text:
Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2009-08/Common placenames get entries

Idiomaticity
About examples: I agree with Corello Street, and River Thames, but certainly not with New York or Stratford-on-Avon. The only link between New York and York is etymological... Lmaltier 13:40, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Can you explain your reasoning for Stratford-on-Avon? —  msh210  ℠  21:03, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Statford is a part of the word Stratford-on-Avon. The complete word is Stratford-on-Avon. Lmaltier 05:56, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * In the placename Stratford-on-Avon, yes, Stratford is a part. But Stratford is a word on its own, and (barring inclusion of Stratford-on-Avon on other grounds, that is, assuming we're only talking about inclusion under due to this vote) Stratford-on-Avon is for purposes of etymology and pronunciation and rhymes and cognates and spellings and cetera pretty much the sum of its parts. (And where it's not, that can be explained in a usage note for the appropriate component.) And that's what these "common name of town" entries are good for. —  msh210  ℠  12:28, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

I don't understand this at all. How can a proper name be idiomatic or not? It doesn't have meaning; it denotes a specific place. You either know where various Yorks and New Yorks are, or you don't. (You may be able to infer something about the name's etymology, but that's not understanding its meaning.) New York doesn't mean “the newer York!” —Michael Z. 2009-08-07 04:44 z

(I guess in a sense proper names are all idiomatic, since each refers to a specific referent. But this doesn't help us.) —Michael Z. 2009-08-07 05:14 z

Definitions
Definitions such as A common name for rivers. ou A common name for villages in England. have already been proposed on fr.wikt, but they don't work:
 * different places = different senses. People living in Paris (Texas) don't feel that they live in France. The senses are different.
 * translations may be different: the Portuguese name for Rome (Italy) is Roma, but it's Rome for Rome (Illinois).
 * other linguistic information such as pronunciation or demonyms may be different (cf. fr:Beaulieu).

Yes, pages could look like Wikipedia disambiguation pages. So what? It's already the case for common nouns, and it's quite normal, because of the Wiktionary principle: all words written the same way are grouped into a common page (which is the principle of Wikipedia disambiguation pages).

Conclusion: it's better to stick to principles: two senses = two definition lines. Lmaltier 13:56, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, two senses = two definition lines. And Rome (NY) is a different referent of Rome than Rome (It.) is. And the BP is discussing, and has many times discussed, which places we want as senses. But this vote is about a different kind of meaning altogether. —  msh210  ℠  21:03, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

 * Referents are not senses. We don't list every Fido, Rex, and Fifi under dog.  If there is a dozen Parises named after the French city, then that is one definition.  If some of them are named after the Greek hero, then the etymology can make note of that, or be split into a separate heading.  If certain ones have significant lexical differences, then additional senses may be warranted.

 * Encyclopedias are about things, so it's Wikipedia's job to list every instance of a notable person, place or thing Paris. Dictionaries are about words, so it's arguably our job to define every attested word or name “Paris”. —Michael Z. 2009-08-07 04:53 z

 * I consider that dog names should not be considered as words at all (or only as "invented" words): if a dog is called Fidorexfifi, this name should not be included. The only reason to include Fido is that it's a common name for dogs, it's now a word of the language meaning "common dog name" (single sense). But toponyms are words, with one or several senses. It's like common nouns: if a word can mean a bird or a snake, these senses are different senses, and warrant separate definitions and translations (name given to various animal species is not a sufficient definition). It's the same for towns: they may have different translations, different demonyms, etc. Sharing the same etymology is not sharing the same sense. Lmaltier 05:28, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

 * I'm not sure I expressed myself clearly.

 * Fido is a common name for dogs. Laurence is a common name for men.  Saint Paul is a common name for settlements.  This proposal seeks to add a rule that we add the third on exactly the same pattern as the first two.

 * But what I meant above is that while we define these words, we don't define the things that they represent (their referents). We don't define Fido, the poodle cross that's walked past my back window, we don't define Laurence Olivier, the famous actor, and we don't (or oughtn't, according to our CFI) define St. Paul, Minnesota.   The US city is not a “sense” of St. Paul—it is a US city—any more than Sir Laurence is a “sense” of Laurence. If you think we should add definitions for specific people and places—encyclopedic entries—then go ahead and propose it, but I think that would be a significantly different proposal from this one. —Michael Z. 2009-08-08 03:43 z

 * On purist grounds, I agree with you, but then, consider an entry like [[Jacksonesque]]. Because it's an adjective, it doesn't have "referents" per se, but the inherent "Jackson" does refer to various Messrs. (and perhaps Mmes.) Jackson. The second and third senses are not strictly necessary, but I think they're valid. When a single sense (referent, in this case) dominates, it seems potentially worth mentioning, even if that means we tread on Wikipedia's toes. :-/  —Ruakh TALK 04:04, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

 * No, that's not what I'm objecting to. All three entries in your example are allowed by the attributive-use guideline (assuming they're sufficiently attested). Adjectives like Londonesque or whatever are allowed, even common attributive uses like New York, as used in New York deli, New York bookie, New York beat cop, etc. It can be okay if the etymology or the meaning of a word refers to a specific thing.

 * I'm objecting to specific entities being considered "senses", as if the word was the thing. Like St Paul defined as “the city in Minnesota.”  The current CFI does not allow this definition, nor does it allow Andrew Jackson, Michael Jackson, nor Jackson (3: Andrew Jackson).  A specific thing is not a sense of a word, does not qualify to be defined as such, by our current CFI nor would it be if this proposal were accepted.  It is not okay if a definition is a specific thing.

 * A definition defines a word. A thing is a thing.  A thing can be mentioned in a definition, but it is not a definition. —Michael Z. 2009-08-08 04:51 z

 * I'm not sure. To be sure, there is a difference between a noun and its referent, but not all nouns designate actual classes. There is a kind of animal called a "dog"; there is not a kind of person called "John", nor a kind of place called "New York". Each individual person named John, and each individual place named New York, is a separate sense of that name, and there's no way to know of that sense without actually knowing of it. (Admittedly, there is also a common noun John, as in "Man, there are a lot of Johns at this school", with one sense: "A person whose name is John". But you become a common-noun John by being one sense of the proper-noun, not vice versa.)
 * Obviously we're not going to include a separate sense for every person named John, both because that's impossible, and because it's not useful. But that doesn't mean there isn't a separate sense — only that we don't include it (and don't want to).
 * (Personally, I don't think we want to include a separate sense for every place with a given place-name, either. It's just that I think they are separate senses, and we can decide whether or not we treat them as such.)
 * —Ruakh TALK 14:51, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

 * You're still mixing up lexical words with encyclopedic things, classes, states, attributes. Dogs, and dogs named Fido, and guys named John, and tired dogs, and frustrating dogs, and towns named Stafford are things, while dog, Fido, John, tiredness, frustrating, and Stafford are words.  Words have senses, but things are not senses.  Many words are used to describe things, but the way they are applied varies (proper nouns happen to differ substantially this way, and Rockports happen to be more rare than Roberts).  Still, every man John, or city Halifax, or pen on my desk, or every single time I get tired, and every sheep in the field are not different words, senses, or definienda; they are different things, instances, referents. —Michael Z. 2009-08-08 15:55 z

 * Since neither of us seems to have evidence for our respective claims — at least, I don't have any, and you haven't presented any — I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree. —Ruakh TALK 16:08, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

 * Huh? In what I've described, what exactly is a claim without evidence?

 * Let me simplify it for you: Robert Borden is a proper name, so our CFI don't warrant its inclusion. Robert is not a proper name, but a common name applied to many people, and one CFI explicitly welcomes it.   Just like Cher which we define as a name, rather than identifying it with (“defining” it as) a famous person. (I don't think I'm making any spurious claims here.)

 * This proposal is suggesting that we should treat place names exactly the same way. That's all. —Michael Z. 2009-08-08 16:28 z

 * First of all, "Robert" is a proper name. Second of all, the CFI do not determine what a "sense" is; they determine which senses we include. One sense of is in reference to me. As the CFI (and common sense) make quite clear, we don't want that sense. But that doesn't mean it isn't one. You are making the claim that it isn't a sense, but you've provided no evidence for it, and I reject it. (I'm not providing evidence, either: I'm stating my opinion, you're stating yours. Hence my statement that this argument isn't going to go anywhere useful.) You point out (rightly) that there's not a separate sense of "dog" for each dog; and likewise, there's not a separate sense of the common noun "Ran" for each person named Ran; rather, there's a single common noun sense "Ran" meaning "A person named Ran", and a myriad proper noun senses "Ran", one for each person with that name. —Ruakh TALK 16:47, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

 * Well I think that's exactly what I'm saying, that this proposal is to include the common-noun sense of any placename, just as we already include the common-noun sense of a personal name.

 * As far as I can tell, you and I just don't agree on the meaning of sense as it relates to proper names. Whether it refers to me or to the actor Mr. Caine, whether addressing a person or referring to them, I see the use of Michael in a proper name to be one sense of the word, just as the same sense of pen refers to both the blue and red ones on my desk.  You might disagree on the definition of sense, but I think once we start talking about specific referents, then we have left the lexicographical realm and entered the encyclopedic.

 * I wonder if the distinctions “proper noun” and “proper name” are of any real use in lexicography. Why do we use it, when OED, COD, NOAD, RH, AHD, and M–W don't?  Do any important dictionaries use it?

 * First of all, no, we include only a generic sort of proper-noun sense of a personal name, because once you know that, the common-noun sense is just obvious (assuming you speak English).
 * Re: "As far as I can tell, you and I just don't agree on the meaning of sense as it relates to proper names": Exactly. That's what I've been saying. :-)
 * Our disagreement is not entirely academic; you dismiss out-of-hand the notion that we should define place-names in terms of the places they name, whereas I am open to that possibility, if a decent proposal is made. (We both reject the notion of including a "Michael Caine" sense for, but for different reasons: you reject it because you don't think that's a distinct sense, I reject it because it's not useful or possible. Your reason applies equally to place-names; my reason may or may not apply to place-names, depending on the proposal.)
 * The distinction between "common noun" and "proper noun" is absolutely useful. If no other dictionaries use it, then all the better for us. :-D
 * —Ruakh TALK 20:36, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

 * I don't reject specific (encyclopedic) type entries for place names, but I am very hesitant to open a door too widely which we'll never be able to shut. But that's a separate proposal from this one.

 * I like this one because it is purely lexicographical, is very similar to the personal-name rule we already have, and looks perfectly compatible with future proposals for specific places. In fact, this proposal is a good step towards the other.

 * Re: “proper noun”, why have all the important dictionaries forsaken it if it's so useful? —Michael Z. 2009-08-08 21:12 z

 * I can't say for sure — my tenure on their boards was so brief that it literally ended before it began — but they tend to include almost no proper nouns at all, so I suppose it's not a useful category for them. The major exception would be dictionaries that are dedicated exclusively to some type of proper noun (e.g., place names), so dispense with POS labels entirely. That said, bilingual dictionaries in my experience do include a fair number of proper nouns, but tend not to distinguish them from common nouns. I don't know why not. —Ruakh TALK 23:14, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

 * Some of them have many proper nouns. (And how would having few make it less useful to the reader to note them?—it would just make it easier.) Some of them don't label these at all, and others mark them noun.

 * Professional lexicographers creating all of the best dictionaries are avoiding the use of the label “proper noun.” I don't think it's useful for us to write that off as incidental, and then congratulate ourselves for doing the opposite, without actually understanding why. —Michael Z. 2009-08-09 00:35 z

 * More specifically, why do you say that the distinction between "common noun" and "proper noun" is absolutely useful?  What use is it, and to which readers? —Michael Z. 2009-08-09 00:38 z

 * It's useful to readers who want to know how the word is used — same as and,  and . —Ruakh TALK 00:57, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

 * I what way are proper nouns used differently? If their difference is in usage, then why not add a usage label (like we do in [un]countable, [in]transitive)? —Michael Z. 2009-08-09 01:15 z

 * In many ways; see Appendix:English proper nouns. And yes, I think a sense label would be an improvement, since so many words have both common-noun and proper-noun uses. —Ruakh TALK 03:35, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

I don't care about philosophy, or whether place names ar accepted or not, but the definition "A common place name" does not suit the category system. "Category:Place names" is a topic category (It should really be Category:Places). If we recommend this definition, then for the sake of logic all the category names should be changed: "English/French names of cities" instead of "Cities/fr:Cities" etc.

Instead, I have always used definitions like "The capital city of France", "Any of a number of places in England, Canada and United States", etc. It's easy make a separate definition for important places, or places that have different translations in some language. But a separate definition for every place named San José is madness. Just make a link to the Wikipedia disambiguation page.--Makaokalani 12:37, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

 * I agree with your practical advice, but place names and surnames are categories of words (or of names, if you split hairs). Places and people are neither categories of words, nor subject fields in which specialized words are used—they are categories of things.

 * But we don't have entries for things, only for words. If we don't stop using encyclopedic categories, we will forever be trying to reduplicate Wikipedia's categories, badly.  We have enough work trying to manage our own lexicographical categories. —Michael Z. 2009-08-19 03:43 z

“Attested”
The use of “attested” doesn't seem quite right. The citation of a use of a word attests to its existence. But the existence of three cars doesn't attest the word car. I'm sure this can be made better by some mild copy-editing (but I'm too tired to try right now). Perhaps its the naming of three places that attests the name, rather than the existence of the places.... —Michael Z. 2009-08-07 05:04 z

Heading
This shouldn't just be “Place names”, since they may also be included through the Specific entities criterion or some other. “Common place names,” I think.

(And would it be disruptive to move this proposal from “placenames” to place names?) —Michael Z. 2009-08-07 05:07 z
 * I've changed the proposed WT:CFI heading. Imho the cost of moving the vote exceeds its benefit. —  msh210  ℠  18:39, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

"Common name"
Is the implication that a place-name can be considered "common" if there are three instances of it? —Ruakh TALK 20:37, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I didn't intend that in writing the proposal. I also intended others to edit it before it was un{ {premature}}d, but that didn't happen. I have my own reservations about this proposal. One is due to ambiguity. The question Ruakh asks in this section of the talkpage and the ones Mzajac asked in the preceding two point to an ambiguity in the text of the proposed addition to the CFI. Another ambiguous issue is about Elm. There are loads of streets named Elm, which therefore will be included under this proposal, at least the way I read it. Same for lots and lots and lots of other capitalized versions of common nouns. Is that really what we want? The proposal should have been modified before it was made live to explicitly include or exclude these (though, as I said, it seems pretty clearly to include them). I may vote against my own proposal for that reason alone: because it includes all those street names, which I'm really not all that sure we want. I'm blathering a bit here, I think, but my point is that I regret being away for several days while this vote went live. —  msh210  ℠  20:05, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Given how little turnout there's been so far, I don't think anyone would object if you re--ed it (de-matured?) and postpone the vote while you figure stuff out. (BTW, it hadn't occurred to me to think of a street as a "place", but now that you mention it, I suppose it is one.) —Ruakh TALK 21:45, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

 * I thought it might be rude to edit someone's proposal without their consent. I don't mind if you reboot the vote, or even make one or more variations to choose from.

 * Yeah, even defining what is a place is nebulous, but for the most part we know one when we see one.  If a town is a place, then why not a neighbourhood (Soho), a square (St. Mark's Place), a park (Central Park), a market (the Forum), a street (the Mall [why the heck is the headword The Mall?]), a bridge (the Rialto), a stair (the Spanish Steps), a palace grounds (Versailles), a fort (the Alamo), a walled castle (the Louvre), a palace (Piazza Navona), a government house (Parliament Hill), a monument (the Arc de Triomphe), a tower (the Peace Tower), etc?  (I realize only a few of these will fall under the three places clause, but I'm thinking about what is a place.) —Michael Z. 2009-08-10 22:50 z
 * Re "to edit someone's proposal without their consent": Feel free! —  msh210  ℠  00:46, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Fine, I'll strike the votes and reinstate . Thanks to all who commented on this page for input so far. What do y'all think of Elm et al.? —  msh210  ℠  18:31, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

 * Why adding "common"? Uncommon placenames are of interest to fewer readers, but we want all words, not only common words. Lmaltier 19:57, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * To help Mzajac, I feel the criterion should look more or less like : When a kind of placename is, by nature, composed of several words, it's not included (e.g. street names, castles, towers, hotels, monuments, bridges...), except when it's a single word (e.g. Canebière, Rialto) or when there is a special linguistic reason to include it (cf. current CFI). All placenames considered as words are includable (e.g. town or village names). I also think that seas should be included, but they are in the grey area. Lmaltier 20:06, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

 * I don't get it. What does that help, and why accept names based on how many words they are composed of?  I think all of the places I mentioned should be candidates, and I'm sure I could come up with comparable one-word examples.  Why accept Broadway but not Park Avenue, Soho but not Hell's Kitchen, Rialto but not Ponte Vecchio, Pentominium but not Taipei 101, Schwarzwald but not Black Forest, etc?  This would also favour place names in some languages which run words together to form names. —Michael Z. 2009-08-12 05:17 z
 * To clarify: I use word with its linguistic sense, not with its typographic sense. New York is a word composed of two "typographic words". But I think that Park Avenue is not a word, because, in English, street names are traditionally considered as composed of several words put together (the same applies to full names such as Winston Churchill). Yes, this could favour placenames in some languages : if odonyms (e.g. Seeplatz) are considered as words in German, they could be accepted (and it's an issue to be discussed further, because it would be very strange, I agree). Lmaltier 06:03, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

 * I see, but why? (Orthographic words might be a better name; it's about written form, but not typesetting.)  There are many exceptions, which don't automatically merit inclusion any more or less than than "traditionally" multipart names. —Michael Z. 2009-08-12 13:27 z
 * Typographic is the right term, I think. Typographs consider New York are being two words. Linguists consider New York or chemin de fer as single words, but I think that they do not consider Winston Churchill as a word, but rather as a name composed of two words. w:Word helps and I think the article does not disagree with me, but it doesn't address all cases, unfortunately. Lmaltier 21:11, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

 * It has nothing specifically to do with typography or typesetting (or typographers). Your point is that it is written as two words, whether in pencil, with a quill, set in type, spray painted on a wall, or in 5-metre high steel letters.  The written form is orthography, so this is an orthographic quality.  w:Word totally agrees with me on this, not with you.  But this is neither here nor there.

 * You still haven't mentioned why you think we should only include 1-word names. —Michael Z. 2009-08-17 03:40 z
 * (Unindent) My understanding has always been that a string of characters that contains a space such as "black hole" is a two-word term and a lexical item but not a word. I do not have any citation for this, though. To make things unambiguous, we can use the term "space-free word" or something of the sort, but it seems redundant to me if most people read "word" as "space-free word" anyway.
 * The space between the two words in "black hole" is not only in print and writing but can also be heard in speech AFAICT, so it is of broad linguistic interest, not only of interest to typographers. --Dan Polansky 07:58, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

 * But in Wiktionary we explicitly say term to avoid the question of what is a “word.” Each entry is for a term whose identity is defined by attestation, irreducibility, idiomaticity, etc.  Introducing a requirement for one-word terminess is unprecedented here, and I don't see any justification for it. —Michael Z. 2009-08-19 09:03 z
 * I agree with the first two sentences. I don't understand the third sentence; I don't get what you mean by "one-word terminess", what requirement do you mean and who proposed that requirement, but maybe I just did not follow the discussion close enough. My point was only that in the terminology I am used to, "black hole" is not a word. --Dan Polansky 09:23, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

 * I'm talking about Lmaltier's When a kind of placename is, by nature, composed of several words, it's not included. He's proposing or explaining that we should only include 1-word place names.  But we don't restrict inclusion in this way.  No one has suggested why we should treat place names so completely differently than everything else in the dictionary.

 * Of course black hole is a word. If you want to get picky, then I'll call it a term or a lexical unit, but that's what we deal with around here. —Michael Z. 2009-08-19 18:07 z
 * I am above all trying to understand what you mean by "word". It does not come as a matter of course to me that "black hole" is a word; hence my felt need for clarification. So by your definition and usage, words may include spaces. Good to know. Do you count proverbs as words? And do you consider "Thank you" to be a word? --Dan Polansky 06:45, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

 * Yeah, I also don't consider "black hole" to be a word. It's an idiom. Not only do we write it with a space in the middle, but we also pronounce it spondaically. Grammatically, it does have some word-ness, in that you would say "a big black hole" (not *"a big, black hole", nor *"a big and black hole"), but it also has some phrase-ness, in that you can describe North Korea as "a very black hole" (with "very" modifying "black"). —Ruakh TALK 12:11, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

 * What's the point? That we should remove multi-word terms from our CFI?  Or that we should continue to handle the 100 other types of terms the same way but place names completely differently?  Black hole is a word as far as Wiktionary is concerned, and no one has provided a reason that the Forum should be but The Mall should not. —Michael Z. 2009-08-20 14:09 z

 * My point is that you need to be clear with your terminology — something that you and Lmaltier are both failing signally at. My point is that neither one of you has made your actual points in a way that I can be sure I understand — or that anyone can be sure they understand, aside from yourself and himself — because you keep using the word "word" as though it meant something specific, objective, and universally acknowledged — which it doesn't, even if you explicitly state that it doesn't mean "orthographic word". Finally, my point is that the CFI explicitly include multi-word terms without pretending that they're "words", and a placename proposal can't suddenly start using the word "word" in a way that contradicts that — whether or not the proposal the proposal restricts us to single-word placenames. —Ruakh TALK 15:09, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Allow me to try to explain, though על רגל אחת as we say in Hebrew, why this proposal aims to include Forum but not The Mall. Better yet, in order to avoid extraneous issues (relating to Elm, noted above, which also apply here), I'll discuss instead York and New York, which are analogous, I think, for these purposes. York is the name of a specific place (more than one, actually). New York is, too. But this proposal is not about including names of specific places. That's already covered in the CFI (although people wish to change that criterion. But that's not what this proposal is about). This proposal is aimed at the person who looks up a word, either not knowing it's a place name (in which case he wouldn't know that New York is one word, or term, or name, or whatever), or just to find out the pronunciation or etymology or what-have-you (in which case he's as likely, usually, to look up York as New York). That's the reason I (as original author of the proposal) wish to include York but not New York (and certainly not Stratford-on-Avon or River Thames or Foo Street). —  msh210  ℠  16:39, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

timing
There is something amiss in the timing of the vote - on the one hand there is the template designating it as not yet started, but on the other hand the end of the vote is stated to be 16 September. How is this discrepancy to be redressed? The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 13:21, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Whoever starts it can reset the start and end times. —  msh210  ℠  18:48, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Vote on placenames
You would make me quite happy if you would formally withdraw the vote Votes/pl-2009-08/Common placenames get entries, by placing a note to the vote that says that you withdraw the vote. As you know, the vote has been superseded by a recent vote on placenames (geographic names). I would then remove the vote from the list of pending votes at WT:Votes. --Dan Polansky 06:10, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * It hasn't really been superseded. The vote which has passed is about names of particular places, whereas the vote you're asking me to withdraw is about words found in placenames generally. (That's not worded clearly at all, but see .) They can both pass, and will affect different entries (though some of the same ones, too, natch.) However, this is a wiki, and if you want to declare the vote canceled and remove it from WT:V, go right ahead. —msh210℠ 15:16, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * There we are; I thought the vote was superseded, but you don't think so. Good that I have asked. If you do not plan to withdraw the vote, it can sit in WT:Votes as you see fit. I thought the vote was no longer on agenda. --Dan Polansky 15:44, 19 October 2010 (UTC)


text: gònghéguó

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: gònghéguó


text:
archianellide

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) archiannelid

title: archianellide


text: Category:Italian terms prefixed with archi-


text: gyógyászatok

title: gyógyászatok


text: létrák

title: létrák


text: Category:Hungarian verbs suffixed with -at


text: Category:Ainu prefixes

title: Category:Ainu prefixes


text:
juodoji skylė

Noun

 * 1)  black hole

title: juodoji skylė


text:
archiatra

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) archiater (especially to a Pope)

title: archiatra


text: juodoji

title: juodoji


text:
archibugetto

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) a small arquebus once used for hunting

title: archibugetto


text:
archibugiere

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) arquebusier (soldier armed with an arquebus)

title: archibugiere


text: schwarze Löcher

title: schwarze Löcher


text:
archibugio

Etymology
, derived from.

Noun

 * 1)  arquebus

title: archibugio


text:
skylė

Noun

 * 1) hole; opening

title: skylė


text: Löcher

title: Löcher


text: Lochs

title: Lochs


text: Loches

title: Loches


text:
létre-

Etymology
From the inflected noun, from.

Prefix

 * 1)  into being, into existence

title: létre-


text: ее

title: ее


text: schwarzen Lochs

title: schwarzen Lochs


text: schwarzen Loches

title: schwarzen Loches


text: archibugieri

title: archibugieri


text:
archicembalo

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  A form of harpsichord that had extra keys and strings

Etymology
From.

title: archicembalo


text:
archicorteccia

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  archicortex

title: archicorteccia


text: hungriger

title: hungriger


text: hungrigsten

title: hungrigsten


text:
bourru

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) surly; gruff

title: bourru


text: levendulák

title: levendulák


text: leventék

title: leventék


text: archimandriti

title: archimandriti


text:
vachère

Etymology
See

Noun

 * 1) cowgirl

title: vachère


text:
beleibt

Adjective

 * 1)  overweight

title: beleibt


text: beleibter

title: beleibter


text: beleibtesten

title: beleibtesten


text:
奇し

Etymology
Cognate with.

Adjective

 * 1) mystical

title: 奇し


text:
belebt

Adjective

 * 1) enlivened, having life, animated, busy
 * 2)  animate

title: belebt


text: belebter

title: belebter


text: belebtesten

title: belebtesten


text:
chaumière

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) thatched cottage
 * 2) * 1795, Sébastien-Roch Nicolas de Chamfort, Maximes et pensées, chapitre I, Maximes générales
 * "fr"

- L’ambition prend aux petites âmes plus facilement qu’aux grandes, comme le feu prend plus aisément à la paille, aux chaumières qu'aux palais.

 * 1)  (small rural) cottage
 * 1)  (small rural) cottage

title: chaumière


text:
archipendolo

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) perpendiculum (early form of plumb line)

title: archipendolo


text: levesek

title: levesek


text: Category:Navajo adverbs

title: Category:Navajo adverbs


text: lézerek

title: lézerek


text: libák

title: libák


text:
archivolto

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  archivolt

title: archivolto


text: Category:Navajo postpositions

title: Category:Navajo postpositions


text: libaúsztatók

title: libaúsztatók


text:
gronderie

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) scolding

title: gronderie


text: lidércnyomások

title: lidércnyomások


text:
rzemiosło

Etymology
. Cognate with 🇨🇬 and 🇨🇬. Further akin to 🇨🇬 and 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) craft, trade
 * 2) craftsmanship
 * 3) occupation, profession, trade
 * 1) occupation, profession, trade
 * 1) occupation, profession, trade

title: rzemiosło


text: likőrök

title: likőrök


text: limonádék

title: limonádék


text:
effaroucher

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to scare off, frighten away (an animal)
 * 2)  to frighten, alarm (someone)
 * 3)  to shock

title: effaroucher


text:
ボット

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1)  bot, a piece of software for doing repetitive tasks

title: ボット


text:
User talk:91.106.34.19

Pinyin entries
Before adding a definition to a Pinyin entry, please examine the definitions that are already present. The definitions you have added were already present in the entries. --EncycloPetey 14:48, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I am adding a definition to a "Mandarin word" entry but not a "pinyin syllable" entry.

title: User talk:91.106.34.19


text: 暧昧

title: 暧昧


text:
tökéletlen

Etymology
From obsolete.

Adjective

 * 1) imperfect not perfect

title: tökéletlen


text:
collerette

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  ruff
 * 2) collarette
 * 3)  ring, annulus
 * 4)  flange

title: collerette


text:
localement

Etymology
From.

Adverb

 * 1) locally (with respect to location)

title: localement


text: Category:Lower Sorbian given names

title: Category:Lower Sorbian given names


text:
Alojs

Proper noun

 * , corresponding to Aloysius

title: Alojs


text: Category:Lower Sorbian male given names

title: Category:Lower Sorbian male given names


text:
Talk:letölt

Senses
We need the sense "letölti a büntetését" but I'm not so good in English to translate it. Qorilla 15:20, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Added. --Panda10 15:53, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:letölt


text:
καλιφόρνιο

Noun

 * 1) californium

Coordinate terms

 * Appendix:Greek names for chemical elements

title: καλιφόρνιο


text:
カリホルニウム

Noun

 * 1) californium

title: カリホルニウム


text:
califórnio

Noun

 * 1) californium

title: califórnio


text:
californiu

Noun

 * 1) californium

Etymology
or.

Noun

 * 1) californium (chemical element)

title: californiu


text:
Borbora

Etymology
From, from.

title: Borbora


text: Category:Lower Sorbian female given names


text: Template:yue-jyut

title: Template:yue-jyut


text:
avunculaire

Etymology
From +.

Adjective

 * 1)  uncle; avuncular

title: avunculaire


text: Category:Hungarian nouns suffixed with -et


text: premiere danseuse

title: premiere danseuse


text:
vogelspin

Etymology
Compound of 🇰🇲.

Noun

 * 1)  true tarantula, spider of the family
 * 2)  any large, hairy spider resembling a tarantula

Related terms

 * (adjective)
 * (adjective)
 * (adjective)
 * (adjective)

title: vogelspin


text:
Latinalainen Amerikka

Etymology
From +.

Proper noun

 * 1) Latin America

title: Latinalainen Amerikka


text:
Amérique latine

Proper noun

 * 1) Latin America

title: Amérique latine


title: ban2


text:
Lateinamerika

Proper noun

 * 1) Latin America

title: Lateinamerika


text:
Appendix:Lower Sorbian given names

The Sorbian language is divided in Lower Sorbian and Upper Sorbian and is spoken in a parts of Germany. Each language has its own given names, which are similar to those in the other West Slavic languages, Polish and Czech.

= Male =

A

 * Abraham
 * Alojs
 * Ambróz
 * Arnošt

B

 * Bałcar
 * Bałdrian
 * Bartrołm
 * Batrołm
 * Bjarnat
 * Bjedrich
 * Bjenada
 * Błaza
 * Błazij
 * Bohuměr
 * Bohumił
 * Bolesław
 * Bosćan
 * Bosćij
 * Bosćijan
 * Branibor

C

 * Cyril

D

 * Dan
 * Demjan
 * Domaš
 * Dominik

F

 * Filip
 * Franc
 * Fryc

G

 * German

H

 * Hadam
 * Handrij
 * Hans
 * Hansk
 * Hantuš
 * Hanuš
 * Hawẛ
 * Hawoẛ
 * Hawštyn
 * Hendrich
 * Hinc
 * Hindrach
 * Hindrašk
 * Hórban
 * Hrjehor

Z
= Female =

A

 * Amerika
 * Atheny

B

 * Borbora
 * Bratisława
 * Briša

D

 * Dorota
 * Dorta
 * Dżiwona

H

 * Hana
 * Hančička
 * Hanica
 * Hanka
 * Hańža
 * Hańžička
 * Hańžka
 * Hapla
 * Haplona
 * Hapula
 * Hapulona
 * Herta
 * Hiacinta
 * Hilža
 * Hilžbjeta

title: Appendix:Lower Sorbian given names


title: ban6


text:
en jarras

Etymology
From, from the resemblance of the posture to a handled jug.

Adverb

 * 1)  akimbo, with arms bent and hands on the hips

title: en jarras


text:
cacaoboom

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  The cacao tree,

title: cacaoboom


title: User:Hope&Act3!


text:
gaa1

Romanization

 * 1)  house, family
 * 2)  plus; increase
 * 3)  eggplant
 * 4)  furniture
 * 5)  auspicious
 * 1)  auspicious

title: gaa1


text:
kaakaopuu

Noun

 * 1) cacao cacao tree

title: kaakaopuu


text:
zeot1

Romanization

 * 1)  rub
 * 2)  soldier, servant; underling
 * 1)  soldier, servant; underling

title: zeot1


text:
κουφάρι

Etymology
From, from.

Noun

 * 1)  corpse, carcass, carrion
 * 2)  hull

title: κουφάρι


text: tusák

title: tusák


text: lovastusák

title: lovastusák


text: parapsychologies

title: parapsychologies


text: lőszerek

title: lőszerek


text:
волк каждый год линяет, а всё сер бывает

Etymology
lit. 'each year the wolf molts its fur, but it continues to be grey'.

Proverb

 * 1) the wolf may lose his teeth but never his nature, a leopard cannot change its spots


text: lőszerraktárak

title: lőszerraktárak


text:
ghosthunter

Noun

 * 1) A person who attempts to track down ghosts.

Translations

 * French: chasseur de fantôme,
 * German: Geisterjäger, Geisterjägerin
 * Italian: acchiappafantasmi
 * Portuguese:, caça-fantasmas
 * Romanian: vânător de fantome
 * Spanish: cazafantasmas
 * Swedish: spökjägare

title: ghosthunter


text: ghosthunters

title: ghosthunters


text:
алчен

Etymology
, from.

Adjective

 * 1) covetous, greedy

Etymology
, from.

Adjective

 * 1) covetous, greedy, avaricious

title: алчен


text:
Citations:cum dumpster

 * 1) *2009, Dan Harkins, "Lust: A Long Day's Journey Into Night," The Cleveland Free Times, Volume 15, Issue 93, March 3rd, 2009:
 * As if Brookpark Road weren't storied enough for its historic embrace of Douchebag Chic, it now has a proper monument: This Days Inn was recently recognized by Tripadvisor.com for being an utter cum dumpster, placing fifth in the highly frequented site's annual Top 10 Dirtiest Hotels in the U.S. Under headings such as "A Truly Terrible Place," "Revolting!," "Beware!!! Stay Away!!!" and "Absolutely Disgusting," reviewers can't contain their disgust.

title: Citations:cum dumpster


text: lövészek

title: lövészek


text:
chaland

Etymology 1
, the present participle of.

Noun

 * 1) a regular client, a returning client; a customer (in the etymological sense)

Etymology 2
.

Noun

 * 1) barge (flat-bottomed bulk carrier mainly for inland waters)

title: chaland


text: User:Eroica

title: User:Eroica


text:
unvisionary

Adjective

 * 1) Not visionary.

title: unvisionary


text: lugasok

title: lugasok


text:
зъболекарка

Noun

 * : female dentist

title: зъболекарка


text: macskakörmök

title: macskakörmök


text: madarat

title: madarat


text: madrigálok

title: madrigálok


text: madzagok

title: madzagok


text: magánhangzók

title: magánhangzók


text:
qh

Alternative forms

 * q.h.

Etymology
of (supply ).

Adverb

 * 1)  quaque hora: every hour - used in medical pharmacy prescriptions usually with a numeral defining hours between doses. "q4h" read as: "taken every 4 hours". Also common is the format: "3 caps q4h" read as" means "Take 3 capsules every 4 hours."

title: qh


text:
колежка

Noun

 * : female colleague, female mate
 * : female fellow student

title: колежка


text:
колачка

Noun

 * : female butcher, female slaughterer, female feller

title: колачка


text:
комунистка

Noun

 * : female communist

Noun

 * 1) communist (female)

title: комунистка


text:
vergas

Etymology
Ultimately from a derivative of.

Noun

 * 1) slave

title: vergas


text: vergajazos

title: vergajazos


text: vergonas

title: vergonas


text: vergones

title: vergones


text: vergona

title: vergona


text: magatartások

title: magatartások


text: máglyák

title: máglyák


text: mágnesek

title: mágnesek


text: mágusok

title: mágusok


text:
котарак

Etymology
From unattested +

Noun

 * 1) tomcat, male cat

title: котарак


text:
谷精上腦

Verb

 * 1)  to be sexually frustrated; to become sexually obsessed due to “lack of sperm emission”

title: 谷精上腦


text: 唂精上脑

title: 唂精上脑


text:
dérober

Etymology
, from, from , the latter from , from , from.

Verb

 * 1)  to conceal, screen, shield (à from)
 * 2)  to steal (à from)
 * 3)  to turn away (one's head, gaze etc.)
 * 4)  to shirk, shy away (à from)
 * 5)  to hide (oneself)
 * 6)  to slip away (free oneself)
 * 7)  to give way (collapse)
 * 8)  to refuse
 * 1)  to refuse

title: dérober


title: je5


title: man5


text:
кралица

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * : queen

Etymology
, from.

Noun

 * 1) queen
 * 2)  queen

title: кралица


text:
unintriguing

Adjective

 * 1) Not involving oneself in secret plots or schemes.

title: unintriguing


text:
unintrigued

Adjective

 * 1) Not intrigued; uninterested.

title: unintrigued


text:
cahot

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) jolt, bump

title: cahot


text:
красавец

Noun

 * 1) handsome man, male beauty

Noun

 * 1) a beauty, a handsome man or beautiful object

title: красавец


text: cahots

title: cahots


text:
кучка

Etymology
Feminine of.

Noun

 * : bitch (female dog)

Etymology
Feminine of.

Noun

 * 1) bitch (female dog)
 * 2) bitch (insult)

Noun

 * : small heap

Etymology
Feminine of.

Noun

 * 1) bitch, dam (female dog)
 * 2)  bitch (spiteful woman)

title: кучка


text: magyarázatok

title: magyarázatok


text:
գրամեքենա

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) typewriter

title: գրամեքենա


text:
кълвачка

Noun

 * : female woodpecker, female flicker
 * : female swot, female person who mugs up

title: кълвачка


text: ribbitting

title: ribbitting


text: ribbitted

title: ribbitted


text:
Template:U:fr:1990 reform spelling

This spelling was a product of the 1990 French spelling reforms.

title: Template:U:fr:1990 reform spelling


text: májak

title: májak


text:
afrohem

Verb

 * 1) to approach, come closer
 * 2) to get closer to, familiarise with
 * 3) to resemble, be similar
 * 1) to get closer to, familiarise with
 * 2) to resemble, be similar

title: afrohem


text:
шприц

Noun

 * 1) syringe

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) syringe

Etymology
, from.

Noun

 * 1) syringe

Etymology
, from.

Noun

 * 1) syringe

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) syringe

title: шприц


text: mákgubók

title: mákgubók


text: malacperselyek

title: malacperselyek


text:
ներարկիչ

Noun

 * 1) syringe

title: ներարկիչ


text:
շպրից

Etymology
From, from. The corrupt version is perhaps influenced by the agentive suffix.

Noun

 * 1)  syringe

title: շպրից


text: սպրիչ

title: սպրիչ


text: mamák

title: mamák


text: mamuszok

title: mamuszok


text:
távozik

Etymology
From the same root as. First attested after 1372.

Verb

 * 1)  to leave, to go away to quit the community of the others or leave a place

title: távozik


text: Category:Serbo-Croatian interjections

title: Category:Serbo-Croatian interjections


text:
Citations:milosrđe

 * Đuro Sudeta, Zaborav, lines 13, 16-18
 * Možda si se sjetila tada (...)
 * I da je milosrđe tvoje
 * i ljubav bila što te pokajanu
 * dovela amo na dan smrti moje.

title: Citations:milosrđe


text:
ճառ

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) speech, oration; harangue
 * 2) tirade
 * 1) tirade

Etymology
The origin is.

Noun

 * 1) discourse, harangue, oration, sermon, allocution
 * 2) dissertation; history; treatise; narration, recital
 * 1) dissertation; history; treatise; narration, recital
 * 1) dissertation; history; treatise; narration, recital
 * 1) dissertation; history; treatise; narration, recital
 * 1) dissertation; history; treatise; narration, recital
 * 1) dissertation; history; treatise; narration, recital
 * 1) dissertation; history; treatise; narration, recital

title: ճառ


text:
милосрђе

Etymology
. Compare 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) compassion
 * 2) mercy
 * 3) pity
 * 4) a merciful act

Related terms

 * ми̏лоср̄да

title: милосрђе


text:
снаха

Etymology
From, from.

Noun

 * 1) daughter-in-law (wife of one's son)
 * 2) sister-in-law (wife of one's brother)

Etymology
, from.

Noun

 * 1) daughter-in-law (wife of one's son)
 * 2) sister-in-law (wife of one's brother)

title: снаха


text: mangók

title: mangók


text: manók

title: manók


text: manzárdszobák

title: manzárdszobák


text:
čar

Noun

 * 1) country, nation

Etymology
(Russian, Polish ), from (Sanskrit , Lithuanian ). Slavic forms with (compare ) presuppose a nominal lengthened-grade derivation, i.e. Proto-Balto-Slavic  (Lithuanian ). Serbo-Croatian i-stem is probably an archaism - lengthened grade is expected in PIE root nouns which yield Balto-Slavic i-stems. PIE root probably already had magical connotations, i.e. denoting remote action by magical means. First attested in the 16th century.

Noun

 * 1) charm, allure
 * 2) spell, magic

title: čar


text:
elmegy

Verb

 * 1)  to go to some place
 * 2)  to go to/and see someone used with
 * 3)  to leave, to go away, to walk away, to drive away
 * 4)  to be just barely good enough, to be barely okay
 * 5)  to cum, to come to have an orgasm
 * 6)  to pass away, to die
 * 1)  to be just barely good enough, to be barely okay
 * 2)  to cum, to come to have an orgasm
 * 3)  to pass away, to die
 * 1)  to pass away, to die
 * 1)  to pass away, to die

title: elmegy


text: mártások

title: mártások


text:
criteriologia

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) criteriology

title: criteriologia


text:
cronobiologia

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) chronobiology

Noun

 * 1)  chronobiology study of the effects of time on biological systems

title: cronobiologia


text: panthea

title: panthea


text: mássalhangzók

title: mássalhangzók


text:
Citations:puteljak

 * 1920, Antun Branko Šimić, Samoća na vodi, line 24
 * I ljudi iščeznu na prvom zaokretu strmih puteljaka

title: Citations:puteljak


text:
járkál

Verb

 * 1)  to walk about, to wander around

title: járkál


text: matracok

title: matracok


text: matrónák

title: matrónák


text: matrózok

title: matrózok


text: mecénások

title: mecénások


text: mécsek

title: mécsek


text: medencék

title: medencék


text:
Talk:реп

реп
Skok quotes A. Matzenauer's theory of the kinship between this Serbo-Croatian word and German. How can we mention this? Probably cognate with German ? The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 19:48, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

 * Well, SC word is a reflex of Common Slavic *rępъ (Polish, dialectal Ukrainian ) which itself is apparently of obscure origin. German word traces to MLG rump: < Proto-Germanic *xrumpaz, which you cannot formally match to Proto-Slavic word because the sequence -um- would've yielded Common Slavic *ǫ and not *ę, which presupposes pre-form with *-em-/*-en- or *-im-/*-in-. Common Germanic reconstruction furthermore doesn't really agree with Common Slavic reconstruction in meaning, which renders the connection rather dubious. I wouldn't mention Matzenauer's speculation unless it can be corroborated by additional evidence, as the match is far from ideal. --Ivan Štambuk 20:19, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * But they do differ in meaning, as trunk, torso is dissimilar from tail. Moreover, according to Gebrüder Grimm, Rumpf descends from an older verb rimpfen (Prät. rampf, P.P. gerumpfen), so the pre-form with *-im- is at hand. The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 20:44, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I did say that they do differ in meaning, and that is one of the argument why they could not be related! My sources (Vladimir Orel's lexicon of Proto-Germanic from 2003) say that the German word is descended from MLG form, and the shift /p/ > /pf/ is perfectly in accordance with High German consonant shift, and given the cognates in other Germanic languages (Orel mentions only dialectal Norwegian and Middle English rump: - the scarcity of which disturbs me), it's highly unlikely that the the etymology by Gebrüder Grimm made in times of advent of Indo-Europeans Studies can be held as plausible today..
 * Germanic borrowings into Proto-Slavic, which were quite excessively assigned in the past, are today very meticulously analyzed, and it is highly unlikely that these two proto-words, *rępъ and *xrumpaz, incompatible both formally and semantically, will be accepted as related in some general etymologist circles.. I must strongly suggest that we drop this one, unless some recent up-to-date research proves otherwise. --Ivan Štambuk 01:59, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Also rap (music)?
Can't this also translate as "rap" (music), and also in Ukrainian? 173.88.246.138 21:53, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

 * In Russian, it would be рэп. In Ukrainian, реп can translate as "rap" (music). 70.172.194.25 21:56, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

title: Talk:реп


text: Category:xcl:Sports

title: Category:xcl:Sports


text:
ըմբշամարտութիւն

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) wrestling

title: ըմբշամարտութիւն


text:
down the tubes

Prepositional phrase

 * : wasted; irretrievable.

title: down the tubes


text: meghívások

title: meghívások


text: down the tube

title: down the tube


text:
батарейка

Etymology
Diminutive of.

Noun

 * 1) small electric battery, baby battery

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * : battery

title: батарейка


text:
Citations:sunčati

 * 1920, Antun Branko Šimić, Podne i bolesnik, lines 6-9
 * U vrtovima sunčaju se gole djevojke
 * i plavi mlaz visoka vodoskoka
 * u plavu prazninu
 * šumi

title: Citations:sunčati


text:
Talk:jogar

Etymology
How do we know it was created with "szivar" and "ivar" in mind? The suffix of címer seems to be the pair of this -ar. Qorilla 20:05, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

 * According to Gábor Zaicz: "Származékszó, amely tudatos szóalkotással keletkezett, alapszava a jog főnév, végződése pedig a tévesen képzőnek értelmezett -ar, vö. szivar, ivar. Valószínűleg Bajza József alkotta meg a nyelvújítás korában a latin sceptrum 'jogar' magyarítására a túlságosan hosszúnak tartott királyi pálca, kormányzópálca helyett."  --Panda10 20:13, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:jogar


text:
User talk:De novo

welcome
Welcome!

Hello, welcome to Wiktionary, and thank you for your contribution so far. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

 * How to edit a page is a concise list of technical guidelines to the wiki format we use here: how to, for example, make text boldfaced or create hyperlinks. Feel free to practice in the sandbox. If you would like a slower introduction we have a short tutorial.
 * Entry layout explained (ELE) is a detailed policy documenting how Wiktionary pages should be formatted. All entries should conform to this standard, the easiest way to do this is to copy exactly an existing page for a similar word.
 * Our Criteria for inclusion (CFI) define exactly which words Wiktionary is interested in including, there is also a list of things that Wiktionary is not for a higher level overview.
 * The FAQ aims to answer most of your remaining questions, and there are several help pages that you can browse for more information.
 * We have discussion rooms in which you can ask any question about Wiktionary or its entries, a glossary of our technical jargon, and some hints for dealing with the more common communication issues.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wiktionarian! If you have any questions, bring them to the Information desk, or ask me on my talk page. If you do so, please sign your posts with four tildes: ~ which automatically produces your username and the current date and time.

Again, welcome! --EncycloPetey 20:23, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Latin suffixes
The endings -um and -us are not suffixes in Latin; they are inflectional endings for nouns, adjectives, and participles. --EncycloPetey 20:23, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

title: User talk:De novo


text:
User talk:212.251.229.193

Please do not add a horizontal rule  after an inflection section. The horizontal rule should only appear between sections for different languages. --EncycloPetey 20:28, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Also, please do not use Danish templates in sections for Norwegian words. --EncycloPetey 20:30, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

title: User talk:212.251.229.193


text:
germogliamento

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) germination

title: germogliamento


text: megoldások

title: megoldások


text:
alaktan

Noun

 * 1)  morphology

title: alaktan


text: anastases

title: anastases


text:
neoministro

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) newly-appointed minister

title: neoministro


text:
anastatic

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) Of or pertaining to anastasis.
 * 2)  Of or relating to a printing process in which copies of drawings are printed from facsimiles produced in relief on zinc plates.

Translations

 * Italian:

 * Polish: anastatyczny

Etymology
.

title: anastatic


text:
geospheric

Adjective

 * 1) Of or pertaining to the geosphere.

title: geospheric


text:
anastatically

Adverb

 * 1) In an anastatic way.

title: anastatically


text:
Citations:micati

 * 1920, Antun Branko Šimić, Povratak, lines 12-16
 * I kad kroz suton vidiš crnu sjenku što se miče
 * s onu stranu mrke mirne vode
 * znaj:
 * ja koračam uspravan i svečan
 * kao pored tebe

title: Citations:micati


text: méhészek

title: méhészek


text:
porticina

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) little door

title: porticina


text:
qualitativamente

Etymology
From.

Adverb

 * 1) qualitatively

title: qualitativamente


text:
radicazione

Noun

 * 1) rooting

title: radicazione


text:
sequenziamento

Noun

 * 1)  sequencing

title: sequenziamento


text: mellények

title: mellények


text:
stradone

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) avenue, wide road, often a tree-lined one
 * 1) avenue, wide road, often a tree-lined one

title: stradone


text: mellkasok

title: mellkasok


text:
սուպերմարկետ

Noun

 * 1) supermarket

title: սուպերմարկետ


text:
Template:sq-conj-2

Standard Albanian conjugation of (mediopassive conjugation)
 * Show compound tenses:

title: Template:sq-conj-2


text:
առնեմ

Etymology
The root is, from ,. The aorist stem is a reduplication of the same root. Cognate with 🇨🇬 (imperfect, perfect ; compare and ) and 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1) to make, do, form, produce, compose, fabric, operate, act, render, commit, effectuate, execute, cause

Usage notes
This word usually forms compounds with its aorist stem.

title: առնեմ


text: Template:sq-conj-ohem

title: Template:sq-conj-ohem


text:
MSN generation

Etymology
+, on the pattern of etc.

Proper noun

 * 1)  The Noughties generation of Web-savvy youngsters who conducted a significant proportion of their socialising via Internet media such as instant messaging clients and social networking sites.
 * 2) * 2007: “Steve Firth”, uk.business.agriculture (Google group): Top Gear, the 27th day of February at 10:36pm
 * > who he was showing off, there was nobody about, so I clicked a few buttons, a tiny camera on the laptop caught me in action… Eerie. It’s a fairly standard part of laptops aimed at the Web aware. The Apple laptops have a similar feature, it seems to be a must-have for the MSN generation.
 * 1) * 2008: “freek123456@googlemail.com”, “alt.drugs.hard (Google group): Is this true?”, the 19th day of October at 2:34pm
 * Dont think that language capabilities going to hell is a US matter only in the UK also in the NL kids age 13–14, called the MSN generation, write on a way whom requires a translator their age. For example i saw the words from a girl who wanted to write down ‘i have a gorgeous bf he is 16 and i love him and will see him next weekend’ the result was ‘iam has a gawjess bf hes 16 lof him wil cee him neks wiekent.'

title: MSN generation


text:
lanteilla

Adverb

 * 1)  akimbo

title: lanteilla


text:
Talk:extenuating circumstances

extenuating circumstances
Was a poorly formed IP addition. Was tempted to simply delete as SoP, but thought I'd bring it here for discussion instead to see if people think it is a specific enough legal term to warrant keeping as it is being linked to. — Carolina wren discussió 01:58, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

 * Keep, commonly used law term, as far as I know. If it doesn't warrant its own entry, an appendix of words related to law should include it. — [ ric ] opiaterein — 12:32, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

 * Is it listed in legal dictionaries? Then it passes the lemming test. DAVilla 01:07, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, in 3 OneLook "legal dictionaries". DCDuring TALK 22:49, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

 * Keep, however I don't think you can have just one extenuating circumstance, but I'd have said I hear this phrase quite often in a legal/political context. Mglovesfun 22:10, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I've just pressed preview and it's coming up in blue. Crap. Mglovesfun 22:10, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

 * Is the death of a family member an extenuating circumstance? —Stephen 22:25, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Kept. —Ruakh TALK 13:46, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:extenuating circumstances


text:
hearie

Noun

 * 1)  A person who can hear.

Usage notes

 * This term is used mainly in the Deaf community.

title: hearie


text:
Talk:playright

playright
This is not an acceptable alternate of playwright according to the OED, nor can it be found in any other dictionary source. Thanks. -Sketchmoose 15:43, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
 * No - it is a totally different word. the OED has this (under "play") - playright n. Obs. an author's proprietary right of performance of a musical or dramatic composition. SemperBlotto 15:50, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
 * keep. At worst this entry needs the obsolete legal sense. The RfD once more raises the question of what makes a spelling a misspelling vs. an alternative spelling and may also raise the queston of what makes a misspelling a "common" one. There are many current uses of the term in edited works where "playwright" might be preferred by some (like me). In any event, no speedy deletion. DCDuring TALK 17:22, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I have inserted "common" misspelling and given it an "rfd-sense" tag to take advantage of any attention this entry may have so far received to get more attention to the alternative/mis-spelling question. DCDuring TALK 17:30, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
 * This is fine with a proper definition. Before, all that was there was "alternate spelling of playwright" which is simply not correct, and I had never heard of it used in the "proprietary rights" sense so I didn't know to correct it to that (nor was it turned up in any of my dictionary searches, presumably due to its obsolescence).  Thanks for looking in to it. -Sketchmoose 22:41, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
 * It may well go back to being an alternative spelling based on being fairly common in edited works. DCDuring TALK 23:02, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

 * This is weird... When I search for "a playright" to filter out most (but not all) of the legal uses, I get 0.5% of the hits for "a playwright" on the web (~548,000:~2,500).  But when I switch to Google Books, "a playright" jumps to 9% (5,420:504).  Forcing the issue  brings this down to 374, or 6.9%, which is still astronomical. Only a small fraction of those seem to be legal uses; scannos don't seem to be a factor.  WTF?  Is the web suddenly better-proofread than print?  -- Visviva 02:29, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

 * I believe that all(?) Google searches for "playright" will count hits for "play right" and "playright", though only the latter are emboldened. I have taken to doing separate "playright -play-right" and "-playright play-right" searches to get what I thought I was getting with searches for "playright" and "play right" alone. I also get significantly different results for "playwright" and "playwright -play-wright". DCDuring TALK 12:28, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

 * The problem with that is that it also throws out any pages that have, for example, "play" and "right" in addition to "playright" (as will often be the case in a discussion of the legal concept).
 * Google's handling of quotes has been a little inconsistent lately, but the "+" operator seldom lets me down. If you're suspicious of the results from a simple quoted search, you can for example search for '+playright "a playright"' to make sure that all searched pages actually have the word in question, not just an approximation.  (That search actually gives me the same results as above, at this writing.) -- Visviva 14:40, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Just to make clear the effect of the search methods as I understand it:
 * "AB" yields hits of "AB" and "ABs" (and includes "'A-B'" (and perhaps ""A-B"" etc)), but emboldens only "AB"
 * "ABs" yields hits of "ABs"
 * "A-B -AB" yields hits of "A-B" "A B" (as well as "A/B" "A>B", etc) without AB on the same page.
 * "AB -A-B" yields hits of "AB" without "A-B", "A B", and their fellow travelers on the same page.
 * I have not examined all of the possibilities raised.
 * Because I haven't yet found documentation of this, I suspect that Google is:
 * not committed to keeping it working just this way and in every search domain;
 * not desirous of providing much evidence to SEOers who game their system; or
 * not desirous of facilitating searches that are more resource-intensive. DCDuring TALK 12:21, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

 * Also "a+playright" gives me many times more hits than "a-playright", which gives the same as ""a playright"". DCDuring TALK 12:32, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

 * On the digression which generated the methodological subdigression, I get 880K web hits and 5500 bgc hits for "a-playright"; 596K (66%) web hits and 536 (10%) bgc hits for "a-playwright", more in line with expectations. DCDuring TALK 12:32, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Kept.   —msh210  ℠  00:46, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:playright


text:
felezési idő

Etymology
, from, from , from.

Noun

 * 1)  half-life

Declension

 * For the noun, see.
 * The adjective remains unchanged.

title: felezési idő


text:
hidhërohem

Verb

 * 1) to get sad

title: hidhërohem


text: howdunits

title: howdunits


text: whydunits

title: whydunits


text: whydunnit

title: whydunnit


text: howdunnit

title: howdunnit


text: whydunnits

title: whydunnits


text:
cronopatologia

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) chronopathology

title: cronopatologia


text: howdunnits

title: howdunnits


text: hearies

title: hearies


text:
areogramma

Noun

 * 1) histogram

title: areogramma


text:
areole

Etymology
Borrowed from, from : a small area. .

Noun

 * 1)  The smallest enclosures created by the veins of a leaf.
 * 2)  Bump on a cactus out of which grow clusters of spines.
 * 3)  A tessellation in the thallus of certain lichens.
 * 4)  An areola.

Translations

 * Lithuanian: areolė
 * Portuguese:

title: areole


text:
areolare

Adjective

 * 1) areolar

title: areolare


text: Արայիկ

title: Արայիկ


text: Արո

title: Արո


text:
ladung

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) excuse (+ genitive for something)
 * 2) apology (+ genitive for something)
 * 3) exculpation or defense (+ genitive against an accusation)

title: ladung


text: collective investment schemes

title: collective investment schemes


text:
areolato

Adjective

 * 1) areolate

title: areolato


text:
Talk:Zephyr

Zephyr
RfD of two senses: If we accept these, then præsumably we shall also have to accept many of the other senses catalogued by Wikipedia. †  ﴾(u):Raifʻhār (t):Doremítzwr﴿ 00:57, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) A motor car made (some time ago) by Ford in the United Kingdom.
 * Keep, we have Honda, Ford, Toyota, Fiat, Mini, Mini Cooper, Jag, VW, Vauxhall, Chevy, even 98 Oldsmobile. There's plenty of others. --Dmol 01:42, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
 * "Otherstuff" doesn't apply - we have a very specific CFI for brand names. bd2412 T 22:08, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) A small town in India.

 * Move to RfV. DCDuring TALK 01:57, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

 * Agreed, RfV. bd2412 T 22:08, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

 * RFV the first and delete the second along with any other "small town" definitions that aren't significant for reasons of etymology. 63.95.64.254 00:55, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

 * Moved to RFV. Equinox ◑ 00:41, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Request for verification
[Psst, it is only I. The following comments are from the WT:RFD discussion, where the consensus was to move here to RFV.] Equinox ◑ 00:42, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

RfD of two senses: If we accept these, then præsumably we shall also have to accept many of the other senses catalogued by Wikipedia. †  ﴾(u):Raifʻhār (t):Doremítzwr﴿ 00:57, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) A motor car made (some time ago) by Ford in the United Kingdom.
 * Keep, we have Honda, Ford, Toyota, Fiat, Mini, Mini Cooper, Jag, VW, Vauxhall, Chevy, even 98 Oldsmobile. There's plenty of others. --Dmol 01:42, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
 * "Otherstuff" doesn't apply - we have a very specific CFI for brand names. bd2412 T 22:08, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) A small town in India.

 * Move to RfV. DCDuring TALK 01:57, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

 * Agreed, RfV. bd2412 T 22:08, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

 * RFV the first and delete the second along with any other "small town" definitions that aren't significant for reasons of etymology. 63.95.64.254 00:55, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

What’s the current policy on terms like this automobile sense now? †  ﴾(u):Raifʻhār (t):Doremítzwr﴿ 19:32, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Find three citations by different authors spanning three years showing use of the word in the abstract (e.i., not indicating in text that it is an automobile), which indicates that people hear the word and think of the car, without being told it's a car. bd2412 T 04:21, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

RFV failed, sense removed. —Ruakh TALK 16:05, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:Zephyr


text:
lafor

Noun

 * 1) leopard

title: lafor


text:
areometria

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) areometry

Noun

 * 1)  areometry measurement of the specific gravity of liquids

title: areometria


text: Category:Italian terms prefixed with areo-


text:
Talk:treknobabble

treknobabble
This seems to fall foul of the Fictional universes exclusion to me, as does treknology below. Delete and maybe add to a new Appendix:Star Trek. — Carolina wren discussió 18:03, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

 * No, it doesn't. The word is never used in that fictional universe.  Think of it this way: the character Mr. Spock would never use the word "treknobabble". --EncycloPetey 19:32, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

 * Careful. That's not true. The citations must be (I quote) "independent of reference to that universe" — not merely spoken by non-characters of the universe. Equinox ◑ 22:06, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

 * I think that EncycloPetey is right, and that you're misunderstanding his argument. The relevant sentence is this one:
 * Terms A→originating in fictional universes←A which have three citations in separate works, but B→which do not have three citations which are independent of reference to that universe←B may be included only in appendices of words from that universe, and not in the main dictionary space. [emphasis removed]
 * EP is saying that (non-finite) clause A doesn't describe treknobabble: (since it doesn't originate in the Star Trek universe, but rather is an external reference to Star Trek itself), such that that entire section of the CFI doesn't apply. You are saying that clause B does, or may, describe treknobabble:. But since clause A doesn't, clause B is irrelevant. Do you see what I mean?
 * —Ruakh TALK 14:59, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

 * Yes, that explains my argument in a more detailed way. We had a similar discussion over X-Phile:, which is another term pertaining to a particular TV program, but not originating within that fictional universe.  You can see Robert's opinion in the matter at Talk:X-Phile. --EncycloPetey 17:51, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

 * Keep per EncycloPetey. Exactly correct analysis. We're not talking about a tricorder or a lightsaber here. bd2412 T 17:30, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Move to RFV and keep if cited as normal. Ƿidsiþ 18:02, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 * For the record, it's now cited (so far as the usual CFI requires). bd2412 T 19:58, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Kept. Also, preëmptively RFV-passed. (Thanks for the cites, BD2412!) —Ruakh TALK 13:54, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:treknobabble


text:
areometry

Noun

 * 1) The study of the measurement of specific gravity of liquids.

Translations

 * Italian: areometria
 * Portuguese: areometria

title: areometry


text:
areometro

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  areometer

title: areometro


text:
areometer

Noun

 * 1) Any device used to measure the specific gravity of liquids or the density of solids.

Translations

 * Arabic: مِكْثَاف, مِقْيَاس ثِقْل السَائِل النَوْعِيّ, مِقْيَاس الثِقْل النَوْعِيّ, مِقْيَاس كَثَافَة السَائِل
 * Catalan: areòmetre
 * Chinese:
 * Mandarin:
 * Finnish: ,
 * French:
 * German:, Prüfspindel
 * Greek:
 * Italian: areometro
 * Malay: areometer
 * Polish:
 * Portuguese: areómetro, areômetro
 * Russian:
 * Spanish: areómetro
 * Swedish:

Noun

 * 1) an

title: areometer


text:
User talk:91.104.62.217

earth
It's not inconsistent. The lower-case variant is at earth, and the capitalized one is at Earth. The proper noun is not always capitalized in practice, even through grammars say that is the preferred form for the name of the planet. We also have sun and Sun, moon and Moon. Each documentable spelling and capitalization variant gets an entry to show how it is used. --EncycloPetey 21:47, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

title: User talk:91.104.62.217


text: mélyhegedűk

title: mélyhegedűk


text:
Talk:marsupial

marsupial
Adjective: of, or pertaining to a marsupial. Isn't this just a regular attributive adjective? We don't accept these, right (although there are some translations thereunder which could be worth a keep) --Jackofclubs 13:45, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

 * It has a limited amount of use as a true adjective. Consider the following cases, respectively, of gradable, comparative, and predicate use:

DCDuring TALK 16:18, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

 * Great. Maybe there should be a(nother) definition as having a pouch or similar. --Jackofclubs 06:18, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Would that be the attributive use of the noun sense, as in marsupial mouse? Beats me whether we are supposed to include that as an adjective sense. —Michael Z. 2009-04-23 14:49 z

 * The reason I troubled to find and provide the particular citations above is that predicate, graded, and comparative use are three markers of true adjectivity. (BTW, I am not sure that the usage in the "more" quote is comparative, though certainly graded.) DCDuring TALK 16:08, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Good info. This kind of thing should be recommended in WT:ELE, or in subguidelines for particular POS headings. —Michael Z. 2009-04-23 16:53 z

RFD passed, since everyone seems to accept DCDuring's cites as demonstrating adjectivality. :-)  —Ruakh TALK 01:36, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:marsupial


text:
areopago

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) Areopagus

title: areopago


text:
dêrmei

Conjunction

 * 1) therewith, with that

title: dêrmei


text:
Areopagus

Etymology
From, which in classical times functioned as the high Court of Appeal for criminal and civil cases in Athens.

Proper noun

 * 1)  The supreme judicial and legislative council of ancient Athens.
 * 2) A prominent rock outcropping located northwest of the Acropolis in Athens, Greece.
 * 1) A prominent rock outcropping located northwest of the Acropolis in Athens, Greece.

Translations

 * Catalan: areòpag
 * Finnish:
 * Greek:
 * Ancient: Ἄρειος Πάγος
 * Irish: Cnoc Airéis
 * Italian:
 * Polish:
 * Portuguese:
 * Romanian:
 * Russian:
 * Spanish: areópago

title: Areopagus


text:
areostilo

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) araeostyle / areostyle

title: areostilo


text: menekültek

title: menekültek


text:
dantologia

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) the study of Dante, his life and works

title: dantologia


text: menetrendek

title: menetrendek


text:
dattilologia

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) dactylology

title: dattilologia


text:
defettologia

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) defectology (part of psychology that studies learning difficulties etc.)

title: defettologia


text:
úgyhogy

Conjunction

 * 1) so
 * Tanulok, úgyhogy most ne zavarj! - I'm studying so don't disturb me.

Usage notes
While is used more often for logically and essentially following implications (like rewording), úgyhogy usually indicates a consequence that does not follow that quickly or essentially (but e.g. through decision). Tehát is also more formal in some cases.

title: úgyhogy


text: mentségek

title: mentségek


text: menyétek

title: menyétek


text: unfunnier

title: unfunnier


text: unfunniest

title: unfunniest


text: mennyezetek

title: mennyezetek


text: mennyiségek

title: mennyiségek


text:
gondolkodom, tehát vagyok

Phrase

 * 1) I think therefore I am

title: gondolkodom, tehát vagyok


text:
User talk:Boobie

PS. Nice username. --Vahagn Petrosyan 22:20, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

title: User talk:Boobie


text:
gondolkodom

Verb

 * : I think, I am thinking

title: gondolkodom


text:
-nyi

Suffix

 * 1)  -ful, as much as.
 * → egy magyarországnyi terület (“an area as big as that of Hungary”, i.e. approx. an Indiana-sized area)
 * → egy magyarországnyi terület (“an area as big as that of Hungary”, i.e. approx. an Indiana-sized area)
 * → egy magyarországnyi terület (“an area as big as that of Hungary”, i.e. approx. an Indiana-sized area)

Usage notes
There are several Hungarian surnames (and eponymous street names) apparently with -nyi ending, however, they usually derive from the name of a settlement that ends in -ny, so they do not contain this suffix. Some examples are Öttevényi (from Öttevény), Herényi (from Herény), Ladányi (from Ladány), Petényi/Pethényi (from Petény). Hence, their derivation from the -nyi ending is unlikely, though possible (e.g. petényi “as big as an egg cell”, from “egg cell”).

title: -nyi


text: méretek

title: méretek


text: root canals

title: root canals


text: merevlemezek

title: merevlemezek


text:
Vespasianus

Etymology
Apparently from Vespasiae, a town near in.

Proper noun

 * 1) Vespasian Roman cognomen
 * Titus Flavius Vespasianus — The Roman emperor from AD 69 to 79, succeeded by his son Titus

title: Vespasianus


text: cariostats

title: cariostats


text: pulls teeth

title: pulls teeth


text: pulled teeth

title: pulled teeth


text:
Appendix:Variations of "ah"

The word “ah” appears in many languages with many variations in the use of capitalization, punctuation, diacritics, and in other scripts.

Capitalization and punctuation

 * ah
 * Ah
 * AH
 * aH
 * ah-
 * -ah

Diacritics

 * aĥ
 * áh
 * äh
 * ãh
 * āh
 * åh

Other scripts

 * Armenian
 * ահ

 * Hebrew
 * אה

Homophones

 * aah
 * ahh

fr:Modèle:voir/ah

title: Appendix:Variations of "ah"


text: mesék

title: mesék


text:
luontoisetu

Noun

 * 1)  benefit in kind, fringe benefit remuneration given in other than monetary form, typically on top of pay

title: luontoisetu


text: sorceror

title: sorceror


text: sorcerors

title: sorcerors


text:
sorcerously

Adverb

 * 1) In a sorcerous way; by means of sorcery.

title: sorcerously


text:
barcaza

Etymology
Augmentative of

Noun

 * 1) barge

title: barcaza


text:
fettig

Adjective

 * 1) fatty, greasy

title: fettig


text:
ndryshëm

Adjective

 * 1) different

title: ndryshëm


text:
entérite

Noun

 * 1)  enteritis (intestinal disease)

title: entérite


text:
vështirë

Etymology
A prefixed formation of ;.

Adjective

 * 1) difficult

title: vështirë


text:
lome

Etymology 1
From, from earlier , from , from. Compare.

Adverb

 * 1)  usually, commonly.

Etymology 2
From, of unknown origin.

Noun

 * 1)  A machine, device, or instrument.
 * 2) A loom; a frame used for weaving or other weaving implement.
 * 3) A container or box where fluid is stored.
 * 4)  A boat; a seafaring craft.
 * 5)  A grave; a casket.
 * 6)  An instrument of war; an armament.
 * 7)  A penis.

Adverb

 * 1) frequently, often

title: lome


text: meseországok

title: meseországok


text: points de côté

title: points de côté


text: mészárosok

title: mészárosok


text:
összerak

Verb

 * 1)  to assemble to put together

title: összerak


text:
összegyűlik

Verb

 * 1)  to assemble to gather as a group
 * 2)  to collect, to accumulate, to pile up to grow or increase in quantity or number, such as money, work

title: összegyűlik


text: metélőhagymák

title: metélőhagymák


text:
për shembull

Adverb

 * 1) for example

title: për shembull


text:
beräkning

Noun

 * 1) calculation (act or process of calculating)

title: beräkning


text:
hesaplama

Noun

 * 1) calculation (act or process of calculating)

title: hesaplama


text:
betegnelse

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) name, appellation, designation
 * 2) term
 * 3) symbol

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) designation, name, term

title: betegnelse


text: mezőgazdák

title: mezőgazdák


text: mezőgazdászok

title: mezőgazdászok


text:
theatreland

Alternative forms

 * theaterland

Noun

 * 1) Part of the West End district of London, England, where many theatres can be found.

title: theatreland


text:
შპრიცი

Etymology
From, from , from.

Noun

 * 1) syringe

title: შპრიცი


text:
schwätzen

Etymology
From, , akin to 🇨🇬. Cognate with 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1) to chat, talk, babble, prate
 * 2)  to speak, talk
 * 1)  to speak, talk
 * 1)  to speak, talk

Usage notes

 * In southwestern Germany (Baden-Württemberg, southern Hesse, Rhineland-Palatinate, Saarland) this is a neutral, albeit somewhat informal, word for speaking.
 * Elsewhere it is more restricted and roughly interchangeable with the variant . A very loose distinction may be identified insofar as usually means chatting among a group, while  also refers to one person who talks a lot. Both may have a negative tone, especially with situations where one ought to be silent (e.g. during a school lesson as above).
 * The derivatives, belong more to , while ,  belong more to . The latter two nouns are usually not negative.

Etymology
From. Cognate with 🇨🇬,. For the past participle compare.

Verb

 * 1)  to speak
 * 2)  to speak (a language)
 * 1)  to speak (a language)

title: schwätzen


text:
babbeln

Etymology
(lautmalend) of a child's first attempts to speak, ba-ba.

Verb

 * 1) to blubber; blabber talk incoherently
 * 2) to babble to talk a lot

title: babbeln


text:
kurtedawên

Noun

 * 1) miniskirt

title: kurtedawên


text:
kurtedaw

Noun

 * 1) miniskirt

title: kurtedaw


text:
kurtetenore

Noun

 * 1) miniskirt

title: kurtetenore


text: hands over

title: hands over


text: handing over

title: handing over


text:
diacritique

Etymology 1
.

Adjective

 * 1) diacritical

Etymology 2
.

Noun

 * 1) diacritic (special mark)

Noun

 * 1) diacritics

title: diacritique


text:
weasel clause

Noun

 * 1)  An escape clause; a clause in a legal contract permitting one of the parties to escape ("weasel out of") its obligations under some circumstances.

title: weasel clause


text:
συνεργάζομαι

Verb

 * 1) to work with, cooperate; to contribute

Pronunciation

 * Old
 * Old
 * Old

Verb

 * 1) to collaborate, to cooperate, to

Related terms
&

title: συνεργάζομαι


text:
in stride

Prepositional phrase

 * 1)  Without disturbing one's course of activities.
 * 2)  Without emotional upset.

title: in stride


text:
contradizer

Etymology
Borrowed from, from +.

Verb

 * 1) to contradict (deny the truth of a statement or statements)

title: contradizer