text:
Talk:Mamaia

Palm Beach Hotel
I added the following description. I've been staying at the hotel (May 2008) and tried to be fair. It's a nice place in need of improvements. I am writing this from the hotel internet connection itself, here near the beach in Mamaia.

"An American tourist staying multiple days describes the hotel as having an excellent location with fairly nice rooms in need of some repair and despite claiming 5-star status does not offer the quality of service expected of such a rating."

Hotels
I removed the following directory list from the article.

 * Accommodation at Vila Thetis, Tel. +40 726-226-138", mail office@thetis.ro, Web.
 * Hotel Delfin, Tel. 40 241-831-640, Fax 40 241-831-640.
 * Hotel Midia, Tel. 40 241-831-940.
 * Hotel Mioriţa, Tel. 40 241-831-956.
 * Hotel Olt, Tel. 40 241-831-745.
 * Hotel Alcor, Tel. 40 241-831-202, Fax 40 241-813-352.
 * Hotel Apollo, Tel. 40 241-831-816.
 * Hotel Astoria, Tel. 40 241-831-007, Fax 40 241-831-456.
 * Hotel Aurora, Tel. 40 241-831-044; Fax 40 241-831-280,.
 * Hotel Caraiman I, Tel. 40 241-831-213, Fax 40 241-813-088; [mailto:caraiman@eurosites.ro]
 * Pensiunea Casa Argeşeană, Sat de Vacanţă, Tel. 40 241-609-140.
 * Pensiunea Casa feciorii Vrancei, Sat de Vacanţă, Tel. 40 744-533-459.
 * Pensiunea Casa Harghita, Sat de Vacanţă, Tel. 40 241-513-738.
 * Pensiunea Casa Suceveană, Sat de Vacanţă, Tel. 40 722-271-268.
 * Hotel Dacia-Nord, Tel. 40 241-831-669.
 * Hotel Dacia-Sud, Tel. 40 241-831-812, Fax 40 241-831-811.
 * Hotel Delta, Tel. 40 241-831-965, Fax 40 241-831-965.
 * Hotel Doina, Tel. 40 241-831-815, Fax 40 241-831-815, [mailto:receptie@hoteldoina.ro],.
 * Hotel Dunărea, Tel. 40 241-617-984, Fax 40 241-831-077.
 * Pensiunea Eelmo, B-dul Mamaia, Nr. 136, Tel. 40 241-617-984.
 * Hotel Flora, Tel. 40 241-831-887, Fax 40 241-831-887.
 * Hotel Hefaistos, Tel. 40 241-831-564.
 * Hotel Histria, Tel. 40 788-402-396.
 * Hotel Holiday, Sat de Vacanţă, Tel. 40 241-559-906.
 * Hotel Jupiter Junona, Tel. 40 241-831-636; 40 241-831-667; Fax 40 241-831-797, [mailto:reservation@holidayresort.ro],.
 * Hotel Lotus, Tel. 40 241-831-746; Fax 40 241-831-147,.
 * Hotel Mercur, Tel. 40 241-831-252, Fax 40 241-831-348.
 * Hotel Metropol, Tel. 40 241-831-883, Fax 40 241-831-883.
 * Hotel Minerva, Tel. 40 241-831-350, Fax 40 241-831-348.
 * Hotel Modern, Tel. 40 241-831-975, Fax 40 241-831-903.
 * Hotel Naţional, Tel. 40 241-831-895.
 * Hotel Orfeu, Tel. 40 241-831-113, Fax 40 241-831-113.
 * Hotel Ovidiu, Tel. 40 241-831-590, Fax 40 241-831-590.
 * Hotel Patria], Tel. 40 241-831-055.
 * Hotel Pescăruş, Tel. 40 241-831-673, Fax 40 241-831-673.
 * Hotel Piccadilly, Tel. 40 241-831-129, Fax 40 241-831-884. [mailto:reservations@piccadilly.ro].
 * Hotel Promesse, Tel. 40 241-831-652, Fax 40 241-831-207.
 * Hotel Rodna, Tel. 40 241-831-958.
 * Hotel Select, Tel. 40 241-831-930, Fax 40 241-831-930.
 * Hotel Selena, Tel. 40 241-831-958.
 * Hotel Siret, Tel. 40 241-831-435, Fax 40 241-831-435.
 * Hotel Sulina, Tel. 40 241-831-447, Fax 40 241-831-596;.
 * Hotel Tomis, Tel. 40 241-831-682, Fax 40 241-831-646.
 * Hotel Unirea, Tel. 40 241-831-053.
 * Hotel Venus, Tel. 40 241-831-038, Fax 40 241-831-331;.
 * Vila Părăsită, Tel. 40 241-831-252, Fax 40 241-831-348.

Mid-range

 * Hotel Albatros, Tel. 40 241-831-381, Fax 40 241-831-346, [mailto:office@hotelalbatros.ro],.
 * Hotel Ambasador, Tel. 40 241-831-185,Fax 40 241-831-217.
 * Hotel Amiral, Tel. 40 241-831-135, Fax 40 241-831-135.
 * Hotel Briza, Tel. 40 241-831-012, Fax 40 241-831-012,.
 * Hotel Caraiman II, Tel. 40 241-831-213; Fax 40 241-831-088, [mailto:caraiman@eurosites.ro].
 * Hotel Central, Tel. 40 241-831-679, Fax 40 241-831-065.
 * Hotel Comandor, Tel. 40 241-831-138, Fax 40 241-831-149. [mailto:office.comandor@unita-turism.ro].
 * Hotel Condor, Str. Faleză, Tel. 40 241-831-906; Fax 40 241-831-906
 * Hotel Dorna, Tel. 40 241-831-639, Fax 40 241-831-639, [mailto:dorna@blackseahotels.ro]
 * Hotel Insula Ovidiu, Tel. 40 241-252-494, Fax 40 241-522-102.
 * Hotel Lido, Tel. 40 241-831-555, Fax 40 241-831-555.
 * Hotel Parc, Tel. 40 241-831-326, Fax 40 241-831-198, [mailto:hotel-parc@fx.ro],.
 * Hotel Pelican, Str. Faleză, Tel. 40 241-831-051, Fax 40 241-831-658, [mailto:cpp_2004@yahoo.com].
 * Hotel Perla, Tel. 40 241-831-995, Fax 40 241-831-731, [mailto:perla@rdslink.ro], [mailto:perla@pmg.ro],.
 * Hotel Riviera, Tel. 40 241-831-230, Fax 40 241-831-019, [mailto:riviera@ra.ro].
 * Hotel Vega, Tel. 40 241-831-141, Fax 40 241-831-307.
 * Hotel Victoria, Tel. 40 241-831-028, Fax 40 241-831-024,.
 * Hotel Victory, Tel. 40 241-931-153, Fax 40 241-831-253.

Splurge

 * Hotel Aquarium, Tel. 40 241-831-059, Fax 40 241-831-889.
 * Hotel Bavaria Blu, Tel. 40 241-831-443, Fax 40 241-831-443, [mailto:office@bavariablu.ro],.
 * Hotel Best Western Savoy, Tel. 40 241-831-426, Fax 40 241-931-266,.
 * Hotel Coral Beach, Tel. 40 241-831-022,,  [mailto:coral.beach@pmg.ro coral.beach@pmg.ro].
 * Hotel Iaki, Tel. 40 241-831-025, Fax 40 241-831-169;.
 * Hotel Majestic, Tel. 40 241-831-005, Fax 40 241-831-981,, [mailto:majestic.mamaia@pmg.ro].
 * Hotel Palas, Tel. 40 241-831-051, Fax 40 241-831-658, [mailto:cpp_2004@yahoo.com].
 * Hotel Yourhotels Caraiman, Tel. 40 241-831-213, Fax 40 241-831-088.
 * Club Scandinavia, Tel. 40 241-607-000, Fax 40 241-607-001,.
 * Hotel Mamaia, Tel. 40 241-831-100, Fax 40 241-831-546, Web.
 * Hotel Rex, Tel. 40 241-831-520; Fax 40 241-831-690.

title: Talk:Mamaia


text:
Talk:Mamallapuram

I made the changes attributed here to 61.246.59.206. Feel free to post concerns to my Talk page. (WT-en) ChrisC 16:26, 6 August 2006 (EDT)

Wine
Current text, under Drink, includes:
 * No government-run TASMAC wine shop is available in town; to buy alcohol you must drive around 2 km out from Mamallapuram.

Can we add directions? Which way should one drive?

Perhaps create a listing (here or under Buy?) for the place you drive to? Pashley (talk) 01:09, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Talk:Mamallapuram


text:
Talk:Mammoth Lakes

This discussion moved here from the Travellers' pub:

I created Mammoth which covers both Mammoth Mountain (a ski area) and Mammoth Lakes (city at the base of the ski area). Is it a good idea for me to make a redirect pages from Mammoth Mountain to Mammoth? And if so, how do I get into the editor to do it? Do I just make a fake link Mammoth Mountain and then follow it, or is there a way to do it without linking to the redirect page? -- (WT-en) Colin 11:57, 6 May 2004 (EDT)

 * You would have to make the link before the page can exist, or use WWW::Mediawiki::Client to make the page. Making the link is the easier way to do it, especially considering you've already done it in the preceeding paragraph.  The question of the naming of the Mammoth and Mammoth Mountain pages is right is an editorial question about which I have no opinion whatever.  Maybe somebody else out there does? -- (WT-en) Mark 05:17, 7 May 2004 (EDT)

 * Question: If you visit Mammoth Mountain where do you go to catch the plane, eat, drink, or sleep afterwards? - If it is generally somewhere else close by then Mammoth Mountain is most likely an attraction rather than a destination. As I interpret the general policy about articles; individual attractions, (such as a skifield) should only have a separate article if they are a long way from a city or town and are a separate destination in their own right. The city of Mammoth Lakes could be an article because it is (presumably) a population centre with things to do, see and places to stay, eat and drink at. It currently sounds like Mammoth Mountain is an attraction, not a destination. In that case Mammoth Mountain should be listed under the Do section in the regional Mammoth article (and Mammoth Lakes city article, if created). If an article about Mammoth Mountain can fill up all the different sections in the small city template and not become trivial, that could justify it as being a separate article. I suggest putting everything in the Mammoth article first, then if it gets too full and detailed it can then be split up. Having a lot of information about a bigger region on one page is better for the traveller than having little isolated bits spread over several pages. -- (WT-en) Huttite 20:34, 7 May 2004 (EDT)

Should this article be called Mammoth Lakes?
Should this article be called Mammoth Lakes rather than simply Mammoth. Is it is about a city called Mammoth Lakes or does the Mammoth region exist as a separate county or larger district? It is linked from the Mammoth Lakes link in the Eastern Sierra section. Thus I would expect to find Mammoth Lakes as the article title. Mammoth should appear in the Eastern Sierra section of the Eastern Sierra page. Just something else to consider. - (WT-en) Huttite 20:34, 7 May 2004 (EDT)

 * Okay, after considering this a bit, I've decided I was wrong about this all, and we should rename this page to Mammoth Lakes. For the sake of completeness, here's what I was thinking originally, and why I was wrong:

 * Originally I was worried that Travellers to Mammoth Lakes might type just "Mammoth", as it is popularly known, or might type "Mammoth Mountain" since their main goal was skiing. I wanted all three to point to the same place.

 * This is wrong first because under the general rule, this should be called Mammoth Lakes after the name of the city. Second, if we follow the general rule, although typing Mammoth Mountain into Wikivoyage search won't immediatly pop up the right article, it will at least bring up search results which will lead the user to the right place.  So good enough. -- (WT-en) Colin 13:38, 8 May 2004 (EDT)

 * Since MAJ, the usually keeper of the sleep rule is on the road, I'll say it. The rule of thumb for what is or isn't a destination is "Do you sleep there?".  I think that's pretty much the result we've gotten here right? Putting my own hat back on I'll toss in my regular complaint that hardly anybody puts in any acutally information about where you'd sleep once you get there. ;) -- (WT-en) Mark 04:28, 9 May 2004 (EDT)

title: Talk:Mammoth Lakes


text:
Talk:Manali

how should i go from jammu to manali or kulu which route is best

I also has same query .. how do i go from delhi to manali of kullu .. and which is the best route ..

haiii
how do i go manali from delhi airport.. . ?

hi,,
from you can take bus service which will take around 12 hours journey. vlovo ac bus also available in this route. otherwise you take flight from delhi to kullu. from kullu, manali onliy 20km. —The preceding comment was added by 210.212.92.195 (talk • contribs)

It is improper information, ...I must rectify it

Volvo Bus services are available from Janpath New Delhi and buses depart 5.30 - 6.00 PM and it reach early Morning IT TAKES 14 HOURS if the roads are clear and climate is fine.

State buses are also available from Interstate bus stand but those are ordinary or delux coaches

from : KULLU to manali is about 40 kms. And Delhi to Manali is 465 KMS. by road

—The preceding comment was added by (WT-en) Sushil chhabra (talk • contribs)

hi
from kulu is best route. otherwise delhi ..

Hello..
I wanted to know the season in June second week, will I get some snowfall. While coming to Manali from Ambala Cantt do I easily get bus services.

Hi
May I know that, Is Rohatang Pass opened for tourists on the first wk of november and is it fine to visit manali at this time...... —The preceding comment was added by 125.18.49.67 (talk • contribs)

Yes Manali Is very fine in the month of NOVEMBER but must take heavy woolens Caps Handgloves Socks Jackets alongwith you because it is very cold during Nov-DEC- JAN - FEB-MARCH  Months.

During this heavy snowfalls accured some times and it is closed for the ordinary men,Even if the Rohtang pass is not opened that time you may enjoy MARHI which is few KMS before station and a lovely spot for Lunch break or sip a coffe few restaurans remain open during this

another sight SOLANG Valley is also on this way which is good for the tourists for PARA GLIDING

—The preceding comment was added by (WT-en) Sushil chhabra (talk • contribs)

-- is the July month recommended to go 4 manali N shimala?? —The preceding comment was added by 61.12.58.24 (talk • contribs)

Ex links
Some of the useful sites might be useful for the visitors

 * Manali Tourism Info How to reach Manali, tourist attractions and more.
 * Official Website Himachal Pradesh Official website.

—The preceding comment was added by 1.22.32.52 (talk • contribs)

 * The official website for Manali should simply be linked to the word "Manali" at the beginning of the article. I have done this. The other link you've posted is commercial and violates this site's policy on listings of and links to tour agency sites.

 * I've moved this section to the bottom of the page, since it's the new section. If you'd like to reply, please reply below and sign your post with 4 tildes (Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:33, 31 March 2014 (UTC)) before pressing "Enter." Thanks a lot. Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:33, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:Manali


text:
Talk:Manama

first image of city
in the other pic further down the page has a description under the pic this one doesnt have one maybe you know what a good description would be it looks like the skyline to me. (WT-en) Gullsofpeace 10:35, 20 October 2009 (EDT)
 * well the skyline with skyscrapers also a marina it looks like... (WT-en) Gullsofpeace 10:41, 20 October 2009 (EDT)
 * Looks great now Burmese gj. (WT-en) Gullsofpeace 11:06, 20 October 2009 (EDT) and thank you. (WT-en) Gullsofpeace 11:06, 20 October 2009 (EDT)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:38, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Pearl diver sculpture in Bahrain National Museum.jpg

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:50, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Al Fateh Grand Mosque A 224.jpg

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:44, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
 * G310s bqan 2009 t.jpg

Featured destination?
What would this article need to become a featured destination? Would it be a Destination of the Month, or Off the Beaten Path? /Yvwv (talk) 23:48, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:37, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Manama-nightview.jpg

 * Deletion reason: CC-BY-NC-ND license on Flickr. We could use it with a warning that anyone using it for commercial purposes is in violation of the license and does so at their own risk. It's a nice photo and it's on the page. Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:44, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

title: Talk:Manama


text:
Talk:Manaslu

Merge
An anonymous user removed the merge tag from this article. Typically Wikivoyage doesn't do articles on mountains - see Project:What is an article (note: we have region articles named after mountains, but the articles aren't about the mountain). This article might make an interesting itinerary article about a specific trek, but it would be helpful if the person working on it could first review Project:What is an article (example: "potassium permanganate" is not one) and a few of the existing Nepal trek articles so that the formatting is consistent. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 14:41, 13 April 2010 (EDT)

A decent wikivoyage site would have information about any major trek.

Copied from my talk page: --(WT-en) Burmesedays 22:21, 13 April 2010 (EDT)

What?? What you also propose merging Everest information into the Alps? Manaslu and Annapurna are DIFFERENT locations mate.80.3.26.54 14:17, 13 April 2010 (EDT)

 * As a general point, being constructive when trying to sort out an issue pays more dividends than pointless sarcasm. But that aside, if you look at the Wikivoyage definition of Annapurna (a region, not just the mountain), I think Manaslu is very close, if not inside that region?. I was not sure though, which is why I suggested in the edit note (I think you can only put one potential merge destination in the merge template) an alternative merge with Himalayas (Nepal). Given that Wikivoyage does not typically have articles about mountains, if you know the Manaslu trek well, please do go ahead and write about it in the appropriate article. Thanks. --(WT-en) Burmesedays 22:21, 13 April 2010 (EDT)

VFD Discussion
Am I right? That Mountains and hills aren't appropriate for being an article but National parks are an exception? This article makes me think it's kind of preview for the book listed in the reference section (-.-)
 * Delete? - (WT-en) SnappyHip 10:08, 14 April 2010 (GST)

 * The content reads very like something copied from a book I agree. I am not sure if Manaslu merits an article or not, and there is a discussion on the talk page about where the content might be merged. Generally, you are right that we do not have articles about mountains unless they are major attractions or national parks.--(WT-en) Burmesedays 02:38, 14 April 2010 (EDT)

 * Delete and redirect - The fact that the text references specific pages from a book leads me to believe it is probably not compatible with our copyleft. Redirect to the region, and later if enough information appears to overburden that article we can think about giving it its own page at that time. (WT-en) Texugo 13:01, 14 April 2010 (EDT)

Result: Merge template added for Annapurna. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 21:53, 21 May 2010 (EDT)

title: Talk:Manaslu


text:
Talk:Manassas

Unless I'm missing something, there's no need for the "(Virginia)" disambiguator. There is only one city by this name, and Manassas National Battlefield, while an interesting place, is an attraction, not a destination. This should be moved to just Manassas, and I will do so unless someone comes up with a reason not to. -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 17:48, 9 July 2006 (EDT)

Sudley Road
Regarding this edit, the shopping artery of of Sudley Road is almost entirely outside of Manassas. The main shopping artery of Manassas itself would be Centreville Road (Route 28) or maybe Liberia Avenue. Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 00:55, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

 * While that might be true in a legal, technical sense, on Wikivoyage the traveler comes first. This means we don't adhere strictly to city limits, for example. Instead, the division between articles should be based on the amount of content. Big cities get broken up in to district articles, whereas rural regions with only a handful of towns might have a region article and nothing else. (Look at any printed travel guide and you'll see that they do the same thing.) So, if Sudley Road is the main shopping area that people in Manassas go to, then that's where this article should recommend going. And if it turns out that the division between Manassas and neighboring towns is not very clear or meaningful for travelers, then maybe at some point it can be proposed to merge some articles together. --Bigpeteb (talk) 13:25, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

 * I mosey agree. I don't see why we shouldn't cover Greater Manassas, but we shouldn't call any of the cities of Greater Manassas "Manassas" (aside from Manassas itself). Calling Yorkshire (for example) "Manassas" would be like calling Alexandra "Washington DC", it's incorrect and confusing. Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 14:24, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

 * To the best of my knowledge, the only city arguably in Greater Manassas we have an article on is Centreville, and even then it's only southern Centreville that's arguably in Greater Manassas. That division between Manassas and neighboring cities isn't too meaningful, and not clear to even allot of locals. Old Town aside, over half the things referred to in this article are outside of Manassas. The best approach might be to define the scope of this article as Greater Manassas. This isn't a rural regions situation, but it does strike me as being similar to one. Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 18:52, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

 * How about we just call this page "Greater Manassas", and make it scope Manassas and the suburbs of Manassas (Manassas Park, Yorkshire, Signal Hill, etc.). Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 15:54, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

 * In the absence of any objections I'll do that. Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 23:26, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

 * Normally it's okay to refer to a region by its major city; it's a little weird not to have an article on Manassas and redirect searchers to what looks like a region article. Powers (talk) 15:23, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
 * I agree. This should be moved back to Manassas. Texugo (talk) 15:34, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The thing is, these are distinct areas with their own identity. Manassas is the most central and most prominent of those areas' but it's only one of them. We don't want to call any of these area's, except for Manassas itself, "Manassas", it's far too confusing. Manassas does have some residential areas that, while outside the city limits, are for all piratical (non-legal) purposes part of Manassas, but that's not what I'm referring to here. It's not piratical to restrict the scope of this page to Manassas, people far to rotenely travel between (say) Yorkshire and Manassas, or Manass and the Sudley Area, to not cover them in the same guide. If it helps, think of it like the boroughs of New York City on a smaller scale; you would not call The Bronx "Manhattan". As for the region thing, firstly for piratical purposes this "region" is basically a city, secondly the lead makes it clear that the scope includes Manassas, how's it confusing. We are referring to the "region" by its major city anyway, so I don't see the problem.
 * We aren't trying to "restrict the scope of this page to Manassas". It can still talk about and include the surrounding areas. But the name of the article still should be only "Manassas". This is not NYC, but a small town, and we very regularly include surrounding areas in guides for small towns, rather than include small towns in guides for their surrounding areas, as you seem to be doing. Texugo (talk) 21:03, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

 * I was just using NYC as an example to illustrate my point about terminology. Bigpeteb above said "While that might be true in a legal, technical sense [...] we don't adhere strictly to city limits", but part of my point is this isn't about city limits (there are parts of Manassas outside city limits and parts of not-Manassas outside city limits). It's not that I be leave the title should necessarily be "Greater Manassas". I don't think we should mislead the traveler by impaling that these distinct areas are Manassas, but at the same time I don't this should be littered with disclaimers about what is and isn't Manassas.

 * When I found this about half the stuff mentioned here wasn't in Manassas, and much more seaorisly everything listed under Do's "made the news" part was clearly implied to be in Manassas, when about half of it wasn't. I added disclaimers for when things happened in the other areas, but that littering with disclaimers didn't look very good. The point of renaming this "Greater Manassas" was so that we didn't need to worry at all about what was and wasn't Manassas.

 * Put simply I'd like this article to be able to freely cover all the distinct areas that make up Greater Manassas, without misleading the traveler into thinking that they are part of Manassas (and without the article tiptoeing around the term "Manassas"), if some wording change to the lead (under a "Manassas" title) has that effect, I'm happy. If it makes any difference, Manassas, let alone Greater Manassas, is very very far from being a small town. It certainly isn't NYC, but Manassas alone is 10 square miles, and that figure only counts the area within city limits. It's 5 miles from the western end of the Sudley area to Signal Hill, and 7 miles from Bristow to the northern border of Yorkshire, and almost everything along those two paths is urban/suburban. This isn't like a small town with a few attractions in its surrounding rural area.

 * That's just not how we do things. If it were, there would be several thousand more non-metropolitan destinations with "greater" in their title, but there isn't and there shouldn't be, because it's misleading and makes it sound like a populous metropolitan city region when it's just a spot of countryside. Nearby attractions are always covered in the city they are most closely associated with. It is not important to the traveller whether something is or isn't technically within Manassas city limits — what matters is that we tell them clearly how to get to each place, and that we cover it in the nearest logical destination. Texugo (talk) 23:35, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

 * I think there might be a bit of a misunderstanding here, I'm not demanding that "greater" remain in the title, and this isn't about what is or isn't technically within Manassas city limits. ̴̴

 * (edit conflict) Since the move has turned out to be controversial, I have moved it back to Manassas. Hope not to offend; it's just the standard practice when a change is contested that we revert to the previous way while we discuss a way forward. I hope you can understand. Texugo (talk) 23:54, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Well, then I guess we do have a misunderstanding -- if it's not to prevent moving the article back to Manassas, what is it you are after? Texugo (talk) 23:54, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
 * I am pretty tired today, I'm probably just not explaining my position well. Maybe we should pick this up after I get some sleep, but for now, suffice to say that the "Greater Manassas" title was only a means to an end and not an end in and of itself; I'm certainly open to other means of achieving that end. Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 00:09, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Well, as I perceive it so far, it looks like you should be able to pursue your end just fine without crossing over into anything too out-of-the-ordinary, but yeah, let's see how it looks on the morrow. Texugo (talk) 00:13, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
 * You've mostly already achieved that end, I don't think there's anything left to discuss. Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 03:53, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Also about the bobit thing, the link didn't show up properly in the edit summery, so here it is: w:Talk:John_and_Lorena_Bobbitt Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 00:59, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

title: Talk:Manassas


text:
Talk:Manassas (Virginia)

Unless I'm missing something, there's no need for the "(Virginia)" disambiguator. There is only one city by this name, and Manassas National Battlefield, while an interesting place, is an attraction, not a destination. This should be moved to just Manassas, and I will do so unless someone comes up with a reason not to. -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 17:48, 9 July 2006 (EDT)

title: Talk:Manassas (Virginia)


text:
Talk:Manaus

''This page is for discussing the corresponding article or guide. For more about using talk pages check out Project:Using talk pages.''

Tour operators
Nearly the entire "Do" section of this article is a mass of undifferentiated links to tour operators — not terribly helpful to anyone. There's not a single one of them that complies with the tour policy, especially with the lack of any contact details, but I'd rather not wipe out the whole section if there's something useful in there... does anybody have even a slight familiarity with Manaus that could help improve the section rather than eliminate it? — (WT-en) D. Guillaime 15:49, 26 November 2010 (EST)

 * I sure don't, but I'm wondering now, with the editing war that's taking place, whether the seeming participant and the competitors they're attacking should all be deleted. I can't think of another equally good solution. What's your opinion? (WT-en) Ikan Kekek 22:45, 31 January 2012 (EST)
 * Delete'em all, I say, there's been too much confusion and edit wars in this page (and the Portuguese version as well) and there's no fool-proof way to check on the agencies' backgrounds. There has never been anything *useful* about these listings, most of them are just phone numbers and directions "close to hotel x", "inside hostel y" and so on. I say: eliminate'em all. 189.6.36.42 14:17, 8 April 2012 (EDT)
 * I recently restored such a deletion because it was a seemingly spiteful act by a frustrated tour agency touter, but if we reach a consensus on deleting all tour listings, I would go along with that without hesitation. (WT-en) Ikan Kekek 20:02, 8 April 2012 (EDT)

I think my tour company should be accept on wikivoyage since we are reccomended in guide books and have all papers as a tour operator in Manaus,i can understand why,you guys want deleted as in Manaus there are many touts and it is true there are lot of website listed in Manaus page but these guys are most resellers and touts,you will find them every where in Manaus bus station airport and etc..... I have list of reference my tour company and e-mail address of people they have been in our jungle tour.

 * Whoever you are, promoting your tour company, it will be fruitful for the discussion if you identify yourself. If someone has deleted an entry you have made, they most probably did so because you were in breach of Wikivoyage's policy. A look at the history of the article might provide a clue.--(WT-en) Mariusm98 12:05, 11 April 2012 (EDT)

Jungle accommodation
I am trying to do a clean-up of the sleep-section. Too many jungle lodgings there. I feel (don't know the exact policy...) they shouldn't be in this article at all. They are not in Manaus, after all. But then again, where do they belong? Suggestions?--(WT-en) Mariusm98 10:43, 6 April 2012 (EDT)

 * Businesses should only be in the article for the town / park / district in which they are located, so if there is a town or park article for the lodging then that would be the place to move them. If the lodges really are out in the jungle, and there is no Wikivoyage article that covers the area in which they are located, do you have a suggestion of how best these could be handled?  Businesses are occasionally listed in region articles when they are in the middle of nowhere, but I'm not sure if that's applicable here. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 11:43, 6 April 2012 (EDT)

 * I made an initial attempt, although I realize that rivers are not appropriate destinations. They should probably be sub-sections of the municipalities they (or their most popular stretches) belong to, as I did with Iraduba/Ariau. Unfortunately I don't know the local geography well enough. But I think we have made some progress from the chaos that was the Manaus Sleep-section.--(WT-en) Mariusm98 09:14, 9 April 2012 (EDT)

Stay Healthy
I am not a doctor, so I do not have the knowledge to say one way or the other, but I have travel quite extensively in Africa, and have take many regimes of Anti Malarial drugs. To my understanding the drugs are only efficient if the regime is started a week before and continued a week after. You can't just take them if symptoms appear, that's not how malaria works, and the best treatment for malaria is to not get malaria, once you have symptoms you have it. Because of this I think this advice statement needs to be removed from this article, as this is dangerous and reckless advice!

"Also, some doctors, following a more modern line, have been recommending tourists to carry the drugs but to only take them if symptoms arise, as this is efficient enough." —The preceding comment was added by 2602:306:806c:d150:f1e2:f6a5:9f78:a884 (talk • contribs)

 * Please plunge forward are remove this, and you can refer to this discussion in your edit summary (which you can type in the "Summary" line that you'll see below your edit screen). Also, welcome to Wikivoyage! On talk pages, it's customary to "sign" posts by typing 4 tildes (~) in a row at the end of each post, just so that it's easy to keep track of who wrote what. Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:46, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
 * This was also the advice I got for travelling in the Peruvian Amazon last year from my travel doctor -- start a week before and continue after. Ground Zero (talk) 21:36, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Back in the 70s, when Fansidar (spelling?) was recommended, we had to start 3 weeks before we went to Malaysia (which is mostly malaria-free now). Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:25, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

title: Talk:Manaus


text:
Talk:Manú National Park

Should Manu Biosphere Reserve be merged with Manu National Park?

title: Talk:Manú National Park