text:
Rhymes:Dutch/aːt

Two syllables

 * agaat
 * bataat
 * beaat
 * belaad
 * belaadt
 * bepraat
 * beraad
 * beraadt
 * bestraat
 * boraat
 * castraat
 * chloraat
 * chromaat
 * citaat
 * cognaat
 * dictaat
 * doorwaad
 * doorwaadt
 * dukaat
 * fanaat
 * filtraat
 * formaat
 * fosfaat
 * frustraat
 * gebaat
 * geblaat
 * gebraad
 * gehaat
 * gelaat
 * gepraat
 * gewaad
 * granaat
 * herlaad
 * herlaadt
 * hiaat
 * hydraat
 * kanaat
 * karaat
 * klimaat
 * kordaat
 * Kroaat
 * kwadraat
 * lactaat
 * legaat
 * magnaat
 * mandaat
 * muskaat
 * nitraat
 * oblaat
 * ohaat
 * ontlaad
 * ontlaadt
 * ontlaat
 * ontraad
 * ontraadt
 * ornaat
 * paraat
 * passaat
 * piraat
 * prelaat
 * primaat
 * privaat
 * probaat
 * prostaat
 * senaat
 * soldaat
 * spagaat
 * sulfaat
 * tomaat
 * traktaat
 * vergaat
 * verlaad
 * verlaadt
 * verlaat
 * verraad
 * verraadt
 * versmaad
 * versmaadt
 * verstaat
 * Vulgaat

Three syllables

 * accuraat
 * acetaat
 * acrobaat
 * adequaat
 * advocaat
 * affricaat
 * aggregaat
 * apostaat
 * apparaat
 * aspiraat
 * attentaat
 * autocraat
 * automaat
 * Aziaat
 * bureaucraat
 * carbonaat
 * celibaat
 * concentraat
 * concordaat
 * condensaat
 * consulaat
 * convocaat
 * correlaat
 * cyclamaat
 * decanaat
 * dekenaat
 * delegaat
 * delicaat
 * democraat
 * derivaat
 * desolaat
 * desperaat
 * diplomaat
 * disparaat
 * distillaat
 * doctoraat
 * duplicaat
 * emiraat
 * eurocraat
 * exsudaat
 * fabricaat
 * giromaat
 * glutamaat
 * graduaat
 * granulaat
 * implantaat
 * infiltraat
 * inkarnaat
 * internaat
 * intestaat
 * juvenaat
 * kalifaat
 * kameraad
 * kandidaat
 * labiaat
 * laminaat
 * laureaat
 * lectoraat
 * lemniscaat
 * licentiaat
 * magistraat
 * majoraat
 * markizaat
 * mecenaat
 * mentoraat
 * metterdaad
 * moderaat
 * monocraat
 * neonaat
 * nootmuskaat
 * noviciaat
 * numismaat
 * obligaat
 * obstinaat
 * ochlocraat
 * opiaat
 * ordinaat
 * overlaad
 * overlaadt
 * pastoraat
 * patriciaat
 * patronaat
 * pensionaat
 * plagiaat
 * plutocraat
 * postulaat
 * potentaat
 * potestaat
 * predicaat
 * preparaat
 * prioraat
 * psychopaat
 * rabbinaat
 * rabiaat
 * rectoraat
 * referaat
 * regentaat
 * renegaat
 * reservaat
 * resultaat
 * separaat
 * silicaat
 * sociopaat
 * sublimaat
 * sultanaat
 * surrogaat
 * syndicaat
 * technocraat
 * telepaat
 * theocraat
 * thermostaat
 * transplantaat
 * tribunaat
 * unicaat
 * vertebraat

Four syllables

 * agglomeraat
 * apostolaat
 * aristocraat
 * barbituraat
 * certificaat
 * concubinaat
 * conglomeraat
 * coördinaat
 * diaconaat
 * directoraat
 * duümviraat
 * ejaculaat
 * electoraat
 * emeritaat
 * episcopaat
 * fysiocraat
 * homeopaat
 * inaccuraat
 * inadequaat
 * indelicaat
 * matriarchaat
 * monitoraat
 * notariaat
 * osteopaat
 * patriarchaat
 * poelepetaat
 * pontificaat
 * postgraduaat
 * professoraat
 * protectoraat
 * regeneraat
 * salariaat
 * triumviraat
 * vicariaat

Five syllables

 * actuariaat
 * antiquariaat
 * baccalaureaat
 * commissariaat
 * impresariaat
 * ordinariaat
 * proletariaat
 * secretariaat
 * sociaaldemocraat
 * voluntariaat

title: Rhymes:Dutch/aːt


text:
Rhymes:Dutch/aːts

One syllable

 * kaats
 * laats
 * plaats
 * schaats

Two syllables

 * verplaats

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Rhymes:Dutch/aːts


text:
Rhymes:Dutch/aːx

One syllable

 * blaag
 * draag
 * graag
 * haag
 * jaag
 * klaag
 * kraag
 * laag
 * maag
 * plaag
 * Praag
 * slaag
 * traag
 * vaag
 * vlaag
 * vraag
 * waag
 * zaag

Two syllables

 * behaag
 * beklaag
 * gedraag
 * geklaag
 * gestaag
 * omlaag
 * vandaag
 * verdraag
 * verjaag
 * verlaag
 * vervaag

Three syllables

 * macrofaag
 * ondervraag
 * sarcofaag

title: Rhymes:Dutch/aːx


text:
duuss

Etymology
Borrowed from.

Adjective

 * 1) mild, gentle, tender, soft, not harsh

title: duuss


text:
Rhymes:Dutch/aːxs

One syllable

 * daags
 * Haags
 * laags
 * vaags

Two syllables

 * Carthaags

title: Rhymes:Dutch/aːxs


text:
Rhymes:Dutch/aːxst

One syllable

 * graagst
 * laagst
 * vaagst

title: Rhymes:Dutch/aːxst


text:
poffertjes

Etymology
Borrowed from.

Noun

 * 1) Traditional Dutch treats resembling fluffy pancakes, made with yeast and buckwheat flour.

title: poffertjes


text: Rhymes:Dutch/aːxt

title: Rhymes:Dutch/aːxt


text:
premarked

Adjective

 * 1) Having been marked in advance.

title: premarked


text:
roadability

Noun

 * 1) The quality or degree of being roadable.

title: roadability


text: sheafs

title: sheafs


text:
teleoperate

Verb

 * 1)  To operate (a device) remotely.

title: teleoperate


text:
Rhymes:Dutch/ɔfst

One syllable

 * dofst
 * grofst
 * tofst

title: Rhymes:Dutch/ɔfst


text: teleoperating

title: teleoperating


text: teleoperates

title: teleoperates


text: teleoperated

title: teleoperated


text:
Rhymes:Dutch/ɔmst

One syllable

 * domst
 * kromst
 * stomst

title: Rhymes:Dutch/ɔmst


text:
undraped

Adjective

 * 1) Not draped.

title: undraped


text:
nonspender

Noun

 * 1) One who does not spend money.

title: nonspender


text: nonspenders

title: nonspenders


text:
nonspending

Adjective

 * 1) Not spending money.

title: nonspending


text:
hillclimber

Noun

 * 1) One who takes part in hillclimbing.

title: hillclimber


text: hillclimbers

title: hillclimbers


text:
replacee

Noun

 * 1) That which is replaced.

title: replacee


text: replacees

title: replacees


text:
aloelike

Adjective

 * 1) Resembling or characteristic of aloe.

Translations

 * Polish:

title: aloelike


text:
microstamped

Adjective

 * 1) Marked by means of microstamping.

title: microstamped


text: microsporophylls

title: microsporophylls


text:
rechill

Verb

 * 1)  To chill again.

title: rechill


text: rechills

title: rechills


text: rechilled

title: rechilled


text: rechilling

title: rechilling


text:
downstater

Noun

 * 1) A person from downstate; usually specifically a person from downstate New York.
 * People from New York City, Hudson Valley, and Long Island are downstaters.

title: downstater


text: downstaters

title: downstaters


text: fastbreak

title: fastbreak


text: fastbreaks

title: fastbreaks


text:
fastballer

Noun

 * 1)  One who pitches fastballs.

title: fastballer


text: fastballers

title: fastballers


text:
froofy

Etymology
Diminutive of.

Adjective

 * 1)  Frilly; heavily ornamental; fancy; overly elaborate.

title: froofy


text:
minijoystick

Noun

 * 1) A small joystick.

title: minijoystick


text: minijoysticks

title: minijoysticks


text:
nongrocery

Adjective

 * 1) Not grocery.
 * Grocery stores increasingly stock a range of nongrocery items.

title: nongrocery


text: replow

title: replow


text:
replough

Verb

 * 1)  To plough again.

title: replough


text: replowing

title: replowing


text: reploughs

title: reploughs


text: reploughing

title: reploughing


text: reploughed

title: reploughed


text: replowed

title: replowed


text: replows

title: replows


text:
supersuccessful

Adjective

 * 1) Very highly successful.

title: supersuccessful


text: likelies

title: likelies


text:
relieflike

Adjective

 * 1) Resembling or characteristic of relief (the difference of elevations on a surface).

title: relieflike


text:
reconverge

Verb

 * 1)  To converge again.

title: reconverge


text: reconverging

title: reconverging


text: reconverges

title: reconverges


text: reconverged

title: reconverged


text:
reconvergence

Noun

 * 1) The process or point of reconverging.

title: reconvergence


text: reconvergences

title: reconvergences


text:
lacrosselike

Adjective

 * 1) Resembling or characteristic of the game of lacrosse.

title: lacrosselike


text: lacrosstitutes

title: lacrosstitutes


text:
nonauthorized

Adjective

 * 1) Not authorized.

title: nonauthorized


text:
seminationalized

Adjective

 * 1) Partly nationalized.

title: seminationalized


text:
treadwear

Noun

 * 1)  A numerical measure of how long the tread of a tire can be expected to last.

title: treadwear


text:
underpower

Verb

 * 1)  To supply with insufficient power.

title: underpower


text: underpowering

title: underpowering


text: underpowers

title: underpowers


text: falsisms

title: falsisms


text:
Pabeier

Noun

 * 1) paper
 * 2) document

title: Pabeier


text: rhetorical devices

title: rhetorical devices


text:
User:RSSupport

Hi, my name is Angel. People can find me mostly helping on SwiftIRC's network, irc.swiftirc.net, in #RSHelp. Helping RS users with their questions and helping those on access with moderation of the users. I've come and finally registered here to help with some minor edits, help clean up the vandalism, and give some suggestions.

Trying to unify my account across Wikipedia Foundation's sister projects. I also have a user page on http://runescape.wikia.com/wiki/User:RSHelp If there are other wiki's that may need some help, please let me know.

Thanks,

Angel

title: User:RSSupport


text:
Talk:hyponym

This word needs IPA or another way to demonstrate its pronunciation.

85.164.95.189 18:59, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

tiers of hyponymification
If you mess the tiers of hyponymification (they have orders, read Immanuel Kant but also taxonomists), the whole cladogram is a waste.

It is crucial to mention that!!!

 * tier of hyponymification (= rank of hyponymification) is a triple worded taxonomic noun

title: Talk:hyponym


text:
User talk:74.138.209.24

Hi! This is a dictionary, not an encyclopedia. So your articles about actors are likely to be deleted. --MaEr 18:59, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:74.138.209.24


text:
Talk:jejune

Woody Allen usage
In his film Love and Death, Allen uses his incorrect faux-French pronunciation then immediately says "I am one of the most  people I know."

That is clearly the joke, and therefore there is a strong implication that the first use was in fact correct, and he was simply using a rare word -- correctly pronounced -- for its comic effect. So has been taken as correct in good faith by many viewers for three decades.

Varlaam 19:30, 7 August 2011 (UTC) (who saw Love and Death on its original release)

title: Talk:jejune


text:
Dardanian

Noun

 * 1) A native or inhabitant of.

title: Dardanian


text: Dardanians

title: Dardanians


text: filagrees

title: filagrees


text:
User talk:DANE RAMADAN YOUSSEF

I wasn't trying to sell anything--to advertise, really. I just wanted to put my biography up on here. But I guess I should leave PREACH out of it. So there. I never VANDALIZED anything. I contributed some definitions to some very popular obscenities and ballet movements--I'm a gargantuan fan of both. But... that's all really. There. There you go. I'm trying to no longer have burned bridges in my life and I know I made some solid contributions. So... please, lift this damn exile. There needs to be peace again. No more bad blood. Serenity is what's good for the soul. --All The Best Possible, Dane Ramadan Youssef

 * Fair enough. I've removed the block. Please bear in mind that this is a dictionary project for defining existing words and is not intended for people to write a great deal about themselves; that is basically spam here. Equinox ◑ 20:18, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

 * You have twice re-added your vanity page while contributing nothing to the dictionary, so I have restored the block. Equinox ◑ 10:28, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:DANE RAMADAN YOUSSEF


text:
Talk:PeV

Translingual
Should this be translingual? Is it used in running test in other languages? Evidence? DCDuring TALK 19:58, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:PeV


text: womenservants

title: womenservants


text:
womanservant

Etymology
From ; equivalent to.

Noun

 * 1) A woman who is a servant; the female counterpart to a manservant.

title: womanservant


text:
ἐχθρός

Etymology
Probably from, perhaps with suffix. But compare 🇨🇬 from.

Adjective

 * 1)  hated, hateful
 * 2)  hating, hostile
 * 3)  enemy
 * 4)  it is displeasing, distasteful, unpleasant

title: ἐχθρός


text: rerestitution

title: rerestitution


text: آلاباما

title: آلاباما


text:
tiger bread

Etymology
From the pattern's resemblance to the coat of a tiger.

Noun

 * 1) A bread made with sesame oil and with a pattern baked into the top made by painting rice paste onto the surface prior to baking.

title: tiger bread


text: Equipe

title: Equipe


text: Rhymes:Dutch/yk

title: Rhymes:Dutch/yk


text:
Rhymes:Dutch/ym

Two syllables

 * kostuum
 * postuum

title: Rhymes:Dutch/ym


text:
Rhymes:Dutch/yp

One syllable

 * Huub
 * kuub

title: Rhymes:Dutch/yp


text:
Rhymes:Dutch/ys

One syllable

 * Guus
 * Suus
 * Truus

Two syllables

 * excuus
 * infuus

title: Rhymes:Dutch/ys


text: فلوریدا

title: فلوریدا


text:
funeralize

Verb

 * 1) To officiate at a funeral service for, to hold a funeral service for.
 * 2) * 1851, David S. Doggett, Sermon XXII: A New Year's Admonition, in A Collection of Original Sermons (Thomas P. Akers, editor), page 468:
 * Pardon me, for yielding to a temporary impulse of this character, at the hazard of seeming to funeralize, rather than compliment my congregation.

title: funeralize


text:
Rhymes:Dutch/yt

One syllable

 * bruut
 * buut
 * fuut
 * juut
 * kluut
 * Ruud
 * stuud
 * tuut

Two syllables

 * debuut
 * dispuut
 * minuut
 * saluut
 * statuut

Three syllables

 * absoluut
 * attribuut
 * convoluut
 * instituut

title: Rhymes:Dutch/yt


text:
Rhymes:Dutch/yx

One syllable

 * spuug

title: Rhymes:Dutch/yx


text:
Rhymes:Dutch/yxt

One syllable

 * spuugt

title: Rhymes:Dutch/yxt


text: funeralized

title: funeralized


text: funeralizing

title: funeralizing


text: funeralizes

title: funeralizes


text:
Rhymes:Dutch/ɔŋ

One syllable

 * drong
 * gong
 * jong
 * long
 * sprong
 * tong
 * wrong
 * zong

title: Rhymes:Dutch/ɔŋ


text:
کالیفرنیا

Etymology
.

title: کالیفرنیا


text:
Rhymes:Dutch/ɔŋk

One syllable

 * bonk
 * donk
 * honk
 * lonk
 * ronk
 * stonk
 * vonk
 * zonk

title: Rhymes:Dutch/ɔŋk


text:
postboomer

Adjective

 * 1) After the baby boomers.

Noun

 * 1) One born after the baby boomers.

title: postboomer


text:
Rhymes:Dutch/ɔŋt

One syllable

 * drongt
 * tongt
 * zongt

title: Rhymes:Dutch/ɔŋt


text: slopewashes

title: slopewashes


text: loesses

title: loesses


text:
Rhymes:Dutch/ɔŋkt

One syllable

 * bonkt
 * lonkt
 * ronkt
 * stonkt
 * vonkt
 * zonkt

title: Rhymes:Dutch/ɔŋkt


text:
unspirantized

Adjective

 * 1) Not spirantized.

title: unspirantized


text:
Rhymes:Dutch/ɔŋs

One syllable

 * jongs

title: Rhymes:Dutch/ɔŋs


text:
واشنگتن

Etymology
.

title: واشنگتن


text:
Rhymes:Dutch/ɔŋst

One syllable

 * jongst

title: Rhymes:Dutch/ɔŋst


text:
spirantize

Verb

 * 1)  To change (a consonant) to a spirant sound.

title: spirantize


text: spirantizing

title: spirantizing


text: spirantizes

title: spirantizes


text: spirantized

title: spirantized


text:
Rhymes:Dutch/ɔp

One syllable

 * dop
 * drop
 * flop
 * fop
 * hop
 * Job
 * klop
 * knop
 * kop
 * krop
 * lob
 * mop
 * nop
 * op
 * plop
 * pop
 * prop
 * Rob
 * schop
 * shop
 * slop
 * snob
 * sop
 * stop
 * strop
 * top

Two syllables

 * bergop
 * daarop
 * erop
 * galop
 * geklop
 * geplop
 * geprop
 * geschop
 * getob
 * hansop
 * hardop
 * klimop
 * luidop
 * ontpop
 * ontstop
 * rechtop
 * verkrop
 * verstop
 * voorop
 * waarop

Three syllables

 * achterop
 * bovenop
 * dubbelop
 * envelop
 * enveloppe
 * hogerop
 * onderop
 * tegenop
 * verderop

title: Rhymes:Dutch/ɔp


text: Rhymes:Dutch/ɔps

title: Rhymes:Dutch/ɔps


text:
Rhymes:Dutch/ɔpt

One syllable

 * klopt
 * kopt
 * lobt
 * schopt
 * stopt

title: Rhymes:Dutch/ɔpt


text:
begadkefat

Etymology
Constructed from the consonants involved:, , , , , and. Compare 🇨🇬, the Hebrew mnemonic.

Pronunciation

Noun

 * 1)  A phenomenon of spirantization affecting most plosive consonants of Biblical Hebrew and Aramaic when they are preceded by a vowel and not geminated; also any similar case of spirantization of postvocalic plosives in other languages, such as Berber.

Etymology
Same as above.

title: begadkefat


text: begadkephat

title: begadkephat


text: begedkefet

title: begedkefet


text:
Rhymes:Dutch/ɔr

One syllable

 * dor
 * hor
 * kor
 * lor
 * mor
 * nor
 * por
 * schor
 * tor

title: Rhymes:Dutch/ɔr


text:
Rhymes:Dutch/ɔrk

One syllable

 * ork
 * vork

title: Rhymes:Dutch/ɔrk


text:
Rhymes:Dutch/ɔrks

One syllable

 * orks

title: Rhymes:Dutch/ɔrks


text:
Rhymes:Dutch/ɔrkt

One syllable

 * vorkt

title: Rhymes:Dutch/ɔrkt


text:
littleleaf disease

Noun

 * 1) A disease of shortleaf pine caused by the mould.

title: littleleaf disease


text:
Rhymes:Dutch/ɔrm

One syllable

 * norm
 * storm
 * vorm
 * worm

title: Rhymes:Dutch/ɔrm


text:
polykalický

Adjective

 * 1) polycalic

title: polykalický


text:
Rhymes:Dutch/ɔrmt

One syllable

 * stormt
 * vormt

title: Rhymes:Dutch/ɔrmt


text:
Rhymes:Dutch/ɔrn

One syllable

 * torn

title: Rhymes:Dutch/ɔrn


text:
Rhymes:Dutch/ɔrnt

One syllable

 * tornt

title: Rhymes:Dutch/ɔrnt


text: embattlements

title: embattlements


text:
Veräin

Etymology
. The proper Luxembourgish form would be.

Noun

 * 1) club

title: Veräin


text:
embattlement

Noun

 * 1)  A battlement.
 * 2)  The state of being embattled.
 * 1)  The state of being embattled.
 * 1)  The state of being embattled.

title: embattlement


text:
Rhymes:Dutch/ɔrp

One syllable

 * dorp
 * worp

title: Rhymes:Dutch/ɔrp


text:
Rhymes:Dutch/ɔrs

One syllable

 * dors
 * fors
 * nors
 * tors

title: Rhymes:Dutch/ɔrs


text:
nerderati

Noun

 * 1)  An elite community of nerds.

title: nerderati


text:
γοργός

Etymology
. According to Frisk, this word is not related to 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬 nor to 🇨🇬.

Adjective

 * 1) grim, fierce, terrible
 * 2) spirited, vigorous
 * 3)  vehement, vigorous

Adjective

 * 1) swift, rapid, fast

title: γοργός


text:
Rhymes:Dutch/ɔrst

One syllable

 * borst
 * dorst
 * horst
 * korst
 * morst
 * torst
 * vorst
 * worst

title: Rhymes:Dutch/ɔrst


text: Wolofs

title: Wolofs


text: Wollof

title: Wollof


text: Wollofs

title: Wollofs


text:
Rhymes:Dutch/ɔrt

One syllable

 * fort
 * gort
 * kort
 * mort
 * port
 * schort
 * stort
 * word
 * wordt

title: Rhymes:Dutch/ɔrt


text: Wollemi pines

title: Wollemi pines


text: Rhymes:Dutch/ɔs

title: Rhymes:Dutch/ɔs


text:
xanthodermic

Adjective

 * 1) Having yellowish skin.

title: xanthodermic


text:
Rhymes:Dutch/ɔst

One syllable

 * host
 * klost
 * kost
 * lost
 * post
 * rost

Two syllables

 * agnost
 * bebost
 * compost
 * gehost
 * verlost

title: Rhymes:Dutch/ɔst


text:
Rhymes:Dutch/ɔt

One syllable

 * bod
 * bot
 * dot
 * God
 * god
 * grot
 * hot
 * kot
 * krot
 * lot
 * mot
 * plot
 * pot
 * rot
 * Schot
 * schot
 * slot
 * spot
 * tot
 * vlot
 * vod
 * zot

Two syllables

 * complot
 * gebod
 * genot
 * gespot
 * kapot
 * spaarpot
 * verbod
 * verrot
 * verzot
 * zelfspot

Three syllables

 * overschot

title: Rhymes:Dutch/ɔt


text: quadbits

title: quadbits


text:
Rhymes:Dutch/ɔts

One syllable

 * bots
 * Gods
 * hots
 * klots
 * knots
 * kots
 * plots
 * rots
 * Schots
 * schots
 * trots
 * vlots
 * zots

Two syllables

 * gebots
 * geklots

title: Rhymes:Dutch/ɔts


text:
Rhymes:Dutch/ɔx

Two syllables

 * bedrog
 * hertog
 * moloch
 * oorlog

title: Rhymes:Dutch/ɔx


text: quantroniums

title: quantroniums


text:
Rhymes:Dutch/ɔxs

One syllable

 * logs

title: Rhymes:Dutch/ɔxs


text:
Rhymes:Dutch/ɔxt

One syllable

 * bocht
 * kocht
 * krocht
 * mocht
 * pocht
 * tocht
 * vlocht
 * vocht
 * zocht

Three syllables

 * onderzocht
 * uitgezocht

title: Rhymes:Dutch/ɔxt


text:
وابسته

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) dependent, attached, related, connected

Noun

 * 1) attaché

title: وابسته


text: Rhymes:Dutch/ɑf

title: Rhymes:Dutch/ɑf


text:
Xenaphile

Noun

 * 1)  A fan of the television series .

title: Xenaphile


text: Xenaphiles

title: Xenaphiles


text:
Rhymes:Dutch/ɑfs

One syllable

 * lafs
 * mafs
 * strafs

title: Rhymes:Dutch/ɑfs


text: artics

title: artics


text:
Rhymes:Dutch/ɑfst

One syllable

 * lafst
 * mafst
 * strafst

title: Rhymes:Dutch/ɑfst


text:
رویایی

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) dreamy

title: رویایی


text: Rhymes:Dutch/ɑft

title: Rhymes:Dutch/ɑft


text:
Talk:XR9576

What numbering system does this belong to? Equinox ◑ 21:05, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
 * It is very difficult to say. But I think it might be an internal numbering system of potential drugs being investigated by a company called Xenova in Camridge. They do not appear to have a website! SemperBlotto 21:24, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:XR9576


text:
Zetlander

Noun

 * 1) A native or inhabitant of Zetland.

title: Zetlander


text: Zetlanders

title: Zetlanders


text:
جدایی

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) separation
 * 2) divorce

title: جدایی


text: joygasms

title: joygasms


text:
măciucă

Etymology
. Cognate to 🇨🇬. Often considered to be from the root, itself from  or  + a suffix , of possibly Gallic origin (compare 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, , 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, , 🇨🇬), or an expressive creation based on the root. Compare also 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬. The first element may derive ultimately from.

Alternatively from Vulgar Latin, itself from.

Noun

 * 1) club, bludgeon
 * 2)  penis

title: măciucă


text: hCG

title: hCG


text:
User talk:Kalap ur

construal
See WT:TR. DCDuring TALK 21:20, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kalap ur


text:
Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2011-08/Romanization of languages in ancient scripts

Romanization of languages in ancient scripts

 * Voting on: If an ancient, no longer living language was written in a script that is now no longer used or widely understood, and it was not represented in another script that still is used or widely understood, then romanizations of its words will be allowed entries. For example, qino, a romanization of the Gothic word 𐌵𐌹𐌽𐍉, will be allowed.

 * Rationale: Many old languages on Wiktionary were written in scripts that are no longer common and the texts in which they appear are more commonly published in romanized form than in the original script. Although the original script was the only script used in contemporary attestations, modern readers will almost exclusively read texts in that language in Latin script. Grammars and dictionaries are written in Latin script as well, and this is the script that people will most likely want to look up words in. So allowing users to look up the terms in Latin script would have far more practical value for users than the original script ever will. The exception is for languages using defunct scripts that were also written in another script which is still in use. An example is Old Church Slavonic (Glagolitic is defunct, but Cyrillic is not), which would not be affected by this vote.

 * Vote starts: 00:01, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Vote ends: 23.59, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

 * Vote created: —CodeCat 21:33, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Discussion:
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] WT:BP
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2011-08/Romanization of languages in ancient scripts
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] Beer parlour archive/2011/March

Support

 * 1) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support - -sche (discuss) 21:03, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support —Stephen (Talk) 22:23, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support —CodeCat 23:35, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support, I think. At least, I certainly support for Gothic, because Gothic works are apparently actually published in romanization. Hopefully I support for whatever other languages would be covered by this. :-P   —Ruakh TALK 02:48, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
 * There's a list on the talk page, but beware! it has example entries, and that many strange scripts in one place crashes Firefox, for me. (All the more reason to allow romanisations...) - -sche (discuss) 03:46, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support only for Gothic. —Ruakh TALK 21:16, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support MaEr 16:52, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support Jamesjiao → T ◊ C 00:34, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support --Anatoli 00:37, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support H. (talk) 09:13, 9 September 2011 (UTC) I’m sure the necessary details will be worked out at due time.

Oppose

 * 1) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose , due to the vote being imprecise about what romanizations specifically are allowed, which opens the door to abuse. -- Liliana • 05:02, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
 * As I said on the talk page, while that's true I expect it to remain hypothetical. I can't imagine editors making up phoney romanizations, and if they did, we wouldn't stand for it no matter what this vote says. Mglovesfun (talk) 09:36, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose   —  [Ric Laurent] — 18:41, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] I'm not all that happy about including transliterations anyway. (They are findable by search.) But especially without a list, in the vote, of languages and scripts to which this apply, I have to oppose. —msh210℠ (talk) 20:20, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose except for Gothic. —Ruakh TALK 21:16, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Abstain

 * 1) [[Image:Symbol abstain vote.svg|20px]] Abstain Mglovesfun (talk) 09:35, 9 September 2011 (UTC). I've always opposed the romanization of non-Latin scripts as full main namespace entries. However this seems to be the situation where it's the most acceptable and most beneficial, also since it wouldn't affect any languages I edit, I abstain. Mglovesfun (talk) 09:35, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Decision
I'm not sure what the decision is. Ruakh vote seems to be the deciding point now, with his oppose vote it makes it fail 7-4, but for Gothic it passes 8-3? —CodeCat 17:05, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

 * Heh, sorry to cause complications. I'm not used to actually being a deciding vote. :-P  Are people O.K. with passing this only for Gothic? —Ruakh TALK 17:59, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Fine by me. That seems to be the correct decision. —msh210℠ (talk) 21:18, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

 * Why is the Gothic case different from that of Sumerian? If Gothic is to be separated from the herd, it needs another discussion and vote. —Stephen (Talk) 02:36, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

 * For me, the reasons that Gothic is different from all other languages, including Sumerian, were:
 * stated, credibly, that works are commonly published in Gothic in romanization, whereas no such statement was made for any specific other language.
 * The vote only mentions Gothic, and several editors expressed concerns about a vote that applies to members of a broad and potentially vague class of languages rather than to members of a specific list.
 * I feel that, in general, the community should let editors for each language figure out how best to handle coverage of that language. In the case of Gothic, herself seems to be one of the most interested editors; she's seeking community support for her own desired approach. In the case of all other potentially-affected languages, I think  may be seeking premature consistency (in the form of applying her preferred Gothic norms to all those other languages that she doesn't edit in).
 * But yeah, you may be right that it needs another discussion and vote, since support for this proposal does not necessarily entail support for an identical-except-only-for-Gothic proposal. :-/
 * —Ruakh TALK 03:25, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

 * I noted on the talk page before starting the vote that "if the proposal fails because users would rather vote on a list of languages or scripts than a rule, we can create another vote. (Vidēte how many votes have been held on attestation in extinct languages.)" We can easily create two votes, one to allow the full list, including Gothic, and one to allow Gothic. - -sche (discuss) 03:40, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Here's a full-list vote: Votes/pl-2011-09/Romanization of languages in ancient scripts 2. - -sche (discuss) 04:02, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

 * A second vote is fine for me, too. I feel more comfortable with voting on a list of languages, or even better, voting on a single language, like Gothic. --MaEr 17:59, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

I'm gonna mark this as failed so as to avoid an eventual conflict with the results of Votes/pl-2011-09/Romanization of languages in ancient scripts 2 and Votes/pl-2011-10/Romanization of Gothic. Mglovesfun (talk) 16:29, 7 October 2011 (UTC)


text: 沟通

title: 沟通


text:
溝通

Verb

 * 1) to communicate
 * 2)  to connect irrigation channels

title: 溝通


text:
mehe

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) skinny
 * 2) thin

title: mehe


text:
éischt

Adjective

 * 1)  first

title: éischt


text:
Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2011-08/Romanization of languages in ancient scripts

Vagueness
I find "ancient language was written in a script that is now no longer used or widely understood" to be too vague; define 'ancient', 'no longer used' and '[no longer] widely understood' and it should be ok. --Mglovesfun (talk) 21:51, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I agree that it is vague, and suggest listing the affected languages. (I imagine we can make an exhaustive list. If that is not desirable, we should still list some languages as examples.) - -sche (discuss) 22:21, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Gothic, Hittite, Hurrian (and Akkadian, Eblaite, Sumerian, and Urartian), Luwian, Egyptian, Old Persian, Lydian, Lycian, Mycenaean Greek(?), Minoan, Ammonite, Edomite, Moabite, Punic, Phoenician, Median, Sentinelese . (Languages written in Mayan script?) - -sche (discuss) 22:34, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
 * How can Sentinelese be an example? Barely anything at all is known about it, let alone writing... And it's also a living language. —CodeCat 22:47, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Ah, my mistake, I've struck it. I just went through the categories trying to find all of the languages written in unused scripts. - -sche (discuss) 23:32, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

 * Nevertheless, in my opinion it's easier to vote on a language or on a list of languages than on the wording of some rule. Therefore I agree with User:-sche. --MaEr 17:41, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

Why not a list of scripts? Wouldn't that work? -- Liliana • 17:47, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

 * Right. Script would be more correct than language. --MaEr 16:42, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

I would be OK with this vote starting as-written (as it stands now, a good rule formulated in such a way that it can encompass newly-discovered languages/scripts, like Median, in a way an enumeration of languages or scripts would not). I would also be OK with someone adding language to it specifying which languages or scripts would be affected. (For example, something along the lines of "To wit, the following languages will be affected: Akkadian, Ammonite, Carian, Eblaite, Edomite, Egyptian, Gothic, Hittite, Hurian, Luwian, Lydian, Moabite, Old Persian, Phoenician, Punic, Sumerian, Urartian." or "Languages written in the following scripts (and not in other, still-used scripts) will be affected: Anatolian hieroglyphs, Carian, cuneiform, Egyptian hieroglyphs, Gothic, Lydian, Maya glyphs, Old Persian cuneiform, Phoenician, Urartian cuneiform.") Shall we start the vote as scheduled? Does anyone feel strongly enough that languages/scripts should be specified to add a sentence(s) specifying them to the vote before starting it? - -sche (discuss) 04:34, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

 * I think I'm going to support the proposal as it is written now. If you think that the current wording is precise enough, we could give it a chance, with or without any embedded list. --MaEr 08:03, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

 * Let's start the vote as written; if the proposal fails because users would rather vote on a list of languages or scripts than a rule, we can create another vote. (Vidēte how many votes have been held on attestation in extinct languages.) - -sche (discuss) 17:17, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

List of languages
Here is a list (possibly incomplete or faulty, please make additions and corrections as necessary) of affected languages, followed by examples of words in the original script, and possible romanisations. I would like to make clear that different romanisations may be preferred; I am indifferent to the romanisation used. - -sche (discuss) 19:34, 11 August 2011 (UTC) Here is a list of languages which might be affected, or which might be (already / better) written in Greek: I included these languages in my initial list, but have not included them above: - -sche (discuss) 19:34, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Akkadian (written in cuneiform: 𒆍𒃲 ... abullu?)
 * 2) Ammonite (written in the Phoenician script: 𐤁𐤍, bn)
 * 3) Carian (written in Carian script: 𐊲𐊼, uk)
 * 4) Eblaite (written in cuneiform: 𒋛𒈾𒌈 ... either si-na-tum or sinatum)
 * 5) Edomite (written in a Canaanite or Phoenician script: 𐤀𐤁, 'b)
 * 6) Egyptian (written in Egyptian hieroglyphs: 𓈗𓏤, mw)
 * 7) Gothic (written in the Gothic script: 𐌰𐌱𐌰, aba; 𐌵𐌹𐌽𐍉, qino)
 * 8) Hittite (written in cuneiform: 𒀀𒀸𒅆𒄿𒀀𒋻, assiyatar)
 * 9) Hurrian (written in a cuneiform script: 𒊺𒂊𒈾 ... šena?)
 * 10) Luwian (written in cuneiform and in Anatolian hieroglyphs: 𒈾𒀀𒉡𒌦, nanun)
 * 11) Lydian (written in the Lydian script: 𐤠𐤠𐤭𐤠, aara)
 * 12) Moabite (written in the Phoenician script: 𐤁𐤍, bn)
 * 13) Old Persian (written in Old Persian cuneiform: 𐎠𐎿, asa)
 * 14) Phoenician (written in the Phoenician script: 𐤁𐤉𐤍, byn)
 * 15) Punic (written in the Phoenician script: 𐤁𐤉𐤍, byn)
 * 16) Sumerian (written in cuneiform: 𒉎 ... ni?)
 * 17) Urartian (written in Urartian cuneiform and in Anatolian hieroglyphs: we have no entries yet)
 * 1) Lycian (written in the Lycian script — an extension of Greek: an entry is 𐊍𐊀𐊅𐊀)
 * 2) Mycenaean Greek (written in Linear B — a predecessor of Greek: an entry is 𐀆𐀆𐀕𐀙)
 * 1) Ch'olti' (written in Maya[n] script, also known as Maya[n] glyphs and Maya[n] hieroglyphs), because we have only Category:Ch'orti' language, and as far as I can tell, we have no Maya[n] script entries)
 * 2) Median (also known as Medean and Medic), because it is not preserved, and its script is unknown (in spite of which, we have one Median entry, in the Greek script, σπάκα)
 * 3) Minoan, because it is written in Linear A, an undeciphered script (in spite of which, we have one entry, in the Latin script: kuro)

List of scripts
This list is possibly incomplete: Possibly also:
 * 1) Anatolian hieroglyphs
 * 2) Carian
 * 3) cuneiform
 * 4) Egyptian hieroglyphs
 * 5) Gothic
 * 6) Lydian
 * 7) Maya glyphs
 * 8) Old Persian cuneiform
 * 9) Phoenician
 * 10) Urartian cuneiform
 * 1) Lycian
 * 2) Linear B
 * 3) Linear A (when deciphered!)

What will the Romanized entry be?
We should work out what (to propose in the vote that) the Romanization-entries will be: the main hosts of content (the places where the words are defined, with the original-script entries being turned into soft redirects of sorts), co-hosts of content (this strikes me as a terrible idea bound to result in entries becoming out-of-sync, but a counter-argument is that this seems to be how we handle romaji), or soft-redirects of sorts to the original-script entries. I prefer the third idea (Romanized entries as soft redirects), but would also support the first idea (Romanized entries as the main entries). I feel the vote should specifically propose one or the other, rather than simply saying Romanized entries will be allowed. - -sche (discuss) 22:21, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Using the romanized entries as the main entry would be more work because currently what we have is at the native script entry. We would have to move them then. —CodeCat 22:29, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
 * It doe say " then romanizations of its words will be allowed entries." It doesn't say what those romanizations should be. I do feel a bit uneasy about that, it seems to me at least possible to exploit that, but I can't imagine anyone actually doing it. Also, a sensible administrator will shoot any 'jokey romanizations' on sight. Mglovesfun (talk) 23:19, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Standardized romanization?
Languages such as Old Norse are often represented in a standardised spelling that are closer to modern languages, usually by replacing certain letters or combinations with others. But this was not the spelling of the original manuscript. For example Old Norse manuscripts used i instead of j and used c instead of k. This is not in the scope of the vote, but since replacing letters is a small form of transliteration, maybe it should be, for the same reasons? —CodeCat 22:57, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I think the normalisation of Old Norse is a separate matter. For one thing, the change from c to k is not a change in alphabet. - -sche (discuss) 23:35, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Maybe not, but in both cases we're deviating from the representation found in the original writing. —CodeCat 23:46, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
 * See also Talk:aprés, Old French, Anglo-Norman and I think too Middle French don't use diacritics apart from diareses (rare) and cedillas (rare) but seemingly ALL online versions as well as text book versions use diacritics, chiefly the acute accent for past tenses and and occasion where the final e ought to be for rhyming purposes. Wikimedia Commons does provide some original manuscripts in these languages, though my eye sight not to mention reading skills aren't really up to it. Having said all of this, I do agree that it's a separate issue; the title of the vote is romanization  not modernization  --Mglovesfun (talk) 19:38, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Why only Latin/Roman
Are all scholarly texts written in Roman script? Are there no Russian or Chinese linguists? The lack of mention in the vote almost makes me want to oppose. DAVilla 22:10, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, the English Wiktionary is aimed at people who speak English. Since English only uses the Latin script, it is assumed that all readers can use the Latin script; it is not assumed that they can use any other script. Let's put it this way, I wouldn't be complaining about the lack of Latin script entries for translitered Sumerian on the Russian and Arabic Wiktionaries. Mglovesfun (talk) 23:15, 27 August 2011 (UTC)


text: gōutōng

title: gōutōng


text:
勾通

Verb

 * 1) to conspire with; to collude with

title: 勾通


text:
Wiktionary:Word of the day/Nominations/Archive 2011

December 2011

 * — Pingkudimmi 07:46, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Celloplayer115 23:53, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * --Simplus2 17:44, 30 December 2011 (UTC) was previously WOTD
 * --Simplus2 17:44, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * --Simplus2 17:44, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * --Simplus2 17:44, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * --Simplus2 17:44, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * --Simplus2 17:44, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * --Simplus2 17:44, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * --Simplus2 17:44, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * --Simplus2 17:44, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * --Simplus2 17:44, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * --Simplus2 17:44, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * --Simplus2 17:44, 30 December 2011 (UTC) was wotd
 * --Simplus2 17:44, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * --Simplus2 17:44, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * --Simplus2 17:44, 30 December 2011 (UTC) was wotd
 * --Simplus2 17:44, 30 December 2011 (UTC) was wotd
 * --Simplus2 17:44, 30 December 2011 (UTC) Latin form-of entry
 * --Simplus2 17:44, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * --Simplus2 17:44, 30 December 2011 (UTC) was wotd
 * --Simplus2 17:44, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * --Simplus2 17:44, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * --Simplus2 17:44, 30 December 2011 (UTC) NYT WOTD
 * --Simplus2 17:44, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * --Simplus2 17:44, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * --Simplus2 17:44, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * This falls under "no offensive words". —Internoob 03:56, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
 * --Simplus2 17:44, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * --Simplus2 17:44, 30 December 2011 (UTC) was wotd
 * --Simplus2 17:44, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * --Simplus2 17:44, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * --Simplus2 17:44, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * --Simplus2 17:44, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * --Simplus2 17:44, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * --Simplus2 17:33, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * 123sarangi 14:17, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Celloplayer115 21:42, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * --EncycloPetey 22:40, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
 * --Simplus2 22:34, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
 * --EncycloPetey 17:25, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
 * -- A LGRIF  talk 13:03, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
 * —Internoob 23:33, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
 * --EncycloPetey 21:06, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
 * --EncycloPetey 21:02, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
 * --Daniel 19:03, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
 * --EncycloPetey 04:20, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
 * --EncycloPetey 04:20, 16 December 2011 (UTC) M-W
 * --EncycloPetey 04:20, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
 * --EncycloPetey 04:20, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
 * —Internoob 05:17, 14 December 2011 (UTC) Dictionary.com
 * —Internoob 05:00, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
 * --EncycloPetey 03:35, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * —Internoob 02:32, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 01:18, 13 December 2011 (UTC) Dictionary.com's WOTD
 * —Internoob 03:48, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Equinox ◑ 01:10, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
 * —Internoob 01:08, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
 * ety 2 —Internoob 01:08, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
 * —Internoob 01:08, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
 * -- A LGRIF  talk 10:01, 9 December 2011 (UTC)  contemn was WOTD
 * --EncycloPetey 16:51, 8 December 2011 (UTC) M-W WOTD  :(
 * —Internoob 01:09, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Equinox ◑ 22:44, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
 * dcljr 03:52, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
 * dcljr 03:52, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
 * --EncycloPetey 01:36, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
 * dcljr 01:25, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
 * dcljr 01:25, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
 * dcljr 01:25, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
 * dcljr 01:25, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
 * dcljr 23:45, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
 * or, perhaps, dcljr 23:40, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Hard to believe this hasn't even been nominated before (AFAICT). dcljr 23:25, 1 December 2011 (UTC) Good one, but it was Merriam-Webster's WOTD
 * (the idiomatic sense) dcljr 23:15, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
 * --EncycloPetey 04:58, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Too many one-or-two-term definitions, IMO. —Internoob 01:12, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
 * —Internoob 01:12, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
 * --EncycloPetey 04:58, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
 * --EncycloPetey 04:58, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

November 2011

 * Beetlejuicex3 23:10, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
 * --EncycloPetey 05:28, 29 November 2011 (UTC) Good one. It made me think of someone. :) —Internoob 01:12, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
 * --EncycloPetey 05:28, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
 * --EncycloPetey 05:28, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
 * --EncycloPetey 05:28, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
 * --EncycloPetey 05:28, 29 November 2011 (UTC) already was WOTD
 * —Beetlejuicex3 20:44, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * -- A LGRIF  talk 15:34, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * —Wham Bam Rock II 16:08:41 27 Nov. 2011 (PST) already was WOTD
 * —Internoob 00:50, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
 * --Pilcrow 04:00, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
 * --EncycloPetey 04:17, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
 * --EncycloPetey 04:24, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
 * --EncycloPetey 04:09, 17 November 2011 (UTC) Dictionary.com's WOTD
 * --EncycloPetey 04:09, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I had to RFC it. —Internoob 00:59, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
 * --Pilcrow 20:58, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
 * --Pilcrow 20:58, 14 November 2011 (UTC) Dictionary.com's WOTD
 * --EncycloPetey 00:53, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
 * —Internoob 22:25, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
 * --EncycloPetey 17:11, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
 * George2001hi 16:21, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
 * George2001hi 16:21, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
 * George2001hi 23:35, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
 * --EncycloPetey 03:27, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
 * George2001hi 19:38, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
 * --Pilcrow 16:07, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
 * — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 15:54, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
 * —Internoob 21:38, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
 * —Internoob 21:33, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

October 2011

 * --EncycloPetey 16:01, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
 * --EncycloPetey 16:01, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
 * --Rockpilot 21:30, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
 * --Rockpilot 21:30, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
 * --Rockpilot 21:30, 23 October 2011 (UTC) already was WOTD
 * --Rockpilot 21:30, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
 * --Rockpilot 21:30, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
 * --Rockpilot 21:30, 23 October 2011 (UTC) already was WOTD
 * --Rockpilot 21:30, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
 * --Rockpilot 21:30, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
 * --Rockpilot 21:30, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
 * --Rockpilot 21:30, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
 * --Rockpilot 21:30, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
 * --Rockpilot 21:30, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
 * --Rockpilot 21:30, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
 * --Rockpilot 21:30, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
 * --Rockpilot 21:30, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
 * --EncycloPetey 16:50, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
 * --EncycloPetey 16:50, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
 * --Rockpilot 21:29, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
 * --Rockpilot 21:29, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
 * --Rockpilot 21:29, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
 * --Daniel 12:26, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
 * - Jredmond 16:40, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
 * — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 21:20, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
 * --Pilcrow 01:23, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
 * < class="latinx" >Ƿidsiþ 14:01, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Albacore 13:58, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
 * --EncycloPetey 23:24, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
 * --Pilcrow 04:05, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
 * — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 10:51, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
 * --EncycloPetey 03:24, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
 * --EncycloPetey 03:13, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
 * --EncycloPetey 03:49, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
 * --EncycloPetey 18:48, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
 * --EncycloPetey 18:28, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
 * — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 21:55, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
 * --Rockpilot 21:58, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
 * --Rockpilot 09:23, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

September 2011

 * < class="latinx" >Ƿidsiþ 06:56, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
 * --Daniel 21:04, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Rockpilot 20:48, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
 * --Vahag 20:45, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
 * --Pilcrow 04:51, 28 September 2011 (UTC) (29 Sept)
 * — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 20:39, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
 * sewnmouthsecret 03:15, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
 * sewnmouthsecret 03:15, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
 * --EncycloPetey 23:08, 21 September 2011 (UTC) (27 September)
 * --The Evil IP address 10:53, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
 * —Ruakh TALK 20:32, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
 * —Ruakh TALK 20:28, 16 September 2011 (UTC) (22 September)
 * —Ruakh TALK 20:28, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
 * —Ruakh TALK 20:28, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
 * —Ruakh TALK 13:32, 16 September 2011 (UTC) (24 September)
 * —Ruakh TALK 06:15, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
 * — Pingkudimmi 15:19, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
 * —Ruakh TALK 01:35, 13 September 2011 (UTC) (25 September)
 * —Ruakh TALK 00:53, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
 * —Ruakh TALK 00:53, 13 September 2011 (UTC) (26 September)
 * —Ruakh TALK 00:53, 13 September 2011 (UTC) (23 September)
 * --The Evil IP address 10:38, 12 September 2011 (UTC) M-W WOTD
 * --Daniel 09:48, 12 September 2011 (UTC) (28 September)
 * by  An  editor since 8.28.2011.  17:34, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
 * by  An  editor since 8.28.2011.  17:28, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

August 2011

 * --Daniel 04:44, 31 August 2011 (UTC) (September 12)
 * --Daniel 23:41, 30 August 2011 (UTC) (was already WOTD)
 * - -sche (discuss) 08:47, 28 August 2011 (UTC), für eine friend (will appear on the 5th of October)
 * - -sche (discuss) 08:06, 28 August 2011 (UTC) (will appear on the 1st of October)
 * Ferþu Hal! 23:57, 27 August 2011 (UTC) (will appear on the 4th of September)
 * --Pilcrow 18:50, 25 August 2011 (UTC) (will appear on the 3rd of September)
 * -- A LGRIF  talk 13:10, 24 August 2011 (UTC) (13 September 2011)
 * --EncycloPetey 06:14, 20 August 2011 (UTC) (will appear on the 7th of October)
 * --EncycloPetey 05:52, 20 August 2011 (UTC) (will appear on the 4th of October)
 * -NorthPark420 - User:NorthPark420 A great word that could be used everyday.
 * Too nearly obsolete, I think. Google News Archive shows only eight hits since 2000, of which only three seem to be actual uses by actual native speakers. —Ruakh TALK 05:42, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
 * — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 12:30, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
 * -- ---> Tooironic 01:35, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
 * --EncycloPetey 00:37, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
 * --EncycloPetey 23:52, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
 * --EncycloPetey 22:09, 7 August 2011 (UTC) (will appear on the 8th of September)
 * -- A LGRIF  talk 13:09, 7 August 2011 (UTC) (will appear on the 6th of September)
 * -- A LGRIF  talk 13:05, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
 * -- A LGRIF  talk 13:03, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
 * -- A LGRIF  talk 13:01, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
 * --Daniel 04:08, 5 August 2011 (UTC) (will appear on the 2nd of October)
 * — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 10:01, 2 August 2011 (UTC) (6 October)

July 2011

 * --EncycloPetey 06:18, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
 * — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 22:05, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
 * --EncycloPetey 22:02, 27 July 2011 (UTC) (9 September 2011)
 * --Luosiji 14:41, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
 * or obesogen: DCDuring TALK 14:35, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
 * — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 13:11, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 14:00, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
 * — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 12:10, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
 * --EncycloPetey 19:03, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
 * — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 20:22, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
 * -- A LGRIF  talk 09:49, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
 * — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 16:27, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
 * -- A LGRIF  talk 13:12, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
 * --Daniel 11:00, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
 * --EncycloPetey 19:25, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
 * -- A LGRIF  talk 17:43, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
 * --EncycloPetey 14:57, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
 * -- A LGRIF  talk 13:05, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

June 2011

 * --Daniel 03:50, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
 * — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 22:36, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
 * --Pilcrow 05:38, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
 * (compare / contrast with peaceful)-- A LGRIF  talk 12:05, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
 * --Daniel 21:57, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
 * --Teju2friends 09:30, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * --Daniel 02:15, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * George2001hi 11:54, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * --Daniel 00:36, 5 June 2011 (UTC) I'm using handwaving instead. < class="latinx" >Ƿidsiþ</> 15:59, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
 * --Daniel 00:36, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * --Daniel 15:58, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * --Daniel 04:49, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * per talk —Ruakh TALK 11:24, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

May 2011

 * Daniel. 01:34, 22 May 2011 (UTC) (will appear on the 5th of September)
 * TeleComNasSprVen 04:38, 13 May 2011 (UTC) (10 September 2011)
 * Null-null-drei 18:26, 11 May 2011 (UTC) doesn't exist
 * TeleComNasSprVen 07:40, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * TeleComNasSprVen 07:40, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * TeleComNasSprVen 07:40, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Daniel. 18:28, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Aquadelusion 07:18, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * TeleComNasSprVen 09:16, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
 * TeleComNasSprVen 09:14, 6 May 2011 (UTC) Already had it back in 08
 * Daniel. 04:03, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
 * VZakharov 16:26, 5 May 2011 (UTC) surreptitiously was WOTD
 * -- A LGRIF  talk 09:21, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
 * -- A LGRIF  talk 09:49, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
 * VZakharov 00:02, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

April 2011

 * Daniel. 17:00, 30 April 2011 (UTC) was wotd 2007 July5
 * VZakharov 14:35, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
 * George2001hi 16:56, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
 * George2001hi 15:32, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
 * George 2001hi  (Discussion)   21:55, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Xerxes b 15:15, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Daniel. 11:59, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Daniel. 15:53, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Daniel. 15:53, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Daniel. 15:53, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Daniel. 15:53, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
 * -- A LGRIF  talk 12:51, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Daniel. 08:10, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Daniel. 23:16, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Daniel. 00:36, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Daniel. 00:35, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Daniel. 22:50, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Daniel. 22:50, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Daniel. 22:46, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Daniel. 21:12, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Daniel. 21:04, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Daniel. 13:45, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Daniel. 13:45, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Daniel. 13:45, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Daniel. 13:45, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Daniel. 13:45, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Daniel. 13:45, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Daniel. 13:45, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Daniel. 13:42, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Daniel. 13:42, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Daniel. 13:42, 13 April 2011 (UTC) I went with "infanticide" instead. —Ruakh TALK 15:16, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Daniel. 13:41, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Daniel. 13:40, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Daniel. 13:39, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Daniel. 13:39, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Daniel. 13:38, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Daniel. 13:37, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Daniel. 13:37, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Daniel. 13:37, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * —Nils von Barth (nbarth) (talk) 13:54, 12 April 2011 (UTC) (Noticed it in this poem: Some General Instructions, by ; searching shows it as having been featured as WOTD at M-W, but it seems interesting enough in its own right.) (A bit surprising that it has not been featured at HotForWords yet.)
 * Arfomeep 00:46, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
 * -- A LGRIF  talk 15:04, 1 April 2011 (UTC) (7 Sept 2011)

March 2011

 * — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 19:37, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 19:22, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Daniel. 08:31, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 17:33, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
 * — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 16:23, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
 * -- A LGRIF  talk 12:48, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
 * A LGRIF  talk 12:46, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
 * -- A LGRIF  talk 12:45, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
 * — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 17:14, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
 * -- A LGRIF  talk 10:25, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Daniel. 02:41, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
 * --Daniel. 01:34, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Gauss 22:06, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 19:18, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 19:18, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 19:18, 7 March 2011 (UTC) - already was WOTD
 * The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 19:18, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 19:18, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 19:18, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
 * — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 17:46, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

February 2011

 * < class="latinx" >Ƿidsiþ</> 09:07, 27 February 2011 (UTC) used
 * GreenGenie 06:38, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
 * GreenGenie 06:36, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
 * -- A LGRIF  talk 14:17, 24 February 2011 (UTC) used
 * — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 14:17, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
 * < class="latinx" >Ƿidsiþ</> 10:45, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
 * -- A LGRIF  talk 12:05, 14 February 2011 (UTC) (2011 September 14)
 * -- A LGRIF  talk 16:55, 10 February 2011 (UTC) used
 * (because it is commonly mis-spelt) -- A LGRIF  talk 09:46, 10 February 2011 (UTC) used
 * Devyfan 19:27, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Devyfan 19:27, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Devyfan 19:27, 8 February 2011 (UTC) used
 * Devyfan 19:27, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Devyfan 19:27, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
 * -- A LGRIF  talk 09:53, 5 February 2011 (UTC) used
 * -- A LGRIF  talk 09:56, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Daniel. 08:41, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Daniel. 08:41, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

January 2011

 * — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 18:05, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
 * - A LGRIF  talk 13:02, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Doggitydogs 00:39, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This hasn't been added yet; it is, however, listed at the missing words list... it is an adjective meaning having hermit-like qualities.
 * Doggitydogs 00:39, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
 * —Internoob (Disc•Cont) 04:48, 10 January 2011 (UTC)


text:
Talk:verheiratet

This means married! I believe it also a conjugation of a the verb verhieraten. 174.62.207.65 22:28, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes. It already says 'married' in the entry, and surely you meant verheiraten? Like most transitive Germanic verbs, their past participle forms can be used as a passive adjective such as this one (and note that its English translation also works in the same way). Jamesjiao → T ◊ C 22:39, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:verheiratet


text:
drëtt

Etymology
From. Cognate with 🇨🇬.

Adjective

 * 1)  third

title: drëtt


text:
véiert

Adjective

 * 1)  fourth

title: véiert


text:
worshipability

Noun

 * 1) Capability of being worshiped; worthiness of veneration.

title: worshipability


text:
fënneft

Adjective

 * 1)  fifth

title: fënneft


text:
sechst

Adjective

 * 1)  sixth

title: sechst


text:
Geburtsort

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) birthplace, place of birth

title: Geburtsort


text:
siwent

Adjective

 * 1)  seventh

title: siwent


text: dog-and-pony show

title: dog-and-pony show


text:
néngt

Adjective

 * 1)  ninth

title: néngt


text: domesday

title: domesday


text: peniste

title: peniste


text: penisten

title: penisten


text: penisleri

title: penisleri


text: penislerde

title: penislerde


text: penislere

title: penislere


text: penislerden

title: penislerden


text: penislerin

title: penislerin


text: Doomsday Book

title: Doomsday Book


text:
zéngt

Adjective

 * 1)  tenth

title: zéngt


text: drag strip

title: drag strip


text:
befight

Etymology
From, from , equivalent to. Cognate with 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1)  To deprive of by fighting.
 * 2)  To fight against; contend; do battle with.

title: befight


text:
befoam

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  To spatter or cover with foam.

title: befoam


text:
colibă

Etymology
Related words appear in all Balkan languages. Probably from, possibly through a language intermediary (Serbian, Bulgarian ), compare also 🇨🇬, and Turkish borrowing. Relation to Persian unclear. Another somewhat less likely theory suggests the other Balkan language cognates may have originally come from an old Romanian word and that it may be derived from Latin, from. For the uncommon sound shift from g > b, see, , , etc.

Noun

 * 1) hut, shack, hovel, lodge, cabin

title: colibă


text:
befly

Etymology
From, from , equivalent. Cognate with 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1)  To fly about; fly from; shun; escape.

title: befly


text:
User talk:Ljettinger

CONOPS
This is not what a dictionary definition should look like. Please follow the model of other entries. DCDuring TALK 23:44, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ljettinger


text:
User talk:Wikijoseph~enwiktionary

Nazgul
Please note that this is not Wikipedia. You are currently on Wiktionary, a dictionary web site. If you would like to add a word and its definition, then you are welcome to do so. Encyclopedic articles, such as the one you entered, belong on an encyclopedia web site, such as Wikipedia. Thanks. --EncycloPetey 23:46, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Wikijoseph. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Wikijoseph~enwiktionary that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 00:12, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 07:35, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Wikijoseph~enwiktionary


text: Category:Korean phrasebook/Communication


text:
Talk:inneil-GhPS

RFV
(Scottish Gaelic.) Does this exist attestably in writing? Equinox ◑ 23:04, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
 * RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 20:00, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:inneil-GhPS


text:
Talk:clemency

RFV
Rfv-sense: "The moderation of the severity of a punishment"; and "forgiveness or compassion". I think these are badly-written attempts to define sense 1 (which I just added), and should be merged thereinto. < class="latinx" >Ƿidsiþ 09:53, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I have rfv-failed / merged the senses as suggested. - -sche (discuss) 20:05, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:clemency


text:
beflee

Etymology
From, , from , equivalent to.

Verb

 * 1)  To flee from; flee; avoid; shun.

title: beflee


text:
Talk:biographette

RFV
A few Google hits but can this really be cited? -- Gauss 07:07, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The word has been in use for over a hundred years, so I would say so. --Victar 07:58, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Citations added. --Victar 08:52, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Added where? I just see references. --Mglovesfun (talk) 09:45, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Meant to say references. --Victar 13:05, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I converted them now to quoted citations. --Victar 13:50, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Looks good. --Mglovesfun (talk) 10:01, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes. -- Gauss 20:31, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Passed RFV. Equinox ◑ 09:54, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:biographette


text:
Talk:triptrotting

triptrotter
These appear to be spam and/or protologisms, and the definition for triptrotting makes it sound like a brand name or Web site name. Equinox ◑ 22:43, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I was just going to delete them. SemperBlotto 06:56, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedied. Equinox ◑ 00:21, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:triptrotting


text:
Talk:triptrotter

RFV
See the RFV/deletion discussion on Talk:triptrotting. - -sche (discuss) 01:51, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:triptrotter


text:
Talk:give face

Quotation
I am not sure which meaning of "give face" this sentence uses: J. Darroll Hall, The Lollipop Book, page 107: Boys gave face, girls gave head. - -sche (discuss) 02:07, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * We don't have the sense of give face or face that would be involved. I'm sure that the other side of "giving" face is "getting" face, so "face" should have its own meaning. Whether is is more or less than "cunnilingus" or a synonym, however, I don't know. DCDuring TALK 03:22, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Ah, I wasn't sure if it was a (missing) sexual sense, or an existing sense, given that it could also make sense as "boys were combative"—(our sense 2)—"and girls were sexual". - -sche (discuss) 04:30, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

 * Alright, here are two more quotations, making three. Should we add a sense-line? We do have [[give head]]. - -sche (discuss) 04:40, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

 * 1) * 2004, Henry Joseph Rychlicki, Fragments of My Life: A Sex Fiction, page 121:
 * I'd hold her ass while I was giving her face, licking and sucking while she tried to escape, anticipating her orgasm when all of the sudden she would burst sweet honey and come all over my face while the earth shook.
 * 1) * 2001, Letters to Penthouse XIV, page 107:
 * Frank had pushed her pants down to reveal her pink pussy and was giving her face. She was in ecstasy.
 * "get face" is uncommon at Books (one cite), hard to find at Groups (I gave up.), so give face seems like the right home for this, though it implies less flexibility is usage than seems likely to me. DCDuring TALK 12:30, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

RFV
Rfv-sense: "To honor; to pay respect." Related to save face. In use? Context? DCDuring TALK 18:07, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

 * I'm a bit confused by the request, since a skim-through of shows many more uses in this sense than in the other. The context seems to be "when talking about Chinese people and culture" (because everyone knows that we Americans love it when people embarrass us?). —Ruakh TALK 02:22, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I stumbled across the entry because I stumbled across the Ety 2 sense (which I also had never heard of, while trying to cite downtalk, as best I can remember. I'd never heard give face in the Ety 1 sense and it seemed fanciful, though plausible. It wasn't in OneLook or my Dictionary of American Idioms and Phrasal Verbs. I RfV things like that in case I forget to come back to them (as I did). In my wanderings through English entries I find many more problems than I can solve, which is why I keep on hoping that we can get more English-language contributors.
 * If there isn't a context suitable for, then any quotes illustrating typical usage would be great.
 * I think there is also a collocation/idiom "to give (a) face to" meaning something like personify, embody, or represent. Did you come across anything like that? DCDuring TALK 14:52, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Ah, that makes sense, thanks. (I thought there might have been something more specific that you were doubting, but I couldn't figure out what. Hence my confusion.) —Ruakh TALK 15:17, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I have looked at quite a few bgc pages and wonder whether give face, save face, and lose face haven't become NISoP. The Chinese concept of "face" itself seems to have been substantially absorbed into English. That might have been underlying my RfV. This development seems to me to have occurred mostly in the last 20 years, possibly less. DCDuring TALK 01:12, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
 * If it has become NISOP, but wasn't originally, it would seem to pass the in a jiffy test. - -sche (discuss) 16:22, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

 * Cited. Should pass as attested, and per the in a jiffy test. - -sche (discuss) 02:11, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * So passed. - -sche (discuss) 07:38, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:give face


text:
Citations:tocome

Verb

 * 1)  To come to; approach.
 * 2) *1490, William Caxton, Eneydos:
 * [...] my tocoming natural and sovereign lord [...]
 * 1) *1574, H.N., Psalmes and Songes:
 * [...] makinge manifest euenso vnto hym the new-daye of the Loue that kingdome of Godes heauenlie Fairnes, the Lordlie-tocominge of Christ to the renewinge of Earth with Rightuosnes [...]
 * 1) *1596, Leslie, Dalrymple, The Historie of Scotland:
 * He [...] wastes, burnes, and slayes al that he tocumis, [...]

title: Citations:tocome


text:
Talk:accesar

The word "accesar" does not exist in the official spanish dictionary because it is an improper translation of the english verb "to access"; its use is a grammatical error. Use the verb "acceder" instead.
 * Wiktionary includes words that are widely used in a language, even if some persons or organizations disfavor their use. Wiktionary aims to describe the words that are used, and not just the ones found in printed dictionaries. --EncycloPetey 03:37, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:accesar


text:
Citations:Hazop

Noun

 * 1) * , B. Hancock, Chemical Engineering Research and Design, vol 60a, page 368
 * Hazop should be seen as one technique and not as the sole technique.

title: Citations:Hazop


text:
Talk:Hazop

RFV
Noun, verb, and adjective. A chemical engineering methodology with 2 alternative spellings. May ultimately be spam for someone's brand (not necessarily trademarked/servicemarked) of consulting service. DCDuring TALK 21:11, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
 * RFV-fails. - -sche (discuss) 18:15, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:Hazop


text:
trench plate

Noun

 * 1) A large heavy gauge metal plate used to span holes in streets to allow vehicular traffic across the gap.

title: trench plate


text:
Wiktionary:Requests for verification archive/November 2010

@
Appendix:Unsupported_titles/Profanity Substitution for vulgarity. I'd like to see citations for wacky unsearchable things like this. Equinox ◑ 20:52, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Do you doubt its existence, or are you merely presenting this an exercise for the citer? —msh210℠ (talk) 21:07, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I doubt its attestable existence with these exact four symbols in this exact order. Equinox ◑ 21:13, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I'd vote keep just for the sheer silliness of it. Unfortunately I know better. :P Still, I think it's worth mentioning that random characters are commonly used as a substitute for profanity. The fact that it's not those exact four symbols doesn't mean the idea is wrong on its own. —CodeCat 21:31, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
 * But it does mean that those four symbols aren't a suitably generic place to put the explanation. We could mention "used as a placeholder character in profanity" under various symbols, but I suspect that's not really a closed set. Equinox ◑ 21:34, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I often see @#$% in comments on sites where there is a filter against profanity, in this particular order and these particular symbols because it's easiest to type on english keyboards (and because it's four characters long, and ! and ^ are not as commonly used in this type of self-censoring). — lexicógrafa | háblame — 21:37, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Please provide suitable citations then! Equinox ◑ 21:39, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
 * It is nearly impossible to search for this stuff on any Google site, so I've posted six screenshots of one Yahoo! News comment feed at imagebin.ca (since I couldn't find a way to permalink the comments): — lexicógrafa | háblame — 22:03, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Besides the durable-archiving issue, if those were machine-generated obfuscations of user's words, all by the same machine (well, the same code, anyway), then they're not independent. (I'd think that the nominator could overlook the durable-archiving issues and rescind his nomination in light of the difficulty of finding this particular term durably archived....) —msh210℠ (talk) 01:38, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

 * I've found a wee bit of durably-archived indirect evidence of this, in the form of this Usenet posting. The poster has bowdlerized the text he's quoting (from this posting), replacing "fucking" with "2345ing". I imagine he meant to replace it with "@#$%ing". But not terribly compelling, I admit! —Ruakh TALK 01:50, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

I figured this would be used in comics, so I went digging, and found a number of sequences of characters, but not the one in question. - -sche (discuss) 02:13, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Failed RFV. Equinox ◑ 00:16, 9 July 2011 (UTC)


text: OPV

title: OPV


text: OPVs

title: OPVs


text:
optionally piloted vehicle

Noun

 * 1)  An aircraft that may be manned or unmanned, able to function in either mode without modification.

Usage notes
OPVs are typically remotely piloted when in unmanned mode.

title: optionally piloted vehicle


text:
Talk:'ookin'

RFV
Also 'its and 'ook (verb). All are questionable, as are some of the lemma forms --Mat200 03:58, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Now tagged  'its and  'ook so that this nomination can be found. —msh210℠ (talk) 19:18, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Easy to attest the noun sense of  'ookby searching . I suspect the others will be as easy if someone can think of a similarly indicative collocation. —msh210℠ (talk) 19:23, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Eye dialect spellings of aitchless pronunciations seem likely to be common in fiction. Do we really have to cite them in every PoS? Noun 'ook is cited, IMHO. DCDuring TALK 21:08, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Failed RFV. Equinox ◑ 00:01, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:'ookin'


text:
tideover

Etymology
.

Adjective

 * 1) Designed to support someone through a brief but often difficult period, especially financially.
 * a tideover allowance

title: tideover


text:
sebrad

Noun

 * 1) zebra

title: sebrad


text:
Talk:Duk-Duk

RFV
"A tribal language widespread in the Bismarck Archipelago." Equinox ◑ 19:06, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
 * RFV failed. Equinox ◑ 00:58, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

RFV discussion: July–September 2016
Rfv-sense:
 * 1) A god revered in the Bismarck Archipelago region of Papua New Guinea, especially in New Britain.
 * I'll pray to Duk-Duk for help.

The Duk-Duk wasn't a god, but a supernatural being impersonated by members of a secret society, also called Duk-Duk. One of them would dress up in a large costume that hid pretty much all of the body and head and go around making demands and committing acts of retribution. This being was feared and obeyed, but not worshiped or prayed to. The creator of this entry obviously took information from a real source and used it to make up things up that were just plausible enough to avoid deletion. The other current sense was originally sillier, but has been cleaned up somewhat by others- the tone is still rather un-dictionary-like. There was also a language-name sense added at the same time that has already failed rfv Chuck Entz (talk) 04:31, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

 * RFV failed. —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 19:48, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:Duk-Duk


text:
Talk:Þeodiscland

RFV
Did the Anglo-Saxons really use this word to refer to Germany? It seems unlikely because as far as I know even the Germans didn't call their country that at the time... —CodeCat 10:10, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

 * See w:ang:Gesprec:Þēodscland. Shortly said, Þeodiscland is a modern word. - -sche 04:04, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
 * That certainly doesn't help with WT:CFI. Is Old English actually practised at a native or near native level anymore? Mglovesfun (talk) 11:47, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Is that relevant? Incoherant or idiosyncratic usage should be rejected, native level or no, and language that is successfully being used to communicate should be recorded, even if it's almost unreadable to anyone not familiar with (say) Tanzanian English. If Þeodiscland is being used as a word in CFI-eligible publications, then it should be good, native or not. Of course, I don't know of anyone publishing Old English, which is going to be the hurdle to get over.--Prosfilaes 18:40, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

 * RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 20:08, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:Þeodiscland


text:
Talk:social democracy

RFV
Rfv-sense: "Theory and practice of the transition from capitalism to socialism by democratic means; increasingly replaced in usage by democratic socialism." Sounds unlikely that "social democracy" would mean "transition" of any kind. I think the first definition says it all: "A moderate political philosophy that aims to achieve socialistic goals within capitalist society such as by means of a strong welfare state and regulation of private industry." --Hekaheka 12:21, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
 * No defenders, deleting second sense. --Hekaheka 20:19, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

 * Hekaheka, a heads-up: A revision of the transitional definition has been reinserted by GreggH.  Yours, allixpeeke (talk) 20:59, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

There is apparent confusion with democratic socialism

 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_democracy
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_socialism

title: Talk:social democracy


text:
Talk:vobla

RFV
"a Russian word for a fish called the Caspian roach"

Could be, but proving it .... Would use to show approximate Russian pronunciation count as usage or mention? I think mention. DCDuring TALK 18:04, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

 * I think use to show approximate Russian pronunciation would probably be mention of the Russian word, though I'd have to see an example of what you mean. Regardless, the word does see plenty of use in English contexts. I'll see about adding some cites. —Ruakh TALK 19:16, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

 * Cited. The definition could use work, though. Writers do typically treat it as a loanword, but nowise does mean "a Russian word ". —Ruakh TALK 19:36, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

 * Update: has fixed the definition. —Ruakh TALK 23:21, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:vobla


text:
Talk:Bangladesha

RFV
Per User talk:Amit6. Cannot find any use in Latin, I did try to Vatican website and it too has no hits at all for Bangladesha, Bangladeshae or Bangladesham. Mglovesfun (talk) 18:04, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
 * NB have added one citation each for Pakistania and Nepalia. Mglovesfun (talk) 16:38, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:Bangladesha


text: AUV

title: AUV


text: AUVs

title: AUVs


text:
Talk:erupt

RFV
Rfv-sense: vomit. Uncited, not in OneLook dictionaries AFAICT. Not even in Urban Dictionary. DCDuring TALK 13:29, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
 * RFV failed, deleted as unverified. < class="latinx" >Ƿidsiþ 09:44, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

RFC discussion: December 2010
Definition "to spontaneously release pressure or tension" needs improvement --Downunder 20:23, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

title: Talk:erupt


text:
User:Varnent/Notify me

I usually contribute to the -version of as user. Please inform me of deletion notifications on my talk page there, not here.

Usage
If no project is selected the link defaults to Wikipedia. If no language is selected it defaults to the English language version.

title: User:Varnent/Notify me


text: VSOP

title: VSOP


text:
XO

Adjective

 * 1) ; a grade of premium cognac that has been aged in barrels for more than 6.5 years.

Coordinate terms

 * commanding officer
 * first officer
 * second officer
 * third officer
 * fourth officer

title: XO


text: 对牛弹琴

title: 对牛弹琴


text:
User talk:70.24.246.151

Acronyms and initialisms
These are not the same thing. If an item is labelled as one, it should not also be labelled as the other. An initialism is pronounced by naming the component letters (like UN for United Nations). An acronym is read as if it were a word (like scuba or radar). --EncycloPetey 04:11, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

company appendages
You may be interested in [[User:Msh210/Sandbox]]. —msh210℠ (talk) 18:09, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
 * It might be good if a template were created? 70.24.246.151 04:04, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Hi!
Have you possibly considered getting an account? It looks like you're doing a lot of editing recently. :) Anon edits are good but getting an account will allow you to keep better track of what you've worked on and participate in community discussion and all of that more easily. --Neskaya … gawonisgv? 06:39, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:70.24.246.151


text:
對牛彈琴

Etymology
in the story of the -era musician Gongming Yi (公明儀) playing the zither to a cow, recorded in . Mouzi used this example to illustrate the correct way to explain Buddhism to people with Confucian backgrounds.

Verb

 * 1) to talk about something that one's listener can not understand or turns a deaf ear to; to talk to a brick wall

Descendants
Others:

title: 對牛彈琴


text: User talk:Varnent

title: User talk:Varnent


text:
Talk:ordenadors

RFV
Tagged but not listed; looks really odd; plural of ordenador is ordenadores. So this would have to be an entirely separate word, which in its defence, is what it claims. Mglovesfun (talk) 01:34, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Among 50 first raw Google hits there are no Spanish-language sites. Majority are Catalan. If no one provides citations that prove the contrary, I'd say delete for the Spanish section. --Hekaheka 10:24, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

No defenders -> I proceed to kill the Spanish section.--Hekaheka 19:57, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:ordenadors


text:
Talk:You like X, don't you Squidward?

RFV
Any takers? Nothing obvious on Google book search. SemperBlotto 18:56, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Apparently originates in SpongeBob SquarePants. 86.184.132.79 21:56, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Bad entry title too, should be you like something, don't you Squidward. Mglovesfun (talk) 11:40, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
 * What a bad entry. Chuck it. TeleComNasSprVen 05:31, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Failed RFV. Has "X" as placeholder. These entries are automatically invalid as they are not attestable in this form. Use the snowclone appendix. Equinox ◑ 23:01, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:You like X, don't you Squidward?


text: paraskavedekatriaphobic

title: paraskavedekatriaphobic


text:
Talk:paraskavedekatriaphobic

RFV
Noun and adjective senses. I see nothing at bgc; ggc has AFAICT precisely one hit for the adjective and none for the noun. If it fails, convert to. —msh210℠ (talk) 20:28, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * RFV failed. Equinox ◑ 16:27, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:paraskavedekatriaphobic


text:
Thread:User talk:Yair rand/Thank you

Thank you for undeleting my user page - I do appreciate it. Without getting into it - please know that I'm not trying to be difficult - but based on experience do feel inclined to suggest that someone involved with such a large public project review their actions when even a passive observer sees red flags that their behavior (unintentionally or otherwise) may be crossing a line. Simply put - if no one ever says anything than we're all accountable should that person one day go too far or piss off too many people. In any case - thank you.

title: Thread:User talk:Yair rand/Thank you


text:
User talk:Jmolina116

Welcome!

Hello, welcome to Wiktionary, and thank you for your contribution so far. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

 * How to edit a page is a concise list of technical guidelines to the wiki format we use here: how to, for example, make text boldfaced or create hyperlinks. Feel free to practice in the sandbox. If you would like a slower introduction we have a short tutorial.
 * Entry layout explained (ELE) is a detailed policy documenting how Wiktionary pages should be formatted. All entries should conform to this standard, the easiest way to do this is to copy exactly an existing page for a similar word.
 * Our Criteria for inclusion (CFI) define exactly which words Wiktionary is interested in including. There is also a list of things that Wiktionary is not for a higher level overview.
 * The FAQ aims to answer most of your remaining questions, and there are several help pages that you can browse for more information.
 * We have discussion rooms in which you can ask any question about Wiktionary or its entries, a glossary of our technical jargon, and some hints for dealing with the more common communication issues.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wiktionarian! If you have any questions, bring them to the Information desk, or ask me on my talk page. If you do so, please sign your posts with four tildes: ~ which automatically produces your username and the current date and time.

Again, welcome! --EncycloPetey 04:38, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

IPA primary stress
When marking stress in IPA transciptions, please use the primary stress marker, and not an apostrophe (single quote). These are not the same character and display differently in different fonts. --EncycloPetey 04:59, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Recent edits
Hello Jmolina --

I noticed a couple things in your recent edits that I thought I should mention here.
 * Glosses in compounds and other sections on Japanese entry pages generally use a colon between the template and the gloss that follows.  See  for examples of this.  I noticed in this edit that you replaced the colons with hyphens.  That's not a huge issue by any means, but it does mean less consistency between entries, and seems a bit of a waste of otherwise useful effort.  :)
 * About the etymology for /, Shogakukan's 国語大辞典 lists the following, with the key text in green:
 * 大辞林 gives an identical etyl, and other sources that I've seen also give similar etymologies.
 * FWIW, I just read through parts of Martine Irma Robbeets' Is Japanese related to Korean, Tungusic, Mongolic and Turkic?, particularly the start of Chapter 6 through the intro of 6.1.1.1.1; this section includes kinoko as number 59 in the list, towards the bottom of page 91, and explicitly gives the above etymology as reason for not viewing kinoko as a single morpheme. The word kinoko also appears on page 619, where an excerpt from Starostin argues that 木の子 is a "folk etymology"; however, Robbeets' own text at the start of Chapter 6 argues fully against Starostin's view here.

 * I really appreciate you adding IPA to pages, that's a big help.  There's been some variation in the IPA conventions you've used, between square brackets [] (for strict phonetic reproduction) and slashes // (for phonemic notation, ignoring differences in pronunciation that don't affect meaning).  I'm still learning IPA myself, and two pages that I've found very useful for IPA reference are IPA and Japanese phonology.  I use the latter in particular for vowels, copying from that page and pasting into what I'm editing here, in part because the IPA selection in the Wiktionary edit box is incomplete, and I can't figure out how to type some of the symbols.  :)

Anyway, hope this helps. Feel free to drop me a line at my Talk page if you have any questions. -- Cheers, Eiríkr Útlendi │ Tala við mig 06:10, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jmolina116


text:
beflay

Etymology
From, from , equivalent to.

Verb

 * 1)  To flay; strip; peel.

title: beflay


text:
tocomen

Etymology
From, from , , equivalent to. Cognate with 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1) To come to; approach.

title: tocomen


text:
dope sheet

Noun

 * 1)  A summary, ordinarily in the form of a document, containing important facts and background information concerning a person, activity, or other subject matter.
 * 2)  A publication, updated very frequently and used by people who make horse racing wagers, which summarizes information about the horses running in specific races; a publication which provides background information and/or predictions used by people wagering on any sort of competition.
 * 3)  A summary of the content and technical information for a set of photographs.
 * 4)  A set of detailed instructions which the designer of an animated film provides to the photographers and editors.
 * 1)  A publication, updated very frequently and used by people who make horse racing wagers, which summarizes information about the horses running in specific races; a publication which provides background information and/or predictions used by people wagering on any sort of competition.
 * 2)  A summary of the content and technical information for a set of photographs.
 * 3)  A set of detailed instructions which the designer of an animated film provides to the photographers and editors.
 * 1)  A summary of the content and technical information for a set of photographs.
 * 2)  A set of detailed instructions which the designer of an animated film provides to the photographers and editors.
 * 1)  A set of detailed instructions which the designer of an animated film provides to the photographers and editors.
 * 1)  A set of detailed instructions which the designer of an animated film provides to the photographers and editors.
 * 1)  A set of detailed instructions which the designer of an animated film provides to the photographers and editors.
 * 1)  A set of detailed instructions which the designer of an animated film provides to the photographers and editors.

title: dope sheet


text: dope-sheet

title: dope-sheet


text:
truisme

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) truism

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) a truism

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) a truism

title: truisme


text: truismes

title: truismes


text: befeathers

title: befeathers


text:
syöttely

Noun

 * 1) passing act of passing a ball, puck etc. to another person back and forth for fun
 * 2) passing form of joggling

title: syöttely


text:
Talk:quadriga

RFV
Rfv-sense: "symbol of the Sun". The god of the Sun may run a quadriga, but quadriga does not generally mean "symbol of the sun" - AFAIK, that is. --Hekaheka 13:11, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
 * No defenders, proceeding to delete the sense. --Hekaheka 10:48, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

quadriga
Sense: A sculptural form featuring a representation of the subject riding a quadriga.

I did not read the citations as referring to the figure of the person, rather than the chariot, the team of horse, or both together. Whether it also clearly refers metonymically to the charioteer as well would be unsurprising, but hardly entry worthy. Further, quite apart from the apparent circularity, which could be remedied, to include this as a separate sense would be a precedent for including additional senses for every noun used to refer to something represented in an imagined or represented world (painting, sculpture, computer game, advertisement, film). Thus man:. DCDuring TALK 23:59, 17 April 2011 (UTC) IFYPFY. —msh210℠ (talk) 22:01, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, delete. --Hekaheka 13:17, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - this refers to a class of scuplture known after a particularly famous one. I would normally agree with deletion completely, along the lines that "lion" defined as "a scultpure of  a lion" is an unnecessary definition.  But a quadriga seems to be a special case of a class of sculptures, like nudes, busts, etc.  I say "weak" keep because (offhand) I can't think of another class of scultpure so narrowly focussed ("landscape" comes to mind in painting), but in modern English "quadriga" more often refer to a sculpture than to an actual chariot team, which is the reverse of most other concrete nouns that might be rendered in art. --EncycloPetey 20:19, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
 * "in modern English "quadriga" more often refer to a sculpture than to an actual chariot team" - it may depend on the fact that in modern world one sees the sculptures more often than actual chariot teams. --Hekaheka 22:42, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak delete: this seems like (as I recently mentioned re catgirl:) having a sense for tree meaning "a model of a tree made of metal, plastic, etc.". My vote is "weak" because I don't really know the word and EncycloPetey seems to know something we don't. Equinox ◑ 21:55, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

deleted -- Liliana • 03:31, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:quadriga


text:
Talk:phantasy

RFV
¶ Is this actually archaic or rare? There are ∼100 Google books past the 1970s which feature this form. Although it is an older and less common spelling, I think those tags are erroneous. --Pilcrow 13:49, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Why is this here? Mglovesfun (talk) 23:00, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I suppose that is making a "request for verification" of the correctness of the "" sense-tag. —Ruakh TALK 23:36, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
 * ¶ So should I remove this request? --Pilcrow 19:37, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I think so. Maybe ask in the tea room? This page is really more for verifying whether a given word or sense exists. —Ruakh TALK 20:02, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Hence the WT:RFM request filed by CodeCat to change the name of this page to Requests to attestation. That request has died a bit. --Mglovesfun (talk) 11:11, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Closing. --Pilcrow 22:40, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Psychology sense
This word is also used in (Kleinian?) psychology. Wikipedia has something on it. Equinox ◑ 12:55, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

 * ✅ Added by Smurrayinchester. Thanks. Equinox ◑ 13:12, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:phantasy


text:
Talk:kiki

RFV
Rfv-sense - Filipino noun. Anon user has suggested this is false (here and in rambling emails), but has always destroyed valid definitions at the same time as trying to remove the Filipino. SemperBlotto 08:19, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Would it be possible he's also ? TeleComNasSprVen 08:30, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, also and  - probably ought to be blocked for sockpuppet misuse. SemperBlotto 10:10, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
 * There is one Filipino dictionary online that lists it here. Problem is, where do you find durably archived Filipino texts and who would read them? For other dictionaries, if the word does exist they might want to exclude it, in the same way some dictionaries exclude nigger, cunt and so on. --Mglovesfun (talk) 09:50, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

 * I left a message with User:Icqgirl, who I think speaks Filipino (though she doesn't list it), but at any rate she lives there so may have better references. < class="latinx" >Ƿidsiþ 10:16, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

 * The Google translate feature gives the Filipino meaning as vulva:. I've tried Google book search using a combination of likely adjectives (!) without success as yet. SemperBlotto 14:24, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
 * There are certainly some hits in what looks to me to be Filipino texts (could be Tagalog I suppose). Oh and I've cited the French. I do find it very arrogant when I used proclaims 'this word doesn't exist', clearly he/she didn't do his research for the French. Just asked a native French speaker and she knows it. --Mglovesfun (talk) 14:32, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

 * The aforementioned anon has now taken to vandalizing my Wikipedia talk page. It seems to me that, in the absence of Filipino citations, we should assume good faith on the part of the original contributor. SemperBlotto 07:36, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * This situation, where there is an RFV and there are no speakers of that language to even try and verify it has happened before. I think last time used use and just left it hoping that eventually someone would come across it and add a citation. I'm not delighted about it, but is it any worse than deleting the entry without any evidence that it's invalid? --Mglovesfun (talk) 16:18, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

 * Hello. I have asked around what it means (chorused by embarrassed giggles, as you may imagine). The definition on the page is true. --Icqgirl 14:05, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Good enough for me, RFV closed. (We'll leave the RFquotes in though.) < class="latinx" >Ƿidsiþ 12:56, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

Non-butch/femme sense defdate
On the citations page and in the following citation there is evidence it was used from the 1940s, into the 1950s and 1960s, and Calla Felicity documents that it was used into the late 1970s as well. - -sche (discuss) 17:01, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
 * 1990, Andrew Holleran, Eric Garber, Lyn Paleo, Uranian Worlds: A Guide to Alternative Sexuality in Science Fiction, Fantasy, and Horror, G K Hall, page 5 ("Anonymous. "Kiki." Vice Versa (Los Angeles), December 1947. [F] "Kiki" makes an amusing historical comment on lesbian subculture. In 1940s lesbian slang, "kiki" meant a lesbian who was neither butch nor femme."

title: Talk:kiki


text:
Talk:pulling a train

RFV
"to pull a train" is apparently sex slang for to have sex with several partners consecutively with little or no rest between them. We'll worry about formatting if it's attested. --Mglovesfun (talk) 11:38, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Should be at pull a train, of course. I would vouch for its actual existence in the wild. Don't know about attestability. DCDuring TALK 14:30, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Would be attestable from Usenet, of course, but better from |pulls|pulling|pulled+a+train%22&tbs=,cdr:1,cd_min:Jan%201_2%201950&num=10#hl=en&ds=bo&sugexp=ldymls&pq=%22pull|pulls|pulling|pulled%20a%20train%22%20-locomotive%20-railroad&xhr=t&q=%22pull|pulls|pulling|pulled+a+train%22+-locomotive+-railroad+-engine&cp=65&qe=InB1bGx8cHVsbHN8cHVsbGluZ3xwdWxsZWQgYSB0cmFpbiIgLWxvY29tb3RpdmUgLXJhaWxyb2FkIC1lbmdpbmU&qesig=RopqRI15yhKGZr0CISKWLg&pkc=AFgZ2tlDD_cTEP7hCeGAocBGAMOdyAlHXfKJ8FmKGOAf_gMgKGWQKIfd656Gws-CmEsYrr48132pW0gYHQrDozA8v48ZLDedxg&pf=p&sclient=psy&tbs=cdr:1%2Ccd_min%3A1%2F1%2F1950%2Ccd_max%3A2011&tbm=bks&source=hp&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=%22pull|pulls|pulling|pulled+a+train%22+-locomotive+-railroad+-engine&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=ead475c9b9fbc50 this bgc search. DCDuring TALK 14:51, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I detagged it directly; hope nobody minds that. --Mglovesfun (talk) 15:44, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I sure don't. Though this isn't in "widespread use" generally, it seems to be part of coming-of-age for American males to learn about this. DCDuring TALK 18:19, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
 * It just saves time really; if there's no doubt that the term is attestable, simply copying up the citations is a low priority, given the number of entries tagged with rfv or rfv-sense. --Mglovesfun (talk) 12:57, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:pulling a train


text:
beflake

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  To take off an external layer; skin in thin flakes.
 * 2)  To deck or cover with or as with flakes.

title: beflake


text:
beflatter

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  To flatter greatly or excessively.

title: beflatter


text:
befie

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  To say "fie" to; defy.
 * 2) * 1845, Martin Marprelate (pseud.), John Petheram, Hay any worke for Cooper:
 * And ile [sic] befie em, ile befie em that will say so of me.

title: befie


title: User:Jmolina116


text:
maona

Etymology
From

Noun

 * 1)  barge, lighter, mahone

title: maona


text:
mappale

Noun

 * 1) cadastral map

title: mappale


text:
mappaluna

Noun

 * 1) map of the moon

title: mappaluna


text:
mappazza

Noun

 * 1)  stodge (heavy food)

title: mappazza


text:
mappetta

Noun

 * 1)  plastic folder

title: mappetta


text: maramaldeggiando

title: maramaldeggiando


text: maramaldeggiante

title: maramaldeggiante


text: maramaldeggiato

title: maramaldeggiato


text: maramaldeggiati

title: maramaldeggiati


text: maramaldeggiata

title: maramaldeggiata


text:
maramaldeggiare

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to act as a bully

title: maramaldeggiare


text: maramaldeggio

title: maramaldeggio


text: maramaldeggi

title: maramaldeggi


text: maramaldeggia

title: maramaldeggia


text: maramaldeggiamo

title: maramaldeggiamo


text: maramaldeggiate

title: maramaldeggiate


text: maramaldeggiano

title: maramaldeggiano


text: maramaldeggiavo

title: maramaldeggiavo


text: maramaldeggiavi

title: maramaldeggiavi


text: maramaldeggiava

title: maramaldeggiava


text: maramaldeggiavamo

title: maramaldeggiavamo


text: maramaldeggiavate

title: maramaldeggiavate


text: maramaldeggiavano

title: maramaldeggiavano


text: maramaldeggiai

title: maramaldeggiai


text: maramaldeggiasti

title: maramaldeggiasti


text:
maramaldo

Etymology
By antonomasia,, for his unchivalrous murder of a wounded opponent in battle.

Noun

 * 1) bully a person cruel to others, to those who are weaker

title: maramaldo


text: maramaldeggiò

title: maramaldeggiò


text: maramaldeggiammo

title: maramaldeggiammo


text: maramaldeggiaste

title: maramaldeggiaste


text: maramaldeggiarono

title: maramaldeggiarono


text: maramaldeggerò

title: maramaldeggerò


text: maramaldeggerai

title: maramaldeggerai


text: maramaldeggerà

title: maramaldeggerà


text: maramaldeggeremo

title: maramaldeggeremo


text: maramaldeggerete

title: maramaldeggerete


text: maramaldeggeranno

title: maramaldeggeranno


text: maramaldeggerei

title: maramaldeggerei


text: maramaldeggeresti

title: maramaldeggeresti


text: maramaldeggerebbe

title: maramaldeggerebbe


text: maramaldeggeremmo

title: maramaldeggeremmo


text: maramaldeggereste

title: maramaldeggereste


text: maramaldeggerebbero

title: maramaldeggerebbero


text: maramaldeggino

title: maramaldeggino


text:
marasso

Noun

 * 1) adder (snake)

title: marasso


text: maramaldeggiassi

title: maramaldeggiassi


text: maramaldeggiasse

title: maramaldeggiasse


text: maramaldeggiassimo

title: maramaldeggiassimo


text: maramaldeggiassero

title: maramaldeggiassero


text:
Maratona

Etymology
, from.

title: Maratona


text:
justeeri

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  two-man saw saw operated by two men, used for timber felling and sawing planks
 * 2) pitsaw two-man saw for sawing planks, one operating in a pit under the workpiece

title: justeeri