text:
Queensland cab conversations to be recorded

May 8, 2011

State officials in Queensland, Australia, have begun working on a draft protocol to use security cameras to record conversations in s. The new draft proposes to change a current policy which allows for cameras in taxis which do not record sound for privacy reasons, in the hope that audio recordings will make some investigations easier.

The paper, which says audio recordings would "provide greater certainty with regard to investigations, particularly in situation of conflicting statements," is currently at the Transport and Main Roads department. The proposal also suggests extending the time taxi companies can keep recordings downloaded from security cameras from the current 30–35 days.

The chairman of one taxi company said the proposed measure would increase the safety of his drivers. "In 2006 the government introduced the security cameras and most cabs now have units," he said. "What we've got now is an improvement over having nothing at all and as a result there has been a fair improvement in the reduction of assaults on taxi drivers."

, a union of taxi operators, said they supported the introduction of audio recording because it would create "greater transparency and certainty in investigations where there were conflicting statements from drivers and passengers."

To address privacy concerns, the paper proposes to add stickers to the entry points at the taxis. The text will read, "Security cameras and microphones fitted. You will be photographed. Conversations will be recorded". However, the legislation draft has met opposition from some. , a spokesperson for the, objected to the measure on privacy grounds. "We need to know how these recordings are going to be used," he said. "Who's going to have access to them?"

, the president of the said he opposed the measure because the recordings might be used by taxi companies in civil cases concerning driver complaints. "We're swapping from saying it's about safety to saying it's about setting fare disputes," he said. "We don't think that justifies collecting ... intensely personal information that audio recordings collect."

Queensland's privacy commissioner Linda Matthews reacted said the recordings would be used for genuine law enforcement purposes. , Queensland's Transport Minister, said the ideas within the proposal would be heavily considered before being implemented. She said: "If people think it's a good idea then we go to full consultation. I would be meeting with the privacy commissioner, I'd be meeting with the taxi industry, I'd be consulting with members of the public in a much more formal way."


text:
User talk:Seizei

-- 04:51, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: User talk:Seizei


text:
User talk:Jassi Supahia

-- 04:51, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jassi Supahia


text:
User talk:Sabari238

-- 04:54, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sabari238


text:
User talk:Adgjmn2

-- 05:06, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Adgjmn2


text:
User talk:Cellarfloor

-- 05:15, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Cellarfloor


text:
User talk:Hqyyao

-- 05:32, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hqyyao


text:
User talk:Palash dutta

-- 05:50, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Our submission guidelines
I'd like to let you know that here at the English Wikinews, we only accept English language news. You've recently made contributions that don't qualify as news. We appreciate your contributions, but we cannot accept the edits you've made, so they have been reverted or deleted.

In the future, if you'd like to submit news, we are more than happy to have your help! Just make sure to check out this article, which talks about what Wikinews is not. As a brief primer, please note that neither editorial content nor opinion pieces qualify as news.

Thank you for your contributions! — Mike moral  ♪♫  06:03, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Palash dutta


text:
User talk:BageDevimo

-- 06:02, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:BageDevimo


text:
User talk:Nikhil v paulson

-- 06:04, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nikhil v paulson


text:
User talk:Embla~enwikinews

-- 06:15, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Article submission
Hi!

You seem to have written an article on your user page. For it to be considered for publication, you would have to create it in a page of its own. Please refer to some of the information in the above welcome template for help with this. --Brian McNeil / talk 10:14, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I've moved your article to Youth charged over egg-throwing at Bieber concert in Australia. I'll make a few changes to bring it closer to the Wikinews Style Guide. --Brian McNeil / talk 16:42, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

The Japanese workers article
I noticed an article you started, looks interesting, but its latest source was a few days old! The event already happened, I think you may want to add more details about the latest findings basing on a few newer sources like the one I added. Gryllida 07:28, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Embla. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Embla~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:15, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:31, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Embla~enwikinews


text:
User talk:Ghostrider8000

-- 06:17, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ghostrider8000


text: User:Clrstockbridge

title: User:Clrstockbridge


text:
User talk:Banan14kab

-- 06:39, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Banan14kab


text:
Thread:Comments:World leaders react to death of Osama bin Laden/One sided.

What about all the negative reaction to Bin Laden's death, like leader of Hamas, Ismail Haniyeh, condemning the killing as "the killing of an Arab holy warrior," and an official of the radical Palestinian Islamist party, Hizb ut-Tahrir, calling Osama bin Laden a "lion" and denouncing President Obama as a "dog" who "deserves to be hanged”?


text:
Thread:Comments:Osama bin Laden dead, report U.S. officials/This entire story doen't pass the "smell test"!/reply (12)

There has always been people to create rumors and to suspect people with more authority to try to screw the people. As this may have been true in the past, it is less and less applicable in today's world.


text:
Thread:Comments:Osama bin Laden killed in U.S. operation in Pakistan, White House says/Support the death penalty?/reply (2)

It still is a death penality.

To go back on the question asked by Mattisse, I know that Saudi Arabia did not want to host OBL nor in prison, neither in a cemetery.

If were captured alive, he would have been the sacred cow. You would have had to place him in a very particular environment. Not only would that place have to be extremely secure, but you would have to find the right people to gard him. In the world, people either profoundly hated him or profoundly loved him: there aren't many shades of gray in his case.

If he would have been guarded by haters, they would have killed him or torture him (and by the same occasion, rendering him an even bigger martyr). On the contrary, with loving guards, if would have been liberated immediately. Plus, I'm pretty sure there are enough lovers of him out there ready to kamikaze themselves in order for him to escape.

Finally, I'll remind that a chance to surrender was given and, while starting to shoot, he supposedly said he preferred dying. It isn't the first time he refused surrendering. In fact, in a video dating back to 2003, he mentioned he would never allow himself to be captured alive.


text:
User talk:Hthoai713

-- 07:59, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hthoai713


text:
User talk:Wangying001

These outlets http://www.westwoodjewellerystore.com/genuine-vivienne-westwood.html  provide affordable fashionable ed hardy Hardy, affordable Abercrombie and Wholesale Abercrombie and very much extra to cater your style desires inside the http://www.westwoodjewellerystore.com/vivienne-westwood-charms.html   limited budget. very much of those http://www.westwoodjewellerystore.com/vivienne-westwood-rings.html  outlets also have their on the internet sites in which you create a purchase without owning even wasting your time and money. You can browse http://www.westwoodjewellerystore.com/vivienne-westwood-earrings.html  through their on  http://www.westwoodjewellerystore.com/vivienne-westwood-brooches.html  the internet catalogues and purchase

title: User talk:Wangying001


text:
Thread:Comments:Osama bin Laden killed in U.S. operation in Pakistan, White House says/Support the death penalty?/reply (3)

Justice is done in a court of law by lawyers, judges and juries; not by Navy SEALS.

There aren't as yet enough facts to label this an assassination. Even if bin Laden was unarmed, you can't expect the soldiers there to have known that. And that's not taking into account the other people who were in the house with bin Laden.

To call this justice is absurd and offensive, in my opinion.


text:
Thread:Comments:Osama bin Laden killed in U.S. operation in Pakistan, White House says/Coincidence?/reply

I lol'd


text:
Thread:Comments:Osama bin Laden killed in U.S. operation in Pakistan, White House says/Comments from feedback form - "I'm probably a minority here, ..."/reply (6)

Fake quote is fake.


text:
User talk:Nhoftmarch

-- 08:13, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nhoftmarch


text:
User talk:Wangying002

-- 08:13, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Block
— μchip08 09:09, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Wangying002


text:
User talk:Wangying003

-- 08:15, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Block
— μchip08 09:09, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Wangying003


text:
Thread:Comments:Osama bin Laden dead, report US officials/Good press for Obama/reply (19)

What a remarkably narrow minded view. Our government can do more than one thing at a time, I hardly think Iraq was too big a distraction. Just grow up and admit that Bush wasn't as stupid or incompetent as your hippy parents told you he was.


text:
User talk:Wangying004

-- 08:16, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Block
— μchip08 09:10, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Wangying004


text:
Thread:Comments:Osama bin Laden killed in U.S. operation in Pakistan, White House says/Bad idea to kill him/reply (2)

The above comment is why people hate Americans.


text:
User talk:Springyboy

-- 08:22, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Springyboy


text:
Thread:Comments:Osama bin Laden killed in U.S. operation in Pakistan, White House says/Defeatist/reply (2)

I don't see a restored Muslim caliphate on the horizon, which is really what he wanted. And in the end, impious, atheistic/Christian Westerners are pretty much pwning the Middle East. I can't help but think that Osama must have been a little disappointed.


text:
User talk:Gusathya

-- 08:32, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gusathya


text:
User talk:Musicmahii

-- 08:45, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Musicmahii


text:
User talk:Augustin.ragon

-- 08:50, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Augustin.ragon


text:
User talk:Thangtran

-- 09:02, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Our submission guidelines
I'd like to let you know that here at the English Wikinews, we only accept English language news. You've recently made contributions that don't qualify as news. We appreciate your contributions, but we cannot accept the edits you've made, so they have been reverted or deleted.

In the future, if you'd like to submit news, we are more than happy to have your help! Just make sure to check out this article, which talks about what Wikinews is not. As a brief primer, please note that neither editorial content nor opinion pieces qualify as news.

Thank you for your contributions! DEN DODGE  11:04, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Thangtran


text:
Thread:Comments:Osama bin Laden killed in U.S. operation in Pakistan, White House says/Comments from feedback form - "I'm probably a minority here, ..."/reply (7)

Oh right... http://the20.nbcnewyork.com/post/5158721867/i-mourn-the-loss-of-thousands-of-precious-lives


text:
User talk:Tele-thau

-- 09:07, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tele-thau


title: User:Wangying001


title: User:Wangying002


title: User:Wangying003


title: User:Wangying004


text:
Category:Sockpuppets of Wangying001

This category contains Sockpuppets of Wangying001, and includes both confirmed and suspected sockpuppets.

To add a user to this category, please use sockpuppet.

title: Category:Sockpuppets of Wangying001


text:
User talk:Le Français

-- 09:24, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Le Français


text:
User talk:Dgarte

-- 09:42, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dgarte


text:
User talk:Clinnovo

-- 10:01, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Clinnovo


text:
User talk:Rohit Naniwadekar

-- 10:03, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rohit Naniwadekar


text:
User talk:Ritika Chaudhary

-- 10:05, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ritika Chaudhary


text:
User talk:P.crouch

-- 10:07, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:P.crouch


text:
User talk:Hirotoshi09

-- 10:12, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hirotoshi09


text:
User talk:Nh4thoang

-- 10:23, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nh4thoang


text:
User talk:Abungirom

-- 10:47, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Abungirom


text:
User talk:Aravindprabhu

-- 10:58, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Aravindprabhu


text:
User talk:Maheshken

-- 11:08, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Maheshken


text:
User talk:Ebhars

-- 11:17, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ebhars


text:
User talk:Dpinpin

-- 11:19, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dpinpin


text:
User talk:Sponge20

-- 11:23, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sponge20


text:
User talk:Petra-b07

-- 11:24, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Petra-b07


text:
User talk:Misburg

-- 11:42, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Misburg


text:
User talk:Millesi

-- 11:44, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Millesi


text:
User talk:Croonstad

-- 11:48, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Croonstad


text:
User talk:DutchTiger

-- 11:51, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:DutchTiger


text:
User talk:472Colin

-- 11:59, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:472Colin


text:
User talk:TishonHeart

-- 12:13, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:TishonHeart


text:
User talk:Licheng668899

-- 12:13, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Licheng668899


text:
User talk:Wisg

-- 12:20, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Wisg


text:
User talk:Raulgarcia10

-- 12:22, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Raulgarcia10


text:
User talk:Biodun~enwikinews

-- 12:26, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Biodun. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Biodun~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:12, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:29, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Biodun~enwikinews


text:
User talk:さえぼー

-- 12:27, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:さえぼー


text:
User talk:Eagle1954

-- 12:29, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Eagle1954


text:
User talk:NinjaGerbil

-- 12:50, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:NinjaGerbil


text:
User talk:Vimaldatt

-- 12:51, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Vimaldatt


text:
User talk:Matthew9999

-- 12:59, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Matthew9999


text:
User talk:Guzikov96

-- 13:05, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Guzikov96


text:
User talk:Gleb Toropchin

-- 13:12, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gleb Toropchin


text:
User talk:Faith~enwikinews

-- 13:23, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Faith. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Faith~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:16, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:31, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Faith~enwikinews


text:
User talk:Roninbudo

-- 13:52, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Roninbudo


text:
User talk:Aliabt

-- 13:59, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Aliabt


text:
User talk:Barzellettiere

-- 14:13, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Barzellettiere


text:
User talk:Tarasarat

-- 14:17, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tarasarat


text:
User talk:Fuad setiadi

-- 14:20, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Fuad setiadi


text:
User talk:Maqhaq1

-- 14:24, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Maqhaq1


text:
User talk:Blocker1234

-- 14:25, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Blocker1234


text:
User talk:Tanh159

-- 14:28, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tanh159


text:
User talk:Mallsrox

-- 14:35, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mallsrox


text:
User talk:Jkandorfer

-- 14:54, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jkandorfer


text:
User talk:Yoyomath

-- 14:54, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Yoyomath


text:
User talk:HenRy77

-- 14:56, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:HenRy77


text:
User talk:PHOTOGRAPHER Ciesielski

-- 14:59, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:PHOTOGRAPHER Ciesielski


text:
User talk:MusashiM

-- 15:00, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:MusashiM


text:
User talk:Daniela stojanova

-- 15:04, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Daniela stojanova


text:
User talk:Aetersyl

-- 15:07, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Aetersyl


text:
User talk:Goldentornadoes

-- 15:07, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Goldentornadoes


text:
User talk:Schubaka

-- 15:14, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Schubaka


text:
User talk:Ggullotta1926

-- 15:38, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ggullotta1926


text:
User talk:Sm796989

-- 15:40, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sm796989


text:
User talk:Kalistor

-- 15:44, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kalistor


text:
User talk:Stephen3390

-- 15:55, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Stephen3390


text:
User talk:Mahin 77

-- 16:18, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mahin 77


text:
User talk:Lutzautoalfred

-- 16:21, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lutzautoalfred


text:
User talk:Elijah223

-- 16:31, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Elijah223


text:
User talk:Leonardo coutinho

-- 16:40, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Leonardo coutinho


text:
User talk:Pretemo

-- 16:41, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Pretemo


text:
User talk:AzertyFab

-- 16:47, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:AzertyFab


text:
User talk:Lostzenfound

-- 17:07, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lostzenfound


text:
Thread:Comments:'Where is your god now?': London policemen on trial accused of beating Muslim/Peaceful Islamics

No wonder my peaceful Islamic brothers are hating the western countries...156.8.251.250 (talk) 17:10, 5 May 2011 (UTC)


text:
Al-Qaeda says bin Laden death will 'not be wasted'; Pentagon releases videos of terrorist leader in compound

May 7, 2011 Al-Qaeda has said it will continue to launch more terrorist attacks on the U.S. and warned the death of their leader Osama bin Laden, would "not be wasted". The statement from the organization, posted on internet forums, came as the  released videos filmed inside the terrorist leader's compound which was raided last weekend. Intelligence officials said at a briefing in Washington, D.C. that the videos showed that bin Laden was still playing an active role in al-Qaeda plotting.

Although the video tapes have no audio, they show bin Laden watching news coverage of himself on television and preparing to record a propaganda film. The tapes are the latest intelligence to emerge from computer equipment seized from bin Laden's compound during the raid on his compound in, Pakistan by last weekend. Earlier this week it emerged bin Laden had been planning an attack on the American rail network on the tenth anniversary of the September 11 attacks this year. U.S. officials yesterday stressed that the al-Qaeda plot was only "aspirational", but involved derailing multiple trains by damaging rail lines at various sites.

Tonight one intelligence official said the information gleaned from the computers was the "single largest collection of senior terrorist materials ever." The computer equipment also revealed that there were hopes of attacking major transportation hubs, and that during the six years he lived at the compound in Pakistan, bin Laden stayed in close contact with senior affiliates and played an active role in developing terrorist plots. An unnamed U.S. official told The New York Times that bin Laden "wasn't just a figurehead," but "continued to plot and plan, to come up with ideas about targets and to communicate those ideas to other senior al-Qaeda leaders."

Confirming the death of bin Laden in a statement this week, al-Qaeda said his killing would be a "curse" on the U.S. and its allies. "Their happiness will turn into sorrow, and their blood will be mixed with their tears. We call upon our Muslim people in Pakistan, on whose land Sheikh Osama was killed, to rise up and revolt." The revelation that al-Qaeda was planning more attacks against the U.S. comes only several days after officials warned the terrorist group was likely to be plotting a revenge attack to avenge the death of bin Laden.

'We will never forget'
Four days after the raid on the compound, U.S. president Barack Obama visited in New York on Thursday to pay tribute to the 3,000 people killed in the September 11 attacks, for which al-Qaeda was found responsible. Bin Laden is believed to have masterminded the attacks on the and the. "When we say we will never forget, we mean what we say," Obama told firefighters in the city. He laid a made from red, white and blue flowers after meeting with relatives of the victims of the attacks. "We are going to make sure that the perpetrators of that horrible act will see justice," he said. After the wreath was laid, he stood with his head bowed for a.

The news of bin Laden's death after a team of descended into the compound was greeted with celebrations across the U.S. on Sunday night, but concerns have been raised as to whether the killing was lawful after the terrorist leader's daughter told Pakistani authorities that he had been captured and then killed. But Attorney General contradicted the statement, saying: "If he had surrendered, attempted to surrender, I think we should obviously have accepted that, but there was no indication that he wanted to do that and therefore his killing was appropriate."

Obama's visit came a day after he announced he would not be releasing images of bin Laden's body. In an interview to be aired on CBS News, the president said: "It is important for us to make sure that very graphic photos of somebody who was shot in the head are not floating around as an incitement to additional violence, as a propaganda tool." The images—described as "very gruesome"—are reported to show bin Laden shot above the left eye, with parts of his brain exposed.

Growing rift in relations
As Obama travelled to New York, the growing rift between the relations of the U.S. and Pakistan was continuing to grow after officials in Islamabad said the U.S. president may have breached U.N. rules by ordering the raid, because Pakistan was not told in advance. Senior officials within the also ordered the number of American military personnel in the country to be cut to "minimum essential" levels. , the Pakistani foreign secretary, strained relations further at a press conference when he said there were serious concerns that the U.S. had breached U.N. resolutions on, and said Pakistan is determined to "uphold our sovereignty and safeguard our security". Pakistani army officials risked tautening relations between the two countries again on Thursday as they announced they would consider cutting ties with Washington, D.C. if the U.S. mounted another unannounced raid on their soil, and said they would be expelling U.S. military personnel in retaliation.

The conflict stems from the raid during the weekend on the Abbottabad compound. Pakistan says it was not informed about the raid, which involved U.S. helicopters flying into Pakistani airspace to drop commandos who raided the house. The rift has grown further after U.S. officials questioned how Pakistani intelligence allowed bin Laden to live in the compound, a short distance from a military training academy, and suggested the terrorist leader may have been harbored by the government. The director of the CIA said earlier this week that Pakistan was not informed about the raid because of fears he was being harbored by Pakistani officials who might warn him about the raid. The president of Pakistan, Asif Ali Zardari, dismissed "baseless speculation" that his administration was sheltering bin Laden.

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton insisted tension between Washington and Pakistan over the raid had been exaggerated, and said she was keen to keep relations with Islamabad. "It is not always an easy relationship. You know that," she said. "But, on the other hand, it is a productive one for both our countries and we are going to continue to cooperate between our governments, our militaries, our law-enforcement agencies, but most importantly between the American and Pakistani people."


text:
User talk:Badarsaifbadar

-- 17:51, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Badarsaifbadar


text:
User talk:Dattatreya.suhas

-- 17:55, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dattatreya.suhas


text:
User talk:Khalismatic

-- 17:56, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Khalismatic


text:
User talk:Mocano40

-- 18:01, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mocano40


text:
User talk:HannaFreed

-- 18:09, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:HannaFreed


text:
User talk:İsoaslan

-- 18:20, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:İsoaslan


text:
Talk:Obama decides against the release of graphic photos of bin Laden

AK 74
Behind bin Ladin is not a "AK 74" It is a "AK 47"


text:
User talk:Wx2vgm

-- 18:36, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Wx2vgm


text:
User talk:Fan-d-e-gaga

-- 18:49, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Fan-d-e-gaga


text:
User talk:Adam Kelly

-- 18:52, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Adam Kelly


text:
User:Adam Kelly

Voters across the UK are voting in a series of elections throughout the country including the referendum on AV.

title: User:Adam Kelly


text:
Thread:Comments:'Where is your god now?': London policemen on trial accused of beating Muslim/What are we fighting over?

In my own opinion, the identity/purpose/nature/intention of "god" is so far removed from our human understanding that to argue about "who, what, when, where, why, gender, number (one, two, several, many) is an exercise in extreme futility. God is like the elephant in the story of the five blind men trying to identify it. Each spoke the truth, each was right, and none of them knew what an elephant actually was. And yet we fight over it, as if our very souls depend on proving information that WE DO NOT HAVE, and probably never will have. The concept of faith is to believe what we can never know. And if we can never know it, how can we fight over it? Maybe "accepting God" means accepting the fact that other beliefs may be right too.


text:
UK holds referendum on voting system

May 6, 2011

The United Kingdom electorate took to the polls yesterday to vote in both local elections and a UK-wide referendum regarding the system used to elect its members of parliament to the. The polls opened at 07:00 (0600 ) yesterday morning and closed at 22:00 BST (2100 UTC) last night.

Alongside the normal local elections for seats on 279 councils, and elections for seats in the devolved and the  and  Assemblies, the country saw the first nation-wide referendum since 1975, regarding potentially replacing the current  voting system with the  (AV) system currently used for general elections in Australia, Fiji, and Papua New Guinea, as well as for some mayoral and party leadership elections worldwide, including in the UK.

Mayoral elections also took place in, , , , and. Some areas also experienced elections to parish councils, while the constituency of underwent a by-election after its Labour MP Sir  stood down to run for mayor.

One polling station in was delivered the wrong ballot papers, causing around 90 people to cast invalid votes. Those affected were, where possible, contacted and asked to cast their vote again, according to the local council. Another, in, was closed for two hours after escaped dogs bit four people nearby.

The AV referendum came about as a result of the coalition agreement between the, who support voting reform and promised a referendum in their campaign, and the , who initially opposed reform but agreed to a referendum as a compromise, following the election in May last year.

The (SNP) hopes to retain control of the Scottish Parliament in, where it currently runs the minority government, in the hopes of potentially holding a referendum regarding Scottish independence, which they did not deliver in their first term in power; meanwhile  hope to end their coalition with  by taking control of the Welsh Assembly; however, sources from within the party report that it is likely that Labour will fail to reach a majority. Little is expected to change in Ireland, where the and  are expected to retain their dominance over the Northern Irish Assembly. Polls taken prior to the election implied that AV would be rejected by some margin, but due to low turnout — despite good weather — the results are likely to be unpredictable. The results of the AV referendum are not due to be declared until 20:00 BST (1900 UTC) today, and counting is not due to begin until 16:00 BST (1500 UTC).

As usual, was the first council to report, and was held by Labour; as is the case with many councils in the north of England, it is considered a Labour safe seat. Early predictions indicate that a number of Liberal Democrat councilors in northern cities will lose their seats to Labour or Conservative candidates. Former Labour  reportedly said that  the national opinion had changed from "Clegg mania" into "Clegg pneumonia". In an interview with the BBC, Liberal Democrat leader Nick Clegg put predicted Liberal Democrat losses down to voters being "angry" at the coalition government, but also said that the electorate is "not stupid", and would vote in council elections based on local—rather than national—factors.

The first Scottish Parliament constituency to report was, which is held by the incumbent Labour MP,. Despite being considered Labour's fourth safest Scottish seat, it experienced a swing of more than seven percent towards the SNP, and large Labour losses are predicted across Scotland. Nearby was the second to report, and was gained by SNP candidate  from the Labour incumbent.

title: UK holds referendum on voting system


text:
User talk:Jturley05

-- 19:40, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jturley05


text:
User talk:Herecomesaspecialboy

-- 20:15, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Herecomesaspecialboy


text:
User talk:Cjf2011

-- 20:20, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Cjf2011


text:
User talk:GlamourChick14

-- 20:41, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:GlamourChick14


text:
User talk:Dj59h130

-- 20:42, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dj59h130


text:
Talk:UK holds referendum on voting system

Note
If this gets reviewed before polls close, there will eb a line about results being expected around 23:30. I didn't bother to cite the article that came from, since the text will disappear soon and it's only background information anyway. For reference, it is from this BBC article, which is prominently linked from the bottom of the cited one. DEN DODGE  20:49, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Broadcast notes
I am currently watching the BBC One programme of the election results, as it is the quickest way to get reports - and analysis - of the election results. The programme is available on the BBC News Online website, as well as on BBC One and BBC News, and will probably be my primary source from this point forward. DEN DODGE  23:18, 5 May 2011 (UTC)


text:
User talk:NeluJiti

-- 20:51, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:NeluJiti


text:
User talk:LasseStorgaard

-- 20:54, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:LasseStorgaard


text:
User:Trijnstel

__NOINDEX__

 * My user page on Meta is here.

title: User:Trijnstel


text:
User talk:Prituko

-- 21:00, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Prituko


text: Comments:UK holds referendum on voting system


text:
User talk:Azflores

-- 21:07, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Azflores


text:
User talk:Tarsius

-- 21:09, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tarsius


text:
User talk:Djihinne

-- 21:09, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Djihinne


text:
User talk:Sergei Debrovski

-- 21:09, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sergei Debrovski


text:
User talk:Rzbens

-- 21:14, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rzbens


text:
User talk:Harounechawi

-- 21:23, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Harounechawi


text:
User talk:Mikebrown77

-- 21:25, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mikebrown77


text:
User talk:Chatennoir

-- 21:44, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Chatennoir


text:
User talk:PCmanic

-- 22:42, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:PCmanic


text:
User talk:Ray8210

-- 22:50, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Copyright violation
Your article - "Bin Laden raid uncovers possible terror plot on 9/11 anniversary" - was a copy and paste from another website. Unfortunately, Wikinews can't accept that - everything you submit to our site has to be your own work, and therefore that article has been or will be deleted. You may wish to consider working on the story and resubmitting it when it is your original work. Please don't let this put you off the site, and continue contributing! — Mike moral  ♪♫  23:24, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ray8210


text:
User talk:Nicnico21

-- 22:54, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nicnico21


text:
User talk:Puneetgoyal08

-- 23:22, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Puneetgoyal08


text:
Portal talk:Vatican/WikiPedia

Fixing The Name
I was just correcting the Portal Name.--Clarkcj12 (talk) 23:37, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: Portal talk:Vatican/WikiPedia


text:
User talk:Robertbayer

-- 23:38, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Robertbayer


text:
User talk:Boombaard

-- 00:06, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Boombaard


text:
User talk:Ghita-ann

-- 00:15, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ghita-ann


text:
Thread:Comments:'Where is your god now?': London policemen on trial accused of beating Muslim/Comments from feedback form - "Foul behavior from the guardia..."

Foul behavior from the guardians of peace and order. . . What ever happened to due process, and innocent until proven guilty? Brutality is NEVER RIGHT!!


text:
User talk:MilfordBoy991

-- 00:50, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:MilfordBoy991


text:
User talk:Andreclezar

-- 01:05, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Andreclezar


text:
User talk:CHINO0097

-- 01:06, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:CHINO0097


text:
User talk:Csce430teamh

-- 01:07, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Csce430teamh


text:
User talk:Monnoman

-- 01:09, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Monnoman


text:
Thread:Comments:Pakistani Taliban threaten revenge attack after bin Laden death; CIA says retaliation is likely/Comments from feedback form - "Heres a good question, why in ..."

Heres a good question, why the hell is the United States an ally to Pakistan? They are supporters of who we hate, they practically took our money that we gave them to make nuclear weapons. They must be out to kill the United States.


text:
User talk:Wguayana

-- 01:48, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Wguayana


text:
User talk:I like wenus

MY MOM

title: User talk:I like wenus


text: User:I like wenus

title: User:I like wenus


text:
Thread:Comments:'Where is your god now?': London policemen on trial accused of beating Muslim/Comments from feedback form - "Foul behavior from the guardia..."/reply

He was proven to be a Muslim. I don't see what else proof is needed.


text:
Thread:Comments:'Where is your god now?': London policemen on trial accused of beating Muslim/What are we fighting over?/reply

Group hug!!!


text:
Thread:Comments:Osama bin Laden killed in U.S. operation in Pakistan, White House says/Comments from feedback form - "I'm probably a minority here, ..."/reply (8)

You have to laugh at anybody silly enough to read that "quote" and agree with it, let alone think it is real.


text:
User talk:Zzhj

-- 02:51, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Zzhj


text:
User talk:K!tties On Fire

HEY! Freakin unblock me NOW! I'm bored! There's seriously nothing to do at my house!
 * "Because I want to" is not a valid reason to be unblocked. Please try again, using your reason here, this time stating valid reasons to overturn your block (for example, why do you want to be unblocked? What will you change in your behaviour when you are unblocked? What does Wikinews have to gain by gaining your contributorship?). Regards, — μchip08 06:54, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:K!tties On Fire


text:
Thread:Comments:Osama bin Laden dead, report U.S. officials/This entire story doen't pass the "smell test"!/reply (13)

The newspapers are all in with Obama anyway, so I bet that wouldn't prove anything.


text:
User talk:Pandora wiki

-- 03:06, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Pandora wiki


text:
Thread:Comments:Scientists create schizophrenic brain cells/Comments from feedback form - "once its on leave it on"

once its on leave it on


text:
User talk:AldannaEnncinas

-- 03:25, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:AldannaEnncinas


text:
User talk:Wucy0612

-- 03:38, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Wucy0612


text:
Thread:Comments:UK votes on voting/Yesterday was the national IQ test...

...and we failed. Failure to adopt even a tiny nudge towards a sensible, just voting system, fed by idiotic lies, misdirection, dodgy logic and propaganda by the -backed No campaign means we aren't likely to get any meaningul electoral (or fundamental constitutional) reform for a very long time because, well, "reform is hard, let's watch TV". Sigh. Britain really needs a brain transplant. Our electorate really is dumber than a sack of hammers.


text:
User talk:Victor ladeux

-- 04:43, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Victor ladeux


text:
User talk:AndyCHS96

-- 04:45, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:AndyCHS96


text:
User talk:Keanupit

-- 05:00, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Keanupit


text:
User talk:Lcfree

-- 05:15, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lcfree


text:
User talk:Drifter72

-- 06:02, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Drifter72


text:
User talk:Fzw34470575

-- 06:11, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Fzw34470575


text:
User talk:Videofan355

-- 06:18, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Videofan355


text: User:K!tties On Fire

title: User:K!tties On Fire


text:
User talk:RiyaKeralore

-- 06:31, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:RiyaKeralore


text:
User talk:Giapnambg

-- 06:39, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Giapnambg


text:
User talk:Kri5001

-- 06:48, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Modern World Hub
Hi! Thanks for your interest in Wikinews! Note, though, we do not publish editorials. Only neutrally written articles about news events. There are instructions for writing a first article here on the welcome template, above on this talk page. --Pi zero (talk) 12:52, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kri5001


text:
User talk:Abuev Ramazan

-- 07:00, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Abuev Ramazan


text:
User talk:Vamsi.kurama

-- 07:10, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Vamsi.kurama


text:
User talk:Hollyckuhno

-- 07:27, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hollyckuhno


text:
Thread:Comments:Osama bin Laden dead, report U.S. officials/This entire story doen't pass the "smell test"!/reply (14)

Free Assange to leak dat shiit


text:
User talk:Yasaswyg

-- 08:24, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Yasaswyg


text:
User talk:Flo1101

-- 08:26, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Flo1101


text:
User talk:Haimolang

-- 08:31, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Haimolang


text:
User talk:Wikii.2011

-- 08:48, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Wikii.2011


text:
Thread:Comments:UK votes on voting/Yesterday was the national IQ test.../reply

Don't count your chickens before they're frozen and on the shelf in Iceland, Tom. The results of the AV vote aren't even due until tonight, and I would hope we've got enough sense to turn the voting system into something usable, rather than it being the horse race it is now. First past the post only works at Aintree and the other racecourses round the world, not at Westminster.


text:
User talk:Hoangduykt7990

-- 09:01, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hoangduykt7990


text:
User talk:JACKFMITALIA

-- 09:09, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:JACKFMITALIA


text:
User talk:Sabri Al-Safi

-- 09:16, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sabri Al-Safi


text:
Thread:Comments:UK votes on voting/Yesterday was the national IQ test.../reply (2)

Sure, it'd be great if it happened, but based on the polling, I'm not at all optimistic.


text:
User talk:Micropot

-- 09:21, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Micropot


text:
User talk:Fanghao1965

-- 09:30, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Fanghao1965


text:
User talk:Kiranbg21

-- 09:31, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kiranbg21


text:
User talk:Hadi1998

-- 09:38, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hadi1998


text:
User talk:Aklas666

-- 09:40, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Aklas666


text:
User talk:Yuatato

-- 09:56, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Yuatato


text:
User talk:Yi Hongyu01

-- 09:58, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Yi Hongyu01


text:
User talk:Jovinpie

-- 10:11, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jovinpie


text:
User talk:Jclopministry

-- 10:50, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jclopministry


text:
User talk:Uri69

-- 10:53, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Uri69


text:
User talk:Jsyoon00

-- 11:13, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jsyoon00


text:
User talk:El3ctr0nika

-- 11:23, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:El3ctr0nika


text:
User talk:Yahya saadat

-- 11:57, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Yahya saadat


text:
User talk:Chinni~enwikinews

-- 12:01, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Chinni. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Chinni~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:15, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:29, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Chinni~enwikinews


text:
User talk:John Ericson

-- 12:04, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:John Ericson


text:
User talk:Q1445

-- 12:08, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Q1445


text:
User talk:Salwashah

-- 12:15, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Salwashah


text:
User talk:Newstar1

-- 12:17, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Newstar1


text:
User talk:Theflyingdutch

-- 12:21, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Theflyingdutch


text:
User talk:Smiga big

-- 12:28, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Smiga big


text:
User talk:Faisal.vod

-- 12:36, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

News articles
Hi! Thanks for your interest in Wikinews! We publish neutrally written articles about news events. There are step-by-step instructions on writing your first article on the welcome template at the top of this talk page. The article you submitted, though, was advertising/spamming external links, and that's not acceptable here. --Pi zero (talk) 13:06, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Faisal.vod


text:
User talk:Viverland

-- 12:45, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Viverland


text:
User talk:Juzama

-- 12:58, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Juzama


text:
User talk:P17649

-- 12:59, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:P17649


text:
User talk:Priya Nithya

-- 13:00, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Priya Nithya


text:
User talk:Bailo26

-- 13:07, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bailo26


text:
User talk:Iwan Putra

-- 13:11, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Iwan Putra


text:
User talk:Yasmin mien

-- 13:41, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Yasmin mien


text:
User talk:Natasha shehi

-- 13:44, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Natasha shehi


text:
Thread:Comments:UK votes on voting/Yesterday was the national IQ test.../reply (3)

Just out of curiosity, what is the main argument against the Alternative Vote system? I don't see why it would be opposed, since the 'first past the post' system allows candidates to win without a majority of the vote.


text:
User talk:Arjun rebel

-- 14:03, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Arjun rebel


text:
Thread:Comments:'Where is your god now?': London policemen on trial accused of beating Muslim/Comments from feedback form - ""Where is the justice now?""

"Where is the justice now?"


text:
User talk:Chofheins

-- 14:18, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Chofheins


text:
User talk:Char~enwikinews

-- 14:22, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Char. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Char~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:15, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:29, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Char~enwikinews


text:
User talk:Udo53

-- 14:32, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Udo53


text:
User talk:Hockie

-- 14:35, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hockie


text:
User talk:Dumanmehmet

-- 14:40, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dumanmehmet


text:
User talk:Meltoncub

-- 14:59, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Meltoncub


text:
User talk:Salkis

-- 15:05, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Salkis


text:
User talk:Stigter25

-- 15:29, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Stigter25


text:
User talk:Zigsfy

-- 15:47, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Zigsfy


text:
User talk:Yousuf sajeeb

-- 16:16, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Yousuf sajeeb


text:
User talk:Nicolò Facchini

-- 16:21, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nicolò Facchini


text:
User talk:Prabuinc

-- 16:32, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Prabuinc


text:
User talk:Kri500

-- 16:40, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kri500


text:
Thread:Comments:UK votes on voting/Yesterday was the national IQ test.../reply (4)

Here are all of the arguments I've heard against AV.

 * 1) People are stupid and unable to cope with having to order their preferences. (People may be stupid, but not that stupid, and if they are that stupid, they shouldn't be voting using any system.)
 * 2) It is "untested" (except in countries like Australia).
 * 3) Not many other countries use it (...not many other countries have an NHS, but that's not a reason to not have one. Not many other Western countries persist in having a monarchy, but I don't see the government wanting to get rid of the monarchy because other country's are republics.)
 * 4) It isn't "British" (seriously, that's an argument David Cameron used).
 * 5) It will cost lots of money which we could spend on hospitals or something (it won't).
 * 6) It will mean the Tories lose seats (which is bad if you are a Tory).
 * 7) It will mean the LibDems gain seats (which is bad if you don't like the LibDems).
 * 8) Winston Churchill didn't like it.
 * 9) It's not "real".
 * 10) It'll lead to more extremist politicians including the  (which is why they are against it).
 * 11) It'll lead to more moderate, middle-of-the-road politicians (rather contradicts the previous argument).
 * 12) Under AV, your vote gets counted twice (not true: in some situations, your lower preference votes get counted but only once your first preferences have been set aside).
 * 13) It'll lead to larger majorities in landslide elections such as the 1997, where Labour would have had a much bigger majority. (But that's because in 1997, Labour had majority support of the country!)
 * 14) It'll lead to smaller majorities and more hung parliaments and thus more coalitions. (Urgh, that's the opposite of the previous argument, right?)
 * 15) Rupert Murdoch doesn't like it.


text:
User talk:Marian keaney

-- 16:45, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Marian keaney


text:
User talk:OUANES

-- 16:51, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:OUANES


text:
Thread:Comments:UK votes on voting/Yesterday was the national IQ test.../reply (5)

Regarding 13 & 14, I can see the argument of 14 certainly. After all, look at Belgium, which uses a system like this and hasn't had a majority controlled parliament for $(insert.selected_deity) only knows how long.


text:
User talk:Salmir20

-- 16:53, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Salmir20


text:
Liberal Democrats defeated in UK elections after alternative vote and councils rejected; Salmond wins historic first majority vote

May 6, 2011

Nick Clegg, the leader of the and deputy prime minister in the United Kingdom, has today conceded a "bitter blow" after suffering two major defeats as the electorate  the  and his party was battered by its worst local election defeat in 30 years. The also won the historic first majority vote in the history of Scotland, which will pave the way for a referendum on.

The electorate overwhelmingly rejected the alternative vote; 68 percent voting "no" to 32 percent voting "yes". The rejection was the second defeat for the Liberal Democrat leader today after the party also lost seats across the country. Gary Long, leader of the Liberal Democrats on, who lost his seat to today, has publicly called for Clegg to resign after the electoral defeats. The Liberal Democrat mayor of accused Clegg of "letting the party down", and a third party leader said he should "think about his position".

Clegg, who campaigned to implement the alternative vote, was today forced to concede his party had taken a disappointing loss in failing to win the alternative vote, and sustained "big knocks" in the council elections because it was "getting the brunt of the blame" for spending cuts implemented by the coalition. While it was a good day for the —who gained two more council seats—Clegg had lost almost half his council seats, many to Labour. , the Labour leader, said the backlash against Clegg sent "a clear message" to the Liberal Democrats "that there needs to be a change of direction on some of the key issues". Many families who rejected his party, Clegg said, feared a return to. "We need to get up, dust ourselves down and move on," he said.

But tonight leading "yes" campaigners admitted they had been defeated. , a Liberal Democrat minister who campaigned in support of the alternative vote, said: "The rejection has been overwhelming and we accept that." He said the public had resoundingly rejected the alternative vote, and suggested any attempt "to find some sort of backdoor method to bring something in that is not first past the post will be seen to have snubbed the clear wishes of the electorate." Counting of the ballots, which were cast yesterday across the country, is continuing tonight, but the "no" vote has already passed the winning post. was a higher-than-expected 41 percent.

As turmoil spreads within the Liberal Democrats, there are also reports of tension between the two coalition parties—Clegg campaigned in support of the system, but his Conservative coalition partner David Cameron campaigned against it. Although senior politicians within the coalition insist there are no differences after the campaign over the alternative vote, differences are thought to be mounting within the government. , a former Liberal Democrat leader, today said the "goodwill and trust" between the coalition parties had all but dissolved.

In Scotland, the SNP won a majority vote for the first time in the history of the country after the Liberal Democrat vote collapsed and Labour suffered an unpredicted defeat, allowing the party leader, Alex Salmond, to hold a on Scottish independence. "Just as the Scottish people have restored trust in us, we must trust the people as well," he said. "Which is why, in this term of the parliament, we will bring forward a referendum and trust the people on Scotland's own constitutional future." Following a series of defeats for senior Labour politicians in Scotland the party leader,, announced his resignation. Cameron congratulated Salmond for his "emphatic win", but said he would fight Scottish independence "with every single fibre that I have."

Vote counting has begun in Northern Ireland, but the full layout of the will not be known before tomorrow evening. Meanwhile, Labour missed out on an overall majority in the by one seat; it now appears they may form an alliance with the Liberal Democrats. , the leader of the Labour party in Wales said the electorate wanted them to govern, but refused to dismiss the prospect of an alliance. "The one thing the people of Wales have said very clearly to us is they want Labour to stand up for them and they want Labour to lead the next Welsh government," he said. "Over the next few days all the parties will be considering their positions. The opposition parties have had some severe disappointments and things need to settle before they think about their position."


text:
User talk:Reddevil3000

-- 17:03, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Reddevil3000


text:
User talk:Mike prasetya

-- 17:10, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mike prasetya


text:
User talk:Mccre008

-- 17:38, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mccre008


text:
User talk:S.furkanyildiz

-- 17:38, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:S.furkanyildiz


text:
User talk:Swpb

-- 17:42, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Swpb


text:
User:FaktneviM

Registered: 09:27, 25 April 2011

--FaktneviM (talk) 13:49, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

title: User:FaktneviM


text:
User talk:555jtj

-- 17:55, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:555jtj


text:
User talk:Caesura

-- 17:59, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Caesura


text:
User talk:Bottomboosh

-- 18:03, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bottomboosh


text:
User talk:RayBarker

-- 18:11, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:RayBarker


text:
Thread:Comments:Body of Sheikh Ahmed bin Zayed Al Nahyan found in Moroccan lake/Comments from feedback form - "Sitting here in the States, it..."

Sitting here in the States, it seems good. But really, how can I know? When you ask people to rate a page, are you only asking people who might be in a position of knowing (but that would be a tiny number). Maybe make it more clear what you're looking for.


text:
Thread:Comments:Sixteen killed in Marrakech, Morocco bomb blast/Comments from feedback form - "Well, sitting here in the Stat..."

Well, sitting here in the States, I have to go on what I feel. I presume if there were any major errors in the story, Morocco would contact Wikinews.


text:
User talk:Johnnylopez2400

-- 18:34, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Johnnylopez2400


text:
User talk:Maikarro

-- 18:40, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Maikarro


text:
User talk:Buselsa,99

-- 18:40, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Buselsa,99


text:
User talk:Ranjith.esp

-- 19:24, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ranjith.esp


text:
User talk:Tipoldotre

-- 19:27, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tipoldotre


text:
User talk:Joyceisadreamer

-- 19:36, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Joyceisadreamer


text:
User talk:Nephthys13

-- 19:54, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nephthys13


text:
User:Fra4481

it:Utente:Fra4481

title: User:Fra4481


text:
User talk:Luchoangulo123

-- 20:08, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Luchoangulo123


text:
User talk:Jeje68bz

-- 20:24, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jeje68bz


text:
User talk:Cordeliafoo

-- 20:25, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Cordeliafoo


text:
Talk:Al-Qaeda says bin Laden death will 'not be wasted'; Pentagon releases videos of terrorist leader in compound

Article should not start with a lower case "a" even if it starts with "al-Quaeda". Please reword. Geofferybard (talk) 20:52, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Hey thanks to the editor who implemented my suggestion...this is a landmark, I think, for my user history...[w:American humor|w:Americanhumor]Geofferybard (talk) 21:02, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Gosh, it would be nice if we could get this published.
It seems like there is a lot of work that has been done to polish this article but unfortunately it is languishing. Maybe there can be expedited means to train and qualify reviewers? I may just be too impatient, but then the news business is largely all about being fast.Geofferybard (talk) 00:05, 7 May 2011 (UTC)


text:
User talk:ColeDavis

-- 21:03, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:ColeDavis


text:
User talk:Gornallb

-- 21:19, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gornallb


text:
User:NeilK

See mw:User:NeilK

title: User:NeilK


text: Wikinews talk:TLDR

title: Wikinews talk:TLDR


text:
User talk:سارة بن ضيف

-- 22:20, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:سارة بن ضيف


text:
User talk:Matoro04

-- 22:29, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Matoro04


text:
User talk:Beerqueen61

-- 22:37, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Beerqueen61


text:
User talk:Ivanrozman

-- 22:41, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ivanrozman


text:
User talk:Lilita22

-- 22:50, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lilita22


text:
User talk:Nosnide88

-- 23:09, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nosnide88


text:
User talk:12345mentira

-- 23:19, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:12345mentira


text:
User talk:Beeswaxcandle

-- 23:46, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Beeswaxcandle


text:
User talk:Hamad1230

-- 00:01, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hamad1230


text:
User talk:Rovovicty

-- 00:20, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rovovicty


text:
User talk:Clyburn209

-- 00:34, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Clyburn209


text:
Thread:Comments:Dingoes attack toddler on Fraser Island/Comments from feedback form - "An animal follows its natural ..."/reply (9)

i do agree the parents should ave not let a 3 year old child out off theit sight and i agree that euthanizing the dingoes was the best option they are nasty wild dogs that ave killed many of our children in the past and no doudt will attack and kill again and again  92.41.47.153.[talk[[tara needham]  02.39. 5th may 2011.


text:
User talk:DeltazettA

-- 01:48, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:DeltazettA


text:
User talk:Gabriela Gonza

-- 02:08, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gabriela Gonza


text:
User talk:Quankong609

-- 02:15, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Quankong609


text:
User talk:1lizangel

-- 02:23, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:1lizangel


text:
User talk:Alice Foz

-- 02:24, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Alice Foz


text:
User talk:Artu165

-- 02:37, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Artu165


text:
User talk:Lujunwen23

-- 02:44, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lujunwen23


text:
User talk:Saltprune416

-- 02:56, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Saltprune416


text:
User talk:Thomas11104

-- 03:22, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Thomas11104


text: Talk:Queensland cab conversations to be recorded


text:
User talk:Oktian

-- 03:51, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Oktian


text: Comments:Obama decides against the release of graphic photos of bin Laden


text:
User talk:Gustavo Lima Lopes

-- 04:08, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gustavo Lima Lopes


text:
User talk:Lhakdrup

-- 04:24, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lhakdrup


text: Talk:Liberal Democrats defeated in UK elections after alternative vote and councils rejected; Salmond wins historic first majority vote


text:
User talk:Toppayday

-- 04:32, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Toppayday


text:
User talk:Coboblack

-- 04:38, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Coboblack


text:
User talk:Gmurchison

-- 04:58, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gmurchison


text:
User talk:Rush2jj

-- 05:02, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rush2jj


text:
User talk:Slavoljub pekar

-- 05:05, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Slavoljub pekar


text:
User talk:Youuunis

-- 05:14, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Youuunis


text:
User talk:Megawasa

-- 05:36, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Megawasa


text:
User talk:Ozlin03

-- 05:41, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ozlin03


text:
User talk:Shyrecluse

-- 05:47, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Shyrecluse


text:
User:Shyrecluse

Hello --Shyrecluse (talk) 05:48, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User:Shyrecluse


text:
User talk:Omer123hussain

-- 06:20, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Omer123hussain


text:
User talk:DAVIDE BODINI

-- 06:50, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:DAVIDE BODINI


text:
User talk:20thCB

-- 06:54, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:20thCB


text:
User talk:Zarus88

-- 07:00, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Zarus88


text:
User talk:Xuejc1988

-- 07:01, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Xuejc1988


text:
User talk:Ccocoo

-- 07:05, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ccocoo


text:
User talk:Monarawila

-- 07:08, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Monarawila


text:
User talk:Jay.Here

-- 07:10, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jay.Here


text:
User talk:Barry al

-- 07:43, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Barry al


text:
User talk:THE HILL

-- 08:12, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:THE HILL


text:
User talk:Ankitstarski

-- 08:14, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ankitstarski


text:
User talk:Vrana 87

-- 08:17, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Vrana 87


text:
User talk:Solomon david

-- 08:19, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Solomon david


text:
User talk:Anirban Kalna 16

-- 08:42, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Anirban Kalna 16


text:
User talk:Olegbv

-- 09:06, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Olegbv


text:
User talk:Wilford~enwikinews

-- 09:07, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Wilford. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Wilford~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:23, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:40, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Wilford~enwikinews


text:
User talk:Nathandiesta

-- 09:12, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nathandiesta


text:
User talk:Imad.elfay

-- 09:14, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Imad.elfay


text:
User talk:Dimanastir

-- 09:17, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dimanastir


text:
User talk:Syncalin

-- 09:52, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Syncalin


text:
User talk:Westhot

-- 10:06, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Westhot


text:
User talk:Frodnord

-- 10:09, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Frodnord


text:
Comments:Liberal Democrats defeated in UK elections after alternative vote and councils rejected; Salmond wins historic first majority vote

Comments from feedback form - "it should have said whether La..."
it should have said whether Labour was for or against AV ! —58.96.54.132 (talk) 10:26, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Comments from feedback form - "You Brits are idiots for not s..."
You Brits are idiots for not supporting the alternative vote. This is essentially a vote against democracy! —166.137.141.81 (talk) 01:25, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

 * Hey, I voted yes. The real problem was who AV's prominent supporters were... Which is a little sad. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 01:35, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

What exactly were they voting for...
Doesn't seem to say that what they were voting for was wether votes for *least* favorite should be counted as importantly as votes for favorite. It's a little bit more complicated than that as first preference will usually be unaffected by least preference, except in the case of a tied vote for instance, but it was something like that.

It's a pity it failed because people in general consider their least preference to be more important than their favorite, especially in politics, and this vote says in some small way that the people do not want their true preferences aired, or, they don't know the route to having their true preferences aired even when it is staring them in the face... Or am I wrong? Is the backbone of politics and public opinion not in that which people prefer least? I think it is obviously so. All political programs and gatherings with differing sides focus on avoiding the things which we do not prefer and pointing out past or ongoing mistakes. So for all those people who have been involved in protests in the last couple of years and spend some time regulary giving out about what they do not want to see any more of, and then turned around and voted against this bill designed to cater for you, you are your own worst enemy, you cannot see the woods for the trees, you are the weakest link... RTG (talk) 14:44, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

 * But hey, maybe it's not your fault... maybe you were led into the vote wih some arguement that there was a downside to saying, "Wait I really don't like that one!" Or something. People keep slaughtering sheep and giving out about how it doesn't taste nice. Maybe it was more like that. RTG (talk) 14:46, 8 May 2011 (UTC)


text:
User talk:Megami Hikari

-- 10:42, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Megami Hikari


text:
User talk:贝雅特丽齐

-- 10:49, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:贝雅特丽齐


text:
User talk:Jonesja9

-- 11:26, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jonesja9


text:
User talk:Gaius Flavius Grecus

-- 11:31, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gaius Flavius Grecus


text:
User talk:Rehmanmd

-- 11:41, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rehmanmd


text:
User talk:Pekonngo

-- 11:44, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Pekonngo


text:
27 believed dead in Indonesian plane crash

May 7, 2011

Officials say 27 people are dead after a plane crashed into the sea off east Indonesia today. Fifteen bodies have been recovered and it is thought the others on board have sunk with the wreckage.

"I can confirm that all the passengers were killed when the plane exploded as it crashed into the sea," an official told local radio station . He said around ten navy divers were sent to the crash site 400 metres off-shore in six kilometres of water but "had difficulties locating them [trapped passengers] due to strong currents and limited equipment."

has not confirmed passenger numbers. A transport ministry spokesman said the ministry is "still checking on the passengers' situation," adding "the weather was pretty bad at the time [of the crash]." Built by the of China, the propellor-driven  was 500 metres from a runway when it crashed, according to airport officials.

The nation of islands has heavy use of aviation and a poor safety record, including the crash of an Adam Air jet in 2007 that killed 102 people near Sulawesi. The European Commission had banned all Indonesian airlines from entering it, but two years ago flag carrier Garuda Indonesia was deemed to have improved and allowed to enter.


text:
User talk:Clickpen

-- 11:46, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Clickpen


text:
User talk:Dendodge/Apr 11

Wackynews
Perhaps you should remove the category Wacynews from Celebrity bear Knut dies suddenly at the Berlin Zoo, since its addition there  was the reason I added it to Polar bear Knut's death linked to encephalitis in the first place. Thanks for being BOLD and resolving the viral issue. Regards, Mattisse (talk) 00:56, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm just not entirely sure the death of a much-loved animal is entirely "wacky"—I'll go remove it from the other article now. :-) DEN  DODGE  15:07, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Never mind, it seems Pi Zero already did it. DEN  DODGE  15:09, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Review of ACLU, EFF challenging US 'secret' court orders seeking twitter data
Thanks for your work on the review of this. want to run a pool on who objects to it getting FA status? ;-) --Brian McNeil / talk 16:27, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Main page
I agree with your decision. Sometimes the main page seems to be all about a dead body found in so-and-so accidents in which people are killed. Little international coverage about other things that don't pertain exclusively to the UK or the US. Mattisse (talk) 00:30, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Are you a reviewer?
I noticed that you just made a change to Indian activist begins "fast-unto-death" hunger strike to end corruption. The article has something like five "pending changes" since it was published. An updated section has been added with news that happened after the article was published and three April 8 sources added that are after the date of publication on April 7.

So the article is becoming progressively screwed up, as when a reader looks at the article, they see the article with the pending changes implemented. Only one pending change (a spelling correction) is valid, plus maybe yours. (Did you adjust the layout based on the published article version or the version with all the pending changes?)

Regards, Mattisse (talk) 21:03, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

 * Never mind. Pi zero to care of it. Thanks, Mattisse (talk) 21:06, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Please reconsider
See my reasoning at Talk:Microsoft to release patches for 64 security flaws on Tuesday as well as the opinion of others who support 17 instead of seventeen, so consensus is for 17. It does not seem right when all the sources for the article, and also Microsoft's notification use 17 and not seventeen. It just looks so wrong to me and doesn't mirror any of the sources. Thank you for your consideration. Mattisse (talk) 01:14, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn. The article can use either, and it's not exactly a big deal; it means exactly the same thing whatever method we use to present it. The style guide, in its current form, says to spell out numbers in the teens—if you wish to change that, I'm sure you could get consensus (although I expect most people would follow me in quoting Gone With the Wind). If people want to use "17", that's fine by me. DEN  DODGE  11:36, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Twitter logo
Can you revert to the old logo? The new one was deleted at Commons. (Or just upload the new one locally?)  — fetch · comms  01:44, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, I'd rather we used the new one, but I don't feel strongly either way. If you like, I can upload it locally (Wikipedia has a copy I could "borrow" at Twitter), and I'm sure we could claim fair use, but I'm not sure the new (unfree) logo conveys anything the old (free) one doesn't, other than the cute tweety bird. DEN  DODGE  15:26, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Eh, the old one is good enough. Ta,  — fetch · comms  03:43, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Help!
The article I wrote Bob Dylan plays first concert in Vietnam has twice been removed from the "Submitted for peer review" without being reviewed. Just now it was at the top of the line, and now it is suddenly back in "In development, undisputed" but no one has reviewed it. What's happening? Wish you would help. Thanks! Mattisse (talk) 20:31, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * P.S. Is it because it was deleted by a vandal? I have been working hard over days, keeping it updated so it wouldn't go stale. Now it seems hopeless! Mattisse (talk) 20:34, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * It's because it was vandalised. I would review it for you, but I'm very busy with various personal and academic issues ATM, and can't guarantee that I'll have enough time to finish a review, I'm afraid. DEN  DODGE  20:35, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * It's all well sourced, and I have tried to use sources that are easy to read and verify. If you look at the article history, you will see how I have continually updated the sources over several days. Please consider reviewing it! Mattisse (talk) 20:46, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅—I started reviewing it as soon as I had submitted my reply above. I went a bit faster than I would have liked, but it all checked out. The style could have been less "magaziney", but that's not really an issue—more personal preference, and hard to help with pop music articles. DEN  DODGE  20:57, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * A thousand million thanks! Mattisse (talk) 20:58, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Ugh, I did this at the same time you published it. C628 (talk) 20:59, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, given my limited time, I wasn't quite as thorough with my fact check as I am usually. I thought I had verified everything, but evidently something slipped through :S. Well spotted! DEN  DODGE  21:01, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Everything removed was sourced and there was no video used as a source. I left a note on C628's page explaining that the sources were there. I'm not sure why he thought they were not.  I was very careful about the sourcing. I replaced the quotebox as it was in the article anyway, and I am not sure if it was meant to be removed. The other part removed I will leave alone but it was sourced by . Thanks, Mattisse (talk) 21:17, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, I fear I may have done enough damage already. I'm tired tonight, and as I said, I have personal and academic issues to deal with, so I'm going to stay out of it for now. If it's not sorted by tomorrow (when I get up—probably around lunchtime), I might take another look, but I suggest you take this to the article talk page. More people will see it there! DEN  DODGE  21:22, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I replied about the sourcing at my talk. C628 (talk) 21:25, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

I very much appreciate your reviewing the article, as I am getting very discouraged. I first asked for "publish" on April 11 and because of vandal reversions and such, the article was twice moved out of the "review" queue. The Examiner.com source only provided some context for well known events: Dylan's debut performance 50 years ago plus awards he has received that are very well known. Nothing controversial and nothing not easily verified by other sources other than recent news articles within the last two to three days. Please don't feel bad for helping me out. I have written about 50 published articles in the last month and half. It is unfortunate that when an article writer tries to do more than "gunman shoots 6 in shopping center", reviewers won't review the article. So I very much thank you for doing so. It gives me a little more incentive to keep trying. Thanks, Mattisse (talk) 12:48, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, I certainly appreciate breadth of coverage. Don't be discouraged by the attitude here—it needs a bit of work, but it's worth persevering, and hopefully something will change soon. I can't really do much on Wikinews lately, due to my busy college schedule and certain personal issues. When the exam season is over in July, I might be able to help out a bit more, but I expect my education will keep me busy, on-and-off, for a good few years. I will try to get stuff reviewed if it's been in the queue for a while, though! DEN  DODGE  12:52, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Bored, by any chance?
Made me laugh, that did. ;-)  wacky wace  13:04, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah, pretty bored. Everyone else has gone inactive on my Supremacy 1914 game, there's nothing on TV, and there's not even anything to review (for a change). Playing with the block tool is more somewhat fun than studying for upcoming exams.  DEN  DODGE  13:06, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Two threads moved
...to User talk:Dendodge/Main Page. --Pi zero (talk) 16:19, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dendodge/Apr 11


text:
Australia, Malaysia closing in on refugee agreement

May 7, 2011

Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard is undergoing the final stages of an 292 million bilateral agreement with Malaysian counterpart to relocate 800 asylum seekers who arrive illegally by boat away from the Australian mainland for detention and processing. In exchange Gillard will expand Australia’s humanitarian efforts by assisting in the resettling of 4,000 persons of genuine refugee status, currently living in Malaysia, over a period of 4 years. This move by the Gillard Government stems from a meeting held by both the Australian and Malaysian leaders on March 30 at a Regional Co-Operation-themed Ministerial Conference in, Indonesia. Gillard had previously tried unsuccessfully to pitch the relocation of asylum seekers to East Timor and talks about such with Papua New Guinea are ongoing, although PNG says a previously closed centre will remain closed.

Immigration Minister noted that this agreement may be controversial but, "[a]s the Prime Minister said, nobody should doubt our resolve to break the people smugglers' business model."

Opposition leader Tony Abbott says that this agreement harkens back to the original migration policy which began in 2001 and was eventually scrapped by the Rudd  Government in 2007. This was known as the '' and aimed to relocate asylum seekers who illegally arrived in Australia by relocating and processing them in detention centres in the of Christmas Island and Nauru.

The 's website notes that while Malaysia hosts an estimated three million refugees and migrants from various countries it is not a signatory to the. This, it believes, will complicate the status determination of refugees.


text:
User talk:Nesli123

-- 12:01, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nesli123


text:
User talk:K 125

-- 12:09, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:K 125


text: Talk:Australia, Malaysia closing in on refugee agreement


text: Comments:Australia, Malaysia closing in on refugee agreement


text:
Talk:27 believed dead in Indonesian plane crash

Review of revision 1228120 [Passed]
Tsk, starting with a numeric value instead of a word. :)  — fetch · comms  15:58, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The old title was nothing to be proud of either, though. --Pi zero (talk) 16:02, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * How about "Plane crashes off Indonesian coast; 27 believed dead"?  wacky wace  16:49, 7 May 2011 (UTC)


text: Comments:27 believed dead in Indonesian plane crash


text:
User talk:Tompok76

-- 12:34, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tompok76


text:
User talk:Nikunj0211

-- 12:39, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nikunj0211


text:
User talk:Tiii84

-- 12:44, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tiii84


text:
User talk:Illya2012

-- 12:47, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Illya2012


text:
User talk:Nfoha

-- 13:06, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nfoha


text:
User talk:Siracc

-- 13:17, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Siracc


text:
User talk:Beepoppab

-- 13:22, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Beepoppab


text:
User talk:Lrouvbey9653

-- 13:29, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lrouvbey9653


text:
User talk:Cristian Opazo

-- 13:32, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Cristian Opazo


text:
User talk:Jpgo0

-- 13:36, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jpgo0


text:
User talk:Morayoj

-- 13:44, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Morayoj


text:
User talk:Caverna06

-- 13:45, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Caverna06


text:
User talk:Zd

-- 13:45, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Zd


text:
User talk:Pidiyax

-- 13:51, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Pidiyax


text:
User talk:Blueyays

-- 13:56, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Blueyays


text:
User talk:Escuraxemeneies

-- 13:56, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Escuraxemeneies


text:
User talk:Namnguyenvn

-- 13:58, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Namnguyenvn


text:
User talk:Zugr

-- 14:02, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Zugr


text:
User talk:China General Aviation

-- 14:13, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:China General Aviation


text:
User talk:Vivasanrocco

-- 14:24, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Vivasanrocco


text: Wikinews:Requests for permissions/Archive 9


text:
User talk:Vineeth Valsan

-- 14:58, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Vineeth Valsan


text:
User talk:Putz89

-- 15:13, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Putz89


text:
User talk:Nahmet786

-- 15:15, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nahmet786


text:
User talk:Badadosth

-- 15:15, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Badadosth


text:
Swedish Navy confirms investigation of border violation

May 11, 2011 The have released a picture regarding a foreign submarine discovered in the  of  in, the capital city of Sweden, situated on the western coast of the.

The submarine was seen by Hanna Harge, a 40-year-old entrepreneur who lives locally, when walking with her dog on the morning of 13 April this year. She woke up her family, brought them to the location and took pictures of the submarine, before it disappeared. She and her family immediately called the Swedish Navy, believing it to be an exercise, and told them to hide the vessel better.

The Navy, however, had no knowledge of such an exercise, and no reports from other nations regarding the submarine. Soon afterwards, the Navy's intelligence agency visited Harge, taking the pictures to technical staff. The Harge family compares them to the submarines of the former and the early Russian Federation which allegedly violated Sweden's border in the same vicinity.

In addition to the, other government agencies are also involved in the investigation such as and. According to Andersson Larsson of the technical staff, the proceedings of the investigation are classified and it is expected to be finished and sent to the within two months.


text:
User talk:Emmyray123

-- 15:25, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Emmyray123


text:
User talk:Iron Fox

-- 15:29, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Iron Fox


text:
User talk:Loreaux

-- 15:38, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Loreaux


text:
User talk:Rachelnbell13

-- 15:51, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rachelnbell13


text:
User talk:Sunny2244

-- 15:54, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sunny2244


text:
User talk:Shirochan93

-- 15:56, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Shirochan93


text: Comments:Al-Qaeda says bin Laden death will 'not be wasted'; Pentagon releases videos of terrorist leader in compound


text:
User talk:Bdobres

-- 16:03, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bdobres


text:
User talk:Grumm0

-- 16:14, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Grumm0


text:
User talk:Firmanharrypermana

-- 16:15, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Firmanharrypermana


text:
Thread:Comments:Egyptian man names daughter 'Facebook'/Comments from feedback form - "Fameli"

Fameli


text:
User talk:Janma-atsugatari

-- 16:26, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Janma-atsugatari


text:
User talk:Bharat giri1723

-- 16:31, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bharat giri1723


text:
User talk:Mraj918

-- 16:38, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mraj918


text:
User talk:Lucariomon

-- 16:42, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lucariomon


text:
User talk:Need2nomore~enwikinews

-- 16:44, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Need2nomore. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Need2nomore~enwikinews that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:19, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:35, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Need2nomore~enwikinews


text:
User talk:Vstamilan

-- 16:45, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Vstamilan


text:
User talk:Alysson-G

-- 16:50, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Alysson-G


text:
User talk:Thasos 01

-- 16:56, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Thasos 01


text:
User talk:Saqib The Hit Man S

-- 17:06, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Saqib The Hit Man S


text:
User talk:Reuben june21

-- 17:14, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Reuben june21


text:
User talk:Einstien galilei

-- 17:17, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Einstien galilei


text:
User talk:Enayetkhan

-- 17:47, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Enayetkhan


text:
User talk:Bromikey

-- 17:51, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bromikey


text:
User talk:Fc1952

-- 18:02, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Fc1952


text:
User talk:GregoryWiktor

-- 18:08, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:GregoryWiktor


text:
User talk:Emustaniemiketola

-- 18:23, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Emustaniemiketola


text:
User talk:Theking17825

-- 18:31, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Theking17825


text:
User talk:Milvvi

-- 18:57, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Milvvi


text:
User talk:Nedethe3rd

-- 19:26, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nedethe3rd


text:
User talk:Ciro612

-- 19:46, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ciro612


text:
User talk:Adhithyanr

-- 19:47, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Adhithyanr


text:
User talk:Wesac

-- 19:49, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Wesac


text:
User talk:Dharmendrakiit

-- 19:59, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dharmendrakiit


text:
User talk:Chotanagpur

-- 20:13, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Chotanagpur


text:
User talk:Dssebbastian

-- 20:16, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dssebbastian


text:
User talk:Flame007

-- 20:24, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Flame007


text:
User talk:Rusted AutoParts

-- 20:26, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rusted AutoParts


text:
User talk:Teyandee

-- 20:29, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Teyandee


text:
User talk:Fortotaxi

-- 20:34, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Fortotaxi


text:
User talk:Napolissimo

-- 20:50, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Napolissimo


text:
User talk:Drewpinsky

-- 20:51, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Drewpinsky


text:
User talk:DeputyDooey

-- 20:53, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:DeputyDooey


text:
Thread:Comments:Guatemalan president and first lady granted divorce/Comments from feedback form - "WE NEED MORE UPDATED NEWS FOR ..."

WE NEED MORE UPDATED NEWS FOR GUATEMALAN COUNTRY


text:
User talk:Pasqualefresegna

-- 21:12, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Pasqualefresegna


text:
Thread:Comments:Guatemalan president and first lady granted divorce/Comments from feedback form - "WE NEED MORE UPDATED NEWS FOR ..."/reply

Good idea! This is a wiki; anyone can submit articles for review. Following the instructions on our Howdy template, write a story about Guatemala, and submit it for review. For that level of involvement in the project, you might want to consider (though it's entirely optional, of course) creating an account.


text:
User talk:Riluwilu

-- 21:21, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Riluwilu


text:
User talk:Hector

-- 21:37, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hector


text: Thread:Comments:Guatemalan president and first lady granted divorce/Comments from feedback form - "WE NEED MORE UPDATED NEWS FOR ..."/reply (2)


text:
User talk:Nwoyecid

-- 22:00, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nwoyecid


text:
User talk:Rsk341

-- 22:10, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rsk341


text:
User talk:Dialnica

-- 22:23, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dialnica


text:
User talk:SIJ309

-- 22:25, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:SIJ309


text:
User talk:Luispumista

-- 22:45, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Luispumista


text:
User talk:Алексеев Игорь Евгеньевич

-- 22:51, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Алексеев Игорь Евгеньевич


text:
User talk:5heikh

-- 22:52, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:5heikh


text:
User talk:Brunnalaryssa

-- 23:03, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Brunnalaryssa


text:
User talk:Alts

-- 23:23, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Alts


text:
User talk:Maxiemull

-- 23:38, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Maxiemull


text:
User talk:Inquisidor343

-- 23:44, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Inquisidor343


text:
User talk:Johnydoubt

-- 23:49, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Johnydoubt


text:
User talk:Nirmal Dulal

-- 00:16, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nirmal Dulal


text:
User talk:Jarqush

-- 00:19, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jarqush


text:
User talk:Liljdjschulte

-- 00:29, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Liljdjschulte


text:
User talk:Jmwild

-- 00:43, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jmwild


text:
User talk:Juandi22

-- 00:44, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Juandi22


text:
User talk:Doc fluty

-- 00:54, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Doc fluty


text:
User talk:Ripod19

-- 01:05, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ripod19


text:
User talk:King TUMI

-- 01:15, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:King TUMI


text:
User talk:Mathias 1916

-- 01:19, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mathias 1916


text:
Thread:Comments:'Where is your god now?': London policemen on trial accused of beating Muslim/Comments from feedback form - "good"

good


text:
User talk:Mt170jp

-- 01:31, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mt170jp


text:
Thread:Comments:Study says sea levels to rise faster and higher/test

test


text:
MediaWiki:Gadget-lqtAlt.css

.lqt_start_discussion span.ui-button-text {font-size: medium;font-weight: bold; color:black} .lqt-talkpage-header { text-align: center } .lqt-talkpage-header {border: none} html body .lqt-edit-introduction {display: none} html .lqt-post-wrapper {border-width: thin } html .lqt-thread-topmost > .lqt-post-wrapper {border-width: thin } .lqt_toc {margin-bottom: 2em;} .lqt_threadlevel_commands {margin-top: 0.5em;} .lqt_thread_heading {border-bottom: none } .lqt_view_options {display: none } html .lqt-thread-replies-interruption {border-left: thin solid silver }

title: MediaWiki:Gadget-lqtAlt.css


text:
MediaWiki:Gadget-lqtAlt.js

jQuery(function {  if (mw.config.get('wgNamespaceNumber') !== 102) return;

var elms = jQuery('.lqt_start_discussion a'); if (elms.length === 0) return; elms.button; jQuery('.lqt_header_commands li:first').addClass('lqt-edit-introduction'); });

title: MediaWiki:Gadget-lqtAlt.js


text:
MediaWiki:Gadget-lqtAlt

LQTalt - An alternative css style for LiquidThreads pages. (Probably not compatible with the Retro comments page gadget)

title: MediaWiki:Gadget-lqtAlt


text:
User talk:Angelusmemmv

-- 02:12, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Angelusmemmv


text:
User talk:The Talking Toaster

-- 02:32, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:The Talking Toaster


text:
User talk:Rgon87

-- 03:02, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rgon87


text:
User talk:LFGG

-- 03:39, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:LFGG


text:
User talk:Joaquincabrera08

-- 03:44, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Joaquincabrera08


text:
User talk:Flaviormelo

-- 03:58, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Flaviormelo


text:
User talk:Kanadadan91

-- 04:11, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kanadadan91


text:
User talk:EDUMAIA2011

-- 04:11, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:EDUMAIA2011


text:
User talk:Prabhulpkumar4ushambu

-- 04:14, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Prabhulpkumar4ushambu


text:
User talk:Coltsfan443

-- 04:29, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Coltsfan443


text:
User talk:ChrisKerrigan

-- 04:30, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:ChrisKerrigan


text:
User talk:Spsrajasps

-- 04:36, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Spsrajasps


text:
User talk:Erictennyson07

-- 05:11, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Erictennyson07


text:
Thread:Comments:'Where is your god now?': London policemen on trial accused of beating Muslim/Comments from feedback form - "Foul behavior from the guardia..."/reply (2)

^To the reply above me^

What a bigoted piece of s#!t you are. No one deserves brutality unless they've shown brutality, which was not the case here.


text:
User talk:Kanadayi

-- 05:27, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kanadayi


text:
User talk:Simranjit saini

-- 06:03, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Simranjit saini


text: Help:External editors

title: Help:External editors