text:
User talk:Freiheit314

-- 18:16, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Freiheit314


text:
User talk:Arvekvalvik

-- 18:27, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: User talk:Arvekvalvik


text:
User talk:Engin64

-- 19:02, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Engin64


text:
User talk:Timemachine1967

-- 19:07, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Timemachine1967


text:
User talk:ASUnknown

-- 19:10, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:ASUnknown


text:
User talk:Outlaw265

-- 19:20, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Outlaw265


text:
Talk:BBC Radio 1 reverses "faggot" ruling hours after initial ban

Editprotected
Editprotected Please add Category:BBC. Thank you. -- Rayboy8 ( my talk ) ( my contributions ) 19:29, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 19:40, 17 February 2011 (UTC)


text:
User talk:Teatron20

-- 19:42, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Teatron20


text:
User talk:Omario123456

-- 19:48, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Hey there. Please don't add spam to pages; it ruins our effort at creating a collaborative news source. If you wish to edit constructively, and I hope you will, please review the links in the blue box at the top of the page. If you continue to add spam, however, your right to edit will be revoked. Regards, — μ 19:57, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Omario123456


text:
Wikinews talk:Criteria for speedy deletion/Archive one

Introduction
I propose that we adopt the following proposal regarding Speedy_deletion. There is no policy currently, and I thought it would be good to set things up so that we all know where we stand.

This is essentially a copy+paste of the en.Wikipedia policy, with a couple of points clarified or changed (especially #7). It is also my proposal that existing Tsunami Help pages be exempt from this policy, although future pages will be fair game.

Votes
This is where this policy may be voted upon. Please use the Talk Page for discussion on this proposal, in order to keep this page from becoming cluttered.

Support
 * I think the policy is overall very well-done. Regarding "almost no content" pages, I personally think it does not hurt to wait a few hours or so. Tomos 11:15, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * If Google News ever starts crawling us -- then vandalized articles will go global unless we nip them in the bud at an early stage (Google usually crawls live news sites every 10 minutes or so for changes or new stories) -- Davodd | Talk 05:55, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * -- Davodd | Talk 05:55, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Sounds good to me. Dan100 22:44, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Oppose

Opposition on lack of policy grounds
There has been no discussion of this policy, but it is already up on a poll. There is no way to actually certify the poll because:

 * There is no policy on how to create policy
 * There is no policy on how to determine if the policy "passed"
 * There is no policy on who may vote in the poll
 * There is no policy on how to validate votes
 * This poll has not even been listed on Polls

There isn't even a suggestion as to how long the poll can last. From the polls page, one poll was opened on Dec. 10, closed on December 18, with a grand total of 9 votes, only 6 of which were opposed (67%). Another was opened on November 16, is still open, has an average of 41 votes on the three proposal elements. (And did I mention there was no discussion on either page? just votes.)

- Amgine 07:26, 4 Jan 2005 (UTC)

 * Perhaps "poll" was a poor choice of word. What I wanted to do was poll the user's opinions, to see if this proposal was acceptable in its current form, and if not, to discuss how it might be changed to become acceptable to most users. Lankiveil 05:29, 5 Jan 2005 (UTC).

Run with it
Until anyone someone objects, I think we should use this as policy. Dan100 (Talk) 16:27, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)

 * I don't object to the content, but I do object to the term policy. Can we title this a convention/guideline? Then it will more likely receive the updating/fixing/adapting it needs. If so, I will go through and clean it up, fill in redlinks, etc.

 * Also, can we place it under Wikinews:Policies and guidelines/Deletion guidelines/Speedy deletion? This would, again, make it easier to understand, modify, and contain a hierarchy link at the top. - 24.85.65.249 19:48, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC) This was me, and it's taken this long to get logged in - Amgine 20:19, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)

addition
i proposed an addition to this "policy" or "guideline" or whatever it is concitered. See: Water_cooler/policy--Ryan524 09:20, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Proposed addition: Cut & Paste Copyvios.
Discussion on a proposed addition for speedy delete to Speedy deletion guidelines, see: Water_cooler/policy for discussion. -- Davodd | Talk 04:55, 28 July 2005 (UTC)

Speedy delete addition - Cut & Paste copyvio
I propose we add an additional speedy delete criterion to Speedy deletion guidelines: Cut & Paste Copyvios. My proposal:
 * 11. An obvious copyright violation that is a cut-and-paste exact or near-exact duplicate of content from a copyrighted source. Speedy delete does not apply for public-domain sources, when public domain reprint permission is granted from the original source and specified in the article talk page, or to articles with a third-party edit history.

We are getting a slew of these things and the WN:DR wait is too long since they are being listed on news feed like google news as seen here. We need to nip these obvious copyvios in the bud before they hit the feeds. -- Davodd | Talk 04:53, 28 July 2005 (UTC)

Agree. ClareWhite 07:41, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
 * I propose not that these articles be speedy deleted, but that they be tagged and given a 24 hour period since their creation to develop, and if they are not developed, they can be deleted on sight. This way, legitimate stories that users are willing to de-copyvio can't just be deleted immediately.  I've heard the excuse that it is Wikimedia policy to delete the history of a page if there was every any copyrighted material, but what I have to say back is that Wikipedia articles get tons of copyvios to their articles every hour, and they don't have any plans to wipe those article's histories clean because of one vandal.  -- NGerda 07:47, July 28, 2005 (UTC)
 * We would still need to delete the copyvio version from the article history. -- Davodd | Talk 15:14, 28 July 2005 (UTC)

Agree with Davodd - delete at once. However, we should probably also leave a note on the talk page of the user to let them know what happened. Dan100 (Talk) 08:26, 28 July 2005 (UTC)

 * We could move the copy-vio on their Talk page with an explanation that they need to work it into a sourced story before re-submitting it? That should make the point and people can follow the trail if they wish. It won't be on the news space then. ClareWhite 08:51, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
 * I like that additional guideline. It also could apply to many other speedy deletes. -- Davodd | Talk 15:13, 28 July 2005 (UTC)

Agree with all this - allow editors to deal with it in the quickest way so we don't get copyvios showing up on Google News. - McCart42 (talk) 15:18:23, 2005-07-28 (UTC)

If you delete something you should tell the creator
If you delete something you should tell the creator. If you don't, they're probally give up on wikinews because the article/whatever magicly disapeared. the users are not going to know how to look it up in the deletion log to see what went wrong. They also can't fix the problem without it being told to them what it is. This seems kind of common sense to me. Bawolff ☺☻ 08:09, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
 * I agree with this idea for items deleted because they are not news or copyvio, however most things speedy deleted are complete rubbish and telling the person would only be a waste of time --Cspurrier 15:37, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

Speedy Deletions are bad
People should be able to vote on a specific article as they view it. If the article is without merit, people should vote it off. Then you can choose to view questionable content or not.

Another idea would be to make a post or series of post be credible, only if the poster has previously posted credible links in the past, has been viewed by credible moderators, and has matured to some point. New posts should go trough a maturity phase, and be listed in imature links. Only kids and those who don't wish to view potential risky sites should view the links and updates that have been ... looking for a good phrase... "burned in".

Deleting Adhoc is Stupid and Dangerous. Only when things get out of control should the moderator bring in the hatchet.

Just Ideas,

Marc Noon

 * Hi. I think the idea is that you select administrators whose judgment you can reasonably trust, and let them make some of less important judgments. It is best of those judgments are routine and well-defined so that there is high likelihood that people agree most of the time. It is best of the consequences of those judgments are reversible, and not very big.
 * Discussion for deletion do happen, as you might be aware, but it tends to receive smaller attention than it should, if it were to handle all deletion candidates as you suggest. Think about the fact that, for example, in order to see if an article is a copyvio of an external site, you would need to see the matches between the two texts, see if the external site's text precedes the one posted on Wikinews, see if any license terms permits reuse on Wikinews, see if the copyright holder posted it on Wikinews, and judge if any reasonable chance that fair use defense could be made. That is a lot of work if you want to do it carefully. And people here are probably more interested in writing news stories, not assessing potential copyvio cases..
 * See also Proposed deletion.
 * Tomos 23:19, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

broken redirects
Hi. I was just informed that deleting broken redirects would increase the server load, while they are not that harmful if left undeleted.

If that is the case, I thought we should remove the broken redirects from the guideline.

Just to be clear, I am talking about the kind of broken redirects that cannot be fixed. When you delete an article for copyvio, for example, redirects to that deleted article become broken and you cannot fix it most of the time.

Tomos 23:04, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

I've learned that some people do support the idea of deleting broken redirects. I don't have strong opinion either way. So I have just changed my mind and instead of proposing to change the guideline, I now suggest that we inform admins of this server load issue.

Indeed I just went ahead and inserted such a note.

Tomos 14:28, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Suggestion
I think that a new criteria should be added : "articles on events that occurred over 5 days ago" Anonymous101  15:05, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree it would be helpful to speedy so-called "old-news" but I don't know how specific we want to get with a cutoff perhaps there should be some discretion given to the admin, but we also need allowances for events that happened a while ago, but only recently came to light. --SVTCobra 15:34, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I think such articles should go through dr. Bawolff ☺☻ 09:43, 8 July 2008 (UTC)


text:
User talk:Jesterbard

-- 19:55, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jesterbard


text:
User talk:Backdrunk

-- 20:01, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Backdrunk


text:
Yale University builds world's first anti-laser

February 18, 2011 A team at in the US has built the world's first  — or coherent perfect absorber (CPA). The device, constructed from, absorbs light and dissipates the energy as heat.

Professor Hui Cao's researchers were following on from theoretical work last year by Professor Douglas Stone. Stone explained "we were working on a theory that could predict what could be used to form a laser," and the theory also predicted the possibility of an anti-laser. Lasers amplify light to produce pulses. The new anti-laser focuses two identical laser beams towards each other. The light is trapped in an and bounces until all the energy is converted into heat. The one constructed by Yale used a piece of silicon 110 wide; it absorbed 99.4% of light at a wavelength of 998.5, which is close to.

Stone felt "[t]heory and experiment matched very well. We couldn't have expected to do any better." The theory suggests that 99.999% could be absorbed, but Yale blamed "experimental limitations" for not achieving this. Yale explained that more sophisticated anti-lasers may approach this absorption rate, and added that simulations suggest much smaller versions could be made.

The research team believes it could have applications in, with machines and not  like regular computers. Many computer components are already manufactured from silicon. Since the energy is dissipated as heat, however, use is limited against since the heat would damage the target anyway.

General light-absorption is not difficult, according to Stone, but this is the first time a device has been built targeted to the specific-wavelength beams produced by lasers.


text:
User talk:BarbaraKB~enwikinews

-- 20:15, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called BarbaraKB. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name BarbaraKB~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:14, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:29, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:BarbaraKB~enwikinews


text:
User talk:Juan B P

-- 20:21, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Juan B P


text:
User talk:The Global Leaders

-- 20:27, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:The Global Leaders


text:
Talk:Yale University builds world's first anti-laser

 * Note that to confirm Hui Cao is a professor, you need to actually follow the link on the source. It's under the menu, on the left. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 20:39, 17 February 2011 (UTC)


text:
User talk:BlancheDevereauxGG

-- 20:39, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:BlancheDevereauxGG


text:
Thread:Comments:UK Prince William picks brother Harry to be best man at royal wedding/Comments from feedback form - "ok, but cud do with some more ..."

ok, but cud do with some more info


text:
User talk:Victor265

-- 20:46, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Victor265


text:
User talk:Dran23

-- 20:57, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dran23


text:
User talk:Rhone

-- 21:00, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rhone


text:
User talk:Kyuchang.jo

-- 21:13, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kyuchang.jo


text:
User talk:Reznicma

-- 21:22, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Reznicma


text:
User talk:Hannahw2~enwikinews

-- 21:23, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Hannahw2. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Hannahw2~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:15, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:32, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hannahw2~enwikinews


text:
User talk:Mastertom153

-- 21:36, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mastertom153


text:
User talk:Brainsignals

-- 21:56, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Brainsignals


text:
User talk:WendyVinca

-- 22:06, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:WendyVinca


text:
User talk:Zatt

-- 22:14, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Zatt


text:
User talk:Dosti4you

-- 22:15, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dosti4you


text:
User talk:Agrock

-- 22:15, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Agrock


text:
User talk:Rabbabodrool

-- 22:18, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rabbabodrool


text:
User talk:Dymas666

-- 22:21, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dymas666


text:
User talk:Datalist

-- 22:22, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Datalist


text:
User talk:Palofalto

-- 22:34, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Palofalto


text:
User talk:Victorhmr

-- 22:41, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Victorhmr


text:
User talk:Drummer15

-- 22:42, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Drummer15


text:
User talk:Eranb

-- 22:44, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Eranb


text:
User talk:Agustinus G. Tamelan

-- 22:51, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Agustinus G. Tamelan


text:
User talk:Thokonoko

-- 22:59, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Thokonoko


text:
User talk:Doktorjericho

-- 23:32, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Doktorjericho


text:
User talk:Grassleaf

-- 23:35, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Grassleaf


text:
User talk:Brenno lindo

-- 23:38, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Brenno lindo


text:
User talk:Cokyrivera

-- 23:59, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Cokyrivera


text:
User talk:Prins50

-- 00:15, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Prins50


text:
User talk:Rzuniga099

-- 00:15, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rzuniga099


text: Comments:Yale University builds world's first anti-laser


text:
User talk:Reptarx

-- 00:36, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Reptarx


text:
User talk:3RRORCode

-- 00:45, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:3RRORCode


text:
User talk:Belencitha

-- 01:08, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Belencitha


text:
User talk:Apesteilen

-- 01:33, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Apesteilen


text:
User talk:M3LL0WY3LL0W

-- 01:37, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:M3LL0WY3LL0W


text:
User talk:Ajr07

-- 01:41, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ajr07


text:
User talk:Abhishekh19

-- 01:55, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Abhishekh19


text:
User talk:Darknights93

-- 01:58, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Darknights93


text:
User talk:Rvanderkooy

-- 02:06, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rvanderkooy


text:
User talk:Andy Alonso

-- 02:22, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Andy Alonso


text:
User talk:S7ARK1LL3R

-- 02:31, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:S7ARK1LL3R


text:
User talk:MatChem121

-- 02:44, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:MatChem121


text:
User talk:Jmjm11

-- 02:51, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jmjm11


text:
User talk:Myha89

-- 02:57, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Myha89


text:
User talk:Arespectablecitizen

-- 03:17, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Arespectablecitizen


text:
User talk:Minecraftrules

-- 03:23, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Minecraftrules


text:
User talk:Protekcorp

-- 03:28, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Protekcorp


text:
User talk:Hieremiam.Patricius.Patrieti

-- 03:55, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hieremiam.Patricius.Patrieti


text:
User talk:Neunomad

-- 04:19, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Neunomad


text:
User talk:Lyfa7410

-- 04:20, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lyfa7410


text:
User talk:Toria1012

-- 04:21, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Toria1012


text:
User talk:Philipparham

-- 04:30, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Philipparham


text:
User talk:Caesarteh

-- 04:30, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Caesarteh


text:
User talk:Amy76

-- 04:38, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

 — Mike moral  ♪♫  06:38, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Amy76


text:
User talk:RebelKnightCSA

-- 05:01, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:RebelKnightCSA


text:
User talk:Omer.solehry

-- 05:17, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Omer.solehry


text:
User talk:Axelfar

-- 05:27, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Axelfar


text:
User talk:Rajkamalt

-- 05:46, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rajkamalt


text:
User talk:Utilidae

-- 06:15, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Utilidae


text:
User talk:Bagadbaba

-- 06:36, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bagadbaba


text:
User talk:Goldkist

-- 06:38, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Goldkist


text:
User talk:Bharat2504

-- 06:41, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bharat2504


text:
User talk:Moshik10

-- 06:47, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Moshik10


text:
User talk:Nccuwucy

-- 06:56, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nccuwucy


text:
User talk:Hariharank12

-- 07:03, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hariharank12


text:
User talk:Jlaik01

-- 07:05, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jlaik01


text:
User talk:Bhagath88

-- 07:38, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bhagath88


text:
Thread:Comments:Yale University builds world's first anti-laser/Awesome!

Take that, Wikipedia! Delete an article I started calling it "mythical"? Mythical my eye! Vindication is mine! 67.246.33.203 (talk) 08:12, 18 February 2011 (UTC)


text:
User talk:Tfll

-- 08:16, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tfll


text:
User talk:Admiralhost

-- 08:25, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Admiralhost


text:
User talk:Anthony1085

-- 08:47, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Anthony1085


text:
User talk:Davudazul

-- 08:50, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Davudazul


text:
User talk:Mys bot

-- 08:53, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mys bot


text:
User talk:JANETSTAR

-- 08:53, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:JANETSTAR


text:
User talk:Aguscandrasuratmaja

-- 09:09, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Aguscandrasuratmaja


text:
User talk:Иваннт

-- 09:15, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Иваннт


text:
User talk:Denem80

-- 09:17, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Denem80


text:
User talk:Diohuni

-- 10:32, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Diohuni


text:
User talk:Bedu786

-- 10:36, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bedu786


text:
User talk:Anto Beslie

-- 10:38, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Anto Beslie


text:
User talk:Psubhashish

-- 10:50, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Psubhashish


text:
User talk:Brendanology

-- 11:19, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Brendanology


text:
User talk:Escuzao

-- 11:23, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Escuzao


text:
User talk:Monaco418

-- 11:25, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Monaco418


text:
User talk:Andres he

-- 11:37, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Andres he


text:
User talk:Getpowerpad

-- 11:44, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Getpowerpad


text:
User talk:Jabss2000

-- 11:50, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jabss2000


text:
User talk:Manoj~enwikinews

-- 11:51, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Manoj. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Manoj~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:21, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:34, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Manoj~enwikinews


text:
User talk:Tateisukan

-- 12:04, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tateisukan


text:
User talk:Michel BUZE

-- 12:57, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Michel BUZE


text:
User talk:Sonujacobjose

-- 12:59, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sonujacobjose


text:
User talk:Integritydan

-- 13:04, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Integritydan


text:
User talk:Bobber0001

I very rarely log in. To get in touch with me use my talk page on regular en.wikipedia (also bobber0001 as account) Bobber0001 (talk) 02:28, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bobber0001


text:
User talk:Amnaswal

-- 13:18, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Amnaswal


text:
User talk:Ykvach

-- 13:39, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ykvach


text:
User talk:Андрей Герасименко

-- 13:44, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Андрей Герасименко


text:
User talk:InevitableWorks

-- 13:50, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:InevitableWorks


text:
User talk:Нуртай

-- 13:52, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Нуртай


text:
User talk:Rajatix2010

-- 13:54, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rajatix2010


text:
User talk:Transmutative madness

-- 14:04, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Transmutative madness


text:
User talk:Afavoritaweb

-- 14:15, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Afavoritaweb


text:
User talk:Manuelharguin

-- 14:39, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Manuelharguin


text:
User talk:YashRajFilms

-- 14:44, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:YashRajFilms


text:
User talk:Dougrasheed

-- 14:45, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dougrasheed


text:
User talk:ProTent

-- 14:57, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:ProTent


text:
User talk:Faryne

-- 15:17, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Faryne


text:
User talk:Mouradthoumi

-- 15:23, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mouradthoumi


text:
User talk:Ia maciel

-- 15:28, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ia maciel


text:
User talk:Sggjbakerp

-- 15:31, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sggjbakerp


text:
User talk:Jambeeno

-- 15:32, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jambeeno


text:
User talk:Ostii

-- 15:35, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ostii


text:
User talk:Samsudar Syam

-- 15:43, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Samsudar Syam


text:
User talk:Giuliano Bonetto

-- 15:46, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Giuliano Bonetto


text:
User talk:Karthik semban

-- 15:57, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Karthik semban


text:
Template:W/doc

This template generates a conditional link — either to a local target if it exists, or to (ordinarily) Wikipedia if the local target does not exist.

Optional named parameter  links to a specific section of a Wikipedia page, and does not attempt to autodetect a local target. It should be rarely used; eliminating template calls that use it requires idiosyncratic remedies.

Removing
Exercise care when removing calls to this template from a page: it is used, in part, to keep track of page categorization.
 * If the local target doesn't exist, you probably shouldn't be removing the template call.
 * If the local target does exist, consider whether the calling page should belong to some category associated with the local target, and if it should belong but doesn't, add it to that category. Then eliminate the locally linking template call by changing   to.

This template populates three hidden categories: when linking to Wikipedia (without an anchor), it adds the calling page to Category:Pages with defaulting non-local links; when linking to the local target, it adds the calling page to Category:Pages with categorizable local links; when linking to Wikipedia with an anchor, it adds the calling page to Category:Pages with forced foreign links.

A gadget is provided to complement this template, "Underline in green categorizable w links". The gadget also puts a dashed underline on forced foreign w links.

Other parameters
Optional parameter  can be set to any non-blank value to suppress categorization of the calling page based on this template call.

Optional parameter  can be set to either of two values to cause specialized effects. This optional parameter is ignored if  is used.
 * links to Wikipedia, without checking for a local target. Categorizes to Category:Pages with forced foreign links.
 * behaves as usual for local links, but if the link would be to Wikipedia, the label is unlinked. Does not affect categorization, which is still to Category:Pages with defaulting non-local links.

Optional parameter  can be set to the wikilink prefix of a sister other than Wikipedia, to override Wikipedia as the choice of non-local target when wikilinking non-locally. It has no effect on whether a non-local wikilink is provided, only on the target when used. Omit the trailing ":" from the prefix. For example,  would link to. There's a table of the prefixes for various sisters at meta. For non-English languages, use the sister prefix, a colon, and the language code; for example,  would link to  (as of this writing, Souhail Alouini has no local target and no en.wp target).

TemplateData
{	"params": { "1": {			"label": "target", "description": "Page to link to", "type": "string", "required": true },		"2": {			"label": "label", "description": "Text to display instead of the target link", "type": "string" },		"anchor": { "label": "anchor", "description": "Link to a specific section of a Wikipedia page", "type": "string" }	},	"description": "A template to generate a conditional link - link to a local target if it exists, else link to Wikipedia." }

es:Plantilla:W fa:الگو:و ru:Шаблон:W

title: Template:W/doc


text:
User talk:Lazza900

-- 16:07, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lazza900


text:
User talk:Ricardo Pineda

-- 16:10, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ricardo Pineda


text:
User talk:Aliapur

-- 16:18, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Aliapur


text:
User talk:Ristrac97

-- 16:26, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ristrac97


text:
User talk:RadManCF

-- 16:27, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:RadManCF


text:
User talk:Enio Carlos

-- 16:28, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Enio Carlos


text:
User talk:Cristian Henrique Kranz

-- 16:28, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Cristian Henrique Kranz


text:
User talk:38.127.195.123

Welcome to Wikinews! Thanks for creating Timothy Vandehey. Unfortunately, it had to be deleted due to the fact that it met one of the criteria for speedy deletion. All articles on Wikinews have to be about news events, and I do not believe that your article reports on a news event.

I really hope that you choose to continue contributing to Wikinews, although I strongly suggest you read Wikinews' content guide and our guide to writing an article first.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page, or ask other contributers to Wikinews on our assistance page.

Thanks,

Δεν δοδγε  t\c 16:31, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:38.127.195.123


text:
User talk:Zomah2

-- 16:31, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Zomah2


text:
User talk:Kinwttw

-- 16:36, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kinwttw


text:
User talk:Jmg.cmdi

-- 16:47, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jmg.cmdi


text:
User talk:Simber89

-- 16:55, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Simber89


text:
User talk:Karen ferreira

-- 17:01, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Karen ferreira


text:
User talk:Luk.Moravec

-- 17:14, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Luk.Moravec


text:
User talk:Ahmed Fouad(the lord of programming)

-- 17:15, 18 February 2011 (UTC)


text:
Australian town to change name to promote road safety

February 18, 2011

The residents of, a small town in the south-east of Australia, have made the decision to modify the name of the town for one month in an attempt to improve road safety in the country. The name of the town will be adjusted to SpeedKills across next month.

The idea was created by the. A campaign was launched on the social networking website Facebook, saying that if 10,000 'liked' the campaign page, the name of the town — which has a population of 45 — would be changed. 'Rename Speed' has now gone on to achieve over 33,000 likes.

Previously, had used various advertising campaigns in an attempt to get motorists to reduce speed. However, these campaigns were in large part unsuccessful. In 2010, Australia experienced a 25% increase in deaths on rural roads. TAC spokesperson Phil Reed has stated that, with this new name change campaign, "[w]e're trying to get people to stay within the speed limits, obey road safety rules" and cause motorists to "realise that when they don't, people die".

One inhabitant of Speed has also made the decision to change his name during March. Phil Down, who grows wheat and raises sheep, has decided to change his name to Phil Slow Down. Speaking to the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, Down explained: "It's virtually on the road to somewhere else, so we've taken our quirky name and run with it to bring the attention to the campaign of trying to get people to slow down on country roads and especially through small towns".


text:
Thread:Comments:Fifteen receive US Presidential Medal of Freedom/One who should've won it

Daniel Hernandez. The staffer whose quick actions saved Rep. Giffords' life.


text:
User talk:Rajeev.pokkandath

-- 17:38, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rajeev.pokkandath


text:
User talk:Марат756

-- 17:50, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Марат756


text:
User talk:Maynor Leonel Chile Sente

-- 18:12, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Maynor Leonel Chile Sente


text:
User talk:Snishad

-- 18:24, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Snishad


text:
User talk:65.5.128.19

Blood Red Sandman (Talk)   (Contribs) 18:30, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:65.5.128.19


text:
User talk:Bothra009

-- 18:39, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bothra009


text:
User talk:R quillen

-- 19:05, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:R quillen


text:
User talk:Brumpetstar

-- 19:11, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Brumpetstar


text:
User talk:René Milla Auger

-- 19:16, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:René Milla Auger


text:
User talk:Sfs90

-- 19:20, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sfs90


text:
User talk:Maamirdel

-- 19:22, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Maamirdel


text:
User talk:Hejtmar

-- 19:36, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hejtmar


text:
User talk:Jai027

-- 19:36, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jai027


text:
Talk:Australian town to change name to promote road safety

Name of the town
The name of the town should be mentioned in the title IMO. Diego Grez return fire 19:47, 18 February 2011 (UTC)


text: Comments:Australian town to change name to promote road safety


text:
User talk:Sfalcont

-- 19:55, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sfalcont


text:
User talk:X tray

-- 19:56, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:X tray


text:
User talk:Mikador

-- 20:03, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mikador


text:
User talk:Imugel 13

-- 20:08, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Imugel 13


text:
User talk:Sisko24

-- 20:51, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sisko24


text:
User talk:Suponik

-- 21:02, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Suponik


text:
User talk:Secret rock

-- 21:12, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Secret rock


text:
User talk:Srt7

-- 21:12, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Srt7


text:
User talk:Ora Unu

-- 21:42, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ora Unu


text:
User talk:Solrac3

-- 21:51, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Solrac3


text:
User talk:Orgmol

-- 22:21, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Orgmol


text:
User talk:Peanutbutterspartan

-- 22:26, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Peanutbutterspartan


text:
User talk:Mreiling~enwikinews

-- 22:27, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Mreiling. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Mreiling~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:22, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:34, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mreiling~enwikinews


text:
User talk:Jetstreamer

-- 22:27, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jetstreamer


text:
User talk:Musikus44

-- 22:30, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Musikus44


text:
User talk:Cmark304

-- 22:31, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Cmark304


text:
User talk:Luna86

-- 22:44, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Luna86


text:
User talk:Mattholder11028

-- 02:12, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mattholder11028


text:
User talk:Zlqq2144

-- 02:28, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Zlqq2144


text:
User talk:Blackash

-- 02:35, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Blackash


text:
User talk:Zzuhlg

-- 02:36, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Zzuhlg


text:
User talk:Quangdau

-- 03:14, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Quangdau


text:
User talk:Redtapo123

-- 03:17, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Redtapo123


text:
User talk:Kisutha 83

-- 03:32, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kisutha 83


text:
User talk:Aprathyush

-- 03:49, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Aprathyush


text:
User talk:Socceteer

-- 03:58, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Socceteer


text:
User talk:RaymondSutanto

-- 04:18, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:RaymondSutanto


text:
User talk:Okoliechigozie

-- 04:38, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Okoliechigozie


text:
User talk:Bhavyashree

-- 04:48, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bhavyashree


text:
User talk:RaShEeD-80

-- 05:16, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:RaShEeD-80


text:
User talk:NatalieNgu

-- 05:33, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:NatalieNgu


text:
User talk:Nhockx muoi

-- 05:50, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nhockx muoi


text:
User talk:Jefftrex

-- 05:58, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jefftrex


text:
Thread:Comments:Australian town to change name to promote road safety/Laughable

I think this is a good gesture on point to attempt to lower traffic accidents in the region, but in the end it boils down to being just that - a gesture. Most likely laughable at any rate.


text:
User talk:Arthurxie

-- 06:34, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Arthurxie


text:
Comments:Man killed over Halloween hat in London, England

Comments from feedback form - "xamvinadm,fglwrmat dracu"
xamvinadm,fglwrmat dracu —89.47.124.73 (talk) 06:43, 19 February 2011 (UTC)


text:
User talk:Cast2688

-- 07:18, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Cast2688


text:
User talk:אדעולם

-- 07:19, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:אדעולם


text:
User talk:Firmwear

-- 07:23, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Firmwear


text:
User talk:Samanyou

-- 07:45, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Samanyou


text:
User talk:Дос Сантуш

-- 07:52, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Дос Сантуш


text:
User talk:Soldyrkan

-- 08:12, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Soldyrkan


text:
Thread:Comments:Canadian rapper Bad News Brown murdered in Montreal/Comments from feedback form - "I might be a Filipino like him..."

I might be a Filipino like him but I hate modern music (1990s and 2000s), so I'm VERY happy that he died! Long live Classic Music!


text:
User talk:BrutusVT

-- 09:00, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:BrutusVT


text:
User talk:Meteoro77

-- 09:20, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Meteoro77


text:
2011 Cricket World Cup: India vs Bangladesh

February 21, 2011

won the first match of the against  by 87 runs on February 19. The match was played at the  in, Bangladesh.

Bangladesh won the toss and chose to bowl first. In the Indian, scored the highest total, 175 runs off 140 balls, his highest one-day international score and  played his debut World Cup match and scored a , while remaining unbeaten on 100.

The first referral of the World Cup came after the 4th ball of the 2nd innings was bowled. India's had bowled a yorker and the umpire declared it not out. referred it to the TV umpire and a replay showed it might have missed the leg stump, so the original decision was upheld. The match marked the debut of the controversial umpire referral system in World Cup cricket.

Indian Innings
Fall of wickets: 1-69 (Tendulkar, 10.5 ov), 2-152 (Gambhir, 23.2 ov), 3-355 (Sehwag, 47.3 ov), 4-370 (Pathan, 49.6 ov)

Bangladesh Innings
Fall of wickets: 1-56 (Imrul Kayes, 6.5 ov), 2-129 (Junaid Siddique, 23.1 ov), 3-188 (Tamim Iqbal, 32.1 ov), 4-234 (Shakib Al Hasan, 39.4 ov), 5-248 (Mushfiqur Rahim, 42.3 ov), 6-261 (Mahmudullah, 44.3 ov), 7-275 (Naeem Islam, 46.3 ov), 8-279 (Abdur Razzak, 47.6 ov), 9-280 (Shafiul Islam, 48.3 ov)

Player of the match:

Umpires: (Aus),  (Sri) TV umpire: (West Indies) Match referee: (Sri) Reserve umpire: (Pak)


text:
User talk:Rugge98

-- 09:27, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rugge98


text:
User talk:Bekiryonem

-- 09:34, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bekiryonem


text:
User talk:K.abhijeetnalco

-- 09:47, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:K.abhijeetnalco


text:
User talk:Feebee06

-- 09:48, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Feebee06


text:
User talk:Santhoshkumar~enwikinews

-- 09:56, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Santhoshkumar. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Santhoshkumar~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:28, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:36, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Santhoshkumar~enwikinews


text: Category:2011 Cricket World Cup

title: Category:2011 Cricket World Cup


text:
User talk:Hta1905

-- 10:13, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hta1905


text: File:2011 Cricket World Cup Logo.svg

title: File:2011 Cricket World Cup Logo.svg


text:
Category:Cricket World Cup

World Cup

title: Category:Cricket World Cup


text:
User talk:Noufel HIGOUN

-- 10:55, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Noufel HIGOUN


text:
User talk:DigitalCommun

-- 11:07, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:DigitalCommun


text:
User talk:Yasir707

-- 11:12, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Yasir707


text:
User talk:Herbert e Dohrmann

-- 11:51, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Herbert e Dohrmann


text:
User talk:Kano

-- 12:04, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kano


text:
User talk:Bbeurdouche

-- 12:11, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bbeurdouche


text:
User talk:Rahully2j

-- 12:33, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rahully2j


text:
User talk:W.r.bedzinski

-- 12:48, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:W.r.bedzinski


text:
User talk:Darios

-- 12:52, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Darios


text:
User talk:Chandup14

-- 13:00, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Chandup14


text:
User talk:30scorp

-- 13:13, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:30scorp


text:
Thread:Comments:Canadian rapper Bad News Brown murdered in Montreal/Comments from feedback form - "I might be a Filipino like him..."/reply

Me too. Rappers are a drag on society.


text:
User talk:Cuongnova

-- 13:35, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Cuongnova


text:
User talk:Sergey feo

-- 13:37, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sergey feo


text:
User talk:Editor510

-- 13:39, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Editor510


text:
User talk:Arfaz

-- 13:43, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Arfaz


text:
User talk:Rooneywayne17

-- 13:46, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rooneywayne17


text:
User talk:Gyroscoop

-- 13:55, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gyroscoop


text:
Talk:2011 Cricket World Cup: India vs Bangladesh

Date
The match was on 19 Feb 2011, not 21 Feb. Kindly make the change. -- ashwinikalantri talk 18:32, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
 * That maybe the case, but the article was published on the 21. DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 18:37, 25 February 2011 (UTC)


text:
User talk:Lyes L

-- 14:25, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lyes L


text:
User talk:Hinduway

-- 14:27, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hinduway


text:
User talk:Soccerabcd

-- 14:35, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Soccerabcd


text:
Kuwait stateless protest for rights

February 19, 2011 A thousand or more non-citizen residents of Kuwait demonstrated yesterday demanding rights given to Kuwaiti citizens. Police used water cannons in dispersing the protest. There were injuries among both protesters and police, and several protesters were detained.

Citizens of Kuwait receive substantial welfare benefits, including education and health care. There are estimated to be around 100,000 non-citizen residents, called "bidoons" (from bedoun jinsiyya, Arabic meaning without nationality). Many bidoons claim descent from desert nomads who did not apply for citizenship in 1959. Many bidoons live in economic hardship, and cannot get legal recognitions such as birth and death certificates, driver's licenses, and attested marriage contracts.

Interior Ministry spokesman Adil Al-Hashash said "security forces on the ground talked to the protestors in a nice and civilized way", telling them "they should go to the legal channels for their demands rather than protesting." The government says police acted in self-defense after protesters threw rocks.

Independent Kuwaiti Daifallah Buramia said "[t]he protest of bidoons is legitimate and the government is responsible for this because it has failed to resolve the problem".

title: Kuwait stateless protest for rights


text:
User talk:Windchou

-- 14:55, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Windchou


text:
User talk:Psuryatejreddy

-- 14:58, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Psuryatejreddy


text:
User talk:Torreslfchero

-- 15:36, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Torreslfchero


text: Talk:Kuwait stateless protest for rights


text: Comments:Kuwait stateless protest for rights


text:
User talk:Gicu19742

-- 15:42, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gicu19742


text:
User talk:Prof bed

-- 15:55, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Prof bed


text:
User talk:木饭

-- 16:01, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:木饭


text:
User talk:Krtickak

-- 16:04, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Krtickak


text:
User talk:Arun shridhar

-- 16:07, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Arun shridhar


text:
User talk:Knesux

-- 16:09, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Knesux


text:
User talk:Game1524

-- 16:10, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Game1524


text:
User talk:Emmygenie

-- 16:13, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Emmygenie


text:
Wikinews:Polish Wikinews Press Photo 2011

The Polish Wikinews Press Photo 2011 was a contest aimed to choose "the best photographs taken by Wikinewsies or Wikimedians, and used in Wikinews articles in 2010." The contest was inspired by our own English Wikinews' Picture of the Year, which hasn't worked for about three years, and its name refers to the global photographers competition World Press Photo.

The competition
The competition consisted of two phases, which were the same for both categories: Global Wikinews (pictures from any Wikinews project, including the English version), and Polish Wikinews-only.

The first phase
The first phase lasted from January 28, 2011, until February 10 midnight.

Eighteen pictures were nominated for the Polish Wikinews-only category, only six of them made it to the finals; while eight pictures from other Wikinews versions were nominated, including the main picture of English Wikinews' article Chilean earthquakes: in pictures. Four of them passed to the final round.

The second, and final phase
The second phase began on February 12, and lasted until February 18. The results were announced on February 19, on Polish Wikinews' sixth birthday.

The winning pictures were:

pl:Wikinews:Wikinews Press Photo 2011


text:
User talk:Manutdrockz

-- 16:17, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Manutdrockz


text:
Thread:Comments:Canadian rapper Bad News Brown murdered in Montreal/Comments from feedback form - "I might be a Filipino like him..."/reply (2)

I don't like 'modern music' much either (I prefer the eighties music, and some 90s ones), but getting happy for someone else's death is just cruel, do you think your family would be happy if you died right now? Put yourself in their place.


text:
User talk:Assassin31400

-- 16:18, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Assassin31400


text:
User talk:Tmeski

-- 16:20, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tmeski


text:
Thread:Comments:Former Egyptian president Mubarak reportedly ill, may be in coma/Comments from feedback form - "Quite a good article but not b..."/reply (2)

I think it was a good topic. I was amazed by this information in relation to related current events. It might not be a coinsidence.


text:
User talk:Bibliofagos

-- 16:29, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bibliofagos


text:
User talk:Нарутик

-- 16:34, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Нарутик


text:
User talk:Luzbelito82

-- 16:35, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Luzbelito82


text:
User talk:Ghost563

-- 16:44, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ghost563


text:
User talk:Pkeets

-- 16:51, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Pkeets


text:
User talk:DuDu3

-- 16:57, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:DuDu3


text:
User talk:G23941

-- 17:34, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:G23941


text:
User:AshwiniKalantri

Ashwini Kalantri

title: User:AshwiniKalantri


text:
User talk:Kd354mvp

-- 17:57, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kd354mvp


text:
User talk:TresPuntosBe

-- 18:01, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:TresPuntosBe


text:
User talk:Mrchrispy13

-- 18:01, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mrchrispy13


text:
User talk:Oldthudman

-- 18:04, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Oldthudman


text:
User talk:Nasiri.F DC

-- 18:37, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nasiri.F DC


text:
User talk:Metegokalp

-- 18:47, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Metegokalp


text:
User talk:John aristides

-- 19:01, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:John aristides


text:
User talk:Kaminoke0217

-- 19:06, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kaminoke0217


text:
Thread:Comments:Australian town to change name to promote road safety/not too bad

Well, I think it could have a positive effect. Just like with images of lung cancer and destroyed teeth & gums may ward away potential buyers of cigarettes...maybe "speedkills" can act as a similar deterrant. Perhaps they could add some images of mangled bodies in a car crash :).


text:
User talk:Dajazam

-- 19:19, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dajazam


text:
User talk:Hommane

-- 19:32, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hommane


text:
Thread:Comments:Australian town to change name to promote road safety/Laughable/reply

Agreed. I doubt such childish behaviour will cause anything other than laughter at the expense of Australians.


text:
User talk:MrrMaurii

-- 19:52, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:MrrMaurii


text:
User talk:Ilkin Gaziyev

-- 20:02, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ilkin Gaziyev


text:
User talk:Voldemorf

-- 20:22, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Voldemorf


text:
User talk:Smartnina

-- 20:24, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Smartnina


text:
User talk:Jsp722

-- 20:28, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jsp722


text:
User talk:Alexandre93230

-- 20:32, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Alexandre93230


text:
User talk:Meister Alucard

-- 20:48, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Meister Alucard


text:
User talk:Hamidrahmadi

-- 20:50, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hamidrahmadi


text:
User talk:Drakol

-- 20:52, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Drakol


text:
User talk:Cachoferrari

-- 20:53, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Cachoferrari


text:
User talk:Andi babe

-- 21:00, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Andi babe


text:
User talk:Smertrius

-- 21:25, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Smertrius


text:
User talk:Город Мечты

-- 21:42, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Город Мечты


text:
User talk:Porqueamitodo

-- 21:44, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Porqueamitodo


text:
User talk:Jammf

-- 21:50, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jammf


text:
User talk:Laylamel

-- 21:58, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Laylamel


text:
User talk:Marifer mala

-- 22:09, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Marifer mala


text:
User talk:Jscorrea00

-- 22:15, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jscorrea00


text:
User talk:Andrwcat58

-- 22:18, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Andrwcat58


text:
User talk:Awesomecool00

-- 22:25, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Awesomecool00


text:
User talk:EQWIKITIES

-- 22:58, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:EQWIKITIES


text:
User talk:Cityedge

-- 23:02, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Cityedge


text:
User talk:Bezwenalife

-- 23:17, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bezwenalife


text:
User talk:Yogisailorwoman

-- 23:27, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Yogisailorwoman


text:
User talk:Anneecox

-- 23:29, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Anneecox


text:
User talk:Antley

-- 23:54, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Antley


text:
User talk:Peppinorx

-- 00:13, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Peppinorx


text:
User talk:StAnselm

-- 00:57, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:StAnselm


text:
User talk:Semanathan23

-- 01:27, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Semanathan23


text:
User talk:Phamtunglam

-- 01:36, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Phamtunglam


text:
User talk:Costesseyboy

-- 01:43, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Costesseyboy


text:
User talk:Zedake

-- 02:13, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Zedake


text:
User talk:Jastman

-- 02:50, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jastman


text:
User talk:Thetakara

-- 02:58, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Thetakara


text:
User talk:Connerje

-- 03:01, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Connerje


text:
User talk:Maherite1977

-- 03:31, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Maherite1977


text:
User talk:Ungalnanban12

-- 03:49, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ungalnanban12


text:
Strikeforce Challengers 14 MMA Results

February 21, 2011

Veteran striker put an end to the undefeated streak of  in a close main event fight that went to the judges' decision at the Strikeforce Challengers 14 event at Cedar Park Center in Cedar Park, Texas on Friday night. Veteran fighter also prevailed in his Strikeforce debut against. , son of MMA legend, remained undefeated in his second-ever bout.

Lyle Beerbohm came into the main event bout with an undefeated 15-0-0 record, in addition to his 8-0-0 amateur record. "This is going to be a fun, tough, hard fight that I expect will go everywhere," stated Beerbohm in a pre-fight media workout on Wednesday. "There’ll be stand-up, wrestling, a little bit of everything. My time has come and I am really looking forward to the fight." Beerbohm also stated he wanted to eventually fight for a Lightweight title, but recognized that he first needed to move past his veteran opponent, Pat Healey, who came into the fight with a record of 25-17-0, who was making his return to action since his loss to  via submission in 2010.

The bout was very close, going the distance through all three rounds. While Beerbohm pushed a lot of the action, especially with grappling on the ground, Healey was able to land more effective strikes and weathered persistent take-down attempts from Beerbohm. The action was back-and-forth, neither fighter never able to clearly dominate the other. The last few minutes of the fight proved to be the best for Healey, who wore down Beerbohm's strength and left him gasping for air, allowing Healey to attempt more submissions on the ground. The three judges scored the bout 29-28, 29-28, and 29-28 to give Healey the unanimous decision win.

After the match, Beerbohm was upbeat, but felt he had won the bout. "I definitely thought I won. I thought going into the third we'd each won a round, but I definitely thought I won that last round. I took the fight to him from the start. But that's what happens when you let it go to the hands of the judges." Healey complimented his opponent, "Beerbohm fought a good fight but I think I outworked and outhustled him." Healey also welcomed the idea of a rematch, stating, "He talked a lot of trash, but if he wants a rematch, I’ll give him one anytime." Asked who he wanted to face next, Healey stated he wanted to fight the winner of the and  on March 5, noting that both fighters had previously defeated his brother, Pat Healey.

The co-main event for the show featured Carlo "Neo" Prater, a veteran fighter with a 25-10-1 record making his Strikeforce debut against the 14-3-0 Bryan Travers. The bout was over in just 38 seconds as Prater used his superior reach to jab Travers several times before using a trip to take Travers to the ground and submitting him with an Anaconda Choke. Prater showed a lot of emotion in his post-fight interview. "My record shows I’m not a perfect fighter, but when you’re down you get up," Prater said. "This was a good win, I’ll get better off this fight, but I’ll be right back in the gym soon."

Ryan Couture, the son of MMA legend Randy "the Nature" Couture, pushed his fight record to 2-0-0 with a victory over 2-0-0 opponent Lee Higgins. Most of the first round featured very little action until Higgins attempted to take down Couture, and found himself fighting off Guillotine Choke and a D'Arce Choke in the last minute of the round. Couture dominated nearly all of the second round with superior stand-up striking and ground control. Higgins fared little better in the third, as Couture was able to put Higgins against the cage and stop Higgins' take-down attempts, and then eventually control Higgins on the ground before submitting him with a Rear Naked Choke with 20 seconds left in the bout.

To round out the broadcast, Ryan Lawson (5-2-0) defeated (10-2-0) at 3:14 of Round 2 by Triangle Choke, and  (6-2-0) defeated Nick Gonzalez (16-8-0, 1 NC) at 1:05 of Round 1 by a Rear Naked Choke submission. The undercard results that were not broadcast, Drew Pendleton (2-0-0) defeated Dennis Dombrow (2-0-0) at 2:38 of Round 2 by Guillotine Choke submission, and Aaron Lanfranco (2-0-0) defeated (1-2-0) at 4:22 of Round 1 by Knockout.

The main card was broadcast in the United States on premium broadcast network. The Showtime  series highlights mixed martial arts fights between up-and-coming fighters as well as veteran fighters who are looking to move up towards the larger Strikeforce events.

title: Strikeforce Challengers 14 MMA Results


text:
User talk:Akki4reading

-- 04:08, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Akki4reading


text:
User talk:NoosaCat

-- 04:15, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:NoosaCat


text:
User talk:Existentialquestion

-- 04:43, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Existentialquestion


text:
User talk:Engr.rony

-- 04:47, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Engr.rony


text:
User talk:Prabu276

-- 04:48, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Prabu276


text:
User talk:Febycv

-- 05:03, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Febycv


text:
User talk:Enfcer

-- 05:05, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Indiana teen softball player recovering after lighting strike
Published. Congratulations! See the review comments, and. --Pi zero (talk) 00:03, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I thought I had done a decent job on my first article, then noticed how many edits you had done.  Guess I still have some ways to go on getting things down better. Enfcer (talk) 01:53, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

 * Heh. You did a more than decent job on your first article.  Your article passed on its first review; for a first effort, that's exemplary!

 * That said, yes, yes, learn! You've got a ways to go; we all do, and hopefully we never stop learning and improving on Wikinews.  That's why I've taught myself to break down my edits during review into small increments, to explain each change specifically in its edit summary, and allow each to be seen clearly by a diff.  My hope is that authors can learn lots by studying just what I did and why I said I was doing it (and perhaps I can learn from it, too).

 * As a rule, the better an article is, the easier it is to review. Yours was a pleasure to review, quite a contrast with what very many of our first-time contributors produce; you're one of two first-time contributors in recent times who actually did "Read The Fine Manual" before contributing.  I was also able to write review comments at a distinctly more sophisticated level than is usually fruitful with first-time contributors, because you were already at a much more sophisticated level than most of them.  Suggesting use of direct quotes from witnesses would be an absurd thing to bother saying to most newbies.  --Pi zero (talk) 02:53, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Congratulations!
Enfcer,

I just saw your first story up and I wanted to congratulate you! It was nice to see something about Indiana, too. There is a whole class of students here in Evansville writing news for Wikinews. Welcome, Crtew (talk) 00:20, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

 * Thank you, and that's cool. I had gotten bored with things on en.wiki, and was poking around some of the other projects, and stumbled across this one.  I am hoping to get the hang of things here, and start publishing more articles. Enfcer (talk) 01:55, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Great, I hope you like it here. Have fun, Crtew (talk) 03:12, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Minor
A very minor problem, and barely a problem at that: when you put the 'minimal' template on an article that's being developed, (the stolen Nazi prison uniform article) it bumps it (in the Newsroom) from 'In Development' to 'Disputed'......(which, when you think about it, is really a coding issue). While developing an article, I generally tend to do gobs of edits in getting it ready, so it often looks like poo while I'm doing that. The minimal template (thought this isn't a concrete requiremnt) would usually be put up by a reviewer. That's the usual flow. If I had (or anyone else had) changed it's status to "review" then your action would be alot more appropriate, because it wasn't anywhere close to being ready for review with what little bit I had up there. Wikinews is a great place and there's a bit of a learning curve regarding policy (and unwritten policy)....hang around.....you'll catch one. Keep contributing!! Bddpaux (talk) 20:48, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
 * When I had looked at it it had been close to two days with no other edits, and I thought that, that was the most appropriate tag. Since it had not been more then four days for the abandoned, and when I was looking at the deletion reasons, that seemed most appropriate. But like you said there is a bit of a learning curve, and I am trying to get the policies and such down. Enfcer (talk) 23:49, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Enfcer


text:
User talk:Vdrj2

-- 05:08, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Vdrj2


text:
User talk:Nhanbkvn

-- 05:12, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nhanbkvn


text:
User talk:Zahyun

-- 05:12, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Zahyun


text:
User talk:Sellyme

-- 06:03, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sellyme


text:
User talk:Shivaass

-- 06:30, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Shivaass


text:
User talk:Ив-Байдары

-- 06:31, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ив-Байдары


text:
User talk:Nagarji

-- 06:37, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nagarji


text:
User talk:Johardisum

-- 06:40, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Johardisum


text:
User talk:ArchangelMichael90

-- 07:01, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:ArchangelMichael90


text:
User talk:Paine Ellsworth

-- 07:04, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Paine Ellsworth


text:
User talk:Jcdanita

-- 07:28, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jcdanita


text:
User talk:Shahramsh

-- 07:32, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Shahramsh


text:
User talk:Beyond Awesome

-- 07:34, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Beyond Awesome


text:
User talk:Veeralayam jain Tirth

-- 07:38, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Veeralayam jain Tirth


text:
User talk:Sameerstarline

-- 07:44, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sameerstarline


text:
User talk:Youngworld85

-- 07:47, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Youngworld85


text:
User talk:Rubangeorge

-- 07:57, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rubangeorge


text:
User talk:Martinrusso~enwikinews

-- 08:06, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Martinrusso. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Martinrusso~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:21, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:34, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Martinrusso~enwikinews


text:
User talk:Katume

-- 08:24, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Katume


text:
User talk:Sandeep.s

-- 08:27, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sandeep.s


text:
User talk:LoveDemon143

-- 08:48, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:LoveDemon143


text:
User talk:Iljia

-- 09:09, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Iljia


text:
User talk:Nobleness of Mind

-- 09:16, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nobleness of Mind


text:
User talk:Hariehkr

-- 09:29, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hariehkr


text:
User talk:Adminege

-- 09:29, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Adminege


text:
User talk:Capsot

-- 09:32, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Capsot


text:
User talk:Cosmas Smirnov

-- 09:57, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Cosmas Smirnov


text:
User talk:Greenlights~enwikinews

-- 09:58, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Greenlights. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Greenlights~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:15, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:31, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Greenlights~enwikinews


text:
User talk:YANARDAG

-- 10:14, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:YANARDAG


text:
User talk:Özge aydın

-- 10:19, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Özge aydın


text:
User talk:Ervis Abazovski

-- 10:24, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ervis Abazovski


text:
User talk:Cjdiersen

-- 10:28, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Cjdiersen


text:
User talk:Beagno

-- 10:35, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Beagno


text:
User talk:Jay baidya

-- 10:40, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jay baidya


text:
User talk:Viviana80

-- 10:43, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Viviana80


text:
User talk:Rajkamalbauddh

-- 10:45, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rajkamalbauddh


text:
User talk:Swanage

-- 10:52, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your friendly welcome! --Swanage (talk) 10:53, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Swanage


text:
User talk:Pouyesh bakhsheshi

-- 11:14, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Pouyesh bakhsheshi


text:
User talk:Beko

-- 11:25, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Beko


text:
User talk:Prisoner40

-- 11:43, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Prisoner40


text:
User talk:Tamhminh

-- 11:44, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tamhminh


text:
User talk:Marietaestevez

-- 11:56, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Marietaestevez


text:
User talk:Gavin.perch

-- 12:13, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gavin.perch


text:
User talk:Makmureffendi

-- 12:17, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Makmureffendi


text:
Thread:Comments:Australian town to change name to promote road safety/not too bad/reply

Not really. The scary pictures on cigarrete packets scare the heck out of non-smokers but make smokers want to smoke even more.


text:
User talk:Freakyzoidberg

-- 12:26, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Freakyzoidberg


text:
User talk:Mekem~enwikinews

-- 12:29, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Mekem. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Mekem~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:18, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:34, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mekem~enwikinews


text:
User talk:HeavyRain

-- 12:42, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:HeavyRain


text:
User talk:Jesuly10 95

-- 12:44, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jesuly10 95


text:
User talk:Shankar ram1998

-- 13:02, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Shankar ram1998


text:
User talk:روخو

-- 13:22, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:روخو


text:
User talk:Cadete0973

-- 13:26, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Cadete0973


text:
User talk:Douglas1982

-- 13:39, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Douglas1982


text:
User talk:Swiftcom

-- 13:40, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Swiftcom


text:
User talk:Erico Tachizawa

-- 13:47, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Erico Tachizawa


text:
User talk:Aditya100

-- 13:48, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Aditya100


text:
User talk:Mmavkvba

-- 13:49, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mmavkvba


text:
Thread:Comments:Yale University builds world's first anti-laser/Comments from feedback form - "110 micrometers wide....should..."

110 micrometers wide....should this have been nanometers or microns?


text:
User talk:ElectroStatic Jolt

-- 14:13, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:ElectroStatic Jolt


text:
Thread:Comments:Yale University builds world's first anti-laser/Comments from feedback form - "110 micrometers wide....should..."/reply

Neither, as you would have learned had you followed the link - which is provided for this very purpose.


text:
User talk:Nguyễn Quyết Tâm

-- 14:26, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nguyễn Quyết Tâm


text:
User talk:Nirbhay yadav

-- 14:26, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nirbhay yadav


text:
User talk:Dolev.talya

-- 14:34, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dolev.talya


text:
User talk:JudayArry

-- 15:03, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:JudayArry


text:
User talk:Steffan 95

-- 15:07, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Steffan 95


text:
User talk:Dan221094

-- 15:07, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dan221094


text:
User talk:Kentyan1111

-- 15:25, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kentyan1111


text:
User talk:Anushe.ahmed

-- 15:27, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Anushe.ahmed


text:
User talk:Kcthejas.1

-- 15:29, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kcthejas.1


text:
User talk:Crisco 1492

-- 15:40, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Crisco 1492


text:
User talk:Zup Arkhen

-- 15:42, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Zup Arkhen


text:
User talk:Простотак

-- 15:48, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Простотак


text:
User talk:Dinosaurioec

-- 15:51, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dinosaurioec


text:
User talk:Miha99.99

-- 15:58, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Miha99.99


text:
User talk:Zl1com

-- 15:59, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Zl1com


text:
User talk:Jannes.coetzee

-- 16:03, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jannes.coetzee


text:
User talk:Michealganly

-- 16:21, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Michealganly


text:
User talk:Nenetouti

-- 16:22, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nenetouti


text:
User talk:Chilegg hè nakakata

-- 16:28, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Chilegg hè nakakata


text:
User talk:Thierry3474

-- 16:33, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Thierry3474


text:
User talk:Israel vaincra

-- 16:34, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Israel vaincra


text:
User talk:Doublen101

-- 16:51, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Doublen101


text:
User talk:Salvatorescuderi

-- 16:52, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Salvatorescuderi


text:
User talk:KhalidQasrawi

-- 17:00, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:KhalidQasrawi


text:
Guatemalan football executive shot dead after team meeting

February 20, 2011

A Guatemalan football executive has been shot dead after he left a team meeting in the town of. vice-president Carlos Noe Gomez was killed by two men waiting for him as he left after the meeting. Several weeks before the shooting Gomez reported being threatened.

Gomez started receiving the death threats weeks before the shooting over the poor performence of Deportivo Xinabajul. Xinabajul currently lies at the bottom of. The club also suffered a 2–0 defeat to earlier in the week.

The Guatemalan national football league spoke out against the shooting asking for the investigation to be "serious and profound". Prosecutor Nery Martinez released a statement saying that the investigation will be focusing on the death threats Gomez received from fans.

The shooting of Gomez comes four months after the discovery of the body of Carlos Mercedes Vasquez, a footballer who played for. He had been killed and chopped up, the note left by his body stated that he had been killed after he was "messing with other women."


text:
User talk:Sultancatalin

-- 17:06, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sultancatalin


text:
User talk:Lucascream

-- 17:10, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lucascream


text:
User talk:Juhobui

-- 17:12, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Juhobui


text:
User talk:Jalgonm

-- 17:20, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jalgonm


text:
User talk:WikimanOD

-- 17:27, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:WikimanOD


text:
User talk:Deniz buse

-- 17:40, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Deniz buse


text:
User talk:Mustafa Haidar

-- 18:10, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mustafa Haidar


text:
User talk:C9G6SI8J

-- 18:23, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:C9G6SI8J


text:
User talk:Mattisse

Thank you for the recent comments
Mattisse, thank you for the recent comments and for your gestures of good faith. I really appreciate that. A lot. ;) Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 03:01, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Weiner article
My apologies for abruptly pulling back the article. Were you about to review? I'm going to update the article shortly with new developments. Cheers, Ragettho (talk) 16:56, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
 * No, I am not a reviewer. I was updating the article, but I will step back if you are doing it. I didn't mean to step on you toes. My apologies! Mattisse (talk) 17:00, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
 * No, it's my fault. The article isn't "mine" per se, and it was wrong of me to assume that you were editing in a reviewer capacity. In any case, I invite you to continue updating the article! :) Ragettho (talk) 17:10, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

I'm not quite sure what new info you had in mind, so would you like to revise the article now? I'll stand back and edit once your done, and by then we'll probably have more info from the news conference. Ragettho (talk) 17:35, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for helping out with the article! I also really liked this comment you left on the talk page. I agree that if we strived for articles with a broader focus, then that would go a long way in attracting more readers to the site. Ragettho (talk) 21:37, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Well that was a really hectic and challenging piece of work! :) But I think it was worth it. Although you are right that the article was about to become stale in the US, I also agree with Blood Red Sandman's view that our broader international audience would appreciate the article we wrote. As for your other comments, there were certainly many alternative angles and perspectives to consider as we wrote the article, but at the end of the day we really can't cover them all. Hopefully we can improve when we work on the next big story.

In any case, I really enjoyed working on this article with you. I think that I've learned a lot about refocusing an article on what's really important, rather than pure sensationalism. For this reason I have "poured you tea". (I stumbled across the page a few days ago, and I think that it's a fascinating yet often ignored concept.) Enjoy!

Best, Ragettho (talk) 19:18, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

 * Thanks! I enjoyed working with you too, and appreciate your flexibility and adaptiveness as the focus of the article changed. And thanks for the tea! Best wishes, Mattisse (talk) 19:33, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

edit conflict on FTC/Google article
My sincerest apologies for the edit conflict. I didn't realize a page move would cause a conflict like that! :( Did you lose a lot of edits? Ragettho (talk) 18:34, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Genocide article
I gave a lengthy reply on my talk; but, a short version of what I said is that you're free to transfer extra bits accross to the other article, and I'd be pleased if that happens. Redirecting's always going to happen at some point, as that preserves the history, but doing so doesn't preclude a merge. Hope that helps. Side-note: I'm very glad to see how industrious you're being now you're back to working in mainspace! :) Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 22:50, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I hope I did it ok, as my article contained everything the other did and more. I worked so hard on it to make it as perfect as I could. Feel free to tell me of my mistakes.  Mattisse (talk) 23:09, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I've not written many wikinews article so I suppose that despite my own hard work, it was less than "perfect". Apologies for such a "bad" and "misleading" title (although, actually, many people following these events have heard of the former minister's name). I'll know better next time. --Belovedfreak (talk) 09:58, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
 * That was more of an obliteration than a merge. Not a trace of the original remained, despite the fact it contained details yours did not. I think I managed to pick them all out and re-add them. The idea of a merge is to preserve the best of both articles, but so far as I can see you just copy-pasted yours accross and deleted the text that was there in the first place. As a tip which just came to mind as I typed: if you're merging a longer article to a shorter one, it may be easiest to take details from the shorter one and put them in a copy of the longer one - then paste the whole lot accross. That may be an easier way of not overlooking details; something I wish I'd thought of years ago!
 * Something that seems to have been lost in communication - which I apologise for - is that when I talked of redirecting, I was trying to explain why yours was redirected, and reassure you that it didn't mean your work was lost. But, no harm done there.
 * Anyway, the key thing is that now as far as I can tell all details from both are now present and sighted for display to the public; what you might describe as the WN version of a happy ending.
 * One thing I recall you saying before was the enjoyment had been lost for you. Now that you're getting stuck right in to some very difficult pieces, would you say that you're enjoying it? A big hope in offering to mentor was to re-establish that. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 11:48, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

 * There is a gadget called "On screen edit" that might be useful for this sort of merge; I would certainly use it (of course, I'm already used to the gadget :-). The gadget turns a copy of a mainspace article, in a particular browser tab, into a "scratch copy" that you can shade parts of, as if you were using colored highlighters on passages on a hardcopy page.  (I use it when reviewing articles, marking verified passages in one color, factual errors in another, copyvios in another.)  The scratch copy can't be saved, which is great because you don't have to worry about accidentally saving it on-wiki — though you do have to be careful to keep that browser tab continuously on the version you're on-screen-editing, until you're ready to throw away that scratch copy.  --Pi zero (talk) 13:37, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I'd like to try that but I could not find it in the "Gadgets" list under "Preferences". How do I implement it? Mattisse (talk) 13:54, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
 * There's a section under the gadgets tab called "Reviewing articles" — which you may have overlooked because it sure doesn't sound inviting to a non-reviewer, but I don't think any of the gadgets listed there actually require the reviewer bit. It's the last of the four in that section.  (It ended up in that section because Bawolff kindly created the gadget for me in response to a water cooler discussion of how to peer-review.)  --Pi zero (talk) 14:22, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
 * ok, thanks! I checked it. Mattisse (talk) 17:18, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

My pleasure
Thanks for you nice comment on my talk page, it was my pleasure reading that article. Robert Beck (talk) 17:06, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
 * You are very welcome! Mattisse (talk) 17:09, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

US Supreme Court rules video games are protected speech
What is your opinion on the request to rename the page at Talk:US Supreme Court rules video games are protected speech?--William S. Saturn (talk) 19:49, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

 * Isn't that what it is already named, or am I confused?  Mattisse (talk) 21:07, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I was linking to the talk page where the user made the request.--William S. Saturn (talk) 21:12, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for rewriting my article. That was very kind of you. I have to admit that I'm disappointed that my version couldn't make it to being published. Your English is better though, so I'll just leave the article like that. Thank you again! -- Petru Dimitriu (talk) 19:21, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Reviewer?
Hey Mattisse! I was surprised to realize that you're not a reviewer! Would you accept a nomination? I think you've done really well with writing your own articles and copyediting those of others. Ragettho (talk) 16:49, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

 * Thanks for the offer! Let me think about it. Mattisse (talk) 17:07, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Absolutely. Take your time. :) Ragettho (talk) 06:19, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

 * Yes I hope you accept this. I will definitely support.--William S. Saturn (talk) 19:04, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your kind words. Every time you edit an article I've written I see what a bad writer I am!  Mattisse (talk) 20:37, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
 * No no, a bad writer wouldn't have been able to write so many great articles.--William S. Saturn (talk) 23:57, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

China’s consumer prices rise to a three-year high in June as food prices soar 14.4%
I was a little worried that if you were in the middle of composing an edit, I might rename it out from under you. Apologies if so. --Pi zero (talk) 22:10, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

South Sudan gains independence Hi Matisse! Just about "..At 0000 EAT Saturday (2100 UTC Friday)..". I see at the moment there are 2 pending changes about the owner of the midnight.What does this midnight belong to? Friday or Saturday? I would see it exactly as the last istant of Friday. What is your opinion? Thank a lot in advance! 217.202.98.31 (talk) 16:48, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I didn't write that part, and some foreign language sources, where it came from, have been removed. Since the English sources just say at midnight, without specifying, perhaps that would be good enough, since it was midnight local time.  Mattisse (talk) 17:01, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

'bundlers' article
Please just leave it as it is now. I'll see if I can review the article as if the changes wheren't there, and if so, I can just pull the changes myself and publish.

I'm going to assume the extra names are the only thing verified from the NYT source; I can't access NYT articles. --Pi zero (talk) 18:59, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

 * Yes, all I added were three names from the NYTimes article. I can email you the text of the NYTimes article if you want. Mattisse (talk) 19:13, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

Note
Don't get too worked up by PiZero's comment. Your work is very much appreciated here.--William S. Saturn (talk) 22:57, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your encouragement. I'm really on the verge of ditching it. Your words definitely help. Mattisse (talk) 23:06, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Another note
Earlier you mentioned not being able to find the ArbCom cases somewhere (but I don't exactly recall where or when for that matter). See Requests for arbitration. — Mike moral  ♪♫  07:28, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much as I searched and searched and couldn't find anything! Mattisse (talk) 14:16, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Lizards are capable of problem-solving, study shows Hi Mattisse!Great article as usual! Just about the sentence:"..The Puerto Rican lizard...known to excel at foraging food by being acutely aware of movement...". What movement is involved here?The Puerto Rican lizard's movement or perhaps the movement of insects hunted while looking for food? Thanks a lot in advance! 2.193.82.198 (talk) 16:37, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks for the question and for letting me know that you liked the article! The lizards are known to be acutely aware of the movements of their prey. Scientists didn't expect that lizards would also be so acutely aware of color that they could learn so fast to distinguish which color cap the worm was under. (I should have been more clear in my writing.) Best wishes, Mattisse (talk) 16:59, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

WP articles vs WN articles
Wikipedia articles may be longer than Wikinews articles, but a Wikinews article has to be completed, factchecked, copyedited, and peer reviewed within 2 days of an event happening (within a single hour is the ultimate goal though). On Wikipedia the same process occurs over months, if not years. There is no pressure on Wikipedia because of this. No pressure = no stress. No stress = no burnout. *That* is the reason why creating news content has such a high burnout rate in comparison to historical content. There is no deadline when you're writing history, but there is one when writing about current events. Gopher65talk 01:24, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I realize that the time limit may cause some editors stress, although the worse stress is that of seeing your article fail to get reviewed in time and having to search everyday for updates to prevent it from becoming stale. On Wikipedia the standards are so much higher and the quality of prose is also much higher. Plus an article must be complete, while on wikinews, with a little effort, a wikinews article could be less superficial but usually the superficiality of the article is not held against it. In fact, I was told originally that an wikinews article with more than two sources would have a hard time getting reviewed.

 * I don't thing the very stressful task of getting an article through FAC in the time allotted can be compared with writing an article on wikinews. FAC = time limit = many criticisms from many reviewers that have to be resolved in a short period of time in a long, comprehensive article that may have 200 citations or more. Writing a wikinews articles from two sources is, in my view, not difficult or stressful. The stress comes from the lack of AGF and the difficulty with 150 reviewers, to find one even willing to look at the article. I see so many go stale. I have been very lucky to have published so many in such a short time. But the writing of the article has been enjoyable and not stressful. Respectfully, Mattisse (talk) 01:43, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mattisse


text:
User talk:Samir907

-- 18:28, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Samir907


text:
Ten children killed in Estonian orphanage fire

February 20, 2011

Ten children have died after a fire at a disabled orphanage in, Estonia. Forty six people, including thirty seven children, were in the wooden building at the time of the fire. One adult and another child were injured in the blaze. The fire started at 2.30pm local time and firefighters arrived shortly after.

Viktor Saaremets, a spokesman for the, released a statement saying "By the time rescue workers and firefighters arrived at the scene three or four minutes later the building was completely in flames." According to local media it took the firefighters two hours to put out the blaze.

The Estonian government has declared Monday a national day of mourning for the victims after an emergency meeting. President of Estonia said "The tragic accident in the Haapsalu orphanage shocked the whole of Estonia today."

The orphanage was opened in 1950 but moved to the current building in 1996 after funding from the Estonian government as well as foreign donors. The building was inspected in January and met all the necessary requirements according to Saaremets. The cause of the fire is still being investigated.


text:
User talk:Tanyr013

-- 18:36, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tanyr013


text:
User talk:Cbossay

-- 18:43, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Cbossay


text:
User talk:Arjun4084346

-- 18:58, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Arjun4084346


text:
User talk:Markeilert

-- 19:20, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Markeilert


text:
User talk:AniMakc

-- 19:25, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:AniMakc