text: oreophilum

title: oreophilum


text: oreophili

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: oreophili


text: oreophilae

title: oreophilae


text: oreophilorum

title: oreophilorum


text: oreophilarum

title: oreophilarum


text: ufoene

title: ufoene


text: oreophilo

title: oreophilo


text: oreophilis

title: oreophilis


text: oreophilam

title: oreophilam


text: oreophilos

title: oreophilos


text: oreophilas

title: oreophilas


text: oreophile

title: oreophile


text:
kirkii

Etymology
Named in a pseudo-Latin manner for any of several naturalists named Kirk.

Adjective

 * 1) Kirk (attributive); used in taxonomic names for organisms that often have English names of the form "Kirk's ..."

title: kirkii


text:
brownii

Etymology
Named in a pseudo-Latin manner for any of several naturalists named Brown.

Adjective

 * 1) Brown (attributive); used in taxonomic names for organisms that often have English names of the form "Brown's ..."

title: brownii


text:
steindachneri

Etymology
Named in a pseudo-Latin manner for Austrian zoologist Franz Steindachner

Adjective

 * 1) Steindachner (attributive); used in taxonomic names for organisms that often have English names of the form "Steindachner's ..."

title: steindachneri


text:
ledermannii

Etymology
Named in a pseudo-Latin manner for any of several naturalists named Ledermann.

Adjective

 * 1) Ledermann (attributive); used in taxonomic names for organisms that often have English names of the form "Ledermann's ..."

title: ledermannii


text:
застревать

Verb

 * 1) to become stuck

title: застревать


text: CHT

title: CHT


text:
چر

Etymology 1
Compare.

Adverb

 * 1)  why

title: چر


text:
matkustajakoti

Noun

 * 1) inn establishment where travellers can procure lodging, often also food and drink; cheaper and more modest than a hotel

title: matkustajakoti


text:
matkakoti

Noun

 * 1) inn establishment where travellers can procure lodging, often also food and drink; cheaper and more modest than a hotel

title: matkakoti


text:
retkeilymaja

Noun

 * 1) hostel, youth hostel establishment where travellers can procure lodging, often also food and drink; cheaper and more modest than an inn or a hotel

title: retkeilymaja


text: pet peeves

title: pet peeves


text:
vierasmaja

Noun

 * 1) guesthouse separate small house to lodge guests, private or paying ones
 * 2) xenodochium guesthouse of a monastery

title: vierasmaja


text:
vierastalo

Noun

 * 1) guesthouse separate house to lodge guests, private or paying ones

title: vierastalo


text:
třípětinový

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1)  three-fifths

title: třípětinový


text: Category:Venetian Italian

title: Category:Venetian Italian


text:
dvoutřetinový

Etymology
From, on the basis of.

Adjective

 * 1)  two-thirds

title: dvoutřetinový


text:
čtyřpětinový

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1)  four-fifths

title: čtyřpětinový


text:
dvoupětinový

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1)  two-fifths

title: dvoupětinový


title: Template:el-decl-adj-ης-ης-ες-3


text:
Template:el-decl-adj-ης-ης-ες-3/documentation

For the irregular paroxytone adjectives in ης, with oxytone gentive plural forms in the pattern:

 * Syntax and output for :
 *


text:
Category:Greek adjectives in declension ης-ης-ες-3

el:Κατηγορία:Επίθετα που κλίνονται όπως το 'μανιώδης' (νέα ελληνικά)


text: 发脾气

title: 发脾气


text:
發脾氣

Verb

 * 1) to lose one's temper; to get into a huff; to throw a tantrum

title: 發脾氣


text:
brýlový

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1)  glasses, spectacles

title: brýlový


text:
Talk:merchant

Is it mertshant or merkant? Please add the IPA. --94.76.52.12 11:04, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Done. Mglovesfun (talk) 11:18, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Extended senses
There are extended senses in modern business use that ought to be included here. I'm not sure if you'd add a separate adjective lemma or consider these attributive uses of the noun.
 * As of an unregulated, open market service or commodity that normally is, or used to be, highly regulated: merchant transmission, merchant generation (in the electric and telecommunications utilities industries)
 * As of a formerly vertically integrated manufacturing process that has been disaggregated: merchant silicon (in the electronics industry, referring both to the general outsourcing of integrated circuit manufacturing and the more specific replacement of proprietary devices with third-party commodity ICs)
 * 207.180.169.36 22:10, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:merchant


text:
客廳

Noun

 * 1) living room; sitting room; drawing room

title: 客廳


text: showet

title: showet


text: showa

title: showa


text:
User talk:Priios

mater
Hi, you've probably noticed that Appendix:Proto-Indo-European/méh₂tēr whilst Appendix:Proto-Indo-European/mātēr dosn't. Furthermore the Spanish Wiktionary uses the same title. If anything, you should propose Appendix:Proto-Indo-European/méh₂tēr at WT:Requests for moves, mergers and splits, where I predict it will fail and keep the same title. Mglovesfun (talk) 11:34, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

title: User talk:Priios


text: showene

title: showene


text: sempervirentes

title: sempervirentes


text: sempervirentia

title: sempervirentia


text: sempervirentis

title: sempervirentis


text: sempervirentium

title: sempervirentium


text: sempervirenti

title: sempervirenti


text: sempervirentibus

title: sempervirentibus


text: sempervirentem

title: sempervirentem


text:
Talk:nya

Nya or nyā?
I read:
 * Interjection
 * nya (hiragana にゃあ)

The hiragana for nya should be にゃ and the romanization for にゃあ should be nyā with a macron. I didn’t find how to correct that.

Tohuvabohuo 11:58, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for pointing that out Tohuvabohuo. It appears to me that the whole section was created in error.  It belongs at nyā, which I just created, and besides that I think it's actually an adverb, not an interjection.  にゃにゃ appears to be an option too, but I can't find just にゃ.  If you have any questions about editing Japanese, feel free to ask me.  This site needs more editors of Japanese entries.  --Haplology (talk) 05:13, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

title: Talk:nya


text:
flavovirens

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) yellow-green

title: flavovirens


text: flavovirentes

title: flavovirentes


text: flavovirentia

title: flavovirentia


text: flavovirentis

title: flavovirentis


text: flavovirentium

title: flavovirentium


text: flavovirenti

title: flavovirenti


text: flavovirentibus

title: flavovirentibus


text: flavovirentem

title: flavovirentem


text:
laetevirens

Etymology
From +.

Adjective

 * 1) having luxuriant foliage

title: laetevirens


text: laetevirentes

title: laetevirentes


text: laetevirentia

title: laetevirentia


text: laetevirentis

title: laetevirentis


text: laetevirentium

title: laetevirentium


text: laetevirenti

title: laetevirenti


text: laetevirentibus

title: laetevirentibus


text: laetevirentem

title: laetevirentem


text: polyanthum

title: polyanthum


text: polyanthi

title: polyanthi


text: polyanthae

title: polyanthae


text: polyanthorum

title: polyanthorum


text: polyantharum

title: polyantharum


text: polyantho

title: polyantho


text: polyanthis

title: polyanthis


text: polyantham

title: polyantham


text: polyanthos

title: polyanthos


text:
polyanthe

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) polyanthous

title: polyanthe


text:
Template:el-decl-adj-ής-ιά-ί/documentation

For oxytone adjectives in ης with the pattern:

 * Syntax and output for :
 *


text:
wurdackii

Etymology
Named in a pseudo-Latin manner for any of several naturalists named Wurdack.

Noun

 * 1) Wurdack (attributive); used in taxonomic names for organisms that often have English names of the form "Wurdack's ..."

title: wurdackii


text:
laurifolius

Etymology
New Latin; from.

Adjective

 * 1)  laurel-leafed

title: laurifolius


text: laurifolia

title: laurifolia


text: laurifolium

title: laurifolium


text: laurifolii

title: laurifolii


text: laurifoliae

title: laurifoliae


text: laurifoliorum

title: laurifoliorum


text: laurifoliarum

title: laurifoliarum


text: laurifolio

title: laurifolio


text: laurifoliis

title: laurifoliis


text: laurifoliam

title: laurifoliam


text: laurifolios

title: laurifolios


text: laurifolias

title: laurifolias


text: laurifolie

title: laurifolie


text: malabarica

title: malabarica


text: malabaricum

title: malabaricum


text: malabarici

title: malabarici


text: malabaricae

title: malabaricae


text: malabaricorum

title: malabaricorum


text: malabaricarum

title: malabaricarum


text: malabarico

title: malabarico


text: malabaricis

title: malabaricis


text: malabaricam

title: malabaricam


text: malabaricos

title: malabaricos


text: malabaricas

title: malabaricas


text: malabarice

title: malabarice


text:
pierrei

Etymology
Named in a pseudo-Latin manner for any of several naturalists named Pierre, but especially French botanist Jean Baptiste Louis Pierre.

Adjective

 * 1) Pierre (attributive); used in taxonomic names for organisms that often have English names of the form "Pierre's ..."

title: pierrei


text:
helligdag

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) holiday day on which a festival, etc, is traditionally observed
 * 2) holiday day declared free from work by the government
 * 3) holiday unintentional gap

Noun

 * 1) holiday

title: helligdag


text:
sarasinorum

Etymology
Named in a pseudo-Latin manner for any of several naturalists named Sarasin, but especially the Swiss naturalists Fritz Sarasin and Paul Sarasin.

Adjective

 * 1) Sarasin (attributive); used in taxonomic names for organisms that often have English names of the form "Sarasin's ..."

title: sarasinorum


text:
hellig

Etymology
From, from.

Adjective

 * 1)  holy, sacred

Etymology
From, from.

Adjective

 * 1) holy, sacred

Etymology
,, ultimately perhaps from.

Adjective

 * 1)  tired, exhausted

Etymology 1
From, from , like (🇨🇬) from.

Adjective

 * 1) holy

title: hellig


text:
oppositifolius

Etymology
New Latin; from.

Adjective

 * 1)  Having leaves on opposite sides of the stem; oppositifolious

title: oppositifolius


text: oppositifolia

title: oppositifolia


text: oppositifolium

title: oppositifolium


text: oppositifolii

title: oppositifolii


text: oppositifoliae

title: oppositifoliae


text: oppositifoliorum

title: oppositifoliorum


text: oppositifoliarum

title: oppositifoliarum


text: oppositifolio

title: oppositifolio


text: oppositifoliis

title: oppositifoliis


text: oppositifoliam

title: oppositifoliam


text: oppositifolios

title: oppositifolios


text: oppositifolias

title: oppositifolias


text: oppositifolie

title: oppositifolie


text: bushwalks

title: bushwalks


text:
maingayi

Etymology
Named in a pseudo-Latin manner for the English botanist Alexander Carroll Maingay.

Adjective

 * 1) Maingay (attributive); used in taxonomic names for organisms that often have English names of the form "Maingay's ..."

title: maingayi


text: bushwalked

title: bushwalked


text:
cookii

Etymology
Named in a pseudo-Latin manner for any of several naturalists named Cook.

Adjective

 * 1) Cook (attributive); used in taxonomic names for organisms that often have English names of the form "Cook's ..."

title: cookii


text:
bushwalk

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  A hike; an off-road walk in the countryside, possibly wearing a backpack, undertaken as a leisure activity.

Translations

 * Chinese:
 * Mandarin:

Verb

 * 1)  To undertake an off-road walk in the countryside.
 * 2) * 2008, Alan Murphy, Justin Flynn, Paul Harding, Olivia Pozzan, Queensland & the Great Barrier Reef, Lonely Planet, |%22bushwalking%22+-intitle:%22bushwalking%22+-inauthor:%22%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=hvwbT8rZB4KkiAfE6rzcCw&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=%22bushwalked%22|%22bushwalking%22%20-intitle%3A%22bushwalking%22%20-inauthor%3A%22%22&f=false page 61,
 * Throughout the state you can also go bushwalking in rainforests, camping on isolated tropical islands, horseriding along coastal beaches, and wildlife-spotting in the plethora of national parks and reserves.
 * 1) * 2008, Alan Murphy, Justin Flynn, Paul Harding, Olivia Pozzan, Queensland & the Great Barrier Reef, Lonely Planet, |%22bushwalking%22+-intitle:%22bushwalking%22+-inauthor:%22%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=hvwbT8rZB4KkiAfE6rzcCw&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=%22bushwalked%22|%22bushwalking%22%20-intitle%3A%22bushwalking%22%20-inauthor%3A%22%22&f=false page 61,
 * Throughout the state you can also go bushwalking in rainforests, camping on isolated tropical islands, horseriding along coastal beaches, and wildlife-spotting in the plethora of national parks and reserves.

title: bushwalk


text: qedexe dikim

title: qedexe dikim


text: Quaker guns

title: Quaker guns


text:
Rimanov prostor

Noun

 * 1) Riemann space

title: Rimanov prostor


text:
Риманов простор

Noun

 * 1) Riemann space

title: Риманов простор


text: qedexe dikî

title: qedexe dikî


text: dipejirînim

title: dipejirînim


text: dipejirînî

title: dipejirînî


text: dipejirîne

title: dipejirîne


text: bipejirînim

title: bipejirînim


text: bipejirînî

title: bipejirînî


text: pejirandibim

title: pejirandibim


text: pejirandibî

title: pejirandibî


text: pejirandibe

title: pejirandibe


text: adhraidhean

title: adhraidhean


text:
υπήκοος

Etymology
From, from +.

Noun

 * 1) citizen, national
 * 2) subject
 * 1) subject

title: υπήκοος


text: pejirandiye

title: pejirandiye


text: elimandiye

title: elimandiye


text: bersivandiye

title: bersivandiye


text:
odorífero

Adjective

 * 1) odorous, odoriferous
 * 2) smelly

title: odorífero


text: Template:kmr-conj/hatin

title: Template:kmr-conj/hatin


text: bibersivînim

title: bibersivînim


text: Template:kmr-conj/gotin

title: Template:kmr-conj/gotin


text: Template:kmr-conj/bûn

title: Template:kmr-conj/bûn


text:
Wiktionary:Votes/2012-01/Renaming requests for verification

Renaming requests for verification

 * Voting on: Renaming "Wiktionary:Requests for verification" to "Wiktionary:Requests for attestation", while keeping a redirect after the renaming.
 * Rationale: The name "Requests for verification" is misleading. It is not verification in general that is being requested on that page: neither verification of etymologies nor verification of pronunciation is requested there. What is being requested on the page is "attestation" as defined in WT:CFI.
 * Vote starts: 00:01, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Vote ends: 23.59, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Vote created: Dan Polansky 13:49, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Discussion:
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] Requests_for_moves,_mergers_and_splits, March 2011
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] Wiktionary talk:Votes/2012-01/Renaming requests for verification
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] Beer_parlour, January 2012

Support

 * 1) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support Dan Polansky 07:09, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support --Daniel 10:14, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support —CodeCat 12:28, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support  Ease of understanding is great, only if it doesn't also ease misunderstanding. —Michael Z. 2012-01-30 22:02 z
 * 5) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support I think I may have been the first person to suggest this. Just sayin'. Mglovesfun (talk) 23:00, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support Metaknowledge 02:41, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support -- Cirt (talk) 04:03, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support. There are other ways that a word might be "verified" other than attestation (for example, one might "verify" that podiumward is a "word" having meaning by pointing to the meaning of podium and the common understanding of -ward as a suffix), but the method of verification we require is attestation. bd2412 T 20:59, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Sure, and there are other ways a word might be "attested" other than by providing citations (for example, I might "attest" that I heard someone use it the other day), but the method of attestation that we require is providing citation evidence. < class="latinx" >Ƿidsiþ 12:08, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Nevertheless, "attestation" is more precise than "verification". bd2412 T 20:09, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
 * And it's so precise that it's inappropriate for the proposed rename. --EncycloPetey 05:52, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose This petty change serves only to make Wiktionary's processes more obscure to ordinary users. DCDuring TALK  16:20, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
 * To quote User:Mzajac above "Ease of understanding is great, only if it doesn't also ease misunderstanding." What's your reply to that? Mglovesfun (talk) 16:24, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I give all slogans the respect they deserve. DCDuring TALK 16:27, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
 * How does that reply to Mzajac's statement? Mglovesfun (talk) 16:28, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose   I still prefer Please read the prologue of this page to see what it's all about. -- Liliana • 04:05, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
 * What about a serious justification of your opposing vote? --Dan Polansky 07:55, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I second Dan's question. --Daniel 19:19, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose  —Stephen (Talk) 01:01, 16 February 2012 (UTC) Sometimes it’s not just about attestation. I think I recall when someone put some Navajo words there for verification because he was concerned about missing initial glottal stops. The solution was not attestation (attestation can be problematic for many minority or endangered languages), but explanation. I don’t remember anyone ever having a problem understanding verification in the name of the page. —Stephen (Talk) 01:01, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Missing glottal stops would be for Tea room or Request for cleanup; RFV is for requests for deletion unless attested. If someone was putting them to RFV, he was confused about the scope of the page, and this is one more reason to rename the page. I have seen people confused about what the page is about, including myself. --Dan Polansky 06:41, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The poster did not post the terms to discuss linguistic niceties, he believed they were misspelled and he placed them on the verification page with an aim to having them deleted. It was only in retrospect that it turned out to have been a matter for linguistics. Hindsight, as they say, is 20/20. —Stephen (Talk) 10:04, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
 * If the terms were not misspelled, they should have been attested to meet WT:CFI. If it was obvious that the terms were attested, the nomination should have been closed even without there being citations in the entry. If the terms were unattestable because Navajo itself is poorly attested, then CFI needs to be changed to better suit Navajo. Whatever the case, per CFI, WT:CFI is a standard to be met by all entries in all languages. Maybe I am missing something obvious to you; I can perhaps understand better if you provide links to these Navajo terms and the RFV discussions. --Dan Polansky 12:05, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I already stated that attestation can be problematic for many minority or endangered languages, and it is difficult to find Navajo texts on the Internet. The only good attestation in this case is the word and advice of Navajo linguists and scholars, and that is largely hearsay. I can see that this is going to be another gigantic pointless discussion with you gainsaying everything I write and endlessly repeating yourself. My original statement should have been satisfactory and not required your input, but you have not understood it and haven’t understood my replies. It’s a waste of time to discuss this with you. I oppose it, you can vote any way you like. I know that you always have to have the final word, so I am not going to answer any more of your comments here. —Stephen (Talk) 12:27, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
 * @Stephen your reason for opposing is the same as my reason for supporting. Mglovesfun (talk) 12:35, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose  EncycloPetey 21:21, 22 February 2012 (UTC) WT:RFA points to the administrator page, because "RFA" on Wikipedia is a request for adminship, and we had problems with people getting lost.  Now, I don't advocate doing things simply because of the way Wikipedia does them, but I really don't think we need to introduce that kind of confusion when the existing name has served just fine for many years.  In any case, every entry should meet attestation, so a request to verify that it can be attested makes more sense to me.  Attestation can be handled both at RFV and RFD, just in different ways. --EncycloPetey 21:21, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't see how "attestation can be handled both at RFV and RFD, just in different ways". Attestation is always handled in RFV and never in RFD, from what I have seen, and in any case, attestation is never requested via RFD. Or if I am wrong, then I do not know what you are referring to, that is, how attestation can be handled or requested in RFD. --Dan Polansky 21:46, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm sure you don't see it; that's why you're supporting the vote but I'm not. If you think that attestation is never handled in RfD, then you need to go back and look at some of the entries that were saved there by attestation.  It happens there, even if you haven't seen it.  By the way, you don't have to comment on every vote that you disagree with.  --EncycloPetey 05:51, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] I weakly oppose this. Actually, I have mostly the same sentiments as Ruakh, but feel just strongly enough to oppose. (Frustrating, I know...) - -sche (discuss) 07:21, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Abstain

 * 1) [[Image:Symbol abstain vote.svg|20px]] Abstain  The page isn't for requesting "attestation" (what would that even mean? "Can anyone attest to this?"); but it's not really for requesting "verification", either, except in the convoluted sense that it's for requesting verification that a term meets our so-called "attestation" criteria. I think "Requests for attestation" is a small improvement over "Requests for verification", but not enough of one for me to support. (Actually, it might even be a step backward — I think we should move away from misusing the words "attested" and "attestation" in WT:CFI as well — but again, not enough of one for me to oppose.) —Ruakh TALK 22:59, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Re: "Can anyone attest to this?": Some dictionaries seem to have a requisite sense for "attest", like sense 4 in Collins:attestation and sense 3 in Merriam-Webster:attest. In these senses, evidence or proof attests something (transitively without preposition to) rather than a person attesting to something. This matches the use of the word "attest" by which quotations attest the existence of a term. Just an academic remark. --Dan Polansky 00:13, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Maybe 'Requests for citations'? —CodeCat 00:27, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
 * @CodeCat: That's a good idea, but we have a Category:Requests for quotation for the case when we're explicitly not challenging a sense, and I think "citations" vs. "quotation" is too narrow a distinction to hang this on. Actually, come to think of it, maybe the problem is less with "verification" than with "requests". This isn't a page for requesting that people cite an entry, it's a page for requesting that an entry be deleted for lack of cites (with a grace period to allow that lack to be remedied). A better name might be Disputes of attestation or Challenges of citeability or Requests for deletion/Attestation or something. Or maybe Is this term really used?. ;-)  —Ruakh TALK 16:42, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Is there actually a difference between RFV and RFD? In RFV we assume that citations may be found, and ask for them. In RFD, we assume they won't be found or that the entry doesn't meet CFI in some other way. In both cases, we're verifying the entry against our CFI, so I'm not sure there really needs to be such a clear distinction. RFV and RFD certainly seem to be a subset of a more general kind of check. —CodeCat 13:13, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
 * @Dan Polansky: Thanks, but I don't think that's what we mean by "attestation", either. —Ruakh TALK 16:42, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
 * What we literally mean is Requests for three quotations. We say that a term is “first attested (adj., =“supported, certified, proved”) in a 1902 book.” Isn't it correct to describe that as an attestation (=“evidence, proof”) of the term? The request is to provide three such proofs, so I think Requests for attestation is correct. In any case, we specifically define “attestation,” not “verification,” for our purposes at CFI.
 * Requests for citation, Requests for citations, Requests for citing, Requests for cites, Requests to cite, would be acceptable too. —Michael Z. 2012-02-01 23:26 z
 * None of these alternative names seems inherently more accurate than Requests for attestation, because the whole attestation system is more complex than just finding citations. One example of uncomfortably long but absurdly accurate (but not 100% accurate) name would be Requests for citations from permanently recorded media, conveying meaning, in at least three independent instances spanning at least a year. --Daniel 02:59, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
 * How about Requests for CFI check? -- Liliana • 02:18, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Requests for CFI check and Requests for attestation seem to be equally accurate, since CFI dictates our attestation rules.
 * However, I still prefer the name proposed by Dan Polansky in this voting, because attestation sounds more natural, less technical, less scary. --Daniel 19:16, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
 * "Wiktionary:Requests for CFI check" does not do; CFI is referred to both in RFV and RFD. The two main requirements from CFI--attestation and idiomaticity--are dispatched to RFV and RFD, respectively. Put differently, RFV is not for any and all checks relating to CFI but only for checks relating to attestation. --Dan Polansky 08:23, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh, Dan Polansky is right. --Daniel 08:46, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * When we're at academic corrections: "Wiktionary:Requests for citations from permanently recorded media, conveying meaning, in at least three independent instances spanning at least a year" is not accurate at all, as it only refers to one bullet point out of four bullet points from "attestation" section. Neither does "Wiktionary:Requests for three quotations" work, as the fourth bullet point from WT:ATTEST requires only one attesting quotation. Repeating the whole text of "attestation" section in the title of the page is pointless, especially when the whole text of "attestation" section is naturally referred to by the title given to the section: "attestation". --Dan Polansky 09:05, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) [[Image:Symbol abstain vote.svg|20px]] Abstain Equinox ◑ 22:09, 6 February 2012 (UTC) Doesn't seem like a big deal, but I wouldn't object either. Equinox ◑ 22:09, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) [[Image:Symbol abstain vote.svg|20px]] Abstain < class="latinx" >Ƿidsiþ 21:05, 15 February 2012 (UTC) per Equinox. < class="latinx" >Ƿidsiþ 21:05, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Decision
failed 8-5-3 -- Liliana • 13:57, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
 * That is what we call no consensus, with 61% support, =8 / (8 + 5). (sarcasm) Let the minorities reign supreme, lest they be "oppressed" by the "tyrrany of majority". (end of sarcasm) --Dan Polansky (talk) 14:02, 1 March 2012 (UTC)


text: svem

title: svem


text:
Reconstruction:Proto-Germanic/straumaz

Etymology
From, which is derived from. Cognate with 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1)  stream, current, river

title: Reconstruction:Proto-Germanic/straumaz


text: свем

title: свем