text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 99 Part 1.djvu/980

 99 STAT. 958

Effective date.

Report.

Prohibition.

Real property.

PUBLIC LAW 99-166—DEC. 3, 1985 personnel area concerned, the Veterans' Administration has a disproportionate number of employees at the salary grade or grades selected for reduction in comparison to the number of such employees at the salary levels involved who perform comparable functions in other departments and agencies of the Federal Government and in non-Federal entities. Any grade reduction described in such report may not take effect until the end of a period of 90 calendar days (not including any day on which either House of Congress is not in session) after the report is received by the committees. "(B) A grade reduction referred to in subparagraph (A) of this paragraph is a systematic reduction, for the purpose of reducing the average salary cost for Veterans' Administration employees described in subparagraph (C) of this paragraph, in the number of such Veterans' Administration employees at a specific grade level. "(C) The employees referred to in subparagraph (B) of this paragraph are— "(i) health-care personnel who are determined by the Administrator to be providing either direct patient-care services or services incident to direct patient-care services; "(ii) individuals who meet the definition of professional employee as set forth in section 7103(a)(15) of title 5; and "(iii) individuals who are employed as computer specialists. "(D) Not later than the forty-fifth day after the Administrator submits a report under subparagraph (A) of this paragraph, the Comptroller General shall submit to such Committees a report on the Administrator's compliance with such subparagraph. The Comptroller General shall include in the report the Comptroller General's opinion as to the accuracy of the Administrator's determination (and of the data supporting such determination) made under such subparagraph. "(E) In the case of Veterans' Administration employees not described in subparagraph (C) of paragraph (3), the Administrator may not in any fiscal year implement a systematic reduction for the purpose of reducing the average salary cost for such Veterans' Administration employees that will result in a reduction in the number of such Veterans' Administration employees at any specific grade level at a rate greater than the rate of the reductions systematically being made in the numbers of employees at such grade level in all other agencies and departments of the Federal Government combined.". SEC. 404. LAND TRANSFER, PHOENIX, ARIZONA.

(a) REQUIREMENT FOR TRANSFER.—The real property described in subsection (b) and the structures on such property on the date of the enactment of this Act shall be transferred without compensation or reimbursement from the control and jurisdiction of the General Services Administration to the control and jurisdiction of the Veterans' Administration. (b) DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The real property referred to in subsection (a) is a tract of land consisting of 3.4 acres, more or less, in Phoenix, Arizona, that— (1) was formerly part of the Veterans' Administration Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona; and (2) was declared to be excess to the needs of the Veterans' Administration in a report to the General Services Administration dated September 25, 1959.

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 99 Part 1.djvu/981

 PUBLIC LAW 99-166—DEC. 3, 1985

99 STAT. 959

SEC. 405. MODIFICATION OF RESTRICTIONS ON REAL PROPERTY, MILWAUKEE COUNTY, WISCONSIN.

(a) RELEASE OF REVERSIONARY INTEREST.—The Administrator of Veterans' Affairs shall execute such instruments as may be necessary to modify the conditions under which the land described in subsection (b) will revert to the United States in order to permit Milwaukee County, Wisconsin, to lease all or part of such land to a nonprofit corporation which— (1) shall construct and equip on such land structures, facilities, and other permanent improvements useful for public recreational purposes or general civic purposes; and (2) shall use such land for such recreational or civic purposes. (b) DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The land referred to in subsection (a) is— (1) the land conveyed to Milwaukee County, Wisconsin, pursuant to the Act entitled "An Act to authorize the Administrator of Veterans' Affairs to convey lands and to lease certain other land to Milwaukee County, Wisconsin", approved September 1, 1949 (63 Stat. 683); and (2) the land conveyed to Milwaukee County, Wisconsin, pursuant to the Act entitled "An Act authorizing the Administrator of Veterans' Affairs to convey certain property to Milwaukee County, Wisconsin", approved August 27, 1954 (68 Stat. 366). (c) GENERAL LIMITATIONS.—The Administrator may carry out this section subject to such terms and conditions (including reservations of rights for the United States) as the Administrator determines to be necessary to protect the interests of the United States. SEC. 406. AUTHORITY TO RELEASE LIMITATION ON USE OF REAL PROPERTY, MCKINNEY, TEXAS.

(a) RELEASE OF LIMITATION.—The Administrator of Veterans' Affairs shall execute such instruments as may be necessary to release the limitation to recreational purposes only on the use of the land described in subsection (b). (b) DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The land referred to in subsection (a) is two parcels of land, consisting of a total of 38.741 acres, that were conveyed by the Administrator to the city of McKinney, Texas, by deed of May 5, 1965, under the authority of Public Law 88-438 (78 Stat. 444, approved August 14, 1964). SEC. 407. MODIFICATION OF RESTRICTIONS ON REAL PROPERTY AND CONVEYANCE OF A FENCE ON SUCH PROPERTY, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH. (a) MODIFICATION OF RESTRICTION.—(1) The Administrator of Veterans' Affairs shall execute such instruments as may be necessary in order to authorize the land conveyed under the authority of the Act referred to in paragraph (3) to be used— (A) without regard to any limitation required by section 2 of that Act, but 68 Stat. 580. (B) subject to the limitations set forth in paragraph (2). (2) Any instrument executed under paragraph (1) shall provide, with respect to the tract of land conveyed under the Act referred to in paragraph (3)— (A) that such tract may be used only for hospital, educational, civic, residential, or related purposes; (B) that, if any part of such tract is used in any manner that is determined by the Administrator to interfere with the care and

�

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 99 Part 1.djvu/982

 99 STAT. 960

PUBLIC LAW 99-166—DEC. 3, 1985 treatment of any patient at a Veterans' Administration healthcare facility located in the reservation described in such Act, such use shall cease immediately upon notice by the Administrator of such interference to the person holding legal title to such part at the time such use occurs; (C) that, if any part of such tract is used for a purpose other than a purpose prescribed in clause (A), title to such part shall revert to the United States; and (D) that, if any interference referred to in clause (B) does net cease as required under such paragraph, title to the part of such land that is being used in a manner to cause such interference shall revert to the United States. Any such instrument may contain such additional terms and conditions (including reservations of rights to the United States) as the Administrator determines to be necessary to protect the interests of the United States. (3) The Act referred to in paragraphs (1) and (2) is the Act entitled "An Act authorizing the Administrator of Veterans' Affairs to convey certain property to the Armory Board, State of Utah", approved July 29, 1954 (68 Stat. 579). (b) CONVEYANCE OF FENCE.—The Administrator shall convey, without consideration, to the Armory Board of the State of Utah all right, title, and interest of the United States in the fence erected as required by the quitclaim deed issued to the Armory Board by the Administrator on Octx)ber 14, 1954. under the authority of the Act referred to in subsection (a)(3). The conveyance shall contain such terms and conditions as the Administrator determines to be necessary to protect the interests of the United States. Approved December 3, 1985.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 505 (S. 876): HOUSE REPORT No. 99-114 (Comm. on Veterans' Affairs). SENATE REPORT No. 99-101 accompanying S. 876 (Comm. on Veterans' Affairs). CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 131 (1985): May 21, considered and passed House. July 30, considered and passed Senate, amended, in lieu of S. 876. Oct. 30, House concurred in Senate amendments with amendment. Nov. 6, 13, Senate concurred in House amendment with amendment. Nov. 14, House concurred in Senate amendments.

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 99 Part 1.djvu/983

 PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985

99 STAT. 961

Public Law 99-167 99th Congress An Act To authorize certain construction at military installations for fiscal year 1986, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled.

Dec. 3, 1985 [S. 1042]

Military

_ „ SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE

Construction Authorization

This Act may be cited as the "MiHtary Construction Authorization Act, 1986". TITLE I—ARMY

^^^' ^^^^

SEC. 101. AUTHORIZED ARMY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS (a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—(1) The Secretary of the Army

Real property.

may acquire real property and may carry out mihtary construction projects in the amounts shown for each of the following installations and locations inside the United States: UNITED STATES ARMY FORCES COMMAND

Fort Bragg, North Carolina, $68,380,000. Fort Campbell, Kentucky, $26,200,000. Fort Carson, Colorado, $5J,350,000. Fort Devens, Massachusetts, $610,000. Fort Drum, New York, $85,490,000. Fort Greely, Alaska, $2,500,000. Fort Hood, Texas, $78,450,000. Fort Hunter-Liggett, California, $11,100,000. Fort Indiantown Gap, Pennsylvania, $5,300,000. Fort Irwin, California, $28,150,000. Fort Lewis, Washington, $104,980,000. Fort McCoy, Wisconsin, $940,000. Fort Meade, Maryland, $18,930,000. Fort Ord, California, $25,820,000. Fort Polk, Louisiana, $27,230,000. Fort Richardson, Alaska, $3,600,000. Fort Riley, Kansas, $49,290,000. Fort Sam Houston, Texas, $1,440,000. Fort Sheridan, Illinois, $3,500,000. Fort Stewart, Georgia, $29,600,000. Fort Wainwright, Alaska, $14,000,000. Presidio of Monterey, California, $2,650,000. Yakima Firing Center, Washingtx)n, $16,430,000. UNITED STATES ARMY WESTERN COMMAND

Fort Shafter, Hawaii, $6,300,000. Pohakuloa Training Area, Hawaii, $2,150,000. Schofield Banacks, Hawaii, $32,460,000.

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 99 Part 1.djvu/984

 99 STAT. 962

PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985 UNITED STATES ARMY TRAINING AND DOCTRINE COMMAND

Fort A.P. Hill, Virginia, $6,450,000. Fort Belvoir, Virginia, $34,300,000. Fort Benjamin Harrison, Indiana, $5,300,000. Fort Benning, Georgia, $39,650,000. Fort Bliss, Texas, $31,760,000. Fort Dix, New Jersey, $6,100,000. Fort Gordon, Georgia, $46,040,000. Fort Jackson, South Carolina, $6,600,000. Fort Knox, Kentucky, $20,770,000. Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, $6,900,000. Fort Lee, Vii^nia, $13,082,000. Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri, $12,350,000. Fort McClellan, Alabama, $39,350,000. Fort;*ickett, Virginia, $420,000. Fort Rucker, Alabama, $11,950,000. Fort Sill, Oklahoma, $52,000,000. Fort Story, Virginia, $1,950,000.

., y

MILITARY DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

Fort Myer, Virginia, $8,300,000. UNITED STATES ARMY MATERIEL COMMAND

Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, $4,670,000. Anniston Army Depot, Alabama, $8,960,000. Army Materiel and Mechanics Research Center, Massachusetts, $770,000. Corpus Christi Army Depot, Texas, $4,400,000. Detroit Arsenal, Michigan, $320,000. Dugway Proving Ground, Utah, $8,650,000. Fort Wingate, New Mexico, $490,000. McAlester Army Ammunition Plant, Oklahoma, $2,300,000. Navajo Depot Activity, Arizona, $240,000. New Cumberland Army Depot, Pennsylvania, $88,000,000. Picatinny Arsenal, New Jersey, $1,000,000. Pine Bluff Arsenal, Arkansas, $19,000,000. Pueblo Depot Activity, Colorado, $200,000. Red River Army Depot, Texas, $820,000. Redstone Arsenal, Alabama, $25,750,000. Rock Island Arsenal, Illinois, $29,000,000. Sacramento Army IDepot, California, $4,550,000. Savanna Army I)e»x)t, Illinois, $510,000. Seneca Army Depot, New York, $1,410,000. Sierra Army Depot, California, $2,600,000. Tooele Army Depot, Utah, $11,490,000. UmatUla Depot Activity, Oregon, $260,000. Yuma Proving Ground, Arizona, $240,000. AMMUNITION FACILITIES

Holston Army Ammunition Plant, Tennessee, $320,000. Indiana Army Ammunition Plant, Indiana, $210,000. Iowa Army Ammunition Plant, Iowa, $810,000. Kansas Army Ammunition Plant, Kansas, $570,000. Lake City Army Ammunition Plant, Missouri, $930,000.

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 99 Part 1.djvu/985

 PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985

99 STAT. 963

Louisiana Army Ammunition Plant, Louisiana, $640,000. Newport Army Ammunition Plant, Indiana, $8,000,000. Radford Army Ammunition Plant, Virginia, $2,910,000. UNITED STATES ARMY INFORMATION SYSTEMS COMMAND

Fort Huachuca, Arizona, $2,050,000. UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY

United States Military Academy, New York, $31,000,000. UNITED STATES ARMY HEALTH SERVICES COMMAND

Fort Detrick, Maryland, $7,600,000. Tripler Army Medical Center, Hawaii, $970,000. Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia, $1,150,000. MILTTARY TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT COMMAND

Bayonne Military Ocean Terminal, New Jersey, $3,200,000. Oakland Army Base, California, $330,000. Sunny Point Military Ocean Terminal, North Carolina, $1,200,000. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS

Humphreys $11,000,000.

Engineer

Center,

Supt.

Activity,

Virginia,

ASSISTANT CHIEF OF ENGINEERS

Various, United States, $3,000,000. (2) Funds appropriated for construction of an Army aviation museum at Fort Rucker, Alabama, that is authorized in paragraph (1) may not be obligated for that purpose unless the Secretary of the Army determines that an amount equal to the amount appropriated for that purpose has been made available for such purpose from private sources. (b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—The Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and may carry out military construction projects in the amounts shown for each of the following installations and locations outside the United States: UNITED STATES ARMY, JAPAN

Japan, $1,050,000. EIGHTH UNITED STATES ARMY

Camp Carroll, Korea, $25,380,000. Camp Casey, Korea, $12,920,000. Camp Castle, Korea, $1,100,000. Camp Colbern, Korea, $550,000. Camp Edwards, Korea, $1,090,000. Camp Gary Owen, Korea, $580,000. Camp Giant, Korea, $1,050,000. Camp Greaves, Korea, $420,000. Camp Hovey, Korea, $8,300,000. Camp Howze, Korea, $1,980,000.

Prohibition.

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 99 Part 1.djvu/986

 99 STAT. 964

PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985 Camp Humphreys, Korea, $11,600,000. Camp Kittyhawk, Korea, $1,600,000. Camp Kyle, Korea, $3,580,000. Camp Liberty Bell, Korea, $800,000. Camp Market, Korea, $710,000. Camp Page, Korea, $32,650,000. Camp Pelham, Korea, $2,400,000. Camp Red Ooud, Korea, $1,730,000. Camp Stanley, Korea, $5,500,000. K-16 Army Airfield, Korea, $2,350,000. Location 177, Korea, $2,290,000. Yongin, Korea, $2,550,000. Yongson, Korea, $9,800,000.

.,

i

BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEBIS COliMAND

Kwajalein, $14,600,000. UNITED STATES ARMY FOBCES OOBOlfAND OVERSEAS

Panama, $5,480,000. UNITED STATES ARMY, EUROPE AND SEVENTH ARMY

Amberg, Germany, $850,000. Ansbach, Germany, $14,390,000. ^^ Bad Kreuznach, CJermany, $1,100,000. Bad Toelz, Germany, $1,850,000. Bamberg, Germany, $6,490,000. Baumholder, Germany, $900,000. Darmstadt, Germany, $29,200,000. Frankfurt, Germany, $18,680,000. Friedberg, Germany, $9,150,000. Fulda, Germany, $7,200,000. Giessen, Germany, $1,700,000. Goeppingen, Germany, $10,250,000. Grafenwoehr, Germany, $2,450,000. Haingruen, dermany, $680,000. Hanau, Germany, $48,140,000. Heidelberg, Germany, $8,800,000. Heilbronn, Germany, $2,950,000. Hohenfels, Germany, $6,300,000. Kaiserslautem, Germany, $3,450,000. Karlsruhe, Germany, $4,020,000. Neu Uhn, Germany, $1,000,000. Nuremberg, Germany, $8,500,000. Pirmasens, Germany, $14,000,000. Schoeningen, Germany, $700,000. Schweinfurt, Germany, $17,840,000. Stuttgart, Germany, $4,500,000. Vilseck, Germany, $10,290,000. Wiesbaden, Germany, $2,900,000. WUdflecken, Germany, $20,000,000. Wuerzburg, Germany, $48,070,000. Various Locations, Germany, $101,000,000. Various Locations, Greece, $1,440,000. Various Locations, Italy, $1,850,000. Various Locations, Turkey, $7,440,000.
 * ,.j:

�


text:
Author:Charles King

Works

 * From the Ranks
 * The Deserter
 * The Colonel's Daughter
 * Marion's Faith
 * Kitty's Conquest
 * Ray's Daughter

title: Author:Charles King


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 99 Part 1.djvu/987

 PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985

99 STAT. 965

SEC. 102. FAMILY HOUSING

The Secretary of the Army may construct or acquire family housing units (including land acquisition) at the following installations in the number of units shown, and in the amount shown, for each installation: Fort Ord, California, six hundred units and seventy manufactured home spaces, $50,640,000. Fort Carson, Colorado, fifty manufactured home spaces, $712,000. Fort Stewart, Georgia, twenty manufactured home spaces, $253,000. Bamberg, Germany, one hundred and six units, $7,209,000. Various locations, Germany, ninety-eight units, $6,120,000. Vilsek, Germany, three hundred and seventy units, $26,830,000. Fort Riley, Kansas, fifty manufactured home spaces, $700,000. Fort Campbell, Kentucky, fifty manufactured home spaces, $689,000. Fort Devens, Massachusetts, twenty manufactured home spaces, $317,000. Fort Drum, New York, eight hundred units, $67,500,000. Fort Bragg, North Carolina, two units by reconfiguration and fifty manufactured home spaces, $637,000. Dugway Proving Ground, Utah, one hundred and four units and twenty-four manufactured home spaces, $8,674,000. Fort Myer, Virginia, six units, $596,000. SEC. 103. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING UNITS

(a) AMOUNT AUTHORIZED.—(1) Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of the Army may make expenditures to improve existing military family housing units in an amount not to exceed $167,521,000, of which $10,950,000 is available only for energy conservation projects. (2) Of the funds appropriated pursuant to authorizations made in subsection (a) and in section 601(a) for support of military family housing, the Secretary of the Army shall use $1,521,000 for housing improvements at Watervliet Arsenal, New York. Ob) WAIVER OF MAXIMUM PER UNIT COST FOR CERTAIN IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS.—Notwithstanding the maximum amount per unit

for an improvement project under section 28250t>) of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of the Army may carry out projects to improve existing military family housing units at the following installations in the number of units shown, and in the amount shown, for each installation: Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia, one unit, $99,000. Fort Bragg, North Carolina, one hundred and sixty-four units, $4,712,000. Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, eighty-one units, $2,762,000. Fort Monmouth, New Jersey, three hundred and sixty-six units, $14,800,000. (c) FAMILY HOUSING IMPROVEMENTS AT FORT MONMOUTH, N E W

JERSEY.—The housing units specified in subsection (b) for Fort Monmouth, New Jersey, includes 135 units authorized in section 101 of this Act and 231 units authorized in section 101 of the Military

Energy.

Post, p. 979.

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 99 Part 1.djvu/988

 99 STAT. 966

PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985 Construction Authorization Act, 1985 (Public Law 98-407; 98 Stat.

98 Stat. 1495.

1498). SEC. 104. MADIGAN ARMY MEDICAL CENTER, FORT LEWIS, WASHINGTON

Section 601(c) of the Military Construction Authorization Act, 1985 (Public Law 98-407; 98 Stat. 1512), is amended by striking out "and the amount specified in subsection (b)" and inserting in lieu thereof ", the amount specified in subsection (b)(1), and $326,800,000 (the amount authorized for the construction of the Madigan Army Medical Center, Fort Lewis, Washington)". TITLE II—NAVY Real property.

SEC. 201. AUTHORIZED NAVY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS

(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—The Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and may carry out military construction projects in the amounts shown for each of the following installations and locations inside the United States: UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS

Marine Corps Logistics Base, Barstow, California, $530,000. Marine Corps Air Station, Beaufort, South Carolina, $6,905,000. Marine Corps Mountain Warfare Training Center, Bridgeport, California, $1,470,000. Marine Corps Camp Detachment, Camp Elmore, Norfolk, Virginia, $3,995,000. Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, $24,140,000. Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton, California, $25,175,000. Marine Corps Air Facility, Camp Pendleton, California, $14,310,000. Marine Corps Air Station, Cherry Point, North Carolina, $36,450,000. Marine Corps Air Station, El Toro, California, $30,375,000. Marine Corps Air Station, Kaneohe Bay, Hawaii, $17,420,000. Marine Corps Air Station, New River, North Carolina, $10,780,000. Marine Corps Recruit Depot, Parris Island, South Carolina, $3,610,000. Marine Corps Air Station, Tustin, California, $17,970,000. Marine Corps Air-Ground Combat Center, Twentynine Palms, California, $22,670,000. Marine Corps Development and Education Command, Quantico, Virginia, $7,060,000. Marine Corps Air Station, Yuma, Arizona, $16,750,000. CHIEF OF NAVAL RESEARCH

Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, District of Columbia, $28,900,000. OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER OF THE NAVY

Navy Finance Center, Cleveland, Ohio, $2,940,000. CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS

Naval Academy, Annapolis, Maryland, $18,480,000.

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 99 Part 1.djvu/989

 PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985 Naval Space Command, Dahlgren, Virginia, $4,700,000. Navy Regional Data Automation Center, Jacksonville, Florida, $10,300,000. Naval Space Surveillance Field Station, Lewisville, Arkansas, $675,000. Navy Tactical Interoperability Support Activity, Mayport, Florida, $470,000. Navy Tactical Interoperability Support Activity, North Island, California, $585,000. Navy Regional Data Automation Center, Norfolk, Virginia, $10,880,000. Intelligence Center, Pacific, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, $2,900,000. Naval Space Surveillance Field Station, San Diego, California, $600,000. Commandant Naval District, Washington, District of Columbia, $6,300,000. COMMANDER IN CHIEF, ATLANTIC FLEET

Naval Naval Naval Naval Naval Naval Naval Naval Naval Naval Naval

Air Station, Brunswick, Maine, $3,040,000. Air Station, Cecil Field, Florida, $29,835,000. Station, Charleston, South Carolina, $9,960,000. Air Station, Jacksonville, Florida, $5,800,000. Amphibious Base, Little Creek, Virginia, $16,370,000. Station, Mayport, Florida, $10,820,000. Submarine Base, New London, Connecticut, $365,000. Station, New York, New York, $33,160,000. Air Station, Norfolk, Virginia, $10,675,000. Station, Norfolk, Virginia, $800,000. Air Station, Oceana, Virginia, $16,940,000. COMMANDER IN CHIEF, PACIFIC FLEET

Naval Facility, Adak, Alaska, $2,650,000. Naval Air Station, Alameda, California, $8,650,000. Naval Submarine Base, Bangor, Washington, $5,200,000. Amphibious Task Force, Camp Pendleton, California, $9,020,000. Naval Amphibious Base, Coronado, California, $16,150,000. Naval Station, Everett, Washington, $17,640,000. Naval Air Station, Fallon, Nevada, $36,500,000. Naval Air Station, Lemoore, California, $2,300,000. Naval Station, Long Beach, California, $16,000,000. Naval Air Station, Miramar, California, $385,000. Naval Air Station, North Island, California, $18,593,000. Commander, Oceanographic System, Pacific, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, $1,180,000. Naval Submarine Base, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, $2,900,000. Naval Station, San Diego, California, $16,197,000. Naval Submarine Base, San Diego, California, $14,120,000. Naval Station Mare Island, Vallejo, California, $735,000. Naval Air Station, Whidbey Island, Washington, $2,650,000. CHIEF OF NAVAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING

Fleet and Mine Warfare Training Center, Charleston, South Carolina, $1,180,000. Naval Amphibious School, Coronado, California, $9,330,000.

99 STAT. 967

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 99 Part 1.djvu/990

 99 STAT. 968

PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985 Surface Warfare Officers School Command Detachment, Coronado, California, $5,200,000. Naval Air Station, Corpus Christi, Texas, $4,360,000. Fleet Combat Training Center, Atlantic, Dam Neck, Virginia, $9,640,000. Naval Explosive Ordnance Disposal School, Eglin, Florida, $13,700,000. Naval Traming Center, Great Lakes, Illinois, $20,740,000. Naval Construction Training Center, Gulfport, Mississippi, $2,460,000. Naval Amphibious School, Little Creek, Virginia, $420,000. Naval Air Station, Memphis, Tennessee, $11,695,000. Naval Air Station, Meridian, Mississippi, $450,000. Naval Submarine School, New London, Connecticut, $13,300,000. Naval Education and Training Center, Newport, Rhode Island, $19,580,000. Naval Training Center, Orlando, Florida, $9,400,000. Naval Air Station, Pensacola, Florida, $225,000. Naval Technical Training Center, Pensacola, Florida, $5,670,000. Naval Construction Training Center, Port Hueneme, California, $4,800,000. Fleet Anti-Submarine Warfare Training Center, Pacific, San Diego, California, $7,850,000. Fleet Combat Training Center, Pacific, San Diego, California, $305,000. Fleet Training Center, San Diego, California, $4,750,000. Naval Training Center, San Diego, California, $2,900,000. Naval Technical Training Center, San Francisco, California, $1,570,000. Naval Air Station, Whiting Field, Florida, $810,000. NAVAL MILITARY PERSONNEL COMMAND

Navy Band, Washington, District of Columbia, $1,900,000. NAVAL MEDICAL COMMAND

Naval Naval Naval Naval Naval Naval Naval

Medical Clinic, Annapolis, Maryland, $12,540,000. Hospital, Groton, Connecticut, $8,720,000. Hospital, Jacksonville, Florida, $18,600,000. Hospital, Long Beach, California, $6,300,000. Hospital, Oak Harbor, Washington, $13,900,000. Hospital, Pensacola, Florida, $7,250,000. Hospital, San Diego, California, $450,000. CHIEF OF NAVAL MATERIEL

Naval Air Rework Facility, Alameda, California, $22,780,000. Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, Bremerton, Wsishington, $30,945,000. Naval Supply Center, Bremerton, Washington, $1,520,000. Naval Weapons Station, Charleston, South Carolina, $4,070,000. Polaris Missile Facility, Atlantic, Charleston, South Carolina, $1,620,000. Naval Air Rework Facility, Cherry Point, North Carolina, $1,720,000. Naval Weapons Center, China Lake, California, $9,315,000. Naval Weapons Station, Earle, New Jersey, $3,720,000.

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 99 Part 1.djvu/991

 PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985 Naval Construction Battalion Center, Gulfport, Mississippi, $2,550,000. Naval Ordance Station, Indian Head, Maryland, $1,570,000. Naval Supply Center, Jacksonville, Florida, $1,555,000. Naval Undersea Warfare Engineering Station, Keyport, Washington, $2,440,000. Naval Submarine Base, Kings Bay, Georgia, $388,360,000. Naval Air Engineering Center, Lakehurst, New Jersey, $600,000. Long Beach Naval Shipyard, Long Beach, California, $7,160,000. Naval Ordnance Station, Louisville, Kentucky, $16,950,000. Naval Air Rework Facility, Norfolk, Virgmia, $13,080,000. Naval Supply Center, Norfolk, Virginia, $2,350,000. Naval Air Rework Facility, North Island, California, $9,465,000. Naval Supply Center, Oakland, California, $7,890,000. Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, $1,860,000. Navy Public Works Center, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, $13,700,000. Navy Public Works Center, Pensacola, Florida, $8,430,000. Pacific Missile Test Center, Point Mugu, California, $10,200,000. Naval Construction Battalion Center, Port Hueneme, California, $23,650,000. Naval Ship Weapon Systems Engineering Station, Port Hueneme, California, $10,780,000. Naval Electronic Systems Engineering Center, Portsmouth, Virginia, $3,255,000. Norfolk Naval Shipyard, Portsmouth, Virginia, $6,690,000. Naval Supply Center, San Diego, California, $7,100,000. Naval Electronic Systems Engineering Activity, Saint Inigoes, Maryland, $15,550,000. Mare Island Naval Shipyard, Vallejo, California, $815,000. Naval Air Development Center, Warminster, Pennsylvania, $4,220,000. Naval Mine Warfare Engineering Activity, Yorktown, Virginia, $4,120,000. NAVAL OCEANOGRAPHY CX)MMAND

Naval Oceanography Command Facility, Jacksonville, Florida, $390,000. Naval Western Oceanography Center, Peeirl Harbor, Hawaii, $4,500,000. NAVAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMAND

Naval Radio Station, Sugar Grove, West Virginia, $785,000. NAVAL SECURITY GROUP COMMAND

Naval Security Group Activity, Adak, Alaska, $980,000. Naval Security Group Activity, Northwest, Chesapeake, Virginia, $1,385,000. Naval Security Group Activity, Skaggs Island, California, $395,000. Naval Security Group Activity, Winter Harbor, Maine, $3,280,000. (b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—The Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and may carry out military construction projects in the amounts shown for each of the following installations and locations outside the United States:

99 STAT. 969

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 99 Part 1.djvu/992

 99 STAT. 970

PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985 MARINE CORPS

Marine Corps Air Station, Iwakuni, Japan, $1,775,000. Marine Corps Air Station, Futenma, Okinawa, Japan, $2,990,000. Marine Corps Base Camp Smedley D. Butler, Okinawa, Japan, $2,250,000. COMMANDER IN CHIEF, ATLANTIC FLEET

Naval Facility, Antigua, West Indies, $2,410,000. Naval Facility, Argentia, Newfoundland, Canada, $700,000. Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, $22,410,000. Naval Station, Keflavik, Iceland, $21,780,000. Atlantic Fleet Weapons Training Facility, Roosevelt Roads, Puerto Rico, $7,100,000. Naval Station, Roosevelt Roads, Puerto Rico, $14,700,000. COMMANDER IN CHIEF, PACIFIC FLEET

Navy Support Facility, Diego Garcia, Indian Ocean, $16,530,000. Naval Air Facility, Diego Garcia, Indian Ocean, $22,450,000. Naval Magazine, Guam, $11,270,000. Naval Supply Depot, Guam, $6,550,000. Naval Station, Guam, $10,200,000. Naval Ship Repair Facility, Guam, $990,000. Naval Magazine, Subic Bay, Republic of the Philippines, $250,000. Naval Ship Repair Facility, Subic Bay, Republic of the Philippines, $13,270,000. COMMANDER IN CHIEF, UNITED STATES NAVAL FORCES EUROPE

Naval Activities, London, United Kingdom, $7,635,000. Naval Support Activity, Naples, Italy, $7,750,000. Naval Air Station, Sigonella, Italy, $5,930,000. Personnel Support Activity, London, United Kingdom, $450,000. CHIEF OF NAVAL MATERIEL

Navy Public Works Center, Guam, $1,080,000. Navy Public Works Center, Yokosuka, Japan, $4,400,000. NAVAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMAND

Naval Communication Area Master Station, Western Pacific, Guam, $8,945,000. Naval Communication Station, Harold E. Holt, Exmouth, Australia, $2,690,000. NAVAL SECURITY GROUP COMMAND

Naval Security Group Detachment, Diego Garcia, Indian Ocean, $3,700,000. HOST NATION INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT

Various Locations, $980,000. SEC. 202. FAMILY HOUSING

(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Navy may construct or acquire family housing units (including land acquisition) at the

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 99 Part 1.djvu/993

 PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985

99 STAT. 971

following installations in the number of units shown, and in the amount shown, for each installation: Naval Air Station, Adak, Alaska, one hundred units, $15,500,000. Marine Corps Air Station, El Toro, California, two hundred and eighty-two units, $29,800,000. Marine Corps Air-Ground Combat Center, Twentynine Palms, California, one hundred units, $8,400,000. Navy Public Works Center, San Diego, California, two hundred units, $15,200,000. Fleet Training Group Pacific, Warner Springs, California, forty-four units, $4,400,000. Naval Weapons Station, Earle, New Jersey, two hundred units, $15,400,000. Aviation Supply Office, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, one unit, $170,000. Navy Public Works Center, Subic Bay, Republic of the Philippines, three hundred units, $24,180,000. (b) NAVAL PUBLIC WORKS CENTER, SAN DIEGO.—The Secretary of

the Navy may construct the two hundred housing units authorized by subsection (a) for the Navy Public Works Center, San Diego, California, at Telegraph Point or at any other suitable and available site. SEC. 203. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING UNITS

(a) AMOUNT AUTHORIZED.—Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of the Navy may make expenditures to improve existing military family housing units in an amount not to exceed $34,020,000. (b) WAIVER OF MAXIMUM PER UNIT COST FOR CERTAIN IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS.—Notwithstanding the maximum amount per unit

for an improvement project under section 2825(b) of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of the Navy may carry out projects to improve existing military family housing units at the following installations in the number of units shown, and in the amount shown, for each installation: Navy Public Works Center, San Diego, California, three hundred and seventy-two units, $17,610,000. Naval Air Station, Whidbey Island, Washington, one unit, $56,500. SEC. 204. TRANSIENT HOUSING UNITS, CHINHAE, KOREA

The Secretary of the Navy may convert the four existing transient housing units contained in Building 706 in Chinhae, Korea, to family housing units. SEC. 205. RESTRICTION ON FUNDING FOR NAVY STRATEGIC HOMEPORTING

Funds appropriated pursuant to an authorization in section 602 for Naval Strategic Homeporting may not be obligated or expended for such purpose until— (1) the Secretary of the Navy has submitted to the Congress a report justifying the expenditure of the funds for such purpose; and (2) a period of 90 days has elapsed after the day on which the report is received by the Congress.

Post, p. 980. Report.

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 99 Part 1.djvu/994

 99 STAT. 972

PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985 «

Real property.

-f

TITLE m—AIR FORCE

SEC. 301. AUTHORIZED AIR FORCE CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS

(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—The Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and may carry out military construction projects in the amounts shown for each of the following installations and locations inside the United States: AIR FORCE LOGISTICS COMMAND

Hill Air Force Base, Utah, $28,280,000. Kelly Air Force Base, Texas, $39,749,000. McClellan Air Force Base, California, $53,829,000. Robins Air Force Base, Georgia, $7,350,000. Tinker Air Force Base, Oklahoma, $31,500,000. Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, $21,890,000. AIR FORCE SYSTEMS COMMAND

Brooks Air Force Base, Texas, $2,500,000. Edwards Air Force Base, California, $7,250,000. Eglin Air Force Base, Florida, $14,560,000. Hanscom Air Force Base, Massachusetts, $24,700,000. Sunnyvale Air Force Station, California, $2,700,000. AIR FORCE RESERVE

Billy Mitchell Field, Wisconsin, $500,000. ,,

AIR NATIONAL GUARD

Buckley Air National Guard Base, Colorado, $12,370,000. AIR TRAINING COMMAND

Chanute Air Force Base, Illinois, $1,730,000. Goodfellow Air Force Base, Texas, $27,500,000. Keesler Air Force Base, Mississippi, $10,500,000. Lackland Air Force Base, Texas, $22,750,000. Laughlin Air Force Base, Texas, $1,900,000. Lowry Air Force Base, Colorado, $6,850,000. Mather Air Force Base, California, $2,700,000. Randolph Air Force Base, Texas, $3,200,000. Reese Air Force Base, Texas, $3,250,000. Sheppard Air Force Base, Texas, $16,150,000. Vance Air Force Base, Oklahoma, $4,210,000. Williams Air Force Base, Arizona, $660,000. AIR UNIVERSITY

'"

Gunter Air Force Station, Alabama, $6,000,000. Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama, $12,000,000. ^*«

ALASKAN AIR COMMAND

Attu Research Site, Alaska, $910,000. Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska, $44,950,000. ^o A. Elmendorf Air Force Base, Alaska, $5,000,000.

t rie

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 99 Part 1.djvu/995

 PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985 King Salmon Airport, Alaska, $8,600,000. Shemya Air Force Base, Alaska, $45,900,000. MILITARY AIRUFT COMMAND

Altus Air Force Base, Oklahoma, $11,450,000. Andrews Air Force Base, Maryland, $10,120,000. Base 24, Classified Location, $6,170,000. Boiling Air Force Base, District of Columbia, $250,000. Charleston Air Force Base, South Carolina, $1,620,000. Dover Air Force Base, Delaware, $16,890,000. Eglin Auxiliary Field 9, Florida, $1,700,000. Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico, $60,330,000. McChord Air Force Base, Washington, $2,240,000. McGuire Air Force Base, New Jersey, $14,550,000. Norton Air Force Base, California, $4,570,000. Pope Air Force Base, North Carolina, $440,000. Scott Air Force Base, Illinois, $17,150,000. Travis Air Force Base, California, $10,300,000. PACIFIC AIR FORCES

Hickam Air Force Base, Hawaii, $480,000. Wheeler Air Force Base, Hawaii, $2,850,000. SPACE COMMAND

Cape Cod Air Force Station, Massachusetts, $600,000. Cavalier Air Force Station, North Dakota, $950,000. Clear Air Force Station, Alaska, $4,500,000. Peterson Air Force Base, Colorado, $5,200,000. SPECIAL PROJECT

Various Locations, $55,000,000. STRATEGIC AIR COMMAND

Barksdale Air Force Base, Louisiana, $1,400,000. Base 34, Classified Location, $8,920,000. Beale Air Force Base, California, $5,850,000. Belle Fourche Air Force Station, South Dakota, $4,080,000. Blytheville Air Force Base, Arkansas, $3,750,000. Carswell Air Force Base, Texas, $1,000,000. Castle Air Force Base, California, $3,300,000. Dyess Air Force Base, Texas, $16,950,000. Ellsworth Air Force Base, South Dakota, $72,064,000. Fairchild Air Force Base, Washington, $12,500,000. F.E. Warren Air Force Base, Wyoming, $15,310,000. Grand Forks Air Force Base, North Dakota, $62,730,000. Griffiss Air Force Base, New York, $2,740,000. Grissom Air Force Base, Indiana, $1,700,000. K.I. Sawyer Air Force Base, Michigan, $22,580,000. Malmstrom Air Force Bgise, Montana, $1,300,000. March Air Force Base, California, $9,000,000. McConnell Air Force Base, Kansas, $66,490,000. Minot Air Force Base, North Dakota, $5,000,000. Offutt Air Force Base, Nebraska, $10,440,000. Pease Air Force Base, New Hampshire, $1,200,000.

99 STAT. 973

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 99 Part 1.djvu/996

 99 STAT. 974

PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985 Plattsburgh Air Force Base, New York, $1,050,000. Vandenberg Air Force Base, California, $1,960,000. Whiteman Air Force Base, Missouri, $4,650,000. Wurtsmith Air Force Base, Michigan, $5,300,000. TACTICAL AIR COMMAND

Bergstrom Air Force Base, Texas, $770,000. Cannon Air Force Base, New Mexico, $12,500,000. Davis-Monthan Air Force Base, Arizona, $5,730,000. England Air Force Base, Louisiana, $2,600,000. George Air Force Base, California, $5,240,000. Holloman Air Force Base, New Mexico, $16,850,000. Homestead Air Force Base, Florida, $7,015,000. Langley Air Force Base, Virginia, $8,680,000. Luke Air Force Base, Arizona, $14,780,000. MacDill Air Force Base, Florida, $8,850,000. Moody Air Force Base, Geoi^a, $24,030,000. Mountain Home Air Force Base, Idaho, $14,600,000. Myrtle Beach Air Force Base, South Carolina, $430,000. Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada, $17,860,000. Seymour-Johnson Air Force Base, North Carolina, $2,320,000. Shaw Air Force Base, South Carolina, $13,300,000. Tyndall Air Force Base, Florida, $8,780,000, UNITED STATES AIR FORCE ACADEMY

Air Force Academy, Colorado, $10,310,000. (b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—The Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and may carry out military construction projects in the amounts shown for each of the following installations and locations outside the United States: MILITARY AIRUFT COMMAND

<+£• -

Lajes Field, Portugal, $25,285,000. Rhein-Main Air Base, Germany, $1,500,000. PACIFIC AIR FORCES

Camp Zama, Japan, $1,500,000. Kadena Air Base, Japan, $27,650,000. Misawa Air Base, Japan, $9,500,000. Yokota Air Base, Japan, $10,400,000. Kimhae Air Base, Korea, $10,400,000. Kunsan Air Base, Korea, $9,000,000. KwangnJu Air Base, Korea, $16,310,000. Osan Air Base, Korea, $24,510,000. Sachon Air Base, Korea, $310,000. Diego Garcia Air Base, Indian Ocean, $5,300,000. Clark Air Base, Republic of the Philippines, $15,050,000. SPACE COMMAND

Thule Air Base, Greenland, $12,350,000. Sondrestrom Air Base, Greenland, $5,750,000. GEODSS Site 5, Portugal, $14,650,000. Pirinclik Air Station, Turkey, $2,600,000. BMEWS Site IB, Fylingdales, United Kingdom, $3,100,000.

h";

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 99 Part 1.djvu/997

 PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985 TACTICAL AIR COMMAND

Howard Air Force Base, Panama, $2,172,000. UNITED STATES AIR FORCES IN EUROPE

Florennes Air Base, Belgium, $5,860,000. Ahlhorn Air Base, Germany, $350,000. Bitburg Air Base, Germany, $9,050,000. Einsiedlerhof, Germany, $2,900,000. Hahn Air Base, Germany, $8,160,000. Hessisch Oldendorf Air Station, Germany, $1,230,000. Kapaun Air Station, Germany, $900,000. Leipheim Air Base, Germany, $350,000. Marienfelde Communications Station, Germany, $2,550,000. Norvenich Air Base, Germany, $350,000. Pruem Air Station, Germany, $1,250,000. Ramstein Air Base, Germany, $14,670,000. Sembach Air Base, Germany, $6,460,000. Spangdahlem Air Base, Germany, $14,860,000. Various Locations, Germany, $940,000. Vogelweh Air Station, Germany, $1,250,000. Wenigerath Storage Site, Germany, $1,700,000. Zweibrucken Air Base, Germany, $4,550,000. Aviano Air Base, Italy, $5,070,000. Comiso Air Station, Italy, $6,280,000. Decimomannu Air Base, Italy, $2,800,000. San Vito Air Station, Italy, $1,590,000. Morocco, $3,100,000. Camp New Amsterdam, The Netherlands, $2,710,000. Keizerveer Air Base, The Netherlands, $270,000. Woensdrecht Air Base, The Netherlands, $15,980,000. Vught, The Netherlands, $310,000. Torrejon Air Base, Spain, $2,900,000. Ankara Air Station, Turkey, $950,000. Incirlik Air Base, Turkey, $11,570,000. Karatas, Turkey, $2,330,000. RAF Alconbury, United Kingdom, $20,910,000. RAF Bentwaters, United Kingdom, $12,050,000. RAF Chicksands, United Kingdom, $1,630,000. RAF Fairford, United Kingdom, $7,400,000. RAF Greenham Common, United Kingdom, $2,200,000. RAF Lakenheath, United Kingdom, $10,320,000. RAF Mildenhall, United Kingdom, $4,080,000. RAF Molesworth, United Kingdom, $21,063,000. RAF Sculthorpe, United Kingdom, $2,350,000. RAF Upper Heyford, United Kingdom, $4,640,000. Various Locations, United Kingdom, $3,600,000. Base 25, Classified Location, $4,500,000. Base 29, Classified Location, $3,500,000. Base 30, Classified Location, $4,830,000. Base 33, Classified Location, $9,450,000. Various Locations, Europe, $4,450,000. SEC. 302. FAMILY HOUSING

The Secretary of the Air Force may construct or acquire family housing units (including land acquisition) at the following installa-

99 STAT. 975

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 99 Part 1.djvu/998

 99 STAT. 976

Energy.

PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985 tions in the number of units shown, and in the amount shown, for each installation: Florennes, Belgium, four hundred units, $29,200,000. Hahn Air Base, Germany, four hundred and forty units, $33,000,000. Ramstein Air Base, Germany, four hundred units, $30,000,000. Osan Air Base, Korea, family housing support facilities, $1,200,000. Camp New Amsterdam, The Netherlands, one hundred and forty units, $11,000,000. Clark Air Base, Republic of the Philippines, four hundred and fifty units, $37,900,000. Belle Fourche Air Force Station, South Dakota, fifty units, $4,000,000. SEC. 303. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING UNITS (a) AMOUNT AUTHORIZED.—Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of the Air Force may make expenditures to improve existing military family housing units in an amount not to exceed $61,300,000, of which $19,939,000 is available only for energy conservation projects. (b) WAIVER OF MAXIMUM PER U N I T COST FOR CERTAIN IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS.—Notwithstanding the maximum amount per unit

for an improvement project under section 2825(b) of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of the Air Force may carry out projects to improve existing military family housing units at the following installations in the number of units shown, and in the amount shown, for each installation: Boiling Air Force Base, District of Columbia, twenty-four units, $1,200,000. Scott Air Force Base, Illinois, eighty units, $4,006,000. Offutt Air Force Base, Nebraska, thirty-two units, $2,873,000. Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico, one hundred and ten units, $3,724,000. Ramstein Air Base, Germany, two hundred and eighty units, $10,279,000. Andersen Air Force Base, Guam, one hundred units, $6,605,000. Kadena Air Base, Japan, two hundred and thirty-five units, $12,163,000. Clark Air Base, Philippines, twenty-nine units, $1,042,000. (c) IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AT PETERSON AIR FORCE BASE, COLO-

RADO.—(1) To support the United States Space Command (USSPACECOM), the Secretary of the Air Force may carry out an improvement project at Peterson Air Force Base, Colorado, to add to and alter an existing facility and (notwithstanding section 2826 of title 10, United States Code) convert such facility to a family housing unit with a maximum net floor area of 3,100 square feet at a cost not to exceed $81,000. (2) The amount authorized for the project by paragraph (1) shall not be considered an increase in the amount authorized to be appropriated by this Act for functions of the Department of the Air Force. (3) For purposes of this subsection, the term "net floor area" has the same meaning given that term by section 2826(f) of title 10, United States Code.

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 99 Part 1.djvu/999

 PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985

99 STAT. 977

SEC. 304. RESTRICTION ON USE OF FUNDS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF FACILITIES IN THE NETHERLANDS

Funds appropriated to the Air Force pursuant to an authorization Prohibition. in section 603 for the construction of facilities in The Netherlands to Post, p. 981. support ground launched cruise missiles (GLCM) may not be obligated or expended until the Government of The Netherlands has officially approved the deplojmient of such missiles in The Netherlands. SEC. 305. SPECIAL IMPACT ASSISTANCE TO CERTAIN SCHOOL DISTRICTS

Of the funds appropriated to the Air Force for fiscal year 1986 for Grants. the acquisition of land to expand Melrose Air Force Range, New Mexico, the Secretary of the Air Force may use not more than $50,000 to provide assistance, by grant or otherwise, to school districts in communities near the Melrose Air Force Range for purposes of mitigating any adverse impact on the schools in such districts determined by the Secretary to result from expansion of the range. TITLE IV—DEFENSE AGENCIES SEC. 401. AUTHORIZED CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS AND LAND ACQUISITION FOR THE DEFENSE AGENCIES (a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—The Secretary of Defense may

acquire real property and carry out military construction projects in the amounts shown for each of the following installations and locations inside the United States: DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY

Defense Property Disposal Office, Anchorage, Alaska, $1,390,000. Defense Property Disposal Office, Alameda, California, $1,320,000. Defense Property Disposal Office, Barstow, California, $825,000. Defense Fuel Support Point, San Diego, California, $600,000, Defense Fuel Support Point, San Pedro, California, $700,000. Defense Property Disposal Office, Groton, Connecticut, $625,000. Defense Fuel Support Point, Port Tampa, Florida, $595,000. Defense Property Disposal Office, Fort Riley, Kansas, $965,000. Defense Fuel Support Point, Newington, New Hampshire, $1,040,000. Defense Fuel Support Point, Verona, New York, $1,395,000. Defense Depot, Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania, $470,000. Defense Depot, Memphis, Tennessee, $8,085,000. Defense Property Disposal Office, Texarkana, Texas, $2,635,000. Defense Depot, Ogden, Utah, $3,825,000. Defense Property Disposal Office, Hill Air Force Base, Ogden, Utah, $750,000. Defense General Supply Center, Richmond, Virginia, $5,355,000. Defense Property Disposal Office, Richmond, Virginia, $650,000. Defense Fuel Support Point, Manchester, Washington, $565,000. Defense Property Disposal Office, F.E. Warren Air Force Base, Cheyenne, Wyoming, $1,020,000. DEFENSE MAPPING AGENCY

Repromat Secure Storage Facility, Mineral Wells, Texas, $900,000.

Real property.

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 99 Part 1.djvu/1000

 99 STAT. 978

PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985 i

NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY

Fort Meade, Maryland, $82,142,000. OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OP DEFENSE

Classified Location, $12,000,000. Fort McNair, Washington, District of Columbia, $25,000,000. Classified Location, $3,142,000. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE SECTION 6 SCHOOLS

Fort Benning, Georgia, $1,693,000. Fort Bragg, North Carolina, $5,660,000. Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, $8,400,000. Myrtle Beach Air Force Base, South Carolina, $1,400,000. Quantico, Virginia, $3,500,000. (b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—The Secretary of Defense may acquire real property and may carry out military construction projects in the amounts shown for each of the following installations and locations outside the United States: D E F E N S E LOGISTICS AGENCY

Defense Property Disposal Office, Kaiserslautern, Germany, $360,000. Defense Fuel Support Point, Chimu Wan, Okinawa, Japan, $8,160,000. Defense Fuel Support Point, Pyongtaek, Korea, $5,820,000. Defense Fuel Support Point, Uijongbu, Korea, $6,200,000. N A T I O N A L SECURITY AGENCY

Classified Locations, $7,150,000. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE SECTION 6 SCHOOLS

Fort Buchanan, Puerto Rico, $9,753,000. Naval Station, Roosevelt Roads, Puerto Rico, $1,200,000. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE OVERSEAS DEPENDENTS SCHOOLS

Florennes, Belgium, $7,420,000. Babenhausen, Germany, $760,000. Bamberg, Germany, $5,800,000. Butzbach, Germany, $3,420,000. Hanau, Germany, $7,480,000. Heidelberg, Germany, $1,910,000. Heilbronn, Germany, $2,520,000. Pirmasens, Germany, $1,630,000. Schweinfurt, Germany, $3,930,000. Sembach Air Base, Germany, $2,170,000. Vilseck, Germany, $6,680,000. Sigonella, Italy, $5,360,000. Misawa Air Base, Japan, $4,780,000. Okinawa, Japan, $300,000. Osan Air Base, Korea, $2,780,000. Pusan, Korea, $1,540,000. Taegu, Korea, $730,000.

..

,;.;..%?<

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 99 Part 1.djvu/1001

 PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985

99 STAT. 979

Soesterberg Air Base, Netherlands, $4,460,000. Clark Air Base, Republic of the Philippines, $7,190,000. Bicester, United Kingdom, $4,570,000. Upwood, United Kingdom, $3,240,000. Woodbridge RAF Station, United Kingdom, $1,060,000. SEC. 402. FAMILY HOUSING

The Secretary of Defense may construct or acquire twenty family housing units (including land acquisition) at classified installations in the total amount of $1,800,000. SEC. 403. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING UNITS

Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of Defense may make expenditures to improve existing military family housing units in an amount not to exceed $110,000. TITLE V—NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION INFRASTRUCTURE SEC. 501. AUTHORITY OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE TO MAKE CONTRIBUTIONS

The Secretary of Defense may make contributions for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization infrastructure program as provided in section 2806 of title 10, United States Code, in an amount not to exceed the amount authorized to be appropriated in section 605 plus the amount collected from the North Atlantic Treaty Organization as a result of construction previously financed by the United States.

Post, p. 982.

TITLE VI—AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS AND RECURRING ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS SEC. 601. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, ARMY

(a) IN GENERAL.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 1985, for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of the Army in the total amount of $3,312,803,000 as follows: (1) For military construction projects inside the United States authorized by section 101(a), $1,063,432,000. Ante, p. 961. (2) For military construction projects outside the United States authorized by section 101(b), $429,140,000. (3) For military construction projects inside the United States authorized by section 101 of the Military Construction Authorization Act, 1985, $26,000,000. 98 Stat. 1495. (4) For unspecified minor construction projects under section 2805 of title 10, United States Code, $31,000,000. (5) For architectural and engineering services and construction design under section 2807 of title 10, United States Code, $136,100,000. (6) For military family housing functions— (A) for construction and acquisition of military family housing and facilities, $356,337,000; and (B) for support of military family housing (including the functions described in section 2833 of title 10, United States Code), $1,270,794,000, of which not more than $2,520,000 Post, p. 987. may be obligated or expended for the leasing of military family housing units in the United States, the Common-

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 99 Part 1.djvu/1002

 99 STAT. 980

Ante, p. 961.

PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985 wealth of Puerto Rico, and Guam, and not more than $131,047,000 may be obligated or expended for the leasing of military family housing units in foreign countries. (b) AUTHORIZATION OF UNOBLIGATED FUNDS.—Funds appropriated to the Department of Defense for fiscal years before fiscal year 1986 for military construction functions of the Army that remain available for obligation are hereby authorized to be made available, to the extent provided in appropriation Acts, for military construction projects authorized in section 101 in the amount of $291,210,000 (which includes $82,500,000 for the construction of a utility project at Fort Drum, New York, and $56,000,000 for Pershing II security upgrade at various locations, Germany). (c) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS AUTHORIZED IN TITLE I.—Notwithstanding the cost variations

authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 101 may not exceed— (1) the total amount authorized to be appropriated under paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a); (2) the amount specified in subsection (b); (3) $73,000,000 (the balance of the amount authorized for the construction of the Eastern Distribution Center, New Cumberland Army Depot, Pennsylvania); and (4) $45,000,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under section 101(b) for Pershing II security upgrade at various locations, Germany). SEC. 602. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NAVY

Ante, p. 966.

Post, p. 987.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 1985, for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of the Navy in the total amount of $2,408,184,000 as follows: (1) For military construction projects inside the United States authorized by section 201(a), $1,304,480,000. (2) For military construction projects outside the United States authorized by section 201(b), $201,185,000. (3) For unspecified minor construction projects under section 2805 of title 10, United States Code, $21,560,000. (4) For architectural and engineering services and construction design under section 2807 of title 10, United States Code, $139,260,000. (5) For advances to the Secretary of Transportation for construction of defense access roads under section 210 of title 23, United States Code, $2,960,000. (6) For military family housing functions— (A) for construction and acquisition of military family housing and facilities, $154,000,000; and (B) for support of military housing (including functions described in section 2833 of title 10, United States Code), $584,739,000, of which not more than $3,545,000 may be obligated or expended for the leasing of military family housing units in the United States, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and Guam, and not more than $18,934,000 may be obligated or expended for the leasing of military family housing units in foreign countries.

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 99 Part 1.djvu/1003

 PUBLIC LAW 9 9 - 1 6 7 - D E C. 3, 1985

99 STAT. 981

(b) AUTHORIZATION OF UNOBLIGATED FUNDS.—Funds appropriated to the Department of Defense for fiscal years before fiscal year 1986 for military construction functions of the Navy that remain available for obligation are hereby authorized to be made available, to the extent provided in appropriation Acts, for military construction projects authorized in section 201 in the amount of $105,935,000. (c) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IN TITLE IL—Notwithstanding the cost

Ante, p. 966.

PROJECTS

variations authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 201 may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appropriated under paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a) and the amount specified in subsection (b). SEC. 603. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, AIR FORCE

(a) IN GENERAL.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 1985, for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of the Air Force in the total amount of $2,700,991,000 as follows: (1) For military construction projects inside the United States authorized by section 301(a), $1,147,207,000. (2) For military construction projects outside the United States authorized by section 301(b), $415,550,000. (3) For unspecified minor construction projects under section 2805 of title 10, United States Code, $22,000,000. (4) For architectural and engineering services and construction design under section 2807 of title 10, United States Code, $144,096,000. (5) For advances to the Secretary of Transportation for construction of defense access roads under section 210 of title 23, United States Code, $30,240,000. (6) For military family housing functions— (A) for construction and acquisition of military family housing and facilities, $212,600,000; and (B) for support of military housing (including functions described in section 2833 of title 10, United States Code), $729,298,000, of which not more than $2,711,000 may be obligated or expended for the leasing of military family housing units in the United States, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and Guam, and not more than $45,402,000 may be obligated or expended for the leasing of military family housing units in foreign countries. (b) AUTHORIZATION OF UNOBLIGATED FUNDS.—Funds appropriated to the Department of Defense for fiscal years before fiscal year 1986 for military construction functions of the Air Force that remain available for obligation are hereby authorized to be made available, to the extent provided in appropriation Acts, for military construction projects authorized in section 301 in the amount of $100,000,000. (c) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IN TITLE III.—Notwithstanding the cost

PROJECTS

variations authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 301 may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appropriated under paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a) and the amount specified in subsection (b).

Ante, p. 972.

Post, p. 987.

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 99 Part 1.djvu/1004

 99 STAT. 982

PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985 SEC. 604. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, DEFENSE AGENCIES

Ante, p. 977.

Post, p. 987.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 1985, for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of the Defense (other than the military departments), in the total amount of $258,595,000 as follows: (1) For military construction projects inside the United States authorized by section 401(a), $95,149,000. (2) For military construction projects outside the United States authorized by section 401(b), $104,146,000. (3) For unspecified minor construction projects under section 2805 of title 10, United States Code, $4,000,000. (4) For construction projects under the contingency construction authority of the Secretary of Defense under section 2804 of title 10, United States Code, $5,000,000. (5) For architectural and engineering services and construction design under section 2807 of title 10, United States Code, $30,000,000. (6) For military family housing functions— (A) for construction and acquisition of military family housing and facilities, $1,910,000; and (B) for support of military housing (including functions described in section 2833 of title 10, United States Code), $18,390,000, of which not more than $14,933,000 may be obligated or expended for the leasing of military family housing units in foreign countries. (b) AUTHORIZATION OF UNOBLIGATED FUNDS.—Funds appropriated to the Department of Defense for fiscal years before fiscal year 1986 for military construction functions of the Defense Agencies that remain available for obligation are hereby authorized to be made available, to the extent provided in appropriations Acts, for military construction projects authorized in section 401 in the amount of $42,025,000. (c) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS AUTHORIZED IN TITLE IV.—Notwithstanding the cost variations

authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variations authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 401 may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appropriated under paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a), the amount specified in subsection (b), and $53,700,000 (the balance of the amount authorized for the construction of a research and engineering facility at Fort Meade, Maryland). SEC. 605. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NATO

Ante, p. 979.

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 1985, for contributions by the Secretary of Defense under section 2806 of title 10, United States Code, for the share of the United States of the cost of construction projects for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Infrastructure Program, as authorized by section 501, in the amount of $38,000,000. SEC. 606. EXPIRATION OF AUTHORIZATIONS; EXTENSION OF CERTAIN PREVIOUS AUTHORIZATIONS

(a) EXPIRATION OF AUTHORIZATIONS AFTER TWO YEARS.—(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), all authorizations contained in titles I, II, III, IV, and V for military construction projects, land acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, and contributions to the

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 99 Part 1.djvu/1005

 PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985

99 STAT. 983

NATO Infrastructure Program (and authorizations of appropriations therefor contained in sections 601 through 605) shall expire on October 1, 1987, or the date of the enactment of the Military Construction Authorization Act for fiscal year 1988, whichever is later. (2) The provisions of paragraph (1) do not apply to authorizations for military construction projects, land acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, and contributions to the NATO Infrastructure Program (and authorizations of appropriations therefor), for which appropriated funds have been obligated before October 1, 1987, or the date of the enactment of the Military Construction Authorization Act for fiscal year 1988, whichever is later, for construction contracts, land acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, or contributions to the NATO Infrastructure Program. (b) EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR

Ante, pp. 979-982. Contracts.

1984

PROJECTS.—Notwithstanding the provisions of section 607(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act, 1984 (Public Law 98-115; 97 Stat. 780), authorizations for the following projects authorized in sections 101, 201,301, and 401 of that Act shall remain in effect until October 1, 1986, or the date of enactment of the Military Construction Authorization Act for fiscal year 1987, whichever is later: (1) Consolidated heating system in the amount of $1,850,000 at Stuttgart, Germany. (2) Consolidated heating system in the amount of $1,750,000 at Stuttgart, Germany. (3) Range modernization in the amount of $2,450,000 at Wildflecken, Germany. (4) Unaccompanied personnel housing in the amount of $1,400,000 at Argyroupolis, Greece. (5) Operations building in the amount of $370,000 at Argyroupolis, Greece. (6) Multipurpose recreation facility in the amount of $480,000 at Argyroupolis, Greece. (7) Unaccompanied Officer housing in the amount of $600,000 at Perivolaki, Greece. (8) Operations building in the amount of $410,000 at Perivolaki, Greece. (9) Multipurpose recreation facility in the amount of $620,000 at Perivolald, Greece. (10) Physical fitness training center in the amount of $1,000,000 at Elefsis, Greece. (11) Operations control center in the amount of $7,800,000 at the Naval Air Station, Brunswick, Maine. (12) Engine test cell modifications in the amount of $1,180,000 at the Naval Air Station, Cecil Field, Florida. (13) Land acquisition in the amount of $830,000 at the Naval Weapons Station, Concord, California. (14) Unaccompanied enlisted personnel housing in the amount of $10,000,000 at the Naval Air Station, Jacksonville, Florida. (15) Electrical distribution lines in the amount of $7,200,000 at the Naval Shipyard Mare Islguid, Vallejo, California. (16) FamUy housing in the amount of $33,982,000 at RAF Upper Heyford, United Kingdom. (17) Air freight terminal in the amount of $10,200,000 at Elmendorf, Alaska.

97 Stat. 757, '^62, 768, 775.

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 99 Part 1.djvu/1006

 99 STAT. 984

PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985 (18) Sewage system in the amount of $2,760,000 at the Naval Training Center, Orlando, Florida. (19) Physical fitness training center in the amount of $1,000,000 at Fort Hunter Liggett, California. (20) Child care center in the amount of $3,000,000 at Fort Polk, Louisiana. (21) Physical fitness training center in the amount of $2,200,000 at Sierra Army Depot, California. (22) Special Process Laboratories Building in the amount of $39,100,000 at Fort Meade, Maryland. SEC. 607. ESTABLISHMENT OF CERTAIN AMOUNTS REQUIRED TO BE SPECIFIED BY LAW

Contracts.

Post, p. 989.

Real property.

For projects or contracts initiated during the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on the date of the enactment of the Military Construction Authorization Act for fiscal year 1987 or October 1, 1986, whichever is later, the following amounts apply: (1) The maximum amount for an unspecified minor military construction project under section 2805 of title 10, United States Code, is $1,000,000. (2) The amount of a contract for architectural and engineering services or construction design that makes such a contract subject to the reporting requirement under section 2807 of title 10, United States Code, is $300,000. (3) The maximum amount per unit for an improvement project for family housing units under section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, is $30,000. (4) The maximum annual rental for a family housing unit leased in the United States, Puerto Rico, or Guam under section 2828(b) of title 10, United States Code, is $10,000. (5)(A) The maximum annual rental for a family housing unit leased in a foreign country under section 2828(c) of title 10, United States Code, is $16,800. (B) The maximum number of family housing units that may be leased at any one time in foreign countries under section 2828(c) of title 10, United States Code, is 32,000. (6) The maximum rental per year for family housing facilities, or for real property related to family housing facilities, leased in a foreign country under section 2828(f) of title 10, United States Code, is $250,000. TITLE VII—GUARD AND RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES SEC. 701. AUTHORIZATION FOR GUARD AND RESERVE FACILITIES

10 USC 2231.

There are authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 1985, for the costs of acquisition, architectural and engineering services, and construction of facilities for the Guard and Reserve Forces, and for contributions therefor, under chapter 133 of title 10, United States Code (including the cost of acquisition of land for those facilities), the following amounts: (1) For the Department of the Army— (A) for the Army National Guard of the United States, $149,101,000, and (B) for the Army Reserve, $70,700,000. (2) For the Department of the Navy, for the Naval and Marine Corps Reserves, $51,800,000.

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 99 Part 1.djvu/1007

 PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985

99 STAT. 985

(3) For the Department of the Air Force— (A) for the Air National Guard of the United States, $139,000,000, and (B) for the Air Force Reserve, $70,650,000. SEC. 702. ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES RELATED TO CONSTRUCTION OF NATIONAL GUARD ARMORIES (a) CONTRIBUTIONS TO STATES.—Subsection (e) of section 2233 of

title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: "(e) The Secretary of Defense may procure, or contribute to any State such amounts as the Secretary determines to be necessary to procure, architectural and engineering services and construction design in connection with facilities to be established or developed under this chapter which are not otherwise authorized by law.". (b) AMOUNT OF CONTRIBUTION.—Subsection (b) of section 2236 of such title is amended to read as follows: "(b) A contribution made for an armory under clause (4) or (5) of section 2233(a) of this title may not exceed the sum of— "(1) 100 percent of the cost of architectural, engineering and design services (including advance architectural, engineering and design services under section 2233(e) of this title); and "(2) a percentage of the cost of construction (exclusive of the cost of architectural, engineering and design services) calculated so that upon completion of construction the total contribution (including the contribution for architectural, engineering and design services) equals 75 percent of the total cost of construction (including the cost of architectural, engineering and design services). For the purpose of computing the cost of construction under this subsection, the amount contributed by a State, territory, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or the District of Columbia, as the case may be, may not include the cost or market value of any real property that it has contributed.".

10 USC 2236.

Supra.

Real property.

TITLE VIII—GENERAL PROVISIONS PART A—MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM PROVISIONS SEC. 801. BUILD-TO-LEASE AND RENTAL GUARANTEE PILOT PROGRAMS (a) RENTAL GUARANTEE PROGRAM.—(1) Subsection (h) of section

802 of the Military Construction Authorization Act, 1984 (10 U.S.C. 2821 note), is amended by striking out "September 30, 1985" and inserting in lieu thereof "September 30, 1986". (2) Subsection (g) of such section is amended— (A) by inserting "(1)" after "(g)"; and (B) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: "(2) In addition to the contracts authorized by subsection (0 and Contracts. paragraph (1) of this subsection, the Secretary of each military department may enter into one or more agreements under this paragraph for not more than a total of 600 family housing units.". (b) BUILD-TO-LEASE PROGRAM.—(1) Paragraph (9) of section 2828(g)

of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking out "October 1, 1985" and inserting in lieu thereof "September 30, 1986". (2) Paragraph (8) of such section is amended— (A) by inserting "(A)" after "(8)"; and

98 Stat. 1521.

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 99 Part 1.djvu/1008

 99 STAT. 986 Contracts.

98 Stat. 1517, 1518.

Regulations.

98 Stat. 1517, 1518.

Regulations.

PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985 (B) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: "(B) In addition to the contracts authorized by paragraph (7) and subparagraph (A), the Secretary of each military department may enter into one or more contracts under this subparagraph for not more than a total of 600 family housing units.". SEC. 802. FAMILY HOUSING OCCUPANT LIABILITY (a) LiABiuTY FOR FAILURE To CLEAN SATISFACTORILY.—Subsection (a) of section 2775 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by inserting "(1)" after "(a)"; and (2) by adding at the end thereof the following new paragraph: "(2) A member of the armed forces— "(A) who is assigned or provided a family housing unit; and "(B) who fails to clean satisfactorily that housing unit (as determined under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of Transportation with respect to the Coast Guard when it is not operating as a service in the Navy) upon termination of the assignment or provision of that housing unit, shall be liable to the United States for the cost of cleaning made necessary as a result of that failure.". (b) AUTHORITY OF SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION.—Section 2775 of such title is amended— (1) in subsections (a) and (b), by inserting after "the Secretary of Defense" the following: "and the Secretary of Transportation when the Coast Guard is not operating as a service in the Navy"; and (2) in subsection (d), by inserting after "or defense agency concerned" the following: ", or the operating expenses account of the Coast Guard, as appropriate". (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—(1) Subsection (b) of such section is amended by inserting "(in the case of liability under subsection (a)(1))" after "including". (2) Subsection (c)(1) of such section is amended by striking out "subsection (a)" and inserting in lieu thereof "subsection (a)(1), or the cost of any cleaning made necessary by a failure to clean satisfactorily a family housing unit referred to in subsection (a)(2),". (3) Subsection (d) of such section is amended by inserting "or failure to clean satisfactorily a family housing unit" after "(or the equipment or furnishings of a family housing unit)". (4) Subsection (e) of such section is amended to read as follows: "(e) The Secretary of Defense, and the Secretary of Transportation when the Coast Guard is not operating as a service in the Navy, shall prescribe regulations to carry out this section. Such regulations shall include— "(1) regulations for determining the cost of repairs and replacements made necessary as the result of abuse or negligence for which a member is liable under subsection (a)(1); "(2) regulations for determining the cost of cleaning made necessary as a result of the failure to clean satisfactorily for which a member is liable under subsection (a)(2); and "(3) provisions for limitations of liability, the compromise or waiver of claims, and the collection of amounts owed under this section.". (d) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.—(1) The heading of such section is amended to read as follows:

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 99 Part 1.djvu/1009

 PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985

99 STAT. 987

"§ 2775. Liability of members assigned to military housing". (2) The item relating to such section in the table of sections at the beginning of chapter 165 of such title is amended to read as follows: "2775. Liability of members assigned to military housing.". SEC. 803. PREOCCUPANCY TERMINATION COSTS

Section 2828(d) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by inserting "(D" after "(d)"; and (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: "(2) The Secretary may enter into an agreement under this paragraph in connection with a lease entered into under subsection (c). Such an agreement— "(A) shall be for the purpose of compensating a developer for any costs resulting from the termination of the lease during the construction of the housing units that are to be occupied pursuant to the lease; "(B) may be for a period not in excess of three years; and "(C) shall include a provision that the obligation of the United States to make payments under the agreement in any fiscal year is subject to the availability of appropriations.".

Contracts.

SEC. 804. ACTIVITIES INCLUDED WITHIN AUTHORIZATIONS FOR MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING (a) CONSTRUCTION AND ACQUISITION OF FAMILY HOUSING.—Section

2821 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end thereof the following new subsection: "(d) Amounts authorized by law for construction and acquisition of military family housing and facilities include amounts for— "(1) minor construction; "(2) improvements to existing military family housing units and facilities; "(3) relocation of military family housing units under section 2827 of this title; and "(4) architectural and engineering services and construction design.". (b) FAMILY HOUSING SUPPORT.—(1) Chapter 169 of such title is amended by adding at the end of subchapter II the following new section: "§ 2833. Family housing support "Amounts authorized by law for support of military family housing include amounts for— "(1) operating expenses; "(2) leasing expenses; "(3) maintenance of real property expenses; "(4) payments of principal and interest on mortgage debts incurred; and "(5) payments of mortgage insurance premiums authorized under section 222 of the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1715m).". (2) The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter II of such chapter is amended by adding after the item relating to section 2832 the following new item: "2833. Family housing support.".

lo use 2827.

10 USC 2833. Real property.

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 99 Part 1.djvu/1010

 99 STAT. 988

PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985 SEC. 805. DOMESTIC FAMILY HOUSING LIMITATIONS

Contracts.

Section 2828(b)(3) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by striking out "(3) Not" and inserting in lieu thereof "(3)(A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B), not"; and (2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: "(B) During fiscal years 1986 and 1987, the number of housing units that may be leased pursuant to the provisions of subparagraph (A) may be increased by 500 units for each such fiscal year. The Secretary concerned shall provide written notification to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives concerning the location, purpose, and cost of the additional units permitted by this subparagraph. Such notification shall be made periodically as the leases are entered into.". SEC. 806. SALE-AND-REPLACEMENT TRANSACTIONS

10 USC 2667a note.

Effective date. 10 USC 2667a note.

(a) EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR SALE-AND-REPLACEMENT TRANS-

ACTIONS.—(1) Section 807(c) of the Military Construction Authorization Act, 1984 (Public Law 98-115; 97 Stat. 786), is amended by striking out "October 1, 1985" and inserting in lieu thereof "October 1, 1986". (2) The amendment made by paragraph (1) shall take effect as of October 1, 1985. (b) APPROVAL OF TRANSACTIONS.—The Secretary of Defense may carry out the following sale-and-replacement transactions under the provisions of section 2667a of title 10, United States Code: (1) The sale and replacement of warehousing facilities at Schofield Barracks, Hawaii. (2) The sale and replacement of a noncommissioned officers professional education center, a band center, and a combat operations center at March Air Force Base, California. SEC. 807. TURN-KEY SELECTION PROCEDURES

(a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 169 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end of subchapter III the following new section: 10 USC 2862 Contracts.

Prohibition.

"§ 2862. Turn-key selection procedures "(a)(1) The Secretaries of the military departments, with the approval of the Secretary of Defense, may use one-step turn-key selection procedures for the purpose of entering into contracts for the construction of authorized military construction projects. "(2) In this section, 'one-step turn-key selection procedures' means procedures used for the selection of a contractor on the basis of price and other evaluation criteria to perform, in accordance with the provisions of a firm fixed-price contract, both the design and construction of a facility using performance specifications supplied by the Secretary concerned. "(b) The Secretary of a military department may not, during any fiscal year, enter into more than three contracts for military construction projects using procedures authorized by this section. "(c) The authority under this section shall expire on October 1, 1990.". O> CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the begint) ning of such subchapter is amended by adding after the item relating to section 2861 the following new item: "2862. Turn-key selection procedures.".

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 99 Part 1.djvu/1011

 PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985

99 STAT. 989

(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by this section shall take effect on October 1, 1986.

10 USC 2862 note.

SEC. 808. PARTICIPATION IN DEPARTMENT OF STATE HOUSING POOLS (a) AUTHORITY TO PARTICIPATE.—Chapter 169 of title 10, United

States Code (as amended by section 804) is further amended by Ante, p. 987. adding at the end of subchapter II the following new section: "§ 2834. Participation in Department of State housing pools 10 USC 2834. "(a) The Secretary concerned may enter into an agreement with Contracts. the Secretary of State under which the Secretary of State agrees to provide housing and related services for personnel under the jurisdiction of the Secretary concerned who are assigned to duty in a foreign country if the Secretary concerned determines— "(1) that there is a shortage of adequate housing in the area of the foreign country in which such personnel are assigned to duty; and "(2) that participation in the Department of State housing pool is the most cost-effective means of providing housing for such personnel. The Secretary concerned shall reimburse the Secretary of State, as provided in the agreement, for housing and related services furnished personnel under the jurisdiction of the Secretary concerned. "(b) Agreements entered into with the Secretary of State under Contracts. this section may not be executed until (1) the Secretary concerned provides to the appropriate committees of Congress written notification of the facts concerning the proposed agreement, and (2) a period of 21 days has elapsed after the day on which the notification is received by the committees. "(c) In computing the number of leases for which the maximum lease amount may be waived by the Secretary concerned under the second sentence of section 2828(e)(l) of this title, housing made 10 USC 2828. available to the Department of Defense under this section shall be included.". (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of such subchapter (as amended by section 804) is amended by adding at the end thereof the following new item: "2834. Participation in Department of State housing pools.". SEC. 809. UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION

Section 2805 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (a), by striking out "Within" and inserting in lieu thereof "Within an amount equal to 125 percent of; and (2) in subsection (c), by striking out "Only funds authorized for minor construction projects may be used to accomplish unspecified minor construction projects, except that the" and inserting in lieu thereof "The". SEC. 810. ACQUISITION OF INTEREST IN LAND

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2672 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by striking out "The" at the beginning of such section and inserting in lieu thereof "(a) Subject to subsection (b), the"; (2) by redesignating clauses (1) and (2) as clauses (A) and (B), respectively; (3) by striking out "$100,000" each place it appears and inserting in lieu thereof "$200,000"; and

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 99 Part 1.djvu/1012

 99 STAT. 990 Prohibition. Contracts.

PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985 (4) by adding at the end thereof the following new subsection: "(b) The Secretary of a military department may not enter into a contract under this section for the acquisition of any interest in land the cost of which exceeds $100,000 unless— "(1) the Secretary has notified the appropriate committees of Congress of his intent to acquire such interest, the cost of the interest, and the reasons for acquiring the interest; and "(2) a period of 21 days has elapsed from the date the notification is received by the committees.", (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—(1) The heading of such section is to read as follows: "§ 2672. Acquisition: interest in land when cost is not more than $200,000". (2) The item in the table of sections at the beginning of chapter 159 of such title relating to section 2672 is amended to read as follows: "2672. Acquisition: interests in land when cost is not more than $200,000.". SEC. 811. TEST OF LONG-TERM FACILITIES CONTRACTS (a) AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO LONG-TERM CONTRACTS.—Chapter

169 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end of subchapter I the following new section: 10 USC 2809. Children and youth. Water.

10 USC 2301 et seq.

Prohibition.

Prohibition.

"§ 2809. Test of long-term facilities contracts "(a)(1) The Secretary concerned may enter into contracts for the construction, management, and operation of facilities on or near military installations in the United States for the provision of child care services, waste water treatment or depot supply activities in cases in which the Secretary concerned determines that the facilities can be more efficiently and more economically provided under long-term contracts than by other appropriate means. "(2) Each contract entered into under subsection (a) shall be awarded through the use of competitive procedures as provided in chapter 137 of this title. "(3) A contract under this section may be for any period not in excess of twenty years, excluding the period for construction. A contract under this section shall include a provision that the obligation of the United States to make payments under the contract in any fiscal year is subject to the availability of appropriations for that purpose. "(4) A contract may not be entered into under this section until— "(A) the Secretary concerned submits to the appropriate committees of the Congress, in writing, a justification of the need for the facility for which the contract is to be awarded and an economic analysis (based upon accepted life cycle costing procedures) which demonstrates that the proposed contract is cost effective when compared with alternative means of furnishing the same facility; and "(B) a period of 21 calendar days has expired following the date on which the justification and the economic analysis are received by the committees. "(b) Each Secretary concerned may enter into not more than 5 contracts under the authority of subsection (a) of this section, other than contracts for child care centers. "(c) The authority to enter into contracts under this section shall expire on September 30, 1987, but shall not affect the validity of any

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 99 Part 1.djvu/1013

 PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985

99 STAT. 991

contract entered into under the authority of this section before that date.". (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter I of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item: "2809. Test of long-term facilities contracts.". SEC. 812. AVAILABILITY OF APPROPRIATIONS

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2860 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (a), by striking out "(a)" and "and except as otherwise provided under subsection (b)"; and (2) by striking out subsection (b). (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by subsection (a) 10 USC 2860 note. shall apply to funds appropriated after September 30, 1985. PART B—MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS SEC. 821. INTERSERVICE EXCHANGES

Section 2571 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: "(d) No agency or official of the executive branch of the Federal Prohibition. Government may establish any regulation, program, or policy or take any other action which precludes, directly or indirectly, the Secretaries concerned from exercising the authority provided in this section.". SEC. 822. PLAN FOR CLEANUP OF ROCKY MOUNTAIN ARSENAL

Natural resources. (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Army shall develop and Hazardous transmit to the Congress, by September 1, 1986, a report setting materials. forth a comprehensive plan for completing, not later than Septem- Waste disposal. ber 30, 1993, the cleanup of contaminated sites, structures, equip- Report.

ment, and natural resources at or near the Rocky Mountain Arsenal near Denver, Colorado. (b) SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS.—In such plan, the Secretary shall— (1) describe in detail the various phases for the project, along with the completion dates and a priority ranking of the goals for each such phase; (2) provide cost estimates for each such phase and for the total project; (3) provide findings and conclusions reached as a result of consultation, before the transmittal of the plan, with State and local officials (including officials of water districts) and the general public; (4) provide that consultation and coordination with such officials and the general public will be carried out throughout the process of cleaning up the Arsenal; (5) provide for priority cleanup of— (A) the most seriously contaminated areas at the Arsenal, including the areas known as Basin F, Basin A, the South Plants Area, and section 36; (B) other areas at the Arsenal which should be afforded priority treatment for the benefit of the general public, including the areas known as sections 7, 8, 11, and 12; and (C) any sites, structures, equipment, or natural resources located outside the Arsenal that have been contaminated by activities carried out at the Arsenal;

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 99 Part 1.djvu/1014

 99 STAT. 992

PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985 (6) provide for the cleanup of the areas described in paragraph (5) without regard to whether a final disposal site for hazardous substances from the Arsenal has been selected; (7) establish, as a priority, the use of waste-treatment technologies that will reduce significantly the amount and toxicity level of hazardous substances at or near the Arsenal; (8) provide for selection of a final disposal site for hazardous substances from the Arsenal in a manner that will take into consideration sites, within and outside of Colorado, that— (A) are geologically suitable to serve as such a disposal site; and (B) are located within areas the governing bodies of which have expressed a willingness to have such a disposal site located therein; (9) provide that all activities in the plan will be carried out in compliance with the requirements of applicable Federal and State environmental laws; (10) provide findings and conclusions reached as a result of studying the feasibility and cost of cleansing groundwater on an expedited basis at the sources of contamination on the Arsenal; and (11) include a statement concerning any reprogramming or supplemental appropriation of funds that may be necessary for fiscal year 1987 in order to assure an expeditious implementation of the plan. SEC. 823. COMMUNITY PLANNING ASSISTANCE

Grants.

20 USC 241 note.

20 USC 241.

The Secretary of Defense may use funds appropriated to the Department of Defense for fiscal year 1986 for planning and design purposes to provide planning assistance to local communities if the Secretary determines that the financial resources available to the community (by grant or otherwise) are inadequate. The Secretary may use such funds as follows: (1) To assist communities located near newly established Light Infantry Division Posts at Fort Drum, New York, and Fort Wainwright, Alaska, $500,000. (2) To assist communities located near newly established homeports under the Naval Strategic Dispersal Program at Staten Island, New York, and Everett, Washington, $500,000. SEC. 824. PLAN FOR TRANSFER OF SECTION 6 SCHOOLS (a) PLAN REQUIREMENT.—(1) The Secretary of Defense

shall

submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a plan which provides for the orderly transfer, not later than July 1, 1990, of all Section 6 Schools to the appropriate local school districts of the States in which such schools are located. (2) As used in paragraph (1), the term "Section 6 Schools" means schools of the Department of Defense established under section 6 of Public Law 81-874. (b) DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF PLAN.—The plan required by subsection (a) shall be submitted not later than March 1, 1986. SEC. 825. FURNISHING OF BEDDING FOR HOMELESS

Section 2546 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (e); and

�


text:
Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 99 Part 1.djvu/1015

 PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985

99 STAT. 993

(2) by inserting after subsection (c) the following new subsection: "(d) The Secretary concerned may provide bedding for support of shelters for the homeless that are operated by entities other than the Department of Defense. Bedding may be provided under this subsection without reimbursement, but may only be provided to the extent that the Secretary determines that the provision of such bedding will not interfere with military requirements.". SEC.

826. USE OF WATERFRONT FACILITIES AT PORT HUENEME. CALIFORNIA

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, funds received by the Navy from its license agreement with the Oxnard Harbor District for use, on an as-available basis, of the waterfront facilities at the Naval Construction Battalion Center, Port Hueneme, California, may be used for operation and maintenance of waterfront facilities at that installation. SEC. 827. MATERIAL AT NAVAL BASE, NORFOLK, VIRGINIA

The Secretary of the Navy may provide, without compensation, to the City of Norfolk, Virginia, not more than 50,000 cubic yards of dredged material located at the Naval Base, Norfolk, Virginia, if such city agrees to bear all costs and liabilities associated with loading, transporting, using, or otherwise handling such material. SEC. 828. ALTERATION IN TRAILER PARK EXPANSION, HANSCOM AIR FORCE BASE, MASSACHUSETTS (a) AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO AGREEMENT.—In providing for

the

trailer park at Hanscom Air Force Base, Massachusetts, and the expansion of such park as authorized by section 302 of the Military Construction Authorization Act, 1985 (Public Law 98-407; 98 Stat. 1508), the Secretary of the Air Force may enter into an agreement with the Massachusetts Port Authority to terminate leasehold rights of the Department of the Air Force with respect to such trailer park in exchange for— (1) leasehold rights to other land held by such Authority and acceptable to the Secretary; and (2) the construction, by such Authority, of roads, utilities, and trailer pads on such other land in accordance with specifications of the Secretary. (b) LIMITATION.—The termination of the leasehold rights by the Secretary shall not become effective until the completion of the construction described in subsection (a)(2). PART C—REAL PROPERTY TRANSACTIONS SEC.

831. LAND CONVEYANCE, DAVIS-MONTHAN AIR FORCE BASE, Recreation. TUCSON, ARIZONA Health and medical care. (a) CONGRESSIONAL FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—

(1) the highest and best use of the lands described or identified in subsection (b) is public park and recreational use or public health use; (2) the city of Tucson, Arizona, has indicated a willingness to extend the existing lease between such city and the Air Force for the lands described in subsection (c) for an additional 50 years commencing in 2002 at the existing rental rate of $773 per year;

�