text:
France, Italy, UK sending military advisers to Libya; photojournalists killed in Misrata

April 21, 2011

France and Italy have announced along with the United Kingdom that they will be sending military advisers to help Libyan rebels in their fight against the forces of Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi.

Italian Minister for Defence said Wednesday that his country will send ten instructors. French officials said they would send fewer than ten. The British Foreign Secretary, William Hague, said they would send a team that could possibly contain up to twenty advisers.

La Russa said in a news conference that the advisers' roles had yet to be determined, "They won't be on the battlefield. They'll be mentors, they won't accompany them. Training is one thing, participation another."

He further said of the rebels, "They're rich in enthusiasm, they want to fight for liberty, but naturally they are poor in experience and arms." However, La Russa believes that not all the arms the rebels have were taken from the stockpiles, stating, "I don't think they only have arms from the Gaddafi army. Some help arrived." He did not elaborate on the final statement.

Meanwhile, U.S. officials say President Barack Obama's administration plans to give the Libyan opposition 25 million in non-lethal assistance. The officials say the assistance could include items such as vehicles, fuel trucks, protective vests and non-secure radios.

Libya's foreign minister,, criticized the dispatch of foreign military advisers, saying it will harm chances for peace in the country. In an interview with the BBC, Obeidi called for a ceasefire followed by a six month period to prepare for an election. "We think any military presence is a step backwards, and we are sure that if this bombing stopped and there is a real ceasefire we could have a dialogue among all Libyans about what they want — democracy, political reform, constitution, election. This could not be done with what is going on now," said Obeidi.

The move comes as UN officials condemn the use of that are in use by pro-Gaddaffi forces, a tactic banned under the, of which Libya is not a signatory.

stated, amidst reports of snipers attacking civilians in many towns, that use of such munitions would "inevitably lead to civilian casualties", whilst also calling for NATO forces to "exercise the utmost caution and vigilance so as not to kill civilians by mistake". Pillay praised the Libyan government for allowing on Monday a U.N. humanitarian base in the capital city of Tripoli.

Meanwhile, fighting has continued between rebel and pro-government forces this Wednesday in the besieged western port city of, where residents are pleading for international intervention.

British photojournalist, who co-directed the documentary film , which was nominated for an this year, died from wounds he suffered in an  attack in the city.

His colleagues, photographers and Guy Martin were also severely wounded. Hondros suffered a severe brain injury leaving him in a critical condition and eventually succumbed to his injury at a triage center and Martin, a British citizen, was injured by shrapnel, and is now receiving vascular surgery. Another with the group, Michael Christopher Brown also received shrapnel wounds which were not life-threatening.

Hetherington last updated his Twitter account on Tuesday, which read, "In besieged Libyan city of Misrata. Indiscriminate shelling by Qaddafi forces. No sign of NATO."

Leaders in the rebel-held city called for the urgent intervention of foreign ground troops to protect the  500,000 civilians there, the first  such request by anyone among Libya's  opposition forces. The rebels' civilian leadership, the Transitional National Council, has however rejected the presence of foreign troops on Libyan soil to help their cause.

Meanwhile, across the country, NATO airstrikes again struck government installations in several cities.


text:
User talk:Rapa Nui

-- 21:48, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: User talk:Rapa Nui


text:
Thread:Comments:Honey bee decline spreading globally/No one knows/reply

Maybe more context is what is needed, than just an article "sound bite" ... likely more than just nonsense ... 97.87.29.188 (talk) 22:15, 20 April 2011 (UTC)


text:
User talk:JimmyTest

-- 22:20, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:JimmyTest


text:
Thread:Comments:Standard & Poor's lowers the U.S. credit outlook to 'negative'/And people want to keep cutting taxes?/reply (5)

As with everyone else posting so far, I wanna say you've pretty much got the right of it. I want to add that military spending takes a disproportionate amount of our budget and if any of the people in power REALLY wanted to make a dent in our budget deficit, they could likely do so by taking a fine-tooth comb over all our military expenditures and, just by reducing waste, probably come up with quite a bit of money.

It is just evil that the country is in the state it is in, that this state of affairs originated a long time ago and will likely keep getting worse and worse until our kids or grandkids get screwed by it.


text:
Thread:Comments:Standard & Poor's lowers the U.S. credit outlook to 'negative'/And people want to keep cutting taxes?/reply (6)

I like taxes. With them I buy civilization.

That means roads, healthcare, libraries, education, and a whole host of other things.

I think the most idiotic report I've seen recently was one with redtop-style headlines that 90% of people 'blow most of their monthly income in the first week of getting it". Duh. That's when your rent, utility bills, and every other expense, goes out your bank account. What would be more interesting than chastising the entire western world for mismanaging their money to sell some financial service, would be calculating what percentage of income was genuinely discretionary spending.

The money trick is a thing of wonder - until it is your pension fund invested in an Enron and a stroke of a pen destroys the imaginary money you're supposed to live on in retirement.


text:
User talk:Halibutt

-- 22:45, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Halibutt


text:
Talk:France, Italy, UK sending military advisers to Libya; photojournalists killed in Misrata

108 Signatories to Convention on Cluster Munitions
I added the following source to support the statement that Libya is not a signatory to the convention. http://www.stopclustermunitions.org/the-solution/the-treaty/?id=84 Tadpole256 (talk) 23:05, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

EtherPad
This article was collaboratively edited using an EtherPad install, with the assistance of BarkingFish, Microchip08, Tadpole256 and TUFKAAP. — μchip08 00:10, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Said EtherPad can be found here. Some edits were also made on the WMF Etherpad install but we're switched to former due to usability issues. --Patrick M (TUFKAAP) (talk) 00:52, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Template invocations must be closed...
The invocation of Source-pr is unclosed. It should be terminated correctly before the next source is given. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:20, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
 * ✅ •–• 16:46, 9 September 2020 (UTC)


text:
User talk:Prpinegar

-- 23:29, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Prpinegar


text: Template:Etherpad

title: Template:Etherpad


text:
Template:Etherpad/doc

This template serves as a friendly notification to fellow Wikinewsies that the article they are viewing is being edited off-wiki, and explains how they can get involved.

Usage

Place at the top of the article in question.

title: Template:Etherpad/doc


text:
User talk:Scarpacia

-- 00:10, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Scarpacia


text:
User talk:BoboRoshi62

-- 00:25, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:BoboRoshi62


text:
User talk:Jian57

-- 00:27, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jian57


text:
User talk:Vandypsych

-- 00:49, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Vandypsych


text:
User talk:Macbeth1983

-- 00:57, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Macbeth1983


text:
User talk:Seanjohn6

-- 01:21, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Seanjohn6


text:
User talk:Jjrapper100

-- 01:29, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jjrapper100


text:
User talk:Doyle87

-- 02:09, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Doyle87


text:
Riot at Sydney, Australia's Villawood Detention Centre continues

April 21, 2011

A riot at Sydney's Villawood Detention Centre continued Thursday with six protesters remaining on the roof after the centre was set alight Wednesday night in a protest involving up to 100 detainees. Nobody has been injured in the protest.

Nine demountable buildings were destroyed in the blaze, described as an "act of desperation" from asylum-seekers held at the centre for up to two years. Firefighters were pelted with roof tiles and other debris as they struggled to contain the fire.

The protest began early Wednesday, sparked by two men climbing onto the roof of the building. The remaining detainees are sitting on the roof with a large sign that reads "We need help." According to one protestor, further violence is unlikely to occur, but they will continue to stay on the roof.

Riot police were seen entering the building at approximately 9.30 a.m..

Villawood has been the site of much recent controversy, with a similar protest taking place in September last year following the death of a Fijian detainee, and a second death in November that led to a hunger strike at the centre.


text:
User talk:Sylvainvachon

-- 02:41, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sylvainvachon


text:
User talk:Kbo206

-- 02:46, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kbo206


text:
User talk:Illneedasaviour

-- 02:53, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Illneedasaviour


text:
User talk:Adonis Laerte Mezzano

-- 02:55, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Adonis Laerte Mezzano


text:
User talk:Inayathulla Khan Lohani

-- 03:02, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Inayathulla Khan Lohani


text:
Thread:Comments:Situation at damaged nuclear power plant remains 'very grave', says Japanese Prime Minister/boom/reply (2)

it is now classified as level 7


text:
User talk:Daimond

-- 03:09, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Daimond


text:
User talk:Luckyaim

-- 03:21, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Luckyaim


text:
User talk:DANKYfresh

-- 03:34, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:DANKYfresh


text:
User talk:Wikisaikat

-- 03:38, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Wikisaikat


text:
User:Art-Vandelay

Journalism student at University of Wollongong

title: User:Art-Vandelay


text:
User talk:Filly02

-- 03:44, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Filly02


text:
User:Mysterion~enwikinews

Mysterion

Australian Journalism student specializing in Australian political reporting.

title: User:Mysterion~enwikinews


text:
User talk:Borkzorkorc

-- 04:02, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Journalism students!?!?!
Hi!

I notice quite a few of you registering accounts all at the same time. Good luck with Wikinews! Has one of your lecturers suggested use of this site for any particular reason? If so, you might want to suggest they get in touch with myself, or some of the other administrators on the project.

--Brian McNeil / talk 13:54, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Category:UoW 2011 student work
I have created this category so you can all track each others' work on-wiki. Please add it to all articles you create; if any articles you have already created are now protected, and require this added, please put an editprotected request on the talk page of the relevant article. --Brian McNeil / talk 18:41, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Additionally, UoW 2011 student contributions is where I've asked the rest of Wikinews to track all UoW contribtions; please refer to the diff links provided there to see what work other editors see as required prior to publication, or to see where articles have failed or had other issues highlighted. --Brian McNeil / talk 14:23, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Borkzorkorc


text:
User:Borkzorkorc

Borkzorkorc Lives Here

Hi.

Borkzorkorc (talk) 04:05, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User:Borkzorkorc


text:
User:Cropje

Australian communications and journalism student. Contact on cropje@live.com.au.

title: User:Cropje


text:
User:Linda90

Student at the University of Wollongong studying Law and Journalism

title: User:Linda90


text:
User:Eed123

Journalism Student

title: User:Eed123


text:
User:Tah727

A journalism student at the University of Wollongong, NSW, Australia. Most of my postings on this site are articles for class assignments.

Find me on Twitter or Tumblr.

title: User:Tah727


text:
User talk:Rabama

-- 04:25, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rabama


text:
User talk:Owenjsutton

-- 04:46, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Owenjsutton


text:
Netanyahu pushed previous prime minister Olmert to attack Iran, according to Wikileaks cables

April 22, 2011

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu actively pushed for a military strike on Iran, according to a report published in the Israeli newspaper on Thursday.

A document revealed by Wikileaks, dated July 20, 2007, shows that Mr. Netanyahu, leader of the Likud party, urged an attack on Iran in exchange for joining the government at the time, led by Ehud Olmert.

Mr. Netanyahu's request was made as part of discussions to form a government of national unity between Likud and Mr. Olmert's Kadima party, according to the leaked cable, classified as "confidential" and penned by Marc. J. Sievers, who was at the US embassy in Tel Aviv as a political counselor.

An advisor to Mr. Netanyahu told American officials at the time that the Likud leader was willing to take the post of foreign minister, while Mr. Olmert would have become prime minister.

However, Mr. Netanyahu demanded military action against Iran as the price for his participation in the proposed coalition. According to the advisor cited in the US cable, Mr. Netanyahu urged the Kadima leader to "galvanize Israel for action against Iran."

Israel has previously entertained the possibility of military strikes to prevent Iran from attaining nuclear weapons capability. In November 2010, Iran announced uranium enrichment activities had been disrupted by the computer virus. The Iranian government later accused the US and Israel of responsibility for the malware.

Israel and Western powers have accused Iran, whose president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, has called for Israel to be "wiped off the map," of seeking to obtain nuclear weapons under the guise of a civilian nuclear program.


text:
User talk:Cainanyang

-- 05:38, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Cainanyang


text:
User talk:Chrizburn

-- 05:44, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Chrizburn


text:
User talk:KyuuA4

-- 05:53, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:KyuuA4


text:
User talk:Kokyawookyaw

-- 05:55, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kokyawookyaw


text:
User talk:Miklekuppusamy

-- 05:56, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Miklekuppusamy


text:
User talk:Jdnin

-- 06:06, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jdnin


text:
User talk:VV OLIVÉR

-- 06:11, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:VV OLIVÉR


text:
User talk:Psicologiaposmoderna

-- 06:13, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Psicologiaposmoderna


text:
User talk:Crescentedu

-- 06:27, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Crescentedu


text:
User talk:Whalexyoke

-- 06:27, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Whalexyoke


text:
User talk:Feniksi12

-- 06:28, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Feniksi12


text:
User talk:Smritiseo

-- 06:36, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Smritiseo


text:
Thread:Comments:Standard & Poor's lowers the U.S. credit outlook to 'negative'/And people want to keep cutting taxes?/reply (7)

"screw over public schooling"

lol, you can't break something that's already broken...


text:
User talk:MonotonousDecade

-- 06:58, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:MonotonousDecade


text:
User talk:Marcel083

-- 07:02, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Marcel083


text:
User talk:Writerose

-- 07:12, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Writerose


text:
User talk:Chandanmeetro

-- 07:15, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Chandanmeetro


text:
User talk:Jmagyar1993

-- 07:28, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jmagyar1993


text:
User talk:Adityahbk

-- 07:31, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Adityahbk


text:
User talk:Arkivarius

-- 07:58, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Arkivarius


text:
User talk:Abypedia

-- 07:59, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Abypedia


text:
Thread:Comments:Former adult film actress forced to leave teaching job again/Comments from feedback form - "Her past is her past. I would ..."/reply (7)

her job in adult entertainment industry is as honorable and   as other kinds of job like police teacher soldier goverment offficer ,so how could american suspend her teaching ,that decision is shameful for a  democratic country like usa. so we should organize a campaign to support her returning to teaching post. god bless her. fuck those hypocrisy people who judge her by bias.


text:
User talk:124.128.251.108

her job in adult entertainment industry is as honorable and   as other kinds of job like police teacher soldier goverment offficer ,so how could american suspend her teaching ,that decision is shameful for a  democratic country like usa. so we should organize a campaign to support her returning to teaching post. god bless her. fuck those hypocrisy people who judge her by bias.

title: User talk:124.128.251.108


text:
User talk:Serepsa

-- 08:35, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Serepsa


text:
User talk:ALONEBABY78

-- 08:53, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:ALONEBABY78


text:
User talk:Kanzaki Jiro

-- 08:56, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kanzaki Jiro


text:
User talk:Rinndash

-- 08:56, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rinndash


text:
User talk:Ikarazmadze

-- 08:56, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ikarazmadze


text:
User talk:AlexanderFrancis

-- 09:10, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:AlexanderFrancis


text:
User talk:Skyfore89

-- 09:16, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Skyfore89


text:
User talk:Emabartolomucci

-- 09:26, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Emabartolomucci


text:
User talk:Pietro Effe

-- 09:27, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Pietro Effe


text:
User talk:Posalaki36

-- 09:34, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Posalaki36


text:
User talk:Flecha md

-- 09:39, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Flecha md


text:
User talk:Akkah

-- 09:52, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Akkah


text:
User talk:Arcadianlyric

-- 09:52, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Arcadianlyric


text:
User talk:Nafnosseb

-- 10:06, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nafnosseb


text:
User talk:Bogadin

-- 10:26, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bogadin


text:
User talk:Javierstr

-- 10:27, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Javierstr


text:
User talk:SergMol

-- 10:42, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:SergMol


text: User:Dendodge/Main Page/Lead 2.1

title: User:Dendodge/Main Page/Lead 2.1


text:
User talk:EKhan

-- 11:16, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:EKhan


text:
User talk:CZARness

-- 11:23, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:CZARness


text:
User talk:Mdmf

-- 11:24, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mdmf


text:
User talk:Laibhbwl992

-- 11:28, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Laibhbwl992


text:
User talk:Baracuda728

-- 11:33, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Baracuda728


text:
User talk:DCRobi

-- 11:33, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:DCRobi


text:
User talk:Who Am I Why Am I Here

-- 11:35, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Who Am I Why Am I Here


text:
User talk:Dexxenj

-- 11:37, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dexxenj


text:
User talk:JV056Padhang

-- 11:42, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:JV056Padhang


text:
User talk:LexArt

-- 12:09, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:LexArt


text:
User talk:Ristepan

-- 12:27, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ristepan


text:
User talk:Yogitha6

-- 12:56, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Yogitha6


text:
User talk:Joyson Noel

-- 13:19, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Joyson Noel


text:
User talk:Осин

-- 13:24, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Осин


text:
User talk:Ciklisti

-- 13:25, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ciklisti


text:
User talk:Richa~enwikinews

-- 13:27, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Richa. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Richa~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:21, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:36, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Richa~enwikinews


text:
User talk:Jinga~enwikinews

-- 13:44, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Jinga. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Jinga~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:19, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:32, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jinga~enwikinews


text:
User talk:Fatcatpaperie

-- 14:02, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Fatcatpaperie


text:
User talk:Mabros

-- 14:14, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mabros


text:
User talk:Stevenshapiro

-- 14:28, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Stevenshapiro


text:
User talk:Mohanavel

-- 14:33, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mohanavel


text:
User talk:Grandmastermarkie

-- 14:35, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Grandmastermarkie


text:
Sheffield United relegated from English Football League Championship

May 1, 2011

have been relegated from the English, after a 2-2 home draw to Yorkshire rivals at  on Saturday, their 45th game of the season. Though United's fate had been all but sealed in recent weeks, they could mathematically taken the relegation battle to the final day if the match had been won - and the results of rivals and Crystal Palace had gone their way.

Despite pre-season hopes of a place, 'The Blades' have been stuck in a fight for Championship survival for the majority of the season, which has been the result of three managerial changes in the period of just 8 months. Currently lead by former boss (and a childhood United fan),, results have continued to be generally poor in 2011 - despite the departure of   (who took over from  in August 2010, but left after just 4 months to coach ).

The South Yorkshire football club controversially began a legal dispute with London-based in 2007 following 's (FA) decision not to deduct Sheffield's relegation rivals  points for ineligibly fielding  (which subsequently  lead to Sheffield United's relegation from the top flight of English football). Since then, numerous attempts to return to the have been unsuccessful, including a play-off final hosted at  in 2009.

Speaking after today's game, a downhearted Micky Adams remarked: "I'm obviously devastated. There's a lot of disappointed players in the changing rooms today and I think they have every right to be disappointed. The team's a genuine hard-working group but they've just not been good enough. We have to share responsibility and I'll take mine".

Adams admitted he "can't say" whether he will still be in charge next season, though was adamant that he "wants to be the manager who brings them [United] back".

United will play in the for the 2011/12 football season. As this was not Sheffield's last game of the campaign, the club could still move down to 23rd place, but cannot achieve a place outside the relegation zone.

Perhaps ironically, this event comes almost a year after cross-city rivals were relegated from the same division, meaning that next season will host the first Steel City Derby in the third tier of English football since 1980.


text:
User talk:Belfador

-- 14:49, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Belfador


text:
User talk:Kondi-kalle

-- 14:51, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kondi-kalle


text:
User talk:Vovagubin

-- 15:20, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Vovagubin


text:
User talk:Jerry73204

-- 15:24, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jerry73204


text:
User talk:Jkb24

-- 15:36, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jkb24


text:
User talk:Kadia1962

-- 15:54, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kadia1962


text:
User talk:Yuyu.lewis04

-- 15:56, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Yuyu.lewis04


text:
User talk:Karways

-- 15:56, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Karways


text:
User talk:Shivam bros

-- 16:00, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Shivam bros


text:
User talk:Kumarparas

-- 16:03, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kumarparas


text:
User talk:Jerusha11

-- 16:05, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jerusha11


text:
User talk:Shadowmattster

-- 16:13, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Shadowmattster


text:
User talk:BLaccci

-- 16:15, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:BLaccci


text:
User talk:Aussieladlav 4

— μchip08 17:18, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Aussieladlav 4


text:
User talk:Wigbold

-- 16:18, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Wigbold


text:
User talk:Poeta Eduardo Flores

-- 16:47, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Poeta Eduardo Flores


text:
User talk:Granitecitytool

-- 16:48, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Granitecitytool


text:
User talk:Trevorcunning

-- 17:01, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Trevorcunning


text:
User talk:Aliseibert

-- 17:05, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Aliseibert


text:
User talk:Ionutmortu

-- 17:07, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ionutmortu


text:
User talk:Paglakahinka

-- 17:10, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Paglakahinka


text:
User talk:Jetfan828588

-- 17:15, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jetfan828588


text:
Template:Unblock/preload

Unblock request
{{tl| {{ unblock|Please type your reason here.}}

title: Template:Unblock/preload


text:
User talk:MarchingOrders

-- 17:28, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:MarchingOrders


text:
Thread:Comments:Experts raise serious questions over safety of U.S. oil industry and warn another spill may be 'unavoidable'/Isn't It Obvious./reply (2)

I'm assuming the poster is referring to the fact that nuclear power, as an potentially extremely dangerous power source, cannot be utilized safely without numerous safety measures. Numerous, costly, safety measures. That's just not profitable when hundreds of thousands of dollars are being spent to keep a plant from going meltdown. Skim here, cut a corner here, and it becomes profitable, and a recipe for disaster. This is also exactly the problem with oil. It's just not a good return on investment when that investment is being "eaten up" by keeping the environment and human resources safe and healthy. Oil is even worse however, in that it isn't as renewable as nuclear power.

I advocate nuclear power in that it is a decent alternative to oil. It's not particularly safe, but "power" holds no connotations of easily controlled substances (even solar, hydroelectric, and wind, which just aren't reliable enough to profitable yet, though all are safer than nuclear). If we had a little foresight we would be able to utilize nuclear power safely and effectively, and it can be done. I've never heard of a meltdown in France, which gets 75% of its electricity from nuclear power (www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf40.html).


text:
User talk:Mariortz

-- 17:51, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mariortz


text:
User talk:Franklyndiego22

-- 18:00, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Franklyndiego22


text:
User talk:Taylorclevenger

-- 18:08, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Taylorclevenger


text:
Template:Unblock/editintro

=File unblock request=
 * You are currently filing an unblock request. Please fill out the box below, entering a valid reason for being unblocked in the correct space.
 * Bear in mind the following things when filing an unblock request:
 * Be civil.
 * Read the blocking policy to understand why you were blocked.
 * If you do not wish to file an unblock request on-wiki, or are unable to do so, you may be able to e-mail the blocking administrator, or alternatively send an e-mail to wikinews-l@wikimedia.org.

title: Template:Unblock/editintro


text:
User talk:Osaga1966

-- 18:10, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Osaga1966


text:
User talk:Königstein88

-- 18:18, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Königstein88


text:
User talk:TomGF38Italia

-- 18:18, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:TomGF38Italia


text:
User talk:Haneesrivastava

-- 18:22, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Haneesrivastava


text: Category:2011 Yemen anti-government protests


text:
User talk:Sid wylde

-- 18:27, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sid wylde


text:
User talk:Fildakillda

-- 18:31, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Fildakillda


text:
Comments:US Senate blocks Alaska refuge drilling

Comments from feedback form - "we need up to date information..."
we need up to date information on drilling in anwr. —67.238.0.9 (talk) 18:49, 21 April 2011 (UTC)


text:
User talk:Jasonw56k

-- 18:54, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jasonw56k


text:
User talk:Neosysworld

-- 19:00, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Neosysworld


text:
User talk:Mohsenkalaantari

-- 19:18, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mohsenkalaantari


text:
All US states could have smoke-free laws by 2020

April 22, 2011 Government officials have predicted that by 2020, all US states will have bans on indoor smoking in private sector bars and restaurants, the chief sources of, if the current rate of progress in enacting smoking bans continues.

In a press release issued yesterday, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported that by December 31, 2010 there were 26 states with broad indoor smoking bans, covering workplaces, bars and restaurants, while an additional 10 states had banned smoking in one or two specific indoor areas. Cumulatively, these restriction cover almost one half of the country's population, 47.8 percent, while a remaining 88 million nonsmokers  are still exposed to secondhand smoke yearly, including half of all children over three years old.

In comparison, in 2000 there were no states that had broad indoor smoking bans.

Some states have enacted less restrictive laws, such as requiring separate ventilation systems for smoking areas. Southern and western states are lagging in implementing smoking bans. Florida, Louisiana, and North Carolina have banned smoking in two of the three sectors. Currently there are only seven states having no state wide restrictions on  indoor smoking, although some have local ordinances. These are Indiana, Kentucky, Mississippi, South Carolina, Texas, West Virginia, and Wyoming, according to the CDC.

The full report was published in this week's .

Secondhand smoke is a known cause of a number of diseases including lung cancer and heart disease. The report of 2010 says, "tobacco smoke damages every organ in the body, resulting in disease and death."

In the press release, Ursula Bauer of the CDC, said that secondhand smoke is the cause of 46,000 heart disease deaths and 3,400 lung cancer deaths yearly in  nonsmokers. "Completely prohibiting smoking in all public places and workplaces is the only way to fully protect nonsmokers from secondhand smoke exposure," she said.

Dr., director of the CDC said, "Eliminating smoking from work sites, restaurants and bars is a low-cost, high-impact strategy that will protect nonsmokers and allow them to live healthier, longer, more productive lives while lowering health care costs associated with secondhand smoke."

The issued a statement: "We must zero in on those areas that continue to lag despite studies that show smoke-free policies benefit  and the local economy with lower health care costs."

Gary Nolan of the Smokers Club, a smoker's rights group, said, "It wouldn't surprise me if they prevailed." He noted that heavy pressure is being applied to bars and restaurants by public health officials to ban smoking. "It's just a little bit more liberty slipping away at the hands of big government."


text:
User talk:Sreejiththulasee

-- 19:34, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sreejiththulasee


text:
User talk:Mehdy59

-- 19:39, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mehdy59


text:
User talk:Cbkrcn007

-- 19:41, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Cbkrcn007


text:
User talk:Ivoland7

-- 19:53, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ivoland7


text:
User talk:199.245.156.254

This is your last/only warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikinews. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do, since testing elsewhere will be reverted quickly. アンパロ Io ti odio! 20:00, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:199.245.156.254


text:
User talk:Mat314

-- 20:03, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mat314


text:
User talk:Roughbeak

-- 20:05, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Roughbeak


text:
User talk:Ana bonita

-- 20:08, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ana bonita


text:
User talk:65.5.76.250

"i bet your speedy deletion request came from china"
No. In fact, it came from Australia. アンパロ Io ti odio! 20:25, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:65.5.76.250


text:
User talk:Cckr

-- 20:52, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Cckr


text:
User talk:Practicamyspace

-- 20:56, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Practicamyspace


text:
User talk:Tqycolumbia

-- 21:31, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tqycolumbia


text:
Amazon server outage affects Reddit, other websites

April 22, 2011

Amazon.com's (EC2) experienced outages Thursday, taking down major websites, including Reddit,, , and. The company reported on its "Service Health Dashboard" that it first noticed "instance connectivity, latency and error rates" at 1:41 a.m.  (08:41 ) Thursday morning.

The outage, which occurred at Amazon's northern Virginia, affected some of the company's US EC2 clients for much of the day. EC2, which hosts thousands of websites, is an  platform.

Quora, an online, was taken offline by the outage. Reddit, a site, was accessible by mid-Thursday, but was still running at limited functionality. Location-based social network Foursquare experienced disruptions in service early Thursday, but appeared to have resumed normal operation by the afternoon. Other sites, such as Hootsuite and, displayed error messages instead of their normal home pages.

Amazon has experienced outages before, including one in 2008 that lasted two hours due to technical problems at a data center. The company did not comment on the cause or scope of Thursday's outage, but continued to post public updates on its health dashboard. By Thursday evening, Amazon said it had resolved most of the issues affecting EC2, but one service availability zone had still not recovered.


text:
Talk:Security forces open fire on anti-government protestors in Syria

Categories
edit protected Please move this article from Category:Syria to Category:Syrian Civil War. Thank you. Green Giant (talk) 17:31, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Added to the latter. --Pi zero (talk) 01:12, 2 October 2015 (UTC)


text: Comments:Security forces open fire on anti-government protestors in Syria


text: Comments:France, Italy, UK sending military advisers to Libya; photojournalists killed in Misrata


text: Talk:Riot at Sydney, Australia's Villawood Detention Centre continues


text: Comments:Riot at Sydney, Australia's Villawood Detention Centre continues


text:
User talk:P16067

-- 22:08, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:P16067


text:
User talk:SF 123

-- 22:13, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:SF 123


text:
User talk:Melfeller

-- 23:02, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Melfeller


text:
User talk:Name-08

-- 23:03, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Name-08


text:
User talk:Snoozer22229

-- 23:07, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Snoozer22229


text:
User talk:Ushak d

-- 23:10, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ushak d


text:
User talk:Orlandodreaming

-- 23:15, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Orlandodreaming


text:
Thread:Comments:'Worst song of all time' becomes YouTube sensation/Friday...UGH!

This song is HORRIBLE!!!! She says Friday weird I swear to mu'fukin god, this chick needs to fuckin die, cain't sang!!!! :/ I wanna meet her and slap the shit out of her!!!


text:
Thread:Comments:'Worst song of all time' becomes YouTube sensation/ it's funny/reply

Uhh, Greyson Chance is 13 and he has a good voice(:


text:
User talk:Chase103

-- 23:27, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Chase103


text:
User talk:Carlos ravel

-- 00:00, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Carlos ravel


text:
User talk:Kavi Badal

-- 00:43, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kavi Badal


text:
User talk:Taherab

-- 01:13, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Taherab


text:
User talk:T3hbrian

-- 01:15, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:T3hbrian


text:
User talk:Hqmedia

-- 01:17, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hqmedia


text:
User talk:Seb26

-- 01:22, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Seb26


text:
User talk:Chrishibbard7

-- 01:28, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Chrishibbard7


text:
User talk:Dom497

-- 01:41, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

48-year-old killed skiing at Blue Mountain
Hi. Unfortunately, this article is not-ready for publication. Please see the review comments, and. --Pi zero (talk) 02:33, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dom497


text:
User talk:Ajun685

-- 02:12, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Hi
I worked on your article a little bit Yao JiaXin, murderer of road traffic incident casualty, sentenced. Hope that's ok. It is a very interesting article. I hope you write more articles, especially on China. Best wishes, Mattisse (talk) 01:36, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Your article was published and is on the main page.  Congratulations! Mattisse (talk) 03:11, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ajun685


text:
User talk:Dreycus

-- 02:15, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dreycus


text:
User:Ajun685

I'm a Chinese, from Anhui province, China, where the well-known Yellow Mountain is located. Wish to communicate with the world!

title: User:Ajun685


text:
User talk:Yussuf cool

-- 02:37, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Yussuf cool


text:
Talk:Amazon server outage affects Reddit, other websites

Review of revision 1218519 [Passed]
editprotected "Amazon has experienced outages before, including one in 2008 that lasted two-hour due to technical problems"

Should read 'two hours' Lx45803 (talk) 09:42, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ アンパロ Io ti odio! 17:07, 9 October 2011 (UTC)


text: Comments:Amazon server outage affects Reddit, other websites


text:
User talk:Anuttaro

-- 03:22, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Anuttaro


text:
Thread:Comments:France, Italy, UK sending military advisers to Libya; photojournalists killed in Misrata/Comments from feedback form - "At this point I think it's nec..."

At this point I think it's necessary that NATO send in ground troops to battle against Gaddafi. Go in, get it over with, then leave!


text:
User talk:Cheuksiu

-- 03:29, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Cheuksiu


text:
Murderer of road accident victim sentenced to death

April 23, 2011

Yao Jiaxin, a 21-year-old student at the Xi'an Conservatory of Music, was sentenced to death on Friday. Yao, from in China's, was convicted of homicide after stabbing a cyclist to death.

On the night of October 20, 2010, Yao ran into 26-year-old cyclist and mother of a two-year-old, Zhang Miao, while driving his car. After he saw her writing down his vehicle's license plate number following the accident, he feared she would report him, and proceeded to murder her by stabbing her six times. Prior to her murder, Zhang had suffered only minor injuries in the accident, according to police.

On October 23, after being accused of murdering her, Yao went to the local police station with his parents and confessed to the crime. He said he killed Zhang because she had seen his license plate number, and he feared that the "peasant woman would be hard to deal with."

During a three-hour trial on March 23, 2011, Yao's lawyer pleaded for a lenient sentence, saying it was a "crime of passion." Yao tearfully described how he had been forced to play the piano, leading him to thoughts of suicide. But prosecutors and judges said Yao did not deserve leniency, as he had not attempted to help the woman after the accident but instead murdered her.

Public passions were raised and some thought Yao would get off through the influence of his family. The case triggered a public debate over the.

"The motive is extremely despicable ... the measures are extremely cruel ... and the consequence is extremely serious," said the court in its judgment.


text:
User talk:TheArguer

-- 03:32, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:TheArguer


text:
User talk:Phil wink

-- 03:43, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Phil wink


text:
User talk:Shameer john

-- 03:53, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Shameer john


text:
User talk:Saikatahammad2

-- 04:00, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Saikatahammad2


text:
User talk:Rodrigogomesonetwo

-- 04:03, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rodrigogomesonetwo


text:
User talk:Sean Dikdan

-- 04:30, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sean Dikdan


text:
User:Morgankevinj

__NOINDEX__

User Pages on other projects

 * Wikipedia-logo-v2.svgEnglish wikipedia
 * Commons-logo.svgWikimedia Commons
 * Wikimedia_Community_Logo.svgMeta-wiki
 * OTRS Wikimedia.svgOTRS wiki

title: User:Morgankevinj


text:
User talk:MrVlados

-- 04:32, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:MrVlados


text:
User talk:SimplyIrresistible

-- 04:50, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:SimplyIrresistible


text:
User:SimplyIrresistible

I am Simply / Irresistible

My other user pages:

 * meta:User:SimplyIrresistible
 * simple:User:SimplyIrresistible
 * commons:User:SimplyIrresistible

simple:User:SimplyIrresistible

title: User:SimplyIrresistible


text:
User talk:Sartajalam77

-- 04:57, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sartajalam77


text:
User talk:Rajyashree Agarwala

-- 05:07, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rajyashree Agarwala


text:
User talk:Access seoul

-- 05:07, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Access seoul


text:
Thread:Comments:Schoolboy dies in Gaza after bus hit by rockets/Tragedy/Another Reason/reply (4)

As if Israel doesn't commit terrorism already. It's dog-v-dog war.

Why is this on front page news?


text:
Thread:Comments:Standard & Poor's lowers the U.S. credit outlook to 'negative'/S&P does not have crediblity

While I agree with the point that our spending has been out of control, note that this is the same S&P that was rating subprime mortgages as AAA back in 2006. Why is S&P considered a credible source of ratings by wikinews?


text:
User talk:Moray An Par

-- 05:26, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Moray An Par


text:
User talk:Vice28

-- 05:26, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Vice28


text:
User talk:Maqivi

-- 05:44, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Maqivi


text:
User talk:Awantitraders

-- 05:50, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Awantitraders


text:
Thread:Comments:Amazon server outage affects Reddit, other websites/Comments from feedback form - "i have seriously never seen a ..."

i have seriously never seen a worse page, news or otherwise


text:
User talk:Xlx 13

-- 07:05, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Xlx 13


text:
User talk:Shubhm

-- 07:25, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Shubhm


text:
User talk:Konguboy

-- 07:35, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Konguboy


text:
User talk:Roshan6126

-- 07:59, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Roshan6126


text:
User talk:Tolibas

-- 08:01, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tolibas


text:
User talk:Anaketje

-- 08:02, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Anaketje


text:
User talk:Edi lac

-- 08:11, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Edi lac


text:
User talk:Yarnamc

-- 08:20, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Yarnamc


text:
User talk:Дудченко Роман

-- 08:20, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Дудченко Роман


text:
User talk:KevinSlade

-- 08:30, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:KevinSlade


text:
User talk:Polina Baskakova

-- 08:32, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Polina Baskakova


text:
User talk:Okada masaya

-- 08:38, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Okada masaya


text:
User talk:Ravisastrykadali

-- 09:10, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ravisastrykadali


text:
User talk:Nashikgrapes

-- 09:15, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nashikgrapes


text:
User talk:Mandlhnyc

-- 09:20, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mandlhnyc


text:
User talk:Gusmas

-- 09:24, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gusmas


text:
User talk:Zellino

-- 09:36, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Zellino


text:
User talk:Prashant430

-- 09:38, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Prashant430


text:
User talk:Android-marionette

-- 09:50, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Android-marionette


text:
User talk:Arg342

-- 09:50, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Arg342


text:
User talk:Public brdcstr

-- 09:52, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Public brdcstr


text:
User talk:Huskydreams

-- 09:56, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Huskydreams


text:
User talk:MrtechLux

-- 10:02, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:MrtechLux


text:
User talk:Sepehrius

-- 10:05, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sepehrius


text:
User talk:Wikiusername7795

-- 10:06, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Wikiusername7795


text:
User talk:KS700

-- 10:08, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:KS700


text:
User talk:Acharya shukla

-- 10:14, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Acharya shukla


text:
Talk:Netanyahu pushed previous prime minister Olmert to attack Iran, according to Wikileaks cables

Sourcing
Technically, Wikinews articles ought to have two sources about the news event itself - in this case, two sources covering the newly publicised cable. Obviously, in this case we're looking at an exclusive from one paper, but what would be really cool is if you could find the original cable online and source from it. This also allows you to quote directly from it and then cite it as an original source document - which would give us our own original report. Blood Red Sandman (Talk)   (Contribs) 10:51, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Re Sourcing
I spent a long while browsing the Wikileaks cables to try and locate the document in question. It doesn't appear to be there. I can only assume that it hasn't been released online yet (it seems that leaks tend to be channeled through mainstream media outlets before they make their way onto the Wikileaks site in original form, which is frustrating!)


text:
Thread:Comments:Schoolboy dies in Gaza after bus hit by rockets/Tragedy/Another Reason/reply (5)

Why wouldn't it be?


text:
Thread:Comments:Schoolboy dies in Gaza after bus hit by rockets/Article Title/reply

What does that conflict with in the title?


text:
User talk:Qazsed1

-- 11:13, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Qazsed1


text:
User talk:KeredRednaxela

-- 11:35, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:KeredRednaxela


text:
UK newspapers face libel, privacy action over murder coverage

April 22, 2011

Six UK newspapers are facing actions claiming libel and breach of privacy from Chris Jeffries, a man who attracted intense media coverage when arrested in December for the. Jeffries was subsequently released and a different man has been charged instead.

Lawyer Louis Charalambous says Jeffries "seek[s] vindication of his reputation for the terrible treatment he received" from six newspapers – ', ', ', ', ', and '. The papers all covered the man's arrest following the discovery of a body near the Clifton area of Bristol, England, on Christmas Day; Yeates had been missing from her flat since December 17. Jeffries was the flat's landlord.

Another man who shared the Clifton address – Vincent Tabak – was later arrested when police eliminated Jeffries from any involvement with the murder. Tabak's next court appearance is set for May 4 and the trial is scheduled to take place in October.

Media coverage of Jeffries attracted criticism at the time; Roy Greenslade wrote for  that the suspect was facing "a character assassination" and  warned papers they may be in breach of  legislation. Although no prosecutions have been launched to date, Grieve recently succeeded in an action claiming contempt of court by two of the papers targeted by Jeffries – The Sun and The Daily Mail – over their coverage of a different murder.

In addition to the six national papers that have received writs, action is anticipated against several local papers. "Mr Jefferies will not be making any statement about these claims until their conclusion, which he hopes will be in the very near future," according to his legal team at solicitors Simons Muirhead and Burton.

Charalambous has previously sued all the papers except The Daily Record - alongside ', ', ', ', ' and ' - while representing Robert Murat, over in excess of 100 "seriously defamatory" articles linking him to the. In 2008 Murat received 600,000 and an apology, as well as a separate undisclosed amount from broadcaster.


text:
Thread:Comments:Standard & Poor's lowers the U.S. credit outlook to 'negative'/S&P does not have crediblity/reply

You are right. S&P is one of the main credit rating agencies. We will see what the others do. (But they were all rating subprime mortgages as AAA back in 2006.)


text:
User talk:謝雷蒙

-- 11:45, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:謝雷蒙


text:
User talk:Wongpedro

-- 11:50, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Wongpedro


text:
User talk:Eldahan

-- 11:52, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Eldahan


text:
User talk:Kio-Kio-San

-- 11:55, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kio-Kio-San


text:
User talk:Chalcidicum

-- 12:07, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Chalcidicum


text:
Talk:UK newspapers face libel, privacy action over murder coverage

Related news
Only the more recent of the two related articles has been used to source any information - namely, the recent success against the Sun and Daily Mail in a contempt of court action. Only that little bit of the article was taken from there. Blood Red Sandman (Talk)   (Contribs) 12:12, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Headline
To me "UK murder suspect" implies that he is a current suspect. But I can't think of a safer headline that isn't clumsy and doesn't rely on prior knowledge. Anyone? Or am I just being too cautious? the wub "?!"  15:45, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I'd say it's over-cautious if your concern is us (WMF) or me getting a libel writ ourselves/myself. However, from a simple quality perspective, I can see why we'd wanna change it. How about UK newspapers face libel, privacy action over murder coverage? It loses the active voice, but it's my best idea. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 15:52, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah, "cautious" probably wasn't the right word to pick - I'm certainly not suggesting we'd get sued! The hot weather is making my brain word dumb... things.
 * Your suggestion sounds good and I've done the rename. I've never understood some people's fetishisation of active voice to be honest, passive works fine if it's well chosen. the wub "?!"  16:02, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm jealous. I'm two days back from warmer climes, and already my weather is replaced with grey grot.
 * I think I'd agree, although choosing it well is more difficult. My favoured change is immediacy - e.g. using says instead of said for very recent quotations. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 16:07, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Quoting from here:
 * 1) "Expressing the same idea in passive voice frequently takes 30% to 40% more words"
 * 2) "Passive voice requires more "weak" words. It uses abstract words like is /am /are /was /were /being /been, the demonstrative pronoun (the), and prepositions like by and of."
 * 3) "The passive voice clause can be confusing or unclear, especially in long sentences."
 * 4) "Passive voice often leads to awkward or stilted writing"
 * 5) "Linguistic studies show that native English speakers are better able to remember material they read in active voice than the same material in passive voice."
 * I practically needed passive voice beaten out of me when I started writing on Wikinews. It is ideal for writing software specifications or proposals because you don't always want the precision at a higher level and the actual detail spec is going to be near-pseudocode. --Brian McNeil / talk 17:01, 22 April 2011 (UTC)


text:
User talk:Murma174

-- 12:16, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Murma174


text:
User talk:Ashleynicole2021

-- 12:16, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ashleynicole2021


text:
User talk:Leningrad1944

-- 12:32, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Leningrad1944


text:
User talk:Drpratikwani

-- 12:36, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Drpratikwani


text:
Apple collecting location data from iPhone, iPad

April 23, 2011

Apple Inc.'s and  periodically send location information back to the company, according to new reports. The data is transmitted to a secure database that only it can access, Apple claims.

Bruce Sewell, an attorney for Apple, sent a letter to two US Representatives last year, discussing the company's data collection techniques and policies. The thirteen-page letter states that location information is recorded and sent to Apple every twelve hours, but only if the user enables the device's location settings.

Apple began building a location database of its own when it decided to stop using similar services offered by Google &. Location data is used in social networking applications and call routing.

In a statement to the Associated Press, Democratic Massachusetts Representative  said, "Apple needs to safeguard the personal location information of its users to ensure that an iPhone doesn't become an iTrack."

Such data collection is not unique to Apple. Google's operating system uses similar technology to provide location-based services to its users. Google has said that it also uses the data collected to provide accurate traffic data through its "Maps" applications on both Apple and Android devices. However, the company declined to comment on the latest findings regarding its data collection.

Apple was also recently in the spotlight after it was discovered that the iPhone and iPad were retaining location data on the device itself. This information is collected in an unencrypted file and is not transmitted elsewhere. The data file reportedly contains a variety of information, including and, cell phone tower identification data, wireless hotspot identification, and timestamps.


text:
User talk:A.F.828

-- 13:26, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:A.F.828


text:
Thread:Comments:Mother of slain Army Ranger calls for removal of General McChrystal from committee/President Obama Betrays Tillman Family (Again) by Appointing Gen. McChrystal & CNAS to Run "Joining Forces" Program/reply

This is not a betrayal to the Tillman family or anyone else. Since when do people get punished eternally for their mistakes / transgressions? General McChrystal made some poor choices. He paid the price for those choices, and that is all in the past now. At some point he must be allowed to move on and move forward. As a Special Operations commander, he knows full well the extremes of the strains that can be placed on the military member and their family. I think he is a fine choice and should be given a chance to execute the duties of his new office without bias towards past mistakes.


text:
User talk:自分専用

-- 13:32, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:自分専用


text:
User talk:Swamirajeshwari

-- 13:36, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Swamirajeshwari


text:
Template:Weak oppose/doc

Usage

Generates on a page.

title: Template:Weak oppose/doc


text:
User talk:Deejustify

-- 13:41, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Deejustify


text:
Massachusetts study finds links between bullying and family violence

April 24, 2011

Both and their victims are linked with an increased incidence of violence in the home, according to a report on Massachusetts middle and high school students released on Thursday.

In a survey of 5,807 students in 138 schools covering incidents in the past year, about 25 percent  of middle school students and 16 percent of high school students  reported being bullied  at school.

Between 13 to 15 percent of victims of bullying said they had seen violence in their families  or been physically injured by a family member during the same time frame.

Students who were identified as  being both bullied and victimized by a bully (called "bully-victims" in the study) were the most likely to report they had been physically injured by a family member, compared to those who said they were neither a victim nor a bully. They also reported a higher frequency of  or attempted suicide  than victims or bullies who were not bully-victims.

"Sometimes, people who we have thought of as perpetrators are actually very vulnerable themselves," said John Auerbach, Commissioner of whose agency collected  on  5,807 middle and high school students for the study.

The results, analyzed  by the  (CDC) and the Massachusetts Department of Public Health, also confirmed prior findings that bulling is associated  with an increased incidence of suicidal ideation and attempted suicide, poor grades and drug abuse. The CDC said the report is the first detailed, state-level analysis of the risk factors  for school bullying.

Last year a 15-year-old Massachusetts student  of  committed suicide, focusing the state on the issue of bullying. In May 2010 Massachusetts passed legislation outlawing bullying in school and online, outlining procedures for the investigation and reporting of bullying, and establishing school programs to prevent retaliation. This study was completed a year later.

The finding that there is a link between bullying and family violence shows the importance of involving families in programs and strategies addressing bullying.

"A comprehensive approach that encompasses school officials, students and their families is needed to prevent bullying among middle school and high school students," said CDC researchers.


text:
User talk:Dead Mars

-- 13:44, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dead Mars


text:
User talk:Sanjiv1Khullar

-- 13:48, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sanjiv1Khullar


text:
User talk:IPhysicist

-- 14:09, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:IPhysicist


text:
Talk:Apple collecting location data from iPhone, iPad

Chance to expand(?)
Might I suggest anyone with an Android phone take a good look at this too? What if you use Google Maps? Is the information stored in the phone - or in Google's database?

Screaming about an iPhone doing this seems a little overly alarmist when there are dozens of other ways the data can be stored.

I can, from speaking with him a couple of times, say this is exactly why Richard Stallman never carries a cellphone; he doesn't even trust them not to log his location whilst supposedly 'switched off'. --Brian McNeil / talk 14:21, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

 * I agree with you, Android phones do, do the same thing, and people are being overly alarmist. I tried to revise the article to make it more neutral and state more of the facts, including the Android bit. I think most people need to understand that the primary purpose for collecting this data is to enable feature that the users not only use, but demand. People are being seriously over alrmist if they think they as individuals are so important or special that a company like Apple or Google is actually interested in their personal location. The data is all collected and aggregated, there is nothing nefarious about it. Tadpole256 (talk) 14:59, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

WTF are "Spammy Bits?
What was spam like in the article as I had it? Fetchcom took an article and decimated it, cutting it down into a blurb! I don't know if I have the energy or motivation to repair the damage... Tadpole256 (talk) 21:37, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Took a minute, but I was able to fix most of it and turn it back into a proper article... Revised some wording, smoothed some things out, restored a lot of vital information that was removed by amateur hour editing, but I think it's better over all. Still feels like it could use a little smoothing, but should be ready for release. Tadpole256 (talk) 21:59, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

 * I'm sorry, but some of what you added reads like a blog. We should not be using "you" or "your". In addition, not all the information re-added was supported by the sources. Ii suspect you re-added the near-copyvio/closely paraphrased bits, too. Incredible.
 * I'd hardly consider my work incredible, but it was better than the article as it stands now is. Tadpole256 (talk) 13:47, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

 * "Apple's iPhone and iPad are attracting a lot of scrutiny in light of the recent discovery that the devices may be secretly saving personal data about where you have been." The data is not secret. Also, see my comment above about using "you".
 * You need lessons in compelling writing. People have to be interested in reading a story. Read some news papers, then get back to me. Tadpole256 (talk) 13:47, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
 * "You" assumes the reader owns one of these devices. (I don't much like it, either, but that's another point entirely.) Also, not secret stands, unless of course you can raise a valid objection to that. Sensationalism to attract interest does not fit with quality and is not the path we have decided to take. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 14:11, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

 * "However, users can opt to encrypt the file when they synch their iPhone or iPad with their computer." Other than the misspelling of "sync", which source states this?
 * Apple says this. The iPhone / iPad set-up says this. I own both. It's a fact. Don't be mad. Just give the people the pertinent data. Tadpole256 (talk) 13:47, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Something being true does not change the fact that something must be sourced. For the record, I would accept a fairly detailed explanation of how to get that information from an iPhone and an iPad and the above statement of ownership as valid, though I would prefer a link. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 14:11, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

 * Re. false statement about Google's decline to comment: "Google declined to comment on the findings.". I changed the article to say that they commented on maps usage, but not directly to the latest findings, which is what the WSJ source says.
 * Well that's a little better, it looks pretty asinine to write "google refused to comment" immediately after a line that starts with "according to google". This is one of the reasons I called the edits Amateur hour. Just don't take it personally, keep working towards a better product and you'll learn as you go. We all make mistakes.Tadpole256 (talk) 13:47, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

 * "Apple relies on the data to enable it's "find my phone" capability offered to those who subscribe to the optional "Mobile Me" services. " Disregarding the improper use of "it's" (could you please, please, copyedit before re-adding material that was removed for a good reason?), I can't find any mention of MobileMe in the sources.
 * Go to the Apple Web site, or by an iPhone. Does even common knowledge have to be sourced? Fine, the source is me. Don't be dippy, just leave pertinent information in. Tadpole256 (talk) 13:47, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
 * "Go to the Apple Web site" - such is not cited as a source in this article. "[O]r by[sic] an iPhone" - I trust you'll be paying for it, and a motorcycle courier to get it to me in a reasonable timeframe for a review? This is not common knowledge except among owners of the devices; again, as above, if you'd actually said you did and explained things here on the talk page that would be fine. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 14:11, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

 * "Re. the open source software ... etc., that's for the previous discovery of the unsecured file; the sources for this news story do not focus on that event, but rather on a different discovery of different data, and therefore the mention of the software is irrelevant to the article's focus.
 * You could not be more wrong. The open source software only works now because the file in unencrypted. In previous versions of the OS the file was encrypted, and thus inaccessible. This is a new development! Why don't you do some reading and learn a thing or two about a subject before you try to butcher someone else's article on it. That's basic journalism. Tadpole256 (talk) 13:47, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm not going to comment on the dispute itself, but will note that if the subject isn't clear to an intelligent person without foreknowledge when they come to read an article, then the article does not meet our (high) standards. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 14:11, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Tadpole, I think you are missing the fact that there are two different sets of data: the unsecured one in the file, which Apple has clearly said is not transmitted off the device; and the data they collect and send to a secure database. I can't find any sources saying the unsecured data is the one they are sending to a remote server.  — fetch · comms  23:20, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

 * Lastly, the article after my edits was certainly not a "blurb" (which is only a few sentences in length), but rather a decently copyedited article that followed the sources. Because the sources do not support everything and the tone is in places not newsworthy, I have restored my version. I will happily restore your edits and give them a proper copyedit if you can present the sources that support all the material. (Given that the WSJ has already contradicted one of your comments, I am unsure how that will work.) It is worth noting that bickering over a few bytes of text will not get this article reviewed, so if we want to see it published, then adherence to the style guide and sources is mandatory. Best,  — fetch · comms  02:01, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Don't worry leave your crap version up, I will publish the better version myself. I see there is going to be a lot of need for me to do that around here, between under qualified reviewers and slow reviews (which have gotten better) It's amazing this site has lasted so long. It's a shame too, so much potential... Tadpole256 (talk) 13:47, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

 * As a final note, I do not want to see this descend into a theatre of war or breach of WN:E. We've pretty much all breached that at some point or other - I've breached that, I've breached it very badly - but it's time we started sticking to it. The policies we have are actually okay if we pay them some attention. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 14:11, 23 April 2011 (UTC)


text: Talk:All US states could have smoke-free laws by 2020


text: Comments:All US states could have smoke-free laws by 2020


text:
User talk:Bradydelahanty

-- 14:39, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bradydelahanty


text:
User talk:MohamedElkashlan

-- 14:51, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:MohamedElkashlan


text:
User talk:Jmasdouglas

-- 15:00, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jmasdouglas


text:
User talk:Murdealamihai

-- 15:14, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Murdealamihai


text:
User talk:RicardoZ91

-- 15:16, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:RicardoZ91


text:
User talk:Павел 97

-- 15:19, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Павел 97


text: Template:CURRENTMINUTE

title: Template:CURRENTMINUTE


text:
User talk:Monyada

-- 15:27, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Monyada


text:
User talk:Shiver of recognition

-- 15:27, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Shiver of recognition


text:
Template:CURRENTMINUTE/doc

Usage

A pseudo-magic word to go with { {CURRENTHOUR}}.

title: Template:CURRENTMINUTE/doc


text:
User talk:Rdheepak

-- 15:36, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rdheepak


text:
User talk:1Dbad

-- 15:41, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:1Dbad


text:
User talk:Clare705

-- 15:52, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Clare705


text:
User talk:Nith4bonit4

-- 15:52, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nith4bonit4


text: Comments:UK newspapers face libel, privacy action over murder coverage


text:
Thread:Comments:All US states could have smoke-free laws by 2020/Comments from feedback form - "The wording of the fourth para..."

The wording of the fourth paragraph comes off as rather biased: "Southern and western states are lagging in implementing smoking bans."


text:
User talk:Stupendo2009

-- 16:19, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Stupendo2009


text:
User talk:Titangap

-- 16:22, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Titangap


text:
User talk:T kns

-- 16:25, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:T kns


text:
User talk:Greeyn

-- 16:30, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Greeyn


text:
User talk:Jorgomanushi

-- 16:36, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jorgomanushi


text:
User talk:SuperDutchGuy

-- 16:44, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:SuperDutchGuy


text:
User talk:Luoxiaofang42

-- 16:46, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

 * Knowledge Idea

title: User talk:Luoxiaofang42


text:
User talk:Raoulis

-- 16:55, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Raoulis


text:
User talk:Fatimagimsi

-- 17:03, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Fatimagimsi


text:
Thread:Comments:All US states could have smoke-free laws by 2020/Comments from feedback form - "The wording of the fourth para..."/reply

As far as i can tell this is a very biased article. The writer is clearly in favor of anti-smoking laws.


text:
User talk:Elvismema

-- 17:25, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Elvismema


text:
User talk:Sean80822

-- 18:08, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sean80822


text:
Thread:Comments:Amazon server outage affects Reddit, other websites/Comments from feedback form - "Lack of information, even if t..."

Lack of information, even if there might not be more available at the current time, I still feel it lacking


text:
User talk:MaxPayne96

-- 18:11, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:MaxPayne96


text:
User talk:Fatehrawkey

-- 18:14, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Fatehrawkey


text:
User talk:Zahitcihan

-- 18:15, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Zahitcihan


text:
User talk:Tedmouse

-- 18:16, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tedmouse


text:
User talk:Ucreateshare

-- 18:27, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ucreateshare


text:
User talk:Santiagolinari

-- 18:28, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Santiagolinari


text:
Thread:Comments:All US states could have smoke-free laws by 2020/Comments from feedback form - "The wording of the fourth para..."/reply (2)

>implying that's a bad thing


text:
User talk:WhisperingWisdom

-- 18:48, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:WhisperingWisdom


text:
User talk:Princeofpalms

-- 19:02, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Princeofpalms


text:
User talk:Simplysakka

-- 19:08, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Simplysakka


text:
California employees owe state US$13.3 million in unpaid loans

April 24, 2011 The California office reports that eleven state agencies have given US$13.3 million in pay and travel advances that have not been collected.

Governor Jerry Brown issued an executive order to recover uncollected loans by the agencies. A press release from the governor's office states, "The Governor’s Executive Order seeks to recover taxpayer dollars by directing state agencies and departments to clear salary and travel advances within 30 days through an expense claim." Any outstanding balance will be deducted from employees' paychecks under the governor's order after the 30 days.

Under California state law, state employees are permitted to receive advances for hardship, travel, and other circumstances. These advances cannot be collected by agencies after three years without the employee's consent.

State Controller John Chiang said in a statement, "The state’s poor debt collection and accounting practices are fleecing public coffers at a time when vital public programs are being decimated by unprecedented budget cuts." Chiang's office expects there will be more money unaccounted for, including some from the (CHP). California state law mandates that anyone convicted of driving under the influence of alcohol is required to pay for the investigation. The CHP has not collected this money.

The, also called Caltrans, has the largest debt of the eleven agencies: $3.2 million. , or the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, "had an outstanding balance of $1.44 million as of June 30, 2008. An overwhelming portion of that balance was related to employee salary and travel advances," according to a controller's office audit.

Chiang's office had informed former California governor Arnold Schwarzenegger there were outstanding debts, but Schwarzenegger's administration did not take action.

All eleven agencies have agreed to hand over any delinquent accounts to the controller's office, who will collect these debts.


text:
User talk:Chantharan

-- 19:26, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Chantharan


text:
User talk:Trismagi

-- 19:29, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Trismagi


text:
User talk:Jonomw

-- 19:34, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jonomw


text:
User talk:Davey2010

-- 19:35, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikinews
Welcome to Wikinews. :) If you have a question, please ask. :) --LauraHale (talk) 06:31, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi
If you like news here on WikiNews would you be able to write ever so often? Thanks. @Davey2010 BigKrow (talk) 00:47, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

title: User talk:Davey2010


text:
User talk:Thesaminal

-- 19:37, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Thesaminal


text:
User talk:Bahram Saleem

-- 19:38, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bahram Saleem


text:
User talk:Shahab220

-- 19:54, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Shahab220


text:
User talk:Iwiy

-- 19:55, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Iwiy


text:
MediaWiki:Common.css/User:Mono/Sandbox2

//

title: MediaWiki:Common.css/User:Mono/Sandbox2


text:
User talk:Maczunk

-- 20:03, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Maczunk


text:
Comments:French agency CNES to release UFO archives on the Internet

Comments from feedback form - "i want more"
i want more —70.255.82.89 (talk) 20:04, 22 April 2011 (UTC)


text:
User talk:Camkey1

-- 20:06, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Camkey1


text:
'Apple's data is dirtiest,' says Greenpeace

April 24, 2011

In a report on issued this week, the environmental group Greenpeace rated ten top Internet companies, including Apple, Google, Twitter and Amazon, on several factors such as each company's willingness to be transparent by providing information on its energy sources and the  of its.

In the report entitled "How Dirty is your Data", Apple, while receiving good marks for transparency, rated at the bottom for energy efficiency, primarily because its huge, new data center in North Carolina, called iDataCenter, relies largely on coal. Although Apple claimed its California operations used than that produced by most, iDataCenter has an estimated energy demand three times Apple's current use, significantly increasing Apple's. As Apple increases the online products it delivers from its platform, it will enlarge its cloud computing operations further.

"Apple's decision to locate its iDataCenter in North Carolina, which has an electrical grid among the dirtiest in the country (61 percent coal, 31 percent nuclear), indicates a lack of a corporate commitment to clean energy supply for its cloud operations," Greenpeace said in its report.

About 2 percent of worldwide energy use is consumed by data center computer servers, and this amount is increasing by 12 percent a year, Greenpeace reports, an energy demand that is more than that of Russia.

Greenpeace said many do not reveal the environmental impact of their energy consumption, and concentrate more on energy efficiency that on using clean energy. Most of their energy is supplied by coal and nuclear energy. Companies are locating their data centers in areas that afford cheap, abundant coal-powered electricity.

Yahoo was praised by Greenpeace for placing its data centers near sources of clean energy and its minor use of coal-based power.

Greenpeace noted that Google says that it is conscious of the need to use renewable sources of electricity to power cloud computing, but it does not acknowledge the size of its. The company claims it has seven data centers worldwide, but it is estimated to have 20 to 30. The carbon footprint of cloud computing is a recent emphasis of Greenpeace in its attempt to disprove the belief that the biggest are.

In a response to the report, Timothy Prickett Morgan criticized Greenpeace for focusing on data centers which are responsible for using about 3 per cent of the US power generation and globally account for 1.5 to 2 percent. He noted that "the data centers of Amazon, Google, Yahoo!, Facebook, Twitter, IBM, Hewlett-Packard, Microsoft, Apple, and Akamai . . . are probably not much different from the business where you work every day when it comes to dependency on coal for electricity generation. And ditto for the home that you return to every night."

Morgan quotes data from a 2008 report by the and cited  by the World Coal Association, now known as the, that showed coal plants produce over 40 percent of the global electricity. The Institute determined that United States receives half of its power from coal plants. Some other countries, such as South Africa, Poland and China, use more coal. "The world is still dependent on non-renewable energy sources – coal and nuclear with a smattering of oil and gas – to generate electricity," he says, suggesting the IT companies should not be singled out.

Morgan is also critical of Greenpeace's methodology in gathering the data, as it included only a sample of the data centers of these companies, and some that were not yet completely operational. He noted that because the companies were not always cooperative in disclosing information, Greenpeace estimated a portion of the data. He said that the reader has to "drill down into the report" to see the the complete picture.

Another criticism of Greenpeace is its definition of coal and nuclear power as "dirty energy". Because it does not discharge greenhouse gases, nuclear power is rated more favorably than coal by some environmental organizations. Greenpeace is adamantly against nuclear power's radiation risks.


text: Template:Convertnamespace

title: Template:Convertnamespace


text:
Template:Convertnamespace/doc

This template takes a page name as its only parameter, and outputs the namespace ID associated with it, similar to the magic word { { NAMESPACE}}, that outputs the namespace name.

title: Template:Convertnamespace/doc


text:
User talk:Spicy Gyro

-- 20:21, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Spicy Gyro


text:
User talk:Moneya

-- 20:22, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Moneya


text:
User talk:Vitorsingleboy

-- 20:28, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Vitorsingleboy


text:
User talk:CU4ever

-- 20:29, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:CU4ever


text:
User talk:Richard love veronica

-- 20:42, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Richard love veronica


text: Template:Customscript

title: Template:Customscript


text: Category:Gulf of Mexico

title: Category:Gulf of Mexico


text:
User talk:Bjcafr

-- 20:59, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bjcafr


text:
User talk:Kicking and Screaming

-- 21:00, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kicking and Screaming


text:
User talk:Flako u

-- 21:00, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Flako u


text: Category:Jerry Brown

title: Category:Jerry Brown


text:
Template:Customscript/doc

This template attempts to link to any all-user custom scripting in effect on a certain page.

Usage

 * on a talk page.

title: Template:Customscript/doc


text:
User talk:Jlvalero

-- 21:44, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jlvalero


text:
User talk:Pfifer11

-- 21:54, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Pfifer11


text:
User talk:HarryArmy

-- 22:06, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:HarryArmy


text: Comments:Netanyahu pushed previous prime minister Olmert to attack Iran, according to Wikileaks cables


text:
User:Microchip08/Prison

Absconds
The table above shows the number of prisoners who have absconded and who remain unlawfully at large. The columns represent the year in which the prisoner originally absconded. Data is published annually one quarter in arrears. Crown copyright.

Escapes
{| class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align:center;" !Prison !1995/96 !1996/97 !1997/98 !1998/99 !1999/00 !2000/01 !2001/02 !2002/03 !2003/04 !2004/05 !2005/06 !2006/07 !2007/08 !2008/09 !2009/10 !Aldington !Altcourse !Ashwell !Belmarsh !Birmingham !Blantyre House !Blundeston !Brinsford !Bristol !Brixton !Buckley Hall !Bullingdon !Cardiff !Castington !Coldingley !Dartmoor !Deerbolt !Doncaster !Dover !Downview !Eastwood Park !Erlestoke !Everthorpe !Exeter !Featherstone !Feltham !Ford !Foston Hall !Glen Parva !Gloucester !Grendon !Guys Marsh !Haslar !Haverigg !Hollesley Bay !Hull !Huntercombe !Kirklevington !Lancaster !Latchmere House !Leicester !Lincoln !Lindholme !Littlehey !Liverpool !Low Newton !Lowdham Grange !Mount !Norwich !Parc !Parkhurst !Pentonville !Portland !Ranby !Risley !Rochester !Rye Hill (contracted) !Send !Stafford !Stocken !Styal !Thorn Cross !Verne !Wealstun !Weare !Wellingborough !Werrington !Wetherby !Winchester !Wormwood Scrubs !
 * + Escapes from prisons (ex. 'escorts')
 * 6
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 3
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 4
 * 1
 * 4
 * 1
 * 4
 * 4
 * 4
 * 4
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 4
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 2
 * 2
 * 2
 * 2
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 2
 * 2
 * 2
 * 2
 * 2
 * 2
 * 2
 * 2
 * 2
 * 1
 * 2
 * 2
 * 2
 * 2
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 3
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 4
 * 1
 * 4
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 2
 * 2
 * 2
 * 1
 * 1
 * 3
 * 3
 * 3
 * 3
 * 3
 * 3
 * 3
 * 2
 * 1
 * 3
 * 2
 * 1
 * 3
 * 3
 * 3
 * 3
 * 1
 * 1
 * 2
 * 1
 * 2
 * 1
 * 2
 * 1
 * 2
 * 1
 * 3
 * 3
 * 3
 * 3
 * 3
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 8
 * 1
 * 8
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 2
 * 2
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 2
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 3
 * 2
 * 2
 * 2
 * 2
 * 2
 * 3
 * 3
 * 4
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 3
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 3
 * 3
 * 3
 * 3
 * 3
 * 2
 * 2
 * 2
 * 2
 * 2
 * 2
 * 2
 * 1
 * 3
 * 3
 * 2
 * 3
 * 3
 * 3
 * 3
 * 3
 * 3
 * 3
 * 3
 * 3
 * 2
 * 3
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 4
 * 4
 * 4
 * 4
 * 4
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 5
 * 6
 * 1
 * 5
 * 2
 * 1
 * 5
 * 2
 * 5
 * 2
 * 2
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 2
 * 3
 * 3
 * 3
 * 3
 * 5
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 4
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1
 * 2
 * 1
 * 1
 * 1

title: User:Microchip08/Prison


text:
Thread:Comments:Situation at damaged nuclear power plant remains 'very grave', says Japanese Prime Minister/boom/reply (3)

As it should have been from the beginning:P. That doesn't change the fact that Chernobyl was *way* worse than what happened in Japan. Those rating systems are... broad, to say the least.


text:
User talk:Mrlitsta

-- 22:21, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mrlitsta


text:
Thread:Comments:Netanyahu pushed previous prime minister Olmert to attack Iran, according to Wikileaks cables/Comments from feedback form - "I'm really surprised that wiki..."

I'm really surprised that wikinews have a unbiased article about Israel.


text:
User talk:Victuallers

-- 23:13, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for thr welcome Victuallers (talk) 11:49, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Victuallers


text:
User talk:Patricia Varise

-- 23:13, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Patricia Varise


text:
User talk:Cronopio64

-- 23:28, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Cronopio64


text:
User talk:Orlybg

-- 23:29, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Orlybg


text:
User talk:Daehong55

-- 23:34, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Daehong55


text:
User talk:Yen at the Bridge

-- 23:34, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Yen at the Bridge


text:
User talk:Akrolsmir

-- 00:01, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Akrolsmir


text:
User talk:Kath1122

-- 00:12, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kath1122


text:
User talk:Marek Genius

-- 00:26, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Marek Genius


text:
User talk:Brooklinr9

-- 00:27, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Brooklinr9


text:
Thread:Comments:Standard & Poor's lowers the U.S. credit outlook to 'negative'/And people want to keep cutting taxes?/reply (8)

I'm not sure how you can call them "cash-hungry" if they're cutting taxes... that's like calling Gandhi "a glutton" while on his hunger strike.


text:
Thread:Comments:Afghanistan general Stanley McChrystal cleared of wrongdoing/Comments from feedback form - "The last thing the US needs is..."/reply

And will Obama apologize and resign for this blunder? All signs point to NO.


text:
Thread:Comments:Schoolboy dies in Gaza after bus hit by rockets/Tragedy/Another Reason/reply (6)

Can't make an omelet without breaking a few eggs. The world suffers no great loss.


text:
User talk:IsisF87

-- 00:43, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:IsisF87


text:
User talk:Nestor chacin

-- 01:03, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nestor chacin


text:
User talk:Jean-Louis Lascoux

-- 01:04, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jean-Louis Lascoux


text:
Thread:Comments:All US states could have smoke-free laws by 2020/Comments from feedback form - "The wording of the fourth para..."/reply (3)

Thats good. People need to use common sense.


text:
User talk:Vova Solomatin

-- 01:22, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Vova Solomatin


text:
User talk:Johnnei

-- 01:58, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Johnnei


text:
Comments:'Apple's data is dirtiest,' says Greenpeace

Huh?
I want to know one thing. Who is Timothy Prickett Morgan and why do his comments matter? This is terrible journalism. You can't introduce some random person without explaining in a short little sentence, who he is, what position he holds and therefore why his opinion matters. Does he work for Apple? Is he a University professor or is he some nutjob dragged off the streets?

You can't expect someone to look at your sources and then click on the link to try and figure out who he is. So he wrote an article. Big deal. Why'd you choose him? Why not Tiffany Hsu or Nathan Eddy?

There aren't always two sides to a story. Here, there is only one side. Greenpeace's side. There are no other sides to the story, because nobody on the opposing side has put in their two cents. So you don't report the other side because there isn't one. If later someone from Google or Yahoo does pipe up to attack Greenpeace's report, then by all means, report on it.

My suggestion would be to delete Timothy Pricett Morgan's comments from the article altogether. Or at least explain who he is, so we can judge about whether his comments matter or not. 193.30.232.1 (talk) 12:20, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

I agree that this is sloppy journalism. It is sad that there doesn't seem to be much incentive to have good journalism. Good journalism costs more but you generally get something a little more real out of it. Bad journalism generates trash. The worst thing is to have bad journalism support your views. Look at Michael Moore's works. I feel bad for people who think they way he does because when you see him lying, twisting and editing speeches and appealing to those who don't know as experts, it makes his side look like their opinions are all based on false data. If their is true data there, it is corrupted by the false. The worst part of this is that many who don't know the way journalism is supposed to get at the truth rather than market a point of view or political ideology buy these lies as the complete and whole truth.

Comments from feedback form - "Greenpeace shouldn't be going ..."
Greenpeace shouldn't be going after the Internet companies, but rather the energy companies that are actually responsible for supplying the nation's energy. —67.167.244.119 (talk) 05:40, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Great point!Tadpole256 (talk) 20:25, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

I wouldn't trust anything Greenpeace has to say. They are a lunatic fringe group set out to destroy anything they see as capitalist. Tadpole256 (talk) 02:03, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

Yemen Is King
Apple moved simply because the price of electricity in NC is much lower than in California. "the cost to Apple for electricity will be 4-5 cents per kilowatt hour in North Carolina from Duke Energy versus 7-12 cents per kilowatt hour in California." All because of California's reliance on renewable resources. And that is exactly what Greenpeace hates and tries to conceal.--90.177.208.162 (talk) 07:01, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Also an excellent point! We should be investing more money in cheap, clean nuclear power.Tadpole256 (talk) 20:28, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Note go here for milk: mudkipz.ws

Greenpeace can suck it
Greenpeace is an anti-capitalist organization. They use the environment as cover for what they do. Think about everything they do and then think about whoever they are protesting. Is it a large corporation that is making money for its shareholders? Apple and Google are the latest examples. Two highly profitable companies providing technology to their customers and Greenpeace's beef is that the energy they use comes largely from dirty coal.

I TOTALLY AGREE!!!! You are SO RIGHT!!!

What counts as dirty?
It is interesting to see that the 31% nuclear energy of North Carolina is considered dirty. I know that it is a long way from carbon neutrality due to high engineering and mining requirements but does not produce as much CO2 as coal. The trouble I find with 'studies' like these from organisations such as greenpeace is that they attempt a scientific approach (as opposed to a purely emotional one) but fail to be specific enough to give any of their statistics any clear credibility. 1) what does 'dirty' mean? I suspect it was chosen for its soundbite properties. 2) catagorise unenvironmental impacts; direct CO2 emmisions, indirect CO2 emmisions, waste - amounts, composition, facilities locally for either treatment or storage. Environmental damage from radiation is not even on the same scale as that from fossil fuels yet they seem to rank nuclear power at least equal to and sometimes over oil gas and coal in 'dirtyness'.

--- The problem is that nuclear energy is not trendy. That's what greenpeace is all about; they don't REALLY care about the environment and global warming, all they want is to be on the trendy side so they can pretend to be cool. For some reason nuclear energy isn't considered cool among trendy people, even though it's one of the cleanest forms of energy (my theory is that the word "nuclear" gained a negative connotation during the cold war); and with the media feasting on the Fukushima accident (and ignoring that it was caused by the largest earthquake that hit Japan in recorded history) this situation is unfortunately unlikely to change. Ungoliant MMDCCLXIV (talk) 13:45, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Comments from feedback form - "http://upload.wikimedia.org/wi..."
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f9/Full_Star_Red.svg/25px-Full_Star_Red.svg.png —79.97.104.217 (talk) 20:13, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Comments from feedback form - "Nuclear releases greenhouses g..."
Nuclear releases greenhouses gases in all processes but the actual electricity generation progress. It also happens to be extremely dangerous. If you think GreenPeace is leftist, note that that Democratic Party of HK supports the anti-nuclear stance. —Kayau (talk · contribs) 06:25, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Being totally anti-nuclear isn't "leftist" or "rightist". It's just ignorant. Relying completely on renewables for energy supply is impractical, especially if you want to electrify transport. I strongly recommend David MacKay's free book where he actually does the sums on this.
 * Almost everything releases CO2 at some point. Sure nuclear plants are big construction projects, but then so are wind farms and hydroelectric dams. And don't even get me started on the mining for the materials used in solar panels. However over a total lifetime all will be better than coal power stations.
 * As for nuclear being dangerous, it's actually one of the safest forms of power generation. See The triumph of coal marketing infographic. the wub "?!"  09:24, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Very interesting links you provided. Everyone should read them. Thanks, Mattisse (talk) 12:43, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Comments from feedback form - "test"
test —116.99.41.205 (talk) 06:44, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Comments from feedback form - "I appreciate that you want the..."
I appreciate that you want the companies to receive their power from green sources but are you suggesting that you have people avoid areas that use coal power so that the areas that the businesses move to can't get the funds from supporting these centers of business to upgrade to new sources of power. What about reliable sources of power. When Green Power generated from wind or sun is not providing the appropriate power on a calm or cloudy day, these business would close if it were not for fossle fuel plants that were in place to carry the load. Then we have the ultimate in green power. Nuclear power is green because it doesn't generate harmful gases and yet it isn't supported by many who want green power because of the byproduct and the lack of renewablility of the fuel. I say that when oil was refined there were many discoveries that use the byproduct of oil refining. These discoveries have made our entire civilization better. We need to focus on uses of spent radioactive fuel rather than trying to store it. I think that articles like these focus on punishing those companies that dare to do business outside the areas that laudably had the foresight and funding set up green power grids. I think that we will see as the technology gets better that green energy will be cost effective as well as planet healthy but we aren't there yet and even when we get there, we may still need fossil fuels as a backup. I think the ulimate goal is to only use them as a backup. My big frustration about articles of this type is that they are written in a way and to an audience that is not experts in these fields so that they can sway popular opinion on emotions often in the face of the facts and trends. —214.27.58.2 (talk) 02:35, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I reflected what the sources said to the best of my ability. I did not give my own opinion. Mattisse (talk) 00:40, 8 June 2011 (UTC)


text:
User talk:Starwarsdarthmaul7

-- 02:13, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Starwarsdarthmaul7


text: Talk:Murderer of road accident victim sentenced to death


text: Comments:Murderer of road accident victim sentenced to death


text:
User talk:Roboticboy

-- 02:29, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Roboticboy


text:
Category:Recipients of the Purple Heart Medal

These are users who have received the, for wounds sustained in combat while serving in the U.S. Military.


text:
Thread:Comments:Netanyahu pushed previous prime minister Olmert to attack Iran, according to Wikileaks cables/Comments from feedback form - "I'm really surprised that wiki..."/reply

I suppose we should take that as a compliment...


text:
User talk:Ane diamond

-- 03:04, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ane diamond


text:
User talk:GuillermoMtz

-- 03:06, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:GuillermoMtz


text:
User talk:Zahtshin

-- 03:11, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Zahtshin


text:
User talk:Raysantos12

-- 03:15, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Raysantos12