text:
Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2012-02/Removing "Vandalism" and "Protologisms" sections of CFI

Removing "Vandalism" and "Protologisms" sections of CFI

 * Voting on: removing the subsections "Vandalism" and "Protologisms" from Criteria for inclusion:
 * Rationale: as discussed in the straw poll, these aren't criteria for inclusion, and thus shouldn't appear on the page; exclusions of such entries are very well handled by the normal attestation criteria.
 * Vote starts: 00:01, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Vote ends: 23.59, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

 * Vote created: Liliana • 17:59, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Discussion:
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] Beer_parlour_archive/2011/March
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] Beer_parlour_archive/2011/March
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] Beer_parlour_archive/2011/October
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2012-02/Removing &

Removing "Vandalism" section — Support

 * 1) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support Liliana • 04:57, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support --Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 05:26, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support Dan Polansky 08:19, 22 February 2012 (UTC) To quote myself from the poll: This does not regulate the inclusion of a term or a sense of a term. Vandalism, which includes replacing the content of a page with "eerwerjhewkrkew" and other sorts of edits, gets removed or reverted without reference to CFI. --Dan Polansky 08:19, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support Mglovesfun (talk) 11:49, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support EncycloPetey 21:25, 22 February 2012 (UTC) (but the text in some form should be transferred to Vandalism)
 * 6) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support --Daniel 21:50, 22 February 2012 (UTC) And I agree with EncycloPetey about Vandalism. --Daniel 21:50, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Is this to your liking? -- Liliana • 22:52, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, it is. But I think it could be even better. I edited it by copying my own words from Beer_parlour_archive/2011/March. --Daniel 22:57, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support. —msh210℠ (talk) 22:01, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support. Belongs elsewhere. DAVilla 03:22, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support. Voted to keep in the straw poll, but changed my mind. Ungoliant MMDCCLXIV 18:11, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support. The only part of this that isn't already implied by the rest of WT:CFI is the statement that no discussion is required in order to delete vandalism. Since we don't, in any case, have any policy requiring discussion before a page is deleted, this statement is unnecessary (and perhaps somewhat misleading, insofar as it implies that there is such a policy). —Ruakh TALK 15:13, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support - -sche (discuss) 03:11, 28 February 2012 (UTC) (per Ruakh)
 * 6) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support —Internoob 03:27, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support —Michael Z. 2012-03-11 21:07 z
 * 8) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support -- Cirt (talk) 07:21, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Removing "Protologisms" section — Support

 * 1) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support Liliana • 04:57, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support Dan Polansky 08:19, 22 February 2012 (UTC) To quote myself from the poll: Protologisms get excluded as unattested, so the attestation section already handles this. The other way around, if something is attested, then it is not a protologism. --Dan Polansky 08:19, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support Mglovesfun (talk) 11:49, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support --Daniel 07:16, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support. I'm not really opposed to having WT:CFI re-emphasize that Wiktionary is for words that are actually used — though IMHO such emphasis is better suited to What Wiktionary is not — but the current text leaves a great deal to be desired, and we're better off without it. —Ruakh TALK 15:21, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support - -sche (discuss) 03:11, 28 February 2012 (UTC) (per Ruakh)
 * 7) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support —Internoob 03:27, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support  If protologisms must be mentioned, then mention them in the appropriate place. But vestigial non-guideline sections are just clutter. —Michael Z. 2012-03-11 21:10 z
 * 9) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support -- Cirt (talk) 07:21, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Removing "Protologisms" section — Oppose

 * 1) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose  --Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 05:29, 22 February 2012 (UTC) I think it's handy to have a bit about protologisms here, which (unlike vandalism) can be mistaken for meeting CFI by uncareful readers.
 * Protologisms are recently coined unattested terms. If a careless reader fails to read at the top of CFI that attestation is required, why should he read down below about protologisms? Or are we supposed to introduce repetitive redundancy into CFI so that careless readers have several occasions to take note of a statement? Furthermore, the text of the section is wrong: we do not require terms to be in wide use, merely attested and idiomatic. In its literal reading, the section on protologisms would override the top of CFI with a new requirement that a term has to be in "wide use" to be included. --Dan Polansky 20:50, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I think that EncycloPetey has answered most of your argument already, and more effectively than I would have, but in answer to the "wide use", perhaps those words ought to be changed (although I can't see how it would make any difference in a real-life situation). I still don't see a reason to delete a functional part of CFI. --Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 05:55, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
 * He has not. Neither you nor EncycloPetey have explained why WT:ATTEST is not sufficient. On "wide use", EncycloPetey has not even acknowledged the problem. The "protologisms" section is not fuctional; it contradicts WT:ATTEST (via "wide use" phrasing), an, to the extent to which it does not contradict WT:ATTEST, it is redundant to it. In sum, it is broken and needless, as I have pointed out. --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:17, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
 * In case you didn't know, we have Protologisms. -- Liliana • 10:21, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
 * This is to me about AGF and salvaging editors. Vandals will never be dedicated contributors; protologism-adders may. Better to be exceedingly clear about it so that they understand. If you have a problem with the wording, that can be a separate vote, which I would probably support. --Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 04:51, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Below, EncycloPetey has admitted that protologisms being added to Wiktionary continues to be a problem. Thus, being "exceedingly clear" (by introducing a redundant section that contradicts WT:ATTEST?) does not prevent addition of protologisms. Neither you nor EncycloPetey have explained why a link to WT:ATTEST posted on the talk page of a person who adds protologisms does not suffice. I don't know where you got the idea that the section on protologisms salvages editors (any evidence?), and that it does so in a way that WT:ATTEST cannot do. --Dan Polansky (talk) 07:40, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose  EncycloPetey 21:26, 22 February 2012 (UTC) This continues to be enough of a problem that expressly pointing it out on one of our two primary policy pages seems justified, and removing it does not. --EncycloPetey 21:26, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * If adding protologisms continues to be a problem now that the section is there, that only proves that the section does not do what its supporters claim: prevent careless users who don't read CFI at all from adding protologisms. --Dan Polansky 21:50, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * You are making a serious assumption error about the purpose in having a policy. Policy never prevents stupidity; it serves as an official explanation or justification to point a miscreant to after the fact. --EncycloPetey 05:55, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Even if the purpose of "protologisms" section were mainly to be referred to after someone enters a protologism, "attestation" section suffices for the purpose: a person who enters a protologism can be referred to WT:ATTEST. And the section on "protologisms" is wrong by its use of "wide use" as a criterion for inclusion, as I have pointed out above in a response to Metaknowledge. --Dan Polansky 07:06, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose per EncycloPetey. Ungoliant MMDCCLXIV 18:28, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Removing "Protologisms" section — Abstain

 * 1) [[Image:Symbol abstain vote.svg|20px]] Abstain < class="latinx" >Ƿidsiþ 13:48, 24 February 2012 (UTC) Whatevs.
 * 2) [[Image:Symbol abstain vote.svg|20px]] Abstain. I don't see any compelling reason to strike this language other than the simultaneous removal of a link to that hideous section. DAVilla 03:21, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
 * So you do see at least one compelling reason to strike this language, right?: "other than the simultaneous removal of a link ...". By "hideous section" I assume that you mean Appendix:List of protologisms, right? Do you see a compelling reason to keep the section? (I say the section is broken and needless AKA redundant to WT:ATTEST.) And if there is no compelling reason to keep the section, should not the section be removed so that the newcomers have as short text to read as possible? ("Perfection is attained, not when no more can be added, but when no more can be removed. --Exupéry."). --Dan Polansky (talk) 11:13, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Well I was leaning towards keep though because it seems relevant. This isn't a vote to eliminate or revise the list of protologisms, which I think should link to citations pages with at least one solid reference for each. DAVilla 16:02, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Decision

 * Removing "Vandalism" section: 14-0-0 (100%)
 * Removing "Protologisms" section: 9-3-2 (75%)

Both passed. --Daniel 11:43, 23 March 2012 (UTC)


text:
spleneticus

Etymology
Late Latin. From.

Adjective

 * 1) affected with spleen; splenetic

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: spleneticus


text:
Stempeluhr

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) time clock, punch clock

title: Stempeluhr


text: Stempeluhren

title: Stempeluhren


text:
fairdom

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) Fairs generally; the realm or sphere of fairs.

title: fairdom


text:
preacquaintance

Noun

 * 1) Previous acquaintance or knowledge.

title: preacquaintance


text:
misbefitting

Adjective

 * 1)  Not befitting; unfit or unsuitable

title: misbefitting


text:
plasă

Etymology
, from.

Noun

 * 1) net (such as for fishing)
 * 2) mesh, wire netting
 * 3) bag or other object made of such material
 * 1) bag or other object made of such material

Noun

 * 1) an administrative subdivision of a  (county)

title: plasă


text:
fileu

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) net

title: fileu


text:
împletitură

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) knitting, knitted work
 * 2) wickerwork

title: împletitură


text:
brăcire

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1)  belt, girdle, cord

title: brăcire


text:
bracile

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) girdle, band

title: bracile


text:
User:Crtew

I'm new here, but I'm interested in the neologism, which are brand new words that are created and spread. I'm not interested in the nonce until it gets picked up in useage. Perhaps these new words become vogue words spread by the mainstream media or social media or go international or even "viral". The cultural process fascinates me. If I hear of one, I have to "Google" it immediately!

Places to go on Wiktionary:
 * Category:English neologisms
 * User:Visviva/Tracking

I read Wordspy.

title: User:Crtew


text:
șiret

Etymology 1
, from.

Noun

 * 1) cord
 * 2) lace, shoelace, shoestring
 * 1) lace, shoelace, shoestring

Etymology 2
.

Adjective

 * 1) sly, cunning, shrewd, crafty, artful

Noun

 * 1) a sly or cunning person

title: șiret


text:
cyanean

Adjective

 * 1) Having an azure colour.

title: cyanean


text:
deprivement

Noun

 * 1) deprivation

title: deprivement


text: deprivements

title: deprivements


text:
User talk:Echo~enwiktionary

Request for usurpation
Hello, Echo. A request has been made at Changing username to usurp, or "take over", your username because you have not used it to edit, and another user would like to use it to edit. Changing username says that any unused username may be usurped if the user is given seven days' notice to object and does not do so.

If you have an e-mail address set in your preferences, you should be getting an e-mail from a bureaucrat or changing username clerk explaining how to consent or object to this process.

If you do not object to being renamed to a new username in order for another user to utilize the name you currently have, please log in and post a reply here saying so (you may also tell us what username you would like to be renamed to, or we will provide you with a generic one).

If you do nothing, the request will be filled after seven days, and your account will be moved to a generic username. You may request that it be moved to a new username of your choice at any time.

If you object to being renamed, please log in and make an edit to this page clearly stating that you object to usurpation.

Please note that even if your current username is usurped, you can still edit and your data will not be lost; your preferences, watchlist, and other user settings will be transferred to a new username.

Thank you for your time.

Hurricanefan25 19:18, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Echo. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Echo~enwiktionary that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:44, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 07:04, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Echo~enwiktionary


text:
galdre

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) wizard

title: galdre


text:
User talk:Hurricanefan25

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, welcome to Wiktionary, and thank you for your contribution so far. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

 * How to edit a page is a concise list of technical guidelines to the wiki format we use here: how to, for example, make text boldfaced or create hyperlinks. Feel free to practice in the sandbox. If you would like a slower introduction we have a short tutorial.
 * Entry layout explained (ELE) is a detailed policy documenting how Wiktionary pages should be formatted. All entries should conform to this standard, the easiest way to do this is to copy exactly an existing page for a similar word.
 * Our Criteria for inclusion (CFI) define exactly which words Wiktionary is interested in including. There is also a list of things that Wiktionary is not for a higher level overview.
 * The FAQ aims to answer most of your remaining questions, and there are several help pages that you can browse for more information.
 * We have discussion rooms in which you can ask any question about Wiktionary or its entries, a glossary of our technical jargon, and some hints for dealing with the more common communication issues.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wiktionarian! If you have any questions, bring them to the Information desk, or ask me on my talk page. If you do so, please sign your posts with four tildes: ~ which automatically produces your username and the current date and time.

Again, welcome! -- Cirt (talk) 20:05, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Hurricanefan25


text:
User talk:Themklife

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, welcome to Wiktionary, and thank you for your contribution so far. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

 * How to edit a page is a concise list of technical guidelines to the wiki format we use here: how to, for example, make text boldfaced or create hyperlinks. Feel free to practice in the sandbox. If you would like a slower introduction we have a short tutorial.
 * Entry layout explained (ELE) is a detailed policy documenting how Wiktionary pages should be formatted. All entries should conform to this standard, the easiest way to do this is to copy exactly an existing page for a similar word.
 * Our Criteria for inclusion (CFI) define exactly which words Wiktionary is interested in including. There is also a list of things that Wiktionary is not for a higher level overview.
 * The FAQ aims to answer most of your remaining questions, and there are several help pages that you can browse for more information.
 * We have discussion rooms in which you can ask any question about Wiktionary or its entries, a glossary of our technical jargon, and some hints for dealing with the more common communication issues.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wiktionarian! If you have any questions, bring them to the Information desk, or ask me on my talk page. If you do so, please sign your posts with four tildes: ~ which automatically produces your username and the current date and time.

Again, welcome! -- Cirt (talk) 20:05, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Themklife


text:
Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2012-02/Independence

Independence

 * Voting on: Changing Criteria for inclusion from this:  This is meant to exclude multiple references that draw on each other. Where Wikipedia has an article on a given subject, and that article is mirrored by an external site the use of certain words on the mirror site would not be independent. It is quite common to find that material on one site is readily traced to another. Similarly, the same quote will often occur verbatim in separate sources. While the sources may be independent of each other, the usages in question are clearly not.  The presumption is that if a term is only used in a narrow community, there is no need to refer to a general dictionary such as this one to find its meaning.   to this:   This serves to prevent double-counting of usages that are not truly distinct. Roughly speaking, we generally consider two uses of a term to be "independent" if they are in different sentences by different people, and to be non-independent if: one is a verbatim or near-verbatim quotation of the other; orboth are verbatim or near-verbatim quotations or translations of a single original source; orboth are by the same author. If two or more usages are not independent of each other, then only one of them can be used for purposes of attestation.
 * Vote starts: 00:01, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Vote ends: 23:59, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

 * Vote created: —Ruakh TALK 20:12, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Discussion:
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] Beer parlour archive/2011/February
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] Beer parlour archive/2011/October
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] Beer parlour
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2012-02/Independence

Support

 * 1) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support  Good one. I was wondering before why the Independence section makes so little sense; this is a much needed improvement. -- Liliana • 04:58, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support Dan Polansky 08:14, 22 February 2012 (UTC) --Dan Polansky 08:14, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support. Big improvement on the previous version. Mglovesfun (talk) 21:44, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support --Daniel 21:51, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support. —msh210℠ (talk) 21:53, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support < class="latinx" >Ƿidsiþ 13:44, 24 February 2012 (UTC) A definite improvement.
 * 7) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support . A big improvement. I only have two minor disagreements: the title should remain "Independence", not "Independent", and verbatim should remain wikified. What was your motive for changing those? Ungoliant MMDCCLXIV 17:31, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
 * For "independent" vs "independence", see Wiktionary_talk:Votes/pl-2012-02/Independence. --Dan Polansky (talk) 17:36, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The de-linkifying of was an oversight on my part. Unfortunately, we've reached a level of bureaucracy that makes it difficult to correct such oversights. :-/   —Ruakh TALK 15:35, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Fwiw, I continue to support if it's undelinkified. Otoh, I prefer it unundelinkified like the rest of the page. —msh210℠ (talk) 20:54, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support Equinox ◑ 17:41, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support - -sche (discuss) 03:13, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support --Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 15:35, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support  An improvement, although the wording could be simpler. See Wiktionary_talk:Votes/pl-2012-02/Independence —Michael Z. 2012-03-11 21:35 z
 * 5) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support -- Cirt (talk) 07:21, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose  EncycloPetey 21:31, 22 February 2012 (UTC) although the idea behind this change is one I support, there are specific problems enough that I must oppose because this needs rewording.  The new wording relies too heavily on one being a quotation of the other, and that isn't always the case.  Furthermore, it does not cover the possibility that both items being considered derive from a third option not included.  If we can reword the proposed new text to handle these situations smoothly, then I would support making the change. --EncycloPetey 21:31, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Re: "and that isn't always the case: Such as when? --Dan Polansky 21:41, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Such as when a strong deliberate allusion is made to another source, without quoting it. The new wording also seems to prevent the inclusion of proverbs, which are typically verbatim. --EncycloPetey 06:07, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
 * To attest a proverb, one has to quote not only the proverb but also some of the surrounding sentences. It is the whole attesting quotation (that includes the proverb only as a component) that is subject to the requirement that it should not be "verbatim or near-verbatim quotation of the other". When the proverb is quoted without its textual context, there is no way the quotation could help support various hypotheses about the meaning of the proverb. --Dan Polansky 07:23, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Re: "it does not cover the possibility that both items being considered derive from a third option": how so, there is "both are verbatim or near-verbatim quotations or translations of a single original source", which seems to cover that. --Dan Polansky 21:41, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Because that option still depends on the texts being verbatim or nearly verbatim, which isn't always the case. There are a number of works and chronicles I've worked in that are clearly all from a single original source, but in which the parallel sections aren't always verbatim or even nearly so. --EncycloPetey 06:07, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose. While the flow of the wording is captivating, and thought it can be productive to be specific, this enumeration seems too narrow to me. Sometimes vagueness and generalities are better at capturing the idea. DAVilla 03:27, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Abstain

 * 1) [[Image:Symbol abstain vote.svg|20px]] Abstain . This is not an improvement, in my opinion. Both the old and new versions are very vague yet not nearly vague enough, and both have parts that must be simply ignored. If the new version of this policy were strictly followed, we would probably have to delete entries like et tu, Brute, for which every use is technically is a verbatim quotation. --Yair rand (talk) 00:31, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
 * We wouldn't have to, no. The new version intentionally uses language like "roughly speaking" and "generally", exactly because of (on the one hand) such situations as you describe and (conversely, on the other) such situations as EncycloPetey describes above. (I now feel that I should have sprinkled a few more such hedges in there, but I guess it's too late.) —Ruakh TALK 00:36, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) * We wouldn't have to exclude et tu, Brute, because it is the whole quotation attesting the term that must not be a verbatim copy: 'The head looks a sort of reproachfully at him, with an “Et tu Brute!” expression' is not a verbatim copy of the original Shakespeare quote. To want to check the verbatim sameness on the term level rather than quotation level is silly: of course "cat" equals "cat", and "don't cry over spilled milk" equals "don't cry over spilled milk". This is the same argument that I have given above regarding proverbs in response to EncycloPetey. Incidentally, the 2002 and 2006 citations provided at et tu, Brute look like mentions rather than uses to convey meaning to me. --Dan Polansky (talk) 07:46, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Decision
12-2-1 (85,7%) - Passed. --Daniel 11:50, 23 March 2012 (UTC)


text:
Thread:User talk:Yair rand/Thanks for creating Category:en:Organizations/reply (2)

I didn't actually create the original Organizations category, I just bot-produced all the English versions when the community voted to put English entries into separate categories from the multilingual category. Many of the entries that were nominated for deletion really should be deleted, because they can't really be considered "words" or "terms" at all, at least in my opinion. Sorry I couldn't be of help.


text:
beclipping

Etymology 1
From, , from , equivalent to.

Noun

 * 1)  An embrace.

Etymology 2
From.

title: beclipping


text:
beclog

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  To encumber with a sticky substance; clog.

title: beclog


text:
Thread:User talk:Yair rand/ head/reply

(Discussion continued at User talk:Liliana-60)

title: Thread:User talk:Yair rand/ head/reply


text:
beclose

Etymology
From, , alteration (due to 🇨🇬) of earlier , from , equivalent to. See also.

Verb

 * 1)  To shut up or in; enclose; enwrap.
 * 2)  To imprison.
 * 1)  To imprison.
 * 1)  To imprison.

title: beclose


text:
mustamaalaus

Noun

 * 1) smear campaign effort to damage or call into question someone's reputation, by propounding negative propaganda

title: mustamaalaus


text:
beclout

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  To cover with a clout or cloth.
 * 2)  To dress up.

title: beclout


text:
beclumpse

Etymology
From. Compare,.

Verb

 * 1)  To benumb.

title: beclumpse


text:
becomse

Etymology
From, equivalent to , a syncopated variant of.

Verb

 * 1)  To begin; commence.

title: becomse


text: wieku

title: wieku


text: tygodniu

title: tygodniu


text: miłości

title: miłości


text:
becross

Etymology
From. Compare 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬,, 🇨🇬,. Compare also 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1)  To mark with the sign of the cross.
 * 2)  To surround or decorate with crosses.

Translations

 * Dutch:

 * Dutch:

title: becross


text: wojny

title: wojny


text:
encombrement

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) traffic congestion
 * 2) cluttering, jamming, obstruction
 * 3) overcrowding, saturation

title: encombrement


text:
allostérique

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1)  allosteric

title: allostérique


text:
dialysat

Noun

 * 1)  dialysate

title: dialysat


text:
Milice

Proper noun

 * 1)  The French paramilitary force in Vichy France from 1940-1944 used to fight against internal dissent.

title: Milice


text:
czyż

Etymology 1
From.

Etymology 2
.

Noun

 * 1) siskin
 * 2) Eurasian siskin

title: czyż


text: hox genes

title: hox genes


text:
sténose

Noun

 * 1)  stenosis

title: sténose


text:
shoer

Etymology
From, , from , , equivalent to.

Noun

 * 1) One who fits shoes to the feet.

title: shoer


text: shoers

title: shoers


text:
suberate

Noun

 * 1)  A salt or ester of suberic acid.

Translations

 * French:

title: suberate


text: suberates

title: suberates


text:
iconomachy

Etymology
From εἰκονομαχία (eikonomakhía), from εἰκών (eikṓn, "likeness, image, portrait") and -μαχία (-makhía, "battle, fight"), literally meaning "war against images" or "war on icons".

Noun

 * 1) Hostility to images as objects of worship.

title: iconomachy


text:
somatocyst

Noun

 * 1)  A cavity in the primary nectocalyx of certain.

title: somatocyst


text: somatocysts

title: somatocysts


text:
misle

Etymology 1
Probably a.

Noun

 * 1) A fine rain or thick mist; mizzle.

Verb

 * 1) To rain in fine drops; to mizzle.

Etymology 2
From, the standard irregular past tense of , being misconstrued as *misle.

Verb

 * 1)  To mislead.

title: misle


text: deboshment

title: deboshment


text: deboshments

title: deboshments


text:
anchusin

Etymology
Borrowed from.

Noun

 * 1)  A resinoid colouring matter obtained from alkanet root.

title: anchusin


text:
chawdron

Etymology
, from, from , from , from. Compare 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, and 🇨🇬. .

The modern English form has had inserted after ; the current predominance of the spelling chawdron is probably due to the influence of.

Noun

 * 1)  A sauce made from chopped entrails.
 * 2)  Entrails, intestines of animals as food
 * 1)  Entrails, intestines of animals as food
 * 1)  Entrails, intestines of animals as food
 * 1)  Entrails, intestines of animals as food

Translations

 * Middle English: chaudoun
 * Old French: chaudun

title: chawdron


text: chawdrons

title: chawdrons


text:
tailzie

Etymology
From. See. For the z, compare etymology of.

Noun

 * 1)  An entailment or deed whereby the legal course of succession is cut off, and an arbitrary one substituted.

title: tailzie


text: tailzies

title: tailzies


text:
resolutory

Adjective

 * 1) resolutive

title: resolutory


text: scelet

title: scelet


text: scelets

title: scelets


text:
decession

Etymology
From, from. See.

Noun

 * 1)  departure; decrease

title: decession


text: decessions

title: decessions


text: eloinment

title: eloinment


text:
pagehood

Noun

 * 1) The state of being a page (servant).

title: pagehood


text: sulphoacid

title: sulphoacid


text: sulphoacids

title: sulphoacids


text:
solvend

Etymology
From, from. See.

Noun

 * 1) A substance to be dissolved.

title: solvend


text: solvends

title: solvends


text:
lithosphérique

Adjective

 * 1) lithospheric

title: lithosphérique


text:
discontentation

Noun

 * 1)  discontent

title: discontentation


text: discontentations

title: discontentations


text:
disquisitionary

Adjective

 * 1)  disquisitional (pertaining to disquisition).

title: disquisitionary


text: Category:pl:Light sources

title: Category:pl:Light sources


text:
imperdible

Etymology
From +.

Adjective

 * 1)  Not destructible.

Etymology
From. In the noun sense, an.

Adjective

 * 1) unmissable, not-to-miss

Noun

 * 1) safety pin

Adjective

 * 1) unmissable, not-to-miss

Noun

 * 1) safety pin

title: imperdible


text:
cognizably

Adverb

 * 1) In a cognizable manner.

title: cognizably


text: Category:pt:Light sources

title: Category:pt:Light sources


text:
psalmograph

Etymology
See.

Noun

 * 1)  A writer of psalms.

title: psalmograph


text:
Thread:User talk:Yair rand/Thanks for creating Category:en:Organizations/reply (3)

no worries, and thanks for the reply and helpful explanation! ;) Cheers!


text:
cloisterer

Etymology
From, , from ; equivalent to ; compare 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) One belonging to, or living in, a cloister; a recluse.

title: cloisterer


text: cloisterers

title: cloisterers


text: epicenos

title: epicenos


text:
burinist

Noun

 * 1) One who engraves with a burin.

title: burinist


text: burinists

title: burinists


text:
superfrontal

Adjective

 * 1)  Relating to the upper part of the frontal lobe of the brain.

Noun

 * 1) A cloth placed over the top of an altar, often hanging down a few inches over the frontal.

title: superfrontal


text: superfrontals

title: superfrontals


text: epicenas

title: epicenas


text: Category:Turkmen terms derived from Persian


text: Template:list:sexual orientations/tl

title: Template:list:sexual orientations/tl


text: Category:Turkmen terms derived from Iranian languages


text:
imbathe

Etymology
From.

title: imbathe


text: imbathed

title: imbathed


text: imbathes

title: imbathes


text: imbathing

title: imbathing


text: Category:Turkmen terms derived from Indo-Iranian languages


text: lavolt

title: lavolt


text: lavolts

title: lavolts


text:
ponction

Etymology
. Compare the inherited doublet.

Noun

 * 1) puncture (especially a surgical one)
 * 2) deduction, that which is taken away such as a tax

title: ponction


text:
chrisom

Etymology
See.

Noun

 * 1)  A white cloth, anointed with chrism, or a white mantle thrown over a child when baptized or christened.

title: chrisom


text: chrisoms

title: chrisoms


text:
albication

Noun

 * 1) The process of becoming white, or developing white patches or streaks.

title: albication


text:
extuberant

Etymology
.

Adjective

 * 1) swelling out; protuberant

title: extuberant


text:
Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2012-02/Patronymics and stylistic edits of CFI

Patronymics and stylistic edits of CFI

 * Voting on: Making the changes to Criteria for inclusion that are represented in this diff; that is, tidying WT:CFI in several places, and removing the line about the status of patronymics being unsettled. These small changes received broad support in the straw poll. The changes are:

 * Change: This in turn leads to the somewhat more formal guideline of including a term if it is attested and idiomatic.    To this:  This in turn leads to the somewhat more formal guideline of including a term if it is attested and idiomatic.

 * Change the header “Terms” to be broadly interpreted to Terms.

 * Change * Proverbs to * Proverbs. (with a dot) to match the punctuation of the items around it.

 * Remove the hidden comment <!-- removed: blogs and -->.

 * Change to merit its own page the formatting of such a page to to merit its own page, the formatting of such a page (with a comma).

 * Remove one of the two lines of whitespace after "These languages include Quenya, Sindarin, Klingon, and Orcish (the first three do have ISO 639-3 codes)."

 * Standardise the use of spaces in subject headers by removing the spaces between the subject header text and the equals-signs in the minority of headers which currently have such spaces (Names, <tt>Company names</tt>, <tt>Brand names</tt>, <tt>Given and family names</tt>, <tt>Names of specific entities</tt>, <tt>Issues to consider</tt>, Attestation vs. the slippery slope</tt>).

 * Change <tt>=== Genealogic content ===</tt> to <tt>===Genealogical content===</tt> (i.e. remove whitespace and change to a more common word).

 * Remove the horizontal rules before the <tt>Names</tt> and <tt>Issues to consider</tt> sections. (These are the only horizontal rules in the document.)

 * Remove: The status of patronymics has not been settled.

 * Remove the "See also" section and move "* Votes/2011-04/Sourced policies" into the References section.

 * Technical note: if Votes/pl-2012-02/CFI and company names passes, that vote shall supersede this vote with respect to the section(s) Votes/pl-2012-02/CFI and company names changes.

 * Vote starts: 00:01, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Vote ends: 23.59, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

 * Vote created: - -sche (discuss) 22:49, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Discussion:
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] Beer_parlour_archive/2011/October
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2012-02/Patronymics and stylistic edits of CFI

Support

 * 1) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support Liliana • 05:00, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support --Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 05:11, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support Dan Polansky 08:13, 22 February 2012 (UTC) Above all, I support that patronymics are included when attested. --Dan Polansky 08:29, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support — I also support changing WT:CFI so that it consistently uses typographic apostrophes and quotation marks, which was suggested by -sche on the talk page. — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 14:43, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support EncycloPetey 21:33, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support - -sche (discuss) 21:38, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support. —msh210℠ (talk) 21:59, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support, though I think it says something bad about this project that even such minor changes are considered to require a vote. —Ruakh <i >TALK</i > 06:27, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Voting on minor changes is good. It is much better to vote on minor changes than to argue about and define what is and what is not a minor change. A vote that contains minor changes can run only for 14 days, or even for 7 days. --Dan Polansky (talk)
 * That isn't even the worst. People even argued that correcting a blatantly wrong figure requires a month-long vote. -- Liliana • 12:27, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
 * No one argued that "correcting a blatantly wrong figure requires a month-long vote" (italics mine), only that it requires some vote. --Dan Polansky (talk) 16:22, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support. Ungoliant MMDCCLXIV 17:55, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support —Internoob 03:18, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support -- Cirt (talk) 07:22, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Abstain

 * 1) [[Image:Symbol abstain vote.svg|20px]] Abstain DAVilla 03:39, 26 February 2012 (UTC) Far too tedious for consideration.
 * 2) [[Image:Symbol abstain vote.svg|20px]] Abstain --Daniel 16:49, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure about Remove the "See also" section and move "* Wiktionary:Votes/2011-04/Sourced policies" into the References section.
 * Why would we do that? Why is the References section better than the See also section, especially for a vote that applies to the whole policy? Would the same section be removed from WT:ELE as well, I suppose? If Votes/2011-04/Sourced policies is moved to the References section, would it refer to which sentence, if any? Please don't tell me we would have these meta-references at the bottom, for example. --Daniel 16:49, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
 * My reason for moving it to the References section is that "See also" suggests it's another policy of ours (putting a link to WT:ELE in the See also section might not be a bad idea), when it fact it is merely the vote that established that we should have link our policy-bits to the votes that effected them. The references section seemed to me like an appropriate place to put it. - -sche (discuss) 03:17, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Decision
11-0-2 (100%) - Passes. --Daniel 12:01, 23 March 2012 (UTC)


text:
coinsurer

Noun

 * 1) A provider of coinsurance (joint insurer-client assumed risk).

Translations

 * Spanish: coasegurador

title: coinsurer


text: coinsurers

title: coinsurers


text:
User talk:Itkilledthecat

Jamesjiao → T ◊ C 22:56, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks so much. I'm feeling very happy having been given a welcome. I try to improve the pages in English Wiktionary. Best regards --Itkilledthecat 08:19, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

not in french entries for the right categories please!!

 * umm, ok. --Itkilledthecat 00:43, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

niggercunt
I am sure it can be created, but it doesn't seem to be used other than as a sum of parts.Lucifer 02:15, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I look forward to it --Itkilledthecat 06:41, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

benshi
Hi,

You left the entry in a bad state, please fix. --Anatoli (обсудить) 07:49, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
 * done--Itkilledthecat (talk) 09:47, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

fader
Hi there. I was just struggling to understand this verb. Does it also mean "to share out the booty (from a crime etc)"? SemperBlotto (talk) 10:22, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Maybe. I think that definition you give is outdated or something. The kids today use se fader to mean to get stuck with an unpleasnant task,. --Itkilledthecat (talk) 11:45, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

culón
RE:Hi Lucifer. Thanks again for your entries, it is always a pleasure to read them. Of your recent Spanish entries, culón is my favourite. To let you know, we call this type of word an augmentative. solterón, cabezón and mujerona are other good examples of augmentatives in Spanish. Keep on rocking, dude!

LOL your welcome, are you rockpilot? What is the difference between superlative and augmentative I used augmentative at first but then switched to superlative cause it seemed more appropriate but I am not sure.Lucifer (talk) 22:11, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Well bye wonderfool
Thank you for the mess you left behind. Jamesjiao → T ◊ C 22:22, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Itkilledthecat


text:
genètic

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) genetic

title: genètic


text:
genètica

Etymology 1
Feminine substantivized form of.

Noun

 * 1) genetics

title: genètica


text:
asegurador

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1)  insurance

Noun

 * 1)  insurance agent; insurer
 * 2)  belayer

title: asegurador


text: genetistes

title: genetistes


text: genetistas

title: genetistas


text:
coasegurador

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) coinsurer

title: coasegurador


text: potato starches

title: potato starches


text:
arqueològic

Etymology
From, ultimately from.

Adjective

 * 1) archaeological

title: arqueològic


text: arqueològica

title: arqueològica


text: arqueològics

title: arqueològics


text: arqueològiques

title: arqueològiques


text:
Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2012-02/Attestation vs the slippery slope

Attestation vs the slippery slope

 * Voting on: Removing the "Issues to consider" section from Criteria for inclusion:  There is occasionally concern that adding an entry for a particular term will lead to entries for a large number of similar terms. This is not a problem, as each term is considered on its own based on its usage, not on the usage of terms similar in form. Some examples: Any word in any language might be borrowed into English, but only a few actually are. Including spaghetti does not imply that ricordati is next (though it is of course fine as an Italian entry). Any word may be rendered in pig Latin, but only a few (e.g., amscray) have found their way into common use. Any word may be rendered in leet style, but only a few (e.g., pr0n) see general use. Grammatical affixes like meta- and -ance can be added in a great many more cases than they actually are. (Inflectional suffixes like -s for the plural of a noun and -ed for the past tense of a verb can actually be used for almost any noun or verb.) It may seem that trendy internet prefixes like e- and i- are used everywhere, but they aren’t. If I decide to talk about e-thumb-twiddling but no one else does, then there’s no need for an entry. The straw poll showed community support for the removal of this section.
 * Vote starts: 00:01, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Vote ends: 23.59, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

 * Vote created: - -sche (discuss) 23:16, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Discussion:
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] Votes/pl-2011-01/Final sections of the CFI
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] Beer parlour archive/2011/October
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] Beer parlour archive/2011/October
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2012-02/Attestation vs the slippery slope

Support

 * 1) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support Dan Polansky 08:36, 22 February 2012 (UTC) The section is (a) needless and (b) misleading by its reference to "common use" and "general use". Ad (a), it goes without saying that each term is considered on its own, as long as CFI does not say otherwise, which it does not. Ad (b), the section implies that only terms that are in "common use" and "general use" can be included, by its language in bullet point 2 and bullet point 3, but in fact, any attested and idiomatic term can be included, even if it is rare and only used by specialists. --Dan Polansky 08:36, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support Mglovesfun (talk) 16:57, 22 February 2012 (UTC). Off topic material, it's good talk page material, nothing more and nothing less. Mglovesfun (talk) 16:57, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support - -sche (discuss) 21:39, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support --Daniel 23:00, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support --Yair rand 00:17, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support < class="latinx" >Ƿidsiþ 13:46, 24 February 2012 (UTC) Amateurish and tangental.
 * 7) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support —Ruakh TALK 19:33, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support because nothing is added by including so many bullet points, but I wouldn't call it amateurish. Some of these were controversial topics, and the clarity sought compromise in its day. DAVilla 03:37, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 9) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support -- Cirt (talk) 07:23, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose   for the same reasons I opposed it in the last vote -- Liliana • 05:01, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The reason you gave in that vote: "This is a good section to link to in case such an argument is ever presented at an RfD or elsewhere." --Dan Polansky 08:36, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't think CFI needs to address a variety of potential arguments that have nothing to do with CFI. If one person says in RFD that "pr0n should be excluded, as adding an entry for it will lead to entries for a large number of similar terms", an avaliable response is that "this is not a CFI consideration; CFI mandates inclusion of terms that are attested and idiomatic", or the like. --Dan Polansky 16:13, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose  EncycloPetey 21:34, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) As indicated in the straw poll, I oppose the removal. I was going to abstain, since the straw poll seemed to indicate community support for removal. But now I realize that we've voted on this already and there is no such community support, so I'm opposing instead. —msh210℠ (talk) 21:57, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * But there is no community support for having the section in CFI in the first place, and the section got to CFI without a vote. The state of affairs in which sections unsupported by even a plain majority stay in CFI is a poor one, IMHO. Then we cannot say that CFI tracks consensus, and we cannot take it seriously. Furthermore, there is nothing wrong about repeating votes when people had time to rethink the issue, and new editors came to the project. --Dan Polansky 22:02, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * True, but I would have been less likely to start this vote if I had known/recalled that the issue had already been voted on. - -sche (discuss) 22:45, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * That the CFI were never voted in as a whole may be a problem, but now that this vote is structured not as "shall we do away with all of the CFI except such parts as were voted in and start again de novo?" but as "do we want this part?", I say yes, we want this part. (Perhaps someone should start that vote, after determining what parts of the CFI have not been voted in. That'd be fun.) As to your point that there's nothing wrong with repeating the vote, I agree, there's nothing wrong with it (in this case, anyway): my point in mentioning the previous vote wasn't to indicate my displeasure that the vote's being repeated but rather merely to mark my discovery of that previous vote, as a part of explaining why I'm opposing rather than abstaining. —msh210℠ (talk) 00:00, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
 * To start CFI de novo is too challenging and revolutionary a project, I think. Removing parts of CFI that are not part of the core and are supported only by a strict minority (<50%) seems doable without turning policy-making in Wiktionary upside down. I think even the opposers of this vote would have to admit that the discussed section is nowhere crucial to the way CFI is applied on a daily basis, unlike "This in turn leads to the somewhat more formal guideline of including a term if it is attested and idiomatic." --Dan Polansky 07:39, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
 * @msh210, I feel that's a bit like saying Barack Obama won the last presidential election, so he should be president forever. Mglovesfun (talk) 08:56, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm not seeing the analogy. Perhaps you misunderstand what I wrote above. I meant this: I oppose this proposal. I would abstain rather than vote in opposition because there was consensus in the straw poll. But then I realized that that straw poll was only half the story and that there is in fact opposition,so my reason not to voice mine is gone. Hence my vote. —msh210℠ (talk) 09:59, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Understood. But the key question still remains: why do you oppose? Do you want some attested leet spelling excluded? Do you acknowledge the presence of the language of "common use" and "general use" as a bug, or is it actually a feature for you? Would you be okay with having the section trimmed to "There is occasionally concern that adding an entry for a particular term will lead to entries for a large number of similar terms. This is not a problem, as each term is considered on its own based on its usage, not on the usage of terms similar in form."? --Dan Polansky (talk) 10:25, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I do not want attested leet spellings excluded (assuming they are attested properly, viz in running English text. E.g., "I was looking at pr0n" would be a good citation for pr0n whereas "| \/\/ /-\ 5 L00|<II\I(- @ pr0n" would not be. But that's not the point here). The terms "common use" and "general use" are faulty, as are some other aspects of the section as it stands, but I think that having a section to indicate the main point is important. That point is what you rewrote, just above, quite well. Changing it to that wording would be fine by me. Changing it to that wording plus some specific examples like it has now (about loanwords, leetspeak, affixed words, and similar) would be even better. —msh210℠ (talk) 20:47, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * It may neither be here nor there, but we attest all orthographies; if there is an attested orthography of English where looking is spelled L00|<II\I(-, then <II\I(- is a perfectly valid entry.--Prosfilaes (talk) 04:39, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Just to clarify: I did not rewrite anything; I have just quoted the first two sentences. The rest of the section is an exemplification of the first two sentences. --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:05, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose. How would we deal with leet entries without this section? Words like s0m3, wh1p, w1nd0w would be attestable. Ungoliant MMDCCLXIV 21:40, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
 * This passage already doesn't deal with that. It mentions leet but doesn't propose any action on it. Mglovesfun (talk) 21:42, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Come to think of it, this section doesn't recommend or enforce any action on anything. It's just discussion. Mglovesfun (talk) 21:44, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
 * It could do with some improvement. Even though it doesn't recommend or enforce anything, it makes it clear that we don't just accept any leet entry, only those with general use. Ungoliant MMDCCLXIV 21:50, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Re "it makes it clear that we don't just accept any leet entry, only those with general use": no, the only thing it says is that "only a few" words are in "general use" in pig Latin / leet. Nowhere does it say uncommon / non-general-use words are not accepted. Consequently, it doesn't affect our practice of accepting every attested pig Latin and leet word. It just idly observes that many ordsway aren't "common". - -sche (discuss) 00:38, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
 * True, but I think that's the impression a newcomer reading it will get. He will know that we have something to say about leet. "but only a few (e.g., pr0n) see general use." might not be rule carved in stone (or even a rule), but in my opinion it's a way to prevent some well-intentioned newcomer from creating as many leet terms as he can just because they seem to be lacking and the CFI doesn't say anything about it. This is far from ideal and should be regulated, but I repeat: it's better to have it mentioned somewhere than not at all. Ungoliant MMDCCLXIV 01:58, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Maybe Criteria for inclusion? —Ruakh <i >TALK</i > 22:28, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Leet isn't misspelling (or: when it is, it's intentional); so I don't think WT:CFI addresses it. If it's ever expanded to address leet (and the Pig Latin issue), I'd support getting rid of Attestation vs. the slippery slope section. Until then it's better to have leet and Pig Latin mentioned somewhere than not at all. Ungoliant MMDCCLXIV 00:10, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Re: "How would we deal with leet entries without this section?": The same way as other terms: they are included iff they are attested and idiomatic. Single-word terms are automatically idiomatic, so they only need to be attested. If you are saying that some leet spellings should be excluded even if attestable, that is something that I do not know community consensus has ever supported. Thus, if a specific more stringent regulation for leet spelling is to be developed, the first thing to do is to remove the community-unsupported text from CFI, and figure out what the community thinks of leet spellings in the first place. Once a more stringent regulation is developed, it will not be part of a slippery-slope section; right now, the mention of leet is there only to illustrate the rejection of a slippery-slope argument. Re: "I think that's the impression a newcomer reading it will get": This is just cheating. What you are saying is, let us trick the poor newcomer into believing that the community has agreed that leet should be largely excluded even if attestable, when nothing of the sort is true. This is it, the CFI text just deceives the newcomer about the community consensus. It is this that I find so annoying, about this vote and about some of the other currently running votes. --Dan Polansky (talk) 07:54, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't call it deceiving. If the Attestation vs the slippery slope section has been in the CFI for so long, there is community support for it (or at least there was. I don't think it will survive this vote). Sorry to disappoint you guys. I honestly think it's a good idea to keep it in the CFI for now. Ungoliant MMDCCLXIV 17:50, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
 * It is deceiving, because you want to create an impression in the newcomer that is different from what the section actually means in terms of its impact on RFD and RFV.
 * Re: "If the Attestation vs the slippery slope section has been in the CFI for so long, there is community support for it": That is incorrect. If you look at the history of CFI, hardly anything was ever removed from it without a vote, while things were added without a vote that turned out to have very little community support. A community support is determined via voting and polling, not via things being sneaked into CFI and then left unopposed. Furthermore, the section does not do all that much harm, I admit, as hardly anyone ever refers to it in RFD and RFV, so getting the section removed was not a priority, and still is not. Thus, I did not bother to try to get it removed, especially considering that getting anything removed from CFI is hard, as it suffices that 1/3 of voters opposes. It is just annyoing that we ask every newcomer to read a document that contains verbiage that should better get removed, so that reading CFI is actually worth the effort for the newbie.
 * The section can easily survive this vote. Right now, the vote is 6:4 for removal, which is no consensus and thus the section would stay. The section did not need to get anything like 2/3-supermajoritarian support to get into CFI. --Dan Polansky (talk) 18:06, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose  --Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 15:46, 9 March 2012 (UTC) I remember when I was a newbie (wait, I'm still a newbie... whatever) and I actually bothered to read through the CFI. To be honest, this sort of thing is actually helpful. I don't think it's tricksy, and if a newbie has read down to the bottom and still doesn't get the concept of attestation, they're a lost cause anyway.

Abstain

 * 1) [[Image:Symbol abstain vote.svg|20px]] Abstain I still remember how this section made clear the point that each term is attested independently, and doesn't serve as a precedent for including similar terms, when I was a noob. Couldn't it be replaced with a single phrase or sentence near the beginning of the guideline?  —Michael Z. 2012-03-15 17:48 z

Decision

 * No consensus, 9-5-1. --Yair rand (talk) 12:49, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
 * ...i.e., 64%. —msh210℠ (talk) 14:49, 27 March 2012 (UTC)


text: Category:ca:Scientists

title: Category:ca:Scientists


text:
arqueòleg

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) archaeologist

title: arqueòleg


text: arqueòlegs

title: arqueòlegs


text:
come si chiama

Phrase

 * 1) what's your name?

title: come si chiama


text:
biòleg

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) biologist

title: biòleg


text: biòlegs

title: biòlegs


text:
bacteriòleg

Noun

 * 1) bacteriologist

title: bacteriòleg


text: bacteriòlegs

title: bacteriòlegs


text:
bacteriológico

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) bacteriological

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) bacteriological

title: bacteriológico


text: bacteriológica

title: bacteriológica


text: bacteriológicos

title: bacteriológicos


text: bacteriológicas

title: bacteriológicas


text:
ergenlik

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) adolescence (period between childhood and maturity)
 * 2) state of being an adolescent

title: ergenlik


text:
kellik

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) baldness, calvity; state of being bald
 * 2) alopecia

title: kellik


text:
eksiklik

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) lack, defect, failing
 * 2) absence
 * 3) imperfection

Synonyms

 * (1, 2)
 * (3)

title: eksiklik


text:
öncelik

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) priority

title: öncelik


text:
Talk:klaarblijkelijk

I'm Dutch and I've never heard the comparative / superlative forms of "klaarblijkelijk"... Move to scratch those forms.
 * Have you done a google search on this or google books? Quite a few examples. You haven't heard it's used doesn't mean it's not used by others. I have to keep this in mind when editing English and Mandarin entries too. Jamesjiao → T ◊ C 00:28, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:klaarblijkelijk


text:
матушка

Noun

 * 1) mother, mum
 * 2) mother

Synonyms

 * ,, , , (derogatory)

title: матушка


text:
Musevilik

Noun

 * 1) Judaism
 * 2) Jewishness

title: Musevilik


text: taguans

title: taguans


text:
Yahudilik

Noun

 * 1) Judaism
 * 2) Jewishness

title: Yahudilik


text:
Appendix:Tone in Kra-Dai languages

Tone in Kra-Dai languages can be traced to various historical categories.

Background
Proto-Tai tones take on various tone values and contours in modern Tai languages. These tonal splits are determined by the following conditions:
 * 1) "Friction sounds": Aspirated onset, voiceless fricative, voiceless sonorant
 * 2) Unaspirated onset (voiceless)
 * 3) Glottalized/implosive onset (voiceless)
 * 4) Voiced onset (voiceless)

In addition, William J. Gedney developed a "tone-box" method to help determine historical tonal splits and mergers in modern Tai languages. There is a total of 20 possible slots in what is known as a "Gedney Box." (For a tutorial on Gedney boxes, see "A checklist for determining tones in Tai dialects" (1989) by William Gedney).

title: Appendix:Tone in Kra-Dai languages


text:
Musevi

Etymology
From, from.

Noun

 * 1) Jew, adherent of Judaism.
 * 2) Jewish, relating to Jews, their religion or their culture.
 * 3) A character in traditional Turkish shadow plays and.

title: Musevi


text:
User talk:Zhen Zhen

Why did you delete the language separators in rosbif? Jamesjiao → T ◊ C 01:42, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Zhen Zhen


text:
périveineux

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1)  perivenous

title: périveineux


text:
perivenous

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1)  Surrounding a vein.

title: perivenous


text:
veineux

Etymology
From ; cf. also Latin.

Adjective

 * 1)  vein; venous
 * 2) having numerous veins

title: veineux


text: veineuse

title: veineuse


text:
progressive metal

Noun

 * 1) a subgenre of heavy metal with progressive rock influences

Translations

 * Finnish: progressiivinen metalli
 * French:
 * Georgian: პროგრესული მეტალი
 * Marathi: प्रोग्रेसिव्ह मेटल
 * Portuguese: metal progressivo

title: progressive metal


text:
Citations:hǎcek

misspelling of

 * 1985, David Grambs, Literary Companion Dictionary: Words About Words ( Routledge, ISBN 9780710200525, “Accent and Symbol Terms”, page 378
 * ˇ   wing, wedge, hǎcek, inverted circumflex   (Karel Čapek)

title: Citations:hǎcek


text:
Citations:háçek

misspelling of

 * 1996, Australian Journal of Law and Society (School of Law, Macquarie University), volume 12, page 192
 * There is information in the Guide such as most readers never knew and possible have little need to know. Thus the háçek is an accent in the Czech and Croatian languages such as we see over the name of Beneš or Dubçek.

title: Citations:háçek


text:
ákótʼé

Verb

 * 1) he/she/it is right, correct
 * 2) he/she/it is thus

Usage notes
This is a neuter verb that uses only the imperfective mode.

title: ákótʼé


text:
Thread:User talk:Bequw/Problem with Gadget-WiktSidebarTranslation.js on fr.wiktionnary

Hi! You are the creator of this template : Gadget-WiktSidebarTranslation.js so I'm coming to whine here ;-) . Our french pro-tech user report a problem here ==> MediaWiki talk:Gadget-WiktSidebarTranslation.js. I use this gadget on fr.wiktionnary and yes some languages are shown as undefined until their french translations but we don't have any idea about the why. I test the gadget on english version but everything seems ok here. Do you able to fix this bug ? V!v£ l@ Rosière   /Murmur…/  04:46, 16 February 2012 (UTC)


text:
ałhosh

Verb

 * 1) he/she is sleeping, is asleep

title: ałhosh


text:
Talk:处士

山人
Does this term mean the same as 山人? 71.66.97.228 04:48, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:处士


text:
溶洞

Noun

 * 1) Karst cave

title: 溶洞


text: Template:User tlh-1

title: Template:User tlh-1


text: Template:User qya-1

title: Template:User qya-1


text: Template:User sjn-1

title: Template:User sjn-1


text:
defusive

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) That defuses.

title: defusive


text: Category:User tlh

title: Category:User tlh


text:
tavaramerkkinimi

Noun

 * 1) name brand trademark, or a distinctive name for a brand, or for a range of products by a single manufacturer

title: tavaramerkkinimi


text: Category:User qya

title: Category:User qya


text: Category:User sjn

title: Category:User sjn


text:
episcop

Etymology 1
, from, from (perhaps partly borrowed through  or ). Cf. also the archaic or regional doublet.

Noun

 * 1) bishop

Etymology 2
.

Noun

 * 1)  episcope

title: episcop


text:
łeeshchʼih

Etymology
From +.

Noun

 * 1) ashes, cinders

title: łeeshchʼih


text: Category:User tlh-1

title: Category:User tlh-1


text: Category:User sjn-1

title: Category:User sjn-1


text:
łeeʼshibéézh

Etymology
+

Noun

 * 1) pit-roasted corn
 * 2) chicos (the kernels of an ear of corn that has been roasted and dried, then the kernels removed and stored until cooking time)

title: łeeʼshibéézh


text: Category:User qya-1

title: Category:User qya-1


text:
łéʼéyázhí

Etymology
Combining form of, + +

Noun

 * 1) colt

title: łéʼéyázhí


text:
łééchąąłgaii

Etymology
+ +

Noun

 * 1) greyhound
 * 2) Greyhound bus

title: łééchąąłgaii


text: Template:User Shaw-1

title: Template:User Shaw-1


text:
łizhingo

Adverb

 * 1) blackly; it being black
 * 2) royal blue, navy blue

title: łizhingo


text:
Oozéí bizaad

Noun

 * 1) Hopi language

title: Oozéí bizaad


text: Template:User Dsrt-1

title: Template:User Dsrt-1


text: Template:User Teng-1

title: Template:User Teng-1


text:
Talk:rein

what should be correct pro

 * It depends on which language. —Stephen (Talk) 07:14, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

RFC discussion: August 2010
rfc-sense: To stop or restrain a horse. Also used figuratively

Should this be at rein in. Also can you rein/rein in a horse without reins? Because if so, that sense should me merged into the sense above (which says just that). Mglovesfun (talk) 21:38, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

take the reins
"Taking the reins" means taking control away from the previous controller. Should this be added to derived terms? JessIsTalking (talk) 17:41, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

 * ✅ Equinox ◑ 17:48, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

title: Talk:rein


text: Category:User Teng

title: Category:User Teng


text: tarbooshes

title: tarbooshes


text: Category:User Teng-1

title: Category:User Teng-1


text: Category:User Shaw-1

title: Category:User Shaw-1


text: Category:User Dsrt-1

title: Category:User Dsrt-1


text: Category:User Shaw

title: Category:User Shaw


text: Category:User Dsrt

title: Category:User Dsrt


text:
graphing calculator

Noun

 * 1)  A hand-held (usually programmable) electronic calculator which is capable of solving equations, plotting graphs and performing other tasks with variables.

Translations

 * Finnish:

title: graphing calculator


text:
Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2012-02/Patronymics and stylistic edits of CFI

Section "Terms"
I wholly support making the section heading '“Terms” to be broadly interpreted' shorter. However, "Terms" seems ambiguous, and I much prefer "Termhood" as a heading for a section that clarifies what CFI means by "term". Similarly, the section that defines what is meant by "idiomatic" is not called "Idiomatic" but rather "Idiomaticity", and the section that defines what it is to "attest" a term is not called "Attest" but rather "Attestation". --Dan Polansky 07:03, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

 * FWIW, I oppose "Termhood" because it's a relatively uncommon word, and sounds non-native (in fact, the first two pages of Google hits are the webpages of the same conference publications I've used to cite other non-natural-sounding words). - -sche (discuss) 10:00, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I admit that "termhood" is rather rare, but, from its morphology, it seems to be the most suitable term for the section heading. --Dan Polansky 11:54, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Clickable terms
Instead of boldfaced " term ", it would be better to write term, so that the reader can find the definition of the term "term" by clicking on the term. The same I would do with attested and idiomatic, which link to mainspace as if the two terms were defined in the mainspace rather than in CFI. Thus, I would write attested and idiomatic. I probably would not put the three terms in boldface, as they would be already hyperlinked and thus typographically distinct. --Dan Polansky 07:10, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I second re the linking (not re the nonboldfacing). —msh210℠ (talk) 18:42, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't have a preference one way (bold) or the other (linking). Anyone else have a preference? - -sche (discuss) 19:17, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

 * I'm neutral on the boldfacing, and I'm ambivalent on whether these words should be links to sections of WT:CFI, but I strongly agree that they should not be links to mainspace. —Ruakh TALK 20:44, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Directly in the vote
It seems much preferable to me to indicate proposed changes directly in the vote rather than letting the vote depend on a subpage of the user space: User:-sche/CFI. It seems unfortunate when a page in Wiktionary namespace depends for its key content on a page in User namespace, especially a vote. It is much more work to setup such a vote, I admit. One undesirable consequence of this dependence is that collaborative editing of the vote, by editors proposing edits that the creator can accept or reject, is impossible. --Dan Polansky 07:15, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I figured linking was more übersichtlich (easier to look over), particularly with regard to whitespace and spaces, and IIRC votes have cited diffs before, but it's easy to move everything into the vote page, so I've done so. :) Cheers! - -sche (discuss) 10:00, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Votes have indeed cited diffs before; I just did not bother to complain back then. --Dan Polansky 11:55, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Horizontal rules.
The "Names" and "Issues to consider" sections are preceded by horizontal rules (), but the other L2 sections are not. Maybe this is a good opportunity to make that consistent? (My preference is to remove both of the rules — it's all one document, after all, it's not like mainspace pages where a single page can host completely separate entries for different languages — but consistently adding horizontal rules would also be O.K., just so's its consistent.) —Ruakh TALK 16:57, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I second. —msh210℠ (talk) 18:42, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I'll add their removal to the vote. :) - -sche (discuss) 19:10, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Apostrophes and quotation marks
WT:CFI currently uses a mix of curly and straight apostrophes (included if it's likely, but they aren’t) and quotation marks (expression is “idiomatic”, idiomatic sense of "large traffic jam"). Can we get a consensus to use one or the other? - -sche (discuss) 19:10, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

 * Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2008-12/curly quotes in WT:ELE may (or may not) be relevant. —Ruakh TALK 22:15, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

 * Ha, I suspected this might be controversial. Well, I suppose it's best to leave that issue out of this vote. - -sche (discuss) 22:19, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

 * I favour using the typographical apostrophes and quotation marks. Note that that vote is over three years old and that two of the voters in opposition no longer edit here; AZard hasn't edited in over three years and this is Connel MacKenzie's only contribution he's made in over a year. — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 20:21, 20 February 2012 (UTC)


text: graphing calculators

title: graphing calculators


text:
pennavinur

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) pen pal, penfriend person with whom one communicates using letters, usually over a long distance

title: pennavinur


text:
ropsia

Verb

 * 1)  to slap

title: ropsia


text:
existability

Noun

 * 1) The possibility that something can exist.

title: existability


text:
hurlumhei

Etymology
Compare, , , ; possibly a sound-symbolic blend of these words (the foreign words are likely of origin).

Noun

 * 1) hassle, ruckus

title: hurlumhei


text:
mylläkkä

Noun

 * 1) hassle, ruckus

title: mylläkkä


text:
terveyskeskuslääkäri

Noun

 * 1) physician who works in an outpatient clinic

Usage notes
is usually the job title of a generalist, who treats the most common cases himself and redirects more demanding cases to specialists.

title: terveyskeskuslääkäri


text:
haarikko

Noun

 * 1) pearlwort any of several flowering plants of the genus

title: haarikko


text:
heraldikko

Etymology
(see 🇨🇬). Has the derivational suffix.

Noun

 * 1) heraldist expert in or practitioner of heraldry

title: heraldikko


text:
hupakko

Etymology
Probably

Noun

 * 1) promiscuous woman
 * 2) silly person
 * 1) silly person

title: hupakko


text:
informaatikko

Etymology
(see 🇨🇬). Has the derivational suffix.

Noun

 * 1) informaticist, informatician practitioner of informatics

title: informaatikko


text:
jorpakko

Etymology

 * SSA tentatively connects with . "puddle" is the original meaning, and "(the) sea" is sarcastic.

Noun

 * 1) puddle
 * 2) the sea

Derived terms

 * to get lost
 * to get lost

title: jorpakko


text:
kannokko

Noun

 * 1) area containing many tree stumps

title: kannokko


text:
katteikko

Noun

 * 1) a roofed walkway

title: katteikko


text:
katveikko

Noun

 * 1) shade

title: katveikko


text:
kortteikko

Noun

 * 1) ground covered by horsetails

title: kortteikko


text:
lumpeikko

Noun

 * 1) surface of water covered by waterlilies

title: lumpeikko


text:
murrokko

Noun

 * 1)  thicket formed by fallen trees; windbreak

title: murrokko


text:
mättäikkö

Noun

 * 1) ground with many tussocks

title: mättäikkö


text:
ܨܦܬܐ

Etymology 1
From the root related to caring.

Noun

 * 1) care
 * 2) concern, anxiety, worry, solicitude

Noun

 * 1) type of inn

Etymology 3
Suspected to be from, or instead /  / , alleged to be from  but possibly cognate to it. Compare 🇨🇬 and 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) mat, matting

Etymology 4
From. Compare 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) stone, setting (of a ring)

title: ܨܦܬܐ


text:
робиния

Noun

 * , false acacia, black locust

title: робиния


text:
suero de soya

Etymology
lit. 'soy serum'.

Noun

 * 1) whey

title: suero de soya


text: sueros de soya

title: sueros de soya


text:
e/o

Conjunction

 * 1) and/or

title: e/o


text:
rabbit fever

Etymology
Rabbits are a common vector for.

Noun

 * 1)  tularemia

title: rabbit fever


text:
trabaccolo

Noun

 * 1) A kind of two-masted Adriatic Sea sailing coaster.

Etymology
Part of a family of related words used around and near the Adriatic, often dropping the last syllable. Compare 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬 (short form), 🇨🇬 (long form).

Noun

 * 1) a small, two-masted sailing vessel

title: trabaccolo


text:
Pahvant Valley plague

Noun

 * 1)  tularemia

title: Pahvant Valley plague


text:
Ohara's fever

Noun

 * 1)  tularemia

title: Ohara's fever


text:
traballamento

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) staggering, tottering, lurching, reeling, hobble (of a person)
 * 2) wobbling (of an object)

title: traballamento


text:
deer fly fever

Noun

 * 1)  tularemia

title: deer fly fever


text:
traballio

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) staggering, tottering, lurching, reeling (of a person)
 * 2) lurching, shaking (of an object)

title: traballio


text:
trabeazione

Noun

 * 1)  trabeation, entablature

title: trabeazione


text:
traboccamento

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) overflowing, flush

title: traboccamento


text:
lardy cake

Noun

 * 1) A traditional, richly spiced type of bread originating in southwest England made with rendered lard, flour, sugar, spices, currants and raisins.

Translations

 * Chinese:
 * Mandarin:
 * Danish:
 * Finnish: laardikakku
 * Portuguese:
 * Russian:

title: lardy cake


text: traccagnotto

title: traccagnotto


text: sociograms

title: sociograms


text:
nonvaccinating

Adjective

 * 1) Not giving a vaccine.

title: nonvaccinating


text:
trachite

Noun

 * 1)  trachyte

title: trachite


text:
noncostable

Adjective

 * 1) Not costable.

title: noncostable


text:
uncostable

Adjective

 * 1) Not costable.

title: uncostable


text:
tracimazione

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) overflowing

title: tracimazione


text: high technologies

title: high technologies


text:
tracomatoso

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) trachomatous

title: tracomatoso


text:
sociograph

Noun

 * 1) A sociogram.

title: sociograph


text: sociographs

title: sociographs


text:
tradizionalistico

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) traditionalist, traditionalistic

title: tradizionalistico


text: sociomatrices

title: sociomatrices


text:
traduttivo

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1)  translation

title: traduttivo


text:
costable

Adjective

 * 1) For which a monetary cost may be assessed.

title: costable


text:
stabbable

Adjective

 * 1) Capable of being stabbed.

title: stabbable


text:
traenza

Noun

 * 1) drawing

title: traenza


text:
trafficone

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) schemer, wheeler-dealer

title: trafficone


text:
trafilatore

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) wireworker

title: trafilatore


text:
trafilatrice

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) drawbench (wire drawing machine)

title: trafilatrice


text:
trafittura

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) piercing, transfixion
 * 2) (stab) wound
 * 3) (sharp) pain

title: trafittura


text:
traforatrice

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) boring / drilling machine
 * 2) fretsaw (mechanical)

title: traforatrice


text: zygosporangia

title: zygosporangia


text:
tragediografo

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) tragedian (writer of tragedies)

title: tragediografo


text:
Traiano

Proper noun

 * 1) Trajan

title: Traiano


text:
trainabile

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) pullable, haulable, towable

title: trainabile


text:
tralasciabile

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) omittable

title: tralasciabile


text:
referenční

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1)  reference

title: referenční


text: tralignando

title: tralignando


text: tralignante

title: tralignante


text: tralignato

title: tralignato


text: tralignati

title: tralignati


text: tralignata

title: tralignata


text:
tralignare

Verb

 * 1) to degenerate or deteriorate
 * 2)  to become wild, savage or uncultured

title: tralignare


text: traligno

title: traligno


text: traligni

title: traligni


text: traligna

title: traligna


text: traligniamo

title: traligniamo


text: tralignate

title: tralignate


text: tralignano

title: tralignano


text: tralignavo

title: tralignavo


text: tralignavi

title: tralignavi


text: tralignava

title: tralignava


text: tralignavamo

title: tralignavamo


text: tralignavate

title: tralignavate


text: tralignavano

title: tralignavano


text: tralignai

title: tralignai


text: tralignasti

title: tralignasti


text: tralignò

title: tralignò


text: tralignammo

title: tralignammo


text: tralignaste

title: tralignaste


text: tralignarono

title: tralignarono


text: tralignerò

title: tralignerò


text: tralignerai

title: tralignerai


text: tralignerà

title: tralignerà


text: traligneremo

title: traligneremo


text: tralignerete

title: tralignerete


text: traligneranno

title: traligneranno


text: tralignerei

title: tralignerei


text: traligneresti

title: traligneresti


text: tralignerebbe

title: tralignerebbe


text: traligneremmo

title: traligneremmo


text: tralignereste

title: tralignereste


text: tralignerebbero

title: tralignerebbero


text: traligniate

title: traligniate


text: tralignino

title: tralignino


text: tralignassi

title: tralignassi


text: tralignasse

title: tralignasse


text: tralignassimo

title: tralignassimo


text: tralignassero

title: tralignassero


text:
trallallà

Interjection

 * 1) tra-la-la

title: trallallà


text:
inferenční

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1)  inference

title: inferenční


text:
chʼiyąʼ

Noun

 * 1) possessed form of

title: chʼiyąʼ


text:
chidí bijéí

Noun

 * 1) automotive battery

title: chidí bijéí


text:
tra-la-la

Translations

 * Catalan: taral·larà
 * Finnish: lallalaa
 * Galician: tralalá, tralalelo
 * Greek: τήνελλα
 * Italian: trallallà, trallallero
 * Kazakh: ла-ла-ла
 * Spanish: tralará
 * Swedish: tralala

title: tra-la-la


text:
trallallero

Interjection

 * 1) tra-la-la

title: trallallero


text:
tramaglio

Noun

 * 1) trammel (net)

title: tramaglio


text: tramestando

title: tramestando


text: tramestante

title: tramestante


text: tramestato

title: tramestato


text: tramestati

title: tramestati


text:
tramestare

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to mix together, to shuffle, to discombobulate
 * 2)  to rummage
 * 3)  to busy oneself

title: tramestare


text: tramestata

title: tramestata


text: tramesto

title: tramesto


text: tramesti

title: tramesti


text: tramesta

title: tramesta


text: tramestiamo

title: tramestiamo


text: tramestate

title: tramestate


text: tramestano

title: tramestano


text: tramestavo

title: tramestavo


text: tramestavi

title: tramestavi


text: tramestava

title: tramestava


text: tramestavamo

title: tramestavamo


text: tramestavate

title: tramestavate


text: tramestavano

title: tramestavano


text: tramestai

title: tramestai


text: tramestasti

title: tramestasti


text: tramestò

title: tramestò


text: tramestammo

title: tramestammo


text: tramestaste

title: tramestaste


text: tramestarono

title: tramestarono


text: tramesterò

title: tramesterò


text: tramesterai

title: tramesterai


text: tramesterà

title: tramesterà


text: tramesteremo

title: tramesteremo


text: tramesterete

title: tramesterete


text: tramesteranno

title: tramesteranno


text: tramesterei

title: tramesterei


text: tramesteresti

title: tramesteresti


text: tramesterebbe

title: tramesterebbe


text: tramesteremmo

title: tramesteremmo


text: tramestereste

title: tramestereste


text: tramesterebbero

title: tramesterebbero


text: tramestiate

title: tramestiate


text: tramestino

title: tramestino


text: tramestassi

title: tramestassi


text: tramestasse

title: tramestasse


text: tramestassimo

title: tramestassimo


text: tramestassero

title: tramestassero


text:
tramoggia

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) hopper
 * 2) hopper crystal

title: tramoggia


text:
yinishyé

Verb

 * 1) my name is
 * Kii yinishyé — my name is Kii
 * Shí éí Kii yinishyé — my name is Kii

title: yinishyé


text:
hopper crystal

Noun

 * 1)  A mineral crystal whose interior space is empty

Translations

 * Italian:

title: hopper crystal


text:
wááshindoon bikin

Noun

 * 1) capital, capital city

title: wááshindoon bikin


text:
tramvia

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) tram, trolley

title: tramvia


text:
tranciatore

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) shearer

title: tranciatore


text:
tranciatrice

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) shearing machine

title: tranciatrice


text:
wolyé

Etymology
.

Verb

 * 1) he/she/it is called, his/her name is
 * 2) it means
 * 1) it means
 * 1) it means
 * 1) it means
 * 1) it means

Conjugation
.

title: wolyé


text:
trangugiamento

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) gulping

title: trangugiamento


text: Template:list:sexual orientations/nb

title: Template:list:sexual orientations/nb


text:
tranvai

Etymology
A local adaptation of.

Noun

 * 1) tram, streetcar, trolley

title: tranvai


text:
seksuell orientering

Noun

 * 1) sexual orientation

Noun

 * 1) sexual orientation

title: seksuell orientering


text:
tsisteeł

Noun

 * 1) turtle, tortoise

title: tsisteeł


text: water melons

title: water melons


text:
trapiantatrice

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) transplanting machine

title: trapiantatrice


text:
trapuntare

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to quilt
 * 2)  to embroider, to stitch
 * 3)  to bind (covering, padding, etc.) by sewing together
 * 1)  to bind (covering, padding, etc.) by sewing together
 * 1)  to bind (covering, padding, etc.) by sewing together

title: trapuntare


text: trapuntando

title: trapuntando


text: trapuntante

title: trapuntante


text: trapuntiamo

title: trapuntiamo


text: trapuntano

title: trapuntano


text: trapuntavo

title: trapuntavo


text: trapuntavi

title: trapuntavi


text: trapuntava

title: trapuntava


text: trapuntavamo

title: trapuntavamo


text: trapuntavate

title: trapuntavate


text: trapuntavano

title: trapuntavano


text: trapuntai

title: trapuntai


text: trapuntasti

title: trapuntasti


text: trapuntò

title: trapuntò


text: trapuntammo

title: trapuntammo


text: trapuntaste

title: trapuntaste


text: trapuntarono

title: trapuntarono


text: trapunterò

title: trapunterò


text: trapunterai

title: trapunterai


text: trapunterà

title: trapunterà


text: trapunteremo

title: trapunteremo


text: trapunterete

title: trapunterete


text: trapunteranno

title: trapunteranno


text: trapunterei

title: trapunterei


text: trapunteresti

title: trapunteresti


text: trapunterebbe

title: trapunterebbe


text: trapunteremmo

title: trapunteremmo


text: trapuntereste

title: trapuntereste


text: trapunterebbero

title: trapunterebbero


text: trapuntiate

title: trapuntiate


text: trapuntino

title: trapuntino


text: trapuntassi

title: trapuntassi


text: trapuntasse

title: trapuntasse


text: trapuntassimo

title: trapuntassimo


text: trapuntassero

title: trapuntassero


text:
glimp

Noun

 * 1) glimpse
 * 2) deceptive appearance

title: glimp


text:
pangéen

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) Pangaean

title: pangéen


text:
protistologue

Noun

 * 1) protistologist

title: protistologue


text:
mancuerna

Noun

 * 1)  dumbbell
 * 2)  close associate, partner in crime

title: mancuerna


text:
protistologique

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) protistological

title: protistologique


text:
trasformismo

Noun

 * 1)  The method of making a flexible centrist coalition of government which isolated the extremes of the political left and the political right in Italian politics after Italian unification and before the rise of  and Italian fascism.

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) transformism

title: trasformismo


text:
trasformistico

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) transformistic
 * 2)  transformation

title: trasformistico


text: trasmodando

title: trasmodando


text: trasmodante

title: trasmodante


text:
trasmodare

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to go too far

title: trasmodare


text: trasmodato

title: trasmodato


text: trasmodati

title: trasmodati


text: trasmodata

title: trasmodata


text: trasmodo

title: trasmodo


text: trasmodi

title: trasmodi


text: trasmoda

title: trasmoda


text: trasmodiamo

title: trasmodiamo


text: trasmodate

title: trasmodate


text: trasmodano

title: trasmodano


text: trasmodavo

title: trasmodavo


text: trasmodavi

title: trasmodavi


text: trasmodava

title: trasmodava


text: trasmodavamo

title: trasmodavamo


text: trasmodavate

title: trasmodavate


text: trasmodavano

title: trasmodavano


text: trasmodai

title: trasmodai


text: trasmodasti

title: trasmodasti


text: trasmodò

title: trasmodò


text: trasmodammo

title: trasmodammo


text: trasmodaste

title: trasmodaste


text: trasmodarono

title: trasmodarono


text: trasmoderò

title: trasmoderò


text: trasmoderai

title: trasmoderai


text: trasmoderà

title: trasmoderà


text: trasmoderemo

title: trasmoderemo


text: trasmoderete

title: trasmoderete


text: trasmoderanno

title: trasmoderanno


text: trasmoderei

title: trasmoderei


text: trasmoderesti

title: trasmoderesti


text: trasmoderebbe

title: trasmoderebbe


text: trasmoderemmo

title: trasmoderemmo


text: trasmodereste

title: trasmodereste


text: trasmoderebbero

title: trasmoderebbero


text: trasmodiate

title: trasmodiate


text: trasmodino

title: trasmodino


text: trasmodassi

title: trasmodassi


text: trasmodasse

title: trasmodasse


text: trasmodassimo

title: trasmodassimo


text: trasmodassero

title: trasmodassero


text:
trastullatore

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) amuser

title: trastullatore


text: trasumanando

title: trasumanando


text: trasumanante

title: trasumanante


text:
trasumanare

Verb

 * 1)  to transcend human nature

title: trasumanare


text: trasumanato

title: trasumanato


text: trasumanati

title: trasumanati


text: trasumanata

title: trasumanata


text: trasumano

title: trasumano


text: trasumani

title: trasumani


text: trasumana

title: trasumana


text: trasumaniamo

title: trasumaniamo


text: trasumanate

title: trasumanate


text: trasumanano

title: trasumanano


text: trasumanavo

title: trasumanavo


text: trasumanavi

title: trasumanavi


text: trasumanava

title: trasumanava


text: trasumanavamo

title: trasumanavamo


text: trasumanavate

title: trasumanavate


text: trasumanavano

title: trasumanavano


text: trasumanai

title: trasumanai


text: trasumanasti

title: trasumanasti


text: trasumanò

title: trasumanò


text: trasumanammo

title: trasumanammo


text: trasumanaste

title: trasumanaste


text: trasumanarono

title: trasumanarono


text: trasumanerò

title: trasumanerò


text: trasumanerai

title: trasumanerai


text: trasumanerà

title: trasumanerà


text: trasumaneremo

title: trasumaneremo


text: trasumanerete

title: trasumanerete


text: trasumaneranno

title: trasumaneranno


text: trasumanerei

title: trasumanerei


text: trasumaneresti

title: trasumaneresti


text: trasumanerebbe

title: trasumanerebbe


text: trasumaneremmo

title: trasumaneremmo


text: trasumanereste

title: trasumanereste


text: trasumanerebbero

title: trasumanerebbero


text:
trasumanazione

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) transhumanation

title: trasumanazione


text: trasumaniate

title: trasumaniate


text: trasumanino

title: trasumanino


text: trasumanassi

title: trasumanassi


text: trasumanasse

title: trasumanasse


text: trasumanassimo

title: trasumanassimo


text: trasumanassero

title: trasumanassero


text:
trasversalismo

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) bipartisanship

title: trasversalismo


text:
trattatista

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) writer of a treatise

title: trattatista


text:
tratteggiamento

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) tracing
 * 2) outline, sketch

title: tratteggiamento


text:
trattorista

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) tractor driver

title: trattorista


text:
trattrice

Noun

 * 1)  tractrix
 * 2) tractor

title: trattrice


text:
trattura

Noun

 * 1) silk reeling

title: trattura


text:
tratturo

Etymology
, from, from , whence.

Noun

 * 1) sheep track, commonly found in Southern Italy

title: tratturo


text:
travasamento

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) decanting; pouring (out)

title: travasamento


text:
travasatrice

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) transfer pump (in wine making)

title: travasatrice


text:
travata

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to trot

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) (small) girder

title: travata


text:
travet

Noun

 * 1) pen pusher (minor clerk)

title: travet


text:
lar gibbon

Noun

 * 1) A primate in the  family,, with black or brown fur and white hands and feet.

Translations

 * Chinese:
 * Mandarin: 白掌長臂猿
 * Danish:
 * Finnish:
 * Polish: gibon białoręki,
 * Portuguese:
 * Russian: белору́кий гиббо́н,

title: lar gibbon


text:
white-handed gibbon

Noun

 * 1) A lar gibbon.

title: white-handed gibbon


text:
travolgimento

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) overwhelming, overturning

title: travolgimento


text: trabaccoli

title: trabaccoli


text: traballamenti

title: traballamenti


text: traballii

title: traballii


text: trabeazioni

title: trabeazioni


text: traboccamenti

title: traboccamenti


text: trachiti

title: trachiti


text: tracimazioni

title: tracimazioni


text: traenze

title: traenze


text: trafficoni

title: trafficoni


text: trafilatori

title: trafilatori


text: trafilatrici

title: trafilatrici


text: trafitture

title: trafitture


text: traforatrici

title: traforatrici


text: tragediografi

title: tragediografi


text: tramagli

title: tramagli


text: tramogge

title: tramogge


text: tramvie

title: tramvie


text: traccagnotta

title: traccagnotta


text: tranciatori

title: tranciatori


text: traccagnotti

title: traccagnotti


text: tranciatrici

title: tranciatrici


text: traccagnotte

title: traccagnotte


text: trangugiamenti

title: trangugiamenti


text: trapiantatrici

title: trapiantatrici


text: tracomatosa

title: tracomatosa


text: trasformismi

title: trasformismi


text: tracomatosi

title: tracomatosi


text: trastullatori

title: trastullatori


text: tracomatose

title: tracomatose


text: trasumanazioni

title: trasumanazioni


text: tradizionalistica

title: tradizionalistica


text: trasversalismi

title: trasversalismi


text: tradizionalistici

title: tradizionalistici


text: trattatisti

title: trattatisti


text: trattatiste

title: trattatiste


text: tradizionalistiche

title: tradizionalistiche


text: tratteggiamenti

title: tratteggiamenti


text: trattoristi

title: trattoristi


text: traduttiva

title: traduttiva


text: trattoriste

title: trattoriste


text: trattrici

title: trattrici


text: traduttivi

title: traduttivi


text: tratture

title: tratture


text: traduttive

title: traduttive


text: tratturi

title: tratturi


text: trainabili

title: trainabili


text: travasamenti

title: travasamenti


text: travasatrici

title: travasatrici


text: tralasciabili

title: tralasciabili


text: travate

title: travate


text: trasformistica

title: trasformistica


text: trasformistici

title: trasformistici


text: travolgimenti

title: travolgimenti


text: trasformistiche

title: trasformistiche


text: poudreries

title: poudreries


text: insomniaques

title: insomniaques


text: encombrements

title: encombrements


text: dialysats

title: dialysats


text: ponctions

title: ponctions


text: protistologues

title: protistologues


text: lithosphériques

title: lithosphériques


text: protistologiques

title: protistologiques


text: périveineuse

title: périveineuse


text: périveineuses

title: périveineuses


text: veineuses

title: veineuses


text:
lägga rabarber på

Etymology
Humorous corruption of with the similar sounding. First attested in the satirical publication Nya Nisse, 1893.

Verb

 * 1)  To appropriate something; to get one's hands on something.

title: lägga rabarber på


text:
いらっしゃいませ

Etymology
🇰🇲.

Compare.

Interjection

 * 1) welcome
 * 2) please come on in

Usage notes

 * Used by a store person to greet a customer, similarly to "hello, may I help you?"

title: いらっしゃいませ


text: irasshaimase

title: irasshaimase


text:
tʼąąʼ

Particle

 * 1) back (motion), backward

title: tʼąąʼ


text:
tʼáá hó

Pronoun

 * 1) himself/herself/itself/themselves/oneself
 * 2) he himself, she herself, etc.

title: tʼáá hó


text:
tádídíín

Noun

 * 1) corn pollen

Usage notes
Corn pollen is a pillar of traditional Navajo culture. It can only be collected from the tassels of a mature corn plant by a woman. After it is collected, it is blessed and is then used as the primary means of communicating with the myriad Diyin Dineʼé (Navajo Holy People). It assures a traveler safety and happiness, especially when traveling outside of the Navajo homeland. Corn pollen is a sweet-tasting yellow powder that is commonly kept in small leather pouches.

title: tádídíín


text:
táłkááʼ dilwoʼí

Etymology
+ +

Noun

 * 1) water strider

title: táłkááʼ dilwoʼí


text:
táłtłʼááh chʼosh

Noun

 * 1) diving beetle

title: táłtłʼááh chʼosh


text:
taʼneeskʼání áłtsʼóózígíí

Etymology
+ +

Noun

 * 1) cucumber

title: taʼneeskʼání áłtsʼóózígíí


text:
táłtłʼááh chʼosh ntsxaaígíí

Noun

 * 1) Japanese spider crab

title: táłtłʼááh chʼosh ntsxaaígíí


text:
táłtłʼááh chʼoshtsoh bideeneezí

Noun

 * 1) spiny lobster, rock lobster

title: táłtłʼááh chʼoshtsoh bideeneezí


text:
táłtłʼááh chʼoshtsoh bideeteelí

Noun

 * 1) slipper lobster

title: táłtłʼááh chʼoshtsoh bideeteelí


text:
tłʼízí bighaaʼ

Noun

 * 1) goat's wool

title: tłʼízí bighaaʼ


text:
tłʼóoʼdi

Adverb

 * 1) (at) the outside, outdoors

title: tłʼóoʼdi


text:
tó łichxíʼí

Etymology
+ +

Noun

 * 1) soda pop
 * 2) wine

title: tó łichxíʼí


text:
tó łikaní

Etymology
+ +

Noun

 * 1) soda pop
 * 2) wine

title: tó łikaní


text:
tooh nílíní

Etymology
+ +

Noun

 * 1) river

title: tooh nílíní


text:
táłkááʼ naalzheehí

Etymology
+ +

Noun

 * 1) osprey

title: táłkááʼ naalzheehí


text:
tsáʼásziʼtsʼóóz

Noun

 * 1) a type of soapweed, Yucca glauca
 * 2) Yucca angustissima

title: tsáʼásziʼtsʼóóz


text:
konvenční

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) conventional

title: konvenční


text:
trecentista

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) fourteenth-century writer or artist
 * 2) scholar of fourteenth-century literature or art

title: trecentista


text:
tsé dootłʼizh

Noun

 * 1) olivine
 * 2) peridot

title: tsé dootłʼizh


text:
tredicista

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) pools winner

title: tredicista


text:
tséʼédǫ́ʼii

Noun

 * 1) housefly, stable fly

title: tséʼédǫ́ʼii


text:
Segundo

Etymology
Borrowed from ; this surname is predominantly found in Mexico.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Segundo is the 10237th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 3148 individuals. Segundo is most common among Hispanic/Latino (87.17%) individuals.

Etymology
From.

Etymology
From (see the usage note).

Usage notes

 * Used as a middle name to mean "the Second", as in, e.g.,.

title: Segundo


text:
trefolo

Noun

 * 1) strand (of yarn)
 * 2) cable (in prestressed concrete)

title: trefolo


text:
nimikko

Noun

 * 1) One that is named after somebody or something.

title: nimikko


text:
palpakko

Etymology
for Flora Fennica (1860). , where the initial part is re-extracted from (attested in  (1850) by ; + ). The root could be akin to 🇨🇬,, possibly of origin (compare ).

Noun

 * 1) bur-reed plant of the genus

title: palpakko


text:
tregenda

Etymology
Via a dialect or language from Northern Italy, from, from. Cf. also dialectal,.

Noun

 * 1) sabbat, witches' Sabbath
 * 2)  pandemonium, uproar
 * 3) misadventure, mishap
 * 4)  path, track
 * 1) misadventure, mishap
 * 2)  path, track
 * 1)  path, track

title: tregenda


text:
pehmeikkö

Noun

 * 1) soft ground

title: pehmeikkö


text:
trematoda

Noun

 * 1) trematode

title: trematoda


text:
厳し

Adjective

 * 1) the way in which something is tightly packed or close together without gaps
 * 2) * c. 790: Daihannya-kyō Ongi (Ishiyamadera manuscript, page 33)
 * "ja"

- 稠密 [...] 倭言伎比之

title: 厳し


text: punakko

title: punakko


text:
tremillesimo

Adjective

 * 1)  three-thousandth

Noun

 * 1)  three-thousandth

title: tremillesimo


text:
pylväikkö

Noun

 * 1) colonnade

title: pylväikkö


text:
trenaggio

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) haulage

title: trenaggio