikka


text: User talk:Namal Valley

title: User talk:Namal Valley


text: User talk:Qloroplast

title: User talk:Qloroplast


text:
Thread:Comments:UK Parliament to vote on tuition fee rise on Thursday/Link to NCAFC

You can Wikipedia add a link to the National Campaign Against Fees and Cuts (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Campaign_Against_Fees_and_Cuts)


text:
Thread:Comments:'Completely irresponsible' woman called emergency services to report theft of snowman/999?/reply (7)

112 was in use in a few European countries, and then written into the GSM standard. That is why access to it is so widespread. It was even codified in mobile standards that the number should be reachable without a SIM in a phone.

999 is the very-long-established emergency services number in the UK. This was established pre-switched phone networks, at a time when rotary dial phones were all you had and pulse dialling was the standard - on both sides of the Atlantic. 111 was not used (the fastest number to dial on a rotary phone) because telegraph lines, clattering together in the wind, could accidentally dial 111.


text: User talk:Hbortman

title: User talk:Hbortman


text: User talk:GmHyder1952

title: User talk:GmHyder1952


text: User talk:Gurwindersingh

title: User talk:Gurwindersingh


text: User talk:Fabrictramp(public)

title: User talk:Fabrictramp(public)


text: User talk:Uma40sankar

title: User talk:Uma40sankar


text: User talk:Abhi2810

title: User talk:Abhi2810


text: User talk:Vyvyanangharad

title: User talk:Vyvyanangharad


text: User talk:Shirkeom90

title: User talk:Shirkeom90


text: User talk:Djebloun1

title: User talk:Djebloun1


text: User talk:Jbfbell

title: User talk:Jbfbell


text: User talk:Added Mind

title: User talk:Added Mind


text:
Thread:Comments:British warship HMS Invincible put up for auction online/What's left?/reply (2)

I am stunned that 4chan has not got on this.


text: User talk:RLMapes

title: User talk:RLMapes


text: User talk:Amchmth

title: User talk:Amchmth


text: User talk:Міф

title: User talk:Міф


text: User talk:The.dead.roach159

title: User talk:The.dead.roach159


text: User talk:Felixde

title: User talk:Felixde


text: Comments:Much of inland New South Wales, Australia affected by flooding


text: User talk:Dsuraci

title: User talk:Dsuraci


text: User talk:Shahrzad.aziminia

title: User talk:Shahrzad.aziminia


text: User talk:Nimesh Rai

title: User talk:Nimesh Rai


text: User talk:Young-scientist1

title: User talk:Young-scientist1


text: User talk:Soorajrathore1

title: User talk:Soorajrathore1


text: User talk:Dschargel

title: User talk:Dschargel


text: User talk:Queenmaya99

title: User talk:Queenmaya99


text: User talk:Dieguen

title: User talk:Dieguen


text: User talk:Kâtib

title: User talk:Kâtib


text: User talk:Asterben

title: User talk:Asterben


text: User talk:Fk3830

title: User talk:Fk3830


text: User talk:Daraamaher

title: User talk:Daraamaher


text: User talk:Maite99

title: User talk:Maite99


text: User talk:GoDakaPIAN

title: User talk:GoDakaPIAN


text: User talk:Nandor.makkai

title: User talk:Nandor.makkai


text: User talk:Johnhg7

title: User talk:Johnhg7


text: User talk:Jahnavijay

title: User talk:Jahnavijay


text: User talk:Alex bstu 88

title: User talk:Alex bstu 88


text: User talk:Connoreharris

title: User talk:Connoreharris


text: User talk:DIANMIRI

title: User talk:DIANMIRI


text: User talk:Chasgad

title: User talk:Chasgad


text: User talk:Snookerfan

title: User talk:Snookerfan


text: User talk:Mssnut

title: User talk:Mssnut


text: User talk:The Philisopher

title: User talk:The Philisopher


text: User talk:Labaki mohamed

title: User talk:Labaki mohamed


text: User talk:MOGottlieb

title: User talk:MOGottlieb


text: User talk:Malatra

title: User talk:Malatra


text: User talk:Auston Bevins

title: User talk:Auston Bevins


text: User talk:Cesarusandoval

title: User talk:Cesarusandoval


text: User talk:Evakuados

title: User talk:Evakuados


text: User talk:Maharapkir01

title: User talk:Maharapkir01


text: User talk:Gossipguy

title: User talk:Gossipguy


text: User talk:DrZygote214

title: User talk:DrZygote214


text:
User talk:Adambro/Archive 5

commons:Image:LaytonPortrait.jpg
tsia. -  Amgine | t 03:13, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

excuse me, but wikipedia told me you deleted my contribution. i did not appreciate that, and for your information, AFTER i finished it i wouldn't have cared, but it's an assignment form my biology teacher where i have to Prepare a wikipedia eyewitness report of a photosynthesis interview with a leaf and it's chloroplast. all i wanted was for the report to be done as a contribution to wikipedia so it would look professional.67.203.209.181 16:37, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

look dude. im in highschool, it's something im doing for my biology class, and it's required. thanks for deleting it...67.203.209.181 16:39, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

User:Tempodivalse/Writing contest
Hallo! Would you like to join an article writing/reviewing contest that I started? We need more people to join up. If you're interested, drop a line at the above link. Thanks! ♪Tempo di Valse ♪ 14:29, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Time-specific H1N1 maps
Can you help out with this? I'm having trouble getting the versions out of the history. I've identified the articles that need new versions
 * Swine flu reported in more countries; WHO warns of possible pandemic risk
 * Swine flu outbreaks appear globally; WHO raises pandemic alert level to 5
 * Swine flu worldwide: update
 * U.S. pork plant in Mexico near confirmed case of swine flu
 * Swine flu cases worldwide top 1,000

There was another, but I removed the image from it because the article was published before the image was created. The version duplicated should match with the publication time, could pick through article content to check against the image but I think that's probably excessive. --Brian McNeil / talk 12:16, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Sure, I'll get those sorted based upon the publishing time or slightly later if appropriate based upon any updates. I'll have a quick read of the article to try to make sure the image reflects what the text says. Adambro (talk) 12:54, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * ✅ all except U.S. pork plant in Mexico near confirmed case of swine flu since it isn't published yet and might not be considering it has been abandoned once already. If/when it is a static copy of both of the images used should be made in the same way as the other ones. I'll keep it on my watchlist and do this when necessary. Adambro (talk) 13:42, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks Adam. --Brian McNeil / talk 15:13, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Commons accreditation
I don't know if you follow the WMUK mailing list, but I brought up skenmy's idea for a security printer there. As added justification for the expense, and per an issue you seem to have with some requests here, I brought up a suggestion for something on Commons.

Yes, technically it should go all the way to meta for this, but building it on a few projects first gives the impetus to take it there.

Can I ask you to look on this favourably and perhaps pass comment on the section I've added to the village pump on Commons? --Brian McNeil / talk 17:35, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Bots discussion
As someone listed as having an active bot I would like to draw your attention to the following issue. This may not affect you unless your bot edits sighted pages - eg in the Template namespace - but as a bot operator your input is likely to be better informed. --Brian McNeil / talk 09:29, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Adambro (talk) 12:22, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Vestas occupiers inside.png
It's CC-BY-NC-2.0, that's perfectly fine under WN fair use rules as I understand it. What's wrong? --Killing Vector (talk) 13:41, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * An image is either freely licensed (public domain, CC-BY, CC-BY-SA, etc.) or unfree. CC-BY-NC falls into the latter category. As such, the fact that it is available under the CC-BY-NC licence is irrelevant, it is simply an unfree image and like all unfree images to be used on Wikinews requires a solid fair use rationale explaining why a free alternative couldn't be found or created to show the same information. In this instance, it would be perfectly feasible for someone to go along and photograph the ongoing event or ask for someone who has already done so to consider releasing their image under an accepted free licence. Therefore it isn't possible to justify using this unfree image under fair use. I fear that similar problems exist with One shop defies court order, one shop returns to work in Dublin Thomas Cook occupation. Adambro (talk) 13:53, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * That's an unreasonably high standard; yes, potentially "someone" could travel halfway across the country to get a photo of what's going on there now; such a photo would not be equivalent. user:SVTCobra approved of my upload of the Thomas Cook photo on IRC. --Killing Vector (talk) 13:58, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I did what? When? --SVTCobra 14:04, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure what approval Killing Vector may or may not have had but the Thomas Cook photo currently violates WN policies. It is not free and so can only be used under fair use but lacks a rationale explaining why it wasn't possible to find or create a freely licensed alternative. Adambro (talk) 14:05, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I agree, it needs a rationale. But I have never seen or heard of that photo until five minutes ago. --SVTCobra 14:07, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * On IRC, you said you'd back me up. --Killing Vector (talk) 14:09, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * When? What are you talking about? I haven't been on IRC in the last 12 hours. Please just use non-free use rationale to help you write a rationale for the image. --SVTCobra 14:11, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * For the Thomas Cook photo, that wasn't in the last 12 hours, that was a few days ago. --Killing Vector (talk) 14:15, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Isn't the Thomas Cook photo on Commons? So there's nothing to talk about. --SVTCobra 14:18, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The image in question can be found at File:Thomas Cook protest.jpg. Adambro (talk) 14:19, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Oh this File:Thomas Cook protest.jpg one. Don't remember talking about it, but it needs a rationale. It is easy with the template. --SVTCobra 14:20, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Right, I've put the rationales in, is everything fine now? --Killing Vector (talk) 14:27, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Please familiarise yourself with the fair use policy. It concerns me that you've apparently not yet done so. Adambro (talk) 14:29, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I added the information required, I just added it incorrectly. I humbly apologize. Beyond that, we simply disagree on interpretation of the policy. --Killing Vector (talk) 14:35, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * "Any use not covered by this whitelist is not allowed". Where do the whitelist allow images such as this one? This is hardly a minor disagreement on how to interpret the policy, you seem to be ignoring it. Adambro (talk) 14:41, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I interpret it in a way that lets us actually write news. The way it was explained to me, the underlying principle under all of this was to ensure we don't get sued; I've ensured that by only using CC images, under the terms of the CC license -- where is the breach of copyright? Your interpretation, meanwhile, seems to contain a great big hole; we can use copyrighted non-free images under grants of license, but somehow we can't use CC images? Finally, you raise an unreasonably high standard, as I mentioned above, for equivalent images -- that is, where you assert that just because someone could potentially truck out to the Isle of Wight and take a similar photo themselves, the hypothetical existence of some different work depicting some different moment in time is a reasonable substitute for the actual, licensed image that we have here. Yes, I am aware of the text on the page; but you know very well that practice is entirely different. I'm following the standard set in practice that lets us do journalism. --Killing Vector (talk) 15:00, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * You shouldn't be ignoring policies. The fair use policy is not simply about ensuring we don't get sued. It is about limiting the amount of unfree content we use in line with the actual core aims of the project to create freely licensed news articles. Using unfree content except in very limited circumstances isn't compatible with these aims nor the foundation:Resolution:Licensing policy. I'm not sure what gives you the impression that I've suggested we can use images under a grants of license. This certainly isn't my position. What you seem to forget is that this project isn't simply about the collaborative authoring of news articles, we are supposed to be creating content that is reusable under an accepted free licence. This is restriction within which we have to work. Adambro (talk) 15:22, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * If the consensus of the community doesn't reflect the words on the screen with regard to policy then I will follow the consensus of the community. The consensus of the community certainly supports images; if you oppose these then you're against consensus in that case as well. Now, as I've already said, I don't object to using inferior free substitutes when they're adequate; I've used such substitutes in the past. In the case of these two photos, there are not free substitutes available. If you don't think those photos should be there, then propose their deletion. I do feel, though, that you're taking an impractical and fringy position with regard to the policy. --Killing Vector (talk) 15:37, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

ru:Template:Weather World C
Hi. May your bot update this template for Russian Wikinews too? — putnik 14:46, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I will investigate whether that is possible and keep you informed of my progress. Adambro (talk) 14:52, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I will wait your answer. — putnik 16:56, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
 * And if you do not mind I may copy scripts and run my bot using your data. — putnik 17:10, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I run my bot with modified version of your script and your data. Thanks. =) You may see my version at /home/putnik/ru_news/weather.py. And one thing that may be usefull for other languages:  changes "Augusto C. Sandino International Airport (MNMG)" too, I use replacement for 'UTC August' instead. — putnik 00:15, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

C and F
Your bot can update this page?--Reality006 (talk) 11:51, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Should be able to. I'll look into it and let you know. Adambro (talk) 11:52, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

 * Had to make some new changes. Page was forced to change names, please excuse me. New pages are C and F. If you appreciate your help to be updated.--Reality006 (talk) 21:51, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Recruiting Commoners/ making things easier for photographers
I don't know if you'd seen ShakataGaNai's suggestion that we alter priorities a little when a report is predominantly a 'photoessay'. Essentially, he wants to drop the requirement for a minimum of three paragraphs and just insist on enough to put an event in context. There's a start on an essay on this where I think you could offer valuable input.

I'd like to see this shaped up, then highlighted on Commons in some way such that photographers over there might consider doing reports to showcase their pictures. --Brian McNeil / talk 09:12, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Interwikis
Hi, Just see Regards, Otourly (talk) 16:31, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

World Weather Map
Could you lunch something like that on polish Wikinews? And what do You need to do that? We used commons' maps but now it is out of date - look. --Krzysiu Jarzyna (talk) 17:45, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Thank you
For the link. :) --Soy Rebelde (talk) 10:57, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

My Pages
Thanks for reminding me... I could delete them but Thank you so much!

--Firefox6297 (talk) 19:37, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

They can be deleted in a minute. there is 3. That's why im saying they.

Admin rights
I request that my admin rights here are removed. Adambro (talk) 12:23, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I have set the protection level on your userpage to autoconfirmed. Hopefully this will keep any vandalism down while still allowing you to update the page at your leisure. Cases like this just add further evidence that my idea for an optional universal userpage for global accounts would be awesome:). Gopher65talk 13:02, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your assistance. Adambro (talk) 13:03, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Restored file?
Adambro, Why did you restore File:Toad on highway.jpg (back in 2008)? It seems to be a replaceable non-free image, of the kind that we can speedily delete. Should I open a DR, or go ahead and delete it again? --InfantGorilla (talk) 13:51, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

 * From a brief look at this issue, I think I deleted it due to concerns about the licensing situation and then someone raised concerns about the deletion of that and images with similar issues and requested they were undeleted (see here). Consensus seemed to go against me so I reinstated the image. I still think it should be deleted but it might be wise to raise it for wider discussion. Adambro (talk) 21:55, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

 * Ok. Its on my to do list.  --InfantGorilla (talk) 08:40, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Weather Portal
Hi, I want to make Weather Portal in Persian wikinews can you update it with your robot please Mjbmr   10:06, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Or Please Guide me, i will update with my robot Mjbmr   14:48, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

title: User talk:Adambro/Archive 5


text: User talk:Rapel

title: User talk:Rapel


text: User talk:Dickchen

title: User talk:Dickchen


text: User talk:Fontenoy69

title: User talk:Fontenoy69


text: User talk:Jmrodri2

title: User talk:Jmrodri2


text: User talk:Fernandommm

title: User talk:Fernandommm


text: User talk:טישיו

title: User talk:טישיו


text: User talk:PhysicsAboveAll

title: User talk:PhysicsAboveAll


text: User talk:Jmfriedman

title: User talk:Jmfriedman


text: User talk:Lacpsyd

title: User talk:Lacpsyd


text: User talk:Picklezx3

title: User talk:Picklezx3


text:
Thread:Comments:'Completely irresponsible' woman called emergency services to report theft of snowman/Police describe woman who reports the theft of two pounds and some cuttlery as "totally irresponsible".

There needs to be some clarification of the monetary threshold above which it is no longer an offense to report a theft.


text: User talk:Jigar.dafda

title: User talk:Jigar.dafda


text: User talk:Akwyoung

title: User talk:Akwyoung


text:
Thread:Comments:'Completely irresponsible' woman called emergency services to report theft of snowman/Police describe woman who reports the theft of two pounds and some cuttlery as "totally irresponsible"./reply

~£∞

It is not the report, but what number she dialed - the emergency number. Theft of, at a push, £5 in cash and goods anything up to five hours ago is not an emergency.


text: User talk:Piotr wielko

title: User talk:Piotr wielko


text: User talk:Jane Cool

title: User talk:Jane Cool


text:
Blast kills seven in China

December 7, 2010

Seven people were killed and 37 were injured Saturday night at an Internet cafe in the southwest region of China's, after the explosion of chemicals being stored illegally at a chemical shop.

Chinese state media reported that, , and other chemicals were being kept in a nearby chemical shop and exploded at about 11:05 pm local time (1505 UTC), causing the Internet cafe to catch on fire. It is unknown how the chemicals ignited.

Forty five people were in the cafe when the explosion occurred. Six people died on the scene while one woman suffered major burns and later died in hospital. One person escaped without injury.

The police detained the owner of the chemical shop for "illegal possession of chemicals" according to state media. The cafe manager and boss were also placed in police custody for questioning.

 reports that one of the bodies was that of a child. Children under the age of eighteen are not allowed in Internet cafes under Chinese law.

According to Li Feiyue of the Qiandongnan Miao-Dong Autonomous Prefecture, "The location and environment of the Internet cafe is not safe. We will find out who approved its operation and who was in charge of safety supervision. They will be held responsible."

Residential buildings in the area also suffered damaged.

title: Blast kills seven in China


text: User talk:Mehtas2

title: User talk:Mehtas2


text: User talk:Martin Alonzo

title: User talk:Martin Alonzo


text: User talk:Wontolla1

title: User talk:Wontolla1


text: User talk:Ayalewyonas

title: User talk:Ayalewyonas


text: User talk:FPCP

title: User talk:FPCP


text: User talk:CostaPPPR

title: User talk:CostaPPPR


text: User talk:Oltre luna

title: User talk:Oltre luna


text: User talk:吉永博昭

title: User talk:吉永博昭


text: User talk:Mian.tariq17

title: User talk:Mian.tariq17


text: User talk:Pet777

title: User talk:Pet777


text: User talk:Ouqz

title: User talk:Ouqz


text: User talk:Aragorn135

title: User talk:Aragorn135


text: User talk:Pi.1415926535

title: User talk:Pi.1415926535


text: User talk:Alexandrapp

title: User talk:Alexandrapp


text: User talk:Pavilac

title: User talk:Pavilac


text:
Thread:Comments:Wikileaks to release thousands of secret documents; 'international embarrassment' likely/Comments from feedback form - "Keep it up."

Keep it up.


text: User talk:Bruinfan3.14

title: User talk:Bruinfan3.14


text: User talk:Javipincha

title: User talk:Javipincha


text: User talk:Scubadiver102

title: User talk:Scubadiver102


text: User talk:Frank Nordberg

title: User talk:Frank Nordberg


text: User talk:Macius8

title: User talk:Macius8


text:
Thread:Comments:Interpol orders arrest of Wikileaks founder to face rape charges/Comments from feedback form - "(I don't know what reliability..."

(I don't know what reliability give to the news)


text: User talk:Melitax

title: User talk:Melitax


text: User talk:Christbrown

title: User talk:Christbrown


text: User talk:Mikeatnip

title: User talk:Mikeatnip


text: User talk:Wkboonec

title: User talk:Wkboonec


text: User talk:Stimp7

title: User talk:Stimp7


text: User talk:Grindean

title: User talk:Grindean


text: User talk:Mconst

title: User talk:Mconst


text: User talk:N777

title: User talk:N777


text: User talk:Yoga 89 Records

title: User talk:Yoga 89 Records


text: User talk:Zoekara

title: User talk:Zoekara


text: User talk:Intellec7

title: User talk:Intellec7


text: User talk:Baser1980

title: User talk:Baser1980


text: User talk:Hiphopowiec

title: User talk:Hiphopowiec


text: User talk:Netmedia

title: User talk:Netmedia


text: User talk:Elramli

title: User talk:Elramli


text: User talk:Carloshvp

title: User talk:Carloshvp


text: User talk:Phuonghan 2408

title: User talk:Phuonghan 2408


text: User talk:Kingkongfour

title: User talk:Kingkongfour


text: User talk:MOVIMIENTO REVOLUCIONARIO SIGLO XXI


text: User talk:Dev2390

title: User talk:Dev2390


text:
Thread:Comments:Interpol orders arrest of Wikileaks founder to face rape charges/wiki leaks founder/reply (8)

oh you silly conservative sheeple, you lot will believe anything coming from the government's mouth.


text: User talk:Syphon33

title: User talk:Syphon33


text: User talk:RonLCohen

title: User talk:RonLCohen


text: User talk:Levakz

title: User talk:Levakz


text: User talk:Galt.jesse

title: User talk:Galt.jesse


text: User talk:Inatwinkling

title: User talk:Inatwinkling


text: User talk:十年一觉扬州梦

title: User talk:十年一觉扬州梦


text: User talk:Tikicrow

title: User talk:Tikicrow


text: User talk:Koolkidz69

title: User talk:Koolkidz69


text:
Thread:Comments:Interpol orders arrest of Wikileaks founder to face rape charges/wiki leaks founder/reply (9)

It certainly appears that Wikinews dba Wikipedia are quite sympathetic to Julian Assange. DO NOT DONATE TO WIKIPEDIA


text: User talk:さとっちゃん

title: User talk:さとっちゃん


text: User talk:Semperphil

title: User talk:Semperphil


text: User talk:Yathavaprakash

title: User talk:Yathavaprakash


text:
User talk:Noemi~enwikinews

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Noemi. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Noemi~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:22, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:35, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Noemi~enwikinews


text: User talk:DECCmng

title: User talk:DECCmng


text: User talk:Editor182

title: User talk:Editor182


text: User talk:Tangt2010

title: User talk:Tangt2010


text: User talk:Alik.ulmasov

title: User talk:Alik.ulmasov


text: User talk:Alfatunisa

title: User talk:Alfatunisa


text: User talk:Yoav arri

title: User talk:Yoav arri


text: User talk:Blaren

title: User talk:Blaren


text: User talk:Elainewestwood

title: User talk:Elainewestwood


text: User talk:Josephf

title: User talk:Josephf


text: User talk:Darkramborises

title: User talk:Darkramborises


text: User talk:340stonequarry

title: User talk:340stonequarry


text: User talk:Loapd2

title: User talk:Loapd2


text: User talk:Miracleworx2010

title: User talk:Miracleworx2010


text: User talk:Joaquindiaz87

title: User talk:Joaquindiaz87


text:
Thread:Comments:British government scraps planned rules on pay equality/Details/reply (3)

Not to mention that poorly thought-out equality laws that to less women being preferred over men reinforce the social stigma surrounding women and the stereotypes that label them as needy princesses or as inferior to men. Pay isn't everything, and we need to be sure that the laws aren't just getting women more money at the expense of harming them in the eyes of their coworkers and society. If equality is going to work out for us, as a society, then we have to show those who aren't convinced that it's about equal skill = equal pay, not just equal pay. What's important is that employers make their choices as though they didn't know the employee's gender (except in those rare cases where gender is part of the job requirement, like acting), not as though they're trying to comply with gender equality laws just for the sake of the law.


text: User talk:MrSmesher

title: User talk:MrSmesher


text:
User talk:Ray~enwikinews

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Ray. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Ray~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:24, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:36, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ray~enwikinews


text: User talk:Jemeelaa

title: User talk:Jemeelaa


text: User talk:Ahmed irfan

title: User talk:Ahmed irfan


text: User talk:Kunal982

title: User talk:Kunal982


text: User talk:Nyccfbfan

title: User talk:Nyccfbfan


text: User talk:Nguyenkim2

title: User talk:Nguyenkim2


text: User talk:Naser sweden

title: User talk:Naser sweden


text: User talk:Zdziseq

title: User talk:Zdziseq


text: User talk:Mevadaviral

title: User talk:Mevadaviral


text: User talk:Guru9210958689

title: User talk:Guru9210958689


text: User talk:Fajarprasaja

title: User talk:Fajarprasaja


text: User talk:Thien 3292

title: User talk:Thien 3292


text: User talk:Quiop55

title: User talk:Quiop55


text: User talk:Thezank

title: User talk:Thezank


text: User talk:Qmpstudios

title: User talk:Qmpstudios


text: User talk:Andrew Martin Auto Group

title: User talk:Andrew Martin Auto Group


text:
Leaked cables cause Australian concern

December 10, 2010

Leaked diplomatic cables between Australia and the US Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, have raised controversy in the Australian community. The documents were released by the whistle-blowing website Wikileaks. The cables between the then prime minister of Australia, Kevin Rudd, and the US Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, revealed that China may need to be forced to integrate into the international community. The secret documents also contained information of a conversation between Clinton and Rudd in Washington. In the interview, Rudd stated that China was "paranoid" about Taiwan and Tibet.

The sensitive documents may place a strain on diplomatic relations between Australia and China. Despite this, Kevin Rudd reassured the public that the "robust" relationship between Australia and China wouldn't sustain any substantial damage to the relations between the two countries. At this stage, Prime Minister Julia Gillard has provided no further comment on the matter, other than to ensure that the relationship between China and Australia would allow opinions to be expressed without any threat to either side.

At the heart of the leaks is Australian founder, Julian Assange. Wikileaks have now released 821 of their promised 251,287 US diplomatic cables. The cables are being released on a stage-by-stage basis. Earlier this week, Assange was arrested on suspicion of rape in London under a Swedish arrest warrant placed on him from a court in Stockholm on November 18.

title: Leaked cables cause Australian concern


text: User talk:Blt001

title: User talk:Blt001


text: User talk:Ashwindinesh

title: User talk:Ashwindinesh


text:
Thread:Comments:Portuguese writer José Saramago dies at 87/Comments from feedback form - "ok!"

ok!


text: User talk:Tush1r

title: User talk:Tush1r


text: User talk:Kwhinnery

title: User talk:Kwhinnery


text: User talk:Imnodamselindistress

title: User talk:Imnodamselindistress


text: User talk:Ganeshran

title: User talk:Ganeshran


text: User talk:Arpanaalka

title: User talk:Arpanaalka


text:
Talk:Leaked cables cause Australian concern

Review of revision 1142677 [Failed]
I have created a new headline. Could you also please clarify what parts of the article need to be changed for POV? Thanks ~YTT (talk)

Review of revision 1142771 [Passed]
The article was not edited when this passing review was registered on the talk page. It seems clear that a valid review did take place, so I've manually fixed the article page and sighted it.

(Sorry I got a bit snippy in my first edit summary on the article; we get in the habit of forcefully nipping in the bud any non-reviewer's attempt to self-publish.) --Pi zero (talk) 16:05, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

 * It's possible I've screwed up, here. Some edits made after the review may have been included in the manual publication.  --Pi zero (talk) 17:30, 10 December 2010 (UTC)


text: User talk:Zlatebate

title: User talk:Zlatebate


text: User talk:P1009

title: User talk:P1009


text: User talk:Ncsabarigiri

title: User talk:Ncsabarigiri


text: User talk:Joeri Calis

title: User talk:Joeri Calis


text: User talk:Arran56

title: User talk:Arran56


text: User talk:Shiboreas

title: User talk:Shiboreas


text: User talk:SDMT105

title: User talk:SDMT105


text: User talk:Caungoc993

title: User talk:Caungoc993


text: User talk:Bdschauhan

title: User talk:Bdschauhan


text: User talk:Magunskelly

title: User talk:Magunskelly


text: User talk:Itsbydesign

title: User talk:Itsbydesign


text: User talk:Farhan Athar

title: User talk:Farhan Athar


text: User talk:NEROGIL1

title: User talk:NEROGIL1


text: User talk:Zeromind

title: User talk:Zeromind


text: User talk:Niwawachu

title: User talk:Niwawachu


text: User talk:EricaGlamour

title: User talk:EricaGlamour


text: User talk:Sadwik

title: User talk:Sadwik


text: User talk:Abhixclusive

title: User talk:Abhixclusive


text: User talk:Yathindrawiki

title: User talk:Yathindrawiki


text: User talk:NG PAK LEONG

title: User talk:NG PAK LEONG


text: User talk:Valjean1969

title: User talk:Valjean1969


text: User talk:Muck48

title: User talk:Muck48


text: User talk:Andreditor

title: User talk:Andreditor


text: User talk:Upendra45

title: User talk:Upendra45


text:
Thread:Comments:'Critical safety issue' with A380 engines/Qatar Airways looks stupid now

A couple weeks ago, Qatar Airways blasted Boeing for having issues during development of the 787, and threatened to move all their orders to Airbus.

I bet they feel cheesy now.


text: User talk:Zezxim

title: User talk:Zezxim


text: User talk:Crvineeth99

title: User talk:Crvineeth99


text:
Thread:Comments:Interpol orders arrest of Wikileaks founder to face rape charges/wiki leaks founder/reply (10)

Even if the government is that of Barack Hussein Obama?


text:
Thread:Comments:Interpol orders arrest of Wikileaks founder to face rape charges/wiki leaks founder/reply (11)

They certainly look similar, with Jimmy Wales' face all over Wikimedia and Julian Assange's face all over WikiLeaks. They look like personality cults.


text:
Thread:Comments:Interpol orders arrest of Wikileaks founder to face rape charges/Comments from feedback form - "I wish there were more informa..."/reply (2)

Actually Sweden is the one charging Assange with rape.


text: User talk:Ripon513

title: User talk:Ripon513


text: User talk:Flemart

title: User talk:Flemart


text: User talk:-Reikäpallo-

title: User talk:-Reikäpallo-


text: User talk:Taekto

title: User talk:Taekto


text: User talk:Kiend1hn

title: User talk:Kiend1hn


text: User talk:Sjolo

title: User talk:Sjolo


text: User talk:Hh1987

title: User talk:Hh1987


text: User talk:Cuijunying

title: User talk:Cuijunying


text: User talk:Wysinwygaa

title: User talk:Wysinwygaa


text:
Contestant seriously injured during live German game show

December 7, 2010

A man was seriously injured yesterday after a stunt went wrong during a live game show in Germany. Samuel Koch, 23, suffered injuries to his neck and back after he failed to jump over a car being driven by his father on the show (Wanna bet?). The show was halted after the accident for the first time in the show's history.

A spokesperson at Dusseldorf University Hospital commented on Koch's condition. He said Koch was "in an extremely critical stage" and warned that he was showing "signs of paralysis".

Koch was attempting to jump over five moving cars using spring-powered stilts known as "". He jumped over the first three but hit the fourth vehicle and crashed to the floor.

Several celebrities were due to perform on the show after the stunt had taken place. Canadian singer Justin Bieber was one of those due to appear. He cancelled his appearance after the accident and released a statement through his Twitter page. The singer said "some things are more important than putting on a show." He also sent his wishes to Koch saying, "Please pray for Samuel Koch and his family as we wait and hope for his health and safety."

Wetten, dass..? has been running for 29 years and is shown several times each year. The show features members of the public performing stunts on which the celebrity guests predict the outcome. The show has been known as a family friendly show, however, a German newspaper has questioned whether the show is suitable for children after the accident.

said, "Since Saturday evening, finally, parents have to think seriously about whether Wetten Dass…? represents an appropriate format for children. It was not really foreseeable that many children would be watching as a contestant sustained life-threatening injuries but there has always been an element of risk surrounding the program."

The producers of the show have announced that the programme will continue to broadcast despite the accident. Thomas Bellut, the programme director of the television station, made the announcement. Bellut told a public radio station, "'Wetten, dass' will certainly continue." He did defend the show's safety standards saying, "We will boost our safety standards once again although we were always of the opinion that they could hardly be more stringent."


text: User talk:BrendaLee19591

title: User talk:BrendaLee19591


text: User talk:XhepeAcidRock

title: User talk:XhepeAcidRock


text: User talk:Ann79525

title: User talk:Ann79525


text: User talk:Truongbaohan

title: User talk:Truongbaohan


text: User talk:Paul D. Cookson

title: User talk:Paul D. Cookson


text: User talk:Vimiti5656

title: User talk:Vimiti5656


text: User talk:David1111121

title: User talk:David1111121


text: User talk:عبدالرحمن راضي عمران السحيمي

title: User talk:عبدالرحمن راضي عمران السحيمي


text: User talk:M-zar

title: User talk:M-zar


text: User talk:Danoishan

title: User talk:Danoishan


text: User talk:Irinababkina

title: User talk:Irinababkina


text: User talk:XxPametnicaxx

title: User talk:XxPametnicaxx


text: User talk:Vinuviswas

title: User talk:Vinuviswas


text: User talk:744872veervats

title: User talk:744872veervats


text: User talk:Bikkhaui

title: User talk:Bikkhaui


text: User talk:Rohmahh

title: User talk:Rohmahh


text: User talk:Aman kuar verma

title: User talk:Aman kuar verma


text: User talk:Undang abdurrahman

title: User talk:Undang abdurrahman


text: User talk:Deepak panakanti

title: User talk:Deepak panakanti


text: User talk:Dgresty1990

title: User talk:Dgresty1990


text: User talk:Jharahul

title: User talk:Jharahul


text: User talk:Adeelkhayyam

title: User talk:Adeelkhayyam


text: User talk:Joanendesilva

title: User talk:Joanendesilva