text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 97.djvu/784

 97 STAT. 752 PUBLIC LAW 98-111 —OCT. 4, 1983 Claims against Cuban Government. 22 USC 1465e. Regulations. Appropriation authorization. Interference level analysis. Effective date. 22 USC 1465e note. 22 USC 1465f. FACILITY COMPENSATION SEC. 7. (a) It is the intent of the Congress that the Secretary of State should seek prompt and full settlement of United States claims against the Government of Cuba arising from Cuban interfer- ence with broadcasting in the United States. Pending the settlement of these claims, it is appropriate to provide some interim assistance to the United States broadcasters who are adversely affected by Cuban radio interference and who seek to assert their right to measures to counteract the effects of such interference. (b) Accordingly, the Agency may make payments to the United States radio broadcasting station licensees upon their application for expenses which they have incurred before, on, or after the date of this Act in mitigating, pursuant to special temporary authority from the Federal Communications Commission, the effects of activities by the Government of Cuba which directly interfere with the transmis- sion or reception of broadcasts by these licensees. Such expenses shall be limited to the costs of equipment (replaced less depreciation) and associated technical and engineering costs. (c) The Federal Communications Commission shall issue such regulations and establish such procedures for carrying out this section as the Federal Communications Commission finds appropri- ate. Such regulations shall be issued no later than one hundred and eighty days after enactment of this Act. (d) There are authorized to be appropriated to the Agency, $5,000,000 for usc in compensating United States radio broadcasting licensees pursuant to this section. Amounts appropriated under this section are authorized to be available until expended. (e) Funds appropriated for implementation of this section shall be available for a period of no more than four years following the initial broadcast occurring as a result of programs described in this Act. (f) It is the sense of the Congress that the President should establish a task force to analyze the level of interference from the operation of Cuban radio stations experienced by broadcasters in the United States and to seek a practical political and technical solution to this problem. (g) This section shall enter into effect on October 1, 1984. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS SEC. 8. (a) There are authorized to be appropriated for the United States Information Agency $14,000,000 for fiscal year 1984 and $11,000,000 for fiscal year 1985 to carry out sections 3 and 4 of this Act. The amount obligated by the United States Information Agency in ensuing fiscal years shall be sufficient to maintain broadcasts to Cuba under this Act at rates no less than the fiscal year 1985 level. (b) In addition to amounts otherwise authorized to be appropriated to the Agency for the fiscal years 1984 and 1985, there are author- ized to be appropriated to the Agency $54,800,000 for the fiscal year 1984 and $54,800,000 for the fiscal year 1985, which amounts shall be available only for expenses incurred by essential modernization of the facilities and operations of the Voice of America. (c) Amounts appropriated under this section are authorized to be made available until expended.

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 97.djvu/785

 PUBLIC LAW 98-111—OCT. 4, 1983 97 STAT. 753 INDEPENDENT EVALUATION OF THE CUBA SERVICE SEC. 9. The United States Information Agency shall arrange, by 22 USC I465g. contract if necessary, an independent evaluation of Cuba Service programing, the results of which are to be set forth in a report to be prepared and transmitted to the Agency eighteen months after the date of enactment of this Act and at intervals of one year thereafter for the following three years. The Agency shall, not later than thirty Report to days after the date of receipt of such report, transmit to the Con- Congress. gross such report, together with any recommendations for legisla- tive action. Approved October 4, 1983. LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 602 (H.R. 2453): HOUSE REPORT No. 98 -284, Pt. 1 (Coram, on Foreign Affairs) and Pt. 2 (Comm. on Energy and Commerce) both accompanying H.R. 2453. SENATE REPORT No. 98 -156 (Coram, on Foreign Relations). CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 129 (1983): Sept. 13, considered and passed Senate. Sept. 29, considered and passed House.

�

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 97.djvu/786

 97 STAT. 754 PUBLIC LAW 98-112 —OCT. 4, 1983 Oct. 4, 1983 (S.J. Res. 142] National Productivity Improvement Week. Public Law 98-112 98th Congress Joint Resolution Designating the week of October 3 through October 9, 1983, as "National Productivity Improvement Week". Whereas the economic stability and growth of this Nation relies largely on the collective industry and endeavor of its working citizens; Whereas the time-honored tradition of American leadership in work-related ingenuity and know-how has brought about great strides in productivity; Whereas growth in productivity in turn improves the standard of living of United States citizens; Whereas public awareness of the economic importance of productiv- ity will promote individual and collective ideas and innovations for productivity improvements; and Whereas a conscientious effort to improve productivity will foster a better standard of living for all citizens and reduce the level of inflation: Now, therefore, be it Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled. That, for the purposes of providing for a better understanding of the need for productivity growth and of encouraging the development of methods to improve individual and collective productivity in the public and private sectors, the week of October 3 through October 9, 1983, is designated "National Productivity Improvement Week". The President is re- quested to issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the United States to observe such week with appropriate ceremonies and activities. Approved October 4, 1983. LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S.J. Res. 142: CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 129 (1983): Sept. 20, considered and passed Senate. Sept. 30, considered and passed House.

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 97.djvu/787

 PUBLIC LAW 98-113—OCT. 5, 1983 97 STAT. 755 Public Law 98-113 98th Congress Joint Resolution To provide for the designation of the week of October 2 through October 8, 1983, ais Myasthenia Gravis Awareness Week". Whereas the incidence and prevalence of myasthenia gravis present a significant health problem in the United States; Whereas myasthenia gravis is a severe neuromuscular disorder, characterized by weakness of the voluntary muscles of the body; Whereas an estimated one hundred thousand to two hundred thou- sand diagnosed, and over one hundred thousand undiagnosed, Americans of both sexes, and all races and ages, are afflicted with the disease; Whereas the Nation faces a continuing need to support innovative research into the causes, treatment, and cure of myasthenia gravis; and Whereas it is appropriate to focus the Nation's attention upon the problem of myasthenia gravis: Now, therefore, be it Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the week of October 2 through October 8, 1983, is designated as "Myasthenia Gravis Awareness Week" and the President of the United States is author- ized and requested to issue a proclamation calling upon all govern- ment agencies and the people of the United States to observe the week with appropriate programs, ceremonies, and activities. Approved October 5, 1983. Oct. 5, 1983 [S.J. Res. 140] Myasthenia Gravis Awareness Week. LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S.J. Res. 140: CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 129 (1983): Sept. 20, considered and passed Senate. Sept. 30, considered and passed House.

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 97.djvu/788

 97 STAT. 756 PUBLIC LAW 98-114—OCT. 7, 1983 Public Law 98-114 98th Congress Joint Resolution Oct 7 1983 Authorizing and requesting the President to issue a proclamation designating the ' period from October 2, 1983, through October 8, 1983, as "National Schoolbus [H.J. Res. 137] g^fety Week of 1983". Whereas twenty-two million students are transported by schoolbus to and from school each day; Whereas the safety of these students deserves the highest priority; and Whereas a national program is underway to call public attention to the importance of scttoolbus safety during the week of October 2, 1983, through October 8, 1983: Now, therefore, be it Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United National States of America in Congress assembled, That the President is Week on983^^*^ authorized and requested to issue a proclamation designating the period from October 2, 1983, through October 9, 1983, as "National Schoolbus Safety Week of 1983" and calling upon the people of the United States and interested groups and organizations to observe such week with appropriate activities and ceremonies. Approved October 7, 1983. LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.J. Res. 137 (S.J. Res. 172): CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 129 (1983): Sept. 27, considered and passed House. Sept. 30, considered and passed Senate.

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 97.djvu/789

 PUBLIC LAW 98-115—OCT. 11, 1983 97 STAT. 757 Public Law 98-115 98th Congress An Act To authorize certain construction at military installations for fiscal year 1984, and for Oct. 11, 1983 other purposes. [H.R. 2972] Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled. That this Act may Military be cited as the "Military Construction Authorization Act, 1984'\ Au'thorizSn Act, 1984. TITLE I—ARMY AUTHORIZED ARMY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS SEC. 101. The Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and may carry out military construction projects in the amounts shown for each of the following installations and locations: INSIDE THE UNITED STATES UNITED STATES ARMY FORCES COMMAND Fort Bragg, North Carolina, $31,100,000. Fort Campbell, Kentucky, $15,300,000. Fort Carson, Colorado, $17,760,000. Fort Devens, Massachusetts, $3,000,000. Fort Douglas, Utah, $910,000. Fort Drum, New York, $1,500,000. Fort Hood, Texas, $76,050,000. Fort Hunter Liggett, California, $1,000,000. Fort Irwin, California, $34,850,000. Fort Lewis, Washington, $35,310,000. Fort Meade, Maryland, $5,150,000. Fort Ord, California, $6,150,000. Fort Polk, Louisiana, $16,180,000. Fort Richardson, Alaska, $940,000. Fort Riley, Kansas, $76,600,000. Fort Stewart, Georgia, $29,720,000. Presidio of Monterey, California, $1,300,000. UNITED STATES ARMY WESTERN COMMAND Schofield Barracks, Hawaii, $31,900,000. UNITED STATES ARMY TRAINING AND DOCTRINE COMMAND Carlisle Barracks, Pennsylvania, $1,500,000. Fort Benjamin Harrison, Indiana, $5,900,000. Fort Benning, Georgia, $21,750,000. Fort Bliss, Texas, $40,580,000. Fort Jackson, South Carolina, $39,190,000. Fort Knox, Kentucky, $4,200,000.

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 97.djvu/790

 97 STAT. 758 PUBLIC LAW 98-115—OCT. 11, 1983 Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, $13,550,000. Fort Lee, Virginia, $5,930,000. Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri, $12,600,000. Fort McClellan, Alabama, $4,220,000. Fort Rucker, Alabama, $11,600,000. Fort Sill, Oklahoma, $25,150,000. Fort Story, Virginia, $9,000,000. MILITARY DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON Fort Myer, Virginia, $2,750,000. UNITED STATES ARMY MATERIEL DEVELOPMENT AND READINESS COMMAND Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, $39,850,000. Detroit Arsenal, Michigan, $270,000. Fort Monmouth, New Jersey, $14,900,000. Harry Diamond Laboratories, Maryland, $400,000. Kansas Army Ammunition Plant, Kansas, $1,150,000. Louisiana Army Ammunition Plant, Louisiana, $4,250,000. Milan Army Ammunition Plant, Tennessee, $550,000. Picatinny Arsenal, New Jersey, $460,000. Pine Bluff Arsenal, Arkansas, $10,200,000. Red River Army Depot, Texas, $1,250,000. Redstone Arsenal, Alabama, $25,400,000. Rock Island Arsenal, Illinois, $26,500,000. Sierra Army Depot, California, $3,950,000. Tobyhanna Army Depot, Pennsylvania, $9,200,000. Watervliet Arsenal, New York, $2,150,000. White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico, $310,000. AMMUNITION FACILITIES Iowa Army Ammunition Plant, Iowa, $2,000,000. Lake City Army Ammunition Plant, Missouri, $600,000. Lone Star Army Ammunition Plant, Texas, $1,300,000. Longhorn Army Ammunition Plant, Texas, $270,000. Milan Army Ammunition Plant, Tennessee, $340,000. Radford Army Ammunition Plant, Virginia, $4,620,000. Scranton Army Ammunition Plant, Pennsylvania, $1,000,000. UNITED STATES ARMY COMMUNICATIONS COMMAND Fort Huachuca, Arizona, $2,750,000. UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY United States Military Academy, New York, $12,840,000. UNITED STATES ARMY HEALTH SERVICES COMMAND Fort Detrick, Maryland, $1,650,000. Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, District of Co- lumbia, $4,200,000.

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 97.djvu/791

 PUBLIC LAW 98-115—OCT. 11, 1983 97 STAT. 759 CLASSIFIED PROJECT Various Locations, $1,300,000. OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES UNITED STATES ARMY, JAPAN Okinawa, $1,400,000. EIGHTH UNITED STATES ARMY Korea, $59,580,000. BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEMS COMMAND Kwajalein, $5,620,000. UNITED STATES ARMY FORCES COMMAND OVERSEAS Fort Buchanan, Puerto Rico, $1,550,000. Panama, $1,460,000. UNITED STATES ARMY, EUROPE Europe, $19,000,000. Germany, $286,010,000. Greece, $4,880,000. Italy, $2,710,000. Turkey, $5,250,000. UNITED STATES ARMY INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMAND OVERSEAS Korea, $260,000. FAMILY HOUSING SEC 102. (a) The Secretary of the Army may construct family housing units (including land acquisition) and may acquire manufac- tured home facilities at the following installations in the number of units shown, and in the amount shown, for each installation: Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, one hundred and six units, $6,816,000. Various Locations, Alaska, six units, $1,158,000. Aliamanu, Hawaii, community center, $9,900,000. Various Locations, North Atlantic Treaty Organization nations in Europe, five hundred units, $40,000,000. Fort Greely, Alaska, thirty-eight units, $5,203,000. Fort Polk, Louisiana, two hundred units, $15,342,000. Fort Stewart, Georgia, two hundred and forty-four units, $14,626,000. Wildflecken, Federal Republic of Germany, one hundred and fifty-three units, $12,157,000. Bayreuth, Federal Republic of Germany, thirteen units, $1,132,000. Kitzingen, Federal Republic of Germany, one hundred and three units, $11,140,000.

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 97.djvu/792

 97 STAT. 760 PUBLIC LAW 98-115—OCT. 11, 1983 Vicenza, Italy, two units, $354,000. (b) The Secretary of the Army may rehabilitate existing family housing units at Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, or may construct new family housing units at such installation, whichever the Secretary determines is most cost effective, and may usc for such purpose (1) any funds not in excess of $6,080,000 that were appropriated for fiscal year 1983 for the improvement of existing family housing at such installation and which remain unobligated on the date of the enactment of this Act, and (2) any funds appropri- ated pursuant to subsection (a) for the construction or acquisition of family housing at such installation. CONTRACTING FOR CERTAIN PROJECTS SEC. 103. (a) The following projects authorized in sections 101 and 102 may be carried out only as provided in subsection (b): Operations Building in the amount of $2,000,000 at Fort Carson, Colorado. Child Care Center in the amount of $3,000,000 at Fort Devens, Bulk Fuel Storage Facility in the amount of $4,200,000 at Fort Hood, Texas. Multipurpose Training Range in the amount of $3,350,000 at Fort Hood, Texas. Physical Fitness Training Center in the amount of $1,000,000 at Fort Hunter Liggett, California. Barracks Modernization in the amount of $7,700,000 at Fort Irwin, California. Hangar Addition in the amount of $2,800,000 at Fort Lewis, Washington. Instrument Landing System in the amount of $870,000 at Fort Lewis, Washington. Electrical Substation in the amount of $1,400,000 at Fort Riley, Kansas. Sewage Treatment and Water Upgrade in the amount of $6,500,000 at Fort Riley, Kansas. Physical Fitness Training Center with Pool in the amount of $1,500,000 at Carlisle Barracks, Pennsylvania. Barracks in the amount of $5,900,000 at Fort Benjamin Harri- son, Indiana. Infantry Remote Target Systems Ranges in the amount of $3,000,000 at Fort Bliss, Texas. Physical Fitness Training Center in the amount of $2,850,000 at Fort Bliss Texas Chapel/Child Care Center in the amount of $6,400,000 at Fort Jackson, South Carolina. Education Center in the amount of $5,200,000 at Fort Jack- son, South Carolina. Trainee Barracks in the amount of $26,800,000 at Fort Jack- son, South Carolina. Classrooms in the amount of $1,950,000 at Fort Rucker, Alabama. Trainee Barracks with Dining Facility in the amount of $23,000,000 at Fort Sill, Oklahoma. Trainee Barracks in the amount of $9,800,000 at Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland.

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 97.djvu/793

 PUBLIC LAW 98-115—OCT. 11, 1983 97 STAT. 761 Medical Research Laboratory Alterations in the amount of $3,650,000 at Aberdeen Proving Grounds, Maryland. Electrical Distribution System in the amount of $2,500,000 at Fort Monmouth, New Jersey. Pulse Power Center in the amount of $12,400,000 at Fort Monmouth, New Jersey. Bridge Repair in the amount of $4,500,000 at Rock Island A.rsGTi3.1 Illinois Shelter Handling Facility in the amount of $9,200,000 at Tobyhanna Army Depot, Pennsylvania. Laboratory in the amount of $2,150,000 at Watervliet Arse- nal, New York. Brigade Headquarters in the amount of $1,500,000 at Fort Huachuca, Arizona. Construction of Family Housing in the amount of $40,000,000 at various locations, North Atlantic Treaty Organization na- tions in Europe. (b) A contract for a project listed in subsection (a) may be entered Obligated funds. into only if the funds to be obligated for the contract are derived from the total amount of funds (if any) available from (1) the net savings from the execution of the projects authorized by sections 101 and 102 other than those listed in subsection (a), (2) total savings from cancellations of such projects, and (3) other sources, including savings from projects authorized for the Army in previous Military Construction Authorization Acts. (c) Before the Secretary of the Army may advertise for bids, or may negotiate, for a contract described in subsection (b), the Secre- tary shall submit a written report to the appropriate committees of Congress certifying that funds for the contract are available in accordance with subsection (b) and identifying the source of the funds. Such a report may not be submitted before January 1, 1984. Report to congressional committees. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING UNITS SEC. 104. Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of the Army may make expenditures to improve existing military family housing units in an amount not to exceed $103,553,000, of which $26,623,000 is available only for energy con- servation projects. ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES AND CONSTRUCTION DESIGN FOR FAMILY HOUSING PROJECTS SEC 105. Subject to section 2807 of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of the Army may carry out architectural and engi- neering services and construction design in connection with military family housing projects (including improvements) in the amount of $6,750,000. PROJECTS USING UNOBLIGATED PRIOR YEAR AUTHORITY SEC. 106. (a) The Secretary of the Army may carry out the following projects (for which funds are not authorized under section 601) as provided in subsection (b): Unspecified minor construction projects in the amount of $4,600,000 at various locations. Post, p. 777.

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 97.djvu/794

 97 STAT. 762 PUBLIC LAW 98-115—OCT. 11, 1983 Construction projects of $1,000,000 or less in the amount of $6,800,000 at various locations. (b) A contract for a project described in subsection (a) may be entered into using authorization amounts available from approved projects authorized under title I of any previous Military Construc- 96 Stat. 1549. tion Authorization Act. TITLE II—NAVY AUTHORIZED NAVY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS SEC. 201. The Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and may carry out military construction projects in the amounts shown for each of the following installations and locations: INSIDE THE UNITED STATES UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS Marine Corps Air Station, Beaufort, South Carolina, $3,530,000. Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, $31,760,000. Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton, California, $39,070,000. Marine Corps Air Station, Cherry Point, North Carolina, $1,805,000. Marine Corps Air Station, El Toro, California, $14,030,000. Marine Corps Air Station, Kaneohe Bay, Hawaii, $7,900,000. Marine Corps Air Station, New River, North Carolina, $2,730,000. Marine Corps Camp Detachment, Camp Elmore, Norfolk, Vir- ginia, $1,160,000. Camp H. M. Smith, Oahu, Hawaii, $2,700,000. Marine Corps Development and Education Command, Quantico, Virginia, $2,570,000. Marine Corps Recruit Depot, San Diego, California, $10,690,000. Marine Corps Air Station, Tustin, California, $465,000. Marine Corps Air-Ground Combat Center, Twentynine Palms, California, $25,120,000. Marine Corps Air Station, Yuma, Arizona, $8,920,000. CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS Naval Academy, Annapolis, Maryland, $9,720,000. Naval Station, Annapolis, Maryland, $405,000. Naval Space Surveillance Field Station, HoUandale, Mississippi, $495,000. COMMANDER IN CHIEF, UNITED STATES ATLANTIC FLEET Naval Air Station, Brunswick, Maine, $7,800,000. Naval Air Station, Cecil Field, Florida, $17,670,000. Naval Station, Charleston, South Carolina, $43,150,000. Naval Air Station, Jacksonville, Florida, $10,000,000. Naval Air Station, Key West, Florida, $15,635,000. Naval Amphibious Base, Little Creek, Virginia, $9,170,000. Naval Station, Mayport, Florida, $25,520,000. Naval Submarine Base, New London, Connecticut, $8,200,000. Naval Station, Norfolk, Virginia, $2,560,000. Naval Air Station, Oceana, Virginia, $4l5,000.

�


text:
Page:Second Geological Survey of Pennsylvania Report of Progress PPP.djvu/22

 short and broad, flat and quadrangular on the ventral side; triangular and carinated on the dorsal side, and produced into a long, slender spine, having a length about equal to twice that of the posterior segment of the abdomen. To the ventral side of the caudal plate are articulated two movable spines, about equal in length to the spiniform extension of the telson. These spines are grooved along their lateral margins, and marked by a carina on their dorsal face.

Test thin, somewhat thickened on the margins and dorsal line of the carapace, and at the articulations of the abdominal segments; ornamented over the entire surface of the carapace, mandibles, abdomen, and tail with minute granules or pustules, which give a punctate appearance to the whole.

The specimen represented in Fig. 13 of Plate I has a length, exclusive of the tail spines, of 57 m m. The carapace measures 30 m m. in length, 20 m m. in breadth, and 18 m m. along the hinge-line. The segments of the abdomen, beginning with the anterior one, measure respectively 3.5, 3.7. 4, 4, 5, and 8.5 m m. in length,—showing that the posterior segment is more than twice the length of any of the first four segments. The three posterior ones, commencing with the distal segment, have diameters of 5.5, 7, and 8 m m. respectively. The left valve of this species figured in the 16th Rept. N. Y. State Cab. Nat. Hist. has a greatest length of 55 m m., with a breadth of 37 m m. The three abdominal segments figured in the same publication also belonged to a much larger individual than any noted in the present description.

This species differs from E. sublenis,, (Am. Jour. Sci., Vol. XIX, p. 36,) in the more numerous nodes and tubercles of the carapace, the curvature and direction of the ridge along the thoracic portion, and in its more elongated abdominal segments. The same characters serve to distinguish it from E. pustulosa,, (loc. cit.,) with the addition of a marked difference in the surface ornamentation, which in that species is distinctly pustulose. It is readily distinguished from E. socialis, in its larger


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 97.djvu/795

 PUBLIC LAW 98-115—OCT. 11, 1983 97 STAT. 763 Tactical Training Group, Atlantic, Virginia Beach, Virginia, $3,750,000. COMMANDER IN CHIEF, UNITED STATES PACIFIC FLEET Naval station, Adak, Alaska, $2,970,000. Naval Submarine Base, Bangor, Washington, $8,040,000. Naval Air Station, Barbers Point, Hawaii, $890,000. Naval Amphibious Base, Coronado, California, $21,222,000. Naval Air Station, Fallon, Nevada, $11,900,000. Naval Air Station, Lemoore, California, $20,920,000. Naval Air Station, Miramar, California, $2,020,000. Naval Air Station, Moffett Field, California, $1,870,000. Naval Air Station, North Island, California, $20,650,000. Fleet Intelligence Center, Pacific, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, $990,000. Naval Station, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, $3,350,000. Naval Submarine Base, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, $2,590,000. Tactical Training Group, Pacific, San Diego, California, $3,260,000. Naval Station, San Diego, California, $980,000. Naval Submarine Base, San Diego, California, $6,660,000. Naval Station, Mare Island, Vallejo, California, $2,010,000 Naval Air Station, Whidbey Island, Washington, $3,160,000. NAVAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING COMMAND Naval Air Station, Chase Field, Texas, $2,625,000. Naval Air Station, Corpus Christi, Texas, $495,000. Fleet Combat Training Center, Atlantic, Dam Neck, Virginia, $12,190,000. Fleet Intelligence Training Center, Dam Neck, Virginia, $12,200,000. Naval Guided Missiles School, Dam Neck, Virginia, $1,860,000. Naval Air Station, Kingsville, Texas, $4,830,000. Naval Air Station, Memphis, Tennessee, $11,800,000. Naval Air Station, Meridian, Mississippi, $610,000. Naval Education and Training Center, Newport, Rhode Island, $1,110,000. Fleet Anti-Submarine Warfare Training Center, Atlantic, Nor- folk, Virginia, $4,130,000. Fleet Training Center, Norfolk, Virginia, $1,120,000. Naval Training Center, Orlando, Florida, $19,690,000. Naval Air Station, Pensacola, Florida, $2,200,000. Naval Technical Training Center, Pensacola, Florida, $2,410,000. Fleet Anti-Submarine Warfare Training Center, Pacific, San Diego, California, $14,200,000. Fleet Training Center, San Diego, California, $10,000,000. Naval Air Station, Whiting Field, Florida, $4,260,000. BUREAU OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY National Naval Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, $37,170,000. Naval Regional Medical Center, Long Beach, California, $8 370 000 Naval Regional Medical Clinic, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, $8,490,000.

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 97.djvu/796

 97 STAT. 764 PUBLIC LAW 98-115—OCT. 11, 1983 NAVAL MATERIAL COMMAND Naval Air Rework Facility, Alameda, California, $21,560,000. David W. Taylor Naval Ship Research and Development Center, Bethesda, Maryland, $5,030,000. Naval Supply Center, Puget Sound, Bremerton, Washington, $200,000. Naval Ordnance Test Unit, Cape Canaveral, Florida, $57,000,000. Charleston Naval Shipyard, Charleston, South Carolina, $15,000,000. Naval Weapons Station, Charleston, South Carolina, $1,570,000. Naval Air Rework Facility, Cherry Point, North Carolina, $20,040,000. Naval Weapons Center, China Lake, California, $31,100,000. Naval Weapons Station, Concord, California, $2,720,000. Naval Surface Weapons Center, Dahlgren, Virginia, $5,355,000. Fleet Combat Direction Systems Support Activity, Dam Neck, Virginia, $4,000,000. Naval Weapons Station, Earle, New Jersey, $465,000. Naval Construction Battalion Center, Gulfport, Mississippi, $2,960,000. Naval Ordnance Station, Indian Head, Maryland, $1,950,000. Naval Air Rework Facility, Jacksonville, Florida, $2,875,000. Naval Underwater Engineering Station, Keyport, Washington, $1,400,000. Naval Submarine Base, Kings Bay, Georgia, $118,129,000, of which $6,019,000 may be used to provide community impact and planning assistance to the communities located near the submarine base. Naval Air Engineering Center, Lakehurst, New Jersey, $4,195,000. Mare Island Naval Shipyard, Vallejo, California, $14,800,000. Naval Air Rework Facility, Norfolk, Virginia, $3,020,000. Naval Supply Center, Norfolk, Virginia, $6,400,000. Naval Coastal Systems Center, Panama City, Florida, $6,070,000. Naval Air Test Center, Patuxent River, Maryland, $10,150,000. Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, $26,040,000. Navy Public Works Center, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, $13,100,000. Pacific Missile Test Center, Point Mugu, California, $840,000. Portsmouth Naval Shipyard, Kittery, Maine, $7,100,000. Norfolk Naval Shipyard, Portsmouth, Virginia, $19,350,000. Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, Bremerton, Washington, $7,300,000. Naval Transmitter Facility, Republic, Michigan, $13,000,000. Naval Ocean Systems Center, San Diego, California, $8,000,000. Naval Supply Center, San Diego, California, $1,110,000. Navy Public Works Center, San Francisco, California, $220,000. Naval Shipyard, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, $2,600,000. Naval Ships Systems Engineering Station, Philadelphia, Pennsyl- vania, $14,500,000. NAVAL OCEANOGRAPHY COMMAND Naval Oceanographic Office, Bay St. Louis, Mississippi, $6,320,000. Fleet Numerical Oceanography Center, Monterey, California, $6,980,000.

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 97.djvu/797

 PUBLIC LAW 98-115—OCT. 11, 1983 97 STAT. 765 NAVAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMAND Naval Communication Area Master Station, Atlantic, Norfolk, Virginia, $1,690,000. NAVAL SECURITY GROUP COMMAND Naval Security Group Detachment, Sugar Grove, West Virginia, $7,400,000. OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS Marine Corps Air Station, Iwakuni, Japan, $750,000. COMMANDER IN CHIEF, ATLANTIC FLEET Naval Air Station, Bermuda, $810,000. Naval Facility, Bermuda, $1,110,000. Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, $730,000. Naval Station, Keflavik, Iceland, $6,850,000. Naval Station, Roosevelt Roads, Puerto Rico, $1,300,000. Atlantic Fleet Weapons Training Facility, Roosevelt Roads, Puerto Rico, $1,945,000. COMMANDER IN CHIEF, PACIFIC FLEET Commander, U.S. Naval Forces Korea Detachment, Chinhae, Korea, $460,000. Navy Support Facility, Diego Garcia, $31,800,000. Naval Station, Subic Bay, Republic of the Philippines, $6,140,000. COMMANDER IN CHIEF, NAVAL FORCES, EUROPE Naval Support Activity, Holy Loch, Scotland, $8,840,000. Navy Personnel Support Activity, Naples, Italy, $640,000. Naval Support Activity, Naples, Italy, $4,700,000. Naval Station, Rota, Spain, $9,250,000. Naval Air Station, Sigonella, Italy, $20,810,000. NAVAL OCEANOGRAPHY COMMAND Naval Oceanography Command Center, Rota, Spain, $980,000. NAVAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMAND Naval Communication Station, Harold E. Holt, Exmouth, Austra- lia, $3,020,000. Naval Communication Area Master Station Western Pacific, Guam, Mariana Islands, $980,000. Classified Location, $1,280,000. NAVAL SECURITY GROUP COMMAND Naval Security Group Detachment, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, $1,700,000.

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 97.djvu/798

 97 STAT. 766 PUBLIC LAW 98-115—OCT. 11, 1983 HOST NATION INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT Various Locations, $2,970,000. CONTRACTING FOR CERTAIN PROJECTS SEC. 202. (a) The following projects authorized in section 201 may be carried out only as provided in subsection (b): Unaccompanied Enlisted Personnnel Housing in the amount of $10,000,000 at Naval Air Station, Jacksonville, Florida. Unaccompanied Enlisted Personnel Housing Modernization in the amount of $1,800,000 at Naval Station, Mare Island, Vallejo, California. Applied Instruction Building in the amount of $10,000,000 at the Fleet Training Center, San Diego, California. Unaccompanied Enlisted Personnel Housing in the amount of $7,300,000 at the Naval Shipyard, Puget Sound, Bremerton, Washington. Station Access Facilities in the amount of $1,400,000 at the Naval Underwater Engineering Station Keyport, Washington. TRIDENT Training Facility in the amount of $17,000,000 at the Naval Submarine Base, Kings Bay, Georgia. Training Facility in the amount of $4,600,000 at the Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. Service Shops in the amount of $4,000,000 at the Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. Electrical Distribution Lines in the amount of $7,200,000 at the Naval Shipyard, Mare Island, California. Facility Energy Improvements in the amount of $1,600,000 at the Naval Shipyard, Mare Island, California. Horizontal Paint and Blast Facility in the amount of $6,000,000 at the Naval Shipyard, Mare Island, California. Medical/Dental Clinic in the amount of $2,550,000 at the Naval Support Activity, Holy Loch, Scotland. General Warehouse in the amount of $2,800,000 at the Naval Support Activity, Holy Loch, Scotland. Supply Pier in the amount of $2,950,000 at the Naval Support Activity, Holy Loch, Scotland. Family Services Center in the amount of $540,000 at the Naval Support Activity, Holy Loch, Scotland. Armed Forces Radio and Television Station in the amount of $1,200,000 at the Naval Air Station, Sigonella, Italy. Obligated funds. (b) A contract for a project listed in subsection (a) may be entered into only if the funds to be obligated for the contract are derived from the total amount of funds (if any) available from (1) the net savings from the execution of the projects authorized by section 201 other than those listed in subsection (a), (2) total savings from cancellations of such projects, and (3) other sources, including sav- ings from projects authorized for the Navy in previous Military Construction Authorization Acts. Trident Training (c)(1) During fiscal year 1984, the Secretary of the Navy may enter Kr^^^'/'^ f A i^to ^ contract for the total amount authorized under section 201 for Obligated tunas. ^^^ construction of the Trident Training Facility at the Naval Submarine Base, Kings Bay, Georgia, but may not obligate more than $17,000,000 of any funds described in subsection (b). Any amount for the construction of such facility in excess of $17,000,000 may be obligated only after fiscal year 1984 from funds realized

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 97.djvu/799

 PUBLIC LAW 98-115—OCT. 11, 1983 97 STAT. 767 from savings on other projects or to the extent provided for in appropriation Acts. (2) During fiscal year 1984, the Secretary of the Navy may enter into a contract for the total amount authorized under section 201 for the construction of the Service Shops at Pearl Harbor Naval Ship- yard, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, but may not obligate more than $4,000,000 of any funds described in subsection (b). Any amount for the construction of such facility in excess of $4,000,000 may be obligated only after fiscal year 1984 from funds realized from sav- ings on other projects or to the extent provided for in appropriation Acts. (d) Before the Secretary of the Navy may advertise for bids, or Report to may negotiate, for a contract described in subsection (b), the Secre- confmlttees tary shall submit a written report to the appropriate committees of Congress certifying that funds for the contract are available in accordance with subsection (b) and identifying the source of the funds. Such a report may not be submitted before January 1, 1984. FAMILY HOUSING SEC. 203. The Secretary of the Navy may construct family housing units (including land acquisition) and may acquire manufactured home facilities at the following installations in the number of units shown, and in the amount shown, for each installation: Marine Corps Air Station, El Toro, California, one hundred and thirty units, $11,666,000. Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton, California, three hun- dred units, $23,160,000. Navy Public Works Center, Subic Bay, Republic of the Philip- pines, three hundred units, $29,300,000. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING UNITS SEC. 204. Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of the Navy may make expenditures to improve existing military family housing units in an amount not to exceed $13,240,000, of which $3,953,000 is available only for energy conser- vation projects. ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES AND CONSTRUCTION DESIGN FOR FAMILY HOUSING PROJECTS SEC. 205. Subject to section 2807 of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of the Navy may carry out architectural and engineer- ing services and construction design in connection with military family housing projects (including improvements) in the amount of $7,395,000. MODIFICATION OF LEASING LIMITATION FOR NAVAL AIR STATION, LEMOORE, CALIFORNIA SEC. 206. Section 2 of Public Law 92-378 (86 Stat. 530), relating to leases of lands for agricultural and grazing purposes at the Naval Air Station, Lemoore, California, is amended by striking out "160 irrigable acres" and inserting in lieu thereof "960 irrigable acres".

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 97.djvu/800

 97 STAT. 768 PUBLIC LAW 98-115—OCT. 11, 1983 MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY FOR PROCUREMENT OF STEAM SUPPLY FOR THE CHARLESTON NAVAL STATION SEC. 207. Clause (1) of section 205(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act, 1982 (Public Law 97-99; 95 Stat. 1366), is amended to read as follows: "(1) construct steam lines and any other needed facility, or pay a connection fee, to make use of energy generated by a waste heat recovery facility or a process-related, coal-fired co- generation facility to be furnished by the Macalloy Corporation (a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Dela- ware) or a successor in interest to that corporation; and". TITLE III—AIR FORCE AUTHORIZED AIR FORCE CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS SEC. 301. The Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real prop- erty and may carry out military construction projects in the amounts shown for each of the following installations and locations: INSIDE THE UNITED STATES AIR FORCE LOGISTICS COMMAND Hill Air Force Base, Utah, $16,155,000. Kelly Air Force Base, Texas, $22,590,000. McClellan Air Force Base, California, $10,200,000. Newark Air Force Station, Ohio, $800,000. Robins Air Force Base, Georgia, $18,780,000. Tinker Air Force Base, Oklahoma, $12,560,000. Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, $5,923,000. AIR FORCE SYSTEMS COMMAND Arnold Engineering Development Center, Tennessee, $12,552,000. Brooks Air Force Base, Texas, $10,110,000. Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, Florida, $9,400,000. Eastern Launch Site, Florida, $6,000,000. Edwards Air Force Base, California, $12,400,000. Eglin Air Force Base, Florida, $11,990,000. Laurence G. Hanscom Air Force Base, Massachusetts, $3,670,000. Johnson Space Center, Texas, $700,000. Los Angeles Air Force Station, California, $2,670,000. Patrick Air Force Base, Florida, $2,392,000. AIR NATIONAL GUARD Buckley Air National Guard Base, Colorado, $2,000,000. AIR TRAINING COMMAND Chanute Air Force Base, Illinois, $89,210,000. Columbus Air Force Base, Mississippi, $2,180,000. Goodfellow Air Force Base, Texas, $10,040,000. Gunter Air Force Station, Alabama, $6,750,000. Keesler Air Force Base, Mississippi, $24,620,000.

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 97.djvu/801

 PUBLIC LAW 98-115—OCT. 11, 1983 97 STAT. 769 Lackland Air Force Base, Texas, $10,700,000, Lowry Air Force Base, Colorado, $6,100,000. Mather Air Force Base, California, $4,460,000. Reese Air Force Base, Texas, $1,550,000. San Antonio Area, Texas, $12,000,000. Sheppard Air Force Base, Texas, $16,080,000. Vance Air Force Base, Oklahoma, $1,250,000. Williams Air Force Base, Arizona, $2,700,000. ALASKAN AIR COMMAND Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska, $58,390,000. Elmendorf Air Force Base, Alaska, $10,770,000. Galena Airport, Alaska, $13,350,000. Shemya Air Force Base, Alaska, $45,600,000. MILITARY AIRUFT COMMAND Altus Air Force Base, Oklahoma, $21,600,000. Andrews Air Force Base, Maryland, $1,786,000. Boiling Air Force Base, Washington, D.C., $2,300,000. Charleston Air Force Base, South Carolina, $3,200,000. Dover Air Force Base, Delaware, $1,300,000. Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico, $2,240,000. Little Rock Air Force Base, Arkansas, $3,120,000. McChord Air Force Base, Washmgton, $12,160,000. McGuire Air Force Base, New Jersey, $620,000. Pope Air Force Base, North Carolina, $6,500,000. Scott Air Force Base, Illinois, $790,000. Travis Air Force Base, California, $6,200,000. PACIFIC AIR FORCES Hickam Air Force Base, Hawaii, $3,150,000. PEACEKEEPER CONSTRUCTION Various Locations, $46,700,000. SPACE COMMAND NORAD Cheyenne Mountain Complex, Colorado, $5,660,000. Peterson Air Force Base, Colorado, $78,700,000. SPECIAL PROJECT Various Locations, $24,000,000. STRATEGIC AIR COMMAND Barksdale Air Force Base, Louisiana, $34,970,000. Beale Air Force Base, California, $5,550,000. Blytheville Air Force Base, Arkansas, $6,950,000. Carswell Air Force Base, Texas, $4,110,000. Castle Air Force Base, California, $6,500,000. Dyess Air Force Base, Texas, $14,300,000. Ellsworth Air Force Base, South Dakota, $6,700,000. Fairchild Air Force Base, Washington, $28,450,000. 11-194O-85—26:QL3

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 97.djvu/802

 97 STAT. 770 PUBLIC LAW 98-115—OCT. 11, 1983 Forsyth Air Force Station, Montana, $4,225,000. Grand Forks Air Force Base, North Dakota, $8,525,000. Griffiss Air Force Base, New York, $12,400,000. Grissom Air Force Base, Indiana, $9,830,000. Havre Air Force Station, Montana, $4,936,000. K. I. Sawyer Air Force Base, Michigan, $40,460,000. Loring Air Force Base, Maine, $36,400,000. Malmstrom Air Force Base, Montana, $630,000. March Air Force Base, California, $3,550,000. McConnell Air Force Base, Kansas, $9,570,000. Minot Air Force Base, North Dakota, $13,800,000. Offutt Air Force Base, Nebraska, $38,520,000. Pease Air Force Base, New Hampshire, $7,200,000. Pittsburgh Air Force Base, New York, $5,955,000. Vandenberg Air Force Base, California, $46,002,000. Whiteman Air Force Base, Missouri, $24,500,000. Wurtsmith Air Force Base, Michigan, $5,000,000. TACTICAL AIR COMMAND Bangor International Airport, Maine, $10,100,000. Bergstrom Air Force Base, Texas, $20,310,000. Cannon Air Force Base, New Mexico, $6,800,000. Davis-Monthan Air Force Base, Arizona, $5,850,000. England Air Force Base, Louisiana, $3,357,000. George Air Force Base, California, $220,000. Holloman Air Force Base, New Mexico, $20,500,000. Homestead Air Force Base, Florida, $4,060,000. Langley Air Force Base, Virginia, $8,300,000. Luke Air Force Base, Arizona, $9,663,000. MacDill Air Force Base, Florida, $6,360,000. Moody Air Force Base, Georgia, $1,300,000. Mountain Home Air Force Base, Idaho, $6,590,000. Myrtle Beach Air Force Base, South Carolina, $1,550,000. Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada, $4,490,000. Seymour-Johnson Air Force Base, North Carolina, $5,240,000. Shaw Air Force Base, South Carolina, $9,990,000. Tyndall Air Force Base, Florida, $29,040,000. Unspecified Location, $500,000. UNITED STATES AIR FORCE ACADEMY United States Air Force Academy, Colorado, $10,085,000. OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES MILITARY AIRUFT COMMAND Lajes Field, Portugal, $1,400,000. Rhein-Main Air Base, Germany, $1,870,000. PACIFIC AIR FORCES Clark Air Base, Republic of the Philippines, $8,850,000. Diego Garcia Air Base, Indian Ocean, $58,200,000. Kadena Air Base, Japan, $11,260,000. Korea, Various Locations, $5,900,000.

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 97.djvu/803

 PUBLIC LAW 98-115—OCT. 11, 1983 97 STAT. 771 Kunsan Air Base, Korea, $31,013,000. Kwang-Ju Air Base, Korea, $210,000. Misawa Air Base, Japan, $18,700,000. Osan Air Base, Korea, $42,150,000. Saechon Air Base, Korea, $210,000. Suwon Air Base, Korea, $400,000. Taegu Air Base, Korea, $2,750,000. Yokota Air Base, Japan, $1,250,000. STRATEGIC AIR COMMAND Andersen Air Force Base, Guam, $24,710,000. TACTICAL AIR COMMAND Howard Air Force Base, Canal Zone, $613,000. UNITED STATES AIR FORCES IN EUROPE Camp New Amsterdam, The Netherlands, $2,050,000. Germany, Various Locations, $46,464,000. Italy, Various Locations, $30,430,000. Morocco, Various Locations, $28,000,000. Oman, Various Locations, $28,600,000. Spain, Various Locations, $6,832,000. Turkey, Various Locations, $73,220,000. United Kingdom, Various Locations, $44,768,000. Various Locations, $67,550,000. CONTRACTING FOR CERTAIN PROJECTS SEC. 302. (a) The following projects authorized in section 301 may be carried out only as provided in subsection (c): Non-Destruct Inspection Facility in the amount of $5,900,000 and Depot Production Support Facility in the amount of $3,500,000 at McClellan Air Force Base, California. Alteration of Unaccompanied Enlisted Personnel Housing in the amount of $1,450,000 at Robins Air Force Base, Georgia. Alteration of F-107 Engine Facility in the amount of $420,000, Combat Communications Headquarters in the amount of $2,150,000, and Communications Electronic Installation Facility in the amount of $960,000 at Tinker Air Force Base, Oklahoma. Fire Protection-Bulk Fuel Farm in the amount of $382,000 at Arnold Engineering Development Center, Tennessee. RAPCON/CCF Facility in the amount of $490,000 at Edwards Air Force Base, California. Addition to Recreation Gymneisium in the amount of $2,150,000 at Eglin Air Force Base, Florida. Commercial Power Connection in the amount of $2,000,000 at Buckley Air National Guard Base, Colorado. Central Heat Plant in the amount of $11,700,000 at Chanute Air Force Base, Illinois. PMEL Laboratory in the amount of $530,000 at Columbus Air Force BEISC, Mississippi.

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 97.djvu/804

 97 STAT. 772 PUBLIC LAW 98-115—OCT. 11, 1983 Alteration of Electrical Distribution System in the amount of $1,500,000 and Voice Processing Training Facility in the amount of $7,800,000 at Goodfellow Air Force Base, Texas. Unaccompanied Enlisted Personnel Housing/Senior NCO Academy in the amount of $5,000,000 at Gunter Air Force Station, Alabama. Computer Training Facility in the amount of $11,900,000 and Unaccompanied Enlisted Personnel Housing with Dining Hall in the amount of $6,400,000 at Keesler Air Force Base, Mississippi. Chapel in the amount of $2,900,000 at Lackland Air Force Base, Texas. Academic Classroom (Weapons) in the amount of $6,100,000 at Lowry Air Force Base, Colorado. Gymnasium in the amount of $3,180,000 at Sheppard Air Force Base, Texas. Composite Operations in the amount of $3,700,000 and Com- posite Support Facility in the amount of $5,700,000 at Galena Airport, Alaska. Consolidated Operations/Maintenance Facility in the amount of $3,400,000 at Altus Air Force Base, Oklahoma. Gymnasium in the amount of $2,300,000 at Boiling Air Force Base, District of Columbia. Composite Wing Headquarters Facility in the amount of $3,200,000 at Charleston Air Force Base, South Carolina. Base Transportation Complex/Land Acquisition in the amount of $3,700,000 at Pope Air Force Base, North Carolina. Composite Medical Facility (David Grant Medical Center) Phase I in the amount of $5,000,000 at Travis Air Force Base, California, Upgrade Power Plants ADWS in the amount of $710,000 at Carswell Air Force Base, Texas. Unaccompanied Enlisted Personnel Housing in the amount of $8,500,000, Dining Hall in the amount of $3,730,000, alteration of Consolidated Base Personnel Office in the amount of $1,100,000, Hydrant Fueling System in the amount of $4,400,000, and alteration of Unaccompanied Enlisted Personnel Housing in the amount of $5,000,000 at Fairchild Air Force Base, Washington. Unaccompanied Enlisted Personnel Housing in the amount of $6,700,000 at Griffiss Air Force Base, New York. Addition to and alteration of Vehicle Maintenance Shop in the amount of $1,030,000, Dining Hall in the amount of $3,200,000, and Military Personnel Support Center in the amount of $5,600,000 at Grissom Air Force Base, Indiana. Air Field Apron Lighting in the amount of $1,230,000 and Unaccompanied Enlisted Personnel Housing in the amount of $5,500,000 at McConnell Air Force Base, Kansas. Unaccompanied Officer Personnel Housing in the amount of $4,000,000 at Offutt Air Force Base, Nebraska. Base Civil Engineer Maintenance Complex in the amount of $7,200,000 at Pease Air Force Base, New Hampshire. STS External Tank Area Icing Protection in the amount of $6,600,000 at Vandenberg Air Force Base, California. Physical Fitness Facility in the amount of $4,190,000 at Plattsburgh Air Force Base, New York.

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 97.djvu/805

 PUBLIC LAW 98-115—OCT. 11, 1983 97 STAT. 773 Alteration of Heat Plant in the amount of $1,800,000, Unac- companied Enlisted Personnel Housing in the amount of $8,600,000, Dining Hall in the amount of $3,300,000, Missile Maintenance Facility in the amount of $7,900,000, and Vehicle Maintenance Shop in the amount of $2,900,000 at Whiteman Air Force Base, Missouri. Base Support Center in the amount of $6,500,000, Composite Wing Facility in the amount of $1,280,000, Education Center in the amount of $2,750,000, and alteration of Base Entrance/Land Acquisition in the amount of $3,000,000 at Bergstrom Air Force Base, Texas. Consolidated Support Center in the amount of $6,800,000 at Cannon Air Force Base, New Mexico. Aircraft Maintenance Hangar in the amount of $7,700,000, Munitions Storage in the amount of $3,700,000, addition to Aircraft Maintenance Unit in the amount of $600,000, addition to Engine Inspection and Repair in the amount of $1,000,000, Aircraft Corrosion Control in the amount of $1,400,000, alter- ation of Unaccompanied Enlisted Personnel Housing in the amount of $3,100,000, and Airmen Dining Hall in the amount of $3,000,000 at Holloman Air Force Base, New Mexico. Unaccompanied Officer Personnel Housing in the amount of $4,600,000, Unaccompanied Enlisted Personnel Housing in the amount of $4,500,000, Civil Engineer Science Lab in the amount of $4,650,000, Education Center in the amount of $2,000,000, and Base Support Center in the amount of $6,500,000 at Tyndall Air Force Base, Florida. Addition to Satellite Communication Receiver Facility in the amount of $4,250,000, Consolidated Support Facility in the amount of $2,250,000, alteration of Unaccompanied Officer Per- sonnel Housing in the amount of $1,450,000, and alteration of Electrical/Mechanical Facilities (energy) in the amount of $900,000 at Clark Air Base, Republic of the Philippines. Air Base upgrade in the amount of $48,700,000 in Turkey. Various projects each costing $1,000,000 or less in the amount of $7,000,000 at various locations. (b) An advance payment to the Secretary of Transportation for a defense access road project under section 210 of title 23, United States Code, to widen Tippacanoe Avenue Bridge at Norton Air Force Base, California, in the amount of $6,400,000 may be made only as provided in subsection (c). (c) A contract for a project listed in subsection (a) may be entered into and the advance payment described in subsection Ob) may be made only if the funds to be obligated for the contract or advance payment are derived from the total amount of funds (if any) avail- able from (1) the net savings from the execution of the projects authorized by section 301 other than those listed in subsection (a), (2) total savings from cancellations of such projects, and (3) other sources, including savings from projects authorized for the Air Force in previous Military Construction Authorization Acts. (d) During fiscal year 1984, the Secretary of the Air Force may enter into a contract for the total amount authorized under section 301 for the construction of the Central Heating Plant at Chanute Air Force Base, Illinois, but may not obligate more than $11,700,000 of any funds described in subsection (c). Any amount for the con- struction of such facility in excess of $11,700,000 may be obligated Defense access road, advance payment. Obligated funds.

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 97.djvu/806

 97 STAT. 774 PUBLIC LAW 98-115—OCT. 11, 1983 only after fiscal year 1984 from funds realized from savings on other projects or to the extent provided for in appropriation Acts. Report to (e) Before the Secretary of the Air Force may advertise for bids, or conmilttees ^^^ negotiate, for a contract described in subsection (a) or make the advance payment under subsection (b), the Secretary shall submit a written report to the appropriate committees of Congress certifying that funds for the contract or advance payment are available in accordance with subsection (c) and identifying the source of the funds. Such a report may not be submitted before January 1, 1984. FAMILY HOUSING SEC. 303. The Secretary of the Air Force may construct family housing units (excluding land acquisition) and may acquire manu- factured home facilities at the following installations in the number of units shown, and in the amount shown, for each installation: Lajes Field, Portugal, one hundred and fifty units, $11,812,000. Havre Air Force Station, Montana, five units, $496,000. Forsyth Air Force Station, Montana, fifty units, $4,000,000. Camp New Amsterdam, The Netherlands, fifty units, $4,898,000. RAF Upper He3^ord, United Kingdom, three hundred units, $33,982,000. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING UNITS SEC. 304. (a) Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of the Air Force may make expenditures to improve existing military family housing units in an amount not to exceed $64,715,000, of which $10,559,000 is available only for energy conser- vation projects. OJ) Within the amount specified in subsection (a), the Secretary of the Air Force may, notwithstanding the maximum amount per unit prescribed in section 2825(b) of title 10, United States Code, carry out projects to improve existing military family housing units at the following installations in the number of units shown, and in the amount shown, for each installation: Carswell Air Force Base, Texas, two hundred and three units, $7,477,500. Kadena Air Base, Japan, three hundred and forty-two units, $20,586,200. ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES AND CONSTRUCTION DESIGN FOR FAMILY HOUSING PROJECTS SEC. 305. Subject to section 2807 of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of the Air Force may carry out architectural and engineering services and construction design in connection with military family housing projects (including improvements) in the amount of $5,000,000.

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 97.djvu/807

 PUBLIC LAW 98-115—OCT. 11, 1983 97 STAT. 775 TITLE IV—DEFENSE AGENCIES AUTHORIZED CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS AND LAND ACQUISITION FOR THE DEFENSE AGENCIES SEC. 401. The Secretary of Defense may acquire real property and may carry out military construction projects in the amounts shown for each of the following installations and locations: INSIDE THE UNITED STATES DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY Defense Fuel Support Point, Adak, Alaska, $14,200,000. Defense Property Disposal Office, Anchorage, Alaska, $2,500,000. Defense Fuel Support Point, Ozol, California, $1,100,000. Defense Fuel Support Point, Long Beach, California, $42,100,000. Defense Depot, Tracy, California, $480,000. Defense Property Disposal Office, Vandenberg, California, $880,000. Defense Property Disposal Office, Colorado Springs, Colorado, $810,000. Defense Fuel Support Point, Escanaba, Michigan, $1,000,000. Defense Depot, Memphis, Tennessee, $750,000. Defense Property Disposal Office, San Antonio, Texas, $500,000. Defense Property Disposal Office, Tooele, Utah, $420,000. Defense Property Disposal Office, Norfolk, Virginia, $940,000. Defense Property Disposal Office, Fort Lewis, Washington, $650,000. DEFENSE MAPPING AGENCY Hydrographic/Topographic Center, Brookmont, Maryland, $1,830,000. NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY Fort Meade, Maryland, $31,000,000. OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE Classified Activity, Fort Belvoir, Virginia, $3,000,000. Defense Systems Management College, Fort Belvoir, Virginia, $4,700,000. Presidio of Monterey, California, $29,100,000. DEFENSE INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE Fort Holabird, Maryland, $210,000. DEFENSE NUCLEAR AGENCY Armed Forces Radiobiology Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, $10,900,000. DEFENSE COMMUNICATIONS AGENCY Pentagon Building, Virginia, $1,000,000.

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 97.djvu/808

 97 STAT. 776 PUBLIC LAW 98-115—OCT. 11, 1983 OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY Defense Property Disposal Office, Hanau, Germany, $1,300,000. DEFENSE NUCLEAR AGENCY Johnston Island, $600,000. OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE Classified Location, $10,000,000. NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY Classified Location, $21,550,000. Classified Location, $25,200,000. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE DEPENDENTS SCHOOLS Ansbach, Germany, $4,800,000. Baumholder, Germany, $1,200,000. Darmstadt, Germany, $6,000,000. Giessen, Germany, $6,040,000. Spangdahlem Air Base, Germany, $6,350,000. Wildflecken, Germany, $5,200,000. Vicenza, Italy, $2,310,000. Lajes Field, Portugal, $4,590,000. Zaragoza Air Force Base, Spain, $680,000. Incirlik Air Base, Turkey, $5,800,000. RAF Lakenheath, United Kingdom, $1,120,000. RAF Wethersfield, United Kingdom, $2,832,000. FAMILY HOUSING SEC. 402. The Secretary of Defense may construct family housing units (including land acquisition) and acquire manufactured home facilities at classified locations overseas in the total amount of $1,210,000 for not in excess of eleven units. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING UNITS SEC. 403. Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of Defense may make expenditures to improve exist- ing military family housing units in an amount not to exceed $35,000. AUTHORITY TO USE UNOBLIGATED PRIOR YEAR AUTHORITY FOR CONTINGENCY CONSTRUCTION SEC. 404. During fiscal year 1984, the Secretary of Defense may carry out contingency construction projects under section 2804 of title 10, United States Code, in an amount not to exceed $16,000,000.

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 97.djvu/809

 PUBLIC LAW 98-115^0CT. 11, 1983 97 STAT. 777 TITLE V—NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION INFRASTRUCTURE AUTHORITY OP THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE TO MAKE CONTRIBUTIONS SEC. 501. The Secretary of Defense may make contributions for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization infrastructure program as provided in section 2806 of title 10, United States Code, in an amount not to exceed the amount authorized to be appropriated in section 605. RECOUPMENT OF PREFINANCING PAYMENTS SEC. 502. None of the funds appropriated pursuant to authoriza- Report to tions of appropriations in this Act may be obligated for payments for confmlttees^^ prefinancing of projects eligible, or expected to become eligible, to Detailed plans. be paid for (in whole or in part) by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization infrastructure program until the Secretary of Defense provides to the appropriate committees of Congress a written report which shall (1) include a complete accounting for funds authorized by this and previous Military Construction Authorization Acts for the prefinancing of projects otherwise eligible for funding under such program, and (2) describe in detail how the Secretary plans to recoup such funds that have been or are to be obligated for such prefinancing of projects. TITLE VI—AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS AND RECURRING ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, ARMY SEC. 601. (a) Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 1983, for military con- struction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of the Army in the total amount of $2,450,959,000 as follows: (1) For projects authorized by section 101 that are to be ^"^«' P- '^^'^• carried out inside the United States, $575,180,000. (2) For projects authorized by section 101 that are to be carried out outside the United States, $366,920,000. (3) For unspecified minor construction projects under section 2805 of title 10, United States Code, $27,400,000. (4) For architectural and engineering services and construc- tion design under section 2807 of title 10, United States Code, $188,000,000. (5) For military family housing functions— (A) for construction and acquisition of military family housing and facilities as authorized by title I, $173,131,000; ^"^e- P '^57. and (B) for support of military family housing, $1,120,328,000, of which not more than $86,258,000 may be obligated or expended for the leasing of military family housing units in foreign countries. (b) Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variations author- ized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 97.djvu/810

 97 STAT. 778 PUBLIC LAW 98-115—OCT. 11, 1983 101 may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appropriated under paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a). AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NAVY SEC. 602. (a) Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 1983, for military con- struction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of the Navy in the total amount of $1,763,520,000 as follows: Ante, p. 762. (1) Por projects authorized by section 201 that are to be carried out inside the United States, $875,811,000. (2) For projects authorized by section 201 that are to be carried out outside the United States, $94,285,000. (3) For unspecified minor construction projects under section 2805 of title 10, United States Code, $22,000,000. (4) For architectural and engineering services and construc- tion design under section 2807 of title 10, United States Code, $115,600,000. (5) For advances to the Secretary of Transportation for con- struction of defense access roads under section 210 of title 23, United States Code, $1,387,000. (6) For military family housing functions— (A) for construction and acquisition of military family Ante, p. 762. housing and facilities as authorized by title II, $74,961,000; and (B) for support of military family housing, $579,476,000, of which not more than $149,000 may be obligated or expended for the leasing of military family housing units in the United States, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and Guam and not more than $18,063,000 may be obligated or expended for the leasing of military family housing units in foreign countries. (b) Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variations author- ized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 201 may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appropriated under paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a). AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, AIR FORCE SEC. 603. (a) Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 1983, for military con- struction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of the Air Force in the total amount of $2,375,071,000 as follows: Ante, p. 768. (1) For projects authorized by section 301 that are to be carried out inside the United States, $857,984,000. (2) For projects authorized by section 301 that are to be carried out outside the United States, $464,944,000. (3) For unspecified minor construction projects under section 2805 of title 10, United States Code, $19,000,000. (4) For architectural and engineering services and construc- tion design under section 2807 of title 10, United States Code, $147,000,000.

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 97.djvu/811

 PUBLIC LAW 98-115—OCT. 11, 1983 97 STAT. 779 (5) For advances to the Secretary of Transportation for con- struction of defense access roads under section 210 of title 23, United States Code, $3,250,000. (6) For military family housing functions— (A) for construction and acquisition of military family housing and facilities as authorized by title III, ^"^«. P ^^^• $112,649,000; and (B) for support of military family housing, $770,244,000, of which not more than $492,000 may be obligated or expended for the leasing of military family housing units in the United States, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and Guam and not more than $53,046,000 may be obligated or expended for the leasing of military family housing units in foreign countries. (b) Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variations author- ized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 301 may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appropriated under paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a). AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, DEFENSE AGENCIES SEC. 604. (a) Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 1983, for military con- struction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of Defense (other than the military departments) in the total amount of $306,386,000 as follows: (1) For projects authorized by section 401 that are to be Ante, p. 775. carried out inside the United States, $143,070,000. (2) For projects authorized by section 401 that are to be carried out outside the United States, $90,572,000. (3) For unspecified minor construction projects under section 2805 of title 10, United States Code, $4,000,000. (4) For construction projects under the contingency construc- tion authority of the Secretary of Defense under section 2804 of title 10, United States Code, $16,000,000. (5) For architectural and engineering services and construc- tion design under section 2807 of title 10, United States Code, $33,000,000. (6) For military family housing functions— (A) for construction and acquisition of military family housing and facilities as authorized by title IV, $1,245,000; ^"^^. P '^75. and (B) for support of military family housing, $18,499,000, of which not more than $15,231,000 may be obligated or expended for the leasing of military family housing units in foreign countries. (b) Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variations author- ized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 401 may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appropriated under paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a).

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 97.djvu/812

 97 STAT. 780 PUBLIC LAW 98-115—OCT. 11, 1983 AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION SEC. 605. There is hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 1983, for contributions by the Secretary of Defense under section 2806 of title 10, United States Code, for the share of the United States of the cost of construction projects for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization infrastructure program, as authorized by section 501, the sum of $150,000,000. ACTIVITIES INCLUDED WITHIN AUTHORIZATIONS FOR MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING SEC 606. (a) Amounts authorized under sections 601 through 604 for construction and acquisition of military family housing and facilities include amounts for minor construction, improvements to existing military family housing units and facilities, relocation of military family housing units under section 2827 of title 10, United States Code, and architectural and engineering services and con- struction design. Support funding. (b) Amounts authorized under sections 601 through 604 for sup- port of military family housing include amounts for operating expenses, leasing expenses, maintenance of real property expenses, payments of principal and interest on mortgage debts incurred, and payments of mortgage insurance premiums authorized under sec- tion 222 of the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1715m). EXPIRATION OF AUTHORIZATIONS: EXTENSION OF CERTAIN PREVIOUS AUTHORIZATIONS SEC. 607. (a)(l) Except as provided in paragraph (2), all authoriza- Ante, pp. 757, tions Contained in titles I, II, III, and IV for military construction Ante^v'lil' projects, land acquisition, and family housing projects and in title V for contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization infra- structure program (and all authorizations of appropriations therefor contained in sections 601 through 605) expire on October 1, 1985, or on the date of the enactment of the Military Construction Authori- zation Act for fiscal year 1986, whichever is later. (2) The provisions of paragraph (1) do not apply to authorizations for which appropriated funds have been obligated before October 1, 1985, or the date of the enactment of the Military Construction Authorization Act for fiscal year 1986, whichever is later, for con- struction contracts, land acquisition, or contributions to such program. (b)(1) Notwithstanding the provisions of section 6060b) of the Mili- tary Construction Authorization Act, 1983 (Public Law 97-321; 96 Stat. 1567), authorizations for the following projects authorized in sections 101, 201, and 301 of the Military Construction Authoriza- tion Act, 1982 (Public Law 97-99; 95 Stat. 1359), shall remain in effect until October 1, 1984, or the date of enactment of the Military Construction Authorization Act for fiscal year 1985, whichever is later: (A) Solid Waste Incinerator construction in the amount of $4,100,000 at Fort Dix, New Jersey. (B) Crane and Equipment Maintenance Shop in the amount of $13,600,000 at the Charleston Naval Shipyard, Charleston South Carolina.

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 97.djvu/813

 PUBLIC LAW 98-115—OCT. 11, 1983 97 STAT. 781 (C) Steam Plant in the amount of $150,000,000 at the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, Bremerton, Washington. (D) Aircraft Parking Apron in the amount of $3,200,000 at the Naval Air Station, Oceana, Virginia. (2) Notwithstanding the provisions of section 606(b) of the Military Construction Authorization Act, 1983 (Public Law 97-321; 96 Stat. 1567), authorization for the following project authorized in section 201 of the Military Construction Authorization Act, 1981 (Public Law 96-418; 94 Stat. 1749), and extended in section 606(d) of the Military Construction Authorization Act, 1983 (Public Law 97-321; 96 Stat. 1549), shall remain in effect until October 1, 1984, or the date of enactment of the Military Construction Authorization Act for fiscal year 1985, whichever is later: Nautilus Memorial in the amount of $1,930,000 at the Naval Submarine Base, New London, Connecticut. (3) Notwithstanding the provisions of section 606(b) of the Military Construction Authorization Act, 1983 (Public Law 97-321; 96 Stat. 1567), authorization for the following projects authorized in section 201 of the Military Construction Authorization Act, 1980 (Public Law 96-125; 93 Stat. 928), and extended in section 705(d) of the Military Construction Authorization Act, 1982 (Public Law 97-99; 95 Stat. 1359), shall remain in effect until October 1, 1984, or the date of enactment of the Military Construction Authorization Act for fiscal year 1985, whichever is later: (A) Industrial Waste Collection and Treatment construction in the amount of $6,500,000 at the Long Beach Naval Shipyard, Long Beach, California. (B) Aircraft Maintenance Hangar Addition in the amount of $1,500,000 at the Naval Air Facility, Sigonella, Italy. ESTABLISHMENT OF CERTAIN AMOUNTS REQUIRED TO BE SPECIFIED BY LAW SEC. 608. For projects or contracts initiated during the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act or October 1, 1983, whichever is later, and ending on the date of the enactment of the Military Construction Authorization Act for fiscal year 1985 or October 1, 1984, whichever is later, the following amounts apply: (1) The maximum amount for an unspecified minor military construction project under section 2805 of title 10, United States Code, is $1,000,000. (2) The amount of a contract for architectural and engineer- ing services or construction design that makes such a contract subject to the reporting requirement under section 2807 of title 10, United States Code, is $300,000. (3) The maximum amount per unit for an improvement project for family housing units under section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, is $30,000. (4) The maximum annual rental for a family housing unit leased in the United States, Puerto Rico, or Guam under section 2828(b) of title 10, United States Code, is $6,000. (5)(A) The maximum annual rental for a family housing unit leased in a foreign country under section 2828(c) of title 10, United States Code, is $16,800. (B) The maximum number of family housing units that may be leased at any one time in foreign countries under section 2828(c) of title 10, United States Code, is 30,000.

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 97.djvu/814

 97 STAT. 782 PUBLIC LAW 98-115—OCT. 11, 1983 (6) The maximum rental per year for family housing facilities, or for real property related to family housing facilities, leased in a foreign country under section 2828(f) of title 10, United States Code, is $250,000. EFFECTIVE DATE FOR PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS SEC. 609. Titles I, II, III, IV, and V of this Act shall take effect on October 1, 1983. TITLE VII—GUARD AND RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES 10 USC 2231 et seq. AUTHORIZATION FOR FACILITIES SEC. 701. There are authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 1983, for the costs of acquisition, architectural and engineering services, and construction of facilities for the Guard and Reserve Forces, and for contributions therefor, under chapter 133 of title 10, United States Code (including the cost of acquisition of land for those facilities), the following amounts: (1) For the Department of the Army— (A) for the Army National Guard of the United States, $66,826,000; and (B) for the Army Reserve, $54,700,000. (2) For the Department of the Navy, for the Naval and Marine Corps Reserves, $28,245,000. (3) For the Department of the Air Force— (A) for the Air National Guard of the United States, $108,620,000; and (B) for the Air Force Reserve, $41,200,000. MODIFICATION OF GUARD AND RESERVE MINOR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORITY Effective date. SEC. 702. Effective on October 1, 1983, section 2233a(a)(l) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking out "$200,000" and inserting in lieu thereof "$400,000". TITLE VIII—GENERAL PROVISIONS Validated deficit. MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING LEASING PROGRAM SEC. 801. Section 2828 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end thereof the following subsection: "(g)(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary of a military department may enter into a contract for the lease of family housing units to be constructed on or near a military installa- tion within the United States under the Secretary's jurisdiction at which there is a validated deficit in family housing. Housing units leased under this subsection shall be assigned, without rental charge, as family housing to members of the armed forces who are eligible for assignment to military family housing. A contract under this section shall include a provision that the obligation of the United States to make payments under the contract in any fiscal year is subject to the availability of appropriations for that purpose. "(2) Each contract under paragraph (1) shall be awarded through the use of publicly advertised, competitively bid or competitively

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 97.djvu/815

 PUBLIC LAW 98-115—OCT. 11, 1983 97 STAT. 783 negotiated contracting procedures. Such a contract may provide for the contractor of the housing facilities to operate and maintain such housing facilities during the term of the lease. "(3) Each contract under this subsection shall require that hous- ing units constructed pursuant to the contract shall be constructed to Department of Defense specifications. "(4) A contract under this subsection may be for any period not in excess of 20 years (excluding the period required for construction of the housing facilities). "(5) A contract under this subsection shall provide that, upon the termination of the lease period, the United States shall have the right of first refusal to acquire all right, title, and interest to the housing facilities constructed and leased under the contract. "(6) A contract may not be entered into for the lease of housing facilities under this subsection until— "(A) the Secretary of Defense submits to the appropriate committees of Congress, in writing, an economic analysis (based upon accepted life cycle costing procedures) which demonstrates that the proposed contract is cost effective when compared with alternative means of furnishing the same housing facilities; and "(B) a period of 21 calendar days has expired following the date on which the economic analysis is received by those com- mittees. "(7) This subsection may be implemented only by a pilot program. In carrying out such pilot program— "(A) the Secretary of each military department may not enter into more than two contracts under this subsection; and "(B) any such contract may not be for more than 300 family housing units. "(8) A contract may not be entered into under this subsection after October 1, 1985.". Contract time limitation. First refusal right. Economic analysis, submittal to congressional committees. Pilot program. MILITARY HOUSING RENTAL GUARANTEE PROGRAM SEC. 802. (a) The Secretary of a military department, under uni- form regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, may enter into an gigreement to Eussure the occupancy of rental housing to be constructed by a private developer or by a State or local housing authority on private land, on land owned by a State or local government, or on land owned by the United States, if the housing is to be located on or near a new military installation or an existing military installation that has a shortsige of housing to meet the requirements of eligible members of the Armed Forces (with or without accompan5ring dependents). An agreement under this sec- tion shall include a provision that the obligation of the United States to make payments under the agreement in any fiscal year is subject to the availability of appropriations for that purpose. (b) An agreement under subsection (a)— (1) may not sissure the occupancy of more than 97 percent of the units constructed under the agreement; (2) shall establish initial rental rates that are not more than rates for comparable rental dwelling units in the same general market area and may include an escalation clause for operation and maintenance costs which shall (if included) be effective for the term of agreement; (3) may not apply to existing housing; 10 USC 2821 note. Payments provision. Agreeme nt conditions.

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 97.djvu/816

 97 STAT. 784 PUBLIC LAW 98-115—OCT. 11, 1983 Economic analysis, submittal to congressional committees. Pilot program. (4) shall require that the housing units be constructed to Department of Defense specifications; (5) may not be for a term in excess of 15 years; (6) may not renewed; (7) may not assure more than an amount equivalent to the shelter rent of the housing units, determined on the basis of amortizing initial construction costs; (8) may only be entered into to the extent that there is a validated deficit in military family housing; (9) may only be entered into if existing military-controlled housing at all installations in the commuting area (except for a new installation or an installation for which there is projected a significant increase in the number of families due to an increase in the number of authorized personnel) has exceeded 97 percent usc for a period of not less than 18 consecutive months immedi- ately preceding the date on which the agreement is entered into, excluding units temporarily inactivated for major repair or improvements; (10) shall provide for priority of occupancy for military families; and (11) shall include a clause rendering the agreement null and void if, in the opinion of the Secretary of the military depart- ment concerned, the owner of the housing fails to maintain a satisfactory level of operation and maintenance. (c) An agreement under subsection (a) shall be made through the use of publicly advertised, competitively bid or competitively negoti- ated procedures. (d) An agreement may not be entered into under subsection (a) until— (1) the Secretary of Defense submits to the appropriate com- mittees of Congress, in writing, an economic analysis (based upon accepted life cycle costing procedures) which demonstrates that the proposed agreement is cost effective when compared with alternative means of furnishing the same housing facili- ties; and (2) a period of 21 calendar days has expired following the date on which the economic analysis is received by those committees. (e) The Secretary concerned may require that disputes arising under an agreement entered into under subsection (a) be decided in accordance with the procedures provided for by the Contract Dis- putes Act of 1978 (41 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). (f) This section may be implemented only by a pilot program. In carrying out such pilot program— (1) the Secretary of each military department may not enter into more than two agreements under this section; and (2) the Secretary of a military department may not enter into such an agreement for more than 300 family housing units at one location. (g) An agreement may not be entered into under this section after September 30, 1985. 10 USC 2821 note. FAMILY HOUSING CONSTRUCTED OVERSEAS SEC. 803. (a) The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that any contract entered into for the construction of military family housing for the Department of Defense in a foreign country shall require the

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 97.djvu/817

 PUBLIC LAW 98-115—OCT. 11, 1983 97 STAT. 785 use of manufactured or factory-built housing which is fabricated in the United States by a United States contractor. (b) The Secretary of Defense may waive subsection (a) with respect to not more than 10 percent of the total number of military family housing units authorized to be constructed in foreign countries in any year if— (1) the Secretary determines that with respect to such units compliance with the requirement in such subsection is infea- sible; and (2) the Secretary— (A) notifies the appropriate committees of the Congress in writing of his intention to waive such requirements and includes in the notification the justification for the waiver, and (B) a period of 21 days has elapsed after the receipt by such committees of the notice. (c) This section shall apply to any contract entered into after the date of the enactment of this Act. Waiver. Notification to congressional committees. ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES AND CONSTRUCTION DESIGN SEC. 804. The first sentence of section 2807(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by striking out "such purposes" and inserting in lieu thereof "military construction and military family housing"; and (2) by inserting ", family housing projects, and projects under- taken in connection with the authority provided under section 2854 of this title that are" after "projects". IMPACT ASSISTANCE FOR AREAS AFFECTED BY DEPLOYMENT OF THE MX MISSILE SEC. 805. Subsection (a) of section 802 of the Military Construction Authorization Act, 1981 (10 U.S.C. 139 note), is amended— (1) by inserting "communities located near MX Missile System sites and" after "may assist"; and (2) by striking out "East Coast Trident Base" the second place it appears and inserting in lieu thereof "MX Missile System or the East Coast Trident Base, as the case may be,". (b) Subsection (b) of such section is amended— (1) by striking out "East Coast Trident Base" in paragraph (I)(C) and inserting in lieu thereof "MX Missile System site or the East Coast Trident Base, as the case may be"; and (2) by striking out "East Coast Trident Base" in paragraph (3) and inserting in lieu thereof "MX Missile System sites or the East Coast Trident Base, as the case may be". (c) Subsection (d) of such section is amended by inserting "the MX Missile System deployment program and" before "the East Coast Trident Base". (d) The heading of such section is amended by inserting "BY DEPLOYMENT OF THE MX MISSILE AND" after "AREAS AFFECTED".

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 97.djvu/818

 97 STAT. 786 PUBLIC LAW 98-115—OCT. 11, 1983 Comprehensive review. 10 USC 2807 note. 15 USC 632. Report to congressional committees. "Reasonable share." "Reasonable threshold amount." SMALL BUSINESS SET-ASIDE FOR ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES AND CONSTRUCTION DESIGN SEC. 806. (a) The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a comprehen- sive review of current policies and practices of the Department of Defense with regard to the award of contracts for architectural and engineering services and construction design for military construc- tion projects. The Secretary shall conduct such review with a view to determining whether current policies and practices of the Depart- ment of Defense result in a reasonable distribution of such contracts to firms of all sizes throughout the architect-engineer community. Ob) Upon the completion of such review, the Secretary shall modify current policies and practices of the Department to the extent necessary to ensure— (1) that small business concerns (as defined in section 3 of the Small Business Act) are assured of a reasonable share of such contracts; and (2) that large architect-engineer firms are not precluded from competing for such contracts when the estimated amount of such contracts is greater than a reasonable threshold amount prescribed by the Secretary. (c) Not later than March 1, 1984, the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a written report on the results of the review required by subsection (a) and on any changes made to current policies and practices as required by subsection (b). (d) For the purposes of this section: (1) The term "reasonable share" means an appropriate per- centage share of all contracts referred to in subsection (a) as determined by the Secretary of Defense after consultation with the Admininstrator of the Small Business Administration and representatives of the architect-engineer community. (2) The term "reasonable threshold amount" means an appro- priate estimated contract dollar amount determined by the Secretary of Defense after consultation with the Administrator of the Small Business Administration and representatives of the architect-engineer community. SALE AND REPLACEMENT OF NONEXCESS REAL PROPERTY SEC. 807. (a)(1) Chapter 159 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 2667 the following new section: 10 USC 2667a. "§ 2667a. Sale and replacement of nonexcess real property "(a)(1) Subject to paragraph (2), the Secretary of Defense may carry out real property transactions in accordance with this section. Any such transaction shall consist of— "(A) the sale of any real property under the control of the Department of Defense other than property described in para- graph (3); and "(B) such acquisition of land, construction and acquisition of facilities to replace facilities included in the property to be sold, and relocation of Department of Defense activities to such replacement facilities as may be required to ensure efficient and effective continuity of defense functions being carried out at the property to be sold. "(2) A transaction under this section may not be carried out unless the transaction is specifically authorized by law.

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 97.djvu/819

 PUBLIC LAW 98-115—OCT. 11, 1983 97 STAT. 787 "(3) A transaction under this section may not include the sale of any of the following: "(A) Public domain lands. "(B) Property which can be considered excess under the provi- sions of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 (40 U.S.C. 471 et seq.). "(C) Property that the Secretary of the Interior has deter- mined under subsection (b)(2) to be suitable for usc as a public park or recreation area and with respect to which the Secretary of the Interior has sent a notification to the Secretary of Defense under such subsection. "(b)(1) A proposal to Congress for authorization of a transaction under this section shall include— "(A) a description of the property to be sold (including the specific location of the property); "(B) an estimate of the fair market value of the property to be sold; "(C) an explanation of the need for any property or facilities to replace property or facilities to be sold under the transaction; "(D) an estimate of the costs of such replacement facilities and of relocation from the property to be sold to the replace- ment facilities; and "(E) a net financial statement for the transaction, including a schedule of estimated expenditures under the transaction and a schedule of the estimated proceeds to be realized from the sale of property under the transaction. "(2) Before proposing a transaction to Congress under this section, the Secretary of Defense shall notify the Secretary of the Interior in writing of the proposed transaction. The transaction may not be proposed to Congress if the Secretary of the Interior notifies the Secretary of Defense in writing not later than 60 days after receipt of the notification that he has determined that the property pro- posed to be sold under the transaction is suitable for usc as a public park or recreation area. Any such determination by the Secretary of the Interior shall be made in accordance with procedures and standards used by the Secretary under section 203(k)(2) of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 (40 U.S.C. 484(k)(2)). "(c) A transaction authorized pursuant to this section— "(1) shall be accomplished, to the extent feasible, using com- petitive bid procedures or qualified contract realty brokers; "(2) may not be carried out unless the property to be conveyed under the transaction will be sold for at least the equivgilent of its fair market value; "(3) may not be carried out unless the amount of the esti- mated proceeds from the sale of property under the transaction exceeds the amount of the costs of such transaction described in subsection (e); and "(4) may not be carried out unless the activities intended to be performed at the replacement facilities are substantially similar in character or nature to those performed at the property to be sold. "(d)(1) The sale of any real property pursuant to a transaction authorized under this section shall be conducted by the Administra- tor of General Services. The Administrator may sell such property upon such credit terms and financial conditions as he and the Secretary of Defense may agree upon. The Administrator shall Prohibited sales. Proposal to Congress. Notification of Interior Secretary. Sale conducted byGSA Admi nistrator.

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 97.djvu/820

 97 STAT. 788 PUBLIC LAW 98-115—OCT. 11, 1983 execute such documents for the transfer of title and take such other actions as necessary to dispose of such property under the provisions of this section. Proceeds. "(2) Proceeds from any such sale shall be covered into the Treasury. Reimbursement. "(3) The Secretary of Defense shall reimburse the Administrator for expenses incurred in making such sales as authorized by subsec- tion (e)(3). "(e) To the extent provided for in appropriation Acts, the Secre- tary of Defense— "(1) may carry out the acquisition of land and the construc- tion and acquisition of facilities included as part of an author- ized transaction under this section; "(2) may pay the reasonable relocation expenses made neces- sary by the transaction; and "(3) may pay all expenses incident to the sale of property under the transaction, including reimbursement of expenses under subsection (d)(3). "(f) Upon completion of a transaction under this section— "(1) ninety-five percent of the proceeds remaining from the sale of property under the transaction (after subtracting the amount of applicable costs described in subsection (e)) shall remain in the Treasury; and "(2) an amount equal to five percent of the proceeds remain- ing from the sale of property under the transaction (after subtracting the amount of applicable costs described in subsec- tion (e)) shall be credited to the account established under subsection (g). "(g)(1) There is hereby established on the books of the Treasury an account to be known as the Department of Defense Facilities Replacement Management Account (hereinafter in this section referred to as the 'account'). The account shall be administered by the Secretary of Defense and shall be administered as a single account. "(2) The account may be used for— "(A) advanced planning, design, and other expenses related to potential future transactions; and "(B) advances where necessary to meet expenses of an author- ized transaction before appropriations are made available for the transaction. "(3) An expenditure from the account in an amount greater than $300,000 may not be made until the Secretary of Defense has notified the appropriate committees of Congress in writing of the proposed expenditure and a period of 21 days has elapsed after the date of the receipt of that notification by those committees. "(4) Any unobligated moneys in the account at the end of a fiscal year in excess of $50,000,000 (or in excess of any lesser amount determined by the Secretary of Defense to be sufficient for the purpose of this section) shall be covered into the Treasury.". (2) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 159 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2667 the following new item: "2667a. Sale and replacement of nonexcess real property.". (b) There is authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Defense Facilities Management Account established by section 2809 786. of title 10, United States Code (as added by subsection (a)), for Department of Defense Facilities Replacement Management Account. Establishment. Notification to congressional committees. Unobligated funds. Appropriation authorization. Ante,

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 97.djvu/821

 PUBLIC LAW 98-115—OCT. 11, 1983 97 STAT. 789 purposes of initial capitalization, the sum of $50,000,000. Any amount appropriated pursuant to this subsection shall remain avail- able until expended. (c) Effective on October 1, 1985— (1) section 2667a of title 10, United States Code (as added by subsection (a)), is repealed; (2) the table of sections at the beginning of chapter 159 of such title is amended by striking out the item relating to section 2667a; (3) the Department of Defense Facilities Replacement Man- agement Account established by such section is abolished and any balance in such account is transferred into the Treasury. (d) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary of Defense may not take any action to initiate the sale, lease, rental, excessing, or disposal of any portion of the land identified on the date of the enactment of this Act as a part of Fort DeRussy, Hawaii. Effective date. Repeal. Abolition. 10 USC 2667a note. THRESHOLD FOR COMMUNITY PLANNING ASSISTANCE SEC. 808. Effective on October 1, 1983, section 2391(b)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking out "2,500" and inserting in lieu thereof "2,000". Effective date. FEDERAL CONTRIBUTION FOR MOVING LANDFILL NEAR LANGLEY AIR FORCE BASE SEC. 809. (a) The Secretary of the Air Force may contribute, as the share of the United States for the moving of the existing landfill adjacent to Langley Air Force Base, Virginia, a sum equal to not more than 50 percent of the cost of moving such landfill to a new location, but not more than $3,750,000. The Secretary may not make any contribution under this section unless the new location of the landfill meets the minimum standards for the location of landfills on or near airport facilities prescribed by the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration in Order Number 5200.5 (Guidance Concerning Sanitary Landfills on or Near Airports). (b) The Secretary shall obtain such assurances as he determines necessary (including the execution of covenants and easements) to ensure that the present landfill location adjacent to Langley Air Force Beise will be used in the future only in a manner compatible with the Air Installation Compatible Use Zone (AICUZ) for Langley Air Force Base. LAND ACQUISITION FOR FUTURE FAMILY HOUSING REQUIREMENTS, SAN DIEGO, CAUFORNIA SEC. 810. The Secretary of the Navy may acquire up to 125 acres of real property in San Diego, California (or the surrounding area), that the Secretary determines to be suitable as a site or sites for future construction of military family housing for the Department of the Navy. Such property may be acquired by exchange or by purchase using funds derived from savings in carrying out previ- ously authorized projects. The Secretary may acquire options on such property as provided in section 2677(a) of title 10, United States Code, and (notwithstanding section 2677(b) of such title) may pay, from funds available for projects under section 285 of title 10, United States Code, not more than $1,000,000 for such options. Exchange or purchase.

�