text:
User talk:Sharunks007

-- 16:06, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sharunks007


text:
User talk:MindOverMetal

-- 16:36, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: User talk:MindOverMetal


text:
User talk:Ardacan99

-- 16:37, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ardacan99


text:
User talk:Muneshkg

-- 16:51, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Muneshkg


text:
User talk:Charlesramos

-- 16:56, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Charlesramos


text:
User talk:BRKY24

-- 16:58, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:BRKY24


text:
User talk:Janot04

-- 17:08, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Janot04


text:
User talk:Oneprincesslea

-- 17:16, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Oneprincesslea


text:
Thread:Comments:Wikileaks founder Julian Assange to be extradited to Sweden/Comments from feedback form - "No mention of Sweden's surpris..."

No mention of Sweden's surprise sex laws is included. It makes the "sexually assaulted four times" sound pretty vicious, and not very impartial.


text:
User talk:Fouragncy

-- 17:26, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Fouragncy


text:
User talk:Xrjust

-- 17:28, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Xrjust


text:
User talk:WEBDario

-- 17:31, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:WEBDario


text:
User talk:Chasgl

-- 17:31, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Chasgl


text:
User talk:Kol33 kol08

-- 17:33, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kol33 kol08


text:
User talk:Jakey342001

-- 17:35, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jakey342001


text:
User talk:Warch1LD

-- 17:38, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Warch1LD


text:
Thread:Comments:Wikileaks founder Julian Assange to be extradited to Sweden/Comments from feedback form - "My friend just told me an arti..."/reply

It was also report some months ago that both sexual encounters began as consensual, but Assange's condom broke in one case. It was also reported that originally the two women, who know each other and are friends, did not want to press charges. This was reported on NPR and other sources in the US.

It would be helpful if more information were available pertaining to the nature of these allegations and the history of how he came to be wanted for extradition. It seems there is not much information on the state of affairs regarding all of this in Sweden and exactly what he is alleged to have done. Terms like "sexual assault" have various meanings from inappropriate touching to brutal and forceful rape in various jurisdictions and thus are loaded words unless the specific allegations are know. Also, it is my understanding that Assange has not been formally charged in Sweden; he is wanted for questioning. Mattisse (talk) 17:49, 25 February 2011 (UTC)


text:
User talk:Mar40

-- 17:50, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mar40


text:
User talk:Singamugan

-- 18:17, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Singamugan


text:
User talk:Kanakthakare

-- 18:17, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kanakthakare


text:
User talk:Smenge32

-- 18:28, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Smenge32


text:
User talk:Sacsous2010

-- 18:37, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sacsous2010


text:
User talk:Sofia.lotussen

-- 18:41, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sofia.lotussen


text:
User talk:Juliane P.

-- 18:54, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Juliane P.


text:
User talk:Arctrum

-- 18:58, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Arctrum


text:
User talk:Sonabona

-- 19:41, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sonabona


text:
User talk:Afrimada

-- 19:43, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Afrimada


text:
User talk:Penny-pinching duck

-- 20:05, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Penny-pinching duck


text:
User talk:Cuca2005

-- 20:08, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Cuca2005


text:
User talk:Bombaysun

-- 20:32, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bombaysun


text:
User talk:Dustinhallen

-- 20:49, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dustinhallen


text:
User talk:Asifkha100

-- 20:59, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Asifkha100


text:
User talk:Saivemuri

-- 21:00, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Saivemuri


text:
User talk:Cassiano cavalheiro

-- 21:01, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Cassiano cavalheiro


text:
Comments:Music producer Phil Spector convicted of murder

Comments from feedback form - "Could do with more Information..."
Could do with more Information.... —77.208.195.91 (talk) 21:09, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

 * There is NO credibility to a suicide claim by Spector because the actress instructed the limo driver to remain present because"this (wait) won't be long". Lana clearly expected to be leaving (alive) very shortly. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 2600:100c:b019:75a8:3827:9423:c108:76f0 (talk • contribs) 17:33, 16 March 2017

 * Logically that reasoning is about deliberate suicide. --Pi zero (talk) 17:51, 16 March 2017 (UTC)


text:
User talk:Chsivic

-- 21:18, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Chsivic


text:
User talk:Hazlzz

-- 21:22, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hazlzz


text:
User talk:Morselfoundation

-- 21:59, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Morselfoundation


text:
User talk:Licorn

-- 22:06, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Licorn


text:
User talk:Kakashiruka

-- 22:39, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kakashiruka


text:
User talk:Teknopazzo

-- 23:07, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Teknopazzo


text:
User talk:Sammaa096

-- 23:15, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sammaa096


text:
User talk:Uttamo

-- 23:18, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Uttamo


text:
User talk:Marcell26

-- 23:21, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Marcell26


text:
User talk:Alenka.zitnik

-- 23:33, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Alenka.zitnik


text:
User talk:Roninscholar

-- 23:39, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Roninscholar


text:
User talk:Gliscor

-- 00:18, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gliscor


text:
User talk:DDennisM

-- 00:38, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:DDennisM


text:
User talk:Merteselle

-- 00:41, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Merteselle


text:
User talk:Robbie SWE

-- 00:44, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Robbie SWE


text:
User talk:Andreacassano82

-- 00:47, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Andreacassano82


text:
User talk:Divinity76

-- 01:01, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Divinity76


text:
User talk:MKY661

-- 01:02, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:MKY661


text:
User talk:Freedom in Spain

-- 01:08, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Freedom in Spain


text:
User talk:Parisoma1

-- 01:23, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Parisoma1


text:
User talk:Doc9871

-- 01:36, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Doc9871


text:
Talk:France calls on Libyan leader to step down

Errors
"Gadhafi" seems to be alternating between "Gaddafi" and "Gadhafi." Which one is it? --Ashershow1talk 18:58, 26 February 2011 (UTC)


text: Comments:France calls on Libyan leader to step down


text:
User talk:BabaGündüz

-- 02:04, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:BabaGündüz


text:
User talk:Schover36

-- 02:10, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Schover36


text:
User talk:GTOO

-- 02:21, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:GTOO


text:
User talk:Tristwin

-- 02:31, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tristwin


text:
User talk:Anthony Saab

-- 03:01, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Anthony Saab


text:
User talk:احمدحسن زكى

-- 03:02, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:احمدحسن زكى


text:
User talk:MDXDave

-- 03:10, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:MDXDave


text:
Thread:Comments:Phones without Internet access join the Facebook revolution/Comments from feedback form - "this reads like a press releas..."/reply

That may be because part of it is sourced from a press release :) How else do we get information, it's a release for the press :D


text:
User talk:Mztayyab

-- 03:30, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mztayyab


text:
Thread:Comments:Moon water possibly originated from comets, data shows/Comments from feedback form - "well its a good page"

well its a good page


text:
Thread:Comments:'Very serious': Chinese government releases corruption report/"Very Serious" indeed/reply (3)

what i wanna say is fuck CCP and never trust it!


text:
User talk:Jwj2xx4

-- 03:53, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jwj2xx4


text:
Thread:Comments:At least 53 killed, over 90 injured in Shanghai apartment fire/only weld worker arrest as the end of the accident

four weld worker full responsible for the accident no officer,no company owner responsible for it what a funny punishment,FUCK CCP and GOV


text:
User talk:Formulawater

-- 04:22, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Formulawater


text:
User talk:Topynate

-- 04:27, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Topynate


text:
User talk:Chorobek

-- 04:45, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Chorobek


text:
Thread:Comments:France calls on Libyan leader to step down/France should invade Libya.

France should invade Libya. Re-establish Colonial Africa.


text:
User talk:Srjban

-- 05:09, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Srjban


text:
User talk:Ajar saya

-- 05:10, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ajar saya


text:
User talk:Hypo85

-- 05:37, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hypo85


text:
User talk:Late54

-- 05:40, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Late54


text:
User talk:Andreigarcia

-- 05:50, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Andreigarcia


text:
User talk:Coderun

-- 06:22, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Coderun


text:
User talk:Daniel Musto

-- 06:53, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Daniel Musto


text:
User talk:Pokrywa1

-- 07:00, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Pokrywa1


text:
User talk:Beta600

-- 07:07, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Beta600


text:
User talk:Carriethomson

-- 07:10, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Carriethomson


text:
User talk:92.97.248.94

Welcome
Thanks for experimenting with Wikinews. Your test worked, and has now been reverted or removed. Please use Sandbox for any other tests you want to do, since testing in articles may disrupt the site's working and will be reverted quickly. , welcome to Wikinews! Please refrain from using content pages for testing. Here are a few good links for newcomers on how to edit Wikinews:

Our key policies - if you read anything, read these! Here a few pointers to help you get to know Wikinews: There are always things to do on Wikinews: By the way, you can sign your name on Talk pages using four tildes ( ~~~~ ), which produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, you can ask them at the water cooler or to anyone on the Welcommittee, or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! — Mike moral  ♪♫  07:12, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Neutral point of view - tell every side to a story in a fair and balanced way
 * Cite sources - everything in a Wikinews article must be sourced
 * Introduction - overview of the site
 * Writing an article - how to write and publish a complete article
 * Content guide - what's suitable for Wikinews
 * Style guide - how an article should look before publishing
 * Contents - the contents page.
 * Existing articles need expanding and checking for spelling and mistakes
 * The front page lead articles often need updating
 * Developing stories need finishing and publishing
 * Discussions need your input
 * And of course, stories need writing!

title: User talk:92.97.248.94


text:
User talk:Wayne99992000

-- 07:23, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Wayne99992000


text:
User talk:Faithwire

-- 07:46, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Faithwire


text:
User talk:Silence1998

-- 07:54, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Silence1998


text:
User talk:Kashan21

-- 08:19, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kashan21


text:
User talk:Zetaalberto

-- 08:31, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Zetaalberto


text:
User talk:Pnskumar

-- 08:41, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Pnskumar


text:
User talk:Jyo81

-- 08:49, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jyo81


text:
User talk:Mgm365

-- 09:28, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mgm365


text:
User talk:Escho2

-- 09:34, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Escho2


text:
User talk:Rcsprinter123

-- 09:37, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rcsprinter123


text:
User talk:Stanthewiseman

-- 10:11, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Stanthewiseman


text:
User talk:Misak.sro

-- 10:24, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Misak.sro


text:
User talk:Luigi936

-- 10:33, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Luigi936


text:
User talk:Stephen nax bandung

-- 10:34, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Stephen nax bandung


text:
User talk:TTucbka

-- 10:51, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:TTucbka


text:
User talk:Alavna

-- 10:51, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Alavna


text:
User talk:Jibu1105

-- 11:02, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jibu1105


text:
User talk:Qypchak

-- 11:03, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Qypchak


text:
User talk:Der Golem

-- 11:20, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Der Golem


text:
User talk:Drifter 2

-- 11:22, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Drifter 2


text:
User talk:Franco.ro

-- 11:33, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Franco.ro


text:
User talk:Sarup ani

-- 11:34, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sarup ani


text:
User talk:JerryB52

-- 11:44, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:JerryB52


text:
User talk:Mehboob Desai

-- 11:46, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mehboob Desai


text:
User talk:Djupadal

-- 12:01, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Djupadal


text:
User talk:Fiskjuice

-- 12:06, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Fiskjuice


text:
User talk:Shardan

-- 12:07, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Shardan


text:
User talk:Rohan.vangal

-- 12:08, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rohan.vangal


text:
User talk:Виталий7

-- 12:32, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Виталий7


text:
User talk:Ole Hallund

-- 12:37, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ole Hallund


text:
User talk:Auriukux

-- 12:39, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Auriukux


text:
User talk:Mrt1367

-- 12:45, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mrt1367


text:
User talk:Parksinta

-- 13:11, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Parksinta


text:
User talk:Chrischung1123

-- 13:14, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Chrischung1123


text:
User talk:Jskustumz

-- 13:22, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jskustumz


text:
User talk:Brocky10

-- 13:22, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Brocky10


text:
Talk:Opposition Leader predicts 'people's revolt' in Australia over carbon tax

Review of revision 1185632 [Passed]

 * Why is this article dated February 26 when both source articles are dated February 24? Mattisse (talk) 23:13, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Because the 26th is when we published it. It's dated from the day we publish an article, not the source date :) BarkingFish (talk) 23:16, 28 February 2011 (UTC)


text: Comments:Opposition Leader predicts 'people's revolt' in Australia over carbon tax


text:
User talk:Longinus876

-- 13:51, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Longinus876


text:
User talk:Smoken Flames

-- 14:06, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Smoken Flames


text:
User talk:Boohaah

-- 14:09, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Boohaah


text:
User talk:Hayajiri

-- 14:11, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hayajiri


text:
User talk:Traumasantidote

-- 14:20, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Traumasantidote


text:
User talk:Tijntacken1

-- 14:43, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tijntacken1


text:
User talk:Manhunt~enwikinews

-- 15:04, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Please do not make unfounded insults towards other users, like you did here. Doing so may result in your editing rights being permanently rescinded. Regards, — μ 15:53, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Manhunt. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Manhunt~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:21, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:34, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Manhunt~enwikinews


text:
User talk:Randy55947

-- 15:24, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Randy55947


text:
User talk:Vzazzy

-- 15:28, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Vzazzy


text:
User talk:Fottry55i6

-- 15:33, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Fottry55i6


text:
User talk:Maxan93

-- 15:36, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Maxan93


text:
User talk:Sulake4d

-- 15:39, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sulake4d


text:
User talk:StefanoF87

-- 15:40, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:StefanoF87


text:
User talk:-AmortentiA-

-- 15:47, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:-AmortentiA-


text:
User talk:Palarierul

-- 15:49, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Palarierul


text:
User talk:Margu46

-- 15:53, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Margu46


text:
User talk:Alejandrogalante

-- 16:02, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Alejandrogalante


text:
User talk:Borsippa66

-- 16:06, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Borsippa66


text:
User talk:Zarmail

-- 16:18, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Zarmail


text:
User talk:Lua12

-- 16:30, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lua12


text:
User talk:Lohiyab

-- 16:37, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lohiyab


text:
User talk:Miteshshah15

-- 16:50, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Miteshshah15


text:
User talk:Tranducsang68

-- 16:53, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tranducsang68


text:
User talk:Darafast

-- 17:04, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Darafast


text:
User talk:Kartrait

-- 17:05, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kartrait


text:
User talk:Aaadddaaammm

-- 17:06, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Aaadddaaammm


text:
User talk:AbhisheksinghWIKI

-- 17:32, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:AbhisheksinghWIKI


text:
User talk:Avishekdan

-- 17:33, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Avishekdan


text:
User talk:OppidumNissenae

-- 17:49, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:OppidumNissenae


text:
User talk:Soultaker16

-- 17:54, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Soultaker16


text:
Candle knocked over during voodoo sex ritual causes apartment fire

February 26, 2011

An elderly Brooklyn, New York woman was found dead yesterday after a fire triggered by a voodoo ceremony caused a blaze in an apartment that left dozens homeless. The details of the ceremony were not clear, but sources say it  led to sex.

An unidentified woman hired a priest for $300, identified as Nelson (Pepe) Pierre, to perform a mystic ceremony  meant to bring her good luck. The woman went to Pierre's apartment, where she ended up in bed surrounded by  lit candles which were mistakenly knocked over,  setting the bedsheets on fire. In an effort to suppress the flames, Pierre splashed water from the bathroom sink on the sheets while his roommate, who was ironing at the time, opened a window for air. However, according to the, wind gusting through the open window created a "blowtorch effect" which caused the fire to spread to the 4th floor hallway and into the 5th and 6th floors. The blaze killed one woman, three others were severely injured, and at least 20 firefighters were left with burn wounds.

In an NYFD statement, Fire Commissioner said, "Time and time again we respond to tragedies that could have been so easily prevented.  This fire had so many of those elements ... hopefully others will learn from this tragedy." It took hours for hundreds of firemen from dozens of companies to bring the raging fire under control.

Pierre, a man in his 60s, did not call right away, but attempted to quell the fire  using water from the bathroom sink. A source in law enforcement said, "Nobody sees a crime right now. It was an accident.  Maybe they weren't careful, but they did try to put it out."

Mary Feagin, a 64-year old retired teacher, died in the blaze.

The is currently investigating the incident.


text:
Thread:Comments:2011 Cricket World Cup: India vs Bangladesh/Comments from feedback form - "good"

good


text:
User talk:Kshitijtoshniwal

-- 18:08, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kshitijtoshniwal


text:
User talk:Ahmedoguzhan

-- 18:11, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ahmedoguzhan


text:
User talk:Mehransmart

-- 18:16, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mehransmart


text:
User talk:Rahaf95

-- 18:21, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rahaf95


text:
Talk:Candle knocked over during voodoo sex ritual causes apartment fire

Review of revision 1185737 [Passed]
The article seems to be misleading. I don't see in either of the two sources the incident involved "a borderline-prostitution voodoo ceremony". Nor do the sources support that the priest did not call 911 because he "was apparently afraid of the legal repercussions". Mattisse (talk) 20:34, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The CNN source stated that the woman paid $300, while the NY Daily News source stated that they had sex. In my judgment, that's prostitution disguised as a "religious ceremony."  Thus I referred to it as "a borderline-prostitution voodoo ceremony."  If you can think of a more accurate term, be my guest.  --Ashershow1talk 20:39, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
 * That's your judgment; it is not reflected in the sources, neither of which mentions a concern over the legality of the religious ceremony. And this also is misleading: "However, despite the legally questionable nature of the encounter, a source in law enforcement said, "Nobody sees a crime right now. It was an accident. Maybe they weren't careful, but they did try to put it out." The legal question concerning law enforcement officials was whether the priest was legally at fault for not calling 911, not the legality of their sexual encounter. However, because the evidence indicated that he did try to put out the fire, they determined  he did was not legally at fault. The Wikinews focus on "a borderline-prostitution voodoo ceremony" seems misguided.  Mattisse (talk) 20:47, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

 * Even now, this reads like trashy Red Top sensationalism. The author should stop reading tabloids for a few months, refrain from watching Faux news, and try to find quality journalistic work to read. --Brian McNeil / talk 09:32, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Re-reading the above, I see the source of the gutter-style. The New York Daily News? Manhattan's answer to The Daily Mail. --Brian McNeil / talk 15:16, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't read tabloids. However, my experience at WN has been that only skimpy irrelevant articles like this one will be published.  When I write important articles, such as Controversial autism research found to be elaborate fraud, or Rahm Emanuel elected mayor of Chicago, they don't get reviewed until they're "stale," because reviewers aren't willing to read long NY Times or WSJ articles.  --Ashershow1talk 21:43, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I think you need to take a look at our past articles and articles some of us have written before you go making an insult like that. DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 00:07, 28 February 2011 (UTC)


text: Comments:Candle knocked over during voodoo sex ritual causes apartment fire


text:
User talk:Wikiwicked14

-- 18:28, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Wikiwicked14


text:
User talk:Landsend62

-- 18:32, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Landsend62


text:
User talk:Mohamed Séfir

-- 18:37, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mohamed Séfir


text:
User talk:Vaibhavshivhare

-- 19:02, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Vaibhavshivhare


text:
User talk:Adideutsch

-- 19:03, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Adideutsch


text:
User talk:ChrGermany

Please contact me here.

-- 19:05, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:ChrGermany


text:
Thread:Comments:Eleven children injured in Scottish school shooting; two teenagers detained/Question/reply

Nothing major is going on in Scotland right now... so yes, I wonder what their motive is?


text:
User talk:Krlos viera

-- 19:55, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Krlos viera


text:
User talk:Ksjagpal

-- 20:08, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ksjagpal


text:
User talk:Ozkar PC

-- 20:25, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ozkar PC


text:
User talk:Shir o khorshid

-- 20:40, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Shir o khorshid


text:
User talk:Tonyinman

-- 20:47, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tonyinman


text:
Space Shuttle Discovery arrives at International Space Station

February 26, 2011

The, flying the mission, has successfully rendezvoused and docked with the International Space Station (ISS) today at 18:14 UTC for what is scheduled to be the final time in its career.

Discovery is delivering six astronauts to the orbiting outpost, as well as station parts and supplies including the, the and , the first dexterous humanoid robot in space.

The docking, Discovery's 13th and final scheduled docking, occurred two minutes ahead of schedule, having been originally scheduled for 19:16 GMT today.

The hatch between the space shuttle and the ISS was opened at 20:16 UTC, after which the crew members of welcomed the crew of STS-133 aboard the station. The crew then participated in a safety briefing with Expedition 26 commander, while Shuttle Flight Director Bryan Lunney took part in a mission status briefing on the ground which began at 20:50 UTC.

Later on today, crew members and  are scheduled to move the ExPRESS Logistics Carrier-4 from the payload bay using the shuttle's robotic arm to the station's own robot arm for placement on the exterior of the orbital laboratory.

There was a delay in the docking mechanism's ability to make a seal between the two spacecraft during docking operations, so activities occurring later on in the day, including the transfer of ELC-4, may be delayed. This was primarily because of a mis-alignment between the docking systems of the shuttle and station due to gravitational effects. The entire delay took up approximately 40 minutes.

During Discovery's approach to the station earlier on today, the crew of Expedition 26 took pictures of the shuttle's underside from the station's windows in order to assist in analysis of the heat shield of the spacecraft.

NASA officials are debating whether or not to extend the mission an additional day for a photo shoot of the International Space Station, as it is currently host to six docked spacecraft from the United States, Russia, Europe, and Japan. A decision regarding this possibility is expected on Tuesday.

STS-133 is Space Shuttle Discovery's 39th and final scheduled mission into space and the program's 35th mission to the ISS, as well as the 133rd in the entire. There are two flights remaining before the retirement of the fleet that are still in planning: and.


text:
User talk:ClydeG312

-- 21:14, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:ClydeG312


text:
User talk:Extremeeater52

-- 21:15, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Extremeeater52


text:
User talk:Sentient Planet

-- 21:18, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sentient Planet


text:
Talk:Space Shuttle Discovery arrives at International Space Station

The docking times and hatch opening time was acquired from observation of live NASA TV broadcast online as the events happened. The technical and timing information regarding the delay in the hard-dock of the two spacecraft (shuttle and ISS) was acquired from the live mission status briefing on NASA TV. The same source was used for information regarding the installation of ELC-4 to the exterior of the ISS, as well as a few other details about flight events. Tyrol5 (talk) 22:34, 26 February 2011 (UTC)


text:
User talk:Ahmed20093

-- 21:29, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ahmed20093


text:
User talk:Sinka György

-- 21:34, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sinka György


text:
Category:Tripoli, Libya

fa:رده:طرابلس ko:분류:트리폴리 (리비아)

title: Category:Tripoli, Libya


text:
User talk:EYAAADI

-- 21:53, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:EYAAADI


text: Category:Tripoli, Lebanon

title: Category:Tripoli, Lebanon


text:
User talk:Lurrenz

-- 22:24, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lurrenz


text:
User talk:Morumoru123

-- 22:26, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Morumoru123


text:
User talk:Derekandes

-- 22:31, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Derekandes


text:
User talk:Dux.orientalis

-- 22:50, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dux.orientalis


text:
User talk:Light28

-- 22:58, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Light28


text: Comments:Space Shuttle Discovery arrives at International Space Station


text:
User talk:M3g4d37h

-- 23:06, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:M3g4d37h


text:
User talk:Mouh1105

-- 23:13, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mouh1105


text:
Thread:Comments:2011 Cricket World Cup: India vs Bangladesh/Comments from feedback form - "fantastic match"

fantastic match


text:
User talk:Scottk

-- 23:21, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Scottk


text:
User talk:Rusiok

-- 23:23, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rusiok


text:
User talk:Tmid

-- 23:24, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tmid


text:
User talk:Forxees

-- 23:32, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Forxees


text:
User talk:Mehdi golami

-- 23:49, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mehdi golami


text:
User talk:Bobbymassingham

-- 00:37, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bobbymassingham


text:
Thread:Comments:Opposition Leader predicts 'people's revolt' in Australia over carbon tax/Comments from feedback form - "I am a small business owner, a..."

I am a small business owner, and am frustrated with this current Government's incompetence of overspending and wasteful mismanagement of the taxpayers money on unnessecary projects (ie. insulation scheme, education stimulus, land based fast broadband... to name a few)and now to send Australians to the wall by introducing a hairbrained idea, promoted by the most idealistic but illogical party in Australian politics (The Greens). A tax on Carbon is ony going to drive more Australian businesses offshore and boost imports from China ( a country that won't care for carbon emmissions)In a essence we are only moving the worlds carbon emmisssions to another country whilst screwing the Australian people, but I guess that the fools running this Country didn't factor this in, with their narrow minded vision to impress a handful of countries in reducing carbon emmissions. I am now urging a Australians that will be affected by these new taxes, to stand up in opposition to this current Government and Vote no Confidence on the grounds of illogical policies and incompetent money management.


text:
User talk:Maxalig

-- 00:52, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Maxalig


text:
Tripoli

__DISAMBIG__

title: Tripoli


text:
User talk:Alex.bikfalvi

-- 01:05, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Alex.bikfalvi


text:
User talk:Kashifzubair

-- 01:11, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kashifzubair


text:
User talk:666LUCIFER999

-- 01:37, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:666LUCIFER999


text:
User talk:Bigbitgnom

-- 01:49, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bigbitgnom


text:
User talk:Agusfutbol2000

-- 02:02, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Agusfutbol2000


text:
User talk:Yosoyelbuenpio

-- 02:02, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Yosoyelbuenpio


text:
Thread:Comments:Phones without Internet access join the Facebook revolution/Hardly a technological breakthrough

Yes, it has many benefits, but it isn't nothing new, let alone a marvel of technlogy. Similar services existed for years.


text:
Category:Muammar al-Gaddafi

es:Categoría:Muamar el Gadafi fa:رده:معمر قذافی ko:분류:무아마르 카다피 it:Categoria:Mu'ammar Gheddafi sr:Категорија:Моамер ел Гадафи

title: Category:Muammar al-Gaddafi


text:
User talk:Mikehoops7

-- 02:16, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mikehoops7


text:
User talk:HighPerformanceHuman

-- 02:17, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:HighPerformanceHuman


text:
User talk:Sadasela

-- 02:22, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sadasela


text:
User talk:RomeEonBmbo

-- 02:34, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:RomeEonBmbo


text:
User talk:LunaAcónFotógrafa

-- 02:41, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:LunaAcónFotógrafa


text:
User talk:Sanpitch

-- 02:43, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sanpitch


text:
User talk:Drhankh

-- 02:57, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Drhankh


text:
User talk:KillerJho099

-- 03:01, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:KillerJho099


text:
User talk:BennFr

-- 03:16, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:BennFr


text:
User talk:Mostafabbas

-- 03:27, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mostafabbas


text:
User talk:Scootyking95

-- 03:28, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Scootyking95


text:
User talk:Annawillis uncg

-- 03:40, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Annawillis uncg


text:
Thread:Comments:Opposition Leader predicts 'people's revolt' in Australia over carbon tax/Bring on the new tax

Hi,

For many years of my life I have been a passionate Liberal Party supporter. I've worked hard, I've saved and invested a lot of money and am very financially comfortable. The thing is I always believed I needed the Liberal Party in power in order to keep building wealth. However these last few years have taught me that it makes no difference, I still make more money. New taxes hurt the poor, not the rich, yet the poor are the ones who vote Labor. They will have to pay and suffer accordingly. I've got no sympathy for them of course, I don't care if the cost of living goes up so high for average Australians that they can no longer cope. They made their own bed and now they have to lie in it. This is what they get for allowing this government to exist. For my childrens sake of course I want the Liberals back in power to give them every opportunity I had to make something of themselves. Its gotten to a point that I believe most middle Australians loathe success, they crave poverty and they are natural born losers. Conciously they will deny it but subconciously they relish in failure, every action in their lives is a psychic sabotage to set themselves up for continual fall after fall. This new tax on their standard of living will be another smack in the face for working families bringing on the subconcious masochism they desire. I hope eventually they will wake up and face reality. This ingrained culture of failure needs to stop.


text:
Thread:Comments:Opposition Leader predicts 'people's revolt' in Australia over carbon tax/Bring on the new tax (2)

Hi,

For many years of my life I have been a passionate Liberal Party supporter. I've worked hard, I've saved and invested a lot of money and am very financially comfortable. The thing is I always believed I needed the Liberal Party in power in order to keep building wealth. However these last few years have taught me that it makes no difference, I still make more money. New taxes hurt the poor, not the rich, yet the poor are the ones who vote Labor. They will have to pay and suffer accordingly. I've got no sympathy for them of course, I don't care if the cost of living goes up so high for average Australians that they can no longer cope. They made their own bed and now they have to lie in it. This is what they get for allowing this government to exist. For my childrens sake of course I want the Liberals back in power to give them every opportunity I had to make something of themselves. Its gotten to a point that I believe most middle Australians loathe success, they crave poverty and they are natural born losers. Conciously they will deny it but subconciously they relish in failure, every action in their lives is a psychic sabotage to set themselves up for continual fall after fall. This new tax on their standard of living will be another smack in the face for working families bringing on the subconcious masochism they desire. I hope eventually they will wake up and face reality. This ingrained culture of failure needs to stop.


text:
User talk:Wirast

-- 04:08, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Wirast


text:
User talk:Druiweplukker

-- 04:25, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Druiweplukker


text:
User talk:Oranginacup

-- 04:54, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Oranginacup


text:
User talk:Himanshu70

-- 04:56, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Himanshu70


text:
User talk:Allhuman2011

-- 05:03, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Allhuman2011


text:
Thread:Comments:Voodoo sex ritual leaves woman dead/Comments from feedback form - "misleading title"

misleading title


text:
Talk:Tense panel discussion on Srebrenica held in Belgrade

File replacement required
editprotected Please swap File:Serbian flag.png for File:Civil_Flag_of_Serbia_(2010).png. Commons replacement. Thanks. Billinghurst (talk) 05:34, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ — Mike moral  ♪♫  05:43, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Please swap File:Civil_Flag_of_Serbia_(2010).png for File:Civil_Flag_of_Serbia.svg. Commons replacement.

authors: Ранко Николић


text:
User talk:Erutuon

-- 05:40, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Erutuon


text:
User talk:Laura Fiorucci

-- 05:49, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Laura Fiorucci


text:
Thread:Comments:Voodoo sex ritual leaves woman dead/Comments from feedback form - "misleading title"/reply

Agreed. Neither Voodoo nor sex caused a fire - a candle knocked over did. It is frustrating to observe such a common story of negligence portrayed in a sensational fashion.


text:
User talk:Maximkaaa

-- 06:35, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Maximkaaa


text:
User talk:Сергей Шумаков

-- 06:56, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Сергей Шумаков


text:
User talk:Chrislawrencev

-- 07:23, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Chrislawrencev


text:
User talk:Ort037

-- 07:36, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ort037


text:
User talk:Głogowski

-- 07:48, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Głogowski


text:
User talk:Killa90

-- 07:49, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Killa90


text:
User talk:Xcalibr pat

-- 07:49, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Xcalibr pat


text:
User talk:Naveen~enwikinews

-- 08:11, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Naveen. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Naveen~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:19, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:34, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Naveen~enwikinews


text:
User talk:Fedewiki11

-- 08:16, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Fedewiki11


text:
User talk:Laurence Cox

-- 08:21, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Laurence Cox


text:
User talk:ヨーグルチョ

-- 08:22, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:ヨーグルチョ


text:
User talk:Mobilization

-- 08:22, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mobilization


text:
User talk:V8hotrod2

-- 08:22, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:V8hotrod2


text:
User talk:Winstonlighter

-- 08:42, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Winstonlighter


text:
User talk:Dimpledpimpledgirl

-- 08:49, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dimpledpimpledgirl


text:
User talk:Piya~enwikinews

-- 08:49, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Piya. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Piya~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:23, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:35, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Piya~enwikinews


text:
User talk:Ianmanderson

-- 09:03, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ianmanderson


text:
User talk:Raymond48

-- 09:04, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Raymond48


text:
User talk:Waveindia

-- 09:08, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Waveindia


text:
User talk:Sapnashahani

-- 09:10, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sapnashahani


text:
User talk:Jimmy.Chow

-- 09:13, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jimmy.Chow


text:
Thread:Comments:Voodoo sex ritual leaves woman dead/Comments from feedback form - "misleading title"/reply (2)

>:D


text:
User talk:Char90

-- 09:36, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Char90


text:
User talk:Flarit

-- 09:47, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Flarit


text:
User talk:Фларит Зариф

-- 09:47, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Фларит Зариф


text:
User talk:Flarit Zarif

-- 09:49, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Flarit Zarif


text:
User talk:Czaram

-- 10:03, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Czaram


text:
User talk:Adsaga

-- 10:08, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Adsaga


text:
Comments:Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince released

Comments from feedback form - "Brilliant"
Brilliant —59.93.8.230 (talk) 10:10, 27 February 2011 (UTC)


text:
User talk:Alpkocak

-- 10:23, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Alpkocak


text:
User talk:Nobiloo

-- 10:27, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nobiloo


text:
User talk:Tmallappa

-- 10:44, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tmallappa


text:
User talk:Bayram26

-- 10:52, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bayram26


text:
User talk:P30god

-- 11:02, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:P30god


text:
User talk:Expertini

-- 11:29, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Expertini


text:
User talk:Davidandrewkerr

-- 11:48, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Davidandrewkerr


text:
User talk:Thetiesthatbind

-- 12:00, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Thetiesthatbind


text:
User talk:Mikencjusz

-- 12:03, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mikencjusz


text:
User talk:Rohanvenky1

-- 12:03, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rohanvenky1


text:
User talk:Addallservices

-- 12:06, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Addallservices


text:
User talk:Ben1140

-- 12:09, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ben1140


text:
User talk:Vikkalys

-- 12:11, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Vikkalys


text:
Thread:Comments:Opposition Leader predicts 'people's revolt' in Australia over carbon tax/Comments from feedback form - "It is an Idea that should spre..."

It is an Idea that should spread to the us,but I do think it will because corporations can not make money on it. maybe it will come to pass if they can


text:
User talk:Milwaukee82

-- 12:14, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Milwaukee82


text:
User talk:MSynnott

-- 12:35, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:MSynnott


text:
User talk:Schoolsindia

-- 12:41, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Schoolsindia


text:
User talk:Erik1991

-- 12:47, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Erik1991


text:
User talk:Aiko

-- 12:53, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Aiko


text:
User talk:Volodyashka

-- 12:56, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Volodyashka


text:
User talk:I am who I am

-- 12:56, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:I am who I am


text:
User talk:Süm13

-- 12:57, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Süm13


text:
User talk:Wreebhoo

-- 13:06, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Wreebhoo


text:
User talk:Jamskas

-- 13:12, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jamskas


text:
User talk:Lieseloztunc

-- 13:20, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lieseloztunc


text:
User talk:Oscuritas

-- 13:27, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Oscuritas


text:
User talk:Annabeleagles

-- 13:39, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Annabeleagles


text:
User talk:Med.anouar.jridi

-- 13:40, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Med.anouar.jridi


text:
User talk:Zia khan

-- 13:53, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Zia khan


text:
User talk:Avarets

-- 14:02, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Avarets


text:
User talk:Sevgilim1321

-- 14:18, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sevgilim1321


text:
User talk:Solerone

-- 14:18, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Solerone


text:
User talk:Srinivasandelta

-- 14:24, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Srinivasandelta


text:
Thread:Comments:Voodoo sex ritual leaves woman dead/Comments from feedback form - "misleading title"/reply (3)

From what I've noticed English Wikinews seems to have a tradition of misleading title, although in this case I would argue that voodoo was indeed a cause of the fire. Voodoo is a joke, voodoo priests should be sent to jail for fraud, and those who seek their services to an insane asylum.


text:
User talk:Toot

-- 14:44, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Toot


text:
Thread:Comments:Opposition Leader predicts 'people's revolt' in Australia over carbon tax/It's just fearmongering.

Australia is being conned by the global warming fearmongering. Maybe they should make the tax optional so only those who have been brainwashed into thinking they care about the environment would waste their money on such nonsense.


text:
Comments:British police shoot man in anti-terrorism raid

Comments from feedback form - "I DO FAMILY HISTORY, AND HAVE ..."
I DO FAMILY HISTORY, AND HAVE FOUND OUT THAT NOT ALL REPORTS OR DOCUMENTATION CAN BE ORIGINAL OR BE SO ACCURATE THAT THEY ARE THE TRUTH - THE VICTORIOUS WILL ALWAYS SAY WHAT THEY WANT YOU TO HEAR.

THIS MAY HAVE MEANING FOR SOME, BUT AS I HAVE ONLY JUST FOUND IT OUT, I WILL BE CAREFUL FOR THE TIME BEING. SORRY!! —82.198.250.68 (talk) 14:52, 27 February 2011 (UTC)


text:
User talk:Boom3erang

-- 14:54, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Boom3erang


text:
Thread:Comments:France calls on Libyan leader to step down/France should invade Libya./reply

Lybia was Italian.


text:
User talk:Zeus2kx

-- 15:04, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Zeus2kx


text:
User talk:Dzambo

-- 15:05, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dzambo


text:
Thread:Comments:Candle knocked over during voodoo sex ritual causes apartment fire/...

"but sources say it led to sex"

Oh lawd I lol'd.


text:
User talk:Machstama

-- 15:33, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Machstama


text:
Thread:Comments:Libya blocks access to Internet/Comments from feedback form - "only a capatalistic view that ..."/reply

You can't even spell the name of the thing you hate.


text:
User talk:Вад!м

-- 15:58, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Вад!м


text:
User talk:Jazzaston

-- 16:05, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jazzaston


text:
User talk:B-Boy Rock-Star

-- 16:24, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:B-Boy Rock-Star


text:
User talk:Nyxonl

-- 16:24, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nyxonl


text:
User talk:Mingzhao357

-- 16:34, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mingzhao357


text:
User talk:Sweet principessa 95

-- 16:41, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sweet principessa 95


text:
User talk:Gcsanche

-- 16:42, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gcsanche


text:
User talk:Gobygoba

-- 16:43, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gobygoba


text:
User talk:Drakula.Rahul

-- 17:04, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Drakula.Rahul


text:
User talk:Ahmedeltiger

-- 17:15, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ahmedeltiger


text:
User talk:Strange Quirk

-- 17:19, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Strange Quirk


text:
User talk:Gertst

-- 18:03, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gertst


text:
User talk:Habtasia

-- 18:08, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Habtasia


text:
User talk:Gusotero

-- 18:10, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gusotero


text:
User talk:Sezai22

-- 18:13, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sezai22


text:
User talk:Shihachi

-- 18:14, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Shihachi


text:
User talk:DKrieger

-- 18:16, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:DKrieger


text:
User talk:Giotino

-- 18:22, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Giotino


text:
User talk:Digish.ladani

-- 18:41, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Digish.ladani


text:
User talk:Sgabetto

-- 18:43, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sgabetto


text:
User talk:Monk19

-- 18:55, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Monk19


text:
User talk:Tpxpress

-- 18:57, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tpxpress


text:
User talk:Beleza26

-- 19:00, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Beleza26


text:
User talk:Thaipinoyboy

-- 19:06, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Thaipinoyboy


text:
User talk:Shijukjohn01

-- 19:13, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Shijukjohn01


text:
User talk:Ollaka

-- 19:31, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ollaka


text:
User talk:Buttons0603

 Welcome to the talk page of GeorgeGriffiths!

For my user page, see here.

Diego Grez return fire 19:35, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Re:Sheffield_tram_evacuated_after_fire_fears
Your article here, Sheffield_tram_evacuated_after_fire_fears has been removed from publication or visibility on the site. This is because the article has no sources, is unreferenced, and has not been passed for publication by our peer review process. You are not authorised to simply write something and publish it without it being checked for errors or omissions by other editors or reviewers. The article has been moved to the development section, where you will be able to correct the issues I have listed above, and for future reference, please use the "Write an article" link in the toolbar on the left so that you follow the correct procedure for preparing an article for publication. BarkingFish (talk) 04:05, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Just a point of clarification. The article wasn't actually published. Because we allow anyone to write, you have to give full details of any Original reporting that you do on the talk page of the article. This is just to verify that the original reporting actually did happen. Once you are done with the article (And have added neccesary sources/explained where you got the OR content from), add review to the page to put it in the review queue to be reviewed. Cheers. Bawolff ☺☻ 21:36, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Your articles
Hey there! Thanks for writing some articles for us! There's a problem though: due to Wikinews's settings, only users with the reviewer permission can 'publish' articles — so all articles must be tagged review before the general public read it. To make sure your articles are reviewed in a timely fashion, please use the "create an article" box, found on the Main Page, or at the top of this one (click the tab marked "write an article"). — μ 12:10, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

 * I've reviewed a couple of your articles, which are great starts but they need some additional editing and information. I'd suggest you do a quick skim of our original reporting guidelines, if you haven't already, so I don't end up telling you what you already know. Can't wait to see this ready for publishing! -  Amgine | t 16:22, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Buttons0603


text:
User talk:Deuzeline

-- 19:53, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Deuzeline


text:
User talk:Hicksrobin42

-- 20:08, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hicksrobin42


text:
User talk:Pavitelu

-- 20:09, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Pavitelu


text:
User talk:Billmania

-- 20:24, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Billmania


text:
User talk:Charvat29

-- 20:34, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Charvat29


text:
User talk:ZXAHFLPOW

-- 20:46, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:ZXAHFLPOW


text:
User talk:Sarahcrayon

-- 20:49, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sarahcrayon


text:
User talk:Southtowner12

-- 21:04, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Southtowner12


text:
User talk:Roosevelt Isaac

-- 21:06, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Roosevelt Isaac


text:
User talk:Isabelmm

-- 21:15, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Isabelmm


text:
User talk:Swazmo

-- 21:39, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Swazmo


text:
User talk:Concordia69

-- 22:14, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Concordia69


text:
User talk:Paradise coyote

-- 22:21, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Paradise coyote


text:
User talk:Rich869

-- 22:29, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rich869


text:
User talk:Serg1980

-- 22:35, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Serg1980


text:
User talk:Fruit Flies Like a Banana

-- 22:41, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Fruit Flies Like a Banana


text:
User talk:Seanfletcher2

-- 22:44, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Seanfletcher2


text:
User talk:Samanthatesner

-- 22:59, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Samanthatesner


text:
User talk:Drnikhilth

-- 23:06, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Drnikhilth


text:
Thread:Comments:Pirates kill four American hostages/fuck

Fuck


text:
Thread:Comments:Pirates kill four American hostages/fuck/reply

Interesting analysis of the situation, I agree with most of what you said, although the "fuck" part was questionable.


text:
User talk:Devrajoh

-- 23:12, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Devrajoh


text:
Thread:Comments:Pirates kill four American hostages/fuck/reply (2)

Heh. Well,it sucks we couldn't end up with another maersk alabama


text:
User talk:Thomas G Mantis

-- 23:19, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Thomas G Mantis


text:
User talk:Esqua

-- 23:29, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Esqua


text:
User talk:Marty Girl13

-- 23:36, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Marty Girl13


text:
User talk:PatrickVedlog

-- 23:51, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:PatrickVedlog


text:
Jeff Gordon wins the 2011 Subway Fresh Fit 500

February 28, 2011

driver, who qualified 20th, won the  held on Sunday at  in , Arizona, United States. This became his first Sprint Cup win of the. Throughout the course of the race there were eight and 29 lead changes among twelve different drivers.

With ten laps remaining in the 312 lap race, was first, but Gordon passed him one lap later. Gordon maintained the lead to win the race, while Busch finished in the second position. took third, ahead of in fourth. managed the fifth position, after starting 14th on the grid. , from the, clinched the sixth position, after leading none of the laps during the race. followed Kahne in seventh, while could only manage eighth.

, and rounded out the top ten finishers in the race. After doing his, Gordon shouted, "That’s why I love racing. Hell, yeah." Following the race, Kyle Busch became leader with 80 points. Next, Kurt Busch was second with 77, eight points ahead of Stewart and Allmendinger. Gordon and was placed fifth and sixth with 65 points. , Newman,, and rounded out the top-ten point positions.

The 2011 season will continue on March 6, 2011 at for the 2011. The race will be televised in the US on Fox at 3:00 p.m. EST.


text:
User talk:Scottonsocks

-- 23:58, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Scottonsocks


text:
User talk:Bettonsm

-- 00:03, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bettonsm


text:
User talk:Rexday13

-- 00:13, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rexday13


text:
User talk:Nymets180

-- 00:54, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nymets180


text:
User talk:Mu 0128

-- 01:13, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mu 0128


text:
User talk:Sapega22

-- 01:23, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sapega22


text:
User talk:NINJA1200

-- 01:31, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:NINJA1200


text:
User talk:RikkaK

-- 01:50, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:RikkaK


text:
User talk:Tortorific

-- 01:58, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tortorific


text:
User talk:Embiopterid

-- 02:04, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Embiopterid


text:
User talk:BelleVictoire

-- 02:05, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:BelleVictoire


text:
User talk:RockSlaveBH

-- 02:09, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:RockSlaveBH


text:
User talk:Fatfox2002cn

-- 02:26, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Fatfox2002cn


text:
User talk:Josebarriga1973

-- 02:32, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Josebarriga1973


text:
User talk:The enemies of god

-- 02:37, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:The enemies of god


text:
User talk:Ashishakpal

-- 02:42, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ashishakpal


text:
User talk:Silviamfemia

-- 02:42, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Silviamfemia


text:
User talk:Danielskies

-- 02:49, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Danielskies


text:
User talk:ArDavP

-- 02:49, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:ArDavP


text:
User talk:MingTsay

-- 03:07, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:MingTsay


text:
User talk:Purplelightning69

-- 03:48, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Purplelightning69


text:
User talk:Ilo oll

-- 03:58, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ilo oll


text:
User talk:Wolfqwei

-- 03:59, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Wolfqwei


text:
User talk:Angelina1828

-- 04:04, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Angelina1828


text:
User talk:Czm600213

-- 04:12, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Czm600213


text:
User talk:Neokleon

-- 04:12, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Neokleon


text:
User talk:Tough345

-- 04:20, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tough345


text:
User talk:Liyan217

-- 04:26, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Liyan217


text:
User:Liyan217/vector.css

/* 字体大小 */
 * 1) bodyContent,#p-personal {font-size: 27px !important;}
 * 2) mw-panel>div:not([id="p-logo"]) {font-size: 24px !important;}

title: User:Liyan217/vector.css


text:
User talk:Jamesj7373

-- 04:56, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jamesj7373


text:
User talk:Zklink

-- 05:08, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Zklink


text:
User talk:Youngtilly

-- 05:15, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Youngtilly


text:
User talk:Breezy12news

-- 05:25, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Breezy12news


text:
User talk:KewlCrayon

-- 05:33, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:KewlCrayon


text:
Thread:Comments:Candle knocked over during voodoo sex ritual causes apartment fire/Comments from feedback form - "never knew voodoo sex could be..."

never knew voodoo sex could be that hot.


text:
User talk:Soheyl2

-- 06:13, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Soheyl2


text:
User talk:Pilaninews

-- 06:13, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Deleted content
Please do not recreate deleted content without a single change. Thanks — μ 09:34, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Do not recreate deleted content. Doing so will result in permanent revocation of your editing privileges. — μ 09:55, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Pilaninews


text:
User talk:Peheo95

-- 06:13, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Peheo95


text:
User talk:Stifersguys

-- 06:30, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Stifersguys


text:
User talk:General Sorkun

-- 06:59, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:General Sorkun


text:
User talk:Magician a k shah

-- 07:00, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Magician a k shah


text:
User talk:Vignash

-- 07:11, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Vignash


text:
User talk:AnAsianYouNeverHeardOfUntilNow

-- 07:42, 28 February 2011 (UTC)


text:
User talk:Jayasekaramucp

-- 07:46, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jayasekaramucp


text:
User talk:Pink.stylish.hearts

-- 08:26, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Pink.stylish.hearts


text:
User talk:Brusel

-- 08:31, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Brusel


text:
Thread:Comments:Opposition Leader predicts 'people's revolt' in Australia over carbon tax/A$ 0.065

Perhaps I don't understand Australian currency but should this not be A$0.65 on a litre not A$0.065. If this latter is correct I say big deal I pay £1.33 - up 25p in a year or so!

In response to some of the other opinions although I agree that putting oneself at a distict disadvantage by heavy taxation is not the way to tackle climate change, I must stress that there is no question about the reality of the phenomenon. Companies are sponsoring me to research ways to make renewable, potentially carbon neutral biogas more viable; this IS a real problem


text:
User talk:Mukesh.speed

-- 09:04, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mukesh.speed


text:
Comments:Pakistan: Nawab Akbar Bugti Killed in Baluchistan

Comments from feedback form - "Bugti was a dwonright traitor ..."
Bugti was a dwonright traitor who was playing in the hands of Indian RAW —220.101.44.112 (talk) 09:05, 28 February 2011 (UTC)


text: Comments:Jeff Gordon wins the 2011 Subway Fresh Fit 500


text: Talk:Jeff Gordon wins the 2011 Subway Fresh Fit 500


text:
User talk:Sallyobrown29

-- 09:24, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sallyobrown29


text:
Category:2011 Bahraini protests

ca:Categoria:Protestes a Bahrain del 2011

title: Category:2011 Bahraini protests


text:
User talk:Chawla.mohali

-- 09:34, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Chawla.mohali


text:
User talk:Chich7818

-- 09:37, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Chich7818


text:
User talk:Jadhavrs

-- 09:39, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jadhavrs


text:
User talk:Chale-alamout

-- 09:40, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Chale-alamout


text:
User talk:Adit iman

-- 10:01, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Adit iman


text:
User talk:Rchindi

-- 10:01, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rchindi


text:
User talk:Youtux

-- 10:36, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Youtux


text: User talk:94.202.110.128

title: User talk:94.202.110.128


text:
User talk:87.236.50.10

Welcome
Δεν δοδγε  t\c 10:41, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:87.236.50.10


text:
User talk:Tony.hampton.53

-- 10:45, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tony.hampton.53


text:
User talk:Dave abson

-- 10:46, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dave abson


text:
User talk:DawnChorus1990

-- 10:49, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:DawnChorus1990


text:
User talk:Leor klier

-- 10:51, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Leor klier


text:
User talk:Sachithru

-- 11:10, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sachithru


text:
User talk:Justin Ormont

-- 11:21, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Justin Ormont


text:
User talk:Gharr

-- 11:35, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gharr


text:
User talk:MSMEDITERRANEAN

-- 11:59, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:MSMEDITERRANEAN


text:
User talk:Ganesantrev

-- 12:28, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ganesantrev


text:
User talk:Fine-collections

-- 12:34, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Fine-collections


text:
User talk:Office de Tourisme Rouen vallée de Seine - Normandie

-- 13:02, 28 February 2011 (UTC)


text:
User talk:Binil Balakrishnan

-- 13:18, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Binil Balakrishnan


text:
User talk:Infatuation~enwikinews

-- 13:44, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Infatuation. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Infatuation~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:15, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:32, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Infatuation~enwikinews


text:
User talk:19michael1990

-- 13:47, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:19michael1990


text:
User talk:Werner100359

-- 13:49, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Werner100359


text:
User talk:Hoanguneti

-- 14:06, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hoanguneti


text:
User talk:Gnurfe

-- 14:06, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gnurfe


text:
User talk:DiH-blitzpcorp

-- 14:16, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:DiH-blitzpcorp


text:
User talk:Olisiejko

-- 14:20, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Olisiejko


text:
User talk:Carluchin

-- 14:21, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Carluchin


text:
User talk:Merryellen

-- 14:23, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Merryellen


text:
User talk:Leo'nel Orji

-- 14:25, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Leo'nel Orji


text:
User talk:Fzamith

-- 14:38, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Fzamith


text:
User talk:Stéfano Sepúlveda

-- 14:51, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Stéfano Sepúlveda


text:
User talk:Rbliven4

-- 15:15, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rbliven4


text:
User talk:Fabio.carpenedo

-- 15:20, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Fabio.carpenedo


text:
User talk:Said chablaoui

-- 15:21, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Said chablaoui


text:
User talk:Morton Shumway

-- 15:26, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Morton Shumway


text:
Thread:Comments:New Year’s Eve tornado slams northwest Arkansas, killing three/Comments from feedback form - "IT has so much info!"

IT has so much info!


text:
User talk:Pontspar

-- 15:37, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Pontspar


text:
User talk:Edevers

-- 15:39, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Edevers


text:
User talk:Ingridkafor

-- 15:42, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ingridkafor


text:
User talk:Hinatajr232

-- 15:47, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hinatajr232


text:
User talk:Igiolo

-- 16:22, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Igiolo


text:
User talk:Fenelita

-- 16:27, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Fenelita


text:
User talk:Nhoppy

-- 16:41, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nhoppy


text:
Thread:Comments:Egyptian man names daughter 'Facebook'/When she grows up...

I wonder what will happen when she joins Facebook?


text:
User talk:Venegoor28

-- 17:02, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Venegoor28


text:
User talk:Torkramey

-- 17:09, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Torkramey


text:
User talk:Catarnold83

-- 17:16, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Catarnold83


text:
User talk:Opukahaia808

-- 17:20, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Opukahaia808


text:
User talk:Reecea66

-- 17:21, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Reecea66


text:
User talk:Ugcobserver

-- 17:37, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ugcobserver


text:
User talk:Mb271404

-- 17:46, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mb271404


text:
Local government officials confiscate London ice cream made from human breast milk for health reasons

March 2, 2011

Local British councillors have reported that they have seized ice cream made from the that had been placed on sale in a shop located in London, England, United Kingdom. Officials cited concerns relating to health and safety.

A spokeswoman explained that two complaints made by members of the public were being replied to by the council. The Icecreamists, the marketing company involved with the dessert known as 'Baby Gaga', are fully co-operating with officials who are carrying out tests that are currently ongoing. According to Brian Connell, an individual from the council, "[s]elling foodstuffs made from another person's bodily fluids can lead to viruses being passed on and, in this case, potentially ."

A serving of the ice cream is valued at 14 (US$22.76, €16.49) and is provided in a. The item became available to purchase during the last week and quickly increased in popularity; within days, the first shipment was sold out.

The breast milk was donated by fifteen women who responded to an online advertisement located on a forum aimed at mothers. According to the company, all milk is screened for the "highest and safest" standards before it is and prepared for human consumption. It is then mixed with the of lemons and vanilla seed cases.

Matt O'Connor, who founded the Icecreamists, stated: "As far as we are aware there is no law prohibiting a business from selling breast milk ice cream". He claimed that "[i]f it's good enough for our children, it's good enough for the rest of us" and "[s]ome people will hear about it and go yuck - but actually it's pure organic, free-range and totally natural." Brian Connell, a member of the the Conservative Party in the UK, believes that "[a]s the local authority we will support small businesses and applaud innovative ideas wherever possible, but must protect the health of consumers."


text:
User talk:Jonatas.cpereira

-- 17:57, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jonatas.cpereira


text:
User talk:Gonfaloniere

-- 17:59, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gonfaloniere


text:
User talk:Ahmed Haseef

-- 18:04, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ahmed Haseef


text:
User talk:Najwa chakour

-- 18:07, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Najwa chakour


text:
User talk:Andipon

-- 18:08, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Andipon


text:
User talk:Franquita

-- 18:12, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Franquita


text:
User talk:Wikisushil

-- 18:14, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Wikisushil


text:
User talk:OBmerrt

-- 18:42, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:OBmerrt


text:
User talk:Iksa01

-- 18:43, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Iksa01


text:
Thread:Comments:Magnitude 7.0 earthquake hits New Zealand/Comments from feedback form - "It's ok.."

It's ok..


text:
User talk:Maliq34

-- 18:56, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Maliq34


text:
User talk:Toozhink

-- 18:58, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Toozhink


text:
User talk:Prior MGS

-- 19:05, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Prior MGS


text:
User talk:Mr R Taylor

-- 19:09, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mr R Taylor


text:
User talk:Aubinjohn

-- 19:20, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Aubinjohn


text:
User talk:John.swagger

-- 19:26, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:John.swagger


text:
User talk:Hilary1112

-- 19:34, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hilary1112


text:
User talk:Pushi lubana

-- 19:37, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Pushi lubana


text:
Thread:Comments:France calls on Libyan leader to step down/We Are Anonymous.

We are legion. We do not forgive. We do not forget. Expect US.


text:
User talk:Roger3592

-- 20:09, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Roger3592


text:
User talk:Cccadamhaklıbeylerccc

-- 20:58, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Cccadamhaklıbeylerccc


text:
User talk:Sumanah

-- 20:58, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sumanah


text:
User talk:Dcmundy

-- 21:05, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dcmundy


text:
User talk:John35

-- 21:12, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:John35


text:
User talk:TYelliot

-- 21:18, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:TYelliot


text:
User talk:Hushhush90210

-- 21:18, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hushhush90210


text:
User talk:Darafast978

-- 21:20, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Darafast978


text:
User talk:Ярон

-- 21:22, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ярон


text:
User talk:Keham

-- 21:40, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Keham


text:
User talk:Inbikidron

-- 21:42, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Inbikidron


text:
User talk:Jampotp

-- 21:53, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jampotp


text:
User talk:Itachisan125

-- 22:00, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Itachisan125


text:
User talk:Jerbear~enwikinews

-- 22:14, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Jerbear. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Jerbear~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:16, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:32, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jerbear~enwikinews


text:
User talk:Juan950

-- 22:18, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Juan950


text:
User talk:Ti0206

-- 22:27, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ti0206


text:
User talk:Michael Barkowski

-- 22:36, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Michael Barkowski


text:
User talk:Kittiesonfire5

-- 22:43, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kittiesonfire5


text:
User talk:Santabarbarabard

-- 22:43, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Santabarbarabard


text:
User talk:Kittiesonfire6

-- 22:43, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kittiesonfire6


text:
User talk:Kittiesonfire7

-- 22:44, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kittiesonfire7


text:
User talk:Espinozapaz1992

-- 22:46, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Espinozapaz1992


text:
User talk:Mikespot

-- 23:16, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mikespot


text:
User talk:Robnoyce

-- 23:37, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Robnoyce


text:
User talk:Monkeypi6

-- 23:47, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Monkeypi6


text:
User talk:Enfuabcadem

-- 00:06, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Enfuabcadem


text:
User talk:Omardejesuslabrunasosa

-- 00:19, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Omardejesuslabrunasosa


text:
User talk:Omarcmitchell

-- 00:23, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Omarcmitchell


text:
User talk:King-9

-- 00:29, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:King-9


text:
User talk:中村拓真

-- 00:37, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:中村拓真


text:
User talk:Vitor dirami

-- 01:17, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Vitor dirami


text:
User talk:Caterfee

-- 01:24, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Caterfee


text:
User talk:Jairod velalvarado

-- 02:15, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jairod velalvarado


text:
User talk:Dexter4414

-- 02:24, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dexter4414


text:
User talk:Adanies

-- 02:28, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Adanies


text:
User talk:Vatul

-- 02:44, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Vatul


text:
User talk:Pankajyelpale

-- 04:06, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Pankajyelpale


text:
User talk:Clearlyfakeusername

-- 04:09, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Clearlyfakeusername


text:
Thread:Comments:Australian town to change name to promote road safety/Comments from feedback form - "It would be good to include sp..."/reply

Yes, and if this is to be some sort of annual thing, then results might show benefit.


text:
User talk:Xmido

-- 04:46, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Xmido


text:
User talk:......羅

-- 05:09, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:......羅


text:
User talk:Jhonflog

-- 05:09, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jhonflog


text:
User talk:Shakilbahria

-- 05:17, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Shakilbahria


text:
User talk:44.magnum

-- 05:29, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:44.magnum


text:
User talk:Wchavarr741

-- 05:32, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Wchavarr741


text:
User talk:Pbalyoz

-- 06:12, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Pbalyoz


text:
User talk:Infowise

-- 06:13, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Infowise


text:
User talk:Mohammed Bitar

-- 06:14, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mohammed Bitar


text:
User talk:محمد الدعيمي

-- 07:04, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:محمد الدعيمي


text:
User talk:Search Nexus

-- 07:10, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Search Nexus


text:
User talk:Cdoto109

-- 07:56, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Cdoto109


text:
User talk:Mazzoka

-- 08:07, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mazzoka


text:
User talk:Gabriel.ferreira

-- 08:08, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gabriel.ferreira


text:
User talk:Evelyn beggy

-- 08:33, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Evelyn beggy


text:
User talk:Spreadhope

-- 08:48, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Spreadhope


text:
User talk:Cblc

-- 08:54, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Cblc


text:
User talk:Shihan07

-- 09:02, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Shihan07


text:
User talk:Thyfonologi

-- 09:07, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Thyfonologi


text:
User talk:Pichu13791

-- 09:13, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Pichu13791


text:
User talk:Weri20

-- 09:32, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Weri20


text:
Talk:Local government officials confiscate London ice cream made from human breast milk for health reasons

In my eyes, 'British Government' == Westminster; Westminster City Council is 'Local Government'. "Local representatives of the British government" sound like ambassadors — the UK Gov't didn't step in, the local authority did. There's a difference. — μ 09:38, 1 March 2011 (UTC) -
 * The sentence "To meet the requirements of blood donors, the milk is given a screening" doesn't make sense to me. Bawolff ☺☻ 01:40, 2 March 2011 (UTC)


text:
User talk:Microchip08/Archive/3

RFP
I see BarkingFish has nominated you for adminship. The nom is waiting for you to accept or decline, yonder. --Pi zero (talk) 22:58, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi Microchip! Just a heads-up, I've asked you a question at the RFA. Cheers, Tempodivalse [talk]  16:47, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

User:Microchip08/pseudodelete.js
Why is this page showing up in Category:Speedy deletion? --Pi zero (talk) 18:01, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Presumably because it's got written in there somewhere; I'll go and fix shortly. (If you're wondering what it is, by the way, User:Microchip08/Scripts). And if you're wanting to get onto IRC without too much fiddling and hassle, here's a temp. solution — μ 18:09, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The one time I made a push to get IRC sorted out once and for all, the puzzle on which I stopped, making a note to figure it out "next time" (this was months ago :-), was how to avoid publicly revealing my IP. --Pi zero (talk) 20:31, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Install an IRC client of your choice
 * Connect to irc://irc.freenode.net, to no channels
 * Register with NickServ, /msg NickServ help register
 * Either /join #freenode temporarily with your exposed IP and request an unaffiliated cloak* or:
 * Request a Wikimedia cloak
 * Wait for the cloak to be applied; then /join channels as normal.

 * Alternatively, you could connect via Tor. — μ 21:02, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Category:Ahmadiyya
Hi, It's not empty anymore.Peaceworld111 (talk) 16:20, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

 * I don't understand why you deleted the Category:Ahmadiyya from Indonesian president urged to respond to anti-Ahmadiyya violence. I have re-added the category to prevent speedy-deletion for now - so we can discuss.Peaceworld111 (talk) 16:30, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Wikinewsie
Hi, I know I am being a really big pain.. I understand most but what about the articles that have pasted the time they can no longer be edited? Thanks Chandlerjoeyross (talk) 22:18, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, you can't edit them, can you? — μ 22:35, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
 * This is what I mean, does it mean that those articles are not included within the Wikinewsie category or is their another way? Chandlerjoeyross (talk) 22:39, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Cr*p
You beaten me to it :-P Diego Grez return fire 18:47, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

MediaWiki:Recentchangestext
I'm curious. Looking at the of all that, why remove the fullurl? It seems to still work (thought I'm not entirely clear on why), but building an insecure link into such a basic page for people using the secure server — when it used to be server-relative — seems a surprising choice. --Pi zero (talk) 22:03, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
 * That was a complete accident. I rolled back my edits to the interface message, forgot to readd. — μ 22:13, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Note to self
Keep an eye on NHL Scoreboard — μ 13:15, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Portal:2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami
I don't remember exactly, but I think that portal was frozen as an archive news item. (We didn't have portals at that time, and the idea was to create a single central news article about the news event, which didn't quite work imo.) -  Amgine | t 05:10, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Hey there!
Lol, It seems that twitter it's a huge powerful tool. All sources used, contain some information that will help verify the facts. Thanks for the welcome. Saloca (talk) 15:36, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Portal:2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami
I don't remember exactly, but I think that portal was frozen as an archive news item. (We didn't have portals at that time, and the idea was to create a single central news article about the news event, which didn't quite work imo.) -  Amgine | t 05:10, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Hey there!
Lol, It seems that twitter it's a huge powerful tool. All sources used, contain some information that will help verify the facts. Thanks for the welcome. Saloca (talk) 15:36, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

My customised main page
Do you know how to edit the four boxes on my main page so that two of them are in two rows each? So far, I have only managed to get two boxes on one row with the boxes underneath placed one on top of the other, if you know what I mean. Can you please suggest what you can do to help? -- Rayboy8 ( my talk ) ( my contributions ) 23:17, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Protip: Split the sections into subpages, such as { /Intro}} to clear up the wikitext and make it easier to find the problem. — μ 23:24, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

gadget?
I'm wondering, why did you disable the progress-review gadget? --Pi zero (talk) 13:19, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I disabled it because it wasn't working for me, and it used to. Admittedly, I didn't check very much (so was probably a mistake), I assumed that it was incompatible with 1.17 — feel free to revert. — μ 13:21, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
 * It's working for me, now, producing a baleful red eye in the corner of each window.

 * Could you be overriding the default logo? As for example during the christmas season, when it didn't work because we had the logo with the hat on it.  --Pi zero (talk)

Thanks
I understand, thanks. I did not do this intentionally and think the issue stemmed from an edit conflict between JoshuaZ and I, as we were trying to merge two articles. Thank you for cleaning it up. Tyrol5 (talk) 23:27, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Danes overestimate their welfare
Regarding Danes overestimate their welfare, are you asking me to change the template? I don't understand what you are requesting me to do. Thanks, Mattisse (talk) 20:05, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Make sure the concerns are addressed. If they are, remove stale and abandoned from the article, and resub for review. Regards, — μ 20:40, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The concerns are "Procedural failure; article has and  tags on it — the concerns must be rectified before progressing to the  stage"? Now the article  is stale, since the recent sources (February 23) were added on February 25 and now it is February 26. Hopeless. Mattisse (talk) 20:54, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Voodoo sex ritual leaves woman dead -So you are saying that I can edit the article?
So you are saying that I can edit the article? I will not be punished as "disruptive" if I do? Mattisse (talk) 21:10, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Yep. Be aware of the following points: all edits will be reviewed by a reviewer, the same way they would had the article not been published; edits to articles older than 24 hours are frowned upon; most edits are generally (but not by policy, unless I am mistaken) made during develop and review, and not publish — constructive edits are, by definition, not disruptive. Go ahead! — μ 21:24, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Indian Railways in the Red
It was my first story and I'm sorry for not getting it right. Now I'm reading articles on 'How to write well on Wikinews' and how others present their stories. I just want to ask you to delete the Indian Railways in the Red story because it's of no use now.

Thank You.

Sin un nomine (talk) 18:22, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Fixing w links
Noticed you wrote in an edit summary "[did you know? There's a gadget to help you spot these :P]". I'm not sure whether that question was for me, but just in case it was — I did notice the gadget, use it, and love it. But I often leave unfixed local links in an article. My original purpose in creating w was only secondarily to catch wp links that could be made local. Primarily it was as a bookkeeping device for categorization: a w that links locally is an indicator that somebody should give careful consideration to whether or not to add the article to some category(-ies), associated with that link. Maybe it should, maybe it shouldn't; but by linking with w one can defer that decision without losing track of it. I have, rarely, been known to change a local link in the archives to use w, for later scrutiny (years later, if that's how long it takes; why not?). --Pi zero (talk) 14:38, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, you did name the category "fixable" local links (not that it matters much). A problem (which may not be a problem) is that the fixable category is going to grow and grow: a category with 200+ pages is nigh unmanageable — my reasoning for fixing the links was to keep that category down as much as I could whilst it was still <50. So, is the maxim "remove the w if you add a category; keep it if you aren't sure"? Years later is fine, but perhaps our successors won't appreciate us leaving mammoth tasks for them. In short, I feel we should fix as we go along. Thanks for pointing out the ulterior motive of w: it's not something I realised — if it's OK with you, I'll continue to remove calls to w that point to local links, but add categories where required. Feel free to veto if I'm misunderstanding. — μ 16:04, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

 * Good, excellent point about "fixable"; it needs to be called something different. I'm not sure "categorizable" is quite right, as it might move someone to uncritically add every such article to the associated category, and "processable" seems too vague.  Hm.

 * Those who came before have already left us with an utterly mind-blowingly vast task, to clean up the categorization/linking of the archives. Note, it's not just the number of links involved that makes it so vast (there may be only about one or two hundred thousand of them), it's the intelligent thought that has to be put into each article, deciding where links should be added or unlinked, and how each of them relates the article to various categories that do, or might, exist.  It isn't, imo, always possible to know when one first looks at an article how best to deal with categorization related to every one of its local links.

 * It also seems to me impossible to complete each one of the innumerable subtasks involved if one allows oneself to be drawn off endlessly into other subtasks at the same time. Nothing ever gets finished, and after a while nothing ever gets started.  The only way to get one subtask done is to not be tempted into straying off the path.  I've found it's just possible to fit in one secondary task (that of adding w) alongside whatever I'm working on; more, and everything would grind to a halt.

 * So as I see it, the category soon-to-be-formerly-known-as-"fixable" isn't a matter of bequeathing a mammoth task to the future instead of not doing so; it's a matter of bequeathing a mammoth but measurable task to the future instead of bequeathing the same vast and immeasurable task that we inherited. --Pi zero (talk) 18:22, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Wacky edits
Hi. When I added "notcategory=Internet" to the S&T feed, it turned blank. That's why I just traded banned cats. When I look at your change in "edit", it looks blank too. Do I need a new pair of WackyGlasses?! ;-) RichardF 14:30, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
 * So it is. No idea what's happening there. — μ 17:03, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Al Jazeera cameraman murdered in eastern Libya
I tried  titling it "shot dead" and "killed" instead of "murdered" but the page move would not let me do it. Mattisse (talk) 15:10, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

 * I am confused. I tried to follow the directions on Talk:Al Jazeera cameraman dies in eastern Libya and directions to merge with another article. But article move rejected most titles. And I am not sure what has happened now! Mattisse (talk) 15:43, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The software didn't accept the page move because there was another page with the same name that interfered with the rename: Al Jazeera cameraman killed in eastern Libya. In order to "merge" the articles, you should simply expand the existing article with content found in your article. Tempodivalse [talk]  15:52, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I had moved my material and sources to the article. But I wanted to get rid of the title Qatari cameraman shot dead in Libya as misleading, and Qatari is not an important fact in the article. I changed the title successfully but then tried adding italics to Al Jazeera in the title which screwed everything up. I tried "murdered" in the title but the reviewer thought that was POV. Anyway, I think it is all straightened out now! (I will be more careful in the future.) Mattisse (talk) 16:25, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Category name change
I renamed the fixable category to Category:Pages with categorizable local links. --Pi zero (talk) 18:40, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Sounds a lot better; good idea. — μ 22:02, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Microchip08/Archive/3


text:
User talk:Danuta kafar

-- 09:43, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Danuta kafar


text:
User talk:Mipody

-- 09:44, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mipody


text:
User talk:Corpcommsgoods

-- 09:51, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Corpcommsgoods


text:
User talk:Yaviva

-- 10:15, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Yaviva


text:
Thread:Comments:France calls on Libyan leader to step down/We Are Anonymous./reply

this kind of talk to the current world should not be excersiced. we ned beter views for the betternment of our great grand fathers


text:
User talk:Clicken

-- 10:50, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Clicken


text:
User talk:M-JayX

-- 10:54, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:M-JayX


text:
User talk:Joshuarmaglapuz

-- 11:01, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Joshuarmaglapuz


text:
User talk:Rachitm85

-- 11:07, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rachitm85


text:
User talk:Theloansharks

-- 11:17, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Theloansharks


text:
User talk:Khalouss-ky

-- 11:25, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Khalouss-ky


text:
User talk:Jhonmorinho

-- 11:45, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jhonmorinho


text:
User talk:Madeinjabon

-- 11:59, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Madeinjabon


text:
User talk:BenZL43

-- 12:01, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:BenZL43


text:
User talk:Ranjitkct

-- 12:10, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ranjitkct


text:
User talk:Andriandwell

-- 12:27, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Andriandwell


text:
User talk:Evik Dwi Priagung

-- 12:47, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Evik Dwi Priagung


text:
User talk:Archibald Leitch

-- 13:12, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Archibald Leitch


text:
User talk:زهرالورد

-- 13:14, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:زهرالورد


text:
User talk:KahunaNews

-- 13:21, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:KahunaNews


text:
User talk:Anaitatway

-- 13:49, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Anaitatway


text:
User talk:Naa2000

-- 13:53, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Naa2000


text:
User talk:Collect

-- 14:17, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Collect


text:
User talk:Distel82

-- 14:22, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Distel82


text:
User talk:Fiftyshades

-- 14:28, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Fiftyshades


text:
User talk:Hegemerethe,

-- 14:43, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hegemerethe,


text:
User talk:Eli Elia

-- 14:57, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Eli Elia


text:
User talk:Himetv

-- 14:58, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Himetv


text:
User talk:Babygirl123

-- 14:59, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Babygirl123


text:
User talk:Angelogutierrez

-- 15:02, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Angelogutierrez


text:
User talk:DLangrish

-- 15:03, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:DLangrish


text:
User talk:Cc123987

-- 15:19, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Cc123987


text:
User talk:Kittiesonfire10

-- 15:49, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kittiesonfire10


text:
User talk:Kittiesonfire11

-- 15:50, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kittiesonfire11


text:
User talk:Kittiesonfire12

-- 15:50, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kittiesonfire12


text:
User talk:Kittiesonfire13

-- 15:51, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kittiesonfire13


text:
User talk:Kittiesonfire14

-- 15:51, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kittiesonfire14


text:
User talk:Kittiesonfire15

-- 15:52, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kittiesonfire15


text:
User talk:Zoonbin

-- 15:59, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Zoonbin