text:
User talk:Wathiik

Speedy deletion of Capone (Chicano rapper)
deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 15:46, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Basel German
Hi Wathiik, please join our discussion on Talk:Basel German about some content you added 2 years ago ;) --Goonies (Tell me!)  16:08, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Ruthless Rap Assassins
I have nominated Ruthless Rap Assassins, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Ruthless Rap Assassins. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Guy (Help!) 20:28, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Rappers Rapp Disco Record Co.
A tag has been placed on Rappers Rapp Disco Record Co. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. — Hello, Control Hello, Tony  18:23, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of S
I have nominated S, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/S. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Spencer Divonn'io the glorious (talk) 18:05, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rhyme Syndicate

The article Rhyme Syndicate has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:MUSIC

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reconsider !  05:58, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Wathiik! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:03, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Tony G (producer) -
 * 2) Lord Finesse -
 * 3) DJ Magic Mike -

 * Also, Jonny Z, an article that you probably created, was deleted as an unreferenced biography of a living person. It was previously attributed to LA2 in the page history, but I managed to recover some earlier edits to it from the Nostalgia Wikipedia. Graham 87 08:44, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tony G (producer)

A tag has been placed on Tony G (producer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 17:29, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Continuorilasso

The article Continuorilasso has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
 * A7 -- lacks sufficient indicia of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epeefleche (talk) 05:08, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Porn Theatre Ushers

The article Porn Theatre Ushers has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable band, tagged as such for over a year. Still no references, sources, claims to notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 71.110.69.206 (talk) 01:25, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Afrika Islam

A tag has been placed on Afrika Islam requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Toddst1 (talk) 16:57, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Home Team (band)
I'm guessing this is a rap group, based on what else was added at the time.

What can you tell me about Home Team? I was adding an article on a film by that name and I looked to see what linked to that name. I cleaned up everything that didn't link to the film.— Vchimpanzee  ·  talk  ·  contributions  · 18:29, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Home Team is in fact a hip-hop crew from NY, their music was released by Miami-based Luke Records. Wathiik (talk) 15:49, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

---> http://www.discogs.com/artist/Home+Team

Speedy deletion nomination of P-27

A tag has been placed on P-27 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Killian441 (talk) 17:52, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Sa Razza for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sa Razza is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sa Razza until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 00:41, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of F

A tag has been placed on F requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. U2fan01 (talk) 00:26, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

HighGerman listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect HighGerman. Since you had some involvement with the HighGerman redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 01:17, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Aztlan Underground

The article Aztlan Underground has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. Three album entries at AllMusic and none have reviews. Same at Reverb Nation."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:13, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Aztlan Underground for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aztlan Underground is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Aztlan Underground until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:20, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Compton's Most Wanted

The article Compton's Most Wanted has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: "Two references are dead, and the other two references are from HipHopDX which is not a reliable source, and the Wikipedia page of HipHopDX was contested for Deletion in 2007 and the result was deleted. Also, most of the band members in this band are not notable as per WP:BAND"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Angus1986  TALK  09:06, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of The Dix for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Dix is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Dix until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lennart97 (talk) 19:43, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

title: User talk:Wathiik


text:
Elk (disambiguation)

The elk (Cervus canadensis) is a large antlered mammal within the deer family.

Elk may also refer to:

Wildlife

 * Eurasian elk or moose (Alces alces), the largest extant species in the deer family
 * Irish elk (Megaloceros giganteus, extinct), one of the largest deer that ever lived
 * Whooper swan or elk, a large Northern Hemisphere swan

Arts and entertainment

 * Elk (.hack), a character in the .hack alternative history franchise
 * Elk (album), 2005, by Inga Liljeström
 * Elk (Milwaukee sculpture), a 1901 public artwork
 * E L K, èlk or ELK, Australian hip hop artist on the Playback 808 label
 * Thompson Elk Fountain, an outdoor fountain in Portland, Oregon, by Roland Hinton Perry

Places

 * Ełk, a town in northeastern Poland
 * Elk, Fresno County, California
 * Elk, Mendocino County, California
 * Elk, Kansas
 * Elk, Ohio
 * Elk City, Oklahoma
 * Elk, Washington
 * Elk, West Virginia
 * Elk, Wisconsin

Technology

 * Extension Language Kit, an implementation of the Scheme programming language
 * ELK stack, a technology stack composed of Elasticsearch, Logstash, and Kibana, now called Elastic Stack
 * Acorn Electron, nicknamed "Elk", an 8-bit microcomputer produced in the 1980s by British company Acorn Computers

Transportation

 * Elk, a locomotive of the South Devon Railway Eagle class
 * Elk (steam tug), formerly operated on Puget Sound
 * Elk (sternwheeler 1857), a steamboat

Other uses

 * Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks
 * Elk (surname)
 * Elk Mountains (Colorado)
 * Elk v. Wilkins, a United States Supreme Court case

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Elk (disambiguation)


text:
User talk:StefanRybo~enwiki

test --- chyba się udał ten test !

Wikipedians/Germany is being replaced by a category
Hello! You were listed on the Wikipedians/Germany page as living in or being associated with Germany. As part of the User categorisation project, these lists are being replaced with user categories. If you would like to add yourself to the category that is replacing the page, or one of the Bundesland-based subcategories, please visit Category:Wikipedians in Germany for instructions. --Angr ( tɔk ) 15:25, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

Your old user page
Hi Stefan, I've moved your old userpage to User:StefanRybo/Old. I found it while checking some deleted contributions. Hope you don't mind. Graham 87 14:33, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called StefanRybo. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name StefanRybo~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 03:11, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 19:12, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:StefanRybo~enwiki


text:
User talk:Donpaolo

Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need any questions answered about the project then check out Help or drop me a line. Cheers! --maveric149

title: User talk:Donpaolo


text:
User talk:Hanoman

Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need any questions answered about the project then check out Help or drop me a line. Cheers! --maveric149

title: User talk:Hanoman


text:
User talk:Wheat

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Expo (framework) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Expo (framework), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Lopifalko (talk) 07:05, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Expo (framework)

Hello, Wheat. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Expo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:45, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Star Wars: Episode I – The Phantom Menace
Star Wars: Episode I – The Phantom Menace has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. – zmbro (talk) (cont) 16:57, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

title: User talk:Wheat


text:
User talk:Apswartz

Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need any questions answered about the project then check out Help or drop me a line. Cheers! --maveric149

title: User talk:Apswartz


text:
User talk:Edbn1

Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need any questions answered about the project then check out Help or drop me a line. Cheers! --maveric149

title: User talk:Edbn1


text:
User talk:Jmeadors

Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need any questions answered about the project then check out Help or drop me a line. Cheers! --maveric149

USS Liberty incident
Hi! Since you’ve recently edited the ‘Details in dispute’ section of the article USS Liberty incident, I was wondering whether you could check the attributions of positions in that section, in particular those where it is claimed (or sometimes implied) that the entire Liberty crew hold the view. I don’t know enough about the matter to make any such judgement, but (apart from the issue that some of the crew did not apparently live long enough to voice their views) I am a bit skeptical about e. g. the item on radio communications (my knowledge of naval procedure is very limited, but I imagine most crewmembers would not be standing around radio receivers most of the time). On a related note, the PDF files to which you added links look more like individual positions than collective statements, and I think this deserves proper mention. —xyzzyn 18:02, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for taking the time to write. I'll check the attributions and correct them as best as I can. It is not appropriate for me (or us) to imply that we speak for the whole crew since we are not in touch with all of them. Two of them just surfaced last month and there are many who have not been found or have not come forward.

Warmest regards,

Joe Meadors

TerrorStorm
Hi. I would like to request your opinion regarding how the liberty attack is portrayed in the online-available video TerrorStorm. Thanks. --Striver 21:50, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Don't have a copy of it and haven't seen it. When I do see it I'll let you know what I think.

Warmest regards,

Joe USS Liberty Survivor

Thank you :) You can see it for free in Google video, the article has a link to it in the "external links" section. here is a copy of the links :) Peace! --Striver 14:57, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

partial removal of content
Hi, I noticed that in some of your edits, for examples and, a large portion of content is being removed. I don't believe that you intended for this to happen. If you are using the google toolbar I believe that it might be to blame. So if you would, please consider removing the google toolbar, or checking over your own edits, in order to avoid the potential loss of content. Thank you. -- malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 14:18, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

It was, indeed, unintentional. Thanks for the advice. I have removed the Google toolbar and will see if the situation improves.

Warmest regards,

Joe USS Liberty Survivor 14:28, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks for your contributions to the USS Liberty incident article. I'm a military history buff and applaud your efforts to shed light on the attack. Majoreditor 21:47, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

 * And thanks for your kindness in taking the time to leave a note.

 * Bear in mind, according to WIKI standards there is no requirement that the article be based on facts -- merely that the contents be a reflection of what is already posted on the internet by what WIKI anonymous monitors deem to be credible and unbiased sources. USS Liberty Survivor 17:49, 20 January 2007 (UTC

Really sad
Man, this is is so incredibly sad, you have my deep sympathy. Would you be interested in E-Mailing me and talk about this issue? Thanks. --Striver - talk 20:08, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Salute to you and your shipmates!!
Joe, I salute you and your shipmates in serving your country. Your contributions to the Liberty incident are absolutely essential and well appreciated by honest editors. I encourage you to maintain vigilance on the article because there are certain disingenuous editors who would remove all your contributions.

Again, thank you for your service to our country and your valuable additions to the Liberty article. Jtpaladin 23:33, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

A Little Thank You
Thank you too, for keeping the article free of agenda and lies. I tried to "discuss" some change into the article a few years ago but failed.

I would like to see the title Name of the article changed to Attack (rather than incident) because there is no other word to describe the event.

My own belief is that the Israel's idea was to sink the USS Liberty and to then blame it on Egypt. Nmollo (talk) 18:44, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Jmeadors. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 22:26, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jmeadors