text: Category:la:Oaks

title: Category:la:Oaks


text: Category:es:Oaks

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Category:es:Oaks


text:
white oak

Noun

 * 1)  An oak tree with rounded leaf lobes and relatively pale wood, native to eastern North America,.
 * 2)  A similar oak tree in a subgenus,, especially section Quercus.
 * 3)  The wood of such trees.
 * 1)  The wood of such trees.

Translations

 * Abenaki: wachilmezi
 * Catawba: yap ta'ktcere
 * Central Sierra Miwok: le·ka
 * Czech:
 * French:
 * German: Weißeiche
 * Mohegan-Pequot: pakahcumus
 * Ojibwe: mitigomizh, wiishkobi-mitigomizh
 * Spanish: roble blanco
 * Unami: wipunkòkw

title: white oak


text:
Quercus alba

Hypernyms

 * - order; - family,  - subgenus;  - genus

title: Quercus alba


text:
wi'it

Noun
(plural )

 * 1) grasshopper

title: wi'it


text: wi'item

title: wi'item


text:
xwalxwal

Noun

 * 1) spider

title: xwalxwal


text:
meelowal

Noun

 * 1) disallowance, proscription
 * 1) disallowance, proscription

Adjective

 * 1) illegal

title: meelowal


text:
anleighalagh

Etymology
From +.

Adjective

 * 1) illegal

title: anleighalagh


text:
meelow

Verb

 * 1) to disallow, proscribe, prohibit

title: meelow


text:
meelowalys

Noun

 * 1) prohibition, illegality

title: meelowalys


text:
Talk:member

Member
Is penis really a synonym for member?
 * Yes. Member is a euphemism for penis, which has a great number of vulgar and euphemistic synonyms. See WS:penis. DCDuring TALK 03:48, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, "my member" meaning "my penis" is quite common in smut fanfics. --75.71.17.28 22:01, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Member
Mem·ber (plural Mem·bers) political representative: somebody elected to a legislative body such as the U.S. Congress or U.K. Parliament Microsoft® Encarta® 2009 --Backinstadiums (talk) 16:29, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

Member of Congress
somebody elected to the U.S. Congress, especially to the House of Representatives Microsoft® Encarta® 2009 --Backinstadiums (talk) 16:30, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

RFV discussion: July–August 2023
Rfv-sense: cause to remember, mention. Obsolete, but there could well be some Middle English stuff Applfsef (talk) 12:52, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

 * OED has two quotations from dated 1589; nothing later. — Sgconlaw (talk) 13:17, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

 * RFV failed Stuff I see from laptop (talk) 12:38, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:member


text:
自分自身

Pronoun

 * 1) myself, oneself

title: 自分自身


text:
Tinea

Etymology
From.

Hypernyms

 * - order, - suborder,  - infraorder,  - division

Hyponyms

 * - type species
 * For the numerous species see

Proper noun

 * 1) the river Tinée that flows in France

title: Tinea


text:
やまば

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) turning point, climax, peak

title: やまば


text:
dezlănțui

Etymology
From,.

Verb

 * 1) to unchain
 * 2)  to unleash, unbridle, release, set free
 * 3)  to burst; to rage, wreak havoc on

title: dezlănțui


text:
tavasill

Noun

 * 1) A kind of oak

title: tavasill


text:
i'musill

Noun

 * 1) interior live oak,

title: i'musill


text:
numtã

Etymology
From (probably later changed into a singular within proto-Romanian, or remade as a singular from the plural ), from, from. Compare 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) wedding

title: numtã


text: Wiktionary:Foreign Word of the Day/2012/October 25


text: Wiktionary:Foreign Word of the Day/2012/October 26


text: Wiktionary:Foreign Word of the Day/2012/October 31


text:
fiulare

Etymology
From a root, ultimately from.

Noun

 * 1)  a part of the underside of a yoke

title: fiulare


text:
yangva'

Noun
(plural )

 * 1) A kind of lizard

title: yangva'


text:
απαγόρευση κυκλοφορίας

Noun

 * 1) curfew

title: απαγόρευση κυκλοφορίας


text:
yawaywet

Noun

 * 1) canyon

title: yawaywet


text:
ya'i

Noun

 * 1) wind

title: ya'i


text: Wiktionary:Foreign Word of the Day/2012/October 27


text:
κυκλοφορία

Noun

 * 1) circulation
 * σε κυκλοφορία in circulation; on the market
 * από την κυκλοφορία out of circulation
 * 1) traffic

title: κυκλοφορία


text:
Talk:to infinite

RFV
"Alternative form of ad infinitum"

No it isn't. Not in any OneLook reference. Never heard or read it. DCDuring TALK 14:26, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

 * Maybe the creator was thinking of "to infinity"? - -sche (discuss) 19:58, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
 * "To infinity - and beyond!" - Toy Story catch phrase. Collect (talk) 20:20, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I though User:Eroica was Wonderfool actually. No evidence though. I assume this is a total error, any evidence that says it might be valid? Mglovesfun (talk) 20:28, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
 * None whatsoever that I can find. Other than cases where the "infinite" is an adjective, and the object of the preposition "to" is a noun like "lengths" or the like. Collect (talk) 21:10, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
 * @-sche: In the words of a character on Law and Order, "What am I, Kreskin?" See Kreskin.
 * To me it looked like a schoolboy calque. If someone can figure out something for this, mazel tov. DCDuring TALK 00:15, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

 * RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 09:21, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:to infinite


text:
𐤂𐤃𐤓

Etymology
Compare 🇨🇬 and 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) wall
 * 2) compound

Proper noun

 * 1) Gades, the ancient Punic settlement at Cádiz, Spain

Etymology
From.

Pronunciation
or

Noun

 * 1) wall
 * 2) compound

Proper noun

 * 1) Gades, the ancient Punic settlement at Cádiz, Spain

title: 𐤂𐤃𐤓


text: Category:Greek calques

title: Category:Greek calques


text:
spetează

Etymology
From. Compare 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) back of a chair
 * 2) elbow rest
 * 3) saw handle
 * 4) crossbeam

title: spetează


text:
târî

Etymology
, from. Compare 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1) to creep
 * 2) to lug
 * 3) to drag
 * 4) to trudge

title: târî


text: απλά εισιτήρια

title: απλά εισιτήρια


text:
Talk:stomacher

RFV
Rfv-sense: A brooch, often in three parts, worn over the stomach or chest in the seventeenth and eighteenth century. Ƿidsiþ 11:56, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

 * Added three. Any good? Equinox ◑ 13:39, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Unbelievable, figuratively speaking. The cites look good. DCDuring TALK 17:58, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Well...yes and no. The first one ("stomacher brooch") looks more like sense 2, and I wonder if the solution is really to combine the two senses and stress the often-bejewelled nature of the garment in question, since it seems to me there is not a clear dividing-line between them in the citations. I'll think about it before I close this however. Ƿidsiþ 08:44, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

 * I think Widsith's proposed merge of the senses is the best way forward, given how hard citations are to come by. - -sche (discuss) 18:42, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

 * Combined. - -sche (discuss) 01:36, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Stomacher product
Just a note: there's also a commercial device called a Seward Stomacher® used to simulate digestion processes, etc. Heard about it from a friend who works in a food-testing lab. I am not aware of any generic usage of the term. Equinox ◑ 22:17, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

title: Talk:stomacher


text:
Talk:cafe'

RFV
It has three cites, but one of them is non-durable and another one is a pseudo-mention talking about the use of cafe': in Dutch. That leaves only one 1 legitimate cite, IMO. --Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 03:23, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Just think of all the junk to which this would open the door! --Hekaheka (talk) 06:29, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

 * Google does not distinguish "cafe'" from "cafe" or "café", which makes searching very tedious. I waded through four hundred hits to find the two citations in the entry. There are, however, four million Usenet hits of those three spellings, which makes me confident this one can be cited. (Even if only one hit in four hundred is valid, there'll be ten thousand valid hits.) If anyone is going to propose it be deleted, I request that they do that first, before anyone goes to the trouble of citing it. - -sche (discuss) 08:41, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I would much rather it be cited, because IMO we only have one legitimate cite for it. Granted, I don't know how that could be achieved. --Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 00:47, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

 * Cited. Two of the citations are by Jeremy Henty (2004-05-11 and 2004-06-08) and two are by David Carrigan (2004-06-07 and 2012-05-26), so they only count as 2 total rather than 4, but then there's a citation by LeAnne (2004-08-18), which makes 3, and they span more than a year (because David Carrigan's latest one is 2012, while the rest are 2004). - -sche (discuss) 00:38, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Amazing! Thank you --Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 01:37, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

 * Why don't we have a template, or a  template?    D b f  i  r  s   08:38, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Ohmigod, what's next? Find citations for attache'? No doubt somebody has used that too, somewhere. --Hekaheka (talk) 14:50, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I tried to cite Citations:caffe' and found only one citation, so I doubt many apostrophic terms are sufficiently well attested to be included. I don't see why you fear that slippery slope, anyway. Unlike misspellings, these alternative spellings are not made by mistake but are consciously chosen (several of the citations, like Citations:caffe''s, make that clear); why should we exclude them? We include eatin' and 'alf, which also use apostrophes (in those cases, to represent omitted letters rather than accents). Anyway, that's a discussion for RFD, not RFV. - -sche (discuss) 21:10, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, I've no objection to use of the "eye-dialect" template. Perhaps we should really create a template for "silly deliberate mis-spelling of" if we are going to have lots of these.    D b f  i  r  s   09:17, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Does it make any difference that all the citations seem to be for places with Café in their name? Siuenti (talk) 16:34, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, they are all citation for Cafe' or Cafe`, and only the Dutch one (that I don't understand) is for cafe'.   D b f  i  r  s   09:26, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
 * We do not have entries for Restaurant or Café but instead handle proper names like "Podunk Greek Restaurant" in restaurant. The citations of specific capitalized Cafe's are likewise still citations of cafe'... unless you think we should create Restaurant, Café, etc. - -sche (discuss) 07:06, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Isn't this spelling just use of the word without knowledge of how to place the proper é -- like someone who writes café in a text message on a cell phone? If I am too busy typing to look up the proper letter code, I will often insert a ' after a letter or word to indicate a special case. I might or might not get back to it to correct it later. And I know I'm not the only one who does this.--Jacecar (talk) 01:01, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

 * Passed. As Equinox said about an entry or two when he was WT:RFV's principal tender: yep, I supplied the citations for this entry, but I'm also apparently the only person who tends WT:RFV. - -sche (discuss) 21:00, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

RFD discussion: June–July 2014
This seems to be a misspelling of "café". Or a typographical variant not worth keeping. Determining relative frequency seems hard, since does not really contrain the search, and finds "café", "cafe", etc. I would bet on this being a rare misspelling or form not worth keeping. --Dan Polansky (talk) 21:43, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. -Cloudcuckoolander (talk) 22:36, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

 * Occam's razor suggests it's an intentional spelling rather than a misspelling, since 'e', the apostrophe and the space bar are all so far apart it's implausible someone would strike them in the right order by accident if they only meant to strike the 'e' and space bar. Is it worth including as a spelling / typographical variant? Hmm... it seems similar to Mʳ: users of it are approximating something that they don't have quite the right tools to represent in what from a prescriptivist perspective would be the ideal way (in this case, users lack an easily-accessible 'é' key; in the case of Mʳ, users lack the ability to use HTML tags like <sup>). This is the only instance of e' being used for é I was able to find 3+ uses of, and it is a use I've seen fairly often in ASCII e-mails and the like; whether that makes it more includable (since the variation is nowhere near systematic, the way variation of 'u' and 'v' was in the past) * or less includable (since it's a one-off) is again hard to say. Weak keep. - -sche (discuss) 22:53, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
 * * Postscript: I realise we keep old u-vs-v variants, and do so in part because alternation of two characters which are now separate and used for different things is not something that can be predicted accurately by human users (especially non-native speakers) or site functions like the site search and "Did you mean ...?" function, and each form may be a word in a foreign language, which prevents the use of redirects. That applies as much to e-vs-'-vs-e'-vs-é as to u-vs-v: e' and é normally mean different things in English (contrast the cafés located on Broad Street [are expensive] with the cafe's located on Broad Street [and it opens at 10 am]), and both strings might be found in other languages (café already is attested in another language, viz. French; cafe' might be attested with some meaning in some of the many world languages that use apostrophes as letters). I'm upgrading my vote to a full keep. - -sche (discuss) 23:11, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

 * I wouldn't call it a misspelling. It is simply the use of an apostrophe in place of the accent mark, which is unavailable on most English keyboards. I've seen this done a lot in Italian, but don't see it much in English. --WikiTiki89 23:15, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

 * I have seen it and other typographic kludges (in English) with some foreign names. For example, Go"del from people who can't type Gödel and don't know about Goedel.  I've also seen G\"odel, which is just the TeX formatting code. Choor monster (talk) 12:44, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

 * Haha, it's like SAMPA's revenge. I hope we can delete any such "kludges". Equinox ◑ 11:15, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

Converted to hard redirect. —msh210℠ (talk) 05:38, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Actually, I don't object to this being a hard redirect to café, for the case that someone would really use "cafe'" as a search term. But "cafe'" should not show up in Alternative forms section of café. --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:28, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I could live with this being a hard redirect and being left out of café. If anyone ever confirms that it actually is a word in another language (presumably a language that uses the apostrophe as a letter), we can reconsider how to handle it at that time. - -sche (discuss) 01:56, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:cafe'


text:
pingeli

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to sole

title: pingeli


text:
जीरा

Etymology
, from. .

Noun

 * 1) cumin

title: जीरा


text:
Cadix

Proper noun

 * 1) commune in the Tarn Department in southern France.

Translations

 * French:

Etymology 1
, from, from , from , from.

Etymology 2
.

title: Cadix


text:
pingea

Etymology
, from.

Noun

 * 1) sole (bottom of a shoe)

title: pingea


text:
Talk:frictional blight

RFV discussion: June–October 2012
Sense: a plant disease. Added by anon. All citations I found were about urban geography. Ungoliant MMDCCLXIV 04:17, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
 * RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 08:42, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:frictional blight


text:
Talk:chrometophobia

RFV discussion: June–October 2012
Fear of money. As is common with phobias, only appears in word lists. Equinox ◑ 13:11, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
 * "He suffered from chrometophobia, the fear of money, a clinically documented disorder." (Moneymakers: the secret world of banknote printing - Page 17, Klaus W. Bender, 2006). I'll give it a full go before the month is up. Mglovesfun (talk) 08:36, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

 * Passes by the skin of its teeth, IMO. Restore the tag and reopen this discussion if you disagree. - -sche (discuss) 07:01, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:chrometophobia


text:
Talk:ℓ

RFV discussion: June 2012–February 2017
It says it is a symbol for litre (unit). AIUI, this is just a script version of the letter l. All Wikipedia says is that it is "sometimes used in mathematics and elsewhere" (e.g. ℓ-adic representations). Equinox ◑ 00:00, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I have definitely seen this in use... 00:41, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
 * It is a script version of l, but it's used, just like l is. It's tedious to search for, but one book suggests it's most common in the US, Japan and Greece. - -sche (discuss) 20:43, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

 * RFV-failed for now, sense (re)moved: the entry now says "script version of l", and "l" is an abbreviation for liter, so the information is still there, people just have to click through to [[l]]. - -sche (discuss) 05:10, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

I must say that the letter is also used in Thailand's appliances like cooking pot and measure cup. --Octahedron80 (talk) 05:44, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:ℓ


text:
Talk:supercock

RFV discussion: June–October 2012
"1. A large penis. 2. The quality of exceptionalism or talent." The given Penthouse citation is useless. Equinox ◑ 11:46, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The other citation doesn't demonstrate this meaning in particular. Could equally mean a very large male chicken. In reality it's probably a pejorative meaning dickhead, bastard, etc. Mglovesfun (talk) 11:55, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The citation from a 1973 issue of Penthouse originally given doesn't verify either sense 1 or 2, but there's a subsequent sentence in the same source that features a clear use of sense 1. The Penthouse writer assigns two meanings to "supercock", one reflecting sense 1, the other to "describe a man who knows what to do [with what he's got]" and is "a superlover as far as techniques are concerned." Which is a long way from the definition given in sense 2, and, even then, it's still an idiosyncratic meaning apparently used strictly by the Penthouse writer. Sense 2 should be removed. Sense 1, on the other hand, has been used outside the Penthouse source (found six other citations which feature it). There's also another sense referring to large male chickens. Astral (talk) 13:52, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

 * Passed. Thanks, Astral. - -sche (discuss) 04:04, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:supercock


text:
Talk:xéirifít

RFV discussion: June–October 2012
This may be a neologism in Irish... I can't find any uses of it in Google Books or Groups. - -sche (discuss) 18:08, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
 * has an unfortunate habit of adding theoretically correct but seemingly unattestable terms in Irish. --Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 16:11, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
 * RFV-failed for now. - -sche (discuss) 04:06, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

 * cite embryomystic (talk) 12:56, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I don't always trust tearma.ie not to make stuff up (coining words is part of Foras na Gaeilge's job), but this one is also in Ó Dónaill. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 15:01, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:xéirifít


text:
Talk:gesticulation

RFV discussion: June–October 2012
Rfv-sense: Antic tricks or motions. I know this was in Webster's 1913 and they cite a "B. Johnson", but it seems weird and I want to verify it anyway. —Internoob 22:59, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

 * According to Wiktionary, antic means "grotesque, bizarre; absurd."
 * The monkey busied himself with the boots, and the light-minded drunkard laughed; and at every fresh gesticulation of the new boot-wearer the laugh grew louder and more tremendous, till at length it was found impossible to restrain it.
 * They are all an essential part of the Shaker worship, and in authentication of it, they quote the fact of "Miriam and all the women going out with timbrels and with dances;" of "David's dancing before the ark," &c. &c. The manual gesticulation, too, which is incessant with them, is an act of worship, and justified by such passages as "glorify God in your body, and in your spirit," &c.
 *
 * I think these three fit, though I'm not too happy with the use of "antic" in the definition. --BB12 (talk) 06:39, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

 * I've changed the sense (or removed it and added a new sense, if you prefer). I think that resolves the matter...? Refine the definition and change "dated" to something stronger as needed. - -sche (discuss) 22:12, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:gesticulation


text:
Talk:abecedarian

RFV discussion: June–October 2012
Rfv-sense: A series of terms in an utterance in alphabetical order. Ƿidsiþ 06:50, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

 * A very interesting word with four interesting meanings! It looks citable:, , and probably . --BB12 (talk) 06:32, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

 * As a lover of word play (aren't we all?) I am familiar with this usage. While looking for a citation, I came across this which I do not regard as reliable but has yet another definition. Tesspub (talk) 18:33, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

 * Compare . - -sche (discuss) 18:45, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

 * Cited, IMO. - -sche (discuss) 21:57, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:abecedarian


text:
Talk:minacious

RFV
Rfv-sense: "Something which has a threatening or menacing character." Really? Since it's listed as uncountable, I tried searching for "some minacious" and found nothing. Mglovesfun (talk) 17:19, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The OED does say ‘also as a noun’, but none of their citations actually back it up (unless you count ‘a touch of the minacious’). Ƿidsiþ 17:21, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Are we perhaps talking about a misspelling of menacious, which has lots of mentions/cites? I cannot determine if any of them are durable.--Jacecar (talk) 01:14, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

 * RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 04:11, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Part of speech: adjective or noun
Here are the OED quotes, which both look to be nouns to me:
 * That which is threatening or menacing; threatening people regarded collectively. rare.
 * 1824  Blackwood's Edinb. Mag. 16 68   You have often a touch of the minaceous or so about you.
 * 1972  Mil. Law Rev. 55 (U.S. Dept. of Army) 148   Several cases have indicated a willingness to characterize the unruly and disrespectful with the minacious.

Also, not sure if this is a noun or not (William Oxberry - 1821):
 * It is said that his nurse, observing the priest very earnest and 'minaceous with him in his last moments, begged him not to be so harsh with her poor master, " who was more fool than knave ;" adding, " that God would not have the heart to damn ...

WilliamKF (talk) 16:56, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

 * I would say the Oxberry citation is an adjective; it's contrasted with "earnest", which is another adjective. The first two citations are a bit harder; it becomes a question of whether "the (adjective)" makes a noun. In some cases, we have noun entries for such constructions ([[poor]], [[Irish]]), in other cases, we don't. I'm not sure if there's consistency :/. - -sche (discuss) 21:36, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The kind of use of an adjective as a nominal is what some modern grammarians, eg CGEL pp. 410-22, would call a "fused-head" construction. Many adjectives can be used in that way. Sometimes the adjective is fused with a specific elided noun known from context. At other times the omission is of something less specific like ones, things, or people.
 * One really can't determine 'part of speech' or 'word class' from a small number of uses in English. Many English words in a given word class can be used as if they were members of a completely different one under some circumstances. Those adjectives that have truly become nouns can be modified by determiners, like many (for countable ones) or much (for uncountable ones), when being used without a directly associated noun. These can distinguish cases like many Irish are unhappy with austerity and the many poor have no choice..
 * Minaceous would not meet such a test AFAICT. I am open to other arguments and proposed tests. DCDuring TALK 22:54, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you for clarifying that! I'm glad to know there's a logic behind our having noun entries for [[poor]] and [[Irish]] and not some other terms, like this one. - -sche (discuss) 01:55, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Here are some more from Google books that might be noun usages:

 * ... extenuate (to make light), facundity (readiness of speech), gangrenous (likely to grow sore), herborize (to search for plants), indemnification (making up for a loss), lugubriousness (sadness), minaceous (using threats), obstruct (blocking up), ...
 * ... of which is almost as much in a state of nature called the more perfect plants, as trees, stirubs, gra- as any pait of England. It is in such situations, where minaceous and other herbs ; and not quite one him- the pruning and cultivating hand of ...

WilliamKF (talk) 15:20, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Why do you think these are noun uses? The first uses an adjective-like gloss to define. The second looks like bad scanning ("stirubs" for 'shrubs') and line breaks ("gra- as any pair", and "one him- the pruning").
 * Why not try the tests I suggested or check the various dictionaries at or the OED? DCDuring TALK  17:50, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The OED does list it as a noun form (the two quotes is gives are above), hence my concern that we get this right, as we are basically saying the OED is incorrect here, not something to be done lightly. WilliamKF (talk) 19:18, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
 * That's a good concern to have, but I do think they're in error here. As discussed in the archived RFV discussion, none of the OED's own citations use the word as a noun, so they're already making that mistake whether there are nounal uses to be found elsewhere or not... and it does seem there aren't. (The OED also includes words like Talk:wapacut and WT:RFV that aren't attested outside of other dictionaries, so this wouldn't be the first mistake they'd made.) - -sche (discuss) 19:42, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm comfortable with this particular divergence between OED's presentation and ours. I like to try to understand the PoV behind other dictionaries's choices of how to present things. In this case, I think they have gone too far, interpreting nominal use of an adjective as evidence that the word is a noun. I think they do this particular kind of thing often, as if they had to be utterly exhaustive in documenting instances of what others would say happens by rule.
 * We need to have better presentation of the grammatical "rules" that we claim allow us to say that a given term from one word that behaves in some small way like a member of another word class does not need to be put in that word class as well. Word-class labels really don't cause much change in user behavior, especially if there are usage examples. DCDuring TALK 22:33, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:minacious


text:
Talk:head of steam

RFV discussion: June–October 2012
Rfv-sense: "Stress".

There is another definition is from the "work up a head of steam" idiom. This is supposed to be different. DCDuring TALK 02:51, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 * If you you look at the edit history, head of steam was moved from "work up a head of steam", but attempts to convert the definitions to match the change in POS weren't done very well. This needs rewording to repair the damage, not verification. Chuck Entz (talk) 05:53, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The RFC comment says 'start from scratch', I agree with that, speedy delete the content and replace with a good entry. Mglovesfun (talk) 11:29, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

 * Sense removed. - -sche (discuss) 22:20, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

RFC discussion: June 2012
Def doesn't quite match quotation. (It's low in "substitutability".) —Ruakh TALK 02:28, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 * This started out as "work up a head of steam", created by WF, in typical WF fashion, in order to make use of the quote. It got moved to head of steam, but the POS-reassignment surgery to the definitions was botched. It's probably best to throw everything out and start fresh. Chuck Entz (talk) 04:50, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Substitutability problem was mainly a mismatch between countable definiendum and uncountable definiens. I have RfVed the second sense and added an etymology. Do with it what you will. DCDuring TALK 12:50, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:head of steam


text:
Talk:Ruinism

RFV discussion: June–October 2012
This is badly formatted but that's not really important right now. I thought this was an obvious protologism but a simple Google search turned up a wider variety of results than I expected. So I wonder if this may be attested after all, even if not with the sense given. 00:51, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

According to professional photographer, Gabriel Biderman, the term ruinism, which he uses, is "the beauty of decay" (see ruinism.com/about). It is arguable that the definition I have provided uses the same definition, but talking of decay in an artificial sense. If it would help for the purpose of achieving a better definition, I could alter my definition to include natural decay as well as artificial decay. I believe this would, therefore, prove that my article can be verified by Wiktionary's terms.
 * One use (or multiple dependent uses) isn't enough. That would make it a protologism. For WT:CFI it has to be in use by others, making it a neologism- which is proved by citations in at least 3 independent, durably-archived sources over more than a year Chuck Entz (talk) 03:01, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Most usage seems to be referring to something completely different, and in lowercase. I have created Citations:ruinism (I find the first citation to be extremely funny), but I haven't actually made ruinism yet because I don't know how to define it exactly. As for Ruinism, I can't find a single durable citation and I think it ought to be deleted rather soon. --Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 05:07, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

 * RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 04:15, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:Ruinism


text:
Talk:Jeffrey

RFV discussion: June–October 2012
Noun: (slang) £20,000.

If it is real, is it capitalized? This spelling? Etymology? Context? DCDuring TALK 14:48, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Also slang where? UK? Ireland? US? I've never heard of it but of course it might be UK, just not my part of the UK. Mglovesfun (talk) 19:07, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

 * UK - invented but does not seem to have caught on. You need to Google for Jeffrey Archer £2000 in order to understand it. (I would delete it) SemperBlotto (talk) 21:22, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I see. So, it should be "£2,000". It mimics US Benjamin "$100", etc. We could give it its 30 days here in case someone has some idea of how to find a pocket of attestable usage. DCDuring TALK 23:44, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

 * RFV-failed per Semper. - -sche (discuss) 01:44, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:Jeffrey


text:
Talk:araneicide

RFV discussion: June–October 2012
Substance that kills a spider. Seems like a "book word", vanishingly rare. Equinox ◑ 21:16, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
 * However, the word is found in a scientific article, Masked Chafers, Cyclopcephala pasadenae, Casey (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae), are Poisonous to Spiders, in the journal The Coleopterists Bulletin, published by the Coleopterists Society. It is also found in a PhD thesis entitled The life history and behaviour of the subsocial amaurobioid spider Badumna candida. Additionally, one can find the French version of the word here, denoting its similarity to insecticide, and here, an older French arthropod study entitled Histoire Naturelle, Générale et Particuliere, des Crustacés et des Insectes. Rare? Of course. The word has been found in English and French, as old as a public-domain French study and as recent as a 1992 study of Coleoptera toxin.—Giant SquidTalk 22:47, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
 * French would be aranéicide unless I'm mistaken. Mglovesfun (talk) 22:49, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, you're correct, which is why I said French version. It can be found here and here, exactly as you spell it. I was using the French version as a way of substantiating the word's existence.—Giant SquidTalk 22:53, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, good research, and I think we have some rule that accepts anything that's been in a sci paper. We should flag it as rare, at least, though. Equinox ◑ 22:54, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
 * That's very reasonable. —Giant SquidTalk 22:55, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
 * May I remove the tag then?—Giant SquidTalk 23:08, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Leave it for now, because we usually have to find three suitable citations. (The "one mention in a scientific paper" might overrule this, but just be patient.) Equinox ◑ 23:09, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Alright.—Giant SquidTalk 23:10, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
 * One use in a journal is no longer sufficient for inclusion (see Votes/pl-2010-11/Attestation in academic journals), but because it is used (rather than mentioned) in that journal, we only have to find two more uses. - -sche (discuss) 03:16, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

 * RFV-failed. Each sense had only one citation. - -sche (discuss) 20:41, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:araneicide


text:
Talk:sleepbound

RFV discussion: June–October 2012
Sense: "of or relating to a sleeping person or sleeping people". I don't think this can be right; sleep+bound seems like a poetic term for "bound by sleep", i.e. sleeping. "Relating to a sleeping person" sounds more suitable for some scientific term. Equinox ◑ 23:32, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

 * RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 04:16, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:sleepbound


text:
Talk:q.g.

RFV discussion: June–October 2012
Equinox ◑ 00:45, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

 * Cited. Also created (and cited) quod google. Astral (talk) 15:35, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

 * Passed. - -sche (discuss) 21:25, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:q.g.


text:
Talk:cupcake

RFV
Rfv-sense: (transitive, computing) To fail to properly perform a computer-related procedure; or, the failure of a computer hardware or software component. There are three cites but they don't meet the "spanning at least a year" rule. Any others? -- Liliana • 21:55, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

 * Also note dubious transitivity: "routers were cupcaked" does not support cupcake meaning "fail". Equinox ◑ 22:02, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

 * I tried to find something on Usenet with all sorts of combinations such as "was cupcaked" and "were * cupcaked," but nothing. --BB12 (talk) 22:58, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Mmm... cupcakes... Ahem, sorry. I notice that the first quote uses the verb intransitively. —Angr 15:58, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

 * RFV-failed for now. - -sche (discuss) 22:17, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

RFV 2
RFV of the verb, which was RFVed previously and failed, but was re-added recently. It's been a while since the last RFV, so more citations may have become available. Some are in Citations:cupcake, but: the Big Bang and Information Week citations support an intransitive sense meaning "fail", while the Network citation seems more like a transitive verb meaning "crash". All three are from the same year. - -sche (discuss) 00:56, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I don't know if you noticed but this edit removed a 2012 citation that is not on the citations page. This (just barely) gets a span of a year. Spinning Spark  09:00, 10 August 2013 (UTC) to 10:04, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I [//en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=Citations%3Acupcake&diff=21580217&oldid=18549506 removed] that citation because I can find no evidence that it is real rather than made-up, and it seems like it was faked (or perhaps genuinely written or transcribed) by someone who didn't speak English: "a obsolete", "can lengthy"... - -sche (discuss) 23:47, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The publication CFO Weekly Briefing does seem to exist but is not published online. I would be inclined to assume good faith and that the quote is poorly transcribed.  However, there could be some question of whether these newsletters are durably archived (they are sent out by e-mail), or even archived at all. Spinning Spark  09:59, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
 * This cite does not exactly support the given definition but would seem to be related
 * His aides—if they're any good, and I'/code>, so na. Mglovesfun (talk) 21:40, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
 * m sure they are—have acquired my identity hours ago and cupcaked me through half a dozen mil/pol databases in the time he and I have been away on the moors.
 * Not sure what it does mean though. Spinning Spark  09:58, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

 * Since "mil/pol databases" can't be found anywhere in a Google search, I suppose it's made-up "hacker" jargon. He must have got "cupcake" from somewhere though. Equinox ◑ 12:58, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
 * mil/pol is obviously shorthand for military/police- not a standard abbreviation, but the kind of thing one might do to save typing. Cupcake does seem out of place, though. Chuck Entz (talk) 13:49, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Agreed on mil/pol. The quote is from a work of fiction so one would not necessarily expect real databases to correspond to those in the plot.  The characters are not expected to be real people after all. Spinning Spark  18:17, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

 * RFV-failed again, by my ken. - -sche (discuss) 18:21, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Missing sense: fart prank
It's when you fart into your hand and open it up in someone's face. I could only find this citation in Google Books.

 * 2015, Michael Riddell, Same Dog, Different Shite
 * An oldie but goodie and de rigueur when one had bad gas was to catch your fart in your hand and chase my kids 'round the room with the said fart clenched in your fist, cornering the first available child and letting it go in their face, cupcake style. Rub it in their hair for bonus points.

Equinox ◑ 14:33, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

title: Talk:cupcake


text:
Talk:AMOL

RFV discussion: June–October 2012
Three independent citations please. SemperBlotto (talk) 07:04, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
 * RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 21:33, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:AMOL


text:
Talk:峰蜜

RFV discussion: June–October 2012
I found some hits in Google Books, but as far as I could see, they are all scannos of 蜂蜜. --Whym (talk) 08:27, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

 * I agree. It's possible that it could occur as a (recurring) typo, but that seems a little far-fetched. --BB12 (talk) 10:06, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

 * Delete. Looking more closely shows that the ZH entry here on the EN WT links through to the ZH WP article for 蜂蜜, with the first character of 蜂 ("bee"), not 峰蜜, with the first character of 峰 ("mountain peak").  Searching the ZH WP for 峰蜜 produces exactly three hits on two different pages, and in all cases, the 峰 looks like it belongs to the preceding phrase and the 蜜 to the succeeding phrase: 芳峰蜜香 ("fragrant mountain-peak honey smell") and 雪峰蜜桔 ("snowy mountain-peak honey tangerine").
 * Of the four items marked under the  header,

 * 1) is the ZH WP, but for the expected spelling of 蜂蜜 instead of the purported lemma of 峰蜜;
 * 2) is a dead-tree book that hasn't been scanned yet by Google, so I cannot verify;
 * 3) is a dead link to a non-existent PDF hosted on the website for Bhutan's Department of Trade;
 * 4) is a link to the Korean Traditional Knowledge Portal, which seems to be a Korean / Hanji > English glossary, but which also doesn't actually include the 峰蜜 term (but which does include the expected spelling 蜂蜜).
 * I think this entry fails on just about all counts of verifiability. -- Eiríkr Útlendi │ Tala við mig 16:37, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

 * RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 07:55, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:峰蜜


text:
Talk:session

RFV discussion: June–October 2012
Rfv-sense: (music) The performance of music by local musicians in a public place, with its origins in Gaelic culture. A musical performance broadcast for a radio show.

We may be missing a more central music sense for session, though I think it is included in the first sense, but I don't see anything that would restrict the use of the word to this sense. DCDuring TALK 12:23, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
 * We do need a sense for music, but not as the definition is at the moment. I'd suggest something like - "an informal get-together of musicians". While the Gaelic culture mention is reasonable, as the word is common in Ireland, I don't think it is specific enough to keep that part.--Dmol (talk) 06:01, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

 * RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 01:37, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

RFC discussion: June 2012–October 2017
The computing sense consists of five sentences. The music sense also seems a bit encyclopedic and PoV. The cricket sense is encyclopedic, belonging in a rulebook, not a dictionary. DCDuring TALK 11:36, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

 * Trimmed computing sense. That leaves cricket and music senses. Equinox ◑ 13:28, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

 * I've had a go at the cricket sense. The music sense seems to be a bit obscure, and misses the main music meaning as in session musician or session band. Spinning Spark  12:09, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I wish I knew what the contributor was getting at with the Gaelic bit. It seems encyclopedic. Does a WP article shed any light? Put it in the talk page? DCDuring TALK 12:15, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The gaming sense seems like a specific use of sense #1, could be rfd-redundant but in all honesty to me it's uncontroversial enough just to remove it. The cricket one probably is distinct from the other senses, I know what it means, I will reword it at some point (expecting visitors here, can't guarantee I can do it now). Mglovesfun (talk) 12:25, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I've removed the gaming sense, added a usex to the first sense to show music use, RfV'ed the existing music sense, and removed the rfc tag. DCDuring TALK 12:37, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

 * Looks much better now --P5Nd2 (talk) 13:18, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:session


text:
Talk:infocracy

RFV discussion: June–October 2012
"The democratization of user-generated information through social networking sites, etc." How can information be democratized? And how does rubbish like Facebook achieve anything? Citations welcome. Equinox ◑ 00:20, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Seconded; I don't even know what this means! Mglovesfun (talk) 17:35, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I would imagine that it means 'to place in the hands of the people', as opposed to 'in the hands of corporations or governments'. 15:00, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
 * But surely user-generated information is already in the hands of the people. —Angr 15:55, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

 * RFV-failed. The other sense could also stand to be improved. - -sche (discuss) 04:18, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Wiktionary Reference Citations

 * What is the proper format for inserting reference citations? Can someone fix the in-text cation in infocracy? Thanks. 141.213.172.104 01:01, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

title: Talk:infocracy


text:
Talk:Jython

RFV discussion: June–October 2012
This article needs citations. —This.
 * Even if we did somehow get three citations, it should probably get deleted by the RFD process. -- Liliana • 05:40, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 * If this isn't a brand name, it's at least akin to a specific entity that should really prove some legitimacy in its cites. DAVilla 01:54, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

 * RFV-failed for now. - -sche (discuss) 22:19, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

RFD discussion: March 2024
Specific software product, not a generic programming language. Was deleted before, has been re-added today. Equinox ◑ 01:17, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

 * Keep. It failed RFV in 2011, but I've added some cites showing it should pass WT:BRAND as a genericized trademark. I made a new RFV here. 195.146.4.192 01:38, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. Heyandwhoa (talk) 02:02, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I can't be 100% sure, because they're using proxies, but this IP looks very much like someone we've been playing Whack-a-Mole with for years: they're absolutely obsessed with blends, and are always trying to sneak in lame and poorly attested examples. You can be sure that they wouldn't know or care about this if it weren't a blend of Java and Python. I've now blocked their whole range- they've been working on cites for skinoe and skanoe with other IP addresses within the range. Chuck Entz (talk) 04:48, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
 * You are right on the money. — S URJECTION / T / C / L / 07:01, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

 * Let's not count keeps and deletes here, but remember our rules. Equinox ◑ 03:37, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

RFV-deleted, the quotes don't demonstrate genericization at all. PUC – 13:52, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

RFV discussion: March 2024
It failed RFV in 2011, but I've added some cites showing it passes WT:BRAND as a genericized trademark. 195.146.4.192 01:20, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

 * Those cites are not generic at all. Equinox ◑ 23:53, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

title: Talk:Jython


text:
زیرہ

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) cumin (short for زیرۂ سفید)
 * 2) caraway (short for زیرۂ سیاہ)

title: زیرہ


text:
ज़ीरा

Etymology
..

Noun

 * 1) cumin
 * 2) caraway
 * 1) caraway

title: ज़ीरा


text:
chișiță

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) pastern

title: chișiță


text:
red sauce

Noun

 * , as typically served in Italian cuisine, especially of southern Italy.
 * 1)  Tomato ketchup.

title: red sauce


text:
αποδιοπομπαίος

Adjective

 * 1) outcast, abominable

title: αποδιοπομπαίος


text:
αποκρουστικός

Etymology
From Hellenistic. The morden sense, a.

Adjective

 * 1) repellant, abominable, repulsive, obnoxious

title: αποκρουστικός


text:
kurorë

Etymology
From Old Albanian (preserved in Gheg), from. The sense marriage derives from Byzantine tradition.

Noun

 * 1) crown, garland
 * 2) marriage
 * 1) marriage

title: kurorë


text: crimony

title: crimony


text: Category:French terms derived from Phoenician


text: Category:Spanish terms derived from Phoenician


text: Category:Serbo-Croatian terms derived from Phoenician


text:
pajë

Etymology
Probably borrowed through from  <.

Noun

 * 1) trousseau
 * 2) dowry, bridewealth
 * 3) favor

title: pajë


text:
rrjetë

Etymology
Borrowed through from.

Noun

 * 1) net

title: rrjetë


text:
Talk:reoccur

Etymology
Only since 1817 has "reoccur" been floating around among the permissives, who regard preliminary rules and standards as "prescriptions" worthy of scorn, and who commend themselves as "descriptionists."

Witness the widespread contamination at Wikipedia too, by the peremptory prance of some of those there with Barnstars up the butt.

75.19.44.124 06:10, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:reoccur


text: γιδάκι

title: γιδάκι


text:
sherbelë

Etymology
Borrowed from, from.

Noun

 * 1)  sage

title: sherbelë


text: blīvākiem

title: blīvākiem


text:
fletë

Etymology
From, from (modern ). More at.

Noun

 * 1) wing
 * 2) battant (of a door), shutter
 * 3) fin (of fish)
 * 4) leaf
 * 5) sheet, page (of paper)

title: fletë


text:
veshtull

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) mistletoe

title: veshtull


text:
yoołmas

Etymology
.

Verb

 * 1) he/she/it is rolling it along

Usage notes
This is a progressive verb; it is conjugated only in the progressive mode.

Conjugation
.

title: yoołmas


text:
pluhur

Alternative forms

 * (Gheg)

Etymology
From, from.

Noun

 * 1) dust, powder
 * 2)  something that can hinder one's actions and sap one's vitality

Hyponyms

 * ‘chaff’
 * ‘pollen’
 * , ‘sawdust’

title: pluhur


text:
tortë

Etymology 1
Ultimately from. Perhaps borrowed via 🇨🇬. Compare 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) cake

Etymology 2
From, also in 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) rope

title: tortë


text: jiminy cricket

title: jiminy cricket


text:
abascantus

Adjective

 * 1) unenvied

title: abascantus


text: abascanta

title: abascanta


text: abascantum

title: abascantum


text: abascanti

title: abascanti


text: abascantae

title: abascantae


text: abascantorum

title: abascantorum


text: abascantarum

title: abascantarum


text: abascanto

title: abascanto


text: abascantis

title: abascantis


text: abascantam

title: abascantam


text: abascantos

title: abascantos


text: abascantas

title: abascantas


text: abascante

title: abascante


text: brīvākiem

title: brīvākiem


text: astronomiskākiem

title: astronomiskākiem


text: biezākiem

title: biezākiem


text: biežākiem

title: biežākiem


text: bioloģiskākiem

title: bioloģiskākiem


text: brūnganākiem

title: brūnganākiem


text:
abdicatrix

Noun

 * 1) renouncer (female)

title: abdicatrix


text:
abjungens

Etymology
Present participle of.

title: abjungens


text:
abjuncturus

Etymology
Future active participle of.

title: abjuncturus


text:
abjunctus

Etymology
Perfect passive participle of.

title: abjunctus


text:
abjungendus

Etymology
Future passive participle of.

title: abjungendus


text: abjungentes

title: abjungentes


text: abjungentia

title: abjungentia


text: abjungentis

title: abjungentis


text: abjungentium

title: abjungentium


text: abjungenti

title: abjungenti


text: abjungente

title: abjungente


text: abjungentibus

title: abjungentibus


text: abjungentem

title: abjungentem


text: abjunctura

title: abjunctura


text: abjuncturum

title: abjuncturum


text: abjuncturi

title: abjuncturi


text: abjuncturae

title: abjuncturae


text: abjuncturorum

title: abjuncturorum


text: abjuncturarum

title: abjuncturarum


text: abjuncturo

title: abjuncturo


text: abjuncturis

title: abjuncturis


text: abjuncturam

title: abjuncturam


text: abjuncturos

title: abjuncturos


text: abjuncturas

title: abjuncturas


text: abjuncture

title: abjuncture


text: abjuncta

title: abjuncta


text: abjunctum

title: abjunctum


text: abjuncti

title: abjuncti


text: abjunctae

title: abjunctae


text: abjunctorum

title: abjunctorum


text: abjunctarum

title: abjunctarum


text: abjuncto

title: abjuncto


text: abjunctis

title: abjunctis


text: abjunctam

title: abjunctam


text: abjunctos

title: abjunctos


text: abjunctas

title: abjunctas


text: abjuncte

title: abjuncte


text: abjungenda

title: abjungenda


text: abjungendum

title: abjungendum


text: abjungendi

title: abjungendi


text: abjungendae

title: abjungendae


text: abjungendorum

title: abjungendorum


text: abjungendarum

title: abjungendarum


text: abjungendo

title: abjungendo


text: abjungendis

title: abjungendis


text: abjungendam

title: abjungendam


text: abjungendos

title: abjungendos


text: abjungendas

title: abjungendas


text: abjungende

title: abjungende


text:
abiungens

Etymology
Present participle of.

Participle

 * 1) unharnessing

title: abiungens


text:
abiuncturus

Etymology
Future active participle of.

Participle

 * 1) about to unharness

title: abiuncturus


text:
abiungendus

Etymology
Future passive participle of.

Participle

 * 1) which is to be unharnessed

title: abiungendus


text: abiungentes

title: abiungentes


text: abiungentia

title: abiungentia


text: abiungentis

title: abiungentis


text: abiungentium

title: abiungentium


text: abiungenti

title: abiungenti


text: abiungente

title: abiungente


text: abiungentibus

title: abiungentibus


text: abiungentem

title: abiungentem


text: abiunctura

title: abiunctura


text: abiuncturum

title: abiuncturum


text: abiuncturi

title: abiuncturi


text: abiuncturae

title: abiuncturae


text: abiuncturorum

title: abiuncturorum


text: abiuncturarum

title: abiuncturarum


text: abiuncturo

title: abiuncturo


text: abiuncturis

title: abiuncturis


text: abiuncturam

title: abiuncturam


text: abiuncturos

title: abiuncturos


text: abiuncturas

title: abiuncturas


text: abiuncture

title: abiuncture


text: abiungenda

title: abiungenda


text: abiungendum

title: abiungendum


text: abiungendi

title: abiungendi


text: abiungendae

title: abiungendae


text: abiungendorum

title: abiungendorum


text: abiungendarum

title: abiungendarum


text: abiungendo

title: abiungendo


text: abiungendis

title: abiungendis


text: abiungendam

title: abiungendam


text: abiungendos

title: abiungendos


text: abiungendas

title: abiungendas


text: abiungende

title: abiungende


text:
yíłmáás

Etymology
.

The stem is cognate with, possibly from

Verb

 * 1) he/she rolls it, is rolling it

Conjugation
.

Verbal stems

 * ITERATIVE: -mas
 * OPTATIVE: -máás

title: yíłmáás


text:
abstrusio

Noun

 * 1) removing, concealing
 * 2) abstrusion

title: abstrusio


text:
acanthyllis

Noun

 * 1) A small songbird

title: acanthyllis


text:
accubitalia

Etymology
From or  and the neuter plural of.

Noun

 * 1) coverings spread over a table-couch

title: accubitalia


text:
outboob

Etymology
.

Verb

 * 1)  To have bigger breasts than.

title: outboob


text:
Citations:primitivization

 * 1986, K. Bailey, Human Paleopsychology: Applications To Aggression and Patholoqical Processes, page 78
 * A first step in developing such a miltidisciplinary, integrative formulation would be to view regression as a general process of primitivization, dissolution, hierarchial disintegration, and so on, which involves both phylogenetic and ontogenetic components.
 * 1990, Richard Cohen, Peter A. Wilson, Superpowers in economic decline: U.S. strategy for the transcentury era, page 74
 * Nonetheless, even before the end of 1988 it appeared that the Gorbachev initiative to reverse the process of primitivization had weakened.
 * 1997, Marvin Cohodas, Basket Weavers for the California Curio Trade: Elizabeth and Louise Hickox, page 50,
 * Besides masking its hierarchically organized inequalities and exploitations, the primitivization of the household legitimated similar relations of inequality in arenas of ethnicity and class--"tribe" being merely family writ large and racially or ethnically "othered."

title: Citations:primitivization


text:
zwielichtig

Adjective

 * 1) dubious, shady, twilighty

title: zwielichtig


text:
άποικος

Noun

 * 1) colonist
 * Οι Συρακούσες της Σικελίας ήταν αποικία των Κορινθίων.
 * Siracusa in Sicily was a colony of Corinth.
 * Η Μοζαμβίκη ήταν αποικία της Πορτογαλίας μέχρι το 1975.
 * Mozambique was a colony of Portugal until 1975.

title: άποικος


text:
primitivization

Noun

 * 1) The act of reducing something to a primitive state, allowing development, or regressing to an immature state.
 * The imperialist power practiced primitivization on its colonial possessions.

title: primitivization


text:
αποικιοκρατικός

Adjective

 * 1) relating to colonialism

title: αποικιοκρατικός


text:
αποικισμός

Noun

 * 1) colonial relating to colonies

title: αποικισμός


text:
αποικίζω

Verb

 * 1) to colonise, colonize

title: αποικίζω


text:
день варенья

Etymology
lit. 'jam day'. First attested in 1998. From a scene in ', a Russian cartoon adaptation of ' by, where Karlsson is wishing the boy a happy birthday while eating jam but, since the Russian rhymes with , he confuses the words and wishes him a happy jam day instead.

Noun

 * 1)  birthday

title: день варенья


text:
Thread:User talk:CodeCat/the new version of langprefix/reply (9)

I suppose all you say is true. If it weren't for those people up there, ... *shrug*


text:
there is reason in the roasting of eggs

Etymology
Attested since 17th century, according to the Oxford Books of Proverbs.

Proverb

 * 1) There is a reason behind even the most odd and seemingly unnecessary action.

title: there is reason in the roasting of eggs


text:
astral lamp

Noun

 * 1) An Argand lamp constructed so that no shadow is cast upon the table by the flattened ring-shaped oil reservoir.

title: astral lamp


text:
accubitatio

Noun

 * 1) a reclining (at meals)

title: accubitatio


text:
acerus

Adjective

 * 1) without wax (of free-flowing honey)

title: acerus


text: acerae

title: acerae


text: acerorum

title: acerorum


text: acerarum

title: acerarum


text: aceram

title: aceram


text:
acervalis

Adjective

 * 1) accumulated or heaped up

title: acervalis


text: acervale

title: acervale


text: acervales

title: acervales


text: acervalia

title: acervalia


text: acervalium

title: acervalium


text: acervali

title: acervali


text: acervalibus

title: acervalibus


text: acervalem

title: acervalem


text:
псыжъо

Etymology
From ; hence literally “boiling water”.

Noun

 * 1) boiling water

title: псыжъо


text:
пхъэтакъэ

Noun

 * 1) stump

title: пхъэтакъэ


text:
achilleos

Etymology
, supposedly having been discovered by him.

Noun

 * 1) milfoil, yarrow (or similar medicinal herb of the genus Achillea)

title: achilleos


text:
acopos

Etymology
Borrowed from, from.

Noun

 * 1) A stone (thought to be quartz or spar) supposed to ease fatigue

title: acopos


text:
acor

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) sourness (sour taste)

title: acor


text:
acrozymus

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) slightly leavened

title: acrozymus


text: acrozyma

title: acrozyma


text: acrozymum

title: acrozymum


text: acrozymi

title: acrozymi


text: מתימטיקה

title: מתימטיקה


text: acrozymae

title: acrozymae


text: acrozymorum

title: acrozymorum


text: acrozymarum

title: acrozymarum


text: acrozymo

title: acrozymo


text: acrozymis

title: acrozymis


text: acrozymam

title: acrozymam


text: acrozymos

title: acrozymos


text: acrozymas

title: acrozymas


text: acrozyme

title: acrozyme


text:
adaptans

Etymology
Present participle of.

Participle

 * 1) modifying, adapting

title: adaptans


text:
adaptaturus

Etymology
Future active participle of.

Participle

 * 1) about to modify, adapt

title: adaptaturus


text:
adaptatus

Etymology
Perfect passive participle of.

Participle

 * 1) modified, adapted

title: adaptatus


text:
adaptandus

Etymology
Future passive participle of.

Participle

 * 1) which is to be modified, adapted

title: adaptandus


text: adaptantes

title: adaptantes


text: adaptantia

title: adaptantia


text: adaptantis

title: adaptantis


text: adaptantium

title: adaptantium


text: adaptanti

title: adaptanti


text: adaptantibus

title: adaptantibus


text: adaptantem

title: adaptantem


text: adaptatura

title: adaptatura


text: adaptaturum

title: adaptaturum


text: adaptaturi

title: adaptaturi


text: adaptaturae

title: adaptaturae


text: adaptaturorum

title: adaptaturorum


text: adaptaturarum

title: adaptaturarum


text: adaptaturo

title: adaptaturo


text: adaptaturis

title: adaptaturis


text: adaptaturam

title: adaptaturam


text: adaptaturos

title: adaptaturos


text: adaptaturas

title: adaptaturas


text: adaptature

title: adaptature


text: adaptatum

title: adaptatum


text: adaptati

title: adaptati


text: adaptatae

title: adaptatae


text: adaptatorum

title: adaptatorum


text: adaptatarum

title: adaptatarum


text: adaptatam

title: adaptatam


text: adaptatos

title: adaptatos


text: adaptatas

title: adaptatas


text: adaptanda

title: adaptanda


text: adaptandum

title: adaptandum


text: adaptandi

title: adaptandi


text: adaptandae

title: adaptandae


text: adaptandorum

title: adaptandorum


text: adaptandarum

title: adaptandarum


text: adaptandis

title: adaptandis


text: adaptandam

title: adaptandam


text: adaptandos

title: adaptandos


text: adaptandas

title: adaptandas


text: adaptande

title: adaptande


text:
пӏастӏэ

Noun

 * 1) oatmeal
 * 2) porridge

title: пӏастӏэ


text:
adelphis

Etymology
Borrowed from.

Noun

 * 1) type of date (that hangs in pairs)

title: adelphis


text:
adiuratio

Etymology
From the past participle stem of.

Noun

 * 1) swearing (to something)
 * 2) adjuration

title: adiuratio


text: adjuratio

title: adjuratio


text: adjurator

title: adjurator


text: adiuratores

title: adiuratores


text: adiuratoris

title: adiuratoris


text: adiuratorum

title: adiuratorum


text: adiuratori

title: adiuratori


text: adiuratoribus

title: adiuratoribus


text: adiuratorem

title: adiuratorem


text: adiuratore

title: adiuratore


text:
adusque

Adverb

 * 1) wholly, completely

Preposition

 * 1) all the way to; as far as

title: adusque


text:
advocamentum

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) legal assistance; counsel
 * 2) delay, adjournment
 * 3) consolation

title: advocamentum


text: auder

title: auder


text:
halneʼ

Etymology
.

Verb

 * 1) he/she is
 * 2) he/she is talking about, recounting, telling about (is used with  “about” and  “to whom”)
 * 3) he/she is interpreting, translating
 * 4) (with ) he/she explains it (the object is referred by )
 * 1) he/she is interpreting, translating
 * 2) (with ) he/she explains it (the object is referred by )

Conjugation
.

Related terms

 * IMPERFECTIVE: -neʼ
 * PERFECTIVE: -neʼ
 * FUTURE: -nih
 * ITERATIVE: -nih
 * OPTATIVE: -neʼ

title: halneʼ


text:
aeditua

Noun
(Masculine: aedituus)

 * 1) a female sacristan (custodian of a temple)

title: aeditua


text:
aeditualis

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1)  sacristan

title: aeditualis


text: aedituale

title: aedituale


text: aedituales

title: aedituales


text: aeditualia

title: aeditualia


text: aeditualium

title: aeditualium


text: aedituali

title: aedituali


text: aeditualibus

title: aeditualibus


text: aeditualem

title: aeditualem


text:
aegror

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) illness, sickness, disease

title: aegror


text:
aegrotaticius

Adjective

 * 1) sickly (often ill)

title: aegrotaticius


text: aegrotaticia

title: aegrotaticia


text: aegrotaticium

title: aegrotaticium


text: aegrotaticii

title: aegrotaticii


text: aegrotaticiae

title: aegrotaticiae


text: aegrotaticiorum

title: aegrotaticiorum


text: aegrotaticiarum

title: aegrotaticiarum


text: aegrotaticio

title: aegrotaticio


text: aegrotaticiis

title: aegrotaticiis


text: aegrotaticiam

title: aegrotaticiam


text: aegrotaticios

title: aegrotaticios


text: aegrotaticias

title: aegrotaticias


text: aegrotaticie

title: aegrotaticie


text:
aenitologium

Noun

 * 1) a dactylic verse with an iambic penthemimeris

title: aenitologium


text:
penthemimeris

Etymology
, from : +  +

Noun

 * 1)  A prosal group of two and a half feet.

title: penthemimeris


text:
aequilibris

Etymology
.

Adjective

 * 1) in perfect equilibrium
 * 2) level, horizontal

title: aequilibris


text: aequilibre

title: aequilibre


text: aequilibres

title: aequilibres


text: aequilibri

title: aequilibri


text: aequilibribus

title: aequilibribus


text: aequilibrem

title: aequilibrem


text:
jzr

Etymology
According to the Rösslerian school of Egyptian comparison, cognate with 🇨🇬 (whence ).

Noun

 * 1) tamarisk

title: jzr


text:
aequilibritas

Etymology
. Coined by Cicero as a translation of the epicurean.

Noun

 * 1) equal distribution of the powers of nature, equilibrity

title: aequilibritas


text:
aeruca

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) verdigris, patina

title: aeruca


text:
speltti

Etymology
Borrowed from, itself from , from , from.

Noun

 * 1) spelt type of wheat, or

title: speltti


text:
jspt

Etymology 1
Borrowed from or a cognate Semitic word. Later reanalysed as a root +.

Noun

 * 1) quiver for archery

Usage notes
This word was masculine during the Middle Kingdom but had become feminine by the Late Kingdom.

Noun

 * 1) language

title: jspt


text: Category:egy:Weapons

title: Category:egy:Weapons


text:
ꜣst

Proper noun

 * 1) Isis, an important goddess associated with magic and motherhood

Alternative forms
Some authors interpret this name as rather than. Formerly it was sometimes read as, but this reading is no longer accepted.

title: ꜣst


text:
digeeh

Etymology
.

Verb

 * 1) he/she is falling (from a standing position), tripping

Conjugation
.

Related terms

 * IMPERFECTIVE: -geeh
 * PERFECTIVE: -goʼ
 * FUTURE: -goh
 * ITERATIVE: -goh
 * OPTATIVE: -geeh

title: digeeh


text:
jꜣkbyt

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) mourning-woman

title: jꜣkbyt


text: brūnīgākiem

title: brūnīgākiem


text: chucks a sickie

title: chucks a sickie


text: chucking a sickie

title: chucking a sickie


text:
aktīvākos

Adjective

title: aktīvākos


text: chucked a sickie

title: chucked a sickie


text:
pasīvākos

Adjective

title: pasīvākos


text:
chuck a sickie

Etymology
A more slangy variant of.

Verb

 * 1)  To take a day off from work feigning ill health.
 * 2) * 2010, Veechi Curtis, Lynley Averis, Bookkeeping For Dummies, Australian & New Zealand Edition, |chucks|chucking|chucked+a+sickie%22+-intitle:%22%22+-inauthor:%22%22&source=bl&ots=p7Y2FFsv1T&sig=ikFfCUgB14M4NWli9Dl7ZI5C13Q&hl=en&sa=X&ei=MLaDUK21DYTpiAepmoDIBg&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=%22chuck|chucks|chucking|chucked%20a%20sickie%22%20-intitle%3A%22%22%20-inauthor%3A%22%22&f=false page 180,
 * For example, if an employee chucks a sickie, you need to check that they have enough sick leave available.
 * 1) * 2010, Eve Brenac-Mooney, Kaleidoscope, Ebrem, Australia, 2012 EPUB edition, |chucks|chucking|chucked+a+sickie%22+-intitle:%22%22+-inauthor:%22%22&source=bl&ots=0mRF83m-c2&sig=hdPG0quxz6mMVawgpWGJSXOR6sQ&hl=en&sa=X&ei=MLaDUK21DYTpiAepmoDIBg&redir_esc=y unnumbered page,
 * I wished I could chuck a sickie, but it was only my second day at Forest Glen, so that was out of the question.

Synonyms

 * ,, see also Thesaurus:shirk

Translations

 * Maori: whakangehengehe
 * Russian: сказаться больным

title: chuck a sickie


text:
blīvākos

Adjective

title: blīvākos


text:
brīvākos

Adjective

title: brīvākos


text:
jꜥn

Etymology
One early writing of the word shows the form, which Erman and Grapow take to represent the earliest known form of the word; however, Vycichl considers this a pseudo-archaic secondary development, since none of the known plural forms conserve the consonant in this position.

Noun

 * 1) (male) baboon

Alternative forms
The determinative of the baboon  may be replaced with one depicting only its head. As an epithet of Thoth, the word additionally appears with determinatives indicating godhood:

Proper noun

 * 1) a constellation, the Baboon

Alternative forms
See under the noun above.

title: jꜥn


text:
astronomiskākos

Adjective

title: astronomiskākos


text:
biezākos

Adjective

title: biezākos


text:
biežākos

Adjective

title: biežākos


text:
diidiłjeeh

Navajo
.

Lit. to lay them (wood sticks) into fire.

Verb

 * 1) he/she is making it, starting it, building it (a fire)

Conjugation
.

Related terms

 * IMPERFECTIVE: -jeeh
 * PERFECTIVE: -jééʼ
 * FUTURE: -jah
 * ITERATIVE: -jah
 * OPTATIVE: -jeeh

title: diidiłjeeh


text:
bioloģiskākos

Adjective

title: bioloģiskākos


text:
brūnganākos

Adjective

title: brūnganākos


text:
brūnīgākos

Adjective

title: brūnīgākos


text: pasīvāki

title: pasīvāki


text: pasīvākus

title: pasīvākus


text: pasīvākai

title: pasīvākai


text: blīvākai

title: blīvākai


text: blīvākus

title: blīvākus


text: blīvāki

title: blīvāki


text: brīvāki

title: brīvāki


text: brīvākus

title: brīvākus


text: brīvākai

title: brīvākai


text: biezāki

title: biezāki


text: biezākus

title: biezākus


text: biezākai

title: biezākai


text: biežāki

title: biežāki


text: biežākus

title: biežākus


text: biežākai

title: biežākai


text: aktīvāko

title: aktīvāko


text: pasīvāko

title: pasīvāko


text: blīvāko

title: blīvāko


text: brīvāko

title: brīvāko


text: astronomiskāko

title: astronomiskāko


text: biezāko

title: biezāko


text: bābude

title: bābude


text: biežāko

title: biežāko


text:
yinaalnish

Etymology
.

Verb

 * 1) he/she is working on it

Conjugation
.

Verbal stems

 * IMPERFECTIVE: -nish
 * PERFECTIVE: -nish
 * FUTURE: -nish
 * ITERATIVE: -nish
 * OPTATIVE: -nish

title: yinaalnish


text: bioloģiskāko

title: bioloģiskāko


text: brūnganāko

title: brūnganāko


text: Wiktionary:Foreign Word of the Day/2012/December 31


text:
Talk:βαίνω

According to ancient Greek dictionaries such as the one given as reference for βαίνω (Henry George Liddell, Robert Scott). The future of βαίνω is βήσομαι and the aorist ἔβην and (ἔβησα when βαίνω is transitive)... Could we get more reference on alternative future βήσω given in the main Entry page?

 * I'm not seeing much evidence for βήσω, so I'll go ahead and remove it. My suspicion is that it was a rare/later form, and will eventually be re-added, but I have no evidence which justifies keeping it at this point.  -Atelaes λάλει ἐμοί 22:10, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Can someone redo the alternative syncopated perfect stem in βεβα-? I think the inflectional tables are haywire. Recap: βεβα- is used in the indicative active dual and plural, the active optative, the active imperative, and the active infinitive, which also sports the alternate perfect active infinitive endings βεβάμεν and βεβάναι.
 * There's only a few forms attested, and the formation does not seem to be regular; accordingly I've only included the attested forms. ObsequiousNewt (ἔβαζα|ἐτλέλεσα) 16:03, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
 * I think the formation is regular if regarded in I.-E. terms, in which the perfect dual and plural take the zero-grade stem, whose reflex in Greek is βεβα-.99.231.62.104 08:13, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

title: Talk:βαίνω


text: brūnīgāko

title: brūnīgāko


text: 組み合わせ

title: 組み合わせ


text:
Wiktionary talk:Todo/context outside of definitions

Letter
listed under 'letter' is correct, as all the usages of are on definition lines. Mglovesfun (talk) 12:54, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Re-run

 * Once Mewbot finishes putting in front of all context labels, it should be possible to make a list of misused context labels by looking for uses of  not immediately preceded by (# |#). - -sche (discuss) 18:48, 7 June 2013 (UTC)


text:
組合せ

Noun

 * 1) a combination

title: 組合せ


text: aktīvākie

title: aktīvākie


text: pasīvākie

title: pasīvākie


text: blīvākie

title: blīvākie


text: brīvākie

title: brīvākie


text: astronomiskākie

title: astronomiskākie


text: biezākie

title: biezākie


text: biežākie

title: biežākie


text: bioloģiskākie

title: bioloģiskākie


text: oud en nieuw

title: oud en nieuw


text: brūnganākie

title: brūnganākie


text: brūnīgākie

title: brūnīgākie


text:
組み合わせる

Verb

 * 1) combine, join together

title: 組み合わせる


text:
nnw

Noun

 * 1) inertness, rigor mortis

Noun

 * 1) the hidden, lost, perpetually dark, infinite primeval waters
 * 2) Nu, father of the gods, the divine anthropomorphisation of the primeval waters, a member of the Ogdoad.

Alternative forms
The reading of this term is extremely uncertain; various authors have proposed, , , , , and , among other interpretations.

title: nnw


text: Wiktionary:Foreign Word of the Day/2012/December 5


text: Wiktionary:Foreign Word of the Day/2012/December 6


text: Wiktionary:Foreign Word of the Day/2012/December 21


text: Wiktionary:Foreign Word of the Day/2012/October 30


text:
ద్రౌపది

Etymology
From

Proper noun

 * 1)  daughter of Drupada.
 * Draupadi, common wife of Pandavas in Mahabharata.

title: ద్రౌపది


text: Wiktionary:Foreign Word of the Day/2012/October 28


text: Wiktionary:Foreign Word of the Day/2012/October 29


text:
అక్షయపాత్ర

Noun

 * 1) vessel that gives unlimited food
 * 2) horn of plenty, cornucopia

title: అక్షయపాత్ర


text:
hedersam

Etymology
From, equivalent to +

Adjective

 * 1) honorable

title: hedersam


text: Ablegers

title: Ablegers


text:
県庁

Noun

 * 1) prefectural office

title: 県庁


text:
老朽化

Noun

 * 1) deterioration

Verb

 * 1) wear out

title: 老朽化


text:
厳重

Adjective

 * 1) strict

Noun

 * 1) rigor

title: 厳重


text:
老朽

Adjective

 * 1) old and useless; decrepit

Pronoun

 * 1)  I, the old and infirm

Adjective

 * 1) dilapidated, old
 * 2) senile

Noun

 * 1) dilapidation
 * 2) senility

title: 老朽


text: Balkens

title: Balkens


text: seriöser

title: seriöser


text: seriösesten

title: seriösesten


text:
ungrated

Adjective

 * 1) Not grated or ground up.
 * 2) Not fitted with a grate.
 * an ungrated fireplace
 * an ungrated fireplace

title: ungrated


text:
案ずるより産むが易し

Etymology
, "Giving birth is easier than worrying (about it)."

Proverb

 * 1) Doing something is easier than worrying about it.

title: 案ずるより産むが易し


text:
Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/glewbʰ-

Root

 * 1) to split

Derived terms

 * *gléwbʰ-e-ti
 * *glúbʰ-e-ti
 * *glowbʰ-éye-ti
 * *glewbʰ-m-eh₂
 * *gléwbʰ-ti-s ~ *glubʰ-téy-s
 * *glubʰ-on-
 * *glowbʰ-éye-ti
 * *glewbʰ-m-eh₂
 * *gléwbʰ-ti-s ~ *glubʰ-téy-s
 * *glubʰ-on-
 * *gléwbʰ-ti-s ~ *glubʰ-téy-s
 * *glubʰ-on-
 * *glubʰ-on-
 * *glubʰ-on-

Unsorted derivations:


text:
furniture music

Etymology
, coined by in 1917.

Noun

 * 1)  Background music originally played by live performers.

title: furniture music


text:
tumbarse a la bartola

Verb

 * 1)  to laze about; loaf; mope

title: tumbarse a la bartola


text:
Wiktionary:Votes/2012-10/Enabling Tabbed Languages

Enabling Tabbed Languages

 * Voting on: Enabling Tabbed Languages by default. (Testable using Special:Preferences, "Enable Tabbed Languages.")

 * Vote starts: 00:01, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Vote ends: 23:59, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

 * Vote created: Yair rand (talk) 14:29, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Discussion:
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] WT:BP
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] WT:Beer parlour archive/2011/June
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] WT:Beer parlour archive/2011/November
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] WT:Beer parlour archive/2011/December
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] Wiktionary talk:Votes/2012-10/Enabling Tabbed Languages

Support

 * 1) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support Yair rand (talk) 02:00, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Once problems are fixed (those described by Ruakh in the BP poll that preceded this vote, and others. For example, a bot should be set in place to edit pages even only to place categories in the correct sections, both from recentchanges and from allpages or a dump, if none does now). —msh210℠ (talk) 06:52, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The one I mention above is a deal-breaker AFAI'm concerned: no bot moving cats, this shouldn't go forward. Likewise Ruakh's things that I refer to (moving lede content into language sections and making plain links link to English sections from other languages'). This is an oppose vote until such are implemented. Another thing that should be done (but isn't a deal-breaker, since it affects only editors, not readers) is that on saving a section-edit, the view should revert to that section and not the first. Another is that the tabbed layout be made to load sooner if possible (per Dan P.'s comment, below, of 12:31, 27 October 2012 (UTC)). —msh210℠ (talk) 07:57, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I've disabled the category edit tool. Re section-editing, as far as I can tell it has always been the case that the user is brought to the section they just finished editing. A category placement bot and lede fixes can't be implemented until the results of this vote are clear. --Yair rand (talk) 09:10, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support  12:58, 22 October 2012 (UTC) But we should make lang= mandatory for linking templates like, as it causes usability issues with tabbed languages otherwise.  12:58, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support, once we make various needed changes. —Ruakh TALK 13:40, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support. — Ungoliant (Falai) 22:22, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 20:56, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support.  It's great. This, that and the other (talk) 06:52, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support Liliana • 18:52, 12 November 2012 (UTC) it's hard to go through beta testing without a public test phase. This is something that has been needed for years now. -- Liliana • 18:52, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support. Yes, there are problems, and they should be solved (before implementation if possible, but I'm OK with it happening later too). I note that, as someone commented elsewhere, most Wiktionary pages only have one language and won't be terribly affected by this change anyway. Only the big pages like water or a will be really affected, and as far as I can tell for the better. --Pereru (talk) 09:15, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Sounds important. Maybe someone can determine the exact number of entries with and without multiple L2 titles? (i.e., entries with one or multiple languages) --Daniel 10:34, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support Bequw → τ 16:34, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support Dan Polansky (talk) 18:15, 21 November 2012 (UTC). I am switching to support, as I believe this is an issue that should be decided by a plain majority, given enough voters have taken part on the vote. --Dan Polansky (talk) 18:15, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support DTLHS (talk) 18:16, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support. I enabled them for me long ago. --Vahag (talk) 18:34, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support. Matthias Buchmeier (talk) 12:50, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) Symbol support vote.svg Support. —Angr 06:51, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) Symbol support vote.svg Support but no sooner than the sysop making the switch is assured that there will not be wholesale breakage, per the objections raised. DAVilla 05:08, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Symbol support vote.svg Support but no sooner than the sysop making the switch is assured that there will not be wholesale breakage, per the objections raised. DAVilla 05:08, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose  DCDuring TALK  03:24, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
 * We have always had RhS ToC available, which yields the purported advantage of this proposal.
 * This in no way solves the increasingly debilitating performance problems that we are increasingly suffering as our coverage of languages grows and use of our Rococo template system continues. If this proposal somehow relieved the server of the burden of transcluding templates for content that a given user is not interested in, like any translation tables, extended lists of cognates, or any but selected L2 sections, I could support it. #: I fear that it will end by worsening these problems. I am not impressed with the results of the radical reforms that have been imposed in the past. DCDuring TALK 18:04, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
 * IMO, this isn't meant to improve performance, but instead to improve layout. When I look at WT:FB or scholarly analyses of Wiktionary's merits as a usable dictionary, I see complaints about aesthetic details often, but I can't remember ever having seen a complaint about loading times. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 23:36, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
 * It is the massive use of templates instead of plainlinks required to the links from the tab for a language section one one page to go to the correct tab on another page that will be killing performance, AFAICT. I think almost all plainlinks to principal namespace will have to be replaced by, or similar. If each instance of those requires a performance-sapping template-existence test to get language (and script) right, the loading performance of [[water]] (which uses  to the same effect) will become the norm for all large pages. A dictionary needs to have reasonably fast performance to be attractive to users. We will definitely not have fast performance with our current architecture. Tabbed languages will worsen performance by forcing more use of templates. If the template architecture could be replaced by something less kludgey (Will Lua save us?), perhaps tabbed languages could work. DCDuring TALK  01:53, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
 * To test whether makes a difference, get a timer and compare loading time for Requested entries (English) (current version), which does not have, with that for User:Ruakh/Test, which is a copy of the same page before  was removed. I get a huge difference, but YMMV. DCDuring TALK  19:10, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose Dan Polansky (talk) 20:12, 25 October 2012 (UTC). While I acknowledge that our TOC is needlessly long and detailed, the tabbed languages option seems to make it too obscure to the reader of Wiktionary that there is in fact one underlying wiki page for all the languages. The TOC problem can be solved. I have a CSS that shows TOC most often as one line containing only the names of languages. You can try it out:
 * /* Use simple horizontal TOC */
 * .ns-0 table#toc li { display: inline; }
 * .ns-0 table#toc li + li:before { content: ' · '; }
 * .ns-0 div#toctitle { display: none; }
 * .ns-0 table#toc { border-color: #DDDDFF; border-right: none; border-left: none; background-color: white; padding-top: 0px; }
 * --Dan Polansky (talk) 20:12, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Why is it valuable that our readers know there's one underlying wiki page for all the languages? —msh210℠ (talk) 05:35, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't really know. I kind of sense that it is valuable. I find it confusing when too much of what is going on underneath is obscured. I like wiki markup and prefer it to what-you-see-is-what-you-get editing variant of Wiktionary, should someone come up with such a thing.
 * On another note, I don't like how the tabs are at the left rather than at the top.
 * Furthermore, I do not see how section editing is possible with the tabbed languages enabled. Thus, while the read-only interface pretends there is a separate page dedicated to a single language, the editing interface no longer makes it possible to edit content relating to a single language. However, chances are I just haven't figured out how to edit a single language in the new tabbed language interface.
 * Moreover, when editing a page and making a preview, I see non-tabbed language appearance; I think it confusing to have the two appearances, depending on what one is doing. --Dan Polansky (talk) 12:23, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
 * When I enter a page such as cat, I see the non-tabbed wiki appearence for a short while after which it gets switched to the tabbed interface. Ugly. --Dan Polansky (talk) 12:31, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Last month I changed the script so that users of small screens (width less than 580px) get the tabs on top instead of at the side, but in general I think at the side is probably better. There's a section edit button at the top-right corner, just above the tab's top border. The preview problem is caused by a bug that was introduced with a Mediawiki upgrade some months ago. If the bug isn't fixed on the Mediawiki end before it's time to deploy, I'll add a temporary workaround to fix it. --Yair rand (talk) 18:30, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Actually, I'll just add the preview workaround now. Fixed. --Yair rand (talk) 19:50, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The appearance of the non-tabbed display for a bit before switching is due to the fact that loading and running gadgets from the top is not allowed by Mediawiki yet. Hopefully bug 27488 will be fixed at some point... --Yair rand (talk) 04:38, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
 * What do you think of the delay now? I just made a change (which happens to come with some problems that I'm not sure how I'll fix) which might improve things significantly. --Yair rand (talk) 10:42, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
 * There is still a delay at cat. It looks a bit different from what it was before, but a delay is still there. I am using Firefox on Windows Vista. --Dan Polansky (talk) 10:55, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Are you using the gadget version? That's the only one I applied the change to. Does it at any point display the standard table of contents? --Yair rand (talk) 11:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I think I am using the gadget version: I have enabled the thing via preferences. cat does not display the standard TOC at any point; it does display the cat image of the English entry, however. It shows the bars more horizontally distant than they should be, for a short while; it did not do this before. --Dan Polansky (talk) 11:06, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Okay, so here's the situation: JS currently doesn't have any way to run until the page is finished loading, and the page pretty much loads bit by bit, displaying the contents as they come in. This results in the non-TL format being displayed for a bit. What I was thinking might be a temporary solution until a fix for bug 27488 allows the JS to run earlier, would be to have CSS, which runs before the content is loaded, immediately fiddle with how the TOC will be displayed when it comes in, so that it looks like tabs until TL JS runs and makes the actual tabs and removes the TOC. This would allow it to look close enough to correct most of the time (but not when the user goes straight to a lower section, which is unfortunate). Since the TOC's list is also made up of links, the user could even click on them and have TL act on it once the page is finished loading. In your case, it was messing up a bit more than usual due to your TOC-modifying CSS that I had forgotten about despite you mentioning it in this very thread. (Sorry about that.) --Yair rand (talk) 15:31, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose  --Daniel 18:27, 27 October 2012 (UTC) Pretty, but... controversial. Maybe I'd support it when the project makes it past the beta stage. --Daniel 18:27, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose at this time, given that even many of the voters who support it do so conditionally and noting its many problems. I'd rather those issues be solved first. - -sche (discuss) 19:00, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
 * One complication with that line of reasoning is that some of those "problems"/"issues" are debatable if we don't intend to turn on Tabbed Languages. For example — right now we have a lot of links that point to entire entries rather than to specific sections. If we're not planning to enable Tabbed Languages, then are those links something that can (or should) be "solved"? If such issues prevent us from even making the decision to turn on Tabbed Languages, then we might have a Catch-22. —Ruakh TALK 18:46, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Good point. And while I agree with much of what DCDuring says, above, I don't think some users' desire to use in ever more places will or should be affected by the outcome of this vote: it's just as useful for users of non-tabbed browsing to be sent to the right section of a page as it is for TB users to be so sent, and the IMO triflingly minor inconvenience of not being sent immediately to the right section is no worse for TB users than non-TB users if we, as I prefer, continue to use plain wikilinking. So I abstain. - -sche (discuss) 23:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I suppose it wouldn't be so bad where were not so expensive. If  or a replacement for it simply went to the L2 section if it existed and to the first L2 section if it did not and did not carry all the look-up-other-templates baggage, the performance penalty that it imposes would be virtually eliminated. DCDuring TALK  05:41, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I actually proposed removing the extra baggage from that template some time ago (it doesn't need gender, gloss etc. if all it does is make links), but it was opposed. 14:18, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Perhaps we need an alternative one-letter template that can replace when appropriate. DCDuring TALK  15:45, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
 * We could use subtemplates like for all languages. — Ungoliant (Falai) 16:19, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Assuming that is indeed less taxing on the database, which it seems to be, let's do that! - -sche (discuss) 17:55, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I do think that would be a good idea, but how would we make sure that such a subtemplate exists for every language? Should we add it to so it can automatically check?  18:20, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
 * We should have a bot create all of them, to make checking unnecessary. — Ungoliant (Falai) 18:32, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I see DCDuring has created . I think it is desirable to have the linking template check for script, etc, so that the text can be displayed in font that can handle it, so I think Ungoliant's idea of, etc, is better than either or . And I agree, creating the subtemplates should be bot-able. - -sche (discuss) 19:36, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I think I need to understand why it is so important to check for script. I am obviously not on the same page with many folks here. What is the trauma caused by a failure of (a failure of, the incredibly simple-minded template that only speeds the creation of L2 section links (the same syntax as the most common use of )? DCDuring TALK  19:43, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose -- Gauss (talk) 17:54, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose -- SemperBlotto (talk) 11:44, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose  --WikiTiki89 11:55, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose  Ƿidsiþ 07:41, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Support but not right now. DAVilla 05:43, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
 * When, then? After the issues mentioned above are resolved? I fully realize that TL is in no state to be pushed site-wide right now (especially since I've been experimenting on it over the last little while, and there's still no disable button, and we still haven't made the necessary formatting changes to certain pages) but I don't think this vote passing would mean that it has to be enabled right away. --Yair rand (talk) 06:00, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I'll hold you to that. DAVilla 05:06, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Decision
Fails 13–6–0 (68%). —msh210℠ (talk) 19:22, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I will not argue the point if I can help it, but votes have passed at 68% before. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 19:24, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
 * 68% is a pass as far as I know. 19:24, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I opposed this proposal before abstaining; I'm no fan of TL. Even I have to say this proposal passes: depending on how you (msh210) read your vote of "This is an oppose vote until such are implemented", either 2/3 or slightly more than 2/3 of those voting supported the proposal. - -sche (discuss) 20:31, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Does is take more than 2/3 or more than 3/4 for a pass on a non-constitutional matter like this? DCDuring TALK 20:49, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
 * In past investigations of passage thresholds, it has been established that nothing has ever required 3/4 support to pass. It's been said that, years ago, 70% was used as a threshold in some votes, but I can't offhand find an example, if one exists. I like some leeway (does 60% pass? depends on how major the vote is), but I don't think "a non-constitutional matter" (as two of you refer to it) like this—a vote on turning on by default a script that many users have already enabled, and which opponents can disable—can be rejected despite having two-to-one support. I note that, if construed as a vote, the "vote" on how to close this vote (!!) is currently 3/4 in favour of "it passes"... :P - -sche (discuss) 21:04, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I was thinking (when I closed this) that 70% passes. If we say 2/3 passes, then this vote passes 13–6–0 (68%) once changes are made as described in my own vote: until then, it fails 11–7–0 (61%) (omitting Ruakh's vote also, since it was conditional). If we say 60% passes, then this vote passes 11–7–0 (61%) now. —msh210℠ (talk) 06:34, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't think Ruakh's vote was expressly conditional like yours, or if it was, he expressed himself rather unclearly. Unless he says something that clarifies his position, I think it would be incorrect to count him as anything but a support vote. (You, however, made your position extremely clear, so counting you as conditional makes perfect sense.) —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 15:58, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Correct — my vote was not conditional. I unconditionally support enabling Tabbed Languages by default; however, I believe that the process of enabling Tabbed Languages is more complex than just adding default into the gadget-definitions code, because it also involves things like (1) some mechanism for pointing links at the right language section, and (2) a bot-run to move lede content into language sections (or some sort of JavaScript change with that effect), and (3) etc. —Ruakh TALK 03:47, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't think we should really consider such conditional votes. The purpose of a vote is to clarify and codify consensus; if we introduce conditions then support no longer means support, and we get situations like this. It makes the vote lose much of its value. 16:02, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
 * If a vote is going to be binary — yes or no with no options for "yes after fixes" or the like — then you're going to get conditional votes (sometimes). A conditional vote then may be the sign of either a badly sculpted vote or one that's not yet ripe. —msh210℠ (talk) 14:43, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
 * By my lights, a result strictly above 2/3 on a non-constitutional matter should be a pass, unless some unspecified extraordinary condititions ensue. --Dan Polansky (talk) 21:09, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I think we could create a meta-vote like this: "For some votes, the result that strictly surpasses 2/3 is a pass". This would not clarify for which votes, but it would clarify that the threshold is as low as 2/3 under some circumstances. --Dan Polansky (talk) 21:11, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
 * As far as I know, there has never been a consensus on what constitutes a pass and a non-pass, it's just down to whoever closes the vote. Mglovesfun (talk) 15:36, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
 * That's my impression as well, though I doubt anyone would get away with calling 23% support a pass.—msh210℠ on a public computer 03:24, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I've heard that, but personally I feel that 2/3 should be sufficient. Anyway, msh voted for the proposal, so I trust him to call it defeated. I've also added a late vote, thinking to mention that extending the voting period may have been considered a better approach. DAVilla 05:47, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
 * There's also the issue of the two users who voted in the BP pre-vote poll (one of which while this vote was running) but didn't vote here. I still don't know whether it would be considered canvassing to notify them of this discussion... --Yair rand (talk) 05:53, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Not IMO. I've mentioned then-ongoing votes to people who had expressed interest in the issue, being careful to mention it to both those who had supported and those who had opposed. —msh210℠ (talk) 14:43, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Re: "..., there has never been a consensus on what constitutes a pass and a non-pass": There has never been a consensus about an exact threshold, but there has been consensus about approximate range, discernible from countless votes that passed or were closed as "no consensus" without there being a loud opposition to their closing. In its detail, this closing is not based on previous practice but rather may be used in further votes as evidence of thresholds actually being used. This is why I record here my opposition to using a threshold higher than 2/3 for this vote. -Dan Polansky (talk) 20:56, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

To legalize DAVilla's vote and allow Yair rand to get more interested editors to cast a vote, I have unilaterally extended this vote by about a week from today. If anyone disagrees with this extension, it can be reverted, but take care to strike DAVilla's vote as well. If this extension is accepted, I conclude that the vote is not yet closed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 21:09, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I support the extension. --Dan Polansky (talk) 20:56, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Me, too. —msh210℠ (talk) 09:10, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Looks like it passes, 16-6-1. There are still a lot of things that need to be done before it's deployed, including: Since the eventual default-on version is going to be the gadget, I'm going to consider both the PREFS version and the "button version" to be obsolete-ish, to be removed after deployment of the gadget version, so those might become buggy. --Yair rand (talk) 01:49, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
 * We probably still have lots of uncategorized language sections that need to be dealt with. Ruakh, do you think you could generate User:Yair rand/uncategorized language sections/English and User:Yair rand/uncategorized language sections/Not English again?
 * Lede content needs to be moved into language sections. This would probably be best done by bot.
 * Links need to direct to language sections. This can be done either by javascript or by templates, not sure which would be better.
 * TL delay needs to be improved. There's probably not much we can do about this before a fix for bug 27488 is available, and I have no idea when that will be.
 * The script needs lots of testing to check for bugs. I think that when we eventually deploy, we should do it in stages, first just admins, then logged-in users, then everyone, so that we find as many bugs as possible before it reaches most readers.
 * We'll need code for an enable/disable button, to be added to Common.js. (I filed a bug 42687 asking for documentation on the API's action=options, so that I'll hopefully be able to have the disable button work on a per-user basis for logged in users, and not just per-computer.)
 * Apparently it's just action=options&optionname=gadget-TabbedLanguages&optionvalue=#&token=XXXXXX+\\, with optionvalue=0 to turn off and optionvalue=1 to turn on. Enabling and disabling per account is fully possible. --Yair rand (talk) 20:36, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * (List is incomplete (probably). Feel free to add other deployment-blocking issues.)
 * We had an all-admin test some time ago, actually. So we can skip that. Adding links to language sections would be better suited to templates, considering we already have the infrastructure in place. A JavaScript-only approach would not work here, because the JS can't know which language a link should point to, unless something on the page told it, in which case you've already arrived at the templated solution very quickly. 02:04, 5 December 2012 (UTC)