text:
Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2011-04/CFI: Removing usage in a well-known work

Various problems

 * The proposed version doesn't include the word "or", so makes it sound like we only accept words that are in clearly widespread use and are used in three durably archived works.
 * A two-element list is a bit silly, especially when the first element is so short. The sentence could easily be written inline, as “‘Attested’ means verified, either through clearly widespread use, or through usage in permanently recorded media, conveying meaning, in at least three independent instances spanning at least a year.”
 * "Clearly widespread use" is not really the same as "verified" or "attested". Previously it was listed there because there were so many list items that it made sense to structure it that way, but if we're only going to accept one kind of actual attestation, then we should say so, and then add that we do not actually require attestation for terms that are clearly in widespread use. (While we're at it, we can make explicit that "attested" has a technical sense, which isn't quite the same as our sense.)
 * It seems a bit like "cheating" to make a proposal, find that most people don't agree with it, and that some people have other, related ideas, and then still go ahead with a vote that simply reflects the original proposal. The point of requiring discussion is supposed to be that the vote structure should take that discussion into account!

—Ruakh TALK 14:52, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep the 'rationale' section IMO. --Mglovesfun (talk) 15:05, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Regarding the last point you make, I suspect this vote will go down in flames for the reasons you've highlighted. --Mglovesfun (talk) 15:11, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
 * By "go down in flames", do you mean that it will unequivocally fail, maybe as much as your nomination of Daniel. for desysopping? --Dan Polansky 16:52, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

 * Responses:
 * 1. The proposal does not intend to remove the "or"; it intends to keep the bullet list as an or-clause AKA disjunctive clause. You seem to be skilled with the change markups, so can you add "or" to the proposal the way it makes most sense? Later: I have added the "or" where it seems to belong.
 * 2. A two-element list is okay with me; this seems like a cosmetic issue.
 * 3. I have not comment on the third point; this seems like a cosmetic issue.
 * 4. I do not see that making a vote for a proposal with which some people disagree is cheating. Months have passed since the discussion that I started without anyone pursuing alternative ideas. I found the counterarguments unconvincing anyway. I do not really see why I should feel guilty about creating a vote that proposes what seems to me a reasonable course of action. Anyone is free to pursue alternative ideas, create discussions about them, and create a vote. If this vote fails, that is okay, even though I would like it to succeed. I do not understand why some people are so scared of votes that fail.
 * I do not think that I should create the vote in such a way as to take the discussion into account, as long as I disagree with the arguments presented in the discussion against the voted proposal.
 * 5. (new point) Rationale is a good idea IMHO. Now we know that msh210 and you (Ruakh) dislike rationales. I like rationales; I have missed them in votes not created by me. Instead of starting a discussion on the suitability of rationales, you have removed a rationale from a vote that I have created. Now what should I do, start an edit war?
 * --Dan Polansky 16:41, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

 * Re: #1: Thanks.
 * Re: #2: Yes, this is a cosmetic issue; it is a matter of presentation rather than of substance.
 * Re: #3: This is more than a cosmetic issue. It would not cause me to vote "oppose", but I do not think that is a reason to ignore it.
 * Re: #4: I am not so bothered by votes that fail, but I would prefer that any given vote be the best vote that it can be. I would rather have a proposal that everyone is 90% O.K. with than a proposal that 70% of us 100% love and 30% of us 100% hate. Voting is a necessary evil, but I think your approach makes it more evil than is necessary. :-P
 * Re: #5: I do actually like rationales, when they're really rationales: when it's not otherwise clear why the change is being proposed. For example, if my reason for proposing a change is not "I prefer the new version" but rather "the new version is actually how we've already been doing it, for years now", then I will document that in the vote. But in this case your rationale was actually just arguing for the change, and even went so far as to forestall a reader's potential objection (by cheating: you knew, from previous discussion, that readers already had such objections). If your rationale had stopped after the first sentence, I'd at least have been O.K. with it, but as it was, I felt that it went unacceptably far.
 * —Ruakh TALK 04:29, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

 * Re: #3: I admit that I have not noticed the issue when creating the vote. But I have now also realized that the issue that clearly widespread use is not really an attestation is there already with the current text of CFI. I do not see that the proposed change introduces the issue. The proposed change may make the issue easier to see for reducing the number of items in the list to focus on, but, again, it does not introduce it.
 * Re: #4: Voting is not necessarily an evil; this meme of "voting is evil" is doing much harm to Wiktionary. If you have a better vote in mind, feel free to create it; I will applaud.
 * Re: #5: Thank you for the explanation. Your edit summary was "remove rationale; that's what the linked-to discussions are for", so it looked like you agree with msh210 that there should be no rationales rather than thinking that my rationale was poor. By rationale I understand an answer to the question "why is the proposed change a good thing and why is it not a bad thing". The vote is not there to confirm an already clear community consensus. A rationale along the lines of "the new version is actually how we've already been doing it, for years now" is an argument by tradition, which is a rather poor form of argument, to be used as last resort in the absence of substantive reasons, IMHO anyway. It did not feel like cheating to deal with possible objections in a rationale; that is what a rationale should do, IMHO. Yes, I am taking advantage of a previous discussion, and showing that I have a response to some objections raised. Again, I do not see why this is cheating. I do not see that I intentionally create in people a false impression of how things are, other than presenting arguments that some will find wrong. People differ in their judgment of which argument is right and wrong, and I have presented no argument of which I would be convinced that it is wrong. The rationale has mere 77 words, including a sentence that points the reader to Beer parlour, so is really short. --Dan Polansky 17:10, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

 * Re: #3: I didn't say that the proposed change introduces the issue. On the contrary, I think I made clear that the proposed change merely aggravates an existing issue.
 * Re: #4: Voting is evil insofar as it seeks to substitute "supermajority" for "consensus". This substitution does harm.
 * Re: #5: That's not what rationale means, at least to me. To me, a "rationale" explains why something was done; it does not attempt to justify it. It is informative, not persuasive. My example was not an argument by tradition, firstly because it wasn't an argument, it was a rationale, and secondly because the underlying premise isn't that we should do something now because we've done it in the past, the underlying premise is that our policy pages should accurately reflect our practices.
 * —Ruakh TALK 18:43, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

 * Re: #3: Point taken. I do not think the change really makes the existing issue very much worse, though; it merely makes it more visible for the reader of the text.
 * Re: #4: I do not know what "consensus" refers to other than the support of a large majority, much larger than mere 50%. Before I came to Wiktionary, I thought that it meant unanimity, but that is not what it is supposed to mean here. From what I have seen, consensus means in Wiktionary that two to four people support, no one visibly opposes, and most editors do not know that the thing is being discussed. Sometimes, consensus means that there is a bold editor asserting "there is a consensus". I have seen no proof or at least a sketch of a proof that decision making by consensus (whatever it means, I don't know) is morally good, while decision making using supermajoritarian votes is morally bad.
 * Re: #5: Wiktionary gives two relevant definitions for "rationale" (and one definition irrelevant to this discussion), whose accuracy I do not know, though: (a) "an explanation of the basis or fundamental reasons for something", (b) "a justification or rationalization for something". I do not see much difference between them; both match my understanding of rationale. I do not see argument as contrasting to rationale, but I will stand corrected, especially if you can back your claims by something, even though I do not know what that something could be. If you would be more okay with the term "justification" or "argument", I can use it instead. On the other note, the idea that our policy pages should accurately reflect our practices (so our practices should drive our policy pages) seems to be in contradiction with your practice of aligning our practice with what the policy pages say (so letting policy pages drive our practices). Insisting that a thing can be voted upon only after it became common practice seems inadvisable. I have a sense, though, that I am misrepresenting you in some way, so please correct me where I get you wrong. --Dan Polansky 20:29, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

 * Re: "If you would be more okay with the term 'justification' or 'argument', I can use it instead": My issue is not so much with possible misuse of the term "rationale", but with using the vote description as a platform to advocate a change. Rationales are good; stump speeches are not, no matter what you call them. (I'm writing as though there's a bright line between them, but in practice, of course, there's a lot of fuzziness. I wouldn't recommend a Draconian approach. But I felt that your "rationale" strayed well beyond the fuzzy area.)
 * Re: "On the other note, the idea that our policy pages should accurately reflect our practices (so our practices should drive our policy pages) seems to be in contradiction with your practice of aligning our practice with what the policy pages say (so letting policy pages drive our practices)": There is no contradiction. I think that our policy pages and our practices should match. Where they don't, one or the other needs to be changed. (This is how things work in real life as well, at least in the U.S.: often a given law will "fall off the radar" and go ignored for years, until something happens that suddenly focuses attention on it. When that happens, sometimes it starts being enforced, and sometimes it gets repealed.)
 * —Ruakh TALK 21:20, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Re: Justification: I as a voter often ask: where is the justification or argument that the proposer is making for the proposal? I do not need that the argument or justification be present on the vote page, but I want that the creator of the vote writes a polished argument and justification that deals with possible objections, and makes it available to me, whether via a link or otherwise. Regardless of which terminology we use, I want to see a sort of thing that you do not want to see. You say that the sort of thing is not good, while I say that I as a voter feel the need to have it. You have not demonstrated in any way that they are not good. I have not demonstrated that they are good either; I merely attest to my felt need to have them. --Dan Polansky 08:36, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
 * A clarifying addition: I have classed two of your points as cosmetic issues. I do not think they are invalid, and maybe they are not all that cosmetic. But they do not change the substance of the proposal. The two issues should not really be sufficient reasons for opposing the vote; an opposer should above all want to keep the usage-in-a-well-known-work attestation option in CFI. --Dan Polansky 17:13, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Rationale
This is the rationale that I provide as the creator of the vote: This bullet point allows inclusion of terms that no one uses, such as Joyce's "bababadalgharagh...". Admittedly, the bullet point could theoretically simplify attestation of poorly attested languages such as Ancient Greek, but it is not tailored for the purpose, so it both overincludes (by including the above mentioned Joyce term) and underincludes (by failing to recognize single citations from less known works from these languages). To see more counterarguments, check the Beer parlour discussion linked to below.

--Dan Polansky 16:16, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

My revert
I have reverted three changes with which I disagree, so here comes an explanation. Above all, the section "attestation" should only define what an attestation is in Wiktionary. If it defines the term in an unusual way, so be it. If it says that a term that is in widespread use is considered attested, that is okay. The section should not say that attestation is sometimes not required; that is what another section should say. The vote should make as few changes as possible, so the voter can only ponder the one change and not the whole pack. Furthermore, I do not think that two bullets are a bad thing. They make way for another bullet that may come in future, a bullet phrased like "Usage in one durably archived work for less well attested languages". This vote is about the second bullet; it is not about other perceived problems inherited from the past CFI. --Dan Polansky 16:14, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

 * Fair enough. It'll fail anyway, so I guess the details don't matter. —Ruakh TALK 23:44, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

My most specific reason for opposing
Since we only require three citations in any work, allowing just one citation from a well-known work seems comparable. If I were to propose a change, it would be used in a 'very well known work'. --Mglovesfun (talk) 10:27, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * It is not really on par (or as you said, comparable). Three independent citations are a low number that attest to the word's being actually used. A single citation from a single author, no matter how notable the author and his work, only attest to author's ability of coining new wonna-be words. Only some words so coined make it into actual use. There is nothing wrong with author's coining new protologisms--someone has to do it--but the business of a dictionary is to document such words as are actually used, of which a single author hardly ever attests. The protologism "bababadalgharaghtakamminarronnkonnbronntonnerronntuonnthunntrovarrhounawnskawntoohoohoordenenthurnuk" exemplifies what I am referring to. As an aside, I hope you don't mind my responding to your post: if you do, just let me know. --Dan Polansky 10:49, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I will try to put it differently. It seems that you are saying that citations from very well known works are of more worth as citations of use of a word than citations from less known works, including less known novels with ISBN, and most scientific papers. I do not see why this is the case at all. --Dan Polansky 10:58, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Well it's certainly possible for a word to get three citations without being really part of the language. I could possibly support this if we were to say, a minimum of eight durably archived citations, and maybe saying a minimum of four durably archived citations with one of them being in a very well-known work. So, although I do object to the idea behind this vote a bit, my biggest objection is that this has to be accompanied with other changes to WT:CFI. Another reason, is that a lot people read well-known works, and if they want to know the meaning of a word, where can they look it up? Currently, they can look them up here, if we delete such words they'll have to use other dictionaries. Furthermore some such words aren't 'protologisms', they're just not attested in other works, or the works are hard to find. FWIW pescion that I created a month ago probably doesn't meet CFI in any way; it is attested once as the earliest spelling of what is now French poisson, but I'd be very confident (though not 100%) that there aren't two other citations out there. Sure, do reply as much as you like (I say that to anyone). --Mglovesfun (talk) 11:22, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * If a person reads a well-known work, finds a word that occurs only in that work, and needs to look this wonna-be word up in a dictionary, then the author did something wrong. If the reader of the word could not figure out what the word means, how could the authors of a dictionanry do it? They do not have a crystal ball, and the only quotations from which they can infer the meaning of the wonna-be word are the quotations in that single work. If the wanna-be word is of the form -ness where the adjective is already understood by people, the dictionary author knows how to define that wonna-be word, but so does the reader. Authors of well-know works are not more reliable source of wordhood than authors of less known works, AFAICT; some of them are rather creative and unrestrained in their coinages.
 * Does "pescion" pertain to that discussed bullet point in any way? The discussed bullet point does not save the word, does it? There could be a desirable bullet point that saves "pescion", but the discussed one is not it. --Dan Polansky 11:41, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Re pescion, no it's not relevant, I agree. --Mglovesfun (talk) 12:03, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Re: "... they'll have to use other dictionaries." I would like to see some words that are included by the single-known-work rule and that other dictionaries have. "bababadalgharaghtakamminarronnkonnbronntonnerronntuonnthunntrovarrhounawnskawntoohoohoordenenthurnuk" is not such a word, judging from OneLook and Google books. --Dan Polansky 12:12, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I could see that as a reason to keep the entries as well as one to delete them; we'd be exploiting a gap in the market that isn't cureently well dealt-with. --Mglovesfun (talk) 12:14, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Sure, true enough. If there are good reasons for including this string, our inclusion of it creates an edge over other dictionaries. Our inclusion of protologism in the mainspace would further increase our edge over them, as would the inclusion of all attestable words from fictional universes, regardless of whether they are used to refer outside of that universe or not. If you ask me, Tolkien's "mûmak" is much more of a word that the Joyce's thunderclap. People are storing the word "mûmak" in their minds (it can be fairly easily remembered), and they are uttering it when talking about Tolkien's world to each other. --Dan Polansky 12:22, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I disagree that any word only attested once is a protologism. You've picked some good examples above and on the Beer Parlour, but I don't feel like words used in Beowulf or The Song of Roland (as specific examples) that aren't attested anywhere else were simply 'made up' 'for a a laugh'. --Mglovesfun (talk) 12:27, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * But that's a different subject, the one of how to deal with attestation of words of poorly attested languages and poorly attested phases of languages. I think a bullet point along this could deal with this fairly well, containing some ambiguities nonetheless: "Usage in a single durably archived work for a less well attested language". In this bullet, there is no requirement on the work's being well known, but there is the requirement that the language or its phase must be poorly attested. --Dan Polansky 12:32, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Then I don't accept that either; impasse. --Mglovesfun (talk) 12:35, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * You don't accept that alternative bullet point? Why? --Dan Polansky 12:37, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Speaking only for myself — I don't see that alternative bullet point as relevant, because it's not in the vote. This discussion is rehashing discussions that we've already had and that you've completely disregarded. —Ruakh TALK 14:55, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Basically yes; they're two separate issues, well-known works and poorly attested languages. Since your (Dan Polansky's) point above isn't in this vote, I don't see how I can take it into account for this vote. Which brings me back to my point that if we want to remove this line of CFI, there need to be other changes accompanying it, and since those changes aren't in this vote I don't intend to support it. --Mglovesfun (talk) 16:20, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * It was you who has brought this separate issue into the discussion by mentioning Beowulf and The Song of Roland as such works that each word they contain is worthy of inclusion even if it is not used in any other work. To me, this is the only argument of yours that bears any weight; the rest is wholly unconvincing to me. --Dan Polansky 08:17, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
 * @Ruakh: I do not see what makes you say that I have "completely disregarded" all the previous discussion that was lead in Wiktionary about the well-known-works rule. I have linked to two discussions that I could find from the vote, and I have read both discussions. Actually, from what I can see in the two linked discussions, you have stated only one thing that looks like a reason, namely this: "I like that clause and have no desire to eliminate it, ...". You have as yet stated not a single specific reason for opposing this vote, other than the figurative and thus untransparent "throwing the baby out with the bathwater". It makes me wonder. --Dan Polansky 08:23, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
 * You misrepresent my words. I do not say that you have completely disregarded all the previous discussion; I say that you have completely disregarded the discussion that this discussion is rehashing. The number of reasons that I gave is irrelevant, since I explicitly said that I'm opposing for the all reasons that were given in those discussions (not just the reasons that I gave). And "throwing the baby out with the bathwater" is a common expression with a well-known meaning; see [[throw the baby out with the bathwater]]. —Ruakh TALK 12:18, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I am sorry for having misrepresented your "This discussion is rehashing discussions that we've already had and that you've completely disregarded." I have read all discussions, so I have not disregarded any of them. Anyway, saying that you oppose for all reasons without stating a single one seems evasive to me, and wholly inexplicit. You just throw in "throwing the baby out with the bathwater" without saying what the thrown baby is other than "all reasons"; other people follow. I am not saying that you are obliged to state your reasons, but in my book, you have in effect rejected to state your reasons. I do not deny that the expression with the baby is common; I am saying that it requires another layer of deciphering for no good. --Dan Polansky 07:37, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
 * O.K. then, maybe this will be more explicit: One reason that I oppose is that we currently only require one citation from Beowulf or The Song of Roland, and this would change that. You disregard this issue, saying it's "a different subject", since the current bullet-point "is not tailored for the purpose". Well, that's nonsense. This vote would have a specific ill effect, you can't say that the ill effect is somehow a separate issue from the vote that's causing it! It's separate from the case that prompted the vote — Joycean words — which I admitted were problematic — but it's part of the vote. Now you're trying to patch it up after the fact by suggesting another bullet point that would have appeased Mglovesfun, but that's rehashing past discussion that you've disregarded, and it's too late, because that bullet point isn't part of this vote. I agree with Visviva when he wrote, "I don't think the well-known-work issue can be addressed before the poorly-attested-languages issue." I think you're throwing the baby out with the bathwater, because your goal is apparently to eliminate problematic Joycean words, but your method would also eliminate many good entries. —Ruakh TALK 12:16, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I think you are right, so I have switched to oppose. --Dan Polansky 09:16, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

Inclusion of Joyce
Personally, I don't see any reason we shouldn't cover every word in Joyce to the best of our ability to.--Prosfilaes 17:43, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * We have no ability to define words used in Finnegans Wake, for example. The foundation for definitions is citation evidence. Without more than one citation, we have no basis for guessing what a word is supposed to mean. < class="latinx" >Ƿidsiþ</> 07:41, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Many nonce words are completely obvious in context, if not explicitly defined there. For Finnegans Wake, there's a large amount of discussion and theorizing that we can refer to. And if all else fails, simply the statement that we don't know what this means can be useful to the student, because then they know that You are not expected to understand this.--Prosfilaes 18:03, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Then why should not we cover every word in less known works than Joyce's, such as every word that appears in any novel published in 19th century? --Dan Polansky 08:17, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
 * It's a lot of effect for little payoff, and it's hard to tell the typo from the nonce word in many of those poorly typeset novels.--Prosfilaes 18:03, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Effort is not really a concern of CFI, if that is what you mean instead of "effect". Various contributors have various interests, leading them to contribute material that others find unworthy of their time.
 * Typos are not dealt with in the attestations section of CFI. Most typos meet this bullet point: "Usage in permanently recorded media, conveying meaning, in at least three independent instances spanning at least a year". They have to be recognized as typos by other means than attestation criteria. A typo usually looks similar in some way to its non-typo variant, but has much lower frequency than the non-typo. There is something on typos in CFI#Spellings. In any case, I would like to see a typo that is hard to recognize from a nonce word. --Dan Polansky 07:45, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

I've not heard of Finnegans Wake, but I'd imagine that if something is a well-known work, it'd be cited by many people praising Joyce for coining a new and different word out of thin air, and if it was truly well-known, there'd be at least two such other cites pertaining to the work. Thus, wouldn't "single usage in a well-known work" be redundant to "three cites in durably archived sources", if it was really well-known? TeleComNasSprVen 08:25, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The point is that Joyce deliberatly created words which were NOT real words; the whole idea of including them in a dictionary is ludicrous. Joyce would have laughed his arse off. And I repeat, there's no way we can claim to know what they mean: yes, there is a lot of scholarly analysis, but at the end of the day it's just sophisticated guesswork. Here is the second paragraph of the novel (a book I love, by the way -- I just don't want it in a dictionary) -- you tell me how we should include this sort of vocabulary:
 * Sir Tristram, violer d'amores, fr'over the short sea, had passencore rearrived from North Armorica on this side the scraggy isthmus of Europe Minor to wielderfight his penisolate war: nor had topsawyer's rocks by the stream Oconee exaggerated themselse to Laurens County's gorgios while they went doublin their mumper all the time: nor avoice from afire bellowsed mishe mishe to tauftauf thuartpeatrick: not yet, though venissoon after, had a kidscad buttended a bland old isaac: not yet, though all's fair in vanessy, were sosie sesthers wroth with twone nathandjoe.
 * Sic, by the way. < class="latinx" >Ƿidsiþ</> 08:48, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

 * Unreadable, in a book, in a dictionary. TeleComNasSprVen 08:51, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Concordance namespace
How about this: the Concordance namespace was allotted specifically for the purposes of adding unknown terms in the category of a specific literary work, including, if it ever were to be created, Joyce's nonce words at "Concordance:Finnegan's_Wake" for example. Words like these in the main namespace could be relegated to this new namespace instead, even if the "usage in a well-known work" clause was removed, and still accessible throughout and included within the Wiktionary project. TeleComNasSprVen 07:06, 11 May 2011 (UTC)


text:
keritsimet

Noun

 * 1) shears

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: keritsimet


text:
kiittimet

Etymology
Plural of.

Noun

 * 1)  fingers; used in connection with praying.

title: kiittimet


text:
rahaliitto

Noun

 * 1) monetary union

title: rahaliitto


text:
Luzoninsalmi

Etymology
🇰🇲

title: Luzoninsalmi


text: Jermain

title: Jermain


text:
skåne

Etymology
From, from , cognate with 🇨🇬. Derived from.

Verb

 * 1) to spare
 * 2) to take care of, be careful of

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to spare, show mercy

title: skåne


text: skån

title: skån


text: skåner

title: skåner


text: skånede

title: skånede


text: skånet

title: skånet


text:
in flames

Etymology
By analogy with fighter planes being shot down and bursting into flames.

Prepositional phrase

 * 1)  Dramatically and with no hope of recovery.

Usage notes

 * Chiefly used in constructions such as "go down in flames" and "shoot down in flames", often in the passive voice

title: in flames


text:
illakko

Noun

 * 1) dame's rocket,

title: illakko


text:
kylmäkkö

Noun

 * 1) Person who prepares cold foods.

title: kylmäkkö


text:
Reconstruction:Proto-Germanic/selbaz

Etymology
From, from the reflexive pronoun. Compared with 🇨🇬.

Pronoun

 * 1) self

Inflection
Although the word was clearly an a-stem, in Gothic only the weak inflection was used, and West Germanic the weak inflection was mostly used as well. Old Norse uses only the strong inflection. It's unknown what the Proto-Germanic usage was, and what the difference in meaning was, if any.

title: Reconstruction:Proto-Germanic/selbaz


text:
mausteikko

Noun

 * 1) cruet

title: mausteikko


text:
seitikko

Noun

 * 1) The digit seven.

title: seitikko


text:
Reconstruction:Proto-Germanic/samaz

Etymology
From.

Determiner

 * 1) same, alike

Inflection
As with, only the weak declension is used in Gothic. It is not known what the Proto-Germanic usage was.

title: Reconstruction:Proto-Germanic/samaz


text:
čuka

Etymology 1
. Compare 🇨🇬, dialectal Bulgarian and dialectal Serbian. According to some others, the word is borrowed from pre-Slavic substratum due to the fact that it's absent in western Slavic-speaking areas. Albanian may be the possible original substratum word, coming from the abovementioned language.

Noun

 * 1)  hill or hillock on one side extremely steep, and the other milder sloped
 * 2)  hilltop

Noun

 * 1)  clock, watch
 * 2)  hour
 * 3)  heart, ticker

title: čuka


text:
чука

Etymology
From, limited to South Slavic languages. Possibly of Paleo-Balkan origin (compare 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬) or native related to 🇨🇬,. In the later case, the word would be akin to 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) rocky hillock, peak

Etymology 1
.

Noun

 * 1) rocky peak

Verb

 * 1)  to knock, strike, beat
 * 2)  to throb, beat (e.g. heart)

Etymology 1
. Compare 🇨🇬, dialectal Bulgarian and dialectal Serbian. According to some others, the word is borrowed from pre-Slavic substratum due to the fact that it's absent in western Slavdom, the substratum language being possibly Albanian.

Noun

 * 1)  hill or hillock on one side extremely steep, and the other milder sloped
 * 2)  hilltop

Noun

 * 1)  clock, watch
 * 2)  hour
 * 3)  heart, ticker

title: чука


text:
pellicula

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  movie, film, video
 * 1)  movie, film, video

title: pellicula


text: pelliculae

title: pelliculae


text: pellicularum

title: pellicularum


text: pelliculis

title: pelliculis


text: pelliculam

title: pelliculam


text: pelliculas

title: pelliculas


text:
penetratio

Noun

 * 1) piercing, penetration

title: penetratio


text: penetrationes

title: penetrationes


text: penetrationis

title: penetrationis


text: penetrationum

title: penetrationum


text: penetrationi

title: penetrationi


text: penetrationibus

title: penetrationibus


text: penetrationem

title: penetrationem


text: penetratione

title: penetratione


text:
canuding

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1)  Nude canoeing.

title: canuding


text: penitior

title: penitior


text: penitius

title: penitius


text: penitiores

title: penitiores


text: penitiora

title: penitiora


text: penitioris

title: penitioris


text: penitiorum

title: penitiorum


text: penitiori

title: penitiori


text: penitiorem

title: penitiorem


text: penitiore

title: penitiore


text: penitioribus

title: penitioribus


text:
për kokë

Etymology
, a phrase borrowed from Latin.

Adjective

 * 1) per capita

Adverb

 * 1) per capita

title: për kokë


text:
pensilis

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) hanging (down), pendant, pensile

title: pensilis


text: pensiles

title: pensiles


text: pensilia

title: pensilia


text: pensilium

title: pensilium


text: pensilibus

title: pensilibus


text: pensilem

title: pensilem


text:
kokë turku

Etymology
Calque of

Noun

 * 1) scapegoat

title: kokë turku


text:
User talk:Bas Gaza Türkiyem

--Vahag 15:51, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bas Gaza Türkiyem


text:
wedcast

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1)  A webcast of a wedding.

title: wedcast


text: wedcasts

title: wedcasts


text:
kokëçarje

Noun

 * 1) headache
 * 2) care

title: kokëçarje


text: pensitas

title: pensitas


text: pensitat

title: pensitat


text: pensitamus

title: pensitamus


text: pensitatis

title: pensitatis


text: pensitant

title: pensitant


text: pensitabo

title: pensitabo


text: pensitabis

title: pensitabis


text: pensitabit

title: pensitabit


text: pensitabimus

title: pensitabimus


text: pensitabitis

title: pensitabitis


text: pensitabunt

title: pensitabunt


text: pensitabam

title: pensitabam


text: pensitabas

title: pensitabas


text: pensitabat

title: pensitabat


text: pensitabamus

title: pensitabamus


text: pensitabatis

title: pensitabatis


text: pensitabant

title: pensitabant


text: pensitavi

title: pensitavi


text: pensitavisti

title: pensitavisti


text: pensitavit

title: pensitavit


text: pensitavimus

title: pensitavimus


text: pensitavistis

title: pensitavistis


text: pensitaverunt

title: pensitaverunt


text: pensitavero

title: pensitavero


text: pensitaveris

title: pensitaveris


text: pensitaverit

title: pensitaverit


text: pensitaverimus

title: pensitaverimus


text: pensitaveritis

title: pensitaveritis


text: pensitaverint

title: pensitaverint


text: pensitaveram

title: pensitaveram


text: pensitaveras

title: pensitaveras


text: pensitaverat

title: pensitaverat


text: pensitaveramus

title: pensitaveramus


text: pensitaveratis

title: pensitaveratis


text: pensitaverant

title: pensitaverant


text: pensitor

title: pensitor


text: pensitaris

title: pensitaris


text: pensitamur

title: pensitamur


text: pensitamini

title: pensitamini


text: pensitatur

title: pensitatur


text: pensitantur

title: pensitantur


text: pensitabor

title: pensitabor


text: pensitaberis

title: pensitaberis


text: pensitabimur

title: pensitabimur


text: pensitabimini

title: pensitabimini


text: pensitabitur

title: pensitabitur


text:
dhembje

Etymology
Gerund of ;.

Noun

 * 1) pain
 * 2) ache

title: dhembje


text: pensitabuntur

title: pensitabuntur


text: pensitabar

title: pensitabar


text: pensitabaris

title: pensitabaris


text: pensitabamur

title: pensitabamur


text: pensitabamini

title: pensitabamini


text:
pensitans

Etymology
Present participle of.

Participle

 * 1) weighing, pondering

title: pensitans


text: pensitabatur

title: pensitabatur


text:
pensitaturus

Etymology
Future active participle of.

Participle

 * 1) about to weigh, ponder

title: pensitaturus


text: pensitabantur

title: pensitabantur


text: pensitem

title: pensitem


text:
pensitatus

Etymology
Perfect passive participle of.

Participle

 * 1) weighed, pondered

title: pensitatus


text: pensites

title: pensites


text: pensitet

title: pensitet


text:
pensitandus

Etymology
Future passive participle of.

Participle

 * 1) which is to be weighed, pondered

title: pensitandus


text: pensitemus

title: pensitemus


text: pensitetis

title: pensitetis


text: pensitent

title: pensitent


text: pensitarem

title: pensitarem


text: pensitares

title: pensitares


text: pensitaret

title: pensitaret


text: pensitaremus

title: pensitaremus


text: pensitaretis

title: pensitaretis


text: pensitarent

title: pensitarent


text: pensitantes

title: pensitantes


text: pensitaverim

title: pensitaverim


text: pensitavissem

title: pensitavissem


text: pensitantia

title: pensitantia


text: pensitavisses

title: pensitavisses


text: pensitavisset

title: pensitavisset


text: pensitantis

title: pensitantis


text: pensitavissemus

title: pensitavissemus


text: pensitantium

title: pensitantium


text: pensitavissetis

title: pensitavissetis


text: pensitavissent

title: pensitavissent


text: pensitanti

title: pensitanti


text: pensiter

title: pensiter


text: pensiteris

title: pensiteris


text: pensitante

title: pensitante


text: pensitemur

title: pensitemur


text: pensitemini

title: pensitemini


text: pensitetur

title: pensitetur


text: pensitantibus

title: pensitantibus


text: pensitentur

title: pensitentur


text: pensitarer

title: pensitarer


text: pensitareris

title: pensitareris


text: pensitantem

title: pensitantem


text: pensitaremur

title: pensitaremur


text: pensitaremini

title: pensitaremini


text: pensitaretur

title: pensitaretur


text: pensitatura

title: pensitatura


text: pensitarentur

title: pensitarentur


text: pensitaturum

title: pensitaturum


text: pensitato

title: pensitato


text: pensitaturi

title: pensitaturi


text: pensitate

title: pensitate


text: pensitatote

title: pensitatote


text: pensitaturae

title: pensitaturae


text: pensitanto

title: pensitanto


text: pensitaturorum

title: pensitaturorum


text: pensitare

title: pensitare


text: pensitator

title: pensitator


text: pensitantor

title: pensitantor


text: pensitavisse

title: pensitavisse


text: pensitari

title: pensitari


text: pensitaturarum

title: pensitaturarum


text: pensitaturo

title: pensitaturo


text: pensitaturis

title: pensitaturis


text: pensitaturam

title: pensitaturam


text: pensitaturos

title: pensitaturos


text: pensitaturas

title: pensitaturas


text: pensitature

title: pensitature


text: pensitata

title: pensitata


text: pensitatum

title: pensitatum


text: pensitati

title: pensitati


text: pensitatae

title: pensitatae


text: pensitatorum

title: pensitatorum


text: pensitatarum

title: pensitatarum


text: pensitatam

title: pensitatam


text: pensitatos

title: pensitatos


text: pensitatas

title: pensitatas


text: pensitanda

title: pensitanda


text: pensitandum

title: pensitandum


text: pensitandi

title: pensitandi


text: pensitandae

title: pensitandae


text: pensitandorum

title: pensitandorum


text: pensitandarum

title: pensitandarum


text: pensitando

title: pensitando


text: pensitandis

title: pensitandis


text: pensitandam

title: pensitandam


text: pensitandos

title: pensitandos


text: pensitandas

title: pensitandas


text: pensitande

title: pensitande


text:
peragratio

Noun

 * 1) wandering, traversing

title: peragratio


text: peragrationes

title: peragrationes


text: peragrationis

title: peragrationis


text: peragrationum

title: peragrationum


text: peragrationi

title: peragrationi


text: peragrationibus

title: peragrationibus


text: peragrationem

title: peragrationem


text: peragratione

title: peragratione


text:
perambulatio

Noun

 * 1) ramble, perambulation

title: perambulatio


text: perambulationes

title: perambulationes


text: perambulationis

title: perambulationis


text: perambulationum

title: perambulationum


text: perambulationi

title: perambulationi


text: perambulationibus

title: perambulationibus


text: perambulationem

title: perambulationem


text: perambulatione

title: perambulatione


text: percolas

title: percolas


text: percolat

title: percolat


text: percolamus

title: percolamus


text: percolatis

title: percolatis


text: percolant

title: percolant


text: percolabo

title: percolabo


text: percolabis

title: percolabis


text: percolabit

title: percolabit


text: percolabimus

title: percolabimus


text: percolabitis

title: percolabitis


text: percolabunt

title: percolabunt


text: percolabam

title: percolabam


text: percolabas

title: percolabas


text: percolabat

title: percolabat


text: percolabamus

title: percolabamus


text: percolabatis

title: percolabatis


text: percolabant

title: percolabant


text: percolavisti

title: percolavisti


text: percolavit

title: percolavit


text: percolavimus

title: percolavimus


text: percolavistis

title: percolavistis


text: percolaverunt

title: percolaverunt


text: percolavero

title: percolavero


text: percolaveris

title: percolaveris


text: percolaverit

title: percolaverit


text: percolaverimus

title: percolaverimus


text: percolaveritis

title: percolaveritis


text: percolaverint

title: percolaverint


text: percolaveram

title: percolaveram


text: percolaveras

title: percolaveras


text: percolaverat

title: percolaverat


text: percolaveramus

title: percolaveramus


text: percolaveratis

title: percolaveratis


text: percolaverant

title: percolaverant


text: percolor

title: percolor


text: percolaris

title: percolaris


text: percolamur

title: percolamur


text: percolamini

title: percolamini


text: percolatur

title: percolatur


text: percolantur

title: percolantur


text: percolabor

title: percolabor


text: percolaberis

title: percolaberis


text: percolabimur

title: percolabimur


text: percolabimini

title: percolabimini


text: percolabitur

title: percolabitur


text: percolabuntur

title: percolabuntur


text: percolabar

title: percolabar


text: percolabaris

title: percolabaris


text: percolabamur

title: percolabamur


text: percolabamini

title: percolabamini


text: percolabatur

title: percolabatur


text: percolabantur

title: percolabantur


text: percolem

title: percolem


text: percoles

title: percoles


text: percolet

title: percolet


text: percolemus

title: percolemus


text: percoletis

title: percoletis


text: percolent

title: percolent


text: percolarem

title: percolarem


text: percolares

title: percolares


text: percolaret

title: percolaret


text: percolaremus

title: percolaremus


text: percolaretis

title: percolaretis


text: percolarent

title: percolarent


text: percolaverim

title: percolaverim


text: percolavissem

title: percolavissem


text: percolavisses

title: percolavisses


text: percolavisset

title: percolavisset


text: percolavissemus

title: percolavissemus


text: percolavissetis

title: percolavissetis


text: percolavissent

title: percolavissent


text:
percoler

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to percolate

title: percoler


text: percoleris

title: percoleris


text: percolemur

title: percolemur


text: percolemini

title: percolemini


text: percoletur

title: percoletur


text: percolentur

title: percolentur


text: percolarer

title: percolarer


text: percolareris

title: percolareris


text: percolaremur

title: percolaremur


text: percolaremini

title: percolaremini


text: percolaretur

title: percolaretur


text: percolarentur

title: percolarentur


text: percolatote

title: percolatote


text: percolanto

title: percolanto


text: percolantor

title: percolantor


text: percolavisse

title: percolavisse


text: percolari

title: percolari


text:
akerit

Adjective

 * 1) anchored

title: akerit


text: miànjīn

title: miànjīn


text:
percolatio

Noun

 * 1) a    through,

title: percolatio


text:
neuakerit

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) unanchored

title: neuakerit


text: percolationes

title: percolationes


text: percolationis

title: percolationis


text: percolationum

title: percolationum


text: percolationi

title: percolationi


text: percolationibus

title: percolationibus


text: percolationem

title: percolationem


text: percolatione

title: percolatione


text:
ligj i luftës

Noun

 * 1) martial law

title: ligj i luftës


text:
ligjëratë

Noun

 * 1) speech

title: ligjëratë


text:
neuakinagh

Etymology
From +.

Adjective

 * 1) invisible

title: neuakinagh


text:
neuakinaght

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) invisibility

title: neuakinaght


text:
ligjërim

Noun

 * 1) legalization

title: ligjërim


text:
fakinagh

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) visible, discernible, perceivable

title: fakinagh


text: perditissimus

title: perditissimus


text: perditissima

title: perditissima


text: perditissimum

title: perditissimum


text: perditissimi

title: perditissimi


text: perditissimae

title: perditissimae


text: perditissimorum

title: perditissimorum


text: perditissimarum

title: perditissimarum


text: perditissimo

title: perditissimo


text: perditissimis

title: perditissimis


text: perditissimam

title: perditissimam


text: perditissimos

title: perditissimos


text: perditissimas

title: perditissimas


text: perditissime

title: perditissime


text:
ligjëroj

Etymology
From verb suffix.

Verb

 * 1) to legalize
 * 2) to deliver a speech

title: ligjëroj


text:
perforatio

Noun

 * 1) perforation
 * 2) penetration

title: perforatio


text: perforationes

title: perforationes


text: perforationis

title: perforationis


text: perforationum

title: perforationum


text: perforationi

title: perforationi


text: perforationibus

title: perforationibus


text: perforationem

title: perforationem


text: perforatione

title: perforatione


text:
ligjërisht

Adverb

 * 1) lawfully
 * 2) legally

title: ligjërisht


text:
ligjërues

Noun

 * 1) lecturer

title: ligjërues


text:
ligjzbatues

Adjective

 * 1) law-abiding

title: ligjzbatues


text:
perfunctorius

Adjective

 * 1) careless, negligent
 * 2) perfunctory

title: perfunctorius


text: perfunctoria

title: perfunctoria


text: perfunctorium

title: perfunctorium


text: perfunctorii

title: perfunctorii


text: perfunctoriae

title: perfunctoriae


text: perfunctoriorum

title: perfunctoriorum


text: perfunctoriarum

title: perfunctoriarum


text: perfunctorio

title: perfunctorio


text: perfunctoriis

title: perfunctoriis


text: perfunctoriam

title: perfunctoriam


text: perfunctorios

title: perfunctorios


text: perfunctorias

title: perfunctorias


text: perfunctorie

title: perfunctorie


text:
perfungens

Etymology
Present participle of.

Participle

 * 1) performing

title: perfungens


text:
perfuncturus

Etymology
Future active participle of.

Participle

 * 1) about to perform

title: perfuncturus


text:
perfunctus

Etymology
Perfect passive participle of.

Participle

 * 1) performed

title: perfunctus


text: perfungentes

title: perfungentes


text: perfungentia

title: perfungentia


text: perfungentis

title: perfungentis


text: perfungentium

title: perfungentium


text: perfungenti

title: perfungenti


text: perfungente

title: perfungente


text: perfungentibus

title: perfungentibus


text: perfungentem

title: perfungentem


text: perfunctura

title: perfunctura


text: perfuncturum

title: perfuncturum


text: perfuncturi

title: perfuncturi


text: perfuncturae

title: perfuncturae


text: perfuncturorum

title: perfuncturorum


text: perfuncturarum

title: perfuncturarum


text: perfuncturo

title: perfuncturo


text: perfuncturis

title: perfuncturis


text: perfuncturam

title: perfuncturam


text: perfuncturos

title: perfuncturos


text: perfuncturas

title: perfuncturas


text: perfuncture

title: perfuncture


text: perfuncta

title: perfuncta


text: perfunctum

title: perfunctum


text: perfuncti

title: perfuncti


text: perfunctae

title: perfunctae


text: perfunctorum

title: perfunctorum


text: perfunctarum

title: perfunctarum


text: perfuncto

title: perfuncto


text: perfunctis

title: perfunctis


text: perfunctam

title: perfunctam


text: perfunctos

title: perfunctos


text: perfunctas

title: perfunctas


text: perfuncte

title: perfuncte


text:
perrecturus

Etymology
Future active participle of.

Participle

 * 1) about to proceed, continue

title: perrecturus


text:
perrectus

Etymology
Perfect passive participle of.

Participle

 * 1) proceeded, continued

title: perrectus


text:
pergendus

Etymology
Future passive participle of.

Participle

 * 1) which is to be proceeded, continued

title: pergendus


text: perrectura

title: perrectura


text: perrecturum

title: perrecturum


text: perrecturi

title: perrecturi


text: perrecturae

title: perrecturae


text: perrecturorum

title: perrecturorum


text: perrecturarum

title: perrecturarum


text: perrecturo

title: perrecturo


text: perrecturis

title: perrecturis


text: perrecturam

title: perrecturam


text: perrecturos

title: perrecturos


text: perrecturas

title: perrecturas


text: perrecture

title: perrecture


text: perrecta

title: perrecta


text: perrectum

title: perrectum


text: perrecti

title: perrecti


text: perrectae

title: perrectae


text: perrectorum

title: perrectorum


text: perrectarum

title: perrectarum


text: perrecto

title: perrecto


text: perrectis

title: perrectis


text: perrectam

title: perrectam


text: perrectos

title: perrectos


text: perrectas

title: perrectas


text: perrecte

title: perrecte


text: pergenda

title: pergenda


text: pergendum

title: pergendum


text: pergendi

title: pergendi


text: pergendae

title: pergendae


text: pergendorum

title: pergendorum


text: pergendarum

title: pergendarum


text: pergendo

title: pergendo


text: pergendis

title: pergendis


text: pergendam

title: pergendam


text: pergendos

title: pergendos


text: pergendas

title: pergendas


text: pergende

title: pergende


text:
neuammysagh

Etymology
From +.

Adjective

 * 1) undutiful, irreverent

title: neuammysagh


text:
llucë

Etymology
Alteration of dialectal, borrowed through from.

Noun

 * 1) thin or shallow mud
 * 2) muddy place

title: llucë


text:
neuammys

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) undutifulness, irreverence

title: neuammys


text:
periodicus

Adjective

 * 1) periodic, periodical (returning regularly)

title: periodicus


text:
ammys

Noun

 * 1) respect, allegiance, homage

title: ammys


text: periodicum

title: periodicum


text: periodicae

title: periodicae


text: periodicorum

title: periodicorum


text: periodicarum

title: periodicarum


text: periodicis

title: periodicis


text: periodicam

title: periodicam


text: periodicos

title: periodicos


text: periodicas

title: periodicas


text: periodice

title: periodice


text:
desavouere

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to overrule

Derived terms

 * ("overruling")

title: desavouere


text:
tuloveroprosentti

Noun

 * 1) income tax rate

title: tuloveroprosentti


text: desavouer

title: desavouer


text: desavouerer

title: desavouerer


text: desavouerede

title: desavouerede


text: desavoueret

title: desavoueret


text:
perlatio

Noun

 * 1) transferal (bearing away)

title: perlatio


text: perlationes

title: perlationes


text: perlationis

title: perlationis


text: perlationum

title: perlationum


text: perlationi

title: perlationi


text: perlationibus

title: perlationibus


text: perlationem

title: perlationem


text: perlatione

title: perlatione


text: permeas

title: permeas


text: permeat

title: permeat


text: permeamus

title: permeamus


text: permeatis

title: permeatis


text: permeabo

title: permeabo


text: permeabis

title: permeabis


text: permeabit

title: permeabit


text: permeabimus

title: permeabimus


text: permeabitis

title: permeabitis


text: permeabunt

title: permeabunt


text: permeabam

title: permeabam


text: permeabas

title: permeabas


text: permeabat

title: permeabat


text: permeabamus

title: permeabamus


text: permeabatis

title: permeabatis


text: permeabant

title: permeabant


text: permeavisti

title: permeavisti


text: permeavit

title: permeavit


text: permeavimus

title: permeavimus


text: permeavistis

title: permeavistis


text: permeaverunt

title: permeaverunt


text: permeavero

title: permeavero


text: permeaveris

title: permeaveris


text: permeaverit

title: permeaverit


text: permeaverimus

title: permeaverimus


text: permeaveritis

title: permeaveritis


text: permeaverint

title: permeaverint


text: permeaveram

title: permeaveram


text: permeaveras

title: permeaveras


text: permeaverat

title: permeaverat


text: permeaveramus

title: permeaveramus


text: permeaveratis

title: permeaveratis


text: permeaverant

title: permeaverant


text: permeor

title: permeor


text: permearis

title: permearis


text: permeamur

title: permeamur


text: permeamini

title: permeamini


text: permeatur

title: permeatur


text: permeantur

title: permeantur


text: permeabor

title: permeabor


text: permeaberis

title: permeaberis


text: permeabimur

title: permeabimur


text: permeabimini

title: permeabimini


text: permeabitur

title: permeabitur


text: permeabuntur

title: permeabuntur


text: permeabar

title: permeabar


text: permeabaris

title: permeabaris


text: permeabamur

title: permeabamur


text: permeabamini

title: permeabamini


text: permeabatur

title: permeabatur


text: permeabantur

title: permeabantur


text: permeem

title: permeem


text: permees

title: permees


text: permeet

title: permeet


text:
permeans

Etymology
Present participle of.

Participle

 * 1) traversing, penetrating

title: permeans


text: permeemus

title: permeemus


text: permeetis

title: permeetis


text:
permeaturus

Etymology
Future active participle of.

Participle

 * 1) about to traverse, penetrate

title: permeaturus


text: permeent

title: permeent


text: permearem

title: permearem


text:
permeatus

Etymology
Perfect passive participle of.

Participle

 * 1) traversed, penetrated

title: permeatus


text: permeares

title: permeares


text: permearet

title: permearet


text:
permeandus

Etymology
Future passive participle of.

Participle

 * 1) which is to be traversed, penetrated

title: permeandus


text: permearemus

title: permearemus


text: permearetis

title: permearetis


text: permearent

title: permearent


text: permeaverim

title: permeaverim


text: permeavissem

title: permeavissem


text: permeavisses

title: permeavisses


text: permeavisset

title: permeavisset


text: permeavissemus

title: permeavissemus


text: permeavissetis

title: permeavissetis


text: permeavissent

title: permeavissent


text: permeer

title: permeer


text: permeantes

title: permeantes


text: permeeris

title: permeeris


text: permeemur

title: permeemur


text: permeantia

title: permeantia


text: permeemini

title: permeemini


text: permeetur

title: permeetur


text: permeantis

title: permeantis


text: permeentur

title: permeentur


text: permeantium

title: permeantium


text: permearer

title: permearer


text: permeareris

title: permeareris


text: permeanti

title: permeanti


text: permearemur

title: permearemur


text: permearemini

title: permearemini


text: permearetur

title: permearetur


text: permearentur

title: permearentur


text: permeantibus

title: permeantibus


text: permeantem

title: permeantem


text: permeatote

title: permeatote


text: permeatura

title: permeatura


text: permeanto

title: permeanto


text: permeaturum

title: permeaturum


text: permeaturi

title: permeaturi


text: permeantor

title: permeantor


text: permeavisse

title: permeavisse


text: permeaturae

title: permeaturae


text: permeari

title: permeari


text: permeaturorum

title: permeaturorum


text: permeaturarum

title: permeaturarum


text: permeaturo

title: permeaturo


text: permeaturis

title: permeaturis


text: permeaturam

title: permeaturam


text: permeaturos

title: permeaturos


text: permeaturas

title: permeaturas


text: permeature

title: permeature


text: permeatum

title: permeatum


text: permeatae

title: permeatae


text: permeatorum

title: permeatorum


text: permeatarum

title: permeatarum


text: permeatam

title: permeatam


text: permeatos

title: permeatos


text: permeatas

title: permeatas


text: permeanda

title: permeanda


text: permeandum

title: permeandum


text: permeandi

title: permeandi


text: permeandae

title: permeandae


text: permeandorum

title: permeandorum


text: permeandarum

title: permeandarum


text: permeandis

title: permeandis


text: permeandam

title: permeandam


text: permeandos

title: permeandos


text: permeandas

title: permeandas


text: permeande

title: permeande


text:
talousarvio

Noun

 * 1) budget itemized summary of intended expenditure and revenue

title: talousarvio


text:
permiscens

Etymology
Present participle of.

Participle

 * 1) intermingling

title: permiscens


text:
permixturus

Etymology
Future active participle of.

Participle

 * 1) about to intermingle

title: permixturus


text:
permiscendus

Etymology
Future passive participle of.

Participle

 * 1) which is to be intermingled

title: permiscendus


text: permiscentes

title: permiscentes


text: permiscentia

title: permiscentia


text: permiscentis

title: permiscentis


text: permiscentium

title: permiscentium


text: permiscenti

title: permiscenti


text: permiscente

title: permiscente


text: permiscentibus

title: permiscentibus


text: permiscentem

title: permiscentem


text: permixtura

title: permixtura


text: permixturum

title: permixturum


text: permixturi

title: permixturi


text: permixturae

title: permixturae


text: permixturorum

title: permixturorum


text: permixturarum

title: permixturarum


text: permixturo

title: permixturo


text: permixturis

title: permixturis


text: permixturam

title: permixturam


text: permixturos

title: permixturos


text: permixturas

title: permixturas


text: permixture

title: permixture


text: permixtum

title: permixtum


text: permiscenda

title: permiscenda


text: permiscendum

title: permiscendum


text: permiscendi

title: permiscendi


text: permiscendae

title: permiscendae


text: permiscendorum

title: permiscendorum


text: permiscendarum

title: permiscendarum


text: permiscendo

title: permiscendo


text: permiscendis

title: permiscendis


text: permiscendam

title: permiscendam


text: permiscendos

title: permiscendos


text: permiscendas

title: permiscendas


text: permiscende

title: permiscende


text: permissum

title: permissum


text:
permistus

Etymology
Perfect passive participle of.

title: permistus


text: permista

title: permista


text: permistum

title: permistum


text: permisti

title: permisti


text: permistae

title: permistae


text: permistorum

title: permistorum


text: permistarum

title: permistarum


text: permisto

title: permisto


text: permistis

title: permistis


text: permistam

title: permistam


text: permistos

title: permistos


text: permistas

title: permistas


text: permiste

title: permiste


text:
permittens

Etymology
Present participle of.

Participle

 * 1) permitting

title: permittens


text:
permissurus

Etymology
Future active participle of.

Participle

 * 1) about to permit

title: permissurus


text:
permittendus

Etymology
Future passive participle of.

Participle

 * 1) which is to be permitting

title: permittendus


text: permittentes

title: permittentes


text: permittentia

title: permittentia


text: permittentis

title: permittentis


text: permittentium

title: permittentium


text: permittenti

title: permittenti


text: permittente

title: permittente


text: permittentibus

title: permittentibus


text: permittentem

title: permittentem


text: permissura

title: permissura


text: permissurum

title: permissurum


text: permissuri

title: permissuri


text: permissurae

title: permissurae


text: permissurorum

title: permissurorum


text: permissurarum

title: permissurarum


text: permissuro

title: permissuro


text: permissuris

title: permissuris


text: permissuram

title: permissuram


text: permissuros

title: permissuros


text: permissuras

title: permissuras


text: permissure

title: permissure


text: permittenda

title: permittenda


text: permittendum

title: permittendum


text: permittendi

title: permittendi


text: permittendae

title: permittendae


text: permittendorum

title: permittendorum


text: permittendarum

title: permittendarum


text: permittendo

title: permittendo


text: permittendis

title: permittendis


text: permittendam

title: permittendam


text: permittendos

title: permittendos


text: permittendas

title: permittendas


text: permittende

title: permittende


text:
permulcens

Etymology
Present participle of.

Participle

 * 1) caressing

title: permulcens


text:
permulsurus

Etymology
Future active participle of.

Participle

 * 1) about to caress

title: permulsurus


text:
permulcendus

Etymology
Future passive participle of.

Participle

 * 1) which is to be caressed

title: permulcendus


text: permulcentes

title: permulcentes


text: permulcentia

title: permulcentia


text: permulcentis

title: permulcentis


text: permulcentium

title: permulcentium


text: permulcenti

title: permulcenti


text: permulcente

title: permulcente


text: permulcentibus

title: permulcentibus


text: permulcentem

title: permulcentem


text: permulsura

title: permulsura


text: permulsurum

title: permulsurum


text: permulsuri

title: permulsuri


text: permulsurae

title: permulsurae


text: permulsurorum

title: permulsurorum


text: permulsurarum

title: permulsurarum


text: permulsuro

title: permulsuro


text: permulsuris

title: permulsuris


text: permulsuram

title: permulsuram


text: permulsuros

title: permulsuros


text: permulsuras

title: permulsuras


text: permulsure

title: permulsure


text: permulsum

title: permulsum


text: permulcenda

title: permulcenda


text: permulcendum

title: permulcendum


text: permulcendi

title: permulcendi


text: permulcendae

title: permulcendae


text: permulcendorum

title: permulcendorum


text: permulcendarum

title: permulcendarum


text: permulcendo

title: permulcendo


text: permulcendis

title: permulcendis


text: permulcendam

title: permulcendam


text: permulcendos

title: permulcendos


text: permulcendas

title: permulcendas


text: permulcende

title: permulcende


text: pernicior

title: pernicior


text: pernicius

title: pernicius


text: perniciores

title: perniciores


text: perniciora

title: perniciora


text: pernicioris

title: pernicioris


text: perniciorum

title: perniciorum


text: perniciori

title: perniciori


text: perniciorem

title: perniciorem


text: perniciore

title: perniciore


text: pernicioribus

title: pernicioribus


text:
perniciosus

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) destructive, ruinous, baleful, pernicious

title: perniciosus


text: perniciosum

title: perniciosum


text: perniciosae

title: perniciosae


text: perniciosorum

title: perniciosorum


text: perniciosarum

title: perniciosarum


text: perniciosis

title: perniciosis


text: perniciosam

title: perniciosam


text: perniciosos

title: perniciosos


text: perniciosas

title: perniciosas


text: pernicissimus

title: pernicissimus


text: pernicissima

title: pernicissima


text: pernicissimum

title: pernicissimum


text: pernicissimi

title: pernicissimi


text: pernicissimae

title: pernicissimae


text: pernicissimorum

title: pernicissimorum


text: pernicissimarum

title: pernicissimarum


text: pernicissimo

title: pernicissimo


text: pernicissimis

title: pernicissimis


text: pernicissimam

title: pernicissimam


text: pernicissimos

title: pernicissimos


text: pernicissimas

title: pernicissimas


text: pernicissime

title: pernicissime


text:
flirtoj

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to flirt

Synonyms

 * (flirt):

title: flirtoj


text:
interpretoj

Etymology
.

Verb

 * 1) to interpret

Synonyms

 * (interpret):

title: interpretoj


text:
luaj bixhoz

Verb

 * 1) to gamble

title: luaj bixhoz


text:
bixhoz

Noun

 * 1) gamble, gambling

title: bixhoz


text:
letra bixhozi

Noun

 * 1) playing cards

title: letra bixhozi


text:
neuammyltagh

Etymology
From +.

Noun

 * 1) nonswimmer

title: neuammyltagh


text:
linjë

Etymology
From or.

Noun

 * 1) line

title: linjë


text:
amyltagh

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) swimmer

title: amyltagh


text:
Œnotria

Etymology
Borrowed from.

Proper noun

 * 1)  Ancient  in southern.

title: Œnotria


text:
linjë ajrore

Noun

 * 1) airline

title: linjë ajrore


text:
linjë telefonike

Noun

 * 1) telephone line, extension

title: linjë telefonike


text:
linjë prodhimi

Noun

 * 1) assembly line

title: linjë prodhimi


text:
linjë furnizimi

Noun

 * 1) pipeline

title: linjë furnizimi


text:
snaueder

Noun

 * 1) swimmer

title: snaueder


text:
lepur

Etymology
Borrowed through from. 🇨🇬 and 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) hare
 * 2) rabbit (lepur i gropave)
 * 3)  coward
 * 4)  fast walker

Hyponyms

 * lepur i egër
 * lepur i egër
 * lepur i egër

title: lepur


text:
kafaz lepujsh

Noun

 * 1) hutch

title: kafaz lepujsh


text:
Chicom

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1)  A member of the Communist Party of China, a Chinese cadre.
 * 2)  A proponent of Chinese Communism, whether Maoist or its subsequent development.
 * 3)  Any citizen of the People's Republic of China.

title: Chicom


text:
Talk:じやくや

Sorry to doubt this entry, but I can't find it in any other dictionary. Where can it be found? Is it not actually むちゃくちゃ? Thanks Haplology 17:59, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:じやくや


text:
såhär

Adverb

 * 1) In this way.

title: såhär


text: -sugi

title: -sugi


text:
kotec

Etymology
From a Slavic language, compare, ,.

Noun

 * 1) pen
 * 2) grain basket
 * 3)  decrepit house
 * 4)  pigsty
 * 5)  shepherd's hut
 * 6)  place where dairy is kept

Synonyms

 * (pen):, ,

Etymology
, from.

Noun

 * 1) hutch cage for rabbits

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) booth
 * 2) hutch

title: kotec


text:
kotac

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) pigsty
 * 2) dirty, filthy place
 * 1) dirty, filthy place

title: kotac


text:
котац

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) pigsty
 * 2) dirty, filthy place
 * 1) dirty, filthy place

title: котац


text:
odra

Etymology
From. Cognates include 🇨🇬 and 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) barley

Etymology
of, in reference to the red stains on the skin.

Noun

 * 1) measles, rubeola
 * 2)  measles

title: odra


text:
User talk:Peter coxhead

Welcome!
Welcome!

Hello, welcome to Wiktionary, and thank you for your contribution so far. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

 * How to edit a page is a concise list of technical guidelines to the wiki format we use here: how to, for example, make text boldfaced or create hyperlinks. Feel free to practice in the sandbox. If you would like a slower introduction we have a short tutorial.
 * Entry layout explained (ELE) is a detailed policy documenting how Wiktionary pages should be formatted. All entries should conform to this standard, the easiest way to do this is to copy exactly an existing page for a similar word.
 * Our Criteria for inclusion (CFI) define exactly which words Wiktionary is interested in including. There is also a list of things that Wiktionary is not for a higher level overview.
 * The FAQ aims to answer most of your remaining questions, and there are several help pages that you can browse for more information.
 * We have discussion rooms in which you can ask any question about Wiktionary or its entries, a glossary of our technical jargon, and some hints for dealing with the more common communication issues.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wiktionarian! If you have any questions, bring them to the Information desk, or ask me on my talk page. If you do so, please sign your posts with four tildes: ~ which automatically produces your username and the current date and time.

Again, welcome!

—Ruakh TALK 18:48, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

title: User talk:Peter coxhead


text:
drever

Noun

 * 1) A short-legged scenthound of a Swedish breed.

Translations

 * Finnish:
 * French: ,
 * German: Drever
 * Japanese: ドレーファー
 * Russian: дре́вер
 * Serbo-Croatian:
 * Cyrillic : дре́вер
 * Roman:
 * Sundanese: dachsbracke

title: drever


text:
skåning

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) Scanian a person from Scania

Related terms

 * ("Scania")
 * ("Scanian")

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) Scanian person from Scania

title: skåning


text: skåningen

title: skåningen


text:
στενός

Etymology
origin, possibly.

Adjective

 * 1) narrow, tight

Etymology
Inherited from.

Adjective

 * 1) narrow
 * 2) tight
 * 3) close

title: στενός


text: skåninger

title: skåninger


text: skåninge

title: skåninge


text: skåningerne

title: skåningerne


text: skåningene

title: skåningene


text: skånings

title: skånings


text: skåningens

title: skåningens


text: skåningers

title: skåningers


text: skåninges

title: skåninges


text: skåningernes

title: skåningernes


text: skåningenes

title: skåningenes


text: stoppolások

title: stoppolások


text: forgatások

title: forgatások


text:
kantio

Noun

 * 1) counter piece of a shoe or a boot around the heel of foot that supports the heel sideways

title: kantio


text: BOV

title: BOV


text: räiskinä

title: räiskinä


text:
CHW

Symbol

 * °N, °W
 * °N, °W
 * °N, °W

Usage notes

 * This code replaced in December 2004.

title: CHW


text: CNY

title: CNY


text: COU

title: COU


text: CUC

title: CUC


text: CLF

title: CLF


text:
Citations:proœmia

Noun: plural of

 * 1840, Karl Otfried Müller, History of the Literature of Ancient Greece, Baldwin and Cradock; Chapter VII, § 2, page #73:
 * But although these proœmia were not immediately connected with the service of the gods, and although a poet might have prefixed an invocation of this kind to an epic composition recited by him alone, without a rival, in any meeting of idle persons †, yet we may perceive from them how many and different sacred festivals in Greece were attended by rhapsodists.
 * 1840, P. W. Forchhammer, Apollon’s Ankunft in Delphi, in The Classical Museum, Taylor and Walton; Volume II, Chapter XXVI, page #413:
 * The whole appears to have been divided into two books, or as Avienus calls them volumina ; for there are two proœmia, one at the beginning of the collection, and another before the beginning of the letter M, which probably formed the beginning of the second book.
 * 1850, William Mure, A Critical History of the Language and Literature of Ancient Greece, Longman, Brown, Green and Longmans; Volume II, Book II, Chapter XXI, § 11, pages 414–415:
 * There is, therefore, much plausibility in the opinion of Hermann, now generally adopted by critical commentators, that these hundred lines of introduction comprise, not one, but several, of those proœmia habitually prefixed to the epic compositions of this early period in the public rehearsals, and afterwards embodied in the editions of the poems as portions of the genuine text. It might naturally happen, that in different manuscripts, current during the earlier ages of writing simultaneously with the more popular mode of oral promulgation, different proœmia, containing perhaps certain passages or verses in common, might be preferred.
 * 1880, Frank B. Tarbell, The Philippics of Demosthenes, Ginn & Heath; Introduction, page №. XXXVII:
 * Contrast, for instance, the extended but artistic and lucid periods into which the proœmia of the accompanying orations are cast, with the short, nervous sentences of impassioned passages like Phil. I, 10.

title: Citations:proœmia


text:
proœmia

Etymology
From.

title: proœmia


text: IQD

title: IQD


text: IRR

title: IRR


text: JMD

title: JMD


text: JOD

title: JOD


text:
JPY

Proper noun

 * 1)   singer.

title: JPY


text: KES

title: KES


text: KGS

title: KGS


text: KHR

title: KHR


text: KMF

title: KMF


text: KPW

title: KPW


text: KRW

title: KRW


text: KWD

title: KWD


text:
KYD

Symbol

 * 1)  One thousand yards, a unit of measurement.

title: KYD


text: KZT

title: KZT


text:
LAK

Adjective

 * 1)  (said of an amputee/amputation)

title: LAK


text: LKR

title: LKR


text: LRD

title: LRD


text:
LSL

Usage notes
This code replaced in May 1985.

title: LSL


text:
LVL

Noun

 * 1)  a type of engineered dimensional lumber beam, composed of laminated wood

Alternative forms

 * , lvl., Lvl., Lvl

Synonyms

 * , Lv, lv., lv, L. . L, l., l

title: LVL


text: LYD

title: LYD


text: MDL

title: MDL


text: MGA

title: MGA


text:
MMK

Usage notes
This code replaced in 1990 due to  changing its name from, which resulted in its  code changing from  to.

title: MMK


text: MNT

title: MNT


text:
MOP

Related terms

 * massive ordnance airburst

title: MOP


text: MUR

title: MUR


text: MVR

title: MVR


text: MWK

title: MWK


text: MXN

title: MXN


text: MYR

title: MYR


text: MZN

title: MZN


text: NIO

title: NIO


text: OMR

title: OMR


text: PAB

title: PAB


text:
PEN

Noun

 * 1)   a scorecard score when a skater is penalized out of their skate
 * 1)   a scorecard score when a skater is penalized out of their skate

title: PEN


text: PGK

title: PGK


text:
PKR

Proper noun

 * 1)   People's Justice Party, Malaysian liberal political party.

Proper noun

 * 1)   People's Justice Party, Malaysian liberal political party.

title: PKR


text: PLN

title: PLN


text:
RON

Coordinate terms

 * motor octane number
 * anti-knock index

title: RON


text:
RSD

Usage notes
This code replaced in 2006 due to the dissolution of, which had the  code. As was assigned the code, the currency code changed accordingly.

title: RSD


text: RWF

title: RWF


text:
SHP

English

 * 1) Abbreviation of shaft horsepower.
 * 2) Initialism of special high performance.

Proper noun

 * 1)   Social Democratic Populist Party.
 * 2)   Social Democratic People's Party.

title: SHP


text:
SLL

Usage notes
The was in the process of being redenominated, with the new leone being issued under the code. Both denominations remained in circulation for the time being until the old leone was demonetized by the end of 2023.

title: SLL


text: SZL

title: SZL


text: THB

title: THB


text: TJS

title: TJS


text: TOP

title: TOP


text: UAH

title: UAH


text: UYI

title: UYI


text: UYU

title: UYU


text: VUV

title: VUV


text: WST

title: WST


text: XAF

title: XAF


text: XBD

title: XBD


text: XCD

title: XCD


text:
XFU

Usage notes
This code was not moved to the table of historic currencies of until 2013, but the  was in practice replaced by the  in 1990, which was in turn replaced by the  in 1999.

title: XFU


text: XOF

title: XOF


text: XPF

title: XPF


text: YER

title: YER


text: ZMK

title: ZMK


text:
peix espasa

Noun

 * 1) swordfish

title: peix espasa


text: ISK

title: ISK


text: PYG

title: PYG


text: MXV

title: MXV


text: VEF

title: VEF


text: XAG

title: XAG


text: XPT

title: XPT


text: XPD

title: XPD


text: XAU

title: XAU


text: XBA

title: XBA


text:
XBB

Usage notes
Not to be confused with, the code for the former.

Proper noun

 * 1)  A variant of, a sublineage of the , a recombinant strain resulting from the mixture of   and

title: XBB


text: XBC

title: XBC


text:
Talk:multiculturalism

Rfv-sense: Tagged earlier in 2010 by Ultimateria, this is the only ever edit by - looks bogus to me, either a protologism or a misunderstanding of the primary meaning. Mglovesfun (talk) 09:24, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

 * See . As with many movements, its proponents and opponents often define it differently. It's hard to construct an NPOV definition that captures all range of uses, but it's probably not ideal to create a "POV fork" definition that implies that the proponents and opponents are simply talking about different things. (For a similar previous discussion, see Talk:feminism. That one ended up failing RFV because antifeminists are too incoherent, but antimulticulturalists — despite often being the same physical people as antifeminists — seem to be a bit better.) —Ruakh TALK 14:49, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

RFV failed, sense removed; but if anyone has any thoughts on how to improve the entry, please be bold. —Ruakh TALK 20:43, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:multiculturalism


text: orvoslások

title: orvoslások


text:
neuagglishagh

Etymology
From +.

Adjective

 * 1) lay

title: neuagglishagh


text:
casherick

Etymology
From, , from , from.

Adjective

 * 1) sacred
 * 2) sanctimonious

title: casherick


text: gǎnlǎnyóu

title: gǎnlǎnyóu


text:
organ grinder

Etymology

From the repetitive grinding involved in playing a barrel organ. In figurative senses, from the common 19th-century practice of training monkeys to dance to an organ grinder's music in order to perform on the street and solicit donations and spare change.

Noun

 * 1) The player of a barrel organ.
 * 2)  The person who is in charge, rather than a lackey or representative; the person truly responsible for another's actions.
 * 1)  The person who is in charge, rather than a lackey or representative; the person truly responsible for another's actions.
 * 1)  The person who is in charge, rather than a lackey or representative; the person truly responsible for another's actions.
 * 1)  The person who is in charge, rather than a lackey or representative; the person truly responsible for another's actions.
 * 1)  The person who is in charge, rather than a lackey or representative; the person truly responsible for another's actions.
 * 1)  The person who is in charge, rather than a lackey or representative; the person truly responsible for another's actions.
 * 1)  The person who is in charge, rather than a lackey or representative; the person truly responsible for another's actions.

Translations

 * Finnish:
 * Hungarian:
 * Macedonian:
 * Russian:

Finnish:
 * Macedonian:

title: organ grinder


text: gǎnlǎn

title: gǎnlǎn


text: organ grinders

title: organ grinders


text: gǎnlǎnqiú

title: gǎnlǎnqiú


text:
koma ekki einhverjum við

Verb

 * 1)  To be none of someone's business, to not concern somebody.

title: koma ekki einhverjum við


text: einhverjum

title: einhverjum


text:
Talk:very well

very well
RfD-sense: Adjective: "unusually well". This definition is not really different from very + well. Other adverbs can take the role of "very" with no unexpected change of meaning. Thus, it seems clearly NISoP.

RfD-sense: Adverb: "clearly". This does not see distinguishable from the literal meaning. It seems to me that all that is distinct is the construction "to VP very well [nominal phrase or clause]" where the verb is restricted to one of some cognitive activity (eg, perceiving, imagining, knowing). To engage in a cognitive activity "very well" is to do so clearly. But similarly, for an sniper to aim "very well" means to aim accurately. The "goodness" of performance of the action of a verb usually can be better specified by a well-chosen adverb.

The Adverb sense "probably" is also conveyed by well: alone, but "well" in this sense cannot be modified by very many adverbs except very:. Thus it seems to be a "bound collocation", which might make it sufficiently idiomatic to keep. In addition, it seems that only verb phrases with modal verbs like "can", "may", "could", "would", (etc ?) that are modified by "very well" in this sense.

Finally, there is still a missing sense for the usage: "I can't very well add a definition for an idiom I don't understand." That is, modal + negative, I think. DCDuring TALK 16:18, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Unless I'm missing something, it looks like you just added the "clearly" adverb sense yourself, redundant to the "" adverb sense, and then RFDed it. Why? I think delete the "clearly" sense (merge any good usex it may have acquired by the time this discussion ends into the other sense). —msh210℠ (talk) 16:41, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

 * Well, as the sense is in other dictionaries, I think it merits consideration. How an item got here is (or should be) immaterial. I am fairly skeptical about most of the senses of both all very well and very well, but not dead set against them. Some of our problem is our incredibly incomplete coverage of the senses and subsenses of well:, especially the adverb. We have 4 senses; AHD has 17. DCDuring TALK 17:04, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete the "clearly" sense. —msh210℠ (talk) 20:41, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The adjective sense nominated is just (though it doesn't use the template). Should we include that if it's the only adjective sense, since there are adverb senses? (Probably not.) —msh210℠ (talk) 20:41, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The "can't very well" sense (not in the entry yet but mentioned by DCDuring) seems to me to be the same as the "might very well" sense. we define the latter as "probably" but that's not correct: consider *will/shall very well. The very well is an addition to the might, lessening the improbability introduced by might (thereby strengthening the probability of the main verb); that's the same use in can't very well: it reduces the impossibility introduced by can't (thereby strengthening the possibility of the main verb). They're the same sense, but I'm not sure how to word it: ? —msh210℠ (talk) 20:41, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

I've deleted the "clearly" sense, seeing no objection; I've moved one of its usexes to be under the sense it was redundant to. I've modified the adjective sense to use ; it's still nominated for deletion. I've reworded the "probably" sense per my suggestion above, and added a usex and a usage note for it. I'm now tagging this section with. —msh210℠ (talk) 18:25, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Looks good. Striking. -- Prince Kassad 17:35, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Reference of usage note
Any reference for the usage note? --Backinstadiums (talk) 17:47, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

well: In all likelihood; indeed
You may well need your umbrella --Backinstadiums (talk) 17:13, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

title: Talk:very well


text:
Talk:für ungültig erklären

für ungültig erklären
doesn't look idiomatic to me. -- Prince Kassad 19:25, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

 * This entry seems to have been created because the phrase is given as a translation of rescind. Is it a good translation? In Swedish, ogiltigförklara is one word. --LA2 22:14, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

 * It is a good translation, so it can stay in the translation table at rescind, however it's not idiomatic in German. Delete. Longtrend 22:40, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

 * In cases like that, I often change the translation to only link the individual words, e.g.  für ungültig erklären  to avoid the creation of phrase entries. Conrad.Bot's Index:German/f is a good place to spot red links for such phrases that appear in translations. Click the asterisk after the red link, to find the translation entry. --LA2 10:37, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

 * This procedure seems OK for Latin-script based languages, but how should non-Latin-script entries, which are supposed to have a transliteration be treated?Matthias Buchmeier 16:15, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

 * In that case doesn't live up to its task, does it? DAVilla 05:56, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

 * You are right that it no longer indicates a useful translation of the word rescind. Perhaps  should be used instead? Then we lose the links to de.wiktionary. Which alternative is worse? --LA2 11:46, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Deleted per two native speakers above. --Mglovesfun (talk) 09:51, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:für ungültig erklären


text:
Talk:Disney

RFD
Sense: the person, Walter. We have no clear rules on this, though [[Wiktionary:CFI]] can easily be construed as relevant. Delete. —msh210℠ (talk) 16:42, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. --Yair rand (talk) 16:44, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. --Vahag 16:55, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * See Talk:Jackson and Tea room/2010/August.We have dozens - hundreds? - of definitions like these. Why delete Disney if Jackson and Wren are kept? I would Delete all definitions of persons by their real surname. There are many acceptable ways to mention the person in the entry: 1.Example sentence or citation: "Walt Disney was a motion picture producer", 2.A derived term: Disneyland, 3.External link to Wikipedia disambiguation page or to w:Walter Disney, 4:Definition like "A surname, notably of the motion picture producer w:Walt Disney", the least desirable solution because we'd end up debating who is notable enough.--Makaokalani 17:46, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. For community opinion, see also Beer parlour/2010/December, although it does not follow from the poll that "Disney" in particular has to be kept. --Dan Polansky 07:29, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Deleted nominated definition. --Mglovesfun (talk) 10:07, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Removed def
The following definition was removed by Equinox. My take is that it should not be a distinct definition since it still refers to the Walt Disney Company, though erroneously. DAVilla 02:05, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

 * 1)  An incorrect name sometimes used to refer to other, non-Disney, animation companies, apparently expressing some amount of confusion or misinfirmation on the part of the speaker.
 * Much of the world got its first glimpse of Aaliyah three years ago when she sang the Oscar-nominated "Journey to the Past" from Disney 's Anastasia at the 1998 Academy Awards.
 * [...] an almost identical situation happens in Disney ' Shrek.
 * The highly successful Star Wars franchise borrows heavily from Arthurian quest tradition, as do films such as Disney ' Shrek (2001) [...]
 * [...] an almost identical situation happens in Disney ' Shrek.
 * The highly successful Star Wars franchise borrows heavily from Arthurian quest tradition, as do films such as Disney ' Shrek (2001) [...]
 * The highly successful Star Wars franchise borrows heavily from Arthurian quest tradition, as do films such as Disney ' Shrek (2001) [...]

RFV
Rfv-sense X 4. Various entities connected with the corporate entity. I believe each needs to be separately attested under WT:BRAND, but in any event, attested. There is a missing sense of the same type without the very specific entities that, I think, may be more easily attested under WT:BRAND. DCDuring TALK 19:40, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note that I just removed another Daniel sense: "An incorrect name sometimes used to refer to other, non-Disney, animation companies, apparently expressing some amount of confusion or misinfirmation on the part of the speaker." This is like somebody mistaking one kind of flower for another and giving it the wrong name. Certainly not for a dictionary to clear up. Equinox ◑ 13:09, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Two senses RFV-failed, one passed. One sense remains to be cited. - -sche (discuss) 21:06, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I will archive this discussion and open a new one requesting verification of the noun and adjective sections, and requesting the third quotation the proper noun sense still needs. - -sche (discuss) 21:19, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

 * Additional discussion was archived to Special:PermanentLink/22590637. - -sche (discuss) 05:23, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

RFV discussion: August 2011–February 2012
A request for verification of the proper noun (Talk:Disney) gathered quotations of one sense; two senses failed and another needs a third quotation. After that RFV, a noun section and an adjective section were added. I'd like these verified as well. I have been looking for "Disneys" but finding scannos of "Disney's", and looking for "like a Disney" but finding what we (erroneously or otherwise) call "attributive use" of the noun ("like a Disney film"). - -sche (discuss) 21:23, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I have deleted the Adjective and common Noun sections as RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 01:48, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:Disney


text:
Talk:𐍅𐌹𐍃𐍄𐌹𐌻𐌴𐌹𐍃𐌴𐌹

𐍅𐌹𐍃𐍄𐌹𐌻𐌴𐌹𐍃𐌴𐌹 (wistileisei)
I believe this is a neologism, but it seems to have found its way into several Wiktionaries. The only non-Wiktionary result for this word on Google is a mailing list that confirms it's indeed a new formation, not attested in any old Gothic text. —CodeCat 00:57, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

 * Isn't this a question for RFV? It's possible this might raise a question about when we include neologisms for ancient languages, but far more likely we can't find any acceptable use under CFI at all.--Prosfilaes 01:30, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Move to RFV, although if CodeCat is correct (usually the case) this is so rare it qualifies for immediate deletion. Mglovesfun (talk) 13:57, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

deleted. no need to pester RfV with this. -- Prince Kassad 16:02, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:𐍅𐌹𐍃𐍄𐌹𐌻𐌴𐌹𐍃𐌴𐌹


text:
Talk:nanny handbook

nanny handbook
SOP. —msh210℠ (talk) 18:59, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Agree delete (might even be spam). SemperBlotto 07:12, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, almost comical it's so SoP. --Mglovesfun (talk) 12:36, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. --Actarus (Prince d'Euphor) 13:30, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * We might consider being less harsh. This seems to be the first and so far only (maybe last, after this type of critique) entry of a new user. Remember a recent message from WMF discussing the problem of diminishing number of contributors to all Wiki projects? General hostility towards annoying beginners (not exactly with this wording) was suspected to be one reason for this phenomenon. --Hekaheka 21:31, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I've put a welcome message ([[user:msh210/welcome]], which I welcome suggestions for improvements to) on his talkpage. He may be a wonderful editor, and I hope he stays/returns. But this entry is still not inclusible. —msh210℠ (talk) 21:44, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Converting more new contributors into long-term contributors seems to be a serious BP issue. If new contributors tend to believe that any noun-noun NP that might be construed in more than one way ("handbook for a nanny", "handbook by a nanny", "handbook with nannyish content", "handbook about nannies"), but is statistically more likely to have one specific construction, should be in Wiktionary, they might find support among our radical inclusionist wing. Maybe it would be an interesting project to see the distribution of prepositions that link these most commonly. But I can't imagine how we would ever recruit people to verify the assertions as to commonness.
 * And to me none of the above senses seem idiomatic, though the sense provided by the contributor is almost certainly the most common. DCDuring TALK 22:28, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I tend to agree that it's important to distinguish between contributors and their individual contributions. I agree with what Hekaheka says, but I don't think it should affect this discussion in any way. Mglovesfun (talk) 23:21, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

 * Yes, we decide solely on the merits of the entry, not on who entered it. SemperBlotto 07:23, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Yup, my comment was solely on the use of the word "comical". --Hekaheka 04:09, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

Fails, deleted. --Mglovesfun (talk) 10:33, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:nanny handbook


text:
Talk:PC

As verb: "to make politically correct". Has one cite. DCDuring TALK 15:27, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

 * And that one cite is not durably archived.
 * I didn't bother looking for "PC" and "PCs", figuring any verb would be totally drowned out by the noun senses; but I skimmed all b.g.c. hits for "pc'd", "pc'ed", and "pc'ing", as well as for case-sensitive "PCed" and "PCing". I've added the cites that I found that seem worth adding. I think the ante-2005 and 2005 cites are perfect, and the 1991 cite is serviceable. I didn't add this cite, because it's clearly just a pun (the grammar doesn't even work unless you read "PC'ing" as "be seeing").
 * So, cited.
 * I also found a number of hits using a verb "PC" related to the noun sense "personal computer", and a few related to the noun senses I've just added, of "protective custody" and "private chat". All of these verbs could probably pass RFV, but I haven't added them.
 * —Ruakh TALK 17:21, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Passed. Thanks, citer. —msh210℠ (talk) 17:43, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:PC


text: gǎnlǎnshí

title: gǎnlǎnshí


text: mosások

title: mosások


text: magyarítások

title: magyarítások


text: nimica

title: nimica


text:
nițel

Etymology
.

Adverb

 * 1) a little

title: nițel


text:
moț

Etymology
. Probably an expressive creation.

Noun

 * 1) tassel
 * 2) topknot
 * 3) forelocks

title: moț


text:
foale

Etymology
, from, derivative of.

Noun

 * 1) bellows
 * 2) abdomen, belly, paunch
 * 1) abdomen, belly, paunch

title: foale


text:
folleo

Etymology
Found in Late Latin. From.

Verb

 * 1) to bag or puff out like bellows

title: folleo


text:
follere

Noun

 * 1) roselle
 * 2) plant that is source of kenaf fiber

title: follere


text:
мадраса

Etymology
, from.

Noun

 * 1) school

title: мадраса


text: double checks

title: double checks


text: double checking

title: double checking


text: double checked

title: double checked


text:
speiübel

Adjective

 * 1) sick to one's stomach

title: speiübel


text:
triple check

Noun

 * 1) An extra check or verification made a third time, usually with additional caution or attention.
 * Did you make a double check and a triple check of the entire minefield before proceeding?

Usage notes
This form usually comes after double check, often as a synonym or variant thereof.

Verb

 * 1) To check again; to check with extra caution or attention; to verify or make sure.
 * Did you double check and triple check of the entire minefield before proceeding?

Usage notes
This form usually comes after double check, often as a synonym or variant thereof.

title: triple check


text: triple checks

title: triple checks


text: triple checking

title: triple checking


text: triple checked

title: triple checked


text:
neuaaraghys

Noun

 * 1)  abstentionism

title: neuaaraghys


text: 𫟼

title: 𫟼


text:
neuaggairagh

Etymology
From +.

Adjective

 * 1) inoffensive

title: neuaggairagh


text:
aggairagh

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) wrong, injurious, unjust

Noun

 * 1) wrongdoer, violator, aggressor

title: aggairagh


text:
Citations:novum

 * 1) The feature of a fictional work's setting, especially in science fiction, that distinguishes it from the real world.
 * 2) * "SF is distinguished by the narrative dominance or hegemony of a fictional ‘novum’ (novelty, innovation) validated by cognitive logic."

title: Citations:novum


text:
aggair

Noun

 * 1) iniquity, injustice
 * 2) aggression
 * 3) violation, injury

title: aggair


text: penny-farthings

title: penny-farthings


text:
neuslayntoil

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) unhealthy, unsanitary

title: neuslayntoil


text:
slayntoil

Adjective

 * 1) healthy, sound
 * 2) genial
 * 3) salubrious, sanitary
 * 4) sane

title: slayntoil


text: Aleyn

title: Aleyn


text:
agglishagh

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) clerical
 * 2) ecclesiastic, ecclesiastical
 * 3) canonical
 * 1) canonical

Noun

 * 1) cleric
 * 2) churchman
 * 3) divine
 * 4) ecclesiastic
 * 1) divine
 * 2) ecclesiastic

title: agglishagh


text:
eddyr-agglishagh

Etymology
From +.

Adjective

 * 1) ecumenical

title: eddyr-agglishagh


text:
eddyr-

Etymology
From.

Prefix

 * 1) inter-

title: eddyr-


text:
smeggin

Noun

 * 1)  chin

title: smeggin


text:
neusmegginagh

Etymology
From +.

Adjective

 * 1) chinless

title: neusmegginagh


text: prutter

title: prutter


text: prutterne

title: prutterne


text: prutters

title: prutters


text: prutternes

title: prutternes


text:
boarius

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) of or relating to oxen or neat cattle

title: boarius


text:
eddyr-ashoonagh

Etymology
From +.

Adjective

 * 1) international
 * 2) internationalist

title: eddyr-ashoonagh


text:
τρυπάω

Etymology
Perhaps from, a p-extension of a putative , and cognate with and 🇨🇬. A connection with 🇨🇬 is less likely.

Verb

 * 1) to bore, pierce through
 * 2) to force through

Etymology
From the modern, τρυπ- + , from , contracted form of.

Verb

 * 1) to pierce, puncture, drill, prick

title: τρυπάω


text: Tetrislike

title: Tetrislike


text:
foios

Etymology
Either from or from, with the second meaning being a.

Adjective

 * 1) leafy, foliated, with luxurious foliage
 * 2) omasum, manyplies

title: foios


text: bills of lading

title: bills of lading


text:
înfoia

Etymology
From a root, from , or from , plural of. Compare 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1) to swell, puff up, inflate
 * 2)  to put on airs
 * 1)  to put on airs

title: înfoia


text:
ποτάμι

Etymology
From, from , from , diminutive of.

Cognate with 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1)  river, stream
 * 2)  stream, flow

title: ποτάμι


text:
umfla

Etymology
, present active infinitive of. Compare 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1) to inflate, swell, puff up, blow out

title: umfla


text:
ρυάκι

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) stream, brook, rivulet

title: ρυάκι


text:
eddyr-ashoonagheyr

Noun

 * 1) internationalist

title: eddyr-ashoonagheyr


text:
eddyr-ashoonaghys

Noun

 * 1) internationalism

title: eddyr-ashoonaghys


text:
-ție

Etymology
Shortened form of, itself a borrowing based on. Compare also the Polish suffix, Russian (borrowed ultimately from the same source), which may have influenced it. Also compare the inherited.

Suffix

 * 1) -tion

title: -ție


text:
-țiune

Etymology
Longer form of, borrowed from and based partially on the older inherited form , now only found in certain older words and constructions, or as part of terms inherited from Latin.

Suffix

 * 1)  -tion

Usage notes

 * The use of -țiune is dated for most words today, with some exceptions (for example, , , , ), and has largely been replaced by -ție.

title: -țiune


text:
-ciune

Etymology
Inherited from, , and found in terms inherited from Latin as well those formed before the mid 19th century, but is otherwise no longer productive. Most modern words or neologisms use the borrowed doublets or occasionally.

Suffix

 * 1)  roughly equivalent to -tion; was used to form a noun when added to a verb root, describing that action or state related to the verb

title: -ciune


text:
neusnaueder

Noun

 * 1) nonswimmer

title: neusnaueder


text:
mórshráid

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) high street main street of any town

title: mórshráid


text:
perniciter

Adverb

 * 1) nimbly
 * 2) swiftly

title: perniciter


text:
pernosco

Verb

 * 1) to examine thoroughly
 * 2) to learn (about) thoroughly

title: pernosco


text:
bâtiment précieux

Noun

 * 1)  capital ship

title: bâtiment précieux


text: pernoscis

title: pernoscis


text: pernoscit

title: pernoscit


text: pernoscimus

title: pernoscimus


text: pernoscitis

title: pernoscitis


text: pernoscunt

title: pernoscunt


text: pernoscam

title: pernoscam


text: pernosces

title: pernosces


text: pernoscet

title: pernoscet


text: pernoscemus

title: pernoscemus


text: pernoscetis

title: pernoscetis


text: pernoscent

title: pernoscent