text: indoeuropaeum

title: indoeuropaeum


text: indoeuropaei

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: indoeuropaei


text: indoeuropaeae

title: indoeuropaeae


text: indoeuropaeorum

title: indoeuropaeorum


text: indoeuropaearum

title: indoeuropaearum


text: indoeuropaeo

title: indoeuropaeo


text: indoeuropaeis

title: indoeuropaeis


text: indoeuropaeam

title: indoeuropaeam


text: indoeuropaeos

title: indoeuropaeos


text: indoeuropaeas

title: indoeuropaeas


text: indoeuropaee

title: indoeuropaee


text: indoiranicum

title: indoiranicum


text: indoiranicae

title: indoiranicae


text: indoiranicorum

title: indoiranicorum


text: indoiranicarum

title: indoiranicarum


text: indoiranicis

title: indoiranicis


text: indoiranicam

title: indoiranicam


text: indoiranicos

title: indoiranicos


text: indoiranicas

title: indoiranicas


text: indoiranice

title: indoiranice


text: indonesica

title: indonesica


text: indonesicum

title: indonesicum


text: indonesici

title: indonesici


text: indonesicae

title: indonesicae


text: indonesicorum

title: indonesicorum


text: indonesicarum

title: indonesicarum


text: indonesico

title: indonesico


text: indonesicis

title: indonesicis


text: indonesicam

title: indonesicam


text: indonesicos

title: indonesicos


text: indonesicas

title: indonesicas


text: indonesice

title: indonesice


text: indopacifica

title: indopacifica


text: indopacificum

title: indopacificum


text: indopacifici

title: indopacifici


text: indopacificae

title: indopacificae


text: indopacificorum

title: indopacificorum


text: indopacificarum

title: indopacificarum


text: indopacifico

title: indopacifico


text: indopacificis

title: indopacificis


text: indopacificam

title: indopacificam


text: indopacificos

title: indopacificos


text: indopacificas

title: indopacificas


text: indopacifice

title: indopacifice


text: indum

title: indum


text: indae

title: indae


text: indorum

title: indorum


text: indarum

title: indarum


text: indos

title: indos


text: infinitesimales

title: infinitesimales


text: infinitesimalia

title: infinitesimalia


text: infinitesimalium

title: infinitesimalium


text: infinitesimalibus

title: infinitesimalibus


text: infinitesimalem

title: infinitesimalem


text: infortunatum

title: infortunatum


text: infortunatae

title: infortunatae


text: infortunatorum

title: infortunatorum


text: infortunatarum

title: infortunatarum


text: infortunatis

title: infortunatis


text: infortunatam

title: infortunatam


text: infortunatos

title: infortunatos


text: infortunatas

title: infortunatas


text:
thundershock

Noun

 * 1) A sudden burst of thunder, a thunderclap; any similarly loud and sudden noise; a sudden, severe shock.

title: thundershock


text: thundershocks

title: thundershocks


text:
deall

Etymology
From. .

Verb

 * 1) to understand, to comprehend

Noun

 * 1) understanding, comprehension, intelligence

title: deall


text: ddeall

title: ddeall


text: neall

title: neall


text:
credu

Etymology
From, from , from , compound phrase of oblique case form of and.

Verb

 * 1) to believe, have faith in, trust, give credit, etc.
 * 2) to be disposed, feel inclined, bring oneself to, persuade oneself

Conjugation

 * Alternative third-person singular present subjunctive:

title: credu


text: gredu

title: gredu


text: nghredu

title: nghredu


text: chredu

title: chredu


text: ddawnsio

title: ddawnsio


text: nawnsio

title: nawnsio


text:
Thread:User talk:CodeCat/Replacing form of with specific inflection templates templates/reply

Why?


text:
Thread:User talk:CodeCat/Replacing form of with specific inflection templates templates/reply (2)

What are the reasons that come to your mind that the replacement your bot did was a bad idea?


text:
Thread:User talk:CodeCat/Replacing form of with specific inflection templates templates/reply (3)

None whatsoever.


text:
Thread:User talk:CodeCat/Replacing form of with specific inflection templates templates/reply (4)

Think harder. At least one disadvantage please.


text:
Thread:User talk:CodeCat/Replacing form of with specific inflection templates templates/reply (5)

Excuse me?


text:
Thread:User talk:CodeCat/Replacing form of with specific inflection templates templates/reply (6)

Ok, comprehension difficulties. Then let's try another one: what are the benefits of the replacement that you have done?


text:
Thread:User talk:CodeCat/Replacing form of with specific inflection templates templates/reply (7)

If you can't be civil then go away.


text:
Thread:User talk:CodeCat/Replacing form of with specific inflection templates templates/reply (8)

Given you have used your bot in one more unauthorized way in the violation of WT:BOT, I think you are under the obligation to at least explain the benefits or your actions. The other option is that you leave Wiktionary, which is probably long overdue.


text:
Thread:User talk:CodeCat/Replacing form of with specific inflection templates templates/reply (9)

You realise I could block you for intimidating behaviour/harassment right now? What you're saying now is pretty much personal attacks against me. Especially after I asked you to stop and leave me alone.


text:
Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2014-03/CFI: Removing usage in a well-known work 2

CFI: Removing usage in a well-known work 2

 * Voting on: Removing the item "use in a well-known work, or" from WT:CFI, specifically WT:ATTEST, placing ", or" at the end of the item "clearly widespread use".
 * Rationale: For the vote creator's rationale, see Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2014-03/CFI: Removing usage in a well-known work 2. The voters only vote on the proposed action, not on the rationale.

 * Vote starts: 00:01, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Vote ends: 23:59, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

 * Vote created: Dan Polansky (talk) 13:57, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Discussion:
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] Beer parlour archive/2011/January, January 2011
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] Beer parlour archive/2008/October, October 2008
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2011-04/CFI: Removing usage in a well-known work
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2014-03/CFI: Removing usage in a well-known work 2

Support

 * 1)  per Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2014-03/CFI: Removing usage in a well-known work 2. --Dan Polansky (talk) 11:47, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
 * 2) Support. As noted on the talk page, the last time we had a vote like this, the "well-known work" criterium was used to include many words from extinct and poorly attested languages, and I opposed its removal. Now, words from extinct and poorly attested have their own special allowances, and the only entries which rely on the "well-known work" criterium are one-off nonces whose very nature means we are usually unable to offer verifiable definitions for them. I agree with DCDuring's comment on the talk page that we should not have main-namespace entries for such things. We can create an appendix of nonces found in well-known works, and use  to direct anyone who actually looks up Joyce's thunder word (etc) to it, the way we already use  to direct people to appendices of phobias and of dictionary-only words. (And just like the use of  to direct users to those appendices is not regulated by CFI, I agree with the view expressed on the talk page that this use does not need to be spelt out in CFI. If anything, spelling out certain uses of  would be instruction creep and would imply that other uses were not allowed, when in fact  seems to be designed to be flexible.) - -sche (discuss) 19:26, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) . Approval of this proposal will result in the loss of recognition for nonce words found in well-known works. I could agree to having nonce words listed in Appendix: namespace and linking to them from mainspace via, but the current proposal makes no provision for that. (I would rather have abstained, since voting is the worst possible form of decision-making and we should really avoid it as much as possible, but around here abstaining from a vote means having your opinion ignored.) —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 19:43, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Approval of this proposal will result in nonce words being listed in an appendix linked-to by ; read my comment above. - -sche (discuss) 19:50, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
 * This vote is solely on "Removing the item 'use in a well-known work, or' from WT:CFI, specifically WT:ATTEST, placing ', or' at the end of the item 'clearly widespread use'." Your comments above reflect what you would like to happen if this proposal is approved, but that's not what the proposal itself says. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 20:21, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Alright, I've drafted a new vote that spells it out for you, even though I think that constitutes an undesirable level of instruction creep and borders on bureaucratic masturbation (to use Dick Laurent's colourful phrase). Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2014-03/CFI: Removing usage in a well-known work 3. - -sche (discuss) 20:36, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I think this vote itself already constitutes an undesirable level of instruction creep and bureaucratic masturbation. I hate votes and wish we wouldn't use them in our decision-making. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 20:40, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
 * In the past, Dan and sometimes others have opposed deciding things (most recently e.g. the repurposing of ) by discussion alone, and requested votes. Even I, who prefer to decide most things via discussion, think changes to our enumerated CFI are so major that they should be done by vote, like this. So we're at something of an impasse: it's hard (if not impossible) to make decisions when different sets of users can't even agree on which methods/venues of decision-making are acceptable. - -sche (discuss) 21:09, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Re: "since voting is the worst possible form of decision-making". Prove it. Or even better, acknowledge it to be a blatant nonsense; "not the best possible form of decision making"--maybe, "the worst possible form of decision-making"--ridiculous nonsense, even a criminal one. --Dan Polansky (talk) 09:26, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
 * This vote and virtually every other vote we've had at Wiktionary proves it. What's blatant nonsense is calling for a "vote" on every little thing we want to do, as is calling ideas you disagree with "criminal". Pretty sure disagreeing with Dan Polansky isn't against the law in my country. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 10:24, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Mentioning votes, even bad votes, does not constitute a proof that "voting is the worst possible form of decision-making". Your idea of what a proof is seems seriously lacking. --Dan Polansky (talk) 10:38, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Oppose. In the discussion of this subject, User:DCDuring commented: "There are lots of terms whose meaning I'd like to know, but which actually have no meaning in a linguistic sense". If such words are not found in Wiktionary, the reader may just as likely conclude that we are missing the word, rather than excluding the word. If we have an entry that explains the absence of meaning, then we are at least answering that question. Please note that I'm not wholly averse to a redirect from that entry to an appendix, but the proposal does not, by its terms, require the implementation of such an appendix, and I just don't know that it makes any more sense to do it that way. bd2412 T 21:38, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
 * 2) . I support appendicising nonce words, but, as Ruakh said in the previous vote, this solution throws out the baby with the bathwater. — Ungoliant (falai) 02:17, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2014-03/CFI: Removing usage in a well-known work 3 explicitly appendicises nonce words. - -sche (discuss) 02:41, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * My problem with this vote is not the lack of specification of what happens to nonce words if it passes, it’s the actual removal of the “usage in a well-known work” clause. — Ungoliant (falai) 02:46, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Then what do you mean by "I support appendicising nonce words"? Do you want nonce words to be present in the main namespace and in an appendix? (That would be a perfectly reasonable position ... it's just not one that I had considered that anyone might have, until now.) If you want nonce words to be present only in an appendix (not in the main namespace), then it would seem you should support this proposal: extinct and poorly documented languages are now have their own CFI — what words would be excluded if the "well-known work" provision were removed, other than nonce words? - -sche (discuss) 03:03, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * No, I don’t support keeping the nonce words in the MNS if they are moved. There are two other babies I see in the bathwater:
 * regional terms: the author of a well-known work may be only person to use a term limited to his dialect;
 * ease of citing: even if a term has a lot of uses, citing from a well-known work takes one-third of the time.
 * — Ungoliant (falai) 03:15, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * If we want to appendicise nonces, we have to know which words are nonces and which aren't, right? And the way to know if something is a nonce or not is to find out if multiple uses of it exist. Well, if they do, the term is not a nonce — and if it were listed at RFV, it'd be passed under the "three uses" clause. (I'm counting words that have only been used twice as "nonces".) If multiple uses don't exist, then the term is a nonce, and either gets kept (if we keep the "well-known work" clause) or appendicised (if we get rid of the "well-known work" clause). Your thought about how it would be easier to cite a well-known work than to cite three works is an interesting thought, but can you point to any RFV discussion in which it actually happened that participants agreed that a word was used in 3+ works but that they could only be bothered to cite one of them — can you point to any word that was passed under the "well-known work" clause even though it could have passed under the "three uses" clause? Keeping the "well-known work" clause for such an uncommon and easily overcomeable situation as that seems less like keeping the bathwater because the baby hasn't quite finished its bath, and more like abandoning the baby in the bathtub because drying babies off is slightly difficult.
 * The presumption that any term that occurs only once in a language's total corpus is limited to the context in which it occurs seems like a solid presumption for a descriptivist dictionary to make. How would you refute that presumption? In other words, how would you demonstrate that any nonce was not region/dialect-specific? You couldn't point to speakers of other dialects using the terms, because if you could, the term wouldn't be a nonce. - -sche (discuss) 04:46, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Talk:phenomenon, Talk:fall, Talk:throw. Not a resource used very often but I don’t see why we should get rid of it. Research may clarify the term’s condition; you can find resources saying that bababa...thurnuk is Joyce’s coinage, for example. — Ungoliant (falai) 05:20, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Do you not want to get rid of nonce's? DCDuring TALK 17:41, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * No, I want them to be appendicised. — Ungoliant (falai) 17:45, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * @User:Ungoliant MMDCCLXIV: Since we now know that you consider bababadalgharaghtakamminarronnkonnbronntonnerronntuonnthunntrovarrhounawnskawntoohoohoordenenthurnuk to be the baby to be protected rather than the bathwater to be thrown away, what is the bathwater of the discussed CFI item? Put differently, what do you consider to be the negative consequences of the discussed CFI item, if any? --Dan Polansky (talk) 07:33, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
 * What? No. I’ll cut the metaphor and state with (hopefully) more clarity what I think should happen: nonce words should be moved to the Appendix namespace. These appendices should be linked to from the main namespace using . Getting rid of the well-known work clause would allow us to remove the nonce words from the main namespace, but it would also get rid of that clause’s useful aspects, so I oppose getting rid of it. — Ungoliant (falai) 10:51, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Are there any negative consequences of having the discussed item in CFI? --Dan Polansky (talk) 10:59, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, the presence of nonces in the main namespace. — Ungoliant (falai) 11:11, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Do you have an idea how to fix the negative consequence, other than removing the item while expressly stating that nonces are allowed in an appendix? --Dan Polansky (talk) 11:13, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Keeping the item and expressly stating that nonces aren’t allowed in the main namespace. — Ungoliant (falai) 11:19, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
 * What definition of nonce would you use and how would you distinguish single-attested nonces from single-attested non-nonces using evidence? --Dan Polansky (talk) 11:23, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The one at nonce word. See above. — Ungoliant (falai) 11:55, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
 * So you would use this definition of "nonce": "A word invented for the occasion." Now how do you distinguish single-attested nonces from single-attested non-nonces using evidence? --Dan Polansky (talk) 11:58, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
 * See above. — Ungoliant (falai) 12:55, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Where above? Like at Talk:phenomenon, Talk:fall, and Talk:throw? What sentences on these pages provide an answer to my question? --Dan Polansky (talk) 12:58, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
 * “Research may clarify the term’s condition; you can find resources saying that bababa...thurnuk is Joyce’s coinage, for example.” — Ungoliant (falai) 13:22, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

Decision

 * Fails 2–3 (40%). —msh210℠ (talk) 04:39, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I would have supported the the removal. but missed the vote. DCDuring TALK 07:08, 25 April 2014 (UTC)


text:
Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2014-03/CFI: Removing usage in a well-known work 2

Rationale
The well-known work item allows inclusion of terms that no one uses, such as Joyce's "bababadalgharagh...". In Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2011-04/CFI: Removing usage in a well-known work, there was the objection that we need the item to include terms of poorly attested languages; this has been meanwhile solved by adding a dedicated regulation for them to WT:CFI: CFI. --Dan Polansky (talk) 14:01, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I think there is room at Wiktionary for nonce words encountered in well-known works, including those by James Joyce and WWII-era Finnish songs with pseudo-Russian words in them. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 14:12, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Do you think "there is room" at Wiktionary for words used to refer to objects from a fictional universe, such as Mordor or Ungoliant?
 * What do you mean by "there is room"? Assuming that you are not referring to digital storage running out, is this some sort of idiom? --Dan Polansky (talk) 14:15, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Room is not the question. Wiktionary should only be housing terms that are part of the language, which at least requires reuse and shared meaning, on both of which scores terms fail that are only found in a single author's well-known works and commentaries thereon.
 * For one thing for many of the nonce terms we favor because of their literary source, the meaning is not at all obvious to a would-be definer of the term, eg palp, sense 2. Joyce probably liked the ambiguity. possibly because he thought it better represented mentalese or however we would recharacterize stream of consciousness in terms used in modern cognitive psychology.
 * For a term to be first attestably used in what turns out to be a well-known work and yet fail to be reused is a clear indication that it is not part of the language, much more than would be the case where the same result follows for a term that did not benefit from such a happy accident of birth. The first case seems to indicate rejection; the second might merely indicate neglect. I would favor having such terms in concordance and appendix space where textual and cultural context, allusion, etymology of such terms can get all the chapter-length speculative treatment they deserve and more. DCDuring TALK 14:44, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
 * WT:CFI doesn't say "Wiktionary should only be housing terms that are part of the language", it says "A term should be included if it's likely that someone would run across it and want to know what it means." A person is likely to run across nonce words in well-known works and want to know what they mean. Now, if I was reading Finnegans Wake and came to the part with the thunderclap, I wouldn't actually turn to a dictionary to find out what it meant, because I'd be able to tell instantly that it was a word he'd just made up on the spot. But if I was reading Ulysses and came across palp:, I might very well wonder what it meant and turn to Wiktionary to find out, and would consider it an omission on Wiktionary's part if the term wasn't there. As for Mordor, judging from uses like this and this it does seem to have entered the language as a common noun. In cases like Ungoliant, though, which doesn't seem to have entered the language that way (but see this), I'd probably be less inclusive of fictional proper nouns, because it would normally be obvious to the reader that these words have no meaning beyond the person or place they refer to within the text. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 20:25, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
 * There are lots of terms whose meaning I'd like to know, but which actually have no meaning in a linguistic sense. We do not and cannot offer a supportable definition. If we form a definition based only the single usage, then we have no opportunity to validate the meaning in other uses. If we cannot offer a definition that meets our normal standards, I think it is misleading to present any definition. Concordances and appendices are the only homes for this in Wiktionary that do not do a disservice to our users. Redirects to such places are the most that we can offer our readers while maintaining some level of consistency of quality in our entries. If you think that someone should do what Joycean commentators do, there might be a case for an article at WikiJoyce or, more generally, WikiLitCrit. DCDuring TALK 21:42, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

What's new?
We've had exactly this vote before, and it failed by a wide margin. What has changed since then that having the same vote again makes sense? —msh210℠ (talk) 16:59, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
 * In that vote (on the talk page), people argued that we need the well-known work provision to save poorly attested languages. That is no longer valid, since poorly attested languages have their dedicated regulation now. So people opposing the vote now will need to have a different reason. They will need to explain why including a would-be word invented for a single well-known work and never used again is a good thing. Alternatively, the voters can vote "oppose" with no reasoning whatsoever, as they did at Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2011-04/CFI: Removing usage in a well-known work. --Dan Polansky (talk) 17:30, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
 * In the three years since that vote, some new users have joined the project, and some of the users who participated in the previous vote may have changed their minds. I voted "lean oppose" in that vote, but plan to vote "support" now. Dan himself ended up voting "oppose" last time but created this vote. Had the two of us voted "support" rather than "oppose" in the previous vote, the numbers would have been 5S, 4O, a weak majority for "support", rather than the 2-to-1 majority for "oppose". - -sche (discuss) 18:40, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Using Template:only in to direct users to an appendix of famous nonces
Expanding on DCDuring's comment that "concordances and appendices are the only homes for [nonce words] in Wiktionary that do not do a disservice to our users", I would just like to point out that in the same way we use Template:only in to direct people who look them up to our Appendix of English dictionary-only terms, we could use the template to direct users to an appendix of famous nonces. - -sche (discuss) 18:45, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Using to direct readers to an appendix of nonce forms used in well-known works would be acceptable to me. If we did that, I could support this vote. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 11:44, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I hope we can incorporate this into the vote without starting a new vote. Obviously we coulda/shoulda had most of this discussion before the vote. DCDuring TALK 14:15, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The vote was scheduled to start March 9, but the not-started notice has not been removed. DCDuring TALK 14:18, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I think we are having this discussion before the vote, in that the vote has not started yet. The vote creator did say "Let us postpone the vote as much as the discussion will make necessary." Accordingly, I've pushed the start date back to March 22nd. - -sche (discuss) 17:18, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
 * What do you think of this wording: Removing the item "use in a well-known work, or" from WT:CFI, placing ", or" at the end of the item "clearly widespread use". Thus, no longer having full entries for words which are only used in one or two well-known works. Instead, entries for such nonces can use Template:only in or an equivalent to redirect users to an appendix of nonces words found in well-known works. Cases where a string is a well-known nonce in one language and an attested word in another can be handled like this. Please critique and improve it as much as necessary. - -sche (discuss) 17:33, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
 * @User:-sche: Thank you for postponing the vote.
 * As for : from what I can see, the use of the template is not regulated by CFI in anyway. CFI does not mention the template and CFI does not make any allowance for e.g. dictionary-only terms to host template . Continuing in this tradition, I would not want to incorporate anything about into a modification of CFI proposed by the vote. --Dan Polansky (talk) 11:21, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Giving it a thought, I would like the simple vote as it is run its course, and if it fails, we can create one that explicitly allows the use of . The current practice is to place in a variety of entries for terms that do not meet CFI, without this being regulated by policy AFAIK. --Dan Polansky (talk) 11:45, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Ok. I agree with your interpretation that it isn't necessary to explicitly allow . - -sche (discuss) 19:07, 23 March 2014 (UTC)


text:
Template:User JS-0

de:Vorlage:User JS-0 tr:Şablon:Kullanıcı JS-0

title: Template:User JS-0


text: Template:User JS-1

title: Template:User JS-1


text: Template:User JS-2

title: Template:User JS-2


text: Template:User JS-3

title: Template:User JS-3


text: Template:User JS-4

title: Template:User JS-4


text: Category:User JavaScript coder

title: Category:User JavaScript coder


text: Category:User JavaScript coder-1

title: Category:User JavaScript coder-1


text: Category:User JavaScript coder-2

title: Category:User JavaScript coder-2


text: Category:Tetum terms derived from Old Galician-Portuguese


text: Category:User JavaScript coder-3

title: Category:User JavaScript coder-3


text: Category:Tetum terms derived from Romance languages


text: Category:User JavaScript coder-4

title: Category:User JavaScript coder-4


text:
Israelita

Etymology
From, from , from.

Noun

 * 1) Israelite; Jew; Hebrew

Etymology
, from, from.

Adjective

 * 1) Israelite

Noun

 * 1) Israelite

title: Israelita


text: zászlót

title: zászlót


text: zászlókat

title: zászlókat


text: zászlónak

title: zászlónak


text: zászlóknak

title: zászlóknak


text: zászlóval

title: zászlóval


text: zászlókkal

title: zászlókkal


text: zászlóért

title: zászlóért


text: zászlókért

title: zászlókért


text: zászlóvá

title: zászlóvá


text: zászlókká

title: zászlókká


text: zászlóig

title: zászlóig


text: zászlókig

title: zászlókig


text: zászlóként

title: zászlóként


text: zászlókként

title: zászlókként


text: zászlóban

title: zászlóban


text: zászlókban

title: zászlókban


text: zászlón

title: zászlón


text: zászlókon

title: zászlókon


text: zászlónál

title: zászlónál


text: zászlóknál

title: zászlóknál


text: zászlóba

title: zászlóba


text: zászlókba

title: zászlókba


text: zászlóra

title: zászlóra


text: zászlókra

title: zászlókra


text: zászlóhoz

title: zászlóhoz


text:
rakstāmgalds

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) desk table used for writing or reading, usually provided with drawers

title: rakstāmgalds


text: zászlókhoz

title: zászlókhoz


text: zászlóból

title: zászlóból


text: zászlókból

title: zászlókból


text: rakstāmgaldu

title: rakstāmgaldu


text: zászlóról

title: zászlóról


text: zászlókról

title: zászlókról


text: zászlótól

title: zászlótól


text: zászlóktól

title: zászlóktól


text: zászlóm

title: zászlóm


text: zászlómat

title: zászlómat


text: rakstāmgalda

title: rakstāmgalda


text: zászlómnak

title: zászlómnak


text: zászlómmal

title: zászlómmal


text: rakstāmgaldā

title: rakstāmgaldā


text: zászlómért

title: zászlómért


text: zászlómmá

title: zászlómmá


text: たとえる

title: たとえる


text: zászlómig

title: zászlómig


text: zászlómként

title: zászlómként


text: zászlómul

title: zászlómul


text: tatoeru

title: tatoeru


text: zászlómban

title: zászlómban


text: zászlómon

title: zászlómon


text: zászlómnál

title: zászlómnál


text: zászlómba

title: zászlómba


text: zászlómra

title: zászlómra


text: zászlómhoz

title: zászlómhoz


text: zászlómból

title: zászlómból


text: zászlómtól

title: zászlómtól


text: rakstāmgaldam

title: rakstāmgaldam


text: zászlómról

title: zászlómról


text: rakstāmgaldi

title: rakstāmgaldi


text: rakstāmgaldus

title: rakstāmgaldus


text: rakstāmgaldos

title: rakstāmgaldos


text: rakstāmgaldiem

title: rakstāmgaldiem


text:
rakstāmpapīrs

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) writing paper paper meant for writing

title: rakstāmpapīrs


text: cavilgo

title: cavilgo


text: Category:lv:Paper

title: Category:lv:Paper


text: cavilgues

title: cavilgues


text: cavilga

title: cavilga


text: cavilgamos

title: cavilgamos


text: cavilgáis

title: cavilgáis


text: cavilguen

title: cavilguen


text: cavilgaba

title: cavilgaba


text: cavilgabes

title: cavilgabes


text: cavilgábemos

title: cavilgábemos


text: cavilgábamos

title: cavilgábamos


text: cavilgabeis

title: cavilgabeis


text: cavilgabais

title: cavilgabais


text: cavilgaben

title: cavilgaben


text: cavilgué

title: cavilgué


text: cavilgasti

title: cavilgasti


text: cavilguesti

title: cavilguesti


text: cavilgó

title: cavilgó


text: cavilguemos

title: cavilguemos


text: cavilgastis

title: cavilgastis


text: cavilguestis

title: cavilguestis


text: cavilgaron

title: cavilgaron


text:
rakstāmais papīrs

Noun

 * 1) writing paper;

title: rakstāmais papīrs


text: cavilgara

title: cavilgara


text: cavilgare

title: cavilgare


text: cavilgares

title: cavilgares


text: cavilgaras

title: cavilgaras


text: cavilgáramos

title: cavilgáramos


text: cavilgáremos

title: cavilgáremos


text: rakstāmpapīru

title: rakstāmpapīru


text: cavilgareis

title: cavilgareis


text: cavilgarais

title: cavilgarais


text: cavilgaran

title: cavilgaran


text: cavilgaren

title: cavilgaren


text: rakstāmpapīra

title: rakstāmpapīra


text: cavilgue

title: cavilgue


text: cavilgas

title: cavilgas


text: rakstāmpapīrā

title: rakstāmpapīrā


text: cavilguéis

title: cavilguéis


text:
llaguna

Etymology
From.

title: llaguna


text: rakstāmpapīram

title: rakstāmpapīram


text: cavilgan

title: cavilgan


text: llagunes

title: llagunes


text:
llande

Etymology
From, accusative singular of.

Noun

 * 1)  fruit of the oak tree

title: llande


text: cavilgaré

title: cavilgaré


text: llandes

title: llandes


text: cavilgarás

title: cavilgarás


text: rakstāmpapīri

title: rakstāmpapīri


text:
llanu

Etymology
From. .

Adjective

 * 1)  having no variations in altitude

title: llanu


text:
llavandera

Etymology
From, from , or from French. Compare 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1)  various small passerine birds

title: llavandera


text: cavilgará

title: cavilgará


text: llavanderes

title: llavanderes


text:
llavandería

Noun

 * 1)  place with facilities for washing that public may use

title: llavandería


text: rakstāmpapīrus

title: rakstāmpapīrus


text: cavilgaremos

title: cavilgaremos


text: llavanderíes

title: llavanderíes


text:
llealtá

Noun

 * 1)  the state of being loyal; fidelity

title: llealtá


text: rakstāmpapīros

title: rakstāmpapīros


text: cavilgaréis

title: cavilgaréis


text: llealtaes

title: llealtaes


text: cavilgarán

title: cavilgarán


text:
llegalizar

Verb

 * 1)  to  make legal

title: llegalizar


text: rakstāmpapīriem

title: rakstāmpapīriem


text: cavilgaría

title: cavilgaría


text: cavilgaríes

title: cavilgaríes


text: cavilgaríemos

title: cavilgaríemos


text:
llibrería

Noun

 * 1)  shop that sells books

title: llibrería


text: cavilgaríamos

title: cavilgaríamos


text:
llibru de testu

Noun

 * 1)  formal manual of instruction

title: llibru de testu


text: llibreríes

title: llibreríes


text: cavilgaríais

title: cavilgaríais


text:
llimpiaparabrís

Noun

 * 1)  device to clear a windshield

title: llimpiaparabrís


text: cavilgaríeis

title: cavilgaríeis


text: llinaxe

title: llinaxe


text: llinaxes

title: llinaxes


text: cavilgaríen

title: cavilgaríen


text:
llince

Noun

 * 1)  wild cat

title: llince


text: cavilgái

title: cavilgái


text: llingua materna

title: llingua materna


text: llinces

title: llinces


text: cavilgando

title: cavilgando


text: llingüista

title: llingüista


text: rakstāmo papīru

title: rakstāmo papīru


text: cavilgáu

title: cavilgáu


text:
llingüística

Noun

 * 1)  scientific study of language

title: llingüística


text: llingüistes

title: llingüistes


text: cavilgada

title: cavilgada


text: lliones

title: lliones


text: cavilgao

title: cavilgao


text:
llocántaru

Noun

 * 1)  crustacean

title: llocántaru


text: cavilgaos

title: cavilgaos


text: cavilgaes

title: cavilgaes


text: rakstāmā papīra

title: rakstāmā papīra


text: andorgo

title: andorgo


text:
llucir

Etymology
From, from.

Verb

 * 1) to  to emit light

title: llucir


text: andorgues

title: andorgues


text:
llutu

Noun

 * 1)  expressing sorrow over death
 * 2)  clothes worn by mourners

title: llutu


text: llocántaros

title: llocántaros


text: llutos

title: llutos


text:
andorga

Etymology
. Perhaps from a language, from.

Noun

 * 1) belly, paunch
 * 2) guts
 * 1) guts

title: andorga


text:
llámome

Phrase

 * 1)  a way to identify oneself

title: llámome


text: andorgamos

title: andorgamos


text: rakstāmajā papīrā

title: rakstāmajā papīrā


text: andorgáis

title: andorgáis


text: maestres

title: maestres


text: andorguen

title: andorguen


text:
maestru

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) male teacher

Etymology
, from. Doublet of inherited and borrowing, as well as , from German, and , from Hungarian.

Noun

 * 1) master male
 * 2)  teacher male
 * 3)  maestro, conductor

title: maestru


text: rakstāmajam papīram

title: rakstāmajam papīram


text:
magnetómetru

Noun

 * 1)   instrument

title: magnetómetru


text: andorgaba

title: andorgaba


text: andorgabes

title: andorgabes


text:
magnetómetro

Noun

 * 1)  magnetometer instrument used to measure the intensity and direction of a magnetic field

Noun

 * 1)  magnetometer instrument

title: magnetómetro


text: andorgábemos

title: andorgábemos


text: andorgábamos

title: andorgábamos


text: magnetómetros

title: magnetómetros


text: andorgabeis

title: andorgabeis


text: rakstāmie papīri

title: rakstāmie papīri


text: andorgabais

title: andorgabais


text: mamú

title: mamú


text: mamús

title: mamús


text: rakstāmos papīrus

title: rakstāmos papīrus


text: andorgaben

title: andorgaben


text:
manómetru

Noun

 * 1)  instrument

title: manómetru


text:
maquillaxe

Noun

 * 1)  cosmetics

title: maquillaxe


text: andorgué

title: andorgué


text: rakstāmajos papīros

title: rakstāmajos papīros


text:
mar Bermeya

Proper noun

 * 1)  sea between Africa and Arabia

title: mar Bermeya


text: andorgasti

title: andorgasti


text: andorguesti

title: andorguesti


text: andorgó

title: andorgó


text: andorguemos

title: andorguemos


text: andorgastis

title: andorgastis


text: andorguestis

title: andorguestis


text: andorgaron

title: andorgaron


text: andorgara

title: andorgara


text: rakstāmajiem papīriem

title: rakstāmajiem papīriem


text: andorgare

title: andorgare


text:
marín

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1)  of or pertaining to the sea

title: marín


text: andorgares

title: andorgares


text: andorgaras

title: andorgaras


text: andorgáramos

title: andorgáramos


text: andorgáremos

title: andorgáremos


text: andorgareis

title: andorgareis


text: andorgarais

title: andorgarais


text: andorgaran

title: andorgaran


text: andorgaren

title: andorgaren


text: andorgue

title: andorgue


text: andorgas

title: andorgas


text: andorguéis

title: andorguéis


text: andorgan

title: andorgan


text: andorgaré

title: andorgaré


text: andorgarás

title: andorgarás


text: andorgará

title: andorgará


text: andorgaremos

title: andorgaremos


text: andorgaréis

title: andorgaréis


text: andorgarán

title: andorgarán


text: andorgaría

title: andorgaría


text: andorgaríes

title: andorgaríes


text: andorgaríemos

title: andorgaríemos


text: andorgaríamos

title: andorgaríamos


text: andorgaríais

title: andorgaríais


text: andorgaríeis

title: andorgaríeis


text: andorgaríen

title: andorgaríen


text: andorgái

title: andorgái


text: andorgando

title: andorgando


text: andorgáu

title: andorgáu


text: andorgada

title: andorgada


text: andorgao

title: andorgao


text: andorgaos

title: andorgaos


text: allugo

title: allugo


text: allugues

title: allugues


text: alluga

title: alluga


text: allugamos

title: allugamos


text: allugáis

title: allugáis


text: alluguen

title: alluguen


text: allugaba

title: allugaba


text: allugabes

title: allugabes


text: allugábemos

title: allugábemos


text: allugábamos

title: allugábamos


text: allugabeis

title: allugabeis


text: allugabais

title: allugabais


text: allugaben

title: allugaben


text: allugué

title: allugué


text: allugasti

title: allugasti


text: alluguesti

title: alluguesti


text: allugó

title: allugó


text: alluguemos

title: alluguemos


text: allugastis

title: allugastis


text: alluguestis

title: alluguestis


text: allugaron

title: allugaron


text: allugara

title: allugara


text: allugare

title: allugare


text: allugares

title: allugares


text: allugaras

title: allugaras


text: allugáramos

title: allugáramos


text: allugáremos

title: allugáremos


text: allugareis

title: allugareis


text: allugarais

title: allugarais


text: allugaran

title: allugaran


text: allugaren

title: allugaren


text: allugue

title: allugue


text: allugas

title: allugas


text: alluguéis

title: alluguéis


text: allugan

title: allugan


text: allugaré

title: allugaré


text: allugarás

title: allugarás


text: allugará

title: allugará


text: allugaremos

title: allugaremos


text: allugaréis

title: allugaréis


text: allugarán

title: allugarán


text: allugaría

title: allugaría


text: allugaríes

title: allugaríes


text: allugaríemos

title: allugaríemos


text: allugaríamos

title: allugaríamos


text: allugaríais

title: allugaríais


text: allugaríeis

title: allugaríeis


text: allugaríen

title: allugaríen


text: allugái

title: allugái


text: allugando

title: allugando


text: allugáu

title: allugáu


text: allugada

title: allugada


text: allugao

title: allugao


text: allugaos

title: allugaos


text: allugaes

title: allugaes


text: conxugo

title: conxugo


text: conxugues

title: conxugues


text: conxuga

title: conxuga


text: conxugamos

title: conxugamos


text: conxugáis

title: conxugáis


text: conxuguen

title: conxuguen


text: conxugaba

title: conxugaba


text: conxugabes

title: conxugabes


text: conxugábemos

title: conxugábemos


text: conxugábamos

title: conxugábamos


text: conxugabeis

title: conxugabeis


text: conxugabais

title: conxugabais


text: conxugaben

title: conxugaben


text: conxugué

title: conxugué


text: conxugasti

title: conxugasti


text: conxuguesti

title: conxuguesti


text: conxugó

title: conxugó


text: conxuguemos

title: conxuguemos


text: conxugastis

title: conxugastis


text: conxuguestis

title: conxuguestis


text: conxugaron

title: conxugaron


text: conxugara

title: conxugara


text: conxugare

title: conxugare


text: conxugares

title: conxugares


text: conxugaras

title: conxugaras


text: conxugáramos

title: conxugáramos


text: conxugáremos

title: conxugáremos


text: conxugareis

title: conxugareis


text: conxugarais

title: conxugarais


text: conxugaran

title: conxugaran


text: conxugaren

title: conxugaren


text: conxugue

title: conxugue


text: conxugas

title: conxugas


text: conxuguéis

title: conxuguéis


text: conxugan

title: conxugan


text: conxugaré

title: conxugaré


text: conxugarás

title: conxugarás


text: conxugará

title: conxugará


text: conxugaremos

title: conxugaremos


text: conxugaréis

title: conxugaréis


text:
Crimean War

Proper noun

 * 1)  A conflict held mostly in the Crimean Peninsula between October 1853 and February 1856, in which Russian troops were defeated to an alliance of France, the United Kingdom, the Ottoman Empire, and Sardinia.

Translations

 * Afrikaans: Krimoorlog
 * Belarusian: Кры́мская вайна́
 * Chinese:
 * Mandarin: 克里米亞戰爭
 * Crimean Tatar: Qırım cenki
 * Finnish: Krimin sota, Oolannin sota
 * French: guerre de Crimée
 * German:
 * Greek: Κριμαϊκός Πόλεμος
 * Japanese:
 * Korean:
 * Marathi: क्रायमियन युद्ध
 * Mongolian: Крымын дайн
 * Persian:
 * Polish: wojna krymska
 * Portuguese: Guerra da Crimeia
 * Russian: Кры́мская война́
 * Spanish: Guerra de Crimea
 * Tatar: Кырым сугышы
 * Turkish: Kırım Savaşı
 * Ukrainian: Кри́мська війна́
 * Uyghur: قىرىم ئۇرۇشى

title: Crimean War


text: conxugarán

title: conxugarán


text: conxugaría

title: conxugaría


text: conxugaríes

title: conxugaríes


text: conxugaríemos

title: conxugaríemos


text: conxugaríamos

title: conxugaríamos


text: conxugaríais

title: conxugaríais


text: conxugaríeis

title: conxugaríeis


text: conxugaríen

title: conxugaríen


text: conxugái

title: conxugái


text: conxugando

title: conxugando


text: conxugáu

title: conxugáu


text: conxugada

title: conxugada


text: conxugao

title: conxugao


text: conxugaos

title: conxugaos


text:
Category:Latvian irregular adjectives

List of Latvian adjectives with various irregularities.

title: Category:Latvian irregular adjectives


text: conxugaes

title: conxugaes


text: resfrego

title: resfrego


text: resfregues

title: resfregues


text: resfrega

title: resfrega


text: resfregamos

title: resfregamos


text: resfregáis

title: resfregáis


text: resfreguen

title: resfreguen


text: resfregaba

title: resfregaba


text: resfregabes

title: resfregabes


text: resfregábemos

title: resfregábemos


text: resfregábamos

title: resfregábamos


text: resfregabeis

title: resfregabeis


text: resfregabais

title: resfregabais


text: resfregaben

title: resfregaben


text: resfregué

title: resfregué


text: resfregasti

title: resfregasti


text: resfreguesti

title: resfreguesti


text: resfregó

title: resfregó


text: resfreguemos

title: resfreguemos


text: resfregastis

title: resfregastis


text: resfreguestis

title: resfreguestis


text: resfregaron

title: resfregaron


text: resfregara

title: resfregara


text: resfregare

title: resfregare


text: resfregares

title: resfregares


text: resfregaras

title: resfregaras


text: resfregáramos

title: resfregáramos


text: resfregáremos

title: resfregáremos


text: resfregareis

title: resfregareis


text: resfregarais

title: resfregarais


text: resfregaran

title: resfregaran


text: resfregaren

title: resfregaren


text: resfregue

title: resfregue


text: resfregas

title: resfregas


text: resfreguéis

title: resfreguéis


text: resfregan

title: resfregan


text: resfregaré

title: resfregaré


text: resfregarás

title: resfregarás


text: resfregará

title: resfregará


text: resfregaremos

title: resfregaremos


text: resfregaréis

title: resfregaréis


text: resfregarán

title: resfregarán


text: resfregaría

title: resfregaría


text: resfregaríes

title: resfregaríes


text: resfregaríemos

title: resfregaríemos


text: resfregaríamos

title: resfregaríamos


text: resfregaríais

title: resfregaríais


text: resfregaríeis

title: resfregaríeis


text: resfregaríen

title: resfregaríen


text: resfregái

title: resfregái


text: resfregando

title: resfregando


text: resfregáu

title: resfregáu


text: resfregada

title: resfregada


text: resfregao

title: resfregao


text: resfregaos

title: resfregaos


text: resfregaes

title: resfregaes


text: amenorgo

title: amenorgo


text: amenorgues

title: amenorgues


text: amenorga

title: amenorga


text: amenorgamos

title: amenorgamos


text: amenorgáis

title: amenorgáis


text: amenorguen

title: amenorguen


text: amenorgaba

title: amenorgaba


text: amenorgabes

title: amenorgabes


text: amenorgábemos

title: amenorgábemos


text: amenorgábamos

title: amenorgábamos


text: DVD-k

title: DVD-k


text: amenorgabeis

title: amenorgabeis


text: amenorgabais

title: amenorgabais


text: amenorgaben

title: amenorgaben


text: amenorgué

title: amenorgué


text: amenorgasti

title: amenorgasti


text: Budapesten

title: Budapesten


text: amenorguesti

title: amenorguesti


text: amenorgó

title: amenorgó


text: amenorguemos

title: amenorguemos


text: amenorgastis

title: amenorgastis


text: amenorguestis

title: amenorguestis


text: amenorgaron

title: amenorgaron


text: amenorgara

title: amenorgara


text: amenorgare

title: amenorgare


text: amenorgares

title: amenorgares


text: amenorgaras

title: amenorgaras


text: amenorgáramos

title: amenorgáramos


text: amenorgáremos

title: amenorgáremos


text: amenorgareis

title: amenorgareis


text:
Nagy

Etymology
From.

Translations

 * Chinese:
 * Mandarin:
 * Czech: Nagy,
 * French:
 * German: Nagy
 * Hungarian:
 * Polish: Nagy
 * Serbo-Croatian:
 * Slovak:

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Nagy is the 2,354th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 15,497 individuals. Nagy is most common among White (95.36%) individuals.

Etymology
.

Etymology
.

Proper noun

 * , equivalent to the French

Etymology
From, either directly or via. The meaning is equivalent to native Groß.

Etymology
From.

Etymology
.

title: Nagy


text: amenorgarais

title: amenorgarais


text: amenorgaran

title: amenorgaran


text: amenorgaren

title: amenorgaren


text: amenorgue

title: amenorgue


text: amenorgas

title: amenorgas


text: amenorguéis

title: amenorguéis


text: amenorgan

title: amenorgan


text: amenorgaré

title: amenorgaré


text: amenorgarás

title: amenorgarás


text: amenorgará

title: amenorgará


text: amenorgaremos

title: amenorgaremos


text: amenorgaréis

title: amenorgaréis


text: amenorgarán

title: amenorgarán


text: amenorgaría

title: amenorgaría


text: amenorgaríes

title: amenorgaríes


text: amenorgaríemos

title: amenorgaríemos


text: amenorgaríamos

title: amenorgaríamos


text: amenorgaríais

title: amenorgaríais


text: amenorgaríeis

title: amenorgaríeis


text: amenorgaríen

title: amenorgaríen


text: amenorgái

title: amenorgái


text: amenorgando

title: amenorgando


text: amenorgáu

title: amenorgáu


text:
Rhymes:Luxembourgish/eːs

One syllable

 * Bees
 * dees
 * Eess
 * Geess
 * hees
 * Keess
 * Mees
 * nees
 * Rees
 * Schweess
 * Thees
 * Weess

Two syllables

 * Gebeess

title: Rhymes:Luxembourgish/eːs


text: amenorgada

title: amenorgada


text: amenorgao

title: amenorgao


text: amenorgaos

title: amenorgaos


text: amenorgaes

title: amenorgaes


text: aforada

title: aforada


text: fartuco

title: fartuco


text:
Talk:lynching

lynching
RFV-sense "Any act of violence inflicted by a mob upon the body of another person." Added by an IP in 2006 in [//en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=lynching&diff=1724752&oldid=1359930 diff]. I think there is in fact another sense to "lynching" besides killing, but I'm not sure this is it — rather, I think an extrajudicial kidnapping might also be described as a lynching. (We may also be missing a metaphorical sense.) - -sche (discuss) 00:57, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
 * RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 05:54, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

lynch
RFV-sense: "To commit an act of violence by a mob upon the body of another person." Added in [//en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=lynch&diff=1724753&oldid=1636917]. See above. - -sche (discuss) 01:01, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
 * RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 05:54, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:lynching


text: fartuques

title: fartuques


text: aforados

title: aforados


text: fartuca

title: fartuca


text:
daudzi

Etymology
From the same stem as the adverb “much, many, a lot (of)” (q.v.).

Adjective
(def. ', no comp., no sup.; adv. ')

 * 1) many an indefinite large number of
 * 2)  many an indefinite large number
 * 1)  many an indefinite large number
 * 1)  many an indefinite large number
 * 1)  many an indefinite large number
 * 1)  many an indefinite large number

Usage notes
The adverbial form has a comparative form, but the adjectival form  has no corresponding comparative form (the term  does exist, but it is an indefinite pronoun by itself, meaning “several”).

title: daudzi


text: aforadas

title: aforadas


text: fartucamos

title: fartucamos


text: agustina

title: agustina


text: daudzas

title: daudzas


text: fartucáis

title: fartucáis


text: agustinos

title: agustinos


text:
daudzās

Adjective

title: daudzās


text: fartuquen

title: fartuquen


text:
Talk:Virgin's lavender

Virgin's lavender
I find no evidence for it at Books or Scholar. DCDuring TALK 21:22, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

 * RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 23:22, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

See also Talk:Mary's pigtail and Talk:Mother of God's plant. —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 16:29, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:Virgin's lavender


text: daudzus

title: daudzus


text: fartucaba

title: fartucaba


text:
daudzos

Adjective

title: daudzos


text:
Talk:Mary's pigtail

Mary's pigtail
Same contributor as above. No evidence. DCDuring TALK 21:28, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

 * RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 23:22, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

See also Talk:Virgin's lavender and Talk:Mother of God's plant. —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 16:30, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:Mary's pigtail


text: fartucabes

title: fartucabes


text: agrietada

title: agrietada


text: fartucábemos

title: fartucábemos


text: agrietados

title: agrietados


text: páguenmelos

title: páguenmelos


text:
Talk:Mother of God's plant

Mother of God's plant
Same as the two above. DCDuring TALK 21:38, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

 * RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 23:22, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

See also Talk:Virgin's lavender and Talk:Mary's pigtail. —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 16:31, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:Mother of God's plant


text: daudzu

title: daudzu


text: fartucábamos

title: fartucábamos


text: agrietadas

title: agrietadas


text: fartucabeis

title: fartucabeis


text: daudziem

title: daudziem


text: agustiniana

title: agustiniana


text: fartucabais

title: fartucabais


text: agustinianos

title: agustinianos


text: fartucaben

title: fartucaben


text: daudzām

title: daudzām


text:
ahumada

Noun

 * 1) the sending of smoke signals

title: ahumada


text: fartuqué

title: fartuqué


text: ahumados

title: ahumados


text: fartucasti

title: fartucasti


text: ahumadas

title: ahumadas


text: fartuquesti

title: fartuquesti


text: abotagada

title: abotagada


text: fartucó

title: fartucó


text: abotagados

title: abotagados


text:
Talk:homomarriage

homomarriage
No citations given, and the author has made numerous questionable entries. --Æ&Œ (talk) 18:39, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

 * Speedied as vandalism. Equinox ◑ 23:35, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

 * Cited. — Ungoliant (falai) 01:53, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

 * Okay, restored. But you couldn't blame me when AE was wasting everyone's time creating stuff and then bringing it here. Equinox ◑ 01:58, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

 * Equinox doesn’t love me. ;_; Oh, and lest we forget: . Remember what God said in Exodus, ‘Thou shalt not have fun.’ --Æ&Œ (talk) 03:01, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

 * Just Usenet conversations? Does that even count? Ƿidsiþ 07:18, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Since I've been here it always has. Mglovesfun (talk) 12:16, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
 * It doesn't really fill you with confidence though does it. I don't mind if one or two of them are from Usenet, but when all of them are it's a bit dispiriting. Ƿidsiþ 20:25, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I totally agree but I have no solution to offer. Mglovesfun (talk) 22:03, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

title: Talk:homomarriage


text: fartuquemos

title: fartuquemos


text: abotagadas

title: abotagadas


text:
Talk:genetic modification

genetic modification
I have some doubts regarding current definition: "the commercial application of genetic engineering to the production of novel foodstuffs, etc.".
 * 1) The word "commercial": is genetic modification done for scientific research called something else?
 * 2) The word "engineering": is genetic modification through natural means, i.e. by chance, cosmic radiation etc. excluded from this term?
 * 3) The word "application": if "genetic modification" includes natural modification, there's no application involved
 * 4) The word "production": ditto
 * 5) The word "foodstuff": is genetic modification of bacteria for production of drugs excluded?
 * 6) The word "novel": is genetic modification aimed at increasing crops in production of traditional foodstuffs excluded?

In summary, I agree with this part: the of genetic to the of. --Hekaheka (talk) 09:16, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

 * You don't really seem to have phrased this as an RFV; more like an RFC. I don't think naturally occuring genetic changes are usually described as genetic modification - some kind of human intervention is implied by the phrase.  I also think that modifications for purely scientific research is still often called genetic engineering.  That is easily shown with the gbooks search string engineering Dolly.  The cloning of Dolly the sheep was not for any direct commercial purpose.  I agree with you on "commercial" and "production" however, scientific research is not excluded. Spinning Spark  10:09, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, it would have been better in RFC, because I did not intend to deny the existence of this term. Anyway, if human involvement is required, but there's no need for it to be for any specific purpose, the definition would be modified to this: "Application of genetic engineering". Are we happy with that? --Hekaheka (talk) 10:48, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Isn't this an RFD? Seems like you're questioning everything in the definition, so that you're left with "any modification that is genetic in nature". Mglovesfun (talk) 13:27, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
 * For me, it wasn't an RFD-case in the beginning. I thought that the term is real but that the definition is far too narrow, and I just wanted to find out what the definition really is. So far, I think, it has become clear that in order to be called "genetic modification" an operation needs to be performed by man, but it does not need to be commercial nor does it need to be connected with production of anything. From the original definition, this leaves us "application of genetic engineering". If that is all, and if we feel it is SOP, then it should be brought to RFD. But I would prefer to agree on the definition first. --Hekaheka (talk) 17:49, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

I checked with the Lemmings. Collins, MacMillan, Cambridge, dictionary.com list both "Genetic modification" and "Genetic engineering". Collins says modification is alteration of DNA for improvement or correction of defects and engineering is alteration of DNA for research. Cambridge is on similar lines saying that modification is process of changing the structure of the genes of a living thing and that engineering is the science of it. Dictionary. com basically agrees, just with more words. Macmillan and Wikipedia believe that modification and engineering are the same thing. A search of BGC reveals that usage of "genetic modification" predates "genetic engineering" by about 40 years. As a summary, I propose that we move our current definition of genetic engineering to genetic modification and add the science aspect to genetic engineering, like this:

genetic modification
 * 1) deliberate modification of the genetic structure of an organism

genetic engineering
 * 1) practice or science of genetic modification
 * 2) genetic modification

If there are no protests, I'll proceed to make these changes within a week or so. --Hekaheka (talk) 10:32, 30 December 2013 (UTC)face va
 * I take back the comment on outdating. It was based on taking the etymology section of genetic engineering at face value. Actually the two terms appear in the publications at about the same time in early 1900's. Based on the samples available in BGC it's also hard to know whether they are used consistently or whether they were understood the same way as today - probably not, as the science has developed enormously since then.--Hekaheka (talk) 23:33, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Proposed changes done.--Hekaheka (talk) 19:18, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:genetic modification


text:
åndsvag

Etymology
From and.

Adjective

 * 1) stupid

Derived terms

 * Faroese:

title: åndsvag


text:
Template:lv-decl-indef-pro

declension of

title: Template:lv-decl-indef-pro


text:
Talk:11 մետրանոց

11 մետրանոց
I've no idea if this is real. But the Armenian Wikipedia article does not exist. SemperBlotto (talk) 22:23, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I graduated before I finished first-year Armenian 25 years ago, so I could easily be wrong, but it certainly looks like something along the lines of calling a penalty kick an "11-meter" in English. This will require someone with enough knowledge of the grammar to filter out the equivalent of "11-meter kick" and "11-meter shot", etc. User:Vahagn Petrosyan, maybe? Chuck Entz (talk) 00:26, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

 * It's real and cited. Indeed, literally it means "11-meter" and is short for "11-meter kick". --Vahag (talk) 12:05, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

title: Talk:11 մետրանոց


text:
Talk:Christmas present

From RFV
Rfv-sense: The current or upcoming Christmas. This sense was added today in response to the ongoing deletion discussion about the other sense. I'm doubtful that it can be cited outside of the phrase Ghost of Christmas Present. —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 02:31, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Hm, can you check the validity of these three sources? I'm not exactly sure what cites constitutes as being valid for the purposes of CFI, and I may be terribly biased towards keeping this. (First cite btw says "Christmas past becomes Christmas present" but it's cut off.) TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 03:11, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The first quote looks okay to me; I've added it. Google Books won't show me the third quote. As for the second quote, it is not clear to me that it supports the sense in question - the characters in that book are apparently experiencing a Christmas Carol-like vision of past, present, and future Christmases. So their "Christmas Present" seems like it's referring to the vision they're having, not just "the current or upcoming Christmas". —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 12:20, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

 * Can you do another check please? TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 23:46, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * This appears to be a grammar mistake. Should be "Christmas, present and past".
 * As this use is in a title rather than a sentence, it's hard to say if it adequately conveys meaning, as required by the criteria.
 * Same as above.
 * Might be legit, although the context is clearly related to "Ghost of Christmas Present".
 * That's the normal usage of "Christmas present", not the proposed usage.
 * "Bitch of Christmas Present" is clearly a play off of "Ghost of Christmas Present"
 * Seems legit.
 * Kaldari (talk) 01:34, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

 * There are plenty of legitimate hits for the plural --WikiTiki89 01:40, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Oh, good point. Okay, I'm satisfied that the term exists, but we need a different definition - the current definition doesn't seem to leave room for a plural. —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 02:30, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Changed def so has it become more acceptable yet? TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 04:18, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I've changed it again to reflect the uses I can find. (I also deleted a quotation that looks like "Christmas [that is] present" to me.) Look good? —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 22:41, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Actually, we still don't have any citations for the sense I originally RFVed - everything seems to support the second sense (the one I added). —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 22:25, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Actually I think that the one you added is what was meant by the sense you RFVed, just not worded very well. I think we could just merge them. --WikiTiki89 22:30, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Makes sense to me. I've merged the definitions, and I'm striking this as verified. —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 03:27, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Translations of the RFD-failed sense

 * Chinese:
 * Mandarin: 聖誕節禮物, 圣诞节礼物
 * Danish:
 * Dutch: kerstcadeau
 * Estonian: jõulukink
 * Finnish:
 * French: cadeau de Noël,
 * German:
 * Greek: χριστουγεννιάτικο δώρο
 * Icelandic:
 * Japanese: クリスマスプレゼント

 * Jèrriais: présent d'Noué
 * Maltese: rigal tal-Milied
 * Northern Sami: juovlaskeaŋka
 * Norwegian:
 * Bokmål: ,
 * Nynorsk:, jolegåve, , jolepresang
 * Romanian: cadou de Crăciun
 * Russian: рожде́ственский пода́рок, пода́рок на Рождество́
 * Spanish: regalo de Navidad
 * Swedish:

RFD discussion: December 2013–April 2014
SOP. — Ungoliant (falai) 19:03, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete . --WikiTiki89 19:10, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
 * SOP. Keφr 19:33, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
 * ...and birthday present/birthday presents? Spinning Spark  20:30, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete this, birthday present, and your little dog too. Ba humbugi. DCDuring TALK 21:05, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Christmas present and birthday present as SOP, but keep and your little dog too. bd2412 T 21:10, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

 * Santa is noting down all the names that vote delete for this. You'll all be sorry next Christmas. Spinning Spark  21:55, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep it. Are you spoilsports going to leave all those translations homeless?? Donnanz (talk) 22:01, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I appreciate the appeal, but suppose there are a few languages that have a single word for the concept of a blue umbrella, or the smell of spring, or the time half an hour after midnight - would we have entries to accommodate those translations? bd2412 T 23:37, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes. DTLHS (talk) 23:38, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
 * There are languages that have words for all of those things, so you'd better create the entries. :] You should also create [[possess a bunchberry plant]], since there's a language which has a word for that. - -sche (discuss) 03:09, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I no longer believe in the concept of words. DTLHS (talk) 03:39, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I don’t oppose converting it to a translation target. — Ungoliant (falai) 15:02, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Christmas present and birthday present per nom. - -sche (discuss) 22:04, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

 * Keep per Donnanz and DTLHS Purplebackpack89  (Notes Taken) (Locker) 23:45, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete both Christmas present and birthday present. —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 03:02, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I don't know. The whole project is so rife with SOP's that these two don't make the situation any worse. I just added Finnish translation (per request) to illegal immigration and wondered, why the heck we have it. But I guess it's lesser evil to let them be, because RFD'ing them all would totally jam this page. Then I checked illegal immigrant and it has been around since 2006. If I would have to choose between keeping "Christmas present" and "birthday present" versus keeping the two immigration terms, I would certainly choose the presents. Perhaps we should have an authorized "execution squad" which would be authorized to kill SOP's without any formalities. --Hekaheka (talk) 03:15, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The problem with that is that there are cases where one person thinks a term is SOP, but it really isn't. No one on the authorized execution squad would be infallible in their decision. --WikiTiki89 03:18, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
 * illegal immigrant is gone. — Ungoliant (falai) 15:02, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

 * I don't know how you explain an anti-SoP entry policy to the editors of foreign-language Wiktionaries. https://no.wiktionary.org/wiki/julegave
 * I suppose if you delete every Christmas-related entry it would keep the atheists, pagans, Jews, Moslems and other non-believers, as well as the North Koreans happy. Donnanz (talk) 10:02, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
 * This comment seems off-topic and inflammatory. Mglovesfun (talk) 12:33, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete as transparent, if you know what Christmas means and you know what present means, you know what this means. Mglovesfun (talk) 12:33, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Off-topic? Definitely not - look under Christmas (derived terms). Inflammatory? I guess it depends on how thin-skinned you are. My comment did not target any group in particular, and there's plenty of people who would criticise the celebration of Christmas in any form. Donnanz (talk) 13:03, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Implying that opposition to the inclusion of Christmas present in a dictionary is opposition to Christmas itself is about as useful as implying that opposition to red tricycle is opposition to tricycles (and also strikes me as somewhat "thin-skinned" itself, but that's beside the point). Do we have entries for graduation present, wedding present, housewarning present, Mother's Day present, Father's Day present, etc.? Is that because we have an agenda against mentioning graduations, weddings, housewarmings, Mother's Day, Father's Day, etc.? I love Christmas. I've given and received Christmas presents, participated in Christmas Eve services, put up Christmas lights and Christmas decorations, not to mention putting Christmas-tree ornaments on Christmas trees. I have fond memories of my family's Christmas traditions and the activities my mom had for us to do during Christmas Vacation. I still need to see good reasons why someone will need to look up Christmas present if they already know what Christmas and present mean. Chuck Entz (talk) 14:38, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
 * You seem to think that people only look things up in a dictionary to find out what they mean. Which, firstly, isn't the case, and secondly does not resolve anything because ‘present’ means all kinds of things, most of which are irrelevant to the meaning of ‘Christmas present’. Ƿidsiþ 17:12, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
 * What’s this? The Spanish Inquisition? — Ungoliant (falai) 15:02, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Well, who put the cat amongst the pigeons? Donnanz (talk) 15:16, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
 * For the record, I haven't completely made up my mind on this: there have been solid, well-reasoned comments on both sides of the issue. The ones I responded to weren't among those. To first throw in a gratuitous reference to "atheists, pagans, Jews, Moslems and other non-believers, as well as the North Koreans", then to use "thin-skinned" when challenged, seemed a bit much. Chuck Entz (talk) 16:17, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
 * If my comment caused any offence, I apologise. Donnanz (talk) 16:51, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you. It's not that I was particularly offended, but that I didn't like the direction things seemed to be going, and wanted to stop it from going any further in that direction. Chuck Entz (talk) 17:09, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
 * OK, fair enough. To be honest, I don't know where the main objection lies - is it terms derived from present, or terms derived from Christmas? As far as present is concerned, I have no objection to birthday present or Christmas present, which are very common in usage, and this is reflected by the translation entries in both cases. But I would perhaps draw the line there. Strangely enough, there is no ""Derived terms" section under present (Etymology 2). Donnanz (talk) 17:35, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

 * Keep. In the OED (first citation from Samuel Pepys! This is the sort of surprising information that good dictionaries provide). Also, remember that Scrooge is visited by the Ghost of Christmas Present: there the collocation is sum of parts, but in normal use it's a set phrase which calls on a specific noun use of present:. Ƿidsiþ 15:42, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

 * I did not realize we had a second sense of "current Christmas". If that sense is attestable then the entry should be kept, because it is not SOP, as it is not the usual word order for "present Christmas" and stems from its usage in A Christmas Carol. But delete birthday present. --WikiTiki89 19:50, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Clarification of my vote: Keep the Dickens-derived sense. Delete gift given on Christmas sense. --WikiTiki89 19:36, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Just added it and I believe it's attestable, A Christmas Carol's legacy is far-reaching. It should also be kept' on the grounds that it's not obvious what sense of present is being referred to in the set phrase Christmas present, whether the literal SOP one or the sense I just added. I have not found a reason not to delete birthday present however, but I'll continue looking for one. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 19:59, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
 * It all goes to show how fickle Wiktionary policy is regarding SoP entries. Donnanz (talk) 20:03, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Well, that's probably more a problem with notions of language than a problem with Wiktionary itself IMO. Wiktionary's mission is to include "all words in all languages", and tries to apply an objective inclusion criteria to inherently subjective interpretations of "words" and "languages", which are constantly changing and evolving. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 20:09, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Further thoughts: Christmas present in this sense uses present as a postpositive adjective, and may be uncountable. Anyway, "Christmas presents" would be the wrong plural. "Christmas present and Christmases past" is quite feasible though. Donnanz (talk) 21:27, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

 * Further thoughts on this: not all presents given at Christmas are Christmas presents, and not all Christmas presents are given at Christmas. I received some Christmas presents this year in August (from relatives that I rarely see): the point is that I keep them and open them on Christmas Day. Similarly, if I give a friend 20 quid on the 19th December, I might say ‘Consider this a present’ but it would not be a Christmas present: – unless I wrapped it up in a box and he put it under his tree until the 25th. There are all kinds of cultural and traditional assumptions involved in this term that are not obvious from Christmas: + present:. Ƿidsiþ 07:38, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 * That's not a linguistic phenomenon. They are presents given for Christmas, whether it is on Christmas or in August. --WikiTiki89 20:18, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

 * Keep. I am not really sure, but I go with Widsith, OED and Collins; see also . --Dan Polansky (talk) 19:43, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep just like we have kept Christmas card. It looks like a sum of parts because we know what it is, but it is a culturally fixed phrase and you can say [//www.google.com/search?tbm=bks&q=%22Christmas+presents+on+Christmas%22 Christmas presents on Christmas] and [//www.google.com/search?tbm=bks&q=%22Christmas+presents+for+Christmas%22 Christmas presents for Christmas]. — T AKASUGI Shinji (talk) 00:45, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

 * Interesting that Japanese has borrowed the term in full:, just like and many other compound English terms and words, which may or may not be considered SoP. --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 00:59, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

 * Alright, given all the discussion and development that has occurred here, with my involvement in creating a new home and sense for the entry, I haven't found any compelling reason to keep the first noun sense. So yeah, delete. (And I guess we will yet again consider RFDing yet another entry クリスマスプレゼント Atitarev, considering the latter is under discussion as we speak.) TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 05:03, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Because the "gift" sense was the only one present when this entry was RFDed, and the "current Christmas" sense was added after many users voted, I think any deletion of the "current Christmas" sense requires a new, separate RFD. This RFD (on the "gift" sense) shows, by my reading, a 2-to-1 majority for deletion. - -sche (discuss) 22:36, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

birthday present
Since many have already expressed their opinion that this should also be deleted (and I agree), it should also be explicitly RFDed. — Ungoliant (falai) 18:01, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Nope, keep it. I have no objection whatsoever to this entry. Donnanz (talk) 18:11, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep of course. Ƿidsiþ 20:26, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete, but I suspect that there may be a second sense of just "wrapped presents", which should be kept if attestable (for example, "The store was decorated with stacks of birthday presents."). --WikiTiki89 20:33, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
 * (In case it wasn't clear from the previous section) Keep Purplebackpack89  (Notes Taken) (Locker) 21:48, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

 * Note to whoever closes this, my vote on this entry (like some other users' votes on it) is in the previous section. - -sche (discuss) 20:32, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Same (which was delete). Mglovesfun (talk) 21:50, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Same here (also delete). bd2412 T 19:07, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Ditto. —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 19:53, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

 * Once again, don't forget the translations which several users have taken the effort to enter (not me - yet). Donnanz (talk) 14:22, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Translations are really not a good reason to keep an SOP term. --WikiTiki89 16:32, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I disagree.  Purplebackpack89  (Notes Taken) (Locker) 21:24, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Take for example "I eat" or "I am eating". As far as I know, a large percentage of all languages that exist can say that in one word: Arabic, Spanish , Polish , etc. That does not mean that we need to include I eat and I am eating to host those translations. --WikiTiki89 23:08, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Wiktionary's mission is to include "all words in all languages". I want to see your definition of what "word"/"term"/"lemma" you consider to be appropriate or legitimate in a dictionary. Does man wearing a blue hat (Equinox) constitute a legitimate "word"? Or I am not a potato. But I'll give a brief explanation of why I don't consider myself a potato? TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 23:58, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * User:Wikitiki89, while we might not have I am eating, it would probably behoove us to have an explanation of the progressive tense, which exists in English but not in romance languages. However, in general, I believe that we are being too hasty in deleting entries of more than one word.  This is an example of one that shouldn't be deleted.  television show is another.  Our job is to have a dictionary that can explain any definition anybody anywhere could possibly want  Purplebackpack89  (Notes Taken) (Locker) 00:23, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The progressive tense is irrelevant to the point I was making. I was saying that we don't need to include those terms just because a single-word translation exists in a multitude of languages. As for explaining definitions, birthday and present explain perfectly well what a birthday present is. --WikiTiki89 00:29, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

 * Having researched the term, I cannot find any conclusive evidence that this is not sum of parts. Therefore, delete TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 21:32, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, that's a pretty accurate observation, it's a sum of parts, three to be precise: birth + day + present. By some quirk of fate birth + day were combined in this sense, so that leaves us dealing with birthday + present. The page for present redirects users to gift for translations, but how often is it referred to as a birthday gift? Yes, there's an entry for that too, so you can have even more fun! Personally, I prefer the term birthday present; it's what I'm used to. Donnanz (talk) 23:44, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * in en-US or en-GB? I believe the term present by itself is used more widely than gift anyway, so the comparison between "birthday present" and "birthday gift" would be redundant. If you want we can nominate "birthday gift" as well. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 23:52, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I use British English. Donnanz (talk) 00:05, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 * There are many set terms whose meanings are perfectly transparent, it doesn't mean they should be deleted. I don't see how this is any different from, say, tennis ball:. Ƿidsiþ 11:59, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Mglovesfun (talk) 21:36, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I suppose it may be cultural and not completely obvious that the present is given to the person celebrating their birthday, not the other way around. Still, keeping on those grounds would allow for pretty much every type of present, for which that's almost universally the case. Weak delete this and gift, though I would consider allowing as a translation target despite the slippery slope arguments above. DAVilla 12:08, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Equinox ◑ 18:40, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

 * Keep. I am not really sure, but I go with Collins; see also . --Dan Polansky (talk) 19:43, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep just like we have kept birthday card. It looks like a sum of parts because we know what it is, but it is a culturally fixed phrase and you can say [//www.google.com/search?tbm=bks&q=%22birthday+presents+on+your+birthday%22 birthday presents on your birthday]. — T AKASUGI Shinji (talk) 00:45, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

 * Deleted. Commenters above were 2-to-1 in favour of deletion. - -sche (discuss) 22:36, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

birthday gift
Same as above. --WikiTiki89 00:17, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete as above. bd2412 T 00:41, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete for the same reasons as Christmas present. - -sche (discuss) 01:35, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete as above. —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 02:39, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. — Ungoliant (falai) 06:16, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

 * I knew this would happen. Both should be kept for a variety of reasons. They are synonyms for a start, and not everyone may be aware of that, especially foreign users who may not have the time nor inclination to work it all out if both entries are deleted. Donnanz (talk) 10:41, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 * They are synonyms because present and gift are synonyms, making them all the more SoPpy. --WikiTiki89 18:36, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete as I foretold. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 11:46, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. Ƿidsiþ 15:47, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep for reasons I outlined in Christmas present and birthday present above Purplebackpack89  (Notes Taken) (Locker) 20:58, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

 * I would like to make one qualification to my above !votes. If Christmas present is kept, then birthday present should also be kept as an example of the same formation, and vice versa; if birthday present is kept, then birthday gift should be kept as a synonym. Therefore, if there are any of these does not end end up having a consensus to delete, then I would prefer to see all of them kept, for consistency. bd2412 T 21:03, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Even if Christmas present is kept just for its other sense? --WikiTiki89 01:55, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I think that it is highly unlikely that the determination as to Christmas present will hinge on the second sense introduced. bd2412 T 19:19, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Oh really? --WikiTiki89 19:36, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Given that you are the only editor who would keep one and delete the other, yes, really. bd2412 T 21:10, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
 * 1. Considering how close the vote is currently, my vote could be the deciding one. 2. I think most people who voted to delete the original RFD'd sense would support keeping the Dickens-derived sense. --WikiTiki89 21:33, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
 * We don't really have "deciding votes"; the closing administrator will make a determination based on policy and consensus. bd2412 T 22:34, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
 * And also based on the votes. --WikiTiki89 22:40, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't know why you have that impression, but we have "RfD", not "VfD" here. bd2412 T 13:33, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: both of these terms seems to pass the "tennis player" test at WT:IDIOM. Ƿidsiþ 09:54, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Please explain, because I don't see how they could pass. Frankly, I don't see how tennis player passes either. --WikiTiki89 19:08, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Because there's no other word - tenniser doesn't exist, though it's tennisser in Dutch. Donnanz (talk) 20:48, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
 * There's no other word for the cat stuck in the tree, that doesn't mean we should include it. --WikiTiki89 20:51, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
 * But no one thinks we should. Unlike this. Ƿidsiþ 08:01, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The entry for tennis player was kept because we decided to keep similar entries, mostly on the grounds that they were professional titles. You wouldn't call anyone who plays tennis a tennis player. Your argument for keeping it doesn't explain why we have soccer player despite footballer. DAVilla 12:29, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * That decision was a bad one. The frequency of phrases like "bad tennis player", "poor tennis player" shows that it is often used for non-professionals. Equinox ◑ 20:16, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Even tennis player doesn't pass the tennis player test. The discussion just got botched. Mglovesfun (talk) 20:22, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete (ergo same as my vote above). Mglovesfun (talk) 19:40, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Equinox ◑ 18:40, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. No unique meaning separate from the combined meanings of the two terms. Kaldari (talk) 22:56, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

 * Deleted. WikiTiki89, Mr. Granger, Ungoliant, TeleComNasSprVen, Mglovesfun, Equinox, Kaldari and I favoured deletion; Donnanz, Ƿidsiþ and Purplebackpack89 favoured retention. My decision to resolve this RFD before resolving the other two — because a quick glance suggested the consensus on this term was clearer than the consensus on the other terms — made it hard to apply BD2412's conditional vote, but there is an approximately 2-to-1 majority favouring deletion regardless of which way BD2412's vote is counted. - -sche (discuss) 21:55, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
 * In retrospect, I'm fine with that too. I can see why we would at least have an &lit sense for the synonym at "Christmas present" without having an entry for "Christmas gift". bd2412 T 18:38, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

These are now all dealt with (either deleted or the contested senses converted to &lit) and may be archived. Cheers! bd2412 T 15:25, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:Christmas present


text:
Talk:picture framing

picture framing
Rfv-sense: a square or rectangular pattern of ridges in a roof membrane or covering over insulation or deck joints. Ƿidsiþ 15:14, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Tedious to cite, but many mentions in construction/roofing-industry glossaries. DCDuring TALK 15:49, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm satisfied, cheers. Ƿidsiþ 16:01, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

RFC discussion: April 2009–December 2013
This cleanup request was filed all the way back in April 2009: This is probably an easy one for someone who knows anything about the topic — which I don't. —Ruakh TALK 16:46, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
 * This is one of many articles by the same user. They all need looking at - but I haven't got any enthusiasm for the job. SemperBlotto 16:48, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Of the ones I know something about, the content isn't bad, though a little wordy. I'll put his new pages on my tasks. DCDuring TALK 18:10, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

 * Passing the buck somewhat, but I've moved that sense to RFV, and meanwhile added two others from the OED, plus cleaned the page up a little. Ƿidsiþ 15:16, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

title: Talk:picture framing


text:
粉腸

Noun

 * 1)  duodenum, usually of pigs
 * 2)  a kielbasa-like type of sausage

title: 粉腸


text:
daudzie

Adjective
(indef. ', no comp., no sup.; adv. ')

 * 1) the many;

title: daudzie


text:
cribless

Adjective

 * 1) Without a crib.

title: cribless


text:
bibless

Adjective

 * 1) Without a bib.
 * However, she persisted in dishing the dinner as well as cooking it, and then sat down, bibless and apronless, to partake of it as an illustrious guest
 * However, she persisted in dishing the dinner as well as cooking it, and then sat down, bibless and apronless, to partake of it as an illustrious guest

title: bibless


text:
cotless

Adjective

 * 1) Without a cot.

title: cotless


text:
Cooperian

Adjective

 * 1) Of or relating to  (1789–1851), American writer of historical romances dealing with frontier and Indian life.

title: Cooperian


text: 粉肠

title: 粉肠


text: daudzo

title: daudzo


text: daudzajiem

title: daudzajiem


text:
Talk:dismissism

dismissism
Protologism? SemperBlotto (talk) 12:15, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

 * ...which the creator kindly stuck his name on. Speedily deleted. Equinox ◑ 18:36, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:dismissism


text: daudzajām

title: daudzajām


text:
Talk:futurama

futurama
Any takers. I can't read the given reference. SemperBlotto (talk) 08:10, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The ref is a dictionary so wouldn't count as a usage cite in any case. Spinning Spark  12:03, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Added four cites. —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 13:50, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Well done, cites for this are quite difficult to find as most of the results are for proper nouns: including this 1956 magazine ad for a brand of lipstick! However, I managed to find one more good cite to add. Spinning Spark  15:06, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

 * Cited. SemperBlotto (talk) 08:34, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:futurama


text: 萨哈共和国

title: 萨哈共和国


text: daudzajos

title: daudzajos


text: daudzajās

title: daudzajās


text: 顺风车

title: 顺风车


text:
Talk:Matthias

Matthias
If it's real, it should be listed in a separate (common) Noun section. — I.S.M.E.T.A. 16:08, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
 * RFV-sense for “(gay slang) A young, attractive, slim male, usually having little body hair.”

 * I strongly doubt it's real. The definition is copied directly from twink; the edit was made by an anon [ here] doubtless as a joke. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 18:05, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

 * I see. Note also that that addition is the only contribution that User:192.109.216.31 has ever made. In my opinion, there is sufficient evidence of bad faith here to delete this sense summarily. — I.S.M.E.T.A. 18:18, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

 * Speedy deleted. --WikiTiki89 18:21, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:Matthias


text: popcorned

title: popcorned


text:
Talk:hetero-fascism

hetero-fascism
This entry has two citations, both from 2014 and both quoting Glenn Beck. Additionally, it's not obvious to me that the first one is durably archived. Because this term is apparently a very recent coinage by Glenn Beck, I think it might be difficult to find three independent citations spanning more than a year. —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 20:00, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Politically charged, in response to "homo-fascism" made earlier by religious fanatics. --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 04:19, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Created Citations:hetero-fascism. We've now got three solid cites, including a 1996 Usenet post, a 2011 New Statesman book review, and Glenn Beck's comments from his interview on Pierce Morgan Live (which was actually aired December 20, 2013, according to this rush transcript I found on the official CNN website). -Cloudcuckoolander (talk) 16:07, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
 * This word also turns up in a boilerplate author biography for that appears across several sites on the web:
 * "Rechy has suggested that all of his work (which includes plays, essays, and reviews, as well as novels) articulates the need to preserve gay "difference," which he associates with "abundant sexuality," in the face of increasing "heterofascism."
 * It's in quotes, so it suggest it's something Rechy has actually used at some point, but I have no idea where. -Cloudcuckoolander (talk) 16:18, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Okay, I'm satisfied. Withdrawn. —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 18:21, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:hetero-fascism


text:
羅省

Etymology
.

Compare 🇨🇬 and 🇨🇬.

title: 羅省


text:
Talk:娟

娟
Rfv-sense for "fascinating and elegant, bewitching" definitions. I can't find anything giving this definition or similar for this character, so it'd be nice just to have someone with a better knowledge of Mandarin look at this one to see if it's okay or not. Bumm13 (talk) 03:54, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete sense. It's made up. Checked Pleco, Nciku, CEDIC. --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 04:16, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The account was created at 10:03, used to add the sense at 10:07, used to make one change at 11:01 , then never used again. That doesn't exactly inspire confidence... Chuck Entz (talk) 06:01, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Speedied. --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 10:53, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:娟


text:
共鳴箱

Noun

 * 1) soundbox

title: 共鳴箱


text:
Media Luna

Proper noun

 * 1) A group of four departments in Bolivia – Santa Cruz, Beni, Pando, and Tarija – which became the geographic area of opposition to the national government led by  and the Movement for Socialism.

title: Media Luna


text: 共鸣箱

title: 共鸣箱


text:
Meinongian

Adjective

 * 1) Of or relating to  (1853–1920), Austrian realist philosopher.

title: Meinongian


text:
Meherrin

Noun

 * 1) A member of a group of Native Americans of rural northeastern North Carolina.

title: Meherrin


text:
Meithei

Proper noun

 * 1) A Tibeto-Burman language spoken in the southeastern Himalayan state of Manipur in India.

Synonyms

 * Meitei
 * Meetei

title: Meithei


text: 狙杀

title: 狙杀


text:
melkhout

Noun

 * 1)  The milkwood tree.

title: melkhout


text:
Citations:sınalgı

 * 2016, Hani Astolin, Tanrı'nın Göksel Çocukları ISBN 6053235717, page 475 (bolding in the original):
 * [G]örüntü, ses ve konuşmalarını aktarabilecekleri bir Sınalgı (televizyon) ve ünalgı(radyo) bir arada diyelim.
 * Let's say that there is an Inspiration (television) and a unanimity (radio) that can convey images, sounds and speeches.
 * 2015, İsmail Köseömer, Bulgaristanlı Türkler Olarak Yaklaşan Sonumuzu Görmekten Bilgisiziz (Balkanlar'da Türk Kültürü, volume 92, ISSN 1300 - 4468):
 * Bir tane bile Türk Okulu, Türk Bilimyurdu, Türk Ekin Ortayı, Türk Araştırma Ortayı, Ulusal Sınalgı ve Ünalgı Yayını olmayan topluma ne denir?
 * As Bulgarian Turks we are ignorant of seeing our approaching end.
 * What is a society called that does not have even one Turkish School, Turkish University, Turkish Cultural Center, Turkish Research Center, National 'Sınalgı' and 'Ünalgı' Broadcast?
 * 2015, Karaman Ermenek Maden Kazası Son Durumu, Ordu Postası (news website) [Not durably archived]
 * Maden ocağı yetkilisi Şahin Uyar, bir sınalgı bağdarlamasında yaptığı açıklamada, göçük altında 18 işçinin kaldığını belirtti.
 * 2014 March 5, M. Çıtır, Sınalgı verilişlerinin olumsuz etkileri, in, Usenet:
 * Ayrıca sınalgı dizilerinde bizim toplumumuza uymayan şeylerin gösterildiğini de görebiliyoruz.
 * In addition, we can see that in the television series, things that do not fit into our society are shown.

 * 2014 September 23, "serkanc..." (username), Ilk 10'a, Turkiye degil, Erdogan ailesi girecek, in, Usenet:
 * Melih Gökçek bir sınalgı arnasında katıldığı naklen yayınlanan bir bağdarlamada Kılıçdaroğlu baresinde DSP hükûmeti zamanında hazırlanan raporda Kılıçdaroğlu'nun öz akrabalarını SSK'da işe aldırdığını nakletti.

 * 2014 March 25, Yüksel Demir, Linux virüsü tehlike saçıyor!, in :
 * Fakat yancık çınkası ma sınalgı gibi çıncalık aletlerde kullanılan Linuxlarda kullanımda kolaylık olması için yönetici yetkisi olmadan daha fazla işlem yapılabiliyorsa bu tür yazılımların işletim dizimine zarar vermesi veya bu aletlerin uzaktan kontrol edilmesi gibi şeyler mümkün olabilir.
 * However, if more operations can be done without administrator's authority in order to be easier to use on Linux which is used in the appliances such as the fanfiction game, it is possible that such software could damage the operating system or control them remotely.

 * 1999, Dr. Metin Erkaya, Tefsir Sohbetleri 2 (04/24/1999 - 11/02/1999) PDF BOOK
 * (...) Ak-Sınalgı izleyicileri, Ak-Ünalgı dinleyenleri, (...) 05/11/1999 -from a radio program by M. Es'ad Coşan on AKRA FM Transmission

Notable Mentions

 * English-Turkish Dictionary by Pamukkale University

title: Citations:sınalgı


text: melkhouts

title: melkhouts


text:
diflas

Etymology
From cy.

Adjective

 * 1) boring, dull, uninteresting, miserable

title: diflas


text: ddiflas

title: ddiflas


text: niflas

title: niflas


text: diflased

title: diflased


text: ddiflased

title: ddiflased


text: niflased

title: niflased


text:
diflasach

Etymology
From.

title: diflasach


text:
daudzums

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) amount, quantity, number
 * 2) (unexpected) large amount or quantity
 * 1) (unexpected) large amount or quantity
 * 1) (unexpected) large amount or quantity
 * 1) (unexpected) large amount or quantity
 * 1) (unexpected) large amount or quantity
 * 1) (unexpected) large amount or quantity
 * 1) (unexpected) large amount or quantity
 * 1) (unexpected) large amount or quantity
 * 1) (unexpected) large amount or quantity

title: daudzums


text: ddiflasach

title: ddiflasach


text: niflasach

title: niflasach


text: diflasaf

title: diflasaf


text: ddiflasaf

title: ddiflasaf


text: niflasaf

title: niflasaf


text:
daudzum

Etymology
A reduced form of.

Adverb

 * 1)  ; very many, very much...

title: daudzum


text:
media center

Noun

 * 1) A dedicated software application or hardware device for playback of audiovisual media in the home.
 * 2) A   that incorporates information technology as well as traditional print publications.

title: media center


text: nghig

title: nghig


text:
chig

Verb

 * 1)  To chew.

Noun

 * 1)  A piece of chewing tobacco; a quid.

title: chig


text:
lad mag

Noun

 * 1)  A magazine aimed at young men, typically containing suggestive photographs of female models and articles about cars, tools, music, film, sport, and sexual encounters.

title: lad mag


text: lad mags

title: lad mags


text:
lifestyle drug

Noun

 * 1) Any medication that treats a non-life-threatening and non-painful condition such as baldness, impotence, or wrinkles.

title: lifestyle drug


text:
cyffrous

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) excited, agitate, tumultuous, rouse
 * 2) moving, exciting, stimulating

title: cyffrous


text: daudzumu

title: daudzumu


text: gyffrous

title: gyffrous


text: nghyffrous

title: nghyffrous


text: chyffrous

title: chyffrous


text: daudzuma

title: daudzuma


text: daudzumā

title: daudzumā


text: daudzumam

title: daudzumam


text: daudzumiem

title: daudzumiem


text: myd

title: myd


text: daudzumus

title: daudzumus


text: daudzumos

title: daudzumos


text: daudzumi

title: daudzumi


text:
meconium ileus

Noun

 * 1) A condition where the meconium becomes thickened and congested in the ileum, often the first sign of cystic fibrosis.

title: meconium ileus


text:
memoranduming

Noun

 * 1)  The writing of memoranda.
 * 2) * June 27, 1855,, Speech about Administrative Reform
 * I dare say there was a vast amount of minuting, memoranduming, and dispatch-boxing, on this mighty subject.

title: memoranduming


text:
Bosman

Etymology 1
Borrowed from.

Proper noun

 * 1) A Ramu language of Papua New Guinea.

Etymology
From 🇰🇲.

title: Bosman


text:
unedgy

Adjective

 * 1) Not edgy.

title: unedgy


text:
Wiktionary:English verbs

Tests for verb part of speech
Most English verbs are obviously verbs, but some words that might be forms of verb are spelled identically to words that are singular or plural forms of nouns (ending in ∅, -s/es}, adjectives (ending in -ing or -ed), or gerunds (nouns) (ending in -ing and able to form plurals).

To place such words in part of speech categories, whether defined traditionally or in some more modern way, Wiktionary needs some tests, preferably definitive ones.

If a candidate verb is transitive, then it can help to find uses in which it is clear that there is an object or that and "-ed" form is clearly passive, ie, accompanied by a prepositional phrase headed by by.

Otherwise it is necessary to check for use of the putative verb with manner adverbs.

title: Wiktionary:English verbs


text:
non dire né ai né bai

Phrase

 * 1) don't say a word

title: non dire né ai né bai


text:
piangere sul latte versato

Etymology
lit. 'cry over spilt milk'.

Verb

 * 1) cry over spilled milk

title: piangere sul latte versato


text: skjelettet

title: skjelettet


text: skjeletter

title: skjeletter


text: skjeletta

title: skjeletta


text: skjelettene

title: skjelettene


text:
è un piacere

Phrase

 * 1) it's a pleasure

title: è un piacere


text: gerddoriaeth

title: gerddoriaeth


text: ngherddoriaeth

title: ngherddoriaeth


text: cherddoriaeth

title: cherddoriaeth


text:
non c'è che dire

Phrase

 * 1) without a doubt
 * 2) no doubt

title: non c'è che dire


text: planktonologist

title: planktonologist


text: planktonology

title: planktonology


text: planktonologists

title: planktonologists


text: planktonological

title: planktonological