text:
Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2010-12/Names of individuals

Names of individuals

 * Voting on the following change to criteria for inclusion.

The section "Names of specific entities", which currently reads as follows:

This section regulates the inclusion and exclusion of names of specific entities, that is, names of individual people, names of geographic entities, names of mythological creatures, names of planets and stars, etc.

Many names of specific entities should be excluded while some should be included. With the exception of geographic entities (for which see the section "Place names"), there is no agreement on specific rules for the inclusion of names of specific entities.

will now read as follows:

This section regulates the inclusion and exclusion of names of specific entities, that is, names of individual people, names of geographic features, names of celestial objects, names of mythological creatures, names and titles of various works, etc. Some examples include the Internet, the Magna Carta, the Mona Lisa, the Qur'an, the Red Cross, the Titanic, and World War II.

A name of a specific entity must not be included if it does not meet the attestation requirement. Among those that do meet that requirement, many should be excluded while some should be included, but there is no agreement on precise, all-encompassing rules for deciding which are which. However, policies exist for names of certain kinds of entities. In particular:

 * No individual person should be listed as a sense in any entry whose page title includes both a given name or diminutive and a family name or patronymic. For instance, Walter Elias Disney, the film producer and voice of Mickey Mouse, is not allowed a definition line at Walt Disney.
 * Names of specific companies and of specific places are subject to the “Company names” and “Place names” sections of this page, respectively.
 * Names of fictional people and places are subject to the “Fictional universes” section of this page.

Such definitions as are included should be succinct rather than encyclopedic.

 * Vote starts: 00:00, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Vote ends: 24:00, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Vote created: DAVilla 02:11, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Discussion:
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] WT:RFD
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] WT:BP
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] Beer parlour archive/2010/December
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] WT:BP
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] WT:BP
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2010-12/Names of individuals

Support

 * 1) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support already! DAVilla 06:00, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support —Ruakh TALK 16:59, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support --Vahag 07:39, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support < class="latinx" >Ƿidsiþ 11:16, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support. —msh210℠ (talk) 15:54, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support  -- Prince Kassad 16:09, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * 7) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support Equinox ◑ 17:14, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * 8) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support Mglovesfun (talk) 17:18, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * 9) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support —Internoob (Disc•Cont) 04:56, 15 February 2011 (UTC) We will have to amend Walt Disney though
 * And Jesus Christ. --Daniel. 04:57, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Why? Christ is not a last name, it's a title. And we didn't include language saying it had to be idiomatic. So it's not specifically excluded. DAVilla 05:53, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Right. (I mean, it's a last name for some sense of last and some sense of name, but it's certainly not a family name or patronymic, which is what this vote addresses.) —msh210℠ (talk) 17:09, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * So in, is "H." not the middle initial it appears to be? :-P  —Ruakh TALK 18:54, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * That seems a weird distinction to me. Does that mean we can have Leonardo da Vinci, Anne of Cleves, Marie de France and so on because the second parts of their names are not family names or patronymics? Or Cher? < class="latinx" >Ƿidsiþ 08:43, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Maybe. It doesn't say we can't, but that doesn't mean we'll agree to them. DAVilla 11:48, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Normal full names are composed of two ot three words (even Icelandic ones). But, when a name has been coined for an individual, it may be considered as a word. Lmaltier 21:19, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support Because I don't disagree with the text. But I'm not happy with it: sure, many names are not acceptable, but the text may be understood as meaning we don't normally accept proper nouns, except some exceptions. I would disagree with this interpretation, I would state We accept proper nouns, provided that they can be considered as words. Lmaltier 21:19, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support Because of the Walt Disney sentence.--Makaokalani 17:21, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose  Eclecticology 08:18, 16 February 2011 (UTC) This proposal is badly written. Much of the contents deal with generalities about names, or provide redundant information.
 * It's true that a camel is a horse designed by committee, but at least we can hope or even expect that this section will be gradually modified as the gap in opinion narrows. DAVilla 11:54, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose  —Stephen (Talk) 21:59, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose Particularly badly drafted. DCDuring TALK  16:08, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Abstain

 * 1) [[Image:Symbol abstain vote.svg|20px]] Abstain Dan Polansky 12:28, 14 February 2011 (UTC) Not sure yet; better abstain. The text seems basically okay. --Dan Polansky 12:28, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Decision
passes 11-3-1. -- Prince Kassad 00:01, 14 March 2011 (UTC)


text:
apusineq

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) snowdrift

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: apusineq


text: Category:kl:Snow

title: Category:kl:Snow


text: Category:kl:Weather

title: Category:kl:Weather


text:
aputip qingartagaa

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) snowdrift

title: aputip qingartagaa


text:
աշխատակազմ

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) staff, personnel

title: աշխատակազմ


text:
Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2010-12/Names of individuals

Walt Disney
I have a question related to the proposed guideline "Individual people are not to be defined in entries where the title includes both a given and a family name."

Would the sense of Walt Disney that defines the name of a person be excluded, according to it? I would argue that "Walt" is a nickname derived from Walter instead of a given name. Moreover, I would argue that "Walt Disney" as a whole is the nickname to be kept and defined here. --Daniel. 02:41, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

 * I take Walt to be a given name, but this should probably be clarified. In this case the individual could only be listed in the etymology. Of course this says nothing about Disney. DAVilla 16:38, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

 * This has now been clarified. DAVilla 19:55, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Various feedback
The proposal seems to contain two major changes of the section for names of specific entities:

 * 1. Rephrasing the introductory paragraph.
 * 2. Introducing the sentence "Individual people are not to be defined in entries where the title includes both a given and a family name".

I do not like the rephrasing of the first paragraph, and would oppose the vote because of that. The rephrasing drops the list of various classes of names of specific entities and replaces it with examples, which I do not think is an improvement. In anything, the list of examples should be added to the list of various classes of names of specific entities. The set of examples mentions a two-word name of a star but no single-word name of a star; the same is true for names of people. I find the sentence "These encyclopedic titles are proper nouns that refer to unique persons, places or things" objectionable, as it seems to say that proper names are encyclopedic per their being proper names.

I do not like the formulation of 2, but agree with the substance; what it is trying to say I think is that "Charles Darwin" should be excluded.

The vote would be easier to discuss if it focused only on 1 or only on 2. I suppose that the core of the vote lies in 2.

The vote is not urgent; it is fairly easy to create a precedent in RFD that "Charles Darwin" and "Charles Dickens" should be excluded. Hence, as I am in considerable doubt, I err on the side of opposition. ---Dan Polansky 09:45, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

 * I list specific examples because I want it to be clear that proper nouns with two words are acceptable in certain cases, but I would not object to any changes that would win approval. Please modify the vote as you see fit, or if you really think it is not required then I will simply unlist it. DAVilla 13:23, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

 * I am trying to mostly avoid editing votes that I have not created, leaving it to the creator to incorporate my feedback into the vote; I make exceptions to this, though. I still think what I have written above. On another note, you seem not to agree with the core proposal made in the vote, as you have voted keep in RFD for "Charles Darwin". I have now voted keep in "Charles Darwin" too, on the ground that " was the Charles Darwin of" is attestable in Google books. This makes me reluctant to accept even the main proposal of the vote, numbered 2 above. --Dan Polansky 09:42, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

 * No, I'm serious. Edit it, and you can be a co-author. My understanding is, you're not opposed to a list of examples, right? You just feel there should be some classification.
 * Charles Darwin is going to be deleted, and I am not conflicted in backing a resolution that I know has community support, especially if it provides a sliver of clarity on an issue such as this. DAVilla 06:28, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

 * I have edited the vote, then. --Dan Polansky 20:09, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

 * Oh, back to the original? Okay, I'll stick to that structure, but I think we can do a bit better. Mythological creatures for instance are not really contested here, are they? DAVilla 21:52, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

 * (unindent) Names of mythological creatures ("Odin", "Medusa") are names of specific entities, aren't they? I do not know whether editors contest the inclusion of names of mythological creatures; I think some do. --Dan Polansky 22:36, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

 * I don't see any discussion on those pages, so that seems doubtable. I don't even know if they are specific entities. It might be a fictional universe type of question. I'd prefer to leave it unanswered rather than try to regulate something that no one cares about is quibbling over. DAVilla 23:14, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

 * I do not see why you are removing names of mythological creatures from the formulation. This will lead me to oppose. --Dan Polansky 23:11, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

 * [Edit conflict] Really? OK, how about adding Medusa or Odin as an example? If that's not sufficient then I have no problem in putting it back, it just doesn't seem like such a broad category.
 * Per your last edit, I'm trying to give varied examples, so let me see if I can find a single word song or something. DAVilla 23:14, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

 * But the question is not whether mythological creatures are questioned; it is whether they are specific entities. As far as I can see, they are. They are fictional or unreal specific entities (fictional individual things), but specific entities nonetheless; there are also fictional classes such as gorgon or Titan. If you want to remove them from the scope of the regulation, there should be a good reason. --Dan Polansky 23:18, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

 * Mythological creatures include gods, which is quite a numerous category. For a tentative taxonomy of names of specific entities, see Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2010-05/Placenames with linguistic information 2. --Dan Polansky 23:25, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

 * OK, I've been playing with specific examples and I don't like where it's going. I'll add the broad categories you link to and exclude all examples that fall into those categories for sake of brevity. DAVilla 00:12, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Weakest example
I don't want to have this vote fail because of a single objectionable name. What in your opinion is the weakest of the examples given, and would it keep you from voting in favor? Thanks for your participation! DAVilla 00:59, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

 * I don't like . IMHO you are fixing things that do not need fixing. I want to have a list of classes without examples rather than classes mixed with examples. Having examples in another list is okay, though.
 * I don't like this sentence: "Generally speaking, well-known topics of historical significance are more admissible, but notability is not the deciding factor. These names are included for their linguistic value and should not be given encyclopedic descriptions." It does not provide any operational criteria. It refers to how well-known "topics" are but then goes on to discard notability, a contradition. We do not need to state that encyclopedic descriptions are excluded. We do not include topics but terms and their definitions. "History of China" is a topic but not a name of specific entity.

 * Sorry for breaking in here, but I've removed that text rather than trying to fix it. If you think it's salvageable then I don't disagree with anything you've said. The motivation was to add a little meat to brittle bones. DAVilla 10:18, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

 * Thank you. I think removing the text is the best option. I acknowledge that the current text of CFI is austere, having a poor rhetorical quality. Nonetheless, we are writing a regulatory code rather than a novel ;). Thus, we are justified in writing short boring sentences that use as few juicy adjectives and as little stuffing as possible. It won't make a nice read, but it should make a good code. --Dan Polansky 10:32, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

 * I prefer referring to individual people using the term "individual people" rather than "individuals"; the latter is ambiguous.
 * There is now "names from mythology" instead of "mythological creatures"; why? You seem to have a problem with "mythological creatures" that I do not get.
 * Perhaps unsurprisingly, I find basically okay, in spite of the examples being out of order of the classes. Importantly, the revision focuses on one voted thing. --Dan Polansky 08:14, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

I have added back some language: "Where allowed, descriptions should be succinct rather than encyclopedic." The point is not to write a novel of course but to regulate the content that is added. It may seem obvious to you and me but I don't believe it's always obvious to new contributors. It also channels that frustration that Wiktionary is not an encyclopedia. Since specific entities trespass on at least some encyclopedic topics, it's appropriate to mention here. DAVilla 20:15, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Company names
I have now realized one more thing. The section of CFI on company names is not supported by a vote and I do not support the section. This vote is so worded that it could imply endorsement of the section on company names.

The vote should focus on one thing only: It should avoid referring to the section on company names. The single sentence is loaded enough to require thorough thought and attention of voters. --Dan Polansky 08:22, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Individual people are not to be defined in entries where the page title includes both a given and a family name.

 * We would be doing more by ignoring that section in this vote than we are doing by correcting this oversight. Companies are specific entities, and the guidelines that pertain to them are already in CFI whether we like it or not and regardless of how they got there. Think of this as an acknowledgement of that section rather than its contents. I'm not completely satisfied with complete exclusion either, and have already pointed out the problems where brands and companies conflate. I would expand the brand name rules to service marks and company names, basically anything where there is a commercial interest, and hopefully simplify the rules at the same time. But as you say, the focus should be on one voted thing at a time. DAVilla 07:33, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The section "Company names" should not be acknowledged. I question the legitimacy of that section. The text 'Other guidelines are provided in the sections "Company names" and "Place names". Otherwise, there is no agreement on objective rules for the inclusion of names of specific entities' implies that there is an agreement on names of companies, which is not true. After such an agreement is found in a vote dedicated to company names, the section on specific entities can be amended. --Dan Polansky 08:36, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Put differently, the current text of CFI accurately states what the case is, unlike the proposed change: "With the exception of geographic entities (for which see the section "Place names"), there is no agreement on specific rules for the inclusion of names of specific entities." --Dan Polansky 08:41, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Names of celestial objects
I find "names of planets and stars" better than "names of celestial objects", per "be specific". The point of listing the classes is not to create a complete list but rather to give a flavor of the variety of specific entities. Everyone knows what a star and a planet is, while "celestial object" is an artificial headword that could be naively taken to include artificial satellites or even airplanes. Admittedly, celestial objects also include comets and other things listed at Wikisaurus:celestial body. Also, "geographic entity" is as broad and artificial as "celestial object". I would be okay with "names of celestial objects including planets and stars". --Dan Polansky 08:33, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Or "astronomical entities". It's likely the basis for another subsection. Eclecticology 00:01, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Objective rules
I would like to see this edit to the text vote: "there is no agreement on objective rules for the inclusion of names of specific entities." There is no agreement on any rules, objective or not. The vote should avoid adding the word "objective" to the text of CFI. --Dan Polansky 08:38, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Specific rules
Only now have I noticed the removal of "specific" from "specific rules"; you meant to replace "specific" with "objective". I have used "specific" here in contrast to "vague" and "indeterminate". I think there is some agreement on vague and indeterminate rules; there is at least agreement on "Many names of specific entities should be excluded while some should be included"; most people would also agree that names of literary works should be mostly excluded, I think. I think "specific" should better say, although this would probably not be a reason for my opposing the vote. --Dan Polansky 10:40, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

 * How about definite, particular, explicit, precise or definitive? DAVilla 06:39, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

 * Definite and precise look okay, but I do not see how this is much of an improvement over "specific". Webster 1913 has also this definition of "specific": "Specifying; definite, or making definite; limited; precise; discriminating; as, a specific statement." MWO has this one "3 free from ambiguity : accurate ". But the more I think about it, I think I am actually quite okay with dropping "specific" if "specific" disturbs you. --Dan Polansky 08:40, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

 * Maybe I should add that, given the current wording of the proposal, what disturbs me most is the implicit acknowledgment of the section on company names, mentioned by me at . --Dan Polansky 08:48, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

 * I'm waiting to hear other opinions on that. I've just made some related changes that may draw attention. DAVilla 15:46, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

More general rule
Il would propose a more general rule: This rule does not solve everything, because what is a word (in its linguistic sense) might be disputed (more guidelines should be added to this rule, and we should make sure that these guidelines do not contradict the general rule). But this rule is consistent with the general CFI rule (all words, all languages), and it already clarifies things much, it solves most cases, if not all cases. Lmaltier 06:54, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Names of specific entities (with this specific entity as the definition) are includable only when they usually are considered as a word (in its linguistic sense). London, New York or Confucius are considered as words and are includable. Winston Churchill is a name but, from a linguistic point of view, it is not viewed as a single word but as a given name + a surname (two words). Therefore, no llinguistic information can be provided about this name, and this name is not includable (note that words such as Granny Smith are includable, but should not defined as specific entities).

 * I cannot support this, perhaps unsurprisingly given my past comments on this line of proposals. You have not yet explained to me how "New York" is a word while "Winston Churchill" is not a word. You seem to say that "Winston Churchill" is a semantic sum of parts, which I do not follow. I have no clear idea of what you mean by "linguistic word", other than that you include multi-word terms under this head, multi-word in terms of typographic word. --Dan Polansky 08:45, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
 * See word (3) (note that the typographic sense has been forgotten, it should be added to the page). I use the usual sense of word: some names are considered as words, e.g. town names (including New York, where the space obviously does not change anything to the nature of the term). Some names are considered as composed as several words (e.g. Winston Churchill or Excelsior Hotel). It's easy to understand once you forget the typographic sense of word, which is mostly irrelevant here. A rule of thumb might be that proper nouns (composed of several typographic words) that anybody may create (parents for their children (Winston Churchill), hotel owners for their hotels (Excelsior Hotel), etc.) are not considered as words, because they don't belong to the vocabulary of the language, while everything that can be considered as part of the vocabulary, and that language learners may have to learn, is considered as a word by linguists. Lmaltier 17:50, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

 * Personally, I would accept such a rule only if it were supported by references. Personally, I don't think of and  and  and  and  as "words", but rather as "names". I can accept the existence of alternative classifications, whereby some names are words, but before we amend WT:CFI to simply assume such a classification, I'd like to see references that support the classification and give additional information. (I'm not saying that WT:CFI itself needs to list such references, necessarily — though that might be a good idea, actually — but I need such references before I can accept such a WT:CFI.) —Ruakh TALK 05:19, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
 * You are right, this question is not simple. Here are references explaining what a word is, from a linguistic point of view. The first one explains kinds of words (parts of speech) and defines a noun as a person, place, or thing. It gives cat, horse, mother, Denmark as examples of nouns; but I think that almost everybody would agree that Denmark or Confucius are words: The word "Confucius" has no meaning to Chinese who call the philosopher Kong Fuzi or Kong Qiu (Master Kong). (oregonstate.edu), The word "Confucius" occurs as such in the following languages: English, Franco-Provençal/Arpitan, Bambara, Central_Bicolano, Bislama, (...) (www.tititudorancea.com).
 * The second one is interesting, as it explains that a usual sense of word is lexical item, and explains what a lexical item is (this is very important here); it also explains what a grammatical word form is (we include them too, unlike other dictionaries).
 * http://www.englishchick.com/grammar/grrem.htm#noun
 * http://www.sussex.ac.uk/linguistics/documents/essay_-_what_is_a_word.pdf
 * http://www.sil.org/linguistics/GlossaryOfLinguisticTerms/WhatIsAWord.htm
 * http://www.uottawa.ca/academic/arts/writcent/hypergrammar/nouns.html#noun considers Portia White as a noun and therefore, seems to consider it as a word. But this is not a lexical item from a linguistic point of view, as no interesting linguistic information can be provided about it (but it might be considered as a lexical item in an encyclopedic dictionary).
 * I am convinced that we should strictly follow the rule all words, all languages, and we should focus discussion and get a consensus on three fundamental points
 * what is a word?
 * what is a language?
 * when is it possible to consider that a given word is used in a given language?
 * Lmaltier 08:42, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Ready to open
According to the vote page, this should already be open. Mglovesfun (talk) 16:09, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm glad it hasn't started yet though. The wording still needed a few days to work out the kinks, and to get some oddball ideas out of my system. DAVilla 18:34, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Tories
I don't think "the Tories" is a good example to use in the phrasing. They are the Tory (common noun) + -s. Equinox ◑ 17:35, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Okay. Thanks for pointing it out early. DAVilla 18:31, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Walt Disney (the man)
DAVilla's just added "For instance, Walter Elias Disney is allowed a definition line at Disney but not at Walt Disney." which incorporates a controversial allowance where only the negation is needed: "For instance, Walter Elias Disney, the person, is not allowed a definition line at Walt Disney.". —msh210℠ (talk) 07:28, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, it would imply that defining people by their real surname is commonly accepted, and I'd certainly vote against that idea.--Makaokalani 17:19, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Corrected. Let me know of any other objections to this. DAVilla 18:30, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

 * I think that Walt Disney could be an excellent candidate for deletion as encyclopedic. Using one's own name for a corporation or organization does not strike me as a distinct usage; there's no shortage of people who have done that. A better example of a usable name would be John Hancock because of its general application to anyone's signature. Eclecticology 00:20, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Defining individual people
Instead of this: there could be this: This would resolve Ruakh's complaint that people are not "defined" anyway. Instead of "definition line", the term "sense line" can be used, if preferred. --Dan Polansky 19:04, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
 * "Individual people are not to be defined in entries where the page title includes both a given and a family name."
 * "No individual person should have a definition line in an entry whose page title includes both a given and a family name."

 * Modified a bit further to contrast the sentence that follows. DAVilla 19:39, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

 * Put the person himself in the etymology. Eclecticology 00:22, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

how to word the definitions
See. How to word the definitions doesn't really belong in the CFI. Moreover, including this line opens a can of worms: how do we define 'succinct'? 'encyclopedic'? I certainly agree sense lines should be succinct rather than encyclopedic, but I don't that that should be included in this vote. —msh210℠ (talk) 20:13, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

 * See my comment in . It is not a criterion, but it is relevant in this section.
 * I added the language precisely because it is agreed upon and not in dispute. It is important to state somewhere as a guideline, and precision is not important as we already have a very good sense of how to apply it. A brief mention of content is entirely pertinent to topics that tread on what have often been construed as encyclopedic. DAVilla 20:26, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Component words
I'm not entirely opposed to excluding terms whose "full meaning is transparent from component words", but I want to make sure you understand that this will almost certainly result in the deletion of Church of England and Anglican Church, Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Church of Rome and Roman Catholic Church, Church of Scotland, Church of Scientology, and Episcopal Church. It will leave the Catholic Church defined as Roman Catholic only. It will also bring into question how idiomatic terms like World War II are, although I suppose there is always room for argument. I doubt 1 Corinthians and Ancient Rome will survive, Great Wall of China will probably be truncated, and we will see many other bystanders. DAVilla 20:44, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

 * I added that because I assumed it was uncontroversial, but if you think I was mistaken, please revert. —Ruakh TALK 20:46, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

 * I'm honestly not sure. I've seen that exact argument made but not universally applied. I'm OK with the implications as long as everyone else is. DAVilla 20:50, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh, and Jesus Christ becomes an epithet. Yikes, maybe not! DAVilla 21:09, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

The full meaning may be transparent from component words, and the term be a set phrase, a word, nonetheless, if it belongs to the vocabulary of the language, if learners have to learn it to be able to write the language well. Each case has to be considered. Users read, but they also write. Lmaltier 06:30, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

 * I think that, for the definition of attestation and idiomacity, the reader should be referred to the existing sections, to avoid redundancy. So I would propose this edit or the like:
 * "The attestation and idiomaticity requirements apply to names of specific entities, just as to any other terms: see and  . if a name is not found in use, or if its full meaning is transparent from component words, then it should not be included.
 * Or the result could look like this:
 * "The attestation and idiomaticity requirements apply to names of specific entities, just as to any other terms."
 * --Dan Polansky 07:32, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Although, on a second thought, idiomacity of proper names is an odd concept, not quite like idiomacity of non-proper names including common nouns.
 * What can be safely stated I think is this:
 * "The attestation requirement applies to names of specific entities, just as to any other terms."
 * --Dan Polansky 07:35, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Notability
The recently added text

 * "Although the attestation requirement applies to names of specific entities, permitted entries could be characterized as well known enough that attestation is not valuable. There are proposals for criteria that seek citations with particular qualifications. If these have merit, there is not yet consensus on any such requirement."

should be replaced with

 * "The attestation requirement applies to names of specific entities, just as to any other terms."

or with

 * "To be included, the name of a specific entity must meet the attestation requirement."

by my lights anyway. --Dan Polansky 08:45, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

 * Sorry, I kind of went a new direction with this, and you got to it before I could say anything. DAVilla 09:08, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

 * I agree with Dan on this, not because I think that names not "well known enough that attestation is not valuable" should be included, but because I fear others think so and inclusion of this clause might possibly doom the vote where it otherwise would pass. —msh210℠ (talk) 07:34, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

 * I also agree. We must keep simple. I even believe that the same simple criteria should apply to everything characterizable as words with linguistic information (exceptions being trademarks, which require special criteria, and infinite lists such as numbers, which deserve special attestation rules). Lmaltier 08:18, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Revised. I'm not trying to sneak anything in here. Rather, I'm trying to add something without saying anything, and that can be tricky. Why bother? Because these guidelines need to be developed, and it's easier to build from a foundation. We all know that the Great Sphinx of Giza is not immediately justified just because we might decide that it can be included at Sphinx, so I've modified Dan's wording to "the title of its entry" though I'm not sure if there's a better way of saying this. ("Headword" seems strange since it wouldn't necessarily be a single word.) Also I think it gives entirely the wrong impression to leave this hanging at attestation since attestation will never be the sole criterion unless we want to include every title of every research paper ever published. So Dan et al., if you have any objection to the current wording, which is hopefully much more moderate and not focused on notability, please give a reason for every piece to be cut if at all possible. DAVilla 09:05, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

 * You seem to try to introduce some tentative criteria, in spite of "There is no agreement on precise, all-encompassing rules for the inclusion of names of specific entities, ...". I don't like this. The attestation is there as a condition necessary for inclusion, not sufficient, so there was nothing wrong with "To be included, the name of a specific entity must meet the attestation requirement" that would require the use of the phrasing "title of its entry". The title of the entry is identical with the each name under discussion, anyway. If this is not obvious from the phrasing, it can be made even more explicit: "As a necessary but not sufficient condition for the inclusion, the name of a specific entity must meet the attestation requirement". --Dan Polansky 09:40, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Lexicon
This should be removed, IMHO:

 * "Although there is not yet consensus on any particular guidelines, in practice certain citations may prove more valuable than others in demonstrating that the name has entered the lexicon."

I have never understood what it means for a name to "have entered the lexicon". Wiktionary currently does not even have a suitable definition of "lexicon"; the best matching one seems to be "The vocabulary used by or known to an individual". I do not understand what it means for the name of a star such as "Aldebaran" to have come a part of the vocabulary. This smells of requiring proper names to refer to something else than their literal referents, a requirement that I reject. --Dan Polansky 09:33, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't understand why this sentence was added or what its purpose is. Of course some citations may prove more valuable than others: any of us who have ever attempted to cite a word knows that. Why put that statement into the CFI? —msh210℠ (talk) 21:39, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

 * I suspect that the statement is an allusion to "attributive use" and "out-of-context use" rules past and present and the like: three quotations could adequately demonstrate that a term is in fact used as a name for a given specific entity, without being the sort of quotations that would convince all editors that such use merits inclusion. —Ruakh TALK 22:10, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Ah, that makes sense now. Thanks. But it's vague enough (and adds no criterion) that I don't think it merits inclusion. —msh210℠ (talk) 03:10, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I agree. —Ruakh TALK 16:35, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, since three of us think so and no one else has commented, I'm removing it. —msh210℠ (talk) 04:00, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

This may seem trivial, but
I want to revert. The second half of the edited sentence should be written as an explanation for the first. When they're written as two sentences, it seems as though the second stands alone and might even supersede the paragraph's first sentence (requiring attestation). Thoughts? —msh210℠ (talk) 16:08, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

 * Agreed. Actually, how about:
 * Among those that do meet that requirement, many should be excluded while some should be included, but there is no agreement on precise, all-encompassing rules for deciding which are which.
 * ? That makes the relationship even clearer, I think.
 * —Ruakh TALK 16:30, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Your (Ruakh's) last proposal sounds good to me. --Dan Polansky 17:11, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
 * And me. —msh210℠ (talk) 17:26, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

 * What about the relationship with the next sentence? Either of the above could be done there as well:
 * "There is no agreement on precise, all-encompassing rules for the inclusion of names of specific entities; however, policies exist for names of certain kinds of entities."
 * "While there is no agreement on precise, all-encompassing rules for the inclusion of names of specific entities, policies exist for names of certain kinds of entities."
 * As to Ruakh's proposal, I don't like having a counterpoint followed by a counterpoint. All of the sentences in the paragraph carve out little sections on the same topic. I don't see more compelling reason to link any two together than any other pair. But this is quite minor. DAVilla 06:54, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

 * Seeing three quarters of the very few people who've commented in this section in favor, I've effected Ruakh's proposal. —msh210℠ (talk) 17:33, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Changes needed
I come to this without having read the proposal before it was put to a vote, and in my fresh view I find much of it wordy and difficult to follow. I would make these specific points: Eclecticology 23:14, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Is this a section or a subsection? Much of it seems to deal to deal generally with names (or better "Proper Names") rather than any clearly defined entities. To the extent that that is the case it would be better placed there, and the rest significantly reduced.
 * 2) As long as the page is "CFI" there is no need to mention "exclusion" if one follows the principle that whatever does not fit inclusion must be excluded.
 * 3) Delete the examples in the first paragraph of the proposal. These only add to the confusion; It is difficult to relate them to the preceding list.
 * 4) Why mention attestation here? Attestation is a broader more general rule. Either it applies everywhere or it doesn't. It should not need to be mentioned except where a clear exception is being made. Referring to it here only introduces doubt.
 * 5) Stating in some form that there is no agreement is better mentioned only at the head of the names section. This allows its various subsections to deal only with issues where a clear decision exists.
 * 6) The expression "No individual person should be listed as a sense ..." is incomprehensible. I have no idea what that clause is trying to say.
 * 7) The other two bulletted clauses aren't needed because sections already exist for them.
 * 8) The final sentence isn't needed either because it deals with a general pprinciple that applies to all articles.

 * 1, 5 & 7. CFI could probably use an overhaul at some point, but that's nearly impossible to do when people don't agree on the substance of what it should say. I suppose it might be reasonable to adopt an outline somehow without altering the exact text except as it refers to this outline. That's a much bigger undertaking however.
 * 2. Unfortunately we don't agree on what should be included in this case, so we have to chip from both ends.
 * 3. It is impossible to list every type of proper noun under consideration. I had tried to delete the list instead with some objection. The examples given are all terms that fall under this section. Giving only examples of things listed would be misleading.
 * 4. I don't know. It had evolved from something else. Idiomaticity should also be a general rule, but it's stranger to apply here. We're left stating what we do know for certain, obvious though it may be.
 * 6. Then read the for instance.
 * 8. There is a bit of discussion of that already on this talk page. I would point out that CFI has a lot of information that is relevant to particular sections but does not fall under the heading of criteria. For instance:
 * * "When citing a quotation from a book, please include the ISBN."
 * * "An additional section explaining why the term is a misspelling should be considered optional."
 * * "Care should be taken so that entries do not become encyclopedic in nature; if this happens, such content should be moved to Wikipedia, but the dictionary entry itself should be kept."
 * DAVilla 08:10, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Wiktionary is not an encyclopedia
We've failed to realize that WT:CFI is in direct contrast to current practice. It says that Wiktionary is not about places, contradicting the section on place names. The example of Houdini is actually defined as the escapologist in the entry, an issue put to RFD. And I'm not sure that we shouldn't identify David as a statue. Should we just remove this section entirely? DAVilla 07:45, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

 * I have proposed removing the second paragraph of the section in Beer parlour recently, but there was some opposition. We may give it a try in a vote anyway. Removing the complete section, both paragraphs, seems likely to meet with even greater opposition. I am all for removing the second paragraph. See also Beer parlour archive/2010/December. --Dan Polansky 08:22, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

 * ...which I participated in, to my surprise.
 * The second paragraph is the crux of that section. The first paragraph mirrors what I wrote here, that definitions should be succinct rather than encyclopedic, which several people had objected to and only I have defended. I say delete the second paragraph and sooner or later we'll realize the two sections are talking about the same thing and should be merged. DAVilla 11:43, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

 * If you create a vote for removing the whole section, I will support, but chances are higher more people will oppose. A vote could propose both the small removal and the big removal as subvotes. --Dan Polansky 11:51, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

 * I would find it more acceptable to keep and seriously clean up the essential not-an-encyclopedia section than to keep the final sentence of the present proposal. "Succinct" and "encyclopedic" are not antonyms, and it is easy to conceive of a text that is both or neither.  "Wiktionary is not an encyclopedia" and "Wikipedia is not a dictionary" need to be viewed as complementary; some overlap is both necessary and desirable. There is not and should not be a bright line that separates the two.  It takes reading the entire CFI page after a couple of years of absence to see what kind of a disjointed patchwork it has become.  The current process of voting on everything only makes things worse because it encourages looking at certain paragraphs and sections in isolation without regard to what is said in other sections.  A good rule of thumb in rule-making is to move from the general to the specific. The general applies to everything. The more specific provisions that then follow do not override the general unless that is made explicit. That obviates the need to keep repeating that a general principle continues to apply. Eclecticology 19:45, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

 * CFI is no more disjointed now than it was the last time it was edited by you, 2 February 2006: see . Voting does not make anything worse. Ever since the requirement of all changes to CFI being made by a vote was there, the uncontrolled growth of CFI has stopped. We have achieved some significant improvements of CFI through voting, such as the removal of the unsupported attributive-use rule. Step at a time, we are moving CFI closer to saying things on which we actually widely agree. --Dan Polansky 20:22, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

 * I didn't say the existing text was worse, I used words like "mirror" and "merge" to say it was the same idea. If you like, replace what I wrote with that text, not that we regularly transwiki to Pedia but whatever. A big part of the problem is that encyclopedic can mean different things to different contributors here. What does it mean when content is removed because it has "become encyclopedic in nature" yet leaving "the dictionary entry itself"?
 * I'm not keen on voting in every minor change either, and I'm sure a top-down approach would produce a much better result, I'm just not certain we can go top to bottom because we're not all in agreement on what CFI should contain. But I think it's worth putting some thought into.
 * In my opinion the current rules are all refinements of specific points, most already made in the general rules. Fictional Universes in essence specifies that works within the same fictional universe are not independent. This vote indicates that first name plus last name is not idiomatic. Brand names adds two criteria that could be generalized: no commercial interest, and not defined within, the latter applying nicely as a criterion to abbreviations and to mathematical terms.
 * Place Names as manifested throws a wrench into the whole situation. DAVilla 09:05, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

I don't understand. Where is the contradiction? Wiktionary is not about places, it's not about animals, it's not about clothes, etc., it's about words, their sense, thei pronunciation, their etymology, etc. This includes words such as cat, shirt, London or Houdini, with their sense (for Houdini, the sense is an individual, this is a fact). Both Wikipedia and Wiktionary may have pages titled cat, shirt, London or Houdini, but their contents must be very different. If you assume (this is not quite true in practice) that Wikipedia is 100% encyclopedic and Wiktionary 100% a language dictionary, the only common part should be the definition (an encyclopedia normally also includes a short definition before developing the subject). Here, this definition should be as succinct as possible, but should always be sufficient to understand what the word means (in some cases, e.g. in mathematics, understanding what the word means requires a long, very technical, definition). Lmaltier 22:29, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

 * Some have insisted that, while Wiktionary must not be encyclopedic, whenever Wikipedia can be used as a dictionary, then Wiktionary should not have such a dictionary entry. Sometimes there is crossover, but Wiktionary should have dictionary entries regardless of whether Wikipedia can be used as a dictionary for some terms. For example, we can’t have a dictionary entry for 陳港生 because Wikipedia can be used as a dictionary for this (to a certain extent). —Stephen (Talk) 23:45, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
 * It would be absurd to exclude lightning on the ground that Wikipédia explains what lightning is. This is a word, therefore it should be included. Never forget that a language dictionary provides a definition, but also much linguistic information that Wikipedia cannot provide (e.g. translations in 1000 languages or more, anagrams, etc.), because Wikipedia pages are about topics, not about words. Principles are simple, they should be applied. And I don't understand your example about 陳港生: obviously Wikipedia (in English) cannot create this entry. Lmaltier 17:25, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Lmaltier, if you try to access the article "陳港生" on the English Wikipedia, you'll discover that it is a redirect to Jackie Chan. Here is a link: 陳港生. --Daniel. 00:20, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm bewildered... But I assume that it should not be included here, not because of WIkipedia, but because it's not a word (if it's considered as a single word, it should be included). Lmaltier 21:56, 18 February 2011 (UTC)


text:
frór

Adjective

 * 1) calm, quiet

title: frór


text:
Category talk:Vietnamese Hán tự

Merge
I would support a merge of Category:Vietnamese Han tu into this category (Category talk:Vietnamese Hán tự), for the reason that there is not a term "Han tu" (without diacritics) in any language, whereas "Hán tự" is the proper Vietnamese term for the Chinese characters formerly used in Vietnam. 71.66.97.228 02:58, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

title: Category talk:Vietnamese Hán tự


text:
akisussaaffik

Noun

 * 1) responsibility
 * 2) liability

title: akisussaaffik


text:
Talk:WTB

Please verify
This edit. 71.66.97.228 03:01, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

 * ✅ It was removed. Equinox ◑ 22:22, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:WTB


text:
mind rhyme

Noun

 * 1) A form of rhyme in which a rhyming word is omitted, and left to be "heard" only in the reader's mind.

title: mind rhyme


text:
end rhyme

Noun

 * 1)  The form of rhyme (rhyming) which uses sameness of sound of the last words of lines from the vowels in their stressed syllables to their ends.
 * 2)  A word that rhymes with another in that it is pronounced identically with the other word from the vowel in its stressed syllable to the end.

title: end rhyme


text:
eye rhyme

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) A pair of words (or syllables) that, because of their spelling, look as if they rhyme but, because of different pronunciation, do not. Many eye rhymes are historic rhymes.

title: eye rhyme


text:
tail rhyme

Noun

 * 1) rhyme in which the rhyming lines in each verse are followed by a shorter line; these shorter lines sometimes rhyme with each other

title: tail rhyme


text: end rhymes

title: end rhymes


text: internal rhymes

title: internal rhymes


text:
super-heavy water

Noun

 * 1)  Water containing tritium instead of normal hydrogen: $3$H$2$O, or less correctly, T$2$O.

Synonyms

 * T2O
 * 3H2O

Hypernyms

 * H2O
 * H2O

title: super-heavy water


text: tail rhymes

title: tail rhymes


text: mind rhymes

title: mind rhymes


text:
broken rhyme

Noun

 * 1)  The splitting of the final word in a line of poetry (onto the next line) such that a rhyme is formed from a syllable other than the last.

title: broken rhyme


text: eye rhymes

title: eye rhymes


text:
half rhyme

Noun

 * 1) An imperfect rhyme in which the final (coda) consonants of stressed syllables (and, in modern English poetry, any following syllables to the end of the words) are identical in sound, but the vowels of the stressed syllables are not.

title: half rhyme


text:
sprung rhyme

Noun

 * 1) A form of rhyme in which the number of syllables varies, the stressed syllable being the first one.

title: sprung rhyme


text: broken rhymes

title: broken rhymes


text:
imperfect rhyme

Noun

 * 1) near rhyme
 * 2) half rhyme

title: imperfect rhyme


text:
head rhyme

Noun

 * 1) The use of alliteration at the beginning of stressed syllables

title: head rhyme


text:
oblique rhyme

Noun

 * 1) half rhyme

title: oblique rhyme


text:
syllabic rhyme

Noun

 * 1) verse that has a fixed number of syllables per line (though not always the same number of stressed syllables)

title: syllabic rhyme


text:
slant rhyme

Noun

 * 1) half rhyme

title: slant rhyme


text:
forced rhyme

Noun

 * 1) A rhyme that is produced by changing the normal spelling of a word, or by changing the normal structure of a phrase.

title: forced rhyme


text:
masculine rhyme

Noun

 * 1) A simple rhyme on single stressed syllables.

title: masculine rhyme


text:
feminine rhyme

Noun

 * 1) A disyllabic rhyme that occurs on an unaccented final syllable (a feminine ending).

title: feminine rhyme


text: oblique rhymes

title: oblique rhymes


text: masculine rhymes

title: masculine rhymes


text: forced rhymes

title: forced rhymes


text: imperfect rhymes

title: imperfect rhymes


text: slant rhymes

title: slant rhymes


text: sprung rhymes

title: sprung rhymes


text: half rhymes

title: half rhymes


text: head rhymes

title: head rhymes


text: syllabic rhymes

title: syllabic rhymes


text: feminine rhymes

title: feminine rhymes


text: աբխազի

title: աբխազի


text: աբխազից

title: աբխազից


text: աբխազով

title: աբխազով


text: աբխազների

title: աբխազների


text: աբխազներից

title: աբխազներից


text: աբխազներով

title: աբխազներով


text: աբխազներ

title: աբխազներ


text:
աբխազին

Noun

 * 1) definite
 * 2) definite

title: աբխազին


text:
աբխազը

Noun

 * 1) definite

title: աբխազը


text:
աբխազն

Noun

 * 1) definite

title: աբխազն


text:
աբխազներին

Noun

 * 1) definite
 * 2) definite

title: աբխազներին


text:
աբխազները

Noun

 * 1) definite

title: աբխազները


text:
աբխազներն

Noun

 * 1) definite

title: աբխազներն


text: աբխազերենի

title: աբխազերենի


text: ազգեր

title: ազգեր


text: job descriptions

title: job descriptions


text:
role conflict

Noun

 * 1)  a conflict among the roles corresponding to two or more statuses.

Translations

 * Danish: rollekonflikt
 * German: Rollenkonflikt
 * Greenlandic: atuuffiit imminnut assortuuttut
 * Norwegian:
 * Bokmål:
 * Swedish: rollkonflikt

title: role conflict


text: aalisakkat

title: aalisakkat


text:
akiliut

Noun

 * 1) charge, fee, payment, price
 * 2) credit card

title: akiliut


text:
Roman Rite

Proper noun

 * 1) The Latin rite used by the Roman Catholic Church.

Translations

 * Chinese:
 * Mandarin: 羅馬禮
 * Finnish: latinalainen riitus
 * Galician: rito romano
 * Hungarian: római rítus, latin rítus
 * Portuguese: rito romano

title: Roman Rite


text:
aqerloq

Noun

 * 1) lead (chemical element)
 * 2) bullet

title: aqerloq


text: Category:kl:Chemical elements

title: Category:kl:Chemical elements


text:
wall kick

Noun

 * 1)  A sideways movement that results from a rotation of a piece that is touching the left or right walls in certain versions of the video game Tetris.
 * 2)  A wall jump.

title: wall kick


text: wall kicks

title: wall kicks


text:
mass flow

Noun

 * 1) The net movement of material matter from one location to another.

Translations

 * Catalan: flux de massa, flux màssic
 * Danish: massestrøm
 * Finnish: massavirtaus
 * German: Massenstrom
 * Greenlandic: aqqusaartuinerup annertussusia
 * Norwegian: massestrøm

title: mass flow


text:
BAT

Noun

 * : a principle applying to regulations on limiting pollutant discharges.

title: BAT


text:
Talk:元旦

Hi, how about a Chinese language entry? The definition should be the same ... However, maybe you can clarify whether this term usually refers to the New Year of the Gregorian calendar or of the East Asian traditional calendar. --

 * Request added at Requested entries (Chinese) (though that page is, unfortunately, largely ignored for years at a time. 71.66.97.228 06:19, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

title: Talk:元旦


text:
Talk:-xié

Certainly not a suffix
There is no way that this word can be considered a suffix. It is simply a noun. A suffix is a very specific term, referring to a word that is joined to the end of another word to modify its meaning. Please do not create pinyin entries for "suffixes" when they are not suffixes. Suffixes are very specific things, such as -ize or -osis or -ish (or Mandarin -zhǔyì), not -shoe or -shoes. There is no such thing as -shoe or -shoes. 71.66.97.228 06:28, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
 * But Mandarin and English are different languages. Ddpy 08:48, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

title: Talk:-xié


text:
μαβής

Etymology
From, ultimately from.

Adjective

 * 1)  azure, navy blue, dark blue
 * 2)  violet, mauve, dark purple
 * 1)  violet, mauve, dark purple
 * 1)  violet, mauve, dark purple
 * 1)  violet, mauve, dark purple

Usage notes
A semantic shift of the colour denoted by the word appears to have occurred in the second half of the 20th century. Earlier (pre-WWII) dictionaries give the meaning exclusively as "dark blue" (cf. Modern ). This is supported by the common use in concurrent literature (see Cavafy quotes). However, starting from the 1950-60s the second meaning of "mauve, dark purple" appears in major dictionaries. According to Sarantakos this is perhaps due to diminishing contact and understanding of the Turkish language, where the term originates, and the semantic influence of phonetically similar (from ). Nowadays, discrepancies are found among major dictionaries; some sources note both meanings, while others only include "mauve, dark purple", indicating the dominance of the latter in colloquial speech.

title: μαβής


text:
apuväline

Noun

 * 1) ancillary, tool, aid, material aid implement or device that serves an ancillary function

title: apuväline


text:
μαβί

Etymology
From, from , ultimately from.

Noun

 * 1)  azure, dark blue
 * 2)  mauve, dark purple
 * 1)  mauve, dark purple

Usage notes
See for a discussion on the semantic shift (from "dark blue" to "mauve") of the this term starting from the second half of the 20th century.

title: μαβί


text:
biskorpiuneq

Noun

 * 1) archbishop

title: biskorpiuneq


text:
Category:kl:Religion

ko:분류:종교(그린란드어) ru:Категория:Религия/kl

title: Category:kl:Religion


text:
blokfløjte

Etymology
Borrowed from.

Noun

 * 1) recorder

Etymology
Borrowed from, from.

Noun

 * 1) recorder

title: blokfløjte


text:
blomkåli

Etymology
Borrowed from, from.

Noun

 * 1) cauliflower

title: blomkåli


text: Category:kl:Vegetables

title: Category:kl:Vegetables


text:
botanikki

Etymology
Borrowed from.

Noun

 * 1) botany

title: botanikki


text: Category:kl:Botany

title: Category:kl:Botany


text: Category:kl:Calendar

title: Category:kl:Calendar


text: Category:kl:Christmas

title: Category:kl:Christmas


text: Category:kl:Christianity

title: Category:kl:Christianity


text: Category:kl:Holidays

title: Category:kl:Holidays


text:
brinti

Etymology
Borrowed from.

Noun

 * 1) hydrogen

title: brinti


text:
bronkitisi

Etymology
Borrowed from.

Noun

 * 1) bronchitis

title: bronkitisi


text: Category:kl:Diseases

title: Category:kl:Diseases


text: Category:kl:Pathology

title: Category:kl:Pathology


text:
Talk:xié

Not an "affix"
"Shoe" is not an affix. It is a noun. 71.66.97.228 07:49, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Usually we don't speak "xié" as a word in Mandarin, please see here]. Ddpy 08:45, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

title: Talk:xié


text:
eroge

Etymology
Borrowed from, a portmanteau of , from.

Noun

 * 1) A visual novel with erotic content.

title: eroge


text:
execratus

Etymology
Perfect participle of

title: execratus


text:
exsecratus

Etymology
Perfect participle of

Participle

 * 1) cursed, execrated
 * 2) detested

title: exsecratus


text: execrata

title: execrata


text: execratum

title: execratum


text: execrati

title: execrati


text: execratae

title: execratae


text: execratorum

title: execratorum


text: execratarum

title: execratarum


text: execrato

title: execrato


text: execratis

title: execratis


text: execratam

title: execratam


text: execratos

title: execratos


text: execratas

title: execratas


text: exsecrata

title: exsecrata


text: exsecratum

title: exsecratum


text: exsecrati

title: exsecrati


text: exsecratae

title: exsecratae


text: exsecratorum

title: exsecratorum


text: exsecratarum

title: exsecratarum


text: exsecrato

title: exsecrato


text: exsecratis

title: exsecratis


text: exsecratam

title: exsecratam


text: exsecratos

title: exsecratos


text: exsecratas

title: exsecratas


text: exsecrate

title: exsecrate


text:
hard drop

Noun

 * 1) A manual downward motion of a piece in the video game Tetris that makes it land immediately (that is, within only one frame).

title: hard drop


text: hard drops

title: hard drops


text:
WAFF

Etymology
Acronym of. Reportedly coined by fans of the television series  (1993-1997). First attested on alt.tv.lois-n-clark as part of a fandom glossary in January 1996.

Noun

 * 1)  A warm and fuzzy feeling, especially in relation to a.
 * 2)  Such feelings collectively.
 * 1)  Such feelings collectively.
 * 1)  Such feelings collectively.
 * 1)  Such feelings collectively.
 * 1)  Such feelings collectively.

title: WAFF


text: WAFFs

title: WAFFs


text:
crack fic

Etymology
Referring to the erratic behaviour of a person on crack cocaine.

Noun

 * 1)  A work of fan fiction that is absurd, surprising or ridiculous, often intentionally.
 * 2)  Such fan fiction collectively.

title: crack fic


text: crack fics

title: crack fics


text:
Curetonian

Adjective

 * 1) of or relating to William Cureton, and specifically the Egyptian manuscripts recognised as Syriac Gospels, edited and published, by the assistant keeper of manuscripts at the British Museum, William Cureton in 1858.

Translations

 * French: curetonien
 * Italian: curetoniano

title: Curetonian


text:
deathfic

Noun

 * 1)  A work of fan fiction centered around the death of a character.
 * 2)  Such fan fiction collectively.

title: deathfic


text: deathfics

title: deathfics


text: xiézi

title: xiézi


text:
捉刀手

Noun

 * 1) ghostwriter usually an anonymous writer who writes a book for a more famous person

title: 捉刀手


text:
ghost piece

Noun

 * 1)  A representation of where a piece will land if it falls without intervention (such as moving it away or rotating it) in the video game Tetris.

title: ghost piece


text: ghost pieces

title: ghost pieces


text: fialae

title: fialae


text: fialarum

title: fialarum


text: fialis

title: fialis


text: fialam

title: fialam


text: fialas

title: fialas


text: fidelissimus

title: fidelissimus


text: fidelissima

title: fidelissima


text: fidelissimum

title: fidelissimum


text: fidelissimi

title: fidelissimi


text: fidelissimae

title: fidelissimae


text: fidelissimorum

title: fidelissimorum


text: fidelissimarum

title: fidelissimarum


text: fidelissimo

title: fidelissimo


text: fidelissimis

title: fidelissimis


text: fidelissimam

title: fidelissimam


text: fidelissimos

title: fidelissimos


text: fidelissimas

title: fidelissimas


text: fidelissime

title: fidelissime


text: finierint

title: finierint


text: fluvii

title: fluvii


text: fluviorum

title: fluviorum


text: fluviis

title: fluviis


text: fluvium

title: fluvium


text: fluvios

title: fluvios


text: fluvie

title: fluvie


text:
rautalanka

Noun

 * 1) iron or steel wire
 * 2) instrumental rock music genre
 * 3)  wireframe

Etymology
From. Akin to 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) wire

title: rautalanka


text:
fornicor

Etymology
.

Verb

 * 1) to fornicate, commit fornication

Descendants

 * Inherited:
 * Old, ,
 * Old, ,
 * Borrowed:
 * Old, ,
 * Borrowed:
 * Borrowed:

title: fornicor


text: fornicatores

title: fornicatores


text: fornicatoris

title: fornicatoris


text: fornicatorum

title: fornicatorum


text: fornicatoribus

title: fornicatoribus


text: fornicatorem

title: fornicatorem


text: fornicaris

title: fornicaris


text: fornicatur

title: fornicatur


text: fornicamur

title: fornicamur


text: fornicamini

title: fornicamini


text: fornicantur

title: fornicantur


text: fornicabor

title: fornicabor


text: fornicaberis

title: fornicaberis


text: fornicabitur

title: fornicabitur


text: fornicabimur

title: fornicabimur


text: fornicabimini

title: fornicabimini


text: fornicabuntur

title: fornicabuntur


text: fornicabar

title: fornicabar


text: fornicabaris

title: fornicabaris


text: fornicabatur

title: fornicabatur


text: fornicabamur

title: fornicabamur


text: fornicabamini

title: fornicabamini


text: fornicabantur

title: fornicabantur


text: fornicer

title: fornicer


text: forniceris

title: forniceris


text: fornicetur

title: fornicetur


text: fornicemur

title: fornicemur


text: fornicemini

title: fornicemini


text: fornicentur

title: fornicentur


text: fornicarer

title: fornicarer


text: fornicareris

title: fornicareris


text: fornicaretur

title: fornicaretur


text: fornicaremur

title: fornicaremur


text: fornicaremini

title: fornicaremini


text: fornicarentur

title: fornicarentur


text: fornicantor

title: fornicantor


text: fornicari

title: fornicari


text:
South African Sign Language

Proper noun

 * 1) A sign language used in South Africa.

title: South African Sign Language


text:
Argentine Sign Language

Proper noun

 * 1) A sign language used in Argentina.

Translations

 * Portuguese: língua de sinais argentina

title: Argentine Sign Language


text: cômoda

title: cômoda


text:
faroeste

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) western

title: faroeste


text:
arrependimento

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) regret
 * 2) repentance
 * 1) repentance

title: arrependimento


text:
negligência

Etymology
Borrowed from, variant of.

Noun

 * 1) negligence

title: negligência


text:
cordilheira

Etymology
Borrowed from, from , , diminutive of (compare 🇨🇬).

Noun

 * 1) mountain range

title: cordilheira


text:
biocombustível

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) biofuel

title: biocombustível


text:
Chilean Sign Language

Proper noun

 * 1) A sign language used in Chile.

title: Chilean Sign Language


text:
Brazilian Sign Language

Proper noun

 * 1) A sign language used in Brazil.

Translations

 * Portuguese: língua brasileira de sinais, LIBRAS

title: Brazilian Sign Language


text:
Colombian Sign Language

Proper noun

 * 1) A sign language used in Colombia.

title: Colombian Sign Language


text:
fornicatrix

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) A female fornicator.

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) fornicator (female), whore
 * 2) prostitute

title: fornicatrix


text:
Hausa Sign Language

Proper noun

 * 1) A sign language used in Nigeria.

title: Hausa Sign Language


text: pofavo

title: pofavo


text:
bolsa de valores

Noun

 * 1) stock exchange

title: bolsa de valores


text: fds

title: fds


text:
estádio

Etymology
, from.

Noun

 * 1) stadium
 * 2)  estadio, Portuguese stade or furlong,

title: estádio


text:
degrau

Etymology
From, from , from , from.

Noun

 * 1) step of a staircase or rung of a ladder
 * 2)  step a distinct part of a progression
 * 1)  step a distinct part of a progression

title: degrau


text:
Honduras Sign Language

Proper noun

 * 1) A sign language used in Honduras.

Translations

 * Honduras Sign Language:

title: Honduras Sign Language


text:
corporação

Noun

 * 1) corporation

title: corporação


text:
Adamorobe Sign Language

Proper noun

 * 1) An indigenous sign language used in Adamorobe, a village of Ghana.

title: Adamorobe Sign Language


title: 9dade


text:
fúria

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) rage, fury
 * 2)  Fury
 * 3)  fury, termagant
 * 1)  fury, termagant

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) rage

title: fúria


text:
perjúrio

Noun

 * 1) perjury

title: perjúrio


text:
distribuição

Etymology

 * influenced by.

Noun

 * 1) distribution

title: distribuição


text:
impressora

Noun

 * 1) printer

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) printer device used to print

title: impressora


text:
escabelo

Etymology
, diminutive form of.

Noun

 * 1) stool
 * 2) footstool
 * 1) footstool

title: escabelo


text:
computador de mesa

Noun

 * 1) desktop computer

Noun

 * 1) desktop computer

title: computador de mesa


text:
deicídio

Noun

 * 1) deicide

title: deicídio


text: fornicatrices

title: fornicatrices


text: fornicatricis

title: fornicatricis


text: fornicatricum

title: fornicatricum


text: fornicatricibus

title: fornicatricibus


text: fornicatricem

title: fornicatricem


text:
aqueduto

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) aqueduct channel built to convey water
 * 2)  the vestibular aqueduct or the cerebral aqueduct

title: aqueduto


text:
Algerian Sign Language

Proper noun

 * 1) A sign language used in Algeria.

title: Algerian Sign Language


text:
Bolivian Sign Language

Proper noun

 * 1) A sign language used in Bolivia.

title: Bolivian Sign Language


text: kbça

title: kbça


text: bjo

title: bjo


text:
sótão

Etymology
From, , from , from. Compare 🇨🇬 and 🇨🇬. Less likely from a Vulgar Latin (whence 🇨🇬), itself also a derivative of.

Noun

 * 1) attic

title: sótão


text:
posto de bombeiros

Noun

 * 1) fire station

title: posto de bombeiros


text:
Ano Novo

Etymology
+

Proper noun

 * 1) New Year's Day

Proper noun

 * 1) New Year's Day January 1st

title: Ano Novo


text:
escada rolante

Noun

 * 1) escalator

title: escada rolante


text:
porão

Etymology 1
From, an early. .

Noun

 * 1)  hold cargo area of a ship or aircraft
 * 2)  basement

title: porão


text: Calcutá

title: Calcutá


text:
preocupação

Etymology
Borrowed from.

Noun

 * 1) worry, concern

title: preocupação


text:
assédio

Etymology
, from Classical.

Noun

 * 1) assault
 * 2) harassment
 * 3) siege

title: assédio


text: furtorum

title: furtorum


text: furtis

title: furtis


text:
biocombustibil

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) biofuel

title: biocombustibil


text:
hyacinthus

Etymology
From, but ultimately from a non-Indo-European Mediterranean language.

Noun

 * 1) iris (plant)
 * 2) sapphire

title: hyacinthus


text: hyacinthi

title: hyacinthi


text: hyacinthorum

title: hyacinthorum


text: hyacintho

title: hyacintho


text: hyacinthis

title: hyacinthis


text: hyacinthum

title: hyacinthum


text: hyacinthos

title: hyacinthos


text:
hyacinthe

Noun

 * 1) hyacinth
 * 2) hematoid quartz
 * 3)  a medicinal preparation which includes hematoid quartz stones and a number of other ingredients

title: hyacinthe


text:
hyacinthinus

Adjective

 * 1)  iris
 * 2)  sapphire
 * 3) hyacinthine

title: hyacinthinus


text: hyacinthina

title: hyacinthina


text: hyacinthinum

title: hyacinthinum


text: hyacinthini

title: hyacinthini


text: hyacinthinae

title: hyacinthinae


text: hyacinthinorum

title: hyacinthinorum


text: hyacinthinarum

title: hyacinthinarum


text: hyacinthino

title: hyacinthino


text: hyacinthinis

title: hyacinthinis


text: hyacinthinam

title: hyacinthinam


text: hyacinthinos

title: hyacinthinos


text: hyacinthinas

title: hyacinthinas


text:
iaspis

Etymology
From, ultimately from an oriental, possibly , loanword. Cognate of modern 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) jasper, a precious stone

Descendants

 * Provençal:
 * Provençal:
 * Provençal:
 * Provençal:
 * Provençal:
 * Provençal:
 * Provençal:
 * Provençal:
 * Provençal:
 * Provençal:
 * Provençal:
 * Provençal:
 * Provençal:
 * Provençal:
 * Provençal:

title: iaspis


text: iaspides

title: iaspides


text: iaspidis

title: iaspidis


text: iaspidum

title: iaspidum


text: iaspidi

title: iaspidi


text: iaspidibus

title: iaspidibus


text: iaspidem

title: iaspidem


text:
iaspide

Etymology
, from, of possibly 🇨🇬 origin.

Noun

 * 1)  chalcedony

title: iaspide


text: idolatrae

title: idolatrae


text: idolatrarum

title: idolatrarum


text: idolatris

title: idolatris


text: idolatram

title: idolatram


text:
jubilæum

Noun

 * 1) jubilee, anniversary

title: jubilæum


text: jubilæet

title: jubilæet


text: jubilæer

title: jubilæer


text: jubilæerne

title: jubilæerne


text: jubilæums

title: jubilæums


text: jubilæets

title: jubilæets


text: jubilæers

title: jubilæers


text: jubilæernes

title: jubilæernes


text:
idolothytus

Adjective

 * 1) idolatrous
 * 2)  idolatry

title: idolothytus


text: idolothyta

title: idolothyta


text: idolothytum

title: idolothytum


text: idolothyti

title: idolothyti


text: idolothytae

title: idolothytae


text: idolothytorum

title: idolothytorum


text: idolothytarum

title: idolothytarum


text: idolothyto

title: idolothyto


text: idolothytis

title: idolothytis


text: idolothytam

title: idolothytam


text: idolothytos

title: idolothytos


text: idolothytas

title: idolothytas


text: idolothyte

title: idolothyte


text:
igneus

Etymology
Derived from.

Adjective

 * 1) fiery, hot, on fire, burning
 * 2) ardent, fervid, vehement

title: igneus


text: igneum

title: igneum


text: igneae

title: igneae


text: igneorum

title: igneorum


text: ignearum

title: ignearum


text: igneis

title: igneis


text: igneam

title: igneam


text: igneos

title: igneos


text: igneas

title: igneas


text:
ignio

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to ignite, set on fire

title: ignio


text: ignit

title: ignit


text: ignimus

title: ignimus


text: ignitis

title: ignitis


text: igniunt

title: igniunt


text: igniam

title: igniam


text: ignies

title: ignies


text: igniet

title: igniet


text: igniemus

title: igniemus


text: ignietis

title: ignietis


text: ignient

title: ignient


text: igniebam

title: igniebam


text: igniebas

title: igniebas


text: igniebat

title: igniebat


text: igniebamus

title: igniebamus


text: igniebatis

title: igniebatis


text: igniebant

title: igniebant


text: ignivi

title: ignivi


text: ignivisti

title: ignivisti


text: ignivit

title: ignivit


text: ignivimus

title: ignivimus


text: ignivistis

title: ignivistis


text: igniverunt

title: igniverunt


text: ignivero

title: ignivero


text: igniveris

title: igniveris


text: igniverit

title: igniverit


text: igniverimus

title: igniverimus


text: igniveritis

title: igniveritis


text: igniverint

title: igniverint


text: igniveram

title: igniveram


text: igniveras

title: igniveras


text: igniverat

title: igniverat


text: igniveramus

title: igniveramus


text: igniveratis

title: igniveratis


text: igniverant

title: igniverant


text: ignior

title: ignior


text: igniris

title: igniris


text: ignitur

title: ignitur


text: ignimur

title: ignimur


text: ignimini

title: ignimini


text: igniuntur

title: igniuntur


text: igniar

title: igniar


text: ignieris

title: ignieris


text: ignietur

title: ignietur


text: igniemur

title: igniemur


text: igniemini

title: igniemini


text: ignientur

title: ignientur


text: igniebar

title: igniebar


text: igniebaris

title: igniebaris


text: igniebatur

title: igniebatur


text: igniebamur

title: igniebamur


text: igniebamini

title: igniebamini


text: igniebantur

title: igniebantur


text: ignias

title: ignias


text: igniat

title: igniat


text: igniamus

title: igniamus


text: igniatis

title: igniatis


text: igniant

title: igniant


text: ignirem

title: ignirem


text: ignires

title: ignires


text: igniret

title: igniret


text: igniremus

title: igniremus


text: igniretis

title: igniretis


text: ignirent

title: ignirent


text: igniverim

title: igniverim


text: ignivissem

title: ignivissem


text: ignivisses

title: ignivisses


text: ignivisset

title: ignivisset


text: ignivissemus

title: ignivissemus


text: ignivissetis

title: ignivissetis


text: ignivissent

title: ignivissent


text: igniaris

title: igniaris


text: igniatur

title: igniatur


text: igniamur

title: igniamur


text: igniamini

title: igniamini


text: igniantur

title: igniantur


text: ignirer

title: ignirer


text: ignireris

title: ignireris


text: igniretur

title: igniretur


text: igniremur

title: igniremur


text: igniremini

title: igniremini


text: ignirentur

title: ignirentur


text: ignitote

title: ignitote


text: igniunto

title: igniunto


text: ignire

title: ignire


text: igniuntor

title: igniuntor


text: ignivisse

title: ignivisse


text: igniri

title: igniri


text:
ignitus

Etymology
Perfect passive participle of.

Participle

 * 1) ignited, set on fire

title: ignitus


text: ignitum

title: ignitum


text: ignitae

title: ignitae


text: ignitorum

title: ignitorum


text: ignitarum

title: ignitarum


text: ignitam

title: ignitam


text: ignitos

title: ignitos


text: ignitas

title: ignitas


text: inpudicus

title: inpudicus


text: inpudica

title: inpudica


text: inpudicum

title: inpudicum


text: inpudici

title: inpudici


text: inpudicae

title: inpudicae


text: inpudicorum

title: inpudicorum


text: inpudicarum

title: inpudicarum


text: inpudico

title: inpudico


text: inpudicis

title: inpudicis


text: inpudicam

title: inpudicam


text: inpudicos

title: inpudicos


text: inpudicas

title: inpudicas


text: inpudice

title: inpudice


text:
inunguo

Etymology
, old form of.

Verb

 * 1) to anoint
 * 2) to spread, apply (an ointment)

Descendants
(via )

title: inunguo


text: inunguis

title: inunguis


text: inunguit

title: inunguit


text: inunguimus

title: inunguimus


text: inunguitis

title: inunguitis


text: inunguunt

title: inunguunt


text: inunguam

title: inunguam


text: inungues

title: inungues


text: inunguet

title: inunguet


text: inunguemus

title: inunguemus


text: inunguetis

title: inunguetis


text: inunguent

title: inunguent


text: inunguebam

title: inunguebam


text: inunguebas

title: inunguebas


text: inunguebat

title: inunguebat


text: inunguebamus

title: inunguebamus


text: inunguebatis

title: inunguebatis


text: inunguebant

title: inunguebant


text: inunxi

title: inunxi


text: inunxisti

title: inunxisti


text: inunxit

title: inunxit


text: inunximus

title: inunximus


text: inunxistis

title: inunxistis


text: inunxerunt

title: inunxerunt


text: inunxero

title: inunxero


text: inunxeris

title: inunxeris


text: inunxerit

title: inunxerit


text: inunxerimus

title: inunxerimus


text: inunxeritis

title: inunxeritis


text: inunxerint

title: inunxerint


text: inunxeram

title: inunxeram


text: inunxeras

title: inunxeras


text: inunxerat

title: inunxerat


text: inunxeramus

title: inunxeramus


text: inunxeratis

title: inunxeratis


text: inunxerant

title: inunxerant


text: inunguor

title: inunguor


text: inungueris

title: inungueris


text: inunguitur

title: inunguitur


text: inunguimur

title: inunguimur


text: inunguimini

title: inunguimini


text: inunguuntur

title: inunguuntur


text: inunguar

title: inunguar


text: inunguetur

title: inunguetur


text: inunguemur

title: inunguemur


text: inunguemini

title: inunguemini


text: inunguentur

title: inunguentur


text: inunguebar

title: inunguebar


text: inunguebaris

title: inunguebaris


text: inunguebatur

title: inunguebatur


text: inunguebamur

title: inunguebamur


text: inunguebamini

title: inunguebamini


text: inunguebantur

title: inunguebantur


text: inunguas

title: inunguas


text: inunguat

title: inunguat


text: inunguamus

title: inunguamus


text: inunguatis

title: inunguatis


text: inunguant

title: inunguant


text: inunguerem

title: inunguerem


text: inungueres

title: inungueres


text: inungueret

title: inungueret


text: inungueremus

title: inungueremus


text: inungueretis

title: inungueretis


text: inunguerent

title: inunguerent


text: inunxerim

title: inunxerim


text: inunxissem

title: inunxissem


text: inunxisses

title: inunxisses


text: inunxisset

title: inunxisset


text: inunxissemus

title: inunxissemus


text: inunxissetis

title: inunxissetis


text: inunxissent

title: inunxissent


text: inunguaris

title: inunguaris


text: inunguatur

title: inunguatur


text: inunguamur

title: inunguamur


text: inunguamini

title: inunguamini


text: inunguantur

title: inunguantur


text: inunguerer

title: inunguerer


text: inunguereris

title: inunguereris


text: inungueretur

title: inungueretur


text: inungueremur

title: inungueremur


text: inungueremini

title: inungueremini


text: inunguerentur

title: inunguerentur


text: inungue

title: inungue


text: inunguito

title: inunguito


text: inunguite

title: inunguite


text: inunguitote

title: inunguitote


text: inunguunto

title: inunguunto


text: inunguere

title: inunguere


text: inunguitor

title: inunguitor


text: inunguuntor

title: inunguuntor


text: inunxisse

title: inunxisse


text: inungui

title: inungui


text:
Galia

Etymology
Definite form of ; added on.

Proper noun

 * 1) France
 * 1) France

Proper noun

 * 1) Gaul

Etymology
.

Proper noun

 * 1)  Gaul

Proper noun

 * 1) Gaul

Etymology
From.

Proper noun

 * 1) Gaul

title: Galia


text: iucundat

title: iucundat


text: iucundamus

title: iucundamus


text: iucundatis

title: iucundatis


text: iucundant

title: iucundant


text: iucundabo

title: iucundabo


text: iucundabis

title: iucundabis


text: iucundabit

title: iucundabit


text: iucundabimus

title: iucundabimus


text: iucundabitis

title: iucundabitis


text: iucundabunt

title: iucundabunt


text: iucundabam

title: iucundabam


text: iucundabas

title: iucundabas


text: iucundabat

title: iucundabat


text: iucundabamus

title: iucundabamus


text: iucundabatis

title: iucundabatis


text: iucundabant

title: iucundabant


text: iucundavi

title: iucundavi


text: iucundavisti

title: iucundavisti


text: iucundavit

title: iucundavit


text: iucundavimus

title: iucundavimus


text: iucundavistis

title: iucundavistis


text: iucundaverunt

title: iucundaverunt


text: iucundavero

title: iucundavero


text: iucundaveris

title: iucundaveris


text: iucundaverit

title: iucundaverit


text: iucundaverimus

title: iucundaverimus


text: iucundaveritis

title: iucundaveritis


text: iucundaverint

title: iucundaverint


text: iucundaveram

title: iucundaveram


text: iucundaveras

title: iucundaveras


text: iucundaverat

title: iucundaverat


text: iucundaveramus

title: iucundaveramus


text: iucundaveratis

title: iucundaveratis


text: iucundaverant

title: iucundaverant


text:
iucundor

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to be pleased or delighted

title: iucundor


text: iucundaris

title: iucundaris


text: iucundatur

title: iucundatur


text: iucundamur

title: iucundamur


text: iucundamini

title: iucundamini


text: iucundantur

title: iucundantur


text: iucundabor

title: iucundabor


text: iucundaberis

title: iucundaberis


text: iucundabitur

title: iucundabitur


text: iucundabimur

title: iucundabimur


text: iucundabimini

title: iucundabimini


text: iucundabuntur

title: iucundabuntur


text: iucundabar

title: iucundabar


text: iucundabaris

title: iucundabaris


text: iucundabatur

title: iucundabatur


text: iucundabamur

title: iucundabamur


text: iucundabamini

title: iucundabamini


text: iucundabantur

title: iucundabantur


text: iucundem

title: iucundem


text: iucundes

title: iucundes


text: iucundet

title: iucundet


text: iucundemus

title: iucundemus


text: iucundetis

title: iucundetis


text: iucundent

title: iucundent


text: iucundarem

title: iucundarem


text: iucundares

title: iucundares


text: iucundaret

title: iucundaret


text: iucundaremus

title: iucundaremus


text: iucundaretis

title: iucundaretis


text: iucundarent

title: iucundarent


text: iucundaverim

title: iucundaverim


text: iucundavissem

title: iucundavissem


text: iucundavisses

title: iucundavisses


text: iucundavisset

title: iucundavisset


text: iucundavissemus

title: iucundavissemus


text: iucundavissetis

title: iucundavissetis


text: iucundavissent

title: iucundavissent


text: iucunder

title: iucunder


text: iucunderis

title: iucunderis


text: iucundetur

title: iucundetur


text: iucundemur

title: iucundemur


text: iucundemini

title: iucundemini


text: iucundentur

title: iucundentur


text: iucundarer

title: iucundarer


text: iucundareris

title: iucundareris


text: iucundaretur

title: iucundaretur


text: iucundaremur

title: iucundaremur


text: iucundaremini

title: iucundaremini


text: iucundarentur

title: iucundarentur


text: iucundato

title: iucundato


text: iucundate

title: iucundate


text: iucundatote

title: iucundatote


text: iucundanto

title: iucundanto


text: iucundare

title: iucundare


text: iucundator

title: iucundator


text: iucundantor

title: iucundantor


text: iucundavisse

title: iucundavisse


text: iucundari

title: iucundari


text: laverunt

title: laverunt


text:
redescoperire

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) rediscovery

title: redescoperire


text: mamillae

title: mamillae


text: mamillarum

title: mamillarum


text: mamillis

title: mamillis


text: mamillam

title: mamillam


text: mamillas

title: mamillas


text: minsta

title: minsta


text:
matutinus

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1)  morning
 * 2) early

title: matutinus


text: matutina

title: matutina


text:
matutinum

Etymology
Shortening of.

Noun

 * 1) the morning
 * 2)  matins

title: matutinum


text: matutini

title: matutini


text: matutinae

title: matutinae


text: matutinorum

title: matutinorum


text: matutinarum

title: matutinarum


text: matutinis

title: matutinis


text: matutinam

title: matutinam


text: matutinos

title: matutinos


text: matutinas

title: matutinas


text:
matutine

Etymology
From, from , from ; related to 🇨🇬 (compare ).

Adjective

 * 1) Of or relating to early morning; occurring in the early morning; matutinal.
 * 2) * 1833, Captain Mundy, Pen and Pencil Sketches, from the Journal of a Tour in India, quoted in 1833, Recent Travels in Upper India, The Edinburgh Review, Or Critical Journal, Volume 57, page 362,
 * During a residence of nearly two years in Switzerland, the first object that my eyes opened upon every morning was the snow-clad summit of Mount Blanc; and I thought that a glorious sight. But the glaciers that now form, next to the Omnipotent Being who created them, my first objects of matutine contemplation, present a battalion of icy pinnacles, amongst which Mount Blanc, with its pitiful fifteen thousand feet, would scarcely be admitted in the rear rank!
 * 1)  Before the sun (of the rising of a planet or star); that rises before the sun (of a planet or star).
 * 2) * 1817, Ebenezer Sibly, The New and Complete Illustration of the Celestial Science of Astrology, Volume 2, Revised Edition, 1822 printing, page 1031,
 * If, at the time of the matutine ſetting of the Dolphin, there be ſhowers, there will be none at the riſing of Arcturus.The matutine riſing of the greater Dog begetteth heat, troubleth the ſeas, and changeth all things.

title: matutine


text:
sølvbryllup

Etymology
From. Compare 🇨🇬 and 🇨🇬.

Pronunciation

 * or

Noun

 * 1) silver wedding
 * 2)  silver jubilee

title: sølvbryllup


text: sølvbrylluppet

title: sølvbrylluppet


text: sølvbryllupper

title: sølvbryllupper


text: sølvbryllupperne

title: sølvbryllupperne


text: sølvbryllups

title: sølvbryllups


text: sølvbrylluppets

title: sølvbrylluppets


text: sølvbrylluppers

title: sølvbrylluppers


text: sølvbrylluppernes

title: sølvbrylluppernes


text:
mångenstädes

Etymology
From, equivalent to

Adverb

 * 1) in many places

title: mångenstädes


text: köpmän

title: köpmän


text:
vielerorts

Etymology
From, with adverbial ; compare ,.

Adverb

 * 1) in many places

title: vielerorts


text:
mensus

Etymology
Perfect active participle of. Its formation with /ns/ is irregular, probably due to analogy with (underlyingly /pend-tus/).

Participle

 * 1) measured, estimated
 * 2) distributed

title: mensus


text: mensum

title: mensum


text: mensorum

title: mensorum


text:
köpman

Etymology
, like German

Noun

 * 1) a merchant, a shopowner, a businessman

title: köpman


text: milies

title: milies


text:
Crucea Roșie

Proper noun

 * 1) the Red Cross

title: Crucea Roșie


text:
klagomål

Noun

 * 1) a complaint

title: klagomål


text:
ingalunda

Adverb

 * 1) not at all, not in any way

title: ingalunda


text:
miserabilis

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) pitiable, miserable, deplorable, lamentable, wretched, sad, pitiful, pathetic

title: miserabilis


text:
-lunda

Etymology
From the genitive plural of. . Compare and. See also 🇨🇬.

Suffix

 * 1) -wise; making an adverb

title: -lunda


text: miserabiles

title: miserabiles


text: miserabilia

title: miserabilia


text: miserabilium

title: miserabilium


text: miserabilibus

title: miserabilibus


text: miserabilem

title: miserabilem


text: Category:Swedish terms suffixed with -lunda


text: molarium

title: molarium


text: molaribus

title: molaribus


text: molarem

title: molarem


text:
-städes

Suffix

 * 1)  -place, -where; making an adverb; cognate with the English stead

title: -städes


text: Category:Swedish terms suffixed with -städes


text:
odoramentum

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) aromatic perfume, spice or balsam

title: odoramentum


text: odoramenta

title: odoramenta


text: odoramenti

title: odoramenti


text: odoramentorum

title: odoramentorum


text: odoramento

title: odoramento


text: odoramentis

title: odoramentis


text:
omnipotentia

Etymology 1
From.

Noun

 * 1) omnipotence (almighty power)

title: omnipotentia


text: omnipotentis

title: omnipotentis


text: omnipotentium

title: omnipotentium


text:
omnipotenti

Etymology
.

Adjective

 * 1) omnipotent

title: omnipotenti


text: omnipotentibus

title: omnipotentibus


text: omnipotentem

title: omnipotentem


text:
ifrågavarande

Adjective

 * 1) this, current, present; the one being in question

title: ifrågavarande


text: göres

title: göres


text: orichalca

title: orichalca


text: orichalci

title: orichalci


text: orichalcorum

title: orichalcorum


text: orichalco

title: orichalco


text: orichalcis

title: orichalcis


text: fordras

title: fordras


text: folkskolan

title: folkskolan


text:
folkskola

Noun

 * 1) a public school

title: folkskola


text:
erkänt

Adverb

 * 1) admittedly, recognized as

title: erkänt


text:
particeps

Etymology 1
From. . See.

Adjective

 * 1) sharing, partaking, participant, participating

Etymology 2
Substantivation of the latter adjective.

Noun

 * 1) a participant, someone who has his share in (something)

title: particeps


text: participibus

title: participibus


text:
erkänd

Adjective

 * 1) renowned, recognized

title: erkänd


text: emigrationsfrågan

title: emigrationsfrågan


text:
parturiens

Etymology
Present participle of.

Participle

 * 1) giving birth

title: parturiens


text: parturientes

title: parturientes


text: parturientia

title: parturientia


text: parturientis

title: parturientis


text: parturientium

title: parturientium


text: parturienti

title: parturienti


text: parturientibus

title: parturientibus


text: parturientem

title: parturientem


text:
emigrationsfråga

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) the emigration issue (concerning the emigration of 1 million Swedes to North America in 1840-1920)

title: emigrationsfråga


text:
perlucidus

Adjective

 * 1) transparent, pellucid

title: perlucidus


text: perlucida

title: perlucida


text: perlucidum

title: perlucidum


text: perlucidi

title: perlucidi


text: perlucidae

title: perlucidae


text: perlucidorum

title: perlucidorum


text: perlucidarum

title: perlucidarum


text: perlucido

title: perlucido


text: perlucidis

title: perlucidis


text: perlucidam

title: perlucidam


text: perlucidos

title: perlucidos


text: perlucidas

title: perlucidas


text: perlucide

title: perlucide


text: ansett

title: ansett


text: Template:el-decl-adj-ης-ης-ες

title: Template:el-decl-adj-ης-ης-ες


text:
ansedd

Adjective

 * 1) (highly) regarded
 * 2)  respected, highly regarded
 * 3)  poorly regarded

title: ansedd


text:
tagas

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) hardness

Noun

 * 1) ooze; leakage
 * 2) slow flow, leak, or drip
 * 1) slow flow, leak, or drip

title: tagas


text:
potiono

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to give to drink

title: potiono


text: potionas

title: potionas


text: potionat

title: potionat


text: potionamus

title: potionamus


text: potionatis

title: potionatis


text: potionant

title: potionant


text: potionabo

title: potionabo


text: potionabis

title: potionabis


text: potionabit

title: potionabit


text: potionabimus

title: potionabimus


text: potionabitis

title: potionabitis


text: potionabunt

title: potionabunt


text: potionabam

title: potionabam


text: potionabas

title: potionabas


text: potionabat

title: potionabat


text: potionabamus

title: potionabamus


text: potionabatis

title: potionabatis


text: potionabant

title: potionabant


text: potionavi

title: potionavi


text: potionavisti

title: potionavisti


text: potionavit

title: potionavit


text: potionavimus

title: potionavimus


text: potionavistis

title: potionavistis


text: potionaverunt

title: potionaverunt


text: potionavero

title: potionavero


text: potionaveris

title: potionaveris


text: potionaverit

title: potionaverit


text: potionaverimus

title: potionaverimus


text: potionaveritis

title: potionaveritis


text: potionaverint

title: potionaverint


text: potionaveram

title: potionaveram


text: potionaveras

title: potionaveras


text: potionaverat

title: potionaverat


text: potionaveramus

title: potionaveramus


text: potionaveratis

title: potionaveratis


text: potionaverant

title: potionaverant


text: potionor

title: potionor


text: potionaris

title: potionaris


text: potionatur

title: potionatur


text: potionamur

title: potionamur


text: potionamini

title: potionamini


text: potionantur

title: potionantur


text: potionabor

title: potionabor


text: potionaberis

title: potionaberis


text: potionabitur

title: potionabitur


text: potionabimur

title: potionabimur


text: potionabimini

title: potionabimini


text: potionabuntur

title: potionabuntur


text: potionabar

title: potionabar


text: potionabaris

title: potionabaris


text: potionabatur

title: potionabatur


text: potionabamur

title: potionabamur


text: potionabamini

title: potionabamini


text: potionabantur

title: potionabantur


text: potionet

title: potionet


text: potionemus

title: potionemus


text: potionetis

title: potionetis


text: potionent

title: potionent


text: potionarem

title: potionarem


text: potionares

title: potionares


text: potionaret

title: potionaret


text: potionaremus

title: potionaremus


text: potionaretis

title: potionaretis


text: potionarent

title: potionarent


text: potionaverim

title: potionaverim


text: potionavissem

title: potionavissem


text: potionavisses

title: potionavisses


text: potionavisset

title: potionavisset


text: potionavissemus

title: potionavissemus


text: potionavissetis

title: potionavissetis


text: potionavissent

title: potionavissent


text:
potioner

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) One who makes potions.

title: potioner


text: potioneris

title: potioneris


text: potionetur

title: potionetur


text: potionemur

title: potionemur


text: potionemini

title: potionemini


text: potionentur

title: potionentur


text: potionarer

title: potionarer


text: potionareris

title: potionareris


text: potionaretur

title: potionaretur


text: potionaremur

title: potionaremur


text: potionaremini

title: potionaremini


text: potionarentur

title: potionarentur


text: potiona

title: potiona


text: potionato

title: potionato


text: potionate

title: potionate


text: potionatote

title: potionatote


text: potionanto

title: potionanto


text: potionare

title: potionare


text: potionator

title: potionator


text: potionantor

title: potionantor


text: potionavisse

title: potionavisse


text: potionari

title: potionari


text:
stundom

Etymology
Dative plural of

Adverb

 * 1)  sometimes, every once in a while, now and then

Etymology
Dative plural of

Adverb

 * 1) sometimes, now and then, at times

Etymology
Dative plural of

Adverb

 * 1) sometimes, now and then, at times

Adverb

 * 1) sometimes, in between

title: stundom


text: övervann

title: övervann


text:
övervinna

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to defeat, to conquer

title: övervinna


text:
prostitutio

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) prostitution
 * 2) dishonoring, profaning
 * 1) dishonoring, profaning
 * 1) dishonoring, profaning

title: prostitutio


text: prostitutiones

title: prostitutiones


text: prostitutionis

title: prostitutionis


text: prostitutionum

title: prostitutionum


text: prostitutioni

title: prostitutioni


text: prostitutionibus

title: prostitutionibus


text: prostitutionem

title: prostitutionem


text: prostitutione

title: prostitutione


text: pungis

title: pungis


text:
pungit

Noun

 * 1)  harelip

title: pungit


text: pungimus

title: pungimus


text: pungitis

title: pungitis


text: pungunt

title: pungunt


text: pungam

title: pungam


text: punges

title: punges


text: punget

title: punget


text: pungemus

title: pungemus


text: pungetis

title: pungetis


text: pungebam

title: pungebam


text: pungebas

title: pungebas


text: pungebat

title: pungebat


text: pungebamus

title: pungebamus


text: pungebatis

title: pungebatis


text: pungebant

title: pungebant


text: pupugi

title: pupugi


text: pupugisti

title: pupugisti


text: pupugit

title: pupugit


text: pupugimus

title: pupugimus


text: pupugistis

title: pupugistis


text: pupugerunt

title: pupugerunt


text: pupugero

title: pupugero


text: pupugeris

title: pupugeris


text: pupugerit

title: pupugerit


text: pupugerimus

title: pupugerimus


text: pupugeritis

title: pupugeritis


text: pupugerint

title: pupugerint


text: pupugeram

title: pupugeram


text: pupugeras

title: pupugeras


text: pupugerat

title: pupugerat


text: pupugeramus

title: pupugeramus


text: pupugeratis

title: pupugeratis


text: pupugerant

title: pupugerant


text: pungor

title: pungor


text: pungeris

title: pungeris


text: pungitur

title: pungitur


text: pungimur

title: pungimur


text: pungimini

title: pungimini


text: punguntur

title: punguntur


text: pungetur

title: pungetur


text: pungemur

title: pungemur


text: pungemini

title: pungemini


text: pungentur

title: pungentur


text: pungebar

title: pungebar


text: pungebaris

title: pungebaris


text: pungebatur

title: pungebatur


text: pungebamur

title: pungebamur


text: pungebamini

title: pungebamini


text: pungebantur

title: pungebantur


text:
pungas

Adjective

 * 1) confused and half-asleep after waking up

title: pungas


text:
pungat

Adjective

 * 1) with one eye half-closed from birth

title: pungat


text: pungamus

title: pungamus


text: pungatis

title: pungatis


text: pungant

title: pungant


text: pungerem

title: pungerem


text: pungeres

title: pungeres


text: pungeret

title: pungeret


text: pungeremus

title: pungeremus


text: pungeretis

title: pungeretis


text: pungerent

title: pungerent


text: pupugerim

title: pupugerim


text: pupugissem

title: pupugissem


text: pupugisses

title: pupugisses


text: pupugisset

title: pupugisset


text: pupugissemus

title: pupugissemus


text: pupugissetis

title: pupugissetis


text: pupugissent

title: pupugissent


text: pungaris

title: pungaris


text: pungatur

title: pungatur


text: pungamur

title: pungamur


text: pungamini

title: pungamini


text: pungantur

title: pungantur


text: pungerer

title: pungerer


text: pungereris

title: pungereris


text: pungeretur

title: pungeretur


text: pungeremur

title: pungeremur


text: pungeremini

title: pungeremini


text: pungerentur

title: pungerentur


text: pungito

title: pungito


text: pungite

title: pungite


text: pungitote

title: pungitote


text: pungunto

title: pungunto


text: pungitor

title: pungitor


text: punguntor

title: punguntor


text: pupugisse

title: pupugisse


text:
Whiggery

Noun

 * 1) Support for whiggish attitudes.

title: Whiggery


text:
reductibilitate

Etymology
. Equivalent to.

Noun

 * 1) reducibility

title: reductibilitate


text:
pòcaid-achlais

Noun

 * 1) inside breast pocket

title: pòcaid-achlais


text:
pòcaid-bhroillich

Noun

 * 1) breast pocket

Related terms

 * - inside breast pocket

title: pòcaid-bhroillich


text:
suveranitate

Etymology
. Equivalent to.

Noun

 * 1) sovereignty

title: suveranitate


text: pòcaide-broillich

title: pòcaide-broillich


text: pòcaidean-brollich

title: pòcaidean-brollich


text: pòcaidean-achlais

title: pòcaidean-achlais


text: pòcaid-broillich

title: pòcaid-broillich


text: achlaise

title: achlaise