text:
User talk:Estemle

Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Naming conventions or how to format them visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Help or add a question to the Village pump. Cheers! --maveric149

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: User talk:Estemle


text:
User talk:Etdube

Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Naming conventions or how to format them visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Help or add a question to the Village pump. Cheers! --maveric149

File:Polymtl nord 251x93.jpg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Polymtl nord 251x93.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:38, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Can you also confirm this is indeed your own image with the OTRS queue? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:35, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Polymtl nord 251x93.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Polymtl nord 251x93.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Papa November (talk) 09:40, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

title: User talk:Etdube


text:
User talk:Kronenpj

Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Naming conventions or how to format them visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Help or add a question to the Village pump. Cheers! --maveric149

title: User talk:Kronenpj


text:
User talk:Elnoyola~enwiki

Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Naming conventions or how to format them visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Help or add a question to the Village pump. Cheers! --maveric149

No problem. I just got really confused and thought I had read the wrong bit. I just reverted myself and then realised that what I had done really was what you were asking for. I rverted my revert! So it should be ok now. :) Angela 00:48, Oct 12, 2003 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Elnoyola. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Elnoyola~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:43, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 12:34, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Elnoyola~enwiki


text:
User talk:I am not Albert Herring

Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Naming conventions or how to format them visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Help or add a question to the Village pump. Cheers! --maveric149

title: User talk:I am not Albert Herring


text:
User talk:Pamdelion

Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Naming conventions or how to format them visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Help or add a question to the Village pump. Cheers! --maveric149

title: User talk:Pamdelion


text:
User talk:Llull

angelaHello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Naming conventions or how to format them visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Help or add a question to the Village pump. Cheers! --maveric149

Hi Llull. I left you a message on the Catalan Wikipedia. Just thought I'd better point it out as it's easy to miss things when you don't have a watchlist. Angela 05:39, Sep 21, 2003 (UTC)

 * My English is so bad and the article is bad. Llull 18:34, 1 Oct 2003 (UTC)

I moved this from the village pump in case you hadn't seen it yet:

 * In the Catalan Wikipedia we have more than 60 wrong pages that we want to delete but nobody can do it. Where I have to request the permition? Llull 18:26, 23 Sep 2003 (UTC)

 * As the Catalan Wikipedia is running on the old software, you need a password to delete articles. I think you would probably have to contact Jimbo ([mailto:jwales@bomis.com]) for this unless the developers are able to give it out. Angela 18:33, Sep 23, 2003 (UTC)
 * Yes, yes I told with Brion. Thnx. Nou I can. Llull 18:34, 1 Oct 2003 (UTC)

I need help in the Catalan version
We have lots of vandalism from Spanish nacionalists and others. We need ban them, but how? I have the password that let me to delete pages. ¿Is the same that let ban de people? Have I to request another password or I have to visit an other page with the same password? Thanks. Llull 10:12, 6 Nov 2003 (UTC)

 * Llull, please see AdminFeatures for documentation on the admin system on the old wikis. --Brion 21:39, 6 Nov 2003 (UTC)

Hello. Please use complete sentences rather than dictionary-style definitions, and highlight the title word or title phrase at its first appearance, like this. Michael Hardy 01:46, 23 Nov 2003 (UTC)

 * OK Llull 10:01, 23 Nov 2003 (UTC)

Thanks for catching brain-o in Catalan grammar. Not failing to understand "i", just got sloppy in the process of an edit that was a combination of markup & copy edit. Also you say you are "not sure if the aproximation of the meaning of these pronoums is correct." I'd appreciate it if you'd be more specific about what you have any doubts about, because I'd like to sort it out & get it right. As is obvious, my Catalan is not very good; I'm working on these translations partly by way of improving my language comprehension. It's about my 5th or 6th best language, and I don't even speak it well enough to properly carry on a conversation, so I could very well have misunderstood something. (Hopefully, if I don't get too busy with paid work - which I guess wouldn't be a bad thing - I'll be learning a lot more over the next few weeks!) And I would be very happy if you'd keep an eye on my work and let me know where I screw up, which I'm sure I sometimes will. -- Jmabel 07:04, 18 Jan 2004 (UTC)

Zero-byte image
Hello; I just deleted an image you uploaded back in August 2003, because it was zero bytes. It was Image:Occitania.jpg, and had the caption Flag from Occitania that use to represents the Occitan language. It's quite possible you already re-uploaded it or know about the upload error, but I thought I'd let you know just in case. --Delirium 09:54, Feb 17, 2004 (UTC)

Erronoeous edit
I have undone your edit at Republic of China. Please don't confuse this China with the People's Republic of China.--Jiang

Vic
"have like something typical the Bull" is not comprehensible English. Can you give on the talk page of that article (in Spanish or Catalan)

Dragonlance Gods Family Tree
On this page, Template:Pantheon of Dragonlance, you created a dragonlance gods family tree. You're missing a god, Mina. Currently very little is known about her, as the other gods have just realized that Mina is a god. Please add Mina on the side with a question mark. Thanks. ddcc 22:01, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

Mina
Putting her on the side with no links a question mark could work. ddcc 03:51, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks. I would have done it myself, but I'm not sure how to edit the family trees. ddcc 22:41, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

Riverwind image
Hello there! Regarding your latest edit in the Riverwind image, please specify who scanned it, the book name in spanish and publishing year. If you don't, the source won't be fulfilled, and I will revert it back to the version I have uploaded with the correct source. Thanks. -- ReyBrujo 20:57, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

 * Hehehehe. Esta bien. Sin embargo, existe una sección en la guía, la número 2, que dice An image of a rose, cropped from an image of a record album jacket, used to illustrate an article on roses. En otras palabras, tomar la imagen de una rosa de un disco para ilustrar el artículo sobre rosas no es legal. Por consiguiente, podría considerarse que utilizar la imagen de Riverwind (no conozco su nombre en español) de la tapa del libro para ilustrar el artículo sobre Riverwind no es legal. No estoy completamente seguro si esto es así o no. Sin embargo, si en futuro alguien del projecto Fair Use borra la imagen, es posible que se haya basado en este punto. Saludos. -- ReyBrujo 21:42, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

Biotechnology in Wikipedia:Version 1.0
This article has been identified by the Version 1.0 Editorial Team as a Core Topic. Biotechnology has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale, can we push it for Good Article? See the status of Biotechnology in Table. Hope you don't mind if I contact you in your English Talk page. --Victor.P.Das 08:13, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Well thanks for complementing my English. But I want some people to work with me, like WP:COTW such that it can moved from a Start-Stage through B-Class to a Good Article. When Version 1.0 is published the article on Biotechnology should be one of the best. Do you know any Wiki User who are interested? Are the members of Catalan Association of Biotechnology Wiki Users? Are you studying Biotechnology in University. Good luck for your exams. Regards. --Victor.P.Das 19:23, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

Biotechnology on 1.0 core topics collaboration of the fortnight
Biotechnology is a candidate for the1.0 core topics collaboration of the fortnight. Please see that page to support or comment on the nomination. --Victor 22:10, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
 * the article is now a 1.0 core topics collaboration of the fortnight. I've put up a template to do in the talk page. Please feel free to suggest any changes and/improvements to the article on this template. This article needs co-operative work of people like you. Thanks. --Victor 17:52, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Hi! Thank you for taking part in the COTF. But this work is far from over. The article's improvement in the COTF is termed as "little done" (Version_1.0_Editorial_Team/Core_topics/Core_topics_COTF). Please contribute and keep up the vigil against spammers. Good luck! --Victor 18:17, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Re: Images
Most are already in there, but I've added the rest except for the gnoll and the role-playing dice because they don't really relate to dragonlance. Also, check Category:Dragonlance images and Category:Dragonlance covers for any images you might have missed. ddcc 01:16, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

MtDNA
Thanks so much for reformatting Template:MtDNA. Now it matches Template:Y-DNA! — Reinyday, 21:28, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Your Opiniion On Article Merge Requested - Priority: Low
Should knockout mouse be merged into and become a section of gene knockout? Answer here --Username132 (talk) 19:24, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Riverwind the Plainsman cover.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Riverwind the Plainsman cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:27, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Biotechnology title 14
A tag has been placed on Template:Biotechnology title 14 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 16:00, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Biotechnology title 13
A tag has been placed on Template:Biotechnology title 13 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 16:01, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Son Goku family
Template:Son Goku family has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. —Farix (t | c) 17:31, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Catalan Wikipedia
Template:Catalan Wikipedia has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Evil IP address (talk) 19:24, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:DL CaramonAndCrysania.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:DL CaramonAndCrysania.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:27, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:DL CaramonAndCrysania.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:DL CaramonAndCrysania.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:32, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:DL CaramonAndCrysania.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:DL CaramonAndCrysania.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Psychonaut (talk) 18:22, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Portal:Dragonlance
Portal:Dragonlance, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Dragonlance and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Dragonlance during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:49, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Portal:Biotechnology
Portal:Biotechnology, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Biotechnology and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Biotechnology during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Mark Schierbecker (talk) 05:54, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:General links to subpage
Template:General links to subpage has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:54, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Asking
Template:Asking has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:44, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

title: User talk:Llull


text:
User talk:Mis uszatek

Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Naming conventions or how to format them visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Help or add a question to the Village pump. Cheers! --maveric149

title: User talk:Mis uszatek


text:
User talk:Almak

Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Naming conventions or how to format them visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Help or add a question to the Village pump. Cheers! --maveric149

title: User talk:Almak


text:
User talk:Dasein~enwiki

Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Naming conventions or how to format them visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Help or add a question to the Village pump. Cheers! --maveric149

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Dasein. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Dasein~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:21, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 11:58, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dasein~enwiki


text:
User talk:Jerph

Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Naming conventions or how to format them visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Help or add a question to the Village pump. Cheers! --maveric149

title: User talk:Jerph


text:
User talk:XbeenX

Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Naming conventions or how to format them visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Help or add a question to the Village pump. Cheers! --maveric149

title: User talk:XbeenX


text:
User talk:Zipdude

Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Naming conventions or how to format them visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Help or add a question to the Village pump. Cheers! --maveric149

Sunshine (Czech rock band)
A tag has been placed on Sunshine (Czech rock band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Shelf Skewed  Talk  11:55, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

 * You can recreate the article any time you wish, at the same article title. But the article must have some content and at least an assertion of notability--that is, some reason why this band ought to have a Wikipedia article. See Notability (music) for the type of information that can establish notability: reviews in independent reliable sources, charting a hit on any national chart, an international concert tour, etc. If you would like to make a place to work on the article before you submit it as a mainspace article, you can create your own personal sandbox by opening and editing the page User:Zipdude/sandbox. When you're ready to create the actual article, copy your raw text, open Sunshine (Czech band), paste your text there, edit more if you wish, preview to make sure everything's the way you want it, then save. Regards, -- Shelf Skewed  Talk  17:43, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

title: User talk:Zipdude


text:
User talk:Dunshi

１）遇事不要慌张，牢记操作要领：进一步熟悉交通规章制度，加强基本功训练，有意识锻炼自己的应变能力，做到遇事沉着冷静，操作自如，确保行车安全。

２）控制高速行车，克服骄傲情绪：要吸取“十次事故九次快”的教训，克服骄傲思想，控制高速行车，培养自己耐心、沉稳、礼貌的好作风。

３）遇有紧急情况，果断迅速处理。紧急情况处理的原则为：先踩制动踏板后打方向，转向盘不能只打不回，以免造成新的危险。

４）预防为主，确保行车安全：开车时，注意研究各类行人的心理状态和行动特点，养成善于观察，不开英雄车、赌气车的良好习惯。行驶中以鸣号为警告；以制动求保险；保持安全车距；遇见行人宁远离而行。

__________________________________________________

Collaboration on China-related topics
Hi Dunshi:

You may be interested in this: China-related topics notice board. Also read its talk page.

-- Felix Wan 22:45, 2004 Oct 30 (UTC)

China Collaboration of the Week
You showed interest in taking part in China-related topic development. I have just set up a China Collaboration of the Week. Please add one, or several, nomination(s) and tell others about it. You may access it via the COTW page at China-related topics notice board/ZHCOTW or through the shortcut WP:ZHCOTW. --[[User:OldakQuill|Oldak Quill]] 11:23, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Gwohngdongwaa pengyam
Please address the doubts raised at Votes for deletion/Gwohngdongwaa pengyam. In particular, the article doesn't explain the history and origins of this romanization. The same objections seem to be applicable to Penkyamp. Can you update the articles with the information about the history of these systems? In particular, can you add some reputable external links or books, is it is in, e.g., Jyutping article? Thank you, Mikkalai 01:12, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Penkyamp
Please also address the doubts raised at Votes for deletion/Penkyamp. -- Felix Wan 19:31, 2004 Dec 31 (UTC)

Thank you for your support on keeping Penkyamp, but you have forgotten to sign your comment. Please sign it to make sure that they count your vote. Also, you should add your comment to the end of the list, not the beginning. -- Felix Wan 08:01, 2005 Jan 2 (UTC)

Thanks for leaving me a message. Unfortunately, I can't understand what you're trying to say. If it's important, please try writing again using plainer language (for example, I'm not sure if you intended any irony, or not). Wyss 20:35, 4 Jan 2005 (UTC)

My only point is that this looks like original research to me and as such it's not appropriate for an article in Wikipedia. With wider acceptance and some peer-review, perhaps one day it will be. Wyss 22:48, 4 Jan 2005 (UTC)

China-stub
I invite you to resolve the issue over the picture for the China-stub at Template talk:China-stub. -- AllyUnion (talk) 10:16, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Penkyamp
 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete.

This was a difficult thread to decide. I have temporarily moved the article to User:Felix Wan/Penkyamp so that he can continue to do some additional research. If the use of this scheme can be more definitively sourced, it may become a candidate for Votes for undeletion. Rossami (talk) 22:34, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Penkyamp
Original research? I posted the question to some of contributors. Mikkalai 01:49, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)

See also Votes for deletion/Gwohngdongwaa pengyam

 * Keep. I don't think the lack of previous on-line presence is reason enough to delete. Secondly, Beijing University Cantonists seem to be using or at least promoting it. Thirdly, I've learned the system myself. Beijing linguists might be referring to in using a name in Chinese character or a different name altogether.
 * User:Dunshi voted twice in one edit (see another vote below) --Jiang
 * Delete. A first look at the Google results show an impressive number of hits on penkyamp. Thousands. But, after eliminating -wikipedia, -wiktionary, -OpenFacts, and the other obvious clone pages, there's barely 1000 hits left -- most of which are also clone pages, which do not attribute to Wikipedia. That's not really passing the Google test.... If it is indeed an underground Cantonese romanization movement. It's a pretty weak one! And in regard to the somewhat widespread appearance of Penkyamp in WP itself, I'm afraid I'm somehow responsible for that...due to my ignorance. When I first came to WP, I was very into adding Romanizations to Chinese-related articles, and I thought that -- without checking other sources, even Google -- that Penkyamp is the official HK romanization system -- which is obviously not true. So, instead of saying "offfical HK system", I wrote "Penkyamp", thinking it's a name I haven't heard, but synonymous. Mea culpa, mea maxima culpa...Feel free to flagellate me, metaphorically. --Menchi 02:22, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, as explained above, this is a neologism first invented for use on Wikipedia to describe a non peer-reviewed romanization scheme. Wyss 02:28, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. I once suspected that article was original research but later reversed my position. See Talk:Penkyamp for detail. I even created a Yahoo! Groups Forum to deal with this matter, where I learned about its popularity among enthusiasts in Guangzhou. Unfortunately the Internet does not have much information on it. The article has received much more collaborative work from Wikipedians and the system is used by some Wikipedians in Romanizing Cantonese. It is also mentioned byomniglot although that could have been a self-fulfilling prophecy. I request to give a benefit of doubt to the defendant and keep this article. Also, since deleting both Penkyamp and Gwohngdongwaa pengyam will result in loss of information. I would like to keep a copy as a subpage of my user page if this article cannot survive VfD, although it seems that someone want to disallow that practice in another VfD. -- Felix Wan 03:04, 2004 Dec 31 (UTC)
 * Having a small number of local enthusiasts and having a club ... How "popular" is this? Guangzhou, a big city, is not exactly lacking in Internet. One'd imagine a popular romanization movement to be popular on the net as well. After all, Cantonese romanization is not often used within the China itself. Not to mention that it is a recent invention, and not an ancient scroll which could have difficulty reaching the Net. --Menchi 03:13, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Good point. Just to set the record straight, this article was not likely to be created by the same author of the other related article on the VfD. See their history pages . -- Felix Wan 20:35, 2004 Dec 31 (UTC)
 * This article was originally at [Cantonese Romanization] before I moved it to its current location. The original text equated Cantonese Romanization to Penkyamp which might have led to more confusion. Given Menchi's explanation, I'm leaning towards delete. Fringe movements have no place here. If kept, it should be given as much coverage as it is important (that is, it should be delinked in all places except the article on Cantonese). Perhaps we can give it passing mention in a general article on Cantonese Romanization or at Cantonese (linguistics) (or at least merge some of its info there), but as a stand alone article, I dont think it should exist.--Jiang 20:11, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your comments. If such an article cannot survive VfD here, will it be eligible for WikiSource or some other Wiki outlets? -- Felix Wan 20:35, 2004 Dec 31 (UTC)
 * As Jiang said, I think it should be given a passing mention in Cantonese Romanization. Coverage is supposed to be proportional to support, after all. --Xiaopo ℑ 20:45, Dec 31, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, see previous Gwohngdongwaa pengyam vote. Megan1967 00:43, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep: Fellow Wikipedians, please pause and think for a second: do you know the exact origin and meaning of "penkyamp" in the Cantonese language? Proper nouns(let's have no doubt that "Penkyamp" is indeed a proper name for the orthography), have varying degrees of SPECIFICITY. The fact that the name "penkyamp" does not automatically lead us to the origin of such system doesn't mean that such system wasn't in use under different names. Let's see: "penkyamp" as a GENERAL NOUN is inspired by Mandarin "pinyin", which is itself both a proper name for a system and a general noun designating "phonetic script". As a result, "penkyamp" as a general noun has been in use among the Cantonese referring to any phonetic script since at least the birth of the Mandarin Pinyin. And "Penkyamp" as a proper noun for a specific system might not be in place well after this system was in use for many years, only until it was introduced to us as such. What if on-line records before 2003 has been mostly erased?
 * Besides, the article started under the entry Cantonese Romanization instead of Penkyamp. Maybe back then "Penkyamp" wasn't finalized as its only proper name. It could be "Lomazi" or "Zeuyamp". At least it's nothing as specific as "Jyutpin" (a name that is hightly stylized and specified as a "PINyin"--note: not a Cantonese pronunciation--- of the "Jyut"(Guangdong)-- nothing can get as specific as this, which will garantee to trace back to its origin as an officially sponsored scheme). But "penkyamp" is not as specific as this. It means "phonetic script", is spelled as is pronounced in Cantonese, and is in circulation among the Cantonese thanks to the already existing Mandarin "Pinyin". I urge you to think twice about our obsession with the specificity of the proper name of the entry: what you call "Penkyamp" is actually of secondary relevance. The question is, what kind of usage, or systems were in existence before this name was finalized, on Wikipedia? Dunshi 18:44, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)

 * It would be great if this article were a general overview of Cantonese Romanizations, but it is not. It is on a specific Romanization used by only a handful of people, if at all. If this article is not converted to what you portray it to be then it should be deleted. As long as what you say doesn't exist on wikipedia, I dont see a reason or argument to keep.--Jiang 08:13, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * uninformed keep . I posted this for vfd for the sole reason of the similarity between this article and Gwohngdongwaa pengyam. And both of them lack of historical references: history of developments, prominent contributors, as well as lack of external references. Dunshi, I believe you (as much as uninformed person may believe), but these drawbacks of the article must be eliminated, to ensure credibility. Mikkalai 18:59, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * One would think that something complete unsourced and unheard of should be deleted instead of kept. Maybe if we dont hear about it then it doesnt exist?--Jiang 08:13, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Only notable because of Wikipedia forks. Jayjg |  (Talk)  04:25, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * I've already explained the "name issue". So if you want to search google, at least search under something other than "penkyamp". What is the name of the English orthographic system, anyway? "Script"? "Webster Orthography"?
 * Rather than engaging in word battles, please put additional verifyable information about the usage of the system into the article. Chinese refernces will do, if there is nothing in English. Some of us read Chinese, I think. Mikkalai 22:29, 4 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * I still doubt the reliability of google, as I have discovered that Yahoo! groups information and discussions on Cantonese romanization before 2002 are totally non-existent. Needless to say, they were simply erased, as I definitely participated in these discussions. I hope someone can reach James Campbell, aka Glossika, a Western linguist on the Chinese language living in Taiwan, who might have passing aquaintance of Cantonese romanization schemes which surfaced in online communities around late 90s. I doubt the name "Penkyamp" was much used back then. A friend I used to communicate with using modified Cantonese romanization in early 90s was Li Zhu of Guangzhou. I have lost touch with him since 95. Guangzhou is a city where Cantonese romanization schemes were experimented as early as the 1930s. The Internet did not exist in that city until at least 1996 and traffics with foreign countries are still quite tightly controlled. (for one, I doubt that Mainland Chinese have free access to Wikipedia). These are my arguments against the reliability of google search on Guangzhou Cantonese romanization schemes.
 * keep. This article is a detailed one, and the system does exist. -- 10:32, January 4, 2005, UTC
 * (please note that this vote is unsigned) Wyss 22:52, 4 Jan 2005 (UTC)

 * Delete. IMO 5 days was enough for the main supporter to provide more confirmation, instead of writing Webster Orthography article. As for reliability of google, we are well aware the it may only prove the existence. If google fails, then please provide other confirmations. Sorry about that, but unconfirmed articles are against the rules. Mikkalai 23:49, 4 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * I must add, it's time for this article to go. Wyss 04:55, 5 Jan 2005 (UTC)

 * Comment Hi, I'm kind of new here. I find this discussion fascinating. Though I'm not casting a vote (I'm not sure I'm eligible anyway since I'm new), I would like to leave a comment. I'm part Chinese, but I was born in the West. Unfortunately, I didn't learn Chinese as I was growing up. But I find it to be extremely fascinating, so I'm doing what I can right now to learn Mandarin, Cantonese, and reading/writing. It's a slow arduous process, but I'm having a lot of fun along the way. Though I enjoy both, I personally feel Cantonese is the more interesting of the two dialects. Concerning transcription schemes, I think I'm in a good position to comment on it. As a non-native speaker learning Cantonese, I'm actually in the position of needing to use the transcription schemes. Cantonese may not have a single "standard" romanization scheme, but I think that is part of what makes it interesting. When I started learning Cantonese, I mainly learned from friends and colleagues. But that didn't provide the structure that I wanted, so I bought a book that I found at a local bookstore. That book used its own version of a romanization scheme. I searched the internet and local libraries to help me find additional materials to help me learn Cantonese. This is my own experience only, but the websites that I found useful on the Internet were using LSHK's jyutping. And the books I found in the libraries in my city were using other (perhaps older) schemes like Sidney Lau. But I think that's okay, because a transcription scheme is just a tool for learning Cantonese. I think that the preference in transcription schemes is just the prerogative of the person teaching it. By the way, I never came across Penkyamp until I came to Wikipedia. About learning Cantonese, I came across a statement in Wikipedia's own Cantonese (linguistics) article in the Romanization section that states, "learners may feel frustrated that most native Cantonese speakers, no matter how educated they are, really don't understand any romanization system." I respectfully disagree. That statement wrongly suggests that the education of a native speaker has anything to do with the matter. My opinion is that native speakers shouldn't have to learn a romanization system for their own language. The romanization system isn't actually part of the language after all. Why should native speakers be forced to learn something that won't be useful for them? It would only be useful for the rest of us who are learning. I personally feel that it would be selfish for us (learners) to expect the native population to go through all that trouble just to make it easier for us. Please excuse me if I'm too opinionated about this. I mean no disrespect to anyone. Good luck to both sides of the Penkyamp argument. Happy New Year to everyone. --Wang123 Friday, January 7, 2005 at 09:01:01 UTC.
 * Keep Vote retracted: see Addendum Sorry. I originally intended to stay neutral in this debate over whether to keep or delete the Penkyamp article. But after some consideration, I’ve come to the opinion that there is not enough reason to delete the article. Being so new to Wikipedia, I don’t know if I’m eligible to vote in this poll, so I won’t mind if you don’t count my vote. But, if nothing at all, I hope you guys will listen to my reasoning. So here it is: I don’t think that the Penkyamp article should be deleted, because that would cause a loss of information. It is the duty of an encyclopedia to provide information. In addition, I don’t think that a lack of popularity for a transcription scheme warrants not including it in an encyclopedia. If Penkyamp should be deleted, then why shouldn’t all the transcription schemes be deleted. After all, none of the Cantonese transcription schemes have gained wide acceptance. Furthermore: I feel that it is the duty of Wikipedia to provide information rather than promote a cause. Thus, there is no reason for the hostility between supporters of different transcription schemes. Supporters of Penkyamp should feel free to provide an informative article on Penkyamp in Wikipedia, and supporters of other schemes, like my personal favorite LSHK’s jyutping, should feel free to provide an informative article on their scheme in Wikipedia. But I strongly feel that the articles should be limited to only providing information on how to use each transcription scheme and not advocate any one as better than another. Wikipedia should strive to provide impartial information on such a benign topic. --Wang123 Friday, January 7, 2005 at 10:16:16 UTC. .... Addendum: I just read the arguments for deleting the other article, Gwohngdongwaa pengyam. Now I understand the point of view where all those ‘delete’ votes are coming from. Wow, this is problematic. I understand now that the debate over deleting Penkyamp (and the other one) is not over which transcription scheme is more popular or over which one is better, but over whether Penkyamp and Gwohngdongwaa pengyam are actually legitimate transcription schemes. Since I feel that Wikipedia should not be used as a portal to further a cause, then of course we should not have an article on Penkyamp if it is indeed illegitimate. I’m sorry that I didn’t understand this debate until now. I don’t know how legitimate either scheme is, and I’m unfortunately not in a position to find out. So I respectfully retract my vote. --Wang123 Friday, January 7, 2005 at 10:47:28 UTC.
 * Additional Note: As a note, I just checked the online Chinese Character Database, Chinese Character Database: With Word-formations Phonologically Disambiguated According to the Cantonese Dialect, at the website of the Chinese University of Hong Kong's Research Centre for Humanities Computing. That database can be used to show Cantonese pronunciations of Chinese characters, and it works with 7 transcription schemes. Penkyamp and Gwohngdongwaa pengyam (as described in Wikipedia's articles) are both not among those seven. In case you guys are curious, those seven are: LSHK's jyutping, Yale, Yale Orthodox, Wong Shik Ling, IPA, Canton, and Sidney Lau. I checked each one of them. None of them are Penkyamp or Gwohngdongwaa pengyam. --Wang123 Friday, January 7, 2005 at 11:12:17 UTC
 * Thanks for your comment Wang123. The Internet has its own treacherousness and I just recently found out that the pre-2002 discussions and articles in Penkyamp is all lost to data crunching and I guess it's none of our fault that Penkyamp is deleted for "not meeting Wikipedia rules". I just wish, that people like you, me and FelixWan who has seen something of value in Penkyamp could get together (cybernetically speaking of course) as in a Penkyamp Society and study this scheme further, along with the official Jyutping and the foreign Yale. Perhaps this way we can find Cantonese Romanizationists in the Mainland later on as the Web becomes less hindered by government control. Please note that Wikipedia's information on any Pinyin inspired Mainland Cantonese romanization system is blank. But such schemes exist.
 * Please don't misunderstand me. I've never used Penkyamp, and therefore have no opinion on the value of Penkyamp. Penkyamp could be a great transcription scheme, but I don't know for myself because I've never had the opportunity to use it. I only first heard of Penkyamp when I came to Wikipedia. By the way, to Felix_Wan, are you still working on an overhaul of the Cantonese Wikipedia articles? I love Cantonese, and I'd like to commend you for taking on such a big task. Is there any way I can help? --Wang123 Saturday, January 8, 2005 at 09:07:19 UTC
 * I don't want deletion to happen to less published Chinese dialect phonetic scripts such as the Wu-Shanghainese Romanization, the Mogo dialect syllabary, and many Minnan systems simply because they appear original, but are in fact well known in off-line circles.
 * Keep. I don't see overwhelming proof that this is original research or a vanity page.  Sure, it's a minor scheme, but there are plenty of others on Wikipedia too (cf. Nihon-shiki, Gwoyeu Romatzyh) and merely being obscure, neglected or unpopular is not a criterion for deletion. Jpatokal 08:59, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * The Penkyamp article is extremely biased. If it is kept, then it must be rewritten to conform to Wikipedia's NPOV policy. Wang123 08:29, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.

Template:Bush-stub
This is to say that Template:Bush-stub, which you created, is up for deletion at Templates for deletion. (I'm afraid I voted against it.) If you still find it important, you might want to list your arguements, or at least vote in favor of keeping it. -- Itai 02:11, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Bush-stub
I put subst: before to ensure that the template would still show after it's deleted. Just to let you know, because it's going to be deleted shortly. Sorry for any trouble I may have caused. -Frazzydee|✍ 03:30, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Image source
Thank you for uploading Image:Amy Lu.jpeg3.jpeg. Please leave a note on that page about the source of the image because of copyright law. Thank you. --Ellmist 02:17, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Image copyright
Thank you for uploading Image:Manwen.gif and for stating the source. However, its copyright status is unclear, so it may have to be deleted. If it is open content or public domain, please give proof of this on the image page. If the image is fair use, please provide a rationale. Thank you. --Alan Au 06:02, 13 May 2005 (UTC)

Current events
I'm not sure why you made those changes to current events. You deleted a link to a news story, added some weird wording, and changed the tense of some other stuff. These changes didn't really help. CryptoDerk 18:56, May 20, 2005 (UTC)

[[Image:Chinesedragon.jpg]]
The image you submitted for use with the China-stub stub template is likely to be deleted soon unless details of its copyright status can be provided. Speaking for myself, it would be nice to not have to find another image. Caerwine 22:54, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

Blue Mediterranean
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Blue Mediterranean, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Blue Mediterranean. Caerwine Caer’s whines 03:13, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Red Mediterranean
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Red Mediterranean, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Red Mediterranean. Caerwine Caer’s whines 03:13, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:Manjiangwen.gif
File:Manjiangwen.gif is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Manjiangwen.gif. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case:. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 07:00, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Nomination of Akrom Yo‘ldoshev for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Akrom Yo‘ldoshev is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Akrom Yo‘ldoshev until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 22:19, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

occupy
The "occupy the dollar" will not initially take the form of printed paper bills. It will take the form of special wristbands with uniform design (for example, with "occupy the dollar" imprinted on it, with uniform width and thickness)

The colours of the "occupy the dollar" will be of four different colours representing the pluralistic viewpoints of participants.

1) Green 2) Red 3) Black 4) White -- clean govt and non-descript populism

Green is lowest value and is most abundant, followed by Red, followed by Black, and finally followed by White

Equitably distributed as a "foodstamp" to assure wristband holders' subsistance (food, daily necessities). So basically, encourage sharing: should ensure your immediate neighbors (not just companions) have enough wristbands to barter/buy enough substance. If your neighbor is out of wristbands, ensure that you share wristband values, or share daily necessities.

Secondly, award creativity with wristbands: Artists may get them as appreciation.

Thirdly, donate to charitable causes using wristbands.

Maker of the wristband teams up with volunteer groups providing necessities, food. So much wristbands will end up in the hands of volunteer groups. Be creative with large wristband reserves.

All participants can reject wristband on the basis of irregular design. They have right to demand design to be exact width, colours matching the four aforementioned colours, and letters printed on top, and not to be defaced by permanent damages.

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Northern Alliance (Canada) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Northern Alliance (Canada) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Northern Alliance (Canada) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Huon (talk) 12:46, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dunshi


text:
User talk:Philb

Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Naming conventions or how to format them visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Help or add a question to the Village pump. Cheers! --maveric149

nice work with cardiac arrythmias -- sadly there was already an article at cardiac arrythmia :) --people at cleanup are merging it with the original article.

title: User talk:Philb


text:
User talk:RareEarth

Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Naming conventions or how to format them visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Help or add a question to the Village pump. Cheers! --maveric149

title: User talk:RareEarth


text:
User talk:TEG24601

Much thanks
thanks for creating the WASR highway images! I appreciate the time you put into them! --Rschen7754 22:08, September 4, 2005 (UTC)

Washington State Route 20
Hi TEG24601; I restored your edits to Washington State Route 20 that was removed by SkagitRiverQueen in December and who was blocked for a year in March. The removal of that content was not with the consensus of the other editors of the article. Best wishes, Walter Siegmund (talk) 14:52, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

USRD WikiProject Newsletter, Winter 2012

 * —  Imzadi 1979  →   22:18, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

USRD WikiProject Newsletter, Spring 2012

 * —  Imzadi 1979  →   23:57, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

USRD Summer 2012 Newsletter

 * —  Imzadi 1979  →   23:03, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

The Center Line: U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter, Winter 2013

 * —EdwardsBot (talk) 19:48, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

The Center Line: Spring 2013

 * —EdwardsBot (talk) 22:23, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Your edits to Washington State Route 525
The official name of the byway on Washington State Route 525 is the "Whidbey Island Scenic Byway" according to WSDOT and FHWA (on their byways website), cited in the RD. The Cascade Loop is an unofficial byway, so it doesn't meet notability guidelines.  Sounder Bruce  16:14, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

The Center Line: Summer 2013

 * —EdwardsBot (talk) 22:18, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Whidbey Telecom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:48, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:SouthwhidbeySD.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:SouthwhidbeySD.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:13, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

The Center Line: Fall 2013

 * —EdwardsBot (talk) 03:08, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

The Center Line: Winter 2013

 * —MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:15, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

The Center Line: Spring 2014

 * —MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:05, 8 June 2014 (UTC) on behalf of

The Center Line: Summer 2014

 * —MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Imzadi1979, 21:50, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

The Center Line: Fourth Quarter 2014

 * —MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of 10:38, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

The Center Line: Winter 2015

 * —MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of 18:37, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

The Center Line: Spring 2015

 * —MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Imzadi1979 12:17, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

The Center Line: Summer 2015

 * —MediaWiki message delivery (talk) delivered on behalf of Imzadi1979 05:23, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

The Center Line: September 2015
  Volume 8, Issue S1 • September 2015 • About the Newsletter
 * Happy 10th Anniversary!

1=

• USRD through the years

• A goal for success

• From the first spinning cogs to controlling the power of the moon 1=

• Article assessment over time

• How to measure a WikiProject's load

• Conflict over article titles 1=

• Arbitration case closes

• Collaboration

• Our valued contributors

 Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS
 * —delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Imzadi1979 (talk) on 23:58, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

The Center Line: November 2015
  Volume 8, Issue 4 • November 2015 • About the Newsletter

1=
 * Departments

• Assessment roundup

• Portal selected articles and pictures

• KML Corner 1=
 * Features

• Constructing a road junction list

• WikiConference USA 2015

• The Junction template and you

• Harnessing map archives 1=
 * State and national updates

• State updates

• In other project news...

 Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS
 * —delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of on 22:59, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:41, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

The Center Line: Spring 2017
  Volume 9, Issue 1 • Spring 2017 • About the Newsletter

1=
 * Departments

• Assessment roundup

• Portal selected articles and pictures 1=
 * Features

• Commons and Wikidata revamp

• Route logs for junction lists

• Finding friends at the DOT

• This space for rent 1=
 * State and national updates

• State updates

• In other project news...

 Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS
 * —delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of on 01:04, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

The Center Line: Fall 2023
  Volume 10, Issue 1 • Fall 2023 • About the Newsletter • A New Future for Road Articles Online  Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS
 * Features
 * —delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of  Imzadi 1979  →  on 19:00, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

title: User talk:TEG24601


text:
User talk:Rzebro

Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Naming conventions or how to format them visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Help or add a question to the Village pump. Cheers! --maveric149

Hi! To create an automatic redirect, either type #REDIRECT Insert non-formatted text here or hit the little key marked "#R" at the top of any page open for editing. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 17:42, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

 * PS: Replace "Insert non-formatted text here" with the name of the title you wish the redirect to point to.  --PMDrive1061 (talk) 17:43, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

title: User talk:Rzebro


text:
User talk:JimTheFrog

Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Naming conventions or how to format them visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Help or add a question to the Village pump. Cheers! --maveric149

Notice of Dispute resolution discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we are requesting your participation to help find a resolution. The thread is "Talk:UltraViolet (system)". {| style="border: 0; width: 100%;"
 * style="width: 50%; vertical-align: top;" |
 * style="width: 50%; vertical-align: top;" |

If you wish to open a DR/N filing, click the "Request dispute resolution" button below this guide or go to Dispute resolution noticeboard/request for an easy to follow, step by step request form.

What this noticeboard is:

 * It is an early step to resolve content disputes after talk page discussions have stalled. If it's something we can't help you with, or is too complex to resolve here, our volunteers will point you in the right direction.

What this noticeboard is not:

 * It is not a place to deal with the behavior of other editors. We deal with disputes about article content, not disputes about user conduct.
 * It is not a place to discuss disputes that are already under discussion at other dispute resolution forums.
 * It is not a substitute for the talk pages: the dispute must have been discussed extensively on a talk page (not just through edit summaries) before resorting to DRN.
 * It is not a court with judges or arbitrators that issue binding decisions: we focus on resolving disputes through consensus, compromise, and explanation of policy.

Things to remember:

 * Discussions should be civil, calm, concise, neutral, and objective. Comment only about the article's content, not the other editors.   Participants who go off-topic or become uncivil may be asked to leave the discussion.
 * Let the other editors know about the discussion by posting {{subst:drn-notice}} on their user talk page.
 * Sign and date your posts with four tildes " ".
 * If you ever need any help, ask one of our volunteers, who will help you as best as they can. You may also wish to read through the FAQ page located here and on the DR/N talkpage.

Please take a moment to review the simple guide and join the discussion. Thank you! EarwigBot   operator  /  talk 22:11, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Dispute resolution filed.
In order to determine whether the UltraViolet article should have a POV tag, or whether it should not, I filed for dispute resolution. Another issue to be discussed is whether the substantial source you gave and wrote would help to resolve the POV issue, or make it worse, if such an issue is deemed to exist. Dispute_resolution_noticeboard --BurritoBazooka (talk) 22:13, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, you were looking in the wrong place.. in fact, I filed it in the wrong place (it shouldn't have been a dispute resolution, but something else). One of my concerns was whether I can use a source which was generated completely by someone deeply involved in the system (related to WP:SELFCITE), and whether that could make the POV even worse. I'll do it anyway, later, when I have time (probably next week Sunday or so). If someone else sees harm, then it will be raised. Hopefully I can find some secondary sources. --BurritoBazooka (talk) 00:26, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Whether or not someone has intimate knowledge of a topic is not germane to POV. You're correct that WP:SELFCITE would be an issue, which is exactly why I suggested that you or someone else were free to borrow/quote criticism from my FAQ, since that would then be a reference from someone other than the author. You might consider that I have contributed to the Wikipedia article about DVD, and I have written four books and the online FAQ about DVD, which are referenced by the Wikipedia article, but no one seems concerned that my contributions are suspect or a "shill" for anyone because of my long involvement with the companies that created the DVD format. JimTheFrog (talk) 04:35, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I thought about what you wrote in the UV article talk page, and considering you're not exactly a PR organiser, but an intimate developer in the system (also, its related systems, and probably any future (and therefore better and more refined) system that comes from the same sources), there is less reason to deny your contributions regarding the subject. Wikipedia, if I recall correctly, encourages experts in their field to contribute. --BurritoBazooka (talk) 20:56, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
 * btw, http://dvddemystified.com looks parked. --BurritoBazooka (talk) 21:01, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the note about dvddemystified.com. I went to the URL and it said it was parked (which is bizarre, since it has been up and running for 16 years!). Then I went to GoDaddy and checked DNS info, which was correct. Then I went to dvddemystified.com again and the site showed up. I guess just opening up my GoDaddy account fixed some bug on their side. JimTheFrog (talk) 02:49, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

title: User talk:JimTheFrog


text:
User talk:Scandarkly

Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Naming conventions or how to format them visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Help or add a question to the Village pump. Cheers! --maveric149

title: User talk:Scandarkly


text:
User talk:Kmehta

Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Naming conventions or how to format them visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Help or add a question to the Village pump. Cheers! --maveric149

Unverified images
Hi! Thanks for uploading the following image:

 * Image:JCBOSE.jpg

I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use if you release it under the GNU Free Documentation License,  if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know where you got the imagesand I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much. [[User:Poccil|Peter O. (Talk, automation script)]] 01:28, Dec 10, 2004 (UTC)

P.S. You can help tag other images at User:Yann/Untagged_Images. Thanks again.

Unspecified source for Image:JCBOSE.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:JCBOSE.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:55, 5 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nicke L 01:55, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

title: User talk:Kmehta


text:
Sadleirian Professor of Pure Mathematics

The Sadleirian Professorship of Pure Mathematics, originally spelled in the statutes and for the first two professors as Sadlerian, is a professorship in pure mathematics within the DPMMS at the University of Cambridge. It was founded on a bequest from Lady Mary Sadleir for lectureships "for the full and clear explication and teaching that part of mathematical knowledge commonly called algebra". She died in 1706 and lectures began in 1710 but eventually these failed to attract undergraduates. In 1860 the foundation was used to establish the professorship. On 10 June 1863 Arthur Cayley was elected with the statutory duty "to explain and teach the principles of pure mathematics, and to apply himself to the advancement of that science." The stipend attached to the professorship was modest although it improved in the course of subsequent legislation.

List of Sadlerian Lecturers of Pure Mathematics

 * 1746–1769 William Ludlam
 * 1826–1835 Lawrence Stephenson

List of Sadleirian Lecturers of Pure Mathematics

 * 1845–1847 Arthur Scratchley
 * 1847–1857 George Ferns Reyner
 * 1851 Stephen Hanson
 * 1855–1858 William Charles Green
 * 1857–1864 John Robert Lunn

List of Sadleirian Professors of Pure Mathematics

 * 1863–1895 Arthur Cayley
 * 1895–1910 Andrew Russell Forsyth
 * 1910–1931 E. W. Hobson
 * 1931–1942 G. H. Hardy
 * 1945–1953 Louis Mordell
 * 1953–1967 Philip Hall
 * 1967–1986 J. W. S. Cassels
 * 1986–2012 John H. Coates
 * 2013–2014 Vladimir Markovic
 * 2017–2021 Emmanuel Breuillard
 * 2024– Oscar Randal-Williams


text:
User talk:Dkenney

Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Naming conventions or how to format them visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Help or add a question to the Village pump. Cheers! --maveric149

title: User talk:Dkenney


text:
User talk:Ph18

Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Naming conventions or how to format them visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Help or add a question to the Village pump. Cheers! --maveric149

title: User talk:Ph18


text:
User talk:Timonthemove

Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Naming conventions or how to format them visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Help or add a question to the Village pump. Cheers! --maveric149

title: User talk:Timonthemove


text:
User talk:Zola~enwiki

Two links on all of Wikipedia for a site I own that is a legit Big O fan site. There is a private dispute with the owner of paradigm-city.com and it seems that it's spilling out where it doesn't belong and someone just took away the link and claimed "spam". It's been there for more than a year--how is it suddenly "spam"?

Not sure of how to handle this, honestly--could definitely use guidance. spam would be adding my site to every big o related link you have, and I wouldn't do that, only put it in the two places it seemd pertinent as a legit outside link.

 * Big O oldid=4744384 has the original link addition. Second one added recently, again, it's pertinent as PCF isn't the only place Megadeus gets discussed. How should I best proceed?

Update: Megadeus has been resolved.

 * Hello, Steve Caruso here from the Association of Members' Advocates in response to your request for Advocacy. Looking over your talk page, I must ask if this issue been solved or do you still require the assistance of an Advocate? :-) אמר Steve Caruso  ( desk / AMA )  16:58, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Thank you Steve. the Megadeus page has been resolved, Ned Scott was very nice. So far the link on the Big O has remained, but given that there is the situation with the other site, my concern is that it keeps disappearing due to partisanship. What I would like advice on is the best way to handle it. Should I simply put it back and report again if it happens too many times? Should I comment about it or just ignore it and put it back? I figured it was wiser to get assistance from you folks before I did anything more because you know, the whole thing is a stupid Internet fight and it doesn't belong here!

Re: Google Directory
Hi

Yes I'm sorry, the information can be added. I was more concerned that it wasn't really that relevant for a summary, but considering the article has been merged into just the product listings. Feel free to put it back. Once again, sorry about that - only trying to do things for the better. Mambo Jambo 23:11, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Roger the Negotiator episode page
I have never even looked at the episode summary on your page before. I have plagiarised nothing. If you're going to make accusations, prove them. Given that both pages are summaries of the same information, there are bound to be similarities, but nothing was lifted. You think that you're the only one who can write a coherent summary of the episode, or own the exclusive rights to do so? The page has been reverted. I have no desire for conflict with you as we're both fans of The Big O, but please try to be more reasomnable.-CWD 13:52, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

 * Two editors have now looked at this and both have removed the article. Please don't copy from my site. Observe there are no complaints about the other synopses at all and won't be because people wrote their own articles. We have no corner on the synopsis market, anyone can write their own, but expanding on the original is still plagiarism.Zola 16:01, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

 * I don't give a damn what two people have done. They're both wrong.  I did not, repeat DID NOT copy from your page.  This is ridiculous.  They're both summaries of the same episode, scene by scene.  There's no way they're not going to be similar, but I can't find a single line that's the same aside from diologue quotes.  I did write my own summary and will continue to do so. -CWD 16:07, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Two Wikipedia editors, who have final say. Just rewrite it yourself in your own words and it's the end of the matter. That an editor did it means they went and checked out my original and agreed, you're being told by Wikipedia staff, not just some random person who happened to wander in off the street.

 * Only one of them seems to be an admin, from what I can tell. In any case, both removed your copyright violation box.  Looks to me like they're steering a neurtal course.  I wrote the article in my own words to begin with and I defy you to show proof that I did not.  I will not rewrite the article and make it worse just for the sake of making it look more different from your version.  This is you word against mine, and I guess we see what kind of fan you really are in that you'd rather have there be no page at all than so much as give my the benefit of the doubt. -CWD 16:43, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

You win
Upon further reflection, I've decided this isn't worth the time to me. So you win: There'll be no episode summary from me, nor will there be any others, though I had planned to eventually do the whole series. Maybe you'll take virtual pen in hand to make one? I doubt it. In fact, I won't edit any Big O-related pages. You can have them as your personal feifdom to prosper or rot for all I care, assuming nobody else has the patience to fight with you. I may not edit any wikipedia pages anymore at all. Editing anime pages on Wikipedia is something I do for enjoyment and to contribute to the fan community. There's no enjoyment in a futile struggle to make you see reason, and there's no point in trying to contribute when everything you work for can be wiped out by self-centered bullies in the blink of an eye and you get called a thief and a liar and you just have to take it.

In closing, I will reiterate once more that I copied NOTHING from your episode summary. I had never seen it before. Any similarities between the two can be attributed to the fact that they both cover the same material in the same fashion. We have both a set of eyes and a set of ears to recieve information and brains to process that information and if we're both asked to faithfully recount a certain set of information it's not surprising that we process it the same way. I already know there's no point in trying to convince you of that, though. No matter. I know the truth, my conscience is clear. I have that, and I gain nothing by wasting further time and effort on this struggle. Best of luck to you. -CWD 23:50, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

 * The reason they removed the copyright violation box was because the matter was handled by deleting the article because they went and looked and saw enough similarity to agree. I've already taken pen in hand, and all the episode synopses can be found at www.savebigo.com, the site you plagiarized from. I actually don't handle Big O at all here--my biggest contribution so far was to expand the "Roger Smith" stub way back in the day. I leave it to the folk who have the time to do a really good job of it, which describes just about all the Big O Content here.

 * If the best you can do is call me names, it doesn't make your assertion that you did nothing wrong very credible. But I agree, article is gone, case closed. Best of luck to you as well. Zola 02:27, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Don't worry, Zola. Maybe once we get all of the episode synopsi written, we can post them here ourselves..... ....JetBlack...

Your edit
My question is not spam and is far from irrelivant. Wikipedia IS biased. The question as to whether that bias is by design or by mistake remains relevant. --Filterbypass (talk) 23:41, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * @Zola: I gave my thoughts here. Johnuniq (talk) 01:34, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Personal question?
Sorry if this sounds weird, but: are you the same Zola who was a tracker and wrote those guides to Impulse Tracker and ModplugTracker for the compleat idiots? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.40.149.149 (talk) 02:01, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

yes, I amZola (talk) 02:07, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Ah, okay. I wanted to ask something, but I think it's better if I do it by email. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.40.149.149 (talk) 08:42, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

EDIT: Nevermind, I tried to use the contact form but it seems to glitch out. Here's the thing I wanted to ask: I'm considering doing a cover of one of your songs ("Be With Me"). Would you be okay with this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.40.149.149 (talk) 08:46, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

 * I would just want a little more info about who you are and what you're going to do with it--"Be With Me" is one of my originals. If the form doesn't work, use zola at zolaweb dot com to contact me.Zola (talk) 15:04, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

 * Actually, I abandoned the idea of covering it without even trying to think about what I was going to do with it. Sorry for the bother. - 9:42, 23 July 2012 (GMT+2)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Zola. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Zola~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 03:34, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 20:55, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Zola~enwiki


text:
User talk:EMH Rick 1

Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Naming conventions or how to format them visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Help or add a question to the Village pump. Cheers! --maveric149

title: User talk:EMH Rick 1


text:
User talk:CB~enwiki

Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Naming conventions or how to format them visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Help or add a question to the Village pump. Cheers! --maveric149

Unverified images
Hi! Thanks for uploading the following image:

 * Image:Dix2copytb.gif

I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use if you release it under the GNU Free Documentation License,  if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know at my talk page where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much. [[User:Poccil|Peter O. (Talk, automation script)]] 04:48, Dec 11, 2004 (UTC)

P.S. You can help tag other images at User:Yann/Untagged_Images. Thanks again.

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called CB. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name CB~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 22:50, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 11:19, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:CB~enwiki


text:
User talk:Bartosz

Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Naming conventions or how to format them visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Help or add a question to the Village pump. Cheers! --maveric149

Twin Paradox
Hi. Do you think you could look at my question that I listed at the bottom of the Twin Paradox discussion page? I would be very interested in your answer! Thanks. See: []

Wodan 21:51, Aug 28, 2004 (UTC)

Many-sorted logic, category theory
Dear Bartosz,

Thank You for Your letter. I used the term “sort” in the sense as it is used in the field of “many-sorted logic”. It was a surprise also for me, that there is no Wikipedia article from many-sorted logic yet. Many-sorted logic is also for me a fresh area. I try to learn it with searching keywords like “many-sorted logic”, “many-sorted”, I found till now such materials like Many-Sorted Logic, the first chapter in Lecture notes on Decision Procedures, written by Calogero G. Zarba.

Have much luck to learn category theory! I began it with Learning category theory can be even more funny if joined with categorical programming, see e.g. Charity programming language. But also Haskell (programming language) has many category theory related materials and oportunities.
 * Toposes, Triples and Theories written by Michael Barr and Charles Wells

Best wishes

Physis 20:47, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

New article: many-sorted logic
Thank You for Your letter, and also for the suggestion in the physics topic (the topic is not mine, just I saved it from deletion by copying it onto my user page. In childhood I wanted to be a physicist, it is a wonderful science).

To make Your efforts easier in learning many-sorted logic, I have just created such an article, but it is very embryonic. and contatin only new one reference that I have not mentioned yet to You (because I have found that book just now).

Much success and best wishes to You,

Physis 23:22, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Translation from English to Polish
Hi there. I like to ask for your support in translation. It might be a short recreative break from computing topics. :-) If you like please have a look at a short article about an international music award which should be available in several important languages like Polish as there already have been Polish participants. It's already published in English, French, and German. You wouldn't have to bother with the tablet and the references as I would prepare both for Polish. I just need the appropriate Polish terms (nationalities etc.) for it. Just let me know. Many thanks in advance. Best regards ArcCan (talk) 18:23, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:Code Co-op.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:01, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Bartosz


text:
User talk:Wavey

Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Naming conventions or how to format them visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Help or add a question to the Village pump. Cheers! --maveric149

title: User talk:Wavey


text:
User talk:Fruits~enwiki

Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Naming conventions or how to format them visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Help or add a question to the Village pump. Cheers! --maveric149

AfD nomination of ECONorthwest
An article that you have been involved in editing, ECONorthwest, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/ECONorthwest. Thank you. User A1 (talk) 13:03, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Fruits. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Fruits~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 00:03, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 13:03, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Fruits~enwiki


text:
User talk:Ramk

Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Naming conventions or how to format them visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Help or add a question to the Village pump. Cheers! --maveric149

title: User talk:Ramk


text:
User talk:Nan~enwiki

Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Naming conventions or how to format them visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Help or add a question to the Village pump. Cheers! --maveric149

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Nan. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Nan~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 01:43, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 16:48, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Nan~enwiki


text:
User talk:Kielhorn

Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Naming conventions or how to format them visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Help or add a question to the Village pump. Cheers! --maveric149

title: User talk:Kielhorn


text:
User talk:Dekaner

Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Naming conventions or how to format them visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Help or add a question to the Village pump. Cheers! --maveric149

title: User talk:Dekaner


text:
User talk:Icebookr

Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Naming conventions or how to format them visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Help or add a question to the Village pump. Cheers! --maveric149

title: User talk:Icebookr