text:
Talk:Los Angeles/Northwest

The term Eastside is innappropriate for the areas mentioned; the Eastside is on the east of the LA River, otherwise known as East LA. —The preceding comment was added by 69.235.59.58 (talk • contribs) 02:47, 13 December 2006

 * Can you suggest something more appropriate? I called it this to make it easy, since there's LA/West for the Westside... indeed the West is commonly known as the Westside, and the East maybe not so much, but actual East LA is probably of little interest to tourists, maybe I'm wrong, but I think it would be a long while before someone creates a travel guide for that area. (WT-en) Cacahuate 01:12, 13 December 2006 (EST)

 * P.S., I live in the MacArthur Park area, and I would definitely say that I live on the "Eastside" in conversation with people... unless a better name is proposed I say we leave this page where it is, and when the time comes we can create Los Angeles/East LA - there's room for both... (WT-en) Cacahuate 01:17, 13 December 2006 (EST)

 * I am not from LA but have witnessed this discussion elsewhere and I agree based on my knowledge of LA that Eastside is misleading (since there is an East LA). I think this section could simply be called Silverlake, Los Feliz & environs, or something like that. South of Griffith Park maybe? East/Central LA? East of Hollywood? —The preceding comment was added by (WT-en) Lyrae (talk • contribs)

 * Of those, I like East of Hollywood best, but I still don't think it's better than the current name. I do see your point, but I just don't think it's all that confusing... and the intro to the article makes it pretty clear what area it's covering – (WT-en) cacahuate  talk 23:52, 16 May 2007 (EDT)
 * As the term "Eastside" in reference to these areas is controversial and ethnically charged (and in fact originated as an ethnically charged term, referring to Los Feliz and Silver Lake as the farthest east of any areas in Los Angeles with a significant non-Latino white population in the early 1990s), it's best avoided. However, as a compromise, how about "Northeast", which is the name of the LAPD division that serves Los Feliz, Silver Lake, Echo Park, Atwater Village, Highland Park, etc. and thus does have officially recognized connotations? (I realize that parts of the area covered fall under the jurisdiction of the LAPD's Rampart and Wilshire divisions, but the overwhelming majority is in Northeast). 71.106.208.70 17:00, 27 June 2007 (EDT)

I support keeping the term "Eastside". Even though the geographical boundaries of both the Westside and the Eastside have shifted steadily westward in the last few decades, we have to recognize that both residents of "Eastside" communities (including Westlake, Echo Park, Silver Lake, Los Feliz, etc.) and residents of other LA communities tend to agree that the Eastside is basically anything east of Vermont Avenue (and sometimes even a little bit west of Vermont), including Downtown LA. There's no need to invent foreign terms for this area. --(WT-en) SameerKhan 08:22, 6 July 2007 (EDT)
 * So does that mean that it's OK to use ethnically and racially charged names for other areas of Los Angeles and other cities on Wikivoyage? SameerKhan, would you be into giving South Central/South LA some racial/ethnic term on Wikivoyage as well (perhaps even involving the "n-word"), or other parts of LA. There's no need to use racially/ethnically charged names here. At least Northeast has some official use. 64.183.77.40 15:22, 20 July 2007 (EDT)

 * Yes, following the obviously ethnically-motivated example of a name like "Eastside" it's clear that we should strive for the most offensive names possible, including your example of "n-word" names. We already have other racially charged article names that use some version of "Northeast", "South", etc, so clearly we're fast approaching the goal of being the most offensive travel site possible.

 * Sarcasm aside, if anyone has an alternative name for this article please suggest it and explain why it's more appropriate, but implying that editors here had racial motivation for naming an article something like "Eastside", or even that such a name has racial undertones, is an argument that's offensive to the contributors and unlikely to be taken seriously. I live in LA, and east side and west side are common terms, and if you look at a map (especially the symbol that looks like a compass) it's pretty easy to figure out why. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 16:00, 20 July 2007 (EDT)

 * "Northeast" is appropriate, given its official use as the name of an LAPD division which happens to cover the areas in question. .  I'm from L.A. originally and the term "Eastside" was NEVER used in regards to Los Feliz, Silver Lake, or Echo Park until the early 1990s - and then in reference to Los Feliz (which has had a white non-Latino majority throughout its existence unlike neighboring areas) and Silver Lake as being the "east side" of "white L.A.".  If you look at a map, East L.A. is the East Side. Now, if this site was covering Boyle Heights, El Sereno, and Lincoln Heights, then the name "Eastside" would be appropriate ; however those are areas that don't have much of interest to tourists (there are actually a few interesting places in Boyle Heights but safety is a definite problem). As it is right now, the article is one step away from an article about South Central/South L.A. using the "n-word" or an article about West L.A. using anti-semitic terms. —The preceding comment was added by 71.118.53.69 (talk • contribs) 16:24, 15 August 2007

The reason we can't figure out a blanket term for this region is that it is not, by any means, a region. MacArthur Park, Pico-Union, and other neighborhoods south of the 101 are very different from Silverlake or Los Feliz (or even Echo Park), and there's no reason they're discussed in the same article. I think the parts of this article relating to neighborhoods south of the 101 to Melrose should be linked up with Koreatown and other neighborhoods that might be described as mid-Wilshire or midtown/mid-City into some larger West of Downtown article, while everything else should become part of an article called Greater Silverlake or something along those lines. Opinions? (WT-en) Kawkabalsharq 19:36, 24 February 2008 (EST)

Agreed, as a Los Angeles native, that "Northeast" should be used to describe this area. The only people I have ever heard refer to Silverlake or Los Feliz as the "Eastside", are folks from West LA who never go east of Fairfax anyway. "Eastside", as previously mentioned, pretty much always means "East LA", the area east of the LA River. The only exception I can think of is if you're talking about Long Beach.~D —The preceding comment was added by 206.169.110.242 (talk • contribs) 17:11, 26 February 2008

Changed Definition of East L.A.
It's not my prerogative to enter the "Eastside" debate, but Eagle Rock and Highland Park aren't "East L.A." by even wikivoyage's own admission. The "Eastside" page links to at least one restaurant in Eagle Rock. I've replaced the description of the dividing line as the I-5 to the Los Angeles River, and edited the neighborhoods of East L.A. to include Lincoln Heights, El Sereno, and Boyle Heights.--(WT-en) Guero57 19:36, 17 May 2010 (EDT)guero57

This section needs to be changed to Central Los Angeles
This is completely wrong being called the Eastside. East LA is an unincorporated part of LA County, Boyle Heights and Lincoln Heights next to it are not East LA. A cursory reading of local history and local usage will show you that this fake and new "Eastside" term is just wrong, used only by recent transplants to this city, and will confuse travelers. Consider going with the categories our local paper thinks are accurate: http://projects.latimes.com/mapping-la/neighborhoods/ —The preceding comment was added by 75.79.38.105 (talk • contribs) 04:51, 8 July 2011

title: Talk:Los Angeles/Northwest


text:
Talk:Los Angeles/South Central

''This page is for discussing the corresponding article or guide. For more about using talk pages check out Project:Using talk pages.''

"Violence-Prone?"
I had to change the headline for the article "South Central is a violence-prone section of Los Angeles." It is a racist caricature of this neighborhood that houses two icons of American art (Watts Towers and Randy's Donuts) and is definitely worth visiting. And South Central is not the most well-known ghetto in the US, I would argue Harlem is.(WT-en) Khuryps 23:16, 17 November 2007 (EST)

 * Bad as this article gets, the link to in in the main L.A. article is even worse. Of course there are risks that tourists need to be forewarned about, but it needs to be done in a balanced way.  There are also some noteable eateries in So Central.  I'm not up on that anymore, but I hope someone who is can write it up.  76.168.50.104 06:18, 6 August 2008 (EDT)

 * Yes, South Central comes with a lot of baggage... but feel free to help in any way you can :) – (WT-en) cacahuate  talk 23:59, 6 August 2008 (EDT)

The claim that SC is comparable to Baghdad is ridiculous. I'm deleting it.
 * Project:Plunge forward! -- (WT-en) Colin 03:18, 13 January 2009 (EST)

 * Agree, thanks for removing that, I try to keep this section sensible as it's a magnet for sensational hearsay, but that one got past me! – (WT-en) cacahuate  talk 03:43, 13 January 2009 (EST)

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Talk:Los Angeles/South Central


text:
Talk:Los Angeles/West

This article seems to have been left around since we decided on the Southern California hierarchy. I don't know if it's got information in it, but if so, it needs to be merged to the correct region article, West Side (Los Angeles County). Once that's done, it should be redirected to the West Side article. --(WT-en) Evan 13:06, 21 December 2006 (EST)

 * Actually it was started later, which is originally why i moved stuff here since it seemed to be the popular one... the other had hardly been touched since 2003. It's kind of a tricky one. I see the logic you were working with in 2003 when trying to divide up LA County, so it seems that West Side (Los Angeles County) is from that. But in trying to make an article about LA the "city" (in quotes because that's a hard term to define) there is definitely a 'Westside' that may differ and is definitely part of LA city. For instance where do listings for Palms, Sawtelle, Century City, Westwood, West LA (a small district on the Westside, near the Getty), Brentwood, Pacific Palisades, Bel-Air go? To the best of my recollection they are all districts of the city of LA. Yet separated from say, La Brea Ave area that is also part of the city of LA by some actual cities like West Hollywood and Beverly Hills. I don't think that they necessarily currently all require their own articles, so my logic would be to describe all that in Los Angeles/West, since they are indeed districts of LA city (someone correct me if I'm wrong about citihoods).

 * My thoughts for the city of LA, longer term:

 * Los Angeles/Downtown
 * Los Angeles/Hollywood
 * Los Angeles/East (silverlake, echo park, koreatown, etc)
 * Los Angeles/East LA (an actual district of the city east of downtown, but I'm not sure that it will need an article - just mentioning since someone brought it up on the LA/East talk page)
 * Los Angeles/Venice - currently at Venice (California), but also part of LA city.

 * Other areas that may need district pages: Mid-Wilshire, Melrose, Pico area... If LA is going to fit into the existing Project:Huge city article template then no actual listings should be on the top city page... meaning we'd need to figure out something for the above areas and more. Maybe a Los Angeles/Central (I don't like that, but maybe someone has a better idea for name) that can encompass the areas between Fairfax and La Brea/Highland, and around Santa Monica Blvd, Melrose, Beverly Blvd, Third Street... And Hancock Park, don't know if there's anywhere to stay, but certainly stuff to eat and do...

 * From the city point of view, I don't see Malibu as part of the Westside, I think most think of that as it's own entity. Same with Agoura Hills and surrounds.

 * Nearby cities that should and do have their own articles:
 * West Hollywood
 * Beverly Hills
 * Santa Monica
 * Malibu
 * Culver City

 * Re: the southern part of the city, I don't know as much about that. Currently there's a Los Angeles/Harbor Area, but everything listed on it are actual cities, and not districts of LA city. Probably better to stick with South Bay (Los Angeles County). But I don't know in the south what parts are actual cities and what are districts of LA City.

 * Same with Marina del Rey and Playa del Rey...

 * Thoughts? (WT-en) Cacahuate 03:18, 22 December 2006 (EST)

 * Also, regarding the previous discussion at Southern California hierarchy the link to the LA regions page is now broken, but I found this on their website, which may be what was being referred to. It shows all of LA city from downtown to the beaches as the "Westside of Los Angeles County" - but again, that drastically differs from what Angelenos would call the "Westside". So I'm thinking there's a need for both pages to exist. Also in that conversation it seems agreed that the parts of Los Angeles County that are distant from downtown, but still technically part of Los Angeles should use the district format, like Los Angeles/Hollywood... (WT-en) Cacahuate 03:42, 22 December 2006 (EST)

 * So unless anyone disagrees with the above I'm gonna expand this article to encompass LA City's westside districts soon and move listings from other pages to here and remove the merge tag... (WT-en) Cacahuate 01:43, 26 December 2006 (EST)

Check my article
Comments welcome for Los_Angeles/Palms. It is not yet complete, but it is a start. Thank you. (WT-en) GeorgeLouis 12:12, 7 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Wait, a subdistrict? Is there anything there that wouldn't work just as well as part of the Los Angeles/West article?  (WT-en) LtPowers 14:11, 7 July 2008 (EDT)

Urban Outfitters
I've deleted Urban Outfitters as a */buy/* listing. I think this qualifies under the #Boring Places policy as a chain, especially in this area with a lot of unique locations. —The preceding comment was added by MisterCustomer (talk • contribs)
 * American Apparel and Buffalo Exchange probably also qualify since they are chains, although it may make sense to leave them for now since the section would otherwise be empty. However, if the section expands then removal of those two would also make sense. -- Ryan • (talk) • 23:09, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
 * I smell a personal project coming my way. I should be able to provide some better content if and when I can put some brainpower on it. Satisfied to let it ride without better options, but "Challenge: Accepted!" -- MisterCustomer (talk) 23:41, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
 * I think there's still room for improvement, but I've tried to break this down by location, similar to how the listings are organized in Santa Monica. There are a lot of unique stores within those locations, but I think this makes more sense than a West L.A. Mega List. In the same vein, there are a lot of good restraunts not listed, but I'm hesitant to start adding to the already-bulky mid-range category. This district covers such a broad area, might it be preferable to organize geographically rather than by price? I'm probably not going all the way to Beverly Crest if I get hungry in Mar Vista. -- MisterCustomer (talk) 20:55, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

title: Talk:Los Angeles/West


text:
Talk:Los Angeles/Wilshire

Museum of Tolerance
Is it accurate to say the Museum of Tolerance is in Wilishire? I'd say it is more in Beverlywood or perhaps extended Culver City. —The preceding comment was added by (WT-en) 99.177.184.181 (talk • contribs)

 * The museum is more-or-less in Beverlywood, but at the moment our guides treat that neighborhood as part of LA city. Since LA is unusual in that it incorporates several pseudo-independent cities we really need to create a map to indicate what each of our various LA articles are and what they cover - any who wants to jump on Project:How to draw a map and start this out is welcome to. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 11:55, 11 July 2010 (EDT)

title: Talk:Los Angeles/Wilshire


text:
Talk:Los Angeles County

Massive List
I added a massive list of cities to work on. They need to be migrated to the subregions by anyone familar with which subregion they belong to. -- (WT-en) Colin 18:56, 28 June 2006 (EDT)

 * I got it down to the following, so if anyone knows where these go please include them in the appropriate sub-region. I'm wondering if Commerce should be the City of Commerce?

 * Bradbury
 * Commerce
 * Cudahy
 * Signal Hill
 * South El Monte

 * -- (WT-en) Ryan 19:48, 28 June 2006 (EDT)

 * Yeah, Commerce and City of Commerce are the same thing -- check out the city logo at WikiPedia:Commerce, California. I caught the same problem with City of Industry which is technically Industry, California. -- (WT-en) Colin 19:51, 28 June 2006 (EDT)

 * OK, with the help of Google Maps I think that finishes it. There were a few border cases, and something as far up the coast as Malibu might be better in its own region, but this should be good enough. -- (WT-en) Ryan 20:02, 28 June 2006 (EDT)

 * Google Maps? Google Earth is the best video game evar. -- (WT-en) Colin 20:04, 28 June 2006 (EDT)

West Side
I (and other local reseidents) would distinguish between the Westside and the Beaches - roughly divided east and west of Interstate 405. Haven't made the change yet, am considering.--(WT-en) Justfred 18:37, 4 October 2006 (EDT)

 * Hey Fred, I just saw this after I made some little changes, sort of... there seemed to be 2 pages covering the same thing - Los Angeles/West and West Side (Los Angeles). The former obviously grew from expanding the LA city article, while the latter made from working down and creating regions from LA County. LA the city is sort of a tough one to districtify, since the city itself is so oddly shaped and so integrated into the random areas that have been given their own cityhood like West Hollywood, etc.

 * So I moved all the info to Los Angeles/West, as I think that it makes more sense for the traveler to treat that as a region of the city. I think I agree about distinguishing between the beaches and the Westside also. I'm also wondering if West Hollywood is indeed part of the westside, since it sort of straddles the line physically and consciously. Mid-Wilshire is definitely not part of the Westside.

 * Anyway, just thought I would continue your discussion here before I put anymore work into that page... (WT-en) Cacahuate 12:28, 21 December 2006 (EST)

 * Hi. We worked this out a long time ago on Talk:Southern California/Hierarchy, which has a lot of great info. Please keep West Side cities in West Side (Los Angeles County) rather than as a pseudo-district in Los Angeles/West. I realize that there are a few dupes still lying around for some broken hierarchies -- especially ones that consider everything in Southern California as parts of the city of Los Angeles. --(WT-en) Evan 12:47, 21 December 2006 (EST)

 * I responded here: Talk:Los Angeles/West (WT-en) Cacahuate 03:31, 22 December 2006 (EST)

title: Talk:Los Angeles County


text:
Talk:Lospalos

VFD Discussion
Speedily delete. Nonsense. —The preceding comment was added by (WT-en) Roundtheworld (talk • contribs)

 * Keep. I deleted the nonsense and moved it to Lospalos, which is the correct name of the East Timor town (it is often misspelled as Los Palos). --(WT-en) Peter Talk 10:31, 29 December 2010 (EST)

Result: Kept. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 19:45, 14 January 2011 (EST)

title: Talk:Lospalos


text:
Talk:Los Suenos

''This page is for discussing the corresponding article or guide. For more about using talk pages check out Project:Using talk pages.''

Comments
There is a Los Suenos (or Los Sueños) resort hotel is listed in the Jaco (city) article. Jaco is less than 10 km from the resort, so I question the need for a separate article that will probably only ever have one, or possibly 2 listings. There seems to be only room for one resort hotel at this location, so having an article merely listing all the facilities for one business would seem redundant. - (WT-en) Huttite 20:09, 2 January 2010 (EST)

title: Talk:Los Suenos


text:
Talk:Louisiana

French
Is it appropriate to say that French is still spoken in South Louisiana?
 * Parts of South Lousisiana, yes, especially to the South West-- though how close Louisiana Cajun dialect is to what a Parisian considers proper French is another matter. -- (WT-en) Infrogmation 13:27, 17 Oct 2005 (EDT)

Regions
How many regions are there in Louisiana? I can see at least two referred to in the existing article, namely. So I am adding these as regions. Are there any more or different ones? -- (WT-en) Huttite 17:52, 25 Dec 2005 (EST)
 * North
 * South

Why do we need these? None of the cities have isIn for these regions, only for Louisiana. There are no region-specific pages. Should there be? As an outsider, the only region in Louisiana I've heard of would be "the bsyous". I'm inclined to delete regions entirely. Other opinions? (WT-en) Pashley 20:42, 1 May 2006 (EDT)

 * There are hundreds of towns and cities in Louisiana -- far too many to link to from this page. One way we can do regions is to organize towns and cities by "parish" (Louisiana's equivalent of a county) and then organize the parishes into thematic clusters (greater New Orleans, "Cajun Country" or "Acadiana", etc.). --(WT-en) Evan 21:15, 1 May 2006 (EDT)

 * I agree we need more regions and a plan. We can add/change isin's later. My suggestion is to use the state's tourism agency's five regions from this map(double click "Search Regions") and then further divide by parishes. Not sure the names are quite what we want in all cases. Suggestions. (WT-en) OldPine 15:47, 19 September 2007 (EDT)
 * Hearing none I've installed some regions as used at Wikipedia. Will let this set here for comment before building it out. (WT-en) OldPine 15:04, 2 October 2007 (EDT)

"South"
I've moved the "South (Louisiana)" article to Acadiana as being more appropriate and how the region is labeled on the map. Note we have a separate article on the Florida Parishes, so no need to treat them in that article too. (WT-en) Infrogmation 20:31, 28 August 2011 (EDT)

City list should not be a table
An anonymous user is trying to change the city list in this article to the following table below. They probably do not realize this is non-standard, therefore I am creating this section on discussion page for them to discuss their viewpoint should they wish. Andrewssi2 (talk) 05:36, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

HEADING: Cities HEADING: Major

Region names
Anyone mind if I move North (Louisiana) and Central (Louisiana) to North Louisiana and Central Louisiana, respectively? The parentheses seem unnecessary in this case. Eco84 (talk) 18:54, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Well, unless someone wants to do a rewrite of the two region articles under the new names in order to get rid of the WT link. Eco84 (talk) 18:56, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Please go ahead with the rename - the names you've proposed better match standard practice. -- Ryan • (talk) • 19:49, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Alternative banner for this article?
I created a new alternative banner for this article (I initially created it first and foremost so that it would be used at the top of the parallel article in the Hebrew edition of Wikivoyage, yet I later decided to also suggest that the English Wikivoyage community would consider using it here as well). So, which banner do you prefer having at the top of this article? ויקיג'אנקי (talk) 05:21, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

 * As interesting an ecosystem as the bayous are, I've gotta go with the jazz festival. Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:25, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

 * Please! Replacing the trumpet is really poor judgement.
 * There might be an alternative destination article for the bayous though. --Andrewssi2 (talk) 13:03, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Dude, that's a trombone. =)  Powers (talk) 18:18, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. Danapit (talk) 18:49, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. JuliasTravels (talk) 21:11, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. Kaldari (talk) 00:40, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

 * Did not we have a kind of policy about not focussing on people or something? Anyway, neutral. Syced (talk) 09:15, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

title: Talk:Louisiana


text:
Talk:Louisville

I don't think an exhaustive list of local radio and tv stations is one of our goals. I've moved this list here for reference. (WT-en) Maj 12:41, 26 December 2006 (EST)

FM

 * FM 88.5 WJIE Christian music
 * FM 89.3 WFPL NPR news
 * FM 91.9 WFPK Public station with a wide variety of music
 * FM 90.5 WUOL Classical
 * FM 93.1 WTFX The Fox Rock
 * FM 93.9 WJIE Christian Music
 * FM 94.3 WULF The Wolf Country
 * FM 94.7 WFIA Christian Talk
 * FM 95.7 WQMF Classic Rock
 * FM 96.5 WGZB B-96 Rap and hip-hop
 * FM 98.9 WZKF Kiss Top 40/hip-hop
 * FM 99.7 WDJX Top 40
 * FM 100.5 WLUE Louie FM Various
 * FM 101.3 WMJM Majic 101.3 Soul
 * FM 101.7 WLPP Spanish Language
 * FM 102.3 WXMA The Max Current music
 * FM 103.1 WRKA Oldies
 * FM 103.9 WPTI Country
 * FM 104.3 WLRX New Rock
 * FM 105.1 WLRS New rock
 * FM 105.9 WRVI The River Christian music
 * FM 106.9 WVEZ Lite 106.9 Soft Rock
 * FM 107.7 WSFR Classic rock

AM

 * AM 530 Local Information & Traffic
 * AM 620 WTMT Spanish Music
 * AM 680 WDRD Disney Radio
 * AM 790 WKRD Sports
 * AM 840 WHAS Full Service
 * AM 900 WFIA Christian Talk
 * AM 940 WCND Oldies
 * AM 970 WGTK Great talk
 * AM 1040 WLCR Catholic radio
 * AM 1080 WKJK Talk
 * AM 1240 WLLV Gospel
 * AM 1350 WLOU Gospel
 * AM 1450 WAVG Classic country
 * AM 1570 WWSZ ESPN Radio
 * AM 1600 WTSZ ESPN Radio

Television

 * WAVE 3 NBC (6 on cable)
 * WBKI 28 CW (7 on cable)
 * WBNA 21 i Network (21 on cable)
 * WDRB 41 Fox (9 on cable)
 * WHAS 11 ABC (4 on cable)
 * WJYL 45 TBN
 * WKPC 15 PBS/KET (13 on cable)
 * WKMJ 68 KET-2 (15 on cable)
 * WLKY 32 CBS (5 on cable)
 * WMYO 58 My TV (10 on cable)
 * WYCS 24 Community station (138 on digital cable)

Places to Eat
Removed Carly Rae's since it is no longer in business: http://www.wineloverspage.com/forum/hotbytes/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=7933&start=0 —The preceding comment was added by 96.28.49.68 (talk • contribs)
 * Thank you. You can feel free to mention that sort of thing in your edit summary when you make a change.  =)  (WT-en) LtPowers 08:58, 9 November 2009 (EST)

District articles?
Since there are no links to any, shouldn't the notice that there are such articles be deleted for now? (WT-en) Ikan Kekek 18:20, 24 June 2012 (EDT)

Dive bars in Louisville?
Is this paragraph necessary? All cities the size of Louisville have seedy dive bars, where you can probably find "mishmash, smattering of local color jabber-banter" (whatever that is). Louisville's aren't unique.Beeelb (talk) 15:04, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

"If you're the voyeur type, a Tom Waits fan, unexposed and looking for some culture shock, or just want to connect with some real locals, you might check out the forty or so hole-in-the-wall bars scattered throughout Smoketown, Germantown, Shelby Park, and Downtown. These places can range from extremely seedy (could get accosted) to the utterly laidback (ability to enjoy your malt 40 with cheap soulfood and the occasional mishmash, smattering of "local color" jabber-banter). Not for the faint of heart."

Pronunciation
Congratulations to whoever wrote the 'How to pronounce the name' infobox, it's really excellent.

Just to push things one step further, could it be stated how "Derby City" is pronounced? As a Brit, I'd naturally say "DAR-bee", but something tells me "DUR-bee" is more likely to be the right answer. Probably worth addressing.--ThunderingTyphoons! (talk) 20:18, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

 * Hmm. You're right, in that the word "derby" is always pronounced DAR-bee in British and DUR-bee in American. That's true whether it's an uncapitalized noun or a proper name. (I noticed this difference listening to Stephen Fry in Stephen Fry in America and QI, and also Monarchy: The Royal Family at Work when Queen Elizabeth and her entourage came to the Kentucky Derby. I was a little surprised that none of the Americans in those documentaries confused by the different pronunciation; maybe staff who are senior enough to be interacting with the Queen have just learned about this pronunciation difference, but also they probably would have cut out any "Huh? What's a 'darbee'?" moments from the documentaries.) I guess a note probably would be helpful. --Bigpeteb (talk) 17:18, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

title: Talk:Louisville


text:
Talk:Loutraki

I do not recommend Hotel Segas. I'm going to Greece in 3 weeks and I tried to make a reservation with them. After several Emails and phone calls (during Greek business hours.) I was still unable to get any sort of confirmation about my room. I canceled my reservation with their online form, but I got no confirmation of cancellation either. I wound up making a reservation with Galaxy Hotel Loutraki.

title: Talk:Loutraki


text:
Talk:Loveland (Colorado)

''This page is for discussing the corresponding article or guide. For more about using talk pages check out Project:Using talk pages.''

History
I don't know how common a brief city history is, but I think in this case it helps explain the current culture/economy. Maybe not. I'll work on fleshing out the "understand" portion over the next week. ((WT-en) Rizzle 00:25, 19 March 2008 (EDT))

 * Great, keep up the good work! --(WT-en) Peter Talk 01:09, 19 March 2008 (EDT)

title: Talk:Loveland (Colorado)


text:
Talk:Loveland (Ohio)

This article was the ten thousandth article added to Wikivoyage; see Project:Milestones. --(WT-en) Evan 00:20, 12 July 2006 (EDT)
 * Well, well, well. Seems mundane Loveland, OH has its place in history. I guess that means I can't let this just be an outline or usable article. I'll do my best to make this a star or at the very least a guide. Luckily, I live only four - ten miles from the city. -- (WT-en) Andrew Haggard (Sapphire) 00:42, 12 July 2006 (EDT)

I live in Loveland, and I've been maintaining the Wikipedia article, so I might get around to expanding this article too. – Minh Nguyễn 22:39, 13 July 2006 (EDT)

Reference
For anyone other than myself or Minh Nguyễn who would like to help get the 10,000th article in shape the following website(s) could prove extrememly useful.
 * CIN Weekly, is a weekly magazine with info on bars, restaurants, and activities in the Greater Cincinnati area. Usually, you can get reviews for bars and restaurants by filtering through the communities. -- (WT-en) Andrew Haggard (Sapphire) 04:22, 15 July 2006 (EDT)

To do
http://www.paulsturkeysencore.com/locations/

title: Talk:Loveland (Ohio)


text:
Talk:Lovers Key

I think this article is poorly named. It possibly should be called Lovers Key rather than Lovers Key State Park. Before moving though, read and understand Project:Article naming conventions and Project:What is an article first. If anyone thinks the existing or some other name is a better name then explain it to me. -- (WT-en) Huttite 18:51, 25 Dec 2005 (EST)

title: Talk:Lovers Key


text:
Talk:Lovina

Jax bar has closed down (WT-en) Baliexpat 02:33, 27 February 2011 (EST)

Villas, private holiday house
Hi (WT-en) Baliexpat, it is customary to discuss new holiday rental listings, or the establishment of a section for holiday rentals such as apartments and villas. Please have a read of the article on establishing rental listings

Wikivoyage is neither an apartment-finder service nor a real estate listing service, so in general real estate and rental agency listings are not allowed. The only exception to this rule is for locations where rental properties are a common form of travel accommodation and the following requirements are met:

If consensus is achieved, rental agency listings must be placed into a separate sub-section of the article's "Sleep" section, as you did with the heading "Villas, private holiday house".
 * Consensus must be achieved on the article's talk page that rental listings should be allowed. When trying to build consensus provide some evidence that rental properties are commonly used by travelers to the destination and that their addition will improve the article. Please do not argue the merits of any particular company, but instead focus on the value of such accommodation for travelers to the destination city/region.
 * Agency listings must include a local address with a phone number that specifies the physical address at the destination for picking up the keys, managing the property and/or resolving rental issues. This address must also be prominently displayed on the agency web site.
 * Villas, apartments or cabins must be available for rentals of one week or less.

You are going to need to give some local contact details and make a case that rental villas are a common feature of Lovina.

That is why the listings have been moved across here. I have also applied some minor adjustments to the style and formatting. As both listings are appearing to be from a single supplier you may need to merge them into a single listing, unless they have entirely separate operations and 'reception/manager contact details. Cheers--(WT-en) felix 06:12, 29 October 2011 (EDT)

 * From the newly established sub-section:

 * Holiday house only 10 min from Lovina. Balinese theme with western style facilities. Big swimming pool.

 * A tropical holiday house surrounded by rice fields and sea only 10 min from Lovina. Balinese theme with western style facilities. Big swimming pool. A perfect place for relaxing and be pampered by the staff.

 * Moving other Villa listings that were in the hotel listings across as well here whilst this matter is resolved as per the notes above. This one is from within the Splurge section''':

 * < sleep name="Villa Santhi" alt="" address="Tukad Mungga" phone="+62 813 37175371" email="discoverbali@villasanthi.com" url="http://www.villasanthi.com" checkin="" checkout="" price="Around €300/night" lat="-8.137277" long="115.052014">Fully-serviced private villa set on the beach with a large infinity-effect swimming pool. (This villa is apparently now closed/sold. "Dear Guests...we decided it was best to sell our villa"...it may of course reopen with new owners. )

 * I am really not sure why these listings have been moved out of the article? Which part of Project:Accommodation_listings has been contravened? These are established villas for rent for periods of less than a week. They are not rental agency listings. --(WT-en) burmesedays 00:06, 30 October 2011 (EDT)

 * When I first saw them there I noted that the 2 new contributions attributed the two seperate villas to a single operator. That operator appears to be In the Netherlands, long way to go to pick up the keys. I am therefore assuming they have a local representation, even if it is only the housekeepers or a Jaga. Maybe the 2 villas have an entirley seperate operation and 'reception' facility. In which case maybe it is OK to list them seperately. However I note the only local contact is the one Indonesian Telkomsel number that is common to both listings. Also they have no information provided for "physical address at the destination for picking up the keys, managing the property and/or resolving rental issues". The 3rd listing, originally in the Splurge section also has no address, but does have a local Telkomsel number provided in the listing. (Telkomsel is an Indonesian mobile telephony provider).

 * Bali is popular for Villa rentals and I see no reason why Lovina should not have a section in the article. I only moved the third listing onto the discussion page as it was buried in the Splurge listing and yet is described as a villa. It did seem right to take ot the 2 new ones yet leave the existing one in when it has the same issues.

 * Unless there is a good reason these 3 2 listings should not go into the article then my feeling is that they should be listed. I am unaware of any existing consensus to have a villa/renatals listing here so it seems that a consensus needs should establish a consensus to do that.
 * There does not seem to be anyone objecting to the establishment of such a section. I do not and and apparently (WT-en) burmesedays does not appear to object either. Without consensus estabished any of these three listings may be deleted. So lets establish it.

 * I support the establishment of Sleep sub-section titled "Villas, private holiday house" on the basis that such accommodation offerings re a well established feature in many parts of the island of Bali, however I think a local address is required or an explanation given of why one is not supplied. (WT-en) felix 01:37, 30 October 2011 (EDT)

Understand section
Hi (WT-en) Aansentanu. I have moved your recent contribution to the discussion page as it needs some more work done on it before it can go into the article. We do not provide links to Wikipedia articles within the article text, rather we just provide one main link to the Wikipedia Lovina article. Perhaps you might like to have an other look over your contribution and see if it can be improved a little more before it goes back into the article. Also please note that we are not using US english in this article, or any of the other Indonesian Wikivoyage articles. Thanks. -- (WT-en) felix 13:48, 24 January 2012 (EST)

edit content from (WT-en) Aansentanu on 25 Jan 2011....

Lovina is a relatively new name was created in 1953 by Anak Agung [Panji Tisna]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pandji_Tisna, once as king of Buleleng, who built a small inn called Lovina. The small [Lovina]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lovina_Beach, still in the site as Lovina Beach Hotel running under Panji Tisna’s cousin, Anak Agung Ngurah Sentanu. Although the Government has declared the tourist area with the name "Kalibukbuk Tourist Resort", but local businessmen prefer to use Lovina. So as much as six traditional villages or more, which all bear the name of Lovina, about ten kilometer stretch along the main road which hugs the north coast to the west of Singaraja: Pemaron, Tukadmungga, Anturan, Kalibukbuk. Kaliasem and Temukus. Kalibukuk is the main hub of this area and is often thought of "Lovina town center".

title: Talk:Lovina


text:
Talk:Loving

Redirect
According to WikiPedia:Loving, New Mexico there is a tiny town by this name that is a suburb of Carlsbad, so I've redirected. The previous article was a love note in French, which isn't really a valid article topic. -- (WT-en) Ryan 20:34, 14 October 2006 (EDT)
 * Looks right to me; it's very unlikely that this will ever be an article. (I'm passing by there on Friday and will check to see if we're missing something.) -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 21:58, 14 October 2006 (EDT)

title: Talk:Loving


text:
Talk:Lowcountry

Merge
This is just an alternate spelling of Low Country and it covers the same area. I'm not sure which selling is preferred but there's no reason to have both articles. (WT-en) Eco84 11:53, 3 December 2010 (EST)

title: Talk:Lowcountry


text:
Talk:Lower Austria

Source
See for sightseeing information on Lower Austria that is partly worth being included into the article.

Lower Austria regions
Three out of the four region articles do not exist and the fourth is a barely there outline. What to do? Hobbitschuster (talk) 22:31, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

 * Create the three missing articles, and expand the other? WhatamIdoing (talk) 23:05, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
 * All of the cities that have articles listed in Mostviertel are also listed in Lower Austria, so no content would be lost by eliminating the sub-regions. But if someone has the time and knowledge to expand the subsections, that would be a better result. Ground Zero (talk) 01:08, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Regions
Three out of four of them redlink. This is not ideal. Hobbitschuster (talk) 11:15, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Unless someone wants to create articles, I think they should be merged and redirected to Lower Austria. Ground Zero (talk) 22:14, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Done. Ground Zero (talk) 12:06, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Markers
Can we please get rid of the ugly gray markers on the map? Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:42, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

title: Talk:Lower Austria


text:
Talk:Lower Mainland

Area covered by "Greater Vancouver" article
See Talk:Greater Vancouver for a discussion on this topic. Please make your comments there, not here. (WT-en) JimDeLaHunt 03:37, 19 September 2007 (EDT)

There was a Vancouver Coast and Mountains aricle. Text has been moved here and that turned into a redriect. See Talk:Vancouver, Coast & Mountains for the discussion. (WT-en) Pashley 03:58, 27 April 2008 (EDT)

Proposed new sub-regions for Lower Mainland
I'd like to propose a slightly different set of sub-regions for the Lower Mainland region article. I'm interested in gathering feedback for a while before I go head. Please give your comments below.

The proposed change has 5 parts:
 * 1) Make Vancouver, the article about the city of Vancouver proper, a top-level entry in the Lower Mainland hierarchy.
 * 2) Move the contents of the Metro Vancouver article to Lower Mainland or other articles as appropriate (there's not much there), and make Metro Vancouver and Greater Vancouver be redirects to Lower Mainland.
 * 3) Move Vancouver/North Shore to North Shore (British Columbia), making it a top-level entry in the Lower Mainland hierarchy.  Include Anmore and Belcarra here.
 * 4) Modification: don't put Anmore and Belcarra here. (WT-en) JimDeLaHunt 18:09, 27 July 2008 (EDT)
 * 5) Create a new region article Vancouver suburbs under Lower Mainland, and have it contain Surrey (British Columbia), Burnaby, Coquitlam, and all other destination articles in the close south and east vicinity of Vancouver, but not in the Fraser Valley region.
 * 6) Modification: make two new region aricles: Vancouver eastern suburbs and Vancouver southern suburbs. Eastern has Burnaby, Coquitlam, Port Moody, etc. north of Fraser river, and includes Anmore and Belcarra. Southern has Surrey (British Columbia), Richmond (British Columbia), White Rock, etc. (WT-en) JimDeLaHunt 18:09, 27 July 2008 (EDT)
 * 7) Keep the current Sea to Sky, Fraser Valley, and Sunshine Coast regions under Lower Mainland.

After this change, Lower Mainland will have a comfortable six sub-regions. The confusing entity "Greater Vancouver" will disappear from the geographic hierarchy. Vancouver, which is a two-level Huge City destination and the most important destination article in the Lower Mainland, will be higher up in the hierarchy. It will also shed it's bizarre dual identity as a region article. The North Shore will be treated as the region it is, instead of a district of the Vancouver destination. (WT-en) JimDeLaHunt 01:31, 24 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Modification: now seven sub-regions, not six. Still comfortable. (WT-en) JimDeLaHunt 18:09, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

The motivation for the change is that the Greater Vancouver article has taken on a greater scope than I think it merits, in order to fit it to the political entity named "Metro Vancouver"; and it is less useful to travellers as a result. It overlaps other region articles (see Talk:Metro Vancouver). Discussion there led me to the conclusion that it's better to get rid of the Metro Vancouver concept entirely, and replace it by traveller-focssed regions. (WT-en) JimDeLaHunt 01:31, 24 July 2008 (EDT)

Comments?

 * I agree with making Vancouver a top-level entry in the Lower Mainland. Still thinking about the North Shore and Vancouver suburb aspects. I'll be away this weekend so I'll post some comments next week when I'm back. One really quick thing -- Anmore and Belcarra aren't accessible from the North Shore (they can only be reached thru Port Moody), so I think they should reside in the same region as Port Moody rather than the North Shore. Actually, I think they should be amalgamated into a Port Moody article (or even a Tri-Cities article), but that's another discussion! (WT-en) Shaund 17:57, 25 July 2008 (EDT)

 * Actually, after rereading it and the modifications, the proposed structure pretty much matches what I had been thinking about. I'm just not sure what to do with Bowen Island. The most logical place would be to put it under the North Shore, however the North Shore article is currently a city article so it would look odd sticking one city article under another. Some things I've thought of are:

 * 1) Treat the North Shore as a region with separate city articles for North Van, West Van and Bowen Island.
 * 2) Leave it on its own as another subregion within Lower Mainland.
 * 3) Move it to another region within the Lower Mainland, such as Sunshine Coast or Sea to Sky.
 * 4) Put it under a North Shore city article anyway.

 * The first option is probably more consistent with the typical Wikivoyage hierarchy, but I think it's not as useful to the user. North and West Van are pretty much the same city so I think the current combined article makes it easier for the visitor than having to go through two smaller articles. I don't really like the last option either because I think it would be awkward to include in a city article. Out of 2 and 3, I'd probably lean towards 2 -- we only have seven subregions, so another one shouldn't be a problem. (WT-en) Shaund 02:03, 31 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Shaund, I like #3, move it to Sunshine Coast or Sea to Sky. From a traveller's point of view Bowen is very different from the North Shore, because it's wild rather than paved, and it takes a bit of effort to get to. Like the Sunshine Coast, it takes a ferry ride to get to. Like the Sea to Sky, it's just beyond Horseshoe Point and most people drive right by it without thinking about it.  I lean towards putting it in Sea to Sky.  (WT-en) JimDeLaHunt 02:10, 1 August 2008 (EDT)
 * Sea to Sky seems reasonable to me. We'll see how it goes. (WT-en) Shaund 00:47, 2 August 2008 (EDT)
 * One other thought I had was should we consider amalgamating some of the city articles together where the various suburbs are indistinguishable? For instance, Belcarra and Anmore could easily be folded in to Port Moody. Same thing for Coquitlam and Port Coquitlam. We could merge all five into a Tri-Cities article since it is a recognized name in the region. Surrey and White Rock are also good candidates. I know the standard policy is each city has its own article, but for a traveller in a metro region like Vancouver, do they really care about Coquitlam versus Port Coquitlam? One weird thing I noticed was White Rock and Crescent Beach. I always thought Crescent Beach is in White Rock, but technically it's in Surrey.  Because of that, even though it's pretty close to the main boardwalk and that in White Rock, it would end up in a separate article. Just a thought anyway. (WT-en) Shaund 02:03, 31 July 2008 (EDT)
 * One way to resolve merger dilemmas is to merge, but create redirects from the individual municipality names to the actual destination articles. Thus North Vancouver and West Vancouver exist as redirects to Vancouver/North Shore. I must also say that I lean towards dividing destination articles, as long as both parts of the destination have something that could be added to the See, Do, Eat, Drink, and Sleep sections. (WT-en) JimDeLaHunt 02:10, 1 August 2008 (EDT)
 * Note - I added a map above with the existing Greater Vancouver articles and colour-coded by the new region. (WT-en) Shaund 10:42, 31 July 2008 (EDT)
 * (WT-en) Shaund, nice work with the map and with your thoughtful comments. (WT-en) JimDeLaHunt 02:10, 1 August 2008 (EDT)

I'm hearing consensus to go ahead. Any objections? (WT-en) JimDeLaHunt 02:10, 1 August 2008 (EDT)
 * One last thought since we're looking at the Lower Mainland -- should the Fraser Valley be split into two regions given that there's probably 11-12 articles that could fall under it? The more suburban Pitt Meadows, Maple Ridge, Langley and Fort Langley would be Fraser Valley West and Abbotsford, Chilliwack, Hope and others would be Fraser Valley East. (WT-en) Shaund 14:38, 3 August 2008 (EDT)
 * Interesting point. This leads me to re-think some other boundaries. How about replacing three regions by four, for a total of 8 sub-regions under Lower Mainland? (WT-en) JimDeLaHunt 19:28, 3 August 2008 (EDT)
 * Vancouver suburbs region, to include Burnaby, New Westminster, Delta, Ladner, etc. Just the inner ring, most tightly connected to Vancouver by Hwy-99 and Skytrain.
 * PoCoMo or Tri-Cities (British Columbia) (see Wikipedia's Tri-Cities) to contain Coquitlam, Port Coquitlam, Port Moody, Anmore and Belcarra. This applies (WT-en) Shaund's idea at a region level, rather than as a destination.
 * Suburban Fraser Valley to contain the suburban valley destinations: Surrey, Pitt Meadows, Maple Ridge, Langley and Fort Langley. Alternate name: Lower Fraser Valley.
 * Fraser Valley now contains the destinations east of Langley and Maple Ridge: Mission (British Columbia), Hope, etc.
 * Or another idea: How about assigning Pitt Meadows and Maple Ridge to the new Vancouver eastern suburbs? And maybe Langley and Fort Langley to the new Vancouver eastern suburbs? This drains a few destinations from the Fraser Valley region, to take the pressure off dividing it. (WT-en) JimDeLaHunt 19:28, 3 August 2008 (EDT)
 * The first suggestion is interesting but I think people might find it confusing that Delta is a Vancouver suburbs region while Coquitlam and Surrey are not. The second one is easy to implement, but I think I still prefer to see Pitt Meadows and company with the other Fraser Valley destinations (they don't quite have the same suburb character yet). I guess ultimately this is something we could probably slice up many different ways and never be perfect. I don't think 11-12 articles in the Fraser Valley is too bad, maybe we should just go with the original plan. (WT-en) Shaund 02:36, 4 August 2008 (EDT)

Recap of proposal, Aug 3
Here's a recap of the proposed new Region breakup for Lower Mainland. It's worded as a draft for Lower Mainland. Please make comments below, and edits to the draft immediately below. (WT-en) JimDeLaHunt 03:39, 4 August 2008 (EDT)

 * Vancouver, a beautiful, vibrant city with diverse neighbourhoods, a very multi-cultural and cosmopolitan city — and the political core of the Lower Mainland and economic core of the province.

 * Vancouver eastern suburbs, a series of towns north of the Fraser River and east of the Pitt River, all fairly urban and defined by their relationship to Vancouver. This region includes Burnaby and New Westminster; the Tri-Cities of Coquitlam, Port Coquitlam, Port Moody ("PoCoMo"); and Anmore and Belcarra villages.
 * Vancouver southern suburbs, the area between the Fraser River and the US border, where much of the Lower Mainland's population growth and suburban sprawl takes place. It includes the towns of Surrey, Richmond, Delta, and White Rock.

 * The North Shore of the Burrard Inlet is where dense urban meets dramatic tall mountains. Formally the separate municipalities of North Vancouver and West Vancouver, they are in practice one destination. The mountains provide attractions like Grouse Mountain ski resort. At the west of the North Shore is Horseshoe Bay, ferry terminal to the Sunshine Coast.

 * The Fraser Valley has lush fertile farmland, which contributes a large portion of the local produce. The Fraser is also the world's greatest salmon producing river, and a focus for the region's economy, transportation and culture. The towns of Pitt Meadows, Maple Ridge, and Langley are transforming from agricultural to suburb. Abbotsford, Mission, Chilliwack, and Hope remain closer to their agricultural roots, but are also transforming.

 * The Sea to Sky region stretches from Lions Bay (just north of Horseshoe Bay), up the east side of Howe Sound past getaway destination Bowen Island to Squamish, the gateway to BC's magnificent alpine country of forests, lakes, and year round world class outdoor activities. The Sea-to-Sky Highway (Highway 99) clings to the mountainsides, letting you drive from Vancouver to Whistler, one of North America's top ski resorts, in two hours.  Further in is Pemberton. The area is rich with archaeological sites and historical lore of the Salish Indians.

 * The Sunshine Coast, named for its 2,400 hours of annual sunshine, is north-west of Vancouver, a 40 minute ferry ride from Horseshoe Bay. It is a 180 km (110mi) stretch of rainforest, seashore and mountains. This is the secret destination of many individuals, where the island life is found on the mainland. Here is a slower pace of life, where those who appreciate the beauty of outstanding marine parks and marshland bird sanctuaries, old growth forest and alpine peaks will find this the perfect destination.

Any last comments? (WT-en) JimDeLaHunt 03:39, 4 August 2008 (EDT)

 * Looks good. I just fixed a few links and tweaked the wording a little bit. (WT-en) Shaund 14:25, 4 August 2008 (EDT)
 * OK, I'm implementing. See next section. (WT-en) JimDeLaHunt 01:54, 12 August 2008 (EDT)

Implemention plan and status
There are a number of steps required to implement this Lower Mainland redistricting. This is a list of the steps. Feel free to bite off a few of these and do them. Then make a note at the end of the bullet point that you've done it. (WT-en) JimDeLaHunt 01:54, 12 August 2008 (EDT)

 * Lower Mainland: replace with "recap" text above. Done (WT-en) JimDeLaHunt 01:54, 12 August 2008 (EDT)

 * Vancouver: Change IsIn to Lower Mainland. Otherwise unchanged.
 * Done (WT-en) Shaund 00:29, 13 August 2008 (EDT)

 * Vancouver eastern suburbs: create new region article. IsIn Lower Mainland. Use Lower Mainland as a starting point for region's description. Make sure these cities are listed: Burnaby and New Westminster; the Tri-Cities of Coquitlam, Port Coquitlam, Port Moody ("PoCoMo"); and Anmore and Belcarra villages. Done (WT-en) JimDeLaHunt 02:10, 12 August 2008 (EDT)
 * Vancouver eastern suburbs: For each city in region, set IsIn to Vancouver eastern suburbs.
 * Done (WT-en) Shaund 01:16, 13 August 2008 (EDT)

 * Tri-Cities (British Columbia): redirect to Vancouver eastern suburbs. Done (WT-en) JimDeLaHunt 02:53, 13 August 2008 (EDT)
 * PoCoMo: redirect to Vancouver eastern suburbs. Done (WT-en) JimDeLaHunt 02:53, 13 August 2008 (EDT)

 * Vancouver southern suburbs: create new region article. IsIn Lower Mainland. Use Lower Mainland as a starting point for region's description. Make sure these cities are listed: Surrey, Richmond, Delta, and White Rock. Done (WT-en) JimDeLaHunt 02:10, 12 August 2008 (EDT)
 * Vancouver southern suburbs: For each city in region, set IsIn to Vancouver southern suburbs.
 * Done (WT-en) Shaund 00:27, 13 August 2008 (EDT)

 * Move Vancouver/North Shore to North Shore (British Columbia). IsIn Lower Mainland. Merge Lower Mainland into description. Done (WT-en) JimDeLaHunt 02:22, 12 August 2008 (EDT)

 * Change all links pointing to Vancouver/North Shore to point to North Shore (British Columbia) instead.
 * Done (except Talk pages and my user page -- I'll update it later) (WT-en) Shaund 00:27, 13 August 2008 (EDT)

 * Fraser Valley: Modify region article. Change IsIn to Lower Mainland. Merge Lower Mainland into region's description. Make sure these cities are listed: Pitt Meadows, Maple Ridge, and Langley, Abbotsford, Mission, Chilliwack, and Hope Done (WT-en) JimDeLaHunt 03:07, 13 August 2008 (EDT)
 * Fraser Valley: For each city in region, set IsIn to Fraser Valley. Done (WT-en) JimDeLaHunt 03:07, 13 August 2008 (EDT)

 * Sea to Sky: Modify region article. Change IsIn to Lower Mainland. Merge Lower Mainland into region's description. Make sure these cities are listed: Bowen Island, Squamish, Whistler, Pemberton.
 * Done (WT-en) Shaund 00:14, 18 August 2008 (EDT)

 * Sea to Sky: For each city in region, set IsIn to Sea to Sky. Done (WT-en) Shaund 00:14, 18 August 2008 (EDT)

 * Review Bowen Island, set IsIn to Sea to Sky. Done (WT-en) Shaund 00:14, 18 August 2008 (EDT)

 * Sunshine Coast (British Columbia): Modify region article. Change IsIn to Lower Mainland. Merge Lower Mainland into region's description. Make sure cities are listed.
 * Done (WT-en) Shaund 00:17, 20 August 2008 (EDT)

 * Sunshine Coast (British Columbia): For each city in region, set IsIn to Sunshine Coast (British Columbia).
 * Done (WT-en) Shaund 00:17, 20 August 2008 (EDT)

 * Metro Vancouver / Greater Vancouver: Move any destinations out to appropriate region article. Be sure that every city mentioned there is mentioned in the appropriate region article. Change page to #REDIRECT Lower Mainland.
 * Done (WT-en) Shaund 01:14, 20 August 2008 (EDT)

 * Change all links pointing to Metro Vancouver or Greater Vancouver to point to Lower Mainland instead.
 * Done, except for Talk pages and Vancouver (disambiguation). I'm not sure what to do with the reference to Metro Vancouver on the disambiguation page -- should we let it be or delete it since anyone who enters the page will be automatically redirected to the Lower Mainland page? (WT-en) Shaund 01:14, 20 August 2008 (EDT)
 * I polished Vancouver (disambiguation) a bit. I took out links to Greater Vancouver, but put in a link to Lower Mainland. (WT-en) JimDeLaHunt 03:26, 20 August 2008 (EDT)

Bravo! to (WT-en) Shaund for doing so much work to complete the project! Thank you! (WT-en) JimDeLaHunt 03:26, 20 August 2008 (EDT)

Lower Mainland map
Wow, (WT-en) Shaund, you never cease to amaze! Great work producing a map. And that template that wraps it — I had no idea it existed! Still, I think the map could benefit from some tweaks. The map looks to be the right size in the article, or maybe a tad small, but the text is hard to read. I think it could stand to be 2-3x as big. This means the region names will fill and perhaps overflow the region boundaries. Perhaps we need a call-out for the Vancouver & Suburbs regions, since they are so much smaller than the outlying regions. Could you upload or point to the source file, please? Image:Lower_Mainland.svg doesn't appear to exist. Maybe I could take a crack at it. Great work! Thank you! (WT-en) JimDeLaHunt 01:44, 25 August 2008 (EDT)

 * Thanks. The SVG file is in Wikivoyage Shared (Category: British Columbia). To get to a link that works, open the image file and click on the file description page link. This brings up a nearly identical page that has a working link. Not sure why the link on the first page doesn't work, I think it defaults to wikivoyage/en rather than WT Shared. (WT-en) Shaund 01:42, 26 August 2008 (EDT)
 * Ah, got it. It was a capitalisation problem: Image:Lower_Mainland.svg doesn't work, Image:Lower_mainland.svg (lowercase 'm') does. Location on Shared: isn't a factor, because each language version of Wikivoyage looks on Shared as well as on the local wiki. (WT-en) JimDeLaHunt 03:37, 26 August 2008 (EDT)

 * Cool. I'll let you work on the Lower Mainland map and I'll finish the (high level) street map for Vancouver that I've been working on. (WT-en) Shaund 10:33, 26 August 2008 (EDT)

Excessive detail
There is way too much detail in the Get in section, which makes up most of the article. Per Region article template,
 * "This is where you would note the best arrival points to start exploring this region from. For example, it would be worth listing Phoenix and Albuquerque as good starting points for the American Southwest. You can also give driving directions from large nearby cities that readers might be coming from. Save the nitty-gritty details of how to get to the main entry points for a region for their city pages, though."

I plan to start pruning this down to bring it in line with policy by moving detail to city level articles if appropriate. Any concerns? Ground Zero (talk) 17:11, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I say prune away. A lot of the Get in section is just replicated from Vancouver from the looks of it and isn't needed here. -Shaundd (talk) 21:25, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

please read this discussion. It is a bad idea to duplicate information that appears in other articles. It is more difficult to keep this info up to date. It is better to keep the up-to-dare info in the Vancouver article, and refer readers to that article from here. Ground Zero (talk) 03:59, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I reverted Pab's last bunch of edits to this article and Vancouver, and s/he reverted me, so I reverted again. If s/he reverts again, that'll require a short block, I'm afraid, as I've also posted an explanation to their user talk page. Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:08, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
 * You are making some great contributions to Wikivoyage, and we appreciate your participation. On this article, you've added a whole lot of stuff that duplicates what is in other articles, or doesn't belong (like directions to Vancouver, which belong in the Vancouver article). So I've taken a lot of it out. Edit-warring (i.e., reverting others' edits without discussion) is a frustrating waste of time. That's why people who do it end up being blocked from editing. Neither Ikan Kekek nor I want you block you from editing, but if you ignore us and continue reverting, we will have to do that.
 * A better way is for us to discuss on the talk page how the article should look before making further changes. You will find that most editors here are interested in resolving disagreements amicably, and are will to compromise. Please work with us. Ground Zero (talk) 13:35, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
 * And I feel like the "Get in" section is still way too long and detailed. All of this should be summarized, with specifics put in articles for individual cities. Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:42, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Undated warningbox
Is it still needed, or hasd the floods settled? -- SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 11:05, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

title: Talk:Lower Mainland


text:
Talk:Lower Peninsula

I created this article not to make it part of the Michigan IsIn hierarchy, but as a placeholder/disambiguator of sorts, since it's tempting to link here when talking in contrast to Upper Peninsula. - (WT-en) Todd VerBeek 11:30, 11 April 2006 (EDT)

title: Talk:Lower Peninsula


text:
Talk:Lower Saxony

 * see also: Talk:Lower Saxony/Archive

regions
Currently Middle Weser has only 2 articles and I really cannot see it growing much more any time soon. Question is what should it be merged with? Although Weser Uplands only has 6 articles and Elbe-Weser Triangle only has 3 and would make sense to bring all to do with the Elbe together, I actually think Western Plains (Lower Saxony) with 4 articles makes the most sense from a point of view of type of landscape and style of town in the area. Comments and input please. --Traveler100 (talk) 12:00, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Suggestion:merge Middle Weser into Western Plains (Lower Saxony); combine East Frisia and Elbe-Weser Triangle into new article Coastal Lower Saxony. --Traveler100 (talk) 08:45, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * The Hannover and Brunswick region are not very large by area either and at least the former contains a lot of redlinks... The problem with Harz is that it is one continuous region in many regards but has been in two separate countries for forty years, thus necessitating something like two Harz articles.... Or another one for the whole Harz as an extraregion... Hobbitschuster (talk) 13:33, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Any progress on this?
So this seems to have stalled before any result was actually achieved. How should we proceed? Hobbitschuster (talk) 22:42, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I would propose to merge Weser Uplands and the Lower Saxon parts of Harz into Southern Lower Saxony (compare de:Südniedersachsen). You have common characteristics in landscape (rolling hills and low mountain ranges), sights (e.g. romantic, well-preserved medieval town cores) and infrastructure (both regions belong to the Verkehrsverbund Süd-Niedersachsen transport network, Göttingen is their main transportation hub). Moreover I would merge Middle Weser and Hanover Region. Middle Weser is infrastructure-wise strongly oriented towards Hanover, e.g. Hanover S-Bahnen (suburban trains) running to Nienburg and Minden, moreover Middle Weser belonged to the administrative region of Hanover (until administrative regions were suppressed in 2004) and the "Leine-Weser area" still has a joint commissioner for regional development. While merging East Frisia and Elbe-Weser Triangle may have some merits (e.g. typical activities linked to their seaside location), the region would be huge, stretching about 200 km from its western to its eastern end, and therefore pretty unhandy. E.g. arriving via Hamburg is advisable if you go to the Elbe-Weser Triangle, but it does not make sense if you travel to East Frisia. --RJFF (talk) 10:41, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I have been rethinking this. It might be even better to split the current Middle Weser region and merge its Western part—Diepholz district (see administrative map), which is, by the way, not located on the Weser anyway—which is closer to Oldenburg and Osnabrück with the Western Plains, where it fits pretty naturally, and the Eastern part—Nienburg and Verden districts—with the Hanover Region, as it is closer and more strongly linked to Hanover. Moreover, I uphold my proposal to merge Weser Uplands and Upper Harz into Southern Lower Saxony. Agreed? May we ask  to please update the map accordingly? (I have seen that you have uploaded and edited quite a few Wikivoyage district maps, and I do not know how to edit them. The original uploader  has unfortunately not been very active lately.) A reorganisation of regions should not be done without the respective edit to the map, to avoid confusion of readers. --RJFF (talk) 16:31, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm not familiar with the fine details of the places, despite having traveled around northern Germany including Niedersachsen quite a few times but I do agree that there's no use in having a lot of near-empty articles. Though, I can certainly help out with the map when all changes are agreed upon. ϒpsilon (talk) 17:05, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
 * That would be great! Thank you. --RJFF (talk) 11:11, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I think the reorganization sounds good, but what about Harz? For quite some time, it was listed as a sub-region of two states of Germany. How do we address this? Or has this already been addressed? Hobbitschuster (talk) 17:30, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Leave Harz as it, it works as it should as an ExtraRegion. --Traveler100 (talk) 17:41, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
 * So, do you agree with my proposals on Middle Weser and Southern Lower Saxony? --RJFF (talk) 11:11, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
 * yes I think moving the contents of Middle Weser into other existing regions is a good idea. --Traveler100 (talk) 11:17, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Could you please delete Southern Lower Saxony (which has a short contributions history) to make way for the move of Weser Uplands? I have performed the mergers. If you like, you could update the map now. Thanks in advance to both of you. --RJFF (talk) 18:09, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Done --Traveler100 (talk) 18:15, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Dunno if I have time for it tonight, but ping again if it's not done in a couple of days :) . Just to make sure I understood correctly, there are two changes to be done: Middle Weser > Hanover Region and Harz + Weser Uplands > Southern Lower Saxony ϒpsilon (talk) 18:34, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is not too difficult, Middle Weser should be split: Diepholz district > Western Plains and Nienburg + Verden districts > Hanover Region (you may use this map for orientation). If it is too bothersome, it would be no problem to merge all of Middle Weser into Hanover Region, as Diepholz district currently has no place of interest anyway. Kind regards, --RJFF (talk) 19:59, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

[indent reset] New map is up. ϒpsilon (talk) 13:55, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Where? The map in the article is still the old one. Hobbitschuster (talk) 15:27, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
 * It's a new version of the file in commons. You may have to reset your browser/force reload the page or something. ϒpsilon (talk) 15:47, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot! The regions look exactly as I imagined them. But some of the road and rail lines now extend beyond the frame of the map, which was not the case before your edit. Perhaps you could have a look again and fix this? Kind regards, --RJFF (talk) 09:44, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I got aware of the problem when the PNG was uploaded, but didn't yesterday have the energy to take the SVG into pieces once again to investigate the issue. As you can see now, I added a frame and now there's nothing overflowing. ϒpsilon (talk) 13:08, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Perfect. --RJFF (talk) 13:31, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:Lower Saxony


text:
Talk:Luanda

for who like to surf, kitesurf or do radical sports, try check out the ilha de luanda or cabo-ledo beach, in 2 houres from luanda.

for who like brazilian jiu-jitsu and MMA check the web-site www.graciebarra-angola.com there you can found very triendly and good train with roger gracie student, Helio Pereira and Sergio Vieira Lopes

Alternative banner for this article?
I created a new alternative banner for this article (I initially created it first and foremost so that it would be used at the top of the parallel article in the Hebrew edition of Wikivoyage, yet I later decided to also suggest that the English Wikivoyage community would consider using it here as well). So, which banner do you prefer having at the top of this article? ויקיג'אנקי (talk) 04:38, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

 * A nicer view for sure. There is a bit of blur in the picture, but then most noticeable where it will be obscured by the title anyway. PrinceGloria (talk) 15:20, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

 * I agree entirely. Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:05, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

 * Yes, it's an improvement. Danapit (talk) 18:00, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

 * Proposed Syced (talk) 07:55, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Slavery by any other name
From the article:

After slavery officially ended (resisted by the Portuguese but enforced by the British) forced labour began.

Correct me if I'm missing something, but forced labour is the definition of slavery, is it not? So I think we could simplify this as "Slavery continued for some time after it was supposed to have officially ended." Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:00, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

title: Talk:Luanda


text:
Talk:Luang Phrabang

Unusual edits
The series of edits going on in reference to this article seems kind of weird to me. Can somebody who knows something about Laos please check this situation out ? Thanks ! -- (WT-en) Mark 19:03, 11 Dec 2005 (EST)

 * Pages Luang Prabang and Luang Prapang redirect to each other and neither can be edited (looks like it's been stuck like that for about 9 months).

 * When that problem is resolved, the article should be Luang Prabang
 * Luang Prapang should redirect to Luang Prabang
 * Louang Prabang should redirect to Luang Prabang
 * Luang Phrabang should redirect to Luang Prabang

 * This needs to be fixed by (WT-en) Evan at the database level. In the meantime it is helpful to have an active link from the Project:Votes for deletion page so that we can verify whether or not the issue still exists. -- (WT-en) Ryan 20:01, 11 Dec 2005 (EST)

Links from other articles to Luang Prabang now back as they originally were. Although Luang Prabang now no longer looks like a redirect, "what links here" suggests otherwise and the problem remains.

Suggestion for when it's been fixed:
 * Delete Luang Prabang
 * Revert Luang Prapang to 11:33, 26 Feb 2004
 * Rename Luang Prapang to Luang Prabang
 * Create a new Luang Prapang and redirect it to Luang Prabang

title: Talk:Luang Phrabang


text:
Talk:Luang Prabang

accommodation listings
There are such a vast array of non-descript guesthouses that the accommodation listing has become quiet cumbersome Perhaps we should trim the list to only include some of the more notable providers, I'm not sure how much it helps anyone to list a business if you have nothing really to say about it. Do we want to write a guide, or an encyclopedia?

I would be reluctant to remove any listings without consensus here because people have clearly put a lot of effort into writing the listings, but maybe a trim down is in order If we just said "there are also a slew of similar non-decript guesthouses in the streets x,y,z surely this would do the job

183.182.101.61 13:02, 22 June 2017 (UTC)Willthewanderer

Why is the pronunciation given as "LOH proh-BAHNG"?!? Unless that's a local accent, surely "luang phabang" (where "ph" = aspirated "p" is more accurate)?

Anyone know of budget or low-mid-range hotels in Luang Prabang that have internet (wireless or wired) in the rooms?

In Vientiane, Inter Hotel has free wireless in the rooms, the cheapest of which cost $15/night.

Cheers.

Does anyone know what the target price for goods in the night market should be after bargaining?? This would be great information!

 * Ha! See Haggling. (WT-en) Jpatokal 14:00, 6 August 2007 (EDT)

ASEAN / Asian
ASEAN = The Association of Southeast Asian Nations. This is not a typo for "Asian". I accidentally hit the submit button before adding an edit reason with this change. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 10:22, 1 June 2010 (EDT)

Accommodation listings outside of Luang Prabang
So, everyone, do you think any accommodations outside of town should be listed in this guide? If so, how far out of town? Would 30 minutes' drive be OK? For the record, I think nothing at all outside of town should be listed, period. But let's reach a consensus. (WT-en) Ikan Kekek 05:17, 18 April 2011 (EDT)
 * I'm not as concerned with the fact it's 30 minutes out of town as with the fact that its pure advertising from a marketing company (check http://www.appletree-asia.com), and it doesn't state prices as well. For these reasons i'd wipe all their entrys.(WT-en) Swissbelg 21:22, 18 April 2011 (EDT)

Alms ceremony
The text (rightly) advises tourists to Luang Prabang not to get too close to the monks at the morning alms ceremony and to strongly consider watching only from a distance - yet the photo illustrating it (before I removed it) was a close-up, setting the wrong example. 58.9.35.209 09:59, 12 May 2011 (EDT)

''(The above comment is me, in an internet cafe in Chiang Mai, before I set up account)

See also. This image is of an official Laos Tourism poster observed at Luang Prabang International Airport in early May 2011. (WT-en) Ian8311 12:07, 12 May 2011 (EDT)

"Vietnam Bar"
The only references to this online appear to be either from <2006 or this article and I've never heard any reference to it on either of my visits in 2009 and 2011. The tuk tuks gathered around Utopia/Hive/Lao Lao Garden all go to the bowling alley. Am I right in assuming that it doesn't exist any more and can be removed in an update to the Drink section? (WT-en) Enigmatic 10:25, 25 May 2011 (EDT)
 * Don't know for sure if it still exists anymore or not, but this sounds like a good enough reason to eliminate it. It can always be added back in later if someone feels it necessary.(WT-en) texugo 10:38, 25 May 2011 (EDT)

Paragraph moved
I moved the last paragraph of the "history" section to the "understand" section because it does not relate to history at all. (WT-en) Rbakels 09:59, 28 January 2012 (EST)

Arthouse Cafe
http://www.tripadvisor.com/Restaurant_Review-g295415-d1654341-Reviews-Arthouse_Cafe-Luang_Prabang.html

Should Arthouse Cafe be added to the list of cafes? It is number 2 on tripadvisor. I haven't visited, so I'd leave it to someone else to actually give it a little review like the other cafes. 74.99.171.188 20:23, 20 April 2012 (EDT)

title: Talk:Luang Prabang


text:
Talk:Lubbock

I'm 99% sure that John Denver grew up in Roswell and Aspen, per WikiPedia:John Denver. --(WT-en) Evan 19:12, 12 Feb 2004 (EST)

Ha!
John Denver is a Texas Tech University graduate. He did not grow up in Lubbock. Most folks in Lubbock know that, but "others" don't. ;)

Actually he dropped out from tech.66.209.247.72 00:37, 17 September 2008 (EDT)

Great edits
So, I'm happy to see that there's so much work going on on this page. I've made some changes to move data out to other articles when appropriate. I've also changed some wiki links to plain text (see Project:What is an article? and I've un-bolded a lot of text for clarity (see Project:Use boldface to call out important topics).

I hope this growth spurt continues! --(WT-en) Evan 08:47, 1 Sep 2005 (EDT)

locals know best
I was not pleased with the original article and decided to add a few things. Lubbock is a interesting little town with plenty of secrets and lots of history which permeates everything... And, yes - There is plenty to do in this city. You have to look first of all.

 * That's great! This article is particularly weak on restaurants, hotels, and nightlife in Lubbock. I think there's also a lot of work that can be done on laying out a framework for the rest of the Panhandle. --(WT-en) Evan 13:50, 2 Sep 2005 (EDT)

...bit(s) more
Have less time than I had hoped to finish this little project. Uploaded a picture of 4th on Broadway, and will add more pictures of Lubbock. Especially Texas Tech and Lubbock Lake - soon! --(WT-en) Apotheosist 13:43, 14 Sep 2005 (EDT)

...bits more
helping roommate out - cleaning up some stuff - more info on education ... real important to us folks in lubbock - moved the cactus pic to top of page .. had to figure out how to format it though --- thanks

Rollback
I just rolled back a large number of contributions from one anonymous user-- they seemed snarky comments at best and, while there may have been some value to some of the edits, it didn't follow our Project:Manual of style suggested tone. (WT-en) Maj 17:13, 17 January 2007 (EST)

Updates June 2020
Oops, I made numerous updates without logging in. It seemed like it needed it though since links were boken, etc.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:52, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Cattle sculpture outside National Ranching Heritage Center IMG 0243.JPG

 * Merely a freedom of panorama issue, but there are no photos in this article at all, which is the real problem. Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:38, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I guess we have to then locally upload it. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 06:59, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Only if we want to put it in the article. Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:54, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Whirlwind controversy
Why is the Whirlwind series considered controversial? There is no mention of this on Wikipedia and a Google Search only returned one relevant article, but many of the other sculptures could be considered equally controversial (similar to much of any works of art anywhere):. Nicole Sharp (talk) 02:05, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:Lubbock


text:
Talk:Lubumbashi

Recommend the following additions to the Sleep Section:

Park Hotel (Hotel Leopold II), 50, Avenue Munongo (between main post office and train station). Built in 1929, this art deco gem is Lubumbashi's classic hotel. The inner courtyard has an excellent restaurant, with delightful live jazz most evenings. $100.

Hotel Belle-Vue, Av. Kasai (one block from train station). One of the most beautiful buildings in Lubumbashi. The rooms are simple and inexpensive. The balcony overlooking the busy street is charming. $50. (WT-en) DenyerSR 10:01, 8 July 2011 (EDT)DenyerSR

title: Talk:Lubumbashi


text:
Talk:Lucca

Accommodation listings
Should any outside of Lucca citta' be listed? If so, how far should the limit be? What do you think? I thought 18 km was definitely too far. Is 5 km too rigid a limit? 10, perhaps? Or should everything be within the city limits? That would be simplest. (WT-en) Ikan Kekek 05:20, 7 May 2012 (EDT)

 * I think we should allow listings located outside the city limits, especially for smaller cities in countryside. 5 - 10 km sounds reasonable (nice bike ride). (WT-en) Jjtk 06:58, 7 May 2012 (EDT)

title: Talk:Lucca


text:
Talk:Luckenbach

a collection of buildings? vfd it --(WT-en) Lone.guner 18:22, 29 January 2008 (EST)

Its own article
A collection of buildings is about right. Maybe 4 of them. There are no accommodations or eateries here, and local happenings are often spontaneous. I think a blurb in the Fredericksburg article would suffice. (WT-en) Texugo 08:33, 10 April 2008 (EDT)

 * I'm sorta on the fence about it... it is tiny, yes, but it also has a reputation.... hmmm – (WT-en) cacahuate  talk 19:28, 21 June 2008 (EDT)

title: Talk:Luckenbach


text:
Talk:Lucknow

Is Lucknow on the Delhi-Varanasi route? Is that the main line? Isn't the closest town on the mainline Sitapur--or Kanpur?—WP:iFaqeer

I: bet you know better than me... I just remember wanting to get off the Kathamandu-Varanasi bus 13 hours into the trip and reading or hearing that I coule get there from Lucknow... please update the train info with better info if you have it! Thanks! (WT-en) Majnoona 02:02, 6 Oct 2004 (EDT)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item is missing permission
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item is missing permission information and may be deleted: You can see the details at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:52, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Patna-planetarium.jpg

title: Talk:Lucknow


text:
Talk:Luna Pier

''This page is for discussing the corresponding article or guide. For more about using talk pages check out Project:Using talk pages.''

Does my effort look convincing?
Any comments on my understand section? – (WT-en) CurvyEthyl 21:50, 29 September 2010 (EDT)

title: Talk:Luna Pier


text:
Talk:Lundazi

Does anyone know if Masopela and Masopela 2 still exist? The people I know who lived in Lundazi during 2003-2005 have never heard of them.(WT-en) Trezatium 09:24, 18 March 2006 (EST)

Lundazi here I Come
I have just been moved to Lundazi under the Wildlife Conservation Society's COMACO (Community Markets for Conservation)Program. Does anyone out there know of some vacant accomodation? Please contact edchizu@gmail.com

title: Talk:Lundazi