text:
User talk:Sj

= Old discussion =

other licenses
Thanks for the poke! I've just updated my user page to note that I'm contributing all of my content on this wiki to the public domain. —mako 17:38, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

WCR is Wiki Campus Radio
Hi Sj. I think you might wanna see Wiki Campus Radio. (just guessing) -- CQ 02:20, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * that's awesome; thanks! Sj 23:14, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

mentat wiki month
The Mentat wiki month page has been updated to actually show what's going on and how you can participate (or at least how I'm doing it) - come on over and join the fun! (also, why is it that everywhere I go on the interwebs, you're already there? :P) Mchua 20:12, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

User:Sj/thoughts
ping --mikeu talk 15:00, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the ping, mike! I'll get back to this in a bit.  Sj

Thanks SJ:)Sound advice for a new wiki user like myself. Cheers, u118827

original welcome
= New discussion =

Category:Namespace cleanup
I look forward to seeing what you tag as being in the wrong namespace. However I hope you can understand that essays are educational and can belong in the main namespace, discussions can be educational and can also belong in the namespace. Are not personal essays often in the project (Wikiversity) namespace on other wikimedia projects too? For example Wikipedia: Category:Wikipedia essays. -- dark lama  00:21, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi darklama, I only found that one article so far, but I expect that a lot of the original research people do starts life as a personal essay (when would that be appropriate for the main namespace?), which should be tagged as an essay, not as 'course material about topic X'. And discussions, unless they are directly discussions about a learning project or material, belong on talk pages -- that's what they're for.  Some essays definitely belong in the project namespace; others do not.  There's a fine line between the two sometimes, but unwikified personal notes or sandboxes of a single person belong in the user: namespace, not attributed to the community at large.   –SJ +  00:28, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I think pages that start life as a personal essay are fine in the main namespace to begin with if they want other people to contribute to it, expand it, improve it, and perhaps turn it into more than just an essay. If a page says "course material about topic X" I think that means the author intends for it to be expanded into something more than just an essay. Discussion pages are often used for course maintenance tasks for lack of better description. Other things like discussing the topic of the course is often done both in the main namespace and talk page. Going naked - Openism and freedom in academia and Talk:Going naked - Openism and freedom in academia comes to mind as an example of discussion about the topic that happens in both places. Unwikified personal notes or sandboxes I would need to see before I could comment on where I think it belongs. Some sandboxes may be fine in the project namespace like if its a sandbox of the main page, or a subpage of another page maybe. Unwikified personal notes might just need to be wikified and moved to the main namespace depending on what it is. -- dark lama  00:46, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Maybe use a template to categorize pages and word the template text as a question? Like "Should this page be in the namespace? (discuss)" -- dark  lama  00:54, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * This is a wiki, feel free to edit templates or other pages as you see fit. Wikiversity currently suffers from a remarkable cleanup backlog; most pages need at least a bit of basic cleanup and thousands of pages need major cleanup.  Don't get hung up on minor details... –SJ +  01:13, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * My last comment was intended to cut to the chase so as not to mistake my input as getting hung up on the details and could just move forward with the doing. Wikiversity participants like to ask questions and discuss. I am thinking any clean up ideas you might have in mind could benefit from use of categories+templates that asks a question and points to the talk page for discussion. -- dark lama  01:29, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I understand. I am copying the 'cleanup' templates which do point to the page's talk page.  I don't know how to phrase the statement as a question --  my intent is to encourage any second person coming across the page to boldly cleanup/move the page, and discuss only if they feel it is necessary.  A question would encourage any second person to discuss, and only cleanup/move if they feel it is necessary.  –SJ +  02:09, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Purely Book Material?
I was surprised that you thought the work I had done on Artificial Consciousness was purely book material, or that you would think that it would get a fair hearing on Wikibooks. I started out just to fill in data on the field for dionysis who is long since gone.
 * It does seem to be good book material you've been developing. Aside from the OR issues, which may merit splitting it into two pieces, I would expect that sort of material to be appropriate for (and welcome on) WB, in theory.  And I realize now there is more OR involved than I expected -- that might benefit from being more clearly indicated here.  –SJ +

So it was originally part of his course outline I don't know what portion. Then as I worked I realized that it was a survey course of the current understandings on Artificial Consciousness, I wanted to capture the state before my Portals research started.
 * Interesting. Is the original course outline/concept thereof posted anywhere?

Now you may kick that it doesn't have the teacher support stuff that it should have, but, I have been working alone on it, and I am not a teacher. What do you want in the way of support documents? I don't think there is anywhere in "What Wikiversity is" that it suggests that articles and courses have to have a specific format, but if you have decided to be the format police I think you should at least, discuss the issue first before labelling a course for transwiki.
 * I don't have specific thoughts re: support documents beyond the ones listed in my transwiki comment, I just would like to see collaboration b/t WV and WB whereby courses rely on texts on WB, and texts refer to course outlines, discussions, problems, exam ideas, and discussions about classroom use on WV. I'm not labelling the course for transwiki, since this is the place for any and all course material.  I'm suggesting that any textbook-style materials being used as part of the course might be usefully transwiki'ed.  This is more clear for the C++ book, but seemed relevant for your AC course material as well.   –SJ +  06:13, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Related topic - I think that there's a gray area around reading packets, where a series of vaguely related readings with discussion belong on WV, but draft chapters from a future book belong on WB... what do you think? –SJ +

Especially if the work has any problems for Wikibooks. As you may know I have worked with Wikibooks and this type of information might not be acceptable to them because it borders on Original research, if only by putting the data together in a novel way that is not well supported with quotes.--Graeme E. Smith 14:34, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, I can see separating out the possible-OR from the background-material, where again solid background with references (which your material has in abundance) would be good for WB, and perhaps a different superstructure with OR and novel articulation belongs on WV. –SJ +  06:13, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Inexplicable physics articles
I wanted to note that I blocked the IP for adding another one that clearly came from another source (or sources) without any notice of said source. This is a common trend. I will be unblocking once they realize the problem and show willingness to discuss the other problems (and hopefully register too). Ottava Rima (talk) 14:06, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you! –SJ +  01:03, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

fyi
I noticed your comments over at the open letter project, and in particular your feeling that the 'how to detect etc.' project was a good way forward. I haven't (yet) taken the opportunity to find and review that project (though I must!) - but I thought you might like to have a look at Wikimedia_Ethics/Response_testing_on_WMF_projects - as I mentioned on the colloquium a few days back, I think that's where I see the best foot forward :-) Got any spare time to join? cheers, Privatemusings 01:25, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Hello PM, as I said to you the other day, while I think that one can extract something that could help Wikipedia and sister projects from your initial idea, I don't think that you should take it on as your next project. As for contributing,  I don't see this as an especially useful topic - there are more efficient ways to study how to improve contribution to or usability of Wikipedia, and WV has more immediate issues to resolve. –SJ +  07:53, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

MediaWiki:Portal-url
Tx - fixed now. -- Jtneill - Talk - c 12:26, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

The Near Death Experience as Possible Evidence for any Afterlife
Please explain in more detail what is your criticism? How do you want me to improve the project? Do others here agree with you? Proxima Centauri 09:27, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Possible sock puppets
The following user pages were made in evenly spaced apart times and contained copies of the main page. User:Jaunminigreat2, User:9Kggmuopkj, and User:Qyesq. Their contributions were minimal (mostly deleted or reverted) and had highly questionable behavior.

This suggests that they were possibly blocked somewhere. Ottava Rima (talk) 20:18, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

 * The diff is from the first one listed. The cross wiki contrib log of Qyesq shows that they were blocked by the person they complained about being blocked by. It is possible that Qyesq was the main (or the current main of that incarnation). Ottava Rima (talk) 20:22, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Creation of a new namespace
Hi Sj. As suggested by User:Ottava Rima, may I make you a request for comment on User talk:Ottava Rima, whether from the WV or WM perspective? --KYPark 02:13, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Foundation
"rather than everyone simply chuckling and moving on, I would have kept it for my own amusement."

A moderator should not display copyrighted material in a public area, releasing it via GFDL without authorization, and doing so for people to get a "chuckle". I expect him to be admonished and removed for such an egregious violation. At the very minimum, I seek to have my copyrighted material there and throughout (as two emails were forwarded to the list) to be removed with any replies containing the material to be removed. Mockery is not an excuse to steal copyrighted material and release it without authorization. Ottava Rima (talk) 17:21, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Two proposed policies need discusson
Please see. I am contacting regulars and admin so we can start going through our proposed policies and establish some. Ottava Rima (talk) 16:31, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Human Legacy Course
I completely agree with what you stated on my talk page. I'm really not recruiting my students from anywhere as they just show up and come to the course. We are currently starting our 4th week right now, but if you would like to join the course, then that would be absolutely fine. I will consider that wiki-journal and have my students leave their feedback in it.

Also, I do agree with you that we should try to send out announcements about the schedule of courses and how other students can get involved because I have seen some students that are a little confused regarding the Wikiversity format. --MrABlair23 14:20, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Your steward hat
This happened without discussion by an inactive Crat.

SB Johnny states: "Things are a bit out of balance, and I'd like to perform a few actions in the interests of restoring that balance."

This makes it clear that he believes that Thekohser's account should be renamed then renamed again to break the SUL and the global lock. This is without community discussion and also with a complete disregard for a two year long plus track record of cross Wiki abuse with using Wikiversity as a platform to attack the Foundation.

SB Johnny also created a competing Wiki-like project. I have a feeling that it would be necessary for the Foundation to intervene along with a few key desysopings to prevent a clear outsider from abusing his authority in a way that can only possibly destroy Wikiversity as a project. Ottava Rima (talk) 00:52, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

 * "A few key desysopings"! Accepting the idea of such aggressive action seems to me the greatest threat to Wikiversity as a project.  Please assume good faith, and use less polarizing language.  A few specific replies:
 * Mike is reasonably active by Wikiversity standards. (I suppose the only one of the 5 'crats here who you would call active is Jtneill?)  SBJ has made important contributions here and generally kept a level head, and is neither an outsider nor someone interested in harming the project.
 * I see nothing negative about people creating similar 'competing' projects. A more vibrant ecosystem of similar projects each with its own spirit and culture would be useful, and the great thing about the licenses we choose is that anyone working under those licenses is contributing to the same public commons. While SBJ's stated reasons for returning may sound activist, and I'm not sure that local standards have been set for how and when to restore tools, I trust Mike's judgement.
 * It is not appropriate for people to use Wikiversity as a platform to air personal grievances of any sort. That does not seem to be in question, and the WV community is fully able to keep discussions civil.  (If anything, you will find the most strongly-worded grievances on Wikipedia, since it has more people and more drama.) –SJ +  02:04, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

 * Hi Sj. Don't worry, I'm still level-headed :-).
 * Just for the record on the "competing Wiki-like project": it's not a competition, it's just something different. It's a "social contract community" with human beings taking the place of captcha. Hopefully it will be something I'll feel comfortable with my young daughter using (or my septagenarian mother!), where there's little risk of running across goatse or scary people. And better software for the bloom clock, of course.
 * I've got a lot of emotional investment in wv. I'm not at all sure what I personally can do to improve things (or at least stop the rapid decline), but it seems like just being here as a crat has already made some small difference in shifting the dynamic. There's hope in that!
 * I'll do my best to provide pillows before I start knocking heads :-). --SB_Johnny talk 03:38, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Your responses to HHF
Hi SJ! I see you have posted a question regarding Highschool Help Forum a few months back.

It's great that my work got noticed.

I have an idea for us to make the highschool help forum more useful and productive. Specifically meant for content generation. I want it to become an exhaustive resource for those who are studying the topic - through an input that is given drop by drop to make up the ocean.

I have had several thoughts as to what makes Wikiversity a little slow - having contributed to wikibooks myself. Please drop me a message as soon as possible! --Dharav talk 15:12, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Your RfD on A Translation of the Bible
. I appreciate this opportunity to clarify more of what Wikiversity is about.

In a university, students prepare independent projects, different teachers may prepare and present a course on the same topic in different ways. The Wikisource Bible is a unified project, where, apparently, editors come to consensus on translation. Or work on separate chapters, I don't know the nuts and bolts, but I see that only one translation is presented.

As a Muslim, I'm quite sensitive to the error of considering a translation as the original. The Wikisource page is simply titled Bible (Wikisource). That's correct. This is the Wikisource translation of the Bible, through a Wikisource project. No other translation is a duplication of it, and one approach to study of these ancient source texts is to read multiple translations.

There is a further issue. The author here is blocked there, for reasons unrelated to content abuse. Working on translation here creates separate value, but also might eventually be ported there, or be the basis for further revisions there, all according to consensus there. Explicit study comparing translations may be done here, Wikiversity is designed for this. There, comparison would be for the purpose of choosing "what's best." Here, it would be for the purpose of learning and deepening knowledge.

There is no other place in the WMF family that is like Wikiversity in this respect, fostering discussion and study and debate, as ends in themselves. On Wikipedia, for example, discussion is limited, often enforced as such, to what is necessary to consider article changes. Here, topics may be discussed for learning and educational purpose. For this reason, I believe, edit warring is rare here, we handle content conflicts differently.

Thanks for your consideration. --Abd 18:23, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Alteration of comments after response to them by others.
See. This has also happened on meta. It is traditional, if a response has been posted to a post, perhaps criticizing it, to leave the original in place, using strike-out to reflect changes, perhaps with brackets to show correcting insertions. Without this, the responses cannot be understood. If, say, an editor makes a personal attack, and another editor refers to this as such. If the first editor redacts the text without using strikeout, the second editor looks like he's unreasonably attacking the second! Thanks for your attention to this. I thought of correcting your posts, but decided it was better to trust you to do that! --Abd 23:16, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

 * Thanks. That's an improvement. May I ask that you use edit summaries to briefly describe the content of your edits? It makes it easy for others to track what you are doing. No obligation, of course, just what I've learned to be helpful. --Abd 18:13, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Community Review/Custodianship process
Hi SJ - if/when you have a moment, your thoughts about how we might improve the English Wikiversity custodianship process would be appreciated. -- Jtneill - Talk - c 18:26, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Hello Jtneill, I replied briefly on that page. It seems to me the main thing WV needs is more active custodians, more people organizing courses, and less drama.  Recruiting educators of various sorts to come contribute may address all of these issues at once.  –SJ +  20:28, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

User:Abd/Wikipedia/List of self-reverted edits
Sj, in your comments on my probationary custodianship, you describe the subject page as if it were a cross-wiki dispute. Can you clarify that, based on what's actually on the page? User talk:Abd/Wikipedia/List of self-reverted edits is open, and if there is anything there that violates Wikiversity policy, or that harms another wiki (which is distinct from documenting possible harm on another wiki), it should be removed immediately. (Specifically, what's the "dispute" on that page? It's just a record of actions and responses, practically pure evidence.)

I'm very concerned about what is appearing as a campaign to attack Wikiversity independence. Can you allay my fears, or are they justified? Thanks. --Abd 20:05, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Your questions at my Candidates for custodianship page
I've responded to your questions there, but this will be more detailed than what would be appropriate on the CC page, where the real issue is just what affects Wikiversity, but you ask questions with wider import.

By the way, on Wikiversity, probationary custodianship is not a community poll, and support/oppose at this point is inappropriate, my opinion. But you have the right to your opinion.

 * Why are you flouting Wikipedia policy and documenting it here on Wikiversity? How do you see that further the goals of Wikiversity?
 * I have answered this in the RfD, in the collapse box presently near the end, and also on the Talk page for the documentation page. Briefly, though, I'm disregarding, not exactly "flouting," an implied policy that does not apply, paradoxically, to banned users. Policies govern users, in a way, but do not coerce user behavior. Rather, they guide how other users respond to user behavior. So if a user is blocked, for that user to edit, aside from as specifically permitted, is grounds for further sanctions, and my position has been that a block is a site ban for the period of the block, and that the distinction between blocks and bans is mostly pedantic. A block is a site ban determined by an implementing administrator.
 * The WMF may coerce behavior, through legal injunctions, as Newyorkbrad hinted in his mails to Arbcomm, leaked. (He'd also written some of this directly to me). That is, I'm easily identified, real-world, and if the WMF were exercised, it could obtain, on a showing of fact adequate for a court, an injunction against my editing the site. Absent that, I have no legal or moral obligation to refrain from editing. I would defend against an injunction, but I would follow one that was issued. It would be expensive for the WMF, and the benefit justifying that expense would be?
 * ArbComm and the administrative community have no such coercive power, response is limited, in the extreme, to bans, blocking, range blocking, edit filtering, and revision deletion or oversight. As I assume you know, policy is w:WP:RBI. If that were followed, there would be far less problem. It isn't followed, too often, resulting in unnecessary disruption. Demonstrating the reality of enforcement practice, whatever it is, is one of the goals of my disregard of the blocks. Disruption from my behavior has been entirely the result of over-enforcement. Consider the self-reverted edits. They leave behind no mess to clean up. An self-reverting editor, I've argued, unless the edits themselves create a problem (like copyvio or serious libel), may be blocked, or not, and a mature approach, one that I'm advocating, is that self reversion for harmless edits that formally violate a ban or block would never be grounds for blocking, they would not be considered ban violations at all, unless they are causing an actual problem. They are merely an efficient way for a banned editor to make a suggestion. Nobody is obligated to pay any attention to it at all. But that doesn't satisfy those who actually want to exclude the editor's POV.
 * The same issues apply here. Self-reversion -- look at that documentation page! -- was used here to establish a pattern of cooperation and good content contribution for Thekohser. The process works, and the result was positive. Unless you believe that Thekohser must be blocked No Matter What. People do not understand SR editing because it's outside the box, it is contrary to what many have expected for years. The only way to get this across is to demonstrate it. When people can see the results, they understand. That process is not complete, I'd say. But it (or something better) will come, through me or through someone else. If Poetlister is globally banned, watch for it with him, he might take this on under some conditions. And if you don't like that, I suggest you bite your wrist, it will be more useful. Sorry to be blunt!
 * You have chronicled a few small factual corrections that were accepted on Wikipedia; do you see this as a significant contribution to the goals of that project?
 * In themselves, no. However, the patterns and processes shown can be a major contribution to that project, resolving, potentially, problems that have afflicted Wikipedia for many years. I'm asking, Sj, that if you want to judge this now, before it is all documented and analyzed, with consensus conclusions -- not just by me! -- you will need to, likewise, think outside the box, because it is the box that has trapped Wikipedia into continued dysfunction, maintained disruption, and fundamental failure to realize, reliably, neutrality policy.
 * Why do you think that it is still appropriate for you to be a custodian here - presumably someone who would uphold local policies - given your efforts to violate the policies of a sister wiki?
 * It's really irrelevant. My efforts are not to "violate the policies" of a sister wiki, but to call on it, through examples, to follow its own policies, the policies are excellent. If they were actually followed! Because my work with Wikipedia is a very long-term project, started in earnest in 2007, based on structural considerations developed over about thirty years, I'm not about to abandon that work in favor of the right to take out the trash at Wikiversity. Like many Wikipedians, Sj, you seem to think of admin tools as a reward of some kind. No, it's an opportunity to do boring work, of little enduring interest. I am, with the self-reversion (and related socking that is not self-reverted, to show what happens when range blocks are issued for harmless editing), doing something of possibly world significance. Being a custodian here will actually inhibit that to some degree, for reasons I won't explain, but you can figure out some, I'm sure. If nothing else, I'll have more work to do that accomplishes nothing but a cleaner workspace here. Others could do that. Maybe Poetlister, if he's interested! He certainly has the skills and the proven track record, if only he refrains from socking here. I think he might be willing to do that, but I haven't asked him yet. Something entirely missing from all the process with Poetlister: asking him for voluntary, non-coerced compliance, which requires a quid pro quo. What actually happened with him should not happen to anyone: blackmail, tacitly approved by ArbComm.
 * I have already been a probationary custodian here for two extensive periods, both terminated abnormally, effectively by a single user, himself desysopped and damned near banned, here and on meta. I have a record that can be examined, and that's why one of the 'crats has supported my third candidacy. The other doesn't like that I write too much, to make it brief, and also maybe that I've criticized what I saw as his unnecessarily thoughtless actions. I continue to work with that 'crat and have continued to work for cleanup and content and welcoming users and deletion process, whatever I can do without tools. Every day I see something where I could make a contribution if I had the buttons, and none of this would be controversial. I do what I can do with speedy deletion templates. You know, most of those are placed in mainspace, but they don't show up in my contributions unless you look at deleted contributions! Most of my work is far from dramatic, you look at what seems dramatic to you, and then assert this as the whole banana, that's again a common Wikipedia mistake.
 * May I suggest, Sj, that you do not seem concerned, in your comments, about the welfare of Wikiversity, but about external political considerations? Is this an unfair comment? Please relieve me of any misunderstandings! --Abd 21:24, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

One more point. I asked, early on, for anyone thinking what I was doing on Wikipedia was harmful, to talk with me about it here. I think that was revision-deleted, if I recall correctly. Wikipedia has the idea that it can gain compliance with bans by ignoring the banned editor, entirely. That may work for the banned whose motive is "attention." Tell me, Sj, how well has that been working with the rest? Or even with those who seriously are demanding attention? Scibaby? Have you ever looked into the origins of the Scibaby sock farm? --Abd 21:24, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
 * If you have insight into other sock farms or puppet theaters, I would be glad to hear them. –SJ +  03:59, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The w:User:Scibaby sock farm started when Scibaby was blocked by an involved administrator, who became, later, as a checkuser, heavily involved in "protecting" Wikipedia from Scibaby. The resulting disruption(s), including many false accusations of "being Scibaby," and massive range blocks, continued for years, including today. I spent a fair amount of time reviewing the origins of this, and it did receive some Foundation-level attention, and that checkuser eventually resigned. But the damage continues. Scibaby was not, as a new user, welcomed, but was harassed, and clearly because his point of view was opposite to that of those editors who owned the relevant article at the time. This was related to what was eventually brought to ArbComm by myself, in my own last case, and later by Lar, more explicitly, with the Climate Change arbitration. It's never been deeply addressed, how much damage involved admins can cause, all the while believing that they are protecting Wikipedia. Possible solutions are generally rejected as unworkable. Assembly is an attempt to demonstrate a piece of a solution that has never been tried. Please consider registering as a member, on Delegable proxy/Table. Thanks. --Abd 16:51, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

Canvassing for your RfD?
You notified the following editors regarding Requests for Deletion, besides the primary author, User:Poetlister. (Your habit of avoiding descriptive edit summaries makes research a little difficult, but this is what I find.)
 * Ottava Rima
 * SB Johnny
 * Guido den Broeder
 * Adrignola
 * John Vandenberg

You did not notify the following users who commented in the original RfD:
 * JWSchmidt
 * Anonymous Uploader
 * Mu301
 * Moulton
 * Geoff Plourde (closer)

You also did not notify me, but I'd already commented in the new RfD.

Have you engaged in selective notification? Did you use subjective standards to determine whom to notify? Thanks. --Abd 01:34, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Moulton and JWSchmidt are now blocked here, Anonymous Uploader didn't express an opinion, and I missed the other two. Corrected. –SJ +  03:58, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

by the way, thanks
I've been noticing all the work you are doing here. Thanks. --Abd 04:53, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Your requested undeletions
Now that I'm a probationary custodian, I was able to satisfy your request for undeletion of certain pages:
 * Image:ExampleA.jpg
 * Image:ExampleB.jpg
 * Image:ELEN7015_sol_a.jpg
 * Image:ELEN7015_sol_b.jpg

Because the original deletion reason was within policy, I am not deciding the ultimate fate of these files. I have added a slow deletion category to the pages, and assume that they will, if license problems are not fixed, be deleted, after some decent pause. However, because the original uploader did obviously intend to give permission for their use, under the license that existed at the time, I strongly suspect that some solution can be found to keep the pages, which were used in a resource that this user created and obviously expected to continue being hosted. If you can fix the license, or if we develop a policy to keep such pages that is acceptable to the WMF, then the slow deletion category may be removed. Thanks. --Abd 18:20, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Notice of speedy deletions
You have not responded with respect to these pages. I am changing the slow deletion tag to a speedy deletion tag. If you wish these pages kept, please remove the tag and take responsibility for them, or, if nobody else takes responsibility, they will be deleted, presumably after a week. Thanks. --Abd 16:35, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

This is actually an experiment in what could become large-scale, efficient, deliberative process, normally considered an oxymoron. Please consider registering. Thanks. --Abd 18:15, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Abd's nomination for full custodianship
Discussion re-opened on this nomination, November 16. You commented in the original discussion, but have not commented in the current one, which might close on November 21. The current discussion is at Candidates for Custodianship/Abd (full custodian). --Abd 20:29, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sj


text:
User talk:JRasmussen

Image copyright problem with Image:Edcover.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Edcover.gif. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikiversity because of copyright law (see Wikiversity' Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikibooks are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information or giving false information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at Colloquim. Thank you. – Mike.lifeguard | talk 23:35, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Principiablack.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Principiablack.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or PD-self to release it into the public domain. See commons:Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. TeleComNasSprVen (discuss • contribs) 05:10, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: User talk:JRasmussen


text:
User talk:Benjamin Mako Hill

licensing
Dear BMH, Is your work on this wiki available under more than just the GFDL? Sj 21:46, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * It's all in the public domain now. Thanks for the prompting. —mako 17:39, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

title: User talk:Benjamin Mako Hill


text: User talk:TuHeinz

title: User talk:TuHeinz


text:
User talk:Juandev

Test and Quiz
Hello Juan, I have replied to your question here. --Erkan Yilmaz 18:51, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Spanish speakers
To find other teachers, please look at the lists here and here. You can also find potential students on both of those pages. The Jade Knight 22:08, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Ou, thanks and also for copyediting. I will have a look next week.--Juan 14:36, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * No problem. I've hit some of the major things that will cause comprehension problems, but many of them still could use further proofreading.  I highly recommend you check out the English Language Department and the Writing Center and check out some of the resources there to brush up on your English.  If you're not sure what a word is in English, Wiktionary can be helpful, as well as the English Wikipedia (I use this method all the time for French words I don't know).  The Jade Knight 10:02, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
 * OK, next time Ill try to do better job. I will use Microsoft Word to corect my texts. I promise.--Juan 12:11, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

ayudar
Yo puedo ayudar, pero coordínate con Spanish One y poned bien claro lo que se puede hacer, no es nada evidente para los que entramos por aquí
 * Es que aquí tenemos dos sistemas diferentes de la enseňaza, pero inmentaré a hacer algo con esto. Quizá la semana que viene.--Juan 18:34, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

 * Aunque hace tiempo que no edito en la Wikiversidad, no me he desvinculado. Ahora estoy preparando una encuesta sobre el uso de wikis para aprender vocabulario. Disculpa que no pueda ayudarte en estos momentos. De todas formas estaré pendiente de tus aportaciones. Además, te comento, por si no lo sabías, que acaban de implementar la extensión para hacer pruebas de conocimiento en Wikiversidad. Espero que la puedas sacar provecho. Un saludo, --Javier Carro 14:00, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Muchas gracias por tu respuesta y por el enlace. Aquí an la wikiversidad existen low "scripts" para examinar, pero para mí muy difíciles. Necesito algo más fácil. Espero que ese en mediawiki sería mejor. Si se trata del vocabulario eso es lo que necesitamos para los cursos de las lenguas aquí para los estudiantes - diccionario útil. Es que Wikcionario en inútil usamos los diccionarios externos. Quizá Sendbox server nos dará una platforma nueva. Ahora solomante puedo preparar con otros la databasis de las palabras como ha mostrado en la discusion aquí.--Juan 14:13, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Topic:Spanish
Hi Juan - i just saw this comment you made a while back. I'm just interested - what do you mean by "an unfriendly environment" at the old Topic:Spanish page? It'd be good to know how to make things a little friendlier. :-) Salud. Cormaggio talk 00:10, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Well. "Unfriendly environment" was a html script there. Template, which I uploaded there is friendlier to edits, but of course it will be still... Anyway someone may say that the future appereance was friendlier than this. So it is a question. I had to change its source code, cus I coudlnt support that code by new data (lot of time looking what fits where.--Juan 13:47, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

fr wikiversity
I have just seen your comment and I'm sorry to answer your question so late, if  you always need a poster contact me on the french wikiversity fr:Utilisateur:Vivelefrat

spanish course
It says to register or sign in. How do I do that. I am very interested in learning Spanish for personel use as well as for work. Please an suggestion as to improve my spanish and to join different classes would be greatly appriciated
 * Well, it sais. But I am not actually having a computer at home so, I can support the spanish courses so much as I would like. Anyway, you allready now a little bit of Spanish. I so it woudl be better to meet e.g via skype?--Juan 11:47, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Hola
Hi Juan. Your invitation made my day. The previous work on this page was something too cold and naive. It irritated me so I left. I've checked your proposal and is very good. I think it's very important, to make it more faster, to create that IRC channel. I would like to colaborate, as a teacher (I'm native speaker) and with recordings. I'd like to meet you also to coordinate better --Elnole 01:01, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

 * Nice to here that. I think our students are a little bit pissed off, but they dont understand that it is not a fun, to make a lively course. Anyway, recently a few people started to do lessons - so thats good. I think we need to apply slogan of Wikiversity of "Studying by doing" teachers will just coordinate students and practice with them. Students on other hand will study and slowly, make a teaching content wich will be controlled by us. Anyway, have you seen my concept on Spanish: An Introduction? There are still some of the technical difficulties, thats why it slowed down its development. I hope people from service and support will help us more in the future, that we can do our work more effective.--Juan 13:09, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

OK. When be back here on wikiversity lets record some words and during that time I might prepare some text. Now I am ready to buy a computer and internet to home, so everything will hopefully go faster.--Juan 10:47, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Note
I left a reply for you at Wikiversity talk:Support staff. McCormack 12:53, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Hola
Hello Juan! I'm a university student studying Spanish with the intent of becoming a professor and I'd love to help with the Spanish division project. Just drop me a line and let me know what I can do to help.

Thanks, klmv

 * Are you able to record pronunciation? If so, could you record orange words from these sites: Spanish: An Introduction/Pronunciation and Spanish: An Introduction/Pronunciation. If not, there is also a need to build up a second lesson here: Spanish: An Introduction/Hola. Anyway, we maight have an skype or IRC chat with other people and coordinate our work in here. There is a lot to do. And we have one advantage, that there is a continuous interest for Spanish courses.--Juan 10:44, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Regarding private foundation
Hi Juan, I think you are referring to an idea to establish a foundation dedicated to just Wikiversity. At the time the Wikimedia Foundation had been stalling over whether to authorize Wikiversity on its servers for several years. The idea generated no interest and a lot of hostility so I have not pursued it. At this time support from Wikimedia Foundation seems adequate so I see no need for a competing Foundation. Thanks for the inquiry. user:mirwin
 * Now I see what you ment.--Juan 19:04, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Bloom Clock stuff
Hi Juan,

Interesting talking to you on IRC and your talk at the same time :). Here's the scoop:

When there is a log page available, add your signature there, rather than on the text list (otherwise it just has to be moved later). The easiest way is to just hit the little edit link above the recent logs list.

Then add templates to the BCP profile. I only set them up for this account (Juan) so far:
 * add bcp/prag/10 to categorize for "blooming in October in Prague"
 * if you want to add the status as well, add bcp/prag/np for native plants, bcp/prag/ip for invasive plants, and/or bcp/prag/gp for cultivated plants (plants can of course be both invasive and cultivated, or native and cultivated).

More on the keys later, but the unsorted key for Prague in October is Bloom Clock/Keys/Prague/October/All. --SB_Johnny | talk 13:11, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

solar system
hi, and thanks for your work on the solar system pages. I noticed that Solar System/Earth/Solar System overwiev has an incorrect spelling of "overview" in the title. The pages in Category:Solar System should probably be renamed. Let me know if you need any help with this by leaving a message at my talk page.--mikeu 00:23, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

 * Thanks Ive correct it.--Juan 11:37, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Wmdgs-wikipedia-survey2
Hi Juan. I was looking at this template, and noticed a number of issues with it (sorry) :). First, you're not really using #switch correctly, so the box and category displays won't work... I started a replacement template at Wmdgs-wikipedia-survey2a, where you should be able to see the switching language used better. Wmdgs-makesurveyquestion-2 can help you design future questions that have 2 possible answer (I'm trying to catch hold of darkcode to create on that allows any number of answers).

Otherwise, I'm not sure about a few of the actual topics.
 * 1) "IP/registered" and "number of accounts" might be more for a wikimedia survey rather than just wikipedia. Also maybe use a scaled response (always registered, usually registered, sometimes ..., rarely ..., never registered)
 * 2) "Home project" is already covered in the general survey
 * 3) The group of questions on "Why someone made their first edit" could probably be collapsed into one single question.
 * 4) Language questions should be a different surcey altogether, since this affects how someone approaches all the projects (not just WP).
 * 5) How someone first discovered wikimedia and their first project are probably better in a general survey of all wikimedians (since it can ask instead just "what was your first project?", "which project did you first edit?", "which project did you first read?")

I'm not really sure what you mean by "left to other project". --SB_Johnny | talk 12:42, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

 * Well, you are right, that I was not thinking a lot when creating this template. I have just copyed one of yourse and overpasting some data. And now answers to your points:

 * 1) Well, some users, are editing regullary and they are not register (I know this from cs), so I wanted to ask: Are you registered or not? The second part: "scalede responsee" - I should tell you that I dont know what does it mean e.g. "rarely registere"? On Wikiversity we have more accounts on Wikipedia it is not so much common, so you are right that it would be better to leave this answer for future, I would like to also know, why people on wikipedia has more accounts.
 * 2) I thout, each survey is unique. Now I see, I was wrong. But, it is possible that users, will not respond all surveys - then well be missing answers.
 * 3) well, yes.
 * 4) here would be the same reply as for no. 2
 * 5) hmmm.--Juan 20:51, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

 * I hope you don't mind, but I copied this to Template talk:Wmdgs-wikipedia-survey2 (I was relinking stuff on the Wikipedia discussion page). --SB_Johnny | talk 12:04, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Wikimedian Demographics update
Hello Juan. I'm writing because you requested a reminder about progress on Wikimedian Demographics. For the time being these will be about once per month.

Speaking of reminders, it turns out the template question isn't the most efficient way of coming up with a mailing list. If you want to recieve this message on another of your talk pages (or don't want them at all), please edit the list on Wikimedian Demographics/Reminders.

To update on progress so far, there have been somewhere around 50 respondents over the past month, with more trickling in slowly but steadily. There are 7 major surveys (or 12, depending on how you count them):
 * 1) The basic survey (about your participation in Wikimedia)
 * 2) The "geography" surveys (actually 6 of those, for each inhabited continent)
 * 3) The Operating System survey (still stubby)
 * 4) The Wikipedia survey
 * 5) The Commons survey
 * 6) The US presidential elections survey
 * 7) The sexuality and relationships survey

Only the geography surveys have had any major modifications since being originally posted (more countries were added to those).

Several new surveys have been discussed at Talk:Wikimedian Demographics, as well as other places within Wikiversity. A few that might be ready sometime in February include:
 * A survey about Women in Wikimedia
 * A survey about Wikibooks
 * A survey about Wikiversity
 * A survey about administrative issues (including cross-wiki topics such as CheckUser and "global blocking")
 * A survey about environmental issues
 * A survey about religion
 * A survey about international trade

If you have ideas for more surveys, please share them on Talk:Wikimedian Demographics. Thanks for your participation thus far, and we hope to see you soon! --SB_Johnny | talk 11:58, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

 * Oh, thanks for this. Right now, I am completly without free time.--Juan 22:47, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Czech content
ping, Erkan Yilmaz Wikiversity:Chat  21:23, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Could you have a look also here please. Lately much Czech pages here - is there an invasion :-) Erkan Yilmaz Wikiversity:Chat  18:58, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Genus cats
Why are you removing them? It helps to have those for navigating sometimes, etc. I'm thinking about adding a field for species as well in the next template version, since I'm doing a bunch of cultivars too, so that will also make it easier to keep track. --SB_Johnny | talk 14:10, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Well I thouth genus profile, doesnt fit to genus cat:(--Juan 23:14, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

 * It's really just to keep things sorted... genera in particular need to have included species linked and tracked to keep data up-to-date. See changes to BCP/Salix to see what I mean :).
 * BTW, see also Talk:Bloom Clock/Global Key. I'm switching categories on that after the cue updates, but it looks like it will show you matching up to "Early Spring" for March (it matches "Late Winter" here. More on that later :).

 * Well, OK. I can understand that.--Juan 15:29, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Featured content
"On other existing Wikiversities, I havent found something simillar to so called Featured Content."
 * on de.WV for example there is de:Wikiversity:Kandidaten für empfehlenswerte Kurse (candidates for recommendable courses) - but it is only one yet in. I guess people are not so much interested in it, Erkan Yilmaz uses the Wikiversity:Chat (try) 12:51, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, lets add in this link there, not here.--Juan 15:30, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Spanish lessons
Hi, Juan. I read some Spanish lessons and I find them very interesting, like the wikibook. If you need any help I want to help you. Ah, I was near to forgot to say it, I am Spanish. Akhram 23:15, 9 April 2008 (UTC).

 * Well, recently many people said, its a mess. So I would say that the best way, will be if the people will not write their answers on the appropriate page, but they will do i on theier subuserpage. Something like: User:name/Spanish. There are two of them. Do you have any idea, I mean your own idea how to organise the courses? --Juan 20:06, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
 * That option seems to me very good. We can use a template like, or so, which the interested users can put in their user page. With this template, the inclusion of the student in a category of control is automatic, so, their administration will be easier. Akhram 00:57, 12 April 2008 (UTC).

On the other hand, I have been looking the Spanish Language Division and it seems too quiet and a little confuse. Do you know how many people are really active (as teachers, as students)? Now, the division has a lot of secondary pages with a long lists of participants which may be outdated. I am not a foreign language teacher, so, I have no idea about the organization of courses and contents... but I can help with: Akhram 00:57, 12 April 2008 (UTC).
 * Grammar, spelling or exercises correction.
 * Resources addition (from Spain, it is very easy to find varied useful material).
 * Wiki-encoding support.
 * Clerical asistance in general.

 * Well, I would say noone is active. There were some teachers offering help, but nothing was done. Nor on the level of the courses. So its inactive. Aaaa, thank you for your support. The biggest problem I see is that I am just one interested in creating courses, but I dont have enought time to prepare hole course. Its a lot of work. So as I said somewhere, Iam thinking to make hole raw course - I mean just basics for each lesson, and then by some ways students/participants will extend it. Because it is better to have hole corse on 20 %, than have firts to lessons perfect and theny nothing. I think the design could be simmillar to this: Práce na Wikipedii. Anyway if you like, come to wikiversity-en channel I am there quite often.--Juan 21:29, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Spanish Language Division... again!
Hola de nuevo, Juan. Tras pasar unas cuantas horas revisando el material existente, ya empiezo a hacerme una idea general del proyecto y de sus necesidades. En primer lugar, me gustaría revisar la estructura del portal y organizar la estructura del directorio, las categorías y las páginas duplicadas. Por otro lado, estoy comprobando las listas de participantes para verificar quiénes siguen interesados en el proyecto y poder agruparlas todas en una única página para facilitar el trabajo. De modo que, me gustaría quedar contigo, en el Skype o en el IRC para saber qué planes tienes sobre el tema. Akhram 03:10, 13 April 2008 (UTC).

Kostival lékařský
Ahoj, šla by založit stránka pro kostival lékařský (Symphytum officinale)? Díky. --Chemgym 14:42, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

syntax error
Should be working now... not sure why it wasn't before (it used the exact same phrase as the New Region 4 field). --SB_Johnny | talk 08:40, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

New Template Version
You might have noticed that new profiles created using bcp3 now have a number of changes in the bottom template (changed on Monday, then I haven't had much time since then to get a note out). The main changes involve the fields which previously required the use of additional templates (such as bcp/white for white flowering plants). These "embedded" templates have caused a great deal of confusion among some of the new contributors.

On the new template, each of the colors has it's own field. To mark a plant as possible blooming in that color, simply put a "y" or "yes" after the equal sign (similarly for marking plants as herbaceous, etc.). Similarly for all the new fields

For the moment, "forb" should be used for any plant that has no woody parts above ground and is not a vine (e.g., BCP/Hemerocallis has a "y" for both "herbaceous =" and "forb =", while BCP/Ipomoea hederacea has a "y" for both "herbaceous = " and "vine = "). Note that annuals, grasses, sedges, etc. should also be classified as forbs or the time being.

Mike's bot will come through and update the older pages hopefully sometime in the next few days. The old fields will still work for now... several categories will allow us to keep track of which profiles use the older versions (I couldn't figure out an easy way to get the bot to redo the data, so we'll have to do that manually).

Note that the log pages are a bit different now as well, using an (updatable) template instead of text, and using headers differently to allow grouping by year. These can easily be updated by adding to the top of the page, then deleting the old text and moving the logs.--SB_Johnny | talk 09:40, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Plants in cantral europe
Hi Juan, since your regularly request plants from czech republic, i want to invite you to the project "atlas of central european plants" (de:Projekt:Atlas der Blütenpflanzen), where finding places of plants shall be collected. it is in german, but i can add an english introduction. and with the scientific names, it is international anyway. would be really great, if you could provide the places, where you took your photos, for this project. regards, -- Turnvater Jahn 15:04, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Sounds good. But my knoweledge of German is zero. So could you place there and introduction, please. Maybe I will study a little bit:-)--Juan 11:01, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

msg @ German Wikiversity
ping, Erkan Yilmaz uses the Wikiversity:Chat (try) PS: Tag a learning project with completion status !! 22:49, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Juan, did you mean "sending"?
"I though I am selling somewhere my opinion." or "I though I am sending somewhere my opinion." Robert Elliott 21:20, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

 * I dont know what you are talking about. Could you link it?--Juan 19:28, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Nominations for checkuser/Erkan_Yilmaz
Hello Juan, thanks for the feedback. Would you like to go a step further and provide some more info ? Erkan Yilmaz uses the Chat (try) 19:28, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
 * No.--Juan 21:12, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

re:old plants
Yeah, I do it all the time (especially in winter when I go through my photos from the past year). Easiest way I've found is to just alter the signature for one of your accounts (using Special:Preferences), adding both the signature of the appropriate account and the date you're logging from, make sure raw signatures is selected, and then sign using three tildes rather than four (since the date is already in the signature, and of course is not the current date). Just remember to change it again when you want to log from another account or date, and of course if you're signing on someone's talk page or something :). --SB_Johnny | talk 19:46, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Uh oh
Hi Juan. You're using an old template version for new page creates (noticed it on BCP/Nepeta cataria). The new one doesn't include the color, calendar season, type, or pollination prompts (see diff). Careful please when altering templates, since the 'bot updates won't work if they're not standard. --SB_Johnny | talk 08:25, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, I am using templates of existing othere profiles. I thought, that when you change basic templates its being changed than for other profiles.--Juan 06:09, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

answer
Hi! This is to answer your last question I hadn't noticed earlier. I don't think there is a notable difference between WV custodian and WP admin in rights or duties. The difference in naming is (according to me) to emphasize the differences between these projects (openness to original research) --Gbaor 10:46, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Why you are answering here and not there, where I asked? Anyway, have you got an idea, how custodians can emphasize openness and difference? Can you give a particular example?--Juan 06:16, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the late answer (again) :) I answered it here because of the advise of Erkan Yilmaz here. About your next question, what I meant is written also here, probably better. Change in naming of sysops (e.g. custodian not admin) should also emphasize, that something, may be forbidden in other projects (e.g. original research on WP), but allowed here at WV --Gbaor 10:58, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Czech Wikiversity
ping, Erkan Yilmaz uses the Chat (try) 17:16, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Wikiversity Day
Hi Juan. If you wish to argue about the date of Wikiversity Day, please feel welcome, and please conduct the debate where other Wikiversitarians can join in. I have created a page at Wikiversity Day/controversy which summarises your arguments as well as the counter-arguments. --McCormack 04:41, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
 * You havent understood. I am talking about "global" Wikiversity Day for all Wikiversitians (such as from Spanish Wikiversity).--Juan 18:29, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

task list
I've added a couple of items for you to take a look at. Let me know if you have any questions or need any advice. --mikeu talk 14:11, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Custodian task list
Place here some tasks for this student:
 * How to be a Wikimedia sysop
 * Category:Candidates for speedy deletion ✅
 * Category:Copy to Wikimedia Commons

IP address
Juan, please don't indefinitely block ip addresses since one may be shared by many people. Hillgentleman | //\\ |Talk 00:10, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * You mean this: 207.245.247.196? I dont know what is the problem? Maybe the template on its user page that it is a block. If someone would like to use it, he can register (look: "with an expiry time of infinite (anonymous users only, cannot edit own talk page)". Well, if you browse Google, you can find out there are multiple problems with this IP: such as e.g. this:  where it is believed it is an open proxy. So how to prevent Wikiversity against such vandalisms?--Juandev 07:34, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * So finally after some discussion on cs.wp IRC, I have reblock this IP to 3 days.--Juandev 08:10, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Open proxies are generally blocked 1 year on wm projects. --SB_Johnny talk 13:14, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Didnt know that. On cs we are blocking OP indefinite.--Juandev 13:58, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

AC
Hi juan, thanks for cleaning up my work a little, Is there a reason it still isn't showing on the main topic page? It only shows when I am logged in for some reason. Graeme E. Smith 01:10, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Now I dont understand you. What is the main topic page? What should be show there?--Juandev 08:35, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Errrr, sorry. I thought you are someone different. Let me see what is the problem:-)--Juandev 08:45, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Maybe this will help:
 * You have some problems to watch pages you are editing? - lets try this "when you are log in click on" MY PREFERENCES --> WATCHLIST --> than "Add pages I create to my watchlist" and "Add pages I edit to my watchlist" should be ticked.--Juandev 09:05, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Ok, I did that but it still doesn't change the fact that the whole page I have been editing doesn't show on the WikiVersity Artificial Consciousness Topic page. Whenever I jump to that page outside my account the page reverts back to the original page with nothing but the Welcome message. It's probably something I did wrong being a bit naive about Wiki technology, but It's confusing me because I am never sure which version of my main page is being edited. Does this make more sense?

 * I am sorry my friend not replying to you. I havent been here for couple of days as I entered a new possition of a scientist in the Agricultural Museum. Let me show you this:
 * Topic:Artificial consciousness
 * Artificial Consciousness
 * You can see, there are two pages. When there is nothing at the first one, the other one is full of your edits. That is not a problem, here you can see how I repaired that: . Does it now make sence to you. There are basicaly two pages. Nothing is automatical in Wikiversity. Hope, that we have removed your problem. --Juandev 23:54, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Oh, Sorry about not signing that message.... I keep forgetting, I seem to have access through the Wikiversity page now to my work, which might mean that it was a problem with my browser. Sorry for the confusion. Uh, I just started experimenting with sub-pages, and I have a problem that I don't know how to get around. When I anchor a subpage, it types the whole page/subpage name in my document. Is there someway to suppress the extra information in order to keep the meaning more clear? --Graeme E. Smith 01:32, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

 * Well sometimes it helps to cleare your cache. In Internet Explorer pressing CTRL+F5. For other browsers I can look up how to do that if you need. Uf in this case I dont understand you. I dont for example know, what does it mean "to anchor a subpage". If you are in wiki environment, you can "lets say" anchor the page via to ways:
 * place a link to the page (e.g. This page doesnt exist, which will give you This page doesnt exist and after typeing you will get the page which doesnt exist and it is placed at User talk:Juandev/Not existing page)
 * or you can place there a redirect (e.g. #REDIRECT User talk:Juandev/Not existing page ), but redirect works just when it is placed alone on the page and in fact it is not design to create subpages.

 * So maybe to reply you. If you would like to anchor a subpage to your document without extra information. You will placed there something like Documents which will result in: Documents. Its like: pes will result in pes:-) --Juandev 23:54, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

 * Ok, I have rebuilt my contributions a bit, using that technique and it works great! the problem I have now is that I am trying to figure out how to embed a file from wiki commons the file involved is File:Consciousness phenomenal-functional(en).png I'd like to edit it a bit, and reference it from my file but I haven't figured out how to borrow it to edit it, or how to display it once I have an edited copy.--Graeme E. Smith 04:38, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Study this: w:Wikipedia:Picture tutorial. In short. You find a picture on Commons and this results in this:  But there are also other parameters you may use, such as PX, frame, boarder and so on. Have a fun during studying.--Juan de Vojníkov 06:21, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

 * Sorry to bother you again but I am building a portal at Portal: GreySmith Institute and I want to implement 4 forums and a repository, I have been informed that I should build the repository under the CC.whatever copyright instead of GFDL. So far looking at the Research Forum and the WikiCollequium I see that they are very similar to normal wiki pages. However I have a question, how do I place the Table of Contents? None of my pages seem to have it visible, yet I haven't designated a NOTOC line except as part of the Portal template. Further, is it possible to designate under what copyright a page should be opened?--Graeme E. Smith 22:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

 * No thats fine. Those coments were mine of course. Well, in the case of the licence. If something is placed on the Wikiversity it is GFDL by default, but authors of the edits can give additional licences. And I was recomending the other licence, because I probably misunderstood, what do you want to do. But I think licence is not a problem for this time. Only what I can recomend you is tu dubble licence your contributions. It is usually done via template, like this Dual license: (or ) or simple phrase placed on your user page. Any other asociated documents could by just CC. Next time, I can explain you why, but back to your questions. To the question of the forums: yes, forums are normal wiki pages, so nothing special. They can be better (e.g. new namespace (example), new extension (example), but this needs time and people agreement). Table of Contents? Well it only works if there are sections done via = Heading 1 =, == Heading 2 ==, === Heading 3 === . So in the case of the portals you are creating it wont work. You should create it manualy probably doing it via a new template. --Juan de Vojníkov 23:26, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Ok, I'll hold off on the paper storage location for now, until I understand the license options better, I think I can play with the idea of a forum now, and see where it gets me.--Graeme E. Smith 00:04, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

 * Well, the explanation is easy. Both licenses are free. GFDL license were made deep done in 70s for some Unix documentation and when Wikipedia was launched as the first project of WMF (Wikiversity is the last) all content started to be distributed under GFDL. At that time there were no other free licenses instead of PD. PD seem to be to much open for the funding people and moreover it varies country by country, when GFDL is more uniform. Than few years after CC licences were created and people noticed that Wikimedia content would be better to have under CC licences. Why? GFDL was not design for this kind of information sharing. Major problem is that when you would like to ditribute and/or modify and distribute data formely licensed as GFDL with every copy all about 5 A4 pages should go together and also full history. Thats why we have here this kind of database history and thats why we import from other projects instead of simple copy&paste. But imagine, you are having a picture licensed under GFDL and you would like to distribute it via printed version. It is nearly imposible, because you have to attach full license and its history. Look at this cartoon:

 * But if you use CC license you can ditribute and/or modify and distribute data just with writingh down the major author(s) and linking the sourse and license itself. It doesnt matter if it is on-line or printed version. So majorly right now wikimedians are double licensing their files (which goes to Wikimedia Commons) and their contributions. The official policy of WMF is thatn to migrate from GFDL to CC. My personnal recomendation thatn would be that all separete files you will license just CC-BY-SA 3.0 and all contributions tu the project dubble licensed GFDL (you have to, as it is default license of the project) and CC-BY-SA 3.0. Any q?--Juan de Vojníkov 01:35, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

OK, let me get this straight. As an original content supplier as long as I am creating a project out of thin air, I am OK, the problem with GDFL is that it requires the whole project to be kept together, plus a HIstory, and a referral to license in any copies. CC-etc, gives creative control, which allows others to borrow my work and break it up into useful chunks, and make use of the chunks as long as the file lists the authors of the chunks, and who was first etc. So if I double license, I can expect my picture of Abe Lincoln to show up with a mustache? But at least it will list that I wasn't the person who added the mustache?--Graeme E. Smith 15:49, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

 * Yes those are free/open licenses (GFDL, CC, PD). It doesnt matter which you choose all allow other people to modify your work (so e.g. to add a mustache to your Ave Lincoln picture). Well of course, for they pictures usually say: Abe Lincoln mustage.jpg (Author Pete Grant), compilation from abe lincoln.jpg (original author Graeme E. Smith). Look:
 * CC (and some examples: )
 * GFDL (examples: )
 * PD (and some examples:, , )

 * When you double license, people may choose under which conditions they will use the imagine. Thats why projects in general has one license. When more licenses for the project, this situation make a big chaos. Here is a nice example of the modification: . Within the Wikimedia community, you cant be afraid that someone would break the rules. Sometimes also Wikimedians call to other world not to break rules using data from projects.--Juan de Vojníkov 19:44, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Ok, I have some Forums implemented now, Take a look GreySmith Institute I decided to implement them under CC-By-SA 3.0 so that they can be used outside the Institute. Essentially by posting on them you agree that the content is licensed under CC rules. I used the long form for the names, but "Nicknamed" them inside the forum so AC Forum becomes Articial Consciousness Forum etc. (just so it doesn't get mixed up with AC current)--Graeme E. Smith 21:03, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

 * Well, I have just spoke to one license specialist nad he told me, that you can exclude some page from the official license of the project. So your forums now will be doublelicensed. Licenses are not fun. If you will be interested in more details about this, I can arrange a meeting with him on IRC channel.--Juan de Vojníkov 22:31, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Better hold off on that, until I load an IRC client, I haven't installed one since I was forced to upgrade in order to connect to my highspeed-light modem. I'll log off. Load one and get back to you once I know it works.--Graeme E. Smith 22:42, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

OK, I have an evaluation copy of an IRC client running in the background let me know what channel to join, and who to ask for--Graeme E. Smith 23:05, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

 * OK, we are on freenode.net and you can reach both channels, it means #wikiversity and #wikiversity-en . Sorry for delay, I am replying some questions to JWS:-) --Juan de Vojníkov 23:16, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

My IRC client logged me onto Quake.net and I am not getting a response, I logged on as GreyBeard for this session only.

 * Are you skilled in IRC? You should change from quake.net to freenode.net.--Juan de Vojníkov 23:54, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

So, as I understand it Moulton, like me, comes from a dynamic connection? I keep getting welcomed when I forget to log on. It's nothing I have any control over its the router at the phone compuany, that resets my IP address constantly, It's supposed to reduce the chance of hacking my account, by constantly changing the ip address around. I don't know how effective it is, but most routers have the capability to reset IP addresses periodically. It's part of DHCP I think.

Did you think I was Moulton for some reason?

Are you sure I am not now, and that is why you don't drop by as often? I've begun to think I have bad breath or something.--Graeme E. Smith 00:46, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

 * Uh, I think this is a time zone issue... I don't think Juan thinks that :-). --SB_Johnny talk 00:58, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

 * Errr, I dont know, why you think so. I dont think you are Moulton. Of course, it happens that people forgot to log in and then they are editing from different IP adresess. Thats not a problem. By the way, I dont understand why SB Johnny is talking about different time zone, but yes. You guys in US could be UTC -5, -6, -7, -8, but I am UTC +1. So this is from 6 up 9 hour difference. It means when theres a night in US I have a day and vice versa.--Juan de Vojníkov 09:03, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Ok, Now I have a problem, I just put a short page into the standard namespace describing GreySmith Institute, and someone slapped a category redirect template on it somehow. It claims that Artificial Consciousness is a Computer Science topic, and while some of the pages are listed in the Computing Science category, There are enough pages that fall outside the category for me to be a bit miffed. I think that someone is toying with me. Especially since the redirect template is supposed to be used only in a category directory and GreySmith Institute, as far as I know is not a category yet.--Graeme E. Smith 03:05, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

 * Heh, I dont see nothing like this. Ask in Colloquium, that is the place for questions.--Juan de Vojníkov 09:03, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Ok, I think I figured it out, they put the redirect on GreySmith Institute itself and I used the wrong type of link on the page, so it showed on the page, instead of just in the category system. Im getting too used to having to write curly brackets I guess.--Graeme E. Smith 14:50, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

 * Yes. This is a template (template page is in ns Templage: and it can have severla functions).--Juan de Vojníkov 18:54, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Juan, sorry to bother you again, but is there any way to export the TOC to a separate file? or to suppress the text, and just show the TOC until someone selects a link to a specific range? Where would I look to find out?--Graeme E. Smith 14:45, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

recommendation for full custodianship
I have opened a nomination for full custodianship. This begins the five day request for the community to comment. --mikeu talk 11:43, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
 * aaa, thx.--Juan de Vojníkov 13:45, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Category Question
I can't find documentation about categories. I tried to add some categories and one I wanted to add was "Ancient Egypt". The automated message I received suggested looking at (among others) the wikipedia category. Does this mean that we can file wikiversity pages under wikipedia categories? Or does the suggestion mean that a category should be set up along similar lines? Any help/suggestion would be appreciated. I have been working on the Ancient Egyptian Monuments Project in case you wanted to know in what setting the question came up. Barta 18:18, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, it means, that categories here can have a simmillar system as on Wikipedia.--Juan de Vojníkov 18:57, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Congratulations!
Hi Juan, and congratulations about being a full custodian! I'm very happy for you. --AFriedman 15:34, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Mentors
Hi Juan,

I think Wikiversity needs much better resources for recognizing and coordinating mentorship, e.g. research and content development mentorship for User:Graeme E. Smith and course mentorship for User:AdaptiveCampus. I'm trying to fix that by taking the Mentors program to the next level. Perhaps if good mentorship is recognized, it's more likely to be provided. I've seen you do some very good mentoring, and would appreciate your feedback on the new version of the program. --AFriedman 17:53, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Course mentorship could be a difficult issue as we are still harvesting the ways how to do it. But let me see.--Juan de Vojníkov 00:06, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Hi Juan, Have you gotten around to looking at the mentorship page yet? I've also been communicating with User:Graeme E. Smith about how to provide better automated feedback in courses, and he's been revising the Fundamentals of Neuroscience/Electrical Currents lesson just to let you know, and in case you want to look at that for ideas. --AFriedman 00:11, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes I have seen that page. But this time I dont have so much time free as writing my diploma thesis.--Juan de Vojníkov 19:35, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Bounce from Wikibooks
I tried to start a book on Wikibooks, but as some know, they are prejudiced against original research or anything that smacks of it, so they are banning my book. They suggested transwiki-ing it back here and publishing it from here. Any idea how this works? And can you suggest where to find the documentation on publishing from here?--Graeme E. Smith 20:56, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, yeah. Most of the project doesnt allowed original research. Just the Wikiversity do. But it is logic that all books on wikibooks have some ammount of original research. Well, I suggest to write a book in here and then we will see. It can stay here and if someone else need he will call it via v:Book name, when "v" is a Wikiversity prefix how to call pages from Wikiversity. Then when the book will be ready in here, we may transport it to Wikibooks, if they will agree, we can change it to a different format and allow it from Wikimedia Commons or it might stay in here. There is no problem on wv with original research:-)

Nice to hear, that you are still on. I am in preparation for state exams this time, so not having much time to come here.--Juan de Vojníkov 01:29, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Design/Tigey
Good evening! I thought I would submit my User page design for your consideration. You can find it at User:Juan de Vojníkov/Design Tigey. I added a note to the bottom with a link to wikEd, an editing tool for Wiki sites that eases viewing the markup. I removed a couple of subpages that I have on my own page for the design since one I have not yet implemented and the other would require a bit of work to port over (the travel template). Let me know if you like it. Tigey 02:16, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Wow nice. What about to change colors?--Juan de Vojníkov 04:45, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

 * Changing colors is pretty easy. If you have wikEd, it highlights colors specifications in the wikitext using the color specified so if you have color=ff0000 that text would be highlighted red in the edit window.  All of the colors in that design are either named colors (i.e. red) or in RGB format (i.e. ff0000 which equals red).  If you would like I can redo the color scheme to the colors you ask for.  Tigey 04:54, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

 * Heh, should try than that.--Juan de Vojníkov 08:28, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

sandbox server
Since the sandboxserver.org went offline I've been discussing a new server with darkcode and SB_Johnny. We're probably going to go ahead and create a limited version soon. BTW, why are you banned from freenode services? --mikeu talk 14:50, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Thats a long story.--Juan de Vojníkov 19:17, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Jimbo's talk page
Hi Juan! I have seen your entry on Jimbo's talk page. I know that the situation is not easy for anybody here, but I would like to ask you to cool down. Threats with blocking just don't lead anywhere, and I am pretty sure it would make the whole thing a lot worse. --Gbaor 08:17, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
 * That is not a threat. That is my notice, which I normally use, when someone is violating the project.--Juan de Vojníkov 21:29, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Mr Wales isn't someone. I would like to have that you resign your administrative powers until the dispute is solved. --Histo 22:17, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

 * Yes, Mr. Wales is a Wikimedian as us. I can agree with founder flag (as I have seen it for the first time), but I disagree with the way it was used. It is disrupting the community and I was elected to protect it. Mr. Wales and/or WMF could use a better way to inform us, that they disagree with the content and practices hosted on the project.--Juan de Vojníkov 22:36, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Hello!
Hello! Juan de Vojinikov and welcome to Wikiversity, need help, don`t go to the famous Sandbox

User:Geoff Plourde probationary custodianship
Thanks for mentoring - Geoff is now a probationary custodian. -- Jtneill - Talk - c 07:31, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
 * OK. Thx!--Juan de Vojníkov 08:45, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Would you please add yourself to List of custodian mentors? -- Jtneill - Talk - c 11:01, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Done.--Juan de Vojníkov 11:39, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Category
Hi! Thank you for your message. You can put category. Because ı have much a works today... Thanks... --Bermanya 20:23, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

New tests
My Name is Yellow and Should be Juan.? What are you testing? –SJ + > 02:39, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi, as I commented here: User talk:Geoff Plourde/mentoring 2010, I am testing if triple and multiple redirects will be displayed in special:DoubleRedirects and if well have a tool to find them. The same with cyclic redirects. When the experiment will end, these pages will be deleted.--Juan de Vojníkov 04:17, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Activity
Juan,

I'm still around. A majority of my time has been consumed by college, so I'm not as active as I was during the summer.

Geoff

Are you recommending?
Heya Juan,

Noticed this this morning... are you going to add a recommendation? He's actually a bit overdue(!), but you need to actually make a recommendation (pro or con) to start the discussion period. --SB_Johnny talk 19:53, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Well I dont know. I spoke with him to ask him to find another custodian, but he seems not to have time. And he was not acitive enough I can recomend/not recomend him.--Juan de Vojníkov 12:54, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Good luck for your presentation
Hi Juan - I hope your Wikiversity presentation goes really well - and maybe you some new contributors will be inspired! . Maybe it can be recorded? Sincerely, James. 08:36, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

PLE feedback
Hi Juan, since you were involved from begin here in regards to PLE's would you mind sharing your experiences? Thanks, Erkan Yilmaz uses the Chat + Identi.ca 05:16, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Deleted Content - Unable to log in Account
Hey I was writing my wikipistoarticle yesterday and clicked the "Save"Button when something really bad happend. I dont know why but the system showed me an error and logged me out. I tried to log in with password. I failed. I thought that I might have forgotten it and send this "remember" mail. Got it and entered the one from the mail and then was asked to set up a new one. Tried it but it didnt worked at all. Im still unable to log in - no matter how hard i try. My whole writings our wikiversity page seems to been gone which really upsets me. I tried it again today. One time the system told me that I cant get a remembermail because I have not registered with mailadress, the next time it works and I get a mail with a password - but this doesnt work either. What can I do? Im quite desperate because the workload of a month might be gone. Please help me.

My username was "Wintertagtraum" my address is "nora.steinbach@edu.uni-graz.at"

Thank you in advance 130.232.214.10 (discuss) 07:10, 15 March 2013 (UTC)Wintertagtraum

Custodian mentoring
Hello Juan, can you please mentor me for custodianship. Thank you! --Draubb (discuss • contribs) 19:30, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Account renamed
Hi Juandev. In case you missed it, see [//en.wikiversity.org/w/index.php?title=Wikiversity:Changing_username&diff=1234930&oldid=1234847 here]. Trijnstel (discuss • contribs) 14:04, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

 * Great. That is what I was waiting for.--Juandev (discuss • contribs) 03:57, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Juan. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Juan~enwikiversity that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:40, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Thank you
Thanks for the "welcome back" message. --JWSchmidt (discuss • contribs) 01:08, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

 * Well, I am happy to se you around again.--Juandev (discuss • contribs) 10:01, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Draft namespace
Hi Juandev!

Welcome back!

If you like, you can record an opinion and vote on the Draft namespace. The discussion is here. --Marshallsumter (discuss • contribs) 19:47, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

 * I thought it have ended and well, I am not sure. But, lets write there my opi.--Juandev (discuss • contribs) 20:15, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

How we will see unregistered users
Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:14, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Activity Review
Wikiversity has adopted a policy that expects users with administrative rights to be active participants and to regularly use those rights (at least five edits and five actions within the last 12 months). It appears that you are no longer active at Wikiversity and do not currently have a need for administrative rights.

If you would prefer to retain your administrative role, please rejoin us with your contributions and support. If your account remains inactive, we will need to request that stewards remove your administrative rights. Let me know if you have any questions, and thank you for your previous efforts on our behalf.

Dave Braunschweig (discuss • contribs) 13:54, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

 * OK. Juandev (discuss • contribs) 23:03, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

User:Juandev/LDW24/wd
With respect to your request at the Colloquium (special:diff/2604641), I have set semi-protection to the user subpage which was included in your request. If you have any other userpages that may need semi-protection, please let me know (If my response was late, then you can also use WV:RCA for protection requests). MathXplore (discuss • contribs) 09:56, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

 * Oh, thank you. Juandev (discuss • contribs) 10:01, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

title: User talk:Juandev


text:
User talk:Susi~enwikiversity

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Susi. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Susi~enwikiversity that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 00:04, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:23, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Susi~enwikiversity


text:
User talk:Danshelb~enwikiversity

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Danshelb. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Danshelb~enwikiversity that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:33, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:05, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Danshelb~enwikiversity


text: User talk:مترجم05

title: User talk:مترجم05


text: User talk:Steve block

title: User talk:Steve block


text:
User talk:NewBeginning

French Mentoring
Salut, NewBeginning. You are listed at the French stream as being an intermediate student of French who is interested in learning French. The French Mentoring project has recently been launched, and if you add your name to that list, I will do my best to put you in contact with an appropriate Mentor who would be glad to help you. The Jade Knight (d'viser) 07:49, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

title: User talk:NewBeginning


text:
User talk:Cwikman

Image copyright problem with Image:Cw24.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Cw24.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikiversity because of copyright law (see Wikiversity' Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikibooks are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information or giving false information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at Colloquim. Thank you. – Mike.lifeguard | talk 23:33, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problems

 * This is the image in question. Please provide a license template and source for it. Thanks. – Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 21:55, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

title: User talk:Cwikman


text:
User talk:Ptbennett~enwikiversity

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Ptbennett. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Ptbennett~enwikiversity that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:48, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:18, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ptbennett~enwikiversity


text: User:Riana dzasta

title: User:Riana dzasta


text: User talk:Dante

title: User talk:Dante


text: User talk:Yakoo

title: User talk:Yakoo


text: User talk:HMcKibben

title: User talk:HMcKibben


text: User talk:Pyroprogrammer

title: User talk:Pyroprogrammer


text:
User talk:WindRunner~enwikiversity

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called WindRunner. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name WindRunner~enwikiversity that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:48, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:25, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:WindRunner~enwikiversity


text:
User talk:Prinzwilhelm~enwikiversity

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Prinzwilhelm. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Prinzwilhelm~enwikiversity that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:48, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:18, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Prinzwilhelm~enwikiversity


text:
User talk:Vreemdekikker

Image:Vreemdekikker.jpg
Please provide a license template and source for this image. Thanks. – Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 23:01, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Please also see Requests_for_Deletion, Erkan Yilmaz uses the Chat (try) 20:50, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

title: User talk:Vreemdekikker


text: User talk:Martin Kozák

title: User talk:Martin Kozák


text: User talk:Boryana

title: User talk:Boryana


text: User talk:ProfessorDan

title: User talk:ProfessorDan