text:
User talk:Netadnan

-- 00:41, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Re: your writing about Syria
Hi, Netadnan. My name is BarkingFish, and I'm an administrator with en.wikinews. I'm really sorry to have to tell you, but your work which you added about Syria has had to be "oversighted" - this means that the work has been deleted, and the revisions have been removed entirely from our database. The reason for this is that you added what we call "Inappropriate personal information" to the work - you posted your personal home address on it. We don't allow this, because it could lead to a risk to your personal privacy. You're welcome to resubmit what you wrote, but please don't put any personally identifiable information, such as your address or email address in the work. Thank you for your understanding, and sorry for the inconvenience. BarkingFish (talk) 01:46, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Netadnan


text:
User talk:Superfifi83097

-- 00:43, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: User talk:Superfifi83097


text:
User talk:Mysoccernum11

-- 00:51, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mysoccernum11


text:
User talk:Spacewrangler1988

-- 01:57, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Spacewrangler1988


text:
User talk:Ramanaraavi

-- 02:34, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ramanaraavi


text:
User talk:Stephenfwhitmore

-- 02:34, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Stephenfwhitmore


text:
User talk:SirCadogon4

-- 03:14, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:SirCadogon4


text:
User talk:Lennyr777

-- 03:27, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lennyr777


text:
User talk:Balddricks

-- 04:08, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Balddricks


text:
User talk:Dotiensi78

-- 04:34, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dotiensi78


text:
User talk:Donaldeus

-- 04:51, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Donaldeus


text:
User talk:Onlythee

-- 05:17, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Onlythee


text:
User talk:Akashchopra214

-- 05:24, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Akashchopra214


text:
User talk:Ephemthe

-- 05:26, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ephemthe


text:
User talk:Weweedmaniii

-- 05:38, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Weweedmaniii


text:
Thread:Comments:Trump criticizes media bias towards Obama, especially during UK state visit/Crucial quote I missed

When Obama finished his speech and raised his glass to the Queen, you can faintly hear the Queen telling him, "First the anthem." Due to the time limit, however, it looks like I can't add that crucial piece of info into the article. But I just want to mention this, in case curious readers want to glean as much info as possible about this delicate conflict between the Queen's adherence to protocol and the President's desire to finish his speech.


text:
User talk:Maarten Jansen

-- 05:55, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Maarten Jansen


text:
User talk:Tlele

-- 06:11, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tlele


text:
User talk:Billysuite

-- 06:13, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Billysuite


text:
User talk:About India Herbs

-- 07:03, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:About India Herbs


text:
User talk:Supriya Srivatsa

-- 07:04, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Supriya Srivatsa


text:
User talk:Mrtien

-- 07:12, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mrtien


text:
User talk:0zhencheng

-- 07:33, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:0zhencheng


text:
User talk:Threex lp

-- 07:42, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Threex lp


text:
User talk:Uladak

-- 07:43, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Uladak


text:
User talk:Muciek1208

-- 07:58, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Muciek1208


text:
User talk:Goutown

-- 08:07, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Goutown


text:
User talk:Intruder007

-- 08:11, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Intruder007


text:
User talk:Harshul4444

-- 08:16, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Harshul4444


text:
User talk:Abraham kamanga

-- 08:19, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Abraham kamanga


text:
User talk:Brugigi

-- 08:44, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Brugigi


text:
User talk:Mocomoconek

-- 08:50, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mocomoconek


text:
User talk:Parths301301301

-- 08:53, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Parths301301301


text:
User talk:Bryan dfg

-- 09:07, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bryan dfg


text:
User talk:Mabaezd

-- 09:39, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mabaezd


text:
User talk:O fenomeno

-- 10:25, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:O fenomeno


text:
User talk:Mamma desimalia

-- 10:36, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mamma desimalia


text:
User talk:Ängelsberg

-- 11:02, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ängelsberg


text:
User talk:احمد صفوان

-- 11:05, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:احمد صفوان


text:
User talk:Rafa.00001

-- 11:30, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rafa.00001


text:
User talk:AnchitJain1234

-- 11:36, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:AnchitJain1234


text:
User talk:Arun Kumar Gupta

-- 11:45, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Arun Kumar Gupta


text:
User talk:Telu srinivasarao

-- 11:54, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Telu srinivasarao


text:
User talk:Dimok98

-- 11:59, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dimok98


text:
User talk:ShiningALight

-- 12:09, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:ShiningALight


text:
User talk:Warkocur

-- 12:17, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Warkocur


text:
User talk:Erdyizm

-- 12:32, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Erdyizm


text:
User talk:Sherifzorkani

-- 12:45, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sherifzorkani


text:
User talk:JenniBee

-- 12:47, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:JenniBee


text:
User talk:4mediosaintcharles

-- 12:54, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:4mediosaintcharles


text:
User talk:Ahbrahim2

-- 13:05, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ahbrahim2


text:
User talk:Gabriel Marçal RockMetal

-- 13:06, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gabriel Marçal RockMetal


text:
User talk:Sabar prayitno

-- 13:09, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sabar prayitno


text:
User talk:Jomonmm

-- 13:11, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jomonmm


text:
User talk:Conrad~enwikinews

-- 13:15, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Conrad. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Conrad~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:13, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:30, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Conrad~enwikinews


text:
User talk:Nakohdo

-- 13:16, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nakohdo


text:
User talk:Saleem shahzad

-- 13:17, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Saleem shahzad


text:
User talk:Hoanganhkhoil

-- 13:34, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hoanganhkhoil


text:
User talk:Kitchastat

-- 13:37, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kitchastat


text:
User talk:Indira mega

-- 13:55, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Indira mega


text:
User talk:Ramajois

-- 13:58, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ramajois


text:
Thread:Comments:Ekansh on odd perfect number/Comments from feedback form - "good"

good —116.202.128.150 (talk) 13:59, 10 June 2011 (UTC)


text:
User talk:Orchidproject

-- 14:02, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Orchidproject


text:
Eritrea accuses four Britons of espionage and terrorism

June 11, 2011

The government of Eritrea has accused four British men who were detained last December of espionage and terrorism. The men were working for Protection Vessels International (PVI), a maritime security company, when they disappeared on December 24, 2010. According to the company, the group was forced to make an unscheduled stop at the port of due to rough weather, refuelling and equipment repairs.

A statement made on television by the Eritrean authorities said that the men had a variety of weapons, including 18 sniper rifles and "1,700 bullets." The statement also claimed that "there is high possibility that such military hardware is intended for perpetrating acts of terrorism and sabotage." PVI hit back at the claims, saying that the weapons were "standard issue for antipiracy operations."

Paul Gibbins, a spokesman for PVI, spoke to the British newspaper , saying "[t]his is a gross misunderstanding and we regret the situation that we find ourselves in. We will continue to work very hard for the men’s release and we welcome any dialogue with the Eritrean authorities."

Two of the four men being held are former. Three of the men have been named as Adrian Troy, Christopher Collison, and Alun Sims.


text:
User talk:Rafael Zarmiento

-- 14:02, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rafael Zarmiento


text:
User talk:V Karnaukh

-- 14:14, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:V Karnaukh


text:
User talk:Nbmanuel18

-- 14:19, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nbmanuel18


text:
User talk:Peter2oboke

-- 14:35, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Peter2oboke


text:
User talk:UncleMartin

-- 14:50, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:UncleMartin


text:
User talk:Conner.sherline

-- 14:53, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Conner.sherline


text:
User talk:Umontholath

-- 15:07, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Umontholath


text:
User talk:Amirmobarak25

-- 15:07, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Amirmobarak25


text:
User talk:Slashtag

-- 15:09, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Slashtag


text:
User talk:Giovani90

-- 15:13, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Giovani90


text:
User talk:Jaedon alves da silva

-- 15:14, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jaedon alves da silva


text:
User talk:Leniivrenii

-- 15:21, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Leniivrenii


text:
User talk:Baletrix

-- 15:49, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Baletrix


text:
User talk:Dajjaal

-- 15:53, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dajjaal


text:
User talk:Mohinimohan Pal

-- 16:19, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mohinimohan Pal


text:
User talk:Suetorp

-- 16:19, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Suetorp


text:
User talk:Sybilledeb

-- 16:23, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sybilledeb


text:
User talk:Paraguaytkd

-- 16:24, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Paraguaytkd


text:
User talk:Wtahir19

-- 16:27, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Wtahir19


text:
Thread:Comments:Chilean deputy's 'homophobic' comment on Facebook causes controversy/controversy?/reply

I get what you mean but that's OK when friends call each other names, but you can't call a random homosexual a queer some take it offensive to it or calling a random Jew a "bitch ass Jew". "You treat people how you want to be treated".


text:
Thread:Comments:New Internet addresses tested on World IPv6 Day/Good news everyone./reply

Yes this is wonderful news. :)


text:
Thread:Comments:LulzSec attacks Nintendo server/Waiting for the inevitable/reply (8)

Well at least Nintendo didn't get screwed like Sony.XD LOL


text:
User talk:S. Md. Faraz Zaidi

-- 17:02, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:S. Md. Faraz Zaidi


text:
User talk:Nemuribeef

-- 17:04, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nemuribeef


text:
Thread:Comments:Chilean deputy's 'homophobic' comment on Facebook causes controversy/controversy?/reply (2)

If you cannot call a homosexual a "queer" then call him a SHITPUMPER cause that's what they are. 156.8.251.250 (talk) 17:10, 10 June 2011 (UTC)


text:
User talk:Kattcat59

-- 17:14, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kattcat59


text:
User talk:Niotsuki

-- 17:17, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Niotsuki


text:
Thread:Comments:Chilean deputy's 'homophobic' comment on Facebook causes controversy/controversy?/reply (3)

Yeah....You can't call homosexual that ether, but do it really matter if a person is homosexual or Heterosexuality.People need to learn to accept homosexual cause it not going anywhere.


text:
User talk:Popopo7

-- 18:17, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Popopo7


text:
User talk:Ross2166

-- 18:26, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ross2166


text:
User talk:Montherdez

-- 18:47, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Montherdez


text:
User talk:Saldim

-- 18:53, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Saldim


text:
User talk:Mfmllh

-- 18:54, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mfmllh


text:
User talk:SoccerJoe1

-- 18:58, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:SoccerJoe1


text:
User talk:Cscheidegger

-- 19:08, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Cscheidegger


text:
User talk:Sohailkabir

-- 19:19, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sohailkabir


text:
User talk:נטע

-- 20:02, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:נטע


text:
User talk:Theophilec

-- 20:03, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Theophilec


text:
User talk:Rinaldi.andrea

-- 20:35, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rinaldi.andrea


text:
User talk:Szymekbrw

-- 20:39, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Szymekbrw


text:
User talk:Dalv97

-- 20:45, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dalv97


text:
User talk:Xjhdmskyjxhcd

-- 20:47, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Xjhdmskyjxhcd


text:
Somali interior minister killed by bomb attack in own home

June 11, 2011

, the interior minister of Somalia, was killed in a bomb attack at his home in Mogadishu on Friday. The suicide bomber was a veiled woman said to be his teenage niece and a member of the militant al-Shabab, an Islamic group. According to the BBC, his niece was a frequent visitor and no security check was performed. She was killed instantly and the minister died on his way to treatment.

This is the third suicide attack in as many weeks in Somalia's capital city.

Senior police chief Nur Farah said he believed that a second bomb may have been placed under Hassan's bed. He said to that "[t]he minister was killed by a relative from inside his house, it was unfortunate and unexpected. A big bomb must have been put under the minister's bed. The explosives on the suicide bomber could not destroy the concrete room that way."

Ahmed Mohamed, the minister's driver spoke about the attack, saying that "[s]uddenly, I heard a loud explosion. I saw the flesh of the suicide bomber in the balcony near the minister's house. I went into his room and saw him lying injured."

At the time of the attack Mogadishu, as well as other parts of Somalia, have been hit with two days of political protests. Citizens have been protesting against a deal to extend the of the parliament and President.


text:
User talk:Grandmik

-- 21:15, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Grandmik


text:
User talk:Pwrhea

-- 21:26, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Pwrhea


text:
User talk:Herarobfe

-- 21:46, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Herarobfe


text:
User talk:Abudhabi777

-- 21:46, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Abudhabi777


text:
Thread:Comments:Chilean deputy's 'homophobic' comment on Facebook causes controversy/controversy?/reply (4)

Chile is, still, a very conservative country. Most people, I can say, are homophobe over here. If you see a transvestite in the streets of certain small town, people may think "they are such dirty people," because the country itself is not prepared to an acceptation of the homosexuals. Just look it up, even President Sebastián Piñera has said he isn't supporting the gay marriage, and this other conservative deputy, Mr. Estay. That's the problem, Chile isn't prepared for the "queers". By the way, the Chilean homosexuals, transgender, and bisexuals, are all IMHO überly-sensitive, but yet again I reiterate, Chile's just a conservative country, and it'll still be for some time.


text:
User talk:Jamesgarfield1022

-- 21:55, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jamesgarfield1022


text:
User talk:Swharr

-- 22:26, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Swharr


text:
User talk:Slatz-123

-- 22:35, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Slatz-123


text:
User talk:ShaneDG

-- 22:52, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:ShaneDG


text:
User talk:Domiken

-- 22:56, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Domiken


text:
User talk:Chuuktv

-- 23:23, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Chuuktv


text:
User talk:Desoto80

-- 00:06, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Desoto80


text:
User talk:Fexcii

-- 00:06, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Fexcii


text:
Thread:Comments:Skype suffers downtime in Europe/Skype problem suggested may be related to news of 70mn user ID's compromised difficulties?.

I simply wonder if this problem may be related to earlier news that some 70 million or more user identities and probably passwords has been compromised by some invasion tactics developed by some nefarious body, means a lot of security remedial work needs be done?


text:
Thread:Comments:Skype suffers downtime in Europe/Skype problem suggested may be related to news of 70mn user ID's compromised difficulties?./reply

Do you have any link to that, so I can take some effort to reply to this question?


text:
Thread:Comments:Chilean deputy's 'homophobic' comment on Facebook causes controversy/Comments from feedback form - "I do think his explanation to ..."

I do think his explanation to MOVILH was reasonable and shows support for their integration & Liberation of our type causes. But then he is a Politician and must seek votes from all sides of the equation.


text: Comments:Eritrea accuses four Britons of espionage and terrorism


text: Talk:Eritrea accuses four Britons of espionage and terrorism


text: Talk:Somali interior minister killed by bomb attack in own home


text: Comments:Somali interior minister killed by bomb attack in own home


text:
User talk:Pb8bije6a7b6a3w

-- 01:09, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Pb8bije6a7b6a3w


text:
User talk:Travis.m.granvold

-- 01:09, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Travis.m.granvold


text:
User talk:Romina Peralta

-- 01:19, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Romina Peralta


text:
Up to 31 reported dead as Libyan government troops attack Misrata

June 12, 2011

Pro-Muammar al-Gaddafi forces attacked Libya's third-largest city of for much of Friday, killing up to 31 rebel fighters in the most violent day since the city came under rebel control in April.

Most of the fighting took place just west of the city, where Gaddafi's troops launched an attack with both infantry troops and four tanks, as well as lighter weaponry, such as rockets and mortars. Rebel fighters were reportedly able to repel the assault, destroying two tanks and advancing by about 6 miles (9.7 kilometres).

Estimates of those killed by the fighting varied from as low as 22 to as high as 31, with up to 60 more reported injured, according to doctors in Misrata, making Friday the deadliest day for rebel troops since they gained control of the city.

The new assault appears to be in response to NATO helicopter attacks against Gaddafi.

While NATO aircraft attacked both communications and military equipment on Thursday night, there were no strikes by coalition aircraft during the fighting on Friday. One rebel fighter said: "I don't know why NATO didn't bomb. [The tanks] were very easy to see." While NATO has been criticized by rebels for failing to provide support, one unnamed official said that NATO is "in Libya to protect civilians. The rebels have proved themselves to be very courageous but we are not there to act as their air force."


text:
User talk:Scott0962

-- 01:30, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Scott0962


text:
User talk:MN.Gruber06

-- 01:39, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:MN.Gruber06


text:
User talk:Albertomansep

-- 01:43, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Albertomansep


text:
User talk:Rogue33

-- 01:50, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rogue33


text:
User talk:Thunderstone99

-- 02:04, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Thunderstone99


text:
User talk:Đặng xuân oanh

-- 02:04, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Đặng xuân oanh


text:
User talk:DrZakFlex

-- 02:15, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:DrZakFlex


text:
User talk:Mannupedia

-- 02:30, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mannupedia


text:
Thread:Comments:Eritrea accuses four Britons of espionage and terrorism/Where are they being held?

Can someone clear this up for me, since it did not explicitly say in the article, are the 4 men being held in Eritrea or in the UK?


text:
User talk:Brayan aldair ortiz mejia

-- 03:13, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Brayan aldair ortiz mejia


text:
User talk:EMCA999

-- 03:58, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:EMCA999


text:
User talk:AlphonseWiki

-- 04:02, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:AlphonseWiki


text:
User talk:CafeNokia

-- 04:20, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:CafeNokia


text:
User talk:Ozaklad

-- 04:22, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ozaklad


text:
User talk:Ylang ylang2308

-- 04:32, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ylang ylang2308


text:
User talk:Parthdu

-- 04:47, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Parthdu


text:
User talk:Tiazlife

-- 04:51, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tiazlife


text:
User talk:K.s.sujith

-- 04:52, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:K.s.sujith


text:
User talk:RoyFreeway

-- 04:58, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:RoyFreeway


text:
User talk:Iiaggo

-- 04:59, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Iiaggo


text:
User talk:Rodger-Xie

-- 05:29, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rodger-Xie


text:
User talk:Nirbinirbi

-- 05:29, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nirbinirbi


text:
User talk:Juleoni

-- 05:31, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Juleoni


text:
User talk:Ouch.jars

-- 05:36, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ouch.jars


text:
User talk:Srinivasandtt

-- 05:38, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Srinivasandtt


text:
User talk:Surachat daengdong

-- 05:42, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Surachat daengdong


text:
User talk:Morrisha

-- 06:41, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Morrisha


text:
User talk:Billertl~enwikinews

-- 06:55, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Billertl. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Billertl~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:12, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:29, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Billertl~enwikinews


text:
User talk:Rewin0087

-- 06:58, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rewin0087


text:
User talk:Adelida71

-- 07:04, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Adelida71


text:
User talk:Oncelchen

-- 07:07, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Oncelchen


text:
User talk:Deepanshugarg0707

-- 07:10, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Deepanshugarg0707


text:
User talk:Violarulez

-- 07:37, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Violarulez


text:
User talk:Valmirao

-- 07:59, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Valmirao


text:
User talk:Stuartpb

-- 08:08, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Stuartpb


text:
User talk:Spursoli1

-- 08:12, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Spursoli1


text:
User talk:Farwestcowboy 2409

-- 08:32, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Farwestcowboy 2409


text:
User talk:Thequyentk

-- 08:45, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Thequyentk


text:
User talk:XivioiLiam

-- 09:21, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:XivioiLiam


text:
User talk:Wikflora

-- 09:32, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Wikflora


text:
User talk:Jannisking

-- 09:42, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jannisking


text:
User talk:M.Costantino

-- 09:52, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:M.Costantino


text:
User talk:Akash7321

-- 09:55, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Akash7321


text:
User talk:ToniSel

-- 10:16, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:ToniSel


text:
User talk:Slowpoke0303

-- 10:18, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Slowpoke0303


text:
User talk:Linzhihao886

-- 10:30, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Linzhihao886


text:
User talk:Charles.doley

-- 10:43, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Charles.doley


text:
User talk:Sandman19681012

-- 10:51, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sandman19681012


text:
User talk:Cyclejackson

-- 11:06, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Cyclejackson


text:
User talk:Bargem

-- 11:09, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bargem


text:
User talk:Nzara

-- 11:26, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nzara


text:
User talk:Adarshsrajan

-- 11:46, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Adarshsrajan


text:
User talk:Mayell

-- 11:55, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mayell


text:
User talk:АККУПАТ

-- 12:13, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:АККУПАТ


text:
User talk:Aperture2011

-- 12:25, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Aperture2011


text:
User talk:瓢箪庵宗匠

-- 12:26, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:瓢箪庵宗匠


text:
User talk:Clarkshark

-- 12:31, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Clarkshark


text:
User talk:VideoRanger2525~enwikinews

-- 12:37, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called VideoRanger2525. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name VideoRanger2525~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:37, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:40, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:VideoRanger2525~enwikinews


text:
User talk:Lenzal

-- 12:39, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lenzal


text:
User talk:贊拿斯

-- 12:53, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:贊拿斯


text:
User talk:Booklung

-- 12:55, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Booklung


text:
User talk:Ma000158

-- 12:55, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ma000158


text:
User talk:Haritha.k.r

-- 12:57, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Haritha.k.r


text:
User talk:Adamaz1

-- 13:21, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Adamaz1


text:
User talk:Edvard Norton

-- 13:42, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Edvard Norton


text:
User talk:Mark Shaw

-- 13:43, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mark Shaw


text:
User talk:Yabukarma

-- 13:47, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Yabukarma


text:
User talk:Delllaptop2011

-- 13:59, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Delllaptop2011


text:
User talk:Raiza lima do nascimento

-- 14:10, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Raiza lima do nascimento


text:
User talk:Motiful

-- 14:22, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Motiful


text:
User talk:Mohammad0568254100

-- 14:22, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mohammad0568254100


text:
User talk:Luckydocwiki

-- 14:24, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Luckydocwiki


text:
Thread:Comments:Barack Obama announces 2012 re-election bid/Comments from feedback form - "screw you obama."/reply (2)

-1


text:
User talk:Obakfahad

-- 14:44, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Obakfahad


text:
User talk:Emiliokun5

-- 14:49, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Emiliokun5


text:
Wikinews interviews US National Archives Wikipedian in Residence

June 30, 2011

Dominic McDevitt-Parks, a prolific contributor to Wikipedia and a graduate student in history and archives management, agreed to answer a few questions about his new role as "" at the US.

"Wikipedians in Residence" are volunteers placed with institutions, such as museums and libraries, to facilitate use of those institutions' resources on Wikipedia.

According to a report, 42 percent of Americans use Wikipedia as an online source of information. The online, collaborative encyclopedia boasts more than 3.5 million articles in English and versions in over 250 languages. Given the website's vast readership, the has proclaimed himself "a big fan of Wikipedia" and emphasizes the need for the National Archives to work with the project. The Archives posted the internship listing in March, expressing its desire for an employee who "will work as a community coordinator and strengthen the relationship between the Archives and the Wikipedian community through a range of activities".

McDevitt-Parks, who describes himself as a "history buff, a word nerd, a news junkie and an occasional pedant," is a 24-year-old graduate student at in Boston. On Wikipedia, he has contributed for more than seven years under the username "Dominic", his work focusing mostly on Latin American history.

He began his work at the Archives in late May, and since then he has undertaken numerous projects, including uploading onto Wikipedia 200 photos taken by for the. Although those photos have always remained in the public domain, accessing their high-definition versions could be problematic. Researchers who wanted to view the files had to visit the Archives facilities in, Maryland.

McDevitt-Parks is also preparing a "" on Wikipedia, where works featured as "Today's Document" on the Archives' website are also the main focus of newly written or expanded encyclopedia articles displayed on Wikipedia's home page. The first — and so far only — winner of the challenge was the Wikipedia article "", which incorporated an Archives-held photo of the first African-American recruit to the. Before the challenge, according to McDevitt-Parks, "a thorough history of desegregation in the U.S. Marines didn't exist in Wikipedia's knowledge ecosystem. The topic wasn't totally ignored, but simply split among related entries; a devoted, focused article never existed solely in its own right."

The "Wikipedian in Residence" position falls within the Archives' social media staff within the Open Government division of Information Services, since the institution's goal is to distribute as much content to the widest audience possible. The internship is 40 hours per week from mid-May to late August.

Interview
Before you started your internship, how close of a relationship did the National Archives have with Wikipedia?

There was no official relationship, however the National Archives has long been supportive of Wikipedia. Earlier this year, for instance, the National Archives hosted a meetup in the main DC location in honor of Wikipedia's tenth anniversary. The Archivist of the United States,, is incredibly friendly to Wikipedia, as are many of the National Archives' staff. As he wrote after WikiXDC, "As an agency, I look forward to our staff learning more about the fabric and culture of Wikipedia and how to get involved." He also to the Wikimedia Foundation offering support from the National Archives for the successful Washington D.C. bid for Wikimania 2012. In all likelihood, this is not a relationship that will end after this summer, either.

Why is it important that institutions like the National Archives foster this sort of relationship with Wikipedia?

Archives and other such institutions preserve our cultural heritage not just for the sake of keeping them, but so that we may access and use them. In the 21st century, accessibility is about more than just having exhibitions or a public research room; it is about having a digital presence and proactively delivering content to people with an information need, whether or not they were looking for a particular document from an institution's holding. Wikipedia and its sister projects are perfectly suited for this purpose in a number of ways. The most obvious is visibility. There is no institutional web site in the world that is more popular among general web users than Wikipedia, which is one of the top 10 ranked web sites according to volume of traffic. Its article on a given topic will nearly always rank higher in search engine results than any institution's page, even one about a document actually held by that institution. In general, Wikipedia is the first and often only place online searchers will go to learn about the issues and items in which an institution might specialize. This means that there is no better way to reach the public than Wikipedia, and there is no better way to make one's holdings accessible and—just as important—discoverable than by making it directly available on Wikipedia. The pervasiveness of Wikipedia also means that work to improve it will have much more impact than many other education and outreach programs.

Wikimedia's projects can do more than just reach people, though. It's not merely a content host or a forum, like YouTube,, Facebook, Twitter, and blogs. Wikimedia is a community with an intellectual mission. It will not only make holdings findable, but it will add value to them. They write encyclopedia articles related to the holdings of cultural institutions, or to subjects for which holdings are valuable source material or illustrations; they organize, categorize, and even sometimes digitally restore images; they transcribe and proofread textual documents. They are doing this for their personal fulfillment, nearly always without the knowledge and cooperation of associated cultural institutions. Indeed, thousands of Wikimedians are already engaged in their own little projects which donated content or expertise can help along; both parties are interested in adding value to their work by partnering with the other.

Finally, Wikimedia is unique among the major online fora and hosts for cultural content in that it shares cultural institutions' commitment to open access and public education. Wikipedia is a non-profit, and creating free public knowledge is its sole purpose. All original content is released under a free copyright license so that it can be widely disseminated without permission or fee. In fact, its commitment to freedom of information is so strong that it often cannot even accept works from some cultural institutions which restrict their use in some way (such as by disallowing derivative works or requiring non-commercial use), and making institutions truly free and compatible with Wikipedia is one of the jobs of Wikipedans in Residence. Wikipedia is not just a venue for presenting our cultural heritage, it is an active ally for all institutions that seek to do so.

'''What aspect of having a Wikipedian in Residence is seen as most valuable to the National Archives? What would you, personally, say is the greatest benefit to any cultural institution from engaging with the Wikimedia community?'''

For the National Archives, all of the above apply. This is about public outreach and increasing access and use. NARA wants to find users where they are, not just wait for them to visit, and the people are on Wikipedia. According to David Ferriero, the National Archives would like this collaboration with Wikipedia to exemplify their "commitment to the Open Government principles of transparency, participation, and collaboration." Wikimedia partnerships are so promising because they can be extensions of any institution's mission in a number of conceivable ways.

'You have already told The Washington Post'' that other institutions have hired Wikipedians in residence, including the British Museum, the Museu Picasso, and the Archives of American Art. Do you know of any other institutions that may develop similar relationships with Wikipedia in the near future?'''

You can see a listing of other Wikipedian residencies here. There have been several, but still less than ten, and each situation has been unique. I can't really speak to any specific future collaborations being worked on, as I am not privy to those negotiations. However, I will say more generally that these relationships are only going to become more common. Wikimedians and chapters around the world have been in touch with various institutions interested in working with us. I saw and met many of these people firsthand at GLAMcamp NYC, which was attended by dozens of excited representatives from cultural institutions attracted by the prospect of a relationship with Wikipedia and just as many incredibly motivated Wikimedians who are involved in reaching out to these institutions.

Are there other — non-Wikimedia — opportunities online you feel the National Archives should look for?

The goal of cataloging, describing, digitizing, and transcribing the entire holdings of the National Archives is an impossible one using traditional methods and within traditional budget constraints. Cultural institutions need to engage the interested public to become active partners in preserving cultural heritage, rather than simply consumers. The work with Wikimedia is an important aspect of that new thinking, but there are all sorts of allied projects out there that would also make good partners. This includes similar crowdsourced projects for scanning and transcription, which the National Archives is already seeking out, as well as other specialized groups interested in digital history or particular topic areas.

How have your experiences — both in school and in Wikipedia — prepared you for this job?

I am a history geek and an archivist-in-training. In my life off of Wikipedia, I have an undergraduate history degree, have worked in library/archive settings before, and am currently pursuing master's degrees in both history and library science (archives management). I think these real-life experiences in their field are one of the main reasons that the National Archives was comfortable letting me on to their staff. I hope to be able to relate to the people and the practices here on a higher level than the average Wikimedian. I believe strongly in the work and the mission of the National Archives completely apart from how it syncs up with Wikipedia.

As a Wikimedian, I have been deeply immersed in various aspects of the project for many years now. I first started back in 2004, and have been an administrator since 2005. Along the way, I served as arbitrator, CheckUser, oversighter, and OTRSer, gaining a useful perspective on some of the project's inner workings and (for lack of a better word) governance. I've also done outreach to real people as a for university students in Boston. I am cross-project Wikimedian, having also been very involved in over the years, where I am also an administrator. I have written content ranging from dictionary definitions of modern colloquialisms to articles on Chilean revolutionaries. But, most importantly, I hope that my familiarity with the culture and practices of Wikimedians will help facilitate this National Archives collaboration.

Having worked in the National Archives for a few weeks now, has your approach to or perception of your work in Wikipedia or the National Archives changed in any way?

I really wasn't sure what to expect when I got here. The staff have all been exceedingly welcoming and cooperative which is a major relief. The real work has been figuring out what I can do and where best to spend my time. Most of the National Archives' documents are not digitized, and possibly not even cataloged on the item-level. Those certainly include some items that Wikimedians would like to use for their projects, but it remains to be seen how much I can realistically do in one summer with those documents. I do want to get as much digital content as possible on, but aside from the technological challenges we face at Commons in trying to figure out how to do mass uploads, the situation with the National Archives' scan files is just as much of a barrier. They are often confusingly named, difficult to locate, or incomplete. I hit the ground running with the upload of an important batch of Ansel Adams photographs, but it turns out that that was actually the lowest-possible hanging fruit.

What challenges do you foresee having to face in your work?

The real challenges are about organization, both of documents—as I mentioned—and of people.

One of the biggest challenges is that we need Wikimedians to get on board with the project in a big way. This is an incredible opportunity for us as a project, but it requires a special community effort to take full advantage of it. We need volunteers to tag articles, to categorize media, to help with templates and coding tools, to write related article content, to transcribe and proofread texts, to add new images to articles, to digitally restore images, and so on. I can personally serve as the point of contact between the National Archives and Wikimedia, but it needs to be much more than that to be a successful project. At this point, the project spaces I am creating on-wiki are my attempt to create an inviting and useful infrastructure to serve as a hub for this effort, but they are not organically grown like most Wikimedia projects. I, and various helpers with templates and coding, have magicked them into existence in the last few weeks. They need participants to sign up and adopt them as their own so we can really get the ball rolling.

'The New York Times'' reported in January that less than fifteen percent of Wikipedia's contributors are women. The article raised concerns that this gender gap has affected the relative emphasis of topics covered on the encyclopedia. In what ways would this problem affect your own efforts to organize the Wikipedia community, and how do you plan to address it?'''

This is an issue that I care strongly about. (And somewhat relatedly, I served, and will continue to serve, as Campus Ambassador at a women's college, and it was a wonderful experience.) The problem is really about more than gender imbalance; it's about having a community that represents a diversity of backgrounds, viewpoints, and personalities. Those of us who work in the humanities can also sometimes feel like a minority on Wikipedia, as one would expect from a male-dominated culture. There is a lot of room for improvement on Wikipedia of articles related to women's history—as well as the history of minority and non-Western peoples—and the National Archives has some incredible resources for these topics. One of the things that I would like to be able to do at the National Archives is to tap their existing pool of volunteers and funnel them towards NARA-related volunteerism on Wikimedia projects. As a national organization with various facilities and presidential libraries throughout the country, there is a lot of potential for various local volunteer communities to get involved. Institutions like the National Archives have volunteers eager to help their cause, but who would otherwise not get involved in Wikipedia, and this group of people likely has a very different demographic makeup than Wikipedia as a whole. I can attest that the library/archives community is certainly not male-dominated. The National Archives is interested in collaborating with Wikipedia not because it wants to lay work at the feet of the Wikipedia community specifically, but because it wants Wikipedia to be a platform for the public at large to be able to become active participants in preserving and interpreting their cultural heritage. This plan also means organizing a corresponding corps of Wikipedian volunteers to welcome and mentor such new editors.

Which aspects of this particular internship attracted you more than any other job opportunity you could have obtained?

I am a longtime, obsessive Wikimedian with a passion for history who is studying to become an archivist. Every aspect of the opportunity attracted me as soon as I learned about it. :-)


text:
User talk:B.f.s

-- 15:07, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:B.f.s


text:
User talk:FraVdd81

-- 15:08, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:FraVdd81


text:
User talk:Seamorgh

-- 15:10, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Seamorgh


text:
User talk:Wikiwoodchuck

-- 15:49, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Wikiwoodchuck


text:
User talk:Sady.Storm

-- 16:02, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sady.Storm


text:
User talk:Nmisra

-- 16:12, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nmisra


text:
User talk:Irfanmk

-- 16:20, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Irfanmk


text:
User talk:Xfact

-- 16:23, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Xfact


text:
User talk:Daviderman

-- 16:26, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Daviderman


text:
User talk:Pavlete

-- 16:35, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Pavlete


text:
Thread:Comments:Eritrea accuses four Britons of espionage and terrorism/Where are they being held?/reply

you must have ONE brain cell only...of course they are being held in Eritea


text:
User talk:Itsyou08

-- 16:40, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Itsyou08


text:
User talk:Satvik kumar

-- 16:42, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Satvik kumar


text:
User talk:Vili2000

-- 16:56, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Vili2000


text:
User talk:Sirsiman

-- 17:19, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sirsiman


text:
User talk:Bridger~enwikinews

-- 17:21, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Bridger. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Bridger~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:14, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:29, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bridger~enwikinews


text:
User talk:Arnorl

-- 17:37, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Arnorl


text:
User talk:Surekha~enwikinews

-- 17:50, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Surekha. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Surekha~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:33, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:37, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Surekha~enwikinews


text:
User talk:ארדף

-- 17:51, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:ארדף


text:
User talk:Wigiedit

-- 18:09, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Wigiedit


text:
User talk:Aidarzver

-- 18:14, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Aidarzver


text:
User talk:Lonchi**

-- 18:16, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lonchi**


text:
Thread:Comments:Barack Obama announces 2012 re-election bid/Comments from feedback form - "screw you obama."/reply (3)

Let me guess; you and the other IP editor distributed the "Obama as the child of chimps" photo to all your Redneck friends, right?

Internationally, he has restored the reputation of the US after that malodorous cretin Bush shoved faith-based government down everyone's throats.

But, it'll be your vote to waste; Palin 2012! Vote for an ex-beauty queen who'd push the button to bring the rapture.


text:
User talk:Azer2958

-- 18:20, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Azer2958


text:
User talk:Vinícius Correia

-- 18:26, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Vinícius Correia


text:
User talk:Filand6

-- 18:29, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Filand6


text:
User talk:Cruzmonique

-- 18:51, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Cruzmonique


text:
User talk:Delfort

-- 18:52, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Delfort


text:
User talk:Kevinraper12

-- 19:01, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kevinraper12


text:
User talk:Etienne ad

-- 19:13, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Etienne ad


text:
User talk:Mwilkowski

-- 19:24, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mwilkowski


text: Category:Jerry Falwell

title: Category:Jerry Falwell


text:
User talk:Rangoondispenser

-- 19:31, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rangoondispenser


text: Category:Hustler Magazine v. Falwell

title: Category:Hustler Magazine v. Falwell


text:
User talk:ВиКуЛйа

-- 19:41, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:ВиКуЛйа


text:
User talk:Bakideraddon

-- 19:44, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bakideraddon


text:
User talk:Uligonza

-- 19:46, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Uligonza


text:
User talk:Chaery

-- 20:02, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Chaery


text:
User talk:Rokindotnish

-- 20:15, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rokindotnish


text:
User talk:Ychilov

-- 20:38, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ychilov


text:
User talk:Aciram

-- 20:39, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Aciram


text:
User talk:Elliott, Caleb

-- 20:49, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Elliott, Caleb


text:
User talk:Airposte

-- 20:56, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Airposte


text:
User talk:Gnayshkr3020

-- 20:56, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gnayshkr3020


text:
User talk:Vilejelly811

-- 21:05, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Vilejelly811


text:
User talk:Th3 M!n!0n

-- 21:07, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Th3 M!n!0n


text:
Court rules Massey can appeal US restrictions in mine disaster investigation

June 13, 2011 In a unanimous decision, a US federal appeals court issued a ruling Friday against the federal government, in favor of, owner of the Upper Branch Mine in West Virginia, the location of last year's that killed 29 workers. The court ruled the company may appeal the restrictions placed on it by a government order hindering the company's ability to conduct its own internal investigation of the disaster.

The order controlling Massey's investigations into the disaster was placed on Massey immediately after the incident by the (MSHA) when it seized control of the coal mine six hours after the blast on April 5.

MSHA's controls prohibited Massey from "taking or retaining photographs, collecting and preserving mine dust samples, employing mine mapping technology, and participating in or objecting to any destructive testing of materials gathered underground." Massey said MSHA's restrictions prevented the company from evaluating the accident site before it was altered by investigators, and denied Massey the chance to gather evidence to use in the company's defense.

Massey's appeal to the (the commission that decides disputes over mining regulations) to void the order by MSHA was denied by the commission. It based its decision on its interpretation of the that it had no authority to consider Massey's appeal. The set aside this decision, finding the commission's interpretation of the act was "simply untenable" and the government's actions had denied Massey the opportunity to gather "potentially important exculpatory evidence".

The court rejected the commission's position that the Mine Act's language was ambiguous, allowing the government flexibility in its implementation. Rather, the court said, "No matter how you parse it, [the act] is a model of near-perfect clarity. Indeed, it is hard to imagine a clearer expression of congressional language." It also rejected the commission's position that the case was moot: "This case is not moot. Indeed, even the counsel recognized the near-frivolity of this argument, and made only a half-hearted attempt to persuade us."

The court's ruling comes after a state government-comissioned report issued on May 19 by investigators found Massey Energy responsible for the deaths of the 29 workers. The workers were killed in an explosion that could have been avoided, the report said, if Massey had put in place standard safety procedures.

"The story of Upper Big Branch is a cautionary tale of hubris. A company that was a towering presence in the coal fields operated its mines in a profoundly reckless manner, and 29 coal miners paid with their lives for the corporate risk taking," the report read. "The company's ventilation system did not adequately ventilate the mine. As a result, explosive gases were allowed to build up." The report detailed claims Massey threatened miners with termination if they stopped work in areas that lacked adequate oxygen levels and listed numerous other state and federal safety standards that Massey failed to follow. Also blamed in the report was MSHA for failing to enforce federal regulations.

The report was considered by the those in the mining industry as especially direct and "hard hitting". It firmly rejected conclusions reached by Massey officials that the incident was caused by an unexpected, massive, and uncontrollable bubble eruption, an occurrence that Massey said it could neither predict nor manage.

The company immediately challenged the report and issued its own report on June 3, blaming the blast on an act of nature and denying the company's safety culture was at fault. MSHA also have an as-yet unreleased report in the works.


text:
User talk:Zruby

-- 21:33, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Zruby


text:
User talk:Jedilni list

-- 21:39, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jedilni list


text:
User talk:Abbela

-- 22:00, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Abbela


text:
User talk:Krishnavedala

-- 22:06, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Krishnavedala


text:
User talk:TCO

-- 22:06, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:TCO


text:
User talk:Jtm56

-- 22:43, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jtm56


text:
User talk:Simeonboxco

-- 22:52, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Simeonboxco


text:
User talk:DonaldET3

-- 22:53, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:DonaldET3


text: Category:House of Lords

title: Category:House of Lords


text:
User talk:Mary Angelique Nava

-- 23:25, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mary Angelique Nava


text:
User talk:Cahitbinici

-- 23:37, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Cahitbinici


text:
Talk:Court rules Massey can appeal US restrictions in mine disaster investigation

Review of revision 1244682 [Failed]
The editors on this website are pathetic. Apparently a Scottish University adding "comic studies" as a department is newsworthy, but this is not. It's a report that was released, it's not time sensitive. As for being one sided, I reported on the outcome of an independent objective report, there is no bias there, it's the facts of the report. Also "the substantial parts from Wikipedia" were what I just to added to Wikipedia literally two minutes ago. This is why I left wikinews.Soapy (talk) 23:57, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Not time sensitive? I think you're missing the new part of news. Blood Red Sandman (Talk)   (Contribs) 00:01, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

The facts of this report wont be altered by the passage of a month, whereas say for a bombing attack in Libya a week from now the article could be irrelevant. I have published articles on reports a month after they are released before, see http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Congressional_panel_concludes_Gulf_War_Syndrome_a_legitimate_condition. See Soapy (talk) 00:04, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

This isn't about facts. Facts don't cease to be facts, but news ceases to be news. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 00:05, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

I assure you that this report will be news to almost anyone who reads it, and it's only a month old. Soapy (talk) 00:06, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

 * Soapy, maybe things were different in 2008, or there were some exceptions (there were times when we didn't even require editor review).. I'm sorry I wasn't active here at that time and I can't explain why that happened. As of now, we require that Wikinews articles are not reports - we only publish articles on events that happened within last week. You may want to re-consider that when writing your next story, we are more than happy to receive your help. Smile.png -Gryllida 00:07, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Alright then, you guys have fun with your news service which nobody reads because most of the articles are a joke Smile.png (talk) 00:09, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

 * OH, and Congressional panel concludes Gulf War Syndrome a legitimate condition has a December 3 source. It's generally "events that happened within last week with recent details that came to light within last 2-3 days", if an article doesn't satisfy either condition, we don't publish it; that article satisfies at least one, and the other one with a large jump over to a few weeks instead of one. -Gryllida 00:10, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
 * So if I add a token statement about this http://www.dailymail.com/ap/ApTopStories/201106110745, it will get published is what you're saying? Soapy (talk) 00:11, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

 * It might get a pass if it is okay with the rest of the requirements. While we generally don't encourage news stories on events that happened longer than a week ago, if a story is a great work otherwise, it might get a pass. -Gryllida 00:14, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

 * It had bloody well better not. The news event must be within seven days, and new information must have come to light within 2–3 days.  And it should be actually new information, not just a token republication of information that had been available before.  Later than seven days, if new information comes to light, that coming to light would have to itself be the news event.

 * Our current high standards were a long hard slog to put in place, and that previously published article was late in the period before they were solidly in place. --Pi zero (talk) 00:23, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Review of revision 1244778 [Failed]
Let's clarify, state of West Virginia released its first report in May, then Massey Energy released its report on June 3, 2010. If anything, we should choose the latter one to report news about, while only a small part of the article can introduce the reader to the preceding events. Even in this case, it would not exactly qualify as news, because the event happened more than a week ago. Sorry. -Gryllida 01:03, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

 * If there is some sort of newsworthy reaction to the Massey report, that happened within the past day or two, a news article could be about that reaction. It'd have to be a newsworthy reaction, with a couple of mutually independent, reputable news sources.  A slim hope, perhaps, but at least that may serve as an illustration of how the freshness criterion works.  --Pi zero (talk) 01:10, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

 * http://www.nytimes.com/gwire/2011/06/10/10greenwire-appeals-court-rules-for-massey-over-us-in-uppe-41569.html says a report was released on June 10, with the June 3 one being "without Alpha's approval" - we could try writing about that. -Gryllida 01:12, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

 * Might work. With two independent sources for it.  --Pi zero (talk) 01:17, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

 * Good work in this revision, thanks Mattisse and Soapy. But what we see is the report, accompanied by a few words of the reporter. It may be great to find public's responses, comments of other governmental people, or some more details on events that surround the report publication. Did someone criticize the report? Did any of the sides comment on any of its parts? ..and to add them to the a bit "plain" description of the report itself. -Gryllida 02:41, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I agree more is needed. I don't know much about the report nor the legal history of the order or the appeal of the order. So I can't add what you are suggesting. I'm hoping someone clarifies. Mattisse (talk) 03:21, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I concentrated on the recent sources and rewrote the article. Hopefully no one minds, but the recent sources focused on the District Court decision issued Friday, June 10, 2010 and not as much on the report which was the original subject of the article. Mattisse (talk) 16:27, 12 June 2011 (UTC)


text:
User talk:Bradpotts

-- 23:48, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bradpotts


text: Comments:Russian reverse engineers Skype; uploads source to public


text:
Thread:Comments:British voice artist Roy Skelton dies at age 79/Comments from feedback form - "I've edited with words from th..."

I've edited with words from the Sky Mocies Box Office page "this can be completed by pressing "box office" button"


text:
Thread:Comments:Russian reverse engineers Skype; uploads source to public/Comments from feedback form - "The fact that we rely so much ..."

The fact that we rely so much on the internet to communicate with each other is troubling and does not bode well for national security.


text:
User talk:Ohiostatebuckeyes227

-- 00:16, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ohiostatebuckeyes227


text:
User talk:Abiramsan

-- 00:36, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Abiramsan


text:
User talk:Budokax

-- 01:11, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Budokax


text:
User talk:Gopips

-- 01:12, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gopips


text:
User talk:U841

-- 01:35, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:U841


text:
User talk:Manjeetsinghkanaud

-- 02:19, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Manjeetsinghkanaud


text:
User talk:PoliSciLawyer2Be

-- 02:23, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:PoliSciLawyer2Be


text:
User talk:Scottmatthews1978

-- 02:34, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Scottmatthews1978


text:
User talk:Martinipen

-- 02:44, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Martinipen


text:
User talk:Patkwokhk

-- 03:04, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Patkwokhk


text:
User talk:Alexeque111

-- 03:05, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Alexeque111


text:
User talk:Julian Echevarria

-- 03:08, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Julian Echevarria


text:
User talk:AP98JA78

-- 03:19, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:AP98JA78


text:
User talk:Yomixi cossio

-- 03:56, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Yomixi cossio


text:
User talk:Ginmassoli

-- 04:28, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ginmassoli


text:
User talk:Tuanhai601

-- 04:52, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tuanhai601


text:
User talk:67.182.29.56

Welcome
-Gryllida 04:53, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:67.182.29.56


text:
User talk:Puneet96

-- 05:19, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Puneet96


text:
User talk:Aeronaeron

-- 05:36, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Aeronaeron


text:
User talk:R.tejesh22

-- 05:47, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:R.tejesh22


text:
User talk:Z4r4thustr4

-- 06:18, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Z4r4thustr4


text:
User talk:Siberiantazo

-- 06:44, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Siberiantazo


text:
User talk:Theaideascompany

-- 06:52, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Theaideascompany


text:
User talk:Beowulf2

-- 07:13, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Beowulf2


text:
User talk:Cawarra84

-- 07:21, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Cawarra84


text:
User talk:Sbshuvo

-- 07:40, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sbshuvo


text:
User talk:Jl.jiang

-- 07:41, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jl.jiang


text:
User talk:Pc204

-- 07:42, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Pc204


text:
User talk:Старлаб

-- 07:42, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Старлаб


text:
User talk:Eyalnew1975

-- 07:59, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Eyalnew1975


text:
User talk:Lalsinbox

-- 08:02, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lalsinbox


text:
User talk:Genial1509

-- 08:19, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Genial1509


text:
User talk:Eszlg

-- 08:19, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Eszlg


text:
User talk:Mxl13

-- 08:36, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mxl13


text:
User talk:Заполярье

-- 08:51, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Заполярье


text:
User talk:Mano Cruise

-- 09:00, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mano Cruise


text:
User talk:TheMyNess

-- 09:06, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:TheMyNess


text:
User talk:Foodie 377

-- 09:15, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Foodie 377


text:
User talk:Map it

-- 09:38, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Map it


text:
User talk:Mike Holmes

-- 09:41, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mike Holmes


text:
User talk:Charlesfrith

-- 09:46, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Charlesfrith


text:
User talk:Jh51681

-- 10:27, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jh51681


text:
User talk:Yadavs

-- 11:05, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Yadavs


text:
User talk:11coolguy12

-- 11:06, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:11coolguy12


text:
User talk:Bluefox73

-- 11:21, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bluefox73


text:
User talk:Tomeeg

-- 11:30, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tomeeg


text:
User talk:Andilus

-- 11:34, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Andilus


text:
User talk:NupurMathur17

-- 11:40, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:NupurMathur17


text: User talk:Alecmconroy

title: User talk:Alecmconroy


text:
User talk:Rizkyafkarian

-- 12:13, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rizkyafkarian


text:
User talk:口渴口饿

-- 12:20, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:口渴口饿


text:
User talk:Sajjad yasini

-- 12:44, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sajjad yasini


text:
Casey Stoner wins 2011 British MotoGP

June 14, 2011

has won the 2011 British MotoGP placing him at the top of the championship table. The Australian rider started in pole position and finished 15.159 seconds ahead of second place. American claimed third place despite riding with a broken collarbone.

The win at gives Stoner his forth win of the season and places him ahead of previous championship leader, who crashed out during the race. and also failed to finish the race after suffering crashes. The race was affected by bad driving conditions due to heavy rain but a large crowd still attended despite no British riders taking part in the MotoGP.

Speaking to the BBC after his victory Stoner said "At the beginning we didn't get a great start. But the bike felt good, and I waited for the tyres to get up to temperature. In the first lap I had water in my visor, so for the first five or six laps I couldn't really see properly. I couldn't see any puddles. But finally the water went away and I was able to do the lap times I wanted, and open up a gap."

German riders and  won the Moto2 and 125cc classification races.

title: Casey Stoner wins 2011 British MotoGP


text:
User talk:Anlztrk

-- 12:55, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Anlztrk


text:
Template:Number/doc

Usage
Automatically formats a number. Use in the following format: For example: 1000000000
 * numerals

This template is useful because words like "billion" can have different meanings, so the title text provides a simple way for the reader to differentiate, and because it standardises the output of most common numbers to style guide conformance.

title: Template:Number/doc


text:
User talk:Rokaya SALEH

-- 12:59, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rokaya SALEH


text:
User talk:Ninad Parandekar

-- 13:05, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ninad Parandekar


text:
User talk:Mingyang.yi

-- 13:08, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mingyang.yi


text:
User talk:Rijukureekattil

-- 13:19, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rijukureekattil


text:
User talk:Abboavfc

-- 13:26, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Abboavfc


text:
User talk:Uishaki

-- 13:35, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Uishaki


text:
User talk:G. Michael Holmes

-- 13:37, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:G. Michael Holmes


text:
Wikinews:Dynamic quiz/quiz/2011/24

Welcome to the Wikinews World News Quiz, giving you a chance to test your knowledge on this week's news.

Last Updated: June 12, 2011

title: Wikinews:Dynamic quiz/quiz/2011/24


text:
User talk:Automatedmusic

-- 13:40, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Automatedmusic


text:
User talk:Dkchacha

-- 13:46, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dkchacha


text:
User talk:Rahul Kumar Malkani

-- 14:01, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rahul Kumar Malkani


text:
User talk:Hotsauce74

-- 14:04, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hotsauce74


text:
User talk:Gopyhlw

-- 14:41, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gopyhlw


text:
User talk:Lossie101

-- 14:53, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lossie101


text:
User talk:Bora618

-- 14:56, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bora618


text:
User talk:Lucaswhitee

-- 15:05, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lucaswhitee


text:
User talk:Dken-1

-- 15:05, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dken-1


text:
User talk:Mouh~enwikinews

-- 15:31, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Mouh. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Mouh~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:22, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:34, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mouh~enwikinews


text:
User talk:FadulJA

-- 15:38, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:FadulJA


text:
Thread:Comments:Russian reverse engineers Skype; uploads source to public/Comments from feedback form - "The fact that we rely so much ..."/reply

Why's that?

You know you're using the Internet to communicate right now, right? See how convenient it is! Could you have possibly got that message out to so many people so quickly and easily by sending a chain letter, or phoning everyone personally?

I don't see any national security issues that can come from people communicating via Skype. Believe it or not, that's not how military intelligence is shared.


text:
User talk:Tatilookify

-- 15:46, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tatilookify


text: Category:UK Parliament

title: Category:UK Parliament


text: Category:UK House of Commons

title: Category:UK House of Commons


text:
Thread:Comments:Microsoft waits for death of Internet Explorer 6/Comments from feedback form - "Quality article."

Quality article.


text:
User talk:Flfz

-- 16:46, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Flfz


text:
User talk:Cajuncub

-- 16:48, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Cajuncub


text:
User talk:Mihai-bogdan

-- 16:58, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mihai-bogdan


text: Category:Australian Parliament

title: Category:Australian Parliament


text:
User:MC10/common.js

// User:MC10/OtherWiki.js mw.loader.load('//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:MC10/OtherWiki.js'    + '&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript');

title: User:MC10/common.js


text:
Thread:Comments:EF-3 tornado strikes western Massachusetts/Comments from feedback form - "bad"

bad


text:
User talk:康宁宝彻

-- 17:17, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:康宁宝彻


text:
User talk:Pamerast

-- 17:18, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Pamerast


text:
User talk:Jonathan kalala

-- 17:19, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jonathan kalala


text:
User talk:Bkersten275

-- 17:20, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bkersten275


text:
User talk:Kerl Fieser

-- 17:29, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kerl Fieser


text:
User talk:Fano277

-- 17:34, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Fano277


text:
User talk:Karanvir.rk

-- 17:38, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Karanvir.rk


text:
User talk:Digitalbalu

-- 17:52, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Digitalbalu


text:
User talk:Kokibgotstanketo

-- 18:04, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kokibgotstanketo


text:
User talk:Innocent datumbot

-- 18:11, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Innocent datumbot


text:
User talk:SantiH98

-- 18:11, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:SantiH98


text:
User talk:Philmarin

-- 18:29, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Philmarin


text:
User talk:Fwfwa

-- 18:29, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Fwfwa


text:
User talk:Sjaakoostdijk

-- 18:32, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sjaakoostdijk


text:
User talk:Innocent bot

-- 19:06, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Innocent bot


text:
User talk:Vaibhav Sawant

-- 19:11, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Vaibhav Sawant


text:
User talk:Alfredrranci

-- 19:16, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Alfredrranci


text:
User talk:Krafty54

-- 19:30, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Krafty54


text:
User talk:علی ویکی

-- 19:30, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:علی ویکی


text:
User talk:Ecceart

-- 19:33, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ecceart


text:
User talk:Camiloo.97

-- 19:34, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Camiloo.97


text:
User talk:Valentin3716

-- 19:51, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Valentin3716


text:
User talk:CompilingAutumn

-- 19:55, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:CompilingAutumn


text:
User talk:Fazail7

-- 20:01, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Fazail7


text:
User talk:Nakan25

-- 20:07, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nakan25


text:
User talk:Rayed202

-- 20:12, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rayed202


text:
User talk:Kaeph

-- 20:21, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kaeph


text:
User talk:Amekpordi

-- 20:28, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Amekpordi


text:
User talk:Ibrahim dag

-- 20:32, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ibrahim dag


text:
User talk:Vangelists

-- 20:37, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Vangelists


text:
User talk:Wildcursive

-- 20:39, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Welcome from me
Hello. Thank you for contributing to Wikinews. Your edits on "Taiwan's Constitutional Court legalizes gay marriage, gives legislators two years to amend marriage laws" are reverted (not done by me), unfortunately, as some of the sources you added were deemed unreliable. On the bright side, feel free to leave your comments at "Comments:Taiwan's Constitutional Court legalizes gay marriage, gives legislators two years to amend marriage laws" if you wish. --George Ho (talk) 20:36, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Wildcursive


text:
User talk:Chasednathaly

-- 20:59, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Chasednathaly


text:
User talk:Madmargib

-- 21:14, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Madmargib


text:
User talk:Jaimeuskadi

-- 21:38, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jaimeuskadi


text:
User talk:MissPumpkin 3.14

-- 21:48, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:MissPumpkin 3.14


text:
User talk:S9123

-- 22:16, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:S9123


text:
Talk:Up to 31 reported dead as Libyan government troops attack Misrata

Review of revision 1245158 [Passed]
it was really bad                as i think it is against the humanity


text: Comments:Up to 31 reported dead as Libyan government troops attack Misrata


text:
User talk:Greatpatton

-- 22:20, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Greatpatton


text:
User talk:Sedunova

-- 22:30, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sedunova


text:
User talk:Ykhwong

-- 22:34, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ykhwong


text:
Thread:Comments:Russian reverse engineers Skype; uploads source to public/Comments from feedback form - "The fact that we rely so much ..."/reply (2)

Military intelligence is an oxymoron.


text:
Thread:Comments:Russian reverse engineers Skype; uploads source to public/Skype security

According to the Wikipedia article Skype security, the protocol (according to the company) uses standard cryptographic systems like RSA and AES. So why should having the source code reverse engineered be a security concern? The company's reaction completely undermines any claims they had to security.


text:
User talk:Joeck12

-- 23:23, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Joeck12


text:
User talk:Djay49

-- 23:27, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Djay49


text:
User talk:Martinglanio

-- 23:40, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Martinglanio


text:
User talk:Kertraon

-- 23:55, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kertraon


text:
User talk:MrDonas

-- 00:20, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:MrDonas


text:
User talk:T9

-- 00:23, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:T9


text:
User talk:Astricitax

-- 00:23, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Astricitax


text:
User talk:Antonov An-225

-- 01:16, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Antonov An-225


text:
User talk:Ssporemolux

-- 01:19, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ssporemolux


text:
User talk:Sebxxx

-- 01:23, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sebxxx


text:
User talk:Dipu tr

-- 01:39, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dipu tr


text:
User talk:Heron Ree

-- 01:40, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Heron Ree


text:
User talk:Rpardoi30

-- 01:41, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rpardoi30


text:
User talk:ATDT

-- 01:43, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:ATDT


text:
User talk:95.165.79.157

Welcome

 * I see you tried adding another source to Russian reverse engineers Skype; uploads source to public - please don't do that after article publication. You are welcome to change developing articles or use published articles discussion sections if they're inaccurate; major chnges are acceptable just within 24 hours after publication, after which only inaccurate information can be corrected with a correction per community agreement at the discussion page.

Thanks again, and, welcome to Wikinews!

-Gryllida 02:00, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:95.165.79.157


text:
User talk:Harriet6685

-- 02:13, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Harriet6685


text:
User talk:Michellecolonjohnson

-- 02:16, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Michellecolonjohnson


text:
User talk:Skimbio

-- 02:22, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Skimbio


text:
User talk:Dreamachine

-- 02:30, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dreamachine


text:
User talk:Sergio.mujica

-- 02:49, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sergio.mujica


text:
User talk:Ginandjesus

-- 02:55, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ginandjesus


text:
User talk:Hunter.rus

-- 03:22, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hunter.rus


text:
User talk:Socnet

-- 04:33, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Socnet


text:
User talk:Breakingspell

-- 04:40, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Breakingspell


text:
User talk:Lucien504

-- 05:11, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lucien504


text:
User talk:Dibin mundukottackal

-- 05:31, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dibin mundukottackal


text:
User talk:Ryan juliao

-- 05:32, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ryan juliao


text:
User talk:Joshuaending

-- 05:47, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Joshuaending


text:
User talk:Mad Alric

-- 05:48, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mad Alric


text:
User talk:Tobias Paul

-- 05:57, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tobias Paul


text:
User talk:NapoleonMadrid

-- 06:04, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:NapoleonMadrid


text:
User talk:Confuseus

-- 06:08, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Confuseus


text:
User talk:Mdm.Adams

-- 06:11, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mdm.Adams


text:
Talk:Wikinews interviews US National Archives Wikipedian in Residence

Might I suggest a rephrasing of Q5? "Are there other - non-Wikimedia - opportunities online you feel the National Archives should look for?" --Brian McNeil / talk 06:12, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Done. Thanks for the suggestion! Dominic has already been invited to respond to the questions here, so hopefully I've changed the text quickly enough for him to see the changes. Ragettho (talk) 13:46, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

random notes
The following are notes to self, since I'm about to go to bed. :) Feel free to help or comment if you wish.

File:Dominic during Campus Ambassador training, 2011-01-07.jpg looks like it could be cropped. This would allow for a bigger view of Dominic's body and less of the distracting plants and powerpoint presentation. Right now Ferriero's figure appears much larger than Dominic's.

It would be a great file to have on this article, but only if there is space.

Is the Education category appropriate? Sleeping on it.

What else could I do to expand the intro text? Is expansion needed? Did I give undue weight to particular aspects of this story? Did my Wikimedia bias show?

Follow-up questions?

Check again for grammar/spelling errors when done.

Ragettho (talk) 05:40, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

 * Copy of Ferriero's letter now available on Commons. Ragettho (talk) 05:29, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

OR notes for review
The interviewee provided answers directly onto the wiki. (2 edits for first set of questions and 1 edit for follow-up).

Dominic also corrected the information regarding the organizational structure of his internship position. This information seems to supersede contradictory information presented in The Atlantic source.

Lastly, Dominic has indicated his satisfaction with the article, though he has pointed out that he is working the maximum 40 hours per week. I'm not quite sure whether I should change the last sentence of the intro text to reflect this, so I'll leave it up to the reviewer to decide. Ragettho (talk) 04:20, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Sarah's concern over quote
flag I've noted Sarah's concerns, and I tend to agree the quote is out-of-context. The "chop" seems to push the idea that cultural institutions are 'hoarding'; they're not in this case. The blog cites exploitation of images such as the Mona Lisa. It would be more appropriat eto have the "''...the importance of contemporary image donations to free culture will allow for educators to inform the world that people in these communities are flourishing today - and are not stuck in the past of black and white images taken by a government employee." remark as a quote. It's more forward-looking regarding the issue of image release.''"

I'd welcome other people's input on this, and note that substantially citing Sarah should've been brought up with her pre-publication. --Brian McNeil / talk 20:29, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

 * I sighted your edit, as it checked out and does seem more in the positive spirit of her blog post. Am wondering what she thinks of the revised passage.  --Pi zero (talk) 21:10, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks PiZ. I suspect we'll get a response soon. It seemed the earlier phrasing was awkward in terms of pushing for "radical liberation" of content. Something to learn here for the author, and the reviewer.
 * As a wider issue, I think there's a need to be particularly careful in covering Wikimedians in Residence. They're effectively WMF ambassadors to the GLAM sectors. What they say, and write, is carefully picked wording. Taking a phrase that strikes a chord with one of our contributors could sour relationships. I don't want to see that happen (I've a bot of a COI here,... I'm effectively the interim liaison between WM UK and Museums and Galleries Scotland - and I want preferred access to exhibit openings and so on to try my hand at culture-related OR.) --Brian McNeil / talk 21:19, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

 * Actually, the main source I used for that was the Wikipedia Signpost, not the blog. I only used the blog to provide a more complete quote than what was presented in the Signpost. In any case, I've reread the blog post, and I still think that my interpretation of Sarah's post was accurate.
 * For example, here's a further snippet from the blog post: "Regardless, there are some institutions that can rake in the dough at licensing off images of the Mona Lisa and Van Gogh, despite being out of copyright - just like the Ansel Adams images created for the feds - these are public domain. We own them, the public, so let us have them, right?" How does this not imply that Sarah is pushing against the hoarding of freely-licensed works by various institutions?
 * Regardless of the answer, the quote that is now in the article seems (to me, at least) more out-of-context than the previous quote. The new quote was referring to donations of privately-held, fully copyrighted works to the rest of the community. ("I'd love to see a content donation from an Indigenous community - specifically images of people today.") That does not fit in with the context of this Wikinews article, since I was trying to describe NARA's efforts to distribute hard-to-find free images to the rest of the public.
 * I will remove the quote currently in place, pending further review. Ragettho (talk) 23:32, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
 * You, out of context from the blog post, put across the "radical liberation of content" POV. --Brian McNeil / talk 05:08, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
 * So, in your opinion, what was the actual message that Sarah tried to convey in her blog post? Ragettho (talk) 05:12, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
 * As a whole, the blog post is noting a "managed release" of content, and poses wider release as a question. That Sarah felt you'd quoted well out-of-context is the main concern. --Brian McNeil / talk 06:10, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

 * Generally speaking, if a source genuinely feels they've been quoted out-of-context, and that it's a problem, we'd work to rectify that. Of course, there would be occasional exceptions; if a big org felt they were quoted poorly on something unsavoury, a key issue in an article perhaps, I'd rather add it into the article that the quoted source "said their remarks had been 'taken out of context'" or similar. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 11:33, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Um
Two things:
 * 1) What's a "Wikipedian-in-Residence"? This isn't explained anywhere into the article.
 * 2) I think the Archivist of the United States should be mentioned (in this case, and if I'm not wrong, he's ).

This wasn't published yesterday night so I think this can still be corrected :P Cheers, アンパロ Io ti odio! 22:24, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

 * I've proposed a one-sentence paragraph right after the lede. In retrospect, it would have been good to make this a question in the interview — What is a Wikipedian in Residence?  What does one do?

 * We're now running short on time. I've wondered lately if we ought to stretch the 24-hour horizon a bit for interviews, just as we stretch the freshness horizon for them.  --Pi zero (talk) 14:02, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

FA!!!!
editprotected The FAC passed. Please add FA to this article. :) Ragettho (talk) 14:24, 10 October 2011 (UTC)


text:
User talk:Hermiongranger

-- 06:13, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hermiongranger


text:
User talk:Bluanioure

-- 06:16, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bluanioure


text:
User talk:OranluzonDD

-- 06:44, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:OranluzonDD


text:
User talk:MyDNangel

-- 06:59, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:MyDNangel


text:
User talk:Mapemoni

-- 07:00, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mapemoni


text:
User talk:Miroslav.novotny70

-- 07:13, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Miroslav.novotny70


text:
Thread:Comments:Russian reverse engineers Skype; uploads source to public/Skype security/reply

I would be quite interested in reading an analyze of the secrets exposed. Specially about whether they found any backdoors in the system that proves Skype (the company) has the ability to eavesdrop on the communications that go thru the network.


text:
User talk:Schwepps911

-- 07:31, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Schwepps911


text:
User talk:Mirwane

-- 07:53, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mirwane


text:
User talk:UBP.Palle

-- 07:59, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:UBP.Palle


text:
User talk:Cucozza

-- 08:06, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Cucozza


text:
User talk:Intermediatech

-- 08:10, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Intermediatech


text:
User talk:Helen griffiths

-- 08:16, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Helen griffiths


text:
User talk:Ahmad4d

-- 08:18, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ahmad4d


text:
User talk:Beaucouplusneutre

-- 08:19, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Beaucouplusneutre


text:
User talk:Chiragmarwaha

-- 08:30, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Chiragmarwaha


text:
User talk:Nicpac

-- 08:39, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nicpac


text:
User talk:Vuhoangsonhn

-- 08:39, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Vuhoangsonhn


text:
User talk:Nirose.chen

-- 08:51, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nirose.chen


text:
User talk:Martin Matha

-- 08:52, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Martin Matha


text:
User talk:Dhirendra Das

-- 09:01, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dhirendra Das


text:
User talk:Andonesy

-- 09:06, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Andonesy


text:
User talk:Lucart98

-- 09:12, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lucart98


text:
User talk:Ronaldkurusaki

-- 09:12, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ronaldkurusaki


text:
User talk:Weichtiere

-- 09:27, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Weichtiere


text:
User talk:Depiflute

-- 09:28, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Depiflute


text:
User talk:Kuatov Kanat

-- 09:43, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kuatov Kanat


text:
User talk:Yarole

-- 09:45, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Yarole


text:
User talk:97dan

-- 09:50, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:97dan


text:
User talk:Nesab737

-- 09:54, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nesab737


text:
User talk:Nummer 12

-- 10:00, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nummer 12


text:
User talk:Plusboy

-- 10:05, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Plusboy


text:
User talk:Nizardwaik

-- 10:06, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nizardwaik


text:
User talk:Hanka9690

-- 10:09, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hanka9690


text:
User talk:N. Bourgeois

-- 10:09, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:N. Bourgeois


text:
User talk:FRANCA MARAZIA

-- 10:13, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:FRANCA MARAZIA


text:
User talk:Leonucs

-- 10:23, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Leonucs


text:
User talk:CarlosAndresMurcia

-- 10:29, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:CarlosAndresMurcia


text:
User talk:Vladcolombo

-- 10:38, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Vladcolombo


text:
Thread:Comments:Skype suffers downtime in Europe/Comments from feedback form - "I think it should be unexpecte..."

I think it should be unexpected outage, subsequent outrage was probably expected.


text:
User talk:Jmagp96

-- 10:42, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jmagp96


text:
User talk:Aza ws

-- 10:47, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Aza ws


text:
User talk:Totator

-- 10:55, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Totator


text:
User talk:Earlym.group1

-- 11:00, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Earlym.group1


text:
User talk:Editør

-- 11:06, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Editør


text:
User talk:Proximawest

-- 11:12, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Proximawest


text:
User talk:Andreasgan

-- 11:33, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Andreasgan


text:
User talk:Vir1983

-- 11:37, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Our submission guidelines
I'd like to let you know that here at the English Wikinews, we only accept English language news. You've recently made contributions that don't qualify as news. We appreciate your contributions, but we cannot accept the edits you've made, so they have been reverted or deleted.

In the future, if you'd like to submit news, we are more than happy to have your help! Just make sure to check out this article, which talks about what Wikinews is not. As a brief primer, please note that neither editorial content nor opinion pieces qualify as news.

Thank you for your contributions! -Gryllida 12:14, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Vir1983


text:
User talk:Clevelander09

-- 11:48, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Clevelander09


text:
User talk:Dorian mania

-- 11:52, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dorian mania


text:
User talk:Sameer 8953822263

-- 11:59, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sameer 8953822263


text:
User talk:Sekelsenmat

-- 12:18, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sekelsenmat


text:
User talk:A.96

-- 12:22, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:A.96


text:
User talk:111.93.40.130

--175.38.228.205 (talk) 12:25, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:111.93.40.130


text:
User talk:TheTSO143

-- 12:30, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:TheTSO143


text:
User talk:Cupface1

-- 12:32, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Cupface1


text:
User talk:Sukhis

-- 12:37, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sukhis


text:
User talk:86.185.188.214

Welcome
Hi, please do not place any kind of on our website — it will be  so no one will see it. If you do want to contribute to Wikinews, see the introduction.

-Gryllida 12:38, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:86.185.188.214


text:
User talk:IFPS

-- 12:41, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:IFPS


text:
User talk:Jishnunfs

-- 12:44, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jishnunfs


text:
User talk:IDroid

-- 12:55, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:IDroid


text:
User talk:Nokhaiz Kaunpal

-- 13:01, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nokhaiz Kaunpal


text:
User talk:Barzdonas

-- 13:12, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Barzdonas


text:
User talk:Enzo95ct

-- 13:29, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Enzo95ct


text:
User talk:Multijickson

-- 13:32, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Multijickson


text:
User talk:Shreyas.sps

-- 13:49, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Shreyas.sps


text:
User talk:Lapin Mignon

-- 13:49, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lapin Mignon


text:
User talk:Raof

-- 13:51, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Raof