text:
Talk:Rayong/Listings

Amphoe Mueang Rayong
The Shrine of King Taksin the Great (ศาลสมเด็จพระเจ้าตากสิน) Located in Wat Lum Mahachai Chumphon, Taksin Road, with a huge tree of 300 years old at the front. Folklore says that King Taksin the Great tied his elephant to the tree while leading the troops to Chanthaburi for retrieving the Kingdom of Siam from Burmese occupation. The shrine houses a statue of King Taksin the Great. How to get there: From Mueang distirct, take Sukhumvit Road for 200 metres and turn right at the Taksin intersection into Taksin Maharat Road. Wat Pa Pradu (วัดป่าประดู่) Located on Sukhumvit Road in Mueang municipality, this ancient temple dates back to the Ayutthaya period. The temple was honoured as a royal temple in the year 1990. The wihan houses a large reclining Buddha image, 11.95 metres long and 3.60 metres High. Unusually, the reclining Buddha image lies on its left-hand side. The image was first built outdoor and the Wihan was built later in 1981. How to get there: The temple is accessible by two routes. The first route: From Mueang district, take Sukhumvit Road via Rayong Hospital and Wat Pa Pradu School, then turn left into Pa Pradu Road to reach the temple. The second route: From Highway 36, bypass road, turn right to Chantha Udom Road at Ko Loi Intersection. Through Mueang district, turn right into Sukhumvit Road and follow the first route to the temple. ==	City Pillar Shrine (ศาลหลักเมือง) Located on Lak Mueang Road, this shrine was first built of wood. Then it was replaced by a concrete construction with Chinese characteristics. The old city pillar was formerly in front of the shrine. A new one was later set up with a four-porched shelter. A celebration is held annually during the Songkran festival in mid - April.

Wat Ban Don Shadow Play Museum (พิพิธภัณฑ์หนังใหญ่วัดบ้านดอน) Located in Wat Ban Don, exhibiting a hundred Nang Yai shadow play characters, or Nang Yai, which is a large piece of leather carved and painted into different characters. Aged over 200 years, these characters were brought from Phatthalung in 1988. For the Nang Yai performance, please contact 3 days in advance. Tel. 0 5087 0235, 0 9831 6053.

Phra Chedi Klang Nam (พระเจดีย์กลางน้ำ) In the middle of the Rayong River, two kilometres south of downtown near the mouth of the river, is located a pagoda on an island. It is a landmark for the crew to indicate that they are reaching Rayong province. On the full moon day of the twelfth lunar month, a celebration will be held to change the robe covering the pagoda. Boat races and the Loi Krathong Festival will be celebrated here.

Si Mueang Park (สวนศรีเมือง) Called Ko Klang by the people of Rayong, this park totalling an area of 70 rai is located behind the city hall. This place was once used for the execution of prisoners and now it has been rebuilt as a park for people to enjoy. At the front of the park is a famous Buddha image of Rayong, Phra Phuttha Angkhirot.

Had Laem Charoen (หาดแหลมเจริญ) Near the mouth of the Rayong River, five kilometres south of downtown, is the nearest beach from Rayong. Tourists love to enjoy the sea and seafood for dinner at Laem Charoen Beach, which is also a famous place for its fish sauce.

Had Saeng Chan (หาดแสงจันทร์) Some seven kilometres from Rayong town, connecting to Laem Charoen Beach, the Saeng Chan Beach is a nice sandy beach where tourists can enjoy swimming and dining. Lots of restaurants are available for selection.

Had Mae Ramphueng - Ban Kon Ao (หาดแม่รำพึง – บ้านก้นอ่าว) Some 11 kilometres from Rayong town, make a right turn on Sukhumvit Road at kilometre 229 and head for Mae Ramphueng Beach which stretches for 12 kilometres. There is various accommodation for tourists along this clean beach. The beach road, 10 kilometres long, leads to Ban Kon Ao local fishery village.

Khao Laem Ya (เขาแหลมหญ้า) Follow the beach road, a bit beyond Ban Kon Ao, to reach the seaside hill. From this sunset viewpoint, comprising scrub forest and cape, it is possible to see Mae Ramphueng Beach and Ko Samet. The 670 rai area is headquarters of the Khao Laem Ya - Mu Ko Samet National Park. Administration is 200 baht for adults and 100 baht for children. Accommodation is available. Camping is allowed. Tents are available for rent at 300-400 baht per person/night. Pitching a private tent requires paying a fee of 20 baht per person/night. For more information, call the National Parks Headquarters at Tel. 0 3865 3034, the National Park Department at Tel. 0 2562 0760, www.dnp.go.th.

Rayong Aquarium (สถานแสดงพันธ์สัตว์น้ำระยอง) Located in the Eastern Marine Fisheries Research and Development Centre (ศูนย์วิจัยและพัฒนาประมงไทยฝั่งตะวันออก), Ao Ban Phe, the aquarium keeps various kinds of beautiful fish and sea plants. The centre conducts study, research and testing regarding marine biology and behaviors of marine life. A large aquarium with a tunnel allows visitors to see various beautiful fish as well as economic-related creatures living in the mangrove forest such as cuttlefish, crab, giant clam, and horseshoe crab.

The outdoor aquarium also houses various marine lives. The turtle pond houses hawksbill turtles, olive turtles, and leatherback turtles. The fish pond houses large species of fish. Visitors can witness the real underwater world in a special pond that houses starfish, anemone and sea cucumber. Various fishery tools in miniature are also displayed. The Fossil Museum exhibits stuffed and extinct animals as well as a display of rare animals such as humpback dolphin and Irrawaddy Dolphin. Seafood products are available on sale outside the building.

The Rayong Aquarium is open from Wednesday to Friday during 10.00 a.m. to 4.00 p.m. and on weekends from 10.00 a.m. to 5.00 p.m. Group visitors should call in advance. Tel. 0 3865 3741, Fax. 0 3865 1763

Sopha Botanical Park (สวนพฤกษชาติโสภา) This 32-rai park is lush with many kinds of trees, particularly Thai flora mentioned in literature. In the compound, three traditional Thai houses on stilts of nearly 100 year old exhibit ceramics from various periods as well as prehistoric pottery from Ban Chiang World Heritage Site. The park is open daily from 9 a.m. till 4.30 p.m. except on Thursday. Admission costs 50 baht. Tel. 0 3865 1688 for more information. How to get there: The park is located close to the road to Ban Phe, 17 kilometres from Rayong town. Turn right from Sukhumvit Road at kilometre 238 and keep going for 200 metres. The park will be on your right.

Suan Son (สวนสน) Just four kilometres from Ban Phe, 29 kilometres from Rayong town, many kinds of pine along with local trees make the beach road shady. The nice beach allows visitors to enjoy swimming. Restaurants and accommodation are available for visitors. For more information, call the National Park Department at Tel. 0 3865 2163, 0 2561 4292 - 3.

Khao Laem Ya - Mu Ko Samet National Park (อุทยานแห่งชาติเขาแหลมหญ้า-หมู่เกาะเสม็ด) Located in Ban Phe, 20 kilometres from Rayong town, the park totals an area of 81,875 rai comprising land, sea and islands. Its major attractions include Mae Ramphueng Beach, Khao Laem Ya, and Samet Archipelago. The most famous island is Samet where many private-owned bungalows are available. The park has three nature trails; namely, Ko Samet, Ko Kudi, and Khao Laem Ya. On each route, visitors can enjoy nature as well as beautiful view points. Admission fee: adults 200 baht, children 100 baht each. The national park offers houses and tents. Pitching your own tent costs 20 baht per person/night. For more information, call Tel. 0 3865 3034 and 0 3865 2136 or the National Park Department at Tel. 0 2562 0760.

Amphoe Klaeng
Suan Wang Kaeo (สวนวังแก้ว) About 38 kilometres from Rayong town, the park is on the beach road, 11 kilometres from Suan Son. Forest and garden, beach and beautiful bay characterize the park. Houses, tents and bicycles are available for rent. The entrance fee is 10 baht for adults and 5 baht for children. The park opens daily from 7 a.m. till 6 p.m. For more information, please call Tel. 0 3863 8067 - 8 or 0 2259 4150 - 1.

Laem Mae Phim (แหลมแม่พิมพ์) Without large waves, the beach is nice for swimming. Restaurants and bungalows are available along the beach. Laem Mae Phim is 48 kilometres from Rayong town. Via Sukhumvit Road, you can access the beach by turning right at kilometres 259.5, 263 and 268.

Sunthon Phu Monument (อนุสาวรีย์สุนทรภู่) The monument was built to commemorate Sunthon Phu, a leading poet in the early Rattanakosin era, two centuries ago. There are statues of Sunthon Phu and characters from his famous literature. The monument is located on the Klaeng-Laem Mae Phim Road, five kilometres from Laem Mae Phim.

Wat Saranat Thammaram (วัดสารนารถธรรมาราม) Built in 1945, the temple houses a main Buddha image imitated from the famous Phra Phuttha Chinnarat in Phitsanulok province. Four major pagodas surround the Ubosot. They include Phra Pathom Chedi, Phrathat Phanom, replica of Bodh Gaya, and Phrathat Chaiya. The temple is located one kilometre off Sukhumvit Road, turn left at kilometre 265.

Mu Ko Man (หมู่เกาะมัน) Mu Ko Man comprises three islands: Man Nai, Man Klang, and Man Nok.

Ko Man Nai (เกาะมันใน) This island is the location of the turtle conservation station initiated by Her Majesty the Queen. The project conserves the breeding of hawksbill turtle and olive turtle. Tourists can make a visit from 8.00 a.m. to 6.00 p.m. Various bays are good for relaxing such as Ao Ton Makham, Ao Hin Khot Ya, Ao Kongkang, and Ao Na Ban, which have also coral reefs. Ko Man Nai is five kilometres from Laem Mae Phim. Rental boat is available at Laem Mae Phim or Ao Makham Pom. The boat trip takes 30 minutes to the island. For more information about the turtle conservation station, call Tel. 0 3861 6096 and 0 3865 7466.

Ko Man Klang and Ko Man Nok (เกาะมันกลางและเกาะมันนอก) Beautiful beaches on the islands make them a nice place to relax. Private-owned resorts are available.

Amphoe Ban Chang
Hat Phayun and Hat Phla (หาดพยูนและหาดพลา) The beautiful Phayun Beach is 32 kilometres from Rayong town. Phla Beach, only three kilometres from Phayun Beach, is a quiet beach with a shady sea pine forest. Various hotels and bungalows are available for tourists.

Amphoe Ban Khai
Supattra Land Orchard (สวนสุภัทรา) The orchard is open for the public to witness its fruit variety such as durian, rambutan, mango, grape, star fruit and longan. During harvest season, from April to June, the orchard organises an orchard trip to explore the farm by car and enjoy fresh fruits for 30 minutes. The trip costs 120 baht each. The orchard is open daily for tourists from 8.00 a.m. to 5.00 p.m. Accommodation is available. For more information, call Tel. 0 3889 2048 - 9.

Amphoe Khao Chamao
Khao Chamao - Khao Wong National Park: (อุทยานแห่งชาติเขาชะเมา – เขาวง) This national park was established in 1975, covering an area of 52,300 rai. This lush forest with a great variety of flora and fauna is the watershed of the Prasae River. The national park has two nature trails for tourists to explore herbs and animal behaviour. The trails are two kilometres and three kilometres long, respectively. To explore the trail, registration at the tourist centre is required in advance. Admission is 200 baht for adults and 100 baht for children. Houses and tents are available for tourists. Pitching a private tent costs 30 baht per person/night. For more information, please call the park at Tel. 0 3889 4378 or National Park Department in Bangkok at Tel. 0 2562 0760 or www.dup.go.th How to get there: The national park is 71 kilometres from Rayong town. Follow Sukhumvit Road and turn right at the Khao Din Intersection, kilometre 274. The national park is 17 kilometres away.

Attractions in the national park

Khao Wong (เขาวง) Many limestone mountains surround a flat plain in the middle. The amazing mountains have a total of 80 caves inside. This is also a habitat of mountain goat.
 * Namtok Khao Chamao or Namtok Khlong Nam Sai (น้ำตกเขาชะเมา หรือน้ำตกคลองน้ำใส) This crystal clear waterfall is one kilometre before the national park. The waterfall comprises seven levels, stretching for three kilometres. The large pond called Wang Matcha, is a habitat of brook carp.
 * Pha Sawan (ผาสวรรค์) The viewpoint is 1.5 kilometres from the national park headquarters. On the way, visitors can explore nature. Contact the national park staff first.
 * Namtok Khlong Pla Kang (น้ำตกคลองปลาก้าง) The waterfalls are three kilometres from the headquarters. Ferns and orchids grow well in this lush forest.
 * Namtok Khlong Hin Phoeng (น้ำตกคลองหินเพิง) The small waterfall is actually in Chanthaburi province, ten kilometers from the headquarters. Water runs all year round. Nature lovers can enjoy wild flowers around the waterfall.
 * Krommaluang Chumphon Shrine (ศาลสมเด็จกรมหลวงชุมพร) The shrine houses the statue of Krommaluang Chumphonkhetudomsak, founder of Thailand's modern navy. He is much honoured by the people of Rayong. Turn right at kilometre 274 off Sukhumvit Road, the shrine is 10 kilometres away.

King Amphoe Nikhom Phatthana
Maha Chakri Sirindhorn Herbal Park (สวนสมุนไพรสมเด็จพระเทพรัตนราชสุดาฯ สยามบรมราชกุมารี) Located on 60 rai of area in the maintenance centre of the PTT Public Company Limited on Highway 3191, 25 kilometres from Rayong town. The park grows various kinds of herbs as well as conducts research. Visitors are welcome everyday from 8.30 a.m. to 4.30 p.m. Group visitors should contact in advance at Tel.0 3868 1827 - 30.

Do
Taphong bike route (เส้นทางจักรยานท่องเที่ยวตะพง) Bikers can explore agro-tourism in Tambon Taphong with a homestay service. The Subdistrict Administration Organisation of Tambon Taphong offers a tour package including accommodation and meals at 400 baht per person/night. Call 0 3866 4053 for more information.

Cooking course

The Thai chef of Tawan-Inn (Ban Phe)gives cooking lessons in Thai dishes and fusion kitchen. Available for guests of the guesthouse and TEFL-students. 0 3865 1635

Golf Rayong is one of Thailand favorite golf destination, where you can play golf all year round. The wonderful courses are invariably located close to Rayong’s major tourism destination, ensuring you can enjoy your golf and have a good holiday at the same time. So if you want to bring your family along, they are assured of lots of activities and interesting places to visit. There are several golf courses in Rayong.

Amphoe Banchang
 * Century Golf and Country Club (เซ็นจูรี่ กอล์ฟ แอนด์ คันทรี่ คลับ) Sukhumvit Road Tel: 0 3860 5054, 0 3863 5073
 * Easter Star Country Rayong (อีสเตอร์ สตาร์ คันทรี่ ระยอง) 214/5 Moo 3 Banchang–Had Pala Road Tel: 0 3863 0410-2 Fax: 0 3863 0418-9
 * Rayong Green Valley Country Club (ระยอง กรีน วาเล่ย์ คันทรี่ คลับ) 23 Moo 8 Ban Chang-Yaira Road Tel: 0 3889 3845
 * St.Andrews 2000 Golf Country Club (เซ็นแอนดรู 2000 กอล์ฟ คันทรี่ คลับ) 9/36 Moo 7 Ban Chang-Yaira Road Tel: 0 3889 3838 Fax: 0 3889 3845

Amphoe Pluak Dang
 * Great Lake Golf and Country Club (เกรท เลค กอล์ฟ แอนด์ คันทรี่ คลับ) Tambon Mab yang pom Tel: 0 3862 2630

Amphoe Wangchan
 * Wangchan Golf Park (วังจันทร์ กอล์ฟ ปาร์ค) 129 Moo 6 Tel: 0 2276 9072-4 Fax: 0 2276 9070

Driving Range

Amphoe Mueang Rayong
 * Amazing Rayong Driving (อเมซิ่ง ระยอง ไดรฟวิ่ง) 528/4 Sukhumvit Road, Tambon Nuen Phra Tel: 0 3861 8643, 0 1313 5668
 * Vac-Vac Driving Range 65/5 Sukhumvit Road, Tambon Noenpra Tel: 0 3860 8008 Fax: 0 3880 7090
 * V.J. Star Dust Driving Range (วี เจ สตาร์ ดัส ไดรฟวิ่ง เรนจ์) 385/3 Sukhumvit Road, Tambon Noenpra Tel: 0 3880 7090
 * Mab Kha Golf (มาบข่า กอล์ฟ) Mab Kha-Mabtapud Industrial Estate Road, Tambon Mabtapud Tel: 0 3868 1573
 * Poly Golf (โพลี่ กอล์ฟ) 2/15 Sukhumvit Road, Tambon Ta Pradu Tel: 0 3865 5055
 * Sri Mueang Golf (ศรีเมือง กอล์ฟ) Near Sri Mueang Park, Adulyathamprapat Road Tel: 0 3861 1934

Horse Riding
 * Slo Bunny (สโลว์ บันนี่) Mae Rumphung Beach Road Tel: 0 3889 8623

Amphoe Klaeng
 * Orchard Park Riding Club (ออชาร์ด ปาร์ค) 99/1 Moo 7, Songsalung Tel: 0 3861 7397

Scuba Diving Service
 * Rayong is one of the locations to enjoy your diving, in order to experience an underwater adventure of a lifetime. There are several diving club:

Amphoe Mueang
 * Dive Club Rayong International Diving School (ไดรฟ คลับ ระยอง อินเตอร์เนชั่นแนล ไดรฟวิ่ง สคูล) Chok Dee Square, Sukhumvit Road Tel: 0 1629 6513, 0 1611 5057 www.diveclubrayong.com
 * Ao Prow Resort (อ่าวพร้าว รีสอร์ท) 292/2 Moo 2 Tambon Phe, Samet Island Tel: 0 3865 1134-5 Fax: 0 3865 1962 Bangkok Office: 0 2438 9771-2 Fax: 0 2439 0352

Amphoe Klaeng
 * Ko Nok Resort (เกาะนอก รีสอร์ท) Ko Mun Nok Tel: 0 3866 1136
 * Ray Divers (เรย์ ไดร์เว่อร์) 267/136-7 Maptaput New City Tel: 0 3860 7480 Fax: 0 3860 7481

Boat Rental Amphoe Mueang Rayong
 * Island Tour (ไอร์แลนด์ ทัวร์) Ko Samet 280/108 Moo 2 Ban Phe Pier Tel: 0 3865 1999, 0 3865 1351 E-mail: islandtour1999@hotmail.com Service: Speed Boat from Ban Phe and Samet Island to Islands
 * The Toy Tour (เดอะ ทอย ทัวร์) 236/4 Moo 3 Tambon Krum Tel: 0 3863 8146 Service: Speed Boat from Mae Phim Beach to islands.
 * Chok Mana Tour (โชคมานะ ทัวร์) Tambon Phe Tel: 0 3865 1531
 * Sai Kaew Villa (ทรายแก้ว วิลล่า) Ko Samet Tel: 0 3861 5852-3
 * Rier Leus (Mongkol Tambon Phe Tel: 0 3865 1901
 * Rier Sang Samoot Tambon Phe Tel: 0 3865 1364

Thai Massage

Amphoe Mueang Rayong
 * Wat Ban Don Herbs and Thai Medical Center (วัดบ้านดอน) Tambon Choeng Noen Opened daily: 08.00 a.m.-17.00 p.m. For more information, contact to Tel: 0 3862 0127

Amphoe Wang Chang
 * Wang Chang Thai Medical Clinic (วังจันทร์) Wang Chang Hospital Opened Mon-Fri: 08.00 a.m.-20.00 p.m. and Sat 08.00 a.m.-16.00 p.m. For more information, contact to Wang Chan Hospital Tel: 0 3866 6174-5

Spa

Amphoe Mueang Rayong 0 2438 9771-2
 * Chomtara Spa (ชมธารา สปา) 83/8 Sangchan Beach Tambon Noenora Tel. 0 3861 2136 0 3861 6156
 * Chakra Spa (จักระ สปา) 2nd  Floor Rayong City Hotel Sukhumvit Road Tel. 0 3862 4333
 * Dhivarin Spa (ทิวาริน สปา) Le Vimarn Cottage Samet Island 292/3 Moo 2 Tambon Phe Tel: 0 3865 1134-5,
 * Ella (Become the beauty) (เอลล่า) 25 – 27 Shopping Centre 3 Sukhumvit Road Tel. 0 3861 9691

Buy
Preserved seafood (ผลิตภัณฑ์อาหารทะเล) Seafood from Rayong has been quite a famous souvenir among tourists for a long time. Ban Phe Market or Rayong Market offers a wide variety of preserved seafood such as shrimp paste, fish sauce, sun-dried cuttlefish, crispy fish, etc.

Fruit (ผลไม้) During May and June, orchards in Rayong are ready to show off their proud products: durian, rambutan, mangosteen, etc. Tourists also love to visit the province at this time of the year.

Products from sedge mat (ผลิตภัณฑ์เสื่อกก) The in-house industry of Tambon Kram, Amphoe Klaen has quality products, available at the outlet of Satri Asa Phatthana in the compound of the Sunthon Phu Monument.

Crystal products (ผลิตภัณฑ์เครื่องแก้วคริสตัล) The crystal factory in Amphoe Pluak Daeng, produces export-quality crystal works by Thai skilled labour. Visitors are welcome to see the process. The factory is at 161, Mu16, Nikhom Soi 4 on the Highway 3375. For more information, Tel. 0 3889 7029-31.

Festival
Rayong Fruit Festival (งานเทศกาลผลไม้และของดีเมืองระยอง) In May of each year, Rayong's fruit reaches its peak season. The venue for celebration is always changed between Mueang and Klaeng districts. Tourists can enjoy floats decorated with fruits, fruit contests, beauty contests, as well as fruit and seafood fair.

Sunthon Phu Day (งานวันสุนทรภู่) Organised on June 26 of each year at Sunthon Phu Monument, Klaeng district, to honour the great poet. Exhibitions and plays from his poetry will entertain visitors.

Changing the robe for Phra Chedi Klang Nam (งานห่มผ้าพระเจดีย์กลางน้ำ) The annual traditional event is held during the full moon night of the 12th lunar month, or in November. The robe blanketing around the pagoda in the middle of the Rayong River, in Mueang district, will be changed. Meanwhile, the people will celebrate the event along with the Loi Krathong Festival by boat racing and many kinds of local entertainment.

Thot Pha Pa Klang Nam (Waterborne Robe Offering Ceremony) (งานทอดผ้าป่ากลางน้ำ) During the Loi Krathong Festival of each year, or on the full moon night of November, people living near the mouth of the Prasae River will prepare a monk's robe at the pier. After completing the ceremony on the boat, a monk will come to get it. Normally, the robe offering ceremony is held at the temple. This special tradition has been inherited for over a century.

Eat

 * Classic Forest Restaurant (Tamnanpar)just off route 3 between Tapong and Ban Phe serves good food in a fabulous setting.

Amphoe Mueang Rayong

 * Botanic Place (โบตานิค เพลซ) 168/68 Radbumrung Road (Tel: 0 3862 3714)
 * Brookside Valley 129/5 Summaklong (Tel: 0 3862 9280, 0 3862 9282 www.brookside.co.th E-mail: brooksidevalley@hotmail.com) 40 rooms: 1,790 baht
 * Burapa Palace (บูรพา พาเลซ) 69 Sukhumvit Road (Tel: 0 3862 2946-9) 120 rooms: 280-490 baht
 * Chonnakanrin Resort (ชลนครินทร์ รีสอร์ท) 222 Mu 2 Leabchaihat Road (Tel: 0 3880 4998-9) 32 rooms: 2,500-10,000 baht
 * Daimond (ไดมอนด์) 051/2 Radbumrung Road (Tel: 0 3861 4577,  0 3861 4328) 31 rooms: 300-400 baht
 * Golden City Rayong (โกลเด้น ซิตี้ ระยอง)  530/1 Sukhumvit Road (Tel: 0 3861 8701-15  E-mail: goldencityhotel@hotmail.com) 171 rooms: 800-2,000 baht
 * Hat Saengchan Sea View (หาดแสงจันทร์ซีวิว) 149 Mu 2 Leabchaihat Road (Tel: 0 3862 0585, 0 3861 6357) 28 rooms: 750-1,800 baht
 * Kanary Bay (คานารี่ เบย์) 50 Mu 2 Leabchaihat Road ( 151 rooms: 2,500-6,500 baht
 * Kitima City Palace (K.S.City) (กิติมา ซิตี้ พาเลซ) 47/12 Radbumrung Road (Tel: 0 3861 7394, 0 3880 7826-8) 80 rooms: 200-500 baht
 * Melody (เมโลดี้) 144/1  Radbumrung Road (Tel: 0 3861 1359,  0 3861 6567) 38 rooms: 300-700 baht
 * One Way (วันเวย์) 048/1 Radbumrung Road (Tel: 0 3861 1904, 0 3861 3497) 29 rooms: 180-350 baht
 * P.M.Y. Beach Resort (พี.เอ็ม.วาย บีช รีสอร์ท) 147/394 Mu 2 Leabchaihat Road 145 rooms: 2,300-5,000 baht
 * P.M.Y. Villa (พี.เอ็ม.วาย.วิลล่า) 89 Mu 2 Leabchaihat Road (Tel: 0 3861 3002-3) 20 rooms: 3,000-10,000 baht
 * Rayong City (ระยอง ซิตี้) 11 Soi 4 Radbumrung Road (Tel: 0 3862 4333) 120 rooms: 650-3,000 baht
 * Rayong Orchid (ระยอง ออร์คิด) 001 Soi 6 Radbumrung Road 148 rooms: 900-3,500 baht
 * Rayong Palace (ระยอง แพเลซ) 109 Radbumrung Road (Tel: 0 3861 1259,  0 3861 6567) 34 rooms: 300-700 baht
 * Rayong President (ระยอง เพรสซิเด้น) 16/8 Rodjanakron Road (Tel: 0 3862 2771-6, 0 3861 1307 www.rayongpresident.com) 79 rooms: 500-600 baht
 * Rayong Sea View (ระยอง ซี วิว) 46 Mu 2 Leabchaihat Road (Tel: 0 3861 1364, 0 3861 5452) 28 rooms: 750-800 baht
 * R.M.Hotel (อาร์ เอ็ม โฮเต็ล) 048/5-7 Radbumrung Road (Tel: 0 3861 2339,  0 3861 1795) 29 rooms: 180-320 baht
 * Star 109 Rayong Trade Center 4 Road (Tel: 0 3861 4901-7 www.starhotel.th.com) 576 rooms:1,500-6,000 baht
 * Vieng Valee (เวียงวารี) 33 Soi 5 Radbumrung Road (Tel: 0 3880 9029-33) 75 rooms: 500-800 baht
 * Yin Dee Court (ยินดี คอร์ท) 2/8 Radbumrung Road (Tel: 03880 7770-7) 50 rooms: 500 baht
 * google camp (กูลเกิ้ล แคมป์) 74/99 Mu1 Sukhumvit road 11 Tel 081-8624599 80 rooms 3200-4500 bath and 400/day

Hat Mae Rumphueng

 * Ban Kon Ao, Laemya Inn 79/9 Moo 1; between Hat Mae Rumphueng / National Park (Tel: 038 653 633, 08 49 77 44 08, 18 rooms: 400-1200 baht
 * Ban Hinkao (บ้านหินเก้า) 146/14 Mu 1 Hat Mae Rumphueng Road Tapong (Tel: 0 3866 4471, 0 2451 9389) 32 rooms: 1,000-5,000 baht
 * Youth Hostel (บ้านก้นอ่าว) 89/4 Mu 1 Hat Mae Rumphueng Road (Tel: 0 3865 3374, 0 2513 7093) 22 rooms: 180-700 baht
 * Ban Nantasiri (บ้านนันทาสิริ)  180/1-3 Mu 9 Tapong (Tel: 0 3889 8655-6) 24 rooms: 600-1,800 baht
 * Ban Noree (บ้านโนรี) 82/12 Mu 1 Hat Mae Rumphueng Road Ban Phe (Tel: 0 3865 1648) 13 rooms: 500-1,800 baht
 * Ban Pladao (บ้านปลาดาว) 37/9 Mu 1 Hat Mae Rumphueng Road Ban Phe (Tel: 0 3862 1805 www.tyho.org, E-mail: sukya@yahoo.com) 9 rooms: 2,000-2,500 baht
 * Ban Prompong (บ้านพร้อมพงศ์)77/11 Hat Mae Rumphueng Road Tapong (Tel: 0 3865 5237-8,  0 2277 5725) 34 rooms: 500-1,500 baht
 * Ban Pulom (บ้านปูลม) 81/81 Hat Mae Rumphueng Road Ban Phe (Tel: 0 1821 7200) 10 rooms: 600-2,200 baht
 * Ban Sabai Sabai (บ้านสบาย สบาย) 60/16 Hat Mae Rumphueng Road Tapong (Tel: 0 3865 5435, 0 3889 8911-5) 42 rooms: 1,500-6,500 baht
 * Ban Silachon (บ้านศิลาชล) 77/66 Mu 1 Hat Mae Rumphueng Road (Tel: 0 3889 8607-8 E-mail:silachon@yahoo.com) 18 rooms: 1,000-7,500 baht
 * Bay View Resort (เบย์ วิว รีสอร์ท) 41/144 Mu 1 Hat Mae Rumphueng Road Tapong (Tel: 0 3889 8678) 20 rooms: 1,000-1,200 baht
 * Ban Kon Ao (บ้านก้นอ่าว) 78/74 Kon Ao Phe (Tel: 0 3865 2051) 8 rooms: 1,500-2,500 baht
 * Ban Rim Hat (บ้านริมหาด) 78/85 Kon Ao Phe (Tel: 0 3865 2133) 6 rooms: 500-800 baht
 * Chaita Resort (ชายตา) 11 Hat Mae Rumphueng Road (Tel: 0 3865 3060-1, 0 1735 6433) 12 rooms: 1,500-6,000 baht
 * Chom Tawan (ชมตะวัน) 78/47 Kon Ao Phe (Tel: 0 3865 2047-8) 25 rooms: 700-1,500 baht
 * Chanyarat (จันทร์ญารัตน์) 186/3 Kon Ao Phe (Tel: 0 3865 2057, 0 2393 5833-4) 9 rooms: 800-1,200 baht
 * Chonnikan (ชนนิกานต์) 77/2 Hat Mae Rumphueng Road Tapong (Tel: 0 3865 5249, 0 2379 2410) 12 rooms: 400-800 baht
 * Kon Ao Bay Resort (ก้นอ่าว เบย์ รีสอร์ท) 89/19 Mu 1 Hat Mae Rumphueng Road Ban Phe (Tel: 0 3865 2377, 0 2393 4081) 13 rooms: 600-1,600 baht
 * Intron Sea View 105/22 Hat Mae Rumphueng Road Ban Phe (Tel: 0 3865 3522) 10 rooms: 500-1,000 baht
 * Laemya Resort (แหลมหญ้า รีสอร์ท) 71/1 Kon Ao Phe (Tel: 0 3865 1601, 0 3865 1864) 16 rooms: 400-2,600 baht
 * Laem Ya Sea View (แหลมหญ้า ซี วิว) 78/63 Kon Ao Phe (Tel: 0 3865 1622-4) 30 rooms: 500-2,000 baht
 * Makmai Villa Rayong (แมกไม้ วิลล่า ระยอง) 87/4 Hat Mae Rumphueng Road (Tel: 0 3865 3747, 0 2585 0446) 24 rooms: 1,000-5,000 baht
 * Marine (มารีน) 79/1 Mu 9 Hat Mae Rumphueng Road Tapong (Tel: 0 3865 5101, 0 3866 4067-8) 39 rooms: 350-1,000 baht
 * Manot House (มาโนทย์ เฮาส์) 63/82 Mu 5 Friendship Village Hat Mae Rumphueng Road Tapong (Tel: 0 3889 8626 8626, 0 3865 5197) 12 rooms: 700 baht
 * M.M.Villa (เอ็ม. เอ็ม. วิลล่า) 78/58 Kon So Phe (Tel: 0 3865 1559-60) 10 rooms: 500-1,000 baht
 * Morakot Condotel (มรกต คอนโดเทล) 81/4 Mu 1 Hat Mae Rumphueng Road Ban Phe (Tel: 0 3865 2110-1) 75 rooms: 150-3,500 baht
 * Near Sea Side (เนียร์ซีไซด์) 144/6 Hat Mae Rumphueng Road Tapong (Tel: 0 2525 2208) 10 rooms: 700 baht
 * Rayong Condo Chain (ระยอง คอนโด เชน) 82/15 Mu 1 Hat Mae Rumphueng Road Ban Phe (Tel: 0 3865 2852-3) 30 rooms: 1,000 baht
 * Panachon (พนาชล) 82/2 Mu 1 Hat Mae Rumphueng Road Ban Phe (Tel: 0 3865 1675) 20 rooms: 1,000-2,000 baht
 * Parinya (ปลารินยา) 168 Mu 6 Hat Mae Rumphueng Road Tapong (Tel: 0 3865 5135) 11 rooms: 800-1,500 baht
 * Ploy Pailin Village (พลอยไพลิน วิลเลจ) 78/19 Mu 1 Kon Ao Phe (Tel: 0 3865 1373-4) 42 rooms: 250-2,000 baht
 * P.M. (พี.เอ็ม.) 78/31 Mu 1 Ban Phe (Tel: 0 3865 1579) 13 rooms: 600-3,000 baht
 * P.M.M. Villa (พี.เอ็ม.เอ็ม.วิลล่า) 78/72 Mu 1 Hat Mae Rumphueng Road (Tel: 0 3865 3241-2, 0 3866 4647) 50 rooms: 1,200-4,500 baht
 * Praemvadee Sea View (เปรมวดี ซี วิว) 105/1 Mu 1 Ban Phe (Tel: 0 3865 1740) 15 rooms: 500-2,500 baht
 * Prang Chanok (ปรางค์ชนก) 89/9 Mu 1 Hat Mae Rumphueng Road Ban Phe (Tel: 0 3865 1975, 0 2539 2842) 39 rooms: 800-2,500 baht
 * Prauksachart Resort (พฤกษชาติ รีสอร์ท) 144/3 Mu 1 Hat Mae Rumphueng Road Tapong (Tel: 0 3865 5026, 0 2585 0221) 28 rooms: 1,500-2,000 baht
 * Rayong Resort (ระยอง รีสอร์ท) 186 Ban Phe (Tel: 0 3865 1000-6, 0 2255 2392) 169 rooms: 3,547-12,000 baht
 * Rayong Gold Hotel (ระยอง โกลด์ โฮเต็ล) 77/9 Mu 5 Tapong (Tel: 0 3866 4164-5) 42 rooms: 400-1,000 baht
 * Sai Lom Tower (สายลม ทาวเวอร์) 190/1 Mu 1 Ban Phe (Tel: 0 3865 2123) 40 rooms: 500-600 baht
 * Sea Sand Sun (ซี แซนด์ ซัน) 182/112 Mu 9 Tapong (Tel: 0 3865 5371) 30 rooms: 500-1,000 baht
 * Sea Wind Resort (ซี วิน รีสอร์ท) 82/16 Hat Mae Rumphueng Road (Tel: 0 3865 2736-8 www.seaindresort.com, E-mail: info@seawinderesort) 48 rooms: 750-1,500 baht
 * S.M. (เอส.เอ็ม) 255 Mu 5 Hat Mae Rumphueng Road Tapong (Tel: 0 3865 5240, 0 3865 5472) 18 rooms: 1,000-2,500 baht
 * Suan Samoson (สวนสโมสร) 178 Mu 10  Hat Mae Rumphueng Road Tapong (Tel: 0 3865 5091, 0 38 89 8893 E-mail: Suansamosonresort@hotmail.com) 11 rooms: 1,200-8,500 baht
 * Suriyothai Beach Resort (สุริโยทัย บีช รีสอร์ท) 82/58 Mu 1 Hat Mae Rumphueng Road (Tel: 0 3865 3579) 20 rooms: 600-1,500 baht
 * Wang Tong Resort (วังทอง รีสอร์ท) 77/12 Mu 4 Hat Mae Rumphueng Road Ban Phe (Tel: 0 3865 1691, 0 3865 2303) 25 rooms: 1,200-2,500 baht

Suan Son

 * Ban Kaen Samet (บ้านแก่นเสม็ด) 40/20 Mu 3 Chak Pong Klaeng (Tel: 0 3864 8348-52) 35 rooms: 6,000-6,500 baht
 * Ban Krisanee (บ้านกฤษณี) 162/4 Mu 4 Suan Son Road (Tel/Fax: 0 3864 7725) 30 rooms: 500-1,600 baht
 * Ban Pha Villa (บ้านเพ วิลล่า) 95 Mu 3 Ta Rua Klaeng Chak Pong (Tel: 0 3864 8308, 0 3864 8152) 20 rooms: 800-3,000 baht
 * Ban Phe Cabana (บ้านเพ คาบาน่า) 206/1-2 Mu 3 Klaeng (Tel: 0 3864 8489-90 www.gocities.com/bannpaecabana, E-mail: banphecabana@hotmail.com) 35 rooms: 2,590-2,943 baht
 * Ban Sinsamut (บ้านสินสมุทร) (200/5 Mu 3 Klaeng (Tel: 0 3864 8337) 15 rooms: 1,000-1,200 baht
 * Ban Suan Hat Suay (บ้านสวนหาดสวย) 163 Mu 4 Phe-Klaeng-Klum Road (Tel: 0 3864 9021, 0 3864 7455) 10 rooms: 1,000-2,000 baht
 * Ban Talay Kram (บ้านทะเลคราม) 221/1 Mu 3 Chak Pong Klaeng (Tel: 0 3864 8530, 0 1833 7688) 36 rooms: 800-3,000 baht
 * Ban Tiew Son Resort (บ้านทิวสน รีสอร์ท 200/5 Mu 3 Klaeng (Tel/Fax: 0 3864 9004) 16 rooms: 1,000-5,500 baht
 * Camp Son Resort (แคมสน รีสอร์ท) 146/1 Mu 6 Suan Son Road (Tel: 0 3864 8313, 0 3864 8575) 40 rooms: 400-4,000 baht
 * L.O.M. Resort (แอล.โอ.เอ็ม.รีสอร์ท) 212/1 Mu 6 Suan Son Road (Tel: 0 3864 8554, 0 2512 1978) 30 rooms: 800 baht
 * Marina Hut (มารีน่า ฮัท) 162/8-9 Klaeng-Klum Road (Tel: 0 3864 8468) 23 rooms: 200-1,600 baht
 * Pinary Resort (ไพนารี่ รีสอร์ท) 158/1 Mu 4 Phe-Klaeng-Klum Road (Tel: 0 3864 8460-1) 31 rooms: 3,000-6,000 baht
 * Phe-Samet Villa (เพ-เสม็ด วิลล่า) 128-129/1 Mu 6 Suan Son Road (Tel: 0 3864 8374-6) 24 rooms: 800-2,200 baht
 * Raweewan (รวีวรรณ) 111/1 Mu 6 Suan Son Road (Tel: 0 3864 8378) 5 rooms: 300-500 baht
 * Talay Ngam Resort (ทะเลงาม รีสอร์ท) 205/8 Mu 3 Klaeng (Tel: 0 3864 8029-30) 18 rooms: 2,800 baht
 * Vanda Beach Resort (แวนด้า บีช รีสอร์ท) 61/4 Mu 4 Suan Son Road (Tel: 0 3864 8760) 14 rooms: 350-600 baht
 * Yoong Tong Villa (ยูงทอง วิลล่า) 162/11-12 Phe-Klaeng-Klum Road (Tel: 0 3864 8463-6) 40 rooms: 300-500 baht

Wang Kaew

 * Amornphan Villa (อมรพันธ์ วิลล่า) 147 Mu 3 Chak Pong Klaeng (Tel: 0 3864 8332-4, 0 2512 5591-4 www.ramornphanvilla.com) 45 rooms: 600-1,500 baht
 * Bang Bai Resort (บังใบ รีสอร์ท) 4/4 Mu 3 Chak Pong Klaeng (Tel: 0 3864 8244, 0 2541 9390) 40 rooms: 1,000-4,500 baht
 * Ban Kai Wan (บ้านไกวัล) 156 Mu 1 Chak Pong Klaeng (Tel: 0 3863 8038, 0 2286 0543) 25 rooms: 3,500-5,000 baht
 * Ban Pak Chao Lay (บ้านพักชาวเล) 30/1 Mu 3 Chak Pong Klaeng (Tel: 0 3864 8193, 0 3864 8155) 12 rooms: 300-800 baht
 * Ban Pak Chom Klaun (บ้านพักชมคลื่น) 99/9 Mu 3 Chak Pong Klaeng (Tel: 0 3864 7757, 0 9201 4964) 25 rooms: 1,500-12,000 baht
 * Ban Sai Kaew (บ้านทรายแก้ว) 266 Mu 2 Phe-Klaeng-Kram Road (Tel: 0 3863 8158, 02390 2146) 12 rooms: 3,500 baht
 * Ban Sung Beach Resort (บ้านสังข์ บีช รีสอร์ท) 64/3 Mu 2 Chak Pong Klaeng (Tel: 0 3863 8452) 18 rooms: 2,500-3,500 baht
 * Ban Sung Resort (บ้านสังข์ รีสอร์ท) 169 Mu 2 Chak Pong Klaeng (Tel: 0 3863 8118) 24 rooms: 2,000-2,500 baht
 * Camping & Resort (แคมปิ้ง แอนด์ รีสอร์ท) 155/2 Mu 2 Chak Pong Klaeng (Tel: 0 3864 8332, 0 2512 5591-4) 16 rooms: 1,600-4,500 baht
 * Chuen Warin Resort (ชื่นวาริน รีสอร์ท) 64/2 Soi Ao Chareon 3 Phe-Klaeng-Kram Road Mu 2 Chak Pong Klaeng (Tel: 0 3863 8022, 0 3863 8405 www.chuenwarinresort.com, E-mail: info@chuenwarinresort.com) 20 rooms: 1,200-1,700 baht
 * Hin Suay Nam Sai (หินสวยน้ำใส) 250 Mu 2 Chak Pong Klaeng (Tel: 0 3863 8264-5, 0 2243 0095-7 www.travelthailand.com, E-mail: hinsuaynamsai@travelthailand.com) 174 rooms: 2,590-3,531 baht
 * Novotel Colaria Rim Phe (โนโวเทล ริมเพ) 4/5 Mu 3 Chak Pong Klaeng (Tel: 0 3864 8008-12, 0 2237 1305-6 www.accorhotels.com E-mail: rimpaegm@loxinfo.co.th) 189 rooms: 2,472-3296 baht
 * Pat Lodge (พัฒน์ ลอร์ด) 97/5 Mu 2 Chak Pong Klaeng (Tel: 0 3863 8100-1, 0 2314 4382) 15 rooms: 300-2,200 baht
 * Pakarang Resort (ปะการัง รีสอร์ท) 155 Mu 3 Chak Pong Klaeng (Tel/Fax: 0 3864 8412 www.travelthailand.com) 60 rooms: 2,000-5,000 baht
 * Rung Napa Lodge (รุ่งนภา ลอร์ด) 154 Mu 3 Chak Pong Klaeng (Tel: 0 3864 8297-8, 0 2277 0288 www.rungnapalodge.com) 110 rooms: 1,200 baht
 * Rayong Chalet (ระยอง ชาเล่ย์) 4/32 Mu 3 Chak Pong Klaeng (Tel: 0 3864 8287-8, 0 2260 3592-9) 52 rooms: 1,819-3,513baht
 * Silver Beach (ซิลเวอร์ บีช) 219 Mu 2 Phe-Klaeng-Kram Road (Tel: 0 3863 8096-7, 0 3863 8463-5) 196 rooms: 1,800-4,000 baht
 * Siri Home On Sea (ศิริ โฮม ออน ซี) 151 Mu 3 Chak Pong Klaeng (Tel: 0 3864 8549-50) 25 rooms: 1,500-2,500 baht
 * Suan Wang Kaew (สวนวังแก้ว) 214 Mu 2 Chak Pong Klaeng (Tel: 0 3863 8067-8, 0 2259 4150-1) 113 rooms: 1,000-9,000 baht

Laem Mae Pim

 * Ban Suan Ao Kai (บ้านสวนอ่าวไข่) 231 Mu 3 Kram Klaeng (Tel: 0 3863 7357) 18 rooms: 1,000-4,000 baht
 * Green Wood Beach Resort (กรีน วูดส์ บีช รีสอร์ท) 237/1 Mu 3 Kram Klaeng (Tel: 0 3863 8023) 13 rooms: 350-1,300 baht
 * Ko Kaew Garden (เกาะแก้ว การ์เดน) 48/3 Mu 2 Sunthon Phu Road (Tel/Fax: 0 3867 2433) 20 rooms: 400-800 baht
 * Lom Talay Chalet (ลมทะเล ชาเลต์) 129 Mu 3 Hat Mae Phim Kram Klaeng (Tel: 0 3863 8124-5, 0 9188 7428) 25 rooms: 1,800-15,000 baht
 * Mae Phim Chalet (แม่ริม ชาเลต์) 116/2 Mu 3 Kram Klaeng (Tel: 0 3863 8128, 0 2391 4348) 24 rooms: 2,500 baht
 * Mae Phim P&M (แม่พิมพ์) 30/1-14 Mu 3 Kram Klaeng (Tel: 0 1400 0770) 14 rooms: 600 baht
 * Morakot (มรกต) 236 Mu 3 Hat Mae Phim Kram Klaeng (Tel: 0 3863 8005, 0 3863 8145-6) 27 rooms: 500-800 baht
 * Phim Beach (พิมพ์ บีช) 226/1 Mu 3 Hat Mae Phim Kram Klaeng (Tel: 0 3863 8016, 0 3863 8015)  18 rooms: 1,200 baht
 * Porn Phim (พรพิมพ์) (17 Mu 3 Hat Mae Phim Kram Klaeng (Tel: 0 3863 8109) 18 rooms: 500-1,000 baht
 * Rock Garden Beach (ร๊อค การ์เดน บีช) 229 Mu 6 Soi Pra Apai Manee Kram Klaeng (Tel: 0 3865 7241-3, 0 2934 7171-80) 80 rooms: 1,200-6,000 baht
 * Sin Siam Resort (สินสยาม รีสอร์ท) 235 Mu 3 Hat Mae Phim Kram Klaeng (Tel: 0 3863 8114-5) 62 rooms: 1,200 baht
 * Sea View (ซี วิว) 208/1 Mu 3 Hat Mae Phim Kram Klaeng (Tel: 0 3863 8046  0 3863 8136)  20 rooms: 800-1,800 baht
 * Tan Tarin Resort (ธารธารินทร์ รีสอร์ท) 93/1 Mu 3 Kram Klaeng (Tel: 0 3865 7339) 10 rooms: 3,000-4,000 baht
 * Villa Balee Resort (วิลล่า บาหลี รีสอร์ท) 308 Mu 3 Kram Kram (Tel/Fax: 0 3863 8080) 27 rooms: 1,200-1,500 baht

Amphoe Klaeng - Kao Chomao

 * B.J.Garden View and Resort (บี.เจ.การ์เดน วิว แอนด์ รีสอร์ท) 109/1 Mu 7 Klongdin Klaeng (Tel: 0 3866 9801-2) 56 rooms:
 * Ban Chomtawan (บ้านชมตะวัน) 193 Mu 6 Tambon Kram Kram, (Tel. 0 3865 7931, 08 9249 5051 www.chomtawan2004.com) 11 houses: 800-6,500 baht (Diving-Snorkeling Squiding)
 * Khao Chamao – Khao Wong National Park (อุทยานแห่งชาติเขาชะเมา-เขาวง) Khao Chamao (Tel: 0 3889 4378) 6 rooms: 800-1,600 baht
 * Klaeng Palace (แกลง แพเลซ) 179 Sukhumvit Road Klaeng (Tel: 0 3867 1757-8, 0 3867 1553) 70 rooms: 350-550 baht
 * Khum Rim Chamao (คุ้มริมชะเมา) 59 Nampen Khaochamao (Tel: 0 3889 4439) 5 rooms: 800-1,500 baht
 * Orchard Park (ออชาร์ด ปาร์ค) 99/1 Mu 7 Song Salaung Klaeng (Tel/Fax: 0 3861 7397) 24 rooms: 1,800-2,600 baht

Ko Man Nok

 * Ko Man Nok Resort (เกาะมันนอก รีสอร์ท) Saichon Mansion Building B. Room 1394/2 Chareonnakorn Road Klongsan Bangkok (Tel: 0 2860 3025-7 www.munnorkislandresort.com) 30 rooms: Package Tour 3,590-4190 baht

Ko Man Klang

 * Raya Island Resort (ระย้า ไอร์แลนด์ รีสอร์ท) 50/2 Mu 8 Mueang Kaew Village Bangna-Trad Road Samutprakran (Tel/Fax: 0 2740 2647, 0 3865 7233) 17 rooms: Package Tour 1,800-3,000 baht

Amphoe Maptapud - Banchang (Beach Site)

 * Banchang Cliff Beach Condotel (บ้านฉาง คลิฟ บีช คอนโดเทล) 222 Mu 6 Pla (Tel: 0 3863 0316) 100 rooms: 500-2,500 baht
 * Banpuk Lom Talay (บ้านพัก ลมทะเล) 109 Mu 5 (Tel: 0 3863 0088) 11 rooms: 500-1,000 baht
 * Ban Preeyapat (บ้านปรียาพัฒน์)  39 Soi Preeyapat Nongfab Road (Tel: 0 3868 5842-4) 30 rooms: 700-2,500 baht
 * Millford Banchang Beach (มิลฟอร์ด บ้านฉาง บีช) 169,171 Banchang (Tel: 0 3863 0019-23) 100 rooms: 1,200-3,500 baht
 * Phayun Resort (พะยูน รีสอร์ท) 2/4 Mu 4 Phayun Beach (Tel: 0 3863 0251, 0 2277 3041) 8 rooms: 700-4,700 baht
 * Phla Cliff Beach Resort and Spa (พลา คลิฟ บีช รีสอร์ท แอนด์ สปา) 241 – 242 Mu 6 Phla Road (Tel. 0 3863 0341-4) 90 rooms: 2,890-5,000 baht
 * Phla Resort (พลา รีสอร์ท) 78/1 Mu 2 (Tel: 0 3863 0358, 0 3863 0269) 30 rooms: 3,500-5,500 baht
 * Purimas Beach Resort (ภูริมาศ บีช รีสอร์ท) 34 Mu 4 Payoon-Namrin Road (Tel: 0 3863 0382-90, 0 2392 6900-3) 79 rooms: 2,400-4,700 baht
 * Rom Son (ร่มสน) 45/9 Mu 4 (Tel: 0 3863 0194) 15 rooms: 1,500 baht

Amphoe Maptaput – Banchang (Sukhumvit Road)

 * Banchang Grand Hotel (บ้านฉาง แกรนด์ โฮเต็ล) 3 Mu 1 (Tel: 0 3888 2300-2) 24 rooms: 400-1,000 baht
 * Banchang Palace (บ้านฉาง แพเลซ) 293 Mu 3 (Tel: 0 3888 2678-82) 150 rooms: 700 baht
 * Jor Koo (จ.คู่) 60/59 Mu 5 Sukhumvit Road (Tel: 0 3860 2445-6, 0 3860 2445-6, 0 3860 2012-3) 69 rooms: 250-500 baht
 * M.P. Grand (เอ็ม.พี.แกรนด์) 125 Wat Maptaput Road (Tel: 0 3868 1778, 0 3868 1346) 20 rooms: 350 baht
 * The Paradise Hotel (เดอะ พาราไดซ์ โฮเต็ล) 2 Soi 9 Hat Sai Tong Road (Tel: 0 3860 7812, 0 3860 8145-6) 30 rooms: 450 baht

King-Amphoe Nikomnpattana

 * Nart Nam Apartment Service (นาถน้ำ อพาร์ตเมนท์ เซอร์วิส) 36/6 Mu 6 Mabka (Tel: 0 3896 8513-8) 65 rooms: 400 baht

Amphoe Mueang Rayong

 * DD Restaurants (ดีดี เรสเตอรองค์) 314/7-8 Sukhumvit Road Maptaput (Tel: 0 3868 1473) German Food
 * D Major (ดี เมเจอรฺ์) 345/1 Sukhumvit Road Noenpra (Tel: 0 1864 5134) Thai Food
 * Gira Hut (จีร่า ฮัท) 7/1 Ko Whai (Tel: 0 3886 0878-9) Thai Food
 * Japraw Seafood (จ่าพร้าว ซีฟู้ด) Ban Phe (Tel: 0 3865 1107) Thai Food
 * Ka Tip Kao (กระติ๊บข้าว) 23/3 Tabuntook Road (Tel: 0 3880 5013) Thai Food
 * Kang Han (กังหัน) Tabuntook Road (Tel: 0 3861 3101) Seafood
 * Kam Pan (กำปั่น) (1) 2/17 Sukhumvit Road Tapradu (Tel: 0 3861 4772) Thai Food
 * Kam Pan (กำปั่น) (2) The Entrance of Plaenta Village Sukhumvit Road Thai Food
 * Koongpao Poopen (กุ้งเผา ปูเป็น) Sukhumvit Road (Tel: 0 1444 7633) Seafood
 * Krua Eat (ครัวอี๊ด) 104/3 Taksin Road Tapradu (Tel: 0 3861 8947)
 * Krua Tara Klaeng Suan (ครัวธารากลางสวน) 269/5 Maptapud (Tel: 0 3860 8522) Thai Food
 * Ploen Ta (เพลินตา) 4 Sukhumvit Road Chaeng Noen (Tel: 0 3861 1057) Chinese Food Seafood
 * Tamnanpa (ตำนานป่า) 167/6 Mu 7 Ban Phe (Tel: 0 3865 2884, 0 3865 2879) Thai Food

Amphoe Klaeng

 * Laem Chareon Seafood (แหลมเจริญ ซีฟู้ด) Paknamrayong Leapchaihat Road Tambon Paknam (Tel: 0 3861 3492  0 3861 3757) Thai Food
 * Lang Ma (แลงมา) Tabuntuk Road Tambon Noenpra (Tel: 0 3880 8918) North-Eastern Food
 * Rain Bow (เรนโบว์) 33-35 Sunkankasai 4 (Tel: 0 3861 1429) Chinese Food
 * Seang Chan Seafood (แสงจันทร์ ซีฟู้ด) 78/6 Mu 2 Leapchaihat Road Tambon Noenpra (Tel: 0 3861 6357, 0 3862 0585-6) Thai Food
 * Sri Ban Phe (ศรีบ้านเพ) Sai Ban Phe Pier (Tel. 0 3865 2054) Seafood
 * Suan-E-San (สวนอีสาน) 031 Tabantuk Road Tambon Noenpra (Tel: 0 3861 4578)
 * O-Cha-Rod (โอชารส) Paknamrayong Leapchaihat Road Tambon Paknam (Tel: 0 3861 4645) Thai Food
 * Chom Talay Seafood (ชมทะเล ซีฟู้ด) 147/1 Mu 3 T.Chakpong (Tel: 0 3864 8355) Seafood
 * Krua Kao Hom (ครัวข้าวหอม) 54/13 Thang Kwan (Tel: 0 3867 1834) Thai Food
 * Leam Tan Seafood (แหลมตาล ซีฟู้ด) 63/2 Makampom Bay (Tel: 0 3865 7100) Seafood
 * Sood Hat (สุดหาด) 149 Mu 3 Tambon Chakpong Klaeng (Tel: 0 3864 8132) Thai Food

King-Amphoe Nikom Pattana

 * Maab Tong (มาบตอง) Suan Supratraland Mabka (Tel: 0 3889 2049) Thai Food
 * Nart Nam (นาถน้ำ) 36/3 Mu 6 Mabka (Tel: 0 3896 8513-7) Thai Food

Amphoe Banchang

 * Krua Thai (ครัวไทย) 96 Mu 3 Banchang (Tel: 0 3860 3717-8) Thai Food
 * Payoon Seafood (พยูน ซีฟู้ด) 39 Mu 4 (Tel: 0 3863 0507) Thai Food
 * Rom Son (ร่มสน) 45/9 Mu 4 (Tel: 0 3863 0194, 0 3880 1176) Thai Food
 * Rim Talay (ริมทะเล) 2/32 Mu 4 Hat Payoon (Tel: 0 3863 1030) Seafood

Point of this page
What is the point of this page? Wikivoyage is not supposed to be just a bunch of listings, and no-one is going to search for this page. Do you intend to flesh out all of the listings with descriptions and repost them to Rayong? If that is your intention, read Project:Listings for correct format, and also look at tour (the package tour listing is in violation of Wikivoyage guidelines). (WT-en) Ikan Kekek 13:44, 18 June 2012 (EDT)

title: Talk:Rayong/Listings


text:
Talk:Râșnov

I am working on this(WT-en) Deni120 11:54, 3 July 2008 (EDT)

FInished(WT-en) Deni120 13:56, 3 July 2008 (EDT)

TO DO
Please do the following:

 * add a map!!!!
 * done - add info about when the trains leave from brasov to rasnov - (WT-en) Deni120 10:09, 26 July 2008 (EDT)
 * done - add the taxi number(WT-en) Deni120 10:09, 26 July 2008 (EDT)
 * add info about how the bus goes inside in Rasnov
 * add detailed info about walking in the woods
 * add detailed info about hiking and alpinism (such as the contact for the alpine club)
 * done - give info about horse riding (where, when, how much it costs, whom to call) (WT-en) Deni120 10:09, 26 July 2008 (EDT)
 * give info about ATV (where, when, how much it costs, whom to call)
 * give info about paragliding (where when, how much it costs, whom to call)
 * give more precise prices for eating and drinking
 * add more sleeping opportunities
 * done - add more to the get out section (WT-en) Deni120 10:09, 26 July 2008 (EDT)
 * done - in the see section say more about the old churches (WT-en) Deni120 10:09, 26 July 2008 (EDT)
 * add the surrounding caves and other interesting things to the see/do sections

When you do one of the following please edit this entry and mark what you have done. (WT-en) Deni120 08:43, 25 July 2008 (EDT)

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Talk:Râșnov


text:
Talk:Rügen

Name change
What's with the name change? Is Rugia better known to English speaking traveller than Rügen? Jjtkk (talk) 08:30, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Have come across it in Polish and Latin text but not familiar with its use in English. Lonely Planet and DK Eyewitness guidebooks use Rügen. --Traveler100 (talk) 11:04, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I can't remember ever seeing "Rugia" being used for Rügen on modern maps/brochures/web pages etc. in any language. Possibly in historical documents. ϒpsilon (talk) 12:51, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
 * It's Rügen as far as I'm concerned, especially if you are wandering around north-eastern Germany trying to find the place. I propose a revert to the original name. Jnich99 (talk) 07:56, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
 * I'd like to hear someone defend the name change. By the way, if we revert the name change, it will have to be reverted everywhere it's linked, which is not a reason not to revert but just something to keep in mind. Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:06, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi. The name change is due to several facts: a) Rugia is the actual English language name of the island, the language that we cater to here. b) It's easier to pronounce and look up for non-German travellers, most of them which lack the "ü" in their vocabulary. c) It used to be called Rugia virtually everywhere outside Germany before the GDR kicked in. The only reason it didn't appear under this name in various travel guides for this "Dark Age" was because hardly anyone could actually get there. This has changed, so everything's turning back to normal. d) It's used more frequently in guides, websites and for promotion abroad and officials also turn to use it from 2015 on for their official guides and websites in English language. But you didn't hear that from me did you. All the best, Horst-schlaemma (talk) 15:16, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Convert to park?
Rügen is an island and rather rural. Given that Mecklenburg Vorpommern currently contains no other regions, maybe park (along the lines of Franconian Switzerland) is the right type of article here? Hobbitschuster (talk) 22:29, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Rugia, really?
where is the evidence that Rugia is English for Rügen?

The tourist page for the place refers to itself as Rügen in English: http://www.ruegen.de/en/ueber-ruegen.html

Journalists in 2016 refer to the place as Rügen in English: https://www.theguardian.com/travel/2016/jan/24/secret-hideaway-foreign-correspondents-holiday-escapes

The NYT in 2011: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/21/world/europe/21germany.html?_r=0

the Wikipedia page in English is for Rügen, not Rugia the Britannica page is the same: https://www.britannica.com/place/Rugen

Griffindd (talk)
 * There really is not any I know of, as you see above I did not support the change at the time. --Traveler100 (talk) 15:37, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

 * Ask User:Horst-schlaemma, he probably is the only one who knows :). He hasn't been around for a while, though... It was "decided upon" in 2014 (see the discussion on the top of this page). Personally I strongly prefer the real name "Rügen" just as in the discussion above. ϒpsilon (talk) 15:43, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

 * I for one see no reason not to move to Rügen Hobbitschuster (talk) 19:47, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

 * Agreed. The place just isn't referred to in English much; therefore, the local name should be used. This isn't a case like Cologne or Rome. Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:56, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Propose if no objects in next 24 hours then I (or another administrator) can do the required deletes and renames. --Traveler100 (talk) 10:07, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:46, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Ruegen - Uebersichtskarte.png
 * Already kept. Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:59, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:Rügen


text:
Talk:Reading (England)

I moved this page, since Reading (Pennsylvania) also exists. --(WT-en) Evan 10:46, 21 Dec 2003 (PST)

I know nothing about cycling around Reading, so I've left the Get around/By bike section blank. Anybody care to fill it in?. -- (WT-en) chris_j_wood 01:11, 15 Apr 2004 (BST)

After looking at the style manual and other pages, I think I misunderstood how to represent external (ie not wikivoyage) links. I was putting the actual url at the end of paragraphs (as suggested by at least some of templates), rather than linking text in the paragraph. Ie.

A place. With some description. http://www.alink.to.something/

rather than

A place. With some description.

Other wikivoyagers seem to be doing the latter, and I find it more readable and more consistent. The difference between internal and external links is still apparant because of the way the software uses different classes and different link colours for the different links. And the latter approach is (apparantly) much better from a Google indexing point of view. So I have changed this page to use the latter approach -- (WT-en) chris_j_wood 13:37, 13 May 2004 (BST)

Is Reading A City
Hi 213.253.45.146

As you will see, I have reverted your change describing Reading as a 'large town' rather than a 'city'. My guess, from the fact that you felt the need to make this change, is that (like me) you are a Brit. Please believe me when I say that I did not do this out of any kind of political point of view. When speaking UK English I would unhesitatingly describe Reading as a large town and NOT as a city. However the bottom line of Wikivoyage's manual of style is that it uses US English and not UK English. And in that manner of usage Reading is unquestionably an incorporated self-governing place and therefore a city.

I know accepting that doesn't come easy if, like me, you have been brought up to believe that city status comes with a royal charter or an anglican cathedral, but Wikivoyage is after all catering for worldwide travellers and we need to talk their language. If you read the last para of the Understand section, you will see that I've tried to put this into context. If you want to take this further, I suggest you look at (and add to) the comments under 'Cities' in Wikivoyage_talk:Geographical_hierarchy' -- (WT-en) Chris j wood 18:48, 12 Jun 2004 (EDT)

Luton Airport
Could someone put info on the connection from Luton Airport? Thanks! (WT-en) sixzilly 04:27, 28 June 2006 (EDT)

I think the travel times to the airports seem all wrong. 40 minutes to Heathrow and 50 minutes to Luton. Is it really only 10 minutes further from Heathrow to Luton? According to AA Route Planner the driving times and distances are: Heathrow 40 mins (27 miles), Luton 65 mins (56 miles), Gatwick 72 mins (64 miles), Stansted 97 mins (84 miles). If no one objects, I suggest changing to this data. 221.216.205.131 12:18, 24 October 2006 (EDT)

I updated the road travel times based on Google Maps and personal experience--Newburyjohn (talk) 17:42, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Sweeney Todds
I have registered and amended the entry for Sweeney Todds. In all the time my friends and colleagues have been going there (about 10 years now) the service has never been below excellent and friendly, even when they are rammed full. also, regarding the previous microwave statement, that is only done when food is ordered that is not on the read out list from the waitresses (which consists of freshly cooked pies). (WT-en) Babychaos 09:28, 3 April 2009 (EDT)

Drink
I made a few changes to this section: Newburyjohn (talk) 15:12, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Removed "well-priced" from first para (Reading is not cheap compared to other similar places)
 * Corn Store is in Forbury Rd not Vastern Rd
 * Nag's Head pies are no longer from Sweeney Todd
 * Deleted L'Ortolan - this is already in the "Eat" section and however good the wine list, you are unlikely to go there just for a drink

Get around/Cycling
I added this section, and I have reasonable experience of cycling in and around Reading - but I'm sure there is more useful info that could be added.--Newburyjohn (talk) 18:39, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

title: Talk:Reading (England)


text:
Talk:Reading (Pennsylvania)

Wow. Hard to believe a bunch of UR MOM jokes lasted almost a year on this page. --(WT-en) Evan 19:03, 1 Jan 2006 (EST)

Transportation
Removed Blue Marsh Taxidermy from the list of taxi services. Taxidermy is the process of stuffing dead animals and not a form of transportation. —The preceding comment was added by 98.235.112.168 (talk • contribs)
 * Thanks! In the future, you can leave such comments in the Edit Summary when you make the reversion.  (WT-en) LtPowers 11:53, 1 January 2011 (EST)

title: Talk:Reading (Pennsylvania)


text:
Talk:Reading norwegian

This is a really cool article. It makes sense, I think, to incorporate this into a Norwegian phrasebook, though. I don't think we have one yet. See the Phrasebook Expedition (and especially the Phrasebook template) for more notes on making Wikivoyage phrasebooks. -- (WT-en) Evan 15:45, 6 Nov 2003 (PST)

title: Talk:Reading norwegian


text:
Talk:Recaș

VFD Discussion

 * Merge and redirect. Recaș and Recaş appear to be the same city in Romania. --(WT-en) Bill in STL 17:45, 24 September 2010 (EDT)

Redirected to Recaş. There was no content that needed merging. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 13:57, 9 October 2010 (EDT)

title: Talk:Recaș


text:
Talk:Recanati

This page contained works copied from http://www.le-marche.com/Marche/html/recanati.htm, so I've blanked it. --(WT-en) Evan 09:41, 8 December 2006 (EST)

title: Talk:Recanati


text:
Talk:Recife

Bus companies
Removed from the article: Bus companies serving Recife's TIP Bus Station:

 * Boa Esperança, tel.: +55 81 3452-1618 (to/from Belém)
 * Bonfim, tel.: +55 81 3452-1155/2066 (to/from João Pessoa),
 * Borborema, tel.: +55 81 3452-2859 (to/from Vitória de Santo Antao),
 * Caruaruense, tel.: +55 81 3452-2500 (to/from Caruaru, Gravatá)
 * Cruzeiro, tel.: +55 81 3452-2025 (to/from Porto de Galinhas, Tamandaré)
 * Expreso 1002, tel.: +55 81 3452-2796 (to/from Aliança, Carpina, Limoeiro, Paudalho, Salgadinho, Surubim, Timbaúba, Taquaritinga do Norte)
 * Expresso Guanabara, tel.: +55 81 3452-2100 (to/from Fortaleza, Mossoró, Imperatriz, Marabá)
 * Gontijo, ), tel.: 0800-311-312 (to/from Belo Horizonte, Montes Claros, Sao José do Rio Preto, Uberaba, Uberlândia, Vitória da Conquista)
 * Itamaracá, tel.: +55 81 3542-1011 and 3424-8331 (to/from Abreu e Lima, Igarassu, Itamaracá Island, Paulista)
 * Itapemirim, tel.: +55 81 3452-2111 (to/from Barra do Garças, Belo Horizonte, Brasília, Campos, Curitiba, Feira de Santana, Foz do Iguaçu, Goiânia, Rio de Janeiro, Salvador, São Paulo, Vitória, Vitória da Conquista)
 * Jotude, tel.: +55 81 3452-1741 (to/from Garanhunhs, Gravatá)
 * Leão do Norte, tel.: +55 81 2121-9111 (to/from Arcoverde, Campina Grande, Paulo Afonso)
 * Penha, tel.: 0800-723-2122 (to/from Feira de Santana, Rio de Janeiro, Salvador)
 * Princesa do Agreste, tel.: +55 81 3452-1371 (to/from Araripina, Crato, Juazeiro do Norte, Salgueiro, Serra Talhada, Teresina)
 * Progresso, (to/from Aracaju, Araripina, Arcoverde, Campina Grande, Garanhuns, João Pessoa, Juazeiro, Monteiro, Natal, Paulo Afonso, Pesqueira, São Luís, Serra Talhada, Teresina, Triunfo). Tickets can be bought in Boa Viagem, tel.: +55 81 3465-4640; Boa Vista, +55 81 3231-1860; MetroRec Central Station, +55 81 3424-5648
 * Real Alagoas, tel.: +55 81 3452-1511 (to/from Aracaju, Ipojuca, Maceió, Maragogi, Sao José da Coroa Grande, Sirinhaém)
 * São Domingos, tel.: +55 81 3452-2462
 * São Geraldo, tel.: +55 81 3452-2733 (to/from Caruaru, Curitiba, Foz do Iguaçu, Garanhuns, Palmas, Petrolina, Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo)
 * Transacreana, tel.: +55 11 6698-7399 and +55 61 8402-8418 (to/from Cacoal, Cuiabá, Feira de Santana, Ji-Paraná, Porto Velho, Rio Branco, Rondonópolis, Vitória da Conquista)

(WT-en) texugo 10:38, 28 September 2011 (EDT)

Listy sections
This article looks like a strong Guide, and as a reader who hasn't been to Recife, I think it's close to being ready for a dotm nomination. However, there are a few sections with listy entries, including Do#Theaters, Do#Cinema, and part of Buy and Drink#Dance clubs. So your mission, if you have knowledge and choose to fulfill it, is to put useful descriptions into the entries in those sections. Once that's done, I'll be happy to post a DotM nomination if no-one else has in the interim. The article also has room for some more photos, if anyone would like to add some good ones. Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:36, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

Banner pictures
A selection of page banners. The current one might not be the best for the article. --Renek78 (talk) 20:08, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

"The Recife"

 * I happen to have just remembered a good friend of mine, of "Portuguese Pernambucan traditional" descent, chatting with me, pointing that older local people refer to the city in Portuguese as "The Recife" (e. g. they always say estou no Recife, instead of estou em Recife as I or he will usually say "I'm in Recife"), much like Oporto and The Hague. This factoid is of little practical use to the English-speaking traveller, but merits a slight mention, hence I'll adjust the city name's translation on Understand. Ibaman (talk) 15:50, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

 * This is going in WV:Discover. --Ypsilon (talk) 16:12, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Impressive Writing
This sounds like something Rick Steves would write. It's hard to imagine Recife has all this stuff and yet has this icky feeling of being overrun with crime. Lazarus1255 (talk) 13:26, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
 * for my share of the work done in this article, many thanks. Thank YOU for taking it to the next level. Wikivoyage is the best. Ibaman (talk) 19:49, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item is missing permission
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item is missing permission information and may be deleted: You can see the details at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:38, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Estádio dos Aflitos - Reinauguração 2018.jpg

 * Missing permission. Nothing we can do about. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 08:11, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

 * I deleted the thumbnail already. Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:39, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

title: Talk:Recife


text:
Talk:Red Bank

Comments
''On my talk page I was asked: ... it's an area in South Portland, Maine could you possibly try something here also there might be other red banks? disamb? --(WT-en) SkunkService 05:01, 8 March 2009 (EDT)''

I responded:
 * Wikipedia:Red Bank suggests there are at least 4 places called Red Bank. You could move the existing Red Bank article to a suitably named alternative that follows our conventions. Then disambiguate the different Red Bank articles. I suggest you discuss it first at Talk:Red Bank, explaining what the problem is and, if possible, propose a solution. - (WT-en) Huttite 05:34, 8 March 2009 (EDT)

Once an article about Red Bank (Maine) has been created, I would then suggest moving Red Bank to Red Bank (New Jersey), then making a disambiguation page out of the redirect. Until we have two articles that need to use the same name about different places, there is no need for a disambiguation page. Feel free to plunge forward. - (WT-en) Huttite 05:34, 8 March 2009 (EDT)

iPhone App, Only One Red Bank
There is a helpful iPhone App, called "Only One Red Bank" that provides up-to-date information on Red Bank dining, Shopping, Events, etc. See: https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/only-one-red-bank/id482103396?mt=8

Where would be a good place to describe this App in the Red Bank page? Thanks! --Lbeaumont (talk) 12:22, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
 * i fesr that there is no place to place that App on the page because we only link to primary sources. Only chance would be if it is an official source. jan (talk) 12:25, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

title: Talk:Red Bank


text:
Talk:Red Centre

Are we sure this should be a redirect to Uluru? If you look at what links here, it seems like it should be more of a region? (WT-en) Jonboy 15:13, 9 March 2006 (EST)

Permission
In regards to all Northern Territory information I have added, you may notice that some of the text I am adding appears in another website eg travelnt.com, that is because I am the original author. Lex 11:39, 12 February 2009 (EDT) Please contact Ryan Campbell if you require confirmation.

Ryan Campbell Manager – Web and Digital Development Brand & Marketing Services Marketing Communications Tourism NT t: 61 8 8999 3919  :   f: 61 8 8999 3920 e: ryan.campbell@nt.gov.au

edit 7 October
I am user Teedeent - I forgot my password so have now created TNT account. My spam filter doesnt allow emails from wikivoyage to come through so my password is lost forever.

Have added a little information about visiting aboriginal communities, and made Indigenous History a new heading as I feel it is very important.

Banner
Title. I just feel that the current is too specific to Ulu r u. -- SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 11:41, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

 * Maybe, but it's by far the best picture out of these three. Otherwise, I'd pick 2 ahead of 1 for 2nd place. Which one do you prefer? Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:52, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I too prefer 2 ahead of 1. -- SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 12:17, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Yeah, but do you prefer 2 to 0? Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:32, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I do. IMO, I don't really support having a banner depicting Ulu r u in three pages and it's way too specific to be representative of the region as a whole. There's also some banners in Talk:Watarrka National Park that can be recycled here. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 12:40, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
 * 0, 2, 1 to me. 0 looks like the reddest, you know. Of the banners at Talk:Watarrka National Park, 3 would be the best fitting here IMO, but I see it's been in use in that article already. Vidimian (talk) 14:15, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Banner 0. --Comment by Selfie City (talk) (contributions) 17:31, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Settlements
Charlotte Waters is listed as town, but the linked Wikipedia article says "Only a ruin remains today". If there is no town, just ruins of historic significance, shouldn't it be an other destination, or at least described as a former town? Yulara is described as a resort town, with nothing but tourists and the staff. Is Alice Springs the only real town in the area? –LPfi (talk) 11:34, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
 * In Australia, a settlement needs to have at least over 200 inhabitants to be considered a town, and over 10,000 inhabitants to be a city. In this case, Alice Springs is the only city (as it has over 10k inhabitants), and it's one of only two cities of its size in the Outback (the other being Broken Hill in New South Wales).

 * However there are several towns and communities with populations between 200 and 10,000 in the Red Centre such as the Ltyentye Apurte Community or Mutitjulu, but these are not destinations a tourist would want to go to. There is also Ghan, which is a community of 124, but all that's there for travellers in Ghan is a roadhouse.

 * For Charlotte Waters, it's definitely an Other destination – you need to drive 208 km on unsealed roads, and even then, it has a population of zero. But I don't think it passes wv:wiaa, so I don't think it should be linked. -- SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 11:59, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

title: Talk:Red Centre


text:
Talk:Redmont

Redmont
Can't find any place to name this page-troll-created article for. Probably would have speedy-deleted it if I had my shiny buttons. Would I be wrong? (WT-en) OldPine 11:10, 21 September 2007 (EDT)

 * How about a redirect to Redmond instead? --(WT-en) Peter Talk 16:25, 21 September 2007 (EDT)

 * It occured to me, and I don't hate the idea. (WT-en) OldPine 17:46, 21 September 2007 (EDT)

 * Oh, and to answer your question, this was "page creation vandalism" and I don't think a speedy delete would have been wrong. But a redirect seems marginally better in this particular case. --(WT-en) Peter Talk 20:47, 21 September 2007 (EDT)

 * Keep & redirect to Birmingham (Alabama) ~ 203.144.143.7 18:28, 25 September 2007 (EDT)

 * The fact that it almost means several different things, yet doesn't really mean any of them, speaks volumes. Delete. -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 13:18, 8 October 2007 (EDT)

 * Redirect to Birmingham (Alabama)... can't find any cities by that name, only a district of B'ham – (WT-en) cacahuate  talk 01:53, 15 October 2007 (EDT)

Outcome: Already Redirected to Birmingham (Alabama) --(WT-en) NJR_ZA 03:07, 22 October 2007 (EDT)

title: Talk:Redmont


text:
Talk:Red Rock (Ontario)

We drove off the beaten path to Red Rock Inn, and it was a wonderful experience. The room in this old inn was magnificent, and the dinner was exquisite. If you love solitude with all the modern conveniences, the Red Rock Inn is a must stay, or at a minimum a lunch or supper.

title: Talk:Red Rock (Ontario)


text:
Talk:Red Sea Coast

Red links
Ceever, you reverted to put red-link destinations back onto this page. Are you intending to create pages for all of these? Some are very small, or part of a larger resort, and all are likely to remain covid-blighted for many months ahead, so I wonder what is realistically possible this year. Grahamsands (talk) 09:28, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Well, someone else could turn these red links into articles if the destinations are worth an article. I would recommend checking whether or not those articles are worth creating. --Comment by Selfie City  ( talk  |  contributions ) 11:03, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Marsa Alam is the strongest candidate, though now doesn't seem a good time. But would anyone lose motivation to develop a page just because that place wasn’t red-linked? So in the absence of a reason for red-links, I’ll revert the style to normal text. This coast has developed from north to south, so it’s natural to group its "cities" the same way, bringing clusters (eg resorts using the same airport) together. Grahamsands (talk) 12:42, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

 * Yes, no one is going to add one now. --Comment by Selfie City  ( talk  |  contributions ) 13:08, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

 * I do not agree with this approach, since it has an additional upside to have red links leading into nirvana (besides the fact that a reader might feel tempted to create the article), namely that it is automatically linked if someone creates the relevant site without taking note of the region article. Also, it is standard for many other articles that we rather keep the red ones, as far as I understand. Otherwise, please start a bigger discussion in the pub. Cheers, Ceever (talk) 20:49, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Good suggestion, I've done that. Grahamsands (talk) 13:51, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

(LATER) That was a helpful discussion in the pub. In the light of it, shall we consider some priorities for page development in this region? Those at the top definitely need developing soon, those at the bottom are “negative priority” because the place is insignificant, and any existing page is a candidate for merger / redirection. Those in between are dubious value especially just now, and perhaps simplest to leave alone until returning traveller reports indicate whether they have something worth recording.

My own ordering would be:

Marsa Alam top priority. It’s a major resort with an international airport and it’s the main entry to the south of this region. There’s a string of subsidiary resorts north up to Port Ghalib and south down to Hamata which might fold into Marsa Alam – most of their page content is generic Red Sea stuff.

Safaga deserves a page, it’s a substantial port for industry and pilgrimage. There’s a page for its beach strip Soma Bay – IMO we don’t need both, so that page should merge into Safaga. Both names are used in tourist literature.

Port Suez is a poor outline page that should be populated. It’s a big city but industrial and there’s little reason to visit. ✅

Several other places have pages on WV-DE, but I wonder what is really there nowadays. You know what it’s like along that coast, a rash of speculative developments that rapidly decay into ghost towns – and that was before the impact of covid. Some in-between places are:

 * - Ras Gharib is just industrial, scant reason to visit.
 * - Sahl Hasheesh and Serenia could be mentioned within Hurghada.
 * - Makadi Bay likewise.
 * - Sharm el Naqa and Abu Soma are part of Safaga / Soma Bay.
 * - Coraya Bay is part of Port Ghalib.
 * - Hamata is only an hour or so south of Marsa Alam.

Bottom of the heap, and bottom of the map (not a coincidence):
 * - Berenice has antiquities but no accommodation. It doesn’t merit a page.
 * - Shalateen is on the edge of the mysterious triangle, which may only be entered by military permission. Nothing there. Visitors to these parts come by liveaboard boat and seldom venture ashore.

Does this approach and ordering seem reasonable? Grahamsands (talk) 08:11, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

 * Hi Grahamsands
 * Thanks for your efforts! I am a little confused about the summary above, so let me just point out what I believe is important:

 * So, you wanna break up the north to south listing again, not putting Port Suez at top? This is unfortunate. Also, Port Suez together with Suez is kind of the largest area in this region population wise. It would make sense for WV to have it atop. Maybe we can convert Port Suez to Suez with a slight focus on Port Suez to keep this large area on top.
 * 1) Marsa Alam I don't know, it states "Hurghada is the largest and best-developed of the string of coastal tourist resorts", and Hurghada really is a big city with a lot of tourist. It might not be as fancy as Marsa Alam, but it is not really on us to decide where to put the focus.
 * 2) I don't mind a listing/article for Safaga, however each article (like Soma Bay) existing under this region should get a proper listing inside of the region article, either under "Cities" if there are less then 9 or under "Other destination" especially if it is not a city or town. If it is a sight, one might even put it under "See" if there are too many listings under the former two subchapters.
 * 3) Berenice states it has resorts ... but not accommodations?
 * 4) "Bi'r Tawīl" should get a proper listing under "Other destination".
 * Does this help and make sense? Cheers Ceever (talk) 10:53, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I prefer the paragraph format for Bir Tawil and the Halaib Triangle as supported by Tone. I wonder if content here about Bir Tawil should be used in its respective article. --Comment by Selfie City  ( talk  |  contributions ) 11:21, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Moved the main information for Bir Tawil into the relevant article. Though, Bir Tawil should be kept a short and proper listing.
 * Otherwise, Tone does not indicate that there should be paragraphs/subchapters under "Other destination". I am fine with a subchapter for Halaib, but this really belongs into Understand or See.
 * Cheers Ceever (talk) 18:39, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Fair enough, if that is what you want to do.
 * What about likewise moving the content about Halaib Triangle to its own article? --Comment by Selfie City  ( talk  |  contributions ) 21:56, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Sorry, you've all grabbed the wrong end of the stick. What I suggested above was priorities for page development in this region. It was nothing to do with how those cities are described on the region page. Marsa Alam is among the largest resorts in the region but has no page at all, yet there's good coverage on WV-DE - does that sound like a priority to remedy or not? (Hurghada is bigger but has a page, rated "outline" but going-on usable, so I didn't mention it, as I was referring to major work not the minor updating that all pages routinely need.) At the other end of the scale, Halayib Triangle is a barren area with next-to-no visitor attractions or facilities that may only be entered by military permission - does that sound like a work priority or not? Grahamsands (talk) 09:45, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Sure. I suggested the Halaib Triangle because content for the article is already included here at Red Sea Coast. --Comment by Selfie City  ( talk  |  contributions ) 11:41, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Port Suez has been fleshed out, so that one is sorted. The limitation was that in present circumstances, info couldn't be verified, but it seemed best just to add it regardless and check once normality returns. This should be less of a problem with Marsa Alam and Safaga / Soma Bay, as people were visiting right up to March so there are travelers' reports. Any volunteers for improving either of those? Grahamsands (talk) 19:14, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Aaahhh, now I understand. Though, I wouldn't be too keen to create these articles. If they are not there yet or maintained, there is probably a reason. For example, looking at Marsa Alam and Hurghada, I reckon Hurghada is just better maintained because people that go there are more interested in travel advice that can be found on WV. On the other hand, Marsa Alam is mostly for all-incl. tourists that have enough money to let their trips into the region be organised - they wouldn't bother about WV.
 * I understand that a lot more can be achieved if there would be structured initiative for articles on WV, but it is just not how WV works.
 * However, if you feel like something could be done, you could create a basic article and refer to the German version for translation. Maybe someone will pick up the work and move the information from German into English, at least for the articles where there is comprehensive information available.
 * Cheers Ceever (talk) 12:45, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Huthi attack warning
It is unclear to me how the attacks at sea affects safety at shore. Have there been attacks by that risk collateral damage there? (The US and UK attacks have been in Jemen, not in Egypt.) Also, this article is about the "Red Sea Coast" – how deep inland should one avoid? All of the region? –LPfi (talk) 08:06, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

 * You might want to ask who added the warning box (I trimmed it a little). --  SHB2000  (talk | contribs | meta) 08:09, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
 * @LPfi So you think that visiting coastal cities are still safe despite sea warfares? Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 08:23, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
 * I don't know the situation, but all that I have heard is about attacks on ships at sea and attack on Yemen (oops, used Swedish spelling above). Some missile might of course go astray, but I assume Egypt is far enough that you can ignore the risk, unless ships in or near Egyptian harbours are targeted (or diving vessels are), or the fairway is close to the coast (which I believe it isn't). I would like to see some authoritative warning on the risk before adding a warningbox. –LPfi (talk) 08:37, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Also, it seems the Huthis would need capability of attack 1,000 km from their bases to reach Egypt, while the Red Sea is 50–300 km wide outside Yemen. If they have such missiles, I suppose targets in Saudi Arabia are much more likely. –LPfi (talk) 08:43, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
 * I tried to look for how far they'd attack from the Houthi bases but Red Sea crisis has nothing about it. -- SHB2000  (talk | contribs | meta) 08:50, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Still, missile capable of 80 km are quite different from those capable of 1,000 km. I see no reason anybody would have given the latter kind to the Huthis and I doubt they even have the capability to operate them. If somebody gives such a missile to the Huthis, it would be for some specific operation, which would be totally independent of the current ship bombardment. –LPfi (talk) 10:08, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
 * @LPfi I was added such a warningbox to some Saudi Arabian city articles, but all reverted by, still, I would rather believe that at least Jeddah and Aqaba are more likely in dangerous status due to Houthi. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:25, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Or more likely, Djibouti is in dangerous. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:31, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
 * What's your evidence for that? Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:34, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
 * @Ikan Kekek ? Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:09, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
 * OK, that's about Saudi Arabia, not Djibouti. It would make sense to have a cautionbox in "Stay safe" for Asir and Hejaz, I guess. Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:22, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
 * And that cautionbox or warningbox should have relevant specific examples in it. Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:14, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

title: Talk:Red Sea Coast


text:
Talk:Red Wing

Red Wing is a beautiful river-town with lots of charm. Reminiscent of Stillwater, MN. As of 2006, Real-Estate prices have just begun to rise. New establishments in the last few years include: Super Wal-Mart, Target, Applebee's, Evergreen-8 Theater (stadium seating), HUGE Menards, Caribou Coffee, Starbucks. -Last Updated: 6/3/06

title: Talk:Red Wing


text: Talk:Regina

title: Talk:Regina


text:
Talk:Regional coding

Naming
I think the content in here is good, but there's gotta be a more comprehensible name for it? Also, parts of this overlap with Electrical systems, and should be moved from there to here. (WT-en) Jpatokal 11:16, 16 February 2008 (EST)

How current?
Most recent updates to this occur in 2008. A great deal of change has likely occurred since then. Can someone who knows update this...or if details remain current, at least give us some assurance? Regards, Hennejohn (talk) 19:34, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Recent edit
In this edit a paragraph was removed; the edit comment described it as an "anti-DRM rant". I disagree & want to put most of it back, though I'd eliminate the spurious dig "it's all about money spinning". I'm objecting only to the deletion here; the added text seems fine to me.

Other opinions? Pashley (talk) 08:39, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

 * I wrote that paragraph many years ago when we were still at Wikitravel. I would say go ahead and restore it. The dog2 (talk) 01:23, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

 * I restored it & edited some. Other opinions still needed. Pashley (talk) 04:44, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

 * I agree with the paragraph, but I understand the reaction. We don't have to pretend it is an anti-piracy feature, but we can try to write in a tone a little more neutral. I think that paragraph is fine now.

 * The added paragraph was is at least partly redundant with the paragraph now between the two, the former telling the same points from the companies' perspective. We don't have to say both "a movie may not be released on DVD in Australia for months [...]" and "could be released on DVD in the United States before it is exported [...]".

 * There is also the fundamental though fault: "Works can also be localized differently in different regions; a German-language dub may be seen in Europe but have little to no use in Australia." Just print "German version" on the cover, no DRM needed. Why can't they allow a German exchange student to watch their German dub in Australia?

 * –LPfi (talk) 17:03, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Video games
Are contemporary video games really tied to PAL/NTSC etc.? They are encodings for analogue television; who is playing games on analogue television sets these days? If you use any connector but the antenna one, you can connect the device to a computer display, which should be able to handle both 50 and 60 Hz with no problems, and probably any relevant resolution, regardless of region. Do even television sets lack support for those frequencies and resolutions? –LPfi (talk) 06:40, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

title: Talk:Regional coding


text:
Talk:Reims

Bad news no smoking???
get with the 21st century, buddy!

41.74.218.154 12:33, 4 August 2011 (EDT)

title: Talk:Reims


text:
Talk:Rein Guesthouse

DO NOT DELETE. User who recommended deleting, please explain! —The preceding comment was added by (WT-en) 157.157.235.183 (talk • contribs)

 * The explanation is at Project:Votes for deletion. You are free to contest the vfd on the vfd page, but I would suggest that you will not be successful, since our policy is very clear on this issue. The appropriate place for such an establishment, would be to list it in the appropriate city/town article. --(WT-en) Peter Talk 19:19, 28 March 2008 (EDT)

title: Talk:Rein Guesthouse


text:
Talk:Rejang River

Is this really a sensible/necessary region? (WT-en) Jpatokal 01:35, 11 January 2007 (EST)

 * Well, like the Kelabit Highlands, the Rejang River basin is quite a popular destination region. The page is not meant to be the river itself, but the basin it drains, and which it serves as the main transport artery. Points of interest include riverine towns like Sibu, Kapit, Belaga, and many smaller towns, numerous longhouses, the Pelagus rapids and controversially, the Bakun dam. There are also several hiking/off-road travelling opportunities - one being the Belaga-Tatau trip. I think each of these do not need separate pages but should be just gathered in the Rejang River page. But am open to contrary views. Cheers. 218.111.149.196 12:51, 11 January 2007 (EST)

 * A rename to Rejang River Basin would then be appropriate. --(WT-en) globe-trotter 19:33, 7 August 2010 (EDT)

See Sibu's Get In section for details.
This sentense isn't very usefule since the Get In section in the Sibu article is empty.

title: Talk:Rejang River


text:
Talk:Religious destinations of Kerala

What is this?
I don't think this is really a travel topic, but more a list of churches. They aren't actually "pilgrimages" as the article states, but just churches or temples or mosques to visit, all slapped together on one page. Shouldn't these things be covered in their respective destination articles? I can't think of any reason why all of this should be grouped together here in one pile. There is no special reason why Kerala needs to have a list-article-type approach to this. (WT-en) texugo 11:36, 31 October 2011 (EDT)

 * I think parts of it should be merged into Sacred sites of the Indian sub-continent, most of the rest to destination articles, perhaps some just scrapped. I have not inserted a merge tag yet, thought it better to seek other opinions first. Pashley (talk) 17:42, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I would support what Texugo suggested above. --Saqib (talk) 17:57, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

 * What should be done? Merged into the other articles as Pashley suggested? --Andrewssi2 (talk) 00:23, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

 * Sure. If you'd like to merge the material into other articles, by all means go ahead, and then redirect the article when you're done. Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:02, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

 * I see a merge tag was placed on this article, but the problem is, the merge tag suggests merging the article into Kerala. The Kerala article is already too long, and specific entries like these don't belong there, anyway. Instead, what should be done was suggested by Texugo and Pashley above. Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:31, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
 * That's the idea. I tried various strategies of trying to make the merge tag show something other than a link to a single article, and even considering substituting the template and manually changing what it says. Perhaps we need a dismantle tag? Texugo (talk) 01:45, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:Religious destinations of Kerala


text:
Talk:Remoulins

I moved the info from Le Pont du Gard to here. It seems like the aqueduct is near this town, so I think the attraction should be listed here. --(WT-en) Evan 16:36, 26 Sep 2004 (EDT)

title: Talk:Remoulins


text:
Talk:Ottawa Valley

Taverns listings
If it's OK to list these:

 * Finnegan's in Renfrew
 * The Lasso in Pembroke

Why is it not OK to list this?

 * Wilno Tavern in Wilno

The context is

"Bars known for hosting live country and rock music are:"

If you look at Wilno Tavern's site, they do host country music. So I think they should be listed, or perhaps none should be?

(WT-en) Ikan Kekek 18:52, 16 April 2011 (EDT)

It should be listed they have the best live music in the area, its mostly known for its live shows.

 * Really there should just be an overview here, with the individual listings in the city article containing the details. (WT-en) texugo 05:33, 22 April 2011 (EDT)

Ottawa Valley
We did have an article there, which was unfortunately rather touty and needed editing. It has now been redirected here.

No! The region name should be the Ottawa Valley. I'm from Ottawa; that is the name I know and that I would expect visitors to hear. Also, the region is somewhat broader than just Renfrew County.

As I see it, it is debatable whether we need the county article at all — I'm inclined to think not, but I'm not certain. However, it is obvious we should have something for the better-known region. Pashley (talk) 14:31, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

 * Agreed. Because Ottawa Valley technically already exists with an edit history (even if it's worthless CVB spam) it will be necessary to ask an admin to take that page out and shoot it in order to make way for a move of Renfrew County → Ottawa Valley. The other option would be to actually write a new page about the valley itself.
 * I've tried to rewrite and reorganise eastern Ontario a bit as the counties are indeed useless - most contain either nothing (an empty article template) or just a list of villages. Something like Leeds-Grenville makes no sense as a subregion as it is Gananoque (which is Kingston-adjacent) to Kemptville (which is Ottawa-adjacent). Put Gan in K'town and Kemptville in Bytown, they geographically have nothing much in common. K7L (talk) 14:55, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

 * I agree it should be called Ottawa Valley, as well. As long as you don't mind waiting a bit, I can take care of the deletion tonight when I get home.  It's done now (it's Friday, I'll just be later for work).
 * Does the Ottawa Valley article stretch to include a place like Bancroft, which is in northern Hastings County but has much more in common with the highlands part of the Ottawa Valley? -Shaundd (talk) 15:16, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

 * I've changed the lead to mention Ottawa Valley first, then Renfrew County and moved the page. I'm a little hesitant to include Bancroft as Hastings is Belleville (Ontario), although it's not going to be a clear fit anywhere as the beaten-path regions will either follow the Ottawa River (and the Trans-Canada Highway) or the Great Lakes/St. Lawrence seaway (along the Windsor-Quebec corridor and the US border). Bancroft is inland and not near much of anything except maybe Algonquin Park. K7L (talk) 15:58, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Highways
Current text has "Highway 60 from the west and highway 17 (the Trans-Canada Highway) from the northwest and southeast form the main routes in the region." What about 7, 15, and 416?

 * I think it depends on the boundaries of the region and I'm not entirely sure what they are right now. Currently, I think the region starts at Arnprior and heads northwest up the Ottawa River and west to include Renfrew Country. Should it include Ottawa, as well? There's a related discussion about subregions for Eastern Ontario currently going on at Talk:Eastern Ontario.  If you have any thoughts, please jump in. -Shaundd (talk) 15:54, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

 * Including Arnprior would be just enough to include 417 (which runs east-west from the Québec border to Arnprior) but would not include 416 (which runs north from Prescott-Ogdensburg to Bells Corners, Ottawa-Nepean). 15 *used* to end at Arnprior, but its numbering was changed back to 29 when that piece was demoted to county road status in 1998. Seven is likely too far south (Perth). K7L (talk) 02:57, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:22, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
 * The Eagle's Nest Trail.jpeg

title: Talk:Ottawa Valley


text:
Talk:Rennes

The page said :"However, a lot of the residents of Rennes rarely pay for the bus as there are rarely any ticket-checkers." This used to be true, but now your supposed to get in the bus from the front door, in front of the driver, and either show a ticket, or buy one. You can still try to cheat the system, but it is not any more a common practice, so I don't think it should be advertised, so I removed it.
 * Well, i've never been asked for a ticket by the driver. If the driver asked, then there'd be no need for the big controllers. Are you from Rennes perchance?

I lived in Rennes the past year and Ive noticed that unless your stop is the last one on the line in the middle of the night, you should really have a ticket. Ive gotten controlled many times before.

title: Talk:Rennes


text:
Talk:Reno

d00d! Nice start on this article. No wonder you're the King of Reno. -- (WT-en) Evan 08:41, 13 Aug 2003 (PDT)

Great start Sam! (WT-en) Majnoona

Video review
A video review added by an anonymous user who, according to the edit comment, "went here because of Wikivoyage". The link was removed from the main article in accordance with Project:External links:

 * * Jim Kelley's Nugget Diner, 233 North Virginia Street (in the back of the Nugget casino), 356-3300. Open 24/7. Home of the Awful Awful, one of the best burgers in the state.

Virginia City
Could this section be expanded?

Love the banner!
When I first look into an article, and this is just me, I can't help but look at the banner. Reno's banner gives an astounding picture of the Reno arch, and iconic symbol of the city. I think it can be better, through. There's almost nothing but the arch, not many lights in the back. Just saying. No need to change it, but I was just suggesting. DAZ14LPA (talk) 11:09, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item is missing permission
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item is missing permission information and may be deleted: You can see the details at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:38, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Grand-Sierra-Resort-hero-shot 1920x1080 (1).jpg

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:23, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Grand-Sierra-Resort-hero-shot 1920x1080 (1).jpg

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item is missing permission
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item is missing permission information and may be deleted: You can see the details at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:23, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Exterior 5 med.jpg
 * Reasonable. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 08:27, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * so should we remove this file for now? SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 08:29, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Am I wrong for thinking that since it's not viewable on the page, it doesn't matter much? Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:33, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Well, you can still see it on the map since it's written on the  variable. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 08:36, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Right. I just don't think that's so important. I could be wrong. But anyway, I think this photo is likely stolen, so we can't use it. Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:44, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * So removing for now. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 08:56, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Why do you think it was "stolen"? Why was it marked to need OTRS verification? Am I blind when I see no reason, neither in the template nor in the edit summaries. It does not look like a professional photo to me. If it was found elsewhere, a link should have been provided. –LPfi (talk) 08:52, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I may be assuming good faith to a fault. I contested the speedy deletion nomination just above this one, and the reason given was that that photo had been used in publicity for the casino, hotel or whatever and therefore it was probably stolen. Please feel free to contest this speedy deletion nomination and make the nominator give an argument. Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:00, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I reverted the template addition with a complaint on the user talk page. OTRS isn't needed for regular own photos, and the user hasn't been active for twelve years on Commons. Giving a week to send letters is unreasonable for old files. –LPfi (talk) 09:28, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Is it OK to just revert the template, rather than challenging the speedy deletion nomination and turning it into a regular deletion nomination? Is that within Commons rules? Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:07, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I don't know. I think not on principle, but adding a template with no justification is a hundred times less time-consuming than to start a DR by hand, refuting any justification the template adder might have had in mind, some of which might not be obvious. I'd treat such templates like we treat page creating vandalism: one should not delete articles on real places, but we do – until somebody tells me not to with a good reason or a credible threat. –LPfi (talk) 10:32, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:Reno