text:
User talk:Schrodinger's cat is alive

-- 19:43, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Schrodinger's cat is alive


text:
User talk:Cvilanova

-- 19:54, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: User talk:Cvilanova


text:
User talk:Star727hristo

-- 20:14, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Star727hristo


text:
User talk:Homologia

-- 20:15, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Homologia


text:
User talk:Silvia.brocc

-- 20:17, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Silvia.brocc


text:
User talk:Mathitis

-- 20:45, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mathitis


text:
User talk:Thabeatnik

-- 21:13, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Thabeatnik


text:
User talk:Tami tami

-- 21:14, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tami tami


text:
User talk:Akef soufan

-- 21:17, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Akef soufan


text:
User talk:Kunninasseril

-- 21:22, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kunninasseril


text:
User talk:Stojanovic marija

-- 21:35, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Stojanovic marija


text:
User talk:Kamenskiyan

-- 21:44, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kamenskiyan


text:
User talk:Gastfil

-- 21:46, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gastfil


text:
User talk:Duperman01

-- 21:52, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Duperman01


text:
User talk:Mfernandes1

-- 21:55, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mfernandes1


text:
User talk:Obimiquel

-- 22:37, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Obimiquel


text:
User talk:Jaardon

-- 22:50, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jaardon


text:
User talk:Juan D' Gonzalez

-- 22:56, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Juan D' Gonzalez


text:
User talk:Sudology

-- 23:07, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sudology


text:
User talk:Carlossony

-- 23:16, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Carlossony


text:
User talk:Watchoutdeepa

-- 23:24, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Watchoutdeepa


text:
User talk:Oxford Menace

-- 23:30, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Oxford Menace


text:
User talk:Youknow84

-- 23:57, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Youknow84


text:
User talk:Mahalia80

-- 00:01, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mahalia80


text:
New York executive files $60 million libel lawsuit over insurance scandal

August 23, 2011

A former executive has hit former New York Governor Eliot Spitzer with a $60 million defamation lawsuit over an online magazine article regarding an insurance bid-rigging scandal.

William Gilman, a former Marsh managing director, filed a complaint last Friday in the U.S. District Court in, over allegations Mr. Spitzer defamed him in a  article published a year ago. A copy of the complaint was made public on Monday.

Gilman, who had a final insurance fraud charge dismissed in January, said Spitzer acted with “actual malice” by suggesting that he was guilty of crimes of which he was never accused.

Although he wasn't named in the article, Mr. Gilman complained that Spitzer defamed him by writing that “Marsh’s behavior was a blatant abuse of law and market power: price-fixing, bid-rigging and kickbacks all designed to harm their customers and the market while Marsh and its employees pocketed the increased fees and kickbacks.”

“While Mr. Spitzer’s statements do not refer to Mr. Gilman by name, Mr. Gilman is readily identifiable as the subject of the defamatory comments," said the complaint. "Mr. Spitzer was well aware of his own allegations as attorney general and the resolution of those allegations in favor of Mr. Gilman and yet, recklessly disregarded these facts."

In 2004 Mr. Spizter, then the state's Attorney General, announced an investigation into the practices at Marsh & McLennan, particularly fees paid by insures to brokers who place business with them. Gilman, who worked for the company at the time, was charged in 2005 with 37 counts of insurance fraud. Gilman’s final charge was dropped last January.

"I haven't seen the lawsuit and so will not comment on it,” said Spitzer. "The illegalities rampant at Marsh & McLennan leading to their fine of $850 million and the multiple judicial findings of illegality are clear from the public record."

Mr. Gilman is now seeking at least $10 million in compensatory damages; $20 million in general damages, including damage to his reputation; and $30 million in punitive damages.


text:
User talk:Blueages24

-- 00:21, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Blueages24


text:
User talk:Eugén Jung

-- 00:27, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Eugén Jung


text:
User talk:Marce~enwikinews

-- 00:28, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Marce. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Marce~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:21, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:34, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Marce~enwikinews


text:
User talk:Stylestaf

-- 00:34, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Stylestaf


text:
User talk:Harry0088888

-- 00:37, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Harry0088888


text:
User talk:Jorkao

-- 00:55, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jorkao


text:
User talk:Kishoresatyaa

-- 00:59, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kishoresatyaa


text:
User talk:Soniczaragoza

-- 01:16, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Soniczaragoza


text:
User talk:Fraxtil

-- 01:17, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Fraxtil


text:
User talk:Cardiffchestnut

-- 01:21, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Cardiffchestnut


text:
User talk:Ranndy Hernandez

-- 01:56, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ranndy Hernandez


text:
User talk:モンゴメリー

-- 01:59, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:モンゴメリー


text:
Talk:Former Wikileaks employee destroys unpublished leaked documents

Review of revision 1276675 [Passed]

 * There's additional copyedit post-review that probably merits being looked over by both contributor and reviewer. The cut'n' paste from some word processor brought in odd quote characters; plus, the use of ellipsis was inappropriate. A few other issues with needing more active wording too. --Brian McNeil / talk 00:11, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

A factual error
editprotected According to the Sydney Morning Herald article (see paragraph starting with "In his book released this year"), in the book he said why he "took away files" not why he has "destroyed" them (see "he revealed his motives for destroying the files" in our article). When fixing this, could you even interlink the Italian translation it:Impiegato di Wikileaks distrugge documenti non ancora pubblicati. Thanks -- Codicorumus « msg 16:08, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
 * What you're missing is he took away files and the keys they were encrypted with. By subsequently destroying the encryption keys, he's rendered the files inaccessible. Thus, the article is substantively correct. If - given it's before 7am - I am missing something else which merits a correction, please be a little more specific. --Brian McNeil / talk 06:28, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * On second thought, not a big issue, probably. Maybe because I'm not fluent in English, I read "In his book published this year, 'Inside Wikileaks', he revealed his motives for destroying the files and taking the encrypted system" as saying that in the book there are the reasons for the actual destruction and not only those which later led to the destruction. If it is not: no issue at all :) -- Codicorumus  « msg 07:00, 10 December 2011 (UTC)


text: Comments:Former Wikileaks employee destroys unpublished leaked documents


text:
User talk:Mercutio84110

-- 02:16, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mercutio84110


text:
User talk:Teraicozaburo

-- 02:31, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Teraicozaburo


text:
User talk:Sobrebarriga

-- 02:47, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sobrebarriga


text:
User talk:Grace bohrer

-- 02:48, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Grace bohrer


text:
User talk:Skydead

-- 02:49, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Skydead


text:
User talk:Shan2012

-- 03:09, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Shan2012


text:
User talk:Parasons

-- 03:11, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Parasons


text:
User talk:SGP-SV-TNK...Takatsuki

-- 03:14, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:SGP-SV-TNK...Takatsuki


text:
User talk:LibelousSquare

-- 03:19, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:LibelousSquare


text:
User talk:Emcc

-- 03:37, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Emcc


text:
User talk:Pascaglia

-- 03:37, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Pascaglia


text:
User talk:Idbdl2009

-- 04:02, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Idbdl2009


text:
User talk:An-d

-- 04:07, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:An-d


text:
User talk:Djaliloche

-- 04:25, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Djaliloche


text:
User talk:Shantanu.lamdhade

-- 04:25, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Shantanu.lamdhade


text:
User talk:ANUBHOOTI CHOUHAN

-- 04:26, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:ANUBHOOTI CHOUHAN


text:
User talk:DeMonsoon

-- 04:32, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:DeMonsoon


text:
User talk:Victor Osvaldo Gajardo Maldonado

-- 04:47, 23 August 2011 (UTC)


text: Comments:Microsoft changes OEM license, forcing new purchases after motherboard upgrade


text:
Thread:Comments:Microsoft changes OEM license, forcing new purchases after motherboard upgrade/Comments from feedback form - "nice"

nice —122.164.254.58 (talk) 04:48, 23 August 2011 (UTC)


text:
User talk:Mahindapala

-- 04:56, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mahindapala


text:
User talk:Matustin

-- 05:08, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Matustin


text:
User talk:U109

-- 05:10, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:U109


text:
User talk:RusGameTactics

-- 05:22, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:RusGameTactics


text:
Thread:Comments:Author Amy Scobee recounts abuse as Scientology executive/Treatment of Amy Scobee after publication of her book, Scientology - Abuse at the Top ?/reply (11)

cameowalkin - just saw this post today and wanted to thank you. I am continuing to expose their criminality.


text:
User talk:Naomih

-- 06:14, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Naomih


text:
User talk:NAPOLEON40

-- 06:30, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:NAPOLEON40


text:
User talk:Alekberk

-- 06:35, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Alekberk


text:
User talk:Philip Taron

-- 06:52, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Philip Taron


text:
User talk:Jerseyshop

-- 06:52, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jerseyshop


text:
User talk:Senorita~enwikinews

-- 07:01, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Senorita. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Senorita~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:29, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:36, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Senorita~enwikinews


text:
User talk:Trinhkientrung

-- 07:07, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Trinhkientrung


text:
User talk:Sugiman batuhitam

-- 07:41, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sugiman batuhitam


text:
User talk:Ssoulakiotis

-- 07:55, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ssoulakiotis


text:
User talk:Arhanta

-- 07:59, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Arhanta


text:
User talk:Chungdanganh

-- 08:03, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Chungdanganh


text:
User talk:Swiss Energy

-- 08:10, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Swiss Energy


text:
User talk:SavinSav

-- 08:17, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:SavinSav


text:
User talk:Commandandconquergenerals

-- 08:18, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Commandandconquergenerals


text:
User talk:Steebo99

-- 08:29, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Steebo99


text:
User talk:Stemby

-- 08:50, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Stemby


text:
User talk:Dionbouton

-- 09:01, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dionbouton


text:
User talk:Gad8282

-- 09:19, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gad8282


text:
User talk:Fsagasdga

-- 09:21, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Fsagasdga


text:
User talk:Rodina.lv

-- 09:35, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rodina.lv


text:
User talk:Apuldram

-- 09:41, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Apuldram


text:
User talk:Takaya3523a

-- 09:46, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Takaya3523a


text:
User talk:Ghaletreks

-- 10:04, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ghaletreks


text:
User talk:Gleerachelqueenfan

-- 10:09, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gleerachelqueenfan


text:
User talk:Dovanbang99

-- 10:10, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dovanbang99


text:
User talk:SarasotaDreams

-- 10:17, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:SarasotaDreams


text:
User talk:Kanchan.bhukesh

-- 10:31, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kanchan.bhukesh


text:
User talk:Klima34

-- 10:37, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Klima34


text:
User talk:Levonscott

-- 11:08, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Levonscott


text:
Japan nuclear disaster: areas to remain off-limits for decades

August 25, 2011 Japanese officials have admitted for the first time that certain radiation-stricken areas around the crippled may remain uninhabitable for decades. Japanese media this week reported that embattled Prime Minister Naoto Kan is to visit affected areas within days to tell residents and local officials that it will remain too dangerous to return to parts of Fukushima Prefecture in the foreseeable future.

Chief Cabinet Secretary Yukio Edano said, "We cannot deny the possibility that there will be some areas where it will be hard for residents to return to their homes over a long period of time."

The dangers of in certain areas are expected to remain unacceptably high well after the plant finally undergoes a  in the coming months. A final decision on which areas are to be declared off-limits will be made following detailed radiation monitoring and the creation of a comprehensive decontamination plan. Japanese officials have so far declined to specifically name any areas likely to be affected.

Scientists have for months warned of such an eventuality following the meltdown of three reactors at the Fukushima site in March. The government, criticised for its management of evacuations in the wake of the disaster, had hoped to lift current evacuation orders for most areas around the plant. However, it cannot do so amidst dangerously elevated radiation readings, including in the town of, situated about three kilometres from the Fukushima site, where cumulative radiation levels are over 25 times higher than government-mandated limits.

Media reports have also focused on uncertainty surrounding compensation for the many thousands of residents affected by the ongoing evacuations. The government may possibly purchase or rent the properties of those who cannot return to their homes and businesses.

Although the plant operator, the Tokyo Electric Power Company, has recently claimed radiation leaks from all three reactors have declined, concern continues to mount over the true scale of contamination. Scientists have detected widespread contamination of topsoil on agricultural land, further jeopardising the future habitability of significant areas, and uncertainty remains as to the true extent of radioactivity in numerous areas.

“, the main radioactive element thrown out during the various explosions, has a half-life of 30 years, and it is not going to disappear overnight,” said Didier Champion, a French nuclear safety expert.


text:
User talk:Ntudreamer

-- 11:19, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ntudreamer


text:
User talk:DMcGookinUOW

-- 11:25, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Missouri Teacher suing State over the breaking of the First Amendment
The above submission needs work if you intend to try and save it from being deleted as stale. It should follow the inverse pyramid format for layout; it should answer as many of the Five Ws as possible in the lede, and it should not assume that readers know the story background. --Brian McNeil / talk 11:45, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Wikimedians to the Games
Hi. :) As you're an Australian contributor, I thought you might be interested in Wikimedians to the Games, which is an opportunity to cover the Paralympic Games as a member of the press. As you've experience writing Wikinews articles, this should give you a leg up. :)  LauraHale (talk) 08:34, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:DMcGookinUOW


text:
User talk:00raiser123

-- 11:35, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:00raiser123


text:
User talk:Absinthologue

-- 11:51, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Absinthologue


text:
Thread:Comments:Former Wikileaks employee destroys unpublished leaked documents/Comments from feedback form - "Very well written, very compre..."

Very well written, very comprehensive, very insightful. I would not have known about this issue if it wasn't for uowakm.


text:
User talk:Horizontsultan

-- 12:08, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Horizontsultan


text:
User talk:Easy2own

-- 12:11, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Easy2own


text:
User talk:Deepak-nsk

-- 12:13, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Deepak-nsk


text:
User talk:Lupusmaximus

-- 12:13, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lupusmaximus


text: User:DMcGookinUOW

title: User:DMcGookinUOW


text:
User talk:HeshamAllam

-- 12:17, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:HeshamAllam


text:
User talk:Springloaded

-- 12:19, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Springloaded


text:
User talk:Sophia genido

-- 12:36, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sophia genido


text:
User talk:Triinu lille

-- 12:38, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Triinu lille


text:
User talk:Olgawatkins

-- 12:46, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Olgawatkins


text:
User talk:Ajitvg17

-- 13:03, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ajitvg17


text:
User talk:Jmchutchinson

-- 13:07, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jmchutchinson


text:
User talk:Tusharpelec

-- 13:12, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tusharpelec


text:
User talk:Anandtamilnadu

-- 13:24, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Anandtamilnadu


text:
User talk:SirZidan

-- 13:29, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:SirZidan


text:
User talk:Duru Cyprian

-- 13:43, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Duru Cyprian


text:
User talk:JV076Sunardi

-- 13:48, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:JV076Sunardi


text:
User talk:TSLMVNE

-- 14:00, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:TSLMVNE


text:
User talk:P100

-- 14:06, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:P100


text:
User talk:Gilbertryan

-- 14:14, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gilbertryan


text: Talk:Pakistan government must investigate killings and abductions of journalists, says UN


text: Comments:Pakistan government must investigate killings and abductions of journalists, says UN


text:
User talk:Nico1131

-- 14:20, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nico1131


text:
User talk:Malikshabir21

-- 14:22, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Malikshabir21


text:
Thread:Comments:Egypt recalls envoy in Israel/Comments from feedback form - "Israel does not attack Palesti..."

Israel does not attack Palestinians; they attack terrorists, who constantly try to kill Israelis as much as they can. Egypt, which knows it cannot attack Israel openly, supports these terrorists, as do other oil-rich arab nations.


text:
User talk:Sergbeg

-- 14:33, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sergbeg


text:
User talk:Bala8vijay

-- 14:42, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bala8vijay


text:
User talk:Lucas Diógenes de Souza Taciano

-- 14:55, 23 August 2011 (UTC)


text:
User talk:Lord monster2

-- 15:06, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lord monster2


text:
User talk:Dolong duky

-- 15:07, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dolong duky


text:
User talk:Fasteddi

-- 15:08, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Fasteddi


text:
User talk:EdiTurn

-- 15:15, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:EdiTurn


text:
User talk:Mekryd

-- 15:19, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mekryd


text:
User talk:EnterimageANUS

-- 15:25, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:EnterimageANUS


text: User talk:IEnjoyMaleBodyParts

title: User talk:IEnjoyMaleBodyParts


text: User talk:ILikeGorillaPubes

title: User talk:ILikeGorillaPubes


text:
User talk:Shazma nisar

-- 15:33, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Shazma nisar


text:
User talk:Ami mehta

-- 15:38, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ami mehta


text:
User talk:Manso nightmare

-- 15:47, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Manso nightmare


text:
User talk:Deepan005

-- 15:48, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Deepan005


text:
User talk:Dynomat

-- 15:51, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dynomat


text:
User talk:Gabipapa51

-- 15:53, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gabipapa51


text:
User talk:Lsyx1988

-- 16:08, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lsyx1988


text:
User talk:Hmy

-- 16:14, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hmy


text:
User talk:Knez Mihajlo

-- 16:16, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Knez Mihajlo


text:
User talk:GoodBoy-A

-- 16:18, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:GoodBoy-A


text:
User talk:Giorgio.nicoli

-- 16:35, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Giorgio.nicoli


text:
User talk:Sachin patole

-- 16:50, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sachin patole


text:
User talk:Rocío99

-- 17:05, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rocío99


text:
User talk:Knowledgeman800

-- 17:06, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Knowledgeman800


text:
User talk:Carmenlevalle

-- 17:15, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Carmenlevalle


text:
User talk:Tribbleslayer

-- 17:17, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tribbleslayer


text:
User talk:Cltomasi

-- 17:19, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Cltomasi


text: Talk:New York executive files $60 million libel lawsuit over insurance scandal


text: Comments:New York executive files $60 million libel lawsuit over insurance scandal


text:
User talk:Jj123~enwikinews

-- 17:28, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Jj123. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Jj123~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:19, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:32, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jj123~enwikinews


text:
User talk:Ipodkiller

-- 17:28, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ipodkiller


text:
User talk:Pdarshi

-- 17:46, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Pdarshi


text:
User talk:Kalidass87

-- 17:49, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kalidass87


text:
User talk:Utsav0007

-- 17:53, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Utsav0007


text:
User talk:Mysterytrey

-- 17:58, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mysterytrey


text:
User talk:Mediator Scientiae

-- 17:58, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mediator Scientiae


text:
User talk:Qawhaposanor

-- 18:01, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Qawhaposanor


text:
Magnitude 5.8 earthquake in Virginia felt up and down U.S. east coast, Pentagon evacuated

August 23, 2011

A 5.8 earthquake struck 4 miles southwest of, Virginia, 80 miles south of Washington D.C., at 1:51 p.m. (17:51 UTC) and lasted for 15–30 seconds. The quake had a magnitude of 5.8 with an epicenter east of, Virginia. A 2.8 aftershock was reported at 2:46 pm EDT (18:46 UTC).

According to Twitter reports, the quake was felt inland as far as Cleveland and Toronto and along the coast from Boston to Georgia. Police sergeant James Ryan, from, New Jersey stated that "The 911 line is flooding with calls right now. People want to know what happened. They want to know if there was an explosion."

The United States Capitol and in  were evacuated, as were police headquarters and city hall in New York City. Numerous minor injuries have been reported in Washington, D.C.; however, none of them are serious. There have been confirmed reports of damage at the and the. The Pentagon was also damaged when a burst pipe caused flooding. The lost offsite power and had to shut down, turning to four diesel generators to maintain cooling of the facility. Both the and  airports were briefly shut down and the control towers were evacuated. A release from Amtrak stated that trains will be operating at reduced speed, but no damage has been found on any rail lines. The is also operating on reduced speed, with some stations closed down, while lines are evaluated.

In Boston, it was reported that the building at 111 Devonshire Street appeared to be leaning onto the adjacent building at 50 Milk Street, with fears that it could collapse. The street was blocked off while the Boston Fire Department investigated. However, it was determined that the buildings had always appeared like that. Nevertheless, the Boston Fire Department investigated the roof and the inside of 111 Devonshire St. After 30 minutes, the building was determined to be safe.

This is the second strongest earthquake to originate in Virginia since records have been kept, after the one recorded on May 31, 1897, near, which was estimated at a magnitude of 5.9. The initially dropped 50 points after the earthquake struck, but later increased over 100 points.


text:
Talk:Magnitude 5.8 earthquake in Virginia felt up and down U.S. east coast, Pentagon evacuated

Twitter reports from as far north as New Hampshire, early indications are a 5.4 magnitude quake centered near Richmond, VA. LtPowers (talk) 18:03, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
 * CNN says 5.8. LtPowers (talk) 18:08, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
 * USGS says 5.9. --Mdennis (WMF) (talk) 18:16, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Merge
In terms of merge, wouldn't this title or some combo title make more sense? The magnitude of the earthquake is good to include, but it was felt in far more than Washington. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:34, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Does anyone know exactly how a merge is usually performed on Wikinews?Ryan Vesey (talk) 18:42, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Sure. This article (the one we're discussing) has been already published, so all other redundant articles have to be merged into this article. The sources used in the other article should be added to this article's list of sources. Ragettho (talk) 18:46, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Ok, I added the sources and am merging useful content.Ryan Vesey (talk) 18:48, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

 * Why is the title "near Washington, D.C." when the quake was pretty solidly in Virginia? Isn't that likely to be confusing? It was 100 miles from D.C. :/ --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:49, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
 * It should read like "earthquake near Charlottesville, VA..." It has been downgraded to 5.8, but numbers have not been updated online.
 * I changed it to "in Virginia". Initially I was following a source that said "near Washington", but "in Virginia" now makes much more sense. Ragettho (talk)

Speculation
Possible speculation that Washington Monument is tilting http://foxnewsinsider.com/tag/washington-monument/ I assume we should wait for some more confirmation.Ryan Vesey (talk) 18:56, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Fox News
The amtrak information cited Fox News was seen on TV.Ryan Vesey (talk) 19:25, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

OR note
I was in Boston yesterday. Happened to be right down the street from this building which had concerns it may collapse. Turns out it always appeared that way. Anyways, photo added with a source to back up what I heard, which at times was conflicting. --Patrick M (TUFKAAP) (talk) 14:28, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Some concerns
First of all, the article was published when it was only one paragraph long, I believe the articles have to be at least two paragraphs long in breaking news situations, and three paragraphs long normally. Secondly, the reviewer added original report content, there were no real twitter sources provided but a short summary by a user that had rarely edited before the creation of this article, so far. The reviewer later reviewed his and another user's changes; the other user's changes may be acceptable, but reviewing his are not. Also, why are there so many sources in the article? Are they all really necessary? アンパロ Io ti odio! 20:01, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

 * I agree, the article when published was too short to publish.
 * That second edit is addition of unverified information — there are no detailed reporter's notes as required for OR. As you point out, the user in question is not someone with a reputation at Wikinews, nor elsewhere I have to interject here.  The user you are trashing is Moonriddengirl, one of the most respected Wikipedians.  In fact, she is currently an employee of the Wikimedia Foundation Ryan Vesey (talk) 21:34, 24 August 2011 (UTC) — there's no unified account, so it doesn't signify that there are well-established accounts on other sister projects with the same name.  Personal reputation being a cornerstone of Wikinews that (in our profound form) is totally missing from the Wikipedian hive mindset, and probably is why some Wikipedians thing we're either insane, corrupt, or both.
 * The sighting of that third edit does, indeed, self-publish the aforementioned unverified information.
 * Mistakes were made here. The first two could be simple shortfall of experience; we all have to learn these things at some point.  I don't know what to make of the third one; it's potentially by far the most troubling, but that potential depends on what Ragettho's side of the story is.  So I really want to hear Ragettho's side of that story.  --Pi zero (talk) 20:43, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

 * Oh, I think I can answer that last bit, about the number of sources. Information was, I understand, incrementally added, with sources coming along with the new information.  There are actually a great many comments in the article (you'll see, if you edit it) identifying which source specific details came from.  Ragettho was concerned enough about keeping track of it all that xe asked me, at one point, if I could do an independent review to double-check xem — but xe and I both separately came to the conclusion it probably wasn't practical.  --Pi zero (talk) 20:47, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

 * Question for アンパロ on sources Why should there not be that many sources?  Should an entire wikinews article be based on only two sources?  That cuts out a lot of information.Ryan Vesey (talk) 21:37, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

 * (injecting a remark) The key question was whether they're really necessary; I suggested that every source on the list was probably used at the time that the corresponding information was incrementally added. Making them, presumably, necessary.  --Pi zero (talk) 21:45, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry. Its just that I have contributed twice to Wikinews and it seems like both times I (and others) have been criticized for being new; rather than receiving assistance for editing in the future.Ryan Vesey (talk) 21:54, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Hm? I wasn't criticizing you, I was offering information.  Did it seem like criticism from your side?  If it looked different from your side, that could be due to a cultural mismatch between Wikipedia and Wikinews — Wikipedia has AGF while Wikinews has accumulated personal reputation.  With Wikipedian AGF, one is immediately treated about as well as one can be, until and unless one takes heroic measures to earn mistrust.  But on Wikinews, we start out with open minds about you, and it's possible to work up from there to levels of individual reputation that are simply inconceivable within the Wikipedian framework.  But again, it's accumulated reputation.

 * Case in point: The user we're talking about who provided the twitter claim here is not being trashed; they simply haven't yet accumulated reputation here. (The user also isn't Moonriddengirl; we do know Moodriddengirl, but this is LtPowers we're talking about, and as I noted, there's no unified account so we don't know whether this is the same user as has accounts on en.wp and commons.)  Of course, that lack of accumulated reputation is only one small issue in all this; even if Moonriddengirl had provided that information, there should have been proper OR notes, and it was the reviewers responsibility not to accept the article content without such notes.  --Pi zero (talk) 22:15, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

 * WN:SG says "If there is significant breaking news whose article is likely to be expanded, do go ahead and write a short (but useful!) summary as breaking news, and tag it with breaking review." Publishing a short article like this was not a violation of current guidelines.
 * I did not add OR content. If you take a look at the diff, you'll see that I added a note saying that the info came from CNN. Furthermore, even if I did use the OR notes provided by LtPowers above, there wouldn't be a credibility issue because that user is active on at least two Wikimedia projects. (WP userpage)
 * I was hoping to leave my edit as "pending" and just sight subsequent revisions. I wasn't sure whether that worked or not (I had a feeling that it didn't), but I continued to review subsequent revisions because I was available to review them, other reviewers did not seem to be available, and the number of edits that needed to be sighted continued to grow quickly. There was not enough time to wait for another reviewer to check my edit. Furthermore, Moonriddengirl, Ryan Vesey, and particularly Kainaw, who are all respected contributors in other projects, continued to update the article to reflect further developments in the story. As such, the article — including my own text — has effectively been reviewed by multiple, reputable contributors. Ragettho (talk) 22:21, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Miscellaneous points.
 * I'd completely missed the point about CNN, and evidently so did Diego. Point taken.
 * We're suggesting it should have been a bit longer than that before being published.
 * I do understand your sense of need to review subsequent edits in fairly real time. The solution is to remove the stuff you can't self-sight, and review and sight a version later than the removal.
 * Although I do understand that you're glad to have had multiple eyes working on the article (so would I be!), don't lose track of the crucial fact those other people aren't reviewers. There are many facets to "reputation" that go into the Wikinews community's assignment of the reviewer bit [struck out: simplify], and you can't delegate your responsibility for the article; you were in fact the only reviewer on the scene.
 * [struck out: true but pointlessly argumentative] "Not time to wait for another reviewer" is, of course, not an acceptable reason for self-sighting; I do understand about not being sure whether one could sight a later edit without sighting an earlier one. I often wish we had the technical ability to do that.  [struck out: simplify] Again, the practical way around it is to take out the material you can't sight, then go through the other changes incrementally (without sighting intermediate steps) until you get up to the point in the edit history where you removed what you can't self-sight, and once you have a review-passing version that doesn't have the stuff you can't self-sight, sight that version.
 * The point about LtPowers doesn't matter in the event, because as you point out it was from CNN, but I note there's no obvious evidence that LtPowers is the same user who has those accounts on other projects, because there's no SUL for LtPowers. It took me a long time to learn how to check that.  Go to their contributions page, here Special:Contributions/LtPowers, and down at the bottom find a toolserver link for "SUL"; click it, and you get a page that lists accounts on other projects and notes there's no SUL.
 * --Pi zero (talk) 23:13, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
 * As usual when I foolishly rush myself, I come across sounding pompous, and consequently overly critical. I hate several portions of the above, which have grains of truth in them but come across way too strong; there's little I can do now, but I've tried to make it slightly less horrible by striking out some passages.  --Pi zero (talk) 23:54, 24 August 2011 (UTC)


text:
User talk:Mickhowroyd

-- 18:06, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mickhowroyd


text:
User:Mediator Scientiae

Quickie userpage, might update later. I've just written my first story, please leave comments on my talk page etc.

title: User:Mediator Scientiae


text: Comments:Social networks asked to visit UK Home Office after riots


text:
User talk:Anatolnsk

-- 18:28, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Anatolnsk


text: Comments:Magnitude 5.8 earthquake in Virginia felt up and down U.S. east coast, Pentagon evacuated


text:
User talk:Devin.chaloux

-- 18:37, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Devin.chaloux


text:
User talk:MrGachapon

-- 18:38, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:MrGachapon


text:
User talk:Wyjay

-- 18:39, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Wyjay


text:
User talk:Alt229

-- 18:43, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Alt229


text:
User talk:Rob.J.Will

-- 18:49, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rob.J.Will


text:
User talk:Raul.moreira

-- 18:51, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Raul.moreira


text:
User talk:Sbaush

-- 18:55, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sbaush


text:
User talk:Ajohunt

-- 19:05, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ajohunt


text:
User:Ryan Vesey

I'm tired of the red link. I usually edit at Wikipedia, and occasionally edit here. Mostly for breaking news.

Articles I have created

 * 1) Apple executive Steve Jobs resigns
 * 2) Man arrested for raping his two daughters for 41 years

Articles I have substantially contributed to

 * 1) Magnitude 5.8 earthquake in Virginia felt up and down U.S. east coast, Pentagon evacuated

title: User:Ryan Vesey


text:
User talk:Moonriddengirl

Hi
I just wanted to say hi and that it is slightly interesting that your first major contribution to Wikinews and my first major contribution was on the same article.Ryan Vesey (talk) 19:14, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi. :) First time I've ever felt an earthquake! I don't half know what I'm doing, but I'm trying to pick it up. :D --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:15, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Welcome!
Tyrol5 (talk) 19:16, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

earthquake article
Hey! It was a pleasure working with you all on this! Wikinews and Wikipedia work differently for sure, but I'm glad we were all able to put together a well-crafted article on this breaking news story. :) Cheers, Ragettho (talk) 21:26, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

If you plan to edit in the future...
I was wondering if you knew about the ability to include your watchlist from other Wikimedia projects on your Wikipedia watchlist.Ryan Vesey (talk) 21:34, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Moonriddengirl


text:
User talk:Rezpe

-- 19:15, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rezpe


text:
User talk:MadeYourReadThis

-- 19:18, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:MadeYourReadThis


text:
User talk:Atomician

-- 19:21, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Atomician


text:
User talk:Tone Show

-- 19:26, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tone Show


text:
User talk:Bekus

-- 19:26, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bekus


text:
User talk:Electrical & computer engineer

-- 19:35, 23 August 2011 (UTC)


text:
User talk:Actinium15

-- 19:36, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Actinium15


text:
User talk:Sansardu

-- 19:40, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sansardu


text:
User talk:Jekbradbury

-- 19:44, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jekbradbury


text:
User talk:Walt76020

-- 19:48, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Walt76020


text:
User talk:Drayy

-- 19:48, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Drayy


text:
User:Marshallsumter

WikiMedia user pages

 * Norse Wikipedia
 * Wikibooks
 * Wikimedia Commons
 * Wikimedia Meta-Wiki
 * Wikimedia Toolserver Wiki
 * Wikipedia
 * Wikiquote
 * Wikisource
 * Wikispecies
 * Wikiversity
 * Wiktionary

title: User:Marshallsumter


text:
User talk:Hjaekel

-- 19:53, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hjaekel


text:
User talk:Naive cynic

-- 20:11, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Naive cynic


text:
User talk:Stevekass

-- 20:12, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Stevekass


text:
User talk:Elpincha

-- 20:13, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Elpincha


text:
User talk:Cctvvmb

-- 20:17, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Cctvvmb


text:
User talk:Googleexplorer

-- 20:38, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Googleexplorer


text:
User talk:Alex2750

-- 20:42, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Alex2750


text:
User talk:Luckymike967

-- 20:43, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Luckymike967


text:
User talk:Edwindelacruzpdi

-- 20:44, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Edwindelacruzpdi


text:
User talk:Wing23

-- 21:12, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Wing23


text:
User talk:BalkoMilan

-- 21:19, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:BalkoMilan


text:
User talk:Buttonsheep345

-- 21:20, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Buttonsheep345


text:
User talk:Boris Crépeau

-- 21:23, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Boris Crépeau


text:
User talk:VitalyTheUnknown

-- 21:23, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:VitalyTheUnknown


text:
User talk:AlessandroOdo

-- 21:23, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:AlessandroOdo


text:
Thread:Comments:Former Wikileaks employee destroys unpublished leaked documents/Comments from feedback form - "Very well written, very compre..."/reply

Who/what is uowakm?


text:
User talk:Jmarincr

-- 21:38, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jmarincr


text:
User talk:Sudmukh

-- 21:40, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sudmukh


text:
User talk:Billwall2

-- 21:42, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Billwall2


text:
Thread:Comments:Former Wikileaks employee destroys unpublished leaked documents/Comments from feedback form - "Very well written, very compre..."/reply (2)

The contributor from University of Wollongong who started the article. ;)


text:
User talk:Shamresh

-- 21:49, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Shamresh


text:
User talk:Janoxx

-- 21:55, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Janoxx


text:
User talk:Lt300

-- 21:56, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lt300


text:
User talk:Wookieecrisp

-- 22:37, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Wookieecrisp


text:
User talk:Nestorelito112152

-- 22:46, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nestorelito112152


text:
User talk:CTEIIMG

-- 22:49, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:CTEIIMG


text:
User talk:Mikejt

-- 22:49, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mikejt


text:
User talk:STR001

-- 22:52, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:STR001


text:
User talk:AMK152

-- 22:56, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:AMK152


text:
User talk:Sfisek

-- 22:57, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sfisek


text:
User talk:Qont.Fidelito

-- 23:25, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Qont.Fidelito


text:
User talk:Balgariq

-- 23:25, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Balgariq


text:
User talk:Foundereffect

-- 23:41, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Foundereffect


text:
User talk:Ola10

-- 00:05, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ola10


text:
User talk:月夜野ほたる

-- 00:42, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:月夜野ほたる


text:
UK electoral commission asked to investigate News International payoffs

August 25, 2011

The United Kingdom electoral commission has been asked to investigate whether payments made by to  amidst the recent phone hacking scandal were illegal.

Labor MP, who has been a driving force in the phone hacking scandal, called for the investigation after he believed that payments and benefits made to Coulson, including private health benefits and a company car, should have been declared as a political donation. Mr Watson has reportedly been trying to uncover whether Coulson declared these payments to the cultures committee upon applying for access to parliament.

MPs are bewildered by Prime Minister David Cameron's hiring of Coulson without anyone looking into his financial history, and many have expressed outrage as the reports contradict evidence given by the former editor to the culture committee in 2009. He allegedly told the committee that he had received a salary of £275,000 and that he did not have a second income.

Coulson is expected to face further questioning from the committee about the payments after he is cleared from the phone hacking scandal.

, a journalist for the BBC, claimed that Mr Coulson had received several hundred thousand pounds from News International after he began working for the Conservative Party. Despite his ousting in 2007, Mr Coulson received his severance pay in installments from News International until the end of that year.

Coulson was known to have received a payoff after his resignation from News of the World in 2007. The resignation came after the conviction of journalist for phone hacking.

The Culture, Media and Sport Select Committee has stated that both Coulson and should have informed the committee about the payments. The investigation will decide whether or not the electoral committee has been misled by Coulson, and whether the payments should be considered as a political donation.

The committee is expected to meet in early September to decide on a plan of action.


text:
Trapped journalists in Libya freed

August 25, 2011

As many as three dozen correspondent journalists who were trapped inside the Rixos hotel in Tripoli for three days have finally been released unharmed.

Reporters from organisations such as the, , , and were freed around 4pm on Wednesday. The group were being held at the complex by armed men loyal to Gaddafi since Sunday night when the rebels stormed Tripoli and violence erupted in the surrounding streets.

CNN correspondent Matthew Chance said the journalists' captivity ended when the guards were told about the changing situation in Tripoli and realized the regime might be over. A guard told the journalists, “Look, we’re not going to stop you from leaving anymore,” Chance reported. Shortly after being freed Chance posted on twitter, "#Rixos crisis ends. All journalists are out! #rixos."

All the reporters who were held in the Rixos hotel were not even aware that the rebels had taken over Tripoli. Armed men loyal to Gaddafi, including snipers surrounded the hotel complex making it impossible for any of the journalists to go downtown and report on the severe conflict which is making a traumatic shift in the six month civil war. The hotel was one of the only places in the city still controlled by Gaddafi's men.

Reportedly, the power was out on Sunday and Monday night and all the journalists could do was light candles and wait. Gunfire and explosions were heard from the direction of Gaddafi's compound by journalists at the hotel. Trucks with machine guns were outside the Rixos and snipers were seen posted behind trees in the area. The journalists moved to the inside of the hotel to avoid being struck by stray bullets flying through glass windows.

Information on the situation was posted on twitter by the journalists who were being held captive. "Very dark, very quiet at the #Rixos some gunshots cracking outside,” tweeted CNN correspondent Matthew Chance during one of the power surges. Later on he then tweeted, "“#Rixos getting hit by stray bullets."

The dozens of journalists were finally transported in Red Crescent cars to another Tripoli hotel, where they hugged friends and colleagues.

title: Trapped journalists in Libya freed


text:
User talk:Japenagosc

-- 01:02, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Japenagosc


text:
User talk:Terapin18

-- 01:03, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Terapin18


text:
User talk:Jessymar95

-- 01:05, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jessymar95


text:
User talk:SarahUOW

I am a Journalism Student from the University of Wollongong -- 01:08, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Sudanese President releases all detained journalists
This is now published; please review comments on the talk page, and the history of edits post-submission. --Brian McNeil / talk 08:47, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

re
--Gryllida 02:24, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Italian Wikipedia disables their site in response to new laws
I feel I haven't done well by you regarding this article. Sorry. My ability to review has been limited the past few days, but there's also another issue that's been something of a stumbling block for me; I've left a comment on the article talk page. --Pi zero (talk) 00:04, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Wikimedians to the Games
Hi. :) As you're an Australian contributor, I thought you might be interested in Wikimedians to the Games, which is an opportunity to cover the Paralympic Games as a member of the press. As you've experience writing Wikinews articles, this should give you a leg up. :)  LauraHale (talk) 08:41, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:SarahUOW


text:
User talk:Обывало

-- 01:10, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Обывало


text:
User talk:Svendiamond

-- 01:10, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Svendiamond


text:
User:Ajp491

My name is Alex Pike and I am studying a Bachelor of Journalism/Bachelor of Biological Science at the University of Wollongong.

As part of our professional legal and ethics class, we are encouraged to be involved with citizen journalism, using Wikinews as a platform to have our stories published.

Please feel free to review any work I put up as I feel it will improve my news writing skills

title: User:Ajp491


text:
Strauss-Kahn case dismissed

August 24, 2011 Dominique Strauss-Kahn was freed of sexual assault charges yesterday after the New York courts found the accusations against him not credible. After the shocking arrest three months ago when Nafissatou Diallo accused Strauss-Kahn, the managing director of the International Monetary Fund, of assaulting her, the prosecutor deemed the accuser not credible due to previous false rape claims.

The New York Times quoted Strauss-Kahn saying the case has been "a nightmare for me and my family". Taiwan News also quoted Strauss-Kahn who said, "I want to thank all the friends in France and in the United States who have believed in my innocence, and to the thousands of people who sent us their support personally and in writing. I am most deeply grateful to my wife and family who have gone through this ordeal with me."

On May 14, Diallo claimed that Strauss-Kahn forced her to interact in sexual activity in his hotel suite. DNA on Diallo's clothes confirmed an interaction but whether the encounter was forced or not was unsure. In July, she falsely told reporters she was assaulted in her homeland which erased her credibility.

Diallo and her legal team made a last attempt in the criminal case, filing a motion on Monday asking that Mr. Vance’s office be disqualified but early Tuesday morning Justice Obus denied the motion. The encounter between Diallo and Strauss-Kahn was deemed to be consensual leading to Strauss-Kahn's freedom.

Strauss-Kahn is undergoing accusation in another sexual case in France. His lawyers have said this is also a false account.

title: Strauss-Kahn case dismissed


text:
User:Aw570

My name is Alyce Wearne and I am studying a Bachelor of Journalism/ Bachelor of Commerce at the University of Wollongong.

As part of our professional legal and ethics class, we are required to use Wikinews to engage in citizen journalism. My aim for this session is to have a story published on Wikinews.

Any reviews are helpful as they will improve my writing. I hope that my contributions will be valuable and that I will learn from this experience.

title: User:Aw570


text:
User talk:Bélicorne

-- 01:14, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bélicorne


text:
User:SarahUOW

Hi, my name is Sarah Cook and I am a current student studying Journalism at the University of Wollongong.

title: User:SarahUOW


text:
Thread:Comments:Bill to eliminate corruption does not go far enough, say Indian activists and lawyers/Comments from feedback form - "this is very excellent for ine..."

this is very excellent for inernational


text:
Retired policeman arrested in connection with murdered journalist Anna Politkovskaya

August 26, 2011

Retired Russian police officer Dmitry Pavlyuchenkov has been detained in Moscow, accused of involvement in journalist Anna Politkovskaya’s death. A former Police Lieutenant Colonel, he has been accused of planning Politkovskaya’s murder, hiring a hitman and supplying them with the weapon that killed her. Pavlyuchenkov was a witness in the murder trial.

Pavlyuchenkov was also a former chief of the fourth division of the Moscow City Police Operational Search Department. He is suspected of hiring someone to kill Politkovskaya while still serving as a Police Officer.

Politkovskaya was killed after returning to her Moscow apartment building from a grocery store on October 7, 2006. She was an investigative journalist, who was critical of the and Chechen authorities. Her death received international attention. Her work for Novaya Gazeta, an oppositional newspaper in Russia, won her international awards.

In May, Rustam Makhmudov was arrested as suspected gunman, but later acquitted. His two brothers and a retired police officer were put on trial in 2009 for the murder but were acquitted due to lack of evidence. They were accused of playing a minor role in the murder.

This arrest does not name or address who killed Politkovskaya.


text:
User talk:Zuiarra

-- 01:27, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Zuiarra


text:
User talk:Marimarina

-- 02:00, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Marimarina


text:
User talk:Shirayuki Daniel

-- 02:07, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Shirayuki Daniel


text:
User talk:Wic2020

-- 02:22, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Wic2020


text:
User talk:Silverstairs

-- 02:49, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Silverstairs


text:
Thread:Comments:Former Wikileaks employee destroys unpublished leaked documents/Comments from feedback form - "This article has a ways to go ..."

This article has a ways to go grammatically. For instance, what does it mean that he/she has destroyed the leaks TO Julian Assange's site? Do you mean he/she has removed them from the site? Punctuation and capitalization aren't perfect either; it should read, "...between the pair, and has now..."

Furthermore I think this article uses too many quotations for things that could just be reworded.

Also I believe there's more weight put on the perspective of OpenLeaks than that of Wikileaks.


text:
User talk:Victoria and Albert

-- 03:28, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Victoria and Albert


text:
User talk:La goutte de pluie

-- 03:32, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:La goutte de pluie


text:
User:Crm644

Summary of the purpose of my writing - JOUR302 Caitlin Mills - The University of Wollongong

With every new day is the promise of a fresh and interesting news story. As Thomas Griffith is quoted, “Journalism is in fact history on the run”. There is undoubtedly always an untouched or evolving narrative to investigate and record. As a somewhat fickle person, this is ultimately what attracted me to studying the field of Journalism – the guarantee of constant change.

It is for this reason I have also decided to utilize this subject as an opportunity to create an extensive portfolio of articles. With a focus on Australian politics, I plan to submit a 500-piece article to citizen journalism site WikiNews on a weekly to fortnightly basis. I was inspired to focus my attention on Australian politics as I feel there is always something relevant to report on. A recent example would be the controversial and much-publicised Malaysian refugee swap scheme.

I have chosen to submit my writing via digital media as I am also majoring in Digital Communications and feel it would be beneficial to combine skills learnt in both specialisations to create the highest quality of work. I chose ‘WikiNews’ in particular because I know for the work to be approved, it needs to be of high quality. This factor will only encourage and ensure that I achieve my upmost writing standards.

I also feel that WikiNews also prides itself on its high ethical and legal writing practices, and having that consistent reinforcement can only be beneficial in whatever spectrum of journalism I decide to pursue.

As a result of my work in ‘Investigative Journalism’ (Autumn 2011) I have already had direct communication with WikiNews editors, including Brian McNeil. His positive feedback in articles previously submitted (“somebody get this guy an outstanding newcomer award!” (McNeil, 2011)) was ultimately very motivating; I feel continuous correspondence shall be valuable in creating a professional and independent relationship with the editors, a skill which could be utilized in ‘real-life’ practice.

According to SiteTrail.com, WikiNews has an average of 39,333 pages indexed in major search engines like Google, Yahoo and Bing, making stories easy to find. Numerous other news sites, from the Indian Times to Dallas News, source information from WikiNews. This international aspect of WikiNews is also a fabulous way to generate debate over stories and get my reports seen by people all over the world.

title: User:Crm644


text:
User talk:Quentinocama

-- 03:43, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Quentinocama


text:
User talk:Aliali608

-- 03:48, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Aliali608


text:
User talk:UOW4075110

-- 04:03, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Wikimedians to the Games
Hi. :) As you're an Australian contributor, I thought you might be interested in Wikimedians to the Games, which is an opportunity to cover the Paralympic Games as a member of the press. As you've experience writing Wikinews articles, this should give you a leg up. :)  LauraHale (talk) 08:42, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:UOW4075110


text:
User talk:Gman1102

-- 04:25, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gman1102


text:
User talk:নাহিদ

-- 05:23, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:নাহিদ


text:
User talk:Benjamin bain

-- 05:25, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Benjamin bain


text:
User talk:Dhasmanaloda

-- 05:28, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dhasmanaloda


text:
User talk:خالقیان

-- 05:29, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:خالقیان


text:
User talk:Caper the Fox

-- 05:46, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Caper the Fox


text:
Thread:Comments:Sitcom star Roseanne Barr announces run for U.S. president/Roseanne Barr

Roseanne Barr is known for getting numerous men and women to aide Roseanne in this campaign. She gains trust, her people do her work for her, and in the end she yanks the carpet out from under them. She has a reputation for hating men out of impulse and she is unpredictable. Roseanne has taken the work people have done for her for granted since 2006. The People aren't safe with Roseanne Barr as a President or as a Mormon claiming that she would enter the Israel Temple and raise herself to Prime Minister of Israel. She has made numerous threats to various world leaders and is a war monger herself.


text:
User talk:Dennyacw

-- 06:19, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dennyacw


text:
User talk:Huguito eljaker

-- 06:24, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Huguito eljaker


text:
User talk:JamesMadisonIV

-- 06:36, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:JamesMadisonIV


text:
User talk:Zioala

-- 06:40, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Zioala


text:
User talk:Muhandes

-- 06:43, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Muhandes


text:
User talk:Valdaec

-- 06:46, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Valdaec


text:
User talk:Inakki

-- 07:21, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Inakki


text:
User talk:Lucky dog

-- 07:22, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lucky dog


text:
User talk:DeltaShield

-- 07:25, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:DeltaShield


text:
User talk:Svetlov Artem

-- 07:32, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Svetlov Artem


text:
User talk:Dbabaioff

-- 08:03, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dbabaioff


text:
User talk:Absbell

-- 08:08, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Absbell


text:
Talk:UK electoral commission asked to investigate News International payoffs

Review of revision 1277562 [Failed]
If it helps, try using Money to give values in both GBP and USD (I'd also recommend including EUR). It helps our readers if we include more than one currency, and the template does all the formatting and linking for them. That would be. ;) DEN  DODGE  George Watson  23:34, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Headline
A headline should be a sentence; this one is a noun clause. "X calls for Y" is a sentence; "Call for Y" is a noun clause.

Also, I don't know who calls for Y; this basic question appears not to be answered by the lede. --Pi zero (talk) 23:25, 24 August 2011 (UTC)


text: Talk:Strauss-Kahn case dismissed

title: Talk:Strauss-Kahn case dismissed


text: Comments:Strauss-Kahn case dismissed

title: Comments:Strauss-Kahn case dismissed


text:
User talk:GuitarStudio100

-- 09:02, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:GuitarStudio100


text:
User talk:Scksk

-- 09:18, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Scksk


text:
User talk:北京家教

-- 09:27, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:北京家教


text:
User talk:Chiller76

-- 09:28, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Chiller76


text: User:Mathonius

title: User:Mathonius


text:
User talk:Sarina10

-- 09:47, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sarina10


text:
User talk:Prashant Deshpande

-- 09:52, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Prashant Deshpande


text:
User talk:Ste70

-- 10:05, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ste70


text:
User talk:Page Fold

-- 10:15, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Page Fold


text:
User talk:Ameer Heinz

-- 10:17, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ameer Heinz


text:
User talk:Starhh

-- 10:17, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Starhh


text:
User talk:Ffaarrooqq

-- 10:23, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ffaarrooqq


text:
User talk:Bobbyez

-- 10:24, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bobbyez


text:
User talk:Sattila

-- 10:34, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sattila


text:
User talk:Mainote

-- 10:42, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mainote


text:
User talk:Jaishri6387

-- 10:54, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jaishri6387


text:
User talk:Kordit1717

-- 11:17, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kordit1717


text:
User talk:IljaMoser

-- 11:18, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:IljaMoser


text:
Australian TV network sprung fabricating live crosses by rival

August 24, 2011

Australia’s has issued an apology after the rival  caught  fabricating live crosses to the search site for murdered schoolboy. The network issued a statement after Saturday and Sunday’s Nine News bulletins in Brisbane, which featured presenter crossing “live” to the site with the caption: “Near ”.

The rival Seven Network, based nearby, lifted the lid on the scam after filming the Nine News chopper almost 100 kilometres south of Beerwah – on the helipad outside the studio, with lights on and blades in motion while Cameron Price reported from inside. Nine admitted to faking Sunday’s cross; issuing a statement on Monday blaming bad weather.

“Our chopper was forced to divert from Beerwah due to bad weather, and air control instructed them to touch down,” it read.

The network also told media industry website mUmBRELLA that “the producer was unaware until it was too late to abort or delay the cross”.

Doubts have been cast over the truth of this statement, however, as it has since emerged that the chopper was also absent from Beerwah on Saturday, and was in fact circling Brisbane’s western suburbs during Melissa Mallet’s report. Director of Queensland, Rob Raschke, questioned the merit of Nine’s claims, telling Brisbane’s Courier-Mail, “the idea of not knowing where a $3 million helicopter is defies belief”.

A revised statement yesterday announced a Nine investigation into why the location of the helicopter was misreported on both nights, describing the situation as “unacceptable”.


text:
User talk:91.187.103.50

Welcome
Thanks for experimenting with Wikinews. Your test worked, and has now been reverted or removed. Please use Sandbox for any other tests you want to do, since testing in articles may disrupt the site and will be reverted quickly.

the wub "?!"  11:44, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:91.187.103.50


text: Comments:New version of Firefox browser released


text:
Thread:Comments:New version of Firefox browser released/Comments from feedback form - "mozilla"

mozilla —178.20.23.91 (talk) 11:45, 24 August 2011 (UTC)


text:
User talk:Ica-blake

-- 11:45, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ica-blake


text:
User talk:Surfer rossa

-- 12:02, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Surfer rossa


text:
User talk:Naveenks6890

-- 12:02, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Naveenks6890


text:
Thread:Comments:New York executive files $60 million libel lawsuit over insurance scandal/Comments from feedback form - ":d he he"

 * d he he


text:
User talk:Pkioupakis

-- 12:19, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Pkioupakis


text:
User talk:Living rib

-- 12:19, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Living rib


text:
User talk:Josi verdi

-- 12:21, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Josi verdi


text:
User talk:Tingwc

-- 12:43, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tingwc


text:
User talk:Captain Almighty Nutz

-- 12:50, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Captain Almighty Nutz


text:
User talk:Facebook200962

-- 12:58, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Facebook200962


text:
User talk:Unter Sergeant

-- 12:59, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Unter Sergeant


text:
User talk:Sep.suri

-- 13:03, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sep.suri


text:
User talk:Yeungchinglun

-- 13:08, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Yeungchinglun


text:
User talk:Eichenholz

-- 13:09, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Eichenholz


text:
User talk:Naveen.11soni

-- 13:12, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Naveen.11soni


text:
User talk:上者至尊

-- 13:16, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:上者至尊


text:
User talk:Wikivinkeveen

-- 13:21, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Wikivinkeveen


text:
User talk:J4nan

-- 13:24, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:J4nan


text:
User talk:Tung TcT

-- 13:26, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tung TcT


text:
User talk:Sameerp.elec

-- 13:26, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sameerp.elec


text:
User talk:Kamalashree kyasa

-- 13:35, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kamalashree kyasa


text:
User talk:Minakshinajardhane

-- 13:36, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Minakshinajardhane


text:
User talk:Asami21041991

-- 13:43, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Asami21041991


text:
User talk:Srinivasboss

-- 13:45, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Srinivasboss


text:
User talk:Wikiarthurb

-- 13:51, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Wikiarthurb


text:
User talk:Borjaloto

-- 13:57, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Borjaloto


text:
User talk:Sucuinex

-- 14:10, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sucuinex


text:
User talk:Shalinibulusu

-- 14:13, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Shalinibulusu


text:
User talk:YunTechase

-- 14:25, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:YunTechase


text:
User talk:Anilbloodiron

-- 14:27, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Anilbloodiron


text:
User talk:Sethsnyder

-- 14:33, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sethsnyder


text:
Thread:Comments:Special report on Japanese tsunami emergency in Pichilemu, Chile/Comments from feedback form - "wow, garbage"

wow, garbage


text:
User talk:Brettonr

-- 14:45, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Brettonr


text:
User talk:Fountaro

-- 14:49, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Fountaro


text:
User talk:Rsatran

-- 14:56, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rsatran


text:
User talk:Colombia cine

-- 15:07, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Colombia cine


text:
User talk:H-m-c2005

-- 15:09, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:H-m-c2005


text:
User talk:Staf2020

-- 15:11, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Staf2020


text:
User talk:Rakesh965

-- 15:12, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rakesh965


text:
User talk:Khurrampk1

-- 15:16, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Khurrampk1


text:
User talk:Vesdin

-- 15:21, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Vesdin


text:
User talk:Henb

-- 15:32, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Henb


text:
User talk:Меланте

-- 15:32, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Меланте


text:
User talk:Gatocheshire

-- 15:35, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gatocheshire


text:
User talk:Skouyate~enwikinews

-- 15:53, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Skouyate. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Skouyate~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:31, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:37, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Skouyate~enwikinews


text:
User talk:Mcerro

-- 15:55, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mcerro


text:
Talk:Japan nuclear disaster: areas to remain off-limits for decades

Attributing claims to sources
A synthesis article shouldn't be a series of statements of the form "A according to source X, B according to source Y, C according to source Z". If there's no reason to doubt the content as reported by the source article, and the content isn't claimed to be exclusive to the Source article, we have no need to name the source in our article text.

For example, there's no reason to doubt the quote from Yukio Edano, and no reason to think it was an exclusive statement to the Japan Times, so there's no call to add extra words to our paragraph promoting Japan Times. Note, though, that when you pull the mention of Japan Times out of that paragraph, you're left with something too close to the Japan Times source, so our paragraph would then have to be rearranged. --Pi zero (talk) 16:12, 24 August 2011 (UTC)


text:
User talk:Xxxcristianxxx

-- 16:12, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Xxxcristianxxx


text:
Thread:Comments:Strauss-Kahn case dismissed/Moral

So the moral of the story is; if you're gonna rape somebody, make sure they have a history of lying - do your homework first


text:
User talk:Nedkibad

-- 16:48, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nedkibad


text:
User talk:Laís Martins Carvalho

-- 16:51, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Laís Martins Carvalho


text:
User talk:Janne Uusitalo

-- 16:57, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Janne Uusitalo


text:
User talk:Kishorerajgopal

-- 16:59, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kishorerajgopal


text:
User talk:Jimmycardiel

-- 17:00, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jimmycardiel


text:
User talk:Khan27

-- 17:12, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Khan27


text:
User talk:Hotboyy123

-- 17:12, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hotboyy123


text:
User talk:ДюМС

-- 17:17, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:ДюМС


text:
User talk:BaDdIs

-- 17:24, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:BaDdIs


text:
User talk:Rjd0001~enwikinews

-- 17:27, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Rjd0001. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Rjd0001~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:21, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:36, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rjd0001~enwikinews


text:
User talk:Gina johnson

-- 17:52, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gina johnson


text:
User talk:Microman123

-- 18:03, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Microman123


text:
User talk:Jadenko

-- 18:03, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jadenko


text:
User talk:Hallonmannen

-- 18:12, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hallonmannen


text:
User talk:Rupertsciamenna

-- 18:20, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rupertsciamenna


text:
User talk:Alejandro recio villegas

-- 18:39, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Alejandro recio villegas


text:
User talk:Sheix0

-- 18:50, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sheix0


text:
User talk:Santaco

-- 18:53, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Santaco


text:
User talk:Kmc10314

-- 19:00, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kmc10314


text:
User talk:Suryamp

-- 19:16, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Suryamp


text:
User talk:Rokkstarr

-- 19:17, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rokkstarr


text:
User talk:Lindsaydessen

-- 19:31, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lindsaydessen


text:
User talk:Argamedius

-- 19:33, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Argamedius


text:
User talk:Fullsteezy

-- 19:37, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Fullsteezy


text:
User talk:Lucasjacobus

-- 19:39, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lucasjacobus


text:
User talk:Iman nik

-- 19:40, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Iman nik


text:
User talk:Trayne20

-- 19:55, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Trayne20


text:
User talk:AthenasHN

-- 20:01, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:AthenasHN


text:
User talk:Jamestrunda

-- 20:28, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jamestrunda


text:
User talk:Gavin.collins

-- 20:33, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gavin.collins


text:
User talk:Le libertaire

-- 20:40, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Le libertaire


text:
User talk:Miltonrobertojr

-- 20:54, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Miltonrobertojr


text:
Talk:Ignatieff leads in tight race in Canadian Liberal "Super Weekend"

Photo Change
Editprotected

 * The current photo of Ignatieff being used in this article has been deleted. Therefore, I propose that the article be edited to add a new photo or remove the deleted link. Aaaccc (talk) 24 August 2011 (UTC)
 * ❌ as such would be a violation of WN:ARCHIVE. We are aware of the issue and efforts will be made to recover deleted photos, but it is not considered a priority. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 20:25, 28 September 2011 (UTC)


text:
User talk:-antonio-

-- 21:33, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:-antonio-


text:
User talk:JohnSmith70

-- 21:36, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:JohnSmith70


text:
User talk:Timna7

-- 21:53, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Timna7


text:
Thread:Comments:Special report on Japanese tsunami emergency in Pichilemu, Chile/Comments from feedback form - "wow, garbage"/reply

Is that an opinion on the story, or do you have a complaint with the article? If the former, it would be useful if you expanded on your comment to facilitate discussion. If the latter, it would be even more helpful if you expanded on your point so our volunteers can write better articles in future. But this is not the correct venue for such complaints - those belong on the collaboration page.


text:
User talk:Meadow park

-- 22:18, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Meadow park


text:
User talk:Lexicon

-- 22:19, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lexicon


text:
User talk:Macrocoliset

-- 22:20, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Macrocoliset


text:
User talk:Spookiewon

-- 22:25, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Spookiewon


text:
User talk:Acehalo2

-- 22:50, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Acehalo2


text:
User talk:Bigdaddyace

-- 22:54, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bigdaddyace


text:
User talk:Mathew995

-- 22:57, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mathew995


text:
User talk:Freddie711

-- 23:01, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Freddie711


text:
User talk:Sashapips

-- 23:06, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sashapips


text:
Talk:Australian TV network sprung fabricating live crosses by rival

Um...
I'm afraid this headline has me sorely puzzled. What does the headline mean? How is it supposed to be parsed? I'm guessing there's something of Australian English going on here, but I can't even work out what word(s) would be involved in that. Is one of those words supposed to be the verb? --Pi zero (talk) 23:34, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I think "sprung" is an Australian colloquialism for "caught". But IANAA so IDK. DEN  DODGE  George Watson  23:38, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Makes sense.
 * It made me want to read the article. I like it.  --Pi zero (talk) 00:32, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
 * That's pretty much it. --RockerballAustralia c 00:48, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I'll double that "um"........geez, odd fact is that I'd bet (from his user name) that the reviewer is also Australian.......doesn't make him a criminal, but come on man........I'd suppose that loads of english-speakers don't normally use "sprung" to mean "caught". The inconsistencies among reviewers is so disheartening here sometimes.....oh, and by the way: what the heck is a "live cross". Is that a freshly-cut tree upon which you'd crucify someone? It's probably a "live feed"......but there's a load of koala-speak going on here.Bddpaux (talk) 02:00, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Interestingly, in GA English, "sprung" means "released from prison". 76.117.247.55 (talk) 21:08, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Triple-Um...

 * Very badly written, with unprofessional and improper English. I'm betting that "crossing" means "fly-by", but I'm still just guessing. Regardless of who wrote it and whom might read it, it does NOT make sense and needs to be fixed.

 * I'll second that. "discovered by rival to be fabricating live [???]" makes more sense. As it stands we can't tell what "by rival" is supposed to modify, "sprung" or "fabricating". 76.117.247.55 (talk) 21:11, 25 August 2011 (UTC)


text: Comments:Australian TV network sprung fabricating live crosses by rival


text:
User talk:Rafaelandres

-- 23:24, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rafaelandres


text:
User talk:Imoyk

-- 23:52, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Imoyk


text:
User talk:Bmw Mukesh

-- 00:13, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bmw Mukesh


text:
User talk:Davejohnsan

-- 00:15, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Davejohnsan


text:
Apple executive Steve Jobs resigns

August 25, 2011

Steve Jobs, founder of Apple, has chosen to step down from his post as CEO of the company. The former, will be succeeding Jobs as CEO. Jobs resigned in a letter to Apple's board of directors stating, "I have always said if there ever came a day when I could no longer meet my duties and expectations as Apple’s C.E.O., I would be the first to let you know. Unfortunately, that day has come." In that same letter, Jobs stated that his desire was to remain as chairman of the board.

Steve Jobs has been fighting since 2004 and has been on medical leave since January of this year. This was Jobs' third period of medical leave. He briefly made an appearance in March and June to unveil the and the, an online  service. In part of his resignation, Jobs left this farewell, "I have made some of the best friends of my life at Apple, and I thank you all for the many years of being able to work alongside you."

Tim Cook was personally recommended by Jobs to take over as CEO and has been serving as interim CEO since the beginning of Jobs' medical leave. Before his post at Apple, Cook held positions at IBM and. He is known for staying out of the spotlight. Due to an operational overhaul by Cook, he is credited with the success of the iPad and. He also stood in Steve Jobs' place while the CEO underwent liver transplant surgery. He received $59 million for his performance in the position.

Analyst Charles Golvin predicts that the resignation will not begin to affect Apple performance for 1.5 to 2 years. Many of the new products are already under development and Jobs will continue to steer the company from his position as chairman of the board. Art Levinson, chairman of and a member of the board, adds, "Steve will continue to serve Apple with his unique insights, creativity and inspiration". A contrary view is offered by Charles O'Reilly, a management expert at, who stated, "Great companies rarely go from strength to strength". Richard Doherty attributes Steve Jobs' success as the ability to hold off on a product until it is perfect. He states "A lot of products could have gotten to market earlier, but he wanted it better."

In light of the revelation, Apple shares (AAPL) slid $19.37 in after hours trading—a drop of over 5%. Since market open, Apple shares rose to $373.72, a drop of only $2.46 since Wednesday's close.

title: Apple executive Steve Jobs resigns


text:
User talk:Robertogerson

-- 00:39, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Robertogerson


text: Comments:Japan nuclear disaster: areas to remain off-limits for decades


text:
User talk:Copernicus76

-- 00:42, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Copernicus76


text:
User talk:KeViinn

-- 01:01, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:KeViinn


text:
User talk:Potato76828606

-- 01:09, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Potato76828606


text:
Talk:Apple executive Steve Jobs resigns

Merge
Steve Jobs Resigns as CEO of Apple should be merged into this article. They both cover the same topic. Ryan Vesey (talk) 01:09, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I have marked the other article for deletion as copyvio so the merge is no longer appropriate.Ryan Vesey (talk) 02:13, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:Apple executive Steve Jobs resigns


text:
User talk:Eaglesujith

-- 01:32, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Eaglesujith


text:
User talk:Dayizz

-- 01:35, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dayizz


text:
User talk:MadameYLion

-- 01:38, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:MadameYLion


text:
User talk:Ultimate Roadgeek

-- 01:43, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ultimate Roadgeek


text:
User talk:Eze epd

-- 01:51, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Eze epd


text:
User talk:Jorfeson

-- 01:59, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jorfeson


text:
User talk:Wondxp

-- 02:00, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Wondxp


text:
User talk:RM Corporation

-- 02:09, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:RM Corporation


text:
User talk:Nhatkiemthanh

-- 02:18, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nhatkiemthanh


text:
User talk:WSS office

-- 02:20, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:WSS office


text:
User talk:Indoled

-- 03:15, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Indoled


text:
User talk:Jeansonsale

-- 03:17, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jeansonsale


text:
User talk:PEDRO M CRUZ

-- 03:52, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:PEDRO M CRUZ


text: Comments:UK electoral commission asked to investigate News International payoffs


text:
User talk:Nadirhasan

-- 04:11, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nadirhasan


text:
User talk:Pezhvvak

-- 04:19, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Pezhvvak


text:
User talk:Anna Taylor

-- 04:30, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Anna Taylor


text:
User talk:Brandynanderson

-- 04:34, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Brandynanderson


text:
User talk:Accelerometer

-- 04:38, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Accelerometer


text:
User talk:Mint0909

-- 04:58, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mint0909


text:
Thread:Comments:Japan nuclear disaster: areas to remain off-limits for decades/so, if 'm reading this right...

Some of these folks can't go home for 30 YEARS.

Fucking nuclear energy...


text:
User talk:Tpenguin

-- 05:43, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tpenguin


text: Comments:Apple executive Steve Jobs resigns


text:
User talk:Dsoussan

-- 05:54, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dsoussan


text:
User talk:FallingWhale

-- 05:55, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:FallingWhale


text:
User talk:Chibaemon

-- 06:13, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Chibaemon


text:
User talk:Wwe95

-- 06:23, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Wwe95


text:
User talk:Sock90

-- 06:35, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sock90


text:
User talk:Kumaranandsrm2008

-- 06:35, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kumaranandsrm2008


text:
User talk:Kumar.anandsrmec2008

-- 06:55, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kumar.anandsrmec2008


text:
User talk:Oscarlrod

-- 06:58, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Oscarlrod


text:
User talk:Nickispeaki

-- 07:10, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nickispeaki


text:
Thread:Comments:Japan nuclear disaster: areas to remain off-limits for decades/so, if 'm reading this right.../reply

at least they're alive, countless people have died on oil rigs and down mine shafts fucking oil and coal energy


text:
Thread:Comments:Japan nuclear disaster: areas to remain off-limits for decades/so, if 'm reading this right.../reply (2)

hmmm I think there should be a comma there somewhere...


text:
User talk:Berdaguishaw

-- 07:36, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Berdaguishaw


text:
User talk:Onajawa

-- 07:38, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Onajawa


text:
Thread:Comments:Japan nuclear disaster: areas to remain off-limits for decades/main contaminent

Not really sure what the expert means by 'main'radioactive element. I'm not sure this means in initial abundance or main hazard or longest half-life. There's not enough clarity in reports of nuclear accidents, and people are all to happy to become hysterical armed only with wooly facts.


text:
User talk:O56.cvi

-- 07:47, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:O56.cvi


text:
User talk:Abhishekbshah

-- 07:56, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Abhishekbshah


text:
User talk:Ladybronze

-- 07:58, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ladybronze


text:
User talk:Grahamxy

-- 08:03, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Grahamxy


text:
User talk:Ryo tamaki

-- 08:04, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ryo tamaki


text:
User talk:Xhood110call

-- 08:05, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Xhood110call


text:
User talk:ArchieDA

-- 08:08, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:ArchieDA


text:
User talk:Giarto ahmed

-- 08:16, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Giarto ahmed


text:
User talk:Jjfabbsy

-- 08:28, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jjfabbsy


text:
User talk:Comrade alexander

-- 08:32, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Comrade alexander


text:
User talk:Gajendrasingh001

-- 08:34, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gajendrasingh001


text:
User talk:Acerstaub

-- 08:34, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Acerstaub


text:
User talk:Gigio44

-- 08:34, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gigio44


text:
User talk:Khushrebel

-- 08:38, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Khushrebel


text:
User talk:Saravanan029

-- 08:50, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Saravanan029


text:
User talk:Magesh978

-- 08:52, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Magesh978


text:
User talk:Shabakh

-- 09:09, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Shabakh


text:
User talk:DabriaDong

-- 09:23, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:DabriaDong


text:
User talk:Volaj Klara

-- 09:24, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Volaj Klara


text:
User talk:Shnkrgnsh

-- 09:30, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Shnkrgnsh


text:
User talk:Aum103

-- 09:58, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Aum103


text:
User talk:Youhero

-- 10:00, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Youhero


text:
User talk:Freekamia

-- 10:01, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Freekamia


text:
User talk:Acxino

-- 10:16, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Acxino


text:
User talk:Gallina3795

-- 10:24, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gallina3795


text:
Thread:Comments:Social networks asked to visit UK Home Office after riots/In Summary...

...the Home Office will be telling Facebook how it needs to monitor and restrict / censor all of its users because a minority chose to talk on the website about crimes they had committed or were going to commit. Maybe we should ban whispering while we're at it. Anyone over the age of 25 should consider themselves lucky to have known the internet back when it was the last stronghold of freedom.


text:
User talk:Gcsepregi

-- 10:29, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gcsepregi


text:
Thread:Comments:Australian TV network sprung fabricating live crosses by rival/Confusing...

...the article doesn't make it clear what a 'cross' is. Many people won't know. It's hard to figure out what the article is about. Especially at first glance.


text:
User talk:Даганот

-- 10:39, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Даганот


text:
User talk:Kotanatan

-- 10:53, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kotanatan


text:
User talk:Borgmcklorg

-- 11:16, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Strauss-Kahn case dismissed
Hi. A few remarks about how this has gone; Wikinews can take some acclimating to. --Pi zero (talk) 14:54, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Substantive changes are only allowed to an article for the first 24 hours after publication. After that, only a few kinds of changes are permitted.
 * I'm displeased that the existing lede uses the word shocking, which is POV; but that got by us.
 * The lede of a Wikinews article is not like the first paragraph of a Wikipedia article. The lede should succinctly answer as many as reasonably possible of the basic questions about the news event that is the focus of the article; that annoying word shocking is the only problem I see with the current lede.

title: User talk:Borgmcklorg


text:
User talk:Anonimo190497

-- 11:38, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Anonimo190497


text:
User talk:Ontoraul

-- 11:49, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ontoraul


text:
User talk:Heaulmes

-- 12:16, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Heaulmes


text:
User talk:Haytaylan

-- 12:17, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Haytaylan


text:
User talk:Patraporn

-- 12:31, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Patraporn


text:
User talk:Mehranspruch

-- 12:35, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mehranspruch


text:
User talk:Kamotonokasen

-- 12:43, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kamotonokasen


text:
User talk:Smy987

-- 12:48, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Smy987


text:
User talk:Satanchuli

-- 12:52, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Satanchuli


text:
User talk:Kamalswiki

-- 12:53, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kamalswiki


text:
User talk:Nitish5rao

-- 12:58, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nitish5rao


text:
User talk:FELQUIHE

-- 13:03, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:FELQUIHE


text:
User talk:Randomdragonpakistan

-- 13:33, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Randomdragonpakistan


text:
User talk:Ah.harsha

-- 13:46, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ah.harsha


text:
User talk:Jbrichardson3

-- 13:46, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jbrichardson3


text:
User talk:Thebit.hao

-- 13:56, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Thebit.hao


text:
User talk:MigPao

-- 13:57, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:MigPao


text:
User talk:Francisco Quiumento

-- 14:10, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Francisco Quiumento


text:
User talk:Gurleen~enwikinews

-- 14:16, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Gurleen. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Gurleen~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:15, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:31, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gurleen~enwikinews


text:
User talk:Misseuh 974

-- 14:18, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Misseuh 974


text:
User talk:Miss Tea-House Moon

-- 14:21, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Miss Tea-House Moon