text:
Philippe

Philippe is a masculine given name, cognate to Philip. It may refer to:

 * Philippe of Belgium (born 1960), King of the Belgians (2013–present)
 * Philippe (footballer) (born 2000), Brazilian footballer
 * Prince Philippe, Count of Flanders, father to Albert I of Belgium
 * Philippe d'Orléans (disambiguation), multiple people
 * Philippe A. Autexier (1954–1998), French music historian
 * Philippe Blain, French volleyball player and coach
 * Philippe Najib Boulos (1902–1979), Lebanese lawyer and politician
 * Philippe Coutinho, Brazilian footballer
 * Philippe Daverio (1949–2020), Italian art historian
 * Philippe Dubuisson-Lebon, Canadian football player
 * Philippe Ginestet (born 1954), French billionaire businessman, founder of GiFi
 * Philippe Gilbert, Belgian bicycle racer
 * Philippe Noiret, French actor
 * Philippe Petit, French performer and tightrope artist
 * Philippe Petitcolin (born 1952/53), French businessman, CEO of Safran
 * Philippe Russo, French singer
 * Philippe Sella, French rugby player
 * Philippe Senderos, Swiss footballer
 * Philippe Swan, Belgian singer-songwriter

title: Philippe


text:
User:DouglasH

My name is Douglas John Hyde. I am from Seattle, of Irish descent (apparently I am distantly related to some Irish president.) I am currently working in Dublin, Ireland as a computer program consultant.

My interests are: computers. history. science fiction. international politics.

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: User:DouglasH


text:
Micro-

Micro (Greek letter μ, mu, non-italic) is a unit prefix in the metric system denoting a factor of 10−6 (one millionth). Confirmed in 1960, the prefix comes from the Greek μικρός (mikrós), meaning "small".

It is the only SI prefix which uses a character not from the Latin alphabet. In Unicode, the symbol is represented by or the legacy symbol. The prefix "mc" is commonly used in healthcare or when the character "μ" is not available; for example, "mcg" commonly denotes a microgram. The letter "u" is sometimes used instead of "μ" when non-Latin characters are not available.

Examples

 * Typical bacteria are 1 to 10 micrometer (1–10 μm) in diameter.
 * Eukaryotic cells are typically 10 to 100 micrometers in diameter.

Symbol encoding in character sets
The official symbol for the SI prefix micro is a Greek lowercase mu (μ). For reasons stemming from its design, Unicode has two different character codes for the letter, with slightly different appearance in some fonts, although most fonts use the same glyph. is in the "Latin-1 Supplement" range identical to ISO/IEC 8859-1 (since 1987), residing at this code point also in DEC MCS (since 1983) and ECMA-94 (since 1985). is in the Greek range. According to The Unicode Consortium, the Greek letter character is preferred, but implementations must recognize the micro sign as well, for compatibility with legacy character sets. This distinction also occurs in some legacy code pages, notably Windows-1253.

In circumstances in which only the Latin alphabet is available, ISO 2955 (since 1974, withdrawn 2001 ), DIN 66030 (since 1980 ) and BS 6430 (since 1983) allow the prefix   to be substituted by the letter   (or even , if lowercase letters are not available), as, for example, in   for  , or   for  , or in the common abbreviation   for microcontroller (μC). Similarly, capacitor values according to the RKM code defined in IEC 60062 (since 1952) can be written as  (or  ) instead of   if the Greek letter   is not available.

The CJK Compatibility block contains square forms of some Japanese katakana measure and currency units. corresponds to マイクロ maikuro.

Other abbreviating conventions
In some health care institutions, house rules deprecate the standard symbol for microgram, "μg", in prescribing or chart recording, because of the risk of giving an incorrect dose because of the misreading of poor handwriting. The two alternatives are to abbreviate as "mcg" or to write out "microgram" in full (see also List of abbreviations used in medical prescriptions). The alternative abbreviation may be ambiguous in rare circumstances in that mcg could also be read as a micrigram, i.e. 10−14 g; however the prefix micri is not standard, nor widely known, and is considered obsolete. This deprecation, focused on avoiding incorrect dosing in contexts where handwriting is often present, does not extend to all health-care contexts and institutions (for example, some clinical laboratories' reports adhere to it, whereas others do not ), and in physical sciences research, "μg" remains the sole official abbreviation.

In medical data exchange according to the Health Level 7 (HL7) standard, the μ can be replaced by u as well.

title: Micro-


text:
Talk:Princess Joséphine-Charlotte of Belgium

Untitled
Do we usually use titles like "Her Royal Highness" in the body of articles? Tokerboy
 * And shouldn't it be at Josphine-Charlotte of Belgium too? Tokerboy
 * One might argue for Josephine-Charlotte of Belgium....  -- Someone else 01:07 Jan 14, 2003 (UTC)

 * I thought it was those crazy "more-than-one-"e"-in-first-name-hating" Belgians being silly. Tokerboy 01:12 Jan 14, 2003 (UTC) (gonna remove the HRHs to, according to what appears to be consensus)
 * I think actually it was a problem with an accented 'e'.... diacritical marks in titles are asking for trouble. I sympathize with the HRH, Princess etc removal, but I've given up suggesting to 64.228.30.184 that they conform to Wikipedia convention... 64etc seems uninterested and insists on using them, even in article titles/links. They're all over the Belgian stuff.  Blessings upon your quest, Tokerboy -- Someone else 01:21 Jan 14, 2003 (UTC)


text:
Talk:Truly, Madly, Deeply (film)

Merge
I agree that the two articles should be merged. --Supernumerary 05:03, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I agree - keep this page and delete the other version. How did we end up with two separate entries anyway?! --Thoughtcat 07:53, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Before the naming conventions were standardised, there was a split over whether film or movie should be used to disambiguate. I've run across one other situation like this.--Supernumerary 23:26, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

I went ahead and did the merger. I blended the two plot sections together and added in the reception section. Everything else from Truly Madly Deeply (movie) was scrapped.--Supernumerary 01:25, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

 * Good stuff. The correct title though (according to the IMDb entry to which this article links) is "Truly Madly Deeply" (i.e. without the commas). At the moment though if you search for the title without the commas you go straight to the song. Should this be clarified (with a redirect)? --Thoughtcat 13:10, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

DVD unavailable?
It seems as if the DVD has little or no availability (also not on Netflix, as a DVD or streamed). I've Googled for a reason, but have found none. Any ideas that could lead to this info being addable to the article? -- Dan Griscom (talk) 03:12, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

 * I asked in a high street shop and apparently dvds haven't been available in shops in the UK since 2008. The advisor I spoke to said the licence has probably been withdrawn /expired / not re-negotiated. Span (talk) 11:32, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

 * I was able to buy a new Region 1 DVD from a well known online retailer in January, 2023. Frank Lynch (talk) 12:02, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Release
I think you are aware of Verifiability. Your claim that this film is shown in tv first is in fact wrong and there IS a source to prove this - have a look at the entry of the official site of British Film Institute http://collections-search.bfi.org.uk/web/Details/ChoiceFilmWorks/150360639. So don't insist for this wrong edit anymore. -- MovieFex (talk) 18:39, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I think you are aware that BBC TV productions often get a one time tgheastrical showing - Just see all the Dr Who episodes. Does that mean we change them to film categories? MarnetteD|Talk 19:05, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
 * You do know that the link you provided does not indicate whether it was in a theatre or TV on August 16th and that the date comes months after the other two dates in the infobox. MarnetteD|Talk 19:07, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
 * August is later than May, isn't it? So your claim "It aired on TV before it was shown in theaters" is wrong. Theatrical release in USA was 1991-05-03 and in UK 1991-08-16. And if you have a look at the BFI website click on "Release/TV" (link on the left side) there you can see it aired 1992-03-01 in tv. So it is absolutely clear. -- MovieFex (talk) 19:19, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Truly Madly Deeply which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 19:31, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:Truly, Madly, Deeply (film)


text:
Talk:Child development (disambiguation)

This page needs info about physical development as well as cognitive.

Newborns are very different than infants. Can we break the redirect from newborn to a separate article on newborns? Samw

no offense but....
this has to be the sloppiest wikipedia i've come across. needs a great deal of work. i won't have time until autumn to tackle it. Kingturtle 03:48, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

 * I agree, it needs work. What I'd like to see changed is the headings for each section. I think it would work best with each age group (1-4 months, 4-8 months, etc..) in large heading and then subtitles for motor and physical development. I could give it a start but help would be ace. Eiffelle 23:16, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * It would really also be nice for it to be in prose rather than list form, and to have an intro, etc. Sources would be good also, I know there are a lot out there.  I'm working on the article on Toys, hoping to bring it up to good or even featured article standard, and considering the considerable roll toys play in child development I intended to link to this article via a  template, but if I do manage to get that up to featured status, I'm not sure I'll want to use such a visable template to link to such a mess of an important psycological topic. ~ ONUnicorn (Talk / Contribs) 20:59, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Needs alot of work, for example, under age 4 it says may be able to write a few letters, most children can write their name at 4 and they are beginning to understand letter sounds. The web site in the external links is not an "offical" site surely a government page or a recognised body would be better?  bit of a poor article in my opinion.
 * I propose that this article references broader concepts and understandings related to 'child development' and that a related page for child development stages is created to house all the stage specific information, which I beleive is highly useful, but maybe less relevant initially when looking to reference child development as a topic as a whole. --Evolve2k 12:30, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Worldview
I have removed the "limited geographic scope" tags because they are unexplained. If you think they are deserved, then please feeel free to restore them -- but please also provide a detailed explanation of your concerns right here on this page, so that other editors can figure out what needs to be addressed. WhatamIdoing (talk) 20:07, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

title: Talk:Child development (disambiguation)