text:
overname

Verb

 * 1)  To name over or in a series; to recount.
 * 2) * The Merchant of Venice Act I, line 37:
 * PORTIA: I pray thee, overname them, and as thou namest them I will describe them...

Noun

 * 1) A surname.
 * 2) A nickname.

Etymology 1
Derived from by calqueing. The same is true of other nouns in. Equivalent to.

title: overname


text: overnames

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: overnames


text:
Procrustean assignment

Etymology
After the legendary highwayman Procrustes, who stretched or cut his victims to make them fit a bed.

Noun

 * 1)  A form of assignment to fixed-length string variables in which a shorter value is padded to the necessary length while a longer one is truncated.

title: Procrustean assignment


text:
prestigieus

Etymology
Borrowed from. Equivalent to.

Adjective

 * 1) prestigious

title: prestigieus


text:
onderwijskundig

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) educational

title: onderwijskundig


text:
seekable

Adjective

 * 1) Capable of being sought.
 * 2)  Through which one can seek back and forth; not purely sequential.

title: seekable


text:
bannfæra

Verb

 * 1) to excommunicate

title: bannfæra


text:
functionalistically

Adverb

 * 1) In a functionalistic manner.

Translations

 * Finnish: funktionalistisesti

title: functionalistically


text:
functionalistic

Adjective

 * 1) Pertaining to functionalism.

Translations

 * Finnish:

title: functionalistic


text:
User:Sbharris

This is my userpage on Wiktionary. See user:Sbharris on English Wikipedia (en.wiki)

title: User:Sbharris


text: rebellie

title: rebellie


text: rebellieën

title: rebellieën


text:
unseekable

Adjective

 * 1) Not seekable.

title: unseekable


text:
loopless

Adjective

 * 1) Without loops.

title: loopless


text: strenger

title: strenger


text: strengst

title: strengst


text: wilinesses

title: wilinesses


text:
exonymic

Adjective

 * 1) Being or pertaining to an exonym.

title: exonymic


text: Rhymes:Icelandic/ɔsːɪ

title: Rhymes:Icelandic/ɔsːɪ


text: bestraf

title: bestraf


text: bestraft

title: bestraft


text: bestrafte

title: bestrafte


text:
keyphrase

Noun

 * 1)  A phrase used in encryption as a, like a single   would be:.
 * 2)  A phrase of relative importance in a text, acting like a  (important term) or a combination of several thereof.

title: keyphrase


text: bestraften

title: bestraften


text: keyphrases

title: keyphrases


text: bestraffend

title: bestraffend


text: bestraffende

title: bestraffende


text: sex shops

title: sex shops


text: sex drives

title: sex drives


text: sex organs

title: sex organs


text: sex machines

title: sex machines


text: sex tapes

title: sex tapes


text: straft

title: straft


text: sex toys

title: sex toys


text: strafte

title: strafte


text: sex workers

title: sex workers


text: straften

title: straften


text: gestraft

title: gestraft


text: sexdecillions

title: sexdecillions


text: straffend

title: straffend


text:
sexologically

Adverb

 * 1) In terms of sexology.

title: sexologically


text: straffende

title: straffende


text: sexologies

title: sexologies


text:
Talk:sexyer

Not that common, is it? Equinox ◑ 03:07, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:sexyer


text: sexy primes

title: sexy primes


text:
stout-hearted

Translations

 * Dutch:
 * Irish: móruchtúil

title: stout-hearted


text: bezat

title: bezat


text: bezaten

title: bezaten


text:
bezeten

Etymology
From. Part participle of.

Adjective

 * 1) (magically or demonically) possessed
 * 2) obsessed.
 * 1) obsessed.

title: bezeten


text:
Rhymes:Icelandic/ouːrɪ

Two syllables

 * bóri
 * Dóri
 * hóri
 * klóri
 * ljóri
 * móri
 * Óri
 * slóri
 * stjóri
 * stóri
 * tóri
 * þjóri

title: Rhymes:Icelandic/ouːrɪ


text: bezittend

title: bezittend


text: bezittende

title: bezittende


text:
subframe

Noun

 * 1) A subsidiary frame chunk of data.
 * 2) A structural component of a vehicle, such as an automobile or aircraft, that uses a discrete, separate structure within a larger body-on-frame or unit body to carry certain components, such as the engine, drivetrain, or suspension.
 * 3)  One of the HTML frames that make up a frameset.
 * 1)  One of the HTML frames that make up a frameset.

title: subframe


text: subframes

title: subframes


text:
Talk:bonus

Boni
Boni is not the proper plural form of bonuses in english or latin. It is not the duty of this site to create new words to accommodate improper usage. If and only if boni becomes a commonly used alternative should it be included, otherwise it's just a typo or improper usage at best.

Please stop adding it.

Previous deletion
I think if there was some rubbish in the talk page, it can be blanked out or the sentence(s) removed, that way, if you need to talk about the actual entry, you don't need to recreate deleted items. Please correct me if I am wrong.

Otherwise, add more translations and check existing, please. Anatoli 03:12, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Adjective
Bonus is also used as an adjective. Consider the statement, "I was playing pinball and I earned bonus points." Bonus is describing the noun in the direct object, "points", and would thus be an adjective, or am I missing something?
 * Virtually every sense of every noun in English can be used attributively as in the example above. If dictionaries had entries that simply repeated each sense of every noun reworded as a definition of an adjective, they would be longer without really adding to the users' understanding. If a word that is originally a noun develops in adjectival a sense that is distinct we would add that distinct sense to an adjective section. If such a word is used as a predicate: "Those points are bonus." rather than "Those points are a bonus.", it would be evidence of the word being an adjective. Gradability ("very bonus") and comparability ("more bonus than") are also evidence. If you can find such evidence that meets WT:Attestation, we would be happy to show the usage, even if it is rare in durably archived sources. DCDuring TALK 12:14, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

A bribe?
Chambers 1908 defines bonus as "a douceur or bribe", which interests me because we no longer use the word to describe any sort of criminally dubious money: it's now associated with promotions at work etc. Equinox ◑ 23:09, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Boni as the plural Form in English?
While Bonuses is certainly the most orthodox pluralization I feel Boni isn’t unheard of and should be mentioned as an alternative, if uncommon, form. Fritz1776 (talk) 19:32, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

title: Talk:bonus


text:
opstanden

Etymology
An old past participle of the verb used primarily in a religious context (else, modern Danish uses the form ).

Adjective

 * 1) risen from the dead

title: opstanden


text: tomans

title: tomans


text: opstandje

title: opstandje


text: bonusing

title: bonusing


text: bonused

title: bonused


text:
shoelessly

Adverb

 * 1) Without shoes.

title: shoelessly


text: Rhymes:Icelandic/iːrɪ

title: Rhymes:Icelandic/iːrɪ


text:
onvoldoende

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) insufficient, not enough
 * 2) failing

Noun

 * 1) failing grade

title: onvoldoende


text:
superessentially

Adverb

 * 1) In a superessential way.

title: superessentially


text:
User talk:68.48.94.61

-Atelaes λάλει ἐμοί 03:29, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

 * Here's the link to the previous discussion, if you're interested. -Atelaes λάλει ἐμοί 03:31, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

title: User talk:68.48.94.61


text: onvoldoenden

title: onvoldoenden


text:
struct

Etymology
Abbreviation of, used as a keyword in the C programming language and its descendants.

Noun

 * 1)  A data structure, especially one that serves to group a number of fields (in contrast to an object-oriented class with methods)  or one that is passed by value rather than by reference.

Translations

 * Chinese:
 * Mandarin:
 * Finnish:
 * French:
 * German: ,
 * Japanese: 構造体
 * Russian:

title: struct


text: structs

title: structs


text:
apendicitis

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) appendicitis

title: apendicitis


text:
moreness

Noun

 * 1)  The state or condition of being more.

title: moreness


text:
retoriek

Etymology
From, from , feminine form of , from. .

title: retoriek


text:
farmacológico

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) pharmacological relating to pharmacology

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) pharmacological

title: farmacológico


text: retorica's

title: retorica's


text:
trailerlike

Adjective

 * 1) Resembling a trailer (towable vehicle sometimes used as a dwelling).

title: trailerlike


text:
towable

Adjective

 * 1) That can be towed.

Noun

 * 1) Something suitable for being towed.

title: towable


text: scriptoriums

title: scriptoriums


text:
overdoen

Etymology 1
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to do over, to do again
 * 2)  to transfer, to sell

Etymology 2
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to cover with a layer of paint
 * 2)  to overdo, to tire out
 * 3)  to dominate, to subjugate

title: overdoen


text:
ingestión

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) ingestion

title: ingestión


text:
sopar

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to dine, have dinner have one's evening meal

Noun

 * 1) dinner; tea evening meal

Noun

 * 1) dinner; tea evening meal

Verb

 * 1) to dine have one's evening meal

Verb

 * 1) to make soup

title: sopar


text:
onderkennen

Verb

 * 1) to be aware of, to understand the importance of

title: onderkennen


text:
thereinbefore

Adverb

 * 1)  In a preceding part of that (speech, book, etc.); before that.

title: thereinbefore


text: recogniser

title: recogniser


text: recognisers

title: recognisers


text:
do one's nut

Verb

 * 1)  To become stridently angry, especially from worry.
 * Mum did her nut after we stayed out all night without calling her.

title: do one's nut


text:
whereinbefore

Conjunction

 * 1) In which, before; in which (speech, book, etc.) occurred earlier.

title: whereinbefore


text: vat samen

title: vat samen


text: samenvat

title: samenvat


text: vatte samen

title: vatte samen


text: samenvatte

title: samenvatte


text: able seamen

title: able seamen


text: vatten samen

title: vatten samen


text: samengevat

title: samengevat


text: samenvattend

title: samenvattend


text:
disablism

Etymology
, patterned on, , etc.

Noun

 * 1) Ableism: discrimination against the disabled.

title: disablism


text: samenvattende

title: samenvattende


text:
paper shop

Noun

 * 1)  A newsagency; a shop that sells newspapers and often other goods such as sweets and cigarettes.

title: paper shop


text: paper shops

title: paper shops


text: lounge lizards

title: lounge lizards


text:
clairsentience

Etymology
From late 17th century +.

Noun

 * 1) The psychic ability for a person to acquire knowledge by means of feeling.

title: clairsentience


text: prestigieuze

title: prestigieuze


text:
endonormative

Adjective

 * 1)  (Of a language variety) using a local form as the standard or norm.

title: endonormative


text:
exonormative

Adjective

 * 1)  (Of a language variety) using a non-local form as the standard or norm.

title: exonormative


text:
prestigiousness

Noun

 * 1) The state or condition of being prestigious.

title: prestigiousness


text:
mushroomy

Adjective

 * 1) Resembling or characteristic of mushrooms.
 * the mushroomy smell of the old cellar
 * 1) Flavoured with mushrooms.
 * 1) Flavoured with mushrooms.

title: mushroomy


text:
clairalience

Etymology
From late 17th century +.

Noun

 * 1) the ability to acquire psychic knowledge by means of smelling.

title: clairalience


text:
claircognizance

Etymology
Presumably from late 17th century 🇰🇲.

Noun

 * 1) The ability for a person to acquire psychic knowledge without knowing how or why they knew it.

title: claircognizance


text: hyperellipses

title: hyperellipses


text:
hyperopically

Adverb

 * 1) In a hyperopic way.

title: hyperopically


text: Wiktionary:Word of the day/Archive/2009/April


text:
shedrow

Noun

 * 1) A row of sheds; especially, a row of barns for horses at the start of a race track.

title: shedrow


text: shedrows

title: shedrows


text:
bihemisphered

Adjective

 * 1) Divided into two sections or hemispheres.

title: bihemisphered


text: cachers

title: cachers


text: päästäisin

title: päästäisin


text:
paczki

Etymology
, plural form of.

Noun

 * 1) A traditional Polish doughnut.

Translations

 * Chinese:
 * Mandarin:波兰甜甜圈
 * Japanese: ポンチキ
 * Polish:

title: paczki


text:
curtainless

Adjective

 * 1) Without curtains.

title: curtainless


text:
uncurtained

Adjective

 * 1) Without curtains.

title: uncurtained


text:
coterminously

Adverb

 * 1) In a coterminous manner; ending together.

title: coterminously


text:
User talk:Chzz

Not here I'm on the English Wikipedia; please leave all messages etc. at w:user talk:Chzz  Chzz  ►

Not Wikipedia
Hello, please be cautious copying things such as templates from Wikipedia. Sometimes we have the templates under another name, or sometimes the Wikipedia templates are based on other templates that we don't have. For example your link to displays Tagalog, not template. Mglovesfun (talk) 15:16, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

 * Oops, yes, I missed those bits, thanks. 17:12, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

your Chinese entries
Hi, thanks for your Mandarin contributions. Amongst other things, there are two main problems with your entries though: 1. you aren't including the rs (radical/stroke) value and 2. you aren't adding sorting information in the category tags (see the mess here: Category:zh-cn:English surnames). Note my changes at 奥古斯丁. See also How to Create a Basic Chinese Entry. If you have any questions, feel free to leave them on my talk page. Cheers. ---> Tooironic 23:52, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

 * Hi.

1. Yes, I do not know how to calculate the number of strokes, easily; that is somewhat beyond my knowledge; is there some way in which I can designate that? Or that I can note the info needs to be added?

2. Again, similarly, I do not know how to add the specific change; I just wanted to help get the basic entry; is there something I could do, to make it better? Thanks, Chzz 04:20, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

 * I was basically adding the trans-wiki stuff on these names as best I couldn because after asking for help from many, I didn't know a better way;

 * If you can tell me how do do it better, or help me, please do. Cheers, Chzz 05:19, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

 * All the relevant information can be found at How to Create a Basic Chinese Entry. Have a good read and you shouldn't have any more issues. ---> Tooironic 10:27, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

 * Hi. A hint for you. The rs value can now be looked up from the existing word or character entries, which start with the same character. Remember to look up both if the first character is different in traditional/simplified. --Anatoli 11:59, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Both,

I appreciate what you are asking here, but all I am trying to do is, get over this info that came from an en wikipedia page, into some kind of appropriate format; it all appears to be valid for Wiktionary, and I can make the basic entries as you've seen...is it imperative that I find the stroke count for each one? Because, as I explained, that goes somewhat beyond my knowledge. The entries seem to meet Wiktionary inclusion requirements, so, I ask again; can I create the entries without my knowing the stroke count... for later improvement by others?

Thanks, Chzz 23:29, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

 * Stroke count is one of the things that put me off at the beginning as well. It is not an issue since there character entries where the value can be looked up. Each language has specific entry rules, which supplement the basic inclusion criteria. Entries without stroke count will be substandard. Of course, they can be fixed but it's creating extra work. In my preference, it's beter to create less entries but they all should meet the criteria, rather than more substandard entries. Your entry 巴比特 starts with 巴, the rs value (己01) can be looked up in 巴拉克 or 巴 itself. Do you need a walkthrough to help you look up stroke count values? --Anatoli 00:26, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

 * Thanks for replying.

 * No, I don't need a walkthrough - I do understand it. It's just that I want to make some 800 entries, and I don't know if I will bother with it, if I have to look each one up. But, fair enough; I do understand.

 * I suppose my question is: if I am too 'lazy' to look up each of the 800 entries to get the stroke count, is it better if I simply do not bother to create them at all? Chzz 17:36, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

 * My own opinion is no, quality is more important than quantity but I can't stop you working and I am not the only one to decide, please check with other contributors and you may discuss it in the beer parlour. In any case, incomplete entries are better flagged with . --Anatoli 03:27, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

 * Oh, that's fair enough, and I do understand. I just wonder about how extremely difficult it has become for people to contribute to Wiktionary. I'm an very experienced English Wikipedian, and I've been trying very very hard to bring this information across... the data was originally an English Wikipedia 'Article for creation' - declined, and I thought it might be useful to wikt. I spoke to wikt users in IRC, and was advised to 'trans-wiki' - I flagged it for that, but the tags were removed several times; I monitered it, and have managed to sort that out. After many months, it was still not trans-wiki'd so I read up the instructions, followed them, and did the trans-wiki myself; I was then told that was incorrect, and someone did it via 'special:import' instead - which is fine; better (although the instructions do say that you can do it manually).

 * Since then, I've been trying to write the entries, as best I can, but I seem to keep hitting these immense hurdles.

 * Frankly, I'm amazed any new users come to Wiktionary; given that with my own knowledge of wikis, my experience and my persistence, I have still had immense difficulty in simply trying to improve this project.

 * Anyway - I will persist further.

 * I have just made 鲍德温. Hopefully I have successfully added the stroke information. Please could you check it, and let me know if that one is acceptable; if so, I will try to create the others.

 * Thanks, Chzz 15:18, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

 * Quite a few changes. The transliteration was simply wrong. Do you know any Chinese or was it just carelessness? Words, which have a traditional spelling are created differently from those where there is no variant. This is my edit. --Anatoli 23:00, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

 * OK, fair enough. No, I do not know Chinese; I was simply trying to bring in what I thought would be simple info, from the imported article - but, seems too difficult. The user originally added it on English Wikipedia; though it didn't fit with our remit there, I thought it suited wikt (and was told so), but this is all just too hard. I do understand what you are saying; it is just unfortunate that the basic, simple entries for this apparently encycloapedic information cannot be made, but if I can't, I can't. Chzz 03:35, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

 * Thanks for understanding. The foreign language contributors in Wiktionary are native speakers, advanced learners or just language enthusiasts. Whatever you are, the entries should provide the accurate information. Some work by learning from others. Just importing entries doesn't add much value. You seem to be interested in transliteration of English personal names. The value in such entries is not high, IMHO. I was referring to simplified/traditional Chinese characters difference before, like 鲍德温 (simplified) in mainland China has 鮑德溫 (traditional) variant, used in Taiwan. --Anatoli 04:20, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

 * With respect, I think you have not understood the background here;

 * In early May 2010, a new user contributed a suggested "Article for creation" to the English Wikipedia: w:Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Western names in Chinese.

 * It was not appropriate for inclusion in that wiki, and we discussed that with the author. Clearly, they were well-intentioned, and wanted to contribute this information freely.

 * I wondered if it would be appropriate for Wiktionary; I checked Wikt policies, and spoke with several Wikt users, who all agreed it would be, and suggested tagging it for trans-wiki, which was done.

 * The trans-wiki did not happen, and the tag was removed several times by a bot, then by a user; fortunately, I kept checking back, and reinstated the tag (after speaking to the bot owner  and then the user ).

 * Months passed, and nothing happened, so in the spirit of boldly trying to help, I checked the instructions in Meta:Help:Transwiki, and did it myself, according to that guide. I was told this was not correct, so it was re-done via special:import; see User_talk:Mglovesfun.

 * Then, I have been trying in good faith to create the valid, appropriate entries. I've listened carefully to what has been said, and tried my very best to accommodate requirements.

 * I am frustrated and disappointed that my considerable good-faith efforts to improve this project, by adding information which seems within-scope and potentially beneficial to many people, has been dealt with in this manner.

 * I do understand the need for well-written entries, but I seriously question the principle here; unless I massively misunderstand the basic ethos of Wiktionary, then this seems extraordinarily bureaucratic, negative and off-putting to new users.

 * Please note, I say the above with all the best of intentions - I hope it might help others, in the future, if this can be considered. Chzz 15:42, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

 * I don't understand what the big issue is; you merely need to use the correct template when creating Mandarin entries. Wikipedia has its own formatting standards, as does Wiktionary. ---> Tooironic 22:59, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

 * What do you mean by 'the correct template'? Given the source information (which I explained above), exactly what should I use? Unless I am expected to learn Chinese, I fail to see what more I can do, to accommodate the requirements.Chzz 03:54, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

 * You can save your translations in an Appendix, like this one. As your translations only show the simplified Chinese, the titles should state so, e.g. Appendix:Western names in simplified Chinese (can be renamed later if it has both). I will check for accuracy, if you decide so. If you don't know Chinese at all, then how do you guarantee the accuracy? I found wrong transliteration in the first example you gave me. --Anatoli 04:34, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

 * This is the correct template - How to Create a Basic Chinese Entry. But if you don't actually speak the language I wouldn't recommend you contribute in it. ---> Tooironic 12:19, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

title: User talk:Chzz


text:
User:Visviva/Herald Sun 20090330

2009-03-30

 * 1) beachworms
 * 2) blurters: missing sense?
 * 3) sidecast
 * 4) threadline
 * 5) yahooing
 * 1) threadline
 * 2) yahooing
 * 1) yahooing
 * 1) yahooing

Sequestered

 * 1) freightliner

title: User:Visviva/Herald Sun 20090330


text:
User:Visviva/Herald Sun 20090329

2009-03-29

 * 1) checkpost
 * 2) doosie
 * 3) sportsgrounds
 * 1) sportsgrounds
 * 1) sportsgrounds

title: User:Visviva/Herald Sun 20090329


text:
User:Visviva/Toronto Star 20090330

2009-03-30

 * 1) comearound
 * 2) premierial
 * 1) premierial

title: User:Visviva/Toronto Star 20090330


text:
superalcolico

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1)  high-proof, strong

Noun

 * 1)  hard drink, hard liquor, spirit

title: superalcolico


text:
supersfida

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  big match

title: supersfida


text:
taroccare

Verb

 * 1)  to respond with a tarot card
 * 2)  to falsify, to counterfeit (a product)
 * 3)  to quarrel, to vituperate
 * 1)  to quarrel, to vituperate

title: taroccare


text:
stabler

Noun

 * 1) A stablekeeper.

title: stabler


text:
taroccato

Adjective

 * 1)  fake

title: taroccato


text:
tracciatura

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) tracing, sketching, drawing
 * 2) tracking

title: tracciatura


text:
ubiquo

Etymology

 * alternatively, from.

Adjective

 * 1)  ubiquitous

title: ubiquo


text:
velenosamente

Etymology
From.

Adverb

 * 1) poisonously
 * 2) acrimoniously, sharply, bitterly

title: velenosamente


text:
velista

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) sailor, yachtsman

title: velista


text:
vistosità

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) showiness, loudness, gaudiness

title: vistosità


text:
vitellino

Etymology 1
From.

Etymology 2
From.

Adjective

 * 1)  vitelline

title: vitellino


text:
accudimento

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) care
 * 2) nursing

title: accudimento


text: anahtarı

title: anahtarı


text:
ambosessi

Adjective

 * 1) of either sex; male or female

Noun

 * 1) person of either sex; male or female

Usage notes

 * Mainly used in advertisements.

title: ambosessi


text: anahtarlar

title: anahtarlar


text:
artigianalità

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) craftsmanship

title: artigianalità


text:
bachelite

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) Bakelite

title: bachelite


text:
battage

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) hype, publicity

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) buildup campaign
 * 2) hype

title: battage


text:
Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2009-03/Removing vote requirements for policy changes

Removing vote requirements for policy changes

 * Voting on:
 * That the wording of Template:policy be changed from "It should not be modified without a VOTE" to "It should not be modified without discussion and consensus. Any substantial or contested changes require a VOTE."

Let's face it folks, our policy documents are generally out of date. I can't count the number of times that I've had to tell a new contributor, "Well, even if it's not written down anywhere, it's still policy." This is both confusing and frustrating, especially for new editors. This vote is an attempt to remove one of the greatest hurdles to keeping our policy documents up to date with current practice. In short, it means that people can make edits to policy documents like WT:ELE and WT:CFI without a vote. However, if there is disagreement (probably often taking the form of a rollback of the edits), then the issue is taken to the Beer parlour. If a strong consensus is achieved, then the changes become no longer "contested" and can be remade. This does not entirely do away with votes, as they will still be useful in contentious situations, and will be especially important in major switches of policy. However, it does allow us to cut through a lot of red tape to align official policy with de facto policy. Props to Visviva for making the initial BP proposal of this. -Atelaes λάλει ἐμοί 06:15, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

 * Vote ends: 23:59 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Vote started: 6:15 31 March 2009 (UTC)

 * Vote created: -Atelaes λάλει ἐμοί 06:15, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Discussion:
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] WT:BP

Support

 * 1) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support -Atelaes λάλει ἐμοί 06:15, 31 March 2009 (UTC) (as nominator)
 * 2) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support Visviva 06:27, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support Neskaya  kanetsv  06:35, 31 March 2009 (UTC) Much needed. --Neskaya  kanetsv  06:35, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support Bequw → ¢ • τ 06:50, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * 5) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support —Michael Z. 2009-03-31 08:03 z
 * 6) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support Eivind (t) 08:31, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * 7) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support †  ﴾(u):Raifʻhār (t):Doremítzwr﴿ 13:20, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * 8) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support Conrad.Irwin 16:44, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * 9) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Strong support —Ruakh TALK 23:03, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * 10) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support —Rod (A. Smith) 04:18, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 11) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Strong support DAVilla 19:03, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 12) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support EncycloPetey 04:19, 9 April 2009 (UTC) I have some reservation about doing this, but currently think the overall benefits outweigh the possible negative outcomes. --EncycloPetey 04:19, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 13) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support Dominic·t 05:54, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 14) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support — [ ric ] opiaterein — 17:33, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 15) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support; it is better to require visible opposition to a change to prompt a vote, rather than forcing each change to be held for a month even if it is uncontroversial.  However, many changes are tricky, and it shouldn't be considered that this will magically make coming up with and clarifying these changes easy. JesseW 05:23, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 16) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support Jackofclubs 08:01, 29 April 2009 (UTC).

Oppose

 * 1) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose Robert Ullmann 11:24, 5 April 2009 (UTC) very strongly oppose and I would ask everyone above to reconsider this very seriously
 * The voting process is not onerous; it takes only a few minutes to set, and a proper amount of time to specify the change. If you are not willing to take this degree of time and care, you should not be editing policy documents.
 * The voting process exists to document the consensus resulting from proper proposal and discussion. If that has in fact occurred (the premise of the proposal) then a vote is simple. If it has not, then a vote becomes problematic. If you are having trouble bringing something to a vote, it means that you haven't gotten the needed consensus. (Or that you don't really understand what you are doing.) The problem is not the voting process, and the premise above that there has been sufficient debate has not been met. Making an end run around the voting process to make what is then almost certainly an ill-advised change to ELE or another policy document is not a solution.
 * There have been several frustrated attempts recently to propose changes. In each case the problem was not the requirement for a vote, but the requirement that the change(s) be properly discussed (before any vote), be coherent and understood. And: not be very bad changes. The voting process is not the problem.
 * If passed, this will result in a devolved state of affairs in which every change to ELE or another policy document is immediately met with a revert and a demand for a vote. Why? Because in any case in which consensus has been achieved (the premise above), a vote is simple and easy. The procedure described in this proposal is only useful when someone wants to pretend that consensus has been achieved when it has not and try to force a change. Very simply, if the premise of the proposal above has been met, voting is not a problem; the only possible purpose and use of the proposal is to evade a vote that would and should fail. Robert Ullmann 11:24, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Two more points:
 * All policy does not have to be crammed into (e.g.) WT:ELE. It is too big already, and it is is simple to create other pages that describe something in detail, without having to have a vote or anything (until eventually making them full policy). So the argument that voting gets in the way of writing things down is completely invalid.
 * When someone considers some "minor" change to be not "substantiative", the probability that it is in fact minor and does not seriously break something is a close approximation to zero. (-) Robert Ullmann 11:31, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * You make excellent points. The problem is that votes take forever, and that (with all apologies) people vote "oppose" for bad reasons — things like "yes, these changes are good, but they don't cover some case that isn't covered currently, either." Atelaes and Visviva's proposal solves this issue by removing any expectation that the voted-on proposal be perfect. Another problem is that people vote "oppose" for minor issues of wording; in theory, the process of discussion should resolve that, but in practice, there seem to be a lot of editors who don't scrutinize the wording carefully until the vote has begun, at which point they object. (It's totally understandable — who wants to spend time reading each new draft of a vote? — but it's unfortunate.) Atelaes and Visviva's proposal solves this issue by allowing wording to continue to be tweaked, as long as there continues to be consensus. And all these problems deter people from starting any votes, even ones that appear (in BP discussion) to be unobjectionable. Of course, the current proposal doesn't solve the biggest problem, which is that ELE and CFI aren't actually policy at all, but rather a poor approximation to policy, such that requiring >75–80% consensus doesn't work (there's no stance that has anywhere near 75–80% consensus, at least none that's as detailed as CFI and ELE currently are); but I don't have a solution to that problem, and apparently Atelaes and Visviva don't, either.  —Ruakh TALK 21:57, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * God, I hate the indentation here.
 * A change can be minor in one sense and not in another. Misspellings are minor, but they are also very obviously wrong. Over time examples can become outdated, for instance if a word was thought to have a single etymology and is discovered to have two, or if a dated term becomes archaic, or if a brand name becomes genericized. In such cases another example that illustrates exactly the same point is minor in that it doesn't change the meaning, but significant in that it keeps the documentation valid and current. There are improvements to explanation that do not require a change in intention. Remember that we used to have some stupid word "hruck" or something as an example? I don't think that was ever voted off, it just got changed through wiki collaboration.
 * If the proposed changes you mention were the substantial ones that come to my mind, then they would not be affected by this vote, because all changes would need to be discussed, and substantial changes would still need to be voted on. DAVilla 21:38, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I alert you attention to this edit which you made just 10 days into your "very strong oppose" vote and which occurred without discussion that I was aware of and certainly without any vote. DAVilla 08:46, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose --Duncan 22:11, 5 April 2009 (UTC) (After editing conflict, but somehow I found I don't have to do much rewording). The phrasing "It should not be modified without discussion and consensus. Any substantial or contested changes require a VOTE." is so vague that it can be interpreted in whichever way whoever likes to. And anyway the current wording uses the expression should not, rather than must not, so I can't see how any de facto policy, if rewritten into eg ELE, would meet a rollback. And even if it did, so much the better for bringing about a discussion on why we claim one thing and keep doing another. --Duncan 22:11, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Weak oppose per RU.—msh210  ℠  20:03, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose — Carolina wren discussió  19:21, 9 April 2009 (UTC) I'm not sanguine about this because it encourages a "shoot first ask questions later" philosophy inappropriate for policy changes.  I'm all for eliminating the need to VOTE on minor changes, but I'd much prefer that they be brought first to the Beer Parlor and then implemented, rather than the other way round. — Carolina wren discussió  19:21, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * In fairness, the policy promotes BP discussion if anyone disagrees with the edit (which will probably be fairly often). -Atelaes λάλει ἐμοί 19:43, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Policy documents shouldn't be the scene of edit skirmishes, that's what BP is there to smooth out, so I strongly prefer an "ask questions first then shoot" type policy. I understand the frustration of our current policy of "file a requisition in triplicate for the bullets and then wait for them to be delivered from the supply dump before shooting", but this proposed change goes too far in the other direction. — Carolina wren discussió 20:41, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, I don't think anyone wants to see edit wars on CFI. Perhaps the wording should be "It should not be modified without discussion and consensus?" :P  Bear in mind that the vote is on the wording initially proposed, not my interpretation of it.  -Atelaes λάλει ἐμοί 21:09, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Right now the process is more like "ask questions first, get no answer, then get shot when you make the change". Admins don't rely on the policy pages as much as other users, only when it comes down to a dispute, but not as a reference on the side for creating entries. The information gets out of date, and the people most eager to make changes are the ones least trusted to do so. DAVilla 03:08, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose Nadando 03:20, 10 April 2009 (UTC), as per Robert Ullmann. Nadando 03:20, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose DCDuring TALK 01:40, 11 April 2009 (UTC) per RU. DCDuring TALK 01:40, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose per Robert Ullmann. The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 22:24, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose per Robert Ullmann. The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 22:24, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Abstain

 * 1) [[Image:Symbol abstain vote.svg|20px]] Abstain Dan Polansky 06:22, 6 April 2009 (UTC) A note on wording: re: "Any substantial or contested changes require a VOTE.". This I read as "Any change that is (a) substantial or (b) contested requires a VOTE." From this logically follows a weaker requirement that "If a change is substantial, then it requires a VOTE" (regardless of whether it is contested), which only slightly tweaks the current meta-policy, only allowing changes in formatting to be done without voting. If that was the intention, then fine. A substantial change to the current meta-policy would be "Any change that is substantial and contested requires a VOTE", or, put differently, "If a change is not substantial or it is uncontested, then it does not require a VOTE". --Dan Polansky 06:22, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * As intended. If a change is substantial, then we require a vote. We don't want people to go off rewriting policy pages on their own without presenting them first. DAVilla 21:14, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Then I don't understand the motivation for this vote, or I don't understand "substantial" in "substantial change". I quote: 'Let's face it folks, our policy documents are generally out of date. I can't count the number of times that I've had to tell a new contributor, "Well, even if it's not written down anywhere, it's still policy."' If any substantial change, disputed or not, requires a vote anyway, then the problem with policy documents easily getting out of date is not being addressed by the proposed change of the meta-policy. --Dan Polansky 10:15, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, one thing is that smaller things can be addressed without the rigors and time of a vote. Often all that is needed to keep a policy page up to date is small changes as practice incrementally changes.  -Atelaes λάλει ἐμοί 10:17, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I think I really misunderstand "substantial". I thought "substantial" meant a change in substance of what is being said. Thus, a semantically invariant rephrasing would not be substantial, while any change that has a real effect on how Wiktionary entries are formatted would be substantial. But from your response, I now infer that by substantial you mean major as contrasts to minor. Some examples would be helpful, I think. Like, is adding the template to WT:ELE considered substantial? And what would be an example of a change that is not substantial and thus not requiring a vote if undisputed? --Dan Polansky 10:30, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Certainly minor rewordings and grammatical fixes are minor, and if this vote passes, can be changed without a vote. Then again, I think we've always done things that way, contrary to officially stated policy.  I would argue that adding  to ELE would not be a substantial change at this point, because it is rather clearly the current practice.  Something that would clearly be a substantial change would be a change which sets a standard which does not exist in practice, or which differs from practice (such as the addition of numbered pronunciation headers, for example; this is done by some, and not done by others; there is no standard practice).  As for the boundary line between the two, I think that's something we're going to have to figure out as we go along.  This proposed change of this vote is to simply acknowledge that there might be some changes which don't require a vote.  The current wording allows absolutely nothing without a vote.  -Atelaes λάλει ἐμοί 10:46, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I think I understand better now. Still, your "I would argue that adding to ELE would not be a substantial change at this point, because it is rather clearly the current practice" makes me wonder, as whether a change of a policy document is major or minor, significant of insignificant, substantial or unsubstantial, is not driven by the state of current practice AFAICT. If a policy document is frozen, the current practice can drift arbitrarily far away from it. Thus, aligning a policy document with the current practice may require arbitrarily big changes to it. Put differently, if the current practice differs from the codified policy in a substantial way, then the required adjustment of the policy is substantial.
 * That said, I understand that the proposed wording at least creates a possibility for all kinds of changes being interepreted as not "substantial", and thus not requiring a vote, which was impossible before. It seems to me, though, that if by "substantial" is meant "differing from current practice", it would be better to replace the former with the latter in the wording of the meta-policy. --Dan Polansky 11:21, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The "or contested" bit was meant to be a sort of safety net, for helping to decide what's substantial and what's not. If someone reverts your edit, that's the best evidence that your change was substantial, which means you need to gain consensus, i.e. you need to start a BP convo and try and convince people to agree with your changes.  -Atelaes λάλει ἐμοί 12:16, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I would say that according to the proposed wording "It should not be modified without discussion and consensus." you should gain expressed consensus before making any, however unsubstantial, edit, shouldn't you? The only difference that I can see is that the edit could be agreed upon in, say, BP, without a further need for bringing it here to Votes. --Duncan 14:25, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, we don't have to be overly dogmatic about this. Take the  thing for example.  Even if we hadn't had an official "let's add  to ELE" BP discussion, if it's being consistently used by most editors, then clearly there has already been discussion and consensus (in fact, I remember when the BP was nothing but discussion about t).  If someone reverts you, then clearly we need to have that specific discussion.  Now, I want to make something clear here.  As far as I can tell, no one, not one single person, wants policy pages to become grounds for edit wars.  So, one revert stands, until significant progress in consensus has been made.  I think that, after a while of being able to modify policy pages without votes, experienced editors would know when a change requires discussion and when it doesn't.  -Atelaes λάλει ἐμοί 19:42, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Adding to ELE is not going to be a “controversial” change because it is clearly a current practice, as Atelaes says. (Someone reverting the page would indicate we might be wrong about that, but if it had to be voted on I feel it would easily pass.) As to whether the change would be “substantial”, I say no because it better exemplifies the description than the existing wikitext. That statement again borrows on the fact it is current practice.
 * Given that {t} was created with so much input in WT:BP as an intended standard, "discussion" could comprise just a statement on the talk page that an editor intends to update it, standing for a week with no response potentially. DAVilla 22:29, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Decision
(We have 16–7 (69.565%).)
 * Sadly, I'm pretty sure that's a fail (no consensus), at least by the standards used on Wikipedia, although I don't know if we've officially decided to accept those standards. Anyone is free to disagree with me on this.  -Atelaes λάλει ἐμοί 10:25, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

 * I disagree. Two thirds is the only number I've ever heard here. What are you thinking, three quarters? Way too strict. Seven tenths? Damn the decimal system, that's just too strange from a mathematical perspective. Five sevenths would be more harmonious (to borrow musical terms) though I somehow doubt that's been proposed. Yeah, even outside of the numbers it isn't all that cut and dry to say the least, but two thirds is what we would normally aim for. I'd prefer if someone who objected were kind enough to pass this though, so that it isn't contentious. User msh210 did say weak oppose, if 16-6.5 (71.111%) is any more convincing. DAVilla 08:23, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

 * This seems to be in the nature of a constitutional/rules change. In most institutions the requirement would normally be for more of a plurality than for substantive change. DCDuring TALK 10:13, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

 * I agree with DCDuring. I voted to oppose, so will not fail it at these numbers, but I think it fails.—msh210 ℠  15:15, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

 * Yeah, I wouldn't feel comfortable passing this with less than 70–75%. Robert's edit is telling, but doesn't actually invalidate his vote. —Ruakh TALK 21:15, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

 * Okay. Considering the gravity of the vote, I guess a higher standard like 3/4 isn't that out of line. DAVilla 06:05, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Vote fails 16–7-1. :-(  —Ruakh TALK 21:15, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

 * In case anyone was wondering, this was the source for numbers that I was using. It appears that 75% is consensus, less than 70% is not, and in between is a grey area.  We really ought to figure out what our own standards are, for future reference.  -Atelaes λάλει ἐμοί 19:04, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

 * Update: I've stricken my "fails" comment, in light of my remembering/realizing today that we never actually approved the current editing-is-forbidden text atop these documents, and a quick glance at the edit history of any of them suffices to show that said editing-is-forbidden attitude was never thoroughly accepted by the community, so it seems wrong that a more-than-two-thirds majority should be unable to overturn it. If someone else wants to close this as a "fails" vote, I do think there's justification for that (and obviously I won't revert you); but I've decided I'm not comfortable doing it myself. (See current BP discussion for more on this topic.) —Ruakh TALK 01:08, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Links to the BP discussion: Reverts at Wiktionary:Criteria for inclusion. with a "subchapter" at Moving on --Duncan 15:32, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Vote passes. At the time, 69.565% was debatable, and this vote never got closed; but since then we have passed votes — much more significant votes — with only two-thirds' support, so I'm hereby belatedly passing this. —Ruakh TALK 22:42, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

 * I'm unpassing this vote as it is being discussed at WT:RFDO. --Daniel 23:10, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
 * To try and please as many people as possible, I will declare this a no result, this vote has neither passed nor failed. Mglovesfun (talk) 11:42, 26 March 2012 (UTC)


text:
concentratissimo

Etymology
From.

title: concentratissimo


text:
hartslag

Etymology
Compound of.

Noun

 * 1) A heartbeat
 * 2) The heart rate, the rhythm of a beating heart
 * 3)  A moving force, 'engine'

title: hartslag


text:
kusser

Etymology
root of kussen 'to kiss' + -er

Noun

 * 1) A kisser, one who is kissing and/or versed in it

title: kusser


text: bagatellen

title: bagatellen


text:
bagatel

Etymology
From, from.

Noun

 * 1) bagatelle, trifle
 * 2) bagatelle a short piece of literature or of instrumental music, typically light or playful in character

Derived terms

 * ("trivial", "petty")
 * ("play down", "belittle")

Etymology
From, from , from the diminutive of.

Noun

 * 1) a negligible sum, a tiny amount
 * 2) trinket
 * 3) trifle, futility

title: bagatel


text:
sekoitus

Noun

 * 1) blend, mixture, admixture something produced by mixing
 * 2) mixture, medley, cocktail something consisting of diverse elements
 * 3) composite combination of separate elements
 * 1) composite combination of separate elements
 * 1) composite combination of separate elements

title: sekoitus


text:
kertyminen

Noun

 * 1) accumulation
 * 1) accumulation

title: kertyminen


text:
nostovoima

Noun

 * 1) lift upward force, such as the force that keeps aircraft aloft

title: nostovoima


text:
yhteydenpito

Noun

 * 1) communication
 * 2) liaison

title: yhteydenpito


text:
koostumus

Noun

 * 1) composition, constitution proportion of different parts to make a whole
 * 2) texture as in e.g. food

title: koostumus


text:
kokoonpuristuvuus

Noun

 * 1) compressibility

title: kokoonpuristuvuus


text:
kokoonpuristuva

Adjective

 * 1) compressible

title: kokoonpuristuva


text:
samankeskinen

Adjective

 * 1) concentric

title: samankeskinen


text:
yhteensopivuus

Noun

 * 1) compatibility

title: yhteensopivuus


text:
ristiriidaton

Adjective

 * 1) consistent, not contradictory

title: ristiriidaton


text:
poikkeutin

Noun

 * 1) deflector

title: poikkeutin


text:
poikkeama

Noun

 * 1) deviation, aberration state or result of having deviated, e.g. from a path or a procedure
 * 2) anomaly any event, big or small, out of the ordinary
 * 3)  deviation from the route
 * 4)  diversion, unscheduled landing unscheduled landing, possibly back to its departure airport, the cause of which is not severe enough to be an emergency landing
 * 5) aberration minor or temporary mental disorder
 * 6)  aberration convergence to different foci
 * 7)  aberration deviation from normal range
 * 8) deviation amount or extent deviated
 * 9)  deviation measure of difference between the observed value and the mean
 * 10)  deviation hortest distance between the center of the target and the point where a projectile hits or bursts
 * 11) deflection deviation of a needle
 * 1) deviation amount or extent deviated
 * 2)  deviation measure of difference between the observed value and the mean
 * 3)  deviation hortest distance between the center of the target and the point where a projectile hits or bursts
 * 4) deflection deviation of a needle
 * 1) deflection deviation of a needle

title: poikkeama


text:
vääristää

Verb

 * 1) to distort
 * 2) to deform
 * 3) to warp

title: vääristää


text:
kaavakuva

Noun

 * 1) diagram

title: kaavakuva


text:
luovuttaja

Noun

 * 1) One who surrenders, gives up.
 * 2) donor

title: luovuttaja


text:
annosmittari

Noun

 * 1) dosimeter

title: annosmittari


text:
sähköistää

Verb

 * 1)  to electrify

title: sähköistää


text:
elektroskooppi

Etymology
(see 🇨🇬).

Noun

 * 1) electroscope

title: elektroskooppi


text:
sähköstaattinen

Adjective

 * 1) electrostatic

title: sähköstaattinen


text:
desenlace

Etymology 1
, from +, perhaps a.

Noun

 * 1) outcome
 * 2)  dénouement conclusion or resolution of a plot
 * 3)  passing
 * 1)  passing
 * 1)  passing

title: desenlace


text:
yhtäläisesti

Adverb

 * 1) equally

title: yhtäläisesti


text:
samanarvoisuus

Noun

 * 1) equivalence

title: samanarvoisuus


text: chicleros

title: chicleros


text: desenlaces

title: desenlaces


text:
samanarvoinen

Adjective

 * 1) equivalent

title: samanarvoinen


text:
chiclero

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) of or pertaining to the chicle tree

Noun

 * 1)  a person who extracts gum from wild or cultivated trees

title: chiclero


text:
earthlit

Adjective

 * 1) lit by light reflected from the Earth

title: earthlit


text:
eremitic

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) Characteristic of a hermit

Translations

 * Catalan: eremític
 * French:
 * Galician: eremítico
 * German:
 * Italian: eremitico
 * Latin: anachōrēticus, erēmīticus
 * Portuguese: eremítico
 * Romanian:
 * Russian: ,
 * Spanish:
 * Swedish: eremitisk

Etymology
..

title: eremitic


text:
fuelwood

Noun

 * 1) wood grown or felled for use as commercial fuel

title: fuelwood


text: malpractices

title: malpractices


text:
mesmerisingly

Adverb

 * 1) In a mesmerising manner

title: mesmerisingly


text:
militance

Noun

 * 1)  The condition of being militant
 * 2)  A hostile or warlike act

Noun

 * 1) militancy,

title: militance


text:
plantsman

Noun

 * 1) An expert on the identification and cultivation of plants.

title: plantsman


text: videoclips

title: videoclips


text: Template:fo-conj-síggjast

title: Template:fo-conj-síggjast


text: hondureña

title: hondureña


text:
hospitalario

Etymology
From. .

Adjective

 * 1)  hospital
 * 2) hospitable
 * 1) hospitable

Noun

 * 1) one of the Knights Hospitaller

title: hospitalario


text:
síggjast

Etymology
Medio-passive form of.

Verb

 * 1) to be seen, to see each other, to be visible
 * 2) * vit síggjast!
 * see you!
 * 1) * einki sæst
 * nothing visible
 * 1) * síggjast eftir
 * to be left over

title: síggjast


text:
homónimo

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) homonymous

Noun

 * 1) homonym

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) homonymous
 * 2) self-titled album

Noun

 * 1) homonym

title: homónimo


text: homónima

title: homónima


text:
humanizar

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to humanize

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to humanize

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to humanize

title: humanizar


text:
mondongo

Etymology
Borrowed from.

Noun

 * 1) A Latin American soup made from tripe.

Etymology
Borrorowed from.

Noun

 * 1) tripe

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) guts

Etymology

 * perhaps an alteration of related with  and  from latin ; or itself perhaps of  origin.

Noun

 * 1) tripe
 * 2)  tripes and paunch

title: mondongo


text:
kleed

Etymology 1
From, from , from. Cognate with 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) cloth
 * 2)  long cloth garment, notably:
 * 3) formal robe
 * 4) female dress

title: kleed


text:
mazorca

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) cob (of corn)

title: mazorca


text:
manso

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1)  guy, chap, fellow
 * 2)  boyfriend
 * 1)  boyfriend

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) meek; tame

Etymology
From, from , from.

Adjective

 * 1)  tame mild and well-behaved
 * 2)  grafted; cultured
 * 3)  meek; gentle
 * 4)  mild; gentle
 * 1)  meek; gentle
 * 2)  mild; gentle
 * 1)  mild; gentle

Etymology 1
From, back-formed from.

Adjective

 * 1)  meek, tame

Etymology 2
, from, perfect passive participle of.

Noun

 * 1)  an amount of land (usually 12 jugerums) considered cultivable yearly by using two oxen or a single plough

Etymology
From, from.

Adjective

 * 1)  tame mild and well-behaved
 * 2)  meek; submissive following orders without protest
 * 3)  mild; gentle; tranquil

Etymology 1
, from.

Adjective

 * 1) tame, meek; not threatening

Noun

 * 1) bellwether the leading sheep, goat or res of a flock

Etymology 2
Possibly an alteration of.

Adjective

 * 1)  gigantic, big

Usage notes

 * Used before the noun in exclamatory phrases, sometimes preceded by an article

title: manso


text:
acetalico

Adjective

 * 1)  acetal; acetalic

title: acetalico


text:
acetalic

Adjective

 * 1)   Of or pertaining to an acetal.

Translations

 * Italian: acetalico
 * Polish:

title: acetalic


text: accountabilities

title: accountabilities


text:
aldeidico

Adjective

 * 1)  aldehydic

title: aldeidico


text:
leucocidin

Noun

 * 1)  Any staphylococcal or streptococcal exotoxin that causes leucocyte killing or lysis.

title: leucocidin


text:
aldoesoso

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  aldohexose

title: aldoesoso


text: leucocidins

title: leucocidins


text:
agentuuri

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) agency office or place of business of an agent
 * 2) agency relation between a principal and his agent

title: agentuuri


text:
aldopentoso

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  aldopentose

title: aldopentoso


text:
aldotrioso

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  aldotriose

title: aldotrioso


text: endometroid

title: endometroid


text:
aldotetroso

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  aldotetrose

title: aldotetroso


text:
analysaattori

Etymology
(see 🇨🇬).

Noun

 * 1) analyzer instrument

title: analysaattori


text:
гъынчыльа

Noun

 * 1) January

Related terms

 * Previous: . Next:

title: гъынчыльа


text:
aldoso

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  aldose

title: aldoso


text: Category:abq:Months

title: Category:abq:Months


text:
pompis

Noun

 * 1)  butt buttocks

title: pompis


text:
pantoprazole

Etymology
Probably from.

Noun

 * 1)  A benzimidazole derivative (trademark Protonix) that inhibits gastric acid secretion and is administered in the form of its sodium salt C16H14F2N3NaO4S to treat erosive esophagitis and disorders (as ) involving gastric acid hypersecretion.

title: pantoprazole


text:
natsilainen

Adjective

 * 1) Nazi

title: natsilainen


text: amilopectine

title: amilopectine


text:
prótesis

Noun

 * 1)  prosthesis
 * 2)  prothesis

title: prótesis


text: Category:ab:Sciences

title: Category:ab:Sciences


text: piegature

title: piegature


text:
napanteri

Etymology
<

Noun

 * 1) A drink dose of strong alcoholic beverage; snifter, sip.

title: napanteri


text: pietraie

title: pietraie


text: pifferai

title: pifferai


text: pigiatrici

title: pigiatrici


text: pignatte

title: pignatte


text: pirofile

title: pirofile


text: superalcolici

title: superalcolici


text: concentratissima

title: concentratissima


text: concentratissimi

title: concentratissimi


text: supersfide

title: supersfide


text: concentratissime

title: concentratissime


text:
moukku

Noun

 * 1)  punch, hit
 * 2)  drink dose of strong alcoholic beverage; snifter, sip
 * 1)  drink dose of strong alcoholic beverage; snifter, sip

Etymology 2
. Cognates include 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) roe pouch
 * 2) air bladder
 * 3) lump, clod
 * 1) air bladder
 * 2) lump, clod
 * 1) lump, clod
 * 1) lump, clod

title: moukku


text: tracciature

title: tracciature


text: sbracata

title: sbracata


text: velisti

title: velisti


text: sbracati

title: sbracati


text: sbracate

title: sbracate


text: veliste

title: veliste


text: pienotta

title: pienotta


text: vitellini

title: vitellini


text: pienotti

title: pienotti


text: pienotte

title: pienotte


text: accudimenti

title: accudimenti


text: pirica

title: pirica


text: bacheliti

title: bacheliti


text: pirici

title: pirici


text: piriche

title: piriche


text: aldoesosi

title: aldoesosi


text: pirofili

title: pirofili


text: aldopentosi

title: aldopentosi


text: semimembranosa

title: semimembranosa


text: aldotriosi

title: aldotriosi


text: semimembranosi

title: semimembranosi


text: semimembranose

title: semimembranose


text: aldotetrosi

title: aldotetrosi


text: sfocata

title: sfocata


text: sfocati

title: sfocati


text: aldosi

title: aldosi


text: sfocate

title: sfocate


text: subsahariana

title: subsahariana


text: subsahariani

title: subsahariani


text: subsahariane

title: subsahariane


text: superalcolica

title: superalcolica


text:
nataliteetti

Etymology
(see 🇨🇬). Contains the suffix.

Noun

 * 1) natality

title: nataliteetti


text: superalcoliche

title: superalcoliche


text: taroccata

title: taroccata


text: taroccati

title: taroccati


text: taroccate

title: taroccate


text: ubiqua

title: ubiqua


text: ubiqui

title: ubiqui


text:
ejidatario

Noun

 * 1) A member of an ejido.

Noun

 * 1) a co-op member
 * 2) a member of one of the communal land ownership schemes known as ejidos

title: ejidatario


text: vitellina

title: vitellina


text: acetalica

title: acetalica


text: acetalici

title: acetalici


text: acetaliche

title: acetaliche


text: aldeidica

title: aldeidica


text: aldeidici

title: aldeidici


text: aldeidiche

title: aldeidiche


text:
pirtti

Etymology
Borrowed from (compare 🇨🇬, but also 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬). Akin to 🇨🇬 and 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) cabin, cottage
 * 2) living room, main room especially in a farmhouse or older house

title: pirtti


text:
raappa

Noun

 * 1) scraper

title: raappa


text:
napataatta

Etymology
🇰🇲

Noun

 * 1) A short person.

title: napataatta


text:
мазахӏван

Noun

 * 1) February

Related terms

 * Previous: . Next:

title: мазахӏван


text: sæst

title: sæst


text:
гӏапынхъамыз

Noun

 * 1) March

Related terms

 * Previous: . Next:

title: гӏапынхъамыз


text:
мартӏ

Noun

 * 1) March

Related terms

 * Previous: . Next:

title: мартӏ


text:
ståltråd

Etymology
Compound of and.

Noun

 * 1) steel wire

Noun

 * 1) steel wire

title: ståltråd


text: ståltråden

title: ståltråden


text: ståltråde

title: ståltråde


text: ståltrådene

title: ståltrådene


text:
пхынхъа

Noun

 * 1) June

Related terms

 * Previous: . Next:

title: пхынхъа


text:
yardaje

Noun

 * 1) yardage

title: yardaje


text:
millaje

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) mileage

title: millaje


text:
kilometraje

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) distance measured in kilometers

title: kilometraje


text:
metraje

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) the duration of a film
 * 2) distance measured in meters

title: metraje


text:
case-by-case

Adjective

 * 1) Separate and distinct from others of the same kind; treated individually.

title: case-by-case


text:
пхынчыльа

Noun

 * 1) July

Related terms

 * Previous: . Next:

title: пхынчыльа


text:
charcha

Etymology
.

Adjective

 * 1)  trashy of very poor quality, worthless

Noun

 * 1)  fat

title: charcha


text: muletas

title: muletas


text:
amilosio

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  amylose

title: amilosio


text:
anomero

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  anomer

title: anomero


text:
anomerico

Adjective

 * 1)  anomeric

title: anomerico


text:
arabinosio

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  arabinose

title: arabinosio


text:
closed-mindedness

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) The state or quality of being closed-minded.
 * We’ve seen faith calcify into self-righteousness, closed-mindedness, and cruelty toward others.

title: closed-mindedness


text:
cellobiosio

Noun

 * 1)  cellobiose

title: cellobiosio


text:
fucosio

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  fucose

title: fucosio


text:
trealosio

Noun

 * 1)  trehalose

title: trealosio


text:
triulosio

Noun

 * 1)  triulose

title: triulosio


text:
triulose

Noun

 * 1)  dihydroxyacetone considered as a ketotriose

Translations

 * Italian: triulosio

title: triulose


text: tråden

title: tråden


text:
tråde

Etymology 1
Derived from the noun.

Verb

 * 1) to thread

Etymology 2
From, , , from. See under.

Verb

 * 1)  to tread

title: tråde


text: trådene

title: trådene


text: tråddet

title: tråddet


text: tråddene

title: tråddene


text:
dalol

Etymology
Probably from or possibly the verbal continuation of an original unattested verbal noun.

Verb

 * 1) to sing

title: dalol


text:
töröl

Verb

 * 1)  to wipe, dust optionally into something like a cloth:
 * 2)  to delete, erase
 * 3)  to annul, cancel
 * 1)  to delete, erase
 * 2)  to annul, cancel
 * 1)  to annul, cancel

title: töröl


text:
biomolecola

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  biomolecule

title: biomolecola


text:
carbonile

Noun

 * 1)  carbonyl

title: carbonile


text:
carbonilico

Adjective

 * 1)  carbonyl

title: carbonilico


text:
chetoso

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  ketose

title: chetoso


text: operák

title: operák


text:
chetotrioso

Etymology
chetoso + trioso

Noun

 * 1)  ketotriose

title: chetotrioso


text:
chetotetroso

Etymology
chetoso + tetroso

Noun

 * 1)  ketotetrose

title: chetotetroso


text:
chetopentoso

Etymology
chetoso + pentoso

Noun

 * 1)  ketopentose

title: chetopentoso


text:
chetoesoso

Etymology
chetoso + esoso

Noun

 * 1)  ketohexose

title: chetoesoso


text:
dalmű

Noun

 * 1)  opera

title: dalmű


text:
dalművek

Etymology
From the dalműv- stem of.

title: dalművek


text:
chetonico

Adjective

 * 1) ketonic

title: chetonico


text:
Appendix:Finnish conjugation

This page is intended to give an overview of the conjugation (verbal inflection) types in Finnish, and to help editors find the right conjugation table template.

The numbering system is based on the Kotus numbering.

Kotus numbering
Kotimaisten kielten tutkimuskeskus (Kotus, officially translated as Research Institute for the Languages of Finland) lists 27 conjugation types for Finnish verbs, as listed below.

Some types are far more common than others, as indicated by the Wiktionary entry counts.

Consonant gradation
The possible asterisk and letter after a number represent a consonant gradation class. See Appendix:Finnish consonant gradation.

NSK to Kotus table
The table below maps NSK (Nykysuomen sanakirja) conjugation types to Kotus conjugation types.

title: Appendix:Finnish conjugation


text:
chitina

Noun

 * 1)  chitin

title: chitina


text: Template:fo-conj-gangast

title: Template:fo-conj-gangast


text:
deossizucchero

Noun

 * 1)  deoxy sugar

title: deossizucchero


text:
desossizucchero

Noun

 * 1)  deoxy sugar

title: desossizucchero


text:
desossiribosio

Noun

 * 1)  deoxyribose

title: desossiribosio


text:
diidrossiacetone

Noun

 * 1)  dihydroxyacetone

title: diidrossiacetone


text:
emiacetalico

Adjective

 * 1)  hemiacetalic

title: emiacetalico


text:
emichetalico

Adjective

 * 1)  hemiketal

title: emichetalico


text:
emichetale

Noun

 * 1)  hemiketal

title: emichetale


text:
emiacetale

Noun

 * 1)  hemiacetal

title: emiacetale


text:
eparina

Noun

 * 1)  heparin

title: eparina


text:
epimero

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  epimer

title: epimero


text:
epimerico

Adjective

 * 1) epimeric

title: epimerico


text:
epimerizzazione

Noun

 * 1)  epimerization

title: epimerizzazione


text: amilosi

title: amilosi


text: anomeri

title: anomeri


text: arabinosi

title: arabinosi


text: cellobiosi

title: cellobiosi


text: fucosi

title: fucosi


text: trealosi

title: trealosi


text: triulosi

title: triulosi


text: anomerica

title: anomerica


text: anomerici

title: anomerici


text: biomolecole

title: biomolecole


text: anomeriche

title: anomeriche


text: carbonili

title: carbonili


text: carbonilica

title: carbonilica


text: carbonilici

title: carbonilici


text: chetosi

title: chetosi


text: carboniliche

title: carboniliche


text: chetotriosi

title: chetotriosi


text: chetonica

title: chetonica


text: chetonici

title: chetonici


text: chetotetrosi

title: chetotetrosi


text: chetoniche

title: chetoniche


text: chetopentosi

title: chetopentosi


text: emiacetalica

title: emiacetalica


text: emiacetalici

title: emiacetalici


text: chetoesosi

title: chetoesosi


text: emiacetaliche

title: emiacetaliche


text: emichetalica

title: emichetalica


text: emichetalici

title: emichetalici


text: emichetaliche

title: emichetaliche


text: deossizuccheri

title: deossizuccheri


text: epimerica

title: epimerica


text: desossizuccheri

title: desossizuccheri


text: epimerici

title: epimerici


text: epimeriche

title: epimeriche


text: desossiribosi

title: desossiribosi


text: diidrossiacetoni

title: diidrossiacetoni


text: emichetali

title: emichetali


text: emiacetali

title: emiacetali


text: eparine

title: eparine


text: epimeri

title: epimeri


text: epimerizzazioni

title: epimerizzazioni


text:
pigtråd

Etymology
Compound of and.

Noun

 * 1) barbed wire

title: pigtråd


text: pigtråden

title: pigtråden


text: pigtråde

title: pigtråde


text: pigtrådene

title: pigtrådene


text:
varianta

Noun

 * 1) variant something that is slightly different from a type or norm

Noun

 * 1) variant; variation

title: varianta


text: dáliák

title: dáliák


text: zjednodušovat

title: zjednodušovat


text:
մատյան

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) journal, register, diary
 * 2) a register in school wherein pupils’ grades and absences are marked
 * 3) roll, list
 * 4) book, manuscript usually medieval

title: մատյան


text: Template:fo-conj-dative

title: Template:fo-conj-dative


text:
գիր

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) letter symbol in an alphabet
 * 2)  script, writing system
 * 3) document
 * 4) tail of a coin
 * 1) document
 * 2) tail of a coin

Etymology
From, from. Cognates include 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬 (German ) and Old English (English ).

Noun

 * 1) letter
 * 2) letter, epistle
 * 3) writing, document, something written
 * 4)  book, volume, manuscript
 * 5)  holy scripture, Bible
 * 1)  book, volume, manuscript
 * 2)  holy scripture, Bible
 * 1)  book, volume, manuscript
 * 2)  holy scripture, Bible
 * 1)  holy scripture, Bible
 * 1)  holy scripture, Bible

title: գիր


text:
tålmod

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) patience

title: tålmod


text: tålmodet

title: tålmodet


text:
գրեմ

Etymology
A denominative from.

Verb

 * 1) to write, to compose
 * 2) to engrave, to carve
 * 3) to paint
 * 4) to esteem, to value
 * 5)  to be inscribed
 * 6)  to be esteemed or valued
 * 1)  to be esteemed or valued

title: գրեմ