text:
User:Annasmith683

P90X:A result Oriented Home Based Workout Program
P90X requirements no introduction. It genuinely is unquestionably the most beneficial physical exercise plan which has attracted fairly a handful of people across the globe. These days absolutely everyone desires to shed that further physique fat from the physique. Aside from seeking very good, you'll come across quite a few other brings about which have compelled the people to proceed to be in form. Obesity opens door to numerous conditions, this variety of as diabetes.

Persons are typically looking for forward to locate the solutions which could lead them in finding rid of additional extra fat. A latest research confirmed that higher than fifty % of the American grown ups are dealing with this trouble of serious bodyweight reduction.

For all these who don't want to drop beneath this group and for all individuals who want to do away with their further unwanted fat, P90X could be the extremely best resolution. As of late the P90X plan is now seriously properly-liked and there are a great deal of advertisements and infomercials acquiring telecasted on Tv and Web to boost awareness amongst the males and girls about P90X workout timetable.

You should be pondering what tends to make P90x so highly effective or irrespective of regardless of whether you want to obtain it or not. Allow me tell you, this exclusive coaching plan supplies you with a possibility to shed your sweat in your household as an alternative of gonna wellbeing club. Planning to gymnasium is not doable simply simply because of damn-active life-type demands. Lack of time to hit a wellbeing club influences our physique posture at the same time as helps make us obese. In purchase to avoid this, you should try out P90X at house and think about me it is not gonna disappoint you.

Simply because the plan arrives with 12 sets of DVDs for workout routines that are necessary to be adopted by way of the P90X physical workout program, it gets a lot less complex for you personally to find out the actions. You can rewind the DVD in the occasion you miss on a stage and play it as soon as a lot more and as soon as once again right up until ultimately you get it proper. Then, there's a fitness manual which you get if you purchase a P90X physical exercise routine. This guidebook will help you in dealing with the suggestions to be kept in brain even though following the P90X plan. The DVDs along with the technique would make it far more categorized and much less complex to stick to the program. Therefore, even a newbie can understand the program only following a handful of trials.

You can discover distinct phases of the P90X Plan which can be not associated to particular body elements but are concerned with every single entire body facet to guarantee that you just get to discover out alterations inside your total physique. You are heading to by no means get bored of P90X physical exercise schedules and will become suit and wholesome the moment additional.

There may possibly be a P90X dietary method that retains an look at in your consuming behavior. Improper consuming habits are 1 among the greatest motives that lead in gaining excessive bodyweight.

title: User:Annasmith683


text:
User talk:OpenScientist/Open grant writing/Encyclopaedia of original research

''Please use this page to provide feedback on our project. Don't shy away from harsh criticism if you can back it up.''

Grant writing vs. Encyclopedia project
Daniel, I'm having trouble sorting out what parts of this page is about "writing project proposals in the open", and what parts are about the "encyclopedia of original research". Also, what is the current status? Are you still in the process of writing a project proposal, or are you actually working on the project. I'd assume that you are in the process of trying to get some preliminary work together as proof-of-concept, in order to make the proposal stronger. Is that correct? So, if I just want to go and find out about/contribute to the encyclopedia project, where do I go? I would suggest that you or someone try to disentangle these two concepts, and create two separate pages here. Klortho 00:10, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

 * I hope that these edits answer your questions. If not, please keep asking. Thanks! --Daniel Mietchen (talk) 21:55, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Criticism regarding the ability to control quality in a wiki format
I floated this idea at a meeting, to some people affiliated with PMC, and I was a little taken aback at how quickly they shot the idea down. One person even said that this would be a blow to the open-access cause -- as a bad example of what could go wrong if open access goes too far. The concern, of course, is the same thing you hear about Wikipedia a lot, that editors and vandals will make all kinds of changes, and the quality of the most current versions of each of the articles will deteriorate over time. That, as soon as its on a wiki, it is no longer peer-reviewed, and could not / should not be trusted. I think that the concern is a very valid one, and even if not, it is certainly one that you will hear a lot. So I'd like to ask, do you have plans for how to curate the edits, in such a way as to control quality? Any other ways that you would address this argument? Klortho 00:11, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

 * The basic problem I see with this line of argumentation is that it more or less equates "wiki" and "[the English] Wikipedia" and then transfers to the former concerns about the latter, without further thought about their applicability. Bringing content onto a wiki - even a MediaWiki site - does not mean at all that anyone will necessarily be able to edit most (or even any) of that content. In fact, many wiki engines, including MediaWiki, come with options for a (sometimes very fine-grained) control over the user rights, e.g. whether they can edit or even read pages in a particular namespace (example scenario), or whether the edits they made are visible to the public (i.e. to users not logged in) or not (more on that). Also, the Wikipedias' approaches to fighting article deterioration are not uniform, and those used by the English Wikipedia (robots and many editors fighting vandalism, very few areas with some sort of institutionalized peer review in the scholarly sense) are not compulsory either: while some of their robots could certainly be used in scholarly contexts as well, the "many eyes" principle will rarely be applicable to this extent, due to the relatively low traffic to scholarly sites, and users will expect peer review to be at least regular across all fields represented in the encyclopaedia.

 * Many scholarly wikis have both very low rates of vandalism and site-wide peer review: take a look at Scholarpedia, Encyclopedia of Earth, Quantiki or NMR Wiki. While this is in part due to the low traffic they receive (which reduces the probability of spammers and vandals finding them attractive), the site's policies certainly contribute to that as well (an overview is here). Of the existing models mentioned therein, the ones that are closest to what we expect to be implemented at the Encyclopaedia of original research are those of the Encyclopedia of Earth (which, by the way, has long been collaborating actively with external content providers, similar to the role of PMC in our project) and of Scholarpedia. Also of interest to us is the Git way of handling commit rights. Both Git and Scholarpedia come close to the notion of "curation", as does the MediaWiki extension FlaggedRevs, which allows for a collaborative approach to it. In the long term, we also plan to couple user accounts (at least those used for curating) on our project with ORCID, which should further reduce the potential for article deterioration and might instead help develop a transparent reputation system, as alluded to here.

 * I would be interested in joining further discussions with your colleagues. Please let me know if further information or clarification is needed. Cheers, --Daniel Mietchen (talk) 01:15, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Concrete steps?
Hi, this project sounds wonderful. Have any concrete implementation plans been made? The "Description of Work" in the proposal PDF is blank, and the earlier http://species-id.net/wiki/Draft:Encyclopaedia_of_original_research#Tasks are a view from outer space -- "coding" is a task. :-)

I have skimmed the blog posts and don't remember seeing concrete implementation plans, though science3point0.com is not responding now, so I can't check at the moment. Also, http://www.science3point0.com/coaspedia/ a couple days ago was responding but with an error, so it was not possible to check out what the article calls a prototype.

Possibly the above would make the following questions superfluous, but I'll ask them anyway:
 * I'm guessing part of the plan is to use a new Semantic MediaWiki instance as the base of the repository. Is my guess right?
 * I'm not sure where git fits in the plan, but I'm guessing it does somehow. How?
 * I love the idea of reusing -- I think importing and wiki-formatting -- swathes of existing OA literature. But I'm not sure how such ties into the rest of the project, eg "living reviews". How? Maybe one way to attempt to ask this concretely is this: what drives a requirement to import literature into a repository, rather than just citing it (and of course occasionally copying databases and figures and text as needed for reviews or other views offered by the system?
 * Is there a particular field or subfield or subsubfield EOR hopes to build a community around early?

Thanks! Mike Linksvayer 01:01, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/


text:
Category:Wikipedia article studies

Pages in this category study Wikipedia articles and the editorial process there. Please avoid any personal attacks or criticism, but article history may be reported and studied, and associated Wikipedia process. Please keep all such discussion neutral on resource pages Opinions may be stated on the attached Talk pages, but civility policy should be rigorously followed, and uncivil comments may be removed. Raw evidence, however, is not uncivil, even if "cherry-picked." Evidence that is believed to be cherry-picked should be balanced rather than removed. Subpages may be used as needed for depth.

title: Category:Wikipedia article studies


text:
ACT Teaching Nursing Home Bid/Open forum - 24 March 2011

This page documents a forum held at the University of Canberra between 12noon and 5pm on 24 March 2011. Below is the draft program and a link to the webstreamed if you'd like to listen in online.

At the Forum, you will be invited to share your ideas about how to develop service delivery in the aged care sector generally, including ways to engage educational and research programs as part of these solutions. If you're participating online please forward your suggestions to Laurie dot Grealish at canberra dot edu dot au. You are also invited to leave comment on this wiki, in the discussion page (see above) or via instant message on the webstream.

After the forum, this page will evolve into

 * A comment was made that the use of the word "nursing home" excludes other people and organisations offering aged care. The same commenter challenged the focus on registered nurses and enrolled nurses, pointing out that they make up a relatively small percentage of the workforce, so the language of the proposal needs to encompass volunteers, community carers, etc. Essentially suggesting that the proposal needs to aim to encompas the full spectrum of aged care.

 * Be mindful of the gaps possibly generated between what the Commonwealth identifies aged, what medicare identifies as aged care, what insurance companies and funding bodies identify. The suggestion is that the proposal should be mindful of potential gaps, and try to fill them.
 * Nicky: Wish list :aged care and current landscape, qualifications, education. Helpful to review and how to improve. Carers in aged care don't have to be registered. Others to include: GPs and all stakeholders. Right care, right place, right time. Walk in clinic and chronic care opportnity. Outreach attached to walkin clinics, who go out to the homeless, and those living rough. Specific area in a facility that care for youger onset and other conditions. Support in residential care models. More beds and more opportunities for students. Reduce acute increase placement. Other partnerships.
 * Marg: Bid to cover clinical governance. Identify gaps include dental (Bathurst). Teaching facilities need to have best practice and innovative models. Development of a learning culture in facilities. Community consultation. Community and in-home care models. Lifestyle issues, such as CIT offerings such as landscaping, hospitality, to help improve lifestyle. Synergies with vocation and tertiary. manage student expectations.
 * Kasia: allied health in regional areas - Opportunities in TAFE and universities to offer support, career pathways, hubs and training pathways. Multidisciplinary admissions. Student led services - reduces the money and paper focus, and increases the learning focus, people focused. Expanding student led services out to community (outreach). Bus opportunities. Oral health. What focus: person, learner? Community based wellness services linked to student led facilities. Continuity of care. Social biographies, understanding patients. Inter-professional tools. Rich media opportunities. Community developments. Community development - eden principles - schools - RACF to go to IT classes in schools.

 * Jo: Marxist Feminist analysis of health sector: noting gender bias in the sector, and the undervaluing underfunding of the sector. Boundaries are permiable. Continuous collaborative capacity. Aged Care - outdated model. Aging - people with dissabilities living longer and longer. Open community flow of learning. We need better understanding of ageing new cateories. Permeability ... Reimagine what we do and how we do it.. eg, rather than a community garden for just rezs, but a garden with the wider community. Architectures to build communities not facilities. MIT lab and innovative practice. How this ideal community could be used to re educate the professionals. Its not just formal learning, informal, genuine, one to one, just in time, situated and networked learning. Continuous community learning to share problems.
 * Mark: enablers. Link practice and policy. Individualised evidence based practice. Exciting learning communities, that motivates or captures people into the aged care 'workforce'. Multidsciplinary teams. Development of education pathways. Family focus for inclusion. Skilled workers in the community particularly in rural communities. WOrkers in aged care home, and out in the community, such as in rural areas where one can have many roles. Populations: cultural differences. Architecture and design of homes. Universal design. Aged care without walls.

Barriers

 * Jenny: Resourcing the lead in to the project, if the infrastructure isn't put in place then it could fall over. Leave sufficient lead in time. IT is in place. Making sure the project budget has enough in it. Making sure procedual things are in place. Existing staff may feel threatened and perhaps lack confidence to offer teachings. Communication will need to managed carefully. Provide clinical training to the educators. Assigned specific staff to be educators. Legislative barriers, particularly ACT to NSW such as wage differences. Rural doesn't have the same infastructure. Take care of student orientation. Accredit educators as well as training, support and payment (Cert 4 T&A?). Ensure students aren't exploited as free labor. Upskill existing staff, such as subcare competency. As well as existing staff to upskill and progress. NBN provides an opportunity for treatment and specialist consultation in site.

 * Greg: Aged Care is a competative industry, may generate colllusion, particularly around tenders and reducing the size of the potential pie. Not much translation from pilot studies into actual change practice. State vs Federal funding, such as Uni and TAFE, State funded hospitals vs homes under federal funding. Problems with post clinic care. Multidsiciplinary dream - how can we make this a reality? Language and terminology may exclude people and concepts. Privacy can become an issue in th eopen and inclusive model, such as police checks requirement for people coming into the facility.

 * Hamish: Engagement with professional bodies might be a problem if we are seen as a hub for skills and regulations. At some point this project will need to establish a round table for all these bodies, etc. We'll need to identify barriers, competitions, etc. Sensitivity is needed in that one sector or organisation may dominate the conversation. Self censorship may become a problem to envisioning different practices. Employer attitudes might present problems regarding responsibilities and roles relating to time and funding. How do we manage the primary goal and didrection (communication again).

 * Mark: Multiple sites need to accessed, but risk of few engaging. Educational pathways, recognition and competition between departments and institutions could present barriers. Who is supervising and who is supervising? Are the supervisors experts from each discipline? Learning culture change may be difficult.

 * Research other funds that could be linkage funding into the project, rather than relying on one big fund.

 * Pathways for career advance will be important

 * Reminder that if work is going on the home, then that requires extra and different sensativity

Summary
.