text:
Talk:Budapest/East Pest

 * The borders between this and other districts of Budapest is defined in Talk:Budapest. Please review them when adding a new attraction or a listing item to this article.

To Do List

 * See: House of Hungarian Wine, please provide information about this attraction (if it is in Pest) that I read about a brochure from the Hungarian govt. Thanks. 202.73.127.252 12:24, 3 March 2007 (EST)
 * Moved this to Castle Hill todo list, as the House of Hungarian Wine belongs there. --(WT-en) DenisYurkin 06:01, 4 March 2007 (EST)

 * See and Do: Prices, please provide more prices for the many attractions and activities. Thanks again! 202.73.127.252 12:24, 3 March 2007 (EST)

price ranges for Restaurants / Sleep?
What price ranges are assumed as Budget / Mid-range / Splurge in Restaurants? In Sleep section? I am about to add few more venues, but don't know where to place them. Please help. --(WT-en) DenisYurkin 18:04, 6 January 2007 (EST)

lets merge district articles back into Budapest
I have initiated a discussion on merging all (or some) of Budapest district articles (Buda, Pest, Castle Hill) back into Budapest article.

We need opinions of active contributors to the Budapest district articles -- please share your opinions there. Thank you. --(WT-en) DenisYurkin 04:05, 8 January 2007 (EST)

Mátyás Pince tourist trap
''> Mátyás Pince: ... Tourist trap alert!''

What exactly makes it a tourist trap? --(WT-en) DenisYurkin 16:05, 27 November 2007 (EST)

LightEvolution
I have deleted that Dora Berkes Light Installation - Advertisement ? —The preceding comment was added by (WT-en) 78.92.86.247 (talk • contribs)

 * No, it's not an advertisement--but a genuine recommendation, it's really worth seeing in its season. --(WT-en) DenisYurkin 16:46, 20 June 2008 (EDT)

editing sections and no TOC
I am not sure what the problem is in this article, but when I try to edit sections it takes to another sections edit page. Also there is no table of contents. Anyone who knows the system and MediaWiki better than me, please help out so more users can utilize this page as well as help edit. Thanks. (WT-en) Carson 14:43, 1 August 2008 (EDT)

 * I fixed few characters, seem to work now. Let us know if you still have problems with this. --(WT-en) DenisYurkin 20:23, 6 August 2008 (EDT)

Status of this article
I put it down to usable as there is no Get in or Get out information. An understand section would be helpful as well. I would imagine somebody who knows Buddapest well could very easily complete these missing sections. There was also a large amount of apartment listing spam which I removed leaving only those with physical addresses that match the apartments they are renting. --(WT-en) Burmesedays 04:01, 5 November 2009 (EST)

 * If someone who knows Budapest could just write simple Get in and Get out sections, then this will be a guide without question I think. Shame to see the article languishing for such easily-remedied reasons.--(WT-en) Burmesedays 23:12, 20 November 2009 (EST)

Deleted route symbol
Apparently Image:BKV_villamos_symbol.svg, which is used in the article like 50 times, has been deleted on commons. I don't know if the image contained information which needs to be replaced in text form before removing the redlinks, or if we can replace it with a different symbol, but something needs to be done to fix it. The same goes for Budapest/Óbuda as well. Texugo (talk) 17:08, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

 * I think that it could just be replaced with "tram", as we don't have a symbol in the article for bus. Alternatively we could use BKV villamos.svg File:BKV villamos.svg. AlasdairW (talk) 20:56, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

 * Agree with AlasdairW using BKV villamos.svg for tram and maybe we can use this BKV busz.svg for bus. Globetrotter19 (talk) 08:16, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

 * Is that one derived from the one that was deleted? If so, isn't it likely to be deleted in the future for the same reason? Anyway, for generic trams/buses, I'm leaning toward the text approach. Any city over a certain size will have trams or buses, so unless we are using an official symbol used on the ground locally, we'd just be idiosyncratically choosing to show buses a certain way in this one city, for no particular reason and with no consistent system of doing so for other cities. I don't really see a particular reason why we would need icons for generic bus/tram/car/boat/taxi, but if we do decide they really are needed, I would prefer an approach where we talk about how they should be used across all pages, arrive at a consistent set that can be used throughout the site, and then template them rather than calling the image in full file syntax every time. Texugo (talk) 11:21, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

 * On reflection, I think that we would be best with the text. Moving away from the screen the bus and tram symbols start to look the same, before I have difficulty reading the text. Assuming that the symbols appear on stops etc, then they could go once in Budapest. (Both symbols have been on commons for a few years and are used on 500+ pages, so may not be so likely to be deleted.) AlasdairW (talk) 15:39, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
 * BKV_villamos_symbol.svg has been deleted for copyviol. The above suggested alternative cannot be deleted (are just generic icons). FYI On it:voy we have started to import&translate this article, and there I've decided to replace it with plain text "Tram", I think is the most reasonable choice, because without an official logo, there's no reason why a certain article should use a generic icon while the others don't. -- Andyrom75 (talk) 17:18, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Texugo I've performed the same change that you have made on all the other articles that used that image. Now the en:voy articles are clean, and this icon is linked just on the talk pages. -- Andyrom75 (talk) 06:48, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Metro icons
To gain the following benefits: I suggest to add to each icon a description, that will appear on "regular layout" only on tooltip, and the text is shown only in the absence of the relevant image.
 * 1) avoid future issues on deleted icons (I mean, doubt on what to do/write)
 * 2) increase readibility for those users that don't download pictures
 * 3) improve SEO

See the change that I've applied in the WIP article on it:voy. IMO this approach should be followed for each icon. -- Andyrom75 (talk) 06:48, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:Budapest/East Pest


text:
Talk:Bude

Here's a [[Project:External links|non-primary] source link for anyone who wants to add accomidations: [[User:(WT-en) Maj|(WT-en) Majnoona]] 11:21, 5 May 2006 (EDT)

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Talk:Bude


text:
Talk:Budget travel

Budget travel vs Zero-budget travel
The scope of this article is very divergent. The average traveller could use the advice for multi-use transit tickets and hostels, the paragraphs about finding food in the rubbish bin or sleeping in the street, seem a bit extreme. We could focus on mainstream advice here, and move the hard-core saving tips to a new article named zero-budget travel or similar. /Yvwv (talk) 17:00, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
 * An extraction of the most radical advice is done at minimum budget travel. Let's see if it amounts to a useful article. /Yvwv (talk) 14:33, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Single-use cameras
I do not think we should promote single-use cameras here. The ones I know have very limited capacity, and on a journey you do not know when you have the most fascinating view, so you want to be able to take many pictures. I suppose a used film camera can be had for not much more than the single-use one, the quality is probably much better even for cheap ones, and film should be on sale in more places than a replacement single-use camera. --LPfi (talk) 12:44, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Good point. /Yvwv (talk) 11:47, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

To do

 * Move non-financial advice about cycling to a more suitable article
 * How to find a reasonably cheap hotel
 * Border shopping /Yvwv (talk) 12:54, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

 * I think border tourism might easily become its own article or maybe a section in border crossing Hobbitschuster (talk) 12:58, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

 * Nearly all of the advice on cycling here is financial or integrated with financial arguments. On the other hand Financial issues are relevant also for traveller on a less tight budget, and none of the advice here is really radical. I think one should first add points that are missing from the other articles, and try to develop them into a good structure. Only then is it easy to see what points are easily found in those articles and what should be repeated here. --LPfi (talk) 13:56, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

 * Comparing the get around subsections, the section on biking seems about the right length. I think cutting down on it is not a priority. Redundant info could of course be removed for things not yet said. --LPfi (talk) 14:02, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

How to have a high-end vacation on a budget
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/12/travel/luxury-vacation-for-less.html —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:50, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

Questionable additions at Budget travel / Minimum budget travel
Just look at their revision histories. I have thus far reverted, but would like to step away from this and would like an additional set of eyeballs. To me those additions seem very clearly not in line with our way of writing travel content, but I could not very well put it into words or policies... Certainly the linking to aggregators is at the very least a grey area and probably more in the realm of "frowned upon"... Hobbitschuster (talk) 21:53, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Doesn't look great to me either. I can see the user's intent, but it's a bit sweeping and the grammar/writing really leaves stuff to be desired. Good revert, would've made it if I were the one on Recent Changes. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 23:07, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Flightnavigator has now made quite a strong accusation in an edit summary: "If you want to start a discussion, you can do so on the Talk page. I have the right to add helpful content for the travellers. And I will so as long as you call my content "stuff". Are you working for the tourism industry in a high price country?" Vaticidalprophet (talk) 01:09, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Let's not get ahead of ourselves. It can be frustrating for new users to see their edits reverted. I notice no one has actually taken time out to explain to him our policy against using aggregators. A message on his user talk page might help him understand why he's being reverted. Hopefully he'll be gracious about it, and let's wait to see if he is before we start getting confrontational. -- AndreCarrotflower (talk) 02:24, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Agree with Andre, here. SHB2000 (talk)  05:24, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Full disclosure, I worked for an airport pre-pandemic and plan to do so again, but I can't see how that's in any way relevant. Hobbitschuster (talk) 12:22, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

FYI: Vacation alternatives for the budget-conscious
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/31/travel/affordable-vacation-alternatives.html —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:33, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

 * We present some of the ideas in Budget travel, although not with such examples. We should probably include a few paragraphs on the theme (why is there nothing about local travel and travelling more seldom and staying longer instead?) also in Responsible travel. –LPfi (talk) 11:21, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

 * The GDP column of Retiring_abroad/Table has one indicator of costs for various countries. Should this be linked from other articles? Generalised in some way to make it more useful for folk other than retirees? Pashley (talk) 14:11, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

 * Retiring abroad, local wealth and the associated cost of living can be a good approximation on your own cost of living there (with some biasing issues dealt with in the article). For the tourist, costs of transport and lodging often dominate, and the correlation between those and local approximate wealth is less clear (this was discussed in the context of the Nordic countries a few years ago). A problem shared with those moving abroad for a long time, is that low prices for services often correlate with a need to care about security, with associated costs (considered in the table through the GPI and SPI indexes). There is valuable information in the table, but I am not sure it is easily used in other articles. –LPfi (talk) 10:59, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

title: Talk:Budget travel


text:
Talk:Budva

Budva is an Albanian's Ibiza.

title: Talk:Budva


text:
Talk:Buenos Aires

Wow! Talk about a great start! --(WT-en) Evan 06:37, 6 Apr 2004 (EDT)

Hey, thanks!!! Seems you are watching closely :-) (WT-en) Eclipse 06:49, 6 Apr 2004 (EDT)

Sushi in Buenos Aires
Moved from Argentina - in case anyone wants to use it -- (WT-en) Huttite 05:35, 19 Jan 2005 (EST)

Sushi in Buenos Aires

The intense growth of the city beside the River Plate in terms of culinary experiences has been outstanding. The late 2001 political and economical crisis has resulted in a positive way regarding the city's attractions, since the new exchange rate has made of Buenos Aires a very profitable and growing market for foreign investors. The former UCR government staff was christened by the local press as the Sushi group because of their chick way of living and expensive tastes. This characterization crashed with the one the press had made of the menemist government: pizza and champagne, a mix of sophistication and low-class origins. From the millenium to this part, Sushi places, bars, restaurants, pubs and all sort of culinary experiences linked to the Japanese culture have blossomed impressively. The alternatives for the delicate palates who enjoy this oriental feast to the senses broaden daily range from good to exquisite. Of the many different cuisine's that my wife and I have enjoyed, the delicious art form that is sushi is by far our favorite. And I would like to share our culinary experiences with all netsurfers that visit this weblog. That's why we will post up a review of each of the Sushi restaurants we eat at, talking about food quality, ambiance, service and of course all sort of additional tips that we find useful for the local and visitor who enjoys good quality, perfect service and extraordinary food!

Article status
I'm changing the status of this article back to outline because there are no complete listings on the Eat section. (WT-en) Rmx 14:09, 16 Jan 2006 (EST)

Article name
The city of Buenos Aires, at least outside of Argentina, is much much more famous than Buenos Aires (province). So I've moved the article from Buenos Aires (city) to Buenos Aires. --(WT-en) Evan 12:11, 6 Feb 2006 (EST)
 * Good move. I thought about this too when I created the article in pt: - it's a bit like the Paris vs. Paris (Texas) dilemma. (WT-en) Rmx 12:35, 6 Feb 2006 (EST)

 * Do these articles need moving too?
 * Buenos_Aires_(city)/San_Telmo -> Buenos_Aires/San_Telmo
 * Buenos_Aires_(city)/La_Boca -> Buenos_Aires/La_Boca
 * Buenos_Aires_(city)/Palermo -> Buenos_Aires/Palermo
 * Buenos_Aires_(city)/Recoleta -> Buenos_Aires/Recoleta
 * Buenos_Aires_(city)/Belgrano -> Buenos_Aires/Belgrano
 * Buenos_Aires_(city)/Boedo -> Buenos_Aires/Boedo
 * Buenos_Aires_(city)/Caballito -> Buenos_Aires/Caballito
 * Buenos_Aires_(city)/San_Cristobal -> Buenos_Aires/San_Cristobal

 * I did it. It fixed the breadcrumb navigation, so I guess that was the Right Thing To Do. Thanks for all your work, btw. -- (WT-en) Colin 18:03, 6 Feb 2006 (EST)

 * My pleasure, thanks for your help & patience.

Learn
I heard from a couple of friends that they are Spanish courses in Buenos Aires. I have seen the link from the uni BA. Is this the only one? (WT-en) Jan 05:23, 6 June 2006
 * Certainly not. I'm sure there are dozens of good courses available (see the Open Directory link on the left side navigation bar) but apparently only this one has been recommended by a Wikivoyager. --(WT-en) Ricardo (Rmx) 09:41, 6 June 2006 (EDT)
 * Thanks! I didn't know dmoz (WT-en) Jan 09:57, 6 June 2006

I'm writing a more complete overview on learning Spanish in Buenos Aires as the current one sentence is woefully lacking in utility. --(WT-en) Erik 18:58, 3 July 2009 (ART)

I would like to remove the Education Levels section. I don't see what point it serves to a traveler. Any objections? I'll give it a week. If I don't hear any objections I'm removing it.--(WT-en) Ekmsid 18:16, 7 July 2009 (EDT)

 * I certainly appreciate the consensus the consensus based approach, but I think this case is clear enough where you can just plunge forward and delete it! --(WT-en) Peter Talk 18:44, 7 July 2009 (EDT)

What exactly is 'latino spanish'? Argentina simply refers to Spanish as 'Castellano' due to history, not the fact that Argentina and Spain speak Castillian Spanish while the rest of Latin America speaks "Latino Spanish". In fact, due to heavy italian/lunfardo influences, Argentinian Spanish is one of the most removed varieties of Spanish from the original Castillian. Moreover, ALL of latin america speaks Castillian Spanish, Argentines (and Uruguayans) are the only one that refer to the language as such.

Minor changes
hola hice unos cambios pequeños puse a "clubbing" como un punto aparte separado de "drink", me parece que no quedaba bien ahi y ademas subi la parte que habla de buenos aires como destino turistico gay a "understand" porque en donde estaba quedaba totalmente fuera de contexto ... espero que esten de acuerdo.

Otra cosa, creo que habria que poner la direccion de los boliches, clubs, discos o como quieran llamarlo, la zona en la que se ubican cada uno y tambien mas o menos la musica que pasan. Gracias.........

(no soy de buenos aires asi que no puedo ayudar mucho jajaja)

 * Porque esto es el Wikivoyage inglés, preferimos que hables aquí en esa lengua si puedes. Ojalá conoces al Wikivoyage español, tambien? Tus cambios hacen sentido; gracias por la ayuda.  (Because this is the English Wikivoyage, we prefer that you talk here in that language. Hopefully you know about the Spanish Wikivoyage as well?  Your change makes sense; thanks for the help.) - (WT-en) Todd VerBeek 19:27, 26 July 2006 (EDT)

About Marini Buffet
I don't think that Marini should be recommended in such way. I've been there, it is good, but nothing AWESOME as the article suggest. Actually you can see some complaints about the place here: http://www.guiaoleo.com.ar/detail.php?ID=1026 So, i think that the recomendation is completely out of place.

 * Feel free to plunge forward and edit or remove the listing. (WT-en) Maj 02:01, 26 January 2007 (EST)

Congreso
Congreso is spelled with only one 's', you retards. 68.175.86.31 20:48, 21 January 2009 (EST)

I don't think "retards" belongs to the spirit of a wiki, but he's right, it's Congreso with only one S ( which means congress ). I don't change it because I see it links to a section, and I'm not sure how and if I can change that too. 201.212.109.232 22:59, 26 April 2009 (EDT)

Bloody Hell! All this griping about Congreso and nobody changed it!?! Very funny. It's fixed.(WT-en) Ekmsid 20:54, 4 July 2009 (EDT)

Racism in Buenos Aires
Is that section actually accurate, I have a feeling for it to be a bit of an exaggeration especially because at the end it states you should instead go to Brazil. Well, whoever lives there can be the judge of it, just wanted to point it out. —The preceding comment was added by (WT-en) 154.20.22.185 (talk • contribs)

 * It seemed pretty clearly over the top to me too (and the header was in all caps...). I don't like "racism in X" sections anyway—they are a little too subjective, and they invite controversy and other distractions. So I removed it altogether.  --(WT-en) Peter Talk 19:14, 3 March 2009 (EST)

Can we delete this section at this point? --(WT-en) Ekmsid 21:17, 4 July 2009 (EDT)

 * Do you mean this discussion? If so, no—we don't ever delete discussions. At most, we'd archive them, but we only do that if the talk page has grown very long. For the sake of transparency, we like discussions to stand, to keep a good record of how decisions were made. --(WT-en) Peter Talk 01:17, 5 July 2009 (EDT)

 * Thanks, good to know --(WT-en) Ekmsid 08:59, 23 July 2009 (EDT)

Crime
I took a big bite out of this section. Sorry for the allusion humor. I was shy about changing too much but there are a lot of inconsistent, vague and inaccurate statements. The section I didn't change is regarding Taxis. The same cautions are peppered throughout the whole article and they are out-dated. But first I had to talk with a few sources in BsAs to be sure of the accuracy of what I was going to say. This is coming soon. It is true that 4 years ago there continued to be crime issues with Taxis, but the government cracked down on illegal Taxis very successfully. Petty crime continues (like taking indirect routes or rarely changing money for counterfeits). Also the Ezeiza section goes on a bit and contradicts itself frequently. I took a small stab at that but, as taxi is a portion of it it needs more cleanup.

I welcome your opinions about what I'm planning to do. --(WT-en) Ekmsid 21:17, 4 July 2009 (EDT)

Districts talk (2017)
Now I am not an expert on Buenos Aires... In fact, I have never been there. But it does appear, that the current number of districts does not serve the voyager well as there are a lot of them with not all that much in them. Maybe some of them could be combined into bigger districts or alternatively the districts could be rebooted altogether? Just a thought... I will not be able to provide any further input on the issue... Hobbitschuster (talk) 21:55, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

 * Hobbitschuster, I am with you there! Even the Spanish article - the most comprehensive one for Buenos Aires on Wikivoyage, which has a similar district separation - has many stub articles. I have been to the city multiple times in 2004 and can confirm, that the main tourist attractions are pretty much centered in a relatively small space in and around the city center. That's why I would propose to merge everything into 3 district articles. Below is my recommendation. Maybe Ikan Kekek and other experienced contributors have time to express their opinion as well. In case you agree I can try my best to merge the current articles into 3 new ones.

Some topics, which might be worthwhile to discuss:
 * Add Barracas to South? The only attraction there seems to be this Pasaje Lanín.
 * Add a fourth article for all the remaining districts of Buenos Aires?

Thanks for you support! --Renek78 (talk) 13:43, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

 * Having used Wikivoyage to plan a recent trip to Buenos Aires, I can confirm that Renek78's proposed districts, together with a fourth district including the rest of the city, would have been more useful to me than the current ones. —Granger (talk · contribs) 15:57, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

 * Since I was pinged: I've never been to Argentina, so I'm happy to simply support the consensus here. Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:22, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

 * I've also never been, but I clicked on all the district articles and from a content perspective I support the consensus. I'd defer to anyone with actual knowledge of the city, however. --ButteBag (talk) 20:51, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

 * ButteBag, sounds good. How long shall we wait roughly?--Renek78 (talk) 22:41, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

 * Renek78, I would start putting the "Outskirts" article together now. Once you are tired of doing that it will probably have been long enough to start working on the other three! (I'm never sure about policies, but I think it's usually something in the range of 4 people saying "go for it" within a week or so? It's all a bit nebulous (intentionally).) Suerte! --ButteBag (talk) 14:16, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
 * It's been a few months now. I think if there are no objections, we can go ahead and reorganize the districts as Renek78 proposed. —Granger (talk · contribs) 02:02, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi Granger, thanks for starting the work! I'll help as soon as possible! --Renek78 (talk) 21:50, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I've merged the districts and added the new map to the article. All that's left to do now, I think, is to tidy up the new district articles and make sure that they're well organized and don't have duplicate listings (and that I didn't make any mistakes!). Thank you for coming up with this districtification—I think it serves the traveller much better than the previous one! —Granger (talk · contribs) 02:04, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Reciprocity Fee on U.S. Travelers Suspended
Stumbled on a memo from Argentina's Immigration "agency" stating that as of 26 March 2016, U.S. citizens will no longer be charged the $160 per person fee before or as they enter the country. Could someone with better sources than I confirm this and modify "Get in" for this article, and perhaps move the topic to the front of Get in? Have made similar request for Argentina. Regards, Hennejohn (talk)  17ː23, 19 April 2016  (UTC)

New banner?

I don't like the current banner of Buenos Aires very much. It is just a shot of some tall buildings. I'd like to propose replacing this with the musicians banner I had as an option for the country article. Any thoughts? --Andrewssi2 (talk) 04:10, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

 * These buildings aren't particularly interesting. I approve of substituting the new banner. Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:40, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

 * OK thanks. --Andrewssi2 (talk) 22:54, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Just added all of the district banners. Many of them will not be needed anymore, if we simplify the district set-up. --Renek78 (talk) 21:45, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Those street musicians could be anywhere in the world. Why not using Banner 3 or 9? At least those pictures are unmistakeable BA. --Renek78 (talk) 21:44, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I think banner 9 looks good. It's a nice picture, and I agree that it's recognizably Buenos Aires. —Granger (talk · contribs) 02:23, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

 * The musicians are a snapshot of Buenos Aires life. The vistas of buildings... well all are pretty soulless. Andrewssi2 (talk) 02:37, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

 * I guess. At least banner 9 looks like Buenos Aires. The musicians could just as easily be in New York or Santiago. —Granger (talk · contribs) 00:06, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

The districts of Buenos Aires
Simply put, those articles that exist are not in a good state overall, some districts simply redlink and the map has a lot of gray. I think a tabula rasa approach makes the most sense, but I fear there is nobody here with enough local knowledge to draw new districts from scratch... Does anybody have another idea? Maybe geotag the listings and go from there? Hobbitschuster (talk) 16:40, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

 * There are information on Wikipedia for each district, if we choose to wait with redistricting then I could take upon me to add basic information and geotagging to redlinked districts over the next week . --Jonte-- (talk) 09:14, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

 * There certainly is no rush and geotagging can do no harm. Remember that our districts have to cover everything and have no overlap. We are not bound by any administrative borders however, and may draw districts that make sense from a travel standpoint. Personally I know too little about Buenos Aires to draw districts myself, but I much appreciate you helping out with coordinates and the likes. Hobbitschuster (talk) 14:51, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

 * Good news! User:Renek78 has proposed new districts at Talk:Buenos Aires, which I think look like a significant improvement. —Granger (talk · contribs) 16:05, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

"Porteños" does not refer to immigration
The original name of the city is "Ciudad de la Santísima Trinidad y puerto de Santa María de los Buenos Aires". It was founded as a city with a port to fend off pirates and enemies in general. People from the port are "porteños". It has nothing to do with immigration.

Wikidata ID's for dynamic map
To the right is the map with all Wikidata ID's for the city. Just click on a district to get the corresponding Wikidata ID. This should simplify the work in case we want to change the district set-up in the future. The tool Wikidata Extractor has been used to create the mapshapes..--Renek78 (talk) 20:44, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Language of Porteños
The Talk section warns that the inhabitants speak an odd Spanish of their own. We are however referred to Argentinian dictionaries. So what is the relation between Spanish in Buenos Aires, that in the rest of Argentina and that of most Latin America? I think this article should only briefly mention that there are differences between Argentine and Latin American Spanish and that in Spain, and concentrate on differences between that of Porteňos and the rest of Argentina. –LPfi (talk) 13:43, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Suspect typo
from Correct typos in one click subte->subtle? (omit) context: combining two or more bus and/or subte subte lines

title: Talk:Buenos Aires


text:
Talk:Buenos Aires (disambiguation)

I want to point out, that there is already a page about the city of Buenos Aires, in Buenos_Aires_(city)

title: Talk:Buenos Aires (disambiguation)


text:
Talk:Buenos Aires/Belgrano

Translation please
Belgrano es uno de los barrios porteños que más ha crecido en los últimos 30 años. Se ubica al norte de Palermo y allí se afincan familias de clase media y media alta. La avenida Cabildo lo atraviesa de Norte a Sur. En su intersección con la avenida Juramento, dispone de un gran centro comercial, con restaurantes, bares, etc., que vale la pena visitar. Cerca de allí, se encuentran las Barrancas de Belgrano, un parque con lomas que los vecinos aprovechan en el verano para ir a tomar sol. Desde el centro de la ciudad, se llega a Belgrano en la línea D de subte (metro); bajarse en la estación Juramento. También puede llegarse en tren desde la estación Retiro. Detrás de las vías de la estación Belgrano, se encuentra el Barrio Chino, con sus restaurantes y comercios típicos. Consejo al turista dado por una porteña (habitante de Buenos Aires): no conozca sólo el circuito turístico de Buenos Aires (La Boca, San Telmo, Puerto Madero); conozca el Buenos Aires real, el que viven sus habitantes. Éste incluye muchos otros barrios interesantes: Palermo, Belgrano, Villa Urquiza, Boedo, etc.

title: Talk:Buenos Aires/Belgrano


text:
Talk:Buenos Aires/La Boca

As a district of Buenos Aires, this should either be part of that article or moved to a subarticle Buenos Aires/La Boca. Can someone confirm this is a district and not a suburb? Thanks (WT-en) Majnoona 14:32, 10 Apr 2005 (EDT)

It's a district. I'll move it. (WT-en) DanielC 21:06, 10 Apr 2005 (BST)

Replace banner
Any objections to replace the fuzzy existing banner with my proposal? --Andrewssi2 (talk) 05:38, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

 * Obvious improvement. Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:49, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

 * Thanks! --Andrewssi2 (talk) 07:36, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

 * No, thank you for the new banner! Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:40, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:Buenos Aires/La Boca


text:
Talk:Buenos Aires/Recoleta

As a district of Buenos Aires (city), this should either be part of that article or moved to a subarticle Buenos Aires (city)/La Recoleta. Can someone confirm this is a district and not a suburb? Thanks (WT-en) Majnoona 14:31, 10 Apr 2005 (EDT)

It's a district. I'll move it. (WT-en) DanielC 21:06, 10 Apr 2005 (BST)

How do you get here once in buenos aires?

title: Talk:Buenos Aires/Recoleta


text:
Talk:Buenos Aires wine tourism

Itinerary, merge or delete?
This is obviously spam in its current form, but is there an itinerary/travel topic struggling to get out, or should it be merged into Buenos Aires (province)? (WT-en) Jpatokal 00:49, 23 January 2009 (EST)
 * Nearly all of Wikivoyage's wine regions are underdeveloped. Maybe gut all the touts, rename and move to Argentina's Wine Regions, and label it a travel topic. If you cross link it at wine tourism, maybe someone will save it and give this topic the attention it deserves. (WT-en) WineCountryInn 20:34, 23 January 2009 (EST)
 * I think it could be merged into Buenos Aires (province) and its cities. The topic of wine tourism should be discussed in regions and destinations, if the information is undeveloped. Once there is enough in Argentina and its regions to make a separate article, only then should a country specific wine tourism article be considered. What's the point having all the good information about a destination buried in specialist articles? - (WT-en) Huttite 03:02, 26 January 2009 (EST)

title: Talk:Buenos Aires wine tourism