text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 101 Part 1.djvu/207

 PUBLIC LAW 100-17—APR. 2, 1987

101 STAT. 177

(1) which are to be constructed on any highway in Los Angeles County, California, designated as a part of the National System of Interstate and Defense Highways by section 140 of the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1978; and (2) the costs of construction of which are included in the interstate cost estimate for 1985.

92 Stat. 2711.

SEC. 142. SUBSTITUTE TRANSIT PROJECT IN OREGON.

(a) APPROVAL OF PROJECT.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, upon the joint request of the Governor of the State of Oregon and the local governments concerned, the Secretary may approve a substitute transit project for construction of a light rail transit system in lieu of construction of any eligible interstate lanes if such substitute project is in or adjacent to the proposed right-of-way for such lanes. (b) ELIGIBILITY FOR FEDERAL ASSISTANCE.—Upon approval of

any

substitute transit project under subsection (a), the costs of construction of the eligible interstate lanes for which such project is substituted shall not be eligible for funds authorized under section 108(b) of the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1956 and a sum equal to Ante, pp. 142, the Federal share of such costs, as included in the latest interstate 175. cost estimate approved by Congress, shall be available to the Secretary to incur obligations under section 103(e)(4) of title 23, United States Code, for the Federal share of the costs of such substitute project. (c) LIMITATION ON ELIGIBILITY.—By September 30, 1989, any sub- Contracts, stitute transit project approved under subsection (a) (for which the Secretary finds that sufficient Federal funds are available) must be under contract for construction or construction must have commenced. If any such substitute transit project is not under contract for construction or construction has not commenced by such date, then immediately after such date, the Secretary shall withdraw approval of such project and no funds shall be appropriated under the authority of section 103(e)(4) of title 23, United States Code, for such project. (d) ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS.— (1) STATUS OF SUBSTITUTE PROJECT.—A substitute

transit project approved under subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a substitute transit project for purposes of section 103(e)(4) of title 23, United States Code (other than subparagraphs (C) and (O)). (2) REDUCTION OF UNOBLIGATED INTERSTATE APPORTIONMENT.—

,

Unobligated apportionments for the Interstate System in the State of Oregon shall, on the date of approval of a substitute transit project under subsection (a), be reduced in the proportion that the Federal share of the costs of the construction of the eligible interstate lanes for which such project is substituted bears to the Federal share of the total cost of all interstate routes in such State as reflected in the latest cost estimate approved by Congress. (3) ADMINISTRATION THROUGH FHWA.—The Secretary shall administer this section through the Federal Highway Administration. (e) ELIGIBLE INTERSTATE LANES DEFINED.—For purposes of this section, the term "eligible interstate lanes" means any bus lanes which are to be constructed on Interstate Route 1-205 in Oregon.

•..J

f-r-H

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 101 Part 1.djvu/208

 101 STAT. 178

PUBLIC LAW 100-17—APR. 2, 1987

SEC. 143. PAYBACK OF RIGHT-OF-WAY EXPENSES, New York.

r

(a) EFFECT OF REPAYMENT.—Upon repayment by the State of New York to the Treasurer of the United States of an amount as determined by the Secretary to be equal to the amount of Federal funds expended to acquire property for the portion of 1-478 which was withdrawn from the Interstate System in accordance with the provisions of section 103(e)(4) of title 23, United States Code, less any amount not required to be repaid with respect to such property under section 103(e)(7) of such title, the State of New York shall be absolved of any further responsibility for repayment and will be deemed to have met all of the repayment requirements of section 103(e)(7) of such title. Ob) USE OF REPAID FUNDS.—The amount repaid to the United States under this section shall be deposited to the credit of the appropriation for "Federal-Aid Highway (Trust Fund)". Such repayment shall be credited to the unprogrammed balance of funds apportioned to the State of New York in accordance with section 10403)(1) of title 23, United States Code. The amount so credited shall be in addition to all other funds then apportioned to such State and shall be available for expenditure in accordance with the provisions of such title. SEC. 144. GEORGIA STATE ROUTE 400.

(a) CREDIT AND USE OF FEDERAL FUNDS.—The amount of all Federal-aid highway funds paid to the State of Georgia on account of the section of State Route 400, a 6-lane, limited access major arterial highway connecting Interstate Route 1-285 and Interstate Route I85 in Fulton County, Georgia, may be repaid to the Treasurer of the United States. The amount so repaid shall be deposited to the credit of the appropriation for "Federal Aid Highways (Trust Fund)". Such repayment shall be credited to the unobligated balance of Federalaid highway funds of the same class last appropriated to the State of Georgia. The amount so credited shall be in addition to all other funds then apportioned or allocated to such State during the fiscal year for which the credit was received and shall be available for expenditure in accordance with the provisions of title 23, United States Code. (b) APPLICABILITY OF TOLL RESTRICTIONS.—As provided in subsec-

tion (a) of this section, upon the repayment of Federal-aid highway funds, and removal from the Federal-aid highway programs, such sections of State Route 400 shall be free of any and all restrictions contained in title 23, United States Code, or in any regulations issued thereunder, with respect to the imposition and collection of tolls or other charges thereon or for the use thereof. SEC. 145. EXEMPTION FROM RIGHT-OF-WAY RESTRICTION. Michigan. Contracts. Exports.

A facility located in part on the right-of-way of Interstate Route 1-94 in Michigan and in the vicinity of the interchange of 1-94 and Michigan State Route 25 is hereby exempt from the restrictions contained in section 111 of title 23, United States Code, prohibiting certain commercial establishments on rights-of-way of the Interstate System. Such exemption shall be for the purpose of permitting the Michigan Department of Transportation to enter into a lease agreement allowing the use of such facility for the sale of only those articles which are for export and for consumption outside the United States.

�

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 101 Part 1.djvu/209

 PUBLIC LAW 100-17—APR. 2, 1987

101 STAT. 179

SEC. 146. RIGHT-OF-WAY DONATION. (a) CREDIT FOR DONATED LANDS AND DONATION PROCEDURES.—

Section 323 of title 23, United States Code, is amended— (1) by inserting "(a) DONATIONS OF PROPERTY BEING AC-

QUIRED.—" before "Nothing"; and (2) by adding at the end the following new subsections: "(b) CREDIT FOR DONATED LANDS.— "(1) GENERAL RULE.—Notwithstanding any provision of this.

title, the State matching share for a project with respect to which Federal assistance is provided out of the Highway Trust Fund (other than the Mass Transit Account) may be credited by the fair market value of land incorporated into the project and lawfully donated to the State after the date of the enactment of this subsection. "(2) ESTABLISHMENT OF FAIR MARKET VALUE.—The fair market value of the donated land shall be established as determined by the Secretary. Fair market value shall not include increases and decreases in the value of donated property caused by the project. For purposes of this subsection, the fair market value of donated land shall be established as of the date the donation becomes effective or when equitable title to the land vests in the State, whichever is earlier. "(3) LIMITATION ON APPLICABILITY.—This subsection shall not apply to donations made by an agency of a Federal, State, or local government.

,.

,

"(4) LIMITATION ON AMOUNT OF CREDIT.—The credit received

by a State pursuant to this subsection may not exceed the State's matching share for the project to which the donation is applied. "(c) PROCEDURES.—A gift or donation in accordance with subsection (a) may be made at any time during the development of a project. Any document executed as part of such donation prior to the approval of an environmental document prepared pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 shall clearly indicate 42 USC 4321 that—

"(1) all alternatives to a proposed alignment will be studied and considered pursuant to such Act; "(2) acquisition of property under this section shall not influence the environmental assessment of a project including the decision relative to the need to construct the project or the selection of a specific location; and "(3) any property acquired by gift or donation shall be revested in the grantor or successors in interest if such property is not required for the alignment chosen after public hearings, if required, and completion of the environmental document.". (b) DONATED LANDS IN CALIFORNIA.— (1) TREATMENT AS PROJECT COST.—Notwithstanding any other

provision of law, the fair market value of any lands which have been or in the future are donated or dedicated to the State of California necessary for the right-of-way for relocation and construction of California State Route 73 in Orange County, California, from its interchange with Interstate Route 1-405 to its interchange with Interstate Route 1-5 shall be included as a part of the cost of such relocation and construction project and shall be credited first toward payment of the non-Federal share of the cost of such relocation and construction project.

note.

,;

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 101 Part 1.djvu/210

 101 STAT. 180

Ante, p. 179.

PUBLIC LAW 100-17—APR. 2, 1987 (2) CREDIT.—The fair market value of lands referred to in paragraph (1) shall be established by the Secretary. If such fair market value exceeds the non-Federal share of the relocation and construction project referred to in paragraph (1), then the excess amount, upon the request of the State of California, shall be credited toward the non-Federal share of the cost of any other project on the Federal-aid system in Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Ventura Counties, California. (3) TREATMENT OF IRREVOCABLE OFFER.—To further the purposes of this section and section 323 of title 23, United States Code, any recorded irrevocable offer of dedication or donation of property within the right-of-way for the project referred to in paragraph (1) shall be considered as part of the State right-ofway acquisition for purposes of this subsection if such offer is irrevocable and effective no later than such time as the State of California requests final reimbursement for the Federal share. (1) LIMITATION.—In no case shall the amount of Federal-aid reimbursement to the State of California on account of the relocation and construction project referred to in paragraph (1) exceed the actual cost to the State for such project.

Virginia. District of Columbia.

SEC. 147. SHIRLEY HIGHWAY TRAFFIC RESTRICTIONS. .. -r, T (a) EXPRESS LANES.—

Motor vehicles.

(1) RusH HOUR RESTRICTIONS.—Except in the case of an emergency as determined by the State of Virginia or the District of Columbia, the State of Virginia and the District of Columbia shall prohibit the use of the Shirley Highway express lanes by a vehicle other than a bus, an emergency vehicle, a vehicle carrying 4 or more persons, and a motorcycle— (A) on northbound lanes, during the hours of 6 o'clock ante meridiem to 9 o'clock ante meridiem on Monday through Friday, exclusive of holidays, and (B) on southbound lanes, during the hours of 3:30 o'clock post meridiem to 6 o'clock post meridiem on Monday through Friday, exclusive of holidays. The State of Virginia and the District of Columbia may not prohibit the use of such lanes during such hours by a bus, an emergency vehicle, or a vehicle carrying 4 or more persons. (2) U S E OF EXPRESS LANES AT OTHER TIMES.—The State of Virginia and the District of Columbia may not prohibit the use of the Shirley Highway express lanes during hours other than the hours described in paragraph (1) by a vehicle which is not also prohibited from using the other lanes of the Shirley Highway. (b) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this section— (1) EMERGENCY VEHICLE.—The term "emergency vehicle" includes a public utility vehicle on legitimate emergency business. (2) MOTORCYCLE.—The term "motorcycle" means a motor vehicle designed to travel on not more than 3 wheels in contact with the ground. (3) SHIRLEY HIGHWAY EXPRESS LANES.—The term "Shirley Highway express lanes" means the high occupancy vehicle lanes on Interstate Route 1-395 in the District of Columbia and Virginia and on Interstate Route 1-95 from its intersection with Interstate Route 1-395 to Woodbridge, Virginia. (c) ENFORCEMENT.—The Secretary shall withhold 1 percent of the amount required to be apportioned to the State of Virginia or to the

i&i;wj 'j-^i

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 101 Part 1.djvu/211

 PUBLIC LAW 100-17—APR. 2, 1987

101 STAT. 181

District of Columbia under sections 104 and 144 of title 23, United States Code, on the first day of the fiscal year succeeding any fiscal year in which the State of Virginia or the District of Columbia, as the case may be, is in violation of any provision of this section. SEC. 148. RAILROAD RELOCATION AND DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM.

(a) FEDERAL SHARE.—Section 163(n) of the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1973 (23 U.S.C. 130 note) is amended by striking out "95 per centum of the cost." and inserting in lieu thereof "the Federal share provided in section 120(a) of title 23, United States Code.". (b) AUTHORIZATION.—Section 163(p) of such Act is amended by inserting after "September 30, 1986," the following: "and $15,000,000 per fiscal year for each of fiscal years 1987, 1988, 1989, 1990, and 1991,". SEC. 149. DEMONSTRATION AND PRIORITY PROJECTS. (a) PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS.— (1) PASSAIC COUNTY, NEW JERSEY.—The

i

t t ' 4

Secretary shall utilize the procedures adopted to carry out the demonstration project under section 141 of the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1976 and 23 USC 124 note, the methods for processing highway projects required to be established by section 129 of the Surface Transportation Assistance Act of 1982 to accelerate design and construction of a 23 USC 105 note, highway project which completes a gap on the Federal-aid primary system in an urban area along the Passaic River in Passaic County, New Jersey, and for which most of the right-ofway has been acquired. (2) BRICK TOWNSHIP, NEW JERSEY.—The Secretary shall carry out a highway project to demonstrate methods of improving traffic operations and reducing accidents (A) at a high-volume rotary intersection in Brick Township, New Jersey, and (B) on a route connecting such intersection with another high-volume rotary intersection in Wall Township, New Jersey. (3) JOHNSTOWN, PENNSYLVANIA.—The Secretary shall carry out a demonstration project in the vicinity of Johnstown, Pennsylvania, for the purpose of demonstrating methods by which a highway construction project on a segment of the Federal-aid primary system will enhance highway safety and economic development in an area of high unemployment. (4) FORT SMITH, ARKANSAS.—The Secretary shall carry out a highway project to demonstrate the economic growth and development benefits of widening a segment of the Federal-aid urban system connecting a community college and a large commercial center in the vicinity of Fort Smith, Arkansas, and of improving traffic signalization on such segment. (5) MINNESOTA.—The Secretary shall carry out a demonstration project on the Federal-aid urban system for the purpose of demonstrating the economic and safety benefits— (A) of constructing (i) a grade separation between a railroad line and a highway, and (ii) a half diamond interchange, in the vicinity of Moorhead, Minnesota; and (B) of reconstructing 2 deteriorated segments of a major east-west highway on the Federal-aid primary system in the vicinities of Fosston and Bagley, Minnesota. (6) LoYSBURG, PENNSYLVANIA.—The Secretary shall carry out a highway project to construct a 2-lane bypass around Loysburg in Bedford County, Pennsylvania, for the purpose of dem-

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 101 Part 1.djvu/212

 101 STAT. 182

PUBLIC LAW 100-17—APR. 2, 1987 onstrating methods of accelerating project construction and resolving environmental concerns among Federal and State agencies. (7)

« '•. V

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CAUFORNIA.—The Secretary

shall carry out a demonstration project in the vicinity of the Ontario International Airport in San Bernardino County, California, for the purpose of demonstrating methods of improving highway access to an airport which is projected to incur a substantial increase in air service. (8) ALTOONA, PENNSYLVANIA.—The Secretary shall carry out a highway project to close a gap of approximately 12 miles in a multilane limited access road connecting the city of Altoona to the borough of Tyrone in Blair County, Pennsylvania, for the purpose of demonstrating state of the art delineation technology. For comparison purposes, the highway section to be constructed shall connect a highway section constructed with current delineation technology and an older highway section constructed with traditional delineation technology. The project shall demonstrate the latest horizontal and vertical delineation techniques and utilize innovative techniques in highway delineation treatments to improve traffic control and highway safety. All delineation elements shall be designed to provide the optimum life-cycle costs, thereby maximizing the highway safety benefits and minimizing future maintenance costs. The Secretary shall provide necessary technical assistance in the design and construction of the project. Upon completion of the project, the highway shall be added to the Federal-aid primary system.

-•/;'

Ak.-i:fioi':M'Jt'.

(9) LOUISIANA.—

(A) LAFAYETTE.—The Secretary is authorized to carry out a highway project to demonstrate the benefits to traffic flow and transportation of labor and materials by construction of a highway to provide limited continuous access between an interstate route and a highway on the Federal-aid primary system in Lafayette, Louisiana. (B) SHREVEPORT.—The Secretary is authorized to carry out a highway project which will demonstrate methods of reducing traffic congestion in the central business district of Shreveport, Louisiana, improving access to such district, ^. providing highway continuity, and satisfying national defense requirements by connecting an interstate route with another interstate route which serves as a bypass around such city. (10) MIAMI, FLORIDA.—The Secretary is authorized to carry out a highway project which will demonstrate the most cost effective method of improving interstate motor vehicle access for passengers and cargo moving to and from the port of Miami, Florida. (11) ARKANSAS-MISSOURI.— (A) BELLA VISTA, ARKANSAS.—The

> J)

Secretary is authorized to carry out a highway project in the State of Arkansas on a segment of a north-south highway on the Federal-aid primary system from the vicinity of the junction of Interstate Routes 1-40 and 1-540 to the boundary between the States of Arkansas and Missouri in the vicinity of Bella Vista, Arkansas, for the purpose of demonstrating methods of improving highway safety and of accelerating highway

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 101 Part 1.djvu/213

 PUBLIC LAW 100-17—APR. 2, 1987

101 STAT. 183

construction. Such project shall increase the number of lanes on such segment from 2 to 4. (B) CARTHAGE, MISSOURI.—The Secretary is authorized to carry out a highway project on a segment of a north-south highway on the Federal-aid primary system from the vicinity of Carthage, Missouri, to the boundary between the States of Arkansas and Missouri in the vicinity of Noel, Missouri, for the purpose of demonstrating methods of improving highway safety and accelerating highway construction. Such project shall increase the number of lanes on such segment from 2 to 4. (C)

DESIGN

FEATURES;

TECHNICAL

ASSISTANCE.—The

projects authorized by subparagraphs (A) and (B) of this paragraph shall also demonstrate the latest high-type geometric design features and new advances in highway traffic control and safety hardware. All design elements, including the highway pavement, shall be designed to provide the best life-cycle costs, thereby minimizing future maintenance costs. The Secretary shall provide necessary technical assistance in the design and construction of such projects. (12) SANFORD, FLORIDA.—The Secretary shall carry out a highway project to demonstrate methods of reducing costs and expediting construction of an interchange in the vicinity of Sanford, Florida, and the intersection of Route 46A and an interstate route by contracting with a private business to design and construct such project. (13) SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA.—The Secretary is authorized to

carry out a demonstration project in the vicinity of San Jose and Santa Clara, California, for the purpose of demonstrating a unified method of reducing traffic congestion on a Federal-aid urban highway which is the result of the intersection of such highway with 2 other Federal-aid urban highways and a railroad crossing in a Vi-mile segment of such highway. (14) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.— (A) PROJECT DESCRIPTION.—The

Secretary shall carry out a demonstration project in the vicinity of the C&O Canal in the District of Columbia for the purpose of substantially improving motor vehicle access at a major traffic generator without decreasing the efficiency of a Federal-aid primary highway. The Secretary shall enter into such arrangements as may be necessary to carry out such project with the Secretary of the Interior. (B) LIMITATION.—No Federal assistance shall be provided to carry out the demonstration project under this paragraph until private sources dedicate at least 2.5 acres of land as a scenic easement for project purposes. (15) COMPTON, CALIFORNIA.—The Secretary shall carry out a highway project for construction of a grade separation on a route on the Federal-aid urban system in Compton, California, for the purpose of demonstrating methods of relieving traffic congestion and enhancing economic development. (16) MODESTO, CALIFORNIA.—The Secretary shall carry out a highway project to demonstrate methods by which construction of a grade separation for a railroad crossing of a highway on the Federal-aid primary system enhances urban redevelopment and

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 101 Part 1.djvu/214

 lai STAT. 184

PUBLIC LAW 100-17—APR. 2, 1987 the effectiveness of a planned transportation center in Modesto, California. (17) COLUMBIA, MISSOURI.—The Secretary shall carry out a highway project for construction of 2 additional lanes on a 2lane 106-mile highway on the Federal-aid primary system which begins in the vicinity of Columbia, Missouri, and ends in the vicinity of Lancaster, Missouri, for the purpose of demonstrating methods of improving highway safety, reducing traffic congestion, and encouraging economic development. (18)

» 'j

' t

I ^

.

^ ^' " ^ K

EAST MILTON, MASSACHUSETTS.—The Secretary is

au-

thorized to carry out a highway project to demonstrate the advantages of joint development and use of air rights in the construction of a deck over a depressed portion of an interstate route in East Milton, Massachusetts. (19) FAIRHOPE, ALABAMA.—The Secretary, in cooperation with the State of Alabama, shall carry out a highway project in the vicinity of Fairhope and Foley, Alabama, to demonstrate methods of accelerating the widening of a highway traffic segment of highway on the Federal-aid primary system necessary for the rapid evacuation of individuals during emergency weather conditions. (20) WILDER, KENTUCKY.—The Secretary shall carry out a highway project in the vicinity of Wilder in Campbell County, Kentucky, to demonstrate the economic benefits to a port facility, industrial complex, and foreign trade zone and methods of enhancing highway safety by reconstruction of a segment of a highway on the Federal-aid urban system which connects an interstate route with a port facility. Such project shall increase the number of lanes on such highway from 2 to 4 and may include realignment of such highway. (21) J o DAVIESS, ILLINOIS.—The Secretary shall carry out a highway project to demonstrate the safety benefits of providing additional and improved vehicular passing opportunities on, adding truck climbing lanes to, and straightening, a 50-mile segment of an east-west highway on the Federal-aid primary system which carries a high volume of traffic in Jo Daviess and Stephenson Counties, Illinois. (22) ALLENTOWN, PENNSYLVANIA.—The Secretary is authorized to carry out a highway project in the city of Allentown, Pennsylvania, for the purpose of demonstrating methods of accelerating construction to eliminate a major rail-highway crossing at grade, reducing traffic delays for both rail and motor vehicle traffic, and minimizing the impact on the surrounding urban environment. (23) RIVERSIDE, CAUFORNIA.—The Secretary shall carry out a highway project to demonstrate methods of improving safety on a highway on the Federal-aid primary system in Riverside, California, which is designated as a priority primary route under section 147 of title 23, United States Code, by Committee Print Numbered 100-3 of the Committee on Public Works and Transportation of the House of Representatives. (24) BUFFALO, NEW YORK.—The Secretary shall carry out a highway project in Buffalo, New York, for the purpose of demonstrating methods of facilitating redevelopment of a waterfront area by construction of a connector ofi a highway on the Federal-aid primary system. Upon completion of the project, the connector shall be added to the Federal-aid urban system.

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 101 Part 1.djvu/215

 PUBLIC LAW 100-17—APR. 2, 1987 (25) CLEVELAND, OHIO.—The Secretary shall carry out a highway project to replace a ramp which provides access to an industrial area of Cleveland, Ohio, for the purpose of demonstrating the relationship between infrastructure improvement and economic vitality. (26) PATTON ISLAND, ALABAMA.—The Secretary shall carry out a highway project to construct a bridge to cross the Tennessee River in Lauderdale and Colbert Counties, Alabama, in the vicinity of Patton Island, Alabama, for the purpose of demonstrating methods of improving highway transportation and enhancing economic development. (27) WOOD COUNTY, OHIO.—The Secretary shall carry out a highway project to construct an interchange connecting Interstate Route 1-75 and a 4-lane, east-west highway in Perrysburg Township in Wood County, Ohio, for the purpose of demonstrating methods of reducing traffic congestion, improving traffic flow, and enhancing economic development. (28) CHICAGO, ILLINOIS.—The Secretary shall carry out the following highway projects in Chicago, Illinois: (A) A highway project to rehabilitate a drawbridge over the north branch of the Chicago River and realign an adjacent intersection which will demonstrate the use of the latest innovative bridge repair techniques on a bascule bridge. (B) A highway project to remove and replace an existing bridge on Lake Shore Drive in the Jackson Park Historic Landscape District and the Midway Plaissance with a new bridge in the same location and to widen the approach road to such bridge which will demonstrate the historic recreation of a national register bridge and replacement of a deteriorated bridge. (C) A highway project between Chicago Avenue and Claybourn Avenue to disinvest a bridge over Goose Island which will demonstrate methods of reducing municipal and Federal burdens for rehabilitation and maintenance of a surplus highway facility. (29) WAYNE COUNTY, MICHIGAN.—The Secretary shall carry out two road improvement projects in Wayne County, Michigan, to demonstrate the benefits of enhancing safety and improving economic vitality of a depressed area. (30) COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS.—

(A) CHICAGO.—The Secretary shall carry out a highway project which demonstrates methods of utilizing a low cost alternative to reconstruction of a 1-mile segment of an eastwest road between Nagle and Oak Park Avenues, Chicago, Illinois, which is deficient due to soil conditions. (B) SOUTHWEST CHICAGO.—The Secretary shall carry out a highway project to construct three parking facilities adjacent to the Rock Island commuter rail lines in Southwest Chicago, Illinois, which will demonstrate the effectiveness of construction of parking facilities in relieving on-street parking congestion and unsafe parking practices. (C) OAK LAWN.—The Secretary shall carry out a highway project in Oak Lawn, Illinois, which demonstrates methods of improving highway safety by widening and resurfacing a 4-lane major arterial with lane widths which are less than minimum State and Federal standards.

101 STAT. 185

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 101 Part 1.djvu/216

 101 STAT. 186

PUBLIC LAW 100-17—APR. 2, 1987

(D) CALUMET PARK.—The Secretary shall carry out a highway project which demonstrates methods of improving highway safety and access to a segment of the Interstate System by reconstruction of a congested major arterial in Calumet Park and Blue Island, Illinois. (E) CUMBERLAND STATION.—The Secretary shall carry out a highway project to construct the first level of a 2 level addition to an existing park and ride facility in the vicinity of Cumberland Station on the O'Hare Rapid Transit Line, Chicago, Illinois, which will demonstrate methods of reducing commuter traffic and traffic congestion and increasing utilization of available capacity on a rapid transit line. (F) ELEVATED ROAD.—The Secretary shall carry out a highway project to demonstrate the benefits of utilizing precast, prefabricated concrete structural segments in the reconstruction of an elevated road on a major artery in the southwestern portion of Chicago, Illinois, in order to mini1 mize traffic disruption during the reconstruction. (G) PARKING FACILITIES.—The Secretary shall carry out a demonstration project for the construction of two parking lots at sites (i) where future stations are to be located on the Southwest Rapid Transit Line in Chicago, Illinois, and (ii) to which buses now provide mass transit service. Such project shall be carried out before the beginning of service on such rapid transit line in order to demonstrate methods of facilitating the transfer of passengers between different modes of transportation and of establishing ridership before the opening of a rapid transit line. (31) KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI.—The Secretary shall carry out a J highway project on a north-south route on the Federal-aid primary system in Kansas City, Missouri, to demonstrate methods by which construction of the first and southern-most phase of a 5-phase highway project will facilitate construction of the full 5-phase project. Construction of the 5-phase project— (A) will connect the northern terminus of another route on the Federal-aid primary system and an east-west inter•.? state route, (B) will demonstrate the interrelationship between

construction of a major urban transportation artery and economic development initiatives in facilitating reinvestment in an urban area experiencing economic decay, and (C) will demonstrate methods of reducing traffic conges^ tion through construction of a roadway that is compatible > with adjacent residential neighborhoods and commercial areas. (32) MOUNT VERNON, KENTUCKY.—The Secretary is authorized to carry out a highway project on a segment of the Federal-aid primary system which connects Interstate Route 1-75 in the vicinity of Mount Vernon, Kentucky, with Kentucky State Route 80 in the vicinity of Shopville, Kentucky, for the purposes of demonstrating methods of improving highway safety and traffic flow and improving access to a national river and recreation area.

(33) PINE CITY, MINNESOTA.—The Secretary is authorized to

carry out a highway project in Pine City, Minnesota, to demonstrate methods of enhancing economic development and improving highway safety and traffic flow by construction of an

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 101 Part 1.djvu/217

 PUBLIC LAW 100-17—APR. 2, 1987

101 STAT. 187

interchange between a highway on the Interstate System and a county State-aid highway. (34) PASO ROBLES, CAUFORNIA.—The Secretary is authorized to carry out a highway project in the city of Paso Robles, California, to construct a 2-lane, east-west bridge which will span the Salinas River, a highway, and a railroad line and will be located south of the existing bridges spanning such river in such city, for the purposes of demonstrating methods of improving highway safety and traffic flow and enhancing economic development. (35) SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK.—The Secretary

is au-

thorized to carry out a highway project from Wheeler Road to Veterans Memorial Highway in the town of Islip, Suffolk County, New York, for the purpose of demonstrating construction techniques to accelerate upgrading of an existing highway to freeway standards with minimum disruption of traffic. (36) CONNECTICUT.—

(A) SouTHiNGTON.—The Secretary shall carry out a highway project to demonstrate the latest construction techniques in reconstructing a north-south segment of highway on the Federal-aid urban system in the vicinity of Southington, Connecticut. (B) KENT CENTER.—The Secretary shall carry out a highway project to change horizontal and vertical alignment of a north-south highway on the Federal-aid primary system south of Kent Center, Connecticut, to demonstrate methods of solving safety and flooding problems. (37) DOVER TOWNSHIP, NEW JERSEY.—The Secretary is au-

thorized to carry out a highway project to construct a bridge across the Toms River in the township of Dover, New Jersey, for the purpose of demonstrating methods of reducing traffic congestion on an existing bridge and facilitating the redevelopment of the central business district of such township. (38) LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CAUFORNIA.—The Secretary is au-

thorized to carry out a highway project in Los Angeles County, California, for the purpose of demonstrating methods of improving vehicular circulation related to the intermodal transportation of port-related traffic and alleviating congestion caused by increased port activities. (39) GREATER PITTSBURGH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT.—The Secretary shall carry out in the vicinity of the Greater Pittsburgh International Airport a highway project for construction of a highway which is designated as a priority primary route under section 147 of title 23, United States Code, by Committee Print Numbered 100-3 of the Committee on Public Works and Transportation of the House of Representatives to demonstrate methods of improving economic development and airport terminal placement. (40) STEUBEN COUNTY, NEW YORK.—The Secretary shall carry out a highway project in Steuben County, New York, for the purpose of demonstrating the extent to which the economy of an industrialized high unemployment area can be improved by completion of key elements of a modern, grade-separated access controlled highway which serves such area. (41) SONOMA AND MARIN COUNTIES, CAUFORNIA.—

(A) SANTA ROSA.—The Secretary shall carry out a highway project for the purpose of demonstrating the extent to

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 101 Part 1.djvu/218

 101 STAT. 188

PUBLIC LAW 100-17—APR. 2, 1987 t> I-

which traffic congestion is relieved by reconstruction of a north-south arterial which (i) connects Santa Rosa, California, and Petaluma, California, (ii) is parallel to a major north-south segment of the Federal-aid primary system, and (iii) serves as an alternative for traffic between such cities. (B) HEALDSBURG.—The Secretary shall carry out a highway project for the purpose of demonstrating the extent to 'H which traffic congestion is relieved on the major northsouth segment of the Federal-aid primary system described H in subparagraph (A) by construction of high occupancy vehicle lanes along a right-of-way which is parallel to such segment and connects San Rafael, California, and Healdsburg, California. (42) VoYAGEURS NATIONAL PARK, MINNESOTA.—The Secretary shall carry out a highway project which demonstrates methods of enhancing use of a national park and reducing traffic congestion by reconstruction of an access road to Voyageurs National Park, Minnesota. (43) SAVANNAH, GEORGIA.—The Secretary, in cooperation with the State of Georgia, shall carry out a highway project for replacing an existing functionally obsolete bridge across the Savannah River in Savannah, Georgia, with a modern, highlevel structure for the purpose of demonstrating methods of improving safety and the free flow of both vehicular and waterborne traffic including traffic related to national defense. (44) N E W SEWICKLY, PENNSYLVANIA.—The Secretary shall carry out a highway project to construct a 2-lane highway between the township of New Sewickly, Pennsylvania, and the borough of Conway, Pennsylvania, for the purpose of demonstrating methods of accommodating increasing truck traffic and improving highway safety. (45) CROYLE TOWNSHIP, PENNSYLVANIA.—The Secretary shall carry out a highway project to upgrade a 1.3-mile access road to the Johnstown Flood National Memorial in the vicinity of Croyle Township, Pennsylvania, for the purpose of demonstrating methods of improving public access to a flood memorial. (46) LAWRENCE, MASSACHUSETTS.—The Secretary shall carry out in Lawrence, Massachusetts, a highway project to demonstrate methods of enhancing the benefits of an economic rehabilitation project under construction by construction of a service road which provides access between Massachusetts Avenue and Merrimack Street substantially along an alignment located between the Shawsheen River and an interstate route. (47) LOUISIANA.—

(A) The Secretary shall carry out a highway project on the west bank of the Mississippi River in the vicinity of Port Allen, Louisiana, for the purpose of demonstrating methods by which— (i) the inclusion of a diamond interchange on the Interstate System, including ingress and egress ramps 2m'.^H t with an overpass, located between the existing Mississippi River Bridge access and an existing rural interchange; and '-\-,:n (ii) the connection and improvement of access to the ^ii?«^ Interstate System by means of approaches from a 2-

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 101 Part 1.djvu/219

 PUBLIC LAW 100-17—APR. 2, 1987 rng

lane highway and a parish road to such diamond interchange; will eliminate safety hazards and reduce heavy truck traffic congestion from the Mississippi River Bridge exit ramp on the Interstate System and the City of Port Allen and the Texas-Pacific Railroad crossing and improve conditions for access to the Port of Greater Baton Rouge and the Intracoastal Canal. (B) The Secretary shall carry out a highway project in the vicinity of Baton Rouge, Louisiana, for the purpose of demonstrating the benefits of reducing traffic congestion in the immediate vicinity of a split-diamond interchange which connects an east-west highway on the Interstate System, 2 4-lane highways not on such system, and a 2-lane highway not on such system by providing— (i) a direct exit lane from the westbound lanes of the highway on such system to one of such 4-lane highways; (li) a direct access ramp and acceleration lane from t such 4-lane highway to the eastbound lanes of the highway on such system; and (iii) a direct exit lane from the eastbound lanes of the highway on such system to the other of such 4-lane highways. (C) The Secretary shall carry out a highway project in the vicinity of northeast Baton Rouge, Louisiana, for the purpose of demonstrating the efficacy of reducing traffic congestion and improving traffic flow in the immediate vicinity of a highway on the Interstate System to connect such highway to a metropolitan airport terminal access road by construction of a direct access off-ramp link. (48) MiNDEN, LOUISIANA.—The Secretary shall carry out a highway project for the purpose of demonstrating methods of enhancing economic development by construction of a frontage road which provides Minden, Louisiana, alternative access to a highway immediately connecting to a highway on the Interstate System. (49) ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA.—The Secretary shall carry out a project for research, development, and implementation of a computerized transportation management system to assist the city of Anaheim, California, and adjoining jurisdictions in managing highway traffic congestion caused in part by an interstate route passing through an area of concentrated population and commercial development for the purpose of demonstrating the usefulness of such a system in reducing traffic congestion. (50) PINE BLUFF, ARKANSAS.—The Secretary shall carry out a highway bridge project at Lock and Dam 4 near Pine Bluff, Arkansas. (51) CLARKSVILLE, TENNESSEE.—The Secretary shall carry out a highway project to demonstrate methods of improving highway safety by making improvements to a road providing direct access from the Fort Campbell Military Reservation to the city of Clarksville, Tennessee. (52) CLARINDA, IOWA.—The Secretary shall carry out a highway project to reconstruct and rehabilitate a highway between Shenandoah and Clarinda, Iowa, for the purpose of demonstrating methods by which improved highway transportation in an

101 STAT. 189

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 101 Part 1.djvu/220

 101 STAT. 190

PUBLIC LAW 100-17—APR. 2, 1987 economically depressed rural area will increase economic activity in such area. (53) SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.—The Secretary shall carry out a highway project to expand a highway which connects an interstate route in the vicinity of Oceanside, California, with another interstate route in the vicinity of Escondido, California, for the purpose of demonstrating methods of reducing traffic congestion and accidents. (54) SAINT CHARLES COUNTY, MISSOURI.—The Secretary shall carry out a highway project to construct a bypass highway to connect an east-west interstate route in Saint Charles County, Missouri, with the interstate beltway around Saint Louis, Missouri, for the purpose of demonstrating methods of alleviating traffic congestion, especially commuter traffic congestion. (55) JoNESBORO, ARKANSAS.—The Secretary shall carry out a highway project for construction of 4 grade separations on a 4lane bypass route in the vicinity of Jonesboro, Arkansas, for the purpose of demonstrating methods of improving highway safety. r'

(56) ILLINOIS.— (A) MOUNT VERNON.—The Secretary is authorized to

carry out a highway project to reconstruct a segment of •fit approximately 1.4 miles of a State route connecting to an ' interstate route in the vicinity of Mount Vernon, Illinois, for the purpose of demonstrating methods of improving highway safety. (B) EVANSVILLE.—The Secretary is authorized to carry out a highway project to upgrade a principal route through the village of Evansville, Illinois, for the purpose of demonstrating methods of improving traffic flow. (C) UNION COUNTY.—The Secretary is authorized to carry out a highway project to improve a road leading to a ? landmark in the vicinity of the city of Alto Pass, Union County, Illinois, for the purpose of demonstrating methods of improving access to such a landmark and of enhancing "' tourism. (57) CONCORD, CALIFORNIA.—The Secretary shall carry out a highway project between Concord, California, and West Pittsburg, California, for the purpose of demonstrating methods of improving highway safety and traffic flow by lowering the grade of, realigning, and widening an existing highway on the Federal-aid primary system. (58) GEORGIA.—The Secretary shall carry out a highway project which demonstrates methods of improving highway safety and reducing traffic accidents by reconstruction of a 3.8-mile segment of highway between Interstate Route 1-285 and the fork of Georgia State Route 141 as a 6-lane controlled access freeway with one-way frontage roads in each direction. (59) PIKE COUNTY, KENTUCKY.—The Secretary shall carry out a highway project to reconstruct a highway on the Federal-aid primary system between Open Fork Road and Road Fork of Big Creek Road in Pike County, Kentucky, for the purpose of demonstrating methods of improving highway safety in a mountainous area. (60) MADISON COUNTY, ILUNOIS.—The Secretary shall carry out a highway project to demonstrate the economic growth and development benefits of reconstructing a segment of road in

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 101 Part 1.djvu/221

 PUBLIC LAW 100-17—APR. 2, 1987

101 STAT. 191

Madison County, Illinois, which serves a high-growth industrial area. (61) ERWIN, TENNESSEE.—The Secretary shall carry out a highway project to extend, approximately 15 miles, a highway on the Appalachian development highway system between River View in Erwin, Tennessee, and Sam's Gap on the North Carolina-Tennessee border for the purpose of demonstrating methods of improving transportation in a mountainous area. (62) N E W RIVER, WEST VIRGINIA.—The Secretary is authorized to carry out a demonstration project to construct a parkway connecting to an interstate route, in accordance with the recommendations of the New River Parkway Authority, in the vicinity of the New River, West Virginia, for the purpose of demonstrating benefits to recreation, tourism, and industrial, economic, and community development. (63) KITTANNING-BROOKVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA.—The Secretary

is authorized to carry out a project for reconstruction of approximately 30 miles of a 2-lane road on the Federal-aid primary system between Kittanning and Brookville, Pennsylvania, for the purpose of demonstrating cost-effective methods of improving rural highways to accommodate wider and longer trucks. (64) AURORA-HOYT LAKES, MINNESOTA.—The Secretary is au-

thorized to carry out a project for construction of a highway connecting Aurora-Hoyt Lakes and Silver Bay, Minnesota, for the purpose of demonstrating methods of reducing traffic congestion in and around a recreational area. (65) KANAWHA COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA.—The Secretary shall carry out a highway project which demonstrates methods of improving traffic flow in a rural area by reconstruction of the Chelyan Bridge in Kanawha County, West Virginia. (66) ROANOKE SOUND, NORTH CAROLINA.—The Secretary shall carry out a highway project which demonstrates methods of improving tourism, commercial enterprise, and water and highway transportation by construction of a bridge on an east-west Federal-aid primary route which connects Manteo and Whalebone, North Carolina, and traverses Roanoke Sound. (67) LINCOLN, ILLINOIS.—The Secretary shall carry out a highway project which demonstrates methods of improving highway safety and reducing traffic congestion by construction of a controlled access freeway which connects Interstate Route 1-55 in the vicinity of Lincoln, Illinois, and Interstate Route 1-74 in the vicinity of Morton, Illinois. (68) SPARKS, NEVADA.—The Secretary shall carry out a highway project which demonstrates methods of improving economic development and diversification, and eliminating traffic and highway safety hazards by construction in the city of Sparks, Nevada, of an interchange which connects Interstate Route 1-80 and Sparks Boulevard. (69) BURBANK-GLENDALE-PASADENA AIRPORT, CAUFORNIA.—The

Secretary shall carry out a highway project which demonstrates methods of coordinating construction of ground access to an airport and construction of terminal and parking facilities at such airport. The Secretary shall carry out such project at the Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport, California, by making a grant for construction of such ground access to the airport authority for such airport.

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 101 Part 1.djvu/222

 101 STAT. 192 f

PUBLIC LAW 100-17—APR. 2, 1987 (70) E L SEGUNDO, CAUFORNIA.—The Secretary shall carry out a highway project to increase the capacity of a tunnel in the vicinity of an airport serving El Segundo, California, which will demonstrate methods of mitigating increased traffic congestion which is projected to result from completion of a segment of the Interstate System. (71) ALAMEDA ISLAND, CAUFORNIA.—The Secretary shall carry out a highway project to demonstrate methods of improving access to, and alleviating congestion on, a north-south route designated as part of the Interstate System under section 139 of title 23, United States Code, and its access roads, including access roads from Oakland International Airport and Alameda Island, California, to such interstate route. (72) DOUGLAS COUNTY, KANSAS.—The Secretary shall carry out a highway project in Douglas County, Kansas, to demonstrate methods of reducing traffic congestion and facilitating the usage by motorists on the Interstate System of recreational facilities by construction of a north-south limited access trafficway of approximately 4 miles in length which will connect an east-west interstate route to a reservoir and a university research park. (73) CHADVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA.—The Secretary shall carry out a highway project to relocate and reconstruct to 4 lanes a 3.5-mile north-south segment of the Federal-aid primary system from the vicinity of Uniontown Bypass at Chadville, Pennsylvania, to Pennsylvania Legislative Route 26082 in the vicinity of Fairchance, Pennsylvania, which will demonstrate methods of enhancing the development of a major industrial site. (74) CHAMBERSBURG, PENNSYLVANIA.—The Secretary shall carry out a highway project which demonstrates how construction of an interchange on a north-south interstate route will provide access to Chambersburg, Pennsylvania, and relieve traffic congestion on an existing interchange on such interstate route. (75) BEAUMONT, TEXAS.—The Secretary shall carry out a highway project which demonstrates how construction of an overpass over an interstate route in the vicinity of the city of Beaumont, Texas, will relieve traffic congestion on such interstate route and provide direct access between the central business district of such city and another part of such city. (76) SAINT LOUIS COUNTY, MINNESOTA.—The Secretary shall carry out a highway project for the construction of an access road from County Road 413 in Saint Louis County, Minnesota, to a recreational complex on the Bois Forte Chippewa Reservation (Vermilion Sector) to demonstrate methods of providing jobs and enhancing economic development in a severely and chronically depressed area. (77) GLOUCESTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA.—The Secretary, in consultation with the Governor of Virginia, the Secretary of Defense, and the Secretary of the Interior, shall carry out site selection and environmental studies and design and engineering for replacement or expansion of a bridge connecting Gloucester County with York County and the cities of Newport News and Hampton, Virginia, for the purpose of demonstrating methods of facilitating the resolution of Federal intra-governmental conflicts. (78) BRAZORIA COUNTY, TEXAS.—The Secretary shall carry out a highway project in Brazoria County, Texas, to demonstrate

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 101 Part 1.djvu/223

 PUBLIC LAW 100-17—APR. 2, 1987

101 STAT. 193

how the extension of a State highway to connect with another State highway can relieve traffic congestion in Fort Bend County, Texas. (79) HAMMOND, INDIANA.—The Secretary shall enter into such arrangements as may be necessary to carry out a demonstration project in Hammond, Indiana, for the relocation of railroad lines for the purpose of eliminating railroad-highway grade crossings. If the city of Hammond, Indiana, elects to carry out all or any portion of the demonstration project authorized by this paragraph before the funds authorized to be appropriated to carry out this paragraph are made available, the Secretary shall reimburse with such funds the city for the costs of carrying out such project or portion. (80) ERIE COUNTY, NEW YORK.—The Secretary is authorized to carry out a highway project in Erie County, New York, to demonstrate methods of enhancing safety and reducing traffic congestion and delays at the terminus of an interstate route by relocating the terminus of such route. (81) TAMPA, FLORIDA.—The Secretary is authorized to carry out the remaining design work for a highway project for construction of a grade separation on a route on the Federal-aid primary system in the vicinity of Tampa, Florida, for the purpose of demonstrating methods of improving motor vehicle access between rapidly growing urban areas as well as relieving motor vehicle congestion resulting from the transportation of freight to and from areas for the transshipment of waterborne commerce. (82) POST FALLS, IDAHO.—The Secretary is authorized to carry out a project to reconstruct Seltice Way (former United States Route 10) to a multilane facility through the City of Post Falls, Idaho, beginning at Pleasant View Road and ending at Huetter Road. (83) BOISE, IDAHO.—The Secretary is authorized to carry out a project to construct a multilane highway of 6.5 miles, in Boise, Idaho, from the Curtis Road interchange to Broadway Avenue, including interchanges, intersections, bridges, elevated structures, and the Orchard Street connection to Chinden Boulevard. (84) LAFAYETTE-WEST LAFAYETTE, INDIANA.—The Secretary is

authorized to carry out— (A) acquisition of right-of-way, grading, and construction of ramps and a double span bridge to carry State Road 26 over the Wabash River connecting the cities of Lafayette and West Lafayette, Indiana; (B) acquisition of right-of-way, grading, construction of a 2.6-mile single track rail corridor, construction of a second rail span at the Wabash Avenue Overpass and transfer of Amtrak passenger services to a relocated depot facility at Second and Main Streets; and (C) acquisition of right-of-way, grading, construction of ramps and two rail corridor overpasses and associated Cf replacement street work to reconstruct the vehicular api proach to the east end of Harrison Bridge which carries United States Route 231 over the Wabash River connecting the cities of Lafayette and West Lafayette. (85) DUBUQUE-DEWITT, IOWA.—The Secretary is authorized to carry out a project which replaces the route from the intersection of United States Route 61 and Grandview Avenue in

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 101 Part 1.djvu/224

 101 STAT. 194

PUBLIC LAW 100-17—APR. 2, 1987 Dubuque, Iowa, extending northerly to a point near East 14th Street, and to improve the service level of the remaining connection from Interstate Route 1-80 to Dubuque extending from United States Route 30 at Dewitt to Grandview Avenue in Dubuque. (86) OLATHE, KANSAS.—The Secretary is authorized to carry out a project to construct an interchange at 119th Street and Interstate Route 1-35 in the City of Olathe, Kansas. (87) WEST CALCASIEU PARISH, LOUISIANA.—The Secretary is

authorized to carry out a project to provide for an access road which parallels Interstate Route I-IO at Sulphur, Louisiana, in West Calcasieu Parish, in order to provide access to and from the Interstate System and access from Louisiana Highway 108 to Louisiana Highway 3077. (88) SOUTHEAST BATON ROUGE, LOUISIANA.—The Secretary is

authorized to carry out a project in southeast Baton Rouge, Louisiana, to widen off- and on-ramps of an interstate route interchange; to widen and improve approaches on both sides of the Interstate System of a 2-lane highway, including access ramps and turnouts; to construct a schoolbus loading area adjacent thereto; and to coordinate a partial relocation of a 2lane highway not on such system. (89) EAST LAFAYETTE, LOUISIANA.—The Secretary is authorized to carry out a project to construct an access road to Interstate Route I-IO from Louisiana Highway 354 in East Lafayette, Louisiana. (90) EAST LAFAYETTE, LOUISIANA.—The Secretary is authorized to carry out a project to construct a full-diamond interchange to connect Louisiana Avenue to Interstate Route I-IO in East Lafayette, Louisiana. (91) BRUNSWICK, MAINE.—The Secretary is authorized to carry out a project to construct the Brunswick-Topsham Bypass in Maine. The bypass will be a new limited access highway which will run from the vicinity of the interchange of Interstate Route 1-95 and State Route 196 in Topsham, cross the Androscoggin River, and connect with United States Route 1 in Brunswick, Maine. (92) UNITED STATES ROUTE 48, MARYLAND.—The Secretary is

authorized to carry out a project on United States Route 48 in Washington County, Maryland, to construct an eastbound ramp to United States Route 40 and a westbound access road from Mountain Road. (93) MARYLAND ROUTE 162.—The Secretary is authorized to carry out a project to realign an intersection to tie Maryland Route 162 directly into Poplar Avenue. Such project includes— (A) construction of additional lanes at the intersection to •;i; allow northbound Maryland Route 162 to westbound Poplar Avenue to become a through movement; (B) widening 2 miles of Maryland Route 162 from Poplar Avenue to Maryland Route 176 to 4 lanes; and (C) widening Va-mile of Poplar Avenue from Maryland Route 170 to Maryland Route 162 to 4 lanes. (94) ROUTE 4, MARYLAND.—The Secretary is authorized to

carry out a project to replace a bridge carrying Maryland Route 4 over the Patuxent River.

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 101 Part 1.djvu/225

 PUBLIC LAW 100-17—APR. 2, 1987

101 STAT. 195

(95) ROUTE 3, MARYLAND.—The Secretary is authorized to

carry out a project to construct an interchange to connect Maryland Route 3 and Belair Drive. (96) ROUTE 197, MARYLAND.—The Secretary is authorized to

carry out a project to construct a 4-lane divided highway to bypass Bowie, Maryland, from Rustic Hill Drive to south of the Amtrak line in Prince Georges County. (97) MARYLAND ROUTE II5.—The Secretary is authorized to carry out a project to relocate Maryland Route 115 from Montgomery Village Avenue to Shady Grove Road, Montgomery County. This project involves the construction of a 4-lane divided highway. (98) MARYLAND ROUTE 213.—The Secretary is authorized to carry out a project to rehabilitate the Chester River Bridge on Maryland Route 213 at Chestertown, Maryland. (99) MARYLAND ROUTE 838.—The Secretary is authorized to carry out a project to replace a bridge connecting Maryland Route 838 to the Wye Island natural resources management area. (100) BELCHERTOWN, MASSACHUSETTS.—The Secretary is au-

thorized to carry out a project to construct a road of approximately 3,600 feet between Liberty Street and Massachusetts Route 21 in Belchertown, Massachusetts. (101) MICHIGAN.—The Secretary is authorized to carry out— (A) a project for construction of the United States Route 31 freeway in Mason County, Michigan, from the south county line northward 11.1 miles to United States Route 10; (B) improvements, including road widening and resurfacing to existing United States Routes 10 and 31 from the United States Route 10-United States Route 31 interchange east to Scotville, Michigan; and (C) improvements on United States Route 31 from Scotville north seventeen miles to Preuss Road in Manistee County, Michigan. (102) BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA.—The Secretary is authorized to carry out a project for the design and site location for the replacement of the Bloomington Ferry Bridge, located in Hennepin and Scott Counties, Minnesota. (103) N E W AUGUSTA, MISSISSIPPI.—The Secretary is authorized to carry out a project to widen 14.7 miles of United States Highway 98 from 1.5 miles east of United States Highway 49 in Forrest County, east to State Route 29 in New Augusta, Mississippi. (104) HIGHWAY 30, NEBRASKA.—The Secretary is authorized to carry out a project to replace the bridge that carries Highway 30 over the Missouri River between Blair, Nebraska and Missouri Valley, Iowa. (105) LAS VEGAS, NEVADA.—The Secretary is authorized to carry out a project to construct an interchange at Sahara Avenue and Interstate Route 1-15, in the city of Las Vegas, Nevada. (106) HENDERSON, NEVADA.—The Secretary is authorized to carry out a project to improve the Boulder Highway in Henderson, Nevada The project involves 6.36 miles along United States Route 93/95 from the intersection of Sunset Road to the intersection of Horizon Drive.

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 101 Part 1.djvu/226

 101 STAT. 196

PUBLIC LAW 100-17—APR. 2, 1987 (107) Los ALAMOS-SANTA FE, NEW MEXICO.—The Secretary is authorized to carry out a project for a new route from Los Alamos, New Mexico to Santa Fe, New Mexico. (108) LONG ISLAND EXPRESSWAY, NEW YORK.—The Secretary is

authorized to carry out a study to examine the feasibility of adding a fourth lane in each direction on Interstate Route 1-495 in New York. (109) NASSAU EXPRESSWAY, NEW YORK.—The Secretary is au-

thorized to carry out a project to extend the Nassau Expressway from Burnside Avenue to Broadway in New York. (110) WESTCHESTER PARKWAY, NEW YORK.—The Secretary is

authorized to carry out a project on the Westchester Parkway, New York, to widen the segment between the Hawthorne Interchange and Washburn Road, reconstruct the southbound lanes in the vicinity of Pleasantville Road, and reconstruct the Pleasantville Road Interchange. ?'^

(111) NORTH DAKOTA.—The Secretary is authorized to carry

out the following projects on access highways to public recreation areas on certain lakes and State parks in North Dakota in order to accommodate present and projected traffic density: (A) MORTON COUNTY.—The Secretary is authorized to carry out a project for bridge replacement and access road to Sweetbriar and Crown Butte Lakes, North Dakota. (B) MERCER COUNTY.—The Secretary is authorized to carry out a project to construct an access road in Mercer County, County FAS Route 2927 from 4 miles north of Hazen, North Dakota north 8 miles to Hazen Bay, Lake '^•^ Sakakawea. ^' (C) RANSOM COUNTY.—The Secretary is authorized to carry out a project to construct an access road in Ransom County, County FAS Route 3705 from State Highway 46, south 17 miles to State Highway 27 and a 1-mile spur to mo Fort Ransom State Park. tjaJamBi

(D) BENSON AND RAMSEY COUNTIES.—The Secretary is au-

thorized to carry out a project to construct an access road in b«s Benson and Ramsey Counties FAS Route 0322 from United ->fi« States Route 281 at Minnewaukan, east to Tri-County Park, iti north to State Highway 19. (E) MOUNTRAIL COUNTY.—The Secretary is authorized to hs>* carry out a project to construct an access road in Mountrail County from Parshall west 10 miles to Parshall Bay on Lake Sakakawea. ,t>iai;^ (F) EMMONS COUNTY.—The Secretary is authorized to carry out a project to construct an access road in Emmons oi I County FAS Route 1503 from Beaver Bay 13 miles west of YjBv Linton, south 23 miles to the South Dakota State line. -iflM r • (G) MCKENZIE COUNTY.—The Secretary is authorized to carry out a project to construct an access road in McKenzie ot County from Charleson south and east 8 miles to Lake tn^i. Sakakawea. ,8iigaV

(H) GRAND FORKS COUNTY.—The Secretary is authorized

to carry out a project to construct an access road in Grand Forks County from 1 mile east of Larimore, north 5 miles to Larimore Dam recreation area.

oi

(I) GRAND FORKS COUNTY.—The Secretary is authorized to

i

carry out a project to construct an access road in Grand Forks County from County Road 19, 4 miles south of

i^ifl E.J0,ft- 'f om -sn

�


text:
Page:A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field.pdf/40

498 If the medium in the field is a perfect dielectric there is no true conduction, and the currents $$p', q', r'$$ are only variations in the electric displacement, or, by the equations of Total Currents (A),

But these electric displacements are caused by electromotive forces, and by the equations of Electric Elasticity (E),

These electromotive forces are due to the variations either of the electromagnetic or the electrostatic functions, as there is no motion of conductors in the field; so that the equations of electromotive force (D) are

{{MathForm2|(67)|$$\left.\begin{array}{l} P=-\frac{dF}{dt}-\frac{d\Psi}{dx},\\ \\Q=-\frac{dG}{dt}-\frac{d\Psi}{dy},\\ \\R=-\frac{dH}{dt}-\frac{d\Psi}{dz}.\end{array}\right\} $$}}

(94) Combining these equations, we obtain the following: –

{{MathForm2|(68)|$$\left.\begin{array}{l} k\left(\frac{dJ}{dx}-\nabla^{2}F\right)+4\pi\mu\left(\frac{d^{2}F}{dt^{2}}+\frac{d^{2}\Psi}{dxdt}\right)=0,\\ \\k\left(\frac{dJ}{dy}-\nabla^{2}G\right)+4\pi\mu\left(\frac{d^{2}G}{dt^{2}}+\frac{d^{2}\Psi}{dydt}\right)=0,\\ \\k\left(\frac{dJ}{dy}-\nabla^{2}H\right)+4\pi\mu\left(\frac{d^{2}H}{dt^{2}}+\frac{d^{2}\Psi}{dzdt}\right)=0.\end{array}\right\} $$}}

If we differentiate the third of these equations with respect to $$y$$, and the second with respect to $$z$$, and subtract, J and $$\Psi$$ disappear, and by remembering the equations (B) of magnetic force, the results may be written

{{MathForm2|(69)|$$\left.\begin{array}{l} k\nabla^{2}\mu\alpha=4\pi\mu\frac{d^{2}}{dt^{2}}\mu\alpha,\\ \\k\nabla^{2}\mu\beta=4\pi\mu\frac{d^{2}}{dt^{2}}\mu\beta,\\ \\k\nabla^{2}\mu\gamma=4\pi\mu\frac{d^{2}}{d^{2}t}\mu\gamma.\end{array}\right\} $$}}

(95) If we assume that $$\alpha,\beta,\gamma$$ are functions of $$lx+my+nz-Vt=w$$, the first equation become

or

The other equations give the same value for V, so that the wave is propagated in either direction with a velocity V.


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 101 Part 1.djvu/227

 PUBLIC LAW 100-17—APR. 2, 1987

101 STAT. 197

f-?ii!C - Fordville, east and south 9 miles to Fordville Dam recre'' ation area. (J) STEELE COUNTY.—The Secretary is authorized to carry out a project to construct an access road in Steele County State Highway 200, 9 miles east of Finley, north 9 miles to the Golden Lake recreation area. (K) MCKENZIE COUNTY.—The Secretary is authorized to carry out a project to construct an access road in McKenzie County from United States Route 85 south of Williston, east 4.2 miles to several bays on Lake Sakakawea. (L) BOTTINEAU AND RENVIIXE COUNTIES.—The Secretary is authorized to carry out a project to construct an access road in Bottineau and Renville Counties, FAS Routes 3828 and 0526 from Lake Darling 1 mile west of Grano, east 10 miles. (M) MOUNTRAIL COUNTY.—The Secretary is authorized to carry out a project to construct an access road in Mountrail County, FAS Route 3123 from State Highway 23, 6 miles east of Newtown, south 2.5 miles to Van Hook Bay on Lake Sakakawea. (112) GLADSTONE, NORTH DAKOTA.—The Secretary

is

au-

thorized to carry out a project to improve access to a regional grain elevator, FAS Routes 2117 and 4531 from State Highway ii/i(21 at Regent, north 34 miles to Gladstone and Interstate Route 1-94, Gladstone, North Dakota. noi (113) ELIGENE, OREGON.—The Secretary is authorized to carry out a preliminary engineering study to plan and design alternatives to the Ferry Street Bridge in Eugene, Oregon. (114) PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND.—The

Secretary

is

au-

thorized to carry out a project for United States Route 1 in Providence, Rhode Island, to make improvements on Aliens Avenue and Eddy Street to add a center turning lane, widen the road, provide for shoulders, and improve safety on approximately 3 miles of road. (115) WEST WARWICK, RHODE ISLAND.—The Secretary is au-

thorized to carry out a project on Wakefield Street in West Warwick, Rhode Island, to improve pavement surfaces, curbs, and sidewalks, to add drainage facilities, and to widen approximately 3.5 miles of such street. (116) MYRTLE BEACH, SOUTH CAROUNA.—The Secretary is au-

thorized to carry out a project to construct a new controlled access road from Interstate Route 1-95 at Florence, South Carolina to United States Route 17, north of Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, including a connector from northwest of Conway, South Carolina, to United States Route 17, south of Myrtle Beach. (117) KEYSTONE, SOUTH DAKOTA.—The Secretary is authorized to carry out a project to construct an additional lane on South Dakota Route 244 from Mount Rushmore National Memorial to the vicinity of Keystone. (118) WEST TODD COUNTY, SOUTH DAKOTA.—The Secretary is

authorized to carry out a project for grading and interim surfacing of United States Route 18 in South Dakota from the West Todd County line, east. (119) IROQUOIS-DE SMET, SOUTH DAKOTA.—The Secretary is au-

thorized to carry out a project for grading and resurfacing United States Route 14 in South Dakota from Iroquois to De Smet.

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 101 Part 1.djvu/228

 101 STAT. 198

PUBLIC LAW 100-17—APR. 2, 1987

^.

^ f

(120) DALLAS, TEXAS.—The Secretary is authorized to carry out a project to construct and upgrade 8.1 miles from Beltline Road in Dallas County to SR-121 in Collin County. (121) BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY, VIRGINIA.—The Secretary is

au-

thorized to carry out a 10-mile extension of the Blue Ridge Parkway to the Explore Project (a tourist destination located in the Roanoke Valley in western Virginia to be designed and built by the National Park Service and to be transferred to and maintained by the Blue Ridge Parkway portion of the National Park Service).

! (b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FROM HIGHWAY TRUST ^

FUND.—There is authorized to be appropriated, out of the Highway Trust Fund (other than the Mass Transit Account) per fiscal year for each of fiscal years 1987, 1988, 1989, 1990, and 1991 to carry out— (1) subsection (a)(1) $5,000,000; (2) subsection (a)(2) $2,000,000; ^. (3) subsection (a)(3) $1,100,000; ®^^ ' (4) subsection (a)(4) $850,000; • -(5) subsection (a)(5) $500,000;
 * (6) subsection (a)(6) $550,000;

(7) subsection (a)(7) $2,900,000; I, (8) subsection (a)(8) $9,000,000; • (9) preliminary engineering and design under subsection (a)(9) $600,000; ^ (10) preliminary engineering and design under subsection (a)(10) $1,030,000; (11)(A) preliminary engineering and design, utility relocation, land acquisition, and initial construction under subsection (a)(ll)(A) $4,500,000; and I (B) preliminary engineering and design, utility relocation, '' land acquisition, and initial construction under subsection "' (a)(ll)(B) $4,500,000; (12) subsection (a)(12) $1,400,000; '^ (13) subsection (a)(13) $2,900,000; --'" ^' (14) subsection (a)(14) $800,000; ' '': (15) subsection (a)(15) $750,000; ''^ (16) subsection (a)(16) $1,300,000; (17) preliminary engineering and design, utility relocation, j" land acquisition, and initial construction under subsection ^' (a)(17) $1,100,000; (18) subsection (a)(18) $350,000; ^' (19) subsection (a)(19) $2,100,000; (20) subsection (a)(20) $900,000; r - " (21) subsection (a)(21) $300,000; - " •'''• ' fi-'i.Htsej (22) subsection (a)(22) $600,000; pi^ (23) subsection (a)(23) $800,000; " "• '" ' (24) subsection (a)(24) $1,250,000; (25) subsection (a)(25) $800,000; M (26) subsection (a)(26) $1,500,000; m (27) subsection (a)(27) $2,000,000; (28) subsection (a)(28) $1,200,000; k (29) subsection (a)(29) $220,000; (30) subsection (a)(30) $1,208,000; (31) subsection (a)(31) $1,500,000; (32) subsection (a)(32) $1,400,000; • ^A. (33) subsection (a)(33) $260,000; • (34) subsection (a)(34) $310,000;

�


text:
Page:A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field.pdf/41

Rh This wave consists entirely of magnetic disturbances, the direction of magnetization being in the plane of the wave. No magnetic disturbance whose direction of magnetization is not in the plane of the wave can be propagated as a plane wave at all.

Hence magnetic disturbances propagated through the electromagnetic field agree with light in this, that the disturbance at any point is transverse to the direction of propagation, and such waves may have all the properties of polarized light.

(96) The only medium in which experiments have been made to determine the value of $$k$$ is air, in which $$\mu=1$$, and therefore, by equation (46),

By the electromagnetic experiments of MM. and  ,

$v$ = 310,740,000 metres per second

is the number of electrostatic units in one electromagnetic unit of electricity, and this, according to our result, should be equal to the velocity of light in air or vacuum.

The velocity of light in air, by M. 's experiments, is

V = 314,858,000;

according to the more accurate experiments of M.

V = 298,000,000.

The velocity of light in the space surrounding the earth, deduced from the coefficient of aberration and the received value of the radius of the earth's orbit, is

V = 308,000,000.

(97) Hence the velocity of light deduced from experiment agrees sufficiently well with the value of $$v$$ deduced from the only set of experiments we as yet possess. The value of $$v$$ was determined by measuring the electromotive force with which a condenser of known capacity was charged, and then discharging the condenser through a galvanometer, so as to measure the quantity of electricity in it in electromagnetic measure. The only use made of light in the experiment was to see the instruments. The value of V found by M. was obtained by determining the angle through which a revolving mirror turned, while the light reflected from it went and returned along a measured course. No use whatever was made of electricity or magnetism.

The agreement of the results seems to show that light and magnetism are affections of the same substance, and that light is an electromagnetic disturbance propagated through the field according to electromagnetic laws.

(98) Let us now go back upon the equations in (94), in which the quantities J and $$\Psi$$ occur, to see whether any other kind of disturbance can be propagated through the medium depending on these quantities which disappeared from the final equations.


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 101 Part 1.djvu/229

 PUBLIC LAW 100-17—APR. 2, 1987

101 STAT. 199

(35) subsection (a)(35) $975,000; (36) subsection (a)(36) $385,000; (37) subsection (a)(37) $200,000; (38) subsection (a)(38) $7,400,000; (39) preliminary engineering and design under subsection (a)(39) $550,000; (40) subsection (a)(40) $800,000; (41)(A) subsection (a)(4r) $1,050,000; and (B) land acquisition under subsection (a)(41)(B) $2,400,000; (42) subsection (a)(42) $453,000; (43) subsection (a)(43) $6,650,000; (44) subsection (a)(44) $1,340,000; (45) subsection (a)(45) $72,000; (46) subsection (a)(46) $400,000; (47) subsection (a)(47) $1,080,000; (48) subsection (a)(48) $75,000; (49) subsection (a)(49) $90,000; (50) subsection (a)(50) $200,000; (51) subsection {a)(51) $500,000; (52) subsection (a)(52) $900,000; (53) subsection (a)(53) $1,880,000; (54) preliminary engineering and design under subsection (a)(54) $1,300,000; (55) subsection (a)(55) $1,230,000; (56) subsection (a)(56) $195,800; (57) land acquisition under subsection (a)(57) $400,000; (58) subsection (a)(58) $2,500,000; (59) subsection (a)(59) $1,500,000; (60) subsection (a)(60) $220,000; (61) subsection (a)(61) $2,000,000; (62) subsection (a)(62) $1,760,000; (63) subsection (a)(63) $1,000,000; (64) preliminary engineering and design under subsection (a)(64) $150,000; (65) preliminary engineering and design under subsection (a)(65) $200,000; (66) subsection (a)(66) $1,800,000; (67) subsection (a)(67) $3,400,000; (68) subsection (a)(68) $1,170,000; (69) subsection (a)(69) $600,000; (70) preliminary engineering and design under subsection (a)(70) $300,000; (71) preliminary engineering and design, environmental analysis, and implementation of environmental mitigation measures under subsection (a)(71) $800,000; (72) subsection (a)(72) $900,000; (73) subsection (a)(73) $900,000; (74) subsection (a)(74) $500,000; (75) subsection (a)(75) $600,000; (76) subsection (a)(76) $100,000; (77) subsection (a)(77) $400,000; (78) subsection (a)(78) $300,000; a) (79) subsection (a)(79) $563,000; (80) subsection (a)(80) $800,000; (81) subsection (a)(81) $1,370,000; (82) subsection (a)(82) $1,800,000; (83) subsection (a)(83) $500,000;

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 101 Part 1.djvu/230

 101 STAT. 200

PUBLIC LAW 100-17—APR. 2, 1987

0C

tiV

£t(^

m

tm.

(84) subsection (a)(84) $4,000,000; (85) subsection (a)(85) $4,000,000; (86) subsection (a)(86) $2,600,000; (87) subsection (a)(87) $590,000; (88) subsection (a)(88) $520,000; >, -^ (89) subsection (a)(89) $250,000; (90) subsection (a)(90) $250,000; (91) subsection (a)(91) $3,000,000; (92) subsection (a)(92) $56,000; (93) subsection (a)(93) $310,000; (94) subsection (a)(94) $258,000; (95) subsection (a)(95) $862,000; (96) subsection (a)(96) $540,000; (97) subsection (a)(97) $856,000; (98) subsection (a)(98) $398,000; (99) subsection (a)(99) $260,000; (100) subsection (a)(100) $100,000; (101) subsection (a)(101) $4,000,000; (102) subsection (a)(102) $3,240,000; (103) subsection (a)(103) $2,058,000; (104) subsection (a)(104) $540,000; (105) subsection (a)(105) $900,000; (106) subsection (a)(106) $600,000; (107) subsection (a)(107) $4,000,000; (108) subsection (a)(108) $200,000; (109) subsection (a)(109) $600,000; (110) subsection (a)(110) $800,000; (111)(A) subsection (a)(lll)(A) $180,000; (B) subsection (a)(lll)(B) $120,000; (C) subsection (a)(lll)(C) $300,000; (D) subsection (a)(lll)(D) $370,000; (E) subsection (a)(lllXE) $280,000; (F) subsection (a)(l 1IXF) $590,000; (G) subsection (a)(lll)(G) $80,000;,,.,,.: (H) subsection (a)(lllXH) $80,000; " ' (I) subsection (a)(UDd) $100,000; -^v,,,. (J) subsection (a)(lll)(J) $160,000; (K) subsection (a)(lUXK) $80,000; (L) subsection (a)(lUXL) $160,000; and (M) subsection (a)(lllXM) $60,000; (112) subsection (a)(112) $810,000; (113) subsection (a)(113) $250,000; (114) subsection (a)(114) $400,000; (115) subsection (a)(115) $380,000; (116) subsection (a)(116) $4,000,000; (117) subsection (a)(117) $300,000; (118) subsection (a)(118) $930,000; (119) subsection (a)(119) $754,000; (120) subsection (a)(120) $4,000,000; and (121) subsection (a)(121) $1,500,000.

,n)

j

• .i

(c) MINIMUM ALX-OCATION.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—If the total amount authorized for projects in a State in a fiscal year under subsection (b) is less than $829,060, the Secretary shall allocate an additional amount to such State for such fiscal year. The additional amount shall be an amount which, when added to the total amount authorized for projects

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 101 Part 1.djvu/231

 PUBLIC LAW 100-17—APR. 2, 1987

101 STAT. 201

in such State for such fiscal year under subsection (b), equals $829,060. (2) USE OF FUNDS.—Subject to subsections (d) and (e), amounts allocated under paragraph (1) shall be available to a State to carry out any project on a Federal-aid system. (3) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is authorized to be appropriated out of the Highway Trust Fund (other than the Mass Transit Account) $12,200,000 per fiscal year for each of fiscal years 1987, 1988, 1989, 1990, and 1991 to carry out this subsection. (d) AMOUNTS AVAILABLE FROM DISCRETIONARY FUNDS.— (1) DETERMINATION OF AMOUNT FOR EACH PROJECT.—For

» « '

each project authorized by subsection (a), the Secretary shall make available in any fiscal year an amount equal to 60 percent of the amount authorized for such project for such fiscal year by subsection (b). For each project constructed by a State with funds allocated under subsection (c), the Secretary shall make available to such State for such project an amount equal to 60 percent of the amount of such funds used for such project. (2)

AMOUNTS DERIVED FROM

DISCRETIONARY FUNDS.—The

amounts required to carry out paragraph (1) shall be derived from the discretionary funds described in paragraph (3). For amount equal to— (A) the total required to carry out paragraph (1) for such ^ fiscal year, multiplied by I (B) a fraction, the numerator of which is the amount available to be distributed at the discretion of the Secretary i for such fiscal year from such discretionary fund, and the '".. denominator of which is the amount available to be distribi[ uted at the discretion of the Secretary for such fiscal year 1 from all such discretionary funds. " (3) DISCRETIONARY FUNDS.—The discretionary funds referred to in paragraph (2) are the funds available to be distributed at the discretion of the Secretary under— (A) section 103(e)(4) of title 23, United States Code, for highway assistance projects; J,, (B) section 118(b) of such title; J (C) section 118(c) of such title; and xr (D) section 144(g) of such title; r except that such discretionary funds shall not include the funds v available under section 118(b) of such title in fiscal year 1987. (4) APPLICABILITY OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS.—A provision of title ^^ 23, United States Code, shall only apply to amounts to be o obligated under this subsection to the extent that the Secretary this section. 5 (e) STATE SHARE.— (1) GENERAL RULE.—A
 * each of fiscal years 1987, 1988, 1989, 1990, and 1991, the Secretary shall reserve from each such discretionary fund an
 * r determines that application of such provision is consistent with

State in which a project authorized by subsection (a) is located, or which constructs a project with funds received under an allocation under subsection (c), shall provide for such project an amount equal to 40 percent of the amount authorized for such project or the amount provided for such project from such allocation. Such amount shall be provided from non-Federal sources.

Ante, p. 150. Ante, p. 161.

�


text:
Page:A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field.pdf/42

502 If we determine $$\chi$$ from the equation

and F', G', H' from the equations

then

and the equations in (94) become of the form

Differentiating the three equations with respect to $$x, y$$, and $$z$$, and adding, we find that

and that

{{MathForm2|(78)|$$\left.\begin{array}{l} k\nabla^{2}F'=4\pi\mu\frac{d^{2}F}{dt^{2}},\\ \\k\nabla^{2}G'=4\pi\mu\frac{d^{2}G'}{dt^{2}},\\ \\k\nabla^{2}H'=4\pi\mu\frac{d^{2}H'}{dt^{2}}.\end{array}\right\} $$}}

Hence the disturbances indicated by F', G', H' are propagated with the velocity $$V=\sqrt{\tfrac{k}{4\pi\mu}}$$ through the field: and since

$\frac{dF'}{dx}+\frac{dG'}{dy}+\frac{dH'}{dz}=0$

the resultant of these disturbances is in the plane of the wave.

(99) The remaining part of the total disturbances F, G, H being the part depending on $$\chi$$ is subject to no condition except that expressed in the equation

If we perform the operation $$\nabla^{2}$$ on this equation, it becomes

Since the medium is a perfect insulator, $$e$$, the free electricity, is immoveable, and therefore $$\tfrac{dJ}{dt}$$ is a function of $$x, y, z$$, and the value of J is either constant or zero, or uniformly increasing or diminishing with the time; so that no disturbance depending on J can be propagated as a wave.

(100) The equations of the electromagnetic field, deduced from purely experimental evidence, show that transversal vibrations only can be propagated. If we were to go beyond our experimental knowledge and to assign a definite density to a substance which


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 101 Part 1.djvu/232

 101 STAT. 202

PUBLIC LAW 100-17—APR. 2, 1987 (2) LOCAL GOVERNMENT OPTION.—Any portion of the State share under this subsection and subsection (f) may be provided by a political subdivision of the State, at the election of such political subdivision. (f) ADDITIONAL FUNDS.— (1) GENERAL RULE.—If

amounts provided under subsections (b), (c), (d), and (e) of this section are not sufficient to complete a project authorized by subsection (a), a State may use any funds apportioned or allocated to the State for Federal-aid highways (other than interstate construction, highway-railway crossings, and hazard elimination funds) and any State funds to complete such project. (2) FEDERAL SHARE.—If Federal-aid highway funds are used to complete a project pursuant to this subsection, the use of such funds shall be subject to the appropriate Federal share applicable with respect to such class of funds under title 23, United States Code. (g) DELEGATION TO STATES.—Subject to the provisions of title 23, United States Code, the Secretary shall delegate responsibility for construction of a project or projects under this section (other than subsection (k)) to the State in which such project or projects are located upon request of such State. (h) ADVANCE CONSTRUCTION.—When a State which has been delegated responsibility for construction of a project under this section (other than subsection (k))— (1) has obligated all funds allocated under this section for '"^^ construction of such project; and (2) proceeds to construct such project without the aid of Federal funds in accordance with all procedures and all requirements applicable to such project, except insofar as such procedures and requirements limit the State to the construction of projects with the aid of Federal funds previously allocated to it; the Secretary, upon the approval of the application of a State, shall pay to the State the Federal share of the cost of construction of the project when additional funds are allocated for such project under this section. (i) APPLICABILITY OP TITLE 23.—Funds authorized by this section shall be available for obligation in the same manner as if such funds 23 USC 101 et were apportioned under chapter 1 of title 23, United States Code, seq. except that the Federal share of the cost of any project under this section shall be determined in accordance with this section and such u?, n/- funds shall remain available until expended. Funds authorized by subsections (b) and (c) shall not be subject to any obligation limitation. (j) REPORTS.— (1) STATUS REPORTS.—Not

later than January 31 of calendar years 1988, 1989, 1990, and 1991, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the status of the projects authorized by this section. (2) PASSAIC COUNTY, NEW JERSEY.—Not later than 180 days after completion of the demonstration project under subsection (a)(D, the Secretary shall submit a report to Congress on the results of such project (including the timesavings), along with a description of the procedures used to accelerate design and construction of such project, a summary of the manner in which the techniques used in carrying out such project in an urban area differed from the techniques used in the demonstration

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 101 Part 1.djvu/233

 PUBLIC LAW 100-17—APR. 2, 1987

101 STAT. 203

project carried out under section 141 of the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1976 in a rural area, and an analysis of the costs and 23 USC 124 note. benefits of the accelerated completion of the project conducted under such paragraph (1). (3) ALTOONA, PENNSYLVANIA.—Not later than 1 year, 6 years, Reports. and 11 years after the completion of the state of the art delineation technology project under subsection (a)(8), the Secretary shall submit reports to the Congress, including but not limited
 * .j to the results of such project, the effects of using the best

delineation technology on safety and other considerations, recommendations for applying the results to other highway projects, and any changes that may be necessary by law to permit further use of such delineation techniques. (4) ARKANSAS-MISSOURI.—Not later than 1 year, 6 years, and Reports. 11 years after the completion of the projects under subsection (a)(ll), the Secretary shall submit reports to the Congress, including but not limited to the results of such projects, the effects of using design features and advances described in such paragraph on safety and other considerations, recommendations for applying the results to other highway projects, and any changes that may be necessary by law to permit further use of such features and advances. (5) LIMITATION ON FUNDING.—The cost of any reports required by this subsection (other than status reports under paragraph (1) with respect to a project) shall be paid for with funds made available under subsection (b) of this section for such project. (k) PRIORITY PROJECTS.— (1) PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS.— •: (A) DRY RIDGE, KENTUCKY.—The

Secretary is authorized to carry out a highway project to demonstrate methods of improving traffic flow and safety on a portion of a Kentucky State highway which connects an interstate route in the vicinity of Dry Ridge, Kentucky, with a highway on the Federal-aid primary system in the vicinity of Owenton, Kentucky. (B) ISLE OF PALMS, SOUTH CAROLINA.—The Secretary is

t

<fi

authorized to carry out a highway project connecting the Isle of Palms, South Carolina, to the mainland for the purpose of demonstrating the reduction in traffic congestion, improved emergency preparedness, and increased accessibility to a sea island by construction of a high-level fixed span bridge over a high-volume intracoastal waterway segment. (C) IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO.—The Secretary is authorized to carry out the United States Route 20/26 Highway Project, located on United States Route 20/26 and United States Route 20 between the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory site and the city of Idaho Falls, Idaho. (D) LAS CRUCES, NEW MEXICO.—The Secretary is au-

thorized to carry out work on United States 70 in the State of New Mexico from Las Cruces, New Mexico to Texico, New Mexico. (E) LAWRENCE, KANSAS.—The Secretary is authorized to carry out, in Lawrence, Kansas, a bypass project which is a model for its cost-sharing arrangement and economic development goals.

�


text:
Page:A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field.pdf/43

Rh we should call the electric fluid, and select either vitreous or resinous electricity as the representative of that fluid, then we might have normal vibrations propagated with a velocity depending on this density. We have, however, no evidence as to the density of electricity, as we do not even know whether to consider vitreous electricity as a substance or as the absence of a substance.

Hence electromagnetic science leads to exactly the same conclusions as optical science with respect to the direction of the disturbances which can be propagated through the field; both affirm the propagation of transverse vibrations, and both give the same velocity of propagation. On the other hand, both sciences are at a loss when called on to affirm or deny the existence of normal vibrations.

Relation between the Index of Refraction and the Electromagnetic Character of the substance.

(101) The velocity of light in a medium, according to the Undulatory Theory, is

$\frac{1}{i}V_{0}$

where $$i$$ is the index of refraction and $$V_{0}$$ is the velocity in vacuum. The velocity, according to the Electromagnetic Theory, is

$\sqrt{\frac{k}{4\pi\mu}}$|undefined

where, by equations (49) and (71), $$k=\tfrac{1}{D}k_{0}$$, and $$k_{0}=4\pi V_{0}^{2}$$.

Hence

or the Specific Inductive Capacity is equal to the square of the index of refraction divided by the coefficient of magnetic induction.

Propagation of Electromagnetic Disturbances in a Crystallized Medium.

(102) Let us now calculate the conditions of propagation of a plane wave in a medium for which the values of $$k$$ and $$\mu$$ are different in different directions. As we do not propose to give a complete investigation of the question in the present imperfect state of the theory as extended to disturbances of short period, we shall assume that the axes of magnetic induction coincide in direction with those of electric elasticity.

(103) Let the values of the magnetic coefficient for the three axes be $$\lambda,\mu,\nu$$, then the equations of magnetic force (B) become

{{MathForm2|(81)|$$\left.\begin{array}{l} \lambda\alpha=\frac{dH}{dy}-\frac{dG}{dz},\\ \\\mu\beta=\frac{dF}{dz}-\frac{dH}{dx},\\ \\\nu\gamma=\frac{dG}{dx}-\frac{dF}{dy}.\end{array}\right\} $$}}


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 101 Part 1.djvu/234

 101 STAT. 204 .sion

PUBLIC LAW 100-17—APR. 2, 1987 (F) WICHITA, KANSAS.—The Secretary is authorized to carry out, in Wichita, Kansas, the replacement of a conventional intersection of 2 heavily-travelled streets at Kellogg and Oliver with a new low-cost European fly-over design for the interchange. (G) EMPORIA, KANSAS.—The Secretary is authorized to construct, in Emporia, Kansas, a new Prairie Street overpass to overcome existing flood conditions.

i^im

(H) SOUTH CAROLINA.—The Secretary is authorized to

o; Btieqoii

no xi

construct the South Carolina portion of the Bobby Jones Expressway bypass from 1-20 near North Augusta, South Carolina, south across the Savannah River into Georgia, where it connects with 1-520. (I) FORT WORTH, TEXAS.—The Secretary is authorized to carry out reconstruction and widening of a critical interchange ("West Leg") involving major, heavily traveled eastwest and north-south interstate highways (1-30 and 1-35, respectively), Fort Worth, Texas. (J)

Xk.

I-

>^ 9r

b

EBSENBERG,

PENNSYLVANIA.—The

is

authorized to carry out and construct the Ebsenberg Pennsylvania bypass to divert traffic from Route 219 in Ebsenberg, Pennsylvania, to a 5.1 mile relocated segment. (K) ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI.—The Secretary is authorized to carry out the restoration of the Martin Luther King bridge connecting the metro east area in Illinois and St. Louis, Missouri. (L) lowA.—The Secretary is authorized to carry out the construction of a bridge on United States Route 30 in Iowa to replace a 56-year-old structure which is too narrow to be utilized by motor carriers. (M) EAST CHICAGO, INDIANA.—The Secretary is authorized to construct the Cline Avenue—1-94 Interchange in East Chicago, Indiana. (N) EAST CHICAGO, INDIANA.—The Secretary is authorized to carry out the Cline Avenue Interchange improvement project in East Chicago, Indiana, for the reconstruction of an intersection of Cline Avenue and the Borman Expressway. (O) TEXARKANA, TEXAS.—The Secretary is authorized to carry out a highway project in the United States Route 59 highway corridor in Texas, from Texarkana to Houston to Beeville. (P) SOMERSET, PENNSYLVANIA.—The

K-

Secretary

Secretary

is

au-

thorized to carry out a study to determine the feasibility of constructing a 4-lane highway out of a 2-lane segment of Route 219 between Somerset, Pennsylvania, and the border of the State of Maryland. (Q) JOHNSTOWN, PENNSYLVANIA.—The Secretary is au-

oi by.

thorized to carry out a study to determine the feasibility of constructing a 4-lane highway out of a 2-lane segment that connects Route 56, near Johnstown, Pennsylvania, to Route 22. (R) PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA.—The Secretary is au-

thorized to carry out a study to determine the feasibility of making Route 22 between Ebensburg and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, completely 4-lane. ^

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 101 Part 1.djvu/235

 PUBLIC LAW 100-17—APR. 2, 1987

101 STAT. 205

(S) ExTON, PENNSYLVANIA.—The Secretary is authorized d to carry out a project to construct a bypass of approximately 4.9 miles parallel to Route 30, to divert motor traffic around the city of Exton, Pennsylvania. (T) BELLA VISTA, ARKANSAS.—The Secretary is authorized 'i. to carry out a highway project in the State of Arkansas on a segment of a north-south highway on the Federal-aid primary system from the vicinity of the junction of Interstate r Routes 1-40 and 1-540 to the boundary between the States of Arkansas and Missouri in the vicinity of Bella Vista, ^ Arkansas, for the purpose of demonstrating methods of improving highway safety and of accelerating highway construction. Such project shall increase the number of "• lanes on such segment from 2 to 4. ^, (2) FUNDING.—A State may use any amount apportioned for fiscal year 1987, 1988, 1989, 1990, or 1991 under section 104 (other than 104(b)(5)(A)) or section 144 of title 23, United States Code, to pay the Federal share of the cost of a project under this subsection. (3) FEDERAL SHARE.—If Federal-aid highway funds are used to complete a project pursuant to this subsection, the use of such funds shall be subject to the appropriate Federal share applicable with respect to such class of funds under title 23, United States Code. SEC. 150. CUMBERLAND GAP NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK. VIRGINIA.

(a) AVAILABILITY OF PARKWAY FUNDS.—Section 160(a) of the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1973 (87 Stat. 278) is amended by adding at the end the following new sentences: "After completion of the reconstruction and relocation of Route 25E through the Cumberland Gap National Historical Park (including construction of a tunnel and the approaches thereto), funds available for parkways, notwithstanding the definition of parkways in section 101(a) of title 23, United States Code, shall be available to finance the cost of upgrading from 2 lanes to 4 lanes a highway providing access from such route through that portion of the Cumberland Gap National Historical Park which lies within the State of Virginia. The project referred to in the preceding sentence, including preparation of any environmental impact statements with respect to such project, shall not delay or affect in any way the reconstruction and relocation of Route 25E (including construction of a tunnel and approaches thereto).". (b) INCLUSION OF APPROACHES.—Subsection (b) of section 160 of such Act is amended by inserting after "rights-of-way" the following: ", including approaches in the State of Virginia,". SEC. 151. DELAWARE RIVER BRIDGES. (a) REPAYMENT OF FEDERAL FUNDS INVESTED O N 1-80 BRIDGE.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Delaware River Joint Toll Bridge Commission (hereinafter in this section referred to as the "Commission"), in conjunction with the State highway agencies of the States of Pennsylvania and New Jersey, shall enter into an agreement with the Secretary to repay to the Treasury of the United States any Federal funds which previously have been obligated or otherwise expended by the Federal Government with respect to the Delaware Water Gap Bridge on 1-80. Such repayment shall be credited to the Highway Trust Fund.

Pennsylvania.

�