text:
Talk:List of former sovereign states

Ideas for improvement from archived sections

 * Add the hundreds of states that sprung up during the Russian Civil War; see: http://worldstatesmen.org/Russia_war.html
 * Link to the entity a former state became or merged into (like Former countries in Europe after 1815)
 * Somehow indicate states that continued with the same territory, but merely changed government.
 * Merge lists of annexed and dismembered states into main tables with fates listed.
 * Add dates to states without them, for verification that they are in the correct section (and to help readers)

Earliest dates for inclusion
Several regions/modern countries (Britain, Iberia, France, Germany) have their various predecessor states listed back to the fall of the Roman Empire or thereabouts, but others (e.g. Russia, Italy) only list predecessors from the Early Modern, or even 19th Century. Is there a deliberate reason for this, or is it just no-one has got around to adding them? Also, is there a reason the Selucid Empire is missing from Persia? 62.172.108.23 (talk) 17:21, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Everything before the Early Modern period is on List of pre-modern states, including Seleucid Empire. -- Beland (talk) 20:31, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Modern states?
Reading this article one can notice that Frankish Empire was an state of modern france. I disagree.

There is a section for former medieval kingdoms. Modern states list it is too long. It shouldn't be made longer by adding more medieval states. They have their own category. I removed the most obvious medieval ones from the list and only left the ones which last until modern times. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Caquinoh (talk • contribs) 00:00, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Confederation of the Equator, Juliana Republic, etc...
I'd like to point out that the Juliana Republic never existed. Rebells took a small town in southern Santa Catarina province and "created" that republic. The government retook the town a few months later. The rebels never conquered the province's capital, or any other town.

The same applies to the Confederation of the Equator and to the Riograndense Republic. The rebels had a few towns in their control, but they never managed to rule over an entire province. --Lecen (talk) 22:33, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

 * All have since been removed. -- Beland (talk) 20:32, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

County of Foix
The County of Foix may only have become a crown land in the 17th century but it has been a fief of France throughout. If Foix is t be listed we could list all of France's fiefs. Gerard von Hebel (talk) 19:44, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Bold removals
I've WP:BOLDly removed several bulleted items which mentioned the Philippines from this article because, in my understanding, these items do not meet the stated criteria for inclusion. Please discuss at the the relevant point below, where I've copied the individual items I removed and described the article sections/subsections from which they were removed. If I have been too bold in some or all of these removals, reinsert them. However, please discuss reinsertions at the relevant point below.

I have only removed bulleted items mentioning the Philippines, but I suspect that a number of other items may not meet these inclusion criteria. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 23:15, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Inclusion criteria
For ease of reference, I'll reproduce the relevant inclusion criteria below:

 * The criteria for inclusion in this list is similar to that of the List of states with limited recognition. To be included here, a polity must have claimed statehood and either:
 * had de facto control over a territory, a population, a government, a capacity to enter into relations with other states, or
 * have been recognised as a state by at least one other state.

As I understand it, the inclusion criteria are met by either satisfying all three criteria in the first bulleted item or by satisfying the single criterion in the second bulleted item.

Removed from Asia -> In the Philippines

 * Tagalog Republic (1895-1898)
 * This seems to refer to the Katipunan insurgency under Andres Bonifacio described in the first part of the wikilinked article, members of which decided to style themselves as a national government in late August of 1896. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 23:15, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

 * First Philippine Republic (1898-1901) - fell to United States
 * This refers to an insurgency under Emilio Aguinaldo which had been largely inactive since December 1897 with its leadership in exile in Hong Kong and Singapore (see Pact of Biak-na-Bato), which became active again in 1898 during the Spanish-American War, which declared independence from Spain during that war, which styled itself as a constitutional government after sovereignty over the Philippines was passed from Spain to the United States in the Treaty of Paris (1898), and which fought an unsuccessful war of independence against the U.S. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 23:15, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Removed from Oceania
(Note: The Philippines is located in Asia, not in Oceania)

 * Philippine Islands – A territorial government under United States sovereignty in 1901-1935. Succeeded by the Commonwealth of the Philippines, also under United States sovereignty. Later independent as the Republic of the Philippines(1946).
 * This does not meet the inclusion criteria.

 * Commonwealth of the Philippines – a territory of the USA, which became independent in 1946 as the Republic of the Philippines.

 * Spanish East Indies – Spanish colony in the Philippines and in Micronesia until 1898. After the Spanish-American War, portions were ceded to the United States while the rest were sold to Germany.

Removed from Modern states and territories by type -> Former colonies, possessions, protectorates and territories -> North America

 * New Spain – The Spanish empire, from 1521 to 1821, the Americas with borders from California to the Carolinas, from Curaçao to Costa Rica, and from Colombia to Chile. The colony included Guam and the Philippines in Asia until 1898, Cuba and Puerto Rico in the Caribbean until 1898, parts of West Africa like Western Sahara, Liberia/Sierra Leone and Equatorial Guinea; and Oceania such as Micronesia and Solomon Islands. Spain briefly ruled over Portugal and its Portuguese colonies like Brazil, and throughout Africa and Asia from 1580 to 1640.

Removed from Modern states and territories by type -> Former colonies, possessions, protectorates and territories -> Oceania
(Note: The Philippines is located in Asia, not in Oceania)

 * Philippine Islands – A territorial government under United States sovereignty in 1901-1935. Succeeded by the Commonwealth of the Philippines, also under United States sovereignty. Later independent as the Republic of the Philippines(1946).

 * Commonwealth of the Philippines – a territory of the USA, which became independent in 1946 as the Republic of the Philippines.

 * Spanish East Indies – Spanish colony in the Philippines and in Micronesia until 1898. After the Spanish-American War, portions were ceded to the United States while the rest were sold to Germany.

Philippines: Sultanate of Rajah Buayan
I have moved Sultanate of Rajah Buayan here from the list of former sovereign states in the Philippines. Sultanate of Rajah Buayan currently redirects to Rajah Buayan, Maguindanao, which is a nonpolitical article about a 6th class municipality in the province of Maguindanao, Philippines.

From what I see here, this seems to refer to what is called there the Rajah Buayan Sultanate from 1899 to 1910 (the time of the 18th Sultan) and probably prior to that. The Philippines was under U.S. sovereignty from December 10, 1898 until July 4, 1946 and under Spanish sovereignty for some 300 years prior to that. There were insurgencies during the American period -- notably the Philippine-American War but, also and separately during and after that major conflict, in Mindanao and Tawi-Tawi. Those insurgencies still continue (or, if continue is not a good characterization, they re-erupt from time to time) up to the present. I'm guessing that there were probably related insurgencies during the Spanish period as well.

From what I can see, the Sultanate of Rajah Buayan is not now a sovereign state and probably has not been at least within the past 400+ years. Also, it looks to me as if the redirect at Sultanate of Rajah Buayan should be removed. See also Talk:Sultanate of Rajah Buayan I may replace that rdirect with a stub article, or I might not get around to doing that. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 03:42, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

What is this article supposed to list?
Even before you get to the actual list of states, this article seems confused as to what it is actually supposed to be about. Is it: Iapetus (talk) 16:16, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 * All extinct states (given that List of extinct states redirects here)?
 * Former sovereign states (as implied by the title)?
 * Historical sovereign states and non-sovereign states (as implied by the first line of the lede)?
 * Sovereign states, countries, nations, empires or territories (as stated by the second line of the lede)?
 * Recognized states (as per the criteria for inclusion)?
 * Post-medieval states (given that all older ones have been hived off to other articles)?

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of former sovereign states. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061025063501/http://www.fpif.org/pdf/vol5/09iftibet.pdf to http://www.fpif.org/pdf/vol5/09iftibet.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 15:25, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Catalonia keeps appearing
Catalonia keeps appearing as having been sovereign for a few days in October 2017. It was not. The regional government issued a declaration of independence, but even they admit it was a purely symbolic act (and they immediately "suspended" it in any case). There was never a Catalan state exercising sovereign authority. If even the government of the putative state does not recognize it, it was not a sovereign state in any sense. Hogweard (talk) 15:47, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:07, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Flag of the First and Second Saudi State.svg

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:53, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Flag of the Kingdom of Croatia (925).svg

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:26, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Flag of the Arab Federation.svg

IP edit
Dear IP,

please explain the reason of the mass removals. Thank you.(KIENGIR (talk) 18:34, 9 September 2020 (UTC))

Much of the "Sovereign States" listed were not in fact sovereign states and therefore do not meet the criteria of this article - I P — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.168.92.239 (talk) 23:34, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:55, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Flag of the Kazan Khanate.svg

The asserted sovereignty of some states listed here was generally unrecognized.
This line in the lead section came from this August 2020 edit, the edit summary of which suggested that the entries to which this applies should be flagged individually, with clarifying footnotes. Any objections? Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 13:25, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

IP edits
Dear IPs,

why are you keeping on adding dynasties which are not states?(KIENGIR (talk) 19:43, 7 October 2020 (UTC))

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:13, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Flag of Kirghiz ASSR (1920-25).svg

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:24, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Flag of Siberian Khanate.svg

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:53, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Flag of the Arab Federation.svg

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:54, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Flag of the Crimean ASSR (1938).svg

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:37, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Flag of the Kazan Khanate.svg

Flags
I stumbled across thsi when i noticed the so called flag of the avarian khagnate wich I thought was unrealistic after doing some digging and using some google translate I realised it was desingned by a russian flag designer when looking for where the flag was featured I found it here and have found many flags from countries that existed in the 13th century I think that this age offers a way to get rid of theese fake flags because a majority of them will be here so if we go througth all the flags and find there sources we can delte the fake flags.Joseph Pelorus (talk)

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:42, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Flag of Avars.svg (discussion)
 * Flag of Morocco 1073 1147.svg (discussion)
 * Flag of the Republic of Salé (1624-1668).svg (discussion)
 * Flag of the Republic of the Rif.svg (discussion)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:09, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Touggourt Coat of Arms (French Algeria).svg

Fiji governments
This edit caught my eye. It unreverted an addition, saying:. Based on a look at the initial sentence if the Sovereign state article, it seems to me that the revert ought to be undone. However, the initial sentence of this article puts some qualifiers on that. Also, from a look at the Fiji article, it seems that the situation re Fiji is more complicated than just the 1987 change. I'm no expert, but it looks like this needs discussion here. by regular editors of this article with more topical expertise than I.

Discussion? Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 10:25, 18 September 2021 (UTC) Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 10:25, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:25, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Flag of Siberian Khanate.svg

Fundamental change to this article is needed
Many of the so called previous sovereign states are still there but with a change of government or a change of constitution creating a new name. To use the latest addition as an example: Afghanistan as a sovereign state is the same now as it was a year ago, or twenty years ago. Just because a new more radical change of government has occured does not alter that. I think there needs to be a much clearer definition of what should be added to this list and a simultaneous removal of at least half of the listed states. Roger 8 Roger (talk) 20:31, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

 * Indeed, @R8R. I stumbled on this list via recent changes. The lead defines what is a sovereign state, but it doesn't say what it means to be considered "former". ⁓ Pelagic ( messages ) 03:38, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

I agree, many entries currently on the list are really just former governments of current states. The state itself existed before and after the date listed. It is also not a list every of possible former official name of a state. Example: "Republic of _____" becoming "Federal Republic of _____" is not a new state, just a new official name of the same state. SimonX (talk) 11:04, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:08, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Flag of Turkestan ASSR (1919-1921).svg

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:24, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Flag of Mountain ASSR (1921-1924).svg

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion: You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:07, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
 * The Battalion flag of the Molucca’s Sultanate of Ternate.gif

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:52, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Bendera Kesultanan SMB II.png

Split Request
I think this page should be split, can someone do this plz 2600:1700:6180:6290:68A2:D5A2:9C6A:3276 (talk) 23:23, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:24, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
 * War flag of Khanate of Bukhara.svg

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:00, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Flag of Afghanistan (1974–1978).svg (discussion)
 * Flag of Afghanistan (1987–1992).svg (discussion)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:53, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Flag of the Majapahit Empire.svg

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:09, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Flag of Kingdom of Kurdistan (1922-1924).svg

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:39, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Flag of the Chinese Communist Party (Pre-1996).svg

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:22, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Flag of the Kalmyk Khanate.svg

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:40, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Flag of Adal Sultanate.svg

Recommend removing flags
After seeing the unsourced flags I just removed and all the Commons notices above, I would strongly recommend that all these mini-flag icons simply be removed. They're unnecessary for the list and they just draw disproportionate attention to some links over others, which is incidentally the reason why flags are discouraged in infoboxes. I also note that a similar list article, List of pre-modern states, indeed does not include flags.

Historical flags are also a very different matter from modern flags and unsourced or WP:OR historical flags are pervasive on Wikipedia (or in Wiki Commons). The flags included here are presumably whatever happened to be included in another article at one point or another, so inevitably there are deprecated or unsourced versions. It seems impractical to keep track of all this here, so sticking to links and leaving the content to the linked articles might avoid problems. R Prazeres (talk) 18:24, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

Paris Commune
Wa State makes decisions autonomously but is not sovereign. Do you have evidence that the Paris Commune claimed statehood? – Gluonz  talk contribs 20:30, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

 * Did the Provisional Government of Milan Declare itself a Nation? Did the Novgorod Republic? or the Military Dictatorship of Mughan? I'm sure they didn't consider themselves a Nation. but they didn't deny it. Did the Paris Commune Deny it? Malios2 (talk) 13:30, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Probably not, but that is irrelevant to the criteria for this list, which include claiming statehood. Does modern Paris deny it? Or how about Castelmoron-d'Albret (French commune with the smallest area)? Should we add that to the list because it does not specifically reject its own statehood? – Gluonz  talk contribs 15:57, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
 * The Paris Commune didn't have a suzerain. It had the highest authority over the land it controlled. And as far as I'm aware didn't answer to France.
 * Sovereign state Malios2 (talk) 19:16, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
 * However I Reversed my decision this morning because of the recognition criteria. Malios2 (talk) 19:44, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

Pre-unified Yemen
I see that both North Yemen (Yemen Arab Republic) and South Yemen qualify to be in the list of modern states and territories by geography, but before I go ahead and add them I just wanted to make sure if I’m right or if I’m missing something. |MK| 📝 23:16, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

 * I’ve added both countries to the list. |MK|  📝 14:07, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Talk:List of former sovereign states


text:
Ellipse

In mathematics, an ellipse is a plane curve surrounding two focal points, such that for all points on the curve, the sum of the two distances to the focal points is a constant. It generalizes a circle, which is the special type of ellipse in which the two focal points are the same. The elongation of an ellipse is measured by its eccentricity $$e$$, a number ranging from $$e = 0$$ (the limiting case of a circle) to $$e = 1$$ (the limiting case of infinite elongation, no longer an ellipse but a parabola).

An ellipse has a simple algebraic solution for its area, but only approximations for its perimeter (also known as circumference), for which integration is required to obtain an exact solution.

Analytically, the equation of a standard ellipse centered at the origin with width $$2a$$ and height $$2b$$ is: $$\frac{x^2}{a^2}+\frac{y^2}{b^2} = 1 .$$

Assuming $$a \ge b$$, the foci are $$(\pm c, 0)$$ for $c = \sqrt{a^2-b^2}$. The standard parametric equation is: $$(x,y) = (a\cos(t),b\sin(t)) \quad \text{for} \quad 0\leq t\leq 2\pi.$$

Ellipses are the closed type of conic section: a plane curve tracing the intersection of a cone with a plane (see figure). Ellipses have many similarities with the other two forms of conic sections, parabolas and hyperbolas, both of which are open and unbounded. An angled cross section of a right circular cylinder is also an ellipse.

An ellipse may also be defined in terms of one focal point and a line outside the ellipse called the directrix: for all points on the ellipse, the ratio between the distance to the focus and the distance to the directrix is a constant. This constant ratio is the above-mentioned eccentricity: $$e = \frac{c}{a} = \sqrt{1 - \frac{b^2}{a^2}}.$$

Ellipses are common in physics, astronomy and engineering. For example, the orbit of each planet in the Solar System is approximately an ellipse with the Sun at one focus point (more precisely, the focus is the barycenter of the Sun–planet pair). The same is true for moons orbiting planets and all other systems of two astronomical bodies. The shapes of planets and stars are often well described by ellipsoids. A circle viewed from a side angle looks like an ellipse: that is, the ellipse is the image of a circle under parallel or perspective projection. The ellipse is also the simplest Lissajous figure formed when the horizontal and vertical motions are sinusoids with the same frequency: a similar effect leads to elliptical polarization of light in optics.

The name, ἔλλειψις (élleipsis, "omission"), was given by Apollonius of Perga in his Conics.

Definition as locus of points
An ellipse can be defined geometrically as a set or locus of points in the Euclidean plane:

The midpoint $$C$$ of the line segment joining the foci is called the center of the ellipse. The line through the foci is called the major axis, and the line perpendicular to it through the center is the minor axis. The major axis intersects the ellipse at two vertices $$V_1,V_2$$, which have distance $$a$$ to the center. The distance $$c$$ of the foci to the center is called the focal distance or linear eccentricity. The quotient $$e = \tfrac{c}{a}$$ is the eccentricity.

The case $$F_1 = F_2$$ yields a circle and is included as a special type of ellipse.

The equation $$\left|PF_2\right| + \left|PF_1\right| = 2a$$ can be viewed in a different way (see figure):

$$c_2$$ is called the circular directrix (related to focus $F_2$) of the ellipse. This property should not be confused with the definition of an ellipse using a directrix line below.

Using Dandelin spheres, one can prove that any section of a cone with a plane is an ellipse, assuming the plane does not contain the apex and has slope less than that of the lines on the cone.

In Cartesian coordinates
[[File:Ellipse-param.svg|thumb|Shape parameters:a: semi-major axis,

b: semi-minor axis,

c: linear eccentricity,

p: semi-latus rectum (usually $\ell$).]]

Standard equation
The standard form of an ellipse in Cartesian coordinates assumes that the origin is the center of the ellipse, the x-axis is the major axis, and: the foci are the points $F_1 = (c,\, 0),\ F_2=(-c,\, 0)$,

the vertices are $V_1 = (a,\, 0),\ V_2 = (-a,\, 0)$. For an arbitrary point $$(x,y)$$ the distance to the focus $$(c,0)$$ is $\sqrt{(x - c)^2 + y^2 }$ and to the other focus $\sqrt{(x + c)^2 + y^2}$. Hence the point $$(x,\, y)$$ is on the ellipse whenever: $$\sqrt{(x - c)^2 + y^2} + \sqrt{(x + c)^2 + y^2} = 2a\ .$$

Removing the radicals by suitable squarings and using $$b^2 = a^2-c^2$$ (see diagram) produces the standard equation of the ellipse: $$\frac{x^2}{a^2} + \frac{y^2}{b^2} = 1,$$ or, solved for y: $$y = \pm\frac{b}{a}\sqrt{a^2 - x^2} = \pm \sqrt{\left(a^2 - x^2\right)\left(1 - e^2\right)}.$$

The width and height parameters $$a,\; b$$ are called the semi-major and semi-minor axes. The top and bottom points $$V_3 = (0,\, b),\; V_4 = (0,\, -b)$$ are the co-vertices. The distances from a point $$(x,\, y)$$ on the ellipse to the left and right foci are $$a + ex$$ and $$a - ex$$.

It follows from the equation that the ellipse is symmetric with respect to the coordinate axes and hence with respect to the origin.

Principal axes
Throughout this article, the semi-major and semi-minor axes are denoted $$a$$ and $$b$$, respectively, i.e. $$a \ge b > 0 \ .$$

In principle, the canonical ellipse equation $$\tfrac{x^2}{a^2} + \tfrac{y^2}{b^2} = 1 $$ may have $$a < b$$ (and hence the ellipse would be taller than it is wide). This form can be converted to the standard form by transposing the variable names $$x$$ and $$ y$$ and the parameter names $$a$$ and $$ b.$$

Linear eccentricity
This is the distance from the center to a focus: $$c = \sqrt{a^2 - b^2}$$.

Eccentricity
The eccentricity can be expressed as: $$e = \frac{c}{a} = \sqrt{1 - \left(\frac{b}{a}\right)^2},$$

assuming $$a > b.$$ An ellipse with equal axes ($$a = b$$) has zero eccentricity, and is a circle.

Semi-latus rectum
The length of the chord through one focus, perpendicular to the major axis, is called the latus rectum. One half of it is the semi-latus rectum $$\ell$$. A calculation shows: $$\ell = \frac{b^2}a = a \left(1 - e^2\right).$$

The semi-latus rectum $$\ell$$ is equal to the radius of curvature at the vertices (see section curvature).

Tangent
An arbitrary line $$g$$ intersects an ellipse at 0, 1, or 2 points, respectively called an exterior line, tangent and secant. Through any point of an ellipse there is a unique tangent. The tangent at a point $$(x_1,\, y_1)$$ of the ellipse $$\tfrac{x^2}{a^2} + \tfrac{y^2}{b^2} = 1$$ has the coordinate equation: $$\frac{x_1}{a^2}x + \frac{y_1}{b^2}y = 1.$$

A vector parametric equation of the tangent is: $$\vec x = \begin{pmatrix} x_1 \\ y_1 \end{pmatrix} + s \left(\begin{array}{r} -y_1 a^2 \\ x_1 b^2 \end{array}\right), \quad s \in \R. $$

Proof: Let $$(x_1,\, y_1)$$ be a point on an ellipse and $\vec{x} = \begin{pmatrix} x_1 \\ y_1 \end{pmatrix} + s \begin{pmatrix} u \\ v \end{pmatrix}$ be the equation of any line $$g$$ containing $$(x_1,\, y_1)$$. Inserting the line's equation into the ellipse equation and respecting $\frac{x_1^2}{a^2} + \frac{y_1^2}{b^2} = 1$ yields: $$ \frac{\left(x_1 + su\right)^2}{a^2} + \frac{\left(y_1 + sv\right)^2}{b^2} = 1\ \quad\Longrightarrow\quad 2s\left(\frac{x_1u}{a^2} + \frac{y_1v}{b^2}\right) + s^2\left(\frac{u^2}{a^2} + \frac{v^2}{b^2}\right) = 0\ .$$ There are then cases:
 * 1) $$\frac{x_1}{a^2}u + \frac{y_1}{b^2}v = 0.$$ Then line $$g$$ and the ellipse have only point $$(x_1,\, y_1)$$ in common, and $$g$$ is a tangent. The tangent direction has perpendicular vector $$\begin{pmatrix} \frac{x_1}{a^2} & \frac{y_1}{b^2} \end{pmatrix}$$, so the tangent line has equation $\frac{x_1}{a^2}x + \tfrac{y_1}{b^2}y = k$  for some $$k$$. Because $$(x_1,\, y_1)$$ is on the tangent and the ellipse, one obtains $$k = 1$$.
 * 2) $$\frac{x_ 1}{a^2}u + \frac{y_1}{b^2}v \ne 0.$$ Then line $$g$$ has a second point in common with the ellipse, and is a secant.

Using (1) one finds that $$\begin{pmatrix} -y_1 a^2 & x_1 b^2 \end{pmatrix}$$ is a tangent vector at point $$(x_1,\, y_1)$$, which proves the vector equation.

If $$(x_1, y_1)$$ and $$(u, v)$$ are two points of the ellipse such that $\frac{x_1u}{a^2} + \tfrac{y_1v}{b^2} = 0$, then the points lie on two conjugate diameters (see below). (If $$a = b$$, the ellipse is a circle and "conjugate" means "orthogonal".)

Shifted ellipse
If the standard ellipse is shifted to have center $$\left(x_\circ,\, y_\circ\right)$$, its equation is $$\frac{\left(x - x_\circ\right)^2}{a^2} + \frac{\left(y - y_\circ\right)^2}{b^2} = 1 \ .$$

The axes are still parallel to the x- and y-axes.

General ellipse

In analytic geometry, the ellipse is defined as a quadric: the set of points $$(x,\, y)$$ of the Cartesian plane that, in non-degenerate cases, satisfy the implicit equation $$Ax^2 + Bxy + Cy^2 + Dx + Ey + F = 0$$ provided $$B^2 - 4AC < 0.$$

To distinguish the degenerate cases from the non-degenerate case, let ∆ be the determinant $$\Delta = \begin{vmatrix} A & \frac{1}{2}B & \frac{1}{2}D \\ \frac{1}{2}B &           C & \frac{1}{2}E \\ \frac{1}{2}D & \frac{1}{2}E &           F  \end{vmatrix} = ACF + \tfrac14 BDE - \tfrac14(AE^2 + CD^2 + FB^2). $$

Then the ellipse is a non-degenerate real ellipse if and only if C∆ < 0. If C∆ > 0, we have an imaginary ellipse, and if ∆ = 0, we have a point ellipse.

The general equation's coefficients can be obtained from known semi-major axis $$a$$, semi-minor axis $$b$$, center coordinates $$\left(x_\circ,\, y_\circ\right)$$, and rotation angle $$\theta$$ (the angle from the positive horizontal axis to the ellipse's major axis) using the formulae: $$\begin{align} A &=  a^2 \sin^2\theta + b^2 \cos^2\theta & B &= 2\left(b^2 - a^2\right) \sin\theta \cos\theta \\[1ex] C &=  a^2 \cos^2\theta + b^2 \sin^2\theta & D &= -2A x_\circ  -  B y_\circ \\[1ex] E &= - B x_\circ  - 2C y_\circ & F &=  A x_\circ^2 +  B x_\circ y_\circ + C y_\circ^2 - a^2 b^2. \end{align}$$

These expressions can be derived from the canonical equation $$\frac{X^2}{a^2} + \frac{Y^2}{b^2} = 1$$ by a Euclidean transformation of the coordinates $$(X,\, Y)$$: $$\begin{align} X &= \left(x - x_\circ\right) \cos\theta + \left(y - y_\circ\right) \sin\theta, \\ Y &= -\left(x - x_\circ\right) \sin\theta + \left(y - y_\circ\right) \cos\theta. \end{align}$$

Conversely, the canonical form parameters can be obtained from the general-form coefficients by the equations:

$$\begin{align} a, b   &= \frac{-\sqrt{2 \big(A E^2 + C D^2 - B D E + (B^2 - 4 A C) F\big)\big((A + C) \pm \sqrt{(A - C)^2 + B^2}\big)}}{B^2 - 4 A C}, \\ x_\circ &= \frac{2CD - BE}{B^2 - 4AC}, \\[5mu] y_\circ &= \frac{2AE - BD}{B^2 - 4AC}, \\[5mu] \theta &= \tfrac12 \operatorname{atan2}(-B,\, C-A), \end{align}$$

where $atan2$ is the 2-argument arctangent function.

Standard parametric representation
Using trigonometric functions, a parametric representation of the standard ellipse $$\tfrac{x^2}{a^2}+\tfrac{y^2}{b^2} = 1$$ is: $$(x,\, y) = (a \cos t,\, b \sin t),\ 0 \le t < 2\pi\, .$$

The parameter t (called the eccentric anomaly in astronomy) is not the angle of $$(x(t),y(t))$$ with the x-axis, but has a geometric meaning due to Philippe de La Hire (see  below).

Rational representation
With the substitution $u = \tan\left(\frac{t}{2}\right)$ and trigonometric formulae one obtains $$\cos t = \frac{1 - u^2}{1 + u^2}\ ,\quad \sin t = \frac{2u}{1 + u^2}$$

and the rational parametric equation of an ellipse $$\begin{cases} x(u) = a \, \dfrac{1 - u^2}{1 + u^2} \\[10mu] y(u) = b \, \dfrac{2u}{1 + u^2} \\[10mu] -\infty < u < \infty \end{cases}$$

which covers any point of the ellipse $$\tfrac{x^2}{a^2} + \tfrac{y^2}{b^2} = 1$$ except the left vertex $$(-a,\, 0)$$.

For $$u \in [0,\, 1],$$ this formula represents the right upper quarter of the ellipse moving counter-clockwise with increasing $$u.$$ The left vertex is the limit $\lim_{u \to \pm \infty} (x(u),\, y(u)) = (-a,\, 0)\;.$

Alternately, if the parameter $$[u:v]$$ is considered to be a point on the real projective line $\mathbf{P}(\mathbf{R})$, then the corresponding rational parametrization is $$ [u:v] \mapsto \left(a\frac{v^2 - u^2}{v^2 + u^2}, b\frac{2uv}{v^2 + u^2} \right). $$

Then $[1:0] \mapsto (-a,\, 0).$

Rational representations of conic sections are commonly used in computer-aided design (see Bezier curve).

Tangent slope as parameter
A parametric representation, which uses the slope $$m$$ of the tangent at a point of the ellipse can be obtained from the derivative of the standard representation $$\vec x(t) = (a \cos t,\, b \sin t)^\mathsf{T}$$: $$\vec x'(t) = (-a\sin t,\, b\cos t)^\mathsf{T} \quad \rightarrow \quad m = -\frac{b}{a}\cot t\quad \rightarrow \quad \cot t = -\frac{ma}{b}.$$

With help of trigonometric formulae one obtains: $$\cos t = \frac{\cot t}{\pm\sqrt{1 + \cot^2t}} = \frac{-ma}{\pm\sqrt{m^2 a^2 + b^2}}\ ,\quad\quad \sin t = \frac{1}{\pm\sqrt{1 + \cot^2t}} = \frac{b}{\pm\sqrt{m^2 a^2 + b^2}}.$$

Replacing $$\cos t$$ and $$\sin t$$ of the standard representation yields: $$\vec c_\pm(m) = \left(-\frac{ma^2}{\pm\sqrt{m^2 a^2 + b^2}},\;\frac{b^2}{\pm\sqrt{m^2a^2 + b^2}}\right),\, m \in \R.$$

Here $$m$$ is the slope of the tangent at the corresponding ellipse point, $$\vec c_+$$ is the upper and $$\vec c_-$$ the lower half of the ellipse. The vertices$$(\pm a,\, 0)$$, having vertical tangents, are not covered by the representation.

The equation of the tangent at point $$\vec c_\pm(m)$$ has the form $$y = mx + n$$. The still unknown $$n$$ can be determined by inserting the coordinates of the corresponding ellipse point $$\vec c_\pm(m)$$: $$y = mx \pm \sqrt{m^2 a^2 + b^2}\, .$$

This description of the tangents of an ellipse is an essential tool for the determination of the orthoptic of an ellipse. The orthoptic article contains another proof, without differential calculus and trigonometric formulae.

General ellipse
Another definition of an ellipse uses affine transformations:
 * Any ellipse is an affine image of the unit circle with equation $$x^2 + y^2 = 1$$.

An affine transformation of the Euclidean plane has the form $$\vec x \mapsto \vec f\!_0 + A\vec x$$, where $$A$$ is a regular matrix (with non-zero determinant) and $$\vec f\!_0$$ is an arbitrary vector. If $$\vec f\!_1, \vec f\!_2$$ are the column vectors of the matrix $$A$$, the unit circle $$(\cos(t), \sin(t))$$, $$0 \leq t \leq 2\pi$$, is mapped onto the ellipse: $$\vec x = \vec p(t) = \vec f\!_0 + \vec f\!_1 \cos t + \vec f\!_2 \sin t \, .$$
 * Parametric representation

Here $$\vec f\!_0$$ is the center and $$\vec f\!_1,\; \vec f\!_2$$ are the directions of two conjugate diameters, in general not perpendicular.

The four vertices of the ellipse are $$\vec p(t_0),\;\vec p\left(t_0 \pm \tfrac{\pi}{2}\right),\; \vec p\left(t_0 + \pi\right)$$, for a parameter $$t = t_0$$ defined by: $$\cot (2t_0) = \frac{\vec f\!_1^{\,2} - \vec f\!_2^{\,2}}{2\vec f\!_1 \cdot \vec f\!_2}.$$
 * Vertices

(If $$\vec f\!_1 \cdot \vec f\!_2 = 0$$, then $$t_0 = 0$$.) This is derived as follows. The tangent vector at point $$\vec p(t)$$ is: $$\vec p\,'(t) = -\vec f\!_1\sin t + \vec f\!_2\cos t \ .$$

At a vertex parameter $$t = t_0$$, the tangent is perpendicular to the major/minor axes, so: $$0 = \vec p'(t) \cdot \left(\vec p(t) -\vec f\!_0\right) = \left(-\vec f\!_1\sin t + \vec f\!_2\cos t\right) \cdot \left(\vec f\!_1 \cos t + \vec f\!_2 \sin t\right).$$

Expanding and applying the identities $$\; \cos^2 t -\sin^2 t=\cos 2t,\ \ 2\sin t \cos t = \sin 2t\;$$ gives the equation for $$t = t_0\; .$$

From Apollonios theorem (see below) one obtains: The area of an ellipse $$\;\vec x = \vec f_0 +\vec f_1 \cos t +\vec f_2 \sin t\; $$ is $$A=\pi \left|\det(\vec f_1, \vec f_2)\right| .$$
 * Area

With the abbreviations $$\; M=\vec f_1^2+\vec f_2^2, \ N = \left|\det(\vec f_1,\vec f_2)\right| $$ the statements of Apollonios's theorem can be written as: $$a^2+b^2=M, \quad ab=N \ .$$ Solving this nonlinear system for $$a,b$$ yields the semiaxes: $$\begin{align} a &= \frac{1}{2}(\sqrt{M+2N}+\sqrt{M-2N}) \\[1ex] b &= \frac{1}{2}(\sqrt{M+2N}-\sqrt{M-2N})\,. \end{align}$$
 * Semiaxes

Solving the parametric representation for $$\; \cos t,\sin t\;$$ by Cramer's rule and using $$\;\cos^2t+\sin^2t -1=0\; $$, one obtains the implicit representation $$\det{\left(\vec x\!-\!\vec f\!_0,\vec f\!_2\right)^2} + \det{\left(\vec f\!_1,\vec x\!-\!\vec f\!_0\right)^2} - \det{\left(\vec f\!_1,\vec f\!_2\right)^2} = 0.$$
 * Implicit representation

Conversely: If the equation
 * $$x^2+2cxy+d^2y^2-e^2=0\ ,$$ with $$\; d^2-c^2 >0 \; ,$$

of an ellipse centered at the origin is given, then the two vectors $$\vec f_1={e \choose 0},\quad \vec f_2=\frac{e}{\sqrt{d^2-c^2}}{-c\choose 1} $$ point to two conjugate points and the tools developed above are applicable.

Example: For the ellipse with equation $$\;x^2+2xy+3y^2-1=0\; $$ the vectors are $$\vec f_1={1 \choose 0},\quad \vec f_2=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}{-1\choose 1} .$$

For $$\vec f_0= {0\choose 0},\;\vec f_1= a {\cos \theta\choose \sin \theta},\;\vec f_2= b{-\sin \theta\choose \;\cos \theta}$$ one obtains a parametric representation of the standard ellipse rotated by angle $$\theta$$: $$\begin{align} x &= x_\theta(t) = a\cos\theta\cos t - b\sin\theta\sin t \,, \\ y &= y_\theta(t) = a\sin\theta\cos t + b\cos\theta\sin t \,. \end{align}$$
 * Rotated Standard ellipse

The definition of an ellipse in this section gives a parametric representation of an arbitrary ellipse, even in space, if one allows $$\vec f\!_0, \vec f\!_1, \vec f\!_2$$ to be vectors in space.
 * Ellipse in space

Polar form relative to center
In polar coordinates, with the origin at the center of the ellipse and with the angular coordinate $$\theta$$ measured from the major axis, the ellipse's equation is $$r(\theta) = \frac{ab}{\sqrt{(b \cos \theta)^2 + (a\sin \theta)^2}}=\frac{b}{\sqrt{1 - (e\cos\theta)^2}}$$ where $$e$$ is the eccentricity, not Euler's number.

Polar form relative to focus
If instead we use polar coordinates with the origin at one focus, with the angular coordinate $$\theta = 0$$ still measured from the major axis, the ellipse's equation is $$r(\theta)=\frac{a (1-e^2)}{1\pm e\cos\theta }$$

where the sign in the denominator is negative if the reference direction $$\theta = 0$$ points towards the center (as illustrated on the right), and positive if that direction points away from the center.

The angle $$\theta$$ is called the true anomaly of the point. The numerator $$\ell=a (1-e^2)$$ is the semi-latus rectum.

Eccentricity and the directrix property
Each of the two lines parallel to the minor axis, and at a distance of $d = \frac{a^2}{c} = \frac{a}{e}$ from it, is called a directrix of the ellipse (see diagram).
 * For an arbitrary point $$P$$ of the ellipse, the quotient of the distance to one focus and to the corresponding directrix (see diagram) is equal to the eccentricity: $$\frac{\left|PF_1\right|}{\left|Pl_1\right|} = \frac{\left|PF_2\right|}{\left|Pl_2\right|} = e = \frac{c}{a}\ .$$

The proof for the pair $$F_1, l_1$$ follows from the fact that $\left|PF_1\right|^2 = (x - c)^2 + y^2,\ \left|Pl_1\right|^2 = \left(x - \tfrac{a^2}{c}\right)^2$ and $$y^2 = b^2 - \tfrac{b^2}{a^2}x^2$$ satisfy the equation $$\left|PF_1\right|^2 - \frac{c^2}{a^2}\left|Pl_1\right|^2 = 0\, .$$

The second case is proven analogously.

The converse is also true and can be used to define an ellipse (in a manner similar to the definition of a parabola):
 * For any point $$F$$ (focus), any line $$l$$ (directrix) not through $$F$$, and any real number $$e$$ with $$0 < e < 1,$$ the ellipse is the locus of points for which the quotient of the distances to the point and to the line is $$e,$$ that is: $$E = \left\{P\ \left|\ \frac{|PF|}{|Pl|} = e\right.\right\}.$$

The extension to $$e = 0$$, which is the eccentricity of a circle, is not allowed in this context in the Euclidean plane. However, one may consider the directrix of a circle to be the line at infinity in the projective plane.

(The choice $$e = 1$$ yields a parabola, and if $$e > 1$$, a hyperbola.)

 * Proof

Let $$F = (f,\, 0),\ e > 0$$, and assume $$(0,\, 0)$$ is a point on the curve. The directrix $$l$$ has equation $$x = -\tfrac{f}{e}$$. With $$P = (x,\, y)$$, the relation $$|PF|^2 = e^2|Pl|^2$$ produces the equations
 * $$(x - f)^2 + y^2 = e^2\left(x + \frac{f}{e}\right)^2 = (ex + f)^2$$ and $$x^2\left(e^2 - 1\right) + 2xf(1 + e) - y^2 = 0.$$

The substitution $$p = f(1 + e)$$ yields $$x^2\left(e^2 - 1\right) + 2px - y^2 = 0.$$

This is the equation of an ellipse ($$e < 1$$), or a parabola ($$e = 1$$), or a hyperbola ($$e > 1$$). All of these non-degenerate conics have, in common, the origin as a vertex (see diagram).

If $$e < 1$$, introduce new parameters $$a,\, b$$ so that $$1 - e^2 = \tfrac{b^2}{a^2}, \text{ and }\ p = \tfrac{b^2}{a}$$, and then the equation above becomes $$\frac{(x - a)^2}{a^2} + \frac{y^2}{b^2} = 1\, ,$$

which is the equation of an ellipse with center $$(a,\, 0)$$, the x-axis as major axis, and the major/minor semi axis $$a,\, b$$.

 * Construction of a directrix

Because of $$c\cdot\tfrac{a^2}{c}=a^2$$ point $$L_1$$ of directrix $$l_1$$ (see diagram) and focus $$F_1$$ are inverse with respect to the circle inversion at circle $$x^2+y^2=a^2$$ (in diagram green). Hence $$L_1$$ can be constructed as shown in the diagram. Directrix $$l_1$$ is the perpendicular to the main axis at point $$L_1$$.

 * General ellipse

If the focus is $$F = \left(f_1,\, f_2\right)$$ and the directrix $$ux + vy + w = 0$$, one obtains the equation $$\left(x - f_1\right)^2 + \left(y - f_2\right)^2 = e^2 \frac{\left(ux + vy + w\right)^2}{u^2 + v^2}\ .$$

(The right side of the equation uses the Hesse normal form of a line to calculate the distance $$|Pl|$$.)

Focus-to-focus reflection property
An ellipse possesses the following property:
 * The normal at a point $$P$$ bisects the angle between the lines $$\overline{PF_1},\, \overline{PF_2}$$.

Because the tangent line is perpendicular to the normal, an equivalent statement is that the tangent is the external angle bisector of the lines to the foci (see diagram). Let $$L$$ be the point on the line $$\overline{PF_2}$$ with distance $$2a$$ to the focus $$F_2$$, where $$a$$ is the semi-major axis of the ellipse. Let line $$w$$ be the external angle bisector of the lines $$\overline{PF_1}$$ and $$\overline{PF_2}.$$ Take any other point $$Q$$ on $$w.$$ By the triangle inequality and the angle bisector theorem, $$2a = \left|LF_2\right| < {}$$$$\left|QF_2\right| + \left|QL\right| = {}$$$$\left|QF_2\right| + \left|QF_1\right|,$$ therefore $$Q$$ must be outside the ellipse. As this is true for every choice of $$Q,$$ $$w$$ only intersects the ellipse at the single point $$P$$ so must be the tangent line.
 * Proof

The rays from one focus are reflected by the ellipse to the second focus. This property has optical and acoustic applications similar to the reflective property of a parabola (see whispering gallery).
 * Application

Additionally, because of the focus-to-focus reflection property of ellipses, if the rays are allowed to continue propagating, reflected rays will eventually align closely with the major axis.

Definition of conjugate diameters

A circle has the following property:
 * The midpoints of parallel chords lie on a diameter.

An affine transformation preserves parallelism and midpoints of line segments, so this property is true for any ellipse. (Note that the parallel chords and the diameter are no longer orthogonal.)

Two diameters $$d_1,\, d_2$$ of an ellipse are conjugate if the midpoints of chords parallel to $$d_1$$ lie on $$d_2\ .$$
 * Definition:

From the diagram one finds:
 * Two diameters $$\overline{P_1 Q_1},\, \overline{P_2 Q_2}$$ of an ellipse are conjugate whenever the tangents at $$P_1$$ and $$Q_1$$ are parallel to $$\overline{P_2 Q_2}$$.

Conjugate diameters in an ellipse generalize orthogonal diameters in a circle.

In the parametric equation for a general ellipse given above, $$\vec x = \vec p(t) = \vec f\!_0 +\vec f\!_1 \cos t + \vec f\!_2 \sin t,$$

any pair of points $$\vec p(t),\ \vec p(t + \pi)$$ belong to a diameter, and the pair $$\vec p\left(t + \tfrac{\pi}{2}\right),\ \vec p\left(t - \tfrac{\pi}{2}\right)$$ belong to its conjugate diameter.

For the common parametric representation $$(a\cos t,b\sin t)$$ of the ellipse with equation $$\tfrac{x^2}{a^2}+\tfrac{y^2}{b^2}=1$$ one gets: The points
 * $$(x_1,y_1)=(\pm a\cos t,\pm b\sin t)\quad $$ (signs: (+,+) or (−,−) )
 * $$(x_2,y_2)=({\color{red}{\mp}} a\sin t,\pm b\cos t)\quad $$ (signs: (−,+) or (+,−) )
 * are conjugate and
 * $$\frac{x_1x_2}{a^2}+\frac{y_1y_2}{b^2}=0\ .$$

In case of a circle the last equation collapses to $$x_1x_2+y_1y_2=0\. $$

Theorem of Apollonios on conjugate diameters
For an ellipse with semi-axes $$a,\, b$$ the following is true:

 * Let $$c_1 $$ and $$ c_2$$ be halves of two conjugate diameters (see diagram) then
 * $$c_1^2 + c_2^2 = a^2 + b^2$$.
 * The triangle $$O,P_1,P_2$$ with sides $$c_1,\, c_2$$ (see diagram) has the constant area $A_\Delta = \frac{1}{2}ab$, which can be expressed by $$A_\Delta=\tfrac 1 2 c_2d_1=\tfrac 1 2 c_1c_2\sin\alpha$$, too. $$d_1$$ is the altitude of point $$P_1$$ and $$\alpha$$ the angle between the half diameters. Hence the area of the ellipse (see section metric properties) can be written as $$A_{el}=\pi ab=\pi c_2d_1=\pi c_1c_2\sin\alpha$$.
 * The parallelogram of tangents adjacent to the given conjugate diameters has the $$\text{Area}_{12} = 4ab\ .$$

Let the ellipse be in the canonical form with parametric equation $$\vec p(t) = (a\cos t,\, b\sin t).$$
 * Proof:

The two points $\vec c_1 = \vec p(t),\ \vec c_2 = \vec p\left(t + \frac{\pi}{2}\right)$ are on conjugate diameters (see previous section). From trigonometric formulae one obtains $$\vec c_2 = (-a\sin t,\, b\cos t)^\mathsf{T}$$ and $$\left|\vec c_1\right|^2 + \left|\vec c_2\right|^2 = \cdots = a^2 + b^2\, .$$

The area of the triangle generated by $$\vec c_1,\, \vec c_2$$ is $$A_\Delta = \tfrac{1}{2} \det\left(\vec c_1,\, \vec c_2\right) = \cdots = \tfrac{1}{2}ab$$

and from the diagram it can be seen that the area of the parallelogram is 8 times that of $$A_\Delta$$. Hence $$\text{Area}_{12} = 4ab\, .$$

Orthogonal tangents

For the ellipse $$\tfrac{x^2}{a^2} + \tfrac{y^2}{b^2} = 1$$ the intersection points of orthogonal tangents lie on the circle $$x^2 + y^2 = a^2 + b^2$$.

This circle is called orthoptic or director circle of the ellipse (not to be confused with the circular directrix defined above).

Drawing ellipses
Ellipses appear in descriptive geometry as images (parallel or central projection) of circles. There exist various tools to draw an ellipse. Computers provide the fastest and most accurate method for drawing an ellipse. However, technical tools (ellipsographs) to draw an ellipse without a computer exist. The principle was known to the 5th century mathematician Proclus, and the tool now known as an elliptical trammel was invented by Leonardo da Vinci.

If there is no ellipsograph available, one can draw an ellipse using an approximation by the four osculating circles at the vertices.

For any method described below, knowledge of the axes and the semi-axes is necessary (or equivalently: the foci and the semi-major axis). If this presumption is not fulfilled one has to know at least two conjugate diameters. With help of Rytz's construction the axes and semi-axes can be retrieved.

de La Hire's point construction
The following construction of single points of an ellipse is due to de La Hire. It is based on the standard parametric representation $$(a\cos t,\, b\sin t)$$ of an ellipse:
 * 1) Draw the two circles centered at the center of the ellipse with radii $$a,b$$ and the axes of the ellipse.
 * 2) Draw a line through the center, which intersects the two circles at point $$A$$ and $$B$$, respectively.
 * 3) Draw a line through $$A$$ that is parallel to the minor axis and a line through $$B$$ that is parallel to the major axis. These lines meet at an ellipse point (see diagram).
 * 4) Repeat steps (2) and (3) with different lines through the center.

Pins-and-string method
The characterization of an ellipse as the locus of points so that sum of the distances to the foci is constant leads to a method of drawing one using two drawing pins, a length of string, and a pencil. In this method, pins are pushed into the paper at two points, which become the ellipse's foci. A string is tied at each end to the two pins; its length after tying is $$2a$$. The tip of the pencil then traces an ellipse if it is moved while keeping the string taut. Using two pegs and a rope, gardeners use this procedure to outline an elliptical flower bed—thus it is called the gardener's ellipse. The Byzantine architect Anthemius of Tralles (c. 600) described how this method could be used to construct an elliptical reflector, and it was elaborated in a now-lost 9th-century treatise by Al-Ḥasan ibn Mūsā.

A similar method for drawing confocal ellipses with a closed string is due to the Irish bishop Charles Graves.

Paper strip methods
The two following methods rely on the parametric representation (see , above): $$(a\cos t,\, b\sin t)$$

This representation can be modeled technically by two simple methods. In both cases center, the axes and semi axes $$ a,\, b$$ have to be known.

The first method starts with
 * Method 1
 * a strip of paper of length $$a + b$$.

The point, where the semi axes meet is marked by $$P$$. If the strip slides with both ends on the axes of the desired ellipse, then point $$P$$ traces the ellipse. For the proof one shows that point $$P$$ has the parametric representation $$(a\cos t,\, b\sin t)$$, where parameter $$t$$ is the angle of the slope of the paper strip.

A technical realization of the motion of the paper strip can be achieved by a Tusi couple (see animation). The device is able to draw any ellipse with a fixed sum $$a + b$$, which is the radius of the large circle. This restriction may be a disadvantage in real life. More flexible is the second paper strip method.

Most ellipsograph drafting instruments are based on the second paperstrip method.

Approximation by osculating circles
From Metric properties below, one obtains:
 * The radius of curvature at the vertices $$V_1,\, V_2$$ is: $$\tfrac{b^2}{a}$$
 * The radius of curvature at the co-vertices $$V_3,\, V_4$$ is: $$\tfrac{a^2}{b}\ .$$

The diagram shows an easy way to find the centers of curvature $$C_1 = \left(a - \tfrac{b^2}{a}, 0\right),\, C_3 = \left(0, b - \tfrac{a^2}{b}\right)$$ at vertex $$V_1$$ and co-vertex $$V_3$$, respectively: (proof: simple calculation.)
 * 1) mark the auxiliary point $$H = (a,\, b)$$ and draw the line segment $$V_1 V_3\ ,$$
 * 2) draw the line through $$H$$, which is perpendicular to the line $$V_1 V_3\ ,$$
 * 3) the intersection points of this line with the axes are the centers of the osculating circles.

The centers for the remaining vertices are found by symmetry.

With help of a French curve one draws a curve, which has smooth contact to the osculating circles.

Steiner generation
The following method to construct single points of an ellipse relies on the Steiner generation of a conic section:
 * Given two pencils $$B(U),\, B(V)$$ of lines at two points $$U,\, V$$ (all lines containing $$U$$ and $$V$$, respectively) and a projective but not perspective mapping $$\pi$$ of $$B(U)$$ onto $$B(V)$$, then the intersection points of corresponding lines form a non-degenerate projective conic section.

For the generation of points of the ellipse $$\tfrac{x^2}{a^2} + \tfrac{y^2}{b^2} = 1$$ one uses the pencils at the vertices $$V_1,\, V_2$$. Let $$P = (0,\, b)$$ be an upper co-vertex of the ellipse and $$A = (-a,\, 2b),\, B = (a,\,2b)$$.

$$P$$ is the center of the rectangle $$V_1,\, V_2,\, B,\, A$$. The side $$\overline{AB}$$ of the rectangle is divided into n equal spaced line segments and this division is projected parallel with the diagonal $$AV_2$$ as direction onto the line segment  $$\overline{V_1B}$$ and assign the division as shown in the diagram. The parallel projection together with the reverse of the orientation is part of the projective mapping between the pencils at $$V_1$$ and $$V_2$$ needed. The intersection points of any two related lines  $$V_1 B_i$$ and $$V_2 A_i$$ are points of the uniquely defined ellipse. With help of the points $$C_1,\, \dotsc$$ the points of the second quarter of the ellipse can be determined. Analogously one obtains the points of the lower half of the ellipse.

Steiner generation can also be defined for hyperbolas and parabolas. It is sometimes called a parallelogram method because one can use other points rather than the vertices, which starts with a parallelogram instead of a rectangle.

As hypotrochoid
The ellipse is a special case of the hypotrochoid when $$R = 2r$$, as shown in the adjacent image. The special case of a moving circle with radius $$r$$ inside a circle with radius $$R = 2r$$ is called a Tusi couple.

Circles
A circle with equation $$\left(x - x_\circ\right)^2 + \left(y - y_\circ\right)^2 = r^2$$ is uniquely determined by three points $$\left(x_1, y_1\right),\; \left(x_2,\,y_2\right),\; \left(x_3,\, y_3\right)$$ not on a line. A simple way to determine the parameters $$x_\circ,y_\circ,r$$ uses the inscribed angle theorem for circles:
 * For four points $$P_i = \left(x_i,\, y_i\right),\ i = 1,\, 2,\, 3,\, 4,\,$$ (see diagram) the following statement is true:
 * The four points are on a circle if and only if the angles at $$P_3$$ and $$P_4$$ are equal.

Usually one measures inscribed angles by a degree or radian θ, but here the following measurement is more convenient:
 * In order to measure the angle between two lines with equations $$y = m_1x + d_1,\ y = m_2x + d_2,\ m_1 \ne m_2,$$ one uses the quotient: $$\frac{1 + m_1 m_2}{m_2 - m_1} = \cot\theta\ .$$

Inscribed angle theorem for circles
For four points $$P_i = \left(x_i,\, y_i\right),\ i = 1,\, 2,\, 3,\, 4,\,$$ no three of them on a line, we have the following (see diagram):

 * The four points are on a circle, if and only if the angles at $$P_3$$ and $$P_4$$ are equal. In terms of the angle measurement above, this means: $$

\frac{(x_4 - x_1)(x_4 - x_2) + (y_4 - y_1)(y_4 - y_2)} {(y_4 - y_1)(x_4 - x_2) - (y_4 - y_2)(x_4 - x_1)} = \frac{(x_3 - x_1)(x_3 - x_2) + (y_3 - y_1)(y_3 - y_2)} {(y_3 - y_1)(x_3 - x_2) - (y_3 - y_2)(x_3 - x_1)}. $$

At first the measure is available only for chords not parallel to the y-axis, but the final formula works for any chord.

Three-point form of circle equation

 * As a consequence, one obtains an equation for the circle determined by three non-collinear points $$P_i = \left(x_i,\, y_i\right)$$: $$

\frac{({\color{red}x} - x_1)({\color{red}x} - x_2) + ({\color{red}y} - y_1)({\color{red}y} - y_2)} {({\color{red}y} - y_1)({\color{red}x} - x_2) - ({\color{red}y} - y_2)({\color{red}x} - x_1)} = \frac{(x_3 - x_1)(x_3 - x_2) + (y_3 - y_1)(y_3 - y_2)} {(y_3 - y_1)(x_3 - x_2) - (y_3 - y_2)(x_3 - x_1)}. $$

For example, for $$P_1 = (2,\, 0),\; P_2 = (0,\, 1),\; P_3 = (0,\,0)$$ the three-point equation is:
 * $$\frac{(x - 2)x + y(y - 1)}{yx - (y - 1)(x - 2)} = 0$$, which can be rearranged to $$(x - 1)^2 + \left(y - \tfrac{1}{2}\right)^2 = \tfrac{5}{4}\ .$$

Using vectors, dot products and determinants this formula can be arranged more clearly, letting $$\vec x = (x,\, y)$$: $$ \frac{\left({\color{red}\vec x} - \vec x_1\right) \cdot \left({\color{red}\vec x} - \vec x_2\right)} {\det\left({\color{red}\vec x} - \vec x_1,{\color{red}\vec x} - \vec x_2\right)} = \frac{\left(\vec x_3 - \vec x_1\right) \cdot \left(\vec x_3 - \vec x_2\right)} {\det\left(\vec x_3 - \vec x_1, \vec x_3 - \vec x_2\right)}. $$

The center of the circle $$\left(x_\circ,\, y_\circ\right)$$ satisfies: $$\begin{bmatrix} 1 & \dfrac{y_1 - y_2}{x_1 - x_2} \\[2ex] \dfrac{x_1 - x_3}{y_1 - y_3} & 1 \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} x_\circ \\[1ex] y_\circ \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} \dfrac{x_1^2 - x_2^2 + y_1^2 - y_2^2}{2(x_1 - x_2)} \\[2ex] \dfrac{y_1^2 - y_3^2 + x_1^2 - x_3^2}{2(y_1 - y_3)} \end{bmatrix}. $$

The radius is the distance between any of the three points and the center. $$ r = \sqrt{\left(x_1 - x_\circ\right)^2 + \left(y_1 - y_\circ\right)^2} = \sqrt{\left(x_2 - x_\circ\right)^2 + \left(y_2 - y_\circ\right)^2} = \sqrt{\left(x_3 - x_\circ\right)^2 + \left(y_3 - y_\circ\right)^2}. $$

Ellipses
This section considers the family of ellipses defined by equations $$\tfrac{\left(x - x_\circ\right)^2}{a^2} + \tfrac{\left(y - y_\circ\right)^2}{b^2} = 1$$ with a fixed eccentricity $$e$$. It is convenient to use the parameter: $${\color{blue}q} = \frac{a^2}{b^2} = \frac{1}{1 - e^2},$$

and to write the ellipse equation as: $$\left(x - x_\circ\right)^2 + {\color{blue}q}\, \left(y - y_\circ\right)^2 = a^2,$$

where q is fixed and $$x_\circ,\, y_\circ,\, a$$ vary over the real numbers. (Such ellipses have their axes parallel to the coordinate axes: if $$q < 1$$, the major axis is parallel to the x-axis; if $$q > 1$$, it is parallel to the y-axis.)

Like a circle, such an ellipse is determined by three points not on a line.

For this family of ellipses, one introduces the following q-analog angle measure, which is not a function of the usual angle measure θ:
 * In order to measure an angle between two lines with equations $$y = m_1x + d_1,\ y = m_2x + d_2,\ m_1 \ne m_2$$ one uses the quotient: $$\frac{1 + {\color{blue}q}\; m_1 m_2}{m_2 - m_1}\ .$$

Inscribed angle theorem for ellipses

 * Given four points $$P_i = \left(x_i,\, y_i\right),\ i = 1,\, 2,\, 3,\, 4$$, no three of them on a line (see diagram).
 * The four points are on an ellipse with equation $$(x - x_\circ)^2 + {\color{blue}q}\, (y - y_\circ)^2 = a^2$$ if and only if the angles at $$P_3$$ and $$P_4$$ are equal in the sense of the measurement above—that is, if $$

\frac{(x_4 - x_1)(x_4 - x_2) + {\color{blue}q}\;(y_4 - y_1)(y_4 - y_2)} {(y_4 - y_1)(x_4 - x_2) - (y_4 - y_2)(x_4 - x_1)} = \frac{(x_3 - x_1)(x_3 - x_2) + {\color{blue}q}\;(y_3 - y_1)(y_3 - y_2)} {(y_3 - y_1)(x_3 - x_2) - (y_3 - y_2)(x_3 - x_1)}\. $$

At first the measure is available only for chords which are not parallel to the y-axis. But the final formula works for any chord. The proof follows from a straightforward calculation. For the direction of proof given that the points are on an ellipse, one can assume that the center of the ellipse is the origin.

Three-point form of ellipse equation

 * A consequence, one obtains an equation for the ellipse determined by three non-collinear points $$P_i = \left(x_i,\, y_i\right)$$: $$

\frac{({\color{red}x} - x_1)({\color{red}x} - x_2) + {\color{blue}q}\;({\color{red}y} - y_1)({\color{red}y} - y_2)} {({\color{red}y} - y_1)({\color{red}x} - x_2) - ({\color{red}y} - y_2)({\color{red}x} - x_1)} = \frac{(x_3 - x_1)(x_3 - x_2) + {\color{blue}q}\;(y_3 - y_1)(y_3 - y_2)} {(y_3 - y_1)(x_3 - x_2) - (y_3 - y_2)(x_3 - x_1)}\. $$

For example, for $$P_1 = (2,\, 0),\; P_2 = (0,\,1),\; P_3 = (0,\, 0)$$ and $$q = 4$$ one obtains the three-point form
 * $$\frac{(x - 2)x + 4y(y - 1)}{yx - (y - 1)(x - 2)} = 0$$ and after conversion $$\frac{(x - 1)^2}{2} + \frac{\left(y - \frac{1}{2}\right)^2}{\frac{1}{2}} = 1.$$

Analogously to the circle case, the equation can be written more clearly using vectors: $$   \frac{\left({\color{red}\vec x} - \vec x_1\right)*\left({\color{red}\vec x} - \vec x_2\right)} {\det\left({\color{red}\vec x} - \vec x_1,{\color{red}\vec x} - \vec x_2\right)} = \frac{\left(\vec x_3 - \vec x_1\right)*\left(\vec x_3 - \vec x_2\right)} {\det\left(\vec x_3 - \vec x_1, \vec x_3 - \vec x_2\right)}, $$

where $$*$$ is the modified dot product $$\vec u*\vec v = u_x v_x + {\color{blue}q}\,u_y v_y.$$

Pole-polar relation
Any ellipse can be described in a suitable coordinate system by an equation $$\tfrac{x^2}{a^2} + \tfrac{y^2}{b^2} = 1$$. The equation of the tangent at a point $$P_1 = \left(x_1,\, y_1\right)$$ of the ellipse is $$\tfrac{x_1x}{a^2} + \tfrac{y_1y}{b^2} = 1.$$ If one allows point $$P_1 = \left(x_1,\, y_1\right)$$ to be an arbitrary point different from the origin, then
 * point $$P_1 = \left(x_1,\, y_1\right) \neq (0,\, 0)$$ is mapped onto the line $$\tfrac{x_1 x}{a^2} + \tfrac{y_1 y}{b^2} = 1$$, not through the center of the ellipse.

This relation between points and lines is a bijection.

The inverse function maps
 * line $$y = mx + d,\ d \ne 0$$ onto the point $$\left(-\tfrac{ma^2}{d},\, \tfrac{b^2}{d}\right)$$ and
 * line $$x = c,\ c \ne 0$$ onto the point $$\left(\tfrac{a^2}{c},\, 0\right).$$

Such a relation between points and lines generated by a conic is called pole-polar relation or polarity. The pole is the point; the polar the line.

By calculation one can confirm the following properties of the pole-polar relation of the ellipse:
 * For a point (pole) on the ellipse, the polar is the tangent at this point (see diagram: $P_1,\, p_1$).
 * For a pole $$P$$ outside the ellipse, the intersection points of its polar with the ellipse are the tangency points of the two tangents passing $$P$$ (see diagram: $P_2,\, p_2$).
 * For a point within the ellipse, the polar has no point with the ellipse in common (see diagram: $F_1,\, l_1$).

 * 1) The intersection point of two polars is the pole of the line through their poles.
 * 2) The foci $$(c,\, 0)$$ and $$(-c,\, 0)$$, respectively, and the directrices $$x = \tfrac{a^2}{c}$$ and $$x = -\tfrac{a^2}{c}$$, respectively, belong to pairs of pole and polar. Because they are even polar pairs with respect to the circle $$x^2+y^2=a^2$$, the directrices can be constructed by compass and straightedge (see Inversive geometry).

Pole-polar relations exist for hyperbolas and parabolas as well.

Metric properties
All metric properties given below refer to an ellipse with equation

except for the section on the area enclosed by a tilted ellipse, where the generalized form of Eq.($$) will be given.

Area
The area $$A_\text{ellipse}$$ enclosed by an ellipse is:

where $$a$$ and $$b$$ are the lengths of the semi-major and semi-minor axes, respectively. The area formula $$\pi a b$$ is intuitive: start with a circle of radius $$b$$ (so its area is $$\pi b^2$$) and stretch it by a factor $$a/b$$ to make an ellipse. This scales the area by the same factor: $$\pi b^2(a/b) = \pi a b.$$ However, using the same approach for the circumference would be fallacious – compare the integrals $\int f(x)\, dx$ and $ \int \sqrt{1+f'^2(x)}\, dx$. It is also easy to rigorously prove the area formula using integration as follows. Equation ($$) can be rewritten as $y(x) = b \sqrt{1 - x^2 / a^2}.$  For $$x\in[-a,a],$$ this curve is the top half of the ellipse. So twice the integral of $$y(x)$$ over the interval $$[-a,a]$$ will be the area of the ellipse: $$\begin{align} A_\text{ellipse} &= \int_{-a}^a 2b\sqrt{1 - \frac{x^2}{a^2}}\,dx\\ &= \frac ba \int_{-a}^a 2\sqrt{a^2 - x^2}\,dx. \end{align}$$

The second integral is the area of a circle of radius $$a,$$ that is, $$\pi a^2.$$ So $$A_\text{ellipse} = \frac{b}{a}\pi a^2 = \pi ab.$$

An ellipse defined implicitly by $$Ax^2+ Bxy + Cy^2 = 1 $$ has area $$2\pi / \sqrt{4AC - B^2}.$$

The area can also be expressed in terms of eccentricity and the length of the semi-major axis as $$a^2\pi\sqrt{1-e^2}$$ (obtained by solving for flattening, then computing the semi-minor axis).

So far we have dealt with erect ellipses, whose major and minor axes are parallel to the $$x$$ and $$y$$ axes. However, some applications require tilted ellipses. In charged-particle beam optics, for instance, the enclosed area of an erect or tilted ellipse is an important property of the beam, its emittance. In this case a simple formula still applies, namely

where $$y_{\text{int}}$$, $$x_{\text{int}}$$ are intercepts and $$x_{\text{max}}$$, $$y_{\text{max}}$$ are maximum values. It follows directly from Apollonios's theorem.

Circumference

The circumference $$C$$ of an ellipse is: $$C \,=\, 4a\int_0^{\pi/2}\sqrt {1 - e^2 \sin^2\theta}\ d\theta \,=\, 4 a \,E(e)$$

where again $$a$$ is the length of the semi-major axis, $e=\sqrt{1 - b^2/a^2}$ is the eccentricity, and the function $$E$$ is the complete elliptic integral of the second kind, $$E(e) \,=\, \int_0^{\pi/2}\sqrt {1 - e^2 \sin^2\theta}\ d\theta$$ which is in general not an elementary function.

The circumference of the ellipse may be evaluated in terms of $$E(e)$$ using Gauss's arithmetic-geometric mean; this is a quadratically converging iterative method (see here for details).

The exact infinite series is: $$\begin{align} C &= 2\pi a \left[{1 - \left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^2e^2 - \left(\frac{1\cdot 3}{2\cdot 4}\right)^2\frac{e^4}{3} - \left(\frac{1\cdot 3\cdot 5}{2\cdot 4\cdot 6}\right)^2\frac{e^6}{5} - \cdots}\right] \\ &= 2\pi a \left[1 - \sum_{n=1}^\infty \left(\frac{(2n-1)!!}{(2n)!!}\right)^2 \frac{e^{2n}}{2n-1}\right] \\ &= -2\pi a \sum_{n=0}^\infty \left(\frac{(2n-1)!!}{(2n)!!}\right)^2 \frac{e^{2n}}{2n-1}, \end{align} $$ where $$n!!$$ is the double factorial (extended to negative odd integers by the recurrence relation $$(2n-1)!! = (2n+1)!!/(2n+1)$$, for $$n \le 0$$). This series converges, but by expanding in terms of $$h = (a-b)^2 / (a+b)^2,$$ James Ivory and Bessel derived an expression that converges much more rapidly: $$\begin{align} C &= \pi (a+b) \sum_{n=0}^\infty \left(\frac{(2n-3)!!}{2^n n!}\right)^2 h^n \\ &= \pi (a+b) \left[1 + \frac{h}{4} + \sum_{n=2}^\infty \left(\frac{(2n-3)!!}{2^n n!}\right)^2 h^n\right] \\ &= \pi (a+b) \left[1 + \sum_{n=1}^\infty \left(\frac{(2n-1)!!}{2^n n!}\right)^2 \frac{h^n}{(2n-1)^2}\right]. \end{align}$$

Srinivasa Ramanujan gave two close approximations for the circumference in §16 of "Modular Equations and Approximations to $$\pi$$"; they are $$C \approx \pi \biggl[3(a + b) - \sqrt{(3a + b)(a + 3b)} \biggr] = \pi \biggl[3(a + b) - \sqrt{10ab + 3\left(a^2 + b^2\right)}\biggr]$$ and $$C\approx\pi\left(a+b\right)\left(1+\frac{3h}{10+\sqrt{4-3h}}\right),$$ where $$h$$ takes on the same meaning as above. The errors in these approximations, which were obtained empirically, are of order $$h^3$$ and $$h^5,$$ respectively.

Arc length
More generally, the arc length of a portion of the circumference, as a function of the angle subtended (or $$ coordinates of any two points on the upper half of the ellipse), is given by an incomplete elliptic integral. The upper half of an ellipse is parameterized by $$ y = b\ \sqrt{ 1-\frac{x^{2}}{a^{2}}\ } ~.$$

Then the arc length $$s$$ from $$\ x_{1}\ $$ to $$\ x_{2}\ $$ is: $$s = -b\int_{\arccos \frac{x_1}{a}}^{\arccos \frac{x_2}{a}} \sqrt{\ 1 + \left( \tfrac{a^2}{b^2} - 1 \right)\ \sin^2 z ~} \; dz ~.$$

This is equivalent to $$ s = b\ \left[ \; E\left(z \;\Biggl|\; 1 - \frac{a^2}{b^2} \right) \; \right]^{\arccos \frac{x_1}{a}}_{z\ =\ \arccos \frac{x_2}{a}} $$

where $$E(z \mid m)$$ is the incomplete elliptic integral of the second kind with parameter $$m=k^{2}.$$

Some lower and upper bounds on the circumference of the canonical ellipse $$\ x^2/a^2 + y^2/b^2 = 1\ $$ with $$\ a \geq b\ $$ are $$\begin{align} 2\pi b &\le C \le 2\pi a\, \\ \pi (a+b) &\le C \le 4(a+b)\, \\ 4\sqrt{a^2+b^2\ } &\le C \le \sqrt{2\ } \pi \sqrt{a^2 + b^2\ } ~. \end{align}$$

Here the upper bound $$\ 2\pi a\ $$ is the circumference of a circumscribed concentric circle passing through the endpoints of the ellipse's major axis, and the lower bound $$4\sqrt{a^2+b^2}$$ is the perimeter of an inscribed rhombus with vertices at the endpoints of the major and the minor axes.

Curvature
The curvature is given by $$\kappa = \frac{1}{a^2 b^2}\left(\frac{x^2}{a^4}+\frac{y^2}{b^4}\right)^{-\frac{3}{2}}\ ,$$ radius of curvature at point $$(x,y)$$: $$\rho = a^2 b^2 \left(\frac{x^{2}}{a^4} + \frac{y^{2}}{b^4}\right)^\frac{3}{2} = \frac{1}{a^4 b^4} \sqrt{\left(a^4 y^{2} + b^4 x^{2}\right)^3} \ .$$

Radius of curvature at the two vertices $$(\pm a,0)$$ and the centers of curvature: $$\rho_0 = \frac{b^2}{a}=p\, \qquad \left(\pm\frac{c^2}{a}\,\bigg|\,0\right)\ .$$

Radius of curvature at the two co-vertices $$(0,\pm b)$$ and the centers of curvature: $$\rho_1 = \frac{a^2}{b}\, \qquad \left(0\,\bigg|\,\pm\frac{c^2}{b}\right)\ .$$

In triangle geometry
Ellipses appear in triangle geometry as
 * 1) Steiner ellipse: ellipse through the vertices of the triangle with center at the centroid,
 * 2) inellipses: ellipses which touch the sides of a triangle.  Special cases are the Steiner inellipse and the Mandart inellipse.

As plane sections of quadrics
Ellipses appear as plane sections of the following quadrics:
 * Ellipsoid
 * Elliptic cone
 * Elliptic cylinder
 * Hyperboloid of one sheet
 * Hyperboloid of two sheets

Elliptical reflectors and acoustics

If the water's surface is disturbed at one focus of an elliptical water tank, the circular waves of that disturbance, after reflecting off the walls, converge simultaneously to a single point: the second focus. This is a consequence of the total travel length being the same along any wall-bouncing path between the two foci.

Similarly, if a light source is placed at one focus of an elliptic mirror, all light rays on the plane of the ellipse are reflected to the second focus. Since no other smooth curve has such a property, it can be used as an alternative definition of an ellipse. (In the special case of a circle with a source at its center all light would be reflected back to the center.) If the ellipse is rotated along its major axis to produce an ellipsoidal mirror (specifically, a prolate spheroid), this property holds for all rays out of the source. Alternatively, a cylindrical mirror with elliptical cross-section can be used to focus light from a linear fluorescent lamp along a line of the paper; such mirrors are used in some document scanners.

Sound waves are reflected in a similar way, so in a large elliptical room a person standing at one focus can hear a person standing at the other focus remarkably well. The effect is even more evident under a vaulted roof shaped as a section of a prolate spheroid. Such a room is called a whisper chamber. The same effect can be demonstrated with two reflectors shaped like the end caps of such a spheroid, placed facing each other at the proper distance. Examples are the National Statuary Hall at the United States Capitol (where John Quincy Adams is said to have used this property for eavesdropping on political matters); the Mormon Tabernacle at Temple Square in Salt Lake City, Utah; at an exhibit on sound at the Museum of Science and Industry in Chicago; in front of the University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign Foellinger Auditorium; and also at a side chamber of the Palace of Charles V, in the Alhambra.

Planetary orbits
In the 17th century, Johannes Kepler discovered that the orbits along which the planets travel around the Sun are ellipses with the Sun [approximately] at one focus, in his first law of planetary motion. Later, Isaac Newton explained this as a corollary of his law of universal gravitation.

More generally, in the gravitational two-body problem, if the two bodies are bound to each other (that is, the total energy is negative), their orbits are similar ellipses with the common barycenter being one of the foci of each ellipse. The other focus of either ellipse has no known physical significance. The orbit of either body in the reference frame of the other is also an ellipse, with the other body at the same focus.

Keplerian elliptical orbits are the result of any radially directed attraction force whose strength is inversely proportional to the square of the distance. Thus, in principle, the motion of two oppositely charged particles in empty space would also be an ellipse. (However, this conclusion ignores losses due to electromagnetic radiation and quantum effects, which become significant when the particles are moving at high speed.)

For elliptical orbits, useful relations involving the eccentricity $$e$$ are: $$\begin{align} e &= \frac{r_a - r_p}{r_a + r_p} = \frac{r_a - r_p}{2a} \\ r_a &= (1 + e)a \\ r_p &= (1 - e)a \end{align}$$

where
 * $$r_a$$ is the radius at apoapsis, i.e., the farthest distance of the orbit to the barycenter of the system, which is a focus of the ellipse
 * $$r_p$$ is the radius at periapsis, the closest distance
 * $$a$$ is the length of the semi-major axis

Also, in terms of $$r_a$$ and $$r_p$$, the semi-major axis $$a$$ is their arithmetic mean, the semi-minor axis $$b$$ is their geometric mean, and the semi-latus rectum $$\ell$$ is their harmonic mean. In other words, $$\begin{align} a &= \frac{r_a + r_p}{2} \\[2pt] b &= \sqrt{r_a r_p} \\[2pt] \ell &= \frac{2}{\frac{1}{r_a} + \frac{1}{r_p}} = \frac{2r_ar_p}{r_a + r_p}. \end{align}$$

Harmonic oscillators
The general solution for a harmonic oscillator in two or more dimensions is also an ellipse. Such is the case, for instance, of a long pendulum that is free to move in two dimensions; of a mass attached to a fixed point by a perfectly elastic spring; or of any object that moves under influence of an attractive force that is directly proportional to its distance from a fixed attractor. Unlike Keplerian orbits, however, these "harmonic orbits" have the center of attraction at the geometric center of the ellipse, and have fairly simple equations of motion.

Phase visualization
In electronics, the relative phase of two sinusoidal signals can be compared by feeding them to the vertical and horizontal inputs of an oscilloscope. If the Lissajous figure display is an ellipse, rather than a straight line, the two signals are out of phase.

Elliptical gears
Two non-circular gears with the same elliptical outline, each pivoting around one focus and positioned at the proper angle, turn smoothly while maintaining contact at all times. Alternatively, they can be connected by a link chain or timing belt, or in the case of a bicycle the main chainring may be elliptical, or an ovoid similar to an ellipse in form. Such elliptical gears may be used in mechanical equipment to produce variable angular speed or torque from a constant rotation of the driving axle, or in the case of a bicycle to allow a varying crank rotation speed with inversely varying mechanical advantage.

Elliptical bicycle gears make it easier for the chain to slide off the cog when changing gears.

An example gear application would be a device that winds thread onto a conical bobbin on a spinning machine. The bobbin would need to wind faster when the thread is near the apex than when it is near the base.

Optics

 * In a material that is optically anisotropic (birefringent), the refractive index depends on the direction of the light. The dependency can be described by an index ellipsoid. (If the material is optically isotropic, this ellipsoid is a sphere.)
 * In lamp-pumped solid-state lasers, elliptical cylinder-shaped reflectors have been used to direct light from the pump lamp (coaxial with one ellipse focal axis) to the active medium rod (coaxial with the second focal axis).
 * In laser-plasma produced EUV light sources used in microchip lithography, EUV light is generated by plasma positioned in the primary focus of an ellipsoid mirror and is collected in the secondary focus at the input of the lithography machine.

Statistics and finance
In statistics, a bivariate random vector $$(X, Y)$$ is jointly elliptically distributed if its iso-density contours—loci of equal values of the density function—are ellipses. The concept extends to an arbitrary number of elements of the random vector, in which case in general the iso-density contours are ellipsoids. A special case is the multivariate normal distribution. The elliptical distributions are important in finance because if rates of return on assets are jointly elliptically distributed then all portfolios can be characterized completely by their mean and variance—that is, any two portfolios with identical mean and variance of portfolio return have identical distributions of portfolio return.

Computer graphics
Drawing an ellipse as a graphics primitive is common in standard display libraries, such as the MacIntosh QuickDraw API, and Direct2D on Windows. Jack Bresenham at IBM is most famous for the invention of 2D drawing primitives, including line and circle drawing, using only fast integer operations such as addition and branch on carry bit. M. L. V. Pitteway extended Bresenham's algorithm for lines to conics in 1967. Another efficient generalization to draw ellipses was invented in 1984 by Jerry Van Aken.

In 1970 Danny Cohen presented at the "Computer Graphics 1970" conference in England a linear algorithm for drawing ellipses and circles. In 1971, L. B. Smith published similar algorithms for all conic sections and proved them to have good properties. These algorithms need only a few multiplications and additions to calculate each vector.

It is beneficial to use a parametric formulation in computer graphics because the density of points is greatest where there is the most curvature. Thus, the change in slope between each successive point is small, reducing the apparent "jaggedness" of the approximation.

Composite Bézier curves may also be used to draw an ellipse to sufficient accuracy, since any ellipse may be construed as an affine transformation of a circle. The spline methods used to draw a circle may be used to draw an ellipse, since the constituent Bézier curves behave appropriately under such transformations.
 * Drawing with Bézier paths:

Optimization theory
It is sometimes useful to find the minimum bounding ellipse on a set of points. The ellipsoid method is quite useful for solving this problem.

title: Ellipse


text:
Extension

Extension, extend or extended may refer to:

Logic or set theory

 * Axiom of extensionality
 * Extensible cardinal
 * Extension (model theory)
 * Extension (predicate logic), the set of tuples of values that satisfy the predicate
 * Extension (semantics), the set of things to which a property applies
 * Extension by definitions
 * Extensional definition, a definition that enumerates every individual a term applies to
 * Extensionality

Other uses

 * Extension of a function, defined on a larger domain
 * Extension of a polyhedron, in geometry
 * Exterior algebra, Grassmann's theory of extension, in geometry
 * Field extension, in Galois theory
 * Group extension, in abstract algebra and homological algebra
 * Homotopy extension property, in topology
 * Kolmogorov extension theorem, in probability theory
 * Linear extension, in order theory
 * Sheaf extension, in algebraic geometry
 * Tietze extension theorem, in topology
 * Whitney extension theorem, in differential geometry

Music

 * Extension (music), notes that fit outside the standard range
 * Extended (Solar Fields album), 2005
 * Extension (George Braith album), 1964
 * Extension (Clare Fischer album), 1963
 * Extensions (Ahmad Jamal album), 1965
 * Extensions, a 1969 album by Mystic Moods Orchestra
 * Extensions (McCoy Tyner album), 1970
 * Extensions (Dave Holland album), 1988
 * Extensions (The Manhattan Transfer album), 1979
 * Extension (The Extended Mixes), 2023 album reissue by Kylie Minogue

Places

 * Extension, British Columbia, a village near Regional District of Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada
 * Extension, Louisiana, unincorporated community, United States

Science

 * Extension (geology), relating to the pulling apart of the Earth's crust and lithosphere
 * Extension (anatomy), a movement at a joint that increases the angle between the two ends of the joint; the opposite of flexion
 * Extension locus, the gene locus of Melanocortin 1 receptor

Other uses

 * Agricultural Extension
 * Browser extension, a small software module for customizing a web browser
 * Building extension
 * Continuing education, or extension school, a school for continuing education
 * Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service, a former division of the U.S. Department of Agriculture
 * Extension (metaphysics), the property of stretching out or taking up space
 * Extension (telephone), telephone line attached to a main line or to a PBX or Centrex system
 * Extension cord, power cable with a plug on one end and one or more sockets on the other end
 * Eyelash extensions, material applied to eyelashes
 * Hair extensions, strands of hair added to existing hair
 * Extension, the building of community capacity by outsiders, for instance agricultural extension
 * Filename extension, for computer file systems

title: Extension