text:
Talk:Elvis Presley/Archive 23

WikiProject Elvis Presley
I've created a WikiProject that will hopefully help focus the efforts of all of us involved with Elvis-related articles. Obviously, those of us who work on these articles collectively know pretty much everything there is to know about Elvis. However, we must keep in mind that this is an encyclopedia and just because it's published in a biography does not mean it should be included here. We want to present our knowledge to the reader as clearly and focused as possible, leaving out the gossip, hearsay and such. That's what the biographies are for. So, for what is relevant in terms of an encyclopedia, we want the readers to know everything we know.

In order to get things going in the most productive manner possible, I have the following proposal (which is reflected in the project pages, but can be changed if consensus does not support it):
 * A collaboration of the week, as many projects have. However, initially, rather than having a different article each week, we start with the Elvis article and do one section per week. With each section, we would follow a few short steps:
 * Paste the section, as it currently exists, to the talk page.
 * Discuss issues and possible changes.
 * Draft the rewrite and discuss.
 * Repeat steps 2 and 3 until consensus is reached.
 * Replace current section with the rewrite.

 * Should there be a need to extend the time frame to more than a week, that's fine. However, each section would get no less than one week. This allows all editors to have a say in each section—even those who only edit once per week.

If consensus supports this proposal, then we can start immediately. If everyone respects this, there should be no need for page protection. However, if edit wars resume and the page is once again protected, this process will still be able to go on as stated above. The only difference will be that only I or another involved admin will be able to replace the current version with the rewrite.

Please discuss.  Lara  ❤  Love  21:09, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Looks like a very workable idea. Rikstar 18:51, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * All articles have been assessed. Some still lack an importance rating, but they're at least all tagged. Now it's just a matter of article improvement. Shall we start today?  Lara  ❤  Love  18:55, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Still looks like a very workable idea. So... Early life currently reads as follows:

First draft
I propose shortening this to:

Discussion
This version gets rid of quotes (which I think are generally unencyclopedic) and cuts the section down to facts, with a bit of interest thrown in. Rikstar 18:51, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I like it for the most part, but I think the "mama's boy" quote is an important one. I also think the comments of "trashy boy making hillbilly music" should also be included. I think it adds context to see where he started compared to where he ended up. In the 1946 paragraph, I think it would read/flow better with a slight tweaking of the following part: "Presley practiced playing guitar in the laundry room and also played in a five-piece band with other tenants. He occasionally worked evenings to boost the family income, and began to grow his sideburns and dress in the wild, flashy clothes of Lansky Brothers on Beale Street. He stood out, especially in the conservative Deep South of the 1950s, and was mocked and bullied for it. "  Lara  ❤  Love  19:50, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Got no problems with that. I just tried to add the above to the wikiproject you created but realised you'd added your last comment. Apologies. Rikstar 20:03, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

I fully agree that the "mama's boy"quote is important —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.69.5.141 (talk) 13:48, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

I disagree

Second draft

 * Now would read as:

Rikstar 20:26, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Discussion
I endorse this version. It still lacks the trashy, hillbilly quote, but I missed at first that it was a quote from children, so I think it's fine to leave it out. I like this version.  Lara  ❤  Love  21:22, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

 * Agreed. I missed out ref. for five-piece band. Now added above. Rikstar 21:55, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

I really don't know if I have the stomach for going through this again, but I once provided a link to a presentation which stated that something like 2 out of every 3 children are bullied in school. (The other third are probably the bullies.) I don't see what's so noteworthy about Elvis being bullied. Most films about Elvis leave out any bullying scenes. Also, why pick on the South? By current standards, the entire country was conservative in the early/mid 50s. Yes, someone wrote it. A "reliable source", no doubt. The South was one of the first areas of the country where "black sounding" music was accepted by white people (there is a lot more complexity to this, but in general it's true), so how how could it have been more conservative than the rest of the country? As far as the trashy hillbilly music part, you "should" see that in reaction to some of the early public performances, and you could use a Barbara Pittman quote that can be heard at the Experience Music Project in Seattle that is specifically about this, though not specifically about Elvis.

Oh, and how do we know that any time we spend one this version of the article will stay around after protection is lifted? Steve Pastor 23:55, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

 * The bullied comment is removed in the above version. That's a good point about the South accepting black music before the rest of the country. This is the sort of stuff I don't think about. As for how will we know it will stay around after protection is lifted, we don't. But, if revisions are not appropriate and not discussed and agreed on here on the talk page, they'll be reverted. Once the article again achieves GA, it will be permalinked in the article history. Same with FA, should we get there.  Lara  ❤  Love  04:40, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

 * Good points. The rewrite does mention he was "mocked and bullied", but because of his unconventional appearance. This seems to be a valid comment based on the sources I've read. I think it's significant because it shows he didn't give in to such intimidation. This attitude may well have contributed to him maintaining unconventional ways - not just regarding his looks - but with music, song choice, etc.

 * As for: "He stood out, especially in the conservative Deep South of the 1950s, and was mocked and bullied for it. ". This could be amended to:

 * "He stood out, especially in the conservative 1950s, and was mocked and bullied for it. " (It could read: "... conservative America of the 1950s...", but I think that would be superfluous). Rikstar 09:24, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

 * Of the two, the former reads better, "conservative 1950s". However, it's occurred to me that the reference to him standing out in the deep south refers to his look, not his sound. So in that the south accepted black music before the rest of the country has no bearing on this statement. This refers to his sideburns and flashy clothes, not his music.  Lara  ❤  Love  19:09, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Er...Ummm...The sideburns and ducktail haircut came from truck drivers of that day and location. So, if you were used to being around truck drivers... Lansky Brothers were selling those flashy clothes to folks other than Elvis. Bullies will seize on ANY reason to torture a victim, and most people have been bullied in their lives. If we can't agree on what the quote was about, I say leave it out. Presley's early recorded song choices were based on what Sam Phillips thought would sell, and what Scotty, Bill, and Elvis knew how to play. Steve Pastor 20:10, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

I do not agree with the latest changes. Some important facts are missing:
 * Vernon has been described as "a malingerer, always averse to work and responsibility."
 * his wife, described as "voluble, lively, full of spunk".
 * Priscilla Presley recalls her as "a surreptitious drinker and alcoholic."
 * At the beginning of a biography we need some brief information about Elvis’s parents and their character. It shows the proletarian background of the singer’s family. The information also explains why Elvis was so close to his mother. According to Peter Guralnick, his mother Gladys "worshiped him from the day he was born." Elvis himself said, "My mama never let me out of her sight. I couldn't go down to the creek with the other kids." Later, Gladys was so proud of her boy, that she "would get up early in the morning to run off the fans so Elvis could sleep." She was frightened of Elvis being hurt: "She knew her boy, and she knew he could take care of himself, but what if some crazy man came after him with a gun? she said...tears streaming down her face."

 * Presley was bullied at school; classmates threw "things at him—rotten fruit and stuff—because he was different... quiet and he stuttered and he was a mama's boy."
 * This passage should not be removed, as it is well sourced and gives a nice impression of Elvis’s unpopularity at school at that time. At the start of his fame, guitarist Scotty Moore still attested that the singer was a "typical coddled son" and "very shy": "His mama would corner me and say, 'Take care of my boy. Make sure he eats. Make sure he -' You know, whatever. Typical mother stuff." But Elvis "didn't seem to mind; there was nothing phony about it, he truly loved his mother." Moore adds that Elvis "was more comfortable just sitting there with a guitar than trying to talk to you."

 * The conservative “Deep South” makes sense as all of Elvis’s friends were described as Southern boys and the singer was later accused of racism. His poor, white origins in deeply racist Mississippi, his purchase of an old Memphis mansion, and his association with right-wing politicians such as Richard Nixon have often been cited as proof of his conservative feelings. Here is Michael T. Bertrand, Race, Rock, and Elvis (University of Illinois Press, 2000):
 * There are several reasons why no subject associated with Presley causes greater controversy and conflict than that of race. He was, after all, a white performer whose financial success rested upon the songs and styles of black artists historically excluded from the popular music marketplace. Second, he hailed from the former slave-holding and segregated South. Third, he belonged to a white working class traditionally antagonistic to its African American counterpart. Fourth, upon achieving affluence, he purchased an antebellum-style mansion in Memphis that to many recalled the Old South as represented in Gone with the Wind. Fifth, he associated with racially conservative politicians such as George Wallace and Richard Nixon. Finally, he presumably uttered a racial slur on at least one public occasion during his career. (p.26)
 * As the bearer of too many painful images and memories, Presley has become a symbol of all that was oppressive to the black experience in the Western Hemisphere. (p.27)
 * Many have almost systematically insisted that Presley, "looking the part of a hillbilly racist," generated nothing but distrust within the black community. A black southerner in the late 1980s captured that sentiment: "To talk to Presley about blacks was like talking to Adolph Hitler about the Jews." One journalist wrote upon the singer's death that African Americans refused to participate in the numerous eulogies dedicated to him. (p.200)

Interestingly, only critical information has been removed. This is not acceptable. Onefortyone 19:14, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * What critical information is that, 141?  Lara  ❤  Love  19:21, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Some examples. Elvis's father was "a malingerer, always averse to work and responsibility," his mother was described as "a surreptitious drinker and alcoholic." Elvis's classmates threw "things at him—rotten fruit and stuff." See also the conservative “Deep South” passage etc. Onefortyone 19:28, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Furthermore, the current version reads: The following passage should be added:
 * In 1946, Presley got his first guitar.
 * In 1946, Presley's mother took Elvis to Tupelo Hardware to get him a birthday present. Although he wanted a rifle, he left the store with a $7.90 guitar.
 * It is of some importance that young Elvis wanted a rifle. According to Mark Crispin Miller, “Elvis gradually became an explosive megalomaniac as his wealth and boredom increased over the years. ... He loved guns, and regularly shot out television sets and light fixtures, sometimes nearly killing various acquaintances.” See Mark Crispin Miller, Boxed in: The Culture of TV (Northwestern University Press, 1988), p.191. Onefortyone 19:50, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

I'd rather see a quote specific to Elvis and his mother rather than the descriptive quotes regarding his parents. I also like the quote that young Elvis "was more comfortable just sitting there with a guitar than trying to talk to you". However, the point is to trim the article so that all the information is presented in fewer words, so I disagree with your need to add information on top of information. We don't need example after example, quote after quote, to get this information across. Make the statement and support it with multiple references. Not all the references have to be quoted.  Lara  ❤  Love  20:01, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * The information must be added. The wording may be changed. However, short quotes from mainstream biographies show that reliable sources have been used. This is fully in line with Wikipedia policies. Onefortyone 20:05, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Ditto what Lara wrote about the non necessity of the information 141 wants included. Steve Pastor 20:13, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * The problem is that Elvis fans such as Steve Pastor are trying to exclude critical information from the article. Onefortyone 20:19, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 141, I don't believe all of the above information is necessary. Some only adds to further explain certain aspects of his life. It's better to state something clearly supported by references than to give three examples, in my opinion, when writing an encyclopedic article. Also, you don't have to quote a reference to show it's reliable. It's place on the reference list accomplishes that.  Lara  ❤  Love  20:15, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Sorry Lara, the facts that Elvis's father was "always averse to work and responsibility" and that his mother was an alcoholic etc. are important. Onefortyone 20:22, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * What context does that add? And your comments regarding Steve Pastor are not productive. Assume good faith. We're all here to improve the article. Just because some of us don't agree with you does not mean we're acting in bath faith.  Lara  ❤  Love  20:23, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * The information about Vernon explains why Elvis was a mama's boy. Gladys began to drink excessively because Elvis was away from her. She died very early because of her alcoholism. This is important and deeply influenced Elvis's life. Onefortyone 20:29, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * That's not how it read/reads. Just throwing the information in there does not put it into context. And not all readers are going to put that together. Write it into a paragraph in such a way as to explain that without using more wording than necessary.  Lara  ❤  Love  20:49, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * This means that the first paragraph should be extended. This may be possible. We can also return to one of the former versions of the paragraph, if you agree. For instance, in order to underscore that Elvis was heavily bullied at school, it could be added that Elvis was cornered in the bathroom of his school by a couple of boys with scissors, but was rescued by upperclassman Red West. See Connie Kirchberg and Marc Hendrickx, Elvis Presley, Richard Nixon, and the American Dream (1999), p.6-7. Onefortyone 20:56, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

(←) None of the former versions I read explained it. If you're up to it, draft it below. Otherwise, I'll try something when I get off work.  Lara  ❤  Love  21:13, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Here is an excerpt from one of these older versions:
 * Elvis's parents were very protective. He "grew up a loved and precious child. He was, everyone agreed, unusually close to his mother." His mother Gladys "worshiped him," said a neighbor, "from the day he was born." Elvis himself said, "My mama never let me out of her sight. I couldn't go down to the creek with the other kids." In his teens, Elvis was still a very shy person, a "kid who had spent scarcely a night away from home in his nineteen years." He was teased by his fellow classmates who threw "things at him - rotten fruit and stuff - because he was different, because he was quiet and he stuttered and he was a mama's boy." Psychologists believe that the disappearance of his father "Vernon from Elvis' life when the King was three (Vernon was jailed for passing bad cheques) had a profound effect upon Elvis' emotional development" at an age when "a child naturally goes through a separation anxiety from its mother, which fathers can often help with. Elvis only had Gladys. They slept in the same bed up until Elvis was a young teen." Guitarist Scotty Moore still attested that the singer was a "typical coddled son" and "very shy": "His mama would corner me and say, 'Take care of my boy. Make sure he eats. Make sure he -' You know, whatever. Typical mother stuff." But Elvis "didn't seem to mind; there was nothing phony about it, he truly loved his mother." Gladys was so proud of her boy, that she "would get up early in the morning to run off the fans so Elvis could sleep".
 * See . See also, , , , etc. However, much of this material has been removed. Onefortyone (talk) 21:59, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Also, are you going to be willing to agree to the removal of any supporting information from this article? Particularly in sections where a main article exists for such expansion of information?  Lara  ❤  Love  21:17, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I do not believe that it is necessary to remove all supporting information from the article. Many other biographical articles also include such information. In my opinion, important details that deeply affected Elvis's life should not be removed from the main article, especially if they are well sourced and part of most books on Elvis. Onefortyone (talk) 21:59, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * This isn't really getting us very far is it? The material he cites above belongs in a detailed biog. 141 appears to want to use wikipedia to write his own biog of Presley. Does he want to help write an article that is worthy of GA/FA status? I have asked this question several times before, and 141 has not responded. Rikstar (talk) 22:32, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Yes, Rikstar, I indeed want to help write a well-balanced article that is worthy of GA/FA status. Therefore, critical material should not be removed. For comparison, here are some excerpts from the Wikipedia page on rock singer Frank Black. It is listed among the featured articles. See. There are several quotes in the “Youth and college” section of this article:
 * Charles Thompson was born in Boston, Massachusetts on April 6, 1965. His father was a bar owner, and Thompson first lived in Los Angeles, California as a baby because his father wanted to "learn more about the restaurant and bar business". Thompson was introduced to music at a young age, as his parents listened to 1960s folk rock. His first guitar was his mother's, a Yamaha classical guitar bought with money from his father's bar tips, which he started to play at age "11 or 12".
 * Thompson's family moved around, first with his father, and then his stepfather, a religious man who "pursued real estate on both coasts"; his parents had separated twice by the time he was in first grade. ... Thompson later described the music he listened to during his youth:

I used to hang out with some misfits. [...] We were the 'we listen to odd-ball music' kids. I wasn't hanging out at all-ages shows or trying to get into clubs to see bands, and I was buying records at used records stores and borrowing them from the library. You just saw Emerson, Lake & Palmer records. So I didn't know [punk] music but I started to hear about it in high school. But it was probably a good thing that I didn't know it, that I instead listened to a lot of '60s records and this religious music.

Query: if there are so many quotes in this featured article on Frank Black, why should similar quotes be removed from the Elvis article, especially if they are well sourced and throw light on the many diverse aspects of Elvis's colorful life? Onefortyone (talk) 00:22, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Thompson shared a room with another roommate for a semester before moving in with future Pixies guitarist Joey Santiago. The two shared an interest in rock music, and Santiago introduced Thompson to 1970s punk and the music of David Bowie; they began to jam together.
 * In his second year of college, Thompson embarked on a trip to San Juan, Puerto Rico as part of an exchange program. He spent six months in an apartment with a "weird, psycho, gay roommate", who later served as a direct inspiration for the Pixies' song "Crackity Jones"; many of the band's early songs refer to Thompson's experiences in Puerto Rico. Thompson failed to grasp the Spanish language, and left his studies after debating whether he would go to New Zealand to view Halley's Comet (he later said it "seemed like the cool romantic thing to do at the time"), or start a rock band. He wrote a letter urging Santiago, with the words "we gotta do it, now is the time Joe", to join him in a band upon his return to Boston.

Neutral point of view states, This means that well-sourced information should not be removed because some users didn’t like the information. Onefortyone (talk) 01:07, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * All Wikipedia articles and other encyclopedic content must be written from a neutral point of view (NPOV), representing fairly and, as much as possible, without bias all significant views (that have been published by reliable sources). This is non-negotiable and expected on all articles, and of all article editors.
 * The neutral point of view is a means of dealing with conflicting verifiable perspectives on a topic as evidenced by reliable sources. The policy requires that where multiple or conflicting perspectives exist within a topic each should be presented fairly. None of the views should be given undue weight or asserted as being judged as "the truth", in order that the various significant published viewpoints are made accessible to the reader, not just the most popular one. It should also not be asserted that the most popular view, or some sort of intermediate view among the different views, is the correct one to the extent that other views are mentioned only pejoratively. Readers should be allowed to form their own opinions.

Here are some commentaries by third-party users concerning the Elvis page: These commentaries speak volumes. Onefortyone (talk) 01:31, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Elvis was a controversial figure. His sexuality, drug taking, divorce, eating disorders etc etc all attract differing points of view. To some he was a god; to others a fat bloke who died on the toilet. For many aspects of his life there is no definitive answer. He is dead and people will continue to write with bias and an agenda. To attempt to compromise, this article needs to show both sides with suitable references and let the reader decide. Unfortunately brevity and balance appear to be mutually exclusive but until both sides are allowed their say this article will fall further into disrepute.--Egghead06 (talk) 09:35, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I just think that when a user expresses an interest in additions, you can't tell him that it's closed to new content. It's discouraging. You mention a rewrite, and I assume that it means you are open to revisions: removals and additions. The guinea pig article is huge, but if there is good information out there, I can't let size take precedent over content. If the general consensus on the article talk is that it's too large, that's one thing, but consensus changes. the_undertow talk  00:59, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Frank Black is 40kb. Guinea pig is 60kb. Elvis is the size of them both combined, literally. It's topics branch off into 15 main articles. Not everything has to be included in this article. The basic information explained and supported here, expanded in the main articles. Give the reader the details, all the aspects, all the points of view. But you don't have to use 3 examples for every claim. We also don't need quotes from so many people. In many cases, it's one person's opinion, and not even always a notable person's opinion.  Lara  ❤  Love  07:45, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Frank Black is not such a big figure as Elvis. You should compare the size of the Elvis page with Wikipedia pages on other important figures in popular music. For instance, the good article on Paul McCartney is more than 123 kb, the featured article on Bob Dylan is more than 126 kb. Furthermore, the article still doesn’t include all details and points of view concerning Elvis’s life and career. For instance, there are no details about Elvis’s personal life at Graceland, his family life and the problems he had with his stepmother. Some critical points are still missing. There is nothing on his love of guns and his predilection for dangerous games to be found in the article. It has not been mentioned that several of his friends were badly treated by the singer and that Elvis was of the opinion that "the Smothers Brothers, Jane Fonda, and other persons in the entertainment industry of their ilk," had "poisoned young minds by disparaging the United States in their public statements and unsavory activities", etc. etc. Onefortyone (talk) 21:01, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I agree with LaraLove, and would emphasize the need to confine extra details - critical or otherwise - to the branch articles. Also, details about Gladys' alcoholism don't need stating in Early years when they are/can be covered in the section dealing with his mother's death (didn't she drink excessively after his "early years"?). I am pleased 141 has now declared he is 'on board' with other editors; I hope he agrees with myself and LaraLove about the need to keep multiple examples out when one will do, and that this has nothing to do with the suppression of criticism by "Elvis fans". Rikstar (talk) 09:54, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Elvis's mother was an alcoholic from the beginning. This must be mentioned in the "Early years" section. Furthermore, I am not of the opinion that significant quotes should be omitted, as many of these quotes represent the knowledge of authorities on Elvis from different points of view. As Egghead06 said, "this article needs to show both sides with suitable references and let the reader decide." Onefortyone (talk) 21:01, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Precisely. To clarify (because I apparently am being misunderstood to some not involved with the article), I don't want any critical information removed. I'm am an Elvis fan, but of his music and look, not so much his life and how he lived it. I want all the information there, as I believe Rikstar and others do. I just want the non-critical supporting details that are not necessary removed or moved to the branch articles.  Lara  ❤  Love  14:30, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Onefortyone, would you mind posting your desired section in the draft section below so we can work from there?  Lara  ❤  Love  21:53, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Third draft
This is my desired section. Onefortyone (talk) 00:42, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Discussion
It's longer than the current version. I think it's actually the current version rearranged with an extra sentence or two.  Lara  ❤  Love  01:47, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

 * So, after 141's considerable efforts to convince us that Gladys was a drunk because she missed Elvis, now we have the assertion that she was a drunk before that anyway. Which is true? Why not avoid needless conflict like this and just leave it out of this section?

 * Why do we need psychologists' beliefs about Presley's closeness to his mother? The draft states they were close. Gladys lost one son at childbirth. Why isn't this a stated reason for them being close? Because it's just more speculation.

 * The kid wanted a rifle. Why jump in to stuff about blowing out TV sets? Why at all? What a tenuous link, and so early in the article. This third draft is much worse than the second. And it's unnecessarily long. Why can't we keep it simple? The only useful addition is the Scotty Moore observation. Rikstar (talk) 21:51, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

 * Elvis's mother was an alcoholic before she missed Elvis. She died very young because of alcohol-induced liver disease. LaraLove recommended to put the information into context so that "all readers are going to put that together." That's what I did. Psychologists believe that Elvis's closeness to his mother had a profound effect upon the singer's emotional development. This is very important and puts facts into context. The same is with Elvis's love of guns. Onefortyone (talk) 23:54, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Do we really need to know that Elvis and his mother "slept in the same bed up until Elvis was a young teen", whether it is true or not? I hope this sort of thing won't be in any version of this article. Steve Pastor (talk) 22:56, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Why not? If it illustrates the poverty of his early life and is properly sourced, what is the problem? It would have been fairly common for family members in the southern states to share sleeping arrangements at that time, and any sexual innuendo is surely in the mind of the beholder. You also have to remember that sexual maturity and awareness occurred at older ages back then. -- Rodhullandemu  (please reply here - contribs) 23:04, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

I grew up in public housing and was poor in the same general time as Elvis, not 30 miles from the Mason Dixon line. I did not sleep with my mother. Nevertheless, if it was so common, then why include it? The banal nature of some of this stuff, such as the tales of bullying, call for exclusion from the article. Regardless, of whether it was "common in the south", as you state, mainstream media generally respects the private aspects of something like who slept with whom. Of course, you have to buy into the idea that even public figures deserve some kind of privacy. I understand that in this day and age, these standards are either breaking down, or have already broken down. Given the need to exclude information to make the article an acceptable size, I think it should be left out. Steve Pastor (talk) 23:21, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * The information that Elvis slept in his mother's bed up until he was a young teen both underscores the poverty of Elvis's early life and the closeness to his mother. Elvis was heavily bullied at school. He was even cornered in the bathroom of his school by a couple of boys with scissors, but was rescued by upperclassman Red West. See Connie Kirchberg and Marc Hendrickx, Elvis Presley, Richard Nixon, and the American Dream (1999), p.6-7. These are important facts having a profound effect on Elvis's life. Onefortyone (talk) 00:01, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

FYI "Bullying is a common experience for many children and adolescents. Surveys indicate that as many as half of all children are bullied at some time during their school years, and at least 10% are bullied on a regular basis." Steve Pastor (talk) 01:11, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
 * And Steve Pastor (talk) 01:18, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

This is from the Archeive of this page, regarding the bullying information. "At one point we agreed to take it out, and it is back. See page 5 of the presentation at this url [10].In this study only 31% of students reported that they HADN'T been bullied. I identify with anyone who has been the victim of bullies, but can anyone make a good argument as to why this is so important that it shouldn't be deleted? Steve Pastor 00:12, 3 November 2007 (UTC)" My question was never answered, so I ask it again. And hope for something more than more quotes from books. Steve Pastor (talk) 01:22, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
 * As far as I can remember, there was no agreement to take the bullying information out. It is very important that Elvis was heavily bullied at school, as it had a great influence on his later predilection for Karate and playing dangerous games with his guys. Onefortyone (talk) 03:10, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
 * So, is the thinking that they slept together because they were poor and could only afford one bed? And that Elvis was close to his mother because they had slept together? And by the way, was it Elvis or his mother that is quoted saying that they did in fact sleep together? Steve Pastor (talk) 01:27, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
 * It was Elvis's father Vernon who said that Elvis and his mother slept together. Most published biographies include these facts. In addition, here is reputed Elvis expert Elaine Dundy on Gladys Smith's house:
 * The Smiths' house - you would have to call it a shack - would have been made of Mississippi pine... Inside, it would have a "breezeway," a hall running through the center from the front door to the back door. The front room would contain only one proper iron bedstead covered with a patchwork quilt. The bed would be placed diagonally against two walls, this being the position in which it would take up the least amount of space, while at the same time allowing room on either side of the bed to get in and out of it. All the children, except the youngest, who always slept in the same bed with its parents, slept on what were called "made beds" on the floor. Pallets were stuffed with clean soft crabgrass and sewn into what they called a thicket. And they all slept in the same room."
 * See Elaine Dundy, Elvis and Gladys, p.31. The same author writes about Gladys's close relationship with her son:
 * it was agony for her to leave her child even for a moment with anyone else, to let anyone else touch Elvis. Maternal love was not for Gladys a prettily sentimental attachment. Rather it was a passionate concentration which deepened into a painful intensity when her son was not there, directly in her sight. She imagined all sorts of horrors. She imagined he was being tortured and she was not there to stop it. It was physical torment for her to be separated from him. Maternal devotion is constantly misrepresented as either grasping, clinging, stifling or pathetic. It is none of these things. Every mother of a very young child has the primordial conviction, deeper than reason, that as long as her child is within her eyesight she will be able to protect him from all harm. Generally the mother outgrows this as the child grows up but Gladys all her life remained anxious over each one of Elvis' separations from her.
 * See p.71. Dundy adds on page 77 that neighbors also had "stories of Elvis' precocious solicitude towards his mother." Elvis always watched her and comforted her: " 'There, there, my little baby.' This strange reversal of roles between the parent and the child often takes place when one parent is absent." (p.80) Interestingly, "Vernon and Gladys were always 'his babies,' which was how the adult Elvis referred to them." (p.81) All this shows how unusually close Elvis was to his mother and how much this close relationship affected his life. Onefortyone (talk) 03:13, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for providing the attribution, although I note that there is no direct quote from Vernon. Note that the words the author used were "would have" rather than "did have" or "was" when describing the house. This is an indication that the author was describing typical conditions rather than the specific conditions. A good writer choses words carefully. There is no question that Elvis was close to his mother, but the choice of words in draft 3 will lead to misinterpretation by most readers without too much added text. The word salacious comes to mind also. And, again, we aren't writing an Elvis biography here.
 * Regading previous removal regarding bullying...Probably, the rest of us agreed to remove it, and you didn't. Rikstar has again included the bully bit in draft 4. So, if in spite of the fact that bullying is commonplace (and I hope you all have looked at the links I provided) and I was bullied, too, I would say heavily, and I didn't grow up to shoot tvs, etc.... Steve Pastor (talk) 20:31, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

4th draft
A revision, to reduce it's length and redundant wording, for what its worth. I hope editors will note it is not simply a revert and that content remains because it has been discussed above. It isn't my preferred version, but like any decent editor, I am trying to accommodate others. Rikstar (talk) 11:33, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Discussion
The first sentence reads, I think it is important to mention that Vernon was "a malingerer, always averse to work and responsibility." This passage should not be removed, as there is no further information about the character of Elvis's father in the article and it underscores why Elvis's mother had such a strong influence upon her son. This passage may be shorter:
 * Presley's father, Vernon (April 10, 1916–June 26, 1979) had several low-paying jobs, including sharecropper and truck driver.
 * At age ten, Presley made his first public performance in a singing contest at the Mississippi-Alabama Fair and Dairy Show. Dressed as a cowboy, he had to stand on a chair to reach the microphone and sang Red Foley's "Old Shep." He won second prize.
 * At age ten, Presley won second prize in a singing contest at the Mississippi-Alabama Fair and Dairy Show. Dressed as a cowboy, he sang Red Foley's "Old Shep." Onefortyone (talk) 19:35, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Or:
 * At age ten, Presley won second prize in a singing contest at the Mississippi-Alabama Fair and Dairy Show for his rendition of Red Foley's "Old Shep".  Lara _ Love  20:15, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I agree to shortening the Old Shep bit and prefer the above version. I think we could get rid of the direct quote about Vernon and make it:

As far as the above discussion regarding his early life, there seems to me to be enough relevant, sourced information to create a main article on the matter. Thoughts?  Lara _ Love  20:15, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Vernon has been described as a malingerer, averse to work and responsibility [I think it reads better]. Rikstar (talk) 14:44, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
 * You're probably right, but every section could potentially have its own main article. Would that be acceptable? Rikstar (talk) 14:44, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I would think so. He's notable, and those years are sourced. It will be illustrated. This article needs to be shortened for readability. It should touch on all the major points and leave the reader with an understanding and knowledge of all the important aspects of his life and career. It should leave them wanting to read more, and for that, we expand in main articles on each topic. I see no reason his early years can't support a stand-alone article. There's certainly enough information. I assume these biographies go into more details regarding his parents, no? I don't know about them. I'm interested to find out more. This is a good way to make that available to everyone who hasn't read the bios. Lara  _Love   Talk  19:44, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

 * I am not so sure if it is really necessary that every section should have its own main article. As a colorful personality, Elvis needs one comprehensive article including many facts concerning his life and career. Query: how many users are going to read all the additional material presented in extra articles? Onefortyone (talk) 22:41, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * How many users are going to read an article the length of a book?  Lara  ❤  Love  14:59, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

I have now included the 4th draft of the first section with minor changes in the article. It is shorter than the previous version. I hope this is satisfactory to all. Onefortyone (talk) 05:55, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Original Research ?
On a quick skim-through here, I've noticed a number of original research violations. Specifically this paragraph which I have removed, is a synthesis of sources serving to advance a position (check out this WP:NOR, and this WP:SYN). From experience its quite easy to fall into this sort of trap when writing articles or essay's, so we'd best be on the lookout. Time permiting I will take a closer look at the article for more orignal research, any help would be appreciated.GiantSpitoon (talk) 23:21, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * The material you have removed is well sourced, as it is backed up by several mainstream biographies on Elvis (among them authorities such as Alanna Nash and Peter Guralnick) and eyewitness accounts of women the singer dated. You may include quotes from other sources contradicting the statements given in the said section, if there are any such sources, but do not remove well-sourced material that is not in line with your personal opinion. Here is Peter Guralnick, Last Train to Memphis: The Rise of Elvis Presley (1994), p. 415, on Elvis's alleged affairs with girls:
 * He was still seeing Yvonne Lime occasionally, but he was dating Anne Neyland, a former Miss Texas whom he had met on the MGM lot, and Venetia Stevenson, too, when a rumor that he was about to marry Yvonne in Acapulco broke at the end of May. "When I get married," he told the press, after the Colonel 's official denials, "it'll be no secret. I'll get married in my hometown of Memphis, and the whole town'll be there." He wasn't really serious about anyone for the time being, though. He was enjoying the single life, and when he got bored he just had to tell the guys to hunt up some girls in the lobby of the hotel. He would have them brought up to the suite, offered one observer, "and Elvis would go in the other room, he'd go in the bedroom or somewhere, and then when they came back with the girls, the girls would sit there for maybe ten or fifteen minutes, and finally one of the cousins would go in the bedroom and come out himself and another ten minutes would go by - and then in would come Elvis. And there would be like a silence, and then the cousins would say, 'Oh, Mary Jane, this is Elvis,' and the girls would be totally gone." For the more experienced girls it wasn't like with other Hollywood stars or even with other more sophisticated boys they knew. They offered to do things for him, but he wasn't really interested. What he liked to do was to lie in bed and watch television and eat and talk all night...
 * There can be no doubt that Elvis wasn't overtly sexually active. Onefortyone (talk) 18:16, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Well-sourced is irrespective of the point, what you are doing is drawing these sources together to advance a position which you appeared to have reached yourself, and that is original research; in other words your creating a new narrative from a pile of sources you have hand-picked - a big no no. Also, the above quotation you have given is open to interpretation and does not explicitly state what you conclude from it (for example, that may just be ONE ocassion here Presley decided not to do whatever...). Your conclusion that Presley was not generally overtly sexually active from this and other sources bundled together is just that, YOUR CONCLUSION, and is thus original research. Oh, and I do not appreciate being accused of removing material based on the fact that I personally don't like it, please assume good faith in the future as I am with you.GiantSpitoon (talk) 22:52, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

 * No, you are wrong. It is not my conclusion, as most sources say that Elvis was not overtly sexually active. Even his ex-wife Priscilla confirms that this was the case. By the way, it is very interesting that you, as a new user, are well informed about Wikipedia pages such as WP:NOR and WP:AGF and that you are so keenly interested in removing well-sourced content from the Elvis article. This strongly suggests that you may be a sockpuppet of another user who was edit warring on Elvis Presley in the past. Therefore, I cannot assume good faith. Onefortyone (talk) 20:18, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

 * Unless you have a published source which draws your same conclusion based on the sources you have presented, what you have included is synthesis of published sources which advance an unpubished view point, and is therefore original research under WP:SYN. Whether it's well sourced or not doesn't matter! From a quick glance your most sources is a mere handful, and you cannot draw a conclusion yourself based on that handful (or even a more substantial amount) that Presley was not very sexually active. Also, please stop questioning my motives, just because I've read many of wikipedia's policies (like every new user should!) and am proactive in removing original research, that doesn't all of a sudden mean I'm a sockpuppet of anyone! I AM NOT here to pick fights, or remove 'well-sourced' information without reason, but I will remove original research where I can; that's my main interest here. And, to show my good faith, I volunteer to step back from editing out the paragraph and await further comment from the community.GiantSpitoon (talk) 23:32, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

 * I agree with GiantSpitoon that this article is of very low quality due to the absurd level of "original research" being attempted here. There appears to be a continuing obsession with salacious trivia, and this article could use a vigorous amount of content pruning. The subject, Elvis, deserves Good Article status, but the presentation is bogged down with excessive amounts of pointless and unencyclopedic rubbish pushing questionable Points of View. Since I'm not the only one who feels this way, I'm sure that we could soon get to work trimming a lot of this improperly-presented content. Hoserjoe (talk) 22:45, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

During the time that I have participated in this article, 141 has outlasted all other editors, in spite of having been previously taken to arbitration for the same behavior that has been exhibited since being allowed back into the article. Numberous editors have removed 141's contributions repeatedly. 141, however, persists. Steve Pastor (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 23:17, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

 * It is interesting how one or two Elvis fans endeavor to uphold the myth of Elvis's intensive sex life that is primarily being promoted on some fan sites in order to stress the megastar's masculinity. However, too many independent sources say otherwise, and this is what counts on Wikipedia. According to reputed Elvis biographer Alanna Nash, "the so-called dangerous rock-and-roll idol was anything but a despotic ruler in the bedroom" and he "would never put himself inside one of these girls..." The author also writes that Elvis was overly attached to his mother and could not relate normally to mature women. During his military service, he had "discovered prostitutes and picked up the intense fear of sexually transmitted diseases which led to claims that he had a morbid fear of sexual penetration." June Juanico "recalls a time when she stood up to Elvis in front of his band of hangers-on, who even then were beginning to accompany him everywhere. He grabbed her arm, took her into the bathroom and declared: 'Look, you are so right, I am really sorry.' He kept her there for five minutes, then swaggered out, his image intact." See Tracy McVeigh, "Elvis Special: Love me tender." The Observer, Sunday August 11, 2002. Actress June Wilkinson remembered that Elvis gave her "a tour of his suite, sat me on the bed in his bedroom and sang to me for two hours. That was it." See Paul Parla and Charles P. Mitchell, Screen Sirens Scream!: Interviews with 20 Actresses from Science Fiction, Horror, Film Noir and Mystery Movies, 1930s to 1960s (2000). Cassandra Peterson alias 'Elvira' says she knew Presley for only one night and all they did was talk. See Ruthe Stein, "Girls! Girls! Girls! From small-town women to movie stars, Elvis loved often but never true," San Francisco Chronicle, August 3, 1997. In her memoir, Breathing Out (St. Martin's Press, 2005), Peggy Lipton relates that Elvis was like a "teenage boy". "He didn't feel like a man next to me - more like a boy who'd never matured." When he tried to make love with Lipton, "he just wasn't up to sex. Not that he wasn't built, but with me, at least, he was virtually impotent." In an interview, Cybill Shepherd reveals that Presley kissed her all over her naked body - but refused to have oral sex with her. His slow tender kisses ended at her bellybutton. Elvis explained to her, "Me and the guys talk and, well, white boys don't eat pussy." According to his own words, Elvis "didn't make love to Anita Wood the whole four years [he] went with her" "Just to a point. Then I stopped. It was difficult for her too, but that's just how I feel." In her book, Elvis and me, Priscilla Presley writes that she "felt sure the night would end with Elvis finally making love to me. I was drunk with ecstasy. I wanted him. I became bolder, reaching out to him, totally open and honest in my need. Then, as before when we'd reach this point, he stopped and whispered, 'Don't get carried away, Baby. Let me decide when it should happen. It's a very sacred thing to me. It always has been. You know that I want it to be something to look forward to." In another chapter, Priscilla says, "Any sexual temptations were against everything he was striving for, and he did not wish to betray me, the girl waiting for him at home who was preparing to be his wife." "Fearful of not pleasing him-of destroying my image as his little girl - I resigned myself to the long wait." According to sexual psychologists, "Elvis never made love to her again after the birth of his daughter, and would never have sex with a woman who had had a baby." See Carol Martin-Sperry, Couples and Sex: An Introduction to Relationship Dynamics and Psychosexual Concepts (2004). Reputed Elvis biographer Peter Guralnick concludes that for "the more experienced girls it wasn't like with other Hollywood stars or even with other more sophisticated boys they knew." Although they offered to do things for Presley, "he wasn't really interested. What he liked to do was to lie in bed and watch television and eat and talk all night..." If there are any other sources that contradict these many accounts which say that Elvis wasn't overtly sexually active, would you please cite them. According to Wikipedia policy, the "cite sources" guideline is the best way to ensure that you do not violate the NOR policy. "In short, the only way to demonstrate that you are not presenting original research is to cite reliable sources that provide information directly related to the topic..." That's what I have done. Onefortyone (talk) 02:40, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

 * I'm just repeating myself again, but oh well ... This great big wad of text doesn't change the fact that the way they are presented is original research! Once again, I am citing WP:SYN here, you have drawn these hand-picked sources together to further the unpublished conclusion based on these that Presley was not 'overtly sexually active' - this creates a new narrative, and is therefore original research. Here, you cannot argue that because someone claimed this, and another person stated that, therefore one may conclude that fish can talk - for example; we're not writing an essay here! And, like I've said before (hint! hint!) its made worse in this case because many of the sources you present are open to interpretation (for example, because someone said Presley was like a 'teenage boy' does that necessarily mean he's not very sexually active?), or questionable (did those 'sexual psychologists' camp out near Presley's bed with a pad and pen? I wonder...). GiantSpitoon (talk) 04:24, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Dennis Hopper once said in an interview that Elvis was with four girls at the same time. When Dennis asked Elvis if he had sex with all four at the same time he replied "yes". A female friend has said on an E!TV special that Elvis had as many as 7 girls at a time in what she described as a Elvis having different woman in different rooms waiting for him. They joined him after he was finished. Juliet Prowse has stated on camera that Elvis was not only a wonderful kisser but a wonderful lover. Anne Helm, his co-star in Follow That Dream has stated on record that her and Elvis had sex very frequently while filming that movie. Elvis' co-star Joan Blackman also stated that her and Elvis had sex frequently on the movie set. So why isn't this incorportated into that section? Is it because it totally wipes out Onefortyone's wish that Elvis was gay? I say that this section should be removed because it is not factual and is distorted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mfbinc (talk • contribs) 06:48, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

 * Would you please provide evidence that reliable sources exist that confirm your claims. If you can quote the exact passages, it would be possible to include parts of the material in the Wikipedia article on Elvis. I did some further research in order to prove what you have written. However, I have not yet confirmed most of your claims.
 * In his book, Drive-in Dream Girls: A Galaxy of B-Movie Starlets of the Sixties (2003), Tom Lisanti writes about Juliet Prowse, "Regarding her first reaction when learning that she was being paired with Presley, Prowse commented in Drama-Logue, 'My first thought was, "Oh my God. I'm going to work with a juvenile delinquent." That was my first impression of him. Well, he couldn't have been more the opposite. A terrific guy!' ... The chemistry between Presley and Prowse continued off-screen as the duo became an item despite Prowse's on-going affair with Frank Sinatra. To keep the momentum going on screen, producer Hal B. Wallis asked Fox to borrow Prowse again for Elvis's next movie Blue Hawaii (1961) since they worked so well together previously." Prowse "wanted movie star treatment" and Elvis as a companion because she "didn't know anyone else in company ... and he's always surrounded by a dozen buddies." However, she decided not to do the film: "I was only one of three girls in Elvis's life, and one 16-year-old had a more interesting part than mine." The way she handled the matter "made her come across as more of a pampered prima donna than a career-conscious actress. ... She killed her chances of ever working with Presley again... In 1962, despite her very public romance with Elvis Presley, Prowse accepted Frank Sinatra's marriage proposal. She was once again in the headlines..." (p.308-309). Does this sound as if Prowse and Presley were lovers? It seems as if Prowse dated the singer primarily for publicity reasons, as many other starlets did. In an interview with the San Francisco Chronicle, June Juanico "blames his manager, Colonel Tom Parker, for encouraging Presley to go out with beautiful women for the publicity."
 * Tom Weaver's book, I Was a Monster Movie Maker: Conversations with 22 SF and Horror Filmmakers (2001), includes a chapter on Anne Helm. The author writes that in the 1950s, Anne Helm was New York's top teenwear model who later appeared in some movies. In 1962, she "co-starred (and dallied off-screen)" with Elvis. It is not mentioned that they had a sexual affair.
 * Joan Blackman starred opposite Elvis in Blue Hawaii (1961), where they had an on-screen wedding. My sources do not mention that they "had sex frequently on the movie set," as you claim. What really happened on similar occasions is described by Julie Parrish, Presley's co-star in Paradise Hawaiian Style. The starlet relates, "One time on set I had a real pain in my side - a side-effect, I think - and Elvis scooped me up, carried me into his trailer and shut the door. Outside the crew was waiting and wondering, but Elvis was oblivious to the innuendo. He placed his hand over my side and tried to do some healing on me." See Tracy McVeigh, "Elvis Special: Love me tender." The Observer, Sunday August 11, 2002.
 * Bill Dakota writes,
 * Although many girls were invited to Elvis's mansion (it was printed in all the magazines), the evenings were spent watching television, drinking cokes and eating popcorn. No sex. Just television. There was an exception, I heard of. In Bel-Air one evening, Elvis is alleged to have had four girls taking turns giving him a blow-job. This was outside the mansion, at night, in the yard.
 * Actress, Yvonne Lime said, "For the most part, my time in Memphis was a quiet one. There were long hours of just sitting around, talking with Elvis and his parents. Or we'd watch television or gather around the piano and sing old Southern folk songs and spirituals. On Sunday I went to church with Elvis and his parents and afterwards a group of his old friends would drop by the house where we ate hot-dogs and danced and just sat around playing records and singing for hours and hours. And that was pretty much how we spent the six days I was there in Memphis."
 * See . This means that the story concerning the "four girls" was an exception. There can be no doubt that most sources agree that Elvis wasn't overtly sexually active. Onefortyone (talk) 23:08, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
 * NOBODY was "overtly sexually active" in the 1950s, you moron! It just wasn't done.  It's only a recent phenomenon that people give and get get blowjobs while driving, shopping, going to church, etc.  In the 50s, it was common practice to visit a girl's home and sing songs and eat popcorn - and not a whole lot more.  Maybe a goodnight kiss at the end of the evening.    —Preceding unsigned comment added by 154.20.129.40 (talk) 21:18, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

In regards to my posting Dennis Hopper and Juliet Prowse quotes on Elvis' sex life, I can't. The Dennis Hopper quote came from a network special on his life which featured Bono spouting poetry about Elvis, and  the Juliet Prowse quote came from clips of her speaking about Elvis in between commercials during a WTBS Elvis movie week special in the 90's.  She also bragged about being the only women ever to be sleeping with Elvis and Sinatra at the same time. I'm still trying to locate those clips. As far as Joan Blackman is concerned, I remember reading about how they had to air brush Elvis' famous Blue Hawaii ukulele shot because of a "hard- on" he had from fooling around with Joan right before the shot. As soon as I look through my extensive Elvis book collection I'll post the reference. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mfbinc (talk • contribs) 06:10, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * According to Tom Lisanti, Fantasy Femmes of Sixties Cinema (2000), p.282, Joan Blackman was "rumored to be one of Elvis's least favorite co-stars." Therefore, it seems unlikely that Joan and Elvis fooled around and fell in love right before the said shot. In fact, Elvis dated most of his female co-stars for publicity reasons, and the studio invented love stories in order to promote the movies. Onefortyone (talk) 23:20, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

 * I actually thought we were getting somewhere regarding 141's recent involvement in this article. But, the above comments and accusations - assuming bad faith, "Elvis fans" promoting their biased agendas, sockpuppetry claims - are depressingly familiar. I am on record as saying that 141 has the resources, intelligence and communication skills to help make this an excellent featured article, but these are yet again being squandered by 141's negative editing tactics. The original research argument seems a sound one in this case, and it may well apply to other edits in this article. This problem can be solved with some simply editing - it won't be the end of the world as we know it - yet 141 is tenacious to the point of being disruptive in protecting his own edits and promoting his personal agendas. As Steve Pastor says, it is 141 who has been in trouble for his editing behavior before, not those others who are currently trying to edit this article with him. I have veered between severe (and justified) admonishment of 141 and being forgiving, simply because 141 continues to edit the Presley article. It beggars belief that he is allowed to make the same tired accusations time and again, and that his pattern of disruptive editing and warring has not lead to another ban of some form. I now wish, in spite of my previous attempts at goodwill towards 141, that he was banned permanently. Has it not occurred to anyone else that here we are for the umpteenth time, all running around in circles getting het up as 141 calls the tunes?Rikstar (talk) 06:55, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Sorry, Rikstar, a supposed sockpuppet of user Joey Joe Joe Junior Shabadoo appeared on the scene removing, as usual, a well-sourced paragraph from the Elvis article and accusing me, without justification, of original research. Do you really think that this is OK? I hope not. The same thing happened several times in the past. There is much evidence that the said passage was deleted by a newly created sockpuppet. Compare, for instance, this edit with this one. See also and  and this edit by Mingy Jongo, one of the many other sockpuppets of Joey Joe Joe Junior Shabadoo, which includes the same accusations of original research. It is certainly no coincidence that GiantSpitoon, as a new user, is very familiar with Wikipedia pages such as WP:NOR or WP:AGF and even with the abbreviations used by Wikipedia administrators. Furthermore, apart from his interest in Elvis Presley, the very first edits by GiantSpitoon were contributions to Michael Jackson. See, . Significantly, Joey Joe Joe Junior Shabadoo (who, together with his other sockpuppets, also showed much interest in Elvis related topics) was voting against the good article reassessment of Michael Jackson because he found "this article to be quite biased and in general badly written." See , . By the way, before the recent accusations, we were talking about the 4th draft of the first section of the article and not about the "Sex symbol" section. See . Shouldn't we return to the previous discussion? Onefortyone (talk) 23:49, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I'd like to clarify a few things. Firstly, I'm disappointed onefortyone that you feel I've accused you of anything. All I've done is point toward a paragraph that in accordance with policy (WP:SYN) is original research, and judging from the posts of other users, I'm not alone in this stance. I'll repeat this again because apparently it didn't sink in the first time: I'm not out to attack anyone and I won't remove the contributions of others without a valid reason. We had minor dispute where we reverted which others edits, but instead of continuing I did the right thing by stopping the edit-war and taking it to the talk page for discussion, so why do you persist in attacking me? GiantSpitoon (talk) 03:30, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Sorry, GiantSpitoon, you claim in all innocence, "I'm disappointed onefortyone that you feel I've accused you of anything." Notwithstanding, your accusations are clearly directed at me: "what you are doing is drawing these sources together to advance a position which you appeared to have reached yourself, and that is original research..."; "what you have included is synthesis of published sources which advance an unpublished view point, and is therefore original research..." etc. Significantly, your first edit on Elvis Presley was the removal of an entire paragraph. See . And you removed it without comment on the talk page. The comment only appeared a day later, after I had reinstated the paragraph. See . However, it should be noted that most parts of the present state of the paragraph have been included by Rikstar. The said passage is an abridged version of a much longer paragraph written by me. Rikstar wrote, "Some of the above issues have been addressed by a new 'Sex Symbol' section. I felt this was an obvious addition, especially having read a lot of evidence which does support the idea that he wanted female company, but not always for sexual gratification." See . See also this edit. As for the few other Elvis fans supporting your removal (some of whom are supposed to be socksuppets), they have not yet provided reliable sources that contradict the well-sourced content of the "Sex symbol" paragraph. Onefortyone (talk) 18:43, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

If I thought it would make a difference to 141, I would go through the archeives and repeat the arguments that have been made by other editors as to why this material does not belong in this article. Since 141 has been unable or unwilling to understand, or accept any other viewpoints on this subject, that exercise would be pointless. Oh, how about this one, the article is too long and has to be trimmed. Steve Pastor (talk) 20:32, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Ha! It looks like 141, through sheer stubborn compulsive-obsessiveness, has seized control of the story of Elvis Presley. Unfortunately, the result has no relation to the life of EP, and just reflects the tedious obsessions of 141.  And that's a pity.

B Class rating
I've no objection to this, but the three comments under "The following comments have been left for this page" are all from assessments of the the FA candidate of over a year ago. The third comment is certainly no longer relevant, as there isn't a trivia section. My own comment - "However I am put off by the thought of the time it will take, and the inevitable interference that will come from those who have already made this article as bad as it is." - strikes me as still being of some relevance. Editing/discussion have gone quiet lately: I wonder why? I currently have no wish to continue trying to improve this article. It includes many bits that I and a consensus of others have tried to remove, but they remain because of the single-minded and inappropriate tenacity of one user. That user, Onefortyone, has asked me to return to discussing the Early years section, as if his other comments/contributions can be simply ignored. Dragging my name in to support his fight with GiantSpitoon earns no respect from me. This article is supposed to evolve into a better one over time; my views on what should or should not be included have also changed, in marked contrast to 141's general agenda. Soon, he'll be the only one editing the article. Fait accompli? Rikstar (talk) 06:35, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

 * In response to the recent comments made by user:141 dated 13th December 2007. Taken from Peter Guralnick,Last Train to Memphis. p 415. These are just a few more sentences that follow after what 141 quoted in that same paragraph.  It reads: - the companionship seemed as important for him as the sex- and then in the early-morning hours they would make love. "He had an innocence at the time," said one of them. "I'm sure it didn't last.

 * Why did you leave this out? Does this not pertain to the text? Jaye9 19 December 2007  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.142.39.219 (talk) 13:41, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

 * Interesting. Perhaps there's a need to check all of 141s sources for selective reference. Perhaps there is also a need to evaluate the appropriateness of 141 continuing to edit this article.  Lara  ❤  Love  15:06, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

 * The Guralnick quote goes on: "But what he really wanted was to have a relationship, to have company. He was very clean-cut about it. There were a lot of things that he didn't like. And another thing that you could not do around him was mention drugs, he was dead set against it." etc. etc. That Elvis primarily wanted to have company, also male company, and not sex with girls, is also backed up by what is written directly before the passage on the girls in Guralnick's book. It is mentioned that Elvis apparently "loved the entourage" and that they went out to Russ Tamblyn's "beach house one or two more times" [i.e., a small, one-bedroom beach house on the Pacific Coast Highway just south of Topanga Canyon, where Elvis came with his friend Nick Adams, all of his cousins, hangers-on and some girls, etc.; see p. 410]. Elvis even asked if he could rent that house "for the next couple of months." Last year, I included a longer quote from Guralnick on my user page explaining why it isn't necessary to cite the whole passage. See . If you would like to see a longer quote from Guralnick in the Elvis article, I have no problems with this. However, it is a fact that modern researchers question whether Elvis had actually sex with most of these girls. Even the Memphis Mafia members were not sure what was going on behind closed doors. Therefore, eyewitness accounts by women who say that they didn't make love are so important. Some users may remember that last year I even included the following passage at the beginning of the section (see, ):
 * Several authors have written that "Elvis busied his evenings with various girlfriends" or that his "list of one-night stands would fill volumes." According to eyewitness Byron Raphael, who worked for Presley's manager Parker, the star even had a secret one-night stand with Marilyn Monroe in a hotel room.
 * I did this for reasons of balance. This passage was later abridged by Rikstar in order to shorten the section, as we have, on the other hand, the many eyewitness accounts by former girlfriends (and other women the star dated) that they didn't have sex with Elvis. A longer version of the paragraph once read:
 * However, it is unclear whether the "sex symbol" actually had sex with most of the women he dated. His early girlfriends Judy Spreckels and June Juanico say that they had no sexual relationships with Presley. Raphael and Alanna Nash have stated that the star "would never put himself inside one of these girls..." During his military service, he had "discovered prostitutes and picked up the intense fear of sexually transmitted diseases which led to claims that he had a morbid fear of sexual penetration." Because of his shyness, Albert Goldman says, "no woman ever saw Elvis undressed." June Juanico "recalls a time when she stood up to Elvis in front of his band of hangers-on, who even then were beginning to accompany him everywhere. He grabbed her arm, took her into the bathroom and declared: 'Look, you are so right, I am really sorry.' He kept her there for five minutes, then swaggered out, his image intact." Julie Parrish, Presley's co-star in Paradise Hawaiian Style, relates, "One time on set I had a real pain in my side - a side-effect, I think - and Elvis scooped me up, carried me into his trailer and shut the door. Outside the crew was waiting and wondering, but Elvis was oblivious to the innuendo. He placed his hand over my side and tried to do some healing on me." ... Playboy star and actress June Wilkinson remembered that she "met Elvis on the set of King Creole. He invited me to dinner at the Beverly Wilshire Hotel. ... Then Elvis gave me a tour of his suite, sat me on the bed in his bedroom and sang to me for two hours. That was it. The next day ... we had dinner again. He was very sweet, and he was friendly. He had more than sex on his mind. He got me to the airport on time, and our paths never crossed again." etc. etc.
 * Furthermore, we may also add that, according to Albert Goldman, Elvis was "a pervert" and "a voyeur," who often refrained from intercourse with the women who came to his bedroom. The author also sees a "decline into infantilism." Even when Elvis did "have intercourse with an unfamiliar woman, he would never allow himself to ejaculate inside her." According to Alanna Nash, Elvis had gone impotent in his final years, due at least in part to extremely massive intake of narcotics, both uppers and downers. Nash also emphasizes that Elvis was overly attached to his mother and could not relate normally to mature women; that's why he sought out very young girls because he felt threatened by women his own age. In similar terms, Memphis Mafia members such as Joe Esposito not only report a "boyish charm" in him, but also "voyeuristic tendencies," a "full-blown Madonna complex" and drug-induced impotence in his decline. See Joe Esposito and Elena Oumano, Good Rockin' Tonight: Twenty Years on the Road and on the Town With Elvis (1994). By the way, it is also a fact that Elvis spent most of his time with the guys from the Memphis Mafia, not with girls. And he preferred to hide when he wasn't performing. Esposito recalled leaving Presley's Vegas suite to play poker in the wee hours of the morning: "We had a lot of people up there all the time. We had 15, 30, 50 people a night up in the suite. But it was hard for him, because when he was in town people were always looking for him. But the thing about it, see, we used to go down at 4, 5 in the morning just to play cards a little bit in the casino when it wasn't as crowded. But then all of a sudden it got crowded, bothered him, we had to back upstairs." For reasons of balance, all this well-sourced information may also be included in the article, if you would prefer that. On the other hand, is it really necessary to include all this stuff? I don't think so. As I already recommended on my user page, it may be a good idea to mention that Guralnick writes that for "the more experienced girls it wasn't like with other Hollywood stars or even with other more sophisticated boys they knew." Although they offered to do things for Presley, "he wasn't really interested." He preferred to lie in bed, watch television and talk (and to play cards with his guys). This or a similar statement is a good summary of Elvis's attitudes toward girls, and in the Wikipedia article we don't need to go into all details mentioned by Guralnick. Onefortyone (talk) 20:16, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

 * It pains me to see what one user, 141, has done to this article. I watched many others work very hard on getting it to FA status. Maria202 (talk) 15:34, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
 * The only problem is that some Elvis fans endeavor to remove sourced material they do not like from the article . Onefortyone (talk) 20:32, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

ArbCom talk
OK. So we are all belly aching about 141. There seems to be no alternative to involving the Arbcom. I was about ready to do this when Lara stepped in, and I backed off. At least one other editor was with me on this at that time.

 * Who is ready to go to the Arbcom?

The form that has to be filled out is a bit daunting, probably by design, but the only way this is going to work is if we bite the bullet. Many of us have spent WAY too much unproductive time on this.

Please leave a simple message on this page. Please do not equivocate. I'm looking for a YES or NO. I'm guessing that this will be best received if we do it above board and out in the open. Steve Pastor (talk) 16:42, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

 * Just a short note. We already had three arbcom cases concerning the Elvis article because my former opponent, Elvis fan Ted Wilkes alias multiple hardbanned User:DW took me to arbitration two or three years ago simply because my contributions were not in line with his personal view and he wanted to harass me. However, my opponents were later banned from the article. The arbcom says that "Onefortyone's editing has substantially improved from that in the earlier arbitration cases. A sampling of edits shows reference to reliable sources without overstating of their content. To a greater extent he allows the reader to draw their own conclusions." See . This is a clear statement. Onefortyone (talk) 20:32, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Yep, and the same link contains other clear, but critical, statements about 141's editing tactics. Some things have not improved. Rikstar (talk) 04:46, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * What things do you think have not improved? As far as I can see, I am always citing my sources. Furthermore, you have confirmed above that I have "the resources, intelligence and communication skills to help make this an excellent featured article." Onefortyone (talk) 20:51, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

 * Yep, and 141 also has "the resources, intelligence and communication skills" to stifle healthy debate and kill this article and its talk stone dead (For god's sake, I pay 141 a compliment, a gesture of goodwill, and he even uses that as a stick to beat his opponents with...) There have been numerous examples of 141 refusing to accept edits he personally disagrees with, pushing specific agendas, ignoring consensus... oh, I'm sorry, I am repeating myself, something else that always seems to happen when dealing with 141's tedious arguments. This article is going nowhere; few if any want to get involved with 141, and relative newcomers, openminded to the possibility of working usefully with 141, are now realizing how futile it is. And 141 will probably believe that this is everyone else's fault, and that he is entirely blameless because... he "is always citing his sources"!! I emphasize: there is a real possibility that 141 will, by undermining all opponents, stealthily get his skewed content inserted bit by bit. This is already happening; editors have given up removing stuff he wants in, resulting in e.g. a brief Ed Sullivan section that perplexingly mentions "ice cream", "pasha" and "harem girl". What does that inform readers about the Sullivan appearance?? It reads like a bunch of crap ('scuse my mouth). Like many other dubious bits, if it is changed or removed yet again with the blessing of a consensus in the name of improvement, you can bet 141 will change it back. I've not come across any user who edits in such a disruptive and subversive manner. It's time 141 left the building. Rikstar (talk) 23:41, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Sorry, Rikstar, did you realize that I have accepted many of your edits, as they are indeed improvements? What I am criticizing is that you and a few Elvis fans are frequently removing sourced content from the Elvis article. Time and again I have argued on the talk page why I find this material relevant. I have also tried to rewrite some passages in order to shorten the article. Notwithstanding, the abridged material also gets removed. Significantly, you are the person who says that what Elvis experts such as Greil Marcus have written in an essay directly related to the topic is "skewed content" and "reads like a bunch of crap" (see above), simply because you and Steve Pastor do not like the information that Ed Sullivan had "censored" or even "buried" the singer, as Elvis was only shown from the waist up and "stepped out in the outlandish costume of a pasha, if not a harem girl" during the Sullivan Show. It should be noted that I do not remove sourced paragraphs written by others. Only Elvis fans have the audacity to do so. Steve Pastor frequently wants to get rid of some information he doesn't like. For instance, he asked, "Do we really need to know that Elvis and his mother 'slept in the same bed up until Elvis was a young teen?' " See . Rodhullandemu answered, "Why not? If it illustrates the poverty of his early life and is properly sourced, what is the problem? It would have been fairly common for family members in the southern states to share sleeping arrangements at that time..." See . Relating to the content dispute, Egghead06 said, "To attempt to compromise, this article needs to show both sides with suitable references and let the reader decide." See . This means that I am not the only one who thinks that specific information concerning Elvis's life should not be removed. And now Steve Pastor wants to take the content dispute a fourth time to arbcom? The arbcom members have certainly more important things to do and you should not waste their valuable time. As for the frequent removals, Professor Wall may be right with his opinions concerning the activities of the world-wide Elvis industry. Onefortyone (talk) 04:57, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Sorry, 141 is being disingenuous again. Time and again on this talk page others have argued why some of 141's edits should be removed - and he just goes ahead and ignores the consensus. 141 accuses me and others of wanting to remove material because we simply don't like it (because it's critical). How many more times have I to state that there are perfectly acceptable reasons for removing or rewriting material, however well-sourced it is? How many more times have I to state that I think the Marcus quote referring to ice cream, etc, is just a bad read that will beg more questions than it answers when the unintiated read it?? How many? Only 141 has the audacity to ignore a consensus of opinion and keep reinstating unsuitable material. I rewrote the Sullivan section after informing others of my intentions to make it read better, and 141 just changed it back, time and again. "I do not removed sourced paragraphs" proclaims 141, as if removing such material has always been done by others for the wrong reasons. Just another contemptible accusation that I find offensive, and 141 wants us all to hold hands and just forget about his history of disruption and get on with editing the Early years section? Sorry, 141 has left a very bad taste in my mouth. Just look how far this article hasn't progressed - because no one wants to work with one user. If arbcom members have more important things to do than address this issue, I'd like to know what they are. User Northmeister was one of only a few substantial contributors to this article, and he stopped because of 141's tiresome antics and accusations. What a pathetic and lamentable state of affairs. Rikstar (talk) 19:47, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Does this mean that you don't want to get on with editing the "Early years" section? Be that as it may, I do want to get on with the section and have now included the 4th draft with some minor changes in the article. As for the Sullivan passages, the chronology of inclusion may be of some interest. On May 18, 2007, I cited the main parts of an essay by reputed Elvis expert Greil Marcus on Elvis's Ed Sullivan appearances on the talk page in order to discuss its content. See . You said, "This is interesting stuff and I've got more like it on my book shelves," and you wondered what might be significant for inclusion in the article. See . Later, a well-sourced paragraph I had included in the article was repeatedly removed by Northmeister, Steve Pastor and Rikstar. I did not understand why. However, as I was willing to compromise, I tried my best to write shorter versions, and at last, only these few quotes from Marcus remained in the version I prefer: " 'Compared to moments on the Dorsey shows and on the Berle show, it was ice cream.' ... The fact that Presley was only shown from the waist up and 'stepped out in the outlandish costume of a pasha, if not a harem girl' during this last broadcast has led to claims that Sullivan had 'censored' or even 'buried' the singer ..." See . To my mind, these are important remarks by an expert on rock 'n' roll music, as it is clearly shown that Elvis's Sullivan appearances differ from the more lively ones on the Dorsey shows and that Elvis was censored. As for the lamentable state of affairs, did you mention that GiantSpitoon, a supposed sockpuppet of my old opponent, user Joey Joe Joe Junior Shabadoo has removed, as usual, a well-sourced paragraph from the Sex symbol section and started the unnecessary discussion above? Recently, even the entire section has been removed by Hoserjoe. See . But it has been reinstated by LaraLove. See . So much for the disruptive behavior of supposed sockpuppets. See also . By the way, you, Rikstar, included this abridged version of the said section in the Elvis article, and I didn't reinstate the longer version written by me. So much for the claims that I am not willing to compromise. Onefortyone (talk) 06:02, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Just because you can trumpet the odd occasion when you have not done something that might annoy other editors does not negate how disruptive I and others have found your general contributions. The pasha-ice cream-harem girl stuff is a clumsy, confusing read. You said it, your contribution was judged unfit by a consensus of others so you just shortened it, leaving the confusing and obscure Marcus terms. You persistently refused to accept the wishes of a majority who liked neither your long or your shorter version of Marcus' personal comments. We have as usual discussed this issue ad nauseum, and all we have is a sub-standard edit to show for it. Rikstar (talk) 12:59, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Could it be that you and Steve Pastor simply do not like the terms used by reputed rock 'n' roll and Elvis expert, Greil Marcus, even if they are cited in a very abridged form, because they all too clearly show that Elvis was indeed censored and buried by Sullivan, at a time when Presley's music was not generally accepted? Onefortyone (talk) 03:52, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

 * Not in my case anyway. You're back to your old "you're just a biased Elvis fan" argument again. Been there before, dealt with it before... Rikstar (talk) 20:17, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
 * This article has been degraded enough. Too much time and hard work has gone to waste. This article has great potential to be an FA. Currently, it can't even keep GA. It's time to fix the issues that ail this article.  Lara  ❤  Love  17:14, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

 * There is another problem. Am I right that a featured article should not be protected? However, if the article is unprotected, many vandals will, as usual, reappear. See, for instance,, , , , , etc. How can this be handled? This is not unimportant. Onefortyone (talk) 20:42, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
 * WP:NOPRO only applies to the main page FA, which is so heavily watched that any vandalism it takes while featured is quickly reverted.  Lara  ❤  Love  03:57, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

I'm with you Steve Pastor, Maria, LaraLove and anyone else of similar opinion. Rikstar (talk) 22:12, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

New perspective
I recently wrote a comment on the 18th November 2007 re: Peter Gurlanick. I have now signed in. However I am still on my learners plates,so please bear with me. In saying that,you all seem very nice and understanding group of people. So here we go! 141, in part of you text earlier in the piece, you mention For reasons of balance, all this is welled sourced information may also be included in the article,if you would prefer that. On the other hand, is it really necessary to include all this stuff? I don't think so.

 * Most of the article is simply an exercise in editorial vanity by a few (one in particular) self-centred and obsessive editors. The result is a very low quality Wikipedia article (as you can see from the broken-quality logo at the top of this Talk Page), certainly one of the worst focused on a historical person.  75% of it could be removed with no consequence except a vast improvement in encyclopedic usefulness. Hoserjoe (talk) 08:14, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

141, I think to be fair to the subject (Elvis Presley), the author involved in the text, the other editors and the readers themselves, yes, I think it is very important for the article to be balanced. --Jaye9 (talk) 13:02, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

User: Mfbinc mentions a few ladies stating they had a relationship with Elvis, to conteract the claims made by 141. 141 requests for sources to back these claims. He then mentions a book by Tom Weaver, I Was A Monster Movie Maker: Conversations with 22 SF and Horror Filmakers (2001),stating the book didn't mention Elvis and Anne Helm having an affair. Anne Helm, to my knowledge has not done many interviews about Elvis. She did however give an interview regarding her relationship with Elvis to authors Brown & Broeske, Down At The End OF Lonely Street P. 242-44,449. Due to the fact that there are three pages on her,I'll only include the "Humpy Bumpy" bits,okay. Anne Helme states it is to ignore his physical allure--the hair that was dark blond again,the deep olive tan. But stressed Helm,his appeal was more than physical. "He was so very,very sweet. I think a lot of women reached out to him because they felt he was lonely. I actually wrote some poetry about him when we were making the movie. It was that kind of romance." It was also very physical. "He really liked sex. A lot of nights I didn't go back to my own bungalow. I felt a little ashamed about it the next morning,because I knew that the people on the set realized what was going on." But Helm added,"I have to tell you,I had fun. And it was special. Two paragraphs along- "They sometimes played cards into the early-morning hours,when Presley would ask her to slip into a flouncy,yellow baby-doll nightie he had bought her. "I wasn't crazy about them,but he just loved them,Helm said,laughing. After they made love,he would give her pills-Jaye9 (talk) 14:25, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you Jaye9, your comments and citations are very welcome. Please make sure the quotes from others you give are very clear i.e. in quotation marks, to keep them separate from your own comments. Please also state in detail the source of your quotes. Your contributions could prove very useful in improving this article. Rikstar (talk) 21:50, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Rikstar,your comments and advise were both usefull and encouraging to me,thank you.--Jaye9 (talk) 01:00, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your comments. Though it is very funny that a new user's first three contributions to Wikipedia are related to a specific discussion topic on Talk:Elvis Presley concerning Elvis's relationships with women, I would also recommend including the material in the Elvis article in an abridged form, provided that it is accurately cited. The source seems to be reliable and it supports the view that Elvis sometimes had sex with a girl. However, the passage is not yet accurately cited. That Elvis was very sweet, that several women felt he was lonely, that they seem to have had a lot of fun playing cards early in the morning etc. is in line with other sources. That Elvis was crazy about baby-doll nighties certainly underscores the singer's "decline into infantilism" (Goldman). Onefortyone (talk) 03:20, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Onefortyone, when you say funny, do you mean funny ha ha or funny parculiar? What can I say, only that my genuine reasons for being here, is to try and help were I can and to make this article as fair and as accurate as humanly possible. On that note, I wish you and yours a very merry christmas and that we can endeavour to have a cival and productive discussion re: this article, in the new year.--Jaye9 (talk) 09:14, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

 * Just a thought but has anyone noticed how much of this controversy relates to Elvis' sexuality? I appreciate that it is some modern phenomenon as to the fascination concerning what people do with their genitals but, if so, why not hive it off to another article 'Elvis Sexuality'? There seems to be little doubt as to his place/date of birth, his music, his films, even his death - just what used to float his boat. This would not only free up this article but give a new life to those interested in his libido rather than that which made the man notable.--Egghead06 (talk) 16:47, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
 * If you've been around this article for a while, the situation can be summed up as 141. We are hoping to change that, but it will take time. Meanwhile, 141 has a number of ways to deflect the efforts of other editors. You could try making changes yourself to see what happens. Most people give up after a relatively short time, and find something more productive to do. Steve Pastor (talk) 17:47, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Making changes to 'see what happens' is exactly my idea of fun so will be leaving that to those who know something of his sexual proclivity (or care)!--Egghead06 (talk) 18:56, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I also do not understand why so much of the current controversy relates to Elvis's sexuality. This is the more surprising as the shortest sections of the entire article deal with Elvis as a sex symbol and with his wife and daughter. I did not start this discussion. It was GiantSpitoon who repeatedly removed half of the "Sex symbol" section. Before these removals, we were talking about the 4th draft of the first section of the article and not about the "Sex symbol" section. See . Onefortyone (talk) 22:49, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
 * So much of the "current controversy" occurs because one particular user (guess) keeps trying to own this article, and the Talk Page. I'm in favor of taking it to arbitration, or even having him banned for his behavior in and about this article and Talk.  It's a shame that this user  has made such a mess of this page with his obsessive blather that the page is sinking into a swamp of user despair. Hoserjoe (talk) 00:22, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Despair is right. I cannot believe 141 is trying to distance himself from the sex content in this article and the talk pages, when he has been uniquely instrumental in making accusations regarding Presley's sexuality over a long period, covering everything from Elvis having a blow job, through sex with Nick Adams to claims of gay lyrics in many of Presley's hits and that Elvis had sex with his own mother. No one else has persisted with such a ludicrous and disturbing agenda, and I doubt few who know 141 have any faith that 141 will not return to such matters. It does not matter how little these claims are referred to in the current article; it's how many hours have been wasted having to respond to 141 to keep his tiresome unilateral claims out. This is the despair; the realization that 141 will clog up these pages whenever he chooses, with whatever material he chooses, however inappropriate it may be deemed by a consensus of others. As for 141's claim that "it is very funny that a new user's [Jaye9] first three contributions to Wikipedia are related to a specific discussion topic on Talk:Elvis Presley concerning Elvis's relationships with women", why is 141's paranoia at such a level that he has to assume so much bad faith on the part of a new contributor??? This is not nearly as offensive as it is unsettling and disturbing, and it's very offensive anyway. READ MY LIPS: 141 is killing this article. Rikstar (talk), 19:47, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Sorry, Rikstar, you are here talking about a discussion that is more than four months old. As there was no consensus of opinion to add a short, well-sourced note concerning Elvis's possible bisexuality, I didn't include the material in the article, although, from time to time, there are inquiries about the topic. See . So much for the false claim that I have "persisted with such a ludicrous and disturbing agenda" (your words). As for my "paranoia" that I have "to assume so much bad faith on the part of a new contributor", you may remember that I am frequently harassed by new sockpuppets of old opponents. See . However, you may have noticed that I did accept the contributions by Jaye9, as this user seems to have cited a reliable source. By the way, may I remind you of your handling of a request by another user who wished to include more facts about Elvis's father and stepmother in the article? In response, you rejected this legitimate request out of hand, arguing, without giving any reasons, that Elvis's songwriters deserve more of a mention than his stepmother. Interestingly, Steve Pastor also chimed in with, "there is much that has to be left out," although Elvis's problems with his stepmother are not unimportant, as they deeply affected the singer's personal life at Graceland. See . Onefortyone (talk) 06:16, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
 * So, you didn't include stuff on his sexuality; that's because other users spent a disproportionate number of hours challenging your agenda. I personally found it tedious and time-consuming to the point of almost ending my involvement. It is rich of you to try and criticize my handling of issues on this talk page. I and others have been running round in circles wondering how to handle your involvement; we've tried responding in detail to the great wads of text you post, we've ignored your comments when they have been repetitive or not worthy of comment e.g. making the "it's well-sourced so shouldn't be removed" argument. I've realized how frustrating it is to NOT respond to you because it appears to lend undue credence to your comments. Olive branches have been extended to you (even a barnstar, from Northmeister) just to keep this damned thing going 'cos you're around. And yet perhaps on occasion, a user pushed beyond reasonable endurance will make a brief, curt dismissal of someting on these talk pages, and you want to slap a user's wrist for it? Please note "Elvis's songwriters deserve more of a mention than his stepmother" is a reason for not including details of his stepmother. You may not agree with it, but don't accuse me of not giving any reason in that particular case. Why you appear to criticize Steve Pastor, for simply agreeing with me and stating that the article can't contain details on everyone, is beyond me.
 * Sorry, Rikstar, you have not yet explained why Elvis's songwriters should deserve more priority than his stepmother in a biographical article on the star. Onefortyone (talk) 04:08, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Go ahead and finish the Early years section on these pages, wait for comments/approval from all those clamoring to join you in improving this article and, if I have the stomach for it, I may look at it. But do not interpret my reluctance to work with you as being a petulant rebuttal of your polite request; it is a reluctance to work with someone whose editing and talk comments have driven me beyond endurance. And I am not the only one. Rikstar (talk) 12:59, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Rikstar, I have been observing this article for six months now, and I would read your contributions, comments and your frustrations on trying to make this a good article, and sometimes you would talk about possibly leaving and I would say to myself please don't. You have shown to be articulate and balanced in your views, this is part of the reasons why I'm here. I have taken your advise about your suggestion for users to read 141's editing history for the past three years. Please excuse my tone, but I have just recently had endure this tripe for two hours. Is it against Wikipedia's policy for an editor to use selective referencing?, if that's the case, it's FULL OF IT. Do you have a copy of Peter Gurlanick's two volummes Last Train To Memphis & Careless Love? He is as I'm sure you would agree the definative biographer of Elvis Presley, even Onefortyone couldn't dispute that fact. If you do have these copies, have a look at the names listed, who he interviewed, but in 141's case, who he didn't. There is no mention of Dee Stanley, or gossip columnist William Dakota or Earl Greenwood for that matter. I wonder why?

To Steve Pastor add me to your list, please.--Jaye9 (talk) 15:04, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
 * You should stick close to the facts, Jaye9. Peter Guralnick indeed cites the books by Earl Greenwood and Dee Presley (Stanley) in his Elvis biography, Last Train to Memphis. See and  . Onefortyone (talk) 03:41, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I have just read some old talk pages to help Steve P. and his arbcom. I found it shocking and depressing to see how much 141 has tied up the time and patience of well meaning users for over 18 months with his material and comments. I had to stop reading. If you have any evidence of selective referencing, please post specific examples here. I only have volume two. I really am having to fight hard to maintain interest in this project, and I am very grateful for the support you and others have shown in having me on board. Rikstar (talk) 17:30, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
 * What is missing in your last edits is a substantial discussion concerning the content of the Elvis article and based on reliable sources. All I can see are accusations and attacks against me. One thing is clear: what stands me out from the other users (mostly Elvis fans together with some new sockpuppets of former opponents), who now join forces against me simply because my edits are not in line with their personal opinion, is that I am the only editor who frequently cites his sources, among them mainstream Elvis biographies, essays by reputed Elvis experts, books by people who knew Elvis and peer-reviewed studies published by university presses. This is fully in line with Wikipedia policy. Most other editors interested in the Elvis article do not cite books on Elvis or university studies on the rock 'n' roll era. For instance, Steve Pastor's only sources seem to be some DVDs. All what my opponents can do is to delete sourced material. It's a real pity. Onefortyone (talk) 03:41, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Perhaps the issue is not about the sources being used, but the selective nature in which information is being pulled from the sources and presented in the article.  Lara  ❤  Love  05:14, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
 * You could also say, perhaps the issue is not so much about the sources being used, but the selective nature in which well-sourced information is being removed from the article, simply because it is not in line with the opinion of some fans. For instance, a third-party user has called Hoserjoe's removals "whitewashing edits which remove much sourced content" and his edits were therefore repeatedly reverted. See, , . Onefortyone (talk) 05:42, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Right. We know there is an issue with Hoserjoe and his alt account(s), but that's not the focus of discussion. We're talking about the possibility of information being selectively pulled from sources in order to skew the information to one's own desired point of view. There is also an issue of deciding just what and how much is relevant for inclusion in this article.  Lara  ❤  Love  06:18, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Last Train To Memphis by Peter Gurlanick. Bibliography - Presley,Dee,Billy Stanley,Rick Stanley, and David Stanley. Elvis We Love You Tender. Greenwood,Earl. The Boy Who Would Be King Index Earl Greenwood - no mention; Dee Presley - no mention Acknowledgements Earl Greenwood - no mention; Dee Presley - no mention

Careless Love by Peter Gurlanick. Bibliography- Presley,Dee,Billy Smith,Rick Stanley,and David Stanley. Elvis We Love You Tender. Greenwood,Earl. The Boy Who Would Be King Index Presley,Dee Stanley(stepmother),14,16-17,31,42,46,56-57,58,Graceland,35-36,64,77-78,80,89,93,117. Earl Greenwood - no mention Acknowledgements Earl Greenwood - no mention; Dee Stanley - no mention--Jaye9 (talk) 18:41, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

141, when I discussed Peter Gurlanick to Rikstar, I said he did not interview the likes of Gossip Columnist Bill Dakota, Earl Greenwood, or Dee Stanley, that is all that I stated, and that is a FACT. Dee Stanley was certainly in Elvis Presley life, she was married to his father. In all the pages cited in Careless Love, which by the way was first published in 1999, he never once discusses Dee Stanley's outrageous allegations, which she bought to light back well before "Careless Love" was ever published. Why is it that you seem to be so fixated on these types of topics, or even think they are worth mentioning. Obviously Peter Gurlanick did't seem to think so, otherwise he would have put it in.

 * I am not so fixated on these types of topics, as you claim. For more than a year now, there is no information about "Dee Stanley's outrageous allegations" in the Elvis article, though her claims are also mentioned by reputed Elvis expert, Greil Marcus, in his book, Double Trouble: Bill Clinton and Elvis Presley in a Land of No Alternatives (2001). By the way, thanks for admitting that Peter Guralnick has indeed used material written by Earl Greenwood and Dee Presley for his Elvis biography, as he has cited their books in the bibliographies to his two volumes. For a biographer, it is not necessary to interview anyone who has written books on Elvis, and there are many more contemporaries of Elvis whom the author didn't contact personally. Onefortyone (talk) 01:10, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Oh by the way 141, I am an Elvis Fan and a John Lennon fan, as well as many other artist, but don't worry I'm taking medication for it.--Jaye9 (talk) 19:09, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

User: Onefortyone 5 September 2007 (Talk),titled "Elvis and Marilyn Monroe",writes: The members of the Memphis Mafia certainly did not know every secret about Elvis. His early girlfriend Judy Spreckles says that the singer told her secrets "that I never told and will never tell." Robert L. Levinson's book,The Elvis and Marilyn Affair (1999) deals with a batch of love letters allegedley exchanged between Elvis and Marilyn Monroe during the filming of Love Me Tender and with a secret affair on the Fox lot in 1956 between Elvis and Marilyn. Though the story is fictitious,the author may have had some information about what was going on behind closed doors.--Jaye9 (talk) 04:28, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

What do we have here? Let's try to decipher this text,shall we. Point one: "The members of the Memphis Mafia certainly did not know every secret about Elvis". My response: True, that's a fair enough statement. Point two: "His girlfriend Judy Spreckles says that the singer told her secrets that I never told and will never tell." My response: What do those secrets intail?,do you know 141?,I certainly don't. Point three: "Robert L. Levinson's fiction book on The Elvis and Marilyn Affair (1999)". My response: Simply,pure fiction. Point four: "The Author may have had some information about what was going on behind closed doors". My response: We'll never know. 141,is this your idea of research? your personal opinion,thrown in with a bit of imagination. Yet, you recently criticize user: Steve Pastor, for using DVD'S (film footage)as his method of research. It is my contention,that not only books,but DVD'S and recordings are an important part of that research. I am certainly questioning this one example of what you call research. Yet this rumor,taken from your original source in the main article,"Byron Raphel wtih Alana Nash,"In Bed with Elvis" Playboy Novemver 2005 Vol 52,Iss. 11,p64-68,76,140. This is your only source by the way, makes we wonder how this could happen. 141,is this truly your idea of a compromise?--Jaye9 (talk) 05:52, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

 * What are you talking about? According to eyewitness Byron Raphael, who worked for Presley's manager, Colonel Parker, Elvis had a secret one-night stand with Marilyn Monroe in a hotel room. This was reported not only by the Playboy article of 2005, but also by many newspapers in October 2006. See, for example, New York Post, October 1, 2006; Daily Mail, October 4, 2006. However, this passage was later removed by Rikstar in order to shorten the text of the Elvis article, and I accepted this edit by way of compromising. Onefortyone (talk) 00:50, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

User:141 Writes NB: This is undoubtedly a source from Elvis's lifetime. By the way,the Guardian Article also proves(as many sources do)that Vernon & Dee Presley had indeed been living together with Priscilla and Elvis for a considerable period of time at Graceland. You should stick close to the facts to be found in published sources,Lockdale insted of making false accusations against other contributors. Talk:Elvis Presley/Archives:15. July 2006-December 2006?.--Jaye9 (talk) 04:12, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Vernon was often at Graceland,but since his marriage on July 3,1960,he lived in a house near Graceland with Dee and her three boys. Taken from: Joe Esposito and Elena Oumano,"Good Rockin'Tonight. p.56--Jaye9 (talk) 04:33, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

"It was not until 1963,when Priscilla turned seveenteen,that her father allowed her to live in Memphis". (skipped four sentences) At first,she did stay at Vernon's to keep her promise to her parents. But Priscilla spent most of her time with Elvis,and before you knew it,she was permanently installed at Graceland. (skipped two sentences to finish paragraph. Taken from: Joe Esposito and Elena Oumano book 'Good Rockin'Tonight". p.96--Jaye9 (talk) 05:30, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

 * Jaye9, thank you so much for the information you are posting. It could prove invaluable in solving the problems with improving this article. I hope to have more time eventually to see how/if we can use your information, should the current problems continue. Your efforts are very much appreciated. Thank you - again. You are renewing my faith in wikipedia editing! Rikstar (talk) 15:32, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

I don't understand why you are citing this material from an old discussion of 2006 with my former opponent Lochdale, Jaye9. Are you interested to include some information on the problems Elvis had with his stepmother, Dee Presley, at Graceland in the Elvis article? This would make sense, as another user has also requested to include some material on Dee Presley in the article. See. For the record, on July 3, 1960, Vernon Presley married Dee Stanley. They indeed lived at Graceland for a period of time before moving to a house nearby. So much for your false claim about Vernon above that "since his marriage on July 3,1960,he lived in a house near Graceland with Dee and her three boys." The Guardian (or, to be more precisely, its Sunday edition, the Observer) you have mentioned above clearly says that Elvis "brought Priscilla back to the States to live at Graceland, ostensibly under the chaperoning protection of his father Vernon and his new wife Dee." See. Here are some further sources:
 * According to Conny Kirchberg and Marc Hendrickx, Elvis Presley, Richard Nixon, and the American Dream (1999), p.63, Vernon helped Dee "secure a divorce so that she could join him in Memphis after Elvis's discharge. The couple would officially tie the knot on July 2, 1960. The Stanley's three sons, David, Rick, and Billy (ages four, six and seven), who had been sent to a boarding school in the States while Dee's romance was in progress, moved into Graceland that summer and began calling Vernon 'Daddy.' ... Presley, meanwhile, went into a state of shock from which he never fully recovered. Two years had not yet passed since his beloved mother's death and already his father had replaced her with another woman, a woman he had stolen from another man, a woman with three young sons, all of whom considered Elvis their new big brother."
 * In his book, Careless Love: The Unmaking of Elvis Presley (1999), p. 77, Peter Guralnick writes that "Vernon and Dee got married that Sunday, July 3. The following day Elvis went to the cemetery on his motorcycle and was almost run down by a girl who spotted him kneeling by his mother's grave in prayer. ... Vernon and Dee came home from their honeymoon and moved into Graceland with her three kids. He [Elvis] continued to speak well of Dee for public consumption. 'She seems to be a pretty nice, understanding type of person,' he had said when news of the marriage first began to leak out. 'She treats me with respect, just as she does Daddy. She realizes she could never be my mother. I only had one mother and that's it.' "

 * In his study, Hero Myths: A Reader (2000), Robert Segal says on p.213: "Soon after Dee Presley became part of the family, Elvis showed her a picture of Priscilla, commenting that Priscilla was special to him."

 * According to Dafydd Rees and Luke Crampton, ''Rock Movers & Shakers" (1991), p.403, " Priscilla Beaulieu returns to Memphis to stay at Graceland with Vernon and Dee Presley."
 * According to Larry Geller and Joel Spector, If I Can Dream: Elvis' Own Story (1989), p.58, "Probably the most scandalous rumor circulating then was that Elvis kept a young girl [Priscilla] back at Graceland. ... As Vernon and Elvis promised Mr. and Mrs. Beaulieu, she did complete her schooling and, as far as the public knew, lived with Vernon, Dee and Dee's three little boys, Rick, David and Billy Stanley..."

Interestingly, in July 2006, my former opponent Lochdale, who was later banned from Elvis Presley by arbcom decision, included the same false claim that Elvis's stepmother Dee Presley never lived with the star at Graceland in the Elvis article. See. What a coincidence! Onefortyone (talk) 00:25, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
 * In Elvis and Gladys (2004), Elaine Dundy writes, p.329-330, "that Vernon had settled down with Dee where Gladys had once reigned, while Dee herself - when Elvis was away - had taken over the role of mistress of Graceland so thoroughly as to rearrange the furniture and replace the very curtains that Gladys had approved of." This was too much for the singer who still loved his deceased mother. One afternoon, "a van arrived from Goldsmith's department store, accompanied by one of the decorating assistants, Don Johnson, and all Dee's household's goods, clothes, 'improvements,' and her own menagerie of pets, were loaded on – 'We stuffed cats into that van for fifteen minutes!' recalls Don - while Vernon, Dee and her three children went by car to a nearby house on Hermitage until they finally settled into a house on Dolan Drive which ran alongside Elvis's estate. 'He didn't seem like Elvis ever again,' Lillian had said from her vantage point. But on the surface he remained precisely the same - as though in maintaining the status quo he could still keep Gladys alive."

--Jaye9 (talk) 11:48, 9 January 2008 (UTC)Please allow me to respond to your text above,but most importantly,pointing out to you what this was all about in the first place,which I will text in bold futher on. Point One: "I don't understand why you are citing this material from an old discussion of 2006 with my former opponent Lockdale,Jaye9"(part of text)signed:Onefortyone(talk)8 January 2008. Response: "If you have any evidence of selective referencing please post specific examples here". (part of text)signed:Rikstar(talk)30 December 2007.

Point two: user 141 writes: "By the way,the Guardian Article also proves(as many sources do)that Vernon & Dee Presley had indeed been living together with Priscilla and Elvis for a considerable period of time at Graceland". (part of text) Talk:Elvis Presley/Archives 15 July 2006-December 2006? Response: False and misleading. Point three: "Vernon was at Graceland,but since his marraige on July3,1960,he lived in a home near Graceland with Dee and there three boys". Joe Esposito and Elena Oumano,"Good Rockin'Tonight. p.56 Response: To vague,needed more clarification,so I continued with further referenceing from Joe Esposito's book being: "It was not until 1963,when Priscilla turned seveenteen,that her father allowed her to live in Memphis".(skipped four sentences) At first,she did stay at Vernon's to keep her promise to her parents. But Priscilla spent most of her time with Elvis,and before you knew it,she was permanently installed at Graceland".(skipped two sentences to finish paragraph) Taken from:Joe Esposito and Elena Oumano book Good Rockin'Tonight. p.96 signed;Jaye9(talk) 7 January 2008--Jaye9 (talk) 12:33, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Point four: User:141 writes; "Interestingly,in July 2006,my former opponent Lockdale,who was latter banned from (Elvis Presley)by arbcom decision,included the same false claim that Elvis's stepmother Dee Presley never lived with the star at Graceland in the Elvis article. See[50] What a coincidence!" signed:Onefortyone(talk) 8 January 2008 Response: Firstly,allow me to apologize,for not been able to text(point four)in it's correct format with the wording (Elvis Presley) & See[50],I am still learning to use Wikipedia correctly,sorry! Getting back to my response: 141,I never made the false claim that Dee Stanley never lived with Elvis. Please read that bold text which you cited,that Vernon & Dee Presley had indeed been living together with Priscilla and Elvis for a considerable period of time at Graceland,of which I'm contesting.--Jaye9 (talk) 14:07, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

141,I agree Dee & Vernon Presley,soon followed by her three sons did live with Elvis,between 1960-1962(or thereabouts),I will cite it for you: "On January 19,1960,my seventh birthday,there was another call from Mom. By now we were sure we'd never get out of the orphanage. Mom kept telling us we'd all be together soon,but she'd be telling us that for months. (skipped paragraph). When we arrived,Graceland was all natural-coloured limestone.(next page/third paragraph) We lived at Graceland for the next two years in what had originally been a garage for Elvis's many cars and motorcycles. In anticipation of our arrival it had been redone into one huge room that housed Dee & Vernon and the three of us.(next 16 pages) In December of 1961,while Vernon was having our new home on Dolan Street built,we made a sudden move to a house on Hermitage Street.(skipped paragraph) Work on the house on Dolan Street moved quickly,and we could see that it was going to be a big house". taken from "Elvis My Brother",by Billy Stanley with George Erikson p.4,5 & 21--Jaye9 (talk) 14:30, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I like your recent edits, Jaye9, as you are citing your sources. However, the different sources seem to disagree in some points. I did some further research. Here are some more sources. They support the view that Priscilla was living at Graceland since December 1960.
 * Jon Pareles, The Rolling Stone Encyclopedia of Rock 'n' Roll (1983), p.439:
 * "On Christmas 1960, Priscilla Beaulieu, the teenaged daughter of an Army officer whom Presley had met in Germany, visited Graceland."
 * Kathleen Tracy, Elvis Presley: A Biography (2006), p.115-116:
 * "During the weeks of Priscilla's holiday visit, life at Graceland took a turn for the normal. Elvis lavished time and attention on Priscilla ... He even found it in his heart to be more polite and less vicious toward Dee. ... Priscilla endured the scrutiny of everyone with admirable grace. ... She had the innocent and idealistic outlook of a well-cared-for teenager. ... She was one of the few things Vernon and Elvis saw eye to eye on. Vernon made a constant fuss over Priscilla - ...- and between the two of them, her head was spinning. For her part, Priscilla seemed just as delighted to be back in America as she was to be at Graceland with Elvis. ... the house radiated a life that had been missing for years. ... As the end of Priscilla's holiday vacation neared, the thought of her leaving drove Elvis to despair. The solution was simple – she simply had to stay. She could go to school in Memphis and live at Graceland full time. Vernon was in full support. After weeks of peaceful cohabitation, Vernon was apprehensive of the mood Elvis would revert to if Priscilla left. Like everyone else, he believed Priscilla's mere presence would solve everything and make Graceland a home, happily ever after. With Vernon on the upstairs extension, Elvis talked to Joe Beaulieu for close to an hour, while Priscilla sat listening quietly but anxiously. ... After a sometimes-impassioned conversation, it had been miraculously arranged. Priscilla would move to Graceland as a guest of Vernon and Dee's, who would take personal responsibility for chaperoning her. ... Elvis enrolled Priscilla in an all-girls school, Immaculate Conception, wanting her well educated and sheltered from the attention of teenage boys. Under the guise of complying with Mr. Beaulieu's conditions, Elvis tightened a protective net around Priscilla that effectively made her a prisoner. ... The only one not thrilled with Priscilla was Parker. While it might be less difficult to pass her off as a friend of the family here for a visit, convincing the country that Elvis was a platonic host of a live-in 15-year-old girl would be almost impossible. The only saving grace was the number of people who lived at Graceland and the fact that Elvis kept her under close wraps and didn't flaunt her in public. While she adjusted to her new home, Priscilla seemed content to spend time at Graceland, but as she acclimated to her surroundings, the natural restlessness of a teenager surfaced. Elvis sternly cautioned her against going out alone at any time, citing his concern for her safety."
 * Alanna Nash,  The Colonel: The Extraordinary Story of Colonel Tom Parker and Elvis Presley (2003), p.206:
 * "The immediate promise was that a chaperoned Priscilla would live on nearby Hermitage Road with Vernon and his new wife, Dee. That arrangement lasted only a matter of weeks, Priscilla slipping back and forth between the houses."
 * This latter source seems to have found a solution for the contradicting statements. User:Onefortyone (talk) 00:34, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Final Response: The text in bold is what this was about in the first place and to conteract what was stated in that bold text. Priscilla did not move into Graceland with Elvis unti 1963,as Joe Esposito stated and by that time Vernon & Dee Presley with her sons were not living at Graceland, but in Dolan Street. This is the second time 141,I have had to respond to you,to prove what I said and didn't say,I conclude.--Jaye9 (talk) 14:50, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Did you actually read the quotes given above dealing with Priscilla's Christmas Holiday visit in December 1960 to Graceland and the arrangement made between Mr Beaulieu and the Presleys at that time, which "lasted only a matter of weeks"? I don't think so, as these sources strongly suggest that your claim that "Priscilla did not move into Graceland with Elvis until 1963," is wrong. Your own source says that "in December of 1961," Vernon had his "new home on Dolan Street built." This means that they were all living at Graceland before that date (Vernon, Dee, Priscilla and Elvis). So much for your appropriate handling of sources. Onefortyone (talk) 00:53, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Updating article
When changing the current sections to those we draft on the talk, be particularly careful not to removed base refs. Those being named refs with all the information (ie. and worked as a sewing machine operator. They met in Tupelo, Mississippi, and eloped to Pontotoc County where they married on June 17, 1933. Presley was born in East Tupelo, the second of identical twins (his brother was stillborn and given the name Jesse Garon). As an only child he "was, everyone agreed, unusually close to his mother." The family lived in a two room house just above the poverty line and attended the Assembly of God church.  In 1938, Vernon Presley was jailed for an eight dollar check forgery. It has been claimed that the absence of his father "had a profound effect upon Elvis' emotional development".  At age ten, Presley won second prize in a singing contest at the Mississippi-Alabama Fair and Dairy Show for his rendition of Red Foley's "Old Shep". In 1946, Presley's mother took Elvis to Tupelo Hardware to get him a birthday present. Although he wanted a rifle, he left the store with a $7.90 guitar. In November 1948, the family moved to Memphis, Tennessee, allegedly because Vernon—in addition to needing work—had to escape the law for transporting bootleg liquor. At school, Presley was bullied "because he was different... he stuttered and he was a mama's boy." At L. C. Humes High School, fellow students viewed the young singer as "a sad, shy, not especially attractive boy"; some made fun of him for playing "trashy" hillbilly music. In 1949, the family lived at a public housing development in one of Memphis' poorer sections. Presley practiced playing guitar in the laundry room and also played in a five-piece band with other tenants. He occasionally worked evenings to boost the family income, and began to grow his sideburns and dress in the wild, flashy clothes of Lansky Brothers on Beale Street. He stood out, especially in the conservative Deep South of the 1950s, and he was mocked for it. Despite any unpopularity, Presley was a contestant in his school's 1952 "Annual Minstrel Show" and won by receiving the most applause and thus an encore (he sang "Cold Cold Icy Fingers" and "Till I Waltz Again With You"). After graduation, Presley was still rather shy. According to Scotty Moore, he "was more comfortable just sitting there with a guitar than trying to talk to you." His third job was driving a truck for the Crown Electric Company. He began wearing his hair longer with a "ducktail"—the style of truck drivers at that time. }}

 * By the way, which base ref was removed? I cannot find a reference to Sammy Baker in the article. Onefortyone (talk) 19:34, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * That was a fake example. I don't remember which reference it was. I fixed it. The above needs to be discussed and agreed upon before being added to the article. I still believe it's too long. It needs to be trimmed.  Lara  ❤  Love  15:48, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

What, no Elvis sightings?
You guys might be amused by a surprisingly animated debate in an unlikely place, the  talk page of the NPOV policy page. The bottom line is that the absence of the Elvis sightings concept from this page is incompatible with the WP:NPOV policy. Emmanuelm (talk) 01:54, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
 * If you want to add information regarding the phenomenon of Elvis sightings, by all means, draft something up here and we'll discuss. But we're not stating a possibility that he's still alive. The coroner's report proves death.  Lara  ❤  Love  15:39, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

_____________________________________________

Ancestry
It should be worth mentioning that the American Presleys, a very rare family name, stem from a Southern Palatinate vintner named Valentin Pressler who emigrated to the U.S. around 1700. Thus the anglicized version "Presley" of the German family name. Compare to the German Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.5.29.146 (talk) 14:25, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your interest. Presley's ancestry details have been mentioned in the article, though not in the main body of text - see footnote 4. Rikstar (talk) 23:11, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Two Things
Any one who saw the thing on elvis on cnn saw that they said elvis was related to oprah throw slavery and slave was pregnant by elvis's ancenstor which made them related and 2 there was something about no photo's were allowed at his funeral and somebody took a quick picture and the elvis in the coffin looked like the younger elvis so possible of what alot of ppl think faked death. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.254.160.170 (talk) 02:36, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Any extraordinary claims about Presley need equally extraordinary evidence to back them up. If there are several reliable sources that show he was related to Oprah, that's fine, but reliable, well cited sources do not guarantee the claim will be mentioned in the article, though it may qualify for a place in the footnotes. As for the picture of Presley in his coffin, it appeared on the front page of the National Enquirer. It's a pretty bad photo by all accounts and he doesn't look young, he just looks retouched - and very much dead. But if you can quote reliable sources that claim otherwise... Rikstar (talk) 07:59, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Elvis Presley discography — Chart Help Needed
I am wondering if anyone knows the charting history of which charts studio albums, live albums, compilations, soundtracks and singles were on, US Billboard, UK, Canada, Australia, and where this information can be founded. Thanks! Hpfan9374 (talk) 08:57, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

There are plenty of books listing Presley's charting history in various countries, but try googling "Elvis chart statistics", several times, each time adding the name of desired country and the word "album" or "singles", and you will find at least some of the info you require. The stats for his film soundtracks might be on separate sites. Rikstar (talk) 10:55, 24 January 2008 (UTC)  a girl in coe school is doeing a report on elvis The Guinnness "British Hit Singles" now covers albums & singles. Try www.bibleofpop.cm as well. Krustybiker (talk) 19:46, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

go elvis
the girl did this. the one in coe♣ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.186.53.26 (talk) 20:04, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Article Vandalised
The Article Vandalised today, January 29. Im trying to fix it. This Article needs to be protected. Gduwen

I only saw parts removed that had little to do with Elvis, text that OneFortyOne likes; sentances that wouldn't see the light of day in Encyclopaedia Britannica —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.208.183.44 (talk) 21:19, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
 * IP 130.208.183.44 is identical with my old opponent Lochdale who has been banned from editing Elvis-related topics by arbcom decision. See the last paragraphs of this discussion and, and . Onefortyone (talk) 00:32, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * No I'm not
 * The article has been indefinitely protected.  Lara  ❤  Love  23:16, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Fine, let's keep on trashing Elvis *sigh* —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.208.186.17 (talk) 11:48, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Not everyone who has been able to edit this article is interested in "trashing" Elvis. If you can, be more specific about your objections on these pages. That might lead to this article moving forward, something many of us want, in spite of continuing difficulties. You might also consider signing in, it looks better. Rikstar (talk) 11:07, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
 * IP 130.208.186.17 is already signed in as banned User:Lochdale since August 12, 2005. See above. Onefortyone (talk) 01:20, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Then let's talk about trashing Gladys. "Priscilla Presley recalls her as "a surreptitious drinker and alcoholic."[15]" This is in the Early Years section. Priscilla did not meet Elvis until he was in the military late in the 50s. I don't see what this quote has to do with the early years. Steve Pastor (talk) 20:52, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

I agree. Her drink/health problems is mentioned later and it does not need to be metioned in the Early Years section. So that's two of us with the same opinion. If more people agree than disagree with this change, then the edit should go ahead. The minority who disagree will have to accept it. This is the only way this article is going to move forward. I still prefer the "2nd draft" of Dec 6:

I agree too, and ip 130.208.186.17 is not user Lochdale and is not banned —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.208.183.44 (talk) 11:19, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * You must be joking, IP 130.208... Your contributions to the Elvis talk page in December 2006 certainly show that you are identical with banned user Lochdale. See also this contribution by IP 130.208.183.44 and these edits by Lochdale:, , . Onefortyone (talk) 18:37, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

No, I'm not joking - do you like twisting the truth? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.208.183.44 (talk) 22:30, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Trying again at WP:ECotW
Rikstar (talk) 16:04, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree. This is my preferred version as well.  Lara  ❤  Love  17:11, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I do not agree, as important information about the character of Elvis’s parents is missing. In my opinion, the revised fourth draft is the best. See . Priscilla's statement about Gladys is very important, as she heard a lot about the character of Elvis’s mother from Vernon, when she lived together with Elvis's father and his new wife at Graceland. It should not only be mentioned that Elvis "was, everyone agreed, unusually close to his mother" (Guralnick), but also that the absence of his father "had a profound effect upon Elvis' emotional development" and that at school, Elvis was bullied "because he was different... he stuttered and he was a mama's boy." Furthermore, it must be mentioned that fellow students viewed the young singer as "a sad, shy, not especially attractive boy" and that some made fun of him for playing "trashy" hillbilly music. This well-sourced information clearly shows that Elvis was not seen as an infant prodigy from the beginning. By way of compromise and in order to shorten the text, the rifle story may perhaps be removed. And what about the following sentence, which is much shorter: "At age ten, Presley won second prize in a singing contest at the Mississippi-Alabama Fair and Dairy Show for his rendition of Red Foley's 'Old Shep.' " Concerning the content disagreements, outside views would be helpful (possibly backed by uninvolved adminstrators), as arbitrator FT2 has suggested. There is also this statement by Egghead06 that should make you think: "There appears to be a drive here to only have one view point - put them all as long as they are referenced and let the reader decide. There also appears to be a drive to keep the article short so as to achieve some internal star or pat-on-the back." Onefortyone (talk) 20:01, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * The last sentence there from Egghead06 is an ignorant one. We're trying to improve the article, and bring it down to a readable length. Months have passed with no progress on this article. It's time to stop with the pointless back and forth and start making consensus-based changes. Right now, consensus is against you, but let's see how it goes after others weigh in.  Lara  ❤  Love  21:11, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * To my mind, Egghead06 is right. There is still a tendency to remove well-referenced material from the Elvis article in order to get rid of more critical information. Interestingly, all users who now agree to remove critical content, were involved in a rejected arbcom case against me. Is this really consensus against me from a neutral point of view? I don't think so. Wikipedia says:
 * The Wikipedia policy of editing from a neutral point of view, a central and non-negotiable principle of Wikipedia, applies to situations where there are conflicting viewpoints and contemplates that significant viewpoints regarding such situations all be included in as fair a manner as possible.
 * According to Wikipedia policy, it is highly desirable that editors cite the sources of the information in their edits, especially on controversial articles. Removal of references from articles is generally considered inappropriate.
 * Neutral point of view as defined on Wikipedia contemplates inclusion of all significant perspectives regarding a subject. While majority perspectives may be favored by more detailed coverage, minority perspectives should also receive sufficient coverage. No perspective is to be presented as the "truth"; all perspectives are to be attributed to their advocates.
 * When you find a passage in an article biased or inaccurate, improve it if you can. If that is not possible, and you disagree completely with a point of view expressed in an article, think twice before simply deleting it. Rather, balance it with your side of the story. Make sure that you provide reliable sources.
 * For the purpose of dispute resolution when there is uncertainty whether a party is one user with sockpuppets or several users with similar editing habits they may be treated as one user with sockpuppets.
 * This means that brief information on the character of Elvis's parents or Elvis's guitar playing at school etc. should not be removed from the first section of the article because some editors do not like the information, especially in view of the fact that the material is well sourced. Onefortyone (talk) 22:42, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Arbcom did not rule that you were right. They rejected the case and, if I recall correctly, directed us to Enforcement because there was previously a case against you. I'm not reading all this over and over again. You made your point. Now we're waiting for others to join in.  Lara  ❤  Love  05:06, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * You know you are getting somewhere near the truth when people refer to your comments as 'ignorant'!! Just who decides what is 'readable length'? This endless quest for Wiki awards/stars and brevity sometimes blinds people to what these articles are all about - accuracy, completeness and notability. For an article on someone like Elvis this is never going to allow the Wiki mantra of 'keep it short and readable' to work to everyone's satisfaction. Unless you allow all possible, notable information, with good references, to stand you are debasing Wiki to suit personal and arbitrary goals--Egghead06 (talk) 09:34, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

 * "Unless you allow all possible, notable information, with good references, to stand..." Really? All possible, notable information?? Well we can combine everything from both Guralnick books - and add Albert Goldman's tome for 'balance'. There's a 1500+ page Elvis article that won't debase wiki.

 * The FA submission (c.1936?) was criticised because it was too long; it contained trivia and was badly laid out. There are now whole link articles (Sun recordings, Cultural Impact, Films, Memphis Mafia, etc.) in which readers can look for more of this notable information. Therefore the main article could be shortened. 141 states that a reference to Gladys' drinking must appear at the start. I did not insist it should be removed; I merely observed that reference to her death from drink-related hepatitis occurs in a later section. We need notable information - we don't need repetition. 141 conveniently failed to acknowledge or discuss this point, preferring as usual to simply shore up his unilateral position for the umpteemth time. If there is a 'drive to have only one viewpoint' in this article, that view point is 141's.

 * 141 states: "This means that brief information on the character of Elvis's parents or Elvis's guitar playing at school etc. should not be removed from the first section of the article because some editors do not like the information". I already stated why the Priscilla quote does not need to be in the Early Years section. It is not because I "do not like the information". I am growing tired of these personal "Elvis Fan" claims of bias from 141. We desperately need more viewpoints on moving this all forward, but who in there right mind would bother? Rikstar (talk) 12:38, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

 * Enough of the hyperbole! 1500+ pages !! You've conveniently overlooked my use of the word 'notable'. This is the crux of the whole problem. Who decides notable and who decides readable length. Answer -  we all do. Wiki is open to everyone.
 * I think people need to take a step back and ask themselves, 'If I knew nothing about Elvis Presley, just what would I hope to learn from reading this article'. This should be the key question when deciding what is relevant. --Egghead06 (talk) 12:59, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

 * Great. Wiki is open to everyone. Including people who refuse to agree to a consensus of opinion on length and notable content. I have been trying to edit this article as if it is being read by those who know nothing about Presley. It's a key question alright, one I don't think certain other editors are addressing themselves. The point I was at pains to make above was we don't need repetition regarding Gladys and drinking. No one who wants that mentioned in the Early Years has addressed that either. 141 has as much right to have his "well-sourced" content considered for inclusion, but his history shows an alarming preoccupation with negative content, ranging from Elvis singing numerous homo-erotic lyrics to having sex with his mother. So much for his ideas about what is relevant in an encyclopedic article. You'd think there was no negative content at all in the article. It's OK for those not involved in spending hours keeping out such trashy content, not fearing the emergence of more of the same, and not still unhappy with some of 141's edits that he refuses to have changed or removed despite consensus. May be all this is mildly amusing to those not involved, but some of us want limits on content that are not unreasonable. Rikstar (talk) 13:52, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * What are you talking about, Rikstar? There is nothing on "homo-erotic lyrics" or Elvis "having sex with his mother" in the current version of the article, although several sources, among them Elvis experts Greil Marcus and Albert Goldman, deal with such topics. On the other hand, there is a clear tendency to remove information Elvis fans do not like from the article. These are the facts. As the first section briefly deals with the singer's father and mother, short statements about their character are necessary, including Gladys's alcoholism, which deeply affected Elvis's life. Later in the article, we read that "his mother continued to drink excessively." So her alcohol problems should be mentioned earlier. Significantly, the versions you, Steve Pastor and LaraLove prefer do not mention that the absence of Presley's father "had a profound effect upon Elvis' emotional development," that at school, young Elvis was bullied "because he was different... he stuttered and he was a mama's boy," or that fellow students viewed the young singer as "a sad, shy, not especially attractive boy" and that some made fun of him for playing "trashy" hillbilly music. Sorry, if you compare the second and fourth drafts, only this kind of well-sourced information has been removed in order to "improve" (or should it be whitewash) the first section. The problem is that, apart from my more critical view (and some vandals), only Elvis fans seem to be interested in the article. Therefore, unbiased third-party opinions would be helpful. Onefortyone (talk) 18:45, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay, here's a question, for the the absence of Presley's father "had a profound effect upon Elvis' emotional development," is that backed by a psychologist or some other mental health professional?  Lara  ❤  Love  06:12, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Patrick Humphrey’s writes in his book on Elvis (p.117): "There is a widely held believe among psychologists that the disappearance of Vernon from Elvis’ life when the King was three (Vernon was jailed for passing bad cheques) had a profound effect upon Elvis' emotional development. At that age a child naturally goes through a separation anxiety from its mother, which fathers can often help with. Elvis only had Gladys. They slept in the same bed up until Elvis was a young teen. Elvis loved his father, of course. But a big part of this love was probably based upon his mother’s love for the elder Presley. After the death of Gladys, Elvis kept Vernon close and welcomed his father’s second family into his own home (Vernon’s second wife Dee had three young sons, all of whom moved into Graceland). Vernon loved his son but hated his Mafia."
 * In addition, Elaine Dundy says about Elvis’s mother (p.71): "it was agony for her to leave her child even for a moment with anyone else, to let anyone else touch Elvis. Maternal love was not for Gladys a prettily sentimental attachment. Rather it was a passionate concentration which deepened into a painful intensity when her son was not there, directly in her sight. She imagined all sorts of horrors. She imagined he was being tortured and she was not there to stop it. It was physical torment for her to be separated from him. Maternal devotion is constantly misrepresented as either grasping, clinging, stifling or pathetic. It is none of these things. Every mother of a very young child has the primordial conviction, deeper than reason, that as long as her child is within her eyesight she will be able to protect him from all harm. Generally the mother outgrows this as the child grows up but Gladys all her life remained anxious over each one of Elvis' separations from her."
 * Freudian and other sexual psychologists say that Presley is a "classic example of the mother/Madonna/whore split." He "adored his mother and never recovered from her early death." He met Priscilla "when she was 14. She became a mother at 22. It is said that Elvis never made love to her again after the birth of his daughter, and would never have sex with a woman who had had a baby. He did not remarry after his divorce from Priscilla and did not have any more children." See Carol Martin-Sperry, Couples and Sex: An Introduction to Relationship Dynamics and Psychosexual Concepts (2004), p.24. Onefortyone (talk) 20:02, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

 * Yes. Perhaps those wishing to comment on the situation should first do some research on it. The past two years of history on this talk page would be a good start. Then there's the ArbCom case. Maybe reading the article would help too. Of course, cancel your appointments for the day, as it's not a light read. Consider, also, as you read, that there are somewhere around 15 articles that stem off of this one. So if there's something you wanted to know more about, that's where it's at. Absolutely everything Elvis should not be included in this article. It's redundant and makes for poor reading. Egghead, have you read the article in its entirety? Let's start there.  Lara  ❤  Love  17:35, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Here is a shorter version of the fourth draft
Perhaps this may be the best version. However, I am not happy that there is nothing on Elvis's ancestry in the main text. Onefortyone (talk) 20:09, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

 * Perhaps. And perhaps 141 does know exactly what Rikstar is talking about when he bothers to leave comments on this page. If 141 continues to question what and why I made the above point about his talk history/contributions, I'll gladly hammer it home; I'm sure some neutral/armchair observers who haven't got their hands dirty from this article would find it interesting. But we don't really want to go there... we've got this damn fine article to write!!!!!

 * The Gladys stuff about her health/death could easily be slightly rewritten to meet 141's needs, but we haven't got to that section yet because we're so mired in the crap of rewriting the first section (see above). People really need to think about existing content in the rest of the article before stubbornly insistng on edits in isolation. LaraLove is of course correct: everyone should read this article and talk page in full (oh, what joy...) and know enough about other Presley articles to judge if certain contentious edits that persist should be in this main article.

 * I again vehemently oppose 141's insinuations that "only Elvis fans" seem to be interested in this article. I have personally contributed enough negative content - and opposed enough fan-biased content - to prove my position. The fact that 141 has previously admitted as much, but then reverts back to his tedious fan bias claims, is a real smear on my character as a responsible editor, and it could deliberately mislead and prejudice new editors. It's a disgrace. Rikstar (talk) 03:20, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

 * I have read all four drafts and the secound draft sits well with me to be included in the main article,as it flows freely and is easy to read. Also, I believe that if the article is to long it will bore the general public to tears and they will click off and go somewhere else,have you heard the expression to much information! We could also add,that elvis chose not to wear jeans after he became famous,as it reminded him of being poor. I mean, where does end?
 * User: Lara Love response to User: Onefortyone comments dated 11 February 2008. Okay,here's a question for the "the absence of presley's father had a profound effect upon Elvis' emotional development." Is that backed by a psychologist or some other mental health professional.
 * Great point Lara I don't believe there is,and it is my opinion that if a psychologist or some other mental health professional was to give his or her opinion,based on biographies and the like,would be very unprofessional to do so. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaye9 (talk • contribs) 12:21, 11 February 2008
 * For different opinions, see the sources cited here. Onefortyone (talk) 21:35, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, Lara
 * 1/ Of course I have read it. Why would anyone comment on something they hadn't read?
 * 2/ Rikstar - like it or not comment on this and any other Wiki page is open to all - even those who haven't dirtied their hands.
 * 3/ I hate censorship and cutting notable stuff out to make and article short or because people will get bored (good grief!) is a very dangerous road to take.
 * 4/ I have no views, one way or the other on 141 but wasn't an attempt made to ban him and an attempt which failed? --Egghead06 (talk) 16:06, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

I completely disagree. This is why we have articles branch off of this one. Rikstar is only slightly exaggerating about how many pages this article would be if we included everything. The article is also redundant. We don't have to mention the same thing in two different sections. We also don't need to back everything with multiple examples. But, we've already been over this ad nauseam. Which can be found in the sections above. As far as this latest suggestion, for example, it is not necessary to note that Gladys later becomes a drunk. This is the Early life section. Her alcoholism is mentioned later when it is relevant.  Lara  ❤  Love  16:16, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I reiterate - notable stuff. Notable being the operative word. Funny how you and Rikstar seem to keep on ignoring my use of this word. I do not wish 1500+ on anyone but could you really fill that many with NOTABLE info - no thought not. Oh yes - please answer my item 4/!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Egghead06 (talk • contribs) 16:23, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

 * I acknowledged and specifically used the word "notable" in my response to Egghead06 and in relation to 141's contributions. So much for my ignoring the use (and I mean use) of the word. Egghead06 has already referred to the complexity and depth of the Elvis phenomenon, much of it, absolutely reams of it, negative and positive, being "notable" And it's been duly noted - by the best biographers (I think I made a "hyperbolic" reference to this).

 * Oh, item 4... So the attempt to ban 141 failed; speaks volumes about something, but NOT about my attempts to move this article forward, nor to encourage other editors from getting positively involved, nor to get this article to achieve GA/FA status. I am already on record as stating 141 has the capacity and resources to move this article on to FA status, but his continuing comment and editing history indicates a desire to skew this article in a decidely unencyclopedic direction (that's anti-wiki, isn't it?).

 * If Egghead06 wants the Presley article to include the majority of 141's "well-sourced" input in the name of open, "anything goes" wiki philosophy, I'm on the verge of being quite sickened enough to let that happen, as I have been for... let's see now, hundreds of hours churning out words over about a year?? I wonder how Egghead06 would have taken the scars of battle if he himself had had to personally endure battling with 141. Maybe he would have thrown in the towel like other useful editors have done. We'll probably never know. I will probably jack all this in soon as I am losing the will to live... I can always console myself by watching Presley's shit movies and listening to his sublime voice on a couple dozen tracks. Lord help this article if any real "ELVIS FANS" with 141's tenacity get involved... World War III beckons... Rikstar (talk) 20:01, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Rikstar, sweetheart, it's okay. Haha. Yes, Egghead, I already acknowledged your 4/ earlier when you mentioned it. The original ArbCom resulted in no ban, the second request was rejected and referred to enforcement. But considering the days of our lives we've already wasted on this article over 141, no one had the will or energy to fill for enforcement. And notable or not, that doesn't justify including information more than once in the article, or backing it with multiple examples and quotes. It also doesn't make it necessary for this article, as there are more focused articles on various topics which allow for some information on the lower side of notable to be mentioned merely in passing. As a little note, Egghead, I believe, is a female.  Lara  ❤  Love  20:22, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Believe it or not, this new version of the fourth draft is shorter than the second draft:

Any comments? Onefortyone (talk) 20:46, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

 * This is not a competition to produce THE shortest version of the said section: anyone thinking this has not understood the reasons for rewriting this and the other sections. It's of interest to mention that the Presley parents eloped, for example. This says something about their relationship and perhaps their respective families, without laboring the point with quotes and sources. The reader can be left to conclude what they like about them needing/wanting to elope, without spelling it out, and especially if no further information is available. This probably applies to other parts of this article. Did Gladys have "alcohol problems" before or around the time she worked as a sewing machine operator? I don't know, or I can't remember. Rikstar (talk) 22:20, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Some months ago you were very busy shortening all sections of the article. So it's not necessary to produce the shortest version of each section. This is also my opinion. If you think that it is of some interest to mention that the Presley parents eloped, you may add, "they eloped to, and were married in..." I have no problem with the inclusion of this detail. If other users are of the opinion that Gladys's drinking problems are equally important, they should be allowed to include this fact. This is how Wikipedia works. Onefortyone (talk) 01:32, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I thought 141 would twist my words on this shortening issue - and he has. I hate this. Rikstar (talk) 07:19, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Is there a reference for when her alcohol issues began?  Lara  ❤  Love  22:36, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, there are several references. I did some further research. Here are some sources:
 * Kathleen Tracy, Elvis Presley: A Biography (2006) says, "While Vernon was serving his time in prison, Gladys found solace in Elvis and, increasingly, in drinking. Even though she drank in private, her bloodshot eyes and the lingering aroma of stale liquor gave her away. She also began missing work..." (p. 17). The author adds (p.23) that those who were like Gladys "owed their extra weight to drinking or avoiding field work. Alcohol was cheap; food might be hard to come by, but one could always find a drink."
 * According to Jane Ellen Wayne's chapter on Elvis Presley in her book, The Leading Men of MGM (2006), in younger years "she also enjoyed an occasional night out drinking and dancing" (p.368). The author also mentions that "Gladys and Vernon were both heavy drinkers" (p.373) and that "Gladys took Benzedrine and consumed vodka to excess to ease the pain of loneliness" (p.377).
 * Rex Mansfield, Elisabeth Mansfield and Zoe Terrill write in their book, Sergeant Presley: Our Untold Story of Elvis' Missing Years (2002): "she had a weight problem (Gladys had been taking diet pills on and off for some time) and a drinking problem." (p.54)
 * J. G. Ballard says that "despite her own well-developed taste for drugs and alcohol, Gladys seems to have offered Presley rock-like support throughout her short life." See J. G. Ballard, A User's Guide to the Millennium: Essays and Reviews (1997), p.39.
 * There are many more references of this kind. Other sources deal with her liver problems caused by drinking heavily for many years. See, for instance, Elaine Dundy's chapter on "The Death of Gladys" in Elvis and Gladys. Onefortyone (talk) 00:38, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I support this version with the first reference provided above to back the statement of her drinking and Rikstar's additional of their elopement.  Lara  ❤  Love  01:51, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * So do I - let's have some clear preferences noted on here!--Egghead06 (talk) 08:05, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

I concur, absolutely, unequivocally. Except for the omission of the Johnny Burnette quote, but I'm not gonna let that get in the way of this article's progress. Rikstar (talk) 09:57, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

 * It was very pleasing for me to read these recent few edits from everyone,which all sounded so positive,good stuff,hope it continues. 141,as part of your last edits you mentioned Elaine Dundy's chapter on "The Death of Gladys" in "Elvis and Gladys",would you mind showing this in more detail please.(I'm curious) I read her book many years ago,and I thought she was such a brilliant writer,which it had to find in alot of Elvis related books unfortunately.--Jaye9 (talk) 12:17, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * The said chapter of Elaine Dundy's book deals with Gladys's hepatitis and its pathology in more detail from medical and psychological points of view. On p.318, the author writes, "one vital clue she and her family kept secret: her alcoholic intake." Dundy also talks about Gladys’s "increasing nausea" later at Graceland and that "she had to be helped more and more in her cooking chores," that she forgot to take her medicines when she drank, etc. etc. In another chapter, the author says, "She was drinking a lot. At the end she was drinking all the time. Vodka. Where'd she get it from? Vernon — he give it to her. Just to keep her quiet." (p.294) In addition, here is Dundy's statement about Elvis's father: Vernon "didn't work very hard or very steadily. ... He had been known all his young life as a 'jellybean' – by definition weak, spineless, and work-shy." (p.10) Onefortyone (talk) 00:24, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

The only listed material that talks about Gladys drinking -specifically - when Elvis was young is the one published in 2006. That book also seems to be saying that the Presley's lost their house because of Gladys' drinking, and her missing work, citing details such as the alcohol could be smelled on her breath, she had blood shot eyes, etc. Who were her sources for these statements? Remember, she is writing about the 1940s. I think this reveals the author's predjudice "The author adds (p.23) that those who were like Gladys "owed their extra weight to drinking or avoiding field work. Alcohol was cheap; food might be hard to come by, but one could always find a drink." Was Gladys working or not? Elvis was  ~ 3 years old at this time. Personally, I do not accept the penned in 2006 account about Gladys drinking, and it being a problem, at that time. If she lists who her sources were, I could change my opinion. "Those who were like Gladys", indeed. Is it verifiable at this point. Yeah, but I prefer "the highest standards", and hope you all start thinking that way.) Steve Pastor (talk) 21:43, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Could it be that you simply do not like sources telling the truth about Gladys's alcoholism? There can be no doubt that Gladys was working. In his book, Double Trouble: Bill Clinton and Elvis Presley in a Land of No Alternatives (2001), Greil Marcus cites another woman who "had worked at a local garment factory with Gladys Presley, who had married Vernon Presley in June 1933; now Gladys was expecting twins..." (p.100). Some further sources. When Gladys's friends and co-workers collected some money for her shortly after the birth of Elvis, Elaine Dundy says, they were warned: "Don't give it to her in money." " He'll only drink it up." (p.10) Bobbie Ann Mason, Elvis Presley (2002), writes about the young couple (p.9): "I think of Elvis's parents, Vernon and Gladys, as a pair of cutups — teasing, playing cards, drinking beer, dancing." Connie Kirchberg and Marc Hendrickx add in their book, Elvis Presley, Richard Nixon, and the American Dream (p.62): "Like Gladys, Grandma Presley was known to enjoy a drink or two..." Interestingly, the Presleys did not talk about their drinking habits. According to Larry Geller and Joel Spector, If I Can Dream: Elvis' Own Story (1989), p.46, "Some people ... suggested that Gladys drank then, but if Elvis knew, it was his secret. He occasionally remarked about 'the drinkers' in his extended family, and he detested drunks. Elvis did say that Gladys would have an occasional beer, but that was all." Onefortyone (talk) 00:44, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Elvis and drugs
This is totally unproven- that he died from drugs. Please, let's change this wild assertion. There is absolutely no proof. None whatsoever.

Matthew Laffert (talk) 10:08, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * The reliable sources say otherwise. And I wouldn't consider it a "wild assertion". His excessive drug use is/was no secret. The drugs he took are known, as well as a good idea of the quantities. It's not a stretch to put the pieces together and determine that chronic drug use contributed to his death. And that is a widespread belief.  Lara  ❤  Love  21:06, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

No man, you got it wrong. Check out the Ilchi Lee article, and you will understand that your wild assertions re: Elvis's drug use are bogus. We are establishing outstanding criteria there that prove your sources aren't worth a penny. You need real, valid, quantifiable sources. Those that stand the test of scrutiny.

Matthew Laffert (talk) 10:45, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

No man... I've just checked out the Ilchi Lee website. You seem to be arguing against the observations of medical doctors, medical examiners, etc. using beliefs based on Eastern mysticism. I don't see much in the way of compatibility between these. You mention "real, valid, quantifiable sources. Those that stand the test of scrutiny". That is exactly what we have in a plethora of documentation on Presley. It is extraordinary to claim all this is bogus: the onus is on you to provide meaningful, accessible and extraordinary evidence to support your somewhat sweeping and perplexing claims. Nothing on the websites you refer to contains this kind of evidence. It is extremely unlikely that your assertions will find credence amongst Presley article editors. Rikstar (talk) 12:25, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Elvis' Jewish Roots
Not sure why the page keeps getting reverted back to an anti-Semtic and untrue claim that Elvis' Jewish lineage is only valid in Nazi Germany. It's a well known fact that Elvis' maternal Grandmother was Jewish. In the Jewish religion a person's religious lineage is passed down via the mother. See http://www.elvispresleynews.com/JewishElvis.html or type into any search engine the terms "Elvis Presley" and "Jewish roots" and you'll see numerous articles and research stating with 100% surety that as far as Jewish law, theologians, The Wall Street Journal (in a 1998 article), and the Jewish faithful are concerned, Elvis is Jewish. However I think we can also agree that despite this he certainly wasn't a practicing Jew. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SUNY Boy (talk • contribs) 03:39, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Some months ago we had a lot of trouble trying to list Presley's ancestry in the main article. It was changed continually, with people arguing about which bits of his lineage should be listed. As a compromise, mention of whether he was of Jewish, German, Venusian, or any other ancestry were left out, but links were kept and interested readers could click on those. Now the opening paragragh has explicit mention of his ancestry again, and it's causing problems again. Why not just have the links, as it was previously? Please, let us all be aware of LaraLove's wikiproject (top of page) and make contributions accordingly. This article has been a nightmare to edit, and new editors need to be aware this. Rikstar (talk) 10:40, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Although I think we can all agree that until that time, the anti-Semitic reference to Nazis needs to be removed.SUNY Boy (talk) 16:25, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

 * Presley was not a practicing Jew and did not consider himself Jewish. He was Protestant. It is not anti-semetic to of me to disagree with you and say no, he is not Jewish and that he should not be listed under the Jewish singers category. Also, it is ridiculous to include Jewish with German, Scottish, French, and Cherokee as it is a religion, not a nationality. NewYork1956 (talk) 23:59, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
 * My, my a little testy aren't we? I wasn't referring to you as being anti-semitic.  That would be silly.  I was referring to the suggestion made by someone else that tracing one's Jewish roots through the mother's side of the family was something the Nazis did.SUNY Boy (talk) 22:12, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
 * "Cherokee" is not a nationality, either. And I'd think it's obvious that Elvis was not of German, Scottish, or French nationality either. He had ethnic French, German, and Scottish ancestry, as well as ethnic Jewish and Cherokee ancestry. All Hallow's Wraith (talk) 06:06, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism?
Is this vandalism, or not? I'm not sure if it is or not, needs someone who knows more about the subject to cast an eye over it. Mjroots (talk) 22:13, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I have reverted all of it. It removed criticisms and other info that reflected Elvis in a negative light. It also changed to an informal tone; referring to him as Elvis in the article is not appropriate for an encyclopedia.  Lara  ❤  Love  23:27, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

This article is going nowhere
It's all very sad, but I baulk at the possibility of engaging in any further attempts to improve this article unless we get more editors involved with an eye on producing a good, encyclopedic entry. The vandals have been rampant, necessitating the lock. I will only peruse these and my talk pages occasionally. As things stand, I'm outta here! Rikstar (talk) 19:29, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

 * Consensus seems to be the way other articles on here get done. Raise an issue, get consensus, make changes, move on. If anyone disagrees with consensus their changes get zapped - easy! Wiki is no place for approval seekers--Egghead06 (talk) 08:25, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

 * Face it: you lost the battle with 141! All the energy has been drained out of this project by 141.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 154.20.129.40 (talk) 07:29, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Living person?
Why is there a blp near the top of this page? Isn't Elvis Presley dead? —Helland (talk) 21:36, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Removed the header in question (WP:BOLD). —Helland (talk) 14:02, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
 * He is alive and well in space...on an alien vessel...being probed. Haven't you heard?--Veritas (talk) 15:10, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Fat Elvis Picture
Does anybody have a picture of Fat Elvis? All the pictures are of him still thin. Klosterdev (talk) 05:43, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
 * There are not many photographs of the fat Las Vegas Elvis, because Elvis Presley Enterprises is a "well-run marketing machine" that runs on tight regulation of Elvis's images and lawsuits, when necessary. EPE, for instance, "absolutely refuses to license a product picturing an overweight Elvis." Therefore, the Wikipedia article should include a photograph of fat Elvis. For such images, see, for instance, or . Onefortyone (talk) 20:44, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Presley appeared "fat" largely (excuse the pun) because he had an enlarged colon. The observations about suppressing pictures of a "fat Elvis" are no doubt true. Given that we do eventually have a picture included of a fat Elvis, are wikipedians going to ensure that there is, for example, also a picture of an emaciated Rock Hudson in his article, given that he suffered and died from AIDS? Licensing of products is one thing, but does wikipedia need to go to such lengths, given the text detailing the demise of celebrities? Rikstar (talk) 15:45, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Elvis's Jewish Ancestry
I am not biased in saying this, but Elvis Jewish ancestry has never been properly substatiated, much of it is a result of massive speculation and therories. The wiki article dosnt even have a proper citation which substataiantes his jewish ancestry. I do not suggest that the aspect where is states he has jewish ancestry be removed, however I do suggest next to where it states he has jewish ancestry, there should me a phrase that reads "Topic of debate" in parenthisies "(---)" next to it.

why
Isnt there anytalk of People who Belive that Elvis Faked his death?Joe ferst (talk) 17:42, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

 * Yes, he's still alive and he's still only 39 years old! Isn't that amazing, after all these years!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 154.20.129.40 (talk) 07:26, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

drug misuse
I'm new to Wikipedia, but isn't it biased to call drug abuse "drug misuse", as it is called throughout this article? Drug misuse infers there is a good way to use drugs, which is a statement of opinion. I haven't been able to change that myself as I'm not allowed to edit this page, but the phrase drug misuse drives me nuts. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rjk2398 (talk • contribs) 12:22, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

 * Good point. According to my education - and my work in health services with drug users - if you abuse something, you cause or can cause harm or damage to the thing being abused e.g. as in child abuse. Therefore "abusing" anything, be it a drug, a beer bottle or whatever, indicates that those things end up being damaged. Clearly Presley did not harm drugs, they ended up harming him big style, hence the need to distinguish his actions as misuse (BTW, surely it wouldn't be a matter of opinion to state that there are good ways to use prescription drugs, like for their intended therapeutic benefits?).

 * I don't think the distinction has anything to do with bias; it is a pity so many people use the terms "abuse" and "misuse" interchangeably (that drives me nuts). Words can be used, misused or abused in any language and in doing so there is a different meaning in each case, so writers need to be careful in choosing their prefix. Rikstar (talk) 09:20, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

 * abuse To use wrongly or improperly Webster's new Riverside University Dictionary 1984 Steve Pastor (talk) 20:42, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
 * "misuse (noun) improper or inappropriate use" (Chambers Online); "Misuse of prescription drugs can lead to abuse, addiction, and other serious problems." (About.com: Arthritis). So maybe Presley misused prescription drugs and died from drug abuse? Anyway I got no feelings about what gets changed or not. Rikstar (talk) 00:12, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Elvis
ELVIS WAS ALSO KNOWN AS THE KING. HE HAD NICE HAIR. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.228.16.51 (talk) 15:58, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Halls of Fame
"To date, he is the only performer to have been inducted into four music halls of fame."

This is not true. Michael Jackson has been inducted into the Grammy Hall of Fame (for recordings), the Songwriters Hall of Fame, The Rock and Roll Hall of Fame (twice, as a solo artist and with the Jackson Five), and in the Vocal Group Hall of Fame (with the Jackson Five).

Celestius17 (talk) 23:42, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

I'll amend this. Rikstar (talk) 13:09, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Acting career - gay references
The following quote has been deleted by Rikstar: Interesting to see another homoerotic, "orgasmic" reference being added to this article by 141 (April 8), an editor with a checkered history of making such observations that I and others do not feel are justified. Stick it in the article about Jailhouse Rock instead; the section here is about his acting career in general - not an analysis of his indivdual films. Rikstar (talk) 13:07, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * According to Brett Farmer, "the orgasmic gyrations of Elvis Presley and his band of male prisoners in the 'Jailhouse Rock' sequence from the 1957 film of the same name ... provide instances of a spectacular eroticization, if not homoeroticization, of the male image that is quite unusual in mainstream cinema." See Brett Farmer, Spectacular Passions: Cinema, Fantasy, Gay Male Spectatorships (Duke University Press, 2000), p.86. Onefortyone (talk) 01:20, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
 * In all the articles and programs about Elvis I've seen or read, the only place I've ever seen or heard a gay reference about him is in this Wikipedia article. His girlfriends, yeah plenty, gay - never.  Maria202 (talk) 16:56, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

If anyone has the time or for that matter the patience,go to www.topix.net/forum/who/elvis-presley,go to topix,scroll down to Elvis was a Closet Homosexual,read the discussions made by "Elvis the Pelvis".Duisburg Germany. I don't know if it's just my imagination running away with me,but I beleive "Elvis the Pelvis" and editor:141 are one of the same,either in person or kindred spirit. 141 is this is really you,I'm intrigued,you have always come across as a very skilled writer,who can run rings around me in that department,but unlike me you're not an elvis fan,why would you be bothered going on a chat room with a few elvis fans,who only seem to discuss their love and interest for the man,their not hurting anybody. Wikipedia is one thing,but an elvis chat room,oh come on. However,if this is not you,than I will appologise, in that case "Elvis the Pelvis is definately a copy cat,who seems to have cut and pasted a large portion of you edits here on Wikipedia,also in one of his posts he stated in part "I'm interested in the problems of gay mega stars from a psychological point",arn't you interested in gender study books and reading biographies,not only that,he is a fellow countryman to boot,a match made in heaven. You should get in touch with him to join you in the elvis wikipedia article and you can bounce off each other on every aspect of elvis's life in psychoanalysing bliss for the both of you,but add nausea for the rest of us. Oh just quickly 141,if you do respond to the above,I will be going away for a week on work related business,I won't be back untill the weekend.--Jaye9 (talk) 10:10, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I am amused by your contribution. There can be no doubt that "Elvis the Pelvis" is well aware of both the Wikipedia articles on Elvis Presley and the heated discussions on Talk:Elvis Presley. Nearly every controversial contribution concerning Presley's possible homosexuality has been literally borrowed from the Wikipedia pages. I find this thread very interesting as it shows the narrow-mindedness of the fans, yet it should be entitled "Elvis was a closet(ed) [not closed] homosexual." Notwithstanding, it seems that my recent quote from Brett Farmer's study, Spectacular Passions, has been overlooked by "Elvis the Pelvis". This is inexcusable. By the way, one of the biggest European fan groups set up for the celebration of the Elvis Presley cult is situated in Duisburg, and there are lots of critics of their frequent meetings. Onefortyone (talk) 00:13, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Just read the topix forum. Yeah, it looks like the same contributor. Still, nothing wrong with that, but it suggests an agenda. I am going to remove the homoerotic reference; 141 didn't discuss its inclusion here before making such a significant change. Rikstar (talk) 13:24, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I am inclined to reinclude the quote, as Jailhouse Rock is one of the more important Elvis films and therefore needs some further comment, but I will leave it for now in order to show good faith. Onefortyone (talk) 00:36, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
 * personal opinions of authors on whether a dance and song is 'erotic' or 'homoerotic' is original research I'm afraid, and is not suitable or notable enough for inclusion into an encyclopedia Thisglad (talk) 01:13, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
 * It's not original research. According to peer-reviewed university studies, the dance sequence is indeed erotic or homoerotic. Brett Farmer wites that "the orgasmic gyrations of Elvis Presley and his band of male prisoners in the 'Jailhouse Rock' sequence from the 1957 film of the same name ... provide instances of a spectacular eroticization, if not homoeroticization, of the male image that is quite unusual in mainstream cinema." See Brett Farmer, Spectacular Passions: Cinema, Fantasy, Gay Male Spectatorships (Duke University Press, 2000), p.86. See also the other quotes I have given on this talk page. For interpretations of Jailhouse Rock from a gay perspective, see, for instance, Sheila Whiteley and Jennifer Rycenga, eds, Queering the Popular Pitch (2006), p.249; Jeffery P. Dennis, Queering Teen Culture (2006), p.70; Linda K. Fuller's study, Media-Mediated Relationships (1995), p.168, and Harry M. Benshoff, Queer Cinema: The Film Reader (2005), p.81. And if you watch the dance sequence, you will notice that there can be no doubt that the university researchers are right. Onefortyone (talk) 19:52, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

 * You clearly have a continuing agenda to add as much 'gayness' to Presley's image in this article as you can. I note the undiscussed addition of "drag queen" to the legacy section. This type of editing in inexcusable. And no, I'm not trying to whitewash the article - you are on a solo mission to sexually skew wikipedia articles and this should be resisted when other encyclopedic biographies do not mirror your views about Presley. Rikstar (talk) 06:19, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

 * Wow is this still going!? - Part of modern day culture I'm afraid Rikstar. There is a trend towards adding any number of famous people as gay to support a particular lifestyle. If writing a book on a subject means that references from that book satisfy WP:RS then they are valid (however much it seems like ) but....for balance the fact that he was hetro-sexual can also be 'supported'. It seems like it is still a case of put both sides and let the reader decide because we will never really know.--Egghead06 (talk) 07:17, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

 * Wow indeed, it still is going. Your comments, as ever, have been duly noted. Rikstar (talk) 18:49, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Acting career - Sight and Sound quote
Sight and Sound wrote that in his movies "Elvis Presley, aggressively bisexual in appeal, knowingly erotic, [was] acting like a crucified houri and singing with a kind of machine-made surrealism."

I propose removing the above quote. It - if it needs to be included - should be in a specialized article rather than a generalized section about his films in this biography. Rikstar (talk) 20:36, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

 * Agreed.Steve Pastor (talk) 22:38, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

 * I do not agree. You are trying to delete quotes from a reputed film magazine and from a university study presumably in order to whitewash the article. Sight & Sound has a more highbrow reputation than other film magazines. Every decade, the magazine asks an international group of film professionals to vote for their greatest film of all time. This is why Sight & Sound accolade has come to be regarded as "by far the most respected of the countless polls of great movies--the only one most serious movie people take seriously." The contemporary quote from Sight & Sound excellently describes how professional film critics judged Presley's qualities as an actor. As far as the other quote is concerned, Dr Brett Farmer is an expert on popular cultures and media, with special expertise in Hollywood film history, celebrity cultures and gender studies. His study, Spectacular Passions, published by Duke University Press, shows that Elvis made film history with the dance sequence in Jailhouse Rock. Therefore, Farmer's comment should also be mentioned in the article, especially since it is well sourced. Onefortyone (talk) 00:19, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

 * You are being disingenuous. The S and S quote has the kind of sexual terms you seem to be particularly fond of including; the quality of the source is quite irrelevant.

 * I wrote: Stick it in the article about Jailhouse Rock instead; the section here is about his acting career in general - not an analysis of his indivdual films. "Whitewash"?? I don't think so. There are no doubt other 'non-gay' quotes about the historic dance sequence in Jailhouse Rock; they could go in the film's article too. Rikstar (talk) 08:43, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

 * I do not understand your argument. Apart from being a famous singer and Rockabilly star, Elvis was primarily known as a sex symbol, and Colonel Parker exactly knew how he could use the movies to establish this image of his star for both male and female audiences. This is a historical fact. The nice quotes illustrate that the media in Elvis's time were well aware of the singer's sex appeal and that modern gender studies still deal with this important topic. The main Wikipedia article on Elvis should not ignore this point. Onefortyone (talk) 01:06, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Your 'gender study' observations have always been interesting regarding Presley. I particularly liked your talk page contribution of 08/27/07, quoting Jack Marx:

"Elvis was gay. He left messages all through his songs, outing himself to anyone who could hear, though the truth was hidden from the public in the lyrics that were published on his records and in fan magazines. Here's a few to hum in your head...

You know I can be found, sitting all alone If you can't call me, Ralph, at least please telephone... - Don't be Cruel

Love me tender, love me true, All my dreams for Phil... - Love Me Tender

When caught in a chap, I can't walk out... - Suspicious Minds

I'm into Richard, out in the hall... - Stuck On You

''Sure would be delighted with you pumping me, C'mon into the jailhouse, Rock, with me'' [emphasis added]... - Jailhouse Rock"... etc.

For some reason you haven't used the latter Jailhouse Rock lyric to bolster your views. Looks like ideal ammunition for your mission to alert the world about Presley's homoerotic/bisexual appeal. Could it be - and I'm guessing wildly here - that the quote YOU gave credence to by using it is in fact just a bunch of humorous crap that should never have been seriously quoted in the first place? Your credibility is permanently damaged by this in my eyes; you simply come across as someone with a rather sad and pitiful sexual agenda that ties up time - and frightens off worthy editors. Rikstar (talk) 05:45, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Instead of seriously discussing my objection in a rational fashion, you prefer to add some personal attacks to the current thread. Didn't you realize, Rikstar, that I never took these quotes from Jack Marx seriously? I only found them interesting and cited them on the talk page as one additional example in order to demonstrate how other people deal with the rumors of Presley's possible bisexuality or homosexuality on their internet sites and how the topic seems to be in people's minds. For possible inclusion in the Wikipedia article, I cited Kathleen Tracy's serious remarks in her Elvis biography: "It has since been speculated in Hollywood gossip that Presley and [his friend Nick] Adams may have shared some sort of intimate encounter. But there's no definitive evidence one way or another." See Significantly, you didn't cite this last passage of my contribution of August 27, 2007, and didn't explain what may be wrong with this quote. By the way, at the same time I also discussed many other topics concerning Elvis on the talk page. See, for instance, this contribution of August 27, 2007. This should be evidence enough that you are totally wrong in suggesting that I "simply come across as someone with a rather sad and pitiful sexual agenda that ties up time." I still do not understand your argument, and I am not yet convinced that well-sourced quotes from reputed film magazines and university studies are unimportant. Onefortyone (talk) 00:05, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

 * I have already made my objection twice "in a rational fashion", so here goes a third time: Stick it in the article about Jailhouse Rock instead; the section here is about his acting career in general - not an analysis of his indivdual films. You clearly have your own ideas about how important all this homoerotic stuff is, which I and others think is grossly exaggerated. I haven't called your comments not worthy of inclusion. But you, as stated, will no doubt reinstate the stuff you never discussed in the first place because you, and you alone, want it in there. You have a history of sexually oriented contributions that has gone beyond drawing attention to the significance of the comments themselves and begs big questions about the motivation and aims of the contributor. Those questions about what makes you persist with what is clearly a specific agenda - and how difficult it makes this article to edit - are not going to go away and nor should they. And let's not forget your own personal attacks on others, whom you regularly berate as biased "Elvis fans" determined to "whitewash" this article. This article is not overrun with such editors; just the ones who generally make straightforward, neutral edits and simply think you've gone over the top with your persistent homoerotic/sexual edits.

 * I'm glad you "only found [the Jack Marx lyrics] interesting"; it's the first I've seen you defend yourself, even though your use of the Jack Marx quotes has been criticized months ago. The subject of Presley's homosexuality is certainly in the minds of wikipedia users now, and we only have one contributor to thank for that. BTW, I did mention that: "There are no doubt other 'non-gay' quotes about the historic dance sequence in Jailhouse Rock", but you, as a self-proclaimed Elvis expert, only seem interested in the homoerotic observations. If there are going to be other comments/quotes on what is clearly a landmark film in rock'n'roll history, why as an "Elvis expert" do you only suggest 'gay' ones? If more suitable comments are added, the acting career section will skew in favor of Jailhouse Rock and the stuff will have to go in the film's article, which is what I suggested in the first place. QED. Rikstar (talk) 08:37, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry, Rikstar, most of your claims are unfounded. First, there is no overemphasis on gay topics in the present state of the Elvis article. It is not even mentioned that the star may have had homosexual leanings, and that one of his best friends was Nick Adams. Second, I have contributed to most sections of the article, dealing with his mother and father, the star's youth, his early stardom, his voice, his TV appearances, his movies, his interest in gospel music, his friends and relationships, his political beliefs, the singer's manager Parker, Elvis's stages in Las Vegas, his consumption of drugs, his death, the Elvis cult, etc. etc. Third, the inclusion of a well sourced quote mentioning that Elvis made film history with the dance sequence in Jailhouse Rock by providing "instances of a spectacular eroticization" (not only homoeroticization) of the male image (i.e. for both male and female audiences) is not an analysis of the film, Jailhouse Rock. It is just a short additional information why this movie is of more importance than others and had an immense influence on later productions. The Jailhouse Rock article certainly needs a more elaborated discussion of this point. Fourth, there was, and still is, a tendency to remove well-sourced contributions by Onefortyone simply because one or two users do not like them. Onefortyone (talk) 21:13, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

I seem to remember a group of people writing that the process seems to be working. Oh, and I see that the "article is too long" tag is still there. And, what ever happened to that bid for featured article status? Never mind, I already know the answer.Steve Pastor (talk) 22:42, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

 * Yes, that tag is annoying. Rikstar (talk) 10:41, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

 * Firstly, 141, I never claimed there is "overemphasis on gay topics in the present state of the Elvis article". I was talking about your contributions generally, especially in the talkpages. Secondly, your list of non-controversial contributions is irrelevant. Thirdly, as I have said before, there are probably dozens of other well-sourced comments about Jailhouse Rock that aren't about just the sex. Fourthly, naturally, like any decent editor, I will try to remove contributions that don't fit wikipedia's idea about a good, neutral, well-written featured article. The reason there is "no overemphasis on gay topics" in this article is because I and others have bust our guts over many hours to keep it that way. Rikstar (talk) 10:41, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

"Some wondered how the Motion Picture Production Code had been by-passed to allow a teenage idol to swear on the screen - I don't know what the hell you're talking about, or let a scene stay in that showed Elvis and Judy lying across a bed, fully clothed it's true, but neither one with the obligatory foot on the floor at the same time. Time magazine's critic (an inveterate Elvis - hater) concludes his attack with, 'For movie goers who may not care for the personalty, Presley himself offers in the film a word of consolation. Don't worry, he says, I'll grow on you. If he does, it will be quite a depressing job to scrape him off. In the same issue, Time writes despairingly about the whooping success of Jailhouse Rock's title song, whose moviebred lyrics of Jailhouse Rock suggest a powerful argument for penal reform...' Well, they had a point. Leiber and Stoller lyrics, such as: 'Number forty-seven said to number three, You're the cutest jailbird I ever did see. I sure would be delighted with your company, Come on and do the Jailhouse Rock with me'.

Certainly suggest what happens sexually to men cooped up together for long periods of time without women." (Source taken from Elvis and Gladys, by Elaine Dundy p.307 & 308). I remember reading and article of an interview with the writers of Jailhouse Rock, Leiber and Stroller, I carn't remember word for word, but to the effect that when they wrote the song for the movie, they hadn't yet met the star & like many people at the time, did't think much of him and wrote the lyrics as a bit of a joke. Keeping this in mind and Elaine Dundy's penchant for analysis of her subjects life and career, of the 21 pages about the movie Jailhouse Rock, she gave that topic only a few lines. I believe many view the lyrics and its contribution to the film as a whole to be a lighthearted reference to forced enviromental improvisation.--Jaye9 (talk) 12:46, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

 * Jay9, it seems Jailhouse Rock drew the attention of critics, and the enduring significance of some of their comments could easily be seen to equal or even surpass the importance of the Brett Farmer quote (above) once included by 141. I think the observations you have quoted would look very good in the film's article. I also remember an interview with Leiber and Stoller in which they referred to writing lyrics in a way that would go over the heads of most people, as a joke. Rikstar (talk) 10:35, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

 * There are indeed different interpretations. However, more recent sources, particularly gender studies, deal with the allusion to eroticism/homosexuality, which was rather progressive in those years. Even the reputed Rolling Stone magazine noted that there are parts of the lyrics that apparently represent talk about homosexual relationships between inmates. Some more quotes:
 * Sheila Whiteley and Jennifer Rycenga, eds, Queering the Popular Pitch (2006), p.249: "Elvis Presley's simulated pole-dancing in Jailhouse Rock (1957, dir. Richard Thorpe) ... provides a graphic insight into why he transcended mere identification with the performer's public image."
 * Jeffery P. Dennis in Queering Teen Culture (2006), p.70: "In "Jailhouse Rock" (1957) which became a hit after Elvis performed it in the movie of the same name, Elvis evokes a dance at the county jail, an all-male preserve, and specifies that prisoners vie for the most attractive dance partners..."
 * Toby Creswell, 1001 Songs: The Great Songs of all Time... (2006) is of somewhat different opinion (p.706): " 'Jailhouse Rock' was a difficult task. Presley wisely chose to avoid the gay innuendo of the lyrics and just rocked right over the top, aided by an incredible take from his guitarist Scotty Moore..."
 * MSN music says, "50 years later, it's still astonishing they got a song about gay sex in prison to the top of the charts." See
 * For interpretations of Jailhouse Rock from a gay perspective, see also Linda K. Fuller's study, Media-Mediated Relationships (1995), p.168, and Harry M. Benshoff, Queer Cinema: The Film Reader (2005), p.81. Several authors agree that the erotic dance sequence is the most important part of the film:
 * Billy Poore, Rockabilly: A Forty-Year Journey (1998), p. 20: "Elvis's dance sequence on the song "Jailhouse Rock" (which he choreographed himself) is considered by many as his greatest performance ever captured on film."
 * James Robert Parish and Michael R. Pitts, The Great Hollywood Musical Pictures (1992), p.337: "In the sequence in which he sang the title song, Elvis also executed a gyrating dance number with the other prisoners, the star having choreographed the impressive scene himself."
 * Sandra Choron and Harry Choron, The All-New Book of Lists for Kids (2002): "The dance sequence to the song "Jailhouse Rock" is one of the most memorable dance scenes in film."
 * Vinita, Biographies of Profiles in Popular Music (2007), p.17: "The grand dance sequence in the film had a group of professionals but Elvis matched them moving naturally, the way he did on stage under the choreography of Alex Romero. ... Elvis also made friends with the dancers like Russ Tamblyn." Onefortyone (talk) 23:27, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

TCB and TCB band?
I think that the TCB band, symbol, etc. merits having its own Wikipedia entry. However, I lack the knowledge to write it. I mention it here in hopes that someone can be spurred to do this. Migp (talk) 17:51, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Presley's alleged London visit -1958
This story has just broken in the UK. It hasn't been verified. There's a good deal of skepticism about it. Rikstar (talk) 00:13, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

 * To clarify the above comments: skeptics point to the fact that Presley was on active duty in Germany (from March 24, 1958 - he was making King Creole until then). If he had time off in the army, several, if not many, people would have known about or been involved (however clandestinely) in the arrangements to get him to and from England. And Elvis would have surely spoken of it to friends on his return?? Why no one has capitilized on this visit by spilling the beans in the last 50 years is a mystery - easily solved by suggesting it never happened. Unless there is corrobration from other, reliable, sources. At the moment, this 'revelation' does not really warrant a new section in this article. Rikstar (talk) 18:20, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Marty Lacker comments on Elvis toured London with Tommy Steele:

"Tommy Steele's claim that Elvis contacted him and spent a day in London with him is total bullshit.

"It seems Steele is just another person who has come out of the woodwork since Elvis died that has made false claims about themselves and Elvis. They think because he's gone they can get away with it, but they forget that we, the origianl guys who were close to him for 20 years and more, are still here. At least one of us and most times more, were with him just about everyday for all that time. Many days 24/7. We know what he did and who he did it with.

"Tommy Steele was never with Elvis in London because Elvis was never in London. The only time Elvis was in any part of Great Britain is when his army plane made a brief landing to refuel in Prestwick, Scotland on his way home from the army in Germany. Who Steele did meet is Lamar Fike, who says that he went to London back then while he was in Germany with Elvis. He went with a couple of guys and met Steele as part of a group. He spent a few hours with him and the others but he never went to Parliament as Steele claims or any other sightseeing tour with him."

Hope this sets the record straight for people. --Jaye9 (talk) 08:58, 26 April 2008 (UTC) Source: Elvis Informatin Network--Jaye9 (talk) 10:45, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

 * See Rikstar (talk) 10:58, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

 * Elvis' secret visit to London: Deep in the bowels of Area 51 where they preserve the TRUE FACTS about the REAL STORY behind EVERYTHING, there is a room devoted entirely to Elvis Presley. Mainly the files relate to the big truths about Elvis, how he's still alive, how he worked for both the CIA and the mafia and how his plans for a chain of Heartbreak Hotels were scuppered by a lawsuit from Trusthouse Forte. There is only one folder, however, that has particular pertinence this morning; the folder marked Elvis in Britain.

 * For the past 48 years the received wisdom has been that Elvis only set foot in the UK once, stopping at PrestwicK airport in 1960. He never left the airport, but told the locals he encounted. "This is quite a country. I must see more of it." He never did.

 * Yesterday on Ken Bruce's Radio 2 programme The Tracks of my Years, a shadowy account emerged of an alternate history, one in which Elvis made another trip to the UK two years previously. A trip to London in fact, where he was escorted round the capital by Tommy Steele, the bloke who sang Little White Bull.

 * The story was revealed by Bill Kenwright, theatre impresario and chairman of Everton football club, and despite knowing that his mate Tommy Steele doesn't like to talk about it, he didn't half go on at length... So not quite the missing link between Elvis, Marilyn and the moon landing then, but it's enough to persuade the Daily Mail to turn over page three to the tale,and send some hack to Woking's New Victoria theatre, where Steele is currently appearing in Doctor Dolittle, to ask the 71-year-old about his secret past.

 * In a written note to the papers, presumably slipped under the door after five hours of haranguing Steele revealed his disquiet at the revelation: "It was an event shared by two young men sharing the same love of their music and the same thrill of achieving something unimaginable.
 * "I swore never to divulge what took place and I regret that it has found some way of 'getting into the light'. I can only hope he can forgive me.

 * What do you mean, "can"? In the present tense? You don't mean to say...He couldn't possibly...Someone call the CIA! (Source: Paul MacInnes, Guardian, UK) --Jaye9 (talk) 10:03, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Gay Writer: Brian W. Fairbanks Perspective
Beautiful People: "Once it was established that a man could be a sex object, it was time to show he could be pretty, too. Androgyny in men would become a fact of life with the rise of rock and roll in the 50s. It was one thing for a flaming queen like Little Richard to cross the line segregating the genders, but even the overtly heterosexual Elvis Presley did some trespassing by wearing mascara and dressing in gold lame, the latter recommendation of Liberace, the entertainment world's most flamboyant fairy.

Following the example of Elvis and the rock and roll rebels he inspired, straight men broke free from the rigid dress code of earlier generations and started strutting their stuff without shame. Now, as men keep in shape with regular visits to health clubs (which their stogie smoking ancestors would have called a gym), the appreciation of male beauty is out of the closet as the gay men do much of the appreciating". Source: Date Info - The webzine of Date.com by Brian W. Fairbanks.

Brian W. Fairbanks has written alot of articles on Elvis as well as John Lennon, Bob Dylan etc. I think he is a bit of an Elvis Fan, don't hold that against him 141, the man just shows good taste. I personally think it's about the music, first and fullmost, the rest just follows,we are all human.

To User:Steve Pastor: amongst his many works, he has also written an article on The Ed Sullivan Show. Go to Brian W. Fairbanks -Writer on the web, if you care to have a look.--Jaye9 (talk) 13:16, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Later on fans
There were a couple of fans of Elvis Presley. Two boys named Andrew Scheib and Kushal Dhangauna introduced a boy named Rishi Haran to Elvis Presley. Kushal Dhangauna introduced Rishi one Elvis song Hound Dog. Andrew Scheib introduced Rishi another song Blue Suede Shoes. Then, Rishi saw music videos of Elvis on Youtube and soon, he loved Elvis. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.36.69.139 (talk) 20:04, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Edits from Banned User HC and IPs
1) and all of his sockpuppets are EXPRESSLY banned for life.

2) Be on the look out for any edits from these IP addresses:
 * AOL NetRange: 92.8.0.0 - 92.225.255.255
 * AOL NetRange: 172.128.0.0 - 172.209.255.255
 * AOL NetRange: 195.93.0.0 - 195.93.255.255

Early years
Jerry Hopkins' updated biog is essential reading as it was the first, and has been updated. It is unfortunate that LaraLove's wikiproject for this and other sections has not been followed. The content of Hopkins' biog is as valid as anyone else's and contains highly relevant information (positive and negative I might add). More to follow? Rikstar (talk) 18:45, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Jerry Hopkins has published best-selling biographies of Elvis and other stars such as Jim Morrison and Jimi Hendrix, and he was an editor and correspondent for Rolling Stone magazine. I see no problem quoting from this author's publications. However, in his book, Elvis: Prophet of Power, Samuel Roy says (p.121) about Hopkins's first biography of Elvis that, although at one time it "was considered a definite biography" ... it is clear that Hopkins does not have a good understanding of Elvis' talent. The most distasteful part of the book is Hopkins' great admiration for Colonel Parker." Roy adds that Hopkins's second book on Elvis was a "disappointment in almost every respect" and again proved that the author "understood neither Elvis the performer nor Elvis the man." Onefortyone (talk) 17:03, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

So Samuel Roy has an opinion. So does Jerry Hopkins. His books on Elvis have been combined and "thoroughly revised and updated", according to Jann Wenner, Rolling Stone founder. Rikstar (talk) 10:33, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Editorial Reviews

Elvis: The Biography by Jerry Hopkins(Author) Paperback - Sep 9,2007

"Jerry Hopkins long ago established the ground rules for serious biographical consideration of Elvis Presley. With a rare combination of seat-of-the-pants reporting and thoughtful portraiture,he creates a richly nuanced picture of a world in flux,both for Elvis himself and for the broad range of humanity that was - and continues to be - so indelibly affected by his music." - Peter Guralnick,author of Last Train To Memphis and ''Careless Love:The Unmaking of Elvis Presley ''--Jaye9 (talk) 06:06, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

As I said above, I see no problems quoting from Jerry Hopkins's books. Here are some quotes from the author's book, Elvis: the final years: However, the quality of the author's writing is not always as good as here. Hopkins's more recent book, Elvis in Hawaii (2002), a publication of less than 100 pages, is written for Elvis fans, filled with photographs and memorabilia collected from some fans and chronicling Elvis's time in Hawaii and his three Hawaiian movies. There can be no doubt that Elvis helped create Hawaii's modern image as a tourist destination, but his three movies in Hawaii - Blue Hawaii, ''Girls! Girls! Girls! and Paradise Hawaiian Style'' - are pretty bad. "When I did my first Elvis book, I interviewed 200 people and took hundreds of pages of notes and had to travel to different cities just to find out basic information," says Hopkins. "With the Internet, if I need to know the cast list and a synopsis of an Elvis movie, the information is available in seconds. I don't waste my time and can concentrate on actually writing." And he wrote the book in a few weeks. Onefortyone (talk) 16:19, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Elvis' health plummeted as his weight ballooned. Just how much weight he had put on, and how quickly, became apparent when he arrived at the University of Maryland on September 27th [1974]. So great was the change, some of the boys in the band had trouble recognizing him. Tony Brown, who had taken Briggs' place in the backup band, remembered watching Elvis arrive. "He fell out of the limousine to his knees," said Brown. "People jumped to help and he pushed them away, like, 'Don't help me!' He always did that when he fell. He walked onstage and held onto the mike for the first thirty minutes like it was a post. Everybody was scared." Guitarist John Wilkinson was standing a few feet away from Elvis. "The lights went down," he recalled, "and Elvis came up the stairs. He was all gut. He was slurring. He was so fucked up. It was obvious he was drugged, that there was something terribly wrong with his body. It was so bad, the words to the songs were barely intelligible. He could barely get through the introductions. We were in a state of shock. I remember crying. He cut the show short, yet it seemed like it went on forever."
 * [In January 1975] Elvis entered the hospital for, among other problems, an enlarged colon. At least that's what the press was told. And it was true. But it was also true that Elvis was there for another detoxification. ... The enlarged colon and drug detoxification were two serious problems treated during his three-week stay. Another more serious problem -- one never discussed publicly -- showed up in a liver biopsy. Later, Elvis would joke about the long needle that was stuck into his side to extract a sample of liver tissue, but the findings weren't at all amusing. There was severe damage to the organ, and it was clear to attending physicians that the probable cause was drug abuse.
 * Red and Sonny West and Dave Hebler explained Elvis' behavior another way. In their book, "Elvis: What Happened?," they tell of a sinister story about a plan Elvis had to kill the city's top narcotics dealers. They contend this is what kept Elvis holed up in his bedroom. Red said Elvis summoned him to his room, where he had a huge arsenal of automatic weapons, pistols, rifles and rockets strewn all over the floor. Elvis handed Red a list of names and a packet of photographs and implied that they'd been given to him by the Memphis police. "Elvis had it all planned," Red wrote. "He wanted myself and Dave Hebler and Dick Grob, the former cop [who had gone to work for Elvis some years earlier], to go out and lure them, and he said he was going to kill them."
 * At some concerts [in 1977], Elvis performed like an old man. At times it seemed he had only the loosest control of his voice and muscle coordination. He dropped lyrics, mumbled introductions and very nearly stumbled around the stage.
 * Linda Thompson recalls times she found him unconscious or unable to get his breath. Red and Sonny West tell of a time when a girl Elvis took to Palm Springs was hospitalized after they'd spent an evening swilling Hycadan, a codiene cough syrup. Elvis was an experimenter. Just as he wanted the newest automotive extravagance, he wanted the latest drug. The best and newest on the marketplace. Valium. Ethinamate. Dilaudid. Demerol. Percodan. Placidyl. Dexedrine. Biphetamine. Amytal. Quaalude. Carbrital. Cocaine hydrochloride. Ritalin. He had once turned to Red West's wife and said, "Pat, I've tried them all, honey, and believe me, Dilaudid is the best." Dilaudid is a painkiller usually given to terminal cancer patients.

 * So, Hopkins updated biog is a source worth using then. I'm glad we agree on that. Rikstar (talk) 18:14, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Linda Thompson
There is an important interview with Linda Thompson that is from CNN, when she was on Larry King's show. The transcript is here

http://www.elvis.com.au/presley/interview_lindathompson.shtml

The reason I am bringing this up is because I actually believed the Wiki article that he just wasn't very sexual with women, etc. Linda Thompson does say she did not sleep with him for a few months into the relationship, but then it did turn sexual, and she recalls their "romantic first night". She also states that he was faithful for about a year in their relationship and she said it was "some kind of record" (not exact quote, but she implied that he was not a monogamous type of person. Emotionally monogamous yes, but not physically monogamous.). She said that after that he was cheating on her with a lot of other women, ie having sex with them. She also states the reason why they broke up in the interview, and how, when they were breaking up, Elvis had another female in the room below their room, waiting for him (ostensibly to have sex with him).

I just want to note that I am personally not an Elvis fanatic, I am merely pointing this out, and I hope some other editor on this page uses this information. I realize there are bios of Elvis out there, but this is straight from Linda Thompson. Ruth E (talk) 03:08, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

EDIT: Here's the original CNN transcript http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0208/16/lkl.00.htmlRuth E (talk) 04:33, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Ruth E,thankyou so much for your recent comments,I am aware of this particular interview. I believe Linda Thompson along with her brother Sam Thompson are going to be writting a book about Elvis in the very near future. Linda Thompson is very well liked with the majority of fans and I have only heard favourable comments by many of Elvis's associates.

I have been editing on the Elvis talk page for only 3 months or so,but I really like the concept of Wikipedia,that it's a public domain and everyone can express their opinion,which at times can get heated,but that makes it all the more interesting and yes at times frustrating,but you can learn from it.

Of all the Elvis books out there and there are many,along with their contradictions,I could use that information and make Elvis look like a choir boy,ready for saint hood or a monster,if I so choosed,like most of us I believe he was neither,I go with somewhere in the middle. So my advise is don't believe everything you read,search around other sites as well and make up your own mind. I would like to site something I read from Joe Esposito that made sense to me and pertains to the subject your talking about. All the best to you.

"In certain ways,Elvis was a very unsophisticated man. He loved women,but he was not the super-sauve stud everyone thought he was. No one could live up to that image. Elvis slept with a lot of women,especially in the early days,but he couldn't have slept with every girl he dated." Source: Joe Esposito Good Rockin'Tonight p.182--Jaye9 (talk) 15:06, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

 * As a sex symbol, Elvis met several girls only for publicity reasons. It is unclear whether he actually had sex with most of the women he dated. His early girlfriends Judy Spreckels and June Juanico say that they had no sexual relationships with Presley. Juanico "recalls a time when she stood up to Elvis in front of his band of hangers-on, who even then were beginning to accompany him everywhere. He grabbed her arm, took her into the bathroom and declared: 'Look, you are so right, I am really sorry.' He kept her there for five minutes, then swaggered out, his image intact." Byron Raphael and Alanna Nash have stated that the star "would never put himself inside one of these girls..." and that "the so-called dangerous rock-and-roll idol was anything but a despotic ruler in the bedroom ..." During his military service, he had "discovered prostitutes and picked up the intense fear of sexually transmitted diseases which led to claims that he had a morbid fear of sexual penetration." See Tracy McVeigh, "Elvis Special: Love me tender." The Observer, Sunday August 11, 2002. Even the Memphis Mafia members didn't exactly know what was really going on in Elvis's bedroom. In most cases, when the girls who were waiting for the star were brought up to the singer's suite, Peter Guralnick writes, "Elvis would go in the other room, he'd go in the bedroom or somewhere, and then when they came back with the girls, the girls would sit there for maybe ten or fifteen minutes, and finally one of the cousins would go in the bedroom and come out himself and another ten minutes would go by - and then in would come Elvis. And there would be like a silence, and then the cousins would say, 'Oh, Mary Jane, this is Elvis,' and the girls would be totally gone." Does this sound as if he was very interested in these girls? I don't think so. Guralnick further says that "For the more experienced girls it wasn't like with other Hollywood stars or even with other more sophisticated boys they knew. They offered to do things for him, but he wasn't really interested. What he liked to do was to lie in bed and watch television and eat and talk all night - the companionship seemed as important for him as the sex," and it seems as if he only occasionally had sexual intercourse. In his later years, six months after Priscilla left, Elvis dated beauty queen Linda Thompson. Although she was a virgin when they met, it has been claimed that they "started with marathon love-making sessions in Vegas hotel rooms." See Tracy McVeigh, "Elvis Special: Love me tender." The Observer, Sunday August 11, 2002. This is contradicted by Thompson's own statement above that she did not sleep with Elvis for a few months into the relationship. There can be no doubt that she shared Presley's passion for gospel music and higher religious understanding, moved into Graceland in August 1972 and remained the singer's steady companion for roughly three and a half years. For more details, see also Connie Kirchberg and Marc Hendrickx, Elvis Presley, Richard Nixon, and the American Dream, p.109-110. However, their relationship "disintegrated into a sexless and gloomy existence." According to Thompson, "There were times when he was very, very, difficult. There was a lot of heartache and he exhibited a lot of self-destructive behaviour, which was very difficult for me, you know, watching someone I loved so much destroy himself." In 1976, she left Presley as Elvis wanted her to. "Some doubt he ever had sex again," and his "Fiancee" beauty queen Ginger Alden, the woman Elvis had planned on marrying and who found Elvis's lifeless body on August 16th, 1977, "is too polite to say." See McVeigh, "Elvis Special" The Observer, Sunday August 11, 2002. Onefortyone (talk) 16:28, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

 * Well, I can 'live with' Presley not being overtly active, sexually. But if there are sources that claim otherwise, they should be included. Rikstar (talk) 19:27, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

As you can see above User:141's test is quite large,so the only way I can clearly dicipher it,it to write it in sections,along with my responding comments.

141 writes:Bold text As a sex symbol,Elvis met serveral girls for publicity reasons. It is unclear whether he actually had sex with most of the womem he dated. Judy Spreckles and June Juanico say that they had no sexual relationship with Presley. Juanico "recalls a time when she stood up to Elvis in front of his band of hangers on,who even then were beginning to accompany him everywhere. He grabbed her arm,took her into the bathroom and declared."Look" your so right,I am really sorry. He kept her there for five minutes,then swaggerd out,his image intact.

Responding Comments: Early in Elvis's career,Elvis's manager Colonel Tom Parker would have wanted Elvis to be seen and photographed with many different women and incoureged Elvis to do so,this was all to make him look available to his predommantly female audience,so they would buy his records. In the early days Colonel Parker did not want Elvis to get married or appear to have a serious girlfriend,such as the case with June Juanico. In her book ,June Juanico comments about her dislike for Colonel Parker for this reason. As for 141 comments about Judy Spreckles and June Juanico,Judy Spreckles was a friend,as for June Juanico relationship with Elvis goes,here's a bit of what she had to say about that.

"Though he still occasionally saw Dixie Locke and had a new sophisticated Memphis girlfriend named Barbara Hearn,Presley embarked on a madcap summer romance with June,of which Gladys approved. But,in a whisper,she warned her son,"You just better not let Colonel Parker know how serious you are about June. You know how he feels,especially about marriage."

"The advice was par of Glady's tragic attempt to regain control of the boy. Gladys was determined to get him married and settled near her. The Colonel was equally determined that Elvis maintain his image of a rock'n'roller who was "available" to the legions of girls filling the concert stands. The Colonel wouldn't even sanction a steady girlfriend.

"Celestrial bodies weren't all Elvis was interested in. He desperately wanted to have sex with June,who adamantly refused."

As Juanico noted five decades later,"It was another time,another sensibility. There were alot of virgins running around including me. She had her suspicions about Elvis,as well. "I had the feeling he really hadn't been around all that much,because he was so gentle". They were both apprehensive. The big fear then,reminded June,was pregnacy and if you got pregnant you got married.

She did allow him to kiss her passionately. And they engaged in serious and creative foreplay. '''Source: "Down At The End Of Lonely Street" by Peter Harry Brown and Pat H.Broeske. P.84 & 85'''--Jaye9 (talk) 03:46, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

 * I like your commentaries, Jaye9, as you are citing your sources. However, the claim that Elvis "desperately wanted to have sex with June, who adamantly refused," is somewhat contradicted by June Juanico's own version of the story. She had met Presley for the first time after one of his early concerts in Biloxi in 1955, when he was on the verge of the superstardom. Indeed, she seems to have been the only girl Elvis's mother ever approved of. However, Elvis didn't let this romance get too intimate. In a 1997 interview with the San Francisco Chronicle, she swears that she never had sex with Presley. "I was tempted to, oh, yeah. But I was a virgin and the times were different back then." In the same interview, she also "blames his manager, Colonel Tom Parker, for encouraging Presley to go out with beautiful women for the publicity." According to Elvis biographer Peter Guralnick, Juanico didn't doubt that Elvis loved her, but "she didn't know if she could ever get him back," because on one of their dates the singer was always talking about his best friend, gay actor Nick Adams. "He started telling her all about Nick and Nick's friends and Jimmy Dean, but she didn't want to hear." Onefortyone (talk) 15:01, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

2nd Section

User 141 writes: Byron Rahphael and Alana Nash have stated the star "would never put himself inside on of these girls" and that the so-called dangerous rock-and-roll idol was anything but a despotic ruler in the bedroom..."  Responding Comments:

It is to my understanding that Alana Nash is a writer for Penthouse Magazine and was assigned to interview and write Byron Raphel's intriguing little story,that is all,that's what a writer does. A story is only as reliable as it's source.

Alana Nash did however write a very highly acclaimed and respected book "Elvis and the Memphis Mafia" with Billy Smith,Marty Lacker and Lamar Fike,a much more reliable source indeed. It is to be noted Marty Lacker and Lamar Fike have critized Byron Raphael in interviews,for his exaggerated claims eg: the Marilyn Monroe Affair etc. The funniest won I heard was Byron Raphel claiming that Elvis was well endowed in the private area,it's even more funnier that Elvis nicknamed it Little Elvis, go figure. This source is just to silly for words. Byron Raphael was not even mentioned in the updated "Elvis and the Memphis Mafia" book,showing him total contempt and rightfully so.--Jaye9 (talk) 05:25, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

 * Some clarifications. Byron Raphael was a William Morris agent and there can be no doubt that he worked with both Elvis and Colonel Parker at the beginning of the singer's career. He is frequently cited as a reliable source in books by reputed Elvis biographer, Alanna Nash. By the way, journalist Nash is only occasionally contributing to Playboy and Penthouse Magazine, as many other reputable writers do. Here are some of Raphael's comments about the claim that Elvis never talked about the incidents to the guys from the Memphis Mafia:
 * "Lamar Fike said to Alanna Nash that Elvis turned Marilyn down. So, he admitted that he was not there that night. But, he admitted that something was happening. The other guys said no, it never happened. But Lamar, who was the first guy there; well, I was the first guy. There was no Lamar. When I got there it was just before the Army. There was no Joe Esposito or Marty Lacker or Sonny and Red West. They were not there. There was just Gene and Cliff and myself. But, Lamar admitted that. They turned it around because they always protected Elvis, but that was good."
 * "The guys like Joe Esposito and Marty Lacker and Gene Smith's cousin Billy (Stanley), they want the world to think that they were the ones with Elvis when first came to Hollywood, because they're so territorial they feel the part of the social glamour that was Elvis Presley reflected on them. So they want people to think they were there with Elvis when he came to Hollywood. But, it's really not true. That's why they try to dis-credit me. They couldn't do it too much 'cause there were too many affidavits from the Colonel that included me and talked about me, that can't be faked. You can't fake that type of typewriter. They don't make that type of typewriter anymore. And the Colonel's signature was on them. In fact, they wrote a letter to Playboy saying none of it's true, but Playboy refused to print it. If you noticed, they never printed any letter from Elvis' friends denying it, although they wrote it. Elvis' guys wrote it, denying that I even worked for Elvis and the Colonel."
 * "There's one other guy, Trudi Forsher's son, Jim Forsher, who is a professor at the University in San Francisco, who remembers so well and has sent me the documents that his mother kept which included me. He remembers. He will verify. He was eight years old and to him, I was like an idol. His mother is Elvis' secretary and here I am a young man hanging out with Elvis. His memories of that are very clear.
 * "Billy Stanley claims that he was there. When Gladys Presley died, Vernon re-married to a woman by the name of Dee Stanley. So, Billy became his step-brother. But, when I was there, Gladys was very much alive. So, people who say they were there, are lying. I understand their lie, because they did spend most of their life with Elvis. I was there for three years, four years. They gave up their wives, they gave up their lives to be with Elvis. So, I understand why they want to say they were there all the time. During the really great years when he first exploded, I was the one who was there. There was no Joe Esposito. Lamar did come the second year. Even Alanna (Nash) when she would talk to him, he would say "Say hello to Byron for me." There was no way he could deny it. In fact, he didn't want to deny it, up until the Playboy story came out. He didn't like that so much. But, the other guys just weren't there." Onefortyone (talk) 15:01, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Third Section

User:141 writes: During his military service,he had "discovered prostitutes and picked up the intense fear of transmitted deseases which led to claims that he had a morbid fear of sexual penetration. "See Tracey Mcveigh, "Elvis Special: Love Me Tender" The Observer,Sunday August 11,2002

My Response:

I just read "Elvis Special:Love Me Tender" by Tracey McVeigh The Observer,Sunday August 11,2002 Not a bad article in it's entirety,the lady appears to have used quite alot of her information from the book "Down At The End Of Lonely Street" by Peter Harry Brown and Pat.H Broeske. However she did make a comment that got me wondering. Talking about things in it's entirety,141 writes in the first section I have written from this very article "Jaunica recalls a time when she stood up to Elvis in the front of his band of hangers on,who even then where beginning to occampany him everywhere. He grabbed her arm,took her into the bathroom and declared "Look" your so right,I'm really sorry. He kept her there for five minutes,then swaggered out,his image intact."

Here's how the paragraph reads from the "Elvis Special: Love Me Tender" article.

'Elvis was a very sensitive person,very tender,but on the outside he was very macho,' she says. An outspoken and fiesty teenager,June recalls a time when she stood up to Elvis in front of his band of hangers on,who even then were beginning to accompany him everywhere. He grabbed her,took her into the bathroom and declared. "Look you are so right,I am really sorry. He kept her there for five minutes then swaggered out,his image intact.

My question to you 141,you're not one for short edits,why did you leave the first sentences out,don't you like sentences that use the word macho in them, to describe Elvis? After all these two sentences were the first part of the paragraph.

 * It is well known that Elvis dressed as a macho wearing leather outfits, as he imitated his idol, Marlon Brando. So why should there be a problem mentioning this fact in the article or elsewhere? By the way, the Sexuality section of the Marlon Brando article (not written by me) is a good example of how other Wikipedians handle controversial topics. Onefortyone (talk) 15:13, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Getting back to what 141 mentions about prostitutes,transmitted deseases and claims about fear of sexual penetration,here are some sources that discuss these subjects.

"According to deejay Bill Randle,some of the very well developed young women who congregated backstage at Elvis's shows latter cuddled with him inside his parked car. "There was alot of activity in that car," recalled Randle,adding,"Elvis was a highly sexed young guy - a randy rooster."

 * We all know that cuddling is not having sexual intercourse. However, there are many other stories concerning Elvis's attitudes towards young women. In Elvis in Hawaii, your favorite author, Jerry Hopkins writes (p.4 and 6): "Velma Fisher remembers a young woman on the ship who said she had to meet Elvis. Velma took her to his cabin and knocked. The door opened. Elvis pulled the girl inside. The door closed. (Velma later said that when the ship arrived in Hawaii the young woman came up to her in tears. Elvis had rejected her.)" According to Peter Harry Brown and Pat H.Broeske, Dorothy "Dottie" Harmony, a Las Vegas dancer who also dated Presley during that period, recalled dates in which religion was the topic of discussion. "I'm not kidding. We read the Bible aloud together." Mary Ann Mobley, former Miss America and Elvis's co-star in Harum Scarum and Girl Happy, sensed that Elvis led a double life away from the sound stages. "You have to understand that no one really cared about him, except to keep him working." Onefortyone (talk) 17:05, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

"In the beginning he was sexually naive. Sam Phillips likes to tell the time a flusted twenty-one-year-old Elvis showed up at his home to anxiously confess,"Mr Phillips,ahh,Mr Phillips,I got somethin I'm just worried to death about." With that Elvis dropped his pants to reveal a festering sore just above his pubic hair. "He thought he had syphilis," said Phillips,who went on to chagnose Elvis's "risen" as a "carbumcle boil"(later,lanced by a physician). Source: "Down At The End Of Lonely Street" by ''Peter Harry Brown and Pat H. Broeske p.54

The above comment shows Elvis was concerned about deseases way back then. I was going to site more information,don't get me wrong I am pretty open minded,but I'm finding this all just a little perverse. I'll move on to the next section. I'm just trying to makeing a point to all this.--Jaye9 (talk) 11:01, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

 * Thanks for the additional information. Some further quotes. Like other Elvis biographies, Brown's and Broeske's book, Down At The End Of Lonely Street, clearly indicates that Elvis was more interested in male than in female friendship. Concerning the Memphis Mafia, the authors write: "the singer said he needed to be entertained. The entourage was growing both in number and in clownish visibility, becoming as ubiquitous as Presley, who often found himself defending them. 'I get lonely and these fellow spell home to me,' he explained." In the Beverly Wilshire Hotel, "Elvis and his Memphis cohorts took over an entire wing -- four bedrooms, a living room, dining room and den. Suite 850 became one of the town's legendary bachelor pads -- and the royal headquarters for a young man who was fast becoming the screen's newest king." "Natalie Wood showed up several times, once to threaten suicide. 'We started calling her the Mad Nat ... she was nuttier than a fruitcake,' said Lamar Fike, who joined the entourage in 1957. He was on hand the time Wood climbed out on the window ledge and began babbling about committing suicide over Elvis. 'What do we do, boss?' asked the frightened Fike. 'Screw it!' said Elvis. 'She ain't gonna jump.' After a half hour, Wood climbed sheepishly back through the window. 'I told you she wasn't gonna do anything,' Elvis snorted." "A veritable who's who of the town's hip names made the pilgrimage to Suite 850. Vince Edwards, then a rising young actor, was a regular. Glenn Ford showed up. Sammy Davis Jr. -- one of Elvis's favorites -- once gave an impromptu performance in the living room. Nick Adams and his crowd also came around. Adams was sometimes so antic that some Presley associates wondered if the young actor was taking drugs. June Juanico, whose relationship with Elvis had ended after the filming of Love Me Tender, frankly wonders if Adams was the one who introduced Elvis to drugs. Juanico, who was at the Presley home during Adams's visits, said, 'There is no question in my mind but that Nick was wired at the time. I mean, wired.' Though Juanico never saw Presley become similarly 'wired,' she speculates that his gradual descent may have been prompted by his early Hollywood associations." Onefortyone (talk) 15:01, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

141 thankyou for your responding comments and excuse me if I don't address them right now,I'm not ignoring you,I'm just going to finish with what I started out to do.--Jaye9 (talk) 22:30, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

 Fourth section

User: 141 writes: Even the Memphis Mafia members didn't exactly know what was really going on in Elvis's bedroom. In most cases,when the girls were waiting for the star were bought up to the singers suite,Peter Guralnick writes "Elvis would go in the other room,he'd go in the bedroom or somewhere,and then when they came back with the girls,the girls would sit there for maybe ten or fifteen minutes and finally one of the cousins would go in the bedroom and come out himself and another ten minutes would go by and then would come Elvis. And there would be silence,and then the cousins would say,'Oh,Mary Jane,this is Elvis,and the girls would be totally gone." Does this sound as if he was very interested in these girls? I don't think so.

My Response

141,you write "Even the Memphis Mafia Members didn't exactly know what was really going on in Elvis's bedroom. In most cases,when the girls who where waiting for the star were brought up to the singers suite,"

How would they know what was going on in Elvis's bedroom,they weren't in the bedroom with him,

 * So if they didn't know what was really going on in Elvis's bedroom, what about the false claims that Elvis had full sex with most of the girls? Many of these girls say they were only talking, watching TV or reading the Bible in Elvis's bedroom. Onefortyone (talk) 12:40, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

then you say,"In most cases,when the girls who where waiting for the star were bought up to the singers suite," You know this yourself do you? As I've said before you not won for short edits, then why did you leave out the first two sentences out of that paragraph you quoted from Peter Guralnick's book? Reading that paragraph you used from Gurlanick's book and your final personal view of "Does this sound as if he was very interested in these girls? I don't think so." I don't quite see your point.

Here are the first two sentence you choose to leave out of that paragraph from Peter Gurlanick's book,"He wasn't really serious about anyone for the time being,though. He was engaging the single life,and when he got bored he just had to tell the guys to hunt up some girls in the Lobby of the hotel. He would have them bought up to the suite,offered one observer"

Just two paragraphs before Peter Gurlanick writes: "In the evenings they would go to the movies sometimes,the whole gang of them,it was,according to Vince Edwards,like "The Clan of the Beverley Wilshire full of cousins and him. "When we got to the theater,'said Russ Tamblyn. We all got out and bought our tickets and formed a line. Now by this time a crowd has formed,you know,they'd see all these strange-looking characters get out of the cars and wonder,who the hell is this,so if there wasn't a problem before,there is now. Anyway,there would be two lines right up to the ticket taker,and Elvis would be the last one,or if he had a girlfriend,the girlfriend would come out with him,and Elvis would go right between the two lines,and everybody would be blown away they'd just move back. I always thought Elvis loved the entourage,and he loved playing the part-he seemed to have an instinct for entrances."

Reading this paragraph and the one you quoted,as it flows in,I believe that the author was pointing out that Elvis liked making entrances,whether he was out in public or in his private life,that's all. But then we all see things differently I guess.--Jaye9 (talk) 06:32, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

 * Thanks for the additional quotes. They clearly show that Elvis "was engaging the single life," primarily "loved the entourage" and spent most of his time with the members from the Memphis Mafia, the whole gang watching movies, going to the theater, etc. A few paragraphs before Guralnick also relates that they went out to Russ Tamblyn's "beach house one or two more times" [i.e., a small, one-bedroom beach house on the Pacific Coast Highway just south of Topanga Canyon, where Elvis came with his best friend Nick Adams, all of his cousins, hangers-on and some girls]. Elvis even asked if he could rent that house "for the next couple of months" in order to spend much time there with Nick and the Memphis Mafia members. It seems as if he was not very interested in the many girls who admired him. In most cases, he was accompanied by some girls only for publicity reasons. As you said: "Elvis's manager Colonel Tom Parker would have wanted Elvis to be seen and photographed with many different women and encouraged Elvis to do so, this was all to make him look available to his predominantly female audience, so they would buy his records." Sometimes, when he felt bored with the many males around him, he was looking for female company and they could talk all night long. Only occasionally they also might have had sex, as a few girls have claimed in order to achieve some personal fame. That's all. Onefortyone (talk) 12:40, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Fifth Section

Evertime I write the word section,Im typing in Sextion by mistake,do you think it may be some sort of fruedien slip perhaps 141,just kidding,I think I just getting a little tied. I am trying to be as honest & open with you as I can and I'm reading your responses and you appear to be twisting everthing I say around,maybe it's communicating on the internet that's the problem,I'm not use to it,I as a rule talk to people face to face. People can interperat things differantly sometimes, I can appreciate that,but if your playing some sort of little game here,please don't do it with me,I just want to try and help where I can to make this a good article okay.

User: 141 writes: Gurlanick further says "For the more experienced girls it wasn't like with other Hollywood stars or even more sophistacted boys they new. They offered to do things for him,but he wasn't really interested. What he liked to do was lie in bed and watch television and eat and talk all night - the companionship seemed as important for him as the sex" and it seems as if he only occassionally had intercourse.

My Response

141,remember when I first came on the Elvis Talk Page and you sited this very paragraph from Peter Gurlanick and I said In response to the recent comments made by User:141 dated 13th December 2007. Taken from Peter Gurlanick Last Train To Memphis p.415. There are just a few more sentences that follow after what 141 quoted in the same paragraph. It reads: "-the companionship seemed as important for him as the sex---and in the early morning hours they would make love. "He had an innocience at the time," said one of them. "Im sure it didn't last."

And I said does this not pertain to the text also.

In your response to what I said,you never explained why you did that,you just quoted the next paragraph from Peter Gurlanick's book etc. By you leaving those few sentences out,to me it was like you slammed on the brakes,it looked very strange. This time however you did go a little further and say "the companionship seemed as important for him as the sex" then you put the brakes on again and you didn't  write "---and then in the early hours they would make love. "He had an innocience at the time," said one of them "Im sure it didn't last.

But instead you finish with "and it seems as if he only occassionly had intercourse." I'm sorry 141 leave these statements out and you finish with what you said,it comes across to me a selective referencing,all part of you agenda pushing plan or just plain sniggering,maybe I wrong,but then I only you know that answer.--Jaye9 (talk) 15:24, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

 * You certainly do have a personal agenda, namely, to discredit my contributions. On the one hand, you claim that you are "trying to be as honest & open" with me as you can. On the other hand, you have accused me of "twisting everthing you say around" and "playing some sort of little game here" (see ), although I am seriously discussing the sources concerning Elvis's relationships, as anyone can see. You said, "have a look at what User:141 has done with his recent information and how he delivers it in a certain way,or should I say to appear in a certain way. ... just by using certain information,piecing it together,I can make Elvis be what ever I want him to be. This is called selective referencing." And you added what you "plan to do is dissect this information section by section with the authors involved and put it into its rightful perspective once and for all." See . You said elsewhere, "this gentleman's information, I believe needs to be looked at and how he interprets that information back into this article. Well I got that of my chest." See . And you again emphasized that you endeavor to "put things into a little of perspective" on the Elvis talk page. See . This means that you are not assuming good faith as far as my contributions are concerned and that you are engaged in putting things into the right (i.e. your) perspective. You could also have said, it's fine that Onefortyone has used so many different sources in order to support his contributions, as this is what Wikipedia expects. Notwithstanding, it is your right to discuss controversial topics on the talk page from your personal point of view. You also said: "Of all the Elvis books out there and there are many,along with their contradictions,I could use that information and make Elvis look like a choir boy,ready for saint hood or a monster,if I so choosed,like most of us I believe he was neither,I go with somewhere in the middle. So my advise is don't believe everything you read,search around other sites as well and make up your own mind." See . Therefore, I appreciate that you have cited some reliable sources, as I frequently do, in order to support your contributions.
 * Let us now take a look at your argument. The whole paragraph we are talking about runs as follows:
 * He was still seeing Yvonne Lime occasionally, but he was dating Anne Neyland, a former Miss Texas whom he had met on the MGM lot, and Venetia Stevenson, too, when a rumor that he was about to marry Yvonne in Acapulco broke at the end of May. "When I get married," he told the press, after the Colonel 's official denials, "it'll be no secret. I'll get married in my hometown of Memphis, and the whole town'll be there." He wasn't really serious about anyone for the time being, though. He was enjoying the single life, and when he got bored he just had to tell the guys to hunt up some girls in the lobby of the hotel. He would have them brought up to the suite, offered one observer, "and Elvis would go in the other room, he'd go in the bedroom or somewhere, and then when they came back with the girls, the girls would sit there for maybe ten or fifteen minutes, and finally one of the cousins would go in the bedroom and come out himself and another ten minutes would go by - and then in would come Elvis. And there would be like a silence, and then the cousins would say, 'Oh, Mary Jane, this is Elvis,' and the girls would be totally gone." For the more experienced girls it wasn't like with other Hollywood stars or even with other more sophisticated boys they knew. They offered to do things for him, but he wasn't really interested. What he liked to do was to lie in bed and watch television and eat and talk all night -- the companionship seemed as important for him as the sex -- and in the early morning hours they would make love. "He had an innocence at the time," said one of them. "I'm sure it didn't last." But what he really wanted was to have a relationship, to have company. He was very clean-cut about it. There were a lot of things that he didn't like. And another thing that you could not do around him was mention drugs, he was dead set against it."
 * Parts of this paragraph represent Guralnick's conclusions. However, these conclusions are supported by the sources the author has used. What is said in this paragraph?
 * Elvis dated some girls (and this seems to have been published in the tabloid newspapers; otherwise we would not have known). I would add that the singer did this most probably for publicity reasons, as the Colonel had recommended, because Guralnick has added that Elvis "wasn't really serious about anyone for the time being" (this means including the girls).
 * There were rumors that he was going to marry one of the girls, but this was officially denied both by the Colonel and Elvis. This further shows that the dates cannot be taken serious.
 * Elvis was enjoying the single life. What this means, Guralnick explains on the previous pages and elsewhere in the book, is that Elvis "loved the entourage" and spent most of his time with Nick Adams and the members from the Memphis Mafia, the whole gang watching movies, going to the theater, etc. A few paragraphs before Guralnick also relates that they went out to Russ Tamblyn's beach house, etc., and he writes that Elvis and his guys were all "living on speed and tranqs." They went to different shows every night and were partying all night. "We'd stay there and never sleep, we were all taking pills just so we could keep up with each other."
 * It is further said that when Elvis "got bored" (with his single life or the male company?) "he just had to tell the guys to hunt up some girls in the lobby of the hotel." However, it is very significant that the singer was not very interested in them. Even when they were there they had to wait ten or fifteen minutes and another ten minutes for the star.
 * This is followed by the most important part of the text: " For the more experienced girls it wasn't like with other Hollywood stars or even with other more sophisticated boys they knew. They offered to do things for him, but he wasn't really interested. This is a clear statement. Other sources, among them eyewitness accounts by several girls, also say that Elvis primarily liked to lie in bed and watch TV and eat and talk all night. This certainly means that the companionship was more important than having sex with these girls, although Guralnick claims that "in the early morning hours they would make love." Query: how should the author or the members from the Memphis Mafia know whether they actually made love in the bedroom? Both Elvis and the girls must have been very tired early in the morning after talking or reading the Bible or philosophical books all night long. Only occasionally this might have been the case, as Anne Helm stated that they had sex, relating that they "played cards into the early-morning hours, when Presley would ask her to slip into a flouncy, yellow baby-doll nightie he had bought her." Perhaps this was the source Guralnick had in mind. However, most girls say it didn't happen, as Elvis was too innocent at that time. For instance, in her memoir, Breathing Out (2005), Peggy Lipton says that Presley was like a "teenage boy". "He didn't feel like a man next to me -- more like a boy who'd never matured." When he tried to make love with Lipton, "he just wasn't up to sex. Not that he wasn't built, but with me, at least, he was virtually impotent." Therefore, it is not necessary to cite the entire paragraph from Guralnick's book in the Wikipedia article, as the author's claim that "in the early morning hours they would make love" (a statement presumably based on a single source such as Anne Helm) is contradicted by several other sources.
 * Guralnick significantly adds: "But what he really wanted was to have a relationship, to have company. He was very clean-cut about it." This is what Elvis really wanted: to have company, not sex. The author emphasizes: "There were a lot of things that he didn't like." This clearly means that Guralnick is of the opinion that Elvis didn't like sex (among other things).
 * It is a fact that modern researchers question whether Elvis had actually sex with most of these girls. Therefore, the many eyewitness accounts by women who say that they didn't make love are so important. They all support the view that Elvis only occassionly had sexual intercourse with the girls. However, a short reference to the Anne Helm story may be included in the text for reasons of balance. I hope this is satisfactory to you and Rikstar who said, "I can 'live with' Presley not being overtly active, sexually. But if there are sources that claim otherwise, they should be included." See . Onefortyone (talk) 19:10, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Just recently have woke up this morning to find your recent response,I'm absolutely speechless,the only thing I can think of to say to you is thankyou for sharing that with me.--Jaye9 (talk) 21:31, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

141,I have just had a chance to calm down a bit,just a bit since this morning. Let me explain something to you if I may,I chose to dissect your recent edits, section by section,because I didn't agree with what you said and wanted to explain why,that is what I have chosen to do and something that is important to me. However,I have spent 18 hrs research on this so far, because if I have a problem with what you say,I have to back it up and it hasto be thorough and accurate as It can be. I thought I would have this finished by now. However reality sets in and I have to go to work and do 14hr a days for the next three weeks.

You said in your last response to me,that I have accused you of twisting things around,selective referencing etc. Yes I did, because that is how I genuinely see it. You also mentioned that my doing so,was showing bad faith,as you put it not the Wikipedia way. May I remind you that you also have called me an Elvis fan,which I am,but as I see it,spoken by you in a way that appears to be used in the most derogatory of terms. I've been called a sock puppet,which I am most definetely not. That my comments of past have been amusing and funny,which I find are both belittling and discouraging. But that's okay then isn't it,one rule for you and another rule for everybody else,is that how it's going to be. This is why I think that this article is stagnet and will continue to be fo god knows how long.

 * You forgot to mention that I also said that I like your contributions, as you are citing your sources, and that it is your right to discuss controversial topics on the talk page from your personal point of view. However, it is also true that you are not "trying to be as honest & open" with me as you can, as you are clearly arguing from a fan's point of view, endeavoring to demonstrate that Elvis was a womanizer. Onefortyone (talk) 01:01, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Here's what I'm going to do,to show good faith. Two things,firstly I've decided to have three weeks timeout from what I'm doing on the Elvis Talk Page, because of work commitments and also if I don't do this ,I may very well blow my fuse with you and I don't want to do that. Secondly,I will however cite a paragraph that you wrote today,that I have a problem with,there are more but I am a little pressed for time at this point. Isn't this partly what the talk page is for? to sort out problems with the article. With that I will endeavour to continue these discussions with you in three weeks,see if we can work it out,for the better of this article and for it's readers. Keeping in mind 141, that what ever I say is not against you personally,I would like you to believe that,as I wouldn't be spending all these hours citing my sources. I would just say something like your wrong onefortyone and that your an Elvis hater,well that would be productive,not. See you in three weeks.--Jaye9 (talk) 12:02, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

 * You are certainly an Elvis fan, and that's O.K., but I am not an Elvis hater. However, I do not primarily see Elvis as a mega star. From a more critical point of view, I tend to lay more emphasis on the artist's personal problems that deeply affected his career and led to his early death. Onefortyone (talk) 01:01, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Jaye9, it is unfortunate, but wholly predictable, that you would be accused of being a sockpuppet and that you would be referred to disparagingly as an "Elvis Fan" (we've all been there). 141 has his own agenda. Do not take his comments to heart. Rikstar (talk) 20:31, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

See Onefortyone(talk)18 May 2008

First Section

User: 141 writes: This is followed by the most important part of the text. ("For the more experienced girls it wasn't like with other Hollywood stars or even with other more sophisticated boys they new. They offered to do things for him,but he wasn't really interested") This is a clear statement. Other sources,among these eyewitness accounts by several girls,also say that Elvis primarily liked to lie in bed and watch TV and eat and talk all night. This certainly means that the companionship was more important then having sex with these girls,although Gurlanick claims that "in the early morning hours they would make love." Query: how should the author or the members of the Memphis Mafia know whether they actually made love in the bedroom? Both Elvis and the girls must have been tired after talking or reading the Bible or phitoshical books all night long."

My Response

141 writes: "This is followed by the most important part of the text. ("For the more experienced girls it wasn't like with other Hollywood stars or even with other more sophisticated boys,they new. They offered to do things for him,but he wasn't really interested") This is a clear statement."

I think what the author was trying to point out,of the girls he met,if they were experienced he didn't go off with them. 141,let's look at the time period the author is talking about,April - September 1957. Elvis was 22 years old,a very young 22 year old,not very experienced at that time with life in general,also shy. That's why I think he was with girls who were not worldly. He also wasn't very well educated and I have heard Elvis say in an interview that he didn't like interlectuals and didn't hang around with these sort of people,for the same reason. They intimidated him.--Jaye9 (talk) 11:39, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

 * This is your personal interpretation of this quote, but you are wrong, Jaye9. Guralnick didn't say that Elvis was with girls who were not worldly. He only says that the more experienced (i.e. sexually experienced) girls would have liked to have sex with Elvis, but he wasn't really interested. With him, it was not like with other more sexually sophisticated stars or boys. This means that he didn't like to have sex with these girls. That Elvis was shy is confirmed by several other sources. Onefortyone (talk) 01:01, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Secound Section

User: 141 writes: "Other sources,among them eyewitness accounts by several girls,also say that Elvis primarily liked to be in bed and watch TV and eat and talk all night. This certainly means that the companionship was more important than having sex with these girls,although Gurlanick claims that "in the early morning hours they would make love" Query: how should the author or the Memphis Mafia know whether they actually made love in the bedroom? Both Elvis and the girls must of have been tired early in the morning after talking and reading the Bible or phitophical books all night long."

My Response

141 you write that "Other souces,among them eyewitness accounts by several girls,also say that Elvis primarily liked to be in bed and watch TV and eat and talk all night. This certainly means that the companionship was more important then having sex with these girls,"

Other souces and several girls, what there were two,three,four a hundred sources and girls all said the said the same thing as apposed to the other sources saying the complete opposite. Lets just cite them all and tally them up and see what we get. As I said before in his book Joe Esposito puts it in it's rightfull purspective when he says "In certain ways Elvis was not a very unsophisticated man. He love women,but he was not the super-sauve stud everyone thought he was. No one could live up to that image. Elvis slept with alot of women,especially in the early days,but he couldn't have slept with every girl he dated." source: Joe Esposito "Good Rockin Tonight" p.182

 * One of the most important statements is this one: June Juanico recalls a time when she stood up to Elvis in front of his band of hangers-on, who even then were beginning to accompany him everywhere. He grabbed her arm, took her into the bathroom and declared: 'Look, you are so right, I am really sorry.' He kept her there for five minutes, then swaggered out, his image intact." This means that young Elvis was well aware that he had to play a womanizer for publicity reasons, even before Memphis Mafia members such as Joe Esposito. And he did it very often when he dated girls. But many of these girls such as Julie Parrish, June Wilkinson, Natalie Wood, Cassandra Peterson, Dorothy "Dottie" Harmony, Lori Williams and others say they were only talking or reading or listening to his music in his bedroom. They didn't have sex. June Wilkinson, for instance, says that Elvis sat her on the bed in his bedroom and sang to her for two hours. "That was it." He even didn't make love to Anita Wood the whole four years he went with her. So he was not the womanizer as the media would like to tell us.

Actually Elvis acknowledges this as well,in his own way,which I'll cite from Joe Esposito's book. "Elvis," I begun tentatively,"I have a personal question for you,but you don't have to answer if you don't want to."

"Shoot"

"Well,you've been with so many girls. Have you ever gotten one pregnant?"

He smiled. "First of all,Joe." he said "if I'd slept with every woman the movie magazines say I have,I would have been dead a long time ago. Before I went into the Army,there were three differemt girls who claimed I made them pregnant. A couple of them claimed they'd had abortions. But I didn't get them pregnant.

"How do you know for sure?"

"Whenever I'm making love,I make sure I don't come in them I pull out in plenty of time." p.48

 * So Elvis was very sure that he didn't get the girls pregnant. The only way to be sure is not to have full sex with them.

Then you continue with "although Gurlanick claims that "in the early morning hours they would make love" Query: how would the author or the member of the Memphis Mafia know wherther they made love in the bedroom? Both Elvis and the girls must have been tired early in the morning after talking or reading the Bible or philosphical books all night long."

My Response

In regard to you saying how would the author or the Memphis Mafia know this to be the case. Let's put it this way,I read an interview with Peter Gurlanick on the internet,(sorry ,but I'm pressed for time,I will cite it for you in three weeks for sure)to my memory he mainly talked about Elvis's music, but he did talk about Albert Goldman,not to any large degree, but part of what he spoke about was what Goldman had written in his book "Elvis" Goldman had said that the Memphis Mafia would go to down down Los Angelos and buy the lattest f**K books for Elvis and Elvis would take one these books to bed and masturbate every night and  said that Elvis was a cronic masturbater and Peter Gurlanic had said how would he know,he wasn't in the bedroom with Elvis. So you see,looking at what he said and being the type of biograhpher Peter Gurlanick is known for, I seriously doubt he would have said that Elvis had made love with these girls in the early hours of the morning without a having a reliable source or sources.

 * Neither Goldman nor Guralnick could have been sure what really happened in Elvis's bedroom. Guralnick didn't cite a source for his claim that Elvis had sex with the girls in the morning. However, many girls who were with Elvis tell us that they didn't have sex. And if the Memphis Mafia members bought f**k books for Elvis, you may ask: what do most men do with these books? Onefortyone (talk) 01:01, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

141,then finishes off with "Both Elvis and the girls must have been tired early in the morning after talking or reading the Bible or philophical books all night long."

So here you are questioning Peter Gurlanick's integrity as a writter and the Memphis Mafia who knew him(men talk).

You don't look at that, instead you give you own interpretation of things, by saying "Elvis and the girls must have been tired early in the morning after talking and reading the Bible or philophical books books all night long." After reading that I say to myself,who do I believe Peter Gurlanick & the Memphis Mafia or 141 intriging little insight. Have a guess?--Jaye9 (talk) 13:22, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

 * I have only questioned Guralnick's unsourced claim because it is contradicted by several other accounts. According to Alanna Nash, Elvis "would never put himself inside one of these girls." Onefortyone (talk) 01:01, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Third Section

User:141 writes: "Only occassionly this might be the case, as Anne Helme stated that they had sex,relating that they "played cards into the early morning hours,when Presley would ask her to slip into a flauncy,yellow baby-doll nighty he had  bought her" Perhaps this was the souce Gurlanick  had in mind."

141 then says "Therefore,it is not necessary to cite the extra paragraphs from Gurlanicks book in the Wiklpedia article,as the author claims that "in the early morning hours they would make love" (a statement presumably based on a simple source such as Anne Helm)is contradicted by several sources."

My Response

Are you saying 141 that Anne Helme may have been Peter Gurlanick's source or based on what she said,to give cause for Peter Gurlanick to put that in?

As I've said before Anne Helme to my knowledge has not down many interviews. The only time I've read any interviews with her and what she has said about her relationship with Elvis,was in the book "Down At The End Of Lonely Street" by Peter Harry Brown & Pat H. Broeske. Peter Gurlanick was talking about the girls he was with back in 1957. Anne Helme wasn't in a relationship with Elvis until he made the movie "Follow That Dream" I think it was 1961. For that reason why would Peter Gurlanick use her as a source,she wasn't there in 1957.

So this is your explanation as to why the "making love" bit not be included into the Wikipedia article.--Jaye9 (talk) 14:06, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

 * You made a point. It seems as if Anne Helm wasn't Guralnick's source. This raises the question: did he base his claim on a reliable source or not?

Fourth Section

User:141 writes: "However most girls say it didn't happen,as in her memoir,Breath Out(2005) Peggy Lipton says that Presley was like a teenage boy." He didn't feel like a man next to me - more like a teenage boy which never matured. "When he tried to make love with Lipton,"He just wasn't up to sex,he was virtually importent."

My Response

I don't know much about Peggy Lipton as I havn't read her book,but the little bit I've heard is that she dated Elvis for about a month I think,didn't she take him to that Scientology place in Los Angelos in the early 70's? I don't disbelieve that this may have occured from time to time with her or anybody else during the 70's,as a result of Elvis's drug intake and what I've read it got progressively worse for him not only physically but mentally as time went on and that his sex life would have been just about nill during the last stages of his life,as stated by the Memphis Mafia (Billy Smith,Lamar Fike & Marty Lacker) from their updated book Elvis and the Memphis Mafia. I will let the sources I cite explain this. Let me say quickly 141,this was the 70's,not the 50's,so I don't know why you felt the need to mention this in your text in the first place,isn't this all over what Peter Gurlanick had to say what occured in 1957?

 * You are right that this didn't occur in 1957. However, Lipton's account shows that Elvis still hehaved like a teenage boy in the 70s. This means he was not a womanizer. Onefortyone (talk) 01:01, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Before I cite this it is pretty explicit for an Elvis Talk Page, for that reason I will just touch on it shall we say: Barbara Leigh who dated Elvis from 1970 to 1972 writes of their first date: "If anything was foreplay to Elvis it was kissing. He loved to kiss. Our heavy kissing led to our first night of lovemaking"

"Elvis was very passionate and sensual he had the Jailhouse Rock in him and kissed me over and over. (Skipped a bit) We kissed even more passionately,almost out of control. He was spontanious,hungry and made love with the enthusiasm of a teenager" and it goes on. Source: "The King,McQueen and The Love Machine.p.34

 * This quote is fully in line with Peggy Lipton's account and shows that Elvis in the 70s was still making love like a teenager. In most cases, he was enthusiastically kissing but not having full sex. This is also supported by other sources. Onefortyone (talk) 01:01, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Joyce Bova who dated Elvis from 1969 - 1972 (Memphis Mafis members Lamar Fike,Billy Smith & Marty Lacker dispute this lenght of time as only 1 year, in their book Elvis and the Memphis Mafia) Again this book is also fairly explicet so I'll only cite part of it, if only to explain about the effect of the pills was having on Elvis and even his partners.

"Elvis had sat up,pulled back the covers and began taking off his pajams. He was moving quickly,much more quickly than usual,maybe he feared the pills would take effect and prevent us from making love. Waiting to keep pace, I sat up and started to pull my nightgown over my head when suddenly I found I was struggling,my arms heavy as lead. The pills...." source: Joyce Bova "Don't Ask Forever"

 * Does this sound as if Elvis liked to have full sex? I don't think so. Onefortyone (talk) 01:01, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Last source around 1975. Joe Esposito talks about Elvis's girlfreind Shelia Ryan. "Three or four dates later,Shelia and Elvis finally made love. But he was no longer the healthy young man he's been with Barbara Leigh and Linda Thompson" skipped a few paragraphs

 * How should Joe Esposito know what was really going on in Elvis's bedroom? Onefortyone (talk) 01:01, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

"Shelia hated when Elvis took valium injections to help in rest. As soon as they took effect,he would grin sloppily and drawl,"Baby...come here" Shelia was exhausted from touring and taking care of him,and sex was the last thing on her mind. Source: Joe Esposito "Good Rockin' Tonight" p214--Jaye9 (talk) 15:50, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

 * This sounds as if Sheila hated sex with the drug-addicted Elvis. In an interview, Sheila Ryan said about their dates:
 * "Elvis and I used to hide. We would sneak out in the middle of the night and go get ice cream and it was like helicopters and the armed guard would come out and seek us out and hold us at gunpoint and take us back to the hotel. Of course, I'm exaggerating, but, yeah, we did. We just tried to be little kids, bad little kids. And he entertained me. The second night that I was there, he took me out on the balcony of the International Suite, that suite in Vegas was sort of his home. And he sang to me. And he would sing a lot and we would read and have fun. We did have fun. ... He was very much a little boy. He had that little boy quality.  I've often said, before I met him, he had that smile and everyone interpreted that smile to be his sexy look. And it wasn't that at all. It wasn't a sexy look. It was his innocence, his vulnerability. It wasn't at all something that he turned on and off. It was just, you know, just vulnerable. ... The man was just not normal. The biggest joy that he had was in giving and I didn't really understand it that much at the time. But it was what brought most joy to him was to give. ... The thing that meant the most to me in my relationship with Elvis was that it was different than relationships that he had had with other women in that I wasn't the nagging, jealous. And I'm not saying that all the women that he was with were nagging and jealous but I didn't try to change him. I mean, I didn't expect him to be monogamous. When he would go away, I knew that he was gonna be with another woman and when he would come back he would tell me about what happened. And we would laugh ... Our relationship was passionate and I'm surprised to hear that women that I know, because at the time there were basically two. There was myself and Linda Thompson and we were sort of running the race. At first, he was seeing her and then I came along.  It was sort of like a horserace. We were neck and neck and then I fell behind. But I'd heard that he didn't have a lot of intimacy with women. That mostly he did, a lot of talking and staying up and reading. But we did have a very active passionate romantic life. Sometimes more than I was ready for, prepared for. Sometimes I was tired and it was no, no, no. So, you know, I'm really surprised to hear that other women had a problem with the lack of intimacy and sex. ... he would have me read to him until he would fall asleep.  I would slowly close the book and lean over and put it on the bedside table and then I was so excited because then I got to go to sleep. Just as I put my head on the pillow, Elvis would wake up and say..."Keep reading." ... In the middle of the night, Elvis wanted his hair dyed. And he wanted me to do it. He didn't want Charlie to do it. And I don't think Charlie really ever lived that down. ... He and Joe Esposito would sometimes get together before all the people came over. They'd be in the den and Elvis would start telling jokes. Then Joe would start telling jokes. It was interesting because they would finish each others sentences. Joe would tell a joke and then Elvis would finish the joke. Then they would start laughing.  Elvis would get carried away and he'd start hitting me on the leg like how someone will hit themselves on the leg when they're hysterical laughing. My leg would welting up a little bit. And then he used to have a good time with Ricky, his stepbrother. Elvis had this sword thing that he would do with Ricky. I don't know if you've heard about that.... Okay, there was a trick.  I don't even, you know, he could do things that were really not normal.  I mean, you could always feel safe no matter what Elvis was doing. You would always feel like there were angels around or something. But he had these two, kind of knives or samurai knives. And Elvis would say, "Ricky, go get me my knives." Well, Ricky would just break into a sweat and he'd turn red, "No, please, not the knives! I'll do anything. Please don't make me do that." So Elvis took these two knives and he'd go into his kind of karate mode, and do the ninja sounds up and down Ricky's body, missing him by just a little but never touched him. Of course, Elvis thought it was funny but Ricky didn't like it at all. ... There was this one thing. He had that all the guys had all these jokes between them and every one of them meant something. And I probably shouldn't say what it meant. But it was funny... It would mean "fuck you." ...... The whole group, Elvis and Joe and Jerry and Ricky and just whoever was around, it was just always laughter. Just did it all the time and there were jokes. I remember one time we were going to the Memphian theatre. We were going there and on the way, you know, they would say, so we're going to the Memphian, no, the Memphuan, no the Memphieuian, the Memphalpheu. It would spin off into something ridiculous. And then I would always need to wear somebody's coat because I forgot to pack mine.  Jerry Schilling always ended up having to give up his coat. So, it was like, "Damn, Elvis, why can't you just buy your girl a coat,"  And just lighthearted stuff.  It's hard to think of some of the things."
 * This interview supports the view that Elvis was more interested in having fun with either the girls he dated or the guys from the Memphis Mafia who were always around him and that he was not very interested in having sex with women. Although Sheila Ryan claims, perhaps for publicity reasons, that she had an active passionate romantic life with Elvis, she also emphasizes that he was like a little boy, and, most importantly, states, I'd heard that he didn't have a lot of intimacy with women. That mostly he did, a lot of talking and staying up and reading. The latter seems to have been the usual thing when Elvis had girls in his bedroom. Onefortyone (talk) 01:01, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Army
The article reads "[..] before being posted to Friedberg, Germany with the 3rd Armored Division.". So, is it Friedberg where Elvis spent most of his time in the army? (i.e. where he was based). There are several other places mentioned in connection with his military service: Wiesbaden (at least there he supposedly met Priscilla for the first time) and Bad Nauheim (there is even a Bad Nauheim medley) to name just a few. So, were those just temporary residences (during manoeuvres or holidays)? Where was he after all?

 * A good point. Rikstar (talk) 19:48, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Speaking about Priscilla, there are quite a few details of her story I never really understood and there's no mention of them here either:

 * How exactly were they introduced to each other? What I'm asking is, how in the world could a 14-years old unknown girl became acquainted with a 25 years old superstar? I know Elvis's schedule wasn't really as strict as any other's private, because he had his own residence, staff, then there were entertaining nights with jamming, drinks, and girls... but again nothing of this seems to fit to a 14-years old girl's universe...

 * How was it possible for their relationship (or whatever it was) to progress, given the 11 years age gap? I mean even nowadays you don't just date a 14 years old girl if you're over 18, otherwise you can easily end up in a cold place (that aside, there will be lots of disapproving looks around you e.g. family, friends, colleagues... something like "Dude, wtf, she's 14!").

It was many years ago I read Priscilla's book and my English was pretty far from being perfect, but I remember this part being somehow foggy. Other bios such as Jerry Hopkins book are even more silent about it (if I'm not wrong he also briefly mentions another girl, 11 years old). Perhaps such details are beyond the scope of wikipedia, but at the same time it could provide further insight in their relationship and Elvis personality. 82.4.24.17 (talk) 13:47, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

 * According to some authors, Elvis was a pedophile. There can be no doubt that Presley had met Beaulieu in Germany while stationed there with the U.S. Army and that she was only 14 years old when the singer began dating her. At that time, he even had a younger girl living in his house, says Scotty Moore in his book, That’s Alright, Elvis: The Untold Story of Elvis’s First Guitarist and Manager, Scotty Moore, p.162. Therefore, authors such as Albert Goldman have gone so far as to call Presley a "pedophile". Indeed, Elvis relationships were primarily with relatively young women. Reputed Elvis biographer Alanna Nash also confirms that the singer had a predilection for young adolescent girls. The author says that Presley was overly attached to his mother and could not relate normally to mature women; presumably, Presley sought out very young girls because he felt threatened by women his own age. See Alanna Nash, "The Secret Sex Life of Elvis." Penthouse, August 1997, 22-29. There were even home movies made with underage girls. According to Earl Greenwood, one of Elvis's "favorite things was to watch the girls have sex with each other. The faces changed and each group got younger, until on the final evening there were four fourteen-year-olds... The movies were Elvis's latest pride and joy. He and his boys watched parts of them every day..." It has been claimed that Elvis's relationship with Priscilla had remained platonic until she was of age. However, in her book, Child Bride: The Untold Story of Priscilla Beaulieu Presley (1997), biographer Suzanne Finstad says that Elvis and Priscilla slept together on their second date. This strongly supports the view that Elvis had pedophiliac leanings. Finstad's book further reveals that Priscilla didn't want to come to live with Elvis, but that her marriage was part of a mastermind for fame hatched by Priscilla and her mother and that she never loved Elvis. (Could it be that Priscilla's mother knew about Elvis's predilection for underage girls?) Finstad's book, which is based on extensive interviews with family, close friends, classmates, and co-stars of Priscilla, also describes Elvis's kinky tastes and his constant demands on Priscilla's appearance, and she emphasizes that the singer hated sexual intercourse. Onefortyone (talk) 17:22, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

 * I was just waiting for this: Funny how I can't seem to recall any 'girl' in a reliable source jumping on the dollar bandwagon to exploit such claims... 141 should introduce a new section entitled "ELVIS: THE PEDOPHILE". 141 has the sources; he should go ahead and do it. Please let him include reliable quotes from underage girls who actually had sex with Presley. Just think: Presley could have been gay, bisexual, pedophilic... and had sex with his Mom!!! Way to go Elvis! Rikstar (talk) 18:35, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Ruth E,have a look at what User:141 has done with his recent information and how he delievers it in a certain way,or should I say to appear in a certain way. This is exactly what I was talking about before,just by using certain information,piecing it together,I can make Elvis be what ever I want him to be. This is called selective referencing.

I usually find 141's responding text to be both perplexing and annoying,however on this occasion I am pleased he has done this very thing,because what I plan to do is disect this information section by section with the authors involved and put it into its rightful perspective once and for all and hopefully move on and get back to what it's supposed to about,a conscience and informative encyclopedic view on Elvis Aron Presley.

Give me a week and I will have it ready by the weekend. Riskar tidy it up where you see fit,I would really appreciate your help with this.--Jaye9 (talk) 00:03, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

 * Jaye, thank you for what you said. Though 141 had a lot of references in what he said, I have another idea, however I don't have any links for it, and I don't think it's here in Wikipedia.  I will try to find some links to past Southern customs (if I can).

 * What I'm thinking about is the acceptability of Southern men to have or take very young brides, or be attracted to very young women. If one looks at the lives of some prominent Southerners, for instance, Jerry Lee Lewis (married his 13 year old female cousin when he was in his 20's), Loretta Lynne (married at 13 to her husband "Doo", and I believe he was also in his 20's), and there are other examples.  Certain things about Mr. Presley were that he was always a "Southern boy" to the end and that he never changed.  According to the BBC documentary (I think it's called Elvis and Burgers, and it's on You Tube), Mr. Presley never learned to use silverware.  He also ate squirrel when he was young.  It's what people did then (and still do to this day.  Very poor people in the South).  I am friendly with many Southerners, and it just seems to me that though in today's modern world, taking a young bride is frowned on and not acceptable (rightly so, in my opinion), back then, especially in the South of the USA, things were different.Ruth E (talk) 09:13, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

New section?
I propose adding someting to the Legacy section (or a new one?} detailing the exploitation of Presley, especially immediately following his death. Material can be drawn from Hopkins' updated biog and can/should include some of David S. Wall's observations (re: EPE, etc.). Such a section/additions would not be negated to a related article, as other stuff has been. Rikstar (talk) 18:51, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

 * I think stuff I was thinking of adding would be more appropriate in the Elvis phenomenon section, but some bits could be added to Legacy in this article. Not a lot of feedback to improve/change this article at the moment, which is as I predicted. Rikstar (talk) 11:50, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

A new section may indeed be created. Here are some paragraphs from a former version of the article which could easily be used perhaps in an abridged form:

It was only after his death that an industry built itself around Presley. Many people of every race, creed and nationality were taking up a career as professional Elvis impersonators — or Elvis Tribute Artists (ETAs) as they now prefer to be called. Conversely, a parallel industry, mostly kitsch, continues to grow around his memory, chronicling his dietary and chemical predilections along with the trappings of his wide celebrity. Many impersonators still sing his songs. "While some of the impersonators perform a whole range of Presley music, the raw 1950s Elvis and the kitschy 1970s Elvis are the favorites."

The fans
It has been claimed that there are over 500 US fan clubs and that they exist in every state except three: North Dakota, Idaho and Wyoming. According to the American Demographics magazine, 84% of the US people say that their lives have been touched by Elvis Presley in some way, 70% have watched a movie starring Presley, 44% have danced to one of his songs, 31% have bought an Elvis record, CD or video, 10% have visited Graceland, 9% have bought Elvis memorabilia, 9% have read a book about Presley, and 5% have seen the singer in concert. Not all of these people are Presley fans.

Music critic and Presley biographer Dave Marsh says about the singer's fans: "There are people in places that count in the world, and people in places that don't. He is the son of the people who don't count, and their shining star. That's what makes him unique and what people still respond to." A collection of essays entitled The Adoring Audience: Fan Culture and Popular Media critically examines what distinguishes fans from general audiences and explores the relationship between fans and their adored media products. Part of this volume is the article, "Fandom and Gender" which includes an examination of female fantasies of Presley. To many of his female fans, the songs Presley sang "were secondary to his personality and the way he performed them," evoking the well-known emotional responses. In her autobiographical article, "Sexing Elvis" (1984), Sue Wise even describes "how she came to terms with her lesbianism through a close identification with the feminine side of the King."

"Elvis's 'effect' on young girls threatened those men who assumed that young girls needed to be protected both from sex in general and from its expression in questionable characters like Elvis in particular." However, there were not only female fantasies directed at the star. According to Reina Lewis and Peter Horne, "prints of Elvis Presley appeared to speak directly to the gay community."

"Perhaps it is an error of enthusiasm to freight Elvis Presley with too heavy a historical load", as, according to a public opinion poll among high school students in 1957, Pat Boone was "the nearly two-to-one favorite over Elvis Presley among boys and preferred almost three-to-one by girls"; yet, Presley "clearly outshines the other performers in rocknroll's first pantheon." This poll should, however, be taken with a grain of salt as Presley had significantly more record sales than Pat Boone.

The ritualization of the "Elvis cult"
There can be no doubt that it was primarily "the recording industry, which made Elvis Presley a mythical media demigod." "An excessive enterprise, empire and entity, Elvis appears on memorabilia and merchandise, in roadside relics and Graceland's gift shops; at fast food chains, in front yard flea markets and backyard shrines; World-Wide Web sites in cyberspace and sporting events; at parties and parades or as part of promotions, protests and pranks." On August 16, thousands of die-hard Elvis fans travel to Graceland every year in order to celebrate the anniversary of Presley's death. The ritualization of the Elvis cult is also manifested most prominently through the many live performances by Elvis impersonators. According to Marjorie Garber, "The phenomenon of 'Elvis impersonators,' which began long before the singer's death, is one of the most startling effects of the Elvis cult."

What is more, David S. Wall has shown that many authors who are writing books and articles on Presley are part of a "worldwide Elvis industry" which has a tendency towards supporting primarily a favorable view of the star. The content of the majority of these publications can be characterized as based on gossip about gossip, only occasionally providing some new surprising details. There are not many critical, unfavorable publications on Elvis's life. An example is Albert Goldman's controversial biography, Elvis (1981), in which the author unfavorably discusses the star's weight problems, his performing costumes and his sex life. Such books are frequently disparaged and harshly attacked by Elvis fan groups. Professor Wall has pointed out that one of the strategies of the various fan clubs and appreciation societies to which the bulk of Elvis fans belong is " 'community policing' to achieve governance at a distance... These organisations have, through their membership magazines, activities and sales operations, created a powerful moral majority" endeavoring to suppress most critical voices. "With a combined membership of millions, the fans form a formidable constituency of consumer power."

According to David Lowenthal, "Everything from Disneyland to the Holocaust Museum, ... from Elvis memorabilia to the Elgin Marbles bears the marks of the cult of heritage." "When it's an exhibition of Elvis memorabilia," even Marilyn Houlberg, professor at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago, "puts on the campy art-world hat and becomes a priestess of the Elvis cult." A collector in Newark, New Jersey "paid nearly a billion dollars for a messy nap-kin said to have been used once by Elvis Presley." Paul A. Cantor goes as far as to call the American Presley cult "a postmodern simulacrum of the German Hitler cult." Some fan groups even refuse to accept the fact of the star's death in 1977 (see the "Elvis lives?" section of this article).

In his book Elvis after Elvis: The Posthumous Career of a Living Legend (1996), Gilbert Rodman traces in detail Presley's manifestations in contemporary popular and not-so-popular culture. He draws upon the many Elvis "sightings," from Elvis's appearances at the heart of the 1992 presidential campaign to the debate over his worthiness as a subject for a postage stamp, and from Elvis's central role in furious debates about racism and the appropriation of African-American music to the world of Elvis impersonators and the importance of Graceland as a place of pilgrimage for fans and followers. The author further points out that Presley has become inseparable from many of the defining myths of US culture, enmeshed with the American Dream and the very idea of the "United States," caught up in debates about race, gender, and sexuality, and in the wars over what constitutes a national culture.

This Presley cult has been much criticized. "As one reader complained: I was really surprised that you used that article about the boring Elvis cult! You would use one on McDonald's?"

Critical voices
Indeed, there are not only positive voices concerning the singer and his life. During the early years of his career, Country blues guitarist Mississippi Slim constantly criticized Elvis. According to Jennifer Harrison, "Elvis faced criticism more often than appreciation" from a small town in South Memphis. "Much criticism has been heaped on Elvis, the Colonel, and others who controlled his creative (or not so creative) output, especially during the Hollywood years."

According to Robert A. Segal, Elvis was "a consummate mamma's boy, who lived his last twenty years as a recluse in a womblike, infantile world in which all of his wishes were immediately satisfied yet who deemed himself entirely normal, in fact 'all-American.'" When a CBS special on Presley was aired on October 3, 1977, shortly after the singer's death, it "received such harsh criticism that it is hard to imagine what the public response to Elvis's degeneration would have been if he had been alive." This special "only seemed to confirm the rumors of drug abuse."

In a recent study on the analogy of trash and rock 'n' roll, professor of English and drummer Steven Hamelman demonstrates that rock 'n' roll productions are often trash, that critics often trash rock 'n' roll productions, and that rock 'n' roll musicians often trash their lives. The author uses the tortured lives and premature deaths of Presley, John Lennon and Kurt Cobain in his section on "waste" in order to underscore the literal and figurative "waste" that, in his opinion, is part of rock 'n' roll.

However, one of the most frequent points of criticism is the overweight and androgyny of the late Las Vegas Presley. Time Out says that, "As Elvis got fatter, his shows got glammier." It has been said that the star, when he "returned to Las Vegas, heavier, in pancake makeup, wearing a white jumpsuit with an elaborate jeweled belt and cape, crooning pop songs to a microphone ... had become Liberace. Even his fans were now middle-aged matrons and blue-haired grandmothers, who praised him as a good son who loved his mother; Mother's Day became a special holiday for Elvis's fans." According to several modern gender studies, the singer had, like Liberace, presented "variations of the drag queen figure" in his final stages in Las Vegas, when he excessively used eye shadow, gold lamé suits and jumpsuits. Although described as a male sex symbol, Elvis was "insistently and paradoxically read by the culture as a boy, a eunuch, or a 'woman' – anything but a man," and in his Las Vegas white "Eagle" jumpsuit, designed by costumer Bill Belew, he appeared like "a transvestite successor to Marlene Dietrich." Indeed, Elvis had been "feminized", as Joel Foreman put it.

Thus, "Elvis' death did occur at a time when it could only help his reputation. Just before his death, Elvis had been forgotten by society." Except for the fans who held his memory in honor, he was chiefly "referred to as 'overweight and over-the-hill.'" After the singer's death, things changed. In their book When Elvis Died: A Chronicle of National and International Reaction to the Passing of an American King (1980), Neal and Janice Gregory documented through newspaper and television archives the reaction of the media to the spontaneous and unprecedented outpouring of public grief at Elvis's death. One reporter after another described scenes not witnessed since the death of Valentino. When President Jimmy Carter issued a public statement acknowledging Elvis's contribution to American life, he effected a turning point in our culture and the way the media reports on figures in show business. It could be argued that Elvis's death was the event that precipitated the media's dubious current obsession with celebrity. According to Curtis W. Ellision, "The most vivid anecdotes in When Elvis Died focus on the origins of the perpetual death memorial that Presley's home, Graceland, has become." The author adds that "Some anecdotes in the Gregory account reinforce the impression that Presley's death touched nostalgia for teenage years."

The Elvis religion
In a later essay, Neal and Janice Gregory critically discuss the media attention on the subsequent Elvis religion as a means to discredit his fans. Indeed, after his death, Presley had been seen by fans as "Other Jesus" or "Saint Elvis". "I don't think he will ever die down," Dolly Parton says. "He's considered by many to be like a religious figure, like Jesus. ... I don't know how to explain it, but it's there, and it's real, and people love it."

In his book Elvis Religion: The Cult of the King (2006), Gregory L. Reece describes the presence of Presley in books, songs, art, movies and on the Internet. The author sets out to appraise the religious significance of the star for popular culture. For instance, Paul Simon's 1986 song "Graceland" presents Graceland as a holy place. Movies like "Finding Graceland" and "Mystery Train" have Presley as the central character, bearing spiritual messages. In Portland, Oregon, a woman opened the so-called Twenty-Four Hour Church of Elvis. There, visitors could slip a quarter into a machine, — The Mystery of the Spinning Elvis — to supposedly contact the spirit of Presley. Some Internet sites even invite people to post accounts of their spiritual encounters with the singer. Several artists use Presley as a recurring theme because he is such an icon of pop culture. The Naked Art Studio in Birmingham had a showing of Elvis art. A mosaic entitled "The Last Supper (Elvis)," shows Presley enjoying a turkey leg at a table littered with pill bottles — allusions to Presley's religion and drug abuse. However, "Elvis stands for violence, uncertainty and loss," says Reece. "Elvis is the apocalyptic messenger. One doesn't seek him out for spiritual advice, but shudders at his presence." The author concludes that Presley is the sort of god the public wants today. Elvis was overweight, he dressed out of date and he took too many prescription drugs, just like us.

Only a small part of this material is already included in the current version of the article. Many parts have been excluded last year by Northmeister who created some additional pages in order to get rid of the critical material from the main article. Onefortyone (talk) 15:24, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

I reviewed my own sources and decided it would be better to expand another existing article (e.g. Elvis phenomenon) with my information and I think the same applies to the above. Rikstar (talk) 20:30, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Recent edits
I've made some additions/clean up. Would like to have made more to enable it all to read better, but there would no doubt be the same old objections. Rikstar (talk) 16:20, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Awards and recognition AKA - trivia list
This needs to be intergrated into the article, a similar thing was done very successfully on the Janet Jackson article, which subsequently became a GA. At the moment this is nothing more than a trivia list with a posh title. Has anyone concidered renominating this article soon it doesnt seem too far off on a quick scan? --— Realist 2  ( Come Speak To Me ) 17:27, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

 * Fair point. I'll look at integration. I agree it should be nominated too. Rikstar (talk) 06:38, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Have merged Awards and recognition with rest of article - mainly Legacy. Rikstar (talk) 11:41, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Its, good, great move. I would have put most of it into the legacy section too I imagine. Two things need to occur before you nominate.

Firstly make sure its all sourced, I often find on my articles that asking someone you trust but isnt a fan (in your case of elvis) to come in and Fact tag what needs sourcing. That way the editer respects you so they wont go overboard and be nasty yet they dont love Elvis so at least their honest.

Secondly the article needs a trim, its slightly on the bulky side, you cound probably say all the same stuff in fewer words if you tried. If you compare it along side any other huge solo acts they dont come close. Madonna was at 106,000 bytes but I had it reassessed because it wasnt worthy of a GA, its still being improved now and its come down to 85k with all the rubbish removed. You might find that theres stuff you cant source so removing will actually help cut down the article. My concern is that how completely source the article and the bytes jumps up to 130,000.

 * Concerning the length of the article, you have claimed that any other huge solo acts don't come close to Elvis Presley. You are wrong. For longer Wikipedia pages on big figures in the history of popular music, see the featured article on Bob Dylan (139,627 bytes) and the good article on Paul McCartney (122,724 bytes). This means that the Elvis article doesn't need to be trimmed in order to achieve GA status. Onefortyone (talk) 14:24, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Anyway, your priority would be to get someone you trust to honestly but fairly fact tag the article where needed. If you need any other advise feel free to call. — Realist 2  ( Come Speak To Me ) 14:46, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

 * Thanks R2. Take your point about length; you should have seen the FA nomination of 2 years ago - 150kish?? This article is pretty much impeccably sourced, but we can lose some stuff - if only other editors allow (it's been difficult...). Will give it a go. Rikstar (talk) 15:24, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
 * In which case you have come a long way already. ;-) — Realist 2  ( Come Speak To Me ) 15:30, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Elvis' 11th Birthday
There seems to be some confusion about what Elvis wanted for his 11th birthday. In the book The Elvis Encyclopedia ISBN 0753502933 (UK) it clearly states he wanted either a bicycle or a .22 calibre rifle on page 19. In the documentary "This Is Elvis", made in association with Elvis Presley Enterprises, the narrative clearly states that Elvis wanted a bicycle for his birthday but he got a guitar instead because it was cheaper. I have re-added this information with a link to the book code and a link to another site that mentions it also.ElvisFan1981 (talk) 23:47, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

I have also changed the date they moved to Memphis. The original source claims November 1948, however it also claims Elvis got his first guitar on his 10th birthday, not reliable enough for me I'm afraid. I have changed it to September 1948, as printed in The Elvis Encyclopedia ISBN 0753502933 (UK).ElvisFan1981 (talk) 23:58, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

 * Hi ElvisFan1981! Sorry I had to revert your previous edit, I just wanted you to clarify your sources regarding the additions you made. Just wondered: Is This Is Elvis a good source to use? I don't think it's used anywhere in this article as a source, because it derived all it's content from earlier sources. Is David Stanley's book so reliable or is it just his recollection of things? I've not got it. It would be good if you registered as an editor, then others could post comments on your talk page, but such things can be discussed here of course.

 * BTW, if you take a look at the way sources are cited in the notes/footnotes, you'll see a specific format has been adopted for books, weblinks, etc. These were all made consistent after the previous hotch potch of formatting was criticized as being well below par for a Featured Article candidate. It would be great if your citations were in the same format e.g. adding a retrieval date for web sources, etc. Thanks for all you've done - there haven't been any keen contributors lately, what with the vandalism and all. Rikstar (talk) 06:32, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

It's ok, you were right to revert my edits, I should have given sources the first time round but I just assumed that any Elvis fan worth their salt would have known such a detail. It's easy to assume that because I grew up studying the life and career of Elivs, that all his fans did. Completely my fault.

The documentary This Is Elvis was made in 1981 and was made in collaberation wtih EPE, as is evident with the use of Graceland in many scenes that were shot. It also featured very rare footage of Elivs, some of which had never been seen since their original recordings. David Stanley's book is indeed a reliable source for a number of reasons. David was the step-brother of Elivs, and as such had access to him practically 24 hours a day for the last 17 years of Presleys life. He also had access to EPE's records,and many of the people who had known Elvis since 1954/55. The Elvis Encyclopedia is a day-by-day account of Elvis' life and career, and I would highly recommend it to anyone who is interested in furthering their knowledge of Elvis Presley.

I'm sorry about the formats of my links, I'm kind of new here and am still learning my way around these things. I will take a look at how the others are written and try to learn a little more. In the mean time, I would appreciate it if anyone who is a little more experienced than me corrects them this time.ElvisFan1981 (talk) 06:57, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

 * Thanks for your reply. I really do sympathise with the formatting difficulties - I'm still learning! I have added the Stanley book to the list of References. When you click on edit in Early years, you will see how the rather weird formatting: "name=Stanley-19>Stanley and Coffey, p.19" refers to the Stanley book as listed in References. This just needs copying and the page no. inserting (twice) for each subsequent citation from the same book. I cannot re-format your other citations (footnotes 21 and 22) because you need to provide the page nos. for each. Also with footnotes 19 and 20, I think one of them supports the phrase that follows both footnote numbers. If so, one of the citations needs to be put after "...and the guitar was cheaper." Let me have the info and I'll do what I can, but it would be really helpful (and useful to you) if you have a stab. Another quick tip (you probably know this): click on history (between new section and move) and click on any (last) for changes you want to study because they will include all the essential formatting stuff (brackets, etc.) you don't see in the main article. Rikstar (talk) 10:19, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

 * EF1981: I've clean up some of the bits above, but a page reference is still needed. I hope you don't mind the changes; it's just to keep everything reading consistently, like taking out the school enrollment as his school is mentioned soon after. Details can be good, but if they're not relevant or interesting (or they repeat things) they will have to go to keep the article from getting too long. Hope you can register soon, so we can use your talk page... Rikstar (talk) 12:56, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Recent removals by Rikstar
Though you spent a lot of time on the article in order to improve the text, Rikstar, I am not happy with some of your recent deletions, for instance:

 * Wall has argued that many Presley authors are part of a "worldwide Elvis industry" which tends to be biased. He contends that few publications are critical. One such book is Albert Goldman's controversial biography (1981), in which the author unfavorably discusses the star's weight problems, his stage costumes and his sex life. Such books are frequently disparaged and harshly attacked by Elvis fan groups. Professor Wall claims that one of the strategies of fan clubs and appreciation societies is "'community policing' to achieve governance at a distance... These organisations have, through their membership magazines, activities and sales operations, created a powerful moral majority" endeavoring to suppress most critical voices. "With a combined membership of millions, the fans form a formidable constituency of consumer power."

 * Vernon Presley recalled: "There were times we had nothing to eat but cornbread and water ... but we always had compassion for people. Poor we were, I’ll never deny that. But trash we weren’t ... We never had any prejudice. We never put anybody down. Neither did Elvis."

 * The article claims that "the so-called dangerous rock-and-roll idol was anything but a despotic ruler in the bedroom ... He was far more interested in heavy petting."

 * Peggy Lipton further relates that with Presley it "didn't feel like a man next to me—more like a boy who'd never matured." When he tried to make love to her, "he just wasn't up to sex. Not that he wasn't built, but with me, at least, he was virtually impotent."

 * In his critical study on the "dream machine" (media manipulation to create semi-fictional icons), Gamson cites a press agent "saying that his client, Ann-Margret, could initially have been "sold ... as anything"; "She was a new product. We felt there was a need in The Industry for a female Elvis Presley."

See also these edits:, , ,. I will leave it for now but I would like to reinclude the material. Onefortyone (talk) 14:27, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Elvis sightings
Why does the last edit say it was removed from Category:Possibly living people]? We have an entire article devoted to Elvis sightings!!! Elvisfan4life (talk) 17:23, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Because Wikipedia guidelines discourages fringe theories. Bytebear (talk) 17:52, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Also, note that the Elvis sightings article explicitly states that Elvis is dead. Bytebear (talk) 18:09, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

And we have a whole industry devoted to making up stuff about celebrities. "Reliable" and "authoritative" are two key concepts. Steve Pastor (talk) 22:17, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

title: Talk:Elvis Presley/Archive 23