text: adujaras

title: adujaras


text: adujare

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: adujare


text: adujareis

title: adujareis


text: adujaremos

title: adujaremos


text: adujaren

title: adujaren


text:
слонёнок

Noun

 * 1) elephant calf, baby elephant

title: слонёнок


text: adujares

title: adujares


text: adujaron

title: adujaron


text: adujará

title: adujará


text: adujarán

title: adujarán


text: adujarás

title: adujarás


text: adujaré

title: adujaré


text: adujaréis

title: adujaréis


text: adujaría

title: adujaría


text: adujaríais

title: adujaríais


text: adujaríamos

title: adujaríamos


text: adujarían

title: adujarían


text: adujarías

title: adujarías


text: adujas

title: adujas


text:
тюленёнок

Noun

 * 1) seal calf, baby seal

title: тюленёнок


text: adujase

title: adujase


text: adujaseis

title: adujaseis


text: adujasen

title: adujasen


text: adujases

title: adujases


text: adujaste

title: adujaste


text: adujasteis

title: adujasteis


text: aduje

title: aduje


text: adujemos

title: adujemos


text: adujen

title: adujen


text: adujes

title: adujes


text: adujo

title: adujo


text: adujábamos

title: adujábamos


text: adujáis

title: adujáis


text: adujáramos

title: adujáramos


text: adujáremos

title: adujáremos


text: adujásemos

title: adujásemos


text: adujéis

title: adujéis


text: adujó

title: adujó


text: adecúa

title: adecúa


text: adecúan

title: adecúan


text: adecúas

title: adecúas


text: adecúe

title: adecúe


text: adecúen

title: adecúen


text: adecúes

title: adecúes


text: adecúo

title: adecúo


text:
kökukefli

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) rolling pin

title: kökukefli


text: denostaba

title: denostaba


text: denostabais

title: denostabais


text: denostaban

title: denostaban


text: denostabas

title: denostabas


text: denostad

title: denostad


text: denostado

title: denostado


text: denostamos

title: denostamos


text: denostando

title: denostando


text: denostara

title: denostara


text: denostarais

title: denostarais


text: denostaran

title: denostaran


text: denostaras

title: denostaras


text: denostare

title: denostare


text: denostareis

title: denostareis


text: denostaremos

title: denostaremos


text: denostaren

title: denostaren


text: denostares

title: denostares


text: denostaron

title: denostaron


text: denostará

title: denostará


text: denostarán

title: denostarán


text: denostarás

title: denostarás


text: denostaré

title: denostaré


text: denostaréis

title: denostaréis


text: denostaría

title: denostaría


text: denostaríais

title: denostaríais


text: denostaríamos

title: denostaríamos


text: denostarían

title: denostarían


text: denostarías

title: denostarías


text: denostase

title: denostase


text: denostaseis

title: denostaseis


text: denostasen

title: denostasen


text: denostases

title: denostases


text: denostaste

title: denostaste


text: denostasteis

title: denostasteis


text:
badge bunny

Etymology

 * is used in combination to refer to female groupies.
 * is used in combination to refer to female groupies.

Noun

 * 1)  A woman who is romantically attracted to police officers and who seeks out their companionship.

title: badge bunny


text: denostemos

title: denostemos


text: denostábamos

title: denostábamos


text: denostáis

title: denostáis


text: polyandries

title: polyandries


text: denostáramos

title: denostáramos


text: denostáremos

title: denostáremos


text: badge bunnies

title: badge bunnies


text: denostásemos

title: denostásemos


text: denosté

title: denosté


text: denostéis

title: denostéis


text: denostó

title: denostó


text: denuesta

title: denuesta


text: denuestan

title: denuestan


text: denuestas

title: denuestas


text: denueste

title: denueste


text: denuesten

title: denuesten


text: denuestes

title: denuestes


text: palaeosalinities

title: palaeosalinities


text:
denuesto

Etymology 1
.

Noun

 * 1) insult

title: denuesto


text: palaeoequators

title: palaeoequators


text: text files

title: text files


text: argument forms

title: argument forms


text: proton numbers

title: proton numbers


text: bolometric magnitudes

title: bolometric magnitudes


text: alpha channels

title: alpha channels


text: base hits

title: base hits


text: spontaneous generations

title: spontaneous generations


text: double boilers

title: double boilers


text: cognitive sciences

title: cognitive sciences


text: monophyletic groups

title: monophyletic groups


text: command line interfaces

title: command line interfaces


text: kernelizations

title: kernelizations


text: conventional wars

title: conventional wars


text: electromagnetic units

title: electromagnetic units


text: dairy products

title: dairy products


text: disk drives

title: disk drives


text: discus throwers

title: discus throwers


text: electric guitars

title: electric guitars


text: fixed disks

title: fixed disks


text: tape drives

title: tape drives


text: cassette drives

title: cassette drives


text: floppy disk drives

title: floppy disk drives


text: home schools

title: home schools


text: brake horsepowers

title: brake horsepowers


text: film crews

title: film crews


text: bomber jackets

title: bomber jackets


text: figure skaters

title: figure skaters


text: file types

title: file types


text: graffiti artists

title: graffiti artists


text: dynamometer cars

title: dynamometer cars


text: tin sandwiches

title: tin sandwiches


text: exercise machines

title: exercise machines


text: jet engines

title: jet engines


text: legacy systems

title: legacy systems


text: mental illnesses

title: mental illnesses


text: magnetic tapes

title: magnetic tapes


text:
Rhymes:Icelandic/ɛplɪ

Two syllables

 * efli
 * defli
 * grefli
 * hefli
 * Hnefli
 * kefli
 * refli
 * skefli
 * snefli
 * tefli
 * trefli

title: Rhymes:Icelandic/ɛplɪ


text: petrol bombs

title: petrol bombs


text: network externalities

title: network externalities


text: network effects

title: network effects


text: chamber orchestras

title: chamber orchestras


text: upright pianos

title: upright pianos


text: physical quantities

title: physical quantities


text: golden means

title: golden means


text: pulse detonation engines

title: pulse detonation engines


text: piston engines

title: piston engines


text: rotary engines

title: rotary engines


text: application programs

title: application programs


text: computer programs

title: computer programs


text: combustion chambers

title: combustion chambers


text: oxidizing agents

title: oxidizing agents


text: reducing agents

title: reducing agents


text: Rhymes:Icelandic/ɛðrɪ

title: Rhymes:Icelandic/ɛðrɪ


text: physical sciences

title: physical sciences


text: personal properties

title: personal properties


text: phone cards

title: phone cards


text: telephone cards

title: telephone cards


text: radix sorts

title: radix sorts


text: piezoelectric effects

title: piezoelectric effects


text: statistical inferences

title: statistical inferences


text: random samples

title: random samples


text: bottleneck guitars

title: bottleneck guitars


text: slide guitars

title: slide guitars


text: short short stories

title: short short stories


text: short-short stories

title: short-short stories


text: space explorations

title: space explorations


text: scuba sets

title: scuba sets


text: snuff movies

title: snuff movies


text: totally ordered sets

title: totally ordered sets


text: trust funds

title: trust funds


text: continuous variables

title: continuous variables


text: wireless networks

title: wireless networks


text: waterfall models

title: waterfall models


text: brain tumors

title: brain tumors


text: substantive adjectives

title: substantive adjectives


text: natural sciences

title: natural sciences


text: calling cards

title: calling cards


text: piezoresistive effects

title: piezoresistive effects


text: firefoxes

title: firefoxes


text: red giants

title: red giants


text: red supergiants

title: red supergiants


text: scuba divers

title: scuba divers


text: snuff films

title: snuff films


text: total orders

title: total orders


text: discrete variables

title: discrete variables


text: formal sciences

title: formal sciences


text: visiting cards

title: visiting cards


text: business cards

title: business cards


text: red foxes

title: red foxes


text: blue foxes

title: blue foxes


text: total ordering relations

title: total ordering relations


text: partial orders

title: partial orders


text: information sciences

title: information sciences


text:
stofupíanó

Etymology
From +.

Noun

 * 1) upright piano

title: stofupíanó


text: partial ordering relations

title: partial ordering relations


text: partially ordered sets

title: partially ordered sets


text: library sciences

title: library sciences


text: archival sciences

title: archival sciences


text: autism spectrum disorders

title: autism spectrum disorders


text: pervasive developmental disorders

title: pervasive developmental disorders


text: 11-plus examinations

title: 11-plus examinations


text: 1-2-3 blocks

title: 1-2-3 blocks


text: 2-4-6 blocks

title: 2-4-6 blocks


text: 419 frauds

title: 419 frauds


text: unsaturated fatty acids

title: unsaturated fatty acids


text:
cooze

Etymology
, but compare 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, vernacular 🇨🇬, and 🇨🇬. The term may have been introduced to the United States after the Second World War by servicemen who fought in north Africa, but it already existed as a slang term in the blues community as early as 1929.

Noun

 * 1)  Pussy, vagina.
 * 2)  A woman.
 * 1)  A woman.
 * 1)  A woman.
 * 1)  A woman.

title: cooze


text: hydrogen bonds

title: hydrogen bonds


text: hydrogen bonding

title: hydrogen bonding


text: hydrogen bonded

title: hydrogen bonded


text: complex ions

title: complex ions


text: polar covalent bonds

title: polar covalent bonds


text:
nútími

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) the modern age
 * 2)  the Holocene epoch

title: nútími


title: 18-wheelers


text: 360 backflips

title: 360 backflips


text: Bali tigers

title: Bali tigers


text: Bo Diddley beats

title: Bo Diddley beats


text: Dotto trains

title: Dotto trains


text: Dorothy bags

title: Dorothy bags


text: Dressler's syndromes

title: Dressler's syndromes


text:
Talk:Jesuses

Please, do not erase the note about intentional incorrectness. There are no nouns in English ending in -us whose origin is Latin and which could swerve from the rules in Latin for forming plurals (campi is non-standard, but it must be the only exception). This one is fourth declination, which means that the plural must be (hypothetically) Jesus as well. It is not only a religious blasphemy, but also a product of glaring ignorance of the rules for forming plurals. Bogorm 21:03, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * It is very clear from the citations that none of these authors intends for the word to be incorrect. It is also the case that a knowledge of Latin is not necessary for speaking correct English.  Besides, the name is not originally Latin, but Greek, and before that Hebrew.  Should we consult these grammars as well?  Wiktionary is here to record which words are used and how.  Very clearly, ‘Jesuses’ is not intended to be incorrect or offensive, and nor would most people consider it either of those things.  Ƿidsiþ 21:24, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Most sæcular people or members of other confessions. We are speaking about the ignominious effect this botched up form evokes in devout Orthodox or Catholics and I assure you that it evokes such effect in me as well. As for Latin, it is the immediate source for the English word. As a conclusion, all quotations are not only sacrilegious, but ignorant as well. I consider the expurgation of the usage notes ineffably lamentable. Bogorm 21:33, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

 * Though I am not religious, I am surprised that you consider this (or any word) sacreligious in itself. When the word is used it tends to be as part of a rhetorical device, rather than actually implying that there are or were literally lots of individual Jesus Christs.  So I am confused about what aspect of Christian scripture or practice this is felt to violate.  If you can show that it is genuinely regarded as an offensive term though, a Usage Note would probably be desirable.  Ƿidsiþ 21:40, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * We already have had... a usage note. This is a commonly misunderstood thing, it also came up recently on Talk:epithet. We should probably make a page somewhere titled, "Words don't offend people; people do." :) 21:45, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Requests for deletion - kept
Kept. 01:01, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Copy of archived discussion
 * Note: see also Votes/pl-2008-06/Plurals of proper nouns.

OK User:EncycloPetey is pulling all kinds of bullshit excuses to try to keep this deleted without discussion. If the community intends to screw over its readership let's have some real debate to show them. Kappa 23:17, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
 * If you look at my talk page, you'll see there was discussion. It is you who insisted on overturning a deletion without discussion or indeed even looking at the discussion that had happened.  Your attitude and language are very unbecoming.  Please play nice.  I have started a formal discussion below. --EncycloPetey 23:31, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
 * OK I'm sorry I didn't realize you were having a secret discussion, perhaps because it wasn't advertised. Kappa 23:36, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
 * This is a WIKI. Discussions posted on pages are not secret.  The problem is that you didn't look, jumped to conclusions, and proceded to make accusations and use profanity.  At what point in this process did I cause you to go astray? --EncycloPetey 23:40, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
 * ... where was I supposed to look? Kappa 23:43, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
 * If you knew I deleted it, then why not see my talk page? --EncycloPetey 23:48, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

 * I have waited on this to let my anger subside. Why was it OK to delete this outside of RfD/RfV? I do not believe that a discussion which someone is supposed to find if they happen to notice the deletion is in any way a substitute for the public one. DCDuring TALK 19:39, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

 * Administrators have to do this all the time. Not everything which is deleted is brought to rfv/d, nor could it be.  If it were, the pages would cease to function, being overwhelmed with junk.  People who make a habit of patrolling (as EP does), have to rely on their own judgment to decide what is obvious crap and what is more controversial.  There are many difficult decisions, but a good general rule is that if a word is in someway contrary to general convention (as Jesuses is), then it can be deleted on sight.  Inclusion of this entry requires a large-scale change to how we do proper nouns on Wiktionary.  I'm fairly ambivalent as to what happens, but it's certainly a change.  EP was completely in the right on this one.  -Atelaes λάλει ἐμοί 20:05, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

 * I know. I delete items that fall within the various categories that we have for expeditious deletion. Anything that I think might be controversial I put on RfV/RfD. I try to not substitute my own prejudices and preferences no matter how superior they may be by dint of my credentials, training, experience, and expertise. I strongly disagree that "someway contrary to general convention" is adequate if it leads to this result. Obviously we have numerous problems with conflict among rules. Our "unwritten rules" ought to have little force. If we cannot write a specific rule that gains community acceptance, then there is no community acceptance and more general rules, principles and process apply. An entry such as this that can be readily cited and is a word but conflicts with some "unwritten rule" which contradicts the capabilities of the applicable template (pl parameter) and WT:CFI. It is precisely because the judgment of even our most veteran contributors is not to be trusted that we need to respect the process. The substitution of insider judgment for a more transparent process is what puts Wiktionary in a questionable position in its handling of newbie contributions. DCDuring TALK 20:51, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

 * If we do not allow our veteran contributors to use their judgment, then patrolling becomes an impossible task. It is not perfect, as we often like to overturn previous conventions, but it is the best method we've got so far.  For every deleted entry that perhaps should have been left, a hundred that should not waste the community's time get deleted (without wasting the community's time).  Without the judgment of veteran contributors, we become Urban Dictionary.  I think it a bad idea to criticize an admin for engaging in the difficult and arduous task of patrolling, and failing to conceive of every possible consideration for an entry.  If we want to keep edits patrolled, we need to be a bit more forgiving of those rare individuals who actually do so (like EP and SB).  Because I'll be honest, I hate patrolling, and while I force myself to do it on occasion, I certainly don't do enough of it to keep our incoming edits under control.  -Atelaes λάλει ἐμοί 21:11, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

 * Indulging one's prejudices should not be a reward for patrolling. Frankly, I believe that letting a few arguable cases through is not a waste of time for those who do not patrol. I believe that I have detected a greater tendency to submit some such cases to RfD/RfV and I appreciate that. DCDuring TALK 22:43, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

 * For the record, there are no rewards for patrolling, only aches and pains. --EncycloPetey 23:30, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

 * Like this, I assume. Patrolling is just supposed to keep the vandals under control, not necessarily enforce unenforceably complex rules. DCDuring TALK 23:46, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

 * Patrolling is supposed to make Wiktionary better. Mostly it does consist of deleting ten "Haha, lolzzZZZ" pages in a row, sometimes in consist of purging protologisms, blatant or otherwise, other times it is just a case of keeping things neat and tidy. Anyone has the right to act to improve Wiktionary. If there is no community decision on an issue, then anyone can make up the rules as they go along (otherwise we'd be overwhelmed with borderline cases). If people disagree with your decisions then the rules come under discussion and get changed, otherwise the made up rules get adopted by others and a consensus is formed. You may disagree with people's decision (that's fine, if everyone agrees then boredom ensues) but you have to give everyone the chance to decide for themselves. Conrad.Irwin 00:27, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
 * OK there seems to be support for the idea that borderline, controversial cases should be deleted without public discussion instead of brought to a forum such as this one. I would like it explained to me (1) why someone on the receiving end of this kind of behavior would not simply leave the project or become a vandal. Why would this not be an entirely appropriate response? and (2) why should the rest of the community not get a chance to voice their opinion? Kappa 18:00, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Not at all, borderline cases should be brought for discussion. The problem lies in distinguishing borderline from not-borderline. i.e. the borderline borderline cases. (1) If they disagree they can (and, from experience, do) ask about it. (2) The rest of the community does get the chance to voice their opinion, hence this extensive discussion. As our patrollers in general do a very good job, for no reward except being moaned at by disgruntled spammers, or picked on by outraged Wiktionarians, I don't think there is any problem in the way things are done. Yes, people have different opinions; No, that isn't a problem. Conrad.Irwin 18:20, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

AEL Jesuses
You can say "There were two Julius Caesars, a public Julius Caesar and a private Julius Caesar." When you do this, you "split" the proper noun into two common noun aspects. This means that you are no longer using a proper noun, so the grammar of a proper noun is gone. Normally, a proper noun like Julius Caesar cannot take an article like a:, but you can see in the hypothetical situation above, the indefinite article is used. This phenomenon applies to all proper nouns (except those that have an inherently plural form like Alps). The examples I listed above all return citations from Google Books: "A student of Ireland can find three different Irelands..."; "The Three Romes"; etc.

I propose we forbid all "plurals" of proper nouns. This includes "plurals" of countries like Englands, Irelands, Chinas; of cities like Romes, Berlins, Londons; of personal names like Jorges, Anitas, Pauls; and all other such "plurals". I feel the arguments run along the same lines as those we used to forbid the inclusion of all the possessives. Including these should not be allowed any more than the possessive forms, which we specifically voted to exclude.

The alternative is madness. For every Proper noun, we would have a new common Noun section with a definition like this: Rome - Any hypothetical aspect of the city of Rome, whether regional, historical, or cultural. Does the commmunity would want to add a whole section under a Noun header to each and every English Proper noun in the language? --EncycloPetey 23:29, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

 * We do it for all plural forms of all other nouns, why make an exception for proper nouns? Conrad.Irwin 23:31, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

 * Re-read the discussion above. (1) Proper nouns don't have plurals. (2) Every singular of these "plurals" will have identical definitions. (3) See the discussion on excluding possessives.  For (3), note especially the comments about how the -'s attaches to a phrase, which is true of the "plurals" of proper nouns as well. (e.g. Trinidad and Tobagos) --EncycloPetey 23:35, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

 * EncycloPetey, would one really say two Juliuses Caesars or two Julii Caesares? I mean, the word comes from Latin and those English words which præserved the Latin suffix, usually are declined with respect to Latin rules for forming plurals. Why would Julius Caesar be an exception? Bogorm 21:49, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

 * You might as well say it's madness to include plurals of common nouns! Personally it's never been my understanding of proper nouns that they cannot have plural forms. But even if that is the case, that is a problem with our classification system rather than with the words themselves. Manifestly, Jesuses and other similar plurals are in use, and therefore clearly we should have entries for them if they are attested. Why on earth not? All the entries need is a simple . Widsith 23:35, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

 * Proper nouns don't have plurals; only the common noun aspect of a proper noun has a plural. The plural is never a proper noun because it is not a name but a class.  Further, all the possessives would need is a "possessive of", right?  Yet, we voted to eclude those; we should do the same here. --EncycloPetey 23:36, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

 * The word exists. Whether you call it proper or common is neither here nor there.  Widsith 23:38, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

 * The problem is that it is both here and there. If we have entries all over Wiktionary identifying words as "plural of" something else, and the something else is marked as a different part of speech, the general internet community will think we're nuts (OK, they probably think that already, but why add fuel to the fire). If we add these "plurals", then logically we also need to go through and add all the common Noun snese of these words.  Consider: "There's not a London like that anymore."  We don't have an entry with a definition that will fit this sentence, because we don't deal in the common noun aspect of Proper nouns. All proper nouns have such an aspect, and it's part of standard English grammar that they can be used hypothetically like this.  Any entry and definition would have to have extensive Usage notes and examples to keep people from becoming hopelessly confused.

 * Further, lots of words exist that we exclude. Existence of a word does not mean we will include it. We exclude protologisms, possessives, many brand names, names of specific individuals, and many more besides.  --EncycloPetey 23:41, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Prolotogisms aren't words. The justification for deleting English possessives is that they are not actually words, but words plus a clitic. We have a test for whether or not a brand name can be considered part of the language. Kappa 23:47, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
 * The thread of this particular line is that we do exclude some words. Can you agree that existence of a word is not automatic cause for inclusion?  That is the point I was making just above.

 * If you note in the other thread above, the "plurals" of proper nouns are formed exactly as the possessives. A suffix is added to a complete phrase functioning as a proper noun. --EncycloPetey 23:49, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

 * suffix != clitic. Thryduulf 00:33, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Wiktionary aims to be descriptive not prescriptive, so why not just say that proper nouns can be used uncountably to describe a specific person, place or thing, or countably in the singular or plural to describe aspects of a specific person, place or thing or multiple specific people, places or things with the same name? Why must we be hidebound by traditional grammars if they do not describe what we observe? Thryduulf 00:33, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

 * Because that would be misleading rather than descriptive. "Proper noun" implies a number of grammatical properties of a word.  The "plural" of a proper noun never exhibits those properties; it exibits the properties of a common noun.  More importantly, the singular of that plural is also a common noun.  If I say "The apostles of Christ included two Jameses, I do not mean that there were two "male given names".  I mean there were two "people bearing the name James".  This is akin to the use-mention distinction.  When James is used to refer to a specific individual, it is a proper noun. However, when it refers not to a specific individual, but to one of a class of such items, then it is a common noun, as in: "Is there a James here?"  Notice that in this example, we have an indefinite article preceding the word James, which is contrary to use as a proper noun.  It also does not refer to a specific individual, but one of a class, much as: "Is there a doctor here?"  If we include the "plurals" of proper nouns, then we have to include, for every given name, the common noun sense of "an individual bearing this name". --EncycloPetey 00:41, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Are we really sure that we want an across-the-board prohibition? Also, would we not want to provide some indication of how a plural might be formed for an entry we call a "Proper noun", especially if it is not by mere addition of "s". For surnames, for example, the plural is very natural and common: "Let's invite the Smiths over for dinner." How would you say that for the "Jones" or "Johns" family? Because we do not have a very effective and accessible presentation of the grammatical "rules" of English, I don't really see how we can rely on those "rules" to make up for entries that are not present or information not present in the entries. It is not as if all grammar texts have identical definitions of "proper nouns". It is even less likely that the senses in the entries we have characterized as "Proper noun" would really meet many of the definitions of "Proper noun". DCDuring TALK 00:39, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

 * We went through this same discussion for the possessives and decided not to include them. I have begun an appendix explaining grammar of English proper nouns, but it will need much more work before it is complete.  I have not had a suitably long block of time to focus on writing it, since, as you have noted, it is a difficult topic and most grammars I've examined casually skim over the subject without addressing it. --EncycloPetey 00:41, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

 * I gotta say EP, that's pretty phat. I look forward to seeing it in the appendix namespace.  -Atelaes λάλει ἐμοί 00:48, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

 * I think something which should be borne in mind here is the frequency. Common nouns are commonly used in the plural, while proper nouns are only rarely used in plural, and in an obscure function. I see zero difference between this and the possessive forms. It is still a bound morpheme attached by normal rules. You can argue 'til you're blue in the face that this is a clitic or whatever, but it's still a suffix of some type which attaches to nouns (and phrases) in a determined fashion. Now, I don't have much of a problem with including possessive forms, nor do I have a problem with including these common plural forms of proper nouns. However, as EP duly notes, this is a lot of work for little gain. Also, I think that each such form should be subject to rfv, as it is an odd form. Additionally, DCDuring makes an excellent point that we lack good grammar appendices, certainly a current shortcoming of our project. -Atelaes λάλει ἐμοί 00:43, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Comment. EP raises good points, but I'm not convinced. Since indeed every proper noun can be used as a common noun, I don't think it's necessary to include a separate "Noun" section at every proper-noun entry, because an English-speaking reader will see the "Proper noun" section and know what do make of it; however, plurals are different, since you can't visit [[Chinas]] and see a "Proper noun" section. However, I'm not going to vote "keep", because I think that neither Jesus: nor Jesuses: meets WT:CFI, and while I don't really mind making a few exceptions, I certainly won't vote to. —Ruakh TALK 02:45, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

 * The word obviously exists. We aim to include ALL words. Therefore we should keep it. I notice the in Mary, for example, it is defined as a Proper noun, then is used to generate the headword. That seems a reasonable compromise to me. SemperBlotto 06:57, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

 * So, you want to label it on the entry as a "Poper noun", but categorize it as a common noun? Or are you proposing dual categorization for every proper noun? --EncycloPetey 13:40, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

 * The last time I looked allowed a pl= parameter. DCDuring TALK 18:44, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

 * It also allows uncountable, but I cannot think of a single Proper noun that is uncountable. For the typical proper noun, the count is "one". --EncycloPetey 21:44, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

delete - and writing a grammar appendix is a very good idea. Hekaheka 17:22, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

 * keep as it is commonly used in such usages as "The square in front of the shrine had many vendors selling plastic Jesuses." not so rare, as can be seen from this b.g.c. search. I also agree with Ruakh's point about the need to maintain access via entry of the plural.
 * Also:
 * The plural needs to be indicated in the lemma entry.
 * Further, I would suggest that the RfV process is the means for removing spurious plurals, when as and if they occur.
 * Most of the "rare" plural forms of proper nouns are much less rare than many of our other entries, including many not marked with rare tags.
 * The existence of rules that we can effectively render comprehensible and accessible for our normal users, which would truly substitute for the plural entries, has not been established. DCDuring TALK 18:37, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Simplest would be to apply the normal CFI, three independent durably archived citations spanning three years. Jesuses meets this trivially, as do many people's names. Some town and city names do not meet this, and it seems dependent on the size of such places - seems to me to be a reasonable metric. Conrad.Irwin 18:43, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

 * If we apply "the normal CFI", as you call them, to Jesuses:, but the actual CFI to Jesus:, then we'd keep only the former. Are you sure that's a good idea? —Ruakh <i >TALK</i > 19:16, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

 * As I haven't read through the CFI in a long time, I just remember the "three independent durably archived three year-spanning cites", If we are looking for that then there is no question that Jesuses would be includable (see google books). But, if there's something else that I've forgotten please correct me. Conrad.Irwin 19:24, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

 * Perhaps we should also be considering uncountable nouns like alfalfa. These follow a similar pattern, whereby they normally do not take a plural, but can in certain contexts.  -Atelaes λάλει ἐμοί 21:48, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

 * One of my personal hobby horses is uncountability. "alfalfas" would be readily attestable in agricultural literature. DCDuring <i >TALK</i > 22:46, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

 * Oh, definitely. I wasn't saying anything to the contrary.  However, we really ought to come up with a nice way of noting such things.  Because nearly every common noun could have a sense of "a type of xxxx", and yet it seems a bit redundant to note that in every single definition, just as it seems kind of dumb to include an abstract common noun sense for each and every single proper noun.  -Atelaes λάλει ἐμοί 22:50, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

 * I wonder whether the default views of Wiktionary for non-registered users shouldn't have with all kinds of grammar lessons and extensive display of the obvious through templated text and links. Registered users should get a choice of views that reflect what they think they know. Adepts could get a more fine-grained choice like WT:PREFS. Getting rid of the obvious would be a reward for registering and signing in. I don't know what the software prospects are for that degree of control, but a good number of our presentation concerns derive from the broad range of capabilities of our users. I don't entirely believe that Simple is going to fully address the needs of a very broad range of users, as useful as their efforts seem to be. If we had some sense for the realistic time-frame for that degree of customization, we could resolve many of these disputes much more easily. If there is no time-frame, then the disputes are essentially about who the target user is and what capabilities we can assume, all in the absence of any real facts. The current situation gives personal tastes of contributors excessive weight relative to the needs of users. I don't know to what extent this leads us to have something like 1/60th the visits that WP has, but I'd be surprised if it didn't make a contribution. DCDuring <i >TALK</i > 00:07, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

 * Just a couple of extra comments for this already huge debate. 1 – Users shouldn't be expected to know that "proper nouns can't have plurals" – they see a word like this, they're entitled to look it up.  How we classify it is our own, secondary, problem.  2 – I totally understand EP's position and I take the point about similarity with possessives.  For me the simple difference is that the apostrophe in possessives makes it more obvious that we are dealing with two distinct lexemes, whereas with plurals there's no obvious clue.  However, if it came to it I'd rather keep both than exclude this.  3 – Even if in general such plurals are discouraged, arguably Jesuses (and some others) is a special case, because "Jesus" = "artistic representation of Jesus" is so incredibly common in art contexts.  Widsith 09:33, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

AEL Jesuses again

 * Keep with full support for each comment of Widsith right above. --Gauss 10:07, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

 * Admirably said Widsith, but the question remains: How do we format it? Do we make  identical to, so that all proper nouns have plurals?  Cuz that seems at least a little silly (but perhaps necessary).  Do proper nouns only get plurals on a case by case basis?  The burden is really on those in support to figure out how this will work, because hasn't anyone thought that it might be just a bit misleading to our readers if our proper nouns have plurals?  Cuz proper nouns don't have plurals......largely.  -Atelaes λάλει ἐμοί 14:28, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

 * Seems clear that these should not be linked from the PN inflection line (though I expect that at some point we will need to hash out more thoroughly whether names are always PNs or not) . If they exist, they should either be one-way links (Jesuses -> Jesus but not vice versa), or linked only from a usage note in the lemma entry. -- Visviva 14:45, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

 * I disagree with Visviva on this. There are cases where knowing how to form the plural of an item we present as a proper noun is useful. The cases include all of those that form the plural other than by adding "-s" or "-es" or where it is not 100% obvious whether -s or -es is correct and taxons and other words (where Latin or non-English rules apply). It might also be useful to indicate whether (or when) a proper noun takes a plural verb (eg, mountain ranges). To me it seems that how to form a plural is a dictionary question and whether one should use a plural is a question of grammar. Grammar has not been our strong suit and, evidently, does not fit very well into our entry structure. Perhaps we ought to use our entry structure to do well what it can do and not try to make it do what it is not especially well suited to do.
 * As to Atelaes' question, frankly, the print-dictionary approach (inserting a "-s" or "-es" after nouns that form plurals simply and only spelling out plurals that are "irregular" or where there are alternative forms) devotes about the right amount of space to the task. I also see no reason to show red-links for missing plurals, though blue links for plurals that are entries can show that there might be more to be learned from the plural entry. DCDuring <i >TALK</i > 17:14, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

 * Ugh, this section is getting too long. I have to scroll up for a half hour just to find an edit button.  Anyway, I absolutely agree with Visviva.  While some of these plurals might not be a bad idea to have, if we have them, they should be linked to from the lemma in a usage note, or not at all.  Anything else would be, in my opinion, misleading to our readers.  As to the regularity of pluralization......I don't know if that is really relevant.  We certainly don't make a distinction between regular and irregular plurals in our common nouns.  -Atelaes λάλει ἐμοί 17:27, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

 * I guess if our users don't know how to form a plural of a proper noun, we shouldn't tell them because they might use plurals more often than we think they should.
 * We certainly waste our users' attention with red-linked, spelled-out regular plurals for our ordinary nouns. DCDuring <i >TALK</i > 17:35, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

 * I'm going to assume from the apparent tone of the above response that it was intended to be facetious. So, the reason we're saying that the "plural" of the Proper noun should not be linked from the Proper noun inflection line, is that it's not actually a plural of the Proper noun.  Rather, Jesuses is a plural of a common noun definition of Jesus.  If we link the "plural" from the inflection line, it will positively mislead our readers.  Think of it this way: we don't list adverb "forms" of verbs on the Verb inflection line; we don't like hyphenated adjective forms of compound nouns on the Noun inflection line; and so on.  When the part of speech is different, because of different grammar, we create a new section or even a new entry (in cases where the spelling is different).  Logically then, we shouldn't like to a plural common noun from a proper noun section's inflection line. --EncycloPetey 17:46, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

 * The first comment was facetious, but it reflected my reading of the direction of the discussion. The second comment on redlinked plurals was not facetious at all.
 * I had not appreciated until this extended discussion why it is that most dictionaries don't have proper nouns as entries (excepting taxonomic names and abbreviations of proper nouns). Their presentation is almost inconsistent with the manner of presentation of other kinds of words. Part of the problem I have been having is with denigrating the common-noun use of the entries we label as proper nouns. Then, by assumption, we don't need to bother with plurals. I think even the most obtuse of our users would not mistakenly pluralize a word we present as a proper noun, used as such. But a user might want to know how to refer to the Joneses (or is that Jones or Jones's) in writing or whether (or when) it should be "the Andes is" or "the Andes are". If calling something a proper noun leads to us being unable to present useful information, then we should not call it a proper noun. Perhaps it would be better to call them nouns and limit the label proper noun to the senses that are the true proper noun senses (or, less plausibly, show the plural only at the common-noun senses). If I thought that users would find such information in usage notes when our entry layout has trained them to look a the inflection line for a plural, then I could simply have accepted that suggestion without further discussion. I would be disappointed if we could not address this kind of usage question consistent with our overall manner of presentation. DCDuring <i >TALK</i > 18:47, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

As I read this discussion, there seems to be - at least partly - an issue on how to format the Proper Nouns such that the reader gets the information that *plural can exist, but *only exist in very few cases. The template has already been mentioned: thus I wonder why it doesn't include a "plural" point with the explicit remark "for use as common noun only" (or better formulated)? The plural entries could have a "Noun" header, and the inflection template explains to the user why the PoS's (PoS'es?) seem to differ. I have, however, no comment on whether they *should* be given or not... Just that the issue IMHO *could* be solved. \Mike 18:50, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

 * That seems reasonable enough. Perhaps we could work a link in there to an explanation of what's happening, when and why proper nouns have plurals, etc.  I could live with that, as long as there's a note of caution screaming at the user, I have no qualms about putting it into the inflection line.  -Atelaes λάλει ἐμοί 18:58, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

 * Pending the arrival of the Perfect Solution, that seems like a good approach. Something brief like (rarely plural), with "rarely" a bluelink to a appropriate section in the Proper Nouns appendix, one of the much-anticipated magnum opi from EP. If that is too terse, the (plural for common noun only), with "common noun" bluelinked to the same (not to common noun) would be OK. Perhaps a "plc=" parameter to optionally generate the text on provision of the plural form. DCDuring <i >TALK</i > 19:31, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Something like this sounds great imo.—msh210 ℠ 17:33, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

 * Delete. --Connel MacKenzie 10:12, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Keep Obviously, this is a no-brainer. It's the plural of a non-proper noun word "Jesus" which can be seen for example in the lyrics of Depeche Mode's "Personal Jesus", or in numerous examples listed above. I've gone ahead and added this to the Jesus entry. I got too restless to cite the artistic representation sense, someone else cite that. Language Lover 21:47, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - at least two pertinent senses. People named "Jesus" (of which there are many) and competing conceptions of the Biblical "Jesus" (of which there are also many, as cited). <i style="background:lightgreen">bd2412</i> T 13:49, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Consider, in fact:
 * Multiple conceptions of the Biblical figure: 2005, Richard A. Burridge, Four Gospels, One Jesus?: A Symbolic Reading, p. 165:
 * Four portraits or four Jesuses? The first question concerns whether there are four gospels and one Jesus, or four Jesuses.
 * Multiple figurines or other physical objects constituting depictions of the Biblical figure: 1996, Rick Reilly, Missing Links, p. 59:
 * One Christmas, he talked me into going around town stealing all the baby Jesuses out of creche scenes.
 * Multiple people who happen to share the name, "Jesus": 2003, J. P. Mendum, D. M. Bennett, Revelations of Antichrist Concerning Christ and Christianity, p. 42:
 * We may perhaps accept the Talmud as authority for the existence of a distinguished Professor Jesus and his pupil James ; but what feature has either of them in common with the Jesus or the Jameses of the Gospels, that would not apply as well to almost any other of the numerous Jesuses or Jameses of the first century ?
 * <i style="background:lightgreen">bd2412</i> T 14:07, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

 * Ruakh again has wheel-warred this entry, removing all meaningful warnings. Nothing I said in my edit was incorrect, nor did I remove any of the citations provided.  However, this entry, as it exists now, is purposefully misleading.  It promotes a particular point of view with the explicit intent of offending more than a billion people, by its misrepresentation.  IF the entry is to be kept, it needs to say why and how the term is offensive.  It is not neutral to promote this term as a ordinary correct English term - it simply is not.  Since the entry can't seem to exist without meaningful warnings, it should instead be deleted again.  --Connel MacKenzie 19:36, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

 * Once again, you find yourself lying transparently on a widely-read page. Doesn't bother you that most editors realize within a few days here that they can't trust anything you write? —Ruakh <i >TALK</i > 00:58, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

 * Raukh, what lies? You made this edit to the entry, so you cannot claim that it was not edited by you as you stated . Connel is correct that many Christians are offended by the mere concept of more than one Jesus, just as many Moslems are offended by images of Mohammed, and it is an official and historic heresy. You are splitting hairs in saying that this does not apply to the word that is used to communicate that concept, and are being rude in your response to Connel. --EncycloPetey 01:48, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

 * EP, thanks for your comment. :-)  Connel says "Ruakh again has wheel-warred this entry". Seeing as I've edited that entry exactly once, he can't even claim that I've wheel-warred (except by a very loose definition that construes a single revert as "wheel-warring"), much less that I've "again wheel-warred". I understand that many (even most) Christians would be offended by the concept of more than one Jesus; but most Christians have enough brain cells to rub together and figure out that the word Jesuses: does not, in and of itself, imply such a thing. Connel's edit described the word itself as "intentionally incorrect" and a "violent misconstruction", and said that its use must "purposefully offend[]" Christians. Nonsense; none of that is true, and he knows it, and that makes him a liar; and everyone else here knows it, too, which makes his lies very transparent. As I said on his talk page, he can help craft a useful context tag and/or usage note; but lying his ass off and POV-pushing won't get him anywhere, especially since I suspect (but admittedly cannot prove) that he's trying to abuse religious sensitivity to push his usual prescriptivist this-sounds-wrong-to-me-so-Wiktionary-must-lambaste-it-in-the-harshest-terms POV. (BTW, this isn't a big deal, but I didn't "claim that it was not edited by" me; I stated — correctly — that I hadn't edited it, meaning that I hadn't edited it by the time Connel made his over-the-top edits to it.) Thanks again for your comment; it's good for me to be aware that not everyone sees through Connel's shit. :-/   —Ruakh <i >TALK</i > 12:31, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

 * Ruakh, our definition of wheel war says nothing about multiple edits. Granted, Connel made a mistake in saying that you had "again wheel-warred this entry" as you had not edited that particular entry before.  However, your choice of words ascribes malicious motive to Connel's statement, and your latest response broadens the insult to other users here.  Using profanity repeatedly in an attempt to vent frustration will not endear you to anyone. --EncycloPetey 05:52, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

 * EP, our definition of wheel war says nothing about anything like my edit. However, I'm sorry that I insulted you; you didn't deserve the insult, and certainly I was wrong to characterize your bold assumption of good faith as failure to see through an editor's lies. (I can't share your bold assumption in this case — I did my best and failed — but that doesn't give me the right to criticize you for your success.) You're also right about the use of profanity, and thanks for that important reminder. —Ruakh <i >TALK</i > 17:58, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree with the usage notes of Connel and I was incensed when a reversion befell my essay to restore them in a mitigated version, implying the grammatical ineptitude which this entry præsents with regard to the rules for forming adjectives with Latin origin. (see Talk:Jesuses). I would rather not see the entry deleted but instead provided with the due admonition, since there are some arguably literary citations (arguably - because using this form shews disrespect for Latin and English grammar). But having been impeded by Widsith's revert of the addition of the usage notes and surmising the impossibility to restore the notes I feel obliged to indorse the deletion. Bogorm 21:49, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. For arguments vide supra. Bogorm 21:49, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

AEL Jesuses 2009-02-20
Look. Not all editors here gave explicit !votes, but I've read all the comments thoroughly, and it is my belief that !votes should be !counted as follows: If you disagree with any of my interpretations, or if this !tally omits anyone who commented here (or elsewhere) on this topic, please let me know. Absent an explicit and polite objection within the next week, I plan to resolve this discussion as kept. —Ruakh <i >TALK</i > 02:40, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: 5 !votes: ; ; ; ;
 * Keep: 9 !votes: ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
 * No !vote: ∞·0 !votes: !; !; !; !everyone who didn't participate in the !vote

 * Looks like a good summary. I indeed didn't !vote, but would lean towards !delete (by which I mean keep) at this point.  I haven't seen any plausible arguments raised against having the entry; the real question seems to be how/whether we should address the plural in the lemma entry. -- Visviva 05:41, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Summary good. Perhaps we should limit showing plurals in Proper noun inflection lines to those that are somewhat irregular (ie, not ending in -s). The alternative of non-display for plurals ending in either -s or -es wouldn't be terrible. I still don't understand how the metaphysics of what something "is" determines how we choose to present it. DCDuring TALK 12:27, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

 * The entry as it exists now is flatly wrong and misleading. The "plural" form is only incorrect, used to offend.  Even in the citations given to show incorrect innocent uses, the context of them is absent, not conveying how intentionally offensive the writing they are in, actually are.  Since this community can't create an accurate entry for it with a NPOV while still warning against the inherent offense of the misuse, it is better off being entirely removed.  --Connel MacKenzie 02:12, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

 * Kept, with another quote from Martin Luther to back it up. There's no reason whatsoever to delete this page. Clearly attestable, for all forms of the noun and proper noun Jesus. --Jackofclubs 18:10, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

 * Unkept. Clearly, several editors disagree with you. —Ruakh <i >TALK</i > 18:29, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

 * Fair enough for unkeeping. Can we have some sources supporting that this claim that Jesuses can be offensive? It may seem obvious to some people, but to get a fairer view of the description of the word, it can only help IMHO - in the "usage notes" section. And, of course, Wiktionary does not remove words because they are offensive. Searching for Allahs, as a side note, doesn't give as many hits, but it is attestable, especially in the negative form akin to "there are not two Allahs". The Martin Luther quote I added is analagous to this. --Jackofclubs 18:39, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * What are you trying to achieve by involving Martin Luther? Every one knows that Luther did not write in English and that in Latin the plural form of this particular nound would coincide with the singular one. In German too, since German always accepts the Latin declension of words whih it borrows with the Latin endings. You are not going to convince me until the sentence is found in the original language. It may simply by translator's ruse. The uſer highteth Bogorm converſation 18:44, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

 * Kept. The original debate was whether to include the plural of the proper noun "Jesus". This is still contentious, however, "Jesus" is defined as a Noun too. Therefore it should have a plural, like most other English Nouns. We even went through the bother of explicitly allowing the plurals of common nouns derived from proper nouns, which would give yet another reason to keep this entry. The debate later got sidetracked by a possible "offensiveness" of many "Jesuses", however Wiktionary cannot exclude offensive words - doing so would make it notably less useful. In short there are no relevant reasons to delete this. Further, the community !vote is in support of keeping this. Yes, it will always be contentious, but please take any further discussion to Talk:Jesuses and Talk:Jesus - it might be worth combining the two. Conrad.Irwin 19:24, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

 * I don't see why y'all are so unwilling to wait the full week I offered potential objectors — this sat here untouched for months, it's not like it's a burning issue for anyone — but whatever, striking. —Ruakh <i >TALK</i > 00:28, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

 * For me the iſſue is burning - it encroaches on the innermoſt of my ſpiritual believes. And I ſtill bide the reſponse on my quæſtion about the appropriateneſs to quote M. Luther in tranſlation. The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 11:01, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

 * Re: "And I ſtill bide the reſponse on my quæſtion about the appropriateneſs to quote M. Luther in tranſlation.": Your "question" needs no response, since the quotation was removed. (See .) But if you want to wait anyway, be my guest. —Ruakh <i >TALK</i > 13:29, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Jesuses
Beating a dead horse here, the comments in the previous discussion indicated the offensiveness of this form is obvious (all but one contributor.) The one contributor that removed all indication of the offensiveness of this form marked the previous discussion as closed, which I believe is very bad form.

Again, since this form cannot survive on Wiktionary with any indication of being offensive, the entry itself should not remain.

--Connel MacKenzie 19:44, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

 * Delete - all arguments have been enumerated in the archived discussion on Talk:Jesuses, no reason for this entry to remain. The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 19:51, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

 * Keep. I'm not particularly convinced that the noun Jesus: really meets CFI, but: (1) we just had an RFD discussion; (2) it was open for more than nine months; (3) you participated in that discussion, including in the week after I said "I'm closing this after a week"; and (4) you don't seem to be giving any new reasons, but rather, simply repeating your previous points. In other words, I'm not voting "we should have this entry", but rather "we should accept the results of community discussion for a reasonable amount of time, unless new issues arise". —Ruakh <i >TALK</i > 19:56, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

 * The comments I see in that discussion, (except yours) agree it is obvious it is offensive. But your edit to it removed any trace of accurately describing this word form, as such.  If someone in this community agreed with your removal, they didn't speak up.  Doesn't sounds like "accepting the results of community discussion" to me.  --Connel MacKenzie 20:00, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

 * First of all, Connel, a number of people have agreed that the term is not, in and of itself, offensive. For example, BD2412 added one of the quotations, using the edit summary "add wholly non-offensive plural use". And I was not the first one to remove your bogus additions; Widsith was.
 * Second of all, your analogy is specious. There was an RFD discussion, that clearly reached the conclusion that the entry should be kept. You are refusing to accept that conclusion. By contrast, there has not been a discussion on whether the context labels you added (“”) and usage note you added (“This mis-construction cannot be used without purposefully offending Christians; the mere suggestion of more than one is heresy.”) should be included. If you would like to start such a discussion, you are more than welcome to. But I can't imagine you really believe that the community would support the note.
 * Third of all, when I removed the usage note (because it was blatantly wrong), I left you a comment on your talk-page that read in part, "perhaps you can help craft an accurate context tag and/or usage note". You ignored that, and instead began to push for the entry's deletion. So, as far as I can tell, you would only be willing to keep the entry if it had exactly the usage note that you put there. Is that indeed the case?
 * —Ruakh <i >TALK</i > 20:34, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

 * No, I am not concerned with the wording, only that a usage warning appear. --Connel MacKenzie 02:57, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

 * The apt usage notes can be called blatantly wrong only from a non-Christian point of view. They are true for every Christian (at least for every Catholic and Orthodox) and since they concern exclusively Christianity and the blasphemy which this plural form presents, non-Christian views are to be considered irrelevant. The quæstion is: does the Christian part of the community agree that the plural form is purposefully offending them (I certainly do) and that the usage notes are sound rather than: does everyone agree... Exactly if there were the usage notes: Lotus Sutra is considered apocryphal for Theravada Buddhists it would not be up to Christians to decide whether to remove or add such a usage note on Lotus Sutra, but to Theravada Buddhists. The situation is the same here. The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 21:19, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, I'm a Christian, and (as I said below) I don't consider a single one of the examples currently on the page to be offensive. None of them suggests that there was more than one Jesus of Nazareth, and none of them is either heretical or blasphemous. That's not to say the word couldn't be used in an offensive/heretical/blasphemous way, but it is clear that the word "Jesuses" is not in and of itself offensive, heretical, or blasphemous. Angr 21:27, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I think the most convincing solution would be to write a letter to Congregatio pro Doctrina Fidei and if they express the same concern as in the usage notes we are discussing here, to keep them. Probably not everyone would agree, but for me that would be an incontrovertible criterium. The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 21:41, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

 * I don't think that's either a viable or a desirable solution. CDF is responsible for Roman Catholic doctrine, but (1) this issue is not restricted to Catholics, and (2) this isn't a matter of doctrine anyway. Angr 21:50, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

 * Do they speak English? And anyway, the context labels claimed that it was " intentionally incorrect", and the usage note claimed that it couldn't "be used without purposefully offending Christians" (emphases mine). Those are claims about the person using the word, not about the person hearing it; so unless you're saying that the CDF uses the word Jesuses:, and that you want to ask them if they do it to be incorrect and offensive, their opinion isn't quite relevant to these claims. —Ruakh <i >TALK</i > 22:52, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

 * Keep, and none of the examples provided in the article at least is offensive, so it while it can be used offensively (like virtually every word), it isn't necessarily offensive. Angr 20:36, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. I have a box of Jesuses in my desk drawer right now, and I know of no one who is the least bit offended when I bring them out. <i style="background:lightgreen">bd2412</i> T 23:27, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

 * Keep, the idea that we would remove an entry because someone finds it offensive is absurd. While the entry may well benefit from some contags and usage notes, the ones inserted by Connel were rather over the top.  -Atelaes λάλει ἐμοί 23:55, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

 * Keep. I have added a usage note, the wording of which should be discussed on Talk:Jesuses not here. Conrad.Irwin 13:17, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Recent RFD showed keep, and I agree with the reasons anyway.—msh210 ℠  16:16, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, passed RFD, if offensive to some then that is not a reason to remove. I doubt it needs ANY usage notes to this effect at all.--Dmol 10:52, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

 * IMVHO, the real "blasphemy" is the production of "plastic Jesuses on a cross" and displaying images of how our saviour died as if it were something to boast about! But the word itself is OK. Without it, how else could I denounce that aforementioned real blasphemy? It is a word in current use. It should be in the dictionary. Keep. -- <i>A LGRIF </i ><font color="#FFD700"> talk  10:20, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * For the record, the box of Jesuses in my desk are not crucifixes, they are just serenely standing there (and their feet light up when you press a button). <i style="background:lightgreen">bd2412</i> T 20:16, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. I was astounded when, while in the military, I learned that some people in the northern U.S. consider the word Jesus offensive, and that if you say it in their presence, you could have your face slapped. In the South, Midwest, and West, there is nothing offensive about it. More recently, I’ve heard of Hispanic men being savagely beaten because their name was Jesús. It’s all very odd to me. It reminds me of the Bizarro world in Superman comics, where everything is backwards. I suppose that if somebody finds it offensive, they probably won’t be looking it up here. If they are offended by it, they already know they are offended and don’t need to be reminded. —Stephen 19:48, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Satanism is heretical and offensive to many Christians, that does not make it an offensive word.  Ƿidsiþ 20:24, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Kept still/again. —Ruakh <i >TALK</i > 20:12, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:Jesuses


text: H-hours

title: H-hours


text: HTTP cookies

title: HTTP cookies


text: Haast's eagles

title: Haast's eagles


text: Hall effects

title: Hall effects


text: Hammond organs

title: Hammond organs


text:
sluk

Noun

 * 1) A fishing lure

Noun

 * 1) A drain

title: sluk


text: Harlem sunsets

title: Harlem sunsets


text:
slukker

Etymology 1
From.

Noun

 * 1) an extinguisher, in particular a fire extinguisher

title: slukker


text: Harvard commas

title: Harvard commas


text: slukkede

title: slukkede


text: slukket

title: slukket


text: Helmholtz coils

title: Helmholtz coils


text: Hercules beetles

title: Hercules beetles


text: semiperimeters

title: semiperimeters


text: Himalayan field rats

title: Himalayan field rats


text: Himalayan griffon vultures

title: Himalayan griffon vultures


text: Himalayan marmots

title: Himalayan marmots


text: Himalayan shrews

title: Himalayan shrews


text: Himalayan striped squirrels

title: Himalayan striped squirrels


text: Hippocratic oaths

title: Hippocratic oaths


text: Hobson's choices

title: Hobson's choices


text: Homburg hats

title: Homburg hats


text: Home Information Packs

title: Home Information Packs


text: cabinet ministers

title: cabinet ministers


text: belly laughs

title: belly laughs


text: hydrochloric acids

title: hydrochloric acids


text:
bør

Etymology 1
From. It is derived from the verb, from.

Noun

 * 1) wheelbarrow
 * 2) battered old hat

Etymology 2
From,.

Noun

 * 1) wind, fair wind

Etymology 3
From, , from , cognate with 🇨🇬, , 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬. .

Noun

 * 1)  womb, uterus

Etymology 1
From, from. Akin to 🇨🇬. , with which it was considered an alternative form until 2012.

Noun

 * 1) burden

Etymology 2
From, from.

Noun

 * 1) sailing wind

Noun

 * 1)  hail

title: bør


text: quantum Hall effects

title: quantum Hall effects


text: serial commas

title: serial commas


text:
idylický

Etymology
As if

Adjective

 * 1) idyllic extremely happy, peaceful, or picturesque

title: idylický


text: dependent variables

title: dependent variables


text:
burdet

Noun

 * 1) A cotton fabric.

title: burdet


text: Oxford commas

title: Oxford commas


text: house styles

title: house styles


text: Huayco tinamous

title: Huayco tinamous


text:
idylka

Noun

 * 1) idyllic idyllic state or situation

title: idylka


text: Humboldt penguins

title: Humboldt penguins


text: blue moons

title: blue moons


text: ID cards

title: ID cards


text: ID holograms

title: ID holograms


text: Iberian lynxes

title: Iberian lynxes


text:
Muddy York

Etymology
muddy + York

Proper noun

 * 1)  Toronto, Canada

title: Muddy York


text: Ichang lemons

title: Ichang lemons


text: Immelmann maneuvers

title: Immelmann maneuvers


text: Immelmann turns

title: Immelmann turns


text: India pale ales

title: India pale ales


text: Indian burns

title: Indian burns


text: Indian elephants

title: Indian elephants


text: Indian givers

title: Indian givers


text: Indian pangolins

title: Indian pangolins


text: Plimsoll marks

title: Plimsoll marks


text:
Tver

Etymology
Borrowed from.

Proper noun

 * , northwest of Moscow.
 * , northwest of Moscow.

Synonyms

 * (from 1931 to 1990)

Translations

 * Arabic: تْفِير, تْفِير
 * Armenian: Տվեր
 * Belarusian: Цвер
 * Bulgarian: Твер
 * Chinese:
 * Mandarin:
 * Chuvash: Тӗвер
 * Danish: Tver
 * Finnish:
 * Georgian: ტვერი
 * German:
 * Hebrew: טבר
 * Hindi: त्वेर
 * Japanese: トヴェリ, トベリ
 * Korean: 트베리
 * Latin: Tueria
 * Latvian: Tvera
 * Lithuanian: Tverė
 * Macedonian: Твер
 * Mongolian: Тверь
 * Polish:
 * Portuguese: Tver
 * Russian:
 * Serbo-Croatian:
 * Cyrillic: Твер
 * Roman: Tver
 * Swedish: Tver
 * Thai: ตเวียร์
 * Ukrainian: Твер

Etymology
From.

title: Tver


text: fantasztikusabb

title: fantasztikusabb


text: Iriomote cats

title: Iriomote cats


text: legfantasztikusabb

title: legfantasztikusabb


text: Irish coffees

title: Irish coffees


text: legeslegfantasztikusabb

title: legeslegfantasztikusabb


text: torsdagen

title: torsdagen


text: Irish hobbies

title: Irish hobbies


text: Irish flutes

title: Irish flutes


text: torsdage

title: torsdage


text: Irish jokes

title: Irish jokes


text: torsdagene

title: torsdagene


text: Irish pennants

title: Irish pennants


text: political systems

title: political systems


text: Italian sonnets

title: Italian sonnets


text: merchant ships

title: merchant ships


text: lash lines

title: lash lines


text: identity cards

title: identity cards


text: prickly pears

title: prickly pears


text: albinoen

title: albinoen


text: cargo vessels

title: cargo vessels


text: albinoer

title: albinoer


text: bulk carriers

title: bulk carriers


text: container ships

title: container ships


text: albinoerne

title: albinoerne


text: bulk cargos

title: bulk cargos


text: J strokes

title: J strokes


text:
stemte

Pronunciation

 * , (in the participle)

title: stemte


text:
stemt

Etymology 1
A past participle of.

Adjective

 * 1)  voiced
 * 2)  in tune

title: stemt


text: coozes

title: coozes


text:
Тверь

Synonyms

 * (from 1931 to 1990)

title: Тверь


text: strengen

title: strengen


text: strenge

title: strenge


text: strengene

title: strengene


text:
Smolensk

Etymology
Borrowed from.

Translations

 * Arabic: سْمُولِينْسْك
 * Armenian: Սմոլենսկ
 * Belarusian: Смале́нск
 * Bulgarian: Смоле́нск
 * Chinese:
 * Mandarin: 斯摩棱斯克
 * Czech: Smolensk
 * Danish: Smolensk
 * Finnish:
 * French:
 * Georgian: სმოლენსკი
 * Hebrew: סמולנסק
 * Hindi: स्मोलेन्स्क
 * Hungarian:
 * Italian: Smolensk
 * Japanese: スモレンスク
 * Kalmyk: Смоленск
 * Khakas: Смоленск
 * Korean:
 * Latvian: Smoļenska
 * Lithuanian: Smolenskas
 * Macedonian: Смоле́нск
 * Marathi: स्मोलेन्स्क
 * Mongolian: Смоленск
 * Persian: اسمالنسک
 * Polish:
 * Portuguese: Smolensk, Esmolensco
 * Russian:
 * Serbo-Croatian: Смоленск, Smolensk
 * Slovak: Smolensk
 * Slovene: Smolensk
 * Spanish: Smolensk
 * Tuvan: Смоленск
 * Ukrainian: Смоле́нськ
 * Vietnamese: Smolensk
 * Yakut: Смоленскай

title: Smolensk


text:
SIG

Proper noun

 * 1)  (Collection of Greek Inscriptions)

title: SIG


text: SIGs

title: SIGs


text: nevøen

title: nevøen


text: nevøer

title: nevøer


text: nevøerne

title: nevøerne


text:
Եփեսոս

Etymology
From.

Etymology
From.

title: Եփեսոս


text: barberingen

title: barberingen


text: barberinger

title: barberinger


text: barberingerne

title: barberingerne


text:
Napóleon

Proper noun

 * 1) Napoleon (Bonaparte)

title: Napóleon


text: radzimire

title: radzimire


text: overrask

title: overrask


text: overrasker

title: overrasker


text: overraskede

title: overraskede


text: overrasket

title: overrasket


text:
bottarga

Etymology
Borrowed from. .

Noun

 * 1) A Mediterranean dish of cured fish roe

Translations

 * Greek:

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) a Mediterranean dish of cured fish roe
 * 2) botargo
 * 3) salted mullet roe

title: bottarga


text: gnosticismen

title: gnosticismen


text:
lymphodema

Noun

 * 1)  A condition of fluid retention caused by a compromised lymphatic system.

title: lymphodema


text:
szamizdat

Noun

 * 1) samizdat underground, often illegal, literature

title: szamizdat


text: szamizdatok

title: szamizdatok


text: abusos

title: abusos


text: åbn

title: åbn


text: åbner

title: åbner


text: åbnede

title: åbnede


text: åbnet

title: åbnet


text:
նման

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) similar, like, resembling

Postposition

 * 1) like, as, such as

Etymology
From, composed of the prefix  and the root. For the constituents compare Sanskrit and, Persian , Kurdish ,.

Adjective

 * 1) like, similar, resembling
 * 2) equal, conformable, analogous
 * 1) equal, conformable, analogous
 * 1) equal, conformable, analogous

Adverb

 * 1) similarly, in the same manner, alike, such

Preposition

 * 1) like, as, such as

title: նման


text: ligationem

title: ligationem


text: mandagen

title: mandagen


text: mandage

title: mandage


text: mandagene

title: mandagene


text:
sandet

Etymology
From.

title: sandet


text: palaeogeneticist

title: palaeogeneticist


text:
palaeogenetics

Etymology
From.

title: palaeogenetics


text: paleogeneticists

title: paleogeneticists


text:
laparoszkóp

Noun

 * 1) laparoscope

title: laparoszkóp


text: laparoszkópok

title: laparoszkópok


text: paleogenomics

title: paleogenomics


text:
supranuclear palsy

Noun

 * 1)  A rare degenerative disease involving the gradual deterioration and death of selected areas of the brain.

title: supranuclear palsy


text:
palaeogenomics

Noun

 * 1) The study of ancient genomes, especially those of extinct organisms

title: palaeogenomics


text:
supranuclear

Adjective

 * 1)  Above the level of the motor neurons

Translations

 * Spanish: supranuclear

Etymology
From.

title: supranuclear


text:
zsinat

Etymology
. Borrowed from, from , from +.

Noun

 * 1)  synod an ecclesiastic council or meeting to consult on church matters
 * 2)  clatter, noise, clamor noisy talk or chatter
 * 1)  clatter, noise, clamor noisy talk or chatter

title: zsinat


text: zsinatok

title: zsinatok


text: paleogeochemical

title: paleogeochemical


text:
szinódus

Noun

 * 1) synod

title: szinódus


text: szinódusok

title: szinódusok


text:
palaeogeochemical

Adjective

 * 1) Of or pertaining to palaeogeochemistry

title: palaeogeochemical


text: forradalmak

title: forradalmak


text:
palaeogeochemistry

Noun

 * 1) The study of the changes in the geochemistry of the Earth over geologic time

title: palaeogeochemistry


text:
odds on

Adjective

 * 1) Likely:

title: odds on


text: kunnet

title: kunnet


text:
paleognath

Noun

 * 1)  Any bird of the superorder.

title: paleognath


text: reddet

title: reddet


text:
paleolatitudinal

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) Relating to paleolatitude.

title: paleolatitudinal


text:
palaeolatitudinal

Etymology
From.

title: palaeolatitudinal


text: paleosalinity

title: paleosalinity


text: paleothermometry

title: paleothermometry


text:
palaeothermometry

Noun

 * 1) the estimation of the temperature in the geologic past

title: palaeothermometry


text: bodybuildingen

title: bodybuildingen


text:
palmitotransferase

Noun

 * 1)  palmitoyltransferase

title: palmitotransferase


text: palindromet

title: palindromet


text: palindromer

title: palindromer


text: palindromerne

title: palindromerne


text: akilleshælen

title: akilleshælen


text:
palmitoyltransferase

Noun

 * 1)  Any transferase involved in palmitoylation

title: palmitoyltransferase


text: akilleshæle

title: akilleshæle


text: akilleshælene

title: akilleshælene


text:
blus

Etymology
From, from.

Noun

 * 1)  a women's.

Noun

 * 1) blouse; an outer garment, today usually about a woman's shirt

title: blus


text:
blusser

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) One who extinguished fires, an.

title: blusser


text: blussede

title: blussede


text: blusset

title: blusset


text: palynofloras

title: palynofloras


text:
palynoflora

Noun

 * 1) The pollen and spores of a region or site, considered as a whole

title: palynoflora


text: lørdagen

title: lørdagen


text: lørdage

title: lørdage


text: lørdagene

title: lørdagene


text:
palynological

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) Of or pertaining to palynology.

Translations

 * French:
 * Italian: palinologico
 * Portuguese: palinológico

title: palynological


text: jackass penguins

title: jackass penguins


text: palmitoyltransferases

title: palmitoyltransferases


text: paleosalinities

title: paleosalinities


text: paleognaths

title: paleognaths


text: ambient pressures

title: ambient pressures


text: counterevidences

title: counterevidences


text: external risks

title: external risks


text: counter-evidences

title: counter-evidences


text: fissen

title: fissen


text: remote sensing scientists

title: remote sensing scientists


text: weight measures

title: weight measures


text: broached spires

title: broached spires


text: brick veneers

title: brick veneers


text: dado rails

title: dado rails


text: garret windows

title: garret windows


text: bow windows

title: bow windows


text: second grades

title: second grades


text: report cards

title: report cards


text: grade schools

title: grade schools


text: grammar schools

title: grammar schools


text: twelfth grades

title: twelfth grades


text: eighth grades

title: eighth grades


text: eleventh grades

title: eleventh grades


text: ninth grades

title: ninth grades


text: middle schools

title: middle schools


text: school counselors

title: school counselors


text: sixth grades

title: sixth grades


text: seventh grades

title: seventh grades


text: tenth grades

title: tenth grades


text: third grades

title: third grades


text: fifth grades

title: fifth grades


text: first grades

title: first grades


text: fourth grades

title: fourth grades


text:
roond

Etymology
From, from.

Adjective

 * 1) round

Preposition

 * 1) around, round

Adverb

 * 1) round

Noun

 * 1) round

Verb

 * 1) to round

title: roond


text: farerne

title: farerne


text:
roon

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) leaf

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) rune

Noun

 * 1) A rim or border.
 * 1) A rim or border.

Adverb

 * 1) there

Usage notes

 * When the preceding word does not end with a vowel, $⟨w⟩$, or $⟨y⟩$, is used instead.

title: roon


text: farede

title: farede


text: faret

title: faret


text:
zahnout

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to turn, round

title: zahnout


text:
c'est en forgeant qu'on devient forgeron

Etymology
lit. 'it's by forging that one becomes a blacksmith'.

Proverb

 * 1) practice makes perfect


text:
zakončit

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to finish, to formally conclude (eg. a speech)

title: zakončit


text:
cruinnich

Verb

 * 1) gather, assemble, collect
 * 2) make round

title: cruinnich


text:
cruinneachadh

Noun

 * 1) gathering, assembly
 * 2) collection
 * 3) anthology
 * 1) anthology

title: cruinneachadh


text:
Rhymes:Icelandic/ɔːrʏːɣʏr

Three syllables

 * forugur
 * horugur
 * hvorugur
 * morugur
 * slorugur

title: Rhymes:Icelandic/ɔːrʏːɣʏr


text:
mun cuairt

Preposition

 * 1) about, around, round
 * 2)  about, concerning

Adverb

 * 1) about, around, round

title: mun cuairt


text: cuairtean

title: cuairtean


text:
brush-turkey

Noun

 * 1) Any of several species of large birds, found in Australia and New Guinea, in the megapode (turkey-like) family.

Synonyms

 * bush turkey, scrub turkey

Translations

 * Chinese:
 * Mandarin: 叢塚雉
 * Esperanto:
 * Finnish: ,
 * French:
 * Vietnamese: gà tây bụi rậm Úc

title: brush-turkey


text: brush-turkeys

title: brush-turkeys


text:
eludible

Adjective

 * 1)  Avoidable; escapable.

Adjective

 * 1) avoidable

title: eludible


text:
timcheall

Etymology
From, verbal noun of.

Preposition

 * 1) round, around, about

Usage notes

 * Followed by the genitive case or the preposition :

Adverb

 * 1) round, around, about

title: timcheall


text:
velló

Etymology
Probably an alteration of, from , from. Cf. also 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1)  fleece; the wool of a woolly animal, such as a sheep
 * 2)  fleece; the skin of a woolly animal with the wool still attached

title: velló


text:
obchůzka

Noun

 * 1) round doctor's, policeman's etc

title: obchůzka


text:
kánon

Noun

 * 1)  round

title: kánon


text:
runda

Noun

 * 1) round of drinks

Related terms

 * See

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1)  round

Verb

 * 1) to pile

Etymology
From or.

Noun

 * 1) round (of drinks, or any other kind of circular and repetitive activity)
 * 2)  round

Noun

 * 1) a round, a tour, a walk
 * jag bjuder på den här rundan
 * this round is on me (I'm paying for the drinks)
 * gå en runda med hunden
 * take the dog for a walk

Verb

 * 1) to round, to make round
 * 2) to round, to pass, to go (or sail) around (something or someone)

authors: Гражданская оборона

title: runda


text:
reklamo

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) complaint

Etymology
From or possibly. Both from (although today, the word publicité is preferred), ultimately from  ("I shout, I ask, I resound").

Noun

 * 1) advertisement
 * 2) publicity

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) advertisement

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) complaint; objection
 * 2) claim; demand
 * 1) claim; demand

title: reklamo


text: vellons

title: vellons


text:
ikaw

Etymology
From.

Pronoun

 * 1) you

Etymology
From.

Pronoun

 * 1) you

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) you

Pronoun

 * 1) you

Etymology
From.

Pronoun

 * 1) you

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) earring

Etymology
From.

Pronoun

 * 1) you singular

Etymology
From (compare 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, and 🇨🇬), from  (compare 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, and 🇨🇬).

Pronoun

 * 1) you

Usage notes
The word ikaw is replaced by in the inverted sentence position when it is the topic of the sentence and immediately followed by a noun, verb, adjective, or adverb in a phrase.

Interjection

 * 1) up to you

Etymology
From.

Pronoun

 * 1) you

title: ikaw


text: dessert grapes

title: dessert grapes


text: hedge trees

title: hedge trees


text: kaffir limes

title: kaffir limes


text: jostaberries

title: jostaberries


text: strawberry pears

title: strawberry pears


text: dragon fruits

title: dragon fruits


text: monkey breads

title: monkey breads


text: cashew apples

title: cashew apples


text: sweet oranges

title: sweet oranges


text: stone fruits

title: stone fruits


text: star fruits

title: star fruits


text: highbush blueberries

title: highbush blueberries


text: lowbush blueberries

title: lowbush blueberries


text: Murrumbidgee jams

title: Murrumbidgee jams


text: Karelian pasties

title: Karelian pasties


text: Scotch eggs

title: Scotch eggs


text: bear claws

title: bear claws


text: Welsh rarebits

title: Welsh rarebits


text: Welsh rabbits

title: Welsh rabbits


text: black chanterelles

title: black chanterelles


text: blanched almonds

title: blanched almonds


text: eating establishments

title: eating establishments


text: crab burgers

title: crab burgers


text: crack seeds

title: crack seeds


text: tallarines

title: tallarines


text: fideos

title: fideos


text:
's e do bheatha

Etymology
From or  (with ’s e ‘(it is) he’ substituted for dia reanalyzed as ‘god’), from  or. Compare 🇨🇬 and.

Phrase
Literally: "it's your life"

 * 1) don't mention it, you're welcome (in response to tapadh leat)
 * 2) no problem
 * 3) do as you please

title: 's e do bheatha


text: Jaffa cakes

title: Jaffa cakes


text: Jacobi symbols

title: Jacobi symbols


text:
's e ur beatha

Phrase

 * 1) you're welcome
 * 2) don't mention it
 * 3) no problem
 * 4) do as you please
 * 5) it's your life

title: 's e ur beatha


text: cabellos

title: cabellos


text: rondeaux

title: rondeaux


text: rondoj

title: rondoj


text: maleos

title: maleos


text: age standardized rates

title: age standardized rates


text:
őssejt

Noun

 * 1)  stem cell

title: őssejt


text: őssejtek

title: őssejtek


text: antipathogens

title: antipathogens


text: adherens junctions

title: adherens junctions


text: alternate generations

title: alternate generations


text: ascoviruses

title: ascoviruses


text:
sejt

Noun

 * 1) cell

Etymology 2
Cognate of.

Verb

 * 1)   to suspect, presume, guess (have a hunch)

title: sejt


text:
sejtek

Etymology 1
From the noun.

Etymology 2
From the verb.

title: sejtek


text: RNA worlds

title: RNA worlds


text: arundinoids

title: arundinoids


text: Category:hu:Cytology

title: Category:hu:Cytology


text: hard palates

title: hard palates


text: alveolar bones

title: alveolar bones


text: bizygomatic breadths

title: bizygomatic breadths


text: anterior cingulate cortexes

title: anterior cingulate cortexes


text: bulbourethral glands

title: bulbourethral glands


text: cingulate cortexes

title: cingulate cortexes


text:
őssejtkutatás

Noun

 * 1) stem cell research

title: őssejtkutatás


text: corpora callosa

title: corpora callosa


text: kutatások

title: kutatások


text: basicrania

title: basicrania


text: articular cartilages

title: articular cartilages


text: autopalatines

title: autopalatines


text: caudal peduncles

title: caudal peduncles


text: cardiac muscles

title: cardiac muscles


text: carpal bones

title: carpal bones


text: acrocoracohumeral ligaments

title: acrocoracohumeral ligaments


text: acrocoracoid processes

title: acrocoracoid processes


text: coracoid processes

title: coracoid processes


text: caudal fins

title: caudal fins


text: adrenal cortexes

title: adrenal cortexes


text: capituli

title: capituli


text: calvariums

title: calvariums


text: axial lobes

title: axial lobes


text: Rhymes:Icelandic/eiːtɪtl

title: Rhymes:Icelandic/eiːtɪtl


text: cheek pouches

title: cheek pouches


text:
egoless

Adjective

 * 1) Lacking ego: not egotistical

title: egoless


text: endplaying

title: endplaying


text: connective tissues

title: connective tissues


text: luteal phases

title: luteal phases


text:
dráb

Etymology
, from,.

Noun

 * 1) warrant officer, catchpole

title: dráb


text: menstrual cycles

title: menstrual cycles


text:
biřic

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) warrant officer, catchpole

title: biřic


text: double chins

title: double chins


text: dorsal fins

title: dorsal fins


text: ductless glands

title: ductless glands


text: endocrine glands

title: endocrine glands


text: gastrointestinal tracts

title: gastrointestinal tracts


text: dermomyotomes

title: dermomyotomes


text: ethmoid bones

title: ethmoid bones


text: sphenoid bones

title: sphenoid bones


text: zygomatic bones

title: zygomatic bones


text:
efavirenz

Etymology
Probably from.

Noun

 * 1)  A nonnucleoside  C14H9ClF3NO2 that is administered orally with other antiretroviral agents in the treatment of type-1 HIV infection.

title: efavirenz


text: exocrine glands

title: exocrine glands


text: salivary glands

title: salivary glands


text: parathyroid glands

title: parathyroid glands


text: pineoblastomas

title: pineoblastomas


text: pineoblastomata

title: pineoblastomata


text: pinealomas

title: pinealomas


text: pinealomata

title: pinealomata


text: pituitary glands

title: pituitary glands


text: thyroidectomies

title: thyroidectomies


text: thyroid glands

title: thyroid glands


text: faucial tonsils

title: faucial tonsils


text: palatine tonsils

title: palatine tonsils


text: lingual tonsils

title: lingual tonsils


text: fifth cranial nerves

title: fifth cranial nerves


text: trigeminal nerves

title: trigeminal nerves


text: cranial nerves

title: cranial nerves


text: vagus nerves

title: vagus nerves


text: eye teeth

title: eye teeth


text: epigastria

title: epigastria


text: entorhinal cortexes

title: entorhinal cortexes


text: entorhinal cortices

title: entorhinal cortices


text:
ecoconscious

Adjective

 * 1) Environmentally aware; sensitive to environmental impact

title: ecoconscious


text: endarteria

title: endarteria


text: endarterectomies

title: endarterectomies


text: cerebral hemispheres

title: cerebral hemispheres


text: greater alar cartilages

title: greater alar cartilages


text: palliums

title: palliums


text:
Talk:aspre

aspres

From project gutenberg, p.2 of The Turkish Jester by Hoca Nasreddin (published 1884)

quote One night the Cogia dreamt that he was given nine aspres, whereupon the Cogia said, 'O now pray make them up ten'; afterwards he said, 'Make them up eleven,' and then presently, a dispute having arisen, he awoke and saw that in his hand he had nothing, thereupon closing his eyes anew and stretching out his hands, he said, 'Well, well, I shall be content with nine aspres.' unquote.

title: Talk:aspre


text: glenohumeral joints

title: glenohumeral joints


text: glial cells

title: glial cells


text: gluteal clefts

title: gluteal clefts


text: kidney corpuscles

title: kidney corpuscles


text: renal corpuscles

title: renal corpuscles


text: Malpighian corpuscles

title: Malpighian corpuscles


text: lower chambers

title: lower chambers


text: lower houses

title: lower houses


text: upper chambers

title: upper chambers


text: upper houses

title: upper houses


text: guans

title: guans


text: intervertebral discs

title: intervertebral discs


text: intervillous spaces

title: intervillous spaces


text: integumentary patterns

title: integumentary patterns


text: innominate bones

title: innominate bones


text: nasal cavities

title: nasal cavities


text: inferior vena cavas

title: inferior vena cavas


text: lesser saphenous veins

title: lesser saphenous veins


text: small saphenous veins

title: small saphenous veins


text: pectoralis majors

title: pectoralis majors


text: serous membranes

title: serous membranes


text: lacrimal sacs

title: lacrimal sacs


text: lacrimal lakes

title: lacrimal lakes


text: inferior colliculi

title: inferior colliculi


text: cerebral aqueducts

title: cerebral aqueducts


text: substantia nigras

title: substantia nigras


text: ventral tegmental areas

title: ventral tegmental areas


text: limbic systems

title: limbic systems


text: primiparas

title: primiparas


text: primiparae

title: primiparae


text:
User talk:Mehdavi

Conrad.Irwin 01:42, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Conrad.Irwin 01:42, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

title: User talk:Mehdavi


text:
sab

Etymology 1
Short for.

Verb

 * 1)  To sabotage, especially fox hunts in opposition to blood sports.

Noun

 * 1)  A saboteur, especially of fox hunts.

Etymology 2
Short for.

Noun

 * 1)  A sabbatical officer.

Noun

 * 1) pines

Etymology
cf. 🇨🇬

Noun

 * 1) net

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) sand

Etymology
From. Compare 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1) to find
 * 2) to find (something or someone) useful
 * 3) to catch
 * 4) to look for
 * 5) to find out, to realise
 * 6) to be known as
 * 1) to be known as

Noun

 * 1) net

Noun

 * 1) sob

Verb

 * 1) sob

title: sab


text:
User talk:Twilightcutie123

Conrad.Irwin 01:49, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Conrad.Irwin 01:49, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

title: User talk:Twilightcutie123


text:
Смоленск

Etymology
From.

title: Смоленск


text:
Ինգա

Proper noun

 * , Inga

title: Ինգա


text: redet

title: redet


text:
Ագապի

Proper noun

 * , Agapi

title: Ագապի


text:
redenen

Etymology 1
From. Equivalent to.

Verb

 * 1)  to speak
 * 2)  to discuss
 * 3)  to reason

title: redenen


text:
Աիդա

Etymology
.

title: Աիդա


text: redentje

title: redentje


text:
Ալինա

Etymology
From.

title: Ալինա


text: immunodeficiencies

title: immunodeficiencies


text: urracas

title: urracas


text:
Ամալյա

Proper noun

 * , Amalya

title: Ամալյա


text:
Ալվարդ

Etymology
From.

title: Ալվարդ


text: rabilarga

title: rabilarga


text: rabilargas

title: rabilargas


text: rabilargos

title: rabilargos


text: spermatocytes

title: spermatocytes


text: sperm cells

title: sperm cells


text:
Murmansk

Etymology
Borrowed from.

Proper noun

 * , on the Arctic Ocean.
 * , on the Arctic Ocean.

Translations

 * Afrikaans: Moermansk
 * Arabic: ميورمانسك
 * Armenian: Մուրմանսկ
 * Belarusian: Му́рманск
 * Bulgarian: Му́рманск
 * Chinese:
 * Mandarin:
 * Danish: Murmansk
 * Dutch: Moermansk
 * Faroese: Murmansk
 * Finnish:
 * French:
 * Georgian: მურმანსკი
 * Greek:
 * Hebrew: מורמנסק
 * Hindi: मुरमंस्क
 * Hungarian:
 * Japanese: ムルマンスク
 * Kildin Sami: Мурман
 * Korean: ^무르만스크
 * Latvian: Murmanska
 * Lithuanian: Murmanskas
 * Macedonian: Мурманск
 * Mongolian: Мурманск
 * Northern Sami: Murmánska
 * Persian: مورمانسک
 * Polish:
 * Portuguese: Murmansk
 * Russian: ,
 * Serbo-Croatian:
 * Cyrillic: Мурманск
 * Roman: Murmansk
 * Skolt Sami: Muurman
 * Slovak: Murmansk
 * Spanish: Múrmansk
 * Swedish: Murmansk
 * Thai: มูร์มันสค์
 * Ukrainian: Му́рманськ
 * Uyghur: مۇرمانسك

Etymology
From.

Proper noun

 * 1) Murmansk city or oblast

title: Murmansk


text: cold abscesses

title: cold abscesses


text: autismen

title: autismen


text: autismetje

title: autismetje


text: autismes

title: autismes


text: autistább

title: autistább


text: legautistább

title: legautistább


text: legeslegautistább

title: legeslegautistább


text: autisták

title: autisták


text: ataxias

title: ataxias


text: common colds

title: common colds


text:
Мурманск

Etymology
From, itself a clipping of , from attested from the 14th century, probably a borrowing from.

Renamed from in 1917.

title: Мурманск


text: amniotic fluid embolisms

title: amniotic fluid embolisms


text: dermoid cysts

title: dermoid cysts


text: cot deaths

title: cot deaths


text: cluster headaches

title: cluster headaches


text: dyslexies

title: dyslexies


text: occlusion bodies

title: occlusion bodies


text: Nukleinsäuren

title: Nukleinsäuren


text:
evidentialist

Adjective

 * 1)  Of or supporting evidentialism, the doctrine that evidence is of primary importance in questions of belief

Noun

 * 1)  One who supports or argues for evidentialism

title: evidentialist


text: papillomaviruses

title: papillomaviruses


text:
dualist

Adjective

 * 1) Of or supporting dualism.

Noun

 * 1) Any person who supports dualism, the belief in absolute good and absolute evil.
 * 2) Any person who believes in or argues for the duality of something.
 * 1) Any person who believes in or argues for the duality of something.

Translations

 * Czech: dualista
 * Greek:

Etymology
.

Adjective

 * 1) dualistic

title: dualist


text:
Talk:Мурманск

Múrmansk and Murmánsk
Normally and offcially it's Múrmansk, Murmánsk is said by sailors and some Murmansk citizens. It gives some special flavour to the sound, which they are proud of. Unable to provide sources for the claim, just my personal observation. --Anatoli 02:12, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:Мурманск


text: colony counters

title: colony counters


text: cypoviruses

title: cypoviruses


text:
droney

Adjective

 * 1) Characterized by droning

title: droney


text: scaffold proteins

title: scaffold proteins


text: proton pumps

title: proton pumps


text: action potentials

title: action potentials


text: sympathischer

title: sympathischer


text: sympathischsten

title: sympathischsten


text: Synapsen

title: Synapsen


text:
driveline

Noun

 * 1)  The drivetrain minus the engine and transmission
 * 2) The powertrain in general

title: driveline


text: Kontraktionen

title: Kontraktionen


text: Stammzellen

title: Stammzellen


text:
dorkiness

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) The state or quality of being dorky

title: dorkiness


text: disserved

title: disserved


text: disjunctions

title: disjunctions


text: Empfängers

title: Empfängers


text: Senders

title: Senders


text: Empfangs

title: Empfangs


text: Empfänge

title: Empfänge


text: Sozialschmarotzers

title: Sozialschmarotzers


text: Schmarotzers

title: Schmarotzers


text: sozialer

title: sozialer


text: sozialsten

title: sozialsten


text: Soziologien

title: Soziologien


text:
disserve

Etymology
, from +.

Verb

 * 1) To treat poorly; to do a disservice to

Translations

 * Bulgarian: правя лоша услуга

title: disserve


text: Nahrungsketten

title: Nahrungsketten


text: drivelines

title: drivelines


text: Embryos

title: Embryos


text: dualists

title: dualists


text: őssejtkutatások

title: őssejtkutatások


text: Antikörpers

title: Antikörpers


text: Arzneimittels

title: Arzneimittels


text: Medikaments

title: Medikaments


text: Medikamentes

title: Medikamentes


text: disinvited

title: disinvited


text: Medikamente

title: Medikamente


text: Augenarztes

title: Augenarztes


text: Blinddarms

title: Blinddarms


text: Blinddarmes

title: Blinddarmes


text: Blinddärme

title: Blinddärme


text: Blutgerinnsels

title: Blutgerinnsels


text: Bluts

title: Bluts


text: Blutes

title: Blutes


text: Blute

title: Blute


text: Blutbads

title: Blutbads


text: Blutbades

title: Blutbades


text: Blutbäder

title: Blutbäder


text: disinhibited

title: disinhibited


text: Massakers

title: Massakers


text: blutrünstiger

title: blutrünstiger


text: blutrünstigsten

title: blutrünstigsten


text:
disinhibit

Verb

 * 1) To remove an inhibition.

title: disinhibit


text: Rindfleischs

title: Rindfleischs


text: Schweinefleischs

title: Schweinefleischs


text: Fleischers

title: Fleischers


text: Hackfleischs

title: Hackfleischs


text: Frikadellen

title: Frikadellen


text: Gehackten

title: Gehackten


text: Hackepeters

title: Hackepeters


text: Zahnseiden

title: Zahnseiden


text: Zahnfeen

title: Zahnfeen


text:
hírtelevízió

Noun

 * 1) news channel

title: hírtelevízió


text: hírtelevíziók

title: hírtelevíziók


text: schneidiger

title: schneidiger


text: schneidigsten

title: schneidigsten


text: Bratapfels

title: Bratapfels


text: Bratäpfel

title: Bratäpfel


text: Bratpfannen

title: Bratpfannen


text: Schaukelstuhls

title: Schaukelstuhls


text: Schaukelstuhles

title: Schaukelstuhles


text: Rollstuhls

title: Rollstuhls


text: Rollstuhles

title: Rollstuhles


text: blutigsten

title: blutigsten


text: Dermatologen

title: Dermatologen


text: Eingriffs

title: Eingriffs


text: Eingriffes

title: Eingriffes


text: Eingriffe

title: Eingriffe


text: Einstellungen

title: Einstellungen


text: Endoskopien

title: Endoskopien


text: Endoskopes

title: Endoskopes


text: Endoskope

title: Endoskope


text: Endoskops

title: Endoskops


text: Luftspiegelungen

title: Luftspiegelungen


text: Spiegelungen

title: Spiegelungen


text: Blinddarmentzündungen

title: Blinddarmentzündungen


text: Appendizitiden

title: Appendizitiden


text: Lungenentzündungen

title: Lungenentzündungen


text: Facharztes

title: Facharztes


text: Fachärzte

title: Fachärzte


text: Fieberthermometers

title: Fieberthermometers


text: Frauenarztes

title: Frauenarztes


text:
disinhibition

Noun

 * 1) A lack or loss of inhibition.

Translations

 * French:

title: disinhibition


text:
beiktatás

Noun

 * 1) inauguration

title: beiktatás


text: bog bilberries

title: bog bilberries


text: beiktatások

title: beiktatások


text: northern bilberries

title: northern bilberries


text: alapítványok

title: alapítványok


text: alapfémek

title: alapfémek


text: nemesfémek

title: nemesfémek


text: alapok

title: alapok


text: legeslegalaposabb

title: legeslegalaposabb


text:
diclofenac

Etymology
From the systematic name 2-(2-(2,6-dichlorophenylamino)phenyl)acetic acid.

Noun

 * 1)  A painkiller having the chemical formula C$14$H$11$Cl$2$NO$2$

Translations

 * Finnish: diklofenaakki

title: diclofenac


text: alaposabb

title: alaposabb


text: legalaposabb

title: legalaposabb


text: determinates

title: determinates


text: alanyesetek

title: alanyesetek


text: determinables

title: determinables


text:
beiktat

Verb

 * 1)  to inaugurate, install to admit someone formally into an office, rank or position

title: beiktat


text: alakok

title: alakok


text: aktatáskák

title: aktatáskák


text: alkalmazások

title: alkalmazások


text: aligátorok

title: aligátorok


text: defensives

title: defensives


text: Sar.

title: Sar.


text: allergiák

title: allergiák


text: alkonyatok

title: alkonyatok


text: alkoholizmusok

title: alkoholizmusok


text: alkoholok

title: alkoholok


text: alkimisták

title: alkimisták


text:
kongresszus

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) congress

title: kongresszus


text: kongresszusok

title: kongresszusok


text: abszurdumok

title: abszurdumok


text: absztraktságok

title: absztraktságok


text: abszintok

title: abszintok


text: abroszok

title: abroszok


text: abroncsok

title: abroncsok


text: vakablakok

title: vakablakok


text: decisionmaking

title: decisionmaking


text:
szenátus

Etymology
From. With ending.

Noun

 * 1) senate

title: szenátus


text: szenátusok

title: szenátusok


text: agancsok

title: agancsok


text: agák

title: agák


text: adások

title: adások


text: adományok

title: adományok


text: decadelong

title: decadelong


text: daytrippers

title: daytrippers


text:
dartlike

Adjective

 * 1) Resembling the movement of a thrown dart: swift and abrupt

title: dartlike


text: dabblings

title: dabblings


text: aggályok

title: aggályok


text: agyhártyák

title: agyhártyák


text: agyagok

title: agyagok


text: agyhártyagyulladások

title: agyhártyagyulladások


text: aikidók

title: aikidók


text: ajándéktárgyak

title: ajándéktárgyak


text: emléktárgyak

title: emléktárgyak


text: szuvenírek

title: szuvenírek


text: akadálytalanabb

title: akadálytalanabb


text: legakadálytalanabb

title: legakadálytalanabb


text: legeslegakadálytalanabb

title: legeslegakadálytalanabb