text:
Al Sharpton speaks out on race, rights and what bothers him about his critics

December 3, 2007 At David Shankbone told his  middle class family that he was to interview  that Saturday. The announcement caused an impassioned discussion about the civil rights leader's work, the problems facing the community and whether Sharpton helps or hurts his cause. Opinion was divided. "He's an opportunist." "He only stirs things up." "Why do I always see his face when there's a problem?"

Shankbone went to the 's headquarters in Harlem with this Thanksgiving discussion to inform the conversation. Below is his interview with Al Sharpton on everything from, his purported feud with Barack Obama, criticism by influential African Americans such as , his experience running for President, to how he never expected he would see fifty (he is now 53). "People would say to me, 'Now that I hear you, even if I disagree with you I don’t think you’re as bad as I thought,'" said Sharpton. "I would say, 'Let me ask you a question: what was "bad as you thought"?' And they couldn’t say. They don’t know why they think you’re bad, they just know you’re supposed to be bad because the right wing tells them you’re bad."

Sharpton's beginnings in the movement
'''David Shankbone: You grew up around so many great American musicians and singers like  and.
 * Al Sharpton: I grew up in the black church. I started preaching at four as a wonderboy preacher.  The church that I grew up in, Washington Temple  in Brooklyn, was a hot spot for gospel singers. It was probably a mega-church before there were mega-churches., who was the bishop of the church, had about 5,000 members in the late fifties and early sixties. All the gospel greats would come to the church. Because I was the wonderboy preacher, and I had my own little church celebrity, I got to know all the gospel singers. It began my early dealing with the entertainment world, through the gospel singing. In , Mahalia Jackson had me preach and she sang there that night. Then I did a few other cities with her.

'''DS: What was that like touring with Mahalia Jackson?
 * AS: It was fascinating to me. Here I am a little kid, I’m not even ten years old, and Mahalia Jackson was arguably the preeminent gospel artist of that time. It was quite a charge to me. A lot of times now I land into LaGuardia Airport and you see the circular, which was the New York pavilion of the World’s Fair, and that’s where I preached when I was nine years old. I think about that a lot flying in, that night with Mahalia Jackson. Now that’s wow, 47-years ago.

'''DS: Did you keep in touch with her throughout her life? Did she have a presence in yours?
 * AS: Not as closely as James Brown. We would run into each other. She died when I was still very much in my teens. Madame Ernestine Washington, who was the first lady of the church I grew up in, she was a gospel singer. I knew a lot of the gospel greats. James Brown and I got close in my teen years. What happened was when I was around 12 or 13, had come to the church and I got totally mesmerized by, who was the Congressman in Harlem and a , so I wanted to get involved politically. The church that I was in was Pentecostal; I’m now . But it was Pentecostal, and it wasn’t that involved in social justice, although Bishop Washington was. Bishop Washington said he didn’t want me to get involved with the more militant groups, because at that time you had the  and a lot of others.  So he brought me to , who was head of Operation Breadbasket, SCLC, in New York, who later became my pastor after Bishop Washington died.  Reverend Jones converted me Baptist from Pentecostal. They knew who I was because of my preaching as a little boy.  I became the youth director in New York of SCLC Operation Breadbasket.  King had just gotten killed; this is 1969 and he had gotten killed the year before. I met King, but I didn’t know him. I was 12, 13 years old.  But I got to know Dr. Abernathy, who succeeded him—

'''DS: Ralph Abernathy?
 * AS: . The Director nationally of was, who was in his late twenties, early thirties. It was interesting, because Jesse Jackson’s age and my age gap was the same as his and King’s. Jackson at that time had a big afro and a medallion. He became a hero to me. Adam Clayton Powell, who had been my hero, had retired and moved so I became a protégé of Reverend Jackson. We became close.

James Brown: a father to Sharpton
'''DS: Are you still close to Reverend Jackson?
 * AS: Yeah, we talk. In 1971, when Jackson left over whatever their problems were with each other—that’s when he left to form Operation Push—I also left the SCLC in protest because I was close to Reverend Jackson. I took my youth division with me and formed, which was my organization. Jesse didn’t have an organization here in New York. When I formed it, maybe about a year, six months later, a young guy joined the organization from Georgia — he would come up here thinking about going to college — named Teddy.  Teddy’s father was James Brown. Teddy got killed in a car accident in upstate New York. He and I were the same age, sixteen. James Brown came to New York and the disc jockeys here told him about this young preacher his son liked. He decided he’d do a memorial concert for his son for my youth group.  He talked to me, he liked me, and of course this was, like, The Icon. He became like the father I didn’t have after my parents separated, and I became like Teddy, his ambitious young son.  He had other kids, but they were not as old as Teddy and they didn’t have the ambition, so we started a father-son relationship.

'''DS: How did James Brown’s death affect you?
 * AS: Oh, I don’t think anything has affected me more.

'''DS: He was such an icon, but then to also have had this deeply personal relationship must have had an extraordinary impact on you.
 * AS: James Brown was the father I never had. I traveled with him; he financed my youth group. I met my wife — we’re no longer together — when she was his background singer. He put my kids in private school. I styled my hair after him; he actually styled my hair after his. What I do functionally is what Dr. King, Reverend Jackson and the movement are all about; but I learned manhood from James Brown. I always say that James Brown taught me how to be a man.

'''DS: What was one lesson that he taught you?
 * AS: Determination. Don’t be afraid to listen to your inner ear. James Brown changed music; he changed the beat of music. I learned from him to trust your inner ear, go by your own beat. I remember in the 1970’s when disco became popular he refused to water down his music, and it ended up his music became the basis of funk and rap and all that. I watched him deal with adversity and go to jail. When he was in jail I went and saw him every month, and I went and preached for him. He never gave up, he was very determined. He taught me how to take adversity and use it to your advantage.

'''DS: There is so much anger at injustice, and that anger can fell a person’s ability to right wrongs, or can steer them down a bad path. You have been able to take your anger and use it productively. When you come across a young person who is angry at the world around them, what kind of advice do you give them?
 * AS: The challenge is to learn that your anger can fuel you in achieving things that can eradicate what you’re angry about; or your anger can consume and defeat you. I’m known for fighting racial bias, police misconduct, and things against poor people. I can either be strategic to say this is Plan A, B and C to get racial profiling off, or hate crime laws passed, or close the, and I’m going to use my anger, my real, heartfelt anger to fuel me to get up at five o’clock in the morning to do Plan A, B and C; or I can be someone so angry that I never get to a strategy, I never get to Plan A, B and C. But then the police are not challenged, and the hate crime laws are not written, and  is still open.  So the question one has to ask one’s self—I tell young people all the time, and most of the  leadership in our chapters are younger than me—you have to make a choice at some point in your life: are you going to do something about what angers you, or do you want to just be angry?  Because I learned a long time ago that those in power don’t care that you’re angry, they care if you use that anger to do something about it.  You have a choice.  I used to like boxing.  My father was a boxer and I used to watching boxing matches all the time.  If you go into the ring just mad you’ll get knocked out.  Or you can go into the ring and have training, and have a fight plan, and use your natural anger to fuel your fight plan; it’s according to what you want to be.  But the one with the fight plan that uses his anger to drive the fight plan is the one who ends up champion.  The one without one just ends up angry and laying knocked out.  It’s your choice.  I’m not saying I came to that out of brilliance; I came to that out of trial and error.  I used to be angry with no plan.  Just recklessly angry.

'''DS: What would you do?
 * AS: Just mad, just react.  And achieve nothing.  You’ve got to say that life is about stated goals, benchmarks, and what you want to achieve at the end of life.  Because everybody comes to an end.  What was the purpose of your life and what did you achieve?  So if my goal was to build a social justice network, and to change things, at the end of life in the social justice arena, did I do that?  It won’t matter if I was angry or happy, it will matter if I have achieved that.  That’s what I learned from James Brown.  You got to decide what your purpose is, not others.  Much of the media criticism of me  assumes their goals and the impose them on me.  Well, those might not be my goals.  So they will say, “Well, Sharpton has not won a political office.”  But that might not be my goal!  Maybe I ran for political office to change the debate, or to raise the social justice question.

'''DS: Which you see today. Dennis Kucinich or Tom Tancredo, they’re not there because they think they are going to win; they are trying to frame the issues.
 * AS: Right.  And if they are there to frame the issue, then they are successful.  One of the things I learned from James Brown is don’t let others determine your success.  Your success is based upon your goals, not the goals they impose upon you.

Criticism: Sharpton is always there
'''DS: A lot of the criticism that is lodged at you is that you always seem to pop up around hot button issues, or where there is some race issue. My interview with you came up during my Thanksgiving dinner with my family, and I’d like that dinner to inform our discussion because it illustrated many of the typical perspectives about you. My brother-in-law made that point, that there you always are around the controversial race issue. I responded with, “Well, what was he saying? Was he wrong about what he said? Why do we focus on Sharpton and not the issue he is talking about?”
 * AS: Your answer is right, but let me give you something even deeper than that.  If you asked the average critic, “Where is he?” ,  Imus, whatever.  You know what they won’t recognize?  Not only was I there, but I created it into being an issue.  There was no Jena until we went into Jena.  There was nobody else fighting Imus.  The misconception is these these issues got hot and then I came in; no, I came in and I made them hot.  There was nobody in Jena; nobody heard of Jena until we went down there.  Nobody ever questioned Imus but us, which is why Imus came to our show.  The reason why this becomes important is because not only are you right, ‘Do you disagree with him,’ but do you begrudge him being in front of an issue that he helped create?  So who is supposed to be in front of it?  I create an issue and then somebody else is supposed to lead it?  Last Friday we had a huge 50,000 person march in Washington against the Justice Department .  We went out there organizing with our chapters, got 150 buses from around the country paid for.  Who is supposed to lead the march?  You got people saying, “There he is leading the march.”  Well, he organized it.  Who is supposed to lead the march?  And the thing that gets me is, you get blamed for stuff you did not do.  A lot of people think I led .  I never went to Duke; I never went to North Carolina.  Never ever.  They asked me to come, but I said unless I talk to the victim I’m not going.  So you get criticized for what you do organize and lead, and you get criticized for stuff you had nothing to do with, just because people assume you were there.  And it’s crazy!

'''DS: Nadine Strossen, the President of the ACLU, brought up in our interview that their critics intentionally distort their work to serve their own purposes. For instance, many people believe the ACLU works to keep religion out of the school, yet they have consistently fought for the right for religion to be in schools. She debated Falwell and Robertson on these issues, and they will still say that the ACLU is fighting to remove God from the public sphere.
 * AS: She’s right!  That’s not their position!

'''DS: When you come across people who intentionally misinform the debate in order to scuttle your goals, what do you do?
 * AS: The only thing you can do is straighten the record out, but you come to expect it.  The advantage I have is that I grew up in the movement and watched people from Reverend Jackson to James Brown.  James Brown as the dominant father in my life; Jackson as the dominant teacher, who had to deal with the same misconceptions and controversies.  When it came my time, I almost expected it because that is what they are going to do, which is to try and change the debate.  What you learn is you don’t let them change the premise.  Because if you start with the wrong premise, you arrive at the wrong conclusion.   I’ll give you an example.  A guy says to me the other day in an airport, “I admire you, but I’d like to see you on more than civil rights issues.”  I said, “Let me ask you a question:  what do I do?”  He said, “Well, you lead a civil rights organization.”  So what am I supposed to do?  That’s like getting on a plane and telling the pilot I’d like to see you do more than fly the plane.  That’s what I do—I’m a civil rights leader!  What is a civil rights leader supposed to do?

'''DS: That’s the same response Ingrid Newkirk gave in an interview when I told her people say she cares more about fighting for animals than for humans. She responded that’s what PETA does: give a voice to those who do not have one. She said that criticism is like telling a homeless shelter they care more about the homeless than people who live in mansions.
 * AS: That’s exactly right!  I tell staff here and all the other cities where we have offices, don’t complain when people come in here with problems because that’s what you do.  That’s like a nurse saying, “Why do sick people come here?”  Because you work in a doctor’s office!  Why do people who are in trouble go to a lawyer’s office?  Because that’s what lawyers do.  That’s what I do:  civil rights.  So in many ways, what they consider criticism is complimenting my job.  An activist’s job is to make public civil rights issues until there can be a climate for change.  So when people get angry at me for raising these issues and making them public, well, that’s my job!  That’s what I’m supposed to do.  If I could not get the public’s attention on an issue, then I’m not a good activist.

Tawana Brawley to Megan Williams
'''DS: Are you tired of hearing  always paired with your name?
 * AS: No.  You know what happens?  It has been so long—twenty years—that when a lot of people back up on that, others realize how ludicrous it is.  They say, “Wait a minute, you have to go back twenty years to criticize him?  And He believed in a girl that you don’t believe in?” So, twenty years later now and the same thing happened to .  Was that a hoax?  When you look at the span of my career, from  before Brawley to  now, if all you can do is go to one case twenty years ago, then most people would say that is a little shaky.  I mean, come on.  Because if I was a hoaxster, then why haven’t we seen other hoaxes in twenty years?  And why didn’t the jury say they thought it was a hoax?  The jury said they didn’t believe  should have been labeled, the same jury that hit us with defamation.  That jury said there was no conspiracy to lie, which is why they only awarded him $65,000 from me.  If they thought it was a hoax, I would have been indicted for conspiracy and I would have been charged with a whole lot more money.  In many ways, I learn to just sit back and laugh, because if you have to go back to 1987 in 2007, that means I have a pretty good record.

'''DS: How would 2007 Al Sharpton have handled the Tawana Brawley case differently than 1987 Al Sharpton?
 * AS: I probably wouldn’t have made it as personal in terms of personal attacks on the Attorney General, but I would still have fought the case.  I would have done the same case, I would have stood up the same way, and I do it the same way now.  When we are approached—phone rings every day here with cases—we are not the investigator.  We are there to make sure there is a fair investigation.  And I would have done the same thing then I do now.  Not long ago a writer said to me, “How can you believe a girl is apprehended by four white men with the  written on her and all of that?”  I told him, “Let me tell you a story I heard that sounds even worse.  I heard of a guy who was grabbed and brought to a police station and they stuck a pole up his behind, and no cop would stop them and turn them in.”  He said, “That’s ludicrous!”  And I said, “That’s, and it happened!”  I fought that case, and those cops went to jail.  So in my world, who decides what the most bizarre story in the world is?  We hear these every day!  He says, “I never thought about it like that.”  Megan Williams right now is Tawana Brawley.  What are we talking about?  I’ll give you another example.  Five young black kids were arrested and charged for raping a white female in Central Park.  I defended them.  Thirteen years later we find out that they did not do it.  The  cleared them.  One of them works for us now.  So how do you know?  Only by continuing to fight for what you believe in.

'''DS: You are saying that when you become involved you are fighting to ensure that there is a fair investigation into whatever has happened, and that sometimes you are paired with the fact that not everything turns out in favor of the person being investigated?
 * AS: That’s exactly right.  You get the downside, like the Brawley jury didn’t believe her.  I’ll give you one worse.  Amadou Diallou was killed, forty-one bullets.  The jury said they weren’t guilty.  He’s still dead.  So on paper was I wrong about Amadou Diallo?  He’s dead, forty-one bullets killed him, but the jury said that those cops were right, so when do we decide?  My comeback always is: I disagreed with the  grand jury on Brawley.  I believed there was enough evidence to go to trial.  Grand jury said there wasn’t.  Okay, fine.  Do I have a right to disagree with the grand jury?  Many Americans believe  was guilty.  A jury said he wasn’t.  So I have as much right to question a jury as they do.  Does it make somebody a racist?  No!  They just disagreed with the jury.  So did I.  I happened to not believe a fifteen year old girl could have made all that up and guess the names of the people who admitted they were together.  I just don’t believe that.  Now, what happened?  I don’t know.  But I don’t believe that.  So, we’ll just disagree.

Sharpton and the African-American media
DS:  recently wrote a relatively laudatory column about you in '. In it he said, "When Sharpton toppled Jesse Jackson from the top spot as black America's main man, the notoriety, and the hostility, that that title carries with it, insured that he'd take the heat for whatever went right or wrong when blacks took to the streets in protest." What do you think happened to Jesse Jackson’s place in the black community? Hutchison is a prominent black man saying you toppled Jackson.
 * AS: Well, that’s a hard thing for me to comment on.  When I was growing up Reverend Jackson was a hero to me and a mentor.  I’d rather not get into that.  I’ll let Earl and others give their opinions.  I’ll stay out of that.  That’s difficult for me to answer.

'DS: Clarence Page again in reference to this wrote, " culture punishes those who don't ',' to quote a popular inner-city T-shirt slogan, even when the victims are innocent neighbors. A lot of us black Americans would like to take back our streets. We could use a little more help from our leaders."
 * AS: We could use a little more help from Clarence Page, again.  When I had the campaign against these lyrics—I had the “It’s Not Snitching, It’s Saving” campaign—Clarence was totally silent.  We’ve taken that head on, and had rappers attack us.   said “Al Sharpton can suck my so-and-so.”   has a record out, and he's a friend of mine!  He says, “Don’t tell me Al Sharpton not to say ''!”  They don’t attack Clarence Page they attack me because I’m attacking them.  Just look at the rappers attacking me.  So somebody should ask Clarence Page why they are attacking me if I’m not out there fighting them.

'''DS: You are saying that black columnists,  whether it be Clarence Page or Juan Williams, who seem to have made their names by attacking a lot of the work done at the grass roots. How can you change that?
 * AS: I don’t think you can.  That's their role.  If you go back to the sixties it was  who used to attack Martin Luther King.  You have blacks who understand that one of the ways to get a job in the mainstream media is to attack black leaders.

'''DS: Such as Juan Williams?
 * AS: Oh,  who works at Fox?  Juan Williams works for  and wants to ask me about accountability?  I mean, really.  He works for Rupert Murdoch and wants to ask me about accountability.  I think he was mad because a Republican donated some money to the National Action Network.  And you work for Rupert Murdoch.  Because we are on  we should have gone to a rally for The Word Network.  It’s ridiculous.  Again, what do they do?  The main thing they write about is criticism of black leaders.  If you read their columns you understand what their job is.  "White leadership is never at fault.  Government is never at fault.  It's black leaders."  What's ironic is the ones they do praise — Bill Cosby does my radio show maybe once a month.  Real close with me.  They praise Cosby, but never talk about the fact that Cosby and I work together on these very issues.  And Cosby supports what I do.  How do they reconcile that?  Because they understand that part of their compact with the right wing is that they'll beat up on Al Sharpton, or Jackson, or whoever, because they are black.

Why the need for an Al Sharpton?
'''DS: At Thanksgiving we were talking about the different voices for different communities, and I said that there is no  "Al Sharpton"—the Cubans used to have, but nobody has taken his place—nor is there an Asian "Al Sharpton". With the black community it seems like Americans are always looking for the voice. Do you think that your visibility has been externally imposed?
 * AS: No, I disagree with that.  I’m glad you had that discussion.  Do you know why I disagree with you?  In the Latino community you don’t have an Al Sharpton, you have .  Every community does have an organization or institution.  So number one, that’s not true.  Second, in the black community—

'''DS: But there’s no one voice. It seems like the others never have a singular voice.
 * AS: Yeah, but that one voice is always the head of some group.  Believe me, if I could not prove that we could deliver the bodies to these protests, the press wouldn’t cover me.  The only reason the press covers me is we create the issue.  The press ignored Jena until we put 40,000 people down there.  So if we have the organizational muscle, they aren’t doing me a favor.  The white media didn’t create me, they covered me.  When I went to Howard Beach, there were hundreds out there and they threw bananas at us and all.  The press didn’t contact me and say, “We’ll tell you what, Sharpton, you go out there and we’ll cover you.”  No!  I created the drama like King did in Selma, Alabama.  So what they are really saying is, “Let’s be selective because if we don’t like Sharpton let’s not cover Sharpton because we want somebody else.”  Usually even the black critics that criticize charismatic leadership are blacks without  who can’t do it themselves.  We’ve always had charismatic leadership, whether it was Mandela in South Africa or King in the south.  The question is what you use the charismatic leadership for; what’s wrong with that?

'''DS: Shane Johnson is an African-American blogger who was protesting your Washington, D.C. Department of Justice march. , who is one of your critics within the African-American community, wrote a column about it. He wrote, "Why do we black folks get so much more agitated about occasional white-on-black insults than about the black-on-black assaults that constantly terrorize certain neighborhoods?"
 * AS: My answer is why doesn’t Clarence Page do something about it when we everyday deal with that.  That is dealt with every day and every way.  Not only have we dealt with black on black assaults, not only do we do crime rallies, not only do we denounce it, we’ve even been the ones to go as far as to march on black rappers about the N-word, misogyny and violence to women that a lot of them glorify.  Clarence Page and them don’t do that, we do.  My critics were totally silent when we were marching on the rappers, the records companies and all of that this summer.  But when I do a  march, they criticize.   Well, where were they when we were marching on some of these rappers who glorify violence?  That’s why they have no credibility in our community.  Because we are marching on the record companies that glorify violence; we are marching on black on black violence.   They are not.  They wait for us to do an issue that is race-based, and act like that’s all we did.  We spent half this year fighting lyrics in records, the glorification of violence, drugs in our community.  I’m the one who painted the crackhouses, saying get them out of our community.  Where was Clarence and them then?

'''DS: Is getting your message out that you do more than just race-based issues a challenge you have difficulty overcoming? That’s all that people hear and see you do.
 * AS: Well, that’s one of the challenges, but part of the problem is guys who are critics won’t tell the truth.  If you were to ask them, they know we’ve marched against record companies.  They won’t cover them, because they know—particularly a lot of black columnists—because that’s the way they can be heard: to be against whoever is out there.  They did it to Jesse before me, and they did it to King before him.  You know, one of the ways you can get covered if you are black in the mainstream media is to attack the guy that is up front.  Make him the boogeyman.  I accepted that going in.

Al Sharpton and Presidential Politics
'''DS: Recently a poll came out that showed sixty-one percent of the black Americans surveyed said values between poor and middle-class blacks are moving too far apart to be viewed as a common black experience. Only 41 percent expressed that view in a similar 1986 poll. Do you think the black experience is no longer defined by race, but by socio-economic status?
 * AS: No, I think it was always divided on socio-economic status.  I think that there is a growing socio-economic difference that brings the contrast more to light, but that all comes together around the question of civil rights.  There’s no difference.  There’s any number of polls that show that most blacks, no matter what their class, say that there is still bias in America.  Whether you are a kid in Jena from a poor family, or a college professor at Columbia with nooses hanging on your door, you still have a race problem.  You may have a difference in views about values, but both of you still feel there is bias at whatever class level you are at.  That is why they were shocked when I ran for President and the black elite—the  who own  and Earl Grey—were some of the biggest contributors to my campaign.  Because they said we still have to have somebody out there fighting race.  Let me give you the schizophrenia of the political animal.  When I ran for President, I won every black district in Washington D.C.  I then won the black vote in South Carolina, when I never was from the south.  But do you know what nobody ever talks about?  I’m the only black who ran for President who had to run against another black: Carol Mosley Braun.  Jesse never had to face a black;  never had to face a black.  Obama hasn’t had to face a black.  The real question is: why did Sharpton get so many more votes than Carol Mosley Braun, who on paper was a much better candidate?  Former U.S. Senator, former ambassador, and she never got anywhere near my vote.  It shows that blacks vote based on who they think supports their interests.  Now you are talking about Obama has to fight Hillary for the black vote; I had to fight Carol Mosley Braun for the black vote, and beat her everywhere.  I think that is the analysis they don’t want to give.  They’ll say Sharpton didn’t get the votes that Jesse got, but they never mention there was a black woman—the only black woman who ever served in the U.S. Senate—running against Sharpton!  They forget that now.

'''DS: What did you learn about national politics from your Presidential run?
 * AS: I’ll tell you, I will be completely candid with you.  I learned these guys are not that smart.  I expected them to be a lot smarter, a lot more difficult to debate, and I learned a lot of them only have the value system of win, win, win.  They don’t believe in anything.  Obviously I ran to put forth a political position and to make visible a constituency.  And obviously many of them didn’t; but I thought they had some core beliefs.  Most of them didn’t have core beliefs.

'''DS: Is there one moment that sticks out in your mind?
 * AS: Probably, but let me get back to that.  I also learned that once most Americans and I talked, that we didn’t disagree that much.  When I was campaigning in Iowa and New Hampshire—totally white communities—that the more we talked not only did they get more comfortable with me, I got more comfortable with them.  Because people really don’t disagree on fundamentals as much as the disagree on the stuff we’ve been programmed to disagree on with each other.

'''DS: The way it’s presented in the media.
 * AS: Correct.  People would say to me, “Now that I hear you, even if I disagree with you I don’t think you’re as bad as I thought.”  I would say, “Let me ask you a question: what was ‘bad as you thought’?”  And they couldn’t say.  They don’t know why they think you’re bad, they just know you’re supposed to be bad because the right wing tells them you’re bad.

'''DS: It seems the media—both liberal and conservative—has to follow a narrative.
 * AS: Exactly.  So even my worse criticism—Brawley—tell me what is wrong with a civil rights leader believing a 15 year old girl who came to him.  I didn’t tell her the story, she told me.  What was wrong about that?  “I guess nothing.  Did you know she was lying?”  A jury didn’t know.  She said that I didn’t know what her story was.  So in your worse scenario, the lack of discourse is what separates most Americans.  I learned that more than anything in the campaign.  When I would meet with a lot of the handlers and DNC officials about the campaign, and everything was geared toward polling and focus groups, and not core beliefs, that’s when I got this thing that took me, as one who is a true believer—I mean, I’ve been prosecuted, stabbed, 9 days in jail in  for what I believe, jail twenty other times—at the end of the day people have to say I believe in what I do.  I don’t know if there are a lot of people in national politics that have core beliefs that they would go to jail for, or even be willing to die for.  I just don’t feel that way about those people.  Ultimately, I only respect people who are willing to put it all on the line.

'''DS: Was there a moment that sticks out in your mind during the campaign with anyone in particular?
 * AS: Not really.

'''DS: What about during the debates?
 * AS: You could see people change.  Remember when I ran in 2004, and when the debates started in 2003, most of the people on the stage, including Kerry and Edwards, were pro-war.  I was the first one—even  before —who came out against it.  Then Dean came out and joined the race later.  I saw them go from, “We got to fight terrorism, we got to go to Iraq,” almost to my position in a matter of four or five months, which I considered questionable.  It also validated why you need public pressure.  I remember I went to the first huge anti-war march in Washington, the  march.  I was the first Presidential candidate that would go.

On Barack Obama
'''DS: Who are you supporting for President?
 * AS: No one yet.  The question is, who is going to support a strong social justice agenda?  When I sit and look at the Democratic debates, with all these hangmen nooses, and all these hate crimes, and they don’t even bring it up, how can I support them when they’re not supporting us?  If I was on that stage it would be on the agenda.

'''DS: The Post reported back in April that you have a conflict with Obama. What do you think is behind that story?
 * AS: I think it’s trying to get a double shot.  Hurt him with people that like me; hurt me with people that like him.  Say that Sharpton has a problem with him so the Obama people say, "Oh, why is Al messing with Obama?”  The people that are in the debates, where he has to contest with Hillary, "Oh, you have a problem with Al Sharpton."  I don’t have a problem with Obama.  I talk to Obama, I talk to Hillary, I talk to John Edwards.  I have a problem that none of them are forcefully raising the social justice agenda.  Why?  That’s what I do.  I’m a social justice leader.  That’s what I do.  And I think if you went to a union leader, he’d say, “I like their issues on this, but what about labor?” and I think if you went to a woman leader, “What about gender divided?”  Why do people expect me not to be concerned about civil rights?  That’s what I do.

'''DS: Why do you think Obama is not dominating the black vote?
 * AS: I don’t know.  I think one, they don’t know him as well.  They are just learning him.  I think he’ll do alright, but I think the strategic mistake his handlers made—I don’t think it was him—is they sold him as beyond race.  The antithesis to the civil rights guys.  The problem with that is the blacks say, “Okay, you aren’t standing up for us, then fine.”  So you can’t come back later and say he’s the black candidate when he said no he’s not.   A lady at The New York Times called to do a story and I made her change the whole thing.  She said, “I want to do a story on Obama and the civil rights generation and the conflict.”  I said, “You’ve got a problem.  Obama and I are the same generation.  We are only six years apart.  How do you count generations?”  She said she hadn’t thought about that.  You could do that with Jesse, but Obama is 46 and I’m 53; that’s not a different generation.  Why don’t you talk about that every generation has had blacks on the inside and blacks on the outside.   was in the Senate like Obama when King was alive.  Ed Brooke was elected and sitting in the Senate when King was alive, and he was a Republican from Massachusetts.  Then we had, then we had Obama.   was chairman of the party when Jesse Jackson was the outsider.  This new thing is that you guys don’t do research.  There’s always been blacks inside the system and blacks outside.  That’s not generational, that’s functional.

The Iraq War
'''DS: Do you think there should be ?
 * AS: I don’t know.  I don’t know.  That’s debatable to me.

'''DS: Do you consider our military a volunteer army?
 * AS: Yeah.  I think that a —I’m against drafts, even when  came out with it.  Even understanding the reasoning, to make rich as well as poor go, I just think the rich will find a way to get around it and there will still be a disproportionate amount of poor.

'''DS: Which you saw in Vietnam, and many national leaders now found ways not to go.
 * AS: Exactly right.  I was in high school at the time of the, there was a draft, and the rich kids didn’t go.  They found a way around it.

'''DS: How has the war affected you?
 * AS: I think it has affected me in that I have seen and actually preached at soldiers’ funerals.  I’ve seen the families suffer for absolutely no reason.  There never was Weapons of Mass Destruction, there never was eminent danger, so I have seen it up close and personal in terms of families losing their sons.  I’ve also seen resources that we could have used to provide training and jobs in this country just sent over there arbitrarily.  I also watched when  happened the way people who were relocated around the country couldn’t vote at home, but Iraqis could vote from America in the elections in Iraq.  I think it brought out the glaring contradictions of American democracy as practiced by people like the Bush administration.

'''DS: Are you optimistic for the future?
 * AS: Absolutely.  There is no doubt in my mind as I sit here today that the world will be better, America will be better, and that those like us—no matter how controversial—will be redeemed in history.  There is no doubt in my mind.  Whether we live to see it physically or not, I have no doubt in my mind.

Sharpton as a symbol
'''DS: I interviewed documentary filmmaker Kira Nerusskaya, who is one of the leading voices in the fat acceptance movement. She is what she calls a “BBW”. A. Your name came up in that interview and she called you "Reverend " and mentioned that fat people don’t have their own "Al Sharpton", someone they can turn to when they are being hassled at work because they are a drain on their insurance, or when fat people are discriminated against or harassed. When you hear that you have become a symbol that transcends your community, what do you think?
 * AS: I thought you were going to say she is disappointed that I’m not as fat as I used to be.  On one level I think it is flattering.  It is something you never think about when you jump into this.  Again, I joined the movement way before I was old enough to understand all of that—

'''DS: When you were ten, when you were preaching—
 * AS: Yeah, exactly.  People say now I’m living by ambition or whatever else they accuse me of, but what was I living by when I was ten years old?  Twelve years old when I joined Breadbasket.  It’s also frightening because it makes you all the more a target for every critic.  There’s not a month that goes by that we don’t have a serious death threat.  Every criminal justice guy is trying to topple you.  So you become a target as much as it is flattering, so I always remember the upside and the downside of it.

'''DS: It’s interesting that you have become that to other people.
 * AS: It is, but I’ll tell you what else is interesting that she said—and I don’t know if she intended to say it this way or not—when she said I’m "Reverend 9-1-1".  What a lot of people don’t understand, particularly in the white community, is I’m projected as an ambulance chaser.  But I’m more the ambulance.  People call me because they know I will come.  If nothing else you write, I have never fought a case where they didn’t ask me to come.  People have this picture like I’m sitting up in bed at night with a walkie-talkie.  “You hear anything?  Oh, let’s run!  It’s Virginia today!”  People call us.  Jena all the way to Florida all the way to, all the way to .  Every victim calls us.  On my syndicated radio show now if we get a case I make the victim get on and say, “Now, you asked me to get involved in this?”  That’s what I did with Jena.  Now nobody remembers because nobody knew what Jena was then.  We respond to a person coming in, which is why it’s absurd when black conservatives, “Who put Sharpton in charge?”  The victim!  Who put me in charge of Jena?  The people involved with Jena asked me to come.  What gives you the right to tell people not to have who they want to represent them.  Could you imagine?  I’m leading the march on , asked to come in by the parents of the kid in jail, and they’re going to sit on MSNBC that night and ask, “Well, why is Al Sharpton leading it?”  Because the parents of the kid asked me to lead it!  Duh!  So at least let’s be straight-up about it.

'''DS: Do you think the criticism is more because you are successful for bringing attention to it?
 * AS: If I was not able to bring public attention, they would care less.  And let’s face it: some of them are very cynical and know they can get a lot of play criticizing me.  I was talking about it at the rally this morning—we have rallies here every Saturday.  You have one guy, I can’t think of, a sportswriter from  who made a career out of criticizing me about Imus.  He did every talk show.  “Sharpton’s wrong!”  Nobody ever said, “Wait a minute, you a sportswriter, what are you speaking for?  What are you talking about it?”  It’s ludicrous.

'''DS: Why do you think that happens?
 * AS: Because they know that there is a market for it.  They know they can get air time for it.

'''DS: Did you ever do a  test to see if you were related to ?
 * AS: No, I just accepted the documents; I never did the DNA.

'''DS: Do you keep in contact with ?
 * AS: I only met her one time.  Because again, I don’t know that we are related.  I know that my great-grandfather was a slave of the Thurmonds, I don’t know that there was any blood.  When they came and told me I went down to South Carolina to, and visited the cemetery.  The cemetery at the First Baptist Church of Edgefield is all Sharptons—of course the white Sharptons—and Thurmonds.  While I was there, a man came up and said, “You know, the plantation that your great-grandfather worked on is still intact.  A doctor bought it and he didn’t change anything.  He told me if you’d like to see it we can go over there.”  It’s on Sharpton Road in Edgefield.  [Sharpton shows Shankbone the photos of him at the plantation].  I look at it to remind me of how far we’ve come. [Sharpton shows Shankbone photos of civil rights leaders and his family].  This is the last time James Brown was on stage at the , to do my fiftieth birthday in 2004.

'''DS: Did you ever think you’d reach fifty?
 * AS: No.  I hate to admit it.  I always thought I would probably get killed before now.  After I got stabbed in 1991 I was sure that if I got to forty, I would never make it to fifty.  Now I’m fifty-three, which is probably why I work as hard as I do.  I work 17, 18 hour days.  Rachel [Noerdlinger, his assistant] will tell you 20, but she’s lying because she feels I overwork.  I feel every day I live is a day I never expected to live, so I try to do everything I can.  I think that part of the problem with a lot of civil rights leaders is that this is the first generation that actually lived to be gray.  What do gray civil rights leaders do?  Because in the era before us, they were all dead by now.

'''DS: Who are some up-and-coming civil rights leaders under thirty?
 * AS: Some are in my organization.  You’ve got Tamika Mallory, who heads the Decency Initiative here in New York.  You’ve got Mark Coleman in .  You have Jerry Moffet in Phoenix.  I could name you fifteen to twenty in various degrees who have a lot of potential.  Who will become national?  I have no idea.  I tend to work with all of them.  We have thirty-three chapters, offices in seven cities, and 90% of them are under forty years old.  Most of the people who marched with us in Jena and Washington were under forty years old.  There’s a resurgence of activism among young people, and I think a lot of it is they went through this era of blacks making it as CEOs and blacks making it in management, and now that era is over.   is gone soon; Obama is not dominating the black vote.  So a lot of these people are saying that it’s not happening.  They are going back to that we have to struggle as a unit.

'DS: At Thanksgiving my brother-in-law’s brother made the point that we in white America don’t remember history, and that when we come across people who do'' remember history and we are always shocked. “Why don’t you get over it and move on?” But that doesn’t take into account that there is a long history of racial problems that have set people behind in the race by half a mile, and suddenly it’s supposed to be, “You’re equal, it’s a fair race now.”
 * AS: “Get over it!”  Yeah.  People are set back half a mile because they were given a disadvantage, not because they fell a half a mile.  Then you tell us to "catch up" and forget that the race was unfair in the beginning.  You’re right.

'''DS: One sees this problem with history with the  in the right wing. They have an entirely different perspective on history. They don’t view and —who were secular—as our founding fathers. When they talk about America’s founding fathers they mean and the.
 * AS: I think you have to be determined to not allow people to dismiss history.  You have to use every forum to put history into perspective.  People have a reason they want you to forget history, because history does not back up their point.  One of the things  and I talked about is that his father died one of the most controversial figures in the history of America, but you would think now forty years later he was revered by white America.  He wasn’t!  The New York Times would write editorials about him telling him to keep his nose out of the Vietnam business.  “Who do you think you are?”  When he died—that’s when I joined the movement—we had to fight to get him a national holiday.  But today you read stories that guys like us aren’t Dr. King.  Well, in Dr. King’s time they didn’t have him as Dr. King, but that’s the benefit of distorting history.  If you can erase history, erase why there are racial gaps across the board—health care, education, income—if you can erase how that all started, then you can make guys like me look extreme.  But if you look at history and how we got here, we’re really very reasonable to say some of the things we have said.

'DS: Then the focus is on gangsta culture and instead of looking at how that came about, it is talked about as if it is a phenomenon that just happened''?
 * AS: Nobody is looking at that, and the fact that if you didn’t have gangsta culture, we’d still be in the back of the bus.  Should we have stronger family ties?  Of course.  Should we stress education?  Of course!  Should we stress responsibility?  Of course!  But people who had self-contained families that were very responsible still had to sit in the back of the bus and couldn’t check into a hotel.  Let’s not act like gangsta is what caused racial inequity in our society.  It’s like saying you’ve got cancer, but you’ve also got a head cold, so the reason you’ve got cancer is you’ve got a head cold.  No, you have cancer and a head cold.  You take  for the head cold, but you’ve still got to deal with the cancer.  What they are trying to act like is taking head cold medicine is going to solve cancer.  It’s a bunch of crap!  If every black in America had strongly family ties, and there were no out-of-wedlock births, which I strongly advocate and preach, it still wouldn’t solve the racial inequality in the social fabric.  Let’s be honest about that.

Blacks and whites and talking about race
'''DS: At the end of the Thanksgiving discussion, I said that if a black person was sitting at the table with us, we would never have had the entire conversation. We talked about that. Do you think there is a nervousness amongst the races to engage each other?
 * AS: A lot of the nervousness is that white America is uncomfortable with having to deal with the guilt and history of racism, and they certainly don’t want to admit it is still here, and black America in large part has for so long has had to try and act like it's not there to get along.  It’s almost like our silence will get us access so that we don’t offend you.  And those of us that are offensive have to then carry the burden of trying to push the envelope.  That’s why Bill Tatum, who publishes the , said if we didn’t have a guy like Al Sharpton we’d have to invent one.  Because every generation has to have somebody who pushes the envelope.  We just do.

'''DS: I think it was  who used to talk about the problem is the races too afraid to talk to each other about race.
 * AS: I think Lani Guinier did talk about that.  You have to not only have blacks, but you have to have whites and white leadership that want to have that dialogue.  Most of them don’t want to have it.  We have to create that dialogue and hopefully some of the things we are doing creates the climate for that dialogue.  What I have found is that many people in America, particularly the white people, don’t really want peace, they want quiet.  “Just shut up and don’t talk about it.  Fine, there may be a problem, but let’s not talk about it.”   That’s not peace, that’s quiet.  You’ll never have peace until you have real dialogue and look at the difference between the life of a white and life of a non-white in this country, and how we close the gap.  That’s how you get peace.  So people don’t want racial justice; they want racial quiet.  But racial quiet in the absence of racial justice is to allow for things to go forward unfairly.  In the long wrong, that leads to explosions because people hold it in as long as they can and then they explode.  The way to stop the explosions is to deal with the problem.

'''DS: Would you say what sums up the problem with dialogue as you see it is that white people are too afraid to offend black people by asking questions about their perceptions, but that black people become too offended by white people’s ignorance?
 * AS: I think that’s a fair statement.  I think that’s a very fair statement.  I wish I had said it.  That hit it right on the head.  Really.

, and
'''DS: When you think about Imus, Michael Richards and Duane Chapman, it’s starting to seem almost like a rehearsed play. They have these racist explosions, and then they come to you seeking absolution. How do you feel about playing this?
 * AS: That’s a great question, because if you name Don Imus, Richards, Bounty Hunter, they all three came, and none of them got absolution from me.  The critics say, “Why do they go to Al Sharpton for absolution?”  What nobody ever asks is, “What did Sharpton do?”  I made Imus go on my radio show and told him he should be fired.  I never talked to the "Bounty man".  And I told Michael Richards I’m not meeting with him.  So, despite what they designed to happen with me, I never cooperated with the design.  Imus only went on my show thinking if he did he would get past it; I used it for the basis to get him fired.  He got everything but absolution.  Why do they come?  Because of my visibility.  Right now, National Action Network is the only civil rights organization in the country that can put tens of thousands of people in the street.  I think we proved that if nothing else this year from Sean Bell to Jena to Washington.  He thought if he did he would get past it; I used it for the basis to get him fired.  You go where you think if you can get this group not to fight me, you get a pass.  If somebody is accused of, they go to the .  Does that make  the "President of the Jews"?  No!  That’s what ADL does.  It’s insulting to us.  They say, “Al Sharpton is not the President of Black America.”  No, I’m like ADL is in the Jewish community.  That’s what he does.  If anybody is going to jump on this, it’s him, so let me go to him.  That doesn’t mean he’s in charge of all blacks.  It means if it’s a civil rights violation—that’s what they have to do—he’s been the guy up front.  It’s very simple.  In gay communities you have the .  With women, you’ve got .  In the Jewish community, you’ve got ADL.  Why wouldn’t you have a National Action Network in the black community?  But if sanity is that NOW can have , and the Jewish community can have Abe Foxman, and the gay community can have Human Rights group, but the black community can’t have an "Al Sharpton", that’s absurd!

'''DS: One of the issues that came up in reference to that at Thanksgiving was. My brother-in-law brought up the and said it was political correctness. His brother said that there is a big difference between calling black girls playing basketball  versus asking a black person why their families are in trouble.
 * AS: Big difference.  Big difference.

'''DS: But those get equated as being politically incorrect.
 * AS: I think you’re right.  They equate it, and it’s wrong.  The reason I demanded Imus be fired was because he had a record of making these kinds of derogatory statements.  It’s clear that ‘nappy-headed’ was a racist term.  That’s not questioning social maladies in the community.  What is the social malady or irresponsibility about ‘nappy-headed’?  ‘Ho’ is not only racist, it's misogynist.  People who tried to put that over as he just wasn’t politically correct are ridiculous.  That’s why if I or anybody else said a racist term against anybody else.  That’s not politically incorrect; that’s bias.  And all of us have made mistakes with language, but you pay for it.  Which is why I don’t object to him getting a job again, but he had to lose that job because he had consistently violated that job.

'''DS: Are you okay that Don Imus is going back on the air?
 * AS: Well, we’ll monitor him; I’m not saying I’m going to throw a banquet for him and say welcome home.  He has the right to make a living, but because he has such a consistent pattern with this we are going to monitor him to make sure he doesn’t do it again.

'''DS: Do you work with the Hip Hop Action Network?
 * AS: On some issues.  They disagree with me at first when I came out hard on the N-word and all, but then they moderated their view.  On some things we work together.

'''DS: How did they disagree with you?
 * AS: When I first came out and said the N-word, the, should be stopped.   came out and said we can’t censor artists.  Then he got such a backlash he said, “We got it to be maybe voluntary, or something.”  Russell kind of slid backwards on that one.  My thing is I’m against the use of the word, and I’ve been against it for a long time.  Even in my book, Al on America I wrote a whole chapter on the hip hop generation and how to stop that.  On top of it, all of us have used it; I’ve even stopped using it privately, because it’s wrong.  I think the thing that really drove it home to me was the kid who got beat up in Howards Beach last year, and Fat Nick—the white that beat him up saying no niggers in the neighborhood—his defense in court was that he was using a hip hop term.  It’s ridiculous, absolutely ridiculous.  We can’t be the only ones in America in which there is no hate term.

'''DS: If you could choose how you die, how would it be?
 * AS: I would probably choose doing something active.  I would either be leading a march or preaching a sermon.  I don’t want to die old and incapacitated.  I’d rather die in the firing line.

'''DS: What do you think is the greatest threat to humanity?
 * AS: Our ignoring nature.  Our ignoring the signs of nature.

'''DS: Global warming?
 * AS: Global warming would be at the top of the list.  Al Gore ended up being right.  I think our ignoring nature, global warming, and then our ignoring the need for one standard of human rights all over the world.  This second.  But first nature, because we won’t be here if we don’t start taking nature seriously.  Like global warming and ecology and whatever we are doing with the environment.  Second is how we deal with human rights standard all over the world.

'''DS: Are there any national politicians you look up to as leaders?
 * AS: I respect Dennis Kucinich.  I respect  in Minnesota.  Those are the two that come to mind right away.  I’m far more progressive than most, but I really respect both of them.

'''DS: Do you think  has done a good job with ?
 * AS: I think Joel Klein has done better, than I thought he would.  I’m not sure I’m into the mayor controlling the system.  It’s funny, Joel has a sense of grass roots than one would think.  I think he has done better than I would have given him credit for.  I didn’t have a lot of hope for him.  He has defied my low expectation.


text:
Talk:ETA fighters kill Spanish guard in southern France

Some work needed due to copy-vio
Almost all sentences are word-for-word copies of the three English sources listed. Needs to be re-written. --Jcart1534 20:37, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

 * What do you think now? ;)

 * Much better! I am just going to edit it and it should be good to go. Cheers, --Jcart1534 22:10, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Unsourced
I could not find information in any of the sources listed, including the Spanish ones, to support the following claim: "This incident comes a day after more than 50 basques (journalists, writers, ecologists, teachers, lawyers and other profesionals) were imprisoned by the Spanish police accused of supporting ETA's independentist ideas." Maybe I missed it? --Jcart1534 20:37, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

 * The imprisonment of 50 basques accused of support ETA's ideology has been widely recorded by the Spanish and Basque media, but no by the international ones (for example, in the newspaper El Pais http://www.elpais.com/articulo/espana/Audiencia/impone/duras/condenas/38/52/procesados/caso/Ekin/elpepunac/20071201elpepinac_2/Tes and in the Basque Gara http://www.gara.net/azkenak/12/51251/es/Continuan-detenciones-procesados-sumario-18-98). Someone can think that this has nothing to do with the shooting, so perhaps we should remove this paragraph.

 * Let's keep it. It is relevant enough. I was just concerned because I couldn't find it in the sources currently in the article. We can add the elpais.com source to the article. Cheers, --Jcart1534 21:21, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I added the GARA source instead, as it was more detailed. Jcart1534 21:43, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/


text:
User talk:83.38.183.72

, welcome to Wikinews! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

Our key policies - if you read anything, read these! Here a few pointers to help you get to know Wikinews: There are always things to do on Wikinews:
 * Neutral point of view - tell every side to a story in a fair and balanced way
 * Cite sources - everything in a Wikinews article must be sourced
 * Introduction - overview of the site
 * Writing an article - how to write and publish a complete article
 * Content guide - what's suitable for Wikinews
 * Style guide - how articles should look before publishing
 * Contents - the contents page.
 * Existing articles need expanding and checking for spelling and mistakes
 * The front page lead articles often need updating
 * Developing stories need finishing and publishing
 * Discussions need your input
 * Audio Wikinews could always use more contributors
 * And of course, stories need writing!

First off, we really appreciate your contribution.

But sometimes users submit an article from somewhere else, not realizing that Wikinews cannot keep copy-and-paste versions of articles which are published elsewhere under a restrictive copyright. An article created in this way is a copyright violation, and Wikinews policy is to erase these even if they are excellent article ideas.

I think we can rework the ETA article so that the issues are resolved. Please check the article's Talk page for more information and to discuss the concerns. Cheers, --Jcart1534 20:55, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Nice work on ETA fighters kill Spanish guard in southern France
The changes you made were excellent. I hope you will contribute more articles to Wikinews. Cheers, --Jcart1534 22:43, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

title: User talk:83.38.183.72


text:
Venezuela to vote over constitutional reform on Sunday

December 1, 2007

This Sunday Venezuelans will decide whether a series of constitutional reforms should be approved or not; among these reforms, one issue which has received widespread media attention is that the new constitution will allow presidents to be re-elected without term limits.

The amendments—which will affect 69 of the 350 articles—have already been passed by the Venezuelan National Assembly (Asamblea Nacional de Venezuela). Now the referendum will take place on Sunday, being the last step required before the reform can come into effect.

According to Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez, the constitutional reform is needed to complete the country's transition to a "socialist republic". The 1999 Constitution had already increased the presidential term of office from five to six years, with the possibility of re-election. The previous constitution did not allow re-election.

Other disputed aspects are the autonomy of the Central Bank and reforms known as the "new geometry of power"; the opposition has argued that the reform is an attempt of granting even more power to Chávez. The President has argued that the reform is, on the contrary, a new "equation" to grant more power to the people.


text:
Wikinews:2007/December

December 31
de:Wikinews:Archiv/Hauptseite/2007/12 es:Wikinoticias:Archivo/2007/12 fr:Wikinews:2007/décembre it:Wikinotizie:2007/dicembre ja:ウィキニュース:2007年/12月 fi:Wikiuutiset:2007/Joulukuu zh:Wikinews:2007年/12月

title: Wikinews:2007/December


text:
Five tourists die in car crash in South African park

December 1, 2007

Five tourists including a child, have been killed in a car accident in Kruger National Park in South Africa. Four of the tourists were from Austria and one was from Germany. The driver survived the crash with minor injuries.

On Thursday November 29, the tourists were traveling in a Mercedes-Benz 4x4, near a gate to the park when the driver "miscalculated" the turn onto a bridge crossing the Letaba river, causing the car to plunge over the edge, flip over and fall into the river below with the roof in the river's water.

No names have been released as authorities are attempting to contact the family members of those killed. It is not known if the driver will be charged.


text:
Comments:Daredevil Evel Knievel dies at age 69

Evel Knivel page has been vandalized...
Anyone else get an "interesting" picture when you go onto his page?

Wanted to report it but it's locked.

Comments from feedback form - "awwwwww"
awwwwww —68.12.235.214 (talk) 06:10, 11 October 2011 (UTC)


text: Comments:Minnesota oil pipeline explosion and fire kills two


text:
Wikinews:CommonsTicker/20071202

2 December

title: Wikinews:CommonsTicker/20071202


text:
User talk:69.251.223.216

Sorry for removing your Furonda question; I like the newer change. TheCustomOfLife 02:26, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Also, Diana has no questions, if you can think of any for her. I will write some if nobody asks but I thought it'd be nice if she got fan questions too. TheCustomOfLife 02:26, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

title: User talk:69.251.223.216


title: File:2December2007.pdf


title: File:2December2007.sxw


text:
User talk:70.241.15.80

Spam
Hi, please do not place any kind of on our website - it will be  so no-one will ever see it. If you do want to contribute to Wikinews, see the introduction. Bawolff ☺☻ 07:07, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

title: User talk:70.241.15.80


text:
User talk:86.109.37.6

Please only create news articles on wikinews. See WN:NOT for more details. Bawolff ☺☻ 07:08, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Welcome
, welcome to Wikinews! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

Our key policies - if you read anything, read these! Here a few pointers to help you get to know Wikinews: There are always things to do on Wikinews: By the way, you can sign your name on Talk pages using four tildes ( ~~~~ ), which produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, you can ask them at the water cooler or to anyone on the Welcommittee, or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! Bawolff ☺☻ 07:08, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Neutral point of view - tell every side to a story in a fair and balanced way
 * Cite sources - everything in a Wikinews article must be sourced
 * Introduction - overview of the site
 * Writing an article - how to write and publish a complete article
 * Content guide - what's suitable for Wikinews
 * Style guide - how articles should look before publishing
 * Contents - the contents page.
 * Existing articles need expanding and checking for spelling and mistakes
 * The front page lead articles often need updating
 * Developing stories need finishing and publishing
 * Discussions need your input
 * Audio Wikinews could always use more contributors
 * And of course, stories need writing!

title: User talk:86.109.37.6


text:
MediaWiki:Deletereason-dropdown

 * Speedy deletions
 * Advertising or spam
 * Abandoned article – two day warning
 * Disassociated talk or comments page
 * Comments page of unpublished article
 * Redirect to a non-existent page
 * Wikinews is not Wikipedia – see What Wikinews is not
 * Patent nonsense
 * Test page
 * Pure vandalism
 * Disruptive trolling
 * No context; not news
 * Author request
 * Make room for page move or merge
 * Obvious hoax
 * Previously deleted
 * Foreign language, not news
 * Blatant copyright violation
 * Unused expired prepared story – after five days
 * Empty category
 * Optional redirect from pre-publish rename

 * Formal deletions
 * Copyright violation – one day warning
 * Abandoned article – two day warning
 * Minimal information – three day warning
 * Press release – three day warning
 * Unsourced prepared story – ten day warning
 * Deletion request

 * Other
 * Userspace deletion (owner's request)

title: MediaWiki:Deletereason-dropdown


text:
Draw results for UEFA Euro 2008 announced

December 2, 2007

The draw for UEFA Euro 2008 was held today in Lucerne, Switzerland. The tournament will be held in Austria and Switzerland, beginning on 7 June 2008.

Austria and Poland, both making their debuts in the European Championships, were drawn against Germany and Croatia in Group B. Co-hosts Switzerland will open the tournament with their match against the Czech Republic in Group A, which also includes Portugal and Turkey.

World Champions Italy will play France in a repeat of the 2006 FIFA World Cup Final while the Netherlands and Romania join them in Group C. Greece, the defending champions, were drawn against Sweden, Spain and Russia in Group D.

Italy and France had already played each other in the qualifying rounds, as did Netherlands and Romania, also in Group C, and Sweden and Spain in Group D.


text:
User talk:67.190.208.55

Welcome
, welcome to Wikinews! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

Our key policies - if you read anything, read these! Here a few pointers to help you get to know Wikinews: There are always things to do on Wikinews: By the way, you can sign your name on Talk pages using four tildes ( ~~~~ ), which produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, you can ask them at the water cooler or to anyone on the Welcommittee, or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome!–Doldrums(talk) 14:45, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Neutral point of view - tell every side to a story in a fair and balanced way
 * Cite sources - everything in a Wikinews article must be sourced
 * Introduction - overview of the site
 * Writing an article - how to write and publish a complete article
 * Content guide - what's suitable for Wikinews
 * Style guide - how articles should look before publishing
 * Contents - the contents page.
 * Existing articles need expanding and checking for spelling and mistakes
 * The front page lead articles often need updating
 * Developing stories need finishing and publishing
 * Discussions need your input
 * Audio Wikinews could always use more contributors
 * And of course, stories need writing!

I noticed you added new content to the article, The Onion: An interview with 'America's Finest News Source', which is more than 24 hours old. Thanks for taking an active role in improving the content on this site. People like you who take an active role make Wikinews better for all of us — readers and writers alike.

One thing to note, though, is that Wikinews articles are not works in progress. Articles are considered historical documents reflecting the knowledge and understanding of the event at the time of publishing. Once published for more than a day or so, they should not be continually updated or modified, except to fix minor style issues (eg. spelling mistakes).

To report on new developments in an ongoing story, you can create a new article instead of just adding content to an already published, out of date article. That way your work will be seen by more people since readers tend not to revisit old news articles looking for updates.

If a published article contains a factual error, please bring it to our attention at WN:ALERT, so that a Correction notice can be added to the article, which is otherwise left unchanged.

Again, thanks for helping improve this site.–Doldrums(talk) 14:45, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

title: User talk:67.190.208.55


text:
Russians vote in parliamentary election

December 2, 2007

Voters across Russia are choosing a new parliament in an election nearly certain to be won by President Vladimir Putin's party.

Polls opened in Moscow and other western cities Sunday, hours after voting began in frigid weather in Russia's far east.

More than 100 million people are eligible to vote for legislators in the 450-seat State Duma — the lower house of parliament.

The vote ends Sunday evening at 18:00, when polls close in the Baltic exclave of , the farthest west of Russia's 11.

Mr. Putin cast his own vote in Moscow Sunday, then encouraged voters to choose candidates they can trust.

After opposition leader cast his vote, he accused the ruling party of, in his words, "not just rigging the vote, but raping the whole electoral system."

The former chess champion was freed Thursday after completing a five-day jail sentence imposed on him and others who took part in an anti-Putin demonstration in Moscow.

In an interview broadcast on German radio Sunday, Chancellor Angela Merkel criticized the elections, noting the limited number of international observers.

A Russian state-run news agency,, quotes the elections commission chairman saying 299 foreign observers have been accredited so far, and the number will increase during the day.

Opposition leaders accuse the of stifling debate during the campaign leading up to the elections through pressure tactics and media controls.

The prohibits Mr. Putin from running for a third consecutive term as president in March. His name is at the head of United Russia's candidate list, indicating he might become prime minister in the next government, retaining much of his power.

title: Russians vote in parliamentary election


text:
Taiwanese government supports IT industry by participating in 2007 Taipei IT Month

December 2, 2007 2007 Informonth (IT Month), the annual exhibition for IT & 3C industries every winter in Taiwan, started in Taipei on December 1st and will run until December 9th in the Taipei World Trade Center (TWTC). Government officials, such as President of the Republic of China Shui-bian Chen, Premier of the Republic of China Chun-hsiung Chang, Commissioner of Council for Cultural Affairs Chin-chu Weng, Minister of Economic Affairs Steve Ruey-long Chen, Minister of Education Cheng-sheng Du, and Minister of Overseas Compatriot Affairs Commission Fu-mei Chang participated and visited this show to support the IT industry in Taiwan.

Due to several conflicts between political factions, the Pan-Green and Pan-Blue Coalitions, Taipei Computer Association, the organizer of IT Month, changed their plan to hold the Opening Ceremony at the second floor of the TWTC.

Not only did President Shui-bian Chen praise the progression of the IT and Networking industries in Taiwan, but Chun-hsiung Chang also replied to some comments on "Looking Down Taiwan" by a candidate of 2008 Taiwan Presidential Elections Ying-jeou Ma and confidently said, "Since the IT Month can showcase the achievements on the IT and Networking industry, why can Ma deliberately vilify those industries for his votes?" And before the executives left the TWTC, Cheng-sheng Du answered, "Obey the laws" to the media as they asked about the recent issue of "Gate of Great Centrality and Perfect Uprightness".

It wasn't just politicians that attended, however. The Research, Development and Evaluation Commission, Ministry of Economic Affairs, Council of Agriculture, Ministry of Education, Environmental Protection Administration, Ministry of Transportation and Communications, Taipei City Government, National Science Council, National Palace Museum, and National Taiwan University Hospital all participated in the show to showcase their industry solutions and milestones of IT and networking industries.


text:
World AIDS Day events held around the globe

December 2, 2007

The 20th annual World AIDS Day was December 1, 2007. The theme selected by the World AIDS Campaign is "Stop AIDS: Keep the Promise" as it will be through 2010. The day was marked by thousands of events around the world.

"It is now time for bold leadership at all levels in order to turn the tide of HIV," said Felicita Hikuam, Global Programmes Manager, World AIDS Campaign. An estimated 33.2 million people around the world—one in every 200—are living with HIV, and approximately 6,800 people are infected with HIV and 5,700 people die of AIDS-related illnesses every day.

"The trend is encouraging but still for every person receiving treatment four others are newly infected," said Nelson Mandela, speaking at a concert in Johannesburg, South Africa. "If we are to stop the Aids epidemic from expanding, we need to break the cycle of new HIV infections. All of us working together with government, communities and civil society can make the difference that is needed," he continued.

As many as 50,000 people attended the concert in Johannesburg, South Africa, which was telecast around the world. It was organized by Nelson Mandela's 46664 AIDS campaign and featured performances by artists such as Peter Gabriel, Ludacris, Razorlight, the Goo Goo Dolls and Annie Lennox.

At a fundraiser in the town of Midrand, in the province Gauteng, near Johannesburg on Friday, singer Annie Lennox had strong words for the South African government's AIDS policies.

"AIDS, as Madiba [Mandela] has said, is a human rights issue and should be treated as such in order to avoid this genocide that is affecting millions and millions of people around the world," said Lennox in a speech. Lennox has previously been critical of the South African government's position on suggesting some AIDS medications were toxic. "It is unacceptable that treatment has not been made available to those who need it most," said Lennox.

The rock band Queen, which lost its lead singer Freddie Mercury to AIDS, released a new song entitled, Say It's Not True, to coincide with World Aids Day. It has been made available as a free download from the band's website. "By making the song available for free, we hope to help Nelson Mandela with his campaign to get across the message that no-one is safe from infection," said Queen drummer Roger Taylor. "We have to be aware, we have to protect ourselves and those we love."

In China, people distributed AIDS prevention brochures in the streets and promoted safe sex in cities like Beijing and Shanghai. In Changsha, official warning signs were put on hotel bedstands. The government announced on Friday an allocation of CNY860 million for AIDS prevention and control. According to official reports, there are estimated to be 700,000 people living with HIV/AIDS in China.

Also in China, the Miss World 2007 was in Sanya on World AIDS Day. The pageant presented a special tribute to the fight against AIDS, with a televised speech from former South African President Nelson Mandela, along with traditional dancers from South Africa who joined the contestants in a special song.

Friday, United States President George W. Bush urged the United States Congress to double the 2003 Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief to US$30 billion over the next five years. "Above all, we rededicate ourselves to a great purpose: We will turn the tide against HIV/AIDS—once and for all," he said.

"I'm pleased to announce that Laura and I will travel to sub-Sahara Africa early next year," Bush said. Sub-Saharan Africa suffered nearly three-quarters of AIDS-related deaths during 2006 and is home to two-thirds of those living with HIV/AIDS.


text:
Template:2007 Taipei IT Month

zh:Template:2007 Taipei IT Month

title: Template:2007 Taipei IT Month


text:
Category:2007 Taipei IT Month

zh:Category:2007年資訊月

title: Category:2007 Taipei IT Month


text: Category:Taiwan IT Month

title: Category:Taiwan IT Month


text:
User talk:Darkermonk~enwikinews

Welcome
, welcome to Wikinews! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

Our key policies - if you read anything, read these! Here a few pointers to help you get to know Wikinews: There are always things to do on Wikinews: By the way, you can sign your name on Talk pages using four tildes ( ~~~~ ), which produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, you can ask them at the water cooler or to anyone on the Welcommittee, or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! Jcart1534 16:18, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Neutral point of view - tell every side to a story in a fair and balanced way
 * Cite sources - everything in a Wikinews article must be sourced
 * Introduction - overview of the site
 * Writing an article - how to write and publish a complete article
 * Content guide - what's suitable for Wikinews
 * Style guide - how articles should look before publishing
 * Contents - the contents page.
 * Existing articles need expanding and checking for spelling and mistakes
 * The front page lead articles often need updating
 * Developing stories need finishing and publishing
 * Discussions need your input
 * Audio Wikinews could always use more contributors
 * And of course, stories need writing!

Nice work!
Excellent work on the uranium smuggling article, Darkermonk. Hope we see more contributions from you. Cheers, Jcart1534 16:18, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Darkermonk. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Darkermonk~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:14, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:30, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Darkermonk~enwikinews


text:
Talk:Russians vote in parliamentary election

It's probably worth mentioning that the "United Russia" propaganda has been pushing for this election as a "popular referendum in support of the President". Int19h 16:30, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Please, include this evidence of elections falsification:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kmO6mkHkTPY --85.141.94.133 01:38, 3 December 2007 (UTC)


text:
English FA Cup third round draw

December 3, 2007

The draw for the third round of the 2007-08 FA Cup was held on December 2 in England.

The third round is where teams from the Premier League and Football League Championship join the cup.

Aston Villa have been drawn at home to Manchester United. The two teams will meet for the second time in two years. In the 2006-07 encounter Aston Villa were defeated 2-1 at Old Trafford.

There are three other fixtures consisting entirely of Premiership sides: Tottenham Hotspur v Reading, Sunderland v Wigan Athletic and West Ham United v Manchester City.

FA Cup holders Chelsea have been drawn at home against Championship side Queens Park Rangers.

Conference South team Havant & Waterlooville make their first appearance in the third round after surprising League Two side Notts County in the second round. Havant & Waterlooville's potential opponents Horsham will also make their debut at this stage of the FA Cup if they win away to Swansea in their second round replay.

The third round will take place on January 5, 2008. 64 teams will take part in 32 matches, with replays if a match ends in a draw.

title: English FA Cup third round draw


text:
Category talk:2007 Taipei IT Month

Series OR info
Some were translated, but mostly wrote with what I witnessed. Brock contact... 17:35, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Copy-edit
I did some copy-editing. As always, check my work.

I do have a problem with this quote: "No matter what a consumer will choose a computer with AMD or Intel, a consumer should consider on its functionality and practically before purchasing. As some low-price NBs (EeePC, OLPC) were launched before the show, NB manufacturers had considered and evaluated what a consumer really want. Sincerely, I recommend a consumer not be fooled by a NB's price but to consider its functionality first!"

The article doesn't say who said those words. --SVTCobra 18:34, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Sorry, that quote was said by retailers from BenQ and MSI, they said the same quote on different days. Brock contact... 19:28, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I credited them in the article. Did they really say the exact same thing? Anyway, my next question is: what is an NB? --SVTCobra 01:05, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, they really said so as I asked at their pavilions. BTW, NB often means on Notebook Computer in Taiwan. Brock contact... 04:42, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I clarified that nouns. Brock contact... 04:47, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Collaboration
I don't know if it is a good idea to have just one talk page for all articles in this category. --SVTCobra 15:15, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * But if some information gathered and collected in this talk page, it might be a good idea. Brock contact... 15:29, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

title: Category talk:2007 Taipei IT Month


text:
Talk:World AIDS Day events held around the globe

Free media?
Anyone know where to find free media from World AIDS Day events? I checked Commons and Flickr and the White House photo is about all I found. --SVTCobra 20:26, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I checked one of the official sites, and they seem very restrictive with the copyright on logos etc. Jcart1534 20:35, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * There is a World Aids Day ribbon on Commons, but I wonder about the permissions. Jcart1534 21:13, 2 December 2007 (UTC)


text:
Comments:Venezuela to vote over constitutional reform on Sunday

Chavez is going to be the ruin of democracy
Chavez is nothing but an aggitator. He has sought, not the betterment of his people as he claims, but to expand his own powers, to become a dictator. He has used censorship, propaganda, and threats to reach his goal, building ties with totalitarian states and forming alliances against the US, not that I'm a huge fan of the American government. HE says that all of this is for his people, and for their betterment, but he is a lier, and a hipocrit. Unfourtunatley the bill will pass because people are ignorant and don't listen to reason or intelligent opposition until its too late, but i pray it fails because South America is already such an unstable place. The region is full of passion and such strong beliefs, but people just keep working against one another and it has to end. We have to learn from our past mistakes, but nobody seems to remember. If this bill passes my faith in humanity will have died. Please learn, please listen, the world is in trouble.


text:
Ozzy Osbourne's personal possessions fetch $800,000 for charity

December 2, 2007 American heavy metal performer Ozzy Osbourne, who became famous as the lead vocalist for Black Sabbath and later as a solo act, has raised more than US$800,000 for The Sharon Osbourne Colon Cancer Program, founded by his spouse Sharon Osbourne at the Cedars Sinai Hospital, by auctioning off personal items.

A number of the items that he auctioned off over the two day period have been seen on his reality TV show The Osbournes, which featured home life with Sharon, Ozzy and their two children. Amongst some of the higher-priced items were a carved walnut Victorian-style custom built pool table which raised $11,250, a painting from Edourad Drouot which fetched $10,500, a pair of Ozzy's famous round glasses which raised $5,250 and a dog bed given to Sharon by Elton John which sold for $2,375.

Some more famous items were also amongst the 500 lots offered. Ozzy's black satin coat, complete with bat-wing cape, raised $3,300 and a hand-painted floral cup used regularly on The Osbournes made $1,625. A bronze plaque of a demon's head that was regularly seen in its position adorning the front door of their house had been expected to go for $800 to $1,200instead raised $8,750. A wire model of the Eiffel Tower from on the kitchen table sold for $10,000, while skull-covered trainers Ozzy had worn reached $2,625. Bidders came from as far away as Germany to buy what they could from his mansion in Beverly Hills, California.

However, three cars included in the auction failed to attract bidders and did not sell. They were a 2006 Bentley Continental Flying Spur, estimated at $160,000 to $180,000, a 2005 Cadillac CTS-V sedan estimated at $30,000 to $40,000 and a 1950 Oldsmobile Futuramic 88 Club Coupe previously owned by author Danielle Steel estimated at $40,000 to $50,000. Sharon had earlier said of the cars "We're not great car people. They really don't do a lot for us.''

Darren Julien, president of Julien's Auctions, which organised the two-day sale, said "It did very well. It raised some good money for a very worthy cause."

"For a celebrity garage sale, it was pretty spectacular.," he went on. He also commented on the fact that there was fierce competition for the many artworks included. "We had Ozzy fans bidding against these sophisticated fine art buyers, which you don't see every day. For the most part the metalheads were outbidding the art crowd."


text:
User:DerHexer

I live in Berlin, Germany, and I'm a steward at meta.wikimedia and a sysop at en.wikipedia and at de.wikipedia. I'm interested in Latin language, Chemistry and Ancient Greek. My contributions can be found here, and sorted by namespace here. At the moment I'm fighting vandalism.

title: User:DerHexer


text:
User talk:99.245.68.167

--Darth Kule - Comlink 22:58, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

title: User talk:99.245.68.167


text:
Comments:Aerosmith sued over late cancellation of gig in Maui, Hawaii

wouldnt it be better if they just had a makeup concert, and made it really cool? maybe a few exclusive songs from their new cd?