text:
User talk:Gaz~enwiki

Photo Request
Hi Gaz, I am currently looking for an image of the Gateway Bridge Brisbane, and I stumbled accross your picture on Wikipedia. I would really like this image in a high res format that is suitable for print. If possible could you email me a copy of this? Falcon1978 06:48, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

 * What end use do plan for the image? Commercial/personal/etc? - Gaz 15:16, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

Archive 1

Well just to tell you thanks for your comments on Featured_pictures_candidates --Chmouel Boudjnah

I've replied to you over at my talk page - Chrism 17:51, 18 Feb 2004 (UTC)

image syntax
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia%3AExtended_image_syntax

so you can stop posting 2 images, and stop ruining names with pixel information esaily obtainable from the file itself.

APEC
I just went by how their official website listed these countries. They used the conventional short form for all of them except for Brunei, China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan. This especially matters for the latter two since the name they used (especially in the case of "Chinese Taipei") would determine whether they would allowed to become a member. The "Republic of China" would never be allowed to become a member - only Chinese Taipei would. Our footer needs to reflect that. And since listed the names used by APEC for Hong Kong and the two Chinas, we might as well do so for Brunei, for consistency sake. --Jiang 18:59, 26 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Spotted Quoll
As I see, you are directly responsible for this article having been created — I was nonplussed to see Adam Carr, whose interests seem to be more in the political articles, has written it. Good call!

But now... we need a picture of the beast, of course! I haven't found any non-copyrighted ones on the web: how about a weekend trip to Tasmania and donating Wikipedia a handful of nice pictures of the Spotted Quoll?

(Only half joking — my experiences with asking for permission for other pictures have been so far unsuccessful, so I fear this would actually be the easiest way to get one :-)

Lupo 19:40, 2 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Hi Gaz. Looks fine as-is to me. But I'm brain-dead today. I (perhaps rather foolishly) volunteered to code the HTML of a reasonably extensive web page for a landcare group recently. Haven't done any serious HTML for quite a while. Very rusty. Been working on it most of the weekend. Eyes falling out, brain fuzzy, could get quite serious about a beer or two, some gentle excercise, and some sleep. Adrian User:Apingstone is the main man for images. But you already know that. Best. Tannin (Oh, and I put "Australia" rather than somewhere more specific because I have taken to travelling a lot lately. Next month - I hope - WA. Only state I've never been to. But the indecision is killing me. It's been raining up the Cooper and for he first time in a long while the Channel Country wetlands will be in full of life and growth. I shouldn't miss that opportunity. But I fear it's not practicable without 4WD.)

 * Hi Gaz,
 * I'm just wondering what exposure/aperture/settings you used for http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:BrisbaneByNight2004.jpg
 * Another Gaz

DSCN4786.JPG (aka BrisbaneByNight2004.jpg) CAMERA      : E5700V1.1 METERING    : MATRIX MODE        : M SHUTTER      : 8.00sec APERTURE    : F3.1 EXP +/-     : 0.0 FOCAL LENGTH : f14.7mm(X1.0) IMG ADJUST  : AUTO SENSITIVITY : AUTO WHITEBAL    : AUTO SHARPNESS   : AUTO DATE        : 2004.03.12 19:28 QUALITY     : 2560x1920 FINE SATURATION  : 0 FOCUS AREA  : CENTER

Yeah. I looked at it again after I corrected it by reflex and thought ... er ... Nope, it was right the first time. Revert away! Or I will. (I got distracted by other topics just now.) Tannin

A request
Gary - do you have higher resolution versions of Image:Great Ocean Road 1.jpg and Image:Great Ocean Road 2.jpg? I *love* them, and I'd like to nominate them on the featured pics, but I think a larger version would help. →Raul654 19:26, May 5, 2004 (UTC)

Transcriber
Transcriber is the same as transcriptionist, and I intended it to include both people willing to notate music and type up audio, if the need for either should ever arrive. A list of polylinguists would be great, but I am not one. Hyacinth 20:27, 11 May 2004 (UTC)

Sunset
Holy cow. I'll wait a little bit to avoid overwhelming FPC with weather photos, but both your excellent photo and the other shot on sunset are stunning illustrations--I've seen nice sunset photos before, but these are really exceptional! If I forget to nominate in timely manner, please nominate them yourself and I'll happily vote them up -- excellent work! Jwrosenzweig 17:10, 13 May 2004 (UTC)

John Hancock Center
I was unable to find copyright information on Image:John Hancock Center (Boston) daytime.jpg. Because of this, I have listed it and others on Images for deletion. I have uploaded a replacement photo called Image:John Hancock Center (Boston) daytime 2.jpg. Just letting you know, MattSal 22:01, May 15, 2004 (UTC)

Footers
I've already started removing some of the non-geogrphaical/non-EU footers. Please help and remove the rest. It's been weeks a no one's objected. --Jiang 06:53, 19 May 2004 (UTC)

WorkSux
To whom it may concern...

My work load had recently risen sharply. I will log in here when I can.

If its urgent, email me. - Gaz 16:39, 4 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Work has not abated. The only plus is that it is all solid PHP coding. - Gaz 02:54, 23 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Image license
Hi,

Your image Image:Dominoes.jpg is currently used in the wikipedia repository of free images List_of_images, but doesn't actually have proper licensing information attached to it. Would you mind adding a license tag to it? Thanks, Wilke 21:17, 28 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Image:MerivaleBridge.jpg
--Diberri | Talk 18:05, Sep 1, 2004 (UTC)

Hiding your recent changes bookmarklet
I noticed that you requested the ability to hide your changes from the Watchlist. I wrote a bookmarklet that does this; it's on my page. Freel free to check it out. If it doesn't work, please let me know and I'll try to fix it. JesseW 08:05, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Image:AustNationalHwyMap.png
Hi! Thanks for uploading Image:AustNationalHwyMap.png. You mentioned that you got permission from the webmaster. Do you know if the webmaster gave permission only for Wikipedia to use, with no third-party use allowed, or if he gave permission for it to be licensed under the GFDL so that Wikipedia could use it? Thanks,   – Quadell (talk) (help)   14:17, Nov 14, 2004 (UTC)

United States Army Air Service
This article is in Spanish (I think, its definatly some foreign language) though I'm not sure how to move it across to there.

RFC pages on VfD
Should RFC pages be placed on VfD to be deleted? I'm considering removing Requests for comment/Slrubenstein, Requests for comment/Jwrosenzweig and Requests for comment/John Kenney from WP:VFD. Each of them was listed by CheeseDreams. Your comments on whether I should do this would be appreciated. - Ta bu shi da yu 03:43, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing
Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
 * Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
 * Multi-Licensing Guide
 * Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the " " template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

 * Option 1
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR
 * Option 2
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions to any U.S. state, county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace " " with "  ". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

FPRC
I don't know if you are aware but one of your pictures is currently on FPRC. BrokenSegue 00:03, 6 May 2005 (UTC)

Pic of the day
Hi Gaz,

Just to let you know that your photo Image:BrisbaneByNight2004.jpg is due to make a reappearance on Pic of the Day on the 21st May. I've used the same caption as last time, but you can make any changes at Picture of the day/May 21, 2005. -- Solipsist 20:49, 16 May 2005 (UTC)

...and Image:Gold Coast (from The Spit).jpg is coming up again on the 31st May, with the caption at Picture of the day/May 31, 2005. -- Solipsist 16:49, 25 May 2005 (UTC)

Dominoes
Hi Gaz. I love your photo Image:Dominoes.jpg! You wrote that the original version is 2560x1920. It would be wonderful if you could upload it (with the same name). Thanks! dbenbenn | talk 23:21, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Use of Brisbane image
Hi Gary,

Just wanted to let you know I've used your of Brisbane at night for the screenshot of the 0.1.8 release of my image editor Seashore. The screenshot for the program changes every release. I'm pretty sure the licensing details are correct. You can veiw the screenshot here.

Cedars 02:47, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Brisbane Image
Gaz, leave the image I've uploaded onto the Brisbane wiki. Your's is outdated and doesn't do the city justice.

Request
Hi Gaz,

My name is Fernanda Viégas and I have been studying Wikipedia for a while now (you can see a paper I published on the subject here). I would like to ask you a few questions about your activities as a Wikipedia image creator. I am fascinated by the pictorial side of Wikipedia and it would be great to hear about this community from one of its members. Would you be available to participate an email survey this week? Thanks, — Fernanda 03:12, 4 April 2006 (UTC)  | talk

 * Hi again, Gaz. I have started sending out the questionnaire to participants in the study and it would be great if you could participate too. If you'd like to get in touch with me via email, please use the "Email this user" feature on my page. Thanks! — Fernanda 21:20, 4 April 2006 (UTC)  | talk

file Wedding_planner_movie_poster.jpg
Hi, Dear Administrator! Please, let to delete this file: Wedding_planner_movie_poster.jpg (uploaded by me), because already exist Wplanner.jpg. Sorry for disturbing and thanx. Greating from fair Poland in Europa. Zboralski 00:09, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:190px-Greece-Cat.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:190px-Greece-Cat.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 00:27, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Great Ocean Road 1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Great Ocean Road 1.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 16:14, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Great Ocean Road 2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Great Ocean Road 2.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 16:14, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Help
Can you please help me by reviewing my article HSV Senator Signature it would help me alot.Senators 07:09, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

FP delisting nomination
Hello, I have nominated Image:BrisbaneByNight2004.jpg for delisting from WP:FP. You can join the discussion at. --KFP (talk | contribs) 14:17, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:WilsonsPromLightstation750.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:WilsonsPromLightstation750.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:35, 6 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. OsamaK 10:35, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:WilsonsPromLighthouse750.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:WilsonsPromLighthouse750.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:36, 6 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. OsamaK 10:36, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Brisbane meetup
Delivered on behalf of Dihydrogen Monoxide. Giggabot (talk) 14:01, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:UQ-SteeleBldg.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:UQ-SteeleBldg.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. BlueAzure (talk) 04:29, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Brisbane meetup invitation
Hey there, you're invited to the second Brisbane Meetup. Please see the page at Meetup/Brisbane/2 for more details. Hope to see you there!

Automated message delivered by Giggabot (stop!) to Wikipedians in Queensland and known Brisbaneites, at 03:36, 7 June 2008 (UTC).

Image source problem with Image:AlbertBridge.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:AlbertBridge.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:29, 20 June 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Papa November (talk) 21:29, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:CentenaryBridge.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:CentenaryBridge.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:30, 20 June 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Papa November (talk) 21:30, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:JackPeschBridge.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:JackPeschBridge.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:31, 20 June 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Papa November (talk) 21:31, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:StoryBridge.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:StoryBridge.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:32, 20 June 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Papa November (talk) 21:32, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:VictoriaBridge.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:VictoriaBridge.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:32, 20 June 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Papa November (talk) 21:32, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:WalterTaylorBridge.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:WalterTaylorBridge.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:33, 20 June 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Papa November (talk) 21:33, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:WilliamJollyBridge.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:WilliamJollyBridge.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:33, 20 June 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Papa November (talk) 21:33, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:MerivaleBridge.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:MerivaleBridge.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:20, 28 June 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 17:20, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:StoryBridgeByNight800.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:StoryBridgeByNight800.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:21, 28 June 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 17:21, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:GatewayBridge800.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:GatewayBridge800.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:21, 28 June 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 17:21, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:CaptainCookBridge.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:CaptainCookBridge.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:22, 28 June 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 17:22, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Huddled-Gaz.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Huddled-Gaz.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:23, 28 June 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 17:23, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Huddled.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Huddled.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:24, 28 June 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 17:24, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Santorini-mod-Gaz.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Santorini-mod-Gaz.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 17:29, 28 June 2008 (UTC) --SchuminWeb (Talk) 17:29, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:PointCartwright.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:PointCartwright.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:30, 28 June 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 17:30, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:NormanBay750.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:NormanBay750.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:31, 28 June 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 17:31, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:SouthEastPoint750.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:SouthEastPoint750.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:31, 28 June 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 17:31, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:WhaleRock750.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:WhaleRock750.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:31, 28 June 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 17:31, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:StrelitziaReginaeFlower.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:StrelitziaReginaeFlower.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:32, 28 June 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 17:32, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Home-icon.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Home-icon.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:32, 28 June 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 17:32, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Clock-UTC.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Clock-UTC.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:33, 28 June 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 17:33, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

Brisbane meetup invitation
Hi there! You are cordially invited to a barbeque and meetup at Southbank this Sunday (26 June). Details and an attendee list are at Meetup/Brisbane. Hope to see you there! Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:07, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

(this automated message was delivered using AutoWikiBrowser to all users in Category:Wikipedians in Brisbane)

Suspension of admin privileges due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative privileges of users who have been inactive for one year, meaning administrators who have made neither any edits nor any logged actions in over one year. As a result of this discussion, your administrative privileges have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these privileges reinstated, please post to the Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. RL0919 (talk) 21:26, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

File:MooloolabaSkyline.jpg needs authorship information
Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:MooloolabaSkyline.jpg appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided), authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).

 * If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which: will produce an appropriate expansion, or use the own template.

 * If this is an old image, for which the authorship is unknown or impossible to determine, please indicate this on the file description page.

If you have any questions please see Help:File page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:17, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Brisbane workshop and meetup invitation
Hi there! You are cordially invited to a series of Paralympic History workshops and a meetup next Saturday (26 May) and Sunday. In attendance will be University of Queensland faculty and Australian Paralympic Committee staff. Details and an attendee list are at Meetup/Brisbane/5. Hope to see you there! John Vandenberg 06:54, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Category:Wikipedians in Brisbane)

Brisbane meetup invitation
Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup this Friday evening (3 August). Details and an attendee list are at Meetup/Brisbane/6. Hope to see you there! John Vandenberg 01:11, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Brisbane)

Notice of change
Hello. You are receiving this message because of a [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Administrators&oldid=526254016#Restoration_of_the_tools_.28proposal.29 recent change] to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that if you are inactive for a continuous three year period, you will be unable to request return of the administrative user right. This includes inactive time prior to your desysopping if you were desysopped for inactivity and inactive time prior to the change in policy. Inactivity is defined as the absence of edits or logged actions. Until such time as you have been inactive for three years, you may request return of the tools at the bureaucrats' noticeboard. After you have been inactive for three years, you may seek return of the tools only through WP:RFA. Thank you.  MBisanz  talk 00:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Thank You for the Wikipedia Picture
Hello, My name is Duane Hurst and I recently made a free (non-commercial) English web site to share information with people. I added links to your Wikipedia/Wikimedia freeware picture (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:TwelveApostles-Gaz.jpg). I also gave credit to you on my web pages for your work. Thank you for sharing with the public. My website is:

http://www.freeenglishsite.com/

I add pictures such as yours to one of the following major sections of my site: 1. World section - contains information and over 10,000 images of every world country and territory. Link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/world/index.htm

2. USA section - contains information and images of every USA state and territory. Link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/world/usa/index.htm

3. English section - "Mel and Wes" lessons in conversation format. Stories are located in various USA states and world countries such as China, England, Germany, Japan, Mexico and Thailand. Each lesson has many slang terms and idioms, which I link to my Slang Dictionary. This eventually will have over 5,000 terms. Currently, it has about 3,000 slang and idioms. I regularly add new lessons and slang terms. Link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/english/lessons/index.htm Slang Dictionary link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/english/slang/Eslang_a.htm

Prior to retirement, I taught English at several private and public universities in the United States.

Please share this free site with your friends. I hope all will enjoy the pictures and find the English information useful. Sincerely, Duane Hurst in Utah, USA

Email address: duanerhurst@freeenglishsite.com --65.130.202.239 (talk) 00:51, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Brisbane meetup with Sue Gardner invitation
Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup on 11 Febrary 2013 with Sue Gardner.

Details at Meetup/Brisbane/7. Hope to see you there! John Vandenberg 10:28, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in SEQ)

Files missing description details
Dear uploader: The media files you uploaded as: are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.
 * File:GaryCurtis.jpg
 * File:GargoyleOverParis.jpg
 * File:Korea gyeongbokgung-mod-Gaz.jpg

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:54, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation
Template:Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. eh bien mon prince (talk) 06:08, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Template:Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. eh bien mon prince (talk) 06:09, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Invitation to join the Ten Year Society
Dear ,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Ten Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for ten years or more.

Best regards, Dan Koehl (talk) 08:10, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Gaz. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Gaz~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 00:00, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 13:11, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Brisbane Meetup
Hi there! I'm dropping you this notice as you've indicated on your userpage that you're a Wikipedian in the Brisbane area. Assuming significant interest, I'm organising an event for August 22 at the SLQ Café in South Brisbane, and we'd love for you to come along. A list of people interested in coming, and a discussion space has been created at Meetup/Brisbane/8. Hope to see you there! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:39, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Wikipedians in Brisbane. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Brisbane Meetup in January 2016
Hi there! I'm dropping you this notice as you've indicated on your userpage that you're a Wikipedian in the Brisbane area. To celebrate fifteen years of Wikipedia, we are holding a celebration in Brisbane on the 16th of January and you are invited! For further information, and to register your interest, please see our meetup page. Hope to see you there!

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Wikipedians in Brisbane. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery.

Please claim your upload(s) : File:GreatOceanRoad1-Gaz.jpg
Hi, This image was seemingly uploaded prior to current image polices, Thank you.

However, as part of ongoing efforts to ensure all media on English Wikipedia is correctly licensed and attributed it would be appreciated if you were able to confirm, that it was your own work, by marking it as own, amending the information added by a third party, and by changing the license to an appropriate "self" variant. This will assist those reviewing the many many "free" images on commons that have not yet been transfered to Commons. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:47, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Please claim your upload(s): File:GreatOceanRoad2-Gaz.jpg
Hi, This image was seemingly uploaded prior to current image polices, Thank you.

However, as part of ongoing efforts to ensure all media on English Wikipedia is correctly licensed and attributed it would be appreciated if you were able to confirm, that it was your own work, by marking it as own, amending the information added by a third party, and by changing the license to an appropriate "self" variant. This will assist those reviewing the many many "free" images on commons that have not yet been transfered to Commons. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:53, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Brisbane meetup - Sunday 10 December 2017 at The Edge, State Library of Queensland
If you are in or near Brisbane, please join us on Sunday 10 December 2017 any time from noon to 4pm at The Edge at the State Library of Queensland. For more details and to sign up, please go to the meetup page. See you there! Kerry (talk) 22:35, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Brisbane meetup: Saturday 13 January 2018 at The Edge, State Library of Queensland
If you are in or near Brisbane, please join us on Saturday 13 January 2018 any time from noon to 4pm at The Edge at the State Library of Queensland. For more details and to sign up, please go to the meetup page. See you there!

title: User talk:Gaz~enwiki


text:
Wheat beer

Wheat beer is a top-fermented beer which is brewed with a large proportion of wheat relative to the amount of malted barley. The two main varieties are German Weizenbier and Belgian witbier; other types include Lambic (made with wild yeast), Berliner Weisse (a cloudy, sour beer), and Gose (a sour, salty beer).

Varieties
Weißbier (German – "white beer") uses at least 52% wheat to barley malt to make a light-coloured top-fermenting beer. Witbier (Dutch – "white beer") uses flavorings such as coriander and orange peel. Belgian white beers are often made with raw unmalted wheat.

German Weißbier and Belgian witbier are termed "white beers" because "wheat" has the same etymological root as "white" in most West Germanic languages (including English).

Other wheat beer styles, such as Berliner Weiße, Gose, and Lambic, are made with a significant proportion of wheat.

Weizenbier
Weizenbier or Hefeweizen, in the southern parts of Bavaria usually called Weißbier (, literally "white beer", referring to the pale air-dried malt, as opposed to "brown beer" made from dark malt dried over a hot kiln), is a beer, traditionally from Bavaria, in which a significant proportion of malted barley is replaced with malted wheat. Wheat beer was introduced in Bavaria in the 15th century from neighbouring Bohemia. Because of reinheitsgebot only beer made from barley was allowed to be brewed in Bavaria up until 1548, when William IV, Duke of Bavaria, gave Baron Hans VI von Degenberg a special privilege to brew and sell wheat beer. By law, Weißbiers brewed in Germany must use a "top-fermenting" yeast. Specialized strains of yeast are used which produce overtones of banana and clove as by-products of fermentation. Historically, Bavarian Weißbier was either brewed with a large share of wheat malt (which was a ducal privilege in Bavaria) or from air-dried pale barley malt only (which was a common drink amongst poor people). It is well known throughout Germany, though better known as Weizen ("Wheat") outside Bavaria. The terms Hefeweizen ("yeast wheat") or Hefeweißbier refer to wheat beer in its traditional, unfiltered form. The term Kristallweizen (crystal wheat), or Kristallweißbier (crystal white beer), refers to a wheat beer that is filtered to remove the yeast and wheat proteins which contribute to its cloudy appearance.

The Hefeweizen style is particularly noted for its low hop bitterness (about 15 IBUs) and relatively high carbonation (approaching four volumes), considered important to balance the beer's relatively malty sweetness. Another balancing flavor note unique to Hefeweizen beer is its phenolic character; its signature phenol is 4-vinyl guaiacol, a metabolite of ferulic acid, the result of fermentation by top-fermenting yeast appropriate for the style. Hefeweizen's phenolic character has been described as "clove" and "medicinal" ("Band-aid") but also smoky. Other more typical but less assertive flavour notes produced by Weißbier yeast include "banana" (amyl acetate), "bubble gum", and sometimes "vanilla" (vanillin).

Weißbier is available in a number of other forms, including Dunkelweizen (dark wheat) and Weizenstarkbier (strong wheat beer), commonly referred to as Weizenbock. The dark wheat varieties are made with darker, more highly kilned malts (both wheat and barley). Weizenbocks typically have a much higher alcohol content than their lighter cousins.

The four largest brands in Germany are Erdinger, Paulaner, Franziskaner, and Maisel. Other renowned brands are Augustiner, Weihenstephaner, Schneider (a bronze-coloured specialty), and Andechser. Regional brands in Bavaria are Hopf, Unertl, Ayinger, Schweiger and Plank. Aventinus is an example of Weizen Doppelbock, stronger and darker version of Weizenbock, made by the G. Schneider & Sohn brewery in Kelheim.

British brewers producing cask-conditioned varieties include Oakleaf Eichenblatt Bitte, Hoskins White Dolphin, Fyfe Weiss Squad and Oakham White Dwarf.

Witbier
Witbier, white beer, bière blanche, or simply witte is a barley/wheat, top-fermented beer brewed mainly in Belgium and the Netherlands. It gets its name due to suspended yeast and wheat proteins, which cause the beer to look hazy, or white, when cold. Today, along with hops it usually contains a blend of spices, such as coriander, orange, and bitter orange.

As early as the 16th and 17th century, the white beers of Hoegaarden and Leuven were renowned. Along with barley malt and unmalted barley it contained some oats, though apart from hops no other spices were used. The barley was usually not kilned but left to dry on attics where the wind was allowed to blow past it, in order to obtain a light colour.

The style was revived by Pierre Celis at the Hoegaarden Brewery in Belgium and the Celis Brewery in the United States and is traditionally made with up to 50% raw wheat rather than wheat malt. It probably was Celis who started adding the various spices. The beers have a somewhat sour taste due to the presence of lactic acid or acetic acid, much more pronounced in the past than today. Also, the suspended yeast in the beer causes some continuing fermentation in the bottle.

Other varieties
A minor variety of wheat beer is represented by Berliner Weiße (Berlin White), which is low in alcohol (2.5% to 3% ABV) and intentionally tart. Sweetened syrups of lemon, raspberry, or woodruff herb are often added before drinking.

Leipziger Gose is similar to Berliner Weiße, but slightly stronger at around 4% ABV. Its ingredients include coriander and salt, which are unusual for German beers, but are traditional for that style of beer.

Belgian lambic is also made with wheat and barley, but differs from nearly all beers in the use of wild yeast for spontaneous fermentation.

A variation on the barley wine style involves adding a large quantity of wheat to the mash bill, resulting in what is referred to as wheat wine. This style originated in the United States in the 1980s.

Names and types
Wheat beers vary in name according to where they are brewed and small variations in the recipe. Among those used are:

 * Weißbier, short Weiße: Weiß is German for "white". These terms are used almost exclusively in the Southern German state of Bavaria and in Austria.
 * Weizenbier, short Weizen: Weizen is German for "wheat". These terms are used in the Western (Baden-Württemberg) and Northern German regions, as well as in Switzerland, for Weißbier.
 * Hefeweißbier or Hefeweizen: Hefe is the German word for yeast, is added to indicate that the beer is bottle-conditioned (unfiltered), thus might have sediment.
 * Kristallweißbier or Kristallweizen: Kristall, being German for crystal, is added if Weißbier is filtered clear of sediment.
 * Dunkles Weißbier or Dunkelweizen: A dark version of a wheat beer (dunkel is the German word for "dark")
 * Weizenbock is a wheat beer made in the bock style originating in Germany.
 * Witbier (literally, "white beer") or simply Wit: Dutch-language name for the Belgian style of wheat beer
 * Bière blanche (literally, "white beer"): The French language name for wheat beer

Serving
Bavarian-style wheat beer is usually served in 500 ml, vase-shaped glasses. In Belgium, witbier is usually served in a 250-ml glass; each brewery (Hoegaarden, Dentergems, etc.) has its own shape of glass. Berliner Weiße is often served in a schooner.

Kristallweizen (especially in Austria) and American styles of wheat beer are sometimes served with a slice of lemon or orange in the glass. This is not traditional in Bavaria, and is generally frowned upon there. The modern American custom appears to have originated in Portland, Oregon, in the mid-1980s, where the Dublin Pub served Widmer Brothers Brewery's Weizenbier with a slice of lemon, to accentuate the citrus flavor of the Cascade hops.

In northern Bavaria, a grain of rice commonly is added to Kristallweizen, which causes a gentle bubbling effect and results in a longer-lasting foam. A common item on pub menus in Bavaria is cola-weizen, which is a mix of cola and Weizenbier.

Another mixture popular during the summer is a radler variant with a 50–50 mix of Weißbier with lemonade named after cyclists.

Sensory profile
Weißbiers feature fermentation by-products such as esters (which lend fruity flavors and aromas), especially isoamyl acetate, reminiscent of bananas, and the phenolic compound guaiacol, a metabolite of ferulic acid, which smells and tastes like cloves. Other phenolics sometimes found in Weißbiers evoke medicinal or smoky sensations. The bittering level of most Weißbiers is close to 15 international bitterness units, a very low level. Hop flavor and aroma are typically low.

The ester and phenolic aspects are produced by the special type of yeast, rather than the high fraction of wheat in the grain bill.

The carbonation level can range from 5.5 g/L (about 2.7 volumes; slightly higher than that of most other German beers) to 7 g/L, or more. This produces a generous stand of foam, especially with the high protein content of wheat malt.

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Wheat beer


text:
Lens flare

A lens flare happens when light is scattered or flared in a lens system, often in response to a bright light, producing a sometimes undesirable artifact in the image. This happens through light scattered by the imaging mechanism itself, for example through internal reflection and forward scatter from material imperfections in the lens. Lenses with large numbers of elements such as zooms tend to have more lens flare, as they contain a relatively large number of interfaces at which internal scattering may occur. These mechanisms differ from the focused image generation mechanism, which depends on rays from the refraction of light from the subject itself.

There are two types of flare: visible artifacts and glare across the image. The glare makes the image look "washed out" by reducing contrast and color saturation (adding light to dark image regions, and adding white to saturated regions, reducing their saturation). Visible artifacts, usually in the shape of the aperture made by the iris diaphragm, are formed when light follows a pathway through the lens that contains one or more reflections from the lens surfaces.

Flare is particularly caused by very bright light sources. Most commonly, this occurs when aiming toward the Sun (when the Sun is in frame or the lens is pointed sunward), and is reduced by using a lens hood or other shade. For good-quality optical systems, and for most images (which do not have a bright light shining into the lens), flare is a secondary effect that is widely distributed across the image and thus not visible, although it does reduce contrast.

Manifestation
The spatial distribution of the lens flare typically manifests as several starbursts, rings, or circles in a row across the image or view. Lens flare patterns typically spread widely across the scene and change location with the camera's movement relative to light sources, tracking with the light position and fading as the camera points away from the bright light until it causes no flare at all. The specific spatial distribution of the flare depends on the shape of the aperture of the image formation elements. For example, if the lens has a 6-bladed aperture, the flare may have a hexagonal pattern.

Such internal scattering is also present in the human eye, and manifests in an unwanted veiling glare most obvious when viewing very bright lights or highly reflective surfaces. In some situations, eyelashes can also create flare-like irregularities, although these are technically diffraction artifacts.

When a bright light source is shining on the lens but not in its field of view, lens flare appears as a haze that washes out the image and reduces contrast. This can be avoided by shading the lens using a lens hood. In a studio, a gobo or set of barn doors can be attached to the lighting to keep it from shining on the camera. Filters can be attached to the camera lens which will also minimise lens flare, which is especially useful for outdoor photographers.

When using an anamorphic lens, as is common in analog cinematography, lens flare can manifest itself as horizontal lines. This is most commonly seen in car headlights in a dark scene, and may be desired as part of the "film look".

Deliberate use

A lens flare is often deliberately used to invoke a sense of drama. A lens flare is also useful when added to an artificial or modified image composition because it adds a sense of realism, implying that the image is an un-edited original photograph of a "real life" scene.

For both of these reasons (implying realism and/or drama) artificial lens flare is a common effect in various graphics editing programs, although its use can be a point of contention among professional graphic designers. Lens flare was one of the first special effects developed for computer graphics because it can be imitated using relatively simple means. Basic flare-like effects, for instance in video games, can be obtained by drawing starburst, ring, and disc textures over the image and moving them as the location of the light source changes. More sophisticated rendering techniques have been developed based on ray tracing or photon mapping.

Lens flare was typically avoided by Hollywood cinematographers, but when filming Easy Rider (1969), Harrison Arnold was forced to modify a camera car for his Arriflex, which resulted in numerous lens flares as he shot motorcycle footage against landscapes of the Southwestern United States.

Director J. J. Abrams added numerous lens flares to his films Star Trek (2009) and Super 8 (2011) by aiming powerful off-camera light sources at the lens. He explained in an interview about Star Trek: "I wanted a visual system that felt unique. I know there are certain shots where even I watch and think, 'Oh that's ridiculous, that was too many.' But I love the idea that the future was so bright it couldn't be contained in the frame." Many complained of the frequent use; Abrams conceded it was "overdone, in some places."

David Boyd, the director of photography of the sci-fi Firefly series, desired this style so much (harkening back to 1970s television), that he sent back cutting-edge lenses that reduced lens flare in exchange for cheaper ones.

Filter flare
The use of photographic filters can cause flare, particularly ghosts of bright lights (under central inversion). This can be eliminated by not using a filter, and reduced by using higher-quality filters or narrower aperture.

Diffraction artifact in digital cameras
One form of flare is specific to digital cameras. With the sun shining on an unprotected lens, a group of small rainbows appears. This artifact is formed by internal diffraction on the image sensor, which acts like a diffraction grating. Unlike true lens flare, this artifact is not visible in the eyepiece of a digital SLR camera, making it more difficult to avoid.

title: Lens flare


text:
Suspension

Suspension or suspended may refer to:

Science and engineering

 * Car suspension
 * Cell suspension or suspension culture, in biology
 * Guarded suspension, a software design pattern in concurrent programming suspending a method call and the calling thread until a precondition (guard) is satisfied
 * Magnetic suspension, a method by which an object is suspended with no support other than magnetic fields
 * Suspension (topology), in mathematics
 * Suspension (dynamical systems), in mathematics
 * Suspension of a ring, in mathematics
 * Suspension (chemistry), small solid particles suspended in a liquid
 * Colloidal suspension
 * Suspension (mechanics), system allowing a machine to move smoothly with reduced shock
 * Suspensory behavior, arboreal locomotion of primates
 * Suspend to disk, also known as hibernation, powering down a computer while retaining its state.
 * The superstructure of a suspension bridge

Temporary revocation of privileges

 * Suspension (punishment), temporary exclusion as a punishment
 * Suspension from the UK parliament
 * Suspension (Catholic canonical penalty)
 * Suspension of driving privileges ("suspended driver's license")
 * Administrative License Suspension (ALS), US, driving license suspension without a court hearing

Entertainment

 * Suspension (music), one or more notes temporarily held before resolving to a chord tone
 * Suspension (film), 2007 film directed by Alec Joler and Ethan Shaftel
 * Suspended (film), 1987 Polish film
 * Suspended (video game) (1983), an interactive fiction video game
 * "Suspension", a song by Lights from Siberia, 2011

Literature

 * Suspension of disbelief, the intentional avoidance of critical thinking or logic in examining a work of fiction

Eroticism

 * Suspension bondage, the act of suspending a human body using suspension ropes, cables, or chains
 * Suspension (body modification), the act of suspending a human body from hooks that have been put through body piercings

title: Suspension


text:
User talk:Sebastian

There are several users on Wikipedia by the name of Sebastian. You may be looking for the talk page of one of the following editors:
 * Sebastian Dietrich
 * Sebastian Helm (This user is the same who registered this user page and who used to edit using this account.)
 * Sebastian Wallroth

title: User talk:Sebastian


text:
Talk:Stun gun

Untitled
For this part "bodies works by sending electrical charges", we must use the word "charge" because a current can't actually be sent anywhere, it just exists. It is just a quantity is some value at a given position (charge per second). Charge, however is physical, and it can be sent somewhere. This is a small technicallity I know. But if you really want to change it back to "current", the sentence will have to be re-worded.

Don't they call them "less-lethal"? The taser website uses that term. - Omegatron 21:16, May 6, 2004 (UTC)

 * They do call them "less-lethal" -- it's an important distinction for law enforcement agencies. Also, some of the Taser spec sheets show currents of 162mA (www.taser.com/pages/pr/m26.html) -- quite different than the 3mA quoted in the article.

Pain
stun guns inflict a lot of pain the funtion is to shoot two harpoon like darts into the victims body and from that, the electricity is allowed to travel into the persons body —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.33.164.19 (talk) 17:20, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Legalities
Stun guns are prohibited in parts of some states. a portion of a list achieved from Safe Around Campus New York Massachusetts Michigan Wisconsin Illinois New Jersey Rhode Island Maryland Pennsylvania —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.56.38.133 (talk) 00:45, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Stune gunes

mystery man
mystery titles —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.112.237.233 (talk) 22:42, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:Stun gun


text: User:JSF

title: User:JSF


text:
User talk:JSF

Hello and Welcome! I hope you like the place! --mav

title: User talk:JSF


text:
User:Stib

About my work: I do motion graphics for broadcast, I've got mad skillz with After Effects and Lightwave and I write plugins for Final Cut Pro. let me know if you need any animations or illustrations done. I've only recently started doing wiki illustrations so far I've done these:

 * A series of illustrations for the article secret_sharing
 * A light cone for the article World_line

title: User:Stib


text:
User talk:Stib

Hello and Welcome! I hope you like the place! --mav

It's amazing. - stib

Secret sharing planes
Hi, thanks for making these: mad skillz indeed! Cheers. I've gone and added them to secret sharing with a brief caption for now. It'd be good to add them to plane (mathematics), too, I think. The images aren't too large; the thumbnailing system makes them a good size for web display, and the larger size helps if they were ever to be printed (that's actually a possibility at some point, as secret sharing is one of about 70 articles for a WikiReader in Cryptography).

Is it OK if I label the images ? Or do you do the whole multi-licensing / PD thing as well? — Matt Crypto 07:42, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)

 * yeah sure GFDL is good. I'm not that well informed about the various flavours of Gnu license but from what I read in the article about it, GFDL looks appropriate.
 * Thanks. — Matt Crypto 21:08, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Did you want text labels put on? And would marking the line / point where the planes intersect improve legibility? I can add these if it does.
 * Probably not text labels (since without it's more useful for other language Wikipedias). Regarding marking the point/line -- maybe we should try it and see? I like the "clean" look at the moment, but it might be clearer for the reader if the intersections were emphasised in some way. — Matt Crypto 21:08, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for the new versions of these images with the intersections highlighted; I think it works well. One thing: I was having a look at Image:Secretsharing-2-line.png, and I wondered if it might be worth playing with the colours a little. The reason being that when the yellow plane passes behind the red, it's quite hard to make out through the transparancy -- do you think there's any way that could be improved? I don't know if there is any practical way to fix this or not.

On a completely different topic, one tip is that you can "sign" your messages by typing ~ after your comments; that way people can keep track of discussions more easily. — Matt Crypto 12:20, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Crypto WikiProject monthly summary
Quick note to let you know that some of your editing this month was mentioned in WikiProject_Cryptography/March_2005. Thanks! — Matt Crypto 16:50, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Byrcolorwheel2.png.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Byrcolorwheel2.png.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 15:16, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

Congratulations, Sib2 and fam
Did you know that the population of Brian Emstrongs has also tripled in the last six months? --Shirt58 12:28, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Graphics Lab
I saw your name listed on Wikiproject Illustration or  the list of graphic artists, and I thought I'd let you know that a Graphics Lab has been created on EN. Based on the highly successful French and German graphics labs, it seeks to better organise and coordinate our graphic design and photo-editing efforts. Up until now, there has been no common space on EN where users could ask for maps, charts and other SVG files to be created. What's more, the Graphics Lab has discussion boards, tips, tools and links; in sum, a good common workspace. Come help us out! The infrastucture is already in place, and now we need participants. :) -- Zantastik  talk  00:42, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Used your pictures
Hi,

I added your secret sharing pictures to the article on systems of linear equations. They're quite nice, and I think they improve the article a lot.

By the way, how much effort is required to make these? I wouldn't mind a couple more for the systems of linear equations article, and I imagine that articles like arrangement of hyperplanes could benefit from some similar pictures. Jim 06:01, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Category:Potentially Good Names For Heavy Metal Bands
I have nominated Category:Potentially Good Names For Heavy Metal Bands for deletion here. I didn't do this to be rude; in fact, being a huge metal fan myself, I thought it was quite funny. But I don't think it belongs in Wikipedia. --Eastlaw (talk) 19:10, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

 * LOL, don't feel bad. If PWI (Posting While Intoxicated) was a crime, I would be serving multiple life sentences right now.  I try to be good about it here, but you should see some of the stuff I've posted on discussion boards when I was trashed.  --Eastlaw (talk) 01:07, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

New image project
Hi. This little form letter is just a courtesy notice to let you know that a proposal to merge the projects WikiProject Free images, WikiProject Fair use, WikiProject Moving free images to Wikimedia Commons and WikiProject Illustration into the newly formed WikiProject Images and Media has met with general support at WikiProject Council/Proposals/Files. Since you're on the rosters of membership in at least one of those projects, I thought you might be interested. Conversation about redirecting those projects is located here. Please participate in that discussion if you have any interest, and if you still have interest in achieving the goals of the original project, we'd love to have you join in. If you aren't interested in either the conversation or the project, please pardon the interruption. :) Thanks. Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:00, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Mes compliments pour votre Wikipedia - postes.
Bonjour, User Stib. Excellentes prestations. Un grand nombre de contributions très intéressantes. Votre coopération avec diverses autorités nationales -, moi, devrait être récompensé par une médaille. Distressed seulement quelques incidents. Juste après la participation dans le sujet . Via wotre vidéo Survilance - de la Cam à moi, dans le tram, peigner un bande jeunes Jank's - étrangers. Je ne peux pas imaginer que ce que votre participation est arrivé, oui moi! Seulement intéressé par eux-mêmes, - comment il est arrivé là? Je doute même vous cher User  pourrait soulever un profit. (Désolé pour Google Traduction). Deswegen : /de/ Hervorragende Leistungen. Grosse Zahl  sehr interessanten Beiträge. Ihre Zusammenarbeit mit verschiedene Inland - Behörden , mein Meinung nach , mit ein Orden belohnt werden soll. Beunruhigen nur ein paar Vorfällen. Gleich nach dem Beteiligung in das Thema . Via wotre Video- Survilance - Cam's auf mich zu, in der Tram , kamm eine Jugendlichen Jank's - Ausländern Band. Ich kann mir nicht vorstellen das dass mit Ihre Teilnahme passierte, ja ! Interessiere sich nur, - wie es dazu gekommen ? Ich bezweifle auch dass Sie geehrter  ein Profit davon erziehen könnte.109.128.215.0 (talk) 17:16, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Secretsharing-2.png

The file File:Secretsharing-2.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: "Over time, this image has been replaced by File:Intersecting Planes 2.svg, already hosted at Commons."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ★ Bigr   Tex  21:10, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Secretsharing-3.png

The file File:Secretsharing-3.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: "Over time, this image has been replaced by File:Secretsharing 3-point.svg, already hosted at Commons."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ★ Bigr   Tex  21:12, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

title: User talk:Stib


text: User:Sardonic

title: User:Sardonic