text:
Talk:black brotus

RFV discussion: June–September 2012
"A kind of marine wildlife found in the area of the US Virgin Islands." So what is it: a fish, a seal, a bird? I can't see it in Google Books at all either. Equinox ◑ 19:19, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
 * RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 03:16, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:black brotus


text:
Talk:godwink

RFV
Protologism? Used by a single author? SemperBlotto (talk) 07:23, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The term was recognized in various publications as a "new word of the year", or reasonable equivalent. http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/24/weekinreview/24barrett.html I am not religious, and I had not heard of either Rushnell, or godwink, until I came across a related MFD.  I did a google search and seemed to find the term widely re-used.  What did you find with your google search?  Geo Swan (talk) 08:53, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * You may not be aware of WT:CFI. A simple Google search means nothing, you can get hits for absolute nonsense on Google. Mglovesfun (talk)
 * Here a few: the original coining, plus some independent uses. The single word form is hard to attest, but "God wink", in various forms of capitalisation/hyphenation is easier:
 * Smurrayinchester (talk) 12:46, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * It does seem that this spelling may not be citable. Until it is, we might have a redirect to a citable form, apparently God wink. The ambiguity of spelling is certainly suggestive that it is or is becoming idiomatic. The context in which its meaning is lexically understood rather than constructed from its parts may be quite limited. DCDuring TALK 14:17, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I have no objection to placing this entry at god wink. Geo Swan (talk) 15:48, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Godwink seems to be the spelling SQuire uses, but outside his books God wink prevails (apparently "godwink" is a trademark of SQuire's...). I dug up two more godwinks, so it's probably attestable (as long as one use by him is acceptable), but I don't know which should be the alternative form of which.
 * Smurrayinchester (talk) 20:08, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Smurrayinchester (talk) 12:46, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * It does seem that this spelling may not be citable. Until it is, we might have a redirect to a citable form, apparently God wink. The ambiguity of spelling is certainly suggestive that it is or is becoming idiomatic. The context in which its meaning is lexically understood rather than constructed from its parts may be quite limited. DCDuring TALK 14:17, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I have no objection to placing this entry at god wink. Geo Swan (talk) 15:48, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Godwink seems to be the spelling SQuire uses, but outside his books God wink prevails (apparently "godwink" is a trademark of SQuire's...). I dug up two more godwinks, so it's probably attestable (as long as one use by him is acceptable), but I don't know which should be the alternative form of which.
 * Smurrayinchester (talk) 20:08, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Smurrayinchester (talk) 20:08, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Smurrayinchester (talk) 20:08, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

 * Here are two more citations:
 * A remarkable "coincidence"--a godwink--had reunited a long lost mother and daughter. What are the odds of that?
 * THI$ I$ YOUR GODWINK --BB12 (talk) 21:26, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * @BB12: The first groups citation is quoting Rushnell, isn't it?
 * @SMW: I'd make the more common one the main form. From the evidence the "trademarked" form is the source. DCDuring TALK 22:58, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * You are correct, thank you! --BB12 (talk) 23:48, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * @DCDuring I think he only came up with one word form some time around 2006 - possibly for copyright reasons. His earlier books use "God Wink". Pages created. Smurrayinchester (talk) 08:05, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

 * RFV-passed. - -sche (discuss) 04:58, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Talk:godwink


text:
Talk:ԓы̄

RFV discussion: June–September 2012
this can only be wrong, as neither the ԓ nor the ы̄ are actually used in Nenets orthography — Liliana • 21:37, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
 * RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 03:04, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:ԓы̄


text:
Talk:galeanthropy

RFV discussion: May–October 2012
A lot of mentions out there, but that won't cite it. --Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 13:35, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
 * 2009 "That is the most interesting delusion I've come across since reading up on galeanthropy," said Sophie.
 * 1967 Thus, in this city of several great institutions of learning Galeanthropy and Incubus came to life behind every lamp post, and for all I know these revenants may yet linger in many good Philadelphians who likewise ponder and act upon the notion that cats...
 * 2008 kindred--golden-garlanded black-slit galeanthropic eyeballs cared nothing.
 * Spinning Spark  20:24, 14 May 2012 (UTC) to 20:37, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, but the 2008 cite is for, not IMO. So one more is needed (and they all need to be added to the entry). --Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 03:44, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

 * Passes RFV, by my ken, thanks to the additional citations added to the entry by Astral. - -sche (discuss) 04:51, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Poor coinage
I wish people with limited Ancient Greek skills wouldn't coin words like this. Obviously it should be called "ailuranthropy". —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 15:00, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
 * :-D — SMUconlaw (talk) 17:18, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:galeanthropy


text:
Talk:heliocentrism

RFV discussion: May–October 2012
Rfv-sense:
 * 3. A now-defunct theory that all primitive cultures worshipped the Sun and its movements and patterns.
 * 4. An obsession with the Sun and its movements and patterns.

I don't find these in other dictionaries, nor was I able to locate supporting quotes. --Hekaheka (talk) 22:03, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The correct names to go with these definitions would almost certainly be heliotheism and heliophilia. The first is attested, while the second is used almost exclusive with respect to sun-loving plants. Cheers! bd2412 T 22:11, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Heliotheism is belief in sun-worship. The belief that everyone used to believe that is not likely to be the same word (if there is one)> Spinning Spark  23:40, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

 * RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 03:19, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:heliocentrism


text:
Talk:authoritarian

RFV discussion: July–October 2012
Rfv-sense "An organization or state which enforces strong or oppressive measures against its population." I'm familiar with the statement "Mubarak was an authoritarian", but "Egypt was an authoritarian"? - -sche (discuss) 20:49, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
 * RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 07:41, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:authoritarian


text:
Talk:ma'ame

RFV discussion: July–October 2012
Any comments? --Æ&Œ (talk) 05:07, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

 * It seems to be more common in English books than French ones, but searching for the phrase the one citation already in the entry uses,, turns up 154 hits, of which at least 5 of the first 10 are valid (they're in French and not scannos):    . Do you think it's dated? - -sche (discuss) 05:25, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
 * It looks like a good entry for an attestable word to me. :) - -sche (discuss) 05:28, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
 * There are no relevant hits on Google groups, which indeed suggests that it is antiquated. This contraction is considerably rare ; I am betting that this is dialectal, but I cannot say for certain. (“bonjour ma’ame” or “non ma’ame” also turn up some hits.) --Æ&Œ (talk) 05:48, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

 * (after edit conflict) The original cite is suspect, since it's an anecdote about an Irish fellow in England trying to pass himself off as French: note the user of "shure" to show how bad his accent is. There still seem to be plenty of cites where one can eliminate imitation of English as the source of the spelling. I wonder if it's significant that all of the ones I looked at were servants trying to pacify someone in a superior position? Perhaps social changes have caused this form to disappear. Chuck Entz (talk) 05:57, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Good catch! Another reason to write "ma'ame" might be to stress the African accent of a servant or a slave. Before accepting a citation, check carefully the origins of the speaker.
 * In France, nowadays, I know of only three ways to verbally abbreviate "madame":
 * by omitting the first "a" (m'dame, much like m'sieur). This the most common way.
 * by omitting the "ma" (dame). Used in rural areas and only before a proper noun (afaik, you would not say "bonjour dame!")
 * by omitting the "da" (mame, m'ame or ma'me). Idem.
 * For a native French, "ma'ame" is difficult to pronounce because of the two successive "a". Therefore, this is definitely not a natural way to abbreviate "madame". From my point of view, "ma'ame" denotes someone of foreign origin who makes the effort to pronounce "madame" correctly, but without success. — Xavier, 07:18, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm with Xhienne on this, it's really counterintuitive. Mglovesfun (talk) 10:54, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
 * @Xhienne: without knowing any old French, I would guess "ma'ame" is intended to be pronounced with a single "a", like English "ma'am" (which is /mæm/, not /mæ.æm/). - -sche (discuss) 17:55, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Possibly. But in such a situation where the author wants to stress that the word has been altered by the speaker, it is very uncommon in French to write letters that should not be pronounced. I can quickly and easily find a lot of unambiguous examples on b.g.c. with "m'ame" or "ma'me" instead of "madame" (by unambiguous, I mean that these texts are not translations and the story happens in France, or the speaker is French).
 * This is much less obvious with "ma'ame". At first sight, among your examples, only #2 is unambiguous for me. #1 is a translation; in #3 the speakers have an English name; I have little context on #4 but it looks like a collection of novels of which the origin is unknown to me; #5 is not readable for me but its author has an English name. — Xavier, 22:47, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The last one I linked to, I noticed, is the same as the one in the entry. So, it does seem to be a dated, nonstandard term. How's this? - -sche (discuss) 23:43, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

 * Resolved. - -sche (discuss) 22:09, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:ma'ame


text:
Talk:alferecía

RFV discussion: July–October 2012
Made by a newbie editor; could someone please check that it's right? —Internoob 06:21, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Looks it; the first three Google Book hits on books.google.es are in Spanish and support the definition. There are about 14 000 hits for it in Spanish alone. Mglovesfun (talk) 10:59, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Do you actually require someone to copy up three citations. Technically WT:CFI doesn't mention where the citations have to be, just that there be three citations. I'd just rather not copy three citations up when I can do something else with that time. It's basically a copy-and-paste exercise. Mglovesfun (talk) 18:13, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

 * RFV-passed per Mg. - -sche (discuss) 22:10, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:alferecía


text:
Talk:Alice

RFV discussion: July–October 2012
Rfv-sense: The main character in Lewis Carroll's books Alice's Adventures in Wonderland and Through the Looking-Glass. Needs cites meeting WT:FICTION criteria. -- Liliana • 06:48, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * FWIW (nothing I hope) if cited I'm moving to RFD, as simple a specific way of using the given name. For example we don't have a Moby-Dick sense of Ishmael, though in the book, I believe Ishmael doesn't have a surname. Mglovesfun (talk) 16:17, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 22:14, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

old French "Alis" and "Alais" not "Alice"
"Alice" is the recent way of writting it.

Magnon86 (talk) 07:02, 18 June 2017 (UTC)magnon86

title: Talk:Alice


text:
Talk:it'dve

RFV discussion: July–October 2012
A misspelling at best. I could not discover any relevant results on either Google Groups or Google Books. --Æ&Œ (talk) 04:51, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

 * It might be keepable as a redirect to . It is not a " common misspelling" AFAICT, but it looks like a mistake to me. It just might be the kind of mistake our users would make, though the search engine probably handles it adequately: I typed in "itdve" and "i't'd'v'e" and both (and only) it'd've and it'dve appeared each time. DCDuring TALK 04:59, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as a typo, let the search engine do the searching instead of using a redirect. Mglovesfun (talk) 13:21, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 * RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 22:17, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:it'dve


text:
Talk:SUL

RFV discussion: July–October 2012
Is this used outside WMF? — Liliana • 20:48, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Uncited. Deleted. - -sche (discuss) 22:19, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:SUL


text:
Talk:xigua

Examples
From The Silk Road: A Very Short Introduction: "… and the watermelon, which is originally African but known in Chinese as xigua, or 'western melon,' reflecting its arrival via the silk road."

From A Short History of the World:

"The grape comes from the west, and the watermelon even now is known as xigua or the western melon."

xiguas
I am requesting the attestation of the existence of the form in English, in the first place. I cannot find anything on Google Books and Usenet; even does not seem to find anything. --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:36, 15 July 2012 (UTC) I've brought xigua back purely for the purposes of this rfv: it means that non-admins will be able to see the entry's history, contributors and so on. Mglovesfun (talk) 17:53, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
 * If the "singular" didn't deserve RFV presumably the plural doesn't either. Siuenti (talk) 10:24, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Either this should've been speedily deleted, or xigua should've been fully RFV'd. Mglovesfun (talk) 20:29, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
 * This is total utter bs. xīguā is the pinyin for 西瓜 (Citrullus vulgaris), which is the exact Mandarin equivalent of watermelon (Citrullus vulgaris). The author might have spotted its use in an Asian supermarket, written by someone who didn't know how to say it in English. Jamesjiao → T ◊ C 22:42, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

 * RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 22:22, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

RFD discussion: June 2022

 * See Talk:feichang.

title: Talk:xigua


text:
Talk:yermulke

RFV discussion: July 2012
This spelling appears to be rare, in my opinion. --Æ&Œ (talk) 09:50, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
 * That's why we have . Do you doubt that it is attestable? DCDuring TALK 10:01, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Usenet citations exist in reasonable number to supplement the meager number of books cites. DCDuring TALK 10:05, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I was not certain what to classify this as. You can end this request for verification if it pleases you. --Æ&Œ (talk) 22:36, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
 * It pleases me. Struck. --Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 04:05, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:yermulke


text:
Talk:daiman

RFV discussion: July 2012
Rfv-sense ; this Tok Pisin term crops up occasionally in the first sense, but I can't find any evidence of it existing in this sense. I suspect it to be an ad hoc translation rather than a truly existing word. --Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 18:45, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Verifiable word but incorrectly spelled. Diamond in the Tok Pisin langauge is daimen, not daiman. Daiman means "dead person" or corpse, so I think that needs some adjustment :)  (Verified by the Human Languages Project, compiled by Terry and Sylvia O'Dell Barhorst (archived version by www.june29.com) BarkingFish (talk) 22:49, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
 * We already have the corpse sense, so I closed this and I'll move the content to daimen. Thanks! --Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 22:53, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:daiman


text:
Talk:otonomi

RFV discussion: July–October 2012
RFV (Tok Pisin); commonly used in Indonesian to refer to the goals of ethnic Papuans in West Papua (the Indonesian half of the island, aka Irian Jaya, where Tok Pisin is not spoken), but I can't find any evidence that it is used in Tok Pisin or at all on the eastern half of the island (Papua New Guinea). --Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 19:31, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Unverifiable - Have been through most of my currently available resources of the language, and have been unable to find any reference to this whatsoever in any material. BarkingFish (talk) 23:14, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

 * RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 07:42, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:otonomi


text:
Talk:aiadin

RFV discussion: July–October 2012
Again, definitely a word in Indonesian, but I can't find anything in Tok Pisin. --Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 20:38, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Unverifiable - A wide search of my material, plus google and other sources I use, again reveals no trace of this word in the Tok Pisin language. BarkingFish (talk) 23:15, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

 * RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 22:29, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:aiadin


text:
Talk:ambilok

RFV discussion: July–October 2012
Another Tok Pisin term. I'm glad I decided to go through these. I can't find any evidence of it. Perhaps a typo for, which would make more sense, but I can't find that either. --Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 21:06, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Unverified - wrong term - Ambilok does not refer to an envelope. The word does not exist in Tok Pisin, and neither does Ambilop. The term commonly used in this language for an envelope is Skin pas (literally a skin purse, or a closed or sealed skin). (See daiman above for reference, same one used here) BarkingFish (talk) 23:20, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

 * RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 07:46, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:ambilok


text:
Talk:ridim

RFV discussion: July–October 2012
Bislama usually (if not always) uses the suffix -em for transitive verbs, not -im like other closely related languages. I think this might just be an error by the author (EncycloPetey), but I'm sending it here to be sure. --Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 01:59, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Cannot verify in this language ridim exists as Tok Pisin, to read (also ritim as an alternative spelling) however. You may wish to view this link (the front page of the Bislama Wikipedia, where you can see the word jenisim used to mean change/edit - so it is possible that this could be correct. BarkingFish (talk) 12:57, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Great job as always. I forgot to add Tok Pisin, so I'll do that. Also, I think you've provided enough evidence for me that Bislama also uses -im; I wonder if it's a dialectal thing (I'm still pretty unclear on the dialectal divergences in Tok Pisin). --Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 15:50, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

My mistake. I have since read up on Bislama grammar, and this is the correct term (there is a system of vowel harmony at work, which is more complex than most creoles). I have also found a sufficient citation in Crowley 2004 (if anyone wants it, just ask me). So, RFV-passed. --Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 05:27, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

 * Resolved. - -sche (discuss) 07:44, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:ridim


text:
Talk:mox nix

RFV discussion: July 2012
No wonder this was on Urban Dictionary but not here. I can't cite it with bgc, and I might be able to with ggc, but it looks like every use is intertwined with a mention, and it's hard to tell if those count. --Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 18:39, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I suspect this is from Yiddish, rather than German, and it might be just used in English as quoted Yiddish. I don't have any Yiddish references to check, though. Chuck Entz (talk) 19:02, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't know how you'd tell, although it was obviously in currency to use in German for a while. BTW this is a followup to WT:ES. --Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 19:06, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I found and added three cites on b.g.c., so I guess this can be struck. As to whether it originates with German or Yiddish, Eric Partridge's Dictionary of Catch Phrases says it originated with American G.I.s stationed in Germany after WWII (and indeed one of the cites is a letter from an American G.I. stationed in Germany after WWII), which strongly suggests German rather than Yiddish. —Angr 19:24, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, it is from German, not Yiddish. It is (or was, at least during the latter half of the 20th century) very common in the normal speech of American military members who had been stationed in Germany. Rarely written, though. —Stephen (Talk) 19:28, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
 * (after second edit conflict) Well, macht nichts is very basic, common German, so that's not a factor. I was just thinking that Yiddish is a much more productive conduit for such terms to enter English. I'm also wondering if the origin is from "macht es nichts" (contracted to "macht's nichts"), which has the subject and verb inverted like you would expect in various clauses, but might be idiomatically used as a variant of "es macht nichts". I should add that Angr's information sounds pretty persuasive (and Stephen's, too). Chuck Entz (talk) 19:31, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

@Angr: I'd say that the first cite (the WWII one) actually supports a new sense/POS, because it looks like an adjective there to me ("of no importance"). If you agree, that would leave only two cites, and two more to be found for the adjectival sense. --Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 19:34, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
 * It might be use of a phrase along the lines of: "good-bye stress, hello vacation". That is, using the imagined utterance as a whole almost as a symbol rather than as a part of speech. Chuck Entz (talk) 19:45, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
 * At any rate, I've added an adjective meaning and some more cites. There are now four for the interjection and three for the adjective, including one using the alternative spelling "mox-nix" with a hyphen. —Angr 19:59, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Wow! Thanks! I must be very bad at citing things... --Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 20:13, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

So is this now sufficiently cited that it can be struck and the RFV tag removed? —Angr 06:50, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Of course. I only didn't do it because I was criticized for doing it too soon once, and that seems subjective to me, so I don't wish to incur others' wrath. --Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 07:00, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
 * It looks cited to me. DCDuring TALK 13:05, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Good. I'm striking it here and removing the tag. —Angr 15:53, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:mox nix


text:
Talk:Yalikavak

RFV discussion: July–October 2012
Afrikaans. Pretty unlikely. --Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 20:20, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
 * RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 22:32, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:Yalikavak


text:
Talk:harim

RFV discussion: July–August 2012
Rfv-sense. I know the other sense, meaning or, is real, but this one seems bogus. BarkingFish? --Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 05:32, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Indeed you are correct - harim (to mean "understand") is utterly wrong! The correct term for "understand" is save, in usage it would be along these lines: "Dispela yusa i save long Tok Pisin kain olsem wanpela lokol." BarkingFish (talk) 11:19, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
 * From the tpi-4 template, eh? On that subject, can you check that is correct? I have a quote, so it's real, but I can't find it any dictionaries, so I had to guess the definition. Maybe it's actually a synonym of ? --Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 19:46, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Entry fixed. --Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 04:16, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:harim


text:
Talk:sideprint

RFV discussion: July 2012
Protologism? SemperBlotto (talk) 07:02, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
 * "Usage originated by LS and WG as a single-term description for the sides of a laptop used for peripheral bus location in Daleville, Indiana". Care to venture a guess where the Geolocate utility says the IP is located? 3 (Danish-language) Google Groups hits and 15 Google Books hits for "sideprint", 17 Google Groups hits for "sideprints", 0 Google Books hits for "sideprint", none remotely like the sense given. There are lots of Google Search hits, but they mostly seem to be for shirts printed on the sides, and they aren't durably archived. This has all the signs of a posting by the proud parent of a protologism. Chuck Entz (talk) 07:50, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedied - feel free to recreate with a citeable definition (I think there's at least one). --Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 00:37, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:sideprint


text:
Talk:airfoam

RFV discussion: July 2012
Protologism? I think the commercial product may be capitalised. (irrelevent "see also") SemperBlotto (talk) 07:35, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:airfoam


text:
Talk:IndyCycle

RFV discussion: July–October 2012
"A vehicle that is a hybrid of an Indycar and a motorcycle." Appears to be one specific person's pet project, not a generic term for things of this kind; and I doubt it is CFI-attestable. Equinox ◑ 11:19, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Nice vehicle, but it seems Equinox is right. --Hekaheka (talk) 07:09, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

 * RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 07:47, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:IndyCycle


text:
Talk:skrupel

RFV discussion: July 2012
This Norwegian entry defines it as a length unit scruple, but no length unit is defined in the English entry. The word skrupel is not in the Norwegian online dictionary or in the encyclopedia SNL. The weight unit is listed in SNL as skruppel. Håkon (talk) 12:20, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, created by a banned sockpuppet of who also doesn't speak Norwegian. Mglovesfun (talk) 12:23, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Gone, striking. Mglovesfun (talk) 19:01, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:skrupel


text:
Talk:waray-waray

RFV discussion: July–October 2012
Portuguese. Couldn’t find anything durable. — Ungoliant (Falai) 00:03, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Actually I too spotted this in Category:Tbot entries (Portuguese) some weeks ago, tried to cite it and couldn't. Mglovesfun (talk) 20:33, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

 * RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 08:10, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:waray-waray


text:
Talk:homoganda

RFV discussion: July–October 2012
Equinox ◑ 18:18, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

 * I find zero hits on GB and Usenet. --BB12 (talk) 18:22, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Found one single Usenet hit. — Ungoliant (Falai) 19:00, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

 * Deleted. - -sche (discuss) 22:38, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:homoganda


text:
Talk:wolfcub

RFV discussion: July–August 2012
Tagged but not listed. Five citations, but need to be checked for typos/scannos. Mglovesfun (talk) 08:39, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I added links to the citations. — Ungoliant (Falai) 13:21, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
 * It looks good to me. --Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 18:11, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Striking as cited. bd2412 T 23:56, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:wolfcub


text:
Talk:woman's room

RFV discussion: August–September 2012
Looks like a misspelling of women's room to me. Also I'm not sure if either of them are attestable with this meaning (citing a room belonging to a woman is trivial). It's probably worth including if attested, compare boys' room, girls' room. Mglovesfun (talk) 09:33, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Cited --Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 16:51, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

 * RFV-passed. - -sche (discuss) 03:23, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:woman's room


text:
Talk:bydło

RFV discussion: August 2012
In English. Maro 12:46, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
 * A few examples of usage can be found here. Not exactly academic, but internet culture rarely is.
 * See WT:CFI. Mglovesfun (talk) 11:06, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Aside from attestability according to CFI, the internet term uses a regular l instead of the dark l Chuck Entz (talk) 12:43, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I'd attribute that to the fact that the dark l is a letter that is inaccessible to most people online, so while in practice the word has changed, in theory it remains the same.--31.205.26.42 18:33, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, yes, but that may mean that bydlo is attestable, but that bydło is not. --Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 23:49, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh. Makes sense. I guess I'll go ahead and edit that.--31.205.26.42 03:31, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Striking, since 31.205.26.42, who first added the English section, has now removed it. —Ruakh TALK 03:04, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:bydło


text:
Talk:bestshore

RFV discussion: August–September 2012
Ideal for navigation (best shore)?! Can't see it in Google Books at all. Thought it was something to do with bestshoring. Equinox ◑ 01:34, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Used by some businesses as a trade name, also as a model name by some businesses - but as a word? Nada. Collect (talk) 00:15, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

 * RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 03:43, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:bestshore


text:
Talk:nocturnavore

RFV discussion: August 2012
Ooh! Good thing we unblocked Luciferwildcat multiple times! Otherwise he might not have been able to add various pieces of unattestable bullshit! Help me out here, friends. Equinox ◑ 00:49, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

 * I’d expect that after having 8 out of 17 regulars voting to have him banned he’d learn the lesson: just because a certain string of characters resembles English, it doesn’t necessarily mean it’s an English word. Seriously, just find citations BEFORE you add an entry, Lucifer. — Ungoliant (Falai) 01:18, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Clearly "a person who eats the night". Um -- I just looked at the recent entries - many of which are "(arbitrary adjective)(arbitrary noun)" combinations and then the plurals as well!   And I kinda like "squaroid" which has essentially no recorded usages other than as a trademark .   I suggest that all of his recent words be examined closely. Cheers.   Collect (talk) 01:35, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

FYI, squaroid was on the "Wanted" list, should I not create them? Or does someone just make those up, what's going on?Lucifer (talk) 02:20, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
 * "Creation" is precisely the issue. Find words on the list which exist as findable words first - the "write the definition when no one has used the word" system is a failure.  Cheers. Collect (talk) 13:44, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Like the rest of Wiktionary, anyone can add to the wanted list. You have to use common sense and make sure they meet CFI before you add entries from the list (or from any source). In this case, it's apparently a protologism coined very recently for a McDonald's ad campaign. There are no hits whatsoever on Google Books or usenet, though it may very well survive long enough to meet CFI a year from now. Chuck Entz (talk) 06:48, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I suspect that even in the context of the McDonalds ad, the definition is wrong. -vore means a creature that eats in a certain way, so a nocturnavore is one who eats at night, not the habit of eating at night. Smurrayinchester (talk) 09:47, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Is there any sort of evidence for this? Something that's clearly unattestable can be speedy deleted. Mglovesfun (talk) 09:58, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Nah it's attestable on Twitter, that's it! Mglovesfun (talk) 10:04, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Following the logic of -vore word formation, you have herbivores that eat plants (Latin herba) and carnivores that eat meat (Latin carnis), but nocturna is an adjective, not a noun. Based on other Latin compounds such as noctivaga, I would guess that the correct form would be noctivore Chuck Entz (talk) 10:48, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Plenty of Google hits for but all in French. Nothing obvious for . SemperBlotto (talk) 10:55, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't expect there to be any. I was just speculating about what a correctly-formed protologism would look like. The French term seems to show I guessed right. Of course, usage doesn't follow etymological correctness. Nocturnavore stands a much better chance of being here a year from now than noctivore. As for the rfved term, MG has already speedied it as an open-and-shut protologism- no cites anywhere. Chuck Entz (talk) 11:14, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:nocturnavore


text:
Talk:pearl eye patch

RFV discussion: August 2012
Um ok... need quotes to support that. Jamesjiao → T ◊ C 00:38, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Was speedily deleted by Ruakh and then again by MK. - -sche (discuss) 04:31, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:pearl eye patch


text:
Talk:suy hao

RFV discussion: August 2012
Doesn't Vietnamese use tone marks? (And yes the entry needs cleaning up, I've contacted the user who created the entry about that) 13:47, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
 * There are a great many marks to differentiate between vowels, but not all the vowels have them. And yes, there are tone marks, but there's one tone that isn't marked.Chuck Entz (talk) 14:04, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

 * The are 21 Google Books hits for suy hao, of which 5 are accidental juxtapositions of other forms of suy or hao. That leaves 16 examples in running Vietnamese speech without the accents. I would say the spelling is citeable. I don't speak Vietnamese, so I can't tell if they support the definition, though. I haven't checked usenet. Chuck Entz (talk) 14:20, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Ok, I'm retracting my nomination then. Citations would still be nice, of course, but I was mainly worried about the spelling. 16:24, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:suy hao


text:
Talk:cothromas

RFV
I cannot attest this alleged Irish term. From among the hits found by, the only one looking like a use of the term seems to be in "Studies: Volume 60", 1971. --Dan Polansky (talk) 23:43, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Google books is hardly the place to be looking for words in Irish. If you look on regular Google and add the word "bhfuil" to filter out dictionary entries and the like, you find lots of uses of the word, which incidentally is listed in dictionaries as far back as Dinneen. —Angr 16:45, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Then the question is what are the durably archived sources of Irish quotations, and whether you would care to provide three links to these quotations. So please, if you do not want to copy and format attesting quotations to cothromas, at least provide three hyperlinks to them. --Dan Polansky (talk) 17:36, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The durably archived sources of Irish quotations are to be found in libraries, not on the Internet. Same as with all languages whose Web presence is minimal. —Angr 17:49, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
 * It is listed in Criteria for inclusion/Well documented languages so the three citation rule stands. Mglovesfun (talk) 17:56, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
 * But "well documented on the Internet" does not mean "well documented in what Wiktionary considers 'durably archived sources' on the Internet". I doubt if any of the languages on that list besides English and German are well documented in durably archived sources on the Internet. Our definition of "durably archived" basically requires real research of real dead-tree books for almost all languages besides those two. Also, WT:CFI says terms that have "clearly widespread use" don't need the 3 citations, and I think over 10,000 uses on websites--even those not considered "durably archived"--indicates clearly widespread use. For example, here and here are Acts of the Irish Government where the word cothromas is used in the Irish text and the word "equity" is used in the English text. Now, those URLs don't count as "durably archived" by Wiktionary standards because they could change at any time, but the Acts themselves aren't going anywhere and will presumably be findable in the archives of the Irish Government for as long as the state of Ireland exists. So can we list them or not? —Angr 18:17, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Or here is a usage of the term cothromas diúltach (RFVed two threads up) in a newspaper article from last February. Again, the URL itself is not considered "durably archived", but the paper edition of the newspaper is. Even if the URL disappears someday, all a person has to do is find a copy of Foinse in the library and look it up. So can that be listed as a citation of the word or not? —Angr 18:24, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

 * Great finds! Yes, laws and legislative acts are durably archived (as discussed here). And yes, if the newspaper has appeared in print, it can be cited just fine... it's no different than citing the Google Books copy rather than a 3D paper copy of a book, AFAICT. :) - -sche (discuss) 18:26, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
 * It does say on that page "This page may be modified through general consensus." The best way to cite this might be to argue to remove it from Wiktionary:Criteria for inclusion/Well documented languages. Mglovesfun (talk) 18:58, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Re: "I doubt if any of the languages on that list besides English and German are well documented in durably archived sources on the Internet": I beg to differ. From my experience, I have found almost all Czech words that I came across attested in Google books. Czech is a language with approximately 12 million native speakers. OTOH, as regards Irish in particular, Wikipedia tells me that "Around the turn of the 20th century, estimates of native speakers ranged from 20,000 to 80,000 people". --Dan Polansky (talk) 21:13, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I was exaggerating when I said only English and German, but in fact there is very little Irish at Google Books. There is enough Modern Irish literature published that it should almost always be possible to find 3 cites for any given lemma, but it may not always be possible to find those cites on line. Technical terms like these can probably be found, at the very least, in Irish-language textbooks, but the contents of those textbooks are probably not readily available on the Web. —Angr 21:40, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
 * How much Irish there is on Google books should better be figured out. "Irish" is not listed among Google books languages in advanced search. WT:About Irish would do well to guide us on where and how to look for attesting quotations. seems to feel free to add terms that have close to no web hits; a recent case in point is xéirifileach: . --Dan Polansky (talk) 22:24, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, gets less than 66,000 hits, and that's a form of the verb "to be" and thus an extremely common word in Irish. (It's also peculiarly enough spelled that all hits for will be in Irish and not in any other language.) I agree that Embryomystic adds too many "dictionary words" that have very little attestable usage, though I don't agree that they are "alleged Irish" or "would-be Irish". And cothromas, which has been attested in various spellings since the 9th century AD, is definitely not "alleged Irish". —Angr 22:45, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

 * While I agree with Mglovesfun that the best way to cite terms like this may be to remove Irish (and Welsh?) from the list of well-attested-online languages, I think I've cited this the old-fashioned way. - -sche (discuss) 01:21, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Where did you find the other two cites? Online or off? —Angr 08:48, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Online. I searched Google Books for inflected, lenited and eclipsed forms. - -sche (discuss) 18:53, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:cothromas


text:
Talk:scalie

RFV
Rfv-sense "Someone who describes themselves with a scalie character." What is this self-referential self-reference supposed to mean? - -sche (discuss) 06:18, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Meaningless. Removed. SemperBlotto (talk) 06:54, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

 * On second look, I think I've figured out what CodeCat was getting at: one of the senses of "scalie" is "in the furry fandom, a lizard with human characteristics", so this sense is "someone who roleplays such a lizard". I'm not sure the two are distinct. - -sche (discuss) 07:02, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
 * In the furry fandom, a furry is both the fictional character and the person who roleplays such a character (the definition we have at furry). The same applies to scalie as well. It's not at all obvious with only the first definition that the term can be used to refer to a person, too. 10:07, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Ok, what do you think of my changes to the definitions of [[furry]] and [[scalie]]? I'm guessing the previous definition of "describes themselves with a furry/scalie character" may have been trying to avoid words like "roleplay" that can be valuative. After more thought, I came up with "describes themselves as being a furry/scalie character", but for now I've left roleplay in the definition because I think it adds clarity. - -sche (discuss) 01:58, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
 * How about "anthropomorphic reptile"? ~ Röbin Liönheart (talk) 15:53, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
 * I believe the entire anthro reptile sense is an error. Look at : it seems the singular is scaly, and someone probably saw scalies and deduced the incorrect singular *scalie. Equinox ◑ 23:10, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

This entry should be revisited, per the last commenter. - -sche (discuss) 01:33, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:scalie


text:
Talk:anglar region

RFV discussion: August–October 2012
(anatomy): An angular portion of the stomach between the lesser curvature and the pylorus.

I have found this principally in a small number of works with Japanese authors. I think it is a misspelling or "angular region", in a sense connected to angulus. DCDuring TALK 02:55, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I see only two cites, from different authors but both suspiciously at Kyōto University. --Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 05:22, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Furthermore, neither of the Kyoto cites verify the given meaning. They both seem to be in a particle physics context rather than anatomy. Spinning Spark  17:05, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

 * I concur. I'm happy with a speedy deletion if that's possible in this case. --BB12 (talk) 17:11, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
 * BTW, I have also deleted two references I made to this page. --BB12 (talk) 21:46, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

 * RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 19:44, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:anglar region


text:
Talk:Weevac 6

RFV discussion: August–October 2012
I think this needs to meet WT:BRAND. —Ruakh TALK 04:55, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

 * LOL at the etymology... that a product would actually be named after its ability to evacuate specifically six wee babies. - -sche (discuss) 05:21, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

 * The cites do support the etymology... --Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 05:23, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

 * The name looks like it should be for a device that cleans up urine spills. Chuck Entz (talk) 13:39, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

 * Agree, clearly a brand name. Note: Usage example has Weevac-6 with a hyphen, not consistent with page title. Equinox ◑ 02:49, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

 * RFV-failed / deleted. - -sche (discuss) 19:46, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:Weevac 6


text:
Talk:trailer trash

RFV discussion: August–October 2012
RFV of this sense of the noun: "Deleted from the movie trailer. Not included in theatrical run." It's defined as an adjective, but I can't reformulate the definition until I can see some citations to get an idea of what it does mean and how it's used. - -sche (discuss) 02:36, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The trailer is supposed to be the best of what is in the movie. What would be deleted from the trailer would not be especially bad, but would probably be in the movie. The most intelligible film-related usage in this sense that I found was the intro to a film review column . DCDuring TALK 03:15, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

 * If it helps anyone searching for usage of the term: consider the possibility that it means "scenes that appear in the trailer but were, after the release of the trailer but before the release of the film, deleted from the film". - -sche (discuss) 03:25, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Interesting possibility, defying normal economic logic. DCDuring TALK 03:48, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

 * I found some hits, but I don't think any support that meaning:, , . In any case, I think this meaning would just be the sum of parts, not so? --BB12 (talk) 05:23, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

 * The trailer for America's Sweethearts had scenes that weren't in the movie; sometimes what works in clips doesn't work in context.--Prosfilaes (talk) 06:43, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

 * RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 22:44, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:trailer trash


text:
Talk:politifact

RFV discussion: August–September 2012
I think this is a protologism; there are a lot of Google Book hits, but they refer to the name of a website, not to a noun. Mglovesfun (talk) 17:17, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

 * Speedy-deleted. I think the purpose of the protologism is precisely to besmirch said website — see e.g. http://www.dailykos.com/comments/1121283/47187247#c48 — and we shouldn't let Wiktionary be hijacked this way. (Not that I disagree with the besmirching. PolitiFact is not very good at its job. But that's not what Wiktionary is for.) —Ruakh TALK 01:56, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:politifact


text:
Talk:sapiosexual

adjective?
Isn't that an adjective as well? Kampy (talk) 20:46, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

 * Sometimes. Not often enough that an adjective section would meet Wiktionary's Criteria for Inclusion (at least, that's what the abovementioned Request for Verification determined), but perhaps in a few years... - -sche (discuss) 22:24, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Sapiosexual pride flag?
Why never the word sapiosexuality/allosexuality when there's the pride-flag for either asexuality, pansexuality or polysexuality? THAT kind of question is THE proof of how insane either FGM/MGM or a forced marriage/divorce could be. --Lo Ximiendo (talk) 14:37, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Not just "attracted"...
...but romantically and/or sexually attracted? Perhaps the def needs tweaking. Equinox ◑ 21:50, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

RFV discussion: August–September 2012
Seems pretty borderline. Mglovesfun (talk) 17:50, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

 * It was previously deleted after being tagged, but it's apparently never been listed on WT:RFV (until now)... bd seems to have deleted it after Requests for verification archive/2012? Well, let's give it its month and see if more citations have come online since March. - -sche (discuss) 18:42, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I think there might be three Usenet citations, but possibly not used in any published works at all. Mglovesfun (talk) 20:31, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

 * I was able to attest this as a noun, but not as an adjective. See Citations:sapiosexual. Astral (talk) 00:55, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Origin
I just wanted to leave this link here. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 03:09, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

title: Talk:sapiosexual


text:
Talk:Maegth

RFV discussion: August–October 2012
Supposedly a female given name. I see absolutely no relevant hits on Google Books for "dear Maegth", "named Maegth", "called Maegth", "her Maegth", "Ms/Mrs/Miss Maegth", "love Maegth", "inauthor:Maegth". There are also no relevant hits on Usenet, AFAICT. - -sche (discuss) 19:42, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
 * If you search Images for "Maegth", and page forward, you will eventually begin to see Facebook titles (Maegth Valonia, Maegth Efia, etc.) of lede with the name. Leasnam (talk) 20:03, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
 * On the one hand, if people with that name exist, their births should be public record (and may also have been announced in papers); it's also possible they did newsworthy things and got in papers for that. On the other hand, when I search on Facebook, I see only the 2 distinct individuals whose pictures appear in that Google Images search plus 2 others, and a handful of other people with the last name Maegth (which is also otherwise unattested), and people have been known to use fake names on Facebook ... and I see nothing relevant when I search Google News and Google Scholar for "Maegth". So I'm not willing to assume it's attested until there's more solid evidence. I'm currently trying to see if any of the baby-name websites make claims about how common a name it is for children born in particular years, which would at least imply the existence of birth records. - -sche (discuss) 20:28, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I see what you're saying. Well, personally, I'v never met anyone named "Maegth", and were I to, I wouldn't think the name was weird, just uncommon. It kinda sounds like Megan. Leasnam (talk) 20:41, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Probably not evidence we could use, but a search on ancestry.com (I'm subscribed to the site, so I tried it, just out of curiosity) for an exact match to "Maegth" as a first name found no hits- and their database includes birth, marriage and death records for the UK, the US, Australia, and other countries. They don't have as good coverage for the most recent decades, and the older records are transcribed from paper and microform sources, so it's not conclusive. Searching for a non-exact match turned up millions of hits, but anything with an "M" followed by an "a" and ending with anything remotely like "th" is included (for example: "Massoud"). This type of permissive search can be very useful when there's other information to narrow down the scope, but for our purposes, it's pretty much useless. Chuck Entz (talk) 07:03, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for checking. - -sche (discuss) 07:51, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Oddly enuff, I look'd about a bit and found Maegth as a last name (seemingly French!). My guess is that the last name isn't rooted on the meaning of maiden but one other meanings ... but that is only a guess. There's even a maegth.com. It is a conundrum that babyname sites list it as a girl's name that seemingly isn't noted but then they list a lot of odd names beginning with "Mae". However, it is listed and listed as meaning "maiden" which would be befitting for a given name. Now, I'm somewhat gewiss that they aren't only throwing words out. Somewhere, whether in life or fiction, someone must have noted these odd names. I would think it would hav been more of way to talk to a yung lady as title like one might say the "maid Marian", one might hav said "maegth Marian". This could hav been an oral thing. But that is all guesswork. I'm only throwing out how it might hav work'd its way onto a list of baby names. However, the question becomes, do we want an entry that has maegth with the meaning of maiden in case someone decides to verify the meaning found on a babyname site? (It is one of the meanings of the word and ties this to the other rfv.) Further, do we want to say that it is also a last name and listed as a first name? Or do we even care about names on Wiktionary? --AnWulf ... Ferþu Hal! (talk) 13:44, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

 * RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 22:58, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:Maegth


text:
Talk:28 Days Later zombie

RFV discussion: September 2012
The one citation in the entry, which is arguably actually of "non-28 Days Later zombie" and/or SOP, is the only citation I can find. - -sche (discuss) 23:12, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Looks like tosh. Nothing citeable I can find on Google Books. ---> Tooironic (talk) 13:37, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I think so too. In zombie fandom, the debate's between "slow zombies" vs "fast zombies". ~ Röbin Liönheart (talk) 22:06, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

 * RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 05:15, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

The definition and citation were:
 * 1) (informal) A non-, characterised by the  of the ability to  and.
 * 2) * 2011 November 3, "RT" (username), Cylon-like test mannequin, in alt.battlestar-galactica, Usenet:
 * As recently as 2009, the PETMAN — or Protection Ensemble Test Mannequin — was little more than a circuit board connected to hydraulics that terminated in mannequin feet. Now it weighs 180 pounds, looks like the Terminator with the skin burned off, walks much faster than any non-28 Days Later zombie and can do a push-up.

title: Talk:28 Days Later zombie


text:
Talk:magia ploma

RFV discussion: September–October 2012
Nothing on Google Books or Groups. — Ungoliant (Falai) 21:00, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Also no entry for ploma. Mglovesfun (talk) 22:28, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

 * RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 06:28, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Btw, there is plomo, of which ploma is presumably a feminine form. - -sche (discuss) 06:29, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:magia ploma


text:
Talk:at loose ends

RFV discussion: September 2012
Rfv-sense: In an uncertain position or situation
 * I am really at loose ends about this choice, I am between the proverbial rock and hard place.

I don't think so. See. DCDuring TALK 03:48, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

 * The American Heritage Dictionary has that meaning. Also, OED has "not regularly occupied", and "unsettled" as separate meanings for the noun.  Spinning Spark  06:26, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Withdrawn. Please insert the cite. DCDuring TALK 11:32, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
 * I didn't think we cited dictionaries. Spinning Spark  17:59, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
 * My mistake. It could go under a References header near the end of the L2 section. DCDuring TALK 18:32, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Some cites that are definitely, and some that might be that sense Spinning Spark  22:05, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Excellent. They all look good. All but one seem dated, which might account for why it seemed a bit strange to me in this sense. I usually check some of the older dictionaries, but hadn't this time. I have added the Webster 1913 wording to capture what I think is the older usage. I will search for citations for what I think is missing: "idle, bored", which Collins has. They also have at a loose end, which they think is more widely distributed. A lesser source has a at a loose end as UK with the "idle, bored" sense and at loose ends with the "uncertain" sense. Thus cites seem helpful, even necessary. DCDuring TALK 23:13, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Also see loose ends and loose end. DCDuring TALK 01:22, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:at loose ends


text:
Talk:Baroko

RFV discussion: September 2012
I don't see a single durably archived cite in English. I'm sure Webster has their sources, but I just can't imagine what those sources are. --Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 13:00, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Cited by Equinox. Struck. --Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 13:11, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:Baroko


text:
Talk:dhagher

RFV discussion: September 2012
Esperanto and Ido. —Ruakh TALK 22:04, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

 * I would speedy delete it. It can't be a noun in Esperanto, as it doesn't end in o; dh is never found in Esperanto (it's not inconcievable that it'll show up in some compound, but normally) and gh is never pronounced g--either g'h, like flug-haveno, or dʒ in old-school ASCII-izations. I believe programmer in Esperanto is programisto (for the occupation) or pragamanto (for someone who happens to be programming); in any case, it's going to be the verb + isto or -anto.

 * Likewise, Ido singular nouns end in o, and I would bet that the noun would be formed regularly from the verb there also.--Prosfilaes (talk) 23:38, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Shot on sight as an obvious hoax. Mglovesfun (talk) 09:18, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:dhagher


text:
Talk:rided bitch

RFV discussion: September 2012
This is said to be a nonstandard form, but I can find no clear example of it online- even on regular Google search. The few hits I can find are rided and bitch coincidentally occurring next to each other, generally in separate clauses or sentences. Chuck Entz (talk) 00:31, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Somewhat related discussion: Tea room. - -sche (discuss) 00:44, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

 * Speedily deleted. - -sche (discuss) 05:28, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:rided bitch


text:
Talk:mugwump

"A small, ferocious creature"? That may be a reference to a game in BASIC Computer Games (1978) to find four "mugwumps" hiding in a 10×10 grid. ~ Röbin Liönheart (talk) 21:45, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

RFV discussion: September 2012
Rfv-sense "A small, ferocious creature." Added in this edit. - -sche (discuss) 22:58, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Dubious. Note the name of the editor proposing that definition. Collect (talk) 23:11, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedied (justifiably, IMO) by Collect. - -sche (discuss) 19:17, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:mugwump


text:
Talk:neechee

RFV discussion: September 2012
I can find it as a name (of unclear derivation) and sometimes in Ojibwe or other Native American sentences, but I see no BGC hits for "a neechee", and the hits for "neechees" seem to be cases of "Ahwahneechees" or "Occaneechees" split across two lines. - -sche (discuss) 21:40, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The alternative form "nitchie" seems to be attested (so if this spelling isn't attested, move it thither), though it may need a "sometimes offensive" tag rather than merely "pejorative". - -sche (discuss) 21:42, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

 * I entered it, which means I read it in running text somewhere. God knows what I was reading at the time though, I'll try and work it out.. EDIT – just realised it's in the OED, with plenty of cites (and a bewildering variety of different spellings). Ƿidsiþ 06:41, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
 * If they have enough for this spelling, I'll take your word for it, you don't need to enter them. I am still tempted to make "nitchie" the lemma, as it seems rather more common... but we should check all the alternate spellings for commonness, first. What else have they got? ("Nichi" is unfortunately hard to search for as it is also Japanese.) - -sche (discuss) 07:01, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
 * "Forms: 17–18 neejee, 18 nee-chee, 18 nichi, 18 nichiwa, 18 nidge, 18 nitche, 18 nitchee, 18 nitchy, 18– neechee, 19– neche, 19– neeche, 19– nitchie." I think I agree that nitchie seems slightly more common for a lemma. Ƿidsiþ 07:06, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

 * I've made nitchie the lemma, but kept neechee since the OED has citations. - -sche (discuss) 03:12, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:neechee


text:
Talk:QAQ

RFV discussion: September 2012
"Quietly Asked Questions". Seems to exist in this sense only relating to one particular Red Dwarf FAQ, where it is some nonce humorous variant of the usual FAQ. Equinox ◑ 23:46, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:QAQ


text:
Talk:ædœotomy

RFV discussion: September–October 2012
I checked Google Books for this spelling, as well as aedoeotomy and edeotomy, but didn't see 3 uses of any spelling. - -sche (discuss) 00:17, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

 * Speedy delete: dictionary‐only term added by accident. --Æ&Œ (talk) 02:26, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

 * RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 20:30, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:ædœotomy


text:
Talk:cœnædœitis

RFV discussion: September–October 2012
Again, is this attested in any spelling? - -sche (discuss) 00:28, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

 * Looking at this word is like trying to interpret an optician's letter chart from thirty feet. Equinox ◑ 00:35, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

 * Speedy delete: dictionary‐only term added by accident. --Æ&Œ (talk) 02:28, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

 * RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 20:31, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:cœnædœitis


text:
Talk:clambake

RFV discussion: September 2012
RFV of the verb, which was added by an IP in 2005. The rest of the entry also needs formatting. - -sche (discuss) 07:30, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

 * Cited from Groups Judging from the spelling, most of those users were probably stoned while writing those posts, but hey, nothing in CFI says the citations have to be from sober people, right? Smurrayinchester (talk) 16:16, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Added ing-form and infinitive cites to show it is not just a denominal adjective. DCDuring TALK 18:28, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

 * Other dictionaries additionally define the noun along the lines of 'an informal, noisily sociable party', MWOnline said, "especially a political rally". DCDuring TALK 18:33, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

 * Alright, the verb (specifically the intransitive sense; the transitive sense was never tagged) passes RFV. - -sche (discuss) 22:15, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:clambake


text:
Talk:Eartha Kitt

RFV
Allegedly means "shit". --Dan Polansky (talk) 17:42, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Added four citations. They suggest this isn't just used in Scotland, but England as well. Astral (talk) 19:00, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The 2006 citation is a mention, IMO; the 2007 citation is iffy; the 2009 and 2011 citations are good. - -sche (discuss) 19:29, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
 * I'd count 2006 as a use, since it strikes me more as an example of using the term rather than just mentioning it, but added three more cites for good measure. Astral (talk) 21:26, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Both certainly have all the characteristics of rhyming slang, so it's not as implausible as it might look at first glance. Chuck Entz (talk) 21:43, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

 * Passes, IMO. - -sche (discuss) 22:49, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Passed. - -sche (discuss) 02:03, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:Eartha Kitt


text:
Talk:C.P.U.

RFV discussion: September 2012
I wanted to delete this on sight but there may be some truth to it. Can anyone confirm it? 12:54, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

 * Perhaps a mistake for CPA (Certified Public Accountant sense)? I got one relevant gbooks hit for "CPU certified" but unlikely that Canadian Paperworkers Union was meant. Spinning Spark  13:53, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Couldn't find any likely sense at Acronym Finder. DCDuring TALK 14:48, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:C.P.U.


text:
Talk:terimah kasih

RFV discussion: September 2012
A native Malay speaker (User:Amir Hamzah 2008) nominated this for deletion (replacing the entire entry with ) in the old format, which had Indonesian only. Not sure what he meant but the expression exists in both Malay and Indonesian. --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 07:28, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

 * I have now reformatted entry, asked the nominator but would like to check with someone if the entry is OK otherwise. I don't know Malay or Indonesian but the phrase is often used in online tutorials. --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 07:30, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

 * Actually, User:Amir Hamzah 2008 confirmed the correctness of the meaning by editing thank you - the Malay translation. I suspect he just didn't like the "Indonesian" heading or maybe he meant that the Indonesian translation was incorrect. Very strange. --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 07:37, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

 * Never mind. He has removed the tag and edited the entry. --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 07:39, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
 * It now says Common misspelling of terima kasih. I'm striking the title, if anyone if not happy with this please unstrike and continue the debate. Mglovesfun (talk) 21:49, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:terimah kasih


text:
Talk:Gott in Himmel

RFV discussion
Same as above. This a fairly standard phrase for writers to put in the mouths of German characters to make it more clear they're German, but I don't think it's a standard English phrase. The citation given is said by a character called Karl Kreuzer who also says Herr Jesus and potz tausend with incredible regularity, and the other hits I've found on Google book search are similar. Is this English, or should the heading change to German? Smurrayinchester (talk) 15:34, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Edit Poking around in the page history, it seems this was once marked as German, but it was changed to English because "Gott in Himmel" is not grammatical German (it should be "Gott im Himmel"). This puts us in a weird situation - this is basically an English misspelling of a German phrase and so it's not strictly a word/phrase in any language. I might have to move this to RFD. Smurrayinchester (talk) 15:40, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I'd think that if it's found in English print works unitalicized (unless clearly foreign words are also unitalicized in the same work), then it qualifies as English. (All the more so in light of the in instead of im.) The question IMO is only what if it's only attested sufficiently italicized: do we say that those cites count for German? Methinks not, but me's open to being convinced otherwise. —msh210℠ (talk) 15:50, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Hmm, here's one example where "Gott in Himmel" is not italicised, but in petto on the previous page is (though "Mein Gott" and "tyfel" (i.e. Teufel) are also unitalicised). Smurrayinchester (talk) 16:05, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
 * This text also uses the odd colloquialism mynheer, probably for .  These appear to be used to indicate the idiosyncrasies of the character's speech.
 * What's the WT take on such oddities? Do we treat them as nonces, protologisms, something else?  -- Eiríkr Útlendi │ Tala við mig 16:12, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
 * It's from Dutch, apparently - mynheer. From the looks of it, the character is meant to be Dutch, but the author freely swaps between German and Dutch. Smurrayinchester (talk) 21:46, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Any chance then that Gott in Himmel might be grammatical in some Low German variety? -- Eiríkr Útlendi │ Tala við mig 22:22, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Dunno. I was just thinking it might be grammatical in Yiddish, or rather that might be. You'd expect Low German to spell it "God" (because of the absence of the High German consonant shift changing d to t), but final devoicing would mean it would wind up being pronounced with /t/ anyway. —Angr 22:31, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

I've added some citations. Two did not have italics, one did not have an exclamation mark, and one was a noun (not an interjection). --BB12 (talk) 05:40, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I came across those while I was writing up this RFV. The trouble is that I'm not sure how many, if any, are of it being used in English. Some are obvious - in Fauquier County in the Revolution, the character who says "Gott in Himmel" says, in the previous paragraph, "Was ist los?", to which the reply is "Amerikaner!" The book is clear that he's speaking in German to show that he's too shocked by the battle to speak English. The character in Murder at Hale's Ferry is a Prussian who speaks a kind of weird European eye-dialect, full of "Gott-damned"s and "yah"s. The Long Growing Season looks legit, though - although the characters all have German names, their conversation is in fluent English apart from the frequent "Gott in himmel!"s (the fact they don't capitalise "himmel" is a sign it's drifted even further from the original German). This really comes down the the issue Eirikr was asking about above - what do we do with foreignisms like these, which are used in English only to make dialogue look more foreign? Smurrayinchester (talk) 08:47, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

 * FWIW, my grandmother who didn't really speak German (one high school class) used the expression, and I consider it part of my vocabulary, though I don't know if I've ever used it. Ultimately, it seems common enough to warrant inclusion as an English entry, unlike, say, some of the Louisiana French used in the book "Divine Secrets of the Ya-Ya Sisterhood." --BB12 (talk) 17:45, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

 * It's attested, so it should exist in some L2 section. And it isn't grammatical in German, so it isn't ==German==. By process of elimination, it must be a malformed ==English== . - -sche (discuss) 19:04, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
 * That sounds like a fair solution, though it should have a note somewhere emphasising that it's not correct German. Smurrayinchester (talk) 20:40, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't understand that logic, -sche. You say it can't be German because it doesn't fit German's grammar, so it must be English. Don't you really mean that it doesn't fit German's vocabulary? (It uses English in instead of German im.) But then why can't you as easily say it can't be English because it doesn't fit English's vocabulary, so it must be German? Or, perhaps easiest of all, say it's German, and uses indefinite Himmel? —msh210℠ (talk) 20:47, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
 * There is a refutable presumption that terms which appear in (e.g.) English-language texts are English. You can refute this presumption by showing that the term is a term in another language and not in English. Wiktionary's structure is such that doing only the second half of that, i.e. showing that the term is not a term in English, is not possible: pages must have language statements. Compare [[Talk:ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn]]. As EP suggested there, perhaps "we should explain with Usage notes that the phrase appears in English fiction, and so is technically English, but is intended to represent" German. It is, however, not German: if you would like to show that it is, you must cite it in German-language texts. - -sche (discuss) 22:17, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Alternatively, what if the page's content was moved to Gott im Himmel, and Gott in Himmel becomes "Misspelling of Gott im Himmel" (or perhaps "Low German"/"Dialectal")? It does seem to be valid in some forms of Low German; here's what seems to be a character speaking Low German (judging from his "Ick heff") - he says what is clearly "Gott in Himmel". At any rate, this is citeable in German, so perhaps this is the best solution (unlike Cthulhu fhtagn, which is just nonsense syllables, Gott in Himmel is at least supposedly German). Smurrayinchester (talk) 09:27, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Hm, so have an entry for Gott im Himmel, and make Gott in Himmel #German, defining it as, possible with  thrown in because "im" is 23 times more common on GBC? That's doable, although Gott in Himmel would need citations — as I dispute that the current, English citations can be used to support it. - -sche (discuss) 05:11, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
 * seems a good approach; users will look up common misspellings, even if uncommon among native speakers. ~ Robin (talk) 17:16, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

I made this same point in gewiss above:

Let's back up and look at the criteria for inclusion:

A term should be included if it's likely that someone would run across it and want to know what it means.

Further, if needed, … Usage in permanently recorded media, conveying meaning, in at least three independent instances spanning at least a year …

Truly, does noting in insted of im make this any more "English"? It should stand or fall on the whole phrase rather than a misspelling. I'v seen this often enuff in English writings to say that it should stay given the rules I quoted above.

Now, as I understand it, it's being naysaid for that it is being noted to add a German "taste" or "flavor" to the writing and, therefore, it doesn't belong under an English heading even tho it is found in sundry English writings.

What I'm trying to point out is that this reason for exclusion doesn't exist; there isn't such a sub-clause against inclusion … at least not that I'v seen. If there is, then it needs to be applied across the board.

If we're going to start tightening the entry requirements so that these words and phrases don't go under the broader English heading (words found and noted in English writings), then it should apply across the board. Avant garde, apres, au revoir, asf should be under French; nyet under Russian, purdah under Persian, mirabile dictu under Latin, asf. We'll be very busy cleansing English of these foreign words and phrases if we go that way.

So I guess the broader frain is whether the English heading is only for "English" words or is it a broader heading for words found in English writings or can be noted in English writings, with a reasonable expectation of understanding. I go with the latter, but if it is the former, then a rule needs to be written but be aware that you're opening up a can of subjectiv worms. --AnWulf ... Ferþu Hal! (talk) 19:13, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

 * This talk seems to come up see talk:avant la lettre every so often and it boils down to the same two stances. If avant la lettre made it thru, then so should Gott in Himmel. --AnWulf ... Ferþu Hal! (talk) 13:33, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

 * I have converted the entry into a German misspelling per my comment of 05:11, 25 May 2012, per this discussion and because of the citations found of this spelling in dialect-influenced German texts. - -sche (discuss) 07:50, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

 * Resolved / RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 21:22, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:Gott in Himmel


text:
User:DCDuring/List of sequenced animal genone/List of sequenced animal genomes 2016

Parazoa

 * Amphimedon queenslandica, Amphimedon, a sponge (2009 )

 * Trichoplax adhaerens, Trichoplax, a Placozoan (2008 )

Cnidaria

 * Hydra magnipapillata, Hydra, a model medusozoan (2010 )

 * Nematostella vectensis, Nematostella, a model anemone (starlet sea anemone) (2007 )

Echinoderms

 * Strongylocentrotus purpuratus, a sea urchin and model deuterostome, Strongylocentrotus (2006 )

Hemichordates

 * Saccoglossus kowalevskii, Saccoglossus, an acorn worm (2009) )

Urochordates

 * Ciona intestinalis, a tunicate, Ciona (2003 )

 * Ciona savignyi, a tunicate Ciona (2007 )

Cephalochordates

 * Branchiostoma floridae, a lancelet Branchiostoma (2008 )

Cyclostomes

 * Petromyzon marinus, a lamprey Petromyzon (2009 )

Cartilaginous Fish

 * Callorhinchus milii, an elephant shark Callorhinchus (2007 )

Bony Fish

 * Danio rerio, Danio a zebrafish (2007 ) (order Cypriniformes)

 * Gadus morhua, Gadus, Atlantic cod (2011 ) (order Gadiformes)

 * Gasterosteus aculeatus, Gasterosteus, three-spined stickleback (2006, 2012 ) (order Gasterosteiformes)

 * Latimeria chalumnae, Latimeria, West Indian Ocean coelacanth and oldest known living lineage of Sarcopterygii (order Coelacanthiformes)

 * Oryzias latipes, Oryzias, medaka (2007) (order Beloniformes)

 * Takifugu rubripes, Takifugu, a puffer fish ( International Fugu Genome Consortium 2002 ) (order Tetraodontiformes)

 * Tetraodon nigroviridis, Tetraodon, a puffer fish (2004 ) (order Tetraodontiformes)

Amphibians

 * Xenopus tropicalis, Western clawed frog Xenopus (2010 )

Reptiles and Birds

 * Anolis carolinensis, Anolis, JBL SC #1, green anole lizard (2011 )
 * Ficedula albicollis, Ficedula, collared flycatcher (2012 )

 * Ficedula hypoleuca, pied flycatcher Ficedula (2012 )

 * Gallus gallus, Gallus, chicken (2004 )

 * Meleagris gallopavo, Meleagris'', domesticated turkey (2011 )

 * Taeniopygia guttata, Taeniopygia, zebra finch (2010 )

Mammals

 * Ailuropoda melanoleuca, Ailuropoda, giant panda (2010 )

 * Bos grunniens, Bos, yak 2012

 * Bos primigenius taurus, Bos primigenius, cow 2009

 * Callithrix jacchus, Callithrix, marmoset (2010 )

 * Canis lupus familiaris, dog (2005 )

 * Equus ferus caballus, Equus ferus, horse (2009 )

 * Erinaceus europaeus, Erinaceus, Western European hedgehog

 * Felis silvestris catus, cat (2007 )

 * Gorilla gorilla, Gorilla, gorilla (2012 )

 * Homo sapiens, Homo, Human (Draft 2001 Complete 2006 )

 * Homo neanderthalensis, Human (Neanderthal) (Draft 2010 )

 * Loxodonta africana, Loxodonta, African elephant (2009 )

 * Macaca mulatta, Macaca, rhesus macaque (2007 )

 * Macropus eugenii, Macropus, kangaroo (2011 )

 * Monodelphis domestica, Monodelphis, gray short-tailed Opossum (2007 )

 * Mus musculus, Mus Strain: C57BL/6J, Mouse (2002 )

 * Myotis lucifugus, Myotis, little brown bat (2010 )

 * Ornithorhynchus anatinus, Ornithorhynchus, platypus (2007 )

 * Oryctolagus cuniculus, Oryctolagus, rabbit (2010 )

 * Otolemur garnettii, Otolemur, small-eared galago, or bushbaby

 * Pan paniscus, Pan bonobo (2012 )

 * Pan troglodytes, chimpanzee (2005 )

 * Pongo pygmaeus/Pongo abelii, Pongo orangutan (Borneo/Sumatra) (2011 )

 * Rattus norvegicus, Rattus rat (2004 )

 * Sarcophilus harrisii, Sarcophilus, Tasmanian devil

 * Sus scrofa, Pig (2012 )

 * Tursiops truncatus, Tursiops, bottlenosed dolphin (2012 )

Insects

 * Acromyrmex echinatior colony Ae372 Acromyrmex Ant (Panamanian leafcutter) (2011 )

 * Acyrthosiphon pisum, Aphid Acyrthosiphon (Pea aphid) (2010 )

 * Aedes aegypti Strain:LVPib12, Aedes Mosquito (Vector of dengue fever, etc.) (2007 )

 * Anopheles gambiae Strain: PEST, Anopheles Mosquito (Vector of malaria) (2002 )

 * Anopheles gambiae Strain: M, Mosquito Anopheles (Vector of malaria) (2010 )

 * Anopheles gambiae Strain: S, Mosquito (Vector of malaria) (2010 )

 * Apis mellifera Bee (Honey bee), Apis (Model for eusocial behavior) (2006 )

 * Atta cephalotes, Ant Atta (Leaf-cutter ant) (2011 )

 * Bombyx mori Strain:p50T, Bombyx Moth (Domestic silk worm) (2004 )

 * Camponotus floridanus, Ant Camponotus(2010 )

 * Culex quinquefasciatus, Mosquito Culex (Vector of West Nile virus, filariasis etc.) (2010 )

 * Drosophila ananassae, Fruit fly Drosophila (2007 )

 * Drosophila biarmipes, Fruit fly (2011 )

 * Drosophila bipectinata, Fruit fly (2011 )

 * Drosophila erecta, Fruit fly (2007 )

 * Drosophila elegans, Fruit fly (2011 )

 * Drosophila eugracilis, Fruit fly (2011 )

 * Drosophila ficusphila, Fruit fly (2011 )

 * Drosophila grimshawi, Fruit fly (2007 )

 * Drosophila kikkawai, Fruit fly (2011 )

 * Drosophila melanogaster, Fruit fly (Model organism) (2000 )

 * Drosophila mojavensis, Fruit fly (2007 )

 * Drosophila persimilis, Fruit fly (2007 )

 * Drosophila pseudoobscura, Fruit fly (2005 )

 * Drosophila rhopaloa, Fruit fly (2011 )

 * Drosophila santomea, Fruit fly

 * Drosophila sechellia, Fruit fly (2007 )

 * Drosophila simulans, Fruit fly (2007 )

 * Drosophila takahashi, Fruit fly (2011 )

 * Drosophila virilis, Fruit fly (2007 )

 * Drosophila willistoni, Fruit fly (2007 )

 * Drosophila yakuba, Fruit fly (2007 )

 * Herpegnathos saltator, Ant Herpegnathos (2010 )

 * Linepithema humile, Ant Linepithema (Argentine ant) (2011 )

 * Nasonia giraulti, Wasp Nasonia (Parasitoid wasp) (2010 )

 * Nasonia longicornis, Wasp (Parasitoid wasp) (2010 )

 * Nasonia vitripennis, Wasp (Parasitoid wasp; Model organism) (2010 )

 * Pediculus humanus, Louse Pediculus (Sucking louse; Parasite) (2010 )

 * Pogonomyrmex barbatus, Ant Pogonomyrmex (red harvester ant) (2011 )

 * Solenopsis invicta, Ant Solenopsis (fire ant) (2011 )

 * Tribolium castaneum Strain:GA-2, Tribolium Beetle (Red flour beetle) (2008 )

Crustaceans

 * Daphnia pulex, Daphnia Water flea (2007  )

Chelicerates

 * Ixodes scapularis, Ixodes deer tick (vector of meningitis and Lyme disease) (2008 )

 * , Tetranychus spider mite (2011 )

Molluscs

 * Crassostrea gigas, Crassostrea Pacific oyster (2012 )

Platyhelminthes

 * Clonorchis sinensis, Clonorchis Liver fluke (Human pathogen) (Draft 2011 )

 * Schistosoma haematobium, Schistosoma Schistosome (Human pathogen) (2012 )

 * Schistosoma japonicum, Schistosome (Human pathogen) (2009 )

 * Schistosoma mansoni, Schistosome (Human pathogen) (2009, 2012 )

 * Schmidtea mediterranea, Schmidtea Planarian (Model organism) (2006 )

Nematodes

 * Ascaris suum, Ascaris Human pathogen (2011 )

 * Brugia malayi Strain:TRS Brugia, Human pathogen (2007 )

 * Caenorhabditis briggsae Caenorhabditis (2003 )

 * Caenorhabditis elegans  Strain:Bristol N2, Model organism (1998 )

 * Meloidogyne hapla, Meloidogyne Northern root-knot nematode (Plant pathogen) (2008 )

 * Meloidogyne incognita, Southern root-knot nematode (Plant pathogen) (2008 )

 * Pristionchus pacificus, Pristionchus Model invertebrate (2008 )

Annelids

 * Capitella teleta, Capitella Polychaete (2007 )

 * Helobdella robusta, Helobdella Leech (2007 )


text: băs

title: băs


text:
dégrayer

Verb

 * 1)  to take off one's outer garments (such as coat, hat or gloves)

title: dégrayer


text: abidings

title: abidings


text: iarnã

title: iarnã


text:
drásticu

Adjective

 * 1) drastic

title: drásticu


text:
inmediatu

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) immediate

title: inmediatu


text: lãngoare

title: lãngoare


text:
feamin

Etymology
Possibly from a, from. Compare 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Adjective

 * 1) feminine

title: feamin


text: heamin

title: heamin


text:
Wiktionary talk:Images

RFM
This page contains mostly information on how to use images. So it may be renamed to Help:Images. --Daniel. 20:08, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I'd prefer splitting this into Wiktionary:Images for the standards and policies and Help:Images for the instructional material, but if there isn't enough content for that, then I guess Help:Images would be a better title. --Yair rand 01:59, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Split. - -sche (discuss) 23:38, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

title: Wiktionary talk:Images


text:
Template talk:cst

RFM
The names "Northern Costanoan" and "Southern Costanoan" (rather than "Northern Ohlone", "Southern Ohlone") seem more common for the individual languages, but the family seems to be more commonly called "Ohlone", so I don't know if the languages should be renamed or not. But I'm listing this info here for discussion. - -sche (discuss) 04:50, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
 * I prefer the names as they are, as 'Ohlone'. My experience has been that the few people I have known who knew any of an Ohlone language rarely if ever said "Costanoan", and that "Costanoan" tends to be from older ethnographic studies. --Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 05:20, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

title: Template talk:cst


text:
Template talk:css

RFM
See Template talk:cst. - -sche (discuss) 03:24, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

title: Template talk:css


text:
bilă

Etymology 1
, from.

Noun

 * 1) bile

Etymology 2
.

Noun

 * 1) small, hard ball
 * 2)  ball

Etymology 3
.

Noun

 * 1) thin tree trunk used in construction

title: bilă


text:
शेंग

Noun

 * 1) bean, pod

title: शेंग


text:
Myotis

Etymology
, from stem of  +, stem of.

Hypernyms

 * ; - subfamily

Hyponyms

 * (= (greater mouse-eared bat))
 * ,, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , (Brandt's bat), , , , , , , , , ,  , , , , ,  (Geoffroy's bat), , , , ,  , , , , , , , , , , ,  , , , , , , ,  , , ,  , , , , , , , , , ,  , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,  , , , ,  , , , , , , , , , ,

title: Myotis


text:
モトクロス

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  motocross

title: モトクロス


text:
veashtid

Etymology
Either from, from , or alternatively from from. Compare 🇨🇬.

Adjective

 * 1) withered, faded

title: veashtid


text: iadirã

title: iadirã


text:
Myotis lucifugus

Hypernyms

 * - order; - family,  - subfamily;  - genus

Hyponyms

 * ,, , , - subspecies

title: Myotis lucifugus


text:
פלא

Noun

 * 1) miracle
 * 2) wonder

title: פלא


text:
Ailuropoda

Etymology
From.

Hypernyms

 * - order, - suborder

title: Ailuropoda


text:
Ailuropoda melanoleuca

Hypernyms

 * - order; - suborder;  - family;  - subfamily;  - genus

title: Ailuropoda melanoleuca


text:
Talk:sal

Re. Latin: 'sal' is used by Virgil in Book 6 of the Aeneid to mean 'sea' ('stant sale Tyrrheno classes') 85.211.122.32 13:55, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:sal


text: inundacións

title: inundacións


text: migrações

title: migrações


text: multidões

title: multidões


text: nascimentos

title: nascimentos


text: navalhas

title: navalhas


text:
ξεβουλωτήρι

Noun

 * 1) plunger
 * 2) unblocker
 * 3) something to uncork bottles

title: ξεβουλωτήρι


text: neurónios

title: neurónios


text: números atômicos

title: números atômicos


text: objeções

title: objeções


text: objecção

title: objecção


text: objecções

title: objecções


text: obrigações

title: obrigações


text: observatórios

title: observatórios


text: obsessões

title: obsessões


text: obtenções

title: obtenções


text:
Abila

Etymology
From.

title: Abila


text:
spårväg

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) tramway; an urban railtrack system that carries trams, in streets or on separate trackbed zones.

title: spårväg


text: mürekkebi

title: mürekkebi


text: mürekkepler

title: mürekkepler


text: mürekkebin

title: mürekkebin


text:
postexcretion

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) Following excretion

title: postexcretion


text: mürekkebim

title: mürekkebim


text:
postgavage

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) Following gavage

title: postgavage


text:
predementia

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  Early symptoms (such as memory-loss) that sometimes lead to full-blown dementia

title: predementia


text:
pregavage

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) Prior to gavage

title: pregavage


text:
prophylaxed

Adjective

 * 1) Subjected to prophylaxis.

title: prophylaxed


text:
User:Shivashree/adwords

आई -वडील -बहीण - भाऊ - काका - काकू - मामा - मामी - मावशी - आजोबा - आजी - दीर - जेठ - वहिणी - सासरा - सासू - पुतण्या - पुतणी - भाचा - भाची - साळा - साळी - साली - मेहुणा - मेहुणी - भावजयी - नणंद - मामेभाऊ - मामेबहीण - आतेभाऊ - आतेबहीण - चुलतभाऊ - चुलतबहीण - पती - पत्नी - नवरा - बायको -

(edit)

title: User:Shivashree/adwords


text:
retrosplenial

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1)  Behind the splenium.

title: retrosplenial


text:
rhotekin

Noun

 * 1)  A scaffold protein that interacts with Rho proteins

title: rhotekin


text: rumens

title: rumens


text:
subtest

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) A test that is part of a larger one

title: subtest


text:
neobalaenid

Noun

 * 1)  Any whale in the family ; a pygmy right whale.

title: neobalaenid


text: neobalaenids

title: neobalaenids


text:
neoceratiid

Noun

 * 1)  Any fish in the family.

title: neoceratiid


text: neoceratiids

title: neoceratiids


text:
neoechinorhynchid

Noun

 * 1)  Any acanthocephalan in the family.

title: neoechinorhynchid


text: neoechinorhynchids

title: neoechinorhynchids


text:
neoepiblemid

Noun

 * 1)  Any extinct rodent in the family.

title: neoepiblemid


text: subtests

title: subtests


text: neoepiblemids

title: neoepiblemids


text:
neoglyphioceratid

Noun

 * 1)  Any member of the Neoglyphioceratidae.

title: neoglyphioceratid


text: neoglyphioceratids

title: neoglyphioceratids


text:
neolanid

Noun

 * 1)  Any member of the family  of spiders.

title: neolanid


text: neolanids

title: neolanids


text:
neolepetopsid

Noun

 * 1)  Any limpet in the family.

title: neolepetopsid


text: neolepetopsids

title: neolepetopsids


text:
neomphalid

Noun

 * 1)  Any gastropod in the family.

title: neomphalid


text: neomphalids

title: neomphalids


text:
neoplagiaulacid

Noun

 * 1)  Any ptilodontoid mammal in the family.

title: neoplagiaulacid


text: neoplagiaulacids

title: neoplagiaulacids


text:
neopseustid

Noun

 * 1)  Any moth in the family.

title: neopseustid


text: neopseustids

title: neopseustids


text:
neoscopelid

Noun

 * 1)  Any fish in the family, such as the blackchin.

title: neoscopelid


text: neoscopelids

title: neoscopelids


text:
neoteuthid

Noun

 * 1)  Any squid in the family.

title: neoteuthid


text: neoteuthids

title: neoteuthids


text:
neottiophilid

Noun

 * 1)  Any fly in the family Neottiophilidae, a synonym of the.

title: neottiophilid


text: neottiophilids

title: neottiophilids


text:
neovenatorid

Noun

 * 1)  Any dinosaur in the family.

title: neovenatorid


text: neovenatorids

title: neovenatorids


text:
nephilid

Noun

 * 1)  Any spider in the former family Nephilidae, now considered part of the family.

title: nephilid


text: nephilids

title: nephilids


text:
nephropid

Etymology
From

Noun

 * 1)  Any member of the.

title: nephropid


text: nephropids

title: nephropids


text:
transentorhinal

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) Across the entorhinal cortex

title: transentorhinal


text:
आई

Noun

 * 1) period of life
 * 2) appointed hour, death

Etymology
Ultimately a nursery word. Cognate with 🇨🇬.
 * From
 * From
 * Ultimately from.

Noun

 * 1) mother

Derived terms

 * from + आई

title: आई


text:
वडील

Etymology
Ultimately from.

Noun

 * 1) father

Adjective

 * 1) elder

title: वडील


text:
nephropsid

Noun

 * 1)  Any lobster in the family.

title: nephropsid


text: nephropsids

title: nephropsids


text:
nephtheid

Noun

 * 1)  Any soft coral in the family

title: nephtheid


text: nephtheids

title: nephtheids


text:
nephtyid

Noun

 * 1)  Any polychaete worm of the family.

title: nephtyid


text: nephtyids

title: nephtyids


text:
nepid

Noun

 * 1)  Any member of the family, the water scorpions.

title: nepid


text: nepids

title: nepids


text:
nepticulid

Noun

 * 1)  Any moth in the family.

title: nepticulid


text: nepticulids

title: nepticulids


text:
nereidid

Noun

 * 1)  Any polychaete worm of the.

title: nereidid


text: nereidids

title: nereidids


text:
neriid

Noun

 * 1)  Any fly of the family.

title: neriid


text: neriids

title: neriids


text:
nerillid

Noun

 * 1)  Any polychaete worm of the family.

title: nerillid


text: nerillids

title: nerillids


text:
nerineid

Noun

 * 1)  Any extinct sea snail in the family.

title: nerineid


text: nerineids

title: nerineids


text:
nerinellid

Noun

 * 1)  Any extinct sea snail in the family.

title: nerinellid


text: nerinellids

title: nerinellids


text:
neritid

Noun

 * 1)  Any  in sea snail in the family ; a nerite.

title: neritid


text: neritids

title: neritids


text:
neritiliid

Noun

 * 1)  Any snail in the family.

title: neritiliid


text: neritiliids

title: neritiliids


text:
neritopsid

Noun

 * 1)  Any gastropod in the family.

title: neritopsid


text: neritopsids

title: neritopsids


text:
nesomyid

Noun

 * 1)  Any rodent in the family.

title: nesomyid


text: nesomyids

title: nesomyids


text:
nesophontid

Noun

 * 1)  Any mammal in the family.

title: nesophontid


text:
बहीण

Etymology
, from ,from. Cognate to 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) sister a female sibling of any age
 * 2) female cousin

title: बहीण


text: nesophontids

title: nesophontids


text:
nesticid

Noun

 * 1)  Any spider of the family.

title: nesticid


text: nesticids

title: nesticids


text:
nestorid

Noun

 * 1)  Any member of family  of parrot-like birds of New Zealand.

title: nestorid


text: nestorids

title: nestorids


text:
nettastomatid

Noun

 * 1)  Any eel in the family.

title: nettastomatid


text: nettastomatids

title: nettastomatids


text: neurorthid

title: neurorthid


text: neurorthids

title: neurorthids


text: Category:mr:Family

title: Category:mr:Family


text:
nevrorthid

Noun

 * 1)  Any lacewing in the family.

title: nevrorthid


text: nevrorthids

title: nevrorthids


text:
nicodamid

Noun

 * 1)  Any spider in the family.

title: nicodamid


text: nicodamids

title: nicodamids


text:
nicoletiid

Noun

 * 1)  Any of the primitive wingless insects in the family.

title: nicoletiid


text: nicoletiids

title: nicoletiids


text:
nicomiid

Noun

 * 1)  Any treehopper in the family Nicomiidae, a synonym of the.

title: nicomiid


text: nicomiids

title: nicomiids


text:
nicothoid

Noun

 * 1)  Any copepod in the family.

title: nicothoid


text: nicothoids

title: nicothoids


text: nimravids

title: nimravids


text:
niphargid

Noun

 * 1)  Any amphipod in the family.

title: niphargid


text: niphargids

title: niphargids


text:
nitidulid

Noun

 * 1)  Any beetle in the family.

title: nitidulid


text: nitidulids

title: nitidulids


text:
noasaurid

Noun

 * 1)  Any dinosaur in the family.

title: noasaurid


text: noasaurids

title: noasaurids


text:
nocticolid

Noun

 * 1)  Any cockroach in the family.

title: nocticolid


text: nocticolids

title: nocticolids


text:
noetiid

Noun

 * 1)  Any member of the family  of clams.

title: noetiid


text: noetiids

title: noetiids


text:
nogodinid

Noun

 * 1)  Any fulgoroid planthopper in the family.

title: nogodinid


text: nogodinids

title: nogodinids


text:
nolid

Noun

 * 1)  Any member of the family  of moths.

title: nolid


text: nolids

title: nolids


text:
nomeid

Noun

 * 1)  Any fish in the family, the driftfishes.

title: nomeid


text: nomeids

title: nomeids


text:
nonionid

Noun

 * 1)  Any member of the Nonionidae.

title: nonionid


text: nonionids

title: nonionids


text:
quercypsittid

Noun

 * 1)  Any extinct parrot in the family.

title: quercypsittid


text:
引き取る

Verb

 * 1) take back, collect, claim
 * 2) to take into one's care (e.g. person, pet); to take custody of; to adopt
 * 3) to leave
 * 4) to die
 * 1) to leave
 * 2) to die
 * 1) to die

title: 引き取る


text:
nosematid

Noun

 * 1)  Any member of the family  of organisms classified variously as in the taxonomic kingdoms  or Protozoa.

title: nosematid


text: nosematids

title: nosematids


text:
nosodendrid

Noun

 * 1)  Any beetle in the family.

title: nosodendrid


text: nosodendrids

title: nosodendrids


text:
nostoceratid

Noun

 * 1)  Any ammonite in the family.

title: nostoceratid


text: nostoceratids

title: nostoceratids


text:
notacanthid

Noun

 * 1)  Any fish in the family, the.

title: notacanthid


text: notacanthids

title: notacanthids


text:
noterid

Noun

 * 1)  Any member of family  of.

title: noterid


text: noterids

title: noterids


text:
Citations:shazbot

 * 2012 April 12,  (video game), player character (via command VGS ):
 * Shazbot!
 * 2012 April 12,  (video game), player character (via command VGS ):
 * Shazbot!
 * 2012 April 12,  (video game), player character (via command VGS ):
 * Shazbot!
 * 2012 April 12,  (video game), player character (via command VGS ):
 * Shazbot!
 * 2012 April 12,  (video game), player character (via command VGS ):
 * Shazbot!

title: Citations:shazbot


text:
unequality

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  inequality

title: unequality


text:
クローク

Noun

 * 1) cloakroom

title: クローク


text: uropathologists

title: uropathologists


text:
クロークルーム

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) cloakroom

title: クロークルーム


text:
vascularly

Adverb

 * 1) Via the blood vessels.

title: vascularly


text:
notharctid

Noun

 * 1)  Any extinct prosimian in the family †.

title: notharctid


text: notharctids

title: notharctids


text:
nothobranchiid

Noun

 * 1) Any member of the  of fish.

title: nothobranchiid


text: nothobranchiids

title: nothobranchiids


text:
nothosaurid

Noun

 * 1)  Any extinct reptile of the family.

title: nothosaurid


text: nothosaurids

title: nothosaurids


text:
notocheirid

Noun

 * 1)  Any member of the family, the.

title: notocheirid


text: notocheirids

title: notocheirids


text:
notodontid

Noun

 * 1)  Any member of the, whose caterpillars have a horn-like hump on the back.

title: notodontid


text: notodontids

title: notodontids


text:
notohippid

Noun

 * 1)  Any toxodont in the family.

title: notohippid


text: notohippids

title: notohippids


text:
notonectid

Noun

 * 1)  Any member of the family, the backswimmers.

title: notonectid


text:
entérologie

Noun

 * 1) enterology

title: entérologie


text: notonectids

title: notonectids


text:
notopterid

Noun

 * 1)  Any fish in the family, the featherbacks.

title: notopterid


text: notopterids

title: notopterids


text:
notoryctid

Noun

 * 1)  Any marsupial in the family ; a marsupial mole.

title: notoryctid


text:
申し出る

Verb

 * 1) offer, propose
 * 2) apply, ask
 * 3) notify

title: 申し出る


text: notoryctids

title: notoryctids


text:
notostylopid

Noun

 * 1)  Any notoungulate in the family.

title: notostylopid


text: notostylopids

title: notostylopids


text:
notosuchid

Noun

 * 1)  Any extinct crocodylomorph in the family.

title: notosuchid


text: notosuchids

title: notosuchids


text:
notosudid

Noun

 * 1)  Any fish in the family, the waryfishes.

title: notosudid


text: notosudids

title: notosudids


text:
nototheniid

Noun

 * 1)  Any fish in the family  of.

title: nototheniid


text: nototheniids

title: nototheniids


text: nucleariids

title: nucleariids


text:
nuculanid

Noun

 * 1)  Any clam in the family.

title: nuculanid


text: nuculanids

title: nuculanids


text:
nuculid

Noun

 * 1)  Any member of the family  of nut clams.

title: nuculid


text: nuculids

title: nuculids


text:
numidid

Noun

 * 1)  Any member of the ; a guineafowl.

title: numidid


text: numidids

title: numidids


text:
gastro-entérologie

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) gastroenterology

title: gastro-entérologie


text: gastroentérologie

title: gastroentérologie


text:
sigillé

Etymology
, borrowed from, from the past participle of  (cf. French ).

Adjective

 * 1) sealed (marked with a seal)

title: sigillé


text:
nycteribiid

Noun

 * 1)  Any fly of the family.

title: nycteribiid


text: nycteribiids

title: nycteribiids


text:
nycterid

Noun

 * 1)  Any member of the family  of bats;.

title: nycterid


text: nycterids

title: nycterids


text:
nyctibiid

Noun

 * 1)  Any potoo in the family.

title: nyctibiid


text: nyctibiids

title: nyctibiids


text:
nyctiphruretid

Noun

 * 1)  Any parareptile in the family.

title: nyctiphruretid


text: nyctiphruretids

title: nyctiphruretids


text:
nyctosaurid

Noun

 * 1)  Any pterosaur in the family.

title: nyctosaurid


text: nyctosaurids

title: nyctosaurids


text: nymphalids

title: nymphalids


text: nymphids

title: nymphids


text:
nymphomyiid

Noun

 * 1)  Any fly in the family.

title: nymphomyiid


text: nymphomyiids

title: nymphomyiids


text:
nymphonid

Noun

 * 1)  Any sea spider in the family.

title: nymphonid


text: nymphonids

title: nymphonids


text:
obolid

Noun

 * 1)  Any member of the family  of lamp shells.

title: obolid


text: obolids

title: obolids


text:
oceanitid

Noun

 * 1)  Any member of the family  of  or.

Usage notes

 * Sometimes defined as subfamily of family.

title: oceanitid


text: oceanitids

title: oceanitids


text:
ochlesid

Noun

 * 1)  Any member of the family  of small shrimp-like crustaceans.

title: ochlesid


text: ochlesids

title: ochlesids


text:
ochodaeid

Noun

 * 1)  Any beetle in the family.

title: ochodaeid


text: ochodaeids

title: ochodaeids


text:
ochotonid

Noun

 * 1)  Any member of the family, the pikas.

Translations

 * Italian:

title: ochotonid


text: ochotonids

title: ochotonids


text:
ochterid

Noun

 * 1)  Any insect in the family.

title: ochterid


text: ochterids

title: ochterids


text:
ochyroceratid

Noun

 * 1)  Any spider in the family.

title: ochyroceratid


text: ochyroceratids

title: ochyroceratids


text:
ocoid

Noun

 * 1)  Any member of the Ocoidae.

title: ocoid


text: ocoids

title: ocoids


text:
octodontid

Etymology
< +, according to the wear pattern of the teeth of these rodents, which resembles a figure 8.

Noun

 * 1)  Any of the, a family of rodents including the   and 12 other South American species

Related terms

 * octodontine

Translations

 * Finnish: torvimyyrä, degu
 * German:
 * Italian: ,
 * Norwegian:
 * Bokmål: buskrotte, trompetrotte
 * Nynorsk: buskrotte, trompetrotte
 * Swedish: buskråtta

title: octodontid


text: octodontids

title: octodontids


text:
octopodid

Noun

 * 1)  Any octopus in the family.

title: octopodid


text: octopodids

title: octopodids


text:
octopoteuthid

Noun

 * 1)  Any squid in the family.

title: octopoteuthid


text: octopoteuthids

title: octopoteuthids


text:
oculinid

Noun

 * 1)  Any of the family  of stony corals.

title: oculinid


text: oculinids

title: oculinids


text:
ocypodid

Noun

 * 1)  Any crab in the family.

title: ocypodid


text: ocypodids

title: ocypodids


text:
ocythoid

Noun

 * 1)  Any member of the Ocythoidae.

title: ocythoid


text: ocythoids

title: ocythoids


text:
odiid

Noun

 * 1)  Any member of the family  (now ) of small shrimp-like crustaceans.

title: odiid


text: odiids

title: odiids


text:
odiniid

Noun

 * 1)  Any fly of the family.

title: odiniid


text: odiniids

title: odiniids


text: Territorians

title: Territorians


text:
odontaspidid

Noun

 * 1)  Any shark in the family.

title: odontaspidid


text: odontaspidids

title: odontaspidids


text:
odontasterid

Noun

 * 1)  Any starfish in the family

title: odontasterid


text: odontasterids

title: odontasterids


text:
odontobutid

Noun

 * 1)  Any fish in the family.

title: odontobutid


text: odontobutids

title: odontobutids


text:
odontodactylid

Noun

 * 1)  Any mantis shrimp in the family  ( spp.).

title: odontodactylid