text:
Cardenal Caro Province governor: Pichilemu Municipality to leave 107 families homeless

March 29, 2011 One year and one month after the earthquake that affected most of Chile, and triggered a destructive tsunami throughout its coast, the governor of the, , told  that the "did not register, nor conducted inspection visits" to the homes of 107 families affected by the earthquake. Their registration, and the inspection visits are a needed step for those families, in order to request housing subsidies given by the government because of the catastrophe.

"We found a list of persons that had requested inspection visits from the Public Works Department [of the Pichilemu Municipality], and we were surprised to notice that that people were not registered in our system, and that the director of the Public Works Department never visited them. There is a double fault, an absolute abandonment, because the applications for the subsidies are now closed," Julio Ibarra said.

"[...] We have received criticism that we have not advanced in terms of reconstruction, and the responsibility of giving the information [to the government] is the municipality," Ibarra added. The governor gave the detailed information of the families to the General Comptroller of the Republic (Contraloría General de la República), and is requesting special extension of the deadlines for application to the.

"We are overdue in the issue of housing reconstruction. [...] The Ministry of Housing did not create a special program for the housing reconstruction, they are using the same programs implemented in 2004, [or] 2005, to try to give a solution to the people,", Roberto Córdova, told Wikinews in November 2010.


text:
User talk:Dinh tran hien

-- 00:57, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: User talk:Dinh tran hien


text:
User talk:Chlealuy

-- 01:06, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Chlealuy


text:
Talk:Cardenal Caro Province governor: Pichilemu Municipality to leave 107 families homeless

OR
I am not going to upload the video interview right now (probably tomorrow or on Tuesday), but here I'll put what the Mayor of Píchilemu, Mr. Roberto Córdova said on 19 November 2010:

 * "Donde estamos atrasados es en el tema de la reconstrucción de viviendas. [...] El Ministerio de Vivienda no creo un programa especial para [...] reconstruir casas, sino que con los mismos programas que son parte de la nueva política habitacional implementada a partir del año 2004, 2005, se está aplicando esos mismos programas para darle soluciónes habitacionales a la gente."

The translated quote, or a part of it, will appear on the article. Diego Grez return fire 01:27, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

I noticed that Mr. Córdova had said more things in the original video (not the one I used for certain purposes, and from where I extracted the quote). I edited the video a bit, but it still has the not quoted part on the article. Hope this solves certain problem with verifiability. Diego Grez return fire 00:17, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Translation problem
'[The municipality] "did not register, nor conducted inspection visits" to the homes of 107 families affected by the earthquake.'

That's a poor sentence in English for a number of reasons. (1) We have two different types of past tense used side-by-side with the same subject ("did" and "-ed"); (2) "did not register" should not have "to" following it; (3) it's unclear whether the registration is of the homes or the families, given the wording. I would suggest losing the quotation, because that makes the English sentence structure awkward, and recast the sentence as the Pichilemu Municipality had not registered 107 families affected by the earthquake, and had not inspected their homes. Thoughts?

I would also be inclined to say in the 3rd para that the responsibility is the municipality's, not the municipality. Thoughts on that as well? Bencherlite (talk) 01:09, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * That's correct; sorry about my translation failures :P Diego Grez return fire 01:18, 29 March 2011 (UTC)


text: Talk:Nottingham Express Transit extensions get Government approval


text: Comments:Nottingham Express Transit extensions get Government approval


text:
User talk:E-sub-n

-- 01:38, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:E-sub-n


text:
User talk:Mitchum1917

-- 01:41, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mitchum1917


text:
User talk:Rodrigopiedrahita

-- 01:45, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rodrigopiedrahita


text:
User talk:Kenaii014

-- 01:49, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kenaii014


text:
User talk:Stratist~enwikinews

-- 02:07, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Stratist. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Stratist~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:33, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:37, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Stratist~enwikinews


text:
User talk:Lsvtmc

-- 02:11, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lsvtmc


text:
Thread:Comments:MySpace loses over ten million users in one month/Comments from feedback form - "my space is more for younger p..."

my space is more for younger people


text:
Thread:Comments:MySpace loses over ten million users in one month/Comments from feedback form - "my space is more for younger p..."/reply

Not now, most young people are even moving to Facebook now.


text:
User talk:Starus

-- 02:24, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Starus


text:
User talk:Skye123~enwikinews

-- 02:25, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Skye123. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Skye123~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:31, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:37, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Skye123~enwikinews


text:
User talk:Pe6pe

-- 02:36, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Pe6pe


text: Comments:Thousands gather in London to protest against government cuts


text:
User talk:ChristianBen

-- 02:41, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:ChristianBen


text:
Talk:British police charge taxi driver with murder

article needs copy editing
e.g. "Various tributes have made to Sian O'Callaghan since her death" and "An event held on Saturday night saw the release of hundreds of balloons and Chinese lanterns." (How can an event "saw the release"? Do events "see"?) Mattisse (talk) 10:05, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * P.S. How important are reports of local crimes with no significance outside the immediate location. Isn't this tabloid-like reporting. Easy enough to write, hundreds a day, but how important? Mattisse (talk) 10:13, 28 March 2011 (UTC)


text: Comments:British police charge taxi driver with murder


text:
Talk:Battle for Trafalgar Square, London as violence breaks out between demonstrators and riot police

Poor phrase
Something about "The morning after the night before" sounds redundant or poorly worded. 76.117.247.55 (talk) 12:04, 28 March 2011 (UTC)


text: Comments:Battle for Trafalgar Square, London as violence breaks out between demonstrators and riot police


text:
User talk:Budjunky

-- 02:46, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Budjunky


text:
User talk:Hand~enwikinews

-- 03:01, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Hand. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Hand~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:15, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:32, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hand~enwikinews


text:
User talk:MaceVenGe

-- 03:09, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:MaceVenGe


text:
User talk:Alaskamark

-- 03:22, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Alaskamark


text:
User talk:Valikatonu

-- 03:31, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Valikatonu


text:
User talk:Jross10

-- 03:35, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jross10


text:
User talk:Kmk75s

-- 03:54, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kmk75s


text:
Thread:Comments:MySpace loses over ten million users in one month/Myspace Good Bye!

Wow I am glad. Myspace is no longer a social networking site its just another website. Myspace is no longer being talked about or brought up in any conversation. The best and most talked about social network is Facebook. Myspace is a soon to-be no longer existing website. Good riddance Mysapce!!!


text:
User talk:Unetity

-- 04:00, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Unetity


text:
User talk:Diana lizette

-- 04:23, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Diana lizette


text:
User talk:Anneymerten

-- 04:28, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Anneymerten


text:
User talk:Ersatzkaiser

-- 04:38, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ersatzkaiser


text:
User talk:Queenwhitman

-- 04:54, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Queenwhitman


text:
User talk:Tervenglish

-- 04:58, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tervenglish


text:
User talk:Pvs786

-- 05:08, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Pvs786


text:
User talk:Cmartincaj

-- 05:27, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Cmartincaj


text:
User talk:16newsa

-- 05:33, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:16newsa


text:
User talk:Berryblue63

-- 05:35, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Berryblue63


text:
Thread:Comments:Bomb on Jerusalem bus kills one, over 30 injured/Comments from feedback form - "This article provides no menti..."

This article provides no mention of the Israeli attacks upon the Gaza Strip over the past two weeks, and gives an extremely one-sided impression of recent developments.


text:
User talk:Tieu Hanh11

-- 05:58, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tieu Hanh11


text:
User talk:Mcjumboo

-- 06:29, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mcjumboo


text:
User talk:Nilem12

-- 07:05, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nilem12


text:
User talk:Kurniawan42

-- 07:20, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kurniawan42


text:
User talk:Wwmsugar

-- 07:23, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Wwmsugar


text:
User talk:Luhis molins

-- 07:46, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Luhis molins


text:
User talk:Shveata

-- 08:23, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Shveata


text:
User talk:Ramtheep

-- 08:30, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ramtheep


text:
User talk:Mansoorelahi

-- 08:31, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Our submission guidelines
I'd like to let you know that here at the English Wikinews, we only accept English language news. You've recently made contributions that don't qualify as news. We appreciate your contributions, but we cannot accept the edits you've made, so they have been reverted or deleted.

In the future, if you'd like to submit news, we are more than happy to have your help! Just make sure to check out this article, which talks about what Wikinews is not.

Thank you for your contributions! Gopher65talk 12:39, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mansoorelahi


text:
User talk:TheDukeW

-- 08:36, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:TheDukeW


text:
User talk:Sunwin1960

-- 08:46, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sunwin1960


text:
User talk:Jco023

-- 08:57, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jco023


text:
User talk:Magnoliahoward

-- 09:31, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Copyright violation warning
Hey there! First off, we really appreciate your contribution.

But sometimes users submit an article from somewhere else, not realizing that Wikinews cannot keep copy-and-paste versions of articles which are published elsewhere under a restrictive copyright. An article created in this way is a copyright violation, and Wikinews policy is to erase these even if they are excellent article ideas.

A better way to get an article on an exciting subject published here is to write an original article following the guidelines described in writing an article, or to write a brief explanation of the subject and include the url address of articles or websites to use as sources.

Thanks again!  wacky wace  11:24, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Magnoliahoward


text:
User talk:Artttech

-- 09:44, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Artttech


text:
User talk:John lilburne

-- 09:49, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:John lilburne


text:
User talk:Pardox2308

-- 09:53, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Pardox2308


text:
User talk:Rysio203

-- 09:56, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rysio203


text:
User talk:Hossein Fatemi

-- 10:13, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hossein Fatemi


text:
User talk:Mpocea

-- 10:21, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mpocea


text:
User talk:Carlstr

-- 10:28, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Carlstr


text:
User talk:AltiliaGroupEn

-- 10:38, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:AltiliaGroupEn


text:
User talk:Theryze anne

-- 10:39, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Theryze anne


text:
User talk:CR4ZE

-- 11:01, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:CR4ZE


text:
User talk:Mudasser~enwikinews

-- 11:12, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Mudasser. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Mudasser~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:18, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:34, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mudasser~enwikinews


text:
User talk:Matej jemric

-- 11:13, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Matej jemric


text:
User talk:Sffzh

-- 11:18, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sffzh


text:
User talk:Turzyx

-- 11:38, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Turzyx


text:
User talk:Arpitmax

-- 11:58, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Arpitmax


text:
User talk:Kapil.5739

-- 12:00, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kapil.5739


text:
User talk:Salam2010

-- 12:29, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Salam2010


text:
User talk:Ahmad Reza Estakhr

-- 12:32, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ahmad Reza Estakhr


text:
User talk:Nickymancini

-- 12:36, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nickymancini


text:
Thread:Comments:Bomb on Jerusalem bus kills one, over 30 injured/Comments from feedback form - "She was not a tourist at all! ..."

She was not a tourist at all! She was was studying Hebrew in order to translate the Bible.

24 Mar 2011 ... Wycliffe Bible Translators are sad to announce the death of their member Mary Gardner in a terrorist explosion in Jerusalem on 23 March 2011 ... wycliffe.org.uk/blog/?tag=mary-gardner


text:
User talk:Шакирова Алина Ильдаровна

-- 12:38, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Шакирова Алина Ильдаровна


text:
User talk:ShadyHassan

-- 12:40, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:ShadyHassan


text:
User talk:Rysiomily

-- 12:52, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rysiomily


text:
User talk:ROZOR-18

-- 13:11, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:ROZOR-18


text:
User talk:Arihova

-- 13:30, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Arihova


text:
User talk:S200701084

-- 13:41, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:S200701084


text:
User talk:Usher124

-- 13:47, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Usher124


text:
User talk:Dmaker

-- 13:53, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dmaker


text:
Sheffield tram-train project back on the rails

March 28, 2011

An ambitious project to bring a unique service to  and, in the United Kingdom, is back on track, following the announcement of a 150,000  grant on Thursday. The plans, which were originally to see tram-train operation on a trial basis over the during 2010, have been on the cards since 2008, but were shelved during 2009 to allow alternative proposals to be drawn up. The current plans will now see the vehicles operating along a currently-freight-only line between Rotherham and, before linking up with the existing network there and continuing onto the streets of Sheffield.

The plans to use tram-trains — which are already in widespread use throughout continental Europe, but not at all within the UK — have come about as an alternative to an original proposal to extend the Supertram network to Rotherham, which would be a much larger expense for the same or even fewer benefits.

Whilst the journey between Sheffield and Rotherham is already covered by mainline trains, project officials believe that the new service – running via Meadowhall South and and terminating at Parkgate, with a twenty-minute headway throughout – will attract extra custom to the intermediate points between the two conurbations, as well as making travel easier for people who find it hard to walk to and from ; the tram-trains will serve the heart of the city-centre.

Now that the funding for further feasibility work has been approved,, and the  (SYPTE) can continue to look at the business and project case for the trial, which will look at a range of issues, including economic and environmental benefits of the tram-trains, and ensuring that the vehicles will be safe to run on both the Supertram network and heavy rail tracks.

Transport Minister announced the sum, and stressed the Government’s commitment to the scheme: “There is no doubt about finance being available to deliver the scheme. The Government is committed to a trial of tram-trains in the UK and the route between Sheffield and Rotherham is the best place to develop it. This is a unique scheme.

"Tram-trains offer passengers travelling from rural and suburban areas into city centres a viable, environmentally sound alternative to short and medium car commuting that can cut congestion and reduce overcrowding at railway stations.

“These sorts of rail fleets are already in use on the continent, but this is a first for the UK. The funding we are providing for this exciting project represents a real chance for us to test whether they can be adapted successfully for South Yorkshire and the rest of the UK."

David Brown, director of SYPTE, added: “We have done an awful lot of work on the plans so far and further efforts will look at ensuring the vehicles are compatible with both types of network, which are the same gauge.”

If further investigations are successful, the system could be up and running by 2014.


text:
Thread:Comments:Millions to turn off lights for Earth Hour tonight/what day?

What day? 67.238.142.186 (talk) 14:00, 28 March 2011 (UTC) http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Talk:Millions%20to%20turn%20off%20lights%20for%20Earth%20Hour%20tonight


text:
User talk:Mehta.sutender

-- 14:07, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mehta.sutender


text:
Thread:Comments:Thousands gather in London to protest against government cuts/Comments from feedback form - "Our socialist government run o..."

Our socialist government run out of money? Wat Do?


text:
Thread:Comments:US rapper Nate Dogg dies at age 41/Comments from feedback form - "thank you"

thank you


text:
User talk:Minerva97

-- 14:39, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Princess Beatrice of York is engaged to italian count
Hi. Just to point out, the article in its current form has a basic difficulty with freshness. We only publish articles about current events. That article is about an event that was already three calendar days old when the article was created, which is already the outer limit to how long we may be willing to let an article slide before declaring it "stale". The article also was not submitted for review, at the time; and now it's more than a week later. We recommend submitting an article while its focal event can still be described as either "today" or "yesterday", to give plenty of time for the review process. At this point, the original focal event of that article — the announcement of engagement on September 26 — is no longer a current event; a news article would have to focus on some later development. --Pi zero (talk) 11:38, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

title: User talk:Minerva97


text:
British music royalties suffer first ever decrease

March 29, 2011

In the United Kingdom, has announced that the total  that artists in the music industry receive has decreased by 1%. This is the first time that such a decline has ever occurred.

The company has reported that the total was 611.2 million (977.8 million, 693.9 million) in 2010, a decrease of overall annual revenue of 1%, or £7 million (US$11.2 million, €7.9 million), from 2009. PRS for Music has claimed that this fall was due to lower sales of and, as well as digital.

The collection society, which is a representation of seventy-five thousand writers, composers and publishers of music, gathers royalties from music being used in excess of twenty-five billion times annually by various means, including television / radio, commercial businesses, musical venues, Compact Discs and DVDs.

Robert Ashcroft is the of PRS for Music and is responsible for being the representative of such British music artists as,  and. Speaking about this news, Ashcroft said: "The loss of high street outlets, the slowdown in physical music sales as well as the challenges capturing the full value of music usage online has meant that for the first time we have seen royalties collected dip. Previously, any reduction from falling physical sales had been offset by our strong performance in music licensing both in the UK and internationally. In 2010 slower growth at home and abroad failed to fully mitigate the decline."

In 2010, the sales of music physically and digitally grew by 7% to achieve 120 million units. Meanwhile, sales of compact discs fell by 12.4% to a total of 98.5 million. British global entertainment retail chain has attempted to save money by closing down sixty of its shops in the UK. In 2010, royalties' growth reduced in speed to 4.3%.

Simon Neil, of Scottish group, explained that "[t]he thing about PRS is for a lot of bands it's the only way you make money. In our first six years of being in a band that was the only kind of income we had. It's the bread and butter for bands. It's almost your only guaranteed source of income."

PRS for Music has stated that its payout to its members was decreased by £800,000 (US$1,3 million, €900,000), due to improved society efficiency and a reduction in costs related to administration. According to , the small royalty drop may trigger a larger decline, causing new musical composers and writers to avoid joining the music industry. The company believes that further action needs to be taken to prevent the lack of CD sales and compete with illegal downloads, including the development of legal download services.


text:
User talk:Sunit Karmakar

-- 14:59, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sunit Karmakar


text:
User talk:Hugo Eduardo Diaz

-- 15:05, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hugo Eduardo Diaz


text:
User talk:Afmoo

-- 15:08, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Afmoo


text:
User talk:SeanKeane77

-- 15:17, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:SeanKeane77


text:
User talk:パリンポリンサン

-- 15:20, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:パリンポリンサン


text:
User talk:NeleMujanovic

-- 15:23, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:NeleMujanovic


text:
User talk:Nbjani

-- 15:29, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nbjani


text:
User talk:Marmaria9494

-- 15:30, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Marmaria9494


text:
User talk:Beukebo

-- 15:31, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Beukebo


text:
User talk:Shullika Rosa

-- 15:36, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Shullika Rosa


text:
User talk:Steflaki97

-- 15:39, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Steflaki97


text:
User talk:Mimi Ubitha

-- 15:44, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mimi Ubitha


text:
User talk:Chasif

-- 15:55, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Chasif


text:
User talk:Kareladin

-- 16:08, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kareladin


text:
User talk:RackDaddy

-- 16:23, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:RackDaddy


text:
User talk:Haldisn

-- 16:24, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Haldisn


text:
User talk:Neza Loncar

-- 16:36, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Neza Loncar


text:
User talk:Piskopat tr

-- 16:50, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Piskopat tr


text:
User talk:Jes029

-- 16:55, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jes029


text:
User talk:Jbb1996

-- 17:17, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jbb1996


text:
User talk:Pavankumar2233

-- 17:26, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Pavankumar2233


text:
User talk:Zebhenry91

-- 17:32, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Zebhenry91


text:
User talk:Manisha Mahajan

-- 17:34, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Manisha Mahajan


text:
User talk:Metal-Master.666

-- 17:42, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Metal-Master.666


text:
User talk:Martijnatema

-- 17:50, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Martijnatema


text:
User talk:B-webbdeuces

-- 17:58, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:B-webbdeuces


text:
User talk:NastroAdesivo

-- 18:11, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:NastroAdesivo


text:
User talk:Sven Hist

-- 18:20, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sven Hist


text:
User:Phearson

Hello, I am Phearson And I hail from the English Wikipedia. I am no longer active here as of 2013. You are welcome to read and listen to my voice on articles I have contributed here, please be aware however that as of this writing it has been about a decade and the person you hear... here... was in his 20s and sounds much younger then he does today.

Articles Published

 * Stun gun found on JetBlue flight in Newark, New Jersey
 * Syrian security forces raid Homs, one killed, twenty injured
 * Robert Gibbs may work for Facebook
 * New York City disputes 2010 Census
 * George Cloony to be defense witness in Berlusconi sex case
 * BP lose laptop containing sensitive claimant data
 * Libyan foreign minister defects to the UK
 * Barry Bonds guilty of obstruction
 * UN attacks Gbagbo military positions in Ivory Coast
 * NATO deploys helicopters in Libya
 * Valuable paintings stolen from Greek gallery
 * Rapper Snoop Dogg arrested on cannabis charges

Articles not authored, but have provided audio

 * ABC News yanks 20/20 investigation of Tom Cruise and Scientology
 * Standard & Poor's lowers the U.S. credit outlook to 'negative'
 * Japanese nuclear plant operators ordered to compensate affected families amid calls for prime minister to resign
 * Nine killed as protests spread to Kandahar over Qur'an burning
 * Barack Obama announces 2012 re-election bid
 * Thousands gather in London to protest against government cuts
 * Cardenal Caro Province governor: Pichilemu Municipality to leave 107 families homeless
 * Sheffield tram-train project back on the rails
 * Battle for Trafalgar Square, London as violence breaks out between demonstrators and riot police
 * British police charge taxi driver with murder
 * MySpace loses over ten million users in one month
 * Guatemalan president and first lady apply for divorce
 * Millions to turn off lights for Earth Hour tonight
 * Bomb on Jerusalem bus kills one, over 30 injured
 * Explosion at Yemen weapons factory kills dozens
 * Gaddafi loyalists go on offensive, rebels pushed back
 * First images received from orbit around Mercury
 * US President Obama considering supplying arms to Libyan rebels
 * All change for Nottingham trams as new operator announced
 * Mars Opportunity rover passes distance milestone
 * LulzSec claims Sony network hack
 * LulzSec attacks Nintendo server
 * Indiana Democrats block session to halt labor bill

title: User:Phearson


text:
User talk:Csftg

-- 18:22, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Csftg


text:
User talk:TimSallinger

-- 18:37, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:TimSallinger


text:
User talk:Chito Kankintubo

-- 19:00, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Chito Kankintubo


text:
User talk:Ponzio domé

-- 19:07, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ponzio domé


text:
User talk:Francois16

-- 19:10, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Francois16


text:
User talk:Webcamboy

-- 19:13, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Webcamboy


text:
User talk:Benny Leo

-- 19:22, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Benny Leo


text:
User talk:Microchip08/Archive/4

Request that you add an option
This section has been migrated. [ Wikinews:Water cooler/Policy]

Special report on Japanese tsunami emergency in Pichilemu, Chile
Hey I think the category you added to Special report on Japanese tsunami emergency in Pichilemu, Chile, "2010 Chile Earthquake" is the wrong event. That was a different earthquake. --Ashershow1talk 17:10, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

note to self
Dendodge 9 Bleep 0 Jersey 8 — μ 11:36, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Two students shot at Delaware State University
This wouldn't be an archival copyedit, in my judgment, but a correction notice. I also think it needs corroboration. The only surviving source addressing it says officials said Newark, NJ, so if (as seems common sense) it's DE, the correction notice should make it clear that our article is still an accurate snapshot of what was known at the time. --Pi zero (talk) 17:45, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, I think you're right. I'm not sure how to proceed, however. By the way, add "redesign correction to be not so scary looking" to the to-do list — μ 17:51, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * How's User:Dendodge/Correction as a start on your second point? I did it a while ago, it seemed appropriate to mention it now. DEN  DODGE  18:18, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Looks too much like delete. — μ 18:19, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Presumably, we want two mutually independent sources that say Newark, DE. I've found one easily, a source for the en.wp article — .  I'll look for a second.

 * Each correction notice should leap out at the reader on arrival, because its purpose is to prevent xem from being misled when reading the article. Eyes may slide right over an  no matter what it says.  --Pi zero (talk) 19:23, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Request to review
Could you please review my latest article? It is called 'Worst song of all time' becomes YouTube sensation. Please try to review this as soon as you can as its about to stale. I would really appreciate your co-operation with this. -- Rayboy8 ( my talk ) ( my contributions ) 00:45, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm not in the best position to sit down and thoroughly review an article, sorry. — μ 11:36, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Firefox 4
FWIW, I've just upgraded to Firefox 4.0 —which is, as advertised, wonderfully fast— and the whighlighter gadget no longer does anything. --Pi zero (talk) 14:33, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
 * No idea why, and I can't check in order to fix. — μ 03:04, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
 * As of this morning, I've got green underlines again. No idea why.  --Pi zero (talk) 14:34, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Recent 'drama'
I hope my recent contributions in an effort to defuse an unacceptable situation meet with your approval.

You may note the "post-mortem" item on a sub-page of Geoff's talk; your comments on that, subsectioned, would be most welcome.

Geoff starting on, what I felt was an attempt to lay groundwork for defence of later outbusts, isn't. A followup in the same form based on the actual version reviewed may reinforce that more-than-serious quality concerns existed; plus any remarks on xe's response to what I characterised as a "terse rejection"(see xyr talk).

Obviously I'd want my advice on WN:AAA considered, possibly given clear indication it meets with community consensus, and a strict interpretation and application of action suggested therein.

Would you concur? --Brian McNeil / talk 07:21, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

British police charge taxi driver with murder
Could you please review British police charge taxi driver with murder? I would appreciate your co-operation with this. -- Rayboy8 ( my talk ) ( my contributions ) 21:13, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

w
Can you create a copy of this evil template that works on the embargoed wiki? --Brian McNeil / talk 12:32, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * iirc — μ 13:17, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Gatso-image-capture.jpg
Take it to DR; this is a university research image which is no longer publicly available. There is every reason to believe this may be used in future, and the image is newsworthy in itself. --Brian McNeil / talk 12:30, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Interview
As you probably saw on scoop, I've landed the requisite interview.

Can you go on the embargoed wiki and see what you think would be the most appropriate questions? I feel eight or less is reasonable in this case. There's a lot of information to go around that section. --Brian McNeil / talk 16:16, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I have my interview responses, and have begun filling out additional detail on this. I want to be up in terms of people having followed the scoop correspondence; can you check in on the eporters' wiki and offer your opinion? --Brian McNeil / talk 16:49, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

File:India Against Corruption.png
Will this do? If not, could you point the way to instructions on how to write up a fair use rationale for wikinews? Thanks! Mattisse (talk) 13:54, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Yep, progress
=  --Pi zero (talk) 15:24, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Party hat (fun).png I've just removed w from dateline again, because it stops me from removing the w call for things like dateline. Obviously this isn't ideal — any ideas? [also, as you've probably just noticed, w nav] — μ 15:29, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Null edits
On the off chance you happened never to have crossed paths with this nuance: Null edits needn't alter the page; just click the edit tab, click the "Save page" button, and it purges the page without adding to its revision history. (I do this to the main page to call up newly published articles.) --Pi zero (talk) 18:45, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Hm. I was aware of that, but it still showed ... when I tried that, so I thought I was doing it wrong — I'm not entirely sure what happened, as those edits didn't do anything either. Thanks for the tip, — [[User:Microchip08|μ 19:43, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * A tip in return: clicking the [[Image:Reload page.png|20px]] icon that's on the Main Page will purge it as well. :-) — μ 19:48, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * My eyes have been sliding over that icon on the main page without seeing it. (How to hide a hippopotamus.)  Thanks!  --Pi zero (talk) 20:52, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Editing
Thanks for your suggestion, but I edit completely online. I just make many edits to complete an article. Hope that is ok as I don't know how to edit without knowing how it looks online (with the formatting and all). Regards, Mattisse (talk) 23:14, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * There's nothing wrong with it at all! I simply assumed that the double-spacing was from Microsoft Word or somesuch doing strange things. Good luck with the rest of the article. — μ 23:18, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * No. I don't even have Microsoft Word. Mattisse (talk) 23:21, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Added
Talkback! here. Ebe123 (talk) 16:51, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

question about "comments" page
Hi, I am wondering why Comments:Apple's data is dirtiest, says Greenpeace doesn't have a link Back to article like Comments:Qur'an-burning pastor jailed after mosque protest barred does, for example? (I don't know how to fix that.) Regards, Mattisse (talk) 15:03, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Because Tadpole created the comments page before the article was published, and the script isn't clever enough to add the proper comments header. アンパロ Io ti odio! 15:05, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
 * ^ that. — μchip08 15:09, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Is there no way to fix it? I find Back to article very helpful.  Mattisse (talk) 15:16, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
 * LQT can't be added without deleting or blanking the page; which is undesirable as there are post-publication comments added to it. The header might be able to be added, but I don't know the template location (or if it would be relevant) — μchip08 15:18, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
 * For better or worse, I left a note on Tadpole's talk page. --Pi zero (talk) 16:05, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Coastguard investigation finds lax safety culture contributed to Deepwater Horizon disaster
What links were you thinking of? --Pi zero (talk) 18:06, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
 * largest oil spill Deepwater Horizon, and explosion all link to separate Wikipedia articles, but link to the same Wikinews category, which I doubt is what is intended. — μchip08 22:04, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

 * Mm. I've been noticing that case lately, as it comes up in many of the Deepwater Horizon articles.  Having each of those links go to our category is reasonable, yet having all of them go to it doesn't quite work.  Granted, forcing the links and thereby putting them in Category:Pages with forced foreign links could be an interim solution... but in this case, I'm not happy deferring resolution to the indefinite future until I have some idea what form the eventual resolution can take.

 * The reason I want to figure this out now (even though implementing it can still be deferred) is the nature of my long-term vision. Categorization, even though itself a vast long-term task, is just one step in solving the larger problem of localizing the wikilinks in our articles.  I've launched into the categorization partly because it's a necessary step and one already identifiable, but also because I hope to gain insight, through massive breadth of experience from categorizing things, into other steps.

 * We're very close to identifying another step, here. I can almost touch it.  It's tantalizing.

 * Here's another case I've had my eye on for some months. Eventually we'll have a category for "Space Shuttle", with a subcategory for each individual vehicle.  But the articles commonly have links to Wikipedia articles on individual missions (STS-XXX).  Most missions are lucky to have one article about xem here, let alone three or more, so there's no chance xe'll ever have categories here.  So, what can we provide as an interim link, effectively catching the reader on the way out and providing some useful information plus an opportunity to continue browsing Wikinews?  --Pi zero (talk) 13:28, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

 * My current thinking is the redundant wikilinks are encyclopedic in nature, and, rather than wikilinks from the text, they should be either sister links provided on the article, or perhaps sister links from the category. I'm hoping to upgrade our treatment of wikilinks in articles, and especially want to upgrade our treatment of wikilinks by topic cat (which currently supports at most one link to each sister, and doesn't name it, which works sometimes but not always).  --Pi zero (talk) 19:36, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Sorry 'bout that!
Looks like I tried to block him at the same time as you! Regards,  wacky wace  20:18, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Template:Indefblocked
I did a double-take on this. There appear to be two  's, the second of which has a matching   but the first seems to match the   you. Am I missing something? --Pi zero (talk) 23:31, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Redirect problem
Thanks for fixing. Mattisse (talk) 23:45, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. [[File:Smile.gif]] — μchip08 23:46, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

could you fix this? - it seems orphaned
[ Baffling] seems to be orphaned after you edited it. Or am I not understanding something? Regards, Mattisse (talk) 17:34, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * It's right where you left it. [[File:Emoticon tongue.png]] — μchip08 17:37, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry! I wasn't understanding how it was showing up on "Recent changes". My apologies. (I don't understand why you changed it thought, as it is my understanding that is how to formate wikipedia articles. No?) Mattisse (talk) 17:48, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Indeed. However, (if I understand Pi zero correctly, w categorises pages into links that should/could be "fixed" in future: adding it to non-articlespace clogs the categories up more than is required. (Mind you, one could just use w, which I'd completely forgotten about when I edited your comment.) — μchip08 17:55, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure. It seems like when Pi zero goes through the articles I have written, he changes every link to w| on the "just in case" theory. As for w, could you explain what that does? 18:12, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * All articles could/should/would be w'd. Many meta-pages, however, don't need to be (as they don't require 'fixing'). As for nocat, it tells the template not to categorise itself the way it normally does. — μchip08 18:17, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Miscellany
--Pi zero (talk) 14:12, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Where did you learn how to do the markup for ? I'm studying such things intently, the past week, as I gather techniques for a "story form".
 * So, why did you delete your user page, anyway? (Just wondering.)
 * Wondering, do templates xe/xyr/xem materially benefit the project? I'm thinking both of Amgine's phrasing re userboxes in Brian New Zealand v. Amgine and, further afield, of Warren Burger's phrasing re obscenity in Roth v. United States.
 * Imho we actually managed to end up with a good new look for the correction template. Score one for community discussion. :-)
 * Mainly by looking at the URIs created by mw:Extension:Inputbox.
 * Because I kept getting distracted on making it better.,
 * Doubt it. I created them because I could, and because a few users seem to find xe as a word somewhat annoying. Feel free to delete under user request if you want to.
 * [[File:Smiley---D.gif]]. By the way, http://border-radius.com gives you the code for cross-browser curvy corners (as -moz-border-radius only works on Mozilla browsers). I'm still undecided whether to tweak on a per-skin basis, as [ this], for example, looks odd. — μchip08 14:19, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

 * Is it possible to create a user preference for how 'xe' displays?  Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 14:21, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
 * One can set one's gender in Special:Preferences (e.g. Dendodge is a ). — μchip08 14:32, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I meant something to affect how xe/xyr was displayed in text. Ofc, that raises the problem that not all users are a common gender, but w/ever. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 15:16, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
 * There's probably a way to change all instances of xe to they if one really wanted. → — μchip08 17:00, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

bin Laden
Sorry about accidentally removing your additions; I saw this vandalism and reverted it but it seems your additions somehow got caught in my diff.  wacky wace  15:56, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
 * : -) — μchip08 15:59, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Blocks of dynaic IPs
I'm not going to touch your adjustment of Diego's block. However, I will point out that most dynamic IPs have minimum lease life of 72 hours nowadays. Additionally, many ISPs using a DHCP pool for broadband will give week+ leases; or, due to people leaving their ADSL/cable modems on 24/7, the lease will instantly be renewed on the old address.

/me is working inside an ISP,.... And, short lease-life is a thing from dialup. --Brian McNeil / talk 10:20, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

your suggestion to me
You suggested to me that I filed a Dispute resolution because of the check user that was filed against me.

However, I have looked at the Dispute resolution page that you gave as a reference, and I can't figure out how to file one. Could you please explain how to do it? Thanks, Mattisse (talk) 20:22, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

What to do?
From the Dispute resolution directions:

 * Step three: Ask the community for help

If things seem to be getting unwieldy, either party may include a template on their userpage to ask the community for some assistance. Often times, the input of third parties can greatly reduce the bitter quips and accusations that slip out when trying to resolve an issue yourself. The community is often times willing to see both sides and can help you and your fellow Wikinewsie find some common ground. It's still experimental, but give it a try.

How do I do this. How do I solicit input of third parties? I have no idea what is going on. I know a lot is "off wiki" which I am not a part of. How do I inform others to give their viewpoint? I cannot participate in the project until this is resolved. Mattisse (talk) 00:15, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
 * You could, for example, post a single edit on the Water cooler (limited, nonpartisan), as opposed to editing lots of users' talk pages with the exact same edit (mass, partisan). A user directly involved in the situation might want a message, but you posted messages to many other users' talk pages that are/were not directly involved in the situation. — μchip08 00:26, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I posed on the Water cooler - Assistance. Is that the right place? I can't tell which of those options are appropriate. Thanks, Mattisse (talk) 01:48, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
 * P.S. It would help if the directions at Dispute resolution were clearer. A person in my position finds it very hard to understand what to do. I had to ask questions to even figure out how to file a Dispute resolution, as there are no instructions. Is there a way I could get help in navigating this business, as it is all very confusing and I feel helpless. I am basically bidding goodbye to those who have been kind to me, and there are many. Mattisse (talk) 01:48, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for this, diff, I agree with you that this type of behavior is disruptive and wholly inappropriate on this project. I hope you are well. ;) Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 00:17, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Indeed. Thank you, Microchip08. Gryllida 07:34, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Meddling with blocks you don't understand
, on Wikinews, is not the same as on Wikipedia.

Congratulations on unblocking a Willy on Wheels sock because you didn't check the contribution history, and failed to notice the block predated SUL.

Have you done any other ill-advised unblocks like this recently? --Brian McNeil / talk 20:40, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Psychonaut says it is now merged; and the user, as confirmed on their Wikipedia talk page, has control of the account. — μchip08 20:42, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Requests for permissions/Oversight/TUFKAAP
At the moment, you have both a (weak) support vote and an oppose vote standing. Did you intend to strike the earlier oppose vote when you added the later weak-support one? --Pi zero (talk) 03:53, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * They are, effectively, votes on two different requests - the first (oppose) when it was CU and OS, and a cautious support for OS only. So they are, in fact, not mutually exclusive. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 06:32, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * When I [ wrote] it it was as an indent of my previous vote; Cirt split it into separate votes, causing the confusion. — μchip08 09:01, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I see. (Actually, TUFKAAP simply withdrew the checkuser half of it, but that's as may be.)  I attempted to clarify the status of the earlier vote; obviously, if the way I went about it doesn't meet with your approval, adjust to taste.  --Pi zero (talk) 11:24, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Goodness.....!
39 articles created, and you've never even received one of these....?! That seems a pity! --Bddpaux (talk) 22:01, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Reviewer
Priv restored, per WN:FR/RFP. --Pi zero (talk) 23:29, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Note on abandonment
WN:PROD says to wait till an article hasn't been worked on for four days before marking it abandoned. --Pi zero (talk) 15:59, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Ah, fair enough. I thought it was two. Thanks for the heads up, — μchip08 16:02, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it's confusing. The template docs only mention two days, which is how long to wait after applying the template before deletion (or userspacing).  So I just added a note.  --Pi zero (talk) 16:19, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Request for reviewing and other assistance
Hi. Next week is the start of the and two Wikinewies will be attending to cover the para-alpine skiing ahead of the 2014 Winter Paralympics. This is part of an effort outlined at IPC Alpine Ski World Championships. Immediately following this event, there will be a Meetup in Barcelona where Wikinews, the Paralympics and efforts to similar sport coverage will be discussed. At the moment, there are only two active reviewers on a daily basis. Demonstrating an ability to get reviews for these types of events done quickly is important for Wikinews credibility and gaining access to these types of events. I would really appreciate it if you could sign up on the IPC World Championship page to review, promote articles published during this period, assist in translating these articles into another language or attend the meetup in Barcelona. Thanks. --LauraHale (talk) 09:31, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Wikinews Writing contest 2013 is here. :) Please sign up to participate?
We've created the Writing contest 2013, which will start on April 1 and end on June 1. It is modeled on the successful 2010 contest. Unlike the previous version, points are available for people who conduct reviews. (With a University of Wollongong class currently contributing articles, extra assistance is appreciated at this time.) It presents a great incentive for you to renew your reviewing chops, contribute some original reporting not being done by the main stream media, and write some synthesis articles on topics that could use more attention. People should be around to review to prevent a backlog if you just want to write, and several reviewers have access to scoop to make it easier to review any original reporting you do. If you are interested in signing up, please do so on Writing contest 2013/entrants. There is at least one prize on offer for the winner along with the opportunity to earn some barn stars as a way of thanking you for your participation. :D --LauraHale (talk) 10:36, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

title: User talk:Microchip08/Archive/4


text:
User talk:Dunkson

-- 19:43, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dunkson


text:
User talk:Tschermys

-- 19:43, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tschermys


text:
User talk:Malcomx571

-- 19:52, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Malcomx571


text: User talk:I set my dick on fire!

title: User talk:I set my dick on fire!


text:
User talk:Mehmetbagci

-- 20:00, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mehmetbagci


text:
User talk:Terryhaese

-- 21:06, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Terryhaese


text:
User talk:Xtianmdo

-- 21:07, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Xtianmdo


text:
User talk:Lord Spring Onion

-- 21:29, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lord Spring Onion


text:
User talk:Ignis Umbrae

-- 21:32, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ignis Umbrae


text:
User talk:Linda T 53

-- 21:35, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Linda T 53


text:
User talk:Ggvtavo

-- 21:38, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ggvtavo


text:
User talk:I love round objects lots

-- 21:55, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:I love round objects lots


text:
User talk:Naveedahmedji

-- 21:59, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Naveedahmedji


text:
User talk:Men Are Hot and Spicy

— μ 22:00, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Men Are Hot and Spicy


text:
User talk:Hdiegruber

-- 21:59, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hdiegruber


text:
User talk:Favonian is the Worst

-- 22:03, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Favonian is the Worst


text:
User talk:EthanL

-- 22:19, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:EthanL


text:
User talk:Alfredo0.23

-- 22:20, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Alfredo0.23


text:
User talk:Luis Carlos Rosales Lobo

-- 22:26, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Luis Carlos Rosales Lobo


text:
User talk:Dingowheezer

-- 22:32, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dingowheezer


text:
User talk:I love penguins

-- 22:37, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:I love penguins


text:
User talk:Hamzaelrey

-- 22:38, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hamzaelrey


text:
User talk:Strongilocentrotus

-- 22:59, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Strongilocentrotus


text:
User talk:Juan ignacio v.v

-- 23:08, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Juan ignacio v.v


text:
New York City disputes 2010 Census

March 29, 2011 New York City officials plan to dispute the Census Bureau's data, after it was discovered that the 2010 Census reported only minimal growth in New York City and in the boroughs of Brooklyn and Queens.

On Sunday, NYC mayor Michael Bloomberg stated "[t]hat can't be possible," and announced that the city would formally challenge the bureau's findings. NY Senators Kirsten Gillibrand and Charles Schumer also expressed interest in the alleged error.

"These are high growth areas w/large immigrant populations. It's crucial that #NYC get the federal funds & the representation it deserves." said Sen. Gillibrand on her Twitter page. Sen. Schumer, a resident from Brooklyn, also complained, "The Census Bureau has never known how to count urban populations and needs to go back to the drawing board," he said in a statement. "It strains credulity to believe that New York City has grown by only 167,000 people over the last decade. To claim that growth over the last decade in Brooklyn was 1.6% and growth in Queens was 0.1% flies in the face of reality."

In order for the city to challenge the count, city officials will contact Commerce Secretary Gary Locke, and will undergo a process known as the Count Question Resolution Program.

title: New York City disputes 2010 Census


text:
Explosion at Yemen weapons factory kills dozens

March 29, 2011

An explosion at a weapons factory in Yemen killed dozens of people yesterday. According to estimates, over one hundred people may have died in the blast.

According to the BBC, at least 78 people were killed, while  reported that over one hundred people had been killed. The explosion occurred in the southern town of, located in the province of Abyan.

Local media reported that forces loyal to had raided the factory on Sunday. They added that residents were forced to gather supplies from the factory, when a cigarette reportedly triggered the explosion.

State news agency  said that militants had "seized the factory on Sunday and pushed citizens to [loot] its contents, which led to inflaming of gunpowder and explosives in the factory."

A local doctor said that "[t]his accident is a true catastrophe, the first of its kind in Abyan. There are so many burned bodies. I can't even describe the situation."

An accurate death toll is reportedly difficult to ascertain due to the condition of bodies, many of which have severe burns.


text:
User talk:Trompolori

-- 23:33, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Trompolori


text: Talk:Sheffield tram-train project back on the rails


text: Comments:Sheffield tram-train project back on the rails


text:
Talk:New York City disputes 2010 Census

Review of revision 1203855 [Failed]

 * Um, isn't it better to just fix minor mistakes like this yourself than fail the entire article? This is part of the reason review times are so long - unnecessary fails. Tempodivalse [talk]  23:40, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

 * I'm sorry, this is my first article. I didn't mean for it to fail immediately. Phearson (talk) 23:44, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * You've got nothing to be sorry for; for a first article, this is an unusually good one at first glance. C628 (talk) 23:46, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:New York City disputes 2010 Census


text:
User talk:Tolez

-- 00:09, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tolez


text: Comments:Cardenal Caro Province governor: Pichilemu Municipality to leave 107 families homeless


text:
Forces loyal to Ouattara plan to seal Ivory Coast border

March 30, 2011

After a battle for the Ivory Coast town of, armed forces loyal to president-elect Alassane Ouattara have announced an effort to seal the border between the Ivory Coast and Liberia.

On Monday, Ouattara forces, dubbed, and those loyal to Laurent Gbagbo, who claims to be the winner of a disputed election last fall, began fighting in Duekoue, a western town of strategic importance due to its position at a crossroads, with access to both Liberia and Guinea.

According to a spokesperson for Ouattara, Seydou Ouattara, the New Forces won the battle, the latest in a series of settlements they have taken control of in recent weeks, and have moved south towards the town of Guiglo.

The New Forces also announced they plan to seal the Ivory Coast—Liberia border, as Gbagbo is accused of importing Liberians to fight in his forces. Spokesperson Ouattara said that "[t]oday's operation will prevent Gbagbo from recruiting and training Liberians as he has been doing."

According to the United Nations, around 460 people have died in violence since the disputed elections, and another million have left the country.


text:
User talk:Bnjmnwroberts7

-- 00:37, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bnjmnwroberts7


text:
User talk:Villasmil

-- 00:38, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Villasmil


text:
Thread:Comments:Wikinews interviews 0 A.D. game development team/Comments from feedback form - "0ad is the best open source ga..."

0ad is the best open source game ever and this interview was very interesting!


text:
User:Tempodivalse/Thoughts about the project

These are a collection of thoughts and suggestions for the Wikinews community. They are not intended to be judgments about any particular individuals.

 * Wikinews must strive to be as professional in interacting with other users as it is in writing articles. Community and content are inseparable. If the former falters, so will the latter.

 * Insulting others helps nothing and hurts everything. At best, the insulter gains a temporary, petty feeling of self-satisfaction. At worst, outsiders gain a poor impression of the project and lose desire in contributing. Personal attacks unnecessarily distract users from the central goal of contributing.

 * It is important to listen to the suggestions and advice of new contributors. Those who work within the inner workings of the project frequently lose perspective and fail to see the bigger picture.

 * Having fresh eyes critique and offer suggestions is essential to progress. Wikinews must be open to change to ensure continued prosperity. If the small community, enclosed in a bubble, feverously believes something to be right, yet the rest of the world disapproves and thinks it is wrong, is there any future for Wikinews?

 * Policy should dictate ideas, not specific actions. A rule can be followed to the letter yet broken in spirit.


text:
User talk:Mwchadwiki

-- 01:08, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mwchadwiki


text:
User talk:Boblehest

-- 01:37, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Boblehest


text:
User talk:Pbradleyrobb

-- 01:40, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Pbradleyrobb


text:
User talk:Guigibim

-- 02:13, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Guigibim


text:
Former White House press secretary Robert Gibbs may work for Facebook

March 29, 2011 , the former press secretary for the U.S. White House, has been said to be in talks with Facebook about possible future employment as a manager for the communications aspect of the company.

According to an anonymous source close to the company, Gibbs is being pressed to quickly accept the job, in which Mr. Gibbs may receive millions of dollars in both salary and initial stock options for a planned public offering of Facebook Inc. in 2012.

Both Facebook and Gibbs have declined to comment.

Mr. Gibbs, who has worked for the Obama administration for two years, left in February 2011, and was reportedly "relaxing" and had denied rumors that he was planning to campaign for chairman of the Democratic National Committee if were to leave the committee to run for a position in the senate.

In recent months, Facebook has stepped up lobbying the US capital to communicate its public image to policy makers, and may use Gibbs for their public relations stratagem in the future.


text:
User talk:Saloiandlily

-- 02:17, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Saloiandlily


text:
User talk:Jjuuaann ddiieeggoo

-- 02:29, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jjuuaann ddiieeggoo


text:
User talk:Victorbolarsson

-- 02:38, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Victorbolarsson


text:
User talk:Cspowerdj

-- 03:11, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Cspowerdj


text:
User talk:Miracle Drakon

-- 03:33, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Miracle Drakon


text:
User talk:Takemoe

-- 03:41, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Takemoe


text:
User talk:Dvsnvrdie

-- 03:52, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dvsnvrdie


text:
User talk:Gamliel Fishkin

-- 03:54, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gamliel Fishkin


text: Talk:Explosion at Yemen weapons factory kills dozens


text: Comments:Explosion at Yemen weapons factory kills dozens


text:
User talk:Royzane

-- 04:10, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Royzane


text:
User talk:Codrinb

-- 04:46, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Codrinb


text:
User talk:Tjjkkl

-- 04:48, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tjjkkl


text:
User talk:Sajmadu

-- 04:57, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sajmadu


text:
User talk:Daniel98609

-- 04:58, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Daniel98609


text:
User talk:Vangioicnt

-- 04:59, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Vangioicnt


text:
User talk:BlueMoonset

-- 05:15, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:BlueMoonset


text:
User talk:EugenyVP

-- 05:56, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:EugenyVP


text:
User talk:DCzoczek

-- 06:08, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:DCzoczek


text:
User talk:Camoroz0

-- 06:10, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Camoroz0


text:
User talk:Anupamkundu3

-- 06:56, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Anupamkundu3


text:
User talk:Xtruzit

-- 07:04, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Xtruzit


text:
User talk:Youtops

-- 07:35, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Youtops


text:
User talk:Abir1965

-- 08:14, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Abir1965


text:
User talk:Khgoo61

-- 08:17, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Khgoo61


text:
User talk:ВСтранеЧудес

-- 08:22, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:ВСтранеЧудес


text:
User talk:Irene-Anny

-- 08:36, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Irene-Anny


text:
User talk:Muhammad hanafi95

-- 08:36, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Muhammad hanafi95


text:
User talk:CENTR - truth

-- 09:35, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:CENTR - truth


text:
User talk:Asabenn

-- 09:44, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Asabenn


text:
User talk:Amith Kulkarni

-- 09:55, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Amith Kulkarni


text:
User talk:Ilija M.

-- 09:59, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ilija M.


text:
User talk:盛鷹

-- 10:30, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:盛鷹


text:
User talk:Arowokay

-- 10:35, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Arowokay


text:
User talk:Kim31

-- 10:43, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kim31


text:
Thread:Comments:Space Shuttle Discovery lands for final time/Comments from feedback form - "brilliant!"

brilliant!


text:
User talk:Ravd0903

-- 10:45, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ravd0903


text:
User talk:Bihm11

-- 10:59, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bihm11


text:
User talk:אליהו בן אשר

-- 11:13, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:אליהו בן אשר


text:
Thread:Comments:Sheffield tram-train project back on the rails/Wrong extension?

I believe the proposed extensions in 2004, which included extensions to Broomhill and Dore, would have been more cost-effective, as (already said in the article) Rotherham currently has rail and bus links to Sheffield city.

At least this useless coalition has put hands into pockets for something though, I guess.


text:
User talk:H gibbs

-- 11:27, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:H gibbs


text:
User talk:Anupamkelkar

-- 11:44, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Anupamkelkar


text:
User talk:Hbittar

-- 11:49, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hbittar


text:
User talk:Feza Han

-- 11:54, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Feza Han


text:
User talk:Jeroen822

-- 12:21, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jeroen822


text:
User talk:LLIEBA

-- 12:39, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:LLIEBA


text:
User talk:Hmundol

-- 12:39, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hmundol


text:
User talk:Thomas son

-- 12:47, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Thomas son


text:
User talk:OurMainframe

-- 12:57, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:OurMainframe


text:
User talk:Oleanders123

-- 13:20, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Oleanders123


text:
User talk:Nanoman657

-- 13:29, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nanoman657


text:
User talk:Greencoach3

-- 13:30, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Greencoach3


text:
User talk:Hhomayun

-- 13:36, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hhomayun


text:
User talk:TRA&HSR&BUS&MRT&LRT

-- 13:44, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:TRA&HSR&BUS&MRT&LRT


text:
User talk:Martin 6176

-- 13:46, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Martin 6176


text:
User talk:Thales fraga

-- 13:50, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Thales fraga


text:
User talk:Amour 2547

-- 13:51, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Amour 2547


text:
User talk:Rueldg

-- 13:53, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rueldg


text:
User talk:Lrogers01

-- 14:01, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lrogers01


text:
User talk:愛爾思先生

-- 14:05, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:愛爾思先生


text:
User talk:Champ Nikhil

-- 14:44, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Champ Nikhil


text:
User talk:Davide 21 03 1997

-- 14:45, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Davide 21 03 1997


text:
User talk:Trika123

-- 15:04, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Trika123


text:
User talk:Starovoitov Valeriy

-- 15:10, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Starovoitov Valeriy


text:
User talk:Abbedabb

-- 15:12, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Abbedabb


text:
User talk:Qwert96

-- 15:15, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Qwert96


text:
User talk:Jackass 3d

-- 16:25, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jackass 3d


text:
User talk:Mohammed salem

-- 16:33, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mohammed salem


text:
User talk:Josebraden

-- 16:59, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Josebraden


text:
User talk:Sandra.kelly24

-- 17:02, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sandra.kelly24


text:
User talk:Worldcup007

-- 17:16, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Worldcup007


text:
User talk:Alok25

-- 17:18, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Alok25


text:
User talk:Veniceemperor

-- 17:24, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Veniceemperor


text:
User talk:Jasshamani

-- 17:34, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jasshamani


text:
User talk:Pbberg

-- 17:34, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Pbberg


text:
User talk:Ricardo123321xd

-- 17:38, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ricardo123321xd


text:
User talk:PETER LORENZ

-- 17:38, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:PETER LORENZ


text:
User talk:Vlade Krivachèine

-- 17:40, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Vlade Krivachèine


text:
User talk:Dkmanish13

-- 17:41, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dkmanish13


text:
User talk:Bruceh93

-- 17:45, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bruceh93


text:
User talk:Pasumai priyan

-- 17:46, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Pasumai priyan


text:
User talk:SubirGrewal

-- 17:58, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:SubirGrewal


text:
User talk:Noufalnishad

-- 17:58, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Noufalnishad


text:
User talk:Aharburg

-- 17:59, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Aharburg


text:
User talk:Houzlree

-- 18:04, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Houzlree


text:
User talk:DominicConnor

-- 18:09, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:DominicConnor


text:
User talk:Sondatch

-- 18:12, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sondatch


text:
User talk:Maribel Garcia Vizcaino

-- 18:15, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Maribel Garcia Vizcaino


text:
User talk:Mathieuselle

-- 18:21, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mathieuselle


text:
User talk:Gorkemkaynak

-- 18:29, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gorkemkaynak


text:
User talk:Niko30

-- 18:29, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Niko30


text: Talk:Former White House press secretary Robert Gibbs may work for Facebook


text: Comments:Former White House press secretary Robert Gibbs may work for Facebook


text:
User talk:LuoXiahong

-- 18:53, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:LuoXiahong


text:
User talk:Vujacicm

-- 18:56, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Vujacicm


text:
User talk:Imploviser

-- 18:58, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Imploviser


text:
User talk:Zdephinio

-- 19:04, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Zdephinio


text:
User talk:Leonte0605

-- 19:07, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Leonte0605


text:
User talk:Brianwhiting

-- 19:16, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Brianwhiting


text:
User talk:Gjred

-- 19:18, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gjred


text:
User talk:Cadron

-- 19:29, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Cadron


text:
User talk:Ejammies

-- 19:33, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ejammies


text:
User talk:Elsuperyova

-- 19:40, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Elsuperyova


text:
User talk:Jasonb18

-- 19:41, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jasonb18


text:
User talk:Naayf

-- 19:44, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Naayf


text:
George Clooney to be defence witness in Berlusconi sex case

March 29, 2011 Silvio Berlusconi, the Prime Minister of Italy, has announced he will call US actor George Clooney to testify at his trial.

Berlusconi is accused of having sex with an underage prostitute, Karima El Mahroug, during a party at his villa near. He has denies the charges. The Italian PM is further accused of abusing his power by intervening in a theft that Ms. Mahroug was involved in. Berlusconi attempted to evade the charges by using a recently overturned law that would leave him immune to prosecution.

Mr. Clooney and his partner, Elisabetta Canalis, were said to have been present during the February 14, 2010 party at Mr. Berlusconi's villa.

The trial is expected to begin on April 6th.


text:
User talk:Kazeezdeen

-- 19:54, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kazeezdeen


text:
User talk:Gatriahmed

-- 19:55, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gatriahmed


text:
User talk:Zen und die Kunst

-- 19:56, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Zen und die Kunst


text:
User talk:Usa10combr

-- 19:59, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Usa10combr


text:
User talk:Oknana19

-- 20:11, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Oknana19


text:
User talk:Urkle0

-- 20:14, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Urkle0


text: Comments:New York City disputes 2010 Census


text:
User talk:Orphancare2010

-- 20:35, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Orphancare2010


text:
User talk:Abrahimc

-- 20:38, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Abrahimc


text:
User talk:AManOfTomorrow

-- 20:39, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:AManOfTomorrow


text:
User talk:Chynablac

-- 20:43, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Chynablac


text:
User talk:Nitaym

-- 20:47, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nitaym


text:
User talk:Matanaloni

-- 20:47, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Matanaloni


text:
Thread:Comments:MySpace loses over ten million users in one month/Comments from feedback form - ""Internet Website?" Seriously..."

"Internet Website?" Seriously?


text:
User talk:Jafu53

-- 21:24, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jafu53


text:
User talk:Laurha

-- 21:29, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Laurha


text: Talk:British music royalties suffer first ever decrease


text: Comments:British music royalties suffer first ever decrease


text:
User talk:Yau Abdullahi

-- 21:37, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Yau Abdullahi


text:
User talk:Frank motori

-- 21:44, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Frank motori


text:
User talk:Ghoshsiddharth

-- 21:58, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ghoshsiddharth


text:
User talk:Abdi6432

-- 22:03, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Abdi6432


text:
User talk:Tahmidazuwad

-- 22:11, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tahmidazuwad


text:
User talk:Gerardbouchard862

-- 22:16, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gerardbouchard862


text:
User talk:BILL TORVALDS

-- 22:25, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:BILL TORVALDS


text:
User talk:Nickelbackrules1518

-- 22:35, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nickelbackrules1518


text:
Talk:George Clooney to be defence witness in Berlusconi sex case

Category and link
edit protected Please add this article to Category:George Clooney and localize the link of the same name. Thank you. Green Giant (talk) 12:33, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅ --Pi zero (talk) 13:06, 7 October 2015 (UTC)


text:
Comments:George Clooney to be defence witness in Berlusconi sex case

Perverts!!!


text:
User talk:Tim1337

-- 22:48, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tim1337


text: Template:Drama llama

title: Template:Drama llama


text:
User talk:Astinrainy

-- 22:57, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Astinrainy


text:
User talk:TheRetroGuy

-- 23:01, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:TheRetroGuy


text:
User talk:Juanrelokito

-- 23:06, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Juanrelokito


text:
User talk:Sas12

-- 23:13, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sas12


text:
User talk:Thewiikione

-- 23:25, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Thewiikione


text:
User talk:Carloseduardohuerta

-- 23:33, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Carloseduardohuerta


text:
Gaddafi loyalists go on offensive, rebels pushed back

March 30, 2011

Troops loyal to Libyan leader Colonel Muammar Gaddafi launched an offensive Tuesday and managed to push rebel forces out of the town of. This comes as world powers met the same day to discuss the future of the country.

Rebels disclosed that their troops in Bin Jawad came under heavy artillery and rocket fire, after which they made a hasty retreat. Rebels who were still in the open desert sought cover and fired at Gaddafi troops as they appeared. One rebel warrior said that the shelling was too much for them to handle, A rebel fighter, Ashraf Mohammed, was quoted by Reuters as saying, "[t]he Gaddafi guys hit us with Grads [rockets] and they came round our flanks."

Rebel forces retreated to the city of, which they had captured days before on Sunday, where they recuperated. However, they were not completely safe there as they came under heavy gunfire at the western fringe of town and had to defend themselves with any weapons that they could find.

Civilians also retreated from the war zone. One man criticized rebel troops, telling them to "[g]et yourselves up there and stop posing for pictures."

Today's battle marked a shift of momentum in favour of government troops; earlier this week rebels held the advantage over pro-Gaddafi forces as they made their westward march with little to no resistance.


text:
User:Tempodivalse/Competition/Reminder

 }}

title: User:Tempodivalse/Competition/Reminder


text:
User talk:Galagem

-- 00:17, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Galagem


text:
User talk:Zanejin

-- 00:21, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Zanejin


text:
BP lose laptop containing sensitive claimant data

March 30, 2011

Oil company BP has reportedly lost a laptop containing the personal information of approximately 13,000 people who filed claims against the company following the Deepwater Horizon disaster last year.

Tom Mueller, a spokesperson for the company, confirmed they had written to "individuals impacted by this event to inform them about the loss of their personal data and to offer them free credit monitoring services to help protect their personal information." Mueller said the laptop was lost during "routine business travel," and was reported to have the ability to be deactivated remotely.

BP refused to comment about the employee who lost the laptop. The data on the laptop contained the names, addresses,, phone numbers and the dates of birth of claimants, which was unencrypted even though the laptop itself is protected by a password.

The data on the laptop concerned claimants against the company after one of its oil platforms in the Gulf of Mexico exploded, sending up to 4.9 million barrels of oil into the ocean, which eventually reached the southern U.S. coastline.

One resident affected by the the oil disaster and the lost laptop expressed his outrage at BP when interviewed by. "It's terrible, I kinda work hard for the things I have," he said. "I wouldn't want somebody with a computer to be able to take it from me. It's very disturbing. It's like another gallon of gas thrown on the fire."


text:
User talk:GuruAzteca

-- 00:40, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:GuruAzteca


text:
User talk:Kmecholsky

-- 01:02, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kmecholsky


text:
User talk:Santinal98

-- 01:04, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Santinal98


text:
User talk:Latvian-arrows

-- 01:09, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Latvian-arrows


text:
User talk:Shramkon

-- 01:10, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Shramkon


text:
User talk:Sofinemikis

-- 01:19, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sofinemikis


text:
User talk:Niyasm

-- 01:25, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Niyasm


text:
Thread:Comments:MySpace loses over ten million users in one month/Myspace Good Bye!/reply

I am not surprised that they are dying. It's full of spam and everyone has relocated to Facebook.


text:
User talk:Gangdoremon

-- 01:38, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gangdoremon


text:
User talk:Boundtoyou

-- 01:41, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Boundtoyou


text:
User talk:Abegertler

-- 01:43, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Abegertler


text:
User talk:WikiEditMJL14

-- 01:49, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:WikiEditMJL14


text:
User talk:Danielisnottheumbrellagod

-- 02:04, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Danielisnottheumbrellagod


text:
User:Fabsouza1

 * Ok

title: User:Fabsouza1


text:
User talk:Fabsouza1

Discussão: ok

title: User talk:Fabsouza1


text: Comments:Gaddafi loyalists go on offensive, rebels pushed back


text: Talk:Gaddafi loyalists go on offensive, rebels pushed back


text:
User talk:Sreejan

-- 02:44, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sreejan


text: Talk:Forces loyal to Ouattara plan to seal Ivory Coast border


text: Comments:Forces loyal to Ouattara plan to seal Ivory Coast border


text:
User talk:TartarTorte

-- 03:18, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:TartarTorte


text:
User:Tempodivalse/User interaction policy

This page outlines basic principles that users should adhere to when interacting with others. Writing news can sometimes be stressful due to the deadlines involved, so users can become frustrated or upset more easily than on a more time-neutral project such as Wikipedia or Wikibooks. However, there are still certain standards to follow to ensure continued cooperation and productivity.

Personal attacks
A personal attack, known in logic as ad hominem, is a negative comment aimed not at a user's argument or opinion, but at some personal trait of the user himself, usually with the purpose of discrediting the user.

Obvious insults making little or no attempt at constructive criticism classify as personal attacks (e.g. "Your contributions were utter garbage!"), but other things falling into this category include negative/derogatory remarks made about one's beliefs, physical characteristics, and accusations about personal behaviour (e.g. "Of course you're biased, you're a Mormon!"), when irrelevant to the issue at hand. When in doubt: comment on the content, not the user.

Remember, personal attacks don't help anyone and only reflect badly on the user making the attack. They should be avoided because they are incompatible with a productive, cooperative and focussed atmosphere that Wikinews needs in order to function well.

Enforcement
All editors are strongly encouraged to comply with the above guidelines. Nobody, from newbies to established editors, should be exempted from respecting others.

Extreme, hostile, and flagrant violations crossing any threshold of acceptability may result in an immediate block, but the user making the attacks should generally be informed of this policy first and requested to tone down discussion. A block of at least 24 hours will be applied if the user does not attempt to be more respectful (although it can be increased at an admin's discretion). Repeated personal attacks and rudeness after previous blocks can result in immediate revocation of editing privileges with prejudice, escalating to an indefinite block after several offenses or with community consensus.

Feeding the trolls
Occasionally you may run across obvious trolls who are clearly here only to vandalise and disrupt the community. Such users should of course be blocked, but refrain from lashing out at them with sneers or insults. Rather, the vandal should be blocked immediately and his edits removed in a professional manner. Most trolls want to see you get angry and upset; you can actually frustrate them more by not taking the bait. Additionally, this method makes them a minimal distraction by not drawing any attention to them, allowing you to return back to the goal of improving Wikinews. The vandal in question, seeing that nobody is reacting to his bait, may give up more quickly.


text:
Wikinews:Accreditation requests/Phearson

Successful accreditation request. Diego Grez return fire 21:26, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Phearson (talk)

 * Name: [redacted]
 * Location: Locals are NYC, NJ, and PA
 * Areas of interest: Technology, Activism, Disasters, Crime, Politics (strict NPOV)
 * Reason: I desire accreditation for access to areas for the use of the press media, and access to court hearings and disaster areas (if one should occur)
 * Accomplishments: Published 3 (+1 in peer) articles on Wikinews, in which two have made the front page, and have contributed several Audio Versions, and have received praise on both talk page and IRC. I also am proud of my work on EN Wikipedia, including the Essay w:WP:PEW, which I intend to present rewritten as a guideline later in the year.
 * Contact information: Skype Name: [redacted]
 * User ID: 253394
 * Applied on: 03:25, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

After discussion on IRC, I know of three users who will support my request for accreditation. I would have not bothered if otherwise. I also plan on purchasing external audio equipment to use during interviews for ORs. For your consideration, Phearson (talk) 03:25, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
 * NOTE: Because I live with others, I fear retribution in case someone looks up my IRL name if I publish something they don't like. I will be more then happy to provide ID to the foundation. Phearson (talk) 03:39, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Comments, Questions

 * What types of OR interviews do you plan on doing? --Patrick M (TUFKAAP) (talk) 03:51, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Reply: Any willing candidate for the upcoming 2012 elections (politics), Tea Party activists or any Activists in the area (activism) A/DA's and criminals/accused (crime) and etc. Phearson (talk) 04:15, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

 * How do you plan on giving said ID to the foundation? --Patrick M (TUFKAAP) (talk) 03:51, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Reply Because the policy is not clear in regards to this particular area, I have left a note on User talk:brianmc requesting clarification. Now moot as I have given my real name. Phearson (talk) 00:35, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Votes

 * Xe may be new and below the threshold, but frankly, I don't give a damn. Talking with xyr on IRC, xe seems very willing to contribute and I feel xe will use and not abuse xyrs credentials. I'd be very glad to have interviews with full audio. So Phearson, you have my blessing. :) --Patrick M (TUFKAAP) (talk) 03:51, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
 * - The published articles look great, a lot of work and a good clear understanding of style and layout. The audio articles are a big plus, good quality, clearly read and spot on.  I'm with TUFKAAP on this one. Forget the threshold, this user deserves accreditation right off the bat. BarkingFish (talk) 04:01, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
 * —I expect this user's work can only improve through OR, and that he will not misuse his accreditation. DEN  DODGE  15:02, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Get reviewer too. Diego Grez return fire 21:19, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
 * He's an excellent writer with a lot of ambition and obvious motivation. I say let him contribute! --Anthony M

__NOINDEX__


text:
User talk:Fjptlinli

-- 03:44, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Fjptlinli


text:
User talk:Maxlead-mia

-- 03:46, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Maxlead-mia


text:
Talk:BP lose laptop containing sensitive claimant data

Review of revision 1204561 [Failed]

 * Special software: Cnn article, 4th paragraph, "The loss of the laptop, which can be remotely disabled", Will have that rephrased because I was assuming they had LoJack. Phearson (talk) 04:35, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

 * ENWiki on the article listed, makes that claim of the amount of oil spilled. I have added the ref from there to here. Phearson (talk) 04:41, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The ref format is never used on Wikinews articles.
 * Wikipedia is not considered a reliable source; you may, from there, lift the source they cite - provided it is accessible and you have verified it backs you up.
 * This could do with far more use of active voice. --Brian McNeil / talk 06:39, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The error has been fixed. Though I am at a lost to what exactly needs to be active. Phearson (talk) 12:13, 30 March 2011 (UTC)


text:
User talk:Mathew105601

-- 04:32, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mathew105601


text:
User talk:MalteseRod

-- 04:53, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:MalteseRod


text:
US President Obama considering supplying arms to Libyan rebels

March 31, 2011

United States Barack Obama revealed Tuesday that he is considering supplying arms to Libyan rebels, among other things. Obama was quoted as saying, "if we [USA] wanted to get weapons into Libya, we probably could."

During an interview with , Obama disclosed he is, "not ruling it out. But I'm also not ruling it in. We're still making an assessment partly about what Gaddafi's forces are going to be doing." Obama also informed that he would be willing to negotiate a deal with Gaddafi; however, one clause would involve Gadaffi resigning from the leadership post.

Obama does not believe it is time for formal negotiations yet as he does not think Gaddafi has reached the point where he needs a quick way out.

Also mentioned in the interview was the strategy being used in Libya. "What we've also done is put Gaddafi back on his heels — at this point. In addition to maintaining a no-fly zone, protecting civilian populations, we also have political tools, diplomatic tools, sanctions, freezing his assets, all of which continue to tighten the noose."

Obama reiterated that same view on  saying in an interview, "I think what we're seeing is that the circle around Gaddafi understands that the noose is tightening, that their days are probably numbered, and they are going to have to think through what their next steps are."

Meanwhile, in an interview with , Obama said of the rebels leaders that U.S. officials have met with are "[F]ully vetted, so we have a clear sense of who they are, and so far they're saying the right things, and most of them are professionals, lawyers, doctors, people who appear to be credible."

This comes after the supreme commander, Admiral  said there were "flickers" of  and  in Libya. In response, Obama said on CBS, "[T]hat doesn't mean that all the people, among all the people who opposed Qaddafi, there might not be elements that are unfriendly to the United States and our interests. That's why I think it's important for us not to jump in with both feet."

As for the rebels themselves, Mahmoud Shammam, a spokesman for the rebels told the , "We ask for political support more than arms, but if we have both, that would be good."


text:
User talk:Reidmachel

-- 05:21, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Reidmachel


text:
User talk:Prasha Technologies

-- 05:32, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Prasha Technologies


text:
User talk:SEO-masterr

-- 05:50, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:SEO-masterr


text:
User talk:Vladimirka

-- 06:02, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Vladimirka


text:
User talk:Ravikrishnani

-- 06:30, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ravikrishnani


text:
User talk:Laeliinae

-- 06:32, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Laeliinae


text:
Thread:Comments:British music royalties suffer first ever decrease/This has nothing...

...to do with piracy. If a CD is worth buying and people are financially able to buy it then they will buy it. And if an artist is put off from producing music because there's less money in it then there's a simple solution: don't bother. Leave it to the people who have their heart in it.


text:
User talk:OlivierMehani

-- 06:45, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:OlivierMehani


text:
User talk:Nariman09

-- 06:48, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nariman09


text:
User talk:DMKO

-- 07:00, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:DMKO


text:
User talk:MAX4MPAK

-- 07:21, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:MAX4MPAK


text:
User talk:Møllgaard

-- 07:36, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Møllgaard


text:
User talk:Arslan khalid

-- 07:36, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Arslan khalid


text:
User talk:Helenkeit

-- 07:50, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Helenkeit


text:
User talk:Kuldeep Dhanuka

-- 07:50, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kuldeep Dhanuka


text:
User talk:Awesome me

-- 07:55, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Awesome me


text:
User talk:DinRizan89

-- 08:10, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:DinRizan89


text:
User talk:ItsmeCristinaDL

-- 08:11, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:ItsmeCristinaDL


text:
User talk:Ihsan363

-- 08:24, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ihsan363


text:
User talk:Žalias asilėlis

-- 08:35, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Žalias asilėlis


text:
User talk:Dlqmdl1990

-- 08:43, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dlqmdl1990


text:
User talk:Jsung123

-- 08:45, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jsung123


text:
User talk:Broosk

-- 09:06, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Broosk


text:
User talk:呼噜呼噜猫

-- 09:10, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:呼噜呼噜猫


text:
User talk:Vitrubius32

-- 09:14, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Vitrubius32


text:
User talk:Evaristé93

-- 09:20, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Evaristé93


text:
User talk:Tjf532

-- 09:20, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tjf532


text:
User talk:Svmiros

-- 09:22, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Svmiros


text:
User talk:Bylapudi Mohan

-- 09:36, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bylapudi Mohan


text:
User talk:Panlaanferdinand

-- 09:39, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Panlaanferdinand


text:
User talk:Mht19

-- 09:55, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mht19


text:
User talk:SteveNobel

-- 09:58, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:SteveNobel


text:
User talk:Mvvendrell

-- 09:59, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mvvendrell


text:
User talk:Mrfair

-- 10:03, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mrfair


text:
User talk:Fesuyala

-- 10:12, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Fesuyala


text:
User talk:Permian

-- 10:13, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Permian


text:
User talk:Nunolazevedo

-- 10:14, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nunolazevedo


text:
User talk:Badran 159

-- 10:23, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Badran 159


text:
User talk:Kokorichan

-- 11:01, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kokorichan


text:
User talk:Willwm

-- 11:08, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Willwm


text:
User talk:ZeLonewolf

-- 11:10, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:ZeLonewolf


text:
User talk:Pasqualeiannucci

-- 11:26, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Pasqualeiannucci


text:
User talk:Mohind vm

-- 11:31, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mohind vm


text:
User talk:Kuzo Pile

-- 11:46, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kuzo Pile


text:
User talk:Kbvsvc

-- 12:19, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kbvsvc


text:
User talk:Lwb1993

-- 12:21, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lwb1993


text:
User talk:CCMO mutuelle

-- 12:25, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:CCMO mutuelle


text:
User talk:Tatsnsejr~enwikinews

-- 12:37, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Tatsnsejr. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Tatsnsejr~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:35, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:37, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tatsnsejr~enwikinews


text:
User talk:Dr kabuto

-- 12:41, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dr kabuto


text:
User talk:Mr. Zeal

-- 12:47, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mr. Zeal


text:
User talk:HHDI

-- 12:59, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:HHDI


text:
User talk:Emanuele1212

-- 13:09, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Emanuele1212


text:
User talk:Revbert

-- 13:14, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Revbert


text:
User talk:Blas3nik

-- 13:14, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Blas3nik