text:
User talk:Wonderfool

malacoderm
I can tell from the source (MW 1913) that "tribe" does not likely coincide with the rank of "tribe". It probably should be construed as "group". The "definition" looks to be etymology-derived, further reducing the likelihood that any single modern taxon corresponds. If I cared I'd just get a few cites, adjust the definition accordingly, and probably mark it obsolete or archaic. DCDuring (talk) 16:35, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Song
I had a dream last night where I was singing parts of this song. I decided to write the whole thing...

I used to rule the words Sysop the first time, second and third Now in the morning I edit alone Sweep the entries I used to pwn

When I was admin thrice Feel the fear in the vandals' eyes Listen to my audios sing Now the sock-king is dead! Long live the king!

One minute I closed RFD Next the RFDs closed on me And I discovered that my reputation stands Upon pillars of salt and pillars of sands

I hear of animals from DCDuring Module wizardry from Benwing Be my mirror, my sword and shield My Wiktionary's in a foreign field

For some reason I can't explain I know Donnanz will quote from RAIL Adminship time the third That was when I ruled the words

It was a wicked and wild sin To go rouge and let vandals back in IP blocks and the sound of drums People couldn't believe what I'd become

Bureaucrats wait For my head on a silver plate Just a puppet on a lonely string Oh, who would ever want to be king?

Sgconlaw is WOTDing Romanophile is still editing Be my mirror, my sword and shield My Wiktionary's in a foreign field

For some reason I can't explain AryamanA tracked my usernames Adminship time the third That was when I ruled the words

Hear Polansky's rants and raving Equinox's drunken entries saving Be my mirror, my sword and shield My Wiktionary's in a foreign field

For some reason I can't explain I know I still want to delete the main Adminship time the third That was when I ruled the words

JJ72 Bassist (talk) 10:07, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Cleanup

 * -al forms in Webster - from catechismal

If you want to edit Wiktionary, please follow the process and don't create separate accounts.
Please read up on the appeals process at Meta and follow that. Please stop making sockpuppets. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:39, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Move to Wiktionary namespace
It seems like User:AryamanA has stopped maintaining this list, so I think it would make more sense to move this page to Wonderfool. This has precedent with pages like WF (redirects here) and. Ioaxxere (talk) 15:06, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I support this move. J3133 (talk) 15:15, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I do not support this move. I originally would have, but I no longer do. Like many people say in WT:V, it's suspicious whenever WF supports something. Daniel.z.tg (talk) 00:35, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
 * : Should this be moved to WT:RFM? J3133 (talk) 10:20, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Uh oh, sounds like Wonderfool's reverse psychology is working on you!
 * —will do. Ioaxxere (talk) 02:49, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Whatever, even if it's reverse psychology. It'll just make me part of the crowd who votes Oppose when WF starts a vote. However I know you will support WF and not like this reasoning because WF started your admin nomination. Daniel.z.tg (talk) 22:09, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Add something to the edit count please
Something like "and honing in on SemperBlotto's second place". Just 3,000 more edits and the silver belongs to WF No hago griego (talk) 21:51, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Not including logs, of course, which nobody cares about No hago griego (talk) 21:52, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
 * How about no. What if I follow User:Ioaxxere's lead and remove another section? Daniel.z.tg (talk) 22:22, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

 * For the record, the count would put WF in a highly respectable third place in the human edit count, after Equinox and SemperBlotto (honing in on that 2nd place though - not including logs).
 * You should just go and try to add that section yourself. Daniel.z.tg (talk) 22:28, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I can't. I'm permanently blocked Thyself be knowne (talk) 22:30, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Removal of "Page moving incident" section
I see the section I wrote was removed in https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=User:AryamanA/Wonderfool&diff=prev&oldid=73424928. I don't want it added back. I added the section in the style of the controversies section in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Wales and other articles about politicians that do this. But then I learned in https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dan_Polansky&diff=prev&oldid=70686085 that WF likes attention. Removing it does avoid giving him further attention. I'm curious, is this reason why you removed the section? Daniel.z.tg (talk) 22:20, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I removed it because practically everything about it was wrong or misleading. I don't have any problem with the "Count" section though Ioaxxere (talk) 22:28, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I put the "Count" section back. Someone else can perform WF's edit request if they want.
 * I suppose once could say "everything about it was wrong or misleading" about my section. I paraphrased quite heavily from the Wikipedia article so what I wrote might not have been very accurate or relevant for WF's case. Daniel.z.tg (talk) 22:35, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Exploration of Unbanning: Dictionary-building more important than any specific rules
the code is more what you'd call "guidelines" than actual rules.- Wonderfool is an interesting editor and person. I would like you all to explore the possibility that Wonderfool be actually allowed to keep some particular account consistently. You may say "Wonderfool is used to getting blocked so it doesn't matter" or you may say "Wonderfool is the most flagrant violator of the rules of Wiktionary, the editor should not be unbanned". However, I believe that rules-based systems are entirely SECONDARY to realities. That is to say: rule breaking is only relevant if it actually, clearly detracts from the dictionary-building project of the website. So any rule that goes beyond protecting that mission is absurd. And a person of reliable willingness to engage in dictionary-building like this person is someone that should be encouraged to edit, in my personal opinion. There is some theoretical loss to Wiktionary because the rules might be seen as too flexible. But in a balancing test of: 1) the dictionary-building work of an editor versus 2) the consistency of rule application, I believe that it is possible that (1) may be outweighed by (2), and as such, the rules are junk. Authority and rules are interesting and valuable but ultimately a secondary consideration, which is consistent with the core spirit of Wiktionary. --Geographyinitiative (talk) 22:51, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

 * I would love for him to be a regular and consistent contributor to Wiktionary if he would follow the process to have his one account unblocked and not use sockpuppets. He doesn't get a pass on the rules. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:42, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

 * See! See! You'd love for the editor to be a regular and consistent contributor! See! That's what I'm talking about, right there! You've seen the value of the editor to dictionary-building. And what I'm saying is that that factor overcomes the rules, because this is not serious business. It's a for-fun, volunteer enterprise, not a religious cult or a government agency or something where strict enforcement of rules is really that important. Justice under the rules is a secondary consideration- the rules are in service to the dictionary-building goal. Added value to the dictionary-building goal is paramount, and if the rules don't serve that goal, it's the rules that are the problem, not the editor. --Geographyinitiative (talk) 01:16, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
 * No. Forgive the extreme example here but "he rapes but he saves" is not acceptable. I'm not asking for anything unreasonable or outrageous: I'm expecting him to follow the same standard everyone else has to follow. It's not okay to be a drunk driver if you're a volunteer firefighter or to commit a little arson if you donate to a soup kitchen. I wish Wonderfool didn't think it's some hilarious game to break the very simple rules, but he does: I can't control what he thinks. It would certainly be nice to have his constructive edits without all of the pointless drama, but here we are. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 10:10, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

RFM discussion: June–August 2023
This page seems to no longer be maintained by User:AryamanA and is of general interest to the Wiktionary community. Also: this wouldn't break any links as long as we turn the old page into a redirect. Ioaxxere (talk) 03:00, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Support per nom. — excarnateSojourner (talk · contrib) 06:34, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
 * : On second thought, I prefer Thadh's suggestion to move it to User:Wonderfool. — excarnateSojourner (talk · contrib) 05:04, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
 * . (Re broken links: : I think Koavf was referring to the user pages of Wonderfool accounts, which were all redirected to User:AryamanA/Wonderfool; double redirects do not work. As there would be many to fix, a bot could help.) J3133 (talk) 07:56, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
 * —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:42, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
 * - There has to be some limit to how much we glorify someone for refusing to behave normally. Project pages are beyond that limit in my view. I'm deleting the Wiktionary namespace page. - TheDaveRoss  22:44, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

 * This is not Wiktionary material, it's userspace material. If you don't want to host it at Aryaman's, host it directly at User:Wonderfool. Thadh (talk) 22:46, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
 * What Ioaxxere mentioned at User talk:AryamanA/Wonderfool but did not here is that Wikipedia uses the project namespace (see subpages at w:Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/List). They have decided (inclduding by four deletion nominations – all kept) that it should be there. J3133 (talk) 23:09, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
 * This is not a page used to help stifle long-term abuse, it is to make WF feel good. A much less valid rationale for a project page. - TheDaveRoss  23:18, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
 * WF is definitely not deserving of a project page dedicated to them. Megathonic (talk) 04:54, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
 * But I welcome anyone to edit it, I was never the one primarily maintaining it (all the fancy code stuff was added by Erutuon iirc). —AryamanA (मुझसे बात करें • योगदान) 18:34, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

RFM discussion: June–August 2023
Not a bad idea either Ioaxxere (talk) 00:02, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

 * It's suspicious that WF supports this move. Daniel.z.tg (talk) 22:25, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
 * @Daniel.z.tg WF moved it to Wonderfool (not User:Wonderfool). Do you mean because WF moved the page anywhere you are opposed to moving it anywhere? — excarnateSojourner (talk · contrib) 16:05, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I don't really know. This time I just decided to concur with the people who opposed WF recently on WT:V.
 * I originally had weak support for this move. I was thinking there was a minor cleanup benefit, and two people supported it. Then WF moved it which caused me to change my mind. Normally WF starting something is only a small negative point and, as seen in the previous vote or two, usually doesn't cause me to change my mind. There I mainly consider the merits of the proposal itself instead of the champion and I found them concretely beneficial. This time I started out at Weak Support so what WF did was able to move me to (Weak?) Oppose. Daniel.z.tg (talk) 16:53, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

 * Keeps it in userspace without implying it "belongs" to any one (non-WF) editor. — excarnateSojourner (talk · contrib) 16:05, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

 * Thadh (talk) 12:18, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

 * , but it should be made clear that it is not Wonderfool’s user page. J3133 (talk) 12:23, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Binarystep (talk) 20:38, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I'd rather delete User:AryamanA/Wonderfool entirely and have all sockpuppet accounts redirect to User:Wonderfool. Including a long list of sockpuppet accounts and their edit totals just adds to the attention that WF craves and encourages their behavior. WF's original userpage could be modified to contain nothing more than a very brief message saying if you were redirected here from a user's page, it's because they're a sockpuppet of WF. Short and to the point, it lets users know who they are dealing with without adding to the attention that WF gets. The page itself would be set to the template editor/admin lock level to prevent WF from using another sockpuppet to modify it. Megathonic (talk) 04:38, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Agreed. User:Ioaxxere, are you going to fix the double redirects (e.g. with AWB)? —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:48, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
 * I also agree, now that the vote to unblock WF has been created. The timing of the resolution of this discussion is unfortunate, I think. It would be better to wait until we see the outcome of the vote. Ah, well. Andrew Sheedy (talk) 03:10, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

Moved. Ioaxxere (talk) 02:01, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

 * All of WF's sockpuppets now need to have the redirect link updated. For whoever wants to do it. Megathonic (talk) 02:07, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

Maintaining the contributions count at User:Wonderfool/sockpuppets
Now that WF is unblocked it's going to be awkward to constantly be updating the contributions count. Is there a way to do it automatically? (We might need a bot.) Ioaxxere (talk) 23:39, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

title: User talk:Wonderfool


text:
User talk:Volants

Hi! It's a bit late to welcome you, as you seem to have found your way around well already - but for the sake of prosperity: Welcome to Wiktionary, and thank you for the work you're doing with German. Fancy adding a box to your userpage at some point? For future reference, our main policies are at WT:ELE and WT:CFI, and other guidelines can be found scattered aroudn the place. You may wish to look at WT:ADE for information on German. Conrad.Irwin 15:39, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

!Xóõ
Hi. I just wanted to thank you for deleting the !xóõ entries that needed to go. I will be marking more for deletion in the near future. It would be greatly appreciated if you, at your leisure, would delete those as well, as they are marked. This is, of course, entirely up to you, but it'd be a huge help. There aren't that many left that need to be deleted. -- Xoolanguage
 * OK. No problem--Volants 16:24, 24 June 2010 (UTC).

Analphabetin, Anhäufung
Analphabetin is the female form of Analphabet:, therefore female. Tbot knew that from the translation section of illiterate: and/or from de:Analphabetin, you changed it. The genitive and plural form of Anhäufung are completely regular as for all female nouns ending in -ung:. de:Anhäufung shows them also correctly; no idea where your versions came from. Apogäum: is another example where you changed the gender incorrectly. While we all certainly appreciate any kind of enthusiasm and while I, in particular, am guilty of having made very similar mistakes, you might want to check the information available online, for example in the German Wiktionary or at leo.org, if you are not entirely sure. Thank you. -- Gauss 20:13, 3 December 2008 (UTC) I am not surprised that such errors happen if you make edits at a rate of (I counted) 198 edits in 80 minutes (15:30-16:49). Also, every German noun has a gender (sometimes two). Countries such as Armenien:) are usually of neutral gender; one could say Das schöne Armenien liegt im Kaukasus. -- Gauss 20:47, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

 * Thank you. I think, that I have understood this mistake. You have right and I will be more cautious in the future. --Volants 11:25, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

FitBot in Portuguese
Hi, I'm interested to run a bot, who generates Portuguese verb forms, similar to your User:FitBot. I already downloaded this Python stuff and the codes from yours and SemperBlotto's bots, which I will change in order to suit Portuguese. What will be the next step, in the process of running my bot? --Volants 08:49, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Some steps that need to happen:
 * You'll need to be able to run Python programs. If you've downloaded "all the stuff", that may not include a format in which it can be run on your computer.  If you're using a UNIX or LINUX computer (or a Mac), then you're set already.  If you're using a PC, you may need to talk to User:SemperBlotto for any assistance with this, as he has a PC.  The Python programs run on your local computer, and pass information to the Wiktionary servers, so you need to be able to run Python code on your computer.
 * You'll need a template for each regular conjugation. If you've read the documentation for FitBot and SemperBlotto's bots, then you've seen the start/stop code and the bit in between.  I have a full txt document template on my machine for each conjugation pattern that I've added.  That can mean 50 or more of those start/stop units in a single txt file, with replaceable dummy text for each verb form.
 * You need to create a bot account, and set up documentation as Semper and I have.
 * You'll have to do a careful test run of the bot. The best way to do this is to find a verb whose spelling/conjugation differ sigificantly from existing Spanish or Galician entries.  This makes checking and cleanup much easier in case something goes wrong.  Watch the run carefully to be certain each verb form is added correctly and under the correct pagename.  You have to re-do this step each time you generate a new conjugation pattern template, and it's a good idea to watch the results of the run each time anyway. Sometimes a bot run aborts while incomplete, or the server may interfere with the addition of one or more verb forms in some way.
 * Announce your intentions to the community, and invite them to inspect your code / test run.
 * Start a WT:VOTE to have your bot given the bot flag, which will allow your bot to run without being blocked and without clogging up Recent Changes with all the additions. Each new task performed by a bot much be community approved.  So, if you've acquired permission for your bot to conjugate Portuguese verbs, then that's all it should do.  If you would like to expand your bot functions, you'll need to repeat from step 4 for that new function.
 * You can read more at Bots, but the steps above aren't altogether clear from that page, unless you read very carefully and have programming experience related to running a bot. Wiktionary is very wary of permitting new bots, in part because of the massive amount of damage they can do in a short time.  So, be forewarned that a relative newcomer, such as yourself, may not get a bot flag.  This can come from not knowing the technical abilities of the new person, or from the fact that the new person is not aware of community norms or of some of the issues involved in page format.  It's also much harder for a non-admin to clean up a situation where a bot went wrong, and newcomers aren't usually admins (yet). --EncycloPetey 15:03, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

pt-verb and pt-conj
I see you already discovered that is working. Good. I wouldn't forget to notify you, but I couldn't make it sooner. There are some new functions, see beijar de língua for example. And please note that there is a new template called to substitute the functions of. --Daniel. 18:36, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Excellent work. I'm pleased about the simplicity of these templates. Also, I hope that soon I can try again with User:Volantsbot. I didn't have a lot of time, for managing the bot, but all the bot informations are still available. Volants 07:44, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

divorciar
Recently, was acting very strangely at the entry divorciar (the symptoms included total lack of the show/hide function and some ugly formatting). Upon some research, I discovered that it was because an asterisk. Anyway, perhaps you would like to know that it's now fixed; the asterisk was successfully removed. --Daniel. 12:39, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

 * Yes, I have noticed that. Thanks. Congratulations for this succesful asteriskectomy! I can see, divorciar has made a full recovery! I think that this asterisk was a foreign body, and how can we say, a slip of my mouse? If there are any more similar surgeries to be operated, I will don my rubber gloves and tackle the punctuation with my wiki-scalpel! --Volants 10:02, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

Cleanup
I have reverted your stikes because a quick check shows many of the problems you struck have not been dealt with. Please do not strike items that have current problems. --EncycloPetey 16:30, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Hmm, this is unfortunate. It was a lot of work ;(. I apologise for that. I striked only entries whose RFC tag has been removed. As a rule, if the specific issues had been cleaned up, I striked it. Is this not conventional? Please don't revert my archving, it's taken ages!--Volants 16:42, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
 * especially, please not this one, as I haven't striked it was another people. --Volants 16:46, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The second list looks fine, but in your previous work, you struck many items whose problems had not been corrected. It is good to help with cleanup, but the problems have to be corrected before an item is struck and removed from the list. --EncycloPetey 17:19, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
 * OK, in the future I will be more vigilant about this. And I will work with other areas of Wiktionary. --Volants 12:41, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

admin? bot?
Hello Volants. I've seen you've made a lot of good edits. Would you liked to be nominated for adminship? Also, while I'm hear, I noticed you have/had a bot. Is that not working any more? Seeing as we have Spanish, Italian, French, Latin and Galician bots already, I'm sure a Portuguese one would be easy to set up. I'll help you out if you have questions about it (about running a bot, that is, not Portuguese [or Polish]). --Rising Sun talk? 23:06, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the adminship offer, but I'm still learning here and must refuse. --Volants 12:48, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * For the bot, I would like to run it again. I think I will try to ask somebody to unblock it, then I can try again. Maybe after the Christmas holiday end. --Volants 12:48, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Actually, maybe it would be useful to be an administrator. If you like, you can nominate me --Volants 15:34, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
 * And 2 months later, there's a vote - please accept at Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2010-02/User:Volants for admin. p.s. I can't help you out anymore with the bot. But thanks for the message --Rising Sun talk? 05:57, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to sysophood. Please add an entry at Wiktionary:Administrators.

May I ask that you always have a second session open on Recent Changes whenever you are editing Wiktionary. You may mark good edits as "patrolled", revert vandalism and stupidity by either deleting new entries or by using the "rollback" function. You may block vandals at your own discretion.

Note: As there are times when no sysop is active, it would be useful if you start your patrolling from the time you last left the system. Cheers. SemperBlotto 19:29, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I'll add an entry there, and will patrol, I hope these tools can improve my editing --Volants 14:46, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
 * After we have reverted a bad edit, should we also then mark the bad edit as patrolled? --Volants 15:01, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes. patrolled just means "nothing to be dealt with here". Conrad.Irwin 15:37, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

German verb forms
Hello, for German verb forms you should use, which is easy to use and automatically adds all relevant categories. -- Prince Kassad 14:45, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Is it easy to use? It doesn't tell me the way to use it! I'll look later. I'll experiment with gehe. --Volants 14:49, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
 * It now has an explanation if you didn't figure it out yet. -- Prince Kassad 14:57, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Acronym categories
Hey, Volants. Please see this edit to see our current standard format for these categories. 50 Xylophone Players talk 14:11, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I thought there would be a more automatic way, but I guess not --Volants 13:25, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Seizing control
Hi. As per your request, I've started using my bot to generate Portuguese entries. Please check the edits - my canary was agasalhar. Please check any missing sections/doubled sections/incorrect information. And if you know of any easy way of including pronunciation, let me know --Rising Sun talk? contributions 05:19, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Also abandonar --Rising Sun talk? contributions 05:39, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
 * abandonar has many mistakes. I hope that these are not repeated in other verbs. Your bot has created a double section in Portuguese - see this edit, where it looks as if it were attempting creation of a French page. And I cannot help you with pronunciation. Try to ask User:Daniel. about hyphenation, which is quite simple. --Volants 12:40, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Votes/2010-04/Voting policy
I urge you to vote. (I don't know which way you'll vote, but I want more voices, especially English Wiktionarians' voices, heard in this vote.) If you've voted already, or stated that you won't, and I missed it, I apologize. —msh210℠ 17:01, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Perhaps I am too late. --Volants 13:08, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Template:pt-adv
You probably shouldn't do tests on a template that's in use. Perhaps create (or /Sandbox). Mglovesfun (talk) 10:35, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
 * OK. Reverted. It was, actually. ACCEL is very complicated! --Volants 10:36, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the Welcome
Thank you for the welcome note you sent to my talk page. Your helpful and collegiate attitude is a credit to Wiktionary. In ictu oculi 13:29, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you. It is a shame that all of your work has been deleted from Christadelphian. I think, this is a good example of when a new user is overwhelmed by the large quantity new messages. I would like to look again at your edits, and include some of the edits into the translation tables. --Volants 22:04, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Rather, thank you. It wasn't a large quantity of new messages, it's simple my policy to withdraw quickly when I come across a combative individual. I must say it seems silly to be generating a lot of work for others (duplication) over what could have a very simple quiet visit, edit, move on. But then I can understand en.wiktionary can have a different culture from en.wikipedia. Btw Polish "chrystadelfiańskich" (aj.gen.pl.) is out there on forums, and is a grammatically correct derivation from the noun in the same way as "luterański" and so on. In ictu oculi 03:53, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. Can I assume that you've taken User:Mglovesfun as the combative individual? He's a very good user, I think, but I haven't been interacting much with him. As you can see, User:Stephen G. Brown is even better! He's the best linguist on this website. For the Polish translations, I'm only a learner, so I cannot help more. Also, I don't know Wikipedia culture, but I hope that you will continue harmonious editing! I think, we don't need any more combative users! --Volants 08:08, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I have my toe back in the water and will see whether it gets bitten again. The good news about Polish is that once someone is reasonably fluent in that they can more or less get by in Czech and Slovak too. Cheers. In ictu oculi 12:13, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I haven't heard this interesting idiom before - dip one's toes in the water. I think that we "bite" newbies often here like the piranha - most newbies are stupid. I think, I've added some Czech entries here, and will attempt to learn it after Polish. --Volants 12:27, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * :) In ictu oculi 19:34, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

chorszy
Hi. I have deleted "chorszy", because it's wrong. Correct comparative form of "chory" is "bardziej chory". Maro 21:23, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you. It appears, that I must study these comparative forms further. --Volants 22:04, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Christadelphian
Hi Volants. Did you see my comment on User talk:In ictu oculi about the Danish translation, before re-adding it? I would really like to see some evidence for its use, besides the Danish Wikipedia.--Leo Laursen – (talk · contribs) 10:45, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

triploidies
I have never seen triploidy: used in a plural form. --EncycloPetey 18:21, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I have seen it! I don't understand anything that is in the books, but it exists. --Volants 18:23, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

patines
Sorry, why delete this just to recreate it? It does exist in French and I think in Spanish too. Mglovesfun (talk) 19:59, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
 * It was incorrectly called a noun, when it is clearly a verb. I used ACCEL to create it correctly. What's the matter? --Volants 20:00, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
 * It had a French section and a Spanish section. I just restore it and changed the ===Noun=== header to ===Verb===. Mglovesfun (talk) 20:10, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
 * ok, now i see. --Volants 20:13, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: User talk:Volants


text:
-förmig

Etymology
From.

Suffix

 * 1) -shaped

title: -förmig


text:
User talk:Dangherous

Leave new messages here. I reply here. --Dangherous 12:14, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

Anarchy
What's this ? — Vildricianus 09:10, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Come on, I rolled it back within 10 seconds. No harm done. --Dangherous 09:13, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Too early to understand your jokes. Welsh humour? — Vildricianus 09:19, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Just Wonderfooling about. --Dangherous 09:50, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Scots
Hiya, good to see some Burns on here. But ‘Scottish English’ is a nebulous term; the Germanic language spoken in Scotland is called Scots. That would be a better tag – at the very least it should be Scots English. Widsith 09:03, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Sure, I know of Scots. But Burns' poems (at least "a red red rose", one that my aunt gave to me recently) are writes in English, so I put it under the heading ====English==== . I don't know much (I don't ken aught if truth be told) about Scots, being an Anglo-Welsh myself. The thing is howe'er, the words in Category:Scottish English have entered the English language. Also, I was ne'er overly happy with most of the contents ofCategory:Regional English, they all seem somewhat nebulous to me. Useful to have them all together though. But sure, if you want to change the category name (thou seemeth to be much more of a wordsmith than I) then go ahead. --Dangherous 09:20, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Ok, cheers. But just to clarify, Burns doesn't write in English – he writes in Scots. luve is not a ‘Scottish’ version of love, it is a cognate word in a separate language which evolved separately from the same source (Old English). Yes, a lot of Scots words have sort of entered English, but people north of the border still like to think of it as a separate language! There isn't really an equivalent in Wales, because you lot hung on to your Celtic a lot better! Widsith 09:30, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Ah right, must've got muddled up 'twixt Scots and Scottish Gaelic, and here's me trying to blag how I know what I'm talking about! From now on I'll try not to dabble in things I'm not familiar with! I'll stick to what I do best on Wiktionary...whatever that may be.--Dangherous 09:43, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Probably quotations, judging from the genius items you've added this morning Widsith 09:48, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah, maybe quotations will be my next mini-project here. It is quite odd, almost nostalgic, sometimes looking through my past contributions here to see what my "area of expertise" in Wiktionary is, and it turns out I've had quite a few: revamping/prettifying pages, Welsh translations (till it was found out I am a fraud whose Welsh skills are really quite shoddy), Biblical English, simple French words, idioms, proverbs, categorisation, vandal-hunting, transwikiing, slang...maybe this is how I've managed to stay on the project for so long, by keeping things fresh (I was meant to just come here, revamp a few pages and scatter some Welsh around the place then leave, but then that nasty SemperBlotto talked me into having a few extra admin buttons and I was coaxed into staying hanging around here). Makes me think what I used to do in the real world.... ah yes, fulltime education. Err, what was the question again, I seem to be rambling. --Dangherous 10:04, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Hello thanks for your reply to the Beer Parlour post Beer Parlour. I've left you a reply there! Cheers--Williamsayers79 07:37, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Sitenotice
YOU SHOULD BE WAY MORE CAREFUL WITH THE SITENOTICE — Vildricianus 11:50, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Sorry Vild! It looked how it should do after I pressed preview. But then the whole site went a bit wobbly. --Dangherous 11:52, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * You got me scared to death! :-) Preview doesn't help when the div tags aren't closed. — Vildricianus 11:56, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Statistics: "good" and "bad" entries
Please see talk page. —scs 00:10, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
 * There's not so much I could add to that talk page. --Dangherous 15:56, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

opština
Hi! No, opština is not plural. It's singular feminine. Plural is "opštine". --Dijan 05:02, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks--Dangherous 15:56, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Index:Aymara
Can you identify these translations as Spanish? If so, could you do the same transwiki job as you did for the Basque things? — Vildricianus 10:59, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Remembering the spoiler atop my userpage:

"Dangherous is by no means a linguist, but an artist, and a mathematician by education. Hence the Babel templates may be slightly exaggerating his linguistic capabilities."
 * However, for you Vild, I shall do the transwiki. I'll first get the OK from Spacebirdy or another Spaniard Wicionarista, and will move the pages over. --Dangherous 09:57, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
 * We don't need an OK from them. It is now ates:Wikcionario:Aymara:Lista de palabras. I guess we will be deleting the English page then. --Dangherous 10:11, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks, perfect! — Vildricianus 10:20, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

categories and catred

 * Oohh, thanks... that'll be a help. I've just been tagging the empty redirects with deletion tags.  There are, however, some categories I see no point in redirecting, so I do tag them for deletion. Beobach972 00:06, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
 * But remember, redirects are cheap.

What happened?
What happened? Andrew massyn 19:42, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

WT:A
Hi, Dangherous.

You're probably already aware of the nomination for removing your sysop status at WT:A. Please comment there as to whether you support the nomination and, if not, you may want to declare whether you still intend to use your role as a sysop to help advance the English Wiktionary project. Rod (A. Smith) 23:44, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

KNOCK IT OFF!
i CAN'T FIND A STEWARD - i'M TRYING i PROMISE!

why are you wasting everyone's time?
You know they can just block you and rollback the database?--64.12.116.13 23:30, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Hi
Hi. You recently blocked me without giving me any warnings. For a whole week too. This goes against policy (though I doubt policy means anything to you), so I request an apology. My contributions may have been vandalism, but no warnings is unfair, especially for such a long block. 67.149.42.90

title: User talk:Dangherous


text:
User talk:Jackofclubs

rfd-kept
See what's displayed at talk:side wall. The pipe character in the text interferes. You need to use or some other workaround. See also Grease pit.—msh210 ℠  20:00, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

 * Hmm, can I ask somebody else to do that? --Jackofclubs 06:30, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Exactly: it's a pain. What Connel did instead was link to the old version of RDF instead of quoting it. That is, before removing the section, click the "permanent link" link (sidebar) (or, after removing it, go into history and select the old revision), get its URL, and link to that from the talkpage; see, e.g., talk:Spanish double l. Deleted entries get the same treatment, but at MediaWiki:Previously deleted entries instead of the entry's talkpage. That's probably the easiest way, and it works for RFV also. The disadvantage of it is that the old discussion is impossible to find unless you know which entry it was about (in which case you look under the entry's talkpage or Previously deleted entries). That is a disadvantage, but may be outweighed by the ease of archiving.   —msh210  ℠  16:06, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

 * I do know about this MediaWiki:Previously deleted entries space, but I decided not to manually archive things there, due to the sheer tediousness/unnecessary bureaucracy - my way is quicker manually, this is the only reason I've been archiving like I do (I was getting fed up with the size of the RFD page, and have been wanting to close these ancient - and at times tedious/pointless/pernickety - discussions). How did we archive things before Connel's archivo-bot came along anyhows? --Jackofclubs 08:05, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm too new an admin to recall, personally; someone else will. Your way of archiving to talk is fine imo: if the whole conversation doesn't display due to template considerations, then people will look at the wiki code and figure it out.   —msh210  ℠  16:09, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Category:Latin past participles
Is there a quick fix to empty Category:Latin past participles? Maybe change something at --Jackofclubs 15:40, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
 * No. Latin entries shouldn't use that template.  These aren't "form of" entries in LAtin but should have full-fledged entries with inflection tables, because they themselves have forms. --EncycloPetey 15:46, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

 * Take a look, for example, at the changes that had to be made to cognatus:, which isn't actually a participle and was listed as coming from a verb that never existed. --EncycloPetey 16:02, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Duplicate heading at RFDO
this edit of mine seems to have caused a duplicate heading and related strange results at WT:RFDO near the bottom of the page concerning the "-s" category. I have tried a few things to eliminate the problem. The change can't be "undone". Do you see anything that might have caused the glitch? In this case the consequences aren't too serious, but I'd hate to do it again. DCDuring TALK 14:43, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

desysop
Hello, please confirm or deny that you requested on Meta removal of administrator rights. Regards, Leinad 15:10, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

blocking
How come he got blocked? I always considered him quite a good editor. Mglovesfun 09:12, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay he admits to using multiple accounts and he messes around quite a lot. For example, he voted against me proposal as an admin on here, but nominated me as an admin on fr.wikt! Still, I don't see many of his edits being reverted or deleted. Mglovesfun (t) 10:51, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
 * See here --Duncan 14:04, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Meister
I'm sorry, I've never edited the page Meister. --Top Cat 14 15:05, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jackofclubs


text:
User talk:Keene

 * 2007 archives
 * Jan 2008 archives
 * 2008 Feb-Mar archives

Latin verb conjugations
Conrad has helped fix the problem of missing wikilinks for Latin. The existing template calls will have to be cleaned up, but this now won't be a problem later for Latin verb conjugations. I just have to updtae documentation for the template. I don't know whether the corresponding Romanian-specific template can be updated in the same way. --EncycloPetey 15:55, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Looks nice. Very nice in fact, a shame I haven't seen it before. I'll add this to my list of interesting things to use for KB2 (my affectionate nickname for my bot-friend)Keene 19:06, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

sock puppeteer
Looks like you tagged this for RfV but forgot to list it. :-) Dmcdevit·t 18:08, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Undeletion of admin's userpage
I don't get it. If he doesn't want to have a user page, what's the big deal? It's not like he deleted his talk page. -- Visviva 21:52, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Maybe i stepped the line there...I'll see if TDR has anything to say about it Keene 21:54, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

fabulous
Yes, that was just me being brainfart-y. Circeus 04:36, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I hope you weren't using that edit to reveal your real identity! Keene 07:30, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Your message
Thanks for your kind words. I'm OK with what you've done, do you think the other users will be, though? 82.46.24.62 18:26, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

 * Yes, I think so. It can be quite frustrating trying to get your entries into Wiktionary as a newbie...occasionally I edit as anonymous editors or with alternative accounts as a newbie, just to see what it's like to "be a newbie", and sometimes users can be a little hostile. Please don't be fazed - normally new users don't get told off and warned as much by so many experienced users like you did today. I guess none of us are familiar with the topic, that we don't particularly want clean up after you, although personally I would call your entries stubs, not mess. Happy editing, Keene 18:32, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. I've added the equivalent appendix for Appendix:-phyte - can you take a look at it and let me know what I need to do to it in order for it to be suitable for Wiktionary? Once you're happy with it, I'll edit -phyte as you suggest, and then move on to the other terms. 82.46.24.62 18:43, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Wiktionary_Appendix deletions
Hi Keene, I have set up the pywikibot to churn slowly through the pages starting with Wiktionary_appendix and delete them, so if you want to do more productive things, go ahead (though if you want to keep deleting it wont do any harm). Conrad.Irwin 12:03, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Awesome, I was losing my soul a bit when munching through those redirects. Keene 12:04, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

cas d'école
Hi there,

Since I've never heard this French phrase before today, I'm not really sure how to translate it into English. However, I asked people on the French Wiktionary to add a defintion about it. So apparently it has two meanings: I hope it could help you. 16@r 12:35, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) a hypothetical situation allowing to understand the limits of a system
 * 2) a typical case, as learned in school
 * Merci 16@r. I think that case study is pretty close, at least for the 2nd definition. "Case studies" are the texts that you find often in text books.Keene 12:46, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
 * fr: def 2 is "textbook case", a real-life case that matches theory perfectly. Case #1 is an example, theoretical case used to study a theory, it's not a case study, which is the application itself of the theory to a real or imaginary case. Circeus 18:54, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Nice to meet you.

 * Hi, Keene. Just came over to say hi after reading your comment. (I'm the one who likes crazy userboxes.) That's a really impressive collection of French language resources on your page, and I'm sure I'm not the first to thank you for amassing them.

 * The first to thank me for them, yes. There's not that many resources there though, compared with what this site as a whole has - these are just the ones I use most regularly. --Keene 18:44, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

 * About the case method (topic above this). Although casebooks generally follow each reading with expository discussion of the points covered, I consider casebooks more like workbooks, or even exercise books, than textbooks in the true sense of the word. However, "textbook" can also refer to a course textbook--the principal volume containing all or most of the assigned readings for that course. And, many courses, canonical example law school courses, use casebooks as their textbooks. Still, to me textbooks, in the true sense of the word, connote something more or less purely expository, laying out the black letter of the subject, akin to hornbooks--higher than a study guide, lower than a treatise. I'm not sure that wrote very well. If it doesn't make sense, never mind.
 * Hmm, I didn't understand most of it, hence I wikified your message! Personally I've only ever come across the term textbook, as I call(ed) them textbooks in school. Keene 18:44, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

One last thing, I may be wrong/projecting here, but I'm wondering if you might have inadvertently omitted a colon from your user page right above the to do list? Kindest regards, Winter/User:Snakesteuben 18:33, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Nope, that was on purpose. Didn't you know that User:Keene is an extremely common emoticon on the internet. If you look closely at the letter, they form the shape of a guy with a nervous twitch in his right eye, with a monocle in his left eye. I use it all the time to imply that I'm trying to look and act sophisticated, but in fact I'm just a Fool........ ;) Keene 18:44, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

10:e
Hi,

I'm not quite sure it *was* a typo when I did it: this diff makes me wonder if not the infl template was smart enough to judge whether it should add a plural "s" or not, when I made those entries... But I'll clean up those entries - I just wonder which other are needed to look up... \Mike 12:04, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok, it seems (as I understood from Robert Ullmann) as the ability was removed when #ifexists started borking out, giving too many "links" to non-existent words/categories. \M

Appendix:-phyte
Hi. Did you have chance to look at this? Thanks 82.46.24.62 20:18, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, I have, and it seems to me that most of the red links fail verification, being invented words with just a handful of Google hits (mostly mention rather than use). I think that this appendix should be deleted. SemperBlotto 07:25, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
 * AS for me, I've lost interest in that page. Keene 09:49, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

title: User talk:Keene


text: posztulátumok

title: posztulátumok


text: narvals

title: narvals


text: népszámlálások

title: népszámlálások


text:
Talk:peut être

peut être
See above, this isn't a verb form (unless pouvoir être suddenly meets CFI) it's just can + be. Very strong delete, Mglovesfun (talk) 09:20, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Very weak delete: extremely common confusion for peut-être listed in all homonymy exercise books. Circeus 17:28, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * in this case seems okay, which would effectively mean deleting the current definition, so I think we might actually be agreeing on this. Mglovesfun (talk) 17:41, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Change to rfd-sense for this very reason. Mglovesfun (talk) 17:45, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Sense removed, Mglovesfun (talk) 19:26, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:peut être


text:
tuota pikaa

Adverb

 * 1) in no time, soon

title: tuota pikaa


text:
Talk:marijuana

As this article is currently protected, may I make a minor suggestion that  be placed on this page:

--AM666999 23:10, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

 * Done. —Stephen (Talk) 13:01, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:marijuana


text:
kylmissään

Adverb

 * 1) in the state of feeling cold, freezing

title: kylmissään


text:
mukiinmenevä

Etymology
From the expression. mukiin is originally the illative plural form of the stem also found in. It has come to be associated with by folk etymology.

Adjective

 * 1)  decent, passable, tolerable, nothing special

title: mukiinmenevä


text:
grupperabat

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) group discount

title: grupperabat


text: grupperabatten

title: grupperabatten


text: grupperabatter

title: grupperabatter


text: grupperabatterne

title: grupperabatterne


text: grupperabats

title: grupperabats


text: grupperabattens

title: grupperabattens


text: grupperabatters

title: grupperabatters


text: grupperabatternes

title: grupperabatternes


text: bilean

title: bilean


text:
achd

Etymology
From, from. Cognate with 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) act statute

title: achd


text: achdannan

title: achdannan


text:
uchd-aodach

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) breastplate
 * 2) bra

title: uchd-aodach


text: uchd-aodaich

title: uchd-aodaich


text: uchd-aodaichean

title: uchd-aodaichean


text:
uchd

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  breast, bosom
 * 2) lap

title: uchd


text: uchda

title: uchda


text: uchdan

title: uchdan


text:
uchd-mhacaich

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) adopt

title: uchd-mhacaich


text: uchd-mhacachadh

title: uchd-mhacachadh


text: uchd-mhacachaidh

title: uchd-mhacachaidh


text: uchd-mhacachaidhean

title: uchd-mhacachaidhean


text:
uchd-mhacachd

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) adoption

title: uchd-mhacachd


text: uchd-mhacachdan

title: uchd-mhacachdan


text:
lastaig

Adjective

 * 1) elastic

Noun

 * 1) elastic

title: lastaig


text: drathaise

title: drathaise


text: drathaisean

title: drathaisean


text:
fo-aodach

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) underwear

title: fo-aodach


text: fo-aodaich

title: fo-aodaich


text: fo-aodaichean

title: fo-aodaichean


text:
other virginity

Noun

 * 1)  The state of having never participated in anal sex.

title: other virginity


text:
solisto

Noun

 * 1) soloist

title: solisto


text: solistoj

title: solistoj


text: soliston

title: soliston


text: solistojn

title: solistojn


text:
motorboten

Verb

 * 1)  to motorboat

title: motorboten


text:
landskommun

Etymology
From, used in Sweden 1863–1970.

Noun

 * 1) a countryside municipality, a parish

title: landskommun


text:
fotbollsspelare

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  footballer ; football player, soccer player

title: fotbollsspelare


text:
uppgå

Verb

 * 1) to amount
 * 2) to join, to merge (into)
 * 1) to join, to merge (into)
 * 1) to join, to merge (into)

title: uppgå


text:
dépaysement

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  exile
 * 2) the feeling of not being at home, in a foreign or different place, whether a good or a bad feeling; change of scenery

title: dépaysement


text:
diskursanalys

Noun

 * 1) discourse analysis (a method pioneered by Michel Foucault)

title: diskursanalys


text:
diskurs

Noun

 * 1) discourse

Etymology
From, from.

Noun

 * 1) discourse

Etymology
From, from.

Noun

 * 1) discourse

Noun

 * 1) a discourse

title: diskurs


text:
synsätt

Noun

 * 1) a way of (intellectually) looking at things; an approach, a view, an outlook

title: synsätt


text:
kvalitetssäkring

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) quality assurance

title: kvalitetssäkring


text:
säkring

Noun

 * 1) an assurance, a security
 * 2)  a fuse

Usage notes

 * Electric fuses are either or.

title: säkring


text:
uppslagsbok

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) an encyclopedia, an encyclopedic dictionary

title: uppslagsbok


text:
User talk:74.57.197.39

sushi
I reverted your edit because sushis has a nentry and does see some use. —Internoob (Disc•Cont) 03:30, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:74.57.197.39


text:
forslow

Etymology
From, , from , , equivalent to.

Verb

 * 1)  To be dilatory about; put off; postpone; neglect; omit.
 * 2)  To delay; hinder; impede; obstruct.
 * 3)  To be slow or dilatory; loiter.
 * 1)  To be slow or dilatory; loiter.
 * 1)  To be slow or dilatory; loiter.
 * 1)  To be slow or dilatory; loiter.

Synonyms

 * See also Thesaurus:procrastinate
 * See also Thesaurus:hinder
 * See also Thesaurus:loiter

title: forslow


text: fore-slow

title: fore-slow


text:
diskursiv

Adjective

 * 1) discursive

Adjective

 * 1) discursive

Adjective

 * 1) discoursive (pertaining to discourse)

title: diskursiv


text:
λ/4 film

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1)  Film having a retardation of a quarter of a specified wavelength, used with a polarizer film to lower the reflectance of a display significantly.

Translations

 * French: lame λ/4, lame quart d'onde
 * Japanese: λ/4板
 * Korean: λ/4판

title: λ/4 film


text:
forslug

Etymology
From, equivalent to.

Verb

 * 1)  To lose, neglect, or destroy by sluggishness.

title: forslug


text:
forshame

Etymology
From, from ; equivalent to en.

Verb

 * 1)  To be ashamed; be greatly ashamed.
 * 2)  To shame; bring reproach on.
 * 3)  To dare; presume; have the face to.

title: forshame


text:
foreshame

Etymology
Meaning unrelated to, but spelling influenced by this prefix.

title: foreshame


text: λ/4 films

title: λ/4 films


text: Category:English terms spelled with Λ

title: Category:English terms spelled with Λ


text:
forshape

Etymology
From, , from , , from + , equivalent to. Cognate with 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Verb
That he which erst a man was formed, Into a woman was forshape, That was to him an angry jape.''
 * 1)  To metamorphose; change the shape of; transform.
 * 2) * late 14th century, John Gower, Confessio Amantis
 * ''Unkindelich he was transformed,
 * 1)  To put out of shape; distort; make misshapen; disfigure.

title: forshape


text:
forshrinken

Etymology
From, equivalent to.

Verb

 * 1)  to shrink up; dry up; wither

title: forshrinken


text:
forsing

Etymology
From, equivalent to.

Verb

 * 1)  To exhaust (oneself) with singing.

title: forsing


text:
motorboot

Etymology 1
Compound of.

Noun

 * 1) motorboat

title: motorboot


text:
memregado

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) self-rule

title: memregado


text:
kamparana

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) peasant

title: kamparana


text:
Jugoslavio

Etymology
From.

Proper noun

 * 1) Yugoslavia

title: Jugoslavio


text: Zagrebo

title: Zagrebo


text:
teatrejo

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) theater (US), theatre (UK) building, playhouse

title: teatrejo


text:
reĝimo

Etymology
From, and , , , , 🇨🇬 all from. Related to,.

Noun

 * 1) regime
 * 2) regimen
 * 3)  mode

title: reĝimo


text:
enprizonigi

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to imprison

title: enprizonigi


text:
opoziciulo

Noun

 * 1) opponent

title: opoziciulo


text:
apogo

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) support

title: apogo


text: enprizonigas

title: enprizonigas


text: enprizonigis

title: enprizonigis


text: enprizonigos

title: enprizonigos


text: enprizonigus

title: enprizonigus


text: enprizonigu

title: enprizonigu


text: enprizoniganta

title: enprizoniganta


text: enprizoniginta

title: enprizoniginta


text: enprizonigonta

title: enprizonigonta


text: enprizonigantaj

title: enprizonigantaj


text: enprizonigintaj

title: enprizonigintaj


text: enprizonigontaj

title: enprizonigontaj


text: enprizonigantan

title: enprizonigantan


text: enprizonigintan

title: enprizonigintan


text: enprizonigontan

title: enprizonigontan


text: enprizonigantajn

title: enprizonigantajn


text: enprizonigintajn

title: enprizonigintajn


text: enprizonigontajn

title: enprizonigontajn


text: enprizoniganto

title: enprizoniganto


text: enprizoniginto

title: enprizoniginto


text: enprizonigonto

title: enprizonigonto


text: enprizonigantoj

title: enprizonigantoj


text: enprizonigintoj

title: enprizonigintoj


text: enprizonigontoj

title: enprizonigontoj


text: enprizoniganton

title: enprizoniganton


text: enprizoniginton

title: enprizoniginton


text: enprizonigonton

title: enprizonigonton


text: enprizonigantojn

title: enprizonigantojn


text: enprizonigintojn

title: enprizonigintojn


text: enprizonigontojn

title: enprizonigontojn


text: enprizonigante

title: enprizonigante


text: enprizoniginte

title: enprizoniginte


text: enprizonigonte

title: enprizonigonte


text: enprizonigata

title: enprizonigata


text: enprizonigita

title: enprizonigita


text: enprizonigota

title: enprizonigota


text: enprizonigataj

title: enprizonigataj


text: enprizonigitaj

title: enprizonigitaj


text: enprizonigotaj

title: enprizonigotaj


text: enprizonigatan

title: enprizonigatan


text: enprizonigitan

title: enprizonigitan


text: enprizonigotan

title: enprizonigotan


text: enprizonigatajn

title: enprizonigatajn


text: enprizonigitajn

title: enprizonigitajn


text: enprizonigotajn

title: enprizonigotajn


text: enprizonigato

title: enprizonigato


text: enprizonigito

title: enprizonigito


text: enprizonigoto

title: enprizonigoto


text: enprizonigatoj

title: enprizonigatoj


text: enprizonigitoj

title: enprizonigitoj


text: enprizonigotoj

title: enprizonigotoj


text: enprizonigaton

title: enprizonigaton


text: enprizonigiton

title: enprizonigiton


text: enprizonigoton

title: enprizonigoton


text: enprizonigatojn

title: enprizonigatojn


text: enprizonigitojn

title: enprizonigitojn


text: enprizonigotojn

title: enprizonigotojn


text: enprizonigate

title: enprizonigate


text: enprizonigite

title: enprizonigite


text: enprizonigote

title: enprizonigote


text:
centrisma

Adjective

 * 1) centrist

title: centrisma


text:
narcissistical

Adjective

 * Of, pertaining to or involved in narcissism or narcissistic behaviour; narcissistic.

title: narcissistical


text:
liberiĝi

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to be freed; to become free

title: liberiĝi


text: liberiĝas

title: liberiĝas


text: liberiĝis

title: liberiĝis


text: liberiĝos

title: liberiĝos


text: liberiĝus

title: liberiĝus


text: liberiĝu

title: liberiĝu


text: liberiĝanta

title: liberiĝanta


text: liberiĝinta

title: liberiĝinta


text: liberiĝonta

title: liberiĝonta


text: liberiĝantaj

title: liberiĝantaj


text: liberiĝintaj

title: liberiĝintaj


text: liberiĝontaj

title: liberiĝontaj


text: liberiĝantan

title: liberiĝantan


text: liberiĝintan

title: liberiĝintan


text: liberiĝontan

title: liberiĝontan


text: liberiĝantajn

title: liberiĝantajn


text: liberiĝintajn

title: liberiĝintajn


text: liberiĝontajn

title: liberiĝontajn


text: liberiĝanto

title: liberiĝanto


text: liberiĝinto

title: liberiĝinto


text: liberiĝonto

title: liberiĝonto


text: liberiĝantoj

title: liberiĝantoj


text: liberiĝintoj

title: liberiĝintoj


text: liberiĝontoj

title: liberiĝontoj


text: liberiĝanton

title: liberiĝanton


text: liberiĝinton

title: liberiĝinton


text: liberiĝonton

title: liberiĝonton


text: liberiĝantojn

title: liberiĝantojn


text: liberiĝintojn

title: liberiĝintojn


text: liberiĝontojn

title: liberiĝontojn


text: liberiĝante

title: liberiĝante


text: liberiĝinte

title: liberiĝinte


text: liberiĝonte

title: liberiĝonte


text:
transformatie

Etymology
Ultimately from. Equivalent to.

title: transformatie


text:
omkeerbaar

Adjective

 * 1) reversible

title: omkeerbaar


text:
Beogrado

Etymology
From.

title: Beogrado


text:
проливать

Verb

 * 1) to spill
 * 2) to shed (light, tears, blood)

title: проливать


text:
vundiĝi

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to be wounded

title: vundiĝi


text:
baroka

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) Baroque

Adjective

 * -, pearl, style, etc.
 * -, pearl, style, etc.

title: baroka


text:
barroco

Etymology
influenced by.

Adjective

 * 1) Baroque

title: barroco


text: barroca

title: barroca


text: barrocos

title: barrocos


text: barrocas

title: barrocas


text:
loĝloko

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) settlement

title: loĝloko


text: harshes

title: harshes


text: harshing

title: harshing


text: harshed

title: harshed


text:
fervoja

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) railway, train , railroad

title: fervoja


text:
klasado

Noun

 * 1) classification

title: klasado


text:
enverguro

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) wingspan

title: enverguro


text:
признавать

Verb

 * 1) to recognize to acknowledge the existence or legality of something
 * 2) to acknowledge, to see, to admit, to own
 * 3) to find, to consider, to declare, to pronounce

title: признавать


text:
disvastiĝo

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) distribution

title: disvastiĝo


text:
binoma

Adjective

 * 1) binomial

title: binoma


text:
koeficiento

Noun

 * 1) coefficient

title: koeficiento


text:
dive bomber

Noun

 * 1)  A bomber aircraft that dives directly at its target in order to drop a bomb with greater accuracy.

Antonyms

 * / level bomber

Translations

 * Arabic: قاذفة انقضاضية
 * Bulgarian: пикиращ бомбардировач
 * Catalan: bombarder en picat
 * Czech: střemhlavý bombardér
 * Danish: styrtbombefly
 * Dutch: duikbommenwerper
 * Finnish: syöksypommittaja
 * French: bombardier en piqué
 * German: Sturzkampfbomber, Sturzbomber, ,
 * Greek: βομβαρδιστικό κάθετης εφόρμησης
 * Hebrew: מפציץ צלילה
 * Hungarian:
 * Icelandic: steypiflugvél
 * Indonesian: pesawat pengebom menukik
 * Italian: bombardamento in picchiata, bombardiere in picchiata
 * Japanese: 急降下爆撃機
 * Korean: 급강하폭격기
 * Norwegian: stupbomber
 * Persian: بمب‌افکن شیرجه‌ای
 * Polish: bombowiec nurkujący
 * Portuguese: bombardeiro de voo picado, bombardeiro de mergulho
 * Romanian: bombardier în picaj
 * Russian:
 * Spanish: bombardero en picado
 * Swedish: störtbombare, störtbombare
 * Thai: เครื่องบินดำดิ่งทิ้งระเบิด
 * Turkish: pike bombardıman uçağı
 * Ukrainian: пікіруючий бомбардувальник
 * Vietnamese: máy bay ném bom bổ nhào

title: dive bomber


text:
ĝenado

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) bothering, botheration; disturbance, molestation

title: ĝenado


text:
поступить

Verb

 * 1) to act, to behave, to do things (in a certain way)
 * 2) to treat (with), to deal (with), to handle
 * 3) to enter, to join, to matriculate
 * 4) to arrive, to come in, to be received, to be forthcoming
 * 1) to arrive, to come in, to be received, to be forthcoming

title: поступить


text: migris

title: migris


text: migros

title: migros


text: migrus

title: migrus


text: migru

title: migru


text: migranta

title: migranta


text: migrinta

title: migrinta


text: migronta

title: migronta


text: migrantaj

title: migrantaj


text: migrintaj

title: migrintaj


text: migrontaj

title: migrontaj


text: migrantan

title: migrantan


text: migrintan

title: migrintan


text: migrontan

title: migrontan


text: migrantajn

title: migrantajn


text: migrintajn

title: migrintajn


text: migrontajn

title: migrontajn


text: migrinto

title: migrinto


text: migronto

title: migronto


text: migrantoj

title: migrantoj


text: migrintoj

title: migrintoj


text: migrontoj

title: migrontoj


text: migranton

title: migranton


text: migrinton

title: migrinton


text: migronton

title: migronton


text: migrantojn

title: migrantojn


text: migrintojn

title: migrintojn


text: migrontojn

title: migrontojn


text: migrinte

title: migrinte


text: migronte

title: migronte


text:
reprodukta

Adjective

 * 1) reproductive

title: reprodukta


text:
nereprodukta

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) nonreproductive

title: nereprodukta


text: reproduktanta

title: reproduktanta


text: reproduktinta

title: reproduktinta


text: reproduktonta

title: reproduktonta


text: reproduktantaj

title: reproduktantaj


text: reproduktintaj

title: reproduktintaj


text: reproduktontaj

title: reproduktontaj


text: reproduktantan

title: reproduktantan


text: reproduktintan

title: reproduktintan


text: reproduktontan

title: reproduktontan


text: reproduktantajn

title: reproduktantajn


text: reproduktintajn

title: reproduktintajn


text: reproduktontajn

title: reproduktontajn


text: reproduktanto

title: reproduktanto


text: reproduktinto

title: reproduktinto


text: reproduktonto

title: reproduktonto


text: reproduktantoj

title: reproduktantoj


text: reproduktintoj

title: reproduktintoj


text: reproduktontoj

title: reproduktontoj


text: reproduktanton

title: reproduktanton


text: reproduktinton

title: reproduktinton


text: reproduktonton

title: reproduktonton


text: reproduktantojn

title: reproduktantojn


text: reproduktintojn

title: reproduktintojn


text: reproduktontojn

title: reproduktontojn


text: reproduktante

title: reproduktante


text: reproduktinte

title: reproduktinte


text: reproduktonte

title: reproduktonte


text: reproduktata

title: reproduktata


text: reproduktita

title: reproduktita


text: reproduktota

title: reproduktota


text: reproduktataj

title: reproduktataj


text: reproduktitaj

title: reproduktitaj


text: reproduktotaj

title: reproduktotaj


text: reproduktatan

title: reproduktatan


text: reproduktitan

title: reproduktitan


text: reproduktotan

title: reproduktotan


text: reproduktatajn

title: reproduktatajn


text: reproduktitajn

title: reproduktitajn


text: reproduktotajn

title: reproduktotajn


text: reproduktato

title: reproduktato


text: reproduktito

title: reproduktito


text: reproduktoto

title: reproduktoto


text: reproduktatoj

title: reproduktatoj


text: reproduktitoj

title: reproduktitoj


text: reproduktotoj

title: reproduktotoj


text: reproduktaton

title: reproduktaton


text: reproduktiton

title: reproduktiton


text: reproduktoton

title: reproduktoton


text: reproduktatojn

title: reproduktatojn


text: reproduktitojn

title: reproduktitojn


text: reproduktotojn

title: reproduktotojn


text: reproduktate

title: reproduktate


text: reproduktite

title: reproduktite


text: reproduktote

title: reproduktote


text:
soleco

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) solitude
 * 2) loneliness

title: soleco


text:
solitud

Noun

 * 1) aloneness, the state of being or living alone
 * 2) a lonely or deserted place
 * 1) a lonely or deserted place

Etymology
. . Compare, which was inherited.

Noun

 * 1) solitude

title: solitud


text:
kolonio

Etymology
Common, from. .

Noun

 * 1) colony

Etymology
, from.

title: kolonio


text:
senvertebrulo

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) invertebrate

title: senvertebrulo


text:
marbirdo

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) seabird

title: marbirdo


text:
akvobirdo

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) waterfowl, waterbird

title: akvobirdo


text:
piedfingro

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) toe

title: piedfingro


text:
halukso

Noun

 * 1) big toe, hallux

title: halukso


text:
Talk:oleum phosphoratum

oleum phosphoratum
Is this Latin or translingual or what? The obsolete tag seems redundant, given Latin is almost never used now. Mglovesfun (talk) 19:07, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
 * It's Latin, yes, and so should not have an "obsolete" tag. Howver, it's New Latin, since the white phosphorous allotrope was unknown prior to about 1669.  --EncycloPetey 23:58, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

title: Talk:oleum phosphoratum


text:
faklingvo

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) specialized language

title: faklingvo


text:
Talk:دين

دين
This was tagged by someone else. Needs the ===Verbal noun===, ===Verb===, and ===Noun=== headings dealing with. Conrad.Irwin 01:16, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

RFC discussion: May 2010
This was tagged by someone else. Needs the ===Verbal noun===, ===Verb===, and ===Noun=== headings dealing with. Conrad.Irwin 01:16, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Why no Sumerian?
𒁲 did/𒁲 di. Lysdexia (talk) 15:25, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

title: Talk:دين


text:
Thread:User talk:Yair rand/newentrywiz.js/Love this New Entry Wizard!!! How can I localize it for Khmer Wiktionary project. Please help!

Hi! Love this wizard! Kindly help guide me to port this wizard to Khmer Wiktionary - thus, it'll be alot more easy for new users to input new entry! Look forward to your reply. Thank you, --វ័ណថារិទ្ធ (Vantharith) 10:21, 5 March 2011 (UTC)


text:
Talk:passant

passant
(French section) Looks like the definitions suffered a few passes through a Google translator or something. (keeper leather industry? chance guest hospitality? built-in bail medicine?) —Internoob (Disc•Cont) 23:46, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

 * I basically just deleted them all. < class="latinx" >Ƿidsiþ 11:14, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

title: Talk:passant


text:
Talk:fond

fond
Uses aren't verbs. 75.105.7.157 22:56, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Hmm, seems to qualify for speedy deletion. But then we'd have to delete fonded and fonding. Is there another meaning which isn't complete nonsense? Mglovesfun (talk) 22:58, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The contributor may have confused this with fawned. 75.105.7.157 20:17, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The verb is valid but I couldn't be bothered to track down cites; I just removed the faulty usexes and added an obsolete tag. < class="latinx" >Ƿidsiþ 11:08, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

title: Talk:fond


text:
ម៉ាស៊ីន

Etymology
Borrowing from.

Noun

 * 1) machine, motor, engine, device

title: ម៉ាស៊ីន


text:
Talk:qex

RFC
Heading for a noun instead of an initialism, could use some more explanation of what QEX actually stands for. Nadando 23:35, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I changed the heading to Initialism. I think it should probably be capitalised, too, but I have not checked that in detail. Equinox 19:30, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

RFV
From rfc. No idea what this is, and no obvious cites in b.g.c. -- Prince Kassad 10:27, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
 * RFV-failed as uncited. - -sche (discuss) 00:18, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:qex


text:
falango

Noun

 * 1)  phalanx
 * 2)  phalanx bone of the finger or toe

title: falango


text:
tenilo

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) handle, haft

title: tenilo


text:
metala

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) metal, metallic

Adjective

 * 1) metallic

title: metala


text:
Talk:discursion

discursion
The definition at present is too vague. — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 19:46, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Been fixed by various people.

title: Talk:discursion


text:
simboleco

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) symbolism

title: simboleco


text:
Talk:button punch

button punch
The POS is "verb", but the definition reads like a noun. I believe this should also be "to button-punch". — Paul G 09:19, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:button punch


text:
symbolisme

Etymology
From.

Also analyzable as.

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) symbolism

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) symbolism

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) symbolism

title: symbolisme


text:
Talk:pasha

pasha
— Beobach 02:49, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

 * Sorted. < class="latinx" >Ƿidsiþ 12:56, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you! — Beobach 05:09, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

RFC discussion: June 2007–November 2009
Tagged but not listed. --Connel MacKenzie 21:13, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Odd punctuation in the definitions, pronunciation unclear --Volants 13:44, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Page visualisation issue
On Chrome page ever lags and sometimes had frozen: problems with editing, I guess. Ardashir (talk) 11:21, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

title: Talk:pasha


text:
Talk:proligerous

proligerous
The comments were "missing a slew of derived terms (medicine and botany)" and "the definitions given, themselves seem sketchy". — Beobach 06:59, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Cleaned. < class="latinx" >Ƿidsiþ 12:42, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you! — Beobach 05:09, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

title: Talk:proligerous


text:
Talk:moonless

Comparative and superlative forms
Hello, I am not native speaker but I do not understand the meaning of comparative and superlative forms. For instance, a night cannot be more moonless than another. There is a moon or not! Same thing for a planet. Are you agree? Pamputt 10:55, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:moonless


text:
Talk:background knowledge

background knowledge
I don't know if this is a neologism or not, but can someone verify it? - Lo Ximiendo 20:48, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
 * As there is no entry there is nothing to either clean up (what this page and are for) or verify (See WT:Attestation. DCDuring TALK  22:27, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

 * From Wordnet--Noun 1. background knowledge - information that is essential to understanding a situation or problem. It is certainly an established term. Leasnam 22:32, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
 * It is clearly not an English idiom. WordNet is a semantic network, not a dictionary. Dictionaries are about lexical units, not conceptual units.
 * A straight vote on the question of which nonidiomatic English terms are worth including would be fine with me. Instead we have various items that are whimsically suggested as being worthy of inclusion even though they conform to no standard for inclusion. If we have some standard that is removed, there is neither a replacement, nor an effort to systematically populate the class allowed. We can't even get a serious effort at a Phrasebook. Instead we get fictional-universe terms. DCDuring TALK 23:22, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

title: Talk:background knowledge


text:
Talk:rehabilitate

rehabilitate
Sense "To rescue from a state of decadence or decrepitude." Sounds like it's out of a 19th Century dictionary. IP added a poorly worded definition which I removed, but in fairness, this definition doesn't cover it, as it's also poorly worded. Mglovesfun (talk) 09:32, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I just rewrote the page. < class="latinx" >Ƿidsiþ 05:39, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

title: Talk:rehabilitate


text:
Talk:I need a bath

I need a bath
This is too vague. What kind of bath does the speaker need? Does the speaker need a bath tub? Do they need to wash themselves? Do they need a bathroom? —CodeCat 14:57, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Seeing as bath has three wildly different meanings, this cannot ever be accurate. It would fail the proposed phrasebook CFI, so send to RFD -- Prince Kassad 15:09, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

 * There is also I need a guide, which simply lists two possible senses. Couldn't the same be done here? —CodeCat 15:15, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
 * For I need a guide it's better because the two meanings are very similar, and from the word guide you can understand the person wants something to lead him, be it a book or a person. You can't do this for bath - you have no idea what the person wants. -- Prince Kassad 15:47, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

I need a bath
This is way too ambiguous. What kind of bath does the speaker need? Does he need a bath tub? Does he need something to wash himself? Does he need a bathroom? There's absolutely no way to guess from this phrase, which makes it unsuitable for a phrasebook. -- Prince Kassad 10:46, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I think, according to usage, most of the time this is going to refer to needing to take a bath. However I think we probably need to research some Google Book hits - for a start, how many are there, and how many refer to taking a bath (washing oneself in a bath tub). I think anything less than 200 for the latter and it could be consider too rare to be "extremely common". Mglovesfun (talk) 11:43, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The form "you need a bath" is more common, unsurprisingly. Maybe we should give that a phrasebook entry? --Mat200 11:59, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Sure. DAVilla 19:34, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Surely I need a shower would be more common and useful anyway... ---> Tooironic 20:23, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Deleted by DAVilla who 'moved' it and replaced the entire content with something else. It's probably best if I do a delete and selective restore to show that DAVilla is the only author of this entry. Mglovesfun (talk) 15:03, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

title: Talk:I need a bath


text:
Talk:Nicolaitan

Nicolaitan
Tagged but not listed (there are about 400 of those). Definition well, isn't a definition. Etymology should be under the etymology header. Also Nicholaitan. Mglovesfun (talk) 14:05, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Done the 'easy' bit, now all we need is a definition and an etymology. Does anyone know what it means? Surely it must come from Ancient Greek. Mglovesfun (talk) 14:42, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

 * Cleaned, pretty much. < class="latinx" >Ƿidsiþ 09:33, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:Nicolaitan


text: limpidissimus

title: limpidissimus


text:
Talk:credit

credit
Sense: A valuable member. Usex: That engineer is a credit to the team.

Definition is not substitutable in the usage example and could not be substituted freely for "a valuable member": "He is a valuable member/*credit of the association". DCDuring TALK 00:55, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The definition is along the right lines, but doesn't work, as you say. Mglovesfun (talk) 11:38, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Changed definition to "A source of value, distinction or honour." Now works with ... to ... SemperBlotto 08:25, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Missing transitive sense?
Chambers 1908 has "to sell or lend to on trust". Is this covered? How is it used, and what would the transitive object be: the person who receives the goods, or the goods themselves? Equinox ◑ 22:29, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

idiom: to someone's credit
[uncountable] 1. to one's credit, deserving of praise: To his credit he did admit his mistake. 2. belonging to one; having as one's accomplishments: He had thirty published articles to his credit. https://www.wordreference.com/definition/credit --Backinstadiums (talk) 12:33, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Use by rollercoaster enthusiasts
I have learned online that rollercoaster enthusiasts speak of having a "credit" or "cred" for each coaster they have ridden, analogous to the birdwatcher's "tick" for each species sighted. Equinox ◑ 19:59, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:credit


text: limpidissimum

title: limpidissimum


text: limpidissimae

title: limpidissimae


text: limpidissimorum

title: limpidissimorum


text: limpidissimarum

title: limpidissimarum


text: limpidissimis

title: limpidissimis


text: limpidissimam

title: limpidissimam


text: limpidissimos

title: limpidissimos


text: limpidissimas

title: limpidissimas


text:
Talk:De Morgan's laws

De Morgan's laws
This term is not a plurale tantum, and needs to be reduced to a soft redirect as a plural of, quod vide for a citation of the singular form (the August 2004 quot.). I'd clean up the entry myself, but I don't know enough about set theory to rewrite the second definition for the singular form with confidence, and nor do I consider myself qualified to correct the translations (assuming that they aren't pluralia tantum either). — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 13:04, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

 * I've added the sense to the entry for the singular and reduced the entry for the plural to a form-of entry, detagging it. I've simply dropped the transliterations. They remain in history. (...where of course no one will think to look for them. Shall we add them with to the entry for the singular?) —msh210℠ (talk) 16:51, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

 * Thanks. Done. — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 17:36, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Cleaned up by msh210. — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 14:28, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:De Morgan's laws


text:
Talk:fast Fourier transform

fast Fourier transform
Definition needs rewording AFAICT: an FFT is a family? —msh210℠ (talk) 16:23, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

 * I've tweaked the def to say that it's a member of a certain family of algorithms, and to specify discrete Fourier transforms. Is it O.K. now? —Ruakh TALK 20:28, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * (If you're asking me:) If you say so. I don't know what an FFT is. —msh210℠ (talk) 20:40, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

 * I do say so. :-P  —Ruakh TALK 15:50, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:fast Fourier transform


text:
ligyrius

Noun

 * 1) ligure

title: ligyrius


text:
Talk:уво

уво
Serbo-Croatian. Not sure whether the entry is intended to have two etymologies. DCDuring TALK 16:16, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

 * Cleaned up. Digging a bit in the history makes clearer what happened: this edit added a more complete etymology, but at a different place in the entry from the etymology that was already there. KassadBot (the new AutoFormat) obscured that by interpreting the two ===Etymology=== sections as separate etymologies, and trying to clean up the entry accordingly. —Ruakh TALK 20:50, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:уво


text: ligyrii

title: ligyrii


text: ligyriorum

title: ligyriorum


text: ligyrio

title: ligyrio


text: ligyriis

title: ligyriis


text: ligyrium

title: ligyrium


text: ligyrios

title: ligyrios


text: ligyrie

title: ligyrie


text:
Talk:brass monkey

brass monkey
In a word, "everything" needs redoing. Mglovesfun (talk) 11:52, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

What's wrong with the etymology and references? DCDuring TALK 03:44, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Nothing, but only because I fixed them. — Beobach 21:42, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Ah, and Ruakh, too. Thanks. DCDuring TALK 00:23, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

title: Talk:brass monkey


text:
liquens

Etymology 1
Present active participle of.

Participle

 * 1) being fluid, being liquid
 * 2) being clear, being transparent
 * 3) being evident, being apparent

Etymology 2
Present active participle of.

Participle

 * 1) being fluid, being liquid
 * 2) flowing
 * 3) melting, dissolving

title: liquens


text:
kandieren

Verb

 * 1)  to candy

title: kandieren


text: liquentes

title: liquentes


text: liquentia

title: liquentia


text: liquentis

title: liquentis


text: liquentium

title: liquentium


text: liquenti

title: liquenti


text: liquente

title: liquente


text: liquentibus

title: liquentibus


text: liquentem

title: liquentem


text:
Talk:De Morganin lait

De Morganin lait
The English translation is non a plurale tantum, so neither, I assume, is this term; the singular form is. Cf. , supra. — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 13:01, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

 * Cleaned up by Hekaheka. — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 14:30, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:De Morganin lait


text: locupletior

title: locupletior


text: locupletius

title: locupletius


text: locupletiores

title: locupletiores


text: locupletiora

title: locupletiora


text: locupletioris

title: locupletioris


text: locupletiorum

title: locupletiorum


text: locupletiori

title: locupletiori


text: locupletiorem

title: locupletiorem


text: locupletiore

title: locupletiore


text: locupletioribus

title: locupletioribus


text:
lorum

Etymology
Possibly from an extinct, but Indo-European language; or, possibly for *vlōrum, from, the same root as of. Compare with 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) thong (leather strap)
 * 2) reins of a bridle
 * 3) whip, lash, scourge
 * 4) girdle
 * 5) slender vinebranch

title: lorum


text:
lora

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to roll

Etymology 1
Maybe from, like 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) pomace wine

Noun

 * 1) boy
 * 2) son
 * 1) son
 * 1) son

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) boy
 * 2) son

Etymology 1
From and.

Verb

 * 1) to roll
 * 2) to wrap

Etymology 2
From.

Noun

 * 1) parrot

Noun

 * 1) spit; sputum

Noun

 * 1)  prostitute
 * 1)  prostitute

title: lora


text: lororum

title: lororum


text:
praktikado

Noun

 * 1) practice

title: praktikado


text:
loricatus

Etymology 1
Perfect passive participle of.

Adjective

 * 1) wearing a ,,  in
 * 2)  wearing a coat of mail
 * 1)  wearing a coat of mail

Etymology 2
Substantivisations of the masculine forms of the adjective in elliptical use for, , etc.

Noun

 * 1)  a  who practises  of the flesh by wearing a  shirt next to the skin (, without padding)
 * 2) a  clad in, an armoured

title: loricatus


text: loricata

title: loricata


text: loricatum

title: loricatum


text: loricati

title: loricati


text: loricatae

title: loricatae


text: loricatorum

title: loricatorum


text: loricatarum

title: loricatarum


text: loricato

title: loricato


text: loricatis

title: loricatis


text: loricatam

title: loricatam


text: loricatos

title: loricatos


text: loricatas

title: loricatas


text:
lumglavo

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) lightsaber

title: lumglavo


text: lucidissimus

title: lucidissimus


text: lucidissima

title: lucidissima


text: lucidissimum

title: lucidissimum


text: lucidissimi

title: lucidissimi


text: lucidissimae

title: lucidissimae


text: lucidissimorum

title: lucidissimorum


text: lucidissimarum

title: lucidissimarum


text: lucidissimo

title: lucidissimo


text: lucidissimis

title: lucidissimis


text: lucidissimam

title: lucidissimam


text: lucidissimos

title: lucidissimos


text: lucidissimas

title: lucidissimas


text: lucidissime

title: lucidissime


text: lucifera

title: lucifera


text: luciferum

title: luciferum


text: luciferi

title: luciferi


text: luciferae

title: luciferae


text:
lucifero

Etymology
, from +, a calque on 🇨🇬. .

Adjective

 * 1)  bearing or giving off light

Noun

 * 1)  name for the planet Venus as the morningstar, daystar

title: lucifero


text: luciferam

title: luciferam


text: luciferorum

title: luciferorum


text: luciferarum

title: luciferarum


text: luciferis

title: luciferis


text: luciferos

title: luciferos


text: luciferas

title: luciferas


text:
margrafo

Noun

 * 1) margrave

title: margrafo


text: luminas

title: luminas


text:
luminat

Etymology
Past participle of.

Noun

 * 1) lighting

title: luminat


text: luminamus

title: luminamus


text: luminatis

title: luminatis


text: luminabo

title: luminabo


text: luminabis

title: luminabis


text: luminabit

title: luminabit


text: luminabimus

title: luminabimus


text: luminabitis

title: luminabitis


text: luminabunt

title: luminabunt


text: luminabam

title: luminabam


text: luminabas

title: luminabas


text: luminabat

title: luminabat


text: luminabamus

title: luminabamus


text: luminabatis

title: luminabatis


text: luminabant

title: luminabant


text: luminavi

title: luminavi


text: luminavisti

title: luminavisti


text: luminavit

title: luminavit


text: luminavimus

title: luminavimus


text: luminavistis

title: luminavistis


text: luminaverunt

title: luminaverunt


text: luminavero

title: luminavero


text: luminaveris

title: luminaveris


text: luminaverit

title: luminaverit


text: luminaverimus

title: luminaverimus


text: luminaveritis

title: luminaveritis


text: luminaverint

title: luminaverint


text: luminaveram

title: luminaveram


text: luminaveras

title: luminaveras


text: luminaverat

title: luminaverat


text: luminaveramus

title: luminaveramus


text: luminaveratis

title: luminaveratis


text: luminaverant

title: luminaverant


text: luminor

title: luminor


text: luminaris

title: luminaris


text: luminamur

title: luminamur


text: luminamini

title: luminamini


text: luminatur

title: luminatur


text: luminantur

title: luminantur


text: luminabor

title: luminabor


text: luminaberis

title: luminaberis


text: luminabimur

title: luminabimur


text: luminabimini

title: luminabimini


text: luminabitur

title: luminabitur


text: luminabuntur

title: luminabuntur


text: luminabar

title: luminabar


text: luminabaris

title: luminabaris


text: luminabamur

title: luminabamur


text: luminabamini

title: luminabamini


text: luminabatur

title: luminabatur


text: luminabantur

title: luminabantur


text: luminem

title: luminem


text: lumines

title: lumines


text: luminet

title: luminet


text: luminemus

title: luminemus


text: luminetis

title: luminetis


text: luminent

title: luminent


text: luminarem

title: luminarem


text: luminares

title: luminares


text: luminaret

title: luminaret


text: luminaremus

title: luminaremus


text: luminaretis

title: luminaretis


text: luminarent

title: luminarent


text: luminaverim

title: luminaverim


text: luminavissem

title: luminavissem


text: luminavisses

title: luminavisses


text: luminavisset

title: luminavisset


text: luminavissemus

title: luminavissemus


text: luminavissetis

title: luminavissetis


text: luminavissent

title: luminavissent


text: luminer

title: luminer


text: lumineris

title: lumineris


text: luminemur

title: luminemur


text: luminemini

title: luminemini


text: luminetur

title: luminetur


text: luminentur

title: luminentur


text: luminarer

title: luminarer


text: luminareris

title: luminareris


text: luminaremur

title: luminaremur


text: luminaremini

title: luminaremini


text: luminaretur

title: luminaretur


text: luminarentur

title: luminarentur


text: luminato

title: luminato


text:
luminate

Etymology
Borrowed from, past participle of , from. See.

Verb

 * 1)  To illuminate.

title: luminate


text: luminatote

title: luminatote


text: luminanto

title: luminanto


text:
luminator

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) skylight

title: luminator


text: luminantor

title: luminantor


text: luminavisse

title: luminavisse


text:
luter

Noun

 * 1) One who uses lute (the material).
 * 2) A musician who plays a lute.

Adjective

 * 1)  liquid

Etymology 1
From the.

Noun

 * 1)  a hand-,
 * 2)  a -  -tub
 * 3)  a baptismal

Etymology 2
See.

title: luter


text: luteres

title: luteres


text: luteris

title: luteris


text: luterum

title: luterum


text:
luteri

Etymology
From the surname of.

Adjective

 * 1) Lutheran

Declension
Indeclinable.

title: luteri


text: luteribus

title: luteribus


text: luterem

title: luterem


text: lutere

title: lutere


text:
ဘာသာဗေဒ

Etymology
, from +, from  +.

Noun

 * 1) linguistics

title: ဘာသာဗေဒ


text:
lycaonice

Adverb

 * 1) in the Lycaonian dialect

title: lycaonice


text: iuj

title: iuj


text: lyrae

title: lyrae


text: lyrarum

title: lyrarum


text: lyris

title: lyris


text: lyram

title: lyram


text:
iun

Etymology
From, from.

Numeral

 * 1)   one

title: iun


text: iujn

title: iujn


text: Katalunio

title: Katalunio


text:
plimulte

Adverb

 * 1) mostly

title: plimulte


text:
islama

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) Islamic

title: islama


text:
Talk:Open Specification Promise

Open Specification Promise
Not dictionary material (also plural, which looks wrong anyway). SemperBlotto 16:16, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Would WT:BRAND apply to this? It is not strictly a brand, but its commercial nature would seem obvious. I could imagine it being used in a way that warranted entry. DCDuring TALK 16:31, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
 * It might become entryworthy if it gets used legally, but I'd bet against it now. OTOH, OSP is already in use and could possibly allow the full term to meet one of the Pawley idiomaticity criteria. DCDuring TALK 16:38, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
 * GNU General Public License seems comparable as a "brand-like" term. I don't think they are suitable for a dictionary. Equinox ◑ 17:20, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not dictionary material. DAVilla 12:19, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, ditto. Mglovesfun (talk) 12:21, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Gone Conrad.Irwin 08:35, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:Open Specification Promise


text: Barcelono

title: Barcelono


text: maciei

title: maciei


text: macierum

title: macierum


text: maciebus

title: maciebus


text: maciem

title: maciem


text: macie

title: macie


text:
Talk:two dimensional universe

two dimensional universe
I'm not sure if this is sum of parts or two encyclopedic. Mglovesfun (talk) 21:16, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

two dimensional universe
The defition essentially says "A universe that is two-dimensional". Unless a proper definition turns up, this is SoP. -- Prince Kassad 17:28, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

 * An aside: IMO the grammar is wrong without a hyphen; it should be two-dimensional universe. Citations may prove me wrong about actual usage. Equinox ◑ 21:08, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, easy SoP. Mglovesfun (talk) 19:10, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Deleted. —msh210℠ (talk) 07:39, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:two dimensional universe


text: Category:Proto-Germanic determiner forms


text:
Talk:get cross

get cross
get: + cross:. DCDuring TALK 19:48, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

 * Agreed. Delete. get: + any adjective is a standard syntactical structure. -- A LGRIF  talk  11:49, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

 * Yeah strong delete, should be covered at get, or possibly Appendix:English collocations of get. Mglovesfun (talk) 11:51, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

 * If ever there was a time when words had multiple meanings....
 * Still, I feel like this should be deleted, weakly. Maybe something like Mglovesfun suggests would be useful. DAVilla 15:35, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. (No need to appendicify as Martin suggested: get collocates with every adjective I can think of offhand.) —msh210℠ (talk) 21:23, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

 * Delete. —Ruakh TALK 03:51, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

 * Strong delete. ---> Tooironic 04:13, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Deleted. Mglovesfun (talk) 14:21, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:get cross


text:
Talk:cada año

cada año
Looks SOP to me--Plowman 20:57, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, collocates with loads of things. Mglovesfun (talk) 11:53, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Agreed. Delete. And in the translations for yearly(adverb) the Spanish entry should be as two separate words. -- A LGRIF  talk 11:56, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Done. DAVilla 15:28, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Strongly disagree. This project is targeted at English speakers, and since the probably non-idiomatic phrase is the best translation for a single word term in English, it should be defined here.  Let's not forget that people use Wiktionary in a multitude of different ways and just because we ourselves don't use it in a particular way doesn't mean we should prevent others from using it so. -  17:29, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * But an English speaker won't know it's the translation of a single term in English until he looks it up, so why would he look up the words together? —msh210℠ (talk) 21:25, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * We assume that users will figure that out with all of our multi-word terms, regardless of idiomaticity. Also, I will reiterate that we need to be thinking about more than just the "type-in-the-search-box" users, more people see Wiktionary content elsewhere than here. -  21:46, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * What use-case do you think this entry fulfills? —Ruakh TALK 21:52, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * SOP. Keep deleted. —msh210℠ (talk) 22:07, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * This could have standed a little while longer before being deleted for the non-admin users who might agree with TDR to be able to see, but delete it in any case. —Internoob (Disc•Cont) 02:31, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
 * English speakers still have the translations of yearly as cada año. If they run across the phrase in Spanish and look up cada and año separately, they will get the meaning. Your argument borders on saying that the term doesn't have to be idiomatic in the target language, but that is the standard. DAVilla
 * The problem with TheDaveRoss's argument is you could justify almost any non-English phrase with it. Like he says "probably non-idiomatic phrase is the best translation for a single word term in English". Do we also want cada día, cada semana, cada ora, cada minuto (etc.) Mglovesfun (talk) 08:20, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Not sure how that is a problem. If we are concerned with how other languages relate to English, we ought to have multi-word terms if they are the best translation for a single word term in English.  Obviously if there is no set phrase, if the foreign language term is just a definition in the foreign language, it should not be included, but for set phrases like cada año they should be here. -  11:46, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I strongly agree with TheDaveRoss in the above point point. This is IMHO also how most printed dictionaries are organized.Matthias Buchmeier 12:17, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
 * But why? Presumably you think that if we have an entry for, then some user will someday benefit from it. How? —Ruakh TALK 12:21, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Suppose that someone is looking for the English translation of, and tipes it into the search-bar. Of course if he doesn't get a hit because is not included, he could still translate it as its SOP, i.e. each year:. On the other hand he might not find the common translation yearly:.Matthias Buchmeier 14:25, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't understand. If someone is looking for the English translation of and he translates it as each year:, where's the problem? OTOH, if we agree that being able to find the common translation yearly: is reason enough for inclusion, then that would imply that we should also have the entry each year: with a synonyms - yearly sub-section. -- A LGRIF  talk  18:45, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
 * But why would someone even think to look up ? It just so happens that it's a single word in English, but who would guess that? —Ruakh TALK 21:10, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Good call, isn't there anualmente anyway? Deleted previously and not restored. Mglovesfun (talk) 14:23, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:cada año


text: Category:Proto-Germanic pronoun forms

title: Category:Proto-Germanic pronoun forms


text:
Talk:head in the clouds

have one&
Recommend a move to head in the clouds. Even one of the usex in the entry agree with me. -- A LGRIF  talk 12:02, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Good idea, keeping the redirect. DCDuring TALK 14:35, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Ok. Done. -- A LGRIF  talk 12:50, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Support (a bit late, I know). Mglovesfun (talk) 12:59, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Just wondering why my idiom examples keep getting deleted from the discussion section. They are relevant to the page. I am using it to teach my students, can you please just keep the discussion section opened for 24hrs before taking it down. Thanks.

 * We have very strict formatting standards, which you flouted by inserting random text with nonstandard headers.
 * A dictionary is about the words and phrases themselves as words and phrases, not about the concepts they express, so adding examples of usage that don't include the phrase is a waste of space.
 * Your sentences aren't particularly good as usage examples even when they do contain the phrase.
 * Your sentences aren't all that good, period. Please find somewhere else to demonstrate overripe pseudo-poetic blather to your students. Thanks. Chuck Entz (talk) 14:11, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:head in the clouds


text:
Talk:sens dessus dessous

sens dessus dessous
NISOP? — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 14:46, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

 * Keep. Seems idiomatic enough to me. Also, there's a lot of information on fr:sens dessus dessous that would justify inclusion on its own. —Internoob (Disc•Cont) 18:47, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

 * Keep, same logic. Mglovesfun (talk) 22:04, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

 * Sure. RFDpassed. — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 10:16, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:sens dessus dessous


text: ath-bheachda

title: ath-bheachda


text: ath-bheachdan

title: ath-bheachdan


text:
Talk:Walt Disney

Walt Disney
The only purported definitions are for his full name, and two organizations that are essentially of his own creation, or dependent sources. All link to Wikipedia entries, not Wiktionary entries. To be includible this should have attested uses from independent sources. Eclecticology 07:50, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

 * Personally, delete. WT:CFI says there is no consensus about what to include, so in the end it comes down to preference, hence delete. Mglovesfun (talk) 22:01, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

 * The person will be disallowed by the vote on names of individuals. Although there should be a way to include company names that have become household words, at present they are strictly not allowed by CFI. This applies to both the entertainment company and its filming subsidiary. Delete, reluctantly. DAVilla 06:35, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per DAVilla's argument. —msh210℠ (talk) 07:40, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
 * delete. WT:CFI does not states that it comes down to preference, it states that all words are includable. But this is not a single word, and the actual sense is any person with Walt as his first name and Disney as his surname, which is not interesting at all from the linguistic point of view. The same applies to pronunciations: pronunciations at Walt and Disney are sufficient. Lmaltier 07:17, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Deleted. —msh210℠ (talk) 16:25, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:Walt Disney