text:
Alfred North Whitehead

Alfred North Whitehead, OM (15 February 1861 – 30 December 1947) was an English mathematician and philosopher. He is best known as the defining figure of the philosophical school known as process philosophy, which today has found application to a wide variety of disciplines, including ecology, theology, education, physics, biology, economics, and psychology, among other areas.

 * See also Principia Mathematica

1910s

 * The aim of science is to seek the simplest explanations of complex facts. We are apt to fall into the error of thinking that the facts are simple because simplicity is the goal of our quest. The guiding motto in the life of every natural philosopher should be, "Seek simplicity and distrust it."
 * The Concept of Nature (1919), Chapter VII, p.143.

An Introduction to Mathematics (1911)

 * The study of mathematics is apt to commence in disappointment... We are told that by its aid the stars are weighed and the billions of molecules in a drop of water are counted. Yet, like the ghost of Hamlet's father, this great science eludes the efforts of our mental weapons to grasp it.
 * ch. 1.

 * By relieving the brain of all unnecessary work, a good notation sets it free to concentrate on more advanced problems, and in effect increases the mental power of the race.
 * ch. 5.

 * It is a profoundly erroneous truism, repeated by all copy-books and by eminent people when they are making speeches, that we should cultivate the habit of thinking of what we are doing. The precise opposite is the case. Civilization advances by extending the number of important operations which we can perform without thinking about them. Operations of thought are like cavalry charges in a battle — they are strictly limited in number, they require fresh horses, and must only be made at decisive moments.
 * ch. 5.

 * It is a safe rule to apply that, when a mathematical or philosophical author writes with a misty profundity, he is talking nonsense.
 * ch. 15.

The Principles of Natural Knowledge (1919)

 * Life is complex in its expression, involving more than percipience, namely desire, emotion, will, and feeling.

 * Identification of rhythm as the causal counterpart of life; wherever there is some life, only perceptible to us when the analogies are sufficiently close.

 * The rhythm is then the life, in the sense in which it can be said to be included within nature.

1920s

 * In its solitariness the spirit asks, What, in the way of value, is the attainment of life? And it can find no such value till it has merged its individual claim with that of the objective universe. Religion is world-loyalty.
 * Religion in the Making (February 1926), Lecture II: "Religion and Dogma".

 * There is a quality of life which lies always beyond the mere fact of life; and when we include the quality in the fact, there is still omitted the quality of the quality.
 * Religion in the Making (February 1926), Lecture II: "Religion and Dogma".

 * Rightness of limitation is essential for growth of reality. Unlimited possibility and abstract creativity can procure nothing. The limitation, and the basis arising from what is already actual, are both of them necessary and interconnected.
 * Religion in the Making (February 1926), Lecture IV: "Truth and Criticism".

 * We think in generalities, but we live in detail. To make the past live, we must perceive it in detail in addition to thinking of it in generalities.
 * "The Education of an Englishman" in The Atlantic Monthly, Vol. 138 (1926), p. 192.

 * We do not require elaborate training merely in order to refrain from embarking upon intricate trains of inference. Such abstinence is only too easy.
 * Symbolism: Its Meaning and Effect (1927).

 * It is the first step in sociological wisdom, to recognize that the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur:—like unto an arrow in the hand of a child. The art of free society consists first in the maintenance of the symbolic code; and secondly in fearlessness of revision, to secure that the code serves those purposes which satisfy an enlightened reason. Those societies which cannot combine reverence to their symbols with freedom of revision, must ultimately decay either from anarchy, or from the slow atrophy of a life stifled by useless shadows.
 * Symbolism: Its Meaning and Effect (1927), chapter 3, p. 88; final paragraph of the book.

 * Scientists, animated by the purpose of proving they are purposeless, constitute an interesting subject for study.
 * The Function of Reason (1929), Beacon Books, 1958, p. 16

Science and the Modern World (1925)

 * Science and the Modern World: Lowell Lectures, 1925 (New York: The Macmillan Company, 1925)

 * Men can be provincial in time, as well as in place.
 * Preface, p. ix

 * Philosophy, in one of its functions, is the critic of cosmologies. It is its function to harmonise, refashion, and justify divergent intuitions as to the nature of things. It has to insist on the scrutiny of the ultimate ideas, and on the retention of the whole of the evidence in shaping our cosmological scheme. Its business is to render explicit, and — so far as may be — efficient, a process which otherwise is unconsciously performed without rational tests.
 * Preface, pp. ix–x

 * The Reformation was a popular uprising, and for a century and a half drenched Europe in blood. The beginnings of the Scientific movement were confined to a minority among the intellectual elite.… [T]he worst that happened to men of science was that Galileo suffered an honorable detention and a mild reproof, before dying peacefully in his bed. The way in which the persecution of Galileo has been remembered is a tribute to the quiet commencement of the most intimate change in outlook which the human race had yet encountered. Since a babe was born in a manger, it may be doubted whether so great a thing has happened with so little stir.
 * Ch. 1: "The Origins of Modern Science", pp. 2–3

 * The new tinge to modern minds is a vehement and passionate interest in the relation of general principles to irreducible and stubborn facts. All the world over and at all times there have been practical men, absorbed in 'irreducible and stubborn facts'; all the world over and at all times there have been men of philosophic temperament, who have been absorbed in the weaving of general principles. It is this union of passionate interest in the detailed facts with equal devotion to abstract generalisation which forms the novelty of our present society.
 * Ch. 1: "The Origins of Modern Science", pp. 3–4

 * More and more it is becoming evident that what the West can most readily give to the East is its science and its scientific outlook. This is transferable from country to country, and from race to race, wherever there is a rational society.
 * Ch. 1: "The Origins of Modern Science", p. 4

 * Familiar things happen, and mankind does not bother about them. It requires a very unusual mind to undertake the analysis of the obvious.
 * Ch. 1: "The Origins of Modern Science", p. 6

 * If science is not to degenerate into a medley of ad hoc hypotheses, it must become philosophical and must enter upon a thorough criticism of its own foundations.
 * Ch. 1: "The Origins of Modern Science", p. 24

 * The science of pure mathematics, in its modern developments, may claim to be the most original creation of the human spirit.
 * Ch. 2: "Mathematics as an Element in the History of Thought", p. 28

 * [T]he pursuit of mathematics is a divine madness of the human spirit.
 * Ch. 2: "Mathematics as an Element in the History of Thought", p. 30

 * Nothing is more impressive than the fact that as mathematics withdrew increasingly into the upper regions of ever greater extremes of abstract thought, it returned back to earth with a corresponding growth of importance for the analysis of concrete fact. ...The paradox is now fully established that the utmost abstractions are the true weapons with which to control our thought of concrete fact.
 * Ch. 2: "Mathematics as an Element in the History of Thought", p. 46

 * If you have had your attention directed to the novelties in thought in your own lifetime, you will have observed that almost all really new ideas have a certain aspect of foolishness when they are first produced.
 * Ch. 3: "The Century of Genius", pp. 67–68

 * When you are criticising the philosophy of an epoch, do not chiefly direct your attention to those intellectual positions which its exponents feel it necessary explicitly to defend. There will be some fundamental assumptions which adherents of all the variant systems within the epoch unconsciously presuppose. Such assumptions appear so obvious that people do not know what they are assuming because no other way of putting things has ever occurred to them. With these assumptions a certain limited number of types of philosophic systems are possible, and this group of systems constitutes the philosophy of the epoch.
 * Ch. 3: "The Century of Genius", p. 69

 * [T]he order of nature cannot be justified by the mere observation of nature. For there is nothing in the present fact which inherently refers either to the past or to the future.… [I]t illustrates the anti-rationalism of the scientific public that, when Hume did appear, it was only the religious implications of his philosophy which attracted attention. This was because the clergy were in principle rationalists, whereas the men of science were content with a simple faith in the order of nature.
 * Ch. 3: "The Century of Genius", p. 73

 * [N]ature gets credit which should in truth be reserved for ourselves: the rose for its scent: the nightingale for his song: and the sun for his radiance. The poets are entirely mistaken. They should address their lyrics to themselves, and should turn them into odes of self-congratulation on the excellency of the human mind.
 * Ch. 3: "The Century of Genius", p. 77

 * You cannot think without abstractions; accordingly, it is of the utmost importance to be vigilant in critically revising your modes of abstraction. It is here that philosophy finds its niche as essential to the healthy progress of society. It is the critic of abstractions. A civilisation which cannot burst through its current abstractions is doomed to sterility.
 * Ch. 4: "The Eighteenth Century", pp. 82–83

 * No epoch is homogeneous; whatever you may have assigned as the dominant note of a considerable period, it will always be possible to produce men, and great men, belonging to the same time, who exhibit themselves as antagonistic to the tone of their age.
 * Ch. 4: "The Eighteenth Century", p. 93

 * [N]ature is a structure of evolving processes. The reality is the process.
 * Ch. 4: "The Eighteenth Century", p. 102

 * It is in literature that the concrete outlook of humanity receives its expression.
 * Ch. 5: "The Romantic Reaction", p. 106

 * The relevant poems are Milton's Paradise Lost, Pope's Essay on Man, Wordsworth's Excursion, Tennyson's In Memoriam.
 * Ch. 5: "The Romantic Reaction", p. 108

 * In a certain sense, everything is everywhere at all times. For every location involves an aspect of itself in every other location. Thus every spatio-temporal standpoint mirrors the world.
 * Ch. 5: "The Romantic Reaction", p. 128

 * In a sense, all explanation must end in an ultimate arbitrariness.
 * Ch. 5: "The Romantic Reaction", p. 130

 * The salvation of reality is its obstinate, irreducible, matter-of-fact entities, which are limited to be no other than themselves. Neither science, nor art, nor creative action can tear itself away from obstinate, irreducible, limited facts.
 * Ch. 5: "The Romantic Reaction", p. 132

 * The greatest invention of the nineteenth century was the invention of the method of invention.
 * Ch. 6: "The Nineteenth Century", p. 136

 * In the past human life was lived in a bullock cart; in the future it will be lived in an aeroplane; and the change of speed amounts to a difference in quality.
 * Ch. 6: "The Nineteenth Century", p. 137

 * Any physical object which by its influence deteriorates its environment, commits suicide.
 * Ch. 6: "The Nineteenth Century", p. 155

 * Heaven knows what seeming nonsense may not to-morrow be demonstrated truth.
 * Ch. 7: "Relativity", p. 161

 * All science must start with some assumptions as to the ultimate analysis of the facts with which it deals. These assumptions are justified partly by their adherence to the types of occurrence of which we are directly conscious, and partly by their success in representing the observed facts with a certain generality, devoid of ad hoc suppositions.
 * Ch. 8: "The Quantum Theory", p. 189

 * Epochs do not rise from the dead.… [W]hereas you can make a replica of an ancient statue, there is no possible replica of an ancient state of mind. There can be no nearer approximation than that which a masquerade bears to real life. There may be understanding of the past, but there is a difference between the modern and the ancient reactions to the same stimuli.
 * Ch. 9: "Science and Philosophy", p. 194

 * Every human being is the natural guardian of his own importance.
 * Ch. 9: "Science and Philosophy", p. 195

 * The ancient world takes its stand upon the drama of the Universe, the modern world upon the inward drama of the Soul.
 * Ch. 9: "Science and Philosophy", p. 196

 * Often things realised in thought are more vivid than than the same things in inattentive physical experience. But the things apprehended as mental are always subject to the condition that we come to a stop when we come to explore ever higher grades of complexity in their realised relationships. We always find tat we have thought of just this — whatever it may be — and of no more.
 * Ch. 10: "Abstraction", p. 239

 * No reason can be given for the nature of God, because that nature is the ground of all rationality.
 * Ch. 11: "God", p. 250

 * He has been named respectively, Jehovah, Allah, Brahma, Father in Heaven, Order of Heaven, First Cause, Supreme Being, Chance. Each name corresponds to a system of thought derived from the experiences of those who have used it. Among medieval and modern philosophers, anxious to establish the religious significance of God, an unfortunate habit has prevailed of paying Him metaphysical compliments. He has been conceived as the foundation of the metaphysical situation with its ultimate activity. If this conception be adhered to, there can be no alternative except to discern in Him the origin of all evil as well as of all good. He is then the supreme author of the play, and to Him must therefore be ascribed its shortcomings as well as its success.
 * Ch. 11: "God", pp. 250–251

 * It belongs to the self-respect of intellect to pursue every tangle of thought to its final unravelment.
 * Ch. 12: "Religion and Science", p. 258

 * A clash of doctrines is not a disaster — it is an opportunity.
 * Ch. 12: "Religion and Science", p. 259

 * In formal logic, a contradiction is the signal of a defeat; but in the evolution of real knowledge it marks the first step in progress towards a victory.
 * Ch. 12: "Religion and Science", p. 260

 * [W]e cannot think first and act afterwards. From the moment of birth we are immersed in action, and can only fitfully guide it by taking thought.
 * Ch. 12: "Religion and Science", p. 261

 * In the first place for over two centuries religion has been on the defensive, and on a weak defensive.[…] The result of the repetition of this undignified retreat, during many generations, has at last almost entirely destroyed the intellectual authority of religious thinkers. Consider this contrast: when Darwin or Einstein proclaim theories which modify our ideas, it is a triumph for science. We do not go about saying that there is another defeat for science, because its old ideas have been abandoned. We know that another step of scientific insight has been gained. Religion will not regain its old power until it can face change in the same spirit as does science. Its principles may be eternal, but the expression of those principles requires continual development.
 * Ch. 12: "Religion and Science", p. 263

 * I now come to the second reason for the modern fading of interest in religion.[…] Religion is the reaction of human nature to its search for God. The presentation of God under the aspect of power awakens every modern instinct of critical reaction. This is fatal; for religion collapses unless its main positions command immediacy of assent. In this respect the old phraseology is at variance with the psychology of modern civilisations. This change in psychology is largely due to science, and is one of the chief ways in which the advance of science has weakened the hold of the old religious forms of expression.
 * Ch. 12: "Religion and Science", pp. 266–267

 * Religion is the vision of something which stands beyond, behind and within the passing flux of immediate things; something which is real, and yet waiting to be realized; something which is a remote possibility, and yet the greatest of present facts; something that gives meaning to all that passes, and yet eludes apprehension; something whose possession is the final good, and yet is beyond all reach; something which is the ultimate ideal, and the hopeless quest.
 * Ch. 12: "Religion and Science", pp. 267–268

 * The fact of the religious vision, and its history of persistent expansion, is our one ground for optimism. Apart from it, human life is a flash of occasional enjoyments lighting up a mass of pain and misery, a bagatelle of transient experience.
 * Ch. 12: "Religion and Science", p. 268

 * The power of God is the worship He inspires.[…] The worship of God is not a rule of safety — it is an adventure of the spirit, a flight after the unattainable. The death of religion comes with the repression of the high hope of adventure.
 * Ch. 12: "Religion and Science", pp. 268–269

 * There is something between the gross specialised values of the mere practical man, and the thin specialised values of the mere scholar. Both types have missed something; and if you add together the two sets of values, you do not obtain the missing elements.
 * Ch. 13: "Requisites for Social Progress", p. 279

 * Sensitiveness without impulse spells decadence, and impulse without sensitiveness spells brutality.
 * Ch. 13: "Requisites for Social Progress", p. 280

 * [F]ertilisation of the soul is the reason for the necessity of art.
 * Ch. 13: "Requisites for Social Progress", p. 283

 * Modern science has imposed on humanity the necessity for wandering. Its progressive thought and its progressive technology make the transition through time, from generation to generation, a true migration into uncharted seas of adventure.
 * Ch. 13: "Requisites for Social Progress", p. 291

 * It is the business of the future to be dangerous; and it is among the merits of science that it equips the future for its duties.
 * Ch. 13: "Requisites for Social Progress", p. 291

The Aims of Education (1929)

 * Education is the acquisition of the art of the utilisation of knowledge.

 * For successful education there must always be a certain freshness in the knowledge dealt with. It must be either new in itself or invested with some novelty of application to the new world of new times. Knowledge does not keep any better than fish. You may be dealing with knowledge of the old species, with some old truth; but somehow it must come to the students, as it were, just drawn out of the sea and with the freshness of its immediate importance.

 * The consequences of a plethora of half-digested theoretical knowledge are deplorable.

 * The essence of education is that it be religious. Pray, what is religious education? A religious education is an education which inculcates duty and reverence. Duty arises from our potential control over the course of events. Where attainable knowledge could have changed the issue, ignorance has the guilt of vice. And the foundation of reverence is this perception, that the present holds within itself the complete sum of existence, backwards and forwards, that whole amplitude of time, which is eternity.

 * That knowledge which adds greatness to character is knowledge so handled as to transform every phase of immediate experience.

 * The universities are schools of education, and schools of research. But the primary reason for their existence is not to be found either in the mere knowledge conveyed to the students or in the mere opportunities for research afforded to the members of the faculty. Both these functions could be performed at a cheaper rate, apart from these very expensive institutions. Books are cheap, and the system of apprenticeship is well understood. So far as the mere imparting of information is concerned, no university has had any justification for existence since the popularization of printing in the fifteenth century. Yet the chief impetus to the foundation of universities came after that date, and in more recent times has even increased. The justification for a university is that it preserves the connection between knowledge and the zest of life, by uniting the young and the old in the imaginative consideration of learning.

 * In training a child to activity of thought, above all things we must beware of what I will call "inert ideas"—that is to say, ideas that are merely received into the mind without being utilised, or tested, or thrown into fresh combinations. In the history of education, the most striking phenomenon is that schools of learning, which at one epoch are alive with a ferment of genius, in a succeeding generation exhibit merely pedantry and routine. The reason is, that they are overladen with inert ideas. Education with inert ideas is not only useless: it is, above all things, harmful—Corruptio optimi, pessima [the corruption of the best is the worst].

 * Every intellectual revolution which has ever stirred humanity into greatness has been a passionate protest against inert ideas. Then, alas, with pathetic ignorance of human psychology, it has proceeded by some educational scheme to bind humanity afresh with inert ideas of its own fashioning.

 * What the learned world tends to offer is one second-hand scrap of information illustrating ideas derived from another second-hand scrap of information. The second-handedness of the learned world is the secret of its mediocrity.

 * The main importance of Francis Bacon’s influence does not lie in any peculiar theory of inductive reasoning which he happened to express, but in the revolt against second-hand information of which he was a leader.

: An Essay in Cosmology (1929)

 * There remains the final reflection, how shallow, puny, and imperfect are efforts to sound the depths in the nature of things. In philosophical discussion, the merest hint of dogmatic certainty as to finality of statement is an exhibition of folly.
 * Preface, p. 16 (Corrected Edition)

 * The chief error in philosophy is overstatement.
 * Pt. I, ch. 1, sec. 1.

 * In all philosophic theory there is an ultimate which is actual in virtue of its accidents. It is only then capable of characterization through its accidental embodiments, and apart from these accidents is devoid of actuality. In the philosophy of organism this ultimate is termed creativity; and God] is its primordial, non-temporal accident. In [[monistic philosophies, Spinoza's or absolute idealism, this ultimate is God, who is also equivalently termed The Absolute. In such monistic schemes, the ultimate is illegitimately allowed a final, eminent reality, beyond that ascribed to any of its accidents. In this general position the philosophy of organism seems to approximate more to some strains of Indian, or Chinese, thought, than to western Asiatic, or European, thought. One side makes process ultimate; the other side makes fact ultimate.
 * Pt. I, ch. 1, sec. 2.

 * Rationalism is an adventure in the clarification of thought.
 * Pt. I, ch. 1, sec. 3.

 * Our habitual experience is a complex of failure and success in the enterprise of interpretation. If we desire a record of uninterpreted experience, we must ask a stone to record its autobiography.
 * Pt. I, ch. 1, sec. 6.

 * Philosophy is the self-correction by consciousness of its own initial excess of subjectivity. Each actual occasion contributes to the circumstances of its origin additional formative elements deepening its own peculiar individuality. Consciousness is only the last and greatest of such elements by which the selective character of the individual obscures the external totality from which it originates and which it embodies. An actual individual, of such higher grade, has truck with the totality of things by reason of its sheer actuality; but it has attained its individual depth of being by a selective emphasis limited to its own purposes. The task of philosophy is to recover the totality obscured by the selection.
 * Pt. I, ch. 1, sec. 6.

 * Philosophy finds religion, and modifies it; and conversely religion is among the data of experience which philosophy must weave into its own scheme. Religion is an ultimate craving to infuse into the insistent particularity of emotion that non-temporal generality which primarily belongs to conceptual thought alone. In the higher organisms the differences of tempo between the mere emotions and the conceptual experiences produce a life-tedium, unless this supreme fusion has been effected. The two sides of the organism require a reconciliation in which emotional experiences illustrate a conceptual justification, and conceptual experiences find an emotional illustration.
 * Pt. I, ch. 1, sec. 6.

 * The term many presupposes the term one, and the term one presupposes the term many.
 * Pt. I, ch. 2, sec. 2.

 * Creativity is the universal of universals characterizing ultimate matter of fact. It is that ultimate principle by which the many, which are the universe disjunctively, become the one actual occasion, which is the universe conjunctively. It lies in the nature of things that the many enter into complex unity.
 * Pt. I, ch. 2, sec. 2.

 * The ultimate metaphysical principle is the advance from disjunction to conjunction, creating a novel entity other than the entities given in disjunction.
 * Pt. I, ch. 2, sec. 2.

 * The safest general characterization of the European philosophical tradition is that it consists of a series of footnotes to Plato.
 * Pt. II, ch. 1, sec. 1.

 * Without doubt, if we are to go back to that ultimate, integral experience, unwarped by the sophistications of theory, that experience whose elucidation is the final aim of philosophy, the flux of things is one ultimate generalization around which we must weave our philosophical system.
 * Pt. II, ch. 10, sec. 1.

 * The oneness of the universe, and the oneness of each element of the universe, repeat themselves to the crack of doom in the creative advance from creature to creature, each creature including in itself the whole of history and exemplifying the self-identity of things and their mutual diversities.
 * Pt. III, ch. 1, sec. 7.

 * The chief danger to philosophy is narrowness in the selection of evidence.
 * Pt. V, ch. 1, sec. 1.

 * There is a greatness in the lives of those who build up religious systems, a greatness in action, in idea and in self-subordination, embodied in instance after instance through centuries of growth. There is a greatness in the rebels who destroy such systems: they are the Titans who storm heaven, armed with passionate sincerity. It may be that the revolt is the mere assertion by youth of its right to its proper brilliance, to that final good of immediate joy. Philosophy may not neglect the multifariousness of the world — the fairies dance, and Christ is nailed to the cross.
 * Pt. V, ch. 1, sec. 1.

 * The theme of Cosmology, which is the basis of all religions, is the story of the dynamic effort of the World passing into everlasting unity, and of the static majesty of God's vision, accomplishing its purpose of completion by absorption of the World's multiplicity of effort.
 * Pt. V, ch. II, sec. V.

 * Some philosophers fail to distinguish propositions from judgments; … But in the real world it is more important that a proposition be interesting than that it be true. The importance of truth is that it adds to interest.
 * p. 259.
 * Variant: It is more important that a proposition be interesting than that it be true. This statement is almost a tautology. For the energy of operation of a proposition in an occasion of experience is its interest, and its importance. But of course a true proposition is more apt to be interesting than a false one.
 * As extended upon in Adventures of Ideas (1933), Pt. 4, Ch. 16.

 * There is nothing in the real world which is merely an inert fact. Every reality is there for feeling: it promotes feeling; and it is felt.
 * Chapter IV, p. 310.

 * A precise language awaits a completed metaphysics.

 * In the inescapable flux, there is something that abides; in the overwhelming permanence, there is an element that escapes into flux. Permanence can be snatched only out of flux; and the passing moment can find its adequate intensity only by its submission to permanence.

 * Thus the universe is to be conceived as attaining the active self-expression of its own variety of opposites of its own freedom and its own necessity, of its own multiplicity and its own unity, of its own imperfection and its own perfection. All the opposites are elements in the nature of things, and are incorrigibly there. The concept of God is the way in which we understand this incredible fact that what cannot be, yet is.

 * Error is the price we pay for progress.

 * The art of progress is to preserve order amid change, and to preserve change amid order.

 * Whether or no it be for the general good, life is robbery. It is at this point that with life morals become acute. The robber requires justification.

 * For the kingdom of heaven is with us today.

 * We find here the final application of the doctrine of objective immortality. Throughout the perishing occasions in the life of each temporal Creature, the inward source of distaste or of refreshment, the judge arising out of the very nature of things, redeemer or goddess of mischief, is the transformation of Itself, everlasting in the Being of God. In this way, the insistent craving is justified — the insistent craving that zest for existence be refreshed by the ever-present, unfading importance of our immediate actions, which perish and yet live for evermore.

1930s

 * No member of a crew is praised for the rugged individuality of his rowing.
 * "Harvard: The Future," The Atlantic Monthly, September 1936

 * The mentality of mankind and the language of mankind created each other. If we like to assume the rise of language as a given fact, then it is not going too far to say that the souls of men are the gift from language to mankind. The account of the sixth day should be written: He gave them speech, and they became souls.
 * Modes of Thought (1938).

Adventures of Ideas (1933)

 * Intolerance is the besetting sin of moral fervour.
 * p. 63, Ch. 4

 * In the study of ideas, it is necessary to remember that insistence on hard-headed clarity issues from sentimental feeling, as if it were a mist, cloaking the perplexities of fact. Insistence on clarity at all costs is based on sheer superstition as to the mode in which human intelligence functions. Our reasoning grasps at straws for premises and float on gossamer for deductions.
 * p. 91.

 * Life is an offensive, directed against the repetitious mechanism of the Universe.
 * p. 102.

 * Systems, scientific and philosophic, come and go. Each method of limited understanding is at length exhausted. In its prime each system is a triumphant success: in its decay it is an obstructive nuisance.
 * p. 203.

 * The deliberate aim at Peace very easily passes into its bastard substitute, Anesthesia.
 * p. 284.

 * The deepest definition of youth is life as yet untouched by tragedy.
 * p. 285.

 * The human body is an instrument for the production of art in the life of the human soul.
 * p. 349.

 * A general definition of civilization: a civilized society is exhibiting the five qualities of truth, beauty, adventure, art, peace.
 * p. 353.

 * A race preserves its vigour so long as it harbours a real contrast between what has been and what may be, and so long as it is nerved by the vigour to adventure beyond the safeties of the past. Without adventure, civilization is in full decay.
 * p. 360.

Attributed from posthumous publications

 * I have always noticed that deeply and truly religious persons are fond of a joke, and I am suspicious of those who aren’t.
 * As quoted in Church and Home, Vol. 1 (1964) by United Methodist Church, and Evangelical United Brethren Church, p. 21.

 * Buddhism is the most colossal example in the history of applied metaphysics.
 * in Verhoeven, Martin J. 2001. “Buddhism and Science: Probing the Boundaries Of Faith and Reason.” Religion East and West (1): 77-97. quoted from Malhotra, R. & Viswanathan V. (2022). Snakes in the Ganga : Breaking India 2.0.

Dialogues of Alfred North Whitehead (1954)

 * Lucien Price (1954). Dialogues of Alfred North Whitehead

 * There are no whole truths; all truths are half-truths. It is trying to treat them as whole truths that plays the devil.
 * Prologue.

 * A man really writes for an audience of about ten persons. Of course if others like it, that is clear gain. But if those ten are satisfied, he is content.
 * p. 66

 * The vitality of thought is in adventure. Ideas won't keep. Something must be done about them. When the idea is new, its custodians have fervor, live for it, and, if need be, die for it.
 * p. 100; Ch. 12, April 28, 1938.

 * Intelligence is quickness to apprehend as distinct from ability, which is capacity to act wisely on the thing apprehended.
 * p. 135; Ch. 17, December 15, 1939.

 * Our minds are finite, and yet even in these circumstances of finitude we are surrounded by possibilities that are infinite, and the purpose of human life is to grasp as much as we can out of the infinitude.
 * Ch. 21, June 28, 1941.

 * A culture is in its finest flower before it begins to analyze itself.
 * Ch. 22, August 17, 1941.

 * What is morality in any given time or place? It is what the majority then and there happen to like, and immorality is what they dislike.
 * Ch. 22, August 30, 1941.

 * The ideas of Freud were popularized by people who only imperfectly understood them, who were incapable of the great effort required to grasp them in their relationship to larger truths, and who therefore assigned to them a prominence out of all proportion to their true importance.
 * Ch. 28, June 3, 1943.

 * Art is the imposing of a pattern on experience, and our aesthetic enjoyment in recognition of the pattern.
 * Ch. 29, June 10, 1943.

 * A philosopher of imposing stature doesn't think in a vacuum. Even his most abstract ideas are, to some extent, conditioned by what is or is not known in the time when he lives.
 * Ch. 29, June 10, 1943.

 * With the sense of sight, the idea communicates the emotion, whereas, with sound, the emotion communicates the idea, which is more direct and therefore more powerful.
 * Ch. 29, June 10, 1943.

 * Ninety percent of our lives is governed by emotion. Our brains merely register and act upon what is telegraphed to them by our bodily experience. Intellect is to emotion as our clothes are to our bodies; we could not very well have civilized life without clothes, but we would be in a poor way if we had only clothes without bodies.
 * Ch. 29, June 10, 1943.

 * No period of history has ever been great or ever can be that does not act on some sort of high, idealistic motives, and idealism in our time has been shoved aside, and we are paying the penalty for it.
 * Ch. 32, January 13, 1944.

 * The English never abolish anything. They put it in cold storage.
 * Ch. 36, January 19, 1945.

 * Shakespeare wrote better poetry for not knowing too much; Milton, I think, knew too much finally for the good of his poetry.
 * Ch. 43, November 11, 1947.

Quotes about Whitehead

 * Professor Whitehead has recently restored a seventeenth century phrase—"climate of opinion." The phrase is much needed. Whether arguments command assent or not depends less upon the logic that conveys them than upon the climate of opinion in which they are sustained.
 * Carl L. Becker, The Heavenly City of the Eighteenth-century Philosophers (1932).

 * Our time has seen the best-educated society, situated in the heart of the most civilized part of the world, give birth to the most murderously vengeful government in history. Forty years ago the philosopher Alfred North Whitehead thought it self-evident that you would get a good government if you took power out of the hands of the acquisitive and gave it to the learned and the cultivated. At present, a child in kindergarten knows better than that.
 * Eric Hoffer, in Before the Sabbath (1979), p. 40-41.

 * In "Religion in the Making," by A. N. Whitehead... the approach is philosophical, and there are many interesting and valuable observations. But Dr. Whitehead occasionally indulges himself, like all metaphysicians, in what has a suspicious resemblance to nonsense.
 * H. L. Mencken, Treatise on the Gods, "Biographical Note" 1930.

 * Mr. Alfred North Whitehead has pointed out that one of our chief literary sins is in thinking of past and future in terms of a thousand years forward and backward, when really to experience the organic nature of past and future one should think of time in the order of a second, or a fraction of a second. One can make a similar remark about our esthetic perceptions... one of the signs of a rational enjoyment of the machine and the machine-made environment is to be concerned with much smaller differences and to react sensitively to them.
 * Lewis Mumford, Technics and Civilization (1934) Ch. 7 "Assimilation of the Machine"

 * As a teacher I regard Whitehead as perfect.
 * Bertrand Russell, as quoted in Insights and Oversights of the Great Thinkers (1983) by Charles Hartshorne, Ch. 22, p. 255.

 * In a book called Symbolism, Its Meaning and Effect, Whitehead points out that perception is usually a matter of symbols, just like language; I say I see a book when I actually see a red oblong. The Transactionists (who have been influenced by Whitehead rather than Husserl) take this one stage further, and point out that when I 'perceive' something, I am actually making a bet with myself that what I perceive is what I think it is. In order to act and live at all, I have to make these bets; I cannot afford to make absolutely certain that things are what I think they are. But this means that we should not take our perceptions at face value, any more than Nietzsche was willing to take philosophy at its face value; we must allow for prejudice and distortion.
 * Colin Wilson in Introduction to the New Existentialism, p. 66.

 * Whitehead’s mode of thought is, to a remarkable extent, reminiscent of ancient Buddhism….
 * Charles Hartshorne, quoted from Malhotra, R. & Viswanathan V. (2022). Snakes in the Ganga : Breaking India 2.0.

 * [Whitehead’s claims] cannot be observed, directly and separately, by a mind untrained in introspective meditation... Just as the minute living beings in the microcosm of a drop of water become visible only through a microscope, so, too, the exceedingly short-lived processes in the world of mind become cognizable only with the help of a very subtle mental scrutiny, and that only obtains as a result of meditative training. None but the kind of introspective mindfulness or attention (satti ) that has acquired, in meditative absorption, a high degree of inner equipoise, purity and firmness (upekkha-sati-parisuddhi ), will possess the keenness, subtlety and quickness of cognitive response required for such delicate mental microscopy. Without that … only the way of inference from comparisons between various fragmentary series of thought moments will be open as a means of research.
 * Nyanaponika Thera quoted from Malhotra, R. & Viswanathan V. (2022). Snakes in the Ganga : Breaking India 2.0.

 * What is surprising is Whitehead’s determination to attribute the origins of his thought solely to Western sources. While the Western precedents he cites are at best weak analogues, the Buddhist tenets from which his system derives are clearcut and extremely detailed. His arguments are strongest and most lucid when they are framed using Buddhist models; they become vague and confusing when he turns speculative and tries to appear original in both terminology and framework. Anyone knowledgeable in Buddhism would find his attempts very unconvincing in their attribution to Western philosophers as his theoretical predecessors.
 * Malhotra, R. & Viswanathan V. (2022). Snakes in the Ganga : Breaking India 2.0.

 * Whitehead made his theory Christianity-friendly by superimposing God upon the process. From the Buddhist point of view, this is both gratuitous and inconsistent. His appropriation of Buddhism as a philosophy of science and then as a theology compatible with Christianity became very popular among Christian theologians. Several of them, including Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, Charles Hartshorne, John B. Cobb, Karl Rahner, started advancing a curious blend known as Process Theology. This is now considered a mainstream Christian theology and pointing out its Indian origins is fiercely opposed, almost to the point of censorship.
 * Malhotra, R. & Viswanathan V. (2022). Snakes in the Ganga : Breaking India 2.0.

Disputed

 * The ultimate goal of mathematics is to eliminate any need for intelligent thought.
 * Attributed to Whitehead in A = B (1996), by Marko Petkovšek, Herbert S. Wilf, and Doron Zeilberger, p. 3, but this most likely had its origins in a margin note submitted by an anonymous student, quoted in the book Concrete Mathematics : A Foundation for Computer Science (1992) by Ronald L. Graham, Donald E. Knuth, and Oren Patashnik, p. 56. That book, with which Wilf was quite familiar, on page 503 quotes Whitehead making a very similar statement. Indeed, that quotation (from chapter 5 of Whitehead's An Introduction to Mathematics) is already correctly attributed above.

 * The purpose of thinking is so our thoughts die instead of us.
 * Not found in any of his writings. Possibly a paraphrase of Karl Popper in Epistemology Without A Knowing Subject (1967): "Scientists try to eliminate their false theories, they try to let them die in their stead. The believer—whether animal or man—perishes with his false beliefs."

title: Alfred North Whitehead