text: స్థానం

title: స్థానం


text: lhibro

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: lhibro


text:
архъуажъ

Noun

 * 1) crocodile

title: архъуажъ


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 黄 read as おう


text:
джэмышх

Noun

 * 1) spoon

Synonyms

 * (Kabardian)
 * (Kabardian)

title: джэмышх


text:
цацэ

Noun

 * 1) fork

Synonyms

 * (Kabardian dialect)

title: цацэ


text:
къамлыбжъ

Noun

 * 1) bowl

title: къамлыбжъ


text:
స్థానభ్రంశము

Noun

 * 1) dislocation

title: స్థానభ్రంశము


text:
пыут

Synonyms

 * (Kabardian)

title: пыут


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 誘 read as ゆう


text:
кӏышъу

Noun

 * 1) skin
 * 2) crust of Earth

title: кӏышъу


text:
fuogo

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) fire

title: fuogo


text:
шъхьацы

Noun

 * 1) hair

title: шъхьацы


text:
куцӏы

Noun

 * 1) brain

title: куцӏы


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 魅 read as み


text:
нэкӏушъу

Noun

 * 1) cheek

title: нэкӏушъу


text:
нэкӏушъхь

Noun

 * 1) cheek

title: нэкӏушъхь


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 迷 read as めい


text:
ӏупшӏэ

Noun

 * 1) jaw

title: ӏупшӏэ


text: жэкӏьапэ

title: жэкӏьапэ


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 勧 read as かん


text:
тхьабыл

Noun

 * 1) lung

title: тхьабыл


text: Category:Saanich proper nouns

title: Category:Saanich proper nouns


text:
cumputador

Noun

 * 1) computer

title: cumputador


text:
кӏэтӏэй

Noun

 * 1) intestine

Synonyms

 * (Shapsug)

title: кӏэтӏэй


text:
лыпцэ

Noun

 * 1) muscle

title: лыпцэ


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 勧 read as すす


text:
зыуӏэшын

Noun

 * 1) arm

title: зыуӏэшын


text:
ӏэнтэгъу

Etymology
From the Circassian root ӏэ /ʔa/ "arm".

Noun

 * 1) elbow

title: ӏэнтэгъу


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with kanji read as すす


text:
ӏапшъ

Noun

 * 1) wrist

title: ӏапшъ


text:
лъэкӏэн

Noun

 * 1) ankle

title: лъэкӏэн


text: Almanha

title: Almanha


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 殺 read as ころ


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with kanji read as ころ


text:
outonho

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) autumn

title: outonho


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 殺 read as さつ


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 惨 read as ざん


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with kanji read as ざん


text:
primabera

Noun

 * 1) spring season

title: primabera


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 惨 read as さん


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with kanji read as さつ


text:
stârc

Etymology
, from. Compare 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, also 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) heron (bird)

title: stârc


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 射 read as しゃ


text:
బుద్ధుడు

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  a wise or learned man, sage, one who is awakened or enlightened.
 * 2) The name is especially applied to Buddha, the founder of Buddhism.

title: బుద్ధుడు


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 彩 read as さい


text:
paç

Etymology
From, accusative singular of.

Noun

 * 1) peace

title: paç


text:
shpëlaj

Etymology
Either a prefixal derivative of or borrowed from, from , from. Compare 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1) to rinse

title: shpëlaj


text: బుద్ధుఁడు

title: బుద్ధుఁడు


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 佳 read as か


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 彩 read as あや


text:
biolento

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) violent

title: biolento


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with kanji read as あや


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 乃 read as の


text:
బౌద్ధము

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) Buddhism.

title: బౌద్ధము


text:
amarielho

Etymology
From, derived from. Compare 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Adjective

 * 1) yellow

Noun

 * 1) yellow

title: amarielho


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 果 read as か


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 夏 read as か


text:
బౌద్ధుడు

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) a Buddhist.

title: బౌద్ధుడు


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 菜 read as な


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 香 read as か


text: బౌద్ధుఁడు

title: బౌద్ధుఁడు


text:
reboluçon

Noun

 * 1) revolution

title: reboluçon


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 虹 read as こう


text:
nubre

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) cloud

title: nubre


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 鱒 read as ます


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 虹 read as にじ


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with kanji read as にじ


text:
trăncăni

Etymology
From, of onomatopoetic origin.

Verb

 * 1) to prattle, babble, talk much (especially without purpose or importance)

title: trăncăni


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with kanji read as ます


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 野 read as の


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 水 read as みず


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with kanji read as みず


text:
Thread:User talk:CodeCat/sort key in Greek headword lines/reply (3)

thanks


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 撥 read as はつ


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 反 read as はん


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 規 read as き


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 定 read as じょう


text:
poid

Noun

 * 1) The curve traced by the centre of a sphere when it rolls or slides over a surface having a sinusoidal profile.

title: poid


text: acuendogli

title: acuendogli


text: acuendola

title: acuendola


text: acuendole

title: acuendole


text: acuendoli

title: acuendoli


text: acuendolo

title: acuendolo


text: acuendone

title: acuendone


text: ancorandogli

title: ancorandogli


text: ancorandola

title: ancorandola


text: ancorandole

title: ancorandole


text: ancorandoli

title: ancorandoli


text: ancorandolo

title: ancorandolo


text: ancorandone

title: ancorandone


text:
deșidera

Etymology
, present active infinitive of. Is now archaic in Romanian. Compare 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1)  to desire, wish or long for

title: deșidera


text:
bertone

Noun

 * 1)  a large, three-masted, square-rigged ship used in the Mediterranean in the 16th and 17th centuries

title: bertone


text:
bocconiano

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) relating to, or graduated from,  in Milan

Noun

 * 1) a student at, or graduate from, Bocconi University

title: bocconiano


text:
Semnopithecus

Etymology
, from +.

Hypernyms

 * ; - superfamily;  - family;  - subfamily

Hyponyms

 * - type species;, , , , , - other species

title: Semnopithecus


text:
calpestamento

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) trampling
 * 2) humiliation, contempt

title: calpestamento


text:
canapicolo

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) relating to the cultivation of hemp

title: canapicolo


text: canapulo

title: canapulo


text:
Pinguicula

Hyponyms

 * - type species; for other species see or

title: Pinguicula


text:
Boswellia

Etymology
After

Hyponyms

 * For species see or

title: Boswellia


text: Pagellus

title: Pagellus


text: giue

title: giue


text:
Elops

Etymology
From.

Hypernyms

 * - subphylum; Gnathostomata - infraphylum; - superclass; Actinopterygii - class;  - subclass; Teleostei - infraclass;  - superorder;  - order;  - family

Hyponyms

 * For species see or

title: Elops


text:
Thread:User talk:CodeCat/French sorting/reply (2)

This reminds me, isn't sorting (last I checked) and often seems not to be even fed with sort keys. Not sure how to fix that one, though.


text:
Template:dsb-decl-pron-59

Declension of the second-person pronouns

¹ Both śi and tebje are used when no preposition precedes, but after a preposition only tebje is used.

title: Template:dsb-decl-pron-59


text:
posiçon

Noun

 * 1) position

title: posiçon


text:
Thread:User talk:CodeCat/French sorting/reply (3)

I fixed it. supports sort keys, but didn't pass the key on to it.


text:
quemun

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) common

title: quemun


text:
coleopterological

Adjective

 * 1) Relating to coleopterology.

title: coleopterological


text: have the world by the testicles

title: have the world by the testicles


text:
User:Adirlanz/common.js

// install Wikipedia:User:Cacycle/wikEd in-browser text editor mw.loader.load('//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Cacycle/wikEd.js' + '&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript');

title: User:Adirlanz/common.js


text:
User:Adirlanz/vector.css

html, body, #globalWrapper{font-family: Georgia, Neuton, Noto Serif, serif, Quivira, DejaVu Sans !important;}

title: User:Adirlanz/vector.css


text:
Talk:Oblomovism

Anyone know how to pronounce this?

title: Talk:Oblomovism


text:
canevazza

Noun

 * 1) rag
 * 2) duster

title: canevazza


text:
չոգամ

Etymology
A secondary post-classical formation based on the aorist stem of.

title: չոգամ


text:
capannella

Noun

 * 1) a pyramid of four walnuts in the game of nocino

title: capannella


text: չոգալ

title: չոգալ


text:
cassoeula

Etymology
, from. , from 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) a Lombard dish made from pork and cabbage

title: cassoeula


text:
buanfasach

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) durable, hard-wearing

title: buanfasach


text:
buanchruthach

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) stereotyped

title: buanchruthach


text:
buanchuimhneach

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) having a long memory

title: buanchuimhneach


text:
ciocorì

Noun

 * 1) a sweet Tuscan snack made from chocolate and puffed rice

title: ciocorì


text:
buanseasmhach

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) persevering, steadfast

title: buanseasmhach


text:
conspóideach

Etymology
.

Adjective

 * 1) argumentative
 * 2) contentious, controversial

title: conspóideach


text:
Category talk:CodeCat's test category2

What purpose
Would be nice to know why these are here; what's the reason or 'error'. Mglovesfun (talk) 21:51, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Who knows? (getting bigger all the time) SemperBlotto (talk) 09:47, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

title: Category talk:CodeCat's test category2


text:
éascaigh

Verb

 * 1) make easy
 * 2) hurry, expedite

title: éascaigh


text:
cancèr

Etymology
Borrowed from.

Noun

 * 1)  cancer

title: cancèr


text: cancèrs

title: cancèrs


text:
Serranus

Hypernyms

 * ; - suborder;  - superfamily;  - family

Hyponyms

 * (comber) - type species; (painted comber) - selected other species; for other species see  or

Proper noun

 * , a Roman consul
 * 1)  A warrior and ally of Turnus
 * 1)  A warrior and ally of Turnus

title: Serranus


text:
cârrosse

Etymology
Compare 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1)  coach

title: cârrosse


text: cârrosses

title: cârrosses


text:
Shikasta Nasta'liq

Etymology
Ultimately from, possibly via.

Proper noun

 * 1) A form of Perso-Arabic script calligraphy used for Persian and Urdu.

Translations

 * Persian: شکسته‌نستعلیق
 * Turkish: kırık nestalik

title: Shikasta Nasta'liq


text: kanarii

title: kanarii


text: kanariojn

title: kanariojn


text:
Rhizobium

Hypernyms

 * - kingdom; - phylum; Alpha Proteobacteria - class;  - order;  - family

Hyponyms

 * For species see or

title: Rhizobium


text: kanarioj

title: kanarioj


text: kanarion

title: kanarion


text: alforge

title: alforge


text:
canârien

Etymology
Compare 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1)  canary

title: canârien


text: canâriens

title: canâriens


text:
violentu

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) violent

Etymology
.

Adjective

 * 1) violent

title: violentu


text:
caûff'thie globale

Noun

 * 1)  global warming

title: caûff'thie globale


text:
nudismu

Noun

 * 1) nudism

title: nudismu


text: Category:nrf:Ecology

title: Category:nrf:Ecology


text: Category:ast:Latin letter names

title: Category:ast:Latin letter names


text: Category:ast:Letter names

title: Category:ast:Letter names


text:
jeûneur

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) someone who fasts, a faster

title: jeûneur


text: Category:de:Ecology

title: Category:de:Ecology


text: jeûneuse

title: jeûneuse


text: jeûneuses

title: jeûneuses


text: jeûneurs

title: jeûneurs


text:
石窟

Noun

 * 1) rock cave; grotto

Noun

 * 1) rock cave

title: 石窟


text:
ayunador

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) that fasts

Noun

 * 1) faster; someone who fasts

title: ayunador


text:
多疑

Adjective

 * 1) distrustful; suspicious; paranoid

title: 多疑


text:
caûffage central

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1)  central heating

title: caûffage central


text:
害羞

Verb

 * 1) to be shy; to be bashful

title: 害羞


text:
pastia

Noun

 * 1) dough
 * 2) pasta

title: pastia


text:
célériac

Etymology
Compare 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1)  celeriac

title: célériac


text:
célérin

Etymology
Considered by de Vries to derive from (see, ). Compare 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1)  gudgeon

title: célérin


text: célérins

title: célérins


text:
chèrfi

Etymology
From or.

Noun

 * 1)  chervil

title: chèrfi


text:
toiro

Etymology
Alteration of.

title: toiro


text:
chèrfi doux

Noun

 * 1)  cicely.

title: chèrfi doux


text:
canichot

Noun

 * 1)  cot

title: canichot


text:
Template:rftranslit/documentation

Usage
Used to tag entries that need transliteration.

It adds the entry to categories such as Category:Requests for transliteration of Arabic terms. It should be placed where the script is needed.

Parameters

 * 1
 * The language code of the term needing transliteration. See List of languages.

 * sort
 * The sort key for the page; rarely needs to be specified.

 * 1
 * Disable categorization of this page.

This template adds the page to the following categories (where LANG is the language whose code is specified using 1):
 * Category:Requests for transliteration of LANG terms

title: Template:rftranslit/documentation


text: canichots

title: canichots


text: netīrumi

title: netīrumi


text:
cigire

Etymology
Coined by (c. 1670 – c. 1752) based on a misreading of  (itself a rare and now obsolete alternative spelling of ) as, expanded by the suffix. Began to see actual use in Irish at the beginning of the 20th century.

Noun

 * 1) inspector
 * 2)  gay man, faggot, poof

title: cigire


text: cigirí

title: cigirí


text: banchigirí

title: banchigirí


text:
chînment'tie

Noun

 * , cement factory

title: chînment'tie


text: chînment'ties

title: chînment'ties


text:
cauchie ès cont'neurs

Noun

 * 1)  container port

title: cauchie ès cont'neurs


text:
c'ti-ci

Pronoun

 * 1) this one

title: c'ti-ci


text:
c'ti-la

Pronoun

 * 1) that one

title: c'ti-la


text: 笸篮

title: 笸篮


text: Category:Gallo pronouns

title: Category:Gallo pronouns


text:
笸籃

Noun

 * 1) wicker basket

title: 笸籃


text:
coutiaou

Etymology
From, from , diminutive of.

Noun

 * 1) knife

title: coutiaou


text:
Template:ast-conj-poder

 * Reference http://www.academiadelallingua.com/diccionariu/normes.pdf

title: Template:ast-conj-poder


text:
d'vantieur'

Noun

 * 1) apron

title: d'vantieur'


text:
Searlean

Adjective

 * 1) Of or relating to  (born 1932), American philosopher.

title: Searlean


text:
Paglian

Adjective

 * 1) Of or relating to  (born 1947), American teacher, feminist, and social critic.

title: Paglian


text:
déjun

Noun

 * 1) breakfast

title: déjun


text:
loscann

Etymology
From (compare 🇨🇬).

Noun

 * 1) frog
 * 2) tadpole

title: loscann


text: dêjeuners

title: dêjeuners


text:
Greenblattian

Adjective

 * 1) Of or relating to  (born 1943), American literary critic, theorist and scholar, regarded as a founder of.

title: Greenblattian


text:
Template:ast-conj-tar

 * Reference: http://www.academiadelallingua.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Gramatica_Llingua.pdf

title: Template:ast-conj-tar


text:
queerphobic

Adjective

 * 1) Having a fear or hatred of queer people.

Translations

 * French: queerphobe
 * German: queerfeindlich

title: queerphobic


text: éigis

title: éigis


text: éigse

title: éigse


text:
éigeas

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) learned man, sage; poet

title: éigeas


text: securocracies

title: securocracies


text:
fartucar

Verb

 * 1) to stuff (with food)

title: fartucar


text:
loscánta

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) amphibious

title: loscánta


text:
chiffonnage

Noun

 * 1) creasing; crumpling

Noun

 * 1)  swindle

title: chiffonnage


text: chiffonnages

title: chiffonnages


text:
demate

Verb

 * 1)  To move (a space shuttle orbiter) off the back of an aircraft that can carry it.

title: demate


text: demated

title: demated


text: demates

title: demates


text: demating

title: demating


text: èrabrévage

title: èrabrévage


text: èrabrévages

title: èrabrévages


text:
Laestadianism

Proper noun

 * 1) A conservative Lutheran revival movement started in the middle of the 19th century, marked by pietistic and Moravian influences, and having many members in the Nordic countries.

title: Laestadianism


text:
féthage

Noun

 * 1) ironing

title: féthage


text: disreputables

title: disreputables


text:
ignominiousness

Noun

 * 1) The state or quality of being ignominious.

title: ignominiousness


text:
rîndelle en fé

Noun

 * 1) metal washer

title: rîndelle en fé


text:
Laestadian

Etymology
From Lars Levi Læstadius, the founder of the movement.

Noun

 * 1) A member of the Laestadianism religious movement.

Translations

 * Finnish:

title: Laestadian


text: Laestadians

title: Laestadians


text: rîndelles en fé

title: rîndelles en fé


text:
ripio

Etymology 1
. Perhaps ultimately from.

Noun

 * 1) gravel
 * 2)  padding, empty word

title: ripio


text:
fouage

Noun

 * 1)  digging

title: fouage


text:
enripiar

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to gravel, add gravel to

title: enripiar


text: Template:zu-rel/documentation

title: Template:zu-rel/documentation


text:
柳樹

Noun

 * 1) willow tree

title: 柳樹


text: 柳树

title: 柳树


text: dacoiting

title: dacoiting


text: dacoited

title: dacoited


text:
fouôrrage

Etymology
From, (compare 🇨🇬), a derivative of , of  origin.

Noun

 * 1)  forage, fodder

title: fouôrrage


text: mulctings

title: mulctings


text:
полировать

Etymology
, which is borrowed from (see modern French ), from.

Verb

 * 1) to polish, to shine, to buff

title: полировать


text: Template:zu-rel

title: Template:zu-rel


text: Template:zu-adj/documentation

title: Template:zu-adj/documentation


text: Template:zu-verb/documentation

title: Template:zu-verb/documentation


text:
beguilable

Adjective

 * 1) Susceptible to being beguiled.

title: beguilable


text:
rapiéchage

Etymology
Compare 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1)  patchwork

title: rapiéchage


text: Template:zu-det/documentation

title: Template:zu-det/documentation


text:
Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/kleh₂-

Root

 * 1) to put
 * 2) to lay out

Derived terms

 * *kléh₂-t ~ *klh₂-én-t
 * ⇒ *kléh₂t-e-ti
 * ⇒ *kléh₂t-tu-s
 * *kléh₂-ye-ti
 * *kléh₂-dʰh₁e-ti
 * *kléh₂-ye-ti
 * *kléh₂-dʰh₁e-ti
 * *kléh₂-dʰh₁e-ti
 * *kléh₂-dʰh₁e-ti
 * *kléh₂-dʰh₁e-ti


text:
têmoignage

Etymology
From (compare 🇨🇬), from.

Noun

 * 1)  testimony, witness

title: têmoignage


text:
wheelclamping

Noun

 * 1) The use of wheel clamps to penalize motorists.
 * Wheelclamping is in operation in this area.

title: wheelclamping


text:
têmoin

Etymology
From, from.

Noun

 * 1)  witness

title: têmoin


text:
multiconstraint

Adjective

 * 1) Of or relating to more than one constraint.

title: multiconstraint


text: человека

title: человека


text:
multiconstrained

Adjective

 * 1) Subject to more than one constraint.

title: multiconstrained


text:
multicampaign

Adjective

 * 1) Of or relating to more than one campaign.

title: multicampaign


text: têmoins

title: têmoins


text:
unarrestable

Adjective

 * 1) Not arrestable.

title: unarrestable


text:
unhaltable

Adjective

 * 1) Not haltable.

title: unhaltable


text:
haltable

Adjective

 * 1) Capable of being halted; stoppable.

title: haltable


text:
uninventable

Adjective

 * 1) That cannot be invented.
 * The professor claimed that a time machine would be uninventable, since nobody can travel faster than the speed of light.

title: uninventable


text:
uninvestable

Adjective

 * 1) That cannot be invested.

title: uninvestable


text:
divestable

Adjective

 * 1) Capable of being divested.

title: divestable


text:
inventable

Adjective

 * 1) Capable of being invented.

title: inventable


text:
שנורקל

Noun

 * 1) snorkel

title: שנורקל


text:
uninvertible

Adjective

 * 1) That cannot be inverted.

title: uninvertible


text:
mediatable

Adjective

 * 1) Capable of being mediated.

title: mediatable


text:
étchuro

Etymology
From (compare 🇨🇬), from Classical.

Noun

 * 1) squirrel

title: étchuro


text:
unmediatable

Adjective

 * 1) Incapable of being mediated.

title: unmediatable


text: שנורקלים

title: שנורקלים


text:
unresolvably

Adverb

 * 1) In a way that cannot be resolved.
 * an unresolvably paradoxical argument

title: unresolvably


text: חצילים

title: חצילים


text:
faeugieur'

Etymology
From (compare 🇨🇬), from.

Noun

 * 1) fern

title: faeugieur'


text:
ŝedo

Noun

 * 1) shed
 * 2) penthouse

title: ŝedo


text:
fien

Etymology 1
From, from , from.

Noun

 * 1) manure, dung

Adjective

 * 1) wet, moist

Etymology
From, from.

Adjective

 * 1) fine like small particles such as sand

title: fien


text: ŝedon

title: ŝedon


text:
Bostrichus

Etymology
From.

Hypernyms

 * ; Dicondylia, Pterygota,, Neoptera, , - clades;  - superorder;  - order; Polyphaga - suborder;  - infraorder;  - superfamily;  - family;  - subfamily;  - tribe

Hyponyms

 * For species see or

title: Bostrichus


text: ŝedoj

title: ŝedoj


text: ŝedojn

title: ŝedojn


text:
finnissement

Noun

 * 1)  ending

title: finnissement


text: finnissements

title: finnissements


text:
avoir le vent en poupe

Etymology
Compare 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1)  to gather steam, to gain popularity, to enjoy increasing success

title: avoir le vent en poupe


text:
Morbillivirus

Etymology
From.

Hypernyms

 * ;  - subfamily

Hyponyms

 * - type species;, , , , , - other species

title: Morbillivirus


text:
franc-machon

Etymology
Either a calque of, or of , itself a calque of the English term.

Noun

 * 1)  Freemason

title: franc-machon


text:
fourchet

Noun

 * 1)  footrot

title: fourchet


text: Category:nrf:Veterinary medicine

title: Category:nrf:Veterinary medicine


text:
avoir de la chance

Verb

 * 1) to be lucky, to be fortunate

title: avoir de la chance


text:
frêlon

Etymology
From, adapted to in the Glosses of Reichenau (compare 🇨🇬).

Noun

 * 1)  hornet

title: frêlon


text: frêlons

title: frêlons


text:
flowers of antimony

Noun

 * 1)  antimony trioxide

title: flowers of antimony


text:
mercury of life

Noun

 * 1)  butter of antimony, antimony trichloride

title: mercury of life


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 帯 read as たい


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 衣 read as い


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 裕 read as ゆ


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 裕 read as ひろ


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 丈 read as たけ


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 丈 read as じょう


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 余 read as よ


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 美 read as み


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 千 read as ち


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 友 read as とも


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with kanji read as とも


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 和 read as かず


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with kanji read as かず


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 哲 read as てつ


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 善 read as よし


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 偽 read as ぎ


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 道 read as みち


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with kanji read as みち


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 入 read as じゅ


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 枝 read as えだ


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with kanji read as えだ


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 章 read as ふみ


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 枝 read as え


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 君 read as きみ


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with kanji read as きみ


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 君 read as くん


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 暴 read as ぼう


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 乱 read as らん


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with kanji read as らん


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 細 read as さい


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 視 read as し


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with kanji read as ふみ


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 些 read as さ


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 末 read as まつ


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with kanji read as まつ


text:
stay hungry

Verb

 * 1)  To maintain a strong motivation to achieve or compete; to avoid complacency.
 * 2) * 2008 May 17, Richard Corliss and Mary Corliss, "Cannes Gets Real" (film review of Tyson), Time (retrieved 8 August 2013) :
 * Tyson was an apt pupil: he obsessively studied old films of boxing legends, learned the spiritual side of the warrior mentality and, he says, "restrained myself from having sex for about five years." . . . But how to stay hungry when you're dining on caviar, sycophancy and willing women?
 * 1) * 2008 May 17, Richard Corliss and Mary Corliss, "Cannes Gets Real" (film review of Tyson), Time (retrieved 8 August 2013) :
 * Tyson was an apt pupil: he obsessively studied old films of boxing legends, learned the spiritual side of the warrior mentality and, he says, "restrained myself from having sex for about five years." . . . But how to stay hungry when you're dining on caviar, sycophancy and willing women?

Usage notes

 * Often used in sporting contexts describing a player's or team's commitment to intense athletic competitiveness.

title: stay hungry


text: Citations:walk of shame

title: Citations:walk of shame


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 内 read as ない


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with kanji read as ない


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 幕 read as ばく


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 文 read as ぶん


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 月 read as げつ


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with kanji read as げつ


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 末 read as すえ


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with kanji read as すえ


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 一 read as かず


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 期 read as ご


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 次 read as つぐ


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with kanji read as つぐ


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 晃 read as こう


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 晃 read as あき


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 正 read as まさ


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 敏 read as とし


text: stop to smell the roses

title: stop to smell the roses


text:
ćosavac

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) a man without a beard and a mustache
 * 2)  a clever man

title: ćosavac


text:
ћосавац

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) a man without a beard and a mustache
 * 2)  a clever man

title: ћосавац


text:
ćosavost

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  the state of not having a beard and a mustache

title: ćosavost


text:
ћосавост

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  the state of not having a beard and a mustache

title: ћосавост


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 久 read as ひさ


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with kanji read as ひさ


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 成 read as なり


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with kanji read as なり


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 拓 read as ひろ


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 政 read as まさ


text: sfârșituri

title: sfârșituri


text:
Reconstruction talk:Proto-Indo-European/bʰardʰéh₂

Celtic forms are not listed as inherited in the literature and need checking. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 04:12, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

I've removed them until someone can check. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 04:24, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

 * Check Kroonen's Etymological Dictionary of Proto-Germanic s. v. *barzda-. He accounts for this etymon quite differently. I find his solution much more satisfying. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 22:59, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

 * Not only Germanic, but 🇨🇬 also points towards an earlier *bʰorsdʰ- < . I should add that the Lithuanian entry is parallel to Slavic (in Lithuanian furrow is ) and that the remaining Balto-Slavic data points towards, probably formed in a similar manner from . I would not discard the possibility that both sigmatic and asigmatic forms existed and that they were sometimes confused for each other in certain languages. It's hard to tell, because the -a- in Italic does not accord with either of these possibilities.

 * In either case, the alternative proposition seems "silly". Its sonority just looks off-hand (especially the sequence aspirated stop + laryngeal + full-grade vowel + trill). Bezimenen (talk) 13:52, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Does the Persian word "balme" really belong here? 5.141.120.250 13:06, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Not likely, but still not impossible.

Wanderword
Here's the talk page you wanted, Victar @“Skiulinamo”. If you looked for more than a second, you'd see that the source I cited states exactly the hypothesis I described. But since you're the self-proclaimed King, that's a lot to ask for. Lovely to see you're back at your old ways. — 24.45.25.54 21:12, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Glad to see you're still at your ways of adding spurious etymologies. =) --Skiulinamo (talk) 21:16, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes, surely irregular correspondences in an areally-distributed word of a semantic class highly prone to borrowing aren't spurious. But a citation from one of the leading linguists in the field who happens to question it, now that's heresy. — 24.45.25.54 21:19, 15 December 2022 (UTC)


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 渉 read as しょう


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 政 read as せい


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 干 read as かん


text:
konkluzo

Noun

 * 1) conclusion, ending

title: konkluzo


text: konkluzi

title: konkluzi


text:
bordus

Etymology
From, from.

Noun

 * 1) beard
 * 2) * Elbing German-Prussian Vocabulary
 * Bart  Bordus

title: bordus


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 二 read as じ


text:
konkluziva

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) conclusive, final, peremptory

title: konkluziva


text:
konkluzar

Verb

 * 1)  to conclude, finish, end, terminate

title: konkluzar


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 路 read as みち


text:
manchegu

Adjective

 * 1) Of or pertaining to La Mancha.

Noun

 * 1) Manchego cheese

title: manchegu


text: Category:ast:Cheeses

title: Category:ast:Cheeses


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 枚 read as まい


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 大 read as ひろ


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 樹 read as き


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 紀 read as のり


text:
feldespatu

Noun

 * 1) feldspar

title: feldespatu


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with kanji read as のり


text: Category:ast:Minerals

title: Category:ast:Minerals


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 良 read as よし


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 智 read as とも


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 篤 read as あつ


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with kanji read as あつ


text:
barzdotas

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) bearded
 * 2)  old
 * 3)  having a fringe resembling a beard in some way
 * 4) * c. 1765-1775, Kristijonas Donelaitis, Metai (The Seasons)
 * "lt"

- Tikt dyvai žiūrėt, kaipo barzdoti pušynai / Su savo kuodais garbanotais visur pasirodo

title: barzdotas


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 義 read as よし


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 広 read as こう


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 永 read as なが


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 広 read as ひろ


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 好 read as よし


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 享 read as きょう


text:
alcontrar

Verb

 * 1) to find
 * 2)  to meet, meet up

title: alcontrar


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 受 read as じゅ


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 伸 read as のぶ


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with kanji read as のぶ


text:
Reconstruction:Proto-Slavic/bordatъ

Etymology
..

Adjective

 * 1) bearded

Descendants

 * East Slavic:
 * South Slavic:
 * West Slavic:
 * Pomeranian:
 * Sorbian:
 * West Slavic:
 * Pomeranian:
 * Sorbian:
 * West Slavic:
 * Pomeranian:
 * Sorbian:
 * West Slavic:
 * Pomeranian:
 * Sorbian:
 * Pomeranian:
 * Sorbian:
 * Pomeranian:
 * Sorbian:
 * Pomeranian:
 * Sorbian:
 * Sorbian:
 * Sorbian:
 * Sorbian:

title: Reconstruction:Proto-Slavic/bordatъ


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 元 read as がん


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 再 read as さ


text:
arquebisbe

Etymology
From the, from.

Noun

 * 1) archbishop

title: arquebisbe


text: arquebisbes

title: arquebisbes


text:
Wiktionary talk:About Proto-Slavic

Some proposed changes

 * removing 80% of the article which deals with history - that's encyclopaedic. WT:AEN doesn't explain Great Vowel Shift. Some of it is quite disputable (e.g. proto-language being spoken, IPA values for reconstructed segments, where exactly was Proto-Slavic spoken)
 * document existing templates used for headword line and inflection
 * references on which entries should be created (i.e. no OR)
 * templates (textual, not MW) for the list of descendants, new entries (noun, adjectives, verbs).
 * notation for accents - I prefer the classical one, the one by Derksen based on Serbo-Croatian gives me headaches --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 04:50, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Stuff to do

 * Create an appendix on Common Slavic accent paradigms
 * Add an optional parameter to {sla-PoS} to indicate accent paradigm and link to the appendix. Should accept two values (in case of uncertainties).
 * Rewrite inflection templates in Lua so that their number, as well as the number of parameters they require, is reduced - i.e. detection of the type of stem, and whether the consonant should undergo palatalization before the desinence. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 07:39, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Early Proto-Slavic
Recently mostly Early Proto-Slavic (i.e. the "real" Proto-Slavic, as opposed to Common-Slavic which we term Proto-Slavic) forms is dealt with in the literature, i.e. forms with distinctive lengths, diphthongs, closed syllables etc. We could provide both proto-forms, together with inflections (which differ from sources to source, because the development of word-final clusters is disputed, so there would be multiple inflections per specified sources), and a description of changes (sounds, accents) that occurred in the Common Slavic period. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 06:36, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

*kt, *gt -> *ť?
Whence is this rule? What for? Especially when only page titles follow it. E. g. there is page Reconstruction:Proto-Slavic/moťi but all derivatives linking to it list PS form *mogti. So what’s the purpose of this change in PS lexicon? Same with *noktь/*noťь – Silmethule (talk) 12:40, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
 * That change was Common Slavic. Strictly speaking, both *noktь and *noťь are true, it's just that the former is an earlier form of the latter. (note that before velar consonants, kt and xt change to t instead) *noktь is the traditional form used in the dictionaries. Personally I'm agnostic on the issue.
 * The reason why etymologies link to *mogti is because the Proto-Slavic page was originally created as *mogti, and the person who moved it hasn't followed the standard procedure of updating the references to the old page as well. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 12:50, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The difference between -gt-/-kt- and -tj- is not reconstructable via the comparative method. They all share the same outcome in the Slavic languages which means that they merged in Proto-Slavic at some point. Only by internal reconstruction, or by referring to earlier forms (Balto-Slavic, PIE) can we know which of the two was the original form. We could decide to write it as tj instead, but ť seems more suitable as an abstract symbol as the exact pronunciation of this sound is rather uncertain. Proto-Slavic and History of the Slavic languages give more information. 13:15, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
 * There is lots of evidence in onomastics (toponyms, personal names) written in other languages, as well as borrowings from Latin and Greek to Slavic. We can even date these changes very precisely. Georg Holzer in Historische Grammatik des Kroatischen shows that kt, xt > k'ť, x'ť, and only much later do these change to ť. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 13:59, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Also, looking at other present forms of descendants we can reconstruct some of the original kt', gt' groups, like *mogti basing on eg. modern Polish mogę, możesz (however it only works, when first element is part of stem and the second – of ending).
 * And, regarding to writing ť instead of tj – it makes no sense, when nj, rj and lj are preferred – one consistent way of iotation would look better. // Silmeth @talk 17:29, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Every other book seems to have its own way of marking palatalized/palatal consonants. However, I agree that it's inconsistent to have digraphs in case of */lj/ or */nj/, while simultaneously having */ť/ and */ď/. There is also the problem of not having the distinction of iotated/palatalized consonants and normal sequences such as *lj and *nj* in internal history of Proto-Slavic in extended etymologies (see ; and also *t' and d* that originated from the third and second palatalizations which occurred before iotation, and which later became */c/, */dz/). Apostrophe <'> or <’> seems to be the most widespread one, perhaps we should settle on it? --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 08:42, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Now that I think about it, we should definitely provide all alternative forms for reconstructions, as they appear in the literature. I was thinking of using some box to list these instead of cluttering the headword line, which would then contain only the "Wiktionary standard form". The box would have two columns, one for reconstructions and another for the list of works that use them. Works would be listed by shortcuts which would on click link to an appendix page that lists their full name, author, etc.. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 23:23, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Some proposals

 * For nouns, adjectives and verbs an optional parameter  is added which could take values a, b, c and d (the d paradigm is reconstructed by Russians), including their combinations when there could be multiple reconstructed (e.g. a-b, similar like we have for genders). These parameters would also categorize.
 * For adjectives we make principal parts feminine and neuter, in addition to the masculine. These would be optional, i.e. generated from the masculine. This would be particularly useful in cases when accents are different in different genders. For example, the headword line for could be: bě̃lъ  (feminine *běla̍, neuter *bělo̍), which more easily explains e.g. Serbo-Croatian b(ij)ȇl, b(ij)éla, b(ij)élo. If not provided via parameters, these feminine and neuter forms could easily be generated in Lua.
 * For the verb we make principal part, beside the infinitive, the first-person singular present. For example, the headword line for would be: bě̋gati (first-person present tense bě̋gajǫ). In other words, we have both present stem and the infinitive stem listed. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 01:13, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Soft sign
If ь = ĭ then actually soft sign doesn't exists in proto-slavic? If exists then which letter will be '(apostrophe) in phonetic transliteration? I mean for exmaple russian голубь = gólubʹ, where ь = '. Useigor (talk) 04:18, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 * ь/ĭ was a vowel in Proto-Slavic, and so was ъ/ŭ. ь was pronounced like i, ъ like y or u, but less clear and shorter. Eventually, these two vowels often disappeared in the later Slavic languages, but sometimes ь/ĭ left softening as a "residue" after it disappeared. Russian writers then started to use ь (which was not a vowel with its own sound anymore) to show softening of the preceding consonant, and started to write it in places where the vowel ь had not originally been. In older Russian spelling the ъ was still written in some places too, but it was not pronounced as anything and it was dropped in 1917. 04:26, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

I mean i want to know which letter makes soft consonant. I don't understand why some stems called "soft". Useigor (talk) 22:55, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Some letters are soft and others are hard. Soft are č, š, ž, c, ś, j, ť, ď (and also nj, lj, rj). A stem that ends with one of those sounds is a soft stem. 23:39, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Please note that consonants š, ž, c (ш, ж, ц) are almost always hard in Russian (but šč - щ is soft), (adding ь doesn't make them soft), can be both ways in Ukrainian, c can be both ways in Belarusian but š and ž are always hard. There are more soft (palatalised) consonants. --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 23:58, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
 * But what about dz? Is it soft like c(ts)? Useigor (talk) 05:53, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Church Slavonic
keeps removing it from the descendants list for unknown reason. Church Slavonic recensions are generally treated as separate languages, with their own literatures, spelling rules, dictionaries and grammars. They have attestations for many words not found in the limited corpus of OCS canon. Etymological dictionaries always mark words found in them as such (CS, not OCS). They should thus be marked as a separate language in the descendants list as well. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 13:57, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I didn't "keep removing" it; I removed it once. Anyway, I'm not so much against having it, but against its location. It's not its own subfamily of Slavic, but still a part of South Slavic and should probably be as a sub-element of OCS. --WikiTiki89 14:06, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Russian Church Slavonic is South Slavic? --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 15:58, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Well it's a direct continuation of OCS in written-only form, isn't it? Use of Medieval Latin in England doesn't make it not an Italic language. --WikiTiki89 16:18, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
 * It's spoken not written-only. OCS is merely a carefully selected oldest layer of what was already at the time separate literary languages. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 14:27, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
 * It's not "spoken", just read aloud. --WikiTiki89 19:37, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
 * In other words, it was spoken. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 20:10, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
 * This is just a matter of semantics and has nothing to do with whether it is a South Slavic language. --WikiTiki89 14:43, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Church Slavonic recensions were adaptations according to the local vernacular. Yes the basis was "South Slavic" (I'm putting question marks because at that time of OCS MSS there was no geographical separation of the Slavic speech yet, and such notion is anachronic) and these adaptations far outnumber the few isoglosses (phonological, grammatical, lexical) that characterize OCS as South Slavic from the modern perspective. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 15:19, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
 * So then it might make sense to place it in a different place depending on where the particular word is found. As the default location, it makes sense to place it as a sub-element of OCS. --WikiTiki89 16:08, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Why you're using nj, rj, lj and dz?
In my opinion ń, ŕ, ĺ are better, they save space and make text more readable. Look at the list: ť *ď, *č, *ž, *š, *c, *lj *nj *rj, *j — 3 last are like black sheeps. Also in fact first two are using caron (just does not fit with lowercase d,t), so the list in capital would look so: Ť, Ď, Č, Ž, Š, C, Ĺ, Ń, Ŕ (Ś, Ź). As you can see caron is for palatalized hushing consonants (at least not just -j) and acute for soft consonants (-j).

I absolutely don't get why we're using dz while only polish it does. Don't you think that common slavic change is g > dz (or dź) > z (or ź) otherwise we must not write epenthetic l since it's barely appear in west slavic. We can't randomly choose when to listen to west slavs when don't.

Useigor (talk) 08:39, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
 * kъnjiga / kъńiga
 * prijateljь / prijateĺь (never have seen proto-slavic words/roots with not iotated vowel after i)
 * brjuxo / bŕuxo
 * cěsarjь / cěsaŕь
 * morje / moŕe

 * I agree, digraphs should be eliminated. I don't understand your second paragraph? --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 14:30, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I agree too that we should use single characters for these. But it makes more sense to me if we use hačeks for all of them, so ň, ř, ľ. And I don't understand your point in the second paragraph either. The phoneme *dz is reconstructed for Proto-Slavic based on the comparative method. Not just Polish has this sound, but also Macedonian and some forms of Old Church Slavonic. The fact that the *dz ~ *z distinction reflects an older distinction inherited from Proto-Balto-Slavic shows that it is not an innovation within each of these languages. And, being inherited, this implies that it must be reconstructed for Proto-Slavic proper. —CodeCat 14:39, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I can compare too. In third palatalization g > dz/dź in all Slavic languages, but later it was shortened to z/ź in all Slavic languages except Polish, Polabian and Old Church Slavonic. Therefore g > dz > z - is common slavic by clear majority. But you still use dz for some reason. Also i see that pj and similar changed to plj only in South and East Slavic. In West Slavic languages letter l almost doesn't appear (polish czapla looks suspicious). In this case South and East Slavs are in majority and that's right that we write epenthetic l. My conclusion is that there can be 2 variants: dź & pj or ź & pĺ.

 * About carons, if we're gonna use soft ź and ś and with acuts therefore soft ń, ŕ, ĺ must use acuts as well to be same with ź and ś, since ž and š are in use already and they represent another palatalized sounds. I mean that acute for soft consonants (e.g. lj / ĺ), caron for palato-alveolar (they are in most descendants).Useigor (talk) 20:33, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I think you misunderstand what Proto-Slavic is. It's the common ancestor of all Slavic languages, not just of some of them. If we say that Polish dz descends from *z, that would not make sense. We have to use the form that is ancestral to every Slavic language. Majority has nothing at all to do with it. Compare for example what we do with Proto-Germanic *z. Almost all Germanic languages reflect this phoneme as r, the only ones that don't are Gothic and Proto-Norse, both very old languages. So if we went by a majority here, we'd have to use *r for Proto-Germanic, but that would not make sense because *z is the older, ancestral form of the sound. Likewise, Proto-Germanic *ē is reflected as ē in Gothic but as ā in all other Germanic languages, but we reconstruct *ē because that is the original form of the sound. —CodeCat 20:39, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
 * That said, recent examination of the Old Novgorod dialect suggests that we should reconstruct neither *dz nor *z, but actually *g (or *ǵ?). The Old Novgorod letters were actually written in an obscure form of Slavic that did not take place in the second or third palatalisations, which affected every other Slavic language we know of. The fact that it did not take part in the change in the same way shows that the palatalisation actually took place after Proto-Slavic had split into dialects to some degree. —CodeCat 23:55, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Seems your position is clear for me. Also i like ǵ, kъnęǵь with it looks good, and i think you know that in Russian feminine of this word is княгиня (kńagińa). But i still don't understand epenthetic l (i mentioned in my both messages) - it's not common for Western Slavs therefore we must write zemja (zem-ja), stьbjь (stьb-jь), čapja (čap-ja) and etc. — Useigor (talk) 22:57, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I like the idea of using *ǵ and *ḱ and was actually going to suggest it myself. If we do this, I would also move and  to  and . This is inconsistent, though, with the use of *ś for palatalized *x, but *x́ would look pretty weird. --WikiTiki89 23:45, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
 * There is one point we need to examine first though. In Common Slavic, vowel fronting after palatal consonants followed the application of the progressive palatalisation. This is why we have *kъnęgъ > (progressive palatalisation) *kъnęǵъ > (fronting) *kъnęǵь > (assibilation in non-Novgorod Slavic) *kъnędzь. The progressive palatalisation (one of the two which did not fully affect Old Novgorod) would have first palatalised the final consonant, and following that its declension would have switched over from "hard" to "soft" due to vowel fronting. This means, then, that we must look for signs of soft declensions in Old Novgorod nouns that underwent the progressive palatalisation in other Slavic dialects. If there is evidence of this, then we can conclude that *kъnęǵь is the latest form common to all Slavic languages, and it would also mean that the progressive palatalisation did apply to ON, but did not progress as far. If there is no soft declension for such nouns in ON, then we must necessarily reconstruct *kъnęgъ for all of Slavic. —CodeCat 00:35, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Based on Древненовгородский диалект, some of the attested ON reflexes of the forms of are, , , , , , , , . It also contradictorily states that all the forms have the stem , but I don't think that makes that big of a difference. It is pretty clear that it uses the hard declension. --WikiTiki89 01:19, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

 * The jury is still out on how to explain aberrant features of North Russian speeches. According to some they are not exemption from e.g. second palatalization, but rather later innovations or special developments such as a postponed monophothongization. The are alternative reconstructions of Proto-Slavic (e.g. by Georg Holzer) that go chronologically earlier to account for such anomalies, and for other reasons. According to Holzer's chronology the "middle steps" from k, g > c, dz (> z) are not ḱ, ǵ but rather t ' , d ' . There is also the issue of the little fact that 2nd palatalization is a very old isogloss and has been completed before some other Common Slavic changes took place (such as iotation, the rise of jers and nasal vowels..) so mixing such chronologically different stages is a big no-no. Those alternative reconstructions are slowly being accepted so we might add them in 5-10 years when theories get sufficiently fleshed out.
 * Regarding dz - it is attested in Glagolitic (the older part of the corpus) OCS where it is overwhelmingly marked with a special letter: ⰷ (dz), and occasionally with z (this at a point when the change dz > z was completed, the letter ⰷ lost its original function and was used strictly as a numeral). Glagolitic script is generally assumed to be purely phonemic, reflecting Constantine-Cyrillus' vernacular, and that dz is given a special symbol points to its authenticity as a "separate sound". Furthermore, the Cyrillic (younger) part of the OCS corpus regularly writes z, which indicates that dz is indeed a genuine output of the 2nd palatalization, and z a later change.
 * Regarding the divergent developments of l-epenthesis there are two explanations in the literature: 1) Some Slavic areas didn't exhibit the epenthesis on morpheme boundaries 2) the change was regular everywhere both within a morpheme and at morpheme boundaries, but l was lost at morpheme boundaries in some areas. Regarding the evidence - again the older part of the OCS canon has more consistent usage of epenthesis in all positions, almost completely regular in Glagolitic corpus. E.g. in (early 11th c., Glagolitic) 342 attestations have the epenthesis while 85 lack it; in  (11th c., Cyrillic) out of 205 attestations 90 are without epenthetic l, while in  (also 11th c., Cyrillic) 695 out of 791 forms lack the epenthesis. West Slavic evidence is a bit less clear since some early 10th century attestations lack the epenthesis, but seconary evidence (toponyms such as Czech Vidovle and Davle, 14th-century Hungarian attestation of Slovak Ribelyn vs. today's Rybany or a 1276 attestation of Hleulan vs. today's Chlievany, isolated words such as Polish kropla, grobla : Kashubian kropla, grable, konople : Lower Sorbian grobla : Slovak hrobľa, hrobeľ) indicates that it was originally a Common Slavic change and developments in Bulgarian-Macedonian and West Slavic developments are secondary. That's what most scholars agree with, though few hold that the few exceptions in West Slavic are not archaisms but secondary developments as well (e.g. change of syllable boundary: grob|ja > gro|bja where the epenethesis was regular within a morpheme). At best the evidence is inconclusive and is another argument in favor of pushing the reconstruction o "true" Proto-Slavic to an earlier stage.

There is also the possibility to use superscript ʲ everywhere which looks much nicer IMHO. ť and ď look like ejectives. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 00:12, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

*bata, *baťa, *batja (ЭССЯ-1-163)
What's the difference between *baťa & *batja and how to type second word if we change third to baťa? — Игорь Телкачь 17:23, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
 * ť is the notation we use for the iotated t, which originated from a former -tj- sequence. So ť and tj are the same thing. —CodeCat 19:22, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Wordless descendants
For me most problematic part in creating pages are descendants since they're using different scripts, special chars, diacritics. So no problem if i'll be creating pages where descendants have no words, except the one that will have word? — Игорь Телкачь 01:03, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't agree with leaving out the descendants. They're crucial for any reconstructed term. —CodeCat 01:05, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Is it forbidden to create pages with one descendant? People who're familiar with language may type words. — Игорь Телкачь 01:21, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

 * It's OK to create appendices with a single reflex (e.g. Russian). You can also type reflexes without checking their spelling, placing an accent, or only transliterations, so someone else can check them later. We have folks like Anatoli that do just that (it gives them great pleasure :) --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 01:25, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Descendants with mid3
What do you think about dividing 3 Slavic groups into 3 blocks? Church Slavonic can be written above them.

East Slavic

South Slavic

West Slavic

— Игорь Тълкачь 18:09, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Excellent idea Boris. Other than cell phones and similar technologically primitive replacements for a real computer, modern computer screens have a large width-to-height ratio and horizontal placement of lists results in a more compact entry, that can be read and skimmed more easily, reducing unnecessary scrolling. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 13:49, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Vowel shift
Would it be valuable to give forms with their early Proto-Slavic vocalism (i.e. *ä *a and *ī *ē *ǟ *ā *ō *ū in place of *e *o, and *i *ě *a *u *y) beside the common Slavic (post-PSl) values currently used? I imagine there will be pushback about doing away with the current notation entirely, but this would help quite a bit for putting PSl in its Balto-Slavic context and for clarifying old loanwords into adjacent languages. --Tropylium (talk) 17:02, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
 * We can include them in the etymology section (like "from earlier *xyz"). I don't think they should be headwords though. --WikiTiki89 17:04, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

*noktь vs. *noťь
None of Derksen, ESSJa and Vasmer use the assimilated form *noťь. Derksen and Vasmer use unassimilated *noktь and ESSJa uses partly assimilated *nokťь. Similarly for *mogti/*mogťi vs. moťi, etc. I wonder if we shouldn't put the headwords under the unassimilated or partly assimilated form instead of the assimilated form. I'm generally a believer in following prevailing sources unless there's a good reason not to. Note that forms like Ukrainian and Belarusian  (vs. Russian ) suggest that the unassimilated form *bergti and partly assimilated form *bergťi might have coexisted in Common Slavic with the assimilated form *berťi (unless the Ukrainian and Belarusian forms are secondary). Benwing2 (talk) 21:05, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I prefer showing the form that is actually reconstructable. —CodeCat 21:12, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
 * What about Belarusian волокцы, Slovak vliecť < *velkti? Benwing2 (talk) 21:49, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
 * They could easily be analogical. —CodeCat 21:51, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
 * is attestable as a Russian word (I think it's dialectal) in . --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 22:27, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
 * As far as i know such Ukrainian verbs are secondary, also i can't recall similar forms in Old East Slavic. Compare, , . In Historical-Etymological Dictionary of the Russian Language (Černyx, volume 1, page 579) written > . —Игорь Тълкачь (talk) 23:29, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Do you know an online source for Chernykh (or somewhere to get the PDF's)? The only one I found requires a Windows-only DJVU plugin and I have a Mac. Benwing2 (talk) 00:00, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
 * http://imwerden.de/publ-1712.html http://imwerden.de/publ-1713.html —Игорь Тълкачь (talk) 15:18, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Benwing2 (talk) 15:23, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

 * I have a hunch that and  and other such forms are more likely to be due to leveling, but it would be good to find some scholarly opinions on this subject. --WikiTiki89 15:33, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Accent pattern references for verbs and adjectives
(moved from User talk:Useigor)

Wondering if anyone knows a good reference for the accentual patterns of Proto-Slavic verbs and adjectives (and any references for the accentual patterns of nouns other than Verweij 1994). Benwing2 (talk) 13:03, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Benwing2 (talk) 13:04, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't have such a reference.--Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 13:15, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't know, maybe in some Dybo's works —Игорь Тълкачь (talk) 19:55, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
 * What's a good reference for Proto-Slavic verbs? I'd like to fill in the conjugations of some of the Proto-Slavic verb entries I'm creating. CodeCat, you created most of the verb templates, where did you get the info from? Benwing2 (talk) 19:40, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't know (except Meillet "The Common Slavic" and conjugations of Slavic languages) —Игорь Тълкачь (talk) 02:30, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Proto-Slavic verb conjugation reference
It looks like you created most of the verb conjugation templates. Where did you get the info from? Is this purely reconstructing back from OCS or is there a reference I can look at? I would like to flesh out some of the remaining conjugations. Benwing2 (talk) 02:12, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
 * It's reconstructed back from OCS mostly. There are still some issues, such as the variation in 3rd singular endings, 3rd plural endings, and also the 1st plural and 2nd singular. —CodeCat 13:41, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

RFM discussion: September 2013–May 2017
I am proposing that entries such as *reťi (and *moťь, *noťь, *dъťi and others) and *meďa (and *svěťa, etc.) be renamed to *rekti (*moktь, *noktь, *dъkti) and *medja (*světja), respectively; i.e. as they usually spelled in academic works. Another inconsistency is that some entries have the intrusive *l, while others do not (compare *čaplja : *zemja). --220.253.179.121 10:45, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I support using -kt-/-tj-/-dj- in these cases. WT:ASLA already specifies that epenthetic l's should be included, so Reconstruction:Proto-Slavic/zemja needs to be moved to Reconstruction:Proto-Slavic/zemlja. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 10:50, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
 * There is no difference between -kt- and -tj-, the distinction is purely etymological. So I don't support making it. And WT:ASLA did not originally specify that the l should be included, Ivan unilaterally rewrote most of that page and it does not represent consensus. 11:21, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
 * If the difference is purely etymological, then surely the etymology section of an entry is the place to make it. I don't see any objections being raised to the inclusion of the -l-, and in consensus-building silence implies consent. Personally I'd prefer to exclude it because we should be giving the oldest reconstructable form (hence -kt-) and the -l- is "unetymological". —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 11:49, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Surely if we want the oldest reconstructable form, we should be reconstructing PIE and not Proto-Slavic? Reconstructions should concern themselves with the latest common ancestor, not the earliest. There is no descernable difference between -kt- and -tj- in Slavic, both have the exact same outcome in all languages. So the comparative method that linguists use to make reconstructions will give one phoneme, which has been labelled as *ť on Wiktionary and Wikipedia. To reconstruct the difference between -kt- and -tj- requires "outside information", which is not always available. It would be a bit like reconstructing the distinction between short a and o for Proto-Germanic depending on their origin, even though these clearly merged. 11:55, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
 * And concerning -j- or -lj-, there is no clear linguistic consensus on whether -lj- is original or -j-, so we just picked one to standardise on. 11:57, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Internal reconstruction within the protolanguage and comparison with sister languages and protolanguages is also part of historical linguistics, and distinguishing tj < *kt from tj < *tj provides useful information. We don't have to put blinders on and look only at what's reconstructable from the daughter languages, especially since the majority of published sources don't either, and do distinguish the two types of tj. If we didn't allow internal reconstruction within the proto-language, we'd never reconstruct any PIE laryngeals at all except in words directly attested in Anatolian (and even then we would never reconstruct h₁ at any rate). —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 12:11, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I think you're mistaken. While some linguists are in the habit of reconstructing laryngeals to account for any occurrence of *a or a long vowel, there are many who don't and disagree with this practice. Ringe for example explicitly argues that not all cases of *a should be reconstructed as *h₂e just for the sake of it. But there are many cases where the descendants rule out *a and require *h₂e, so then it can be reconstructed. This doesn't apply to Slavic *ť though. There are no examples of any discernable difference between *kt and *tj in any Slavic language, so trying to distinguish them is always going to be an irregular and incomplete process. And there's also a more esthetic argument: Proto-Slavic didn't allow syllables to end in an obstruent, and we don't have reconstructions with obstruent-final syllables anywhere. Yet *noktь has such a syllable, so it would be internally inconsistent if we used this representation, unless we somehow "decide" that *kt is actually a single phoneme. And if you get to that point then you might as well just respell that phoneme as *ť... 12:53, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
 * What cases are there where non-Anatolian descendants "rule out *a and require *h₂e"? Reconstructing kt in Proto-Slavic is no different than reconstructing ɸ in Proto-Celtic (or, as I said, h₁ in PIE—or for that matter e-vocalism next to h₂ and h₃); if we know from other evidence that it was there, there's no reason to exclude it, and certainly no reason for reconstructions to "concern themselves with the latest common ancestor, not the earliest". —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 14:15, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Well actually, the Proto-Slavic we reconstruct here is not actually the latest common ancestor, it's later. As far as I can tell, we have certain sound changes applied to our reconstructions, even though they can be demonstrated to have occurred after certain other changes that we don't apply. For example, the liquid diphthongs were changed in a dialect-specific way before the vowels *o and *a differed in quality (because *or is lengthened to *ra in South Slavic). But the quality distinctions must have arisen before a whole lot of accent changes that happened in late Common Slavic, such as the creation of accent class B (which we reconstruct). But in all of these cases we represent "archiphonemes" that can be reconstructed for all Slavic languages based on comparative evidence. *or is an archiphoneme that should be understood as meaning different things in different Slavic dialects. The same should be done for *ť, for which comparative evidence gives only a single phoneme rather than two, so there is nothing beyond that to reconstruct. 14:39, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

 * Archived as stale. - -sche (discuss) 19:33, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Rename conjugation category names
Current names are based on present stem, it makes more difficult to find needing category, because present is not used in article names and usually suffixed words are derived from infinitive. So i think there is need to change order in conjugation names: from pres/[inf] to inf/[pres]. Is there any objections or alternative propositions?—Игорь Тълкачь (talk) 17:10, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Renamed.—Игорь Тълкачь (talk) 19:55, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Use the traditional accent symbols
I don't think we should be following the Leiden school (e.g. Derksen) on this. They are known to be radical and their reconstructions aren't the consensus among linguists generally. Some of their accentual reconstructions are demonstrably false on some points.

Loss of yer causes lengthening in monosyllables only after Proto-Slavic. This happens after the shortening of the circumflex in some Slavic dialects, where the compensatory lengthening from the loss re-lengthens the syllable again. The Leiden school posits, with a circumflex lengthened from an older short vowel, but this cannot be the case because there is a long vowel even West Slavic, where the circumflex regularly shortens. The circumflex posited by the Leiden school thus requires positing lengthening from a lost yer twice in order to explain the attested forms, once in order to form the circumflex, then again to re-lengthen it in dialects that shorten the circumflex. Such forms are better reconstructed with a short vowel for Proto-Slavic.

The Leiden school also posits shortening of all acuted syllables pre-Dybo's law. But this is again untenable, for two reasons. Firstly, as Kapović notes in The Development of Proto-Slavic Quantity, loanwords from 9th-10th Slavic into Hungarian preserve length on acuted syllables, as do some loans into other languages such as Lithuanian. A second reason for questioning the shortening of all acuted syllables is that they aren't actually always short in some Slavic dialects. Czech regularly reflects the old acute as a long vowel in the first syllable. If the acute was shortened at some point, they'd have to be lengthened again in the history of Czech to produce the attested forms. —Rua (mew) 22:17, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

Another point to note regarding shortened acute: Derksen's dictionary denotes (shortened) acute with the same symbol as short neoacute, `. If this is valid, we'd expect both of them to be reflected with the same length and accentuation in all dialects: either both short or both long with all else being equal. If there is a discrepancy, they can't have been the same in Proto-Slavic. This is something that probably needs investigating. —Rua (mew) 23:04, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
 * It's been a long time since I've worked in this area and it's very hard to keep all the details straight, but I think the system I used was a compromise between the traditional symbols and Derksen's symbols, in particular using Derksen's symbols but substituting the neoacute symbol ~ whenever there was a neoacute. Benwing2 (talk) 23:32, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Also, a sound change like long -> short -> long is far from unusual; I wouldn't say this makes their interpretations untenable. The advantage of using some variant of Derksen's scheme is that his is by far the most well documented and requires the least original research on our part. Benwing2 (talk) 23:58, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Then I propose we standardise on at least two differences from Derksen.
 * The first you already mentioned, showing the long neoacute with a tilde. Technically, Derksen's scheme doesn't even need the tilde, because all occurrences of ´ in his dictionary appear to be unambiguously neoacutes. However, the use of the tilde is much more common, and can't be confused with an old acute, so that's a good thing to use.
 * No circumflexes on historical short vowels. Thus, we write . This is the more traditional transcription, used by e.g. Jasanoff. It makes no assumptions about compensatory lengthening due to the lost yer.
 * There is still one big difference between the scheme and what Jasanoff uses: old acute, short neoacute, and non-initial short are all written with `, thus treating them all as identical short rising accents, while Jasanoff distinguishes the old acute with ˝ for long rising. A crucial point, which I mentioned already, is that identical accents should give identical outcomes in identical environments, so if all three of Derksen's short rising accents give the same outcomes everywhere, then he's right in not distinguishing them. We should probably look into the reflexes of these three case more and share our findings. But I think the two points I mentioned can be implemented without much controversy in the meantime. —Rua (mew) 00:14, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
 * I am fine with this. Benwing2 (talk) 00:43, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note also, when I used the ~ for neoacute I used it for both short and long neoacutes. I think it's more unambiguous this way; but if you'd rather use it only for long neoacutes, that's fine. Benwing2 (talk) 00:45, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Accent symbols imply length in Slavic, so a different symbol is needed if they are of different length. Derksen and Jasanof both use different symbols for short and long neoacute, so we can probably infer that it's generally agreed they're not the same. Tijmen Pronk's paper Early Slavic short and long o and e gives an overview of the reflexes of short neoacutes. —Rua (mew) 09:50, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
 * You may also be interested in w:Talk:Proto-Slavic btw, which is more or less the same discussion but on Wikipedia. —Rua (mew) 10:50, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
 * I've now created Module:sla-headword and made it check the accents on every headword. Those that don't conform to the proposed rules are placed in Category:Proto-Slavic entries with invalid diacritics. —Rua (mew) 10:53, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Sounds good. Benwing2 (talk) 16:01, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
 * It is necessary to distinguish the short stress and the old acute to explain the difference between e. g. *òrbъ > Cz. rob and *őrmę > Cz. rámě. Guldrelokk (talk) 22:12, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
 * *òrbъ has a long syllable, so it cannot have had short stress. —Rua (mew) 09:24, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
 * OK, true. Guldrelokk (talk) 18:16, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

Also, the last row in the table (‘Long unaccented’) is wrong. Jasanoff, Olander and Kapović simply do not recognize that a new length distinction arose already in Proto-Slavic. Neither does the MAS, nor did Stang etc: they all follow the traditional view that most lengthenings and shortenings took place in later dialects and that there was no contrast like *a (≠ *o) ~ *ā in PS. Guldrelokk (talk) 22:33, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
 * That's not true. Jasanoff does not reconstruct long vowels in final syllables, giving them all the same accent mark a̍. And how is the pretonic length resulting from Dybo's law explained? There is no pretonic length when Dybo's law didn't apply, is there? —Rua (mew) 09:29, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
 * That final long vowels are usually assumed to have shortened does not mean there was a phonological contrast between *a and *ā. It is normally assumed that pretonic length was preserved in mobile paradigms also. The difference between e. g. *trǫbà > Cz. trouba and *rǫkà > Cz. ruka is explained as levelling in the second case (from ruku etc.). That there was a difference in Proto-Slavic is a Leiden position, see e. g. Kapović’s Slavic length again ‘Pretonic and posttonic length’ for arguments against it. Guldrelokk (talk) 18:16, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Hmm, are there any cases of pretonic length in multisyllabic nouns of accent paradigm a, like ? Neither Dybo's nor Ivšić's laws applied here, so the Slavic accent directly reflects the original Balto-Slavic one with no complications. —Rua (mew) 18:29, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
 * No. Long vowels shorten before a medial acute, including one that arose by Dybo’s law: for example, *travi̋na (*travà a. p. b) > Cz., Sk. travina, Cr. tràvina. Guldrelokk (talk) 18:42, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Looking at Proto-Slavic accent, the number of following syllables seem to make the difference, with trisyllables never having pretonic length at all. But yer-final words are treated as having one less syllable, so something like could in theory fit the pattern. There would have been an alternation in the first syllable between long and short based on the ending, which was probably eliminated, but who knows what relics of it remain. I wonder if there are any words like that but with short accent instead of acute on the second syllable. Those would be affected by Dybo's law, but not Ivšić, thus reflecting an original non-acute accent on the first syllable. —Rua (mew) 18:59, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
 * I found one: . —Rua (mew) 19:09, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Final yers do generally count. In words with medial short stress, the length is preserved: e. g. *ǫtròba > Cz., Sk. útroba, Po. wątroba, *kǫkòľь > Cr. kúkolj, Cz. koukol, Sk. kúkoľ, Po. kąkol, but there is no way to show it has something to do with Dybo’s law, since words with original short medial stress acquired desinential accent and do not have pretonic long vowels. The debate on pretonic length in a. p. c is centred around different data. Mate Kapović recently wrote another paper on this subject, On shortening, lengthening, and accent shifts in Slavic; there is also a reply by Kortlandt. Guldrelokk (talk) 19:27, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your replies, it is useful information. What do you think, should we ditch the macron too? —Rua (mew) 19:36, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
 * My preference is to keep the macron for now to avoid making too many changes at once (following the software engineering principle of incremental change), but revisit it later once we've converted all existing Proto-Slavic lemmas and references to them to your new accent scheme. Benwing2 (talk) 19:47, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

Obscure endings
Hey, why do soft a-stem nouns link their nom./acc. pl. ? I neither know what it means nor appears it likely that that dot, unmentioned by WT:ASLA, should be it linked if it means something.

Another question I have not come to ask anywhere yet is why the 3rd persons singular and plural of the present conjugations in the verb tables end in  instead of   though Old Church Slavonic and Old East Slavic and all later I can think off reflect. of course matches the Proto-Germanic and Proto-Indo European i but how does one else suppose it was  at the time we reconstruct? Fay Freak (talk) 08:14, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
 * *ę̇ is a result of the comparative method: in some languages it becomes *ę, in others it becomes *ě. See History of Proto-Slavic. —Rua (mew) 13:50, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Coincidentally I have now found that Wikipedia section, imagining Proto-Slavic and North Slavic ending etymologies differently before. So plural-only soft a-stems should be lemmatized at ę̇? But then we have to mention it at WT:ASLA? Because it does not just mean “ambiguous vowel” but an actually assumed one. I thought though our reconstructions are not that deep: otherwise one could change the tables to show both endings, as a later stage where South and North Slavic varied, like one does with those locative plurals, is that better? This would mean though plural-only soft a-stems would always have alternative form redirects (though they are rare). Fay Freak (talk) 14:12, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Oh, and that article: Isn’t it unfortunate how it starts with the notation ę̄ and then proceeds with ę̇ (although I realize it means that at some point it counts as long and then it is not long). In the table *ę̄ ends up *ę although what you are saying in the text is that it is *ę and *ě from  *ę̇ in between (then of course the question is what the column titles would be, what Proto-Slavic and what Common Slavic). (Another question is whether man understands it without seeing both an Old Church Slavonic and e.g. an Old East Slavic declension table in mind or at hand; only when I compared them I realized that —which I did not see in the ę̇ given in our tables or perhaps paradigms elsewhere only giving South Slavic ę—is actually not a separate reconstruction from and came upon that article to finally dissolve the confusion and posit it is a simultaneously valid form, surely not as conscious about the variation as someone with Indo-Europeanist background is used to be). Fay Freak (talk) 14:33, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Nasalization section of the article mentions 2 sources (Derksen 2008, Kortlandt 1994) but it doesn't specify pages.
 * 1) It presents ę̇ character but i fail to find "ę̇" in the sources (e.g. Derksen §2.2.3.1, §3.1, Kortlandt §5.9, §7.8, §7.9, §12.2).
 * 2) It states:
 * a) *į̄ > *ę̇
 * b) *ę̇ (high-mid nasal vowel) is unlike to *ę (low-mid [nasal] vowel)
 * c) *ę̇/*ę > *ę/*ę (South Slavic), *ě/*æ̨~ja (elsewhere)
 * I'm not interested in this topic but i will mention i did not find "ę̇" in Meillet, Le Slave Commun (§72, §127, §166, §464, §465) or Ronald I Kim (*ě₃, ě tertium). —Игорь Тълкачь (talk) 17:50, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Present 3rd-person singuglar/pluar -ь is supported by East Slavic languages and Old Polish:, , Ukrainian -(ть), -ть, Old Novgorodian есть, соуть, Old East Slavic хочеть, хотѧть, Russian Church Slavonic -ть, -ть  , Old Polish jeść (jesc/yescz/ieſch). —Игорь Тълкачь (talk) 15:12, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Well, one says something like that “from the irregular one reconstructs” and from the distribution of the forms one may perhaps draw a conclusion, though the irregular verb alone is not conclusive.
 * Can we find some terms were South Slavic has ę but North ě other than in feminine plurals of soft-stems so we can assess whether page-titles should have the rarely seen ę̇? Also . Fay Freak (talk) 03:27, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Not sure if it is intrinsically South Slavic, but 🇨🇬 ends in *-ę̇. There could be others, but none currently come to my mind. Безименен (talk) 09:50, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
 * It's not clear what you mean by "the irregular one".
 * 1) 3sg/3pl -ть is not irregular in East Slavic, you can check:
 * tldr: Жолобов О. Ф. Древнерусский глагол: функционирование и эволюция
 * С. И. Иорданиди. Из наблюдений над глагольными формами в Остромировом евангелии (3-е лицо единственного и множественного числа презенса)
 * 1989, Диалектологический атлас русского языка. Центр Европейской части СССР. page 96
 * 2) East Slavic 3sg/3pl -тъ is attested since 13-14th century:
 * 1960 may contain outdated information but more recent books are unavaible online:
 * 3) I should had note that bg, mk, sh, sl, cs doesn't let distinguish *-tь/*-tъ (judging by words, , ).
 * About 3sg/3pl you can read §345, §345 in Meiilet, Le Slave commun (Мейе, Общеславянский). —Игорь Тълкачь (talk) 17:43, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I had looked into paradigms of Old Church Slavonic and Old East Slavic where there was ъ. And alone was not compelling, because irregular, although there is an argument that irregularities allow for reconstruction of regular features, that is what I meant with “from the irregular one reconstructs”. The other question stands whether there are terms where South Slavic has ę but North ě – other than in feminine plurals of soft-stems – so we can assess whether page-titles should have the rarely seen character ę̇. Fay Freak (talk) 18:09, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Old East Slavic language does not exist, since this construct is destroyed by accentology and dialectology. It's strange to compare it. Gnosandes (talk) 20:28, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
 * From what i've seen, *ę̇ is only reconstucted from declension of soft m. o-stem and a-stem nouns. Besides South vs North Slavic, you can find some words with "ě/ę" in Vasmer's dictionary: /, :  /,  /  (unless borrowed from ). —Игорь Тълкачь (talk) 17:50, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
 * 3) I should had note that bg, mk, sh, sl, cs doesn't let distinguish *-tь/*-tъ (judging by words, , ).
 * About 3sg/3pl you can read §345, §345 in Meiilet, Le Slave commun (Мейе, Общеславянский). —Игорь Тълкачь (talk) 17:43, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I had looked into paradigms of Old Church Slavonic and Old East Slavic where there was ъ. And alone was not compelling, because irregular, although there is an argument that irregularities allow for reconstruction of regular features, that is what I meant with “from the irregular one reconstructs”. The other question stands whether there are terms where South Slavic has ę but North ě – other than in feminine plurals of soft-stems – so we can assess whether page-titles should have the rarely seen character ę̇. Fay Freak (talk) 18:09, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Old East Slavic language does not exist, since this construct is destroyed by accentology and dialectology. It's strange to compare it. Gnosandes (talk) 20:28, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
 * From what i've seen, *ę̇ is only reconstucted from declension of soft m. o-stem and a-stem nouns. Besides South vs North Slavic, you can find some words with "ě/ę" in Vasmer's dictionary: /, :  /,  /  (unless borrowed from ). —Игорь Тълкачь (talk) 17:50, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
 * About 3sg/3pl you can read §345, §345 in Meiilet, Le Slave commun (Мейе, Общеславянский). —Игорь Тълкачь (talk) 17:43, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I had looked into paradigms of Old Church Slavonic and Old East Slavic where there was ъ. And alone was not compelling, because irregular, although there is an argument that irregularities allow for reconstruction of regular features, that is what I meant with “from the irregular one reconstructs”. The other question stands whether there are terms where South Slavic has ę but North ě – other than in feminine plurals of soft-stems – so we can assess whether page-titles should have the rarely seen character ę̇. Fay Freak (talk) 18:09, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Old East Slavic language does not exist, since this construct is destroyed by accentology and dialectology. It's strange to compare it. Gnosandes (talk) 20:28, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
 * From what i've seen, *ę̇ is only reconstucted from declension of soft m. o-stem and a-stem nouns. Besides South vs North Slavic, you can find some words with "ě/ę" in Vasmer's dictionary: /, :  /,  /  (unless borrowed from ). —Игорь Тълкачь (talk) 17:50, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

ablaut alternations and stress in verb conjugation
I was looking at the verbs (accent paradigm c),  (accent paradigm a), and  (accent paradigm c), wondering about the origins of Russian pres. stem forms (вою, мою, as if from *vъjǫ, *mъjǫ with vocalized yer, but пью from *pьjǫ with the yer lost). Russian sometimes vocalized strong tense yers when stressed (hence the masc. nom. sg. stressed -ой vs unstressed -ый adjectival ending from *-ъjь). But then I see that the declension table for gives only *myjǫ, while there are two alternative tables for, with either *vyjǫ and vъjǫ, the table for  gives only the yer-form *pьjǫ.

The alternations of y with ъ and i with ь are the regular ablaut alternations with BSl. neo-lengthened grade (← *ū / *u; *ī / *i).

I understand the conjugation is reconstructed mostly from Old Church Slavic forms. In OCS texts *myti seems to always show the long form/tense-yer development (ie. basically always мꙑѭ), *vyti is attested in Russian(?) manuscript of Vita Constantini in ꙗко и влъческы воюще, but *piti shows both original yer and tense development (both пиєтъ and пьєтъ etc. among citations in gorazd.org dictionaries). In Olander’s accentological list all have long-grade/tense-yer: *myjǫ, *vyjǫ, *pijǫ.

I don’t know what accent patterns are reconstructed for verb conjugation, but from the Russian forms I would guess they all must have had yers in the present tense stem, and *vъjǫ, *mъjǫ were stressed on the first syllable while pьjǫ on the second (like in modern Russian, мо́ю, во́ю, пью́) – but that’s just a random guess, that could be wrong esp. since *pìti and *vỳti are assigned the same accent paradigm in Olander’s list, and *mỳti a different one (and I guess Russian could have undergone some later paradigm levelling).

So, overall, I wonder if there’s a reason to treat present stem of and  differently (the former with -y- only, the latter with either -y- or -ъ-). They’re both with *y in most languages, including OCS, but stressed /o/ in Russian. And how they differ from (only -ь- forms in the table; yer lost in Russian, OCS either lengthening tense yer, or not; other languages generally with /pi-/). // Silmeth @talk 15:46, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Conjugations are based on what you can find in sources. Problem is that sources can just omit/avoid reconstruction without explanation as if it was self-evident or difficult to reconstruct (e.g. 'воя' in Anikin, '*biti' in ESSJa , 'выть' in Vasmer ).
 * (per ESSJa, Vasmer, Chernykh)
 * Per Chernykh: Russian о́й < ы́й (like ой < ы̆й < ъй) in,.
 * (per Anikin ), (per Anikin )
 * (per Chernykh)
 * Here is list of what you can find in some dictionaries. —Игорь Тълкачь (talk) 17:23, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

RFC discussion: January 2017

 * Reconstruction:Proto-Slavic/veprь
 * Reconstruction:Proto-Slavic/pěsъkъ
 * Reconstruction:Proto-Slavic/šestъ
 * Reconstruction:Proto-Slavic/vъnukъ

Not an expert, so I can't really judge if these contributions from the same anon are unpolished gems or candidates for speedy deletion. Any takers? --Robbie SWE (talk) 18:40, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Reconstruction:Proto-Slavic/šestъ appears to be a candidate for speedy deletion, since we have Reconstruction:Proto-Slavic/šestь. The others I can't comment on with certainty. — Kleio (t · c) 18:51, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Reconstruction:Proto-Slavic/vъnukъ appears to be a gem, so it needs to be polished. Mulder1982 (talk) 16:15, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

title: Wiktionary talk:About Proto-Slavic


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 初 read as はつ


text:
arxillaüt

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) archlute

title: arxillaüt


text: arxillaüts

title: arxillaüts


text: Category:Catalan terms prefixed with arxi-


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 勝 read as かつ


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 康 read as やす


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 半 read as はん


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with kanji read as やす


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 去 read as きょ


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 定 read as てい


text:
motllura

Etymology 1
.

Noun

 * 1)  molding

title: motllura


text: motllures

title: motllures


text:
ανακαινίζω

Verb

 * 1) to renovate, refurbish
 * 2) to recondition

title: ανακαινίζω


text:
motllo

Etymology
~, from. Forms with final -o documented since the 15th century.

title: motllo


text: motllos

title: motllos


text:
eclais

Etymology
Borrowed from, from.

Noun

 * 1) The Christian Church, as an institution
 * "sga"
 * "sga"

- i n-ellug inna æcaillse

 * "sga"
 * "sga"

- rocar crist innęclais

 * 1) a local church or community of believers
 * ↄdidaccadar cach eclis glosses ostendite in facie aeclesiarum
 * 1) clergy
 * 2) a church, a building for worship
 * 1) a church, a building for worship

title: eclais


text:
ανανεώνω

Verb

 * 1) to renew, renovate
 * 2) to replenish
 * 3) to revive, refresh

title: ανανεώνω


text: motlles

title: motlles


text:
yehhuatl

Pronoun

 * 1) he, she, him, her (emphatic)

title: yehhuatl


text:
yehhuan

Pronoun

 * 1) they, them (emphatic)

Synonyms

 * yehhuāntin

title: yehhuan


text:
tehhuan

Pronoun

 * 1) we, us (emphatic)

Synonyms

 * tehhuāntin

title: tehhuan


text:
amehhuan

Pronoun

 * 1) you (plural, emphatic)

Synonyms

 * amehhuāntin

title: amehhuan


text:
ανακαλύπτω

Etymology
From. .

Verb

 * 1) to discover, uncover
 * 2) to invent, discover

title: ανακαλύπτω


text:
gaig

Etymology
. Cognate with 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) jay; Eurasian jay

title: gaig


text: gaigs

title: gaigs


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 俸 read as ほう


text: ànecs

title: ànecs


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 収 read as しゅう


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 号 read as ごう


text: leafcutter bees

title: leafcutter bees


text:
ανακαλώ

Etymology
From. .

Verb

 * 1) to revoke, rescind
 * 2) to recall

title: ανακαλώ


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 増 read as ま


text: abejas obreras

title: abejas obreras


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 安 read as やす


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 寄 read as よ


text:
αναιρώ

Etymology
From, contracted form of. Morphologically  +.

Verb

 * 1) to refute, revoke
 * 2) to sublate
 * 1) to sublate

title: αναιρώ


text: ανακαίνισα

title: ανακαίνισα


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 月 read as がつ


text: ανανέωσα

title: ανανέωσα


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with kanji read as がつ


text:
eixam

Etymology
..

Noun

 * 1) swarm (of bees)
 * 2)  crowd; cluster

title: eixam


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 男 read as お


text: eixams

title: eixams


text:
ανακάλυψα

Verb

 * Older form: ἀνεκάλυψα
 * Older form: ἀνεκάλυψα

title: ανακάλυψα


text: ανακάλεσα

title: ανακάλεσα


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 秀 read as ひで


text: αναίρεσα

title: αναίρεσα


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 賀 read as が


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 状 read as じょう


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 越 read as こ


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 輪 read as りん


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 頃 read as ころ


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 齢 read as れい


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 層 read as そう


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 幼 read as よう


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 往 read as おう


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 後 read as こう


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 捷 read as か


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 昨 read as さく


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 晩 read as ばん


text:
זכּרון

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) memory something remembered

title: זכּרון


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 没 read as ぼつ


text: Category:Russian suppletive verbs

title: Category:Russian suppletive verbs


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with kanji read as ぼつ


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 千 read as せん


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 美 read as び


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 貞 read as さだ


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with kanji read as さだ


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 豊 read as とよ


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with kanji read as とよ


text: Category:Russian irregular adjectives

title: Category:Russian irregular adjectives


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 誕 read as たん


text:
unnr

Etymology
From,. Cognate with 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬,.

Noun

 * 1)  a wave an undulation in a body of water
 * 2) * Vǫluspá, stanza 3, lines 3–4:
 * "non"

- vara sandr né sær né svalar unnir

title: unnr


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 積 read as せき


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 翌 read as よく


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with kanji read as よく


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 青 read as せい


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 耐 read as たい


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 九 read as きゅう


text:
deuteroxide

Noun

 * 1)  A hydroxide in which the normal hydrogen atom is replaced by one of deuterium.

title: deuteroxide


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 冷 read as ひ


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 剤 read as ざい


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 冷 read as つめ


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with kanji read as つめ


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 冷 read as さ


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 凍 read as とう


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 淡 read as たん


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 蔵 read as ぞう


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 遇 read as ぐう


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with kanji read as ぐう


text: బౌద్ధం

title: బౌద్ధం


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 静 read as せい


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 米 read as べい


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with kanji read as べい


text:
coltivamento

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) cultivation

title: coltivamento


text:
acoustomagnetoelectric

Adjective

 * 1)  Pertaining to or involving acoustics, magnetism, and electricity.
 * 2) * 1994 A. D. Margulis et al. The quantum acoustomagnetoelectric effect due to Rayleigh sound waves, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, Vol. 6 No. 31.

title: acoustomagnetoelectric


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 老 read as お


text: confidargli

title: confidargli


text: confidarla

title: confidarla


text: confidarle

title: confidarle


text: confidarli

title: confidarli


text: confidarlo

title: confidarlo


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 愛 read as あい


text: generalizzargli

title: generalizzargli


text: generalizzarla

title: generalizzarla


text: generalizzarle

title: generalizzarle


text: generalizzarli

title: generalizzarli


text: generalizzarlo

title: generalizzarlo


text: suddividergli

title: suddividergli


text: suddividerla

title: suddividerla


text: suddividerle

title: suddividerle


text: suddividerli

title: suddividerli


text: suddividerlo

title: suddividerlo


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 下 read as くだ


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 良 read as よ


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 迎 read as むか


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with kanji read as くだ


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with kanji read as むか


text:
cordaggio

Noun

 * 1) hemp fibre
 * 2) yarn

title: cordaggio


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 迎 read as げい


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 撃 read as う


text:
బుద్ధావతారము

Etymology
From +.

Noun

 * 1)  Name of Buddha, who has been treated in the Puranas as the ninth incarnation of Vishnu.

title: బుద్ధావతారము


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 丸 read as まる


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with kanji read as まる


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 春 read as しゅん


text:
బుద్ధ

Adjective

 * 1) known, understood.

title: బుద్ధ


text:
bicollinear

Adjective

 * 1)  aligned along the diagonals of the lattice.

Usage notes
Usually only used in the context of an antiferromagnetic order in a material; e.g. bicollinear AFM order, bicollinear phase.

title: bicollinear


text:
AFM

Translations

 * French:

 * French:

title: AFM


text:
బుద్ధగయ

Etymology
From +.

Proper noun

 * 1) Name of the famous Buddhist pilgrimage center in Gaya in the state of Bihar, India.

title: బుద్ధగయ


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 酔 read as よ


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 日 read as か


text: Wiktionary:Foreign Word of the Day/2013/August 10


text:
æva

Etymology
Clipping of, from a form related to , whence also , +. Literally 'not ever'.

Adverb

 * 1) never

title: æva


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 除 read as よ


text: F.B.O.

title: F.B.O.


text: F. B. O.

title: F. B. O.


text:
బుద్ధి

Etymology
Borrowed from, from the root verb.

Noun

 * 1) mind, thought, thinking, intellect.
 * 2) understanding, intelligence.
 * 3) judgement, sense, wisdom.

title: బుద్ధి


text: FBOs

title: FBOs


text: FBO's

title: FBO's


text: F/B/O

title: F/B/O


text:
-vinaan

Etymology
Derived from the active present participle of verbs (suffix ) in the essive case (suffix, in plural).

Usage notes

 * Some sources analyze this as a suffix in its own right, such as Iso suomen kielioppi.
 * A possessive suffix is always added.
 * For further usage examples, see e.g. entries,.

title: -vinaan


text:
Kotus

Etymology
Derived from the full Finnish name of the,.

Proper noun

 * 1) The : a governmental linguistic research institute geared toward studies, and standardization of languages used in Finland, i.e. Finnish, Swedish, the Sami languages, the Romani language, and Finnish Sign Language.

title: Kotus


text:
costituzionalizzazione

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) constitutionalization

title: costituzionalizzazione


text:
costituzionalizzare

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to constitutionalize, to incorporate (e.g. an amendment, a bill of rights) into a constitution
 * 2) to constitutionalize, to provide (a political body) with a constitution
 * 3) to constitutionalize, to make constitutional

title: costituzionalizzare


text: costituzionalizzando

title: costituzionalizzando


text: costituzionalizzante

title: costituzionalizzante


text: costituzionalizzato

title: costituzionalizzato


text: costituzionalizzati

title: costituzionalizzati


text: costituzionalizzata

title: costituzionalizzata


text: costituzionalizzo

title: costituzionalizzo


text: costituzionalizzi

title: costituzionalizzi


text: costituzionalizza

title: costituzionalizza


text: costituzionalizziamo

title: costituzionalizziamo


text: costituzionalizzate

title: costituzionalizzate


text: costituzionalizzano

title: costituzionalizzano


text: costituzionalizzavo

title: costituzionalizzavo


text: costituzionalizzavi

title: costituzionalizzavi


text: costituzionalizzava

title: costituzionalizzava


text: costituzionalizzavamo

title: costituzionalizzavamo


text: costituzionalizzavate

title: costituzionalizzavate


text: costituzionalizzavano

title: costituzionalizzavano


text: costituzionalizzai

title: costituzionalizzai


text: costituzionalizzasti

title: costituzionalizzasti


text: costituzionalizzò

title: costituzionalizzò


text: costituzionalizzammo

title: costituzionalizzammo


text: costituzionalizzaste

title: costituzionalizzaste


text: costituzionalizzarono

title: costituzionalizzarono


text: costituzionalizzerò

title: costituzionalizzerò


text: costituzionalizzerai

title: costituzionalizzerai


text: costituzionalizzerà

title: costituzionalizzerà


text: costituzionalizzeremo

title: costituzionalizzeremo


text: costituzionalizzerete

title: costituzionalizzerete


text: costituzionalizzeranno

title: costituzionalizzeranno


text: costituzionalizzerei

title: costituzionalizzerei


text: costituzionalizzeresti

title: costituzionalizzeresti


text: costituzionalizzerebbe

title: costituzionalizzerebbe


text: costituzionalizzeremmo

title: costituzionalizzeremmo


text: costituzionalizzereste

title: costituzionalizzereste


text: costituzionalizzerebbero

title: costituzionalizzerebbero


text: costituzionalizziate

title: costituzionalizziate


text: costituzionalizzino

title: costituzionalizzino


text: costituzionalizzassi

title: costituzionalizzassi


text: costituzionalizzasse

title: costituzionalizzasse


text: costituzionalizzassimo

title: costituzionalizzassimo