text:
nonengineered

Adjective

 * 1) Not engineered; traditional, natural, or organic.

title: nonengineered


text:
forwardable

Adjective

 * 1) That can be forwarded.

Translations

 * Dutch: doorstuurbaar

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: forwardable


text:
midthought

Noun

 * 1) Some time during a thought.

Adverb

 * 1) During a thought; in midthought.

title: midthought


text:
manelessness

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) The state of being maneless.

title: manelessness


text:
emblaze

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  To kindle; set ablaze.
 * 2)  To adorn with glittering embellishments; cause to glitter or shine.
 * 3)  To illuminate; to etch or display in a bright, fiery way; blazon.
 * 4) * 1997, Delerium (band), Euphoria (Firefly) (song)
 * This feeling emblazed inside. / Every nerve like a firefly.
 * This feeling emblazed inside. / Every nerve like a firefly.

title: emblaze


text: emblazes

title: emblazes


text: emblazing

title: emblazing


text: emblazed

title: emblazed


text:
postvictory

Adjective

 * 1) Occurring after a victory.

title: postvictory


text:
unimpeachability

Noun

 * 1) The state or condition of being unimpeachable; blamelessness.

title: unimpeachability


text:
impeachability

Noun

 * 1) The state or condition of being impeachable.

title: impeachability


text:
baldish

Adjective

 * 1) Somewhat bald; balding.

Translations

 * Finnish: kaljuhko
 * Polish:

title: baldish


text:
belovedness

Noun

 * 1) The state or condition of being beloved.

Translations

 * Dutch: geliefdheid

title: belovedness


text:
cabinlike

Adjective

 * 1) Resembling or characteristic of a cabin.

title: cabinlike


text:
divadom

Noun

 * 1) The condition of being a diva; the sphere of divas.

title: divadom


text:
lunkish

Adjective

 * 1) Like a lunk; stupid, foolish.

title: lunkish


text: maqamat

title: maqamat


text:
nonmale

Adjective

 * 1) Not male.

Noun

 * 1) One who is not male.

title: nonmale


text:
objectlike

Adjective

 * 1) Resembling an object.

title: objectlike


text:
panleukopenia

Noun

 * 1) A distemper of cats caused by a strain of.

Translations

 * Finnish: kissarutto
 * Polish: panleukopenia kotów, nosówka kotów

title: panleukopenia


text: scumblings

title: scumblings


text: thanka

title: thanka


text: thankas

title: thankas


text:
uncontainably

Adverb

 * 1) In an uncontainable way.

title: uncontainably


text:
chacarera

Noun

 * 1)  A genre of Argentinian and Bolivian folk music, a dance form played by contemporary musicians as soloists or in small ensembles of voice, guitar, violin and bombo drum.
 * 2)  A dance accompanying this music.
 * 1)  A dance accompanying this music.

title: chacarera


text: chacareras

title: chacareras


text:
insulinlike

Adjective

 * 1) Resembling insulin or some aspect of it.

title: insulinlike


text:
restraint of trade

Noun

 * 1)  An agreement that prevents fair competition on the open market, such as an agreement by one party to hire a second party to work within a profession on the condition that the second party will not compete against the first.

title: restraint of trade


text:
missort

Verb

 * 1)  To sort incorrectly; to misorder.

Noun

 * 1) An incorrect sorting.
 * 2) Something incorrectly sorted.

title: missort


text: missorting

title: missorting


text: restraints of trade

title: restraints of trade


text: missorted

title: missorted


text: missorts

title: missorts


text: strangulates

title: strangulates


text: strangulating

title: strangulating


text:
strangulated

Adjective

 * 1)  Having the circulation stopped by compression; attended with arrest or obstruction of circulation, caused by constriction or compression.
 * a strangulated hernia
 * 1) Strangled; affected by strangulation.
 * 2)  Contracted at irregular intervals, if tied with a ligature; constricted.
 * 1)  Contracted at irregular intervals, if tied with a ligature; constricted.

title: strangulated


text:
superbrand

Noun

 * 1) An extremely popular brand.

title: superbrand


text: superbrands

title: superbrands


text:
superconnected

Adjective

 * 1)  Whose every minimum vertex cut leads to isolated vertices.
 * 2)  Being a major user of communication technologies.
 * 1)  Being a major user of communication technologies.

title: superconnected


text:
unflooded

Adjective

 * 1) Not flooded.

title: unflooded


text:
uninundated

Adjective

 * 1) Not inundated.

title: uninundated


text:
aromatherapeutic

Adjective

 * 1)  Of or pertaining to aromatherapy

Translations

 * Italian: aromaterapico
 * Polish:
 * Portuguese: aromaterapêutico, aromaterápico

title: aromatherapeutic


text:
passing off

Noun

 * 1)  The act of misrepresenting the origin of a product.

title: passing off


text:
Template talk:ru-noun-ь-3-m

Plural forms
Is флигель a good representative of this type or is it irregular? I ask because флигель doesn’t have -ь- in the plural. Is the -ь- usual for these plurals? —Stephen 02:47, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
 * флигель is regular, there should not have been -ь- at all. I must have added -ь- for князь, which, in fact, is irregular. --Vahagn Petrosyan 11:22, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

title: Template talk:ru-noun-ь-3-m


text: guerri

title: guerri


text:
integrity

Etymology
Borrowed from, from , from. .

Noun

 * 1) Steadfast adherence to a strict moral or ethical code.
 * 2) The state of being wholesome; unimpaired
 * 3) The quality or condition of being complete; pure
 * 4)  With regards to data encryption, ensuring that information is not altered by unauthorized persons in a way that is not detectable by authorized users.
 * 5)  The ability of systems to provide timely warnings to users when they should not be used for navigation.
 * 6) Trustworthiness; keeping one's word.
 * 1)  The ability of systems to provide timely warnings to users when they should not be used for navigation.
 * 2) Trustworthiness; keeping one's word.

Translations

 * Albanian:
 * Arabic: أَمَانَة, نَزَاهَة
 * Belarusian: сумле́ннасць
 * Bulgarian: ,
 * Catalan:
 * Cebuano: integridad
 * Chinese:
 * Mandarin:
 * Czech: ,
 * Finnish:, ,
 * German:
 * Irish: ionracas
 * Italian:
 * Latin: honestās, integritas
 * Malay: kejujuran, integriti
 * Maori: ngākau tapatahi
 * Middle English: honeste
 * Polish: ,
 * Portuguese:
 * Romanian:
 * Russian:
 * Serbo-Croatian:
 * Cyrillic: интегрѝте̄т, чѐстито̄ст
 * Roman: ,
 * Spanish:
 * Swahili:
 * Swedish:
 * Tagalog: integridad
 * Ukrainian: че́сність

 * Arabic: سَلَامَة
 * Belarusian: цэ́ласнасць
 * Bulgarian: ,
 * Catalan:
 * Chinese:
 * Mandarin:
 * Czech: ,
 * Finnish:, ,
 * German:
 * Hungarian:
 * Italian:
 * Latin: integritās
 * Portuguese:
 * Russian:
 * Serbo-Croatian:
 * Cyrillic: цјело̀вито̄ст
 * Roman:
 * Swahili:
 * Ukrainian:

 * Arabic: سَلَامَة
 * Bulgarian:
 * Catalan: enteresa
 * Cebuano: lunsay
 * Chinese:
 * Mandarin:
 * Finnish:
 * German:
 * Italian:
 * Latin: integritās, pūritās
 * Portuguese:
 * Russian:
 * Swahili:
 * Ukrainian:

title: integrity


text:
грбовник

Noun

 * 1)  armorial, roll of arms

title: грбовник


text: Category:mk:History

title: Category:mk:History


text:
Talk:aquel

Is 'aquel' really an adjective? If so, it would be nice to see it used in a sentence that way. Thanks for any help.

aquel vs. ese
What is the difference between aquel and ese in Spanish ? They seem to both mean "that". Aquel carro or ese carro?? --67.217.0.108 19:23, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Does it possibly have anything to do with distance? --67.217.0.108 15:37, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

title: Talk:aquel


text:
User:Hippietrail/nearbypages.js

function WiktNearby { this.alwaysLeftToRight = getCookie('WiktNearbyAlwaysLTR') == "true"; this.counter = 0; this.pending = 0;

// helper functions function namespaceName { if (wgNamespaceNumber == 0) return ""; return wgPageName.replace(":" + wgTitle.replace(/ /g, "_"), ""); }

function mwEncodeURIComponent(term) { return encodeURIComponent(term).replace(/%2F/g, "/"); }

this.makeHeadingLink = function (term, langname, tagName) { var ele = document.createElement(tagName); if (tagName == "a") { var href = "/wiki/"; if (wgNamespaceNumber != 0) href += namespaceName + ":"; href += mwEncodeURIComponent(term); if (/^[^\*_]/.test(langname)) href += "#" + langname; ele.href = href; }   if (this.alwaysLeftToRight) term = "\u200e" + term; ele.appendChild(document.createTextNode(term)); return ele; }

this.doHeadings = function(nearby) { var arrows = ["«", "»"];

// point to toward a and z or always point toward z?   var larr = Math.floor(Math.random*2);

var bc = document.getElementById("bodyContent"); var h2s = bc.getElementsByTagName("h2");

outer: for (var i = 0; i < h2s.length; ++i) { var spans = h2s[i].getElementsByTagName("span"); inner: for (var j = 0; j < spans.length; ++j) { if (spans[j].className == "mw-headline") { langname = spans[j].textContent || spans[j].innerText; if (nearby.langname == langname) { // add in reverse order since we use insertBefore var div = document.createElement("div"); div.className = "nearby-pages"; div.title = "Alphabetical order"; var bold = document.createElement("b"); bold.appendChild(document.createTextNode("Nearby: ")); div.appendChild(bold); if ("prev" in nearby) { for (k = 0; k < nearby.prev.length; ++k) { div.appendChild(this.makeHeadingLink(nearby.prev[k], nearby.langname, "a")); div.appendChild(document.createTextNode("\xa0" + arrows[larr] + " ")); }           }            div.appendChild(document.createTextNode(" ")); div.appendChild(this.makeHeadingLink(wgTitle, nearby.langname, "b")); div.appendChild(document.createTextNode(" ")); if ("next" in nearby) { for (k = 0; k < nearby.next.length; ++k) { div.appendChild(document.createTextNode(" " + arrows[1] + "\u00a0")); div.appendChild(this.makeHeadingLink(nearby.next[k], nearby.langname, "a")); }           }            h2s[i].parentNode.insertBefore(div, h2s[i].nextSibling); }       }      }    }  }

this.doNavBar = function(nearby) { var terms = []; var mid = 0;

if ("prev" in nearby) { for (i = 0 ; i < nearby.prev.length; ++i) terms.push(nearby.prev[i]); mid = nearby.prev.length; }     terms.push(nearby.inputterm); if ("next" in nearby) { for (i = 0 ; i < nearby.next.length; ++i) terms.push(nearby.next[i]); }     // language name or namespace name or "browse" var heading; var is_language = false; if (nearby.langname.substr(0,1) == "_") { heading = nearby.langname.substr(1); } else if (nearby.langname == "*") { heading = "Browse"; } else { heading = nearby.langname; is_language = true; }

// create a portlet var navPortlet = document.getElementById("p-navigation"); if (!navPortlet) return;

var nearbyWrapper = document.getElementById("p-nearby");

if (!nearbyWrapper) { nearbyWrapper = document.createElement("div"); nearbyWrapper.id = "p-nearby"; navPortlet.parentNode.insertBefore(nearbyWrapper, navPortlet.nextSibling); }

var portlet = document.createElement('div'); portlet.className = skin == "vector" ? "portal" : "portlet"; var num = "seq" in nearby ? nearby.seq : this.counter; this.counter++; portlet.id = 'p-nearby-' + num;

// find the right place to add this language var beforeHere = null; var portlets = nearbyWrapper.getElementsByTagName("div"); for (var i = 0; i < portlets.length; i++) { if (portlets[i].id.substr(9) > num) { beforeHere = portlets[i]; break; }     }

if (beforeHere) nearbyWrapper.insertBefore(portlet, beforeHere); else nearbyWrapper.appendChild(portlet);

var ph5 = document.createElement('h5'); ph5.setAttribute('lang','en'); ph5.setAttribute('xml:lang','en'); portlet.appendChild(ph5);

var ha = document.createElement("a"); ha.href += "#" + nearby.langname; ha.style.textDecoration = "none"; ph5.appendChild(ha);

ha.appendChild(document.createTextNode(heading));

var pBody = document.createElement('div'); pBody.className = skin == "vector" ? "body" : "pBody"; portlet.appendChild(pBody);

var pul = document.createElement('ul'); pBody.appendChild(pul);

// add link to portlet for (var i=0; i<terms.length; i++) { var pli = document.createElement('li'); pul.appendChild(pli);

var pla = document.createElement('a'); var href = "/wiki/"; if (wgNamespaceNumber != 0) href += namespaceName + ":"; href += mwEncodeURIComponent(terms[i]); if (is_language) href += "#" + nearby.langname; pla.href = href;

if (i == mid) { if (nearby.exists) pla.style.fontWeight = "bold"; else pla.style.color = "#ba0000"; }       pli.appendChild(pla);

pla.appendChild(document.createTextNode(terms[i])); } }

// toolserver has sent back results. add them to the page this.callback = function(nearby) { // we will always give up if there's an error in the json response if ("error" in nearby) return;

// in the future we may handle multiple languages per request if (!"langname" in nearby) return;

var doHeadings = getCookie('WiktNearbyPagesLangHeadings') == "true"; var doNavBar = getCookie('WiktNearbyPagesNavbar') == "true";

// since these options are new they default to off // so having nearbypages enabled with both options off means the old behaviour // which means display both if (doHeadings == false && doNavBar == false) doHeadings = doNavBar = true;

if (doHeadings) this.doHeadings(nearby);

if (doNavBar) this.doNavBar(nearby);

--this.pending; }

// entry point this.execute = function { var bc = document.getElementById("bodyContent"); var langname;

// article = page = entries if (wgNamespaceNumber == 0) { // redirect var cs = document.getElementById("contentSub"); cs = cs.textContent || cs.innerText; if (cs == "Redirect page") { ++this.pending; query("_Redirect", wgTitle);

// normal article = page = entries } else { var h2s = bc.getElementsByTagName("h2"); var nolangs = true;

var n = 1; outer: for (var i = 0; i < h2s.length; ++i) { var spans = h2s[i].getElementsByTagName("span"); inner: for (var j = 0; j < spans.length; ++j) { if (spans[j].className == "mw-headline") { ++this.pending; query(spans[j].textContent || spans[j].innerText, wgTitle, n++); nolangs = false; }         }        }        // normal article = page with no language headings // this is usually while editing or viewing a redlink if (nolangs) { // re-enabled with new implementation ++this.pending; query("*", wgTitle); }     }    // other namespace } else { ++this.pending; query("_" + namespaceName, wgTitle); }

function query(lang, term, seq) { mw.loader.load(       "http://toolserver.org/~hippietrail/nearbypages.fcgi?"        + "langname=" + lang + "&term=" + term + "&num=4"        + (seq ? "&seq=" + seq : "")       + "&callback=wiktNearby.callback"); } } }

// we need a globally visible JSONP callback var wiktNearby;

$(function {  wiktNearby = new WiktNearby;  wiktNearby.execute; })

title: User:Hippietrail/nearbypages.js


text:
atalayar

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to watch from a high vantage point
 * 2)  to spy on

title: atalayar


text:
aḍḍumari

Etymology
Probably from (as was 🇨🇬), from.

Verb

 * 1)  to light up, to ignite, to kindle a fire
 * 2)  to turn on an electric device etc.
 * 1)  to turn on an electric device etc.

title: aḍḍumari


text:
astutari

Etymology
From, from.

Verb

 * 1)  to put out, to extinguish a fire
 * 2)  to turn off an electric device etc.
 * 1)  to turn off an electric device etc.

title: astutari


text:
focu

Etymology
From, of uncertain origin. Cognates include 🇨🇬 and 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) fire
 * 2) family
 * 3) household
 * 4) blast, fire

Etymology
From. Compare 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) fire

title: focu


text:
ventu

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) wind

Etymology
From, from.

Noun

 * 1)  wind

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) wind

title: ventu


text:
хералд

Noun

 * 1)  herald

title: хералд


text:
ciamma

Etymology
From. Compare 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) flame

title: ciamma


text:
ziu

Etymology
From, from. Compare 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬 or.

Noun
(feminine zia)

 * 1) uncle
 * 2) elder male person, not strictly a relative

title: ziu


text: Category:tr:Seasons

title: Category:tr:Seasons


text:
pinacocyte

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  Any of a group of flattened polygonal cells that together make up the pinacoderm in the dermal epithelium of sponges.

Derived terms

 * cell which adheres to the surface to which the sponge attaches
 * cell on the inner surface of a canal of the sponge
 * cell on the exterior surface of the sponge
 * pinacocytic

title: pinacocyte


text:
svagatezza

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) absent-mindedness

title: svagatezza


text:
svagataggine

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) absent-mindedness

title: svagataggine


text:
Talk:family

Request for deletion
Seems to be an attributive use of the noun. --Dan Polansky 15:10, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) rfd-sense: adjective - Related to the family.
 * The dog was kept as a family pet.
 * For Apocynaceae, this type of flower is a family characteristic.

 * Move to RfV. The usage examples are consistent with attributive use. But I think that this forms a true comparative and therefore should be presented as an adjective too. It would be worth citing as adjective. DCDuring TALK 15:51, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand definition, but delete these cites. Family has a meaning of having traditional values, being conservative, even old fashioned - for example "family values".   The examples are clearly wrong, and are attributive uses of the noun.--Dmol 09:55, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

 * Moved to RFV. Equinox ◑ 00:52, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Request for verification
Moved here from RFD per consensus: see WT:RFD. Equinox ◑ 00:54, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

 * (Comment moved from RFD) Keep and expand definition, but delete these cites. Family has a meaning of having traditional values, being conservative, even old fashioned - for example "family values". The examples are clearly wrong, and are attributive uses of the noun.--Dmol 09:00, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

 * I have inserted two senses with usexes that illustrate the additional meanings that would justify keeping the adjective PoS. I would argue that both have widespread use in the US. The value of the RfVed sense is to remind users that some meanings are limited to attributive use of senses that are the noun's. If there is agreement as to the widespread use and the suitability of the usage examples, this matter can be closed forthwith. DCDuring TALK 10:56, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Striking: I've moved this sense up to the ===Noun=== section. Thanks for your new senses, DCDuring. —Ruakh TALK 05:48, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Question
Is meaning 7, "(uncountable) Collectively, people who are members of one's intimate social group. They treated me like family." really a meaning for "family"? Or is it really about the expression "like family"?Redddogg 02:09, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
 * It's a meaning of the word "family", because you can say "they treated me as family", or "they made me feel like one of the family", or "I was soon part of the family", all with the same meaning. Also, in "like family" the "like" is no different to the "like" in collocations like "they treated me like dirt", "I was treated like royalty", "they made me feel like I was a child", etc. Thryduulf (talk) 10:14, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Hmmm. Interesting. You could be right. I still feel these are non-literal uses of the word "family." I think in any of these cases if you asked the person if he was a member of the family in question he would say no, despite using an expression that if taken literally would say he was.Redddogg 05:01, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
 * If you asked someone if they were a member of the family, then they would almost certainly assume you meant senses 1 or 2 of "family", unless there was other context, and that other context is not limited to using the construction "like family" (e.g. "like one of the family", "as part of the family", "as if you're family", "basically family", "might as well be family", etc.). Just because it's not a literal sense of "family" doesn't mean it can't be non-literal sense of the same word. Thryduulf (talk) 09:07, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I still don't think there is a different sense of the word to mean "relatives and close friends." Any more than if you said someone was "as pale as a ghost."  No one would think he was dead. Redddogg 10:30, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
 * But you do find use of the word family in the other sense we have, 6. A group of people similar to one related by blood, marriage, law, or custom. Our company is one big happy family. E.g., , . So I think the best thing here would be just to combine these two senses into one:  A group of people similar to one related by blood, marriage, law, or custom, with both example sentences. What do y'all think? —msh210℠ (talk) 10:44, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I hadn't considered that sense, but now I look at it combining them would make sense. Thryduulf (talk)
 * I think some combining would be good, however you want to do it. It seems like part of the problem is the word itself is a bit vague and can expand and contract its meaning depending on the circumstances.Redddogg 14:08, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

Casey Jones usage
Which definition would best correspond (or do we need to add...) to CJ's rant against the foot clan in the TMNT film? It feels like uncountable since he doesn't use an article like a/the. "You call this family? This here, or that over there, family?"

Similar would be expressions like "he is family" as opposed to "part of the family". Is this adjective? Does not take form like "familial" so not sure, confusing. 64.228.90.129 20:49, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

 * Not a separate definition. Perhaps a usage note? Equinox ◑ 20:53, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Some other examples:
 * "Yeah that's right man, he's family, he's blood" in Oliver and Company
 * "because I told Bee I'd say, he's family too" in transformers prime
 * "He's my family" in Gotham

all examples of term being used to refer to singular person, so we should note that it need not be 2 minimum. The 3rd use by Bruce Wayne is like "he's my entire family" while the first 2 indicate a member so the possessive article versus no article are different though.

It clearly doesn't mean the entire group but possibly just a portion of it.

If we had a family member page, the usage may match this, seems to resemble how kin is used. 64.228.90.129 21:15, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

regarding "the chair is wood" in that case shouldn't we mention that "wood" is sometimes used as an adjective where "wooden" is more appropriate? These deserve mentions if it is common to use the root term in place of its adjective form. 64.228.90.129 21:28, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Japanese use
Jason Ozuma repeatedly uses "family" in the "Black Boxer" arc of Hajime no Ippo, mixed in with Japanese, would this qualify the language for a heading? 64.228.90.129 21:47, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Also template
The usage on this page seems to be inconsistent with other pages.

Template:also says: "This template links to similar entries, especially those that differ only in capitalization, diacritics, or punctuation."

Take the page ice for example. Its links:
 * Ice
 * ICE
 * icé
 * íce
 * ìce
 * -ice
 * Ice.
 * Appendix:Variations of "ice"

Meanwhile, this page links to:
 * Thesaurus:class
 * nuclear family
 * immediate family
 * extended family

…which seem more like they should go under "Derived terms", "Related terms", and the separate "See also" section.

--Brian

 * (, who made —suzukaze (t・c) 02:48, 21 December 2017 (UTC))
 * I automatically combine multiple invocations of the template on one page since there are bots that add inflected forms with the template in the middle of the page. The template should only link to pages that differ in capitalization, diacritics, or punctuation, but I do not test for this. DTLHS (talk) 03:13, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

RFD discussion: October–December 2021
RFD existing noun sense 11, "Used attributively". Usexes are "family pet", meaning "pet belonging to a family", and "family characteristic", meaning "characteristic of a family", which are routinely predictable attributive uses of general noun senses and do not need mentioning separately. The third example, "family album", could have its own entry if deemed non-obvious from parts.

See also Tea_room/2021/October and family (2) below.

 * Delete. There should never be a noun sense that is the same as another one except for attributivity. Simply put "often attributive" on the original sense if worth noting. Equinox ◑ 10:17, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. A family pet usually belongs to sense 4 ("especially if they live or work together") as family pets are usually not shared between households.  Vox Sciurorum (talk) 20:20, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

 * Sense 11 doesn't try to distinguish application to any particular sense, it just highlights that family is often used attributively. I have no objection to that. DonnanZ (talk) 09:34, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

 * RFD-deleted. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 04:37, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

family restaurant
I want to put "family restaurant" as a usex but I'm not sure where it should go. None Shall Revert (talk) 11:25, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

RFD discussion: October 2021–January 2023
RFD two adjective senses:

 * 1) Suitable for children and adults.
 * 2) Conservative, traditional.
 * 1) Conservative, traditional.
 * 1) Conservative, traditional.

These are attributive uses of the noun, not true adjectives (and btw the fact that one might be able to say "a very/more family restaurant" is not conclusive since e.g. one can equally say "a very New York expression" or "a more New York way to dress", and hopefully we are not going to allow an adjective sense of "New York").

However, if these attributive uses are deemed non-obvious from the general noun senses, they can be moved to an "attributive use" sense of the noun and defined there.

See also Tea_room/2021/October and family (1) above.

 * Note we have . Equinox ◑ 10:16, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

 * Lexico does include family as an adjective, with the sense "Designed to be suitable for children as well as adults." DonnanZ (talk) 09:12, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

 * Sense 1 is more plausible than sense 2, for which the only usex is not actually a usex of family but of family values, which as Equinox points out is a different entry, so delete sense 2. - -sche (discuss) 16:42, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Keep sense 1. That is not an attributive use of the noun. The Borgias is a family show in the attributive-noun sense. It’s not a family show in this sense. Conversely, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monsters,%20Inc. Monsters, Inc.] is a family show in this sense but not in the attributive-noun sense. Lereman (talk) 00:30, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Keep sense 1 per Lereman’s argument above. I don’t have any clear view on sense 2, family is non-attributive there too, to suggest otherwise is to claim that non-traditional families don’t exist but as this meaning of family doesn’t seem to exist outside of the set phrase family values then I’m leaning towards Delete. Overlordnat1 (talk) 01:12, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

 * Well, there's nothing to say that there can't be more than one attributive sense: one is for families and the other is about families, but the noun is the same. Likewise, one of the few things that "woman hater" (female bigot) and "woman-hater" (misogynist) have in common is that both use "woman" as an attributive noun. Chuck Entz (talk) 05:14, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

 * Upon deeper reflection and after looking at our family entry more closely, I think we should Delete adjective sense 1, as the same phrase family restaurant appears in noun sense 1 where an example of attributive use is given anyway. I think we should have another noun definition along the lines of ‘an immediate family consisting of a child or children and their married and cohabiting parents of opposite sex; a nuclear family’ and then not only could we move the usex about ‘family values’ there but we could include a usex or quote about the importance of the ‘family unit’. On that basis, I now say Delete both challenged adjective senses. Overlordnat1 (talk) 13:17, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
 * I’ve just added a noun definition consistent with the meaning of nuclear family, copied the usex to there and added another one mentioning the ‘family unit’. Ideally I’d add some non-attributive uses of this sense but it’s hard to provide quotes that unambiguously use the word this way. There is, however, the Conservative American organisation ‘Focus on the Family’  which is clearly mainly concerned with nuclear families. Overlordnat1 (talk) 11:07, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

 * Sense 2 deleted. Sense 1 remains to be resolved. I say delete it too, like Overlordnat and others (as it's the noun, attributively). - -sche (discuss) 18:47, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

 * Keep sense 1 (suitable for children and adults) per WT:LEMMING: in MW, dictionary.com, oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com, Macmillan. And without that, "family film" could be a film featuring family; it is not clear that it means suitable for the whole family, both children and adults. --Dan Polansky (talk) 17:54, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep sense 1 on the basis of Lexico/Oxford Dictionary of English, 2005 edition. I commented before without voting. It's high time this was wrapped up. DonnanZ (talk) 19:21, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
 * The ratio of Keeps to Deletes is 3:3 and this has been discussed for long enough, so RFD-Kept. --Overlordnat1 (talk) 01:31, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
 * (3:3, the nominator should be taken into account as well . —Al-Muqanna المقنع (talk) 01:47, 18 January 2023 (UTC))
 * Fixed. --Overlordnat1 (talk) 07:26, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:family


text:
stentatezza

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) difficulty
 * 2) poverty

title: stentatezza


text: hondelijn

title: hondelijn


text:
Talk:Martian

Martian
Anyone heard of this computing sense (something like "incompatible")? There's nothing very prominent on Google, and for a techy term I'd expect it. 86.131.86.108 00:37, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

 * Deleted. Equinox ◑ 22:18, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:Martian


text:
splendidezza

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) brightness, shine, brilliance
 * 2) splendor, magnificence
 * 3) generosity

title: splendidezza


text:
Talk:yonkai

yokai
See oujo--50 Xylophone Players talk 16:43, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

 * I don’t understand what you’re driving at. —Stephen 17:12, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

 * Delete per nom, correctly spelled entry exists. Robert Ullmann 18:17, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

 * Keep in accordance with the discussions we’ve had and decisions we’ve made over the past few years that included some Japanese scholars and linguists. —Stephen 21:16, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
 * You don't understand what I'm driving at? What I'm driving at is that 2 words in Japanese (just presume for a second that yokai&yōkai are both (different) words) such as yokai and yōkai are often completely unrelated to one another, even though one who is unfamiliar with Hepburn might easily get them mixed up since the difference between them is just a macron and they are otherwise spelt exactly the same; see the two entries I pointed out in ojo. It would be hard enough for a person to associate the appropriate meaning with the appropriate word if they mixed up things like yokai and yōkai without them being under the delusion that those words were one and the same.--50 Xylophone Players talk 22:25, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

 * Yes, I finally figured out that that’s what you meant. We discussed this problem last year and, I think, the preceding year, and decided that the best way to handle romaji entries is like we do with Latin...that is, without macrons. Since there are usually several different senses for a given romaji entry, they are differentiated in the article using macrons in the head word and, especially, by placing the kanji, if any, at the beginning of each sense. This make Japanese more more accessible to those who don’t know how to type Japanese. —Stephen 22:38, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Discussion closed. The yōkai related definition is no longer in this entry.--50 Xylophone Players talk 11:53, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

title: Talk:yonkai


text:
զիբիլ

Etymology
From and in some dialects from, ultimately from. The Van dialect is probably borrowed via 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1)  litter, rubbish, garbage, trash
 * 2)  junk, garbage worthless, low quality thing
 * 3)  trash can, garbage can, dustbin
 * 1)  junk, garbage worthless, low quality thing
 * 2)  trash can, garbage can, dustbin
 * 1)  junk, garbage worthless, low quality thing
 * 2)  trash can, garbage can, dustbin
 * 1)  junk, garbage worthless, low quality thing
 * 2)  trash can, garbage can, dustbin
 * 1)  trash can, garbage can, dustbin

Adjective

 * 1)  worthless, of low quality, good-for-nothing

title: զիբիլ


text:
spiacevolezza

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) unpleasantness, disagreeableness

title: spiacevolezza


text:
Talk:MOB

MOB
monster or boss, a shorthand way of referring to any enemy which is computer controlled. Never heard of it. Seems a bit fishy. DCDuring TALK 11:31, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

 * MOB also means Man Over Board. Added a line for that. --Hekaheka 12:02, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

 * Deleted. Equinox ◑ 22:24, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:MOB


text:
spiacevolmente

Etymology
From.

Adverb

 * 1) unpleasantly, disagreeably

title: spiacevolmente


text:
Talk:pravopiždžija

pravopiždžija
pulls up basically nothing.

—Ruakh TALK 21:13, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * It's Croatian, created by an established user, so I have a strong feeling it's a misspelling.--TBC  22:07, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

 * Right spelling but rare usage, especially in writing. It’s not new but you probably won’t find it Google books. Some Croatian dictionaries carry it. —Stephen 01:24, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

 * Provided 3 cites that don't span 3 years (yet), but its listed in the dictionaries that were written >10 years ago so it surely isn't a proto/neo-logism. There are also some hits for this and the misspelling pravopižđija in inflected forms on various fora and blogs, but rarely in formal texts since this is chiefly a colloquialism (perhaps citing blogs would be better, but I don't trust that kind of manipulable media as a reference). --Ivan Štambuk 19:05, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

RFV passed; thanks for the cites, Ivan! (Note that they only need to span one year, not three.) —Ruakh TALK 14:38, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:pravopiždžija


text:
squisitezza

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) deliciousness, tastiness
 * 2) delicacy
 * 3) exquisiteness, delicacy

title: squisitezza


text:
squamule

Etymology
See and.

Noun

 * 1)  A small scale.

title: squamule


text:
Talk:afka

afka
Has this really entered the language as a noun? SemperBlotto 18:58, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Added abbreviation, which seems citable. No use of plural noun. All usage seems best construed as abbreviation. DCDuring TALK 12:36, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

 * Deleted. Equinox ◑ 22:27, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:afka


text:
Talk:scrummy

scrummy
2 portmanteaus. Print citations or widespread UK use? DCDuring TALK 12:17, 5 September 2008 (UTC) According to Random House Unabridged dictionary scrummy is a variation of scrumptious. The definition of a mother taking her children to school could be local slang.
 * Scrummy for scrumptious is fairly common, though informal (and is in the OED). The school run term seems to be an invention. SemperBlotto 21:37, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

 * Deleted school run term. Other is about to become cited. Equinox ◑ 22:29, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:scrummy


text:
stringatezza

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) conciseness, concision, terseness, shortness

title: stringatezza


text:
Talk:incestuous

incestuous
Rfv-sense: noun sense. (BTW, we're missing the non-literal senses, if someone would like to add them. If not, I probably will eventually.) —Ruakh TALK 00:43, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

 * Rfv-sense: adverb. DCDuring TALK 01:15, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

RFV failed, noun and adverb removed. —Ruakh TALK 17:56, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Being so close or intimate as to prevent proper functioning
An incestuous relationship between organized crime and government. --Backinstadiums (talk) 17:16, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:incestuous


text:
Talk:glaðr

glaðr
Rfv-sense

Can anyone cite the meaning “smooth” for glaðr? – Krun 00:10, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

 * This was done by User:Drago, whose work in the numerous languages he did not speak (he knew only Hungarian and a little English but entered words in every imaginable language except what he knew) was very frequently found to be in error. If you question one of his entries, just assume it’s wrong and correct it if you can. —Stephen 14:10, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

 * I have some knowledge of the current Scandinavian languages. Out of sheer curiosity I checked the Old Norse texts that I found together with a translation in the internet, and found no support for the meaning "smooth". German glatt (smooth) was mentioned as cognate in several word lists, which may be the source of confusion. The word sléttr was translated as smooth a couple of times.--Hekaheka 17:36, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

RFV failed, sense removed. —Ruakh TALK 18:34, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:glaðr


text:
Talk:pontifier

pontifier
Rfv-sense: English verb: one who pontifies [sic]. pontify is not an English verb according to the OneLook dictionaries, not is pontifier an English noun. DCDuring TALK 18:53, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

 * The OED has undefined:, with quotations dating from 1883, but not . However, it makes perfect morphological sense as an agent noun. †  ﴾(u):Raifʻhār (t):Doremítzwr﴿ 19:17, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

 * I look forward to citations of valid uses of pontifier as an English noun. Certainly that would be the right way to derive it from pontify, if anyone did so and used it. pontify is a separate matter. Perhaps we need that entry. DCDuring TALK 19:38, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

 * I have confirmed that "pontify" would be verifiable and entered it, though I haven't actually cited it. I am having trouble finding clearly valid usage citations for "pontifier" as an English noun. DCDuring TALK 20:07, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

 * Does, "Don is just a pontifier. All he does is talk. Durgen" count? http://corruptionfreeanguilla.blogspot.com/2008/09/pontificate.html

 * That's the usage. It would make a good usage example. But we need "durably archived media" for "attestation" (verification) purposes. Blogs and the web don't count. We treat print media and Usenet as durably archived, but we like to use the computer-accessible forms of books, news articles, and scholarly articles as Google has them. "Pontifier" will probably make it, but finding the durably archived supporting citations is a bit of a nuisance sometimes. I had challenged this one because I'd never heard of it and thought that "pontificator" would be used instead. It looks like I will be proven to have challenged it unnecessarily, but getting the citations helps prove that it's a good word and can lead to refining the definition. DCDuring TALK 18:12, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

RFV failed, English section removed. —Ruakh TALK 20:05, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:pontifier


text:
Talk:plonk

plonk
Beware the dreaded bacronym ("A Person of Little Or No Knowledge"). Acronymic etymologies, especially for slang terms, are almost invariably wrong. Whether it is now considered an acronym or not is irrelevant — the etymology can only be one thing (shortened from "plonker") or the other (a bacronym) or maybe something else, but not more than one thing, unless the etymology is unknown or obscure, in which case it is legitimate to give more than one theory.

Furthermore, there is no good reason to embolden the initials — we know what an acronym is — and they should not be capitalised. — Paul G 09:38, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

 * Claim deleted. —Ruakh TALK 19:51, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:plonk


text:
stringatamente

Etymology
From.

Adverb

 * 1) concisely, tersely, shortly

title: stringatamente


text:
Talk:baby mama

baby mama
This is the title of the new Tina Fey movie. It may be a real slang term, or it may just be the movie title. --EncycloPetey 04:11, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

 * It’s a real slang term originating from black English. Also, baby daddy (baby’s father). —Stephen 16:57, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

 * ez 2b cited. DCDuring TALK 17:42, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 2 new senses added, need to be cited. DCDuring TALK 10:53, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

 * Ok, new approach: should we remove, and instead mention those senses in a Usage notes section, warning that when some have (mistakenly?) used the term in a more general sense it has generated controversy (Obamas vs. Fox News, Brangelina vs. Tabloids) and reaffirm the negative/unmarried connotation? -- Thisis0 17:59, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

 * I just want to know and show what the word means. Current developments in celebrity usage seem less like Wikt material to me. OTOH, it would seem that whatever controversy has transpired should have generated some usable citations that might be more topical (but soon dated?) than many of our cites. It would seem more important to cite any actual alternative senses than to cover the controversy. DCDuring TALK 20:24, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

 * Don't misread me. I'm not advocating "covering" any controversy, but mentioning that the term has been mistakenly used in a wider context. -- Thisis0 22:56, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

 * There has been material in entries that was topical/PoV. Celebrity misuse doesn't seem especially deserving of our attention and can become a means of PoV ridicule, which undermines the ability of all the WMF wikis to remain on the moral high ground on freedom of information issues.

 * We just need sufficient cites to support including the senses. If some politician's gaffe illustrates the sense, then the citation should speak for itself. DCDuring TALK 01:37, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

 * There's a lot of research and several sources at Transwiki:Baby mama Goldenrowley 04:34, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The Transwiki link was recently deleted. if anyone still trying to verify this word, see instead the source, at Wikipedia Baby mama Goldenrowley 23:56, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

 * Striking, since the one remaining sense is well cited. Equinox ◑ 22:41, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:baby mama


text:
Talk:obiter

obiter
This uncited entry says it is an adjective, but its definition is almost identical to the noun obiter dictum. It may be that "obiter" is used as an abbreviation for "obiter dictum" and that it is used attributively. We cannot tell without cites or experience with its use in context. DCDuring TALK 17:21, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

clocked out DCDuring TALK 00:32, 5 March 2009 (UTC) withdrawn (cleaned up} DCDuring TALK 00:47, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:obiter


text:
Talk:innerduce

innerduce
Isn't this just a bad pronunciation? SemperBlotto 13:26, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

 * With 68 raw bgc hits, perhaps we should have it as eye dialect. I don't think it should be shown as inflected, though. DCDuring TALK 16:09, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Cited (passed) per DCDuring.—msh210 ℠ 08:23, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

 * Cited? I don't see the citations anywhere. Equinox ◑ 22:48, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

 * Me, either, but I've added three b.g.c. cites now, so it should be good. —Ruakh TALK 00:25, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

 * Striking; now cited. Equinox ◑ 23:12, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:innerduce


text:
opdagen

Etymology
From. Equivalent to.

Verb

 * 1)  to show up, to appear
 * 2)  to summon, to subpoena

title: opdagen


text:
taccagneria

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) meanness, stinginess

title: taccagneria


text:
verdezza

Etymology
From or.

Noun

 * 1) greenness

title: verdezza


text:
Talk:blah

RFV discussion
"in plural: a general feeling of discomfort, boredom, etc". If verified, needs to be moved to blahs. — Paul G 09:58, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

 * It's in dictionaries. In addition to adding content to blahs:, wouldn't we leave a breadcrumb, somewhat as-written, at blah:? -- Thisis0 15:30, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

 * I like the breadcrumb, but I'm not sure that it is official policy to have it. It would be easy to verify both singular and plural though. I would claim widespread use for them in the US. DCDuring TALK 16:33, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

 * I agree on both the widespread US usage and the likeability of the breadcrumb. --EncycloPetey 17:05, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

 * Cited at blah and removed RFV, because it really is common (and, as mentioned, is in at least one dictionary). I haven't done anything about the proposed move to blahs. Equinox 01:20, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

Use in text
Blah is used in text to state that someone is either confused or mentally retarded

Hyphenation
bla·hing --Backinstadiums (talk) 16:39, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

 * Wrong in British English, where it's blah·ing. Equinox ◑ 16:40, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:blah


text:
trascuratezza

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) negligence, neglect, carelessness

title: trascuratezza


text:
Talk:spritely

spritely
With regard to computer sprites (moving graphics). Equinox 21:23, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

 * I do see a few instances of this on b.g.c., but they all seem to be conscious one-off puns. I don't think this is genuinely a sense of this word, if you see what I mean. —Ruakh TALK 22:51, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

 * Deleted: striking. Equinox ◑ 18:51, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:spritely


text:
trascurataggine

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) negligence, neglect, carelessness

title: trascurataggine


text:
Talk:præmium

præmium
An anon added the alt spelling præmium, and has been adding a number of similar alt spellings. Do we do this "æ" stuff? Couldn't this create a bottomless pit for alt spellings? -- WikiPedant 02:36, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

 * The pit may be deep, but it's not bottomless. It probably merits an obsolete archaic tag. It does our users no harm. It is also useless normally to our standard-issue user who could not reproduce "æ" except by cut-and-paste. It seems to me that it has its greatest (albeit very modest) value as an alternative spelling/form on the entry for premium. DCDuring TALK 11:34, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

 * And was præmiums ever used as the plural? Which electronic sources reliably reproduce the ligature anyway for attestation purposes? DCDuring TALK 11:45, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

 * prœmium: is easy to cite using, but pulls up no English hits. —Ruakh TALK 13:27, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

 * At least some of the cites on the first page of seem, on magnified inspection, to be of the "ae" ligature. This merely illustrates the difficulty in attesting such entries using our usual tools. My personal conclusion is that I will not expend another minute on an entry with a ligature again. We could use an entry for the more important spelling praemium DCDuring TALK 16:23, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

RFV failed, entry deleted (and removed from the alternative-spellings list at [[premium]]). —Ruakh TALK 14:32, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Heh, I should’ve got to this one earlier. I’ve recreated the entry with adequate attestation; can someone mark this RfV-passed and then restrike the header? †  ﴾(u):Raifʻhār (t):Doremítzwr﴿ 12:29, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * RFV passed - three extant quotations. The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 12:48, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:præmium


text:
Talk:heben

heben
Someone appears to have got the language wrong in the Alemannic German section, because this looks like another Germanic language, but definitely not Alemannic -- Prince Kassad 18:42, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

 * He insists that it’s "Bernian", which I understand to be the Berne dialect of Alemannic. What else could Bernian refer to? —Stephen 04:34, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Whatever he may insist, Bernian looks different. The examples in the entry here show a shift from /ʃ/ to /s/, which is a typical sign of Low German dialects. -- Prince Kassad 05:22, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

 * This is the same anon (141.158.116.8) who has been adding "Mylanian" words. I now think we should revert or delete all of his entries as unreliable. —Stephen 22:02, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

RFV failed, section removed. —Ruakh TALK 14:27, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:heben


text:
Talk:double entendre

double entendre
Rfv-sense: plural. —Ruakh TALK 16:55, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

 * Please take a look at the cites. DCDuring TALK 20:02, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

 * They look sound, especially the latter two; thanks. In your opinion, is "double entendre" in standard plural use? —Ruakh TALK 20:43, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

 * I am not convinced by the citations. The first one is using the word as a word (as one might say "the kind of joke usually labelled pun"), and I believe the other two are using it as a mass noun. Equinox 21:49, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

 * I'm not at all certain, but the cites shown are all I could find at b.g.c. It certainly seems non-standard, not terribly common, and possibly interpretable as a mass noun per Equinox. DCDuring TALK 22:57, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

 * Alternative explanation: there have been three writers (so far) who did not know the plural of "double entendre". --Hekaheka 04:46, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

RFV passed, kept as nonstandard. Thanks, DCDuring. —Ruakh TALK 20:59, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Example
I heard the example as, "A woman walks into a bar and asks for a double entendre, so the barman gives her one". Not sure if the expression "give her one" is more of a British term, but to me this version is funnier. 208.81.28.208

Might English plural forms include doubles entendre and/or doubles entendres?
So, which is the correct pluralisation? allixpeeke (talk) 10:01, 18 December 2018 (UTC) P. S. The term doubles entendres appears on this Oxford Living Dictionary page, while this Oxford Living Dictionary page refers to double entendres.
 * Sources for doubles entendre by year: 1847, 1884, 1997, 2010, 2012
 * Sources for doubles entendres by year: 1790, 1816, 1866, 1874, 1882, 1883, 1885, 2003, 2013–2017, 2015, 2017

title: Talk:double entendre


text:
eikenboom

Etymology
Compound of.

Noun

 * 1) oak tree

title: eikenboom


text: pontificali

title: pontificali


text: posatori

title: posatori


text: posatrici

title: posatrici


text: stamperie

title: stamperie


text: vestizioni

title: vestizioni


text: zoomorfismi

title: zoomorfismi


text: titubanze

title: titubanze


text:
unni

Adjective

 * 1)  united

Adjective

 * 1) little, small

Alternative forms

 * d'unni
 * dunni

Etymology
From.

Adverb

 * 1) where

title: unni


text: eritritoli

title: eritritoli


text:
թափել

Etymology
From and.

Verb

 * 1)  to empty, to pour out; to spill by accident
 * 2)  to pour into
 * 3) to strew, to scatter
 * 4) to throw down
 * 5) to throw away, throw out
 * 6)  to found, to cast in a mould
 * 7)  to ejaculate, to cum
 * 8)  to pour out, to give vent
 * 9) to shed, to spill

title: թափել


text: pentacriniti

title: pentacriniti


text: sussiegosa

title: sussiegosa


text: sussiegosi

title: sussiegosi


text: pentacrini

title: pentacrini


text: sussiegose

title: sussiegose


text: pentacubi

title: pentacubi


text: strenua

title: strenua


text: strenui

title: strenui


text: policubi

title: policubi


text:
strenue

Etymology 1
From.

Adverb

 * 1) briskly, quickly, actively

Etymology 2
Inflected form of.

title: strenue


text: pentadecagoni

title: pentadecagoni


text: zoomorfa

title: zoomorfa


text: zoomorfi

title: zoomorfi


text: pentagoniti

title: pentagoniti


text: zoomorfe

title: zoomorfe


text: zoomorfica

title: zoomorfica


text: pentaidriti

title: pentaidriti


text: zoomorfici

title: zoomorfici


text: zoomorfiche

title: zoomorfiche


text: pentaidroboriti

title: pentaidroboriti


text:
unna

Etymology
From, from. Cognate with 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, related to Danish, , , Swedish verb , German , Dutch verb.

Verb

 * 1) to grant, allow

Etymology
From, from.

Verb

 * 1) to love

Etymology
From.

Adverb

 * 1) away

Preposition

 * 1) away from

Etymology 1
From.

Adverb

 * 1) away

Preposition

 * 1) away from

Etymology 2
From. Akin to 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬 (from 🇨🇬).

Verb

 * 1) to think someone deserves something, to be happy for someone because of their happiness

Etymology
From, from , from , ultimately from.

Noun

 * 1) nail, fingernail, toenail

Etymology 1
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to grant, bestow
 * 2)  to love
 * 3) * c. 1185, Anonymous, N B465, Bryggen
 * "non"

- ᛘᚢᚿ ᚦᚢ ᛘᛂᚴ ᛘᛆᚿ ᛂᚴ ᚦ / ᛂᚴ ᚢᚿ ᚦᚢ ᛘᛂᚱ ᛆᚿ ᛂᚴ ᚦᛂᚱ

 * 1)  to love one another

Descendants

 * Bokmål:
 * Nynorsk: ,
 * Bokmål:
 * Nynorsk: ,
 * Nynorsk: ,

Etymology 2
Past participle forms of.

Etymology
From, from.

Verb

 * 1) to grant, to bestow
 * 2) to wish for
 * 3) to like, to love

Noun

 * 1) his/her mother

Etymology
From, from , from. Cognate with 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, related Danish adjective, Swedish verb , German.

Verb

 * 1)  to allow oneself to have something (one deserves), to indulge
 * 2)  to allow someone to have something (one thinks) they want or would want (and deserve), to not begrudge
 * Kort sagt: jag unnar honom sina funder
 * Und kurz und gut, ich gönn Ihm das Vergnügen, (Goethe's Faust: Wald und Höhle)
 * Well, to be brief, the joy as fit occasions rise, I grudge you not (Goethe's Faust: Forest and Cavern)
 * Kort sagt: jag unnar honom sina funder
 * Und kurz und gut, ich gönn Ihm das Vergnügen, (Goethe's Faust: Wald und Höhle)
 * Well, to be brief, the joy as fit occasions rise, I grudge you not (Goethe's Faust: Forest and Cavern)
 * Und kurz und gut, ich gönn Ihm das Vergnügen, (Goethe's Faust: Wald und Höhle)
 * Well, to be brief, the joy as fit occasions rise, I grudge you not (Goethe's Faust: Forest and Cavern)

Usage notes
"Allow" in a broad sense in, that also includes not begrudging in situations where one has no control over whether someone has or gets something.

title: unna


text:
unne

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to be glad about
 * 2) to allow, give, grant
 * 3)  to allow oneself, indulge in
 * 4)  to not begrudge / grudge

Etymology 1
Compare 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Adverb

 * 1) below

Antonyms

 * owwe

Etymology 2
Compare 🇨🇬.

Preposition

 * 1) without

title: unne


text: pentalfe

title: pentalfe


text:
notenboom

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) nut tree, especially walnut tree

title: notenboom


text: pentaeritrili

title: pentaeritrili


text: pentamini

title: pentamini


text: pentamerica

title: pentamerica


text: pentamerici

title: pentamerici


text: polimini

title: polimini


text: pentameriche

title: pentameriche


text: pentaprismatica

title: pentaprismatica


text: pentaprismi

title: pentaprismi


text: pentaprismatici

title: pentaprismatici


text: pentaspecchi

title: pentaspecchi


text: pentaprismatiche

title: pentaprismatiche


text: pizzetti

title: pizzetti


text: svagatezze

title: svagatezze


text: svagataggini

title: svagataggini


text: stentatezze

title: stentatezze


text: spenzolando

title: spenzolando


text: splendidezze

title: splendidezze


text: spenzolante

title: spenzolante


text: spenzolato

title: spenzolato


text: spiacevolezze

title: spiacevolezze


text: spenzolati

title: spenzolati


text: spenzolata

title: spenzolata


text: squisitezze

title: squisitezze


text: spenzolo

title: spenzolo


text: spenzoli

title: spenzoli


text: stringatezze

title: stringatezze


text: spenzola

title: spenzola


text: spenzoliamo

title: spenzoliamo


text: taccagnerie

title: taccagnerie


text: spenzolate

title: spenzolate


text: spenzolano

title: spenzolano


text: verdezze

title: verdezze


text: spenzolavo

title: spenzolavo


text: spenzolavi

title: spenzolavi


text: trascuratezze

title: trascuratezze


text: spenzolava

title: spenzolava


text: spenzolavamo

title: spenzolavamo


text: spenzolavate

title: spenzolavate


text: trascurataggini

title: trascurataggini


text: spenzolavano

title: spenzolavano


text: spenzolai

title: spenzolai


text: spenzolasti

title: spenzolasti


text: spenzolò

title: spenzolò


text: spenzolammo

title: spenzolammo


text: spenzolaste

title: spenzolaste


text: spenzolarono

title: spenzolarono


text: spenzolerò

title: spenzolerò


text: spenzolerai

title: spenzolerai


text: spenzolerà

title: spenzolerà


text: titubando

title: titubando


text: spenzoleremo

title: spenzoleremo


text: spenzolerete

title: spenzolerete


text: spenzoleranno

title: spenzoleranno


text: titubati

title: titubati


text: spenzolerei

title: spenzolerei


text: titubata

title: titubata


text: spenzoleresti

title: spenzoleresti


text:
titubo

Etymology
From a reduplication of, from. Compare 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1) to stagger, totter, reel
 * 2) to hesitate, falter, waver
 * 1) to hesitate, falter, waver

title: titubo


text: spenzolerebbe

title: spenzolerebbe


text: titubi

title: titubi


text: spenzoleremmo

title: spenzoleremmo


text: tituba

title: tituba


text: spenzolereste

title: spenzolereste


text: titubiamo

title: titubiamo


text: spenzolerebbero

title: spenzolerebbero


text: spenzoliate

title: spenzoliate


text: titubano

title: titubano


text: spenzolino

title: spenzolino


text: titubavo

title: titubavo


text: spenzolassi

title: spenzolassi


text: titubavi

title: titubavi


text: spenzolasse

title: spenzolasse


text: titubava

title: titubava


text: spenzolassimo

title: spenzolassimo


text: titubavamo

title: titubavamo


text: spenzolassero

title: spenzolassero


text: titubavate

title: titubavate


text: spenzolarmi

title: spenzolarmi


text: spenzolarti

title: spenzolarti


text: titubavano

title: titubavano


text: spenzolarci

title: spenzolarci


text: titubai

title: titubai


text: spenzolarvi

title: spenzolarvi


text: titubasti

title: titubasti


text: titubò

title: titubò


text: spenzolandosi

title: spenzolandosi


text: spenzolandomi

title: spenzolandomi


text: titubammo

title: titubammo


text: straboccando

title: straboccando


text: titubaste

title: titubaste


text: spenzolandoti

title: spenzolandoti


text: straboccante

title: straboccante


text: titubarono

title: titubarono


text: spenzolandoci

title: spenzolandoci


text: straboccato

title: straboccato


text: spenzolandovi

title: spenzolandovi


text: tituberò

title: tituberò


text: tituberai

title: tituberai


text: straboccati

title: straboccati


text: tituberà

title: tituberà


text: straboccata

title: straboccata


text: tituberemo

title: tituberemo


text: strabocco

title: strabocco


text: tituberete

title: tituberete


text: strabocchi

title: strabocchi


text: tituberanno

title: tituberanno


text: spenzoliamoci

title: spenzoliamoci


text: strabocca

title: strabocca


text: tituberei

title: tituberei


text: spenzolatevi

title: spenzolatevi


text: tituberesti

title: tituberesti


text: strabocchiamo

title: strabocchiamo


text: tituberebbe

title: tituberebbe


text: straboccate

title: straboccate


text: tituberemmo

title: tituberemmo


text: straboccano

title: straboccano


text: titubereste

title: titubereste


text: straboccavo

title: straboccavo


text: tituberebbero

title: tituberebbero


text: titubiate

title: titubiate


text: straboccavi

title: straboccavi


text: titubino

title: titubino


text: straboccava

title: straboccava


text: titubassi

title: titubassi


text: straboccavamo

title: straboccavamo


text: titubasse

title: titubasse


text: straboccavate

title: straboccavate


text: titubassimo

title: titubassimo


text: titubassero

title: titubassero


text: straboccavano

title: straboccavano


text: stormendo

title: stormendo


text: straboccai

title: straboccai


text: stormente

title: stormente


text: straboccasti

title: straboccasti


text: stormiti

title: stormiti


text: straboccò

title: straboccò


text: stormita

title: stormita


text: straboccammo

title: straboccammo


text: stormisco

title: stormisco


text: straboccaste

title: straboccaste


text: stormisci

title: stormisci


text: straboccarono

title: straboccarono


text: stormisce

title: stormisce


text: stormiamo

title: stormiamo


text: straboccherò

title: straboccherò


text: stormite

title: stormite


text: straboccherai

title: straboccherai


text: stormiscono

title: stormiscono


text: straboccherà

title: straboccherà


text: stormivo

title: stormivo


text: straboccheremo

title: straboccheremo


text: stormivi

title: stormivi


text: straboccherete

title: straboccherete


text: stormiva

title: stormiva


text: stormivamo

title: stormivamo


text: straboccheranno

title: straboccheranno


text: stormivate

title: stormivate


text: straboccherei

title: straboccherei


text: stormivano

title: stormivano


text: straboccheresti

title: straboccheresti


text: stormii

title: stormii


text: straboccherebbe

title: straboccherebbe


text: stormisti

title: stormisti


text: straboccheremmo

title: straboccheremmo


text: stormì

title: stormì


text: stormimmo

title: stormimmo


text: strabocchereste

title: strabocchereste


text: stormiste

title: stormiste


text: straboccherebbero

title: straboccherebbero


text: stormirono

title: stormirono


text: strabocchiate

title: strabocchiate


text: stormirò

title: stormirò


text: stormirai

title: stormirai


text: strabocchino

title: strabocchino


text: stormirà

title: stormirà


text: straboccassi

title: straboccassi


text: stormiremo

title: stormiremo


text: straboccasse

title: straboccasse


text: stormirete

title: stormirete


text: stormiranno

title: stormiranno


text: straboccassimo

title: straboccassimo


text: stasando

title: stasando


text: stormirei

title: stormirei


text: straboccassero

title: straboccassero


text: stasante

title: stasante


text: stormiresti

title: stormiresti


text: stasato

title: stasato


text: stormirebbe

title: stormirebbe


text: stasati

title: stasati


text: stormiremmo

title: stormiremmo


text: stasata

title: stasata


text: stormireste

title: stormireste


text: staso

title: staso


text: stormirebbero

title: stormirebbero


text: stormisca

title: stormisca


text: stasa

title: stasa


text: stormiate

title: stormiate


text: stasiamo

title: stasiamo


text: stormiscano

title: stormiscano


text: stasate

title: stasate


text: stormissi

title: stormissi


text: stasano

title: stasano


text: stormisse

title: stormisse


text: stasavo

title: stasavo


text: stormissimo

title: stormissimo


text: stormissero

title: stormissero


text: stasavi

title: stasavi


text: stasava

title: stasava


text: stasavamo

title: stasavamo


text: stasavate

title: stasavate


text: stasavano

title: stasavano


text: stasai

title: stasai


text: stasasti

title: stasasti


text: stasò

title: stasò


text: stasammo

title: stasammo


text: stasaste

title: stasaste


text: stasarono

title: stasarono


text: staserò

title: staserò


text: staserai

title: staserai


text: staserà

title: staserà


text: staseremo

title: staseremo


text: staserete

title: staserete


text: staseranno

title: staseranno


text: staserei

title: staserei


text: staseresti

title: staseresti


text: staserebbe

title: staserebbe


text: staseremmo

title: staseremmo


text: stasereste

title: stasereste


text: staserebbero

title: staserebbero


text: stasiate

title: stasiate


text: stasino

title: stasino


text:
թափեմ

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to spill, to empty, to pour out a liquid, a glass; to overturn, to cast down, to fling or throw down; to cast off, to discharge
 * 2)  to deliver, to release, to relieve e.g. a city or a person from death, danger, captivity
 * 3)  to take away, to take by force, to possess oneself of
 * 4)  to add a word
 * 5)  to pour out, to spread, to flow
 * 6)  to be deprived of
 * 7)  to get rid of, to free oneself from, to disentangle oneself, to flee, to save oneself by flight
 * 8)  to take refuge, to emigrate
 * 9)  to go, to reach a country
 * 1)  to deliver, to release, to relieve e.g. a city or a person from death, danger, captivity
 * 2)  to take away, to take by force, to possess oneself of
 * 3)  to add a word
 * 4)  to pour out, to spread, to flow
 * 5)  to be deprived of
 * 6)  to get rid of, to free oneself from, to disentangle oneself, to flee, to save oneself by flight
 * 7)  to take refuge, to emigrate
 * 8)  to go, to reach a country
 * 1)  to deliver, to release, to relieve e.g. a city or a person from death, danger, captivity
 * 2)  to take away, to take by force, to possess oneself of
 * 3)  to add a word
 * 4)  to pour out, to spread, to flow
 * 5)  to be deprived of
 * 6)  to get rid of, to free oneself from, to disentangle oneself, to flee, to save oneself by flight
 * 7)  to take refuge, to emigrate
 * 8)  to go, to reach a country
 * 1)  to take away, to take by force, to possess oneself of
 * 2)  to add a word
 * 3)  to pour out, to spread, to flow
 * 4)  to be deprived of
 * 5)  to get rid of, to free oneself from, to disentangle oneself, to flee, to save oneself by flight
 * 6)  to take refuge, to emigrate
 * 7)  to go, to reach a country
 * 1)  to pour out, to spread, to flow
 * 2)  to be deprived of
 * 3)  to get rid of, to free oneself from, to disentangle oneself, to flee, to save oneself by flight
 * 4)  to take refuge, to emigrate
 * 5)  to go, to reach a country
 * 1)  to be deprived of
 * 2)  to get rid of, to free oneself from, to disentangle oneself, to flee, to save oneself by flight
 * 3)  to take refuge, to emigrate
 * 4)  to go, to reach a country
 * 1)  to get rid of, to free oneself from, to disentangle oneself, to flee, to save oneself by flight
 * 2)  to take refuge, to emigrate
 * 3)  to go, to reach a country
 * 1)  to get rid of, to free oneself from, to disentangle oneself, to flee, to save oneself by flight
 * 2)  to take refuge, to emigrate
 * 3)  to go, to reach a country
 * 1)  to take refuge, to emigrate
 * 2)  to go, to reach a country

title: թափեմ


text: stasassi

title: stasassi


text: stasasse

title: stasasse


text: stasassimo

title: stasassimo


text: stasassero

title: stasassero


text: stomacando

title: stomacando


text: stasarmi

title: stasarmi


text: stomacante

title: stomacante


text: stasarti

title: stasarti


text: stomacato

title: stomacato


text: stasarci

title: stasarci


text: stomacati

title: stomacati


text: stasarvi

title: stasarvi


text: stomacata

title: stomacata


text: stasandosi

title: stasandosi


text: stasandomi

title: stasandomi


text: stomaca

title: stomaca


text: stasandoti

title: stasandoti


text: stomachiamo

title: stomachiamo


text: stasandoci

title: stasandoci


text: stomacate

title: stomacate


text: stasandovi

title: stasandovi


text: stomacano

title: stomacano


text: stomacavo

title: stomacavo


text: stomacavi

title: stomacavi


text: stomacava

title: stomacava


text: stomacavamo

title: stomacavamo


text: stomacavate

title: stomacavate


text: stasiamoci

title: stasiamoci


text: stomacavano

title: stomacavano


text: stasatevi

title: stasatevi


text: stomacai

title: stomacai


text: torturarmi

title: torturarmi


text: stomacasti

title: stomacasti


text: torturarti

title: torturarti


text: stomacò

title: stomacò


text: torturarci

title: torturarci


text: stomacammo

title: stomacammo


text: torturarvi

title: torturarvi


text: stomacaste

title: stomacaste


text: torturandosi

title: torturandosi


text: stomacarono

title: stomacarono


text: torturandomi

title: torturandomi


text: stomacherò

title: stomacherò


text: torturandoti

title: torturandoti


text: stomacherai

title: stomacherai


text: torturandoci

title: torturandoci


text: stomacherà

title: stomacherà


text: torturandovi

title: torturandovi


text: stomacheremo

title: stomacheremo


text: stomacherete

title: stomacherete


text: stomacheranno

title: stomacheranno


text: stomacherei

title: stomacherei


text: stomacheresti

title: stomacheresti


text: stomacherebbe

title: stomacherebbe


text: թափիմ

title: թափիմ


text: torturiamoci

title: torturiamoci


text: stomacheremmo

title: stomacheremmo


text: torturatevi

title: torturatevi


text: stomachereste

title: stomachereste


text: stomacherebbero

title: stomacherebbero


text: stomachiate

title: stomachiate


text: stomachino

title: stomachino


text: stomacassi

title: stomacassi


text: stomacasse

title: stomacasse


text: stomacassimo

title: stomacassimo


text: stomacassero

title: stomacassero


text: stomacarmi

title: stomacarmi


text: stomacarti

title: stomacarti


text: stomacarci

title: stomacarci


text: stomacarvi

title: stomacarvi


text: stomacandosi

title: stomacandosi


text: stomacandomi

title: stomacandomi


text: stomacandoti

title: stomacandoti


text: stomacandoci

title: stomacandoci


text: stomacandovi

title: stomacandovi


text: stomachiamoci

title: stomachiamoci


text: stomacatevi

title: stomacatevi


text:
pentazocina

Noun

 * 1)  pentazocine

title: pentazocina


text:
akelig

Etymology
From, which comes from. Related to 🇨🇬.

Adjective

 * 1) unpleasant, eerie

title: akelig


text:
pentecontera

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1)  penteconter

title: pentecontera


text:
pentecontero

Noun

 * 1) penteconter

title: pentecontero


text:
pentecostale

Etymology
and.

Adjective

 * 1) Pentecostal

title: pentecostale


text:
pentecostalismo

Noun

 * 1) Pentecostalism

Noun

 * 1) Pentecostalism a Christian religious movement

Noun

 * 1) Pentecostalism

title: pentecostalismo


text:
penteratto

Noun

 * 1)  penteract

title: penteratto


text:
penteract

Noun

 * 1)  A five-dimensional hypercube.

Translations

 * Italian: penteratto

title: penteract


text:
pietrosità

Etymology
From. .

Noun

 * 1) stoniness
 * 2) stony ground

title: pietrosità


text:
planctonico

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1)  planktonic

title: planctonico


text:
ผีฟ้า

Etymology
From ; literally "god from heaven", "god of heaven", or "heavenly god".

Noun

 * 1)  deity; god.
 * 2) * มหาชาติคำหลวง:
 * , เขียนแผ่นดินลาว:
 * 1)  monarch; sovereign.
 * 2) * จารึกวัดศรีชุม:
 * 1)  monarch; sovereign.
 * 2) * จารึกวัดศรีชุม:

title: ผีฟ้า


text:
plasmacellula

Noun

 * 1)  plasma cell, plasmocyte

title: plasmacellula


text:
Talk:graphics engine

graphics engine
Again, sum of parts. Even the definition says nothing more than "an engine that does graphics". We can also have a physics engine, a music engine, a conversation engine, etc. ad infinitum. Equinox ◑ 20:48, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

 * Keep idiomatic - there is no physical engine. --Connel MacKenzie 19:57, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

 * That is irrelevant. Look at what engine means in computing terms. Anything of this kind can be a ___ engine. You might as well argue to keep car engine because there is no engine in the computing sense. Equinox ◑ 22:15, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

 * The fact that car engine should also be a valid entry here is irrelevant. Again, the premise of nominating this only because it can be sum-of-parts is an error.  That alone is no justification for deletion.  Even if that ill-conceived notion had currency, this specific case goes far beyond that.  The term graphics engine is idiomatic.  That alone, is reason enough for it to be kept.  --Connel MacKenzie 13:03, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

 * I think physics engine might be worth having because it's a bit abstract, but I'm not sure if there's a good enough reason to keep graphics engine, as common as it is both in the programming world and the video game world. "Technical term" isn't convincing to me, seems like a cop-out in this case. Certainly the other examples are not inclusion worthy. 63.95.64.254 04:04, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Keep The meaning is not self-evident – we can see this because the definition expands software engine.

By the way, both software engine and application are jargon, and the definition totally depends on words in the term. How about An independent part of a computer program that processes information for visual display, or some such? —Michael Z. 2009-03-24 16:56 z

Kept per consensus --Jackofclubs 12:42, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

 * Still strongly feel this should be deleted. Ah well. Equinox ◑ 23:33, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:graphics engine


text:
Talk:whackage

RFD discussion — moved to RFV
Supposedly some kind of free-for-all video game. The word does appear on Usenet (though not to any extent in Google Books), but it does not seem to have this sense at all. Mostly it seems to mean whacking or snipping (removing posted content to make a reply smaller). Equinox ◑ 00:25, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

 * Probably doesn't belong on Wiktionary, but should be listed on WT:RFV. 63.95.64.254 02:27, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

 * True. Moved to RFV. Equinox ◑ 18:44, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

RFV discussion — failed
[Moved here from an earlier RFD.] Supposedly some kind of free-for-all video game. The word does appear on Usenet (though not to any extent in Google Books), but it does not seem to have this sense at all. Mostly it seems to mean whacking or snipping (removing posted content to make a reply smaller). Equinox ◑ 00:25, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

 * Probably doesn't belong on Wiktionary, but should be listed on WT:RFV. 63.95.64.254 02:27, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

 * Everything I was able to find meant something along the lines of "excessive whacking of things", couldn't find anything about a genre or type of game. Never heard it personally. -  19:02, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

 * Deleted. Equinox ◑ 01:31, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:whackage


text:
Appendix talk:List of protologisms/third person singular gender neutral pronouns

List of protologisms by topic/third person singular gender neutral pronouns
What is that doing there? This is a copy of the Wikipedia appendix, without attribution, isn't it? --Connel MacKenzie 00:09, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

 * Keep. It's in a harmless place - subpage of a protologism page. Some have attribution. It is clearly about protologisms too. --Jackofclubs 09:32, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

 * Keep — useful and interesting. †  ﴾(u):Raifʻhār (t):Doremítzwr﴿ 13:19, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Kept no good reason for deletion.

Ableism
The use of self-feeding as an example to describe a form of pronoun is discriminatory against those folks unable to feed themselves due to disease or disability. It is problematic. I would recommend changing the verb to "love" - "xe loves xyrself".

150.135.210.125 04:56, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Dead Link
The link for reference 6 is dead. Anyone know more about this paper or where to find it? --

 * it's on webarchive, i fixed the link. --Habst (talk) 16:46, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Attested pronouns
It is confusing (as recent edits show) that there's one list (this list) with a lot of protologisms and attested (but "proposed"/coined by some specific person/group) pronouns in it, another list for attested pronouns, and mainspace entries to boot. We should probably move all the pronouns which are attested and in the mainspace out of this list, and have it just be for protologisms, like the rest of WT:LOP. And entries should stop linking here and link only to the appendix of attested pronouns. I will do this later if no one objects or bears me to it. - -sche (discuss) 19:30, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

What about "Ou"?
See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-person_pronoun#Historical_and_dialectal_gender-neutral_pronouns --85.229.234.144 18:12, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Agree, ou is also mentioned in Wiktionary (as obsolete or dialectal), but unfortunately without regional attribution. --91.79.227.114 13:08, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

RFD discussion: March–April 2021
The rest of LOP has been deleted through RFDO, but I didn't delete this page, as it's quite unlike the rest of LOP — much of it is referenced, and it may potentially have some lexicographical interest. I am inclined to delete it as well, but I thought it merited its own discussion. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 00:03, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

 * Most of the terms which have references (which are thus more similar to the "dictionary-only terms" appendices than to the main LOP) also have attestations and are in the other appendix, of attested pronouns, while the remaining terms seem to be unused, so the utility is as low as the rest of the LOP. The exceptions are ho, tou and vey, which have references but aren't in the attested-pronouns appendix; I may copy those three over to a userspace list of "terms to determine later if are attested". Otherwise, my opinion on all the LOP appendices is that I don't really care one way or the other whether it exists, so abstain, leaning towards deleting for consistency with the rest of the LOP. - -sche (discuss) 23:36, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Ultimateria (talk) 18:27, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

 * RFD-deleted. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 00:02, 27 April 2021 (UTC)


text:
Template talk:space

Template:space
Less than a dozen uses and already garbled in scope, with stuff related to "space" in general, "spatial exploration" and "space prepositions". Keeping it is just a recipe for total confusion. Circeus 16:03, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

 * Unless someone can produce a list of terms that could reasonably use this as a context template, I agree. --EncycloPetey 19:28, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

 * Actually, the problem is not that the term cannot be used at all: both "space/spatial organization" and "space exploration" (or should that just be "astronomy"?) are legitimate categories to me. It's more that this template is too ambiguous to properly serve for either. Circeus 20:48, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Fixed. DAVilla 18:43, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

title: Template talk:space


text:
Thesaurus talk:stingy

Wikisaurus:stingy
The page Wikisaurus:stingy is subsumed by Wikisaurus:miser, which is much more extensive, hence I nominate “stingy” for deletion.

Nbarth (email) (talk) 23:38, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

 * Delete.—msh210 ℠ 22:48, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

 * I look at primary meanings only. These are different entries, an adjective and a verb. Keep. DAVilla 08:33, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

 * Keep. Per DAVilla. A --Dan Polansky 11:02, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

 * Kept per logic. stingy clearly has different meanings than miser. --Jackofclubs 17:38, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

title: Thesaurus talk:stingy


text:
Template talk:R:She Literally Exploded

RfD discussion for the category with incorrectly capitalisation
This discussion was not for the template per se, but rather for an empty category of the same name but with incorrect initial capitalisation (Category:the proscriptions of She Literally Exploded), which I had forgotten to tag with. However, some pertinent points were raised in the discussion about the category itself, so I præserve the discussion hereat, lest the category itself be nominated for deletion in future. †  ﴾(u):Raifʻhār (t):Doremítzwr﴿ 19:30, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

No content. No explanation. SemperBlotto 08:39, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

 * I don't see why we would have any category, especially not a visible one, for pop usage guides. I thought we were no kind of "scriptivist", except "de-". DCDuring TALK 11:00, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

 * The idea could be useful for an Appendix and/or Usage notes, but not as a category. -- Visviva 11:06, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

 * See Template:R:She Literally Exploded. DCDuring TALK 11:12, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

 * The book is here. (and this is interesting too) Should not be a category. The title reminds me of one of my favourite comic strips: (son comes home from tough rugby match) Father: "how did it go?" Son: "we literally killed them!" Father: "um, do you know what 'literally' means?" "No." "Good!" Robert Ullmann 11:36, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

 * Delete. I created this, but then moved all the content and explanation to Category:The proscriptions of She Literally Exploded (the only change being the capitalisation of the initial undefined:). I forgot to tag the old spelling with afterwards, that’s all. Sorry for the inconvenience. †  ﴾(u):Raifʻhār (t):Doremítzwr﴿ 14:47, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

 * Delete both. —Ruakh TALK 15:04, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

 * Is there a worthwhile BP discussion to be had about how to descriptively take advantage of the copious pro- and prescriptive advice of the numerous usage guides without getting into copyvio and other problems? In usage notes and entry talk pages folks like to say "many authorities" have this or that recommendation but without references. We should be able to do better. DCDuring TALK 15:13, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

 * Indeed, as Connel has on his user page:
 * “…I happen to know for a fact that God doesn’t care whether you split infinitives. But some people do, and that’s a simple fact that no statistical table will change. A good descriptivist should tell you that. In fact, my beef with many descriptivists is that they don’t describe enough. A really thorough description of a word or usage would take into account not only how many people use it, but in what circumstances and to what effect.”
 * Of course, that’s all well and good, as long as we can back up with references our usage notes that tell our readers, for example, that some people dislike split infinitives. Our usage notes should either: 1) reference objections by other usage authorities; 2) show than a usage is a bone of some contention by quoting logomachies undertaken in durably-archived media (Google groups is surprisingly fairly good for this); and/or, 3) at the very least, explain entirely the rationale within the usage note itself (as, I believe, I did for ).
 * AFAICT, what I’m doing with She Literally Exploded is not copyright violation: I’m not quoting anything, but rather giving the gist of the objection and then marking whence I took the objection; AFAIK, intellectual property governs the expression of ideas, rather than the ideas themselves.
 * The category is useful because SLE’s proscriptions are those which the readership of the Daily Telegraph (numbering a considerable 882,413 — more than any other British newspaper — in October 2007) find most infuriating; any writer or announcer who gives two hoots specifically about the DT readership will therefore want a handy category which specifically lists those usages to avoid when addressing the DT readership.
 * FWIW, I don’t agree with that many of the proscriptions SLE makes, finding them at times fussy and founded on no good reason; however, they object, so that ought to be noted. Counterarguments to the proscriptions of usage authorities, when extant and reasonable, ought to be included in usage notes as well, allowing our readers to decide for themselves which usage rationale to adopt.
 * †  ﴾(u):Raifʻhār (t):Doremítzwr﴿ 16:04, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

 * Delete both. Not appropriate. Cirt (talk) 09:02, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Why is such a category inappropriate? †  ﴾(u):Raifʻhār (t):Doremítzwr﴿ 19:41, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
 * IMO, it is inappropriate because categories should be for core properties of an entry, and this is not a core property. The short reason for this is that allowing a category for any accidental property of a word or sense leads to massive category bloat and makes the system unusable. There are hundreds if not thousands of usage guides which are or have been important in a given context; we can't have a separate category for each one. It makes much more sense for the entry to go into Category:Disputed usage and the details of the proscription(s) given in the entry itself. For central control, a list would be fine, or one could use the automatic list generated by Special:Whatlinkshere/R:She Literally Exploded. -- Visviva 03:20, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Personally, I don’t see a problem with having a category for each usage guide; even if they did become too numerous, we could create a supra-category such as Category:Usage guides: and then have all those categories as subcategories thereof. If the 1 cat./usage guide idea is considered inappropriate, then all of SLE’s proscriptions could be shifted to a category like Category:Problematic usages for the Daily Telegraph readership which would also include the advice of authorities like the DT’s style guide &c. Using Whatlinkshere wouldn’t work in the long term because once all of SLE’s objections have been noted on Wiktionary, will be <tt>subst:</tt>’d because the template will no longer be necessary for further transclusions and its continuing existence will do nothing but slow down page-loading times be requiring an additional template call. †  ﴾(u):Raifʻhār (t):Doremítzwr﴿ 03:56, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

RfD discussion for the category proper
Please note that two links in the following discussion have been redirected to the RfD discussion section above this one because they were formerly red-linked (the refered-to content is identical). †  ﴾(u):Raifʻhār (t):Doremítzwr﴿ 16:50, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

See Category talk:The proscriptions of She Literally Exploded. The main point, IMHO, was made by User:Visviva: "IMO, it is inappropriate because categories should be for core properties of an entry, and this is not a core property. The short reason for this is that allowing a category for any accidental property of a word or sense leads to massive category bloat and makes the system unusable. There are hundreds if not thousands of usage guides which are or have been important in a given context; we can't have a separate category for each one. It makes much more sense for the entry to go into Category:Disputed usage and the details of the proscription(s) given in the entry itself. For central control, a list would be fine, or one could use the automatic list generated by Special:Whatlinkshere/R:She Literally Exploded."

The key point here is "for core properties of an entry" - this is not a "core property" of any of the entries - I haven't read this book She Literally Exploded nor have I heard of it before, but even Wikipedia doesn't have an article on it, so IMHO it can't be considered for a category here. IMHO, this information about these proscriptins is based kept in a user subpage (or possibly an appendix). --Jackofclubs 12:32, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

 * Delete. The less publicity given to the Telegraph's nonsensical style guide, the better, IMO.  Ƿidsiþ 12:35, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

And my response to Visviva in that discussion was: "Personally, I don’t see a problem with having a category for each usage guide; even if they did become too numerous, we could create a supra-category such as <tt>Category:Usage guides:</tt> and then have all those categories as subcategories thereof. If the 1 cat./usage guide idea is considered inappropriate, then all of SLE’s proscriptions could be shifted to a category like Category:Problematic usages for the Daily Telegraph readership which would also include the advice of authorities like the DT’s style guide &c. Using <tt>Whatlinkshere</tt> wouldn’t work in the long term because once all of SLE’s objections have been noted on Wiktionary, will be <tt>subst:</tt>’d because the template will no longer be necessary for further transclusions and its continuing existence will do nothing but slow down page-loading times be requiring an additional template call." To Ƿidsiþ: It really doesn’t matter how “nonsensical” you or I consider the Daily Telegraph’s style guide to be (and be sure, I often do); if one has the task of writing something for the Daily Telegraph readership, he had best avoid “infuriating” them (as said style guide claims these many words do). This category lends a helping hand in such a case. †  ﴾(u):Raifʻhār (t):Doremítzwr﴿ 18:31, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

 * Each of the world's myriad usage guides is important in certain contexts: violate Strunk & White, and you may have a mob of writing teachers on your hands; violate the Chicago Manual of Style, and you may lose your US copyediting job; violate APA style and you may flunk your linguistics class; and so on. But if we documented each of these using categories, the "Categories" listing of the entry would become unusable, just as it was for some English entries before the advent of HIDDENCAT.  A supercategory wouldn't solve this problem in any way that I can see.
 * If these proscriptions are truly relevant for a person writing for this (rather arbitrary) demographic, IMO the best thing would be to have an appendix, titled "Appendix:Considerations for writing for the Daily Telegraph readership" or whatever. Such an appendix could include both these proscriptions and any others which may be relevant (e.g. those which pertain to more general UK or journalistic usage).  The appendix could even be linked from Usage_notes for relevant words.
 * To put it another way: it seems like you want to use categories as tags. Although the lack of a tagging system can be frustrating, that approach just isn't viable.   -- Visviva 06:17, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

 * Delete per me. :-) -- Visviva 06:17, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

 * I see your point about usability of the category space. How about applying HIDDENCAT (?) to this category, which can be linked from the appendix you mention; the <tt>R</tt> template which includes this category can then be edited to include a link to said appendix. That done, I think everyone can be made happy. That sound OK? †  ﴾(u):Raifʻhār (t):Doremítzwr﴿ 20:20, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

 * That would be fine with me, I think. -- Visviva 04:36, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

 * Where does the actual content of the proscription go? Does the Daily Telegraph limit itself to proscribing entire headwords? It would seem that the likely content would belong in an Appendix. A category would seem to have no value to general users at all. Hidden categories cannot have value because the do not see them. What value does the editing community get from this hidden category? DCDuring TALK 10:51, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

 * Delete and check entries in the category for copyvios I don't see the dictionaric value of a plain list of words and phrases mentioned in a style guide.  While incorporating the usage notes of a style guide into Wiktionary would be dictionaric, it would also be a copyright violation, and this particular style guide isn't in the public domain. Carolina wren 06:46, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Deleted category and removed category from Template:R:She Literally Exploded --Jackofclubs 08:16, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

title: Template talk:R:She Literally Exploded


text: spirto

title: spirto


text:
Category talk:Caucasian languages

Category:Caucasian languages
This is not a linguistic category, it is geographical. The families mentioned are not related at all, and should either be moved to 'Languages of the Caucasus' or split by language family. Nadando 22:41, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * They can't be split by language family. One of the reasons this category exists is that relationships among the various languages are very much up in the air, although there is a "feeling" among many experts that many of the languages are related...somehow.  Note that there is a geographical category Category:Languages of the Caucasus, but its contents are different, because there are many other languages spoken in that region which are not part of the "Caucasian" assemblage of languages. --EncycloPetey 18:03, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * One of the reasons this category exists is that relationships among the various languages are very much up in the air - what? there's a very clear consensus that there are three Caucasian language families - that is Northwest, Northeast and South Caucasian. -- Prince Kassad 18:30, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * So, you mean that each of those three groups sprang into existence from non-language independently? The relationships between those groups and other language families is unclear. --EncycloPetey 22:51, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * All categories moved, striking. Nadando 20:11, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

RFDO discussion: August 2014–August 2016
Also included: the family code "cau" and all the categories that use it. This survived deletion back in 2009, but, even after reading through the discussion archived at Category talk:Caucasian languages, I'm not sure why.

This is strictly a geographical grouping: although many linguists have an unprovable hunch that the Northeast Caucasian languages and the Northwest Caucasian languages may be related, there's been very little support for linking them to the Kartvelian languages. Indeed, even among those proposing that the North Caucasian languages are related to everything from Basque to Sino-Tibetan to the Na-Dene languages of North America, and those who say the Kartvelian languages are related to Indo-European, Afro-Asiatic Dravidian, and many others, linking North Caucasian and South Caucasian/Kartvelian is rarely even considered. If there were such a family, it would probably be named the Ibero-Caucasian languages.

This category is mostly a holding category for the three families mentioned, but, judging from the derivational categories, there are a dozen entries that refer to the Caucasian languages as a group in their etymologies, of which seven are Old Armenian. Perhaps we can get an idea from about whether this is a serious obstacle. Chuck Entz (talk) 03:31, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

 * Scholarly sources, modern or dated, dealing with Armenian linguistics often refer to "Caucasian languages", when they cannot distinguish between Kartvelian/East Caucasian/West Caucasian. The code cau is very convenient for such cases. However, I understand that our etymological categories are based on genetic relationship and that the laziness of sources does not justify having this category. I will go through the Old Armenian entries and try to assign them to different branches. So, delete. PS By the way, your ping did not work. --Vahag (talk) 15:38, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

 * Keep. There is no reason that we cannot have a category for languages that are often referred to as "Caucasian languages" outside of our etymological tree. --WikiTiki89 14:59, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

 * Delete for the same reason that Category:Australian languages shouldn't exist. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 21:58, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Yet we do have Category:Languages of Australia. Perhaps we should rename the nominee accordingly. —msh210℠ (talk) 19:52, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per Wikitiki; and per msh210: we have Category:Languages of Australia. shows this is a high-frequency term. --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:04, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is category-cruft that doesn't seem to contribute anything other than some useless pages to click through. Note that we also already have the corresponding non-pseudo-family category: Category:Languages of the Caucasus. If we really need to ensure e.g. that people can find Category:Kartvelian languages even if they don't know the exact term, a page such as List of families could be fitted with a "geographical area" column or similar. As of before this comment, we had one Hungarian term (, now set to NEC) categorized as "derived from Caucasian languages", and still have one Old Armenian term:, which would still have to be sorted out before this. --Tropylium (talk) 22:23, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
 * If all we have is a reference to a meaningless wastebasket-category, why are we even categorizing it? We could put an xcl tag in it so it won't get lost, and just convert the etyl template to straight text. Alternatively, we could replace "Caucasian" with "Northwest Caucasian, Northeast Caucasian or Kartvelian"- ugly and awkward, but it's only one entry.
 * Delete. Category:Languages of the Caucasus is sufficient for this geographical grouping. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 10:32, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Deleted based on the consensus of our linguistically-trained and Caucasian-language editors, pace the two keep voters, who'll have to content themselves with the longstanding category for the geographic grouping, Category:Languages of the Caucasus, that doesn't imply genetic relationship like this category inappropriately did. - -sche (discuss) 08:27, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

title: Category talk:Caucasian languages


text:
tredje från slutet

Adjective

 * 1) third last, antepenultimate

title: tredje från slutet


text:
prořeknout

Verb

 * 1)  to let the cat out of the bag

Usage notes

 * Implies a sudden slip of the tongue which unintentionally reveals a secret.

title: prořeknout


text:
alme

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) sky
 * 2) heaven

title: alme


text:
vybreptat to

Phrase

 * 1) to let the cat out of the bag

Usage notes

 * Implies revealing a secret because of talking too much and/or too carelessly.

title: vybreptat to


text:
vybreptat

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to blab something out

title: vybreptat


text:
jednomyslně

Adverb

 * 1) unanimously

title: jednomyslně


text:
breptat

Verb

 * 1) to gabble
 * 2) to jabber

title: breptat


text:
leig mu sgaoil e

Verb

 * 1)  let the cat out of the bag

title: leig mu sgaoil e


text:
leig mu sgaoil

Verb

 * 1) release, liberate, set free

title: leig mu sgaoil


text:
fossilis

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) Retrieved from the earth, dug out, dug up, unearthed; fossil.

title: fossilis


text:
barbarisk

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) barbarian, barbaric, barbarous

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) barbarian, barbaric, barbarous

Adjective

 * 1) barbaric; relating to people, countries or customs perceived as uncivilized or inferior

title: barbarisk


text:
MediaWiki:Geonotice.js

// var notices = { /******************************************* *            End of list. *          Edit only above! * * Format is: * * ID: * { begin: 'date', *  corners: [ [lat,lon], [lat,lon] ], *  text: 'message' * } * * There should be a commas between the notices, but not after the last one. * *******************************************/ }

if (typeof geoip != 'undefined') {

var now = new Date;

for (var id in notices) {

if (!document.cookie.match('hidegeonotice'+id+'=1')) {

var notice = notices[id]; var minlat = Math.min(notice.corners[0][0], notice.corners[1][0]); var maxlat = Math.max(notice.corners[0][0], notice.corners[1][0]); var minlon = Math.min(notice.corners[0][1], notice.corners[1][1]); var maxlon = Math.max(notice.corners[0][1], notice.corners[1][1]);

if ( now.getTime > Date.parse(notice.begin)          && minlat < geoip.latitude && geoip.latitude < maxlat           && minlon < geoip.longitude && geoip.longitude < maxlon         ) {

insertsub = document.getElementById('contentSub'); insertsub.innerHTML += ''+notice.text+' [hide] ';

}

} } }

title: MediaWiki:Geonotice.js


text: tunnaig

title: tunnaig


text:
User talk:Kasmil

Translations
Hi when adding translations please note that you can add multiple translations at once before saving; just type in the first translation, click the button to add it and then repeat the process as many times as you need to and finally click to save it when you are ready. This helps as it means there are less edits for the server to process. 50 Xylophone Players talk 20:27, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Duplicate translations
I have removed a few duplicate Swahili entries. I hadn't looked to see if they are all yours, but the last one was. It seems to be all too easy to make duplicate entries without realizing it. It happened to one person who was able to correct the problem. If you check your entries when the entry process isn't smooth, you might be able to figure out what makes it happen and either avoid or correct it. Happy translating! DCDuring TALK 21:32, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

 * Still more duplicates from today. Can you fix this please? DCDuring TALK 23:59, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Swahili translations
Hi,

Please add Swahili translations for Moscow and Russia. Anatoli 03:52, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kasmil


text: Appalachi

title: Appalachi