text:
Template:blend/documentation

This template shows the etymology of a blend word. For further details on what qualifies as a "blend word", the should be consulted.

Parameters

 * The language code (see Languages) of the language this term appears in.
 * The language code (see Languages) of the language this term appears in.

 * The terms that were used to form the blend. At least two must be provided.
 * The terms that were used to form the blend. At least two must be provided.

 * A script code (see Scripts) to override the default if necessary.
 * A script code (see Scripts) to override the default if necessary.

 * Show the initial text with a lowercase initial letter.
 * Show the initial text with a lowercase initial letter.

 * Omit the initial text altogether. The first thing displayed will be the first term in the blend.
 * Omit the initial text altogether. The first thing displayed will be the first term in the blend.

 * Do not categorize the entry. This should be used when mentioning blends in languages other than the current language.
 * Do not categorize the entry. This should be used when mentioning blends in languages other than the current language.

The following parameters are available for each matching term in the numbered/positional parameters. The  must be replaced by the corresponding term index. For example, for the second part (positional parameter 3), use 2 for. Most of these parameters correspond directly to the equivalent parameters in the standard (and ) template.
 * The alternative display form. Equivalent to the second parameter of.
 * The alternative display form. Equivalent to the second parameter of.

 * A gloss/translation to show after the term. Equivalent to the third parameter of . The parameter  is deprecated for this purpose.
 * A gloss/translation to show after the term. Equivalent to the third parameter of . The parameter  is deprecated for this purpose.

 * The transliteration, as in.
 * The transliteration, as in.

 * The part of speech label to show after the term, as in.
 * The part of speech label to show after the term, as in.

Examples
The entry might have in its etymology

yielding

Template Data
{	"params": { "1": {			"label": "language code", "type": "string", "required": true, "aliases": [ "lang" ],			"description": "the 2- or 3-letter language code for the current section", "example": "en" },		"2": {			"label": "first component", "type": "wiki-page-name", "required": true, "description": "the first component of the word", "example": "man" },		"3": {			"label": "second component", "type": "wiki-page-name", "required": true, "description": "the second component of the blend", "example": "boobs" },		"sc": { "label": "script code", "type": "string" },		"pos1": { "label": "first component part of speech", "type": "string" },		"pos2": { "label": "second component part of speech", "type": "string" },		"alt1": { "label": "first component alternate text", "type": "string", "description": "Text to show instead of the first component for the link to its entry" },		"alt2": { "label": "second component alternate text", "type": "string", "description": "Text to show instead of the second component for the link to its entry" },		"t1": { "label": "first component gloss", "type": "string", "description": "brief gloss of the first component" },		"t2": { "label": "second component gloss", "type": "string", "description": "brief gloss of the second component" },		"tr1": { "label": "first component transliteration", "type": "string", "description": "Transliteration of the first component (for non-Latin scripts)" },		"tr2": { "label": "second component transliteration", "type": "string", "description": "Transliteration of the second component (for non-Latin scripts)" },		"4": {			"label": "third component", "description": "if the blend is of more than two components, params 4, 5, 6, ... may also be provided", "type": "wiki-page-name" },		"5": {			"label": "fourth component", "description": "if the blend is of more than two components, params 4, 5, 6, ... may also be provided", "type": "wiki-page-name" }	},	"format": "inline", "description": "Marks a word as a blend of multiple components" }

title: Template:blend/documentation


text:
Template:back-formation/documentation

Use this template in an etymology section of back-formations.

Parameters

 * 1
 * The language code (see Languages) for the language that the term is in. All Wiktionary language codes are supported, including those for constructed and reconstructed languages.

 * 2
 * The term that this term was back-formed from. The template will automatically remove diacritics and punctuation from the page title, according to the  setting in Module:languages, but will keep them in the displayed text. To link to a reconstructed term, such as Proto-Germanic, add * in front of this parameter.

 * alt or 3
 * Alternate text to display in place of the term specified in 2. The displayed term will still link to the page specified in 2. This can be used, for example, to add parens around a portion of the term. Please do not use this only for adding diacritics or punctuation to the term, as the template can automatically remove these. See above.

 * t or 4
 * A gloss or short translation of the term. The parameter gloss is deprecated for this purpose.

 * sc
 * The script code (see Scripts) for the script that the term is written in. When no code is given, the template will try to detect the script based on the characters in the term and the scripts in the language's data table (see ). In most cases, it will succeed. If it fails, the code  will be used.

 * tr
 * Transliteration for non-Latin-script terms. When no transliteration is given, the template will try to add a default transliteration when possible. For certain languages, automated transliteration will override the value of this parameter. Use  if you don't want a transliteration to be automatically generated (you shouldn't really ever do this in an entry).

 * ts
 * Transcription for non-Latin-script terms whose transliteration is markedly different from the actual pronunciation. Should not be used for IPA pronunciations.

 * pos
 * A part of speech indication for the term.

 * g, g2, g3 and so on
 * Gender and number; see Module:gender and number for details.

 * lit
 * A literal translation for the term.

 * id
 * A sense id for the term, which links to anchors on the page set by the template.

 * accel
 * Provides acceleration tags to be used by the WT:ACCEL gadget, to automatically generate an entry when the link is clicked. See for more information.

 * 1
 * Show the initial text with a lowercase initial letter.

 * 1
 * Omit the initial text altogether. The first thing displayed will be the link to the term from which this term is back-formed.

 * 1
 * Don't add the term to any category. Normally the term will be added to a category of the form, based on the language specified using 1.

Examples
produces

produces

produces

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Template:back-formation/documentation


text:
mancınık

Etymology
From, from.

Noun

 * 1) trebuchet
 * 2) catapult
 * 3) ballista

title: mancınık


text:
többnejű

Etymology
, from, from.

Adjective

 * 1) polygynous practicing polygyny

title: többnejű


text:
Template:b.g.c./documentation

Usage
This template is equivalent to. It's a convenient way to link to Google Book Search results.

title: Template:b.g.c./documentation


text:
Template:audio-list/documentation

Usage
An audio template for circumstances where space is at a premium, will hopefully debut at Index:Hungarian. Conrad.Irwin 00:07, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

 * carefully adv.

title: Template:audio-list/documentation


text:
Template:color panel/documentation

Usage
This template can be used to display one or two color panels in an entry about the name of a color.

Parameters

 * 1 — the name of the color. If the name is not specified, the template defaults to the entry name.
 * 2 (in some cases 1) — mandatory: the hex triplet of the color in the format RRGGBB, with no preceding " ", for example:
 * FF0000 – red
 * FF536B – light red
 * 00FF00 – green
 * 0000FF – blue
 * 3 (in some cases 2) — some terms can refer to more than one colour. This parameter can be used to indicate the hex triplet of a second colour panel.

If the first parameter is not used to specify the name of the color, the template will assume that the first parameter is the hex triplet of the first color, and the second parameter is hex triplet of the second color.

Examples

 * Wikitext:
 * (if used in the entry ); or
 * Result:
 * Result:

 * Wikitext:
 * (if used in the entry ); or
 * Result:
 * Result:

The template should generally be placed directly below a definition, like this:

 * 1) The blood-red colour of raw flesh; crimson.

title: Template:color panel/documentation


text:
ছাত্র

Etymology
, from.

Noun

 * 1) student

title: ছাত্র


text:
chulengo

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) A young guanaco.

title: chulengo


text: Hiroşima

title: Hiroşima


text:
kirjaus

Noun

 * 1)  entry, record
 * 2)  registration

title: kirjaus


text:
parasiticus

Adjective

 * 1) parasitic

title: parasiticus


text:
User:Heyzeuss/fillintheblank

http://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?action=submit&title=User:Heyzeuss/foobar

Verb

 * 1) foobar

title: User:Heyzeuss/fillintheblank


text:
phenylacetic

Adjective

 * 1) Of or pertaining to phenylacetic acid or its derivatives

Translations

 * Czech: fenyloctová
 * Italian: fenilacetico
 * Kazakh: фенилуксусной
 * Macedonian: фенилоцетна
 * Romanian: fenilacetic
 * Uzbek: fenilasetik

title: phenylacetic


text:
phylome

Noun

 * 1)  The complete set of gene phylogenies of an individual or organism

Related terms

 * (or phylogenomics)

title: phylome


text:
Template:confix/documentation

For use in the Etymology sections of words which consist of only a prefix and a suffix, or which were formed by simultaneous application of a prefix and a suffix to another element.

This template essentially combines the functions of and, using the “con-” prefix to show both characteristics are combined. The first element is treated as a prefix, whereas the last element is treated as a suffix; an entry in which this template is transcluded will be added automatically to those affixes’ derivation categories.

Examples
For example, the derivations of and  can be written: Which generates:

Note this is not the same as
 * Which generates:
 * since gen does not have a meaning tied to gene but rather links to generation
 * since gen does not have a meaning tied to gene but rather links to generation

In contrast, adds the entry in which it is used to categories of the form "[Language name] compounds". It is intended for true compounds where neither the first nor the second term are affixes.

Optional arguments

 * t1, t2, t3: Glosses (the 't' stands for "translation")
 * tr1, tr2, tr3: Transliteration of word 1, word 2, word 3 respectively (for non-Latin scripts)
 * sc: Script code. See Scripts.
 * alt1, alt2, alt3: Alternate (display) text.
 * 1
 * Suppresses categorization

Template Data
{	"params": { "1": {			"label": "language code", "type": "string", "required": true, "aliases": [ "lang" ],			"description": "the 2- or 3-letter language code for the current section", "example": "en" },		"2": {			"label": "prefix", "type": "wiki-page-name", "required": true, "description": "the prefix of the word", "example": "neuro" },		"3": {			"label": "suffix", "type": "wiki-page-name", "required": true, "description": "the suffix of the word", "example": "genic" },		"sc": { "label": "script code", "type": "string" },		"pos1": { "label": "prefixal part of speech", "type": "string" },		"pos2": { "label": "suffixal part of speech", "type": "string" },		"alt1": { "label": "prefix alternate text", "type": "string", "description": "Text to show instead of the prefix for the link to its entry" },		"alt2": { "label": "suffix alternate text", "type": "string", "description": "Text to show instead of the suffix for the link to its entry" },		"t1": { "label": "prefix gloss", "type": "string", "description": "brief gloss of the prefix" },		"t2": { "label": "suffix gloss", "type": "string", "description": "brief gloss of the suffix" },		"tr1": { "label": "prefix transliteration", "type": "string", "description": "Transliteration of the prefix (for non-Latin scripts)" },		"tr2": { "label": "suffix transliteration", "type": "string", "description": "Transliteration of the suffix (for non-Latin scripts)" }	},	"format": "inline", "description": "For use in the Etymology sections of words which consist of only a prefix and a suffix, or which were formed by simultaneous application of a prefix and a suffix to some other element(s)." }

ja:テンプレート:confix

title: Template:confix/documentation


text:
phytocentric

Adjective

 * 1)  Describing any system or classification based upon plants

title: phytocentric


text:
Template:comment-link/documentation

Usage

 * →
 * →

Parameters

 * 1) The name of the entry (or other page) to link to.
 * 2) The desired tooltip text.
 * 3) The link text. (Optional; defaults to the name of the entry or other page.)

title: Template:comment-link/documentation


text:
vamzer

Etymology
From the argot.

Noun

 * 1)  rat, snitch (informer)

Declension
or

title: vamzer


text:
Template:enum/documentation

Usage
For a horizontal layout use.

title: Template:enum/documentation


text: polytomies

title: polytomies


text:
Template:eclipsis of/documentation

Examples
E.g. on :
 * 1)  gives

title: Template:eclipsis of/documentation


text: proxygenes

title: proxygenes


text:
proxygene

Noun

 * 1)  A full-length protein that has high local similarity with a specific short length of nucleic acid

title: proxygene


text:
Template:fr-dualh/documentation

Usage

 * This template denotes that the word in question can take either aspirated h or mute h.
 * Use this template in the ===Pronunciation=== section.
 * This template includes the page in Category:French terms taking either aspirated or mute h. If you don't want it to, include a nocat=1 parameter.

title: Template:fr-dualh/documentation


text:
Template:diffurl/documentation

Usage
Used by, but can be used alone, too. Displays the URL for a diff. The first two numbered parameters are the ID numbers of the revisions (in either order). If only the first parameter is given, the diff is to the previous revision. If only the second is given, the diff is to the current revision. Thus: Moreover, there's an optional named Boolean parameter,, or you can use  , which, if nonzero, makes the diff URL have diffonly set.
 * yields
 * yields
 * yields
 * yields
 * yields
 * yields
 * yields
 * yields
 * yields

title: Template:diffurl/documentation


text:
Template:he-defective spelling of/documentation

Usage
This templates generates definition lines for Hebrew defective spellings; that is, spellings that omit yuds and/or vavs that indicate vowel sounds. Defective spellings used to be standard for many words; Biblical and liturgical texts commonly use defective spellings.

Use of the template categorizes an entry in Category:Hebrew defective spellings.

Parameters

 * 1: mandatory: the standard-spelled term
 * wv: optional: the same, with vowels
 * nocap: optional: if non-blank, don't capitalize the first letter

Examples

 * { {he-defective spelling of|קול}} →
 * { {he-defective spelling of|קול|wv=קוֹל}} →
 * { {he-defective spelling of|קול|nocap=1}} →
 * { {he-defective spelling of|קול|wv=קוֹל|nocap=1}} →


text:
psychrotrophic

Adjective

 * 1)  Describing microorganisms that thrive in a cold environment.

Translations

 * Finnish: psykrotrofinen, viileähakuinen
 * Irish: sícreatrófach
 * Italian: psicrotrofico

title: psychrotrophic


text:
Talk:garden path

Shouldn't there be something here on how being led down the garden path means to be misled?

 * Yes - added. SemperBlotto 16:12, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

title: Talk:garden path


text:
saproxanthin

Noun

 * 1)  A rare monocyclic carotenoid.

title: saproxanthin


text:
örs

Etymology
, from, a development of ; related to hörgüç.

Noun

 * 1) anvil
 * 2)  anvil; an incus bone in the inner ear.

title: örs


text: Category:bn:Beverages

title: Category:bn:Beverages


text: Category:bn:Liquids

title: Category:bn:Liquids


text: Category:bn:Chemistry

title: Category:bn:Chemistry


text: Category:bn:Matter

title: Category:bn:Matter


text:
Talk:skinny

naked or nude?
i dont think this works. theres no other context where skinny is used to mean nude. also, skinny can not be switched with any synonym in that context. "nude dipping"? "naked dipping"? skinny-dipping is a colloquialism based on skin-diving. Vinithehat 16:18, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
 * What about used in this context: "she was in her skinnies"? DB 18:10, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

RFV discussion
Rfv-sense: naked, nude. Is this ever used outside of skinny dipping? There's no reason to think the skinny in skinny dipping means 'nude', as it's an idiom. Mglovesfun (talk) 16:23, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I have added a noun sense nakedness, which is mostly found as in the skinny. I have also added quotations for the adjective in question, but only in the construction "[swim] skinny". DCDuring TALK 17:38, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Looks good, although I think "take our clothes oft" is a scanno for "take our clothes off. Mglovesfun (talk) 17:48, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Is this a separate etymology, ? —msh210℠ (talk) 18:12, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't know. If it is, the noun sense skinny: (c. WWII) might be from the same source. It's no semantic stretch, so it could have been lurking for quite some time as a secondary sense. "Resembling skin" was apparently the original sense. In playground team summer sports, teams are often "shirts" and "skins". Skin-diving has the same "zero-clothing" metaphor for "skin". DCDuring TALK 20:07, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

I found one quote. However, it's still ambiguous. Was he "naked" in his underpants, or "thin/slim" in his underpants? In any case, he's not completely naked. Ackatsis 04:53, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
 * 1998 Meanjin, Volume 57, Issues 3-4, University of Melbourne, p571
 * He stood there, skinny in his underpants, while she held the dress against his body. Then he stepped into it, and she buttoned him up at the back.

Here's another one, this time less ambiguous. Ackatsis 04:56, 25 July 2010 (UTC) Passes. Mglovesfun (talk) 07:59, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
 * 1994 Geoffrey Atheling Wagner, A singular passion: a novel, Baskerville Publishers, p200
 * When I went in again, the desirable alien was in bed with eyelids closed [...], obviously sleeping skinny, to employ her own term for it.

 * Striking per Mglovesfun. —Ruakh TALK 16:59, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Etymology
I think it would be good if we had information on this. For example, how 'skinny' relates to nudity is easily understood: people are baring skin, thus projecting a skin-ny attribute. One thing that has confused me is how this term came to mean lean/slender/thin etc. It is people with greater bulk (muscle or fat) who have more skin to cover all that tissue. Slender people tend to have less skin because they have less body mass to cover up. It's almost counter-intuitive. Does anyone have any information on how long people have been using it this way? I'm very interested in tracking down the etymological origins. DB 18:10, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:skinny


text:
splendidus

Adjective

 * 1) splendid, bright, glittering
 * 2) distinguished, noble, illustrious

title: splendidus


text: speech acts

title: speech acts


text:
sulfobenzaldehyde

Noun

 * 1)  Any of three isomeric sulfonic acids derived from benzaldehyde (or formyl derivatives of benzenesulfonic acid)

title: sulfobenzaldehyde


text:
sulfobenzoate

Noun

 * 1)  Any of three isomeric sulfonic acids derived from benzoate (or carboxy derivatives of benzenesulfonic acid); the anion of sulfobenzoic acid

title: sulfobenzoate


text:
trällern

Verb

 * 1) to trill (to sing with a trill)

title: trällern


text:
बोलणे

Etymology
, from, from , from. Compare 🇨🇬 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬 /, 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1) to speak

title: बोलणे


text:
trichothecene

Noun

 * 1) Any of many related mycotoxins produced by pathogenic fungi species of the genus.

title: trichothecene


text:
দুনিয়া

Etymology
, from. Cognate with 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) world

title: দুনিয়া


text:
turbomycin

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) Any of a group of antibiotics, produced by soil microorganisms, that were isolated using metagenomics

title: turbomycin


text: слязъл

title: слязъл


text: слезлият

title: слезлият


text: слезлия

title: слезлия


text: слязла

title: слязла


text: слязлата

title: слязлата


text: слязло

title: слязло


text: слязлото

title: слязлото


text: слезли

title: слезли


text: слезлите

title: слезлите


text: слезел

title: слезел


text: слезела

title: слезела


text: слезело

title: слезело


text: слезели

title: слезели


text: слезеш

title: слезеш


text:
слезе

Verb

 * 1)  to descend, get off

title: слезе


text: слезем

title: слезем


text: слезете

title: слезете


text: слязат

title: слязат


text: слезех

title: слезех


text: слезеше

title: слезеше


text: слезехме

title: слезехме


text: слезехте

title: слезехте


text: слезеха

title: слезеха


text: слязох

title: слязох


text: слязохме

title: слязохме


text: слязохте

title: слязохте


text: слязоха

title: слязоха


text: слез

title: слез


text: слезте

title: слезте


text:
virens

Etymology
Present active participle of.

Participle

 * 1)  green
 * 2) flourishing; vigorous

title: virens


text: смазал

title: смазал


text: смазалият

title: смазалият


text: смазалия

title: смазалия


text: смазала

title: смазала


text: смазалата

title: смазалата


text: смазало

title: смазало


text: смазалото

title: смазалото


text: смазали

title: смазали


text: смазалите

title: смазалите


text: acuinter

title: acuinter


text: смажел

title: смажел


text: смажела

title: смажела


text:
উর্দু

Etymology
, ultimately from.

Proper noun

 * 1) Urdu language
 * 2) soldier
 * 3) army camp, cantonment
 * 1) army camp, cantonment

title: উর্দু


text: смажело

title: смажело


text: смажели

title: смажели


text: смазан

title: смазан


text: смазаният

title: смазаният


text: смазания

title: смазания


text: смазани

title: смазани


text: смазаните

title: смазаните


text: смазана

title: смазана


text: смазаната

title: смазаната


text: смазано

title: смазано


text: смазаното

title: смазаното


text: смажеш

title: смажеш


text:
xylosyl

Noun

 * 1)  A univalent radical derived from xylose.

title: xylosyl


text: смаже

title: смаже


text: смажем

title: смажем


text:
смажете

Pronunciation

title: смажете


text: смажат

title: смажат


text: смажех

title: смажех


text: смажеше

title: смажеше


text:
Talk:גוץ

Oh, and one other thing, if I may ask. It was quite hard for me to find the right translation for גוץ. In Modern Hebrew it is an adjective that describes either an chubby short-height person or, less frequently, a person of short height but massive built (not muscular, but definitely not slim). Since this is basically an English dictionary, I tried to find an English equivalent rather than explain the term in English, but I'm not completely sure of the result. Thanks. Drork 09:47, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Stocky? —msh210℠ 15:04, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Does "stocky" also entails "of short height"? Drork 15:24, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Hm, I suppose not. Our entry says (among other things) "compact", which implies short height relative to weight, though not necessarily short inherently. I don't know of a better word. Perhaps define it as "short and stocky" or something? Or maybe someone else can think of a single word (or even a better turn of phrase) for it: [[WT:TR]] is a good place to ask. Ruakh is our major Hebrew editor (especially modern Hebrew; I do more Biblical Hebrew), and may be able to help you with this word. Sorry I couldn't help you with it more; if I do think of a word for it, I'll let you know. Feel free to ask me anything further here. —msh210℠ 15:29, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

title: Talk:גוץ


text: смажехме

title: смажехме


text: смажехте

title: смажехте


text: смажеха

title: смажеха


text: смазах

title: смазах


text: смаза

title: смаза


text: смазахме

title: смазахме


text: смазахте

title: смазахте


text: смазаха

title: смазаха


text: смажи

title: смажи


text: смазващ

title: смазващ


text: смазващият

title: смазващият


text: смазващия

title: смазващия


text: смазваща

title: смазваща


text: смазващата

title: смазващата


text: смазващо

title: смазващо


text: смазващото

title: смазващото


text: смазващи

title: смазващи


text: смазващите

title: смазващите


text: смазване

title: смазване


text:
custume

Etymology
From, from or , from , accusative singular of , from , from  +. First element derives from, from , from , from. Second element is from, from  + ; related to 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * , nowadays an eye dialect or a misspelling

title: custume


text: смазването

title: смазването


text: смазвания

title: смазвания


text: смазванета

title: смазванета


text: смазванията

title: смазванията


text: смазванетата

title: смазванетата


text: смазвайки

title: смазвайки


text: смазвал

title: смазвал


text:
gone north about

Verb

 * 1)  Dead, of sailor or seaman whose cause of death was anything except by drowning.
 * 2)  Dead.
 * 1)  Dead.

title: gone north about


text: смазвалият

title: смазвалият


text: смазвалия

title: смазвалия


text:
User talk:DanielWaterworth

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, welcome to Wiktionary, and thank you for your contribution so far. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

 * How to edit a page is a concise list of technical guidelines to the wiki format we use here: how to, for example, make text boldfaced or create hyperlinks. Feel free to practice in the sandbox. If you would like a slower introduction we have a short tutorial.
 * Entry layout explained (ELE) is a detailed policy documenting how Wiktionary pages should be formatted. All entries should conform to this standard, the easiest way to do this is to copy exactly an existing page for a similar word.
 * Our Criteria for inclusion (CFI) define exactly which words Wiktionary is interested in including. There is also a list of things that Wiktionary is not for a higher level overview.
 * The FAQ aims to answer most of your remaining questions, and there are several help pages that you can browse for more information.
 * We have discussion rooms in which you can ask any question about Wiktionary or its entries, a glossary of our technical jargon, and some hints for dealing with the more common communication issues.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wiktionarian! If you have any questions, bring them to the Information desk, or ask me on my talk page. If you do so, please sign your posts with four tildes: ~ which automatically produces your username and the current date and time.

Again, welcome! Mglovesfun (talk) 16:59, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

title: User talk:DanielWaterworth


text: смазвала

title: смазвала


text: смазвалата

title: смазвалата


text: смазвало

title: смазвало


text: смазвалото

title: смазвалото


text: смазвали

title: смазвали


text: смазвалите

title: смазвалите


text:
User talk:Msh210/Archive/Razorflame

 * Adding this link for the sake of whatlinkshere.

Razorflame
Can you explain why exactly did you indefblock him? --Ivan Štambuk 07:04, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
 * See his block summaries. —msh210℠ (talk) 07:07, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, did he edit in languages other than those 5? --Ivan Štambuk 07:11, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes. —msh210℠ (talk) 07:12, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
 * So you blocked him indefinitely because he added a Persian transliteration in a translation table that already existed on هوش ? --Ivan Štambuk 07:15, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I blocked him indefinitely because of his numerous bad edits. I thought I could get away with no one's complaining about the block because of . —msh210℠ (talk) 07:19, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

 * AFAICS, he made some ~2500 edits since June 17th when he made a promise not to edit other languages, all of which where OK except that one. Apparently he was adding Esperanto and Ido translation at intelligence, saw Persian هوش without a transliteration, clicked it, saw it provided at [[هوش]], and then propagated it back. The original entry was created by a knowledgeable Persian editor, so there is no reason to assume that Razorflame willfully spread potentially wrong material researched on his own. I wish he hadn't done it but...wouldn't you agree that indefblock is bit too excessive? He didn't do anything wrong after all. Would you agree in lifting the block if Razorflame specifically promised not to edit translation tables in languags other than those 5? --Ivan Štambuk 07:32, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I think that any reasonable reading of what he wrote includes translation tables. Anything else ignores the reason for his promise, which is that people found that they could not trust his edits in other languages: where those edits are made (definition lines, translation tables, Descendants sections) doesn't really matter. That this particular edit can be trusted because it's a copy of an edit by Kaixinguo is false (because Kaixinguo may have made a typo, and Razorflame does not know otherwise, or, at least, cannot be trusted to know otherwise) and irrelevant (because the block is not just for this one edit: it's for many). —msh210℠ (talk) 07:39, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I didn't answer your question. No, I wouldn't. —msh210℠ (talk) 07:40, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

 * I agree with msh210. We've been through this so many times, and I'm tired of it.  Razorflame has been caught making bad edits more times than I can count (and has probably make a whole lot more, which haven't been caught), and always promises to change his behaviour, but never does.  -Atelaes λάλει ἐμοί 12:53, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

 * Agree with msh210 and Atelaes. Mglovesfun (talk) 12:56, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

 * Me, too. (BTW, Ivan says every edit was O.K. except that one, but I've not seen any evidence to support that claim. If he's made 2500 edits in the past two weeks, it's unlikely that each one has been fully scoured by knowledgeable editors.) —Ruakh TALK 13:30, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Incidentally, I just blocked him twice, the second time to add a comment to the block log. I noticed afterwards that the first block had a timespan of "infinite" set and the second "indefinite". This should not be taken to mean that I intended to change from an infinite block to a merely indefinite (but eventually to be removed) one. I did not so intend. The wording change was unintentional, and I intended the block to be permanent. (Obviously, if there is community consensus in disagreement with blocking him permanently, I will abide by it. I'm talking about the more likely scenario that there is no such consensus, and, in any event, about the current situation that such consensus has not been shown to exist.) —msh210℠ (talk) 13:37, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I disagree with this block. Adding a transliteration to a trans table from elsewhere on Wiktionary does not seem like a violation of his promise, and I doubt that he though so either when adding it. He specifically asked for a final chance, and to be permanently blocked if he doesn't keep it, and I'm inclined to believe him. --Yair rand (talk) 18:17, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Believe him about what? I believe him when he said "If I stray at any point, you may block me indefinitely. This will be the final chance". Not penultimate. What are you believing him about? —msh210℠ 18:22, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
 * "This is the first and only time that I am serious about this. I will seriously only edit those five langauges." I have no reason to think that he was lying. --Yair rand (talk) 18:31, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
 * At the time, you mean, I assume, because in retrospect he clearly was. Maybe at the time he thought he was telling the truth, I don't know. What's the difference? —msh210℠ 18:47, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Razorflame has now e-mailed me, asking for an unblock or a revision of the block to be short-term (he suggests a fortnight or so), saying he learns from his mistakes, that he knows he messed up, and he wants "one final chance". I think my comments in the block summaries and above are reply enough to all that, but I have a question for all interested parties who may be watching this page. It seems to be that he really might learn, or mature, or whatever — though not likely in a fortnight. Perhaps the block should only be a year long, so as to give him another chance (yes, yet another chance, but this time a year later)? What think you all? —msh210℠ 19:49, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The particular nature of the mistake doesn't seem very bad. It is only the continuing saga of broken promises and interpersonal conflict that seem to waste time and cause public drama. That those with regular contact with RFlame seem to not value his contributions very much is troublesome. I had encouraged him to make contributions in English, but he did not seem very interested. He seems to be seeking to learn by making mistakes, which approach may be good for him, but is a drain on the patience of those who correct them. This seems like an area where the bulk of editors should defer to those in the best position to assess the contributions since the previous drama. There doesn't seem to be any matter of principle that is not being honored in the process as it is now being carried out here. DCDuring TALK 20:55, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

 * A year seems quite reasonable to me. He certainly has enthusiasm, which is a very useful trait here.  A year-long break would certainly give him impetus to rethink his modus operandi, lest he suffer another one.  -Atelaes λάλει ἐμοί 04:58, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * (In reply to DCDuring.) I suppose people who know Ido, and Esperanto, and Italian, and whatever, can go back and look at all his edits. They shouldn't have to, is sorta the point. If an editor, after so many edits, still is so untrustworthy, he should not be editing. —msh210℠ 18:12, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

I think you guys should cut him some slack. It's a really harsh interpretation to say that he broke his promise by making a contribution in the translation tables. The kid is willing to learn. A block of one year is ridiculous, by the way. --Dijan 05:50, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

 * Before you can block a well-intended editor indefinitely (or for a long time), you have to specify the reasons. "Numerous bad edits" is nebulous and unacceptable. You have to give diffs to the specific edits that you are blocking him for. So far, the only thing that I can make out from this undocumented accusation is that he copied a Persian transliteration from one page and added it to another page. I don’t know which Persian word was involved, so I can’t judge the value of his edit. Razorflame may be a thorn in some of our sides, due to his young age and immaturity and lack of experience, but he tries hard to improve and has his heart in the right place. Like any other editor, he deserves due process, and this block denied due process. If he is to be blocked, it has to be done correctly and fairly. —Stephen 09:48, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * See numerous discussions about his bad edits on his talkpage and its archives. Some of those link to diffs, most do not, but it is clear that all parties to the conversations — Razorflame included — knew what edits they were talking about. —msh210℠ 18:12, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Re due process and fairness: Blocks generally are done by one admin on his own say-so. There is no other process, except that sometimes people contest the block on the blocking admin's talkpage or by e-mailing him. Anyone who wants to do so in this case may do so (and Ivan and you did here, and Razorflame did by e-mail), but as you can see the general opinion — as expressed on this page, anyway — is that a block is in order, forever or at least for a good long time. So I think that the process we usually follow has been followed, and that the general opinion is that the block was fair. —msh210℠ 18:21, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

 * As requested by Razorflame in an email, I will give my opinion here: While Razorflame has done a lot of good here, he has also done a lot which is not really acceptable - while he goes through phases of apologising profusely (to anyone and everyone) he forgets, very very quickly, any of what he has been told and returns to making mistakes. If it could have been shown that he learns from his mistakes, sure, we can unblock him as another "lesson learned". The sad fact is that he doesn't (and there is a very long history to show this), so unblocking him will lead to another fortnight of editing, and then another indefinite block. There is simply no point in going through this any more times, so, let the block stand. Conrad.Irwin 15:48, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

 * It needn't be indefinite, but I agree there should be a block of significant length. Equinox ◑ 15:50, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

 * Razorflame emailed me to give an opinion too. The languages we work on don't overlap, but from the related conversations it seems to me that if you lift the block now you'll have the same discussion pretty soon again. In my life I've seen "second last chances" work, but "third last chances" only lead to more - if there wasn't a temporary ban of some sort, it always ultimately came to a permanent one. That said, I don't know whether Razorflame isn't of the age in which "one year" still almost rhymes with "eternity". --Thrissel 17:57, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

 * RF emailed me too. I think year-long ban is appropriate. I think Mushy did the appropriate thing here, even though he is... *cough*... you know. @Stephen: RF perpetuated wrongly transliterated Persian into the translation table as hush, even though it should have been huš. --Vahagn Petrosyan 22:13, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

 * RF emailed me too. I don't see any problem with that edit, I don't think we can't add transliterations to languages we don't know if its source is well, Wiktionary itself. If the block was based on that edit alone, the block was wrong. Were there any other bad edits after his last unblock? --Anatoli 22:27, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * To answer your last question first, I don't believe anyone's gone through them. I do not feel comfortable answering in the negative (or, to be fair, in the affirmative) without that. To answer you main point ("...add transliterations... if the source..."), Tbot does something similar: it adds translations that it doesn't know are correct, based on others' adding them in other places. But it does so with a big warning that the entry might be wrong, so that no one is fooled. —msh210℠ 23:07, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

 * Razorflame also asked me to give my opinion. I think that what he did didn't deserve a block because (I hope) he just copied the transliteration from هوش even though that doesn't explain why the transliteration was spelled wrong... I don't think he wittingly broke the promise, because he wouldn't have done something that simple knowing that he would be blocked indefinitely. Ultimateria 22:38, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

I thank you all for your comments. I shall revise the block to a length of one year. I doubt whether there's anything more to be said, but if someone has something to say that is novel then by all means go ahead. —msh210℠ 23:15, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Razorflame has e-mailed me four times total, mostly repeating himself. (I've responded here.) I think I am justified in blocking his use of the emailuser tool if he e-mails me another four or five times. If anyone objects to that, please say so. His last message was a note that six admins oppose a long-term block, and that therefore it should be lifted, and my response follows. While six admins do oppose it (including the bureaucrat SGB) (I'm including Ivan, since the condition he specified above has been agreed to by Razorflame in an e-mail message to me), there are six who support it (plus Thrissel), and since generally we rely on the blocking admin's discretion to block in absence of consensus to the contrary, it will stay in place. —msh210℠ 23:30, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

After RF says that he's very serious about not editing any languages besides his "five", and he probably knows that I, if not both Vahag and I, edit Persian and could've asked one of us about the transliteration... the xlit for هوش should be huš, as wikt standards would use sh for سح or سهـ... Regardless of how minor that mistake would be and how inconsistent we currently are in our Persian transliterations, he's made enough mistakes in other minor places that I don't see a problem in permanently banning him for the most minor offenses after he's been warned so many times for doing the same thing over...and over... and over... and over... and over... for more than a year. He explicitly promised not to edit in languages outside of those 5, and even a transliteration is breaking that promise. Isn't 123abc banned permanently for making bad edits even in a language that he seemed to have a pretty good knowledge of? — [ R·I·C ] opiaterein — 00:10, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Judging from the discussion so far, I am keen on joining the six opposing admins, especially Dijan and SGB, for the following reasons:
 * The Persian entry, at the time RF copied the transliteration, contained hush, so his transliteration was consistent therewith. It has been added by Kaixinguo, who is a reliable Persian contributor. Whilst I agree that it should have been huš, I doubt that back in April 2007 (date of creation of the entry) the conversion from sh to š had been indorsed. Therefore, it is Kaixinguo’s responsibility to change it to huš. The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 08:00, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The diff with the added transliteration does not contain anything wrong.
 * I would support a long-term block for RF, if a diff proving his error were provided, which is not the case here. Whilst I agree with Opiaterein’s concern about sh standing for سح, it is true that many Persian entries still use sh for ش. In the past, when blocking RF, Opiaterein was able to refute his edits (chiefly by diffs) and only then resort to blocks (which were subsequently light-heartedly revoked). This is not the case here, so the block is unjustified.
 * If RF managed to not swerve from the 5 languages for a duration of 2 weeks, this may be considered a palpable improvement for an editor such as RF. Therefore I disapprove of sending him a wrong message by blocking him in lieu of encouraging this trend of his. The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 08:00, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
 * PS: Even the article about the Persian letter itself contained sh until I fixed it today. The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 08:03, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Though he could have theoretically checked Persian transliteration beforehand. But still, I don't really think this is a strong enough reason to indef block him. -- Prince Kassad 09:39, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

 * 2 weeks is not that impressive to me... earlier Ivan mentioned that he'd done about 2500 edits without veering into 'forbidden languages', but when you look... a lot of that is just verb forms - which in the case of Ido is 100% copy-paste. Literally, every entry is the same. Further, while copying a transliteration - correct or not - is ok, am I the only one who thinks that he'll just try to make other seemingly insignificant edits in a similar way? Would it have been ok for him to copy هوش to a translation table where it was lacking? It still astounds me that anyone can trust him, given his year-long history of being told not to do something and then going and doing it somewhere else. — [ R·I·C ] opiaterein — 12:32, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

 * I think everyone is looking at this all wrong. msh210 is not handing out a year-long block for a single transliteration error.  That would be absurd.  msh210 is handing out a year-long block for a year consistent pattern of edits, of which this transliteration error is one example.  Razorflame has been asked over and over to stop making edits in languages he does not know, because he makes lots and lots of seemingly innocuous errors.  However, those errors add up over time.  And the important point here is that he's been asked specifically not to do this, because he doesn't take the time to properly research what he enters.  Saying that Kaixinguo is responsible for the error is absurd.  The transliteration was probably valid back when it was entered.  Has anyone here gone over every single edit they've ever made and made sure that they conform to all current standards?  I sure as hell haven't.  It's utterly unreasonable to expect anyone to do so.  However, it is reasonable to expect editors to conform to current standards at the time of their edit.  Razorflame did not take the time to learn the standards, as he so often doesn't.  He's been asked to do so repeatedly, and has promised to do so repeatedly, but ultimately does not.  He is being blocked for consistently refusing to edit in a responsible manner, not for a transliteration error.  -Atelaes λάλει ἐμοί 13:06, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I have never claimed that Kaixinguo is responsible for the error. At the time he created the entry this was the current transliteration, so he duly adhæred thereto. I meant to say that ascertaining the correctness or rectifying errors is expected to be done by him, but not by users with no knowledge in Persian (I am reluctant to quote myself, but I feel compelled: it is Kaixinguo’s responsibility to change it - this has nothing to do with K. is responsible for the error ). Had RF changed the transliteration in the Persian entry, he would have caused far fiercer indignation than by copying a transliteration. The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 15:20, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I think the question is whether RF's behavior over the period since the last block constitutes close to blameless (not absolutely blameless) behavior. If so, that constitutes enormous improvement and may mean that we are finally seeing benefit from having gone through the tedious rounds of broken promises. If we now view RF as likely to go into another round of bad behavior at any moment, what in his most recent behavior that makes that seem more likely? Or do we now think that his last block should have been for much longer and now wish to correct the error? DCDuring TALK 14:25, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
 * RF e-mailed me yet again, this time asking me to reply to DCDuring. I think that his editing Persian, which he does not claim to know, shows retroactively that his May 13, 2010, unblock, in the hope that he would finally edit correctly, was in fact baseless. He might not "go into another round of bad behavior at any moment", but (a) he almost certainly will at some point and (b) the rest of us should not have to constantly look over his shoulder to block him when that occurs. —msh210℠ 19:35, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 * RF has emailed me as well (at 20:52) asking me to comment here. I've not had much interaction with him and so I have very little knowledge of his past indiscretions, and I am reluctant to get involved now but I have read all of the above discussion. There is not universal agreement that the single edit in question (copying the transliteration) broke the spirit of his voluntary agreement, so an indefinite block just for this is not imho appropriate and were it to be taken in isolation then it would be unjustifiable. However, there seems to be a lot of history leading up to it, and so the key question is - can we be certain that unblocking him now will benefit Wiktionary? I don't feel qualified to answer that question either way. The next question is, if he is not unblocked now, is there a chance that in the future he may become a valuable contributor? Given that it appears RF is young, I think the answer is yes, assuming he restricts himself to editing the five languages until such time as those interacting with him agree to lift this restriction.
 * Were this Wikipedia, then the arbitration committee might issue a resolution something like the following, which I think is the best way forward:
 * Razorflame should be blocked for 1 year for any edit that consensus agrees is a breach of his voluntary restriction to edit only in the 5 languages. I personally have no opinion whether the edit in question constitutes such a breach or not.
 * If Razorflame returns at any point after the block expires, he must not make any edits in any languages other than the five listed in his voluntary agreement (including transliterations and translation table entries). The first breach of this will result in an infinite ban.
 * Additional languages may be added to the list only with the agreement of active editors of that language (e.g. adding Haitian Creole to the list requires the agreement of those editors who actively edit Haitian Creole entries on the English Wiktionary) and should be prominently noted on RF's user or user talk page. Thryduulf (talk) 22:02, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

title: User talk:Msh210/Archive/Razorflame


text: смазван

title: смазван


text: смазваният

title: смазваният


text: смазвани

title: смазвани


text: смазваните

title: смазваните


text: смазвана

title: смазвана


text: смазваната

title: смазваната


text: смазвано

title: смазвано


text: смазваното

title: смазваното


text: смазваш

title: смазваш


text: смазва

title: смазва


text: смазваме

title: смазваме


text: смазвате

title: смазвате


text: смазват

title: смазват


text: смазвах

title: смазвах


text: смазваше

title: смазваше


text: смазвахме

title: смазвахме


text: смазвахте

title: смазвахте


text: смазваха

title: смазваха


text: смазвай

title: смазвай


text: смазвайте

title: смазвайте


text: снасящ

title: снасящ


text: снасящият

title: снасящият


text: снасящия

title: снасящия


text: снасяща

title: снасяща


text: снасящата

title: снасящата


text: снасящо

title: снасящо


text: снасящото

title: снасящото


text: снасящи

title: снасящи


text: снасящите

title: снасящите


text: снасяне

title: снасяне


text: снасянето

title: снасянето


text: снасяния

title: снасяния


text: снасянета

title: снасянета


text: снасянията

title: снасянията


text: снасянетата

title: снасянетата


text: снасяйки

title: снасяйки


text: снасял

title: снасял


text: снасялият

title: снасялият


text:
User talk:Bogorm

Antecedent confabulations
Auguﬅ-November 2008 December 2008-February 2009 March-May 2009 June-December 2009 January-July 2010

Template:term usage
Hi, Bogorm.

I stumbled across this edit, where you used to indicate a translation. FYI, the tr parameter is for transliteration, typically used with terms whose script is not Latin/Roman. To specify a translation/gloss, use foo:, which produces foo:. Otherwise, carry on. —Rod (A. Smith) 16:34, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
 * That was back in 2008. Bogorm can now give master classes on 's usage :) --Vahag 19:21, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

грах
Hi. Can you make sure to have separate <references/> tags for each language entry? Thanks. --Bequw → τ
 * By duplicating the reference you added 650 bytes to the entry (because of the long URL of the source) which accounts for ca. 30% of its entire content. Therefore I supposed that one reference section would be a more concise solution. However, if you disrelish this approach, I can proceed in the thriftless way. The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 06:52, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keeping the language sections independent is important. Thrift is good though, so . This can sometimes be done with searches from other sites. Or for frequently used URLs, make an R:* template. --Bequw → τ 00:12, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Slovak formatting
I have standardized the formatting a bit in dážď. The format that you have entered to "dážď" can be seen in some early Slovak entries, but is obviously non-standard for non-English entries in Wiktionary. The same for pľúca.

I have left the stem on the inflection line, although it is unusual to have stems stated anyway. In any case, the inflection-line template is not indented in Wiktionary. --Dan Polansky 12:12, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I took your standardisation into account and intend to apply it henceforth, when providing information about the declension. Doubtless it looks more satisfactory in comparison with the format applied by, our main, and unfortunately, retired Slovak contributor. The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 17:12, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

пиво/бира
пиво is listed as a translation in Bulgarian for beer, but the wikipedia entry for бира doesn't seem to mention it as a synonym. Could you check the Bulgarian section I've added at пиво? — [ R·I·C ] opiaterein — 16:51, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
 * It is indeed a synonym, though less widespread in comparison with бира. This applies especially to the plural: the application of пива is virtually non-existent or at least I have never heard of it. In this context, only бири is sensible to use. пиво rarely applies to a certain and definite amount of beer - it is more likely to refer to the beverage in general, whereas бира can designate both (though I am not certain with regard to that last generalisation). Пиво exists as a redirection. The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 20:26, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

 * For now then, I'll just add little notes under the synonyms sections of and . Thanks :) — [ R·I·C ] opiaterein — 20:41, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Actually, the plural of бира is more common. Using пиво carries a certain flavour, although I would not call it formal or literary. In this particular case, notes are dispensable. The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 20:54, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

 * I tried to only make a note of the singulars under the =synonyms= headers - I didn't want to get too detailed or technical :D — [ R·I·C ] opiaterein — 00:09, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Re: Matres lectionis in Aramaic
Hi Bogorm,

Apologies for my very, very late reply (nearly two years!). Anyway, if your question hasn't already been answered by someone else, the sign above ܐ in ܐܵ is not a mater lectionis in the strictest sense. Matres lectionis are letters that are used as both consonants and vowels (non-simultaneously) in non-dotted/non-vowelled text (namely, the letters ܝ and ܘ, and maybe ܐ and ܗ depending on how you look at it). The mark with two dots in ܐܵ is always a vowel, therefore it is not a mater lectionis.

I think the article ܐܒ, but not ܐܵܒ, should be created separate from ܐܒܐ and not a redirect. The reason for not creating the article ܐܵܒ is because the vowel system in that is only used in Eastern Syriac. Western Syriac would be ܐܳܒ, which is a completely separate form from ܐܵܒ when you search for it in a wiki. The vowel system developed separately between East and West centuries after the main consonants had been developed. The alphabet existed before the East/West split, hence why they both share the basic consonantal alphabet but differ in their vowel systems. Cheers! --334a 15:36, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

 * As far as I know, there's only one way to pronounce ܢܗܪܐ. Also, ܫܡܥ is correct. --334a 14:11, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

*h₂yuh₁ení-
Hi. Thanks for your advice so far and about that thing with Serbo-Croatian. I will keep that in mind for the future :) . But now I'm realy confused. I am about to make an appendix for the Proto-Indo-European word "young" but I don't know which form should be taken here (I've stumbled about *h₂yuh₁ení- ; *juwn̥kós and etc in this wiki). Do you have any guess which form fits here best and is most appropriate? Nero86 18:24, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
 * One of our most knowledgeable editors in this field is Ivan Štambuk. I shall notify him of your hesitation. The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 18:33, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks. That would be nice. I have only a little time these days and maybe he has a good idea or solution for this. Or would it be better if I ask him on my own? Nero86 18:46, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Of course you may, although I already asked him. Besides, enables you to show which languages you speak. The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 18:57, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

 * The original base (root) for this adjective was *h₂yew-. In case of Germanic it reflects the extension in -h₁n̥ḱos with zero-grade of the root, for Slavic it's an e-grade in -Hnos, Latin is from a zero-grade derivative in *-h₁en-, while Sanskrit  and other Indo-Iranian cognates reflect a zero-grade but with extension -h₁on-/-h₁n̥-. Various suffixes, grades, some consonant stems and some vocalic stems, all in all not a single reconstruction can be postulated. If you want to build a master page for listing all descendants, let it be *h₂yew-. --Ivan Štambuk 18:08, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

slikari
Haven't I wrote this entry in the language that I speak? Is this language acceptable on en.wikt? Thanks for replying here on your talk page. -- Bugoslav 08:41, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

 * I don't know which language you think to be speaking, but what you added was Serbo-Croatian. Ethnic names for Serbo-Croatian as fabricated by the respective nationalist governments should be avoided. --Ivan Štambuk 14:14, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi there, Ivan. I am glad that you are back. Could you please have a say in the previous section, where one user asked about a PIE reconstruction? The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 18:30, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Akkadian 'annaku'
Hi. I've noticed you've been adding cuneiform entries. Can you convert this Akkadian word into Unicode and put it in ? --Vahag 21:07, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
 * С Новым годом, Вааг! Yes, I managed to render the word in Cuneiform characters and I also found the uploaded images of the two signs in Commons and added them for those who cannot discern the Unicode characters. Could you please disable the italics for AN.NA, as this represents the names of the Cuneiform characters and names are never written in italics (unlike the values). Astonishingly enough, I was able to disable them for the Sumerian word, but not for the Akkadian one. If you have suggestions regarding the location of the Cuneiform images, they will be welcome, because I am not sure whether the place immediately before or after the transcription befits them better. The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 08:45, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
 * P. S. The entry which you encountered as well as the images use the Neo-Assyrian standard for Cuneiform signs (widespread in the first half of the 1st millennium BC). Here you can descry the same word in the beautiful Old Babylonian form, which was current in the 2nd millennium BC. The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 08:45, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Сбасибо, Богорм. И тебя тоже с Новым годом. I moved images and some other stuff to 𒀭𒈾; this way we don't have to worry about italics. --Vahag 14:14, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Are you sure that anaku (one n) is attested? I cannot find it in dictionaries. The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 07:37, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I took it from here, pages 598-599. --Vahag 12:52, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Akkadian fonts
May I ask how I can see Akkadian script? Now I am seeing small boxes filled with 6 tiny numerals. Thank you, 71.66.97.228 07:48, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 * This is the font that works for me. --Vahag 12:56, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Poll on formatting of etymologies
I would like to know your preference as regards the use of "<" vs "from" in the formatting of etymologies in Wiktionary, whatever that preference is. Even explicit statement of indifference would be nice. You can state your preference in the currently running poll: WT:BP. I am sending you this notification, as you took part on some of the recent votes, so chances are you could be interested in the poll. The poll benefits from having as many participants as possible, to be as representative as possible. Feel free to ignore this notification. --Dan Polansky 10:47, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Another citation for infeft
Monro, Robert (d.1633) (DNB00) as I believe you have an expertise in adding citations Billinghurst 11:23, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for pointing out that occurrence. It has been added. The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 13:14, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Etymology
Hello, you might have precious knowledge for my question on soin Etymology scriptorium linking Germanic, Slavic (here Czech) and latin roots. --Diligent 04:33, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

schrecklichkeit
Hello.

There was a disagreement here: http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Talk:schrecklichkeit

As to whether schrecklichkeit is a word used in German or not. You said you would approach the German Wikipedia editors,

There's a possibility that the only source for it comes from WWI anti-german propaganda, or it might be a real word. What did the German editors say?

Thanks. I have less than a rudimentary knowledge of German, and no real understanding of grammar. I can slowly translate from German to English based on the very little German that I know, and have done this exactly one time:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/O_du_fr%C3%B6hliche

I'm curious about the nature of the word and its history. I would appreciate any information you have as a far more advanced German speaker.

Thanks. OllieGarkey 02:17, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
 * It turned out that there is no single place for general discussion on German wikipedia similar to BP here. Therefore I have not posed that question yet. The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 12:11, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Regarding nebenstehend
Sorry I mean to remove to the comparative and superlative mumbo jumbo as I do not know the markup language for wiki sites and am too lazy to search thru the docs.

Zufuhr
The plural was found because I encountered the word in the wild.

Though the plural is also defined in my physical pocket dictionary from Collins. As well as at Dict.cc. Also you can also find it at the (Collins backended) dictionary online at Reverso.net I did an extra search just right now and Wordreference list it as well. --76.118.229.28 09:42, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Nouns and proper nouns
Hey, I've started a discussion in the Beer Parlor. I'd really like to know the community views on this. Any additional input would be great. Thanks. – Krun 14:10, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

кяр
There are more. I put them in. --Vahag (talk) 17:32, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Great. The Bulgarian Etymological Dictionaty mentions Romanian chiar as well, but I could not find this particular sense. The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 17:55, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Български
Здрасти Bogorm! How are these forms of Bulgarian nouns in the template called in Bulgarian language? I guess count form is бройна форма and vocative form is звателна форма, but I'm not sure about the other three. Sinek (talk) 15:27, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Здравей, Sinek! Literally definite (object form) and definite (subject form) mean определителна [форма] (форма на прякото допълнение) and определителна [форма] (форма на подлога), respectively. However, much more common are expressions like членувана форма (с непълен определителен член) and членувана форма (с пълен определителен член), respectively. Indefinite is to be rendered into Bulgarian as нечленувана форма (literally определителна [форма]). The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 17:45, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Blagodarya mnogo! Sinek (talk) 22:24, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Forgot to add one thing, which declension template would цигара use? The one with the -o vocative, or -e vocative ending? Sinek (talk) 22:48, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The one with -о. The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 05:34, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

-self - long and short forms
Привет,

Как работают болгарское местоимение "себя си"? Для меня форма "себя си" звучит необычно, как например в предложении "тя вижда себе си в огледалото". По-русски - "она видит себя в зеркале".

Как ведёт себя частица "". Её можно ставить и впереди и сзади? Например, при спряжении глагола "смея се". "I laugh/I'm laughing" - "аз се смея". Можно ли сказать "аз смея се"? --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 00:01, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Привет!
 * По первому вопросу: себе си соответствует в большинстве случаев русскому себя. *Себе без последующего си никогда не употребляется.
 * По второму вопросу: Есть такое правило, согласно которому се не может стоять в начале предложения. Поэтому Смея се вместо *Се смея. В остальных случаях се предшествует глаголу. В вопросительных предложениях немножко по-другому, там я тоже мог бы объяснить основные положения, если они представляет какой-нибудь интерес. The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 17:07, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

 * Благодаря. Меня больше интересовал первый вопрос, большое спасибо! Было б здорово, если б ты мог сделать статью о "себя си". --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 06:16, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Сегодня сделал её. The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 09:01, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

 * Спасибо! Посмотрю ссылки на болгарские словари в другой теме. --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 10:43, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Bulgarian dictionary online?
Hey, do you know a good online dictionary for Bulgarian? Bulgarian<-->English or Bulgarian<-->German would be great, but Bulgarian<-->Russian would do, too. Regards, Miacek (talk) 15:55, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Hallo, Miacek! Ich habe vorwiegend Wörterbücher für die Sprachen, die ich lerne, gesammelt, deshalb zögere ich mit der Empfehlung. Einst bediente ich mich eines gewissen SA Dictionary, der hier zu finden ist. Ich würde ihn als passabel einstufen. Auf uz-translations habe ich vor kurzem diese zwei bulgarisch-russische/russisch-bulgarische Wörterbücher entdeckt. MfG The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 09:01, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Vielen Dank!--Miacek (talk) 10:50, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

WT:RFM
Your input is requested here. Thanks —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 07:53, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

FWOTD focus week
Hi! We're just starting a focus week for the Foreign Word of the Day on terms derived from German, and I was wondering if you could help to translate some of the quotes on featured pages. Specifically, абитуриент needs a translation of a short text, and I would also appreciate it if you could check my translation of the French at vasistas (my French was never any good, now it's worse than my other Romance languages). Thank you! —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 08:31, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi! I translated the sentence from абитуриент. As for vasistas, I would translate le cordon d’un vasistas as the rope from a transom instead of a rope from the transom in compliance with the original text. The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 09:03, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much! OK, I don't know the context of the French quote so following the articles as given would be wise. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 20:06, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

нямам
Another Bulgarian request: we still lack the entries for нямало:, нямаше:, and няма: even though literally hundreds of entries link to them. Would you be as kind as to create these? Many thanks —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 05:52, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅ These are all forms of the verb нямам, the negative form of имам. The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 09:43, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Much appreciated. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 16:50, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

надявам и надявам се
Привет,

Какая лемма у болгарских возвратных глаголов? Форма без "се"? В болгарском викисловаре нет формы "надявам се", но зато есть "надявам". Я сделал из "надявам" перенаправление на "надявам се", чтобы связать перевод hope (глагол) с болгарским викисловарём, вот так: Bulgarian:, но теперь я не уверен, что это правильно. Глагол надявам обозначает "надевать" (put on), не так ли? --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 03:10, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Привет.
 * Да, надявам означает надевать (не только одежду; если только одежду, — обличам). Есть и глагол совершенного вида надяна, тогда как у надявам се нет. Я не уверен, что перенаправление подходит. Я не увидел последовательности в составе категории французских возвратных глаголов, и не только здесь, но и во французском викисловаре (срв. fr:éprendre, fr:soucier, но fr:s’enfuir), не говоря уже о болгарских (для которых аналогичной категории пока нет). The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 12:19, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

 * Спасибо, значит я буду делать переводы с частицей "се", как по-русски, не как по-сербско-хорватски. --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 07:29, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

хамбар
Hey dude, what's up :)

Regarding the etymology of : Proto-Bulgar, really? :) It find really suspicious that a word supposedly borrowed from a Turkic language in the Early Middle Ages could underwent morphological and semantic development reaching the exact same form as the Ottoman Turkish word introduced at the same territory thousand years later. Could you please check the etymology in some real dictionary, the website linked as a reference doesn't really instill much confidence.. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 18:14, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Zdravo, Ivane. I apologise for the procrastinated response. I may have indeed overrated erstwhile the reliability of that source. Therefore, lest it be attributed unnecessary corroboration, I would suggest adding the expression possibly or according to one version. I ventured to add the first one. As for some real dictionary, the Български етимологичен речник (1971-) has not yet been finished, it has attained the letter Т, so Х is out of reach. Feel free to add another versions for the etymology or diminish the assertibility of the information from the extant source by modifying the introductory expression. The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 13:23, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * OK, I've added it as an alternative etymology. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 22:00, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Ругательство
Привет,

Есть ли синонимы болгарского ругательства "путка"? Используются/использовались ли еще слова "пичка", "минджа", "слива", "пизда"? Если да, то какое ударение у "минджа" и "пизда"? Извини за нескромный вопрос :) --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 02:58, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Привет! Я честно признаюсь, что прочитав первый вопрос, я вспомнил только влагалище и слова латинского происхождения (которые не относятся к ругательствам). Слово пизда я впервые встретил в русском языке, не в болгарском, когда мне было лет 20. Я не думал, что это слово есть и в болгарском, но сегодня нашел его в БЕР (этимологическом словаре). Оно там не помечено как диалектное. Слово пичка помечено как диал. и разг. (его я встречал один раз). Слово минджа в четвертом томе, которого нет в сети, поэтому когда я достану его, проверю есть ли оно там, но сегодня я не в состоянии ответить (никогда не встречал). Слово слива никогда не встречал в этом значении, но согласно словарю такое значение засвидетельствовано в софийском ученическом жаргоне, в Плевенской и Ловечской областях. The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 08:20, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

 * Спасибо за подробный ответ. :) --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 08:50, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

власи
Hi! Has the singular of been attested in Bulgarian, to your knowledge? It's mentioned in Gluhak's Hrvatski etimološki rječnik p.676, as well as Vasmer but I couldn't find in any Bulgarian dictionary.. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 17:55, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Zdravo. There is an entry in Български етимологичен речник, том 1, стр. 162 and although I must admit I have never heard this word independently, there are several compounds which are current in Bulgarian such as беловлас (white-haired), власеница (cilice), тъмновлас (dark-haired, the last one is attested in Vazov's works, the others are undoubtedly common) and even a plant species (more species listed in БЕР; I can enumerate them, if you are interested). These however (except the species) might have been borrowed from Russian. The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 16:48, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Blagodarim. I'll look it up in БЕР. Of those compounds that you've mentioned - беловлас is inherited from Common Slavic, власеница is Church Slavonicism, and тъмновлас seems to be a neologism. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 17:08, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Help
Hi. I wanted to know that how am i supposed to link two entries about the same word from different language wikitionaries. --Satdeep gill (talk) 19:31, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi. Here is an example (for French and Chinese). The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 16:48, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Совершенные/несовершенные глаголы
Привет,

Ты не мог бы сделать три списка из Category:Bulgarian verbs - perfective/imperfective/both, пожалуйста?

Это может занять какое-то время, не торопись, но хотелось бы, чтобы эта информация была точной. Если какие-нибудь сложности в определении вида? В русском языке некоторые глаголы на -ировать могут быть двувидовые (русифицировать) или только одного вида (информировать/проинформировать)

Если тебе некогда или неохота, я не обижусь.

Кстати, как тебя зовут, если не секрет?

Заранее спасибо,

Анатолий --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 23:35, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Привет!
 * Хорошо, я попытаюсь начать список. Что касается сложностей, в болгарском аналогичные глаголы -ирам почти всегда двувидовые, глаголов одного вида (среди этих заимствований) немного. Например в случае с информировать/проинформировать перевод обоих на болгарский будет информирам. The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 08:42, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Такой список подойдет? Это первые два десятка. Некоторые ссылки красные, потому что когда я вижу несовершенный глагол в категории, вспоминаю совершенный и отвожу ему место. Если они не нужны, буду упорядочивать только слова, присутствующие в категории, только синие ссылки и устраню красные. The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 09:04, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Спасибо:) -Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 09:06, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

 * Я создал категории Category:Bulgarian imperfective verbs и Category:Bulgarian perfective verbs. Если ты добавишь Preferences->Gadgets->HotCat (easily add / remove / change a category on a page, with name suggestion), то ты сам тоже смог бы добавлять болгарские глаголы к этим категориям (очень легко и быстро). Но я все равно подожду список, если так легче.
 * Меня также интересует наличие в болгарском абстрактных/конкретных глаголов как русские ходить/идти, плавать/плыть, бегать/бежать, носить/нести. Есть ли такие пары в болгарском? Есть ли однократные (semelfactive) глаголы - толкнуть, прыгнуть, стукнуть (сравни с совершенными потолкать, попрыгать, постучать). --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 23:48, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Разделения на абстрактные/конкретные глаголы (ходить/идти, летать/лететь) в болгарском нет. А однократные есть, например дърпам - дръпвам/дръпна (дергать - один раз дергать/дернуть) или хлопам - хлопвам/хлопна (стучать - один раз стучать/стукнуть). Однако в случае с хлопвам и дръпвам в отличие от стукнуть бывают и формы несовершенного вида, когда однократно совершается действие.
 * Я отказался от лишнего раздувания списка несозданными статьями, ограничился имеющимися. The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 16:58, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

 * Привет. Извини, что долго не заглядывал. :) Я не совсем понял, что со списком. Ты его где-то составил? Дай ссылку, пожалуйста. Еще, какое ударение в слове "сладолед"? --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 23:21, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Привет, Анатолий. Список здесь, я дошел до буквы о. Извини за медленное продвижение, постараюсь ускорить шаг. Ударение на е, сладоле́д. The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 06:20, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

T-BOT Verb режа
Could you provide the conjugation of the Bulgarian verb ? --Lo Ximiendo (talk) 19:40, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Polizist
To keep it together, see: User talk:80.133.98.13. -18:33, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
 * BTW (as it has nothing to do with "Polizist"): There's the word "Japanese" in German, which can for example be found at [www.zeno.org/Heiligenlexikon-1858/A/Michael+%2874%29] ("Michael [..], zugenannt Chinosci, ein Japanese, welcher am 28. Sept. 1630 zu Nangasaki für den Glauben an Jesus enthauptet wurde."). It might be older/dated, but it might also be simply rare or might be in use in some regions only (e.g. it might be more common in South and South-East Germany (Swiss, Austria) and less common or even uncommon in North Germany). -18:48, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

hi
sv81.11.219.175 03:30, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 21:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Bulgarian Cyrillic
Hi Bogorm, just wanted to ask you if you know any Bulgarian Cyrillic fonts that are based from famous fonts, i.e. like and. , Bulgarian Cyrillic looks prettier than Russian Cyrillic, as Bulgarian Cyrillic seems to look more like "Latin" and varies more in lower and uppercase forms – AWESOME meeos ！ *  (chōmtī hao /t͡ɕoːm˩˧.tiː˩˧ haw˦˥/) 07:05, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi Awesomemeeos, I have not searched for Bulgarian counterparts of those fonts, but Bulgarian font in Bulgarian is български шрифт, and by searching for „български шрифт Helvetica“ I found some results. The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 20:29, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:23, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you! WMF Surveys, 18:35, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey
Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks! WMF Surveys, 01:34, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

'''If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again.''' We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. WMF Surveys, 00:43, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

слава богу - thank God
Здравей. It seems Bulgarian uses an inflected form of in the expression. Is this an archaic declension fossilised here? --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 01:51, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Привет. Yes, it is. Another example is: предавам Богу дух (perish). Bogorm converſation 08:25, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Мерси. :) --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 10:05, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Count form of час
Hi,

I am a bit confused. Should ALL count forms in Bulgarians be unstressed? How do you pronounce "пет часа"? I'm seeing conflicting descriptions and examples. BTW, do you happen to have a link or a soft copy of "Правописен речник на българския книжовен език"? Or you just rely on Google book searches? Thanks in advance! --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 06:09, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Привет, Анатолий. Я написал насчет часа в основном обсуждении. У меня есть книжное издание этого словаря, ссылки нет, поэтому я упомянул поиск в гуглокнигах на случай, если кому-то еще он может пригодиться. В двухсторонних обсуждениях я буду писать по-русски, потому что пишу быстрее, если не возражаешь. Bogorm converſation 11:30, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
 * It's also on Library Genesis (libgen.is). PUC 11:38, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I found there another book which does not contain "книжовен" in its title and is not authored by Ljubomir Andrejčin(the author of Правописен речник на българския книжовен език). Bogorm converſation 11:44, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes, my apologies, I didn't look closely enough. PUC 11:46, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Нужна помощь со звательным падежом
Привет,

Как здоровье? Извини, что отвлекаю. Нам опять нужна помощь. Ты редко наведываешься и наверное не получаешь наши сигналы.

Помоги нам пожалуйста, разобраться со звательным падежом в Module_talk:bg-noun, если будет время. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 07:46, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Привет, Анатолий! В последнее время у меня больше досуга из-за чрезвычайной ситуации, так что точно буду заходить регулярно. К сожалению у меня нет уверенности насчет звательных форм, когда -е и когда -о при окончании -ица. Предположу, что лучший способ будет проверка засвидетельствованной формы в словаре. В случае с птицей например, только цитата Ивана Вазова приведена там. Пока не жалуюсь на здоровье, а ты? Bogorm converſation 12:02, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Спасибо, у меня тоже хорошо. Пока и работа есть. Да, пока похоже, самая сложная проблема находить правильные формы звательного падежа. К сожалению, словари не очень помогают. Скажи, как лучше, сделать список слов, где есть сомнения? Я до сих пор не до конца понял правило образования для слов на -ка и -ца. Мы ещё вернёмся к теме Module_talk:bg-noun. Спасибо за помощь! Я добавлю "птица" и другие, которые уже знаем. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 12:17, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

We sent you an e-mail
Hello ,

Really sorry for the inconvenience. This is a gentle note to request that you check your email. We sent you a message titled "The Community Insights survey is coming!". If you have questions, email surveys@wikimedia.org.

You can see my explanation here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:48, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

How we will see unregistered users
Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:14, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bogorm


text: снасялия

title: снасялия


text: снасяла

title: снасяла


text: снасялата

title: снасялата


text: снасяло

title: снасяло


text: снасялото

title: снасялото


text: снасяли

title: снасяли


text: снасялите

title: снасялите


text: снасян

title: снасян


text: снасяният

title: снасяният


text: снасяни

title: снасяни


text: снасяните

title: снасяните


text: снасяна

title: снасяна


text: снасяната

title: снасяната


text: снасяно

title: снасяно


text: снасяното

title: снасяното


text: снасяш

title: снасяш


text: снася

title: снася


text: снасяме

title: снасяме


text: снасяте

title: снасяте


text: снасят

title: снасят


text: снасях

title: снасях


text: снасяше

title: снасяше


text: снасяхме

title: снасяхме


text: снасяхте

title: снасяхте


text: снасяха

title: снасяха


text: снасяй

title: снасяй


text: снасяйте

title: снасяйте


text: снесъл

title: снесъл


text: снеслият

title: снеслият


text: снеслия

title: снеслия


text: снесла

title: снесла


text: снеслата

title: снеслата


text: снесло

title: снесло


text: снеслото

title: снеслото


text: снесли

title: снесли


text: снеслите

title: снеслите


text: снесял

title: снесял


text: снесяла

title: снесяла


text: снесяло

title: снесяло


text: снесели

title: снесели


text: снесен

title: снесен


text: снесеният

title: снесеният


text: снесения

title: снесения


text: снесени

title: снесени


text: снесените

title: снесените


text: снесена

title: снесена


text: снесената

title: снесената


text: снесено

title: снесено


text: снесеното

title: снесеното


text: снесеш

title: снесеш


text:
снесе

Pronunciation

Verb

 * 1)  to lay (an egg)

title: снесе


text: снесем

title: снесем


text: снесете

title: снесете


text: снесат

title: снесат


text: снесях

title: снесях


text: снесеше

title: снесеше


text: снесяхме

title: снесяхме


text: снесяхте

title: снесяхте


text: снесяха

title: снесяха


text: снесох

title: снесох


text: снесохме

title: снесохме


text: снесохте

title: снесохте


text: снесоха

title: снесоха


text: снеси

title: снеси


text: спасил

title: спасил


text: спасилият

title: спасилият


text: спасилия

title: спасилия


text: спасила

title: спасила


text: спасилата

title: спасилата


text: спасило

title: спасило


text: спасилото

title: спасилото


text: спасили

title: спасили


text: спасилите

title: спасилите


text: спасял

title: спасял


text: спасяла

title: спасяла


text: спасяло

title: спасяло


text: спасели

title: спасели


text: спасен

title: спасен


text: спасеният

title: спасеният


text: спасения

title: спасения


text: спасени

title: спасени


text: спасените

title: спасените


text: спасена

title: спасена


text: спасената

title: спасената


text: спасено

title: спасено


text: спасеното

title: спасеното


text: спасиш

title: спасиш


text:
спаси

Verb

 * 1)  to rescue, save

title: спаси


text: спасим

title: спасим


text:
спасите

Interjection

 * 1) help!

title: спасите


text: спасят

title: спасят


text: спасях

title: спасях


text: спасеше

title: спасеше


text: спасяхме

title: спасяхме


text: спасяхте

title: спасяхте


text: спасяха

title: спасяха


text: спасих

title: спасих


text: спасихме

title: спасихме


text: спасихте

title: спасихте


text: спасиха

title: спасиха


text: спасете

title: спасете


text: спасяващ

title: спасяващ


text: спасяващият

title: спасяващият


text: спасяващия

title: спасяващия


text: спасяваща

title: спасяваща


text: спасяващата

title: спасяващата


text: спасяващо

title: спасяващо


text: спасяващото

title: спасяващото


text: спасяващи

title: спасяващи


text: спасяващите

title: спасяващите


text: спасяване

title: спасяване


text: спасяването

title: спасяването


text: спасявания

title: спасявания


text:
User talk:84.251.127.235

-staa
Your new entry has been deleted through some hasty oversight. I have asked the admin to please undelete. See undelete request. In fact, you are welcome to create more entries like it, for example: -lla, -sta, -htaa, -ttaa, -taa, -nna, -rra, -illä. ~ heyzeuss 17:29, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

title: User talk:84.251.127.235


text: спасяванета

title: спасяванета


text:
Talk:Fibber McGee's closet

Fibber McGee's closet
The current example sentence is not adequate because it only says something is like Fibber McGee's closet. Equinox ◑ 23:47, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

 * See Citations:Fibber McGee's closet. Some are similes, which shouldn't qualify. Others are metaphorical uses, which should. DCDuring TALK 00:38, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

 * Thanks for the research. I'd say that five or six of your eight should qualify. Equinox ◑ 12:21, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Our definition is "household clutter', whereas most of the citations are just for a clutter sense, not household-specific. — msh210 ℠ 17:02, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Fixed definition and closed, as cited'. Equinox ◑ 21:27, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

title: Talk:Fibber McGee's closet


text: спасяванията

title: спасяванията


text: спасяванетата

title: спасяванетата


text: спасявайки

title: спасявайки


text: спасявал

title: спасявал


text: спасявалият

title: спасявалият


text: спасявалия

title: спасявалия


text: спасявала

title: спасявала


text: спасявалата

title: спасявалата


text: спасявало

title: спасявало


text: спасявалото

title: спасявалото


text: спасявали

title: спасявали


text: спасявалите

title: спасявалите


text: спасяван

title: спасяван


text: спасяваният

title: спасяваният


text: спасявани

title: спасявани


text: спасяваните

title: спасяваните


text: спасявана

title: спасявана


text: спасяваната

title: спасяваната


text: спасявано

title: спасявано


text: спасяваното

title: спасяваното


text: спасяваш

title: спасяваш


text: спасява

title: спасява


text: спасяваме

title: спасяваме


text: спасявате

title: спасявате


text: спасяват

title: спасяват


text: спасявах

title: спасявах


text: спасяваше

title: спасяваше


text: спасявахме

title: спасявахме


text: спасявахте

title: спасявахте


text: спасяваха

title: спасяваха


text: спасявай

title: спасявай


text: спасявайте

title: спасявайте


text: спекъл

title: спекъл


text: спеклият

title: спеклият


text: спеклия

title: спеклия


text: спекла

title: спекла


text: спеклата

title: спеклата


text: спекло

title: спекло


text: спеклото

title: спеклото


text: спекли

title: спекли


text: спеклите

title: спеклите


text: спечал

title: спечал


text: спечала

title: спечала


text: спечало

title: спечало


text: спечели

title: спечели


text: спечел

title: спечел


text: спечела

title: спечела


text: спечело

title: спечело


text:
спечали

Verb

 * 1)  to gain, earn, work for

title: спечали


text: спечех

title: спечех


text:
nuciculteur

Noun

 * 1) someone who grows walnuts

title: nuciculteur


text: спечехме

title: спечехме


text: спечехте

title: спечехте


text: спечеха

title: спечеха


text: спечен

title: спечен


text: спеченият

title: спеченият


text: спечения

title: спечения


text: спечени

title: спечени


text: спечените

title: спечените


text: спечена

title: спечена


text: спечената

title: спечената


text: спечено

title: спечено


text: спеченото

title: спеченото


text: спечеш

title: спечеш


text:
спече

Pronunciation

title: спече


text: спечем

title: спечем


text: спечете

title: спечете


text: спекат

title: спекат


text: спечах

title: спечах


text: спечеше

title: спечеше


text: спечахме

title: спечахме


text: спечахте

title: спечахте


text: спечаха

title: спечаха


text: спекох

title: спекох


text:
Suhttamptune

Etymology
Borrowed from.

Proper noun

 * 1) Southampton English port city

title: Suhttamptune


text: спекохме

title: спекохме


text:
mânea

Etymology
, present active infinitive of, from.

Verb

 * 1)  to spend the night, take shelter (for the night), put up

title: mânea


text:
Steadicam

Etymology
1975, from, from.

Noun

 * 1)  A stabilizing camera mount for hand-held film or video shooting; a camera mounted thus.

title: Steadicam


text: спекохте

title: спекохте


text: спекоха

title: спекоха


text: спечи

title: спечи


text: спестил

title: спестил


text: спестилият

title: спестилият


text: спестилия

title: спестилия


text: спестила

title: спестила


text: спестилата

title: спестилата


text: спестило

title: спестило


text: спестилото

title: спестилото


text: спестили

title: спестили


text: спестилите

title: спестилите


text: спестял

title: спестял


text: спестяла

title: спестяла


text: спестяло

title: спестяло


text: спестели

title: спестели


text: спестен

title: спестен


text: спестеният

title: спестеният


text: спестения

title: спестения


text:
полудявам

Verb

 * 1)  to go mad/crazy, to become insane, to go out of one's mind

title: полудявам


text: спестени

title: спестени


text: спестените

title: спестените


text: спестена

title: спестена


text: спестената

title: спестената


text: спестено

title: спестено


text: спестеното

title: спестеното


text: спестиш

title: спестиш


text: спести

title: спести


text:
полудея

Verb

 * 1)  to go mad/crazy, to become insane, to go out of one's mind

title: полудея


text: спестим

title: спестим


text: спестите

title: спестите


text: спестят

title: спестят


text: спестях

title: спестях


text: спестеше

title: спестеше


text: спестяхме

title: спестяхме


text: спестяхте

title: спестяхте


text: спестяха

title: спестяха


text: спестих

title: спестих


text: спестихме

title: спестихме


text: спестихте

title: спестихте


text: спестиха

title: спестиха


text: спестете

title: спестете


text: спестяващ

title: спестяващ


text: спестяващият

title: спестяващият


text: спестяващия

title: спестяващия


text: спестяваща

title: спестяваща


text: спестяващата

title: спестяващата


text: спестяващо

title: спестяващо


text: спестяващото

title: спестяващото


text: спестяващи

title: спестяващи


text: спестяващите

title: спестяващите


text: спестяване

title: спестяване


text: спестяването

title: спестяването


text: спестявания

title: спестявания


text: спестяванета

title: спестяванета


text: спестяванията

title: спестяванията


text: спестяванетата

title: спестяванетата


text: спестявайки

title: спестявайки


text: спестявал

title: спестявал


text: спестявалият

title: спестявалият


text: спестявалия

title: спестявалия


text: спестявала

title: спестявала


text: спестявалата

title: спестявалата


text: спестявало

title: спестявало


text: спестявалото

title: спестявалото


text: спестявали

title: спестявали


text: спестявалите

title: спестявалите


text:
Template:bn-conj-head

conjugation of

title: Template:bn-conj-head


text: спестяван

title: спестяван


text:
renumé

Adjective

 * 1) renowned; infamous

title: renumé


text: спестяваният

title: спестяваният


text: спестявани

title: спестявани


text: спестяваните

title: спестяваните


text: спестявана

title: спестявана


text: спестяваната

title: спестяваната


text: спестявано

title: спестявано


text: Category:English terms prefixed with lexico-


text: спестяваното

title: спестяваното


text: спестяваш

title: спестяваш


text: спестява

title: спестява


text: спестяваме

title: спестяваме


text: спестявате

title: спестявате


text: спестяват

title: спестяват


text: спестявах

title: спестявах


text: спестяваше

title: спестяваше


text: спестявахме

title: спестявахме


text: спестявахте

title: спестявахте


text: спестяваха

title: спестяваха


text: спестявай

title: спестявай


text: спестявайте

title: спестявайте


text: срещнал

title: срещнал


text: срещналият

title: срещналият


text: срещналия

title: срещналия


text: срещнала

title: срещнала


text: срещналата

title: срещналата


text: срещнало

title: срещнало


text: срещналото

title: срещналото


text: срещнали

title: срещнали


text: срещналите

title: срещналите


text: срещнел

title: срещнел


text: срещнела

title: срещнела


text: срещнело

title: срещнело


text: срещнели

title: срещнели


text: срещнат

title: срещнат


text: срещнатият

title: срещнатият


text: срещнатия

title: срещнатия


text: срещнати

title: срещнати


text: срещнатите

title: срещнатите


text: срещната

title: срещната


text: срещнатата

title: срещнатата


text: срещнато

title: срещнато


text: срещнатото

title: срещнатото


text: срещнеш

title: срещнеш


text: срещне

title: срещне


text: срещнем

title: срещнем


text:
срещнете

Pronunciation

title: срещнете


text: срещнех

title: срещнех


text: срещнеше

title: срещнеше


text: срещнехме

title: срещнехме


text: срещнехте

title: срещнехте


text: срещнеха

title: срещнеха


text: срещнах

title: срещнах