text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 101 Part 2.djvu/38

 101 STAT. 1024

PUBLIC LAW 100-180—DEC. 4, 1987

Sec. 723. Allocation to health professions of specified portion of Navy officer accessions and growth in end strengths. Sec. 724. Revised deadlines for the use of diagnosis-related groups. Sec. 725. Federal preemption regarding contracts for medical and dental care. Sec. 726. CHAMPUS coverage for Sudden Infant Death Syndrome monitoring equipment. PART C—HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT

<

Sec. 731. Demonstration project on management of health care in catchment areas and other demonstration projects. Sec. 732. Additional requirements for CHAMPUS reform initiative. .; • Sec. 733. Medical information systems acquisition amendments. Sec. 734. GAO report on payment of certain medical expenses. TITLE Vm—ACQUISITION POLICY ,

.

'

!

PART A—AcQUismoN PROCESS

Sec. 801. Functions of Director of Operational Test and Evaluation. Sec. 802. Survivability and lethality testing of major systems. Sec. 803. Oversight of cost or schedule variances in certain major acquisition programs. Sec. 804. Truth-in-Negotiations Act amendments. Sec. 805. Allowable costs not to include golden parachute payments. Sec. 806. Requirement for substantial progress on minority and small business contract awards. Sec. 807. Amendments to procurement technical assistance cooperative agreement program. Sec. 808. Rights in technical data. . V '•••'•••'•Sec. 809. Small business set-aside program amendments. Sec. 810. Contract terms and conditions relating to contractor costs for production special tooling and production special test equipment. Part B—OTHER AcQuismoN MATTERS

Sec. 821. Conflict of interest in defense procurement. Sec. 822. Restatement and modification of restrictions on retired military officers regarding certain matters affecting the Government. Sec. 823. Restriction on purchase of foreign-made administrative motor vehicles. Sec. 824. Procurement of manual typewriters from Warsaw Pact countries. Sec. 825. Sense of Congress on preparation of certain economic impact and employment information concerning new acquisition programs. Sec. 901. Sec. 902. Sec. 903. Sec. 904. Sec. 905. Sec. 906. Sec. 907.

TITLE IX—MATTERS RELATING TO ARMS CONTROL Missile technology control regime. Sense of Congress on the Krasnoyarsk radar. Report on compliance by the Soviet Union with Threshold Test Ban Treaty. Congressional findings and declarations concerning arms control negotiations. Report on military consequences of the elimination of ballistic missiles. Report on implications of certain arms control positions. Support for nuclear risk reduction centers. > i '

TITLE X—MATTERS RELATING TO NATO COUNTRIES AND OTHER ALLIES PART A—NATO DETERRENCE

Sec. 1001. Report on requirements for maintaining NATO's strategy of deterrence. Sec. 1002. Sense of Congress on level of United States forces permanently stationed in Europe in support of NATO. Sec. 1003. Study of future of NATO. "'*''"

PART B—BURDEN SHARING

Sec. 1011. Study of defense expenditures in Japan. Sec. 1012. Sense of Congress regarding Japan's contributions to global stability. PART C—PROCUREMENT MATTERS

Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec.

1021. 1022. 1023. 1024.

Overseas workload program. NATO cooperative project agreements. "<•. Report on co-production or co-assembly of MlAl tank. Weapons storage and security systems. ... »:

i

v: -.•:

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 101 Part 2.djvu/39

 PUBLIC LAW 100-180—DEC. 4, 1987 i

101 STAT. 1025

TITLE XI—DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE MANAGEMENT '

•

PART A—CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF NAVAL VESSEI^

Sec. 1101. Clarification of limitation on contracting for short-term naval vessel repair work. Sec. 1102. Rates for progress payments on certain naval ship repeiir contracts. Sec. 1103. Domestic construction of certain vessels. Sec. 1104. Contracts for the overhaul, repair, and maintenance of naval vessels. PART B—CONTRACTING OUT

Sec. 1111. Authority of base commsuiders over contracting for commercial activities. Sec. 1112. Prohibition on contracts for performance of security-guard functions. PART C—SECURITY AND COUNTERINTELLIGENCE MATTERS

Sec. 1121. Counterintelligence polygraph program. Sec. 1122. Assessment of Soviet electronic espionage capability from Mount Alto Embassy site. Sec. 1123. Dissemination of unclassified information concerning physical protection of special nuclear material. PART D—SPECIAL ACCESS PROGRAMS

Sec. 1131. Sense of Congress with respect to disclosure of certain budget and schedule information about specified special access programs. Sec. 1132. Congressional oversight of special access programs. Sec. 1133. Reports on criteria for designating special access programs. TITLE XII—GENERAL PROVISIONS PART A—FINANCIAL AND BUDGET MATTERS

' ' *^ *'^''' ,it^»

Sec. 1201. Transfer authority. Sec. 1202. Limitation on availability of funds. Sec. 1203. Requirement for consistency in the budget presentations of the Department of Defense. PART B—FORCE STRUCTURE AND POLICY

Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec.

1211. 1212. 1213. 1214.

Implementation of special operations forces reorganization. Conventional Defense Advisory Board. Report on competitive strategies. Publication of annual United States-Soviet net assessment. PART C—MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS

Sec. 1221. Study of Space Operations Center, Colorado. Sec. 1222. Report on contingency plans to deal with disruptions in Persian Gulf crude oil supply. Sec. 1223. Study of early decommissioning of two aircraft carriers. PART D—TECHNICAL AND CLERICAL AMENDMENTS

Sec. 1231. Amendments to title 10, United States Code. Sec. 1232. Amendments to title 37, United States Code. Sec. 1233. Miscellaneous amendments. PART E—MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS

Sec. 1241. GAO study of the capabilities of the United States to control drug smuggling into the United States. Sec. 1242. Transfer of funds to the Coast Guard. Sec. 1243. Annual plan on Department of Defense assistance for civilian drug law enforcement. Sec. 1244. Provision of command and control data from Tyndall Air Force Base for drug interdiction assistance. Sec. 1245. Assistant to the Secretary of Defense for Atomic Energy. Sec. 1246. Oil shipments for use of military facilities overseas. Sec. 1247. Payment of claim. Sec. 1248. Procedures for forensic examination of certain physiological evidence. Sec. 1249. Adjudication of ineligibility for a job with the Federal Government on the basis of failure to register under the Military Selective Service Act. Sec. 1250. Transportation on Department of Defense aeromedical evacuation aircraft of certain Veterans' Administration beneficiaries.

�

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 101 Part 2.djvu/40

 101 STAT. 1026

PUBLIC LAW 100-180—DEC. 4, 1987 TITLE Xin—AMENDMENTS RELATED TO GOLDWATER-NICHOLS REORGANIZATION ACT PART A—JOINT OFFICER PERSONNEL POLICY

Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec.

130L 1302. 1303. 1304.

Nomination and selection of officers for the joint specialty. Joint duty assignment positions. Length of joint duty assignments. Notice to Congress of use of waiver authorities and exclusions with respect to officer management. Sec. 1305. Special transition rules for nuclear propulsion officers. PART B—OTHER MATTERS

Sec. 1311. Temporary increase in number of Assistant Secretaries of Defense. Sec. 1312. Reduction in personnel assigned to management headquarters activities and certain other activities. Sec. 1313. Clarification of forces not required to be assigned to combatant commands. Sec. 1314. Technical amendments. Sec. 1401. Sec. 1402. Sec. 1403. Sec. 1404. Sec. 1405.

TITLE XIV—FOREIGN RELATIONS MATTERS Commendation of Armed Forces in Persian Gulf for success of certain operations. Sense of the Senate regarding justification for sinking Iranian vessels. United States policy toward Panama. Congressional statements concerning Vietnamese occupation of Cambodia and Japanese trade with Vietnam. Sense of Congress on introduction of Armed Forces into Nicaragua for combat.

DIVISION B—MILITARY CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATIONS Sec. 2001. Short title. Sec. 2002. Explanation of alternative levels. Subdivision 1—Fiscal Year 1988 Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec.

2101. 2102. 2103. 2104. 2105.

TITLE I—ARMY Authorized Army construction and land acquisition projects. Family housing. Improvements to military family housing units. Authorization of appropriations, Army. Extension of certain prior year authorizations.

2121. 2122. 2123. 2124. 2125. 2126. 2127. 2128.

TITLE II—NAVY Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition projects. Family housing. Improvements to military family housing units. Defense access roads. Authorization of appropriations, Navy. Authorization of projects for which funds have been appropriated. Extension of certain prior year authorizations. Naval Weapons Station, Earle, New Jersey.

2131. 2132. 2133. 2134. 2135. 2136. 2137.

TITLE III—AIR FORCE Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition projects. Family housing. Improvements to military family housing units. Defense access roads. Authorization of appropriations. Air Force. Authorization of projects for which funds have been appropriated. Extension of certain previous authorizations.

2141. 2142. 2143. 2144. 2145. 2146. 2147.

TITLE IV—DEFENSE AGENCIES Authorized defense agencies construction and land acquisition projects. Family housing. Improvements to military family housing units. Defense access roads. ' Authorization of appropriations, defense agencies. Authorization of project for which appropriations have been made. Extension of certain prior year authorizations.

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 101 Part 2.djvu/41

 PUBLIC LAW 100-180—DEC. 4, 1987

101 STAT. 1027

Sec. 2148. Brooke Army Medical Center. Sec. 2149. Conforming storage facilities. Sec. 2150. Construction of a national test facility for the Strategic Defense Initiative. TITLE V—NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION INFRASTRUCTURE Sec. 2151. Authorized NATO construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2152. Authorization of appropriations, NATO. TITLE VI—GUARD AND RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES Sec. 2161. Authorized Guard and Reserve construction and land acquisition projects. TITLE VII—EXPIRATION OF AUTHORIZATIONS Sec. 2171. Expiration of authorizations. Subdivision 2—Fiscal Year 1989 Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec.

2201. 2202. 2203. 2204.

TITLE I-ARMY Authorized Army construction and land acquisition projects. Family housing. Improvements to military family housing units. Authorization of appropriations, Army.

2221. 2222. 2223. 2224.

TITLE II—NAVY Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition projects. Family housing. Improvements to military family housing units. Authorization of appropriations. Navy.

2231. 2232. 2233. 2234.

TITLE III—AIR FORCE Authorized Air Force construction and Itmd acquisition projects. Family housing. Improvements to military family housing units. Authorization of appropriations. Air Force.

R

TITLE IV—DEFENSE AGENCIES Sec. 2241. Authorized defense agencies construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2242. Improvements to military housing units. Sec. 2243. Authorization of appropriations, defense agencies. TITLE V—NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION INFRASTRUCTURE Sec. 2251. Authorized NATO construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2252. Authorization of appropriations, NATO. TITLE VI-GUARD AND RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES Sec. 2261. Authorized Guard and Reserve construction and land acquisition projects. TITLE VII—EXPIRATION OF AUTHORIZATIONS AND EFFECTIVE DATE Sec. 2271. Expiration of authorizations of projects and appropriations for fiscal years after fiscal year 1988. Sec. 2272. Effective date. Subdivisions—General Provisions Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec.

TITLE I—MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM CHANGES 2301. Turn-key selection procedures for defense agencies. 2302. Long-term facilities contracts. 2303. Settlement of contractor claims. 2304. Guard and Reserve minor construction. 2305. Family housing improvement threshold. 2306. Family housing leasing within the United States. 2307. Family housing rental guarantee program. 2308. No-cost acquisition of family housing. 2309. Cost threshold for individual units and maximum number of units leased in foreign countries. 2310. Minor construction outside the United States. 2311. Cost threshold for multiple units.

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 101 Part 2.djvu/42

 101 STAT. 1028

PUBLIC LAW 100-180—DEC. 4, 1987

Sec. 2312. Cost variations. ." ^" J Sec. 2313. Family housing improvements. . .; TITLE II—MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS Sec. 2321. Pilot program for military family housing. '' ""•'^"" Sec. 2322. Restrictions on u s e of certain funding. Sec. 2323. Prohibition of funding for certain military construction contracts on Guam. Sec. 2324. Community planning assistance. •. y. ••>--• Sec. 2325. Disposition of real property a t Air Force missile sites. Sec. 2326. Tulalip Tribes, Washington. ^ 'lS>3g Sec. 2331. Sec. 2332. Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec.

2333. 2334. 2335. 2336. 2337. 2338. 2339. 2340. 2341. 2342. 2343. 2344. 2345.

TITLE III—REAL PROPERTY TRANSACTIONS Lease of property, S a n Francisco, California. Sale of land and replacement of certain facilities, Kapalama Military Reservation, Hawaii. Land conveyance, Lawrence Township, Indiana. Land transfers: Rock Island, Illinois, and Fort Sam Houston, Texas. Property transfer, Brooklyn, N e w York. Land exchange. Orange County, California. Transfer of land, Joliet Army ammunition plant, Illinois. Lease of property a t the Naval Supply Center, Oakland, California. Authority to release certain rights. •' Mineral interests a t White Sands Missile Range, N e w Mexico. Land conveyance. Fort Jackson, South Carolina. Land exchange, Hamilton Air Force Base, California. -^ ' ' • '. " Land conveyance, Chanute Air Force Base, Illinois. •? Land exchange, S a n Diego, California. • ' • Property transaction. Barling, Arkansas.

D IV I S I O N C—OTHER NATIONAL D E F E N S E AUTHORIZATIONS TITLE I—DEPARTMENT OF E N E R G Y N A T I O N A L SECURITY PROGRAMS Sec. 3101. Short title. P A R T A — N A T I O N A L SECURITY PROGRAMS AUTHORIZATIONS

Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec.

3111. 3112. 3113. 3114.

Operating expenses. Plant and capital equipment. Funding limitations. Undistributed reduction.

^.'

' •.•

'

• > • ' %. • '•'^,

P A R T B — R E C U R R I N G GENERAL PROVISIONS

Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec.

3121. 3122. 3123. 3124. 3125. 3126. 3127.

Reprogramming. •. Limits on general plant projects. ^ •. • -' Limits on construction projects. Fund transfer authority. Authority for construction design. Authority for emergency construction design. Funds available for all national security programs of the Department of Energy. Sec. 3128. Adjustments for pay increases. ,„,,,,. . • o. > Sec. 3129. Availability of funds. >•• ^--.>.-..^^ "': — ^ P A R T C — M I S C E L L A N E O U S PROVISIONS

-^

Sec. 3131. Allowable costs to include certain information provided to Congress and State legislatures. Sec. 3132. Modernization of nuclear weapons complex. Sec. 3133. Requirements to ensure safe operation of N reactor. • -^^^ Sec. 3134. Interim oversight of safety of the nuclear weapons complex. Sec. 3135. Timely determination of property rights in inventions and discoveries. Sec. 3136. Production reactor acquisition strategy. PART D—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY SEMICONDUCTOR TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH EXCELLENCE INITIATIVE

X

Sec. 3141. Findings. Sec. 3142. Establishment of the semiconductor manufacturing technology research initiative. Sec. 3143. Participation of national laboratories of the Department of Energy. Sec. 3144. Personnel exchanges.

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 101 Part 2.djvu/43

 PUBLIC LAW 100-180—DEC. 4, 1987

101 STAT. 1029

Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec.

3145. Other Department of Energy resources. , T, 3146. Budgeting for semiconductor manufacturing technology research. 3147. Cost-sharing agreements. 3148. Department of Energy oversight of cooperative agreements relating to the initiative. Sec. 3149. Avoidance of duplication. Sec. 3150. Authorization of appropriations. Sec. 3151. Technology transfer. j i.v^'.. Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec.

TITLE II—NATIONAL DEFENSE STOCKPILE

3201. Short title. 3202. Stockpile requirements. 3203. Stockpile manager. 3204. Authorized uses of stockpile transaction fund. 3205. Deadline for annual materials plan. 3206. Technical amendments.

 * f f.

',

TITLE in—CIVIL DEFENSE

Sec. 3301. Authorization of appropriation. Sec. 3302. Withholding of funds for failure or refusal to participate in simulated -?»i nuclear attack exercise.

DIVISION A—DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS TITLE I—PROCUREMENT iii/os SEC. 101. ARMY

PART A—FUNDING AUTHORIZATIONS '

(a) AIRCRAFT.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for procurement of aircraft for the Army as follows: (1) $2,864,667,000 ($2,786,582,000) for fiscal year 1988. (2) $2,422,642,000 for fiscal year 1989. (b) MISSILES.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for procurement of missiles for the Army as follows: (1) $2,425,875,000 ($2,355,875,000) for fiscal year 1988. (2) $2,231,368,000 for fiscal year 1989. (c) WEAPONS AND TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for procurement of weapons and tracked combat vehicles for the Army as follows: (1) $3,435,137,000 for fiscal year 1988. (2) $1,846,250,000 for fiscal year 1989. (d) AMMUNITION.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for procurement of ammunition for the Army as follows: (1) $2,397,938,000 ($2,215,638,000) for fiscal year 1988. (2) $2,104,649 for fiscal year 1989. (e) OTHER PROCUREMENT.—Funds are hereby authorized to be

appropriated for other procurement for the Army as follows: (1) $5,494,504,000 ($5,478,204,000) for fiscal year 1988 as follows: For tactical and support vehicles, $942,560,000. For communications and electronics equipment, $3,353,166,000 ($3,345,166,000). For other support equipment, $1,183,478,000. (2) $2,794,389,000 for fiscal year 1989.

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 101 Part 2.djvu/44

 101 STAT. 1030

PUBLIC LAW 100-180—DEC. 4, 1987

SEC. 102. NAVY AND MARINE CORPS

(a) AIRCRAFT.—(1) Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for procurement of aircraft for the Navy as follows: (A) $9,604,987,000 ($8,610,118,000) for fiscal year 1988. " (B) $5,591,525,000 for fiscal year 1989. (2) Of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available for procurement of aircraft for the Navy for fiscal year 1988: (A) $5,387,322,000 ($4,956,739,000) is available only for combat aircraft programs as follows: For the A-6E program, $376,610,000 ($0). For the EA-6B program, $521,571,000. For the F-14A/D program, $873,848,000. For the FA-18 program, $2,580,222,000. For the SH-60B program, $197,614,000 ($143,641,000). For the SH-60F program, $329,961,000. For the long-range air ASW capable aircraft program, $80,200,000. For the E-2C program, $427,296,000. (B) $833,193,000 ($800,493,000) is available only for modification of aircraft programs as follows: For the A-6 series, $219,651,000. For the H-2 series, $45,108,000. For the P-3 series, $172,865,000. For the S-3 series, $142,522,000. For the ES-3 series, $115,200,000. For the E2 series, $71,139,000 ($38,439,000). For common electronic countermeasures (ECM) equipment, $66,708,000. (b) WEAPONS.—(1) Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 1988 in the total amount of $5,989,023,000 ($5,857,023,000) for procurement of weapons (including missiles and toipedoes) for the Navy as follows: (A) For missile programs, $5,372,891,000 ($5,240,891,000). (B)(i) For torpedo programs, $462,864,000, as follows: For the MK-48 torpedo program, $243,444,000. For the MK-50 Advanced Lightweight Torpedo program, $108,402,000. For the MK-30 mobile target program, $31,495,000. ,: For the antisubmarine rocket (ASROC) program, " $9,522,000. For the modification of torpedoes and related equipment, $16,015,000. For the torpedo support equipment program, $33,348,000. For the antisubmarine warfare range support program, $20,638,000. (ii) The sum of the sunounts authorized for torpedo programs under this subparagraph is reduced by $78,000,000 in order to meet the total amount authorized to be appropriated set forth at the beginning of this subparagraph. (C) For other weapons, $101,540,000, of which $28,023,000 is for the MK-15 close-in weapon system program. (D) For spares and repair parts, $129,728,000. (2) Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 1989 in the amount of $3,261,068,000 for procurement of weapons (including missiles and torpedoes) for the Navy.

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 101 Part 2.djvu/45

 PUBLIC LAW 100-180—DEC. 4, 1987

101 STAT. 1031

(c) SHIPBUILDING AND CONVERSION.—(1) Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for shipbuilding and conversion for the Navy as follows: (A) $9,530,427,000 for fiscal year 1988. (B) $8,529,700,000 for fiscal year 1989. (2) Amounts authorized under paragraph (1) are available for shipbuilding and conversion progr£uns as follows: For the Trident submarine program, $1,290,800,000 for fiscal For the CVN aircraft carrier program, $644,000,000 for fiscal year 1988 and $797,000,000 for fiscal year 1989. For the SSN-688 nuclear attack submarine program, $1,676,900,000 for fiscal year 1988 and $1,527,800,000 for fiscal year 1989. For the SSN-21 nuclear attack submarine program, $257,600,000 for fiscal year 1988. For the aircraft carrier service life extension program (SLEP), $729,755,000 for fiscal year 1988. For the CG-47 Aegis cruiser program, $3,328,900,000 for fiscal year 1988 and $825,000,000 for fiscal year 1989. For the DDG-51 guided missile destroyer program, $5,500,000 for fiscal year 1988 and $2,929,100,000 for fiscal year 1989. For the LHD-1 amphibious assault ship program, $752,900,000 for fiscal year 1988 and $741,100,000 for fiscal year ^, 1989. For the LSD-41 cargo variant program, $324,200,000 for fiscal year 1988. For the TAO-187 fleet oiler program, $279,100,000 for fiscal year 1988 and $256,400,000 for fiscal year 1989. For the strategic sealift program, $43,400,000 for fiscal year 1988 For the TAGOS-SWATH Ocean Surveillance Ship program, $96,500,000 for fiscal year 1988. For the AO (Jumbo) conversion program, $44,100,000 for fiscal year 1988. For the landing craft, air cushion program, $33,700,000 for fiscal year 1988. For the TAGS auxiliary crane ship program, $53,100,000 for fiscal year 1988 and $55,000,000 for fiscal year 1989. For service craft, $12,500,000 for fiscal year 1988. For outfitting and post delivery, $328,800,000 for fiscal year 1988. The sum of the amounts authorized for programs under this subsection for fiscal year 1988 is reduced by $371,328,000 in order to meet the total amount authorized to be appropriated for that fiscal year in paragraph (1). (3) There are hereby authorized to be transferred to shipbuilding and conversion programs for the Navy for fiscal year 1988 pursuant to the authorizations of appropriations in paragraph (1), to the extent provided in appropriation Acts and without extension of the period of the availabliity of such amounts for obligation, amounts appropriated for fiscal years before fiscal year 1988 for shipbuilding and conversion for the Navy and remaining available for obligation in the total amount of $371,328,000 as follows: FVom the Trident submarine program for fiscal year 1984, $58,879,000.
 * year 1988 and $1,398,300,000 for fiscal year 1989.

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 101 Part 2.djvu/46

 101 STAT. 1032

PUBLIC LAW 100-180—DEC. 4, 1987

From the Trident submarine program for fiscal year 1985, ^ $19,383,000. From the Trident submarine program for fiscal year 1987, $68,060,000. From the TAK cargo ship program for fiscal year 1984, $784,000. From the SSN-688 attack submarine program for fiscal year 1987, $30,000,000. From the aircraft carrier service life extension program for ' fiscal year 1985, $48,000,000. From the battleship reactivation program for fiscal year 1984, $5,000,000. From the CG-47 Aegis carrier program for fiscal year 1984, $6,500,000. From the CG-47 Aegis carrier program for fiscal year 1987, $52,400,000. From the LSD-41 amphibious assault ship program for fiscal J year 1985, $4,000,000. From the LSD-41 amphibious assault ship program for fiscal year 1986, $1,300,000. From the LHD-1 amphibious assault ship program for fiscal year 1986, $3,100,000. « From the TAO fleet oiler program for fiscal year 1984, ' $5,943,000. From the AOE fast combat support ship program for fiscal ^ year 1987, $1,900,000. ^ _, From the TAKE program for fiscal year 1984, $1,596,000. «.£>«i From the TAGS crane ship conversion program for fiscal year 1985, $2,009,000. From the TAGS crane ship conversion program for fiscal year 1987, $7,703,000. From the service craft program for fiscal year 1984, $10,397,000. From the service craft program for fiscal year 1986, $5,100,000. From the service craft program for fiscal year 1987, $13,900,000. From the landing craft program for fiscal year 1987, $19,000,000. From outfitting and post delivery for fiscal year 1984, $6,374,000. (d) OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY.—(1) Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for other procurement for the Navy as follows: (A) $5,321,592,000 ($5,207,103,000) for fiscal year 1988. (B) $1,082,048,000 for fiscal year 1989. '* (2) Amounts appropriated pursuant to paragraph (1) for fiscal year 1988 shall be available as follows: For the ship support equipment program, $869,716,000. For the communications and electronics equipment program, ' $1,809,417,000. For aviation support equipment, $815,315,000 ($734,815,000). For the ordnance support equipment program, $894,542,000. For programs for civil engineering support equipment, supply support equipment, and personnel/command support equipment, a total of $623,776,000 ($589,787,000). For spares and repair parts, $308,826,000. S-JIC.O.^<;.

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 101 Part 2.djvu/47

 PUBLIC LAW 100-180—DEC. 4, 1987

101 STAT. 1033

(3) There are hereby authorized to be transferred to other procurement programs for the Navy for fiscal year 1988 pursuant to the authorizations of appropriations in paragraph (1), to the extent provided in appropriation Acts and without extension of obligational availability, amounts appropriated for fiscal years before fiscal year 1988 for other procurement for the Navy and remaining available for obligation in the total amount of $36,541,000 as follows: From the electronically suspended gyro navigation program for fiscal year 1986, $1,410,000. From the vertical launch system (surface) program for fiscal year 1986, $907,000. From the quick strike program for fiscal year 1986, $1,851,000. From the amphibious equipment program for fiscal year 1986, $864,000. From the production support facility program for fiscal year 1987, $11,095,000. From the crush/MIX/patch/pave equipment program for fiscal year 1987, $1,225,000. From the drill/blast equipment program for fiscal year 1987, $109,000. From the miscellaneous construction/maintenance equipment program for fiscal year 1987, $2,085,000. From the weight handling equipment program for fiscal year 1987, $2,113,000. From the computer acquisition program for fiscal year 1987, $14,882,000. (4) Of the amounts appropriated pursuant to paragraph (1) for fiscal year 1989, $89,064,000 shall be available for the communications and electronics equipment program. (e) PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for procurement (including missiles, tracked combat vehicles, and other weapons) for the Marine (Dorps in amounts as follows: (1) $1,333,575,000 ($1,330,546,000) for fiscal year 1988. (2) $451,415,000 for fiscal year 1989. SEC. 103. AIR FORCE

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for procurement for the Air Force as follows: (1) For aircraft: (A) $13,224,331,000 ($12,689,331,000) for fiscal year 1988. oiQ (B) $7,577,436,000 for fiscal year 1989. (2) For missiles: (A) $7,513,544,000 ($7,229,862,000) for fiscal year 1988. (B) $2,214,719,000 for fiscal year 1989. (3) For other procurement for fiscal year 1988, $8,422,866,000 ($8,243,504,000), of which— (A) $687,647,000 ($656,347,000) is for munitions and associated support equipment; (B) $239,074,000 is for vehicular equipment; (C) $2,190,221,000 ($2,071,559,000) is for electronics and telecommunications equipment; and (D) $5,316,924,000 ($5,287,524,000) is for other base maintenance and support equipment. (4) For other procurement, $2,742,725,000 for fiscal year 1989, ofwhich—

�


text:
Page:The Yellow Book - 06.djvu/121

 raillery to his friends; the boys and girls fought their separate ways, gathering educational manna from every bush; and became practical hard-headed men and women of the world, with a keen eye to the main chance, a grip of the essentials of life, as befits the offspring of a dreamer.

Something of scorn for his failures, of contempt for his ideals, impatience with his shiftlessness, tinged their attitude to him always, and, spreading wider, their attitude towards every one who bore not the hall-mark of the world's estimate of success. What is the good of it, how much will it bring? was their standard of worth.

Barney who had become a successful stockbroker, occasionally found the former acquaintanceship of the old guv'nor with sundry families of noble breeding of signal service to him. He never failed to make capital of the "old Dad's" intimate knowledge of salmon-fishing, or the best places to go in search of big game and the easiest way to get there. "A fellow whose father is a crack shot and an authority on salmon-fishing can't be quite a cad, don't you know!" young De Vere would urge when asking his governor to send City Barney an invitation.

Barney, in return, paid for the Captain's cheap lodgings, and gave him a hint that the "missus" only cared to see people on invitation, as the chicks asked awkward questions before her folk as to why grandpa lived in such a little house? It didn't do! The Captain would curl his grey moustache fiercely and turn to his pipe and book, and lay the one as it burnt out as a marker in the half-read page of the other, and close his eyes with a vehemence of intention that boded ill for the performance, to map out the chapters of the wonderful book.

Dick, who had inherited his facile invention, astounding memory, and his adaptive mercurial temperament, without any of his tenderness of heart, had taken successfully to journalism as a stone

title: Page:The Yellow Book - 06.djvu/121


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 101 Part 2.djvu/48

 101 STAT. 1034

PUBLIC LAW 100-180—DEC. 4, 1987 (A) $627,006,000 is for munitions and associated support equipment; (B) $219,198,000 is for vehicle equipment; (C) $1,314,782,000 is for electronics and communications; and (D) $581,739,000 is for other base maintenance and support equipment.

Sl!:C. 104. DEFENSE AGENCIES

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 1988 for the Defense Agencies in the amount of $1,293,312,000 ($1,288,371,000). SEC. 105. RESERVE COMPONENTS

(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 1988 for procurement of Eiircraft, vehicles, communications equipment, and other miscellaneous equipment for the reserve components of the Armed Forces as follows: For the Army National Guard, $125,000,000 ($60,000,000). For the Air National Guard, $258,000,000. ilii For the Army Reserve, $90,000,000. For the Air Force Reserve, $165,000,000. «» For the Navy Reserve, $25,000,000. For the Marine Corps Reserve, $40,000,000. 0)) AUTHORIZATIONS IN ADDITION TO OTHER

AMOUNTS.—The

authorizations of appropriations contained in subsection (a) are in addition to any other amount authorized to be appropriated by this or any other Act. SEC. 106. MILESTONE AUTHORIZATIONS FOR PROCUREMENT PROGRAMS (a) MOBILE SUBSCRIBER EQUIPMENT.—(1) Of the amounts appro-

priated for other procurement for the Army for fiscal years 1988 and 1989 for communications and electronic equipment, $1,019,800,000 of the amount appropriated for fiscal year 1988 and $995,700,000 of the amount appropriated for fiscal year 1989 may be obligated only for the Mobile Subscriber Equipment program. (2) Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for other procurement for the Army for the Mobile Subscriber Equipment program as follows: (A) $976,200,000 for fiscal year 1990. (B) $360,000,000 for fiscal year 1991. (b) ARMY TACTICAL MISSILE SYSTEM.—(1) Of the amounts appropriated for procurement of missiles for the Army for fiscal years 1988 and 1989, $16,925,000 of the amount appropriated for fiscal year 1988 and $81,300,000 of the amount appropriated for fiscal year 1989 may be obligated only for the Army Tactical Missile System. (2) Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for procurement of missiles for the Army for the Army Tactical Missile System as follows: (A) $158,200,000 for fiscal year 1990. • - (B) $209,000,000 for fiscal year 1991. (C) $88,200,000 for fiscal year 1992. (c) TRIDENT II MISSILE.—(1) Of the amounts appropriated for procurement of weapons for the Navy for fiscal years 1988 and 1989, $2,251,331,000 of the amount appropriated for fiscal year 1988 and $2,227,100,000 of the amount appropriated for fiscal year 1989 may

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 101 Part 2.djvu/49

 PUBLIC LAW 100-180—DEC. 4, 1987

101 STAT. 1035

be obligated only for the Trident II missile program. In achieving any undistributed reduction required to be made in programs, projects, or activities for which funds have been appropriated to the Department of Defense for fiscal year 1988, no reduction may be made in the amount of funds available for the Trident II missile program. (2) Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for procurement of weapons for the Navy for the Trident II missile as follows: (A) $2,215,000,000 for fiscal year 1990. (B) $2,090,500,000 for fiscal year 1991. (C) $1,977,000,000 for fiscal year 1992. (d) T-45 TRAINING SYSTEM.—(1) Of the amounts appropriated for procurement of aircraft for the Navy for fiscal years 1988 and 1989 $358,210,000 of the amount appropriated for fiscal year 1988 and $403,466,000 of the amount appropriated for fiscal year 1989 may be obligated only for the T-45 Training System. (2) Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for procurement of aircraft for the Navy for the T-45 Training System as follows: (A) $437,700,000 for fiscal year 1990. (B) $596,300,000 for fiscal year 1991. (C) $652,300,000 for fiscal year 1992. -'' (e) APPLICATION OF SECTION 2437 OF TITLE 10.—Programs referred to in subsections (a) through (d) are defense enterprise programs for the purpose of section 2437 of title 10, United States Code. SEC. 107. AUTHORIZATION OF FUNDS FOR CHEMICAL DEMILITARIZATION PROGRAM

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary ~ of Defense for fiscal year 1988 for the destruction of lethal chemical agents and munitions in accordance with section 1412 of the Department of Defense Authorization Act, 1986 (Public Law 99-145; 99 Stat. 747), in the amount of $125,100,000, of which— (1) $94,100,000 shall be for operation and maintenance; (2) $11,500,000 shall be for research, development, test and evaluation; and (3) $19,500,000 shall be for procurement. SEC. 108. AUTHORIZED MULTIYEAR CONTRACTS

(a) ARMY.—Subject to subsection (d)(D, the Secretary of the Army may enter into multiyear contracts in accordance with section 2306(h) of title 10, United States Code, for procurement of the following: (1) High-Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicle program. (2) AN/ALQ-136 jammer. (3) TOW 2 Missile (for the Army and Marine Corps). (b) NAVY.—(1) Subject to subsection (d)(2), the Secretary of the Navy may enter into a multiyear contract under section 2306(h) of title 10, United States Code, for the Hawk Missile System. (2) If by January 1, 1988, legislation described in section 3(c) has not been enacted, the Secretary of the Navv shall enter into a fiveyear multiyear contract under section 2306(h) of title 10, United States Code, for procurement of 420 FA-18 aircraft. (c) AIR FORCE.—Subject to subsection (d)(D, the Secretary of the Air Force may enter into a multiyear contract under section 2306(h) of title 10, United States Code, for the Defense Meteorological Satellite Program.

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 101 Part 2.djvu/50

 101 STAT. 1036

PUBLIC LAW 100-180—DEC. 4, 1987

(d) CONDITIONS.—(1) A multiyear contract authorized by subsection (a), 03X2), or (c) may not be entered into unless the anticipated cost over the period of the contract is no more than 88 percent of the anticipated cost of carrying out the same program through annual contracts. (2) A multiyear contract authorized by subsection 0>)(1) may not be entered into unless the anticipated cost over the period of the contract is no more than 88 percent of the average cost incurred for the same system procured with funds appropriated for fiscal year 1986 and fiscal year 1987. For purposes of this paragraph, the average cost for the system in those fiscal years may be increased by the average percentage inflation increase for missile procurement during those fiscal years. SEC. 109. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY PROVIDED SECRETARY OF DEFENSE IN CONNECTION WITH THE NATO AWACS PROGRAM - Effective as of October 1, 1987, section 103(a) of the Department of Defense Authorization Act, 1982 (Public Law 97-86; 95 Stat. 1100), is amended by striking out "fiscal year 1987" both places it appears and inserting in lieu thereof "fiscal years 1988 and 1989". PART B—PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS, RESTRICTIONS, AND LIMITATIONS SEC. 111. ARMY PROGRAMS

Contracts.

(a) AHIP SCOUT HEUCOPTER.—Funds appropriated or otherwise made available for fiscal year 1988 for advance procurement of AHIP aircraft may not be obligated unless the Secretary of Defense, based on operational test results, determines that the AHIP aircraft is the most cost-effective scout helicopter available to the Army and certifies that determination to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives. (b) STINGER MISSILE.—Section 107(e) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1987 (Public Law 99-661; 100 Stat. 3827) is repealed. (c) RDX FACILITY.—The Secretary of the Army may award one or more contracts, in advance of appropriations therefor, for the design and construction of an RDX manufacturing plant if each such contract limits the amount of payments that the United States is obligated to make under such contract to the amount of appropriations available, at the time such contract is awarded, for obligation under such contract. Such design and construction may be accomplished by using one-step turn-key selection procedures, or other competitive contracting methods. (d) FORWARD AREA AIR DEFENSE HEAVY SYSTEM.—(1) Funds appropriated or otherwise made available for the Army for procurement may not be obligated or expended for the procurement of any air defense system submitted to the Army for evaluation in response to any Army request for proposal for the Forward Area Air Defense Line-of-Sight Forward-Heavy (LOS-F-H) system unless the Secretary of Defense certifies to Congress that the system has met or exceeded full system requirements. (2) For purposes of paragraph (1), the term "full system requirements" means the most stringent system requirements specified by any request for proposal for accuracy, range (detection, tracking and engagement), reaction time, and operations in the presence of elec* tronic countermeasures.
 * rt; •:#>i^'^T eJifl^aS

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 101 Part 2.djvu/51

 PUBLIC LAW 100-180—DEC. 4, 1987

101 STAT. 1037

(3) The Secretary of the Army may not obligate funds for advance Reports. procurement of the system referred to in paragraph (1) until— (A) the operational tests of the system are completed and the Secretary of Defense reports to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives on the results of such testing and the evaluation of such testing; (B) the Secretary of Defense certifies to those committees that the system satisfactorily demonstrates that it meets or exceeds all of the operational performance criteria established for the system; (C) the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation of the Department of Defense submits to the Secretary of Defense and those committees a report giving the Director's evaluation of the results of such testing and evaluation; and (D) the Comptroller General submits a report to those committees giving his assessment of the operational tests and the system performance. (e) A-6 AIRCRAFT CONFIGURATION.—None of the funds appropriated for the procurement of aircraft for the Navy for fiscal year 1988 or 1989 may be obligated or expended for procurement of any A-6 aircraft configured in the F model configuration (as described in connection with the A-6E/A-6F aircraft program in the Selected Acquisition Report submitted to Congress for the quarter ending December 31, 1986). SEC. 112. NAVY PROVISIONS (a) H-53

SUPER STALUON HEUCOPTER AIRCRAFT.—(1) Of

the

amount appropriated for procurement of aircraft for the Navy for fiscal year 1988, $25,000,000 shall be available only for safety-related modifications of the H-53 series aircraft. (2) Of the amount appropriated for the Navy for fiscal year 1988 Reports. for the procurement of H-53 aircraft, not more than 30 percent of such funds may be obligated until the Secretary of the Navy submits to Congress a report containing the preliminary results of dynamic structural tests on the H-53 aircraft and the recommendations of the Secretary regarding the advisability of continuing procurement of such aircraft. (3) The Secretary of the Navy may not accept delivery of any Super Stallion C/MH-53E helicopter contracted for using funds appropriated for a fiscal year after fiscal year 1987 unless the helicopter incorporates design chsmges to improve flight stability that are approved by the Secretary of the Navy based upon recommendations resulting from the flight stability deficiency correction program for such helicopter being carried out as of May 18, 1987. (b) P-3 AIRCRAFT.—From funds appropriated or otherwise made available for procurement of aircraft for the Navy or for procurement for the reserve components for fiscal year 1988, the Secretary of the Navy may not obligate more than a total of $207,011,000 for— (1) procurement of P-3C aircraft; and (2) modifications to existing P-3 aircraft. (c) LAND-BASED TANKERS.—Funds appropriated or otherwise made available for the Navy may not be obligated or expended for the purpose of acquiring or operating land-based tanker aircraft unless the Secretary of Defense certifies to Congress that the Department of the Air Force cannot support the requirements of the Navy for land-based tanker aircraft. For the purposes of this section, the KC-

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 101 Part 2.djvu/52

 101 STAT. 1038

PUBLIC LAW 100-180—DEC. 4, 1987

130T aircraft operated by the Marine Corps is not considered a landbased tanker aircraft. (d) OBOGS SYSTEM.—Any aircraft procured under the F-14D aircraft program using funds made available for fiscal year 1988, and any aircraft procured under the FA-18 aircraft program using funds made available for fiscal year 1989, shall be configured to incorporate an On Board Oxygen Generating System (OBOGS). (e) LEASE OR CHARTER OF NEW TANKERS.—Subject to section 2401 of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of the Navy may enter into long-term leases and charters for military useful tanker vessels constructed in the United States. SEC. 113. AIR FORCE PROVISIONS

C!ontract8.

(a) T-46 FUNDS.—(1) Funds appropriated for procurement of aircraft for the Air Force that were originally provided for the terminated T-46 program (as such funds are described in paragraph (2)) shall, to the extent provided in appropriation Acts, be made available for aircraft programs of the Navy as described in paragraph (3) and may not be used for any other purpose. (2) Funds to be made available for the purposes described in paragraph (3) are as follows: (A) $149,000,000 appropriated for fiscal year 1986. (B) $151,000,000 appropriated for fiscal year 1987. (3) Funds provided for Navy aircraft programs under this subsection shall be used as follows: (A) $146,700,000 for procurement of EA6-B Prowler aircraft. (B) $4,900,000 for advance procurement of EA-6B Prowler aircraft (C) $12,600,000 for EA-6B spares. (D) $42,400,000 for A-6 aircraft modifications. (E) $48,700,000 ($38,439,000) for E-2 aircraft modifications. (4) Funds appropriated or otherwise made available for the Air Force for fiscal years 1986 and 1987 may not be obligated or expended for procurement of the T-46 aircraft (other than those aircraft under contract on the date of the enactment of this Act for lot one aircraft) or in connection with a competition for trainer aircraft. (b) TRANSFER OF OTHER PROCUREMENT AIR FORCE FUNDS.—Of

funds appropriated for other procurement for the Air Force for fiscal year 1987 that are available for the BDU-50 practice bomb, $8,000,000 shall, to the extent provided in appropriations Acts, be made available for other procurement for the Navy for fiscal year 1988 and shall be used only for procurement of BDU-45 practice bombs. (c) PAVE TIGER SYSTEM.—The amount of $95,800,000 authorized for research, development, test, and evaluation for the Air Force for fiscal year 1985 for which funds were appropriated is hereby reauthorized for procurement of the PAVE Tiger System, and such funds may not be used for any other purpose. (d) GROUND COLUSION AVOIDANCE SYSTEMS FOR TRANSPORT AIR-

CRAFT.—(1) Except as provided by paragraph (2), any transport aircraft purchased or modified using funds provided to the Department of Defense for fiscal year 1988 for procurement of aircraft shall, as acquired or modified, be equipped with ground collision avoidance systems. (2) The limitation in paragraph (1) does not apply to the following cases:

<•; ®tt:? i r * ^ «•;• •.•:;•:• •••-,'N:.: -v.:--.!*-^^^:^:;!

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 101 Part 2.djvu/53

 PUBLIC LAW 100-180—DEC. 4, 1987

101 STAT. 1039

•

(A) The modification of aircraft for Special Operations Forces. (B) The purchase or modification of aircraft already equipped with ground collision avoidance capabilities comparable or superior to those required under paragraph (1). (C) The purchase or modification of aircraft undergoing modifications on the date of the enactment of this Act if, in a given case, the interruption of the modification schedule would result in either increased costs or production breaks. (3) Not later than February 1, 1988, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report setting forth the Secretary's plan for the purchase or modificacion of transport aircraft equipped with ground collision avoidance systems as required by paragraph (1). (e) A-7 CLOSE AIR SUPPORT AIRCRAFT.—(1) Funds appropriated or otherwise made available to the Air Force for fiscal year 1988 for procurement of aircraft may not be obligated for the procurement of equipment, facilities, or services for the modification of A-T aircraft under the A-7 Plus program in excess of $10,000,000 until— (A) the Secretary of Defense certifies to Congress, in writing, that— (i) obligation of funds for such procurement will not adversely affect full and open competition in the A-7 close air support program; and (ii) the A-7 plus aircraft is the most cost-effective alternative for modernizing existing close air support and battlefield air interdiction assets of the Department of Defense and contributing to meeting the requirements relating to close air support and battlefield air interdiction established by the Secretary of Defense; (B) the results of the vulnerability study required by the Secretary of Defense with respect to that aircraft demonstrate that the upgraded A-7 plus aircraft meets the vulnerability requirements for that aircraft established by the Secretary; (C) the Secretary of Defense submits the report required by paragraph (2); and (D) a period of 10 calendar days expires after the date on which that report is received. (2) Not later than October 1, 1988, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives a report containing a master plan for meeting the requirements established by the Secretary relating to close air support and battlefield air interdiction. The master plan submitted— (A) must have been approved by the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition; and (B) shall specify the requirements with respect to equipment, costs, schedule, and acquisition strategy and the roles for active and reserve forces in each of the Armed Forces under the jurisdiction of the Secretary for meeting those requirements. (f) T-37 MODIFICATION.—(1) Funds appropriated or otherwise made available to the Air Force for fiscal year 1988 for procurement of aircraft may not (except as provided under paragraph (3)) be obligated for the T-37 modification program until— (A) the Secretary of Defense submits the report required by paragraph (2); and

Reports,

Reports,

Reports,

Reports.

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 101 Part 2.djvu/54

 101 STAT. 1040

Reports.

83" 4«jt

PUBLIC LAW 100-180—DEC. 4, 1987

(B) a period of 10 calendar days expires after the date on which that report is received. (2) Not later than February 1, 1988, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives a report containing a master plan for meeting the requirements of the Air Force for undergraduate pilot training. The master plan submitted— (A) must have been approved by the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition; (B) shall specify the requirements with respect to equipment, costs, schedule, and acquisition strategy for meeting those requirements of the Air Force; and (C) shall address the most cost-effective means for meeting those requirements, including the feasibility of joint service programs. (3) The limitation in paragraph (1) does not apply with respect to the obligation of funds for a modification solely related to flight safety purposes, but such funds may not be obligated for such a modiflcation until the Secretary of Defense submits a certification in writing to the committees named in paragraph (2) that the modification for which the funds are to be obligated is a modification solely related to flight safety purposes. PARTC—MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS SEC. 121. ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY BOMBER PROGRAM (a) ESTABLISHMENT OF CoST, PERFORMANCE, AND MANAGEMENT

.«0:.''-»x'»Sf

INITIATIVE.—The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, shall establish an initiative for maintaining cost discipline, contractor performance discipline, and management discipline within the Advanced Technology Bomber program. (b) REQUIRED ELEMENTS OF INITIATIVE.—The initiative under subsection (a) shall include the following elements: (1) The creation of a management plan for the program under which decisions to commit to specified levels of production are linked to progress in meeting specified program milestones, including testing milestones. (2) The creation of a program for promoting greater interaction on management and performance issues between the prime contractor and major program subcontractors. (3) The establishment of a senior management review group to report directly to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition on the status of aircraft capability, program management, schedule, and cost. (4) The use of competition on an ongoing basis. (c) REPORT ON INITIATIVE.—Not later than April 1, 1988, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives a report on the initiative required by subsection (a). The report shall include a description of the measures taken to that time to implement the initiative, including actions taken with respect to each of the elements specified in subsection (b), and a description of the criteria and milestones to be used in evaluating actual program perforinance against specified program performance. <,v>

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 101 Part 2.djvu/55

 PUBLIC LAW 100-180—DEC. 4, 1987

101 STAT. 1041

(d) RESTRICTION ON FUNDS.—(1) The Secretary of the Air Force shall transfer to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition an amount specified by the Under Secretary not to exceed $10,000,000 to be available only for the purposes of subsection (a). Such amount shall be derived from funds provided for procurement of aircraft for the Air Force for fiscal year 1988. (2) If the initiative required by subsection (a) is not implemented by October 1, 1988, funds may not be obligated after that date for the Advanced Technology Bomber program until the initiative is implemented. (e) REPORT ON IOC CAPABIUTIES.—(1) Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives a report on the expected capabilities of the Advanced Technology Bomber when it achieves initial operational capability. The report shall be prepared in consultation with the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition. (2) The report shall include a description of— (A) the performance of the aircraft and its subsystems; ^ (B) expected mission capability; (C) required maintenance and logistical standards; (D) expected levels of crew training and performance; and (E) product improvements that are planned before the initial operational capability of the aircraft to be made after the initial operational capability of the aircraft.

J9jij«}««

-*' t'*^^
 * r.a':n<':>

SEC. 122. REPORT ON CONDITION OF CERTAIN C-130 AIRCRAFT

(a) INSPECTION.—The Secretary of the Air Force shall inspect the Georgia. eight C-130H aircraft stored since 1974 at Air Force Plant No. 6 in Marietta, Georgia, in order to determine the current condition of such aircraft and the work required to return such aircraft to operating status. (b) REPORT.—The Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives a report on the inspection under subsection (a). The report shall include the Secretary's estimate of the amount it would cost to put such aircraft in useful service for the Air National Guard. The report shall be submitted not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. SEC. 123. BRADLEY FIGHTING VEHICLE (a) LIMITATION OF FUNDS AND PLAN TO IMPROVE SURVIVABILITY AND OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE.—Funds appropriated for fiscal

year 1988 may not be obligated or expended to procure any Bradley Fighting Vehicles until a period of 15 days of continuous session of Congress has passed after the last of the following occurs: (1) The tests of the Bradley Fighting Vehicle required by Reports. section 121(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1987 (Public Law 99-661; 100 Stat. 3829) are completed and the Secretary of Defense submits to Congress the report on the results of such tests required by section 121(f)(l) of such Act. (2) The Secretary of Defense certifies to Congress in writing that the survivability modifications selected by the Secretary for the Bradley Fighting Vehicle maximize casualty reductions while considering nscal concerns and without jeopardizing operational effectiveness.

Hi-ipq^B

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 101 Part 2.djvu/56

 101 STAT. 1042

PUBLIC LAW 100-180—DEC. 4, 1987

Reports.

(3) The Secretary of Defense submits to Congress a report containing— (A) a plan for the incorporation of the survivability modifications selected into all Bradley Fighting Vehicles intended for use in combat and a further plan for the incorporation of such modifications into the maximum number of Bradley Fighting Vehicles for which such incorporation is operationally warranted and feasible; (B) a plan for initiation of production or development efforts, as appropriate, for such modifications not later than May 1, 1988; and (U) a description of each survivability modification considered by the Secretary (including those not selected) and the relative costs (including logistics and storage) and the schedules of each such modification, a schedule for completion of the modifications selected, and the rationale for not selecting those modifications that were considered but not selected. (4) The Secretary of Defense submits to Congress a report— (A) identifying those instances (including deficient swim capability, transmission failures, electrical problems with the vehicle and turret distribution boxes, and inadequacies in the Integrated Sight Unit and TOW missile launchers) in which— (i) there are reliability, quality, or operational problems; (ii) the vehicle does not meet the military requirements specified for the vehicle in a program contract;

Reports. Contracts.

,;:-

,i.• "

o r

?t

(iii) the performance of a Government contractor under a program contract is deficient; and (B) setting forth a plan to correct each instance identified under subparagraph (A). (b) REVIEW BY COMPTROLLER GENERAL.—The Comptroller General shall— (1) review all materials of the Department of Defense used to develop the certification submitted under subsection (a)(2) and the reports submitted under subsections (a)(3) and (a)(4); and (2) not later than 30 days after the date on which the last of such certification and reports is submitted, submit to Congress a report giving the assessment of the Comptroller General as to the conclusions and recommendations of the Secretary of Defense in the reports and certifications submitted pursuant to subsection (a).

Reports.

(c) CONTINUITY OF SESSION.—For purposes of determining the

it

period of 15 days of continuous session of Congress specified in subsection (a)— (1) the continuity of a session of Congress is broken only by an adjournment of the Congress sine die; and (2) days on which either House is not in session because of an adjournment of more than three days to a day certain are excluded in the computation of such period. SEC. 124. LIMITATION ON PROCUREMENT WEAPONS ANTIDOTE

OF CERTAIN

CHEMICAL

(a) LIMITATION.—Section 2400 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 101 Part 2.djvu/57

 PUBLIC LAW 100-180—DEC. 4, 1987

101 STAT. 1043

(1) by inserting "(a) BUSES.—" before "Funds appropriated"; and (2) by adding at the end the following; "Qi) CHEMICAL WEAPONS ANTIDOTE MANUFACTURED OVERSEAS.—

Funds appropriated to the Department of Defense may not be used for the procurement of chemical weapons antidote contained in automatic injectors (or for the procurement of the components for such injectors) determined to be critical under the Industrial Preparedness Planning Program of the Department of Defense unless— "(1) such injector or component is manufactured in the United States by a company which is an existing producer under the industrial preparedness program at the time the contract is awarded and which— "(A) has received all required regulatory approvals; and "(B) has the plant, equipment, and personnel to perform Contracts. the contract in existence in the United States at the time the contract is awarded; or "(2) the Secretary of Defense, acting through the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, determines that such procurement from a source in addition to a source described in paragraph (1) is critical to the national security.". (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.—(1) The heading of such section is amended to read as follows: "§ 2400. Miscellaneous procurement limitations". (2) The item relating to that section in the table of sections at the beginning of chapter 141 of such title is amended to read as follows: "2400. Miscellaneous procurement limitations.". SEC. 125. REVISION OF CHEMICAL DEMILITARIZATION PROGRAM

(a) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this section, the term "chemical stockpile demilitarization program" means the program established by section 1412 of the Department of Defense Authorization Act, 1986 (50 U.S.C. 1521), to provide for the destruction of the United States' stockpile of lethal chemical agents and munitions. (b) ENVIRONMENTAL

IMPACT

STATEMENT.—The

Secretary

50 USC 1521 note.

of

Defense shall issue the final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement on the chemical stockpile demilitarization program by January 1, 1988, The Environmental Impact Statement shall be prepared in accordance with all applicable laws. (c) DISPOSAL TECHNOLOGIES.—(1) Funds appropriated pursuant to this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 1988 for the chemical stockpile demilitarization program may not be obligated for procurement or for an Army military construction project at a military installation or facility inside the continental United States until the Secretary of Defense certifies to Congress in writing that the concept plan under the program includes the following: (A) Evaluation of alternate technologies for disposal of the existing stockpile and selection of the technology or technologies to be used for such purpose. (B) Full-scale operational verification of the technology or technologies selected for such disposal. '(C) Maximum protection for public health and the environment.

Health and medical care. Environment.

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 101 Part 2.djvu/58

 101 STAT. 1044 Research and development.

PUBLIC LAW 100-180—DEC. 4, 1987

(2) The limitation in paragraph (1) shall not apply with respect to ^j^^ obligation of funds for the technology evaluation or development program. (d) ALTERNATIVE CONCEPT PLAN.—The Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives an alternative concept plan for the chemical stockpile demilitarization program. The alternative concept plan shall— (2) specify any revised schedule or revised funding requirement necessary to enable the Secretary to meet the requirements of subsections (b) and (c). The alternative concept plan shall be submitted by March 15, 1988. (e) SURVEILLANCE A N D ASSESSMENT P R O G R A M. — The Secretary of
 * «^r ^ (1) incorporate the requirements of subsections (b) and (c); and

 * 5fL. rK>

50 USC 1513

Defense shall conduct a n ongoing comprehensive program of— (1) surveillance of the existing United States stockpile of >n chemical weapons; and (2) assessment of the condition of the stockpile. SEC. 126. WITHDRAWAL OF EUROPEAN CHEMICAL STOCKPILE

Chemical munitions of the United States stored in Europe on the date of the enactment of this Act should not be removed from Europe unless such munitions are replaced contemporaneously with binary chemical munitions stationed on the soil of at leeist one European member nation of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. 10 USC 2432

SEC. 127. SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORTS FOR CERTAIN PROGRAMS (a) SAR

r<?sr '•\PM.. I'.'o;-;

COVERAGE FOR A T B, ACM,

AND ATA

PROGRAMS.—The

Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives at the end of each fiscal year quarter a Selected Acquisition Report with respect to each program referred to in subsection (b), notwithstanding that such a report would not otherwise be required under section 2432 of title 10, United States Code. (b) COVERED PROGRAMS.—Subsection (a) applies to the Advanced Technology Bomber program, the Advanced Cruise Missile program, and the Advanced Tactical Aircraft program. (c) SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT DEFINED.—As used in subsection (a), the term "Selected Acquisition Report" means a report containing the information referred to in section 2432 of title 10, United States Code. SEC. 128. REPORT ON STRATEGIC BOMBER FORCE COMPOSITION

x

(a) REPORT REQUIREMENT.—The Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives a report updating the 1986 Strategic Bomber Force Study. The report shall include— (1) the total number of advanced technology bombers required for the strategic bomber force; /; (2) the Secretary's assessment of the effect of potential arms control developments on the bomber force; ii' (3) a description of any current plans for the use of the B-IB aircraft as a dedicated stand-off mission aircraft; iH 9d (4) a description of plans for retirement of the current B-52 and FB-111 fleets; and

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 101 Part 2.djvu/59

 PUBLIC LAW 100-180—DEC. 4, 1987

101 STAT. 1045

(5) an assessment as to the potential for changes in the Soviet threat and other factors that may affect the capabilities of the strategic bomber force to penetrate Soviet air defenses, (b) DEADLINE FOR REPORT.—The report required by subsection (a) shall be submitted not later than April 1, 1988. SEC. 129. HEMTT TRUCK PROGRAM

(a) PROGRAM AUTHORIZATION.—Beginning in fiscal year 1988, the Contracts. Secretary of the Army shall procure not less than 4,737 trucks under the Heavy Expanded Mobility Tactical Truck (HEMTT) program. Such procurement shall be carried out using multiyear contracts in accordance with section 2306(h) of title 10, United States Code. (b) FUNDING.—Of amounts appropriated for each of fiscal years 1988 and 1989 for other procurement for the Army for tactical vehicles, $239,300,000 shall be available only for procurement under subsection (a).

TITLE U—RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION PART A—AUTHORIZATIONS AND PROGRAM LIMITATIONS SEC. 201. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 1988 and for fiscal year 1989 for the use of the Armed Forces for research, development, test, and evaluation as follows: (1) For the Army: (A) $5,281,008,000 ($5,204,338,000) for fiscal year 1988. (B) $2,763,326,000 for fiscal year 1989. (2) For the Navy (including the Marine Corps): (A) $9,947,151,000 ($9,638,995,000) for fiscal year 1988. (B) $2,896,358,000 for fiscal year 1989. (3) For the Air Force: (A) $16,861,976,000 ($15,114,635,000) for fiscal year 1988. (B) $3,464,376,000 for fiscal year 1989. (4) For the Defense Agencies: (A) $8,145,176,000 ($8,060,558,000) for fiscal year 1988. (B) $1,881,428,000 for fiscal year 1989. (5) For testing activities: (A) For the activities of the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense, Test and Evaluation: (i) $184,693,000 ($173,479,000) for fiscal year 1988. (ii) $175,244,000 for fiscal year 1989. (B) For the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation: (i) $91,221,000 for fiscal year 1988. (ii) $104,221,000 for fiscal year 1989. SEC. 202. LIMITATION ON FUNDS FOR THE ARMY

(a) AAWS-M AND MILAN II PROGRAMS.—(1) Of the funds appropriated pursuant to section 201 for the Army for fiscal year 1988, not more than $18,000,000 may be obligated for the Advanced Anti-Tank Weapon System-Medium (AAWS-M) program until the Secretary of the Army certifies to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives that the Army has completed the Milan II evaluation.

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 101 Part 2.djvu/60

 101 STAT. 1046

PUBLIC LAW 100-180—DEC. 4, 1987

(2) For purposes of paragraph (1), the term "Milan II evaluation" means evaluation of the Milan II system as an interim alternative medium-range anti-tank weapons system, as directed in the joint explanatory statement of the committee of conference accompanying the conference report on House Joint Resolution 738 (House Report 99-1005, page 555). Such evaluation shall be based on full operational testing of the Milan II system. (b) ANTI-TACTICAL MISSILE SYSTEMS.—Of the funds appropriated pursuant to section 201 for the Army for fiscal year 1988, $26,501,000 shall be available for the anti-tactical missile system program, of which $10,000,000 shall be available only for the development of a capability to enable the Patriot and Hawk air defense systems for the anti-tactical missile role to exchange data and to otherwise communicate. (c) CHEMICAL WEAPONS CONVENTION COMPLIANCE MONITORING

Reports.

PROGRAM.—Of the funds appropriated for the Army for fiscal year 1988 for research, development, test, and evaluation, $6,800,000 shall be available only to conduct a program to develop and demonstrate compliance monitoring capabilities in support of the Convention on the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons proposed by the United States in the Conference on Disarmament. (d) STINGER ELECTRONIC SECURITY SYSTEM.—Of the funds appropriated for the Army for fiscal year 1988 for research, development, test, and evaluation, $3,000,000 shall be available only for purposes of demonstrating and testing alternative electronic safety devices that can be installed or retrofitted on Stinger air defense missiles in both the basic Stinger configuration and the reprogrammable microprocessor configuration. The Secretary of the Army shall summarize the results of the demonstration and testing on the basic Stinger configuration and submit a report to Congress on such summary not later than July 1, 1988, and shall summarize the results of the demonstration and testing on the reprogrammable microprocessor configuration and submit a report to Congress on such summary not later than January 1, 1989. (e) RIFLE-LAUNCHED MUNITIONS.—Of the funds appropriated to the Army pursuant to section 201 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1987 (Public Law 99-661), $11,827,000 may be obligated only for a lighweight rifle-launched anti-armor munitions program approved by the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Forces and Low Intensity Conflict. SEC. 203. LIMITATION ON FUNDS FOR THE NAVY

Research and development. Reports.

(a) A-6 AIRCRAFT CONFIGURATION.—None of the funds appropriated pursuant to section 201 for research, development, test, and evaluation for the Navy may be obligated or expended for the purpose of configuring the A-6 aircraft in the F model configuration (as described in connection with the A-6E/A-6F aircraft program in the Selected Acquisition Report submitted to Congress for the quarter ending December 31, 1986). (b) PROHIBITION ON TESTING ELECTROMAGNETIC PULSE IN CHESAPEAKE BAY.—During fiscal year 1988, the Secretary of the Navy may

not carry out an electromagnetic pulse program in the Chesapeake Bay area in connection with the Electromagnetic Pulse Radiation Environment Simulator Program for ships (EMPRESS).

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 101 Part 2.djvu/61

 PUBLIC LAW 100-180—DEC. 4, 1987

101 STAT. 1047

SEC. 204. LIMITATION ON FUNDS FOR THE AIR FORCE

(a) MISCELLANEOUS LIMITATIONS.—Of the funds appropriated pursuant to section 201 for the Air Force for fiscal year 1988— (1) $15,000,000 shall be available only for Non-Acoustic Antisubmarine Warfare related activity; (2) $50,000,000 shall be available only for the Pave Tiger program; and (3) $94,967,000 shall be available only for the Manufacturing Technology (MANTECH) program, of which $10,000,000 shall be available only for programs associated with the revitalization of the United States machine tool industry. GD) F-4D AIR DEFENSE AIRCRAFT.—The Secretary of the Air Force may spend not more than $30,000,000 to complete development of a derivative of the F-4D aircraft for the air defense mission. Funds to be used for such purpose are funds appropriated to the Air Force for fiscal year 1985 for research, development, test, and evaluation but not authorized. SEC. 205. LIMITATION ON FUNDS FOR DEFENSE AGENCIES

(a) SPECIFIED ACTIVITIES.—Of the funds appropriated pursuant to section 201 for the Defense Agencies for fiscal year 1988— (1) $288,000,000 shall be available only to the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency for Strategic Technology, of which— (A) $5,500,000 shall be available only for optical processor (B) $50,000,000 shall be available only for the Light Sat program, and (C) $4,000,000 shall be available only for the Amos Large Optical System program; (2) $15,000,000 shall be available only for X-Ray lithography (3) $5,000,000 shall be available only for the Rankine Cycle Energy Recovery (RACER) system. 0}) LANDSAT PROGRAM.—Of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available to the Defense Agencies for research, development, test, and evaluation for fiscal years 1988 and 1989, funds shall be provided to the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Command, Control, Communications, and Intelligence to be used for LANDSAT data acquisition and for development of LANDSAT satellites numbers 6 and 7 (including launch costs) as follows: (1) For fiscal year 1988, $15,000,000. (2) For fiscal year 1989, $45,000,000. (c) UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES.—Of the funds appropriated pursuant to section 201 for the Defense Agencies— (1) $190,000,000 ($185,000,000) shall be available only for the University Research Initiatives (URI) program in fiscal year 1988, of which $25,000,000 is for the Defense Agencies for the Defense University Instrimientation Program; and (2) $210,000,000 shall be available only for that program in fiscal year 1989. (d) BIOENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS RESEARCH.—Of the funds appropriated pursuant to section 201, not more than $33,000,000 ($25,000,000) may be obligated through the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition for bioenvironmental hazards research activities at universities (including amounts for associated facilities and other related purposes).

^

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 101 Part 2.djvu/62

 101 STAT. 1048

PUBLIC LAW 100-180—DEC. 4, 1987

SEC. 206. FUNDING FOR TECHNOLOGY BASE PROGRAMS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1988

" Of the funds appropriated pursuant to section 201, the following amounts are available only for technology base programs: (1) For the Army: (A) $764,862,000 of funds authorized for fiscal year 1988. (B) $839,852,000 of funds authorized for fiscal year 1989. (2) For the Navy: (A) $748,781,000 of funds authorized for fiscal year 1988. "^t (B) $832,587,000 of funds authorized for fiscal year 1989. (3) For the Air Force: (A) $773,220,000 ($761,992,000) of funds authorized for fiscal year 1988. ,7 (B) $839,444,000 of funds authorized for fiscal year 1989. ' (4) For the Defense Agencies: ' *' ' (A) $1,186,430,000 ($1,181,430,000) of funds authorized for fiscal year 1988. (B) $838,918,000 of funds authorized for fiscal year 1989. SEC. 207. FUNDS FOR COOPERATIVE PROJECTS WITH MAJOR NON-NATO ALLIES

Of the funds appropriated pursuant to the authorizations of appropriations for fiscal year 1988 in section 201, up to $40,000,000 shall be available for cooperative research and development projects with major non-NATO allies under section 1105 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1987 (Public Law 99-961), 10 USC 2431 note. President of U.S. Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.

SEC. 208. ONE-YEAR UNITED STATES MORATORIUM ON TESTING ANTISATELLITE WEAPONS (a) TESTING MORATORIUM.—The Secretary of Defense may not

carry out a test of the Space Defense System (antisatellite weapon) involving the F-15 launched miniature homing vehicle against an object in space until the President certifies to Congress that the Soviet Union has conducted, after the date of the enactment of this Act, a test against an object in space of a dedicated antisatellite weapon. (b) EXPIRATION.—The prohibition in subsection (a) expires on October 1, 1988. PART B—PROGRAM POUCIES

- .»

SEC. 211. NAVY ATTACK SUBMARINE PROGRAM Research and development.

(a) ADVANCED SUBMARINE TECHNOLOGY,—(1) There is hereby established an Advanced Submarine Technology Program to be carried out by the Secretary of Defense through the Director, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. In c a n i n g out the program, the Director shall conduct research, development, test, and evaluation of advcmced submarine technology that may be applied to submarines of the SSN-688 class, SSN-21 class, or other classes of submarines. Technology to be examined through the program includes technology relating to polymers, compliant coating, propulsion, techniques for hull drag reduction, materials, weapon control systems, acoustic and nonacoustic signature reduction, and sensors. (2) The objective of the program shall be to obtain prototype hardware of promising submarine technologies in the shortest possible time.

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 101 Part 2.djvu/63

 PUBLIC LAW 100-180—DEC. 4, 1987

101 STAT. 1049

(3) Of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available to the Navy for fiscal year 1988 for research, development, test, and evaluation, $100,000,000 shall be made available to the Director, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency for the advsmced submarine technology program. The Secretary of Defense shall make such amount available to the Director within 30 days after enactment of a law making appropriations for fiscal year 1988 for research, development, test, and evaluation for the Navy. (b) REPORT REQUIREMENT.—(1) Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives a report setting forth a detailed plan for the conduct of the program. The report shall include— (A) information on the technologies to be studied and developed, (B) milestones for significant achievements, (C) plans for prototype hardware development, and (D) a description of anticipated costs. (2) Not later than six months after the submission of the report required by paragraph (1), the Secretary of Defense shall submit a report updating the information in the initial report, including any additional information the Secretary considers appropriate to the conduct of the program. (c) LIMITATION ON FUNDS.—None of the funds appropriated pursu- Reports. " >*^ ant to this or any other Act for the research and development of the SSN-21 Seawolf Attack Submarine program may be obligated or expended during any period of time in which a report required by subsection (b) is overdue. (d) CONCEPT STUDIES FOR S S N - 6 8 8 IMPROVEMENT.—Of the funds appropriated pursuant to section 201 for the Navy for fiscal year 1988, $13,000,000 shall be available only for concept and design studies, together with cost estimates, for accomplishing the following on SSN-688 Los Angeles class submarines: (1) Providing greater operational/tactical and maximum speed than the present SSN-688 class submarine. (2) Using HY-100 steel to permit greater operational depths. (3) Providing greater acoustic and nonacoustic quieting. (4) Providing greater weapons carrying capacity than either the SSN-688 submarine or the proposed SSN-21 submarine. (e) INDEPENDENT STUDIES.—The Secretary of Defense shall obtain Reports. an independent concept study in accordance with subsection (d) from two qualified independent shipbuilders and shall provide the results of the Navy concept study and of the shipbuilders' studies, together with development and deplo3anent schedules and cost estimates under each, to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives not later than March 1, 1988. SEC. 212. ADVANCED TACTICAL FIGHTER AIRCRAFT

None of the funds appropriated for fiscal year 1988 or otherwise made available may be obligated for development of the Advanced Tactical Fighter aircraft program until— (1) the Secretary of the Navy certifies to the Secretary of Defense that the prototype aircraft designs are capable of accepting all physical and structural modifications necessary to satisfy fully the requirements of the Navy concerning carrier catapults and arresting gear, and

\

- " ' "'> ' '"^'^"^ ' " ' ^ i %_ "'^

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 101 Part 2.djvu/64

 101 STAT. 1050

PUBLIC LAW 100-180—DEC. 4, 1987 (2) the Secretary of Defense submits to the Committees on Armed Services and Appropriations of the Senate and House of Representatives a copy of the certification under paragraph (1) and certifies that a major source selection criteria for full scale development and production will be the extent to which the contractor's proposals for the Navy-variant of the advanced tactical fighter meets fully the requirements of the Navy.

SEC. 213. ELECTRONIC WARFARE PROGRAMS

(a) FUNDING.—Of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available to the Department of Defense for research, development, test, and evaluation for fiscal year 1988, not more than $539,235,000 ($482,472,000) may be used for electronic warfare programs as provided in subsection OD). Ob) ALLOCATION OF FUNDS.—The Secretary of Defense shall allocate among the military departments funds appropriated for fiscal year 1988 for electronic warfare programs as follows: (1) For the Department of the Army, $103,804,000 ($92,877,000). (2) For the Department of the Navy, $235,946,000 ($211,109,000). (3) For the Department of the Air Force, $199,485,000 ($178,486,000). (c) SUBMISSION OF MASTER PLAN.—Not later than March 1, 1988, the Secretary of Defense, acting through the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives a report setting forth a detailed master plan for electronic warfare programs. Such plan shall— (1) describe joint service electronic warfare programs that will satisfy electronic warfare requirements against the current and future threat; and (2) identify those electronic warfare systems that will be terminated.

Reports.

SEC. 214. CONVENTIONAL DEFENSE INITIATIVE

j-h

Research and development. Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.

(a) IN GENERAL.—In this Act, Congress continues the program of Conventional Defense Initiatives begun in the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1987 (Public Law 99-661) for the purposes stated in section 221 of that Act (100 Stat. 3845). (b) ARMY.—Of the funds appropriated pursuant to section 201 for the Army for fiscal year 1988, $48,100,000 shall be available only for the Conventional Defense Initiative. (c) NAVY.—Of the funds appropriated pursuant to section 201 for the Navy for fiscal year 1988, $51,100,000 ($46,100,000) shall be available only for the Conventional Defense Initiative. (d) AIR FORCE.—Of the funds appropriated pursuant to section 201 for the Air Force for fiscal year 1988, $9,600,000 shall be available only for the Conventional Defense Initiative. SEC. 215. BALANCED TECHNOLOGY INITIATIVE

(a) PURPOSE.—It is the purpose of this section to authorize funds for the Balanced Technology Initiative program. (b) PROGRAM Focus.—The focus of the Balanced Technology Initiative program shall be on the development of innovative concepts and methods of enhancing conventional defense capabilities, including the development of concepts and methods to take full advantage

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 101 Part 2.djvu/65

 PUBLIC LAW 100-180—DEC. 4, 1987

101 STAT. 1051

of the technological superiority of the United States and its allies as a means of increasing the rate of obsolescence of equipment, doctrine, and tactics of the Soviet Union and other Warsaw Pact countries. Such development shall give particular emphasis to the following: (1) Armor/anti-armor initiatives. (2) Defenses against armed helicopters. (3) Hjrpervelocity missiles for ground combat use. (4) Defense against anti-ship missiles, including those with "stealth" characteristics. (5) "Smart" mines for both land and ocean warfare. (6) Lightweight, air transportable vehicles with anti-armor capabilities for rapid transport to remote areas. (7) Improved conventional anti-submarine warfare munitions. (8) "Smart" standoff munitions and submunitions for delivery outside of lethal air defense ranges. (c) AMOUNTS AUTHORIZED.—(1) Of the amounts appropriated pursuant to section 201 for fiscal year 1988— (A) not less than $300,000,000 ($275,000,000) shall be obligated only for research and development in connection with those programs, projects, and activities initiated pursuant to section 222 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1987 (Public Law 99-661; 100 Stat. 3845); and (B) not less than $200,000,000 shall be obligated only for research and development under the Balanced Technology Initiative and shall be used only for new and innovative programs, projects, and activities that have not been designated for funding under that section. (2) Of the amounts appropriated pursuant to section 201 for fiscal year 1989, not less than $300,000,000 shall be obligated for research and development in connection with the Balanced Technology Initiative. (d) RELATIONSHIP TO CONVENTIONAL DEFENSE INITIATIVE.—The

Conventional Defense Initiative provided for in section 221 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1987 (Public Law 99-661; 100 Stat. 3845) and for which funds are authorized by section 214 is not an element of the Balanced Technology Initiative. Funds made available for the purpose of this section may not be obligated for any program, project, or activity of the Conventional Defense Initiative. SEC. 216. MILESTONE AUTHORIZATIONS

(a) ARMY TACTICAL MISSILE SYSTEM.—(1) Of the simounts appropriated for the Army for research, development, test, and evaluation for fiscal years 1988 and 1989, $112,208,000 ($102,208,000) of the amount appropriated for fiscal year 1988 and $86,618,000 of the amount appropriated for fiscal year 1989 may be obligated only for the Army Tactical Missile System program. (2) The sum of $49,000,000 is hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Army for fiscal year 1990 for research, development, test, and evaluation in connection with the Army Tactical Missile System program. (b) TRIDENT II MISSILE.—(1) Of the amounts appropriated for the Navy for research, development, test, and evaluation for fisc£d years 1988 and 1989, $1,073,463,000 ($1,048,463,000) of the amount appropriated for fiscal year 1988 and $581,740,000 of the amount appropriated for fiscal year 1989 may be obligated only for the Trident II

91-194 O - 90 - 3: QL.3 Part 2

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 101 Part 2.djvu/66

 101 STAT. 1052

PUBLIC LAW 100-180—DEC. 4, 1987

missile program. In achieving any undistributed reduction required to be made in programs, projects, or activities for which funds have been appropriated to the Department of Defense for fiscal year 1988, no reduction may be made in the amount of funds available for the program described in the preceding sentence. (2) Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Navy for research, development, test, and evaluation of the Trident II missile program as follows: .i- (A) For fiscal year 1990, $338,300,000. (B) For fiscal year 1991, $164,700,000. (C) For fiscal year 1992, $103,000,000. (c) T-45 TRAINING SYSTEM.—(1) Of the amounts appropriated for the Navy for research, development, test, and evaluation for fiscal years 1988 and 1989, $96,015,000 of the amount appropriated for fiscal year 1988 and $87,822,000 of the amount appropriated for fiscal year 1989 may be obligated only for the T-45 Training System program. (2) Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Navy for research, development, test, and evaluation of the T-45 Training System program as follows: (A) For fiscal year 1990, $23,700,000. (B) For fiscal year 1991, $24,000,000. (d) APPLICATION OF SECTION 2437 OF TITLE 10.—Programs referred to in subsections (a) through (c) are defense enterprise programs for the purpose of section 2437 of title 10, United States Code. SEC. 217. ANTI-TACTICAL BALLISTIC MISSILE SYSTEMS AND EXTENDED AIR DEFENSE (a) DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS UNDER S D I PROGRAM.—(1) Of the

Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.

funds appropriated or otherwise made available to the Department of Defense for the Strategic Defense Initiative program for fiscal year 1988, $50,000,000 shall be available only for experiments, demonstration projects, and development relating to anti-tactical ballistic missile (AT^M) systems. (2) Such projects shall be conducted on a matching fund cooperative program basis with United States allies that have signed Memoranda of Understanding (MOU's) for participation in the Strategic Defense Initiative program. (3) Any system developed under this subsection shall be designed to be no less capable than the SA-X-12 system of the Soviet Union. (b) EXTENDED AIR DEFENSE.—(1) Of the funds appropriated to the Army pursuant to section 201, $25,000,000 may be obligated only upon approval by the Director of Defense Research and Engineering for the purpose of research and development in connection with anti-tactical missile systems or extended air defense systems. (2) If any such funds are made available to a firm in an allied country, such funds shall be available for obligation only after the Secretary of Defense enters into a cooperative program with that country for that purpose. SEC. 218. HIGH-TEMPERATURE SUPERCONDUCTIVITY PROGRAM

(a) AUTHORIZATION.—(1) Of the funds appropriated or otherwise made a v ^ a b l e to the Department of Defense pursuant to section 201 for research, development, test, and evaluation, $60,520,000 of the amount appropriated for fiiscal year 1988 and $60,520,000 of the amount appropriated for fiscal year 1989 may be obligated only for

•'SI...J,w

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 101 Part 2.djvu/67

 PUBLIC LAW 100-180—DEC. 4, 1987

101 STAT. 1053

research and development relating to superconductivity at high critical temperatures. (2) Of the amount that may be obligated under paragraph (1), $10,520,000 in the case of fiscal year 1988, and $10,520,000 in the case of fiscal year 1989, may be obligated only for support of research and development activities that— (A) are conducted under the superconductor program of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency of the Department of Defense or under the superconductor program of any other entity involved in superconductor research and development; and (B) accelerate advanced development of superconductor technology to support the Electric Drive program of the Department of Defense. (b) ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS.—(1) The Secretary of Defense

Research and development.

shall determine, with respect to the amounts appropriated or otherwise made available to the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Defense Agencies pursuant to section 201 for research, development, test, and evaluation for each of fiscal years 1988 and 1989, the amount to be derived from the Army, Navy, Air Force, and each of the Defense Agencies in each such fiscal year to carry out the high-temperature superconductivity research and development activities of the Department of Defense under this section. (2) The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Under Secretary 10 USC 2364 note. of Defense for Acquisition, shall— (A) coordinate the research and development activities of the Department of Defense relating to high-temperature superconductivity; and (B) ensure that such research and development— (i) is carried out in coordination with the high-temperature superconductivity research and development activities of the Department of Energy (including the national laboratories of the Department of Energy), the National Science Foundation, the National Bureau of Standards, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration; and (ii) complements rather than duplicates such activities. (c) TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER TO PRIVATE SECTOR.—(1) The Secretary

of Defense, acting through the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, shall take appropriate action to ensure that hightemperature superconductivity technology resulting from the research activities of the Department of Defense is transferred to the private sector. Such transfer shall be made in accordance with section 10(e) of the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 (15 U.S.C. 3710(e)), other applicable provisions of law, and Executive Order Number 12591, dated April 10, 1987. (2) The Secretary of Energy, in consultation with the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, shall ensure that the national laboratories of the Department of Energy participate, to the maximum appropriate extent, in the transfer to the private sector of technology developed under the Department of Defense superconductivity program in the national laboratories. SEC. 219. TRAINING IN ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGIES (a) FUNDS FOR PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF EQUIPMENT.—Of

the funds appropriated pursuant to section 201, not more than $31,000,000 ($25,000,000) of the amount appropriated for fiscal year 1988, and not more than $31,000,000 of the amount appropriated for

10 USC 2363 note. Research and development.

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 101 Part 2.djvu/68

 101 STAT. 1054

Reports.

'f.

PUBLIC LAW 100-180—DEC. 4, 1987

fiscal year 1989, may be obligated for the purchase of high technology manufacturing equipment and the installation of such equipment in a private, nonprofit center for advemced technologies for the purpose of training, in a production facility, machine tool operators in skills critical to the defense technology base to build, operate, and maintain such equipment. Qoi) REQUIREMENTS.—Funds may not be obligated for the purpose described in subsection (a) until— (1) the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Commerce, the i Secretary of Labor, and the Secretary of Education enter into a memorandum of understanding concerning the participation of -^ their respective departments in a project to demonstrate the (2) the Secretary of Defense approves the obligation of such funds for such purpose; and (3) a period of 60 days elapses after the Secretary of Defense ® submits to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and - the House of Representatives a report that sets forth a detailed ^- explanation of proposed Federal expenditures, a description of J the cost-sharing arrangements between the Government agencies concerned and the private sector, and a description of how '* the proposed program furthers the industrial and technological goals of the Department of Defense. SEC. 220. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON STRATEGIC MISSILE MODERNIZATION PROGRAMS
 * training of machine technicians in a production facility;

(a) FINDINGS.—The Congress makes the following findings: (1) It is essential that the nation's defense priorities be carefully analyzed so as to properly fund the Armed Forces. Union of Soviet (2) The capabilities of the conventional forces of the United Socialist States and its allies will become more important if an agreeRepublics. ment with respect to intermediate-range nuclear forces (INF) is ,^ concluded between the United States and the Soviet Union. (3) It is both desirable and possible to reduce the reliance of - the North Atlantic Treaty Organization on nuclear weapons for the defense of all members of the alliance if the member nations .. of the alliance assert the political will to reduce such reliance and establish sound defense priorities. •.KTi>;.. (4) The United States is currently procuring and deploying ., one land-based intercontinental ballistic missile system (the MX, system) at significant cost while developing another such system (the so-called Midgetman system) at significant addi', tional cost. (5) Efforts to reduce the Federal budget deficit, which are \-y imperative for the economic well being of the United States, will continue for the foreseeable future to require limits on all discretionary Federal spending, including defense spending. Research and (b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—In light of the findings in subsection (a), development. jt is the sense of Congress that the authorization of funds in this Act for research and development for both the new small mobile intercontinental ballistic missile (commonly known as the "Midgetman" missile) and the proposed rail-mobile basing mode for the MX missile does not constitute a commitment or express an intent by Congress to provide funds to procure and deploy the Midgetmsm missile or to deploy any MX missiles in a rail-mobile basing mode or both. - ^
 * . J...

�