text:
User talk:Beetlebaum

 Hello Beetlebaum, and welcome to Wikiversity! If you need help, feel free to visit my talk page, or contact us and ask questions. After you leave a comment on a talk page, remember to sign and date; it helps everyone follow the threads of the discussion. The signature icon in the edit window makes it simple. To get started, you may

 * Take a guided tour and learn to edit.
 * Visit a (kind of) random project.
 * Browse Wikiversity, or visit a portal corresponding to your educational level: pre-school, primary, secondary, tertiary, non-formal education.
 * Find out about research activities on Wikiversity.

 * Read an introduction for teachers and find out how to write an educational resource for Wikiversity.
 * Give feedback about your initial observations
 * Discuss Wikiversity issues or ask questions at the colloquium.
 * Chat with other Wikiversitans on #wikiversity-en.

And don't forget to explore Wikiversity with the links to your left. Be bold to contribute and to experiment with the sandbox or your userpage, and see you around Wikiversity! If you're a twitter user, please follow http://twitter.com/Wikiversity. --JWSchmidt 19:50, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. --the winner..... Beetlebaum 23:12, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
 * You must learn not to respond to welcomes it bothers the great spirit of wiki. --JWSchmidt 23:21, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Unblocked
Diego Grez unblocked this account with the summary "Reasons suck." While a bit terse, that's an accurate summary. There was no sufficient reason alleged to block this account as an acknowledged sock. Wikiversity users are free to use acknowledged socks non-abusively, in the absence of a contrary policy, and if a sock should happen to be used abusively, the master account would be equally sanctionable. I noticed the "conversation" between Beetlebaum and JWS on this Talk page, after JWS "welcomed" Beetlebaum, which wasn't proper, since at that time the sock account had not been acknowledged, but this, if anything, could have been cause to block both accounts, not just one, and was minor, given that there was no other abusive socking.

Blocking Beetlebaum was an unnecessary restriction of the freedom of JWS. There was no block notice on the Talk page, which would normally exist so that a custodian reviewing an unblock request would have it handy. This was compounded by Adambro denying the unblock request himself, which was utterly improper. Unblock requests should always be reviewed by a second custodian; if no second custodian is available, the unblock request should remain until one finally appears. --Abd 02:34, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

 * "acknowledged socks" <-- Wikiversity community members can create and use alternative accounts. JWS "welcomed" Beetlebaum, which wasn't proper <-- Why can't I welcome myself? The Beetlebaum account is harmless and should never have attracted the attention of any Custodian, but one misguided sysop violated the privacy of this harmless Wikiversity user account by misusing checkuser data and going out of his way to link the account name to its IP address. --the winner..... Beetlebaum 03:08, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

 * Beetlebaum, you should not "welcome yourself" because it could look like you are setting up conditions for abusive sock usage, trying to make it look like there are really two separate people. Perhaps you are not aware of how socks can be used abusively. I'm not at all claiming that you used this account abusively, the "welcoming" exercise above was actually harmless, as far as I've seen. You might try to understand, however, why Adambro made the checkuser request. Once he knew, he shared what he knew. Very strange, you are making a great fuss about this possible slip by Adambro, revealing information that was public record on meta, and that you acknowledged, while at the same time you defend Moulton for using the real name of a Wikiversity user when he clearly knew that this was offensive to the user. I find your behavior highly imbalanced and disruptive. I supported this unblock, but you seem to only be looking for stuff to argue with. Please stop. --Abd 03:59, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
 * "it could look like you are setting up conditions for abusive sock usage" <-- Only to people who fail to Assume Good Faith. "trying to make it look like there are really two separate people" <-- The Beetlebaum account has participated in no votes, the purpose of the account was clearly stated on the user page as being to allow development of the Wikiversity learning project on Music and learning. "You might try to understand, however, why Adambro made the checkuser request" <-- I have tried. He has gone out of his way to disrupt Wikiversity by enforcing an absurdly bad block against Moulton's participation at Wikiversity. I've asked him repeatedly why he persists in disrupting Wikiversity in this way and Adambro has never given reasonable justification for his harassment of Moulton and his disruption of my learning goals and right to collaborate with Moulton at Wikiversity. "Once he knew, he shared what he knew." <-- This is an understatement. Adambro went out of his way to reveal the IP address of this harmless user account. He has never explained why he did that. "revealing information that was public record on meta" <-- The association between this user account and its IP address was something that Adambro could not have made without checkuser data and he needlessly made public that association, violating the privacy of a harmless Wikiversity user account. That association was made by Adambro by misusing checkuser data and then revealed publicly by Adambro, and not by anyone at Meta. "making a great fuss" <-- Violation of the letter or spirit of the Wikimedia privacy policy is a serious matter. "you defend Moulton for using the real name of a Wikiversity user when he clearly knew that this was offensive to the user" <-- Wikiversity community members (including you) have used the real names of their collaborators during the entire existence of the Wikiversity project. "offensive to the user" <-- I doubt if anyone has been offended by the use of their name at Wikiversity. There is no rule against using names at Wikiversity. Abd, please list one person who was harmed by mention of their name at Wikiversity. "he clearly knew that this was offensive" <-- Abd, please unblock Moulton and let him defend himself against your claims. "you seem to only be looking for stuff to argue with. Please stop" <-- The purpose of this account is described on this page. Adambro went out of his way to stalk and harass this harmless Wikiversity user account. I am looking to defend the Wikiversity community against misguided Wikimedia functionaries. --the winner..... Beetlebaum 09:13, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

title: User talk:Beetlebaum


text:
User:MikeWagner

Student of C++.

Credited on a small number of games for writing, design, localization.

Once I'm comfortable in C++, I'll focus on getting my art skills up so I can do design, programming, and art myself if need be.

Current home base: Prince Edward Island, Canada

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: User:MikeWagner


text:
User talk:MikeWagner

 Hello MikeWagner, and welcome to Wikiversity! If you need help, feel free to visit my talk page, or contact us and ask questions. After you leave a comment on a talk page, remember to sign and date; it helps everyone follow the threads of the discussion. The signature icon in the edit window makes it simple. To get started, you may

 * Take a guided tour and learn to edit.
 * Visit a (kind of) random project.
 * Browse Wikiversity, or visit a portal corresponding to your educational level: pre-school, primary, secondary, tertiary, non-formal education.
 * Find out about research activities on Wikiversity.

 * Read an introduction for teachers and find out how to write an educational resource for Wikiversity.
 * Give feedback about your initial observations
 * Discuss Wikiversity issues or ask questions at the colloquium.
 * Chat with other Wikiversitans on #wikiversity-en.

And don't forget to explore Wikiversity with the links to your left. Be bold to contribute and to experiment with the sandbox or your userpage, and see you around Wikiversity! If you're a twitter user, please follow http://twitter.com/Wikiversity. --JWSchmidt 20:24, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

title: User talk:MikeWagner


text: User:Microprocessor Man

title: User:Microprocessor Man


text:
User talk:E.herbert

 Hello E.herbert, and welcome to Wikiversity! If you need help, feel free to visit my talk page, or contact us and ask questions. After you leave a comment on a talk page, remember to sign and date; it helps everyone follow the threads of the discussion. The signature icon in the edit window makes it simple. To get started, you may

 * Take a guided tour and learn to edit.
 * Visit a (kind of) random project.
 * Browse Wikiversity, or visit a portal corresponding to your educational level: pre-school, primary, secondary, tertiary, non-formal education.
 * Find out about research activities on Wikiversity.

 * Read an introduction for teachers and find out how to write an educational resource for Wikiversity.
 * Give feedback about your initial observations
 * Discuss Wikiversity issues or ask questions at the colloquium.
 * Chat with other Wikiversitans on #wikiversity-en.

And don't forget to explore Wikiversity with the links to your left. Be bold to contribute and to experiment with the sandbox or your userpage, and see you around Wikiversity! If you're a twitter user, please follow http://twitter.com/Wikiversity. Jtneill - Talk - c 03:17, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

 Hello , we are the Baah and Bahh twins and we'd both like to welcome you to Wikiversity. While you sit back and explore Wikiversity, enjoy some of our fresh goat milk. You can help us learn by creating new learning resources or help us by improving the guided tours and other exploration tools. We look forward to seeing you around. Baaaahbye for now.

Welcome to Motivation and emotion
Welcome and congratulations on being the first M&E student to sign up on Wikiversity! -- Jtneill - Talk - c 03:17, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Hey, just wanted to say I really like your picture on the main page, gotta figure out how to get a picture on mine after seeing yours! 121.127.203.86 22:03, 16 September 2010 (UTC) Cheers Mylie From M&E unit

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 00:18, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

title: User talk:E.herbert


title: File:Grfig4.JPG


text:
User talk:Kratoz~enwikiversity

 Hello Kratoz, and welcome to Wikiversity! If you need help, feel free to visit my talk page, or contact us and ask questions. After you leave a comment on a talk page, remember to sign and date; it helps everyone follow the threads of the discussion. The signature icon in the edit window makes it simple. To get started, you may

 * Take a guided tour and learn to edit.
 * Visit a (kind of) random project.
 * Browse Wikiversity, or visit a portal corresponding to your educational level: pre-school, primary, secondary, tertiary, non-formal education.
 * Find out about research activities on Wikiversity.

 * Read an introduction for teachers and find out how to write an educational resource for Wikiversity.
 * Give feedback about your initial observations
 * Discuss Wikiversity issues or ask questions at the colloquium.
 * Chat with other Wikiversitans on #wikiversity-en.

And don't forget to explore Wikiversity with the links to your left. Be bold to contribute and to experiment with the sandbox or your userpage, and see you around Wikiversity! If you're a twitter user, please follow http://twitter.com/Wikiversity. --Mu301Bot 07:17, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or need help. --mikeu talk 07:17, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Kratoz. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Kratoz~enwikiversity that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:41, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:13, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kratoz~enwikiversity


text:
User:Romperlevis~enwikiversity

Business English Training Materials
The following are exercises for training students in Business English. The exercises are in the form of examinations with which the students can practice their language skills (reading and listening) as well as improving language knowledge (grammar and vocabulary).

title: User:Romperlevis~enwikiversity


text:
User talk:EdoDodo

bot inactivity
Hello, we've noticed that the bot that you operate has been inactive since 2010. The bot flag has been temporarily removed for inactivity per changes in the Bots policy. The flag will restored if we notice that the bot has resumed productive activity, or if you request restoration from a bureaucrat. The community does not consider it a big deal to re-grant this right to a trusted contributor. Thank you for the bot contributions that you have made in the past, and we hope that you will consider becoming active again. --mikeu talk 02:47, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

title: User talk:EdoDodo


text:
User:EdoDodo

  EdoDodo  talk • about • email • interwiki    Userpage design adapted fromSonia.

title: User:EdoDodo


text:
Human Legacy Course/Quiz 8

{Please tell if this statement is true or false. If it is false, explain why: The Nile River and the Sahara Desert were important natural barriers that kept the Egyptian people safe from invaders. -False; The Nile River and the Red Sea were important natural barriers that kept the Egyptian people safe from invaders. -False; The Nile River and the Sahara Desert didn't protect against invaders whatsoever. +True -None of the Above
 * type=""}

{Please tell if this statement is true or false. If it is false, explain why: Around 3100 BC Egypt was divided into two separate kingdoms by a ruler named Menes. +False; The kingdom was unified, not divided, at that time. -False; Around 3100 BC Egypt was divided into two separate kingdoms by a ruler named Hatshepsut. -True -False; Around 3100 BC Egypt was unified into two separate kingdoms by a ruler named Ramses the Great.
 * type=""}

{Please tell if this statement is true or false. If it is false, explain why: The pyramids were built as temples to the Egyptian gods so all Egyptians could worship together. -True +False; The pyramids were built as tombs for Egypt’s rulers. -False; The pyramids were built as temples to the Egyptian rulers so all upper classes could worship them. -None of the Above
 * type=""}

{Please tell if this statement is true or false. If it is false, explain why: As head of the Egyptian government, the pharaoh owned all the land and acted as a judge and as leader of the army. -False; As head of the Egyptian government, the pharaoh owned some of the land and acted as a judge and as leader of the army. -False; As head of the Egyptian government, the vizier owned all the land and acted as a judge and as leader of the army. -False; As head of the Upper Egyptian government, the pharaoh owned none of the land and acted as a judge and as leader of the army. +True
 * type=""}

{Please tell if this statement is true or false. If it is false, explain why: Conflict with the Sea Peoples and power struggles among priests and nobles helped to set the stage for Egypt’s decline. -False; Conflict with the Assyrians and power struggles among viziers and nobles helped to set the stage for Egypt's decline. +True -False; Peace with the Sea Peoples and power rulings among priests and nobles helped to set the stage for Egypt’s prosperity. -None of the Above
 * type=""}

title: Human Legacy Course/Quiz 8


text:
User talk:Chin~enwikiversity

 Hello Chin, and welcome to Wikiversity! If you need help, feel free to visit my talk page, or contact us and ask questions. After you leave a comment on a talk page, remember to sign and date; it helps everyone follow the threads of the discussion. The signature icon in the edit window makes it simple. To get started, you may

 * Take a guided tour and learn to edit.
 * Visit a (kind of) random project.
 * Browse Wikiversity, or visit a portal corresponding to your educational level: pre-school, primary, secondary, tertiary, non-formal education.
 * Find out about research activities on Wikiversity.

 * Read an introduction for teachers and find out how to write an educational resource for Wikiversity.
 * Give feedback about your initial observations
 * Discuss Wikiversity issues or ask questions at the colloquium.
 * Chat with other Wikiversitans on #wikiversity-en.

And don't forget to explore Wikiversity with the links to your left. Be bold to contribute and to experiment with the sandbox or your userpage, and see you around Wikiversity! If you're a twitter user, please follow http://twitter.com/Wikiversity. --Ottava Rima (talk) 19:18, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

what happened?
Mokada une? Why u r not visiting to Sinhala wiki? We r waiting for you. බිඟුවා 14:43, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Chin. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Chin~enwikiversity that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:29, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:04, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Portal:Azerbaijani Language
We appreciate your effort to contribute to Wikiversity. This work appears to be a copy of https://books.google.ru/books?id=WoADDAAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y. If you have permission or can get permission from the copyright owner soon to release the work freely under CC-BY-SA 3.0, please comment to that effect at, and we may be able to accept the work. Otherwise you may need to consider rewriting the content in your own words. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me on my talk page or the Wikiversity community at the Colloquium. Thank you. Andrew Krizhanovsky (discuss • contribs) 06:40, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

title: User talk:Chin~enwikiversity


text:
User:Cdpr114

This page introduces the students of cdpr114 to Wikiversity and the possibilities of collaborative Wiki editing.

Our objective is to develop definitions for several terms that relate to Reputation Management for Public Relations.

Each term will have its own page and students will contribute to refining the definitions and providing examples in ways that develop the terms clearly for other practitioners.

Creativity, images, diagrams may all contribute to definitions. It is best to end with a concise and crystal clear finished product. If you have nothing to add that will improve the term's definition, simply add your stamp of approval until all terms are fully approved.

Any images or diagrams must be fully copyright available according to the terms of the Creative Commons (a link can be found on most Wiki pages that describes terms).

I look forward to seeing your work in progress and fully finished.

Best, Boyd Neil 20:03, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

title: User:Cdpr114


text:
User talk:Cdpr114

Public Company
A Public Company is...

Equity and Debt
Equity and Debt are...

Buy-side and Sell-side Analysts
Buy-side and Sell-side Analysts are...

IPO
IPO means...

Initial Public Offering. The first sale of stock by a company to the public. Companies offering an IPO are sometimes new, young companies, or sometimes companies which have been around for many years but are finally deciding to go public. IPOs are often risky [investments], but often have the potential for significant gains. IPOs are often used as a way for a young company to gain necessary market capital.

M & A
M & A means...

Private Equity Firms
Private Equity Firms are...

Shareholder Activism
Shareholder Activism refers to...

When you own stock in a company, you are truly a company owner, and the management should be working on your behalf. As such, you enjoy certain rights and privileges, such as the right to:

 * Receive a response when you write the company
 * Secure a meeting with corporate managers to raise your concerns
 * Attend annual shareholder meetings and pose questions directly to a company's CEO
 * Obtain media coverage of the company and the issue
 * Secure a meeting with corporate managers to raise your concerns

--141.117.217.70 20:31, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Proxy and Proxy Solicitation
Proxy and Proxy Solicitation refer to...

Materiality
Materiality means...

Disclosure
Disclosure means...

MD&A (Management Disclosure and Analysis)
MD&A, Management Disclosure and Analysis refers to...

Reporting Tools & Techniques
Reporting Tools and Techniques (e.g. AR, quarterlies, analyst calls, investor days) are...

title: User talk:Cdpr114


text:
Portal:Azerbaijani Language

Key figures

 * Jabbar Manaf oglu Mammadov. (Prof.) - Founder of the school
 * Mamedov Museib (Prof.)
 * Kazimov Gazanfar (Prof.)
 * Akhundov Agamusa (Prof.)
 * Jafarov Nizami (Prof.)
 * Mirzoev Ghassan (Prof.)
 * Abbasov Ali (Prof.)

Key Features
Allocate content and expressive plan in language. The content plan of language is considered a static, unchanging over time, that is located outside the continuum of space and time, out of diachronic and synchronic, the same for all, that is common to all mankind, invariant, that is not dependent on national and gender differences, related to the structure thinking of mankind, potentially existing in the minds of every individual. National languages were formed from this common root, each in its own deciding some grammatical, morphological, lexical problems of expression (on an unconscious level). Depending on the history, geography, life, needs, etc., of every nation, in terms of expression revealed the different parts of a content plan for each national language of the more developed its separate parts.

Expressive is often seen as just a shell of a content plan, the projection patterns of brain activity in the social sphere. And not the language itself but the very part of it is developing and changing completely. Despite the fact that the language of deterministic scheme of thinking of the brain, its manifestation of that is expressive plan, subject to strong influence of social factors and is regulated by them: over time, the language flows (pepper) all of the history, philosophy, life, traditions, and so on. people-carrier, adding to the skeleton of many strokes and, thus, forming individual national languages and to obtain such a range of world languages, and each of them possesses its own unique morphology. Content same plan language for all this remains the same among all the peoples of the world.

 The syntax is not reckoned in the traditional sense , when it is defined as an area of grammar studying the sentence, followed by a number of linguists XIX-XX centuries - as part of grammar which studies a substantial level of language, and contrasting morphology and phonetics, studying expressive plan language.

 Shares the parts of speech to:  syntactic and non-syntactic. The first group includes the independent ones, and the second - all other parts of speech. After that, excludes a number of independent parts of speech, pronouns and adverbs, based on the following considerations:

 *  Pronoun independence is denied , believing that relations between pronouns with other parts of speech are not equal and mutually exclusive, since the properties of pronouns overlap with other parts of speech, as their subset. But this contradicts the second law "the division of logic" (which reads: "Members of the division should be mutually exclusive, which means that they should not overlap"). The division of all the major parts of speech, first in general and particular, and then to abstract the specific types shows that the place of abstract general form of each part of speech is empty. The conclusion is that both times, it is the pronoun which science traditionally (by historical inertia or under the influence of authority of the ancient schools) separated from the other parts of speech, together in one class, calling it a pronoun. Based on this logic, the school sees fit to distribute it on other parts of speech.

 *  The adverb, however, is considered just a derivative , rather adverbizing version of the other parts of speech. More precisely, it is considered that it comes out of other parts of speech, when speaking them as a means of expressing status. In this case, they are automatically transformed into an adverb. Therefore it is considered it appropriate to replace it adverbizing options other parts of speech.

In total, for the independent (main)  4 parts of speech  takes part only: noun, adjective, numeral, and verb.

 Opposed to isolating members of the sentences from the parts of speech:  I believe that there are no isolated, out of touch with each other parts of speech and of the sentence - the four parts of speech serve only as a means of expression of the sentence and the sentence are expressed only in parts of speech.

 Conversion:  Consider conversion is not an act inter-operational parts of speech, and performance of them as a means of expression of members of the sentences.

Methodology
In analyzing the language of the school uses the tools of the following areas of knowledge: And the philosopher and linguist observe the same objects. But each of them calls them in his own way.
 * From Psychology — it takes "Functional asymmetry of the hemispheres of the brain";
 * From Logic — it takes the laws of division;
 * From Philosophy — it takes the fact that the actions that the school had four main parts of speech are the linguistic equivalent of an ontology of categories, such as:
 * 1) matter = noun,
 * 2) movement = verb,
 * 3) movement = adjective,
 * 4) number = numeral.

The main contribution (significance)
As a result of these and other tests some content level of language system come forth (see diagram: )

As it is known, the main goal of structural linguistics and all its sub -school was to find the system of language. Some experts believe that the resulting system is exactly the one that searched for and are looking to this day structuring and members of other linguistic and philosophical schools or, at least some part of the system. It is believed that this system - such as the "Periodic Table" for linguistics

Approach to "structural linguistics"
In contrast to the classical structural linguistics, this school does not consider the language of some conventional and arbitrary system, dependent on the speech, the existence of social life, the category of time and will speak, etc. She believes that the root of the tongue is kind of a priori static system located outside the category of time and specific national, and is derived from the patterns of brain activity. Despite the fact that the language of deterministic scheme of thinking of the brain, its display part, that is, expressive plan, subject to significant social impact and is regulated by them: in due course in language pepper history, philosophy, life, traditions, etc. of the people-carrier language, which forms the individual national languages.

Besides it is considered that language and speech (sound) are not different sides of one coin (or sheet), or a result of the existence of each other. It is not preceded by language and is not the only instrument the implementation language. Language not always has sound design and audio decoding. It can exist without speech, and as a shell language (Thus as a means for its implementation) can serve anything that can carry information, including all kinds of nonverbal communication.

Approach to "linguistic logicism"
In contrast, supporters of logicism, the school accepts, that the problem of "true-false", "inference", "proof" - "denial", etc. belong exclusively to logic, and form words and sentences, declination, gendering attributes, typology of languages, psychological and communicative aspects of language, the problems associated with the morphology, mode of expression of syntactic relations, reflected in the structure of supply extra-linguistic reality and so forth are only subject of Linguistics (including, in conjunction with other disciplines).

In contrast to the school "linguistic logicism" concept is not identified with the word, logical and linguistic subject-predicate with each other. That is, not approved by a strict parallelism between the word and concept, sentence and judgments.

There is a possibility for symbols in an expressive term of one and the same concepts or judgments - individual words, phrases, whole sentences or groups of symbols of non-verbal sphere. Or vice versa - is assumed that the same word, phrase, sentence or non-verbal code can be an expression of a single concept, or the whole judgments. Besides: according to the synonymy or homonymy (Thus, identical content or forms) of words, phrases or sentences, they can be an expression of different concept or proposition, or the same concept or proposition can be expressed by multiple synonyms, phrases, or sentences.

To the origin of language
Belief that speech does not precede language and is not the only instrument for language performance. Language can exist without speech, and nonverbal means can play the role of shell (medium) for language. Humans developed the verbal language form because other channels of communication are not so extensive or comfortable. Here natural selection favours the verbal channel. Despite the dominance of the visual channel in everyday human relations with the outside world, it is insufficiently reliable for individual security. Human vision apprehends at any given moment only a quarter of the visible environment, and is usable for only half of the time (i.e., during wakefulness). The efficiency of the visual channel is also limited by various adverse conditions such as smoke, fog, or any other obstacles.

The auditory canal activity is available for 24 hours in the range of 360 degrees in space. The only barrier for sound propagation is strong noise, which is a very atypical occurrence. Furthermore, in order to communicate with a person visually it is necessary that this person sees the communicator. On the other hand, the auditory canal is open around the clock for perception of information from all sides, from anyone, and without any special settings. All this contributed to the human verbal (oral) form of language development.

It is believed that the mechanism of modern sophisticated and overly-complicated human languages development is identical to the writing evolutionary mechanism. That is writing development experienced stages: The same trajectory language has experienced and it evolved through stages: That is, some utterance, first substituted (designated) a whole sentence (linguistics), then — only a part of the sentence (linguistics), and then — part of the word .
 * Stage I: Grapheme = sentence (linguistics) (pictographic writing);
 * Stage II: Grapheme = word or phrase (ideographic writing);
 * Stage III: Grapheme = syllable (syllabic writing);
 * Stage IV: Grapheme = sound (phonetic writing).
 * Stage I: Phoneme = sentence (linguistics) (pictographic language);
 * Stage II: Phoneme = word or phrase (ideographic language);
 * Stage III: Phoneme = syllable (syllabic language);
 * Stage IV: Phoneme = sound (phonetic language).

title: Portal:Azerbaijani Language


text:
User talk:Learningitty

 Hello Learningitty, and welcome to Wikiversity! If you need help, feel free to visit my talk page, or contact us and ask questions. After you leave a comment on a talk page, remember to sign and date; it helps everyone follow the threads of the discussion. The signature icon in the edit window makes it simple. To get started, you may

 * Take a guided tour and learn to edit.
 * Visit a (kind of) random project.
 * Browse Wikiversity, or visit a portal corresponding to your educational level: pre-school, primary, secondary, tertiary, non-formal education.
 * Find out about research activities on Wikiversity.

 * Read an introduction for teachers and find out how to write an educational resource for Wikiversity.
 * Give feedback about your initial observations
 * Discuss Wikiversity issues or ask questions at the colloquium.
 * Chat with other Wikiversitans on #wikiversity-en.

And don't forget to explore Wikiversity with the links to your left. Be bold to contribute and to experiment with the sandbox or your userpage, and see you around Wikiversity! If you're a twitter user, please follow http://twitter.com/Wikiversity. --Ottava Rima (talk) 21:08, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

title: User talk:Learningitty


text:
User:Thefrettinghand~enwikiversity

Researcher in pure mathematics at Newcastle University and the University of Glasgow. My main research interests are low-dimensional topology, combinatorial and geometric (semi)group theory as well as universal algebra, decision problems, automata and regular language theory. I also maintain interests in algebraic geometry and homological algebra.

My current research focus is on diagram groups of semigroup presentations, which are a large, natural class of torsion-free groups closed under many group-theoretical constructions.

title: User:Thefrettinghand~enwikiversity


text:
User talk:Thefrettinghand~enwikiversity

 Hello Thefrettinghand, and welcome to Wikiversity! If you need help, feel free to visit my talk page, or contact us and ask questions. After you leave a comment on a talk page, remember to sign and date; it helps everyone follow the threads of the discussion. The signature icon in the edit window makes it simple. To get started, you may

 * Take a guided tour and learn to edit.
 * Visit a (kind of) random project.
 * Browse Wikiversity, or visit a portal corresponding to your educational level: pre-school, primary, secondary, tertiary, non-formal education.
 * Find out about research activities on Wikiversity.

 * Read an introduction for teachers and find out how to write an educational resource for Wikiversity.
 * Give feedback about your initial observations
 * Discuss Wikiversity issues or ask questions at the colloquium.
 * Chat with other Wikiversitans on #wikiversity-en.

And don't forget to explore Wikiversity with the links to your left. Be bold to contribute and to experiment with the sandbox or your userpage, and see you around Wikiversity! If you're a twitter user, please follow http://twitter.com/Wikiversity. --Ottava Rima (talk) 21:34, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Thefrettinghand. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Thefrettinghand~enwikiversity that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 00:06, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:24, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Thefrettinghand~enwikiversity


text:
User:Ripper777

Ripper777

title: User:Ripper777


text:
User talk:Ripper777

 Hello Ripper777, and welcome to Wikiversity! If you need help, feel free to visit my talk page, or contact us and ask questions. After you leave a comment on a talk page, remember to sign and date; it helps everyone follow the threads of the discussion. The signature icon in the edit window makes it simple. To get started, you may

 * Take a guided tour and learn to edit.
 * Visit a (kind of) random project.
 * Browse Wikiversity, or visit a portal corresponding to your educational level: pre-school, primary, secondary, tertiary, non-formal education.
 * Find out about research activities on Wikiversity.

 * Read an introduction for teachers and find out how to write an educational resource for Wikiversity.
 * Give feedback about your initial observations
 * Discuss Wikiversity issues or ask questions at the colloquium.
 * Chat with other Wikiversitans on #wikiversity-en.

And don't forget to explore Wikiversity with the links to your left. Be bold to contribute and to experiment with the sandbox or your userpage, and see you around Wikiversity! If you're a twitter user, please follow http://twitter.com/Wikiversity. --Diego Grez 21:42, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ripper777