text:
Wikinews:Featured article candidates/archive/7

Promoted. -- Cirt (talk) 20:07, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

One year on: Egyptians mark anniversary of protests that toppled Mubarak
Self-nominating; I'm nowadays of the view that covering major stories against mainstream media should be done very well if at all, and this is my effort at just that. Blood Red Sandman (Talk)   (Contribs) 17:44, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

 * And an excellent — plus most-comprehensive — example this is. --Brian McNeil / talk 18:57, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Just to riff a bit on short synthesis about major stories. It has its uses; depending on how msm covers it, putting things into clear neutral perspective may have significant value for readers too (plus, of course, the experience it provides to the author(s) and the rounding it provides to our archives).  But I admit, short synthesis seems to me more suited to under-reported stories.  It's certainly a capital mistake to write a short item on a widely covered story just because we "should have something on it". </riff>
 * This article is worthy. --Pi zero (talk) 21:01, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

 * This article has several strong points that make it worthy for nomination and support: The author's focus coincided with the first anniversary of the Jan. 25, 2011 protests and added the most recent information about the country's transition. Timely! This took forethought, advanced preparation and diligence to meet the deadline. The author's comprehensive overview, or depth, was well organized and could be divided into at least three sections: 1) transition to a new government, 2) the economy, and 3) human rights. One suggestion for improvement would be to use sections that would make it easier to read. The reporter also used quality sources and provided the audience with good information about each point. The contrasting photos of Tahir Square "then" and "now" was a good approach to show continuation of negative public sentiment toward the government. The main reason I support this nomination is that the article used synthesis to add perspective. Crtew (talk) 17:39, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
 * , comprehensive, good use of four (4) quality images, important topic, of educational value for the public. -- Cirt (talk) 17:37, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

 * Promoted Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 14:21, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Syrian citizen journalists risk death, targeted; city of Homs facing starvation
If we didn't all know this is exemplary, we wouldn't have devoted so much post-publish discussion to how to make it easier to approach this level of work in future. --Pi zero (talk) 17:36, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Votes

 * as nominator. --Pi zero (talk) 17:36, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
 * for reasons that should not need stating. --Brian McNeil / talk 19:17, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
 * this isn't FA already? --RockerballAustralia c 21:39, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
 * for opening up new ground in its use of video from streaming sites and for its in-depth coverage of a month-long attack Crtew (talk) 21:50, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
 * readily. This is top-flight stuff. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 15:35, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
 * This is really good work that appears to meet all the criteria. --LauraHale (talk) 03:14, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
 * , excellent body of work. -- Cirt (talk) 17:35, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

 * Promoted Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 14:21, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Past Eurovision contestants give advice to this year's performers, speculate on who will win
I think the most in-depth piece Mike did. The number of people he chased down comment from is what makes this most impressive — even if Eurovision makes me thing "Die Wogan Die!" --Brian McNeil / talk 17:21, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Votes

 * for the breadth and depth of interview-based OR. --Brian McNeil / talk 17:21, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
 * , fabulous collection of comment here. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 14:44, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh yeah, fer sure!! Bddpaux (talk) 01:17, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
 * One of the best reports in the music journalism category I have seen on Wikinews! Crtew (talk) 14:56, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The level of research in terms of interviews is very impressive. --LauraHale (talk) 03:15, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
 * , it is indeed in-depth, and utilizes a good amount of multimedia files in addition to the quality writing. -- Cirt (talk) 17:36, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Successful Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 15:49, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Observing the 2012 Human Trafficking Awareness Day in the US, and wider world
Imho a compelling read. It's got "only" two pictures, but they're good ones. Not only is OR not a requirement for an FA, but it isn't even the first listed optional-but-encouraged criterion at WN:WIAFA. First listed is "articles that were worked on by several authors, to highlight the collaborative nature of Wikinews." We often forget that one, because multi-author news writing turns out to be difficult to do well; but in this case the article has over a dozen authors (fourteen, is it?), and did come out well, so I think it a very solid candidate. (Nor was I the first to mention "FA" in the same breath with this article; but I am nominating it.) --Pi zero (talk) 01:58, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

 * as nominator. --Pi zero (talk) 01:58, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
 * for the highly collaborative nature of this in-depth report. What it has highlighted are some of the difficulties in that type of work. As Crtew pointed out, where TIME have a multi-author piece, one person is tasked with going over the article in its entirety to make it flow and 'paper over' the cracks from differing author styles; disclosure: I did a substantial amount of the work in that respect here. --Brian McNeil / talk 11:01, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
 * for a nicely collaborative piece, in spite of the fact I was left wanting a better discussion of how human trafficking is linked to tourism. The article highlights a massively overlooked problem; I'm reminded of this piece (which spun out from this case) which anyone interested in the subject should read; a great shame I forgot about it whilst the WN article was being prepared. Excellent collaboration, which is hard in a news context. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 14:37, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
 * It is a solid article with lots of nice collaboration--Cspurrier (talk) 23:25, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Wikinews interviews former Salt Lake City mayor and 2012 presidential candidate Rocky Anderson
William's hit a great one here, with a wonderful set of detailed responses that make for a first-class interview. Blood Red Sandman (Talk)   (Contribs) 01:04, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

 * Agreed. --Pi zero (talk) 01:09, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
 * . This shows that it can be worthwhile letting the interviewee say what they want to say — where they've not got an agenda to pervert the interview process. --Brian McNeil / talk 10:16, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
 * It is an interesting detailed interview with lots of nice photos --Cspurrier (talk) 23:28, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
 * since that seems to be the done thing these days. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 13:14, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

 * Closed as successful, I don't think interviews come much better than this. Craig's comments are quite valid, but how else do you illustrate an article about a voice artist? --Brian McNeil / talk 09:00, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Billy West, voice of Ren and Stimpy, Futurama, on the rough start that shaped his life
David S. collected more than a few good interviews; this one, having just re-read it, definitely meets all the criteria I look for in content that should be featured. --Brian McNeil / talk 21:32, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

 * as nominator; uninvolved in production of article. --Brian McNeil / talk 21:32, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Holy crap what a riveting interview. Sourcing practices/standards have changed discernibly, I can't help noting (review mode having become a reflex), but that seems to me to have exactly nothing to do, at least in this case, with FA quality.  Leaves the FA criteria in the dust.  --Pi zero (talk) 22:36, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
 * . Most, maybe even all, of Shankbone's interviews were excellent even against FA standards and this was one of the best. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 23:50, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
 * well der --RockerballAustralia c 22:05, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
 * It is a very well done interview, but the fair use claims are kind of weak for the images. I do not think this is a problem for an article, but I am not sure we should consider articles for FA status when there are issue like this. --Cspurrier (talk) 23:32, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Closed as successful, although higher participation in these discussions would be better. --Brian McNeil / talk 23:39, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Cypriot court clears all of wrongdoing in Greek air disaster
Not so long ago, 10kb or so was a solid FA candidate. I'm a little concerned that the FA bar has been raised somewhat by a string of particularly exceptional articles (Diego's military plane crash, Dendodge's space junk, Brian's cultural tours, my own schizobipolar genetics - all with OR). Nonetheless, I'm going to self-nom what I feel is a solid piece of synthesis and the best English coverage I saw of what should have been a major international story. Blood Red Sandman (Talk)   (Contribs) 15:43, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Heh. I believe the expression is, "We've upped our standards; so, up yours!" I like this article, and it's pretty well-written. Don't dispute probably better pieced together than the majority of mainstream coverage. But, I'm going to defer voting for now. I'll most likely support, but want to see how the rest of the community reacts to your comments about rising FA quality criteria. --Brian McNeil / talk 23:45, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Interesting article, interesting topic. Meets criteria. Overall a good candidate. Also (not that it matters) it's the best, if not only, english language article covering the decision. Cocoaguytalkcontribs ‽ 19:03, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
 * . Was just waiting to see a 2nd opinion, and largely agree with how Cocoaguy puts this. (And, I'm popping in another long-overlooked candidate above. --Brian McNeil / talk 21:32, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
 * This is solid news coverage. Granted, a lot of great articles might cause the bar to rise a bit; a little bar-raising isn't necessarily a bad thing, within reason, but — ultimately, FA status is not a zero sum game.  A deserving article should get listed.  --Pi zero (talk) 01:41, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

successful Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 17:20, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

A portrait of Scotland: Gallery reopens after £17.6 million renovation
Another "cultural" opening/press preview. I overheard one of the other journalists commenting to a colleague he'd to write 750 words on the reopening of the portrait gallery. It seemed a little,... terse to try and cover the event so briefly. So, angling for another FA to add to my list. --Brian McNeil / talk 10:33, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

 * as author and nominator. --Brian McNeil / talk 10:33, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
 * passes the criteria swimmingly. --Pi zero (talk) 14:27, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
 * for shaming said journo in such and artful way (pun intended) --RockerballAustralia c 22:00, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Rockerball, I need an explanation on your comment. One beyond "No sleep 'til Brixton". --Brian McNeil / talk 22:58, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Something of "cultural importance" is worth more than 750 word (I think this is about twice as long). And, I'm liking the way the article is laid out. --RockerballAustralia c 10:40, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * My count, including maybe a few dozen words of image captions but filtering out artifacts like templates and apostrophe-s possessives, came to 2493 words. --Pi zero (talk) 17:33, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

 * Blood Red Sandman (Talk)   (Contribs) 16:24, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

 * Promoting as successful per votes, with the IP address comment taken as a vote of support from someone most definitely not involved in any way with the production of this piece. --Brian McNeil / talk 12:53, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

'Fascinating' and 'provocative' research examines genetic elements of bipolar, schizophrenia
A really extraordinary piece. My favorite comment from the comments page:
 * Excellent article. Best one out there on this subject right now and extremely up-to-date. Usually articles on this subject re-hash the same old ideas ad nauseam, but this was actually fascinating and provocative, as the title suggests. Gives me a new respect for Wikinews for sure. — 74.205.176.200

 * as nominator. --Pi zero (talk) 16:13, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
 * --Hallows AG (talk) 06:13, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
 * as author. Probably the best thing I've ever produced (with some behind-the-scenes help). Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 11:14, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
 * . More in-depth, more 'hard' scientific input, and a month prior to the BBC mentioing the same study. --Brian McNeil / talk 01:14, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

 * Assuming DenDodge's vote transfers to "support" on the basis of carried-out grammatical improvements, thus promoting as successful. --Brian McNeil / talk 14:22, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Military plane crashes in Chilean Juan Fernández Archipelago; reports say no survivors
I've got a feeling that this article, though not completely "original", is one of the best works I've ever done here, and deserves to be a FA. アンパロ Io ti odio! 05:52, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Two things that strike me as odd in the English used here; "national chain" and "our dear fat". Can we get those fixed? Other than that, I'd be delighted to support. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 17:05, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
 * , provided the English is fixed. DEN  DODGE  George Watson  19:25, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I think I've fixed everything (?) アンパロ Io ti odio! 00:57, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Would, perhaps, "our beloved fat [person]" be a better translation that "our loved fat [person]"? --Pi zero (talk) 01:04, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I believe so. アンパロ Io ti odio! 01:33, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I made one additional copyedit. --Pi zero (talk) 02:03, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Seems solid enough. --Pi zero (talk) 02:03, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Blood Red Sandman (Talk)   (Contribs) 17:11, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
 * . Would that we'd more contributors like Diego; many native English speakers need more remedial work on their submissions. --Brian McNeil / talk 00:57, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

 * Closing as successful; great article, meets all the criteria. --Brian McNeil'' / talk 10:38, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Out of space in outer space: Special report on NASA's 'space junk' plans
Self-nominating this article, because it's long, in-depth, original reporting, and probably the best thing I've written to date. I'm not sure what more I can say. DEN DODGE  George Watson  11:35, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

 * I'm declaring an involvement before I vote; I offered a few suggestions behind-the-scenes here, and helped out with the emailing. Therefore, I approach with an inherent bias. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 13:09, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

 * Would pass the mark even as in-depth synthesis; and, the OR is cool. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 13:14, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
 * What BRS said. --Pi zero (talk) 17:33, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
 * As per BRS, some suggestions on lines of inquiry were made; but, for news reporting that's by-and-large the best collaboration to have. The story holds together from one person telling it, and Dendodge did an excellent job. --Brian McNeil / talk 00:54, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Per BRS. T ofutwitch11 ''' (T ALK ) 01:53, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Not passed, but with individual articles potentially facing individual nomination. Blood Red Sandman (Talk)   (Contribs) 17:46, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Proposal: Delist old articles that have not been peer reviewed
Given the importance we place on verifiability, &c., maybe we should delist articles that haven't been fully peer reviewed. Of course, it's always possible to review an old article, by just checking everything and placing the template on the talk page, but I don't think we should be featuring things that have not been verified and looked over by a reviewer to the standards we currently require. This probably isn't the best place for this (and it's really only a very minor issue anyway), but I figured this is where it would receive the most attention. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dendodge (talk • contribs) 12:16, 6 August 2011

 * Since the issue raised is one of FA status, imo this is the right place to discuss it. --Pi zero (talk) 13:55, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

 * Our archives do contain some really quite poor articles because there was no requirement that each one be scrutinized by a reviewer — but FA candidates presumably were scrutinized, by the community, so the lack-of-standards argument seems to me inapplicable to FAs as a class.
 * It's not clear that our standards for the highest quality work have changed all that much. If there is concern with one or more specific FAs from the before, they should be nominated individually for delisting.  --Pi zero (talk) 13:55, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

 * , but there are some that should probably be individually considered for removal. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 13:56, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
 * , per sound analysis by, diff. -- Cirt (talk) 05:25, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

 * With general support, no outright opposition and much time available for comment, I'm closing this as passed. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 15:18, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Payment pending; Canadian recording industry set for six billion penalties?
This was submitted previously, and there was some dispute due to certain people finding the article non-neutral and perhaps not understanding how things work when dealing with large corporation's legal and PR people.

As far as I'm concerned, this was the most comprehensive coverage of the issue, and I'd people from Wikipedia confirm their opinion was it did not breach NPOV. --Brian McNeil / talk 12:20, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

 * Surely you meant to say "$6 billion in penalties" instead of "six billion penalties"? :( I hope that error is reversible under the archive policy, because this article at first glance looks great! I'll take a closer look at the NPOV claims if the error in the title can be fixed. Ragettho (talk) 04:58, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I'll defer to someone else's opinion, but as it is now archived a rename (leaving redirect) is technically possible. The NPoV "concerns" were that, shall we say, "I didn't 'assume good faith'" when I was directed to the blog of a lawyer supposed to be an expert on the matter; in reality, said lawyer was a paid lobbyist to the Canadian parliament, for the music industry. Numerous stated points by that lawyer were factually inaccurate - if not outright lies. The individual raising these concerns had no experience of Original Reporting, or of dealing with lawyers, public relations people, or spin-doctors. (New Zealand) found those allegations unsubstantiated, or justified. --Brian McNeil / talk 16:51, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

 * After careful reconsideration of the issues raised. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 13:06, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

 * There's really no NPOV issue here, IMHO. This is an excellent article, and it covers the issue very well (I'd be willing to bet it's the best coverage there is). The issues raised aren't enough to keep it from being featured, in my judgement. DEN  DODGE  George Watson  20:30, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

 * I'd have to agree with Dendodge here. --RockerballAustralia c 05:13, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

 * Closed as failing, with one dissenting vote. --Brian McNeil / talk 14:37, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Small Texas town hosts large baseball tournament
Considering that the article is about a single event, I believe it covered the event properly and broadly. I had a heavy amount of OR and lots of photos (admittedly, the photo layout isn't quite as perfect as I'd like, but it's hard to get those photos to behave with wiki-markup!!) It may not be the longest article to ever reach FA status, but I think it hits all the needed marks. --Bddpaux (talk) 19:09, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Votes

 * It's a perfectly good article. I enjoyed it; simple, unassuming, and the pictures were fun.  There's no need to measure it against FA status; it's happy being what it is, and simply doesn't move in the FA social circle.  In terms of the at-a-minimum FA criteria, one would say it doesn't qualify as comprehensive.  --Pi zero (talk) 19:54, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, as nominator, I suppose I'm morally obligated to support my own work! :]     --Bddpaux (talk) 21:36, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Pi zero hits the nail on the head; this is much, much too short even by the standards of the shortest FAs. Comprehensiveness is not achieved. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 13:13, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
 * On similar grounds to those expressed by Pi zero. I'm aware you favour short articles, and the only way I could see something of this length qualifying as featured would be with exceptional, and - of course - comprehensive, multimedia content. --Brian McNeil / talk 14:03, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

 * Promoted with no objections at-all. --Brian McNeil / talk 20:03, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

No surprises for sport in 2012/2013 Australian federal budget
While it is difficult to get pictures for this article, I think it meets most of the rest of the criteria. I believe it covers the article comprehensively and it is a topic the rest of the Australian media ignored when they were covering the federal budget discussion. The article was primarily original research despite the sources at the bottom as it required looking through the budget information to get details. Several opinions were also included from people in the Australian sport sector. Yes, kind of lame to say: NO NEWS! but they gave comments.

Comments
Can we get a final ruling here? --Bddpaux (talk) 04:57, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Votes

 * As nominator. --LauraHale (talk) 02:58, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
 * ; this is in-depth and, as stated in the nomination, covers an under-reported issue quite comprehensively. Part of the strength of Wikinews is getting away from following the mainstream on everything. --Brian McNeil / talk 09:52, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
 * As brianmc says. Comprehensive on an under-reported story.  Some FAs have images as a particular strength, and this isn't one of those, but it does well enough; as noted, the topic isn't scintillating with opportunities for action shots.  --Pi zero (talk) 13:50, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I felt this was pretty solid on review. Nice use of primary sources, too. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 22:47, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
 * ....save for one niggly little bit. The dollar amounts in that last paragraph get rather exhausting to read. (It's just a mind over numbers thing, that's all.) I'm all for inverted pyramid style, that's how it works here, but I'm not sure where that final paragraph fits into that model. In the end, though, I love to see any writer here going where others dare to tread. --Bddpaux (talk) 01:45, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

 * Withdrawn Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 15:06, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Non-sponsors' logos plastered by peeved Paralympians
While very short, I think it covers the topic comprehensively in terms of an interview. The whole thing was original research from an interview with a pair of Australian Paralympians. We had written notes and sound for it. The article was worked on and referenced during the Wikimedia Australia Wikinews workshop. The topic is one the Australian media, because their commercial nature, cannot cover but we at Wikinews were able to. It has pictures that were taken specifically for the article.

Comments
As first time nominator for this, would it be okay to withdraw this as it isn't going to pass and I have better understanding of criteria? How would I do that? --LauraHale (talk) 22:49, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I can just close it down now. :) Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 15:05, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Votes

 * As nominator. --LauraHale (talk) 02:58, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
 * This is a solid article. It doesn't feel comprehensive, though — a feeling about not the interview, but the surrounding non-sponsorship story.  --Pi zero (talk) 14:00, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Here's the deal:I'm gonna say No. Here's why: this article is a PICTURE-PERFECT EXAMPLE of how a slanted POV can creep into an article. See, I think that, for an article to reach FA status, that it really needs to adhere to both the LETTER and the SPIRIT of the law here. I liked this article....heck, I'm a social worker and I've spent GOBS of my life working with handicapped people. I like the take on things here and I'm sympathetic to their stand....this is insightful. But, just by the way it's presented here, a "big companies are bad"-tone slant starts to creep in. I might've even readied this article for publication, but it's just not FA material.......it just isn't, it might be close, but it doesn't get all the way there.....I'm sorry.Bddpaux (talk) 19:15, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
 * We may actually be talking about the same thing, at least in a sense; but, interestingly, while we've both taken the same position on the nomination, I don't agree there's bias in it. It's an interview, and as such it mainly reports what the interviewee said.  What very little information is there other than what the interviewee said, I don't think supports a charge of bias.  I don't see the "big companies are bad" slant you're describing.  But here of course I'm coming back to my point about comprehensiveness:  one way, at least, to make a comprehensive article on this subject would have been to expand it into the background of the issue being protested about, in an investigative journalism sort of way, and then there would be a significant amount of information beyond what the interviewee said, hence more to be careful of re neutrality.  --Pi zero (talk) 20:23, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

 * for simple lack of depth. We have a handful of unusually short FAs; they are generally exceptional, really stand out in spite of their length, and are in any event significantly more detailed than this. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 22:45, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Sandra Fluke insists she will not be silenced
I nominate this article for featured status. Around late February and early March, I noticed a number of stories that were of high quality and brought a visual angle through the use of video. This article taps the C-SPAN video library and the U.S. presidential archive. It is one of several stories that are influencing me right now, and I'm wanting people to see it and tell them, "Hey, look what Wikinews can do!" Crtew (talk) 15:11, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Votes

 * as nominator! Crtew (talk) 15:11, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * , thanks very much for the kind words. ;) -- Cirt (talk) 15:55, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
 * It's a bit borderline in FA terms, but the use of video is certainly exemplary. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 14:27, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Sure....y'know, content-wise....it is borderline just based on content alone to be FA.....but it's just so darned pretty! I say yes! Bddpaux (talk) 20:49, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Eh. Content-shomtent. It's long enough to me and it has two videos. So I'm ok with it. --Patrick M (TUFKAAP) (talk) 14:44, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Well written article. Well researched.  Well done? :) --LauraHale (talk) 02:59, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
 * , in the whole for same reasons as Laura; a well-written piece, and use of video is exploiting the online medium. --Brian McNeil / talk 09:49, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

 * Closed as SUCCESSFUL and promoted to FA.
 * Was open a long time, not a single oppose vote. --Brian McNeil / talk 09:01, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

'Davos man' versus 'Camp Igloo'; 42nd World Economic Forum convenes in Swiss alps
Before the Syrian article (below), I managed to pull a bunch of video stuff together for this article. It also is fairly in-depth. So, subbing as potential FA. --Brian McNeil / talk 11:02, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Votes

 * One of several stories around the same at Wikinews that broke new ground in combining video and print! Another great example of what Wikinews can do. In this, both the Sandra Fluke and the Syrian citizen journalist pieces, also stands out. Crtew (talk) 15:11, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * , great use of citizen journalism, multiple types of media sources, and article compilation and construction. -- Cirt (talk) 17:35, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
 * This was fantastic research. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 14:28, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Appears to tick all the boxes. --LauraHale (talk) 03:02, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
 * vote for my own article. Glad to see some of the comments here in the FAC, it's always good to push the envelope on what we can do. The main problem I experienced in creating this, and in other articles with video content, is time; transcoding and whatnot is slow. There is, if we're going to do more stuff like this, going to be a need to be able to throw quite a bit of CPU power at video clip rendering and transcoding. And, were we to start looking to do ~40-minute length items (a reasonable length for a 'real' news/current affairs programme), we'd need to have a back-door into uploading that onto Wikimedia Commons. --Brian McNeil / talk 14:06, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

 * Closed as UNSUCCESSFUL; requisite feedback obtained on the article. --Brian McNeil / talk 09:00, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

England's elderly face human rights breaches in home care system
I don't hold an enormous amount of confidence on this getting FA; I've written many a longer article, and done an awful lot of more detailed stuff. But, I would value the feedback that goes with an FAC review being applied to this. Essentially, I'm using the review process to (forgive the word choice) ask for a post-mortem on this article.

It's pure synthesis, which in my opinion/experience means our work needs to grind the mainstream press into the dirt. Does it do that? I'd completely forgotten about writing it, utterly forgotten and only noted it when looking for Human Rights stuff for unrelated reasoning. It didn't draw a lot of comments, but the two it did, indicate that the elderly people who've still got most of their bag of marbles likely found it a compelling read. Enough for FA? Dunno. But, we learn as a community; how, in a timely manner, do people think - if this doesn't merit FA status - it could have been elevated to that? --Brian McNeil / talk 23:03, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Comments

 * Obviously hopeless for FA as-per the depth issues raised above, but in terms of feedback: This seems about as far as synthesis might easily go in this case. That's a long way from being able to trout mainstream. One possible pure-synthesis route would be to look for extensive background; off the top of my head, have issues like this been raised in Parliament? Has there been litigation from home care failures? Have charities been campaigning for these improvements? On the OR side of things, a few cool options also spring to mind; get some elderly English people on the phone, perhaps, or talk to a selection of MPs on their responses (bonus points for any politicians haned certain responsibilities relevant to this). Tracking down some people who actually provide home care would also be excellent. These are problematic OR targets in that both carers and their patients are likely to want to be anonymous. Nonetheless, these are my immediate impressions on what may have elevated this to exceptionally good. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 12:29, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Private Eye is chock-full of stories of major failings in the, largely privatised, care of the elderly. <cough>, <cough> Southern Cross et-al. --Brian McNeil'' / talk 12:46, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Well... I recall lots of care homes (Southern Cross, etc), but I'm not sure offhand how much home care. Although... I'd feel fairly safe assuming the answer to all these is 'yes'. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 16:12, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Votes

 * The article hasn't been archived, so is not at this time eligible for nomination. --Pi zero (talk) 20:22, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Spain starts 2013 IPC Alpine World Championships with first and fifth place finishes
This one deserve FA if only for the EXCELLENT photos!! --Bddpaux (talk) 19:53, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Comments

 * Not eligible for nomination until it's been archived. ---Pi zero (talk) 20:16, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Votes
as nominator. --Bddpaux (talk) 19:54, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

 * Closed as successful. --Pi zero (talk) 16:57, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Same-sex marriage in the UK passes second reading in Commons
A fine piece of work, imho. --Pi zero (talk) 18:48, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Votes

 * as nominator. --Pi zero (talk) 18:48, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
 * all is good. --RockerballAustralia c 00:36, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
 * as primary contributor. —Tom Morris (talk) 07:04, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Really well written piece. --LauraHale (talk) 07:49, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
 * As above -- CalF (talk) 23:46, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Fine piece of work. Was enough to get me to fire off a message to my local MP. Hawkeye7 (talk) 18:54, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

 * Closed as successful. --Pi zero (talk) 20:45, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Wikinews interviews Aurélien Miralles about Sirenoscincus mobydick species discovery
I found this a fascinating look at the discovery of a new species. It certainly has great pictures, which have been useful for various topics on various projects. It appeals, I suppose, to the science geek in me. --Pi zero (talk) 01:09, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Votes

 * as nominator. --Pi zero (talk) 01:09, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
 * --Gryllida 00:29, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Per nominator though I'm not a huge science geek. --LauraHale (talk) 13:54, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
 * . We weren't first to report on this, AFP ran a small piece a little over a week earlier. But, going straight to the involved scientists gives a more-interesting read. --Brian McNeil / talk 14:37, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I have to agree....an excellent read! --Bddpaux (talk) 19:43, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Does not seem like good reading material. Cmckain14 (talk) 18:35, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Very nice. Raystorm (talk) 21:01, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Fascinating article. Hawkeye7 (talk) 18:55, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

 * Closed as successful. --Pi zero (talk) 18:46, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Wikinews interviews Spain's most decorated Paralympian, Teresa Perales
Engaging interview. (Disclosure: I reviewed it.)  --Pi zero (talk) 02:12, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Votes

 * as nominator. --Pi zero (talk) 02:12, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
 * as a contributpr. :D I personally believe this is one of the best interviews I have done on Wikinews. --LauraHale (talk) 13:50, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Goes well beyond narrow sports focus, and probably is the best interview Laura has done for WIkinews. It's an engaging read that will still be relevant reading for a considerable time. --Brian McNeil / talk 14:29, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
 * It's well-written and interesting, and I enjoyed reading it.--Bill william compton (talk) 19:33, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
 * as contributor, really cool interview. Raystorm (talk) 12:02, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

 * Closed as . — Mike moral  ♪♫  06:01, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Three cities submit bids for 2020 Summer Olympics

 * Self nomination, but I think it is a good summary of the merits of the three major bids for the Olympic Games, has a nice use of images, is comprehensive without being overly long and wordy. It also gives an idea of the process, which assisted in making it newsworthy. --LauraHale (talk) 16:52, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Votes

 * I've the impression this may have been the best comprehensive coverage out there, other coverage being focused on some one bid. In any case, it is good overall coverage.  --Pi zero (talk) 17:01, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
 * as nominator and major contributor. --LauraHale (talk) 13:50, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
 * , largely for same reasons as Pi zero; this is where Wikinews can do well on news generally covered by the mainstream, as already-stated, the obvious reason to do so is to cover all bids, not just the one of a paper's home nation. --Brian McNeil / talk 14:27, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Excellent coverage. Hawkeye7 (talk) 18:53, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

 * Closed as successful FA candidate, and promoting. --Brian McNeil / talk 20:06, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

ACLU President Strossen on religion, drugs, guns and impeaching George Bush

 * How this one missed a nomination for five years is, ... Well' I'm nominating it now. --Brian McNeil / talk 10:12, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Votes
it:Wikinotizie:Vetrina/Segnalazioni
 * as just the sort of stuff we need more of. --Brian McNeil / talk 10:12, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Yup. —Tom Morris (talk) 00:15, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
 * , per the first support comment by, above. -- Cirt (talk) 00:30, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Support per rational provided by others. --LauraHale (talk) 20:49, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
 * When you're right, you're right. --Pi zero (talk) 21:33, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Agree. CalF (talk) 22:18, 6 November 2012 (UTC)


text:
User talk:Gowtham avg

-- 15:33, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: User talk:Gowtham avg


text:
User talk:RalphBrianKimball

-- 15:36, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:RalphBrianKimball


text:
User talk:Mariolaz

-- 15:36, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mariolaz


text:
User talk:Today... I'm Proud

-- 15:38, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Today... I'm Proud


text:
User talk:Yusufh2011

-- 15:39, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Yusufh2011


text:
User talk:Matthew seun

-- 15:39, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Matthew seun


text:
User talk:ASHOK DESHMUKH 1957

-- 15:42, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:ASHOK DESHMUKH 1957


text:
User talk:Myhnet

-- 15:42, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Myhnet


text:
User talk:Zorkin1

-- 15:44, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Zorkin1


text:
User talk:Lizpriestman

-- 15:44, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lizpriestman


text:
User talk:Gerarp

-- 15:45, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gerarp


text:
User talk:Smintheus Fellin

-- 15:45, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Smintheus Fellin


text:
User talk:Computertxpert

-- 15:47, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Computertxpert


text:
User talk:Piratekz

-- 15:49, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Piratekz


text:
User talk:Mjrc1993

-- 15:53, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mjrc1993


text:
User talk:Kawasaki Marketer

-- 15:55, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kawasaki Marketer


text:
User talk:Justysia4321

-- 15:59, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Justysia4321


text:
User talk:Hwk10

-- 16:04, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hwk10


text:
User talk:Videsutaltastet

-- 16:05, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Videsutaltastet


text:
User talk:Paoloamori

-- 16:06, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Paoloamori


text:
User talk:Saivisal1

-- 16:07, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Saivisal1


text:
User talk:Antster1983

-- 16:07, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Antster1983


text:
User talk:Sportyman hue86

-- 16:09, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sportyman hue86


text:
User talk:Crjosephs9

-- 16:12, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Crjosephs9


text:
User talk:Fredyb.94

-- 16:13, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Fredyb.94


text:
User talk:Cezve

-- 16:13, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Cezve


text:
User talk:Eric Perraudeau

-- 16:13, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Eric Perraudeau


text:
User talk:林慶台

-- 16:13, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:林慶台


text:
User talk:Pwrgreg007

-- 16:15, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Pwrgreg007


text:
User talk:Mitdesai

-- 16:18, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mitdesai


text:
User talk:McLennonSon

-- 16:19, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:McLennonSon


text:
User talk:,remdoğaakgül

-- 16:19, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:,remdoğaakgül


text:
User talk:Jirvinho

-- 16:21, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jirvinho


text:
User talk:Bmac1972

-- 16:22, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bmac1972


text:
User talk:Salkkarifani

-- 16:23, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Salkkarifani


text:
User talk:Pasqualesax.12

-- 16:23, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Pasqualesax.12


text:
User talk:Martosportos

-- 16:25, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Martosportos


text:
User talk:Isaac.alexandre

-- 16:26, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Isaac.alexandre


text:
User talk:Amy2313

-- 16:26, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Amy2313


text:
User talk:YazanAlt

-- 16:27, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:YazanAlt


text:
User talk:Millydoll

-- 16:31, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Millydoll


text:
User talk:LuehmannDaniel

-- 16:32, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:LuehmannDaniel


text:
User talk:Rjjvirusx

-- 16:32, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rjjvirusx


text:
User talk:SpaceRocker

-- 16:34, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Joseph P Kennedy III - Becomes Standard Bearer for Family Political Dynasty
Hi. I've left comments in a cleanup template on the article page (representative of some of the problems the article would have to overcome before it could pass review to be published). I don't see that the statement is under terms of copyright that would allow it to be reproduced in its entirety like that (do you know differently?); I'm not sure what Michael Steenbergen's relation to the article is; and in any case it's evidently three-day-old news, which means it's already "stale" for our purposes — there would have to be new information come to light, or a new focal news event; see WN:fresh.

If you've questions — about our review practices, house style, wiki markup — just ask. There's also a lot of good information pointed to by the howdy template at the top of this user talk page. --Pi zero (talk) 20:11, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

 * Correctly formatted Source entries use the source template; it doesn't involve creating a template for the particular source. Please take a look at the edits I've made to the article, including the edit summary-descriptions, .  --Pi zero (talk) 21:19, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

I've learned a lot from those changes and am reformatting. I can not change title of article? I wanted to eliminate the bias. Also I've added a fuller bio source form just 2 day ago. I understand news cycles but thee is very little information in public about this person. I am a Democratic activist and want to be factual, and eliminate any bias that comes through in my phrases. - --SpaceRocker

Edits Complete
Pi Zero, I tried to address all of your concerns. Three issues remain: The Title is possibly biased, Freshness is in the last 12 to 24 hours, and is there enoug info in the article to justify publication. Thanks SpaceRocker (talk) 22:26, 8 January 2012 (UTC) SpaceRocker

THANK YOU Pi Zero
Thanks for the efforts on fixing the article. You taught me a lot very quickly. Even if this is not news any longer and does not publish, or is too sparce, I now see how the system works. Taking time to fix my sources format and teach me what to do, and then fix title nd external links. Wow, I appreciate your time and am humbled.

 * As you may have observed, I reviewed it as not ready. I gather you've seen the history of edits during review.  My review comments are on the article talk page.

 * Regarding activism: Wikinewsies have political opinions too. :-)  Occasionally one may have to disqualify oneself from a story due to WN:COI, but just feeling strongly about a story needn't disqualify; one can get quite skilled at writing a neutral story regardless of personal feelings (a valuable skill for any citizen of the world, imo :-).  Indeed, activist contributors seem to me to have a vested interest in the neutrality, accuracy, and all-around journalistic integrity of Wikinews, as those things make the project a stronger venue in which to publish stories one wants to be taken seriously.

 * I'm glad I was available and could be of help. --Pi zero (talk) 23:46, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Agree Article Not Ready - Do I Kill It Somehow
Dear Pi Zero, there will be another round of "freshness" in about two to four weeks when/if he officially enters the race. Can I keep writing on drafts for this time period or should I kill this story/article and recreate a new one at the appropriate time? I understand I need to focus in on the actual news event this next time, which is the Congressional seat.

 * If you'd like, I can move the article to your user space, and you can work on it there until you're ready to move it back into mainspace and submit it for review. (I believe you should be able to rename the article yourself once your user account has been registered for more than four days.)  --Pi zero (talk) 00:05, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Yes, Pi Zero if you would move the article to my space that would be good.
BTW I really appreciate your killing those faulty source pages I created. Thanks.

 * ✅: User:SpaceRocker/Joseph P Kennedy III considers run for US Congress
 * --Pi zero (talk) 01:12, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:SpaceRocker


text:
User talk:Indshailendra

-- 16:34, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Indshailendra


text:
User talk:Gertraud und Hermann Dulle

-- 16:36, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gertraud und Hermann Dulle


text:
User talk:Syhzaidi

-- 16:36, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Syhzaidi


text:
User talk:Atamuli

-- 16:36, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Atamuli


text:
User talk:Opwerty

-- 16:36, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Opwerty


text:
User talk:Shakeeka

-- 16:41, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Shakeeka


text:
User talk:Red Texas

-- 16:44, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Red Texas


text:
User talk:Realwinsf

-- 16:47, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Realwinsf


text:
User talk:Agokor

-- 16:48, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Agokor


text:
User talk:Praetorianbgx

-- 16:48, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Praetorianbgx


text:
User talk:Shairazi

-- 16:50, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Shairazi


text:
User talk:Batin duka

-- 16:53, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Batin duka


text:
User talk:AnINSPIRIT

-- 16:57, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:AnINSPIRIT


text:
User talk:Daniel0496

-- 16:57, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Daniel0496


text:
User talk:Agnesladjev

-- 16:59, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Agnesladjev


text:
User talk:Edinsopatricio

-- 16:59, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Edinsopatricio


text:
User talk:Pisces Rabbit Orberfield

-- 17:02, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Pisces Rabbit Orberfield


text:
User talk:Sraguraman

-- 17:04, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sraguraman


text:
User talk:Kanye West

-- 17:05, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kanye West


text:
User talk:Dacce

-- 17:08, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dacce


text:
User talk:GrupomusicologíaCLAJ

-- 17:10, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:GrupomusicologíaCLAJ


text:
User talk:Ismaelhassan

-- 17:11, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ismaelhassan


text:
User talk:Nomindbody

-- 17:13, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nomindbody


text:
User talk:JulieNolwenn

-- 17:16, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:JulieNolwenn


text:
User talk:Steinarbe

-- 17:16, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Steinarbe


text:
User talk:AchHerrje

-- 17:17, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:AchHerrje


text:
User talk:Abmovies4u

-- 17:21, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Abmovies4u


text:
User talk:Dan7en

-- 17:24, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dan7en


text:
User talk:XXGiuXx

-- 17:24, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:XXGiuXx


text:
User talk:Diyae

-- 17:25, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Diyae


text:
User talk:Saiful1994

-- 17:27, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Saiful1994


text:
User talk:Dirtydoze

-- 17:27, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dirtydoze


text:
User talk:Kyawkyawmoe

-- 17:27, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kyawkyawmoe


text:
User talk:Zafar hayat

-- 17:27, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Zafar hayat


text:
User talk:Luisgast

-- 17:29, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Luisgast


text:
User talk:Josh11

-- 17:30, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Josh11


text:
User talk:Glatisant

-- 17:31, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Glatisant


text:
User talk:Eveha

-- 17:31, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Eveha


text:
User talk:Marjetica123

-- 17:37, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Marjetica123


text:
User talk:Nicolas.geslot

-- 17:38, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nicolas.geslot


text:
User talk:Kambadprashant

-- 17:39, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kambadprashant


text:
User talk:Agiantleap

-- 17:41, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Agiantleap


text:
User talk:Muhammedaksu

-- 17:44, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Muhammedaksu


text:
User talk:Epanokamelavkion

-- 17:44, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Epanokamelavkion


text:
User talk:ThangLong.HoangNhatMinh

-- 17:46, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:ThangLong.HoangNhatMinh


text:
User talk:Tomdanme

-- 17:46, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tomdanme


text:
User talk:IRAD64

-- 17:48, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:IRAD64


text:
User talk:Aigaiopelagitis2

-- 17:48, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Aigaiopelagitis2


text:
User talk:Petr Zumr

-- 17:49, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Petr Zumr


text:
User talk:Streetroach

-- 17:50, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Streetroach


text:
User talk:Colfred

-- 17:52, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Colfred


text:
User talk:Fcomorfin

-- 17:52, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Fcomorfin


text:
User talk:CHELSEA chamberlain

-- 17:53, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:CHELSEA chamberlain


text:
User talk:Sajnay

-- 17:55, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sajnay


text:
User talk:Preetam~enwikinews

-- 17:55, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Preetam. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Preetam~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:23, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:36, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Preetam~enwikinews


text:
User talk:Ravimadhu2357

-- 17:59, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ravimadhu2357


text:
User talk:Akesbeh

-- 18:00, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Akesbeh


text:
User talk:SteelGuardian

-- 18:00, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:SteelGuardian


text:
User talk:AnnieMJac

-- 18:01, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:AnnieMJac


text:
User talk:Vercom5

-- 18:02, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Vercom5


text:
User talk:Babbar.shweta

-- 18:02, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Babbar.shweta


text:
User talk:Calvers36

-- 18:05, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Calvers36


text:
User talk:Sebacat

-- 18:05, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sebacat


text:
User talk:Ricochetmex

-- 18:07, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ricochetmex


text:
User talk:وائل الطائر

-- 18:07, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:وائل الطائر


text:
User talk:Ucanthackme75

-- 18:10, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ucanthackme75


text:
User talk:Munigala

-- 18:11, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Munigala


text:
User talk:Bgwainwright

-- 18:12, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bgwainwright


text:
User talk:Stugal53

-- 18:12, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Stugal53


text:
User talk:JOKER 75

-- 18:13, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:JOKER 75


text:
User talk:Heonsi

-- 18:17, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Heonsi


text:
User talk:Fadirra

-- 18:18, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Fadirra


text:
User talk:General Frost

-- 18:21, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:General Frost


text:
User talk:David Gallegos 97

-- 18:23, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:David Gallegos 97


text:
User talk:Antoniojose.garcia

-- 18:23, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Antoniojose.garcia


text:
User talk:Tariq6524

-- 18:28, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tariq6524


text:
User talk:Cerj17

-- 18:30, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Cerj17


text:
User talk:Joaquin fernando

-- 18:30, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Joaquin fernando


text:
User talk:İmren piser

-- 18:31, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:İmren piser


text:
User talk:Xtps

-- 18:32, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Xtps


text:
User talk:Rdhartwell

-- 18:32, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rdhartwell


text:
User talk:Aprilfish

-- 18:33, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Aprilfish


text:
User talk:PhilosMYK1978

-- 18:33, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:PhilosMYK1978


text:
User talk:Huseoz

-- 18:37, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Huseoz


text:
User talk:Hasan.Khweis

-- 18:42, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hasan.Khweis


text:
User talk:Sima e8

-- 18:43, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sima e8


text:
User talk:Tau.liu

-- 18:43, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tau.liu


text:
User talk:Rolyjohn

-- 18:44, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rolyjohn


text:
User talk:Animesh Basu

-- 18:45, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Animesh Basu


text:
User talk:Калныш

-- 18:47, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Калныш


text:
User talk:MeSGuL

-- 18:47, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:MeSGuL


text:
Template:DateDPL/doc

Help
This template generates a DPL for a specific date, and, when used on a project page, categorizes the project page. It is used primarily on project pages whose names have either form Wikinews:year/month/day or Wikinews:year/month, where month is the name of the month, and day is an integer with no leading zero. For example, 2012/January/1.

The DPL shows stable pages only, so be wary if using this template for a date from before the adoption of flaggedrevs review.

Usage
Call this template with the following three parameters.
 * The first unnamed parameter specifies the day of the month, so should be an integer with no leading zero.
 * The second unnamed parameter specifies the name of the month.
 * The third unnamed parameter specifies the year.

Technically the parameters are optional, and if omitted and the transcluding page is a project page as described above, the template extracts the omitted information from the name of the transcluding page. So 1 on any page would produce the same DPL as undefined on page 2012/January/1. However, those project pages are meant to provide their DPL when transcluded elsewhere, and this will not work right if the project page does not provide parameters to this template.

The following markup, used on a project DPL page for a day, fixes the appropriate parameter values:

For example, this markup on page 2012/January/1 would expand to.

Internals
This template categorizes the transcluding page only if the transcluding page is in project space. Categorization, if done, depends on the name of the transcluding page regardless of any parameters. Historically, pages were put in day or month categories, but this later became inconvenient because the month and day categories would then contain project pages that weren't articles. At this writing, pages go in Category:Date DPL pages and, if the first parameter isn't non-blank, Category:Date DPL pages missing parameters.

title: Template:DateDPL/doc


text:
User talk:Mircoboscan

-- 18:51, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mircoboscan


text:
User talk:Капетан Жељко

-- 18:52, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Капетан Жељко


text:
User talk:Kitten44

-- 18:55, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kitten44


text:
User talk:Bledonshinigami

-- 18:57, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bledonshinigami


text:
User talk:Suhoyle

-- 18:58, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Suhoyle


text:
User talk:Kyc99

-- 18:58, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kyc99


text:
User talk:Bunnystraw

-- 18:59, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bunnystraw


text:
User talk:Hashimrana1234

-- 18:59, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hashimrana1234


text:
User talk:Dustindthompson

-- 18:59, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dustindthompson


text:
User talk:Olcaiy

-- 19:00, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Olcaiy


text:
User talk:NcAdams

-- 19:05, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:NcAdams


text:
User talk:LuanAntony

-- 19:06, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:LuanAntony


text:
User talk:Theturtle232

-- 19:07, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Theturtle232


text:
User talk:Jenliz171

-- 19:07, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jenliz171


text:
User talk:Peranz

-- 19:10, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Peranz


text:
User talk:Motor-roller

-- 19:11, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Motor-roller


text:
User talk:Pepe Ruiz Ruiz

-- 19:13, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Pepe Ruiz Ruiz


text:
User talk:Wolferine71

-- 19:14, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Wolferine71


text:
User talk:Manson48

-- 19:15, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Manson48


text:
User talk:Sawsan Gemalmaz

-- 19:17, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sawsan Gemalmaz


text:
User talk:FirstCoastTerp

-- 19:18, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:FirstCoastTerp


text:
User talk:10x10design

-- 19:18, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:10x10design


text:
User talk:Indra2000

-- 19:19, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Indra2000


text:
User talk:Dwight Colville

-- 19:19, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dwight Colville


text:
User talk:ChefBrianFranklin

-- 19:21, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:ChefBrianFranklin


text:
User talk:Boris Stukov

-- 19:22, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Boris Stukov


text:
User talk:Fraans

-- 19:23, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Fraans


text:
User talk:Moon.noon82

-- 19:23, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Moon.noon82


text:
User talk:Proinsias2812

-- 19:27, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Proinsias2812


text:
User talk:Berlinu

-- 19:27, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Berlinu


text:
User talk:Mahiaralali

-- 19:28, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mahiaralali


text:
User talk:Piterlion

-- 19:30, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Piterlion


text:
User talk:რევაზ რიჟამაძე

-- 19:32, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:რევაზ რიჟამაძე


text:
User talk:Flobel

-- 19:36, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Flobel


text:
User talk:BigOne01

-- 19:36, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:BigOne01


text:
User talk:Salam deswal

-- 19:37, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Salam deswal


text:
User talk:Hhajamini

-- 19:39, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hhajamini


text:
User talk:Madjo1983

-- 19:40, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Madjo1983


text:
User talk:Caldape95

-- 19:42, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Caldape95


text:
User talk:Bulletproofzi

-- 19:43, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bulletproofzi


text:
User talk:Hoshihiro

-- 19:44, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hoshihiro


text:
User talk:4albatross

-- 19:46, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:4albatross


text:
User talk:Kyrtzuiop

-- 19:46, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kyrtzuiop


text:
User talk:Bebaboniss14

-- 19:50, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bebaboniss14


text:
User talk:淳和

-- 19:53, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:淳和


text:
User talk:Gilroberts

-- 19:53, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gilroberts


text: Comments:Wikinews:Briefs/December, 2006

title: Comments:Wikinews:Briefs/December, 2006


text:
User talk:Slava Moshkin

-- 19:54, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Slava Moshkin


text:
User talk:Renata Emma

-- 19:57, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Renata Emma


text:
User talk:Nathanward01

-- 20:01, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nathanward01


text:
User talk:أحمد محمد الدقره

-- 20:01, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:أحمد محمد الدقره


text:
User talk:دلير عزيز

-- 20:02, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:دلير عزيز


text:
User talk:Orangewhitegreen

-- 20:08, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Orangewhitegreen


text:
User talk:Dogliker8

-- 20:16, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dogliker8


text:
User talk:GrzywaczM

-- 20:17, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:GrzywaczM


text:
User talk:Whistler

-- 20:18, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Whistler


text:
User talk:Willygaopan

-- 20:22, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Willygaopan


text:
User talk:Keshavarzarmin

-- 20:24, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Keshavarzarmin


text:
User talk:NickMikesell

-- 20:24, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:NickMikesell


text:
User talk:Patrick Sabwe

-- 20:28, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Patrick Sabwe


text:
User talk:MrSmartathlete

-- 20:28, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:MrSmartathlete


text:
User talk:Elretornodelgigante

-- 20:28, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Elretornodelgigante


text:
User talk:FLORESITASSS

-- 20:30, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:FLORESITASSS


text:
User talk:Beezus99

-- 20:31, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Beezus99


text:
User talk:Polgár Lilla

-- 20:32, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Polgár Lilla


text:
User talk:Ali alilou

-- 20:32, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ali alilou


text:
User talk:Bossudenotredame

-- 20:33, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bossudenotredame


text:
User talk:Zantzant

-- 20:36, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Zantzant


text:
User talk:Gracefulally

-- 20:37, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gracefulally


text:
User talk:Hamzaok3

-- 20:38, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hamzaok3


text:
User talk:Wiechu18

-- 20:42, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Wiechu18


text:
User talk:Boki01

-- 20:43, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Boki01


text:
User talk:Doncorleone123

-- 20:44, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Doncorleone123


text:
User talk:Sajidrj

-- 20:45, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sajidrj


text:
User talk:MSS2308

-- 20:45, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:MSS2308


text:
User talk:Bghableh

-- 20:49, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bghableh


text:
User talk:Potenzacreative

-- 20:50, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Potenzacreative


text:
User talk:MysteryJaso

-- 20:50, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:MysteryJaso


text:
User talk:HerrRomanG

-- 20:53, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:HerrRomanG


text:
User talk:Evocomp

-- 20:58, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Evocomp


text:
User talk:MARTONZUMBA

-- 20:58, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:MARTONZUMBA


text:
User talk:Unreal7

-- 20:59, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Unreal7


text:
User talk:Lappon

-- 20:59, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lappon


text:
User talk:Synaptic2

-- 21:01, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Synaptic2


text:
User talk:AlexSquall

-- 21:03, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:AlexSquall


text:
User talk:Tomate Atômico

-- 21:04, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tomate Atômico


text:
User talk:Angelooooo

-- 21:05, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Angelooooo


text:
User talk:Baranpirooz

-- 21:06, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Baranpirooz


text:
User talk:Historicalguy

 dont destroy my nice article

-- 21:08, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Historicalguy


text:
User talk:Percyvald

-- 21:08, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Percyvald


text:
User talk:Luci Lucifax

-- 21:09, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Luci Lucifax


text:
User talk:BonToki

-- 21:11, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:BonToki


text:
User talk:JTaylor44

-- 21:11, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:JTaylor44


text:
User talk:Jantni

-- 21:12, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jantni


text:
User talk:Ilharafael

-- 21:12, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ilharafael


text:
User talk:Aliceasbury

-- 21:13, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Aliceasbury


text: Comments:Dr. Harvey B. Firestone, Observation checklist of accessible language


text:
Thread:Comments:Dr. Harvey B. Firestone, Observation checklist of accessible language/Comments from feedback form - "Harvey has other publications ..."

Harvey has other publications and accomplishments but the Checklist is his most famous ,other than his Joke Book! Donna Vincent —24.26.42.225 (talk) 21:15, 8 January 2012 (UTC)


text:
User talk:Davikrehalt

-- 21:15, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Davikrehalt


text:
User talk:Zoock4end

-- 21:15, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Zoock4end


text:
User talk:Haroun1

-- 21:16, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Haroun1


text:
User talk:Ellyer

-- 21:17, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ellyer


text:
User talk:JohnnyFly

-- 21:21, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:JohnnyFly


text:
User talk:Elvir1205

-- 21:22, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Elvir1205


text:
User talk:Gr7783&ce

-- 21:23, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gr7783&ce


text:
User talk:Bianessås

-- 21:24, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bianessås


text:
User talk:Roger.groult

-- 21:29, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Roger.groult


text:
User talk:José Luís Ávila Silveira

-- 21:30, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:José Luís Ávila Silveira


text:
User talk:ManawatuNZ

-- 21:31, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:ManawatuNZ


text:
User talk:Cyruskarimi

-- 21:33, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Cyruskarimi


text:
User talk:Isi747

-- 21:34, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Isi747


text:
User talk:Tauni Lemauni

-- 21:34, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tauni Lemauni


text:
User talk:OjoRevelador

-- 21:35, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:OjoRevelador


text:
User talk:42NVPX

-- 21:35, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:42NVPX


text:
User talk:Toni split

-- 21:35, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Toni split


text:
User talk:Chema22&22

-- 21:37, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Chema22&22


text:
User talk:Miquaz

-- 21:37, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Miquaz


text:
User talk:DANdm91

-- 21:39, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:DANdm91


text:
User talk:UP-ck

-- 21:43, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:UP-ck


text:
User talk:Javibarr

-- 21:45, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Javibarr


text:
User talk:Jaguar.jaz

-- 21:49, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jaguar.jaz


text:
User talk:Мирослав С

-- 21:51, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Мирослав С


text:
User talk:Insider210

-- 21:52, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Insider210


text:
User talk:Michal the greater

-- 21:55, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Michal the greater


text:
User talk:Shahab khan barech

-- 21:55, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Shahab khan barech


text:
User talk:Movies50012

-- 21:56, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Movies50012


text:
User talk:Notkani1

-- 21:56, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Notkani1


text:
User talk:Ferachry

-- 21:56, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ferachry


text:
User talk:Angelika Lindner

-- 21:57, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Angelika Lindner


text:
User talk:Perodactilo

-- 22:02, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Perodactilo


text:
User talk:E.ayoub

-- 22:03, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:E.ayoub


text:
User talk:Harleyzangel

-- 22:04, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Harleyzangel


text:
User talk:MBelfer

-- 22:05, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:MBelfer


text:
User talk:Dopstar

-- 22:06, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dopstar


text:
User talk:Nicolas4280

-- 22:06, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nicolas4280


text:
User talk:Vasya189

-- 22:07, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Vasya189


text:
User talk:Nailah Browder

-- 22:09, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nailah Browder


text:
User talk:Albedery

-- 22:10, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Albedery


text:
User talk:Kyrraviper

-- 22:11, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kyrraviper


text:
User talk:Youmin Wang

-- 22:11, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Youmin Wang


text:
User talk:Fishmilk4all

-- 22:12, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Fishmilk4all


text:
User talk:Marthamcnew

-- 22:12, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Marthamcnew


text:
User talk:S.mereu

-- 22:13, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:S.mereu


text:
User talk:54enesfy

-- 22:13, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:54enesfy


text:
User talk:Shevazs

-- 22:13, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Shevazs


text:
User talk:Hamza El Fasiki

-- 22:16, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hamza El Fasiki


text:
User talk:GioCIM

-- 22:19, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:GioCIM


text:
User talk:AvonHumboldt

-- 22:20, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:AvonHumboldt


text:
User talk:Skytparther

-- 22:24, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Skytparther


text:
User talk:MimiK75

-- 22:25, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:MimiK75


text:
User talk:Sdjfwe9tuhrugh

-- 22:31, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sdjfwe9tuhrugh


text:
User talk:Лилияна

-- 22:31, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Лилияна


text:
User talk:Fifiote38

-- 22:34, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Fifiote38


text:
User talk:NetflixSoup

-- 22:36, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:NetflixSoup


text:
User talk:Hoffmann89

-- 22:39, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hoffmann89


text:
User talk:Андрей Серко

-- 22:40, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Андрей Серко


text:
User talk:BakerMarciano

???

-- 22:43, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:BakerMarciano


text:
User talk:Rubenfdez

-- 22:44, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rubenfdez


text:
User talk:Terraner87

-- 22:45, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Terraner87


text:
User talk:Pisson19

-- 22:48, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Pisson19


text:
User talk:Waleloye123

-- 22:48, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Waleloye123


text:
User talk:Szekeres.annie

-- 22:53, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Szekeres.annie


text:
User talk:Jose A Quesada Picado

-- 22:54, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jose A Quesada Picado


text:
User talk:Farbod4235

-- 22:55, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Farbod4235


text:
User talk:Osmar kennedy

-- 22:57, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Osmar kennedy


text:
User talk:Snafu87

-- 23:00, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Snafu87


text:
User talk:Iamthelotus

-- 23:02, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Iamthelotus


text:
User talk:Marinero HUGOALEJANDROMACIASZAMORA

-- 23:05, 8 January 2012 (UTC)


text:
User talk:Mokhalaa

-- 23:13, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mokhalaa


text:
User talk:Iradavidlevy

-- 23:14, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Iradavidlevy


text:
User talk:محمد شويخ

-- 23:16, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:محمد شويخ


text:
User talk:Anarchomonarchist

-- 23:19, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Anarchomonarchist


text:
User talk:Goldroom

-- 23:21, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Goldroom


text:
User talk:Amiryleila

-- 23:22, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Amiryleila


text:
User talk:Atethnekos

-- 23:23, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Atethnekos


text:
User talk:Nurface1

-- 23:24, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nurface1


text:
User talk:Ezzaid.med

-- 23:26, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ezzaid.med


text:
User talk:Alejandroacs2010

-- 23:32, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Alejandroacs2010


text:
User talk:Eastlanative

-- 23:34, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Eastlanative


text:
User talk:Memberonetoone

-- 23:34, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Memberonetoone


text:
User talk:Syllrose

-- 23:35, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Syllrose


text:
User talk:Guanchun

-- 23:36, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Guanchun


text:
User talk:Snagaraj13

-- 23:37, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Snagaraj13


text:
User talk:Geniam

-- 23:37, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Geniam


text:
User talk:Retrolezgi

-- 23:38, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Retrolezgi


text:
User talk:Cruiser80

-- 23:38, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Cruiser80


text:
User talk:Rickcavanaugh

-- 23:50, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rickcavanaugh


text:
User talk:Jensjackmeier

-- 23:57, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jensjackmeier


text:
User talk:Lnyman.novak

-- 23:58, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lnyman.novak


text:
User talk:VirtualNoize

-- 00:03, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:VirtualNoize


text:
User talk:Кирилл хохряков

-- 00:04, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Кирилл хохряков


text:
User talk:Andipoldi

-- 00:09, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Andipoldi


text:
User talk:Criggaisherenow

-- 00:10, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Criggaisherenow


text:
User talk:Yuliya Skanceva

-- 00:11, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Yuliya Skanceva


text:
User talk:Sergius63

-- 00:12, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sergius63


text:
User talk:Rojas.leonardo

-- 00:13, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rojas.leonardo


text:
User talk:Philistus

-- 00:13, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Philistus


text:
User talk:Loqsea456

-- 00:14, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Loqsea456


text:
User talk:Elite Italia18

-- 00:14, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Elite Italia18


text:
User talk:Phils2012zandd

-- 00:15, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Phils2012zandd


text:
User talk:TiboQorl

-- 00:22, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:TiboQorl


text:
User talk:OsredeckiJurica

-- 00:23, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:OsredeckiJurica


text:
User talk:Fason7

-- 00:30, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Fason7


text:
User talk:CalvanoBitoni

-- 00:32, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:CalvanoBitoni


text:
User talk:Theatralic

-- 00:37, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Theatralic


text:
User talk:DevSn

-- 00:39, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:DevSn


text:
User talk:Ahyxfkp

-- 00:39, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ahyxfkp


text:
User talk:Lucicm

-- 00:42, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lucicm


text:
User talk:Rightinformer

-- 00:46, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rightinformer


text:
User talk:Kategeor

-- 00:47, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kategeor


text:
User talk:Pgimer

-- 00:47, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Pgimer


text:
User talk:Amr agami

-- 00:48, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Amr agami


text:
User talk:Gssridhar

-- 00:50, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gssridhar


text:
User talk:Gsman97

-- 00:50, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gsman97


text:
User talk:Clinicw

-- 00:56, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Clinicw


text:
User talk:Loveunlimd

-- 00:59, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Loveunlimd


text:
User talk:Jneb802

-- 01:00, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jneb802


text:
User talk:123Des123

-- 01:04, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:123Des123


text:
User talk:MusicoVirreinal

-- 01:05, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:MusicoVirreinal


text:
User talk:Sundials

-- 01:25, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sundials


text:
User talk:Ichthyoid

-- 01:31, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ichthyoid


text:
User talk:Lsjdfopwr9gerhgj

-- 01:35, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lsjdfopwr9gerhgj


text:
User talk:Anton0628

-- 01:36, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Anton0628


text:
User talk:Madrizz leticia

-- 01:41, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Madrizz leticia


text:
User talk:Thinkandponder

-- 01:45, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Thinkandponder


text:
User talk:Shu0san

-- 01:45, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Shu0san


text:
User talk:SK0112

-- 01:46, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:SK0112


text:
User talk:Shaweya

-- 01:47, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Shaweya


text:
User talk:Gabriel998

-- 01:48, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gabriel998


text:
User talk:RichardBogue

-- 01:49, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:RichardBogue


text:
User talk:Airjackson

-- 01:52, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Airjackson


text:
User talk:Mikedstj

-- 01:54, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mikedstj


text:
User talk:Viengsak

-- 01:55, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Viengsak


text:
User talk:CCY Swim

-- 02:07, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:CCY Swim


text:
User talk:Surfnaveia69

-- 02:09, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Surfnaveia69


text:
User talk:Hammer of the Gods27

-- 02:12, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hammer of the Gods27


text:
User talk:Tharickt

-- 02:14, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tharickt


text:
User talk:Xpowerx77

-- 02:14, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Xpowerx77


text:
User talk:Vivian gxx

-- 02:16, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Vivian gxx


text:
User talk:Johnnie Ginger

-- 02:18, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Johnnie Ginger


text:
User talk:Paulb34

-- 02:20, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Paulb34


text:
User talk:Zainul muttaqin

-- 02:22, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Zainul muttaqin


text:
User talk:Finisher11

-- 02:23, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Finisher11


text:
User talk:Rygiemon

-- 02:27, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rygiemon


text:
User talk:Parf1984

-- 02:31, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Parf1984


text:
User talk:Sg4304

-- 02:33, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sg4304


text:
User talk:Fingeredeagle

-- 02:35, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Fingeredeagle


text:
User talk:X x DaRkNiGhT z Z

-- 02:39, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:X x DaRkNiGhT z Z


text:
User talk:Virgilio kaze

-- 02:39, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Virgilio kaze


text:
User talk:Zenith Hasan

-- 02:43, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Zenith Hasan


text:
User talk:Lcastanedam

-- 02:51, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lcastanedam


text:
User talk:Gabribeat

-- 02:57, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gabribeat


text:
User talk:Rainrock01325

-- 02:58, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rainrock01325


text:
User talk:Theskatemaster

-- 02:59, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Theskatemaster


text:
User talk:Kw92

-- 03:03, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kw92


text:
User talk:Mike Carnethon

-- 03:06, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mike Carnethon


text:
User talk:Boneswoon

-- 03:06, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Boneswoon


text:
User talk:Thanh Stupid

-- 03:08, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Thanh Stupid


text:
User talk:Xuejiawo

-- 03:15, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Xuejiawo


text:
User talk:Tinhyeuvinhcuu

-- 03:19, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tinhyeuvinhcuu


text:
User talk:Gsbhange

-- 03:21, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gsbhange


text:
User talk:Ltorvi

-- 03:22, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ltorvi


text:
User talk:Techaddictions

-- 03:23, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Techaddictions


text:
User talk:MonsterMMORPG

-- 03:27, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:MonsterMMORPG


text:
User talk:Jasonaedwards

-- 03:28, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jasonaedwards


text:
User talk:Bcself

-- 03:31, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bcself


text:
User talk:Timbalmarites

-- 03:32, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Timbalmarites


text:
User talk:Leoeloco0909

-- 03:33, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Leoeloco0909


text:
User talk:Anam basra

-- 03:33, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Anam basra


text:
User talk:Griff91

-- 03:33, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Griff91


text:
User talk:Gerardoestaba

-- 03:34, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gerardoestaba


text:
User talk:ElmoScoggins

-- 03:43, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:ElmoScoggins


text:
User talk:S2444029

-- 03:43, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:S2444029


text:
User talk:Candymanyyyy

-- 03:43, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Candymanyyyy


text:
User talk:Noseller

-- 03:45, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Noseller


text:
User talk:Mukulfaiz

-- 03:49, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mukulfaiz


text:
User talk:Raju2400

-- 03:49, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Raju2400


text:
User talk:Cacampuscochin

-- 03:50, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Cacampuscochin


text:
User talk:78souviens

-- 03:51, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:78souviens


text:
User talk:Scr099

-- 03:54, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Scr099


text:
User talk:Rprakash1782

-- 03:55, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rprakash1782


text:
User talk:Taycuong123

-- 04:00, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Taycuong123


text:
User talk:Saimondriche

-- 04:07, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Saimondriche


text:
User talk:Liliumofpeace

-- 04:10, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Liliumofpeace


text:
User talk:Prabhubadabas

-- 04:12, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Prabhubadabas


text:
User talk:Jenks24

-- 04:18, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jenks24


text:
User talk:Damians 86

-- 04:22, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Damians 86


text:
User talk:Kunjutrongtim

-- 04:28, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kunjutrongtim


text:
User talk:Arikae813

-- 04:32, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Arikae813


text:
User talk:Sta agata

-- 04:33, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sta agata


text:
User talk:มิยาโนะ

-- 04:36, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:มิยาโนะ


text:
User talk:Aldahuda

-- 04:36, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Aldahuda


text:
User talk:Balajiveera

-- 04:39, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Balajiveera


text:
User talk:Cumacevik

-- 04:45, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Cumacevik


text:
User talk:Jayeshjain88

-- 04:53, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jayeshjain88


text:
User talk:Iamnabi

-- 04:56, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Iamnabi


text:
User talk:Денис Александров

-- 04:56, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Денис Александров


text:
User talk:Sunilds

-- 04:58, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sunilds


text:
User talk:EIEEEE

-- 04:59, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:EIEEEE


text:
Observing the 2012 Human Trafficking Awareness Day in the US, and wider world

January 13, 2012

This week US citizens observed National Human Trafficking Awareness Day through acts of education, legislation, and enforcement; whilst, around the world, other people highlighted or tackled this global problem in their own countries.

According to an annual report on human trafficking released by the in June last year, 27 million men, women and children are exploited through human trafficking. Worldwide, at least two million children are estimated to be trafficked victims of the sex trade; and, in military conflicts, it is not uncommon for children to be forced to bear arms. In releasing the report last year, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton highlighted the importance of international cooperation in addressing trafficking, and cultural issues associated with it. Under the United Nations', human trafficking encompasses cases where victims are born into slavery, forcibly transported for exploitation, consented to work with a trafficker, and/or were forced to participate in criminal activities. The Protocols also recognize the unique status and rights of children.

US-based action
Reports from across the United States show a number of communities taking local action to solve, or otherwise highlight, this global problem.

In Southern California, Sister Caritas Foster is an advocate for the area's victims of human trafficking. Commenting on the area's involvement, she stated: "We in the San Francisco Bay Area are one of the largest receiving areas with our borders and coasts". For over four years, Foster has worked on educating the public on human trafficking, speaking to civic and religious groups and describing the power traffickers hold over their victims through vivid accounts of situations trafficked individuals find themselves in. Many have no idea where they are located, suffer under the constant threat of deportation, and most often lack the language abilities to seek help.

Los Angeles politician Don Knabe said human trafficking was not a distant problem but one that hits close to home. As the county supervisor overseeing the fourth district in Los Angeles County, Knabe cited figures from the Probation Department showing 84 percent of arrests of children on prostitution charges in 2010 were in his district; he believes the overall problem for the county is much larger, and wants the Probation Department to establish a special unit dedicated to sexually exploited minors.

Northward in, Washington, members of the King County Sheriff's department realized that law enforcement had to deal supportively with the symptoms of human trafficking — rather than putting victims in jail. This gave birth to the "Genesis Project" where sheriff's deputies offer potential victims of trafficking a comfortable safe haven with amenities for 24 hours, and put them in touch with social services for counselling, job training, and education advice.

Politicians from several states have sought to address the connection between tourism and human trafficking; Indiana's state Senate unanimously passed a human trafficking bill on Tuesday morning. Current legislation only considered forced marriage and prostitution as human trafficking; loopholes in the existing laws allowed some forms of human trafficking to escape prosecution. Lawmakers in the state hope to toughen their human trafficking laws, and have new legislation on the statute books in time for the, due to be held in on February 5. The just-passed bill now goes to the House for approval.

Also on Tuesday, lawmakers from Hawaii held a special hearing on human trafficking. Kathryn Xian, of Pacific Alliance to Stop Slavery, says traffickers capitalize on the state's tourist-based economy. She introduced a package of seven bills she says will help prevent human trafficking in the state.

At a national level, the US government continues to work abroad on the issue of trafficking; Luis CdeBaca, a special ambassador for human trafficking, is working with Myanmar, commonly known as Burma, as the country seeks to improve diplomatic relations with the United States. Myanmar was identified by the US State Department as having one of the worst records of forced labor, and as a country that lacks necessary laws to curb human trafficking.

Trafficking, the global picture
Although National Human Trafficking Awareness Day is a US-based effort to recognise, and highlight, this issue — as a topic of global concern being highlighted through the United Nations, others around the world continue efforts to increase public awareness and tackle trafficking.

Forty-six women from the international group Operation Mobilization sought to raise awareness by climbing Tanzania's. The summit is called "Uhuru Peak", with Uhuru meaning "freedom" in. Each of the non-professional climbers raised 10,000 to help those affected by human trafficking.

In the Middle East, several countries are reported to have problems with human traffickers recruiting unemployed gay Kenyan men to become sex slaves. Saudi Arabia and Qatar are supposedly the more-common destination countries into which Kenyans are lured with offers of high-paying jobs. However, in the United Arab Emirates — where no law prohibits trafficking, but homosexuality is illegal — the problem is compounded.

Enforcement of existing laws, and acting against trafficking, are seen as key steps in reducing the activity. Showing that no country is unaffected, Northern Ireland police are currently investigating five sex trafficking cases; and, on Monday, Filipino police rescued fifteen women following a tip-off regarding women recruited, and being held, prior to being sent to work abroad.

In the Northern Ireland situation, Detective Superintendent Philip Marshall stated that fifteen men are to be contacted, suspected of having paid for sex with trafficked women. Identifying victims within the UK, or victims seeking help, is becoming more challenging with the sex industry having switched to using hotel rooms as-opposed to street corners. Many victims of trafficking are found to be unaware of where within the country they are.

In the Philippines situation, police are still seeking the recruiter of the fifteen women rescued in Rio Hondo.

A range of complexities are involved in the sentencing of both those convicted of human trafficking, and their victims. In one Canadian case, 43-year-old Hungarian Lajos Domotor pled guilty to trafficking men and women into forced labor. Following being charged with conspiracy to commit human trafficking, he developed terminal stomach cancer and has been given a 10 to 15 percent chance of living five years.

In the UK, officials are seeking to detect exploitation prior to sentencing — as a counter to the high number of foreign women in jails, frequently having been victims of trafficking. One in seven women prisoners across England and Wales are foreign, with the primary offenses being drug or immigration-related. A report into the issue recommends sentencing decisions should consider the role of women, and of coercion, in such cases.

Artists also have a special role to play in the education and awareness of the public. The first opera about sex trafficking will premiere in Liverpool, England, on March 7. Anya17 was composed by Adam Gorb with a libretto written by Ben Kaye. Performers will come from Manchester's Royal Northern College of Music and the Royal Liverpool Philharmonic contemporary music ensemble 10/10. Funding for the production was provided in part by the United Nations.


text:
User talk:Hcorke

-- 05:04, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hcorke


text:
User talk:Rkreddy333

-- 05:11, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rkreddy333


text:
User talk:Mliu.tw

-- 05:14, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mliu.tw


text:
User talk:Kapilniljekar27

-- 05:18, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kapilniljekar27


text:
User talk:Bundit kratoknok

-- 05:19, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bundit kratoknok


text:
User talk:Nick1666

-- 05:22, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nick1666


text:
User talk:Emiemily

-- 05:23, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Emiemily


text:
User talk:Fostbook

-- 05:26, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Fostbook


text:
User talk:KissKid78

-- 05:32, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:KissKid78


text:
User talk:Leespectacular

-- 05:34, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Leespectacular


text:
User talk:Man

-- 05:36, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Man


text:
User talk:Suryabhagavan

-- 05:42, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Suryabhagavan


text:
User talk:AnonymousAnimus

-- 05:43, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:AnonymousAnimus


text:
User talk:Canadian.kool.kid

-- 05:51, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Canadian.kool.kid


text:
User talk:Yarri swamy

-- 05:52, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Yarri swamy


text:
User talk:مميز بدون نيم

-- 05:55, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:مميز بدون نيم


text:
User talk:Bruno011

-- 06:02, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bruno011


text:
User talk:Agiro

-- 06:11, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Agiro


text:
User talk:M.riyadi

-- 06:17, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:M.riyadi


text:
User talk:Kharismack

-- 06:18, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kharismack


text:
User talk:Alok S Sharma

-- 06:24, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Alok S Sharma


text:
User talk:WilhelmusI

-- 06:25, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:WilhelmusI


text:
User talk:Jphollanti

-- 06:28, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jphollanti


text:
User talk:Cadum

-- 06:32, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Cadum


text:
User talk:Loveanne

-- 06:32, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Loveanne


text:
User talk:Divinemes

-- 06:34, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Divinemes


text:
User talk:Mtl6675

-- 06:34, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mtl6675


text:
User talk:Syourinjikenpou

-- 06:39, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Syourinjikenpou


text:
User talk:Tellum123

-- 06:45, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tellum123


text:
User talk:Sujathapugaz

-- 06:46, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sujathapugaz


text:
User talk:Suhail sail rajpar

-- 06:48, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Suhail sail rajpar


text:
User talk:Ebadi85

-- 06:50, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ebadi85


text:
User talk:Tandyr.rozin

-- 06:54, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tandyr.rozin


text:
User talk:Suriyaeee

-- 06:55, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Suriyaeee


text:
User talk:Tirupati00

-- 06:55, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tirupati00


text:
User talk:Manojmeek

-- 06:56, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Manojmeek


text:
User talk:Mohd.otb

-- 06:59, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mohd.otb


text:
User talk:Rasty Arbet

-- 07:00, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rasty Arbet


text:
User talk:Jk spkos

-- 07:03, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jk spkos


text:
User talk:Mconn89

-- 07:08, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mconn89


text:
User talk:Choku.sy

-- 07:18, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Choku.sy


text:
User talk:Zaeyulwan

-- 07:19, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Zaeyulwan


text:
User talk:Sinu.surya

-- 07:30, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sinu.surya


text:
User talk:Revanth104

-- 07:30, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Revanth104


text:
User talk:Ashwinkumark10

-- 07:32, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ashwinkumark10


text:
User talk:Ajaytagad

-- 07:34, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ajaytagad


text:
User talk:S890823

-- 07:35, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:S890823


text:
User talk:Frenzl20

-- 07:40, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Frenzl20


text:
User talk:Zhangyouruo

-- 07:45, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Zhangyouruo


text:
User talk:Brennankeller

-- 07:46, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Brennankeller


text:
User talk:Isyanqar28

-- 07:47, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Isyanqar28


text:
User talk:KiriLL Uglev

-- 07:51, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:KiriLL Uglev


text:
User talk:JKChandler

-- 07:53, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:JKChandler


text:
User talk:S1lver ex

-- 07:54, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:S1lver ex


text:
User talk:Rajaseeni

-- 07:54, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rajaseeni


text:
User talk:Brackenheim

-- 07:56, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Brackenheim


text:
User talk:Pajuheshboy

-- 07:58, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Pajuheshboy


text:
User talk:Bukem203

-- 08:00, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bukem203


text:
User talk:Giorfarm54

-- 08:02, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Giorfarm54


text:
User talk:Percht

-- 08:10, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Percht


text:
User talk:Ace1810

-- 08:13, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ace1810


text:
User talk:Ilegas

-- 08:13, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ilegas


text:
User talk:Litswa

-- 08:13, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Litswa


text:
User talk:Zibraan

-- 08:14, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Zibraan


text:
User talk:Hkrier

-- 08:14, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hkrier


text:
User talk:Oinlasi

-- 08:17, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Oinlasi


text:
User talk:Kuto chak khoe

-- 08:22, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kuto chak khoe


text:
User talk:Thisandthat123

-- 08:25, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Thisandthat123


text:
User talk:Sepp

-- 08:28, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sepp


text:
User talk:Traitimcuagio27094

-- 08:31, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Traitimcuagio27094


text:
User talk:Fidan-20

-- 08:32, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Fidan-20


text:
User talk:Uppermurray

-- 08:36, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Uppermurray


text:
User talk:Karlybree

-- 08:39, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Karlybree


text:
User talk:追寻信仰

-- 08:40, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:追寻信仰


text:
User talk:Ariste2

-- 08:41, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ariste2


text:
User talk:BoeingFE

-- 08:43, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:BoeingFE


text:
User talk:Jokipakka

-- 08:45, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jokipakka


text:
User talk:Sayeed011

-- 08:45, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sayeed011


text:
User talk:Jacque fresco

-- 08:47, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jacque fresco


text:
User talk:Charlosc

-- 08:47, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Charlosc


text:
User talk:Babbelonline

-- 08:47, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Babbelonline