text: User talk:SMARIOSYOSHI64

title: User talk:SMARIOSYOSHI64


text: User talk:Keahapana

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: User talk:Keahapana


text: User talk:A7x

title: User talk:A7x


text: User talk:Agowilt

title: User talk:Agowilt


text: User talk:Ukgamer

title: User talk:Ukgamer


text: User talk:Hanlee73

title: User talk:Hanlee73


text: User talk:Bestact

title: User talk:Bestact


text:
Alex Reid wins UK's Celebrity Big Brother 2010

January 30, 2010

Mixed martial arts fighter Alex Reid, nicknamed "The Reidenator", has been voted the winner of UK Celebrity Big Brother 2010. He won what is the last series of the programme in the final on Friday night, having received 65.9% of the votes from the public.

Musician Dane Bowers finished in second place, while Vinnie Jones, a former British soccer player and now a film actor, came in third place. After his departure from the Big Brother house, he commented about Alex: "I taught him everything I know." Vinnie had become unpopular with fans as he was said to have been bossy to other celebrities inside the house. Speaking to presenter Davina McCall, he stated: "I was just trying to keep order in the house because a lot of people were selfish. I was just trying to keep some stability in the house."

Musician Jonas Altberg, better known by his stage name Basshunter, finished in fourth place. Actress Stephanie Beacham left the Big Brother house in fifth place.

Alex Reid has been the girlfriend to former glamour model Katie Price since July 2009. Fellow housemate Dane has also previously been Katie's boyfriend. When Davina McCall mentioned Price during the interview with Alex, the crowd gave out a negative reaction of booing. In response, he said: "Come on guys, don't do that. I'm sorry guys... I'm not sorry, I really love Katie Price."

During the interview with Davina McCall, Alex commented about his victory. He said: "What an amazing, fantastic start to a new year. Vinnie has been very inspirational to me. He's transitioned from athletic to actor, which is what I want to do. I'm not getting booed now. That's amazing... I'm speechless. My whole agenda in here was to be myself." Alex also spoke of contestant Dane. "I was surprised by what a cool dude he is. I'm really looking forward to seeing more of Dane," Alex said.


text: User talk:Branbrab34

title: User talk:Branbrab34


text: User talk:Tx2009

title: User talk:Tx2009


text: User talk:Jimsteele9999

title: User talk:Jimsteele9999


text: User talk:Jdjd2010

title: User talk:Jdjd2010


text: User talk:Malcolm kravit

title: User talk:Malcolm kravit


text:
Pentagon proposes Taiwanese arms sale

January 30, 2010

The US Department of Defense has notified Congress of a potential arms sale to Taiwan, with a value of $6 billion, that was first pledged by the Bush administration.

The deal, that would include helicopters and anti-missile defences, angered China, who stated that the move would "seriously damage" US–China relations, as Beijing considers the island to be a break-away province of China, having split away after civil war in 1949.

There is a stand-off between China and Taiwan. China has a large number of weapons aimed at Taiwan, and has threatened to use them in the past. Taiwan denounces this, warning that, if 1,500 missiles were not removed, relations between the two nations would deteriorate.

The act of notifying Congress is a legal requirement and does not mean that the sale will go ahead. A thirty-day deadline is in place for politicians to decide on the proposition before it goes ahead. In a statement, the Pentagon listed the items being negotiated over, including 114 Patriot missiles and sixty helicopters. It will also include two minesweepers. The US is the main arms supplier for Taiwan.

General James L. Jones, the National Security Advisor for the Obama administration, said that China had been fully consulted about the deal. "We all recognise that there are certain things that countries will do periodically that may not make everybody completely happy," he stated. However, he maintained that the US was "bent towards a new relationship" between themselves and China.

A spokesman for the Chinese embassy in Washington, D.C., Wang Baodong, said yesterday that the arms sale was a "gross intervention into China's internal affairs". He went on to assert that the trade "seriously endangers China's national security".

Ties between the United States and China, already stretched by the recent row over internet censorship, in which Google threatened to withdraw its presence in the country, have been strained by the announcement. China maintains, according to a press release on 22 January, that the Internet in their country is "open", with the "most vibrant" sites based in China. Beijing wishes the United States to "respect each other's core interest", and to "ensure the healthy stable development" of their relationship.

title: Pentagon proposes Taiwanese arms sale


text: User talk:Zimblood

title: User talk:Zimblood


text:
Comments:Tony Blair tells Iraq Inquiry he would invade again

Should Tony Blair be considered a war criminal?
NO! Saddam was the war criminal. And it seem we are forgetting that the Syrian and Iranian back terrorist groups are the true war criminals. How many times they attack places of worshiped? Women raped and murder for having a right to a opinion. How many lives they destroyed because someone want to vote? It drives me up the wall when someone call Bush and Blair a war criminal when they do the impossible and gave a Muslim country a democracy. If it was up to me I would give them the Noble Peace prize.--KDP3 (talk) 00:19, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * They're all war criminals. One of the things the UN was set up for was to deal with this universally. --Brian McNeil / talk 00:21, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

 * The UN was having back rooms deals with Saddam. Remember Oil for Food. How that worked out.--KDP3 (talk) 00:23, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Personally, I feel that there was no need for a war. Saddam's regime was bad, but all we have done is compound the problem. 179 British military deaths, plus goodness knows how many Iraqi war deaths or deaths as a result of post-war insurgency are simply additions to the problem. We should have stuck with diplomatic sanctions and let the Iraqis sort themselves out. They posed no direct threat to us, after all. At the very least, we should have waited for a further UN resolution. I'm not sure whether Blair should be considered a war criminal—that seems a bit too harsh—but he should not have sent us to war. Den dodge  T\C 00:29, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

 * The issue on handing the war is my biggest problem. But Iran and Syria used it as a proxy war to expanded there influences over Iraq and stomped out any chance of a Democracy movement in the Middle East.--KDP3 (talk) 00:32, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

 * "Oil for Food" was only corrupted because there were corruptible western businessmen involved. It was natural that Saddam would try and manipulate the programme to obtain embargoed materials. What disgusts me most is that there was absolutely no Al Quaeda in Iraq before the war. Which dimbulbs in military planning or the CIA didn't see that coming? They created a power vacuum, failed to work to fill it, and so badly damaged infrastructure that there were ample opportunities for terrorist organisations to set up and recruit. Blair's claim to have made the world safer flies in the face of the facts. History will not judge him kindly, no matter how much "Ferning" he gets. --Brian McNeil / talk 00:47, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

 * I agree after the Liberation of Iraq that Bush dropped the ball. But calling them war criminals when it was the suicided bombers trained by terrorist are the true war criminals. --KDP3 (talk) 00:54, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * If you make only the people who are "worst" the war criminals, it defeats the whole point of justice. The law should apply to everyone evenly. (Note i havn't read the evidence that they are/are not war criminals, so i'm not making a judgment as to if they are at the moment, I'm just saying that saying that they're not war criminals because there are worst people out there is like saying its that murdering a single person is ok, because there are serial killers out there who murder lots of people. 2 wrongs don't make a right). Bawolff ☺☻ 01:03, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Engaging in a war not sanctioned under international law is a war crime. So, you could add Putin to the list for some of his actions. In case you've a short memory, a Belgian court accepted the submission of evidence that Bush, Cheney, and Blair were war criminals and issued warrants for them to be arrested and brought before the court.
 * I have absolutely no idea what that fucktard Bush thought he was doing - "Mission Accomplished" banners on aircraft carriers, and sundry cretinous stupidity. The utter lack of post-war planning was, itself, a crime against humanity. Any particularly respectable student of Middle-Eastern affairs could have made quite clear that what we have today was the inevitable outcome of ill-judged adventurism. --Brian McNeil / talk 01:09, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

 * It sad don't you think liberating people is a war crime.--KDP3 (talk) 01:11, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

 * (double edit conflict)They are both war criminals. I would tend to agree with you that the war crimes comitted by elements within Iraq were worse, but that does not suddenly make Blair and Bush's war crimes acceptable. If they wanted to bring peace, there were legal avenues. They could have gone via the UN Security Council for permission to use force and put in place a plan to deal with the country afterwards - all dealt with within the legal framework. Bush and Blair have breached international law and should be imprisioned for it. Bush is questionable, but Blair can be prosecuted in the United Kingdom and has breached the legislation as it stands. I'm not just shooting off about this; I have the considered opinion of a British lawyer on that one. One who has prosecuted criminals and then moved on to defending them. The UK can prosecute under local jurisdiction for breaches of international war crimes legislation conducted within the UK - i.e., a war involving Britain. Based on that, I would expect Bush to be prosecutable in the UK as well; I shall check if legal basis exists for an extradition and trial. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 01:12, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

 * Wow people think the UN worked? Look at Sudan and other nations the UN is in. Bush and Blair decision to liberate Iraq right the wrongs of the UN torrence of dictatorships.--KDP3 (talk) 01:16, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

 * Both Bush and Blair are as responsible as anyone else in the UN for that. As permanent members of the Security Council, they had the power to see that tolerance quashed legally. The political will was never there. Equally, the position on the council allows the UK and US to invade Iraq legally with little opposition - yet they did not. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 01:22, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Ah, yes, the old USian standby; blame the UN. Americans have zero right to criticise it until they pay their dues. Yes, it is a flawed organisation; but, it is what we've got as the supposed international forum to deal with such issues. Dictators? Again, not a point to bring up in association with America; there is a long, shameful list of brutal right-wing scumbags who had full US support. That's support at the UN, in suppressing a free press, in "disappearing" people, and jailing, torturing, and killing any human rights or pro-democracy activists.
 * The United States has no moral authority to speak on the subject of dictators; they only support democracy when it is politically convenient. --Brian McNeil / talk 01:27, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Well I'd learn one thing today, liberalism really loved their socialist dictators like Saddam. But silly me for thanking Bush and Blair for giving Iraq a democratic government which every single person here is ignored.--KDP3 (talk) 01:55, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

 * Because it is beside the point. Actually, I haven't ignored it - I pointed out that easy, legal routes were open to invade to do that if they wanted, but the legal options were ignored in favour of criminal ones. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 02:00, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

 * Saddam wasn't a socialist, and, despite your indoctrination, that is not a dirty word or an insult. Some of us remember the full-on support the US gave Saddam when he was fighting Iran; perhaps if that folly had not been engaged in then the Iranians would be less actively hostile towards the US.
 * Right, or left, I oppose the suppression of human rights as I mentioned above in relation to America's "selective" support for democracy. Undoubtedly, Saddam engaged in many of the same brutal practices as America's friendly South-American dictators. Two wrongs don't make a right [But three lefts do!] --Brian McNeil / talk 02:12, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Saddam is probably best described as a Stalinist. The Ba'ath Party was also very nationalistic, esp. concerning pan-Arabism and such. --SVTCobra 02:37, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * That's fairly accurate - as long as you remember Stalin wasn't really a Communist; it was just convenient to have the label there for propaganda use against the populace who'd supported the revolution based on Marx' works. Marx was against it; his theory, which he later admitted was fatally flawed, was that Communism would be a natural progression for well-developed and industrialised countries. The serious injustices he saw in free-market capitalism still exist today; however, his grandiose idea took too little account of humans' natural propensity towards selfishness. --Brian McNeil / talk 03:23, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Yep, Stalin was no purist for Communism. However, human's "natural propensity towards selfishness" might be what's preventing us all from becoming suicide bombers seeking "the greater goood". --SVTCobra 03:37, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Saddam wasn't a socialist. Technically, however, Blair was, and Brown is. The Labour Party's manifestp describes it as a "socialist" party. You cannot come here supporting Blair, and then go around slinging the word "socialist" around as if it were some kind of dirty insult. Den dodge  T\C 10:14, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Ah, I think I'll need to get a bumper sticker made up to further upset conservative fundies who've been brainwashed by McCarthy's descendants; "Jesus was a Socialist". --Brian McNeil / talk 10:37, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Time for the international criminal court to step in and sort things out - illegalalities of the war, and the uk's possession of trident as a weapon of mass destruction.

This is all so ridiculous...
I loved it when Blair hand-waved U.S. and British possession of WMD's by stating they're not aggressive, so it's ok... when it wasn't too long ago in a relative historical sense that "the sun never set on the British empire", and I don't think any nation in the world has been engaged in anywhere near as much military action as the U.S. over the last century... not to mention the U.S. is still the only nation in the world to have actually used nuclear weapons on a civilian population.

How do people get away with spouting so much hypocrisy and so deeply insulting the intelligence of the very people they're supposed to be serving? It blows my mind. Why aren't we swarming government buildings by the millions and demanding decency? I guess it's because we're all too busy working so we can pay taxes to support their greed and sadism, and hopefully keep our families fed and sheltered while they don't have a care in the world.

That is "democracy", Im sorry to say. as far as Politics are concrened, the U.S GOvernment is Far more of a Plutocratic Ogliarchy than an actual democracy. No One rebels because no one rebels against "Benevolence". So Long as their are gullible people to belive the government is still as the constitution describd, and so long people are willing to take the easy way out, it will continue. Guatamala is the way it is because of CIA backed Coups overthrowing their democratically elected leader to instal a dictator with U.S intrests at heart. Yet most people dont know this. Its no HIDDEN informaion or anything, but it certainly isnt taught in school. The world is at the beck and call of the almighty dollar, And far too many "conservative" regimes have fallen under it. 164.116.47.180 (talk) 17:52, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Teflon Tony does it again.
This week former Prime Minister Tony Blair faced six hours of questioning by the Chilcott Inquiry to which he gave little in the way of concrete answers.

What we got in their place was another consummate performance from the great ‘actor manager’ of British politics. Every last detail from his tone of voice to the way he folded his hands was perfectly controlled, if they gave an Oscar for political mendacity he would have been presented with it at the end of his testimony.

If Tony Blair was haunted by doubts over its legality before he took Britain to war in 2003 or guilt at its awful consequences in service men and women killed and maimed by enemy fire not a trace of it showed in his faultless public persona. In common with all the most accomplished con artists he is able to lie plausibly because he is able to convince himself that he is telling the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

However loudly the protesters shouted and waved their Bliar placards the man himself has stepped clear of the wreckage yet again. Things will not go so well for his successor when he gives evidence to the inquiry, for all his faults Gordon Brown is blessed with one significant virtue, unlike Teflon Tony he has a conscience.

Adam Colclough, Staffordshire,UK

Why should the US and the UK force democracy onto people?

Comments from feedback form - "This is a fair and thorough re..."
This is a fair and thorough report, almost enjoyable. . . Blair goes on. . .? —82.132.249.56 (talk) 08:26, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Yes


text: User talk:Aboky

title: User talk:Aboky


text: User talk:Sale79

title: User talk:Sale79


text: User talk:Mehmetgozum

title: User talk:Mehmetgozum


text: User talk:Craniul morti

title: User talk:Craniul morti


text: User talk:D2306

title: User talk:D2306


text: User talk:Frank fynn

title: User talk:Frank fynn


text: User talk:Amazingamazing

title: User talk:Amazingamazing


text: User talk:Tsurutoshi

title: User talk:Tsurutoshi


text: User talk:Havenner

title: User talk:Havenner


text: User talk:Dasherman343

title: User talk:Dasherman343


text: User talk:Ncode rizky

title: User talk:Ncode rizky


text: User talk:Gailandzoo

title: User talk:Gailandzoo


text:
User talk:82.196.41.196

Welcome
, welcome to Wikinews! Thank You for posting your comments on articles. Did you know that you can also write articles for Wikinews? If you choose to help Wikinews by writing articles the links below might be helpful:

Our key policies - if you read anything, read these! Here a few pointers to help you get to know Wikinews: There are always things to do on Wikinews: By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and Comment pages using four tildes ( ~~~~ ), which produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, you can ask them at the water cooler or to anyone on the Welcommittee, or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome!  The New  Mikemoral  ♪♫ 02:00, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Neutral point of view - tell every side to a story in a fair and balanced way
 * Cite sources - everything in a Wikinews article must be sourced
 * Introduction - overview of the site
 * Writing an article - how to write and publish a complete article
 * Content guide - what's suitable for Wikinews
 * Style guide - how articles should look before publishing
 * Contents - the contents page.
 * Existing articles need expanding and checking for spelling and mistakes
 * The front page lead articles often need updating
 * Developing stories need finishing and publishing
 * Discussions need your input
 * Audio Wikinews could always use more contributors
 * And of course, stories need writing!

title: User talk:82.196.41.196


text:
User talk:Diego pmc

Welcome
 The New  Mikemoral  ♪♫ 02:01, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

title: User talk:Diego pmc


text:
Comments:US economy grows at fastest pace in six years

Based on my perception as a US citizen. And the large amount of incorrect data the Obama Administration has spewed out, I highly doubt this is true. 74.166.95.229 (talk) 02:24, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * What sectors of the US economy are you qualified to speak on as not tying in to these figures? And, do you have any specific examples of "incorrect data" as you put it? --Brian McNeil / talk 02:34, 30 January 2010 (UTC)


text:
Toyota recalls up to 1.8 million automobiles

January 30, 2010 The automobile manufacturer Toyota has said that it will recall up to 1.8 million cars across Europe, after a problem with the accelerator pedal was discovered.

According to the firm, eight models were affected by the problem — AYGO, iQ, Yaris, Auris, Corolla, Verso, Avensis, and RAV4 — after it was discovered that the accelerator may become stuck in a depressed position, resulting in uncontrollable speeding.

On Thursday, Toyota said it would recall 1.1 million cars in the US; a day previous, it had suspended eight models from sales. Last week, 2.3 million cars in the US were recalled due to the pedal issues.

The chief executive of Toyota Motor Europe commented on the recall. "We understand that the current situation is creating concerns and we deeply regret it," said Tadashi Arashima. The firm, however, noted that it wasn't aware of any accidents resulted by the malfunctioning accelerator pedals, and not many pedal problem incidents were reported in Europe. "The potential accelerator pedal issue only occurs in very rare circumstances," Arashima added.

The National Automobile Dealers Association, meanwhile, commented that Toyota showrooms could lose as much as US$2.47 billion worth of revenue due to the incident.

"Toyota veterans will likely hear the news with disbelief and keep faith in the brand, but new customers could definitely be scared off," remarked Robert Rademacher, who is the president of the trade group ZDK, as quoted by Business Week. "This recall has a dimension which we've never seen before."

There are concerns that the problem may result in reduced consumer trust in Toyota. Hans-Peter Wodniok, an analyst for Fairesearch GmbH & Co. in Germany, noted: "If this is a one-time event, huge as it is, Toyota may be forgiven. But if something happens again in the next months and years, they will have gambled away customer trust in Europe as well."

Analysts for Morgan Stanley, however, said they believed Toyota would not suffer much from the incident. "The company's actions to correct the situation are timely enough to avoid major brand damage," they remarked in a note to investors.


text: User talk:Mrawesome121

title: User talk:Mrawesome121


text: User talk:Raja247

title: User talk:Raja247


text: User talk:Froxel

title: User talk:Froxel


text: User talk:Katherine177

title: User talk:Katherine177


text: User talk:CITRUS YO

title: User talk:CITRUS YO


text: User talk:Nipplecollector

title: User talk:Nipplecollector


text:
Comments:People limited to 150 friends, despite Facebook, says academic

Wow! Revolutionary!!! Please........Does anyone remember "The Tipping Point" where this was actually the center piece idea of the book.


text: User talk:Coleman34

title: User talk:Coleman34


text: User talk:Ioantha

title: User talk:Ioantha


text: User talk:Tranhoangdai

title: User talk:Tranhoangdai


text: User talk:Andres2010gomez

title: User talk:Andres2010gomez


text: User talk:Drsanlinko

title: User talk:Drsanlinko


text:
User:Radiier

Radiier
I am an editor of Wikipedia and Wikinews. I speak English. I also speak Chinese.

Prove my identity
In the unlikely event that this account is compromised, I can provide a file to generate the following MD5SUM value to prove my identity. MD5SUM: e64192b27f3a94b15835342e5575bb48

Personal Home Page
Radiier

title: User:Radiier


text:
Talk:Decades-Old Building Collapsed in Hong Kong

Title
"Decades-old" hardly seems worthy of inclusion in title, the loss of life seems more important to me. --SVTCobra 04:09, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * and before I forget ... get rid of the Cap on each word per WN:NC and WN:SG --SVTCobra 04:11, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

I agree. Please change the title to Building collapsed leaving 4 dead Radiier (talk) 04:34, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Or... should I do it myself? How? Radiier (talk) 04:38, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Maybe I start a new page, instead. Radiier (talk) 04:42, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

The new title is now "Building collapsed leaving 4 dead in Hong Kong", created using the Create page button. "Decades-Old Building Collapsed in Hong Kong" can be deleted. Radiier (talk) 04:47, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Redirect from the old page to the new page "Building collapsed leaving 4 dead in Hong Kong" Radiier (talk) 07:50, 30 January 2010 (UTC)


text: User talk:Althafsalim48730

title: User talk:Althafsalim48730


text:
User talk:Radiier

Welcome
Tempodivalse [talk]  04:24, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

title: User talk:Radiier


text: User talk:DJMAERZ

title: User talk:DJMAERZ


text:
Building collapses, leaving four dead in Hong Kong

February 1, 2010

A decades-old building collapsed along Ma Tau Wai Road in Hong Kong at about 1:30pm on Friday, local time. That building was located at 45J, Ma Tau Wai Road in Hung Hom. A shop on its ground floor was undergoing renovations when the building collapsed. The street was full of dust afterwards. Firefighters arrived at the scene to search survivors and they asked residents in the buildings nearby to evacuate the area. Those buildings included 45G and 45H.

Chief Executive Donald Tsang called for an investigation into the cause of the building collapse. He aimed at preventing similar incidents. The government required all old buildings with similar structures to undergo inspection, according to Secretary for Development Carrie Lam.

The government has confirmed that four people were dead in the incident. Rescue efforts ended on Saturday morning when the government confirmed that no one was missing. Lam visited the scene on Saturday afternoon and sought advice from the police and Buildings Department. The police has started its investigation into the incident. Secretary for Labour & Welfare Matthew Cheung said that the government would do its best to meet the victims' needs.

The collapsed building was more than 50 years old. The government had inspected its five-storey structure before the incident and had ordered repairs. After the tragedy, the government announced that it would inspect buildings older than 50 years in one month. The government has restricted access to buildings at 45G and 45H as they were in danger.


text: User talk:Rickyvirgona

title: User talk:Rickyvirgona


text: User talk:Viveirohc

title: User talk:Viveirohc


text: User talk:Ianvision

title: User talk:Ianvision


text: User talk:Aravinth011

title: User talk:Aravinth011


text: User talk:Asalajith

title: User talk:Asalajith


text: User talk:Annafrenkel

title: User talk:Annafrenkel


text:
User talk:Freeinformation~enwikinews

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Freeinformation. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Freeinformation~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:17, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:31, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Freeinformation~enwikinews


text: User talk:T0115659j

title: User talk:T0115659j


text: User talk:Ravimunnurcode

title: User talk:Ravimunnurcode


text: Talk:Pentagon proposes Taiwanese arms sale


text:
User talk:Mlopez21~enwikinews

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Mlopez21. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Mlopez21~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:22, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:34, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mlopez21~enwikinews


text: User talk:Email1459

title: User talk:Email1459


text: User talk:Jungla81

title: User talk:Jungla81


text: User talk:Dosbears

title: User talk:Dosbears


text: User talk:Mlafkar

title: User talk:Mlafkar


text: User talk:Leighabette

title: User talk:Leighabette


text: User talk:Ariz zaidi

title: User talk:Ariz zaidi


text:
User talk:Surya Prakash J

Our submission guidelines
I'd like to let you know that here at the English Wikinews, we only accept English language news. You've recently made contributions that don't qualify as news. We appreciate your contributions, but we cannot accept the edits you've made, so they have been reverted or deleted.

In the future, if you'd like to submit news, we are more than happy to have your help! Just make sure to check out this article, which talks about what Wikinews is not.

Thank you for your contributions! Adi4094 (talk) 14:04, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Note
Tempodivalse [talk]  14:14, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

title: User talk:Surya Prakash J


text: User talk:111th congress

title: User talk:111th congress


text: Talk:Toyota recalls up to 1.8 million automobiles


text:
User:Kenrick95

 Kℇℵ℟ℑℭK  Wikipedia  Wiktionary  Wikibooks  Wikiquote  Wikisource Wikinews  Commons  Meta-Wiki  id.wiki Facebook id.wiki Twitter Ronda

 * I'm an Indonesian Wikipedia user !
 * Support Indonesian Wikinews ! (Meta - Incubator)
 * Contributions at English Wikinews (as 05:48, 18 September 2010 (UTC)):
 * Indonesian goverment bans pornographic sites

title: User:Kenrick95


text: Template:User id

title: Template:User id


text: User talk:Tomato1986

title: User talk:Tomato1986


text: User talk:Lamelylame

title: User talk:Lamelylame


text: User talk:Ashshreef

title: User talk:Ashshreef


text: User talk:Kentrw51 wiki

title: User talk:Kentrw51 wiki


text: User talk:Shivang1602

title: User talk:Shivang1602


text:
Talk:Building collapses, leaving four dead in Hong Kong

Please make this article longer. It is currently disjointed & looks strange. — μ 08:42, Saturday January 30 2010 (UTC)

Review of revision 947704 [Failed]
The story has been expanded. Radiier (talk) 14:32, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

I have improved the style of the article. Radiier (talk) 04:03, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

 * Please remove or move some pictures; or expand the article. There is too much whitespace generated. — μ 21:04, Sunday January 31 2010 (UTC)

Review of revision 949260 [Passed]
I added an image which shows the impact on bus services. The route number of the bus is not shown on the sign of the bus stop because the stop was temporarily used after the accident along Ma Tau Wai Road. Radiier (talk) 15:52, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Time
It was 1:30pm... but time of what country? UTC? Krzysiu Jarzyna (talk) 18:16, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
 * And what is the original raport in this? Only gallery or also the text? Krzysiu Jarzyna (talk) 18:41, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

It was Hong Kong Time. I wrote the texts with two photo's at first. I added more photo's afterwards. I wrote the original texts with reference to news sources. I took the original photo's with original descriptions. Radiier (talk) 14:56, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Add cat
editprotected add Category:Donald Tsang Kayau (talk) 13:39, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ Benny the mascot (talk) 20:50, 26 May 2010 (UTC)


text: User talk:Dhananjay1987

title: User talk:Dhananjay1987


text:
Google phases out IE6 support

January 30, 2010

Google has started phasing out support for Microsoft's Internet Explorer 6 (IE6), following a hacking attempt that exploited an IE6 vulnerability, despite the flaw being fixed promptly.

From March 1 on, some services, such as Google Docs, will not work "properly" when accessed from the browser. Google recommends that both firms and end-users upgrade "as soon as possible". Google now only officially supports Internet Explorer 7+, Firefox 3+, Chrome 4+ and Safari 3+.

Hackers exploited a weak spot in Internet Explorer to find the contents of Gmail accounts of human rights activists in China. Following this, both the French and German governments advised that users should switch to a different browser until the flaw had been plugged.

Microsoft issued a patch quickly after the revelations, pushing out a scheduled update just under three weeks earlier than they had scheduled. The software giant normally issues updates once a month, but the high press coverage led it to run an unscheduled update. However, Microsoft admitted that they knew about the problem "since early September", and were planning to patch it in February, leaving the hole open for five months.

Rajen Sheth, the Senior Product Manager for Google Apps, said in a blog post that the web had "evolved in the last ten years, from simple text pages to rich, interactive applications including video and voice", and that "very old browsers cannot run many [...] new features".

20% of users still use the browser, released in August 2001 in order to complement the then-new Windows XP operating system, including many governments. Microsoft will support the browser until 2014, although the browser has attracted strong criticism among people in the web industry.

The bad publicity garnered from the attacks has allowed rivals, such as Mozilla Firefox and Google's own browser, Chrome, to gain market share, allowing the open-source Firefox, of which a new version (3.6) has just been released, to claw a 40% share, close to overtaking Microsoft's 45%.

Last July, Google also dropped IE6 support from the popular video sharing site, YouTube. Popular sites, such as Facebook and Digg, have also dropped support. IE6 does not support several key technologies, making compatible web-design hard to do. For example, it does not render partial transparency in png images, and many site designers must work around the fact that Internet Explorer 6 does not support many important parts of the cascading style sheets (CSS) family of standards, which is how the majority of websites are designed.

title: Google phases out IE6 support


text: User talk:Pravinraj

title: User talk:Pravinraj


text: User talk:Necvlai

title: User talk:Necvlai


text: User talk:Asraful Kabir

title: User talk:Asraful Kabir


text: User talk:John Reqz

title: User talk:John Reqz


text: User:VanishedUser sdu9asdsopa/WWC2010/Newsletter/1


text:
China threatens to take action over US-Taiwan deal

January 31, 2010

China has stated that they will cease all military exchanges with the United States in response to a weapons deal with Taiwan going ahead. He Yafei, Chinese Vice-Foreign Minister, said that there would be a "serious negative impact" with regards to the relationship between the US and China.

Taiwan and mainland China have been ruled by separate governments since 1949, and neither recognize each other's independence. In an effort to regain control of Taiwan, the government in Beijing has been open to running the island like Hong Kong, in a "one country, two systems" manner, but people in Taiwan support the status quo. The Chinese defense ministry said that they had "decided to suspend planned mutual military visits". They "strongly demand" that the United States "respect the Chinese side's interests," calling for the proposal to be rejected.

China summoned the US Ambassador to China, Jon Huntsman, to warn the US Government about the consequences, and to urge for cancellation of the deal. The Pentagon proposed the deal, that was first promised during the later days of the Bush administration, to Congress earlier.

Yafei issued a statement on the Foreign Ministry website stating that "the United States' announcement of the planned weapons sales to Taiwan will have a seriously negative impact on many important areas of exchanges and co-operation between the two countries."

However, the US is defending itself. "Such sales contribute to maintaining security and stability across the Taiwan Strait", Laura Tischler, spokeswoman for the US State Department, said.

Beijing is threatening to review co-operation on major issues and impose sanctions on companies selling arms, even though US companies are banned from selling arms to China as a result of the Tiananmen Square massacre in 1989, so it is not clear what the effect will be. A Chinese defence ministry spokesman said that the sanctions reflected the "severe harm" the deal would have. A foreign ministry spokesman stated that there would be "repercussions that neither side wishes to see" if the deal went ahead.

Taiwan, one of Asia's few functioning democracies, welcomed the proposal, with Taiwanese president Ma Ying-jeou being quoted as saying "It will let Taiwan feel more confident and secure so we can have more interactions with China."

The arms deal includes UH-60 Black Hawk helicopters, communications equipment and MIM-104 Patriot missiles, but does not include the F-16 fighter jets that Taiwan's military were looking for. The US is legally obliged to supply Taiwan with defensive weapons under the Taiwan Relations Act 1979.

In 2003, an unnamed US briefing stated that "[the US] would have to get involved if China tried to use coercion or force to unilaterally change the status of Taiwan".


text: User talk:Blossomheart

title: User talk:Blossomheart


text:
At least twelve die in Mogadishu attacks

January 30, 2010

Early on Friday, Islamic insurgents fought with African peace-keepers and the Somali army in Mogadishu, capital of Somalia, killing twelve people. The battle raged on for hours, according to sources. The al-Shabaab group claimed responsibility for the attack.

Twelve civilians were killed in the incident, while 25 were injured. The Hodan Wardhigley and Howl Wadag districts were the worst hit. Medical authorities claimed that the deaths had occurred when mortar fire had burnt their houses. The fire came from both the insurgents and the peace-keepers, according to the officials. Ali Musa, one of the officials of a volunteer ambulance service in Mogadishu, said that a mother and her two children had died during the firing.

The attack commenced on 2 AM, Friday. Awakened by mortar explosions, residents hid inside their houses, while others left for safer places. The battle went on for hours and the sound of the firing emanated to all parts of the Somali capital.

This was the most intense fighting in months, claim residents. "I thought I was dreaming when I heard the sound of the artillery," said Asha Abdulle, Mogadishu resident, while Ahmed Hashi said that the fighting was the "worst in months." Nurta Hussein, another resident said: "We were woken up by the explosions at 2 a.m. and haven't slept since because of the non-stop shelling. Two mortar bombs landed in this neighborhood, killing four civilians and wounding six."

Almost 20,000 Somali civilians have died since 2007, as a result of multiple insurgent attacks. Almost 1.5 million have been forced to leave the country since that time.

The al-Shabab as well as another group, called Hizbul Islam, claimed responsibility in a statement they released. They successfully attacked "the strongholds of the enemies of Allah," claimed the statement. "The mujahideen attacked AMISOM and government bases last night and we killed some of their troops. When we pulled back, AMISOM began intentionally shelling residential areas. We shall keep on targeting them," said the attackers. However Somali officials called the attack "small and careless."

Mogadishu's "Kilometer Four" area was one of those affected. It includes a square that connects the airport to the port. While the area has been attacked several times previously, this attack is said to be the worst. African Union peace-keepers from Uganda are posted there.

The fighting comes almost a year since Sheikh Sharif Sheikh Ahmed was sworn in as the nation's new president.

Al-Shabaab is considered a terrorist body by the United States; the latter blames it for multiple attacks, shootings and bombings inside Somalia.

Al-Shabaab has also threatened other African countries, including Ethiopia, Djibouti, Kenya, Eritrea, Ghana, Sudan and Uganda.

An African Union soldier, on a condition of anonymity, said that one Ugandan soldier was killed in the clash. He added that another soldier was wounded. A Somali government official backed this claim. Earlier, on Monday, two AU soldiers had died in another mortar attack in an AU clinic.

When contacted through telephone, Somalia's Defence Minister, Sheikh Yusuf Mohammad Siad, who is a former warlord (also known as "Inda'ade" or "white eyed") said more than ten insurgents had died in the clash.

Parts of the Shabaab group have connections with al-Qaeda. The former has regularly attacked different parts of Somalia, with suicide bombers and several insurgents, taking advantage of the weak political and military infrastructure of the country. The incident occurred exactly an year following President Sheikh Sharif Ahmed election to the parliament. The government was set to celebrate its first anniversary with a parade and poetry recitations at the presidential palace, named Villa Somalia. It was not known whether the attack intentionally collided with this event. However, it was a reminder of Somalia's weak military power; the army was heavily dependent on the African troops in this attack as well.

For over two decades, the country has had no central government. This has led to warlords ruling the nation, which often suffers from attacks by militant groups and pirate ships.

During an African Union (AU) summit Addis Ababa, capital of Ethiopia, Ali Jama' Jangeli, Somali Foreign Minister, requested more African Union troops to assist other soldiers in the capital. Both Kenya and Sudan backed Jangeli; Djibouti answered the call and promised to send 450 soldiers soon.

"The situation in Somalia is very grim, it is very precarious. It is threatening stability in the whole of the east Africa region and the Horn of Africa. It is in our interest as a region ... also in the interest of Africa to contribute more troops to Somalia so that there is law and order in Somalia," claimed Jangeli's Sudanese counterpart, Deng Alor.

The United States and Western nations are supportive of Sheik Sharif Sheik Ahmed's government, amidst fears that Somalia would become a base for al-Qaeda and other such organizations. However, the Somali government controls only few city blocks in the country.

Apart from attacks on government forces, the militants have also bombed the country's principal airport. There also has been an explosion during a college graduation ceremony, claim civilians.

Western nations have spent millions of dollars to buy weapons and ammunition for the Somali army. However, since the Shabab group controls a significant part of the country, the Somali government has had limited success. The group has won several battles and displaced millions of Somali people.


text: User talk:Fan of Zhirkov

title: User talk:Fan of Zhirkov


text: User talk:Navneetaudichya

title: User talk:Navneetaudichya


text: User talk:Liridon

title: User talk:Liridon


text: User talk:Raufalami123

title: User talk:Raufalami123


text: Talk:Regional council fights to keep sustainable growth on Australian Sunshine Coast


text:
User talk:89.193.244.139

Tony Blair tells Iraq Inquiry he would invade again
Hello. I notice you recently added your personal opinion to the above article. This is not allowed, as Wikinews has a commitment to a neutral point of view. However, we do have Comments: pages for exactly that purpose, so please feel free to re-post your comment (which I have removed from the article) on Comments:Tony Blair tells Iraq Inquiry he would invade again. Den dodge  T\C 11:12, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

title: User talk:89.193.244.139


text: User talk:Tnt1921

title: User talk:Tnt1921


text: Talk:Hamas claims Israel assassinated commander in Dubai


text: User talk:Simple.fatima

title: User talk:Simple.fatima


text: User talk:Ava.a

title: User talk:Ava.a


text: User talk:Madinessex

title: User talk:Madinessex


text: User talk:Nirmal93

title: User talk:Nirmal93


text: Talk:Woman dies after being struck by fire truck hose in Cambridge, Massachusetts


text: User talk:Ashishdua1986

title: User talk:Ashishdua1986


text:
Gandhi ashes scattered off South African coast

January 30, 2010 Some ashes from Indian independence leader Mohandas Gandhi have been scattered off the coast of South Africa to mark the 62nd anniversary of Gandhi's death.

Two hundred family and friends attended the Hindu ceremony, conducted by the South African navy, in which the ashes were sprinkled on to the Indian Ocean. Hindu custom dictates that ashes are scattered over a body of water after cremation, but Gandhi's ashes, Gandhi being cremated after he was assassinated in 1948, were instead divided up and distributed to friends and family. It is difficult to work out how many portions of ashes are still in the hands of the recipients.

After a priest recited hymns, Gandhi's great-grandson poured the ashes into the sea. People then threw flowers into the sea.

The ashes were given to the family by a friend, Vilas Mehta, who had decided to keep the ashes as a memento, not realising the Hindu custom. She passed on a "little silver container" to her daughter-in-law, who, in turn, gave it to Gandhi's family last year.

Ela Gandhi, the Indian national hero's sixty nine year-old granddaughter, attended the ceremony, as well as making a speech, in which she highlighted the fact that intolerance was still rife. She said, "I think one of the important messages of his death is the intolerance that goes on in this world, the intolerance of people for other people on the basis of religion, on the basis of race, on the basis of ethnicity, of class and of caste and so on". She went on to say that the Indian Ocean was chosen as it linked the two countries "on which he had such a profound influence".

Gandhi campaigned for rights in both South Africa and India. He is also known as the "Father of India", and he was a pioneer of the non-cooperation movement. He is synonymous with peace, and has an award named after him.

This is not the first time Gandhi's ashes have resurfaced. In 2008, his ashes were donated to a museum in Mumbai, who scattered them into the Arabian Sea.


text: User talk:Shaderyt

title: User talk:Shaderyt


text: User talk:Dorr22

title: User talk:Dorr22


text: User talk:Santìbar

title: User talk:Santìbar


text:
Talk:Gandhi ashes scattered off South African coast

resurfaced probably needs changing, considering they're being scattered at sea — μ 12:37, Saturday January 30 2010 (UTC)


text: User talk:Brogansmith

title: User talk:Brogansmith


text: User talk:Jclittle111

title: User talk:Jclittle111


text:
Ten confirmed dead, scores missing as overcrowded boat capsizes in India

January 30, 2010 Ten pilgrims, four of them women were drowned in the Godavari river in India today. This incident occurred when an overcrowded boat capsized in the Andhra Pradesh river, which is the second largest in the country.

A police officer said ten bodies had been discovered as yet, among the 70 people the boat was ferrying. Local people rescued 40 passengers; the remaining twenty are missing. There are four women and four children among the dead.

The mishap occurred near Upputeru in Narsapuram mandal of West Godavari district of the state. This section is located near the mouth of the river. The pilgrims were headed for Lakshmi Narasimha Swami temple (also called Antarvedi temple) in the district, on the other side of the river. Officials stated that the victims, most of whom were from fishermen families from the nearby villages, were headed for the temple for a holy dip, when the incident occurred.

Police sources claimed the boat was carrying in excess of its capacity, thus leading to the incident. Before capsizing, it had allegedly hit an empty boat.

The boat capsized at around 07:00 AM (local time) near Biyyaputeppa village, 190 kilometers from Vijaywada, said A Vani Prasad, the West Godavari District Collector.

Rescue and relief operations have been initiated by the government. Divers commenced the search for the missing people as special rescue boats arrived from Visakhapatnam and Rajhamundry.

Joint collector Ronald Ross was met by the angry relatives of the victims when he arrived at the scene. The former assured that all efforts were being put in the search for those missing.

Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister, K Rosaiah expressed shock and sorrow over the incident. He ordered district minister-in-charge, Vatti Vasant Kumar to go to the scene and monitor relief and rescue work.


text: User talk:Lwojcieszak

title: User talk:Lwojcieszak


text:
Suicide bomber hits checkpoint in Pakistan

January 30, 2010

At least sixteen people, including two paramilitary soldiers, have been killed today, and 25 people injured, after a suicide bomber attack on a checkpoint in, in the region of north-west Pakistan, according to officials. Initial reports suggested that the bomber was in a vehicle, and a local official states that the bomber was wearing a suicide vest.

It is thought that the bomber detonated the vest when security forces stopped him for a search at the checkpoint, situated in a marketplace. After the attack, a curfew was imposed and all bazaars in the city shut down. The bomber was said to be headed towards military barracks before he was stopped.

Pakistani Prime Minister, condemned the bombing, and expressed deep grief and sorrow, according to a statement issued by his office. He called for an immediate inquiry. No group has claimed responsibility for the attack, but government officials blame the.

Pakistani forces have been attacking militants in the Bajaur region, which, close to the Afghan border, is suspected to be the hiding place of, as well as other leaders. At least 24 suspected militants have been killed in the fighting, according to government officials.

In February 2009, the army announced that Bajaur had been cleansed of Taliban militants, following a ground offensive launched in October 2008. However, the situation is getting worse, with numerous attacks in the last six months.


text: User talk:Hien1710

title: User talk:Hien1710


text: User talk:Vastageddon

title: User talk:Vastageddon


text: User talk:The Piano Dodc

title: User talk:The Piano Dodc


text: User talk:Cambuta

title: User talk:Cambuta


text: User talk:Nesagalija

title: User talk:Nesagalija


text: User talk:Shashikapoor160

title: User talk:Shashikapoor160


text: User talk:Orrmaster

title: User talk:Orrmaster


text: User talk:DanDud88

title: User talk:DanDud88


text: User talk:Murugan 1101

title: User talk:Murugan 1101


text: User talk:Sugumar3034

title: User talk:Sugumar3034


text:
Talk:Google phases out IE6 support

Review of revision 948014 [Passed]
-- It'd be nice to say what the flaw was. Some sort of XSS vulnrability i'm geussing, but it'd be nice to know. I'm also changing the line about latest version of css not being supported, as it is misleading (which is latest version, CSS 2.1 or CSS 3? either way, not browser supports the latest version of CSS fully) Of course IE6 has very bad support compared to other browsers. Bawolff ☺☻ 01:30, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Also i'd point out it does support one bit transparency in png's as well as in gifs, IE just did not support having an alpha channel. (Theres a difference). Also both png's and css (version 1, the version that IE6 was mostly lacking in that got fixed in IE7, later versions of CSS are not supported by anyone, although ie7 did fix some CSS2.1 stuff) were released in 1996, which is before 2001. Bawolff ☺☻ 01:41, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

title: Talk:Google phases out IE6 support


text: User talk:The Hegemarch

title: User talk:The Hegemarch


text: User talk:Gabriel20010

title: User talk:Gabriel20010


text: User talk:Maxdankley

title: User talk:Maxdankley


text:
Interpreter shoots two US soldiers in Afghanistan

January 30, 2010 Two US soldiers killed in Afghanistan yesterday were shot by an Afghan interpreter in Wardek province south-west of Kabul, according to NATO. An official said the translator shot them at an eastern Afghanistan outpost before he was shot dead by other soldiers.

It is not yet clear why the interpreter started shooting; However, the attacker seemed to be a "disgruntled employee", as opposed to a militant, according to a US military official. The interpreter had supposedly argued with the soldiers over pay and treatment before opening fire. A US employee was also killed.

NATO originally only released a terse statement yesterday, stating that two soldiers and one civilian had been killed.

Elsewhere in Wardek province, four Afghan soldiers died in an airstrike by coalition forces. It is not thought that the two incidents are related. NATO called the deaths "regrettable" and is to carry out an investigation. The Afghan defence ministry is demanding punishment for the "murderers" responsible for the airstrike.


text: User talk:HappyRogue

title: User talk:HappyRogue


text: User talk:Lino94

title: User talk:Lino94


text: User talk:Shivananda Kumar

title: User talk:Shivananda Kumar


text: User talk:RyanASmith

title: User talk:RyanASmith


text: User talk:Kylinfaith

title: User talk:Kylinfaith


text:
User talk:Vikas pimr~enwikinews

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Vikas pimr. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Vikas pimr~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:37, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:40, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Vikas pimr~enwikinews


text: User talk:Alexbess

title: User talk:Alexbess


text: User talk:Kristine.kirby

title: User talk:Kristine.kirby


text: User talk:Rasssmus

title: User talk:Rasssmus


text: User talk:Ato72543

title: User talk:Ato72543


text: User talk:Mita993

title: User talk:Mita993


text: Talk:Interpreter shoots two US soldiers in Afghanistan


text: User talk:Nihon.ai

title: User talk:Nihon.ai


text: User talk:Qqnx

title: User talk:Qqnx


text: User talk:Quornik

title: User talk:Quornik


text: User talk:Josereyes0

title: User talk:Josereyes0


text: User talk:Eedwa 01

title: User talk:Eedwa 01


text: User talk:Yrwyddfa

title: User talk:Yrwyddfa


text: User talk:Osandu

title: User talk:Osandu


text: User talk:Chuckwoz

title: User talk:Chuckwoz


text: User talk:Frankgas

title: User talk:Frankgas


text: User talk:Modliszka1980

title: User talk:Modliszka1980


text: User talk:Ncebak

title: User talk:Ncebak


text: User talk:Uzhe lucee

title: User talk:Uzhe lucee


text: User talk:Michael Blakeley

title: User talk:Michael Blakeley


text: User talk:Rembertbiemond

title: User talk:Rembertbiemond


text:
Comments:Hamas claims Israel assassinated commander in Dubai

Assasination or Justice, a political choice of words
Since Hamas has declared war on Jews world wide I would ask why Wikemedia would choice the word assassinate, with its pejorative inference, to describe the removal of an an individual who is avowed to the killing of a people based on their religious beliefs.

 * If you think about the word's meaning, it has no inference. You may choose to infer something with it, but it remains an assassination, even if it were an entirely legal assassination. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 18:31, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Or if you use Wiktionary, "killing or murder for political reasons." An argument might be made that this was related to security more than politics, but the claim of assassination is being made by Hamas, not Wikinews. --Fishy c (talk) 00:21, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

it sounds like Wikinews is the official Hammas News channel
it sounds like Wikinews is the official Hammas News channel, Never seen the news so one sided!! (hey... hey... We believe Wikinews is neutral,don't we?? :D)

Hamas must have proof for the fact
Based on conflicts have occurred, we can see HAMAS show hostility to Israel. I believe Israeli have more hatred to Palestinian. With the collapsed of HAMAS, it can give Israel more chance to destroy Palestinian.


text: User talk:Madhubrati

title: User talk:Madhubrati


text: User talk:Mahfut De Lemann

title: User talk:Mahfut De Lemann


text: User talk:Jackdocherty

title: User talk:Jackdocherty


text:
Russia announces Libyan arms deal

January 30, 2010

Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin announced today that the country will supply US$1.8bn (€1.3bn) worth of weapons to Libya. The deal, which will include small-arms and other weapons, is worth almost a quarter of last year's arms exports.

The deal was signed on Friday, during a meeting with Libyan defence minister Abu Bakr Yunis Jaber, who was in Moscow for several days. Although Russian media have speculated that the deal will contain fighter planes, tanks and anti-air missiles, the Russian government is remaining silent, hinting only that it is "not just small arms".

The deal was announced at a meeting with Vladimir Grodetsky, the director of Izhmash, a small-arms manufacturer that constructs the famous Kalashnikov rifle. Grodetsky wished to thank Putin for securing the deal, the sales of which, he said, would keep one of its plants going for two years.

Russia already has five arms deals with Libya.

title: Russia announces Libyan arms deal


text:
User:Dendodge/User stats

Statistics generated based on published articles as of 17:59, 30 January 2010 (UTC). I couldn't be bothered to go searching, so I only compiled stats for users who list their articles on their userpage (therefore, there may be some inaccuracy in that some people list articles to which they contributed, while others only articles they created). I've probably missed some of these, too, so feel free to add yourself.

title: User:Dendodge/User stats


text: User talk:Jjadup123

title: User talk:Jjadup123


text: User talk:Wittysage

title: User talk:Wittysage


text: User talk:Simontuk

title: User talk:Simontuk


text: User talk:ManozDev

title: User talk:ManozDev


text: User talk:Believe108

title: User talk:Believe108


text: User talk:Thegodhimasnhu

title: User talk:Thegodhimasnhu


text: User talk:Lucas Tiridath

title: User talk:Lucas Tiridath


text: User talk:Donaldk36

title: User talk:Donaldk36


text: User talk:PIPony22

title: User talk:PIPony22


text: User talk:Johnnym123

title: User talk:Johnnym123


text: User talk:Bala1682

title: User talk:Bala1682


text: User talk:Simran42

title: User talk:Simran42


text: User talk:Lenamirotes

title: User talk:Lenamirotes


text: User talk:Kshriram

title: User talk:Kshriram


text: Talk:Russia announces Libyan arms deal

title: Talk:Russia announces Libyan arms deal


text:
Indiana Department of Homeland Security violates Wikipedia copyright

February 2, 2010 🇺🇸 The Indiana Department of Homeland Security was revealed on Saturday to have violated the copyright of a number of contributors to online encyclopedia Wikipedia in a document on racial profiling by quoting Wikipedia articles without any attribution.

The PDF file, which was created as a guide for students in grades 9–12 "[t]o research positions related to the topic of racial profiling post September 11, 2001 with a primary focus on citizens of Middle Eastern descent, and to give an informative speech", quotes from seven Wikipedia articles without mentioning Wikipedia at any point. These are: Racial Profiling, USA PATRIOT Act, Bigotry, Internment, Terrorism, Counter-terrorism, and The War on Terrorism, all in the "Vocabulary" section. This is against Wikipedia's Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC-BY-SA) License, which requires that the original author(s) be attributed.

The offending document was posted on the Indiana Department of Homeland Security's website on October 30, 2009, and came to the attention of the Wikipedia community on Saturday, after a user editing under the pseudonym of Smallman12q mentioned it on the website's community noticeboard, the Village Pump. His post began, "I came across this pdf produced by the Indiana Department of Homeland Security for racial profiling and found that in it [...] the vocabulary section on page[s] 3/4 [is] copied from [W]ikipedia, yet there is no attribution to Wikipedia or even a mention of it..." The document also contains typographical and grammatical errors, "[citation needed]" tags, and meaningless in-line references, due to the content being a direct copy-and-paste of Wikipedia content.

In a statement to Wikinews, Smallman12q explained that he "came across the pdf after doing a google search for ad hominem with the 'site' parameter set to .gov." He also commented on "the irony" of finding this when his whole reason for searching government sources was so that he "would[n]'t have to worry about copyright infringement" due to government works being in the public domain (he was mistaken on this point, as this only applies to works of the US federal government, while this document was created by the government of the state of Indiana). He used the document as a reference in the Internment article on Wikipedia, before realizing that "the content of the article and the pdf virtually matched". He noticed the "[1]" tag in the document, which was undefined in the PDF and corresponded to a Wikipedia in-line reference. "Looking at the other vocabulary terms within the pdf and their Wikipedia counterparts, they too were identical," he says, "I then realized that they must have been copied from Wikipedia..."

The CC-BY-SA licence states that "You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor", while the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use specify either "a) a hyperlink (where possible) or URL to the page or pages you are re-using, b) a hyperlink (where possible) or URL to an alternative, stable online copy which is freely accessible, which conforms with the license, and which provides credit to the authors in a manner equivalent to the credit given on this website, or c) a list of all authors", none of which were given in the IDHS's document, despite it having a bibliography section.

Wikinews contacted Jimmy Wales, the founder and chair emeritus of the foundation, for a statement regarding the issue. He expressed no concern about the issue, saying that "Wikipedia is widely famous for being something that you can freely copy, and we love it when people do it.  Yes, there are rules  about how to do it, but not everyone understands those rules at first.  I'm sure it won't happen again, and I certainly am not particularly  agitated about it."

The offending document has since been removed from the Indiana Department of Homeland Security's website, Wikinews found on February 2.


text: User talk:Little.doll

title: User talk:Little.doll


text: User talk:Baltazar9000

title: User talk:Baltazar9000


text: User talk:Prrreeee

title: User talk:Prrreeee


text: User talk:Mbmbmb123456789

title: User talk:Mbmbmb123456789


text: User talk:عبدالرحمن س.

title: User talk:عبدالرحمن س.


text:
Talk:Indiana Department of Homeland Security violates Wikipedia copyright

OR notes
I wrote this article based on the PDF and original Wikipedia post. I am also contacting the deputy head of Kansas Homeland Security for a statement. Den dodge  T\C 20:25, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Why Kansas? What do they have to do with Indiana? 75.168.140.67 (talk) 22:38, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * We have their contact details, and it would be interesting to see what another state thinks. Den dodge  T\C 22:40, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh. That was me by the way. I can confirm via the scoop that emails were sent. Calebrw (talk) 22:42, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Indiana Department of Homeland Security
An attempt to contact Indiana Department of Homeland Security (Kansas???) should be made, to receive a comment from them, before this is allowed to be published. Cirt (talk) 19:56, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

 * Kansas was my idea, purely on the basis I happened to have contact for someone fairly senior and 'I'm sticking by them' or 'I think this is highly unprofessional of this state' would be very interesting. I did mention we need to go through the front door for Indiana; I don't know if that's been done. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 20:03, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
 * http://www.in.gov/dhs/ = contact info is that way... Cirt (talk) 20:16, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

 * Dendodge: Done that yet? If not, I'm happy to. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 20:18, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Just contacted Media Relations a second ago. Den dodge  T\C 20:21, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Excellent, thanks! Cirt (talk) 20:23, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Kansas? Why bother Kansas? They have no jurisdiction over Indiana. If anything, the United States Department of Homeland Security should have been contacted...Smallman12q (talk) 21:10, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

 * Like I said, be interesting if he kicks his fellows in the nuts over this. If it was going through the press address, then no, but I already had contact details for someone at the top. His opinion on this is news - or has the potential to be. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 21:17, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

List terms
Perhaps the terms that were copied should be listed somewhere?Smallman12q (talk) 20:52, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
 * You seem to know your way around this best. If you'd like to put together a list (either here or in the article), I'm sure we can do something with it. If you can't I maybe could, but it would most likely take me a lot longer. Den dodge  T\C 21:19, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
 * It might be best, considering you are mentioned in the article, that you post it on this talk page, not in the article itself. — μ 21:26, Sunday January 31 2010 (UTC)
 * I did wonder about that. It probably would be better, but I'm not sure it's a big deal, TBH. Den dodge  T\C 21:41, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Taken from my village pump post... It uses 7 terms from Wikipedia: Racial Profiling, USA PATRIOT Act, Bigotry, Internment, Terrorism, Counter-terrorism, The War on Terrorism. (For those who can't count) Smallman12q (talk) 21:45, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Racial Profiling
 * USA PATRIOT Act
 * Bigotry
 * Internment
 * Terrorism
 * Counter-terrorism
 * The War on Terrorism
 * That's in paragraph 2. Den dodge  T\C 22:21, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
 * =D.Smallman12q (talk) 01:50, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Pulled
The PDF link goes to a 404... go us. — μ 10:55, Tuesday February 2 2010 (UTC)

Comment for sources
Could someone please add to the "sources" section a link to my comments at User talk:Dendodge/Jan 10 from which the quotes are taken? Thanks!Smallman12q (talk) 23:00, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Question...
I couldn't see on the user page if "smallman12q" was infact male (The article uses "he"). Is this correct? 150.250.43.209 (talk) 04:35, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I guessed based on the "man" part of his name, and he has spoken to me on my talk page, as well as reading and commenting on this article, so I presume he would have corrected me had he, in fact, been a she. Δεν δοδγε  τ\c 12:30, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
 * As the name implies, smallman12q is indeed a he=D.Smallman12q (talk) 22:09, 5 February 2010 (UTC)


text: User talk:BRPXQZME

title: User talk:BRPXQZME


text:
User talk:Ilija.milcinoski

Please remember to sign all comments with and to post new messages at the bottom. Also, please refrain from offensive or inflammatory comments. For assistance please ask at the Water cooler. Thank you

peer review
We require peer review of each article by an independent editor before it can be published; articles that haven't been peer reviewed don't get published even if you put the publish tag on them — it only makes them harder to find in the Newsroom. I've removed the publish tag from Delayed flights from Skopje airport for you, which has moved it from the "Articles mispublished" section of the Newsroom to the "Articles in development (That are not disputed)" section. It does need significant work to put it into the form we use for articles; see Writing an article. --Pi zero (talk) 14:56, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Welcome
Thanks for experimenting with Wikinews. Your test worked, and has now been reverted or removed. Please use Sandbox for any other tests you want to do, since testing in articles may disrupt the site's working and will be reverted quickly. , welcome to Wikinews! Please refrain from using content pages for testing. Here are a few good links for newcomers on how to edit Wikinews:

Our key policies - if you read anything, read these! Here a few pointers to help you get to know Wikinews: There are always things to do on Wikinews: By the way, you can sign your name on Talk pages using four tildes ( ~~~~ ), which produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, you can ask them at the water cooler or to anyone on the Welcommittee, or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! — Mike moral  ♪♫  18:09, 29 May 2010 (UTC) ok thaks for the help ilija.milcinoski
 * Neutral point of view - tell every side to a story in a fair and balanced way
 * Cite sources - everything in a Wikinews article must be sourced
 * Introduction - overview of the site
 * Writing an article - how to write and publish a complete article
 * Content guide - what's suitable for Wikinews
 * Style guide - how an article should look before publishing
 * Contents - the contents page.
 * Existing articles need expanding and checking for spelling and mistakes
 * The front page lead articles often need updating
 * Developing stories need finishing and publishing
 * Discussions need your input
 * And of course, stories need writing!

title: User talk:Ilija.milcinoski


text: User talk:Waterpoll1

title: User talk:Waterpoll1


text: User talk:Tikkit88

title: User talk:Tikkit88


text: User talk:DOPPIOTRIKSTER

title: User talk:DOPPIOTRIKSTER


text: User talk:Wpdpaintballsupplies

title: User talk:Wpdpaintballsupplies


text: User talk:TokioNadril

title: User talk:TokioNadril


text: User talk:Dmacleod14

title: User talk:Dmacleod14


text: User talk:Niaj makhdum

title: User talk:Niaj makhdum


text: User talk:Luis.cazalla

title: User talk:Luis.cazalla


text: User talk:Remisx

title: User talk:Remisx


text:
Talk:Alex Reid wins UK's Celebrity Big Brother 2010

Review of revision 947935 [Passed]
editprotected

Could you please add the following to this article, just above the sources:

Related news

 * [[Image:Yes_check.svg|link=|alt=|16px]] Done — Gopher65talk 00:46, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes_check.svg|link=|alt=|16px]] Done — Gopher65talk 00:46, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes_check.svg|link=|alt=|16px]] Done — Gopher65talk 00:46, 27 February 2010 (UTC)


text:
Talk:China threatens to take action over US-Taiwan deal

Grammar
The grammar of this article needs to be thoroughly checked before a peer review is done on it. I got rid of some commas splices and other errors, but I'm sure I missed some. Calebrw (talk) 06:31, 31 January 2010 (UTC)


text: User talk:Stephen85442

title: User talk:Stephen85442


text: User talk:Seahorseruler

title: User talk:Seahorseruler


text: User talk:Vallix

title: User talk:Vallix


text: Talk:Ten confirmed dead, scores missing as overcrowded boat capsizes in India


text: Talk:At least twelve die in Mogadishu attacks


text: User talk:Pokethesquirrel

title: User talk:Pokethesquirrel


text: User talk:Jason.lin221

title: User talk:Jason.lin221


text: User talk:Rtneves

title: User talk:Rtneves


text: User talk:Daro90

title: User talk:Daro90


text: User talk:Unxunleashed

title: User talk:Unxunleashed


text: User talk:Jayme noel

title: User talk:Jayme noel


text: User talk:Hasantopko

title: User talk:Hasantopko


text: User talk:Djf71856

title: User talk:Djf71856


text:
US government stops Haiti evacuations

January 31, 2010 The US military has halted the evacuation of victims of the Haiti earthquake for medical care, reportedly due to uncertainty about who will pay for the costs.

A military official told the New York Times that flights to the US were stopped on Wednesday, as some hospitals didn't want to receive the refugees.

"Apparently, some states were unwilling to accept the entry of Haitian patients for follow-on critical care. We manage air evacuation missions, but without a destination to fly to we can't move anybody. If we don't have permission to bring them, or they won't take them in, we can't fly the mission. It's pretty simple," US Transportation Command spokesman Capt Kevin Aandahl said yesterday. He did not say, however, which states specifically refused more evacuees.

The New York Times reports that five hundred victims of the quake have been treated in Florida so far. A spokesman for Floridian governor Charlie Crist, however, commented that he wasn't aware of any hospitals in the state refusing to accept more evacuees. In a letter to US Health Secretary Kathleen Sebelius earlier this week, however, the governor commented that "Florida's healthcare system is quickly reaching saturation, especially in the area of high-level trauma care," and asked for the National Disaster Medical System to be activated. That system is primarily used to help fund victims of domestic disasters.

A doctor in the earthquake-ravaged country, however, remarked that many of his patients could die if not airlifted soon. "We have 100 critically ill patients who will die in the next day or two if we don't med-evac them," said Doctor Green, chairman for the University of Miami's Global Institute for Community Health and Development, to the Associated Press.

An earthquake, with a magnitude of 7.0, struck Haiti on January 12, killing as much as 200,000 people and largely destroying the capital Port-au-Prince; another million have been left without homes.

title: US government stops Haiti evacuations


text:
Category:February 1, 2010

de:Kategorie:01.02.2010 es:Categoría:1 de febrero de 2010 fr:Catégorie:1er février 2010 it:Categoria:1 febbraio 2010 hu:Kategória:2010. február 1. ja:Category:2010年2月1日 pl:Kategoria:1 lutego 2010 pt:Categoria:1 de fevereiro de 2010 ro:Categorie:1 februarie 2010 sr:Категорија:1. фебруар 2010. fi:Luokka:1. helmikuuta 2010 ta:பகுப்பு:பெப்ரவரி 1, 2010 zh:Category:2010年2月1日

title: Category:February 1, 2010


text:
Category:February 2010

bs:Kategorija:Februar 2010 ca:Categoria:Febrer del 2010 cs:Kategorie:Únor 2010 de:Kategorie:Februar 2010 es:Categoría:Febrero de 2010 eo:Kategorio:Februaro de 2010 fr:Catégorie:Février 2010 it:Categoria:Febbraio 2010 ja:カテゴリ:2010年2月 no:Kategori:Februar 2010 pl:Kategoria:Luty 2010 pt:Categoria:Fevereiro de 2010 ro:Categorie:Februarie 2010 ru:Категория:Февраль 2010 sr:Категорија:Фебруар 2010. fi:Luokka:Helmikuu 2010 tr:Kategori:2010/02 uk:Категорія:Лютий 2010 zh:Category:2010年2月

title: Category:February 2010


text:
Wikinews:2010/February/1

 category=Published category=February 1, 2010 notcategory=Disputed notcategory=No publish suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Wikinews:2010/February/1


text:
Portal:Australia/2010/February/1

 category=February 1, 2010 category=Published category=Australia notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:Australia/2010/February/1


text:
Portal:New Zealand/2010/February/1

 category=February 1, 2010 category=Published category=New Zealand notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:New Zealand/2010/February/1


text:
Category:February 2, 2010

de:Kategorie:02.02.2010 es:Categoría:2 de febrero de 2010 fr:Catégorie:2 février 2010 it:Categoria:2 febbraio 2010 hu:Kategória:2010. február 2. ja:Category:2010年2月2日 pl:Kategoria:2 lutego 2010 pt:Categoria:2 de fevereiro de 2010 ro:Categorie:2 februarie 2010 sr:Категорија:2. фебруар 2010. fi:Luokka:2. helmikuuta 2010 ta:பகுப்பு:பெப்ரவரி 2, 2010 zh:Category:2010年2月2日

title: Category:February 2, 2010


text:
Wikinews:2010/February/2

 category=Published category=February 2, 2010 notcategory=Disputed notcategory=No publish suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Wikinews:2010/February/2


text:
Portal:Australia/2010/February/2

 category=February 2, 2010 category=Published category=Australia notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:Australia/2010/February/2


text:
Portal:New Zealand/2010/February/2

 category=February 2, 2010 category=Published category=New Zealand notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:New Zealand/2010/February/2


text:
Category:February 3, 2010

de:Kategorie:03.02.2010 es:Categoría:3 de febrero de 2010 fr:Catégorie:3 février 2010 it:Categoria:3 febbraio 2010 hu:Kategória:2010. február 3. ja:Category:2010年2月3日 pl:Kategoria:3 lutego 2010 pt:Categoria:3 de fevereiro de 2010 ro:Categorie:3 februarie 2010 ru:Категория:3 февраля 2010 sr:Категорија:3. фебруар 2010. fi:Luokka:3. helmikuuta 2010 ta:பகுப்பு:பெப்ரவரி 3, 2010 zh:Category:2010年2月3日

title: Category:February 3, 2010


text:
Wikinews:2010/February/3

 category=Published category=February 3, 2010 notcategory=Disputed notcategory=No publish suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Wikinews:2010/February/3


text:
Portal:Australia/2010/February/3

 category=February 3, 2010 category=Published category=Australia notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:Australia/2010/February/3


text:
Portal:New Zealand/2010/February/3

 category=February 3, 2010 category=Published category=New Zealand notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:New Zealand/2010/February/3


text:
Category:February 4, 2010

de:Kategorie:04.02.2010 es:Categoría:4 de febrero de 2010 fr:Catégorie:4 février 2010 it:Categoria:4 febbraio 2010 hu:Kategória:2010. február 4. ja:カテゴリ:2010年2月4日 pl:Kategoria:4 lutego 2010 pt:Categoria:4 de fevereiro de 2010 ro:Categorie:4 februarie 2010 sr:Категорија:4. фебруар 2010. fi:Luokka:4. helmikuuta 2010 ta:பகுப்பு:பெப்ரவரி 4, 2010 zh:Category:2010年2月4日

title: Category:February 4, 2010


text:
Wikinews:2010/February/4

 category=Published category=February 4, 2010 notcategory=Disputed notcategory=No publish suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Wikinews:2010/February/4


text:
Portal:Australia/2010/February/4

 category=February 4, 2010 category=Published category=Australia notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:Australia/2010/February/4


text:
Portal:New Zealand/2010/February/4

 category=February 4, 2010 category=Published category=New Zealand notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:New Zealand/2010/February/4


text:
Category:February 5, 2010

de:Kategorie:05.02.2010 es:Categoría:5 de febrero de 2010 fr:Catégorie:5 février 2010 it:Categoria:5 febbraio 2010 hu:Kategória:2010. február 5. ja:Category:2010年2月5日 pl:Kategoria:5 lutego 2010 pt:Categoria:5 de fevereiro de 2010 ro:Categorie:5 februarie 2010 sr:Категорија:5. фебруар 2010. fi:Luokka:5. helmikuuta 2010 ta:பகுப்பு:பெப்ரவரி 5, 2010 zh:Category:2010年2月5日

title: Category:February 5, 2010


text:
Wikinews:2010/February/5

 category=Published category=February 5, 2010 notcategory=Disputed notcategory=No publish suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Wikinews:2010/February/5


text:
Portal:Australia/2010/February/5

 category=February 5, 2010 category=Published category=Australia notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:Australia/2010/February/5


text:
Portal:New Zealand/2010/February/5

 category=February 5, 2010 category=Published category=New Zealand notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:New Zealand/2010/February/5


text:
Category:February 6, 2010

de:Kategorie:06.02.2010 es:Categoría:6 de febrero de 2010 fr:Catégorie:6 février 2010 it:Categoria:6 febbraio 2010 hu:Kategória:2010. február 6. ja:Category:2010年2月6日 pl:Kategoria:6 lutego 2010 pt:Categoria:6 de fevereiro de 2010 ro:Categorie:6 februarie 2010 sr:Категорија:6. фебруар 2010. fi:Luokka:6. helmikuuta 2010 ta:பகுப்பு:பெப்ரவரி 6, 2010 zh:Category:2010年2月6日

title: Category:February 6, 2010


text:
Wikinews:2010/February/6

 category=Published category=February 6, 2010 notcategory=Disputed notcategory=No publish suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Wikinews:2010/February/6


text:
Portal:Australia/2010/February/6

 category=February 6, 2010 category=Published category=Australia notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:Australia/2010/February/6


text:
Portal:New Zealand/2010/February/6

 category=February 6, 2010 category=Published category=New Zealand notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:New Zealand/2010/February/6


text:
Category:February 7, 2010

cs:Kategorie:7. únor 2010 de:Kategorie:07.02.2010 es:Categoría:7 de febrero de 2010 fr:Catégorie:7 février 2010 it:Categoria:7 febbraio 2010 ja:カテゴリ:2010年2月7日 pl:Kategoria:7 lutego 2010 pt:Categoria:7 de fevereiro de 2010 ro:Categorie:7 februarie 2010 sr:Категорија:7. фебруар 2010. fi:Luokka:7. helmikuuta 2010 ta:பகுப்பு:பெப்ரவரி 7, 2010 zh:Category:2010年2月7日

title: Category:February 7, 2010


text:
Wikinews:2010/February/7

 category=Published category=February 7, 2010 notcategory=Disputed notcategory=No publish suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Wikinews:2010/February/7


text:
Portal:Australia/2010/February/7

 category=February 7, 2010 category=Published category=Australia notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:Australia/2010/February/7


text:
Portal:New Zealand/2010/February/7

 category=February 7, 2010 category=Published category=New Zealand notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:New Zealand/2010/February/7


text:
Category:February 8, 2010

de:Kategorie:08.02.2010 es:Categoría:8 de febrero de 2010 fr:Catégorie:8 février 2010 it:Categoria:8 febbraio 2010 hu:Kategória:2010. február 8. ja:カテゴリ:2010年2月8日 pl:Kategoria:8 lutego 2010 pt:Categoria:8 de fevereiro de 2010 ro:Categorie:8 februarie 2010 sr:Категорија:8. фебруар 2010. fi:Luokka:8. helmikuuta 2010 ta:பகுப்பு:பெப்ரவரி 8, 2010 zh:Category:2010年2月8日

title: Category:February 8, 2010


text:
Wikinews:2010/February/8

 category=Published category=February 8, 2010 notcategory=Disputed notcategory=No publish suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Wikinews:2010/February/8


text:
Portal:Australia/2010/February/8

 category=February 8, 2010 category=Published category=Australia notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:Australia/2010/February/8


text:
Portal:New Zealand/2010/February/8

 category=February 8, 2010 category=Published category=New Zealand notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:New Zealand/2010/February/8


text:
Category:February 9, 2010

de:Kategorie:09.02.2010 es:Categoría:9 de febrero de 2010 fr:Catégorie:9 février 2010 it:Categoria:9 febbraio 2010 hu:Kategória:2010. február 9. ja:カテゴリ:2010年2月9日 pl:Kategoria:9 lutego 2010 pt:Categoria:9 de fevereiro de 2010 ro:Categorie:9 februarie 2010 sr:Категорија:9. фебруар 2010. fi:Luokka:9. helmikuuta 2010 ta:பகுப்பு:பெப்ரவரி 9, 2010 zh:Category:2010年2月9日

title: Category:February 9, 2010


text:
Wikinews:2010/February/9

 category=Published category=February 9, 2010 notcategory=Disputed notcategory=No publish suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Wikinews:2010/February/9


text:
Portal:Australia/2010/February/9

 category=February 9, 2010 category=Published category=Australia notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:Australia/2010/February/9


text:
Portal:New Zealand/2010/February/9

 category=February 9, 2010 category=Published category=New Zealand notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:New Zealand/2010/February/9


text:
Category:February 10, 2010

de:Kategorie:10.02.2010 es:Categoría:10 de febrero de 2010 fr:Catégorie:10 février 2010 it:Categoria:10 febbraio 2010 hu:Kategória:2010. február 10. ja:Category:2010年2月10日 pl:Kategoria:10 lutego 2010 pt:Categoria:10 de fevereiro de 2010 ro:Categorie:10 februarie 2010 sr:Категорија:10. фебруар 2010. fi:Luokka:10. helmikuuta 2010 ta:பகுப்பு:பெப்ரவரி 10, 2010 tr:Kategori:2010/02/10 zh:Category:2010年2月10日

title: Category:February 10, 2010


text:
Wikinews:2010/February/10

 category=Published category=February 10, 2010 notcategory=Disputed notcategory=No publish suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Wikinews:2010/February/10


text:
Portal:Australia/2010/February/10

 category=February 10, 2010 category=Published category=Australia notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:Australia/2010/February/10


text:
Portal:New Zealand/2010/February/10

 category=February 10, 2010 category=Published category=New Zealand notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:New Zealand/2010/February/10


text:
Category:February 11, 2010

de:Kategorie:11.02.2010 es:Categoría:11 de febrero de 2010 fr:Catégorie:11 février 2010 it:Categoria:11 febbraio 2010 hu:Kategória:2010. február 11. ja:Category:2010年2月11日 pl:Kategoria:11 lutego 2010 pt:Categoria:11 de fevereiro de 2010 ro:Categorie:11 februarie 2010 sr:Категорија:11. фебруар 2010. fi:Luokka:11. helmikuuta 2010 ta:பகுப்பு:பெப்ரவரி 11, 2010 zh:Category:2010年2月11日

title: Category:February 11, 2010


text:
Wikinews:2010/February/11

 category=Published category=February 11, 2010 notcategory=Disputed notcategory=No publish suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Wikinews:2010/February/11


text:
Portal:Australia/2010/February/11

 category=February 11, 2010 category=Published category=Australia notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:Australia/2010/February/11


text:
Portal:New Zealand/2010/February/11

 category=February 11, 2010 category=Published category=New Zealand notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:New Zealand/2010/February/11


text:
Category:February 12, 2010

de:Kategorie:12.02.2010 es:Categoría:12 de febrero de 2010 fr:Catégorie:12 février 2010 it:Categoria:12 febbraio 2010 hu:Kategória:2010. február 12. ja:カテゴリ:2010年2月12日 pl:Kategoria:12 lutego 2010 pt:Categoria:12 de fevereiro de 2010 ro:Categorie:12 februarie 2010 sr:Категорија:12. фебруар 2010. fi:Luokka:12. helmikuuta 2010 ta:பகுப்பு:பெப்ரவரி 12, 2010 zh:Category:2010年2月12日

title: Category:February 12, 2010


text:
Wikinews:2010/February/12

 category=Published category=February 12, 2010 notcategory=Disputed notcategory=No publish suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Wikinews:2010/February/12


text:
Portal:Australia/2010/February/12

 category=February 12, 2010 category=Published category=Australia notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:Australia/2010/February/12


text:
Portal:New Zealand/2010/February/12

 category=February 12, 2010 category=Published category=New Zealand notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:New Zealand/2010/February/12


text:
Category:February 13, 2010

cs:Kategorie:13. únor 2010 de:Kategorie:13.02.2010 es:Categoría:13 de febrero de 2010 fr:Catégorie:13 février 2010 it:Categoria:13 febbraio 2010 ja:カテゴリ:2010年2月13日 pl:Kategoria:13 lutego 2010 pt:Categoria:13 de fevereiro de 2010 ro:Categorie:13 februarie 2010 ru:Категория:13 февраля 2010 sr:Категорија:13. фебруар 2010. fi:Luokka:13. helmikuuta 2010 ta:பகுப்பு:பெப்ரவரி 13, 2010 zh:Category:2010年2月13日

title: Category:February 13, 2010


text:
Wikinews:2010/February/13

 category=Published category=February 13, 2010 notcategory=Disputed notcategory=No publish suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Wikinews:2010/February/13


text:
Portal:Australia/2010/February/13

 category=February 13, 2010 category=Published category=Australia notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:Australia/2010/February/13


text:
Portal:New Zealand/2010/February/13

 category=February 13, 2010 category=Published category=New Zealand notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:New Zealand/2010/February/13


text:
Category:February 14, 2010

de:Kategorie:14.02.2010 es:Categoría:14 de febrero de 2010 fr:Catégorie:14 février 2010 it:Categoria:14 febbraio 2010 hu:Kategória:2010. február 14. ja:カテゴリ:2010年2月14日 pl:Kategoria:14 lutego 2010 pt:Categoria:14 de fevereiro de 2010 ro:Categorie:14 februarie 2010 sr:Категорија:14. фебруар 2010. fi:Luokka:14. helmikuuta 2010 ta:பகுப்பு:பெப்ரவரி 14, 2010 uk:Категорія:14 лютого 2010 zh:Category:2010年2月14日

title: Category:February 14, 2010


text:
Wikinews:2010/February/14

 category=Published category=February 14, 2010 notcategory=Disputed notcategory=No publish suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Wikinews:2010/February/14


text:
Portal:Australia/2010/February/14

 category=February 14, 2010 category=Published category=Australia notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:Australia/2010/February/14


text:
Portal:New Zealand/2010/February/14

 category=February 14, 2010 category=Published category=New Zealand notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:New Zealand/2010/February/14


text:
Category:February 15, 2010

de:Kategorie:15.02.2010 es:Categoría:15 de febrero de 2010 fr:Catégorie:15 février 2010 it:Categoria:15 febbraio 2010 hu:Kategória:2010. február 15. ja:Category:2010年2月15日 pl:Kategoria:15 lutego 2010 pt:Categoria:15 de fevereiro de 2010 ro:Categorie:15 februarie 2010 sr:Категорија:15. фебруар 2010. fi:Luokka:15. helmikuuta 2010 ta:பகுப்பு:பெப்ரவரி 15, 2010 tr:Kategori:2010/02/15 zh:Category:2010年2月15日

title: Category:February 15, 2010


text:
Wikinews:2010/February/15

 category=Published category=February 15, 2010 notcategory=Disputed notcategory=No publish suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Wikinews:2010/February/15


text:
Portal:Australia/2010/February/15

 category=February 15, 2010 category=Published category=Australia notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:Australia/2010/February/15


text:
Portal:New Zealand/2010/February/15

 category=February 15, 2010 category=Published category=New Zealand notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:New Zealand/2010/February/15


text:
Category:February 16, 2010

de:Kategorie:16.02.2010 es:Categoría:16 de febrero de 2010 fr:Catégorie:16 février 2010 it:Categoria:16 febbraio 2010 hu:Kategória:2010. február 16. ja:Category:2010年2月16日 pl:Kategoria:16 lutego 2010 pt:Categoria:16 de fevereiro de 2010 ro:Categorie:16 februarie 2010 sr:Категорија:16. фебруар 2010. fi:Luokka:16. helmikuuta 2010 ta:பகுப்பு:பெப்ரவரி 16, 2010 tr:Kategori:2010/02/16 zh:Category:2010年2月16日

title: Category:February 16, 2010


text:
Wikinews:2010/February/16

 category=Published category=February 16, 2010 notcategory=Disputed notcategory=No publish suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Wikinews:2010/February/16


text:
Portal:Australia/2010/February/16

 category=February 16, 2010 category=Published category=Australia notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:Australia/2010/February/16


text:
Portal:New Zealand/2010/February/16

 category=February 16, 2010 category=Published category=New Zealand notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:New Zealand/2010/February/16


text:
Category:February 17, 2010

de:Kategorie:17.02.2010 es:Categoría:17 de febrero de 2010 fr:Catégorie:17 février 2010 it:Categoria:17 febbraio 2010 hu:Kategória:2010. február 17. ja:カテゴリ:2010年2月17日 pl:Kategoria:17 lutego 2010 pt:Categoria:17 de fevereiro de 2010 ro:Categorie:17 februarie 2010 sr:Категорија:17. фебруар 2010. fi:Luokka:17. helmikuuta 2010 ta:பகுப்பு:பெப்ரவரி 17, 2010 zh:Category:2010年2月17日

title: Category:February 17, 2010


text:
Wikinews:2010/February/17

 category=Published category=February 17, 2010 notcategory=Disputed notcategory=No publish suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Wikinews:2010/February/17


text:
Portal:Australia/2010/February/17

 category=February 17, 2010 category=Published category=Australia notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:Australia/2010/February/17


text:
Portal:New Zealand/2010/February/17

 category=February 17, 2010 category=Published category=New Zealand notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:New Zealand/2010/February/17


text:
Category:February 18, 2010

cs:Kategorie:18. únor 2010 de:Kategorie:18.02.2010 es:Categoría:18 de febrero de 2010 fr:Catégorie:18 février 2010 it:Categoria:18 febbraio 2010 ja:カテゴリ:2010年2月18日 pl:Kategoria:18 lutego 2010 pt:Categoria:18 de fevereiro de 2010 ro:Categorie:18 februarie 2010 sr:Категорија:18. фебруар 2010. fi:Luokka:18. helmikuuta 2010 ta:பகுப்பு:பெப்ரவரி 18, 2010 zh:Category:2010年2月18日

title: Category:February 18, 2010


text:
Wikinews:2010/February/18

 category=Published category=February 18, 2010 notcategory=Disputed notcategory=No publish suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Wikinews:2010/February/18


text:
Portal:Australia/2010/February/18

 category=February 18, 2010 category=Published category=Australia notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:Australia/2010/February/18


text:
Portal:New Zealand/2010/February/18

 category=February 18, 2010 category=Published category=New Zealand notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:New Zealand/2010/February/18


text:
Category:February 19, 2010

de:Kategorie:19.02.2010 es:Categoría:19 de febrero de 2010 fr:Catégorie:19 février 2010 it:Categoria:19 febbraio 2010 hu:Kategória:2010. február 19. ja:カテゴリ:2010年2月19日 pl:Kategoria:19 lutego 2010 pt:Categoria:19 de fevereiro de 2010 ro:Categorie:19 februarie 2010 ru:Категория:19 февраля 2010 sr:Категорија:19. фебруар 2010. fi:Luokka:19. helmikuuta 2010 ta:பகுப்பு:பெப்ரவரி 19, 2010 zh:Category:2010年2月19日

title: Category:February 19, 2010


text:
Wikinews:2010/February/19

 category=Published category=February 19, 2010 notcategory=Disputed notcategory=No publish suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Wikinews:2010/February/19


text:
Portal:Australia/2010/February/19

 category=February 19, 2010 category=Published category=Australia notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:Australia/2010/February/19


text:
Portal:New Zealand/2010/February/19

 category=February 19, 2010 category=Published category=New Zealand notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:New Zealand/2010/February/19


text:
Category:February 20, 2010

de:Kategorie:20.02.2010 es:Categoría:20 de febrero de 2010 fr:Catégorie:20 février 2010 it:Categoria:20 febbraio 2010 hu:Kategória:2010. február 20. ja:カテゴリ:2010年2月20日 no:Kategori:20. februar 2010 pl:Kategoria:20 lutego 2010 pt:Categoria:20 de fevereiro de 2010 ro:Categorie:20 februarie 2010 ru:Категория:20 февраля 2010 sr:Категорија:20. фебруар 2010. fi:Luokka:20. helmikuuta 2010 ta:பகுப்பு:பெப்ரவரி 20, 2010 tr:Kategori:2010/02/20 zh:Category:2010年2月20日

title: Category:February 20, 2010


text:
Wikinews:2010/February/20

 category=Published category=February 20, 2010 notcategory=Disputed notcategory=No publish suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Wikinews:2010/February/20