text:
Atlanterhavet

Proper noun

 * 1) the Atlantic Ocean

Proper noun

 * 1) the Atlantic Ocean

title: Atlanterhavet


text:
churnover

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) The excessive buying and selling of shares by a stockbroker for a client’s account as a method of generating income from the resulting commissions.

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: churnover


text:
consciousness-raising

Etymology
First known use: 1968.

Noun

 * 1) An increase of concerned awareness, especially of some social or political issue.

title: consciousness-raising


text: Category:nb:Oceans

title: Category:nb:Oceans


text: Category:nn:Oceans

title: Category:nn:Oceans


text:
colopexy

Noun

 * 1)  The attachment of a portion of the colon to the abdominal wall.

title: colopexy


text:
Cotman

Etymology
From, , equivalent to.

title: Cotman


text:
cast down

Etymology
From, , equivalent to.

Verb

 * 1)  To make (a person) discouraged or dejected.
 * 2)  To overthrow, to defeat or bring to ruin.

Translations

 * Gothic: 𐌲𐌰𐌳𐍂𐌰𐌿𐍃𐌾𐌰𐌽

title: cast down


text:
curbsider

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) An unregistered car dealer who sells vehicles from parking lots and other public locations while masquerading as a private seller; a person who sells stolen, rebuilt, or odometer-tampered vehicles.

title: curbsider


text:
docky

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1)  A snack.

title: docky


text: curbsiders

title: curbsiders


text: query languages

title: query languages


text:
dragonize

Etymology
.

Verb

 * 1)  To turn into a dragon.
 * 2)  To guard attentively; to watch over.

title: dragonize


text: choke hold

title: choke hold


text:
ergomorphic

Adjective

 * 1) That changes shape to conform with the body part that is using it.

title: ergomorphic


text:
pesero

Etymology
From earlier, from , from , from , from , from. Reconstructed as.

Noun

 * 1) butcher

Noun

 * 1) minibus

title: pesero


text: peseros

title: peseros


text: pesera

title: pesera


text: peseras

title: peseras


text:
Talk:Thor's beard

These were listed as "references", but they are just mention-y citations:
 * 1994 Teutonic Magic, Kveldulf Gundarson, Llewellyn, ISBN 0-87542-291-8, page 206:
 * Houseleek Also called Thorr’s Beard.
 * 1996 Lina volume 1 issue 4 (US Heathen Journal), A Sunwheel Herb Garden, Alissa Sorenson.
 * Also known as “Thor’s Beard”, Houseleek (Sempervivum tectorum) planted in a pot and placed on the roof will protect a house from lightning.
 * 1999 Talking Stick (Pagan Journal) issue 2 Volume 2, ISSN: 1464-2042, Mjolnir Hammer of Thor, Thorskegga Thorn, page 151.
 * The houseleek is not a native plant and the tradition would have been borrowed from Classical practice, and indeed the plant retains its pagan latin name Jovisbarda (Jupiters Beard) and in some areas of England it is known as Thorsbeard.

title: Talk:Thor's beard


text:
Thread:User talk:CodeCat/User rights

Hi, CodeCat! I noticed that you just revoked my rights as autopatroller. If I may ask, what is the reason for this?

title: Thread:User talk:CodeCat/User rights


text: 原故

title: 原故


text: vannene

title: vannene


text:
篩骨

Noun

 * 1)  ethmoid bone

Etymology
,

Noun

 * 1) an ethmoid bone

title: 篩骨


text:
しこつ

Noun

 * 1)  appendicular bone
 * 2)  phalanx
 * 3)  phalanx (toe bone)
 * 4)  dentary bone
 * 5)  ethmoid bone
 * 6)  rostral bone

title: しこつ


text: shikotsu

title: shikotsu


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 篩

title: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 篩


text: dragonizes

title: dragonizes


text: dragonizing

title: dragonizing


text: dragonized

title: dragonized


text:
Thread:User talk:CodeCat/User rights/reply

I noticed you have been making several edits today that seemed to contain some rather sloppy mistakes. Some examples:
 * ergomorphic had an etymology that didn't make any sense.
 * Same for curbsider, it has nothing at all to do with sider.
 * colopexy has an incorrect IPA pronunciation.
 * arithmogram and arithmography link to an invalid entry arith(metic). And I believe the etymology is and  anyway.
 * arctogaeal has spaces in the IPA which shouldn't be there. And the etymology should be properly formatted and use the appropriate templates. Greek should be Ancient Greek if that's what it is, and should be written in Greek script.
 * allochthon has spaces in the IPA too. There are several more entries where you did this.
 * astrionics links to invalid entries astro(o)- and (electr)onics. And it seems the etymology is off too. IPA has spaces in it.
 * astrologaster's etymology is wrong, the base word is not astrologer.
 * athymia has invalid IPA.

And that's just from your last 50 edits.


text:
高翔

Verb

 * 1)  to fly high

Noun

 * 1) flying high

Verb

 * 1) fly high

title: 高翔


text:
Thread:User talk:CodeCat/User rights/reply (2)

I apologize. Is there any possibility for redemption of autopatrolling rights?


text:
astrionic

Adjective

 * 1) Relating to astrionics.

title: astrionic


text: gin jockey

title: gin jockey


text: gin jockeys

title: gin jockeys


text:
wertrational

Etymology
Borrowed from. Used by.

Adjective

 * 1)  Pursued because of reasons or motives intrinsic to the actor.

title: wertrational


text:
palpiere

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  eyelid

title: palpiere


text:
zweckrationality

Noun

 * 1)  Quality of being zweckrational.

title: zweckrationality


text:
wertrationality

Noun

 * 1)  Quality of being wertrational.

title: wertrationality


text: Stukas

title: Stukas


text:
nagelriem

Noun

 * 1) the strip of hardened skin at the base and sides of a fingernail or toenail; a cuticle

title: nagelriem


text:
seneste

Adjective

 * 1) last
 * de seneste fem årene - the last five years
 * de seneste fem årene - the last five years

title: seneste


text:
Thread:User talk:CodeCat/User rights/reply (3)

Autopatrolling is not a right as such, because it doesn't affect anything a user does. Rather it affects what other users see. It's granted when a user's edits can be trusted to contain no significant number of mistakes, meaning that they no longer need consistent reviewing. I removed autopatrolling for you because the examples above meant that your edits do need reviewing IMO. I could have reviewed and fixed them all myself, but removing autopatrolling would bring it to the attention of other editors as well.

So I would say that it can be activated again if there is some indication that your edits no longer need checking.


text:
anak sundal

Noun

 * 1)  motherfucker. Literally "son of a whore"

Usage notes
Found only in material translated from another language.

title: anak sundal


text:
canail

Etymology
From, cf. 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) * The London Magazine, Or, Gentleman's Monthly Intelligencer (volume 37)
 * in whatever light Mr. Sharp's profession may be looked upon in Italy, yet as he is in this country allowed by a gentleman, it is certainly very impudent in Mr. Baretti to treat him so frequently on English ground with such illiberal language, which, however he informs us is not to be met with in Italy, except amongst the canail.
 * in whatever light Mr. Sharp's profession may be looked upon in Italy, yet as he is in this country allowed by a gentleman, it is certainly very impudent in Mr. Baretti to treat him so frequently on English ground with such illiberal language, which, however he informs us is not to be met with in Italy, except amongst the canail.

title: canail


text: Binner

title: Binner


text:
Talk:buy someone out

RFM discussion: December 2010–August 2014
Merge with buy out. Mglovesfun (talk) 15:36, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

 * Merge. —Ruakh TALK 20:29, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

 * Done --Type56op9 (talk) 18:01, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:buy someone out


text:
Category talk:Lewis Carroll

RFM discussion: December 2010
"This category includes words and phrases coined by Lewis Carroll, or otherwise derived from his works." Shouldn't it be an "English words from..." category, then? —msh210℠ (talk) 06:31, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

title: Category talk:Lewis Carroll


text:
Category talk:Nineteen Eighty-Four

RFM discussion: October 2010
These entries seem to be attestable in English outside the fictional context, so I propose moving them to Category:Nineteen Eighty-Four derivations. --Daniel. 18:36, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, this would fit our current system. Support. Mglovesfun (talk) 20:32, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * System-shmystem. It is more comprehensible, yet brief name. DCDuring TALK 11:00, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

title: Category talk:Nineteen Eighty-Four


text:
Talk:need it yesterday

RFM discussion: July 2010–August 2014
Move to need something yesterday. At COCA, "need it yesterday" came up twice, whereas other objects came up more than dozen times. DCDuring TALK 14:25, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
 * As the original page creator, I have no objections. However, I just worked out what COCA is, and I'm not sure how one would search for "need [object] yesterday." Ackatsis 04:23, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
 * They have help information in the box on the lower right of their main screen. Click at the pull-down menu where is says "more information". That's how I learned that "[need] * yesterday", "[need] * * yesterday", etc can be used to find out how often one, two, and more other words intervene between forms of "need" and "yesterday", and what those words are. COCA, BNC, and the Time database are all accessible at BYU and useful for slightly different Wiktionary purposes. DCDuring TALK 11:11, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
 * want it done yesterday would be perfectly attestable (I think). Mglovesfun (talk) 11:45, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The essence of the possibly idiomatic construction is the juxtaposition of "yesterday" with a verb in the present tense, rather than any particular wording. This is an efficient way of expressing the idea that something is late and still wanted. "I needed it is yesterday" (or "I wanted it done yesterday.") is at best ambiguous as to whether or not today is too late and the task is no longer worth doing.
 * I don't know what widely used linguistic notation scheme would support this generalization. We don't support "constructions" except through the the use of "one", "someone", and "something", some grammatical context tags, alternative forms, and usage notes. I have created Category:English idiomatic construction prototypes for such entries in the belief that each construction might warrant an appendix listing the instances of the construction that we have and the general principles governing the formations of instances. DCDuring TALK 15:28, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

 * Moved to need yesterday --Type56op9 (talk) 17:27, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:need it yesterday


text:
Category talk:Tolkien's legendarium

RFM discussion: October 2010
The name Tolkien's legendarium was chosen by me to create and organize certain categories and appendices. Namely, these are:

 * Category:Tolkien's legendarium
 * Category:Tolkien's legendarium derivations
 * Category:cs:Tolkien's legendarium derivations
 * Appendix:Tolkien's legendarium
 * Appendix:Tolkien's legendarium/lembas
 * etc.

Various contexts are better defined by the name of the author (e.g., Appendix:The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King does not seem an acceptable name).

However, not every author has a unique universe with a fancy name.

Since we have Appendix:Lewis Carroll and Appendix:Chespirito, I propose renaming the above appendices and categories to Appendix:J. R. R. Tolkien, Appendix:J. R. R. Tolkien derivations, Category:J. R. R. Tolkien, etc. --Daniel. 21:29, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The first version of my message did not include the part J. R. R. part. Since Mr. John Ronald Reuel Tolkien is formally known as J. R. R. Tolkien, I have since then adapted my proposal. --Daniel. 18:05, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

title: Category talk:Tolkien's legendarium


text:
Category talk:Words derived from place names

RFM discussion: October 2010
This one could get a better name too --Felonia 12:45, 10 October 2010 (UTC)


text:
Talk:carry a lot of weight

RFM discussion: July 2010–August 2014
If we have this at all, it should be at carry weight. I am not sure whether we have the right senses of carry and weight, but we should. It may be that we should not have carry weight as "carry" can take clout as a synonym for this sense of "weight" (See carry clout.). The sense is similar to the sense of "carry" with the complement (emotional) "baggage" (See carry baggage.). DCDuring TALK 11:52, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

 * Redirected --Type56op9 (talk) 17:26, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:carry a lot of weight


text:
Template talk:notcomp

RFM discussion: February 2011
Shouldn't this just redirect to Template:not comparable? Mglovesfun (talk) 14:54, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Agreed. --Daniel. 15:24, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I'd guess so, but first check how each is used. —msh210℠ (talk) 17:11, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

title: Template talk:notcomp


text:
Category talk:Dialectal

RFM discussion: May 2011
And the same for its language-specific subcategories as well. I don't really see why we have two different categories for what is essentially the same thing. —CodeCat 13:13, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Support, yes, ideally categorize by region, but if in doubt putting in Category:Regional English (that is, and not in a subcategory) is better than in Category:Dialectal, which according to Votes/2011-04/Lexical categories should not be used. Mglovesfun (talk) 13:16, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Support. --Daniel 17:17, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Oppose The problem is that many of the words categorized by the labels  and  in Wiktionary, and in other dictionaries, are not regionalisms, but belong to, or are considered typical of, a sociolect, ethnolect, genderlect, idiolect, technolect, slang, etc, or simply as non-standard. By dropping the label, we lose compatibility with other dictionaries. By assuming these are regionalisms, we would be misclassifying the entries. The only solution is to carefully re-catogerize each entry, but this might be impossible, because the dialect(al) label is often used on terms whose usage is too complex or ill-defined to categorize cleanly. —Michael Z. 2011-05-24 22:13 z
 * That's really an argument in favour of its deletion though. It's just not specific enough and also confusing. In any case, regardless of whether we merge it, it will need to be moved, because its proper name is 'English dialectal terms'. —CodeCat 22:22, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I agree that your argument doesn't actually give any reason to oppose this move. It gives a reason to categorize the entries more accurately - I mean who would oppose accurate categorization anyway - but no reason why your argument would lead to anyone opposing this move. Mglovesfun (talk) 22:48, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I think what he means is that by merging them completely, Regional English will contain some terms that are not regional. So what we really need to do is to move the regional entries, split the rest into other categories, and delete Dialectal itself. —CodeCat 22:52, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

 * I'm not against renaming the category. But as I wrote, I'm against recategorization of terms ignoring the range of meanings of dialect(al). If the lexicographers of the OED and other professional dictionaries have needed it for over a century, how are we to say it is unnecessary and to be eliminated this week? —Michael Z. 2011-05-25 03:27 z
 * If is so ambiguous, perhaps it should be replaced by . --Daniel 18:04, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

 * That would be like replacing all instances of with . —Michael Z. 2012-01-27 22:02 z

Merriam–Webster's Collegiate Dictionary (11 ed., 2003 [2004], p 18a): “The label dial for “dialect” indicates that the pattern of use of a word or sense is too complex for summary labeling: it usually includes several regional varieties of American English or of American and British English: [. . .] The label dial Brit indicates currency in several dialects of the Commonwealth; dial Eng indicates currency in one or more provincial dialects of England: [. . .]”

World Book Dictionary (2003, p 117): “Dialect means that the word is spoken in a certain district of a country or by a certain group of people.”

Yes, we should expand on dialectal when we can. No, we shouldn't summarily remove this information from our dictionary, or disregard it when we find it in other sources. —Michael Z. 2012-01-28 00:00 z

title: Category talk:Dialectal


text:
Category talk:Regional English

RFM discussion: May 2011

 * See Category talk:Dialectal.

RFM discussion: August 2020

 * See Category talk:Dialectal Southern Valley Yokuts.

title: Category talk:Regional English


text:
Category talk:English nouns ending in "-ism"

RFM discussion: June 2011–May 2014
I would merge this into Category:English words suffixed with -ism. They are essentially the same. Note the name of this category allows entries like prism too, as it simply requires that the last three letters be -ism, no matter if the word in question is suffixed with -ism or not. --Mglovesfun (talk) 17:43, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I agree. Obviously, the category is not intended to indiscriminately catch all words sharing a particular string of letters, and the collection is therefore better captured by a category that specifies that it is limited to words sharing a suffix. bd2412 T 17:59, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I strongly disagree. I begin with the second of MG's sentences. Words ending in "ism" include words like Marxism, which is actually derived from marxisme. This is not an isolated instance. Obviously the morphological "derivation" is different from the historical one. We have not resolved how to present the morphological pseudoderivation when it is differs from the historical etymology. Some entries show language such as (for Marxism) "from French Marxisme, equivalent to Marx + -ism". Until this problem is resolved this one suffix and this one category stands as a beacon is an example and a reminder of the incompleteness of our default approach to showing even affix derivations. (Other problems arise due to no distinction among the different etymologies of the same affix as in -er, etc.) DCDuring TALK 00:55, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Should this category, then, include prism, jism, and schism, which are morphologically completely unrelated to words having any -ism suffix equivalent? Would this be any different from a Category:English nouns ending in "-ark" or Category:English nouns ending in "-est"? bd2412 T 03:13, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Not if I were the sole decider. I have cleaned up similar misattributions of endings as suffixes (My favorite was -arian, which included Tocharian among others). The flow of meaning from Greek and Latin the English took many routes and cognates of the English -ism suffix may have been added in any of several ancestor languages. I am not sure how many suffixes fit this pattern, but I doubt that it will turn out to be a negligible share of English affixes. DCDuring TALK 04:10, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure that there's a contradiction here; a word can be suffixed with -ism and be from French, no? --Mglovesfun (talk) 08:59, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The fact that marxisme was borrowed as Marxism with no -e, shows that the morphology of the word was interpreted as consisting of Marx + -ism when it was borrowed. Therefore the word could arguably be considered a calque, not a borrowing. —CodeCat 15:09, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * @CodeCat: I don't disagree, but I would not want to extend the meaning of calque in this way because it is not understood by normal folk.
 * @MG: We seem to follow the fiction of single origin. So words that show evidence of having been borrowed whole from another language are not normally shown as having undergone "affixation". I suppose the normal process of a suffix becoming productive is that the suffix is abstracted from such "whole" borrowings and applied to first etymologically similar stems (eg, from the same language or language family), then to broader classes of stems in a more macaronic way. We could choose to ignore the historical pattern, but the "equivalent to" wording seems the best we can do. DCDuring TALK 15:28, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * If it's a 'fiction' why follow it at all? --Mglovesfun (talk) 08:54, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Because, as with most common fictions, not doing so would be too much for our little brains. Almost all (All?) of our conceptual schemes (eg, those underlying categorization) are fictions. If you'd care to, I'd be happy to discuss this on a user talk page. DCDuring TALK 14:03, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

 * I support the merge, unless we allow categories like the arbitrary Category:English nouns ending in "-ark" bd mentions. - -sche (discuss) 23:14, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

 * Coming awfully late to this discussion, I support the merge too. There's nothing wrong with saying "borrowed from French marxisme; synchronically analyzable as Marx + -ism", which will put the term both in Category:English terms derived from French and in Category:English words suffixed with -ism. I do this all the time for Irish words with suffixes that are inherited from Old Irish words with the same suffix, and in principle we could even do this for words like loved, which is historically directly from Old English lufode but at the same time is synchronically love + -ed. —Angr 09:55, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Merged and deleted. bd2412 T 03:37, 15 May 2014 (UTC)


text:
Talk:have serious designs

RFM discussion: July 2011
serious is just one possible adverb; should be either have designs, have designs on or even just something at designs. Mglovesfun (talk) 10:47, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
 * We should probably start with have designs on, which two idioms dictionaries have. This is a kind of light verb construction, some of which are included in Appendix:Collocations of do, have, make, and take. Syntactically it's an adjective. I think this a form of enallage. DCDuring TALK 12:15, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:have serious designs


text:
Category talk:Synchronized entries

RFM discussion: August–September 2011
This should be split by language (grey's Icelandic and Spanish entries are not synchronized, just the English one). I think all the current ones are English. I imagine will have to be updated too. --Bequw → τ 18:23, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, support, it would be possible to do this for other languages, like French words reformed in the 1990 spelling reforms, or Brazilian versus European Portuguese. So move to Category:Synchronized entries by language and create Category:English synchronized entries. NB also keep the z in the spelling of synchronized. Mglovesfun (talk) 14:12, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Done. --Bequw → τ 02:23, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

title: Category talk:Synchronized entries


text:
Category talk:Elementary particles

RFM discussion: June 2011
I think Category:Particle physics would make a better name for this category, because it contains more than just the names of particles. Terms like spin and colour should also go there, but currently the only viable category is Category:Physics, which is too broad. —CodeCat 17:44, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

title: Category talk:Elementary particles


text:
Category talk:Archaic spellings by language

RFM discussion: August 2011
And its only subcategory into Category:Archaic forms by language. See directly above for rationale (Category talk:Obsolete spellings by language when archived). Mglovesfun (talk) 11:03, 11 August 2011 (UTC)


text:
Talk:-bashing

-basher
These are a mistake, the hyphen isn't part of the spelling, it's simply that hyphens are often used to link words in English. We don't have -speaking for French-speaking, we just have speaking and -. Mglovesfun (talk) 11:01, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
 * See [[talk:-speaking]]. —msh210℠ (talk) 15:53, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
 * They are nouns. Redirect. — T AKASUGI Shinji (talk) 08:41, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:-bashing


text:
Category talk:en:US States

RFM discussion: October 2011–August 2013
to Category:en:US states please --Rockpilot 23:45, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
 * If only there were someplace to move it that didn't suffer from PNS syndrome. - -sche (discuss) 02:46, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I think it's more common to capitalize the 'S' of 'States'. Mglovesfun (talk) 08:41, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Because a 'US State' is a proper noun, so all words of it are capitalized. Mglovesfun (talk) 12:00, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
 * A proper noun? Not AFAICT. State is often capitalized in official works of the federal government (such as the Constitution and IIRC even modern Supreme Court opinions), but in my experience it's lowercase in everyday use. Perhaps cites will be useful here. —msh210℠ (talk) 16:48, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Indeed, why did I write that? Mglovesfun (talk) 16:46, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

 * I am neutral on this, but if I would note that Category:US States has quite a lot of subcats now, to the degree that a move would be more difficult than just replacing this specific category. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 21:45, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

title: Category talk:en:US States


text:
Category talk:Etymology

RFM discussion: December 2011
I think this should be merged with Category:Etymologies by language, which would mean deleting the subcategories like Category:fr:Etymology and moving the subcategories without language prefixes to Category:Etymologies by language. It doesn't seem topical; the only main namespace entry I can find directly in the topical categories is in Category:ro:Etymology, which is ! It seems very much counter-productive to have two categories doing the same job, with respect to finding subcategories but also for interwiki linking, which is what I was updating when I found this category. Mglovesfun (talk) 19:04, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * In fact that category only exists because of subcategories like Category:Biblical derivations, which aren't languages but nevertheless deserve treatment. -- Liliana • 19:06, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * If this category is to stay unmerged it should at least be renamed - perhaps to Category:Etymologies. --BiblbroX дискашн 21:51, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * @Liliana-60 I'm aware of that, but my points still stand, counter-productive to have this separate into two categories, one topical, one not. Mglovesfun (talk) 11:13, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

title: Category talk:Etymology


text:
Talk:-basher

RFM discussion: September–November 2011

 * See Talk:-bashing.

title: Talk:-basher


text:
Talk:Obamacare

RFM discussion: September–December 2011

 * See Talk:ObamaCare.

title: Talk:Obamacare


text:
Category talk:zh-tw:Variant Pronunciations

RFM discussion: February 2013–April 2014
This category has a bad name that refers to an obsolete code, but the content is good. It should be merged into Category:Taiwanese Mandarin and then it can be deleted. Same goes for Category:zh-cn:Variant Pronunciations and Category:Chinese Mandarin. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 07:23, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
 * "Chinese Mandarin" is very unclear as a name, though. It doesn't actually tell me what it really is, and only from what you said can I figure out that it is somehow distinct from "Taiwanese Mandarin". Many people would probably understand it to be a synonym of "Mandarin" or "Mandarin Chinese". 22:50, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

 * The correct category is Category:cmn:Variant pronunciations (before Mandarin->Chinese conversion is complete). Standard Taiwanese Mandarin (Guoyu) could be marked as "Taiwanese Mandarin" (even after the conversion), if they are different from mainland standard. An example is, which shows two standards. --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 23:27, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

RFDO discussion: September 2014–August 2015

 * See Category talk:zh:Variant pronunciations.


text:
Category talk:Zhuang characters

RFM discussion: February 2013
Move to Category:Zhuang sawndip. Should probably also be a member of Category:Han characters -- Liliana • 23:00, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

title: Category talk:Zhuang characters


text:
Talk:flashbang

RFM discussion: April 2013–January 2015
I propose to move this to flash-bang. Primary usage seems to hyphenated, followed by usage with a space (flash bang), and as a single word (flashbang).”. bd2412 T 01:11, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

 * Moved. - -sche (discuss) 02:32, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

title: Talk:flashbang


text:
Template talk:etyl:Lunfardo

RFM discussion: December 2013–January 2015
Lunfardo is a Spanish argot of sorts from the region of the River Plate. Currently there are Spanish entries for it, but they point out the Lunfardo heritage in the etymology sections, using this template, as if Lunfardo were a dialect of a different language. I see Lunfardo as a register of Spanish instead, and think that (like vesre) we should change it to being a context label and edit all the entries thus. Note that some Lunfardo words only seem to be used in running text in milongas, whereas others have been borrowed into the mainstream and are found in otherwise normal/colloquial Spanish text; I'm not sure how we can or should try to distinguish these. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 04:19, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The context label for Spanish can be created if necessary, but I oppose the deletion of this template as there are Lunfardo loanwords in other languages. — Ungoliant (Falai) 19:06, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * If that's true, then it does seem worthwhile to keep this template (or, now that it's been moved to a module: this code). - -sche (discuss) 21:16, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

 * Kept. - -sche (discuss) 23:10, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

title: Template talk:etyl:Lunfardo


text:
Category talk:Greenlandic Eskimo Pidgin language

RFM discussion: September 2013–January 2015
I propose renaming the language Greenlandic Eskimo Pidgin to Greenlandic Pidgin. doesn’t even pass CFI, while does. Another possibility is, which is what Wikipedia calls it.

The language’s only entry originally had the heading “Greenlandic Pidgin”, which was then changed by Daniel Carrero apparently without due process, so that’s an argument for speedy-renaming it back to the original name. — Ungoliant (Falai) 14:35, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

 * ✅. - -sche (discuss) 23:08, 22 January 2015 (UTC)


text:
Category talk:English terms derived from Medieval Greek

RFM discussion: December 2013–January 2015
To Category:English terms derived from Byzantine Greek. We have a separate code "gkm" for Byzantine Greek, so we might as well use it. 18:37, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

 * Moved. - -sche (discuss) 02:37, 22 January 2015 (UTC)


text: binnering

title: binnering


text: binnered

title: binnered


text:
涙骨

Noun

 * 1) a lacrimal bone

title: 涙骨


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 涙 read as るい


text:
User talk:NemoNF

(NemoNF (talk) 01:54, 26 January 2015 (UTC)) Sorry, the previous definition (and the current) dedicates most of the text to explain the things that a 1NF could be in its own past. A relation in 1NF is a just created table ready to be normalized. The conditions for being normalized are positive, short and relevant.(NemoNF (talk) 01:54, 26 January 2015 (UTC))

Database terms
Hi. I don't think these are improvements. You're adding a lot of technical stuff like Codd notation that won't help an everyday dictionary reader. We should just be explaining the purpose of these things in a dictionary definition, not writing a manual or a Wikipedia article. Equinox ◑ 01:13, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:NemoNF


text:
孥囝

Noun

 * 1)  child

title: 孥囝


text:
嘴骨

Noun

 * 1) rostral bone

title: 嘴骨


text:
rostral bone

Noun

 * 1) The edentulous ossification that forms the ceratopsian beak.

Translations

 * German: Rostralknochen
 * Japanese: 嘴骨

title: rostral bone


text:
坐骨

Noun

 * 1)  ischium

title: 坐骨


text: ざこつ

title: ざこつ


text: zakotsu

title: zakotsu


text:
Talk:Baramulla District

RFM discussion: February–March 2014
A while ago, a user created a large number of entries like Baramulla District using this IP and this IP. Much of the time, it seems to me that the actual lemma is "Baramulla", and "Baramulla district" or, with honorific capitalization, "Baramulla District" is merely a SOPpy descriptor like "North-Rhine-Westphalia State". That is, I think many of the entries should be moved from Baramulla District, etc to Baramulla, etc. (Compare Odessa’s "oblast" sense.) - -sche (discuss) 22:16, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Support. —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 19:42, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I've started moving entries. - -sche (discuss) 22:05, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:Baramulla District


text:
指骨

Noun

 * 1) phalanx of the fingers

Noun

 * 1) a phalanx of the hand; a finger bone

title: 指骨


text:
趾骨

Noun

 * 1) phalanx (of the toes)

Noun

 * 1) a phalanx of the foot; a toe bone

title: 趾骨


text: びこつ

title: びこつ


text: bikotsu

title: bikotsu


text: 胶漆

title: 胶漆


text:
滑翔

Verb

 * 1) to glide; to soar

title: 滑翔


text: 视角

title: 视角


text:
User:NemoNF

Noun

 * 1)  A relational table with its name, its set of attributes and a fair corpus of rows, ready to normalization. A first normal form (abbreviated 1NF) has five properties: P1: Each item is homogeneous along the column; P2: Each item, a number or a string; P3: Each row, unique; P4: Row ordering does not carry information; P5: Attribute ordering does not carry information.

Related terms

 * second normal form
 * third normal form
 * fourth normal form
 * fifth normal form
 * Boyce-Codd normal form

first normal form

title: User:NemoNF


text: 干酪素

title: 干酪素


text: 肾盂

title: 肾盂


text:
沼氣

Noun

 * 1) marsh gas, swamp gas

title: 沼氣


text: 沼气

title: 沼气


text:
瘴氣

Noun

 * 1) miasma

title: 瘴氣


text:
Category talk:Translation requests (Norwegian)

RFM discussion: March 2014–January 2015
We currently treat Norwegian Nynorsk and Norwegian Bokmål as separate languages, and yet this category has many more entries than Category:Translation requests (Norwegian Bokmål) and Category "Translation requests (Norwegian Nynorsk) combined. I understand that there may be dialectal forms that belong to neither, but it seems obvious to me that most of these were added with Bokmål in mind, and pretty much all of the rest with Nynorsk intended. After all, requesting a Norwegian translation won't get you a dialectal form unless there's some way to ask for it specifically.

The first part should be to change all the current requests to Bokmål and/or Nynorsk and try to find some way to discourage or prevent people from adding the requests. Then we can talk about deleting or deprecating the plain Norwegian category.

I would think the most painless method would be to change the code for or whatever it calls to intercept the language code "no" and replace it with "nb", or to create two categories, one for "nb" and one for "nn". This would have to be at a higher level than the language lookup, because there are are some other templates that we still no doubt want to allow to have "no"-based output.

This is bound to be a bit messy and/or controversial, so I'd like to encourage other suggestions. Chuck Entz (talk) 22:58, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

 * Oppose. "Norwegian" is also treated as a language; its code is ever-present in Module:languages, and many entries use ==Norwegian== headers. I have thought for a long time that we should un-split Nynorsk and Bokmal, the opposite of what you suggest. (Alternatively, we could split US and Indian English, which are about as distinct, and put an end to the occasional bickering about whether words should end in '-our' or '-or', etc.) - -sche (discuss) 00:19, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I think that the two language should be merged, mainly because the two forms are primarily different in writing and not actual pronunciation or vocabulary. There are some vocabulary differences, but of course plenty of people will use vocabulary present in neither standard. And I'm pretty sure that a Norwegian will pronounce a word the same in their own speech whether they write it with Bokmål or Nynorsk spelling. 00:36, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

 * The fact that "no" is not allowed as a language code, makes it difficult to use accelerated method to add translations to or . I support merging Nynorsk and Bokmål. We could use / + subcategories of Norwegian. --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 02:28, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I have removed the code that blocked the addition of 'no' translations. They should never have been blocked, even by people who want to retain Nynorsk and Bokmål as separate languages, because we as a descriptivist dictionary allow dialectal Norwegian words as translations (and these words, since they are not Nynorsk nor Bokmål, must use 'no' rather than 'nb' or 'nn'). - -sche (discuss) 01:07, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

 * See Beer parlour/2014/March. - -sche (discuss) 03:57, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

 * Closed with no action taken one way or the other. A vote on the subject showed that there was no consensus regarding whether to have "Norwegian" or "Bokmal"+"Nynorsk", so we still have all three. - -sche (discuss) 02:48, 22 January 2015 (UTC)


text: 鹡鸰

title: 鹡鸰


text: 瘴气

title: 瘴气


text:
budíček

Noun

 * 1) reveille
 * 1) reveille

title: budíček


text:
čítankový

Adjective

 * 1) textbook

title: čítankový


text:
důstojník

Noun

 * 1) officer (military, police etc)

title: důstojník


text:
iluzorní

Adjective

 * 1) illusory

title: iluzorní


text:
lízátko

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) lollipop

title: lízátko


text:
nočník

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) potty, chamber pot

Noun

 * 1) potty, chamber pot

title: nočník


text:
poklopec

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) fly (on trousers)

title: poklopec


text:
sídliště

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) housing estate, council estate

title: sídliště


text:
Việt Cộng

Etymology
. Compare.

Proper noun

 * 1)  Communist Vietnam
 * 2)  Vietcong

Usage notes
Among overseas Vietnamese and along with dissidents and democracy activists in Vietnam, most often right-wing, the term is used, usually derisively, to refer to a member or sympathizer of the Vietcong or the current Communist government. In Vietnam, the official term is.

Synonyms

 * Quân Giải phóng miền Nam Việt Nam
 * Quân Giải phóng miền Nam Việt Nam

title: Việt Cộng


text:
Template talk:U:es:false friend

RFM discussion: July 2014–January 2015
To whatever extent it's actually worthwhile to have usage notes that amount to "hey, did you notice that none of the definitions of this word are its English homograph? whodathunkit?", it seems to me that we could have a single template that users supply a language code to, and/or invoke via language-specific shell templates, rather than having Template:U:es:false friend, Template:U:gl:false friend and potentially other templates duplicate each other's guts. So, would you all rather merge the templates into a single Template:U:false friend that would accept a language code parameter, and/or keep et al as shortcut equivalents to , or what? - -sche (discuss) 02:27, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
 * We don’t need language specific templates for this. I support merging them. — Ungoliant (falai) 15:19, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

 * I've created Template:U:false friend and left Template:U:es:false friend and Template:U:gl:false friend as shortcuts to it. - -sche (discuss) 20:34, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

title: Template talk:U:es:false friend


text:
Template talk:U:gl:false friend

RFM discussion: July 2014–January 2015

 * See Template talk:U:es:false friend.

title: Template talk:U:gl:false friend


text:
Category talk:en:Nationalities

RFM discussion: August 2014–January 2015
This category, as well as the equivalents in other languages, contain many terms that are not strictly nationalities as they are not associated with actual countries. Instead, these seem to be more generally "place-name adjectives". So I think we should rename this category. —CodeCat 21:59, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Nationalities don't have to be associated with actual countries- they can be ethnicities as well. Besides, there are cases such as Inuit where there's no place name involved. Chuck Entz (talk) 22:39, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
 * But I'm pretty sure that when someone says "my nationality is Inuit", that it will give some raised eyebrows. —CodeCat 22:42, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Umm... no. In fact Inuits are one of the so-called "First Nations", so the word "nationality" naturally applies. While I agree that "nationality" is not the best term for the category, I think your proposed name is worse. --WikiTiki89 22:50, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I've been looking for another possible term for this, but I'm struggling to find anything. Do you have any ideas? We can't use "ethnicities" because state-level nationality is not necessarily an ethnicity. Maybe we should really have two categories: one for place names and one for ethnicities that are not associated with place names. —CodeCat 22:56, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

 * Oppose this proposal to turn a topical category into a curious lexical category. Also see and  for the relative rarity of that designation. And indeed, nationalities are not restricted to relations to countries. --Dan Polansky (talk) 22:53, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I think a nationality does have to be an association with a country. But it doesn't mean we should rename this category, move out the bad entries and put them in Category:en:Demonyms. Renard Migrant (talk) 11:06, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

 * Don't rename. I agree with Chuck's comment. Not all nationality designations are derived from placename designations; "Inuit" and "Crow" are examples, but "Dutch" and "Drukpa" are also examples, aren't they? "Dutch" isn't etymologically connected to any placename that is still in use in English; it's semantically associated with "Netherlands", but then, "Crow" is semantically associated with "Crow Nation" / "Crow Reservation", "Inuit" with "Inuit territory", etc. I don't think it would make sense to label either "Crow" or "Dutch" a "place-name adjective". (Notably both "Crow Nation" and the etymological placename relative of "Dutch", the archaic "Dutchland", seem to be derived from their corresponding nationality terms.) Terms that are not nationalities in any sense can be moved to the Demonyms category as Renard suggestions. - -sche (discuss) 18:58, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The demonyms category is for nouns for individual people. The proposed category is for adjectives. In English, the adjectives can normally be used as collective nouns for the people, but this doesn't apply to other languages of course. Compare Dutch and . —CodeCat 19:14, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I just noticed that according to both Wiktionary and Wikipedia, a demonym is the name of an inhabitant or native of a specific place. So it is not appropriate to place terms like "Inuit" there. In fact, it appears that we currently have no category at all where that word belongs. We should find a solution for this. —CodeCat 19:21, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Oh, I had thought "demonym" meant any "term for a people" (because "democide" is generic systematic "killing of people"). You're right in your second comment that it seems to actually be limited to people from a specific place. Well, there are several possibilities for ethnic-group names, e.g. "ethnonyms", "ethnicities", "ethnic groups". If the Inuit are deemed to not even form one ethnic group (and hence one ethnonym), then WP's definition ("a group of culturally similar indigenous peoples") suggests we don't need to categorize that term at all, any more than other "cultural groups" like "Goths" (the black-clad ones, not the ones that wrote like 𐌰𐌱𐌲). - -sche (discuss) 23:59, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Ethnicities can form a tree though. For example, Poles are a subset of Slavs. Often ethnic and linguistic trees coincide, but certainly not always. I'd say that the Inuit are a larger group even if they have smaller subgroups. The question then becomes whether "ethnonym" is suitable for a term like "Londoner" or even for "Russian". Ethnic Russians are quite different from people who live in Russia. —CodeCat 00:44, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Good point re trees. So, "Inuit" can still be an ethnonym. "Russian" is both an ethnonym (in sense 2, "a member of the East Slavic ethnic group which constitutes the majority of the population of Russia") and a nationality (in sense 1, "a person from the Russian Federation"), with 'nationality' being a subcategory of 'demonym'. Likewise many nationalities: "German" (=nationality, =ethnicity), "Brazilian", "Nepali", etc. In some analyses, "Haida" is also both an ethnonym and a nationality, but unlike "Russian" where one sense is the nationality and another sense is the ethnonym, "Haida" has a single sense that is both at once. "Londoner" is exclusively a demonym and not an ethnonym, right? Likewise most city designations. - -sche (discuss) 02:51, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
 * How is Haida a nationality though? I don't know of any country called that. —CodeCat 10:44, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
 * "Country" and "nation" are two different things. ("State" is another different thing.) Indeed, the first usex of the first sense of [[nation]] is "the Roma are a nation without a country", and the second is "the Kurdish people constitute a nation in the Middle East"; I've just added some similar citations from literature to Citations:nation. The Haida are a First Nation. Like the Kurds are associated with Kurdistan and the Ukrainians are associated with Ukraine, the Haida are associated with the / . Notably, neither the Kurds / Kurdistan nor the Haida / Haida Gwaii nor the Ukrainians / Ukraine have always been a nation in sense 2 of that word, which raises a question: even if one argued that Category:Nationalities should be restricted to sense-2 nations to the exclusion of sense-1 nations, would it be only for entities that are at present sovereign states, or would it also include things which historically constituted such, e.g. would "Czechoslovak" go in the category? Most entities which are nations in sense 1 have at some point also been nations in sense 2 — including the Haida, who regardless of their status in the current period were the sovereign governors of a territory in the period before and shortly after European contact. - -sche (discuss) 17:31, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
 * That's a good point. But in the end the question remains: if "nationality" is not appropriate or is too misleading, what term should we use? And what can we do to ensure that only adjectives end up in the category? Including "adjectives" in the name would make it no longer a topical category, despite DCDuring's misgivings. —CodeCat 10:45, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

We can put ethnonyms like sense 2,, ,  etc. in Category:en:Ethnicity. Or even better, we can rename the latter to Category:en:Ethnonyms. --Vahag (talk) 21:06, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Closed as not moved: No consensus to move. Pur ple back pack 89  22:30, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

title: Category talk:en:Nationalities


text:
Category talk:English place-name adjectives

RFM discussion: August 2014–January 2015

 * See Category talk:en:Nationalities.


text:
Template talk:alternative capitalization of

RFM discussion: August–November 2014
This template and its friends (Template:obsolete capitalization of and any similarly named templates) have been discussed before here and here, with some users objecting to the use of the templates on lowercase strings like protestant and god. Would it make sense to change the display text from "alternative capitalization of" to something else, e.g. "alternative case form of"? The template names would not necessarily have to be changed, and if they were changed, the current names could be kept as redirects. - -sche (discuss) 23:30, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

 * ‘Alternative case form of’ does sound superior. It’s misleading to call lower‐case forms ‘capitalizations.’ We should modify the wording to be more inclusive. --Romanophile (talk) 19:10, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

 * I agree with -sche. — I.S.M.E.T.A. 13:53, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

 * Moved to Template:alternative case form of, with Template:alternative capitalization of left as a redirect. - -sche (discuss) 14:29, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

 * Sorry for objecting so late, but recently when I see "case" in a dictionary, I tend to think of grammatical case, not letter case. I think this may cause more confusion than it solves. — Keφr 14:55, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

 * I'd've objected as well as, while supposedly more 'inclusive', it's a lot less clear what it refers to. Seems ultimately self-defeating, perhaps replace with in order to be less confusing. Renard Migrant (talk) 15:22, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

 * What about changing what is displayed to ""? — I.S.M.E.T.A. 18:27, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

 * Oppose: Because it was better at the old title, because nobody uses "alternative case form" and lots of people use "alternative capitalization", because it wasn't properly tagged as an RfM, and because it should have been better publicized because this is such a high-profile template. Pur ple back pack 89


text:
pararlas

Verb

 * 1)  to make sense of the situation or of what has been said

title: pararlas


text: wéirào

title: wéirào


text:
kiliwi

Noun

 * 1) house gecko

title: kiliwi


text:
蹄骨

Noun

 * 1) coffin bone; pedal bone

Noun

 * 1) coffin bone, pedal bone

title: 蹄骨


text:
ていこつ

Noun

 * 1)  coffin bone, pedal bone

title: ていこつ


text: teikotsu

title: teikotsu


text:
premedial

Adjective

 * 1)  Antemedial; located before the middle.

Etymology 2
Related to.

Adjective

 * 1)  Premeditated.

title: premedial


text:
骨炎

Noun

 * 1)  osteitis

title: 骨炎


text:
こつえん

Adjective

 * 1)  sudden

Noun

 * 1)  osteitis

title: こつえん


text: kotsuen

title: kotsuen


text:
павінен

Etymology
. Cognate with 🇨🇬 and 🇨🇬.

Predicative

 * 1) must
 * 2) should, ought to
 * 3) have to
 * 4)  owe, obligated

Usage notes
In all tenses with the exception of the present tense, the appropriate forms of the verb are used.

title: павінен


text:
Eigengrau

Noun

 * 1) eigengrau

title: Eigengrau


text: açucar

title: açucar


text: dangling modifiers

title: dangling modifiers


text:
猜拳

Etymology
The Hakka pronunciations come from.

Verb

 * 1) to play a game in which the participant guesses the figures the opponent will express with fingers, often as a drinking game
 * 2)  to play rock paper scissors

title: 猜拳


text: 豁拳

title: 豁拳


text: 搳拳

title: 搳拳


text:
gái bán hoa

Noun

 * 1)  working girl; female prostitute; literally "flower-selling girl"

title: gái bán hoa


text:
擿伏

Verb

 * 1)  to expose evil; to bring a terrible secret to light

title: 擿伏


text: tīfú

title: tīfú


text: tìfú

title: tìfú


text: tangors

title: tangors


text: temple orange

title: temple orange


text: temple oranges

title: temple oranges


text:
fernowl

Noun

 * 1) A bird, the nightjar.

title: fernowl


text: fernowls

title: fernowls


text:
hedgewitch

Noun

 * 1) A modern witch who focuses on herbalism and shamanic experience.

title: hedgewitch


text: hedgewitches

title: hedgewitches


text:
kritiikittömästi

Adverb

 * 1) uncritically

title: kritiikittömästi


text:
Fleming valve

Etymology
Invented in 1904 by John Ambrose Fleming.

Noun

 * 1) An early kind of vacuum tube.

title: Fleming valve


text: Fleming valves

title: Fleming valves


text: Category:el:Theology

title: Category:el:Theology


text:
μονοούσιος

Adjective

 * 1)  monoousian

Usage notes

 * Feminine form -ος if formal, used often for this formal, old verb

title: μονοούσιος


text:
αβρόμιστος

Adjective

 * 1) clean
 * 2) unsoiled, untainted, undirtied

Synonyms

 * see:
 * see:

title: αβρόμιστος


text: Category:en:Oomycetes

title: Category:en:Oomycetes


text: Category:Oomycetes

title: Category:Oomycetes


text:
αβρόφρων

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) well-mannered

title: αβρόφρων


text: Template:ar-verb-form

title: Template:ar-verb-form


text:
άβροχα

Adverb

 * 1) rainlessly, drily, dryly

title: άβροχα


text:
αβύζαχτος

Adjective

 * 1) unsuckled

title: αβύζαχτος


text:
Ausrutscher

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) slip (An act or instance of slipping on a slippery surface.)
 * 2)  lapsus, gaffe

title: Ausrutscher


text:
αβύθιστος

Adjective

 * 1) unsinkable
 * 2) not sunk, unsunk
 * 1) not sunk, unsunk

title: αβύθιστος


text: Template:ar-act-participle

title: Template:ar-act-participle


text: Template:ar-pass-participle

title: Template:ar-pass-participle


text: stijlmiddel

title: stijlmiddel


text: stijlmiddelen

title: stijlmiddelen


text: stijlmiddelje

title: stijlmiddelje


text: stijlmiddeljes

title: stijlmiddeljes


text:
Википеэди

Etymology
From, from.

Proper noun

 * 1) Wikipedia

title: Википеэди


text:
accordicchio

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) an opaque or ambiguous compromise agreement

title: accordicchio


text:
Reconstruction:Proto-Slavic/trava

Etymology
Probably from.

Of uncertain origin, with no analogues outside of Slavic. Apparently related to 🇨🇬, however, not certain in what manner.

Possibly from the same root as 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, which are believed to continue. For similar vṛddhi-like construction, compare from. If correct, then likely akin to 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, and 🇨🇬.

See for further discussion.

Noun

 * 1) grass

Descendants

 * East Slavic:
 * South Slavic:
 * Cyrillic:
 * Glagolitic:
 * West Slavic:
 * Moravian :
 * Sorbian:
 * Cyrillic:
 * Glagolitic:
 * West Slavic:
 * Moravian :
 * Sorbian:
 * West Slavic:
 * Moravian :
 * Sorbian:
 * West Slavic:
 * Moravian :
 * Sorbian:
 * Moravian :
 * Sorbian:
 * Sorbian:
 * Sorbian:
 * Sorbian:

title: Reconstruction:Proto-Slavic/trava


text:
afinalistico

Adjective

 * 1)  performed without a precise goal

title: afinalistico


text: ontlastinkje

title: ontlastinkje


text: ontlastinkjes

title: ontlastinkjes


text: Balotelli

title: Balotelli


text:
ben altro

Etymology
lit. 'well other'.

Determiner

 * 1)  other, more important

Pronoun

 * 1)  other (more important) things
 * 2)  other, more important
 * 1)  other, more important

title: ben altro


text:
cambusada

Noun

 * 1)  archival (of a discussion page)

title: cambusada


text: ciattare

title: ciattare


text:
fermatrecce

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) hair tie

Usage notes

 * Used especially of ancient metal coils etc. used for keeping braids of hair together.

title: fermatrecce


text:
fettunta

Etymology
From.

title: fettunta


text:
fotoracconto

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) story told via photographs
 * 2) photojournalism

title: fotoracconto


text:
metaboliet

Etymology
From.

title: metaboliet


text: metabolieten

title: metabolieten


text:
кәйеф

Etymology
From , from.

Noun

 * 1) mood, a person's emotional state

title: кәйеф