text:
Slow-cooking dinosaur eggs may have contributed to extinction, say scientists

January 4, 2017

A joint research team from the, , and announced on Monday that the eggs of non- dinosaurs such as the  took as long as six months to hatch, far longer than had previously been believed.

Bird eggs incubate for 11 to 85 days, about half the time of most other egg-laying vertebrates. Scientists had thought dinosaur eggs were more like those of modern birds than modern reptiles, but this long hatch time is far more reminiscent of than magpie.

The scientists reached this conclusion by comparing CT scans of the teeth of dinosaur embryos of two different species, the ', which had eggs weighing under 200 s, and ', a type of duck-billed dinosaur that had eggs twenty times that size. They observed the, patterns that form in teeth as they grow, to determine how long the overall developmental process was taking. "They're kind of like tree rings, but they're put down daily," said Florida State University co-author Gregory Erickson. "And so we could literally count them to see how long each dinosaur had been developing." They found the Protoceratops embryo was about three months old and the Hypacrosaurus about six months. According to the research team, this may be one reason why dinosaurs did not recover after the event 65 million years ago. Both the eggs and any parents guarding them would have drawn the attention of predators and been unable to flee floods or other problems. Guardians might not have been able to move far to find food. This, researchers say, would have put dinosaurs at a disadvantage over animals with quicker-hatching eggs and their mammalian competitors.

Natural History Museum Curator and study co-author Mark Norell cites advances in as the reason why this study is being published today: "We know very little about dinosaur embryology, yet it relates to so many aspects of development, life history, and evolution, [b]ut with the help of advanced tools like  and high-resolution, we're making discoveries that we couldn't have imagined 20 years ago." The research team plans to study more fossilized dinosaur embryo skeletons to confirm their findings. Specifically, the current study did not include the skeleton of a or any other dinosaur considered closely related to birds.


text:
Talk:Slow-cooking dinosaur eggs may have contributed to extinction, say scientists

Reviewer, I have added notes regarding which source supplied which fact in the Wikicode. I recommend reading the PNAS abstract first because it's so short and contains many of the same facts as the longer writeups cited here. Darkfrog24 (talk) 19:21, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/


text:
Talk:Hollywood sign modified to read 'Hollyweed'

Would have liked some specifics
This article would be stronger with more specifics, like what police force the sergeant was from and whether it was a state law that is due to come into effect. Darkfrog24 (talk) 19:28, 3 January 2017 (UTC)


text: Comments:Hollywood sign modified to read 'Hollyweed'


text:
User talk:Sascha GPD

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 19:47, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sascha GPD


text:
User talk:يونس البوش

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 20:27, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:يونس البوش


text:
Talk:Israeli ex-minister Yaakov Neeman dies aged 77

Review of revision 4276098 [Passed]

 * Thanks for all your efforts lately. I'm out the door in 15mins, so I won't get to extend this as I'd hoped. I wanted to write about his policies and the interrelation with his religious life. That would have rounded out our view of Neeman as a person and added a human factor. Still, real life continues. ;) BRS  (Talk)   (Contribs) 20:47, 3 January 2017 (UTC)


text: Comments:Israeli ex-minister Yaakov Neeman dies aged 77


text:
User talk:Z3571468290

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 21:22, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Z3571468290


text:
User talk:Leozaza

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 01:32, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Leozaza


text:
User talk:KathleenSherrard

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 02:05, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:KathleenSherrard


text:
User talk:Zainshahid.84

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 02:48, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Zainshahid.84


text:
User talk:BhimrajBahadur

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 04:02, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:BhimrajBahadur


text:
User talk:Aforb

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 05:27, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Aforb


text:
User talk:Bangladeshnewsman

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 05:39, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bangladeshnewsman


text:
User talk:Aforc

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 06:12, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Aforc


text:
User talk:Leechinsouter

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 06:35, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Leechinsouter


text:
User talk:Herbalista.co

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 06:48, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Herbalista.co


text:
User talk:Jumani badal

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 07:15, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jumani badal


text:
User talk:Jaroslava.dollerova

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 07:37, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jaroslava.dollerova


text:
User talk:Summer10

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 08:13, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Summer10


text:
User talk:The717Lover

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 08:18, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:The717Lover


text:
User talk:Rufus Iliya

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 08:18, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rufus Iliya


text:
User talk:John wangai 4476

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 10:07, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

== ABOGETA EAST WARD POLLS AS OF 1st October-1st January 2017: MEMBER OR COUNTY ASSEMBLY.(MCA) 1)Kaborio kaborio 47% 2)Mwirigi karinga 29% 3)Christine Kinya 12% 4)Harun Thuranira 7 % 5)Kirimi nkonge 3% 6)others 2%   ©Ispos Synovate ==

ABOGETA EAST WARD RACE 2017 John wangai 4476 (talk) 10:08, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:John wangai 4476


text:
User talk:Momozono Nanami

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 10:15, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Momozono Nanami


text:
User talk:SOSSOU Ulrich Immaculé Christel

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 11:15, 4 January 2017 (UTC)


text:
User talk:Sonyxu

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 11:41, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sonyxu


text:
User talk:Uhlem

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 11:50, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Uhlem


text:
User talk:John "Hannibal" Smith

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 11:52, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:John "Hannibal" Smith


text:
User talk:Rdarovare

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 12:53, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rdarovare


text:
User talk:Fecifer

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 13:14, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Fecifer


text:
User talk:Gdusbabek

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 14:41, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gdusbabek


text:
User talk:AllanVolt

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 14:49, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:AllanVolt


text:
User talk:Kugeekpotet

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 16:47, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kugeekpotet


text:
User talk:Write.snap.create

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 16:49, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Write.snap.create


text:
User talk:Inácio André

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 16:59, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Inácio André


text:
User talk:SpaceGuy32

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 17:13, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:SpaceGuy32


text:
User talk:Steakitup

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 17:29, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Steakitup


text: Comments:Slow-cooking dinosaur eggs may have contributed to extinction, say scientists


text:
User talk:Tfesta

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 17:46, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tfesta


text:
User talk:Michael7198

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 17:52, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Michael7198


text: Category:University of Calgary

title: Category:University of Calgary


text:
User talk:The Great Meme

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 19:22, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:The Great Meme


text:
User talk:NabeelAmin

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 19:24, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:NabeelAmin


text:
User talk:Fifina Koskina

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 19:35, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Fifina Koskina


text:
User talk:CCdongy322

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 20:13, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:CCdongy322


text:
User talk:JohnBettsJr

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 20:53, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:JohnBettsJr


text:
User talk:JozefWuli

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 22:25, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:JozefWuli


text:
User talk:Chaima lovely

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 23:01, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Chaima lovely


text: Talk:At least 56 killed in Brazil prison riot


text: Comments:At least 56 killed in Brazil prison riot


text:
User talk:Gktech716uk london

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 02:25, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gktech716uk london


text:
User talk:MSKBROS

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 02:31, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:MSKBROS


text:
User talk:Quacking goose

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 02:52, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Quacking goose


text:
User talk:Sherimgeorge

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 04:41, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sherimgeorge


text:
User talk:Marlenedugan

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 04:58, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Advertising
We don't host advertising, hence the two pages you created have been deleted.

There's a compact overview of what we do here at WN:PILLARS. WN:WRITE is a tutorial on writing a first article. --Pi zero (talk) 13:40, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

No verbatim press releases
Content on Wikinews must be licensed under the CC-BY-2.5 license, so we cannot accept verbatim press releases, nor are press releases generally accepted on Wikinews. Please do not continue to post press releases to Wikinews. Please also note that content on Wikinews should reflect a neutral point of view. Best regards, —mikemoral (talk) 06:37, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Marlenedugan


text:
User talk:Racket13

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 04:58, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Racket13


text:
User talk:Kitten88.r

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 05:24, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kitten88.r


text:
User talk:Cassini120

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 05:31, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Cassini120


text:
User talk:Rdhawan

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 06:51, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rdhawan


text:
User:Agastya/Resources

Wikinews is a news source that aims to provide news about the events happening all over the world. Though technology had brought the world closer, it is still vast. Wikinews is available in various languages, which can be helpful if exploited properly. Writing news is not really hard unlike English assignment in the high school to write articles. Well, since we can not copy from other news source directly until their content is available in a Creative Commons license compatible with the one used on this project, we can indeed take help of the sister projects. For those who are bilingual, it is easy and time saving to write a news article from, let's say Italian Wikinews about an event that happened in Turin than to write it from scratch.

There are pros and cons. An article about Spanish election is likely to be covered in depth (or at least something) on es.wikinews. But since Español is not limited to Spain, in fact, spread in the Latin countries minus Brazil and parts of the US, an article about Argentine hurricane might be also be covered on es.wikinews. This is the point. There is not separate Wikinews where editors are likely to focus* about Argentina. What I mean is, most of the editors writes and tends to cover events happening in their country. Of course there are exceptions; I haven't written much about India. the trick is to discover the editors who write about a particular country and keep a watch on their edits.

I feel I have been ignorant to many regions of the world. Evidently, the events from New Zealand are not common these days even though it is an English speaking nation. Australia — I left it for the editors from Australia.

Netherlands, Greece, Austria, Sudan, South Africa, Canada, Poland... there are many countries which I never had written/published article. The other major factor is lack of knowledge of good news media from those countries.

List of news websites for knowing what's happening
This will help when I am looking for articles to write.

title: User:Agastya/Resources


text:
User talk:Thanhtung130192

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 08:53, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Thanhtung130192


text:
User talk:Eddie Mofokeng

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 09:01, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Eddie Mofokeng


text:
User:John "Hannibal" Smith

Welcome
You can call me "Hannibal".

I normally edit on Wikipedia, but I'm becoming more active on a variety of other Wikimedia projects.

I'll add more info here soon.

Until then, you can visit my page on Wikipedia: John "Hannibal" Smith

title: User:John "Hannibal" Smith


text:
User talk:Absudar

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 09:41, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Absudar


text:
User talk:AJTK

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 10:19, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:AJTK


text:
User talk:Stl175

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 10:57, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Stl175


text:
User talk:Fanofbfolders

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 11:49, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Fanofbfolders


text:
User talk:Rieser Franz

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 12:22, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rieser Franz


text:
User talk:CalvinNwr3043

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 12:23, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:CalvinNwr3043


text:
User talk:Eartjo

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 12:56, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Eartjo


text:
U.S. Congress confirms electoral college vote for Trump presidency

January 9, 2017

On Friday, the U.S. Congress completed the official counting of the, confirming 's pending U.S. presidency under their own authority. In most years, this is a formality, but amid concerns about Trump's losing the popular vote by a considerable margin,, and allegations that some of the presidential electors who supported Trump may have been ineligible to serve, more eyes than usual have followed the confirmation process. The final count was 304 votes for Trump and 227 for, with a distant third at 3. The U.S. Constitution allows Congress to overrule the electoral college by rejecting invalid votes so long as the objections are made by at least one Representative and at least one Senator and, earlier this week, Representative, and six other House Democrats attempted to get it to do just that. Representative Lee has argued that was a serious matter in her home state of Texas. While the more reserved told  he would only get involved in the face of "evidence of technological tampering, ballot stuffing or the illegal purging of people from the rolls or exclusion of voters from the polls." However, because these representatives were not able to recruit even one senator to join them, the objections were ruled.

The organization Americans Take Action also claimed that roughly fifty presidential electors who supported Trump were ineligible to serve because they lived outside the districts they represented or held other government jobs. Although they did not claim that the voters in those districts did not actually cast for Trump or that the outcome would have been different with legitimate electors, eliminating those fifty votes would have put Trump below the 270 threshold that he would need to win. At that point, the Senate and House of Representatives would have chosen a president from among the three candidates who received the most electoral votes: Trump, Clinton and Powell. Both houses of congress currently have majorities.

In the United States, the president is not elected through a direct. Rather, each U.S. state is given one for each of its senators and representatives. In most states, whoever wins the popular vote within that state is slated to receive all of that state's electoral votes. Complicating this process is the fact that while tradition dictates that electors must vote their constituencies, only 28 U.S. states have laws requiring them to do so, and no elector who has broken those laws has ever been prosecuted. This year, there were seven, with two of Trump's electors and five of Hilary Clinton's voting their own consciences. There were protesters present in the gallery as the votes were counted. Three of them were removed by security, with one man shouting "One person, one vote!"

Customarily, the votes are read out loud in alphabetical order by state name. In U.S. history, objections to electoral votes have been rare and have been overruled by the rest of Congress.

The presidency has gone to someone who lost the popular vote but won the electoral vote five times in U.S. history, most recently to and.


text:
User talk:Margadeona

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 13:58, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Margadeona


text:
User talk:Galanmyers

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 14:38, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Galanmyers


text:
User talk:MichaelaChartres

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 15:43, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:MichaelaChartres


text:
User talk:Axeleriksson0

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 15:52, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Axeleriksson0


text:
User talk:Matthew dvorak

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 15:53, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Matthew dvorak


text:
User talk:Dongrasgym2020

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 16:26, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dongrasgym2020


text:
User talk:Monklol

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 17:04, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Monklol


text: Comments:Australian DFAT director knew of trucking company involved in alleged Iraqi kickbacks


text:
User talk:Jason Justin Smith John

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 18:02, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jason Justin Smith John


text:
User talk:Mélioratif

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 19:21, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mélioratif


text:
Wikinews:Dialog/do/test/sequence/preview

This test shows that buttons are de-sequenced when they occur in a preview element.

Parameters
Preview:


text:
User talk:Ivâniio Lémos

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 19:42, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ivâniio Lémos


text:
User talk:Dbzfan224

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 19:44, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dbzfan224


text: User:Rasztás Dzsimi

title: User:Rasztás Dzsimi


text:
User talk:Samaritânio khalifi

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 20:51, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Samaritânio khalifi


text:
User talk:Debonora

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 22:14, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Debonora


text:
User talk:Odain Howell

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 22:27, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Odain Howell


text:
User talk:SethLor

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 23:24, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:SethLor


text:
User talk:ENRIQUEMARCIANORUIZPICAZO

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 00:18, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:ENRIQUEMARCIANORUIZPICAZO


text:
User talk:83.60.153.138

French
Please see French Wikinews. We only take English news here. --Gryllida 00:41, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

 * Portugal Wikinews. --Gryllida 00:50, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Welcome
--Gryllida 00:41, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:83.60.153.138


text:
User talk:KevLeMalade

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 02:55, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:KevLeMalade


text:
User talk:Tutume1999

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 03:24, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tutume1999


text:
User talk:MEGASPLINGS

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 04:14, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:MEGASPLINGS


text:
User talk:Kalebsanders007

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 04:54, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kalebsanders007


text:
User talk:Editer9287

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 06:17, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Editer9287


text:
User talk:Thebaonguyen

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 08:40, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Thebaonguyen


text:
User talk:احمد٥٥٥

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 08:53, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:احمد٥٥٥


text:
User talk:Yashbohra92

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 09:04, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Yashbohra92


text:
User talk:Digicommsols

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 09:06, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Digicommsols


text:
User talk:BrColes1001

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 09:35, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:BrColes1001


text:
User talk:Laurdecl

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 09:51, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Laurdecl


text:
Indian actor Om Puri dies

January 6, 2017

Indian film actor died this morning of heart failure at his Mumbai home, according to reports. He was 66.

Born in in 1950, Puri trained at the. He starred in both and conventional movies, making his début in  in 1976. He gained national prominence in the 1980s and 1990s. Internationally, he starred in British, Hollywood, and Pakistani projects.

Two weeks ago Puri was looking back on his career on Twitter. "I have no regrets at all. I have done quite well for myself. I didn't have a conventional face, but I have done well, and I am proud of it." Honours include the National Film Award for Best Actor in 1982, the in 1990, and an honorary  award in 2004.

His wife Nandita and son Ishaan survive him. Tributes have come from colleagues in the film industry, and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Friend Ananth Mahadevan, an actor and director, called the death "a personal loss and a loss to cinema because he was truly India's international star."

title: Indian actor Om Puri dies


text:
User talk:Aexoxea

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 12:57, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Aexoxea


text: Talk:Indian actor Om Puri dies

title: Talk:Indian actor Om Puri dies


text: Comments:Indian actor Om Puri dies

title: Comments:Indian actor Om Puri dies


text:
User talk:Moïse Biaya

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 15:14, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Moïse Biaya


text:
User talk:Johny5000

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 18:29, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Johny5000


text:
User talk:بن مرزوق رشيد

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 18:46, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:بن مرزوق رشيد


text:
User talk:Eightheads

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 19:33, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Eightheads


text:
User talk:RAyyakkannu (WMF)

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 19:38, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:RAyyakkannu (WMF)


text: Template:Dialog/rm subst

title: Template:Dialog/rm subst


text:
Talk:U.S. Congress confirms electoral college vote for Trump presidency

I have embedded notes regarding which source supplied which facts in the source code. Darkfrog24 (talk) 21:11, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

...and to get downright technical:
This is the phrase that caused me to glitch: 'This is a common slogan among Americans who believe that the electoral college system should be replaced.' --Bddpaux (talk) 16:40, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I'll see if I can run down something more explicit, but in the meantime, out it comes. Darkfrog24 (talk) 16:50, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I admit I'm worried about this article. Bddpaux, with all the stuff that goes on in xyr life, might well not have time to get back to this today; I'm having trouble getting in reviews myself atm and might well not get to it today; and it's at the outer end of the range for possible freshness. :-S  --Pi zero (talk) 17:55, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Review of revision 4277600 [Passed]

 * I didn't want to complain while it was still under review, but the last time I wrote an article about the U.S. electoral college I got a comment to make sure I explained a bit about it in the future. International audiences and all that.
 * In your opinion, did the in-Wikicode notes about which source supplied which fact help the review process or did it just get in the way? I share Pi zero's concerns about freshness (and about people having real lives and other hobbies that prevent them from being constantly on the spot) and I'd like to do what I can to speed up the process. Darkfrog24 (talk) 22:22, 9 January 2017 (UTC)


text:
User talk:Nathanpalmer1986

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 21:41, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nathanpalmer1986


text:
User talk:Glauriel7

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 22:02, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Glauriel7


text:
User talk:Ahmed 1998

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 22:35, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ahmed 1998


text:
User talk:Jzapata95

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 00:45, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jzapata95


text:
Template:Dialog/rm subst/doc

This template removes  and   prefixes from template calls in a raw wiki markup string.

Usage
Specify the raw wiki markup through the unnamed parameter.

Note
This is considered a dialog tool simply because dialog seems the only situation where one would manipulate raw wiki markup text.

title: Template:Dialog/rm subst/doc


text:
User talk:MR MINHAZ

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 01:12, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:MR MINHAZ


text:
User talk:Massimiliano Ricciardi

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 01:27, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Massimiliano Ricciardi


text:
User talk:MarcMarkMarc

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 03:17, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:MarcMarkMarc


text:
User talk:Prettyecho

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 04:01, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Prettyecho


text:
Thread:Comments:Last Ottoman dies, aged 91/Turks were forced to live under Ottoman yoke for more than 600 years.

Turks were forced to live under Ottoman yoke for more than 600 years.

Ottoman empire was never a democratically elected representative of Turkish nation or any nation at all. Turks were forced to live under Ottoman yoke for about 628 years.

Ottoman Empire was an extreme Islamist, Jihadist system of oppression based on conquest and plunder. Its sole purpose was to conquer, plunder and establish Islamist Sharia law. It had no banking system or a viable, contemporary economy, industry, science or technology. It had no nationality.

It was in stone-age and primitive. Every Ottoman official low or high was a person of non-Turkish origins recruited by force by its devshirme system from among its non-Turkish Christian subjects. Every member of the Ottoman dynasty was a child of slave Christian concubines of non-Turkish background. It had no desire to reform itself. It oppressed the Turks under its yoke the most. Because Ottoman dynasty was very much afraid of its Turkish subjects thinking if given chances Turks would take over Ottoman state.

It kept the Turks under its yoke totally powerless economically, politically, socially and every other possible way just to prevent them from rebelling and toppling its rule because Ottoman dynasty established its rule on the ruins of many Turkish states and principalities in Anatolia with very bloody and brutal wars. As if that was not enough, Ottoman Empire made the whole Christian and Moslem-Arab Worlds the staunch enemies of the Turks under its yoke.

It kept the Turks in the stone-age darkness; kept all the advancements in science, technology and fine arts away from Turks as Europe went through an enlightenment period and made enormous advances. Ottoman system of oppression declared every contemporary innovation and advancement in science, technology and fine arts as a major Islamist sin until its very last day.

In spite of tremendous odds (internal and external), it is an absolute miracle that Turks as a nation survived, won their independence and established their Democratic Republic of Turkiye.

So, why blame the Turks, who were only a subjugated nation under the yoke of Ottoman system of oppression which was a mixture of Greeks, Armenians, other Ottoman Christian subjects of non-Turkish origins (a collection of devshirmes including its bastard sultan), for the sins of Ottomans ????


text:
User talk:Andy1111no-phi

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 05:13, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Andy1111no-phi


text:
Fort Lauderdale Airport shooting suspect appears in court

January 12, 2017

Esteban Ruiz Santiago, 26, appeared in federal court in Fort Lauderdale,, Florida this Monday. Santiago stands accused of a shooting at on Friday at 12:55 p.m. local time (1755 ) at the lower level baggage claim area in Terminal 2 of the airport. The incident killed five people and injured six, with roughly another 40 people injured in the crowd while hastily evacuating from the scene.  { "type": "FeatureCollection", "features": [ {     "type": "Feature", "properties": {}, "geometry": { "type": "Point", "coordinates": [ -80.14336466789246,         26.073063173477763        ]      }    }  ] } Police drove Santiago from the Broward County main jail to the court building in the morning. At the hearing, Santiago attended handcuffed and also cuffed at the ankles, guarded by at least eight police officers. The Magistrate, Judge Alicia Valle, questioned Santiago on his finances. The prosecutor also sought a detention order for public safety and. The hearing took about 20 minutes. The Judge ordered Santiago a, and set a detention hearing for January 17, and the hearing for January 23. After the hearing, the police returned Santiago to the Broward County main jail.

At the hearing, Santiago had admitted to earning US$2,100 a month as a security guard in Alaska, while only having about US$10 of savings in a bank, and no other property. The Judge also informed Santiago of the penalties that may be imposed on him in the case he was convicted.

On Friday, authorities said, Santiago arrived from, Alaska with only one baggage item — a suitcase with an unloaded semi-automatic handgun. Upon arriving at the airport, he picked up the suitcase at the baggage claim carousel and loaded it in a nearby bathroom. Then he walked out and started shooting people, at random according to a witness. People started to run and hide, and Santiago continued to shoot. Then Santiago stopped shooting, witnesses claiming he ran out of ammunition. The police arrested him. He did not resist the arrest.

According to officials, Santiago received a mental health evaluation in November, after he traveled to an FBI office and walked in alleging his head was controlled by the government and he heard voices urging him to watch ISIS propaganda. At the time of that incident he left his infant son and a gun in a car, and the infant was given to mother's care. His gun was seized at the time of that incident, but Santiago was given it back on December 8.

Santiago traveled from Anchorage, Alaska to Minneapolis to Fort Lauderdale Airport on a Delta Airlines flight. Investigations were ongoing to determine the motivation for the incident. No evidence was found of Santiago communicating with any other individual in relation to the incident; he seemed to be acting alone. In an interview, Santiago admitted to having planned the shooting in advance when purchasing the airline ticket. According to CNN, Esteban Santiago previously belonged to the Alaska Army National Guard, including a ten-month stint in Iraq where he was given a. According to Santiago's family, his mental health issues started after his ten-month tour in Iraq, after which he began to tell them about.

All flights to and from Fort Lauderdale Airport were suspended by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) until Saturday morning, and roads in and out of the airport closed.

Santiago was born in New Jersey. He spent his childhood in Puerto Rico, an unincorporated US territory in the northeastern Caribbean Sea.

At the time of the incident, it was legal in the US to transport guns in a hard-sided and locked container by air. In Florida, it was also legal to carry a gun in an airport terminal without removing the gun from its case.


text:
User talk:Wai yan ko

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 06:56, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Wai yan ko


text:
User talk:Anonymous10101011

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 07:24, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Anonymous10101011


text:
User talk:Renamed user b26c3v8ad269q

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 08:30, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Renamed user b26c3v8ad269q


text:
User talk:Noumassoud

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 08:49, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Noumassoud


text:
User talk:TheBearEditor

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 08:57, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:TheBearEditor


text:
User talk:Charmigupta

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 10:28, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Charmigupta


text:
User talk:Nainapatel

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 11:02, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nainapatel


text:
User talk:Abdo fathi

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 11:12, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Abdo fathi


text:
User talk:Wisley30

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 12:48, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Wisley30


text:
User talk:Pixel1976

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 13:06, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Pixel1976


text:
User talk:Singerdeepak subedi

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 13:28, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Singerdeepak subedi


text:
User talk:សោម ដូរ៉េ

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 13:43, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:សោម ដូរ៉េ


text:
User talk:Ydi.ozk.usalove

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 14:34, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ydi.ozk.usalove


text:
User talk:Hardigus

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 15:11, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hardigus


text:
User talk:Kortex85

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 15:42, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kortex85


text:
User talk:PA-811

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 15:46, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:PA-811


text:
User talk:Anwar ben souira

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 16:31, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Anwar ben souira


text:
Category:User vi-3

Users in this category indicate they have skill level 3 for language Vietnamese.

title: Category:User vi-3


text:
User talk:Coucougael94

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 17:10, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Coucougael94


text:
User talk:Nidoo44

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 17:11, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nidoo44


text:
User talk:Dvpe718

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 17:16, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dvpe718


text:
User talk:Mikadosham

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 17:37, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mikadosham


text:
User talk:Skipper1931

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 18:09, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Skipper1931


text:
User talk:Keshaven millan

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 18:58, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Keshaven millan


text:
User talk:Viapicante

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 19:03, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Viapicante


text:
User talk:Abigail245

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 19:26, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Abigail245


text:
User talk:Steelthumbs

--Steelthumbs (talk) 21:34, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 20:42, 7 January 2017 (UTC) helpme

Question? --Pi zero (talk) 22:13, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi. What do you need help with? Darkfrog24 (talk) 22:45, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

 * Hi, Steelthumbs. The most usual way to reply is to edit the section where the thing you're replying to is, or the whole page if it's not in a section (as in this case); write your reply on a separate line below what you're replying to, with enough colons,   or   or   etc., at the start of the line to indent it a little more than what you're replying to; and at the end of your reply, put   which automatically expands to a signature saying who you are and when you wrote the reply.  --Pi zero (talk) 15:19, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

 * Thanks, so like this? I'm going to try and contribute to articles about Ireland or my county, or board games I'm into. Being a Wikipedia writer already looks like fun, especially with so many people and places to help me --Steelthumbs (talk) 16:12, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

 * That is the way to do it, yes. Regarding editing Wikipedia:
 * Wikipedia and Wikinews are sister projects. That is, they are both part of the wikimedia sisterhood, operated under the aegis of the Wikimedia Foundation, but they work somewhat differently.  They have some basic things in common; not just the software platform, but also some basic philosophical values — and they disagree on some philosophy, and do different tasks using different methods.  They share a commitment to the idea that ordinary people on the internet should have a voice in information-providing.  Wikipedia produces encyclopedia articles, which can be under development forever; anything anyone does to them is instantly "published", on the assumption that if a mistake is made, over time someone will spot the error and it will be fixed.  Wikinews produces news articles, which are snapshots in time; news articles aren't under development indefinitely, they have to be gotten out while they're still news and they can't be changed long after publication (that would be like revising history); and by definition news is vetted before publication, it's not news if there isn't a philosophical commitment to getting it right the first time.
 * Editing Wikipedia — and editing Wikinews — can be fun, yes. They are somewhat different experiences.  I'm not sure how to explain the difference simply.  Both projects have great people on them, and sometimes there can be friction between the people on a project; on Wikipedia there are a lot of people, whereas Wikinews is much smaller, and so the kinds of friction between people are different.  Both projects can be technically challenging, I think, but the technical challenges are different, and with Wikinews a lot of the technical challenge is in an initial learning curve after which things get much easier.
 * --Pi zero (talk) 17:36, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Btw: there's a compact overview of what we do at Wikinews at WN:PILLARS.  There's a tutorial on writing a first article at WN:WRITE.  I also once tried to create an "article wizard", which imho ended up as a pretty good description of how to write an article but I wasn't really satisfied with it because the wiki software didn't allow it to be as interactive as I wanted it to be; that's at WN:Article wizard.  (I'm now trying to fix that limitation of the software, but it's a long-term goal.)  --Pi zero (talk) 17:42, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

 * Gah, I completely forgot this was WN and not WP, sorry. I get the notifications for these messages in Wikipedia. I'll try to write about some local news that might interest people on here when I hear about it, and thanks for all the info! --Steelthumbs (talk) 17:50, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Steelthumbs


text:
User talk:PurgingPanda

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 20:58, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:PurgingPanda


text:
User talk:Moh06

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 21:08, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Moh06


text:
User talk:IronTempleMan

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 23:18, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:IronTempleMan


text:
User talk:Michael Fonfara

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 23:59, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Michael Fonfara


text:
User talk:Lcfpitzer

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 00:02, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lcfpitzer


text:
User talk:Zaw di naung

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 00:07, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Zaw di naung


text:
User talk:Groundreport15

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 00:15, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Groundreport15


text:
User:Groundreport15

What is An Emotional Support Animal? As indicated by the National Service Animal Registry, "an Emotional Support Animal (ESA) is an animal that, by its extremely nearness, mitigates the emotional or mental manifestations connected with a handler's condition or confusion." Just by being available and detecting the states of mind they are in—things most animals can manage with no unique preparing—these animals relieve their proprietor's emotional bombshells. They go about as a steady companion and buddy to their proprietors and, eventually, help them adapt to their emotional issues, which implies a less troublesome time adapting to everyday issues. This additionally implies the animal does not need to experience an indistinguishable measure of preparing from a "working" administration animal. An ESA is basically there to quiet you in uneasiness inciting circumstances. An Emotional Support Animal can't go Everywhere Much the same as a general administration animal, an Emotional Support Animal letter is secured under the Americans with Disabilities Act. In any case, in light of the fact that the requirement for an ESA is not the same as an undeniable administration dog who has been prepared for quite a long time or years, an ESA is not given precisely the same an administration animal is given. You can take your ESA to fly in the lodge of an air ship and you can fit the bill for no-pet lodging with your ESA, however your ESA is not permitted in non-pet benevolent: Motels Eateries Taxis Transports Markets Other exclusive organizations Step by step instructions to get an Emotional Support Animal Letter In spite of the fact that having your dog, feline, or guinea pig on a flight with you may seem like an awesome thought, it is not a legitimization for getting an ESA letter without the requirement for support. The ESA program in the United States is as of now under substantial investigation for permitting dogs in spots where they won't not be required. For instance, a man with an ESA letter may attempt and persuade an eatery proprietor to give his or her dog into an eatery a chance to despite the fact that ESAs are not permitted in those territories. Besides, individuals with sensitivities who are likewise on planes with ESAs once in a while disagree with an ESA on a plane, bringing on additional discontent. Before getting an ESA, talk about your alternatives with your specialist or advisor. In the event that an ESA is not completely fundamental, it would be better not to inspire one to keep the respectability of the ESA people group alive. On the other hand, on the off chance that you require extra help for your uneasiness, a PSA may be a superior alternative.

title: User:Groundreport15


text:
User talk:Cosgood1969

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 00:42, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Cosgood1969


text:
User talk:محمد تمير

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 01:14, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:محمد تمير


text:
User:Dan6hell66/huggle3.css

// This is a configuration of huggle, do not change it unless you know what you do. enable:true // Last version of huggle that wrote into this configuration file (sanity check) version:3.1.22 build: 2938 3.1.22

speedy-message-title:Speedy deleted report-summary:Reporting $1 prod-message-summary:Notification: Proposed deletion of $1 auto-advance:false auto-whitelist:true username-listed:true admin:true patrol-speedy:true confirm-multiple:false confirm-talk:true confirm-self-revert:true confirm-whitelist:true default-summary:Reverted edits by $1 (talk) to last revision by $2 // This option will change the behaviour of automatic resolution, be carefull revert-auto-multiple-edits:true automatically-resolve-conflicts:true software-rollback:false HistoryLoad:true OnNext:1 DeleteEditsAfterRevert:true SkipToLastEdit:false PreferredProvider:2 RemoveOldestQueueEdits:false TruncateEdits:false TalkpageFreshness:20 RemoveAfterTrustedEdit:true // Get original creator of every page so that you can G7 instead of reverting the page RetrieveFounder:false DisplayTitle:false // Periodically check if you received new messages and display a notification box if you get them CheckTP:false ManualWarning:false SummaryMode:0 AutomaticReports:false // HAN HAN_Html:false HAN_DisplayUserTalk:true HAN_DisplayBots:true HAN_DisplayUser:true Watchlist:watch // Whether edits made by same user should be grouped up together in page AutomaticallyGroup:false QueueID:default // queues queues:

title: User:Dan6hell66/huggle3.css


text:
User talk:MichaelSWarner

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 02:19, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:MichaelSWarner


text:
User talk:Maike Bernardo Tchessy

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 06:45, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Maike Bernardo Tchessy


text:
User talk:Liv0800

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 07:09, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Liv0800


text:
User talk:Almicky

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 07:10, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Almicky


text:
User talk:Kram relgnaps

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 07:40, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kram relgnaps


text:
User talk:Biodunblack

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 10:38, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Biodunblack


text:
User talk:JosuaVistad

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 11:45, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:JosuaVistad


text:
User talk:Iqperson

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 13:01, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Iqperson


text:
User talk:KarlKori

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 13:48, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:KarlKori


text:
User talk:Lilisita1991

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 14:01, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lilisita1991


text:
User talk:鬼图

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 14:04, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:鬼图


text:
User talk:TheresSomethingAboutSophie

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 14:13, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:TheresSomethingAboutSophie


text:
User talk:Danyidriss

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 14:29, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Danyidriss


text:
User talk:أيوب أيوب

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 14:36, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:أيوب أيوب


text:
User talk:Takudzwa brendon Dube

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 15:01, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Takudzwa brendon Dube


text:
User talk:NumismaticJunk

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 15:10, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:NumismaticJunk


text:
User talk:Triggatrey

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 15:26, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Triggatrey


text:
User talk:Darkahsoka

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 16:35, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Darkahsoka


text:
User talk:Wenlie

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 16:40, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Wenlie


text:
User talk:Phulloshiite

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 16:41, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Phulloshiite


text:
Former Irani president Rafsanjani dies, aged 82

January 9, 2017

Yesterday, Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, president of Iran from 1989 to 1997, died in hospital in Tehran after a heart attack, Iran's state television reported. He was 82 years old. Born in 1934, Rafsanjani studied in. He was one of the leaders of the in Iran which overthrew the  to make Iran a religious republic. He was the first to hold, for nine years, the speakership of the post-revolution Iranian parliament. Rafsanjani was also appointed top representative of supreme leader on the supreme defense council, effectively Iran's military commander-in-chief in 1988 for the end of the.

The year after the end of Iran-Iraq war, Rafsanjani became president and led the country in post-war reformation and improving relations with other. Rafsanjani was elected for a second term and served as president till 1997. In 2005, Rafsanjani participated in the presidential election, but lost to Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

Rafsanjani joined with the reformers in 2009 when hardliner Ahmadinejad was re-elected as the president. The Guardian Council blocked his candidature for the presidency in 2013, citing his age. Rafsanjani later supported moderate Hassan Rouhani, who won the 2013 election. Rouhani is to re-run in May of this year.

Rafsanjani's burial is scheduled for Tuesday.


text:
User talk:Ucnobi01

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 17:28, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ucnobi01


text:
User talk:Kickboxer2017

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 17:41, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kickboxer2017


text:
User talk:Bartoloisgodofitaly

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 18:07, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bartoloisgodofitaly


text:
User talk:Quaçom

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 18:10, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Quaçom


text:
User talk:MarquitaMatthew

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 18:42, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:MarquitaMatthew


text:
User talk:DB51

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 18:53, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:DB51


text:
User talk:Julia18O711

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 19:14, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Julia18O711


text:
User talk:Jp.dharmo

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 19:40, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jp.dharmo


text:
User talk:Quinguangua

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 20:19, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Quinguangua


text:
User talk:Xanderale54

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 20:43, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Xanderale54


text:
User talk:Tarkiss2000

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 20:46, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tarkiss2000


text:
Talk:Former Irani president Rafsanjani dies, aged 82

What was the context of the quote "I don't think the country could have been run worse"? Was it a response to his losing the candidacy in 2013? The whole fourth paragraph jumps around and it's not clear how the ideas are connected to each other. Darkfrog24 (talk) 21:05, 8 January 2017 (UTC)


text:
User talk:LeonardoHerrmann

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 21:20, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:LeonardoHerrmann


text:
User talk:Iman Lopez

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 21:45, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Iman Lopez


text:
User talk:3prive

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 21:50, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:3prive


text:
User talk:Pauciloquence

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 22:29, 8 January 2017 (UTC) Thanks Pauciloquence (talk) 22:30, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Pauciloquence


text:
User talk:J F M 28

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 23:05, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:J F M 28


text:
User talk:Charradi mouad

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 23:20, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Charradi mouad


text:
User talk:Đorđe Šukalo

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 23:46, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Đorđe Šukalo


text:
User talk:Jazz-philo

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 23:46, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jazz-philo


text:
Talk:Fort Lauderdale Airport shooting suspect appears in court

Review of revision 4277305 [Not ready]
Note: I reviewed by reading the first two English-language sources. If some of the information I had failed to find is in the Spanish sources, please provide the relevant paragraphs (you may or may not translate them; if you don't, I would attempt machine translation). --Svetlana Tkachenko / Gryllida 23:54, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi Gryllida, thanks for the review, evidently the Spanish sources are the ones that answer most of those questions, besides the inclusion of certain data that the sources in English do not indicate or that are omitted. Generally the reviewers who are not able to understand Spanish, can not extract that information. Regarding the FAA, the link to Wikipedia indicates the meaning of the acronyms. I would correct those problems, but I doubt that it can happen again given the time that happened without being reviewed and the lost potential of periodistic interest. Alvaro Molina.png Alvaro Molina  (Let's Talk ) 00:17, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I have tried to address most of the concerns, however, information indicating for example that the individual recharged the gun in the airport bathroom or the exclusive use of the gun for the shooting is only indicated in the Spanish sources. I would look for sources in English to clarify these points, but it requires quite a bit of time by means of the automatic translation to search for which phrase indicates that, besides, I do not want to waste time looking for that in the end probably the article is reproved by the loss of periodistic interest. Alvaro Molina.png Alvaro Molina  (Let's Talk ) 01:08, 9 January 2017 (UTC) PD: Sorry if my English is not good.

Review of revision 4277380 [Not ready]
I have tried to apply the active voice in as many sentences as I found and they were not applying that rule. I have added the information requested and hope that the article can now be reviewed. Alvaro Molina (Let's Talk ) 04:14, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I think that if nobody is going to publish or reject the article, it would be better to erase it, I have already assumed that too many days have passed since this event and the periodic interest is already quite weak. Additionally I no longer intend to continue improving the article in case it is rejected. I also thank Gryllida for having given the time to enlarge the article, put the images and the map. Alvaro Molina.png Alvaro Molina  (Let's Talk ) 19:20, 10 January 2017 (UTC) PD: Sorry if my English is not good.
 * Gryllida has refocused the article on a new event, which resets the clock: fresnhess is now measured from the new focus, which happened on Monday. By doing that, Gryllida has disqualified herself from reviewing the article, but there are others of us here who might review it.  I've been having trouble getting to much review for the past few days, but I still have hope that I'll get to it before I sleep next (though that could be either before or after midnight UTC, so for Wikinews purposes it could be either Tuesday or Wednesday).  --Pi zero (talk) 19:51, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the clarification. I'll wait until someone checks it out. Alvaro Molina.png Alvaro Molina  (Let's Talk ) 20:21, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Interlangs
The interlangs on this are all incorrect. All three are focussed on the earlier event (the shooting), not this event (the court appearance). BRS (Talk)   (Contribs) 20:02, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
 * That was happening at Wikidata; it got linked there before the refocus. --Pi zero (talk) 21:05, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Review of revision 4278087 [Not ready]
What tool do you use to see that? I have used this tool and I do not see more than 19% of copy, which in my view does not reach a threshold of copyright infringement, at least in the various Wikinews where I edit. Alvaro Molina (Let's Talk ) 22:55, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I use dupdet for the preliminary check. --Pi zero (talk) 23:07, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I have deleted the question in question and have tried to change some words using synonyms, so that "copyright problems" should no longer be so noticeable. Alvaro Molina.png Alvaro Molina  (Let's Talk ) 23:41, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Do not copy a source text and change some synonyms to "scuff it up"; that does not work to avoid accusations of plagiary, and it does make a reviewer's task even harder by making it harder to spot the problem early. There is advice on this at WN:PILLARS.  --Pi zero (talk) 23:52, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
 * We have been with this article for more than 1 week, it no longer makes sense to wait longer, the fixes do not work and I do not see plagiarism from my point of view (I do not see complete paragraphs copied or any of that, just a few sentences). I'll mark it for deletion and end of story. Alvaro Molina.png Alvaro Molina  (Let's Talk ) 23:58, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
 * You aren't the sole author, so you don't have standing to request speedy deletion. As noted, it's not about the event on Friday anymore.  We have a mechanism for disposing of an article that fails to achieve publication, which happens naturally without a need to accelerate the process.  --Pi zero (talk) 00:22, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
 * So better to take over another, in my view there is no plagiarism, the copies consist only of small sentences and also are not more than 10 (something that does not even reach a violation). A violation is a complete copy of one or more paragraphs (or long sentences that do not consist of a dialogue or response to an interview). For me this article is good in your state, I'd rather put it aside and focus on other articles that are more likely. Alvaro Molina.png Alvaro Molina  (Let's Talk ) 00:41, 12 January 2017 (UTC) PD: Sorry if my English is not good.
 * My intent was simply to let you know, primarily for future reference, that modifying a source passage by substituting in synonyms is not something an en.wn writer should be doing. I realize it's more difficult for someone with less English fluency.  There is some advice, very compactly expressed, at WN:PILLARS (that's pillar number five out of seven).  There is also some discussion of this issue at WN:Plagiarism.  --Pi zero (talk) 00:51, 12 January 2017 (UTC)


text:
User talk:第一直觉教育

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 02:42, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:第一直觉教育


text: Comments:Former Irani president Rafsanjani dies, aged 82


text:
User talk:Longnecker62

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 03:24, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Longnecker62


text:
User talk:Jillur24

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 03:36, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jillur24


text:
User talk:WP Sarika

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 05:43, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:WP Sarika


text:
User talk:GC707

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 08:00, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:GC707


text:
User talk:Chou Xx

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 08:27, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Chou Xx


text:
User talk:KerylLem

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 09:09, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:KerylLem


text:
User talk:Shan2goku

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 09:33, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Shan2goku


text:
User talk:Kumud70

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 09:35, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kumud70


text:
Thread:Comments:Slow-cooking dinosaur eggs may have contributed to extinction, say scientists/Dinosaurs went extinct because of lesser oxygen levels due to global warming.

I know the research is impeccable in timing as it relates to why the dinosaurs didn't evolve. But as one Nat GEO documentary clearly showed with the help of animations that they went down because of lesser oxygen levels due to global warming and it worsened after the fall of asteroids from space which engulfed the world with clouds of dust and led to lesser oxygen levels. Another documentary clearly explained that the oxygen levels during the Jurassic period was approximately around 29% and after the natural calamities it went down to 18% percent which recovered back to 21% after things settled down and that's why they didn't have a chance of surviving while mammals having smaller bodies were able to evolve with 21% oxygen fine.


text:
User talk:Iaaron smith

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 11:12, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Iaaron smith


text:
User talk:Orgyn

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 11:17, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Orgyn


text:
User talk:OTAVIO.SANTOS

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 11:53, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:OTAVIO.SANTOS


text:
User talk:Kushqueen

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 13:35, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kushqueen


text:
User talk:Abdul16Majed

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 13:37, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Abdul16Majed


text:
User talk:Uncle bunny

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 13:49, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Uncle bunny


text:
User talk:SASKE KUN

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 14:26, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:SASKE KUN


text:
User talk:23jh2j4f

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 14:48, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:23jh2j4f


text:
User talk:Akshayjadhav11

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 15:30, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Akshayjadhav11


text:
Thread:Comments:Slow-cooking dinosaur eggs may have contributed to extinction, say scientists/Dinosaurs went extinct because of lesser oxygen levels due to global warming./reply

These theories are not mutually exclusive.


text:
User talk:Alcastaro

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 15:48, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Alcastaro


text:
User talk:Hongjungwook

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 17:12, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hongjungwook


text:
User talk:KaiserDog21

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 17:27, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:KaiserDog21


text:
User talk:Recon9029

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 17:49, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Recon9029


text:
User talk:Kari kozi

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 17:50, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kari kozi


text:
User talk:Emanuel Torres Manuel

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 17:54, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Emanuel Torres Manuel


text:
User talk:Mfadlyhafid

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 17:59, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Re: Hasanuddin Scientific Fair
Hi Mfadlyhafid,

Thanks for the article. Please see the links in the welcome template for some key ideas about how we write news here, and see review comments. (We do article preparation for future events, and I've tagged yours with Category:Prepared stories; but these only get submitted by the time the event has started.)

Are you planning to participate in the event? There could be some room for original reporting, if you take notes of what happened and perhaps take photos. I recall at large events it is useful to have at least two reporters, one reporter taking notes and another taking pictures.

--Svetlana Tkachenko / Gryllida (talk) 20:45, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mfadlyhafid


text: File:Wikinews January 9, 2017.pdf

title: File:Wikinews January 9, 2017.pdf


text: Comments:U.S. Congress confirms electoral college vote for Trump presidency


text:
User talk:Goodideadog

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 20:10, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Goodideadog


text:
User talk:JohnAnderson6

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 22:25, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:JohnAnderson6


text:
User talk:Modernrot

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 23:39, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Modernrot


text:
User talk:Lobismariñeiro

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 01:12, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lobismariñeiro


text:
User talk:Santosh Panta Khemraj

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 01:29, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Santosh Panta Khemraj


text:
User talk:Peter Nut

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 01:32, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Peter Nut


text:
User talk:Williamlee0708

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 01:49, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Williamlee0708


text:
User talk:42.111.141.14

Welcome
Thanks for experimenting with Wikinews. Your test worked, and has now been reverted or removed. Please use Sandbox for any other tests you want to do, since testing in articles may disrupt the site and will be reverted quickly. Alvaro Molina (Let's Talk ) 02:22, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:42.111.141.14


text:
User talk:AlenaGunson1082

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 02:30, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:AlenaGunson1082


text:
User talk:Aditya Mani Tripathi

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 04:53, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Aditya Mani Tripathi


text:
User talk:Aashimishra

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 06:11, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Aashimishra


text:
User talk:Salmanland

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 08:05, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Salmanland


text:
User talk:Ioriliao

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 09:41, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ioriliao


text:
User talk:Book-The Target

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 09:58, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Book-The Target


text:
User talk:Nammavijayapur

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 10:00, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nammavijayapur


text:
User talk:PrometheasOre

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 10:12, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:PrometheasOre


text:
User talk:Bitcoinaire

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 11:28, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bitcoinaire


text:
User talk:Kianenga Diamona

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 11:52, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kianenga Diamona


text:
User talk:Steveburgess

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 12:30, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Steveburgess


text:
User talk:Dannylem75

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 12:52, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dannylem75


text:
User talk:1640maxBot

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 13:20, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:1640maxBot


text:
User talk:Tel2528

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 13:43, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tel2528


text:
User talk:MrCarpetWolf

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 14:27, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:MrCarpetWolf


text:
User talk:Alepiad

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 14:46, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Alepiad


text:
User talk:Loveios0

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 14:46, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Loveios0


text:
User talk:Sboilani

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 15:17, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sboilani


text:
User talk:Knowlogist

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 15:19, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Knowlogist


text:
User talk:趙偉宏

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 15:44, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:趙偉宏


text:
User talk:Wikipewdia jm

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 16:36, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Wikipewdia jm


text:
User talk:Gregory.L

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 16:54, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gregory.L


text:
User talk:Elmari derba

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 16:57, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Elmari derba


text:
User talk:Dominicmgm

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 17:16, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dominicmgm


text:
User talk:Irishiranianmess

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 17:35, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Irishiranianmess


text:
Roman Herzog, former German president, dies aged 82

January 11, 2017

, seventh president of Germany, who was in the office from 1994 to 1999, died yesterday in, current president confirmed. He was 82. Born on April 5, 1934 in, , Herzog studied law at. His father worked in a snuff factory. Herzog joined the (CDU) in 1970.

Herzog was appointed as 's regional chief representative in 1973 by 's governor. He served as a judge in the from 1983 to 1987. He was promoted as the Chief Justice of the federal court in 1987, serving until 1994.

Four years after Germany's re-unification, Herzog was elected as the president of the country in 1994 though he was the second choice candidate of CDU. After the election, Herzog said, "I will try my best to lead this administration in such a way that you will regret not having given me your vote".

Herzog acknowledged Germany's reformation was slow. Germany faced economic crises in the 1990s. The president said, "Pessimism has become a normal mindset in our country. Those who want to delay or prevent major reforms need to be aware that our nation will pay a high price for this."

In 1994, Herzog visited Poland on the 50th anniversary of the 1944. On August 1, 1994, he sought forgiveness from the Polish people in, saying, "I ask for your forgiveness for all that was done to you by Germany". Herzog declared January 27 to be observed as the annual day of remembrance of the victims of the holocaust. On January 27, 1945, the at  was liberated.

Herzog is credited with the improvement of Germany after the economic crises and the reformation. In one mid-90s speech he said as Germany's economy was at a standstill.

Herzog was succeeded by in 1999. Upon retirement, Herzog said, "I'm merely retiring from office and not retiring from life". In 2015, he attended the funeral of, who served as the president of Germany before Herzog succeeded him. Herzog is survived by his second wife.


text:
User talk:Sweet Diva19

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 19:35, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sweet Diva19


text:
User talk:منصور بلفاضل

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 20:23, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:منصور بلفاضل


text:
User talk:AlfMeister

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 20:54, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:AlfMeister


text:
User talk:Quitesailor

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 21:04, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Quitesailor


text:
Talk:Roman Herzog, former German president, dies aged 82

Review of revision 4277815 [Not ready]
I agree these would improve the article. However, it seems mighty harsh to dunk the article out of the review queue entirely for this. BRS (Talk)   (Contribs) 14:04, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Edit
editprotected The German (and thus English) name for Oświęcim is Auschwitz, not Austwitz. Heavy Water (talk) 16:26, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
 * ✅ --SVTCobra 12:26, 5 January 2024 (UTC)


text:
User talk:Lirio Eurico Filipe

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 21:56, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lirio Eurico Filipe


text:
User talk:Scott mcCold

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 22:01, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Welcome
Thanks for experimenting with Wikinews. Your test worked, and has now been reverted or removed. Please use Sandbox for any other tests you want to do, since testing in articles may disrupt the site and will be reverted quickly. Alvaro Molina (Let's Talk ) 22:35, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I've moved Scott mccold to User:Scott mcCold, available at the right top of the screen if you click your nick. (We reserve the main namespace for articles instead.) --Svetlana Tkachenko / Gryllida (talk) 23:25, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Scott mcCold


text:
User:Scott mcCold

I am Scott mccold I am glad to be on wikinews. Scott mcCold (talk)

title: User:Scott mcCold


text:
User talk:Eddiangelorakotoarison

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 22:26, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Eddiangelorakotoarison


text:
User talk:Zia-ur-Rehman Rehmani

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 22:35, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Zia-ur-Rehman Rehmani


text:
User talk:105.172.6.62

Welcome
Thanks for experimenting with Wikinews. Your test worked, and has now been reverted or removed. Please use Sandbox for any other tests you want to do, since testing in articles may disrupt the site and will be reverted quickly. Alvaro Molina (Let's Talk ) 00:32, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:105.172.6.62


text:
User talk:WWC

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 00:32, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:WWC


text:
User talk:Zacmar06

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 00:33, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Zacmar06


text:
U.S. President Obama's farewell address focuses on accomplishment

January 12, 2017

United States President Barack Obama gave his official farewell address on Tuesday night from in Chicago, reflecting on personal and national accomplishments. This is expected to be his last major speech before officially handing the reins to president-elect Donald Trump on January 20.

Obama's speech was wide-ranging. He thanked his family and the nation, spoke of the need for unity, noted the country's accomplishments and need for improvement in areas like education and civil rights, and spoke about the need for pride in U.S. accomplishments, citing milestones of U.S. history and of his presidency specifically. "It's why GIs gave their lives at and ; Iraq and Afghanistan – and why men and women from  to  were prepared to give theirs as well."

The president also addressed his country's troubled history with race and racism, an issue many black citizens feel he has avoided. Despite this, Chauncy Devega of Salon described the president as "a role model of calm, cool reflective black masculinity: a man utterly at home in his own skin." Obama described the concept of a U.S. "unrealistic" and particularly cited the need for reform in education and the criminal justice system and greater acceptance of scientific evidence, particularly evidence supporting action to counteract climate change.

However, publications including The Washington Post and Salon have given particular focus to another aspect of the president's address: the country's increasing political tensions and controversies involving access to news and information, both accurate and inaccurate. "We become so secure and our bubbles," said Obama, "that we start accepting only information, whether it's true or not, that fits our opinions instead of basing our opinions on the evidence that is out there," calling this trend "a third threat to our democracy."

The Washington Post characterized Obama's comment, "If every economic issue is framed as a struggle between a hard-working white middle class and an undeserving minority, then workers of all shades will be left fighting for scraps while the wealthy withdraw further into their private enclaves," as a "not-so-subtle jab" at the campaign tactics of President-elect Donald Trump. The Telegraph describes Obama's warnings about the need to protect democracy as "a thinly veiled slight to the divisive rhetoric of Donald Trump's election campaign, which included attacks on Muslims, the disabled, women and immigrants." The president went on to call on the public to "reject the first dawning of every attempt to alienate any portion of our country from the rest or to enfeeble the sacred ties that make us one America. We weaken those ties when we allow our political dialogue to become so corrosive [...] We weaken those ties when we define some of us as more American than others when we write off the whole system as inevitably corrupt and when we sit back and blame the leaders we elect without examining our own role in electing them. It falls to each of us to be those anxious, jealous guardians of our democracy."

Despite this, when the mention of Donald Trump brought boos from the crowd, Obama reiterated the importance of the long history of peaceful transfers of power from one president to the next: "No no no no no. [...] I committed to President-elect Trump that my administration would ensure the smoothest possible transition, just as President Bush did for me." However, this was not unaccompanied by a call to action. Near the end of the speech, he insisted citizens dissatisfied with elected officials should "lace up your shoes, grab a clipboard, get some signatures and run for office yourself."

Overall, the departing president's speech focused on accomplishment, echoing the "Yes we can" slogan from his 2008 campaign: "If I have told you eight years ago, that America would reverse a great recession, reboot our auto industry, and unleash the longest stretch of job creation in our history. If I had told you, that we would open up a new chapter with the Cuban people, shut down Iran's nuclear weapons program without firing a shot, take out the mastermind of 9/11[...] If I had told you that we would win a marriage equality and secure the right to health insurance for another twenty million of our fellow citizens. If I had told you all that, you might have said our sights were set a little too high. But that's what we did."

But when the crowd began shouting "Four more years! Four more years!" Obama, with a small laugh, answered, "I can't do that."


text:
User talk:Tonymke

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 02:20, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tonymke


text:
User talk:RedLionSit

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 02:52, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:RedLionSit


text:
Talk:U.S. President Obama's farewell address focuses on accomplishment

Full Transcript
Can be found at http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-pol-obama-farewell-speech-transcript-20170110-story.html
 * Thanks. The cited source for the raw text of Obama's speech is NPR.  I prefer it because it lists the words as he said them, including responses to the crowd and improvisation.  The LA Times transcript is the prepared remarks. Darkfrog24 (talk) 01:53, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Our own view
So how much editorializing do we get to do on here? Obama's speech was so wide-ranging that almost any publication could paint it in any way. The Telegraph is focusing on his warnings to protect democracy, but they could just as easily have picked his paean to American accomplishment, his faith in Millenials, etc. etc. I don't so much as want to give my own take on it as say "Hey look how all the papers are characterizing this differently/focusing on just this one part of a big speech." On the 'pedia, that would be at least borderline OR. Darkfrog24 (talk) 13:30, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Well, we do OR here occasionally. Personally, what I'd like to see is us at least touching upon all the key aspects of the speech. When doing it your way, we run into a neutrality problem; which papers do we choose? Possibly not insurmountable, but would need done with great care. I'd be interested to see what others have to say, though. BRS  (Talk)   (Contribs) 13:43, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I was expecting more diversity of reaction than there was. Salon, Telegraph and the Post all thought Obama was issuing a warning.  Anywho, I hope you like it.  I went less for punchy wording and more for flow.  If I've got a concern it might be that it's too quote-heavy. Darkfrog24 (talk) 01:55, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

"Only" vs "Biggest" superpower
I was going for snappy prose here. Here's my source, Time magazine, for referring to the U.S. as the world's "only" rather than "biggest" superpower. China is on its way but it still doesn't quite qualify. Darkfrog24 (talk) 03:50, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Review of revision 4278308 [Passed]

 * Regarding neutrality, I was going for "punchy" per review of a previous article (which in turn involved some reservations about the level of explanation about the electoral college, the lack of which had been cited as a weakness in the article before that). This is a Wikiproject and individual variation among reviewers is to be expected.  I'm watching Agastya Chandrakant struggle with getting that Telegram article past review, but if you look at their contribution history, some highly similar articles—same author, similar subject, same problems—have been approved in the past.
 * looks perfect for any article about the actual handover.
 * If it goes well, yes. Fingers crossed. Darkfrog24 (talk) 14:42, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Just because we've published articles in the past does not mean we must slavishly continue to handle their issues the same way in the future; there's room for us to learn and try to improve our practices. We don't continue to improve any given article indefinitely over time (archiving policy); but how to handle a particular issue can be an ongoing dialog over time.  Sometimes I do manage to address such developing issues in review comments, with an eye particularly to noting when something I've just done ought not be taken too much as a model going forward.  All this is related, also, to how one goes about maintaining standards without becoming bureaucratic.  --Pi zero (talk) 15:07, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
 * This is itself an article another reviewer could have a radically different view of ;) BRS  (Talk)   (Contribs) 21:33, 12 January 2017 (UTC)


text:
User talk:ဘူမိအကိုဘတို

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 03:44, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:ဘူမိအကိုဘတို


text:
User talk:Roo777

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 03:48, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Roo777


text:
User talk:JohnnieMcIlveen

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 03:49, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:JohnnieMcIlveen


text:
User talk:Bmncaper

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 04:28, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bmncaper


text:
User talk:Thedavematthewsband

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 04:34, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Thedavematthewsband


text:
User talk:Trashmancan

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 05:16, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Trashmancan


text:
User talk:Eidorb14

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 05:37, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Eidorb14


text:
User talk:Johnkossie

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 05:39, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Johnkossie


text:
User talk:Adamsondoors1

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 07:05, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Adamsondoors1


text:
User talk:Bento Catietie Xavier

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 07:33, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bento Catietie Xavier


text:
User talk:Chofeur

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 08:17, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Chofeur


text:
User talk:Imjosephliu

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 09:23, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Imjosephliu


text:
User talk:Mehata Aditya

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 09:56, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mehata Aditya


text:
User talk:Miki.kiyu

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 10:05, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Miki.kiyu


text:
User talk:Avataron

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 13:27, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Avataron


text:
User talk:Pttplayhouse4

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 13:54, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Pttplayhouse4


text:
User talk:Sagarprashant25

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 14:57, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sagarprashant25


text:
User talk:Ottawaorrell

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 16:44, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ottawaorrell


text:
User talk:48Manbot

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 17:12, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:48Manbot


text:
User talk:Jordi Matondo

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 17:16, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jordi Matondo


text:
User talk:Saif Arash

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 17:28, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Saif Arash


text:
User talk:Choose adifferentname

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 18:43, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Choose adifferentname


text:
User talk:Tackler80

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 19:06, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Tackler80


text: Comments:Roman Herzog, former German president, dies aged 82


text:
User talk:Dee tarupiwa

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 19:37, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dee tarupiwa


text:
User talk:Fernando 501

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 20:08, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Fernando 501


text:
User talk:Abubakarabolarin

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 20:15, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Abubakarabolarin


text:
Artist who changed Hollywood sign to 'Hollyweed' surrenders to authorities

January 12, 2017 On Monday, the person responsible for changing the in California to read "Hollyweed" as a new year's prank turned himself in to local authorities. 30-year-old artist Zachary Cole Fernandez surrendered himself, the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) said. According to LAPD, Fernandez went to the police station accompanied by his lawyer, where he confessed to have changed the sign and was bailed out shortly thereafter for US$1000. LAPD charged Fernandez with trespassing; earlier reports indicated vandalism charges were ruled out as he used black and white tarps to alter the letter "O" to read lowercase "e". The sign was not physically damaged.

A court hearing is scheduled for February 15. Fernandez said this act was an art project, and claimed he faces up to six months in prison if convicted. It took Fernandez two hours to alter the sign. Regarding conviction, he said, "I'm a person of integrity. If I do something wrong, I will own up to it."

Exactly 41 years ago, on the same date in 1976, then-university student Daniel Finegood modified the sign to read "Hollyweed" for an art class assignment. Finegood returned to change the sign again in 1990, spelling out "Oil War" to protest against the First Persian Gulf War. Fernandez, on Tuesday, said his act was to "bring light and positivity and happiness". He said he was inspired by Finegood's modification to the sign.

City Councilman David Ryu said in a statement. "Pranks of this nature deplete the resources of our valuable public safety personnel".

The term "weed" is an English slang term for cannabis, a banned drug in many countries. On November 9, a ballot for legalising recreational use of cannabis in California for the age group of 21 and above was passed. The law legalising recreational cannabis is due to come into effect in 2018.


text:
User talk:Wilson Elias

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 20:43, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Wilson Elias


text:
User talk:Agustinus Giyai

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 21:05, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Agustinus Giyai


text:
User talk:علیزی

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 21:07, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:علیزی


text:
User talk:Krookies

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 21:23, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Krookies


text:
User talk:Aecarol

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 21:26, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Aecarol


text:
Talk:Artist who changed Hollywood sign to 'Hollyweed' surrenders to authorities

Non English sources
The article is translated from Portuguese language and uses Portuguese sources. I have added two English sources at the end which can verify the entire article, if the reviewer decides to drop the non-English source. Agastya Chandrakant  ⚽ 🏆 🎾 🎬 🎤 📰  21:29, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

US$1000 to $1,000
Mentioning "US$" and "," can cause confusion to some readers. In the article about Yahoo!, News.com.au — which was used as a source, in the headlines mentioned $6.5billion acquisition. It was surprising since 1 billion accounts were hacked, which should have decreased the value initially decided as 4.83 billion. $6.5billion is in AUD, and they mention US$ in their article. Even the the article was about US companies, they first tell in AUD. (Of course; it is Australian company). So I think it won't cause any harm and we will be on the safer side to mention US$. Secondly, European countries like Spain has a different meaning of ",". 13.250 for them is Thirteen thousand and two fifty while 9,210 is nine point two one for them. So, I think we should drop the ",". Agastya Chandrakant  ⚽ 🏆 🎾 🎬 🎤 📰  16:06, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
 * If you feel these changes are reasonable and should be done, I recommend you make the edits to the article, thus submitting them for review. --Pi zero (talk) 17:06, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
 * (didn't actually ping me for some reason) WN:SG to my own surprise doesn't reflect a conversation I recall some years prior to the effect spelling out US, AU etc in articles where it can only be one currency was redundant. It does address the point about commas, however.
 * The other example doesn't match this, for the very reasons you describe; News.com.au has reason to be using different currencies, and is (or ought to be) clarifying them.
 * Ultimately I agree with PiZ; these aren't major points. Pinging one specific reviewer about them is only going to risk delay when the edits could just be made yourself; I am only just back online now. BRS  (Talk)   (Contribs) 21:43, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I had noticed the change while the article was under review. I did not find you on IRC so I thought to left a message here. But my internet connection was slow that time and I was able to place the message but it was late.  Agastya Chandrakant  ⚽ 🏆 🎾 🎬 🎤 📰  03:15, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Ouch. That's some nasty connection speeds. BRS  (Talk)   (Contribs) 12:44, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Last paragraph
editprotected

"On November 9, legislators voted in favor of a ballot for legalising recreational use of cannabis in California for the age group of 21 and above. The law legalising recreational cannabis is due to come into effect in 2018."

From what I understand of the law, the California Legislature itself didn't pass the law. It was passed by voter initiative, a sort of direct democracy California has which allows the electorate to submit petitions to call a referendum for particular proposals. It isn't exactly correct to say it was the legislators who passed the law. I think the law took immediate effect as well, but sales are not yet permitted. I do wish I had gotten the chance to take a picture of the sign, but oh well. —mikemoral (talk) 09:37, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Digging into the sources on the prior article, it looks like you may be right; while not said explicitly, on careful re-reading it is very strongly implied. BRS  (Talk)   (Contribs) 12:43, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * A late reply, but a quick googling shows that it was an initiative measure, so the legislators didn't have a say in the law. Ballotpedia says the possession of cannabis became immediately legal, but sales and taxation provisions of the law take effect in 2018. I'm not sure if this really requires a correction though. —mikemoral (talk) 08:33, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm marking this section, so we don't lose track of it while we're considering whether it calls for a correction. --Pi zero (talk) 13:39, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

 * Perhaps revising the text to "Voters approved a ballot proposition legalizing recreational cannabis for adults age 21 and over on November 9, but non-medical cannabis sales are not allowed until 2018" based on this information. It would more accurate, although that source would probably need to be added to the sources list. —mikemoral (talk) 00:06, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

 * This would be a correction, since it's more than 24 hours post-publish. --Pi zero (talk) 00:49, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
 * It appears to me the edit to this article at the time was sufficient to avoid a correction here, and I've (tentatively) disabled the editprotected tag above. I've proposed a correction to the earlier article.  --Pi zero (talk) 01:11, 22 January 2017 (UTC)


text:
User talk:Mohammed hidaoui

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 22:09, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mohammed hidaoui


text:
User talk:Bahi2800caid

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 22:37, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bahi2800caid


text:
User talk:Akamossad

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 23:01, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Akamossad


text:
User talk:Samy Ali Nejar

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 00:20, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Samy Ali Nejar


text:
User:Ryn78

This is the WikiNews version of the Ryn78 account on the English Wikipedia.

title: User:Ryn78


text:
User talk:DonTalley

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 02:04, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:DonTalley


text:
User talk:Datou 1996

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 03:05, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Datou 1996


text:
User talk:Wittgenstein123

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 04:51, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Wittgenstein123


text:
User talk:Zhzhzhda

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 07:15, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Zhzhzhda


text:
User talk:Gomes Pereira DrîZzy

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 08:24, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gomes Pereira DrîZzy


text:
User talk:Charmi65

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 09:13, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Charmi65


text:
User talk:Seafaf

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 09:19, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Seafaf


text:
User talk:Mctahir

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 09:39, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mctahir


text:
User talk:Miste nate

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 09:41, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Miste nate


text:
User talk:Jackyquah

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 09:43, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jackyquah


text:
User talk:Pjholm

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 11:23, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Pjholm


text: Comments:Artist who changed Hollywood sign to 'Hollyweed' surrenders to authorities


text:
User talk:Lastrik

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 12:45, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lastrik


text:
User talk:William Pelto

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 13:35, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:William Pelto


text: Comments:U.S. President Obama's farewell address focuses on accomplishment


text:
Talk:Obama's call for peaceful transfer of power borne out in smooth Trump turnover

Headline
The current headline needs changing, as it's essentially an assessment; non-neutral. The way to handle this sort of thing is to present the reader with facts and leave assessment to them. --Pi zero (talk) 15:29, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The current headline is a placeholder, more about hope than anything else. I consider it a matter of course that we would change it to reflect events after they happened, after the facts come to exist.  Might as well wait and do it just once.
 * It might be a Wikipedia holdover but it would probably be better if we didn't have to choose a title for the article before writing it. Darkfrog24 (talk) 13:38, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * A placeholder headline makes sense if one doesn't know details yet. Because a news article is written around a focal event, though, it seems one would ordinarily be able to come up with a plausible initial headline even if it is something one expects to change later as more is known.  How about "US presidency passes from Obama to Trump"?  --Pi zero (talk) 13:44, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Given that it's a story prepared in advance, one could use a very generic placeholder name like Trump takes power or somesuch, as PiZ suggests. Judge jails 'monstrous' London serial killer Stephen Port started life under the placeholder "Stephen Port trial", for example. BRS  (Talk)   (Contribs) 13:51, 13 January 2017 (UTC)


text:
User talk:Sunuwar Niraj

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 15:38, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sunuwar Niraj


text:
User talk:TheCreator176

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 15:48, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:TheCreator176


text:
User talk:Liamchozah

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 16:32, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Liamchozah


text:
User talk:Penelope86T

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 17:34, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Penelope86T


text:
User talk:CristeaCristian

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 17:38, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:CristeaCristian


text:
User talk:HausaDictionary

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 18:29, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:HausaDictionary


text:
Thread:Comments:Artist who changed Hollywood sign to 'Hollyweed' surrenders to authorities/hollywood's true identity HOLLYWEED

hollywood's true identity is HOLLYWEED


text:
Late-night vote sets Obamacare up for filibuster-free repeal

January 14, 2017

At 1:30 a.m. on Thursday morning the United States Senate voted to include the repeal of the, better known as Obamacare, as part of a budget blueprint. This procedural measure allows most of Obamacare to be repealed by a simple majority rather than the usual requirement of 60 out of the senate's 100 votes and effectively prevents the use of. "We're working with legislative leaders at this very moment to begin to craft legislation that will repeal the most corrosive elements of Obamacare — the individual mandate, the taxes, the penalties — but at the same time, moving separate legislation that will allow us to introduce the kind of reforms in American health care that'll lower the cost of health insurance without growing the size of government," said Vice President-elect.

Democratic Senator of Washington had a different view, going so far as to call this "stealing health care from Americans."

The filibuster is a last-ditch tactic in which parties opposed to a certain motion refuse to relinquish the floor until their opponents give in or compromise.

Although the 51-48 vote was mostly along party lines, some Republicans have expressed uncertainty about repealing Obamacare before a replacement system is worked out. Although president-elect Donald Trump has called for a "repeal and replace" plan, saying that a new health care system would be enacted "almost simultaneously," many in government and the press have expressed doubts about whether this would actually happen. Senator of Maine said she would like to at least see a well-constructed plan before voting and Senator  of Georgia said repealing Obamacare without replacing it was "unacceptable." These concerns were shared by members of the House of Representatives. "We need to be voting for a replacement plan at the same time that we vote for repeal," added Representative of North Carolina. Representative of New Jersey agreed, saying, "We're loading a gun here. I want to know where it's pointed before we start the process."

Anna Merlan of Jezebel and Anthony Taylor of the Associated Press dismiss Trump's timeline as "impossible" given the complicated nature of U.S. congressional workings. Senator Collins agreed, saying "I don't see any possibility of our being able to come up with a comprehensive reform bill that would replace Obamacare by the end of this month. I just don't see that as being feasible."

The Affordable Care Act, which is often cited as a key accomplishment of the, has had a mixed reputation, and many conservatives believe a market-based health care system would be more flexible and efficient and less costly, and many believe that the Affordable Care Act only passed because of Obama's later discredited pledge that no one who liked their current health plan would have to switch. Matt O'Brien of  claims a large tax cut that would result for the wealthiest 1% of citizens if Obamacare funds were not converted to other purposes, estimated at about $32,820 annually per person by the, is also a significant motive.

Republican Senators set a date of January 27 to repeal Obamacare, according to NBC News. House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy of California says legislation repealing Obamacare and replacing it could ready by late February. According to Democratic Senator Bernie Sanders, as many as 30 million people could lose their health insurance if the ACA is repealed.


text:
User talk:Bert the fish

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 20:07, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bert the fish


text:
User talk:Fireselam Arika

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 20:37, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Fireselam Arika


text:
User talk:RMLNZ

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 20:52, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:RMLNZ


text:
Talk:Late-night vote sets Obamacare up for filibuster-free repeal

I don't know if I'll use this as a source but this 2014 Slate article on why Reps don't like Obamacare is giving me some useful background. Darkfrog24 (talk) 21:09, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Review
I hope to get this out the door (assuming a smooth review) today/tonight. Sorry it's ended up neglected. Volunteer labour, eh? ;) BRS  (Talk)   (Contribs) 16:18, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Nature of the beast. And what a proud fanged creature we have unleashed upon an unsuspecting universe!  Growl out the news, my pretty!  GROWL! Darkfrog24 (talk) 23:55, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Edit
editprotected Please add this to Category:Kevin McCarthy. --Heavy Water (talk) 16:10, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

 * ✅ by SVTCobra. --Heavy Water (talk) 19:03, 4 January 2023 (UTC)


text:
User talk:Lucas Bernardo II

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 21:10, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lucas Bernardo II


text:
User talk:Rocky ride

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 21:18, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rocky ride


text:
User talk:NewEgg

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 21:31, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:NewEgg


text: Comments:Fort Lauderdale Airport shooting suspect appears in court


text:
User talk:Khalid YAWYAW

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 21:43, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

title: User talk:Khalid YAWYAW


text: Category:Joachim Gauck

title: Category:Joachim Gauck