text:
Talk:Seychelles

For future reference the Project:CIA World Factbook 2002 import can be found at Talk:Seychelles/CIA World Factbook 2002 import. -- (WT-en) Huttite 17:09, 1 Apr 2005 (EST)

The talk section contradicts the language section in the info-box... (WT-en) Yuletide 23:33, 24 July 2008 (EDT)

Regions
I cannot find a precedence for how nations of hundreds of islands are divided into regions, so I think the main islands (no matter how close) should be their own "region" and the clusters of uninhabited islands may be clustered together. So here's what I propose: When making a map, the lower islands (forming the last region) can be circumscribed with a band of color and the Granitic Islands a different color with a zoomed-in box in the upper left (where there are no islands) to show Mahe, Prslin, & La Digue amongst the Granitic Islands similar to the way zooms in on Mahe. Of course, you'll need to find a better, larger map to do this. (WT-en) AHeneen 22:49, 20 January 2010 (EST)
 * Mahe-largest island & most populated
 * Praslin-second largest and most visited
 * La Digue-third largest population and a bit rustic
 * Lesser Granitic Islands-technically the "Granitic" (since they are granite and not coral islands) or "Inner" (because that's where the population lives) Islands includes the above three, but all the others are smaller and have very small populations or are uninhabited (hence the "Lesser" in the title)
 * Outer Coralline & Aldabra Islands-all the uninhabited islands in the south, essentially everything south & southwest of Mahe.

 * Basically all the little rocks of the lesser Granitic Isles are just off the coast of the major Granitic islands, and I think they could be covered in the do or get out sections of the nearest island that qualifies for an article. So that region page probably would not be necessary, I think.

 * Of the red-linked islands at present, I think it might be worthwhile to give Silhouette Island its own article, albeit a small one, since it does have a hotel.

 * I can imagine the Outer Islands possibly being broken into a couple parts, since they cover such a vast area, but I agree that we can just leave that for another time if/when it becomes practical. --(WT-en) Peter Talk 10:41, 10 March 2010 (EST)

 * The problem with placing the rest of the granite islands in the do/get out section is that there's about 20. Rather than add clutter to the Mahe/Praslin/La Digue articles, I feel it is not too much to group those islands together, "X, X, & X are private islands while Z & Z are nature reserves", the "get in" is "X & X are accessible by boats leaving from Z while X & X are only accessible by by helicopter, etc.", see & do are generally the same, and there's only a few hotels on isolated islands so "sleep" won't be cluttered. The outer islands are all but uninhabited except for a few small plantations. They contain a grand total of three hotels and there are a half dozen or so airstrips. I think dividing them up is not practical. Silhouette certainly could be its own article as it has a resort and day trips by boat to walk on its many trails, snorkel, and for its lush vegetation. (WT-en) AHeneen 03:44, 11 March 2010 (EST)

 * I don't think the little uninhabited/private islands would add much clutter—if we cover them at all, my hunch is that each could just be a single do listing (if even that). No reason why we can't cover the Cousins, Aride, and Curieuse in the Praslin article; the Sisters, Felecite, and Marie Ann in La Digue, etc. That's how I was treating all the rocks floating around Virgin Gorda, which is, I think, about the same size as Mahé. We don't have any content for any islands other than the "big" three, and actually, we have almost no content for those either! So personally, I'd prefer to hold off before subdividing any further then is necessary. Anyway, I'll get up the map soon, to show what groupings I have in mind, hopefully they'll make some sense. --(WT-en) Peter Talk 10:27, 11 March 2010 (EST)

OK, maps done, albeit unpolished, and I think our options are coming into better focus (for me at least). The Outer Seychelles are straightforward, as we'll just have one article to cover them all. The Inner Islands are less so. Here are the options I see:
 * 1) Per AHeneen, we would have five articles: Mahé, Praslin, La Digue, Silhouette, and a catchall Lesser Granitic Islands article to cover the rest. (That name is a bit complicated, though, as Bird and Denis Isles are actually coralline.)
 * 2) Per the existing map, we would group all islands into four articles, anchored by the four major islands.
 * 3) Create an Inner Seychelles article, which would provide overview information for the region, specifics for the lesser islands, and links to the big four.

 * 1) 1 is unorthodox but would work—I can't think of other times we have handled islands in this way on Wikivoyage. The main disadvantage would be that it might not make sense to discuss, say, Cerf and Bird Islands in the same article, when they are quite far from each other. One solution might be to keep some of the islands grouped with main islands when very close to them (e.g., Sainte Anne and Cerf with Mahé), and then cover the rest (e.g., North, Aride, Frigate, Marnelle, Bird, etc.) in this catchall article. #2 is nice and simple, but the groupings may be a bit forced (e.g., Bird Isle grouped with Praslin). #3 is perhaps the most straightforward, but it creates an additional layer of regions, and threatens dreaded listings in an intermediate-level region article (for individual lesser islands). The way we handle this will probably set an important precedent for the many other island chain nations that we haven't dealt with yet, so this question is important.

Thoughts? --(WT-en) Peter Talk 21:09, 12 March 2010 (EST)

 * While I still think option 1 is good, a combination of all three may work well. The Inner Islands form their own distinct region (for the most part) they are granite (except two), where practically all of the population lives, and access between islands (boat, plane, helicopter) is frequent, and they are in close proximity. I've warmed up to the idea of listing small islands near a larger one into the larger's "get out" or even the "do" section, provided a redirect page is created to the listing (for example, Cerf Island is a redirect to Mahe#Get_out, where it is listed). The islands not particularly close to another could be listed in the understand and see/do sections of the Inner Islands. Of those, they fall into three categories: few are private/exclusive and only people staying at their resort may visit (North, Fregate, Denis—listed under understand & sleep), uninhabited and wildlife sanctuaries with air service (Aride, Bird—listed under "do"), or uninhabited with no transport (Mamelles, Ile aux Recifs—listed only in understand).

 * The outer islands are sparse, nearly unpopulated and are primarily accessed by about a dozen small airstrips (some served by Air Seychelles), supply ships every 2-4 months, and private yachts; thus, even given the distances between them, they are very similar and could easily occupy just one article given the sparse number of people visiting and the grand total of two resorts (hotels). One issue that needs to be addressed is that, as per Project:What is an article?, uninhabited islands do not get their own article. However, there are ways of accessing the islands and for some (divers, nature enthusiasts) these islands are a destination, so perhaps they can use the city/destination template even though they are a region in the hierarchy...an issue which should probably be discussed at Project:Region article template.

 * How's that for a plan? (WT-en) AHeneen 23:06, 13 March 2010 (EST)

 * I know next to nothing about the Seychelles, but from a big fuzzy picture level, I like the proposed five region articles from Peter's map below (nice work, btw). My general thoughts on breaking down islands are:
 * Small islands that are
 * close to an island/region with an article (especially with transportation links), and
 * don't meet the standard for being an article -- e.g., uninhabited islands, minimal facilities or attractions (e.g., just one resort)
 * should be grouped with the nearest island/region that has an article. I think this makes logisitical sense over putting scattered small inner islands in one region.  I had visions of Cousins, Marie Anne and Cerf in the same article (although maybe this would be appropriate, it just doesn't seem so looking at a map!). Not sure what to do if the nearest region is an island with several city articles... maybe list the small island in the city that it has the most significant transportation links to?
 * I'd probably stick the small islands in a See or Do section, although I guess it could go in Get out (I've never been sure what exactly can and can't go in Get out). A resort or hotel would be listed in the Sleep section and a redirect set up as AHeneen mentioned above.
 * I like grouping remote islands with few attractions and accommodation together in one article like the proposed Outer Seychelles.
 * I'm not sure where to draw the line on "remote" though. In the case of the Outer Seychelles it seems pretty obvious, but in cases like the Bird and Denis islands, I'm not sure.  They look reasonably far from Praslin, but don't fit with anything else (and don't seem to have enough content for their own article).
 * I'm not sold on an Inner Seychelles article. Like Peter said, it adds an extra region layer, and it would put all the lesser islands into one article - is it really better to put Cousins, Marie Anne and Cerf in the same article rather than the article for the nearest main island?
 * So, I think I'm saying I prefer #2, although I'm not sure about it for the Bird and Denis islands. On the surface, grouping the scattered little islands doesn't make sense to me (#1, #3) -- but, I don't know much about the Seychelles so I freely admit to my ignorance on what really makes sense. Since there is a resort on Denis Island and a wildlife sanctuary on Bird Island, is there scope to create an article for those two islands (even if it is small)? -(WT-en) Shaund 01:39, 17 March 2010 (EDT)

 * I have gone forward mostly with plan #2, but also taking Shaun's suggestion of putting Denis & Bird Islands into their own separate article, small though it forever may be. --(WT-en) Peter Talk 16:42, 12 May 2010 (EDT)

Inner Seychelles
First of all, Somalia is certainly not that close to the Seychelles!!!! If you are going to include nearby a nearby country for reference, it's probably best to use the northern tip of Madagascar and Comoros...not just because the Seychelles lie closer to Madagascar than Somalia, but it's probably not a good idea for the Seychelles to seem close to Somalia given the piracy associated with it. These two maps would probably work well for the Outer/Inner Seychelles region pages respectively, if we decide to only break the Seychelles into two regions, with the only adjustments to the first map being the "Southern Coral Group" being changed to "Plat & Coetivy" (they're just two remote islands). A third map, based on the first map above, ould then be used on the Seychelles page with just the two regions colored. (WT-en) AHeneen 23:06, 13 March 2010 (EST)

 * Oops! I clearly misread this map . Fixed. --(WT-en) Peter Talk 20:02, 14 March 2010 (EDT)

 * Ok. Did you notice the comments I made under "Regions"?(WT-en) AHeneen 02:54, 15 March 2010 (EDT)

 * Yes, and I'll respond as soon as I have time to think about it carefully ;) --(WT-en) Peter Talk 04:08, 15 March 2010 (EDT)

 * When this is finalised, please remember to add the regions to the East Africa Regionlist table. Ta. --(WT-en) Burmesedays 03:05, 27 March 2010 (EDT)

Staying safe
While there is nothing wrong with a warning or two this does look terribly alarmist. I was there 3 times, october 2010 the last time and the likelyhood of incidents is definitely much smaller than US, Hawaii or any European country that I know - not to mention some problem countries. No longer the paradise it was 10 or 20 years ago but far better than average. 89.204.153.237 11:07, 6 May 2011 (EDT)

 * If you find the description unreasonably negative, please change it to be more balanced, --(WT-en) ClausHansen 12:28, 6 May 2011 (EDT)

By boat
In consultation with Peter, i have updated the boat section according to the situation as of 2013 (removing Praslin express, which no longer operates, and adding new ferries and routes). I have also added a link to Seychellesbookings.com as it is useful to travellers, and the only place for booking their tickets with the mentioned carries (Catcocos and Interisland Ferries) online. Peter was of the opinion that a policy exemption to External links could be made in this case, due to its relevance. If there are objections to this addition, please discuss it here. Natataek (talk) 07:39, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Currency, time and spelling conventions
Below is a proposed infobox to let readers know which formatting conventions to use in Wikivoyage articles. Do you agree with these proposals? If you have direct knowledge of what is most commonly used in the country, please let us know. Ground Zero (talk) 16:57, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Moved to the top of this article. Ground Zero (talk) 12:42, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Seychelles are or Seychelles is?
We need to make a decision and keep it consistent. So which one? As an American, I would say "Seychelles is," but my experience is that on the BBC, they would say "Seychelles are." So should we go with that? Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:57, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

 * The Seychelles is almost always singular in most dialects of English today. It's plural in French, but this is the English Wikivoyage, not the French Wikivoyage. SHB2000  (talk | contribs | meta) 08:00, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

 * On the BBC football scores, even England and other not apparently plural places "have won the match." In the U.S., the Kansas City Royals have won the game, but K.C. has won. Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:51, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

 * Referring to entities in plural form is still sometimes used in British English (but this is mixed), so I'm not surprised that the BBC uses the plural form – but my native Australian English almost always uses the singular form for entities, like the US, so using the plural form sounds a bit unnatural to me. -- SHB2000  (talk | contribs | meta) 10:02, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

 * I'll edit out the plural uses of Seychelles for now. Someone else could tell us if we should make the country plural. Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:27, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
 * While it sounds wrong to my ears, the Government of the Seychelles and the Seychelles Nation newspaper use "Seychelles" as a singular noun. I don't see why we would deviate from the usage in the country. Ground Zero (talk) 10:55, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for looking that up. That's really good information. Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:56, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:Seychelles


text:
Talk:Shades State Park

Photos
Of Shades would be fab! (WT-en) Missvain 01:25, 24 December 2006 (EST)

airstrip
What's the name of the airstrip? There's a sign on a stone near the old strip, but I forget.

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Talk:Shades State Park


text:
Talk:Shahmukhi

VFD Discussion

 * Delete. This page appears to have been copied from iguide.travel site, complete even to the "you are here:home". No indication the anonymous user has the rights to it. Even without the concern about rights, without a description of how to pronounce or use these characters, just the alphabet does not seem useful for the traveller. The page was added about seven weeks ago, and user has not made any edits to wikivoyage since that date, so I don't think he's coming back to turn this into something legal. --(WT-en) Bill in STL 02:43, 25 August 2010 (EDT)
 * iguide gets their information from us, not the other way around. (Although I note they still claim materials are available under CC by-sa 1.0 instead of 3.0.)  This content very well may have come from somewhere, and it very well may be useless to us, but it's iguide got it from us.  (WT-en) LtPowers 10:11, 25 August 2010 (EDT)

 * Merge and redirect to Punjabi phrasebook. Pronunciation information is necessary, but no need to delete simply because it is incomplete, I'd say. --(WT-en) Peter Talk 13:14, 25 August 2010 (EDT)

Result: Merge tag added for Punjabi phrasebook. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 23:46, 30 September 2010 (EDT)

title: Talk:Shahmukhi


text:
Talk:Shaker Heights

=Related= Thanks Ryan! I didn't know we had a sidebar for that. (WT-en) SHC 21:13, 24 August 2006 (EDT)

title: Talk:Shaker Heights


text:
Talk:Shakhrisabz

Infobox
This infobox is far too long and lends an encyclopedic quality to the article. Can anyone suggest a way to drastically reduce it? Or should we eliminate it? (WT-en) texugo 03:49, 17 April 2011 (EDT)

 * The length is still an issue, as it looks strange. Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:42, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Article move
Wikipedia calls this city Shakhrisabz. The Uzbek/Tajik name is "Шаҳрисабз", which is similar to the Russian name. The Uzbek Hatuonal Tourist Office uses Shakhrisabz. I propose to move this article to "Shakhrisabz". Comments? Ground Zero (talk) 14:57, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

 * Support unless someone objects. —Granger (talk · contribs) 19:36, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

 * Yeah, go ahead. Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:47, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

 * Done. Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:41, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Ground Zero (talk) 01:18, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Sure thing. Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:21, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

title: Talk:Shakhrisabz