text:
matricida

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) A person who kills his own mother, matricide.

title: matricida


text: secondary color

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: secondary color


text:
amaçsızca

Etymology
From.

Adverb

 * 1) aimlessly

title: amaçsızca


text: Category:Latin terms suffixed with -cida


text:
нудити

Etymology
.

Verb

 * 1)  to offer
 * 2)  to bid

Etymology
, from, from. .

Verb

 * 1)  to bore
 * 2)  to be bored
 * 3)  to feel nauseous, to puke, to vomit
 * 4)  to be tired of, to be sick of
 * 5)  to whine, to complain, to moan
 * 6)  to annoy, to irritate, to bother
 * 7)  to exhaust, to wear out
 * 8)  to force, to compel
 * 1)  to exhaust, to wear out
 * 2)  to force, to compel
 * 1)  to force, to compel
 * 1)  to force, to compel

title: нудити


text:
tølt

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) a gait unique to the Icelandic horse

title: tølt


text: tølten

title: tølten


text:
破城槌

Noun

 * 1) battering ram

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) battering ram

title: 破城槌


text: raksua

title: raksua


text:
դղեակ

Etymology
Abulaje connects with 🇨🇬 and derives both from an  source. Found also in other Kartvelian languages: 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬. This is accepted by Ačaṙean, who specifies that the Armenian is borrowed from Early and the Georgian from Late 🇨🇬 because of the well-known k → g development in Middle Persian. He also adduces 🇨🇬 as borrowed from Late 🇨🇬.

The sense development “fortress” → “dungeon” is common. Compare 🇨🇬.

For a possible explanation of the Iranian etymon, compare 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬 and the suffix.

Noun

 * 1) fortress, fort
 * 2) dungeon

title: դղեակ


text:
изнудити

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to extort

title: изнудити


text:
iznuđivati

Verb

 * 1)  to extort

title: iznuđivati


text:
изнуђивати

Verb

 * 1)  to extort

title: изнуђивати


text:
sauvoa

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to pole to propel by pushing with poles, to push with a pole

title: sauvoa


text:
ponuditi

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to offer, to put forward
 * 2)  to help oneself (to something, especially food or service)

title: ponuditi


text:
selkópur

Etymology
From and.

Noun

 * 1) a seal pup, a young seal

title: selkópur


text:
понудити

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to offer

title: понудити


text:
rouhia

Etymology
From (compare 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬), borrowed from  (compare 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬), from  (compare 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬).

Verb

 * 1) to grind coarsely, to kibble

title: rouhia


text:
vieroa

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) To shun.

title: vieroa


text:
благајна

Noun

 * 1) safe, vault
 * 2) pay office (аn office or department of an enterprise or institution where payment and disbursement of funds are made)
 * 3) ticket office (an office where tickets may be purchased)

Noun

 * 1) cash register

title: благајна


text:
muksia

Verb

 * 1)  to clobber

title: muksia


text:
útselur

Noun

 * 1) a gray seal, a grey seal

title: útselur


text:
полуга

Noun

 * 1) lever

title: полуга


text:
matricidium

Noun

 * 1) The murder of one's mother, matricide.

title: matricidium


text:
մանեակ

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) necklace, collar
 * 2) port; harbour

title: մանեակ


text:
грлица

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) turtledove

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) turtle dove

title: грлица


text:
grličji

Adjective

 * 1)  turtle dove

title: grličji


text:
грличји

Adjective

 * 1)  turtle dove

title: грличји


text:
vöðuselur

Noun

 * 1) a harp seal

title: vöðuselur


text:
канибал

Noun

 * 1) cannibal

Noun

 * 1) cannibal

title: канибал


text:
Şahmeran

Etymology
From.

Proper noun

 * 1) Sahmaran, Shameran. A character in Anatolian mythology representing the goddess of wisdom and the guardian of the secrets and is considered as an anthropomorphic figure with a female head on a snake body with six legs and a tail.

title: Şahmeran


text:
markkinat

Etymology
Borrowed from.

Noun

 * 1) market
 * 2) fair, funfair event for public entertainment and trade

Etymology
Borrowed from.

title: markkinat


text:
људождер

Noun

 * 1) human cannibal
 * 2) man-eater

title: људождер


text:
људождерство

Noun

 * 1)  human cannibalism

title: људождерство


text:
yamyam

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) an incantation

Verb

 * 1) to recite a prayer or incantation
 * 2) to mumble
 * 3) to talk aimlessly

Noun

 * 1) nightmare

Etymology
From meaning also “Niam-Niam”, an obsolete name used by 18th- and 19th-century French and British travellers for the, an ethnic group of North Central Africa. The name is said to mean “great eaters” in the language, supposedly referring to cannibalistic propensities formerly ascribed to the Azande.

Noun

 * 1) cannibal

title: yamyam


text:
возач

Noun

 * 1) driver
 * 2) transporter

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) driver, chauffeur

Noun

 * 1) driver (person who drives a motorized vehicle)

title: возач


text:
возачица

Noun

 * 1) driver (person who drives a motorized vehicle)

title: возачица


text:
vozački

Adjective

 * 1)  driving, driver

Adverb

 * 1) like a driver

title: vozački


text:
возачки

Adjective

 * 1)  driving, driver

Adjective

 * 1)  driving, drivers

Adverb

 * 1) like a driver

title: возачки


text:
тратинчица

Noun

 * 1)  daisy

title: тратинчица


text:
մանյակ

Etymology 1
From ; see it for more.

Noun

 * 1) necklace, collar

Etymology 2
From.

Noun

 * 1) maniac

title: մանյակ


text:
човјекољубив

Adjective

 * 1) philanthropic (loving or helping mankind)

title: човјекољубив


text:
čovekoljubiv

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) philanthropic (loving or helping mankind)

title: čovekoljubiv


text:
маньяк

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) maniac

title: маньяк


text:
pub-crawl

Verb

 * 1)  to visit, and drink in, numerous pubs or bars in succession.

title: pub-crawl


text:
човекољубив

Adjective

 * 1) philanthropic
 * 2) merciful

Adjective

 * 1) philanthropic (loving or helping mankind)

title: човекољубив


text:
User talk:Revolver~enwiktionary

STEN WIKING   TILL DET HÖGRE MEDVETANDET

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Revolver. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Revolver~enwiktionary that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 00:08, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 07:25, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Revolver~enwiktionary


text:
juohtua

Etymology
Dialectal variant of (< ).

Verb

 * 1) to come up, arise.

title: juohtua


text:
მანიაკი

Etymology 1
From, from or directly from the source of the latter.

Noun

 * 1)  necklace

Etymology 2
, from.

Noun

 * 1) maniac

title: მანიაკი


text:
որդեակ

Noun

 * 1) little child, boy or girl

title: որդեակ


text:
karvoa

Verb

 * 1) to unhair

title: karvoa


text:
puckster

Noun

 * 1)  An ice hockey player.

title: puckster


text:
unhair

Verb

 * 1)  To remove hair from (something), especially from hide.
 * 2)  To become free from hair.
 * 1)  To become free from hair.
 * 1)  To become free from hair.

Translations

 * Finnish:

title: unhair


text: kuukkia

title: kuukkia


text: kykkiä

title: kykkiä


text:
որդյակ

Etymology
From.

title: որդյակ


text:
laukkoa

Etymology
From.

title: laukkoa


text:
levollisuus

Noun

 * 1) tranquility, calm

title: levollisuus


text:
laahia

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) To hone.

title: laahia


text:
matrimonium

Etymology
From. Compare with.

Noun

 * 1) marriage, matrimony, wedlock.

Descendants

 * Old Francoprovençal: matremonio, matrimonio
 * Old Francoprovençal: matremonio, matrimonio
 * Old Francoprovençal: matremonio, matrimonio

title: matrimonium


text: oleksia

title: oleksia


text:
pull in

Verb

 * 1)  To pull something, so that it comes inside.
 * 2)  To approach or drive up to a place and come to a stop; to park by driving frontways into a parking spot.
 * 3)  To approach a station; to arrive at a station.
 * 4)  To arrest someone; to take someone to a police station because they may have done something.
 * 5)  To earn [money].
 * 6)  To tighten a sail by pulling on a rope.
 * 1)  To arrest someone; to take someone to a police station because they may have done something.
 * 2)  To earn [money].
 * 3)  To tighten a sail by pulling on a rope.
 * 1)  To tighten a sail by pulling on a rope.
 * 1)  To tighten a sail by pulling on a rope.

Translations

 * Indonesian:
 * Portuguese: puxar para dentro

 * Bulgarian:
 * Indonesian:
 * Portuguese: ,

 * Indonesian:

 * Bulgarian:
 * Indonesian:, ,

 * Bulgarian:, зарифявам
 * Indonesian: ,

title: pull in


text:
грлити

Etymology
See.

Verb

 * 1)  to hug
 * 2)  to embrace

title: грлити


text:
ohittua

Verb

 * 1)  To be passed.

title: ohittua


text:
загрлити

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to hug
 * 2)  to embrace

title: загрлити


text:
სენაკი

Etymology
From, together with 🇨🇬 borrowed from. Cognate with 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1)  small chamber (for priests, nuns and others)

title: სენაკი


text:
Talk:pull in

Missing definitions

 * 1) pull in punters/pull in investors
 * 2) pull in your muscle
 * 3) some surfing thing

title: Talk:pull in


text:
raksahdella

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  To crackle.

title: raksahdella


text:
загрљај

Noun

 * 1) hug, embrace

title: загрљај


text:
matrimonialis

Etymology
From, from.

Adjective

 * 1) Of or pertaining to marriage, matrimonial.

title: matrimonialis


text:
զօրեղ

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) strong, vigorous; powerful; energetic, pathetic; possible, efficacious; valorous

title: զօրեղ


text:
mjehur

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) bubble
 * 2)  bladder
 * 3) blister

title: mjehur


text:
мјехур

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) bubble
 * 2)  bladder
 * 3) blister

title: мјехур


text: զաւրեղ

title: զաւրեղ


text:
мехур

Etymology
..

Noun

 * 1) bubble
 * 2) blister
 * 3)  bladder, vesica

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) bubble
 * 2)  bladder
 * 3) blister

title: мехур


text:
mjehurast

Adjective

 * 1) bubble-like

title: mjehurast


text:
meteli

Etymology
, possibly from the same onomatopoeic root as in and. Has also been proposed to be a borrowing from, but the semantic gap makes this unlikely.

Noun

 * 1) noise, racket
 * 2)  a crime of intentionally endangering public safety or making a threat of violence against a public officer
 * 1)  a crime of intentionally endangering public safety or making a threat of violence against a public officer
 * 1)  a crime of intentionally endangering public safety or making a threat of violence against a public officer

title: meteli


text:
мјехураст

Adjective

 * 1) bubble-like

title: мјехураст


text:
mehurast

Adjective

 * 1) bubble-like

title: mehurast


text:
мехураст

Adjective

 * 1) bubble-like

title: мехураст


text:
զորեղ

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) powerful, mighty
 * 2) influential, effective
 * 3) sturdy, stout, robust
 * 4) fierce, ferocious
 * 5) irresistible, uncontrollable
 * 6) certain, sure
 * 7) vigorous, lively, energetic
 * 8)  irrefutable, indisputable, undeniable
 * 9) consequential, far-reaching
 * 10) weighty, heavy

title: զորեղ


text:
mjehurić

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) a small bubble; vesicle
 * 1) a small bubble; vesicle

title: mjehurić


text:
мјехурић

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) a small bubble; vesicle
 * 1) a small bubble; vesicle

title: мјехурић


text:
mehurić

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) a small bubble; vesicle
 * 1) a small bubble; vesicle

title: mehurić


text: äkeillä

title: äkeillä


text:
мехурић

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) a small bubble; vesicle
 * 1) a small bubble; vesicle

title: мехурић


text:
äkäillä

Verb

 * 1)  to be cranky

title: äkäillä


text:
matrimus

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) That has a living mother.

Declension

 * Note that the quantity of the second syllable is doubtful.

title: matrimus


text:
äveriöityä

Verb

 * 1) to become wealthy

title: äveriöityä


text:
հիւթեղ

Adjective

 * 1) full of humours, plethoric; juicy, succulent

title: հիւթեղ


text:
slojevit

Adjective

 * 1) stratified (in layers)

title: slojevit


text:
слојевит

Adjective

 * 1) stratified (in layers)

title: слојевит


text:
taottaa

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to have forged by a smith

title: taottaa


text:
слој

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) layer
 * 2)  stratum
 * 3) coat, coating (of paint, etc.)

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) layer
 * 2) stratum

title: слој


text: kalpler

title: kalpler


text:
հյութեղ

Etymology
From ; see it for more.

Adjective

 * 1) juicy, sappy, succulent

title: հյութեղ


text:
tunteeton

Adjective

 * 1) callous, impassive, insensitive, immovable

title: tunteeton


text:
säikäyttää

Verb

 * 1)  to scare, startle, make (someone) jump

title: säikäyttää


text:
počast

Noun

 * 1) honor, honors
 * 2) respect, homage, reverence

title: počast


text:
почаст

Noun

 * 1) honor, honors
 * 2) respect, homage, reverence

title: почаст


text:
gönül

Etymology
From, , from , from. Cognate with 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬 and 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1)  heart, soul
 * 2) consent, will

title: gönül


text: gönlü

title: gönlü


text:
selkäpii

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) The ridge of backbone.

Etymology
From. Akin to 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) backbone

title: selkäpii


text: gönüller

title: gönüller


text:
liekehtiä

Verb

 * 1) To flame, blaze

title: liekehtiä


text:
sivakka

Etymology
From a language, compare 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) ski
 * 2)  right, shorter ski

title: sivakka


text:
-եղէն

Etymology
From +. The latter is either from  or from, with a dialectal sound change.

title: -եղէն


text:
matronalis

Etymology
From, from.

Adjective

 * Of, pertaining to or befitting a married woman or matron; womanly, matronly.

title: matronalis


text:
բոցեղէն

Adjective

 * 1) of flame, luminous

Noun

 * 1) angel

title: բոցեղէն


text:
matronatus

Etymology
From, from.

Noun

 * 1) The dress of a matron or lady of rank.

title: matronatus


text:
բոցեղեն

Etymology
From ; see it for more.

Adjective

 * 1) fiery, flaming
 * 2) flaring

title: բոցեղեն


text: Category:Old Armenian terms suffixed with -եղէն


text:
şapkacı

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) hatter

title: şapkacı


text: şapkacılar

title: şapkacılar


text: şapkacıyı

title: şapkacıyı


text:
հողեղէն

Adjective

 * 1) earthen
 * 2) terrestrial, earthly

title: հողեղէն


text:
matronaliter

Etymology
From, from + , from.

Adverb

 * 1) like a matron

title: matronaliter


text:
savaşçı

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) warrior

title: savaşçı


text: savaşçılar

title: savaşçılar


text: savaşçıyı

title: savaşçıyı


text:
հրեղէն

Adjective

 * 1) of fire, fiery, igneous
 * 2) empyreal, celestial, spiritual, angelic

title: հրեղէն


text:
Talk:yellowishly

Request for verification
The definition says "In a yellowish way". How can a way be yellowish? Does this make any sense?--Yair rand 06:34, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

 * From a book: "The sugar mill worker yellowishly tinges all that he touches merely by touching it." He tinges it in a yellowish way. Equinox ◑ 08:51, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

 * As far as RFV goes: now cited. Equinox ◑ 14:58, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

 * I changed "way" to "manner" which, I think, is a slightly more flexible term. -- WikiPedant 14:19, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

 * That quotation doesn't support the definition at all. From that quotation (alone), it looks like this means “with yellow”. Yellowish is the result, not the way or manner. —Michael Z. 2009-08-09 01:28 z

 * Passed with a tweak to the definition. Equinox ◑ 18:03, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:yellowishly


text:
Talk:no brain

Request for verification
Top Cat. British for "a stupid person" (i.e. "he is a no brain", not "he has no brain"). Hyphen? Attestable outside the playground? Equinox ◑ 08:49, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Playgrounds are very respectable... But you can find examples outside playgrounds, e.g. Imao, he is such a joker, a blatent khan hater, he is a no brain, and needs to be band, or at least banished to the mma forum (www.eastsideboxing.com). Lmaltier 18:29, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

 * Per WT:CFI, then? All I could find was an attributive sort of usage on rec.sport.golf: "start talking about what a no brain, classless guy he is". Equinox ◑ 10:02, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

 * Deleted. Equinox ◑ 18:06, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:no brain


text:
Talk:parisome

Request for verification
French for warbler. Can anyone confirm/deny? < class="latinx">Ƿidsiþ 09:49, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The French Wiktionary has it, and Parisome says yes as well, albeit as a redirect to the Latin name. Mglovesfun (talk) 12:31, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

 * has several hits, but they're all either:
 * not visible
 * not French (including one scanno)
 * using it, capitalized, as a genus name
 * and some fall into more than one of these categories.
 * —Ruakh TALK 22:01, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Avibase : the world bird data base has 12 answers in French for "parisome". --Szyx 12:18, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I think I should apologize now. Yes it seems very rare in French, most of the hits are from the French Wikipedia and its mirror sites. Some sort of long-running joke? I'm baffled to be honest. Mglovesfun (talk) 22:23, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * No long-running joke here. Confirmed also by Dictionnaire Universel d'Histoire Naturelle de 1847 (1847 universal dictionary of natural history). See the "parinées" entry. — Xavier, 12:48, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

RFV failed, entry deleted. I have seen no evidence that is a French noun meaning “warbler”. However, I've now created an entry for, which is or has been a French proper noun denoting the genus Parisoma. I'm not sure what its gender is, and I'm not sure if it needs a context label; y'all are welcome to have at it. —Ruakh TALK 16:41, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:parisome


text:
Talk:etter

Request for verification
German section. Never heard of that one, doesn't really match up with German phonology either. -- Prince Kassad 11:26, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, very strange. I've also never heard of a tense called "present imperfect", LOL. Anyway, this can't be correct. The verb etteren might exist, though. – Krun 23:49, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

RFV failed, German section removed. —Ruakh TALK 16:42, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:etter


text:
ոսկեղէն

Adjective

 * 1) golden, of gold, gilded, gilt

title: ոսկեղէն


text: ağzı

title: ağzı


text:
Talk:Dennis the Menace

Request for verification
Needs attributive use. DCDuring TALK 23:38, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

 * RFV failed, entry deleted. —Ruakh TALK 17:00, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:Dennis the Menace


text: ağızlar

title: ağızlar


text:
Talk:commentard

Request for verification
Protologism? Needs a better definition if OK. SemperBlotto 13:04, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

 * RFV failed, entry deleted. —Ruakh TALK 17:07, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:commentard


text:
Talk:ceterum censeo

Request for verification
Rfv-sense: I don't think that this found in English running text except in quotes or italics. If it is, the citations would help determine its meaning in English use. DCDuring TALK 02:33, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

 * RFV failed, English section removed. (Though for the record, I don't think that italics actually disqualify a cite.) —Ruakh TALK 03:13, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:ceterum censeo


text:
Talk:swim with sharks

Request for verification
Rfv-sense: "to take a huge risk". Isn't this usually used more specifically to refer to dangerous, predatory people? DCDuring TALK 20:18, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

 * RFV failed, sense removed. (And yes, I agree.) —Ruakh TALK 21:24, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:swim with sharks


text:
Talk:douze

Request for verification
rfv-usage notes which if verified should count as an interjection, if not should be removed, they read as follows: "Douze has recently been adopted by many Internet users as an expression of approval."

I've never heard of it, though I don't really use chatrooms. Mglovesfun (talk) 20:54, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

I have heard this used all over London. Paul Smithson

 * RFV failed, usage note removed. —Ruakh TALK 03:25, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:douze


text:
Talk:hole-whole merger

Request for verification
No hits on b.g.c; I think this name was made up on Wikipedia. Angr 20:46, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

 * RFV failed, entry deleted. —Ruakh TALK 17:10, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:hole-whole merger


text:
Talk:3W

Request for verification
En-abbreviation World Wide Web. I don't see it in use. —Michael Z. 2009-08-17 06:38 z

 * Deleted. Equinox ◑ 18:09, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:3W


text:
հողեղեն

Etymology
From ; see it for more.

Adjective

 * 1) earthly, mortal, perishable
 * 2) earthen

title: հողեղեն


text:
հրեղեն

Etymology
From ; see it for more.

Adjective

 * 1) fiery, igneous

title: հրեղեն


text: brylluppet

title: brylluppet


text: bryllupper

title: bryllupper


text: bryllupperne

title: bryllupperne


text: bryllups

title: bryllups


text:
deney tüpü

Etymology

 * From "deney" (experiment) + "tüp" (tube)

Noun

 * 1)  test tube

title: deney tüpü


text: brylluppets

title: brylluppets


text: brylluppers

title: brylluppers


text: brylluppernes

title: brylluppernes


text: deney tüpünü

title: deney tüpünü


text:
Talk:progasm

Request for verification
It's in the Jargon File (which is in the PD), but I'm not seeing sufficient use (on cursory examination). — msh210  ℠  22:45, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

 * The Jargon File is full of shit, honestly. It's just a list of words that Eric Raymond and his friends used for a little while. It always distresses me to see people cite it as though it's some kind of respectable dictionary of words anyone actually uses. Equinox ◑ 21:47, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

 * I've searched, but while there are certainly plenty of mentions with reference to the Jargon File, I don't see any real independent uses. This will probably fail. Dominic·t 06:48, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

 * Deleted. Equinox ◑ 18:19, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:progasm


text: deney tüpleri

title: deney tüpleri


text:
Talk:rainbow

Request for verification
"Special, enigmatic". Equinox ◑ 00:20, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Deleted. Equinox ◑ 18:20, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

RFV 2
Three newly-added senses: "(US) (American countercultural/contemporary.) Mellow, laid back, peaceful; (US) (American countercultural/contemporary.)Non-racist; (US) (American countercultural/contemporary.)Racially or ethnically blended." Also remember they need to show adjectival use and not just attributive! Equinox ◑ 23:28, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The third one sounds ok to me, as in "rainbow culture". The second one sounds like a closely related sense, the first one, no idea. Mglovesfun (talk) 23:32, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Looking at and  this would pass. I think a better definition would be multicultural and/or ethnically varied (or multi-ethnic?). There seem to be a LGBT sense as well, such as 'In Taipei, gay and lesbian entrepreneurs have joined together to form a "rainbow community."'. Poker sense is ok, though I don't know the poker noun sense above it. Mglovesfun (talk) 23:56, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The original use of this in the US was explicitly multi-racial, multi-(skin)-colored, as in "white", "black", "brown", "red", and "yellow". I would find it hard to imagine applying the term to say "multicultural" China. DCDuring TALK 03:54, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * How many of any of the senses of "rainbow" are used as true adjectives? Most dictionaries don't have an adjective entry. DCDuring TALK 04:08, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Since rainbow doesn't mean "a non-racist" or "a member of the LGBT community", it can't be attributive use of a noun that doesn't exist. Compare with above. Mglovesfun (talk) 22:02, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
 * It would be nice to see how and when the meaning evolved to become more generalized from multiracial to diverse to any specific flavor of diverse. DCDuring TALK 22:37, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

 * I have changed the definition to fit the quotations and the above discussion. - -sche (discuss) 00:38, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

RFD
Rfd-redundant: "Having, or shining with, the colors of the rainbow: iridescent." redundant to "Multicoloured". Am I missing something here? Mglovesfun (talk) 23:33, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete sense per nom. Pretty clearly redundant. bd2412 T 17:41, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

deleted -- Liliana • 21:43, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

rainbow
Sense "A symbol for the LGBT movement.". I'm sure that the rainbow is used symbolically for lots of things. But that is not a definition of a rainbow. SemperBlotto (talk) 21:31, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
 * You're right, this is not a definition. Delete. -- Liliana • 21:33, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, not all truthful material is a definition. Mglovesfun (talk) 21:41, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - the correct place for it is rainbow#Adjective, which already has it (unless someone can find cites where people have used rainbow as a noun to mean "gay community"). Smurrayinchester (talk) 22:13, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. The dove is a symbol for peace, but that is not a separate sense line. Equinox ◑ 22:18, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. This sense is already listed under the adjective as Smurrayinchester rightly points out. ---> Tooironic (talk) 22:40, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

 * Deleted SemperBlotto (talk) 06:58, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Another meaning for the verb
Hello, I think there is another meaning for the verb. On this webpage, the caption of the video says "It was rainbowing for at least an hour on January 8th 2010." Could you add this meaning. Pamputt (talk) 18:10, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Noun sense: rainbow trout
The citation uses "rainbow" as plural, so we might need to make a note about that plural, for that sense. Equinox ◑ 04:27, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

title: Talk:rainbow


text:
Talk:ideo locator

Request for verification
Really? The Weekly World News seems to think so, but there must be better sources in the world. Equinox ◑ 18:36, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

 * Deleted: seems to be only their invention which has been quoted a few times. Equinox ◑ 18:26, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

 * Anyway shouldn't it be "idiolocator" rather than "ideolocator"?--98.114.178.63 04:00, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

title: Talk:ideo locator


text:
ոսկեղեն

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) golden, of gold, gilded, gilt

Noun

 * 1) golden wares; jewellery

title: ոսկեղեն


text:
Talk:phoneshot

Request for verification
Seems reasonable, but no proper hits on Google books. Is it a protologism? SemperBlotto 21:55, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

 * Striking, already deleted. Equinox ◑ 18:27, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:phoneshot


text:
Talk:management-cybernetics

Request for verification
Every attributive use I can find lacks the hyphen. Equinox ◑ 22:43, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

 * RFV failed, entry deleted. —Ruakh TALK 20:44, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:management-cybernetics


text:
Talk:ownshack

Request for verification
Supposedly "an idiot, normally female", from Irish óinseach. Equinox ◑ 19:13, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I can't cite this is any language. --Mglovesfun (talk) 20:45, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

 * Deleted. Equinox ◑ 18:29, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:ownshack


text:
Talk:klawchi

Request for verification
Even if this is used in English, I'd be surprised if the plural really is klawchiyya. Mglovesfun (talk) 12:14, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

 * Deleted. Equinox ◑ 18:32, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:klawchi


text:
Talk:phileraﬆ

Request for verification
I doubt that this spelling is attestable. There is one citation c. 1920s, however, so the same publisher might have used this in other works. DCDuring TALK 23:45, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

 * Plato’s Symposium is a well-known work, so this term is verified according to the second criterion for inclusion, as I noted when I created the entry. †  ﴾(u):Raifʻhār (t):Doremítzwr﴿ 00:57, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

 * But not necessarily any individual translation/type-setting. DCDuring TALK 01:14, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

 * How else could it apply? Anglophones read The Republic, not Πολιτεία. †  ﴾(u):Raifʻhār (t):Doremítzwr﴿ 01:21, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

 * Doremítzwr is not without precedent in making this claim, as others have claimed "well known work" status from translations of well known works (see the rfv discussion of this entry). Quite frankly, until that particular unit of CFI is clarified, I think his argument stands.  However, I also tend to think that any translation of a well known work should not automatically qualify as a well known work itself, especially regarding something like this.  In any case, I do not think this issue is likely to be resolved here.  A conclusive BP discussion (and likely a vote as well) on "well known work" vs. "translation of a well known work" is required to settle this.  -Atelaes λάλει ἐμοί 01:40, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

 * I think that this point of typography attestation is an extra remove from the well-known work. It is a particular typesetting of a particular translation. Would any content of the translator's foreword to some edition of Plato be thereby automatically included as from a well-known work. That seems simply preposterous. DCDuring TALK 02:12, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

 * Yes, well, “Would any content of the translator's foreword to some edition of Plato be thereby automatically included as from a well-known work[?]” doesn’t apply, since the quotation in question is part of the Symposium proper. I used Hobbes’ Leviathan, and only the Leviathan, to attest, and I would have to flatly deny that such a thing is preposterous. †  ﴾(u):Raifʻhār (t):Doremítzwr﴿ 02:37, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

 * It is a quite analogous situation. The decisions of a book designer or typographer are as far removed from from what made the work well-known as the words of the foreword or the text on the book jacket. This is making a mockery of the concept of a well-known work. Please provide adequate citation for this headword. DCDuring TALK 10:11, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

 * Another issue which this raises is that of orthographical normalization. In Latin, entries do not have macrons in the entry title.  No matter how many times you might find a work quoting a word with a macron in it, it doesn't count for inclusion.  Similarly, for Ancient Greek, there are multiple characters for theta (θ and ϑ), among others.  Words are only spelled with the first theta, simply because that is the only allowed theta for Ancient Greek words.  If we decide that ﬆ is not meaningfully different than st, we could decide to simply exclude it in entry titles altogether.  Certainly, this is tricky business, but it's something perhaps worth thinking about.  -Atelaes λάλει ἐμοί 11:45, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
 * That sounds like a good way to go, unless someone can show a difference between some ligatured word and the corresponding unligatured one. Hard redirect: we do it for apostrophes and other things. —  msh210  ℠  18:41, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

 * This entry should if anything be a hard redirect. You can't verify a typesetting artifact, I mean any number of books use (or used to use) the character under discussion, but we don't consider it a separate English letter (unlike æ for instance).  It's just a caprice of printers and in my opinion is not an ‘alternative’ spelling at all, just alternative Unicode codepoints used to render the same spelling.  < class="latinx">Ƿidsiþ 17:44, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

 * I'd go with a redirect too - last time I checked, Plato didn't write in 20th Century English, did he? Mglovesfun (talk) 22:57, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

I too would be fine with a hard redirect, just so long as the ligated spelling remains listed in the Alternative spellings section of. †  ﴾(u):Raifʻhār (t):Doremítzwr﴿ 23:05, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

 * I'd like to know if it is a real representation of the word. I'd like to know if it counts as a word. I'd like to know if typographical variants are worth spending screenspace on. I'd like to know whether these things are in any way attestable in a way compatible with our existing system. I had thought that this was an open-and-shut case of unverifiability. I hadn't realized that it is also fairly open-and-shut on WT:CFI (not a word, just a word representation).
 * If this one is accepted without attestation or a decision that it is worth including, then it may well be argued that it is a precedent for unattested deviant typography at every headword that contains "ae", "ff", "st", "oe", "ue", "ss", or any of the other character pairs and triplets type designers have spent time on. DCDuring TALK 23:22, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

 * It is no such precedent; this term is verified. Vertically speaking (which is what matters), retaining it takes no additional screen space. It seems reasonable to treat these like we do the conjugated forms of idioms — shown in the entry but hard-redirected from the actual page back to the lemma. †  ﴾(u):Raifʻhār (t):Doremítzwr﴿ 23:32, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

 * The term may be verified, but we don't have a policy of "all words in all font and orthographic styles". This is an orthographic variant, and not a different form or different spelling.  This should be a hard redirect, or preferrably deleted. --EncycloPetey 04:26, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

 * It's not even an orthographic variant, it's a typographic variant. We definitely shouldn't be using such ligatures to create separate entries; I certainly hope that ﬁsh and ﬂat turn out to be red links when I hit "Show preview", and if not, I certainly hope that they're redirects and not separate entries. Angr 10:41, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

 * Well, it seems like everyone except for Doremítzwr is down with not treating this as a separate word. If so, we really ought to write up a policy, and define which orthographic/typographic variants are considered illegal (I know, I know, this sounds so evil, as if such a list should go on the same shelf as a banned books list or something).  We should figure out exactly which Unicode characters we don't accept, and if it applies to all languages, or just English.  There are a lot of languages which use the Latin script, and some variants might be meaningless in some languages, but meaningless in others.  -Atelaes λάλει ἐμοί 11:49, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

 * No, as I said, I’m fine with hard-redirection, just not with deletion. There is at least one very important reason why we should not ban certain Unicode characters: On the Internet, efficient users are wont to copy-and-paste words whencesoever into search engines such as ours; such words may contain typographical ligatures such as and . If we don’t have the redirects in place, their searches will not return hits; the fact that, in many of the fonts that support them, these typographical ligatures look virtually identical with their unligated equivalent digraphs and trigraphs means that a user is quite likely not to think of going through the search term substituting them with their permitted character combinations. Of course, this is only an issue if the term exists in use with that ligated spelling, so to avoid clouds of redirects (which you’ve warned against in the past), even those hard-redirect entries would need to be attested. †  ﴾(u):Raifʻhār (t):Doremítzwr﴿ 16:37, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

 * Yes, it definitely matters which language we're talking about! I don't think we should be using "æ" for Latin or Modern English, but we should certainly use it for Norwegian, Danish, and Old English. Likewise, despite the Modern Irish penchant for dotless lowercase i's in signage (see for example File:Gaeltacht Donegal cropped.jpg), we shouldn't use "ı" for Irish, though of course we should use it for Turkish and Azeri. Angr 12:26, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

 * Sorry; let me know if I understood you properly: Do you propose that we delete or hard-redirect English entries spelt with undefined: or undefined:? You mention Danish; note that there are a number of initial terms in English that are homographic with Danish terms. †  ﴾(u):Raifʻhār (t):Doremítzwr﴿ 16:37, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

 * And so we come back to the reason why hard redirects are seldom feasible on Wiktionary... I'm inclined to think that we cannot hard-redirect any ligatures that are potentially significant in some language. On the other hand, are there any languages where the st, fi, ffi, &c. ligatures are distinct from the separate letters?  If not, I would favor hard-redirecting those (especially given Adobe's penchant for adding the fi, ffi, etc. ligatures to PDF files).-- Visviva 02:46, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

 * AFAIK, none of the ligatures I have listed in “Useful symbols yet to be added to MediaWiki:Edittools” > “Latin / Roman” signify any different semantic meaning from their digraphic or trigraphic equivalents (I may be wrong about the four Croatian ligatures). This is certainly not the case for the English ligatures, , , and : They are largely etymological in function, usually deriving from the Latin diphthongs undefined:, undefined: and/or the Ancient Greek diphthongs , ; terms of a different derivation — such as those from Germanic roots and Latinate or Græcian ones such as aetheogam: and each of the prefixed words — cannot properly be spelt with those ligatures. (Also note the occasional borrowing such as (from Old Norse) that cannot properly be spelt without ligation.)

 * As for how we deal with the typographical ligatures, indeed “given Adobe’s penchant for adding the fi, ffi, etc. ligatures to PDF files”, I think the proposal I wrote in reply to Atelaes above (timestamped 16:37, 11 September 2009) is simple and perfectly workable. As long as our requirements of attestation apply to them just like any other term, there shouldn’t be any problem. †  ﴾(u):Raifʻhār (t):Doremítzwr﴿ 13:26, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

 * I think a far better solution would be to teach the equivalencies to the MW software. It already auto-redirects A --> a, when appropriate.  Why can't we teach it to auto-redirect ﬆ --> st?  I would think that this would be a million times easier and more sustainable than creating a billion redirects for every typographic variant.  Of course, when legal characters in one language conflict with this in another, we can use  (e.g. if "ﬆ" is allowed in some language, and that language contains the word "phileraﬆ", we could have a  at the top).  -Atelaes λάλει ἐμοί 13:48, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

 * I doubt that any of these ligatures (ﬀ, ﬁ, ﬂ, ﬃ, ﬄ, ﬅ, and ﬆ) are “legal” characters in any language, given their inclusion in the “Alphabetic Presentation Forms” Unicode subset. Is teaching such equivalencies possible? †  ﴾(u):Raifʻhār (t):Doremítzwr﴿ 19:24, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Redirected to [[philerast]], which already has the quotation in question. —Ruakh TALK 18:55, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:phileraﬆ


text:
Talk:hoodwink

Request for verification
Rfv-sense: "to make up for." -- Visviva 09:26, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

 * Deleted. Equinox ◑ 18:36, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:hoodwink


text:
Talk:Chiayi

Request for verification
Keep --Anatoli 23:07, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

 * This also looks like an issue for RFD. I think it is safe to assume that the nominator is not questioning the existence of the term. -- Visviva 10:35, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

 * I wasn't rushing to add this to this page. I never would have noticed it if it had not shown up and lingered long in Category:Entries_with_level_or_structure_problems, as a dozen or so gazetteer entries have. I thought this was the page for attributive use attestation? Is this an entry that doesn't need it? I thought it would under current CFI. DCDuring TALK 12:15, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

 * IMO the problem is that there is no real consensus among editors as to what form of citation would be acceptable. Because the place-name criteria are poorly drafted and were never the product of consensus in the first place, opinions differ widely among editors as to a) what sort of citations are actually necessary under the criterion (byword?  etymon?  or any use as a noun adjunct?), and b) whether the criterion deserves any respect in the first place.  When there is no consensus on what form of attestation is needed, RFV cannot serve its intended purpose, and what should have been a simple matter of citation devolves into a flurry of "keeps" and "deletes" (vide supra).  Which is to say: whether we have this discussion on RFV or RFD, it's going to be an RFD discussion.  Having the discussion here just creates a mess for whatever poor soul ends up closing it.  -- Visviva 14:05, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

al place nams4inclsn!--史凡 >voice-MSN/skypeme!RSI>typin=hard! 16:02, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

 * RFV failed, entry deleted. —Ruakh TALK 01:52, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

 * Congratulations! You must be very proud, Ruakh. --Anatoli 02:56, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

 * I'm certainly not ashamed. —Ruakh TALK 03:09, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

 * Yes, I already said that you must be very proud deleting someone's work. Does the place not exist in your opinion or it doesn't exist in English? Why RFV has become a signal to delete the entry? What was wrong with it, do you care to explain - citations, significance, attributive usage? I need to know before you destroy more. Anatoli 03:37, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

 * Deleting well-written entries rarely if ever does anything at all to improve Wiktionary, but it is an effective means of driving away talented editors. —Stephen 06:02, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

 * Look, we have to have standards: standards of formatting, standards of accuracy, standards of verifiability, standards of relevance. By "well-written entries" I imagine you mean the first? But if an editor's "talent" is generating well-formatted entries that don't belong here, then I'm not sure what we can do. —Ruakh TALK 14:35, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

 * Citations demonstrating attributive usage. —Ruakh TALK 14:30, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Old RFV
Hey Ruakh. I saw some of your argumentation above. Does Chiayi pass RFV now? If not, I will keep adding sources/citations. I am engaged in a long-term plan to increase the reliability and scope of Wiktionary's coverage of geographical terms related to China and Taiwan. I have been doing it by adding images of maps; adding citations from books, journals, magazines and websites; attempting to clarify etymologies; and strictly differentiating alternative forms from synonyms. Let me know if you have any guidance you can give me. Thanks. --Geographyinitiative (talk) 17:02, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

RFV discussion: January 2021
I'm pretty sure that this term has now met the threshold, but there was an old decision where it failed RFV for some complex reasons. There were a lot of complex concepts on that page about usage in the attributive sense, etc etc. I'm not clear whether the citations I have given are good enough for Wiktionary. I can probably find more if needed for either sense. --Geographyinitiative (talk) 23:20, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedily kept. Please stop wasting our time. It failed RFV more than 11 years ago under radically different rules from those in force today. Your only guide to whether entries belong here should be WT:CFI. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 23:58, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
 * You wrote the statement "Please stop wasting our time." Slow down and look at this from my perspective. I want to know what I'm doing on Wiktionary and I want to know that the old RFV really doesn't have force anymore. What else should I do but check with this board? It wasn't a waste of time for me, because now I know that what I've done on the Chiayi page is apparently good enough. I'm not a Wiktionary policy wonk. I'm just trying to build a dictionary. Have mercy. --Geographyinitiative (talk) 01:04, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Actually, the Taiwanese meaning is not attested, having only one citation. Now that you have raised this RFV, it will be deleted in a month if we do not get two more. Kiwima (talk) 18:51, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Ok, I will work on it. --Geographyinitiative (talk) 18:54, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

cited Kiwima (talk) 20:08, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

RFV-passed Kiwima (talk) 21:03, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

 * Hey Kiwima- thanks for your responses to my RFVs. I want to make really solid cases for Wiktionary-grade attestation for the entries I'm making (based on strong cites), and you are really helping me a lot with understanding the logic of that process. Can I ask you: how the heck did the 'city' definition for Chiayi pass RFV in January? Which citations were "durably archived"? Did you believe/assume that the cites from 1) The Nation, 2) Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, and 3) Forbes were durably archived? Thanks for any help. --Geographyinitiative (talk) 10:50, 6 May 2021 (UTC) (modified)
 * Your welcome (I guess). I am probably not the best person to ask about what makes for a durably archived source. The strongest cites are the Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, and the 2007 book, Taiwan. The weakest is Aruba Today. Basically, if it appears in print as well as on line, you are probably safe. Academic journals are also good. Kiwima (talk) 20:17, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:Chiayi


text:
Talk:eng

Request for verification
Rfv-sense: abbreviation, in English, in lowercase, for "English" and "England". Note the ISO code is already covered under ==Translingual==. -- Visviva 10:33, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
 * How about rfd-redundant then? I mean it exists in English doesn't it? So it needs an rfd not an rfv right? Mglovesfun (talk) 06:48, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

 * Well, I assumed the definition was claiming that an English abbreviation existed independently of ISO -- that, say, in older dictionaries or somewhere "English" might be denoted as "eng(.)" rather than "Eng(.)" Even if that isn't what was meant, it seems plausible enough to be worth an RFV. -- Visviva 07:07, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

RFV failed, section removed. —Ruakh TALK 01:54, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:eng


text:
Talk:Benito Mussolini

Request for verification
Needs attributive citations, per WT:CFI. Mglovesfun (talk) 11:21, 2 October 2009 (UTC) keep w/short def>fuzzy boundary w/enc-pdia--史凡 >voice-MSN/skypeme!RSI>typin=hard! 14:11, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Name of a person - should be deleted (unless cited as above). I shall probably add Mussolini: though. SemperBlotto 11:26, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

 * RFV failed, entry deleted. —Ruakh TALK 01:55, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:Benito Mussolini


text:
Talk:pete

Request for verification
1. Bicycle accident. 2. Tennis stroke. Equinox ◑ 20:19, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

 * Deleted both. Equinox ◑ 18:42, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:pete


text:
Talk:bzuh

Request for verification
Expression of shock and confusion. Equinox ◑ 22:21, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

 * Deleted. Equinox ◑ 18:44, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:bzuh


text:
Talk:Albanya

Request for verification
As a given name in Basque, or in any language. I cannot find it in any dictionary, and only two persons in Ancestry.com, statistically equivalent to zero.--Makaokalani 12:56, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm removing the Basque entry.--Makaokalani 16:30, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

RFV failed, per Makaokalani. —Ruakh TALK 20:41, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:Albanya


text:
Talk:oat

Request for verification
UK sense just added by anon, slang for "sex." -- WikiPedant 00:50, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I'd assume this is related to the expression "sowing own's oats" (or "wild oats", etc.). I'm not sure it has this meaning outside of the expression. --EncycloPetey 02:59, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Total agreement - sense should be removed. SemperBlotto 07:18, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

 * Deleted. Equinox ◑ 19:04, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Etymology
Cognate with West Frisian OAT[8], Dutch OOT[8] - Dutch regional (West Flemish) ATE, OTE , (Zeeland) ŌTŌ , ŌŌTE, all in sense (‘wild oat’): (O.E.D); and Frisian OAT<English OAT; all of which, however, may be borrowed from English. There may be a possibility of a pre-Germanic origin[3], but with a similar sense[7]. Compare also Estonian OAD[4] (broad bean). Not to be connected with Welsh and Breton ĪD[2] (corn), (unless related to Scots Gaelic AD[3]); nor with Icelandic ÆTI[3], (an eatable). Dr. Skeat compares Norwegian EITEL[6], (a gland, knot, nodule); Icelandic EITILL[6], (nodule in stone); Russian IADRO[5], (kernel, ball); and lastly, but not least: Greek ṎIDOS[7], (swelling); mostly from Proto-Indo-European or earlier root *EID[6]. This root and that of the Estonian OAD (broad bean) ultimately answer to pre-historic √2Dh2R (ADhAR){11th February 2019} (to be wide, swell)[6]. Andrew H. Gray 10:30, 19 September 2015 (UTC) Andrew (talk) It must be understood that fossil vocabulary is still possible in the Nordic areas due to the proximity to Lapland whose dialects once covered Scandinavia. Therefore the presence of apparent related semanitics is not sufficient basis to assume a Germanic origin. Amended: Andrew H. Gray 12:44, 6 November 2017 (UTC) Andrew (talk)

[0] means 'Absolutely not; [1] means 'Exceedingly unlikely'; [2] means 'Very dubious'; [3] means 'Questionable'; [4] means 'Possible'; [5] means 'Probable'; [6] means 'Likely'; [7] means 'Most Likely' or *Unattested; [8] means 'Attested'; [9] means 'Obvious' - only used for close matches within the same language or dialect, at linkable periods. '2' stands for the laryngeal that takes the place of the 'ā' and 'a' that are missing. √ means original or earliest root. Look at the Old Turkish word OT. It means simply grass. The Uygur dialect calls it OOT, and this is in form and meaning the same like OAT. Isn't it? A word with an uncertain etymology could be explained like that, maybe.--UzunbacakAdem (talk) 13:28, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

 * That is a "cool" etymology. I can only suggest that you sign up for Academia and if you are so inclined to subscribe to the Premium stage (that I cannot do, since I have no online payment facilities) and download the papers on "GERMANIC SUBSTRATES", because I cannot find any for OAT.  There needs to be cognates in Welsh or Cornish, or from another Celtic dialect in Britain in order to link such a lexeme with a totally different language family as in Turkic; but there could be a remote connection in Bronze Age times with Welsh ĪD (corn) and ĀD in Gaelic.  Any substrate link would have to be Pre-Celtic and the suggested semantic roots in the main entry page and that of mine (above) would be quite irrelevant.  Andrew H. Gray 17:36, 7 December 2020 (UTC) Andrew (talk)

title: Talk:oat


text:
Talk:Britain and Northern Ireland

Request for verification
I don't think so. Wikipedia article does not exist. SemperBlotto 16:02, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
 * And the def is nonsense. Pingku 19:03, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete The user (Mr Taz) has been making unsourced and unattested entries/changes to existing entries. This is either a tasteless joke or he simply isn't aware of any guidelines in effect on Wiktionary.

 * Deleted. Equinox ◑ 19:09, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:Britain and Northern Ireland


text:
Talk:drunch

Request for verification
Tagged by Logomaniac. Looks like the arrantest nonsense to me. Equinox ◑ 16:23, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I didn't know whether it was attestable or not, didn't take time to check. Books search brings up a whole bunch of old (Old? Middle?) English literature ->  ...L☺g☺maniac chat? 16:28, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Deleted. Equinox ◑ 19:11, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:drunch


text:
Talk:pretgogga

Request for verification
Possibly somebody's protologism? No evidence on the Web that I can find. Equinox ◑ 15:19, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I was going to agree but check this out. I don't speak Finnish but the bottom of that page seems to reduplicate our entry.50 Xylophone Players talk 19:29, 24 October 2009 (UTC) in case you're curious, here's how I found that: I Googled "pretgogga" and that site came up then, thinking that *maybe* it was a word in Finnish if not in English I searched what I think was a Finnish-English dictionary.
 * Oh and look here's a French version. :) 50 Xylophone Players talk 19:43, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

 * These could possibly be spam sites using our free content to get visitors from search engines. Equinox ◑ 23:31, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

 * Deleted. Equinox ◑ 19:12, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:pretgogga


text:
Talk:fag enabler

Request for verification
Tagged for speedy deletion as a "attack page" which seems like nonsense to me. Who is it supposed to be attacking? Anyway, RFV seemed the only plausible option, as the page does like a bit dodgy. Mglovesfun (talk) 22:08, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the foul language but...I could be wrong although at best this seems to be fucking WBC bullshit. Try bgc maybe? 50 Xylophone Players talk 21:33, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The only Google Books match is quoting Phelps (of the WBC). I looked on Google Groups and found a rather small number of uses, mostly again quoting him or in reference to WBC stuff. So my hunch is that this hasn't spread enough to be properly citable. Equinox ◑ 21:30, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm not making a comment on the content, I'm just asking is it attestable? FWIW I can't guess the meaning from fag + enabler. If this fails, fag-enabler should go too. Mglovesfun (talk) 19:26, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Deleted. Equinox ◑ 19:13, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:fag enabler


text:
Talk:biotrauma

Request for verification
Per Equinox's comment at WT:TR. Looks bogus. Mglovesfun (talk) 17:29, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The current text looks bullshit, but the word seems to exist in other use. This article discusses biotrauma as a negative consequence of mechanical ventilation, when applied as medical treatment. Wikipedia article is in agreement with this.--Hekaheka 18:10, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

 * I've replaced our definition with Wikipedia's. Closing RFV. Equinox ◑ 17:24, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:biotrauma


text:
Talk:snakes in suits

Request for verification
attestable? 50 Xylophone Players talk 15:02, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I suspect promotional material, when it says in their book, Mglovesfun (talk) 16:10, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

 * Just the name of a book. No reliable idiomatic use. Deleted SemperBlotto 16:14, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I agree. Mglovesfun (talk)

title: Talk:snakes in suits


text:
Talk:beruby

Request for verification
I cleaned it up, no idea if it exists or not. Mglovesfun (talk) 16:08, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Total tosh. deleted SemperBlotto 16:12, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:beruby


text:
Talk:webonym

Request for verification
Mglovesfun (talk) 14:38, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
 * 60 Google hits, most from Urban Dictionary. Deleted. Mglovesfun (talk) 18:34, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:webonym


text:
silindir

Etymology
From, ultimately from , likely through.

Noun

 * 1) cylinder

title: silindir


text:
безјак

Noun

 * 1) Muggle (non-magical person in the works of J.K. Rowling)
 * 2)  a stupid person
 * 3)  a nickname that Čakavians and Štokavians give to Kajkavians

title: безјак


text:
marruca

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) Jerusalem thorn, Christ's thorn

title: marruca


text:
büyücü

Etymology
..

Noun

 * 1) magician, sorcerer, wizard

title: büyücü


text: büyücüyü

title: büyücüyü


text: büyücüler

title: büyücüler


text:
marrucheto

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) thicket of Jerusalem thorn, thicket of Christ's thorn

title: marrucheto


text:
büyü

Etymology 1
, from. Compare 🇨🇬.

Alternative forms

 * (chiefly Cyprus)

Noun

 * 1) charm, spell, magic

title: büyü


text: büyüyü

title: büyüyü


text: büyüler

title: büyüler


text:
masseto

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  rocky land

title: masseto


text:
ayakkabıcı

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) cobbler, shoemaker

title: ayakkabıcı


text:
çizmeci

Etymology
From. .

Noun

 * 1) bootmaker

title: çizmeci


text:
mirteto

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) common myrtle grove
 * 2) myrtle grove

title: mirteto


text: csizmadiák

title: csizmadiák


text:
noccioleto

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) hazel grove

title: noccioleto


text:
semitrasparenza

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) semitransparency

title: semitrasparenza


text:
semiufficiale

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) semi-official

title: semiufficiale


text:
semivestito

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) half-dressed
 * 2) half-naked

title: semivestito


text:
semivivo

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) half-alive
 * 2) half-dead

title: semivivo


text: nocciuola

title: nocciuola


text:
semivocale

Etymology
, a calque of. .

Noun

 * 1)  semivowel

title: semivocale


text:
semivocalico

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) semivocal, semivocalic

title: semivocalico


text: semialberi

title: semialberi


text: semianalfabetismi

title: semianalfabetismi


text: semicircoli

title: semicircoli


text: semiconvittori

title: semiconvittori


text: semicupi

title: semicupi


text: semideponenti

title: semideponenti


text: semidiametri

title: semidiametri


text: semiluni

title: semiluni


text: seminagioni

title: seminagioni


text: semiologi

title: semiologi


text: semionde

title: semionde


text: semiperimetri

title: semiperimetri


text: semiprofessionisti

title: semiprofessionisti


text: semiprofessioniste

title: semiprofessioniste


text: semirimorchi

title: semirimorchi


text: semiacerba

title: semiacerba


text: semisommatori

title: semisommatori


text: semiacerbi

title: semiacerbi


text: marruche

title: marruche


text: semiacerbe

title: semiacerbe


text: marrucheti

title: marrucheti


text: semibrada

title: semibrada


text: masseti

title: masseti


text: semibradi

title: semibradi


text: mirteti

title: mirteti


text: semibrade

title: semibrade


text: noccioleti

title: noccioleti


text: semicoperta

title: semicoperta


text: semicoperti

title: semicoperti


text: semitrasparenze

title: semitrasparenze


text: semicoperte

title: semicoperte


text: nocciuole

title: nocciuole


text: semidiafana

title: semidiafana


text: semivocali

title: semivocali


text: semidiafani

title: semidiafani


text: semidiafane

title: semidiafane


text: semidistesa

title: semidistesa


text: semidistesi

title: semidistesi


text: semidistese

title: semidistese


text: semidura

title: semidura


text: semiduri

title: semiduri


text: semidure

title: semidure


text: semifinita

title: semifinita


text: semifiniti

title: semifiniti


text: semigrassa

title: semigrassa


text: semigrassi

title: semigrassi


text: semigrasse

title: semigrasse


text: semigratuita

title: semigratuita


text: semigratuiti

title: semigratuiti


text: semigratuite

title: semigratuite


text: semilibera

title: semilibera


text: semiliberi

title: semiliberi


text: semilibere

title: semilibere


text: semiliquida

title: semiliquida


text:
bersò

Noun

 * 1) arbour, bower

title: bersò


text: semiliquidi

title: semiliquidi


text: semiliquide

title: semiliquide


text: seminabili

title: seminabili


text: seminariali

title: seminariali


text: seminativa

title: seminativa


text: seminativi

title: seminativi


text:
seminative

Adjective

 * 1) Somewhat or partly native.

title: seminative


text: seminferma

title: seminferma


text: seminfermi

title: seminfermi


text: seminferme

title: seminferme


text: seminifera

title: seminifera


text: seminiferi

title: seminiferi


text: seminifere

title: seminifere


text: seminomadi

title: seminomadi


text: semiologica

title: semiologica


text: semiologici

title: semiologici


text: semiologiche

title: semiologiche


text: semionciali

title: semionciali


text: onciali

title: onciali


text: semiopaca

title: semiopaca


text: semiopachi

title: semiopachi


text: semiopache

title: semiopache


text: semiovali

title: semiovali


text: semipresidenziali

title: semipresidenziali


text: berchelio

title: berchelio


text: semipreziosa

title: semipreziosa


text: semipreziosi

title: semipreziosi


text: semipreziose

title: semipreziose


text: semiprofessionali

title: semiprofessionali


text: semipubblica

title: semipubblica


text: semipubblici

title: semipubblici


text: semipubbliche

title: semipubbliche


text: semiraffinata

title: semiraffinata


text: semiraffinati

title: semiraffinati


text: semiraffinate

title: semiraffinate


text: semirigida

title: semirigida


text: semirigidi

title: semirigidi


text:
semirigide

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) semirigid

title: semirigide


text: semisecca

title: semisecca


text: semisecchi

title: semisecchi


text: semisecche

title: semisecche


text: semiselvaggia

title: semiselvaggia


text: semiselvaggi

title: semiselvaggi


text: semiselvagge

title: semiselvagge


text: semisolida

title: semisolida


text: semisolidi

title: semisolidi


text: semisolide

title: semisolide


text: semispenta

title: semispenta


text: semispenti

title: semispenti


text: semispente

title: semispente


text: semiufficiali

title: semiufficiali


text: semivestita

title: semivestita


text: semivestiti

title: semivestiti


text: semivestite

title: semivestite


text: semiviva

title: semiviva


text: semivivi

title: semivivi


text: semivive

title: semivive


text: semivocalica

title: semivocalica


text: semivocalici

title: semivocalici


text: semivocaliche

title: semivocaliche


text: berciando

title: berciando


text: berciante

title: berciante


text:
berciare

Etymology
.

Verb

 * 1)  to yell, to bawl
 * 2)  to sing badly
 * 3)  to sing (a song) badly

title: berciare


text: berciato

title: berciato


text: berciati

title: berciati


text: berciata

title: berciata


text: bercio

title: bercio


text: bercia

title: bercia


text: berciamo

title: berciamo


text: berciate

title: berciate


text:
berciano

Adjective

 * 1)  of El Bierzo

Noun

 * 1) someone from El Bierzo

title: berciano


text: berciavo

title: berciavo


text: berciavi

title: berciavi


text: berciava

title: berciava


text: berciavamo

title: berciavamo


text: berciavate

title: berciavate


text: berciavano

title: berciavano


text: berciai

title: berciai


text: berciasti

title: berciasti


text: berciò

title: berciò


text: berciammo

title: berciammo


text: berciaste

title: berciaste


text: berciarono

title: berciarono


text: bercerò

title: bercerò


text: bercerà

title: bercerà


text: berceremo

title: berceremo


text: bercerete

title: bercerete


text: berceranno

title: berceranno


text: bercerei

title: bercerei


text: berceresti

title: berceresti


text: bercerebbe

title: bercerebbe


text: berceremmo

title: berceremmo


text: bercereste

title: bercereste


text: bercerebbero

title: bercerebbero


text: bercino

title: bercino


text: berciassi

title: berciassi


text: berciasse

title: berciasse


text: berciassimo

title: berciassimo


text: berciassero

title: berciassero


text:
bernardino

Noun

 * 1) Bernardine

title: bernardino


text: User:Yair rand/WS sandbox

title: User:Yair rand/WS sandbox


text:
bernese

Etymology
From.

title: bernese


text:
bernoccoluto

Adjective

 * 1) bumpy, lumpy

title: bernoccoluto


text: marfileña

title: marfileña


text: marfileños

title: marfileños


text:
berrettaio

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) cap (beret) maker or seller

title: berrettaio


text: marfileñas

title: marfileñas


text:
bersaglieresco

Adjective

 * 1) bold, resolute

title: bersaglieresco


text:
bestiario

Etymology
, from.

Noun

 * 1) bestiary

Etymology
, from.

Noun

 * 1) bestiary

title: bestiario


text:
pellicano australiano

Noun

 * 1) Australian pelican

title: pellicano australiano


text:
floemo

Noun

 * 1) phloem

title: floemo


text: floemoj

title: floemoj


text: floemon

title: floemon


text: floemojn

title: floemojn


text: shit-ton

title: shit-ton


text:
ksilemo

Noun

 * 1) xylem

title: ksilemo


text: ksilemoj

title: ksilemoj


text: ksilemon

title: ksilemon


text: 锻造

title: 锻造


text: ksilemojn

title: ksilemojn


text:
鍛造

Verb

 * 1)  to hammer into shape; to forge

title: 鍛造


text:
run wild

Verb

 * 1)  To go unchecked, to be out of control.
 * 2)  To run consecutively.

title: run wild


text:
antennule

Noun

 * 1)  A small antenna.

Derived terms

 * antennulate
 * antennuliform
 * antennuliform

Translations

 * Irish: aintéinín
 * Italian: antennula
 * Portuguese: anténula, antênula

title: antennule


text:
antennular

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1)  of or relating to antennules or an antennule

Translations

 * Irish: aintéiníneach
 * Portuguese: antenular

title: antennular


text:
smeka

Etymology
, from. Cognate with 🇨🇬. .

Verb

 * 1)  to touch gently and lovingly; to caress, pet

title: smeka


text:
push in

Verb

 * 1)  To jump the queue, especially in a forceful manner.

Noun

 * 1)  A zoom in which the camera physically moves towards the subject

Antonyms

 * pull back

title: push in


text:
skydd

Etymology 1
.

Noun

 * 1) a protection; something that covers or protects
 * 2) a cover; something that covers and protects

title: skydd


text:
skyddsängel

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) a guardian angel

title: skyddsängel


text:
smuthound

Noun

 * 1)  A purveyor or seeker of erotica.

title: smuthound


text: smuthounds

title: smuthounds


text:
skyddsglasögon

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) goggles; protective glasses

title: skyddsglasögon


text:
djurskyddslag

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) animal protection law

title: djurskyddslag


text:
User talk:Lakid

Your recent edit has been undone. Please use the sandbox for any further tests you wish to make. To learn more about editing Wiktionary please read Help:How to edit a page or nose around in the community portal. Thank you. — msh210 ℠ 00:29, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

title: User talk:Lakid


text:
جوهر

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) jewel(s)
 * 2) precious stone(s)
 * 3) pearl(s)
 * 4) gem(s), gemstone(s)
 * 5) any stone from which one may extract a profit
 * 6) precious ore
 * 7) veins of marble
 * 1) veins of marble

Noun

 * 1) essence inherent nature, substance, matter, nature
 * 2) soul
 * 3) marrow
 * 4) worth, excellence

Etymology
, from, from.

Noun

 * 1) jewel, any valuable object used for personal ornamentation
 * 2) gem, gemstone, any precious or semi-precious stone
 * 3) ore, rock or other material that contains valuable materials
 * 4) damascening, the process of making a sword damascene
 * 1) ore, rock or other material that contains valuable materials
 * 2) damascening, the process of making a sword damascene
 * 1) damascening, the process of making a sword damascene

Etymology
, itself from Early, from.

Noun

 * 1)  jewel
 * 2)  gem
 * 3)  pearl

Noun

 * 1)  essence, substance
 * 2) ink
 * 3) dye
 * 4) acid

title: جوهر


text:
handgranat

Noun

 * 1) a hand grenade

Usage notes
See the usage notes for.

title: handgranat


text:
skatelike

Adjective

 * 1) Resembling or characteristic of a skate (the fish).

title: skatelike


text:
magazinelike

Adjective

 * 1) Resembling or characteristic of a magazine (publication).

title: magazinelike


text:
pristineness

Noun

 * 1) The state or condition of being pristine.

title: pristineness


text:
bezopasan

Etymology
From. .

Adjective

 * 1) harmless

title: bezopasan


text:
безопасан

Adjective

 * 1) harmless

title: безопасан


text:
anna olla

Phrase

 * 1)  let it be
 * 2) forget it
 * 1) forget it

title: anna olla


text:
lutati

Verb

 * 1)  to wander, roam

title: lutati


text:
лутати

Verb

 * 1)  to wander, roam

title: лутати


text:
zalutati

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to get lost, go astray

title: zalutati


text:
залутати

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to get lost, go astray

title: залутати


text:
луталица

Noun

 * 1) wanderer
 * 2) stray animal, stray

title: луталица


text:
kliŝo

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) cliché

title: kliŝo


text: kliŝoj

title: kliŝoj


text: kliŝon

title: kliŝon


text:
skitati

Etymology
.

Verb

 * 1)  to wander around, roam

title: skitati


text:
скитати

Etymology
.

Verb

 * 1)  to wander around, roam

title: скитати


text: kliŝojn

title: kliŝojn


text:
nonzonal

Adjective

 * 1) Not zonal.

Translations

 * Polish: astrefowy

title: nonzonal


text:
skitnica

Noun

 * 1) wanderer
 * 2) tramp

title: skitnica


text:
скитница

Noun

 * 1) wanderer
 * 2) tramp

title: скитница


text:
nonimmunized

Adjective

 * 1) Not having been immunized.

title: nonimmunized


text:
nonantique

Adjective

 * 1) Not antique.

Noun

 * 1) An item that is not an antique.

title: nonantique


text: nonantiques

title: nonantiques


text:
storelike

Adjective

 * 1) Resembling or characteristic of a store; shoplike.

title: storelike


text:
Talk:modal scale

modal scale
Tagged but not listed. --Connel MacKenzie 21:13, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

If anyone is upset by me listing these 113 previously tagged, but unlisted entries, I'll be happy to move them as a list to my userpage-space, and continue adding them here only intermittently. --Connel MacKenzie 21:13, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

 * Cleaned up --Volants 16:59, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

RFC discussion: June 2007–November 2009
Tagged but not listed. --Connel MacKenzie 21:13, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

If anyone is upset by me listing these 113 previously tagged, but unlisted entries, I'll be happy to move them as a list to my userpage-space, and continue adding them here only intermittently. --Connel MacKenzie 21:13, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

 * Cleaned up --Volants 16:59, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:modal scale


text: smutches

title: smutches


text: smutching

title: smutching


text: smutched

title: smutched


text:
satumainen

Adjective

 * 1) fabulous

title: satumainen


text:
Appendix talk:Urdu Muslim given names

Source: Copied from multiple Transwiki pages. I've copied over the source history of letterA on the main talk page. Y on talk page # Appendix talk:Urdu Muslim given names/2 and so forth today. Goldenrowley 01:04, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Muslim
Is there some reason to exclude non-Muslim names? Mglovesfun (talk) 22:59, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

title: Appendix talk:Urdu Muslim given names


text:
loppmarknad

Etymology
. Cf. 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) flea market

title: loppmarknad


text:
tarumainen

Adjective

 * 1) legendary
 * 2) fabulous of the nature of a fable; unhistorical

title: tarumainen


text: User:Amalthea

title: User:Amalthea


text:
Talk:sap

sap
The indentation levels are incorrect and sort out which meanings belong to which etymology. Also clean up cites (dates and markup). H. (talk) 10:40, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

 * Cleaned up structure, but not cites. DCDuring TALK 11:35, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

 * Good now --Volants 16:59, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

RFC discussion: June 2007–November 2009
The indentation levels are incorrect and sort out which meanings belong to which etymology. Also clean up cites (dates and markup). H. (talk) 10:40, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

 * Cleaned up structure, but not cites. DCDuring TALK 11:35, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

 * Good now --Volants 16:59, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:sap


text:
Talk:idea

Pronunciation
I've heard the word pronounced "ideer". Where is it pronounced like that? Eric Kvaalen 11:45, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

In Rhode Island. I am a Rhode Islander who does not pronounce it as such, so I know.

I came to this page for this reason, I've just heard an Englishman from London say it. For some reason, Dutch 'educated' people pronounce it like that as well when trying to sound as if they don't have an accent. 81.68.255.36 20:39, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

 * For a Londoner this wouldn't be an unusual pronunciation. It's simply intrusive R, which is pretty standard in British English. Londoners also say: "lawr and order". The peculiar thing is when you hear it pronounced "idear" by Americans.

 * It's not "intrusive R" unless the word is follow'd by a word that starts with a vowel. I don't know about Londoners, but Rhode Islanders for example put the R in regardless of whether the next word starts with a vowel. Eric Kvaalen (talk) 07:53, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

 * Well, yes. That's what I said. In southern British English, is only ever pronounced before a vowel. So "idea" is, and with intrusive R it can become . The point is that there's nothing special about the word "idea" in these non-rhotic dialects; it simply behaves like any word in  (which is usually ‹-eer›, ‹-ear›, ‹-ere›). And then I repeat my last sentence: "The peculiar thing is when you hear it pronounced "idear" by Americans." Because in these dialects it's really an  that's been added to the word.

RFC discussion: June 2007–November 2009
The derived terms section includes terms derived from terms in the list (eg, "ideally" from "ideal") which should be moved out of this table; further, not all terms are derived from "idea": those beginning "ideo-" are certainly not; these may well be related, however.

Note that this table was mistitled "Related terms", so probably lumped all derived and related terms together. — Paul G 14:33, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

 * Has been fixed --Volants 16:59, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Philosophical senses from Chambers 1908

 * An archetype of the manifold varieties of existence in the universe, belonging to the supersensible world, where reality is found and where God is (Platonic).
 * One of the three products of the reason (the Soul, the Universe, and God) transcending the conceptions of the understanding transcendental ideas, in the functions of mind concerned with the unification of existence (Kantian).
 * The ideal realised, the absolute truth of which everything that exists is the expression (Hegelian).

Equinox ◑ 18:13, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

interjection
Isn't "the idea!" an interjection? --Backinstadiums (talk) 00:21, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

 * Occurs in many forms, e.g. "the very idea of it!". Also other nouns e.g. "the cheek!" (rudeness). I would not consider idea an intj. Equinox ◑ 00:24, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

 * what meaning does "the idea!" conveys? --Backinstadiums (talk) 00:37, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

 * If I exclaim "the X!" then I am saying that the X (whatever it is) is something unacceptable, probably taking liberties, very rude and cheeky. Suppose I just met you tonight and you ask to sleep over at my house. My wife says "the idea!". She means: it's very rude for you to ask that, and even the idea, the thought of doing it, is very rude and unacceptable. Equinox ◑ 02:25, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

get ideas
get (any) ideas To have thoughts or schemes about taking advantage of a particular person or situation. Often used in a negative imperative. https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/getting+ideas --Backinstadiums (talk) 21:05, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Sometimes implicitly good?
"That's an idea!" "It might be an idea to..." These phrases are not used when the idea is bad or unworkable. Equinox ◑ 19:21, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

title: Talk:idea


text:
User talk:Xczwe

Conrad.Irwin 01:11, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

title: User talk:Xczwe


text:
Talk:amir

amir
The language of the definition seems a little old-fashioned, and the definition doesn't correspond with emir (which lists amir) as an alternative spelling). Pistachio 08:53, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

 * Improved. —Stephen 14:23, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

 * Thanks. *-* Pistachio 17:28, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

title: Talk:amir


text:
Talk:allumé

allumé
Is this French slang for drunk/stoned (lit?) --Connel MacKenzie 10:36, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

 * As far as I know, it’s an Anglicism. I’ve never heard allumé used to mean drunk or stoned before. —Stephen 17:02, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

 * I've never heard it, either; I think it might be heavily dated slang. The digitized Trésor de la Langue Française (TLFi) includes as a sub-sub-sub-sub-sense (sub-sense of the figurative sub-sense of the light-related  sub-sense of the adjective sub-sense):

 * Arg. [Slang], pop. [native] ,,Échauffé par le vin.`` ["Heated by wine"] ( LARCH. 1880 [i.e., the def was taken from an 1880 source])

 * and gives a cite from 1887.

 * http://atilf.atilf.fr/dendien/scripts/fast.exe?mot=allum%E9

 * —RuakhTALK 19:34, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

RFC discussion: June 2007
Is this French slang for drunk/stoned (lit?) --Connel MacKenzie 10:36, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

 * As far as I know, it’s an Anglicism. I’ve never heard allumé used to mean drunk or stoned before. —Stephen 17:02, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

 * I've never heard it, either; I think it might be heavily dated slang. The digitized Trésor de la Langue Française (TLFi) includes as a sub-sub-sub-sub-sense (sub-sense of the figurative sub-sense of the light-related sub-sense of the adjective sub-sense):

 * Arg. [Slang], pop. [native] ,,Échauffé par le vin.`` ["Heated by wine"] ( LARCH. 1880 [i.e., the def was taken from an 1880 source])

 * and gives a cite from 1887.

 * http://atilf.atilf.fr/dendien/scripts/fast.exe?mot=allum%E9

 * —RuakhTALK 19:34, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

title: Talk:allumé


text:
neizbježan

Adjective

 * 1) inevitable, unavoidable

title: neizbježan


text:
неизбјежан

Adjective

 * 1) inevitable, unavoidable

title: неизбјежан


text:
neizbežan

Adjective

 * 1) inevitable, unavoidable

title: neizbežan


text:
неизбежан

Adjective

 * 1) inevitable, unavoidable

title: неизбежан


text:
неизбјежно

Adverb

 * 1) unavoidably, inevitably

title: неизбјежно


text:
neizbežno

Adverb

 * 1) unavoidably, inevitably

title: neizbežno


text:
неизбежно

Adverb

 * 1) inevitably

Adverb

 * 1) inevitably

Adverb

 * 1) inevitably

Predicative

 * 1) it is inevitable

Adverb

 * 1) unavoidably, inevitably

title: неизбежно


text: nuotit

title: nuotit


text:
Talk:mitigation

mitigation
The definition is in term of verbs, while the word is a noun. Wikipedia gives something else to interpret. H. (talk) 10:41, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Countable?
Is mitigation countable? I've seen contradicting opinions on this. I.e. is it possible to say "a mitigation"?

 * Yes, e.g. "On 29 November 1993 the Korneuburg Regional Court dismissed the applicant's request for a mitigation of his sentence." Equinox ◑ 13:02, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

title: Talk:mitigation


text:
Talk:serjeanty

serjeanty
Is this a noun? --Connel MacKenzie 18:46, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
 * From the example sentence I'd have said it was an adjective, but The Chambers Dictionary (1998) has it as a noun. Thryduulf 20:09, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

title: Talk:serjeanty


text:
Talk:poedel

poedel
The etymology for this Dutch word seems to be for another Dutch word, or am I mistaken? --EncycloPetey 06:23, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

 * It should be under Derived terms rather than Etymology. —Stephen 14:21, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
 * OK, that makes sense. I think the User who created this entry is regularly confusing Etymology with Derived terms.  Thanks for figuring this out. --EncycloPetey 18:09, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

title: Talk:poedel


text:
Talk:blockquote

blockquote
The Portuguese translation translates the definition, not the headword. It needs to be replaced with a proper definition or, if none exists, trimmed into a brief gloss (the current one is far too wordy). — Paul G 13:56, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

 * Was removed --Volants 13:57, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

This entry ranks near 550 on the "page ranks". That high ranking must be an artifact of the partiicular corpus selected. It should have been a stopword, I think. It makes the page ranks generally look suspect. Do they need review and updating? DCDuring TALK 19:40, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

 * The rank thing is not there now --Volants 15:25, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

RFC discussion: August 2007–November 2009
The Portuguese translation translates the definition, not the headword. It needs to be replaced with a proper definition or, if none exists, trimmed into a brief gloss (the current one is far too wordy). — Paul G 13:56, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

 * Was removed --Volants 13:57, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:blockquote


text: writ larger

title: writ larger


text: writ largest

title: writ largest


text:
Talk:double negative

litotes
These two entries need cleaning up in conjunction with each other. They each imply that a double negation to imply a weak positive (e.g. "not bad" meaning "alright", "so so"; "not unhappy" meaning neither particularly happy nor unhappy) is the other. Thryduulf 15:26, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

 * I don't know whether this has been changed yet, but based on the current definitions, I disagree:
 * Firstly, neither of them necessarily mean a "weak positive"; Double Negatives can just be considered bad english, and Litotes quite often imply a strong positive.
 * Secondly, the overall opinion of the two differ widely; Litotes are used deliberately, and intended for emphasis, whereas Double Negatives are generally frowned upon, and considered a mistake.
 * P.S. This is my first comment; I hope I'm not out of place! Dave
 * We may disagree, but they are not out of place.
 * An entry is not supposed to be written as if we were a grammar, usage, or style guide. We have a "lexical" focus, about words as words. We usually hint at such matters, perhaps illustrating the phenomenon with examples, as we would other entries with a photo or drawing, and pass the user on to Wikipedia or an Appendix. DCDuring TALK 14:50, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * An entry is not supposed to be written as if we were a grammar, usage, or style guide. We have a "lexical" focus, about words as words. We usually hint at such matters, perhaps illustrating the phenomenon with examples, as we would other entries with a photo or drawing, and pass the user on to Wikipedia or an Appendix. DCDuring TALK 14:50, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

 * Also, the "usage notes" don't really belong there, because they aren't describing how to use the phrase double negative. Equinox ◑ 13:53, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I have reworded the first sentence at double negative to make it more like a real usage note, while still hinting at the "correctness" matter. The other material is commented out or moved to an Examples box. Is the Examples box useful? DCDuring TALK 14:50, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I have moved the examples at litotes to an Examples box and added a double negative example.
 * Many linguistic and rhetorical entries exhibit inappropriate modality. The location that should be for usage examples of the word is instead used for illustrations of the phenomenon. Ruakh's recent provides a format for such things that eliminates, I think, the modal confusion. Many similar linguistic and rhetorical entries need to be appropriately modified. DCDuring TALK 15:39, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

 * Looks better --Volants 13:57, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Anecdote
Oxford philosopher of language J. L. Austin gave a lecture once in which he noted that there are many languages in which a double negative makes a positive. He also remarked that there were none in which a double positive makes a negative. Columbian philosopher Sidney Morgenbesser was sitting in the audience. Upon hearing this statement, he muttered, “Yeah, right.”

litotes
These two entries need cleaning up in conjunction with each other. They each imply that a double negation to imply a weak positive (e.g. "not bad" meaning "alright", "so so"; "not unhappy" meaning neither particularly happy nor unhappy) is the other. Thryduulf 15:26, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

 * I don't know whether this has been changed yet, but based on the current definitions, I disagree:
 * Firstly, neither of them necessarily mean a "weak positive"; Double Negatives can just be considered bad english, and Litotes quite often imply a strong positive.
 * Secondly, the overall opinion of the two differ widely; Litotes are used deliberately, and intended for emphasis, whereas Double Negatives are generally frowned upon, and considered a mistake.
 * P.S. This is my first comment; I hope I'm not out of place! Dave
 * We may disagree, but they are not out of place.
 * An entry is not supposed to be written as if we were a grammar, usage, or style guide. We have a "lexical" focus, about words as words. We usually hint at such matters, perhaps illustrating the phenomenon with examples, as we would other entries with a photo or drawing, and pass the user on to Wikipedia or an Appendix. DCDuring TALK 14:50, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * An entry is not supposed to be written as if we were a grammar, usage, or style guide. We have a "lexical" focus, about words as words. We usually hint at such matters, perhaps illustrating the phenomenon with examples, as we would other entries with a photo or drawing, and pass the user on to Wikipedia or an Appendix. DCDuring TALK 14:50, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

 * Also, the "usage notes" don't really belong there, because they aren't describing how to use the phrase double negative. Equinox ◑ 13:53, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I have reworded the first sentence at double negative to make it more like a real usage note, while still hinting at the "correctness" matter. The other material is commented out or moved to an Examples box. Is the Examples box useful? DCDuring TALK 14:50, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I have moved the examples at litotes to an Examples box and added a double negative example.
 * Many linguistic and rhetorical entries exhibit inappropriate modality. The location that should be for usage examples of the word is instead used for illustrations of the phenomenon. Ruakh's recent provides a format for such things that eliminates, I think, the modal confusion. Many similar linguistic and rhetorical entries need to be appropriately modified. DCDuring TALK 15:39, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

 * Looks better --Volants 13:57, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

He nevere yet no vilaynie ne sayde
Current English translation please? --Backinstadiums (talk) 17:39, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:double negative


text:
korvakuulo

Noun

 * 1) ear in the sense of ability to hear something, especially music and language, and discern whether it sounds the same as heard before
 * 2)  hearing, hearing of the ear
 * 1)  hearing, hearing of the ear
 * 1)  hearing, hearing of the ear
 * 1)  hearing, hearing of the ear

title: korvakuulo


text:
Talk:litotes

RFC discussion
See talk:double negative.

RFC discussion: August 2007–November 2009

 * See Talk:double negative.

title: Talk:litotes


text:
Talk:absent

absent
Quotes need dates etc. One definition is a bit strange, native speaker needed. H. (talk) 09:28, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

 * I agree about that definition, I've marked it for RFV. Thryduulf 11:28, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

 * Has been rectified/moved to another cleanup page --Volants 13:57, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

RFV discussion
See Requests for verification archive/August 2007.

RFC discussion: August 2007–November 2009
Quotes need dates etc. One definition is a bit strange, native speaker needed. H. (talk) 09:28, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

 * I agree about that definition, I've marked it for RFV. Thryduulf 11:28, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

 * Has been rectified/moved to another cleanup page --Volants 13:57, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:absent


text:
Talk:mopy

mopy
I nedd help with formatting. I'm not sure how to set up etymology for the verb form. And the noun is a problem: the noun is actually mopy fish, which should actually have the odd capitalization MOPy fish, but I can see people trying to look up mopy if they saw the term mopy fish somewhere. (Sorry about the mess). RJFJR 13:34, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

 * Cleaned up by others --Volants 13:57, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

RFC discussion: August 2007–November 2009
I nedd help with formatting. I'm not sure how to set up etymology for the verb form. And the noun is a problem: the noun is actually mopy fish, which should actually have the odd capitalization MOPy fish, but I can see people trying to look up mopy if they saw the term mopy fish somewhere. (Sorry about the mess). RJFJR 13:34, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

 * Cleaned up by others --Volants 13:57, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

RFV discussion: October–November 2019
Ety 3: "To move a file to a target location without caring whether or not the source file is deleted afterwards." I feel as though I would have heard of this. Be careful not to confuse with the document-printing sense (ety 2) which also occurs in computer contexts. Equinox ◑ 11:52, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

 * Regardless of whether this can be verified, the definition is rather unclear. In Unix-speak, to move a file means to rename it (without making a copy). So then there is only one file (whose name got changed), and it is unclear what is meant by “the source file”. (It does not help reduce the confusion that in computing “source file” usually means a file containing source code, like seen here.) If the meaning of mopy – without paying attention to the concerns of the mopier – is to make a copy of a file to a second location so that there are now two copies, one in the source location and one in the target location, it is unclear what is meant by care. Is the lack of care a sign of carelessness? Or was the whole point of the copying to safeguard the content of the file, knowing that files at the source location may be deleted, for example because it is an area reserved for temporary storage? Why does a simple move not suffice? --Lambiam 12:25, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
 * I don't recall any time when someone made a distinction between moving a file between directories and moving a file between filesystems in my time with Linux. The fact that it is internally renamed is an implementation detail. It doesn't seem all that unclear; a mopy would be a rename if possible, and a copy if the user didn't have the right to delete the original or possibly across filesystems.
 * As for verification, there's a couple MS-DOS books that apparently use the word "mopy" but I can't see enough to get a sense of what it means. Otherwise, I can't see anything, even cites from the raw web.--Prosfilaes (talk) 18:41, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
 * In a Linux command like  the file is “moved” within the same directory. It is quite unlike the   instruction of many assemblers. The occurrences in MS-DOS power user's guide Vol. 1 and DOS 5 simplified are scannos for “Copy”.  --Lambiam 22:27, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

RFV-failed Kiwima (talk) 20:18, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

title: Talk:mopy


text:
Talk:𨳒

𨳒
vi? --Connel MacKenzie 08:28, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

 * Vietnam, like other countries in China's sphere of influence, used to use Classical Chinese for a lot of writing, and also to use Chinese characters for native writing. "Han tu" are characters that weren't used for native writing, but we probably still want to include them because different countries pronounced these characters differently, so Classical Chinese words have Vietnamese pronunciations, Japanese pronunciations, and so on. (These fall into a larger umbrella called "readings", and it can be quite complicated; in modern Japanese the same "kanji" — Chinese character for Japanese — will often have a "Chinese reading" and a "Japanese reading", with some expressions using the one and some using the other.) In the case of "han tu" I'm not sure if it makes more sense to list the character as Vietnamese, though, or to give its Vietnamese reading somewhere in one of the other language sections. —Ruakh TALK 15:48, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

 * Seems to have been cleaned up --Volants 14:20, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

RFC discussion: September 2007–November 2009
vi? --Connel MacKenzie 08:28, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

 * Vietnam, like other countries in China's sphere of influence, used to use Classical Chinese for a lot of writing, and also to use Chinese characters for native writing. "Han tu" are characters that weren't used for native writing, but we probably still want to include them because different countries pronounced these characters differently, so Classical Chinese words have Vietnamese pronunciations, Japanese pronunciations, and so on. (These fall into a larger umbrella called "readings", and it can be quite complicated; in modern Japanese the same "kanji" — Chinese character for Japanese — will often have a "Chinese reading" and a "Japanese reading", with some expressions using the one and some using the other.) In the case of "han tu" I'm not sure if it makes more sense to list the character as Vietnamese, though, or to give its Vietnamese reading somewhere in one of the other language sections. —Ruakh TALK 15:48, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

 * Seems to have been cleaned up --Volants 14:20, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:𨳒


text:
Talk:kang-mi

kang-mi
This does appear to be a valid Sherpa word... It appears, however, that the Sherpa language can be written either in Tibetan or Devanagari script, not in Roman. Can someone more clueful than I please move this entry to its proper spelling in one of those scripts? -- Visviva 15:44, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

 * I don’t have a source for Sherpa. Apparently "kangmi" means snowman. Typing it phonetically, it would be (kang-mi) or possibly  (khang-mi). —Stephen 17:15, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

RFC discussion: September 2007–November 2009
This does appear to be a valid Sherpa word... It appears, however, that the Sherpa language can be written either in Tibetan or Devanagari script, not in Roman. Can someone more clueful than I please move this entry to its proper spelling in one of those scripts? -- Visviva 15:44, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

 * I don’t have a source for Sherpa. Apparently "kangmi" means snowman. Typing it phonetically, it would be (kang-mi) or possibly  (khang-mi). —Stephen 17:15, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

 * Now up for deletion --Volants 12:59, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:kang-mi


text:
Talk:LOCATOR

locator
If “LOCATOR” meets WT:CFI, it belongs at “LOCATOR”. Does it meet WT:CFI? Rod (A. Smith) 06:38, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

title: Talk:LOCATOR


text:
Talk:kop

kop
This is either spelled wrong or not Yiddish: Yiddish does not use the Latin alphabet.—msh210 ℠ 18:06, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

 * Yiddish was removed --Volants 14:20, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Dutch
What about the "(kranten)kop", like a "headline", should that be added to the Dutch nouns as well?

RFC discussion: September 2007–November 2009
This is either spelled wrong or not Yiddish: Yiddish does not use the Latin alphabet.—msh210 ℠ 18:06, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

 * Yiddish was removed --Volants 14:20, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:kop


text:
Talk:feld

feld
This is either spelled wrong or not Yiddish: Yiddish does not use the Latin alphabet.—msh210 ℠ 18:06, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

 * Removed --Volants 14:20, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

RFC discussion: September 2007–November 2009
This is either spelled wrong or not Yiddish: Yiddish does not use the Latin alphabet.—msh210 ℠ 18:06, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

 * Removed --Volants 14:20, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

RFV discussion: March–April 2021
Doesn't seem to be attested in ModE either. Hazarasp (parlement · werkis) 03:24, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

RFV-failed Kiwima (talk) 04:48, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:feld


text:
Talk:comunista

comunista
--Connel MacKenzie 21:17, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

 * To clarify: is this about the presence of multiple "noun" sections in the same parent section? —Ruakh TALK 21:34, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

 * Yes. --Connel MacKenzie 22:23, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

 * So, what would you prefer? —Ruakh TALK 17:49, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

 * Yes, what would you prefer? Such structure seems to be the only way to achieve a goal that I thought you (Connel) supported: moving grammar details from definition lines into headword/inflection lines.  Rod (A. Smith) 18:33, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

title: Talk:comunista


text:
aktorino

Noun

 * 1) actress (female actor)

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  actress

title: aktorino


text: aktorinoj

title: aktorinoj


text: aktorinon

title: aktorinon


text: aktorinojn

title: aktorinojn


text: Nietzscheans

title: Nietzscheans


text: 老挝

title: 老挝


text: hyænæ

title: hyænæ


text: takes stock

title: takes stock


text: taking stock

title: taking stock


text: taken stock

title: taken stock


text: took stock

title: took stock


text:
ei voi olla totta

Phrase

 * 1) no way indicates astonished disbelief or rejection.

title: ei voi olla totta


text:
sklerotizovaný

Adjective

 * 1) hardened, tough, hard

title: sklerotizovaný


text:
krytka

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) cover

title: krytka


text:
ei käy

Phrase

 * 1) no way absolutely not; under no circumstances.

title: ei käy


text:
kuin kuumille kiville

Etymology
Literally: "like on hot stones"; a reference to sauna bath where the water evaporates quickly from hot stones.

Phrase

 * 1)  like hot cakes quickly, especially by purchase or consumption

Usage notes
Most often used with, with the meaning "to sell like hot cakes".

title: kuin kuumille kiville


text:
User:DionysiusThrax

Welcome to my stubby little user page (and No, I am ~not~ a stubby little user)! DionysiusThrax 04:53, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

title: User:DionysiusThrax


text:
คายัค

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) (เรือ~) kayak.

title: คายัค


text: กำมะหยี

title: กำมะหยี


text:
เซลเซียส

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) (องศา~) Celsius.

title: เซลเซียส


text:
นมเปรี้ยว

Etymology
From 🇰🇲; literally "sour milk".

Noun

 * 1) yogurt.

title: นมเปรี้ยว


text:
เปรี้ยว

Adjective

 * 1) fermented; sour; acidic; tart; sharp (of taste).
 * 2) bold; daring; flashy; avant-garde.
 * 3) loud (said of fashion).
 * 4)  reckless; sexy (of a person’s behavior, especially a young woman).
 * 5) modern; chic; stylish (of a person’s behavior, especially a young woman).
 * 6) forward; flirtatious; coquettish (of a person’s behavior, especially a young woman).

title: เปรี้ยว


text:
โยเกิร์ต

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) yogurt.

title: โยเกิร์ต


text:
จวัก

Etymology
From,. Compare 🇨🇬; Modern 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) ladle, especially one made of coconut shell.
 * 2) * 2000,, ประชุมโคลงโลกนิติ, สถาบันภาษาไทย กรมวิชาการ กระทรวงศึกษาธิการ, ISBN 9742688192, page 76:

Synonyms

 * See synonyms at

title: จวัก


text:
กุล

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) tribe, race, lineage.
 * 2) troupe, team, company, pack, family, bevy, group, caste.
 * 3) bullet wood tree

title: กุล


text:
ข่าง

Etymology 1
From. Cognate with 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬 (as in ) or (as in ), 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) (ลูก~) spinning top

Noun

 * 1) a type of seaside plant

title: ข่าง