text:
Talk:well put

well put
Fairly obvious SoP, despite the polysemousness of put. Compare nicely put, neatly put, put very well, and well stated. Equinox ◑ 22:35, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. DCDuring TALK 00:37, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Well said, delete. Mglovesfun (talk) 09:27, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
 * I agree on the deletion --Diuturno (talk) 18:40, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

 * Deleted. - -sche (discuss) 09:39, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:well put


text: Category:vi:Primates

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Category:vi:Primates


text:
Talk:yo no hablo ucraniano

yo no hablo ucraniano
Red-linked Spanish phrasebook entry. --ElisaVan (talk) 10:35, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. A Spanish entry that means I don't speak Ukrainian. One of the latest discussions (January 2013) on the "I don't speak ..." entries is at Talk:I_don't_speak; it showed 7 for deletion (Dan Polansky, bd2412, Mglovesfun, SemperBlotto, Ungoliant, Pass a Method, Anatoli) and 2 for keeping (CodeCat, Yair rand ). --Dan Polansky (talk) 17:36, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

 * Deleted. - -sche (discuss) 09:08, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:yo no hablo ucraniano


text:
Talk:yo no hablo turco

yo no hablo turco
Red-linked Spanish phrasebook entry. --ElisaVan (talk) 10:35, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. A Spanish entry that means I don't speak Turkish. One of the latest discussions (January 2013) on the "I don't speak ..." entries is at Talk:I_don't_speak; it showed 7 for deletion (Dan Polansky, bd2412, Mglovesfun, SemperBlotto, Ungoliant, Pass a Method, Anatoli) and 2 for keeping (CodeCat, Yair rand ). --Dan Polansky (talk) 17:38, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

 * Deleted. - -sche (discuss) 09:08, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:yo no hablo turco


text:
Talk:yo necesito un lápiz

yo necesito un lápiz
Red-linked Spanish phrasebook entry. --ElisaVan (talk) 10:35, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
 * This, and the two previous ones used to be blue-linked when they were created. As the English phrases have been deleted, let's delete this too. But why do we still have I don't speak Indonesian and I don't speak Persian? We also have ես թուրքերեն չեմ խոսում and je ne parle pas turc, which both mean "I don't speak Turkish", and should consequently be deleted. Same verdict applies to eu não falo ucraniano and Ukraynaca bilmiyorum, which mean "I don't speak Ukrainian". I suspect there are many more out there. --Hekaheka (talk) 16:44, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Shouldn't all of these drop the "yo"? I'm not fluent, but I would translate them with something like "I, on the other hand, speak...". Chuck Entz (talk) 19:32, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

 * Deleted. - -sche (discuss) 09:08, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:yo necesito un lápiz


text:
Talk:sabeth

sabeth
Hi all, could an admin please delete this page as the correct word in northern sami is sabet (plural sabehat). I did the move. (Moreover, "th" is impossible in northern sami). Thanks a lot. Unsui (talk) 16:41, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
 * For future reference, if you want something to be speedily deleted (if it does not require discussion), then just add the template to it and an admin will find it and delete it. --WikiTiki89 16:47, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
 * I notice that you did add the template. You do not have to bring it up on this page unless it needs discussion. --WikiTiki89 16:49, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
 * OK, thanks for the advices. Unsui (talk) 09:44, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

title: Talk:sabeth


text:
Talk:ΛΣΔ-25

ΛΣΔ-25
Non-existent abbreviation for LSD. Correct page already exists: διαιθυλαμίδιο του λυσεργικού οξέος. As you can see, if there were a Greek abbreviation, which there isn't, the initials would have been ΔΛΟ not ΛΣΔ. Jenniepet (talk) 18:05, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Move to RFV. That in itself is not an argument as abbreviations themselves can be borrowed from other languages. If you doubt its existence, you should nominate it for WT:RFV rather than here. This page is where we debate whether to include terms that do exist. --WikiTiki89 18:14, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
 * In Greek, when we borrow abbreviations, we keep the Latin script, e.g. LSD. We don't transliterate the abbreviation. A transliterated abbreviation looks frankly ridiculous to me. Anyway, I guess it's your call. Should I nominate it for WT:RFV now? Jenniepet (talk) 04:10, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, RFV is the place to dispute the existence of a term or definition. --WikiTiki89 13:43, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
 * This is a Tbot entry (that is, not created by a human editor) but since I seem some Greek editors in its history I think we should RFV instead of speedy deleting. Mglovesfun (talk) 17:14, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

ΛΣΔ-25
Non-existent abbreviation for LSD. Correct page already exists: διαιθυλαμίδιο του λυσεργικού οξέος. The Greek abbreviation for this would have been ΔΛΟ not ΛΣΔ. ΛΣΔ is a transliteration of the initials in LSD and transliteration of abbreviations is never done in Greek. No results in Google books either. Jenniepet (talk) 19:20, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Can this be deleted now?Jenniepet (talk) 10:03, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes. Deleted. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 10:52, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:ΛΣΔ-25


text:
Talk:узел крепления главного лонжерона

узел крепления главного лонжерона
Can't attest. . Even finds almost nothing, but maybe it should be searched for inflected forms? --Dan Polansky (talk) 20:57, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

 * In some environment it may be considered an important piece of equipment but I don't see it as an important dictionary item or an idiomatic expression. It seems a pure sum of parts to me. Delete. --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 02:22, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

 * I've already nominated this quite a while ago at WT:RFD. There's no point RFVing it if it will be deleted soon anyway. (All it needs is some votes, as no one has weighed in yet.) --WikiTiki89 02:31, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
 * If you refresh yourself about our processes, you will realize that boldfaced keeps in RFV are rare, since RFVs are largely based on provided evidence or its lack. See also Requests for verification/Header.
 * If a term appears unattested and at the same time sum of parts, RFV seems to be a better venue than RFD, since lack of attestation is easier to check than being sum of parts, easier especially for those who do not speak Russian. --Dan Polansky (talk) 14:55, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm not talking about the likelihood; it will be deleting either way. I'm talking about the fact that the RFD has already been there for two weeks and so it will be sooner before it is deleted. --WikiTiki89 15:06, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm not talking about the likelihood; it will be deleting either way. I'm talking about the fact that the RFD has already been there for two weeks and so it will be sooner before it is deleted. --WikiTiki89 15:06, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

I think the best way to handle such word combinations is a usex. --Vahag (talk) 12:30, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Why would you add a word sequence that no one uses as an usex? --Dan Polansky (talk) 13:54, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Usexes don't have to be attested. The word sequence is the correct translation of English "main spar attachment point" and that's sufficient. What do you have against this sequence? "узел крепления лонжерона", without главного, is given as the translation of German Holmanschluß in a serious print dictionary, Немецко-русский политехнический словарь. © «РУССО», 2004, Бардышев Г.М. и др. 110 тыс. статей. and of Holmbeschlag in Немецко-русский авиационный словарь (Москва, Военное издательство Министерства обороны, 1964, 630 с.), Сост.: Горский В.В., Дремичев И.Д., Столбов В.С. It is also given as the translation of English "spar attachment" and "longeron fitting" in two electronic dictionaries, possibly based on print dictionaries. --Vahag (talk) 14:14, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The English term seems unattested: . While sentences used as usage examples can be unattested, a short phrase's being unattested suggests the phrase is not used. As for "узел крепления лонжерона", finds almost nothing, as does ; a print dictionary can be wrong, and we do not include English dictionary-only terms in the mainspace. Anyway, I suspect no one says or writes "узел крепления главного лонжерона", so it should ideally not appear in English Wiktionary at all. --Dan Polansky (talk) 14:26, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

 * We don't know if узел крепления главного лонжерона is used or not. Only a fraction of Russian technical literature is available on the Internet and searchable. --Vahag (talk) 14:40, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

 * Deleted: RFD-failed. - -sche (discuss) 09:24, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

узел крепления главного лонжерона
SOP in both Russian and English. The definition given is a word-for-word translation. --WikiTiki89 23:05, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. My reasoning is at WT:RFV. --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 02:45, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

 * Deleted. - -sche (discuss) 09:23, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:узел крепления главного лонжерона


text:
Talk:if anything should happen

if anything should happen
"In case of emergency." Just like if anything happens:, if something should happen:, if there's any issue: etc etc. Ƿidsiþ 15:21, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Indeed. Mglovesfun (talk) 11:43, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

 * Strong delete. Equinox ◑ 14:12, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
 * What they said. —msh210℠ (talk) 06:03, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Deleted. bd2412 T 16:53, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:if anything should happen


text:
Reconstruction talk:Proto-Slavic/-ica

I think here is mistake — zlatica. I think zoltъ + ica should be zoltica.

title: Reconstruction talk:Proto-Slavic/-ica


text:
Talk:Obelix

Obelix
"One of the protagonists of the comic-book series Asterix." Hardly a dictionary definition to begin with. Equinox ◑ 17:10, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. I would have speedied this. --WikiTiki89 17:13, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Deleted. — T AKASUGI Shinji (talk) 10:56, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete, but in process. DCDuring TALK 18:00, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. bd2412 T 02:16, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. Doesn't this word belong to the English vocabulary? I would have assumed that it's famous enough. And its etymology is interesting: I'm not sure (it may be coincidental) but I assume that it originates from obelisk (= dagger), a sign used the same way as the asterisk (*). Lmaltier (talk) 07:48, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
 * There are thousands of TV cartoons and comic books that have characters with funny names. I don't believe they have a definition (meaning) other than "name of a person", so they don't fit here. Equinox ◑ 07:50, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. - -sche (discuss) 08:25, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep, since no CFI-relating reason for deletion was stated, and this single-word entry is useful at least for pronunciation. Asterix is a related entry whose translation table contains what to me appears to be lexicographical information. --Dan Polansky (talk) 18:43, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
 * How about 'not idiomatic'? Mglovesfun (talk) 20:23, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
 * WT:CFI: "An expression is “idiomatic” if its full meaning cannot be easily derived from the meaning of its separate components." "Obelix" has no separate components, and thus its meaning (the character it refers to) cannot be derived from the meaning of separate components. You and I have been over this before a couple of times over the last several years, right? --Dan Polansky (talk) 07:29, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. No idiomatic usage claimed. Fame doesn't count.--Dmol (talk) 20:42, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Dan Polansky votes keep on the basis that no CFI reason for deletion is given. There are several: Conveying meaning, Name of specific entity, and name of a character in a fictional universe. Spinning Spark  00:22, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Re: "Conveying meaning": If "Obelix" fails to convey meanings, so does "London" or "Casiopeia"; it seems you are denying meaning to proper nouns and ignoring the fact that both CFI and common practice support a broad inclusion of proper names in Wiktionary. "Name of specific entity" is not a reason for deletion; see WT:CFI. As for "name of a character in a fictional universe", that could be a reason, in relation to WT:CFI, but that is not stated in the nomination, probably since it would lead to RFV rather than RFD nomination. --Dan Polansky (talk) 07:29, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. There are dozens upon dozens of proper nouns in Tolkien's legendarium that are as rich or even richer in lexical details (not just conlang details- dwarves and wizards and men are given names from attested Germanic languages), but we don't include them. However much you may like the series, and however much you may appreciate their creator's respect for ancient European history, we're still talking about the name of a specific individual in a fictional universe, used only to identify that individual- so it doubly fails CFI. Chuck Entz (talk) 02:11, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
 * How would you know that it fails CFI without RFV? The other thing is that CFI is bad, since it excludes lexicographical material without providing a plausible rationale for how that is a good thing. I do not understand why we would want to include names of obscure villages while excluding e.g. Shellob, Ungoliant and Sauron, complete with pronunciation. --Dan Polansky (talk) 15:01, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per Spinningspark. Mglovesfun (talk) 12:45, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Obélix
There seems to be consensus that Obelix should be deleted. I can't see any reason why the French and Spanish Obélixes should be treated different from the English Obelix. - -sche (discuss) 00:18, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Deleted. — T AKASUGI Shinji (talk) 10:56, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:Obelix


text:
Talk:Obélix

Obelix
"One of the protagonists of the comic-book series Asterix." Hardly a dictionary definition to begin with. Equinox ◑ 17:10, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. I would have speedied this. --WikiTiki89 17:13, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Deleted. — T AKASUGI Shinji (talk) 10:56, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete, but in process. DCDuring TALK 18:00, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. bd2412 T 02:16, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. Doesn't this word belong to the English vocabulary? I would have assumed that it's famous enough. And its etymology is interesting: I'm not sure (it may be coincidental) but I assume that it originates from obelisk (= dagger), a sign used the same way as the asterisk (*). Lmaltier (talk) 07:48, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
 * There are thousands of TV cartoons and comic books that have characters with funny names. I don't believe they have a definition (meaning) other than "name of a person", so they don't fit here. Equinox ◑ 07:50, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. - -sche (discuss) 08:25, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep, since no CFI-relating reason for deletion was stated, and this single-word entry is useful at least for pronunciation. Asterix is a related entry whose translation table contains what to me appears to be lexicographical information. --Dan Polansky (talk) 18:43, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
 * How about 'not idiomatic'? Mglovesfun (talk) 20:23, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
 * WT:CFI: "An expression is “idiomatic” if its full meaning cannot be easily derived from the meaning of its separate components." "Obelix" has no separate components, and thus its meaning (the character it refers to) cannot be derived from the meaning of separate components. You and I have been over this before a couple of times over the last several years, right? --Dan Polansky (talk) 07:29, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. No idiomatic usage claimed. Fame doesn't count.--Dmol (talk) 20:42, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Dan Polansky votes keep on the basis that no CFI reason for deletion is given. There are several: Conveying meaning, Name of specific entity, and name of a character in a fictional universe. Spinning Spark  00:22, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Re: "Conveying meaning": If "Obelix" fails to convey meanings, so does "London" or "Casiopeia"; it seems you are denying meaning to proper nouns and ignoring the fact that both CFI and common practice support a broad inclusion of proper names in Wiktionary. "Name of specific entity" is not a reason for deletion; see WT:CFI. As for "name of a character in a fictional universe", that could be a reason, in relation to WT:CFI, but that is not stated in the nomination, probably since it would lead to RFV rather than RFD nomination. --Dan Polansky (talk) 07:29, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. There are dozens upon dozens of proper nouns in Tolkien's legendarium that are as rich or even richer in lexical details (not just conlang details- dwarves and wizards and men are given names from attested Germanic languages), but we don't include them. However much you may like the series, and however much you may appreciate their creator's respect for ancient European history, we're still talking about the name of a specific individual in a fictional universe, used only to identify that individual- so it doubly fails CFI. Chuck Entz (talk) 02:11, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
 * How would you know that it fails CFI without RFV? The other thing is that CFI is bad, since it excludes lexicographical material without providing a plausible rationale for how that is a good thing. I do not understand why we would want to include names of obscure villages while excluding e.g. Shellob, Ungoliant and Sauron, complete with pronunciation. --Dan Polansky (talk) 15:01, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per Spinningspark. Mglovesfun (talk) 12:45, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Obélix
There seems to be consensus that Obelix should be deleted. I can't see any reason why the French and Spanish Obélixes should be treated different from the English Obelix. - -sche (discuss) 00:18, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Deleted. — T AKASUGI Shinji (talk) 10:56, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:Obélix


text:
Talk:Occupied Kashmir

Occupied Kashmir
SOP: [[occupied]] [[Kashmir]]. As demonstrated by the citations I just added, the Indians use it to refer to the parts occupied by Pakistan, the Pakistanis use it to refer to the parts occupied by India. Compare Occupied Ireland, the Occupied Golan Heights, Occupied Tibet, Occupied Palestine, Occupied Israel, Occupied Germany, Occupied Japan , Occupied Gibraltar ... - -sche (discuss) 02:55, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete as SOP. All entries from this user (currently blocked) need to be checked. Widespread POV violations and many others are SOP. I'll try and go through some later.--Dmol (talk) 00:40, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Good luck! I did my best to keep up with them back in August, but eventually got tired of it. The main problem is that they're going into great detail about things that nobody outside the region really knows or cares about- it takes a lot of research to spot where they're taking liberties, and even more to figure out the best NPOV alternative to their version. Chuck Entz (talk) 01:55, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I was going to say add the sense to occupied but it's already there. Delete. Mglovesfun (talk) 18:59, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Deleted. — T AKASUGI Shinji (talk) 04:06, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is a political status, not an etymological status. bd2412 T 15:38, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:Occupied Kashmir


text:
Talk:unspoken rule

unspoken rule
Completely covered by +. --Hekaheka (talk) 00:51, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

unwritten rule

 * Ditto.

 * Keep both; an unspoken rule remains an unspoken rule even if it is "spoken", and the same goes for an unwritten rule. For example:
 * 2002, Susan Barksdale, Teri Lund, Rapid Strategic Planning, page 22:
 * The employees are well compensated and it is an unspoken rule that leaving early is not acceptable, and most employees are at their desks at least an hour before they are scheduled to begin the day's work.
 * Obviously, what is described here as an "unspoken" rule had to have been conveyed to the author at some point, probably by someone speaking the rule. bd2412 T 02:04, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * That isn't obvious at all. Reading this, I would assume the author deduced the rule from observation rather than because someone told her about it directly. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 07:53, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Even so, this author has now written it down. Is it still an unspoken/unwritten rule, once it has been spoken/written? I think it is, and therefore exceeds the literal meaning of the phrase. bd2412 T 13:13, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * What's the relationship between this and gentleman's agreement? It seems more like they are constructed as synonyms of gentleman's agreement rather than constructed as unspoken + rule. If it can be demonstrated that they are close to synonymous, we can perhaps preserve it as an redirect to gentleman's agreement. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 03:40, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Am I missing something? Is there something in the definition of "unspoken rule" that the definition #2 of "unspoken" does not cover? --Hekaheka (talk) 07:24, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * A gentleman's agreement is not the same thing at all. A gentleman's agreement is freely entered into; an unspoken rule may have an element of coercion, it at least does not imply willing compliance.  A gentleman's agreement is a contract (albeit a legally unenforceable one) where both parties derive some benefit; for an unwritten rule the benefit is entirely one way - from the rule subject to the rule maker.  A gentleman's agreement is not necessarily unwritten and it is certainly never unspoken.  Spinning Spark  09:29, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * It's closer to the idea of a (societal) norm, used within smallish groups (a village, a workplace, a family, or even between two people). Breaking one might be a faux pas, and may lead to sanctions like the silent treatment or ostracism (consider that people may not want to explain what you did wrong). — Pingkudimmi 11:49, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

 * I don't think they should be treated as synonyms. An unspoken rule is something accepted tacitly, whereas an unwritten rule may be mentioned, but not recorded in writing. Not quite the same. Donnanz (talk) 10:05, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Weak keep unspoken rule, not sure about unwritten rule. DAVilla 12:46, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

 * Delete both and add proper senses to unwritten and unspoken . Many things can be unwritten or unspoken such as __ secret, __ convention, __ lie, __ tension, etc., all of which apply even if these things are written or spoken. --WikiTiki89 14:29, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Apparently these senses are already there, so the terms are 100% SOP. --WikiTiki89 14:31, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete both. Neither unspoken rule nor unwritten rule are synonymous with gentleman's agreement in my experience. An unwritten or unspoken rule is one that is unwritten or unspoken at the time it is effective between the parties. The actions of observers and the subsequent actions of the participants are completely irrelevant. DCDuring TALK 14:47, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

 * I would keep them, but the definitions need revising; they are rather nonsensical. Donnanz (talk) 17:04, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep both at least as a translation target. Matthias Buchmeier (talk) 20:10, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

 * Keep both. Idiomatic. If an unwritten or unspoken rule is written or spoken that doesn't suddenly change their meaning. The definition needs refining though, since they are not really rules per se but conventions or norms. ---> Tooironic (talk) 02:29, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 * But this is a property of the words and . Not everything unwritten or unspoken is actually never written or never spoken. We have senses at both terms that cover the meaning of  and.

Kept. — T AKASUGI Shinji (talk) 04:06, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep both. --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 10:49, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:unspoken rule


text:
Talk:unwritten rule

unspoken rule
Completely covered by +. --Hekaheka (talk) 00:51, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

unwritten rule

 * Ditto.

 * Keep both; an unspoken rule remains an unspoken rule even if it is "spoken", and the same goes for an unwritten rule. For example:
 * 2002, Susan Barksdale, Teri Lund, Rapid Strategic Planning, page 22:
 * The employees are well compensated and it is an unspoken rule that leaving early is not acceptable, and most employees are at their desks at least an hour before they are scheduled to begin the day's work.
 * Obviously, what is described here as an "unspoken" rule had to have been conveyed to the author at some point, probably by someone speaking the rule. bd2412 T 02:04, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * That isn't obvious at all. Reading this, I would assume the author deduced the rule from observation rather than because someone told her about it directly. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 07:53, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Even so, this author has now written it down. Is it still an unspoken/unwritten rule, once it has been spoken/written? I think it is, and therefore exceeds the literal meaning of the phrase. bd2412 T 13:13, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * What's the relationship between this and gentleman's agreement? It seems more like they are constructed as synonyms of gentleman's agreement rather than constructed as unspoken + rule. If it can be demonstrated that they are close to synonymous, we can perhaps preserve it as an redirect to gentleman's agreement. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 03:40, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Am I missing something? Is there something in the definition of "unspoken rule" that the definition #2 of "unspoken" does not cover? --Hekaheka (talk) 07:24, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * A gentleman's agreement is not the same thing at all. A gentleman's agreement is freely entered into; an unspoken rule may have an element of coercion, it at least does not imply willing compliance.  A gentleman's agreement is a contract (albeit a legally unenforceable one) where both parties derive some benefit; for an unwritten rule the benefit is entirely one way - from the rule subject to the rule maker.  A gentleman's agreement is not necessarily unwritten and it is certainly never unspoken.  Spinning Spark  09:29, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * It's closer to the idea of a (societal) norm, used within smallish groups (a village, a workplace, a family, or even between two people). Breaking one might be a faux pas, and may lead to sanctions like the silent treatment or ostracism (consider that people may not want to explain what you did wrong). — Pingkudimmi 11:49, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

 * I don't think they should be treated as synonyms. An unspoken rule is something accepted tacitly, whereas an unwritten rule may be mentioned, but not recorded in writing. Not quite the same. Donnanz (talk) 10:05, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Weak keep unspoken rule, not sure about unwritten rule. DAVilla 12:46, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

 * Delete both and add proper senses to unwritten and unspoken . Many things can be unwritten or unspoken such as __ secret, __ convention, __ lie, __ tension, etc., all of which apply even if these things are written or spoken. --WikiTiki89 14:29, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Apparently these senses are already there, so the terms are 100% SOP. --WikiTiki89 14:31, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete both. Neither unspoken rule nor unwritten rule are synonymous with gentleman's agreement in my experience. An unwritten or unspoken rule is one that is unwritten or unspoken at the time it is effective between the parties. The actions of observers and the subsequent actions of the participants are completely irrelevant. DCDuring TALK 14:47, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

 * I would keep them, but the definitions need revising; they are rather nonsensical. Donnanz (talk) 17:04, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep both at least as a translation target. Matthias Buchmeier (talk) 20:10, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

 * Keep both. Idiomatic. If an unwritten or unspoken rule is written or spoken that doesn't suddenly change their meaning. The definition needs refining though, since they are not really rules per se but conventions or norms. ---> Tooironic (talk) 02:29, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 * But this is a property of the words and . Not everything unwritten or unspoken is actually never written or never spoken. We have senses at both terms that cover the meaning of  and.

Kept. — T AKASUGI Shinji (talk) 04:06, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep both. --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 10:49, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:unwritten rule


text:
ἀδικέω

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to be in the wrong, to have sinned, to have broken the law
 * 2)  to do one wrong, to wrong one, to injure, to break the law
 * 1)  to do one wrong, to wrong one, to injure, to break the law
 * 1)  to do one wrong, to wrong one, to injure, to break the law
 * 1)  to do one wrong, to wrong one, to injure, to break the law
 * 1)  to do one wrong, to wrong one, to injure, to break the law
 * 1)  to do one wrong, to wrong one, to injure, to break the law
 * 1)  to do one wrong, to wrong one, to injure, to break the law
 * 1)  to do one wrong, to wrong one, to injure, to break the law
 * 1)  to do one wrong, to wrong one, to injure, to break the law
 * 1)  to do one wrong, to wrong one, to injure, to break the law
 * 1)  to do one wrong, to wrong one, to injure, to break the law
 * 1)  to do one wrong, to wrong one, to injure, to break the law
 * 1)  to do one wrong, to wrong one, to injure, to break the law
 * 1)  to do one wrong, to wrong one, to injure, to break the law
 * 1)  to do one wrong, to wrong one, to injure, to break the law

title: ἀδικέω


text:
Talk:enthousiastically

enthousiastically
According to Google's ngram feature, this spelling is less than 1/6000th as common as "enthusiastically" — not a "common misspelling", IMO. It's also defined as an adverb but with a POS header that says "adjective"... - -sche (discuss) 23:12, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete SemperBlotto (talk) 08:04, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete DCDuring TALK 14:01, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep, since the ratio of 6000 still seems okay for a common misspelling. I have checked User_talk:Dan_Polansky/2013 to see what sort of frequency ratios there are for misspellings. Don't forget that Ngram shows you copyedited misspellings. Here is for instance with the factor 3200. --Dan Polansky (talk) 21:56, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete as per my comment below. Donnanz (talk) 18:31, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Deleted. - -sche (discuss) 09:26, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

enthousiastic
As above. This spelling is about 1/4000th as common as "enthusiastic", not a common misspelling, IMO. - -sche (discuss) 08:30, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete DCDuring TALK 14:01, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete both (they don't even seem citable as obsolete spellings). Ƿidsiþ 14:22, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. --Dan Polansky (talk) 21:56, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Misspellings shouldn't be perpetuated. I have never come across it anyway. Donnanz (talk) 18:30, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * We are not perpetuating misspelings, since we are marking them as misspellings, directing the reader to a standard spelling. Do you suggest that Category:English misspellings should be deleted? --Dan Polansky (talk) 18:45, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I've thought about it and I have come up with what I think are reasonable criteria. A misspelling can be considered attested if it has three attestations where it occurs multiple times within the same work and is the only spelling used within that work. Otherwise, it is a typo and should not be included. --WikiTiki89 18:49, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't think this is a reasonable criterion of a misspelling, since I don't make the distinction that you suggest between typos and misspellings, and I find it unreasonable to require of a common misspelling that it is systematically there in a single work; your proposal seems to be an ad hoc invention not based on any empirical research. A misspelling can IMHO be recognized by its frequency ratio to the frequency of the mainstream spelling, as I have argued at User_talk:Dan_Polansky/2013. A misspelling is common if its frequncy ratio is quite high, say 1:10000 or better in a copyedited corpus. --Dan Polansky (talk) 19:06, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Recording of misspellings should be limited to common ones. I don't regard this pair as common misspellings. Donnanz (talk) 19:10, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * A typo is a random misspelling that occurs by accident without the knowledge of the typer/typesetter. I don't think we should include such misspellings. On the other hand, misspellings that arise due to incorrect knowledge or confusion with another word (i.e. if the typer/typesetter spells it the way he intended, but what he intended was incorrect) are much more useful to record in a dictionary. --WikiTiki89 19:22, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I know what a typo is, I make them myself. Does Wiktionary record common typos as well? I think this pair would be more common as typos rather than misspellings. Misspellings are due to someone not knowing the correct spelling, in other words they are spelt that way intentionally. Donnanz (talk) 19:36, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * That was aimed at Dan Polansky. But I'm glad we agree about the different between typos and intentional misspellings. --WikiTiki89 19:43, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * @Donnanz: Re: "Misspellings are due to someone not knowing the correct spelling, in other words they are spelt that way intentionally.": I don't think this is the customary meaning of the word "misspelling". does not suggests that misspellings are per definition intentional. "Common misspellings" are not necessarily intentional. We include them since people are more likely to search for them, and we want to explicitly say "this is a misspelling" rather than staying quiet about it by having no entry; at the same time, we direct them to the correct spelling, so they can find the actual definition rather than staring at a blank page. --Dan Polansky (talk) 12:58, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Deleted. - -sche (discuss) 09:26, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:enthousiastically


text:
Talk:enthousiastic

enthousiastically
According to Google's ngram feature, this spelling is less than 1/6000th as common as "enthusiastically" — not a "common misspelling", IMO. It's also defined as an adverb but with a POS header that says "adjective"... - -sche (discuss) 23:12, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete SemperBlotto (talk) 08:04, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete DCDuring TALK 14:01, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep, since the ratio of 6000 still seems okay for a common misspelling. I have checked User_talk:Dan_Polansky/2013 to see what sort of frequency ratios there are for misspellings. Don't forget that Ngram shows you copyedited misspellings. Here is for instance with the factor 3200. --Dan Polansky (talk) 21:56, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete as per my comment below. Donnanz (talk) 18:31, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Deleted. - -sche (discuss) 09:26, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

enthousiastic
As above. This spelling is about 1/4000th as common as "enthusiastic", not a common misspelling, IMO. - -sche (discuss) 08:30, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete DCDuring TALK 14:01, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete both (they don't even seem citable as obsolete spellings). Ƿidsiþ 14:22, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. --Dan Polansky (talk) 21:56, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Misspellings shouldn't be perpetuated. I have never come across it anyway. Donnanz (talk) 18:30, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * We are not perpetuating misspelings, since we are marking them as misspellings, directing the reader to a standard spelling. Do you suggest that Category:English misspellings should be deleted? --Dan Polansky (talk) 18:45, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I've thought about it and I have come up with what I think are reasonable criteria. A misspelling can be considered attested if it has three attestations where it occurs multiple times within the same work and is the only spelling used within that work. Otherwise, it is a typo and should not be included. --WikiTiki89 18:49, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't think this is a reasonable criterion of a misspelling, since I don't make the distinction that you suggest between typos and misspellings, and I find it unreasonable to require of a common misspelling that it is systematically there in a single work; your proposal seems to be an ad hoc invention not based on any empirical research. A misspelling can IMHO be recognized by its frequency ratio to the frequency of the mainstream spelling, as I have argued at User_talk:Dan_Polansky/2013. A misspelling is common if its frequncy ratio is quite high, say 1:10000 or better in a copyedited corpus. --Dan Polansky (talk) 19:06, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Recording of misspellings should be limited to common ones. I don't regard this pair as common misspellings. Donnanz (talk) 19:10, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * A typo is a random misspelling that occurs by accident without the knowledge of the typer/typesetter. I don't think we should include such misspellings. On the other hand, misspellings that arise due to incorrect knowledge or confusion with another word (i.e. if the typer/typesetter spells it the way he intended, but what he intended was incorrect) are much more useful to record in a dictionary. --WikiTiki89 19:22, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I know what a typo is, I make them myself. Does Wiktionary record common typos as well? I think this pair would be more common as typos rather than misspellings. Misspellings are due to someone not knowing the correct spelling, in other words they are spelt that way intentionally. Donnanz (talk) 19:36, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * That was aimed at Dan Polansky. But I'm glad we agree about the different between typos and intentional misspellings. --WikiTiki89 19:43, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * @Donnanz: Re: "Misspellings are due to someone not knowing the correct spelling, in other words they are spelt that way intentionally.": I don't think this is the customary meaning of the word "misspelling". does not suggests that misspellings are per definition intentional. "Common misspellings" are not necessarily intentional. We include them since people are more likely to search for them, and we want to explicitly say "this is a misspelling" rather than staying quiet about it by having no entry; at the same time, we direct them to the correct spelling, so they can find the actual definition rather than staring at a blank page. --Dan Polansky (talk) 12:58, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Deleted. - -sche (discuss) 09:26, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:enthousiastic


text:
Talk:shift key

shift key
as per Esc key -- Liliana • 09:20, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
 * There's an appendix here if anyone wants to check out the rest of the terminology. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 09:28, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep it. The meaning is not all that obvious. Oxford lists it under shift (also shift key). Donnanz (talk) 18:51, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * If we have a typing definition of shift then shift key is redundant to shift + key. --WikiTiki89 18:58, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * What a ridiculous argument! Unbelievable. Donnanz (talk) 19:04, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * And what is exactly so ridiculous about it that your best rebuttal is no more than an insult? --WikiTiki89 19:17, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Maybe most people just happen to know what a shift key is, but is the term really obvious from the sum of its parts? I don't think so. Key has more than one meaning, so does shift. So my comment cannot be regarded as an insult. You have to think outside the box. Donnanz (talk) 19:49, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Actually it can. If you had said what you just said now the first time around then it wouldn't have been. Anyway, if we have the proper definition of shift then someone who wants to know what a "shift key" is, will look up "shift", find "to move the keys on a typewriter over in order to type capital letters" as one of the definitions (and the only one that would fit in context) and they would not even need to look up "key". --WikiTiki89 19:56, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * And what's the purpose of doing that? Surely we should make it easy for users rather than putting hurdles in their path. I can imagine someone muttering under their breath "Wiktionary doesn't even have an entry for shift key, disgusting!" Donnanz (talk) 20:09, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I can only imagine their surprise when they then go to look up B button, fried worms, and cranberry-apple juice and find that those aren't there either. --WikiTiki89 20:19, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Imagine their surprise when we don't have an entry on Esc key either. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 21:15, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Esc key is in under another name. Donnanz (talk) 21:38, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. When you're in the context of computers or typewriters, you will know what a key is (or you can look it up at [[key]]), and you will know that the "XYZ key" is the name of the key that says "XYZ" on it. If you want to know what the XYZ key does, that's not for a dictionary to know. --WikiTiki89 21:46, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * If I remember correctly, pressing the shift key on an ancient typewriter physically shifts the type in order to type upper case; each striker had two characters on it. When the shift key is released, the type is lined up for lower case again. This of course doesn't happen with present-day computers, but the key is still called a shift key. I think a historical note (etymology?) should be added to the entry explaining the origin of this term, as the modern generation doesn't even know this. Donnanz (talk) 22:00, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * That information should all be at [[shift]]. The fact that the key is still says "Shift" is due to computer manufacturers, not word usage. --WikiTiki89 22:03, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Nothing regarding typewriters under shift or Shift, only computers. Donnanz (talk) 22:21, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Well there should be. --WikiTiki89 22:40, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

 * Delete per nom and per WikiTiki. - -sche (discuss) 22:31, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Kept. — T AKASUGI Shinji (talk) 04:06, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 00:16, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. shift has far too many computer meanings for it to be clear which one the shift key effects. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 09:49, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. Both shift and key have multiple meanings. We can't assume that the context will always be present or will help to define it sufficiently.--Dmol (talk) 22:18, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. I don't really know but since AHD, Collins, Macmillan and MWO have this, let's do something more useful than figuring out why this should be kept. That is, DCDuring's "lemmings". . --Dan Polansky (talk) 12:51, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

escape key
Same as above. --WikiTiki89 21:46, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

 * Delete per Liliana and WikiTiki's comments in the preceding section . - -sche (discuss) 22:31, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Kept. — T AKASUGI Shinji (talk) 04:06, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. Listed by Oxford. Donnanz (talk) 23:05, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Considering the OED's definition is "a key on some computer keyboards which when pressed causes an escape character to be transmitted", it seems pretty SOP. --WikiTiki89 23:10, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Which Oxford Dictionary are you using? It doesn't say that in my hard copy, nor online. Donnanz (talk) 23:21, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The digital version of the second edition. --WikiTiki89 23:29, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * It differs from my 2005 edition of the Oxford Dictionary of English, which is exactly the same as the online edition. Donnanz (talk) 23:42, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't have access to the online edition. So if you could maybe quote it here, that would help. --WikiTiki89 23:47, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * That's rather strange, I thought anybody could access it: OK, here goes - "A key on a computer keyboard which either interrupts the current operation or converts subsequent characters to a control sequence." I didn't notice the online edition is slightly different "... or causes subsequent characters to be interpreted differently." So now we have three versions... Donnanz (talk) 00:03, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
 * You need a paid subscription to access the OED online. I hope you know that oxforddictionaries.com is not affiliated with the OED (oed.com). --WikiTiki89 00:13, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Hmm, why pay for a definition like that? Mind you, I could do with a new hard copy, mine is starting to fall to pieces. The dust jacket wore out ages ago. Donnanz (talk) 00:31, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 00:16, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep, not a clear SOP. This, that and the other (talk) 09:23, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep, escape has two computer-related verb senses and one computer-related noun sense, but only one of these three is what an escape key does. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 09:49, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Actually they all are. The "escape character" is the one produced by the escape key and it is used to change the function of the next character. Although nowadays, "escape character" can also be used to refer to any character that does this, for example the backslash is commonly used as an escape character. --WikiTiki89 21:51, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. Both escape and key have multiple meanings. We can't assume that the context will always be present or will help to define it sufficiently. --Dmol (talk) 22:10, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
 * These terms don't have any meaning without context. Without context "escape key" could easily refer to a key that unlocks an emergency escape door, in which case our definition would be wrong. --WikiTiki89 00:05, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:shift key


text:
Talk:escape key

shift key
as per Esc key -- Liliana • 09:20, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
 * There's an appendix here if anyone wants to check out the rest of the terminology. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 09:28, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep it. The meaning is not all that obvious. Oxford lists it under shift (also shift key). Donnanz (talk) 18:51, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * If we have a typing definition of shift then shift key is redundant to shift + key. --WikiTiki89 18:58, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * What a ridiculous argument! Unbelievable. Donnanz (talk) 19:04, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * And what is exactly so ridiculous about it that your best rebuttal is no more than an insult? --WikiTiki89 19:17, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Maybe most people just happen to know what a shift key is, but is the term really obvious from the sum of its parts? I don't think so. Key has more than one meaning, so does shift. So my comment cannot be regarded as an insult. You have to think outside the box. Donnanz (talk) 19:49, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Actually it can. If you had said what you just said now the first time around then it wouldn't have been. Anyway, if we have the proper definition of shift then someone who wants to know what a "shift key" is, will look up "shift", find "to move the keys on a typewriter over in order to type capital letters" as one of the definitions (and the only one that would fit in context) and they would not even need to look up "key". --WikiTiki89 19:56, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * And what's the purpose of doing that? Surely we should make it easy for users rather than putting hurdles in their path. I can imagine someone muttering under their breath "Wiktionary doesn't even have an entry for shift key, disgusting!" Donnanz (talk) 20:09, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I can only imagine their surprise when they then go to look up B button, fried worms, and cranberry-apple juice and find that those aren't there either. --WikiTiki89 20:19, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Imagine their surprise when we don't have an entry on Esc key either. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 21:15, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Esc key is in under another name. Donnanz (talk) 21:38, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. When you're in the context of computers or typewriters, you will know what a key is (or you can look it up at [[key]]), and you will know that the "XYZ key" is the name of the key that says "XYZ" on it. If you want to know what the XYZ key does, that's not for a dictionary to know. --WikiTiki89 21:46, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * If I remember correctly, pressing the shift key on an ancient typewriter physically shifts the type in order to type upper case; each striker had two characters on it. When the shift key is released, the type is lined up for lower case again. This of course doesn't happen with present-day computers, but the key is still called a shift key. I think a historical note (etymology?) should be added to the entry explaining the origin of this term, as the modern generation doesn't even know this. Donnanz (talk) 22:00, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * That information should all be at [[shift]]. The fact that the key is still says "Shift" is due to computer manufacturers, not word usage. --WikiTiki89 22:03, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Nothing regarding typewriters under shift or Shift, only computers. Donnanz (talk) 22:21, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Well there should be. --WikiTiki89 22:40, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

 * Delete per nom and per WikiTiki. - -sche (discuss) 22:31, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Kept. — T AKASUGI Shinji (talk) 04:06, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 00:16, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. shift has far too many computer meanings for it to be clear which one the shift key effects. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 09:49, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. Both shift and key have multiple meanings. We can't assume that the context will always be present or will help to define it sufficiently.--Dmol (talk) 22:18, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. I don't really know but since AHD, Collins, Macmillan and MWO have this, let's do something more useful than figuring out why this should be kept. That is, DCDuring's "lemmings". . --Dan Polansky (talk) 12:51, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

escape key
Same as above. --WikiTiki89 21:46, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

 * Delete per Liliana and WikiTiki's comments in the preceding section . - -sche (discuss) 22:31, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Kept. — T AKASUGI Shinji (talk) 04:06, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. Listed by Oxford. Donnanz (talk) 23:05, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Considering the OED's definition is "a key on some computer keyboards which when pressed causes an escape character to be transmitted", it seems pretty SOP. --WikiTiki89 23:10, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Which Oxford Dictionary are you using? It doesn't say that in my hard copy, nor online. Donnanz (talk) 23:21, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The digital version of the second edition. --WikiTiki89 23:29, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * It differs from my 2005 edition of the Oxford Dictionary of English, which is exactly the same as the online edition. Donnanz (talk) 23:42, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't have access to the online edition. So if you could maybe quote it here, that would help. --WikiTiki89 23:47, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * That's rather strange, I thought anybody could access it: OK, here goes - "A key on a computer keyboard which either interrupts the current operation or converts subsequent characters to a control sequence." I didn't notice the online edition is slightly different "... or causes subsequent characters to be interpreted differently." So now we have three versions... Donnanz (talk) 00:03, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
 * You need a paid subscription to access the OED online. I hope you know that oxforddictionaries.com is not affiliated with the OED (oed.com). --WikiTiki89 00:13, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Hmm, why pay for a definition like that? Mind you, I could do with a new hard copy, mine is starting to fall to pieces. The dust jacket wore out ages ago. Donnanz (talk) 00:31, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 00:16, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep, not a clear SOP. This, that and the other (talk) 09:23, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep, escape has two computer-related verb senses and one computer-related noun sense, but only one of these three is what an escape key does. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 09:49, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Actually they all are. The "escape character" is the one produced by the escape key and it is used to change the function of the next character. Although nowadays, "escape character" can also be used to refer to any character that does this, for example the backslash is commonly used as an escape character. --WikiTiki89 21:51, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. Both escape and key have multiple meanings. We can't assume that the context will always be present or will help to define it sufficiently. --Dmol (talk) 22:10, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
 * These terms don't have any meaning without context. Without context "escape key" could easily refer to a key that unlocks an emergency escape door, in which case our definition would be wrong. --WikiTiki89 00:05, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:escape key


text:
Talk:cod liver oil

cod liver oil
Really? --WikiTiki89 18:45, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, really. Keep. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 19:35, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. Ƿidsiþ 19:36, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

 * So anything that's put in a pill automatically becomes idiomatic? --WikiTiki89 20:31, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't know about anything that's put in a pill, but anything that's idiomatic enough for AHD, Collins, Merriam-Webster, and Oxford is idiomatic enough for Wiktionary. I notice, however, that most dictionaries prefer cod-liver oil with a hyphen. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 21:00, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I just looked it up in the OED and was impressed by how far back the quotes go (1783, 1846, 1870). But still, I think that it is an SOP phrase despite its relevance to medicine and nutrition. It has a Wikipedia article, which would satisfy the needs of anyone who needs information on it, but it's fairly obvious what the words mean, and so I don't think it needs to be in a dictionary. --WikiTiki89 21:14, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Why should that be the test of what goes in a dictionary? We're not writing it for our own benefit, we're writing it as a resource for people who might want to look something up. Maybe they need a translation of the phrase, for which the component parts alone are not helpful. Maybe they want to know the history of the phrase or how long it has been in use. Seriously, why are we writing a dictionary? bd2412 T 22:19, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Well, primarily to define words. Why should that be a test of what goes in a dictionary? Because WT:CFI says so. --WikiTiki89 22:34, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
 * "To define words" is just a restatement of what writing a dictionary is. Why do we want to define words? bd2412 T 22:46, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Do we still consider ourselves less authoritative than other dictionaries that we have to look to them to determine what we should or should not keep, when we're about the fifth website hit that comes up when Googling for a word (e.g. granule)? Have any other dictionaries ever invoked the argument "that dictionary has that term, so we should have it too"? This question is not limited to the particular term at hand, however. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 23:04, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
 * WikiTiki, it's not just the fact that it's in a pill, it's the fact that it means ‘a nutritional supplement’, or if you prefer, ‘the oil from a fish as used as a nutritional supplement’. Yes there may perhaps be fishermen somewhere that have once said ‘cod liver oil’ just because they have cut a fish open and there is some oil, but in normal language we all mean something rather more specific. Ƿidsiþ 07:42, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * But does it mean "a nutritional supplement" or does it just happen to be used as one? --WikiTiki89 16:11, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Keep. The term is expressed differently in other languages - as "liver oil" or "fish oil". The English term, AFAIK, can't be replaced with other combinations to get the same product. --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 22:10, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
 * But, for example, does Russian really refer exclusively to oil from the liver of a codfish? --WikiTiki89 22:15, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, it's the normal way to refer to "cod liver oil" in Russian, even if it simply means "fish oil fat" but predicting your possible next question, it can also mean oil/fat from other fishes and not from the liver, so unlike the case with the English term, people in Russia don't automatically know where "рыбий жир" comes from. --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 22:20, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Well, in English you can also say fish oil when referring to cod liver oil (after all, cod is a fish) and according to this Ngram, "fish oil" as a phrase is used more commonly than "cod liver oil". --WikiTiki89 22:34, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Right now, I don't know about the idiomaticity of the English "fish oil" but Russian "ры́бий жир" is considered idiomatic and included in dictionaries and is translated into English as "cod liver oil", not "fish oil". See cod liver oil and рыбий жир, note that there are three sources of the latter here 1) ABBYY Lingvo dictionary of the common vocabulary, 2) ABBYY Lingvo dictionary of medical terms and 3) ABBYY Lingvo dictionary of scientific/technical terms. --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 22:57, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I just checked several online Russian-Russian dictionaries. Firstly, very few of them even have, considering it obviously derived from + . Secondly, none of them have "рыбий жир" and the only one that mentions it (here) does so in a usage example of , implying that "рыбий жир" is nothing more than fat/oil derived from fish. --WikiTiki89 23:17, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Well, I cited a dictionary where it IS included. The fact that your example has "Добываемый из рыбы" (Obtainable from fish) only explains the sense of "рыбий". --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 23:27, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, but it's a bilingual dictionary. Monolingual dictionaries are a better test of idiomacity. And yes, "Добываемый из рыбы" only explaines "рыбий", because it was an entry for "рыбий"; "рыбий жир" was one of usage examples. --WikiTiki89 00:08, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

 * Also citable:, , , , . — Ungoliant (falai) 22:39, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

keep --Hekaheka (talk) 06:41, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Judging by, excluding this would give use an opportunity to distinguish ourselves from a host of less-discriminating lexicographers. DCDuring TALK 22:58, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I am not of a mind that we should distinguish ourselves by offering less, when we are able to offer more. We should distinguish ourselves by building a superior level of utility with citations to use, translations, pronunciations, and similar features (as well as breadth of coverage in many languages). bd2412 T 23:07, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I think DC was was employing some appropriate sarcasm. Ƿidsiþ 07:42, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Someone brought up the hyphenated version of this word. That might be considered idiomatic, and if it is also attestable but this version is more common it might pass WT:COALMINE. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 23:04, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
 * We haven't been allowing hyphenated forms in English because many non-idiomatic phrases can be linked to make something easier to decide in reading. (For example, I used nominator-challenger below.) I think that is a good stance. DCDuring TALK 16:41, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep without question. Donnanz (talk) 12:13, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - not obvious from its parts that it is a nutritional supplement. SemperBlotto (talk) 12:17, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

 * Kept --Back on the list (talk) 16:16, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * We usually give something a week on this page, unless the nominator-challenger withdraws the RfD. As a prediction "kept" seems like a very safe bet. DCDuring TALK 16:41, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep under the lemming principle, especially as the lemmings include even such dictionaries as Merriam Webster, not just medical glossaries and WordNet. DCDuring TALK 16:41, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

In, you added etymology and pronunciation section. This you should not do, IMHO, since both etymology are pronunciation of "cod liver oil" are sum-of-parts and obvious. And even if the etymology were worth having, then you should be adding it rather than placing rfe around, since the etymology must be clear to you. --Dan Polansky (talk) 07:42, 18 January 2014 (UTC) Kept. — T AKASUGI Shinji (talk) 04:06, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment Dan Polansky wrote on my talkpage (permalink) about my changes to this entry (my first edit and second edit which added the 'context' label, his reversion) and left this message:
 * My response is, if this entry is found to be sum of parts and deleted, why would it matter whether we have or not have an ety/pron section anyway? And saying that those are sums of parts is akin to saying the whole entry is sum of parts in the context of this RFD. There are quite a comparable number of cites based on the first six or so hits for that seem to place it in a medicinal context, see cites 1 2 3 4 Lastly the ety section is what I have normally done when the information is not readily available, even were I to put   it would largely be toward acknowledging it's sum of parts origins and we would not be able to find out about how it entered medicinal and modern terminologies/vocabularies in its current form. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 08:21, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
 * We rarely include sense development in our etymologies, even though that is often of greater interest to normal humans than the PIE speculation that linguists seem to revel in. We can continue to remove ourselves from the world of normal humans by attempting to exclude such things - or we could add such items when warranted. I favor the latter course. DCDuring TALK 14:57, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm ambivalent on etymology, but the pronunciation of compound nouns is quite important because of unpredictable stress. Ƿidsiþ 15:10, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:cod liver oil


text:
Talk:wait up

wait up
Rfd-sense "To stay awake waiting for somebody to return." It is SOP wait + up (awake). --WikiTiki89 01:30, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep, clearly a set phrase. bd2412 T 03:14, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
 * In what way is it a set phrase? You get "be up all night", "stay up all night", "sit up all night", "wait up all night", etc. --WikiTiki89 03:19, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

 * Keep.
 * Cambridge definition: "to not go to bed at night because you are expecting someone to arrive"
 * Macmillan definition: "to not go to sleep until someone comes home"
 * Collins definition: "if you wait up, you deliberately do not go to bed, especially because you are expecting someone to return home late at night"
 * + another sense at Collins: American spoken "used for asking or telling someone to stop so that you can speak to them or walk with them"
 * I see it as almost a equivalent of Russian дожидаться/дождаться as opposed to ждать/подождать, ожидать (to wait) a variation of "wait". --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 03:49, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note that it's only the "stay awake" sense that's up for RFD. Russian дожидаться/дождаться may sometimes imply being awake, but it's not part of their meaning. In this case, the word "up" can be an adverb meaning "awake", in which case the phrase is SOP, or the word "up" can be part of a phrasal verb, which is definition number 1 and is not being RFD'd. --WikiTiki89 03:57, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

After looking into it some more, I think I'm ok with keeping it (I'm withdrawing the request). I was biased due to never having heard it used that way before and it just sounded odd to me. --WikiTiki89 04:06, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I immediately thought of the use that is well-defined by Collins: American spoken "used for asking or telling someone to stop so that you can speak to them or walk with them"
 * We should have that. DCDuring TALK 05:25, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
 * We do. --WikiTiki89 05:57, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Kept. RFD withdrawn. — T AKASUGI Shinji (talk) 10:56, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:wait up


text:
Talk:paternal filicide

maternal filicide
SOP. - -sche (discuss) 08:09, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

 * Keep as it's not obvious when one speaks of paternal filicide whether "filicide" refers to the son or the daughter. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 09:48, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
 * By that absurd criterion, any combination of terms that further disambiguates should be included. Car doesn't say what color the car is. Red car doesn't say what shade. Scarlet car doesn't specify the brand. etc. DCDuring TALK 18:50, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Oh, that mistaken impression is just due to a mistake my me; I'm sorry. I cleaned up the even-more-SOP-ly-worded definitions that had been in the entry ("a filicide that is paternal"), but was under the impression that "filicide" meant murder of a son only. I now see that it means murder of any of one's children, regardless of gender. - -sche (discuss) 19:08, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Oh ok then, well when you speak of it that way, "adjective X noun Y" is equivalent to "noun Y has property adjective X" (a property of adjectives being interchangeable word order) which thus proves it is SOP. "Red car" is equivalent to "car that is red". Delete TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 21:39, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Deleted. —msh210℠ (talk) 03:40, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:paternal filicide


text:
Talk:maternal filicide

maternal filicide
SOP. - -sche (discuss) 08:09, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

 * Keep as it's not obvious when one speaks of paternal filicide whether "filicide" refers to the son or the daughter. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 09:48, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
 * By that absurd criterion, any combination of terms that further disambiguates should be included. Car doesn't say what color the car is. Red car doesn't say what shade. Scarlet car doesn't specify the brand. etc. DCDuring TALK 18:50, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Oh, that mistaken impression is just due to a mistake my me; I'm sorry. I cleaned up the even-more-SOP-ly-worded definitions that had been in the entry ("a filicide that is paternal"), but was under the impression that "filicide" meant murder of a son only. I now see that it means murder of any of one's children, regardless of gender. - -sche (discuss) 19:08, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Oh ok then, well when you speak of it that way, "adjective X noun Y" is equivalent to "noun Y has property adjective X" (a property of adjectives being interchangeable word order) which thus proves it is SOP. "Red car" is equivalent to "car that is red". Delete TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 21:39, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Deleted. —msh210℠ (talk) 03:40, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:maternal filicide


text:
Talk:fétal

fétal
This word is labelled as an alternative spelling of. Etymologically, it would be correct: fœtus, from which fœtal is derived, is originally a hypercorrection (which already arises in Latin) for fetus. But in modern French, fœtal and fœtus are the only accepted spellings (they have even influenced the pronunciation itself), and fétal/fétus don't exist. --Fsojic (talk) 19:00, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

 * This is a WT:RFV matter rather than a WT:RFD matter, isn't it? As in, the question is whether or not fétal and fétus are attested (perhaps as reverse-corrections), and if they are, they will surely be kept. - -sche (discuss) 19:11, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Google Books provides at least this, this, and this usage. Fétale, fétaux, and fétales are all attested there too. It may be less common than fœtal, but it exists. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 19:34, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Indeed, so let's not delete it. --Fsojic (talk) 19:40, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Kept. — T AKASUGI Shinji (talk) 04:51, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:fétal


text:
ἐκεῖθεν

Etymology
From. This is the expected distal source demonstrative reflex.

Adverb

 * 1) from that place, thence
 * 2) there
 * 3) to that place, thither
 * 4) thence, from that place
 * 5)  thereafter, next
 * 1) there
 * 2) to that place, thither
 * 3) thence, from that place
 * 4)  thereafter, next
 * 1) to that place, thither
 * 2) thence, from that place
 * 3)  thereafter, next
 * 1)  thereafter, next
 * 1)  thereafter, next
 * 1)  thereafter, next

title: ἐκεῖθεν


text:
գրավ

Etymology
From. .

Noun

 * 1) pledge, security, surety
 * 2) deposit, prepayment
 * 3)  wager

title: գրավ


text:
κώμη

Etymology
. Has been compared to,.

Noun

 * 1) an unwalled village or country town
 * 2) a quarter or ward of a city
 * 1) a quarter or ward of a city
 * 1) a quarter or ward of a city
 * 1) a quarter or ward of a city
 * 1) a quarter or ward of a city
 * 1) a quarter or ward of a city
 * 1) a quarter or ward of a city
 * 1) a quarter or ward of a city
 * 1) a quarter or ward of a city
 * 1) a quarter or ward of a city
 * 1) a quarter or ward of a city

title: κώμη


text:
ruliĝi

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to roll move while turning on its axis
 * 2)  to roll move forward with an undulating movement
 * 3)  to go, move
 * 4)  to go travel in a wheeled vehicle
 * 1)  to go, move
 * 2)  to go travel in a wheeled vehicle
 * 1)  to go travel in a wheeled vehicle

title: ruliĝi


text:
rememorigi

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to recall to someone, bring to someone's mind

title: rememorigi


text: Category:aoz:Primates

title: Category:aoz:Primates


text:
шчыкалатка

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1)  ankle

title: шчыкалатка


text:
dissimilative

Adjective

 * 1) Pertaining to, modifying by, showing dissimilation.

title: dissimilative


text: Category:am:Primates

title: Category:am:Primates


text:
κρίμα

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) decision
 * 2) decree
 * 3) judgment
 * 4) sentence, condemnation
 * 5) lawsuit
 * 1) decree
 * 2) judgment
 * 3) sentence, condemnation
 * 4) lawsuit
 * 1) judgment
 * 2) sentence, condemnation
 * 3) lawsuit
 * 1) lawsuit
 * 1) lawsuit
 * 1) lawsuit

Alternative forms

 * (adverb, colloquial)

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * :a misdeed.

title: κρίμα


text: հաւատք

title: հաւատք


text:
viscôs

Etymology
From, from.

Adjective

 * 1) viscous
 * 2) sticky
 * 3) clammy, slimy
 * 4) viscid

title: viscôs


text:
Dromornithidae

Etymology
From.

Proper noun
†

Hyponyms

 * †Barawertornis, †, †, †Genyornis, †Ilbandornis

title: Dromornithidae


text:
venditôr

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) seller, vendor, salesman

title: venditôr


text:
Dromornis

Etymology
From +.

Proper noun
†

Hyponyms

 * Dromornis australis,

title: Dromornis


text:
User talk:Ugar001

Welcome
--Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 08:13, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ugar001


text:
Eisenwerkstoff

Noun

 * 1) ferrous material

title: Eisenwerkstoff


text:
Elektrophysiologie

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) electrophysiology

title: Elektrophysiologie


text: Erzeugnisse

title: Erzeugnisse


text: Erzeugnissen

title: Erzeugnissen


text:
開盤

Verb

 * 1)  to give the opening quotation on the stock exchange
 * 2)  to commence a new game
 * 3)  to commence trading

title: 開盤


text: 开盘

title: 开盘


text:
高管

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) executive; senior management

title: 高管


text: gāoguǎn

title: gāoguǎn


text: price-earnings ratios

title: price-earnings ratios


text:
市盈率

Noun

 * 1) price-earnings ratio

title: 市盈率


text: PE ratio

title: PE ratio


text: P-E ratio

title: P-E ratio


text: PE ratios

title: PE ratios


text: P-E ratios

title: P-E ratios


text:
信譽

Noun

 * 1) trustworthiness and reputation
 * 2)  credit; creditworthiness

Synonyms

title: 信譽


text: 信誉

title: 信誉


text: sofuto kurīmu

title: sofuto kurīmu


text:
m'ija

Etymology
From, removing the silent h.

title: m'ija


text:
P/E-luku

Etymology
P (for ) / E (for ) > 🇰🇲

Noun

 * 1)  price-earnings ratio, PE ratio, P-E ratio ratio of share price to earnings per share used as an indication of the relative value of the share

title: P/E-luku


text: dwarfs standing on the shoulders of giants


text:
пекарка

Etymology
From. Cognates include 🇨🇬 and 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) (female) baker

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * : female baker

Noun

 * 1) female baker

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * : baker

title: пекарка


text:
maʔa

Etymology
From, from.

Noun

 * 1) water

Etymology
From, from.

Noun

 * 1) water

title: maʔa


text:
anja

Noun

 * 1) water

title: anja


text:
дзы

Noun

 * 1) water
 * 2) river

title: дзы


text:
ə̀mùum

Noun

 * 1) water

title: ə̀mùum


text:
syur

Noun

 * 1) water

Etymology
From, from , from , from , from , from +.

Adverb

 * 1) sure; certain; positive

Adjective

 * 1) sure

Verb

 * 1) to make sure; to verify; to recheck; to use extra care or caution
 * 2) to  secure; to make oneself secure of

Interjection

 * 1) yes
 * 2) yes, of course

title: syur


text:
mpui

Noun

 * 1) water

Noun

 * 1) water

Noun

 * 1) water

title: mpui


text:
ημιτόνιο

Noun

 * 1)  semitone

title: ημιτόνιο


text:
шруба

Etymology
From, possibly via Polish.

Noun

 * 1) bolt, screw

title: шруба


text:
Fernsehröhre

Noun

 * 1) television tube

title: Fernsehröhre


text: ήπατος

title: ήπατος


text: ηπάτων

title: ηπάτων


text: ήπατα

title: ήπατα


text: Gerdes

title: Gerdes


text:
mølla

Noun

title: mølla


text:
ηπατικός

Adjective

 * 1)  hepatic

title: ηπατικός


text:
Geruchssinn

Noun

 * 1) smell (sense of)
 * 2) olfaction

title: Geruchssinn


text:
Gesundheitsgefährdung

Noun

 * 1) a health hazard

title: Gesundheitsgefährdung


text:
Glühröhrchen

Noun

 * 1) ignition tube

title: Glühröhrchen


text:
goldgrün

Adjective

 * 1) golden-green

title: goldgrün


text:
μου κόπηκαν τα ήπατα

Phrase
(literally: my livers were cut)

 * 1)  was scared stiff, was terrified, was scared shitless

title: μου κόπηκαν τα ήπατα


text:
Greenockit

Noun

 * 1)  greenockite

title: Greenockit


text:
Gressenicher

Noun

 * 1) A native or inhabitant of Gressenich

title: Gressenicher


text:
Gressenich

Proper noun

 * 1) A locality in the Stolberg district of Aachen

title: Gressenich


text:
Stolberg

Etymology
Habitational surname borrowed from.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Stolberg is the 34835th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 648 individuals. Stolberg is most common among White (94.6%) individuals.

title: Stolberg


text: Eisenwerkstoffe

title: Eisenwerkstoffe


text: Eisenwerkstoffen

title: Eisenwerkstoffen


text: Eisenwerkstoffs

title: Eisenwerkstoffs


text: Eisenwerkstoffes

title: Eisenwerkstoffes


text: Fernsehröhren

title: Fernsehröhren


text: Geruchssinne

title: Geruchssinne


text: Geruchssinnen

title: Geruchssinnen


text: Geruchssinns

title: Geruchssinns


text: Geruchssinnes

title: Geruchssinnes


text: Gesundheitsgefährdungen

title: Gesundheitsgefährdungen


text: Glühröhrchens

title: Glühröhrchens


text: Greenockite

title: Greenockite


text: Greenockiten

title: Greenockiten


text: Greenockits

title: Greenockits


text: Gressenichern

title: Gressenichern


text: Gressenichers

title: Gressenichers


text: goldgrüner

title: goldgrüner


text: goldgrüne

title: goldgrüne


text: goldgrünes

title: goldgrünes


text: goldgrünen

title: goldgrünen


text: goldgrünem

title: goldgrünem


text: geschwollener

title: geschwollener


text: geschwollenerer

title: geschwollenerer


text: geschwollenere

title: geschwollenere


text: geschwolleneres

title: geschwolleneres


text: geschwolleneren

title: geschwolleneren


text: geschwollenerem

title: geschwollenerem


text: geschwollenster

title: geschwollenster


text: geschwollenste

title: geschwollenste


text: geschwollenstes

title: geschwollenstes


text: geschwollensten

title: geschwollensten


text: geschwollenstem

title: geschwollenstem


text: geschwollene

title: geschwollene


text: geschwollenes

title: geschwollenes


text: geschwollenen

title: geschwollenen


text: geschwollenem

title: geschwollenem


text:
Hartlot

Noun

 * 1) (hard) solder (for brazing)

title: Hartlot


text:
hervorgehen

Verb

 * 1) to result; to follow (logically)
 * 2) to arise (from)

title: hervorgehen


text:
hämmerbar

Adjective

 * 1) malleable
 * 2) ductile

title: hämmerbar


text:
IGBCE

Proper noun

 * 1) The German trade union IG Bergbau, Chemie, Energie

title: IGBCE


text:
infrarotempfindlich

Adjective

 * 1) infrared-sensitive

title: infrarotempfindlich


text: afamiaríemos

title: afamiaríemos


text: afamiaríamos

title: afamiaríamos


text: afamiaríais

title: afamiaríais


text: afamiaríeis

title: afamiaríeis


text: afamiaríen

title: afamiaríen


text: afamiái

title: afamiái


text:
Inverkehrbringen

Noun

 * 1) marketing
 * 2) putting into circulation
 * 3) placing on the market
 * 4) circulating (money)

title: Inverkehrbringen


text: afamiando

title: afamiando


text: afamiada

title: afamiada


text: afamiao

title: afamiao


text: afamiaos

title: afamiaos


text: afamiaes

title: afamiaes


text:
Jakutien

Proper noun

 * 1) Yakutia

title: Jakutien


text: esmordigaño

title: esmordigaño


text: WAMZ

title: WAMZ


text: esmordigañes

title: esmordigañes


text: esmordigaña

title: esmordigaña


text: esmordigañamos

title: esmordigañamos


text: esmordigañáis

title: esmordigañáis


text: esmordigañen

title: esmordigañen


text: esmordigañaba

title: esmordigañaba


text: esmordigañabes

title: esmordigañabes


text: esmordigañábemos

title: esmordigañábemos


text: esmordigañábamos

title: esmordigañábamos


text: esmordigañabeis

title: esmordigañabeis


text: gitten

title: gitten


text: esmordigañabais

title: esmordigañabais


text: gitjes

title: gitjes


text: esmordigañaben

title: esmordigañaben


text: gitje

title: gitje


text: esmordigañé

title: esmordigañé


text: esmordigañasti

title: esmordigañasti


text: esmordigañesti

title: esmordigañesti


text: esmordigañó

title: esmordigañó


text: esmordigañemos

title: esmordigañemos


text: esmordigañastis

title: esmordigañastis


text:
coralín

Adjective

 * 1)  of the material coral

title: coralín


text:
coraxe

Noun

 * 1)  quality of a confident character

Etymology
From or, from.

Noun

 * 1) courage, boldness, audacity
 * 2) rage
 * 1) rage

title: coraxe


text: esmordigañestis

title: esmordigañestis


text: esmordigañaron

title: esmordigañaron


text: esmordigañara

title: esmordigañara


text: esmordigañare

title: esmordigañare


text: esmordigañares

title: esmordigañares


text:
coría

Noun

 * 1) (female)

title: coría


text:
coríu

Noun

 * 1)  aquatic bird of the family Anatidae
 * 2)  flesh of a duck used as food

title: coríu


text: esmordigañaras

title: esmordigañaras


text: esmordigañáramos

title: esmordigañáramos


text: esmordigañáremos

title: esmordigañáremos


text: esmordigañareis

title: esmordigañareis


text: contorsionistes

title: contorsionistes


text: coraxes

title: coraxes


text: esmordigañarais

title: esmordigañarais


text: corteces

title: corteces


text: coríes

title: coríes


text: coríos

title: coríos


text: esmordigañaran

title: esmordigañaran


text: esmordigañaren

title: esmordigañaren


text:
cubu

Noun

 * 1)   geometry: polyhedron having of six identical square faces
 * 2)   arithmetic: number raised to the third power
 * 3)  container

title: cubu


text: esmordigañe

title: esmordigañe


text: esmordigañas

title: esmordigañas


text: cuchella

title: cuchella


text:
cuciu

Adjective

 * , sharp mentally keen

title: cuciu


text: esmordigañéis

title: esmordigañéis


text: esmordigañan

title: esmordigañan


text: esmordigañaré

title: esmordigañaré


text: esmordigañarás

title: esmordigañarás


text:
culombiu

Noun

 * 1)  unit of electrical charge

title: culombiu


text:
curdu

Noun

 * 1)  language of Kurdistan

Noun

 * 1) flea
 * 2) tick

title: curdu


text: esmordigañará

title: esmordigañará


text: esmordigañaremos

title: esmordigañaremos


text:
cutu

Noun

 * 1)  weather

title: cutu


text:
cuñáu

Etymology
From.

title: cuñáu


text: esmordigañaréis

title: esmordigañaréis


text: esmordigañarán

title: esmordigañarán


text: esmordigañaría

title: esmordigañaría


text: esmordigañaríes

title: esmordigañaríes


text: cromosomes

title: cromosomes


text: croquetes

title: croquetes


text: cucaraches

title: cucaraches


text: cuchelles

title: cuchelles


text: esmordigañaríemos

title: esmordigañaríemos


text: curuxes

title: curuxes


text: cuñaos

title: cuñaos


text: cámares

title: cámares


text: cómodes

title: cómodes


text: esmordigañaríamos

title: esmordigañaríamos


text:
darvinianu

Adjective

 * 1)  relating to the theory of evolution

title: darvinianu


text:
darvinista

Adjective

 * 1)  relating to the theory of evolution

Noun

 * 1) Darwinist

title: darvinista


text: esmordigañaríais

title: esmordigañaríais


text:
de fechu

Adverb

 * 1)   actually, in truth

title: de fechu


text: esmordigañaríeis

title: esmordigañaríeis


text:
decibeliu

Noun

 * 1)  a common measure of sound intensity

title: decibeliu


text: esmordigañaríen

title: esmordigañaríen


text: esmordigañái

title: esmordigañái


text: esmordigañando

title: esmordigañando


text:
dedón

Etymology
From an augmentative of. Compare 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) big finger
 * 2)  digit

title: dedón


text:
deliriu

Noun

 * 1)  mental state of confusion

title: deliriu


text:
delitu

Noun

 * 1)  act violating the law

title: delitu


text: esmordigañáu

title: esmordigañáu


text:
democracia participativa

Noun

 * 1)  political system

Noun

 * 1)  participatory democracy political system emphasising participation in all decision-making

title: democracia participativa


text: esmordigañada

title: esmordigañada


text: esmordigañao

title: esmordigañao


text: darvinistes

title: darvinistes


text: decenios

title: decenios


text: decenii

title: decenii


text: esmordigañaos

title: esmordigañaos


text: dedones

title: dedones


text: participativas

title: participativas


text: participativa

title: participativa


text: participativos

title: participativos


text:
Bumpit

Etymology
Marketing coinage, perhaps.

Noun

 * 1) A plastic insert used to give women's hair extra height

title: Bumpit


text: esmordigañaes

title: esmordigañaes


text: valto

title: valto


text: valtes

title: valtes


text: valtamos

title: valtamos


text: valtáis

title: valtáis


text: valten

title: valten


text:
descansu

Noun

 * , break relief from exertion; state of quiet and recreation

title: descansu


text: valtaba

title: valtaba


text:
descubrimientu

Noun

 * 1)  something discovered

title: descubrimientu


text: valtabes

title: valtabes


text: valtábemos

title: valtábemos


text: desendolcu

title: desendolcu


text:
desigualdá

Noun

 * 1)  unfair, not equal, state

title: desigualdá


text: valtábamos

title: valtábamos


text:
desllealtá

Noun

 * 1)   quality of being disloyal

title: desllealtá


text: valtabeis

title: valtabeis


text: valtabais

title: valtabais


text: despiertu

title: despiertu


text: valtaben

title: valtaben


text: valté

title: valté


text:
destierru

Noun

 * 1)  the state of being banished from one's home or country

title: destierru


text: valtasti

title: valtasti


text:
desvistíu

Etymology
Compare 🇨🇬.

Adjective

 * 1)  not wearing any clothes

title: desvistíu


text: valtesti

title: valtesti


text: valtó

title: valtó


text: valtemos

title: valtemos


text: desendolcos

title: desendolcos


text: desigualdaes

title: desigualdaes


text: desllealtaes

title: desllealtaes


text: valtastis

title: valtastis


text: dictadures

title: dictadures


text: valtestis

title: valtestis


text: valtaron

title: valtaron


text: dificultá

title: dificultá


text:
dignidá

Noun

 * 1)  quality or state

title: dignidá


text: dificultaes

title: dificultaes


text: valtara

title: valtara


text:
dignu

Adjective

 * 1) worthy

title: dignu


text: valtare

title: valtare


text: valtares

title: valtares


text: valtaras

title: valtaras


text: dignidaes

title: dignidaes


text: valtáramos

title: valtáramos


text: valtáremos

title: valtáremos


text: valtareis

title: valtareis


text: valtarais

title: valtarais


text: valtaran

title: valtaran


text: valtaren

title: valtaren


text:
valte

Etymology
Borrowed from, from. . Cognate to (from 🇨🇬).

Verb

 * 1) only in the phrase:

title: valte


text: valtas

title: valtas


text: valtéis

title: valtéis


text: valtan

title: valtan


text: valtaré

title: valtaré


text: valtarás

title: valtarás


text: valtará

title: valtará


text: valtaremos

title: valtaremos


text: valtaréis

title: valtaréis


text:
bettlägerig

Adjective

 * 1) bedridden

title: bettlägerig


text:
Bettlägerigkeit

Noun

 * 1) bedriddenness

title: Bettlägerigkeit


text: Rhymes:Icelandic/ɛːɣʏr

title: Rhymes:Icelandic/ɛːɣʏr


text:
Bullockornis

Etymology
Apparently from (after, Australia) +.

Proper noun
†

title: Bullockornis


text: Category:roa-opt:Villages

title: Category:roa-opt:Villages


text: Category:German Low German intransitive verbs


text: gombokat

title: gombokat


text: gombbal

title: gombbal


text: gombokkal

title: gombokkal


text: felelőssége

title: felelőssége


text: támogatásban

title: támogatásban


text: támogatásokban

title: támogatásokban


text: garanciát

title: garanciát


text: garanciákat

title: garanciákat


text: célunk

title: célunk


text: javaslata

title: javaslata


text:
örömmel

Adverb

 * 1) gladly, willingly, with pleasure, with joy

title: örömmel


text: örömökkel

title: örömökkel


text: százalékra

title: százalékra


text: százalékokra

title: százalékokra


text:
dolguk

Etymology
From the stem of.

title: dolguk


text: tartalmaznia

title: tartalmaznia


text: kérdéssel

title: kérdéssel


text: kérdésekkel

title: kérdésekkel


text: kérdésnek

title: kérdésnek


text: kérdéseknek

title: kérdéseknek


text: cége

title: cége


text: pénze

title: pénze


text: mennyivel

title: mennyivel


text: témától

title: témától


text: témáktól

title: témáktól


text: mérkőzésen

title: mérkőzésen


text: mérkőzéseken

title: mérkőzéseken


text: mérkőzésnek

title: mérkőzésnek


text: mérkőzéseknek

title: mérkőzéseknek


text:
Geschmackssinn

Noun

 * 1) gustatory sense, sense of taste

title: Geschmackssinn


text: motivene

title: motivene


text: hétben

title: hétben


text: hetekben

title: hetekben


text:
hetet

Verb

 * 1)  (Etymology 4)
 * 2)  (Etymology 4)

title: hetet


text: heteket

title: heteket


text: külföldre

title: külföldre


text: kedvezményt

title: kedvezményt


text: kedvezményeket

title: kedvezményeket


text: tulajdonsága

title: tulajdonsága


text: országnak

title: országnak


text: országoknak

title: országoknak


text: Category:nb:Musical instruments

title: Category:nb:Musical instruments


text: Category:nn:Musical instruments

title: Category:nn:Musical instruments


text:
między-

Prefix

 * 1) inter-

title: między-


text: Category:Polish terms prefixed with między-


text:
równocześnie

Etymology
From. . Compare 🇨🇬.

Adverb

 * 1) simultaneously

Particle
particle

 * 1) simultaneously

title: równocześnie


text: 茄克

title: 茄克


text:
Gehörsinn

Noun

 * 1) aural sense, sense of hearing

title: Gehörsinn


text: regisztrációk

title: regisztrációk


text: regisztrációt

title: regisztrációt


text: regisztrációkat

title: regisztrációkat


text: feltételnek

title: feltételnek


text: feltételeknek

title: feltételeknek


text: cikke

title: cikke


text: eszközei

title: eszközei


text: gyakorlattal

title: gyakorlattal


text: gyakorlatokkal

title: gyakorlatokkal


text: gyakorlatnak

title: gyakorlatnak


text: gyakorlatoknak

title: gyakorlatoknak


text: osztályban

title: osztályban


text: osztályokban

title: osztályokban


text: osztályt

title: osztályt


text: osztályokat

title: osztályokat


text: nőknek

title: nőknek


text: nőkkel

title: nőkkel


text: társa

title: társa


text: társat

title: társat


text: társakat

title: társakat


text: hangulata

title: hangulata


text: kódokat

title: kódokat


text: vonalakban

title: vonalakban


text: vonalon

title: vonalon


text: vonalakon

title: vonalakon


text: törlése

title: törlése


text: felületet

title: felületet


text: felületeket

title: felületeket


text: évtizedben

title: évtizedben


text: évtizedekben

title: évtizedekben


text: évtizedet

title: évtizedet


text: évtizedeket

title: évtizedeket


text: választása

title: választása


text: lapokat

title: lapokat


text: lapokkal

title: lapokkal


text: lapokon

title: lapokon


text: lapra

title: lapra


text: lapokra

title: lapokra


text: lapnak

title: lapnak


text: lapoknak

title: lapoknak


text: lapban

title: lapban


text: lapokban

title: lapokban


text: szolgáltatása

title: szolgáltatása


text: oboene

title: oboene


text: oboar

title: oboar


text: oboane

title: oboane


text:
sędzina

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  judge's wife

title: sędzina


text: változatot

title: változatot


text: változatokat

title: változatokat


text: változatnak

title: változatnak


text: változatoknak

title: változatoknak


text: változattal

title: változattal


text: változatokkal

title: változatokkal


text: viszonya

title: viszonya


text: rendje

title: rendje


text: évfordulója

title: évfordulója


text: évtizede

title: évtizede


text: forgalmat

title: forgalmat


text: forgalmakat

title: forgalmakat


text:
titka

Etymology
From the stem of.

title: titka


text: jelszóval

title: jelszóval


text: élen

title: élen


text: éleken

title: éleken


text: folyamata

title: folyamata


text: ábrákat

title: ábrákat


text: ábrán

title: ábrán


text: ábrákon

title: ábrákon


text:
我肏

Interjection

 * : fuck me.

Usage notes

 * Occasionally written online with homophones and near-homophones for humor or to avoid censorship (see alternative forms).

title: 我肏


text:
wybraniec

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) the one
 * 2) the chosen one
 * 3)  draftee, inductee
 * 4)  candidate, electee
 * 1)  candidate, electee

title: wybraniec


text: izgalmasabb

title: izgalmasabb


text: legizgalmasabb

title: legizgalmasabb


text:
lelket

Etymology
From the stem of.

title: lelket


text:
lelkeket

Etymology
From the stem of.

title: lelkeket


text: cégnek

title: cégnek


text: cégeknek

title: cégeknek


text: végbe

title: végbe


text: gépeken

title: gépeken


text: gépeket

title: gépeket


text: előadása

title: előadása


text: hangokat

title: hangokat


text: hangokon

title: hangokon


text: hanggal

title: hanggal


text: hangokkal

title: hangokkal


text: információért

title: információért


text: információkért

title: információkért


text: információnak

title: információnak


text: információknak

title: információknak


text:
érzelem

Etymology
From the stem of.

Noun

 * 1) emotion, feeling especially such as like or dislike

title: érzelem


text:
érzelmek

Etymology
From the érzelm- stem of.

title: érzelmek


text: érzelmet

title: érzelmet


text:
érzelmeket

Etymology
From the érzelm- stem of.

title: érzelmeket


text: emberben

title: emberben


text: emberekben

title: emberekben


text: névvel

title: névvel


text: nevekkel

title: nevekkel


text:
lelkem

Etymology
From the stem of.

Noun

 * 1)  my soul
 * 2)  honey, sweetie, darling a term of endearment, especially by elderly women in the countryside
 * 1)  honey, sweetie, darling a term of endearment, especially by elderly women in the countryside

title: lelkem


text: letöltése

title: letöltése


text: funkciója

title: funkciója


text: magáért

title: magáért


text: turisták

title: turisták


text: Category:Armenian terms suffixed with -ք


text:
tárolás

Noun

 * 1) storage

title: tárolás


text: tárolások

title: tárolások


text: tárolása

title: tárolása


text: engedélyeket

title: engedélyeket


text: engedéllyel

title: engedéllyel


text: engedélyekkel

title: engedélyekkel


text: engedélynek

title: engedélynek


text: engedélyeknek

title: engedélyeknek


text: akarata

title: akarata


text: eseménye

title: eseménye


text: jellemzőbb

title: jellemzőbb


text: legjellemzőbb

title: legjellemzőbb


text: tanácsokat

title: tanácsokat


text: országa

title: országa


text:
Template:R:ZooBank

at

title: Template:R:ZooBank


text: tempoene

title: tempoene


text:
hozzászólás

Noun

 * 1) contribution (of an opinion to a discussion or a debate)

title: hozzászólás


text: hozzászólások

title: hozzászólások


text: hozzászólást

title: hozzászólást


text: hozzászólásokat

title: hozzászólásokat


text: hozzászólásra

title: hozzászólásra


text: hozzászólásokra

title: hozzászólásokra


text: hozzászólásért

title: hozzászólásért


text: hozzászólásokért

title: hozzászólásokért


text: hozzászólásban

title: hozzászólásban


text: hozzászólásokban

title: hozzászólásokban


text: hozzászóláshoz

title: hozzászóláshoz


text:
Template:R:ZooBank/documentation

Parameter 1 should be the number found by searching [ the site].

Parameter 2 is optionally a name other than the pagename.

title: Template:R:ZooBank/documentation


text: hozzászólásokhoz

title: hozzászólásokhoz


text: kezelést

title: kezelést


text: kezeléseket

title: kezeléseket


text: középkorban

title: középkorban


text: tárgyalást

title: tárgyalást


text: tárgyalásokat

title: tárgyalásokat


text: motort

title: motort


text: motorokat

title: motorokat


text: motornak

title: motornak


text: motoroknak

title: motoroknak


text: típusa

title: típusa


text: ilyeneket

title: ilyeneket


text: kilométerre

title: kilométerre


text: Category:hy:Animal sounds

title: Category:hy:Animal sounds


text: kilométerekre

title: kilométerekre


text: választáson

title: választáson


text: választásokon

title: választásokon


text: vendéget

title: vendéget


text: vendégeket

title: vendégeket


text: országból

title: országból


text: országokból

title: országokból


text: fájlt

title: fájlt


text: fájlokat

title: fájlokat


text: kedvencem

title: kedvencem


text: rendszerre

title: rendszerre


text: rendszerekre

title: rendszerekre


text: rendszertől

title: rendszertől


text: rendszerektől

title: rendszerektől


text: fordítása

title: fordítása


text:
mára

Noun

 * 1) vanity, futility

Etymology
From.

The Portuguese word comes from.

Verb

 * 1) to tie

title: mára


text: forintba

title: forintba


text: forintokba

title: forintokba


text:
Talk:Turčin

It also means Moslem Europeans in the Eastern Europe. See at [| To be Turk] (turkish) Manaviko (talk) 16:11, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes. Added. Kolmiel (talk) 17:28, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:Turčin


text: cégnél

title: cégnél


text: cégeknél

title: cégeknél


text: céggel

title: céggel


text: cégekkel

title: cégekkel


text:
Kadmierung

Noun

 * 1) cadmium-plating

title: Kadmierung


text: Kadmium

title: Kadmium


text:
Kakaopulver

Noun

 * 1) cocoa (powder)

title: Kakaopulver


text:
Eureptilia

Usage notes

 * Not widely accepted, but still understood and sometimes used in discussions of the phylogeny or mammals, birds, and reptiles.

Hyponyms

 * †, - clades

title: Eureptilia


text:
Krebsentstehung

Noun

 * 1) carcinogenesis

title: Krebsentstehung


text:
krebsauslösend

Adjective

 * 1) carcinogenic

title: krebsauslösend


text: Kunstdüngern

title: Kunstdüngern


text: թակարթ

title: թակարթ


text:
Kupferverhüttung

Noun

 * 1) copper smelting

title: Kupferverhüttung


text: Hartlote

title: Hartlote


text: Hartloten

title: Hartloten


text: Hartlots

title: Hartlots


text: Inverkehrbringens

title: Inverkehrbringens


text: Geschmackssinne

title: Geschmackssinne


text: Geschmackssinnen

title: Geschmackssinnen


text: Geschmackssinns

title: Geschmackssinns


text: Geschmackssinnes

title: Geschmackssinnes


text: Gehörsinne

title: Gehörsinne


text: Gehörsinnen

title: Gehörsinnen


text: Gehörsinns

title: Gehörsinns


text: Gehörsinnes

title: Gehörsinnes


text: Kadmierungen

title: Kadmierungen


text: Kadmiums

title: Kadmiums


text: Kakaopulvers

title: Kakaopulvers


text: Krebsentstehungen

title: Krebsentstehungen


text: bettlägeriger

title: bettlägeriger


text: Kupferverhüttungen

title: Kupferverhüttungen


text: bettlägerige

title: bettlägerige


text: bettlägeriges

title: bettlägeriges


text: bettlägerigen

title: bettlägerigen


text: bettlägerigem

title: bettlägerigem


text: hämmerbarer

title: hämmerbarer


text: hämmerbare

title: hämmerbare


text: hämmerbares

title: hämmerbares


text: hämmerbaren

title: hämmerbaren


text: hämmerbarem

title: hämmerbarem


text: krebsauslösender

title: krebsauslösender


text: krebsauslösende

title: krebsauslösende


text: krebsauslösendes

title: krebsauslösendes


text: krebsauslösenden

title: krebsauslösenden


text: krebsauslösendem

title: krebsauslösendem


text: infrarotempfindlicher

title: infrarotempfindlicher


text: infrarotempfindlicherer

title: infrarotempfindlicherer


text: infrarotempfindlichere

title: infrarotempfindlichere


text: infrarotempfindlicheres

title: infrarotempfindlicheres


text: infrarotempfindlicheren

title: infrarotempfindlicheren


text: infrarotempfindlicherem

title: infrarotempfindlicherem


text: infrarotempfindlichster

title: infrarotempfindlichster


text: infrarotempfindlichste

title: infrarotempfindlichste


text: infrarotempfindlichstes

title: infrarotempfindlichstes


text: infrarotempfindlichsten

title: infrarotempfindlichsten


text: concorsi di bellezza

title: concorsi di bellezza


text: infrarotempfindlichstem

title: infrarotempfindlichstem


text: spettacoli pubblici

title: spettacoli pubblici


text: palloni gonfiati

title: palloni gonfiati


text: infrarotempfindliche

title: infrarotempfindliche


text: fronti di temporali

title: fronti di temporali


text: infrarotempfindliches

title: infrarotempfindliches


text: infrarotempfindlichen

title: infrarotempfindlichen


text: canali di scolo

title: canali di scolo


text: infrarotempfindlichem

title: infrarotempfindlichem


text: gricci

title: gricci


text: gnagnere

title: gnagnere


text: buricchi

title: buricchi


text: ciucate

title: ciucate


text: sciarmutte

title: sciarmutte


text: barre inverse

title: barre inverse


text: glubis

title: glubis


text: glubit

title: glubit


text: glubimus

title: glubimus


text: glubitis

title: glubitis


text: glubunt

title: glubunt


text: glubam

title: glubam


text: glubes

title: glubes


text: glubet

title: glubet


text: glubemus

title: glubemus


text: glubetis

title: glubetis


text: glubent

title: glubent


text: glubebam

title: glubebam


text: glubebas

title: glubebas


text: glubebat

title: glubebat


text: glubebamus

title: glubebamus


text: glubebatis

title: glubebatis


text: glubebant

title: glubebant


text: glupsi

title: glupsi


text: glupsisti

title: glupsisti


text: glupsit

title: glupsit


text: glupsimus

title: glupsimus


text: glupsistis

title: glupsistis


text: glupserunt

title: glupserunt


text: glupsero

title: glupsero


text: glupseris

title: glupseris


text: glupserit

title: glupserit


text: glupserimus

title: glupserimus


text: glupseritis

title: glupseritis


text: glupserint

title: glupserint


text: glupseram

title: glupseram


text: glupseras

title: glupseras


text: glupserat

title: glupserat