text:
Talk:Congress (Ohio)

vfd?
I put this page together and I'm not sure why it should be deleted. Congress doesn't have the things to do like eat, drink, and play golf, but it is a nice relaxing place to hang out to get away from things. My main purpose was to get locals to put together more. Do what you must, but don't expect me to contribute anything in the future, if this is what you're going to do to my contributions.

 * This is a travel guide, so you're going to have to come up with some reason for a traveller to go there -- if they can't eat, drink, sleep or see anything, then why bother? But please chip in at Project:Votes for deletion, there's still two weeks to go until the article's fate is decided. (WT-en) Jpatokal 08:02, 15 October 2006 (EDT)

 * Please add to the discussion on Project:Votes_for_deletion. I am in agreement with you, but we have a policy that says; "A common test to determine whether a subject gets its own article is the "can you sleep there?" test" in Project:What_is_an_article%3F. It is my belief that every small place could and should have an article. People do travel to cities, towns and villages that have no hotels or motels. I did add a sleep place nearby for Congress and it is my hope the article is not deleted. I am biased about the policy so I don't normally vote to keep these places, but I do add information so they are kept. I do hope you will stick around and help with content on Wikivoyage and please don't take the request for deletion as personal. Add your reasons for keeping in Project:Votes_for_deletion and I think you may be successful. Thanks. -- (WT-en) Tom Holland (xltel) 08:05, 15 October 2006 (EDT)

 * I'm sorry Tom and anonymous, but I really don't think we're going to be able to save this page even if our lives depended on it. As Wikipedia notes "the village has a total area of 0.4 km² (0.2 mi²)."  It's kind of hard to make a travel guide out of any place that small.  I'll be glad to retract  any of my objections if we can make an actual guide out of this place, but even the sole accommodation listing in Congress isn't even located in the proper guide.  -- (WT-en) Sapphire 08:56, 15 October 2006 (EDT)

If you want to delete the article, I understand. I know there's nothing of substance there. I've been there a number of times. It is a nice place to visit and park and relax because there is nothing there. I guess there are many places in Ohio and the World like that, so sticking to the tourists traps with the glitter and glame may be better. I have an issue with articles like Mansfield, OH, that is just an outline and nothing more. Lets start working on articles like that because Mansfield does have alot to offer travelers.

vfd discussion
Archived from the Project:Votes for deletion page:

 * Apparently fails the can you sleep there test . Also, the Wayne County CVB lists no attractions in Congress.  I suggest deleting this page and then include any sights or activities within the Wayne County regional page.  -- (WT-en) Sapphire 20:16, 14 October 2006 (EDT)
 * Keep. The can-you-sleep-there test is as much about being the kind of place where one can sleep -- villages yes, malls no -- as whether there is an actual hotel.  See North Dakota for all sorts of precedents for keeping places like this one. -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 21:34, 14 October 2006 (EDT)
 * There's one huge difference between North Dakota and Ohio. North Dakota is the 4th least populated state so smaller villages like Congress may actually be a destination in North Dakota, but villages of this size in Ohio are far less likely to be a destination.  After searching multiple resources I cannot believe this village would be anything more than part of the landscape during a Sunday drive.
 * Todd Ver Beek apparently has similar opinions since I quote him: "A small town or "census designated region" without lodging, restaurants, and/or identifiable attractions. (Info about these is usually best incorporated into an article covering a larger region.)" See more of his thoughts here - Wikivoyage_talk:What_is_an_article%3F. -- (WT-en) Sapphire 00:03, 15 October 2006 (EDT)
 * I am not sure why that small places in North Dakota would be more likely visited then small places anywhere else in the world. The most common reason small places are visited are because you have relative or friend there. I also believe we have room on Wikivoyage for small places, for sure if we have someone excited about creating information on the place. Ask your self this before voting to delete; If you had a friend or relative in in Congress and were going there to visit, wouldn't it be a travel destination for you? How small it too small? If I visit a relative there and sleep in their house, is that a place to sleep? Just the ramblings of someone who was born in a small town and loves to visit them. -- (WT-en) Tom Holland (xltel) 09:22, 15 October 2006 (EDT)
 * I do have relatives that I visit quite often in a very small town called Owensville, Clermont County, Ohio, but I would never create an article for Owensville because though it has 700 more residents than Congress does and is twice the size (0.4 square miles) of Congress it doesn't need an article.  The eat/drink sections would be populated with the three gas stations in the town, and "see" would list "cows and corn".  I could imagine cow tipping might fit under "do", but let's get real if there is nothing to do or see in the town there's no reason for the place to have an article on Wikivoyage.  I have to argue if you have a relative's house to stay at the best option for you is to ask them what to do in the town and I'll bet if you have a relative in Congress they're going to say "Umm, cow tipping?"  Owensville and Congress both belong in the respective parental regional guides.  Seriously though, the anonymous user that created the page summed Congress up as "Congress doesn't have the things to do like eat, drink, and play golf, but it is a nice relaxing place to hang out to get away from things" can we not place Congress in the Wayne County guide and use his discription?  If this was Wikiatlas I'd be all for Congress, but it's not Wikiatlas and we don't make a guide for every place that exists for the sole purpose census calculations. -- (WT-en) Sapphire 09:49, 15 October 2006 (EDT)
 * Possibly a good rule of thumb for places like this is "would you ever want to go there if you didn't know someone who lived there (who could presumably offer better information than any guidebook)". If the answer's no, it seems hard to see what purpose an article could possibly serve. --(WT-en) Paul. 13:25, 15 October 2006 (EDT)
 * Whether or not it's a "good" rule of thumb, it isn't a current criterion, and I would not presume to judge whether readers "want to go there." Either it's a destination or it's not, and by the criteria that we do use, it is.  I repeat: Keep. -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 19:54, 15 October 2006 (EDT)
 * After reading over the policy there is nothing to indicate that current policy indicates this is a destination nor is there anything that say's it's not a destination. I'd like to clear that up immediately and discuss that here. -- (WT-en) Sapphire 20:44, 15 October 2006 (EDT)

 * Merge and delete to Wayne County. --(WT-en) Terence Ong 02:54, 15 October 2006 (EDT)
 * Keep. I think a discussion should be raised in general about wtf are we going to do with every little crossroads and where to split the gray areas.  In the meantime it looks like a place for now, though the article should be mostly empty.  Content for Sleep, for example, should just point to nearest town with a motel. -- (WT-en) Colin 04:05, 16 October 2006 (EDT)
 * Keep. My, you guys have been having a good old time on this! I love you all, even those who are wrong(tm). (WT-en) OldPine 19:43, 17 October 2006 (EDT)
 * The problem I have is that there isn't even a vague defination of destination and my big concern is that people are miscontsruing "place" to mean "destination". There are very big differences between a place and a destination.  Please help me define what the definition of "destination".  I truly believe Congress is not a destination because 1. There are no accommodations in Congress, there are no eateries, there are no bars, there are no sights in Congress.  2.  The village is does not have a website.  3.  The village is not covered in Wayne County's  CVB website.  3.  There are no hits on Google that suggest Congress is a destination.  We really need to define what a destination is, because I don't believe that because a place has a semi-important thoroughfare makes that place a destination.  Tom, Bill, Colin, Terrence, David, Paul will you guys please help me define what a destination is.  I've started a discussion here. -- (WT-en) Sapphire 20:13, 17 October 2006 (EDT)
 * Keep It's a bit of a close call, what with the campground, but I think it stays. Travel != Tourism and we should avoid any prescriptive destination selection on the basis of would visit or should visit. (WT-en) Maj 10:11, 18 October 2006 (EDT)
 * The campground actually belongs in West Salem or West Salem (Ohio), which seems to actually be a destination. I'd be more than happy to create that guide once the Wayne County CVB's website is back online. -- (WT-en) Sapphire 10:54, 18 October 2006 (EDT)

 * I have no idea why I feel so passionately against Congress so don't ask me why I hate this place so very much. Anyhow, I've called the Wayne County CVB and I asked the woman who answered the phone if they could send me information about Congress.  She laughed when I asked that and then stated "Congress is nothing."  I asked her to elaborate and she couldn't she just said there was nothing there.  Even the bureau in charge of promoting this region is of the same opinion that I am.  CVB's phone number: 330-264-1800. -- (WT-en) Sapphire 11:39, 18 October 2006 (EDT)

 * I thought we were talking about Congress in Ohio. If you mean the one in Washington, DC, I'm with you. (WT-en) OldPine 16:39, 18 October 2006 (EDT)

 * Keep is my vote, separate article, not merged. Sounds like Wikivoyage "will" be the most complete travel guide with coverage of places like Congress. I have got to say, may not be much of a place, but if I ever get close, I will visit. As time goes on we will see more people who are from small places, towns and villages finding the "wiki way" and making sure that their spot DOES have coverage. In my mind, the lack of coverage from anybody else, including some lady sitting in a town of 24,000 that thinks a place with a population of 197 "is nothing", is all the more reason for us to set aside a few bytes to coverage of Congress. I am not saying we need to cover a junction with or without a gas station, but if you go to Google, there are streets, people, post office and believe it or not.... It is a destination for at lease one Wikivoyageer that created the article. If this one is deleted, then we need to come up with a policy of places we delete that are larger then just a crossroad and start doing a clean up, we have a lot of places that are small but bigger then a crossroad. Now, if we start including crossroads... then I know a few of those also. ha! -- (WT-en) Tom Holland (xltel) 06:26, 19 October 2006 (EDT)

 * I'm working developing a prototype of what a regional page may look like if we merge small places.   I will probably always maintain that this is not a destination and I think we need to work out what exactly to do with these places.  Congress has 1,346 bytes why not merge those 1,346 bytes and make  Wayne County a much more useful guide?  If you would please add your thoughts to the discussion about what to do about "every dot on a map".  If you search for that phrase it should pop up.  Anyhow, I'm working on this prototype I think it will make our regional guides much more useful and prevent fairly pointless guides from being created.  Hopefully, I'll be able to 'unveil' it soon. -- (WT-en) Sapphire 06:52, 19 October 2006 (EDT)

 * I can see a consensus here and just to make this easier for whoever is on clerical duty for the day after tomorrow (October 29th) I vote keep and void my previous delete vote. -- (WT-en) Andrew H. (Sapphire) 20:44, 27 October 2006 (EDT)

title: Talk:Congress (Ohio)


text:
Talk:Connecticut

All this stuff needs to go into the right city/region pages (WT-en) Majnoona 11:55, 19 April 2006 (EDT)

Other sites

 * Club Getaway: an all inclusive, camp-like resort in the Berkshires. Located in Kent, approximately 90 minutes north of NYC. http://www.clubgetaway.com
 * Limerock Park: A scenic racetrack located in the Berkshires of Northwestern CT. Holds many events each year, including a 4th of July American LeMans Series event.
 * Lake Compounce Amusement Park: Holding the title of America's Oldest Continually Operating Amusement Park, Lake Compounce has many thrills for kids or teens.
 * Dinosaur State Park: Dinosaur tracks from 200 million years ago were found in the CT River Valley. Come and make a plaster cast of a footprint, explore the exhibits, or take a stroll on the 2 miles of nature trails.
 * Harriet Beecher Stowe House: Visit the Hartford Home of the woman known to single handedly start the Civil War.
 * Noah Webster House : Home to the author of the first American Dictionary.
 * Mark Twain's House: Check in on the home of the most famous author known for his works "Huck Finn" and "Tom Sawyer"
 * Elizabeth Park Rose Garden: For those who love old time beauty, visit the nations first municipal rose garden, truly gorgeous.
 * *Nathan Hale Homestead: Visit the home of CT's State Hero, Nathan Hale. No American can forget his final quote of, "I only regret that I have but one life to lose for my country." *
 * Sleeping Giant State Park in Hamden CT: A great place to hike, take a walk, plan a picnic. The mountain is actually in the shape of a sleeping gaint. There is also an authentic stone castle at the top of the mountain, kids love it too! http://www.friendsctstateparks.org/parks/sleeping_giant.htm http://www.sgpa.org/hikes/hikes.html
 * Struck items were moved. (WT-en) OldPine 09:11, 22 July 2006 (EDT)

Regions
So according to the state tourism authority, there are 5 regions in Conneticut. I think it's small enough that we don't need to break them up into North, South, East, West, or Southeastern, etc as there would only be one sub-region in each. Is there anyone local who can speak as to the usual way of breaking up the state? Do you say "Southeastern" or Fairfield? Thanks(WT-en) Majnoona 12:00, 19 April 2006 (EDT)

 * Not really an expert, but I think the five regions above delineated by counties that they encompass would work. Would like to get this structured before it gets more unwieldy.(WT-en) OldPine 12:15, 12 July 2006 (EDT)

 * I installed the regions per the per the tourism site and included towns. Lets see if there is further discussion before I proceed further. (WT-en) OldPine 14:28, 13 July 2006 (EDT)

Fairfield County

Fairfield county is lcoated in the southwest portion of the state bordered by Long Island Sound on the south, New York State on west, and the Housatonic river on the east. Its major cities include Greenwich, Stamford, and Bridgeport. It is a very wealthy area with a short commute to New York City by train or a slow crawl along interstate 95 or the Merritt Parkway. Residents of the southern portion of Fairfield county often refer to this area as the "Gold Coast".

South Central Connecticut

The South Central region is immediately east of Fairfield county and is centered around the city of New Haven. The city of New Haven major attractions are centered around Yale University's campus.

The Connecticut Shoreline

The Shoreline area consists of the shoreline towns (or those close to the shoreline) to the east of South Central region (beginning in Guilford and moving along the shore to Old Saybrook.

The Mystic area The town of Mystic has a popular aquarium and seaport as well as a quaint village. The state's two casinos are also in this vicinity.

Litchfield county Litchfield is in the northwest portion of the state. It is bordered by Massachusetts to the north and New York State to the west. Litchfield has the state's largest lake, Lake Candlewood, and is often visted in the Autumn for its foliage.

The Hartford area The state's capital region. —The preceding comment was added by (WT-en) 71.235.0.60 (talk • contribs) 21 July 2006 (EDT)

 * OK, that's pretty much as I thought. As per above, the towns have been divided up into regions based on: http://www.tourism.state.ct.us/tourism_regions/ (WT-en) OldPine 19:57, 21 July 2006 (EDT)

 * I do not think the regions setup for Mystic-Eastern is particularly accurate, considering the "Quiet Corner" definitely does not see itself as having much in common with the Mystic Shoreline area. I would personally suggest having a "Quiet Corner" or Northeastern region, which encompasses all of Windham County, with potentially some spillover into places like Willington, Storrs, Mansfield, etc. which, while not part of Windham County proper, have much in common with the region. I'm particularly referencing (as a resident of the region) the quiet, rural, historical communities, wide-ranging woodlands and parks, and closer ties with Mass and Rhode Island (or perhaps a certain viewpoint of "we're different than the rest of the state") which you do not see much outside of this area. Willimantic and Putnam (and potentially Killingly/Danielson/Dayville) should be the regional hubs of activity for this region. --Ambarenya13 (talk) 13:42, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

 * How many cities with articles would be in each of those regions? Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:53, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

 * At the very least, Willimantic and Putnam should have their own articles for the region (until the mid-1980s, they were city status in CT, and still act as important centers for the area). Norwich potentially as well, but it has more ties with Mystic and New London than the "Quiet Corner".

 * 3 articles is very few. I would hope for 5-9 per region. Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:32, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

 * That's just for cities, though. Potentially every historical town in the area (Pomfret, Thompson, Woodstock, etc), in addition to attractions such as parks and shopping centers, could have a page. I don't think it's logical that, a region whose primary draw is small towns and scenery, is to be defined solely by number of city articles. The region has essentially nothing to do with what's down south. It's like saying New York is the same as Boston because it's in the Northeast. --Ambarenya13 (talk) 13:48, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

 * You understandably misunderstood my question. On Wikivoyage, "cities" is a generic term that also covers towns and villages. So what I really mean to ask you is how many populated places would there be that merit a Wikivoyage article and would be listed in the "Cities" section of the two region articles you propose to create out of the one existing one? If you have a sense of it, too, how many non-populated "Other destinations" (e.g. articles for islands and perhaps some parks that would overwhelm city articles if treated just as "See" listings within them) would each region be likely to have? Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:51, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Colleges in Connecticut
Please add the following to the list of Connecticut colleges:

Fairfield University, Fairfield CT Sacred Heart University, Fairfield, CT Quinnipiac University, Hamden, CT University of New Haven, West Haven, CT Wesleyan College, Middletown, CT Trinity College, Hartford, CT University of Hartford, Hartford, CT

There are also several branches of Connecticut State University that are separate from UConn: Southern Connecticut State, New Haven, CT WEstern Connecticut State, Danbury, CT Central Connecticut State, New Britain, CT

Community Colleges: Norwalk Community College, Norwalk,CT Housatonic Community College, Bridgeport, CT Gateway Community College, New Haven, CT North Western Connecticut Community College, Winsted, CT

—The preceding comment was added by (WT-en) FlossyCT (talk • contribs)

 * This article need not contain a comprehensive directory of Connecticut's institutes of higher learning. We list only a few campuses that could be considered attractions in their own rights.  (WT-en) LtPowers 09:37, 13 July 2010 (EDT)

Images
I just looked at the Featured, Quality and Valued image results on Commons Category:Connecticut, and most are irrelevant. The only interesting relevant one I saw was a Valued photo of the Norwich City Hall. That said, let's strategize what should be depicted. Here are some ideas:

(1) A photo of some iconic Yale University buildings or a view including them is obligatory. (2) A panorama of Long Island Sound, with or without an estuary and bridge (3) A photo of some natural beauty in the Litchfield Hills and/or Eastern Connecticut would be good. When I think of of the Litchfield Hills, I think of forested mountains, lakes, the Housatonic River and pretty small towns. Kent is a nice one. (4) A photo of pretty houses in Greenwich or another wealthy suburb. (5) A photo of Mystic Seaport (6) A photo of some of the pretty buildings in Hartford

I think these photos are either going to have to be looked for under other Commons Categories than "Connecticut", and/or many of them may not have a special classification (Featured, Quality or Valued). Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:12, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Stamford
Should Stamford be in the list of 9 cities? Greenwich seems like the one that doesn't belong. Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:52, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

 * Nobody seems interested, so I'll act unilaterally. Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:44, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Dayton Kingery - Connecticut Editor
Thought I'd introduce myself as I'm from Connecticut and interested in editing all pages related to the state. If there's anyone else here from CT, please say hi :) Dayton Kingery (talk) 16:53, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Talk:Connecticut


text:
Talk:Connecticut River Valley

Name
Do people refer to this as the "See Tee River Valley"? If not, I'd rather move this to Connecticut River Valley instead of using an abbreviation. - (WT-en) Todd VerBeek 12:46, 22 July 2006 (EDT)
 * No, if they refer to it at all they call it the "Connecticut River Valley". (WT-en) OldPine 14:54, 22 July 2006 (EDT)

Extra-region?
This shouldn't be breadcrumbed to Connecticut. This river valley is in 4 states. Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:45, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

 * A year later, can we please resolve this problem? I would suggest creating a new article called Central Connecticut and changing this one to an extraregion article that more clearly encompasses the four-state valley it purports to represent. Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:17, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

 * An additional issue is that the "Regions" section doesn't cover Vermont or New Hampshire at all. Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:19, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

title: Talk:Connecticut River Valley


text:
Talk:Connemara

I've decided to change the cities section to 'Towns & Villages' as Connemara doesn't have any built up areas that resemble cities. --(WT-en) Disonyxiated 18:48, 10 June 2007 (EDT)
 * Thanks for the edits, but we try and standardize our first and second level headers. Rather than have 50 different headers ("Unincorporated Villages" "Townships" "Hamlets"), we just call all populated places "Cities". If a destination really isn't a city/town/village (ie a national park, etc) then it can go under "Other Destinations". HTH (WT-en) Maj 08:39, 11 June 2007 (EDT)

title: Talk:Connemara


text:
Talk:Constanța

Personal comment
''Break! One year ago i was in Constanta and accidentally tripped on my own backpack, only to fall down and found 100 Romanian Lei! If that doesn't screech of the mystical profundity of the black sea region, i don't know WHAT does.''

First person observation such as this does not belong in article. (Unless the streets are paved with gold, etc.) -- (WT-en) Huttite 00:53, 12 Feb 2005 (EST)

Historical story
''Constanta was founded by the Romans as a port on the sea for trading with inland people, sailing along the Don river into what is today Russia, or Kazahkstan. Throughout the years it was used as a coastal resort for retiring Kings and Emperors, until one day so many emperors showed up at once that a great battle was fought. The site of this battle is marked by 36 massive pillars extending horizontally from the castle gates to the shores of the black sea. Years have passed since their erection, and they remain as robust and beautiful as ever. In 1910, the governor of Constanta, Dominco Domiscu, called a meeting of the house of the people and a law was enacted to remove all but 32 of the pillars. To this day, only 31 pillars lay across dominating the skyscape of Constanta.''

''Why not 32, you ask? Well, it's a little known fact that one of the pillars was supporting another, so when it was taken down, the one it was supporting fell. Upon falling it smashed upon the house of the people, killing Domiscu and his family. The irony was so potent that the city erected 27 huge pillars running from the house of the people all the way to the shore of the black sea, and to this day there are 58 massive and huge pillars which cast their imposing shadow across the mysitcal skies of this ancient, magical romanian town.''

How accurate is this story? I have shortened it considerably. It is also confusing. I cannot work out if there are 36, 32, 31, 27 or 58 pillars as the story is internally inconsistant, so I have used the word many. Perhaps someone can give an authorative answer? -- (WT-en) Huttite 00:53, 12 Feb 2005 (EST)

Not accurate at all. Constanta was founded in the 7th century BC by Greek colonists and it was initially called Tomis. There's no pillars either and the story of the Romans settling on the west shore of the Black Sea to explore the Don river is nonsense. I've already edited out once the page while unregistered but it appears that a higher being fell for this story and reverted my edits. Here's some info from the official city hall site: http://www.primaria-constanta.ro/PrimariaConstanta/English/Machete/MachetaEngSimpla.aspx?paginaID=91&detaliuID=140 -- (WT-en) Davidb 08:59, 11 March 2005 (EET)

I've deleted that made up history of the town. Check the Constanţa article on Wikipedia for more information on that subject. (WT-en) Mentatus 05:06, 18 April 2006 (EDT)

title: Talk:Constanța


text:
Talk:Continental Greece in ten days

This is a great itinerary! Great job. --(WT-en) Evan 20:28, 27 Jul 2004 (EDT)

title: Talk:Continental Greece in ten days


text:
Talk:Cook County

Does this article need moving to Cook County (Illinois) ?
 * I think Cook County is so sufficiently well known that most Americans (Maybe Canadians?) will know Cook County refers to the county Chicago is in. Using a should suffice if a disambiguation page is needed. -- (WT-en) Andrew Haggard (Sapphire) 22:31, 16 July 2006 (EDT)
 * Cook County is one of a small number of counties in the US that are well-known by name outside of their area. I live about 4 hours' drive from there, in another state, and if someone said "Cook County", I would not only recognize the name, but I would assume they were talking about the Chicago area.  I can't say for sure how "much more famous" than other Cook Counties it is outside of the Midwest (where I live), but if you ask me, I'd say leave it.
 * I also just noticed that there isn't currently any other article for a "Cook County", and all the links to this article are referring to the one in Illinois. Being pro-active is nice, but I'd really rather wait until there is a conflict between two counties with the same name, rather than trying to anticipate them and creating unnecessary disambiguations.  (Even if there is another Cook County somewhere, that doesn't mean we'll actually create an article for it.  Counties are often the logical unit to divide a state region into, but not always.  So let's cross that disambiguation bridge when/if we come to it.)  Disambiguation is a last resort, to be used only when needed.  So that's a definte "no". - (WT-en) Todd VerBeek 22:38, 16 July 2006 (EDT)

Cook County
It's time to seriously reorganise Chicagoland. It seems to me that these county articles might make sense in a guide for locals who know all about the county boundries, etc. however they are not terribly useful for the traveller. If the counties are mentioned at all it should be in a geographical exposition in Chicagoland.

 * I'm definitely supportive of not using counties as regions, but given the famousness of this one it might be worth keeping as a redirect. - (WT-en) Todd VerBeek 11:18, 25 May 2007 (EDT)
 * Famous or not the page has sat empty for several years, and I think it's a good part of why Chicagoland has been stagnant, since nobody has wanted to undertake a county-by-county exposition of the suburbs. -- (WT-en) Mark 05:57, 27 May 2007 (EDT)

 * Redirect. I'm from that continent but not that region. I've never been closer to Chicago than its airport. I recognise "Cook county" but had never heard of Chicagoland until I saw the page here. I think that means some people might search for Cook county, so there should be a redirect. (WT-en) Pashley 06:25, 27 May 2007 (EDT)

 * Good point. I've done it. -- (WT-en) Mark 15:30, 27 May 2007 (EDT)

 * Redirect (WT-en) WindHorse 21:48, 3 June 2007 (EDT)

title: Talk:Cook County


text:
Talk:Cookeville

I removed this link: CookevilleThrive - Your Guide to the Community of Cookeville Tennessee. (Actually, this is my guide to the community of Cookeville, Tennessee, but I think the link-adder thought differently.) --(WT-en) Evan 09:01, 14 December 2006 (EST)

title: Talk:Cookeville


text:
Talk:Cook Islands

For future reference the Project:CIA World Factbook 2002 import can be found at Talk:Cook Islands/CIA World Factbook 2002 import - (WT-en) Huttite 02:30, 1 Jan 2006 (EST)

12 or 24 hour clock in the Cook Islands
Generally we use 12 hour clock for NZ articles, but I'm seeing the 24 hour clock being used in most of our Cook Islands articles. Never been to the Cook Islands so don't know. Add to the exception list? ? SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 13:57, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I checked out some of the links on the Rarotonga page. If they have times, they are 12-hour clock. The government's bus timetable is, too. This is not an authoritative search, but in the absence of better information, I'd go with that. Ground Zero (talk) 20:35, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Sure, I'll switch all of the pages that use 24. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 23:00, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Also, how do we format currency? As $100, or NZ$100. I'm not sure whether $100 might be confused with CI$100. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 23:08, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Doesn't CI$1.00 = NZ$1.00? If so, there is no problem with confusion. Ground Zero (talk) 23:17, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Okay, so similar situation as the FKP. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 23:19, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:Cook Islands


text:
Talk:Cooktown

The original text was apparently copied from []. -- (WT-en) Huttite 23:10, 25 Dec 2005 (EST)

title: Talk:Cooktown


text:
Talk:Cooper (Maine)

There's a Cooper City, but I can't find anything about "Cooper" -- anyone know where this is? (WT-en) Maj 12:37, 20 December 2006 (EST)

http://www.maine.gov/local/washington/cooper/ it might exist?

title: Talk:Cooper (Maine)


text:
Talk:Cooperstown (disambiguation)

Disambiguation?
Does Cooperstown (New York) meet our "much more famous" guideline for getting the un-disambiguated title? Cooperstown, New York, is a baseball mecca and named after legendary author James Fenimore Cooper; the one in North Dakota is a fairly average small town. (WT-en) LtPowers 11:14, 6 October 2011 (EDT)

 * Neither is very famous, but... I'm all for removing disambiguators when we can, and the ND Cooperstown, although we have a decent enough guide to it, is nowheresville. --Peter Talk 21:01, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

 * Cooperstown, New York, is famous among baseball fans. I've never heard of Cooperstown, North Dakota. I think the town in New York passes the test. Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:32, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

 * I have never heard of either, and would not consider myself geographically challenged. I would guess that most people outside of the US would not know either. • • • Peter (Southwood) (talk): 05:59, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

 * It may not be famous outside of the US, but inside of the US Cooperstown is synonymous with baseball. Also, for what it's worth w:Cooperstown redirects to the town in New York. -- Ryan • (talk) • 06:05, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

 * With only two to choose from, we're not adding any additional clicks to get to the lesser known version. --Inas (talk) 01:02, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

 * We usually link to the dab page even when there's only one other choice, don't we? So it would actually increase the number of clicks.  LtPowers (talk) 12:14, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

 * Tally up one more pro-"much more famous" vote from me. -- AndreCarrotflower (talk) 06:31, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:Cooperstown (disambiguation)


text:
Talk:Coorg

The original content of this page appears to have been copied from http://www.karnataka.com/tourism/coorg/ - If you want to rewrite the information that is there into Wikivoyage articles then that is OK. Copying the informationis not as it doesn't fit our style or is legal. -- (WT-en) Huttite 20:29, 6 Jan 2006 (EST)

title: Talk:Coorg


text:
Talk:Coorg-Bylanakuppe

VFD Discussion

 * Merge/Delete. Seems to be started in good faith by a new poster, but it's simply about a monastery. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the normal procedure would be to merge any information about the monastery into an article about the nearest village or town and delete this new article. (WT-en) Ikan Kekek 03:18, 27 March 2012 (EDT)
 * Merge/Delete Full agreement to your proposal. (WT-en) Jc8136 07:52, 28 March 2012 (EDT)
 * Merge and redirect per policy. The monastery name is a plausible search term. (WT-en) Pashley 23:23, 11 April 2012 (EDT)
 * Merge and redirect looks like an auspicious move. (WT-en) Travelpleb 23:21, 18 April 2012 (EDT)

Result: Redirected to Kodagu. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 13:09, 22 April 2012 (EDT)

title: Talk:Coorg-Bylanakuppe


text:
Talk:Copacabana

When I was in Copacabana two years ago, we arrived on a Saturday night, and to our chagrin, all hotels were booked. We were getting ready to camp on the hillside and take turns on the watch, but a hotel keeper let us sleep in their rec room. Has anyone else had similar experiences? No books that I've read on Copa insisted on arriving with hotel reservations. --(WT-en) Bletch 22:37, 16 Feb 2005 (EST)
 * Nope. I arrived 3 days ago and there is no problem finding a room. But then again it's low-season right now. (WT-en) Ronald 20:11, 9 Feb 2006 (EST)

La Leyenda
Two different opinions were posted on La Leyenda. Since we don't do reviews, I've written up a description that's less opininated. The original comments are below. - (WT-en) Shaund 23:00, 25 March 2010 (EDT)

First Opinion: The hotel´s owner has a real suave and passionate manner about him, which is a treat. Although the breakfast is the same continental style of most other hostels, they put a little bit of extra love into it. Try to get a room on the second or third floors, as the views (especially sunsets) are great. Bs. 100 for a very large room with double bed and private (excellent) bathroom. Highly recommended - support the little guy!

Second Opinion: We stayed here in March 2010, and did not find the above to be true. The staff weren't particularly friendly, the breakfast was plain and simple, and the rooms, although charming in a rustic sort of way, could use some serious renovation. Our bed sagged so badly that it was U-shaped in the middle and we woke up with aching backs. The hotel would be fine if it weren't wildly overpriced for the market - for half the price (50 Bs.) you can get a cleaner, much more modern room with cable TV across the street at Hotel Mirador, up the street at Hotel Los Andes, or around the corner at Hotel Wendy Mar.

title: Talk:Copacabana


text:
Talk:Copán Ruinas

Is this the tourist town of "Copan Ruinas," or is it the nearby Archeological site?

title: Talk:Copán Ruinas


text:
Talk:Copenhagen

Hi. I don't know if this is a problem with the article, or with the new thumb markup, or with my browser (I'm running MSIE 6.0), but this article looks wrong around the 'See' and 'Do' sections, with text and pictures piling up in an apparantly random collision. -- (WT-en) Chris j wood 09:12, 11 Aug 2004 (EDT)

I know. I tried playing with the tags, but it did not help. But i hope it will look when there is more text. User:(WT-en) Elgaard

Tivoli
I think Tivoli should get its own article. (WT-en) elgaard 12:54, 30 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Nah, it's not nearly big enough for that (WT-en) Sertmann 05:58, 13 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Check the new Indre By article, I covered Tivoli in a infobox, to separate the content. I'm not quite sure if we should cover the restaurants there - as i think adding restaurants to the infobox would break the lay out (WT-en) Sertmann 18:08, 18 October 2008 (EDT)

Kastellet
I think Kastellet should be merged with Østerbro (WT-en) Sertmann 14 September 2008 (EDT)
 * i merged Kastellet with Østerbro :-), i also merged Christianshavn and Holmen, you can't sleep there, and it's much easier to build on the article this way - did quite a lot of work on the Christianshavn district too. (WT-en) Sertmann 17:49, 1 October 2008 (EDT)

 * Merged Nord-Vest and Nørrebro, i tried expanding Nord Vest as a district in itself, but couldn't get it to work. And i think the new merged district, though a work in progress is turning out quite nicely. (WT-en) Sertmann 18:05, 18 October 2008 (EDT)

Wanted pictures
High quality pictures of...
 * Copenhagen Central station (under Get in)
 * Copenhagen Airport (under Get in)
 * OK, I will just some here for now. You can use the ones you prefer.

(WT-en) elgaard 14:44, 20 October 2008 (EDT)

More merging
I think the area surrounding Copenhagen is very messy, I would propose creating two new disticts in Copenhagen.

Vestegnen is incorrect. Vestegnen does not start at Frederiksberg at all, but after Valby and Sydhavnen. It includes the following areas: Albertslund, Ballerup, Brøndby, Gladsaxe, Glostrup, Herlev, Hvidovre, Høje-Taastrup, Ishøj, Rødovre, Vallensbæk
 * Nothern Copenhagen Covering the northern part of Storkøbenhavn, from Østerbro to a ring of Farum, Holte, Søllerød and Vedbæk including Lyngby,Charlottenlund, Klampenborg and Skodsborg
 * Vestegnen covering the south western part of Copenhagen, from Frederiksberg to a ring of Ballerup, Herlev, Taastrup and Greve (including Ishøj)

And in the Get out section list, and get some good articles on (and limiting work too) And then merging anything else in the north eastern part of Zealand, into a good Zealand article
 * Humlebæk for Louisiana
 * Helsingør Kronborg (merging with Nivå)
 * Nordkysten a regional article covering the beaches and towns on the northern coast (merging with Hundested)
 * Fredensborg for Fredensborg slot (including Nøddebo)
 * Hillerød Frederiksborg slot
 * Frederikssund For the Viking games
 * Roskilde Roskilde Cathedral, Lejre and the Viking ship museum
 * Køge For the old town and Vallø castle
 * Malmö for Malm¨hus etc.

That's the magic 9 :)

Thoughts? - (WT-en) Sertmann 08:07, 19 October 2008 (EDT)

 * not bad. We should not join Nivå with Elsinore, especially with Humlebæk between. I would prefer to have an Øresund Coast region from Tårbæk to Elsinore, Where do we put, eg Holte? --(WT-en) elgaard 15:07, 20 October 2008 (EDT)

 * I have no problem with that. But i still think a North Copenhagen district with Hellerup, Emdrup, Farum, Holte and Vedbæk or Klampenborg as it's corners - is the way to go. Even though it get's a bit large geographically, i think it's the best solution. (WT-en) Sertmann 21:02, 22 October 2008 (EDT)

 * OK, made the changes to the Northern suburbs], and left Strandvejen north of Klampenborg for you to do an edit of (note i've included Dyrehavsbakken in the district) but everything north of that is yours. [[User:(WT-en) Sertmann|(WT-en) Sertmann 10:25, 6 November 2008 (EST)

guide
is copenhagen ready for a guide status? keep smiling, (WT-en) Edmontonenthusiast 14:51, 30 October 2008 (EDT)

 * No, not yet - I'm still like 5 districts down before I come close to guide status - besides the main article is a sorry mess, which i don't intend to improve before i finish the districts :o)
 * Oh, I know what you mean, get all the information into the districts first. yaya:)!  I was just thinking, the article looked good, silly me, forgot to look at the districts.  Hmm well have a great day...oh where you are it is...11:01PM right?  So have good day tomorrow, heheheeh.  Keep smiling, (WT-en) Edmontonenthusiast 15:01, 30 October 2008 (EDT)

help wanted: place to stay for a couple with a baby
Maybe this place can help with recommendations?

I am looking for a hotel to stay with my wife and a 4 months-old baby in Copenhagen for New Year (something like Dec 28-Jan 7). The key thing we are looking for is "a place pleasant to spend many hours per day". We always loved family-run small pensions and villas with distinctive character and charm--and it would be great if we can find a hotel of no more than 100 rooms (10-20 rooms is even better). However, if there's a huge chain hotel where someone had really wonderful experience of spending much time with a baby--it would be also appreciated. The budget we are thinking is something like 800-1000DKK, if we understand the prices right. And, if it can help: here are some hotels that we really loved in the past--and that can fit our present needs:, ,. --(WT-en) DenisYurkin 18:10, 31 October 2008 (EDT)

 * Hey Denis. Since I live here i don't really stay much at Hotels. But the warm owners of the tiny (16 room) Hotel Rye, always comes with the warmest of recomendations - although, the bathrooms are shared, it doesn't seem like that much of a deal, since it has a feel of staying in the owners home - it's hard to beat in terms of uniqueness and atmosphere.

 * If you want something a bit more upmarket, Hotel Fox is cool, stylish and personal, and i have heard good things about it. If you are looking for something else, please let me know, and I'll try to sort you out. Also if you need a local guide one of the days, give me a shout, and i'll be happy to help, if I can make it fit. Remeber to print the wikivoyage guide - im hard at work on making it a jewel, and it should be pretty much up to speed by the end of December :) (WT-en) Sertmann 18:29, 31 October 2008 (EDT)

Thanks, Sertmann--your recommendations are great, you actually read my thoughts :-) Maybe only several things that I can add: BTW, how (un)typical is it to expect warm breakfast (like eggs, bacon, porridge etc) in a hotel? --(WT-en) DenisYurkin 05:23, 1 November 2008 (EDT)
 * it's my first time at Copenhagen, although my wife spent about 3 days there, several years ago
 * as we'll move around with a stroller, it'd be ideal if we reach most of the sights by foot, and to be able to return to the hotel at a short notice :-) -- so living in the downtown is the best option. In this sense, Hotel Fox is excellent
 * as for character and feeling, it's difficult to describe... Hotel Fox is bit urban and over-hitech/anime, uhm, cold?--more for younger people (iPod generation, you know :-) Rye looks personal, but may be on the other end of the age range, more for 50 years+? I mean, something more warm, personal, cozy than Fox (but not a grandma(?) style as Rye) would be just perfect.
 * pitifully, private bathroom are essential when you stay with a young baby--as you need to visit it multiple times per night
 * (and of course, EUR120 is better than 160EUR, but life is not always fair :-)

Well what about this place I found while doing some research for updating Amager - it looks nice, but I don't know anything about it.

 * Not quite your ordinary apartment rentals, in a 19th-century house situated a quite neighborhood. Features nice colorful rooms as the name might give away, and a lovely little garden

As for breakfast, don't expect it to be included unless explicitly noted somewhere - and DON'T expect warm breakfast. Except maybe for eggs, Danish breakfast is very much bread based - white bread with cheese or jam and Danish, is the most typical - typically served as a buffet. While a guess major chains would offer the standard French, English and continental breakfast sets. (WT-en) Sertmann 17:23, 2 November 2008 (EST)

 * Maybe the Bethel or Opera in Copenhagen/Indre_By (WT-en) elgaard 19:06, 4 November 2008 (EST)

 * House of Colors: I have stayed at House of Colors twice. The first time in 2002 when Gitte Kongstad was the proprietor and the second time this past summer (2009) under new ownership. Although the new owner is not as friendly and passionate as Gitte was, House of Colors is still a fantastic place to stay. It is 2 or 3 1 bedroom apartments w/ a full kitchen, dining table and a small living room. There is also a nice garden with tables and free use of old but serviceable bicycles. Within easy walking distance is the main beach, The Amager Center shopping mall with 2 grocery stores and other shops and the main street Amagerbrogade which has many small shops and restaurants including a great takeaway pizza joint run by Italians called Massimo The place is approximately 3 km from the town center. Walkable but a bit far to say it's an easy walk. There is a metro stop 100 meters away and frequent bus service. Christianhavn is a bit closer (1 to 1.5 km away) about halfway into the town center. But in Copenhagen, riding a bicycle is the way to go. Bike paths are everywhere and take you anywhere you want to go safely and quickly. Plus, when riding, you feel like a local and are inspired to ride all over the city and see things you never would walking or taking mass transit. I believe their website has been shut down and they are using facebook as their point of contact  Make sure you book early as they fill up quickly.

not in general to copenhageen
but how do you get those colour tabs beside the districts to make match the map? hmm i saw there was a code...keep smiling, (WT-en) ee talk 18:45, 5 November 2008 (EST).

 * I'd rather wait explaining this, til I get some responses from my post in the pub (WT-en) Sertmann 10:26, 6 November 2008 (EST)

 * Ok I saw that. Anyways, I'd like to know.  Maybe I should ask the creator of the map?  Keep smiling, (WT-en) ee talk 16:49, 6 November 2008 (EST).

 * Well, that would be me... (WT-en) Sertmann 17:28, 8 November 2008 (EST)

 * I mean the creator of the Edmonton one...Shaund! Duh, heheheh.  Happy first day of snow in Edmonton, (WT-en) ee  talk 14:48, 11 November 2008 (EST).

Copenhagen district map
I've experimented a bit with using the region map template on Copenhagen's district map - And would love to get some feedback. (WT-en) Sertmann 14:55, 1 November 2008 (EDT)
 * I saw that, Sertmann and I actually learnt from it. It is very interesting and VERYVERY well detailed from geo features to the transit lines ( I don't know what you guys use there-Light Rail, Passenger Rail, Subway...) but yeah!  Fantastic work!  keep smiling, (WT-en) Edmontonenthusiast 15:02, 1 November 2008 (EDT)

 * Tis a work of art, looks really, really nice... good work! The only thing I think is missing is a scale that shows distance – (WT-en) cacahuate  talk 21:15, 4 November 2008 (EST)

 * Looks really good. I was trying to do the same thing with Vancouver, but you've done it better! The only additional thing I'd like to see if I was using the map would be the names of some of the major streets. (WT-en) Shaund 21:35, 4 November 2008 (EST)

 * I second Shaund's comments. Great work Sertmann. (WT-en) Tarr3n 04:53, 6 November 2008 (EST)

Well thank you guys for the kind words, appreciated :) but what I really wanted a comment was using the region map template (i.e. the colored boxes before the district names and descriptions) on a city article. Does that confuse anybody? or is everything happy dandy? (WT-en) Sertmann 09:20, 6 November 2008 (EST)
 * Oh, Chicago already does that, and that's a star, so I think you're probably good to go. =)  (WT-en) LtPowers 16:44, 6 November 2008 (EST)
 * How do you do that Sertmann? I would love that for Edmonton.  Happy first day of snow in Edmonton, (WT-en) ee  talk 14:48, 11 November 2008 (EST).

Main article and districts
Just wanted to tip my hat at the work being done on the maps and the districts, they're looking great. Alas, the main page still needs a lot of work, with tons and tons of pointers to top attractions etc needed... (WT-en) Jpatokal 03:12, 13 November 2008 (EST)

 * Why thank you Mr Patokallio. My plan is to get the districts up to speed first, and then attack the front page. Which is why i nominated this for Collaboration of the Month sometime next year, cause I haven't got the first clue on how to save the main page. Also in talks with Mark on doing the remaining district maps as a Opensteetmap.org import in connection with that. Who knows, maybe it can reach WTPress standard sometime in the future (WT-en) Sertmann 03:28, 13 November 2008 (EST)

 * I'd like to say some thing similar. Sertmann, you have done a splendid job and Copenhagen will be the best article-well articles, in the Eastern Hemisphere!  Keep smiling, (WT-en) ee  talk 10:31, 13 November 2008 (EST).

 * I've noticed that a number of attractions listed (see Art for example) have been separated out of their bullet points, and that all relevant information, location, opening times, contact phone numbers etc. has been removed. The sections are much more difficult to read in this format, plus you need to buy a guide book, which seems to defeat the whole point of Wikivoyage! January 18th 2009 (WT-en) Spircle

 * Hmmmm I really don't know how to make it any clearer than writing "Complete listings can be found in the appropriate districts" and linking to the districts throughout the main article. Should that paragraph be copied into every subsection? a big disclaimer be written in the start of the article? or how do I make it more obvious? --(WT-en) Stefan (sertmann) Talk 13:13, 18 January 2009 (EST)

 * Apologies, I was used to finding all of the relevant information on the main page, and hadn't realised that it had since been sub-divided by district. There's an awful lot of text in the article, so it's easy to miss the link to the districts if you're only browsing one sub-section. I agree that it's probably best to leave it the way it is, rather than duplicating information, but if I get any better ideas, I'll let you know. (WT-en) Spircle 19 January 2009

Infoboxes
Swept in from the pub:

OK, this might be a bit specific for the pub, but I'd like some comments on the use of info boxes as I seem to be breaking the standard on some of my district articles

 * Copenhagen/Indre By
 * Copenhagen/Christianshavn
 * Copenhagen/Northern suburbs

I don't think I've turned the article into something akin to wikipedia, which seems to be the main concern - the function is mainly to separate out content, that don't really warrant it's own article, but don't really mix well with the main content either. Christiania in particular is a special case, since it's essentially a city within the city, but doesn't offer sleeping options - and doesn't have enough content (as of now anyway) to work as a separate district (same case as the Vatican I suppose).

I'll sweep this into the Copenhagen talk page once I've gotten some comments, and please don't worry about the images on the Christianshavn district, They're there merely as a place holder, until I finish up the article.

--(WT-en) Stefan (sertmann) Talk 13:10, 27 November 2008 (EST)

 * My take is as follows. The Tivoli infobox is appropriate, though I do think it should be trimmed down a little more. The Christiania infobox would work better as a district article of Copenhagen-- the "must-have-a-place-to-sleep" rule doesn't have to be rigid when it comes to districts with plenty to see, do and eat. The Mølleå river infobox could go either way-- if there is enough interesting information to be added it could potentially make an itinerary article. Otherwise it ought to be pruned and reworded a bit so as not to take up quite so much space. Hope that helps! (WT-en) Texugo 07:43, 28 November 2008 (EST)

Credit Card
Since I am lazy, can someone mention that credit card without embedded SIM card or PIN code does not work in Copenhagen, I've been there twice in 2008, very few stores are willing to accept my Master Card or Visa Card. (Excepts on the shops in Stroget the tourist area), simular experiences in Malmo, Roskilde, Helsingor, Hillerod. Luckily it's a nation with low crime rate on tourists, I always ended up carry lots cash, but with every meal cost about 200 Kr in the restaurants, buy transportation fare on cash, I ended up have to run to bank all the time. It is very strange, I talked to customer services on both Visa and Master Card, they said this is not possible and should be accepted, but it is. (WV-en) Kyle 10:10, 8 January 2009 (PST)

 * Denmark is pretty unique since the entire system is build around a unrivalled domestic card, the Dankort, which is universally used for domestic purchases - the card are usually a double issue Dankort/visa, where the visa part is only used abroad. Because of this the system is build up differently than in other countries, and this means - yes - pin only, and pretty much that other cards than visa/mastercard is only accepted very few places. However you should be fine at restaurants as they use swipe terminals, but that is pretty much the only place you can get by without a pin. (WT-en) Stefan 15:01, 8 January 2009 (EST)

 * What I meant was to mention this credit card situation in the Article page, so bring cash, tourists! (WT-en) Kyle 17:15, 8 January 2009 (PST)

 * Yeah, I realized, only thing is I'm not sure it should be included - so I left the explanation here, for others to use. Is Visa/Mastercards with[out] a pin a common occurrence anywhere? I've certainly never heard about it before. --(WT-en) Stefan (sertmann) Talk 11:38, 9 January 2009 (EST)

 * Bump, anyone?

 * It's spreading like cancer in Europe, but pretty much unknown elsewhere. Looking at my recent travels, it was ubiquitous in Finland, very common in Ireland, and unknown in eg. Germany, Luxembourg or anywhere in the Middle East/Asia.  Some Singaporean banks are introducing it now though.  See also Money. (WT-en) Jpatokal 13:06, 14 January 2009 (EST)

 * Just to clarify i meant withOUT a pin.... --(WT-en) Stefan (sertmann) Talk 13:38, 14 January 2009 (EST)

 * America still does not issue chip and pin and in fact many American cards are issues without a PIN at all, particularly business cards (presumably to stop people withdrawing cash with them). Unfortunately more and more places in CPH are switching to using the new black and red boxes that can only be used with a PIN. The clerk will have only two options - to let you enter the pin or to cancel the transaction. You used to be able to buy tickets from DSB (the train company) using a PINless card, but now they have also changed (late 2009).

Status
Work that needs be done before we can elevate Copenhagen to guide status

Currency
This article, and district-articles, is not according to MoS, regarding currency. (WT-en) ViMy 11:56, 15 May 2009 (EDT)

 * Damn you! I was really hoping no one would notice :) There is no established national standard for the Danish currency; Kroner/Kr/Kr./kr/,-/DKR/DKK are all used to varying degrees in local shops, but online DKK is almost exclusively used, so personally I think it's the one that makes most sense to use here. --(WT-en) Stefan (sertmann) Talk 18:06, 15 May 2009 (EDT)

 * I just checked through a lot of other Scandinavian cities, and NOK,SEK,ISK and EEK seemed to be used in all of them, maybe it comes natural, as a way to distinguish what sort of kroner/kronor we are talking about. I'll put this up in the currency talk page. --(WT-en) Stefan (sertmann) Talk 18:13, 15 May 2009 (EDT)

 * Sorry, to create a probem :) But it was a minor issue that had to be solved, since Copenhagen is soon up to Star-status. (WT-en) ViMy 11:35, 16 May 2009 (EDT)
 * There is an ISO standard. It is DKK (WT-en) elgaard 05:07, 18 May 2009 (EDT)

Literature
I was wondering what the literature section will be for. (WT-en) edmontonenthusiast [ee] .T.A.L.K. 15:32, 23 May 2009 (EDT).

Womex
Want to incorporate something about Womex ? – (WT-en) cacahuate  talk 16:44, 25 May 2009 (EDT)

Money
Shouldn't the "money" section of Cope be moved to Buy? (WT-en) Globe-trotter 06:24, 8 August 2009 (EDT)

Recent edits
Someone seems hell bent on introducing inaccuracies around the Copenhagen article; introducing false exchange rates and inflating prices unrealisticly, also it seems like the weird .com -> .co.uk changer guy is back. I may not be very keen on Wikivoyage anymore, but I'm not to happy about all my work being demoted either, So I'll try to check through the Copenhagen articles once a week or so, if unsure please leave edits unpatrolled and let me or Claus run through the changes. --(WT-en) Stefan (sertmann) talk 09:56, 22 March 2010 (EDT)

 * Glad to see you're still checking in! I too would hate to see the great work you put into these articles fall into decline. --(WT-en) Peter Talk 15:43, 22 March 2010 (EDT)

EDIT: Swebus tickets can no longer be purchased on the bus. Source: http://www.swebus.se/SwebusExpress_com/Customer_Service/FAQ/Buy-a-ticket/

The name of the place
Say, should we not create a redirect for Kopenhaven or something? --(WT-en) Faust 15:06, 12 October 2010 (EDT)

Wonderful Copenhagen!
OK now, the Eurovision Song Contest, the biggest live television event in Europe, is starting in Copenhagen TODAY (and will last for a week), with thousands of tourists arriving to the city already in its best season. Our articles on Copenhagen and its districts were once a paragon of high quality, but by now have sadly fallen behind and could use a little brush-up. I will be working on those all through the week and perhaps beyond it, also updating and researching what can be done on the spot once I arrive (I am the backing singer for Luxembourg this year - just joking). I could use some help on that though, as the amount of work is massive, so if you have some spare WV time on your hands and have not decided what to spend it on, here are a few proposals on what you can do: To do any of the above, you do not have to know Copenhagen. This is all common-sense and actually exploring stuff may be a cool way of getting to know the city and inspiring oneself to visit it one day. The information is amply available online and the trouble is not with finding it, but rather with the sheer manpower required to put it into articles. The city is already well districtified and articles organized, so it is more about a lot of small tasks than a paramount piece of work requiring lots of conceptual thinking. As I mentioned, I will keep on working, time permitting. Do let me know if you are joining the effort and what will be your focus, not to edit over oneselves. Mange tak! PrinceGloria (talk) 06:51, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Copyedit - some of the articles accrued a fair share of offhand comments, poor formatting and other sediment and need a good copyeditor's hand. You don't need to know Copenhagen at all to do this, moreover, you can learn about the city while copyediting
 * 2) Add photos - we do not have as many nice photos of Copenhagen in the Commons as I'd wish (the weather in the city can often not be very conducive to taking nice pics), but still, we use precious little of even what we have. It is hard to get a good idea of what to expect from Copenhagen and the particular districts now, so I believe we should scour the Commons (and the CC-licensed photos of Flickr) and try to illustrate the POIs and other stuff our articles cover.
 * 3) Update public transportation data - seems a bit tedious, but if you are planning on going to CPH, this can be worthwhile for yourself, and certainly adds a lot of value to the travellers. Movia's website is easy to figure out and doing a bit of research is a great way to wrap your mind around the city. We have to check ticket pricing, but also the line numbers, stops etc. and add/update info on how to get between certain parts of the city and POIs.
 * 4) Update hours, prices and descriptions - many POIs were last added in the past decade, and their hours, prices etc. may not be correct anymore. Moreover, some of the descriptions are woefully inadequate. This is not hard and you can add value by spending just a fe minutes on research and editing.
 * 5) Add coords and Dynamic Maps - CPH districts used to have brilliant static maps, but those maps got outdated as new POIs were added and some got closed, and now they are no longer relevant to their articles. While the dream thing would be for somebody to update the static maps, the more realistic expectation is for us to start updating the coords of the POIs and add Dynamic Maps while keeping the static variant as an option for those with JavaScript turned off.
 * Bump? PrinceGloria (talk) 10:45, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
 * I guess the Eurovision Song Contest mystifies our American editors :) (Actually it should mystify us Euro people too, but we all watch it anyway) Andrewssi2 (talk) 00:58, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Ah, good old Eurovision! We definitely should put at least some work into our Copenhagen article, though aren't we running out of time? I think the final's tomorrow! (I would encourage any editors who aren't blessed with this annual Euro-delight to search for it on YouTube and discover the wonder/horror for themselves!) :) --Nick talk 01:53, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Good to see 'Donatan & Cleo' got to the final! Good luck PrinceGloria! Andrewssi2 (talk) 02:12, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
 * We did miss this opportunity (insert unpleasant words here), but being in CPH now I see that we DO need to do a lot of work on that. I hope we manage to rally popular support behind the effort in the way we did for Munich, because we have a good base to work on. I am here until Monday, so I can do ground research and such. User:Andrewssi2, User:Nicholasjf21, will you #JoinUs? PrinceGloria (talk) 08:47, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
 * PS1. This year it is far from horror, we were discussing in the enormous queues to B&W Hallerne with people from other countries how there is nothing to laugh about anymore, almost all songs are good.
 * PS2. That said, tonight's interval acts are embarrassing and prove the Danes have little idea about what is sense of humour, so you may skip that and take a loo break (I saw them yesterday in the dress rehearsal).
 * PS3. I don't root for Poland actually, I hated the song (it got popular before it was even considered for the ESC), but people here seem to love it. I root for the Netherlands, as the song is great and every reason to visit the country is good. But I guess we may be going to Vienna (the Wiener takes it all), which would be a good reason to give our guide a few finishing touches!
 * I think you'll find that most people outside Europe are largely unaware of the scope of the Eurovision phenomenon, even if they're aware of the contest itself. I myself had never heard of it until a few years ago, and then only on Wikipedia. It just doesn't get any media attention here at all. Powers (talk) 21:26, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Err, Umerica isn't "most people outside Europe" 86.29.147.167 21:26, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Whatever people outside or inside Europe may think of Eurovision Song Contest, it surely DOES draw a major influx of tourists to a city that hosts it, both during, before and sometime after it. Therefore, we certainly should take note and make sure our articles on Eurovision destinations are up to date. We now have a year to brush up Vienna (which has had much done recently, but is a truly huge city with many districts and countless POIs, so needs a lot of attention and work still), and there is still work to be done regarding Copenhagen. Please join me in the latter as I seem to be the only one doing anything to what was once our flagship city guide. PrinceGloria (talk) 22:04, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Eurovision is well known in Australia for sure. East Asia not so much. Andrewssi2 (talk) 00:27, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Our guide to Copenhagen deserves our attention and quality editing. Discussing Eurovision not so much. PrinceGloria (talk) 04:41, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
 * All our guides deserve attention and quality editing. Furthermore, I don't find the discussion of Eurovision to be impertinent at all: my reading of it is that we're trying to determine, given that there are huge swaths of the Anglosphere that have little or no interest in Eurovision, how high a priority sprucing up host cities' articles on English Wikivoyage should be. It's a perfectly valid question. -- AndreCarrotflower (talk) 04:52, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Cities that hosted Eurovision say that they experience a surge of at least 60% in the number of visitors when they host Eurovision, and those are almost exclusively leisure travellers (and not e.g. business travellers going on a short business visit who would have much less interest in our guides). They also see sustained interest in their city due to extensive media exposure in the year they host. Usually, tourist infrastructure sees a major update and expansion when the Eurovision is planned to be hosted in a city, and thus our guides could use an update anyway. PrinceGloria (talk) 05:11, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Metro and S-tog not showing up
They are no where to be found on the dynamic map. How come? Hobbitschuster (talk) 03:02, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

Cars and parking
Even though this is a star rated article, I have still not found any information on how to get in with a car and how parking works. Philaweb (talk) 21:43, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

Second map (with rails)
This is not very good. "Northern Suburbs" ? (Nordsjjælland covers the entire of north-east Zeeland). Valby station is located at two different locations ! (south of Frederiksberg, but als west of Frederiksberg; suppose Vanløse was meant by maker.

Get in by bus
I have been blocked from updating this section — most of the companies listed have disappeared, or been merged into Flixbus.

I suggest updating the section with this content:

Ƕ (talk) 13:18, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

title: Talk:Copenhagen


text:
Talk:Copenhagen/Amager

Star nomination
Inspired by Marc's comment that some of our best guides are for places barely mentioned in regular guide books, I thought I'd give this nomination a go - aside from a short section on Dragør, LP doesn't have a single listing from this district in their guidebook. It suffers a little from being a really huge district (100km2/60mi2), but I don't think braking it up would work well, and 10 districts in a city of one million is already stretching it. My only major concern is the prose, so I would appreciate if you guys would go a bit deeper than skimming, and fix up the language where it's lagging. --(WT-en) Stefan (sertmann) Talk 09:54, 3 May 2009 (EDT)

 *  Almost support. I fixed up a lot of the grammar, although I might have missed some, but I think I got it all. Anyway, it's a great guide, but it's feeling a little lacking. The tiny intro to the article and the lack of a lead picture are particularly glaring, and there's no intros to the Eat and Drink sections. There's also some problems with the map - the main one is that it's too small. Even when I zoom in, I can barely read it. Also, none of the Contact listings are on the map. However, I think all these problems can be fixed up pretty quickly. To your immense credit, I don't see any obvious lackings of hours, phone numbers, or any of those little but crucial details in the listings, so you've one-upped Peter there. ;) (WT-en) PerryPlanet Talk 12:58, 3 May 2009 (EDT)

 * Hmmm, the intro was not that much smaller than say Anacostia's, but I tried expanding it a bit - though it feels like repeating he understand section a bit. Lead picture, yup, need to come up with something there. Wrote up a small intro in eat, and shuffled the intro to the drink section above the subheader. Contact listings were updated on the map, right before the nomination - you might want to refresh or something? As to the size of the map, I'm a bit at loss at what to do - should I just make a bigger svg export say 2000 pixel tall instead of the current 1200? --(WT-en) Stefan (sertmann) Talk 16:50, 3 May 2009 (EDT)

 * Yeah, but Anacostia's intro was criticized too. ;) Anywho, I see the Contact listings on the map now (huh, could've sworn they weren't there before). Making the map bigger isn't that hard - you can just select everything, hit Ctrl+Shift+M, click scale, enter a number (say "25", that'll probably do it) in both boxes and that'll enlarge it for you. (WT-en) PerryPlanet Talk 18:49, 3 May 2009 (EDT)

 * My bad, what I meant to ask was if increasing the size would be sufficient, or do I need to rework the map completely? --(WT-en) Stefan (sertmann) Talk 19:41, 3 May 2009 (EDT)

 * I think increasing the size of the map should be fine. It's a good map, it just needs to be a little bigger. (WT-en) PerryPlanet Talk 20:05, 3 May 2009 (EDT)

 * Agreed. Just increase the resolution, so it can be printed -- Wikivoyage Press recommends 1709x3008.  (You can shave off the green park bits to the west so make it fit this ratio.) (WT-en) Jpatokal 23:08, 3 May 2009 (EDT)

 * OK, I've resized the map to 1709x3008 --(WT-en) Stefan (sertmann) Talk 06:09, 4 May 2009 (EDT)

 * Looks good! I support now (although I would still like to see that lead pic, but that's not a crucial point). (WT-en) PerryPlanet Talk 13:18, 4 May 2009 (EDT)

 * Support. Shit island populated by Amaricans, eh? I hope this isn't some elaborate international put down. Great article, and I have trouble finding anything to cavil about. One that stands out is the description for Madeleines Madteater—I have no idea what it is, what it serves, why it's so unique, etc. I made a few minor corrections to fit publishing standards I'm familiar with, like using mdashes instead of hyphens for parenthetical usage, and spelling out numbers zero–twenty. This could be an undesirable Americanization, though—if it is, please revert. The last improvements I'm left wanting is to see the sleep section ordered by price—with nine, I think there are enough listings for this to be useful; and for a short intro in the Contact section (or short descriptions) explaining what the listings are for (do they all offer internet access?). --(WT-en) Peter Talk 08:12, 13 May 2009 (EDT)

 * Support. Great article. Agree with Peter, the sleep section could be ordered by price. (WT-en) ViMy 19:36, 16 May 2009 (EDT)

 * OK, so I sorted the sleep listings by price, and no - I'm not masterminding an anti American conspiracy - at least not in this regard :) As for Madeleines' they prepare and serve the food as a theatrical performance (there is a photograph and a more comprehensive description in English here) - but isn't that what the listing is already saying? --(WT-en) Stefan (sertmann) Talk 12:38, 19 May 2009 (EDT)

 * The listing says "staging the food as a theatre of sorts", which to me means they set the food up to resemble a small theater stage with curtains made out of lettuce and, I don't know, use puppets on it or something. Just a wording tweak should fix that up.  (WT-en) LtPowers 13:21, 19 May 2009 (EDT)

 * Hmm, I tried to rephrase it a bit, but I think it may just be a concept around which minds wrap with difficulty. --(WT-en) Peter Talk 14:09, 19 May 2009 (EDT)

Three weeks is up, last call for comments before putting a shiny star at the top of this one! --(WT-en) Peter Talk 17:04, 24 May 2009 (EDT)

 * Support. I love the neon monstrosity infobox! Just one quibble: pick a lead image for the article. There are worthy candidates in the body (excepting, of course, the aforementioned monstrosity). (WT-en) Gorilla Jones 17:52, 24 May 2009 (EDT)

 * Anybody ready to go final with this one? Just needs a lead image in my estimation. (WT-en) Gorilla Jones 17:18, 14 June 2009 (EDT)

 * It's now a star! --(WT-en) Peter Talk 01:25, 15 June 2009 (EDT)

Alternative banner for this article?
I created a new alternative banner for this article (I initially created it first and foremost so that it would be used at the top of the parallel article in the Hebrew edition of Wikivoyage, yet I later decided to also suggest that the English Wikivoyage community would consider using it here as well). So, which banner do you prefer having at the top of this article? ויקיג'אנקי (talk) 08:22, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
 * The alternative. Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:03, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
 * This is a tough one. I think I prefer #1 slightly over the suggested banner, since I prefer an above ground scene to one below ground or in a building. --Comment by Selfie City  (talk about my contributions ) 14:13, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Alternative banner has got those aesthetics. --ButteBag (talk) 23:16, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
 * This is a tough one. I feel the alternative banner is more attractive BUT I thought that Amager was an aquarium, not a district based on the image alone. I feel the original banner is better. DethDestroyerOfWords (talk) 13:49, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

title: Talk:Copenhagen/Amager


text: Talk:Copenhagen/Østerbro

title: Talk:Copenhagen/Østerbro


text:
Talk:Copenhagen/Christiania

District
Shouldn't this be Copenhagen/Christiania? (WT-en) Jpatokal 08:03, 13 January 2009 (EST)

Push for guide status
Per the Copenhagen starnom, it appears that we aren't sure what we need to do to get this article to guide status. I'd suggest a) a well developed understand section (this is a destination that deserves a good bit of context, I think), b) contact section (anywhere to check your email), and c) a see section. If absolutely necessary, the see section could be done away with and merged into a "See and Do" section. But perhaps listing a few of the more noteworth murals might be a good use of that section, a la Washington,_D.C./Adams_Morgan.

Other than those suggestions, I suppose the test of guide status for this article would be depth, i.e., having a comprehensive recommendation of listings, but I can't really comment on that for lack of knowledge. --(WT-en) Peter Talk 14:12, 2 December 2009 (EST)

 * What's really killing me is the see section, everything else is workable. But as for B) to the best of my knowledge there is nowhere to check your mail, or even a public telephone anywhere on Christiania. --(WT-en) Stefan (sertmann) talk 14:24, 2 December 2009 (EST)
 * If there is nothing to see and/or no contact facilities I think this should be mentioned as information useful to a traveller. Could save the hassle of looking for something that isn't there. (WT-en) Peter (Southwood) Talk 13:59, 3 December 2009 (EST)

 * I'll plug the artwork again—there are a lot of really interesting murals and sculptures throughout the town, many of which are likely on permanent public display. Marianne Rydvald seems to be the most famous muralist (and The Wishing Tree her most famous mural in Christiania).

 * I'm not finding enough information in English (and I most certainly can't read Danish!), but I doubt the topic is too obscure to be covered somewhere. Perhaps there is some book on this topic available at a Copenhagen library? Or you could call up a local museum office, or even send an email to Ms Rydvald, and let her know you are trying to create a nice, free little travel guide to Christiania's public art?  --(WT-en) Peter Talk 15:03, 3 December 2009 (EST)

For what it is, this article is looking like guide-quality to me—should we change the status & get on with the Copenhagen star nomination? --(WT-en) Peter Talk 12:18, 9 December 2009 (EST)

 * Yeah, I think so, I have a couple of things I need to check next time I'm in the area, but it's only 3 listings, which aren't that important. As it might show, I have a some reverence to the place, so I'm probably a bit too afraid of making mistakes :)

 * As for the artwork, it's a good idea (though 'The Wishing Tree' is in storage at the moment), I do plan on questioning a local next time I'm around. - --(WT-en) Stefan (sertmann) talk 13:20, 9 December 2009 (EST)

Present day Christiania
I'm pretty new here and don't want to go tearing apart a whole guide, but in light of recent events, a lot of the info here is out of date. Pusher street was torn down and all of the dealers removed. Residents ask that people buy their cannabis from other places and to not let it return to the way it was. The good news is you can also take pictures now. —The preceding comment was added by Blaizedm (talk • contribs)

 * Please plunge forward with factual edits! More experienced editors have no pride of place over new users with up-to-date information. Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:32, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

A selection of Page Banner for Christiania

A selection of page banners. I set Banner 2 as the current one. Hope you don't mind. --Renek78 (talk) 21:28, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Adding two more for consideration. -- SHB2000  (talk | contribs | meta) 10:14, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:36, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Christiania Street.JPG

title: Talk:Copenhagen/Christiania


text:
Talk:Copenhagen/Christianshavn

Images on Christianshavn
Why is there images at the bottom just listed (no offense) like crazy? They should be beside their listing or deleted. Keep smiling, (WT-en) ee talk 18:43, 10 November 2008 (EST).

 * They are waiting for the article to finish, so there will be room to add them in main the article (which there isn't for the moment on a widescreen resolution like i'm running at home). Christianshavn is the next target after Copenhagen/Northern suburbs is finished, so they won't be there for much longer. (WT-en) Sertmann 18:48, 10 November 2008 (EST)

 * Allright I just thought I'd bring it up. Keep smiling, (WT-en) ee  talk 18:50, 10 November 2008 (EST).

Bus line on Christianshavn
The article mentions that bus line 66 runs on Christianshavn, this is no longer the cases. On March 24, 2014 line 66 was replaced by a new bus line 9A. See press release (in Danish) here: http://www.mynewsdesk.com/dk/trafikselskabet-movia/pressreleases/ny-a-bus-paa-gaden-841057 So in the section on bus lines, it should read "9A" instead of "66".87.61.142.89 16:19, 5 December 2014 (UTC)PK
 * Please fix what's incorrect in the article. Thanks. Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:36, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:Copenhagen/Christianshavn


text:
Talk:Copenhagen/Frederiksberg

Check

 * Cevicheria Acapulco Tapas Bar (Peru) Rolighedsvej 10
 * Kartellet (Danish) Allégade 8 a
 * Visent (Polish) Åboulevarden 23
 * Noakhali (Bangladesh) Smallegade 20

title: Talk:Copenhagen/Frederiksberg


text:
Talk:Copenhagen/Kastellet

No longer called Frederiskhavn?
I have right in front of me the booklet which is given out free at the gate of the Citadel, and I received in June 2004. Publication date is 2001. The title is "THE CITADEL - FREDERIKSHAVN CITADEL" -- (WT-en) Paul Richter
 * "Frederikshavn Citadel" is a historic name, and it would be difficult to find anyone in Copenhagen that would know that name. I do not mind mentioning it as a historic name, but if a traveller were to ask for directions or get a taxi, "Frederikshavn citadel" would not work. --(WT-en) elgaard 14:42, 29 Jan 2005 (EST)
 * As long as it's still used in other contexts (historical or otherwise), it's helpful to let people (including local taxi drivers!) know that Frederkiskhavn and Kastellet are the same thing. Deliberately removing the information helps no one. -- (WT-en) Paul Richter 22:49, 29 Jan 2005 (EST)
 * It is not used in other contexts. Also Frederikshavn is a city in Jutland. But I happy with the current text. --(WT-en) elgaard 01:33, 30 Jan 2005 (EST)

title: Talk:Copenhagen/Kastellet


text:
Talk:Copenhagen/Nørrebro

Photos
Hi there. Im no expert on wiki-editing, but I live in Nørrebro and the first photo is NOT Nørrebroade but Søgade on the other shore of the lake. Hope someone can fix it. :-)--77.75.167.182 20:22, 3 June 2009 (EDT)

Guide?
I think it has the information mass for it, what do you think? Keep smiling, (WT-en) Edmontonenthusiast 12:17, 2 November 2008 (EST)
 * I like to think of them as finished before i make them guide, and I haven't quite finished the drink, sleep and contact sections just yet. But I think it's there in a day or two, and then it's on to Vesterbro :-) (WT-en) Sertmann 12:34, 2 November 2008 (EST)
 * Oh so cool, lemme know when your done;)! Keep smiling, (WT-en) Edmontonenthusiast 12:35, 2 November 2008 (EST).

To me it looks like a guide already, and you? Keep smiling, (WT-en) ee talk 18:24, 4 November 2008 (EST).

new cafe addition, excellent price -- I don't know how to edit the wiki well
cafe 22 on norrebro I went there on aug 8 2010. 79 crowns for excellent buffet. I don't know the danish names, but can vouch for the tastiness: croissants, eggs, american pancakes, sausages, meatballs, salmon with honey mustard, lots of fruit. has outdoor seating area along one of the lakes. my latte was excellent. Probably the best (food+ambiance)/price ratio I've seen the in the city

CAFE 22 Sortedam Dossering 21 2200 København N

View on map

Phone:35 37 38 27 Website:http://www.cafe22.dk Email:info@cafe22.dk

title: Talk:Copenhagen/Nørrebro


text:
Talk:Copenhagen/Norrebro

''This page is for discussing the corresponding article or guide. For more about using talk pages check out Project:Using talk pages.''

Comments
note to self: to get some substance into the see section, the many galleries around guldbergsgade could be an option. and remember to write a good stay safe section (WT-en) Sertmann 06:11, 17 October 2008 (EDT)

title: Talk:Copenhagen/Norrebro


text:
Talk:Copenhagen/Northern suburbs

''This page is for discussing the corresponding article or guide. For more about using talk pages check out Project:Using talk pages.''

Missing entries
Restaurants: -- --(WT-en) Stefan (sertmann) Talk 17:48, 19 November 2008 (EST)
 * Aldershvile Slotspavillon. http://www.slotspavillonen.dk/
 * Jægerhuset http://www.jaegerhuset.dk/

title: Talk:Copenhagen/Northern suburbs


text:
Talk:Copenhagen/North-West

 * http://www.dn.dk/sw3017.asp. danish-only link to Utterslev Mose.

title: Talk:Copenhagen/North-West


text:
Talk:Copenhagen/Vestegnen

Heya, need some English help, someone has been kind enough to "translate" what I wrote about the officers mess, into "This restaurant has it's home in the old chapel" except what I meant to refer to was the the officers old dining and drinking quarters, e.g. not like the catholic Mass, but the soldiery Mess - is this not the right word, or what am I doing wrong? --(WT-en) Stefan (sertmann) Talk 12:40, 7 May 2009 (EDT)

 * Mess sounds right to me, although "mess hall" might be clearer. --(WT-en) Peter Talk 16:45, 7 May 2009 (EDT)

title: Talk:Copenhagen/Vestegnen


text:
Talk:Copenhagen/Vesterbro

Check
Quite possibly nice cafés and restaurants you mention, but they are all situated on Frederiksberg rather than Vesterbro.
 * I know, wrong talk page, moved to Frederiksberg. Just couldn't be bothered as I didn't think anyone would actually check in here, been kinda alone on the humongous task of getting Copenhagen up to speed. --(WT-en) Stefan (sertmann) Talk 04:49, 24 January 2009 (EST)

Choice of midrange restaurants
Very good job on this quite exhaustive list. I just don't understand the choices of for instance tourist trap Reef'nBeef, the terrible mall buffet Cyprus and Senorita, possibly the worst Mexican in town, over Vesterbro classics as Strassen or Zakabona, or (deserved) food critics favorites like Cofoco, Spicylicious and Yanns Wok. Don't want to just change somebody elses hard work though.

 * Erm, those are mainly included because there are no other Australian or Greek restaurants on Vesterbro, and I wanted to include at least one of every kitchen out there. I've actually had some decent food on Señorita, and there are no other Mexican restaurants on Vesterbro that I know of. Strassen isn't included because it's rubbish, but feel free to add Zakabona on the budget section - I planned on adding some more café's there anyway. I had doubt's about adding Cofoco (another French) or Yanns (Another Chinese) to list to avoid making it to compressive, buuuut I guess it won't hurt anyone. --(WT-en) Stefan (sertmann) Talk 04:46, 24 January 2009 (EST)

 * Oh, and btw, could really use some help with the Buy section if you are a Vesterbro native, there are so many cool small shops, but I don't know the first thing about them. --(WT-en) Stefan (sertmann) Talk 04:53, 24 January 2009 (EST)

title: Talk:Copenhagen/Vesterbro


text:
Talk:Coping with a long trip

This was originally an article I wrote called "surviving a long trip" but I tried to come up with a better article name-- suggest something else if an alternative occurs to you.. (WT-en) Majnoona

 * "Copying" ties in nicely with the Cope section of our articles. -- (WT-en) Colin 19:13, 6 Apr 2005 (EDT)

title: Talk:Coping with a long trip


text:
Talk:Coral Gables

Plenty of info in first paragraphs, much accurate. But they read as though written by the Chamber of Commerce. Suggest revisions for objectivity by subject matter experts. John Henne hennejj@aol.com
 * We're not particularly trying for objectivity. We only strive to be fair.  (WT-en) LtPowers 11:27, 28 June 2009 (EDT)

title: Talk:Coral Gables


text:
Talk:Coral Springs

Goals/Non-Goals
A lot of good content here, but be sure to check out Project:Goals and non-goals and the Project:Manual of style. A lot of this information, particularly the list of media outlets, is encyclopedic style content that Wikivoyage does not incorporate into its articles, and will probably get removed in the future. --(WT-en) Peterfitzgerald Talk 16:00, 5 June 2007 (EDT)

title: Talk:Coral Springs


text:
Talk:Corcovado National Park

I'd question whether the park is "best" visited in the dry season, having just come back from a visit in the rainy season I'd say it was great, with very little problems caused by the rains.

 * "Travel to and through the park is perilous and is best accomplished during the dry season (January-March)"
 * So you had no trouble travelling to and through the park? Did you drive a better equiped vehicle or have any other advantages over the average traveller?  -- (WT-en) Ilkirk 13:18, 26 Aug 2005 (EDT)

title: Talk:Corcovado National Park


text:
Talk:Cordillera Blanca

Does this need to be a separate region?
Why not merge this into Northern Sierra (Peru)? Ground Zero (talk) 16:27, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Done. Some text was moved to Huascarán National Park. Ground Zero (talk) 16:13, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I redirected this to Central Sierra (Peru) instead, as the map of regions in Peru puts all of the non-coastal areas of Ancash Department in the Central Sierra region. Cobblet (talk) 02:25, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:Cordillera Blanca


text:
Talk:Cordillera Blanca Tour

La Paz, Bolivie, le 10/11/2008

Je soussigné, M. Fabrice PAWLAK, fabrice@terra-explora.com, directeur de Terra Group et associé de Terra Group, être l’ayant droit du contenu (textes et images) de tous les sites internet appartenant à Terra Group (Terra Patagonia, Terra Andina Bolivie, Terra Andina Pérou, Terra Brazil, Terra Maya, Terra Caribea, Terra Chile). Je donne par la présente mon autorisation de publier mes textes ou images, contenus sur mes sites internet, dans Wikivoyage. Je comprends qu'en faisant cela je permets à quiconque d'utiliser mon œuvre, de la copier, de la modifier ou de la réutiliser y compris à des fins commerciales.

Fabrice Pawlak Associé & coordination Terra Group www.terra-explora.com 00 591 22 410266 cel: 00 591 70518079 fabrice@terra-explora.com

title: Talk:Cordillera Blanca Tour


text:
Talk:Córdoba (city, Argentina)

Maybe the correct way of disambiguating this page, according to Project:Article naming conventions, would be Cordoba (city, Argentina) or Cordoba (city, Pampas) - what do you think? --(WT-en) Ricardo (Rmx) 07:51, 20 Feb 2006 (EST)

title: Talk:Córdoba (city, Argentina)


text:
Talk:Corfu

I'm starting to work on this article; it's my first stab at wikivoyage, so any help and/or advice would be appreciated! -Jane

Hello

Would it be possible to display a link to my web site from wikivoyage/Corfu to my web site which is Corfu replated and in return I will place a 88x31 button banner on my front page as a return link.

My details are:-

Title Corfu URL

Description Corfu, Holiday information and resort guide for the Island of Corfu, Including photo Gallery, Greek food, Travel guide

Thank you for taking the time to read this request

Regards

Alan

deleted http://www.officialroda.com. Seemed like an ad.

The first thing I'd suggest (assuming anyone is still reading this) is that you (both? all three?) format, sign, and date your Talk page comments properly. No one can tell who wrote the above, or when. The next thing I'd suggest is that everyone read the relevant Policy and Style pages (start with the Help link at left.) You'll find there for instance that links to other travel guide web sites are explicitly prohibited (unless they are the official site, meaning run by a government.)  (WT-en) Sailsetter 18:24, 3 October 2008 (EDT)

Copyvio
I can't tell if some of this is a copyvio or not and I'm not sure how far back to revert. Anyone got any insight? -- (WT-en) Sapphire • (Talk) • 16:36, 6 April 2009 (EDT)

Sleep listings
I was just detouting some of the sleep listings, which are absolutely lousy with touting, but actually, none of them should be in the article at all. I don't have the energy to move them tonight, but I may soon move all of them here as a temporary measure. Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:34, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

title: Talk:Corfu