text:
nmu

Phrase

 * A: hey
 * B: 'sup?
 * A: nmu
 * A: nmu

title: nmu


text:
duŝi

Etymology
Compare.

Verb

 * 1)  to shower, douche

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: duŝi


text:
hbu

Phrase

 * A: 'sup
 * B: nm, hbu?
 * B: nm, hbu?

title: hbu


text: duŝas

title: duŝas


text: duŝis

title: duŝis


text: duŝos

title: duŝos


text: duŝus

title: duŝus


text: duŝu

title: duŝu


text:
duŝejo

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) a shower room

title: duŝejo


text: duŝejon

title: duŝejon


text: duŝejojn

title: duŝejojn


text: duŝejoj

title: duŝejoj


text: elefantinon

title: elefantinon


text: elefantinoj

title: elefantinoj


text: elefantinojn

title: elefantinojn


text:
Talk:chignon

Why use Roman numerals?

title: Talk:chignon


text: ĉimpanzon

title: ĉimpanzon


text: ĉimpanzojn

title: ĉimpanzojn


text: ĉimpanzoj

title: ĉimpanzoj


text: ĉimpo

title: ĉimpo


text: Template:short for

title: Template:short for


text: Category:eo:Cycling

title: Category:eo:Cycling


text: danĝeron

title: danĝeron


text: danĝeroj

title: danĝeroj


text: danĝerojn

title: danĝerojn


text: Category:eo:Rail transportation

title: Category:eo:Rail transportation


text: trajnon

title: trajnon


text: trajnoj

title: trajnoj


text: trajnojn

title: trajnojn


text:
User:Lexicografía/Grammerz

The Seven Deadly Grammar Sins

 * 1) Thou shalt not ever use a preposition to end a sentence with.
 * 2) Thou shalt not even think to ever split thine infinitive.
 * 3) The passive voice shall never be used by anyone.
 * 4) Thou shalt not ever make plurals with apostrophe's.
 * 5) There are alot of things people say that ain't words, irregardless of the evidence. Thou shalt not use them!
 * 6) Double negatives aren't never to be accepted.
 * 7) And thou shalt not start thy sentences with "however", "and", or "but".

title: User:Lexicografía/Grammerz


text:
suolistomato

Noun

 * 1) mawworm, maw-worm any parasitic worm that infests the stomach

Hyponyms

 * or ,
 * or ,
 * or ,
 * or ,
 * or ,
 * or ,
 * or ,

title: suolistomato


text:
koukkumato

Noun

 * 1) hookworm parasitic worm, especially the species and

title: koukkumato


text:
halkiomato

Noun

 * 1) schistosome, blood fluke parasitic worm

title: halkiomato


text:
piiskamato

Noun

 * 1) whipworm parasitic roundworm of the species

title: piiskamato


text:
Rhymes:English/ʌntʃən

Two syllables

 * luncheon
 * nuncheon
 * puncheon
 * scuncheon
 * truncheon

title: Rhymes:English/ʌntʃən


text:
kuripot

Adjective

 * 1) stingy; miserly

Etymology
Probably borrowed from.

Adjective

 * 1) stingy; niggardly

Etymology
Probably borrowed from.

Adjective

 * 1) stingy; niggardly

Adjective

 * 1) stingy; spendthrift; miserly

Noun

 * 1) tightwad; miser; stingy person

title: kuripot


text: tyane

title: tyane


text: otoko no ko

title: otoko no ko


text: おとこのこ

title: おとこのこ


text:
Tsino

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1)  Chinese person
 * 2)  Chinese language
 * 1)  Chinese language

Adjective

 * 1)  Chinese

title: Tsino


text:
Tsekwa

Etymology
Possibly reborrowed in from, which was possibly originally from as well, through.

Proper noun

 * 1)  the Chinese people, language, or culture; Chink

Adjective

 * 1)  Chinese; chinky

Usage notes

 * Usage of the term is usually particularly offensive or provocative as a derogatory ethnic slur from its crude or pejorative connotations in the past, especially to Chinese Filipinos.

Etymology
Possibly from a of  or a, according to Zorc (1993).

Noun

 * 1)  Chinaman; Chink

Adjective

 * 1)  Chinese; Chink

title: Tsekwa


text:
血痕

Noun

 * 1) bloodstain

Noun

 * 1) bloodstain

title: 血痕


text: deffer

title: deffer


text:
User:Venku Tur'Mukan

Hello, all! See my page at Wikipedia!

title: User:Venku Tur'Mukan


text:
deff

Adverb

 * 1)  definitely

title: deff


text: has it going on

title: has it going on


text: having it going on

title: having it going on


text: had it going on

title: had it going on


text: glüht

title: glüht


text:
Talk:Cockaigne

On page 606 of the June 1972 Printing of the Joy of Cooking there is a recipe for "...cake cockaigne", with reference to a New York Times Food editor. The cake when made with very ripe plums was certainly a very "luxurious" tasting one, and I can see the connection. However the usage was not that of a noun of the country as in the definition given. Also - what would the proper pronunciation and stress placement be? Peter, Mara, BC

 * It is pronounced similarly to cocaine, except with cock instead of coke. —Stephen (Talk) 05:28, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

title: Talk:Cockaigne


text:
suklaalevy

Noun

 * 1) chocolate bar, chocolate slab flat chocolate bar, usually with multiple rows of detachable bits

title: suklaalevy


text:
tribufu

Noun

 * 1)  ugly woman

title: tribufu


text:
gortepap

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) a kind of barley porridge

title: gortepap


text:
giant roundworm

Noun

 * 1) A species of roundworm,, the largest and most common parasitic worm in humans, causing ascariasis.

Translations

 * Arabic: إِسْكَارِس
 * Chinese:
 * Mandarin:
 * Finnish:
 * Galician: lombriga
 * Ingrian: värttänämato
 * Portuguese:
 * Russian: челове́ческая аскари́да
 * Turkish:

title: giant roundworm


text:
caniphobia

Noun

 * 1) An irrational fear or hatred of dogs or other canines; cynophobia.

title: caniphobia


text:
Appendix:Variations of "album"

The word “album” appears in many languages with many variations in the use of capitalization, punctuation, diacritics, and in other scripts.

Capitalization and punctuation

 * album
 * Album

Diacritics

 * albúm
 * albüm
 * albûm
 * albům
 * álbum
 * àlbum

Other scripts

 * Cyrillic
 * албум

title: Appendix:Variations of "album"


text:
Appendix:Variations of "sou"

The word “sou” appears in many languages with many variations in the use of capitalization, punctuation, diacritics, and in other scripts.

Capitalization and punctuation

 * sou
 * Sou
 * SOU
 * sou-
 * so'u

Diacritics and ligatures

 * sōu
 * sòu
 * sǒu
 * sóu
 * šou
 * só·-ū

Other scripts

 * そう

Combinations with numbers

 * sou1
 * sou3
 * sou4

Homophones

 * so
 * sow

title: Appendix:Variations of "sou"


text:
voĉsintezilo

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) voice synthesizer, vocoder

title: voĉsintezilo


text:
bayak

Etymology
From, from.

Noun

 * 1) monitor lizard

Etymology
From.

Adverb

 * 1)  recently

title: bayak


text:
rapida metalroko

Etymology
+

Noun

 * 1) speed metal (music)

title: rapida metalroko


text:
lap belt

Noun

 * 1)  A seat belt that passes over the hips and does not itself provide restraint to the upper body (although it may be part of a larger system another component of which does provide upper-body restraint).

Translations

 * Finnish: sylivyö

title: lap belt


text:
damna metalroko

Etymology
+

Noun

 * 1) doom metal (music)

title: damna metalroko


text:
balak

Noun

 * 1) poem

Etymology 1
.

Adjective

 * 1) spotted, blemished

Etymology 2
Probably from, from , from.

Etymology 3
From, from. .

Noun

 * 1)  log: the trunk of a dead tree, cleared of branches; any bulky piece as cut from the above, used as timber, fuel etc.
 * 2)  double tiles, doublet tiles: a tile that has the same pips-value on each end.

Noun

 * 1) plan; intention; purpose
 * 2) calculation; computation
 * 1) calculation; computation

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  trouser leg

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) a beam (of timber)

title: balak


text:
balkmak

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  to glitter

title: balkmak


text:
verflüssigen

Verb

 * 1) to liquefy, to liquify

title: verflüssigen


text:
başmak

Etymology
From, from.

Noun

 * 1)  various sorts of mostly flat-bottomed shoes: sandal, clog, slipper

title: başmak


text:
User:Robin Lionheart/Template:test

This is a test to see if I understand how to make subst templates. 1= 2=

title: User:Robin Lionheart/Template:test


text:
User:Robin Lionheart/test

Note:This template works for all noun forms, proper noun forms, adjective forms, verb forms, participles, and participle forms.

{{subst:#if:{{{ipa|}}}|==Esperanto==

Pronunciation
}}
 * ==Esperanto==
 * ==Esperanto==

===a=== anta a

title: User:Robin Lionheart/test


text:
User:Robin Lionheart/eo animal

A subst: template to generate semantic relations terms for animals.

 * 1:Esperanto root
 * 2:English name of animal
 * 3:(optional) Esperanto hypernym
 * 4:(required if 3 used) English for hypernym
 * skip:(optional) (1 or anything else) Skip the Noun, eo-noun, definition
 * q:(optional) prepend generic animal name to following venery words
 * iĉ:(optional) term of venery for male (ex. buck)
 * id:(optional) term of venery for kid (ex. kit)
 * in:(optional) term of venery for female (ex. doe)
 * uk:(optional) (1 or specialized term) for animals we neuter: if set to anything, generate castrated male hyponym
 * aĵ:(optional) (fur, meat, or specialized meat name) for animals we eat or wear: if set to anything, generate meronym (ex. pork)
 * ar:(optional) (1 or term of venery) for animals that run in packs: generate holonym for a pack of this animal
 * pl:(optional) English plural name of animal (ex. mice)
 * a:(optional) (1 or adjective) adjective form of this animal (ex. bovine, porcine, elephantine)
 * cat:add Category:eo:____

Mind: If there's no terms of venery for the animal in question, pro

Example
kok

{{ subst: #if:{{{skip|}}}||

Noun
}}
 * 1)

Hyponyms
{{ subst: #if:1| {{ subst: #if:{{{uk|}}}|* {{l|eo|{{{1}}}uko|gloss=castrated male {{{2}}}{{ subst: #ifeq:{{{uk|}}}|1||, {{ subst: #if:{{{q|}}}|{{{2}}}}} {{{uk}}}}}}}}} {{ subst: #if:{{{3|}}}{{{m|}}}|

Hypernyms

 * , }}

{{ subst: #if:{{{aĵ|}}}|

Meronyms

 * }}

{{ subst: #if:{{{ar|}}}|

Holonyms

 * }}

{{ subst: #if:{{{a|}}}|

Derived terms
}}
 * }}
 * Category:eo:

title: User:Robin Lionheart/eo animal


text: Category:tr:Volleyball

title: Category:tr:Volleyball


text:
fakoĉero

Etymology
From, , both from , from  +.

Noun

 * 1) warthog

title: fakoĉero


text: Category:tr:Tennis

title: Category:tr:Tennis


text: Category:tr:Racquet sports

title: Category:tr:Racquet sports


text:
unsemantic

Adjective

 * 1) Not semantic.

title: unsemantic


text:
коренизация

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) korenizatsiya, korenization

title: коренизация


text: Category:Russian terms suffixed with -ация


text:
incurrable

Adjective

 * 1) That can be incurred.

title: incurrable


text: salauds

title: salauds


text: cutworks

title: cutworks


text:
adpositionally

Adverb

 * 1)  In an adpositional manner.

title: adpositionally


text: avifaunae

title: avifaunae


text:
avifaunal

Adjective

 * 1) Of or pertaining to avifauna.

title: avifaunal


text:
skimboarder

Noun

 * 1) One who takes part in the sport of skimboarding.

title: skimboarder


text: skimboarders

title: skimboarders


text:
wolfskin

Noun

 * 1) The skin of a wolf.

Translations

 * Finnish: sudennahka, sudentalja
 * German:

title: wolfskin


text: wolfskins

title: wolfskins


text:
horseskin

Noun

 * 1) The skin of a horse, or leather made therefrom.

title: horseskin


text: horseskins

title: horseskins


text:
nonconfused

Adjective

 * 1) Not confused.

title: nonconfused


text:
nonincurred

Adjective

 * 1) Not having been incurred.

title: nonincurred


text:
foot-in-mouth disease

Etymology
Humorous conflation of and.

Noun

 * 1)  A tendency to make remarks that are embarrassingly wrong or inappropriate.

Translations

 * Chinese:
 * Mandarin:
 * Finnish: tapa möläyttää
 * German: von einem Fettnäpfchen ins Nächste treten
 * Romanian:

title: foot-in-mouth disease


text:
resyllabification

Noun

 * 1)  The process or result of resyllabifying.

Translations

 * French: ,

title: resyllabification


text: resyllabifications

title: resyllabifications


text:
resyllabify

Verb

 * 1)  To divide into syllables in a new, different way.

title: resyllabify


text: resyllabifies

title: resyllabifies


text: resyllabifying

title: resyllabifying


text: resyllabified

title: resyllabified


text:
clubless

Adjective

 * 1) Without a club (in various senses).

title: clubless


text:
User:Robin Lionheart/eo animal adj

A subst: template to generate semantic relations terms for animals.

 * 1:Esperanto root
 * 2:English name of animal
 * 3:English adjective form (ex. bovine, porcine, elephantine)
 * 4:Esperanto hypernym adjective (ex. mamula)
 * 5:English hypernym adjective (ex. mammalian)
 * cat:add Category:eo:____

Example
kok

==Esperanto==

Adjective
{{ subst: #if:{{{4|}}}{{{m|}}}|
 * 1)

Hypernyms
}}

Related terms

 * Category:eo:

title: User:Robin Lionheart/eo animal adj


text: kokaj

title: kokaj


text: kokajn

title: kokajn


text:
Template talk:reference-news

text/passage
Is it actually possible to specify the text/passage of the citation? I'm not seeing it. Mglovesfun (talk) 10:24, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

title: Template talk:reference-news


text:
Thread:User talk:Bequw/redactar

I'm pretty sure it's not intentional to have your subpage transcluded there.

title: Thread:User talk:Bequw/redactar


text:
-edo

Suffix

 * 1)  member of taxonomic family named after an animal

Etymology
See.

Etymology
From.

Etymology
.

title: -edo


text: Category:Esperanto terms suffixed with -edo


text:
δωδεκαρχία

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  A small unit of 12 men in the Greek army during the years 1828–1829.

title: δωδεκαρχία


text:
kameledo

Noun

 * 1)  camelid (member of the Camelidae taxonomic family)

title: kameledo


text: analitikoj

title: analitikoj


text: analitikon

title: analitikon


text: analitikojn

title: analitikojn


text: kameledon

title: kameledon


text: kameledoj

title: kameledoj


text: kameledojn

title: kameledojn


text:
analizoj

Verb

 * 1) to analyse

title: analizoj


text: analizon

title: analizon


text: analizojn

title: analizojn


text:
ekvo

Noun

 * 1)  a member of the Equus genus (which includes horses)

title: ekvo


text:
ekvedo

Noun

 * 1)  equid (member of the  taxonomic family)

title: ekvedo


text:
kassen

Etymology
An old essive form of.

Adverb

 * 1)  here

title: kassen


text:
borstkas

Etymology
Compound of.

Noun

 * 1) chest, thorax, ribcage

title: borstkas


text: borstkasje

title: borstkasje


text: borstkassen

title: borstkassen


text:
prute

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) coolness

Etymology
Cognate with 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1) to haggle

Etymology
Cognate with 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1) to haggle

title: prute


text: ribbenkastje

title: ribbenkastje


text: ribbenkasten

title: ribbenkasten


text:
castan

Etymology
From (compare modern 🇨🇬), from  or  (modern 🇨🇬), with influence from the native suffix.

Noun

 * 1) chestnut

Etymology
(19th century), possibly earlier via. The Aromanian and Megleno-Romanian equivalents of the word are likely directly inherited from Latin.

Noun

 * 1) chestnut tree

Etymology
From (compare modern 🇨🇬), from  or  (modern 🇨🇬), with influence from the native suffix.

Noun

 * 1) chestnut nut

title: castan


text: castain

title: castain


text: castanan

title: castanan


text:
craobh-geanmchno

Noun

 * 1) chestnut tree

title: craobh-geanmchno


text: craoibhe-geanmchno

title: craoibhe-geanmchno


text: craobhan-geanmchno

title: craobhan-geanmchno


text:
vertebro

Etymology
Borrowed from and.

Noun

 * 1)  a vertebra, a chine bone

title: vertebro


text:
ĥordulo

Noun

 * 1)  a chordate, member of the Chordata taxonomic phylum

title: ĥordulo


text: ĥordulon

title: ĥordulon


text: ĥorduloj

title: ĥorduloj


text: ĥordulojn

title: ĥordulojn


text: craoibhe

title: craoibhe


text: craobhan

title: craobhan


text:
craobh-geanmchno-fhiadhaich

Noun

 * 1) horse chestnut tree

title: craobh-geanmchno-fhiadhaich


text: craoibhe-geanmchno-fhiadhaich

title: craoibhe-geanmchno-fhiadhaich


text: craobhan-geanmchno-fhiadhaich

title: craobhan-geanmchno-fhiadhaich


text: anaroj

title: anaroj


text: anaron

title: anaron


text: anarojn

title: anarojn


text: animalon

title: animalon


text: ekvedoj

title: ekvedoj


text: animaloj

title: animaloj


text: animalojn

title: animalojn


text: ekvedon

title: ekvedon


text: ekvedojn

title: ekvedojn


text: factotumpje

title: factotumpje


text: animeoj

title: animeoj


text: animeon

title: animeon


text: animeojn

title: animeojn


text: anizoj

title: anizoj


text: anizon

title: anizon


text: anizojn

title: anizojn


text: ankroj

title: ankroj


text: ankron

title: ankron


text: ankrojn

title: ankrojn


text: antaŭoj

title: antaŭoj


text: antaŭon

title: antaŭon


text: antaŭojn

title: antaŭojn


text: antaŭparoloj

title: antaŭparoloj


text: antaŭparolon

title: antaŭparolon


text: antaŭparolojn

title: antaŭparolojn


text: antaŭtukoj

title: antaŭtukoj


text: antaŭtukon

title: antaŭtukon


text: antaŭtukojn

title: antaŭtukojn


text: coarde vocale

title: coarde vocale


text: anteroj

title: anteroj


text: anteron

title: anteron


text: anterojn

title: anterojn


text: antikvaĵoj

title: antikvaĵoj


text: antikvaĵon

title: antikvaĵon


text: antikvaĵojn

title: antikvaĵojn


text: antonimoj

title: antonimoj


text: antonimon

title: antonimon


text: antonimojn

title: antonimojn


text: anuroj

title: anuroj


text: anuron

title: anuron


text: anurojn

title: anurojn


text: User:JackBot/test

title: User:JackBot/test


text:
dar gracias

Verb

 * 1) to give thanks
 * 2) to say grace

Conjugation

 * See dar.

title: dar gracias


text:
magico-

Etymology
Combining form of.

Prefix

 * 1) magic, magical.

title: magico-


text:
gorilo

Etymology
Ultimately from. Compare 🇨🇬 and 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) gorilla

Etymology
From, from , , , , , , all ultimately from.

Pronunciation

 * or

Noun

 * 1) gorilla

title: gorilo


text: goriloj

title: goriloj


text: gorilon

title: gorilon


text: gorilojn

title: gorilojn


text: collegiates

title: collegiates


text: User:JackBot/frfromsite.py

title: User:JackBot/frfromsite.py


text: anĝelinoj

title: anĝelinoj


text: anĝelinon

title: anĝelinon


text:
versicolour

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1)  Having changing or varied colours.
 * , II.2.4:
 * neat gardens, full of exotic, versicolour, diversely varied, sweet-smelling flowers, and plants in all kinds […].

title: versicolour


text: anĝelinojn

title: anĝelinojn


text: anĝeloj

title: anĝeloj


text: anĝelon

title: anĝelon


text: angeling

title: angeling


text:
aŭstralopiteko

Noun

 * 1)  an australopith, an extinct hominid primate of the  genus from the Pleistocene period, ancestor of the Homo genus.

title: aŭstralopiteko


text: angeled

title: angeled


text: anĝelojn

title: anĝelojn


text: apogeoj

title: apogeoj


text: apogeon

title: apogeon


text: apogeojn

title: apogeojn


text: Category:eo:Paleontology

title: Category:eo:Paleontology


text: apogées

title: apogées


text: apologioj

title: apologioj


text: apologion

title: apologion


text: apologiojn

title: apologiojn


text: apotekoj

title: apotekoj


text: apotekon

title: apotekon


text:
paleontologio

Noun

 * 1) paleontology

title: paleontologio


text: apotekojn

title: apotekojn


text: paleontologion

title: paleontologion


text: araboj

title: araboj


text: arabon

title: arabon


text: arabojn

title: arabojn


text: paleontologon

title: paleontologon


text: paleontologoj

title: paleontologoj


text: paleontologojn

title: paleontologojn


text:
Thread:User talk:Bequw/redactar/reply

Yep. Fixed.

title: Thread:User talk:Bequw/redactar/reply


text: biologion

title: biologion


text:
цацка

Noun

 * 1) toy

Etymology
From, from a source also giving 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, of uncertain origin, but assumed to be an imitative/children's nursery word.

Noun

 * 1)  toy
 * 2)  knickknack, trinket, tchotchke, tsatske
 * 1)  knickknack, trinket, tchotchke, tsatske

Noun

 * 1)  toy

title: цацка


text: Category:Esperanto terms suffixed with -ologo


text: citologoj

title: citologoj


text: citologon

title: citologon


text: citologojn

title: citologojn


text: meteorologon

title: meteorologon


text: meteorologoj

title: meteorologoj


text: meteorologojn

title: meteorologojn


text:
Talk:NIFO

Can this inflect like a normal noun? Mglovesfun (talk) 14:27, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, either with or without hyphen (I don't know which is preferred). So NIFOj, NIFOn, NIFOjn or NIFO-j, NIFO-n, NIFO-jn. Googling gives both. Decapitalized "nifo" also exists. --JorisvS 16:19, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:NIFO


text: elefanton

title: elefanton


text: elefantoj

title: elefantoj


text: elefantojn

title: elefantojn


text: arbaraj

title: arbaraj


text: arbaran

title: arbaran


text: arbarajn

title: arbarajn


text:
hoff

Etymology
From, from , from , from. Cognate with 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) courtyard
 * 2) farmyard

Etymology
From, from , from , from. Cognate with 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) farmstead

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) a court

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) a court

Etymology
Of cy origin.

Adjective

 * 1) dear, beloved
 * 2) favourite
 * 3) fond (of)

Usage notes
Unlike most Welsh adjectives, hoff precedes the noun it modifies, causing the noun to undergo the soft mutation.

title: hoff


text:
lavotabulo

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) washboard

title: lavotabulo


text: lavotabulon

title: lavotabulon


text: lavotabuloj

title: lavotabuloj


text: lavotabulojn

title: lavotabulojn


text: arenoj

title: arenoj


text: arenon

title: arenon


text: arenojn

title: arenojn


text: lavu

title: lavu


text: areoj

title: areoj


text: areon

title: areon


text: areojn

title: areojn


text: aritmetikon

title: aritmetikon


text: arsenikon

title: arsenikon


text: artifikoj

title: artifikoj


text: artikoj

title: artikoj


text: artifikon

title: artifikon


text: artikon

title: artikon


text: artifikojn

title: artifikojn


text: artikojn

title: artikojn


text: artriton

title: artriton


text:
वचन

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) promise, word, oath, vow
 * 2) word, utterance, speech
 * 1) word, utterance, speech
 * 1) word, utterance, speech

Etymology
.

Adjective

 * 1) speaking
 * 2) eloquent

Noun

 * 1) speaking, utterance
 * 2) pronunciation
 * 3) statement, mention
 * 4) speech, sentence, word (,, etc.)
 * 5) grammatical rule
 * 6) instruction, order (,, etc.)
 * 7) sound, voice
 * 8)  number
 * 9) promise
 * 10) rumor
 * 11) dry ginger

title: वचन


text:
hiperteksto

Noun

 * 1)  hypertext

title: hiperteksto


text: hipertekston

title: hipertekston


text: hipertekstoj

title: hipertekstoj


text: hipertekstojn

title: hipertekstojn


text:
विभक्ति

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) division, piece of
 * 2)  inflection

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) separation, partition
 * 2)  declension of nouns, declensional suffixes (,, etc.)
 * 3) distinction
 * 4) modification
 * 5) portion
 * 6) share of inheritance
 * 7) a certain division of a sāman
 * 8) a certain high number

title: विभक्ति


text:
Template talk:causative form of

Template:causative form of
Not used anywhere. Might someday find a better use, but I doubt it, or it would've been in use already. —CodeCat 14:51, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
 * My talk page comment was "Not used anywhere, could conceivably be deleted. Unless it can be used, within reason.". I stand by that, I don't mind unused templates if they can potentially be used. For this one, I don't know. Mglovesfun (talk) 15:03, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note that there already is which does the same thing. —CodeCat 15:43, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I think they could be merged then, since causative form of use but causative of doesn't. Delete the redirect afterwards (bad entry title). Mglovesfun (talk) 18:23, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
 * How would I go about merging? Sounds like it's a wiki feature I didn't know about. —CodeCat 19:18, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Essentially you rename Template:causative form of to Template:causative of, delete the page to make way for the move, then restore all versions. You have to be a sysop to do it because of the deletion/restoration. Mglovesfun (talk) 05:40, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
 * That's what I've done with the redirect deleted. Sorry for not saying so earlier. Mglovesfun (talk) 16:44, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Stricken, then. —CodeCat 18:38, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

title: Template talk:causative form of


text:
Template talk:ch-noun

Template:ch-noun
Wrong and unused. Chamorro does not have gender, and does not (generally? ever?) form plurals by adding -s. Existing Chamorro noun entries use. (One entry did use this, but it seemed to be erroneous, and has failed RFV.) —Ruakh TALK 02:02, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
 * It is just a carbon copy of . delete -- Prince Kassad 05:21, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
 * No, it's a carbon copy of . —Ruakh TALK 05:52, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Not that it really matters in this case... -- Prince Kassad 08:06, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Could just do a total rewrite, though. Let me have a go. Mglovesfun (talk) 09:03, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
 * OK (for better clarity), rfd'd version was this. Mglovesfun (talk) 09:06, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Still delete, sorry. The template is no longer wrong — thank you — but now it's just a clone of . At some point, our Chamorro editor(s) may want to create an actual that actually does something useful — generates a default plural, say, or uses a specific standardized term for the dual — at which point plain  may become retroactively wrong in existing entries that were using it to mean, unless special pains are taken to make it be backward-compatible. Or, alternatively, they may never want anything like this at all, and they may stick to  because it works with all parts of speech whereas  only works with nouns (and mis-works with adjectives). —Ruakh TALK 09:15, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Suits me (and I agree with you), note that seems to be a copy of . Mglovesfun (talk) 09:24, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

title: Template talk:ch-noun


text:
Template talk:crime

Template:crime
Not a context. Mglovesfun (talk) 12:13, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
 * No real idea what to say about this, except delete. -- Prince Kassad 12:15, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete It is currently used in rape, among other seven entries, but not improving them as far as I can see. Also, "crime" is rather subjective as it varies between legislations. --Daniel. 17:10, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Deleted. Mglovesfun (talk) 15:27, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

title: Template talk:crime


text:
dierezo

Noun

 * 1)  dieresis, a diacritic mark ( ¨ ) placed over the second of two consecutive vowels to indicate that the second vowel is to be pronounced separately.

Usage notes
Two dots over a vowel ( ¨ ) indicates a dieresis in some languages, and an umlaut in others. The diacritical mark itself is called.

title: dierezo


text:
Template:Han etym/documentation

Shows ancient forms of a character, as well as a list of characters that share the same phonetic component. See for an example, and see the the Wikimedia project on the ancient forms.

Parameters
None required.

 * Character to apply template with, if different from pagename
 * Character to apply template with, if different from pagename

 * If, then suppresses display of historical forms
 * If, then suppresses display of historical forms

 * If, then suppresses display of phonetic series
 * If, then suppresses display of phonetic series

Other forms
As of this writing, there are very few samples of, , and on Commons —  is the only character with a full set, and the naming of the files isn’t standardized. See the code there to include these forms.

TemplateData
{	"params": {}, "description": "Shows ancient forms of a character, as well as a list of characters that share the same phonetic component", "format": "\n" }

title: Template:Han etym/documentation


text:
umlaŭto

Noun

 * 1)  umlaut, a diacritic mark ( ¨ ) used in Germanic languages to indicate a back vowel becoming a front vowel.

Usage notes
Two dots over a vowel ( ¨ ) indicates a dieresis in some languages, and an umlaut in others. The diacritical mark itself is called.

title: umlaŭto


text: dierezon

title: dierezon


text: dierezoj

title: dierezoj


text: dierezojn

title: dierezojn


text: umlaŭton

title: umlaŭton


text: umlaŭtoj

title: umlaŭtoj


text: umlaŭtojn

title: umlaŭtojn


text: Category:Turkish blends

title: Category:Turkish blends


text: Category:Mustelids

title: Category:Mustelids


text:
còmhdach cruaidh

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) hardcover, hardback

title: còmhdach cruaidh


text: Category:eo:Mustelids

title: Category:eo:Mustelids


text:
còmhdach bog

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) softcover, paperback

title: còmhdach bog


text: còmhdaich bhuige

title: còmhdaich bhuige


text: còmhdaichean boga

title: còmhdaichean boga


text: còmhdaich chruaidh

title: còmhdaich chruaidh


text: còmhdaichean cruaidh

title: còmhdaichean cruaidh


text:
còmhdach

Etymology
From. Cognate with 🇨🇬 and 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) cover

title: còmhdach


text: còmhdaichean

title: còmhdaichean


text:
còmhdachadh

Noun

 * 1) upholstery
 * 1) upholstery

title: còmhdachadh


text: còmhdachaidh

title: còmhdachaidh


text: còmhdachaidhean

title: còmhdachaidhean


text:
User:Robin Lionheart

Alternative forms

 * ليننهرتا ربن
 * ·𐑮𐑪𐑚𐑦𐑯 ·𐑤𐑲𐑩𐑯𐑣𐑸𐑑
 * 𐐡𐐱𐐺𐐮𐑌 𐐢𐐴𐐲𐑌𐐸𐐪𐑉𐐻
 * ロビン・ライオンハート (獅子心)
 * 로빈 라이온하트 (사자심장)
 * Робин Лаиънхарт (Львиное )
 * Ρόμπιν Λίονχαρτ (Λεοντόκαρδος)

Proper noun

 * 1) Usonian programmer with a degree in Simulation and Game Design
 * 2) Editor of many categories at the Open Directory Project
 * 3) Author of an eponymous website and blog.

Bookmarks

 * Category:Requests (Esperanto)
 * CAT:SD

Words of the day

 * atheophobia
 * dressage
 * greenwash
 * Higgs boson
 * pankration
 * phillumenist
 * philtrum
 * röck döts
 * shuttlecock
 * sparge
 * Tinker to Evers to Chance

title: User:Robin Lionheart


text: Gündüz

title: Gündüz


text:
adalı

Etymology
From, equivalent to.

Noun

 * 1) islander

title: adalı


text:
capen

Verb

 * 1) To look for, search after.
 * Long may they search ere that they find that they after cape.
 * 1) To gaze or stare.
 * This Nicholas ever caped upward into the air.

title: capen


text:
capar

Etymology

 * probably derived regressively from.

Verb

 * 1) to castrate

Etymology
From (13th century), from, derivative of , from.

Verb

 * 1) to castrate

Etymology
From, from , derivative of , from.

Verb

 * 1)  to castrate to remove the testicles of

Etymology
, derivative of, from.

Verb

 * 1) to castrate
 * 2) to cut off
 * 1) to cut off

title: capar


text: capane

title: capane


text: òranaichean

title: òranaichean


text: luchd-seinn

title: luchd-seinn


text: seinneadaire

title: seinneadaire


text: seinneadairean

title: seinneadairean


text: mnà-seinn

title: mnà-seinn


text: mnathan-seinn

title: mnathan-seinn


text: fir-seinn

title: fir-seinn


text: mnatha

title: mnatha


text: mnà

title: mnà


text: mnathan

title: mnathan


text:
Talk:scenius

Found in WIRED MAGAZINE Oct 2010 pg. 122. Also found on kottke.org. The following was also on Kottke.org four factors that are important in nuturing scenius: according to Kevin Kelly:

1. Mutual appreciation -- Risky moves are applauded by the group, subtlety is appreciated, and friendly competition goads the shy. Scenius can be thought of as the best of peer pressure. 2. Rapid exchange of tools and techniques -- As soon as something is invented, it is flaunted and then shared. Ideas flow quickly because they are flowing inside a common language and sensibility. 3. Network effects of success -- When a record is broken, a hit happens, or breakthrough erupts, the success is claimed by the entire scene. This empowers the scene to further success. 4. Local tolerance for the novelties -- The local "outside" does not push back too hard against the transgressions of the scene. The renegades and mavericks are protected by this buffer zone

title: Talk:scenius


text:
Flannras

Etymology
Compare 🇨🇬.

Proper noun

 * 1) Flanders

title: Flannras


text: Flannrais

title: Flannrais


text:
bose

Verb

 * 1)  To strike the ground with an object in order to determine, from the resulting sounds, what lies underground.

Noun

 * 1) meeting, encounter

Noun

 * 1) oar; rowing tool

Etymology
From the noun.

Noun

 * 1) strawbed

Verb

 * 1) to sprinkle waste straw around

Verb

 * 1) to hurry

Noun

 * 1) snake

Noun

 * 1) the European black nightshade

title: bose


text:
sgreamhaich

Verb

 * 1) disgust, nauseate

title: sgreamhaich


text: sgreamhachadh

title: sgreamhachadh


text: sgreamhachaidh

title: sgreamhachaidh


text: sgreamhachaidhean

title: sgreamhachaidhean


text:
sgreamh

Noun

 * 1) disgust, loathing, detestation

title: sgreamh


text: sgreamha

title: sgreamha


text: sgreimhe

title: sgreimhe


text: in route

title: in route


text:
o que não mata, engorda

Etymology
lit. 'what does not kill people, makes them fatter'.

Proverb

 * 1) every substance is certainly either edible or lethal
 * 2) what doesn't kill you makes you stronger hardships build moral character

title: o que não mata, engorda


text:
termless

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) Not terminating; having no end, limit, or boundary
 * 2) inexpressible; indescribable
 * 1) inexpressible; indescribable
 * 1) inexpressible; indescribable

Synonyms

 * ; see also Thesaurus:endless or Thesaurus:continuous
 * , ; see also Thesaurus:indescribable

Translations

 * Bulgarian:
 * Polish:

title: termless


text:
sgaiteach

Adjective

 * 1) sharp, witty
 * 2) sarcastic, biting, satirical

title: sgaiteach


text:
User talk:189.226.188.178

Please use Sandbox for making tests, thanks, — lexicógrafo | háblame — 18:14, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

title: User talk:189.226.188.178


text:
bloigh

Noun

 * 1) bit, piece
 * 2) fraction mathematics
 * 3) blog

title: bloigh


text: bloighe

title: bloighe


text: bloighean

title: bloighean


text: Category:gd:Internet

title: Category:gd:Internet


text: Category:gd:Networking

title: Category:gd:Networking


text:
bloigh dheicheach

Noun

 * 1) decimal fraction

title: bloigh dheicheach


text:
bloigh chumanta

Noun

 * 1) vulgar fraction

title: bloigh chumanta


text: bloighe cumanta

title: bloighe cumanta


text: bloighean cumanta

title: bloighean cumanta


text: bloighe deicheach

title: bloighe deicheach


text: bloighean deicheach

title: bloighean deicheach


text:
deicheach

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1)  decimal

title: deicheach


text:
ionad deicheach

Noun

 * 1) decimal place

title: ionad deicheach


text: ionaid dheicheach

title: ionaid dheicheach


text: ionadan deicheach

title: ionadan deicheach


text:
truaill-chainnt

Noun

 * 1) slang

title: truaill-chainnt


text: truaill-chainntean

title: truaill-chainntean


text:
truaill

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) sheath, scabbard

Declension
Alternative plural:

Etymology
From, from.

Verb

 * 1) pollute, contaminate

title: truaill


text:
truailleadh

Noun

 * 1) pollution, contamination
 * 1) pollution, contamination

title: truailleadh


text: truaillidh

title: truaillidh


text:
proporție

Etymology
, from.

Noun

 * 1) proportion

title: proporție


text: truaillidhean

title: truaillidhean


text:
User:Calvin Leung Pang-Yun

I'm Calvin

title: User:Calvin Leung Pang-Yun


text:
User talk:Calvin Leung Pang-Yun

I'm Calvin

title: User talk:Calvin Leung Pang-Yun


text:
tachd

Verb

 * 1) choke, smother, strangle, throttle

title: tachd


text:
tachdadh

Noun

 * 1) suffocation
 * 1) suffocation

title: tachdadh


text: tachdaidh

title: tachdaidh


text: tachdaidhean

title: tachdaidhean


text:
blansíroz

Etymology
From, from , from. With the suffix.

Verb

 * 1)  to blanch

title: blansíroz


text: піксэляў

title: піксэляў


text: mùchaidh

title: mùchaidh


text: mùchaidhean

title: mùchaidhean


text:
vastaveto

Noun

 * 1) ripost

title: vastaveto


text:
bombardament

Etymology
or. .

Noun

 * 1) bombardment

title: bombardament


text:
Talk:forewarn

Link to old discussion
BTW, an interesting old discussion at the references desk here: w:Wikipedia:Reference desk archive/Language/July 2006
 * —Nils von Barth (nbarth) (talk) 20:12, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

title: Talk:forewarn


text: hanging participles

title: hanging participles


text:
User talk:DKrivan

Ultimateria 20:30, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

title: User talk:DKrivan


text:
User:Mashaunix

Contact me on Czech Wiktionary.

title: User:Mashaunix


text:
contabil

Etymology
, ..

Adjective

 * 1) accountable requiring accountability

Noun

 * 1)  accountant, bookkeeper

title: contabil


text: täyttävää

title: täyttävää


text:
caer bien

Etymology
Compare 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1)  to please, be nice, make a good impression a person
 * 2)  to promote or make for good or proper digestion food
 * 3)  to make happy, make laugh, satisfy, please news, advice, announcement
 * 1)  to promote or make for good or proper digestion food
 * 2)  to make happy, make laugh, satisfy, please news, advice, announcement
 * 1)  to promote or make for good or proper digestion food
 * 2)  to make happy, make laugh, satisfy, please news, advice, announcement
 * 1)  to make happy, make laugh, satisfy, please news, advice, announcement
 * 1)  to make happy, make laugh, satisfy, please news, advice, announcement
 * 1)  to make happy, make laugh, satisfy, please news, advice, announcement

Usage notes
and can be used to show whether a person likes or dislikes another person. In this sense, is used like, but in a friendship way, with the person being liked as the subject of the sentence instead of the object. Therefore, the verb is conjugated to reflect the subject.
 * ("Tu amiga" is the subject, so the verb is conjugated in the third person and not the first person.)
 * ("Tus amigas" is the subject, so the verb must be plural.)
 * The prepositional phrase is used because it is not possible to write . Whenever a person's name is used instead of a personal pronoun, the person's name must be preceded by the preposition . A redundant pronoun such as  is also needed. This sentence can also be written as
 * ("Tus amigas" is the subject, so the verb must be plural.)
 * The prepositional phrase is used because it is not possible to write . Whenever a person's name is used instead of a personal pronoun, the person's name must be preceded by the preposition . A redundant pronoun such as  is also needed. This sentence can also be written as
 * The prepositional phrase is used because it is not possible to write . Whenever a person's name is used instead of a personal pronoun, the person's name must be preceded by the preposition . A redundant pronoun such as  is also needed. This sentence can also be written as

title: caer bien


text: entwickelest

title: entwickelest


text: entwickelnd

title: entwickelnd


text: entwickele

title: entwickele


text: entwickeltest

title: entwickeltest


text: entwickel

title: entwickel


text: entwickeltet

title: entwickeltet


text: entwickle

title: entwickle


text: entwickelet

title: entwickelet


text: entwickelte

title: entwickelte


text:
entwickelt

Adjective

 * 1) developed

title: entwickelt


text: entwicklest

title: entwicklest


text: entwicklet

title: entwicklet


text: entwickelst

title: entwickelst


text: entwickelten

title: entwickelten


text:
täyttävä

Adjective

 * 1) filling filling the stomach

title: täyttävä


text:
Appendix:Snowclones/have X, will travel

Etymology
Early 1900s. Popularized by a 1950s radio and TV show, in which the main character, Paladin, carried a business card with the phrase "HAVE GUN WILL TRAVEL".

Phrase

 * Have Gavel, Will Travel (From a trading card from Disney's Toontown Online featuring the Big Wig)
 * Have Gavel, Will Travel (From a trading card from Disney's Toontown Online featuring the Big Wig)

Statistics

 * Frequency: Very frequent (upward of 10 million Google results)
 * Most common uses: First two pages of Google results show for X: cake, baby, spacesuit, laptop, fork, guitar, phaser, saddle, sword, children, justice, trunk, and kids.

title: Appendix:Snowclones/have X, will travel


text:
Talk:tail-toddle

RFV discussion
Not seeing it used. Note incidentally that the source listed s.v. References seems to be saying the word is Scots rather than English. —msh210℠ 18:19, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

I tried to change it into Scots, because it's not English but Scots only, but Mglovesfun took it to the ancient version. What can I do? --Rabbie Barns 15:21, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
 * As mentioned on your talkpage, you (RB) should add a new section for the Scots word rather than replace the English section with a Scots one. However in this particular case, I think we can simply replace it and mark this RFV as failed re English, since it's clear that the original editor created it in error as English. I've done that now: replaced the en section with a sco one, and kept the rfv tag re the sco entry. —msh210℠ 16:08, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Incidentally, is that a common Scottish (or other) English use of ancient to mean previous, no longer in place? I've never heard it, and we don't have it s.v. ancient. —msh210℠ 16:10, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

RFV failed, entry deleted. I couldn't find any evidence that this is ever a verb; even the reference only gives it as a noun. (But I couldn't find any noun citations, either.) —Ruakh TALK 15:37, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

title: Talk:tail-toddle


text:
Talk:strict justice

RFV discussion
"The act of imposing unreasonably harsh penalties for minor or trivial offenses." SoP? Not in Wikipedia. Equinox ◑ 18:26, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

 * RFV failed, entry deleted. It does seem plausible that this is in use in this sense — +  — but I didn't see any clear-cut examples. By contrast, I did find clear-cut, or relatively clear-cut, examples of a different sense,  + . Several of these examples oppose it to  (despite Micah 6:8 — I guess these writers, if they're aware of that verse, must find it contradictory), but even so it is not quite synonymous with the sense the entry had; and both senses seem to be SOP. (But, more importantly for our purposes, no one has proposed to cite the one sense, and no one has proposed even to add the other.) —Ruakh TALK 02:16, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

title: Talk:strict justice


text:
Talk:pornoless

RFV discussion
Looks much rarer than pornless:. Good luck! Equinox ◑ 22:14, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Citable at Google groups, FWIW. I'll let someone else practice. DCDuring TALK 22:26, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Is it? Only one of the hits appears to be from Usenet (i.e. "durably archived"). Equinox ◑ 22:29, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

RFV failed, entry deleted. As Equinox says, Google Groups only turns up one Usenet hit for the term; Google Books turns up a hit, but I can't see it, and from the search-page snippet it doesn't seem to be a proper use, anyway; Google Scholar and Google News Archive both turn up diddly. —Ruakh TALK 23:56, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

title: Talk:pornoless


text:
Talk:stratic

RFV discussion
Rfv-sense (noun): "strategic change". Not seeing anything. and use stratics in a sense we don't have and may need. —msh210℠ 18:57, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * OK - Google books shows this to have a geological meaning as an adjective. Added the best I can do. SemperBlotto 07:31, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Speedily deleted several months ago by SemperBlotto/msh210. —Ruakh TALK 04:29, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

title: Talk:stratic


text:
Talk:digital print matrix

RFV discussion
I don't think that the two usages of this that I could find correspond to the definition or, indeed, to any single definition. DCDuring TALK 18:36, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
 * "The digital state from which a print art image is instanced (output) with original intent." I'll be damned if I know what this means. Is intent a mistake for content? Mglovesfun (talk) 11:54, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

RFV failed, entry deleted. —Ruakh TALK 07:40, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

title: Talk:digital print matrix


text:
Talk:woontytump

RFV discussion
Molehill. Nothing in Books. Equinox ◑ 12:48, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Creative invention or joke. Deleted SemperBlotto 21:21, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

I don't think so. want: is a dialectal word for mole, and tump: is a mound or molehill, so it sounds plausible to me –– bit of a weird spelling, mind. I see hits for want-tump: and wonty-tump:. < class="latinx">Ƿidsiþ 22:35, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

title: Talk:woontytump


text:
Appendix:Snowclones/X is the new Y

Etymology
Its first form, "X is the Y of Z", was said by as "pink is the navy blue of India" in the early 1960s. This phrase was originally used with colors, and the "X is the new Y" form appeared in the 1980s with many colors being referred to as "the new black".

Phrase

 * pink is the new black, fake is the new real, night is the new day
 * pink is the new black, fake is the new real, night is the new day

title: Appendix:Snowclones/X is the new Y


text:
caer mal

Verb

 * 1)  to be disagreeable, make a bad (or not so good) impression a person
 * 2)  to make for or cause a bad digestion food
 * 3)  to make unhappy or sad, to anger, to dissatisfy news, advice, announcement
 * 1)  to make for or cause a bad digestion food
 * 2)  to make unhappy or sad, to anger, to dissatisfy news, advice, announcement
 * 1)  to make for or cause a bad digestion food
 * 2)  to make unhappy or sad, to anger, to dissatisfy news, advice, announcement
 * 1)  to make unhappy or sad, to anger, to dissatisfy news, advice, announcement
 * 1)  to make unhappy or sad, to anger, to dissatisfy news, advice, announcement
 * 1)  to make unhappy or sad, to anger, to dissatisfy news, advice, announcement

Usage notes

 * See.

title: caer mal


text: valssia

title: valssia


text:
mataburros

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1)  dictionary
 * 2)  grille guard, bumper guard car accessory
 * 3)  cattle grid
 * 1)  cattle grid

title: mataburros


text:
مەكتەپ

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) school

title: مەكتەپ


text:
grille guard

Noun

 * 1) A metal frame attached to the bumper of a vehicle in order to protect the grille.

Translations

 * French:
 * Spanish: mataburros

title: grille guard


text:
otrlý

Adjective

 * 1) callous emotionally hardened

title: otrlý


text: Uiquipedia

title: Uiquipedia


text:
Viquipèdia

Proper noun

 * 1) Wikipedia

title: Viquipèdia


text: Wikcionariu

title: Wikcionariu


text:
indigó

Etymology
Borrowed from, from , from , from.

Noun

 * 1) anil, indigo (plant)
 * 2) indigo (colour)
 * 3) carbon paper

title: indigó


text: indigók

title: indigók


text:
User:Daniel Carrero/Gadget-HotCat.js

/* Script: User:TheDJ/Gadget-HotCat.js * HotCat: Adds an easy way to add, modify and remove categories * Documentation: User:TheDJ/HotCat * Originally written by: Magnus Manske *  * This version was forked from http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=MediaWiki:Gadget-HotCat.js&oldid=10204404 * In sync with version: http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=MediaWiki:Gadget-HotCat.js&oldid=19600669 * Major changes: *  - all code for the uploadForm has been removed *  - autocommit is disabled *  - will be enabled on pages without categories so that you can easily add them *  - uses javascript:void as a dummy value for href in order to avoid a conflict with popups. *  - checks for  and removes it if a category is added *  - does not use JSconfig for configuration options like its Commons original *  - tries to detect other categories and if possible, add to the end of them. *  - fixes a bug in the suggestion list with titles containing : character *  - Uses opensearch API to look for categories. Allows for case insensitive search. *  - Postfix blacklisting in addition to prefix blacklisting. * User:TheDJ 2009-04-18 */

title: User:Daniel Carrero/Gadget-HotCat.js


text:
factureren

Etymology
Borrowed from and.

Verb

 * 1)  to invoice

title: factureren


text:
Talk:qyamancha

RFV discussion and follow-ups
Alt spelling of kamancheh:. Not in Books/Groups. Equinox ◑ 15:49, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

 * It's very, very rare. There does seem to be a painting called "Armenian still-life with qyamancha and flowers" which could debatably be called 'durably archived', but we'd still be two short. Mglovesfun (talk) 09:53, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

 * These sites use this spelling:, (durably archived in the name of Meruzhan Khachatryan's oil-on-canvass drawing "Anna with qyamancha"),  (durably archived in the name of Vigen Hakobyan's album "Qyamancha"), ,  (durably archived in the name of Meruzhan Khachatryan's 2009 oil-on-canvass painting "Armenian still-life with qyamancha and flowers"), ,  (durably archived in the name of Suren Khorenyan's oil-on-canvass painting "Qyamancha"), &c. It's attestable, but its definition should be changed to be a  . For some reason, all the users of this spelling seem to be Armenian or Georgian, even though it's a Persian instrument whose name is Persian; perhaps that should be reflected in an additional context tag.  — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 19:54, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

 * There are two letters for k in Armenian: one is = [k], the other is  = [kʰ]. When transliterating informally, like the painters and musicians in your links did, we often use Latin k for the first, and q for the second, as if q were somewhat more aspirated. Qyamancha then is a rendering of Armenian.
 * PS. The instrument is not just Persian: it's also Armenian, Georgian, Greek, etc. You must have seen Kamancheh, but there is also Kemenche. Same instruments really, but separated there because of political POV-pushing. --Vahagn Petrosyan 21:02, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

 * How very interesting. Could you explain all that in an etymology section in undefined: please?  — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 21:12, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

 * Ah, I see you already have. Is this change OK?  — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 21:15, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

 * Sure, I added the rest of my lecture there. Jesus, we are one badass dictionary: where else can you find such stuff? --Vahagn Petrosyan 21:23, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

 * It's why I edit here.  — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 21:38, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

RFV failed, entry moved redirectlessly to Citations:qyamancha. —Ruakh TALK 07:34, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Why does fail RFV? Paintings, alba, and drawings on sale are surely durably archived... — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 20:47, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

 * They are? —Ruakh 21:00, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

 * Well, they're not websites that'll one day be deleted, or SMS text messages, or e-mail messages, or conversations — they're solid works of art (however defined), which one can buy. How else would you determine that something is "durably archived"? — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 21:04, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

 * But they can burn in a devastating fire, therefore they are not durably archived. b.g.c and groups.google.com cannot burn in a devastating fire. That's the only reason I can think of to not accept them... -- Prince Kassad 21:09, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

 * Well, who's archiving them? The painters are trying to sell them, but will they succeed? And even if they do — will the English names, in these spellings, be on the paintings in some way? (I also have other concerns besides durable archival — two of the cites are mutually non-independent, and the other two don't use the term in any sort of context that would clarify language, POS, etc. — but I really think the durable archival concerns are enough.) —Ruakh 21:13, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

 * Books, too, can burn or, less drammatically, fail to sell. How would we go about disproving that the paintings are called what those sites claim they're called? As for your other concerns, I should think that lots of context would be unnecessary simply to prove the existence of a certain spelling, and that something like an index listing would do just fine. — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 21:18, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

 * If I write a novel out in longhand, titled Floobety, and try to sell the manuscript on a web-site, that does not suddenly count as a durably archived use of . When we say that books are durably archived, we don't literally mean that anything that could plausibly be referred to as a "book" is durably archived; rather, we mean that citations from books are generally citations from durably archived books — books that are found in libraries, printed in reasonable numbers, and so on. —Ruakh 01:42, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

 * What about citations of monumental inscriptions, or of lone manuscripts, as are frequently used for ancient languages? Their originals are particularly susceptible to the ravages of time. Am I right in concluding that your reasoning implies that, though those four original sources are not deemed durably archived, a receipt of purchase for one of them would be? We can't disallow all paintings, since there are some quite famous ones which use words in a lot of context, such as Dalí's Dream Caused by the Flight of a Bee around a Pomegranate a Second Before Awakening. — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 09:04, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

 * I really don't think any of our ancient-language citers is using "lone manuscripts" in any relevant sense, simply because I really don't think any of our ancient-language citers has access to any "lone manuscripts" that have not been reproduced elsewhere! (I often produce cites from the Westminster Leningrad Codex, but I can assure you, I'm not keeping it in my climate-controlled manuscript cellar. And not just because I live in a "flat".) As for your Dalí painting, see . The title of that painting it durably archived in at least a few dozen books. —Ruakh 12:50, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

 * Could you offer a quantitative definition of "durably archived", then? It concerns me that ambiguity is being introduced into the fourth attestation criterion, which has hitherto been one of the few solidly unambiguous guidelines we have. — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 21:58, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

 * I'm sorry, to me it just seems obvious that the title of a random painting being sold online is not "durably archived" in the way that a published book is. I don't know how to quantify that. But maybe it's just me; perhaps a BP discussion is in order? —Ruakh 00:04, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

 * Yeah, maybe, since the contrary seems obvious to me. I'll wait for Vahagn Petrosyan to comment herein, if he wants. — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 12:23, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Vahagn found this. Does it sway you at all? — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 22:39, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

 * Not really, since it's only a mention. I didn't move the entry because I don't want it, I moved the entry because it failed RFV. Sometimes I try to be a bit lenient in closing RFVs, when there's decent evidence for a word, but it belongs to a language or dialect that's sorely underrepresented in print; but that doesn't seem to be the case here. Indeed, quite the reverse: as an alternative spelling of an attested word, I would expect it to be overrepresented in print (since it's 100% unrepresented in speech). —Ruakh 20:10, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Hi Vahagn. failed RFV. Do you know of any sources you can cite to attest that spelling? Also, you may want to contribute at User talk:Ruakh. — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 21:58, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

 * Hi. I was able to find only this book. The rest are paintings, albums, forum posts, websites. These show that the spelling exists and that people use it, it's not made up. The only reason why Ruakh would interpret CFI rules so pedantically here is because he tries to get back at me for mocking his people. --Vahag 14:24, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

 * I'd rather address is arguments than question his motives (which, besides personal inclination, is what WT:AGF requires that we do). I've brought the book citation to his attention; I'll let you know if it sways him. — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 22:45, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Comment: other forms cited
I couldn't find any uses of this spelling, but I have just cited kyamancha and kamancha. - -sche (discuss) 04:18, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Deletion debate

 * Note: all referenced discussions have been archived to Talk:qyamancha. See there for background. —Ruakh TALK 23:12, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

I marked this RFV failed and pseudo-deleted accordingly (by moving it sans redirect to Citations:qyamancha, and formatting it as a citations page), and no one objected in the RFV discussion itself, but left a comment at my talk-page disagreeing, and I now see that he left a comment at 's talk-page as well, and to judge by Vahagn's reply, Vahagn also disagrees with the pseudo-deletion.

I think I acted correctly — the citations given don't seem to be "durably archived" to me, and I couldn't find any durably archived cites myself. (The only Google Books hit is a mention with attribution to Wikipedia; Google Groups turns up no Usenet hits; and Google Scholar and Google News Archive both turn up blanks.) However, Doremítzwr believes that the citations are durably archived, so I'd like input from third parties, if possible.

(This may actually be better as a BP discussion, or as a new RFV discussion, but since (1) we're only discussing one entry at the moment and (2) the previous RFV discussion failed to garner comments, I thought I'd bring it here first.)

—Ruakh TALK 23:12, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Perhaps the problem is how can a one word title convey meaning? If there was a very famous painting called Wiktionary, what definition would that justify for the word? Mglovesfun (talk) 23:12, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

 * Well, I'm not sure about the album, but the paintings do depict the instrument. (If you follow the links in Citations:qyamancha, you can see pictures of them.) That's not perfect — for example, none of the titles use an article, even though I'm almost positive that in a sentence one would say "a qyamancha" rather than simply "qyamancha" — but it's not the worst thing ever. —Ruakh TALK 02:08, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

 * Delete. I am not perfectly sure, but the reasoning that you have shown in RFV (see Talk:qyamancha) seems valid to me, so this word should be deleted as having failed RFV. --Dan Polansky 09:25, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

closed, there doesn't seem to be any kind of consensus for restoring the entry -- Liliana • 04:00, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:qyamancha


text: lap belts

title: lap belts


text: brallor

title: brallor


text:
অকারণ

Etymology
. Structurally, from 🇰🇲 which is equivalent to prefixation of.

Adjective

 * 1) unnecessary
 * 2) causeless, unprovoked

Adverb

 * 1) without cause
 * 2) unnecessarily, needlessly

title: অকারণ


text: damnaj

title: damnaj


text: damnan

title: damnan


text: damnajn

title: damnajn


text: voĉsintezilon

title: voĉsintezilon


text: voĉsinteziloj

title: voĉsinteziloj


text: voĉsintezilojn

title: voĉsintezilojn


text:
User talk:TeleComNasSprVen

/archives

Vietnamese entries with classifiers
Please see Requests for deletion and Requests for moves, mergers and splits. Do you have any problem with the precedent that these deletions would set? – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 10:36, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the heads up. I'll try to draw up a response at the first link: Requests for deletion TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 21:29, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Re: Yellow background
Do you use the MonoBook skin? The Vietnamese wikis customize that skin to show File:Headbgyellow.jpg in the background of non-article namespaces. (The English Wikipedia used to use a periwinkle content background in those cases.) Originally, the Standard (Classic) skin used to turn golden for non-article namespaces, presumably so it would be harder to pass off (say) a user page as an article. In Vector, the Vietnamese wikis still change all the light blue elements to light green. – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 23:23, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, I use Monobook and thanks for the clarification. I was a bit confused at first why some pages were yellow and some retained the 'whiteness' that the Monobook skin has on other wikis. That makes sense, although it could be made more apparent. (Or maybe it is explained somewhere and I just haven't looked closely enough into viwiki's documentation). TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 01:15, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

 * It used to be a software feature, so I guess we never thought to document it anywhere. I mentioned it at w:vi:Wikipedia:Bài bách khoa là gì?, which is quite obscure, but we always assumed that people would notice the connection between the color change and the namespace in the title. I'm currently toying with other background changes, like diagonal stripes on sandbox pages and "PREVIEW" wordmarks when previewing changes. – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 13:57, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Copyright
Re: "I always thought copyrighting a dictionary is pretty silly given that definitions of words contain no original thought."

Be advised that definitions are copyrighted, whether you find it silly or not. "Original thought" is not a prerequisite for copyright; it is the "original expression" in a very weak sense of "original" that is a prerequisite. Actually, original thought itself is not protected, since it is the expression that is protected, not the thought. --Dan Polansky (talk) 07:48, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, my original statement was a rationale for the above. There are more considerations on this at the Wikipedia page on the 'threshold of originality', which I'll quote here:
 * "The threshold of originality is a concept in Anglo-American-based copyright law systems that is used to assess whether a particular work can be copyrighted. It is used to distinguish works that are sufficiently original to warrant copyright protection from those that are not. In this context, 'originality' refers to 'coming from someone as the originator/author' (insofar as it somehow reflects the author's personality), rather than 'never having occurred or existed before' (which would amount to the protection of something new, as in patent protection)."
 * As I understand it, because most definitions are common knowledge (read: facts) rather than expressions of thought, it is easy to take a number of non-original pages from a dictionary without having to comply with copyright. It is only when it reaches an arbitrary threshold, say of about a hundred or so pages, that it is necessary to comply with copyright or claim fair use. And even then, I do not believe we have any power, legal or otherwise, to stop people from simply not giving attribution to us, out of sheer laziness or otherwise: they could just claim they got it from their personal dictionary.
 * I've just been thinking harder lately about why we bother with the CC-BY-SA attribution at all. Perhaps the other Wiktionary users will think differently. Perhaps you may think differently about how copyright works on this site. I'm just exploring its ramifications here. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 08:04, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Definitions are not common knowledge; meanings are. Definitions are specific phrasings, and these are not common knowledge. If you randomly ask people to give you definitions for various words, they will either give you no definition at all or they will give you one that differs from what you find in dictionaries, unless they actually check a dictionary. If you check OneLook dictionaries, you will find that different dictionary makers try to come up with slight variations in the definition phrasing.
 * Whatever you think, I ask you to refrain from copying English definitions from other copyrighted dictionaries (as contrasted to public domain ones, such as Webster 1913); I do not claim you have already added anything.
 * I do not know what you mean by "non-original pages from a dictionary". --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:12, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
 * "Non-original pages from a dictionary" refers to the copyright context of "originality" in the quote above. It does not make sense for people to violate copyright when they quote dictionaries in everyday speech and forgetting to give proper attribution, in response to questions posed by others like "What does X mean?" Well, it is one thing to question copyright rules and another to comply with them. I can choose to disagree with copyrights, and still comply with them, just as I do the rest of the policies on this site if I have found a policy I disagree with. But I guess the ontological questions of thoughts, expressions, meanings and copyrights could be outside the scope of this dictionary.
 * Re: "Definitions are not common knowledge", then they are not expressions of fact? Expressions of meaning? Opinions are original thought, and copyrightable; the fact that the sky is blue is not, and a picture snapshot of the sky in its entire blueness is not copyrightable. To the extent definitions are also expressions of an author's opinion on what the meaning ought to be, then they are copyrightable. But most definitions are true to the fact they represent, which is common knowledge. Copyright on words is a maze of legal territory to get lost in.
 * Re: "refrain from copying English definitions" All the entries I have so far published are my own, and they are also everyone's knowledge, as I've indicated in the template. I've not gone even as far as to quote the great Webster 1913. Non-originality is saying fuego means fire, and that "fire burns". It is the presentation of that fact, how we think it should be, using the various templates and headers and metadata that we use, that is copyrightable. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 08:30, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

CFI and idiomaticity
"CFI:idiomaticity" does not refer to "conveying meaning"; we have WT:CFI for that as a separate section in CFI, and "conveying meaning" is part of "attested", not "CFI:idiomatic". "CFI:idiomatic" is not the same as "idiomatic"; CFI:idiomatic is the same as "not sum of parts"; CFI:idiomatic is defined at WT:CFI. --Dan Polansky (talk) 20:57, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Then explain the quotes I brought up and the arguments presented therein. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 21:03, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Wikitiki got it wrong in the quotes: SOP is the same as not CFI:idiomatic. There is nothing to explain other than human error.
 * Let us see what WT:CFI says:
 * "... of including a term if it is attested and idiomatic."
 * “Attested” means verified through [...] use in permanently recorded media, conveying meaning, in at least three independent instances spanning at least a year (different requirements apply for certain languages).
 * An expression is “idiomatic” if its full meaning cannot be easily derived from the meaning of its separate components.
 * --Dan Polansky (talk) 21:06, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * All you have done is refer back to CFI like a legal document; you've not provided any constructive argument for a possible vote that I called for to set up which would solve most of this. You're still making it about keeping or deleting the entry instead of responding to my question appropriately. Anyway, this is better discussed at the RFD which will gain better input. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 21:09, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Okay, since that is what you proclaim to be 'human error', I suggest you leave that comment about that in the thread on WT:RFD rather than here. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 21:11, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Well yes, this is how RFD works, referring to what CFI sets up as criteria for inclusion. Most of the time, we actually do abide by CFI, and do check whether the nominated terms meet WT:CFI or not. Some RFD discussions may use non-CFI arguments (including mine), but that should be made explicit. --Dan Polansky (talk) 21:14, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I do not disagree that CFI is a good document to abide by; however, it's not the end-all and be-all argument-stopping cut-short-all-thought binding document that you seem to make it out to be. Sometimes the exception proves the rule, not just its adherents. RFD is one of many venues by which we can do a reassessment of CFI and how it applies to our treatment of words.
 * You've still not provided a solid argument in the RFD discussion to indicate whether or not you support what I've said. References to CFI do not adequately address the point I made earlier in the RFD discussion about how best to think about and treat repetitively occurring entries, which are not necessarily sums of parts. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 21:47, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * In WT:RFD, I made my argument entirely within CFI. There, in 'Okay, does anyone think that our entries for "ha" units beyond a certain number, say three or four, convey any idiomaticity to them, ...', you spoke of "idiomaticity", which in RFD normally refers to WT:CFI. So I think it relevant to point out that "hahahahahahahahaha" is CFI:idiomatic. --Dan Polansky (talk) 22:05, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I believe I spoke about 'general' "idiomaticity", referred to by WikiTiki, not CFI idiomaticity. I've said it there and I've said it here, it does not have to pertain to the particular entry in question. It's about other things in general, like "great-great-" etc, and I think you've missed that part. And anyway, this discussion should be moved back to RFD. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 22:09, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Since CFI defines the term "idiomaticity" and since failure of idiomaticity is the main reason for terms being nominated at RFD, as opposed to RFV, there is no way an experienced Wiktionarian can think that "idiomaticity" in RFD refers to general idiomaticity as opposed to WT:CFI. --Dan Polansky (talk) 22:13, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I deliberately chose to talk to you here rather than at RFD, since the explanations I am making are very basic, trivial for editors experienced with RFD and CFI. --Dan Polansky (talk) 22:15, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, but I understand it well enough, having been here for some time now, and I've even cited WT:COALMINE as a reason to keep a few entries. The nomination I made may have been in error, but it's an opportunity for us to explore this issue beyond what CFI just tells us. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 22:19, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * When, in RFD, you use the word "idiomaticity" with the intent not to refer to CFI, that suggests you do not understand RFD and CFI well enough. When you further claim that "idiomaticity" refers to "coveying meaning", that suggests very poor knowledge of CFI. --Dan Polansky (talk) 22:22, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Of course, I would much rather have other things to do than dealing with RFD nominations created by people who contribute close to nothing of value to Wiktionary. --Dan Polansky (talk) 22:23, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * What is your purpose here then? Using RFD to examine CFI's merits, whether to apply it or ignore it, or god forbid actually change it, seems fine with me. There's nothing wrong with using RFD as a means to take a closer look at it.
 * Re: "Of course, I would much rather have other things to do than dealing with RFD nominations created by people who contribute close to nothing of value to Wiktionary." That is your opinion and your choice, I have respected that. If you insinuate I have not contributed constructively to Wiktionary, that is close to a personal attack and I would ask you to voice that opinion on the RFD discussion rather than here on my talkpage, where I am free to remove to remove at my discretion. I believe that I've contributed my fair share of English entries as well as Vietnamese translations, which you can check if you'd like. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 22:32, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Edit counters show you have contributed very little, yet you are busy clarifying CFI by making RFD nominations. I for one find that annoying. When that is combined with poor understanding of CFI and faulty arguing about "idiomatic" with no "I stand corrected", the annoyance is amplified. Your user name tops it all. --Dan Polansky (talk) 22:36, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Why don't you just choose not to participate in the discussion? I'm certain any unproblematic entries meeting CFI would be voted to be kept by other participants. I still don't see how RFD can break Wiktionary in any way. It's the same deal given to you when you nominated apple at RFV.
 * Edit counters are not everything. They only show the quantity of my work, not its quality, which I find severely lacking on this dictionary. But perhaps it is the nature of a wiki where everyone can edit that quantity naturally supersedes quality. It also neglects to show deleted edits, most of which I have made RC patrolling. Perhaps I'm wasting my time increasing it bit by bit responding to you now?
 * Unfortunately I chose this name at a time when most usernames had been taken by SUL, and for fear of breaking any backlinks to my name I'd rather keep this than have a rename or edit under a different name. Most other people do not bother to complain about it. Do you use your real name and prefer others do the same? For me, it is no. And besides, the username or how you address me is irrelevant so long as the message is communicated. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 22:54, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Consider things like great-great-great-grandfather at the RFD discussion nominated by Connel MacKenzie and the recent RFD/RFV nominations by WikiTiki, though they seem idiomatic to you. The arguments presented at those discussions initially did not cite CFI, but pointed to problems with how we handle words using CFI. Would you consider them annoying as well? TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 23:03, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Well, now that we have a vote up and running to change CFI, which is what I had planned for when I wrote what I did at RFD, the point is now moot. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 04:43, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Pointless rfe and rfp
In, you added etymology and pronunciation section. This you should not do, IMHO, since both etymology are pronunciation of "cod liver oil" are sum-of-parts and obvious. And even if the etymology were worth having, then you should be adding it rather than placing rfe around, since the etymology must be clear to you. --Dan Polansky (talk) 07:42, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Why? This is to clearly distinguish it from a sense that is overtly "sum of parts": cod + liver + oil. You've basically supported its deletion at RFD... you know you can do so by actually participating in RFD, right? TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 07:52, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

 * Ditto: . --Dan Polansky (talk) 10:40, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
 * You can replace the rfp with an IPA markup template as appropriate. You'll have to explain that more, as I do not see anything wrong with that edit. WT:ELE states "Ideally, every entry should have a pronunciation section, and perhaps a sound sample to accompany it. However, pronunciations vary widely between dialects, and non-linguists often have trouble writing down pronunciations properly." The course of action would be, if one does not know IPA markup, for fear of misusing a wrong character in the markup, they should ask someone who is intimate enough with IPA to be able to do the job. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 10:46, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The pronunciation of black hole is the pronunciation of black followed by the pronunciation of hole, right? Similarly for white dwarf, right? So placing conspicuous RFP, which cries "something's wrong", on an entry that does not really need pronunciation (thick skin) is borderline vandalism, right? --Dan Polansky (talk) 10:57, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I do not believe it is vandalism. I think that all entries should have a pronunciation section regardless, because the pronunciations of some entries may still behave differently together than they do apart. "white train" for instance is pronounced differently from "white" + "train". In fact most of the Vietnamese compound syllables here that are composed of more than two syllables also have different pronunciation sections even though they are pronounced the same apart, thanks to Wyang's new tool which provides IPA for compounds only, like khách sạn even though khách and sạn can have two separate pronunciation sections and keys. Anyway, I will ask you again to stop posting on my talkpage about pointless matters like issues of copyright, and to let me get back to building the dictionary. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 20:26, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
 * It's not vandalism, but it's not harmless, either. We only have pronunciation sections for a fraction of our entries, so prioritizing their addition is important. What you're doing is cluttering the request category with entries that might be deleted, which would be a waste of time for those adding the pronunciations. If it were only your own time wasted- no problem. Wasting the time of the few people who know how to do proper IPA pronunciations- not a good idea. Please note that I'm not endorsing Dan's ways of interacting with others (I personally find them annoying), just asking you to consider this on the merits, and not by who brought it up. Chuck Entz (talk) 21:06, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Oh I see, so you're saying I should not be adding pronunciation sections to entries that might be deleted under RFD/RFV? Would it still be appropriate to add the sections to already existing entries then, which have not been tagged as such? And like I said to Dan, I try my best to consider the central points of his arguments rather than its unfriendly tone, so your input is much appreciated.
 * I'm tempted to consider his posts as borderline harassment by now, Chuck Entz. To be sure, the blocking policy would be quite clear on this: "Causing our editors distress by directly insulting them or by being continually impolite towards them." TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 21:13, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Creating pronunciation sections is ok, but I would advise against request templates such as rfe and rfp, since you would be asking someone else to spend their time on it. It's just a matter of consideration for those who would be wading through the requests. It's a judgement call, so I'm not saying "don't ever do that", but I would never do that, myself. As for Dan's behavior, it wouldn't be the first time he's been blocked for harassing others, though the block I'm aware of had some irregular aspects to it that kind of blunted the moral authority of the block. We're not all that clear or consistent when it comes to whether to block long-time, productive contributors. Chuck Entz (talk) 22:57, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
 * black hole could be stressed in two ways, so pronunciation isn't completely obvious. 23:01, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
 * black hole can't be stressed in two ways. There is only one way to stress an adjective followed by a noun. --WikiTiki89 00:07, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
 * But just by looking at the term "black hole" as written, you don't see that the first word is an adjective. It could be another noun, which would turn it into a compound, and compounds are stressed differently from noun-adjective phrases. And there's nothing in the black hole entry that unambiguously confirms either possibility. 00:45, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I guess that's why they're usually written as one word in other Germanic languages. But anyway, that information can be obtained by looking up the constituent words. --WikiTiki89 00:47, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
 * If I look up black, I find both an adjective and a noun, so that doesn't really tell me anything. 00:49, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Then we are missing usage information at [[black]] and we are missing a sufficiently thorough etymology at [[black hole]]. --WikiTiki89 00:57, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
 * All of that, just to avoid putting a pronunciation in? 01:09, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I never said that shouldn't put the pronunciation in. But the IPA transcription shouldn't be the only way to figure this stuff out. --WikiTiki89 01:22, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

alt forms
I'm not sure whether e.g. off with her head, off with his head are alternative forms of off with one's head. They are more specific forms, limiting by gender. Perhaps redirects would make more sense, if these entries are useful at all? Equinox ◑ 04:25, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Perhaps, but I find there's no hard and fast rule for determining the relationship between inflected forms of "one" in entries. I've made many of my such entries to reflect some of the other practices I found on other parts of Wiktionary - they're not necessarily part of any policy so you're free to change as you see them fit into Wiktionary. I will just follow a different practice for my entries, however, until I find a rule that says that I cannot. I'm not sure what other Wiktionarians have to say on this, but I assume they follow their own particular idiosyncracies with the creation of their entries. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 04:28, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Distinguishing Hán-Việt vs. Nôm and Hán-Việt vs. thuần Việt
A lot of the Vietnamese entries have conflated Hán-Việt readings with thuần Việt meanings. For example, nghệ was given as a noun meaning "profession, trade". But you could never say "cái nghệ" to mean "a profession". Rather, nghệ is a reading of 藝, and definitions like "profession" should go there. The existing Vietnamese Hán character entries also fail to distinguish between Hán-Việt and Nôm readings. To make matters worse, some well-meaning editors went through and added, setting  to Nôm readings or   to Hán-Việt readings.

I've been correcting incorrect entries by hand based on the Vietnamese Wiktionary. (The Vietnamese Wiktionary only did a partial import of WinVNKey's Nôm dictionary: existing quốc ngữ entries got corresponding Hán-Việt and Nôm tables, and existing CJK entries got Hán-Việt and Nôm readings, but plenty of characters got left out.) Unfortunately, at this rate, it's going to take a long time to clean up the mess. Any ideas on how we could automatically detect and flag problematic entries?

– Minh Nguyễn 💬 10:00, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

title: User talk:TeleComNasSprVen


text:
ĝirafo

Etymology
Borrowed from, from , ultimately from. Compare 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) giraffe

title: ĝirafo


text: ĝirafon

title: ĝirafon


text: ĝirafojn

title: ĝirafojn


text: ĝirafoj

title: ĝirafoj


text:
ĝirafa

Adjective

 * 1) giraffine

title: ĝirafa


text: ĝirafaj

title: ĝirafaj


text: ĝirafan

title: ĝirafan


text: ĝirafajn

title: ĝirafajn


text:
User talk:Sylviecarter

Protologisms
Hello. You may use WT:LOP to see and add protologisms. At the top of the page, there is a list of letters beginning with "English : A – B – C – D". These letters are links to various lists of protologisms in English. The respective lists may be edited through various "[edit]" buttons.

Please do not create new pages to ask questions about Wiktionary. For that purpose, you may use this link.

Also, do not type your e-mail where anyone can see it. If you provided your e-mail through the Special:Preferences of Wiktionary, then you activated the link Special:EmailUser/Sylviecarter, which in turn may be used by anyone to send e-mails to you. --Daniel. 00:08, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

I am a first time user so learning the protocol as you have directed. Wiki needs to accommodate not just wizards at using your site but also people like myself who struggle at times to know where and how to navigate to get to a simply entry or contribution page on our user sites. I'm still unsure how to enter a newly termed word and I'm still unsure how I need to go about asking for help if I cannot find that link you sent me.

 * The addition of "mindscious" seems perfect on that list. You apparently copied the basic format (beginning with asterisk, sorting into alphabetical order, etc.) from other listed protologisms, thus resulting in a consistent overall format.
 * Please note that the link I sent to you was of the Information desk, a considerably long page where various people ask for questions about Wiktionary. Your question is the most recent, so it is in the bottom. In the future, other people may answer you on that very page, below your original message.
 * To differentiate your messages from messages of other people, I recommend typing four tildes (that is: ~ ) at the end of all your messages. The four tildes will automatically transform into your signature accompanied by date and time, like you can see in the end of my comments. It is not necessary to use the four tildes in the list of protologisms; only use them in discussion pages like here and in the Information desk. --Daniel. 01:11, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

Cool and thank you Daniel, I'm relieved and also keen to learn when I can move my coined word into the wiki dictionary proper....when it is published in my book or when? What is the criteria for birthing a new word? Please advise and or point me to the reference on this?Sylviecarter 06:00, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

 * I noticed that, in the end of your message above, there are four grave accents (that is: ````).
 * If, by chance, you have followed my recommendation to provide a signature, please remember that the right way to to it is by typing tildes (that is, once more: ~ ), not grave accents.
 * As for your particular question "when it is published in my book or when?", I could not understand exactly what you mean. If you are asking about a Wiktionary in printed form, I believe one does not exist officially yet. If you want to see your contributions and show to other people how you edited Wiktionary, use Special:Contributions/Sylviecarter. Otherwise, please reword your question, so I'll hopefully be able to answer it properly.
 * Notably, there is a policy on how to create protologisms, so I'll link it here: WT:PL.
 * --Daniel. 00:22, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

title: User talk:Sylviecarter


text:
Afghanistanism

Noun

 * 1) The practice of concentrating on problems in distant parts of the world while ignoring controversial local issues.
 * 2) Hopelessly arcane and irrelevant scholarship.
 * 3) Fascination with exotic, faraway lands.

title: Afghanistanism


text:
Timiskaming

Etymology
From the Temiscaming people's spoken language. Alternate spellings from the 1700s: Temiscaming, Timiscaming, Temiscamin, Temescaming.

Noun

 * 1) A tribe of North American Indians.
 * The Temiscaming live between Lake Temiscaming and Lake Abitibi in Northeastern Ontario.

Proper noun

 * 1) The lake near which the Timiskaming First Nation lives.

Etymology
The name of the reserve is derived from that of a nearby lake, derived in turn from an source.

title: Timiskaming


text:
campamocha

Noun

 * 1)  green praying mantis

title: campamocha