text:
Wikivoyage:Votes for deletion/June 2012

Image:Thailand South map.png

 * Delete. Orphaned map, superseded by Image:Southern-thailand-regions.png. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:07, 18 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 15:15, 1 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:Gulf Of Thailand East map.png

 * Delete. Orphaned map, superseded by Image:Central plains map.png. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:07, 18 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 15:15, 1 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:Vt-flag.gif

 * Delete. Orphaned Vermont state flag.  State flag images typically aren't used in Wikivoyage articles, so this is unlikely to ever be de-orphaned. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:07, 18 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 15:15, 1 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:Yosemite Tunnel View in Novemer 2004.jpeg

 * Delete. Orphaned image of the same view as Image:Tunnel view, Yosemite.jpg, which is a better image.  Delete since this is unlikely to be de-orphaned. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:07, 18 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 15:15, 1 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:Club Sandwich With Fries.jpg

 * Delete. Orphaned picture of a club sandwich.  Delete since this is unlikely to be de-orphaned. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:07, 18 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 15:15, 1 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:TexasFlag.png

 * Delete. Orphaned Texas state flag.  State flag images typically aren't used in Wikivoyage articles, so this is unlikely to ever be de-orphaned. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:07, 18 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 15:15, 1 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:Fatmonkeys.jpg

 * Delete. Orphaned image of a non-notable bar.  Delete per Image policy. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:07, 18 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 15:15, 1 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:Manly ss.jpg

 * Delete. Orphaned image with a copyright notice on it and no indication that it can be re-licensed CC-SA. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:07, 18 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 15:15, 1 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:Bc region.png

 * Delete. Orphaned map, superseded by Image:BC regions 2010.png. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:07, 18 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 15:15, 1 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:Lotusrestaurantoutside.jpg and Image:Lotusrestaurantinside.jpg

 * Delete. Orphaned images of a non-notable restaurant.  Delete per Image policy. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:07, 18 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 15:15, 1 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:Eiffelnight.jpg

 * Delete. Orphaned nighttime image of the Eiffel Tower.  It's orphaned, of poor quality, and there are copyright concerns about nighttime images of the tower (wikipedia:Eiffel Tower), so probably safest to delete. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:07, 18 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 15:15, 1 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:Olive.JPG

 * Delete. Orphaned image of a non-notable restaurant.  Delete per Image policy. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:07, 18 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 15:15, 1 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:Stateflag.jpg

 * Delete. Orphaned Indiana state flag.  State flag images typically aren't used in Wikivoyage articles, so this is unlikely to ever be de-orphaned. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:07, 18 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 15:15, 1 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:Dam.jpg

 * Delete. Orphaned image.  It indicates a site that it was taken from, but there is no indication that the image is licensed CC-SA on that site. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:07, 18 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 15:15, 1 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:Bethany.jpg

 * Delete. Orphaned image of a recognizable individual with no model release provided.  See Image policy. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:41, 18 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 15:15, 1 June 2012 (EDT)

São Jorge (Azores)

 * No content (WT-en) –sumone10154 20:03, 30 April 2012 (EDT)
 * Delete. This appears to be a mis-placed attempt at an image page. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:52, 1 May 2012 (EDT)
 * Redirect to São Jorge --(WT-en) Inas 23:43, 1 May 2012 (EDT)
 * That redirect does not work; it goes to a town in Brazil. We may need a disambiguation page.
 * Certainly this needs the image removed, but Sao Jorge (Azores) seems to be a real place and, so unless someone wants to fil out the article soon, it needs a redirect to Azores for now. (WT-en) Pashley 22:05, 20 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Redirected to Azores. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 16:09, 2 June 2012 (EDT)

Pottipadu

 * No content (WT-en) –sumone10154 20:03, 30 April 2012 (EDT)
 * Keep No content is not a reason for deletion. This seems to be a valid destination.  --(WT-en) Inas 23:40, 1 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Kept. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 16:09, 2 June 2012 (EDT)

Bolsward

 * No content (WT-en) –sumone10154 20:03, 30 April 2012 (EDT)
 * This is a stub and appears to be an actual place. Why do you say "no content"?  (Also, no VfD tag was placed on this article).  (WT-en) LtPowers 09:06, 1 May 2012 (EDT)
 * Keep No content is not a reason for deletion. This seems to be a valid destination.  --(WT-en) Inas 23:40, 1 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Kept. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 16:09, 2 June 2012 (EDT)

Guduvancheri

 * Basically no content (WT-en) –sumone10154 20:03, 30 April 2012 (EDT)
 * Keep No content is not a reason for deletion. This seems to be a valid destination.  --(WT-en) Inas 23:40, 1 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Kept. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 16:09, 2 June 2012 (EDT)

Kalaiya

 * No content (WT-en) –sumone10154 20:03, 30 April 2012 (EDT)

Result: Kept. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 16:14, 2 June 2012 (EDT)

Ashanboni

 * No content (WT-en) –sumone10154 20:03, 30 April 2012 (EDT)

Result: Kept. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 16:14, 2 June 2012 (EDT)

Berbera

 * No content (WT-en) –sumone10154 20:03, 30 April 2012 (EDT)
 * Keep - I've boosted the article significantly in an effort to save it from deletion. Please take another look, as it's much better now. (WT-en)  J ames A    >talk 02:46, 18 May 2012 (EDT)

 * Keep this and all the others proposed with "No content" as a reason for deletion. That is not a reason for deletion according to Project:Deletion policy.
 * Many of the others should be redirected, but this one is a simple keep. —The preceding comment was added by (WT-en) Pashley (talk • contribs)

Result: Kept. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 16:14, 2 June 2012 (EDT)

Isa Town

 * No content (WT-en) –sumone10154 20:03, 30 April 2012 (EDT)

Result: Kept. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 16:14, 2 June 2012 (EDT)

Sokaraja

 * No content (WT-en) –sumone10154 20:03, 30 April 2012 (EDT)

Result: Kept. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 16:14, 2 June 2012 (EDT)

The Landings

 * Delete. An article for a gated community in Savannah, Georgia. —The preceding comment was added by (WT-en) Eco84 (talk • contribs)
 * Keep. While the article currently reads like an advertisement, it looks like a valid destination and is a place that people might want to visit (their web site indicates that visitors can purchase passes), so I'm not sure there is anything in the deletion policy that would justify a deletion. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 13:02, 22 April 2012 (EDT)
 * Keep the article needs a lot of work but The Landings looks like a 'real' place (at least by the What is an article definition). Someone needing several layers of insulation from reality may appreciate knowing about it. Places are available for short term rent (nightly, weekly) making it definitely a valid tourist destination. (WT-en) Travelpleb 03:07, 24 April 2012 (EDT)
 * Comment: If we do keep the article, perhaps move it to Skidaway Island (see: Wikipedia:Skidaway Island, Georgia), where the community is located, to broaden the scope? (WT-en) Eco84 17:33, 24 April 2012 (EDT)
 * I'd support this proposal, particularly since there may not otherwise be any other good place to put information about the surrounding area outside of the "Landings" private community. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 19:53, 25 April 2012 (EDT)
 * Move/merge to Skidaway Island. Bingo! --(WT-en) Peter Talk 20:43, 25 April 2012 (EDT)
 * Merge & redirect to Skidaway Island. (WT-en) Pashley 21:55, 20 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Moved to Skidaway Island. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 16:23, 2 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:Sy-map.gif

 * Delete. Orphaned map image superseded by Image:Map of Syria.png. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 15:20, 20 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 13:22, 3 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:Jo-map.gif

 * Delete. Orphaned map image superseded by Image:Map of Jordan.png. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 15:31, 20 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 13:22, 3 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:Marshes Clubhouse.jpg, Image:The Marshes.jpg and Image:Brookstreet events.jpg

 * Delete. These are orphaned promotional images for a club in Kanata.  Delete per Image policy. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 16:23, 20 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 13:22, 3 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:View.jpg

 * Delete. Orphaned image of Venice rooftops.  In a city with so much beauty it's tough to imagine a use for this image in a Wikivoyage article, and at just 226x148 it's too small to be of much use even if it was of a usable subject. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 18:33, 20 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 13:22, 3 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:IMG 0534.jpg

 * Delete. Orphaned image of an individual.  Delete per Image policy. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 17:31, 25 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 18:33, 10 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:Catext001.jpg

 * Speedy delete. Orphaned duplicate of Image:Cathedral leon.jpg.  No need for two copies of the same image. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 15:23, 27 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 18:33, 10 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:Beach.JPG

 * Delete. Orphaned image.  The original image might be salvageable if someone wants to de-orphan it, but the current version has a weird yellow border effect that (IMHO) makes it un-usable in a travel guide article.  Delete as an orphaned article per Project:Deletion policy. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 00:14, 28 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 18:33, 10 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:Beach.jpg

 * Delete. Orphaned image.  Like Image:Beach.JPG, the original image might be salvageable if someone wants to de-orphan it, but the current version has a copyright notice on it and no indication of source or license.  Delete as a potential copyvio and as an orphaned article per Project:Deletion policy. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 00:14, 28 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 18:33, 10 June 2012 (EDT)

One month of Southeast Asian diving and culture

 * Delete. While this is marked "usable", it appears to simply be an an outline.  It doesn't look like there's anything to merge, and since it's been more than one year since the last substantial edits this article is subject to deletion. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:22, 10 April 2012 (EDT)
 * Get a diver (Peter?) to check if there is anything worth merging into Scuba diving, then delete. (WT-en) Pashley 23:15, 11 April 2012 (EDT)
 * I don't see anything that needs merging. Could you merge any content that you are concerned about so that this vfd can be resolved?  Alternately, if anyone else could comment it would allow this nomination to move to a resolution. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:35, 22 May 2012 (EDT)
 * My guess is (WT-en) Pashley's comments were referring to the advice about flying and insurance, which Scuba diving does cover. Therefore kill as appropriate. (WT-en) Travelpleb 12:05, 4 June 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 18:36, 10 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:Intramuros Spanish Structures.jpg

 * Delete. The image indicates it was taken from another web site, but there is no indication that it can be re-used CC-SA.  See User talk:(WT-en) Alas for some concerns that were raised with the uploader about licensing. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 13:11, 28 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:33, 12 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:Baluarte de San Diego.jpg

 * Delete. The image indicates it was taken from another web site, but there is no indication that it can be re-used CC-SA.  See User talk:(WT-en) Alas for some concerns that were raised with the uploader about licensing. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 13:11, 28 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:33, 12 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:56783571 01f7938479.jpg

 * Delete. Orphaned image of a non-notable restaurant (?).  Delete per Image policy. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:11, 28 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:33, 12 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:Untitled1.jpg

 * Delete. Orphaned image of a non-descript rocky beach with no indication of location.  Unless someone knows where this was taken and wants to put it in an article it seems unlikely to ever be de-orphaned, so delete per Project:Deletion policy. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:11, 28 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:33, 12 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:Three Goreges Dam.jpg

 * Speedy delete. Orphaned duplicate of Image:Three Gorges Dam.jpg, no need for two copies of the same image. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:11, 28 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:33, 12 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:Melbourne accommodation luxury 8.jpg

 * Delete. Orphaned advertising for a non-notable serviced apartment.  Delete per Image policy. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:11, 28 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:33, 12 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:Image-Image-Neve em itatiaia.jpg and Image:Image-Neve em itatiaia.jpg

 * Speedy delete. Orphaned duplicates of Image:Neve em itatiaia.jpg, no need for three copies of the same image. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:11, 28 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:33, 12 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:Be chadipur.jpg

 * Delete. Orphaned image that appears to be a test.  No location or source, it is only 204x142, and the description is "hi".  Delete as a potential copyvio and an image that is unlikely to ever be de-orphaned per Project:Deletion policy. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:11, 28 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:33, 12 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:Mccloudhotelpics 1.jpg

 * Delete. Orphaned image of a non-notable mercantile.  Delete per Image policy. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:11, 28 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:33, 12 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:Hideaway Bungalow Kuta Lombok.jpg

 * Delete. Orphaned image of a non-notable bungalow.  Delete per Image policy. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:11, 28 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:33, 12 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:IMG 3519n.jpg

 * Speedy delete. Orphaned duplicate of Image:Raven in Yosemite.jpg, no need for two copies of the same image. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:11, 28 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:33, 12 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:Totani Resort.jpg

 * Delete. Orphaned image of a non-notable resort.  Delete per Image policy. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:11, 28 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:33, 12 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:Mvc-001s.jpg

 * Speedy delete. Orphaned duplicate of Image:Templeview2.jpg, no need for two copies of the same image. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:11, 28 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:33, 12 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:Gi-Map D.png

 * Delete. Orphaned map of Gibraltar that has been superseded by Image:Gibraltar-map.png. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:11, 28 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:33, 12 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:Gallery-41729533-500x500.jpg and Image:Pension VICTOR.jpg

 * Delete. Orphaned images of a non-notable hotel.  Delete per Image policy. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:32, 28 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:33, 12 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:Txistu.jpg

 * Delete. Orphaned image of a rod of some sort.  Unless someone knows what this is and wants to de-orphan it, delete per Project:Deletion policy. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:32, 28 May 2012 (EDT)
 * It's a Basque folk instrument, a sort of flute. The article on Vitoria-Gasteiz has mention of the instrument. Whether it should be deorphaned, I have no strong opinion. This image seems to be a previous version of the image used on Wikipedia, so its loss will not dent the world's digital documentation of obscure instruments. (WT-en) Travelpleb 09:28, 31 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:33, 12 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:Picture 071.jpg

 * Delete. Orphaned image of a non-notable souvenir shop.  Delete per Image policy. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:32, 28 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:33, 12 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:LexingtonDowntown.jpg

 * Speedy delete. Orphaned duplicate of Image:LexingtonDowntown.JPG, no need for two copies of the same image. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:32, 28 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:33, 12 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:Villa Naga Maya.jpg

 * Delete. Orphaned image of a non-notable villa.  Delete per Image policy. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:32, 28 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:33, 12 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:Yellowstone July 2007 035.jpg

 * Delete. Orphaned low-quality image of a geyser in Yellowstone.  There are plenty of better images available so this seems unlikely to ever be de-orphaned, and thus should be deleted per Project:Deletion policy. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:32, 28 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:33, 12 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:JadeEmuGuesthouse.jpg

 * Delete. Orphaned image of a non-notable guesthouse.  Delete per Image policy. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:32, 28 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:33, 12 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:Sl1.jpg

 * Delete. Orphaned thumbnail of recognizable individuals. Delete per Image policy. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:32, 28 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:33, 12 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:Sl2.jpg

 * Delete. Orphaned thumbnail of what appears to be some sort of battle re-enactment.  This is a very small image without a source specified, so unless someone knows what this is and wants to de-orphan it, delete per Project:Deletion policy. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:32, 28 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:33, 12 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:Lake Nakuru Entrance Gate.JPG

 * Delete. Orphaned image of a recognizable individual. Delete per Image policy. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:32, 28 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:33, 12 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:YUS 200802 07 01 003.jpg and Image:YUS 200802 07 01 002.jpg

 * Delete. Orphaned images that were apparently uploaded to promote a spa in Kuala Lumpur.  Delete per Image policy. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:32, 28 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:33, 12 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:Isaland View Abseil.JPG and Image:Island View Abseil.JPG

 * Delete. Two copies of the same image, both of a recognizable individual. Delete per Image policy. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:32, 28 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:33, 12 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:IMG 8369.JPG

 * Delete. Orphaned advertising for a cottage rental.  Delete per Image policy. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:32, 28 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:33, 12 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:Mansion.jpg

 * Delete. Orphaned image of a nightclub interior.  Delete per Image policy. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:32, 28 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:33, 12 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:P2080246.JPG

 * Speedy delete. Orphaned duplicate of Image:The Plaza Balikpapan.jpg, no need for two copies of the same image. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:32, 28 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:33, 12 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:Pomelo.jpg

 * Delete. A low-quality image of a citrus fruit, currently only used in the Perak (Malaysia) article. Should pomelo, common throughout South East Asia, be considered worthy of inclusion anywhere in Wikivoyage, there is a much better image on Wikimedia Commons with Creative Commons licencing that is used on Wikipedia. However, I don't think a nondescript non-entity like pomelo deserves any mention on this site.(WT-en) Travelpleb 01:29, 31 May 2012 (EDT)

 * Provided this image is removed from the Perak article then the image would be orphaned and deletion would be appropriate in accordance with the deletion policy. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:34, 31 May 2012 (EDT)

 * Delete this jpeg and substitute the other image. Perak, and especially the region around Ipoh, is famous throughout Malaysia for its pomelos, which are considered to be of high quality. Pomelos may be common in other parts of Southeast Asia, but not in other parts of the Malay Peninsula, so a picture of a pomelo is definitely appropriate for the Perak article. (WT-en) Ikan Kekek 01:39, 31 May 2012 (EDT)

 * I'm with Ikan on this one. I'd never heard of pomelos until I travelled to SE Asia. (WT-en) Pashley 01:49, 31 May 2012 (EDT)

 * Speedy delete - there's now a nice picture with the same name on Wikivoyage Shared, so getting rid of this file will bring the new picture into all the Wikivoyage articles needing pomeloes. (WT-en) Travelpleb 09:19, 31 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 11:28, 16 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:Taiping lake garden.JPG

 * Speedy delete. Orphaned duplicate of Image:Taiping Lake Gardens.jpg, no need for two copies of the same image. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:26, 31 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 11:28, 16 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:Batu Pahat landmark.JPG

 * Speedy delete. Orphaned duplicate of Image:Batu Pahat landmark.jpg, no need for two copies of the same image. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:26, 31 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 11:28, 16 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:Paris-eiffel-tower-hr.jpg

 * Speedy delete. Orphaned duplicate of Image:Paris-eiffel-tower.jpg, no need for two copies of the same image. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:58, 3 June 2012 (EDT)
 * This is the higher resolution version. Can we keep this and delete the other? That seems to be the intention of the uploader — (WT-en) Ravikiran 02:34, 4 June 2012 (EDT)
 * They are both showing as "768 × 1024 pixel, file size: 94 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg" for me, so I think they are the same size and resolution. The original upload of Image:Paris-eiffel-tower.jpg shows a file that is 11kb, but the higher resolution version was then uploaded as a new version of that file on 5-Feb-2005. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 11:00, 4 June 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:12, 18 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:Imlil cafeaksoual.jpg

 * Delete. Orphaned image of a non-notable cafe.  Delete per Image policy. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:58, 3 June 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:12, 18 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:Yosemite-7.jpg

 * Delete. Orphaned image of Yosemite.  That is a star article with plenty of better pictures, so this image is unlikely to ever be de-orphaned and thus should be deleted per Project:Deletion policy. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:58, 3 June 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:12, 18 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:Sierra leone freetown countrylodge.jpg

 * Delete. Orphaned image of a non-notable lodge.  Delete per Image policy. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:58, 3 June 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:12, 18 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:Dreamland bali.jpg

 * Delete. Orphaned image of a non-notable resort.  Delete per Image policy. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:58, 3 June 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:12, 18 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:BuffaloFans.jpg

 * Delete. Orphaned image of a non-notable bar interior.  Delete per Image policy. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:58, 3 June 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:12, 18 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:Huygens surface sum.gif

 * Delete. Orphaned image of the surface of one of Saturn's moons.  While many of us would love to visit, this one will likely not pass the can you sleep there test any time in the near future. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:58, 3 June 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:12, 18 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:Red hook circa 1875.gif

 * Delete. Orphaned historical image.  Historical images are typically not used in articles, so delete per Project:Deletion policy. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:58, 3 June 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:12, 18 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:Rygepolitik.jpg

 * Delete. Orphaned "no smoking" (?) image.  Unless someone wants to de-orphan this delete per Project:Deletion policy. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:58, 3 June 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:12, 18 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:Odessa accomodation.jpg

 * Delete. Orphaned image, and I'm not quite sure what it's supposed to be or if it is just an inside joke (caption is "Typical accomodation in Odessa").  Unless someone wants to de-orphan this delete per Project:Deletion policy. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:58, 3 June 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:12, 18 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:North Cape bar around midnight.jpg

 * Delete. Orphaned image of a non-notable bar interior.  Delete per Image policy. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:58, 3 June 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:12, 18 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:Hotel Doria and Hotel Europa.JPG

 * Delete. Orphaned image of a non-notable hotels.  Delete per Image policy. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:58, 3 June 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:12, 18 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:Luxshire front.jpg

 * Delete. Orphaned image of a country retreat.  Delete per Image policy. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:58, 3 June 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:12, 18 June 2012 (EDT)

Image:Seminyak Beach Resort.JPG

 * Delete. Orphaned image of a beach resort.  Delete per Image policy. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:58, 3 June 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:12, 18 June 2012 (EDT)

Template:VegetarianRestaurant

 * Delete. This is simply an "eat" listing tag, not a template, and thus does not seem very useful.  In addition, per Project:Using Mediawiki templates new templates should be discussed prior to creation, and this one was not discussed. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 10:57, 4 June 2012 (EDT)
 * Delete Full agreement, couldn't be it a speedy delete due to instant creation? (WT-en) Jc8136 12:15, 4 June 2012 (EDT)
 * Delete. It is better if the "eat" listing tag is used; in future, there may be a possibility to add a "vegetarian" parameter to the tag. The template also doesn't account for some restaurants which have both meat and vegetarian options. (WT-en)  J ames A    <font color="#191970">>talk 00:37, 12 June 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:12, 18 June 2012 (EDT)

File:Image-.jpg

 * Speedy delete. Orphaned duplicate of File:A typical Rye street.jpg. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:50, 19 June 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 13:00, 23 June 2012 (EDT)

File:Nepal butchers.jpg

 * Delete. Orphaned image that is also a borderline case for Image policy. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 18:37, 19 June 2012 (EDT)
 * Keep. It's an interesting enough image, and I don't think the people are nearly recognizable enough to rule out the photo. I have restored it in the Kathmandu article, which isn't exactly brimming with brilliant photography. --(WT-en) Peter Talk 22:18, 19 June 2012 (EDT)

Result: Kept. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 13:00, 23 June 2012 (EDT)

title: Wikivoyage:Votes for deletion/June 2012


text:
Wikivoyage:Votes for deletion/March 2007

Archive for Project:Votes for deletion acted on in March 2007. If you can't find the chronicle that interests you here, try Project:Votes for deletion/February 2007 or Project:Votes for deletion/April 2007 for things that may have happened earlier or later, respectively.

User:(WT-en) CandleWithHare/Lodz

 * Delete. A page in my user-space that is no longer needed. (WT-en) CandleWithHare 13:56, 2 March 2007 (EST)

User:(WT-en) CandleWithHare/Reference

 * Delete. A page in my user-space that is no longer needed. (WT-en) CandleWithHare 13:56, 2 March 2007 (EST)

User:(WT-en) CandleWithHare/Test

 * Delete. A page in my user-space that is no longer needed. (WT-en) CandleWithHare 13:56, 2 March 2007 (EST)

User:(WT-en) CandleWithHare/Warsaw

 * Delete. A page in my user-space that is no longer needed. (WT-en) CandleWithHare 13:56, 2 March 2007 (EST)

User:(WT-en) CandleWithHare/Warsaw/Excerpts

 * Delete. A page in my user-space that is no longer needed. (WT-en) CandleWithHare 13:56, 2 March 2007 (EST)

Outcome on all of the above: Deleted per request. -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 16:03, 4 March 2007 (EST)

Image:Espace Killy Ski Map.JPG and others
The following uploads by a single contributor are nominated:
 * Image:Espace Killy Ski Map.JPG
 * Image:Les Arcs ski map.jpg
 * Image:Les Arcs pistes.jpg
 * Image:Bourg Saint Maurice white water.jpg
 * Image:Eurostar at Bourg Saint Maurice.jpg
 * Image:Wembley Stadium Rebuilding.jpg
 * Image:Old Trafford stadium1.jpg

 * Delete. Two maps were taken from ski resort websites.  Contributor didn't understand this was a problem, but agreed to try to get permission for copying.  No permission has yet been indicated.  In addition, I now realize that at least one of the non-map images  Image:Bourg Saint Maurice white water.jpg was also taken from a different website, so I'm now nominating all image contributions from this user. -- (WT-en) Colin 13:53, 26 January 2007 (EST)
 * Alas, these probably need to get looked at one by one. Several, as you point out, are copyvios, but the Wembley Stadium Rebuilding shot has been released into public domain according to the guy on Wikipedia who created it.  That one is definitely a keep. -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 10:04, 15 February 2007 (EST)

I've removed the ski maps and kept Wembley Stadium Rebuilding, but we're overdue to deal with the others. Anybody? My present inclination is to keep the others, having failed to establish that they're copyvios; speak now or forever live with 'em. -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 12:42, 19 February 2007 (EST)

 * Keep, unless we've got proof of copyvio (WT-en) - Cacahuate 19:48, 21 February 2007 (EST)

OK, then it'll be so, at least for now. An occasional eye on these, to be alert for copyvio, wouldn't be a bad idea. -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 15:55, 4 March 2007 (EST)

Outcome: some deleted, some kept. -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 16:03, 4 March 2007 (EST)

Strait of Juan de Fuca
"A shipping channel" - see Talk:Strait of Juan de Fuca ~ 61.91.191.2 - 1 February 2007

 * Delete. Not useful as a region (being an international border, separating the two coasts as Vancouver Island and Olympic Peninsula make better sense as regions for travel), so it's not an exception to the Project:Bodies of water rule. -- (WT-en) Colin 03:23, 1 February 2007 (EST)
 * Keep -- narrowly, and I won't be too upset if the voting goes otherwise. National borders along straits are an unusual case, in that travelers along the straits have reasons to know what's available on the straits themselves, rather than deep in the regions beyond the shores.  IMO our TTCF principle calls for this to be one of our rare exceptions to the BoW rule, and an equally rare article spanning two countries.  However, if someone really feels strongly about deleting it, I won't kvetch. -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 13:00, 19 February 2007 (EST)

 * Is there anything here that won't or can't be covered in one of the 2 other articles? Unless there is, I would say delete (WT-en) - Cacahuate 19:46, 21 February 2007 (EST)

Outcome: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 16:14, 4 March 2007 (EST)

Project:Portuguese Wikivoyage Expedition/Página Principal
Shows up on en:Special:DoubleRedirects - see User talk:(WT-en) Rmx ~ 61.91.191.8 22:29, 1 February 2007 (EST)
 * This seems to have been fixed, so I'm not going to mess with it. -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 16:08, 4 March 2007 (EST)

9.18 Museum

 * Delete - should be (and is in) Shenyang page. (WT-en) ::: Cacahuate 05:58, 4 February 2007 (EST)

 * Keep - redirect to Shenyang ~ 61.91.191.11 06:29, 4 February 2007 (EST)
 * Delete. Not a destination/itinerary/etc. -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 12:54, 19 February 2007 (EST)

Outcome: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 22:05, 4 March 2007 (EST)

Whitewater Kayaking
Needs to be deleted, or redirected, or else renamed Whitewater kayaking ~ 61.91.191.8 08:55, 2 February 2007 (EST)

 * Keep. This can make a nice travel topic, but the garbage needs to be removed, some real info needs to be added and it should be listed under Travel_topics. I'll add some detail, lets see how the voting goes from there.
 * Friday afternoon, a week of work made me braindead. I missed the fact that Kayaking was spelled with a capital here. Have move the content to Whitewater kayaking and redirected Whitewater Kayaking to the new page.

 * Keep - is now a valid redirect, and the page it redirects to has valid content. ~ 61.91.191.11 06:37, 4 February 2007 (EST)

 * Delete - just spam related stuff.

 * Keep. - This can be made useful. -- (WT-en) Sapphire 18:24, 18 February 2007 (EST)
 * Keep. Pretty standard kind of redirect, and Whitewater kayaking is certainly a valid travel topic, if one where our nascent cooperation with WikiOutdoors should be taken into consideration. -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 13:09, 19 February 2007 (EST)
 * Either keep or preferably move the content to Travel activities and leave the old article as a redirect. We still don't have a standard for what is a valid travel article, so it's difficult to say whether something stays or goes.  My preference would be that we move content into more general articles whenever possible, and only create new articles when the content becomes large and complex, similarly to how we handle museums or airports currently. -- (WT-en) Ryan 01:25, 7 March 2007 (EST)

Outcome: Kept with redirect to Whitewater kayaking. -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 10:06, 8 March 2007 (EST)

Gariep Dam

 * Delete. Activities around the dam should be handled by articles for the towns Oranjekrag (need to check this name, might be politically incorrect in the new South Africa and been renamed), Oviston and Bethulie. —The preceding comment was added by (WT-en) NJR ZA (talk • contribs)

 * Keep - redirect to nearest town (or if all else fails to Free State) ~ 61.91.191.11 03:24, 4 February 2007 (EST)

 * Redirect to Colesberg, and make the dam an entry under "Get out". -- (WT-en) Ryan 01:28, 7 March 2007 (EST)

 * Keep - So many changes in South Africa over the last couple of years that it is hard to keep up. The small supporting village (originally called Oranjekrag) next to the dam was actually proclaimed a town in October 1996 and is officially called Gariep Dam. I've updated Gariep Dam to reflect this and will add some detail on the page. --(WT-en) NJR_ZA 03:29, 7 March 2007 (EST)

Outcome: Kept. -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 10:09, 8 March 2007 (EST)

Krakow/Lagiewniki
Not linked to from Krakow or from any other article in the main namespace. See User talk:(WT-en) Sapphire ~ 61.91.191.6 02:04, 6 February 2007 (EST)
 * Seems to be a valid district, but content is empty and since it's not linked from the main namespace we might as well delete, per the guilty until proven philosophy. -- (WT-en) Andrew H. (Sapphire) 02:00, 7 February 2007 (EST)

Outcome: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 10:13, 8 March 2007 (EST)

Hormuz

 * Only thing I find on WP is about the Strait of Hormuz, which is a body of water. (WT-en) ::: Cacahuate 21:34, 8 February 2007 (EST)

Outcome: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 15:17, 8 March 2007 (EST)

Image:Royal Jordanian L-1011.jpg
Delete. There are restrictions added to this image (Middle Eastern articles only) that are clearly not compatible with Project:Copyleft. In addition, it's questionable how much value an image of a single carrier's airplane adds to a travel guide. -- (WT-en) Ryan 13:05, 3 February 2007 (EST)

Object - Do not delete - I am discussing with User:(WT-en) Tsandell how to publicise the agreement with the copyright owner. Which was handwritten and confirmed in person - I think the image is beneficial in showing the traveller what to expect in the local airlines. -- (WT-en) MiddleEastern 17:43, 3 February 2007 (EST)

Comment - Information - I have now provided a transcript of the aggreement I made with the copyright holder on the images talk page --(WT-en) MiddleEastern 17:53, 3 February 2007 (EST)

 * Delete. We need permission to relicense it under the cc-bysa.  "You may use it in your brochures" is insufficient.  A CC-bySA image can be used for any purpose -- any being anything from a tourism brochure to a Fark photo contest where the image is manipulated to show the aircraft on fire or make fun of the photographer.  Yeah, these details are annoying as hell, but we really have to be careful to nail the details down so that we can clearly say to everyone "these are the terms under which you may use anything from our site". -- (WT-en) Colin 19:25, 3 February 2007 (EST)

 * Delete. It's unfortunately fairly obvious that the person giving the permission doesn't understand CC by-sa.  Also, I'm not really sure how useful this pic is, especially as according to Wikipedia RJ no longer fly the Tristrar. (WT-en) Jpatokal 08:46, 4 February 2007 (EST)

 * Further Comment. They do on certain local routes, Wikipedia is somewhat misinformed on the current operations of the L-1011. I've actually flown on RJA's Tristars in Nov and Dec of 2006, whether they use them regularly still I'm not sure, but they certainly still have them in hangars at Aqaba. (WT-en) MiddleEastern 11:39, 4 February 2007 (EST)

 * Delete. Doesn't conform to CC-SA, and not useful in a travel destination guide. -- (WT-en) Paul Richter 00:30, 5 February 2007 (EST)

Outcome: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 15:17, 8 March 2007 (EST)

Cuma

 * Delete unless someone finds a place by this name. Created by an anonymous user with no content.  Wikipedia redirects to Wikipedia:Kymi, which is said to be "two ancient Greek cities".  Creating such an article here would be a stretch of Project:What is an article? and a bit of a Project:Slippery slope since it's not clear what travel content would be added. -- (WT-en) Ryan 23:13, 13 February 2007 (EST)

Outcome: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 13:10, 9 March 2007 (EST)

Rietveld Schroder House

 * Delete I moved all info to Utrecht where the house is located. (WT-en) Fastestdogever 00:47, 22 February 2007 (EST)

I agree. I got carried away when I saw a red missing link to the Rietveld house in another article. Thanx, (WT-en) 3wisemen 27 Feb

Outcome: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 13:16, 9 March 2007 (EST)

Talk:Santa Rosa/First try

 * What the hell is this?  I'm a bit surprised it's been around for so long... delete. -- (WT-en) Sapphire 04:41, 16 February 2007 (EST)
 * Delete --(WT-en) NJR_ZA 05:45, 7 March 2007 (EST)

Outcome: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 13:21, 9 March 2007 (EST)

Image:Santacruz Domestic Airport.jpg

 * Source helpfully provided. Unfortunately is a copyvio — (WT-en) Ravikiran 02:21, 14 February 2007 (EST)

Outcome: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 13:28, 9 March 2007 (EST)

Image:Mumbai taxi.jpg

 * Source helpfully provided. Unfortunately is a copyvio — (WT-en) Ravikiran 02:21, 14 February 2007 (EST)

Outcome: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 17:24, 9 March 2007 (EST)

Image:Best cbd wad.jpg

 * Source helpfully provided. Unfortunately is a copyvio — (WT-en) Ravikiran 02:21, 14 February 2007 (EST)

Outcome: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 17:30, 9 March 2007 (EST)

Image:WTF_Logo_JPEG.JPG
This was probably part of the logo voting way back, but maybe we don't really want this one around.
 * Project:Bad jokes and other deleted nonsense. — (WT-en) Ravikiran 10:11, 15 February 2007 (EST)

Outcome: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 18:27, 9 March 2007 (EST)

Image:Bangalore Bus.jpg

 * Source helpfully provided. Unfortunately is a copyvio — (WT-en) Ravikiran 02:21, 14 February 2007 (EST)

Outcome: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 22:54, 10 March 2007 (EST)

All images by User:(WT-en) Strandvelder
A new user that has created Gansbaai (I reverted that page as almost all the content was copyvio from a number of sources). I have all also found that at least two of the images are copyvio and suspect that the rest are as well:
 * image:Walkerbay1.jpg
 * image:Gansbaaiharbour.jpg
 * image:Lipariasplendens.jpg (copyvio http://www.africaguide.com/images/library/flora/010.jpg)
 * image:Oystercatcher1.jpg
 * image:Proteacompacta1.jpg
 * image:Klipgat1.jpg
 * image:View1.jpg
 * image:Churchbaardskeerdersbos.jpg (http://www.whalecoasthorsetrails.co.za/2_area_hermanus_horse_trials.htm)
 * image:Sugarbird.jpg
 * image:Horsetrails.jpg
 * image:Whale1.jpg
 * image:Whale2.jpg

Quite a pity as Gansbaai should

Comment : all pictures and text are by myself (martin groos, using "strandvelder" since my own first name was taken). Both www.africaguide.com and www.whalecoasthorsetrails.co.za have used my pictures with my opinion. You might very well find more of the above pictures on the web. All text is mine as well, but pieces of it might be found on www.danger-point-peninsula.co.za and other websites dealing with Gansbaai. All of this text has been written in my marketing capacity for the Gansbaai Tourism Board. There is no copyright on any of the text or any images. If any of this still constitues "copyvio" so be it and please delete. If not, please advise how I can state all of this is in the public domain. Thanks

 * Martin, thanks for replying here. Normally we mark pages as suspected copyright violations and give the owners time to respond, but in this case I was getting far to many copies of the text and photos already on the internet and decided blank the article and request deletion of the photos. I'm not totally sure how we continue from here. Gansbaai definitely deserves a page, but it is rather difficult to accept that we can use something such as image:Sugarbird.jpg when it is clear that is is a cropped and mirrored version of the image on another webpage where the content is marked as copyright farm 215. One possibility would be if the  Gansbaai Tourism Board have a website where they can display these images and state that it is in the public domain. -- (WT-en) NJR_ZA 09:42, 18 February 2007 (EST)

 * If the person contributing the material produced it himself, and agrees to license it under the CC-By-SA or donate it to the public domain, then everything's fine. As long as we can believe the submitter about this, we can use it.  (For example, the uploaded image of the sugarbird is bigger than the one on the farm215 site, so I see no reason to suspect it was stolen from there.)  If the material has been independently used elsewhere, that's not a problem, even if the other site has a copyright notice on it, as long as the original write/photographer still owns the rights to the material or it's actually public domain. So Keep. - (WT-en) Todd VerBeek 17:37, 18 February 2007 (EST)

 * Keep (how does one withdraw a vfd?) - I think this one is OK. Due to a number of South Africans lately liberally violating copyright for articles they are interested in, I might have overreacted by reverting the page and putting the images up for vfd. I have checked and there is a M Groos at Gansbaai Tourism. At least one page does accolade that he contributed text. Martin, my apologies and thank you for an excellent article --(WT-en) NJR_ZA 00:10, 19 February 2007 (EST)
 * Keep. -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 13:11, 19 February 2007 (EST)

Outcome: Kept, but Image:Horsetrails.jpg has been re-proposed for deletion, for other reasons. -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 22:57, 10 March 2007 (EST)

Image:Polmontflagnew.gif

 * Delete - do we need city flags on the pages? It's not a huge deal, and I don't feel that strongly about it, but how does it aid the traveler in any way? I can't see why any images other than helpful photos that give a sense of the place and maps should be on the pages. This makes more sense on Wikipedia, but not here... (WT-en) - Cacahuate 19:38, 21 February 2007 (EST)

Outcome: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 23:10, 10 March 2007 (EST)

Illinois institute of technology

 * Delete. Doesn't pass the "Can you sleep there test. (WT-en) Fastestdogever 19:00, 14 February 2007 (EST)
 * Redirect to Chicago. This is sorta-kinda-maybe the usual way of handling universities.  Because of the miscapitalization, I wouldn't object strenuously to deleting, however. -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 13:18, 9 March 2007 (EST)

Outcome: Redirected to Chicago. -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 23:23, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

The Flying Pig non-articles by 213.84.167.89

 * Amsterdam cheap accomodation
 * Hostel in amsterdam
 * Flying pig hostel
 * Flying pig amsterdam
 * Flyingpig
 * Hostels amsterdam
 * Amsterdam hostels
 * Flying pig beach hostel
 * Flying pig uptown hostel
 * Flying pig downtown hostel

I deleted The Flying Pig listing from Amsterdam when I saw them spamming us, please also revert that edit of mine when these are gone. The Flying Pig is probably a place travelers should know about, even if they feel they have to spam WT. --(WT-en) NJR_ZA 07:11, 22 February 2007 (EST)
 * Done. — (WT-en) Ravikiran 08:18, 22 February 2007 (EST)

Image:Lummi-holidays.jpg

 * Tiny image of a place to stay. Images should illustrate the a destination rather than an individual place to sleep, eat, or drink unless the architecture of the building is noteworthy as a place to See in its own right. -- (WT-en) Colin 22:05, 22 February 2007 (EST)

Outcome: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 23:26, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

Kaleshwar Temple, Nerur

 * Delete - Non-article

Outcome: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 09:07, 14 March 2007 (EDT)

Samantha gummerson

 * Non-article - (WT-en) Fastestdogever 18:01, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

Outcome: Speedy delete. -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 09:15, 14 March 2007 (EDT)

Template:FlandersRegions

 * We don't use templates for those. — (WT-en) Ravikiran 11:59, 23 February 2007 (EST)

Outcome: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 09:54, 14 March 2007 (EDT)

Image:Druk white lotus school.jpg
Pretty pic, but unlikely to be model licensed, and of marginal relevance to the traveller anyway. (WT-en) Jpatokal 05:19, 25 February 2007 (EST)
 * Kind of a shame to delete it, as it really is a nice pic (and Jani, I do think it's "relevant" to the volunteer, which is the section it illustrates), but there's no way it can survive the model-release issues. -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 23:49, 15 March 2007 (EDT)

Outcome: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 12:34, 16 March 2007 (EDT)

Gobardhan
No context at all, except that it is a "village in India". There are 50 million Indian villages and not all of them will deserve an article. Google search gives me nothing because Gobardhan is way more popular as a personal name than as a place. — (WT-en) Ravikiran 06:09, 16 February 2007 (EST)

 * Personally, I would prefer not to make a judgment as to what villages do or do not "deserve" an article. (You'd be amazed at the tininess of some towns in, say, North Dakota that have valid articles.) To me the question is whether there's a place with this name that passes the you-can-sleep-there test.  Got any insights on this question before we delete? -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 13:26, 9 March 2007 (EST)
 * Sorry for not responding earlier, but for the record, the reasoning is here: Before it passes the is-it-a-place-where-you-can-sleep test, it should first pass the is-it-a-place test. I could not find a record of such a place on the internet. For a remote Indian village, that is no proof of non-existence, but it certainly means that there is no prospect of any reasonable guide being written about it in the near future. — (WT-en) Ravikiran 12:44, 20 March 2007 (EDT)

Outcome: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 17:38, 16 March 2007 (EDT)

Images by User:(WT-en) Subra Chinnu
Image:PURIBEACH.jpg, Image:PURISTATION.jpg, Image:HOLIDAYPURI.jpg, Image:PURIBEST.JPG, Image:HolidayResort.jpg, Image:Mayfair.jpg, Image:Nilachal.jpg, Image:PuriBest.JPG, Image:Holiday resort.jpg, Image:Puri-station.jpg. No license specified, and at least some are clear copyvios, making them all suspect. (WT-en) Jpatokal 04:49, 19 February 2007 (EST)
 * There are also model-release issues with several. Delete unless it's clear they're OK. -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 09:16, 15 March 2007 (EDT)

Outcome: all deleted. -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 20:59, 16 March 2007 (EDT)

Mithur
Delete - Bad format, completely in note-form, no travel guidance, just an info article on the village --(WT-en) MiddleEastern 11:49, 17 March 2007 (EDT)

 * May someone else can edit it rather,
 * Keep. Clear, as there's such a place.  The usual procedure in cases like this is for someone to get the article into a standard template form so that others can populate it. -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 12:50, 17 March 2007 (EDT)
 * Suppose you are right Bill (unsure if that's your real name, sorry!). Although I do think it needs a complete re-write, all the article has is local info and no real structure. I'm willing to rebuild it if no-one else is interested? --(WT-en) MiddleEastern 18:04, 17 March 2007 (EDT)

Withdraw nomination - Someone has already re-formatted to our accepted article format. I've given the content a little TLC - take a look at the current version here, any thoughts? --(WT-en) MiddleEastern 18:11, 17 March 2007 (EDT)

Outcome: kept, nomination withdrawn – (WT-en) cacahuate  talk 23:50, 17 March 2007 (EDT)

Image:Neverland.jpg
I've been there, and it's nothing like this picture (a lot worse). -- (WT-en) Paul Richter 22:33, 19 March 2007 (EDT)

Outcome: I speedy deleted this because we really really don't want to attract the attention of That Very Aggressive Company's Lawyers. -- (WT-en) Colin 22:52, 19 March 2007 (EDT)

 * Whose that company? The place where everyone is happy? -- (WT-en) Sapphire • (Talk) • 23:16, 19 March 2007 (EDT)

Mauritian education
Not a travel topic, only line is mauritius has a lot of stuff to learn about it. --(WT-en) MiddleEastern 17:03, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
 * Delete -- (WT-en) Colin 22:40, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
 * Outcome: Speedy deleted. — (WT-en) Ravikiran 12:35, 20 March 2007 (EDT)

Image:Lantern20.jpeg

 * Delete - looks like a copyvio from http://starswebworx.lc-stars.com/swiss_photo/pictures1.htm — site states: © All photos are copyright of Han van Loon. However I allow a form of creative commons licence for private use. Please note that images have been compressed from higher resolution images to reduce download times. If you would like to use these images for private (NOT commercial) purposes, please feel free to download them and email me to tell me what you found worth copying or what you liked looking at. — doesn't specify which Creative Commons license, but obviously not 1.0 since "non-commercial" is an option in the newer licenses, and isn't compatible with our Project:Copyleft (WT-en) - Cacahuate 20:17, 1 March 2007 (EST)
 * Delete - as per copyvio --(WT-en) NJR_ZA 03:31, 11 March 2007 (EDT)

Portland state unviersity

 * Delete - not an article. The text can be copied and pasted into Portland. There's only 1 line, anyway. (WT-en) Upamanyuwikivoyage 09:31, 4 March 2007 (EST)
 * Redirect - agree this will not be an article. I went ahead and redirected. The search engines like redirects for some reason and the redirect will prevent recreation later. I am alright with deleting, but a redirect is easy and takes little space. Of course there is the spelling issue. :) -- (WT-en) Tom Holland (xltel) 16:57, 4 March 2007 (EST)
 * Redirect, move to correct spelling, delete original to avoid double redirect - Tom has already done the redirect --(WT-en) NJR_ZA 03:30, 11 March 2007 (EDT)

San Ignacio Cayo

 * Delete . This page is for the same city as San Ignacio (Belize). --(WT-en) Flip666 writeme! • 10:22, 7 March 2007 (EST)
 * Redirect --(WT-en) NJR_ZA 03:36, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
 * Of course a Redirect would be the much better idea here! --(WT-en) Flip666 writeme! • 07:13, 11 March 2007 (EDT)

Cape Point and Cape of Good Hope
There are no mentionable sleep, drink or buy option available at Cape Point or Cape of Good Hope. These places should be covered under Table Mountain National Park. I would suggest: --(WT-en) NJR_ZA 04:02, 10 March 2007 (EST)
 * Move - Cape of Good Hope to Table Mountain National Park and reformat using National Park template.
 * Redirect - Cape Point to Table Mountain National Park
 * Support for both. I will suggest the same on de: . --(WT-en) Flip666 writeme! • 18:35, 17 March 2007 (EDT)

Image:Horsetrails.jpg
This was one of several images included in a "general" VFD (see the March archive) on which the decision was to keep the articles, as the copyvio issue was resolved in a thoroughly satisfactory manner. Unfortunately, this image has another problem: lots of identifiable people with no model releases. I'm not sure whether protocol requires re-evaluating this one separately since the reason for deleting it has changed, but to be on the safe side, here it is for discussion. -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 23:05, 10 March 2007 (EST)

 * Delete - there is enough photos in the Gansbaai article already and there is no way to crop or edit this photo to remove identifiable people --(WT-en) NJR_ZA 09:07, 12 March 2007 (EDT)

Image:Llanberis1.jpg
From the "fold" apparent on the left side of the image, this looks like it was appropriated from some hard copy somewhere. -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 10:03, 8 March 2007 (EST)
 * Delete - Seems to have been digitally manipulated as well. --(WT-en) NJR_ZA 03:37, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
 * Delete - and the user who uploaded it is no longer active. --(WT-en) Flip666 writeme! • 09:19, 12 March 2007 (EDT)

Rahel

 * Delete - a non article --(WT-en) NJR_ZA 09:03, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
 * Delete - can't find anything on it either - in the history it once said it was a city in Africa, but doesn't seem to come up with anything on google or WP – (WT-en) cacahuate  talk 02:10, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

Frankenstein Castle

 * Redirect to Darmstadt, but first move the information in there to Darmstadt --(WT-en) NJR_ZA 08:59, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
 * Redirect. --(WT-en) Flip666 writeme! • 09:29, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
 * Redirect (WT-en) WindHorse 00:01, 23 March 2007 (EDT)

কাশগর
Delete. I don't think we should start have foreign script pages on en:. Only a redirect. -- (WT-en) DanielC 16:31, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
 * I don't see the harm of having a foreign-script page as long as it redirects to something in English. WTP?  And it may be useful to the reader who's more fluent with the language of that script than with English.  Redirect as the original author intended. -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 17:34, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
 * I concur with (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill (WT-en) Kiwiexile 21:49, 17 March 2007 (EDT)
 * Me too, keep --(WT-en) MiddleEastern 08:09, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
 * Keep - As long as they are redirected I don't see any harm --(WT-en) NJR_ZA 13:46, 18 March 2007 (EDT)

 * keep with redirect

Outcome: Redirected to Kashgar. -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 14:56, 30 March 2007 (EDT)

Krakow/Las Wolski
Not linked to from Krakow or from any other article in the main namespace. See User talk:(WT-en) Sapphire ~ 61.91.191.6 02:04, 6 February 2007 (EST)
 * Delete it's a sub-district, even though Krakow's districts are large we don't need break them down any further. -- (WT-en) Andrew H. (Sapphire) 02:00, 7 February 2007 (EST)
 * This and some of the others below appear to have some content that isn't present elsewhere in the Krakow pages. Before they're deleted (if they are), the content should be moved to other, appropriate articles, but I lack the knowledge of Krakow to do that.  Can someone step up, please?  I suggest we keep the non-empty sub-districts around until that's done. -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 17:21, 9 March 2007 (EST)

Outcome: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 15:06, 30 March 2007 (EDT)

Krakow/Mogila
Not linked to from Krakow or from any other article in the main namespace. See User talk:(WT-en) Sapphire ~ 61.91.191.6 02:04, 6 February 2007 (EST)
 * Delete it's a sub-district, even though Krakow's districts are large we don't need break them down any further. -- (WT-en) Andrew H. (Sapphire) 02:00, 7 February 2007 (EST)

Outcome: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 15:20, 30 March 2007 (EDT)

Krakow/Plaszow
Not linked to from Krakow or from any other article in the main namespace. See User talk:(WT-en) Sapphire ~ 61.91.191.6 02:04, 6 February 2007 (EST)
 * Delete it's a sub-district, even though Krakow's districts are large we don't need break them down any further. -- (WT-en) Andrew H. (Sapphire) 02:00, 7 February 2007 (EST)

Krakow/Prokocim
Not linked to from Krakow or from any other article in the main namespace. See User talk:(WT-en) Sapphire ~ 61.91.191.6 02:04, 6 February 2007 (EST)
 * Seems to be a valid district, but content is empty and since it's not linked from the main namespace we might as well delete, per the guilty until proven philosophy. -- (WT-en) Andrew H. (Sapphire) 02:00, 7 February 2007 (EST)

Krakow/Salwator
Not linked to from Krakow or from any other article in the main namespace. See User talk:(WT-en) Sapphire ~ 61.91.191.6 02:04, 6 February 2007 (EST)
 * Delete it's a sub-district, even though Krakow's districts are large we don't need break them down any further. -- (WT-en) Andrew H. (Sapphire) 02:00, 7 February 2007 (EST)

Krakow/Wola Justowska
Not linked to from Krakow or from any other article in the main namespace. See User talk:(WT-en) Sapphire ~ 61.91.191.6 02:04, 6 February 2007 (EST)
 * Delete it's a sub-district, even though Krakow's districts are large we don't need break them down any further. -- (WT-en) Andrew H. (Sapphire) 02:00, 7 February 2007 (EST)

Outcome for all of the above Krakow articles: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 17:14, 30 March 2007 (EDT)

MediaWiki:FlandersRegions
Listed on Special:BrokenRedirects ~ 61.91.191.2 14:44, 25 March 2007 (EDT)

 * Delete. -- (WT-en) Ryan (talk) 15:01, 25 March 2007 (EDT)

 * I speedy deleted this one - the target of the redirect has already been through the vfd process and been deleted --(WT-en) NJR_ZA 15:03, 25 March 2007 (EDT)

Image:Land4-204x297.jpg

 * Reccommend for deletion Looks suspiciously like a commercial brochure pic.. it has no origin information (WT-en) MiddleEastern 15:50, 5 March 2007 (EST)
 * Delete per guilty until proven innocent theory. -- (WT-en) Sapphire • (Talk) • 01:54, 11 March 2007 (EST)
 * Delete --(WT-en) NJR_ZA 03:35, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
 * This one is on shared, I'll copy this vfd request there --(WT-en) NJR_ZA 14:05, 25 March 2007 (EDT)

Verdict: Deleted – (WT-en) cacahuate  talk 00:52, 31 March 2007 (EDT)

Electronics and entertainment shopping in Thailand

 * Delete. Not a valid travel article topic. Merge to Thailand article (WT-en) Hkpatv 04:34, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
 * Keep. It is useful info and too long to merge well. (WT-en) Pashley 04:43, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
 * Delete. I think it's too much of a slippery slope. -- (WT-en) Sapphire • (Talk) • 11:22, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
 * Delete - This can easily go into Thailand with just a little copyediting and reformatting. --(WT-en) NJR_ZA 09:12, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
 * Keep The article's beeen around for 3 years and is just the sort of stuff that my wife would love. I concur that it is too long to merge well into Thailand - especially as that article has the edit rubric:
 * WARNING: This page is 80 kilobytes long; some browsers may have problems editing pages approaching or longer than 32kb. Please consider breaking the page into smaller sections. [Incidentally, shouldn't that automatic warning be on the lines of: some browsers may have problems displaying pages approaching or longer than 32kb. ?]
 * ...(WT-en) Gaimhreadhan (kiwiexile at DMOZ) • 19:51, 22 March 2007 (EDT)

 * Keep It is undeniable that many cities attract travelers because of their specialized shopping, and because WT is on line, we are in the privileged position to offer this information - which for obvious reasons printed guides cannot. Basically, I think the info should be written into the main article initially, but split off when it becomes to large. I can envisage similar articles being produced for handicrafts in some cities. (WT-en) WindHorse 23:50, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
 * Keep per the three "keep" votes above, plus the potential for the article to cover stuff such as Pantip Plaza (which it doesn't yet mention) in more detail than Bangkok/Sukhumvit. ~ 61.91.191.10 03:27, 30 March 2007 (EDT)

Verdict: Kept, not a consensus to delete – (WT-en) cacahuate  talk 00:52, 31 March 2007 (EDT)

Travel Guide Agra
Delete. Copyvio (GNU FDL). See wikipedia:Travel Guide Agra, which is also an AfD. (WT-en) Upamanyuwikivoyage • ( Talk ) • ( (WT-en) Travel ) • 07:46, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
 * Actually, the person who wrote it on WP copied it here after it was prodded there, saying that the content is better suited to Wikivoyage. So as such, we can assume that he is licensing it under cc-by-sa (or does not really care either way.) Of course, it is not according to our format, but it contains useful information. So it should be reformatted, moved to Agra and then redirected. — (WT-en) Ravikiran 07:57, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
 * OK. But I'll leave a note on his talk page explaining the difference between CC-SA 1.0 and GFDL. Moving this to Talk:Agra would probably be the best thing to do. We could then edit the stuff and merge it into appropriate sections of the article. (WT-en) Upamanyuwikivoyage • ( Talk ) • ( (WT-en) Travel ) • 09:40, 16 March 2007 (EDT)

 * Incorporating the info into the Agra article and either deleting or redirecting this is OK; this is short enough to make that easy.
 * However, there is another alternative. This could be expanded into an itinerary, perhaps "One day in Agra" or some such. See One day in Tokyo or Two_days_in_Mumbai for examples of the sort of thing. A visit to Agra is a very common trip, enough to justify having an itinerary for it. Anyone want to do the work of expanding it into that? Perhaps the original writer? (WT-en) Pashley 20:59, 17 March 2007 (EDT)

Verdict: Kept - I added the Merge template to the article, and we can continue to discuss what to do with it on the article's talk page – (WT-en) cacahuate  talk 01:04, 31 March 2007 (EDT)

Bus Routes in Jakarta and Jakarta Bus Routes

 * Delete We have not added these kind of pages in the past, one reason is they are hard to maintain. Do we want to start now? -- (WT-en) Tom Holland (xltel) 14:15, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
 * No. Especially as nobody, local or otherwise, rides ordinary buses in Jakarta if they can avoid it. (WT-en) Jpatokal 12:29, 19 March 2007 (EDT)

 * Keep, but watch I don't think we want to risk offending whoever has obviously taken some care and time compiling these two lists. I think we can be a little more ffriendly and cherishing of effort (if sometimes misguided) than projects with a larger number of contributors such as the English Wikipedia (where there is a powerful deletionist tendency).

I would suggest:

 * 1) Combining the two articles into one
 * 2) Watching for (say) 3 months to see if they are updated or expanded before taking a decision.

Alternatively, is there an (official) website that could be linked to? (WT-en) Gaimhreadhan 10:51, 22 March 2007 (EDT)

 * Absorb Delete changed opinion in view of Cacahuate's comments (WT-en) WindHorse 04:33, 2 April 2007 (EDT)
 * rather than just delete, move info on routes operating in main business/tourist areas to main article. Leave a note on author's page and article discussion suggesting this. I feel we should always try to modify and use info rather than delete if possible. (WT-en) WindHorse 00:01, 23 March 2007 (EDT)

 * Delete. We are not an encyclopedia. We should only mention the routes relevant to each site in their paragraph. -- (WT-en) DanielC 16:52, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
 * Delete. -- (WT-en) Colin 18:45, 26 March 2007 (EDT)

 * Delete - At a glance it looks like most of the Jakarta articles have the bus lines, etc in them already, and these articles are just basic lists of info, which don't seem very user friendly to someone not already familiar with Jakarta anyway – (WT-en) cacahuate  talk 23:17, 31 March 2007 (EDT)

For the moment, I have deleted JBR but kept BRJ, since they appeared redundant. BRJ will be deleted shortly too, unless someone argues strongly against it. -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 14:29, 7 April 2007 (EDT)

Outcome: Deleted - – (WT-en) cacahuate  talk 18:22, 10 April 2007 (EDT)

North weald airfield

 * Delete per Project:What is an article?. Capitalization is also incorrect per Project:Article naming conventions, so a redirect probably isn't worthwhile. -- (WT-en) Ryan (talk) 15:16, 24 March 2007 (EDT)

 * Delete (and I concur with Ryan for reasoning)...(WT-en) Gaimhreadhan (kiwiexile at DMOZ) • 16:11, 24 March 2007 (EDT)

Outcome: kept, was already redirected – (WT-en) cacahuate  talk 18:22, 10 April 2007 (EDT)

Project:Subpages help
Redundant page resulting from an article being created with an incorrect name and then moved to another incorrect name (or something like that). ~ 61.91.191.2 13:06, 25 March 2007 (EDT)

 * Delete unless someone wants to actually write a help page on this topic (not recommending that, but it's the only way I could see this being worth keeping). -- (WT-en) Ryan (talk) 15:01, 25 March 2007 (EDT)

Outcome: Deleted – (WT-en) cacahuate  talk 18:22, 10 April 2007 (EDT)

Image:Santiago.jpg

 * Delete. Image is marked PD, but there is clearly a watermark of some kind in the background so without further indication of the source for this image I suspect an accidental copyvio.  To the uploader: please see Project:Copyleft. -- (WT-en) Ryan (talk) 14:35, 25 March 2007 (EDT)
 * Delete --(WT-en) NJR_ZA 00:33, 27 March 2007 (EDT)

Outcome: Deleted – (WT-en) cacahuate  talk 18:22, 10 April 2007 (EDT)

London to Geneva
Contains only an empty city template, has no itinerary-related content ~ 61.91.191.2 14:52, 25 March 2007 (EDT)

 * Delete. -- (WT-en) Ryan (talk) 15:01, 25 March 2007 (EDT)

Outcome: Deleted – (WT-en) cacahuate  talk 18:22, 10 April 2007 (EDT)

Itinerary A
Content merged into Nara per tag ~ 61.91.191.2 16:34, 25 March 2007 (EDT)
 * Delete --(WT-en) NJR_ZA 00:30, 27 March 2007 (EDT)

Outcome: Deleted – (WT-en) cacahuate  talk 18:22, 10 April 2007 (EDT)

Itinerary B
Content merged into Nara per tag ~ 61.91.191.2 16:34, 25 March 2007 (EDT)
 * Delete --(WT-en) NJR_ZA 00:31, 27 March 2007 (EDT)

Outcome: Deleted – (WT-en) cacahuate  talk 18:22, 10 April 2007 (EDT)

Itinerary C
Content merged into Nara per tag ~ 61.91.191.2 16:34, 25 March 2007 (EDT)
 * Delete --(WT-en) NJR_ZA 00:31, 27 March 2007 (EDT)

Outcome: Deleted – (WT-en) cacahuate  talk 18:22, 10 April 2007 (EDT)

Zangam city
Has been a broken redirect ever since it was created in July'06 ~ 61.91.191.2 17:51, 25 March 2007 (EDT)

Outcome: Deleted – (WT-en) cacahuate  talk 18:22, 10 April 2007 (EDT)

Zara Vecchia
Has been a broken redirect ever since it was created in July'06 ~ 61.91.191.2 17:51, 25 March 2007 (EDT)
 * Keep - Create an outline for the redirect target article --(WT-en) NJR_ZA 15:10, 26 March 2007 (EDT)

Outcome: Kept – (WT-en) cacahuate  talk 18:22, 10 April 2007 (EDT)

Zuzzar
Has been a broken redirect ever since it was created in July'06 ~ 61.91.191.2 17:51, 25 March 2007 (EDT)
 * Keep - Create an outline for the redirect target --(WT-en) NJR_ZA 14:56, 26 March 2007 (EDT)

Outcome: Kept – (WT-en) cacahuate  talk 18:22, 10 April 2007 (EDT)

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/


text:
Wikivoyage:Votes for deletion/March 2008

Archive for Project:Votes for deletion acted on in March 2008. If you can't find the chronicle that interests you here, try Project:Votes for deletion/February 2008 or Project:Votes for deletion/April 2008 for things that may have happened earlier or later, respectively.

Image:Shiraz.jpg

 * Delete(re the above images: Apparently the copyright owner released them for use in wikipedia. Wikivoyage is definitely not wikipedia. --(WT-en) Wandering 14:07, 1 February 2008 (EST)

Outcome: Deleted --(WT-en) Nick 00:35, 3 March 2008 (EST)

Colby (Wisconsin) & Pluto
Created by page creation troll. Please check Special:Contributions/72.87.57.201 & Special:Contributions/(WT-en) KevinNSaisi and delete the lot - I'm not going to individually list any more here. Note that some have been created/VFD'd/deleted before. ~ 203.144.143.4 12:17, 25 January 2008 (EST)

Jan.28th: Many have since been speedy deleted, but more have now been created. This list may be incomplete:
 * Ridgedale
 * Outcome: Deleted --(WT-en) Nick 00:50, 3 March 2008 (EST)

 * Woodstock (New Hampshire)
 * Outcome: Deleted --(WT-en) Nick 00:50, 3 March 2008 (EST)

 * Franklin (New Hampshire)
 * Outcome: Deleted --(WT-en) Nick 00:50, 3 March 2008 (EST)

 * Acton
 * Outcome: Already Deleted --(WT-en) Nick 00:50, 3 March 2008 (EST)

 * Kennebec and Moose River Valleys
 * Outcome: Kept --(WT-en) Nick 00:50, 3 March 2008 (EST)

 * I've removed pages that were speedy deleted. In general pages which are candidate for speedy deletion probably don't need to be listed here unless a few hours go by without an admin removing them. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 23:24, 27 January 2008 (EST)
 * This one seems to be a valid article, it was created in 2006, has a lot of content and is linked to from Maine as part of the hierarchy. Also does not have a vfd tag. I'm deleting and archiving the rest; this one I'll keep. Should anyone have a problem with the outcome, re-vfd it with a vfd tag on the actual article --(WT-en) Nick 00:43, 3 March 2008 (EST)

Outcome: Colby (Wisconsin) - Deleted --(WT-en) Nick 00:50, 3 March 2008 (EST)

Outcome: Pluto - Already Deleted --(WT-en) Nick 00:50, 3 March 2008 (EST)

Honolulu/Manoa

 * Merge and Redirect with Honolulu. (WT-en) 2old 10:03, 20 February 2008 (EST)

 * Merge and Redirect. There's not that much to Manoa, not enough to justify it's own guide. (WT-en) PerryPlanet 12:14, 20 February 2008 (EST)

 * Merge and Redirect. Agree with (WT-en) PerryPlanet (WT-en) Joel 21:27, 1 March 2008 (EST)

Outcome: Merged and Redirected --(WT-en) Nick 03:55, 10 March 2008 (EDT)

Sewickley, pa
Only a redirect, but a pointless one unless we want to have many similar ones for every city in the states, i.e. Sewickley,pa, Sewickley, Pa, Sewickley, PA, Sewickley, Pennsylvania, etc.
 * Delete (WT-en) Texugo 18:22, 21 February 2008 (EST)

Outcome: Deleted --(WT-en) Nick 03:57, 10 March 2008 (EDT)

PA
Nominated more to answer the following question than anything: Do we intend to start disambiguation and redirection service for all abbreviations? A redirect for NYC is understandable, but PA can be a number of things: the US state of Pennsylvania, the state of Paraná in Brazil, Palo Alto in California, probably a lot more.
 * Globally commonly used abbreviations (USA, UK, NYC, UAE) should definately have redirects, but I don't think we should do it down to this level. KZN is used for KwaZulu-Natal in South Africa, but would any traveller to South Africa really ever search for that? How many people outside the USA really knows what the state abbreviations are? I sure don't. Maybe create a single dictionary article? --(WT-en) Nick 23:54, 2 March 2008 (EST)

Outcome: Deleted --(WT-en) Nick 03:58, 10 March 2008 (EDT)

Cleanup of the No license vfd avalanche
''The following are not in the order they appeared on the original vfd. Most of these were listed en masses as No license or Incorrect license, but Deleted action have been taken on some of them for copyright violations, people in photo or any other reason that does not fit wikivoyage image policy. They have been moved here in order to reduce the total mess on Project:Votes for deletion so that we can actually see what is left to clean up there.''

Outcome on all is : Deleted

Image:On the streets.JPG
No licence. ~ 203.144.143.4 03:12, 30 January 2008 (EST)

Image:City's Akimat.JPG
No licence. ~ 203.144.143.4 21:19, 30 January 2008 (EST)

Image:Cafe "Aigul".JPG
No licence. ~ 203.144.143.4 21:19, 30 January 2008 (EST)

Image:Rutekort regionale.jpg
No licence. ~ 203.144.143.4 21:19, 30 January 2008 (EST)

Image:Centralpark.jpg
No licence. ~ 203.144.143.4 21:19, 30 January 2008 (EST)

Image:Manhattan from empirestate.jpg
No licence. ~ 203.144.143.4 21:19, 30 January 2008 (EST)

Image:Bhadrachlam.jpg
No licence. ~ 203.144.143.4 21:19, 30 January 2008 (EST)

Manchester/Didsbury
A tag was added 17 August 2007  but as no VFD/archive pages link to it  I presume it was never listed here. ~ 203.144.143.4 03:29, 15 January 2008 (EST)

 * Wait. This was part of a restructure om Manchester. I have left a message on Talk:Manchester and suggest we wait another 14 days for feedback --(WT-en) Nick 05:22, 29 February 2008 (EST)

Outcome: Deleted, enough time has elapsed for anyone working on Manchester to merge any info that is still required. --(WT-en) Nick 04:12, 10 March 2008 (EDT)

Manchester/Fallowfield
A tag was added 17 August 2007  but as no VFD/archive pages link to it  I presume it was never listed here. ~ 203.144.143.4 03:29, 15 January 2008 (EST)

 * Wait. This was part of a restructure om Manchester. I have left a message on Talk:Manchester and suggest we wait another 14 days for feedback --(WT-en) Nick 05:23, 29 February 2008 (EST)

Outcome: Deleted, enough time has elapsed for anyone working on Manchester to merge any info that is still required. --(WT-en) Nick 04:12, 10 March 2008 (EDT)

Special:Contributions/72.73.127.244
All orphan/dead-end pages created by the same regular page-creation troll; Coudersport content was copyvio from maps.google.com ~ 203.144.143.4 24 January 2008 (EST)

Coudersport
Outcome: Kept, valid article with eat/drink/sleep info. Still an orphan due to it's region not existing, but that might change at a later stage --(WT-en) Nick 04:41, 10 March 2008 (EDT)

Hammond
Outcome: Templated and Kept, linked to from Gary --(WT-en) Nick 04:41, 10 March 2008 (EDT)

Star
Outcome: Deleted, empty orphaned page --(WT-en) Nick 04:41, 10 March 2008 (EDT)

Yerman
Outcome: Deleted, empty orphaned page --(WT-en) Nick 04:41, 10 March 2008 (EDT)

Image:Crackhead2.jpg
Non travel related. Conflicts with image policy (People in photos). Probable copyright violation --(WT-en) Nick 23:59, 6 March 2008 (EST)

Outcome: Already Deleted --(WT-en) Nick 04:45, 10 March 2008 (EDT)

Image:villanovabb.jpg
Recognizeable college students in the photo. (WT-en) Texugo 05:50, 8 March 2008 (EST)

Outcome: Already Deleted --(WT-en) Nick 04:47, 10 March 2008 (EDT)

Stockholm/Spånga-tensta
See Talk:Stockholm - looks like there shouldn't be any district articles for Stockholm, in which case these should be deleted; and if so, all the district descriptions at Stockholm (only two of which link to the above) should be de-wiki-linked. ~ 203.144.143.4 00:32, 27 January 2008 (EST)

 * Redirect to Stockholm. These articles (based on Stockholm Municipality administrative divisions) have been left untouched for quite some time, and they don't seem to contain any meaningful information not included in the Stockholm article, with the possible exception of two bars and two pizzerias in suburban Spånga, a place that is far off the beaten track for any normal Stockholm tourist. Redirecting might be useful to avoid recreation. (WT-en) Alarm 18:51, 28 January 2008 (EST)

 * I think Norrmalm and Östermalm should redirect to Stockholm, but that Stockholm/Norrmalm and Stockholm/Östermalm etc should be deleted. ~ 203.144.143.4 23:51, 28 January 2008 (EST)

Spånga is very close to Lunda Industria (Industrial estate) which includes the popular Ibis buisness hotel (http://www.ibishotel.se/hotel_start.asp?hotellid=11339) and as such this a usefull article to avoid having to travel into stockholm city center to find food and drink.

Outcome: Redirected as per (WT-en) Alarm's suggestion. He seems to be the main contributor to Stockholm article and should know best --(WT-en) Nick 05:07, 10 March 2008 (EDT)

CC-by-SA-3.0
These images are tagged and conflict with the following policies: Both are linked to from New Orleans/Uptown. ~ 203.144.143.4 05:12, 1 February 2008 (EST)
 * 1) Copyleft (up until 23 January 2008, when images were effectively excluded from the policy without prior notice or discussion )
 * 2) Project:Image policy
 * 3) Project:How to re-use Wikivoyage guides

Image:Magazine6Nov07Winnies.jpg

 * The two above are my images; I saw no indication when I uploaded them that cc-by-sa-3.0 was not an acceptable license here. I have relicensed both as cc-by-sa-all. I hope this takes care of the problem? If a license is not acceptable for Wikivoyage, I suggest that be made more clear in the upload form. Thanks, -- (WT-en) Infrogmation 11:42, 1 February 2008 (EST)

see also:  - VFD'd 26 January 2008

Outcome: Kept - Both have been relicensed by contributor as cc-by-sa-1.0 so any possible objections to them are no longer valid --(WT-en) Nick 05:37, 10 March 2008 (EDT)

Image:Island photo.jpg
A copyvio. ~ 58.8.10.215 06:00, 26 January 2008 (EST)

Outcome: Deleted, copyvio from --(WT-en) Nick 13:34, 10 March 2008 (EDT)

Image:Histana Hotel.jpg
No licence. ~ 58.8.3.194 19:22, 31 January 2008 (EST)

Outcome: Deleted, appears on numerous sites on the internet    and may be a copyvio from any of them. WT really should have fresh and new photos rather then just copies of what everyone else has. --(WT-en) Nick 15:31, 10 March 2008 (EDT)

Image:Bridge.jpg
No licence. ~ 203.144.143.4 03:12, 30 January 2008 (EST)

Outcome: Deleted, small and not used anywhere. Might as well delete rather than spend the time to resolve any possible license issues --(WT-en) Nick 15:43, 10 March 2008 (EDT)

Image:Poland torun.JPG

 * Keep, according to source, this is available under cc-by-sa 1.0. WT updated to reflect correct license info as per WP. --(WT-en) Nick 07:52, 3 March 2008 (EST)

Outcome: Kept --(WT-en) Nick 06:57, 11 March 2008 (EDT)

Image:Fantoft stave church, Bergen.jpg

 * Delete - Additional license requests on commons source (quote source close to photo), not enforceable, but we licensing is already complex and we don't need additional complications like that. --(WT-en) Nick 07:55, 3 March 2008 (EST)

Outcome: Deleted --(WT-en) Nick 06:57, 11 March 2008 (EDT)

Image:Bryggen, Bergen.jpg

 * Delete - Additional license requests on commons source (quote source close to photo), not enforceable, but we licensing is already complex and we don't need additional complications like that. --(WT-en) Nick 07:57, 3 March 2008 (EST)

Outcome: Deleted --(WT-en) Nick 06:57, 11 March 2008 (EDT)

Image:Sonny's Piaza.jpg

 * Keep I do not think images that are not linked anywhere should be deleted, this gives choices to future editors and if moved to shared, gives a variety of choices to different languages. Since memory is no longer an issue, I suggest that we keep them if properly licensed. (WT-en) 2old 11:09, 15 February 2008 (EST)
 * By the way, images that are being used, do not always reflect that on the image page. It may show that the image is not linked to any page, but may be in the case of galleries and other situations. An archive of images will prove useful in the future! (WT-en) 2old 12:23, 16 February 2008 (EST)

 * Delete this one - copyvio from [] --(WT-en) Nick 02:27, 3 March 2008 (EST)

Outcome: Deleted --(WT-en) Nick 06:59, 11 March 2008 (EDT)

Image:Club_Sandwich_With_Fries.jpg
not VFD'd - has 3 tags: +  +

Outcome: Kept, multiple license tags is totally legal and not an issue at all. Select the one you like --(WT-en) Nick 07:09, 11 March 2008 (EDT)

Image:Picodaneblina.jpg
Tagged as a copyvio since 20 March 2007 & VFD'd separately

Outcome: Duplicate listing, dealt with in February, see --(WT-en) Nick 07:14, 11 March 2008 (EDT)

Image:Chopta2.jpg and Image:Chopta.jpg
Other images from the same contributor:-

Image:Chamba.jpg
PD claimed, but presumably a copyvio as above

Image:Himalayas.jpg
PD claimed, but presumably a copyvio as above

Image:Pauri.jpg
PD claimed, but presumably a copyvio as above

Image:Pauri2.jpg
PD claimed, but presumably a copyvio as above

Image:Tungnath.jpg
PD claimed, but presumably a copyvio as above

Image:Ukhimath.jpg
PD claimed, but presumably a copyvio as above

Outcome: All kept, vfd submitter did not cite source of copyright violation on any of these and a diligent internet search did not reveal their usage anywhere else on the internet. If we allow deletion based on presumably a copyvio then we might as well delete all our images. If any of these are indeed copyvio's then they can be re vfd'd with source of infringement cited --(WT-en) Nick 07:20, 11 March 2008 (EDT)

Image:Boxwork.jpg
No licence ~ 203.144.143.4 14:58, 25 January 2008 (EST)

Outcome: Deleted, copyvio from --(WT-en) Nick 07:26, 11 March 2008 (EDT)

Image:Map of East Sussex.JPG
Copyvio - uploaded with tag but is a derivative of work from a CC-by-SA-2.0 source. ~ 203.144.143.4 04:57, 26 January 2008 (EST)

What? why?

this map was taken off a site recommended by another user as open access (hence the map not being quite complete) so therefore there is no infringement of copyright and it is fully in line with wikivoyage's policy on images

(WT-en) Prof Jack 20:00, 4 February 2008 (EST)

 * This is a valid problem. I'm upgrading the license to cc-by-sa-2.0 and will leave a message for the contributor --(WT-en) Nick 07:39, 11 March 2008 (EDT)

Outcome: Kept, licensing has been updated to cc-by-sa-2.0 and it is now totally legal and does not constitute a copyvio anymore --(WT-en) Nick 07:51, 11 March 2008 (EDT)

Vancouver Island and the Gulf Islands
Completely redundant/bogus page. See Galiano Island and this cuckoo-edit. ~ 203.144.143.4 16:36, 24 January 2008 (EST)

 * delete (WT-en) Pashley 08:30, 11 March 2008 (EDT)

Outcome: Deleted --(WT-en) Nick 08:51, 11 March 2008 (EDT)

Image:Lauterbrunnen Valley.jpg
~ 203.144.143.6 18:47, 23 December 2007 (EST)
 * Actually, looks like this one was uploaded by the original photographer, which means that now it's available under CC-by-SA 1.0 and 2.5. -- (WT-en) Sapphire • (Talk) • 05:06, 29 December 2007 (EST)

 * http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Lauterbrunnen-valley.jpg says: This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 2.5 License. In short: you are free to share and make derivative works of the file under the conditions that you appropriately attribute it, and that you distribute it only under a license identical to this one. (my emphasis) - I only looked quickly but couldn't find anything additional here or here or here ~ 58.8.213.154 14:30, 9 January 2008 (EST)

 * Keep. If the photographer uploaded it here, then as Sapphire says, it is also licensed under our 1.0. From the history, it appears that he did. It is labeled "taken by Keith Halstead" and was uploaded by user HalsteadK.

This should have been obvious and the vfd either never entered or closed months ago. (WT-en) Pashley 08:22, 11 March 2008 (EDT)

Outcome: Kept, all uploaded images are automatically cc-by-sa-1.0 as per Special:Upload. Dual licencing 1.0 and 2.5 is not a problem. --(WT-en) Nick 08:54, 11 March 2008 (EDT)

Image:Viking ship in Stockholms strom.jpg
~ 203.144.143.6 18:31, 23 December 2007 (EST)
 * Keep. These is no consensus on deleting images that comply with versions >1.0 of CC by-sa. (WT-en) Jpatokal 02:30, 3 January 2008 (EST)

 * You might as well argue that there's no consensus on deleting images that conflict with Shared:Copyleft. Project:Image policy & Shared:Image_policy both state: licenses must include the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License Version 1.0 ~ 61.7.183.208 03:48, 5 January 2008 (EST)

 * Delete According to Copyleft all contributions MUST be licensed cc-by-sa-1.0 (see the section on Compatible Licenses). The license description here makes no mention of any other license that may include 1.0. Finally, wts:Upload file explicitly says You must select a correct license for the image, or it will be deleted! Since the only correct license is cc-by-sa-1.0, and no other license is legally compatible with it, any image that does not explicitly select it must be deleted. --(WT-en) Wandering 14:21, 22 January 2008 (EST)

 * Strong keep As I stated below, we do use these images properly per their licensing requirements, since we provide image-specific licensing and attribution. Moreover, this licensing fulfills all the essential promises (attribution & share-alike) of our copyleft. Since the text of the copyleft does not match our practice (as is glaringly obvious given the fact that we provide a pulldown menu of all sorts of CC and other accepted licenses on the upload file page), we should update that text, which is quite outdated and ill-maintained. I've now updated the page to remove the most stark contradictions with how we manage files, but there may be more that needs work. In addition to being unnecessary, trying to force ourselves to only use CC-by-SA 1.0 licensed images would be a terrible idea, as it would drastically limit the images that we could use to more or less only files that have been uploaded by Wikivoyageers. It is a shame that in the early days of Wikivoyage we boxed ourselves in to an incompatibility trap, but there's no sense trying to make our incompatibility problem worse than it is already. --(WT-en) Peter Talk 04:48, 23 January 2008 (EST)

''To improve readability and maintenance on this page, the rest of this discussion has been moved to the talk page at CC-by-SA discussion (A). Please continue reading there.''

Outcome: Kept, all uploaded images are automatically cc-by-sa-1.0 as per Special:Upload. Dual licencing 1.0 and 2.5 is not a problem. --(WT-en) Nick 08:57, 11 March 2008 (EDT)

Image:800px-NYCT O7 HEV.jpg
~ 203.144.143.6 18:59, 23 December 2007 (EST)

 * 203.whatever appears to be right. We cannot accept images under CC-by-SA version numbers other than 1.0. In the short term, the solution may indeed be to (with regret) delete some images. In the longer term, we need to look for ways to fix the licensing mess, ideally move the wiki to 3.0. Discussion at Project:Copyleft (WT-en) Pashley 03:23, 27 December 2007 (EST)
 * Keep. These is no consensus on deleting images that comply with versions >1.0 of CC by-sa. (WT-en) Jpatokal 02:30, 3 January 2008 (EST)

 * You might as well argue that there's no consensus on deleting images that conflict with Shared:Copyleft. Project:Image policy & Shared:Image_policy both state: licenses must include the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License Version 1.0 ~ 61.7.183.208 03:54, 5 January 2008 (EST)

 * That's right, and it can be argued that the CC by-sa 2.0 license includes all of 1.0 and then some, in the same way that PD images also grant all the rights of CC by-sa 1.0. (WT-en) Jpatokal 22:33, 5 January 2008 (EST)

 * Strong keep. 61 is right to point out that our practices don't align well with the text at Copyleft, but it would be a huge mistake to start deleting images licensed under later CC attribution and attribution-sharealike licenses. We have loads of such images and it would be a shame to delete them. More importantly though, they fulfill all our licensing needs without violating any of the essential promises of our copyleft. And since we specify licensing for individual images on Wikivoyage, we are using these images properly per their licensing requirements. I agree that we should try to allow CC 3.0 licensed text on our site—compatibility with Wikipedia would be a huge improvement—but that's a separate issue. Some revisions to the text of the copyleft article may be in order, though. --(WT-en) Peter Talk 16:47, 6 January 2008 (EST)

 * Keep. Discussion linked to above seems to be moving in the direction of changing our licensing. That would remove 204.whatever's objection. (WT-en) Pashley 08:27, 11 March 2008 (EDT)

Outcome: Kept, all uploaded images are automatically cc-by-sa-1.0 as per Special:Upload. Dual licencing 1.0 and 2.5 is not a problem. --(WT-en) Nick 08:57, 11 March 2008 (EDT)

The Sampuoton Fish Spa

 * Delete. I really like the phrase "a great pampering moment for you," but this is a non-article. --(WT-en) Peter Talk 17:48, 13 March 2008 (EDT)

Outcome: Speedy deleted.

Image:Hotel Berati.jpg
No licence ~ 203.144.143.4 14:58, 25 January 2008 (EST)

Outcome: Kept, Contributor accepted default cc-by-sa-1.0 as per Special:Upload when image was upload. Image tagged as such --(WT-en) Nick 04:28, 18 March 2008 (EDT)

Image:Bostonskylinewinter.jpg
No licence ~ 203.144.143.4 14:58, 25 January 2008 (EST)

Outcome: Kept, Contributor accepted default cc-by-sa-1.0 as per Special:Upload when image was upload. Image tagged as such --(WT-en) Nick 04:28, 18 March 2008 (EDT)

Image:Puffling IMG 4288.jpg
No licence ~ 203.144.143.4 14:58, 25 January 2008 (EST)

Outcome: Kept, Contributor accepted default cc-by-sa-1.0 as per Special:Upload when image was upload. Image tagged as such --(WT-en) Nick 04:28, 18 March 2008 (EDT)

Image:20070626(008)M.jpg
No licence ~ 203.144.143.4 14:58, 25 January 2008 (EST)

Outcome: Deleted, unused, not travel related, very probable copyvio --(WT-en) Nick 04:28, 18 March 2008 (EDT)

Image:BHOINGIR.jpg
No licence ~ 203.144.143.4 14:58, 25 January 2008 (EST)

Outcome: Kept, Contributor accepted default cc-by-sa-1.0 as per Special:Upload when image was upload. Image tagged as such --(WT-en) Nick 04:28, 18 March 2008 (EDT)

Image:Chachachacha.JPG
No licence ~ 203.144.143.4 14:58, 25 January 2008 (EST)

Outcome: Kept, Contributor accepted default cc-by-sa-1.0 as per Special:Upload when image was upload. Image tagged as such --(WT-en) Nick 04:28, 18 March 2008 (EDT)

Bad honnef
Flagged vfd, but not listed here. --(WT-en) Nick 16:12, 29 February 2008 (EST)
 * Delete, non article --(WT-en) Nick 16:12, 29 February 2008 (EST)
 * I've actually been here on several occasions! Now, I must admit, I've confused a few of these towns, but I know for sure I've been there and it along with Unkel and Königswinter could very well be worth guides, albeit, it would need to moved to Bad Honnef.  It is the site of several interesting sights (i.e. wikipedia:Drachenfels (Siebengebirge).  I, however, would suggest a redirect to Königswinter for the time being since Königswinter and Bad Honnef kinda blend and Königswinter is better known. -- (WT-en) Sapphire • (Talk) • 20:17, 17 March 2008 (EDT)

Outcome: Deleted --(WT-en) Nick 04:36, 18 March 2008 (EDT)

Tiruvanaikka
A temple, content was copyvio --(WT-en) Nick 16:40, 29 February 2008 (EST)

Outcome: Deleted --(WT-en) Nick 04:36, 18 March 2008 (EDT)

Image:Onp ruby beach.jpg
Delete Marked copyright 2005. No license. (WT-en) 2old 14:11, 25 February 2008 (EST)
 * Delete --(WT-en) Jonboy 14:44, 25 February 2008 (EST)

Outcome: Deleted --(WT-en) Nick 04:36, 18 March 2008 (EDT)

Tiruvanaikkaval
Another temple with copyvio content --(WT-en) Nick 16:42, 29 February 2008 (EST)

Outcome: Deleted --(WT-en) Nick 04:36, 18 March 2008 (EDT)

Lake victoria
Body of water and copyvio from --(WT-en) Nick 18:10, 29 February 2008 (EST)

Outcome: Deleted --(WT-en) Nick 04:36, 18 March 2008 (EDT)

Image:D-Day Beaches Travel Map.jpg

 * Delete. The following was added to the talk page:

 * "This map appears in the "D-DAY LANDINGS AND THE BATTLE OF NORMANDY" published by Comite Departmental du Tourisme du Calvados, cdt@cg14.fr, tel. 02 31 27 90 30, www.calvados-tourisme.com.

 * The page with this map reads, "Copyright de Kerpel Day Associates - RC B342104833 - Tel. 02 33 79 09 09"

 * --(WT-en) Chrys 10:30, 2 March 2008 (EST)

 * -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 13:20, 2 March 2008 (EST)

 * delete (WT-en) Pashley 19:28, 11 March 2008 (EDT)

Outcome: Deleted --(WT-en) Nick 04:43, 18 March 2008 (EDT)

Bagdad (California)
Does not seem to qualify as an article --(WT-en) Nick 13:48, 2 March 2008 (EST)
 * Delete. It's not even a ghost town really. --(WT-en) Colin 01:50, 17 March 2008 (EDT)

Outcome: Deleted --(WT-en) Nick 04:43, 18 March 2008 (EDT)

Barnim
May have potential to be converted and renamed as a travel topic, but as it stands it I think it is only fit for deletion --(WT-en) Nick 13:59, 2 March 2008 (EST)

Outcome: Deleted --(WT-en) Nick 04:43, 18 March 2008 (EDT)

Ludlow (California)
Does not seem to qualify as an article --(WT-en) Nick 14:18, 2 March 2008 (EST)
 * Keep. There's a building which on Google Earth appears to be a hotel.  Wikimapia claims it is a hotel.  At the very least, you can eat there since it's next to the Interstate, so I'd say keep. -- (WT-en) Colin 01:56, 17 March 2008 (EDT)

Outcome: Deleted --(WT-en) Nick 04:43, 18 March 2008 (EDT)

Image:LBIMap.jpg
Copyvio from --(WT-en) Nick 15:54, 3 March 2008 (EST)
 * delete (WT-en) Pashley 19:33, 11 March 2008 (EDT)

Outcome: Deleted --(WT-en) Nick 04:43, 18 March 2008 (EDT)

Image:OldBarney.jpg
Copyvio from --(WT-en) Nick 16:07, 3 March 2008 (EST)
 * delete (WT-en) Pashley 19:33, 11 March 2008 (EDT)

Outcome: Deleted --(WT-en) Nick 04:43, 18 March 2008 (EDT)