text:
förryckt

Etymology
Originally the past participle of. Compare 🇨🇬 and 🇨🇬.

Adjective

 * 1) crazy, mad

Adverb

 * 1) crazily, madly

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: förryckt


text: Category:axm:Islam

title: Category:axm:Islam


text: Category:axm:Places of worship

title: Category:axm:Places of worship


text: edleste

title: edleste


text:
edelgass

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) a noble gas or inert gas

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) a noble gas or inert gas

title: edelgass


text: edelgasser

title: edelgasser


text: edelgassene

title: edelgassene


text: edelgassar

title: edelgassar


text: edelgassane

title: edelgassane


text:
πετα-

Etymology
From, from , from.

Prefix

 * 1) peta- SI unit prefix, 1015

title: πετα-


text:
εξα-

Etymology
From, from.

Prefix

 * 1) exa- SI unit prefix, 1018

title: εξα-


text:
GoH

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1)  A person invited to attend a convention, in recognition of their contributions to the convention's field, to give one or more speeches and attend convention events.

title: GoH


text:
GOH

Etymology
.

title: GOH


text: GoHs

title: GoHs


text: GOHs

title: GOHs


text:
Citations:Jolly Roger

 * 2007 September 28th,, , series 2, episode 6: “Men Without Women”, 3:52–4:12:
 * Roy:  Wait until I tell you what happened to me last night… Moss:   Well, wait till I tell you what’s just happened to me… I bought this muffin from the canteen, and I’ll be Jolly Rogered if there’s not Hyprocide in it! Curium… ebrium… and unless I’m going crazy, that’s selenium. It’s definitely Hyprocide, and it’s not even listed in the table of contents!

title: Citations:Jolly Roger


text:
trans-Mars injection

Noun

 * 1)  an orbital burn (rocket firing) used to change orbit from local orbit, to a Mars transfer orbit (a Solar orbit that will intercept the planet Mars).

Coordinate terms

 * , MTO
 * , TLI
 * , LTO
 * , GTO
 * , GTO

title: trans-Mars injection


text:
Citations:GoH

Noun: "person invited to attend a convention"

 * I do know a number of sercon types whose main pleasure at SF cons is talking with pros, and will make a decision on what cons to attend based on who's going to be there. And, to a certain extent, people go to see their friends.  That works as far as fan GoHs, too.  A lot of people who don't regularly go to Worldcons went to Magicon to see Walt Willis.
 * You need a popular/famous/realy talented artist/writer/actor/etc who is known for doing furry books/movies/art/etc for your GUEST OF HONOR. Some GOH posibilities for cons have to be asked up to two years before the con and some will only do cons if paid.  They must be transported to the con and given rooms,food and such.  Most cons do not pay bar tabs though.  Two GOHs are a good idea in case one can't make it and cancels.  Having back-ups is good to. It is posible to have a con without any famous GOHs, but it tends to hurt membership a bit.
 * Speaking for myself only, I have never been drawn to a con by the GoH, but I have often been introduced to the work of a writer as a result of their being Honoured by the con committee.
 * Explanations below, but if the space were used for the benefit of the leaders or other sub-groups, not to advance the purposes of the organization, it could end the tax-exempt status. Only thinking about it a little, I believe that comping rooms to outside GoHs is fine, as compensation for speeches, talks, &c; comping the con com is probably not; comping gofers ... erm ... it might or might not be arms-reach, but if the gofers are largely members of the people who run the club that runs the con ....
 * I do know a number of sercon types whose main pleasure at SF cons is talking with pros, and will make a decision on what cons to attend based on who's going to be there. And, to a certain extent, people go to see their friends.  That works as far as fan GoHs, too.  A lot of people who don't regularly go to Worldcons went to Magicon to see Walt Willis.
 * You need a popular/famous/realy talented artist/writer/actor/etc who is known for doing furry books/movies/art/etc for your GUEST OF HONOR. Some GOH posibilities for cons have to be asked up to two years before the con and some will only do cons if paid.  They must be transported to the con and given rooms,food and such.  Most cons do not pay bar tabs though.  Two GOHs are a good idea in case one can't make it and cancels.  Having back-ups is good to. It is posible to have a con without any famous GOHs, but it tends to hurt membership a bit.
 * Speaking for myself only, I have never been drawn to a con by the GoH, but I have often been introduced to the work of a writer as a result of their being Honoured by the con committee.
 * Explanations below, but if the space were used for the benefit of the leaders or other sub-groups, not to advance the purposes of the organization, it could end the tax-exempt status. Only thinking about it a little, I believe that comping rooms to outside GoHs is fine, as compensation for speeches, talks, &c; comping the con com is probably not; comping gofers ... erm ... it might or might not be arms-reach, but if the gofers are largely members of the people who run the club that runs the con ....
 * Speaking for myself only, I have never been drawn to a con by the GoH, but I have often been introduced to the work of a writer as a result of their being Honoured by the con committee.
 * Explanations below, but if the space were used for the benefit of the leaders or other sub-groups, not to advance the purposes of the organization, it could end the tax-exempt status. Only thinking about it a little, I believe that comping rooms to outside GoHs is fine, as compensation for speeches, talks, &c; comping the con com is probably not; comping gofers ... erm ... it might or might not be arms-reach, but if the gofers are largely members of the people who run the club that runs the con ....
 * Explanations below, but if the space were used for the benefit of the leaders or other sub-groups, not to advance the purposes of the organization, it could end the tax-exempt status. Only thinking about it a little, I believe that comping rooms to outside GoHs is fine, as compensation for speeches, talks, &c; comping the con com is probably not; comping gofers ... erm ... it might or might not be arms-reach, but if the gofers are largely members of the people who run the club that runs the con ....
 * Explanations below, but if the space were used for the benefit of the leaders or other sub-groups, not to advance the purposes of the organization, it could end the tax-exempt status. Only thinking about it a little, I believe that comping rooms to outside GoHs is fine, as compensation for speeches, talks, &c; comping the con com is probably not; comping gofers ... erm ... it might or might not be arms-reach, but if the gofers are largely members of the people who run the club that runs the con ....
 * Explanations below, but if the space were used for the benefit of the leaders or other sub-groups, not to advance the purposes of the organization, it could end the tax-exempt status. Only thinking about it a little, I believe that comping rooms to outside GoHs is fine, as compensation for speeches, talks, &c; comping the con com is probably not; comping gofers ... erm ... it might or might not be arms-reach, but if the gofers are largely members of the people who run the club that runs the con ....

title: Citations:GoH


text:
ebor

Etymology
Back-formation from oblique forms.

title: ebor


text:
пераклад

Etymology
Cognates include 🇨🇬 and 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) translation, version

title: пераклад


text: curl-ups

title: curl-ups


text: daddios

title: daddios


text:
edelmetall

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) a precious metal

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) a precious metal

title: edelmetall


text:
Appendix:Middle Welsh pronunciation

The charts below show the way in which the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) represents Middle Welsh pronunciations in Wiktionary entries.

title: Appendix:Middle Welsh pronunciation


text:
Gordon setter

Etymology
The Kennel Club applied the name Gordon Setter to the breed in 1924, after Alexander Gordon, 4th Duke of Gordon (1743–1827).

Noun

 * 1) A breed of large black and tan setter.

title: Gordon setter


text: edelmetallet

title: edelmetallet


text: edelmetaller

title: edelmetaller


text:
vroegrijp

Etymology
. Cognate with Geman.

Adjective

 * 1) precocious

Usage notes

 * Has stronger sexual connotations (i.e. of sexual precociousness; compare and the semantics of  in general) than its synonyms, but it also commonly used in a sexually neutral way.

title: vroegrijp


text: edelmetalla

title: edelmetalla


text: edelmetallene

title: edelmetallene


text: Category:Suzhou numerals

title: Category:Suzhou numerals


text:
Talk:alia

.
Alia, Alius, Aliud = other, another (Classical Latin) Alia, Alius, Aliud = other, another

title: Talk:alia


text:
Talk:intrat

.
Intrat, Intro, Intrant = he/she enters (Classical Latin) Intrat = he/she enters
 * Our Latin verb lemmata are at the first-person singular present active indicative . — Ungoliant (falai) 19:09, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:intrat


text:
Template talk:l/grc

Linking problems
This template needs to invoke Module:languages to enable macra- and brachia-stripping. The absence of autotransliteration is sometimes desireable, but I think such diacritic-stripping is always needed. — I.S.M.E.T.A. 16:50, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

RFD discussion: June 2015–January 2022

 * See Template talk:l/bg.

title: Template talk:l/grc


text: Category:Requests for quotations/Apollonius Dyscolus


text: forekommende

title: forekommende


text:
mogyoróhagyma

Noun

 * 1) shallot

title: mogyoróhagyma


text: mogyoróhagymák

title: mogyoróhagymák


text:
User talk:93.196.229.133

Ad Special:Diff/29912345, we have for that. — Keφr 17:52, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

title: User talk:93.196.229.133


text:
λυπάμαι

Verb

 * 1)  to be sorry
 * 2)  to feel sorry for, to pity, to take pity on
 * 1)  to feel sorry for, to pity, to take pity on

title: λυπάμαι


text:
al's

Adverb

 * 1) * 1619-1621 (1898 edition), John Philipot (original author), Robert Hovenden (editor), The Visitation of Kent: Taken in the Years 1619-1623, page 191:
 * Wilkison al's Egbury
 * Wilkison al's Egbury

title: al's


text:
psychol

Noun

 * 1)  crazy; loon; fruitcake

title: psychol


text:
jebaka

Noun

 * 1)  manwhore; womanizer

title: jebaka


text:
superledende

Adjective

 * 1) superconductive

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) superconductive

title: superledende


text:
cnotka

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) prude; sexually reluctant person

title: cnotka


text: grafting tools

title: grafting tools


text:
Talk:ὀξεῖα

Apollonius Dyscolus citation
Does the following passage (from here) use in the relevant sense?
 * Συμβέβηκε τῶν ἀντωνυμιῶν ἃς μὲν ὀρθοτονεῖσθαι, τουτέστι τὸν κατὰ φύσιν τόνον ἔχειν, ἃς δὲ ἐγκλίνεσθαι, ὧν τὸ τέλος, λέγω δὴ τῶν ἐγκλινομένων, ἢ φύσει ὀξύνεται ἢ δυνάμει, ὡς τὰ περισπώμενα. ἐν αὑτοῖς γὰρ ἔχει ὀξεῖαν. ἥτις μεθίσταται κατὰ τὴν ἄρχουσαν συλλαβήν, ὡς ἐπὶ τῶν τετραχρόνων, ἥρπασέ τις ἥμων, ἢ κατὰ τὸ τέλος τῆς ὑπερκειμένης λέξεως, ὡς ἐπὶ τῶν ἐλάττονας χρόνους ἀναδεξαμένων, τοῦ τονικοῦ οὐκ ἐμποδίζοντος, ἀνθρώποις μοι, τίς τάρ σφωε (Α 8).

— I.S.M.E.T.A. 18:26, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:ὀξεῖα


text:
kitajec

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1)  Chink, gook; Chinese person
 * 2)  fraud, fraudster

title: kitajec


text: ὀξεῖαν

title: ὀξεῖαν


text:
latarniowiec

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) lightship

title: latarniowiec


text:
homolover

Etymology
or.

Noun

 * 1)  One who likes or supports homosexual people.

title: homolover


text:
tankowiec

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) tanker

title: tankowiec


text:
Wiktionary:Votes/2014-11/Entries which do not meet CFI to be deleted even if there is a consensus to keep

Entries which do not meet CFI to be deleted even if there is a consensus to keep

 * Voting on: making it official policy to delete entries which do not meet WT:CFI to be deleted even if there is a consensus to keep.

Rationale: deletion debates have turned into a matter of personal opinion, whether certain editors like a certain entry, made it themselves, etc. This vote would meet that admins have an obligation to delete entries that do not satisfy the criteria laid out in WT:CFI even if there as a consensus (by which I mean a numerical consensus, by counting the number of votes) to keep the entries. Instead of simply counting up the number of votes, the closing admin should look at the arguments made to see if the entry meets CFI (rather than keep because I made this entry or keep because my mother used this word 20 years ago).

As a result, debates would become about whether an entry meets CFI rather than just about the number of votes an entry gets.

 * Vote starts: 00:01, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Vote ends: 23:59, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Vote extended to 23:59, 30 January 2015 (UTC) --Dan Polansky (talk) 09:50, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

 * Vote created: Renard Migrant (talk) 18:47, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Discussion:
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] Beer parlour/2014/November
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] Wiktionary talk:Votes/2014-11/Entries which do not meet CFI to be deleted even if there is a consensus to keep

Support

 * 1)  Consensus should reflect CFI. If not, then CFI itself is the problem and it should be modified, not just circumvented whenever people feel like it. —CodeCat 13:28, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Then why did User:CodeCat create on 6 March 2014 to label and keep certain words not meeting current CFI, without first changing CFI? --Dan Polansky (talk) 11:23, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Why do you ask? —CodeCat 14:38, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
 * 1)  Renard Migrant (talk) 18:04, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
 * 2) . — Ungoliant (falai) 21:37, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
 * 3)  Agree with CodeCat. I also more or less agree with the opposing comment that it's impossible to implement, but still support in theory. Equinox ◑ 21:55, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
 * 4)  It would be nice if arguments in favor of keeping were couched in terms of CFI. CFI can be changed. DCDuring TALK  18:19, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
 * 5)  Consensus should reflect CFI. Leasnam (talk) 10:49, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
 * It is the other way around: CFI should be updated to reflect consensus. Since we have not managed to make CFI reflect consensus so far, rigid application of CFI is undesirable. We have plentiful evidence about the history and origin of CFI, and we know that it did not originate by consensus. --Dan Polansky (talk) 09:31, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Right, CFI should reflect consensus. —Stephen (Talk) 20:37, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
 * 1)  Votes are great and all, but if we base our entries on whether the beliefs of more individuals say we should keep, this dictionary will end up having lots of unwelcome content. If you know what I mean by that. I believe that entries should only be voted on if there is some way that CFI isn't working too well for the process. That being said, by the way, I still think cult film should be deleted. When I made this entry, I was not used to the site, so I didn't know what an SOP was.  Rædi Stædi Yæti  {- skriv til mig -} 20:42, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
 * I think some of your recent entries come under the classification of "unwelcome content" - e.g. catfucker. And then you have the nerve to say that SoP entries should be removed. The mind boggles. Donnanz (talk) 12:42, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Single words cannot be SOPs. And if you think this entry should be removed, challenge it in RFV. I never said you couldn't do that, and as this is a wiki, my contributions here are treated the same as everyone else's. Rædi Stædi Yæti  {- skriv til mig -} 21:22, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1)  Impossible to implement.  Requires little or no ambiguity of CFI; CFI will likely forever remain ambiguous and will probably never satisfactorily address every possible case.  I continue to believe that RfD discussions should be decided primarily on consensus of the participants, and am disheartened that this proposal could potentially lead to the deletion of a greater number of articles. Pur ple back pack 89   05:15, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
 * I do agree. However, we should keep the CFI rule, but if CFI doesn't have a solution to the entry's specific problem, we should rely on consensus. That is my personal opinion. Rædi Stædi Yæti  {- skriv til mig -} 05:26, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) * Query:
 * How often do we get situations where there is consensus to keep a term, but that consensus is in opposition to WT:CFI?
 * If there is consensus to keep a roterm, there should presumably be a rationale, something based on Wiktionary norms and policies that backs up this consensus. If CFI does not describe these norms and policies sufficiently, then the error is in the CFI.
 * Note: We do not need CFI to be explicit in all details and to cover all cases. That would be ideal, but that just ain't gonna happen in the real world: process documentation never exactly matches reality, that's just a given.  That said, CFI can be updated to cover the broader majority of cases, and to leave wiggle room for those cases that it does not cover.  The fact that CFI cannot be revised to describe everything is not a valid argument for ignoring it entirely.  ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │ Tala við mig 06:41, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
 * How many? This is really a question for you, not I.  I know you believe it to be a significant number, and a too-high one, but I don't know what that number. Pur ple back pack 89   21:24, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Of course it comes down to interpretation of CFI. The question I would ask myself is how many entries are kept where there's no interpretation of CFI to justify them. It would be very difficult to talk about numbers. Maybe a couple a week in recent weeks? Renard Migrant (talk) 21:45, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
 * 1)  We should add various other rules to CFI, namely - translation target when an English term is a SoP but it is a single term in a few foreign languages, Lemming test - when a term is used in certain dictionaries (the list can be agreed on). It still won't cover all situation, like gas station, mobile phone, foreign language, nominative case, lung cancer, etc. where a vote would still be required. Translation target and Lemmings would heavily reduce valuable time spent on RFD's. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 06:54, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
 * 2) * It sounds like you're saying that CFI should be updated, in order to make CFI more useful in evaluating RFDs.  This sounds like you don't oppose the underlying idea -- that CFI should be used for arbitration, rather than just group agreement without regard for CFI.
 * Am I understanding you correctly here? If so, your vote would be support or abstain, no?  ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │ Tala við mig 07:59, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, until CFI is updated to include the above two, I am opposing. I would change or reconsider, if there are changes to CFI. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 08:02, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
 * I've always supported the proposal of such a policy (allow words from other major dictionaries). I would oppose it but, I'm not convinced it would be massively unpopular. I'm surprised nobody's proposed it at all in vote form. Renard Migrant (talk) 18:09, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I've been meaning to get around to it. But if I propose it, that'll automatically be 2-3 oppose votes right there.  BTW, what's the answer to Eirikr's question about how often there is a consensus to ignore CFI? Pur ple back pack 89   19:00, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
 * 1)  If there is a consensus to keep a word and CFI states that it should be deleted, then CFI must be changed accordingly, because CFI should reflect this consensus. Discussions are useful when intelligent arguments can be exchanged: if reflection is forbidden because CFI must be applied blindly, then discussions are useless. Lmaltier (talk) 21:01, 24 November 2014 (UTC) In other terms, the sequence should not be: 1. delete. 2. improve CFI. 3. restore (this is illogical). but rather: 1. take the keep decision. 2. discuss on how CFI should be improved to reflect this consensus. 3. improve CFI. Lmaltier (talk) 21:18, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
 * CFI has a much stronger consensus than a single RFD discussion. So it's not illogical; it would be illogical if the consensus of the few people who participated in the RFD would trump the consensus of the dozens of people who were involved in shaping CFI over the years. —CodeCat 21:34, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) * Similar to CodeCat's argument, I would caution strongly against assuming that consensus should be taken at face value just because it's consensus. Iff the consensus is based on reasoned argument, and that reasoned argument calls for an outcome in contravention of CFI, then yes, CFI probably needs changing.  If, however, the consensus is not backed up by reasoned argument, then this consensus must be ignored in favor of CFI, which at least has been through an extensive vetting process that (presumably) involves reasoned argument and consensus.  ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │ Tala við mig 21:59, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
 * 2) ** Of course, I fully agree with you. Lmaltier (talk) 17:50, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
 * 3) *** I think that's more of an argument for deleting CFI all together and just going purely with consensus. I mean, how could you possibly update CFI after every deletion debate. And more importantly, why bother? Renard Migrant (talk) 12:02, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
 * 4) ****There's a happy medium between the two poles you posit. It's called making CFI a guideline.  Something that's generally accepted, but need not be followed to the letter. Pur ple back pack 89   22:29, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
 * 5) *** Anyway, nothing is perfect, and certainly not CFI. CFI must be improved with time. Lmaltier (talk) 06:50, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
 * 6)  We can create policies. We can't compel everyone to interpret said policies in precisely the same manner. There will always be cases in which it isn't clear-cut whether or not a term meets CFI because not everyone has the same interpretation of things like "sum of parts." Such cases require a subjective judgment about the term's fitness for inclusion to be made. The RfD process exists so that all Wiktionarians can partake in such determinations, sharing their individual thoughts on the inclusion-worthiness of nominated words, and thus help reach a consensus. Allowing for the outcome of RfD discussions to be overridden at the personal discretion of administrators would be completely contrary to the community-driven nature of this project. -Cloudcuckoolander (talk) 08:55, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
 * “Allowing for the outcome of RfD discussions to be overridden at the personal discretion of administrators” -- I don't follow you. Where does administrator whim come into the discussion?  ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │ Tala við mig 10:03, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
 * When it's closed. Pur ple back pack 89  17:09, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
 * "Instead of simply counting up the number of votes, the closing admin should look at the arguments made to see if the entry meets CFI."
 * That means that, under this proposal, the closing admin would make a subjective judgment about which arguments hold the most merit, and thus decide whether the entry warrants keeping. But there is no single correct interpretation of CFI (particularly SOP). Two people can look at the same entry and reach differing conclusions about its inclusion-worthiness. And that's why the RfD process allows us to weigh different viewpoints and reach a consensus. Leaving it up to admin whim, in short, would be a disaster. It would be giving the closing admin license to favour arguments with which they agree over arguments with which they disagree, and thus give them the power to impose their own personal personal preferences over community consensus. -Cloudcuckoolander (talk) 22:47, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
 * But if the result of RFD is consensus, then how do we know what that consensus is unless someone decides what it is? —CodeCat 23:03, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
 * No one needs to decide that consensus exists. It will be objectively apparent. -Cloudcuckoolander (talk) 23:24, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Nothing will ever be apparent to Purple unless it is what he wanted. Equinox ◑ 02:51, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
 * What's consensus is apparent to me, thank you very much. I see no reason why you needed to say it wasn't.  This is about CFI, not about me. Pur ple back pack 89   14:19, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
 * (This is Zeggazo btw). I believe the existing process is fine. There are some words which are very common in blogosphere but have unluckily not been picked up in permanently recorded media. If we allow some grey areas wiktionary will get more of these blogosphere type words. 2.96.221.56 10:23, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't think unregistered users are allowed to vote. If I knew the name of the vote I'd look it up. Renard Migrant (talk) 11:44, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Indeed they are not (the instructions cannot be understood any other way). Struck. — Keφr 09:51, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
 * See Votes/2010-04/Voting policy. --Dan Polansky (talk) 11:47, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
 * 1)  --Dan Polansky (talk) 22:43, 28 November 2014 (UTC). It must be possible to override CFI on a case-by-case basis, as e.g. for olinguito. The long-standing tradition in RFD of keeping terms for which there is no consensus for deletion should be continued. Translation target should continue to be a consideration for those who feel this is a valid extra-CFI concern, as well as lemmings (keep a possibly sum-of-parts term when certain monolingual dictionaries, not WordNet, include the term; see also the Beer parlour discussion), and set phrase. The CFI as a whole as it is without modification is not supported by consensus, and the principle of consensus should prevail over any statutory document like CFI. That said, CFI should be used as a recommendation (rather than an inviolable rigid rule), with exceptions being justified, and thus should not be entirely ignored when deciding whether to keep an entry. Each argument for keeping should be based on CFI as far as possible. The non-rigid approach I have outlined seems to be implemented in WT:ELE as per WT:ELE, a section that is lacking from CFI: "While the information below may represent some kind of “standard” form, it is not a set of rigid rules." --Dan Polansky (talk) 22:43, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
 * If this vote fails, what we oughta do is demote CFI from policy to guideline. I think you're correct that most of the major editors here are dissatisfied with CFI as written.  Having the "what's in, what's out" page as policy and not guideline is unusual for a project anyway.  If CFI was demoted to guideline, that would allow the overriding you want. Pur ple back pack 89   02:14, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
 * What is a "guideline"? — Keφr 19:13, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
 * A guideline is one step down from policy. The main difference is that policy has to be followed 100% of the time, but guidelines don't. Pur ple back pack 89   19:38, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't think we'll need to 'demote' it. It'll become a lame duck. In fact I don't think any policies will have any weight any more. People will just say if there's no vote forcing me to apply this policy, why bother? Renard Migrant (talk) 22:16, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
 * You seem to be taking the de facto, and I the de jure. Pur ple back pack 89  00:20, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Re: "I don't think any policies will have any weight any more.": I don't agree with this all-or-nothing view. CFI is a useful policy and is largely followed, with exceptions being argued on a case-by-case basis. The entries kept despite current CFI are fairly few and are mostly exceptions to WT:CFI rather than WT:CFI; have a look e.g. at and  to see how many they are. "Sum of parts" is still a valid reason for nomination for RFD, just that multiple editors are in the habit of examining redeeming qualities of terms so nominated. CFI still does a useful service as a policy applied with a certain, fairly low, flexibility. --Dan Polansky (talk) 09:43, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
 * There's a term for a policy with flexibility. It's called a guideline.  And CFI should be one, preferably one with SOP stripped from it.  The problem with CFI being policy is not only the lack of flexibility afforded, but the need for it to apply universally.  I think it's clear there are blind spots in CFI.  If CFI were a guideline, that wouldn't be as much of an issue, and we could address the blind spots as they come up with routine consensus. Pur ple back pack 89   21:51, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
 * If there is truly "routine consensus" then you ought to have no problem getting it voted in as policy! Equinox ◑ 22:08, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
 * You seem to be arguing that I posit that WP:IDIOM WT:IDIOM be merged into WP:CFI WT:CFI. There's no reason for CFI to mention every little thing that survived an RfD.  Far better to have it be a guideline with gray areas that can just be addressed when they come up. Pur ple back pack 89   22:21, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
 * What is "WP:IDIOM" and "WP:CFI"? — Keφr 22:33, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
 * 1)  The situation does not arise. If there's a consensus to keep, then there's a consensus that the entry does meet WT:CFI. CFI has more than one possible interpretation; it's not objective, nor should it be. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 07:32, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Re: "If there's a consensus to keep, then there's a consensus that the entry does meet WT:CFI": Not really. If I vote based on translation target consideration and I know that it is not part of WT:CFI, then my vote does not indicate that I want to keep the entry via CFI. It is fair to say that translation target consideration is not part of current CFI. --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:25, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Yeah this is clearly false; I could vote to delete an entry based on a prejudice because of who created the entry; would you argue that that's part of CFI? If so where is it? Renard Migrant (talk) 13:17, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
 * If you wanna talk about stuff like that, look up how often "redundant" and "redundancy" appear in CFI. Pur ple back pack 89  19:40, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Why? Renard Migrant (talk) 22:16, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Because neither word is used in CFI. There are a number of legitimate arguments that you, I, or anyone would agree to that are not explicitly spelled out in CFI Pur ple back pack 89   00:20, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Indeed. In fact CFI says nothing about content being correct. Renard Migrant (talk) 12:26, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Maybe I missed some sarcasm, but I think "correctness" is covered by WT:CFI. — Keφr 12:49, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
 * I suppose it is. Renard Migrant (talk) 13:06, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Redundancy and correctness are different issues Pur ple back pack 89  16:01, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
 * I fully agree (in case that wasn't clear). Accord to CFI, there's no reason not to have two identical meanings, because if one meets CFI, so does the other. Renard Migrant (talk) 16:49, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
 * 1)  I can't think of any good reason to support this proposal. The main problem with CFI is that the rules are overinterpreted or misinterpreted by beady-eyed would-be deletionists. There is nothing in CFI which specifically says that SoP entries should be deleted. Yet birthday present was deleted and Christmas present survived for devious reasons. I know common sense should prevail, thus red dress doesn't qualify, but little black dress does, and little black number has been overlooked. One problem I find is with translation targets, especially from languages where compound words are commonplace: I was trying to find a home for barnesoldat (child soldier) on the English side, and had to settle for an entry under soldier and hope that it would be seen there. So I think provision should be made in CFI for translation targets. Donnanz (talk) 11:50, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Actually, [[Christmas present]] was deleted in the nominated sense. That another sense was considered idiomatic is a separate matter. — Keφr 12:08, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
 * I think that using soldier for the translation barnesoldat was the right place. I fully agree with you, except for using translation target as a criterion in CFI, which would make the objective of the project very confusing (e.g. thousands of little ... pages would be created). The only criterion should be does this belong to the vocabulary of the language?. This would be a clear and simple basic principle. Lmaltier (talk) 22:26, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
 * I am happy for you agreeing with me, but why are you replying to me right here? — Keφr 18:10, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
 * I think Lmaltier's comment was directed at me. Donnanz (talk) 18:42, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
 * I agree. That's what paper dictionaries use, limited by the amount of paper they have. Pur ple back pack 89   23:12, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Paper dictionaries are limited by what they can squeeze into one volume. The more comprehensive dictionaries are published in more than one volume, and are rather expensive I imagine. The Oxford Dictionary of English has 2088 pages; my Duden Deutsches Universalwörterbuch has 2016 pages and is falling apart due to poor binding. An online dictionary such as Wiktionary doesn't have this restriction with modern technology, and can be super-massive and cater for translation targets. It may not be as bad as you fear, Lmaltier. Donnanz (talk) 09:45, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Of course, it would be feasible, I agree. But it would be confusing: users of a dictionary don't look for translations targets, they look for a term of a language. For the same reason, I would group all phrasebook entries in topical appendices and remove them for the mainspace, but I would add attested words from fictional universes to the mainspace from appendices (with special rules for proper nouns, of course). Lmaltier (talk) 21:29, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Kindersoldat appears in Duden online, but not my copy; this may prove my point about online dictionaries, they can be updated more quickly than paper dictionaries anyway - in fact paper dictionaries may be phased out in the future, who knows?. Donnanz (talk) 10:15, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Paper dictionaries are likely to be used less and less, but they keep real advantages: 1. The pleasure of paper book pages. 2. They are available at any moment, no need to start a computer. 3. They must be bought once, but consulting them is 100% free. We are not bought, but users consulting us spend some money at each consultation (think to power they use). Lmaltier (talk) 21:36, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Paper dictionaries have a lease on life until we adopt the lemming principle. As long as there are words print dictionaries have that we don't, people will have to buy them rather than get those words here for free. Pur ple back pack 89   21:50, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
 * 1)  —Stephen (Talk) 03:06, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Stephen: Any particular reasons? — Keφr 11:29, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
 * CFI has too many flaws. It was written and edited by inexperienced amateur lexicographers. If we start to attract editors with more experience in lexicography, I don’t think they should be hobbled by earlier editors with little knowledge of the field. CFI can be edited and rewritten, but it seems to be rather difficult to make any substantive changes to it. Perhaps if there is a consensus to keep some terms, it will be an incentive to improve CFI. —Stephen (Talk) 20:34, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Though a few users argued that habitually ignoring CFI at the whim of circumstance will disincentivise improving CFI (as in "why bother conducting bureaucracy over updating something that is ignored on a daily basis anyway?"). Your comment on that? — Keφr 21:12, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
 * I think it’s nonsense. The difficulty in getting enough agreement to improve CFI, coupled with the problem of inexperienced lexicographers trying to come up with improvements, is what disincentivizes improving CFI. —Stephen (Talk) 23:06, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
 * How much incentive we have to fix CFI doesn't override my belief that CFI is broken beyond repair. There's no way it's ever going to be able to mention every reason we've used to keep an article.  This is why it is foolish for CFI to be policy. Pur ple back pack 89   23:35, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Nonsense. It's true that WT:CFI can never specify every case, but it doesn't have to, as long as it doesn't claim to. Some things can be explicitly included by policy, and some things can be explicitly excluded by policy, and some things can be (either explicitly or implicitly) left open by policy. In fact, there are already some cases where WT:CFI explicitly doesn't specify whether or not they can be included: see Criteria for inclusion. —Ruakh TALK 05:08, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Word. Agree absolutely with Ruakh. --Dan Polansky (talk) 09:11, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Stephen G. Brown, if you think that users on this project are not competent enough to enact sensible criteria for inclusion, then you probably have no reason to believe they can make sensible decisions by "consensus" in individual deletion discussions either. You might as well give up on this project entirely. It is not just CFI that is written by amateurs: everything is written by amateurs, a fact that is not going to change very soon. Those "editors with more experience in lexicography" you speak of are not going to fall from the sky — but when they do come, I expect they will provide some input on how CFI should be changed, which surely will not be ignored. For the time being, I can stick to rules written by amateurs.
 * And I even disagree on the "inexperienced" part: Category:Archived discussions contains over ten thousand pages of RFVs and RFDs. I assume at least some still-active regulars have witnessed or participated in a large part of these discussions. There is plenty of precedent on which to build something. If only someone cared enough. — Keφr 18:23, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
 * You make a lot of assumptions about what I think, and jump to a lot of bad conclusions about what I believe. As for what I should do, I think I am a better judge of what I should do than you, which may account for the fact that I have not sought your opinion in the matter. As for what you can do, I’m sure you know best and I wouldn’t have it any other way. And as to the "inexperienced" part, I was talking about a different kind of experience, not experience in RFVs and RFDs. —Stephen (Talk) 01:48, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Re: "...habitually ignoring CFI...": We are not ignoring CFI, since, in RFD, we are taking it into consideration, albeit not as the ultimate arbiter allowing no exceptions; in RFV, exceptions to CFI are very rare. Multiple of us override CFI in RFD not on a whim but rather in a reasoned manner, applying common sense and lexicographical sense of what is good for a multilingual dictionary with a broad range of international readership with various backgrounds, needs, and language skills. Furthermore, despite e.g. "translation target" being mentioned by RFD voters for past multiple years, that did not stop us from improving CFI. One of the latest substantive improvements even made CFI more strict, including less: Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2014-03/CFI: Removing usage in a well-known work 3. --Dan Polansky (talk) 09:11, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) per Stephen's arguments, which I agree with. --Neskaya sprecan? 16:47, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Abstain

 * 1) I abstain for reasons I already stated in the linked BP discussion. — Keφr 21:40, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
 * 2)  --Romanophile (talk) 18:04, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
 * 3)  We've already had enough problems with admins enforcing their unilateral interpretations of the CFI by listing words at WT:RFV and making up rules that the citations supposedly have to meet. The proposal here seems to be that even admins who would prefer to make decisions consensually, will instead be expected to make them unilaterally. I definitely recognize the problem that this proposal is trying to address, and I agree with most of the "support" voters' comments — if there is a consensus that something should be kept, then we should fix WT:CFI rather than flout it — but I just can't bring myself to support the proposal as written. —Ruakh TALK 22:01, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
 * @Ruakh: any specific case comes to your mind? — Keφr 18:24, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
 * One class of examples is sub-word morphemes. WT:CFI says only that they are acceptable, with no details, but that has not stopped people from crediting it with surprisingly detailed rules. (See Talk:-os for one example.) —Ruakh TALK 04:29, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Decision

 * Closed as not enacted: No consensus to enact. 7 in favor and 9 against. Pur ple back pack 89   00:08, 31 January 2015 (UTC)


text:
bakburta

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1)  port

title: bakburta


text:
superleder

Noun

 * 1) superconductor

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  a superconductor

title: superleder


text:
sterburta

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1)  starboard

title: sterburta


text:
parowóz

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) steam locomotive

title: parowóz


text: superlederen

title: superlederen


text: superledere

title: superledere


text:
funkcjonariusz

Etymology
, from.

Noun

 * 1) official, officer, agent, functionary

title: funkcjonariusz


text: superlederne

title: superlederne


text:
dziupla

Etymology
, from, from. Ultimately from. Cognate to 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) tree hollow
 * 2)  chop shop
 * 1)  chop shop

title: dziupla


text: Category:dsb:Owls

title: Category:dsb:Owls


text:
Thread:User talk:Kephir/Polish noun templates - tantum parameter

Would it be a lot of work to add a parameter called  to the existing Polish noun templates, taking   or   as its value, so that e.g.   would work just like  ?

This would reduce the amount of work needed to add singular-only and plural-only words.


text:
starczy

Etymology 1
From.

Adjective

 * 1) senile, gerontic, related to old age

title: starczy


text: Category:Middle Welsh appendices

title: Category:Middle Welsh appendices


text:
starczyć

Etymology
, from, from. .

Verb

 * 1)  to suffice

Conjugation
Note: the imperative form is almost never used. First and second person forms are rare.

title: starczyć


text:
User:Armineaghayan

Arminé Aghayan

title: User:Armineaghayan


text: ὀξείᾳ

title: ὀξείᾳ


text:
wnyki

Noun

 * 1) snare, animal trap, especially one used by poachers
 * 2)  beating, flogging
 * 1)  beating, flogging

title: wnyki


text:
ácido crisofânico

Noun

 * 1)  chrysophanic acid a dioxymethylanthraquinone found in rhubarb

title: ácido crisofânico


text:
ziguezaguear

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to zigzag move in a zigzag manner

title: ziguezaguear


text:
kryjówka

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) hideout; hiding place

title: kryjówka


text:
kłusować

Etymology 1
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to trot

Etymology 2
From, a dialectal form of + , with an original meaning of "to pull grain ears secretly from someone else's field".

Verb

 * 1)  to poach

title: kłusować


text:
xenotransplante

Noun

 * 1) xenotransplantation transplantation into a different species

title: xenotransplante


text:
xeretar

Verb

 * 1)  to pry to look where one is not welcome; to be nosey

title: xeretar


text:
xibiu

Noun

 * 1)  pussy the female genitalia

title: xibiu


text:
prawiczek

Noun

 * 1) virgin

title: prawiczek


text:
romtemperatur

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) room temperature

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) room temperature

title: romtemperatur


text:
xingamento

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  insult speech intended to be rude

title: xingamento


text:
xiri

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * : buying, shopping

Noun

 * 1)  pussy the female genitalia

title: xiri


text: Dunán

title: Dunán


text:
cyberjihadist

Noun

 * 1) One who acts like a jihadist on the Internet or in cyberspace

title: cyberjihadist


text: cyberjihadists

title: cyberjihadists


text:
wolfhound irlandês

Noun

 * 1) Irish wolfhound a sighthound used to hunt wolves

title: wolfhound irlandês


text:
Thread:User talk:Kephir/Polish noun templates - tantum parameter/reply

I had the same idea for the longest time (except I named the argument num)… but I never really got around to implement it.

Anyway, it works now for. If someone moves the rest of the specialised declension patterns into Module:pl-noun (and switches templates to use that module), they shall start supporting it too.


text:
Somalization

Noun

 * 1) The process of Somalizing

title: Somalization


text:
wikificação

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  the process of converting a website or system into a wiki

title: wikificação


text:
einschiffig

Adjective

 * 1) (of a church) single-nave; having a single nave
 * die einschiffige Kirche in Watzenborn-Steinberg

title: einschiffig


text:
Sudanization

Noun

 * 1) The process of Sudanizing

title: Sudanization


text: romtemperaturen

title: romtemperaturen


text:
überzwerch

Etymology
From (15th century; cp. ). See  and.

Adjective

 * 1) crossed, (turned) crosswise; turned, especially in an inappropriate way
 * 2)  crotchety
 * 3)  fesswise; turned sideways
 * 1)  fesswise; turned sideways

title: überzwerch


text:
Sudanism

Noun

 * 1) A characteristically Sudanese cultural feature, such as a belief, custom or linguistic feature.

title: Sudanism


text:
Kenyanism

Noun

 * 1) A characteristically Kenyan cultural feature, such as a belief, custom or linguistic feature.

title: Kenyanism


text:
aller au lit

Verb

 * 1)  to go to bed

title: aller au lit


text:
Ethiopianism

Noun

 * 1) A sociopolitical movement seeking to unify those of African heritage (Ethiopians) into a global community.

title: Ethiopianism


text:
Ethiopianization

Noun

 * 1) The process of Ethiopianizing

title: Ethiopianization


text:
Saalkirche

Noun

 * 1) aisleless church, single-nave church which consists of a single room which is not divided into aisles by columns

title: Saalkirche


text:
Moroccanization

Noun

 * 1) The process of Moroccanizing

title: Moroccanization


text:
Moroccanism

Noun

 * 1) A characteristically Moroccan cultural feature, such as a belief, custom or linguistic feature.

title: Moroccanism


text:
Somalist

Noun

 * 1) A proponent of Somalism.

title: Somalist


text: Somalists

title: Somalists


text:
Sudanist

Noun

 * 1) A proponent of Sudanism.

title: Sudanist


text: Sudanists

title: Sudanists


text:
voz média

Noun

 * 1)  middle voice form in which the subject of a verb performs some action upon itself

title: voz média


text:
Thread:User talk:Kephir/Polish noun templates - tantum parameter/reply (2)

Seems to work, with the exception that is not added.


text:
Thread:User talk:Kephir/Polish noun templates - tantum parameter/reply (3)

Fixed.


text:
variólico

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1)  variolous of or pertaining to smallpox

title: variólico


text:
vulcão-escudo

Noun

 * 1)  shield volcano volcano with a large size an low profile

title: vulcão-escudo


text:
voz passiva

Noun

 * 1)  passive voice voice in which the subject receives the action

title: voz passiva


text: radioaktivt

title: radioaktivt


text:
vodu

Noun

 * 1) voodoo an Afro-Caribbean religion

title: vodu


text:
vitimização secundária

Noun

 * 1) secondary victimization

title: vitimização secundária


text:
nước ngoài

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) a foreign country

Adjective

 * 1) foreign

title: nước ngoài


text:
definitorisk

Adjective

 * 1) definitional

title: definitorisk


text:
definerlig

Adjective

 * 1) definable

title: definerlig


text:
Thread:User talk:Kephir/Polish noun templates - tantum parameter/reply (4)

Regarding conversions: should not be converted just yet. I need to check whether there are any remaining users of num first.


text: definitoriske

title: definitoriske


text: maçacocoliço

title: maçacocoliço


text:
vroegvolwassen

Etymology
.

Adjective

 * 1) precocious

title: vroegvolwassen


text:
salpetersyre

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) nitric acid

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) nitric acid

title: salpetersyre


text:
halalify

Verb

 * 1)  To make halal.

title: halalify


text: halalifies

title: halalifies


text: halalifying

title: halalifying


text: halalified

title: halalified


text: salpetersyren

title: salpetersyren


text:
Citations:fraternal birth order effect

Noun: "the scientific observation that a man's statistical probability of being gay increases with the number of older brothers he has"

 * 2008, Glenn Wilson & Qazi Rahman, Born Gay: The Psychobiology of Sex Orientation, Peter Owen (2008), ISBN 9780720613094, page 98:
 * Thus the fraternal birth order effect is specific to male sexual orientation, and does not affect female sexual orientation.
 * 2010, Mark J. T. Sargeant, "Brain and Behaviour: Sex Differences", in Essential Psychology: A Concise Introduction (eds. Philip Banyard, Mark N. O. Davies, Christine Norman, & Belinda Winder), SAGE Publications (2010), ISBN 9781847875372, page 183:
 * The influence of the fraternal birth order effect is not mediated by a male growing up with older stepbrothers but is influenced by them having biological brothers (who share the same mother) regardless of whether they are raised together or apart (Bogaert, 2006).
 * 2012, Alexander K. Hill, "Biological Foundations of Sexual Orientation", in Handbook of Psychology and Sexual Orientation (eds. Charlotte J. Patterson & Anthony R. D'Augelli), Oxford University Press (2012), ISBN 9780199765218, page 62:
 * Blanchard and Klassen (1997) proposed the maternal immune hypothesis to explain the fraternal birth order effect.
 * 2013, Mark Cook, Levels of Personality, Cambridge University Press (2013), ISBN 9781107021044, page 310:
 * They estimate one in seven gay men 'owes his sexual orientation to the fraternal birth order effect'.
 * 2014, Tuck C. Ngun & Eric Vilain, "The Biological Basis of Human Sexual Orientation: Is There a Role for Epigenetics?", in Epigenetic Shaping of Sociosexual Interactions: From Plants to Humans (ed. Daisuke Yamamota), Academic Press (2014), ISBN 9780128002223, page 172:
 * The fraternal birth order effect is one of the most replicated and robust findings in sexual orientation research. Each son increases the odds of homosexuality in the next son by 33% relative to the base population rate

title: Citations:fraternal birth order effect


text: broken bad

title: broken bad


text: breaks bad

title: breaks bad


text:
tesourinha

Noun

 * , a passerine bird of South America
 * 1) earwig any of various insects of the order
 * 1) earwig any of various insects of the order

title: tesourinha


text: راعي

title: راعي


text:
Januarius

Adjective

 * : of January

Noun

 * : January

title: Januarius


text:
Talk:فرندا

.
whoops, this is my fault. I mis-typed the word but now I can't figure out how to delete the page. Can someone do that for me? thanks
 * ✅. You can use . — Ungoliant (falai) 22:32, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:فرندا


text:
فارندة

Etymology
From.

title: فارندة


text:
cerwyn

Etymology
From, from , borrowed from , from.

Noun

 * 1) vat large tub

title: cerwyn


text:
disgwyl

Verb

 * 1) to expect
 * 2) to wait
 * 3)  to look
 * 1)  to look

title: disgwyl


text:
Template:U:ar:-in

The final vowel lengthens when there is no tanween: The construct form of this word is and the definite form is.

title: Template:U:ar:-in


text:
گوگولی مگولی

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1)  sweet, cute

Noun

 * 1)  little one, little darling, sweetie, coochy coo

title: گوگولی مگولی


text:
fraternal birth order effect

Noun

 * 1) The scientific observation that a man's statistical probability of being homosexual increases with the number of older brothers he has.

title: fraternal birth order effect


text:
iwrch

Etymology
From, from , from , from (compare 🇨🇬).

Noun

 * 1) roe deer

title: iwrch


text: Category:cy:Cervids

title: Category:cy:Cervids


text: گوگولی مگولی‌ها

title: گوگولی مگولی‌ها


text:
salpeter

Etymology
From, from.

Noun

 * 1)  (UK),  (US).

Noun

 * 1)  (UK),  (US)

Etymology
From and, via.

Noun

 * 1) saltpetre, saltpeter (US), or potassium nitrate

Etymology
From and, via.

Noun

 * 1) saltpetre, saltpeter (US), or potassium nitrate

title: salpeter


text:
roetpiet

Etymology
Equivalent to.

Used as a politically correct alternative for, following societal discussions in the Low Countries on the origin of the face hue of Zwarte Piet, the servant of. Some suggest he gained his face colour whilst climbing sooty chimneys at night, which he does once a year to deliver presents to children. Others suggest that he is an African slave-servant from the colonial era, serving Sinterklaas, his white master.

Noun

 * 1) black pete

Usage notes
When used without a capital letter, the word means "one of the servants of Sinterklaas". When used with a capital letter, the word means "the servant of Sinterklaas".

title: roetpiet


text: tesourinhas

title: tesourinhas


text:
ambivalenta

Adjective

 * 1)  ambivalent

title: ambivalenta


text:
yeyawa

Adverb

 * 1) late night middle of the night, deep of the night, wee hours
 * Taaa ka toneju oukaka, ejeikepei kawoka. Ejekewi kawoka yeyawa. Ninye neke nojeike kawoka uma pa kai – toneju wiu whun.
 * Well, long ago there was a woman [who] played the [sacred] flute. She played the [sacred] flute in the deep of night [under cover of darkness]. "I'm going to play the flute now," is exactly what that woman said.
 * Umejo iyawi, iya kwakwoho onakuwi. Punupa kali, yuutapai ninyu wi? uma pa kai.... Ehn, ninyu apakatapai yiuwi. Nejo kala awatanatapai yeyawa han. Awatanata yeyawa ninyu, muinyakatama. Aitsa yuutapai hyan? uma. Hain? Nejokuma kalano? umakonapai ipitsi.
 * Her husband went, [he] went into the men's house. "Now see here, do you all know about my wife [what my wife has been up to]?" he surely did say. "Well, my wife is causing [the Flute Spirit] to sing. She's the very one who has been playing the [sacred] flute in the middle of the night. She plays the flute at night, and the dawn merely returns." [She is brazenly playing all through the night until daybreak, without anyone putting a stop to it]. "So you all didn't even know about this?" he said. "What? Could she possibly have been the one [to do such a thing]?" they all said about it.

title: yeyawa


text:
trazabilidad

Noun

 * 1) traceability

title: trazabilidad


text:
ಕಲ್ಲಿನ

Adjective

 * 1) rocky

title: ಕಲ್ಲಿನ


text:
User:Tweenk/test

Temporary page for testing templates

title: User:Tweenk/test


text:
鄉土

Etymology

 * "Hong Kong Discuss Forum"
 * Homophonic pun of, short for its original name.

Noun

 * 1) native soil; one's native land; one's hometown
 * 2) region; area

Synonyms

title: 鄉土


text: 乡土

title: 乡土


text:
sobrefacturación

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) overbilling

title: sobrefacturación


text:
說出

Verb

 * 1) to speak out, to declare (one's view)
 * 2) to disclose
 * 3) to pronounce, to utter

title: 說出


text: 说出

title: 说出


text:
費率

Verb

 * 1) tariff; rate

title: 費率


text: 费率

title: 费率


text:
效應

Noun

 * 1)  effect
 * 2)  effect

title: 效應


text: 效应

title: 效应


text:
記憶體

Noun

 * 1)  memory; storage
 * 2)  flash drive; thumb drive

title: 記憶體


text: 记忆体

title: 记忆体


text: seatmile

title: seatmile


text:
擬定

Verb

 * 1) to draw up; to draft; to formulate

Adjective

 * 1)  proposed; tentative; projected; pre-decided

title: 擬定


text: 拟定

title: 拟定


text:
seat-mile

Noun

 * 1)  A unit of measure of passenger carrying capacity, equal to the number of seats available multiplied by the number of miles flown.

title: seat-mile


text: Velvet Revolutions

title: Velvet Revolutions


text:
Mutterschutz

Noun

 * 1) maternity leave

title: Mutterschutz


text: screenshotting

title: screenshotting


text: screenshotted

title: screenshotted


text:
Tagesbetreuung

Noun

 * 1) daycare

title: Tagesbetreuung


text:
werbel

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) snare drum

title: werbel


text:
not worth a Continental

Etymology
From the rapid depreciation of Continental currency, an early American money, and its having become worthless near the end of the American Revolutionary War.

Adjective

 * 1)  worthless, lacking in value, especially due to economic inflation.

title: not worth a Continental


text:
Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2014-11/Require third-party closures of RfD discussions

Require third-party closures of RfD discussions

 * Voting on: At present, it is perfectly acceptable for someone to close an RfD they started or that they voted in. I believe that this is a conflict of interest and that deletion and verification discussions should be closed by an uninvolved editor (who need not be an administrator if the consensus is anything but deletion of an entire entry).  Some would say our community is not large enough for this, but I would respectfully disagree.  Speedy deletions would be exempt from this. Pur ple back pack 89   00:35, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

I propose to change the text of the head of RfD to read as (new text in bold italic):
 * Closing a request: A request can be closed by an uninvolved editor when a decision to delete, keep, or transwiki has been reached, or after the request has expired.

 * Vote starts: 00:01, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Vote ends: 23:59, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

 * Vote created: Pur ple back pack 89  00:35, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Discussion:
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] Beer parlour/2014/November
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] User talk:Purplebackpack89
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2014-11/Require third-party closures of RfD and RfV discussions

Support

 * 1)  as nom Pur ple back pack 89   16:00, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
 * 2)  Ivan Štambuk (talk) 21:48, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
 * 3)  This is the policy for closing article deletion discussions on Wikipedia. I don't see why we should do things differently. The smaller size of our editor pool does not justify dispensing with such a basic principle as striving to avoid conflicts of interest. Fairness and transparency outweigh convenience. Also note that the proposal only holds that the closer not be someone who "started" or "voted in" the RfD. I don't see a problem with closing admins commenting in RfD discussions - e.g. giving information or views for others to consider — but not with them being actively involved in shaping the outcome of the discussion. -Cloudcuckoolander (talk) 01:30, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
 * An editor abstaining from posting a boldfaced vote is not guaranteed to have no stance or bias. Under the proposed regime, it would be advantageous to not post anything, and have a final say when closing the nomination. There are no "conflicts of interest" in RFD in the sense of business administration and government; people cannot buy shares in words, collect dividents per word per year, and thereby have an objectively existing benefit deriving from keeping the words. Even if such conflicts of interest existed, the proposed regime would do nothing to limit their harmful influence. --Dan Polansky (talk) 20:28, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
 * 1)  in principle. Donnanz (talk) 13:46, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
 * 2)  We have enough participants to allow this. DCDuring TALK  18:20, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
 * There are enough RFD participants, but few editors actually help to close RFDs. I know of an editor who posts a lot of RFD nominations but almost never closes any. By contrast, bd2412 does not post many nominations but does a lot of work in closing them. It seems not very nice to punish bd2412 for helping with the key bottleneck action of the process--closing--by preventing him from boldface voting. --Dan Polansky (talk) 18:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Actually the wording is "uninvolved editor" — which probably means they should not even participate in the discussion proper. And I disagree even about there being enough RFD participants. (Also: since I was curious who it is that you might be referring to, I compiled a list of most frequent RFD initiators. Counting closures will be harder, unfortunately.) — Keφr 20:14, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Whether it's possible and whether it's desirable are two different things. Renard Migrant (talk) 20:54, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Could you disambiguate "it"? — Keφr 22:32, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Whether it's possible to have uninvolved closes and whether it's desirable to have uninvolved closes are two different things.Pur ple back pack 89  16:32, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Strong oppose, for the following reason.
 * 2) A small number of editors do most of the RfD closures. I happen to be one of them. Discussions tend to linger for many, many months before someone gets around to closing them, and putting additional restrictions on closure would eliminate some of the more active participants in the page from keeping it reasonable. To my knowledge, no one has ever suggested that I have closed a discussion incorrectly due to a bias derived from my involvement in the discussion. To the contrary, I have frequently closed discussions wherein I have participated, and where the closure went against my expressed preference. In fact, I am not familiar with a situation where any editor has been claimed of making a closure biased by their own participation in the discussion.
 * 3) As has been pointed out elsewhere, under such a rule, potential closers who do have a personal preference for an outcome may merely avoid participating in the relevant discussion so that they will be free to close it as they prefer.
 * 4) Our discussions (and their closures) are completely public and transparent, and our rules require that a closed discussion be left on the page for a week following the closure. There is, therefore, ample time for an objection to be raised following the close of a discussion, if concerns about closer bias need to be aired.
 * 5) Though we do have some contentious discussions, many of our discussions overwhelmingly favor one side. If there is a discussion where a half dozen editors have voted to delete an entry, and only one has voted to keep it, then it shouldn't matter who is closing the discussion in favor of the overwhelming majority. bd2412 T 19:05, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
 * 6)  per bd2412. Let me take this opportunity to thank bd2412 for his job of closing RFD nominations and helping make the RFD page so much smaller. I encourage editors to close even their own nominations, and do so fairly, with view on the principle of consensus and our common RFD practice. --Dan Polansky (talk) 00:46, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
 * 7)  —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 05:32, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
 * 8) . This will just worsen the piling-up of unclosed RFDs. — Ungoliant (falai) 17:43, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
 * 9)  --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 01:31, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
 * 10)  basically per BD. Equinox ◑ 01:33, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
 * 11) Oppose pretty much per what DP said under Cloudcuckoolander's vote. — Keφr 21:50, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
 * 12)  If it ain't broke don't fix it. --Fsojic (talk) 21:56, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
 * , I'd oppose if nothing else for the poor drafting. What's an 'uninvolved editor'? Also transwiki is not a valid outcome of an RFD debate. BD2412 covers everything else, see above. Renard Migrant (talk) 20:39, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
 * An uninvolved editor is one who didn't start or vote in the deletion discussion. It said that in the head. Pur ple back pack 89   16:29, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
 * But not in the proposed change to the page intro. — Keφr 17:31, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Also policies are on their way out. If this passed, we could still ignore it by consensus. Renard Migrant (talk) 15:06, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
 * I think it's wrong to interpret the impending failure of your vote as an indictment of all policy. What the failure of your vote means is that people are not comfortable with CFI having to be followed 100% of the time.  That may mean that they are not comfortable with CFI being policy, but it could still be a guideline (AKA a policy that's allowed to be ignored from time to time by consensus). Pur ple back pack 89   17:49, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Decision

 * Fails 5:9:0 (support:oppose:abstain). --Dan Polansky (talk) 11:37, 4 January 2015 (UTC)


text:
chuffing hell

Interjection

 * 1) A minced oath, an expression of dismay, disgust, anger, surprise etc.
 * Chuffin' hell! What were that?!
 * What the chuffin' hell are yer doin' 'ere?
 * What the chuffin' hell are yer doin' 'ere?

Usage notes
Less vulgar than fucking hell, or even bloody hell, more vulgar than chuffing heck.

title: chuffing hell


text:
Omanize

Verb

 * 1) To make Omani

title: Omanize


text: Omanizes

title: Omanizes


text: Omanizing

title: Omanizing


text: Omanized

title: Omanized


text: Omanise

title: Omanise


text: Omanises

title: Omanises


text: Omanising

title: Omanising


text: Omanised

title: Omanised


text: Category:gd:Photography

title: Category:gd:Photography


text:
宜蘭

Etymology
With 1875 renaming from Komalan Subprefecture (噶瑪蘭廳), from,  or , names given to sites of the Kavalan tribe of Taiwanese aborigines.

title: 宜蘭


text: 宜兰

title: 宜兰


text:
義大利

Etymology
Borrowed from. Attested as early as 1837, in the .

title: 義大利


text: 义大利

title: 义大利


text: Category:Verbs by inflection type by language


text: Category:Adjectives by inflection type by language


text: Category:Lule Sami verbs

title: Category:Lule Sami verbs


text: Category:Latin terms derived from Anatolian languages


text: Category:Aromanian terms derived from Anatolian languages


text: Category:Middle French terms suffixed with -on


text: Category:Finnish terms derived from Anatolian languages


text: Category:Dutch terms derived from Anatolian languages


text: Category:nn:Jewelry

title: Category:nn:Jewelry


text: Category:Manx terms with historical senses


text: Category:Danish terms derived from Anatolian languages


text: Category:nds:Metallurgy

title: Category:nds:Metallurgy


text:
燈光

Noun

 * 1) lamplight; electric light
 * 2) lighting equipment
 * 1) lighting equipment
 * 1) lighting equipment

title: 燈光


text:
灯光

Noun

 * 1) lamplight, electric light

title: 灯光


text: Category:Polish terms prefixed with na-

title: Category:Polish terms prefixed with na-


text: Category:Dalmatian terms derived from Anatolian languages


text:
Canadianization

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) The process of making or becoming Canadian or more Canadian.

Translations

 * Dutch: Canadianisatie
 * Esperanto: kanadigo
 * French:
 * German: Kanadisierung
 * Italian: canadizzazione

title: Canadianization


text: Category:nb:Jewelry

title: Category:nb:Jewelry


text: Category:Old High German terms derived from Vulgar Latin


text: Canadianizations

title: Canadianizations


text:
등광

Noun

 * 1) lamplight

title: 등광


text: Category:na:Mammals

title: Category:na:Mammals


text: Category:Spanish terms derived from Anatolian languages


text: Category:Italian terms derived from Anatolian languages


text: Category:Estonian terms with historical senses


text: Category:na:Dogs

title: Category:na:Dogs


text: Category:Southern Sami verbs

title: Category:Southern Sami verbs


text: Category:Old French terms derived from Anatolian languages


text: Category:Istriot terms derived from Anatolian languages


text: Category:Catalan terms derived from Anatolian languages


text: Category:Norwegian Nynorsk terms derived from Vulgar Latin


text: Category:Latin autological terms

title: Category:Latin autological terms


text: Category:Greek terms prefixed with κιλο-


text: Category:Bulgarian terms derived from Vulgar Latin


text: Category:ja:Radiation

title: Category:ja:Radiation


text: Category:Norwegian Nynorsk terms derived from Anatolian languages


text: Category:Khmer terms with historical senses


text: Category:ja:Nuclear physics

title: Category:ja:Nuclear physics


text: Category:Norwegian Bokmål terms derived from Vulgar Latin


text: Category:Norman terms derived from Anatolian languages


text: Category:Norwegian Bokmål terms derived from Anatolian languages


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 鱧

title: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 鱧


text: Category:Galician terms prefixed with entre-


text: Category:fa:Hearing

title: Category:fa:Hearing


text: Category:Russian terms derived from Anatolian languages


text: Category:Northern Sami verb forms

title: Category:Northern Sami verb forms


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 鱝

title: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 鱝


text: Category:Galician terms derived from Anatolian languages


text: Category:Asturian terms derived from Anatolian languages


text: Category:Romansch terms derived from Anatolian languages


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 鰊

title: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 鰊


text: Category:Friulian terms derived from Anatolian languages


text:
訴求

Verb

 * 1) to appeal; to demand (an answer)

Noun

 * 1) requirement; demand; claim; appeal; (marketing) message

Noun

 * 1) appeal; solicitation

title: 訴求


text: 诉求

title: 诉求


text: Category:Arabic renderings of foreign personal names


text: Category:Quechua terms suffixed with -ntin


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 鯒

title: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 鯒


text: Category:ar:Painting

title: Category:ar:Painting


text: Category:Eastern Min prepositions

title: Category:Eastern Min prepositions


text: Category:French terms derived from Anatolian languages


text: Category:Proto-Samic verbs

title: Category:Proto-Samic verbs


text: Category:Dutch terms derived from substrate languages


text:
Syrianize

Verb

 * 1)  To render something or someone Syrian.
 * 2)  To Balkanize.

title: Syrianize


text:
傳來

Verb

 * 1) to arrive ; to come through; to be heard

title: 傳來


text: 传来

title: 传来


text: Syrianizes

title: Syrianizes


text: Syrianizing

title: Syrianizing


text:
Citations:Goulddigger

Noun: "(slang) a fan of the English singer-songwriter Ellie Goulding"

 * 2014, Jamie Lincoln, "Ellie Goulding + halcyon days", Source, Issue 20, March 2014, page 71:
 * Still, despite her newfound fame, the siren songstress still wants to feel on the same level as the “Goulddiggers” who listen to her music.
 * 2014, Chew Hui Ling, "The Big Deal About Ellie", Teenage, Issue 306, June 2014, page 59:
 * If you're a Goulddigger, you can always count on Ellie to do you justice.

title: Citations:Goulddigger


text: Syrianized

title: Syrianized


text:
屏東

Etymology
From  in 1920, referring to its relative position to.

title: 屏東


text: 屏东

title: 屏东


text:
Californianize

Verb

 * 1)  To render or become Californian.

Translations

 * Esperanto: kaliforniigi
 * French:

title: Californianize


text: Californianizes

title: Californianizes


text: Californianizing

title: Californianizing


text: Californianized

title: Californianized


text:
來得

Verb

 * 1) can do; to be equal (to a task)
 * 2) to emerge from, to come out as

Adverb

 * 1)  extremely; very; highly

title: 來得


text: 来得

title: 来得


text:
錦標賽

Noun

 * 1) championship contest; championship; tournament

title: 錦標賽


text: 锦标赛

title: 锦标赛


text:
錦標

Noun

 * 1)  banner made from brocade (awarded to winners of boat races during Tang dynasty)
 * 2) prize; trophy; title; crown

title: 錦標


text: 锦标

title: 锦标


text:
subfacturación

Noun

 * 1) underbilling

title: subfacturación


text:
Californianization

Noun

 * 1) The process of Californianizing.

title: Californianization


text:
Texasize

Verb

 * 1)  To render Texan.

title: Texasize


text: Texasizes

title: Texasizes


text: Texasizing

title: Texasizing


text: Texasized

title: Texasized


text:
Citations:accentus acutus

 * 1244–5,, De fallaciis, chapter ix: “De fallacia accentus”:
 * Sequitur de fallacia accentus. Accentus autem, secundum quod hic sumitur, est modus pronuntiandi aliquam dictionem. Fallacia autem accentus est deceptio proveniens ex eo quod aliqua dictio diversimode pronunciata diversa significat. Sicut enim fallacia secundum compositionem et divisionem est eadem oratio materialiter, diversificata secundum formam; ita hic est eadem dictio materialiter, diversificata secundum diversum modum pronuntiandi: et ideo sicut ibi est potentialis multiplicitas orationis, ita est hic potentialis multiplicitas dictionis. Causa apparentiae huius fallaciae est materialis unitas dictionis; causa non existentiae est diversitas significationis sive dictionis diversimode pronuntiatae. Sunt autem quatuor modi huius fallaciae, secundum quod quatuor modis contingit diversificari modos pronuntiandi dictionem. Primo namque variatur per diversos sonos sive accentus, qui sunt tres: scilicet accentus gravis, acutus et circumflexus. Accentus acutus, sive sonus, est qui acuit sive elevat syllabam, sicut patet in media syllaba cum dicitur Martinus, media syllaba acuitur sive elevatur. Gravis autem accentus est qui deprimit syllabam et deponit, sicut patet in media huius dictionis dominus et ultima syllaba huius dictionis Lucas. Circumflexus vero accentus est qui acuit syllabam, et postea deprimit, ut Roma. Primus ergo modus huius fallaciae est qui provenit ex eo quod aliqua dictio potest pronuntiari gravi accentu, vel acuto, vel circumflexo. Acuto, ut patet in hoc paralogismo: quoscumque iustum est pendere, iustum est pati poenam. Sed bonos viros iustum est pendere. Ergo bonos viros iustum est pati poenam. Non sequitur: quia in prima pendere sumebatur prout fertur acuto accentu; in secunda ut fertur gravi, et sic idem est pendere, quod donare poenam. Secundo modo variatur modus pronuntiandi accentus secundum diversa tempora, quae sunt duo: scilicet productio in syllaba longa, et correptio in syllaba brevi. Secundus quidem provenit ex eo quod aliqua syllaba alicuius dictionis potest corripi vel produci, ut patet in hoc paralogismo: omnis populus est arbor. Sed aliqua gens est populus; igitur aliqua gens est arbor. Non valet: quia haec dictio populus aliud significat secundum quod prima syllaba eius producitur, quia sic significat arborem quamdam; et aliud secundum quod corripitur, quia sic significat gentem. Tertio modo variatur modus pronuntiandi dictionem secundum diversitatem spiritus, qui quidem diversificatur secundum asperum vel lene: asper quidem spiritus designatur per hanc figuram h, lenis vero spiritus est quando sine aspiratione syllaba profertur. Tertius modus huius fallaciae provenit ex eo quod syllaba potest leniter vel aspere proferri, ut patet in hoc paralogismo: quicquid hamatur, hamo capitur. Sed vinum amatur: igitur vinum capitur. Non valet: quia primo hamatur profertur aspere, postea leniter. Similiter hic: omnis ara est in templo. Stabulum porcorum est hara: igitur stabulum porcorum est in templo. Non sequitur: quia hoc nomen ara primo profertur leniter, postea aspere. Quartus modus provenit ex eo quod aliquid potest proferri ut una dictio vel plures, ut hic: tu es qui es. Sed quies idem est quod requies. Ergo tu es requies. Non sequitur: quia haec dictio qui es primo sumitur ut oratio, postea ut dictio una. Similiter hic: quicquid Deus fecit invite, fecit invitus. Sed racemos fecit in vite: igitur racemos fecit invitus. Non sequitur: quia primo haec dictio invite sumitur ut una dictio, postea ut plures. Patet ergo ex praedictis quod accentus denominatus secundum quod ab eo denominatur haec fallacia, communior est quam accentus qui dividitur per gravem et acutum et circumflexum, quia comprehendit sub se et hunc accentum, et alios tres, ut dictum est.

title: Citations:accentus acutus


text:
agaill

Etymology 1
Possibly derived from ?

Noun

 * 1) earthworm
 * 2) cantankerous person
 * 1) cantankerous person

Declension

 * Alternative plural:

Etymology 2
From.

Verb

 * 1)  address, speak to, converse with
 * 2)  interview

title: agaill


text:
Citations:accentus gravis

 * 1244–5,, De fallaciis, chapter ix: “De fallacia accentus”:
 * Sequitur de fallacia accentus. Accentus autem, secundum quod hic sumitur, est modus pronuntiandi aliquam dictionem. Fallacia autem accentus est deceptio proveniens ex eo quod aliqua dictio diversimode pronunciata diversa significat. Sicut enim fallacia secundum compositionem et divisionem est eadem oratio materialiter, diversificata secundum formam; ita hic est eadem dictio materialiter, diversificata secundum diversum modum pronuntiandi: et ideo sicut ibi est potentialis multiplicitas orationis, ita est hic potentialis multiplicitas dictionis. Causa apparentiae huius fallaciae est materialis unitas dictionis; causa non existentiae est diversitas significationis sive dictionis diversimode pronuntiatae. Sunt autem quatuor modi huius fallaciae, secundum quod quatuor modis contingit diversificari modos pronuntiandi dictionem. Primo namque variatur per diversos sonos sive accentus, qui sunt tres: scilicet accentus gravis, acutus et circumflexus. Accentus acutus, sive sonus, est qui acuit sive elevat syllabam, sicut patet in media syllaba cum dicitur Martinus, media syllaba acuitur sive elevatur. Gravis autem accentus est qui deprimit syllabam et deponit, sicut patet in media huius dictionis dominus et ultima syllaba huius dictionis Lucas. Circumflexus vero accentus est qui acuit syllabam, et postea deprimit, ut Roma. Primus ergo modus huius fallaciae est qui provenit ex eo quod aliqua dictio potest pronuntiari gravi accentu, vel acuto, vel circumflexo. Acuto, ut patet in hoc paralogismo: quoscumque iustum est pendere, iustum est pati poenam. Sed bonos viros iustum est pendere. Ergo bonos viros iustum est pati poenam. Non sequitur: quia in prima pendere sumebatur prout fertur acuto accentu; in secunda ut fertur gravi, et sic idem est pendere, quod donare poenam. Secundo modo variatur modus pronuntiandi accentus secundum diversa tempora, quae sunt duo: scilicet productio in syllaba longa, et correptio in syllaba brevi. Secundus quidem provenit ex eo quod aliqua syllaba alicuius dictionis potest corripi vel produci, ut patet in hoc paralogismo: omnis populus est arbor. Sed aliqua gens est populus; igitur aliqua gens est arbor. Non valet: quia haec dictio populus aliud significat secundum quod prima syllaba eius producitur, quia sic significat arborem quamdam; et aliud secundum quod corripitur, quia sic significat gentem. Tertio modo variatur modus pronuntiandi dictionem secundum diversitatem spiritus, qui quidem diversificatur secundum asperum vel lene: asper quidem spiritus designatur per hanc figuram h, lenis vero spiritus est quando sine aspiratione syllaba profertur. Tertius modus huius fallaciae provenit ex eo quod syllaba potest leniter vel aspere proferri, ut patet in hoc paralogismo: quicquid hamatur, hamo capitur. Sed vinum amatur: igitur vinum capitur. Non valet: quia primo hamatur profertur aspere, postea leniter. Similiter hic: omnis ara est in templo. Stabulum porcorum est hara: igitur stabulum porcorum est in templo. Non sequitur: quia hoc nomen ara primo profertur leniter, postea aspere. Quartus modus provenit ex eo quod aliquid potest proferri ut una dictio vel plures, ut hic: tu es qui es. Sed quies idem est quod requies. Ergo tu es requies. Non sequitur: quia haec dictio qui es primo sumitur ut oratio, postea ut dictio una. Similiter hic: quicquid Deus fecit invite, fecit invitus. Sed racemos fecit in vite: igitur racemos fecit invitus. Non sequitur: quia primo haec dictio invite sumitur ut una dictio, postea ut plures. Patet ergo ex praedictis quod accentus denominatus secundum quod ab eo denominatur haec fallacia, communior est quam accentus qui dividitur per gravem et acutum et circumflexum, quia comprehendit sub se et hunc accentum, et alios tres, ut dictum est.

title: Citations:accentus gravis


text:
Alaskanize

Verb

 * 1) To make Alaskan

Translations

 * Esperanto: alaskigi

title: Alaskanize


text: Alaskanizes

title: Alaskanizes


text: Alaskanizing

title: Alaskanizing


text:
Citations:accentus circumflexus

 * 1244–5,, De fallaciis, chapter ix: “De fallacia accentus”:
 * Sequitur de fallacia accentus. Accentus autem, secundum quod hic sumitur, est modus pronuntiandi aliquam dictionem. Fallacia autem accentus est deceptio proveniens ex eo quod aliqua dictio diversimode pronunciata diversa significat. Sicut enim fallacia secundum compositionem et divisionem est eadem oratio materialiter, diversificata secundum formam; ita hic est eadem dictio materialiter, diversificata secundum diversum modum pronuntiandi: et ideo sicut ibi est potentialis multiplicitas orationis, ita est hic potentialis multiplicitas dictionis. Causa apparentiae huius fallaciae est materialis unitas dictionis; causa non existentiae est diversitas significationis sive dictionis diversimode pronuntiatae. Sunt autem quatuor modi huius fallaciae, secundum quod quatuor modis contingit diversificari modos pronuntiandi dictionem. Primo namque variatur per diversos sonos sive accentus, qui sunt tres: scilicet accentus gravis, acutus et circumflexus. Accentus acutus, sive sonus, est qui acuit sive elevat syllabam, sicut patet in media syllaba cum dicitur Martinus, media syllaba acuitur sive elevatur. Gravis autem accentus est qui deprimit syllabam et deponit, sicut patet in media huius dictionis dominus et ultima syllaba huius dictionis Lucas. Circumflexus vero accentus est qui acuit syllabam, et postea deprimit, ut Roma. Primus ergo modus huius fallaciae est qui provenit ex eo quod aliqua dictio potest pronuntiari gravi accentu, vel acuto, vel circumflexo. Acuto, ut patet in hoc paralogismo: quoscumque iustum est pendere, iustum est pati poenam. Sed bonos viros iustum est pendere. Ergo bonos viros iustum est pati poenam. Non sequitur: quia in prima pendere sumebatur prout fertur acuto accentu; in secunda ut fertur gravi, et sic idem est pendere, quod donare poenam. Secundo modo variatur modus pronuntiandi accentus secundum diversa tempora, quae sunt duo: scilicet productio in syllaba longa, et correptio in syllaba brevi. Secundus quidem provenit ex eo quod aliqua syllaba alicuius dictionis potest corripi vel produci, ut patet in hoc paralogismo: omnis populus est arbor. Sed aliqua gens est populus; igitur aliqua gens est arbor. Non valet: quia haec dictio populus aliud significat secundum quod prima syllaba eius producitur, quia sic significat arborem quamdam; et aliud secundum quod corripitur, quia sic significat gentem. Tertio modo variatur modus pronuntiandi dictionem secundum diversitatem spiritus, qui quidem diversificatur secundum asperum vel lene: asper quidem spiritus designatur per hanc figuram h, lenis vero spiritus est quando sine aspiratione syllaba profertur. Tertius modus huius fallaciae provenit ex eo quod syllaba potest leniter vel aspere proferri, ut patet in hoc paralogismo: quicquid hamatur, hamo capitur. Sed vinum amatur: igitur vinum capitur. Non valet: quia primo hamatur profertur aspere, postea leniter. Similiter hic: omnis ara est in templo. Stabulum porcorum est hara: igitur stabulum porcorum est in templo. Non sequitur: quia hoc nomen ara primo profertur leniter, postea aspere. Quartus modus provenit ex eo quod aliquid potest proferri ut una dictio vel plures, ut hic: tu es qui es. Sed quies idem est quod requies. Ergo tu es requies. Non sequitur: quia haec dictio qui es primo sumitur ut oratio, postea ut dictio una. Similiter hic: quicquid Deus fecit invite, fecit invitus. Sed racemos fecit in vite: igitur racemos fecit invitus. Non sequitur: quia primo haec dictio invite sumitur ut una dictio, postea ut plures. Patet ergo ex praedictis quod accentus denominatus secundum quod ab eo denominatur haec fallacia, communior est quam accentus qui dividitur per gravem et acutum et circumflexum, quia comprehendit sub se et hunc accentum, et alios tres, ut dictum est.

title: Citations:accentus circumflexus


text:
minyulitai

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) absolutely untrue, nothing but a lie, an untruth
 * Paintyawi ojopai. Payuwatuapai ipitsi. Minyuli! Minyulitai! Aitsa yajo itsapai!
 * [Mother speaking to her adolescent daughter:] You probably had sex with him. [It's obvious that] you're crazy about him.
 * [Daughter:] That's a lie! Just a lie! It's not like that at all!
 * 1) ruse, deception, stratagem, pretense, trickery, bluff, treachery
 * Minyulitai tumapai. Emetsuatai kehoto.
 * It was just deception that they built it [they weren't really just building a village]. They were stealing the land.
 * [Wauja elder recounting how a neighboring community tried to encroach on Wauja land.]
 * [Itsautaku:] Yamukunaun aya autukene mapa. Atukutapai yamukunauntope. Iya tukene mapa. Hoona, ayiu! Pa, yamukunaun iya itsenu wi. Tika tika tika ... minyulitai! [Mukura:] Amamitsatai? [Itsautaku:] Ehen, amamitsatai. Minyulitai. Amamitsapai. Maka onuko. Maka akiyuntuapa. Tika tika tik ... itsenu yamukunaun. Yamukunaun, aitsa uutapai. Aitsa uutapai okaintsityu han.
 * [Itsautaku, elder, telling traditional story:] "Children, let's collect [wild] honey!" [She] invited all the children [of the village to come along]. [They] were going to collect honey. "All right, let's go!" [they said]. Well, all the children went with [the woman and her husband]. [The patter of their running feet was heard on the path:] tika tika tika. But [the seemingly light-hearted outing] was just a ploy! [It was just part of the plan.] [Itsautaku's daughter, Mukura, interjects:] [So she] was simply tricking [her husband]? [Itsautaku resumes:] Yes, [she] was just tricking [him]. [It] was just a lie. [She] was deceiving [him]. So that [she] could kill [him]. So that [she] could get [her] revenge. Tika tika tika [went the patter of the children's feet]. [The] children who had accompanied [them]. [The] children did not know. [They] did not know what [the woman] was planning.
 * 1) pretense, formality, dissemblance, dissimulation, evasion oblique, indirect, or formally modest manner of speaking
 * "Nana autehene aitsu han, auleinyeintsakula waitsa," umapai... Putakanaku ipitsi umapai... Punubapai fazenda, kata ahapwonatain fazenda, aitsa inyaun wakapai onain, ipitsi umapai. Aitsaha -- minyulitai, putakanaku. Ipitsi umapai. Amaunaun hata ogatakoja.
 * [Acknowledging ceremonial guests from another village, a Wauja chief formally orates:] "These ones indeed have come searching for us, [here in] our abandoned fallow manioc gardens." [The chief] is referring to the village. See, a summer manioc garden is just a little [encampment], there's nobody living there, that's what he's saying. But no, it's not true, [the village to which his guests have come is actually a] large village [and not a humble encampment]. He's just saying that. It's merely a chief's way of speaking [with formal modesty].
 * "Nana tua autehene aitsu han, tya," umawi, paisejo ipitsi. "Hain, tya. Aitsa kala natu ya, tya." …Aitsa nikiyejepei ipitsi umapai. Minyulitai. Ogatakoja hata.
 * "These ones indeed have come searching for us," [the chief] said to his younger brother [formally announcing ceremonial guests from another village]. "Ah. Certainly not me," [said the younger chief]. He was saying he was unworthy, unskilled at oratory. But it was not true. It was just a manner of speaking.

Verb

 * 1)  he/she/it only or habitually lies
 * 2)  he/she/it errs, misspeaks, is mistaken
 * Mepiauwan itsupalu sekunya. Ehn! Niminyulitai. Pauwan hatiu. Opawa aitsa neke kakawakawiu.
 * She had two daughters in those days. Ah! I misspoke. She had only one. The other wasn't born yet.
 * Nupoponapai. Niminyulitai nanatapai.
 * I am making mistakes. I am messing up as I write.
 * I am making mistakes. I am messing up as I write.

title: minyulitai


text:
Alaskanization

Noun

 * 1) The process of Alaskanizing

title: Alaskanization


text:
Texasization

Noun

 * 1) The process of Texasizing.

title: Texasization


text: celajes

title: celajes


text:
Module:se-common

local export = {}

local vowels_simp = { ["ea"] = "ē", ["ie"] = "ī", ["oa"] = "ō", ["uo"] = "ū" }

local langdata = { consonant = { "^(.-[aạáeẹēiīoọōuūyAẠÁEẸĒIĪOỌŌUŪY])([iI][^aáeēiīoōuūyAÁEĒIĪOŌUŪY{}-]*)$", "^(.-)([^aạáeẹēiīoọōuūyAẠÁEẸĒIĪOỌŌUŪY{}-]*)$", },	vowel = { "^(.-)(uo)$", "^(.-)(oa)$", "^(.-)(ea)$", "^(.-)(ie)$", "^(.-)([aạáeẹēiīoọōuūyAẠÁEẸĒIĪOỌŌUŪY]?)$", },	scons = { [1] = {			{"^[dhp]$"}, },		[2] = {			{"^dj$", "j", "ddj"}, {"^([đflmnŋrsšŧv])%1$", "%1", "%1ˈ%1"}, {"^hc$", "z", "hcc"}, {"^hč$", "ž", "hčč"}, {"^hk$", "g", "hkk"}, {"^hp$", "b", "hpp"}, {"^ht$", "đ", "htt"}, {"^h([jlmnr])%1$", "h%1", "h%1ˈ%1"}, {"^kŋ$", "ŋ", "gŋ"}, {"^pm$", "m", "bm"}, {"^tn(j?)$", "n%1", "dn%1"}, {"^nnj$", "nj", "nˈnj"}, },		[3] = {			{"^bb$", "pp"}, {"^dd$", "tt"}, {"^gg$", "kk"}, {"^zz$", "cc"}, {"^žž$", "čč"}, {"^llj$", "lj"}, -- Clusters {"^lˈj$", "ljj"}, {"^rbm$", "rpm"}, {"^rdn$", "rtn"}, {"^rdnj$", "rtnj"}, {"^rgŋ$", "rkŋ"}, {"^k(.*)(.)$", "v%1%2%2"}, {"([^r])bm$", "%1mm"}, {"([^r])dn(j?)$", "%1nn%2"}, {"([^r])gŋ$", "%1ŋŋ"}, {"^(đ)([bgjv])$", "%1%2%2"}, {"^(i)([bcdgklprstv])$", "%1%2%2"}, {"^(ih)([lmn])$", "%1%2%2"}, {"^(is)([kmt])$", "%1%2%2"}, {"^(l)([bcčdfgkpstv])$", "%1%2%2"}, {"^(ls)([t])$", "%1%2%2"}, {"^(m)([bpsš])$", "%1%2%2"}, {"^(n)([cčdsštzž])$", "%1%2%2"}, {"^(ns)([t])$", "%1%2%2"}, {"^(ŋ)([gk])$", "%1%2%2"}, {"^(p)([t])$", "%1%2%2"}, {"^(r)([bcčdfgjkpsštvž])$", "%1%2%2"}, {"^(rs)([kt])$", "%1%2%2"}, {"^(s)([bfkmptv])$", "%1%2%2"}, {"^(š)([kmpt])$", "%1%2%2"}, {"^(t)([km])$", "%1%2%2"}, {"^(v)([dgjklprstzž])$", "%1%2%2"}, {"^(vh)([l])$", "%1%2%2"}, {"^ij$"}, {"^lfr$"}, },	},	to_final = { -- Allowed consonants {"^[lnprsšt]$"}, {"^i[dn]$"}, -- Disallowed consonants {"^([bdgh])$", "t"}, {"^([bdg])%1$", "t"}, {"^h[kpt]$", "t"}, {"^j$", "i"}, {"^m$", "n"}, {"^([sz])$", "s"}, {"^([sz])%1$", "s"}, {"^([šž])$", "š"}, {"^([šž])%1$", "š"}, -- Clusters {"^([lr])[dg]$", "%1"}, {"^([lsš])[kmt]$", "%1"}, },	make_final_if = { "^$",		"^[^aạáeẹēiīoọōuūyAẠÁEẸĒIĪOỌŌUŪY]", },	vowel_variants = { normal       = {                                                                                }, short        = {                                   ["i"] = {"ẹ"}    ,                                    ["u"] = {"ọ"}     }, e            = {                                   ["i"] = {"á"}    ,                ["ọ"] = {"o", "S"}, ["u"] = {"o", "S"}}, e_contr_j    = {["a"] = {"i", "S"}, ["e"] = {"i"}, ["i"] = {"á"}    , ["o"] = {"u"}, ["ọ"] = {"o", "S"}, ["u"] = {"u", "S"}}, i            = {                                   ["i"] = {"e", "S"},                ["ọ"] = {"o", "S"}, ["u"] = {"o", "S"}}, j            = {                    ["e"] = {"i"}, ["i"] = {"i", "S"}, ["o"] = {"u"},                     ["u"] = {"ū"}     }, j_contr      = {["a"] = {"e", "S"},                ["i"] = {"e", "S"},                ["ọ"] = {"o", "S"}, ["u"] = {"o", "S"}}, j_contr_final = {["a"] = {"i"}   ,                                                                                }, pres_12sg    = {                                   ["i"] = {"á"}    ,                                                      }, pres_3sg     = {["a"] = {"á"}    ,                ["i"] = {"á"}     ,                                                      }, impr         = {["a"] = {"o", "S"},                ["i"] = {"o", "S"},                ["ọ"] = {"o", "S"}, ["u"] = {"o", "S"}}, impr_final   = {["a"] = {"u"}    ,                ["i"] = {"u"}     ,                                                      }, contr_noun   = {["a"] = {"á"}    ,                ["i"] = {"á"}     ,                                    ["u"] = {"o", "S"}}, contr_noun_j = {["a"] = {"á"}    ,                ["i"] = {"á"}     , ["o"] = {"u"},                     ["u"] = {"u", "S"}}, },	postprocess = function(form, vowel_effect) if vowel_effect == "S" then form.svowel = vowels_simp[form.svowel] or form.svowel end end, }

export.Stem = require("Module:smi-common").make_constructor(langdata)

return export

title: Module:se-common


text: Module:se-common/documentation

title: Module:se-common/documentation


text:
đứa bé

Etymology
🇰🇲

Noun

 * 1) child

title: đứa bé


text:
đứa trẻ

Noun

 * 1) child

title: đứa trẻ


text:
trẻ

Etymology
From.

Attested in Phật thuyết đại báo phụ mẫu ân trọng kinh (佛說大報父母恩重經) as, composed of +  (modern SV:  ),  (modern SV: ) and  (modern SV: ).

Sometimes connected to  (SV: ) but this can now be rejected based on the  cluster in Old Vietnamese.

Adjective

 * 1)  young

Noun

 * 1)  a

title: trẻ


text:
cincha

Etymology
Ultimately from.

Noun

 * 1) belt

Etymology 1
From (attested since the 13th century), from.

Noun

 * 1) girth

Etymology 1
, syncopated form of. . Cf. also the related.

Noun

 * 1) girth for horses or similar animals
 * 2)  sling

title: cincha


text: cinchas

title: cinchas


text:
cincho

Etymology 1
From ( attested since the 13th century), from.

Noun

 * 1) iron girdle, belt, hoop or clamp

Etymology 1
, through a syncopated form, with palatalization of the 'l'. However, this phonetic evolution for Spanish presents difficulties to some linguists, who prefer a Vulgar Latin form, influenced by , the supine of the related verb (or possibly a derivation from  or  itself). , which were also inherited or came from dialectal variants undergoing different sound changes and slightly different semantic developments; also doublet of, which was a later borrowing.

Noun

 * 1) belt
 * 2) girdle
 * 1) girdle

title: cincho


text: Category:Requests for quotations/Plato

title: Category:Requests for quotations/Plato


text: cinchos

title: cinchos


text: Category:Requests for quotations/Aristotle


text:
перакладчык

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) interpreter
 * 2) translator

title: перакладчык


text:
User:Haykam821

Hello. I am Haykam821.

es:Usuario:Haykam821

title: User:Haykam821


text:
User talk:Haykam821

This is my talk page.

title: User talk:Haykam821


text:
claveque

Noun

 * 1)  paste, strass

title: claveque


text: claveques

title: claveques


text:
перакладчыца

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) female interpreter
 * 2) female translator

title: перакладчыца


text:
codeso

Etymology
From, probably from , from , from. Or else from a language. Cognate with 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Etymology
, from, from.

Noun

 * 1) laburnum

title: codeso


text:
Boingoloid

Noun

 * 1)  A fan of the American rock band.

title: Boingoloid


text: Boingoloids

title: Boingoloids


text:
排場

Noun

 * 1) ostentation; show of extravagance; pomp

Adjective

 * 1) ostentatious; extravagant; showy
 * 2) magnificent; dignified

title: 排場


text: 排场

title: 排场


text:
перакладаць

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to interpret
 * 2) to translate

title: перакладаць


text: definerligt

title: definerligt


text:
kālaimeaola

Noun

 * 1) biology

title: kālaimeaola


text:
kālaimeaolahune

Noun

 * 1) microbiology

title: kālaimeaolahune


text:
kālaikūlohea

Noun

 * 1) physics

title: kālaikūlohea


text: definerlige

title: definerlige


text:
danisere

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to Danicize

title: danisere


text:
danglish

Etymology
Blend of Danish and English.

Noun

 * 1) Danglish

title: danglish


text:
Crimhead

Etymology
Shortened

Noun

 * 1)  A fan of the English rock band.
 * 2) * 1998, Hans Morgenstern, The Nightwatch review, Miami New Times, 7 May 1998:
 * The release of two retrospective, in-concert, four-CD box sets and two separate live compilations (one a double CD, the other a single) might seem a bit excessive -- to non-Crimheads.
 * 1) * 1998, Hans Morgenstern, The Nightwatch review, Miami New Times, 7 May 1998:
 * The release of two retrospective, in-concert, four-CD box sets and two separate live compilations (one a double CD, the other a single) might seem a bit excessive -- to non-Crimheads.

title: Crimhead


text: Crimheads

title: Crimheads


text: danglishs

title: danglishs


text:
Danify

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) To make more.

title: Danify


text: Danifies

title: Danifies


text: Danifying

title: Danifying


text: Danified

title: Danified


text:
Danicize

Etymology
.

Verb

 * 1) To make (more) Danish.

Translations

 * Chinese:
 * Mandarin: 丹麥化
 * Danish: danisere, fordanske
 * Esperanto: danigi
 * Faroese:
 * Finnish: tanskalaistaa
 * French: daniciser
 * German: danisieren, dänisieren
 * Icelandic:
 * Swedish: fördanska, danisera

title: Danicize


text: Danicizes

title: Danicizes


text: Danicizing

title: Danicizing


text: Danicized

title: Danicized


text:
rushaholic

Noun

 * 1)  A person who is constantly in a hurry.

title: rushaholic


text:
Danicise

Etymology
.

title: Danicise


text: rushaholics

title: rushaholics


text: Danicises

title: Danicises


text: Danicising

title: Danicising


text: Danicised

title: Danicised


text:
Danicization

Alternative forms

 * (UK)

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) The act of Danicizing.

title: Danicization


text:
Danicisation

Etymology
From.

title: Danicisation


text:
User talk:Band geek35

Talk to me!!! Think I made a mistake on one if my edits??? Comment below!(Band geek35 (talk) 04:12, 18 November 2014 (UTC))

title: User talk:Band geek35


text:
corpsepaint

Noun

 * 1) A style of black-and-white makeup used primarily by black metal musicians and fans, intended to make the wearer appear inhuman, corpselike, or demonic.

Translations

 * Norwegian: liksminke

title: corpsepaint


text: naashchxǫʼ

title: naashchxǫʼ


text: nanichxǫʼ

title: nanichxǫʼ


text: corpse paint

title: corpse paint


text: nijichxǫʼ

title: nijichxǫʼ


text: neiichxǫʼ

title: neiichxǫʼ


text: naahchxǫʼ

title: naahchxǫʼ


text:
PIR

Noun

 * : a form to be filled in when baggage is lost by an airline.

title: PIR


text:
딸꾹질

Noun

 * 1) hiccuping, hiccups

title: 딸꾹질


text:
딸꾹질하다

Etymology
.

Verb

 * 1)  to hiccup

title: 딸꾹질하다


text: Moslems

title: Moslems


text: Mosleme

title: Mosleme


text:
blobular

Etymology
From. Compare.

Adjective

 * 1) blob-shaped

title: blobular


text:
登場人物

Etymology
Compound of.

Noun

 * 1) character a being in a story

title: 登場人物


text:
beostare

Etymology
From, or just beo, is from , cognate with 🇨🇬. Used in Swedish since 1924 (Brehm, Djurens liv).

Noun

 * 1) common hill myna

title: beostare


text:
χιλιόκυκλος

Noun

 * 1)  kilocycle

title: χιλιόκυκλος


text: Category:Greek terms prefixed with χιλιό-


text: Category:Swedish terms derived from Indonesian


text:
spânzurătoare

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) gallows

title: spânzurătoare


text:
DAE

Phrase

 * DAE think we should post a regular link to the FAQ?
 * DAE think we should post a regular link to the FAQ?

title: DAE


text: パオ

title: パオ


text:
синус

Etymology
Scientific term, ultimately from.

Noun

 * 1)  sine ratio between the length of an opposite side to the length of the hypotenuse in a right-angle triangle
 * 2)  sinus sac or cavity in a tissue or an organ

Etymology
Borrowed from, from.

Noun

 * 1)  sine
 * 2)  sinus

Noun

 * 1)  sine
 * 2)  sinus

Noun

 * 1)  sine
 * 2)  sinus

title: синус


text:
配有

Verb

 * 1) to be equipped with

title: 配有


text: zhuāngbèi

title: zhuāngbèi


text: pèiyǒu

title: pèiyǒu


text:
ادغام

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) amalgamation, coalescence, merge

title: ادغام


text: 钟楼

title: 钟楼


text: 鍾樓

title: 鍾樓


text: zhōnglóu

title: zhōnglóu


text:
مشاجره

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) dispute, quarrel, argument, brannigan

title: مشاجره