text:
Wiktionary:Votes/2010-02/Accepting the results of the Wiktionary logo vote

Accepting the results of the Wiktionary logo vote

 * Voting on: Accepting the results of the Wiktionary logo vote, and changing the English Wiktionary logo to the winning logo. See ~skalman/wikt/logo/ for some examples of how the logo looks in various situations.

 * Vote starts: 00:00, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Vote ends: 23:59, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

 * Vote created: Yair rand 22:51, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Discussion:
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] Wiktionary talk:Votes/2010-02/Accepting the results of the Wiktionary logo vote
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] '''m:Talk:Wiktionary/logo/refresh/voting

Support

 * 1) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support Rising Sun talk? contributions 21:32, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support Prince Kassad 21:43, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support —CodeCat 22:18, 28 March 2010 (UTC) I don't see why not. Besides, finally it's an actual logo!
 * 4) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support Yair rand 22:36, 28 March 2010 (UTC) I look forward to having a proper logo (and being rid of the "that's not how dictionary is pronounced" complaints. :) --Yair rand 22:36, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * 5) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support --Vahagn Petrosyan 22:56, 28 March 2010 (UTC) pleasant logo.
 * [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support —Ruakh TALK 23:07, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support EncycloPetey 02:12, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support —AugPi (t) 04:15, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support because Wiktionary must have a common logo, as all the other projects do. However, I don't like that we're voting on this here at all. The main reason this had to be taken to meta was that individual language Wiktionaries would probably choose different logos, had they voted on it individually. I had the impression we had gone into the big vote with the idea that its outcome would be binding for all Wiktionaries (and Wiktionary as a whole!) and I don't like the idea that individual sections can now just look at it as advisory and reject it now, creating the same situation we had to begin with. The Meta vote was the solution. Now we simply must accept the outcome. – Krun 07:02, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support Daniel. 07:05, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * 5) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support Jamesjiao → T ◊ C 12:13, 29 March 2010 (UTC) This is the one I voted on originallly on meta and I am glad to see it making its way here. Jamesjiao → T ◊ C 12:13, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * 6) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support < class="latinx">Ƿidsiþ 12:23, 29 March 2010 (UTC) I don't really like it, but then I don't really like the current one either. < class="latinx">Ƿidsiþ 12:23, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * 7) Ƿidsiþ, since an important function of a logo is to maintain visual identity over time, changing from one poor logo to another is worse than just sticking with one. You might consider changing your vote. —Michael Z. 2010-03-29 15:26 z
 * Nothing could be worse than sticking with what we have. We get confused complaints about it on a weekly basis. The new one is at least inoffensive. < class="latinx">Ƿidsiþ 15:57, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay. Our visual presence will attract less notice and comment. After a year and a half we have achieved inoffensiveness. Let's make our motto Obscurity by 2015! —Michael Z. 2010-03-29 19:02 z
 * 1) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Yes!! About time. I'm tired of trying to explain why we pronounce "Wiktionary" like a stuffy Brit. :D L☺g☺maniac ☃ 15:35, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support Pharamp 16:20, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support -- A LGRIF  talk  16:22, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support Conrad.Irwin 16:30, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * 5) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support I think this is the best of the batch by far. Hopefully this will finally replace the current one, though I am okay with the tiles as well. -kslays 20:45, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * 6) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support —Internoob (Disc•Cont) 01:10, 30 March 2010 (UTC) I would have preferred the tile logo, but this logo is still an improvement over the current one.
 * I am unstriking my vote on the condition that if this passes, we will use the blurred one. I still maintain that this logo is an improvement over the current one, regardless of how flawed the vote on Meta might have been. If someone has any better suggestions, I'm all ears. —Internoob (Disc•Cont) 22:55, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support -Atelaes λάλει ἐμοί 21:04, 30 March 2010 (UTC)  Regradless of which one I find preferable (which does, in fact, happen to be the one picked), I'd like to see some unification, as opposed to the current assortment.  -Atelaes λάλει ἐμοί 21:04, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support. --Thrissel 23:40, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support - it's time all Wiktionaries had the same logo, and this is the one which had majority support across all projects. Modest Genius 16:51, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
 * user hasn't any contributions here --Rising Sun talk? contributions 09:56, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support Bequw → τ 17:23, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support The spesh man 23:45, 11 April 2010 (UTC) I was originally intending on something else, but, I seemed to go more toward this logo towards the end of round 1.
 * User hasn't any contributions here --Rising Sun talk? contributions 09:57, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
 * These comments were unstricken by The spesh man. I'm not reverting him because, according to WT:V:
 * "#::* No voting policies are in effect at this time. Tentative guidelines for voters:
 * Account must predate start of vote by one week.
 * Anyone can vote, especially regulars from other language Wiktionaries.
 * One vote per person. Sockpuppet voting results in a block on all related accounts.
 * "—Internoob (Disc•Cont) 02:40, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support —Rod (A. Smith) 15:42, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support --Håkon 08:27, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support — Tanvir 03:25, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] support --Volants 12:59, 29 April 2010 (UTC). Better

Oppose

 * 1) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose Ivan Štambuk 23:20, 28 March 2010 (UTC) Voting on voting is simply absurd. I'd personally rather prefer tile logo which IMHO looks nicer, is more legible and emphasizes more the international character of this project. This vote is introducing false dichotomy, and for it to function properly one should count among the "opposing" votes all the Wiktionary regulars' votes that voted for the tile logo on meta (unless they've changed their mind in the meantime). --Ivan Štambuk 23:20, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * This isn't a vote about whether to use the book or the tiles, it's about whether the English Wiktionary should change the logo at all. "Oppose" means that you support keeping the text logo. --Yair rand 23:22, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Which is why I said it was introducing false dichotomy. If this is a vote to change from the current text logo to the AAEngelman's logo - it should be explicitly stated so in the vote proposal. It is nice that AAEngelman's logo won the meta vote (not by a great margin though), but I don't see that as relevant. It's unfair that only one logo is presented as an option. --Ivan Štambuk
 * Re: "one should count among the 'opposing' votes all the Wiktionary regulars' votes that voted for the tile logo on meta": Nonsense. I voted for the book logo, but if the tile logo had won, I'd still be voting now. This vote is not "introducing [a] false dichotomy", because the dichotomy is real: we either accept the result of the vote on meta, or we reject that result. Those are our options. —Ruakh TALK 01:25, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * So the only reason why you're supporting the book logo is because it has won the vote at meta, regardless of your previous preference? OK, that is your right. However, your reasoning is not likely to be shared by other individuals.
 * The point that I'm trying to make is, if there is a vote proposing change of official logo, it should be proposed in a way that gives equal opportunity to all the alternatives. There has to be free choice among multiple options. By forming the vote in a way that the only option is for the book logo (and against the text logo; there is not even an option for the text logo, which should be in order to balance out votes of those who'd support either, or have mild preference to one of the options but wouldn't mind if the other "won"), unfair preference is given to that particular option.
 * The dichotomy is false because it doesn't include all of the available options. It is as if the vote was carefully crafted in other for the book logo to pass. Given that the book logo at meta only "won" by a slight margin (5%), this seems rather unfair. --Ivan Štambuk 02:02, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Other options? There was a vote at meta.  This vote decides whether we accept the results of that vote as applying here.  Either we do accept the results of that vote or we don't. --EncycloPetey 02:12, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * What would you suggest? That each Wiktionary hold entirely independent votes on which logo to use, and each Wiktionary use the winner of their own vote? --Yair rand 02:11, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Either that, or all the wiktionaries should use the logo that won on meta without a local vote. If there has to be a local vote, it must be put forth in a way giving all the alternatives equal opportunity of winning, regardless of the outcome of the meta vote. It's pointless to vote on the results of votes elsewhere. The way this vote is proposed, it gives an undue precedence to a particular logo, that could have won the local vote, but it just as easily might have not won it. There has to be choice among all the options, not only among the selected few. --Ivan Štambuk 02:36, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose  It doesn't improve on most of the current logo's failings, and it doesn't even fit the definition of a logo (it's representative, not symbolic nor emblematic). It doesn't matter who likes or doesn't like it: a logo is functional artwork, and this product fails to fulfil its intended functions. (And why is this vote started before meta have finished with the planned touch-ups?) —Michael Z. 2010-03-29 05:26 z
 * 2) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose Dan Polansky 09:19, 29 March 2010 (UTC) The vote on Meta was designed as almost a winner-takes-all vote, allowing only two candidates to pass to the round two. In addition, I find this picture wholly unacceptable as a "logo". I understand that if enough Wiktionaries reject the result of the Meta vote, we'll stay with the status quo. --Dan Polansky 09:19, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose --Dijan 12:58, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose In my opinion this isn't a definitive logo for wiktionary communities. Waiting for a wider-consent logo, it's better to leave the current one--Diuturno 13:13, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * 5) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose I am a diehard supporter of the tile logo and no other logo is able to gain my support. The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 19:34, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * But the tile logo lost. The vote is finished. It can't just become the winner because the English Wiktionary decides to ignore the outcome. --Yair rand 20:08, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Hence being diehard. --Rising Sun talk? contributions 20:17, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * In sooth. The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 05:56, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Oppose. None of the logos I have seen express the concept of "words". Amgine/talk 06:17, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose. The ratification of this flawed vote should be rejected for a number of reasons. There were irregularities in the way in which the vote was run which undoubtedly affected the outcome. Many of these issues could have been worked out if the vote had been better planned or discussed, but it became clear that the organizers of the vote decided to simply start the vote without much interest from the community, and then declare that the vote was somehow official or agreed upom.
 * 3) *The current form of the logo is a copyright violation, as noted on the talk page, and as some of the supporters are aware. In more than two months, this apparently has not been fixed. The logo probably shouldn't even be displayed on this page until that is fixed.
 * 4) *No logo received a consensus. The two "winners" went to a runoff based on winning 12.5% and 10.8% of the vote, respectively. The final vote count when those two went to a runoff anyway was 55.9% to 44.1%. By comparison, recent votes here were rejected as lacking consensus with support levels at 63%, 55%, 55%, 62%, 60%, and so on. Furthermore, as you'll see, the vote tallies are not representative of the Wiktionary community's actual opinion anyway.
 * 5) *Despite the normal custom for votes on Meta, for some reason there were no suffrage requirements for this vote. For example, here is what the steward vote required for voter eligibility.
 * 6) **A number of voters have few edits, and would not even qualify under the very loose suffrage requirements we require here.
 * 7) **Many of the voters are also not Wiktionarians, being mostly Wikipedians and Metamedians.
 * 8) **Moreover, there was no attempt to determine whether the voters were who they claimed to be. It is typical on Meta votes to require voters to link between their Meta accounts and their main accounts on their home project to prove their identity. This was not done here for some reason.
 * 9) *The voting was set up in order to favor the outcome that occurred. It was designed, for no apparent reason, to go to a runoff of the two top finalists, when this merely ensured that the candidates which shared designs, color schemes, or certain elements would have their vote split. I have no idea why you would include two logos that varies only based on whether there is a large "W" over an identical graphic, or based on the size of a stylized finger over a graphic.
 * 10) *The actual rules of the vote continually changed during the vote. In the original version, the Meta vote would select a logo to submit to the Wiktionaries, and only the local votes would be binding on each project, as it is their right to select their own logo. If a binding Meta vote were desired, the projects should have agreed to be bound to the vote beforehand; none did. Then, without discussion, the vote page was changed to say it was a binding vote on all projects, then it wasn't again for a few hours, and then it maybe was, and then it really was. This was never agreed upon, however; before the vote, there had only been support for a non-binding result.
 * 11) *We all received spam on our talk pages here urging us to vote for one of the candidates, which was apparently acceptable, even though it clearly taints the results.
 * 12) *The vote was poorly translated and poorly advertised. Japanese, Arabic, Chinese, Korean, and many other languages didn't even have any information on the vote page in their language for one or both votes. Many Wiktionaries had no notice of the logo discussion or vote.
 * 13) *The 60% of Wiktionaries that are apparently needed to ratify the logo is an arbitrary and illogical selection. That number necessarily includes Wiktionaries with only a few hundred or thousand articles and few or zero editors. All Wiktionaries apparently have equal weight; the Spanish Wiktionary's four supporters in their completed vote are the same as all of us on this page.
 * 14) *The reason most of this makes little sense is because the rules and process of the vote were not discussed or agreed upon prior to the vote starting. It was essentially written in August by one Wikipedian who was never heard from again. After months of very little interest, some of which was negative anyway, the vote was simply started without any indication that there was a desire for one (the original proposal that started it all wasn't even made by a Wiktionarian). Moreover, in that time, one Wiktionary even voted to boycott the logo vote.
 * I cannot support any result of this logo "vote," and won't until there has been agreement and desire by and for Wiktionarians to change the logo, sufficient time given for discussion of process and proposals, and a valid consensus reached. Dominic·t 11:42, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay, one by one:
 * The copyvio can be easily fixed. I would have preferred waiting until the finished version was uploaded, but most people apparently thought that it didn't matter that much.
 * The point of the vote was to figure out which logo is the most preferred logo, so all that is needed is a majority. As you can probably figure out, it is impossible to have a multiple choice vote with a definitive result any other way.
 * Everyone was welcome to participate in discussion of how the vote should work, and many people did. There really were no objections when, after discussion, Epson291 added the decided rules on to the vote page.
 * The Dutch Wiktionary boycott was a result of the fact that the English Wiktionary did not begin to use the tile logo after the 2006 vote. The Dutch Wiktionarians view this as a perfectly good reason to not abide by this vote. This was not because of any particular problem with the new vote.
 * I fail to understand how Thecurran's completely unacceptable spam on talk pages is relevant to this vote.
 * The vote was advertised on every active Wiktionary, and on some inactive Wiktionaries just in case. I happen to think that the vote page was translated quite well, given the size of some of these communities.
 * The rules and process were discussed extensively before the start of the vote. I don't know where you got the idea that it was some spur-of-the-moment decision. And yes, the discussion was started by the Wikimedia volunteer coordinator. I fail to understand how you view this as a problem.
 * Yes, there was some confusion during the vote. Some people believed that there would be some foundation intervention about the results, some thought there wouldn't be. Does the confusion affect whether the results should be accepted?
 * If this vote passes along with many others, it does not mean that every Wiktionary will have to use the new logo. Those that vote against switching will keep their current logo. The many Wiktionaries that don't have any active communities that are using the old English text logo will likely be switched though, as will the logo on www.wiktionary.org and the favicon. --Yair rand 17:06, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I do think it is a problem that there was no collective will from the Wiktionary community to start the process, the process was biased towards a decision to hold an election in a certain way even though there was not much interest from the community, and non-community members were a major factor in making the decision, often based on clear misunderstandings about our project. If no one really thought that the logo was a priority, and only a handful of people cared enough to comment at all in the space of months, then the effort should have been scrapped, rather than take that as a sign that it was time to start voting. You say there was sufficient discussion of the process, translation, and advertisement, but it was clear to me throughout that this was not true. Obviously, suffrage is also a big issue that you didn't address, and one which I find makes it hard to believe there was much discussion (rather than declaring) about the procedure. How can you trust a process in which many of the voters were either complete newbies or from other projects, and there was no attempt to confirm their identity anyway? It's especially troubling since that was one of the main lessons we were supposed to have learned from the first logo vote. Dominic·t 21:35, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose Robert Ullmann 05:58, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose. First off I'm an active Wikipedia not Wiktionary editor, but I have to say that I do not approve of the new logo. I understand the old logo is not perfect, but the new one is worse. A good logo should convey the basic idea of what it is representing. The generic picture of a book does not do this for a dictionary. I'm sorry, but the people who want a new logo need to go back to the drawing board. Just because this logo proposal was the best of the worst does not mean it should be used. Bluepjs23 22:46, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I have stiked this vote, as the user has registed on 4 February 2010, after this Wiktionary vote started. --Dan Polansky 22:53, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * @Dan Polansky:Just a note: the user registered on 4 February 2010, before this vote started on 29 March 2010 --Diuturno 06:37, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Unstriking. What an embarassing mistake. --Dan Polansky 06:43, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose for various reasons, especially per Dominic (above).—msh210℠ on a public computer 20:14, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose Jesielt (user talk) 20:35, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose. The book logo is a nice graphic, but it is not suitable as a logo. At best, it is a decoration. A dictionary company might add the book graphic as a decorative mark at the bottom of the fly leaf, but no successful company has a company logo anything like that. As bad as the old logo is, it’s still a lot better than the book for the purposes of a logo. —Stephen 07:11, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose Neskaya contribs–talk? 15:42, 7 April 2010 (UTC) Per Amgine and Dominic.  Not to mention that I have continually objected to the entire way the vote was conducted. --Neskaya contribs–talk? 15:42, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * 5) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose SemperBlotto 16:34, 13 April 2010 (UTC) Different, but no better.
 * 6) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose Ultimateria 03:26, 15 April 2010 (UTC) - It's too complicated to be an effective logo, and there is no emphasis on words (see Amgine's comment). If that becomes our logo, I will think of an encyclopedia every time I see it. The current one get the point across, represents what we do, and I'm sure I speak for most Wiktionarians when I say I don't care about how it looks among the logos of our sister projects. The choice that was laid out like the current logo with Wikimedia colors and simple shapes is an ideal logo to me.
 * 7) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose ---> Tooironic 12:37, 29 April 2010 (UTC) I, um, kinda hate it... ---> Tooironic 12:37, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Abstain

 * 1) [[Image:Symbol abstain vote.svg|20px]] Abstain  Although this logo wasn't one that I supported in round 1, I was actually starting to get a bit excited about it. But Dominic makes persuasive arguments, and I can't support all Wiktionaries' being bound by the result of such a flawed voting process. —Ruakh TALK 16:34, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) [[Image:Symbol abstain vote.svg|20px]] Abstain Circeus 01:58, 3 April 2010 (UTC) I think the new logo creates problems of its own, but am torn between that issue and my advocacy for consistency across languages. Circeus 01:58, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) * [[Image:Symbol abstain vote.svg|20px]] Abstain —Internoob (Disc•Cont) 02:39, 13 April 2010 (UTC) I would like to support it, except I want to be assured that someone will fix the copyvio issue.
 * Skalman put together a version with the left page blurred on the logo toolserver page, effectively eliminating the copyvio. The only problem is that version has a capital T in "the free dictionary". (See here.) --Yair rand 14:30, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
 * So now we have a logo that we all know includes copyvio, but part of it looks out-of-focus. This is not refinement or improvement of a professional-quality logo. It is embarrassing. —Michael Z. 2010-04-13 16:29 z
 * 1) [[Image:Symbol abstain vote.svg|20px]] Abstain —Nils von Barth (nbarth) (talk) 05:03, 27 April 2010 (UTC) I support a unified logo, and there are problems with the current logo, but… I was singularly unexcited by the design/voting, and the proposed logo is dire (generic book, uniconic by any stretch). I’m hesitant to say “throw it out, do over”, but I think we’d be better served if WMF decided that an error was made in the first place, that this process isn’t working, hire a professional branding organization to come up with something acceptable, and have a better-organized vote.
 * 1) [[Image:Symbol abstain vote.svg|20px]] Abstain —Nils von Barth (nbarth) (talk) 05:03, 27 April 2010 (UTC) I support a unified logo, and there are problems with the current logo, but… I was singularly unexcited by the design/voting, and the proposed logo is dire (generic book, uniconic by any stretch). I’m hesitant to say “throw it out, do over”, but I think we’d be better served if WMF decided that an error was made in the first place, that this process isn’t working, hire a professional branding organization to come up with something acceptable, and have a better-organized vote.

Discussion
Just pointing out a few things: Back in January, during the second round, Cary Bass (Bastique), the WMF Volunteer Coordinator, posted a note on the vote talk page saying "The original Wiktionary logo was only ever intended as a fill-in logo until a new logo could be established, and will be entirely displaced by the results of this poll. ... Any project which is not the tiled will automatically be switched to a localized version of the winning logo." A couple weeks ago, I asked Bastique (here) whether this meant the result would be enforced by the foundation and whether the local vote was supposed to be happening at all, and received the answer "as the project never "approved" any logo whatsoever, and the overall vote was in favor of changing the default logo, changing to this logo would seem to be the appropriate outcome for the English Wiktionary and any other projects which have never voted to approve a logo. A vote to set the original logo as the logo of the English Wiktionary is the only outcome that would dictate otherwise." Whether this vote is supposed to be happening or not, whether there will be WMF intervention or not, and what exactly will happen when this vote is closed remain, to me at least, completely unclear. Hopefully it is all perfectly clear to everyone else, and I'm just utterly clueless. (Note: I'd appreciate it if no one were to respond in such a way as to start a large and pointless flamewar. Thanks.) --Yair rand 06:10, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Nah, there's at least two of us utterly clueless. --Thrissel 10:35, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, Cary's statement only makes sense if the Wiktionary community were to actually have come together as a community and decide on a different logo. That's not an accurate description of what happened, as we had a flawed election with no voter criteria, no oversight, too many non-Wiktionarians. I think Cary seems to care more about Wiktionary having a unified logo than about having a logo we actually agree on. That he thinks the tile logo had broad support last time around is, I think, evidence that he is out of touch with our community. Dominic·t 08:00, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

I understand Cary's reasoning, but it should have been applied to the tile logo (or there should have been a requirement that all projects organize an internal vote about the tile logo before organizing a new vote for a new logo, in order to clarify things). And I have no idea of what the result of a vote (here) about the tile logo would have been: the result of the fr.wiktionary vote was quite unexpected, a few opponents don't mean that that most contributors disagree. Lmaltier 17:11, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Decision

 * I would say that the vote has been decided. Hello, new logo!!!! :) The spesh man 13:58, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Ummm...no. With 60% supporting (not counting abstain votes), the result is No consensus.  -Atelaes λάλει ἐμοί 14:25, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Just out of curiosity, why discount the abstentions and give a qualified summary? The full picture is that 57% of participants support, 37% oppose, and 7% abstained. —Michael Z. 2010-04-29 15:03 z

 * I guess my understanding was that abstain genuinely meant abstain, and wouldn't count for or against. If you take percentage to be the determining factor, which I believe to be the case, counting your way makes abstain votes count just as much against consensus as oppose votes.  I could be wrong, but if so, I would appreciate a link.  -Atelaes λάλει ἐμοί 15:17, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

 * That's right. But it gives a sense of how the community feels, and it's significant when a vote's purpose is to uphold something (as here) or to deny something. If 20% vote in favour of something and 85% abstain, then we couldn't claim that the community supports it. (And if a hundred members took the trouble to register their abstention, then we couldn't say that nobody cares.) It may not be that important here, but I am suspicious of the 55%–44% final vote on Meta, which tossed out the opinion of anyone who disliked both choices – any claims that 55% of the community supported the winner would be misleading. Sorry I don't have a reference; that's just my interpretation of abstentions. —Michael Z. 2010-04-29 16:08 z

 * And just to clarify (since those unfamiliar with our practices may not be familiar with this one), no consensus is effectively a failure. —msh210℠ 15:57, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
 * This vote ends at 23:59, 29 April. That's in 7 hours. --Yair rand 16:54, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
 * No consensus 26-17-3. It remains unclear what happens now. --Yair rand 00:07, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

 * Clearly, nothing. We haven't voted to accept, so we stick with Old Texty until another proposal appears. I'm curious about how many Wiktionaries will accept this one, and how many weeks it will be until someone executes the graphical tweaks. —Michael Z. 2010-04-30 05:24 z
 * You have made your views clear many times before. As explained above, whether this vote was supposed to happen, and what the result will be, remain unclear. Since no good can come from debating the topic endlessly, I suggest that no further comment be made on it. Past this, the conclusion is out of the hands of the community. I do not intend to respond to any further comment here, and I suggest everyone else do the same. All that could come from continuing discussion is wasting time from building the dictionary. --Yair rand 05:48, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

 * Let me only note that my understanding of the result is the same as the one of Atelaes: 60% supporting, not counting abstain votes, the result is No consensus. The tradition is to discount abstaining votes when determining the percentage. And regardless of the tradition: if abstaining votes would be counted, they would have exactly the same effect as opposing votes, so this way of counting does not even make sense, as Atelaes said. --Dan Polansky 13:53, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

 * What is the difference between a result of no consensus and a result of fail? < class="latinx">Ƿidsiþ 14:21, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
 * None, or so I'm told. 91.105.22.190 14:33, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Roughly the same as the difference between a vote of weak support or weak oppose and a vote of strong support or strong oppose. The effect is the same either way, but inquiring minds like to know this sort of thing. —Ruakh TALK 16:50, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

 * I would actually say make this vote longer, only 46 out of thousands voted. Why, because nobody knew about the vote.  I think there should be a banner at the top and extend this vote 1 month, after there is banner about the vote.  This was like a small portion.  There could be many supporters, opposers, and abstainers.  We really need to extend this vote. The spesh man 04:14, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Let me point out that this is a vote of English Wiktionary; Wiktionaries in other languages have each their own vote. I have never seen "thounsands" of voters vote for anything in English Wiktionary. This vote has more participants than is usual in votes on English Wiktionary; some users who contributed nothing to English Wiktionary have participated.
 * Let me also quote from Meta the part of the voting process that seems to call for this vote:
 * "Following logo modifications, each of Wiktionary's language editions will hold their own vote on whether to approve or reject the winning logo. If 60% of the Wiktionaries approve of the logo, it will be applied to all of those Wiktionaries. Otherwise, this logo contest will have no effect, and each wiki will continue to use its current logo.
 * --Dan Polansky 05:48, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
 * "Following logo modifications." Does this mean that they had already happened or that this vote was pointless from the very beginnning? --Thrissel 08:45, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

 * Was discussed briefly at Beer_parlour_archive/2010/March. —Michael Z. 2010-05-01 18:40 z

 * Fine, but their was no banner. Stretching this vote 1 more month with the banner, will show more users about this vote.  I mean, come on, you had to go through a whole bunch of pages to get to it.  Nobody knew about this vote. The spesh man 21:14, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Looks to me that lots of people knew about this vote. —Michael Z. 2010-05-03 05:36 z

Number of participants in all recently ended votes
 * 5 Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2010-03/User:Darkicebot for bot status 4 withdrawn by nom.
 * 26 Wiktionary:Votes/bc-2010-03/User:Stephen G. Brown for bureaucrat passes
 * 8 Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2010-03/User:MewBot for bot status passes
 * ~13 Votes/pl-2010-03/Including particular individuals fails.
 * 9 Votes/pl-2010-03/Bolding letters in initialisms fails.
 * 14 Votes/2010-03/All ISO 639 codes to meet CFI as Translingual entries no consensus
 * 10 Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2010-04/User:MglovesfunBot for bot status passes
 * 11 Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2010-03/User:CodeCat for admin passes
 * 16 Votes/pl-2010-02/Wikification of language names in Translation sections passes
 * 46 Votes/2010-02/Accepting the results of the Wiktionary logo vote no consensus

 * 46 is not a lot of votes. Far from enough.  The spesh man 22:41, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Also, without the abstain, which kind of does nothing, you get more than 60%. Abstain is pretty much like neutral, like you weren't in the vote. <p class="toccolours" style="border: 1px solid #000000; padding: 1em;">"Following logo modifications, each of Wiktionary's language editions will hold their own vote on whether to approve or reject the winning logo. If 60% of the Wiktionaries approve of the logo, it will be applied to all of those Wiktionaries. Otherwise, this logo contest will have no effect, and each wiki will continue to use its current logo. The spesh man 22:47, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

 * The vote's over. One month was plenty of time, and the vote was advertised as well as any vote is.  Almost all of our regular contributors have voted.  I'm not terribly happy with the result either, but get over it, please.   -Atelaes λάλει ἐμοί 23:19, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

 * So the vote "failed", and the new logo was applied regardless? --Ivan Štambuk 19:53, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm with Strambuk. This vote did not, in my opinion, have enough support or concensus to have it pass, so the new logo should not have been applied until a concensus is reached, which, in my opinion, has not been achieved. <b style="color:#00C">Raz</b><b style="color:#009">or</b><b style="color:#006">fl</b><b style="color:#003">am</b><b style="color:#000">e</b> 19:57, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

 * Yeah, what the heck is with that? Nothing's supposed to happen unless and until the logo is updated and 60% of Wiktionary projects approve it. Who thinks they have the right to mess around with the main project branding? Restore the logo, now! —Michael Z. 2010-05-08 21:50 z

 * Ah, see File:Wiki.png. Thanks for restoring the logo, Prince K. Yair, please don't unilaterally mess with major site elements. This would deserve an editing block, in my opinion. —Michael Z. 2010-05-08 22:02 z
 * A few days ago, I asked Cary Bass what happens now that the English Wiktionary logo acceptance vote has failed, and I received the answer "...The English Wiktionary has never voted to have any logo. The default logo should be changed to the one the overall community voted for.  The English Wiktionary should therefore have the default logo.  Someone should file a bug to change the default logo." Apparently this vote was not supposed to happen, and this was all a huge mistake made by me. Not only that, but apparently I publicized a whole lot of things related to the logo vote that were incorrect. I am terribly sorry about this.
 * I submitted a bug report, as apparently was supposed to happen, to change the logo to the one voted for by the overall community. --Yair rand 05:23, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

If he really wants to ignore our community, he should perform the change himself as an w:WP:OFFICE action. -- Prince Kassad 08:28, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
 * It's not ignoring the community, I think the whole point is that you've never had a successful vote to pick what logo you want so the default global logo is what you get. By uploading the old 'default' logo, you've in fact fiat accepted the old logo as one everybody wants. Which isn't true as it has not been accepted through a vote. OverlordQ 20:56, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I agree, though I think it would be preferable if the change was performed through a foundation action anyway. --Yair rand 21:08, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm the only one thinking that the logo decision is getting ridiculous? The voting process has been definitively compromised by childish policies and logo selection. We have the possibility to learn from our errors: the fairest way is to restart the global voting including all the policy improvements proposed. Otherwise the WMF should nullify the global vote and impose whatever logo they wants, as it seems they are doing with the book logo (FYI this is the opened bug). --Diuturno 09:44, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

'ABSTAIN MAKES NO SENSE' The spesh man 19:22, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Abstain makes plenty of sense, and is traditionally used in English Wiktionary. See also the paragraph above starting with "Let me only note that my understanding of the result is the same as the one of Atelaes:...". --Dan Polansky 05:47, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

es:Wikcionario:Votaciones/2010/Logotipo no:Wiktionary:Tinget pt:Wikcionário:Votações/Validação do resultado do novo logo do Wikcionário simple:Wiktionary:Votes/2010-02/Accepting the results of the Wiktionary logo vote sv:Wiktionary:Bybrunnen


text:
autoweg

Etymology
Compound of.

Noun

 * 1) freeway, highway, motorway

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: autoweg


text: autoweggetje

title: autoweggetje


text: autowegen

title: autowegen


text:
Talk:dead ball

dead ball
Rfv-sense: (cricket) An arm signal given by the umpire in certain circumstances when the ball becomes dead (arms crossed and re-crossed below the waist).

Is it appropriate and accurate to assign this name to a signal from the umpire? Should this be done for all signals made by people in various identifiable circumstances? A policeman giving a stop sign, should that be a definition of stop? __meco 20:31, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

 * I wouldn't think that there would be much usage of "dead ball" to refer to the signal as opposed to what was signified. This contrasts with "wave", "salute", "thumbs up", "red light". We could have at least three senses: the state of the ball, the determination by the umpire that the ball was in that state, the indication that the ball was in that state. And perhaps in professional sports, the official record that the ball was in that state. But that way madness lies, for most entries. DCDuring TALK 20:57, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

 * Here's a troublesome citation:
 * 2005, "Cricket for beginners", part IV, BBC News, Aug 26, 2005
 * In one of Australia's recent innings, the umpire gave a dead ball as the ball hit ....
 * That would seem to refer to the signal rather than the signified. I think I will leave this to the philosophers. DCDuring TALK 21:09, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Maybe move to RFD as redundant to the first sense. Mglovesfun (talk) 21:16, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

from the entry:
 * 1)  An arm signal given by the umpire in certain circumstances when the ball becomes dead (arms crossed and re-crossed below the waist).

title: Talk:dead ball


text:
bakmeel

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) fine flour

title: bakmeel


text:
bankbediende

Etymology
Compound of.

Noun

 * 1) a bank teller, cashier

title: bankbediende


text: Category:ja:Sighthounds

title: Category:ja:Sighthounds


text: Category:Designer dogs

title: Category:Designer dogs


text: Category:ja:Hunting dogs

title: Category:ja:Hunting dogs


text:
gépágyú

Noun

 * 1) autocannon

title: gépágyú


text: gépágyúk

title: gépágyúk


text: bankbediendes

title: bankbediendes


text: bankbedienden

title: bankbedienden


text: black fly

title: black fly


text: Category:User be-2

title: Category:User be-2


text: stelletje

title: stelletje


text:
bankstel

Etymology
Compound of.

Noun

 * 1) a lounge suite
 * een leren bankstelletje: a leather lounge suite

title: bankstel


text: bankstelletje

title: bankstelletje


text: bankstellen

title: bankstellen


text:
gépel

Verb

 * 1)  to type to put text on paper using a typewriter

title: gépel


text:
tone mark

Noun

 * 1)  A symbol used to indicate tones in tonal languages.

Translations

 * Arabic:
 * Burmese:
 * Chinese:
 * Mandarin: 聲調符號
 * Finnish: toonimerkki
 * French: marque de ton
 * German:
 * Hindi:
 * Japanese: 声調記号
 * Khmer: តានា
 * Lao: ວັນນະຍຸດ
 * Portuguese: marca de tom
 * Russian: то́новый знак
 * Spanish: marca de tono
 * Thai:
 * Ukrainian:
 * Vietnamese: dấu thanh điệu
 * Yoruba: àmì ohùn

title: tone mark


text: tone marks

title: tone marks


text:
bustehouder

Etymology
From, or , itself from French.

Noun

 * a

title: bustehouder


text: bustehouders

title: bustehouders


text: bustehoudertje

title: bustehoudertje


text:
gun lobby

Noun

 * 1)  An organized group which attempts to influence public policy and law with respect to firearms, especially as an advocate of ownership of and access to firearms by individual citizens.

title: gun lobby


text:
beha

Etymology
Letter-pronunciation of, abbreviation of.

Noun

 * a

Etymology
Borrowed from.

Noun

 * 1)  bra

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) flying fox

title: beha


text: beha's

title: beha's


text: behaatje

title: behaatje


text: bekje

title: bekje


text: bekkens

title: bekkens


text: bekkentje

title: bekkentje


text:
broodbeleg

Etymology
Compound of.

Noun

 * 1) bread topping (such as cheese, meat or jam)

title: broodbeleg


text:
broodbelegsel

Etymology
Compound of.

Noun

 * 1) bread topping

title: broodbelegsel


text: broodbelegsels

title: broodbelegsels


text:
mormota

Etymology
Borrowed from.

Noun

 * 1) marmot any of the large squirrels in the genus
 * 2)  sleepyhead a person who sleeps heavily and long

title: mormota


text: mormoták

title: mormoták


text:
bevallen

Etymology 1
From. Equivalent to.

Verb

 * 1)  to please, satisfy
 * 2)  to give birth

title: bevallen


text:
bewolking

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) cloud cover

title: bewolking


text:
biljet

Etymology
From, from ; the current spelling and pronunciation is based on modern.

Noun

 * 1) a note
 * 2) a banknote
 * 3) a ticket

title: biljet


text: biljetje

title: biljetje


text: biljetten

title: biljetten


text:
binnenkomen

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to enter, to come inside

title: binnenkomen


text: prepozicioj

title: prepozicioj


text: prepozicion

title: prepozicion


text: prepoziciojn

title: prepoziciojn


text: enzimek

title: enzimek


text: Category:hu:Enzymes

title: Category:hu:Enzymes


text: Category:hu:Proteins

title: Category:hu:Proteins


text: vegetable soups

title: vegetable soups


text: evidensebb

title: evidensebb


text: legevidensebb

title: legevidensebb


text: harcosok

title: harcosok


text:
port arms

Verb

 * 1)  To carry one's personal firearm diagonally in front of the body.

Noun

 * 1)  The position of a weapon carried diagonally in front of the body.

title: port arms


text:
User talk:Mellyvilly

Welcome!

Hello, welcome to Wiktionary, and thank you for your contribution so far. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

 * How to edit a page is a concise list of technical guidelines to the wiki format we use here: how to, for example, make text boldfaced or create hyperlinks. Feel free to practice in the sandbox. If you would like a slower introduction we have a short tutorial.
 * Entry layout explained (ELE) is a detailed policy documenting how Wiktionary pages should be formatted. All entries should conform to this standard, the easiest way to do this is to copy exactly an existing page for a similar word.
 * Our Criteria for inclusion (CFI) define exactly which words Wiktionary is interested in including. There is also a list of things that Wiktionary is not for a higher level overview.
 * The FAQ aims to answer most of your remaining questions, and there are several help pages that you can browse for more information.
 * We have discussion rooms in which you can ask any question about Wiktionary or its entries, a glossary of our technical jargon, and some hints for dealing with the more common communication issues.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wiktionarian! If you have any questions, bring them to the Information desk, or ask me on my talk page. If you do so, please sign your posts with four tildes: ~ which automatically produces your username and the current date and time.

Again, welcome! —Internoob (Disc.•Cont.) 01:03, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mellyvilly


text:
boffen

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to get lucky

title: boffen


text:
borrel

Etymology 1
Compare 🇨🇬 or 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) A sort of pear with a smooth soft pulp; a red butter pear.

Etymology 2
Probably from.

Adjective

 * , unlearned; belonging to the laity, a mean fellow.

Etymology
Diminutive of. Compare.

Noun

 * 1) a  of an  drink such as  or ; a
 * 2) an, often   or , typically involving alcoholic drinks

title: borrel


text: borreltje

title: borreltje


text: borrels

title: borrels


text:
bovenzijde

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) upper side,

title: bovenzijde


text:
User:Mellyvilly

Frounselor - (circa 2009) meaning camp counselor and friend. Created at Camp Happy Days for children with cancer (South Carolina).

Used in a sentence: Has anyone seen my Frounselor? I can't find my Frounselor.

Created by LR and MK

title: User:Mellyvilly


text:
braaf

Etymology
Borrowed from, borrowed from. More at.

Adjective

 * 1) well-behaved, obedient
 * 2)  honorable, virtuous

title: braaf


text: braafst

title: braafst


text:
braaksel

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) vomit that which one has vomited out. More formal than kots.

title: braaksel


text: busje

title: busje


text:
brievenbus

Etymology
Compound of.

Noun

 * 1) letterbox, mailbox, post box
 * 2) mail slot, letterbox

title: brievenbus


text: brievenbusje

title: brievenbusje


text: brievenbussen

title: brievenbussen


text:
snara

Noun

 * 1) a trap, a snare
 * 2) a noose
 * 3)  a loop

Verb

 * 1)  to snare, to lasso
 * 2)  to translate hastily

Etymology
From, from.

Noun

 * 1) snare

Etymology
From, from , from.

Noun

 * 1) a snare, a trap
 * 2) a noose

title: snara


text:
vantrú

Etymology
From, from. Cognates with Danish.

Noun

 * 1) disbelief, a lack of faith
 * 2) no confidence, a lack of confidence

Derived terms

 * (nihilism, therapeutic nihilism)

title: vantrú


text: sōngjiéyóu

title: sōngjiéyóu


text: mùnǎiyī

title: mùnǎiyī


text:
MediaWiki:Gadget-WiktSidebarTranslation

Translate sidebar interwiki links to English.

title: MediaWiki:Gadget-WiktSidebarTranslation


text:
MediaWiki:Gadget-WiktSidebarTranslation.js

$(function{	$("#p-lang .interlanguage-link a").each(function{ var langnameMatch = $(this).attr("title").match(/(.*) – (.*)/); var langname = $(this).attr("title"); //some wiktionaries like afrikaans have '' as their main page if (langnameMatch && langnameMatch.length >= 3) langname = langnameMatch[2];

$(this).text(langname) .attr("lang", "en");//this line breaks compact languages });	$("#p-lang .interlanguage-link").sort(function(lia, lib){ return $(lia).children.first.text < $(lib).children.first.text ? -1 : 1;	}).appendTo("#p-lang>div>ul"); });


text:
tetchily

Etymology
From.

Adverb

 * 1) In an annoyed or irritated manner.

Translations

 * Finnish:
 * French: avec, , coléreusement,
 * Russian:
 * Spanish:, enojadosamente, iracundosamente,

title: tetchily


text:
PO'd

Etymology
Euphemistic and abbreviated form of.

Adjective

 * 1)  Annoyed; irritated; angry; fed up.

title: PO'd


text: po'd

title: po'd


text:
leasathair

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) stepfather

title: leasathair


text:
leasmháthair

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) stepmother

title: leasmháthair


text:
NIFO

Etymology
Abbreviation of NeIdentigita Fluganta Objekto

Noun

 * 1) UFO (an unidentified flying object)

Usage notes

 * NIFO has regular plural and accusative forms, though these can also be found with a hyphen inserted before the ending(s): ', ', .

title: NIFO


text:
leasainm

Etymology
From. Compare, from +. Compare 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) nickname

title: leasainm


text: Category:Palindromes by language

title: Category:Palindromes by language


text:
leas-ainm

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) nickname

title: leas-ainm


text:
ΠΣΑ

Noun

 * , the Programme for Stability and Growth.

title: ΠΣΑ


text: Category:Irish terms prefixed with leas-


text: Category:el:Economics

title: Category:el:Economics


text:
leasmhac

Noun

 * 1) stepson

title: leasmhac


text: Category:el:Society

title: Category:el:Society


text:
leasrí

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) regent
 * 2) viceroy

title: leasrí


text: gansje

title: gansje


text: ganzen

title: ganzen


text:
lhiass-

Etymology
Cognate to 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬 and 🇨🇬.

Prefix

 * 1) step-
 * 2) vice-, deputy, assistant

title: lhiass-


text: Category:Manx prefixes

title: Category:Manx prefixes


text:
Category talk:Derogatory

Do we really need this category when we have Category:Pejoratives and Category:Offensive?

Derogatory is basically a synonym for pejorative.

It would be easier to find pejorative terms without having to look through two category lists. Facts707 06:56, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

title: Category talk:Derogatory


text:
sleepwagen

Noun

 * 1) tow truck

title: sleepwagen


text: sleepwagens

title: sleepwagens


text: sleepwagentje

title: sleepwagentje


text:
briw

Noun

 * 1) person

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) judge, brehon

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) oatmeal, porridge

Etymology
From, from. Cognate with 🇨🇬 and 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) cut, sore, wound
 * 2) bruise
 * 3) ulcer
 * 4) afterbirth
 * 1) afterbirth

title: briw


text:
lhiass-vriw

Noun

 * 1) deputy judge

title: lhiass-vriw


text:
installatie

Noun

 * 1) installation
 * 2) something that's installed such as machinery

title: installatie


text: installaties

title: installaties


text: installatietje

title: installatietje


text:
hefinstallatie

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) a part of a machinery that's used to raise heavy objects; a hook and chain, a sling

title: hefinstallatie


text: hefinstallaties

title: hefinstallaties


text:
lhiass-eaghtyrane

Noun

 * 1) vice-president

title: lhiass-eaghtyrane


text:
lhiass-eaghtyraneys

Noun

 * 1) vice-presidency

title: lhiass-eaghtyraneys


text:
eaghtyrane

Etymology
From. . Cognate to and.

Noun

 * 1) president

title: eaghtyrane


text:
eaghtyraneys

Noun

 * 1) presidency

title: eaghtyraneys


text:
hemelhoog

Adjective

 * 1) sky high, very high

Adverb

 * 1) sky high

title: hemelhoog


text:
eaghtyr

Etymology
From, from , ultimately from.

Noun

 * 1) surface, top
 * 2) overburden, superstructure
 * 1) overburden, superstructure
 * 1) overburden, superstructure
 * 1) overburden, superstructure

title: eaghtyr


text: Tutanchamun

title: Tutanchamun


text:
wenk

Noun

 * 1) a hint or a sign with certain body movements such as wink, nod or wave

title: wenk


text: wenkje

title: wenkje


text:
wenken

Etymology 1
From, from , from.

Verb

 * 1) to beckon, wave
 * 2) to warn by hinting with body movements

Etymology
From, from , from. See also and  from the same root. Cognate with 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1) to wave
 * 2) to beckon

Etymology
From, from.

Verb

 * 1) to sway
 * 2) to forsake, to become unfaithful
 * 3) to give a sign
 * 4) to wink, to give a sign with the eyes

title: wenken


text:
úachtar

Etymology
From.

Compare 🇨🇬, ; Latin,.

Noun

 * 1) surface, top
 * 2) cream

title: úachtar


text:
کجا

Etymology
From. .

Adverb

 * 1)  where
 * 2)  how; when; under what conditions
 * 1)  how; when; under what conditions
 * 1)  how; when; under what conditions
 * 1)  how; when; under what conditions
 * 1)  how; when; under what conditions

Conjunction

 * 1)  because

title: کجا


text:
fruibilità

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) usability, availability

title: fruibilità


text:
úachtarán

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) chief, leader

title: úachtarán


text:
opzoeken

Verb

 * 1) to visit
 * 2) to seek, look for
 * 3) to look up (e.g. in a directory)

title: opzoeken


text:
remissibilmente

Etymology
From.

Adverb

 * 1) pardonably, forgivably

title: remissibilmente


text:
indifendibilmente

Etymology
From.

Adverb

 * 1) indefensibly

title: indifendibilmente


text:
lhiass-ayr

Noun

 * 1) stepfather

title: lhiass-ayr


text:
lhiass-voir

Noun

 * 1) stepmother

title: lhiass-voir


text:
lhiass-vac

Noun

 * 1) stepson

title: lhiass-vac


text:
lhiass-inneen

Noun

 * 1) stepdaughter

title: lhiass-inneen


text:
lhiass-vraar

Noun

 * 1) stepbrother

title: lhiass-vraar


text:
lhiass-huyr

Noun

 * 1) stepsister

title: lhiass-huyr


text:
lhiass-ennym

Noun

 * 1) nickname, alias
 * 2) euphemism

title: lhiass-ennym


text:
llysfamau

Etymology
From.

title: llysfamau


text:
fusibilità

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) fusibility

title: fusibilità


text:
llysfeibion

Etymology
From.

title: llysfeibion


text:
llysferched

Etymology
From.

title: llysferched


text:
llystadau

Etymology
From.

title: llystadau


text: lhiass ree

title: lhiass ree


text: Category:Manx terms prefixed with lhiass-


text:
lhiass-reeaght

Noun

 * 1) regency

title: lhiass-reeaght


text:
lhiass-ennymagh

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) euphemistic

title: lhiass-ennymagh


text:
心臟

Noun

 * 1)  heart
 * 2) heart the central part of something or some place
 * 1) heart the central part of something or some place
 * 1) heart the central part of something or some place
 * 1) heart the central part of something or some place

Noun

 * : heart organ

title: 心臟


text:
crapahuter

Etymology
From, from.

Verb

 * 1)  to walk to battle, especially over difficult terrain; to yomp

title: crapahuter


text:
中腦

Noun

 * 1)  midbrain

title: 中腦


text: 中脑

title: 中脑


text:
萬死

Verb

 * 1) to die ten thousand deaths

title: 萬死


text: ciarlatanate

title: ciarlatanate


text: cibernauti

title: cibernauti


text: cibernaute

title: cibernaute


text: cicatricole

title: cicatricole


text: cicci

title: cicci


text: cicerbite

title: cicerbite


text: ciclammati

title: ciclammati


text: ciarlatanesca

title: ciarlatanesca


text: ciarlataneschi

title: ciarlataneschi


text: ciarlatanesche

title: ciarlatanesche


text: cicciottella

title: cicciottella


text: cicciottelli

title: cicciottelli


text: cicciottelle

title: cicciottelle


text: Thaleichthys pacificus

title: Thaleichthys pacificus


text:
duidelijkheid

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) clarity, clearness

title: duidelijkheid


text: ruwheid

title: ruwheid


text:
matheid

Noun

 * 1) listlessness, lethargy, lack of energy and enthusiasm

title: matheid


text:
innuendis

Etymology
From the, ablative plural form of , gerund of.

Noun

 * 1) * 2002 December 30, The First Geer Family, rec.scouting.issues (Google group): Question for Brian or Merlyn:
 * Especially, considering you’ll do anything to do it, such as editing another’s post, snip out portions that don’t go along with your innuendis, etc.
 * Especially, considering you’ll do anything to do it, such as editing another’s post, snip out portions that don’t go along with your innuendis, etc.

title: innuendis


text: ringvingers

title: ringvingers


text: ringvingertje

title: ringvingertje


text:
pinken

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  To become pink.
 * 2)  To make pink.
 * 3)  To blush.
 * 1)  To blush.

Translations

 * Bulgarian: порозовявам
 * Esperanto: roziĝi
 * French:

 * Esperanto: rozi
 * French:

 * Bulgarian: изчервявам се
 * Esperanto: ruĝiĝi
 * French:

title: pinken


text: pinkje

title: pinkje


text: wijsvingers

title: wijsvingers


text: wijsvingertje

title: wijsvingertje


text:
middelvinger

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) middle finger

title: middelvinger


text: middelvingers

title: middelvingers


text: middelvingertje

title: middelvingertje


text: golden retrieveren

title: golden retrieveren


text: golden retrievere

title: golden retrievere


text:
oppositie

Etymology
From, from , from , from , translating Ancient Greek , from the past participle stem of classical.

Noun

 * 1) parliamentary  non-government factions in parliament
 * , resistance
 * , resistance
 * , resistance
 * , resistance

title: oppositie


text: golden retrieverne

title: golden retrieverne


text: golden retrieverens

title: golden retrieverens


text: golden retrieveres

title: golden retrieveres


text: golden retrievernes

title: golden retrievernes


text: golden retrievertje

title: golden retrievertje


text:
-iau

Suffix

 * 1) Used to form diminutive forms of nouns
 * agniau - lamb (small sheep)

Etymology
Cognate with 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Suffix

 * , -s

title: -iau


text: Category:Welsh terms suffixed with -iau

title: Category:Welsh terms suffixed with -iau


text:
avaloù

Noun

 * : apples

title: avaloù


text:
-ow

Etymology
Cognate to 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Suffix

 * 1) Pluralization suffix, roughly equivalent to -s

Etymology 1
From native West Slavic languages, such as.

Etymology 2
From and.

Suffix

 * 1) Dual subject pronoun marker.

title: -ow


text:
environmentalista

Noun

 * 1) environmentalist

title: environmentalista


text:
chiow

Usage notes
This is a neologism in the revived language; traditionally, is used as the plural of.

title: chiow


text: 三味线

title: 三味线


text: loyow

title: loyow


text: Category:Welsh terms suffixed with -ion

title: Category:Welsh terms suffixed with -ion


text:
-ioù

Etymology
Cognate with 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

title: -ioù


text:
Talk:heya

How can heya be an alternative spelling of hiya when it is pronunced entirely differently? Tooironic 10:10, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
 * It can't. I've seen a lot of these around, though, and I'd suggest using "alternative form" instead (what I would ususally do), or just create full-blown entries for both. – Krun 10:20, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

title: Talk:heya


text: Category:Breton plural suffixes

title: Category:Breton plural suffixes


text: Category:Breton terms suffixed with -ioù


text: Category:Breton terms suffixed with -ien


text: skolyow

title: skolyow


text: Category:br:Education

title: Category:br:Education


text: értelmezések

title: értelmezések


text: Category:Cornish plural suffixes

title: Category:Cornish plural suffixes


text: Category:Welsh plural suffixes

title: Category:Welsh plural suffixes


text:
stoða

Verb

 * 1)  to be of any use
 * 2) * Markúsarguðspjall 8 (English version)

Synonyms

 * ,, , , (archaic)

title: stoða


text: hasisok

title: hasisok


text: hatóságok

title: hatóságok


text: xīnlǐxué

title: xīnlǐxué


text: Category:Cornish terms suffixed with -yow


text:
-yow

Etymology
Cognate with 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

title: -yow


text:
бугарски

Adjective

 * 1) Bulgarian

Adjective

 * 1) Bulgarian
 * 2)  the Bulgarian language

Adverb

 * 1) in a Bulgarian manner, as a Bulgarian

title: бугарски


text:
-yon

Etymology
From,. Cognate to 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

title: -yon


text:
Talk:piece of cake

Pronunciation
I think the pronunciation is closer to /piːs ɔ keɪk/ than /piːs ɔv keɪk/. The audio file has /piːs ɔf keɪk/. If the <f> is not silent (which I believe it usually is), it is more likely that it should be pronounced with an /f/, given that the following /k/ is unvoiced, and therefore pronouncing the <f> as /v/ would require more effort. Jon Harald Søby 10:45, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Etymology
Is this of the same origin as cakewalk? Palosirkka 13:08, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Probably related, but not at all clear. DCDuring TALK 12:31, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Is this it [http://www.pages.drexel.edu/~zk32/clicheorigin.html That was a “Piece of Cake” Referring to something as a "piece of cake" is often used to describe a situation that was easy, or required little effort.

... The term was first used in print in 1936 by Ogden Nash who wrote, “Her picture’s in the papers now, and life’s a piece of cake.” Today the term is commonly used to describe tests at school, or friendly competitions. ]

title: Talk:piece of cake


text: Category:Cornish terms suffixed with -yon


text: Category:Welsh terms suffixed with -oedd


text:
antitop

Noun

 * 1)  the top antiquark

title: antitop


text:
top antiquark

Noun

 * 1)  The antiparticle of the top quark

title: top antiquark


text:
yarluwar

Noun

 * 1) the ocean or sea.

title: yarluwar


text:
atomistically

Adverb

 * 1) In an atomistic manner
 * 2) With regard to atomism

Translations

 * Polish: atomistycznie

 * Polish: atomistycznie

title: atomistically


text: 什么的

title: 什么的


text:
什麼的

Adverb

 * 1) and so on; and so forth
 * 2) or something; or anything

title: 什麼的


text: chiralons

title: chiralons


text:
arzhed

Noun

 * : bears

title: arzhed


text:
-où

Etymology
From, from. Cognate with 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

title: -où


text:
chiralon

Noun

 * 1)  Any of a family of proposed chiral mesons

title: chiralon


text:
mamoù

Noun

 * : mothers

title: mamoù


text:
cochannel

Adjective

 * 1) Describing any effect of multiple channels reacting together

title: cochannel


text:
identicus

Etymology
From Late Latin, from.

Adjective

 * 1)  same, identical

title: identicus


text:
dechanneling

Noun

 * 1) removal from a channel

title: dechanneling


text:
mammoù

Noun

 * : mothers

title: mammoù


text: kapcsolatok

title: kapcsolatok


text:
depairing

Noun

 * 1) The disruption of a pair

title: depairing


text: diagonalisability

title: diagonalisability


text:
holomorphy

Noun

 * 1)  holomorphic functions (or their study)

title: holomorphy


text:
intrapulse

Adjective

 * 1) Within a pulse

title: intrapulse


text:
identitas

Etymology
.

Alternative forms

 * idéntiti

Etymology
From, a. Compare,.

Noun

 * 1)  sameness, identicalness, identity

title: identitas


text:
invertibility

Etymology
, from.

Noun

 * 1)  The condition of being invertible.

title: invertibility


text: keplerian

title: keplerian


text: linearisability

title: linearisability


text:
linearizability

Noun

 * 1) The condition of being linearizable.
 * 2) The extent to which something is linearizable.

title: linearizability


text:
magnetooptical

Etymology

 * compare the better-formed

Adjective

 * 1) Having both magnetic and optical elements.
 * 2) Describing the effect of a magnetic field on an optical system.

Translations

 * French:
 * Tagalog: balnisugaanin

 * French:

title: magnetooptical


text: damyow

title: damyow


text:
stétta

Verb

 * 1)  to lay down a pavement
 * 2)  to carry out, to implement
 * 3)  to be of any use
 * 4)  to remedy something, to put to rights, to set to rights
 * 5)  to kill, to finish off

Etymology 1
From. Related to.

Verb

 * 1) to be the source of
 * 2) to aid, assist
 * 3) to do good

title: stétta


text: medoids

title: medoids


text:
chambour

Noun

 * 1) chamber, bedroom

title: chambour


text: chambouryow

title: chambouryow


text: chambours

title: chambours


text:
medoid

Noun

 * 1)  A mathematically representative object in a set of objects; it has the smallest average dissimilarity to all other objects in the set.

Translations

 * French:, médianoïde

title: medoid


text: Category:kw:Rooms

title: Category:kw:Rooms


text: golfeurs

title: golfeurs


text: golfeuse

title: golfeuse


text: metaplasms

title: metaplasms


text: golfeuses

title: golfeuses


text:
chymbla

Noun

 * 1) chimney

title: chymbla


text: chymblow

title: chymblow


text: chymblys

title: chymblys


text:
metaplasm

Etymology
From from.

Noun

 * 1)  Any change in a word made by altering its letters or sounds.
 * 2)  A small particle (often nutrient) within a cell.

Hyponyms

 * ,, , diaeresis, diastole
 * aphaeresis, syncope, apocope, ellipsis, ecthlipsis, synaloepha, synizesis, synaeresis, systole
 * metathesis
 * antisthecon
 * antisthecon

Translations

 * Catalan: metaplasme
 * French:
 * German: Metaplasmus
 * Greek:
 * Ancient: μεταπλασμός
 * Latin: metaplasmus
 * Occitan: metaplasme
 * Spanish:

 * Finnish: metaplasma
 * Tagalog: lakdawkaphay

title: metaplasm


text:
microfractionated

Adjective

 * 1) Separated into very small fractions

title: microfractionated


text:
meteoroložka

Noun

 * 1) female meteorologist

title: meteoroložka


text:
monodispersely

Adverb

 * 1) In a monodisperse manner
 * 2) So as to become monodisperse

title: monodispersely


text:
multicluster

Adjective

 * 1) Composed of multiple clusters

title: multicluster


text:
meteorologický

Adjective

 * 1) meteorological

title: meteorologický


text:
chaut

Etymology
.

Adjective

 * 1) hot heated; not cold

Noun

 * 1) hot; heat

title: chaut


text:
mamm-wynn

Noun

 * 1) grandmother

title: mamm-wynn


text:
pu:thi

Noun

 * 1) banknote

title: pu:thi


text:
dama-wydn

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) grandmother

title: dama-wydn


text:
taves

Etymology
From (compare 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬), from.

Noun

 * 1) tongue
 * 2) language

title: taves


text:
lhiass-chloan

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) stepchildren

title: lhiass-chloan


text:
lhiass-phaitçhey

Noun

 * 1) stepchild

title: lhiass-phaitçhey


text:
lhiass-vummig

Noun

 * 1) stepmum, stepmother

title: lhiass-vummig


text:
lhiass-yishag

Noun

 * 1) stepdad, stepfather

title: lhiass-yishag


text:
lhiass-phaitçhyn

Noun

 * 1) stepchildren
 * 1) stepchildren

title: lhiass-phaitçhyn


text: mayrey

title: mayrey


text:
mummig

Noun

 * 1) mum, mummy, mama

title: mummig


text:
jishag

Noun

 * 1) dad, daddy, papa

title: jishag


text: Բենգալուրու

title: Բենգալուրու


text: nukkin

title: nukkin


text:
Jishag y Nollick

Proper noun

 * 1) Santa Claus, Father Christmas

title: Jishag y Nollick


text:
allike

Noun

 * 1) jackdaw

title: allike


text: alliken

title: alliken


text: Category:gv:Christmas

title: Category:gv:Christmas


text: alliker

title: alliker


text: allikerne

title: allikerne


text: allikes

title: allikes


text: allikens

title: allikens


text: allikers

title: allikers


text: allikernes

title: allikernes


text:
fuld som en allike

Adjective
("drunk as a jackdaw")

 * 1)  drunk as a skunk highly inebriated

title: fuld som en allike


text:
mummig vooar

Etymology
From +.

Noun

 * 1) grandma, granny

title: mummig vooar


text:
jishag mooar

Noun

 * 1) grandpa, grandad

title: jishag mooar


text:
Talamh Naofa

Proper noun

 * 1)  the Holy Land

Usage notes

 * Always preceded by the definite article.

Synonyms

 * An Tír Bheannaithe

title: Talamh Naofa


text:
maghouin

Etymology
From. Cognate with 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) bear

title: maghouin


text: contre-torpilleur

title: contre-torpilleur


text: contre-torpilleurs

title: contre-torpilleurs


text:
áes

Etymology 1
From.

Noun

 * 1) age, years
 * 2) * Zeitschrift für Celtische Philologie, vi 58.15:
 * "sga"

- Is áis cét bliadan dam.

 * 1) stage, period
 * 2) era
 * 3) lifetime

Etymology 2
Perhaps, like etymology 1, derived from.

Noun

 * 1)  folk, people
 * "sga"
 * "sga"

- Amal du·berad nech hi ceist do Dauid: “Húare is móir sléb fírinne Dǽ, cid ara fodmai-siu, ⟨a⟩ Dauid, didiu a ndu imnedaib ⁊ frithoircnib fo·daimi? Air it fírían-⟨s⟩u.” Ícaid-som didiu anísin, a n‑as·mbeir iudicia Domini abisus multa .i. ataat mesai Dǽ nephchomtetarrachti amal abis ⁊ amal fudumain. Is ed in sin fod·era in n‑erígim, cid ara fodaim int aís fírían inna fochaidi, ⁊ cid ara mbiat in pecthaig isnaib soinmechaib.

Usage notes
Almost always qualified by an adjective, a noun in the genitive case, or a relative clause describing what kind of folk are in question.

title: áes


text:
Թամիլնադ

Proper noun

 * 1) Tamil Nadu

title: Թամիլնադ


text: torpilleurs

title: torpilleurs


text:
enculer les mouches

Etymology
lit. 'to sodomize flies'.

Verb

 * 1)  to split hairs; to nitpick

Conjugation

 * see

title: enculer les mouches


text:
Talk:ardi gasna

From WT:RFC
Lowercase? --Connel MacKenzie 22:14, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Seemingly like the names of most cheeses, the capitalisation of the name is not fixed (e.g. cheddar and Cheddar are used interchangeably to refer to the cheese, although the toponym is universally capitalised). In this instance, there are too few b.g.c hits in English to form a representative sample, but about 70-80% of the google web hits are capitalised.
 * According to the google web hits, "Ardi Gasana" is not a toponym, but is Basque for "sheep's cheese" (or "ewe's cheese"). My knowledge of capitalisation in Basque is non-existent, but the name of the cheese should get a Basque entry at whichever is correct (similarly also French and German and possibly other languages, based on the b.g.c hits). The individual words should also get Basque entries if they haven't already (I haven't checked). Thryduulf 22:43, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

 * User:DcDuring has rectified --Volants 13:57, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:ardi gasna


text: mouchés

title: mouchés


text: mouchées

title: mouchées


text: mouchée

title: mouchée


text:
Talk:toerag

Is it possible that toerag is related the Irish word tóraidhe meaning "pursued man"? They sound alike...

 * I've heard it used as a frequent alternative to "Tory", as in conservative.

toeragger
toeragger is also found in some dictionaries, in the general insult sense; possibly Australian; not common. Equinox ◑ 21:51, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:toerag


text:
nanocolumnar

Adjective

 * 1) Having the form of a nanocolumn

title: nanocolumnar


text:
Մադհյա Պրադեշ

Proper noun

 * 1) Madhya Pradesh

title: Մադհյա Պրադեշ


text:
Talk:links

Discussion from WT:RFC
This is labelled "Scottish". Is it Scots or Scottish Gaelic? --EncycloPetey 16:17, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

 * 1) tagged Scots. --Volants 15:06, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

RFC discussion: June 2007
Tagged but not listed. --Connel MacKenzie 21:13, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

 * Cleaned up. —Stephen 22:44, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

RFC discussion: November 2007–January 2010
This is labelled "Scottish". Is it Scots or Scottish Gaelic? --EncycloPetey 16:17, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

 * 1) tagged Scots. --Volants 15:06, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

links laten liggen

 * Should this get an entry, or should we add a sense to the present entry? PUC – 15:58, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Deserves a separate entry imo, yeah. — Mnemosientje (t · c) 16:00, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Created it — Mnemosientje (t · c) 18:02, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:links


text:
Talk:lave

From WT:RFC
This is labelled "Scottish". Is it Scots or Scottish Gaelic? --EncycloPetey 16:17, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

 * 1) tagged Scots. --Volants 15:06, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

RFC discussion: November 2007–January 2010
This is labelled "Scottish". Is it Scots or Scottish Gaelic? --EncycloPetey 16:17, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

 * 1) tagged Scots. --Volants 15:06, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

English definition 6 quotation of McCarthy
I don't think the quotation from Cormac McCarthy belongs as an example of meaning 6, to wash. The context can be found on page 32 of the version on Google Books. Meaning 2 is perhaps the intended one here. We already have 2 quotations here, so perhaps this one should simply be removed? --Let's-ask-geoff (talk) 22:23, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

title: Talk:lave


text:
reconfigurability

Noun

 * 1) The state or degree of being reconfigurable.

title: reconfigurability


text:
Talk:swiftboating

From WT:RFC
Formatting, sources consist of "See Wikipedia article" (which, granted, has plenty of them for whoever cleans this entry up). Globish 02:42, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

 * 1) information moved to swiftboat --Volants 15:06, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

RFC discussion: November 2007–January 2010
Formatting, sources consist of "See Wikipedia article" (which, granted, has plenty of them for whoever cleans this entry up). Globish 02:42, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

 * 1) information moved to swiftboat --Volants 15:06, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

title: Talk:swiftboating


text:
revaluate

Verb

 * 1)  To make a new valuation or appraisal of.

title: revaluate


text: yuxtapusiere

title: yuxtapusiere


text: scotinos

title: scotinos


text:
subgap

Adjective

 * 1) Underneath a gap

title: subgap


text:
Talk:shiita

From WT:RFC
--Connel MacKenzie 23:08, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

 * I assume your objection is the second inflection line within the noun section. If we accept that each inflection line needs its own POS heading, the natural solution is to add a second ===Noun=== section.  You objected to that solution, though, in Wiktionary talk:About Spanish.  Could you please clarify your objection?  Navigation to non-English entries in general is limited to the language section.  That is, in an entry with the structure ==Portuguese==/===Noun===/==Spanish==/===Noun===, adding another ===Noun=== section to the ==Spanish== section wouldn't affect MediaWiki navigation at all, so what is your objection?  Rod (A. Smith) 00:04, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

 * The separate POS sections are supposed to be listed under separate ===Etymology === sections. --Connel MacKenzie 18:05, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

 * Not necessarily. Cleaned up by me --Volants 15:17, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

 * No, you've changed the meaning for the worse now. The point I was trying to convey with the two inflection lines is that this word refers to both the sect of Islam and a follower of that sect. When referring to followers of the sect, the word may be either masculine or feminine, but the sect sense is only feminine and not either, as combining the sections implies. Dominic·t 08:17, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

RFC discussion: December 2007–January 2010
--Connel MacKenzie 23:08, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

 * I assume your objection is the second inflection line within the noun section. If we accept that each inflection line needs its own POS heading, the natural solution is to add a second ===Noun=== section.  You objected to that solution, though, in Wiktionary talk:About Spanish.  Could you please clarify your objection?  Navigation to non-English entries in general is limited to the language section.  That is, in an entry with the structure ==Portuguese==/===Noun===/==Spanish==/===Noun===, adding another ===Noun=== section to the ==Spanish== section wouldn't affect MediaWiki navigation at all, so what is your objection?  Rod (A. Smith) 00:04, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

 * The separate POS sections are supposed to be listed under separate ===Etymology === sections. --Connel MacKenzie 18:05, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

 * Not necessarily. Cleaned up by me --Volants 15:17, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

title: Talk:shiita


text:
Talk:kilpa

from WT:RFC
A Finnish word meaning contest:, but it isn't clear whther this is a noun or verb. --EncycloPetey 03:03, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

 * It’s a noun. The verb would be kilpaa. —Stephen 07:05, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

 * User:Jyril has controlled this --Volants 15:17, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

RFC discussion: December 2007–January 2010
A Finnish word meaning contest:, but it isn't clear whther this is a noun or verb. --EncycloPetey 03:03, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

 * It’s a noun. The verb would be kilpaa. —Stephen 07:05, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

 * User:Jyril has controlled this --Volants 15:17, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

title: Talk:kilpa


text:
Talk:استأذن

from WT:RFC
No language header, needs formatting. --EncycloPetey 10:36, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

 * Done. —Stephen 13:14, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

RFC discussion: December 2007
No language header, needs formatting. --EncycloPetey 10:36, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

 * Done. —Stephen 13:14, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

title: Talk:استأذن


text:
Talk:osteoid

From WT:RFC
Presumably medical jargon, but it's encyclopedic and has no language header. --EncycloPetey 10:32, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Fixed. SemperBlotto 08:17, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

RFC discussion: December 2007
Presumably medical jargon, but it's encyclopedic and has no language header. --EncycloPetey 10:32, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Fixed. SemperBlotto 08:17, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

title: Talk:osteoid


text:
superseparability

Noun

 * 1)  The condition of being superseparable

title: superseparability


text: agregas

title: agregas


text:
superseparable

Adjective

 * 1)  separable in many different ways

title: superseparable


text:
thresholdless

Adjective

 * 1) Having no threshold

title: thresholdless


text: excluyese

title: excluyese


text:
-nomo

Etymology
From.

Suffix

 * 1) -nomer, -nomist (forms nouns relating to experts in a field)
 * 2) -noumous

title: -nomo


text:
Talk:flea pit

flea pit
Tagged, not listed ages ago. I agree - I've never heard this used in a way that restricts it to cinemas. --Connel MacKenzie 09:30, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Dictionaries have, though, fwiw. But is just one example of a use referring to a hotel. Simple cleanup: change the definition. Do we agree on so doing?—msh210 ℠ 19:40, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

 * Good citations have been added. Striked --Volants 15:38, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

title: Talk:flea pit


text:
Talk:fixed

fixed
Many of the senses are included in the first (past and participle of). Do we want to have (among those) only the first, or only the others? or double indents (##)? (If we keep the many senses, then we should add the math sense.) —msh210 ℠ 20:00, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Removed all senses given, all from verb. Added adjective with 3 senses. DCDuring TALK 11:58, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

 * Looks good. Striked --Volants 15:38, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

fixed oil
Chambers 1908 has an entry for fixed oils, "those which, on the application of heat, do not volatilise without decomposition". Is that SoP because of our sense here at fixed, "chemically stable", or not SoP? Equinox ◑ 03:31, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

title: Talk:fixed


text:
Talk:sportpony

sportpony
Reads more like a Wikipedia stub than a definition. Any equestrians here? --EncycloPetey 04:23, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

 * I'm no equestrian, but it's not clear that it's the right term. "Sport pony" gets more hits. I've left a message on the user's page and will follow up in a week. DCDuring TALK 02:33, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

 * Thanks DCDuring. This has been fixed --Volants 15:38, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

title: Talk:sportpony


text:
resjoir

Etymology
.

Verb

 * 1)  to take pleasure (from)

title: resjoir


text: Կալկաթա

title: Կալկաթա


text: concordes

title: concordes


text:
ciecale

Adjective

 * 1)  caecal

title: ciecale


text:
cifoscoliosi

Noun

 * 1)  kyphoscoliosis

title: cifoscoliosi


text: wears off

title: wears off


text:
cifotico

Adjective

 * 1) kyphotic

title: cifotico


text: wearing off

title: wearing off


text:
cifrista

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) coder, cipherer

title: cifrista


text:
cigliato

Adjective

 * 1) ciliate, ciliated

title: cigliato


text:
ciglione

Noun

 * 1) bank, embankment
 * 2) edge, brink, verge

title: ciglione


text:
Cigno

Etymology
See.

Proper noun

 * 1)  the Cygnus constellation

title: Cigno


text:
cilestrino

Adjective

 * 1)  pale blue

title: cilestrino


text: cilindrando

title: cilindrando


text: cilindrante

title: cilindrante


text: cilindrato

title: cilindrato


text: cilindrati

title: cilindrati


text:
cilindrare

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to steamroll, to roll flat (a road)
 * 2)  to calender (tin, rubber, etc.)

title: cilindrare


text:
cilindra

Adjective

 * 1)  cylindrical

Etymology
.

Verb

 * 1) to roll

title: cilindra


text: cilindriamo

title: cilindriamo


text: cilindrano

title: cilindrano


text:
Talk:alone

alone
Etymology questionable. Usage note on pronunciation seems encyclopedic. Adverb section seems wrong in part. DCDuring TALK 23:57, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Etymology section changed. Nadando 00:02, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Half of adverb section in RfD. Will hide verbose pronunciation note somewhow. DCDuring TALK 02:08, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

alone

 * 1) Of or by itself; by themselves; without any thing more or any one else; without a sharer; only.
 * 2) * Man shall not live by bread alone. —Luke iv. 4. Here, “bread alone” means bread and nothing else.
 * 3) Unique; without peer or equal:
 * 4) * Euclid alone has looked on Beauty bare. -- Edna St. Vincent Millay

Both senses seem worded as adjectives. Both usage examples seem to show postpositioned adjectival usage. Adjective section misses these senses, but wording seems so early-last-century. I hope the translators noticed the problem in their work. Needs to be moved. Brought here because translators complain about too may ttbcs and checktrans. DCDuring TALK 02:01, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. In "dough rises alone", the meaning is not immediately obvious that the bread rises by itself, even though alone is an adverb. Instead, we have a conception of a an isolated lump of dough that rises without anybody tending to it.
 * For the second definition, the counterexample "Euclid looks at Beauty alone", in construction similar to "Euclid looks at her often", makes that definition as an adverb farcical. VNNS 08:11, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Comment: has effected the deletion of these senses and kept their translation tables. —msh210℠ 16:54, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

closed, senses have been removed a while ago already. -- Prince Kassad 09:18, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Used after what it modifies.
HI, I've found the term postmodifier, which is quite wide, and postpositive. --Backinstadiums (talk) 16:38, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

after NP - adjective vs. adverb
re e.g. "The president alone has the key", it looks like this was originally classed as an adverbial use, but the RfD discussion above found it should be changed to adjective. I'd like to push back on that. alone's behaviour here is pretty unusual, and whether we class it as an adjective or an adverb, it's not going to have all the typical features of the part of speech. But I think the best argument for calling it an adverb is that adverbs perform much better than adjectives in a substitution test:

 * 1) The president alone has the key.
 * 2) The president {exclusively, solely, only} has the key.
 * 3) {exclusively, solely, only} the president has the key.
 * 4) * The president {sole, lone, one} has the key.
 * 5) The {sole, lone, one} president has the key.
 * 6) The power rests in the president alone.
 * 7) The power rests in the president {exclusively, solely, only}.
 * 8) The power rests in {exclusively, solely, only} the president.
 * 9) * The power rests in the president {sole, lone, one}.
 * 10) The power rests in the {sole, lone, one} president.

1.4 and 2.4 are grammatical but have completely different semantics ("there's only one president, and they have the key" - rather than "the president has the key and nobody else does"). I can't think of any other adjectives that could be used that would give rise to the original meaning.

All the adverb substitutions allow the original meaning, with 1.2 and 2.1 being the most natural. (1.1 is more likely to be read as "the president has the key and nothing else", especially with only. 2.2 is awkward at best, though, unlike 2.1, there's no ambiguity about whether the adverb attaches to the verb or the noun.)

Also, to be clear, modifying a NP does not automatically force the choice of adjective over adverb, per examples like:
 * 1) She ate almost the whole pizza.
 * 2) Mainly bats and dogs carry rabies.

But as with other syntactic oddities that are far from prototypical examples of any PoS, our choice of PoS header will be a minor contribution to the reader's understanding compared to the more important concerns of selecting good usage examples, organizing senses/subsenses well with appropriate labels, and usage notes. Colin M (talk) 14:32, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:alone


text: cilindravo

title: cilindravo


text: cilindravi

title: cilindravi


text: cilindrava

title: cilindrava


text: cilindravamo

title: cilindravamo


text: cilindravate

title: cilindravate


text: cilindravano

title: cilindravano


text: cilindrai

title: cilindrai


text: cilindrasti

title: cilindrasti


text: cilindrò

title: cilindrò


text: cilindrammo

title: cilindrammo


text: cilindraste

title: cilindraste


text: cilindrarono

title: cilindrarono


text: cilindrerò

title: cilindrerò


text: cilindrerai

title: cilindrerai


text: cilindrerà

title: cilindrerà


text: cilindreremo

title: cilindreremo


text: cilindrerete

title: cilindrerete


text: cilindreranno

title: cilindreranno


text: cilindrerei

title: cilindrerei


text: cilindreresti

title: cilindreresti


text:
բիշնուպրիյա-մանիպուրի

Proper noun

 * 1) Bishnupriya Manipuri

title: բիշնուպրիյա-մանիպուրի


text: cilindrerebbe

title: cilindrerebbe


text: cilindreremmo

title: cilindreremmo


text: cilindrereste

title: cilindrereste


text: cilindrerebbero

title: cilindrerebbero


text: cilindriate

title: cilindriate


text: cilindrino

title: cilindrino


text: cilindrassi

title: cilindrassi


text: cilindrasse

title: cilindrasse


text: cilindrassimo

title: cilindrassimo


text: cilindrassero

title: cilindrassero


text:
cilindratura

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) rolling
 * 2) calendering
 * 3) pressing

title: cilindratura


text:
Talk:Aedes aegypti

Cleanup debate
I suspect this is New Latin and should be moved to uppercase, and moved from to. Mglovesfun (talk) 15:40, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Done. SemperBlotto 15:50, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: It's not New Latin, it's Translingual. --EncycloPetey 22:21, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * We treat New Latin as translingual here. I don't think I've contradicted myself. Mglovesfun (talk) 13:59, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

title: Talk:Aedes aegypti


text:
Category talk:French contractions

Cleanup discussion
Do we just allow anything in this category? Any noun can starting with a vowel (or a mute h) uses the contracted forms l' and d'. How about qu'il and qu'elle? Que can also contract with anything starting with a vowel, but in some cases, doesn't have to, but can. Mglovesfun (talk) 22:36, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

 * Yes to the limited few with pronouns (such as qu'il and qu'elle), but not for the hundreds of thousands of nouns or adjectives except in idioms. Also yes for common verb forms such as c'est. —Stephen 16:29, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Archiving. Mglovesfun (talk) 14:02, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

There are useless items here, I'm gonna RFD them. --Barytonesis (talk) 14:48, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

title: Category talk:French contractions


text:
kilolumen

Noun

 * 1) A unit of luminous flux equal to one thousand lumens.
 * 2) * 1984-7, John E. Kaufman, Jack F. Christensen, (Illuminating Engineering Society of North America), IES lighting handbook: Volume 1984:
 * The entire east sky provided an equivalent exitance of 19 kilolumens per square meter (Method 1)

title: kilolumen


text:
Cajun French

Proper noun

 * 1) The dialect of the French language spoken in Louisiana, USA

title: Cajun French


text:
kapieren

Etymology
, at first in grammar school slang, 17th c. . Cognate with 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1)  to understand intellectually; to get; to grasp

title: kapieren


text: violentad

title: violentad


text:
rerattle

Verb

 * 1) to rattle again

title: rerattle


text:
rechime

Verb

 * 1)  to chime again

title: rechime


text:
gehe

Particle

 * 1) yes

title: gehe


text:
Talk:guerilla

Who?
Who precisely classifies this common misspelling as a valid alternative spelling?

Why not "guerila" too? It has the virtue of brevity.

It is brilliant that the talk page is not used as a talk page, when one considers that that is its function.
 * When I deleted it, there was no content on here apart from ==Who?==, which does not qualify as 'discussing'. Mglovesfun (talk) 14:54, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

 * Google hits: guerilla: 5,490,000 guerila: 122,000. SemperBlotto 14:57, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

 * I just wondered the same thing about narcoguerilla. Doesn't look right to me. Equinox ◑ 16:55, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:guerilla


text:
lanche

Etymology 1
Borrowed from, shortened form of.

Noun

 * 1) afternoon tea, high tea
 * 2) snack

title: lanche


text:
Template talk:de-verb form of

Discussion

 * Thanks for the documentation. How about for imperative? --Volants 14:59, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Instead of the person, just enter the letter i and omit the tense, this will mark the word as imperative. -- Prince Kassad 15:01, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Great. I'll use this --Volants 15:09, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The letters for the third parameter should better be in English rather than in German: this is a template to be used in English Wiktionary. So instead of g, v, k1, and k2, these should be pr, pa, s1, and s2, or something of the sort. --Dan Polansky 21:36, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The problem is that present and preterite begin with the same three letters. Two-letter abbreviations might have caused confusion with the parameters for past and present participle, which I wanted to avoid (I have learned from that chaos called ) -- Prince Kassad 21:42, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
 * There should be a solution that refers to English terms. A proposal: "pres" for "present", "pret" for "preterite", "sub1" for subjunctive 1, "sub2" for subjunctive 2. The convention pres = present and pret = preterite is already used by.
 * Model templates: and.
 * An example call:.
 * --Dan Polansky 10:53, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Which brings me to the observation that the name "de-verb form of" seems out of sync with names of other templates, and seems to indicate this is an inflection-line template, which it is not. "de-conjugation of" seems better to me.
 * I also wonder whether the template "conjugation of" could be extended to handle German instead of having a new German-specific template. The template "conjugation of" is used in Latin entries; I don't know whether it is used for other languages. --Dan Polansky 11:16, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
 * It fits with and, if you were wondering. -- Prince Kassad 16:14, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks; I did not know that. It is all right, then, with "de-verb form of", or it is no worse than the Spanish one. --Dan Polansky 21:32, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Dan makes a good point about putting the parameters in English. I don't think this template is very used, so if we changed it now, it would be easier. Maybe a robot can be summonned to make further changes in the entreis. I'll test something at Template:de-verb form of2. Comments welcome --Volants 13:22, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I have used the new template with sehe. --Volants 13:27, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

More suggested changes
Lemma word should be in bold and link directly to the German section, that's what a lot of form of templates do. Mglovesfun (talk) 20:11, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) ✅ -- Prince Kassad 20:23, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Subjunctive a tense?
This template's parameters are weird: Subjunctive is no tense, but a mood, and for some unknown reason there is no parameter for naming a form as indicative. --Abderitestatos (talk) 15:25, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, and "First-person singular present of ..." and "First-person singular subjunctive I of ..." make no sense. Is it the indicative or subjuntive/conjunctive present? Is it the present, perfect, future I or future II subjuntive I? Thus:

for the template

title: Template talk:de-verb form of


text:
temibilmente

Etymology
From.

Adverb

 * 1) formidably, frightfully

title: temibilmente


text:
perdibile

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) losable

title: perdibile


text: traïr

title: traïr


text:
infusibilità

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) infusibleness, infusibility

title: infusibilità


text: würde

title: würde


text:
cortoisie

Noun

 * 1) chivalry; bravery; valour

title: cortoisie


text:
predicibilità

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) predictability

title: predicibilità


text: Category:Old French terms suffixed with -ois


text:
ungreat

Etymology
From en. Cognate with 🇨🇬.

Adjective

 * 1) Not great.

title: ungreat


text:
stíga í vænginn

Verb

 * 1)  to make a pass at, to try to win the love of, to woo

Usage notes

 * Often used with the preposition in which case it governs the accusative case.

title: stíga í vænginn


text:
inesaudibile

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) that can not be granted

title: inesaudibile


text:
deglobalizzazione

Noun

 * 1) deglobalization

title: deglobalizzazione


text:
korporace

Noun

 * 1) corporation business entity

Related terms

 * See

title: korporace


text:
deglobalizzare

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to deglobalize

title: deglobalizzare


text: nehmend

title: nehmend


text:
jetable

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) disposable designed to be thrown away after use

title: jetable


text: jetables

title: jetables


text: genommen

title: genommen


text: nehme

title: nehme


text: nimmst

title: nimmst


text: nehmt

title: nehmt


text: nimm

title: nimm


text: nahmst

title: nahmst


text:
Jehan Baptiste

Proper noun

 * 1) John the Baptist

title: Jehan Baptiste


text: nahmen

title: nahmen


text: nahmt

title: nahmt


text: nehmest

title: nehmest


text: nehmet

title: nehmet


text:
globalismo

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) globalism

Noun

 * 1) globalism

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) globalism

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) globalism

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) globalism

title: globalismo


text: nähme

title: nähme


text: nähmest

title: nähmest


text: nähmen

title: nähmen


text: nähmet

title: nähmet


text: geter

title: geter


text:
Talk:geter

Wikisource shows that this definitely exists, but could it be an alternative spelling of as well, or instead? Mglovesfun (talk) 15:36, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Not seeing it for 'gaitier' anywhere, you can have gueter, gaitier, waiter, etc. but not seeing anything starting get. Renard Migrant (talk) 13:56, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:geter


text: puntease

title: puntease


text:
enseler

Verb

 * 1) to saddle put a saddle on an animal

title: enseler


text: Category:Old French terms prefixed with en-


text:
unbiddenly

Etymology
From.

Adverb

 * 1) Without having been asked or invited.

title: unbiddenly


text:
requerre

Etymology
From, or from , present active infinitive of.

Verb

 * 1) to ask
 * 2) to demand, require
 * 3) to search; to look for
 * 4) to attack

title: requerre


text: park light

title: park light


text: park lights

title: park lights


text: cevals

title: cevals


text: chevax

title: chevax


text: chevals

title: chevals


text: sobregirase

title: sobregirase


text:
Löwchen

Etymology
Borrowed from.

Noun

 * 1) An uncommon bichon bred in North-Western Europe.

Synonyms

 * Little Lion Dog

Translations

 * Czech:
 * Dutch: Leeuwhondje
 * Finnish: löwchen, pienileijonakoira
 * French:
 * German: Löwchen
 * Hungarian: kis oroszlánkutya
 * Icelandic: litli ljónahundur
 * Indonesian: anjing singa kecil
 * Italian: piccolo cane leone
 * Lithuanian: šuo liūtukas
 * Malay: anjing singa kecil
 * Polish: lwi piesek
 * Portuguese: pequeno cão leão
 * Russian: малая львиная соба́ка
 * Serbo-Croatian: mali lavlji pas
 * Slovak: levíček
 * Slovene: levček
 * Spanish: pequeño perro león
 * Swedish: loöwchen

Noun

 * 1) Löwchen dog
 * 1) Löwchen dog

title: Löwchen


text: empuñad

title: empuñad


text:
albescent

Etymology
18th century. From, present participle of , from

Adjective

 * 1) Becoming white or whitish; moderately white.
 * 2) * 2002,, The Velocity Gospel, Scar Garden 2010 (Complete Accomplice), p. 180:
 * Albescent shapes played over the walls, teasing hundreds of drifty pleasures from his brain.
 * Albescent shapes played over the walls, teasing hundreds of drifty pleasures from his brain.

Related terms

 * albescence

Translations

 * Portuguese: albescente

title: albescent


text: desagradecería

title: desagradecería


text: presupuestos

title: presupuestos


text:
-oide

Etymology
, compound of +, from.

Suffix

 * 1) -oid

Etymology
Borrowed from, , , /, , all ultimately from , , from.

Suffix

 * 1) ; -oid

Etymology
From, compound of + , from.

Suffix

 * 1) -oid (both nouns and adjectives)

Etymology
, compound of +, from.

Suffix

 * 1) -oid

Etymology
From.

Suffix

 * 1) -oid

title: -oide


text:
frondescent

Etymology
From, present participle of , from , from.

Adjective

 * 1) Leafy; becoming leafy; resembling leaves.

title: frondescent


text: guiñaseis

title: guiñaseis


text:
User:Raaves69

RAAVES69

title: User:Raaves69


text: carbonizas

title: carbonizas


text: carbonizase

title: carbonizase


text:
tronchon

Noun

 * 1) baton; truncheon

title: tronchon


text:
adenoidi

Etymology
<

title: adenoidi


text:
frutescent

Etymology
About 1750, from.

Adjective

 * 1) Imperfectly resembling a shrub.

Etymology
.

Etymology
.

title: frutescent


text:
Citations:tronchon

 * With their truncheons high above their heads,
 * They attacked each other with their swords.

title: Citations:tronchon


text:
rufescent

Etymology
Circa 1820, from, present participle of , from.

Adjective

 * 1) Becoming reddish; tinged with red.

title: rufescent


text:
suffrutescent

Adjective

 * 1)  Slightly woody or shrubby at the base.

title: suffrutescent


text:
Talk:deireadh

Pronunciation request
how do you pronounce it
 * I've added pronunciation info. —Angr 10:00, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:deireadh


text:
comunistoide

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) commie, red

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) commie, red, pinko

title: comunistoide