text:
Jumanji

Jumanji is a 1995 British/American film based on Chris Van Allsburg's beloved children's book about two kids who play a magical, jungle-themed board game with a host of dangers that can only be stopped if the game is finished. It was directed by Joe Johnston.
 * ''Directed by Joe Johnston. Written by Chris Van Allsburg and Greg Taylor.

An Adventure for Those Who Seek to Find a Way to Leave Their World Behind.

Alan Parrish

 * In the jungle, you must wait, until the dice read 5 or 8.
 * STOP GIVING ME THINGS THAT COME APART!!!
 * I've got it! Colonel Mustard in the library with the wrench. [laughs] Clue.
 * You think monkeys, mosquitoes, and lions are bad? That's just the beginning. I've seen things you've only seen in your nightmares. Things you can't even imagine. Things you can't even see. There are things that hunt you in the night. Then something screams. Then you hear them eating, and you hope to God that you're not dessert. Afraid? You don't know what afraid is. You will not last 5 minutes without me.

Others

 * Judy: We barely even knew our parents. They were always away. Skiing in St. Moritz, gambling in Monte Carlo, safariing in darkest Africa. We didn't even know if they loved us. But when the sheik's yacht went down, they managed to write us a really beautiful goodbye note that was found floating in a champagne bottle amongst the debris.
 * Carl: [after a jungle vine takes his car away] FINE!! TAKE IT!!

Dialogue

 * Judy: Well, we found out why you got this house so cheap. 26 years ago, a kid named Alan Parrish used to live here. Then 1 day, he just disappeared 'cause his parents chopped him up in little pieces and hid him in the walls.
 * Aunt Nora: [to Judy] Okay, that's it. I'm sick and tired of your lies, young lady. You're grounded.
 * Judy: Fine, there's nowhere to go in this stupid town anyway. And just for your information, that wasn't a lie.

 * Carl: [Alan jumps onto Carl's squad car in his jungle garb] Get down off my car, please. And get up on the sidewalk.
 * Alan: What year is it?
 * Carl: It was brand-new.
 * Alan: No. What year is it?
 * Judy: Uh, 1995. Remember?
 * Alan: 1995?
 * Carl: You got some ID? Oh, lemme guess, you probably left it in the other Tarzan outfit, right?
 * Alan: [to himself] 26 years!
 * Carl: Are you from around here?
 * Alan: I was. But I've been in Jumanji.
 * Judy: Indonesia. He was in the Peace Corps.
 * Alan: [reads Carl's nametag] Bentley.
 * [Carl walks over to Judy and Peter]
 * Alan: [whispers to himself] Carl Bentley, the Soleman!
 * Carl: [about Alan, still dressed in jungle garb] Is this man related to you?
 * Judy: Yes, sir. He's our... uncle.
 * Carl: Does he always dress like that?
 * Judy: Well, yeah. He's a... vegetarian.
 * [Alan watches as a pair of monkeys climb into Carl's squad car]
 * Alan: GET OUTTA THERE!!! [screeches and makes monkey noises; to Judy, Peter, and Carl] Monkeys! Monkeys!
 * Carl: [points at his temple] Is he all right upstairs?
 * Judy: Uh, he suffered a head injury a few months ago.
 * [Alan continues to make monkey sounds to force the monkeys out of Carl's car, only for the monkeys to fire Carl's rifle and drive off]
 * Carl: Hey! Hey! What the-? What? Don't you move! [he runs after his car to monkeys] Real! NOW! Look out!
 * Alan: [mocking Carl] "Don't move. Don't move." [he runs off]
 * Carl: NOW!?
 * Judy: Hey, wait a minute! Where are you going?
 * Alan: To find my parents!
 * Judy: [to Peter] Come on.
 * [Judy and Peter follow Alan]

 * Sarah: WHOOOOOOAAAAAHHHHH!! [Alan grabs Sarah's arms] Oohh! Get your hands off me!
 * Alan: The game is not over yet, Sarah!

 * Alan: Not the game! [Alan runs after a pelican who has the game in his beak] WHY DIDN'T YOU GRAB THE GAME, PETER?!
 * Sarah: Just ignore him, honey. He's a Libra. [to Alan] Where are you going?!
 * Alan: He'll head for water!
 * Sarah: Go.
 * Judy: [the phone rings; answers it] Hello?
 * Aunt Nora: Judy, it's Nora. Where have you been?!
 * Judy: [in a fake British accent] I'm sorry, dear. You have the wrong number. [hangs up and runs after Alan and co.] Wait for me!

 [Peter has set the game on a stump and rolled the dice]

 * Peter: Judy! [Sarah and Judy run over]
 * Sarah: What happened?
 * Peter: I thought I could end the game myself. I was only 10 spaces away.
 * Judy: [reads a notice in the center of the board] A law of Jumanji having been broken, you will slip back even more than your token.
 * Sarah: You tried to cheat?
 * Peter: No! I tried to drop the dice so they'd land on 12.
 * Sarah: Oh, okay, honey. Well, that would be cheating.
 * Judy: Peter, your hands! Look at your hands! [Peter sees monkey fur growing on his hands as penalty for cheating]

 * Alan: Where's Sir Sav-a-Lot?
 * Carl: Monroe and Elm!
 * Alan: The Episcopal Church.
 * Carl: No, it's not a church anymore. Now it's a Speedy Burger. Or at least it was. I don't know what's left of it. People in this town are goin' loopy.

 * Sarah: Alan, you wrestled an alligator for me.
 * Alan: It was a crocodile. Alligators don't have that little fringe on their hind leg.
 * Sarah: My mistake.

 * [sitting down to play the game]
 * Sarah: Alan, please, last time I played this game, it ruined my life.
 * Alan: [laughs] It ruined your life? "In the jungle, you must wait 'til the dice read five or eight."
 * Sarah: I was a little girl, Alan. You disappeared, and a bunch of bats surrounded me and chased me down the street. I was afraid. I'm sorry, Alan. No one believed me. I was all alone.
 * Alan: So was I. For 26 years, Sarah.

 * [Judy is reading the rules of Jumanji as Peter looks out the window to watch the remaining monkeys disperse]
 * Judy: [reads] Adventurers beware: do not begin unless you intend to finish. The exciting consequences of the game, will vanish only when a player has reached Jumanji and called out its name.
 * Peter: The monkeys are gone.
 * Judy: Good.

 * Judy: I don't like the sound of that.
 * Peter: Judy, someone's in here.
 * Judy: It's not real, Peter. It's a hallucination. Run, Peter! Run!

 * Van Pelt: Don't move. Stand up. [Alan does so] What's in your hand? Drop it. [Alan releases the dice; one hits the board and lands on 1, while the other tumbles down into a nearby staircase] End of the line, Sonny Jim. Game's up. Stop running.
 * Alan: No.
 * Van Pelt: Aren't you afraid?
 * Alan: I'm terrified. But, my father told me... You should always face what you're afraid of. [the dice keeps rolling down into the fissure]
 * Van Pelt: [laughs] Good lad. You're finally acting like a man. Any last words? [the dice eventually stops, and lands on 2; this causes Alan's piece to move to the center of the board, where the word "Jumanji" appears, signaling that Alan has won the game)
 * Alan: Jumanji.
 * Van Pelt: Huh?
 * Alan: Jumanji. [Van Pelt fires]
 * Sarah: [jumping in front of the bullet] No, Alan, no!
 * [the bullet stops in mid-air and gets sucked into the game, as does Van Pelt and all the wild animals released, who fly in through a nearby window and converge on a maelstrom over the center of the board, which draws in everything it released]

Taglines

 * A game for those who seek to find a way to leave their world behind.
 * Roll the dice and unleash the excitement!
 * It's a jungle in there!
 * Are you game?

Cast

 * Robin Williams – Adult Alan Parrish
 * Jonathan Hyde – Samuel Alan Parrish/Hunter Van Pelt
 * Bonnie Hunt – Sarah Whittle
 * Kirsten Dunst – Judy Shepherd
 * Bradley Pierce – Peter Shepherd
 * Bebe Neuwirth – Aunt Nora Shepherd
 * David Alan Grier – Carl Bentley
 * Adam Hann-Byrd – Young Alan Parrish
 * Laura Bell Bundy – Young Sarah Whittle
 * Patricia Clarkson – Carol Parrish

title: Jumanji


text:
User talk:Raiden Grey

~ MosheZadka (Talk) 05:31, 24 November 2005 (UTC)

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: User talk:Raiden Grey


text:
Wikiquote talk:Marking problematic pages

Re: Lexx cleanup tag
The following discussion has been copied, by me, from User talk:Jeffq, because it seemed to be relevant to the standards of marking problmatic pages. ~ MosheZadka (Talk) 05:35, 24 November 2005 (UTC)

I'm not clear on why you added the cleanup tag to Lexx''. The article is certainly in need of quotes from other characters, and could use some dialog, which is why I added the stub tag, but these are not formatting issues. Could you post a note on its talk page to explain? Thanks. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 04:41, 16 November 2005 (UTC)''

 * Thanks for your question! I added a note to the talk page. Please remove the cleanup tag if you disagree with my reasoning there. ~ MosheZadka (Talk) 04:50, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

 * I don't know if you noticed, but I actually put some work into something like that: Guide to layout/Draft. Any thoughts and comments you have on this guide would be useful. Once I move it out of draft, I intend to link all cleanup templates to this guide (possibly to sections, I'm not sure) -- the guide was originally written because many people asked me "why did you add cleanup tag?". Thanks for your help and care ~ MosheZadka (Talk) 08:10, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

 * I admit I'm behind on studying and commenting on all the new activity that folks (mainly you!) have been working on. The draft WQ:GtL looks like a succinct summary of the main points of the different formats, which is an excellent idea. However, I believe it's generally good wiki practice to post a specific reason for adding a cleanup tag, especially if it's not obvious. (But what is "obvious", you ask? Good question.) I've certainly been known to tag some articles without explanation, though I try to do that only when the format or content is so bad that even a wiki novice could understand the concern (if not necessarily the solution). On the other hand, I understand how much time a large-scale cleanup-tagging effort takes, and just getting the tags on the articles raises their visibility for attention. I'm just a bit concerned about pointing folks to a concentrated summary without specific citations of problems. I guess it's just my ongoing concern about the tension between encouraging new users and requiring reasonable formatting, which for Wikiquote can be quite cumbersome. (Even an old hand like myself was initially confused about which ones of the several dozen TV-show structure elements was not being followed in a TV stub.) Oh, well. Don't stop your tremendous efforts on my account! ~ Jeff Q (talk) 08:36, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

 * You're probably right that cleanup tags should have reasons. I will try to be more careful about writing summary of issues in the future, at any rate. Thanks ~ MosheZadka (Talk) 08:49, 16 November 2005 (UTC)


text:
User:Slinger~enwikiquote

Hi, I am Slinger. I am more active on the English and Dutch Wikipedias. If you want to leave me a message, please leave it on my Dutch Wikipedia user talk page or my English Wikipedia user talk page.

title: User:Slinger~enwikiquote


text:
User talk:Redefined89

Notes to All: I am away for 3 days. I will continue working on CAD when i return.

Hope you don't miss me ;)

Redefined89 13:03, 24 November 2005 (UTC)

title: User talk:Redefined89


text:
Naiqama Lalabalavu

Ratu Naiqama Lalabalavu is a Fijian chief and politician. He holds the title of Tui Cakau (one of the three highest in the chiefly hierarchy) and leads the Conservative Alliance Party.

Parliamentary speech, 17 November 2005 (excerpts)

 * Source: Fiji Sun, 24 November 2005

 * The Reconciliation, Tolerance and Unit Bill is about unity. It is about forgiveness and working together. Above all, it is about the security of our future - different races, one nation. That is what the Bill is all about.

 * As a traditional leader, I take slight that, at times, our traditional authority have been abused and exploited by the powers that be. While our traditional authority has always been respected, sadly at times, it has also been abused.

 * I remember well, that during the 2000 crisis in Labasa, the late Tui Labasa and I amongst a few other Vanua Levu chiefs were approached both by the Police and Military to intercede in the face off between the soldiers at Sukanaivalu Barracks. We accepted their request and invitation when they sought our assistance traditionally. We went and did what we were asked to do, which was to diffuse the volatility of the situation there in Labasa. I stand here today without any hesitation at all to say that had it not been for our positive contribution, Labasa would have been looted, burnt and soldiers would have been killed and probably maimed each other. Yet, when all was brought to normal, we were charged and convicted for offences, we were asked for assistance and in return went to prison for it.

 * For me, as prisoner number LB32/05 at Vaturekuka, is something I will live with for the rest of my life, without any regret or shame because I do not only believe, but I know, and I repeat I know, that what I did then was right because if I did not do anything then, part of my people who were soldiers at the Sukanaivalu Barracks then would have been dead.

 * I feel there is honour and dignity in being sent to prison because the law says, even though I know I did what I had to do then.

 * I bear no malice towards anyone, be it my jailer or the magistrate who sent me in or my political opponent. I do not hate or despite anyone.

title: Naiqama Lalabalavu


text:
Wikiquote:Votes for deletion archive/Just war

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: keep Just war theory, redirect Just war, delete Just War Theory. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 12:12, 24 November 2005 (UTC)

Just war
Redirect. Just war → Just War Theory → Just war theory. I'm not sure if it is a good idea to turn it into a redirect to "Just war theory". --Aphaia 17:34, 4 November 2005 (UTC)

 * The correct name is either "Just war" or "Just war theory", and the latter is better imho because it's a common phrase. All other capitalized names, i.e. "Just War" and "Just War Theory" and "Just War theory" are wrong. The redirects were created because I wanted to conform with the wikipedia article name, and they changed the name there a couple of times. This was a bad idea though, as the people there seem to be clueless about the correct use of capital letters. The current name on wikipedia is "Just War theory", which doesn't have a wikiquote redirect, so the wikiquote template box doesn't work in the other direction (it works from wq to wp because wp has a redirect article for the correct name). iddo999 22:25, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

 * Vote closed. Result: keep Just war theory as article, redirect Just war to that article, delete Just War Theory only if doing so automatically goes to article, and verify WP and WQ link boxes correctly link to their counterparts, per vote analysis below. Final report will follow shortly. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 12:12, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Final report: with "Just War Theory" deleted, all capitalization versions properly present the sole article within Wikiquote. No variation except the actual article title works from WP to WQ, but the only way to fix this is to create redirects from every variation that WP may have, which isn't usual practice, besides which the current WP title is "Just War theory", which didn't even exist as a redirect here. I've verified that the WQ→WP and WP→WQ article links are now completely working, so I'll leave "JWT" deleted unless someone objects. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 12:39, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete all the redirects, except for the "just war" redirect. iddo999 22:25, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep "Just war", delete "Just War Theory" and "Just War theory". I've heard the phrase "just war"; I've never heard "just war theory", although I can believe it's common. But I'm certain that many who might think of looking for quotes on this topic would enter "just war", and that's one purpose of a redirect. As for the capitalization problem, if we delete all versions but one, I believe MediaWiki will automatically present the correct article even if the capitalization is wrong. (If we have two versions, I think it fails because it doesn't know which to assume.) If there's a problem with linking to Wikipedia, we can either use or, better yet, move the WP article to the correct capitalization. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 07:19, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Perhaps we should keep exactly one redirect, between "just war" and "just war theory", depending on which one of these would contain the article. I personally think that "just war theory" is better, as in the wikipedia article, but it's not a big deal either way. iddo999 14:05, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
 * What I'm saying is that there is no need for multiple capitalization versions of both phrases. One "Just war" redirect to "Just war theory", and no other capitalization variations, should have exactly the same result as if we'd had every likely capitalization variation of both phrases. In fact, it's better to have only the two, because redirects display the line "Redirected from...", whereas the MediaWiki-driven matching will take you straight to the correct form, regardless of the way you capitalized the phrase. But you need to have only one variation per phrase for this to work. Example: enter "Just War", and you'll see that MediaWiki assumes you meant "Just war" (note that it says "Redirected from Just war ", not "Redirected from Just War "), because there's only a single variation of that phrase as an article title. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 15:57, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Clarification: When I said keep "Just war", I meant as a redirect. When I said delete "Just War Theory" and "Just War theory", I was implicitly agreeing with whoever wrote the paragraph above the "vote closes" that "Just war theory" be kept as the main article. However, I don't really care which of "Just war" or "Just war theory" is primary, so long as we have only one article and one redirect. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 22:55, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Apologies. I wrote the comment above, and forgot to sign it when signing my vote. I also created this page, btw:) Thanks for the info on mediawiki auto redirecting capital letters. As I mentioned, I like the "just war theory" title better than "just war", but "just war" is also good. Please add more quotes there, instead of wasting energy to determine the correct name:) iddo999 00:22, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep "Just war," delete "Just War theory," and redirect from "Just war theory" (only because it is listed this way in WP and people might search for it here after reading that article. BUt I would agree that the proper title for this set of quotes is merely "Just war." UDScott 19:20, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

VOTE ANALYSIS: This is our month for confusing votes. First, allow me to summarize this vote's context. The 3 existing articles on WQ are, as Aphaia listed: Wikipedia's article is "Just War theory" (which doesn't exist here), they have a mess of redirects (in both senses of the word "mess"), and we don't know what the final name of their article will be. As best I understand our discussion, we have the following votes: I believe the following can be extracted from this: Therefore, I propose to close this vote with the following interpretation and subsequent actions: I'm asking my fellow sysops (who happen to be the voters as well) to review my analysis to see if they concur. Unless someone objects before 24 November 2005, 12:00 (UTC), I will close this vote with the above interpretation and take the stated actions. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 10:19, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Just war theory (the current article)
 * Just War Theory (currently a redirect)
 * Just war (currently a double-redirect)
 * iddo999, Jeff Q: Just war theory is best article name; redirect Just war to it; delete all other redirects.
 * UDScott: Just war is best article name; redirect Just war theory to it; delete Just War theory. (Both iddo999 and Jeff Q consider this article/redirect combination acceptable, but it would entail an article-title swap, which seems unwise since we might want to swap it back if WP changes their minds again.)
 * Aphaia: No actual vote, but the nomination of Just war for deletion, plus asking about making this a direct redirect to Just war theory, implies favoring iddo999 and Jeff Q's position on these 2 pages, with no comment on any variations.
 * Most (3-1) want Just war theory as the article (the current state), and Just war to redirect to it.
 * Half want Just War Theory deleted. (UDScott may have meant "Just War Theory" when he said delete the non-existent "Just War theory"; that would make it 3-0 [Aphaia not commenting].) As long as it exists, however, it may cause MediaWiki auto-redirection problems for the many variations people might try.
 * Most (3-0; Aphaia not commenting) don't want a Just War theory redirect. (If the above possible interpretation of UDScott's vote is accurate, this one is 2-0, with 2 not specifically commenting on this variation. But nobody suggested creating it, either, so it should probably stay non-existent.)
 * 1) Redirect Just war to Just war theory.
 * 2) Delete Just War Theory and test all possible capitalizations for auto-redirection. If they work, we didn't need it anyway. If they don't, restore "Just War Theory".
 * 3) Ensure that both the WP and WQ articles link directly to the current articles on the other project, using the  templates.
 * I've reviewed the votes and analysis: you are right, it is confusing, but it seems you have summarised it correctly. Thanks! ~ MosheZadka (Talk) 10:39, 21 November 2005 (UTC)

 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


text:
Wikiquote:Votes for deletion archive/User:RyanCahn

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: delete. ~ MosheZadka (Talk) 14:18, 15 November 2005 (UTC)

User:RyanCahn

 * Delete Stupid biography! RyanCahn
 * Untimestamped signature confirmed coming from cited user in 22:43, 2 October 2005 (UTC) edit. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 23:57, 2 October 2005 (UTC)

 * Comment: invalid nomination, so I assume we can reject it; personally I suspect this user want only to make another trouble now. I prefer to keep it but put a new version with . Aphaia 23:48, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
 * VOTE CLOSED: Result: delete but user is warned that further edits will be watched for with an eye to disruption (3 delete, large consensus that user is a trouble maker) ~ MosheZadka (Talk) 14:18, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. I don't see how this is an invalid nomination, as the user himself is requesting deletion of his user page. RyanCahn has already given us enough reason to block him per policy. I was going to speedy-delete the user page, but I realized that case #10 of Wikiquote:Speedy deletions allows for user subpage deletions, but not necessarily user page deletions. Is there any Wikimedia project-wide policy on user page deletions? ~ Jeff Q (talk) 23:57, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
 * I meant mainly 1) lack of timestamp 2) lack of link, but perhaps I was too bureaucratic. I don't oppose to accept it. Anyway it is a request by user himself. Aphaia 03:50, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete I always took the "sub" page deletion policy as "sub*page", and not just "sub+page", but maybe I was wrong. ~ MosheZadka (Talk) 03:27, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: I think subpage means user:somebody/XX, but it is a good occasion to make sure what each of us think about this description. As for project-wide policy, there is no such thing as far as I know. I don't know the policy on English project than ours (we have almost nothing except it is still under policy as well as other pages). On Japanese Wikipedia, it has a special request page, but it doesn't make a sense here due to the project size supposedly, requests are to be reviewed for a week as well other requests, but the discussion s aren't archived because most of requests are related to some their private issues (a typical case is: one wrote once his private information and later realized its potential security flaw). --Aphaia 03:50, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. I would think that we could delete any user page, user talk, or user subpage or user talk subpage requested for deletion by the user and to which the user is the only contributor. But perhaps that interpretation is only my own. Rmhermen 13:21, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


text:
Talk:Just war

This article was preserved after a vote for its deletion. See its archived VfD entry for details. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 12:49, 24 November 2005 (UTC)

title: Talk:Just war


text:
Wikiquote:Votes for deletion archive/Broken links

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: delete everything. ~ MosheZadka (Talk) 05:13, 20 November 2005 (UTC)

Broken links
Broken/Wikipedia:Other Language Wikiquotes, Broken/Wikipedia:Template and Broken/Wikipedia:Help. I'm convinced we don't need them.

 * Vote closed: Result: delete everything, including new additions (4 deletes, no dissent) ~ MosheZadka (Talk) 05:13, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete --Aphaia 17:34, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
 * I struck out Aphaia's vote, because of her vote below just to make sure it isn't counted twice by accident (this is going to be a clear delete, but we better avoid giving any impression of not following procedure) ~ MosheZadka (Talk) 08:13, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete the bunch of them. ~ MosheZadka (Talk) 21:57, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete eos (delete them all). I thought we got rid of all these leftovers already. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 07:24, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Oh, no, User:Aphaia and I only find them when they cause problems: I was looking for "articles without category" and she, I suspect, was looking through "list of double redirects". Each sysop, it seems, has his or her own "favourite" problems. If anyone wants to complete the above list, they would be welcome to. ~ MosheZadka (Talk) 08:53, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Ah, I see. Well, one of my favorite things is using "All pages" to find article groups, so I belatedly used this just now to come up with the rest of the leftover "Broken/Wikipedia" crowd:
 * Broken/Wikipedia:Announcements
 * Broken/Wikipedia:FAQ
 * Broken/Wikipedia:Logo
 * Broken/Wikipedia:Sandbox
 * Broken/Wikipedia:Utilities
 * Broken/Wikipedia:Village pump
 * Broken/Wikipedia:Welcome, newcomers
 * Broken/Wikipedia:What Wikiquote is not
 * I recommend we delete these as well. (Sorry I didn't think of this sooner.) ~ Jeff Q (talk) 16:10, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete original ones and new additions: concur with Jeff ~ MosheZadka (Talk) 20:38, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete all, including those that Jeff found. UDScott 19:22, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete all, including those additional stuffs. Jeff you beat me ;o The proper way to fix them was definitely to council "Allpages". --Aphaia 06:35, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


text:
User talk:Tarmo888~enwikiquote

~ MosheZadka (Talk) 13:07, 24 November 2005 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Tarmo888. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Tarmo888~enwikiquote that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:36, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 05:59, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tarmo888~enwikiquote


text:
User:Plumbago

- Welcome to Plumbago's user page - Unfortunately, I don't visit Wikiquote all that often. You're better off visiting me at the Wikipedia

title: User:Plumbago


text:
User talk:Plumbago

~ MosheZadka (Talk) 14:12, 24 November 2005 (UTC)

title: User talk:Plumbago


text:
User talk:Slinger~enwikiquote

~ MosheZadka (Talk) 14:30, 24 November 2005 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Slinger. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Slinger~enwikiquote that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:36, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 05:58, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Slinger~enwikiquote


text:
User:MosheZadka/Formatting

Problem pages

 * El Goonish Shive
 * Passions
 * Ctrl Alt Del (in progress)
 * Dinosaur Comics

Issues presented

 * Web comics -- splitting, dialogue, etc.
 * Day time TV shows have lots of episodes.

title: User:MosheZadka/Formatting


text:
User talk:Kobayashi~enwikiquote

~ MosheZadka (Talk) 19:33, 24 November 2005 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Kobayashi. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Kobayashi~enwikiquote that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:27, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 05:51, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kobayashi~enwikiquote


text:
Talk:Pokey the Penguin

I've added a cleanup tag because even though there is not yet wide consensus on formatting webcomic quotations, this is far from any rough consensus, and is plain problematic: ~ MosheZadka (Talk) 19:58, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
 * No adequate sourcing
 * No evidence of sorting

I cleaned it up a bit, sourced most of the quotes and sorted them. -RandomCowboy

Is the quote "HURRY UP OLD BEAN! FETCH MY KEYS AND DRIVING CAP POST-HASTE!" definitely from Chicken Delicious? The source is very ambiguous. I suggest that 'Chicken Delicious' be changed to 'Chicken Delicious or Pokey' to reflect this.Quendus 16:13, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

It is rather difficult to discern. --RandomCowboy

I decided to be bold. HOORJ. Quendus 14:55, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

title: Talk:Pokey the Penguin


text:
Paul Saffo

Paul Saffo (born 1954) is an American technology forecaster, essayist, and Consulting Associate Professor at Stanford University.

Quotes

 * Back in the mid-1700s, Samuel Johnson observed that there were two kinds of knowledge: that which you know, and that which you know where to get. It was a moment when cheap and abundant print coupled with reliable postal networks triggered an information explosion that dramatically changed the way people thought. [...] Now the Internet is changing how we think again. Just as print took over the once-human task of knowing, cyberspace is assuming the task of knowing where to get what we seek. [...] Now we revel in search, but most of what we search for isn't worth seeking, as the top search lists on Google, Yahoo and Bing make clear. [...] The Internet has changed our thinking, but if it is to be a change for the better, we must add a third kind of knowledge to Johnson's list — the knowledge of what matters.
 * "A Third Kind of Knowledge", in The Edge Annual Question—2010: How Is the Internet Changing the Way You Think?, January 2010
 * The future belongs to neither the conduit or content players, but those who control the filtering, searching and sense-making tools we will rely on to navigate through the expanses of cyberspace.
 * Wired Magazine: 3/1994 "It's the Context, Stupid."

title: Paul Saffo


text:
Wikiquote:Votes for deletion archive/The Clapper

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: delete. — Jeffq 08:17, 21 November 2005 (UTC)

The Clapper
One quote without any kind of attribution or source information. ~ MosheZadka (Talk) 06:03, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

 * Vote closed. Results: delete (2 Deletes; no dissent). Moved quote to Advertising slogans and copied into The Clapper after removing its Wikiquote "collection" link. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 08:17, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete unless actual quotes added and page made into proper theme page. ~ MosheZadka (Talk) 06:03, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete after moving sole quote to Advertising slogans, which is why we have that article. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 06:54, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


text:
Azumanga Daioh

Azumanga Daioh (2002) (Japanese: あずまんが大王) is a Japanese anime series about the passage of a group of girls through a prestigious Japanese high school.

Miss Yukari [1.1]

 * Yukari: Damn you, [bicycle] chain. I'll show you one day.

 * Yukari: Hey, I said you could ask anything, but my measurements are top secret! Not that I'm ashamed, of course. In fact, I dare say they're pretty spectacular. Oh, you impetuous boy! Look what you made me say on the first day!
 * Male Student: What I meant is that your class is next door. This is Class 4. [Yukari slithers away]

 * Chiyo: I like that in high school we get to bring our own lunches. But it's hard getting up early to make it.
 * Kaorin and Female Student: She makes it herself?
 * [Chiyo opens her bento box.]
 * Kaorin and Female Student: And it looks delicious!
 * Kaorin: What is she? Miss Perfect? Superwoman?

 * Female Student: Miss Sakaki is really cool, isn't she!
 * Kaorin: Yeah, she's way better than any of the boys in our class!
 * [Kaorin catches a glimpse of Sakaki's panties and the kitty on the back]
 * Female Student: Kaorin?
 * Kaorin: I just saw something cute...

 * Tomo: Hold on! Sakaki, your boobs are 8cm bigger than mine, so step back 8cm!
 * Kaorin: Hey! That's cheating!
 * Yomi: Eight centimeters...

Osaka's Day [1.2]

 * [Something seems to have caught Osaka's attention and she follows it around the classroom]
 * Kaorin: Osaka, what are you doing?
 * Osaka: You know those tiny bubbles inside your eyes you sometimes catch?
 * [Kaorin sits patiently waiting for the answer]
 * Osaka: Yeah, I'm trackin' them down as we speak.

 * Tomo: Sensei.
 * Yukari: What? What's wrong?
 * Tomo: I smashed that cockroach just now with my textbook.
 * [Tomo's holds up her textbook which shows the smashed cockroach and walks closer to Yukari]
 * Tomo: What should I do?
 * [Yukari screams out of disgust]
 * Yukari: Get away from me! GET AWAY! [She continues to scream]

Nyamo [1.3]

 * Yukari: BASKETBALL! Now is the basketball era! Come sweat with your teacher and live out your youth to its fullest potential!

 * Yukari: We're Team Yukari!
 * Tomo & Yomi: [unenthusiastically] Yay.
 * Osaka: We're Team Sea Slug!
 * Chiyo & Kaorin''': What?!
 * Chiyo: Osaka?
 * Kaorin: But sea slugs are so... [pause]
 * Osaka: Go Team Sea Slug!
 * Chiyo & Kaorin: [even less enthusiastically] Yay.

Pool, Pool, Pool [1.4]

 * Tomo: Kimura-sensei, why did you become a teacher?
 * Kimura: BECAUSE I LIKE HIGH SCHOOL GIRLS THAT'S WHY!

 * Mr. Kimura: Several of the water pipes that run through my house have been leaking quite a bit lately.
 * Nyamo: Oh?
 * Mr. Kimura: The rubber backing has probably grown very brittle and dried out. It tends to do that when it gets old you know.
 * Nyamo: Sure, I Guess so.
 * [long pause]
 * Mr. Kimura: Have you grown brittle and dry...?
 * Nyamo: THAT'S IT, YOU'RE OUT OF HERE!

 * Tomo: Uh huh! Yomi's crazy flexible 'cause her body's made of almost nothing but fat!
 * Yomi: DOUBLE CHOP!
 * [Yomi hits Tomo over the back of the head]
 * Yomi: Quit being so damn RUDE!
 * [Tomo runs away, chased by Yomi]
 * Tomo: Flabby! Hey, it jiggled!
 * Yomi: DOUBLE CHOP!
 * Tomo: Ooow...
 * Nyamo: You two, quit messing around!

Summer Break [1.5]

 * Tomo: That's right! We're stylin' and profilin'!
 * Osaka: But don't you have boyfriends to show off your style to?
 * [Tomo heaves a heavy sigh]

 * Nyamo: So, I'll take three and Yukari will take two.
 * Chiyo: Um... since Yukari-sensei's car looks a bit more spacious, why not put three people over there?
 * Nyamo: Isn't it better for fewer people to die? [The girls gasp.]

 * [After they arrive at Chiyo's sumer home]
 * Yukari: We're here!
 * [Yomi opens the door of the Yukari-mobile]
 * Yomi: We were watching.
 * [Osaka and Chiyo are trembling, visibly traumatized]
 * Osaka: We're not afraid of rollercoasters anymore...after this...you know...

 * Tomo: So, it's Nyamo's turn. Share some of your vast array of adult experiences.
 * Nyamo: [very uncomfortable] Well, I'm single too, so i really don't have any of those stories.
 * Tomo: Darn.
 * Yukari: You weren't single last year. [Nyamo shakes a little]

Sports Fest [1.6]

 * Yukari: Listen up, everyone! I have one word that I want to say to all of you. And that word is... FIRST PLACE!

 * Chiyo and Osaka: [lined up for the three-legged race] Let's do it!
 * [starting gun fires; the girls fall over]
 * Chiyo: Let's take our time and count our steps, okay?
 * Osaka: Okay, nice and slow.
 * Chiyo and Osaka: One --! [they fall over again]

Culture Fest [1.7]

 * Girl: Oh, Ms. Kurosawa!
 * Nyamo: Tell me, how's it holding up?
 * Girl: Well the thing is...
 * Nyamo: Huh?
 * [cuts to Kagura and Mr. Kimura]
 * Mr. Kimura: What is going on here!
 * Kagura: Going on, what do you mean!
 * Mr. Kimura: This is inexcusable!
 * Nyamo: Something wrong?
 * Kagura: Yeah, this guy...
 * Mr. Kimura: Oh, Ms. Kurosawa, I'm so glad you're here!
 * Nyamo: Okay!
 * Mr. Kimura: Please talk some sense into your girls Ms. Kurosawa. I mean don't you find it rather odd? This is the swim team's booth and no one's in a swim suit!
 * Kagura & Nyamo: Uh...
 * Mr. Kimura: Ugh... okay, I'll let the swimsuits go.
 * Kagura: Yes sir!
 * Mr. Kimura: I think I'd like a glass of pool water!
 * Kagura: Sir?
 * Mr. Kimura: POOL WATER! AS IN WATER FROM THE POOL THAT YOU GIRLS HAVE BEEN SWIMMING IN!
 * Kagura: WHAT! We don't have any of that!
 * Mr. Kimura: [deep sigh]

New Year's Dream Special [1.8]

 * Osaka: Chiyo-chan, why are you flying?
 * Chiyo: I'm ten years old!

 * Sakaki: Excuse me, that thing we were talking about, where can I go to find a real cat?
 * Chiyo's dad: A real cat? [He starts to glow, turning blue, purple and red.] Are you saying then that I am a fake cat?
 * Sakaki: I'm sorry please forgive me.
 * [He stops glowing.]
 * Chiyo's dad: No, it is not that I am angry. I am not a fake. [He quickly glows red again and thrashes around in his chair] But do you mean to say that there are cats that are real AND ONES THAT ARE NOT?!
 * Sakaki: Are you sure you're not angry?

Miss Sakaki [1.9]

 * Osaka: Sakaki is absorbing something from you!
 * Chiyo: Sakaki, did you take my height?
 * Sakaki: Uh...no...
 * Chiyo: You took it, right? You took it, right? You took it, right?...Give it back!

Second Year [1.10]

 * Tomo: VIVA LA CLASS SHUFFLE!

 * [Sakaki walks over to a black cat, trying to pet it]
 * Kagura: [leaping in front of Sakaki's face] STUPID FURBALL!!! [the cat runs away] [laughing] That was great!
 * [Sakaki slowly turns her head to face Kagura, her eyes hidden beneath her hair]

Kagura And Sakaki [1.11]

 * [after the two guess names of flowers by the sidewalk]
 * Kagura: Hey, Sakaki. That just now; was that a contest?
 * [Sakaki looks at Kagura as if to say "no"]

Chiyo's Day [1.12]

 * Chiyo: [narrating] Whenever I go to school, sometimes Sakaki joins me on my walks because she lives in the neighborhood.
 * [Sakaki looks around and sees a kitty, then she chases after it without Chiyo noticing]
 * Chiyo-chan: [Looks to where Sakaki was. Thinking to herself.] But sometimes she just disappears all of a sudden and I don't know where she went. It's a mystery....

Exams [1.13]

 * Tomo: Hey, what are you guys acting so cool for?
 * Osaka and Kagura: Huh?
 * Tomo: Come on you two, say something back at her!
 * Osaka and Kagura: Huh? [Pointing to Tomo] Knucklehead.
 * Tomo: [Pronouncing with "s"] Knuckleheads.
 * Osaka and Kagura: Oh. [To Yomi] Who you calling knucklehead?!

 * Entire Class: It's not here.
 * [camera cuts to Tomo, sitting wide-eyed; she drops her pencil]

The Ocean, Summer Kimonos, And A Party [1.14]

 * [After Chiyo and Sakaki help everyone put their kimonos on.]
 * Yukari: An adult being dressed by a child...
 * Nyamo: You don't know how to put one on either!
 * Tomo: I thought for sure you'd be able to, Nyamo.
 * Yukari: [to the group] Isn't strange that Ms. Kurosawa here, who can tie a man's necktie, cannot put on her own kimono?
 * Tomo: You can tie a necktie?!
 * Yukari: The story begins long ago, when Ms. Nyamo was madly in love. This she-beast here used to practice doing neckties using me as her guinea pig!
 * Nyamo: So what?!
 * Yukari: Unfortunately, they broke up before she could show off her new skill. So her next ambition was-
 * [Nyamo starts fighting with her before she can finish her sentence]

 * Osaka: When you think about it rationally, you don't really need turtles.

 * [After Sakaki wins the Nekokoneko.]
 * Kagura: Wow, you totally killed that Nekokoneko! You hunter! You crazy sniper, you!
 * Sakaki: [in tears] It's not dead... It's not dead...

 * [The Morning After the Night Before, Nyamo style]
 * Chiyo: That was interesting, but I'm a little confused. what did you mean by.... [the soundtrack goes silent as Chiyo mimes out certain very odd sexual references]
 * Nyamo: What? Chiyo, who told you about that?
 * Yukari:You did
 * [The other girls walk in, Sakaki blushes awkwardly, and the other three bow in deep respect.]
 * Tomo: Thank you very much, sensei!
 * Osaka: That was very informative.
 * Kagura: [worshipfully] I'm so proud of you, Coach.
 * Nyamo: WHAT THE HELL DID I DO?

Sports Fest, Second Year [1.15]

 * [The girls wonder who would marry a man like Kimura.]
 * Tomo: I bet if she married Kimura she has a really bad personality.
 * Yukari: On the contrary! I hear that Kimura's wife is so sweet and gentle that she is willing to put up with that!
 * Tomo: [awestruck] Is she some kind of angel?
 * [Tomo, Yumi, Yukari and Chiyo look up as the background turns white and watches Kimura's Wife fly around as an angel.]

Culture Fest, Second Year [1.16]

 * Osaka: There will be lots of cute cats and dogs in the Cafe... and they're all dead. [The other girls groan.]

 * Kagura: I'm Kagura! The fact that I'm 156 centimeters tall has nothing to do with the Culture Fest!
 * Sakaki: I'm, Sakaki... [The on-screen picture indicates that Sakaki is 174 cm tall, an unusual height for a Japanese girl]
 * Kimura: IT'S REALLY, REALLY CUTE!

Osaka's Scary Stories [1.17]

 * Yukari: Listen up! I'm tired of just being an English teacher, so today I'm teaching you kids Math!
 * Yomi: Math, huh?
 * [Yukari leafs through the Math textbook, can't find a lesson she understands, and screams.]
 * Yukari: We're doing P.E.! Everybody outside.

 * Yukari: We're playing soccer!
 * Yomi: Sure, but do you even know the rules?
 * Yukari: I'm Nakata! [a player on Japan's national team -- the dub uses American women's international Mia Hamm.]
 * Yomi: What?
 * Yukari: My position is Nakata!

 * Yukari: [ecstatic at having scored] GOAL! GOAL! GOOOOAL!
 * Yomi: Sensei, that was our goal.
 * Yukari: Actually, I'm a spy for the other team.
 * Yomi: Whatever.

 * Kagura: Hey, does Chiyo-chan...
 * Tomo: Huh?
 * Kagura: ...Still believe in Santa Claus?
 * Tomo: Well, should I ask her?
 * [Tomo Walks over to Chiyo]]
 * Tomo: Chiyo-Chan, are you one of those people that still believes in Santa Claus?

 * Chiyo: I know that Santa is my father.
 * Sakaki: Santa... is her father?
 * [Sakaki's imagination overwhelms her and we get to see the results.]
 * Chiyo-chichi: Merry Krismasu!
 * Chiyo: Yay! My father is Santa!
 * Chiyo-chichi: Yes. The government pays me to deliver presents to all the children in Japan!
 * Chiyo: Amazing!
 * Chiyo-chichi: And I can fly at Mach 100!
 * Chiyo: Amazing, amazing!

 * Kagura: Now, if we accept that Santa doesn't exist -- do reindeer exist?
 * Tomo: [after a bout of explosive laughter] This girl believes in reindeer! [Continues laughing, the other girls gasp.]
 * Yomi: Reindeer do exist.

 * Osaka: I think that when Christmas time comes...
 * Chiyo: Yes?
 * Osaka: There's a red-nosed reindeer. That's mean. "Your shining nose is useful in the fog..." The way he said it doesn't help at all. If you tell a bald man his head is useful in the dark, you'd get punched in the face. Santa Claus says such cruel things.
 * Chiyo: [Has no idea what Osaka is talking about.] Uh, yeah...

Koyomi's Ordeals [1.18]

 * [Tomo tells Yukari about Yomi eating all you can eat snow crab]
 * Yukari: In Hokkaido?! Snow Crab??!! ALL YOU CAN EAT???!!!
 * Tomo: [crying] It was all Yomi. All Yomi.
 * Yomi: [To Tomo] You actually got her...
 * [Yukari slaps Yomi with a notebook]

 * [Tomo stands in front of a vending machine and buys a milk-tea]
 * Tomo: [looking into the vending machine, which pours the tea with no cup] Oh, no! The cup! My-my milk tea!
 * [seconds later]
 * Yomi: [holding a cup of milk-tea] What the... two cups...?
 * [Tomo looks on in shock, then bawls and runs around in circles]

Third Year [1.20]

 * Kagura: Chiyo-Chan's studying abroad! Amazing!
 * Tomo: Amazing!
 * Chiyo: No... really...
 * Tomo: Mm. She's gonna die.
 * Chiyo: Ahh!
 * Osaka: Mm. You know, 'cause your family's rich and you're so tiny. [she suddenly grabs Chiyo by the pigtails] And you're easy to catch!

School Trip [1.21]

 * Yukari: Our school trip is coming up next month. You look excited, Chiyo-chan.
 * [Chiyo giggles merrily]
 * Yukari: Actually, it's been canceled.

 * [Taking roll at the airport, Yukari style.]
 * Yukari: All right, is everybody here? If you're not here, raise your hand! Just kidding!
 * Tomo: I'm not here!
 * Yukari: But you are!

 * Tomo: [holding up a box of cookies]. Chinsuko.
 * [She holds the box in front of Yomi proudly.]
 * Tomo: It's chinsuko! it's chinsuko!
 * [Yomi blushes, annoyed. The way Tomo is saying it makes it sound like "penis" (Chinpoko)]

 * Osaka: [Pointing at a mounted Iriomote cat at a museum.] Yamapikarya! [Points to a real Iriomote cat] Yamapikarya!
 * '''Chiyo: I guess he'll look like that when he grows up too, huh.
 * Osaka: And then he'll look like that.....
 * [Sakaki and Chiyo's expressions change to open-mouthed horror as Osaka points at a skeleton.]
 * Osaka: Nice and bony.

Entrance Exams Study Camp! [1.22]

 * [while running a red light]
 * Tomo: Hey! What are you stopping for?
 * Yukari and Tomo: [Tomo stretches her face and sticks out her tongue as Yukari motions as if honking her horn] Loser! Loser!
 * Kaorin: [pointing ahead with a horrified expression] IT'S RED!!!
 * [Yukari, Tomo, and Kaorin scream offscreen]
 * Osaka: Ooh. They're flyin'.

 * Tomo: [jumps in front of Kaorin's camera] Cheese!
 * [long pause]
 * Kaorin: [jumping off the deck] Dammit! Whoa. [screams offscreen]
 * Osaka: Whoa. She's flyin'.

Yamamaya [1.24]

 * Osaka: The Frenchman Mr. Tadakichi and the Japanese Chiyo-chan coming to America. It'll be hard to tell who's the foreigner there.
 * Chiyo: Miss Osaka sure is interesting.

 * Tomo: Are you sure it's safe to leave that cat alone with Mr. Tadakichi? He might get eaten!
 * Chiyo: It's not a problem. Mr. Tadakachichi is much too big to --
 * Kagura: [reading a guidebook] Iriomote cats have been known to kill and eat wild boars.
 * Chiyo: [panicked by this sudden revelation] We've got to hurry!

Onwards, Entrance Exams! [1.25]

 * Osaka: What ya'll doin'?
 * Tomo: Just quizzing Chiyo-chan here. What kind of bird is always avoiding the police?
 * Osaka: A Rook. [in the japanese, it is a heron, which is a pun on the Japanese word for "fraud"]
 * [Tomo and Chiyo are both taken aback she got it so quickly]
 * Tomo: All right then -- who built Osaka Castle?
 * Osaka: The carpenter.
 * Tomo: If Nihongo is Japanese, what is Eigo?
 * Osaka: Still Japanese. [Eigo is the Japanese name of English]
 * Tomo: An eggplant, a watermelon and a radish are on a truck which takes a steep curve. What drops?
 * Osaka: The speed.
 * Tomo and Chiyo You're amazing!!
 * Osaka: Did I say something?

Graduation Ceremony [1.26]

 * [Kagura picks up a desk.]
 * Kagura: Would it be bad if I took one of the desks home?
 * Yukari: Yes, it would be bad.

Cast

 * Character - Japanese - English

 * Chiyo Mihama - Tomoko Kaneda - Jessica Boone
 * Tomo Takino - Chieko Higuchi - Brian Esler
 * Koyomi Mizuhara - Rie Tanaka - Nancy Novotny
 * Sakaki - Yu Asakawa - Hamish Strachan
 * Kagura - Houko Kuwashima - Allison Sumrall
 * Yukari Tanizaki - Akiko Hiramatsu - Luci Christian
 * Minamo Kurosawa - Aya Hisakawa - Monica Rial

title: Azumanga Daioh


title: User:Curious1i


text:
User:Lommer~enwikiquote

I live at wikipedia.

title: User:Lommer~enwikiquote


text:
Wikiquote:Votes for deletion archive/Template:Wikimedia, Portal:portal

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: delete Portal:portal, no consensus/keep Template:Wikimedia. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 08:30, 21 November 2005 (UTC)

Template:Wikimedia, Portal:portal
More portal stuff. Not discussed, only contributed to by anon, still at experimental stage. ~ MosheZadka (Talk) 19:37, 4 October 2005 (UTC)

 * Vote closed. Results: "Portal:portal" delete (3 Deletes; no dissent); "Template:Wikimedia" no consensus (de facto keep) (1 Delete; 1 Keep; 1 absention). Moshe's rationale, if I understand it correctly, suggests we should have voted the same way on both, but we didn't for whatever reason. Hopefully an orphan template will either be no great concern for the near future, or maybe prove to be useful. Otherwise, we can renominate it down the road for another review. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 08:30, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete ~ MosheZadka (Talk) 19:37, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Abstain for now for Template:Wikimedia.
 * Delete Portal:portal; we have no consensus if we have Portal (pseudo-)namespace. --Aphaia 04:04, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete "Portal:portal" unless anonymous user registers and convinces the community what use such pages would be. Keep "Template:Wikimedia" for now, as it may be a useful substitute for multiple interwiki boxes. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 00:58, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: Re: Template: Please note that the only page currently using the template is the above-mentioned Portal. I do not believe it is a coincidence. Notice that it links to pages with the same name on the 'pedia (which is sane), wiktionary (which we rarely do -- we usually only link to wiktionary in theme pages if it's obvious there'll be no 'pedia article), 'source (which we link to when it's a written source in the PD, which is quite rare anyway, but in any case certainly not in themes) and commons (which we almost never link to -- the only sane reasons would be audio/video files of someone saying quotes, and so would be mostly from people pages). Note also that 'source and 'pedia themselves often disagree on naming, and wikiquote sometimes disagrees with either of them (I think we try to strive for true to source at all costs much more than wikipedia, so we often use & where they use and -- I guess it's a cultural thing). So, to sum up, the only way the template could be useful, ever, is if we had an article which is named the same in 'pedia, 'source and commons, we would think that even though we have a 'pedia link, a wiktionary link would be useful, and that the commons link is useful for quotes. The likelihood for that is so low, that if it does crop up when we're 50K articles, we might as well just use four boxes (for something like that, surely the list of external links would be large enough so the four boxes + external links would actually take up less vert-space than using the template). However, for portals, this template makes perfect sense: the Law portal on wikiquote would link to the Law portal on 'pedia, the Law portal on wiktionary (useful for those pesky legal terms), the Law portal on commons (illustrating the quotes, perhaps?) and a link to the Law portal on 'source (so people would have an easy time browsing all the source files) and even a link to the Law portal on 'books (so people could learn more about the law to understand what quotations mean). So, if we decide that at this point in time we're not ready for portals (before discussion, using demos in Wikiquote namespace and so on), I am pretty sure this template will remain useless. Sorry for the long rant. ~ MosheZadka (Talk) 15:35, 9 November 2005 (UTC)

 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


text:
User talk:Michael Hopcroft

~ MosheZadka (Talk) 10:52, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

Re: Request for assistance
''Moshe. I don't know if you are the one who put up the "please edit" tage on the Azumanga Daioh WikiQuote article. However, I am not entirely sure what is required and could use some more specific guidance. Michael Hopcroft 21:06, 3 December 2005 (UTC)''

 * Hi. You gave no indication if you read the explanation and did not understand, or if you were not aware of it at all. In any case, I will expand the explanation there. Thanks ~ MosheZadka (Talk) 21:09, 3 December 2005 (UTC)

title: User talk:Michael Hopcroft


text:
Ronald Dworkin

Ronald Dworkin (11 December 1931 - 14 February 2013) was an American legal philosopher.

Quotes

 * Discretion, like the hole in a doughnut, does not exist except as an area left open by a surrounding belt of restriction. It is therefore a relative concept. It always makes sense to ask, "Discretion under which standards?" or "Discretion as to which authority?"
 * Taking Rights Seriously (1978), p. 31

 * 'Nixon is no longer president, and his crimes were so grave that no one is likely now to worry very much any more about the details of his own legal philosophy. Nevertheless in what follows I shall use the name 'Nixon' to refer, not to Nixon, but to any politician holding the set of attitudes about the Supreme Court that he made explicit in his political campaigns. There was, fortunately, only one real Nixon, but there are, in the special sense in which I use the name, many Nixons.'
 * Taking Rights Seriously (1978), p. 164

 * We live in and by the law. It makes us what we are: citizens and employees and doctors and spouses and people who own things. It is sword, shield, and menace: we insist on our wage, or refuse to pay our rent, or are forced to forfeit penalties, or are closed up in jail, all in the name of what our abstract and ethereal sovereign, the law, has decreed. And we argue about what it has decreed, even when the books that are supposed to record its commands and directions are silent; we act then as if law had muttered its doom, too low to be heard distinctly. We are subjects of law's empire, liegemen to its methods and ideals, bound in spirit while we debate what we must therefore do.
 * Law's Empire (1986), Preface

 * She ends her letter, characteristically, by picturing me and her other critics as indifferent to the suffering of women. But many feminists, including several who wrote or spoke to me about my review, regret her single-minded concentration on lurid sex. They think that though it has predictably attracted much publicity, it tends to stereotype women as victims, and takes attention from still urgent questions of economic, political, and professional equality.
 * "Pornography: An Exchange", response to Catharine MacKinnon, New York Review of Books 41(5), (3 March 1994)

 * Perhaps MacKinnon should reflect on these suggestions that the censorship issue is not so simple-minded, so transparently gender-against-gender, as she insists. She should stop calling names long enough to ask whether personal sensationalism, hyperbole, and bad arguments are really what the cause of sexual equality now needs.
 * "Pornography: An Exchange", response to Catharine MacKinnon, New York Review of Books 41(5), March 3, 1994.

 * If we are to be morally and ethically responsible, there can be no turning back once we find, as we have found, that some of the most basic presuppositions of these values are mistaken. Playing God is indeed playing with fire. But that is what we mortals have done since Prometheus, the patron saint of dangerous discoveries. We play with fire and take the consequences, because the alternative is cowardice in the face of the unknown.
 * Sovereign Virtue (2000), p. 446

 * We want to live decent, worthwhile lives, lives we can look back on with pride not shame. We want our communities to be fair and good and our laws to be wise and just. These are enormously difficult goals, in part because the issues at stake are complex and puzzling. When we are told that whatever convictions we do struggle to reach cannot in any case be true or false, or objective, or part of what we  know, or that they are just moves in a game of language, or just steam from the turbines of our emotions, or just experimental projects we should try for size, to see how we get on, or just invitations to thoughts that we might find diverting or amusing or less boring than  the ways we used to think, we must reply that these denigrating suggestions are all false, just bad philosophy. But these are pointless, unprofitable, wearying interruptions, and we must hope that the leaden spirits of our age, which nurture them, soon lift.
 * Objectivity and Truth: You'd Better Believe It. Published on Philosophy & Public Affairs, Vol. 25, No. 2 (Spring, 1996), pp. 87--139.

title: Ronald Dworkin


text:
User talk:Suzuki~enwikiquote

~ MosheZadka (Talk) 15:32, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Suzuki. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Suzuki~enwikiquote that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:37, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 05:59, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Suzuki~enwikiquote


text:
User talk:212.123.174.247

Deliberate vandalism can result in IP addresses being blocked from editing. ~ Kalki 15:34, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

title: User talk:212.123.174.247