text:
Talk:-ingatun

-ington
It may be common to see this at the end of a place name, but does it actually have any meaning in modern English? Or is it just a cranberry morpheme? 10:42, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'm surprised that survived so long with various people editing it when the definition is completely wrong (you can't romanize something that is already in the Latin alphabet). As far as I can tell it is nothing more than.
 * Wow that's terrible, I say speedy delete. Mglovesfun (talk) 11:26, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I've improved the entry by removing the 'definition' (sad but true). Mglovesfun (talk) 11:27, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Do we think that -ingtun is any better? DCDuring TALK 12:45, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't know whether -ingtun should exist or not, but the current definition is very bad. --WikiTiki89 (talk) 13:00, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is simply the case of two independent, no-longer-productive morphemes being coincidentally found together in some place names (and the surnames derived from them). Chuck Entz (talk) 13:53, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
 * And, while we're at it, delete,, which seems to have been created solely as something for -ington to link to. I would be astonished if it existed as an actual suffix in Old English. I also have my doubts about -tun, which seems to be just tun as used in compounds (though I notice we have -town). At the very least, we need to take out the reference to -ington/-ingtun Chuck Entz (talk) 14:03, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
 * And delete -ingatun, too Chuck Entz (talk) 14:14, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Does a suffix have to be productive in order to be catalogued as an entry? I thought it just needed meaning. It is a very prevalent place-name termination (Lexington, Arlington, Wellington, Washington) and the origin is not always simply -ing + -ton. However, to be honest, I really see no value in having place-name terminations in a dictionary, except for interest's sake (the entry at -ville: is very informative). What then about ? Don't we have to be fair? Or can we get -ington: up to the same level? My vote is to improve and re-assess and see if it's worth anything before removing. Personally, I often find myself wandering in thought about such things like: does the '-ington' in "Washington" really mean anything? Where did it come from?. Is Wiktionary the place to help answer these types of questions? Leasnam (talk) 14:20, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
 * It should have been demonstrably productive at some time, I would think. If not, it doesn't seem to meet the linguistic definition of suffix. DCDuring TALK 14:30, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

 * My point is that it isn't a suffix at all. It's two suffixes: -ing, which is used by itself in many town names, as well is with other word elements such as dale and worth, and -ton, which is also commonly found without -ing. It's really a two-step suffixation process: first add -ing to denote "something/someone related to..." and then add -tun "town". In other words, it often means "town of the X-ings". Don't forget, also, that there are Old English personal names ending in -ing, so it sometimes originally meant "X-ing's town". Chuck Entz (talk) 14:46, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The two-step suffixation is a strong hypothesis in two senses: it seems likely to be usually true and it can be disconfirmed with a single counterexample. Some contemporary compound suffixes seem to have been productive in the sense that there is little or no evidence that any intermediate form came into use before the word with the compound suffix. IMO, the synchronic approach to etymology has a lot to answer for here at Wiktionary in terms of failing to meet any burden of empirical demonstration for claims of affixation. DCDuring TALK 14:58, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

deleted all -- Liliana • 17:41, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

-ingtun
Many of the same issue apply. DCDuring TALK 15:00, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Compounding can be a generator of new suffixes: -ation:, -ative:, -ling:, -kin:, -ren: were all created in this way--though some of these have not remained as transparent as -ington. Leasnam (talk) 19:10, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Sure. But have either of these ever actually been productive? DCDuring TALK 21:17, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

-ingatun
I don't necessarily favour deletion, I just thought this entry needed to be considered along with -ingtun. - -sche (discuss) 21:45, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:-ingatun


text:
Talk:-ren

-ren
Never productive as a suffix, AFAICT. See WT:TR. DCDuring TALK 14:39, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Perhaps, perhaps not; but either way, it is a suffix and should be catalogued. Leasnam (talk) 20:37, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure it is a suffix, rather a remnant. If it's not used to form words, it's not a suffix, is it? Being the final three letter of more than one word isn't enough. Mglovesfun (talk) 20:41, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
 * If it were only found in children I would have to agree, but take a look at the entry. There are other plural formation which utilise it. Leasnam (talk) 21:48, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
 * But none were ever formed by adding -ren to a stem. They were apparently formed by adding -en to something ending in "ru". This is the kind of thing that discredits us. It is not founded on either a diachronic or a synchronic view, but rather some idiochronic view that no one seems to share. DCDuring TALK 22:09, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Regardless of how it was formed, in Mod Eng it is one suffix. Compare to suffixes created by compounding (-let:, -ation:, etc.). The argument that it was formed from two distinct endings doesn't negate the fact that it is now joined together as one new morpheme. Leasnam (talk) 22:27, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Your rationale works for Middle English, where -ren/-eren, though they exist, would not be considered suffixes; rather two individual suffixes occuring in succession. Leasnam (talk) 22:31, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Maybe if it were spelt -eren we could say it was -er: + -en:, but it would still have been formed in the ME period and thus bequeathed to us already packaged as a single unit... Leasnam (talk) 22:39, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Exactly... We could argue that -ren is composed of two suffixes, but then what is -er? If -ren isn't a suffix, then -er certainly isn't because there are no words with -er, only words with -ren. 23:05, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
 * What did it produce and when? DCDuring TALK 23:26, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
 * -ingstock is a suffix, too, isn't it? DCDuring TALK 23:28, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The plural of child. Now. 23:29, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
 * It is simply preposterous to claim that current English language learners produce children by inflecting child. The common occurrence of childs among younguns learning English (and others) puts paid to such a claim. But perhaps you have some evidence? DCDuring TALK 16:36, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
 * And why is that preposterous? It's true that most will try "childs" first, but you need to understand why they try that first. When it comes to word formation you can't ignore each person's own intuitions for the language, and linguists nowadays commonly agree that language learners build their own form of the language internally as they go. So when a learner needs the plural of a word for which they have not yet learned the plural, they generalise and extrapolate from what patterns of plural formation they already know. They already know a lot of words which form their plural by adding -s to the singular, so that is what they are likely to use (likely, not certain!). Of course, they will eventually come upon children, which goes counter to their intuitions. But it's human nature to recognise patterns, so in the process they also learn a new pattern in which the singular vowel is changed and -ren is added. Eventually a learner will have learned -s, -en, -ren and umlaut plurals, and they will then have four possible ways of forming the plural, of which the first is vastly more likely. But any pattern, no matter how irregular, can be generalised. We do have meese and boxen. So the only way to argue that -ren is not a suffix would be to argue that the human mind is not capable of seeing the pattern between child and children.
 * It may also be good to look at German. History has shown, in the case of German, that even a rare plural ending can become more common and productive. Even rare patterns can be extended and generalised. The -er ending of German (often combined with umlaut) is the cognate of this very same ending -ren, and it was no more common in Old High German than it was in Old English. Yet somehow in German it was extended and became much more common. Although it's unlikely, if this can happen to German, it can happen to English too. If German speakers can recognise the pattern stem + -er, then why wouldn't English speakers recognise stem + -ren? I see no reason why they wouldn't. 17:16, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't understand the equating of this with -let and -ation, which can be found added (or suffixed, we might say) to many relatively recent words: strangelet, hatchetation. Who added -ren to anything in modern English? Remember, it's listed as a modern English suffix — that means it operates as a suffix in modern English, and not just that it happens to be a relic attached to some words that have survived into modern English from earlier varieties. I also don't understand CodeCat's comment because the word children was clearly not produced "now" and probably wasn't produced in modern English. Equinox ◑ 00:36, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
 * What do you consider 'produced'? If people need the plural of child, they produce children. You seem to argue that children is completely opaque to modern speakers and that they have no concept of any morphological subdivision within the word. But I doubt that is true and that people probably do understand the process that goes into forming the plural of that word. Being productive isn't a requirement for being a suffix, and just because no new words have been formed with it in modern English doesn't suddenly mean it's not still recognisable as a separate morpheme. Think of it this way: it's not used to produce new words, but it's still used to produce existing words. So I argue that it is etymologically -er + -en, but to modern speakers it's a single suffix -ren. 09:00, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Should we have -ce for the plural of penny and die? Furius (talk) 12:35, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
 * For die I'd say yes, and if it's the same ending that's in penny then I suppose so too, although the derivation process is not as transparent in the latter (you remove -ny first). 13:03, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Actually, I'm not sure it's completely unproductive in modern English. In formal registers, sure, but a Google search for "my dogren" finds a fair few people using "dog + -ren", by analogy to "child + -ren", to suggest that their dogs are their family. It's a bit like the -en plural prefix. No-one uses it seriously, but some people still use it as a joke or to make a point (see boxen). Smurrayinchester (talk) 13:14, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
 * I still tend to think this doesn't exist in English, the same way that torero exists in English, but should not be categorized in Category:English words suffixed with -ero as the suffixing happened before the word reached English. Mglovesfun (talk) 15:50, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Even if one could find a single usage instance of dogren in a durably archived source (I couldn't), the alternative explanations of "blend of dog and children" or "contraction of "dog-children" would have to be excluded by something other than the whim or lack of imagination of the contributor(s) - and preferably more than the whims of multiple voters. Productivity should have led to more than a single candidate instance, in any event. I will test "dogren" at some local dog runs, though. I may have heard it before, like granddog. Admittedly, our search tools are not very good for finding rare instances of morpheme productivity, which some say is the best evidence. The two places where I can conveniently use wildcard search are the BYU corpora and OneLook. Though the BYU corpora are quite large they are not large enough to dependably find truly rare terms. OneLook requires that some included glossary or reference work have an entry, which certainly excludes most very rare terms. DCDuring TALK 16:30, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Hits for "kidren" can also be quite easily found:

And though not exactly the same, ...
 * 1) *2006, Timothy White, Catch a fire: the life of Bob Marley:
 * As Ciddy and child had slept soundly under Omeriah's roof, a group of young "kidren" playing outside sang a "ring song" [...]
 * 1) *2006, Alex Wheatle, Island songs:
 * Unruly kidren would fling rockstone after him.
 * 1) *2012, Jack Caseros, Onwards & Outwards:
 * Twenty-one year-old man too old to have patience for dem dere kidren playin' therr on the lawn.
 * 1) *2008, Douglas Sarine, Kent Nichols, The Ninja Handbook:
 * This exercise will help you develop the skills to tell your ninja brethren (and sistren and thingren) apart. Leasnam (talk) 17:45, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Finally, -ren is historically recognised as a suffix. A Google search for "-ren" suffix evinces this sufficiently I think. Leasnam (talk) 18:24, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

 * Leasnam's quotations show that -ren is still used as a suffix in English; as long as we have an entry for that reason (i.e. for kidren, thingren, etc), it makes sense to describe children in the same entry. How about ? (Somewhat similar, perhaps, is -ieren, which could also be analysed as -ier-/-ier + -en, but which should still have its own entry.) - -sche (discuss) 07:21, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

However, the authorities who regard the suffix on children (and brethren, sistren etc) as -en or -n rather than -ren should be acknowledged in a usage note. George Rice Carpenter's 1910 English grammar (page 56) also interprets the suffix of children as being the same as the one on oxen, -en. - -sche (discuss) 07:30, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Hans Frede Nielsen, From Dialect to Standard: English in England 1154-1776, volume 2, section 14.2, pages 238-239:
 * more n-plurals were retained by early Modern English than we find today, cf. eyen, hosen, oxen, peasen and the analogical forms brethren, children, kine, shoone, sistren.
 * Sure, it will go in my curiosity cabinet. DCDuring TALK 14:32, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

 * To rephrase my comment slightly, Leasnam's examples should that even if -ren did not originate as a single suffix, it is not interpreted as one in "child" → "children" and consequently "thing" is inflected "thingren" in the above quotation. - -sche (discuss) 20:12, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

 * Who's to say that in Leasnam's example the author isn't just adding -er: + -en:? --WikiTiki89 (talk) 08:35, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

 * They didn't add -er: + -en:, because that would have resulted in "thingeren". Did they add -r: + -en:? Well, does -r: exist as a plural suffix? If not, then the possibility that they added -r: + -en: as discrete units is removed. (Possibly relevant, or at least interesting: Talk:-icity.) - -sche (discuss) 09:01, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

 * changing -er to -r before a vowel is pretty common (parameter: > parametrize:, center: > central:). --WikiTiki89 (talk) 09:38, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
 * parametrize is an alternative spelling of parameterize:. For central, the change did not occur as a part of normal English processes, but was done in Latin, then borrowed into English separate from center:. Leasnam (talk) 17:39, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Well originally -er: was -re:, since in Old English it was -ru:. Those are minor details. --WikiTiki89 18:04, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

deleted nominated sense, kept nonstandard sense. -- Liliana • 15:44, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Back-formation from children AND BRETHREN
2008, Douglas Sarine, Kent Nichols, The Ninja Handbook: This exercise will help you develop the skills to tell your ninja brethren (and sistren and thingren) apart. Simply match the name of each famous ninja with his/her/its deadly eyes.

This example is clearly a back-formation from brethren, not from children. Both are cases where "-ren" comes from -en suffixed to a word ending in -er (the difference being that -er was never a suffix in brother).

On a side note, I notice that brethren is not listed on the "Category:English words suffixed with -ren" page, even though children is. I don't know if that's good or not, though it does make some sense, seeing as brother > brethren is not a simple case of adding a -ren suffix while children is.
 * That's right, brethren and sistren only add -en, not -ren Leasnam (talk) 05:15, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Talk:-ren


text:
個室

Noun

 * 1) room for one person

title: 個室


text:
vertippen

Etymology
.

Verb

 * 1) to mistype

title: vertippen


text:
ズアオアトリ

Noun

 * 1)  chaffinch

title: ズアオアトリ


text:
Talk:indicate

indicate
rfd-sense #4: "To investigate the condition or power of, as of steam engine, by means of an indicator." I believe "investigate" is wrong here, and the correct verb could be e.g. "to show", which would make this a specific case of sense #1. Another interpretation is that this is a definition of some other verb, such as "to inspect". --Hekaheka (talk) 04:27, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
 * That is the Webster 1913 definition, verbatim. Could be just call it dated, if it were cited? Is an indicator perhaps a specific device?
 * Eureka. Century has this encyclopedic definition of such an indicator: A steam (cylinder) pressure-gage. It is an apparatus for recording the variations of pressure or vacuum in the cylinder of a steam-engine. The accompanying cut represents a type of the indicator. The pipe with the stop-cock is screwed to the cylinder so that when the cock is opened the pressure of the steam within may enter the cylinder above, press the piston upward against the action of a spring constructed to give a definite resistance in pounds per square inch, and cause the lever-arm to rise and mark on the hollow cylinder at the left a vertical trace, the altitude of which measures the pressure. A card or a sheet of paper may be fitted to this cylinder, and the trace be made on the paper. The hollow cylinder is free to revolve, if drawn by the loose cord hanging from it. To operate the indicator, the cord is connected with some moving part of the engine so that a single stroke of the piston causes the cylinder and the card to revolve once (the return being secured by a spring) as the pencil makes one mark. Since the pencil-mark is timed to one stroke of the engine, the resulting curved line on the card gives a graphic report of the pressure or vacuum of the steam during one complete stroke. Such graphic curves are called indicator-diagrams, the marked card being called an indicator-card. See indicator-diagram, under diagram. DCDuring TALK 05:20, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Wow! Perhaps the sense should be tagged somehow to indicate that this is a very specific usage. --Hekaheka (talk) 05:55, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
 * I believe these are citations:
 * 1903, "How to indicate an engine" in The Star Improved Steam Engine Indicator, page 64:
 * To a person who is familiar with the use of an indicator, whether it be of one make or another, it is needless to give instructions as to how an engine should be indicated, [...]
 * 1905, Power, volume 25, page 448
 * I found it fully as easy to indicate an engine at a speed of 320 to 340 revolutions as at 80.
 * 1905, Central station, volume 5, page 76
 * An indicator will give the working of these valves at all times and soon return its cost in higher engine efficiency. The day has passed when it was only the expert who could indicate an engine or afford to own an indicator.
 * Oddly, all the citations I could find fell in the very narrow band of 1901 to 1905. I wonder if it was a piece of engineering jargon that just never really caught on (or a strange hole in Google's collection). Smurrayinchester (talk) 15:48, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Right around preparation time for Century and MW 1913. Webster 2nd c. 1934 expanded their 1913 def of indicator imitating and possibly surpassing Century's def, so it still had some currency then. MW online has a much reduced definition in the same sense. But now it seems as quaint as telex, twx, modem, parallel printer port are and carburetor and fax soon will be. DCDuring TALK 16:17, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
 * What seems to have happened is that "indicating" became a much less skilled task, with the improvement of the instruments and the dissemination of knowledge about reading the "indicator cards" and charts and other types of diagnostic and control instruments (indicators). There is plenty of discussion in the 21st century about "indicated pressure" in discussions of turbines and internal-combustion engines. DCDuring TALK 16:34, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. It's real, it's cited, and it's not covered by any other sense. Equinox ◑ 00:53, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

kept -- Liliana • 16:52, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

To + indirect object
To show someone else where something is, usually by pointing or nodding towards it: its indirect object would always have to in front of it. --Backinstadiums (talk) 18:01, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:indicate


text:
siquiátricu

Adjective

 * 1) psychiatric

title: siquiátricu


text: psiquiátricu

title: psiquiátricu


text:
psiquiatre

Noun

 * 1) psychiatrist

title: psiquiatre


text:
inspetor

Etymology
.

Adjective

 * 1) surveying, that surveys

Noun

 * 1) inspector, examiner
 * 2) surveyor

title: inspetor


text:
interferência

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) interference (all senses)

title: interferência


text: assumpted

title: assumpted


text: assumpting

title: assumpting


text:
infantaria

Etymology
Borrowed from.

Noun

 * 1) infantry

title: infantaria


text:
overscore

Verb

 * 1)  To draw a line through; to cross out.
 * 2)  To score (a piece of music) for too many instruments.
 * 1)  To score (a piece of music) for too many instruments.

title: overscore


text: overscores

title: overscores


text:
irmãozinho

Etymology
From.

title: irmãozinho


text:
intuição

Etymology
. Cognate with 🇨🇬 and 🇨🇬. .

Noun

 * 1) intuition
 * 2) hunch, feeling, presentment

title: intuição


text:
Talk:í

í
Deletion of both Portuguese senses. Not dictionary material. 203.158.38.67 06:38, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Seems worth keeping, but with a better definition. How does that sound? Mglovesfun (talk) 10:34, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
 * No. delete and replace with a generic "A letter of the Portuguese alphabet" definition. The information should go into a Usage notes section, if at all. -- Liliana • 10:40, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm assuming it's the acute accent which makes the difference, so the definition should actually be at ´, am I right? Mglovesfun (talk) 13:36, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Appendix material. — Ungoliant (Falai) 02:18, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

 * Delete. By the way, I've now removed the from the first sense and added  to the whole Portuguese entry, to reflect the nominator's apparent intent. —Ruakh TALK 06:46, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

deleted -- Liliana • 12:46, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

title: Talk:í


text:
insuportável

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) unsupportable, unbearable, intolerable

title: insuportável


text:
suportável

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) supportable, bearable, tolerable

title: suportável


text:
incomum

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) uncommon, unusual

title: incomum


text:
tiroteio

Etymology 1
, or from ; otherwise directly from. In any case ultimately from.

Noun

 * 1) shooting
 * 2) shootout
 * 3) gunfire sound of shots
 * 4)  debate; argument

title: tiroteio


text: ungainlinesses

title: ungainlinesses


text: trothplighting

title: trothplighting


text: policiais

title: policiais


text:
trevas

Etymology
From, from accusative plural of. Compare 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) darkness, gloom
 * 2) * 1628-1691, João Ferreira de Almeida, A Bíblia Sagrada, Gênesis, Capitulo 1
 * "pt"

- E a terra era sem forma e vazia; e havia trevas sobre a face do abismo; e o Espírito de Deus se movia sobre a face das águas.

title: trevas


text:
publicidade

Etymology
, derived from.

Noun

 * 1) publicity
 * 2) advertising, advertisement

title: publicidade


text:
privacidade

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) privacy

title: privacidade


text: mereceres

title: mereceres


text: merecermos

title: merecermos


text: merecerdes

title: merecerdes


text: merecerem

title: merecerem


text: merecendo

title: merecendo


text: merecidos

title: merecidos


text: merecida

title: merecida


text: merecidas

title: merecidas


text: mereço

title: mereço


text: mereceis

title: mereceis


text: merecem

title: merecem


text: merecia

title: merecia


text: merecias

title: merecias


text: merecíeis

title: merecíeis


text: mereciam

title: mereciam


text: mereci

title: mereci


text: mereceste

title: mereceste


text: mereceu

title: mereceu


text: merecestes

title: merecestes


text: mereceram

title: mereceram


text: merecera

title: merecera


text: mereceras

title: mereceras


text: merecêramos

title: merecêramos


text: merecêreis

title: merecêreis


text: merecerei

title: merecerei


text: merecereis

title: merecereis


text: merecerão

title: merecerão


text: mereceria

title: mereceria


text: merecerias

title: merecerias


text:
piedade

Etymology
From (13th century, ), from.

Noun

 * 1) piety
 * 2) pity, compassion

Etymology
From, from.

Noun

 * 1) piety
 * 2) pity, compassion

title: piedade


text: mereceríeis

title: mereceríeis


text: mereceriam

title: mereceriam


text: mereça

title: mereça


text: mereças

title: mereças


text: mereçamos

title: mereçamos


text: mereçais

title: mereçais


text: mereçam

title: mereçam


text: merecesse

title: merecesse


text: merecesses

title: merecesses


text: merecêssemos

title: merecêssemos


text: merecêsseis

title: merecêsseis


text: merecessem

title: merecessem


text: merecei

title: merecei


text:
㡻

Han character

 * 1) (non-classical form of 廖) name of the small ancient state of Liao

title: 㡻


text:
arrepender

Etymology
From +, from , from. Suffixation perhaps to avoid confusion with the unrelated.

Compare 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1)  to repent
 * 2)  to regret
 * 1)  to regret

title: arrepender


text: arrependeres

title: arrependeres


text: arrependermos

title: arrependermos


text: arrependerdes

title: arrependerdes


text: arrependerem

title: arrependerem


text: arrependendo

title: arrependendo


text: arrependes

title: arrependes


text: arrependemos

title: arrependemos


text: arrependeis

title: arrependeis


text: arrependem

title: arrependem


text: arrependia

title: arrependia


text: arrependias

title: arrependias


text: arrependíamos

title: arrependíamos


text: arrependíeis

title: arrependíeis


text: arrependiam

title: arrependiam


text: arrependeste

title: arrependeste


text: arrependeu

title: arrependeu


text: arrependestes

title: arrependestes


text: arrependeram

title: arrependeram


text: arrependera

title: arrependera


text: arrependeras

title: arrependeras


text: arrependêramos

title: arrependêramos


text: arrependêreis

title: arrependêreis


text: arrependerei

title: arrependerei


text: arrependerás

title: arrependerás


text: arrependerá

title: arrependerá


text: arrependeremos

title: arrependeremos


text: arrependereis

title: arrependereis


text: arrependerão

title: arrependerão


text: arrependeria

title: arrependeria


text: arrependerias

title: arrependerias


text: arrependeríamos

title: arrependeríamos


text: arrependeríeis

title: arrependeríeis


text: arrependeriam

title: arrependeriam


text: arrependamos

title: arrependamos


text: arrependais

title: arrependais


text: arrependesse

title: arrependesse


text: swingled

title: swingled


text: arrependesses

title: arrependesses


text: arrependêssemos

title: arrependêssemos


text: arrependêsseis

title: arrependêsseis


text: arrependessem

title: arrependessem


text: arrependei

title: arrependei


text: applicated

title: applicated


text: applicating

title: applicating


text:
Arianize

Verb

 * 1)  To make Arian, or act as an Arian.

title: Arianize


text: Arianizing

title: Arianizing


text: Arianizes

title: Arianizes


text: Arianized

title: Arianized


text:
brloh

Etymology
, from.

Noun

 * 1) den home of certain animals

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) den home of certain animals
 * 2)  doss, scratcher poor bed
 * 3)  lair of a criminal

title: brloh


text:
lučba

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  chemistry

Noun

 * 1)  chemistry

title: lučba


text: donatives

title: donatives


text:
osnovica

Noun

 * 1)  foundation

title: osnovica


text:
trente et un

Numeral

 * 1) thirty-one

title: trente et un


text:
povijedati

Adverb

 * 1)  to say

title: povijedati


text:
sur son trente et un

Adjective

 * 1)  all dressed up, dolled up (to the nines)

title: sur son trente et un


text:
jakkoksi

Etymology
From, from +.

Noun

 * 1) yak

title: jakkoksi


text: Category:Faroese terms derived from Tibetan


text:
frescoing

Noun

 * 1) A fresco.
 * The ceiling was covered in ornate frescoings.

title: frescoing


text:
jurisdição

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1)  jurisdiction

title: jurisdição


text: juros

title: juros


text:
justificação

Etymology
..

Noun

 * 1) justification

title: justificação


text: interrogatórios

title: interrogatórios


text: ilusões

title: ilusões


text: irmandades

title: irmandades


text: injecções

title: injecções


text: injeções

title: injeções


text: iscos

title: iscos


text: informadores

title: informadores


text: inocências

title: inocências


text: iates

title: iates


text: inspetores

title: inspetores


text: interferências

title: interferências


text: infantarias

title: infantarias


text: irmãozinhos

title: irmãozinhos


text: intuições

title: intuições


text: tiroteios

title: tiroteios


text: privacidades

title: privacidades


text: jurisdições

title: jurisdições


text: justificações

title: justificações


text: inaceitáveis

title: inaceitáveis


text: monástica

title: monástica


text: monásticos

title: monásticos


text: monásticas

title: monásticas


text: insuportáveis

title: insuportáveis


text: incomuns

title: incomuns


text:
júnior

Etymology
, a contracted form of, from.

Noun

 * 1) junior
 * 2)  penis

Etymology
, a contracted form of, from.

Noun

 * 1) junior
 * 2) novice

title: júnior


text: jornalistas

title: jornalistas


text:
Maikki

Etymology
From a diminutive form of and.

title: Maikki


text:
jarda

Etymology 1
Borrowed from.

Noun

 * 1)  English or American yard

Usage notes
Prior to Portuguese metrication, sometimes used in commerce by the Portuguese themselves, reckoned directly as $5/6$ of a.

Etymology 2
Borrowed from.

Noun

 * 1)  anabolic steroid

title: jarda


text:
miolos

Noun

 * 1)  brain

title: miolos


text: viesse

title: viesse


text: uzağım

title: uzağım


text: vínheis

title: vínheis


text: uzağın

title: uzağın


text: viéreis

title: viéreis


text:
uzağı

Adverb

 * 1) at most, at the most, maximum, up to, at best, max i.e., no more than

title: uzağı


text: striplights

title: striplights


text: uzaklar

title: uzaklar


text: viésseis

title: viésseis


text: viesses

title: viesses


text: viéssemos

title: viéssemos


text: yakınım

title: yakınım


text:
xanthaangom

Etymology
Compound of.

Noun

 * 1) xanthan gum

title: xanthaangom


text: viessem

title: viessem


text: yakının

title: yakının


text:
miserável

Etymology
.

Adjective

 * 1) miserable
 * 2) wretched
 * 3) miserly

title: miserável


text: yakını

title: yakını


text: yakınlar

title: yakınlar


text:
proibido

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) prohibited, forbidden
 * 2) illegal

title: proibido


text:
pontapé

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) kick with the toe
 * 2)  mistake, blunder

title: pontapé


text:
surpreender

Etymology
, with conjugation based on related Portuguese verbs like ; cf. .

Verb

 * 1) to surprise
 * 2) to astonish

title: surpreender


text: surpreenderes

title: surpreenderes


text: surpreendermos

title: surpreendermos


text: surpreenderdes

title: surpreenderdes


text: surpreenderem

title: surpreenderem


text: surpreendendo

title: surpreendendo


text:
surpreendido

Etymology
Past participle of.

Adjective

 * 1) surprised
 * 2) astonished, amazed
 * 3) startled, perplexed

title: surpreendido


text: surpreendidos

title: surpreendidos


text: surpreendida

title: surpreendida


text: surpreendidas

title: surpreendidas


text: surpreendo

title: surpreendo


text: surpreendes

title: surpreendes


text: surpreende

title: surpreende


text: surpreendemos

title: surpreendemos


text: surpreendeis

title: surpreendeis


text: surpreendem

title: surpreendem


text: surpreendia

title: surpreendia


text: surpreendias

title: surpreendias


text: surpreendíamos

title: surpreendíamos


text: surpreendíeis

title: surpreendíeis


text: surpreendiam

title: surpreendiam


text: surpreendi

title: surpreendi


text: surpreendeste

title: surpreendeste


text: surpreendeu

title: surpreendeu


text: surpreendestes

title: surpreendestes


text: surpreenderam

title: surpreenderam


text: surpreendera

title: surpreendera


text: surpreenderas

title: surpreenderas


text: surpreendêramos

title: surpreendêramos


text: surpreendêreis

title: surpreendêreis


text: surpreenderei

title: surpreenderei


text: surpreenderás

title: surpreenderás


text: surpreenderá

title: surpreenderá


text: surpreenderemos

title: surpreenderemos


text: surpreendereis

title: surpreendereis


text: surpreenderão

title: surpreenderão


text: surpreenderia

title: surpreenderia


text: surpreenderias

title: surpreenderias


text: surpreenderíamos

title: surpreenderíamos


text: surpreenderíeis

title: surpreenderíeis


text: surpreenderiam

title: surpreenderiam


text: surpreenda

title: surpreenda


text: surpreendas

title: surpreendas


text: surpreendamos

title: surpreendamos


text: surpreendais

title: surpreendais


text: surpreendam

title: surpreendam


text: surpreendesse

title: surpreendesse


text: surpreendesses

title: surpreendesses


text: surpreendêssemos

title: surpreendêssemos


text: surpreendêsseis

title: surpreendêsseis


text: surpreendessem

title: surpreendessem


text: surpreendei

title: surpreendei


text:
pelotão

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) platoon, squad
 * 2) peloton

title: pelotão


text:
solitário

Etymology
Borrowed from. See also the inherited doublet.

Adjective

 * 1) solitary, lone

Noun

 * 1) solitaire (gemstone)

title: solitário


text: homoousians

title: homoousians


text: divirtam

title: divirtam


text: divirto

title: divirto


text: divertem

title: divertem


text:
mortíferu

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) deadly

title: mortíferu


text: divertias

title: divertias


text: decompounding

title: decompounding


text: decompounded

title: decompounded


text: augurated

title: augurated


text: augurating

title: augurating


text:
物干し綱

Noun

 * 1) clothesline

title: 物干し綱


text:
洗濯ばさみ

Etymology
🇰🇲

Noun

 * 1) a clothespin

title: 洗濯ばさみ


text: 洗濯挟み

title: 洗濯挟み


text: tittle-tattles

title: tittle-tattles


text:
bonesa

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) goodness

title: bonesa


text:
aan weerszijden

Alternative forms

 * (less common form)

Prepositional phrase

 * 1) on both sides
 * Parkeren is verboden aan weerszijden van de weg.
 * Parking is forbidden on both sides of the road.

title: aan weerszijden


text:
aan weerszij

Prepositional phrase

 * 1) on either side
 * 2) on both sides

title: aan weerszij


text:
aan weerskanten

Prepositional phrase

 * 1) on both sides
 * Er stonden palmen aan weerskanten van de weg.
 * There were palm trees on both sides of the road.

title: aan weerskanten


text:
口堅い

Adjective

 * 1) closemouthed, tight-lipped

title: 口堅い


text: Oktaha

title: Oktaha


text:
daggered

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) Wearing or carrying a dagger.

title: daggered


text:
edulcorant

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) Having a tendency to purify or sweeten by removing or correcting acidity and acrimony.

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) sweetener

title: edulcorant


text: cockered

title: cockered


text: cockering

title: cockering


text:
henkilökohtainen valmentaja

Etymology
;

Noun

 * 1) personal trainer

title: henkilökohtainen valmentaja


text: garths

title: garths


text: Æthelbert

title: Æthelbert


text:
㡼

Han character

 * 1) granary
 * 2) cabin (as in on a ship)
 * 3) corridor, hallway

title: 㡼


text:
ungarlanded

Adjective

 * 1) Not garlanded.

title: ungarlanded


text:
㡽

Han character

 * 1) depraved talking

title: 㡽


text:
㡾

Han character

 * 1) threshold
 * 2) doorsill

title: 㡾


text: 㡿

title: 㡿


text:
extramental

Adjective

 * 1) Outside of the mind or intellect.

title: extramental


text: nervewracking

title: nervewracking


text:
freightable

Adjective

 * 1) Capable of being freighted; transportable.

title: freightable


text:
hasteless

Adjective

 * 1) Without haste; leisurely.

title: hasteless


text:
㢀

Han character

 * 1) side room

title: 㢀


text:
㢁

Han character

 * 1) (same as 㢋) vast
 * 2) to open up, enlarge or expand
 * 3) blot of a door
 * 4) door latch
 * 5) name of a person

title: 㢁


text:
unlamenting

Adjective

 * 1) Not lamenting.

title: unlamenting


text:
User talk:SBaker43

Synonyms
The gloss was correct. It shows which sense this is the opposite of. Equinox ◑ 20:45, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the trouble. SBaker43 (talk) 21:33, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

title: User talk:SBaker43


text: appreciateth

title: appreciateth


text: annulates

title: annulates


text: curvetting

title: curvetting


text: curvetted

title: curvetted


text:
Pynchonian

Adjective

 * 1) Of or relating to Thomas Pynchon (b. 1937), American novelist.
 * 2) Densely convoluted, verbose and full of allusion.

title: Pynchonian


text:
Talk:critical thinking

critical thinking
Might this be just critical + thinking? --Hekaheka (talk) 13:04, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
 * It has been bureaucratized into courses in secondary schools and possibly higher aimed at those who will be consumers of what is produced by students of rhetoric. Numerous glossaries have it. See . DCDuring TALK 14:40, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia itself has some definitions which are too specific to be SOP:
 * "reasonable reflective thinking focused on deciding what to believe or do"
 * "thinking about thinking"
 * "the intellectually disciplined process of actively and skillfully conceptualizing, applying, analyzing, synthesizing, and/or evaluating information gathered from, or generated by, observation, experience, reflection, reasoning, or communication, as a guide to belief and action"
 * "purposeful, self-regulatory judgment which results in interpretation, analysis, evaluation, and inference, as well as explanation of the evidential, conceptual, methodological, criteriological, or contextual considerations upon which that judgment is based"
 * --WikiTiki89 (talk) 14:48, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Are they definitions or predicates? DCDuring TALK 17:09, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

I'm unsure. I do know one good argument why it isn't a set phrase, though, and that argument can be seen at. --Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 21:24, 23 September 2012 (UTC) RFD passed due to lack of consensus. --Hekaheka (talk) 20:36, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep, as the term has come to mean a very specific form of deep contemplation. bd2412 T 15:30, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
 * But that's not even close to any definition I've seen anywhere and doesn't fit how I've heard it used. Are we missing a sense? DCDuring TALK 17:07, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:critical thinking


text:
unfaired

Adjective

 * 1) Not having been faired.

title: unfaired


text:
㢂

Han character

 * 1) (terrains) of highly strategic importance
 * 2) precipitous (hill, etc.)
 * 3) big mound
 * 4) (same as 㢈) a collapsed house
 * 5) to hit
 * 6) catch

title: 㢂


text:
unworshipped

Adjective

 * 1) Not worshipped.

title: unworshipped


text: legalizarmos

title: legalizarmos


text: legalizardes

title: legalizardes


text: legalizarem

title: legalizarem


text: legalizados

title: legalizados


text: legalizada

title: legalizada


text: legalizadas

title: legalizadas


text: legalizais

title: legalizais


text: legalizam

title: legalizam


text: legalizava

title: legalizava


text: legalizavas

title: legalizavas


text: legalizávamos

title: legalizávamos


text: legalizáveis

title: legalizáveis


text: legalizavam

title: legalizavam


text: legalizei

title: legalizei


text: legalizou

title: legalizou


text: legalizámos

title: legalizámos


text: legalizastes

title: legalizastes


text: legalizaram

title: legalizaram


text: legalizáreis

title: legalizáreis


text: legalizarei

title: legalizarei


text: legalizarão

title: legalizarão


text: legalizaria

title: legalizaria


text: legalizarias

title: legalizarias


text: legalizaríeis

title: legalizaríeis


text: legalizariam

title: legalizariam


text: legalizemos

title: legalizemos


text: legalizeis

title: legalizeis


text: legalizem

title: legalizem


text: legalizasse

title: legalizasse


text: legalizasses

title: legalizasses


text: legalizássemos

title: legalizássemos


text: legalizásseis

title: legalizásseis


text: legalizassem

title: legalizassem


text: legalizai

title: legalizai


text:
legatário

Noun

 * 1) legatee

title: legatário


text:
legitimação

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) legitimacy

title: legitimação


text:
lesar

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) a reader

Etymology
Derived from +.

Verb

 * 1)  to prejudice; to damage
 * 2)  to injure; to hurt
 * 3)  to violate
 * 1)  to violate
 * 1)  to violate

title: lesar


text: lesares

title: lesares


text: lesarmos

title: lesarmos


text: lesardes

title: lesardes


text: lesarem

title: lesarem


text: lesando

title: lesando


text:
lesado

Adjective

 * 1) injured
 * 2)  aggrieved, wronged
 * 3)  loser, daft, stupid
 * 1)  loser, daft, stupid
 * 1)  loser, daft, stupid

title: lesado


text: lesados

title: lesados


text: lesada

title: lesada


text: lesadas

title: lesadas


text: lesas

title: lesas


text: lesamos

title: lesamos


text: lesais

title: lesais


text: lesam

title: lesam


text: lesava

title: lesava


text: lesavas

title: lesavas


text: lesávamos

title: lesávamos


text: lesáveis

title: lesáveis


text: lesavam

title: lesavam


text: lesei

title: lesei


text: lesaste

title: lesaste


text: lesou

title: lesou


text: lesámos

title: lesámos


text: lesastes

title: lesastes


text: lesaram

title: lesaram


text: lesara

title: lesara


text: lesaras

title: lesaras


text: lesáramos

title: lesáramos


text: lesáreis

title: lesáreis


text: lesarei

title: lesarei


text: lesarás

title: lesarás


text: lesará

title: lesará


text: lesaremos

title: lesaremos


text: lesareis

title: lesareis


text: lesarão

title: lesarão


text: lesaria

title: lesaria


text: lesarias

title: lesarias


text: lesaríamos

title: lesaríamos


text: lesaríeis

title: lesaríeis


text: lesariam

title: lesariam


text: lesemos

title: lesemos


text: leseis

title: leseis


text: lesem

title: lesem


text: lesasse

title: lesasse


text: lesasses

title: lesasses


text: lesássemos

title: lesássemos


text: lesásseis

title: lesásseis


text: lesassem

title: lesassem


text: lesai

title: lesai


text: liberais

title: liberais


text:
paybook

Noun

 * 1) A booklet listing payments.

title: paybook


text: paybooks

title: paybooks


text:
Talk:cut through

cut through
In both of the "idiomatic" senses given, cut just means to take a shortcut and through is just a preposition indicating the location of the shortcut. You can also say cut a corner, cut over a bridge, cut under the fence, cut behind a building, cut around a crowd, etc. And the third sense is just a little bit more figurative. --WikiTiki89 (talk) 11:14, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, note it was created by a sockpuppet of the banned user Wonderfool, who's well known for adding self-evident verb + preposition senses. Of course who created isn't relevant, the point is all the definitions are really the word cut followed by the word through, where cut and through retain their usual meanings. Mglovesfun (talk) 11:36, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

deleted -- Liliana • 16:34, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

title: Talk:cut through


text: Wiktionary:Foreign Word of the Day/2013/April 28


text:
Semi-Arian

Noun

 * 1) A member of the Semi-Arianism movement.

Adjective

 * 1) Of or relating to the Semi-Arianism movement.

title: Semi-Arian


text: Semi-Arians

title: Semi-Arians


text:
tree tent

Noun

 * 1) A camping tent that is designed to be used above the ground and is usually attached to or supported by the neighbouring trees.

title: tree tent


text:
Talk:geardagum

geardagum
rfd-sense: The adverb sense is SOP or just incorrect depending on how you look at it (at least according to the citation given):

 * 1)  In days of yore; formerly.
 * We Gar-Dena in geardagum, þeodcyninga þrym gefrunon, ... — Beowulf

Clearly in geardagum is what means in days of yore and not just geardagum. in geardagum is clearly SOP.

--WikiTiki89 (talk) 08:58, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. A preposition + noun is a prepositional phrase, which may have an adverbial meaning, but isn't an adverb. —Angr 09:23, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Tend to agree, though I don't speak Old English. Mglovesfun (talk) 09:39, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, on the face of it. I'd be interested to know what had in mind when he added this though. Ƿidsiþ 16:13, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Geardagum by itself is the dative plural of a noun, it's only in geardagum that is adverbial in any sense. Although that may be SoP. 13:28, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Evaluate, This particular example using the preposition is probably not the best. geardagum can be used adverbially without a preposition (e.g. Hie gesetton ðá Sennar geárdagum - then they occupied Shinar in days of old). I will have to brush up on it, but I believe that OE dative nouns could be used adverbially (compare mǣlum, hwīlum, etc.). Leasnam (talk) 15:26, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, dative nouns can be used without a preposition, but that's just a usage of the dative case. It doesn't turn the nouns into adverbs. Just like in Romani ite domum ("Romans go home") is still the accusative of a noun, not an adverb. —Angr 15:35, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Ah, I see what you're getting at. This is just a function of the dative though, I don't think it needs a separate POS section for every noun. Ƿidsiþ 16:08, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

 * Oh yes, I remember this. Other Germanic languages do similar things with their noun cases. But still, is this adverbial meaning of geardagum predictable from the fact that it is a dative? 15:52, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
 * This is more than just using a dative noun sans preposition. It is a special case of a common adverbial phrase created by what was originally the dative plural of a noun in OE usage. Do we not have such in New English (e.g. at once:, at random:, by heart:, needs:, days:, nights:, weekends:, etc.)? Leasnam (talk) 16:24, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Or, for that matter, at home, where at least a few of the senses don't seem to introduce meaning not found in the noun. DCDuring TALK 16:47, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
 * "At once", "at random", and "by heart" are all prepositional phrases, and "needs" is not synchronically a case-form of "need". But "geardagum" is just the dative plural of "geardæg" and the fact that it can be used without a preposition doesn't make it an adverb. —Angr 16:48, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
 * With all due respect, I see it two ways: 1). geardagum is the dative plural of geardæg. 2). it is an adverb meaning "formerly, in times past", dictated by usage, irrespective of formation. Leasnam (talk) 16:55, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
 * But all datives can be read that way – that's why it's called the ‘adverbial dative’. When Alfred is talking about translation, he says it's done hwilum word be word, hwilum andgit of andgit ‘sometimes word for word, sometimes sense for sense’, where hwilum: is just the dative form of ‘while’. In Riddle 26, there is the line about being þy hyge bliþran, ferþe þy frodran ‘happier in mind and wiser in spirit’, where hyge: and ferþe: have adverbial effect. That's just one of the things the dative does. Ƿidsiþ 17:21, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
 * True, and were there entries for hyge: and ferþe: I would probably add an Adverb PoS to it, lol. Does everyone know that the dative (instrumental) case can be used adverbially? I'm not sure, which is why we list these out as PoS. It's an either-way situation, I know. Have we ever come to this before? Leasnam (talk) 17:53, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
 * What is the evidence that "usage dictates" that? What is the evidence that geardagum is an adverb rather than just a (sometimes prepositionless) dative plural noun? —Angr 17:20, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't see why "New English" is relevant. The question here is whether geardagum had a meaning beyond that of what you expect from the dative case of a noun. i.e. were there any coordinate nouns that had coordinate meanings in the dative case? What makes this a special case? --WikiTiki89 (talk) 17:02, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
 * New (Modern) English is relevant because the comparison is analogous. If we include days: and nights: where PoS = Adverb, then OE should get the same treatment. But yes, there are other dative nouns which act as Adverbs, two of which I have listed above. I wouldn't say that all dative nouns were used in this fashion, which makes geardagum a special case. Leasnam (talk) 17:17, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Since Modern English doesn't inflect for case, it isn't analogous. Latin is analogous, and geardagum is no more an adverb than gladio in a sentence like "Vir gladio interfectus est" is one. —Angr 17:20, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Well...again, we might see things differently. I see English as having one case: possessive/genitive (as I do not see 's as a clitic, but as a genitive marker and clitic). Leasnam (talk) 17:31, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Even if English does have genitives, the forms days, nights, and weekends aren't genitive singulars, so they're still not parallel to the OE case. —Angr 17:54, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, actually in fact they are. Although they may look like plurals to the modern speaker, their origin is in fact from the OE genitive (nihtes, a feminine noun, was formed by analogy to dæges). Leasnam (talk) 18:05, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, if we don't do this for Latin, then I supposed maybe we should. Otherwise, I just see it as a handicap to the one looking up the word whose only take-away is knowing that geardagum is the dative/instrumental of geardæg when in fact it is so much more--a more that wouldn't be revealed unless he/she made indept study into the workings of the OE language. Leasnam (talk) 17:58, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
 * But it isn't more. It's nothing more. And no one would be looking this word up in the first place unless they were studying Old English. —Angr 18:19, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Would a Usage note be in order instead then? Because we cannot escape the fact that geardagum also means "formerly, in days gone by", which is not immediately discernable (--there is no mention at ). So, being the dative of geardagas, does geardagum mean "to [the] olden days" ? (--that's what I think of when I think of dative case). It has a additional meaning which is somewhat specific; somewhat opaque. Leasnam (talk) 18:24, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
 * When you read "Hie gesetton ðá Sennar geárdagum", since you know geardagas means "days of old", what else can geardagum mean other than "in days of old"? Also, we do know that days, nights, etc. are plurals because they are referring to more than one day or night or whatever else. And if you think the possessive is a case rather than a clitic, then explain this: John Smith's house rather than John's Smith's house and John and Jane's house rather than John's and Jane's house and the guy outside's cat rather than the guy's outside cat. Yes, 's: is descended from the case system but it is no longer a case. The only words in Modern English that still have cases are pronouns. --WikiTiki89 (talk) 18:52, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I disagree on all but your first point. "in" can be derived by context, but the sense "formerly", which doesn't refer to any "day" or "days" per se, but simply means "in the past" (any past time) leaves it open. Days/Nights is analogous to needs: = by day/by night; != on days/on nights (plural). This is a misunderstanding. I didn't say 's wasn't a clitic, or didn't have clitic use, it does. But it's also possessive (= case), and case comes first in English (it carries historical precedence). As far as explaining, consider this: John Smith's house = John-Smith's (single unit written as two) house. Also consider this to be a result of how we view nouns, not inflectional endings. Maybe in Modern English we have changed how we use nouns (i.e. groups and multiples interpreted as single units, like "me and Jane" [single unit instead of two individual nouns]) Leasnam (talk) 19:21, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
 * "The guy outside's cat" is a funky example. Let's use "King of England" instead :) the good old "King of England's crown", which can be interpreted to be either "the crown of the King of England" OR "The King of the crown of England". This is a adverse effect caused by how Modern English uses prepositional phrases for nouns, and how we write things, not a change in the way we use 's. We *should* perhaps be writing the first as "the King-of-England's crown" and the second as "the King of England's crown". Written this way it is clear. Even spoken, it is clear because the stress is different. Either way both are genitive. Leasnam (talk) 19:38, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
 * If by "formerly", you mean that geardagum can refer to something more recent than "days of old" then I think I might agree with you to keep it as an adverb. As for the Modern English case system, you might as well also say that English has definite, indefinite, and collective cases:
 * case, singular, plural
 * def.: the-man, the-men
 * indef.: a-man, men
 * col.: man, -
 * And I can go further beyond that, but I think you should get my point. --WikiTiki89 (talk) 20:33, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, honestly though, Modern English has all cases--we just do not show different forms for them. We still have a Nom, Acc, Dat, Gen, Inst, Abl, etc. but the forms (sans Genitive) are the same for each ;) Leasnam (talk) 19:53, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I would actually agree with that. We have all the cases just they have all grown to sound the same and be written the same, same goes with conjugations. But the genitive has evolved into the more generally applicable possessive particle 's:. --WikiTiki89 (talk) 08:25, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

deleted -- Liliana • 20:00, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

title: Talk:geardagum


text:
smth

Usage notes
Sometimes used as a variation of in certain dictionaries, especially foreign-language dictionaries (largely Russian). Due to its exposure to non-native English learners, this has led to a predominance of its usage as Internet slang among non-native speakers of English, especially from the former Soviet Union.

title: smth


text: SMTH

title: SMTH


text: tree tents

title: tree tents


text:
doctor shopping

Noun

 * 1)  The illegal practice of a patient requesting treatment from multiple physicians in order to obtain prescription drugs, either to feed an addiction or resell them.

title: doctor shopping


text: rummagings

title: rummagings


text:
Category:Form-of templates

List of templates
The following is a complete list (as of October 6, 2020) of the non-language-specific templates and their individual behaviors.

The meanings of the columns are as follows:

 * 1) "Category" is the category, if any, that the page is placed into, where   is substituted with the language name.
 * 2) "Takes inflection tags" means that the template takes inflection tags similarly to.
 * 3) "Initial capital" means that the first letter displayed is normally capitalized. This can be changed using 1.
 * 4) "Final period" means that a final period (full stop) is normally displayed after the link. This can be suppressed using 1, or changed using dot to specify a different character.
 * 5) "Supports from, from2, ..." means that the parameters from, from2, etc. are supported to specify regional context labels that customize the text displayed before the link.
 * 6) "Supports POS" means that the parameter POS is supported to customize the categorization into which the page is placed.

Customization
In an entry's definition line, a Form-of template states that the entry's word is a particular form of a lemma entry's word, such as its plural or even a misspelling.

Users can customize how these templates' text displays using their account- or browser-level preferences by either selecting the appropriate preference from PREFS or by adding styles to Special:Mypage/monobook.css as described in CUSTOM. Here are examples of the latter method:

 * To see italicized qualifiers in “form-of” definitions such as:
 * Form of word.
 * Add:

 * To see italicized lemmas in “form-of” definitions such as:
 * Form of word.
 * Add:

title: Category:Form-of templates


text:
toss a coin

Verb

 * 1) To flick a coin into the air, making it spin, in order to use the resultant upturned side (“heads or tails”) for making a decision.

Translations

 * Arabic: قَذَفَ العُمْلَةَ, رَمَى بِالعُمْلَةِ, قَذَفَ النُقُودَ, رَمَى بِالنُقُودِ
 * Czech:
 * Danish:
 * Finnish: heittää kolikkoa
 * German: eine Münze werfen
 * Icelandic: kasta peningi, kasta pening, kasta upp peningi, kasta upp pening
 * Italian: lanciare una moneta
 * Kazakh:
 * Persian: سکه (بالا) افکندن
 * Polish: rzucić monetą / rzucać monetą
 * Russian: подбро́сить моне́ту / подбра́сывать моне́ту
 * Serbo-Croatian:
 * Slovak:
 * Slovene:
 * Spanish: lanzar una moneda
 * Swedish: singla slant
 * Turkish:

title: toss a coin


text: sloppen

title: sloppen


text: canceliers

title: canceliers


text:
Talk:control group

control group
SOP: +. Compare. - -sche (discuss) 19:50, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

 * My impression is that this sense of "control" is restricted to two contexts — (1) science; (2) the phrase "control group" — where context #2 is not a subset of context #1. If I'm right about that, then I think this probably is worth including, as it's essentially non-SOP outside of scientific contexts. —Ruakh TALK 20:13, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

 * Keep: Too many definitions of control for it to be clear. If you're going to delete something, delete the definition for "control", which isn't really used without "group" anyway  Purplebackpack89  (Notes Taken) (Locker) 20:23, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

 * Certainly is used alone. "Sample A was a control." Equinox ◑ 20:42, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

 * ...which is a corruption of "Sample A was in the control group" Purplebackpack89  (Notes Taken) (Locker) 02:59, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
 * If we include common misspellings (& we do), then we certainly include commonly used derived forms, so the definition certainly shouldn't go from control. I am also convinced by Ruakh's argument - coming across "control group" for the first time, I would probably assume "a group that controls," rather than "a group in which variables are controlled for." There is no problem with having information connected with this idea at both pages - A little redundancy is not the end of the world. keep Furius (talk) 05:07, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

 * (after edit confict) Quite often experiments don't involve groups, so it's quite commonplace to say "we left this one alone as the control". The term "control group" comes from "control", not the other way around (see Scientific control). Besides which, "corruption" is just another way of saying "it's different, and I like it better the other way" Its use is usually a good indicator of subjective value judgments. It doesn't matter where this sense of "control" came from (aside from typos and scannos, of course), it's in use- by itself. That means it merits a definition. Chuck Entz (talk) 05:14, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

 * Here is an odd situation. There are a CFI-worthy number of Google Books hits for controlgroup, but the term has a different meaning - something to do with the arrangement of buttons on cell phones. Does WT:COALMINE apply where removing the space changes the meaning of the phrase even while the unspaced version maintains its character is a compound word? bd2412 T 15:46, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I would say no. --WikiTiki89 (talk) 16:04, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Only if the CFI accepts jQuery to be a language. Spinning Spark  17:02, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
 * There are some uses of the term in running text, as opposed to transcriptions of code. However, these are still references to the code itself. bd2412 T 18:22, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Coalmine is ambiguous on this point because it might imply but does not explicitly state that the term be compared to "a single word spelling"  of that term . One of the two arguments it cites does not apply, since the single word is not an alternative spelling, but the point about search does apply. Since the broader interpretation would require sum-of-parts terms for words in a different language (!), I prefer the narrow interpretation and judgement on a case-by-case basis, where certainly claims in the spirit of WT:COALMINE are still legitimate. DAVilla 05:38, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep, irrespective of the WT:COALMINE question. The phrase requires an unintuitive sense of "control" relative to the group at issue. bd2412 T 21:56, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
 * But the purpose of a dictionary is to include words and meaning of word not known intuitively. There are vast numbers phrases and, yea, clauses and sentences that use unintuitive (secondary, specialized) senses of words. Delete to offset that vote, though I a truly undecided. DCDuring TALK 20:26, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
 * To whom do you propose the meaning of control group is known intuitively? bd2412 T 03:08, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

kept -- Liliana • 06:00, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

title: Talk:control group


text:
heads or harps

Etymology
From Irish coins having a harp on the obverse.

Noun

 * 1)  heads or tails

title: heads or harps


text: slopje

title: slopje


text:
sloppenwijk

Etymology
From.

title: sloppenwijk


text: disworshipping

title: disworshipping


text: disworshipped

title: disworshipped


text: ridottos

title: ridottos


text: Wiktionary:Foreign Word of the Day/2013/April 29


text:
Thesaurus:erect penis

Synonyms
,

title: Thesaurus:erect penis


text: conscriptions

title: conscriptions


text:
Talk:unfreie Software

unfreie Software
This seems to be German unfree + software to mean "unfree software". Mglovesfun (talk) 10:20, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes. delete SemperBlotto (talk) 10:29, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Having said that, just noticed we have free software. So, free software is something other than software that's free, it it? Mglovesfun (talk) 10:38, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
 * There's a discussion about on Talk:free software but I would still nominate it. --WikiTiki89 11:09, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

deleted -- Liliana • 16:36, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

title: Talk:unfreie Software


text:
exemptable

Adjective

 * 1) Capable of being exempted.

title: exemptable


text: skimble-scamble

title: skimble-scamble


text:
mom and them

Noun

 * 1)  Family

title: mom and them


text:
поспать

Verb

 * 1) to sleep, to have some sleep

title: поспать


text:
проспать

Verb

 * 1) to oversleep, to sleep in

title: проспать


text:
marooning party

Noun

 * 1)  A social excursion party that sojourns several days on the shore or in some retired place; a prolonged picnic.

title: marooning party


text: marooning parties

title: marooning parties


text:
aramne

Etymology
From, variant of , derived from.

Noun

 * 1) bronze
 * 2) * c1200, Almeric, Fazienda de Ultramar, f. 63r. a.
 * "osp"

- e uj vn om̃e en ſu catar cuemo aramne. e una cuerda de lino en ſue mano e una canna por meſurar.

 * 1) * Idem, f. 66r. a.
 * mas ſu rayz dexa. e ligala con fiero e con aramne en la yerba […]
 * but leave its root, and bind it with iron and bronze to the grass
 * 1) * Idem, ff. 66r. b.-66v. a.
 * e ſus mugieres beuiã el uino e loauan a ſos dios de oro e de plata e de aramne e de fiero e de piedra e de madero.
 * and their wives drank the wine and they worshiped their gods of gold and silver, of bronze, iron, stone and wood.

title: aramne


text: Category:osp:Metals

title: Category:osp:Metals


text: courtezanship

title: courtezanship


text:
rječoslovje

Noun

 * 1)  philology

title: rječoslovje


text:
διάζησις

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) a way of living

Descendants

 * scientific Latin:

title: διάζησις


text: scratting

title: scratting


text: scratted

title: scratted


text:
krugoval

Etymology
+

Noun

 * 1)  radio

title: krugoval


text:
slikopis

Noun

 * 1)  video
 * 2)  film

title: slikopis


text:
Gordian worm

Etymology
Because it sometimes ties itself into a knot; see.

Noun

 * 1) A horsehair worm  that fatally parasitizes insects and crustacea in its larval stage.

Translations

 * Maori: engaio, ngaio

title: Gordian worm


text: Gordian worms

title: Gordian worms


text: fraising

title: fraising


text:
vješč

Adverb

 * 1)  skillful

title: vješč


text: διδαχῆς

title: διδαχῆς


text:
supranaturalist

Noun

 * 1) A supernaturalist.

title: supranaturalist


text: supranaturalists

title: supranaturalists


text:
nine men's morris

Noun

 * 1) An ancient strategic board game for two players, each having nine pieces, and in which forming a row of three of one's own pieces earns the removal of one of the other player's pieces.

Translations

 * Basque: errota-joko
 * Catalan: marro de nou
 * Finnish:
 * German:
 * Hungarian:
 * Icelandic: mylla
 * Italian: ,
 * Norwegian:
 * Bokmål:
 * Nynorsk: mølle
 * Polish:
 * Romanian: ,
 * Turkish:

title: nine men's morris


text:
побегать

Verb

 * 1) to run, to have a run

Usage notes
and are abstract verbs. Their counterparts, and, are concrete verbs.

title: побегать


text: halapeno

title: halapeno


text:
rightsholding

Adjective

 * 1) Holding the legal rights to something.
 * a rightsholding broadcaster

title: rightsholding


text: radicands

title: radicands


text: halapenos

title: halapenos


text: halapenoes

title: halapenoes


text: hospitating

title: hospitating


text: hospitated

title: hospitated


text: jalapeñoes

title: jalapeñoes


text: jalapenoes

title: jalapenoes


text: loricated

title: loricated


text:
illoricated

Etymology
?

Adjective

 * 1)  Not loricated; lacking a hard shell.

title: illoricated


text:
intraterrestrial

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  a  which lives deep underground
 * 2)  any of a race of  beings who live inside the  and operate UFOs

Adjective

 * 1)  Living deep underground.

title: intraterrestrial


text: illogicalnesses

title: illogicalnesses


text: habaneroes

title: habaneroes


text:
habañero

Etymology
Influenced by.

Pronunciation

 * See.

title: habañero


text: habañeros

title: habañeros


text: habañeroes

title: habañeroes


text:
cherry pepper

Etymology
From its cherry-like colour and shape.

Noun

 * 1) the pimento pepper

title: cherry pepper


text: cherry peppers

title: cherry peppers


text: pimientoes

title: pimientoes


text: Citations:to be named later

title: Citations:to be named later


text:
Talk:excuse defense

excuse defense
Not sure if this is for RFV or RFD, so I'm putting it here. This seems like almost a synonym of Nuremberg defense... 02:23, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Although excuse defenses are certainly a real thing in the law, the phrase would be SoP to excuse defense. In criminal law, an "excuse" is merely a reason given why a person who has committed a criminal act should nonetheless be spared punishment for it (e.g. insanity, duress, mistake of fact, etc.). See Excuse (legal). bd2412 T 04:15, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I have now added the appropriate definition to excuse. Cheers! bd2412 T 04:44, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

 * Delete. —Ruakh TALK 17:19, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per BD2412. DCDuring TALK 18:26, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

deleted -- Liliana • 06:02, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

title: Talk:excuse defense


text:
Talk:Mini Cooper

Mini Cooper
Seems no more entryworthy than Renault Clio, VW Beetle, Citroen 106 etc. --Adding quotes (talk) 13:58, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Right: delete. —msh210℠ (talk) 00:53, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

 * I would RFV this for genericized citations with the meaning "any small car". --WikiTiki89 05:36, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * No. It most definitely doesn't mean that. SemperBlotto (talk) 08:10, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * It's worth a shot. I myself use it that way sometimes. --WikiTiki89 09:55, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Unlike Adding quotes' examples above, Mini isn't a company name, so this is more like Focus Zetec (a specific type of Ford Focus, where the word Ford isn't included at all). Mglovesfun (talk) 10:01, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep if generic. DAVilla 13:04, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

deleted. If there is a generic sense here, find citations and then add it. -- Liliana • 11:40, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

title: Talk:Mini Cooper


text: adreças IP

title: adreças IP


text:
Talk:peasant revolt

peasant revolt
First, most obvious sense sounds like what it is: a revolt by peasants. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 06:00, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
 * It doesn't seem to be a set term either: "peasant revolt" gets 65 k hits in a simple Google search, but "peasant rebellion" gets 25k and "peasant uprising" 23k. These three terms also seem to be used interchangeably of same historical events, e.g. peasant revolt/rebellion/uprising of 1525. Btw, also the second sense looks dubious. I'd delete the whole entry. --Hekaheka (talk) 11:14, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I also doubt it's limited to "European history". --WikiTiki89 11:51, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not sure about the second sense, would welcome citations to try and see how it's used. Mglovesfun (talk) 12:18, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Wouldn't the second definition be covered by definition 2 of peasant? Furius (talk) 19:32, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

 * Delete. Obvious SoP. ---> Tooironic (talk) 00:28, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
 * See List_of_rebellions_in_China for an example of a peasant rebellion that occurred outside of the European peninsula. --BB12 (talk) 22:20, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

 * Delete. —Ruakh TALK 18:01, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. DCDuring TALK 18:39, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Rfd failed - deleted disputed sense. Note that the second sense is still under discussion. --Hekaheka (talk) 22:44, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

peasant revolt — Sense 2
This is the sense of "any agricultural workers" revolting, using sense 2 of peasant:, as noted above by Furius. I think it is just as deserving of deletion, but I'm adding it separately because I'm posting it so much later than the first sense. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 18:34, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

 * Delete. —Ruakh TALK 18:01, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. DCDuring TALK 18:39, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

deleted -- Liliana • 18:55, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

I saw this and was going to add a translation to the entry, but it had already been deleted. Where should I put the translations instead? 19:06, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

title: Talk:peasant revolt


text:
nijesam

Etymology
From +, first-person singular present tense form of. This formation later created *ne jesьmь in the South Slavic vernaculars, which merged to become něsьmь (attested in 1406). The term něsьmь eventually formed něsamь. Because of the yat reflex, něsamь became rendered as nijesam in Ijekavian speeches.

Verb

 * 1)  negative

 * 1)  negative

title: nijesam


text:
nesam

Etymology
From +, first-person singular present tense form of. This formation later created *ne jesьmь in the South Slavic vernaculars, which merged to become něsьmь (attested in 1406). The term něsьmь eventually formed něsamь. Because of the yat reflex, něsamь became rendered as nesam in Ekavian speeches.

Verb

 * 1)  negative

title: nesam


text:
težanje

Noun

 * 1)  cultivation

title: težanje


text:
težitba

Noun

 * 1)  culture

title: težitba


text:
Talk:Hound of the Baskervilles

Hound of the Baskervilles
"A dog well-known for its fearsome sound." Not dictionary material, is it? Citations page is chaos. And compare deletion of Talk:Clifford the Big Red Dog, another fictional dog with no evidence of generic use given. Equinox ◑ 04:26, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I have to agree, delete. Mglovesfun (talk) 11:53, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Probably not, but we've been surprised before. RFV for generic or metaphorical use such as:
 * "When a divergence of MACD-Histogram fails to produce a reversal, it gives a Hound of the Baskervilles signal."
 * DAVilla 17:00, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Maro 21:03, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

deleted -- Liliana • 11:07, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Also "Hound of the Baskervilles effect". Rich Farmbrough, 18:46, 23 June 2013 (UTC).

Robert Rankin, The Brentford Chainstore Massacre ".. a regular hound of the Baskervilles..." (lower case 'h' shows that it is used as a generic term). Rich Farmbrough, 18:53, 23 June 2013 (UTC).

title: Talk:Hound of the Baskervilles


text:
gnjetao

Noun

 * 1)  pheasant

title: gnjetao


text:
gnjetel

Noun

 * 1)  pheasant

title: gnjetel


text:
belič

Noun

 * 1)  painter

title: belič


text:
gnjeteo

Noun

 * 1)  pheasant

title: gnjeteo


text: prirodoslovje

title: prirodoslovje


text:
gradba

Etymology
Cognates include 🇨🇬

Noun

 * 1)  architecture

title: gradba


text:
to be named later

Etymology
From the common use of the expression in U.S. newspaper reports of trades of professional sports players between teams, especially in baseball.

Phrase

 * 1) Something of very uncertain value.
 * 2) Something of very low value.
 * 1) Something of very low value.

Derived terms

 * (player to be named later)

title: to be named later


text:
hurija

Etymology
From (Turkish ), from, from.

Noun

 * 1)  houri

Noun

 * 1) houri

title: hurija


text:
хурија

Etymology
(Turkish ), from, from.

Noun

 * 1) houri

Etymology
From (Turkish ), from, from.

Noun

 * 1)  houri

title: хурија


text:
Talk:mobile app

mobile app
Yet another SoP from guess-who. SemperBlotto (talk) 09:27, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Also mobile application and plurals of both. SemperBlotto (talk) 09:29, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, should be covered at app and application (and already is). Mglovesfun (talk) 11:54, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, it's the device that's mobile, not the application, but the definition at app should make that clear. Weak delete mobile app, abstain on mobile application. Is mobile an adjective? DAVilla 17:10, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

deleted -- Liliana • 11:03, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

title: Talk:mobile app


text:
Citations:creepmouse

Adjective: "(mildly pejorative) timid and unassuming in the extreme"

 * 1765, Anonymous, The History of Little Goody Two-Shoes, Houlston and Son (c. 1825-1838?), page 34:
 * Soon after, the tempest drove in four thieves, who not seeing such a little creep-mouse girl as Two-Shoes, lay down on the hay next to her, and began to talk over their exploits, and to settle plans for future robberies.
 * 1814, Jane Austen, Mansfield Park, Chapter XV:
 * "Indeed but you must, for we cannot excuse you. It need not frighten you; it is a nothing of a part, a mere nothing, not above half a dozen speeches altogether, and it will not much signify if nobody hears a word you say, so you may be as creepmouse as you like, but we must have you to look at."
 * 1860, Ralph Waldo Emerson, The Conduct of Life, Ticknor and Fields (1860), page 160:
 * Here is Elise, who caught cold in coming into the world, and has always increased it since. Here are creep-mouse manners; and thievish manners.
 * 1985, Jean Ure, After Thursday, Delacorte Press (1985), ISBN 9780385295482, page 161:
 * Abe had been enjoying himself, without so much as a thought in his head as to how she was getting on; why shouldn't she have her turn? She was sick of being boring and creepmouse. While the cat was away the mice deserved to play — at least they did if that was how the cat was going to behave.
 * 1990, John McAleer, "Satirizing The Academy", Chicago Tribune, 18 November 1990:
 * A box of manuscripts, buried with Ash by Ellen, his creepmouse widow, is opened; the lovers' final secrets are revealed. Ellen, we find, had never let Ash consummate their marriage.

Noun: "(mildly pejorative) an extremely timid and unassuming person"

 * 1831, Catherine Gore, Mothers and Daughters, Volume II, E. L. Carey & A. Hart/Allen & Ticknor (1834), page 62:
 * "Pho! pho ! — I do not believe a word of it. Lord Basingstoke is one of those shy young men who are very much attached to any one who will take the trouble of making love to them ; — one of those creepmice who run away with their mother's waiting-maid, or marry an actress for want of courage and patience to encounter the formalities of an honourable courtship.
 * 1907, Florence Hayllar, Nepenthes, William Blackwood and Sons (1907), page 5:
 * The knocking was repeated, — a very gentle knocking, which seemed to argue that the devil was in a polite and patient mood. I felt a little creepmouse myself as I heard it, but I got up, and leaving the quaking woman in the parlour, I went and opened the door.
 * 1995, Mary C. Sullivan, Catherin McAuley and the Tradition of Mercy, University of Notre Dame Press (1995), ISBN 9780268008116, page 39:
 * Catherine McAuley once mildly complained that the new foundation in Birr should have been made from nearby Tullamore, noting that "it is quite a shame to be such creepmouses in such a cause" (272). However, Catherine did not live long enough to see Tullamore catch fire in this respect.
 * 2004, William Deresiewicz, Jane Austen and the Romantic Poets, Columbia University Press (2004), ISBN 0231134142, pages 44-45:
 * Fanny and Anne experience no sudden recognition-cum-transformation— not, like Elinor, because they have nothing to reform, but because, like Wordsworth and Coleridge in their first-person lyrics, they practice a continual reappraisal of feeling and experience and are thus continually changing. Emma is not quite so heroic as these two creepmice, but her transformation is every bit as profound.
 * 2009, Laurie Viera Rigler, Rude Awakenings of a Jane Austen Addict, Dutton (2009), ISBN 9780525950769, page 6:
 * Don't be such a frightened little creepmouse. I take a deep breath, look at the feet again, and giggle.
 * 2011, Barbara Hardy, "Twilight in Mansfield Parsonage", in Dorothea's Daughter and Other Nineteenth-Century Postscripts, Victorian Secrets Limited (2011), ISBN 9781906469245, page 29:
 * I was always too timid, too shy, a creepmouse as dear Tom once called me.

title: Citations:creepmouse


text:
Talk:temperature

temperature
RFV sense 7: Body temperature noted as: cool, cold, warm, or hot as part of the skin signs assessment.

This is just temperature (sense 3), measured in one specific way. It even uses temperature in its own definition. Smurrayinchester (talk) 22:58, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Part of it, the sense of an elevated body temperature, is already covered at sense #4. SemperBlotto (talk) 09:37, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

deleted -- Liliana • 06:08, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

title: Talk:temperature


text:
Talk:right to keep and bear arms

right to keep and bear arms
SOP? - -sche (discuss) 23:20, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Believe it or not I wouldn't have nominated this one, it does say "the right of an individual" as it doesn't apply to organizations. But LOL at the previous definition "declare war if necessary". Would love to see an individual US citizen declare war legally. Mglovesfun (talk) 23:44, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Ha ha. Don't give the right-wing talk radio pundits ideas! ~ Röbin Liönheart (talk) 23:50, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
 * \begin{lwc}Keep because you can’t know if it’s the right to wield weapons, or if it’s the right to own upper limbs of ursids.\end{lwc} Delete. This is a dictionary, not the Encyclopaedia of the American Constitution. — Ungoliant (Falai) 00:02, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I would keep this one as a set phrase, since you can't correctly say "right to bear and keep arms". By the way, the U.S. Constitution only speaks of a "right to bear arms"; the "keep and bear" phrasing comes from various state constitutions, and is the language generally used by gun rights advocates. bd2412 T 02:10, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, there are limited hits for "right to bear and keep arms" on Google Books. Is this entry really a fixed phrase? People often just say "right to bear arms" instead. ---> Tooironic (talk) 03:56, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
 * My mistake, "keep and bear" is in the Constitution. bd2412 T 21:36, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Actually, it is fixed because "keep and bear guns" (which is what the right is actually about) is unsupported. It gets only four Google Books hits, only two of which use the phrase as a phrase. See Mark V. Tushnet, Out of Range: Why the Constitution Can't End the Battle Over Guns (2007), p. 32: "Perhaps the modern technology of oppression has made the Second Amendment obsolete were it taken to protect only the right to keep and bear guns and rifles, and ridiculous were it taken to protect the right to keep and bear bazookas. The guns/arms dichotomy is what makes this idiomatic. bd2412 T 17:59, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

 * Delete per Ungoliant. Equinox ◑ 22:39, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep as an anachronism like once upon a time and much ado about nothing. DAVilla 10:31, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
 * In retrospect, gun control and arms control mean two different things, but the right to "bear arms" relates to guns, not "arms" as used in the latter phrase. bd2412 T 22:29, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I think that the meaning of this term as it is normally used in US political discussions is somewhat anachronistic and circumscribed. Specifically, the word arms is, I believe, limited to individually operated small arms. But it apparently does not necessarily include fully automatic weapons or weapons with magazines exceed a certain size. And bear does not mean the normal sense of "carry" as there is no US Constitutional "right" to carry a concealed weapon.
 * Keep. The term clearly has a legal meaning in the US that is defined in legislature and courts that is not directly deducible from meanings, legal or other, of the constituent terms. DCDuring TALK 17:06, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
 * SOP, delete per Ungoliant. —msh210℠ (talk) 17:46, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. Arms, by definition, can include weapons of mass destruction, but the "right to keep and bear arms" doesn't allow American citizens to legally own and deploy a nuclear missile. The use of arms here is restrictive. Astral (talk) 07:15, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Kept as no consensus. —msh210℠ (talk) 02:12, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

title: Talk:right to keep and bear arms


text:
Talk:Victoria

Victoria
Rfd-redundant, sense: A monarch named Queen Victoria, especially Queen Victoria of the United Kingdom (reigned 1837-1901).

Although she was a remarkable personage of great importance to the history of the United Kingdom, the Commonwealth and, indeed, the world, all of that strikes me as encyclopedic rather than lexicographic information. In reality it's just a special case of the given name sense. This same formulation can be applied to any person referred to by their title who has ever been the subject of discussion in CFI-worthy publications. Aside from all the Kings, Queens, Tsars, Kaisers, Emperors, Dukes, Duchesses, Lords, Ladies, etc, what's to keep this being used for Popes, Presidents, Governors, Senators, Mayors, etc? Chuck Entz (talk) 03:25, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

 * I would keep it and improve it. Surely, there are very very many texts that use the term Victoria: to mean the British queen. Move to RfV and I'll add a few. SemperBlotto (talk) 07:58, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
 * But all those texts are (also) just using the general sense, "(someone with) a female given name which is Latin for victory". Assuming you don't want to have a separate sense for every distinct Victoria who's been mentioned 3+ times in literature (or do you?), what objective line would you draw to keep [[Victoria]] and [[George]] from being Wikipedia disambiguation pages with 100+ senses? And should we have senses for every Uni that's ever been referred to as simply "Uni"? "I go back to Uni in a few weeks..." - -sche (discuss) 10:03, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I'd think it would have to be cited as just Victoria, not Queen Victoria, although the latter is more certainly an appropriate page title. Personally, I would want to see metaphorical use, such as:
 * "the powerful empress dowager Cixi, the Queen Victoria of nineteenth-century China"
 * except, again, without the royal title. I'm not saying it should be kept, but it's something that's potentially keepable, in my opinion. DAVilla 06:27, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. - -sche (discuss) 10:03, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, I can understand that lots of texts use Victoria specifically to mean Victoria of the United Kingdom, but what about other Victorias that are still used in enough texts to be citable per WT:CFI? Mglovesfun (talk) 23:00, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Why are the various places named after Victoria worthy of inclusion (including some which are quite obscure to English speakers), but not the monarch that they're named after? Furius (talk) 10:10, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Are all of the places named after Victoria worthy of and entitled to inclusion? Not necessarily. Look at Paris, where Davilla reduced all of the minor towns to "Any place named after the French city." Look at West Point ("any of several towns..."), Abbeville ("any of several towns..."), Fulton ("any of several towns..."), etc. - -sche (discuss) 19:59, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Now, should we expand "Victoria" and "George" to say "a given name, or any of the people who have this name"? Yes, because when people say "George", they mean "person named George", not "a name", just like "shirt" doesn't mean "a word [for clothing]", it is a word; it means "clothing for the upper body". - -sche (discuss) 20:10, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Most of the place names should definitely be merged into "Any of several places...". Delete "Any monarch named Victoria", but I'll Abstain on separate definition for British Queen Victoria. She's the only notable monarch of that name and has no numeral. Also she's the origin of many of the place names. --Makaokalani (talk) 15:56, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

deleted -- Liliana • 15:57, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

title: Talk:Victoria


text:
ܐܡܒܪ

Etymology 1
From ; compare 🇨🇬, from which the alternative Syriac forms and  are derived.

Noun

 * 1) amber
 * 2) ambergris

title: ܐܡܒܪ


text:
creepmouse

Etymology
, from a likening of a person's character and/or behaviour to that of a small, timorous, and often unseen rodent.

Adjective

 * 1)  Timid and unassuming in the extreme.

Noun

 * 1)  An extremely timid and unassuming person.
 * 2) * 1831, Catherine Gore, Mothers and Daughters, Volume II, E. L. Carey & A. Hart/Allen & Ticknor (1834), page 62:
 * "Pho! pho ! — I do not believe a word of it. Lord Basingstoke is one of those shy young men who are very much attached to any one who will take the trouble of making love to them ; — one of those creepmice who run away with their mother's waiting-maid, or marry an actress for want of courage and patience to encounter the formalities of an honourable courtship.

title: creepmouse


text: creepmice

title: creepmice


text: ܥܡܒܪ

title: ܥܡܒܪ


text: ܥܢܒܪ

title: ܥܢܒܪ


text:
Talk:rot in jail

rot in jail
"Expression of anger directed at someone who has been arrested, especially after that individual had committed a particularly heinous crime." Not really a proper definition. The definition would be "to languish in jail without being released". If anything, that is a sense at, since we also see e.g. "rot behind bars". Equinox ◑ 20:04, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. SOP. Also, "rot in prison", "rot in hell", "rot in limbo. bd2412 T 20:36, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete, but rot could have a dedicated sense. It’s not expected that the target of these expressions literally decay in jail/hell/limbo, is it? — Ungoliant (Falai) 20:45, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Agreed. A definition should be added to rot. Something like "To stay in a place under miserable circumstances for a long time." --BB12 (talk) 04:37, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
 * This could be argued about (does someone who says "burn in Hell" expect the person to catch fire?) but yes, I think we are missing a sense at rot. Equinox ◑ 04:41, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Hell is considered to be fiery place, so I’d say they are using the literal sense of burn. — Ungoliant (Falai) 05:15, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Very delete. Mglovesfun (talk) 10:39, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete There is something idiomatic about many common collocations, probably those that would have high mutual information scores. Consider clap in jail, languish in jail, stew in jail, and land in jail. These are not the most commonly used verbs with in jail, but are, after rot in jail the most likely collocations that seem somewhat idiomatic. They are nevertheless transparent. DCDuring TALK 14:14, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

deleted -- Liliana • 07:53, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

title: Talk:rot in jail


text:
διθυμία

Etymology
From, from +.

Noun

 * 1) dissension

title: διθυμία


text:
Talk:quieuit

quieuit
WT:ALA says to use 'v' for the consonant form (representing ) and 'u' for the vowel for (representing ). Therefore we should delete this. However this may contradict WT:CFI as this spelling may be attested. Mglovesfun (talk) 14:09, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. It doesn’t contradict the CFI, thanks to the WT:CFI section. — Ungoliant (Falai) 15:34, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. The varieties of Latin that would have this spelling consider u and v as the same letter, so this is more analogous the choice between different apostrophe and hyphen characters. Although it would make it easier to search for that variant, it would open the door to a v-only form and a u-only form for all Latin entries containing v or u, and the current mixed-u/v-form would make three forms for all of those entries. Multiply that by the number of inflected forms, and we're talking lots of redundant entries (and then there would be the same for i/j). Chuck Entz (talk) 16:25, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Assuming soft redirects to a canonical spelling specified at ALA, I don't see the problem with that, at all. But per our current policy, yeah, delete. —msh210℠ (talk) 22:46, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

deleted -- Liliana • 07:45, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

title: Talk:quieuit


text: δικαιοσύνην

title: δικαιοσύνην


text:
Talk:juvenile party

juvenile party
"A party attended by juveniles, frequently where beer and other alcoholic beverages are illegally consumed". If the definition is accurate, it seems clear SoP. Mglovesfun (talk) 14:26, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not hits for juvenileparty. There might be a specific legal definition somewhere. — Ungoliant (Falai) 15:43, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

deleted -- Liliana • 07:48, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

title: Talk:juvenile party


text:
Talk:play-by-play announcer

play-by-play announcer
[[play-by-play]] [[announcer]]. Mglovesfun (talk) 14:35, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete, SOP. — Ungoliant (Falai) 18:15, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

deleted -- Liliana • 07:48, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

title: Talk:play-by-play announcer


text:
eaten bread is soon forgotten

Proverb

 * 1)  Kind deeds or favours are often forgotten by the beneficiary once they have been done.

title: eaten bread is soon forgotten


text:
Talk:just as

just as
= just: + as: => SoP. DCDuring TALK 20:06, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

 * Delete. We also wouldn't require an entry for just like. Equinox ◑ 20:21, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Right, delete both senses. —msh210℠ (talk) 17:04, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. DAVilla 05:06, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

deleted -- Liliana • 11:18, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

title: Talk:just as


text:
ܟܝܦܬܐ

Etymology
From the root related to curving.

Noun

 * 1)  glans penis; clitoris

title: ܟܝܦܬܐ


text:
ܡܕܢܐ

Etymology
. Possibilities include:
 * From.
 * From, from.

Noun

 * 1) wine cellar, storeroom
 * 2)  granary

title: ܡܕܢܐ


text:
eau de rose

Noun

 * 1) rosewater

title: eau de rose


text:
mark-white

Noun

 * 1)  Mark's point; bullseye.

title: mark-white


text:
adawed

Adjective

 * 1)  Daunted, overwhelmed.

title: adawed


text: red rags

title: red rags


text: red rags to a bull

title: red rags to a bull


text: Category:Russian irregular verbs

title: Category:Russian irregular verbs


text:
Talk:zꜣ

Coptic descendants
I have no idea about the Coptic, I just copied it from sA. If the * of *ZIR means an unattested from, then I'm not sure why the word is there... I'll leave it for someone knowledgeable to sort out. Hyarmendacil (talk) 06:20, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

title: Talk:zꜣ


text:
歴訪

Noun

 * 1) a round of visits

Verb

 * 1) make, pay a round of visits

title: 歴訪


text:
liberalidade

Noun

 * 1) liberality
 * 2) generosity, largesse

title: liberalidade


text:
licitação

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) licitation
 * 2) bidding (at an auction)

title: licitação


text: licitarmos

title: licitarmos


text: licitardes

title: licitardes


text: licitarem

title: licitarem


text: licitados

title: licitados


text: licitada

title: licitada


text: licitadas

title: licitadas


text: licitava

title: licitava


text: licitavas

title: licitavas


text: licitávamos

title: licitávamos


text: licitáveis

title: licitáveis


text: licitavam

title: licitavam


text: licitei

title: licitei


text: licitou

title: licitou


text: licitámos

title: licitámos


text: licitastes

title: licitastes


text: licitaram

title: licitaram


text: licitáreis

title: licitáreis


text: licitarei

title: licitarei


text: licitarão

title: licitarão


text: licitaria

title: licitaria


text: licitarias

title: licitarias


text: licitaríeis

title: licitaríeis


text: licitariam

title: licitariam


text:
ligeireza

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) lightness
 * 2) brevity
 * 3) rapidity

title: ligeireza


text: liciteis

title: liciteis


text: licitem

title: licitem


text: licitássemos

title: licitássemos


text: licitásseis

title: licitásseis


text: licitassem

title: licitassem


text: limitações

title: limitações


text: limitarmos

title: limitarmos


text: limitardes

title: limitardes


text: limitavas

title: limitavas


text: limitávamos

title: limitávamos


text: limitáveis

title: limitáveis


text: limitavam

title: limitavam


text: limitei

title: limitei


text:
㢃

Han character

 * 1) high
 * 2) magnanimity

title: 㢃


text: limitou

title: limitou


text: limitámos

title: limitámos


text: limitastes

title: limitastes


text: limitáreis

title: limitáreis


text: limitarei

title: limitarei


text:
Talk:создать

Alternative stress on masculine past - созда́л or со́здал. --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 07:06, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
 * In my sandbox verb module, I made alternative form arguments be true overrides. Currently they're ignored if the conjugation function specifies a value for the alternative form, which seems wrong. It makes a difference for this verb and certain other related verbs. In this case, past_n2 is supplied by the conjugation function "irreg-дать" as создало́, whereas the invocation for this particular verb specifies an argument |past_n2=со́здало, with a different stress pattern, which is ignored because the conjugation function already provides a value. Which of these two stress patterns is correct, or are both correct (that is, in addition to the form созда́ло, the value of the primary form 'past_n')? Benwing2 (talk) 04:23, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
 * BTW a similar issue occurs with отдать, продать, задать and подать. Benwing2 (talk) 04:25, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
 * ruwiki says the override |past_n2=со́здало is correct. Benwing2 (talk) 04:40, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Merry Christmas! Verbs derived from дать are among the odd ones. In the past tense for non-reflexive verbs both stress patterns are acceptable. In the past, only "со́здал", "о́тдал", etc. was the norm for m., n and pl. but these days it's OK to stress the second syllable. For раздать both ро́здал и разда́л are accepted. Pls note the prefix "раз-"/"рас-" changes to "ро́з-"/"ро́с-" when stressed (also with other parts of speech) - it's a cognate of "roz-" in other Slavic languages, it only changed to "raz"- in Russian because of аканье. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 12:42, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Merry Christmas to you too! Although it's going to be 76 degrees today (that's around 25 C), hardly winter weather :) ... It's strange that the spelling раз- is used here when normally аканье isn't reflected in Russian spelling. It looks like раздать needs to have some overrides added for the alternative past tenses and maybe other forms, can you add them when you have a chance? Benwing2 (talk) 13:00, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
 * It's a hot summer in Melbourne. I had a great swim on the beach but was very annoyed by the flies. I know it's strange with the spelling of "раз-"/"рас-"/"ро́з-"/"ро́с-". Russians seem to recall that it was "о" when they have to put a stress on it, as in (but there are words рассы́пать and рассыпа́ть),  (but разы́скивать) but the number of words with "ро́з-"/"ро́с-" is limited. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 13:20, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm in Austin TX. Not much swimming in the winter but it's been very warm, as all across the U.S.... Benwing2 (talk) 23:24, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

 * Is the conjugation, , (pre-reform ), etc., attested in Russian, or only in OCS? If yes, what would the stress be? Is it dated, archaic, obsolete? What about  or ? PUC – 15:42, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
 * It’s сози́ждить, see созиждить for the correct conjugation and stresses. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 20:15, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

title: Talk:создать


text: limitarão

title: limitarão


text: limitarias

title: limitarias


text:
Talk:воссоздать

Alternative stress on masculine past - воссозда́л or воссо́здал. --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 07:06, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

title: Talk:воссоздать


text: limitaríeis

title: limitaríeis


text: limitariam

title: limitariam


text: limítrofes

title: limítrofes


text: limiteis

title: limiteis


text: limitássemos

title: limitássemos


text: limitásseis

title: limitásseis


text:
Talk:дать

Alternative stress on neuter past - да́ло or дало́. --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 07:08, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

title: Talk:дать