text:
User talk:71.254.110.148

Welcome
Welcome!

Welcome to Wikinews! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

Our key policies - if you read anything, read these! Here a few pointers to help you get to know Wikinews: There are always things to do on Wikinews:
 * Neutral point of view - tell every side to a story in a fair and balanced way
 * Cite sources - everything in a Wikinews article must be sourced
 * Introduction - overview of the site
 * Writing an article - how to write and publish a complete article
 * Content guide - what's suitable for Wikinews
 * Style guide - how articles should look before publishing
 * Contents - the contents page.
 * Existing articles need expanding and checking for spelling and mistakes
 * The front page lead articles often need updating
 * Developing stories need finishing and publishing
 * Discussions need your input
 * And of course, stories need writing!

Here are some other hints and tips:

 * I would recommend that you get a username. You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikinews, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information (not even an e-mail address), and there are many benefits of having a username.  (If you edit without a username, your IP address is used to identify you instead.)

 * When using talk pages (the "collaboration" tab at the top of the page), or the comments pages (tab "opinions"), please sign your name at the end of your messages by typing four tildes (~~). This will automatically produce your username (or IP address) and the date.

If you have any questions, you can ask them at the water cooler or to anyone on the Welcommittee, or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!Cirt (talk) 06:36, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

RE: Simple English Wikinews
I don't know anything about the creation of Wikis. But you can try Brian McNeil. He might know how to help, or at least send you in the right direction. :) DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 15:40, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

title: User talk:71.254.110.148


text:
User talk:PCMcGarry452

  Tris   10:40, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: User talk:PCMcGarry452


text:
Lewis Hamilton wins 2009 Hungarian Grand Prix

July 26, 2009

McLaren Mercedes driver Lewis Hamilton won the FIA Formula One 2009 ING Magyar Nagydij at the Hungaroring, just outside of Budapest, Hungary.

His KERS-equipped car was quick enough to overtake all the rivals in front of him, except only Fernando Alonso (Renault), who took the pole position yesterday. But Alonso's first pit-stop brought trouble with an untightly done wheel nut and he left the front right tyre spinning off the track, luckily no one was hurt as compared to Massa yesterday, and Surtees last Sunday.

Massa's teammate for Ferrari, Kimi Räikkönen, also managed to get through from seventh on the grid, to second place with the help of KERS. On the podium, his second place trophy was presented by prominent opera singer Placido Domingo.

Mark Webber set up a third place for Red Bull, while his team-mate Sebastian Vettel was out of the race due to problems with the car's suspension.

Nico Rosberg drove his Williams up to fourth place, while the second McLaren of Heikki Kovalainen came fifth.

Championship leader Jenson Button gained two points for Brawn by finishing 7th and is now 18.5 points ahead of Webber, who has moved into second place ahead of Vettel. He split the two Toyota cars of Timo Glock and Jarno Trulli, who completed the top eight.


text:
User talk:Emythmakers

Also, your contribution Bangladesh Astronomical Association is not news. You may want to try Wikipedia instead. Cheers, --SVTCobra 14:43, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

title: User talk:Emythmakers


text:
Portal talk:Health

How many contributors are working on the Health category of WikiNews? At the time I'm writing this, it seems like the most recent article is about six weeks old.

Portal:Dermatology ?
While I have contributed a lot to wikipedia, I am basically a noobie here on Wikinews. I am posting because I have the following question... I am designing a dermatology portal on Wikipedia, and would like to have the most recent dermatology-related wikinews displayed in that portal. Therefore, I wanted to know if it that would be possible to do (i.e. like a spin-off of your Portal:Health)? ---Kilbad (talk) 15:09, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * This discussion is continuing on the newsroom. --Brian McNeil / talk 15:30, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

title: Portal talk:Health


text: User:Max Payne 2k8

title: User:Max Payne 2k8


text:
Contador wins 2009 Tour de France; Cavendish wins six stages

July 26, 2009 Spaniard Alberto Contador of team Astana has won the 2009 Tour de France after crossing the line in a final time of 85:48:35 for the 21-stage grand tour. Andy Schleck from Luxembourg came in second place. Schleck, riding for Team Saxo Bank also won the maillot blanc for the young riders' classification.

American Lance Armstrong of Astana claimed the final podium spot, 5:24 behind Contador. The seven-time Tour-winner returned from retirement after winning the 2005 Tour de France. Winning the final stage at Champs-Élysées in Paris, France, was Mark Cavendish in a time of 4:02:18. The British cyclist won six stages this year, topping his achievement of four stage wins last year.

The points classification was won by Thor Hushovd of Norway with 280. The Cervélo TestTeam rider finished ahead of Team Columbia-HTC's Cavendish, despite the latter's multiple stage wins.

The King of the Mountains winner is Italian Franco Pellizotti, riding for Liquigas, who also got the additional honor of being the most aggressive rider. Team Astana, with two men on the podium, won the team classification.


text:
Wikinews:Dynamic quiz/quiz/2009/31

Welcome to the Wikinews World News Quiz, giving you a chance to test your knowledge on this week's news.

Last Updated: July 26, 2009

title: Wikinews:Dynamic quiz/quiz/2009/31


text: Talk:Iranian plane crashes on runway, 17 dead


text: Talk:Contador wins 2009 Tour de France; Cavendish wins six stages


text: User:Cirt/Featured articles

title: User:Cirt/Featured articles


text:
User talk:Sswonk

Welcome
--Brian McNeil / talk 20:27, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sswonk


text:
User talk:Willj9330

  Tris   22:31, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

title: User talk:Willj9330


text:
Comments:Vestas occupation continues; left-wing political parties voice support

On the lately quite beleaguered concept of rights
These occupying workers are quite transparently disregarding the property rights of the owners and investors of Vestas, and of Vestas itself. However, like so many people that disrespect the rule of law these days, they of course attempt to commandeer the concept of rights for their own defense. Now I am, by virtue of my Libertarian allegiances, very sensitive to rights, and very attentive to claims that they are being violated, however I've observed a disturbing trend that's actually eroding the entire concept of rights: people are simply taking any vague, generic, egalitarian-sounding notion and creating it a "right" whenever it is convenient. I am at a loss to trace the principled origin of the "right" to be fed and coddled by people whose own well-established rights you are trampling. If the workers wanted food, they could desist from their illegal conduct and thereby easily attain it. They seem to believe that they should be protected from the consequences of their own actions (such as voluntarily occupying a plant that doesn't have sufficient provender to provide them), which idea should send a dubious signal whenever it is encountered (all too frequently in the current economic climate).

The response of the authorities is also disturbing. If the comments in this article are to be taken as a representative aliquot of the official commentary, count me disturbed that nobody is actually advancing the enforcement of the law and the vindication of the only cognizable rights that are in fact being violated: those of the property owners. Instead, as far as I can see, the politicians are all too busy debating whether or not Vestas is a nice corporation and its actions sufficiently sensitive and PC. Rights, by definition, do not depend on whether one is within the current political zeitgeist, and to make them so dependent is to nullify their meaning, because people with such favor are unlikely to need rights to protect them in the first place. Instead of treating Vestas's rights with due solemnity, legislators instead condemn their exercise of their freedom of association (to choose which persons they want to maintain in the status of employees or engage other financial relationships and negotiations with) as "totally unacceptable," and brush aside their property rights as though rights were a matter of give and take. "Oh, well, since you are so unreasonable, and cannot be brought to compromise on this right, you can hardly expect us to enforce this other right of yours."

Bottom line: it seems at least that those who trumpet rights the loudest are the self-same people who want to inflict on them the gravest injury and selective neglect. I hope this skepticism of mine will yield, as it should, when real violations of real rights occur. 209.30.177.37 (talk) 23:28, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Politicians are anguishing over this and not urging forceful eviction of the workers because they're not in the employ of corporations. Their job is to serve the people who elect them and work in the best interests of the country. You seem to be saying that Libertarianism equates to more voting power the more capital you have. I think you'll find that's corporate fascism.
 * I won't dispute they're breaking the law with the occupation, but otherwise the proposed closure would be a ten second snippet on the late night news. A protest highlights the situation and people get time to think about what it means. To me as a Brit it means the company will move - penalty free - to where a totalitarian regime (China) provides near-slave labour prices and thus make higher profits. That seems unethical to start with. In the longer term it means that when the British taxpayer actually wants these wind turbines for eco power then all the money paid for them will be going abroad - no local workers ploughing their income back into the economy, no local taxes on the company's profits, and the fairly environmentally un-friendly issue of shipping built turbines halfway round the world. --Brian McNeil / talk 09:17, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * If the workers were just occupying some guy's house, while he was still living in it, and for no reason, would you say taking his side over theirs was fascism of some kind? Is it the plight of the workers which makes it, to your mind, fascism not to support their occupation of somebody else's land? 31 voters may all have equal voting power, but that doesn't ordinarily mean that the first 30 are allowed to use their combined power to sit heavily on the last one, in a literal sense. (Unless they voted for a government which made a new law allowing this.) 81.131.69.88 (talk) 10:40, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Why do the owners of the plant own the plant anymore than the workers? After all if anything the workers work harder to sustain itSoapy (talk) 03:18, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Besides, it's likely that there are more directors and managers of Vestas than there are workers occupying the plant, and then what happens to your argument about politicians responding to voters and people having equal voting power? I suppose you might say that there is a great mass of public support for the workers, and that politicians should respond to the power of all those voters. Then it just becomes a massive free-for-all as voters of various ideological alignments attempt to use their votes to trample on one another's rights; which is horribly close to the truth, but isn't the way things ought to be. 81.131.69.88 (talk) 11:08, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I agree (unsurprisingly, since I'm a libertarian). One point, though, is that the punishment of a trespasser ought to be proportional to the harm caused by the trespassing, and if they aren't doing any measurable material harm, they are free to continue - or if the harm is very small, it's not worth the trouble of punishing. I don't really grasp what the situation is at the Vestas plant. Presumably the 30 workers are causing serious harm - at least, the need for a double ring fence doesn't sound very convenient for business, and there is the falling share price. So why can't they - for a start - be bodily picked up and slung out by security? Is it a matter of getting some kind of court order for them to leave, before this can be done without fear of the security guards being prosecuted for assault? Are the workers too aggressive to be manhandled, even by the riot police? 81.131.69.88 (talk) 10:26, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Ah, but democracy has been described as "three wolves and a sheep voting on what's for dinner". 'Corporate fascism' is a more populist term used to refer to situations where the power of government is used to support corporate goals - generally the push to profit regardless of the impact on an area's economy or inhabitants.
 * Well, I'm no advocate of unrestrained democracy. In fact, this whole topic I started would be pointless if the controlling principle were always majority, because that would make all rights nugatory. I don't see what democracy has to do with the topic at hand actually. Let's say the government is an oligarchy instead. Would that change the fact that it's wrong to ignore the law and the basic rights people have to their property? As to the second part, if I understand your definition correctly, saying I stole some goods from the local Wal-Mart and the police interfered in my abstraction of those goods, that would be an instance of corporate fascism, since the government is being used to support the goals of a corporation - Wal-Mart - to possess and to traffic in household merchandise. In fact, the existence of corporations is corporate fascism, since the government furthers their goals of establishing a charter and a legal structure to conduct enterprise. 209.30.177.37 (talk) 14:19, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I have no idea where you come up with the 'theft from Wal-Mart' comparison. Your argument is to pull up laws that are not in dispute, say they should be religiously enforced, then say this is no different. In effect, the workers are wage slaves and have no stake in what they helped create. --Brian McNeil / talk 15:44, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm just trying to understand the scope of these terms you're introducing. It seems quite important to explore their extent if you in effect propose to condition the authority of law on the presence or absence of these labels. Here you've introduced "wage slavery" which is another along the same lines. You've repudiated the natural extension of your terminology because that would introduce matters that, according to you, are not in dispute. However, if these terms have no meaning that can be generalized to other situations, then they're just convenient proxies for "the X's should not have equal protection of the law because I don't like them." 209.30.177.37 (talk) 23:06, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

 * Were security staff working for Vestas to physically eject the plant occupiers there is a risk they could be charged with assault, and from the company's perspective it would be a PR disaster to have evening news coverage of people being manhandled off the premises. They'll leave it to the police, and the police will only act once the appropriate legal motions have been gone through. That might be a judge or magistrate ruling their occupation illegal, it might just be serving a notice to get out and waiting for a deadline to expire, or the company may have to go through the process of firing the employees so they can prosecute for trespass.
 * Well, I must say I don't like the contours of that situation. As a hypothetical, assume that there is anarchy. Then the workers could occupy the facility, but the corporation would have a natural recourse, namely force. The only difference in the present situation is the removal of this recourse. The government assumes the role of exercising that recourse - force - on our behalf through the mechanism of law. If the law's protections are ignored with respect to someone, then that entity is subject to the vagaries of anarchy, while the rest are protected from his retaliation by the law. This is a two-faced system that establishes anarchy for some and protection for others. It's worse than the state of nature, because it lacks even the benefit of being even-handed. 209.30.177.37 (talk) 14:19, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The logical extension of your argument is to globally adopt American principles - "Trespassers will be shot, survivors that do not crawl off the property will be shot again". This is not a place of residence, the board and directors don't live in the plant. --Brian McNeil / talk 15:44, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * No, that's not a logical extension of my argument. Rather, it's an intellectually dishonest one that has no basis in what I said and does not follow as a consequence. Also, this "American principle" is in fact not the way trespass is treated in America, but only your own interpretation that seems to be based in xenophobia. There's really no way I can argue against what you're saying without merely restating my previous argument because the defect is that you're mis-characterizing what I said. It's a straw man. 209.30.177.37 (talk) 23:06, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

 * I very much doubt the workers occupying the plant are destructive, threatening, or violent - a double fence does not indicate that to me. They want the plant to reopen and continue working, it would not be in their interests to cause damage.
 * Forcing someone to perform an economic action which is not in his interest, such as operating an uneconomical facility, is a ridiculous ultimatum. It's akin to slavery. Or perhaps the government should take the property and operate it itself, which is theft? Presumably, if the government were willing to buy at a market rate (not theft) this situation would not have arisen. Purchase at some sub-market rate is merely theft of the difference from market value. The demands of the workers seem rather extortionate to me. Extortion is usually classified as a violent crime. In this case the extortion is accomplished by forcible occupation and holding hostage of another's facilities.209.30.177.37 (talk) 14:19, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Define "uneconomical"? There is a market in the UK and Europe for the plant's products. What's causing outrage is the general opinion that this is "Plant in UK makes x% profit" but someone in the company says, "rip it up, move it to China, and we can make x%+ profit". That's cold, calculating, callous, and cruel to workers who you might presume have given labour and loyalty to the company. Does the company have no moral or social obligation to the community that has supported them?--Brian McNeil / talk 15:44, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't see how "uneconomical" is a nebulous term. It means not in the economic interest of the relevant party. If it were in fact economical to continue operating the plant, there would be no reason to move it elsewhere. Continued operation is, however, uneconomical in light of the opportunity cost incurred by not building a factory that can operate with better margins. Are you trying to say that as long as someone is turning a profit, it's economical to continue the current practice even if there are obvious alternatives that would produce a better return? 209.30.177.37 (talk) 23:06, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

 * As to physical numbers as a method of deciding the dispute - it just doesn't work. Less occupying workers than shareholders? More supporters of the workers than shareholders? It is tyranny of the majority one way or the other. Whose best interests are served by any specific decision or action?
 * Truly a question for the ages: one we could debate until we turn blue. Instead let's just leave people free to decide what's in their own best interest so they can individually bear that cognitive load and meanwhile use our collective resources to ensure that they leave each other free to seek those interests, which may include building wind turbines somewhere other than the instant place. 209.30.177.37 (talk) 14:19, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * "I was just following orders." Bernie Madoff is about the only corporate fat-cat I can think of who has taken responsibility for acting in his own interests when they weren't in others. The rest? Like the bankers, and the car company executives? "It wasn't me! Everyone else did it! I met my targets for the quarter!" --Brian McNeil / talk 15:44, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Freedom to pursue one's interest clearly does not include freedom to frankly defraud people a la Madoff. He's, however, a red herring, because he is in fact in the process of being legally proceeded against for his behavior. I don't, however, see any argument advanced that Vestas has been defrauding its investors or cooking its books. 209.30.177.37 (talk) 23:06, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

 * If you start digging down into who has a right to actually have a say on this it gets more murky. If Vestas is publicly traded you'd expect a lot of the company stock to be held by retirement/pension funds. Should the fund managers out to maximise return tell Vestas to go ahead with the closure, or should the fund members have a say on a lower profit to keep the firm operating in the UK?
 * That would depend on a lot of irrelevant corporate governance minutiae, but we can assume that the executives of a company act in the interest of the shareholders, since otherwise those shareholders would bail or oust the management. Of course, principal-agent problems do happen, and this system can become degenerate when operated in bad faith, but again I don't see the relevance or any indication that this situation obtains. 209.30.177.37 (talk) 14:19, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Nobody is forced to face up to the consequences of their actions. I feel this is what the Vestas workers are doing. By bringing publicity to the planned closure the company is being shamed in the press for seeking the biggest return in the shortest time for the least investment. That 'race to the bottom' again. --Brian McNeil / talk 15:44, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The workers are certainly free to rouse all the publicity they want or can get, but that doesn't mean they are entitled to invade and occupy somebody else's property to do so. People should experience the consequences of their actions, but those consequences should not include spiteful and illegal actions by people who are unhappy with a decision. 209.30.177.37 (talk) 23:06, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

 * I was born, grew up in, and after some years in mainland Europe, am now back in Scotland. I would describe my political outlook as Socialist, and view the fact that less than 5% of the population own at least 90% of the wealth as appalling. I hate seeing essential services and infrastructure being run and developed on a for-profit basis, particularly utilities like water, electricity, gas, transport and communications. Even the uber-capitalist United States recognises that something like a universal postal service should put public interest before profit.
 * Given that outlook, I would never accept comparing the situation here to someone occupying your home while you're still trying to live in it. This is a corporation, and I think corporate personhood is one of those aberrations in law that is unfair to the wider population. All too often it leads to companies being corporate psychopaths. Best for them, and damn the social consequences. If you want corporate personhood there should be a 'corporate death penalty'. This is not a case for it, but it highlights a need and desire for a discussion on what is appropriate here. This is just another example of globalisation manifesting itself as a 'race to the bottom'. This is counter to the hundreds of years of fighting for worker's rights. Were laws not challenged and changed, or had been rigidly enforced, do you think anyone outside that richest few percent of the population would now be living to over 50? Or, do you think there would have been a bloody revolution as in Russia?
 * So, who decides what is right? Should it be what is right for the workers? What is right for society? Or what is right for Vestas? Callously applying the law is forgetting that civilisation is three meals away from anarchy. --Brian McNeil / talk 12:22, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Laws that are ignored whenever our sympathy is quickened are not laws at all, but rules of preference, favor and emotional response. These provide no firm guidance for what we can and cannot do, therefore subjecting people to the whims and fancies of arbitrary governance and to post hoc judgments that are in fact unjust because they cannot be predicted. It is not callous to enforce principles that we can all agree to abide by, principles that can act as a bedrock upon which we build our endeavors. A society that vacillates to and fro, tacking in the doldrums of relativism, will never be fair to anyone and will not encourage productive behavior. 209.30.177.37 (talk) 14:19, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * And blind obedience to the letter of the law is to walk into slavery. A handful of workers can't "buy" a law, but companies have been doing it for decades. The very notion of a company is a privilege granted by the government acting on behalf of the public. Your notion of the rights of the company trumping the entire local community is the same logic that allows landowners in third-world countries to dig a hole in the ground and charge to fill it up with toxic waste. --Brian McNeil / talk 15:44, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Laws that can be ignored whenever we attach a pejorative label to the beneficiary of the law are not in fact laws. Your argument would make all laws illegitimate since corporations can simply buy them out, with the result that we're back to anarchy. 209.30.177.37 (talk) 23:06, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Perhaps I do not put things as articulately as those who have expressed views I agree with. Was Gandhi unreasonable in urging Indians to spurn British made cloth? Was he wrong to make salt from the sea when the law ruled it illegal without payment of a tax? Law isn't cast in stone like some tablets the crazy guy brought down off the mountain. If it cannot be questioned or challenged then we cut babies in half in our little totalitarian regime. --Brian McNeil / talk 23:29, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

 * hey Brian McNeil stop making fun of the bible and using blasphemy.--208.114.130.122 (talk) 17:47, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

 * When you ask if he was wrong to make salt, you're confusing two different issues. My previous comments were about the government enforcing its own laws. If we change the question to be about the government, we're asking "Should the government ignore the law it has against making salt from the sea if Gandhi violates it?" which is less clear-cut. Whether laws are just is another issue entirely apart from the first, and the prior topic. Clearly, disobedience of unjust laws is at least sometimes justified. How can we tell an unjust law? It doesn't protect any valid right, but instead infringes on those rights. Would you argue that the law against trespasses to other people's property doesn't protect a valid right? Would you argue that about the salt making law? I'd say no to the former, yes to the latter. In that case, the latter law should be deleted. It shouldn't be selectively ignored or kept on the books to be applied only for people we like or against those we don't. In your offensive stone tablet analogy, you seem again to be conflating ignoring the law and changing the law. We can change the law, and should change it where it is unjust by being too restrictive or by not protecting people from incursions upon their own rights. It's a separate matter to say the government should ignore the authority of its own laws. 209.30.177.37 (talk) 23:47, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Ignoring the arguments about social responsibility and property rights (easy for most of us, as we don't actually own property or a company), the ultimate goal of this occupation seems to be a call for nationalization of the factory. Surely, for the observer with a modicum of economics knowledge, this is where the argument breaks down. First, the government would be required by their own laws to pay a fair price for the property, which might require them to match or exceed a competitive private bid. This serves the ultimate profit line of Vestas just fine, so there is no "revenge" to be had by this action. Even assuming a full government seizure with no compensation for Vestas, they are no doubt already prepared for the construction and launch of a factory in China, which means they will still be producing wind turbines at reasonable prices. The British factory, meanwhile, is now going to be run according to the specifications of the government, without the benefit of the former management structure (the majority of management will move on to better jobs, guaranteed). The odds of their being able to compete with the private corporations involved in the UK markets are heavily stacked against them, and the workers in this nationalized factory will very likely face layoffs, overtime, and a general decrease in quality of life. Since this is a government project now, the workers' compensation will have to be provided by the government - therefore, from taxpayers. If taxpayers do not see a hefty return on their investment, is it fair to assume they will still be completely concerned with the welfare of these workers? The bottom line is, you can't have it both ways. It is unconsciable to force a corporation to conform to the will of "socially aware" interests. Nobody is owed a living in this world, and the workers that are currently receiving free food in exchange for flaunting a violation of the law have a responsibility to themselves to dust themselves off and seek work elsewhere. If the plant is that important to them, perhaps they would be well-served to open their own plant and see what it's like to be an owner.

Vestas occupation
Baisicly this is what its like. Say you where renting a house out to somebody. After a while you decided to sell the house so you gave the tenant warning the they would have to move out in a couple weeks Instead of moving out they decide to "occupy" the house and you can't do anything about it. If you go in and forcefully kick them out they can press charges. Sometimes this human rights stuff goes way to far.--208.114.130.122 (talk) 15:36, 28 July 2009 (UTC)


text:
User:Vrythramax

This is the User Page for Vrythramax

title: User:Vrythramax


text:
Talk:Lewis Hamilton wins 2009 Hungarian Grand Prix

Clean up sources, in-line link.--SVTCobra 10:12, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

✅--SVTCobra 12:49, 28 July 2009 (UTC)


text:
User talk:Eelyekal

Gopher65talk 02:46, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

title: User talk:Eelyekal


text:
User talk:Ben2109~enwikinews

Gopher65talk 02:46, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Ben2109. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Ben2109~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:14, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:29, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ben2109~enwikinews


text:
Comments:Iranian plane crashes on runway, 17 dead

Are Russian planes more dangerous, or is the airlines operating them?
It's not necessarily true that Russian planes are more accident prone. See this article:

http://www.businessweek.com/globalbiz/blog/europeinsight/

--cm

Soviet/Russian aircraft are NOT more accident prone.
In addition to the Businessweek article cited in the previous comment, an official ICAO study determined that Russian-made aircraft have similar, and often superior (Tu-154, IL-86), safety records to their Western counterparts.

The type involved in this accident (Ilyushin Il-62) has a statistical accident rate of 0.75 per 100,000 hours of flight - this includes both fatal and non-fatal accidents. The ICAO's conclusion for this aircraft is as follows, The IL-62, IL-62M long-range narrow-body aircraft safety level in comparison with similar Western products DC-8. B-707, for a total period of operation is the same as a DC-8 and a little better than a B-707.

The full report is available online at: http://www.icao.int/icao/en/dgca/ip/dgca_06_ip_48_e.pdf

Thefore, and in the interest of both objectivity and accuracy. The last sentence of this article must be redacted as soon as possible.

References

--SputniK 79 (talk) 00:43, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

 * The article clearly states that it is as a result of using older models (the DC-8 and B-707 you compare to are long out of production), combined with the problems that Iran is having in obtaining parts. Thus, it ought not be redacted. --SVTCobra 02:43, 29 July 2009 (UTC)


text:
22 killed as heavy rain hits Panzhihua, China

July 28,2009 Heavy rains and flooding hit Miyi County in Panzhihua, in the southwestern part of Sichuan Province, in China on Sunday killing 22 people. Thirty-eight others were injured and at least 7 others are still missing. The strong storm dropped 177 mm of rain between 21:50 on July 26 and 8:00 a.m. on the next day. Over 100,000 people were affected. About 17,500 residents had to be evacuated from Jiangxi province where rain fell for four days.

At present, emergency rescue and disaster relief work is being carried out. Rescue workers are providing blankets while financial aid is being devoted to the area. In total preliminary estimates set damages at ¥225 million yuan (US$33 million) as houses, roads, bridges, and farmland were destroyed.

Last spring the province was hit by a 7.9 earthquake which left 68,636 dead and nearly 375,000 injured.


text: Comments:Swine Flu hits schools in India


text:
User:Tristessa de St Ange/WNNB Jul2708

{date|July 27, 2009}}

About
The Audio Wikinews - News Brief is a two to five minute audio newscast summary of each day's top stories on Wikinews.

Also available as a RSS feed to subscribe to. News brief RSS

title: User:Tristessa de St Ange/WNNB Jul2708


text:
User talk:Ashishnoelmassey

Welcome
--Brian McNeil / talk 17:28, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Copyright violation
Unfortunately the article you have posted is cut and pasted from another website. As such it is a copyright violation and cannot be retained on Wikinews. --Brian McNeil / talk 17:53, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Please read
Please read some of the links provided in the above welcome template. They should explain better how your work on Wikinews needs to be presented to meet the site's publication standards. --Brian McNeil / talk 19:37, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikinews! Thanks for creating Attack on Media's Freedom. Unfortunately, it had to be deleted due to the fact that it met one of the criteria for speedy deletion. All articles on Wikinews have to be about news events, and I do not believe that your article reports on a news event.

I really hope that you choose to continue contributing to Wikinews, although I strongly suggest you read Wikinews' content guide and our guide to writing an article first.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page, or ask other contributers to Wikinews on our assistance page.

Thanks, Shakata Ga Nai ^_^ 07:45, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

EarthQuake hits Part of South America
Thanks for creating this story. I've redirected it to 8.8 magnitude earthquake hits Chile because that article covers the same subject and is more developed. Regards. Adambro (talk) 11:00, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ashishnoelmassey


text:
Heavy rainfall creates huge traffic jams across Delhi, India

July 27, 2009

On Monday, a weather event that dropped the heaviest rain of the season so far, brought Delhi, India to a standstill. Heavy rain fell for several hours resulting in water logging and heavy traffic jams, but also providing relief from recent dry and hot weather.

There was 29.4 millimeters (1.2 in) of rain between 17:30 and 20:30, and overall 69 millimeters (2.7 in) of rain fell from Sunday evening until 20:30, according to city meteorologists.

Many major roads and routes within Delhi such as Mathura Road, South Extension, Nehru Place, India Gate, and Connaught Place had traffic jams which forced commuters to wait in traffic for several hours.

Earlier, the Municipal Corporation of Delhi had stated that it had completed 98% of the de-silting of some 1,500 drains under the city, a project begin in September 2008. MCD commissioner K S Mehra had stated that the city would not experience any further waterlogging such as this.

There were reports of water entering the arrival area of Indira Gandhi International Airport, and visibility at the airport fell to 700 meters (2,297 ft), leading to closure of one runway.


text: Talk:Heavy rainfall creates huge traffic jams across Delhi, India


text:
Talk:Rugby Union: Ballymore Cup North Queensland carnival

OR Notes
NQ Carnival

Rockhampton Grammar 22 d Townsville Grammar 0 Townsville Grammar 15 d St Augustine's College 12 Rockhampton Grammar 29 d St Augustine's College 5

Final: Rockhampton Grammar 14 d Townsville Grammar 5 --RockerballAustralia (talk) 23:47, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Email from QRU
The following is an email from the Queensland Rugby Union Unfortunately Whitsundays Anglican School was not able to field a suitable team for the weekend. The Ballymore Cup is an U17 competition which restricted 18 year olds from participating in the competition from WAS at the carnival weekend.

WAS had also been a late invitation to attend after Proserpine SHS decided not to compete. WAS and Proserpine SHS had drawn the Mackay final but Proserpine SHS progressed initially as they were the minor premiers of the competition. --RockerballAustralia (talk) 02:32, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Spelling
This "Townsviille" doesn't look right, but with no sources to check against, I can't be sure. --SVTCobra 10:28, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * "Townsville" perhaps? In Queensland, Australia according to Open Street Map --James Pain (talk) 10:32, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * What a stupid answer that was. Both spellings "Townsville Grammar School" and "Townsviille Grammar School" are used twice and there is nothing to check it with so...yeah.......what Cobra said. --James Pain (talk) 10:36, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * It should be "Townsville"--RockerballAustralia (talk) 10:43, 28 July 2009 (UTC)


text:
North Carolina terrorist ring broken up, seven arrested

July 28, 2009

On Monday, July 27, the Federal Bureau of Investigation arrested seven men in North Carolina in the United States for alleged terrorist activity. All seven were indicted in the Eastern District of North Carolina, as noted in a press release from the FBI, and in the text of the indictment, "for conspiring to provide support to terrorists and conspiring to murder, kidnap, maim and injure persons abroad."

The leader of the alleged terrorist ring is 39 year-old Daniel Patrick Boyd of Johnston County, North Carolina, who went under the alias Saifullah. Boyd is alleged to have trained in Afghanistan between 1989–1992 and fought in the Soviet war in Afghanistan. Also arrested and indicted were Dylan Boyd, Zakariya Boyd, both sons of Daniel, as well as Mohammad Omar Aly Hassan, Hysen Sherifi, Anes Subasic, and Ziyad Yaghi. Six of the seven men were U.S. citizens. Hysen Sherifi, a native of Kosovo, was a legal permanent resident of the U.S.

According to David Kris, an assistant attorney general in the United States Department of Justice, Daniel Boyd "is a veteran of terrorist training camps in Pakistan and Afghanistan who, over the past three years, has conspired with others in this country to recruit and help young men travel overseas in order to kill". The group supposedly also ran a training facility in Caswell County, North Carolina and was in the process of raising funds to support terrorist operations in Tel Aviv, Israel. Justice Department statements claim several members of the group had participated in, or had planned to participate in, "violent jihad" and "soliciting funds and personnel to support the mujihaden". Among the material support that Daniel Boyd and his group allegedly provided were several illegally obtained handguns and rifles, including two weapons in 2006, one in 2007, four in 2008, and six in 2009.


text:
Talk:North Carolina terrorist ring broken up, seven arrested

This seems to be copied nearly verbatim from the sources: "for conspiring to provide support to terrorists and conspiring to murder, kidnap, maim and injure persons abroad." – Juliancolton  | Talk 02:57, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I ammended it to indicate which sources it came from. That should clear it up.  Thanks for catching that!  --Jayron32. talk . contribs  03:10, 28 July 2009 (UTC)


text:
User:HappyInGeneral~enwikinews

see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:HappyInGeneral

title: User:HappyInGeneral~enwikinews


text:
User talk:Cs-wolves

  Tris   08:44, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

title: User talk:Cs-wolves


text:
User talk:SkyBon

Welcome
--Brian McNeil / talk 11:23, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Gennadiy Onishchenko.png
This image does not appear to be free. If fair use is asserted, it must be accompanied by a fair-use rationale. However, since this is of a living person, that seems unlikely. --SVTCobra 11:42, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The rationale you've added claims that the image is not replaceable. This does not seem justified. --SVTCobra 12:01, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, at least I could google only news agencies' or other fair use photos of him... SkyBonTalk/Contributions 12:14, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

title: User talk:SkyBon


text:
User:SkyBon

Just a Wikipedia editor

title: User:SkyBon


text:
User:SkyBon/Signature

SkyBonTalk/Contributions

title: User:SkyBon/Signature


text:
User talk:Dahlbarbie79

First off, we really appreciate your contribution.

But sometimes users submit an article from somewhere else, not realizing that Wikinews cannot keep copy-and-paste versions of articles which are published elsewhere under a restrictive copyright. An article created in this way is a copyright violation, and Wikinews policy is to erase these even if they are excellent article ideas.

Another problem which sometimes comes up is press releases: Press releases are sometimes excellent sources, but they do not qualify as unbiased news articles so they can't be published as they are. Two key things to remember about press releases is that they're usually written to represent the viewpoint of an involved party (Thus likely running foul of our Neutral Point of View policy). And second, they are generally covered by copyright which can conflict with our open editing approach.

A better way to get an article on an exciting subject published here is to write an original article following the guidelines described in writing an article, or to write a brief explanation of the subject and include the url address of articles or websites to use as sources. If you are part of the story that the article is about, you may also wish to consider requesting an interview rather than writing the article yourself.

Thanks again!--SVTCobra 12:10, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dahlbarbie79


text: Talk:22 killed as heavy rain hits Panzhihua, China


text: Comments:Heavy rainfall creates huge traffic jams across Delhi, India


text:
Vestas protesters sacked with immediate effect

July 30, 2009

Eleven of the 25 workers at the Vestas factory in Newport, Isle of Wight, England who have been carrying out a sit-in since Monday July 20 have been sacked with immediate effect.

According to one of the protesters known as "Mike", the occupiers were given their dismissal notices concealed under slices of their evening meal of pizza. The company said that the protesters have had ample opportunity to air their point of view, and had no choice but to sack eleven of the twenty five workers that they had positively identified; and that given that the fact that the action constituted a "fundamental breach" of trust, that the eleven would not be entitled to redundancy packages. A press release from the company said that Vestas "saw no other choice than to dismiss the 11 employees, who the company has positively identified as the employees currently participating in the occupation of the factory."

The protesters remained upbeat, vowing to continue their occupation and have called upon the UK government to save the 625 jobs and to nationalise the Danish owned factory. Occupier Ian Terry told the BBC that if the occupiers are forced out, they plan to leave the building "peacefully".

Vestas management were dealt a setback today in ending the occupation as Newport County Court ruled that the papers accusing the occupiers of aggravate trespass and requiring they surrender the office they occupy by July 29 were improperly served. The case has been adjourned until Tuesday August 4. In court, Judge Graham White said he was "distinctly uncomfortable" with what he perceived as Vestas' effort to "get around the rules" in retaking the factory from the occupiers.

Legal representation for the Vestas workers had been offered by Bob Crow, secretary of the RMT trade union. Crow has pledged the "full solidarity" of the RMT and seven other unions with the workers occupying the plant.

Vestas management has also been providing the occupiers with hot meals in an apparent response to Crow's announcement, made on July 24, that the RMT was planning on airlifting food into the factory by helicopter. Crow is meeting today with Ed Miliband, the Environment Minister.

Earlier in the week, Miliband pledged £6 million in funding to an expansion of Vestas' Isle of Wight research and development centre, which currently employs 110 workers and could, said the Minister, be expanded to employ 40 more. Rallies continued throughout the week in support of the Vestas occupiers. Since the occupation began, the Vestas workers have received declarations of support and solidarity from a wide swathe of the British left, including but not limited to: political parties Green Party, Respect, the Socialist Party, the Socialist Workers Party, the Alliance for Workers Liberty, and the Communist Party of Britain; the TUCG group, which brings together the BFAWU, FBU, NAPO, NUJ, PCS, POA, RMT, and URTU; and environmental groups Greenpeace, the Campaign against Climate Change, Climate Camp, and Workers' Climate Action, who claims credit for initiating the campaign to occupy the factory. Attendees of the Big Green Gathering, a large annual environmentalist rally which was due to take place starting today but was suddenly canceled on Sunday, are being encouraged to go to the Isle of Wight and take part in support rallies for Vestas instead.

Speaking to Wikinews about the "red-green" coalition supporting the occupation, a spokesman for the Alliance for Workers' Liberty said: "We think this struggle is important on at least three grounds — it is central to the struggle for jobs, it is central to the struggle for the environment, and it is central to the struggle for rebuilding the labour movement."

Photographs shared with Wikinews by the occupiers show the occupiers, mostly young men, talking, carrying out everyday tasks, and keeping in touch with the outside world via mobile phones. The use of mobile telephones in the Vestas occupation has given the press remarkable access to the occupiers and provided an effective platform for relaying their demands and feelings to the media. In contrast, Vestas's designated media contact for the United Kingdom is on vacation. Attempts to reach Vestas Newport factory manager Patrick Weir, whom a Vestas representative at the company's Danish headquarters stated was handling press inquiries regarding the occupation, received no reply.

Vestas plans to close the factory on July 31, citing the difficulties of obtaining planning permission for wind farms in the United Kingdom. All blades manufactured at Vestas' Newport plant are sent to the United States. 1900 employees of the company in Northern Europe face job losses, 625 of them in Vestas's plants in the south of England.


text:
Colombia's relations with Venezuela deteriorate over Swedish rockets

July 29, 2009

 * Newsroom
 * Style Guide - how to write
 * Content Guide - what to write

The President of Venezuela, Hugo Chávez, announced on Tuesday that "We will freeze relations with Colombia." He attributed the decision to "new aggression by the government of Colombia." Further, he said, "I've ordered to withdraw our ambassador from Bogota, to withdraw our diplomatic personnel."

This diplomatic move follows claims by Colombia that amongst weapons its military has captured from the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) are AT4 anti-tank rockets manufactured by Saab Bofors Dynamics of Sweden. Colombia further alleges that the weapons were first sold to Venezuela before being given to the FARC. "This is not the first time that this happens," Colombian Vice-President Francisco Santos said. "In several operations in which we have recovered weapons from the FARC, we have found powerful munitions and powerful equipment, including anti-tank weapons, from a European country that sold them to Venezuela and that turned up in the hands of the FARC."

"It is correct that they have found these weapons to be Swedish-made," said Jens Eriksson, adviser at the Swedish foreign ministry. "We are working together with Colombian authorities to investigate the matter further and we have contacted Venezuelan authorities to clear up how these arms ended up in Colombia."

Venezuela denies the allegations. "To me it seems that this is a new attack against our government based on lies," Venezuelan interior minister Tarek El Aissami said on Monday. "We absolutely deny that our government or our institutions are providing assistance to criminal and terrorist organizations. It's laughable, it sounds like a cheap film made by the American government."

Foreign minister Nicolás Maduro said that the whole thing is a campaign "to justify the presence of US bases" in Colombia.


text:
Comments:22 killed as heavy rain hits Panzhihua, China

How does rain kill? Flash flooding? 71.120.114.83 (talk) 01:38, 29 July 2009 (UTC)


text:
Ukrainian journalist Gongadze's skull may have been found

July 29, 2009

Investigators in Ukraine believe that they have found the skull of journalist who was kidnapped and found decapitated in 2000. Skull fragments were found near.

The discovery comes after, who was apprehended last week, told officials his involvement with the case was "direct." At the time, officials said that Pukach offered to show them the location of Gongadze's head.

Prosecutors filed charges against Pukach on Friday. They believe that Gongadze was killed because of his articles, which incriminated then-President in corruption.


text:
Talk:Ukrainian journalist Gongadze's skull may have been found

Notes for the reviewer
The statement that Pukach offered to locate the skull comes from our own Ukranian former official admits to murdering journalist article (as listed in related), which if you really need to track down, comes form here. Cheers, --SVTCobra 02:21, 29 July 2009 (UTC)


text:
Seven million dollar Iraq bank heist leaves eight dead

July 29, 2009

Eight security guards were tied up, gagged, and killed when armed robbers held up the Rafidain bank in Karradah district of Baghdad, Baghdad bureau de change, and made off with 8.5ع.د billion (US$7 million). The robbery occured about 4 a.m. Tuesday morning. Five of the guards were off duty and may have been on break or asleep, and only three were actively on duty at the time of the break in.

Initial investigations in the capital city of Iraq reveal that pillows may have been used to muffle the gunshot noise rather than silencers.

"I have never seen such a brutal crime. Now robberies have become like foreign movies - they steal and kill and disappear," said a bank employee.

It is not certain at this time if the robbers were funding terrorist causes from the proceeds of the bank robbery. "While I cannot confirm that the attacks were terrorist related, it does fit past trends of terrorist groups in Iraq of financing their operations through crimes — like kidnappings for ransom, robberies and black marketeering," reported U.S. Army spokesman Maj. David Shoupe.


text:
Portal talk:Rhode Island/Wikipedia

Why is Rhode Island used to update w:Portal:Bulgaria/In the news/Wikinews Bulgaria? --SVTCobra 04:05, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Heh, that's what I get for copy and pasting :) – Juliancolton  | Talk 04:07, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

title: Portal talk:Rhode Island/Wikipedia


text:
Haitian migrants drown and many more still missing

July 29, 2009 A Haitian shipwreck occurring Sunday night or Monday afternoon took the lives of at least 15 poverty stricken migrants seeking America when waves tore the handmade wooden sailboat to shreds on the coral reefs off the Turks and Caicos Islands. Of the 200 on the overloaded vessel, about 70 are still missing and 122 have been rescued. "The boat ran aground on a reef, Molasses Reef, off West Caicos. We have a total of 15 dead bodies now. They are illegal immigrants," said Calvin Chase, Turks and Caicos police Sergeant.

Haitian survivors reported that after they had been sailing about three days they had spotted police boats in the area and turned towards the dangerous reefs.

The U.S. Coast Guard were alerted Monday to the situation and offered aircraft and ships to supplement Turks and Caicos search and rescue personnel.

The injured are being treated in Caribbean hospitals. The rescue operation was hampered by 23 mph winds and sea waves cresting up to high.

The survivors will be repatriated back to Haiti.

Last week over 100 Haitian migrants were rescued from an overloaded ship near the same area and repatriated to Haiti, and in May a capsized boat killed as many as nine illegal immigrants.

"Unfortunately many people lose their lives trying to reach the United States illegally, anywhere of 100 or more per year. They don't have enough life-saving gear or signaling gear to ensure that they are able to survive if they do have any problems at sea," said Lt Cdr Matthew Moorlag of the US Coast Guard.

Haitian families will spend their savings to pay brokers up to $500 for a spot on these overcrowded boats. The illegal immigrants often traveling with little food and water hope for employment in the United States, the Bahamas or in the Turks and Caicos Islands.

In May of 2007 a similar tragedy occurred when an overcrowded people smuggling ship capsized carrying 160 aboard. Survivors reported fellow passengers being eaten by sharks.


text:
Comments:22 killed as heavy rain hits Miyi Country

JUST TELL ME WHEN THE 3 GORGES DAM GOES!!!


text: Talk:Haitian migrants drown and many more still missing


text: Talk:Seven million dollar Iraq bank heist leaves eight dead


text: Talk:Colombia's relations with Venezuela deteriorate over Swedish rockets


text:
Comments:Colombia's relations with Venezuela deteriorate over Swedish rockets

I love how the commies still find a way to blame America.--66.229.10.50 (talk) 12:10, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Quick! Look under the bed, there might be a commie! So, tell me... What's the Right-wing xenophobic US equivalent of the UK's Daily Mail then? --Brian McNeil / talk 12:46, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * @facepalm I was talking about Chavez Brain not the news that report it. *roll eyes at liberals and there double standards on people with different views.--66.229.10.50 (talk) 14:36, 29 July 2009 (UTC)


text:
Comments:North Carolina terrorist ring broken up, seven arrested

Daniel Boyd "is a veteran of terrorist training camps in Pakistan and Afghanistan who, over the past three years, has conspired with others in this country to recruit and help young men travel overseas in order to kill"

So he's a military recruiter? :)
 * Being related to an Army recruiter, I should find that offensive, but I actually find it really funny! XD

I understand Islam well enough. That people come in it for the wrong reason. However, studying Islam enough you come out with the right reason.Learn the purpose about yourself.


text:
Talk:Vestas protesters sacked with immediate effect

Original research
(performed Friday July 24) Landline: (performed July 29)
 * Phoned Ulla Andren, Vestas Northern Europe listed media contact, on publicly-listed phone numbers
 * Identified self as Edmund Schluessel, freelance reporter writing for Wikinews
 * Asked for statement about Vestas. Left message.
 * Landline: Recorded message says switchboard closed, call 004597305000
 * Mobile: Ms Andren is on vacation to 3 August
 * Paddy Weir 01983824719
 * Phoned Mr Weir, left message
 * Phoned Alliance for Workers Liberty.
 * Spokesman gave the statement: "the Alliance for Workers Liberty gives our full support to the Vestas workers." ""We think this struggle is important on at least three grounds -- it is central to the struggle for jobs, it is central to the struggle for the environment, and it is central to the struggle for rebuilding the labour movement".

Review
--Brian McNeil / talk 09:19, 30 July 2009 (UTC)


text:
Comments:Lewis Hamilton wins 2009 Hungarian Grand Prix

ATLEAST D SHOEMAKERS R NT WINNIN RACES DEY R BACK 2 THEIR COBLER BUSINESS N SUM RACERS WINNIN D RACE
 * Your etch-a-sketch is defective. Please disconnect it from the Internet, turn upside-down, and shake.
 * Oh, and with Massa out there are rumours Shoemaker may take the seat. --Brian McNeil / talk 16:04, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh, he isn't winning any more races, is he? No, he's long gone. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 19:19, 30 July 2009 (UTC)


text:
Michael Schumacher returns to Formula One to replace injured Massa

July 30, 2009

Seven-time world Formula One racing champion Michael Schumacher announced his plans to replace Felipe Massa in the second Ferrari car in the FIA Formula One 2009 European Grand Prix in Valencia, Spain.

Massa was recently injured after a spring got loose from Rubens Barricello's car and hit his head in the Hungarian GP. Schumacher is expected to replace Massa for at least one Formula One event until the recovery of the Brazilian driver. Schumacher will get ready for his return using a special training program, checking his recovery after he fell off a motorcycle.

The last time the "Red Baron" drove the Ferrari car was more than a year ago, in April 2008. If Schumacher starts in Valencia, it would be his first GP with Kimi Räikkönen as his team mate.

Massa and Schumacher were team mates during the latter's last season and the two are said to be close friends. Massa was in a medically induced coma for several days but took his first steps today and can speak coherently; it was also confirmed today that he can still see out of both eyes. Concern does still remain about potential damage to his left eye. Massa was due to leave intensive care Wednesday and may be walking fully within ten days, although doctors remain cautious in their outlook for the Brazilian, who was runner-up in last year's season.

There were different speculations about Massa's replacement: most notable and curious was that the double world championship winner Fernando Alonso was to negotiate with Ferrari after the Renault team was penalized to skip the GP on Alonso's home soil. Alonso was out of the recent Hungarian GP just after the first pit-stop cause of a loose wheel nut of the right front wheel. This incident not only stripped Renault of the possible podium finish, but also caused that penalty. To note, it was also the Hungarian GP of 2006 when Alonso was in the lead for most of the race, but ended it right after his pit-stop because off a badly attached right front wheel. That race was unexpectedly won by Jenson Button, who is now the championship leader.

In other news related to Formula One BMW Sauber announced plans to retire from the sport at the end of this season. FOTA says it will try to help the team to stay in Formula One, which could possibly mean moves similar to those when Honda was withdrawn from Formula One at the end of the previous season.


text: User:Grondin/Bac à Sable

title: User:Grondin/Bac à Sable


text:
User:Ric36

 * My page on Wikipedia
 * Sports news

title: User:Ric36


text:
Jaipur's Queen Gayatri Devi dies at 90

July 30, 2009

Maharani Gayatri Devi, formerly the Rajmata of Jaipur and one of the last of India's surviving royalty, died Wednesday, July 29, after a ten-day illness. She was 90 years old.

Born in 1919 into the royal family of Cooch Behar, in 1939 Devi married Maharaja Sawai Man Singh II of Jaipur, becoming his third wife.

After India gained independence in 1947, the popular Devi ran for parliament in 1962 as a member of the Swatantra Party, winning her constituency with a then-record 78% of the vote. Devi won reelection twice, but she ran afoul of tax laws after the abolition of privy purses in 1971 and was jailed for five months.

After her release from prison, she withdrew from politics and published an autobiography, A Princess Remembers, in 1976; the 1997 film Mémoires d'une princesse des Indes (Memoirs of a Hindu Princess) was based around her life.

A funeral planned in Jaipur for today has drawn thousands of attendees. Gayatri Devi is survived by two grandchildren.

title: Jaipur's Queen Gayatri Devi dies at 90


text:
User:Totie/vector.css

display: none; }
 * 1) siteNotice {

title: User:Totie/vector.css


text: User talk:Saqib Chaudhary

title: User talk:Saqib Chaudhary


text:
Talk:Michael Schumacher returns to Formula One to replace injured Massa

Review
--Brian McNeil / talk 11:02, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Quote boxes
What happened to the practice that quotes in boxes were highlights of quotes in the body of the article? --SVTCobra 11:46, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I didn't spot that in the review, I did recognise all the quotes as being from articles. --Brian McNeil / talk 12:01, 30 July 2009 (UTC)


text:
User:Politis

Welcome to my page. It will evolve as I get the hang of it

title: User:Politis


text:
User talk:Politis

Feel free to ask me any questions.   Tris   16:01, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

title: User talk:Politis


text:
User:Frayr

Hello I'm new to wikis in general. Thought I might as well hang around wikinews as well...seems an interesting project.

title: User:Frayr


text:
User talk:Frayr

--SVTCobra 17:35, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

title: User talk:Frayr


text:
Airbus offers funding to search for black boxes from Air France disaster

July 30, 2009 Airbus have announced that they will be willing to contribute between €12 million and €20 million (about US$16 million to $28 million) to fund an extended search for the black boxes from Air France Flight 447. The jetliner crashed into the Atlantic Ocean in June, killing all 228 people on board.

Chief executive Thomas Enders said in a statement, "We want to know what happened, as improving air safety is our top priority. We are fully committed to support the extension of the search with a significant contribution." Although airframers normally supply technical assistance to investigations, the required impartiality makes funding rare, with Airbus spokesman Stefan Schaffrath saying the company's move was unprecedented.

"This is an exceptional accident and an exceptional situation," Schaffrath explained. France's investigative agency BEA has requested financial assistance for the search from both Airbus and Air France. Air France have discussed this possibility with the BEA.

Investigators have already given up looking for the and  using the conventional method of tracing audio 'pingers', the batteries of which would have expired after 30–40 days. Efforts are ongoing using sensitive equipment under tow from a French naval vessel, but if this search proves fruitless then the BEA will seek money for a further three-month search.

The jet's (ACARS) was able to transmit information regarding problems on board prior to the crash. The ACARS data suggests that the plane had suffered from a loss of valuable readings including airspeed, leading suspicion to fall on the which supplies various measurements.

Airbus had already recommended that one component of this system, the, be replaced on A330s. Air France had not done this on the accident airplane although the entire fleet now features the modified design. Three other incidents have been identified since that may involve similar circumstances. The United States National Transportation Safety Board is probing two over American soil while earlier this month another Air France A330 equipped with the new tubes suffered a similar series of problems enroute from Italy to France.


text:
User talk:66.158.138.186

Welcome
Thanks for experimenting with Wikinews. Your test worked and has now been reverted or removed. Please use Sandbox for any other tests you want to do, since testing in articles may disrupt the site's working and will be reverted quickly. Cheers, --Jcart1534 (talk) 20:31, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

title: User talk:66.158.138.186


text: Talk:Jaipur's Queen Gayatri Devi dies at 90


text: Talk:Airbus offers funding to search for black boxes from Air France disaster


text:
User talk:Cabohound

Spam
Thanks for your interest in Wikinews. However, we don't accept advertising or spam. Please see the links above for our policies and tips on contributing. Cheers, --Jcart1534 (talk) 21:48, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

title: User talk:Cabohound


text:
Category:August 1, 2009

ar:تصنيف:1 أغسطس 2009 es:Categoría:1 de agosto de 2009 fr:Catégorie:1er août 2009 it:Categoria:1 agosto 2009 hu:Kategória:2009. augusztus 1. ja:Category:2009年8月1日 pl:Kategoria:1 sierpnia 2009 pt:Categoria:1 de agosto de 2009 ru:Категория:1 августа 2009 sr:Категорија:1. август 2009. fi:Luokka:1. elokuuta 2009 ta:பகுப்பு:ஆகஸ்ட் 1, 2009 zh:Category:2009年8月1日

title: Category:August 1, 2009


text:
Category:August 2009

ca:Categoria:Agost del 2009 cs:Kategorie:Srpen 2009 de:Kategorie:August 2009 es:Categoría:Agosto de 2009 fr:Catégorie:Août 2009 ko:분류:2009년 8월 it:Categoria:Agosto 2009 ja:カテゴリ:2009年8月 no:Kategori:August 2009 pl:Kategoria:Sierpień 2009 pt:Categoria:Agosto de 2009 ro:Categorie:August 2009 ru:Категория:Август 2009 sr:Категорија:Август 2009. fi:Luokka:Elokuu 2009 sv:Kategori:Augusti 2009 ta:பகுப்பு:ஆகஸ்ட் 2009 tr:Kategori:2009/08 uk:Категорія:Серпень 2009 zh:Category:2009年8月

title: Category:August 2009


text:
Wikinews:2009/August/1

 category=Published category=August 1, 2009 notcategory=Disputed notcategory=No publish suppresserrors=true stablepages=only showcurid=true

fr:Wikinews:2009/août/01 it:Wikinotizie:2009/agosto/1 hu:Wikihírek:2009. augusztus 1. nl:Wikinews:2009/augustus/1 ja:ウィキニュース:2009年/8月/1日 pt:Wikinotícias:2009/agosto/1 sr:Викивести:1. август 2009. fi:Wikiuutiset:1. elokuuta 2009 zh:Wikinews:2009年/8月/1日

title: Wikinews:2009/August/1


text:
Portal:Australia/2009/August/1

 category=August 1, 2009 category=Published category=Australia notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:Australia/2009/August/1


text:
Portal:New Zealand/2009/August/1

 category=August 1, 2009 category=Published category=New Zealand notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:New Zealand/2009/August/1


text:
Category:August 2, 2009

ar:تصنيف:2 أغسطس 2009 de:Kategorie:02.08.2009 es:Categoría:2 de agosto de 2009 fr:Catégorie:2 août 2009 it:Categoria:2 agosto 2009 hu:Kategória:2009. augusztus 2. ja:Category:2009年8月2日 pl:Kategoria:2 sierpnia 2009 pt:Categoria:2 de agosto de 2009 ru:Категория:2 августа 2009 sr:Категорија:2. август 2009. fi:Luokka:2. elokuuta 2009 ta:பகுப்பு:ஆகஸ்ட் 2, 2009 tr:Kategori:2009/08/02 zh:Category:2009年8月2日

title: Category:August 2, 2009


text:
Wikinews:2009/August/2

 category=Published category=August 2, 2009 notcategory=Disputed notcategory=No publish suppresserrors=true stablepages=only showcurid=true

fr:Wikinews:2009/août/02 it:Wikinotizie:2009/agosto/2 hu:Wikihírek:2009. augusztus 2. nl:Wikinews:2009/augustus/2 ja:ウィキニュース:2009年/8月/2日 pt:Wikinotícias:2009/agosto/2 sr:Викивести:2. август 2009. fi:Wikiuutiset:2. elokuuta 2009 zh:Wikinews:2009年/8月/2日

title: Wikinews:2009/August/2


text:
Portal:Australia/2009/August/2

 category=August 2, 2009 category=Published category=Australia notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:Australia/2009/August/2


text:
Portal:New Zealand/2009/August/2

 category=August 2, 2009 category=Published category=New Zealand notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:New Zealand/2009/August/2


text:
Category:August 3, 2009

ar:تصنيف:3 أغسطس 2009 cs:Kategorie:3. srpen 2009 de:Kategorie:03.08.2009 es:Categoría:3 de agosto de 2009 fr:Catégorie:3 août 2009 it:Categoria:3 agosto 2009 ja:カテゴリ:2009年8月3日 pl:Kategoria:3 sierpnia 2009 pt:Categoria:3 de agosto de 2009 sr:Категорија:3. август 2009. fi:Luokka:3. elokuuta 2009 ta:பகுப்பு:ஆகஸ்ட் 3, 2009 zh:Category:2009年8月3日

title: Category:August 3, 2009


text:
Wikinews:2009/August/3

 category=Published category=August 3, 2009 notcategory=Disputed notcategory=No publish suppresserrors=true stablepages=only showcurid=true

fr:Wikinews:2009/août/03 it:Wikinotizie:2009/agosto/3 hu:Wikihírek:2009. augusztus 3. nl:Wikinews:2009/augustus/3 ja:ウィキニュース:2009年/8月/3日 pt:Wikinotícias:2009/agosto/3 sr:Викивести:3. август 2009. fi:Wikiuutiset:3. elokuuta 2009 zh:Wikinews:2009年/8月/3日

title: Wikinews:2009/August/3


text:
Portal:Australia/2009/August/3

 category=August 3, 2009 category=Published category=Australia notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:Australia/2009/August/3


text:
Portal:New Zealand/2009/August/3

 category=August 3, 2009 category=Published category=New Zealand notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:New Zealand/2009/August/3


text:
Category:August 4, 2009

ar:تصنيف:4 أغسطس 2009 de:Kategorie:04.08.2009 es:Categoría:4 de agosto de 2009 fr:Catégorie:4 août 2009 it:Categoria:4 agosto 2009 hu:Kategória:2009. augusztus 4. ja:Category:2009年8月4日 pl:Kategoria:4 sierpnia 2009 pt:Categoria:4 de agosto de 2009 ru:Категория:4 августа 2009 sr:Категорија:4. август 2009. fi:Luokka:4. elokuuta 2009 ta:பகுப்பு:ஆகஸ்ட் 4, 2009 zh:Category:2009年8月4日

title: Category:August 4, 2009


text:
Wikinews:2009/August/4

 category=Published category=August 4, 2009 notcategory=Disputed notcategory=No publish suppresserrors=true stablepages=only showcurid=true

fr:Wikinews:2009/août/04 it:Wikinotizie:2009/agosto/4 hu:Wikihírek:2009. augusztus 4. nl:Wikinews:2009/augustus/4 ja:ウィキニュース:2009年/8月/4日 pt:Wikinotícias:2009/agosto/4 sr:Викивести:4. август 2009. fi:Wikiuutiset:4. elokuuta 2009 zh:Wikinews:2009年/8月/4日

title: Wikinews:2009/August/4


text:
Portal:Australia/2009/August/4

 category=August 4, 2009 category=Published category=Australia notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:Australia/2009/August/4


text:
Portal:New Zealand/2009/August/4

 category=August 4, 2009 category=Published category=New Zealand notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:New Zealand/2009/August/4


text:
Category:August 5, 2009

ar:تصنيف:5 أغسطس 2009 cs:Kategorie:5. srpen 2009 de:Kategorie:05.08.2009 es:Categoría:5 de agosto de 2009 fr:Catégorie:5 août 2009 it:Categoria:5 agosto 2009 ja:カテゴリ:2009年8月5日 pl:Kategoria:5 sierpnia 2009 pt:Categoria:5 de agosto de 2009 ru:Категория:5 августа 2009 sr:Категорија:5. август 2009. fi:Luokka:5. elokuuta 2009 ta:பகுப்பு:ஆகஸ்ட் 5, 2009 zh:Category:2009年8月5日

title: Category:August 5, 2009


text:
Wikinews:2009/August/5

 category=Published category=August 5, 2009 notcategory=Disputed notcategory=No publish suppresserrors=true stablepages=only showcurid=true

fr:Wikinews:2009/août/05 it:Wikinotizie:2009/agosto/5 hu:Wikihírek:2009. augusztus 5. nl:Wikinews:2009/augustus/5 ja:ウィキニュース:2009年/8月/5日 pt:Wikinotícias:2009/agosto/5 sr:Викивести:5. август 2009. fi:Wikiuutiset:5. elokuuta 2009 zh:Wikinews:2009年/8月/5日

title: Wikinews:2009/August/5


text:
Portal:Australia/2009/August/5

 category=August 5, 2009 category=Published category=Australia notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:Australia/2009/August/5


text:
Portal:New Zealand/2009/August/5

 category=August 5, 2009 category=Published category=New Zealand notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:New Zealand/2009/August/5


text:
Category:August 6, 2009

de:Kategorie:06.08.2009 es:Categoría:6 de agosto de 2009 fr:Catégorie:6 août 2009 it:Categoria:6 agosto 2009 hu:Kategória:2009. augusztus 6. ja:Category:2009年8月6日 pl:Kategoria:6 sierpnia 2009 pt:Categoria:6 de agosto de 2009 ru:Категория:6 августа 2009 sr:Категорија:6. август 2009. fi:Luokka:6. elokuuta 2009 ta:பகுப்பு:ஆகஸ்ட் 6, 2009 zh:Category:2009年8月6日

title: Category:August 6, 2009


text:
Wikinews:2009/August/6

 category=Published category=August 6, 2009 notcategory=Disputed notcategory=No publish suppresserrors=true stablepages=only showcurid=true

fr:Wikinews:2009/août/06 it:Wikinotizie:2009/agosto/6 hu:Wikihírek:2009. augusztus 6. nl:Wikinews:2009/augustus/6 ja:ウィキニュース:2009年/8月/6日 pt:Wikinotícias:2009/agosto/6 sr:Викивести:6. август 2009. fi:Wikiuutiset:6. elokuuta 2009 zh:Wikinews:2009年/8月/6日

title: Wikinews:2009/August/6


text:
Portal:Australia/2009/August/6

 category=August 6, 2009 category=Published category=Australia notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:Australia/2009/August/6


text:
Portal:New Zealand/2009/August/6

 category=August 6, 2009 category=Published category=New Zealand notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:New Zealand/2009/August/6


text:
Category:August 7, 2009

cs:Kategorie:7. srpen 2009 es:Categoría:7 de agosto de 2009 fr:Catégorie:7 août 2009 it:Categoria:7 agosto 2009 ja:カテゴリ:2009年8月7日 no:Kategori:7. august 2009 pl:Kategoria:7 sierpnia 2009 pt:Categoria:7 de agosto de 2009 ro:Categorie:7 august 2009 ru:Категория:7 августа 2009 sr:Категорија:7. август 2009. fi:Luokka:7. elokuuta 2009 ta:பகுப்பு:ஆகஸ்ட் 7, 2009 zh:Category:2009年8月7日

title: Category:August 7, 2009


text:
Wikinews:2009/August/7

 category=Published category=August 7, 2009 notcategory=Disputed notcategory=No publish suppresserrors=true stablepages=only showcurid=true

fr:Wikinews:2009/août/07 it:Wikinotizie:2009/agosto/7 hu:Wikihírek:2009. augusztus 7. nl:Wikinews:2009/augustus/7 ja:ウィキニュース:2009年/8月/7日 pt:Wikinotícias:2009/agosto/7 sr:Викивести:7. август 2009. fi:Wikiuutiset:7. elokuuta 2009 zh:Wikinews:2009年/8月/7日

title: Wikinews:2009/August/7


text:
Portal:Australia/2009/August/7

 category=August 7, 2009 category=Published category=Australia notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:Australia/2009/August/7


text:
Portal:New Zealand/2009/August/7

 category=August 7, 2009 category=Published category=New Zealand notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:New Zealand/2009/August/7


text:
Category:August 8, 2009

cs:Kategorie:8. srpen 2009 es:Categoría:8 de agosto de 2009 fr:Catégorie:8 août 2009 ko:분류:2009년 8월 9일 it:Categoria:8 agosto 2009 ja:カテゴリ:2009年8月8日 pl:Kategoria:8 sierpnia 2009 pt:Categoria:8 de agosto de 2009 ru:Категория:8 августа 2009 sr:Категорија:8. август 2009. fi:Luokka:8. elokuuta 2009 ta:பகுப்பு:ஆகஸ்ட் 8, 2009 zh:Category:2009年8月8日

title: Category:August 8, 2009


text:
Wikinews:2009/August/8

 category=Published category=August 8, 2009 notcategory=Disputed notcategory=No publish suppresserrors=true stablepages=only showcurid=true

fr:Wikinews:2009/août/08 it:Wikinotizie:2009/agosto/8 hu:Wikihírek:2009. augusztus 8. nl:Wikinews:2009/augustus/8 ja:ウィキニュース:2009年/8月/8日 pt:Wikinotícias:2009/agosto/8 sr:Викивести:8. август 2009. fi:Wikiuutiset:8. elokuuta 2009 zh:Wikinews:2009年/8月/8日

title: Wikinews:2009/August/8


text:
Portal:Australia/2009/August/8

 category=August 8, 2009 category=Published category=Australia notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:Australia/2009/August/8


text:
Portal:New Zealand/2009/August/8

 category=August 8, 2009 category=Published category=New Zealand notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:New Zealand/2009/August/8


text:
Category:August 9, 2009

ar:تصنيف:9 أغسطس 2009 cs:Kategorie:9. srpen 2009 de:Kategorie:09.08.2009 es:Categoría:9 de agosto de 2009 fr:Catégorie:9 août 2009 it:Categoria:9 agosto 2009 ja:カテゴリ:2009年8月9日 pl:Kategoria:9 sierpnia 2009 pt:Categoria:9 de agosto de 2009 ru:Категория:9 августа 2009 sr:Категорија:9. август 2009. fi:Luokka:9. elokuuta 2009 sv:Kategori:9 augusti 2009 ta:பகுப்பு:ஆகஸ்ட் 9, 2009 zh:Category:2009年8月9日

title: Category:August 9, 2009


text:
Wikinews:2009/August/9

 category=Published category=August 9, 2009 notcategory=Disputed notcategory=No publish suppresserrors=true stablepages=only showcurid=true

fr:Wikinews:2009/août/09 it:Wikinotizie:2009/agosto/9 hu:Wikihírek:2009. augusztus 9. nl:Wikinews:2009/augustus/9 ja:ウィキニュース:2009年/8月/9日 pt:Wikinotícias:2009/agosto/9 sr:Викивести:9. август 2009. fi:Wikiuutiset:9. elokuuta 2009 zh:Wikinews:2009年/8月/9日

title: Wikinews:2009/August/9


text:
Portal:Australia/2009/August/9

 category=August 9, 2009 category=Published category=Australia notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:Australia/2009/August/9


text:
Portal:New Zealand/2009/August/9

 category=August 9, 2009 category=Published category=New Zealand notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:New Zealand/2009/August/9


text:
Category:August 10, 2009

cs:Kategorie:10. srpen 2009 es:Categoría:10 de agosto de 2009 fr:Catégorie:10 août 2009 it:Categoria:10 agosto 2009 ja:カテゴリ:2009年8月10日 pl:Kategoria:10 sierpnia 2009 pt:Categoria:10 de agosto de 2009 ru:Категория:10 августа 2009 sr:Категорија:10. август 2009. fi:Luokka:10. elokuuta 2009 ta:பகுப்பு:ஆகஸ்ட் 10, 2009 zh:Category:2009年8月10日

title: Category:August 10, 2009


text:
Wikinews:2009/August/10

 category=Published category=August 10, 2009 notcategory=Disputed notcategory=No publish suppresserrors=true stablepages=only showcurid=true

fr:Wikinews:2009/août/10 it:Wikinotizie:2009/agosto/10 hu:Wikihírek:2009. augusztus 10. nl:Wikinews:2009/augustus/10 ja:ウィキニュース:2009年/8月/10日 pt:Wikinotícias:2009/agosto/10 sr:Викивести:10. август 2009. fi:Wikiuutiset:10. elokuuta 2009 zh:Wikinews:2009年/8月/10日

title: Wikinews:2009/August/10


text:
Portal:Australia/2009/August/10

 category=August 10, 2009 category=Published category=Australia notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:Australia/2009/August/10


text:
Portal:New Zealand/2009/August/10

 category=August 10, 2009 category=Published category=New Zealand notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:New Zealand/2009/August/10


text:
Category:August 11, 2009

ar:تصنيف:11 أغسطس 2009 cs:Kategorie:11. srpen 2009 de:Kategorie:11.08.2009 es:Categoría:11 de agosto de 2009 fr:Catégorie:11 août 2009 ko:분류:2009년 8월 11일 it:Categoria:11 agosto 2009 ja:カテゴリ:2009年8月11日 pl:Kategoria:11 sierpnia 2009 pt:Categoria:11 de agosto de 2009 ro:Categorie:11 august 2009 ru:Категория:11 августа 2009 sr:Категорија:11. август 2009. fi:Luokka:11. elokuuta 2009 ta:பகுப்பு:ஆகஸ்ட் 11, 2009 zh:Category:2009年8月11日

title: Category:August 11, 2009


text:
Wikinews:2009/August/11

 category=Published category=August 11, 2009 notcategory=Disputed notcategory=No publish suppresserrors=true stablepages=only showcurid=true

fr:Wikinews:2009/août/11 it:Wikinotizie:2009/agosto/11 hu:Wikihírek:2009. augusztus 11. nl:Wikinews:2009/augustus/11 ja:ウィキニュース:2009年/8月/11日 pt:Wikinotícias:2009/agosto/11 sr:Викивести:11. август 2009. fi:Wikiuutiset:11. elokuuta 2009 zh:Wikinews:2009年/8月/11日

title: Wikinews:2009/August/11


text:
Portal:Australia/2009/August/11

 category=August 11, 2009 category=Published category=Australia notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:Australia/2009/August/11


text:
Portal:New Zealand/2009/August/11

 category=August 11, 2009 category=Published category=New Zealand notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:New Zealand/2009/August/11


text:
Category:August 12, 2009

ar:تصنيف:12 أغسطس 2009 es:Categoría:12 de agosto de 2009 fr:Catégorie:12 août 2009 it:Categoria:12 agosto 2009 hu:Kategória:2009. augusztus 12. ja:Category:2009年8月12日 pl:Kategoria:12 sierpnia 2009 pt:Categoria:12 de agosto de 2009 sr:Категорија:12. август 2009. fi:Luokka:12. elokuuta 2009 ta:பகுப்பு:ஆகஸ்ட் 12, 2009 zh:Category:2009年8月12日

title: Category:August 12, 2009


text:
Wikinews:2009/August/12

 category=Published category=August 12, 2009 notcategory=Disputed notcategory=No publish suppresserrors=true stablepages=only showcurid=true

fr:Wikinews:2009/août/12 it:Wikinotizie:2009/agosto/12 hu:Wikihírek:2009. augusztus 12. nl:Wikinews:2009/augustus/12 ja:ウィキニュース:2009年/8月/12日 pt:Wikinotícias:2009/agosto/12 sr:Викивести:12. август 2009. fi:Wikiuutiset:12. elokuuta 2009 zh:Wikinews:2009年/8月/12日

title: Wikinews:2009/August/12


text:
Portal:Australia/2009/August/12

 category=August 12, 2009 category=Published category=Australia notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:Australia/2009/August/12


text:
Portal:New Zealand/2009/August/12

 category=August 12, 2009 category=Published category=New Zealand notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:New Zealand/2009/August/12


text:
Category:August 13, 2009

es:Categoría:13 de agosto de 2009 fr:Catégorie:13 août 2009 it:Categoria:13 agosto 2009 hu:Kategória:2009. augusztus 13. ja:Category:2009年8月13日 pl:Kategoria:13 sierpnia 2009 pt:Categoria:13 de agosto de 2009 ru:Категория:13 августа 2009 sr:Категорија:13. август 2009. fi:Luokka:13. elokuuta 2009 ta:பகுப்பு:ஆகஸ்ட் 13, 2009 tr:Kategori:2009/08/13 zh:Category:2009年8月13日

title: Category:August 13, 2009


text:
Wikinews:2009/August/13

 category=Published category=August 13, 2009 notcategory=Disputed notcategory=No publish suppresserrors=true stablepages=only showcurid=true

fr:Wikinews:2009/août/13 it:Wikinotizie:2009/agosto/13 hu:Wikihírek:2009. augusztus 13. nl:Wikinews:2009/augustus/13 ja:ウィキニュース:2009年/8月/13日 pt:Wikinotícias:2009/agosto/13 sr:Викивести:13. август 2009. fi:Wikiuutiset:13. elokuuta 2009 zh:Wikinews:2009年/8月/13日

title: Wikinews:2009/August/13


text:
Portal:Australia/2009/August/13

 category=August 13, 2009 category=Published category=Australia notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:Australia/2009/August/13


text:
Portal:New Zealand/2009/August/13

 category=August 13, 2009 category=Published category=New Zealand notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:New Zealand/2009/August/13


text:
Category:August 14, 2009

cs:Kategorie:14. srpen 2009 de:Kategorie:14.08.2009 es:Categoría:14 de agosto de 2009 fr:Catégorie:14 août 2009 it:Categoria:14 agosto 2009 ja:カテゴリ:2009年8月14日 pl:Kategoria:14 sierpnia 2009 pt:Categoria:14 de agosto de 2009 ro:Categorie:14 august 2009 ru:Категория:14 августа 2009 sr:Категорија:14. август 2009. fi:Luokka:14. elokuuta 2009 ta:பகுப்பு:ஆகஸ்ட் 14, 2009 zh:Category:2009年8月14日

title: Category:August 14, 2009


text:
Wikinews:2009/August/14

 category=Published category=August 14, 2009 notcategory=Disputed notcategory=No publish suppresserrors=true stablepages=only showcurid=true

fr:Wikinews:2009/août/14 it:Wikinotizie:2009/agosto/14 hu:Wikihírek:2009. augusztus 14. nl:Wikinews:2009/augustus/14 ja:ウィキニュース:2009年/8月/14日 pt:Wikinotícias:2009/agosto/14 sr:Викивести:14. август 2009. fi:Wikiuutiset:14. elokuuta 2009 zh:Wikinews:2009年/8月/14日

title: Wikinews:2009/August/14


text:
Portal:Australia/2009/August/14

 category=August 14, 2009 category=Published category=Australia notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:Australia/2009/August/14


text:
Portal:New Zealand/2009/August/14

 category=August 14, 2009 category=Published category=New Zealand notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:New Zealand/2009/August/14


text:
Category:August 15, 2009

es:Categoría:15 de agosto de 2009 fr:Catégorie:15 août 2009 it:Categoria:15 agosto 2009 hu:Kategória:2009. augusztus 15. ja:Category:2009年8月15日 pl:Kategoria:15 sierpnia 2009 pt:Categoria:15 de agosto de 2009 ru:Категория:15 августа 2009 sr:Категорија:15. август 2009. fi:Luokka:15. elokuuta 2009 ta:பகுப்பு:ஆகஸ்ட் 15, 2009 zh:Category:2009年8月15日

title: Category:August 15, 2009


text:
Wikinews:2009/August/15

 category=Published category=August 15, 2009 notcategory=Disputed notcategory=No publish suppresserrors=true stablepages=only showcurid=true

fr:Wikinews:2009/août/15 it:Wikinotizie:2009/agosto/15 hu:Wikihírek:2009. augusztus 15. nl:Wikinews:2009/augustus/15 ja:ウィキニュース:2009年/8月/15日 pt:Wikinotícias:2009/agosto/15 sr:Викивести:15. август 2009. fi:Wikiuutiset:15. elokuuta 2009 zh:Wikinews:2009年/8月/15日

title: Wikinews:2009/August/15


text:
Portal:Australia/2009/August/15

 category=August 15, 2009 category=Published category=Australia notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:Australia/2009/August/15


text:
Portal:New Zealand/2009/August/15

 category=August 15, 2009 category=Published category=New Zealand notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:New Zealand/2009/August/15


text:
Category:August 16, 2009

cs:Kategorie:16. srpen 2009 es:Categoría:16 de agosto de 2009 fr:Catégorie:16 août 2009 it:Categoria:16 agosto 2009 ja:カテゴリ:2009年8月16日 no:Kategori:16. august 2009 pl:Kategoria:16 sierpnia 2009 pt:Categoria:16 de agosto de 2009 ro:Categorie:16 august 2009 ru:Категория:16 августа 2009 sr:Категорија:16. август 2009. fi:Luokka:16. elokuuta 2009 ta:பகுப்பு:ஆகஸ்ட் 16, 2009 tr:Kategori:2009/08/16 zh:Category:2009年8月16日

title: Category:August 16, 2009


text:
Wikinews:2009/August/16

 category=Published category=August 16, 2009 notcategory=Disputed notcategory=No publish suppresserrors=true stablepages=only showcurid=true

fr:Wikinews:2009/août/16 it:Wikinotizie:2009/agosto/16 hu:Wikihírek:2009. augusztus 16. nl:Wikinews:2009/augustus/16 ja:ウィキニュース:2009年/8月/16日 pt:Wikinotícias:2009/agosto/16 sr:Викивести:16. август 2009. fi:Wikiuutiset:16. elokuuta 2009 zh:Wikinews:2009年/8月/16日

title: Wikinews:2009/August/16


text:
Portal:Australia/2009/August/16

 category=August 16, 2009 category=Published category=Australia notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:Australia/2009/August/16


text:
Portal:New Zealand/2009/August/16

 category=August 16, 2009 category=Published category=New Zealand notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:New Zealand/2009/August/16


text:
Category:August 17, 2009

ar:تصنيف:17 أغسطس 2009 es:Categoría:17 de agosto de 2009 fr:Catégorie:17 août 2009 it:Categoria:17 agosto 2009 ja:カテゴリ:2009年8月17日 no:Kategori:17. august 2009 pl:Kategoria:17 sierpnia 2009 pt:Categoria:17 de agosto de 2009 ro:Categorie:17 august 2009 ru:Категория:17 августа 2009 sr:Категорија:17. август 2009. fi:Luokka:17. elokuuta 2009 ta:பகுப்பு:ஆகஸ்ட் 17, 2009 tr:Kategori:2009/08/17 uk:Категорія:17 серпня 2009 zh:Category:2009年8月17日

title: Category:August 17, 2009


text:
Wikinews:2009/August/17

 category=Published category=August 17, 2009 notcategory=Disputed notcategory=No publish suppresserrors=true stablepages=only showcurid=true

fr:Wikinews:2009/août/17 it:Wikinotizie:2009/agosto/17 hu:Wikihírek:2009. augusztus 17. nl:Wikinews:2009/augustus/17 ja:ウィキニュース:2009年/8月/17日 pt:Wikinotícias:2009/agosto/17 sr:Викивести:17. август 2009. fi:Wikiuutiset:17. elokuuta 2009 zh:Wikinews:2009年/8月/17日

title: Wikinews:2009/August/17


text:
Portal:Australia/2009/August/17

 category=August 17, 2009 category=Published category=Australia notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:Australia/2009/August/17


text:
Portal:New Zealand/2009/August/17

 category=August 17, 2009 category=Published category=New Zealand notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:New Zealand/2009/August/17


text:
Category:August 18, 2009

ar:تصنيف:18 أغسطس 2009 cs:Kategorie:18. srpen 2009 es:Categoría:18 de agosto de 2009 fr:Catégorie:18 août 2009 it:Categoria:18 agosto 2009 ja:カテゴリ:2009年8月18日 pl:Kategoria:18 sierpnia 2009 pt:Categoria:18 de agosto de 2009 ro:Categorie:18 august 2009 ru:Категория:18 августа 2009 sr:Категорија:18. август 2009. fi:Luokka:18. elokuuta 2009 ta:பகுப்பு:ஆகஸ்ட் 18, 2009 tr:Kategori:2009/08/18 zh:Category:2009年8月18日

title: Category:August 18, 2009


text:
Wikinews:2009/August/18

 category=Published category=August 18, 2009 notcategory=Disputed notcategory=No publish suppresserrors=true stablepages=only showcurid=true

fr:Wikinews:2009/août/18 it:Wikinotizie:2009/agosto/18 hu:Wikihírek:2009. augusztus 18. nl:Wikinews:2009/augustus/18 ja:ウィキニュース:2009年/8月/18日 pt:Wikinotícias:2009/agosto/18 sr:Викивести:18. август 2009. fi:Wikiuutiset:18. elokuuta 2009 zh:Wikinews:2009年/8月/18日

title: Wikinews:2009/August/18


text:
Portal:Australia/2009/August/18

 category=August 18, 2009 category=Published category=Australia notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:Australia/2009/August/18


text:
Portal:New Zealand/2009/August/18

 category=August 18, 2009 category=Published category=New Zealand notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:New Zealand/2009/August/18


text:
Category:August 19, 2009

ar:تصنيف:19 أغسطس 2009 cs:Kategorie:19. srpen 2009 de:Kategorie:19.08.2009 es:Categoría:19 de agosto de 2009 fr:Catégorie:19 août 2009 it:Categoria:19 agosto 2009 ja:カテゴリ:2009年8月19日 pl:Kategoria:19 sierpnia 2009 pt:Categoria:19 de agosto de 2009 ro:Categorie:19 august 2009 ru:Категория:19 августа 2009 sr:Категорија:19. август 2009. fi:Luokka:19. elokuuta 2009 ta:பகுப்பு:ஆகஸ்ட் 19, 2009 tr:Kategori:2009/08/19 zh:Category:2009年8月19日

title: Category:August 19, 2009


text:
Wikinews:2009/August/19

 category=Published category=August 19, 2009 notcategory=Disputed notcategory=No publish suppresserrors=true stablepages=only showcurid=true

fr:Wikinews:2009/août/19 it:Wikinotizie:2009/agosto/19 hu:Wikihírek:2009. augusztus 19. nl:Wikinews:2009/augustus/19 ja:ウィキニュース:2009年/8月/19日 pt:Wikinotícias:2009/agosto/19 sr:Викивести:19. август 2009. fi:Wikiuutiset:19. elokuuta 2009 zh:Wikinews:2009年/8月/19日

title: Wikinews:2009/August/19


text:
Portal:Australia/2009/August/19

 category=August 19, 2009 category=Published category=Australia notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:Australia/2009/August/19


text:
Portal:New Zealand/2009/August/19

 category=August 19, 2009 category=Published category=New Zealand notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:New Zealand/2009/August/19


text:
Category:August 20, 2009

ar:تصنيف:20 أغسطس 2009 de:Kategorie:20.08.2009 es:Categoría:20 de agosto de 2009 fr:Catégorie:20 août 2009 it:Categoria:20 agosto 2009 hu:Kategória:2009. augusztus 20. ja:Category:2009年8月20日 pl:Kategoria:20 sierpnia 2009 pt:Categoria:20 de agosto de 2009 ro:Categorie:20 august 2009 ru:Категория:20 августа 2009 sr:Категорија:20. август 2009. fi:Luokka:20. elokuuta 2009 ta:பகுப்பு:ஆகஸ்ட் 20, 2009 tr:Kategori:2009/08/20 zh:Category:2009年8月20日

title: Category:August 20, 2009


text:
Wikinews:2009/August/20

 category=Published category=August 20, 2009 notcategory=Disputed notcategory=No publish suppresserrors=true stablepages=only showcurid=true

fr:Wikinews:2009/août/20 it:Wikinotizie:2009/agosto/20 hu:Wikihírek:2009. augusztus 20. nl:Wikinews:2009/augustus/20 ja:ウィキニュース:2009年/8月/20日 pt:Wikinotícias:2009/agosto/20 sr:Викивести:20. август 2009. fi:Wikiuutiset:20. elokuuta 2009 zh:Wikinews:2009年/8月/20日

title: Wikinews:2009/August/20


text:
Portal:Australia/2009/August/20

 category=August 20, 2009 category=Published category=Australia notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:Australia/2009/August/20


text:
Portal:New Zealand/2009/August/20

 category=August 20, 2009 category=Published category=New Zealand notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:New Zealand/2009/August/20


text:
Category:August 21, 2009

cs:Kategorie:21. srpen 2009 es:Categoría:21 de agosto de 2009 fr:Catégorie:21 août 2009 it:Categoria:21 agosto 2009 ja:カテゴリ:2009年8月21日 pl:Kategoria:21 sierpnia 2009 pt:Categoria:21 de agosto de 2009 ru:Категория:21 августа 2009 sr:Категорија:21. август 2009. fi:Luokka:21. elokuuta 2009 ta:பகுப்பு:ஆகஸ்ட் 21, 2009 tr:Kategori:2009/08/21 zh:Category:2009年8月21日

title: Category:August 21, 2009


text:
Wikinews:2009/August/21

 category=Published category=August 21, 2009 notcategory=Disputed notcategory=No publish suppresserrors=true stablepages=only showcurid=true

fr:Wikinews:2009/août/21 it:Wikinotizie:2009/agosto/21 hu:Wikihírek:2009. augusztus 21. nl:Wikinews:2009/augustus/21 ja:ウィキニュース:2009年/8月/21日 pt:Wikinotícias:2009/agosto/21 sr:Викивести:21. август 2009. fi:Wikiuutiset:21. elokuuta 2009 zh:Wikinews:2009年/8月/21日

title: Wikinews:2009/August/21


text:
Portal:Australia/2009/August/21

 category=August 21, 2009 category=Published category=Australia notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:Australia/2009/August/21


text:
Portal:New Zealand/2009/August/21

 category=August 21, 2009 category=Published category=New Zealand notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:New Zealand/2009/August/21


text:
Category:August 22, 2009

ar:تصنيف:22 أغسطس 2009 es:Categoría:22 de agosto de 2009 fr:Catégorie:22 août 2009 it:Categoria:22 agosto 2009 hu:Kategória:2009. augusztus 22. ja:Category:2009年8月22日 no:Kategori:22. august 2009 pl:Kategoria:22 sierpnia 2009 pt:Categoria:22 de agosto de 2009 ro:Categorie:22 august 2009 ru:Категория:22 августа 2009 sr:Категорија:22. август 2009. fi:Luokka:22. elokuuta 2009 ta:பகுப்பு:ஆகஸ்ட் 22, 2009 tr:Kategori:2009/08/22 zh:Category:2009年8月22日

title: Category:August 22, 2009


text:
Wikinews:2009/August/22

 category=Published category=August 22, 2009 notcategory=Disputed notcategory=No publish suppresserrors=true stablepages=only showcurid=true

fr:Wikinews:2009/août/22 it:Wikinotizie:2009/agosto/22 hu:Wikihírek:2009. augusztus 22. nl:Wikinews:2009/augustus/22 ja:ウィキニュース:2009年/8月/22日 pt:Wikinotícias:2009/agosto/22 sr:Викивести:22. август 2009. fi:Wikiuutiset:22. elokuuta 2009 zh:Wikinews:2009年/8月/22日

title: Wikinews:2009/August/22


text:
Portal:Australia/2009/August/22

 category=August 22, 2009 category=Published category=Australia notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:Australia/2009/August/22


text:
Portal:New Zealand/2009/August/22

 category=August 22, 2009 category=Published category=New Zealand notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:New Zealand/2009/August/22


text:
Category:August 23, 2009

es:Categoría:23 de agosto de 2009 fr:Catégorie:23 août 2009 it:Categoria:23 agosto 2009 hu:Kategória:2009. augusztus 23. ja:Category:2009年8月23日 pl:Kategoria:23 sierpnia 2009 pt:Categoria:23 de agosto de 2009 ru:Категория:23 августа 2009 sr:Категорија:23. август 2009. fi:Luokka:23. elokuuta 2009 ta:பகுப்பு:ஆகஸ்ட் 23, 2009 tr:Kategori:2009/08/23 zh:Category:2009年8月23日

title: Category:August 23, 2009


text:
Wikinews:2009/August/23

 category=Published category=August 23, 2009 notcategory=Disputed notcategory=No publish suppresserrors=true stablepages=only showcurid=true

fr:Wikinews:2009/août/23 it:Wikinotizie:2009/agosto/23 hu:Wikihírek:2009. augusztus 23. nl:Wikinews:2009/augustus/23 ja:ウィキニュース:2009年/8月/23日 pt:Wikinotícias:2009/agosto/23 sr:Викивести:23. август 2009. fi:Wikiuutiset:23. elokuuta 2009 zh:Wikinews:2009年/8月/23日

title: Wikinews:2009/August/23


text:
Portal:Australia/2009/August/23

 category=August 23, 2009 category=Published category=Australia notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:Australia/2009/August/23


text:
Portal:New Zealand/2009/August/23

 category=August 23, 2009 category=Published category=New Zealand notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:New Zealand/2009/August/23


text:
Category:August 24, 2009

de:Kategorie:24.08.2009 es:Categoría:24 de agosto de 2009 fr:Catégorie:24 août 2009 it:Categoria:24 agosto 2009 hu:Kategória:2009. augusztus 24. ja:Category:2009年8月24日 pl:Kategoria:24 sierpnia 2009 pt:Categoria:24 de agosto de 2009 ru:Категория:24 августа 2009 sr:Категорија:24. август 2009. fi:Luokka:24. elokuuta 2009 ta:பகுப்பு:ஆகஸ்ட் 24, 2009 tr:Kategori:2009/08/24 zh:Category:2009年8月24日

title: Category:August 24, 2009


text:
Wikinews:2009/August/24

 category=Published category=August 24, 2009 notcategory=Disputed notcategory=No publish suppresserrors=true stablepages=only showcurid=true

fr:Wikinews:2009/août/24 it:Wikinotizie:2009/agosto/24 hu:Wikihírek:2009. augusztus 24. nl:Wikinews:2009/augustus/24 ja:ウィキニュース:2009年/8月/24日 pt:Wikinotícias:2009/agosto/24 sr:Викивести:24. август 2009. fi:Wikiuutiset:24. elokuuta 2009 zh:Wikinews:2009年/8月/24日

title: Wikinews:2009/August/24


text:
Portal:Australia/2009/August/24

 category=August 24, 2009 category=Published category=Australia notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:Australia/2009/August/24


text:
Portal:New Zealand/2009/August/24

 category=August 24, 2009 category=Published category=New Zealand notcategory=Disputed suppresserrors=true stablepages=only

title: Portal:New Zealand/2009/August/24