text:
Talk:embalming fluid

RFD
Nope, just a fluid used for embalming. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 05:52, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
 * But it's a particular fluid or combination of chemicals, not just whatever happens to be used; a regular phrase with a specific meaning, like post office, hood ornament, or mixing bowl. A compound word, to be sure, but because it refers to a specific medium rather than a generic one in a particular sense, it seems like an appropriate entry.  In other words, it's idiomatic because the meaning is more specific than the sum of its parts; not just any fluid that an embalmer might happen to use, but a specific fluid or fluids used for that particular purpose; according to the criteria for inclusion, it meets the "fried egg test".  Not sure if it helps to know this, but a raw Google search just now showed that about 1/3 of all mentions of "embalming" are for the specific phrase "embalming fluid."  P Aculeius (talk) 12:02, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
 * "...it refers to a specific medium..."—the thing is, it doesn't refer to anything specific in terms of contents, but to "a variety of preservatives, sanitising and disinfectant agents and additives... Typically embalming fluid contains a mixture of formaldehyde, methanol, and other solvents." (bold mine). Pfftallofthemaretaken (talk) 12:53, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
 * But because there are typical ingredients or mixtures that are used for embalming, rather than other purposes, it's a particular thing, not just any fluid that an embalmer might happen to pour into a corpse. Embalming fluid isn't the same thing as say, lighter fluid; not just because it's poured into the body cavity, rather than a lighter, but because it necessarily consists of different things.  Embalming fluid may not always consist of the exact same mixture, but it's definitely not just any fluid that an embalmer might make use of (no rule against embalmers using lighter fluid to light a cigarette or start a fire, is there?).  Note the fried egg test mentioned under criteria for inclusion.  A fried egg means a specific way of preparing an egg, even though other ways of cooking an egg also involve frying (note that just because a fried egg is a specific thing, it doesn't have to be fried in exactly the same way every time).  The phrase "embalming fluid" is more than the sum of its parts, meaning more than simply the word "embalming" plus the word "fluid."  If it were, then any fluid would become "embalming fluid" if an embalmer poured it into someone, whether or not it's normally used in the embalming process, or has the desired effect of embalming.  It doesn't have to consist of one and only one combination of ingredients; note that lighter fluid doesn't have to be butane, but could be naphtha or conceivably any fluid that might be used for the same purpose in a lighter, but it wouldn't refer to bodily fluids, even if you put them in a lighter.  P Aculeius (talk) 13:42, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
 * "If it were, then any fluid would become "embalming fluid" if an embalmer poured it into someone, whether or not it's normally used in the embalming process, or has the desired effect of embalming." (bold mine)—that's actually it: any fluid becomes embalming fluid if it has the desired effect of embalming. Whatever people in Ancient Egypt used for embalming probably differed substantially from what is used now. And even components used nowadays differ depending on who does the embalming and where it takes place. In the future, we might come up with totally different components, and used together they will still be called "embalming fluid". Pfftallofthemaretaken (talk) 13:56, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, I believe that's what I said. And it would still be a distinct thing, separate from lighter fluid or amniotic fluid or spinal fluid.  It's not a random confluence (pardon the pun) of words.  There's a rather limited number of regularly-encountered phrases (or idioms, or compound words, however you want to call it) involving fluid, and this is one of them.  It's not merely fluid that happens to be involved in some way in the process of embalming, such as something that leaks out of the body when somebody is being embalmed, or something you find in embalmed people.  It's something specific that embalmers use in the embalming process.  The fact that it can consist of different ingredients doesn't make the words generic, any more than a fried egg isn't a thing because you can fry it with butter, margerine, or oil, or because you can fry a chicken egg, a turkey egg, or an ostrich egg, or because you can add salt or pepper or other ingredients as you fry it.  It's still different from a scrambled egg, even though a scrambled egg is also cooked by frying.  And embalming fluid is distinct from the concept of "any fluid that one might encounter in the course of, due to, or after embalming."  Such fluids could also be described generically as "embalming fluids" even if they're not used for the purpose of embalming, the same as many berries are blue without being blueberries.  But when you use the phrase "embalming fluid," you create the expectation that you're referring specifically to the fluids used by a mortician to embalm someone, not other fluids to which the word "embalming" could theoretically be applied.  For instance, if somebody fell into a vat of some liquid and were unintentionally embalmed, that would be "an embalming fluid" in the generic sense, as long as the person were embalmed in it.  And any fluid combined with it later would be "an embalming fluid".  But that wouldn't make it "embalming fluid", which is a liquid prepared for the express purpose of embalming, no matter what it's made of.  P Aculeius (talk) 15:57, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
 * It may be a "distinct thing", but dictionaries are for "words", not "things". Encyclopedias are for "things". In this case, the "thing" is identifiable by reading our entries for the "words" and . --WikiTiki89 16:01, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
 * How is it different from "lighter fluid" then? Anything can be used as an embalming fluid, as long as it embalms. Anything can be used as a lighter fluid, as long as it lights a lighter. In fact, there could conceivably be a substance that could function as both an embalming fluid and a lighter fluid. Let's call it Fluid X. How would you define Fluid X? What if it can also be used as a substitute for blood, or, say, to treat cancer? Would you call it "embalming fluid" or "new blood"? Why not "lighter fluid"? Or better yet, "lighter fluid lite". And what if somebody runs a test on it and discovers that it only contains salt and water, and all of its properties are just imaginary? Salt and water—what kind of fluid is that? Can you embalm with that? Or what if it's genuine, but comes from China? And by China I mean PRC. And you don't know what's in it. And you are legally forbidden to run the test because they put a copyright on that product. No tinkering with the source code. Would you use that for embalming? Would you trust the CPC with that? Why on earth would you use anything for embalming? Who are you going to embalm, and why? It would make as much sense as writing countless paragraphs full of musings about embalming on the Internet!
 * My point being—there must be a less voluminous and convoluted way of making a point than the one you tend to employ. If you could find it, maybe people wouldn't get lost in your arguments and waste their time contradicting you with points that in fact don't contradict what you say at all.
 * As for the reasons the entry should be deleted—what Wikitiki89 said. Much more succinct, and you don't have to drag bodily fluids into the discussion. Pfftallofthemaretaken (talk) 16:43, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
 * It sucks but this doesn't meet CFI so it should be deleted. Renard Migrant (talk) 18:06, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

 * Keep. If I get a water pistol and fill it with "embalming fluid" and spray it on random bystanders, will they suddenly become enbalmed? No? Then there is idiomatic limitation to its usage. bd2412 T 18:14, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Umm... That's a feature of embalming, not of the fluid. You can't just take a living person and suddenly embalm them. In case what you meant to ask is whether the fluid you sprayed is still embalming fluid since you are not using it for embalming: Well, is a salad bowl still a salad bowl if you put soup in it? Yes, a salad bowl is still a salad bowl even when you put soup in it and embalming fluid shot out of a water gun is still embalming fluid (and the water gun is still a water gun), but that doesn't mean that is not evidence that these noun phrases are lexicalized. --WikiTiki89 19:17, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
 * BD2412, relevance? Renard Migrant (talk) 19:30, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
 * The relevance is what most of the people replying keep missing. The phrase is idiomatic because it refers to a particular thing that is more than the sum of its parts.  The criteria for inclusion clearly explains this concept, and I've been trying to get that idea across, apparently without much success.  "Green fluid" isn't idiomatic.  "Smelly fluid" isn't idiomatic.  "Cattle rustling fluid" isn't idiomatic.  They're all phrases, they all mean something, or possibly a whole range of things.  But "embalming fluid" is a very specific thing, and it doesn't encompass every fluid to which the word "embalming" could possibly apply, and as BD2412 tried to explain, it's embalming fluid whether or not you happen to be embalming anything with it.  Simply because something is a noun and might warrant an encyclopedic discussion doesn't mean that it doesn't belong in a dictionary.  Most dictionaries do include words like this, even if they don't always include every word that could possibly be included.  Webster's Third, for example, doesn't include "salad bowl," but does include "salad plate" and "salad fork."  No harm is done by including a one-sentence definition of a word merely because you could get several paragraphs about it in an encyclopedia.  P Aculeius (talk) 19:58, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
 * "...I've been trying to get that idea across, apparently without much success."—could it be that there's something wrong with the message then?.. The phrase is not idiomatic, because—here's the definition of 'idiom' from the Oxford Dictionary of English: a group of words established by usage as having a meaning not deducible from those of the individual words (e.g. over the moon, see the light) (bold mine). "Embalming fluid" is not an idiom, because its meaning is totally deductible from the individual words. What's more, it's totally just a sum of parts, as 'embalming' here means 'that which embalms', not 'that which is used during embalming', so it's literally 'embalming' + 'fluid', "fluid that embalms". Pfftallofthemaretaken (talk) 20:13, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
 * If it is "fluid that embalms", why can't I embalm a random stranger by pouring a bucket of it on him? "Salad bowl" is an apples and oranges comparison. "Salad" is not a gerund. Compare running shoe. bd2412 T 20:18, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Because it's not "fluid that can embalm anything even if it cannot normally be embalmed", it is just "fluid that embalms" or "fluid for embalming" (just like "bowl for salad"). If you could embalm a random stranger on the street at will, then it would be with embalming fluid, wouldn't it? --WikiTiki89 20:28, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
 * If I had a fluid that would instantly embalm a stranger on the street, I would think it would need to be called something other than "embalming fluid" to avoid confusing it with fluid engineered for embalming. If I mix pineapple juice and cranberry juice together, it might make a juice that is orange, but it wouldn't be right to call it "orange juice". bd2412 T 20:44, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Maybe you can embalm a random stranger by pouring embalming liquid on them. We don't know. Because, as it has been established, there are no established components for an embalming fluid—they differ all the time, from culture to culture, from epoch to epoch. We simply don't know what it is. What are we defining??
 * Why would you call that fluid something else? Take WD-40—you can use it for almost anything in the world (probably for embalming too). Do people call WD-40 something else every time they use it for something else? Pfftallofthemaretaken (talk) 20:52, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
 * My point is that you can't embalm a random stranger regardless of the fluid you use, because that wouldn't make sense under the definition of embalm. --WikiTiki89 21:06, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

 * Keep: Are there any uses of "embalming fluid" outside the most common context? e.g. I assume coroners use more than one fluid in their job, are they ever referred to together as "embalming fluids"? Is "embalming fluid" also used in reference to, say, ancient Egyptian embalming? Or just the modern array of fluids? WurdSnatcher (talk) 21:23, 25 September 2015 (UTC) (Edit: Okay, I've been convinced to keep.)
 * "Ancient Egyptian embalming fluid" gets zero readable Google Books hits, and a half dozen regular Google hits (the most comprehensible comes from this "Bee & Honey Facts" blog, which says that "[h]oney has been used an ancient Egyptian embalming fluid, as a cure for burns, as sweetener for tea, and much more"). bd2412 T 23:15, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
 * When I looked up "embalming" and "embalming fluid" on Wikipedia, I saw numerous references to other methods of embalming, and a few fluids used for embalming other than those used nowadays, but none of them were referred to as "embalming fluid." When Nelson was embalmed in brandy, the brandy was literally an embalming fluid, but it was still just brandy, not "embalming fluid."  In other words, the phrase "embalming fluid" means something more specific than "any liquid with which someone might happen to be embalmed."  It doesn't depend on an actual embalming to become embalming fluid; it's embalming fluid even if you pour it over your driveway.  The key is that it's a fluid produced for the specific purpose of embalming, whether or not someone is actually embalmed in it, and the fact that someone is embalmed in a fluid doesn't make that liquid "embalming fluid".  P.S. not sure that a modern web site's statement that honey was used as "embalming fluid" by the Egyptians tells us much about the specific meaning of the phrase, since it's A) obviously influenced by the use of the phrase in modern English; B) if an Egyptian were found immersed in honey, we would say honey, not embalming fluid; and C) embalming fluid refers to something produced for the purpose of embalming; that's the defining criterion.  The precise ingredients don't seem to be essential in determining whether something is or isn't embalming fluid.  P Aculeius (talk) 23:35, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
 * There's also the matter of the bodily fluids displaced by the embalming fluid and drained from the body, which could be called embalming fluid by virtue of being a byproduct of the embalming process- but apparently aren't. Chuck Entz (talk) 00:31, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Precisely. Not all embalming fluids are "embalming fluid".  That's how we know that it's idiomatic.  P Aculeius (talk) 02:24, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

 * Delete per User:Pfftallofthemaretaken. DCDuring TALK 02:04, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep using the lemming heuristic: it is in Collins. Furthermore, I see a slang sense in dictionary.reference.com, for which they cite The Dictionary of American Slang, Fourth Edition, 2007; if the slang sense exists, we need the entry anyway. --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:17, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - seems non-SOP to me. Like waiting room, drinking water, sleeping pill etc. The fact that it's not called embalming liquid is an interesting one too. --Zo3rWer (talk) 08:24, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Good examples. You forgot sleeping tablet, which, if the sleep is deep, is also known as a brick. --Dan Polansky (talk) 09:23, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Or dining room, dancing girl, frying pan, cleaning fluid. I could be here all day --Zo3rWer (talk) 09:45, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
 * cycling shorts, eating knife, cleaning fluid, shitting dog, walking boot are all good too. Possibly not shitting dog. --Zo3rWer (talk) 09:55, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep -- Apart from being a fried egg as well as a walking stick in the field of corpse preservation, there are also plenty of certified usages out there to do with "smoking embalming fluid" - "embalming fluid highs" and so on. So, if anyone cares to make an entry for sherm, wetdaddy, or fry stick they will probably want to blue-link to embalming fluid. -- A LGRIF  talk 12:57, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep—if there's a slang sense, then of course. But then the definition should reflect that slang sense. But then it would be weird to have the slang sense and not the definition of the actual thing. So keep. Pfftallofthemaretaken (talk) 19:51, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
 * We have a template,, for that very purpose. So that's not a reasonable rationale for keeping. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 20:05, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
 * But we still need the entry itself for the slang term, if I understand correctly. Sooner or later somebody will write the slang definition. Can somebody please write the slang definition and put an end to this, please?? Pfftallofthemaretaken (talk) 20:27, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

 * Delete per Pfftallofthemaretaken and WikiTiki. re putting embalming fluid in a water gun and failing to embalm living people by squirting them with it: if I put pickling solution into a water gun and squirt it on people, they won't become pickled, but I don't think "pickling solution" (or "pickling liquid") is idiomatic; do you? - -sche (discuss) 22:02, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
 * If it can just as easily be called "pickling solution" or "pickling liquid" (or perhaps, "pickling fluid") then it hasn't become set. bd2412 T 23:27, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep — I do not think this passes the "fried egg" test. It is SOP (i.e. any fluid intended for embalming, whether you put in a water pistol or a bucket). But I'm going to go out on a limb and guess that it's likely a useful translation target, as there's probably a bunch of languages that use a single word for the concept. —Pengo (talk) 05:25, 27 September 2015 (UTC) [Also keep for slang usage, which is not SOP] —Pengo (talk) 12:55, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Re slang terms. The terms I mentioned above are NOT slang terms for embalming fluid, they are joints or cigarretes or cigars etc. which have been soaked in embalming fluid. That is what the anti-drug educational books, articles, and web sites say. I do not feel like writing these entries, but the point is that you can find plenty of quotations of the type "... is made by dipping a cigarette into embalming fluid". This means that authorities understand that "embalming fluid" describes a certain substance that can be abused. (Not just any old fluid that might possibly be injected into a corpse, such as diluted honey). -- A LGRIF  talk 11:32, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Those joints aren't soaked in actual embalming fluid, but in PCP, euphemistically called 'embalming fluid': []. Pfftallofthemaretaken (talk) 13:08, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I have read some articles about this, for ex.[] and see that generally the people (agencies and so on) who write about this subject state that "embalming fluid" means literal embalming fluid, or PCP (as you say), or a mixture of the two. Given that "embalming fluid" in the literature can mean any of three things, i.e. has three definitions, plus we are seeing a use of embalming fluid for something other than embalming, and yet still being referred to as "embalming fluid", i.e. is similar to correction fluid or washing-up liquid, then that means the term complies with CFI rules and conventions. - Keep. - <i>A LGRIF </i ><font color="#FFD700"> talk 16:35, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
 * BD2412, you're not proposing any relevance and I think you're absolutely right not to. Hypothetical points about what something doesn't do aren't good arguments. A brown leaf can't teleport, hence, it's idiomatic? Right. Renard Migrant (talk) 14:56, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Again, apples and oranges. "Brown" is not a gerund, and a "brown leaf" is not a leaf used to "brown" something. Explain why "fruit juice" is idiomatic and you will have answered your own question. <i style="background:lightgreen">bd2412</i> T 16:09, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I really don't think that's a helpful argument. The analogy here is more akin to "correction fluid".  The word is idiomatic because it doesn't apply to just any fluid used for the purpose of correcting anything; water sprayed at unruly dogs may correct their behaviour, but it isn't "correction fluid".  If you apply solvent to ink or paint in order to correct a mistake, it still isn't "correction fluid".  The word doesn't refer to a single formula or set of ingredients; it can be made different ways and doesn't have to look the same; it's not a brand name and can be applied to substances used for a similar purpose from different sources.  The point that BD2412 has been making is that a word can also be determined to be idiomatic because the thing described retains its identity if used in ways not described by its name.  It doesn't cease to be "correction fluid" if you use it for something other than correcting things; if a catcher uses it to paint his nails, it's still "correction fluid", not "nail polish".  So it's not irrelevant at all.  Embalming fluid doesn't refer to "any fluid to which the word 'embalming' might be applied; nor does it cease to be embalming fluid if it's used for something other than embalming.  By contrast, "brown leaf" can refer to any leaf that's brown, with no limitation or exclusion; if it stops being brown, then it's no longer a "brown leaf."  That's why the phrase "brown leaf" is no more than the sum of its parts, while "embalming fluid" is idiomatic.  P Aculeius (talk) 16:25, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
 * That is an excellent analogy, but is actually the contrapositive of what I have been arguing, which is that "embalming fluid" is a fluid that performs the function of embalming only in narrowly defined circumstances. In the same sense, you couldn't throw "correction fluid" on a chronic misspeller and turn them into a correct speller (in fact you generally can't "correct" any mistake by putting correction fluid on it except removing a stray mark). However, both correction fluid and embalming fluid are still called by those names even where they are used in a way that can not lead to the result suggested by their names. <i style="background:lightgreen">bd2412</i> T 17:04, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. Ƿidsiþ 06:53, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep.Sonofcawdrey (talk) 04:19, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep as a useful term. Donnanz (talk) 11:22, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom et al. —msh210℠ (talk) 18:14, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Kept as no consensus. —msh210℠ (talk) 18:14, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

title: Talk:embalming fluid


text: arrojarlo

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: arrojarlo


text: adecuarlo

title: adecuarlo


text: acercarlas

title: acercarlas


text:
accouvage

Noun

 * 1) incubation (of eggs) and subsequent hatching of chicks (in a hatchery)

title: accouvage


text:
boetedoening

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) act of making amends
 * 2) atonement
 * 3) act of serving a sentence

title: boetedoening


text:
accréditeur

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) accrediting

title: accréditeur


text:
accréditif

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) letter of credit

title: accréditif


text: Germaanse

title: Germaanse


text:
sagoy

Noun

 * 1) vagabond, hobo

Adjective

 * 1) wandering, vagabond
 * 2)  (of a person) like having the mental capacity of a crazy homeless man

Noun

 * 1) quick, light touch

title: sagoy


text:
gevangennemen

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to take prisoner

title: gevangennemen


text: accrescents

title: accrescents


text: mirándonos

title: mirándonos


text: perpetuarse

title: perpetuarse


text: tírate

title: tírate


text:
Talk:on the subject of

RFD
Not worthy as a phrasebook addition? ---> Tooironic (talk) 12:13, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
 * A phrasebook addition is only useful if there are translations, of which this entry has none. Are there translations for this concept that could not just as easily be housed at "regarding" or "concerning"? bd2412 T 13:11, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Although it could be more interesting in the form "be on the subject". - "While we are on the subject (of) ..." -- A LGRIF  talk 15:20, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
 * A person whose language proficiency would allow them to have conversations in which this phrase could be used don't need a phrasebook. People who need phrasebooks won't be using this phrase. And why on earth is it 'informal'?? that guy 21:08, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Just doesn't sound right. Delete it. SemperBlotto (talk) 06:28, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, delete. bd2412 T 14:35, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

 * Weak delete; it may be worth noting that we have au sujet de. -- Romanophile ♞ (contributions) 16:05, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Deleted. —msh210℠ (talk) 18:29, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

title: Talk:on the subject of


text:
Talk:they two

RFD
I'm feeling SOP. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 00:15, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

 * I don’t know if there’re any senses that make this construction redundant. I’ve certainly never seen these used together like this. Why is it sum‐of‐parts? -- Romanophile ♞ (contributions) 00:23, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

 * Delete. Evidently SOP. This construction can be used with other numbers ("they three" and "they four" are attested, for instance) and with other pronouns: "we three" is famously used by the witches in Macbeth, "we two" is well attested, and "you two", "you three", etc. are very common even in non-literary contexts. —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 00:36, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

 * I can’t remember the last instance in my life where I heard somebody say ‘they two.’ It just doesn’t sound right to me, like an amateur mistake. Normally people would say ‘those two’ rather than ‘they two’ (at least in my area). I think that it merits a usage note at they, if nothing else. -- Romanophile ♞ (contributions) 02:37, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
 * It's either archaic or obsolete, but it's a syntactic construction, not an idiom. I just spent some time looking for the same construction with other numbers: "they three", "they four", "they five", "they six" and "they seven" all have at least 3 CFI-compliant examples in Google Books, in spite of a substantial number of false positives. There are probably others, but I didn't want to waste any more time looking for them. Chuck Entz (talk) 02:55, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Equinox ◑ 01:33, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

 * Delete. Agreed, sum of parts; no special meaning and not a familiar phrase. P Aculeius (talk) 02:00, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Syntactically archaic, lexically current; transparent. We should no more have this than have the two of them. DCDuring TALK 02:32, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not even necessary as a translation target, since third-person dual pronouns in other languages can be accommodated at they. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 15:51, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
 * And delete. Renard Migrant (talk) 13:39, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Deleted per consensus and arguments here. Cf. talk:us two and WT:Tea room/2012/February. —msh210℠ (talk) 18:40, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

title: Talk:they two


text:
accroche-cœur

Noun

 * 1) kiss curl

title: accroche-cœur


text:
malwares

Usage notes

 * In standard usage, malware is uncountable; the plural might be pieces of malware, malware programs, etc.

title: malwares


text: micropilotes

title: micropilotes


text:
micropilote

Noun

 * 1) micropile

title: micropilote


text: micropiles

title: micropiles


text:
forma-pensamento

Noun

 * 1)  thought-form a manifestation of the thoughts, ideas or emotions of someone

title: forma-pensamento


text:
accroupissement

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) squat, squatting (body position)

title: accroupissement


text: formas-pensamento

title: formas-pensamento


text: traducirse

title: traducirse


text: superarlos

title: superarlos


text: situarlos

title: situarlos


text: secundarle

title: secundarle


text: sacudirnos

title: sacudirnos


text: presentándose

title: presentándose


text: pedirse

title: pedirse


text: instruirla

title: instruirla


text: granjearse

title: granjearse


text: ganársela

title: ganársela


text: enfrentarnos

title: enfrentarnos


text: emitiéndose

title: emitiéndose


text: despellejarse

title: despellejarse


text: defenderla

title: defenderla


text: añadirse

title: añadirse


text:
accusatoire

Etymology
.

Adjective

 * 1)  accusatory

title: accusatoire


text: adaptarnos

title: adaptarnos


text: sustituirle

title: sustituirle


text:
geuzenvlag

Noun

 * 1) small flag consisting of a white erect cross with triangular elements and a diagonal cross with red and blue triangular or trapezoid elements, flown at the bowsprit or stem, associated with geuzen

title: geuzenvlag


text: desbocadas

title: desbocadas


text:
Umbral

Proper noun

 * 1)  a place of suffering for spirits, similar to Hell

title: Umbral


text:
judicializar

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to judicialize

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to judicialize

title: judicializar


text:
geuzelambiek

Etymology
From. Named after the rue des Gueux road in Brussels, where it was first brewed.

Noun

 * 1)  Belgian lambic made by fermenting a blend of young and old lambics

title: geuzelambiek


text:
weerbestendig

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) weather-resistant

title: weerbestendig


text: acérant

title: acérant


text:
acère

Etymology 2
.

Adjective

 * 1)  hornless

title: acère


text: acères

title: acères


text: acérons

title: acérons


text: acérez

title: acérez


text: acèrent

title: acèrent


text: acérais

title: acérais


text: acérait

title: acérait


text: acérions

title: acérions


text:
acérer

Verb

 * 1) to sharpen (a point)

title: acérer


text: acériez

title: acériez


text: acéraient

title: acéraient


text: acérai

title: acérai


text: acéras

title: acéras


text: acéra

title: acéra


text: acérâmes

title: acérâmes


text: acérâtes

title: acérâtes


text: acérèrent

title: acérèrent


text: acérerai

title: acérerai


text: acèrerai

title: acèrerai


text: acéreras

title: acéreras


text: acèreras

title: acèreras


text: acérera

title: acérera


text: acèrera

title: acèrera


text: acérerons

title: acérerons


text: acèrerons

title: acèrerons


text: acérerez

title: acérerez


text: acèrerez

title: acèrerez


text: acéreront

title: acéreront


text: acèreront

title: acèreront


text: acérerais

title: acérerais


text: acèrerais

title: acèrerais


text: acérerait

title: acérerait


text: acèrerait

title: acèrerait


text: acérerions

title: acérerions


text: acèrerions

title: acèrerions


text: acéreriez

title: acéreriez


text: acèreriez

title: acèreriez


text: acéreraient

title: acéreraient


text: acèreraient

title: acèreraient


text: partidarias

title: partidarias


text: acérasse

title: acérasse


text: acérasses

title: acérasses


text: acérât

title: acérât


text: acérassions

title: acérassions


text: acérassiez

title: acérassiez


text: acérassent

title: acérassent


text: replantearse

title: replantearse


text: meterlos

title: meterlos


text: cuestionarse

title: cuestionarse


text: cumplirlo

title: cumplirlo


text:
wenskaart

Noun

 * 1) postcard to express wishes

title: wenskaart


text: acescentes

title: acescentes


text: kandidatene

title: kandidatene


text: achaine

title: achaine


text:
werelds

Adjective

 * 1) worldly

title: werelds


text:
achalasie

Noun

 * 1)  achalasia

title: achalasie


text:
acharisme

Noun

 * 1)  Ash'arism

title: acharisme


text:
kerstfuif

Noun

 * 1) Christmas party

title: kerstfuif


text: kandidatar

title: kandidatar


text: kandidatane

title: kandidatane


text:
User:WikiWikiWayne

Home wiki:

title: User:WikiWikiWayne


text:
User talk:WikiWikiWayne

Home wiki:

Gehrig
I've removed a bunch of the empty categories and crud from this page; it could use some expansion, but within the lines of how we format entries here. WT:WFW might be of some use to you, and I've appended the standard welcome message below.

Welcome!

Hello, welcome to Wiktionary, and thank you for your contributions so far.

If you are unfamiliar with wiki editing, take a look at Help:How to edit a page. It is a concise list of technical guidelines to the wiki format we use here: how to, for example, make text boldfaced or create hyperlinks. Feel free to practice in the sandbox. If you would like a slower introduction we have a short tutorial.

These links may help you familiarize yourself with Wiktionary:

 * Entry layout (EL) is a detailed policy documenting how Wiktionary pages should be formatted. All entries should conform to this standard. The easiest way to start off is to copy the contents of an existing page for a similar word, and then adapt it to fit the entry you are creating.
 * Our Criteria for inclusion (CFI) define exactly which words can be added to Wiktionary, though it may be a bit technical and longwinded. The most important part is that Wiktionary only accepts words that have been in somewhat widespread use over the course of at least a year, and citations that demonstrate usage can be asked for when there is doubt.
 * If you already have some experience with editing our sister project Wikipedia, then you may find our guide for Wikipedia users useful.
 * The FAQ aims to answer most of your remaining questions, and there are several help pages that you can browse for more information.
 * A glossary of our technical jargon, and some hints for dealing with the more common communication issues.
 * If you have anything to ask about or suggest, we have several discussion rooms. Feel free to ask any other editors in person if you have any problems or question, by posting a message on their talk page.

You are encouraged to add a BabelBox to your userpage. This shows which languages you know, so other editors know which languages you'll be working on, and what they can ask you for help with.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wiktionarian! If you have any questions, bring them to the Information desk, or ask me on my talk page. If you do so, please sign your posts with four tildes: ~ which automatically produces your username and the current date and time.

Again, welcome! —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 03:14, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

 * User:Metaknowledge. I did not just fall off the turnip truck. My entry was for the most part properly formatted. I was still working on it when you interjected your edits. Cheers! Checkingfax (talk) 06:14, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
 * A good way to avoid an issue like this in future would be to use the 'Preview' function, which allows you see how a partially completed page looks before you add it to the site. (Also, your ping didn't work — it has to be applied in the same edit as when you add your signature.) —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 17:15, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

 * . I did use Preview and was happy with the way it looked. I was in the middle of refining things when you deleted all the sections I had populated my entry with. I refreshed the ping which usually works. No big-ee. Cheers! Checkingfax (talk) 05:17, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Redirects
Please don't create redirects like you did at Endonym. If you look at Exonym, you'll see why: we're not just an English dictionary, and other languages have different capitalization rules. There are also plenty of cases where other languages have words spelled the same as common English words- my personal favorite is Indonesian, which means water. About the only thing that's safe for redirects is English phrases, and even those might have an exception or two. Chuck Entz (talk) 02:08, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

title: User talk:WikiWikiWayne


text:
specialiteit

Etymology
Borrowed from. Equivalent to.

Noun

 * 1) specialty
 * 2)  specialist

title: specialiteit


text:
reherser

Verb

 * 1) to repeat word-for-word, such as a pledge

title: reherser


text:
reguierdon

Noun

 * 1) reward

title: reguierdon


text:
reguerdoner

Verb

 * 1) to reward

title: reguerdoner


text:
regraterie

Noun

 * 1) regratery

title: regraterie


text:
nazianzenus

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) of or pertaining to Nazianzus; Nazianzen

title: nazianzenus


text:
Fikkie

Proper noun

 * 1) clichéd name for a dog, Rover

title: Fikkie


text:
Citations:fait accompli

Noun

 * 1906, Anthony Trollope, Barchester Towers, Chapter XLVII. The Dean Elect
 * Mr. Quiverful's appointment to the hospital was, however, a fait accompli, and Mr. Harding's acquiescence in that appointment was not less so.

 * 1913, Saki, When William Came, Chapter VII
 * “In quarters where the fait accompli is an object of solicitude,” said Yeovil.

title: Citations:fait accompli


text: choot pattern

title: choot pattern


text:
ஜலம்

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) water

title: ஜலம்


text:
aguy

Interjection

 * 1) an expression of one's own physical pain
 * 2) ouch!

title: aguy


text:
apennoot

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  peanut

title: apennoot


text:
agay

Interjection

 * 1) ouch;

Noun

 * 1) friend a term of address used between friends of the same sex or with one's spouse or close relative

Interjection

 * 1) an expression of surprise

Pronoun

 * 1) me

title: agay


text:
kokak

Etymology
.

Interjection

 * : ribbit

Noun

 * 1) croak; ribbit

Etymology
from the croak of frogs.

Interjection

 * 1) ribbit

Noun

 * 1) croak
 * 2)  prostitute; whore
 * 3)  frog; toad

title: kokak


text:
tuktugaok

Etymology
.

Interjection

 * 1) cock-a-doodle-doo!

Noun

 * 1) cock-a-doodle-doo

Etymology
.

Interjection

 * 1) cock-a-doodle-doo!

Noun

 * 1) cock-a-doodle-doo

title: tuktugaok


text:
-hovda

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) -headed (having such a head)

title: -hovda


text: Category:Irish terms inherited from Primitive Irish


text: Category:Terms inherited from Primitive Irish


text:
lagay

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) bribe

Noun

 * 1)  testicle

Usage notes

 * This word is part of Cebuano–Tagalog false friends. The Tagalog definitions can be seen at lagay.

Etymology 2
Possibly borrowed from

Verb

 * 1) to bribe

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) bribe

Etymology
Compare 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) act of putting or placing something on or in a certain place, application, putting on
 * 2) state; condition
 * 3) the manner by which a thing is placed or set up
 * 4) position; place; location
 * 5) lot; piece
 * 6) depositing of money
 * 7) appearance
 * 8)  bribe; bribery
 * 9)  bet in gambling
 * 1) depositing of money
 * 2) appearance
 * 3)  bribe; bribery
 * 4)  bet in gambling
 * 1)  bribe; bribery
 * 2)  bet in gambling
 * 1)  bet in gambling
 * 1)  bet in gambling
 * 1)  bet in gambling

Noun

 * 1) mud; mire

title: lagay


text:
baardaap

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  the lion-tailed macaque
 * 2)  someone with a (large) beard
 * 1)  someone with a (large) beard

title: baardaap


text:
tűzvédelem

Noun

 * 1) fire protection

title: tűzvédelem


text: Wiktionary:Foreign Word of the Day/2015/October 25


text: Wiktionary:Foreign Word of the Day/2015/October 26


text:
tűzvédelmi

Adjective

 * 1) fire-protection, fire-control

title: tűzvédelmi


text: Wiktionary:Foreign Word of the Day/2015/October 27


text: Wiktionary:Foreign Word of the Day/2015/October 28


text: Wiktionary:Foreign Word of the Day/2015/October 29


text: Wiktionary:Foreign Word of the Day/2015/October 30


text: Wiktionary:Foreign Word of the Day/2015/October 31


text:
pulong

Noun

 * 1) word

Noun

 * 1) meeting; conference; forum

Noun

 * 1) word

title: pulong


text:
átlátható

Adjective

 * 1) transparent, clear

title: átlátható


text:
ugyanitt

Adverb

 * 1) here, right here (at this same place)

title: ugyanitt


text:
bangaw

Etymology 1
Compare.

Noun

 * 1) buffet; party; feast

Noun

 * 1) rainbow

Usage notes

 * This is part of Cebuano–Tagalog false friends. The Tagalog definitions can be seen at bangaw.

Noun

 * 1) owl

Noun

 * 1) buffet; food served at feasts; food for the public

Etymology 1
From, from , from.

Noun

 * 1) blowfly
 * 2) botfly; horsefly

Usage notes

 * This is part of Tagalog–Cebuano false friends. The Cebuano definitions can be seen at bangaw.

Etymology
From balangaw.

Noun

 * 1) rainbow

title: bangaw


text: torneiras

title: torneiras


text: bumped off

title: bumped off


text: bumps off

title: bumps off


text: bumping off

title: bumping off


text:
altos e baixos

Noun

 * 1) ups and downs periods of positive and negative events, moods, etc.

title: altos e baixos


text: Category:Northern Sami terms suffixed with -us


text: rubs off on

title: rubs off on


text: rubbing off on

title: rubbing off on


text: rubbed off on

title: rubbed off on


text:
Thread:User talk:CodeCat/Parsing nl-verbs templates using a bot

Hello CodeCat,

I'm trying to parse Dutch verbs which use the module nl-verbs (https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Module:nl-verbs). However, the module generates quite a lot more information than is given to it and it would take some more than a couple lines of code to mimic it. It outputs HTML as a default which I could parse but this is a bit tedious. When searching through the source I saw the bot parameter (args["bot"]) being used to switch the output to a computer readable format. After lots of trying and searching I wasn't able to pass the parameter without an error message being thrown at me (https://en.wiktionary.org/w/api.php?action=expandtemplates&text=). After asking for help on the pywikibot IRC someone said that this could be due to some edit which restricts the parameters being passed: https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=Module:nl-verbs&diff=32813469&oldid=32813334. As you can see, the bot key is missing in the newly defined params table (is that what you call an array in Lua?).

MewBot is also using this parameter to parse the templates: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/User:MewBot/nlverbformbot.py (look for: params["bot"] = "1") I would guess that your bot isn't fully functional or that I have found deprecated code or something.

Anyhow, could you help me get this parameter to work again. I'm not quite experienced in using Wiktionary/other wikis in this way and I would not like to mess something up that is used accross so many pages.

Thanks in advance.


text:
ráhkis

Etymology
Borrowed from.

Adjective

 * 1) dear, beloved

title: ráhkis


text:
Thread:User talk:CodeCat/Parsing nl-verbs templates using a bot/reply

I added the parameter but I don't know if it will work now.


text:
upahan

Verb

 * 1) to mate, to copulate

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to rent; to lease (a vehicle, house, etc.)
 * 2) to hire; to employ (someone)
 * 1) to hire; to employ (someone)

Adjective

 * 1) paid for services rendered

Noun

 * 1) wage earner
 * 2) usual rate of wages paid to ordinary workers

title: upahan


text:
ráhkistuvvat

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to fall in love

title: ráhkistuvvat


text: Category:Northern Sami terms suffixed with -uvvat


text: dampened off

title: dampened off


text: dampens off

title: dampens off


text: dampening off

title: dampening off


text: epileptologists

title: epileptologists


text: -uvvat

title: -uvvat


text:
Thread:User talk:CodeCat/Parsing nl-verbs templates using a bot/reply (2)

Because the wrongly formatted url in my message now shows a nice list I thing it did.

Thanks!


text:
farinograph

Noun

 * 1) A device for measuring properties of flour mixed with water, such as its shear and viscosity.

title: farinograph


text: farinographs

title: farinographs


text:
farinography

Noun

 * 1) The measurement of the properties of flour using a farinograph.

title: farinography


text:
farinographic

Adjective

 * 1) Relating to farinography.

title: farinographic


text:
hyposensitive

Adjective

 * 1) Having abnormally low sensitivity.

title: hyposensitive


text:
unconcordant

Adjective

 * 1) Not concordant; not agreeing or harmonizing with something else.

title: unconcordant


text:
suvrris

Adjective

 * 1) sour, acid

title: suvrris


text:
prehospitally

Adverb

 * 1) Before a patient's admission to hospital.

title: prehospitally


text: do of

title: do of


text:
suvri

Noun

 * 1) acid

title: suvri


text:
dioicy

Noun

 * 1) The state of being dioicous.

title: dioicy


text:
monoicy

Noun

 * 1) The state of being monoicous.

title: monoicy


text: hip hip hoorah

title: hip hip hoorah


text:
microeconomist

Noun

 * 1) One who studies microeconomics.

title: microeconomist


text: microeconomists

title: microeconomists


text: goofed off

title: goofed off


text: goofs off

title: goofs off


text:
radiolike

Adjective

 * 1) Resembling or characteristic of radio.

title: radiolike


text:
hormoonverstoorder

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) endocrine disruptor

title: hormoonverstoorder


text:
um belo dia

Etymology
lit. 'one beautiful day'. This can usually be understood as meaning simply, with the word included as filler text.

title: um belo dia


text: Oskárek

title: Oskárek


text:
Talk:mixtape

I have an inkling that the term is now used for similar collections of songs even in non-tape media, e.g. digital files. May be worth looking into. Equinox ◑ 15:35, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

title: Talk:mixtape


text: Michálek

title: Michálek


text: Lojzík

title: Lojzík


text: Lojza

title: Lojza


text:
Citations:surt.

 * 1934,, , Paris: Hachette, page 229/3 s.v. “brūtum”:
 * brūtum, i, n. [surt. au pl.], bête brute: Sen. Ep. 121, 4.

title: Citations:surt.


text:
scissor door

Noun

 * 1) An automobile door that rotates vertically at a fixed hinge at the front of the door, rather than outward as with a conventional door.

Translations

 * Finnish: saksiovi
 * German: Scherentür
 * Italian: portiera a forbice

title: scissor door


text: scissor doors

title: scissor doors


text: Liborek

title: Liborek


text: kiss curls

title: kiss curls


text: Lubošek

title: Lubošek


text: Lukášek

title: Lukášek


text: Category:pt:Cities in Germany

title: Category:pt:Cities in Germany


text: Lumírek

title: Lumírek


text: Luďa

title: Luďa


text: Kryštůfek

title: Kryštůfek


text: Karlík

title: Karlík


text: Karlíček

title: Karlíček


text: Milánek

title: Milánek


text: Mareček

title: Mareček


text: Martínek

title: Martínek


text: Pavlíček

title: Pavlíček


text:
subplan

Noun

 * 1) A plan (strategy or scheme) forming part of a larger plan.

title: subplan


text: subplans

title: subplans


text: Pavlík

title: Pavlík


text: Petříček

title: Petříček


text: Petřík

title: Petřík


text: Robertek

title: Robertek


text: Řehořek

title: Řehořek


text:
Tomášek

Etymology
From.

title: Tomášek


text: Šimůnek

title: Šimůnek


text: Rudolfek

title: Rudolfek


text: Zdeněček

title: Zdeněček


text: Zbyněček

title: Zbyněček


text: Arnoštek

title: Arnoštek


text: Arturek

title: Arturek


text: Evženek

title: Evženek


text: Filípek

title: Filípek


text: Ivánek

title: Ivánek


text: Jakoubek

title: Jakoubek


text: Jiříček

title: Jiříček


text: Jiřík

title: Jiřík


text: Bertík

title: Bertík


text: Bedříšek

title: Bedříšek


text: Béďa

title: Béďa


text: Bohouš

title: Bohouš


text: Bohuš

title: Bohuš


text: Bořík

title: Bořík


text:
malufista

Adjective

 * 1)  of  (born 1931), the 25th governor in the state of São Paulo, Brazil

title: malufista


text: malufistas

title: malufistas


text:
Franta

Etymology
Borrowed from.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Franta is the 40204th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 545 individuals. Franta is most common among White (96.15%) individuals.

title: Franta


text: chess clocks

title: chess clocks


text: Fráňa

title: Fráňa


text: Fanouš

title: Fanouš


text: Čenda

title: Čenda


text: Břeťa

title: Břeťa


text:
melhor idade

Etymology
lit. 'best age'.

A play on the word.

Noun

 * 1)  old age

title: melhor idade


text:
deoligarchization

Etymology
1969,.

Noun

 * 1) A process or act of democratization by removing oligarchs or lessening their political power.

title: deoligarchization


text: Jarda

title: Jarda


text: Jára

title: Jára


text: Igorek

title: Igorek


text: Kája

title: Kája


text: Láďa

title: Láďa


text: Ludva

title: Ludva


text: Míša

title: Míša


text: Category:Czech diminutives of female given names


text: Míla

title: Míla


text:
mofle

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1)  muffler part of exhaust pipe

title: mofle


text: mofles

title: mofles


text:
Talk:footway

Apparently, in UK law, a footway runs alongside the carriageway (so includes pavements beside the road) while a footpath doesn't. I saw that here: Equinox ◑ 16:54, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

title: Talk:footway


text: Category:nb:Snakes

title: Category:nb:Snakes


text: Category:nn:Snakes

title: Category:nn:Snakes


text:
sipariş

Etymology
, from. Cognate with 🇨🇬,.

Noun

 * 1) order

title: sipariş


text:
Ota

Etymology
Transliteration of. The name of the ward of Tokyo comes from the first and last characters of and, respectively.

Etymology
.

title: Ota


text: Otík

title: Otík


text:
pãsturã

Etymology
Probably from, from. Alternatively from a, diminutive of. Compare 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) digested food (such as grass) found in the stomach of an animal

title: pãsturã


text: Oťas

title: Oťas


text: Přemek

title: Přemek


text: Přema

title: Přema


text: Rosťa

title: Rosťa


text: Ríša

title: Ríša


text:
Talk:tortoise

Citation for ancient Greek reference
Shouldn't there be some kind of citation to corroborate the claim that ancient Greeks believed tortoises came from the underworld? It's not part of the wikipedia article either so... 142.161.57.230 17:11, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Sanskrit translation
Needed: Sanskrit translation. 173.89.236.187 21:15, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Done. 173.89.236.187 21:18, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:tortoise


text:
pãshuni

Etymology
From, from. Compare 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) pasture, grazing ground

title: pãshuni


text:
chapa-branca

Etymology
From. Derived from the use of white licensing plates, reserved for government authorities.

Adjective

 * 1)  blindly serving the interests of the government; manipulated by the government

title: chapa-branca


text: Ráďa

title: Ráďa


text: Tonda

title: Tonda


text: Véna

title: Véna


text: Venouš

title: Venouš


text: drepes

title: drepes


text: Váňa

title: Váňa


text: Vašek

title: Vašek


text: Vláďa

title: Vláďa


text: propasábamos

title: propasábamos


text: Zdenda

title: Zdenda


text: propasares

title: propasares


text: propasaréis

title: propasaréis


text: propasó

title: propasó


text: propasaríamos

title: propasaríamos


text: propaso

title: propaso


text: propasaba

title: propasaba


text: propasé

title: propasé


text: propase

title: propase


text: propasase

title: propasase


text: propasaremos

title: propasaremos


text: propasa

title: propasa


text: propasaste

title: propasaste


text: propasabais

title: propasabais


text: propasara

title: propasara


text: propasando

title: propasando


text: propasaren

title: propasaren


text: propasáramos

title: propasáramos


text: propasan

title: propasan


text: propases

title: propases


text: propaséis

title: propaséis


text: propasen

title: propasen


text: propasaras

title: propasaras


text: propasáremos

title: propasáremos


text: propasaran

title: propasaran


text: propasas

title: propasas


text: propasarías

title: propasarías


text: propasareis

title: propasareis


text: propasare

title: propasare


text: propasases

title: propasases


text: propasará

title: propasará


text: propasaseis

title: propasaseis


text: propasarán

title: propasarán


text: propasarais

title: propasarais


text: propasaríais

title: propasaríais


text: propasaré

title: propasaré


text: propasarás

title: propasarás


text: propasamos

title: propasamos


text: propasasen

title: propasasen


text: propasáis

title: propasáis


text: Vojta

title: Vojta


text: propasarían

title: propasarían


text: propasaría

title: propasaría


text: propasabas

title: propasabas


text: propasaron

title: propasaron


text: propasásemos

title: propasásemos


text: propasemos

title: propasemos


text: propasad

title: propasad


text: propasaban

title: propasaban


text: propasasteis

title: propasasteis


text: propasado

title: propasado


text: propasada

title: propasada


text: propasados

title: propasados


text: propasadas

title: propasadas


text: Standa

title: Standa


text:
Pepa

Proper noun

 * 1)  the, the first constitution of Spain
 * 1)  the, the first constitution of Spain

title: Pepa


text: Olda

title: Olda


text:
lionhead

Noun

 * 1) A lionhead rabbit.
 * 2) A lionhead cichlid.

title: lionhead


text: lionheads

title: lionheads