text:
User talk:Robert.Baruch

Welcome!

Hello, welcome to Wiktionary, and thank you for your contribution so far. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

 * How to edit a page is a concise list of technical guidelines to the wiki format we use here: how to, for example, make text boldfaced or create hyperlinks. Feel free to practice in the sandbox. If you would like a slower introduction we have a short tutorial.
 * Entry layout explained (ELE) is a detailed policy documenting how Wiktionary pages should be formatted. All entries should conform to this standard, the easiest way to do this is to copy exactly an existing page for a similar word.
 * Our Criteria for inclusion (CFI) define exactly which words Wiktionary is interested in including. There is also a list of things that Wiktionary is not for a higher level overview.
 * The FAQ aims to answer most of your remaining questions, and there are several help pages that you can browse for more information.
 * We have discussion rooms in which you can ask any question about Wiktionary or its entries, a glossary of our technical jargon, and some hints for dealing with the more common communication issues.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wiktionarian! If you have any questions, bring them to the Information desk, or ask me on my talk page. If you do so, please sign your posts with four tildes: ~ which automatically produces your username and the current date and time.

Again, welcome! --EncycloPetey 03:14, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Latin grammar question
Hi there. You are soliciting Latin questions, so here goes.

I often come across verb forms such as consequare: that appear to be an alternative form of e.g. consequaris: (2nd person singular present subjunctive). But no Latin grammar that I have access to mentions them. Do you think that it is OK to add such words that I come across in this manner? Is it always the case that such an alternative form exists? (If so, I can add it to the conjugation table, and get the bot to add such entries automagically). Cheers. SemperBlotto 15:41, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

 * I've been taught the phrase "r, ris/re, tur, mur, mini, ntur" for the passives. The alternate form for consequaris: would be consequare:. Moreland and Fleischer (Latin: An Intensive Course) lists -re as an alternate for -ris.

 * What you've got hold of here is consequi:, whose 2nd person singular present is consequeris:/consequere:, which changes the e to an a for the subjunctive, thus consequaris:/consequare:.

 * Long story short: yes, I believe the conjugation table ought to be changed to include the -ris/-re alternats for all passive forms (not only the subjunctive!).

 * Hope that helps! --Robert.Baruch 16:28, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

Latin Quotations
Thank you for working on this long-neglected document! You should probably mention Category:Latin quotation templates, where there are ready-made templates for the source line of several commonly quoted sources, like Caesar, Ovid, and the Vulgate. This can save time determining dates and locating links. --EncycloPetey 17:39, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh, good point. Thanks! --Robert.Baruch 17:40, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I'll echo that; thank you! Mglovesfun (talk) 18:00, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
 * You're both very welcome, and thank you for the encouragement! --Robert.Baruch 15:46, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you for creating this section. Just some queries: is there any chance we can standardise the formatting for quotations for precisely. For example, a while ago I made this edit ; so I would like to see a rule added about no wikilinks to words in the quotation or translation (although I notice now that WT:Quote has an ongoing discussion about this with no concensus, adding to the fact that it's just a guideline). Also I'd like to see a decision made on whether to italicise the translation or not. How about online links to translations? How should they be incorporated? I was not actually aware about changing the orthography back to what is the current standard; although, in that case, why do we even have entries like jubeo? Caladon 18:17, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I agree, no wikilinks. I wouldn't even put any clarifying links in there. It looks to me like there's weak consensus for this in the discussion, but that's only my interpretation.

 * At one point, maybe a year ago or more, I was absolutely positive that there was a rule somewhere about italicizing translations. But I certainly can't find it, so I don't italicize. There doesn't seem to be anything about it in Quotations, so I'd say that's the rule: no italicizing quotations or translations, unless the italics were in the original.

 * Online links to translations. Hmm. There should be a way to work a footnote in somehow.

 * We do have a rule at About_Latin saying that words with j should be considered alternative spellings of the word with i, as long as the word with j is attested. So as an entry, jubeo would make sense with respect to that rule, but not in a quotation, unless the quotation is there to support the lemma. On the other hand, I don't like to see j anywhere, for the same reason I don't like to see u where v is meant. Otherwise I'd have to double up on every entry with an i in it. Kepler has jamjam, and I'm not gonna be the one to make that an entry. I know it's a weak argument, but I think anyone reading Latin should know that j = i and that u and v are different (post-Classically, anyway). --Robert.Baruch 18:48, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

Latin translation
As a learning tool, I am translating the Lord of the Rings into Latin. However, I am very inexperienced with the language. I was wondering- would you be willing to check over the little I've translated so far? I am concerned with my word usage, as well as the grammar. Here is the first sentence, to give you an example-

 * English- This book is largely concerned with Hobbits, and from its pages a reader may discover much of their character and a little of their history.

 * Latin- Hic liber Hobbites pertinens maxime, et ex paginis lector characteris multus eorum et historiae aliquod eorum cognoscat.

If you would be willing to help, I would be very grateful. | Scio (talk) 23:45, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Yes, I'd be willing to help! I'm not a great Latinist, but two are better than one. In general, remember that no two Latinists are ever gonna translate the same thing in the same way, so you're always going to get disagreements on word usage and order. Also, don't try word-for-word in-order translations. Get the general sense first, don't be afraid to use a different word if the Latin term is less ambiguous, then add emphasis where you think it should go.

Be sure you have:

 * Traupman's Latin/English/Latin dictionary ISBN 055359012X.
 * Bradley's Arnold (the Bolchazy edition, ISBN 0865165955, is very nicely formatted). The best high-level prose composition book I've ever found.
 * Lewis and Short via Perseus and English L&S search. Searches through L&S with English words as well, even though L&S is a Latin-to-English dictionary.
 * Whitaker's Words.
 * Neutral word ordering of sentences. Stick with the neutral order, and then change it from there to add emphasis.

With that out of the way, I'd make just a few changes to the first translation:

 * is concerned with -> pertinet (sense II.B) + ad.
 * largely -> plerumque. Maxime is closer to exceedingly, especially, most particularly.
 * character -> natura.
 * from its pages -> ablative of means (by means of its pages) -> paginis (no ex).
 * Even better, let's try a qui-phrase, by means of whose pages, so we can get rid of the et: paginis cuius lector...
 * much of -> accusative -> multum.
 * a little -> paulum, makes a nicer contrast to multum than aliqui does.
 * You can probably remove the first eorum, since there is already a second eorum which can apply to both natura and historia.
 * Finally, try to get away from et. Caesar didn't use a lot of them. Just use a comma, and use qui-phrases wherever possible.

So we end up with: Hic liber ad Hobbites plerumque pertinet, paginis cuius lector naturae multum, historiae paulum eorum cognoscat.

Let's try the next sentence! --Robert.Baruch (talk) 17:51, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Huzzah! I have tried to contact numerous other users, but they either are much to busy (such as admin) or are inactive.

Thanks for the help. Here is the next sentence (this will really be bad, especially the word order)-

 * English- Further information will also be found in the selection from the Red Book of Westmarch that has already been published, under the title of The Hobbit.

 * Latin- Litteram multus in electione ab Libro Rubro Occasitinere cognoscat, qui iam proditus cum titulum Hobbit.

Correction-

 * Plus informatio in electione ab Libro Rubro Occasitinere cognoscat, qui iam proditus cum titulum Hobbit.

However, I don't know if the 'ab' before an ablative 'Libro' is needed. | Scio (talk) 20:23, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

About ab and ablatives:
 * Use a before consonants, ab before vowels, abs before h.
 * With ablatives, always go through the list to figure out which fits best. Which ablatives to use ab with? Always with place from where (motion), personal agent, sometimes with separation (no motion), never with means. So:
 * I flew from New York.
 * A Novo Eboraco volavi. (place from where)
 * I was given the ticket by David.
 * Tessera a Davo data sum. (personal agent)
 * Now I'm away from my friends.
 * Iam ab amicis meis absum. (separation)
 * However, I am not free from that city's nature.
 * Natura autem illius urbis non libero. (separation, libero is a special case)
 * I flew from New York by airplane.
 * A Novo Eboraco aeroplano volavi. (means)

(will add more later) --Robert.Baruch (talk) 00:13, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for the help, especially the wikipedia article; I will study it thoroughly. | Scio (talk) 00:20, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Another general principle I use is to get rid of words or simplify them first.

 * More information -> plus. The word information is kind of a generic word, like thing, stuff, event, so it can be left out. Note that it's also accusative (cognoscat = One may know...) and plus is the accusative of plus :/
 * selection -> pars.
 * in the selection -> in illa parte = in that part (which has already been published). Demonstrative. Otherwise it's a kind of weak "a selection". However, since we used cognoscat, this becomes ablative of means (one may know more by means of...), so just illa parte.
 * from the Red Book -> which ablative? None of them! It's actually revealed to be a partitive genitive now that we've simplified selection to part. So Libri Rubri. We could also just use ex + abl ("out of"), but we've got "part" so we may as well use it.
 * Westmarch -> Neat translation, but more properly occidens + iter, not occasus, because occasus is setting, and west is specifically solis occasus (the setting of the sun). Occiditer, Occiditineris. Adjective form Occiditinicus/-a/-um, or Occiditinense. So since we have of Westmarch, we can use Occiditinensis.
 * under the title of X -> sub titulo X, where X is in the ablative because it's in apposition to the title, i.e. "under the title, X".
 * The Hobbit -> Ille Hobbit. Ille also means "that famous", also see Winnie Ille Pu.

So we have, I think: Plus illa parte Libri Rubri Occiditinensis cognoscat, qui iam proditus sub titulo "Illo Hobbite". --Robert.Baruch (talk) 01:02, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

 * Robert, Timotheus1 seems somewhat interested in this 'project' (I wouldn't have called it a project before, but now I suppose it will take a little more work than a simple hobby); would you mind if he could join in with some input? Instead of taking so much space on your page, I think it would be better to continue this on mine, regardless if Timotheus1 joins or not. (He rates himself as la-3, by the way; you should see his talk page)

 * Gratias tibi ago for the help; It is much appreciated. | Scio (talk) 03:09, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

 * I will not be able to read your response until about eleven hours from now, as I have to sign off; I am sorry. Everybody being on different time zones makes it difficult to get things done efficiently. But for now- good bye. | Scio (talk) 03:38, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

One error I made is qui should be quae, since it refers to pars. And there's a missing est in the relative phrase, and I'd put the relative phrase closer to its antecedent:

Plus illa parte Libri Rubri Occiditinensis, quae iam prodita est sub titulo "Illo Hobbite", cognoscat. --Robert.Baruch (talk) 16:29, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Did you see my post?

If you would rather keep Timotheus1 out of this, it is ruder to ignore him, rather than state your thoughts. If you don't want him to join, just say so! I appreciate your help, but I think multiple latinists working on this is better than one (for truly you are doing most of the work, not me). | Scio (talk) 17:31, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

 * I don't want you to say okay if you feel it would be better to keep the translating between the two of us. I would only like an answer. Personally, I think you would be a better teacher than Timotheus, and, as I am doing this to learn, I would like this to be between us. I think that Timotheus is probably doing this because it is interesting, but I am not sure if he would be as good at teaching as you, although he seems about as good as latin as you are. However, remember that I would very much like you to decide on your own, guided by what you think best.

 * Gratias tibi ago. Please forgive me for the bitterness of the previous post; you may not have meant to look like you were ignoring my question. In that case I was in the wrong; however, I will not edit it, as I believe I must take responsibility for my actions, and that I should not hide past actions. | Scio (talk) 01:58, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

 * I will give you the next sentence at around 15:00 UTC, if I have it translated by then. Thank you very much; you are a great help with learning Latin. I am also translating Commentarii de Bello Gallico; would it be feasable for you to check that, as well? It is a different skill to translate into one's own language, as opposed to translating one's own into another, less familiar tongue. It would be greatly appreciated. | Scio (talk) 03:25, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

 * I don't really mind either way, with or without Timotheus. But my instinct is that this is better one-on-one, otherwise we could just end up getting side-tracked by endless talmudic debates of which is the better word, order, whatever. Nothing against anyone. Granted, Timotheus's Latin is much better than mine. Perhaps we could keep the discussion here, or on your page, and if there's something we just can't figure out, consult Timotheus? What do you think? --50.76.40.134 17:39, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

 * As for the Commentarii, sure, I've translated the first part myself, so at least I can help there, until we get into the part I haven't worked with, and then it would be slower progress :) --50.76.40.134 17:40, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

 * Yes, I think it would be good to keep this between us and consult Timotheus when needed. I also think it would be better to move this to my page, if you don't mind.

 * Also, could you explain to me what the infinitive verb forms are used for? I don't think I fully understand.

 * I'll make a subpage for this, since it's generally useful! --Robert.Baruch (talk) 18:56, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

 * Finally, your signature is an IP... I wouldn't know if you forgot to sign in, or are just an anon posing as the real Robert... | Scio (talk) 18:27, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

 * Forgot to sign in :/ --Robert.Baruch (talk) 18:56, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Here is the next sentence (it is the last of the first paragraph, and is very long)-

 * English- That story was derived from the earlier chapters of the Red Book, composed by Bilbo himself, the first Hobbit to become famous in the world at large, and called by him There and Back Again, since they told of his journey into the East and his return: an adventure which later involved all of the Hobbits in the great events of that Age tht are here related.

 * Latin- Illa narratio ab capitulam anteriora Libri Rubri concepit, Bilbe ipso scriptus sunt, Foramecator primum in mundum cebrem factus est, scribit,  qui a Bilbe Hic et huc Iterum appelatur, quia de itere orienti reversionemque eius dixerunt: quod postmodo omnes Foramecatores in magnam res illius aetatis, quae huc memorantur, amplexus est.

I couldn't find a translation for adventure, but I think I have kept the original meaning. Gratias tibi ago. | Scio (talk) 15:03, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

It could be a good idea to make subpages on your page for the translation work. Feel free to copy-paste the current discussion there.

For this first part, let's focus on "composed by Bilbo himself" because there are a lot of good lessons to be drawn here.

 * One good rule to keep in mind is that if a verb is passive, and you're translating "by /person X/" then the translation will be "a /persona X/", always. This is just a longer way of saying "ablative of personal agent is always with ab". And remember the a/ab/abs rule.

 * So if we had "The book was composed by Bilbo", we have a passive verb, and Bilbo is the personal agent, so we should translate it as: Liber a Bilbe scriptus est.

 * Remember also that the verb must agree with its subject (liber) in gender and number, so it's scriptus est.

 * Next, if you've got a relative clause -- that is, an entire sub-sentence that describes a word in the main sentence -- then use qui. So for "...the Red Book, composed by Bilbo...", mentally insert the missing relative: "...the Red Book, which was composed by Bilbo..." and so we would have: ...Liber Ruber, qui a Bilbe scriptus est...

 * And finally, "himself". You have ipse, which is very good. But I'd put it in front of the noun, as demonstrative adjectives, like numbers, typically go in front: ...qui ab ipso Bilbe...

For the next part, let's look at "That story was derived from the earlier chapters of the Red Book".

 * I always check with L&S to make sure the word I'm using has the sense I need. So concipio works pretty well, because of sense II. D. But see that our use is passive: "was derived". Concepit would mean that the subject (That story) derived an object (which we don't have). Early on I also had some difficulty distinguishing passive from past.

 * So clearly "That story was derived..." is: Illa narratio concepta est... Now, what about "from the earlier chapters"? Check the list of ablative phrases. It doesn't fit any of them. The closest could be ablative of separation, but it seems kinda weak. So instead we could use de (down from) or ex (out of). Ex is pretty close. Let's just use that: ex capitulis anterioribus.

 * "of the Red Book", which as we know is just a partitive genitive, so Libri Rubri as you have.

Putting it all together: "Illa narratio ex capitulis anterioribus Libri Rubri, qui ab ipso Bilbe scriptus est, concepta est."

I'll cover the rest of the sentence later. --Robert.Baruch (talk) 18:47, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Here is the new subpage, where my answer will be. I originally was teaching myself Latin (usually I do better like that), but I guess for languages it is better if somebody else teaches me. Thank you. | Scio (talk) 19:23, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Are you still there? By the way, I am now IACOBVS.CELSVS, not Scio.... If you look at our project at la.wikisource, you will see that I have translated quite a few sentences. | IACOBVS.CELSVS (talk) 22:34, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Wowzers, that's a lot of work. I'll have to check my subscription settings to see why I wasn't notified of your changes. --Robert.Baruch (talk) 01:34, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Salve!
Merry Christmas! I haven't updated the Dominus Anulorum page in a while, but I did add a new sentence after our last translating session. I understand if you can't work this season; December and early January are the busiest parts of the year. If you could let me know when you would be able to continue our normal correspondence, that would be nice.

Once again, Merry Christmas! | IACOBVS.CELSVS (talk) 05:00, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

 * Happy Christmas!

 * You might be interested in some exercises in composition I'm cooking up. --Robert.Baruch (talk) 06:37, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Thank you! I will be translating those... or, at least, trying to... | IACOBVS.CELSVS (talk) 17:14, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

 * Hello, again. Can you check your "paginae custoditae" settings for the Dominus Anulorum discussion pages? I updated the page for sentence 1.3.6.

 * By the way, I like how you did that last sentence (telling me how it works, and then letting me figure it out from there). I think it is easier to learn that way, instead of me doing some of the work and you fixing my mistakes.

 * Finally, about Traupman's: you will find what I have to say on the Sententia 1.3.6 page. Gratias tibi ago. | IACOBVS.CELSVS (talk) 14:57, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks -- I found that I didn't have those page on my watchlist. I'll make sure to check that! --Robert.Baruch (talk) 20:19, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Robert. I am sorry that we have not corresponded for quite some time. I have been extraordinarily busy of late, and will be for quite some time. The job I am going into will require much time, and I will have, at most, two weeks of the year on leave. Once again, I am sorry that I could not tell you sooner.

I will, however, be available (perhaps) most of this week, with the exception of tomorrow. My schedule has recently been quite unpredictable. I hope you will understand.

Now, regarding languages, I have been studying Latin on my own during the little free time I have. I have become quite familiar with the grammar, which will help me to learn other languages. Since I am familiar with a Germanic language and a Romance language, I have decided to complete the main trio of Europe with a Slavonic language. After doing some research, I settled on Polish. You will remember, I hope, that I only studied Latin to familiarise myself with foreign language. I did not intend on becoming fluent.

I suppose I should also say that I met a few fellow students of Latin a couple months ago who each had at least three years of experience with the language. We all could easily converse in Latin without a dictionary, myself included, though I had (at that time) only about five or six months of experience. I believe I have you to thank for this acomplishment.

I have but the following question: could you recommend anyone who speaks Polish, and is a good teacher? I am teaching myself at the moment; however, it is, as you know, a lot different being taught by someone who is alive than someone who has been dead for a number of years, or by a dictionary which can't give you pointers like a person can. Any pointing would be much appreciated.

Overall, thank you for the time you have spent teaching me Latin. Again, I apologise for the lapse in communication. I hope to see your reply soon. | IACOBVS.CELSVS (talk) 00:08, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

 * Hey there. Good to hear from you! I've also been busy with other pursuits. Sadly, I have no knowledge of anyone fluent in Polish. Good luck! --Robert.Baruch (talk) 00:35, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Thank you! I will be looking around for someone who can help me with the language. I don't know when I will be able to talk again, but until then, have a good one! | IACOBVS.CELSVS (talk) 15:16, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi
Nice to see you're back. I've been sitting on some ideas for working on post-Classical Latin in case you feel like getting into some serious editing. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 04:13, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

 * Salve! Sadly I haven't been keeping up with my Latin, and I find it as difficult as ever to translate. I'm a terrible Latinist and need more practice. I decided to maybe add some quotations for more modern terms, hoping that this would get me back in the mood. Of course, the first sentence I came across and tried to translate into English just wouldn't parse for me. But the search is at least satisfying. --Robert.Baruch (talk) 23:59, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

 * I'm not very disciplined myself, but luckily my grasp on Latin seems well ingrained. I cleaned up your translations a bit, and noticed that one of the quotes included the word, which we lacked, which then sent me down a little rabbit-hole of radio-related words we lack. There is just so little New Latin coverage here, and the only trouble is that one has to check to make sure that whatever word Vicipaedia uses is actually attested by the Vatican and whatnot. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 01:53, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

 * Recte dicis. I hadn't even thought of adding radiophonicus. --Robert.Baruch (talk) 04:07, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

 * What are your thoughts on changing the Latin translation of website from the individual words situs interretialis to the phrase? I have a nice quotation I can use from the Vatican in 2005. --Robert.Baruch (talk) 00:13, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I think it's justified to do that. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 01:25, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey

Hi ,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. [mailto:surveys@wikimedia.org Email us] if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 14:29, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey

Hi ,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. [mailto:surveys@wikimedia.org Email us] if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 19:11, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey

Hi ,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. [mailto:surveys@wikimedia.org Email us] if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 17:02, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

felano
Please don't recreate this page without citations that meet WT:CFI. It has already failed WT:RFV; see the discussion at Talk:felano. Ultimateria (talk) 20:47, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

title: User talk:Robert.Baruch


text: politiskt

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: politiskt


text:
экстремист

Noun

 * 1) extremist

title: экстремист


text:
экстремизм

Etymology
Borrowed from, from.

Noun

 * 1)  extremism

Noun

 * 1)  extremism

title: экстремизм


text: kulturellt

title: kulturellt


text: finansieras

title: finansieras


text:
förhållandevis

Adverb

 * 1) somewhat, relatively

title: förhållandevis


text:
pașcă

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) a kind of low-quality tobacco

title: pașcă


text:
intestinalis

Etymology
Renaissance Latin; from.

Adjective

 * 1) intestinal; pertaining to the intestine

title: intestinalis


text: nucifera

title: nucifera


text:
nucifer

Etymology
New Latin; from.

Adjective

 * 1) bearing, producing or containing nuts

Etymology
.

Adjective

 * 1) nuciferous

title: nucifer


text:
ao ước

Etymology
🇰🇲.

Verb

 * 1) to wish for; to crave for

title: ao ước


text:
luật

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) the law
 * 2) rules ; compare

title: luật


text:
obsoletus

Etymology
Perfect active participle of intransitive.

Adjective

 * 1) old, worn out, thrown off
 * 2) obsolete, out-of-date
 * 3) common, ordinary, mean, low

title: obsoletus


text:
gái

Verb

 * 1) say

Etymology
From ; compare.

Noun

 * 1)  whores; female prostitutes
 * 1)  whores; female prostitutes

Adjective

 * 1) wife of, Mrs (when used after a pronoun or noun denoting a male person)
 * 1) wife of, Mrs (when used after a pronoun or noun denoting a male person)
 * 1) wife of, Mrs (when used after a pronoun or noun denoting a male person)
 * 1) wife of, Mrs (when used after a pronoun or noun denoting a male person)
 * 1) wife of, Mrs (when used after a pronoun or noun denoting a male person)
 * 1) wife of, Mrs (when used after a pronoun or noun denoting a male person)
 * 1) wife of, Mrs (when used after a pronoun or noun denoting a male person)
 * 1) wife of, Mrs (when used after a pronoun or noun denoting a male person)
 * 1) wife of, Mrs (when used after a pronoun or noun denoting a male person)
 * 1) wife of, Mrs (when used after a pronoun or noun denoting a male person)

Usage notes

 * Gender-neutral terms like and  can be followed by  or gái to clarify the gender of the person referred to.

title: gái


text:
xinh

Etymology
.

Attested as a variant of (as in ) in Đại Nam Quấc âm tự vị (1895). The earlier meaning appears to be along the line of "neat (of appearance), graceful (of manner)", as in the (now obsolete?) compound (cf. ).

Adjective

 * 1) nice; pretty

title: xinh


text:
occludens

Etymology
Present active participle of.

Participle

 * 1) shutting up; closing up
 * 2) restraining, stopping

title: occludens


text:
ấy

Etymology
Diachronically, this is probably a Northern Vietnamese innovation occured some time between the stages of Proto-Vietnamese and attested Northern Old Vietnamese. It is amply attested in the oldest Nôm texts (which are all in Northern Old Vietnamese), yet has no cognate in the Muong lects, and usage of this morpheme by Central and Southern speakers clearly indicates borrowing. It also does not neatly fit into Proto-Vietnamese demonstrative paradigm with its zero-initial.

The situation can probably be hypothesized as:

Determiner

 * 1)  that; those

Particle

 * 1)  sentence-ending intensifying particle

Pronoun

 * 1)  you, my buddy/gal

title: ấy


text:
cảm tình

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) ; affection

title: cảm tình


text:
симулировать

Etymology
, from and, with the Russian suffix. Morphologically симул- +.

Verb

 * 1) to simulate
 * 2) to feign an illness or disability, especially in clinical or legal context; to malinger

Conjugation
imperfective: perfective:

title: симулировать


text:
giành

Etymology 1
.

Verb

 * 1) to dispute; to fight (for/over); to claim

Noun

 * 1) a kind of wooden, woven basket with a flat bottom

title: giành


text:
jammelai

Numeral

 * 1)  one

title: jammelai


text: Category:Ngarrindjeri numerals

title: Category:Ngarrindjeri numerals


text:
Talk:重感情

This one might be a sum of parts or maybe a phrase. 重 here is understood as 重视, 尊重, not "heavy". Similar constructions also exist for other qualities, eg. 重友谊, 重友情, 重亲情. It's just that this one is overwhelmingly common. Wjcd 04:48, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

title: Talk:重感情


text:
Talk:naaldlooshii

Always plural?
Is this word always plural, not singular? 71.66.97.228 04:53, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

 * It can refer to a single animal, but usually it is used collectively. —Stephen (Talk) 10:08, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Added to "Usage notes." 71.66.97.228 16:44, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

 * It is not necessary to add plural/singular info to Navajo nouns, virtually every noun can be plural or singular. In a few cases where there is a -da- or -daa- infix, it is plural only, but these are rare, and almost all nouns can be any number. Adding singular/plural usage is like putting a usage note in each English noun that sometimes it may be construed with "the", "a", or "an". The reason that this noun is usually plural has to do with the meaning, not with the word or with the language. Everywhere it is usual to speak of animals, beasts, and livestock in the plural or the collective sense. It is rare to see the need to speak of one head of livestock or one beast. The only reason we use the singular of animal as much as we do in English is because we have a special word for the singular and we like to use it for crude humans. —Stephen (Talk) 16:58, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

title: Talk:naaldlooshii


text:
User talk:Banedragon

quideray
The entry you created seems to have been a protologism and has been deleted. If you are sure that it is a real word, please provide evidence of this word being used in durably archived media (mainly printed books, and usenet groups) as required by our inclusion criteria. For a term to be included, it must be used by at least three different authors over more than a year, and the authors must be actually using the word, not just explaining its meaning or stating that it exists. If you can find any such quotations, please add them to the citations page. --EncycloPetey 05:08, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

title: User talk:Banedragon


text:
bộ chính trị

Etymology
🇰🇲.

Noun

 * 1) politburo

title: bộ chính trị


text:
chính trị

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1)  politics

Adjective

 * 1)  political

title: chính trị


text: Category:vi:Hearing

title: Category:vi:Hearing


text: Category:vi:Senses

title: Category:vi:Senses


text:
Talk:龌龊

Please fix
"Filthy" and "dirty" are not nouns. Please fix. 71.66.97.228 05:30, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

 * This kind of nominalisation without the use of particles is pervasive in analytic languages like Chinese and Vietnamese. Basically words can all act as nouns, verbs and adjectives if semantically allowed, and as a result the import of Chinese produced a disproportionate amount of nouns in agglutinative languages like Korean and Japanese. Wjcd 05:38, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

If so, the entry can add inflection lines giving the various parts of speech that the word can take on in different contexts. 71.66.97.228 06:03, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

title: Talk:龌龊


text:
Talk:柏木

Also cedar?
Can't this word also be used to mean "cedar"? 71.66.97.228 05:38, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

 * Yes. Added. ---> Tooironic 00:29, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

It looks like the Chinese name for cedar (genus) is 雪松 and the Chinese word for the cypress (family) is 柏科. 71.66.97.228 23:25, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

Additional definition
Can this also refer to the Platycladus orientalis (also known as Chinese Arborvitae or Biota)? 71.66.97.228 23:21, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:柏木


text:
Daygo

Proper noun

 * 1)  San Diego, city in the state of California, in the United States of America

title: Daygo


text:
Talk:宮保

Needs English definition
This needs an English definition. 71.66.97.228 05:47, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Added. Is this really an abbreviation for Kung Pao chicken? Can it also refer to "Kung Pao" (the person for whom the dish was named)? 71.66.97.228 22:18, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

 * I made some additional edits to clarify things. -- A-cai 01:00, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

You did a masterful job, worthy of bestowing the title of "Gong Bao of Wiktionary" on you. 71.66.97.228 01:08, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

title: Talk:宮保


text:
Talk:黃鍾

Please use English
Please use English for 十二律. 71.66.97.228 05:53, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

title: Talk:黃鍾


text:
Talk:竹升

Needs Cantonese
Needs Cantonese. 71.66.97.228 05:55, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Added. Needs expansion. 71.66.97.228 22:54, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

title: Talk:竹升


text:
Talk:驚輸

Hokkien?
If this is a Hokkien term why is there a Mandarin entry for it? 71.66.97.228 05:56, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

 * Because you created one by falsely assuming that Chinese languages all use different characters for the same concept. Wjcd 05:58, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

If there is a pinyin reading given, it needs a Mandarin heading at Wiktionary. Some terms in non-Mandarin Chinese languages/dialects don't exist in Mandarin, although they can be rendered in pinyin. 71.66.97.228 06:02, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

title: Talk:驚輸


text:
Talk:角宿

Please use English
Please use English instead of writing "星宿s." 71.66.97.228 05:57, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Untranslatability. Wjcd 05:59, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

title: Talk:角宿


text:
Uniunea Europeană

Proper noun

 * 1) European Union

title: Uniunea Europeană


text:
Category talk:Military

Category for "war"?
Is there a category where we could put terms related to war/wars? 71.66.97.228 06:09, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

title: Category talk:Military


text:
Talk:嘈嘈

Parts of speech
All the definitions are listed under "Noun," but "rackety" and "noisy" are adjectives and "noisily" and "vociferously" are adverbs. Please fix. 71.66.97.228 06:18, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

All the definitions are listed under "Noun," but "rackety" and "noisy" are adjectives and "noisily" and "vociferously" are adverbs. Please fix. 71.66.97.228 02:17, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Done. 98.123.38.211 00:48, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Needs Middle Chinese
Needs Middle Chinese readings. 98.123.38.211 00:48, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:嘈嘈


text:
User talk:69.249.83.31

Avada Kedavra
I have removed your addition "Only one has lived through this curse (Harry Potter) It is one of the 3 unforgivable curses. " from Avada Kedavra. That term is not one Unforgivable Curse; it is the incantation of an Unforgivable Curse, "Killing Curse", that is already linked from it. By the way, Fawkes survived this curse too. However, the information of who did and did not survive it does not seem worthy as dictionary material. --Daniel. 06:20, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

title: User talk:69.249.83.31


text:
Talk:浸水

Not a noun
"To immerse or dip in water" is a verb, not a noun. Please fix. 71.66.97.228 06:22, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. 71.66.97.228 03:18, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

title: Talk:浸水


text:
Talk:金剛

?
What does "retinue Hercules of Buddha, who carry 金刚杵" mean? 71.66.97.228 06:26, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
 * See Vajrasattva. I think the original editor was trying to explain that 金剛 refers to the Vajra, which is held by Vajrasattva, but phrased it really awkwardly.  -- A-cai 00:06, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Thank you; that is great information. I will fix it by simply adding the definition "vajra." 71.66.97.228 00:10, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

title: Talk:金剛


text: nenällä

title: nenällä


text: turvalla

title: turvalla


text: kuonolla

title: kuonolla


text: nokalla

title: nokalla


text: otsalla

title: otsalla


text: korvalla

title: korvalla


text: päälaella

title: päälaella


text: ohimolla

title: ohimolla


text: kaulalla

title: kaulalla


text: hartioilla

title: hartioilla


text: olalla

title: olalla


text: varpaalla

title: varpaalla


text: nilkalla

title: nilkalla


text: kyynärpäällä

title: kyynärpäällä


text: sydämellä

title: sydämellä


text: olkapäällä

title: olkapäällä


text: ranteella

title: ranteella


text:
Talk:雕刻

Parts of speech
"to carve, to sculpt, to engrave" are not nouns. Please fix. 71.66.97.228 06:48, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. 71.66.97.228 05:32, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

title: Talk:雕刻


text:
Talk:绘画

Parts of speech
"To paint, to draw" are not nouns. Please fix. 71.66.97.228 06:52, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

"To paint, to draw" are not nouns. Please fix. 71.66.97.228 02:29, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:绘画


text:
Talk:逼真

Fix parts of speech
Please fix parts of speech in definition line. 71.66.97.228 06:53, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Please fix parts of speech in definition line. 71.66.97.228 02:31, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

 * Done. ---> Tooironic (talk) 06:03, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:逼真


text:
Talk:不常

Please fix
Please fix parts of speech. These are not all nouns. 71.66.97.228 06:53, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Please fix parts of speech. These are not all nouns. 71.66.97.228 00:33, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

 * Why don't you be bold and do it yourself? It's a voluntary project. ---> Tooironic 00:30, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

We need a more expert editor to do it. Don't you recall that you warned me, in extremely strong terms, several times not to edit Mandarin entries anymore? 71.66.97.228 01:39, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

 * No I don't remember that, and I can't find such a warning on your talk page. All I'm saying is I've noticed you seem to post a lot on talk pages about very simple changes that could actually be made by yourself. Seriously, it's not rocket science, just look at similar entries which have been made before, hundreds of times, by myself and other editors. ---> Tooironic 00:31, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

 * How does it look now? I don't like the fact that it was transliterated from zdic.net, almost word by word. The English definitions were slightly off (not too far off), but there was no indication of whether a term is still used in modern Mandarin. Jamesjiao → T ◊ C 02:06, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for correcting the lack of attention of the entry creator (I believe User:Wjcd, who didn't feel getting the parts of speech accurate was important). 71.66.97.228 04:22, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:不常


text:
Talk:大纲

Parts of speech
These are not all nouns. Please fix. 71.66.97.228 07:00, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
 * This is just horrendous. If he does it again, I will block him indefinitely. Most of the definitions are archaic/obsolete, which he failed to tag. I will have to do some research into this term myself. Jamesjiao → T ◊ C 23:34, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Now that is some outrageous unjustified defamation. Please at least do some research before making such comments and potentially abusing your admin rights.
 * It had been fortunate that I listed the definitions according to modern usage frequency, not chronologically and etymologically (as in "汉语辞海" and "汉语大辞典"). I wrote the heading as "Chinese" and therefore tagging the definitions as obsolete was unnecessary, since many of these meanings still survive regionally and in compounds or idiomatic sayings. And then someone came along and insisted on ludicrously changing all the "Chinese" headings to the misnomerous "Mandarin", and failed to tag correspondingly. The language that you are regarding as "Mandarin" here is more properly called "Modern Standard Chinese" (现代标准汉语 as in zh.wp) and is the literary standard of all Chinese varieties (the Wikipedia page is about to be moved to "Modern Standard Chinese"). Trying to get the supposedly "Mandarin" definition of a word and making it stand out against a bunch of other mostly unstandardised, typically unwritten "languages" is simply ridiculous. I speak three vastly different Mandarin dialects, and what this page has had been trying to combine them into one, underrepresenting the non-Modern Standard Chinese Mandarin dialects by forcibly giving them the label of "Mandarin" without some sort of indication of standardness.

This is the 汉语大辞典 entry of this word:

 * 1) 網的總繩. (the main rope of a fishing net)
 * 三國·魏·曹植《白鶴賦》：“冀大綱之解結，得奮翅而遠遊. ”
 * ''Three Kingdoms, Wei, Cao Zhi, "White crane": Longing for the unbinding of the fishing net's main rope, through which it endeavours to spread its wings and fly faraway.
 * 1) 總綱；要點. (general principle, main point)
 * 《漢書‧敘傳下》：“略存大綱，以統舊文. ”
 * 宋·蘇洵《上韓樞密書》：“太尉取其大綱而無責其纖悉. ”
 * 清·李漁《閑情偶寄‧詞曲‧詞采》：“文章頭緒之最繁者，莫填詞若矣. 予請總其大綱，則不出情景二字. ”
 * 1) 特指著作、講稿、計劃等經系統排列的內容要點. (content outline of a work, plan, speech)
 * 郭沫若《洪波曲》第七章一：“決定工作方針，頒發每周宣傳大綱，而一切工作大抵是由三廳總其成. ”
 * 1) 主要的法紀. (main laws and disciplines)
 * 三國·魏·曹植《節游賦》：“愈志蕩以淫遊，非經國之大綱. ”
 * 元·劉壎《隱居通議‧經史二》：“看來武侯相業，大綱常嚴，蓋其學出於申韓，故其政刻深. ”
 * 1) 猶大概. (roughly, generally)
 * 《二程語錄》卷十一：“又問：‘或言人如壽得一百二十數，是否？’曰：‘固是，此亦是大綱數，不必如此. ’”亦作(also)“大剛”.
 * 元·關漢卿《裴度還帶》第二摺：“大剛來則是我時兮命矣. ”
 * 1) 亦作“大剛”. 猶言總之. (in all, in short)
 * 元·張鳴善《水仙子‧譏時》曲：“鋪眉苫眼早三公，裸袖揎拳享萬鍾，胡言亂語成時用，大綱來都是烘. ”
 * 元·湯式《一枝花‧檜軒為越中沙子正賦》曲：“能借取四時春造化，似生成一片翠屏帷，大剛是即景成規. ”
 * 1) 猶言特意，硬要. (insists on doing something)
 * 元·無名氏《翫江亭》第四摺：“這廝便指望，大綱要成雙，百般的不肯將咱放. ”

Wjcd 00:26, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Dear User:Wjcd, I am very glad you are contributing to Wiktionary again, as you are clearly very knowledgeable about the (Standard) Mandarin language as well as the Chinese language(s) in general. First of all, not all the definitions are nouns, and after a month (or has it been longer, now?), this should be fixed, as they are currently all listed as nouns, although some of them are not nouns. Next, "Chinese" is not a header used in entries at Wikipedia, since it's not a discrete language but a conglomeration of related languages/dialects. There was a great deal of discussion several years ago that led to the consensus that Chinese languages/dialects should have their own headers ("Mandarin," "Cantonese," "Min Nan," "Wu," etc.) In this case, "Mandarin" does mean standard Mandarin (putonghua), "Cantonese" means standard (Guangzhou) Cantonese, "Min Nan" means standard Taiwanese (Hokkien), and "Wu" means standard Shanghainese. I had opined at the time that these should all be grouped as sublevels of "Chinese" but was outvoted. At Wiktionary generally if a language/dialect has its own ISO code it can have its own header. If there are sub-sub-varieties of a language (such as, for example, the sub-dialects of Sicilian or the sub-dialects of Emiliano-Romagnolo (such as Piacentino and Bolognese, which are quite dissimilar despite being grouped by linguists as sub-dialects of the same "language"), variant usages can be listed in sub-sections of the main header. Although we have had no one add any, I suppose regional Mandarin (northern Chinese) usages such as Sichuan Mandarin, Yunnan Mandarin, Shaanbei Mandarin, etc. could be added in such a way under the "Mandarin" header if they have the proper subheadings; similarly, Chaozhou usages could be added under the "Min Nan" heading; although the Chaozhou language often differs significantly from Min Nan it is usually grouped by linguists as a sub-dialect of Min Nan.

Getting back to the "Mandarin" heading, I do believe we can include antiquated definitions or usages (as, in fact, some characters and terms are hardly, if ever used in the modern day), if those are properly preceded by something like "(obsolete)." I hope this background information helps, and look forward to any new entries you choose to create in the future (keeping in mind that making sure parts of speech are accurately assigned in all our entries is important). 71.66.97.228 06:58, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

 * Compare the Chinese situation with the Arabic one - Both are macrolanguages in ISO, both are written in a non-Latin script, and both have a modern literary standard (see w:Talk:Standard Mandarin). The function of Modern Standard Chinese (literally from 现代标准汉语) is strikingly similar (name included) to Modern Standard Arabic: both are compulsorily adopted when it turns to newspapers and other written documents. In comparison, MSC is much more widely promulgated than MSA. And yet, there is no such category as "Modern Standard Arabic nouns", an "Arabic" heading can be gladly accepted without objection, and there is no category for romanised Arabic words analogous to Category:Chinese romanizations. Clearly this is not a manifestation of the said "one ISO code (or language), one heading" policy. How this all works here is dictated by perceptions of these languages from a mostly non-native speaker Wiktionary community. Sadly the policies make it difficult (at least seemingly, in this editing community) to overturn the already-established consensus reached by a group of earlier self-identified knowers, and the power distribution also makes it difficult for dissenters to survive well, as illustrated in the foregoing comments. I am despondent already, especially after seeing that the Chinese language presence here is set to be riddled with Pinyin entries, added by a contributor who regards 鞋 as a non-word. Wjcd 11:55, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

I have already said that regional Mandarin usages (from colloquial northern Mandarin, Shaanbei Mandarin, Yunnan Mandarin, Sichuan Mandarin, etc.) can be added under the "Mandarin" heading, with the proper subheadings and proper identification of which subdialects the usage appears. In the case of Cantonese, Wu, Min Nan (Hokkien), etc., these are really not the same language as Standard Mandarin, and when written, due to differences in vocabulary, grammar, etc. can sometimes make little sense to a reader familiar only with Standard Mandarin. I am sure you already knew that, but I'll reiterate that this fact is one of the main reasons for the agreed-upon avoidance of a single "Chinese" header for Sinitic entries spelled in Han characters, despite the wish among some to promote the idea of a common "Han Chinese language" identity. We need to work diligently and conscientiously, within the agreed-upon parameters of our project, which have been arrived at for logical reasons such as the above. I'll also reiterate that the incorrect parts of speech in several of the entries do still need to be fixed. 71.66.97.228 18:43, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

 * You didn't really respond to my doubt above, on the unreasonably dissimilar treatments of Chinese and Arabic entries. Wjcd 06:54, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Although I know something about the Arabic alphabet, I don't know enough about Arabic language to be able to respond. What was your point again? Stephen G. Brown is the one who knows Arabic well. 71.66.97.228 03:32, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Regarding the character 鞋, are you saying that it is used, either in speech or print, as a word on its own? If so, do you have evidence of this? The editor relying on the "Wenlin Dictionary" is saying that it must be "bound" to one or more other characters in order to be used in Standard Mandarin. Because s/he was so emphatic about this, I accepted it, but my only question is, was this always the case? I believe that some of the multi-character Mandarin words may not have originally been used in Old or Middle Chinese, but instead arisen over the centuries to avoid confusion between the many syllables with the same pronunciation and tone. That would mean that some words formerly used as single syllables are now nearly always or always pronounced in combination with other characters (such as the addition of "-zi" to indicate that it is a noun), simply to avoid confusion. 71.66.97.228 18:47, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Firstly, in Classical Chinese and its modern Chinese descendants, virtually every character is a (free) morpheme. Apart from -然, -子, -们, 阿-, 老-, -化, -家, -者, -头, -仔, 可-, -儿 which are both bound and free morphemes, there are hardly any characters that can be classified as bound morphemes/affixes. The fact that in modern descendants some characters do not appear to stand alone, is in most cases by no means indicative of their bound-morphemeness. Disyllabification of monosyllabic morphemes arose primarily from the need to disambiguate amongst monosyllabic homonyms, and to a lesser extent, from the need for further and more meticulous meaning clarification. But with non-monosyllabic morpheme-containing compounds, disambiguation is not a concern.
 * Secondly, Pinyin is not what written Chinese is supposed to be like. Acceptance of mere transcriptions or transliterations entries is unwarranted. Wjcd 06:54, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

 * Firstly, let me apologize for my words. I might have been a little too harsh and please do not take this the hard way. I retract my statement about some of the defs being obsolete. I do not know all the regional dialects and am thus not qualified to make such a statement. Anyhow, there seem to be multiple issues being discussed on this talkpage. One of them being the addition of Pinyin. I do support your idea that Pinyin is simply a transcription scheme and should not stand on their own as dictionary entries. They are, however, a valid lookup mechanism and should be included solely for that purpose (as opposed to having their own definitions). Not long before this, we just passed a vote to ban the addition of all non-toned pinyin entries: here. If you take a look at my comments in there, I suggested taking this further by only allowing pinyin entries to reference their corresponding character entries instead of having their own definitions (lots of duplication efforts!). Jamesjiao → T ◊ C 04:05, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

We are not talking about non-toned pinyin entries, which User:Ddpy's blocked predecessors were doing. Please take a look at his/her contributions and you will see the non-standard creation of many new "derived terms" categories, new hyphenated pinyin entries that are being called prefixes, suffixes, and affixes when they are regular nouns or adjectives, and the addition of the notation "bound form" to characters that are likely not "bound form." We have been discussing all of these things in various places, on a vigorous basis, for the past couple of weeks (trying to keep up with the user's many non-standard additions), up to now without most knowledgeable Mandarin contributors taking much interest. 71.66.97.228 05:17, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Thank you; this is very, very helpful. What you say makes the huge number of new toned pinyin entries, categories, etc., which are being created at a very rapid rate by the new editor, even more disturbing, as no one knowledgeable about Chinese is stepping in to check this editor. 71.66.97.228 03:32, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
 * That user is definitely not new. If I were an administrator, I would have blocked him/her straight away, as (s)he is clearly a Doppelgänger of the previously-blocked 91.- やから, who had a limited and misguided knowledge of the Chinese language. Wjcd 01:27, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, I had assumed s/he was a native Mandarin speaker. There were several 91s, as well as a previous registered user who was blocked, who made a lot of non-toned pinyin entries, as well as a lot of hyphenated pinyin entries and categories. 71.66.97.228 01:31, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Finally, s/he has created an entry that seems perfectly fine, without hyphenated pinyin: diànshìtái. 71.66.97.228 03:54, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:大纲


text: tenderpreneurs

title: tenderpreneurs


text:
Talk:江北

Proper noun?
Shouldn't this be a proper noun? 71.66.97.228 07:07, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Shouldn't this be a proper noun? 71.66.97.228 09:05, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:江北


text:
Talk:花旗國

Proper noun?
Isn't this a proper noun? 71.66.97.228 07:11, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

 * Yes. —suzukaze (t・c) 04:31, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Vocabulary of the Canton Dialect, Volume 2 (1828)
https://books.google.com.hk/books?id=udJUAAAAcAAJ&hl=zh-TW&pg=PP232#v=onepage&q&f=false

花旗國 Flower flag nation; i.e. the American.

RcAlex36 (talk) 05:36, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

title: Talk:花旗國


text:
Talk:花旗

Proper noun?
Isn't this a proper noun? 71.66.97.228 07:11, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes. Fixed now. ---> Tooironic (talk) 23:08, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:花旗


text:
energie nucleară

Noun

 * 1) nuclear energy

title: energie nucleară


text:
forță nucleară

Noun

 * 1) nuclear force

title: forță nucleară


text: Enzyme

title: Enzyme


text:
areiopagi

Etymology
From, which in classical times functioned as the high Court of Appeal for criminal and civil cases in Athens.

Noun

 * 1) Areopagus the supreme judicial and legislative council of ancient Athens
 * 2)  Any court or body that has the ultimate power to solve an issue.

title: areiopagi


text: hereditates

title: hereditates


text: hereditatis

title: hereditatis


text: hereditatum

title: hereditatum


text: hereditati

title: hereditati


text: hereditatibus

title: hereditatibus


text: hereditatem

title: hereditatem


text: hereditate

title: hereditate


text:
Talk:borachio

Pronunciation
This is pronounced as /bo-rachˈ(i-)ō/ according to The Chambers Dictionary 11ed. --Vahag 08:17, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

 * Fixed. — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 20:32, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

 * Chambers, unusually, puts the apostrophe after the stressed syllable and not before it. So I'm fixing this accordingly. Equinox ◑ 04:16, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:borachio


text: hiatui

title: hiatui


text: hiatu

title: hiatu


text: hiatuum

title: hiatuum


text: hiatibus

title: hiatibus


text:
auxiliatrix

Noun

 * 1) helper, assistant, aide (female)

title: auxiliatrix


text: auxiliatrices

title: auxiliatrices


text: auxiliatricis

title: auxiliatricis


text: auxiliatricum

title: auxiliatricum


text: auxiliatrici

title: auxiliatrici


text: auxiliatricibus

title: auxiliatricibus


text: auxiliatricem

title: auxiliatricem


text: auxiliatrice

title: auxiliatrice


text:
yn-ymmydey

Adjective

 * 1) usable, utilizable, employable

title: yn-ymmydey


text: hostilitates

title: hostilitates


text: hostilitatis

title: hostilitatis


text: hostilitatum

title: hostilitatum


text: hostilitati

title: hostilitati


text: hostilitatibus

title: hostilitatibus


text: hostilitatem

title: hostilitatem


text: hostilitate

title: hostilitate


text: humilitates

title: humilitates


text: humilitatis

title: humilitatis


text: humilitatum

title: humilitatum


text: humilitati

title: humilitati


text: humilitatibus

title: humilitatibus


text: humilitatem

title: humilitatem


text: humilitate

title: humilitate


text:
User:Jnestorius/Ph to f

 * gryphon<--griffin(/griffon)
 * gulph-->gulf
 * phantasy-->fantasy
 * phrenetic-->frenetic
 * phrensy-->frenzy
 * sulphur-->sulfur

title: User:Jnestorius/Ph to f


text:
yn-ushtaghey

Adjective

 * 1) irrigable

title: yn-ushtaghey


text: horrifica

title: horrifica


text: horrificum

title: horrificum


text: horrifici

title: horrifici


text: horrificae

title: horrificae


text: horrificorum

title: horrificorum


text: horrificarum

title: horrificarum


text:
horrifico

Etymology 1
From or

Verb

 * 1) to ruffle, make rough
 * 2) to strike terror, appal

title: horrifico


text: horrificis

title: horrificis


text: horrificam

title: horrificam


text: horrificos

title: horrificos


text: horrificas

title: horrificas


text: horrifice

title: horrifice


text:
bägge

Etymology
From, from , originally the genitive form of , now a synonym. Cognate with 🇨🇬.

Pronoun

 * 1) both

title: bägge


text:
glaeba

Etymology
Probably derived somehow from the root  and thereby cognate with, , 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, and perhaps 🇨🇬. However, the precise derivations of this form and its cognates are all. More information at.

Noun

 * 1) clod (lump of earth)
 * 2) land, soil
 * 3) lump, mass of stuff
 * 1) lump, mass of stuff

Descendants

 * Italo-Romance:
 * Gallo-Italic:
 * Southern Gallo-Romance:
 * Ibero-Romance
 * Sardinian:
 * Vulgar Latin:
 * Forms influenced by Oscan *glīfa:
 * Borrowings:
 * Ibero-Romance
 * Sardinian:
 * Vulgar Latin:
 * Forms influenced by Oscan *glīfa:
 * Borrowings:
 * Ibero-Romance
 * Sardinian:
 * Vulgar Latin:
 * Forms influenced by Oscan *glīfa:
 * Borrowings:
 * Vulgar Latin:
 * Forms influenced by Oscan *glīfa:
 * Borrowings:
 * Vulgar Latin:
 * Forms influenced by Oscan *glīfa:
 * Borrowings:
 * Forms influenced by Oscan *glīfa:
 * Borrowings:
 * Borrowings:
 * Borrowings:
 * Borrowings:
 * Borrowings:
 * Borrowings:
 * Borrowings:

title: glaeba


text: glebae

title: glebae


text: glebarum

title: glebarum


text: glebis

title: glebis


text: glebam

title: glebam


text: glebas

title: glebas


text: glaebae

title: glaebae


text: glaebarum

title: glaebarum


text: glaebis

title: glaebis


text: glaebam

title: glaebam


text: glaebas

title: glaebas


text:
glorior

Etymology
.

Verb

 * 1) to boast or brag
 * 2) to glory

title: glorior


text: gloriaris

title: gloriaris


text: gloriatur

title: gloriatur


text: gloriamur

title: gloriamur


text: gloriamini

title: gloriamini


text: gloriantur

title: gloriantur


text: gloriabor

title: gloriabor


text: gloriaberis

title: gloriaberis


text: gloriabitur

title: gloriabitur


text: gloriabimur

title: gloriabimur


text: gloriabimini

title: gloriabimini


text: gloriabuntur

title: gloriabuntur


text: gloriabar

title: gloriabar


text: gloriabaris

title: gloriabaris


text: gloriabatur

title: gloriabatur


text: gloriabamur

title: gloriabamur


text: gloriabamini

title: gloriabamini


text: gloriabantur

title: gloriabantur


text: glorier

title: glorier


text: glorieris

title: glorieris


text: glorietur

title: glorietur


text: gloriemur

title: gloriemur


text: gloriemini

title: gloriemini


text: glorientur

title: glorientur


text: gloriarer

title: gloriarer


text: gloriareris

title: gloriareris


text: gloriaretur

title: gloriaretur


text: gloriaremur

title: gloriaremur


text: gloriaremini

title: gloriaremini


text: gloriarentur

title: gloriarentur


text: gloriator

title: gloriator


text: gloriantor

title: gloriantor


text: gloriari

title: gloriari


text:
Talk:same

Definitions
Definitions from PD sources for this challenging word "same":

 * Webster 1913:
 * 1. Not different or other; not another or others; identical; unchanged.
 * 2. Of like kind, species, sort, dimensions, or the like; not differing in character or in the quality or qualities compared; corresponding; not discordant; similar; like.
 * 3. Just mentioned, or just about to be mentioned.
 * Century 1911:
 * 1. Identical numerically; one in substance; not other; always preceded by the definite article or other definitive word (this or that). In this sense, same is predicable only of substances (things or persons), or of other kinds of objects which, having individuality, are for the purposes of speech analogous to individual things, especially places and times. It is a relative term, implying that what comes to mind in one connection and what comes to mind in another connection are one individual or set of individuals in existence.
 * 2. Of one nature or general character; of one kind, degree or amount: as, we see in men everywhere the same passions and the same vices; two flames that are the same in temperature; two bodies of the same dimensions; boxes that occupy the same space. Same, used in this way, expresses less a different meaning from def. 1, than a different (and often loose) mode of thinking; the thought is often that of equality rather than that of identity.
 * 3. Just mentioned, or just about to be mentioned or denoted: often used for the sake of emphasis or to indicate contempt or vexation.

References:

--Dan Polansky 10:16, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

same
Rfd-redundant: The sense "Used to express the unity of an object or person which has various different descriptions or qualities" seems redundant to "Not different or other; not another or others; not different as regards self; selfsame; numerically identical". The latter (#1 in the entry) has recently been created by me out of the sense "identical", based on the preexisting example sentences.

The senses with example sentences, for immediate context:

 * 1) Not different or other; not another or others; not different as regards self; selfsame; numerically identical.
 * Are you the same person who phoned me yesterday?
 * I realised I was the same age as my grandfather had been when he joined the air force.
 * Even if the twins are identical, they are still not the same person, unlike Mark Twain and Samuel Clemens.
 * Peter and Anna went to the same high school: the high school to which Peter went is the high school to which Anna went.
 * 1) Similar, alike.
 * You have the same hair I do!
 * 1)  Used to express the unity of an object or person which has various different descriptions or qualities.
 * Round here it can be cloudy and sunny even in the same day.
 * We were all going in the same direction.

The sense #1 is formulated basically on the model of Webster 1913.

My estimate of redundancy is based not only on the wording of definitions but also on the example sentences. --Dan Polansky 13:55, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

 * Sense 2 ("same hair") is redundant. The difference between 1 and 3 seems to be whether the word is applied to two things or only one (rainy and sunny in the same day — the same as what?). Equinox ◑ 14:25, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't think that the sense 2 is redundant; it is the sense 3 that I think redundant. I can go to the same (selfsame) school as you do, or work on the same wiki project, but I cannot have the selfsame hair. The hair is only qualitatively same but not numerically; each atom of my hair is absent in your hair, no matter how similar our hair can be. When I get a haircut, you can keep your long hair. My hair and your hair are two distinct objects. --Dan Polansky 15:59, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Right, but what Equinox said about senses 1 and 3 seems correct. The question IMO then is whether that means that we should list them as separate senses. Certainly the list of words that can be substituted for same differs between sense 1 and sense 3: "the person who phoned", "the age my grandfather had been", but not "cloudy and sunny in the day" nor "going in the direction". That said, I still don't know. Anyone with ideas? (See also [[talk:coprime]], but this case seems to me to be more two-sense-worthy than that.) —msh210℠ (talk) 16:13, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
 * An example sentence that would better fit the formulation of the sense 3 would be this: The person who wrote On Denoting is the same person as the one who wrote The Problems of Philosophy. Here were have two specifications or definite descriptions that identify the same person. Nonetheless, I think this example sentence fits well to the sense 1. --Dan Polansky 16:05, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
 * So perhaps if sense 3 is kept it should be reworded? The Russell sentence seems to apply to sense 1, as Dan notes. Sense 3 can be something like "one" . —msh210℠ (talk) 16:17, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
 * (after edit conflict) I see what you mean, in the reply you gave above your immediately preceding reply. We could have more senses that are only one sense semantically, if the senses differ significantly in the grammar of their use. This would mean that the third and fourth example sentences (Identical twins, Peter and Anna) that I have added to sense 1 would be moved to sense 3. And you're right: the term "one" replaces nicely "the same" in We were all going in the same direction, although it works not so great for the Peter and Anna sentence. I am not sure having distinct sense lines is the best option, but it is at least a plausible one. --Dan Polansky 16:54, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

 * I think there are three senses here, just not everso well defined or usex-ed. Everyone agrees 2 is separate (I think), but defining it as "similar" seems way off to me and misses the point; I would say "having identical characteristics or attributes" which makes a better connection with the primary senses. Of the other two, one is about stating an identity between two (or more) things ("The Romans considered Zeus to be the same god as their Jupiter", "I left school at the same age you did"), and a second thing or clause has to be mentioned; whereas the second is about expressing the individual identity of a single thing ("Zeus and Jupiter are the same god", "we both left school at the same age"), a usage which didn't appear until some four centuries later. < class="latinx" >Ƿidsiþ 16:48, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I tend to agree with you about sense 2: "similar" stands in contrast to "same". When I say that two things have the same color, they do not need to have absolutely the same color, but to say that their color is similar is much weaker. But the formulation "having identical characteristics or attributes" seem to apply poorly to colors, unless you construe colors as having characteristics or attributes, which you can do: a color has hue, saturation and intensity. When two things have the same shape, is it that the shapes are having identical characteristics or attributes? Sameness of colors and shapes seems tricky to me. --Dan Polansky 17:06, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I think "same color" uses sense 1 of same: identical. (It may be an exaggeration of "identical'.) It's not sense 2, which is saying thatthe two things are actually different objects but match one another somehow: "you and I have the same hair", "I have the same briefcase as he". The colors are identical (or close to it), whereas the briefcases are copies churned out by the same designer and the hair is merely done identically. —msh210℠ (talk) 17:39, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
 * "Same color" uses identical for sure, but in which sense of "identical"? Are you saying that "the two apples have the same color" uses the sense of numerically identical AKA selfsame? I guess it makes some sense, at least grammatically: the color is in singular. OTOH, in "they have a different color", there is also color in singular. --Dan Polansky 18:28, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes. —msh210℠ (talk) 19:05, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I think one or both of you are missing the point (well, my point anyway). "Same colour" could be either sense depending on what the sentence does. "This apple is the same colour as that one" is sense one (above), whereas "These two apples have the same colour" is sense 3. The issue is that in sense 1 x is the same AS or WHICH or WITH y, whereas in sense 3 x and y are simply the same one thing. They seem similar but the underlying sense is different and the second was a much later development in English. < class="latinx" >Ƿidsiþ 19:50, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I was merely commenting on the impossibility of its being of sense 2. I certainly don't doubt you on the etymology, but am still not sure it warrants a separate sense, though I think so, as I noted at 16:13, 15 November 2010 (UTC), above. —msh210℠ (talk) 20:10, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
 * See also [[talk:coprime]]. —msh210℠ (talk) 17:16, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
 * (Unindent): Thanks, there are the two separate senses for coprime, exemplified by (a) 24 and 35 are coprime, and (b) 24 is coprime to 35. I do not think I would have kept two senses only because of two separate grammars. In any case, the analogy with coprime seems very fitting. As regards "same", the duplication of senses because of different grammar will need to occur for both major senses: numerically same, qualitatively same. What about "in love": "A and B are in love" while "A is in love with B"; well, yes, in love has two senses. And "A and B are equal" while "A is equal to B"; "A and B are similar" while "A is similar to B"; "A and B are equivalent" while "A is equivalent to B"; "A and B are identical" while "A is identical to B" (duplication for at least two senses); "A and B are analogous" while "A is analogous to B"; similarly for "homologous", "indistinguishable", "coextensive", maybe "congruous" and "incongruous"; basically all sorts of adjectives referring to symmetric dyadic relations. Hm. --Dan Polansky 18:00, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
 * One more note: It seems better to me to place this sort of grammar information to a usage note than to senses. The grammatical sugar is basically this: "A and B are " usually means "A is and B is ", while "A and B are " often means "A is to or with B". I have checked dictionaries at OneLook, and most of them do not split senses by this grammatical distinction.
 * One more find (there are probably many): related. --Dan Polansky 18:23, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The point I thought I made is that this "grammatical" difference is a historical difference (this is not the case with "coprime" or "related"). That may not seem important to you, but it represents a very different way of thinking about the concept, and if we had more citations that would be clear. < class="latinx" >Ƿidsiþ 14:58, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * It is not clear to me that the historical development of "the same" you are referring to has brought a new sense rather than a new sort of syntactic sugar for dyadic adjectives. If such a historical development cannot so easily be traced for adjectives like "related", "similar", or "analogous" (I do not know whether it can or cannot), it is probably because their grammar has been modeled on the grammar of "the same". --Dan Polansky 16:29, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

kept. -- Prince Kassad 09:35, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Merge senses?
I don't see much difference (except specialisation) between sense 1 ("not different or other") and sense 4 ("a reply of confirmation or identity"). Equinox ◑ 23:17, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
 * For what it's worth, the OED has a separate sense for the latter (B.4.b). The OED nests the "reply of confirmation of identity" type meaning under an "aforesaid" meaning, which we don't have here, and classifies it as a pronoun (which is odd, because it has the definite article). I like having a separate sense, but think it should be nested under another. — Eru·tuon 00:07, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

the same
Isn't it an adverb meaning equally or in the same way too? --Backinstadiums (talk) 14:27, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

 * Yes, the same is an adverb, but same alone is not. See separate entry. Equinox ◑ 14:45, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
 * What entry? I am (Redirected from the same) --Backinstadiums (talk) 14:48, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Fixed. I think there is another meaning for "the same" - (Biblical?). Thinking . . . SemperBlotto (talk) 14:57, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Adjective: being the one previously mentioned or indicated; aforesaid "There was a man in Jerusalem, whose name was Simeon; and the same man was just and devout" (King James Bible). https://ahdictionary.com/word/search.html?q=same --Backinstadiums (talk) 22:58, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

adverb: in an identical manner same adverb (usually the same) --Backinstadiums (talk) 18:08, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

(the) same again
Please give me the same thing as last time. Usually used in reference to a drink, especially an alcoholic one. ''A: "What'll it be, Bob?" B: "Same again, Al." A: "Right, two beers and two whiskeys, coming up."'' https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/the+same+again --Backinstadiums (talk) 18:25, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

The devil ain't on a level same as him
Can I add the following quote? The devil ain't on a level same as him --Backinstadiums (talk) 17:31, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
 * They've got to earn a living, the same as anybody else. --Backinstadiums (talk) 15:45, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:same


text: gratior

title: gratior


text: gratiores

title: gratiores


text: gratiora

title: gratiora


text: gratioris

title: gratioris


text: gratiorum

title: gratiorum


text: gratiori

title: gratiori


text: gratiorem

title: gratiorem


text: gratiore

title: gratiore


text: gratioribus

title: gratioribus


text: uniformoj

title: uniformoj


text: uncoj

title: uncoj


text: uniformon

title: uniformon


text: uncon

title: uncon


text: uniformojn

title: uniformojn


text: uncojn

title: uncojn


text: unuiĝoj

title: unuiĝoj


text: unuiĝon

title: unuiĝon


text: unuiĝojn

title: unuiĝojn


text:
nongeospatial

Adjective

 * 1) Not geospatial.

title: nongeospatial


text:
gratulatio

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) congratulation
 * 2) rejoicing, joy

title: gratulatio


text:
anslutning

Noun

 * 1) a connection

title: anslutning


text: gratulationes

title: gratulationes


text: gratulationis

title: gratulationis


text: gratulationum

title: gratulationum


text: gratulationi

title: gratulationi


text: gratulationibus

title: gratulationibus


text: gratulationem

title: gratulationem


text: gratulatione

title: gratulatione


text:
ansluta

Etymology
, like German

Verb

 * 1) to connect, to join

title: ansluta


text:
gratulor

Etymology
Disputed. Possible solutions are:
 * From *grātulus, diminutive of, + . Confer.
 * For *grātitulor, from + -tulor, from the root of . Confer.

Verb

 * 1) to congratulate
 * 2) to rejoice
 * 3) to give thanks
 * 1) to give thanks
 * 1) to give thanks
 * 1) to give thanks

title: gratulor


text: gratularis

title: gratularis


text: gratulatur

title: gratulatur


text: gratulamur

title: gratulamur


text: gratulamini

title: gratulamini


text: gratulantur

title: gratulantur


text: gratulabor

title: gratulabor


text: gratulaberis

title: gratulaberis


text: gratulabitur

title: gratulabitur


text: gratulabimur

title: gratulabimur


text: gratulabimini

title: gratulabimini


text: gratulabuntur

title: gratulabuntur


text: gratulabar

title: gratulabar


text: gratulabaris

title: gratulabaris


text: gratulabatur

title: gratulabatur


text: gratulabamur

title: gratulabamur


text: gratulabamini

title: gratulabamini


text: gratulabantur

title: gratulabantur


text: gratuler

title: gratuler


text: gratuleris

title: gratuleris


text: gratuletur

title: gratuletur


text: gratulemur

title: gratulemur


text: gratulemini

title: gratulemini


text: gratulentur

title: gratulentur


text: gratularer

title: gratularer


text: gratulareris

title: gratulareris


text: gratularetur

title: gratularetur


text: gratularemur

title: gratularemur


text: gratularemini

title: gratularemini


text: gratularentur

title: gratularentur


text: gratulare

title: gratulare


text: gratulator

title: gratulator


text: gratulantor

title: gratulantor


text: gratulari

title: gratulari


text:
ខ្ទឹមស

Noun

 * 1) garlic, onion

title: ខ្ទឹមស


text:
gratulatus

Etymology
Perfect participle of

Participle

 * 1) congratulated
 * 2) rejoiced

title: gratulatus


text: gratulata

title: gratulata


text: gratulatum

title: gratulatum


text: gratulati

title: gratulati


text: gratulatae

title: gratulatae


text: gratulatorum

title: gratulatorum


text: gratulatarum

title: gratulatarum


text: gratulato

title: gratulato


text: gratulatis

title: gratulatis


text: gratulatam

title: gratulatam


text: gratulatos

title: gratulatos


text: gratulatas

title: gratulatas


text:
gravior

Adjective

 * 1) more heavy, pregnant, grave
 * 1) more heavy, pregnant, grave

title: gravior


text: gravius

title: gravius


text: graviores

title: graviores


text: graviora

title: graviora


text: gravioris

title: gravioris


text: graviorum

title: graviorum


text: graviori

title: graviori


text: graviorem

title: graviorem


text: graviore

title: graviore


text: gravioribus

title: gravioribus


text:
ansluten

Adjective

 * 1) connected
 * 2) member (of a trade union)

title: ansluten


text: gravissimus

title: gravissimus


text: gravissimum

title: gravissimum


text: gravissimae

title: gravissimae


text: gravissimorum

title: gravissimorum


text: gravissimarum

title: gravissimarum


text: gravissimis

title: gravissimis


text: gravissimam

title: gravissimam


text: gravissimos

title: gravissimos


text: gravissimas

title: gravissimas


text:
ក្របី

Etymology 1
From, , , , , from. Cognate with 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) water buffalo

Etymology 2
From or.

Noun

 * 1) monkey (in folk tales)

title: ក្របី


text:
trimphone

Etymology
, originally a trademark, with trim explained as Tone Ring Illuminator Model.

Noun

 * 1)  A luxury telephone of the 1960s with a then-innovative electronic ringer and illuminated dial.

title: trimphone


text: trimphones

title: trimphones


text:
harpago

Etymology
From 🇨🇬, from, of uncertain origin.

Noun

 * 1) grappling hook, grappling iron

title: harpago


text: harpagones

title: harpagones


text: harpagonis

title: harpagonis


text: harpagonum

title: harpagonum


text: harpagoni

title: harpagoni


text: harpagonibus

title: harpagonibus


text: harpagonem

title: harpagonem


text:
harpagone

Noun

 * 1)  The clasping organ of male genitalia, one of the gonopods

title: harpagone


text:
apparitionist

Noun

 * 1) A believer in apparitions.

title: apparitionist


text: apparitionists

title: apparitionists


text:
hiemandus

Etymology
Future passive participle (gerundive) of

Participle

 * 1) which is to be wintered
 * 2) which is to be frozen

title: hiemandus


text: hiemanda

title: hiemanda


text: hiemandum

title: hiemandum


text: hiemandi

title: hiemandi


text: hiemandae

title: hiemandae


text: hiemandorum

title: hiemandorum


text: hiemandarum

title: hiemandarum


text: hiemando

title: hiemando


text: hiemandis

title: hiemandis


text: hiemandam

title: hiemandam


text: hiemandos

title: hiemandos


text: hiemandas

title: hiemandas


text: hiemande

title: hiemande


text:
Analgin

Etymology
Probably from.

Proper noun

 * 1) A brand of metamizole.

title: Analgin


text: stöden

title: stöden


text: honestissimus

title: honestissimus


text: honestissima

title: honestissima


text: honestissimum

title: honestissimum


text: honestissimi

title: honestissimi


text: honestissimae

title: honestissimae


text: honestissimorum

title: honestissimorum


text: honestissimarum

title: honestissimarum


text: honestissimo

title: honestissimo


text: honestissimis

title: honestissimis


text: honestissimam

title: honestissimam


text: honestissimos

title: honestissimos


text: honestissimas

title: honestissimas


text: honestissime

title: honestissime


text: horridior

title: horridior


text: horridius

title: horridius


text: horridiores

title: horridiores


text: horridiora

title: horridiora


text: horridioris

title: horridioris


text: horridiorum

title: horridiorum


text: horridiori

title: horridiori


text: horridiorem

title: horridiorem


text: horridiore

title: horridiore


text: horridioribus

title: horridioribus


text:
preux chevalier

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) A valiant knight; any gallant gentleman.

Usage notes

 * Often italicized as a foreign borrowing.

title: preux chevalier


text: urbocentroj

title: urbocentroj


text: urbdomoj

title: urbdomoj


text: urbegoj

title: urbegoj


text:
vindicable

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) able to be vindicated; justifiable

title: vindicable


text:
hortans

Etymology
Present participle of.

Participle

 * 1) encouraging, exhorting

title: hortans


text: hortantes

title: hortantes


text: hortantia

title: hortantia


text: hortantis

title: hortantis


text: hortantium

title: hortantium


text: hortanti

title: hortanti


text: hortante

title: hortante


text: hortantibus

title: hortantibus


text: hortantem

title: hortantem


text:
acrawl

Adjective

 * 1) Crawling.
 * 2) * 1849,, The Green Hand, Part5, in , Volume66, No.408, October, 1849,
 * an’ be blowed if I knowed but I was buried in a churchyard, with the blasted worms all acrawl about me.
 * 1) * 1865, (translator),  of , PartI—The Hell, London: Macmillan, Canto29, p.208,
 * This [spirit] on the belly, on the shoulders that, / Of one another lay, and this acrawl / Transferred himself along the mournful path.
 * 1) Full of or covered (with something that crawls or moves as if crawling).

title: acrawl


text:
slutligen

Adverb

 * 1) eventually

title: slutligen


text: hostiae

title: hostiae


text: hostiarum

title: hostiarum


text: hostiis

title: hostiis


text: hostiam

title: hostiam


text:
slutlig

Adjective

 * 1) final

title: slutlig


text: perspektivet

title: perspektivet


text: urbocentron

title: urbocentron


text: urbdomon

title: urbdomon


text: urbegon

title: urbegon


text: urbegojn

title: urbegojn


text: urbocentrojn

title: urbocentrojn


text: urbdomojn

title: urbdomojn


text: lyfts

title: lyfts


text: urbomezoj

title: urbomezoj


text: Shamika

title: Shamika


text: urbomezon

title: urbomezon


text:
peregrinaatio

Etymology
(see 🇨🇬), ultimately from.

Noun

 * 1)  A long journey abroad by the sons of noble families with the general purpose of gaining education and fostering relationships with the nobility of other countries.

title: peregrinaatio


text: urbomezojn

title: urbomezojn


text: humanior

title: humanior


text: utopioj

title: utopioj


text: utilecon

title: utilecon


text: humaniores

title: humaniores


text:
humaniora

Proper noun

 * 1) the humanities

Etymology
Borrowed from.

Etymology
From, from.

Noun

 * , the study of language, literature, the arts, and philosophy, sometimes including religion.

Noun

 * 1) the humanities

title: humaniora


text: humanioris

title: humanioris


text: humaniorum

title: humaniorum


text: humaniori

title: humaniori


text: humaniorem

title: humaniorem


text: humaniore

title: humaniore


text: humanioribus

title: humanioribus


text: utopion

title: utopion


text: utopiojn

title: utopiojn


text: vagonaroj

title: vagonaroj


text: humanissimus

title: humanissimus


text: humanissima

title: humanissima


text: humanissimum

title: humanissimum


text: vagonaron

title: vagonaron


text: humanissimi

title: humanissimi


text: humanissimae

title: humanissimae


text: humanissimorum

title: humanissimorum


text: vagonoj

title: vagonoj


text: humanissimarum

title: humanissimarum


text: lyftens

title: lyftens


text: humanissimo

title: humanissimo


text: humanissimis

title: humanissimis


text: humanissimam

title: humanissimam


text: humanissimos

title: humanissimos


text: humanissimas

title: humanissimas


text: vagonarojn

title: vagonarojn


text: lyftar

title: lyftar


text: vagonon

title: vagonon


text: lyftars

title: lyftars


text: lyftarna

title: lyftarna


text: vagonojn

title: vagonojn


text: lyftarnas

title: lyftarnas


text: rastras

title: rastras


text:
lyftare

Noun

 * 1) a lifter

title: lyftare


text:
дарёному коню в зубы не смотрят

Proverb

 * 1) don't look a gift horse in the mouth

title: дарёному коню в зубы не смотрят


text:
videowall

Noun

 * 1) A bank of tiled videoscreens forming one large screen on a wall.

title: videowall


text: videowalls

title: videowalls


text:
humanitas

Etymology
From ; as a.

Noun

 * 1) humanity, human nature
 * 2) humaneness, humane conduct, philanthropy
 * 3) kindness, kindliness, courtesy, politeness
 * 4) refinement, culture, civilization, good breeding
 * 1) refinement, culture, civilization, good breeding

title: humanitas


text: humanitates

title: humanitates


text: humanitatis

title: humanitatis


text: humanitatum

title: humanitatum


text: humanitati

title: humanitati


text: humanitatibus

title: humanitatibus


text: humanitatem

title: humanitatem


text: humanitate

title: humanitate


text: humiliores

title: humiliores


text: humiliora

title: humiliora


text: humilioris

title: humilioris


text: humiliorum

title: humiliorum


text: humiliori

title: humiliori


text: humiliorem

title: humiliorem


text: humiliore

title: humiliore


text: humilioribus

title: humilioribus


text:
artboard

Noun

 * 1)  An on-screen design surface in a drawing application.

title: artboard


text: artboards

title: artboards


text:
backspaceable

Adjective

 * 1)  Supporting a backspace function.

title: backspaceable


text:
boosies

Etymology 1
From, “cow stall”. See.

Etymology 2
Compare,.

Noun

 * 1)  A woman's breasts.

title: boosies


text:
nonsevere

Adjective

 * 1) Not severe.
 * They treated patients with nonsevere injuries after the more severe cases.

title: nonsevere


text:
beroende

Adjective

 * 1) depending
 * Vi är beroende av Guds stöd
 * We are depending on God's support
 * 1) addicted
 * Min granne är beroende av kaffe
 * My neighbor is addicted to coffee

Noun

 * 1) dependence, dependency; the state of being dependent
 * en god påminnelse om vårt beroende av Gud
 * a good reminder of our dependency on God
 * Varje beroende man skapar ökar kompileringstiden.
 * Every dependency you create increases the compile time.
 * 1) an addiction
 * ... är en film om destruktiva beroenden, främst alkohol och droger
 * ... is a film about destructive addictions, primarily alcohol and drugs

title: beroende


text: Category:Kyrgyz proper nouns

title: Category:Kyrgyz proper nouns


text: Category:ky:Countries

title: Category:ky:Countries


text: Category:ky:Names

title: Category:ky:Names


text:
Оруссия

Etymology
Borrowed from, from.

title: Оруссия


text:
Talk:blogish

I feel as though this should be "common misspelling of bloggish:" (which is more common), mainly because of the traditional spelling rules for -g- and -gg-. I suppose those rules aren't well known any more :( Equinox ◑ 12:14, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

title: Talk:blogish


text: Category:ky:Cities

title: Category:ky:Cities


text: Category:ky:Capital cities

title: Category:ky:Capital cities


text:
westerliness

Noun

 * 1) Westerly position.

title: westerliness


text:
Westernness

Noun

 * 1) The quality of being Western.

title: Westernness


text:
yksinhuoltajuus

Etymology
, or equivalently

Noun

 * 1) sole custody arrangement whereby only one parent has physical and legal custody of a child

title: yksinhuoltajuus


text:
whalecraft

Noun

 * 1) The art and techniques of whaling.

title: whalecraft


text: Moscó

title: Moscó


text:
Кытай

Etymology
From, probably via. Cognate with 🇨🇬.

Derived terms

 * 1) кытайлык (Chinese)
 * 2) кытаялма (orange)

Etymology
From, probably via. Cognate with.

Proper noun

 * 1) China

Etymology
Ultimately from via.

Proper noun

 * 1) China

title: Кытай


text:
uppnå

Verb

 * 1) to reach (a goal)

title: uppnå


text:
Чин

Etymology
.

Proper noun

 * 1) China

title: Чин


text: överväganden

title: överväganden


text:
flumed

Etymology
Borrowed from.

Noun

 * 1) river

title: flumed


text: flumeds

title: flumeds


text:
azerbaidžani

Etymology
<

Noun

 * 1) Azerbaijani, Azeri language

title: azerbaidžani


text:
dustodik

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) industrial

title: dustodik


text:
övervägande

Adjective

 * 1) predominant
 * En övervägande majoritet av aktieägarna sade ja till köpet
 * A predominant majority of shareholders approved of the purchase

Adverb

 * 1) predominantly
 * Projektet förväntas också ha en övervägande positiv påverkan på folkhälsan
 * The project is also expected to have a predominantly positive influence on the health of the population

Noun

 * 1) a consideration
 * 2) a recital (a telling in detail and due order)
 * såsom framgår av det femte övervägandet
 * as described in the fifth recital in the preamble to the decision

title: övervägande


text:
topön

Verb

 * 1) to be situated

title: topön


text:
dabinön

Verb

 * 1)  to exist

title: dabinön


text: azerbaidžanin

title: azerbaidžanin


text: azerin

title: azerin


text: legads

title: legads


text:
kulturutredning

Noun

 * 1) a government report on the politics of cultural affairs, in particular SOU 2009:16

title: kulturutredning


text: genomföras

title: genomföras


text:
bumot

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) building

title: bumot


text: bumots

title: bumots


text:
förordning

Noun

 * 1) an ordinance, a resolution, a decree, an instruction (especially from the government to an agency)

title: förordning


text:
azerinkielinen

Adjective

 * 1) Azeri, Azeri language written or expressed in Azeri
 * 2) Azeri speaking using Azeri as a means of daily communication
 * 1) Azeri speaking using Azeri as a means of daily communication

title: azerinkielinen


text:
nulädik

Adjective

 * 1) modern

title: nulädik


text:
förordna

Etymology
, like German

Verb

 * 1) to resolve, to decree, to instruct (send instructions to a subordinate agency)
 * 2) to appoint (a person to a duty)

title: förordna


text:
Ket

Noun

 * 1) A member of a people of Krasnoyarsk Krai in Central Siberia, Russia.

Proper noun

 * , a tributary of the.
 * 1) The Yeniseian language of the Ket people.

Translations

 * Breton: keteg
 * Chinese: 愒語, 愒语
 * Chuvash: кет чӗлхи
 * Czech: ketština
 * Dutch:
 * Esperanto: Keta lingvo
 * Estonian: keti keel
 * Finnish: ketti, ketin kieli
 * French: kete
 * German: Ketisch
 * Italian: ket
 * Japanese: ケット語
 * Ket: остыганна ка’
 * Korean: ^케트-어
 * Norwegian: ketisk
 * Polish:
 * Portuguese: ostiaco,
 * Russian: ке́тский язы́к
 * Spanish:
 * Swedish: ketiska
 * Tamil: கெட் மொழி

Symbol

 * 1)  history of Ireland
 * °N, °W
 * °N, °W
 * °N, °W

title: Ket


text:
förordnande

Noun

 * 1) an appointment (of a person to a duty)

title: förordnande


text:
horit

Noun

 * 1) horizon

title: horit


text: Na-Dené

title: Na-Dené


text:
Dene-Yeniseian

Proper noun

 * 1) A proposed language family linking the Na-Dene languages of North America and the Yeniseian languages of Siberia.

Translations

 * Dutch: Dené-Jenisejisch

title: Dene-Yeniseian


text: Dené-Yeniseian

title: Dené-Yeniseian


text: cims

title: cims


text:
gianagretik

Adjective

 * 1) gigantic

title: gianagretik


text:
miotik

Adjective

 * 1) dirty

title: miotik


text:
engagemang

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) commitment, interest, enthusiasm, involvement, the degree of voluntary participation

title: engagemang


text: programmet

title: programmet


text:
hemsida

Noun

 * 1) a home page, a web page, a web site

title: hemsida


text: Category:nv:Mammals

title: Category:nv:Mammals


text:
kartlägga

Verb

 * 1) to map, to map out, to perform cartography
 * 2) to gain knowledge of (something (more complex)) through investigation; to map, to survey, to investigate

Usage notes
Identify often works as a translation as well, whenever synonymous with "gain knowledge of."

title: kartlägga


text:
demön

Verb

 * 1)  to demonstrate

title: demön


text: Category:Navajo terms suffixed with -í

title: Category:Navajo terms suffixed with -í


text:
medverka

Etymology
, like German

Verb

 * 1) to participate, to contribute
 * 2)  aid and abet

title: medverka


text:
kleiliko

Adverb

 * 1) clearly

title: kleiliko


text:
plöp

Noun

 * 1) prosperity

title: plöp


text:
motverka

Verb

 * 1) to remedy

title: motverka


text:
Template:vo-decl-noun-np

declension of
 * 1 status as a case is disputed
 * 2 in later, non-classical Volapük only

title: Template:vo-decl-noun-np


text:
samspela

Verb

 * 1) to interact, to interplay, to collaborate

title: samspela


text:
Talk:Ajay

Hi! my name is ajay.I wish to know my name's english meaning

 * Why not look it up in a dictionary? --> Ajay Equinox ◑ 14:22, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

title: Talk:Ajay


text: Kaiden

title: Kaiden


text:
mutön

Verb

 * 1)  to compel infinitive of must

Usage notes

 * The definition would just be must were it not for the fact that mutön is an infinitive and must is not, and does not have, an infinitive.

title: mutön


text:
plöpön

Verb

 * 1)  to prosper

title: plöpön


text:
logön

Verb

 * 1) to see

title: logön


text: Category:Volapük terms suffixed with -ön


text:
zilo

Adverb

 * 1) enthusiastically, diligently said, e.g., about doing work

title: zilo


text:
åstadkomma

Verb

 * 1) to achieve, to accomplish

title: åstadkomma


text: åstadkommer

title: åstadkommer


text: åstadkom

title: åstadkom


text:
åstadkommande

Noun

 * 1) an achievement

title: åstadkommande


text: åstadkommas

title: åstadkommas


text: åstadkoms

title: åstadkoms


text: åstadkommes

title: åstadkommes


text: åstadkommandes

title: åstadkommandes


text:
åstadkommen

Adjective

 * 1) achieved, accomplished

title: åstadkommen


text:
kvisinöp

Etymology
Borrowed from.

Noun

 * 1) kitchen

title: kvisinöp


text: välkomnar

title: välkomnar


text: Category:vo:Rooms

title: Category:vo:Rooms


text: välkomnade

title: välkomnade


text: välkomnas

title: välkomnas


text: välkomnades

title: välkomnades


text: Category:vo:Technology

title: Category:vo:Technology


text: välkomnats

title: välkomnats


text: välkomnandes

title: välkomnandes


text: labobs

title: labobs


text:
fidacem

Noun

 * 1) dining room

title: fidacem


text:
joint custody

Noun

 * 1)  An arrangement whereby  parents or guardians (who are not a couple or cease to be one) share the physical and legal custody of a child.

Translations

 * Catalan: custòdia compartida
 * Chinese:
 * Mandarin: 共同監護權
 * Finnish:
 * French:, , garde conjointe
 * Galician: custodia compartida
 * German: gemeinsames Sorgerecht
 * Hungarian: közös felügyeleti jog
 * Portuguese: guarda compartilhada, guarda partilhada , guarda conjunta, residência alternada
 * Spanish: custodia compartida, tenencia compartida

title: joint custody


text:
välkomnad

Adjective

 * 1) welcomed (having been greeted as welcome)

title: välkomnad


text: välkomnat

title: välkomnat


text:
samordna

Verb

 * 1) to coordinate, to organize

title: samordna


text:
User talk:Soued031

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, welcome to Wiktionary, and thank you for your contribution so far. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

 * How to edit a page is a concise list of technical guidelines to the wiki format we use here: how to, for example, make text boldfaced or create hyperlinks. Feel free to practice in the sandbox. If you would like a slower introduction we have a short tutorial.
 * Entry layout explained (ELE) is a detailed policy documenting how Wiktionary pages should be formatted. All entries should conform to this standard, the easiest way to do this is to copy exactly an existing page for a similar word.
 * Our Criteria for inclusion (CFI) define exactly which words Wiktionary is interested in including. There is also a list of things that Wiktionary is not for a higher level overview.
 * The FAQ aims to answer most of your remaining questions, and there are several help pages that you can browse for more information.
 * We have discussion rooms in which you can ask any question about Wiktionary or its entries, a glossary of our technical jargon, and some hints for dealing with the more common communication issues.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wiktionarian! If you have any questions, bring them to the Information desk, or ask me on my talk page. If you do so, please sign your posts with four tildes: ~ which automatically produces your username and the current date and time.

Again, welcome! Mglovesfun (talk) 15:15, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Letzeburgesch
Please do not move Letzeburgesch. It is an English name, not a Luxembourgish one. The spelling that you are moving it to is not English, and it is misspelled in Luxembourgish. See Lëtzebuergesch for the Luxembourgish word. —Stephen (Talk) 15:31, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

I'm so sorry I think I need some sleep :/. Thanks for acting so fast

title: User talk:Soued031


text:
samordnare

Noun

 * 1) a coordinator, an organizer

title: samordnare