text:
User talk:Arta.arta

-- 14:06, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Arta.arta


text:
User talk:Hossy1992

-- 14:18, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: User talk:Hossy1992


text:
User talk:Pmtss

-- 14:28, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Pmtss


text:
User talk:Hutchinson Daniel

-- 14:45, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hutchinson Daniel


text:
User talk:AmericanZygote

-- 14:53, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:AmericanZygote


text:
User talk:SocialAlex

-- 14:58, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:SocialAlex


text:
User talk:Navarroaxel

-- 15:01, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Navarroaxel


text:
Thread:Comments:Anti-abortion activist Bernard Nathanson dies aged 84/Comments from feedback form - "looks like he aborted."/reply (4)

Lives of great men all remind us We can make our lives sublime, And departing leave behind us Footprints on the sands of time... --Longfellow

I mourn the quiet loss of this great man. His integrity, from where I stand, appears intact. I cannot say as much for my snide fellow commenters above.


text:
User talk:Stevejhgla

-- 15:11, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Stevejhgla


text:
User talk:Cartoonduck

-- 15:12, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Cartoonduck


text:
User talk:Aridann

-- 15:14, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Aridann


text:
User talk:Fann8172

-- 15:16, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Fann8172


text:
User talk:Nsgaeverine

-- 15:28, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nsgaeverine


text:
Thread:Comments:New York Times to start charging for access to web news/Good riddance!/reply (3)

I agree. Less commercialised news sites are important nowadays, what with all the newspapers being tabloid-like in some way. Kayau (talk · contribs) 15:33, 18 March 2011 (UTC)


text:
User talk:Regis Hickey

-- 15:36, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Regis Hickey


text:
User talk:Alexandra400

-- 15:38, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Alexandra400


text:
User talk:Avien77

-- 15:44, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Avien77


text:
User talk:JK~enwikinews

-- 15:54, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called JK. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name JK~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:19, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:32, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:JK~enwikinews


text:
User talk:SevenCPA

-- 16:01, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:SevenCPA


text:
User talk:Bronte matthews

-- 16:05, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bronte matthews


text:
User talk:Bernard100

-- 16:06, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bernard100


text: Talk:British electronica band Faithless to separate


text: Comments:British electronica band Faithless to separate


text:
User talk:Gtaco

-- 16:24, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gtaco


text:
User talk:Drakcelona

-- 16:26, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Drakcelona


text:
User talk:Victolymp

-- 16:32, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Victolymp


text:
Japan raises severity level of crisis; efforts to cool damaged nuclear power plant continue

March 18, 2011

As the nuclear crisis in Japan's crippled appears to worsen,  raised their assessment of its severity from  to  on the 7-level, the same rating given the 1979  crisis. Japan's Prime Minister,, said bluntly that the situation at the nuclear power plant was "very grave". Weather forecasts indicate changing winds may begin moving radiation closer to Tokyo by March 30.

Efforts thus far to cool  in the  reactors and the  spent-fuel pools has produced little if any success, contends United States government officials.

Engineers are working frantically to connect electrical power to two reactors in the plant, as well as to restart the cooling systems and prevent overheating of. stated that it hopes to reconnect a power line needed to restart water pumps to the No. 1 and No. 2 reactors by Saturday morning. However, a official cautioned  that if the water pumps were damaged by the tsunami, they could fail to restart.

The extent of the damage to the plant's reactors is still unclear. Japanese officials have concentrated on cooling spent fuel rods in  Reactor No. 3's. On Friday, however, steam was seen rising from Reactor No. 2., where an explosion occurred on Tuesday. Additionally, engineers said on Thursday that the steel lining of the storage pool at Reactor No. 4 and its concrete base seemed damaged, as attempts to refill the pool with water became increasingly difficult.

In a briefing on Friday, Philippe Jamet, a commissioner at France's nuclear regulator, said, "We must avoid being overly optimistic. This will likely take human intervention like going into control rooms to reconnect valves."


text:
User talk:T-piston

-- 16:33, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:T-piston


text:
User talk:Xx-mechapunkygiirl-xx

-- 16:36, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Xx-mechapunkygiirl-xx


text:
User talk:Franco gd

-- 16:41, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Franco gd


text:
User talk:Olsi

-- 16:41, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Olsi


text:
User talk:Abdullahi47

-- 16:46, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Abdullahi47


text:
Thread:Comments:Japanese stocks continue to fall after earthquake/Comments from feedback form - "All information should be comp..."

All information should be completed a at particular point or topic.


text:
User talk:MagulBot

-- 17:01, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:MagulBot


text:
Thread:Comments:Power line to Japanese nuclear plant completed/Older Reactor technology/reply

And why do they need an external power line in the first place? I'm sure enough of the reactors are still working in some capacity that they would be able to deliver power to their own cooling systems. My dad didn't even have a PHD in physics and he was able to point this out from his short time working with nuclear reactors. Perhaps the reactors are already too far gone for them to consider the easy way? 66.154.183.15 (talk) 17:02, 18 March 2011 (UTC)


text:
User talk:Aydin1884

-- 17:42, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Aydin1884


text:
User talk:RikuRuiseart

-- 18:19, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:RikuRuiseart


text:
User talk:Labeloccurence

-- 18:36, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Labeloccurence


text:
User talk:Rodrigopereira

-- 18:43, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rodrigopereira


text:
User talk:Olavopedia

-- 19:09, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Olavopedia


text:
User talk:Mezawadzki

-- 19:10, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mezawadzki


text:
User talk:ImjaDima

-- 19:10, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:ImjaDima


text:
User talk:Schliff

-- 19:20, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Schliff


text:
User talk:Joseignacio49

-- 19:26, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Joseignacio49


text:
User talk:Igorfedorak

-- 19:31, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Igorfedorak


text:
Wikinews:Water cooler/technical/archives/2011/March

MediaWiki update stuff
Please update MediaWiki:Gadget-UTCLiveClock.js with the enwiki update, due to the MediaWiki update.  — fetch · comms  19:06, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Every page of Hungarian Wikinews appears as a blank one. You can make your browser to render them correctly by hitting the back button once, so I think this is because the addresses are truncated automatically, losing the very last character. This problem occurs on the main page too. Our toolbox (the one with you can insert special characters while editing a page) also stopped working. My best guess is that this problem derives from the latest update, but I am not sure. Could you check it, please? - Xbspiro (talk) 20:16, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Looks like its been fixed. Probably caused by using document.write in a js file. Bawolff ☺☻ 19:11, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
 * It got fixed on Wednesday, last week. There were several instances of using document.write on HUWN; we replaced them after we got a suggestion to do so on another forum. Thx anyway. - Xbspiro (talk) 13:27, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Semi-protect Comments:
Is it possible to protect [create=autoconfirmed] all pages in the Comments namespace? Doing so would no doubt stop creations of comments pages of unpublished articles, as all pages should be created by reviewers only. (Not sure what the deal with old articles without comments would be, though) — μ 00:23, 24 February 2011 (UTC) 00:23, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I would oppose this measure. What is the trouble with people commenting on unpublished articles? If the article is later published, then there should be no problem; if it's instead deleted, just delete the comments along with it (like we do to talk pages). Besides, there is also the problem of IPs not being able to comment on old, pre-LQT published articles if this is done. Tempodivalse [talk]  15:58, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I tend to agree with Tempo. I don't really see an issue with anons commenting on a yet to be published article. Bawolff ☺☻ 18:18, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
 * There are technical problems. For as long as MW does not correctly associate comments pages with articles, they cannot be automatically moved as with talk pages at the same time as an article. Developing pages may expect multiple moves, leaving disassociated comments pages. The other problem is that EzPR is required to create them properly; or, alternatively, they must be set up manually in advance. Comments pages created early by anons invariable do not use LQT and this isn't easily fixable; much to my annoyance, the only practical solution at-present is to remove comments where LQT hasn't been used but should have. LQT fails to support importation of misplaced comments. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 18:24, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

 * In fairness, there is also a plausible content-related rationale for not opening discussion on an article until it's published: prior to publication, the content is unscreened (so it's like discussing a blog entry, which isn't a valid use of Wikinews) and unfixed (so discussion may be about something different from what is later published).

 * On an unrelated —technical— note, it would be nice if we could "simply" rewire the Haveyoursay template(s) to not offer a redlink for pre-publication articles. The snag being, that's easy to do if one wants to suppress all redlinks, but not if one wants to show the redlink anyway for archived articles.  --Pi zero (talk) 23:17, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

 * Note, we do have a js hack to automatically move the comment pages. It sounds like a better fix to the problem would be to make comment namespace use lqt by default (which i'm pretty sure is possible) instead of requiring the . That way not currently created comment pages would act as if they had lqt. Bawolff ☺☻ 00:15, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

 * At least half the Comments contributions pre-publication are to utterly useless, or trolling by people who've created something useless in Main NS. A semi-protect until EZPR creates the valid comments page would be nice, but may be impractical; what of reviewers who are not administrators? --Brian McNeil / talk 06:47, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Judging by a simple userspace test I just carried out, [create=autoconfirmed] does not [edit=autoconfirmed] created pages. I don't see why reviewers not being administrators has anything to do with it: if a blanket restriction, akin to the MediaWiki namespace, of edit=autoconfirmed, move=all, create=autoconfirmed, was implemented, all would be well (although, I assume, one might have to create any comments pages of the archives that are yet to exist. (A better option would be to redir a user to talkspace until the page is created, unless forced by &redirect=no, but I doubt that's worth the time and effort) — μ 09:35, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Not sure if that came out quite right. I'd have thought the only change wanted would be create=autoconfirmed for comments space; presumably we don't want to prevent IPs from commenting once the comments page exists.  --Pi zero (talk) 12:06, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Er, create=autoconfirmed edit=all. — μ 14:17, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

 * No way, most people who use the comments page are IPs and this would decrease activity in that sense. It's simple, delete the comments pages they create (for unpublished articles) and problem solved. --Diego Grez return fire 15:12, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Name me a recently published article that has an associated comments page created by an anonymous editor. To reiterate, Comments: pages are only ever created by reviewers. Any comments page created by an IP was created before publication, and as such is deleted. I am proposing a restriction on creation, not editing: IPs will still be able to post messages, but they will have to wait for someone to "open" the forum (which is automatically done on publication by EPR) before doing so. — μ 17:07, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Interface tweak
I've just edited MediaWiki:Revreview-check-flag-u to try and tidy the review interface marginally: compare a new mainspace article with a a metaspace page. — μ 18:58, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I've also prevented the WN:PROD deletion reasons appearing in the dropdown for non-namespace articles, and the disassociated comments page from appearing on non-comments pages. I'd like to also prevent the abandoned reason from appearing if there are no pages in the Abandoned category (to prevent overzealous deleting without fair warning). Thought I'd better seek consensus for that one though (and I'm not sure if PAGESINCAT is cached or not). — μ 20:47, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
 * PAGESINCAT is cached in the category table, but its updated each time things added/deleted from category, so probably work. However, personally i'd think it'd be kind of confusing for the menu to change in such a fashion (Sometimes the entry is there, sometimes it isn't, without it being clear why). Bawolff ☺☻

Ambox type=serious appears in blue
ambox has been appearing in blue when the |type= parameter is set to serious. Why is this? Has something ahppened to the CSS? More importantly, how do we make it red again? See delete for an example. Δεν δοδγε  t\c 22:10, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I think is a likely culprit but haven't really checked. Is all that css really needed? Seems like a lot of extra fluff we don't use. (Remember more css = longer loading time. Not very much longer, but we still shouldn't put unneeded stuff in there just 'cause). Bawolff ☺☻ 22:18, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Blocking user pages from Wikipedia news feeds
How do I block user pages from showing up on Wikipedia news feeds, e.g., User:Mono/Sandbox at Portal:United States/Wikipedia? -- RichardF 17:33, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

 * ✅ - it was a specific problem with that page. Only published articles should have Publish in them, and, in turn, therefore only published articles should be in Category:Published. The news feed above (as with all these news feeds) relies on the published category to prevent stuff like that going through to Wikipedia. There may be a way to limit it to sighted articles, like what we do with the Main Page, but if there is I don't know what - I'm not technical in the least. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 17:41, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks! You're "technical" enough for me! :-)  RichardF 17:59, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
 * There are several DPL qualifiers that such feeds should always use:

category=published notcategory=No publish notcategory=disputed stablepages=only namespace=0
 * Cf. Topic cat. --Pi zero (talk) 18:27, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
 * We should perhaps put this all in a template for Wikipedia users (Something like DPL) Bawolff ☺☻ 22:48, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

All of the above qualifier were included. For some reason, "namespace=0" didn't keep out the user page, which I thought it should. - RichardF 02:32, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Actually, no. I added most of those qualifiers (all but the first) just before I made the above comment, so when you observed the problem they weren't in place.  My bad for not saying that in my comment.  Sorry for the confusion.  --Pi zero (talk) 12:22, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Ahhh, now I get it! I was thinking of when you added those qualifiers to Portal:Science and technology/Wikipedia. Thanks! -- RichardF 15:32, 20 March 2011 (UTC)


text:
Thread:Comments:Honey bee decline spreading globally/Dr.Who?

Saw this article and thought of that episode of Dr.Who when he kept wondering where all the bees were.


text:
User talk:RyanMartin92

-- 19:59, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:RyanMartin92


text:
United Nations says Ivory Coast shelling may be 'war crime'

March 18, 2011

After 25 people were killed Thursday by shells fired into the city of Abidjan in the Ivory Coast, the United Nations has issued a statement condemning the incident.

The shelling on Thursday resulted in around a hundred casualties, 25 of which were deaths. At least six shells were reportedly fired from military barracks into the district of, a region that supports Alassane Ouattara, the internationally recognized president of the Ivory Coast after elections in late 2010.

According to the UN, forces loyal to Laurent Gbagbo, who also claims to have won the election, were responsible for the shelling, though Gbagbo's supporters deny this.

The UN said that the incident was an act that "perpetrated against civilians, could constitute a crime against humanity." Secretary General said that the UN will "continue to take the necessary steps to protect the civilian population" in the country.

A spokesperson for Gbagbo, Ahoua Don Mello, however, denied responsibility for the shelling, claiming that the UN allegations were part of a "conspiracy" with Ouattara and France, the Ivory Coast's former colonial ruler, that would result in the removal of Gbagbo from power.

France also condemned the shelling, saying it was "deliberate massacre of civilians," and requested that the impose sanctions against Gbagbo and his allies.

Unrest since the presidential election is estimated to have killed 410 people and caused 450,000 people to leave their homes.


text:
Part of California highway near Big Sur falls into the sea

March 19, 2011 A 40-foot section of scenic about 12 miles south of, California crumbled into the  on Wednesday, preventing access to the popular tourist area of   from the north.

The collapse of the southbound lane of the two-lane highway, also known as the, follows several days of rain. The soil under the northbound lane is also in danger of giving way. Drivers heading north were blocked at the ; the rest of the road has been closed to traffic indefinitely. A long closure is expected to hurt the tourist business upon which Big Sur and and the tiny surrounding communities depend.

The  (CHP) said no one was injured.

The section that collapsed is on a curve south of the, where the highway clings to  the scenic , and near the Bixby Creek Bridge,  one of the "iconic" s that make this stretch of the highway with its dramatic vistas such a well-known scenic drive.

The cause of the collapse was not apparent as the road surface looked new, and no seeping water was visible. "It's basically just nature," a CHP officer said.

With Highway 1 closed, drivers wishing to access Big Sur from the north could go inland on  and pass through  the. To return to the coast drivers must pass over a steep, winding mountainous road. This route adds at least an hour to the journey.


text:
User talk:Psychiatrick

-- 20:17, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Psychiatrick


text:
User talk:Holiii

-- 20:26, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Holiii


text:
User talk:Newyorkcity1954

-- 20:32, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Newyorkcity1954


text: Talk:Japan raises severity level of crisis; efforts to cool damaged nuclear power plant continue


text: Comments:Japan raises severity level of crisis; efforts to cool damaged nuclear power plant continue


text: Talk:South African serial killer guilty of nineteen rapes, sixteen murders


text: Comments:South African serial killer guilty of nineteen rapes, sixteen murders


text:
User talk:Masada2011

-- 20:57, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Masada2011


text:
45 killed after Yemen protesters fired upon

March 19, 2011

45 people have been killed in Yemen after gunmen fired on protesters in the city of Sana'a. Several hundred more were injured.

The origins of the gunmen are not known for certain, but it is believed that both government security forces and civilian supporters of the government are responsible.

The shootings occurred shortly after midday prayers when protesters began moving towards a burning car. According to witnesses, several warning shots were fired by security forces before they fired on protesters, soon joined by gunmen on the tops of buildings.

President Ali Abdullah Saleh, however, has denied that the government is responsible for the deaths. He said that "[w]hat happened today was very regrettable, the death of our children." He also ordered a state of emergency, which would ban civilians from bearing weapons, to be declared.

One opposition leader termed the incident a "massacre," and called it "part of a criminal plan to kill off the protesters, and the president and his relatives are responsible for the bloodshed in Yemen today." Another said the events have caused there to be "no longer any possibility of mutual understanding" between the opposition and government.

Tourism Minister resigned in protest after the killings. Another prominent ruling-party member, Mohammed al-Qadhi, said "[w]e condemn these crimes against humanity." He had already resigned last week. "Even if it's plainclothes men firing on the protesters it is still the government's responsibility to protect them."


text:
User talk:Deadagain33

-- 21:42, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Deadagain33


text:
BBC DJ duo break radio record

March 19, 2011

and have broken a  by hosting a marathon programme on UK national station. The aim was to raise money for British charity.

The programme started at 0630 on Wednesday, being broadcasting live on the station's website and an interactive red button service available via digital television. On Thursday, Chris and Dave managed to surpass the record for the longest continuous broadcast by a presenter on BBC Radio 1. The record had been previously held by, who had achieved thirty-seven hours in 1999.

Moyles and Comedy Dave continued to broadcast on the station and subsequently overtook the "Radio DJ Endurance Marathon (Team)" Guinness World Record at 0830 UTC yesterday. At this stage, Moyles announced on-air "we're gonna do another two hours. Why? I have absolutely no idea." A Guinness World Record certificate was presented to Moyles and Vitty by British musician of. The show ended at 1030 UTC yesterday after fifty-two hours.

The total donated by listeners was 2,406,648. (3,906,711, 2,754,697).

Moyles said of his record "[w]e’ve been overwhelmed by the support we’ve received from our listeners. It’s been a rollercoaster ride of fun, laughs, tears and downright silliness. Now I’m off for a massive sleep!" Dave Vitty explained that "[w]e're both losing our voices and we’ve literally limped through the last few hours to the finish line but it’s all been worth it when we saw that final figure! Our listeners are incredible."

BBC Radio 1 Controller is "deeply proud of what they have achieved on many fronts – the amazing total raised, brilliant, high quality radio broadcasting throughout and some of the funniest and most inventive TV I’ve seen. I’ve also been knocked out by everyone’s support including the extraordinary generosity of Radio 1's audience; I want to thank them on behalf of Comic Relief and the BBC."

title: BBC DJ duo break radio record


text:
User talk:Radioactiive

-- 22:01, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Radioactiive


text: Talk:United Nations says Ivory Coast shelling may be 'war crime'


text: Comments:United Nations says Ivory Coast shelling may be 'war crime'


text:
User:Dendodge/Correction

For example:

Or:

title: User:Dendodge/Correction


text:
User talk:Jhorshe

-- 22:05, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jhorshe


text:
User talk:L0ngpar1sh

-- 22:34, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:L0ngpar1sh


text:
User talk:Panellines

-- 22:36, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Panellines


text:
User talk:Sanmedi27

-- 22:41, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sanmedi27


text:
Thread:Comments:Local government officials confiscate London ice cream made from human breast milk for health reasons/No breast milk for adults!/reply (3)

I see nothing wrong with this. YUCKK!! don't eat chocolate...its made from HORRIBLE UNNATURAL MILK!!


text:
User talk:Gf uip

-- 22:46, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gf uip


text:
User talk:Maddiestuff

-- 22:51, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Maddiestuff


text:
UN carries out first review of US human rights record

March 19, 2011

The United Nations has completed its first ever assessment of the United States human rights record, which began last November. They made 228 recommendations for improvements. On Friday, the U.S. accepted about 174 of these, agreeing to such recommendations as the humane treatment of terror suspects and repudiation of torture, but rejected the recommendation to drop the death penalty.

The, , listed nine core areas in which the U.S. agreed to make improvements, including civil rights, immigration,  and the humane treatment of suspects held at  Guantanamo Bay detention camp. Koh said President Obama agreed to push for ratification of conditions under the  and to add protections for international armed conflict detainees. Koh refused to drop the death penalty as many European countries requested, arguing that it was legal under international law.

Some nations wanted the U.S. to reduce, prevent , and ratify international treaties protecting the rights of women and children. China and Russia wanted Guantanamo to be shut down. Cuba, Iran and Venezuela said the U.S. was ignoring too many recommendations.

The Obama administration joined the 47-nation two years ago, allowing for increased international scrutiny. This is the first time the five-year-old council has reviewed the U.S. record of human rights. Nations are held accountable to make the improvements in the recommendations that they agree to.

In criticism of the U.S., the director of the American Civil Liberties Union's human rights program, Jamil Dakwar, noted that the U.S., unlike 100 other countries, lacks an independent human rights monitoring commission.


text:
Thread:Comments:UK animal welfare group prosecutes woman who threw cat into bin/Disgusting/reply

they should put the bloody bitch in prison for a few years and let her think about it.


text:
User talk:Kai Fr

-- 23:11, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kai Fr


text:
User talk:66.240.31.42

Hey, how does it come,the quotes begin with a letter within the square brackets? Can sombody explain. "[w]e don't really know in detail what's happening. We hear conflicting reports.",in this quote for instance,also in the other,same case.

title: User talk:66.240.31.42


text:
User talk:Batotmartins

-- 23:38, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Batotmartins


text:
User talk:Beg4silence

-- 23:59, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Beg4silence


text:
User talk:Retropolis1

-- 00:00, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Retropolis1


text:
Comments:Chris Moyles breaks record for longest running breakfast show on BBC Radio 1

Well done to Chris Moyles for this achievement. But in fairness, it should be pointed out that the record was broken by BOTH Moyles and comedian Dave Vitty


text:
User talk:Viavillecinque

-- 00:11, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Viavillecinque


text:
User talk:Fancy-cats-are-happy-cats

-- 00:20, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Fancy-cats-are-happy-cats


text:
User talk:08OceanBeach SD

-- 00:22, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:08OceanBeach SD


text:
User talk:Beto 3269

-- 00:26, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Beto 3269


text:
User talk:Abo can

-- 00:36, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Abo can


text:
User:BarkingFish/monobook.js

$(function { try { //lqt_header_content lqt-talkpage-header lqt-new-thread lqt-edit-form lqt_toc if (!document.getElementById('commentary-header-lqt')) return; var b = document.getElementById('bodyContent'); b.className += ' no-lqt'; var ap = b.getElementsByTagName('h2')[1] if (!ap) return var contents = b.getElementsByTagName('h2')[0]; var container = document.createElement('div'); container.id = 'lqt-tools-crap'; var toc = getElementsByClassName(b, 'table', 'lqt_toc'); if (toc.length === 0) return; //no comments, doesn't really work. container.appendChild(getElementsByClassName(b, 'div', 'lqt-talkpage-header')[0]); container.appendChild(getElementsByClassName(b, 'div', 'lqt-new-thread')[0]); container.appendChild(contents); container.appendChild(toc[0]); ap.parentNode.insertBefore(container, ap); container.style.display = 'none'; var li = document.createElement('li'); li.innerHTML = '[Show/hide LQT tools↓]'; getElementsByClassName(b, 'ul', 'lqt_header_commands')[0].appendChild(li); //to give an edit link (since we're hiding reply) var b= document.getElementById('bodyContent'); var a = getElementsByClassName(b, 'ul', 'lqt_threadlevel_commands'); var li, d; for (var i = 0; i < a.length; i++) { li = document.createElement('li'); d = document.createElement('a'); d.appendChild(document.createTextNode('Reply/Edit')); d.href= getElementsByClassName(a[i].nextSibling, 'li', 'lqt-command-link')[0].getElementsByTagName('a')[0].href; li.appendChild(d); a[i].appendChild(li); } } catch (e) {} }); function toggleLQTTools { var l = document.getElementById('lqt-tools-crap'); var b = document.getElementById('bodyContent'); if (b.className.indexOf('no-lqt') !== -1) { b.className = b.className.replace(/\s?no-lqt/, ''); } else { b.className += ' no-lqt'; } if (l.style.display === 'none') l.style.display = 'block'; else l.style.display = 'none'; return (void 0); }

jQuery('span.mw-usertoollinks a[title^=Special:Block]').text('Apply Cluebat');

title: User:BarkingFish/monobook.js


text:
Talk:Part of California highway near Big Sur falls into the sea

Aside from rain...
Just asking, is this an area previously vulnerable to collapse even before the recent rains? And is there expected to be further erosion and if so, what preventive measures might be put in place as a result. Suggestions for further info. Thanks, 110.32.230.87 (talk) 07:53, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

 * It's vulnerable to landslides from the mountains falling over the road during rainy season and blocking it, but I have never heard of a portion of the highway collapsing before. Mattisse (talk) 15:22, 19 March 2011 (UTC)


text: Comments:Part of California highway near Big Sur falls into the sea


text:
User talk:Serpentspine

-- 01:15, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Serpentspine


text:
User talk:Posidon8

-- 01:20, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Posidon8


text:
User talk:InterstellarCuriosity

-- 01:28, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:InterstellarCuriosity


text:
User talk:Delfin1571

-- 01:29, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Delfin1571


text:
User talk:Slushtastic

-- 01:54, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Slushtastic


text:
Thread:Comments:ITV fined A$3000 for cruelty to rat on "I'm A Celebrity...Get Me Out Of Here!"/BANNED IN BRITAIN/reply

banned in Britain?...GOOD SHOW!! Why can't stupid people leave animals alone.


text:
Thread:Comments:Whaling activist arrested by Japan/NO SYMPATHY

Suddenly I feel zilch sympathy for the Japanese...in fact, praying for another tsunami.


text:
Thread:Comments:In pictures: Japan earthquake and tsunami/Comments from feedback form - "There was not much information..."

There was not much information to evaluate, I believe this came up to soon


text:
User talk:H.C. Greven

-- 02:23, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:H.C. Greven


text:
Thread:Comments:Conflicting reports, mounting fear, over Japanese nuclear disaster/Comments from feedback form - "the first time I looked at thi..."

the first time I looked at this material, either very little was shown or I didn't know how to see the pictures until this time


text:
Thread:Comments:ITV fined A$3000 for cruelty to rat on "I'm A Celebrity...Get Me Out Of Here!"/Really?/reply (17)

Right - let me clear some stuff up. - The animal that was killed, an Australian Jungle Rat, is a native Australian Species, thus protected under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals act*. The chef who dispatched the animal, Gino D'Acampo, has some considerable knowledge of slaughter, but I would imagine he doesn't deal with rats everyday.

The death of the animal took longer than is permitted under New South Wales' Animal Welfare Legislation (90 seconds according to the Australian RSPCA), and the slaughter also took place without an approved method of stunning being applied, leading to the charges of cruelty against D'Acampo and Manning.

Since all native species are protected by law, it's no different to killing an Elephant or a White Rhino and eating it. Showing it during the broadcast wasn't a smart idea for ITV, but that's the background to it.

I quote RSPCA NSW Chief Inspector David O'Shannessy - "It's a reasonable result. It reflects the fact that all animals are protected by the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act. The animal was killed for a TV show - that's not appropriate. The raw footage indicates that, from the first attempt, it took about 90 seconds before it actually died. The legislation says that an animal can be killed for human consumption provided it does not cause unnecessary suffering. Had it been killed and it was over and done with, we might not be having this conversation."

Source here


text:
ICANN approves .xxx domain for pornography

March 19, 2011 Yesterday, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), the agency governing Internet addresses,  approved the creation of an "" Internet address,, on the web, first proposed in 2003. ICANN is the manager of the Internet's s, such ,  and.

ICANN's decision means success for the Florida-based  (ICM), the company that first applied for the .xxx domain in 2004. ICM will oversee the new domain and will sell the .xxx Web addresses. ICM hopes that the establishment of a .xxx domain  will contribute a degree of  predictability and security to the largely unrestrained world of Internet websites. Its chief executive, Stuart Lawley, said, "For the first time, there will be a clearly defined Web address for adult entertainment, out of the reach of minors and as free as possible from fraud or malicious computer viruses."

The decision was criticized by some of the  industry's biggest players who fear they could be the target of  arbitrary censorship by governments and boards regulating  the .xxx domain.

campaigners also criticized the move, saying it gives  the sex industry legitimacy. But since the .xxx system and its vetting process is voluntary, popular pornographic sites are not likely to trade their .com domains for  .xxx. Anti-porn critics say that users who think they are avoiding porn by filtering  out .xxx domains will therefore be misled.

ICM's Lawley saw only positive outcomes from the decision: "Everybody wins. The consumer of adult sites wins. The providers will benefit because more people will become paying customers. And those who don't want to go there will win as well, because the sites will be easier to filter."


text:
User talk:Carlos~enwikinews

-- 02:53, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Carlos. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Carlos~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:13, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:29, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Carlos~enwikinews


text:
User talk:Trenchparty

-- 03:00, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Trenchparty


text:
User talk:Jasperpdx

-- 03:10, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jasperpdx


text:
Thread:Comments:Pirates kill four American hostages/fuck/reply (3)

What gets to me is that people KNOW that, that is a dangerous area...why the hell do they go there in the first place? IMHO they were looking for trouble.


text:
User talk:Blackreaperbk206

-- 03:11, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Blackreaperbk206


text:
User talk:LowTideSun

-- 03:14, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:LowTideSun


text:
User talk:Andrés Urdaneta

-- 03:15, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Andrés Urdaneta


text:
User talk:DimaBorger

-- 03:25, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:DimaBorger


text:
Category talk:2011 Sendai earthquake and tsunami

Wikipedia
As an established editor on Wikipedia has removed all specific links to Wikinews from the various articles of the 2011 quake/tsunami/nuke incident, without even bothering to note their removal, and when asked, said that Wikinews articles were not worth linking to, I will no longer be adding Wikinews links to Wikipedia; it's not worth the effort, when someone else will just come along and delete them without even writing it into the edit comment that they're doing so. You may notice a drop in page accesses due to the link removal. 65.95.15.189 (talk) 03:39, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

 * Would you mind telling us who this established editor is please? This is unacceptable behaviour from a sister project, and I will look into this issue. BarkingFish (talk) 12:52, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
 * It was w:user:Ohconfucius; personally, I think that the timeline article should atleast contain links to wikinews. 65.93.12.101 (talk) 07:43, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Removal is in direct breach of Wikipedia policy process, specifically W:WP:SISTER. Blood Red Sandman (Talk)   (Contribs) 12:54, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
 * w:User:Gold Hat  Diego Grez return fire 13:44, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

 * This discussion is being linked to from the Administrator's notice board/incidents on Wikipedia.
 * It's not user Gold Hat.
 * Related discussion have occurred at
 * w:Talk:2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami (centralized discussion)
 * w:Talk:International reaction to Fukushima I nuclear accidents (affected article)
 * w:Talk:Timeline of the Fukushima nuclear accidents (affected article)
 * w:Talk:Fukushima I nuclear accidents (affected article)
 * 184.144.168.153 (talk) 14:18, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Per this section, comments welcomed.
I have raised this with WP, and the responses aren't looking positive. BarkingFish (talk) 14:06, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
 * ""None of those second-hand 'news reports' adds anything that isn't already covered by the given article or sister articles. [...] the sources cited in our articles are more extensive and up to date than those in WN" At the risk of sounding negative, he is right to some extent. One Wikipedia article covers much more than all of ours put together and is more up-to-date. Wikinews can't compete with the "encyclopedia" for comprehensiveness given its current userbase. Of course, I'd like us to be linked to, and I think the "sister project" argument is valid, but at the end of the day I think it's better to focus our efforts on this project than get involved in a dispute on another one that's not likely to go our way. In the past Wikipedians have been reluctant to allow articles on major events where they already have a very detailed piece. Tempodivalse  [talk]  15:29, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
 * "Our way"... Well, that's difficult for me. Here on Wikinews, it's obviously appropriate for us to want them to link back. I, however, am also a Wikipedian - and I would go against my home project there if I felt that was best. At any rate, my reading of consensus right now is in favour of the links remaining; but then, I'm involved in the dispute. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 18:21, 19 March 2011 (UTC)


text:
User talk:S6108902254225225225

-- 03:46, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:S6108902254225225225


text:
User talk:Younis321

-- 03:55, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Younis321


text:
User talk:DANTETHOR

-- 04:03, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:DANTETHOR


text:
User talk:Mochiziki Tishiaki

-- 04:26, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mochiziki Tishiaki


text:
Thread:Comments:Japan raises severity level of crisis; efforts to cool damaged nuclear power plant continue/some cooling success, and reference for fire engines

I have seen on Google Realtime, folks tweeting about pumps working again in a few reactors. Also, more story about fire engines and external cooling efforts at http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/dy/national/T110318005332.htm appear resourceful.

 * http://goo .gl/iNiHP Google Realtime: fukushima OR "zirconium fuel rods"
 * http://goo .gl/ZYeLY Google Realtime: fukushima cooling
 * http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/RS_Attempts_to_refill_fuel_ponds_1703111.html Some data about pool temperatures and site exposure ratings with a few days history

68.52.174.115 (talk) 04:28, 19 March 2011 (UTC)


text:
User talk:Zainur98

-- 04:38, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Zainur98


text:
User talk:5fx5

-- 04:42, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:5fx5


text:
User talk:Felicia tung

-- 04:58, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Felicia tung


text:
User talk:Luluchile

-- 04:59, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Luluchile


text:
Thread:Comments:Libyan rebels and Gaddafi troops in battle on two fronts/Europeans Hiding?

Is it possible that we will let the Europeans sit on their hands again? When will they do anything of any value without the US leading the way? Europeans are more dependant than anyone on Libyan oil and I would hope this is not the reason for their reticense. When will they stand up for what is right on their own? Shame on them if they don't!


text:
User talk:Markanthony.catubay

-- 05:06, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Markanthony.catubay


text:
User talk:S4saleem

-- 05:54, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:S4saleem


text:
User talk:Muralismartboy

-- 05:54, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Muralismartboy


text:
User talk:Gjaajms

-- 05:54, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gjaajms


text:
User talk:M612rajesh

-- 06:07, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:M612rajesh


text:
User talk:Ob168

-- 06:17, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ob168


text:
User talk:Gyanarjan

-- 06:20, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gyanarjan


text:
User talk:Videaemil

-- 06:45, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Videaemil


text:
User talk:Shokatsukin

-- 06:57, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Shokatsukin


text:
User talk:Бегемот15

-- 07:38, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Бегемот15


text:
User talk:Wildstarlights

-- 07:39, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Wildstarlights


text:
Thread:Comments:Libyan rebels and Gaddafi troops in battle on two fronts/Comments from feedback form - "i would like to see always for..."

i would like to see always for news use these pages agha irfan ahmad


text:
User talk:Raulsann

-- 07:52, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Raulsann


text:
User talk:Jitub77

-- 08:03, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jitub77


text:
User talk:Lasha arjevnishvili

-- 08:37, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lasha arjevnishvili


text:
User talk:Cgjfeng

-- 08:49, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Cgjfeng


text:
User talk:Rocattackdefence*

-- 08:59, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rocattackdefence*


text:
User talk:Maxmarsilius

-- 09:15, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Maxmarsilius


text:
User talk:BenthamBrackets

-- 09:26, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:BenthamBrackets


text:
User talk:Delicateharmony

-- 09:26, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Delicateharmony


text:
User talk:Conmedal

-- 09:34, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Conmedal


text:
User talk:Cometa ariana

-- 09:36, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Cometa ariana


text:
User talk:Giorgi lacabidze

-- 10:02, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Giorgi lacabidze


text:
Thread:Comments:City of Calgary, Canada removes fluoride from drinking water/Flouride

Well, Calgary! You wanted a Muslim mayor and this is what you get! God (the CHRISTIAN GOD and JESUS) help our childreen who will now grow up with tooth decay and cavities thatnks to this Moon god worshiper mayor we have!


text:
User talk:JuanCarlosAgueroRC

-- 10:45, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:JuanCarlosAgueroRC


text:
Thread:Comments:ITV fined A$3000 for cruelty to rat on "I'm A Celebrity...Get Me Out Of Here!"/Really?/reply (18)

Interesting. Thanks Fish.


text:
User talk:Mayank26094

-- 11:45, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mayank26094


text:
Talk:45 killed after Yemen protesters fired upon

Title
The title is incorrect, 41 were killed. GeorgeGriffiths (talk) 14:30, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
 * See, it says here: 2011 Yemeni protests. GeorgeGriffiths (talk) 14:31, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Not anymore it doesn't. C628 (talk) 14:37, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Category
editprotected Can you please add the "2011 Yemen anti-government protests" category to this page? thanks -- The Egyptian Liberal (talk) 18:23, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ — μchip08 08:30, 27 April 2011 (UTC)


text: Comments:45 killed after Yemen protesters fired upon


text:
User talk:Giovanni Sebastiano Bach

-- 12:53, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Giovanni Sebastiano Bach


text:
User talk:Daivakaz255

-- 13:31, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Daivakaz255


text:
User talk:Abdulahi47

-- 13:34, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Abdulahi47


text:
User talk:Dieselkraftstoff für alle!

-- 13:41, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dieselkraftstoff für alle!


text:
User talk:Wokonthee

-- 13:44, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Wokonthee


text:
User talk:Admiral makarov

-- 13:50, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Admiral makarov


text:
User talk:023pikel

-- 13:55, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:023pikel


text:
User talk:Ursus Maior

-- 13:56, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ursus Maior


text:
User talk:Lorizen

-- 14:18, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lorizen


text:
User talk:Errico D'Angelo

-- 14:22, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Errico D'Angelo


text:
User talk:Aiechivu

-- 14:24, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Aiechivu


text:
User talk:Stopniczanin

-- 14:24, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Stopniczanin


text:
User talk:Sidevar

-- 14:31, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sidevar


text:
User talk:Ridvan19

-- 14:39, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ridvan19


text:
User talk:56Covan

-- 14:41, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:56Covan


text:
User talk:Art8266

-- 14:43, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Art8266


text:
Talk:UN carries out first review of US human rights record

"some nations" criticizing US racial profiling?
There's no source for this and it sounds suspect already as it is, so I am changing it. If anyone wants to add a citation feel free to revert.


text:
User talk:Federico boyer

-- 14:54, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Federico boyer


text: Comments:UN carries out first review of US human rights record


text:
User talk:Alesekmoravec

-- 15:13, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Alesekmoravec


text:
User talk:VasilyMD

-- 15:21, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:VasilyMD


text:
Talk:ICANN approves .xxx domain for pornography

Can I add the following articles as "Related news" to this article?

 * 9 October 2010
 * 28 December 2009
 * 25 August 2009
 * 23 February 2009
 * 7 January 2009
 * 3 October 2008
 * 28 January 2008
 * 26 January 2008
 * 19 March 2007
 * 28 December 2009

I would like to add Category:ICANN to them but don't know how as they are archived. I have requested on the article talk pages. Mattisse (talk) 17:23, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

 * Most of these are not directly related. However, feel free to add the three about the .xxx domain using into a 'Related news' section. Archived articles need to be edited by admins, but anyone is free to request changes on the talk page. I'll get to these ones at some point; I don't know if you have or not, but for future reference there's a template to stick next to those requests - editprotected.  Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 17:27, 19 March 2011 (UTC)


text:
User talk:Burnswans

-- 15:35, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Burnswans


text:
User talk:Ibrahim.musa28

-- 15:45, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ibrahim.musa28


text:
User talk:Rella485

-- 15:46, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rella485


text:
Thread:Comments:Israel to build new settlements in West Bank/Comments from feedback form - "of course Israel is not buildi..."/reply

FRANK A YOU LIKE TO TALK SHIT ABOUT THE ISRAELIS. THE JEWS (NO I AM NOT ONE) ARE DOING THE RIGHT THING AND WILL ALWAYS HAVE MY ADMIRATION.


text:
Thread:Comments:Israel to build new settlements in West Bank/pro zionist propaganda/reply

and YOU Frank are obviously pro-Palestinian (terrorist)


text:
User talk:Zloygumanist

-- 16:00, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Zloygumanist


text:
Thread:Comments:Indian foreign minister criticized after reading wrong speech at UN summit/Comments from feedback form - "lolest ever/reply

Yes, it is a shame but not more so than OBAMA's gaffe.


text:
User talk:Immastan

-- 16:08, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Immastan


text: Comments:ICANN approves .xxx domain for pornography


text:
Thread:Comments:Microsoft releases Internet Explorer 9 browser/Support for SVG eh?

That's nice, except that I have no idea how to open SVGs directly on Inkscape from the browser except by non-SVG-supporting IE. How do I do it?


text:
User talk:DJ IvanAmp

-- 16:31, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:DJ IvanAmp


text: Category:ICANN

title: Category:ICANN


text:
Talk:ICANN top-level .xxx domain name not dead yet

How to add a category?
I want to add the Category:ICANN. Is that possible? Mattisse (talk) 16:38, 19 March 2011 (UTC)


text:
Talk:ICANN rejects .xxx top-level domain name proposal

How to add a category?
I want to add the Category:ICANN. Is that possible? Mattisse (talk) 16:39, 19 March 2011 (UTC)


text:
Talk:Adult-only TLD rejected by Internet body

How to add new category?
I want to add the Category:ICANN. Is that possible? Mattisse (talk) 16:40, 19 March 2011 (UTC)


text:
Talk:We'll always have .paris: ICANN votes for top level domain registration in 2009

How to add a category?
I want to add the Category:ICANN. Is that possible? Mattisse (talk) 16:43, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

dot-fm
editprotected ".tv and fm" -> ".tv and .fm"

(i.e. add a period) --Cybercobra (talk) 05:07, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ — Mike moral  ♪♫  06:32, 13 April 2011 (UTC)


text:
Thread:Comments:Earthquake-damaged Fukushima nuclear power plant triggers evacuation/Fukushima I was scheduled to be taken out of service on 24 March 2011/reply (3)

A Tsunami on the coast of Japan sea would have been certainly less important than near the ocean !! martine from cannes


text:
Talk:New top level domain approved

How to add a category?
I want to add the Category:ICANN. Is that possible? Mattisse (talk) 16:54, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:New top level domain approved


text:
Thread:Comments:Final US manufacturer ceases production of lethal injection drug; executions delayed/Just hang them/reply (9)

I agree completely. I just wish my own country would bring the death penalty back


text:
French aircraft on flights over Libya; US missiles launched at targets

March 19, 2011

French military aircraft began flying missions over Libya today in support of a no-fly zone the United Nations approved Thursday.

President Nicolas Sarkozy said that "[o]ur air force will oppose any aggression by Colonel Gadhafi [...] As of now, our aircraft are preventing planes from attacking the town [and] are prepared to intervene against tanks, armored vehicles threatening unarmed civilians." One of the planes deployed has reportedly fired against a ground military vehicle.

The intervention is believed to be the first such action since the no-fly zone was approved. fighter jets have been deployed from, France, and have reportedly encountered no problems during their missions.

This action was followed by United States warships launching cruise missiles at targets in Tripoli and.

Other countries are preparing to assist in enforcing the no-fly zone. Italy has offered to allow aircraft use at their air bases, and Canada has already sent an aircraft to the region, though they will not immediately begin flying missions.

In Benghazi, government forces have reportedly launched an attack on the rebel stronghold, though Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi has denied this claim. Pro-Gaddafi forces have apparently shot down a rebel aircraft.

Some 200,000 people are estimated to have fled the city, according to the UN.


text:
User talk:Priyanka~enwikinews

-- 17:10, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Priyanka. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Priyanka~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:20, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:36, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Priyanka~enwikinews


text:
User:Beaukarpo

རང་ཉིད་ཀྱི་སྐད་ཡིག་སྲུང་སྐྱོབ་གནང་དང་།

འཛམ་གླིང་གི་ཟིན་ཐོ་གསར་པ་ཞིག་བཀོད་དང་།

སྤེའུ་དཀར་པོ།

གཡང་གཟར་གྱི་བྲག་རིའི་སྟེང་དུ། རིའི་སྟེང་ནགས་ཚལ་གྱི་དཀྱིལ་དུ།

ཁྱེད་ཚོའི་ཁང་པའི་ཐོག་ཁའི་སྟེང་། ཨར་སྐྲུན་དང་གནའ་ཤུལ་གྱི་སྟེང་དུ།

དར་དམར་དེ་རྣམས་ཀྱི་སྟེང་དུ། རྡོ་བཅལ་བཏིངས་བའི་ལམ་བུའི་སྟེང་།

ཁྱེད་ཚོའི་ཉིན་ཐོའི་འབྲི་དེབ་ཀྱི་སྟེང་། ཁྱེད་ཚོའི་དྲན་ཤེས་ཀྱི་ནང་དུ།

ཁྱེད་རྣམས་ཀྱི་སེམས་དབུས་ཀྱི་ཡི་གེ་དེ་འབྲི་བ་གནང་རོགས།

བོད།

སྤེའུ་དཀར་པོ།

Facebook group

 * bo.wikipedia in facebook

bo:User:Beaukarpo en:User:Beaukarpo

title: User:Beaukarpo


text:
User talk:Stabilize

-- 17:21, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Stabilize


text:
Thread:Comments:UN carries out first review of US human rights record/Comments from feedback form - "Cuba, Iran and Venezuela lectu..."

Cuba, Iran and Venezuela lecturing US on human rights! Amazing how ridiculous the world has become.


text:
User talk:Dlott~enwikinews

-- 17:41, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Dlott. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Dlott~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:14, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:30, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dlott~enwikinews


text:
Thread:Comments:Final US manufacturer ceases production of lethal injection drug; executions delayed/Just hang them/reply (10)

A BULLET IS MUCH QUICKER. Here in South Africa (the world's crime capital) people commit crime to get INTO jail...free food, free TV, medical in the best hospitals, gyms, education. They get the right to vote and to belong to a union, they demand the best.

These callous murderers attack old people, tie them up, rape them, force boiling water from a kettle into their mouths, cut them up piece by piece or burn them alive... just for the fun of it.

People on this forum talk about inhumane execution of murderers and how it affects their human rights...WHERE THE FUCKING HELL ARE THE RIGHTS OF THE THOUSANDS OF INNOCENT VICTIMS? Get a life and read some South African Newspapers. I had a laugh when reading about British cops that were "very shocked" at a THIRD cop murdered in two years... Over here it happens DAILY. SHOOT THE MURDERING BASTARDS NO MATTER WHAT RACE.


text:
User talk:Jayr169

-- 17:52, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jayr169


text:
User talk:Львів"янин

-- 17:58, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Львів"янин


text:
User talk:Bbrobozio

-- 18:00, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bbrobozio


text:
User talk:8bitW

-- 18:02, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:8bitW


text:
User talk:Claire9~enwikinews

-- 18:03, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Claire9. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Claire9~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:13, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:30, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Claire9~enwikinews


text:
User talk:WardMuylaert

-- 18:18, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:WardMuylaert


text:
Talk:French aircraft on flights over Libya; US missiles launched at targets

Errr is this right
"French aircraft on flights over Libya; US missiles launched"

sounds like the US is firing at the French aircraft?? Maybe should be rephrased on the main page.


text: Comments:French aircraft on flights over Libya; US missiles launched at targets


text:
Thread:Comments:UN carries out first review of US human rights record/Comments from feedback form - "Cuba, Iran and Venezuela lectu..."/reply

Think that's crazy? Wait till Republicans start using the Cuban/Iranian/Venezuelan criticisms (clearly idiotic political posturing that has nothing to do with human rights) as an excuse not to take any of the recommentations seriously.


text:
User talk:Thoughtfortheday

-- 18:45, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Thoughtfortheday


text:
User talk:Ejdguiseley

-- 18:46, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ejdguiseley


text:
User talk:Кенан

-- 18:57, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Кенан


text:
User talk:Laydeepimpin

-- 18:58, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Laydeepimpin


text:
User talk:Onen hag oll

-- 19:00, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Onen hag oll


text:
User talk:TehLulzMastur

-- 19:05, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:TehLulzMastur


text:
User talk:Hello hurray

-- 19:05, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hello hurray