text: doctoravisti

title: doctoravisti


text: doctoravit

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: doctoravit


text: doctoravimus

title: doctoravimus


text: doctoravistis

title: doctoravistis


text: doctoraverunt

title: doctoraverunt


text: doctoravero

title: doctoravero


text: doctoraveris

title: doctoraveris


text: doctoraverit

title: doctoraverit


text: doctoraverimus

title: doctoraverimus


text: doctoraveritis

title: doctoraveritis


text: doctoraverint

title: doctoraverint


text: doctoraveram

title: doctoraveram


text: doctoraveras

title: doctoraveras


text: doctoraverat

title: doctoraverat


text: doctoraveramus

title: doctoraveramus


text: doctoraveratis

title: doctoraveratis


text: doctoraverant

title: doctoraverant


text: doctoror

title: doctoror


text: doctoraris

title: doctoraris


text: doctoramur

title: doctoramur


text: doctoramini

title: doctoramini


text: doctoratur

title: doctoratur


text: doctorantur

title: doctorantur


text: doctorabor

title: doctorabor


text: doctoraberis

title: doctoraberis


text: doctorabimur

title: doctorabimur


text: doctorabimini

title: doctorabimini


text: doctorabitur

title: doctorabitur


text: doctorabuntur

title: doctorabuntur


text: doctorabar

title: doctorabar


text: doctorabaris

title: doctorabaris


text: doctorabamur

title: doctorabamur


text: doctorabamini

title: doctorabamini


text: doctorabatur

title: doctorabatur


text: doctorabantur

title: doctorabantur


text: doctoret

title: doctoret


text: doctoremus

title: doctoremus


text: doctoretis

title: doctoretis


text: doctorent

title: doctorent


text: doctorarem

title: doctorarem


text: doctoraret

title: doctoraret


text: doctoraremus

title: doctoraremus


text: doctoraretis

title: doctoraretis


text: doctorarent

title: doctorarent


text: doctoraverim

title: doctoraverim


text: doctoravissem

title: doctoravissem


text: doctoravisses

title: doctoravisses


text: doctoravisset

title: doctoravisset


text: doctoravissemus

title: doctoravissemus


text: doctoravissetis

title: doctoravissetis


text: doctoravissent

title: doctoravissent


text: doctoreris

title: doctoreris


text: doctoremur

title: doctoremur


text: doctoremini

title: doctoremini


text: doctoretur

title: doctoretur


text: doctorentur

title: doctorentur


text: doctorarer

title: doctorarer


text: doctorareris

title: doctorareris


text: doctoraremur

title: doctoraremur


text: doctoraremini

title: doctoraremini


text: doctoraretur

title: doctoraretur


text: doctorarentur

title: doctorarentur


text: doctorato

title: doctorato


text: doctoratote

title: doctoratote


text: doctoranto

title: doctoranto


text: doctorator

title: doctorator


text: doctorantor

title: doctorantor


text: doctoravisse

title: doctoravisse


text: doctorari

title: doctorari


text: doctoratum

title: doctoratum


text: doctoratu

title: doctoratu


text: dogmatizandi

title: dogmatizandi


text: dogmatizando

title: dogmatizando


text: dogmatizandum

title: dogmatizandum


text: dogmatizatum

title: dogmatizatum


text: dogmatizatu

title: dogmatizatu


text: dolitum

title: dolitum


text: dolitu

title: dolitu


text:
увлажнитель

Noun

 * 1) humidifier, moisturizer, humectant

title: увлажнитель


text: dolandi

title: dolandi


text: dolandum

title: dolandum


text: dolatu

title: dolatu


text:
dominatu

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to dominate

title: dominatu


text:
User:HisRuntyDogma

I just add little bits as it pleases me, mostly quotes.

title: User:HisRuntyDogma


text: domuisse

title: domuisse


text: domandum

title: domandum


text: domitu

title: domitu


text: donatu

title: donatu


text: dormitum

title: dormitum


text: dormitu

title: dormitu


text: dormiscis

title: dormiscis


text: dormiscit

title: dormiscit


text: dormiscimus

title: dormiscimus


text: dormiscitis

title: dormiscitis


text: dormiscunt

title: dormiscunt


text: dormiscam

title: dormiscam


text: dormisces

title: dormisces


text: dormiscet

title: dormiscet


text: dormiscemus

title: dormiscemus


text: dormiscetis

title: dormiscetis


text: dormiscent

title: dormiscent


text: dormiscebam

title: dormiscebam


text: dormiscebas

title: dormiscebas


text: dormiscebat

title: dormiscebat


text: dormiscebamus

title: dormiscebamus


text: dormiscebatis

title: dormiscebatis


text: dormiscebant

title: dormiscebant


text: dormiscas

title: dormiscas


text: dormiscat

title: dormiscat


text: dormiscamus

title: dormiscamus


text: dormiscatis

title: dormiscatis


text: dormiscant

title: dormiscant


text: dormiscerem

title: dormiscerem


text: dormisceres

title: dormisceres


text: dormisceret

title: dormisceret


text: dormisceremus

title: dormisceremus


text: dormisceretis

title: dormisceretis


text: dormiscerent

title: dormiscerent


text: dormisce

title: dormisce


text: dormiscito

title: dormiscito


text: dormiscite

title: dormiscite


text: dormiscitote

title: dormiscitote


text: dormiscunto

title: dormiscunto


text: dormiscere

title: dormiscere


text: dormiscisse

title: dormiscisse


text: dormiscendi

title: dormiscendi


text: dormiscendo

title: dormiscendo


text: dormiscendum

title: dormiscendum


text: dormitandi

title: dormitandi


text: dormitandum

title: dormitandum


text: dormitatum

title: dormitatum


text: dormitatu

title: dormitatu


text: dotatu

title: dotatu


text: dubitatu

title: dubitatu


text: dulcescisse

title: dulcescisse


text: dulcescendi

title: dulcescendi


text: dulcescendo

title: dulcescendo


text: dulcescendum

title: dulcescendum


text: dulcificandi

title: dulcificandi


text: dulcificandum

title: dulcificandum


text: dulcificatum

title: dulcificatum


text: dulcificatu

title: dulcificatu


text: dulcandi

title: dulcandi


text: dulcando

title: dulcando


text: dulcandum

title: dulcandum


text: dulcatum

title: dulcatum


text: dulcatu

title: dulcatu


text:
burdus

Etymology
, likely. Cognate of 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Adjective

 * 1) brusque, blunt

title: burdus


text: dulcorandi

title: dulcorandi


text: dulcorando

title: dulcorando


text: dulcorandum

title: dulcorandum


text: dulcoratum

title: dulcoratum


text: dulcoratu

title: dulcoratu


text:
klesskift

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) a change of clothes
 * 2) * Det var kaldt, og hun tørket seg varm med håndkleet og tok på seg det andre klesskiftet hun hadde med. It was cold, and she dried herself warm with the towel and put on the other change of clothes she had with her.

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) a change of clothes

title: klesskift


text: duplicatu

title: duplicatu


text: durescendi

title: durescendi


text: durescendo

title: durescendo


text: durescendum

title: durescendum


text: duratu

title: duratu


text:
Template:Dipodidae Hypernyms

 * Myomorpha - suborder; Dipodoidea - superfamily; Dipodidae - family

title: Template:Dipodidae Hypernyms


text:
Template:Dipodidae Hypernyms/documentation

This is a typing shortcut intended for use under the Hypernyms header of taxa under Dipodidae. It can also be used with subst:.


text:
kurtisan

Etymology
, from.

Noun

 * 1) courtesan:
 * 2) A prostitute, especially one with high-status or wealthy clients.
 * 3) The mistress of a royal or noble.

title: kurtisan


text:
帰宅

Etymology
Compound of.

Noun

 * 1) returning home

Verb

 * 1) return home

title: 帰宅


text:
लपट

Noun

 * 1) flame, blaze

title: लपट


text:
обогреватель

Noun

 * 1) heater

title: обогреватель


text: Template:tea room

title: Template:tea room


text:
ਅੱਗ

Etymology
Ultimately from. , a learned borrowing.

Noun

 * 1) fire, flame
 * 2)  passion, desire

title: ਅੱਗ


text: klesskiftet

title: klesskiftet


text:
doctorans

Etymology
Present participle of

title: doctorans


text:
doctoraturus

Etymology
Future active participle of

title: doctoraturus


text:
doctoratus

Etymology 1
From.

Noun

 * 1)  doctorate, the degree of a doctor

Etymology 2
Perfect passive participle of.

Participle

 * 1)  awarded with a doctorate

title: doctoratus


text:
dogmatizans

Etymology
Present participle of

Participle

 * 1) spreading (ideas, teachings, dogmas...)

title: dogmatizans


text:
ਆਧਾਰ

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) food, nourishment

title: ਆਧਾਰ


text:
dogmatizaturus

Etymology
Future active participle of

title: dogmatizaturus


text:
dogmatizatus

Etymology
Perfect passive participle of

title: dogmatizatus


text:
dogmatizandus

Etymology
Future passive participle of

title: dogmatizandus


text:
doliturus

Etymology
Future active participle of

Participle

 * 1) To be about to suffer (physical pain)
 * 2) To be about to grieve for

title: doliturus


text:
dolans

Etymology
Present participle of

title: dolans


text:
dolaturus

Etymology
Future active participle of

title: dolaturus


text:
dolandus

Etymology
Future passive participle of

title: dolandus


text:
dominaturus

Etymology
Future active participle of

Participle

 * 1) which is to be dominated or ruled by

title: dominaturus


text:
domans

Etymology
Present participle of

Participle

 * 1) Taming, breaking
 * 2) Subduing, conquering, vanquishing

title: domans


text:
domiturus

Etymology
Future active participle of

title: domiturus


text: domandus

title: domandus


text:
dormiscens

Etymology
Present participle of

title: dormiscens


text:
dormitans

Etymology
Present participle of

Participle

 * 1) sleeping

title: dormitans


text:
dormitaturus

Etymology
Future active participle of

title: dormitaturus


text:
dormitatus

Etymology
Perfect passive participle of

title: dormitatus


text:
dormitandus

Etymology
Future passive participle of

title: dormitandus


text:
dulcescens

Etymology
Present participle of

Participle

 * 1) becoming sweet

title: dulcescens


text:
dulcificans

Etymology
Present participle of

Participle

 * 1) making sweet, sweetening

title: dulcificans


text:
dulcificaturus

Etymology
Future active participle of

title: dulcificaturus


text:
dulcificatus

Etymology
Perfect passive participle of

title: dulcificatus


text:
dulcificandus

Etymology
Future passive participle of

title: dulcificandus


text:
dulcans

Etymology
Present participle of

Participle

 * 1) sweetening

title: dulcans


text:
dulcaturus

Etymology
Future active participle of

Participle

 * 1) about to sweeten, going to sweeten

title: dulcaturus


text:
dulcatus

Etymology
Perfect passive participle of

Participle

 * 1) having been sweetened

title: dulcatus


text:
dulcandus

Etymology
Future passive participle of

Participle

 * 1) to be sweetened

title: dulcandus


text:
dulcorans

Etymology
Present participle of

Participle

 * 1) sweetening

title: dulcorans


text:
dulcoraturus

Etymology
Future active participle of

title: dulcoraturus


text:
dulcoratus

Etymology
Perfect passive participle of

title: dulcoratus


text:
dulcorandus

Etymology
Future passive participle of

title: dulcorandus


text:
durescens

Etymology
Present participle of

title: durescens


text:
ਜ਼ਨਾਨੀ

Etymology
, from. Ultimately from (whence 🇨🇬).

Noun

 * 1)  a woman, female human
 * 2)  wife

title: ਜ਼ਨਾਨੀ


text:
ਜੂੰ

Etymology
From. Compare 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) louse

title: ਜੂੰ


text: klesskiftene

title: klesskiftene


text:
Talk:J-Lo

RFD
A bunch from a banned sock of WF (I guess?), these don't meet CFI do they? J-Lo, K-Stew, Scar-Jo, Sam-Cam, Li-Lo, Posh and Becks, Le-Le, Ri-Ri, Su-Bo, A-Rod, K-Rod, R-Pattz

 * also, WaPo? - TheDaveRoss 05:46, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Either way, this list should also include J-Law. bd2412 T 13:26, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Of course they meet CFI, why wouldn't they? He even asked first. Keep all. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 07:20, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Relevant: Tea_room/2015/August —suzukaze (t・c) 07:26, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * We have many abbreviations of terms, such as names of organizations, which terms we choose to exclude. DCDuring TALK 14:16, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Which is a mistake IMO. Pur ple back pack 89  16:51, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

 * Keep all they all pass CFI. Just because they were created by a semi-crazed sock doesn't mean they have to be deleted. Pur ple back pack 89   16:51, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I can't see a compelling reason to delete them. (BTW, not all are celebrities, or individuals: Led Zep, Apop, Codies.) To me they are no worse (and perhaps less bad) than e.g. Einstein being defined as a specific person (Albert) who bore that surname. Equinox ◑ 16:53, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * It isn't totally clear to me how these meet the CFI, nicknames are certainly not specifically addressed, they aren't "given names" in the sense that I read it. Tabloid papers generate dozens of these types of names on a weekly basis.  Is notability of the subject a factor?  How about nicknames for celebrity couples (Brangelina)?  How about buildings (the House that Ruth Built)?  How about nicknames for fictional characters (the Boy Who Lived)?  It seems to me that if we aren't going to include Kristen Stewart we ought not include KStew. - TheDaveRoss 19:57, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Which part of CFI do you think they fail? AFAICS, they are governed by WT:NSE. --Dan Polansky (talk) 19:59, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I suppose. Just a failure of the CFI. - TheDaveRoss 20:02, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * WT:NSE gives you a discretion: "Among those that do meet that requirement, many should be excluded while some should be included, but there is no agreement on precise, all-encompassing rules for deciding which are which. However, policies exist for names of certain kinds of entities."
 * Thus, you can figure out the reason for which they should be excluded, present the reason, and try to convince other editors to support their deletion. --Dan Polansky (talk) 20:16, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * One of the quirks of CFI as currently written is that abbreviations or nicknames tend to almost always pass CFI, even if the things they would abbreviate would not (My personal remedy to this is to allow anything with an abbreviation that passes CFI be allowed to also pass CFI). Pur ple back pack 89  22:40, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

 * Delete all. Let's clear up one thing first. We include certain names like Einstein, Napoleon, and Benedict Arnold because they are used to describe others with characteristics associated with the original person, not because they are used to identify the person. Unless we have citations to the use of J-Lo in the sense of describing somebody other than Jennifer Lopez as "a J-Lo", then including this is no different than including any celebrity known by a mononym (Cher, Björk, Bono, Sting). bd2412 T 14:13, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Did you look at Einstein and Napoleon? Compare the proper and common nouns there. Equinox ◑ 14:21, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I had thought we only included the proper noun versions because they also have the common noun usage. In the same way that it is acceptable to include a non-idiomatic definition in addition to an idiomatic definition if a term is used both ways. - TheDaveRoss 14:25, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep all (all words in all languages) and add Cher, Björk, Bono, Sting. SemperBlotto (talk) 14:20, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Are the nominated forms actually words, though? Take J-Lo, for example. J as used here is a first-initial abbreviation for a name starting with "J", in the same way that the J in J. R. R. Tolkien is a first-initial abbreviation for John. Lo is being used as an abbreviation for Lopez. In theory, a John Lopez or a Jessica Lowell could just as easily be called J-Lo. The fact that a unit combines abbreviated forms with a hyphen can not itself be a reason for inclusion, or we would have an entry for every attested hyphenated surname combination (Johnson-Ferguson, Joyner-Kersee, Baron-Cohen, García-Huidobro, Greiner-Petter-Memm, etc.).
 * An analogous slippery-slope argument can and has been made about MWEs and terms formed by conventional morphology. What makes abbreviation morphology different other than a personal reaction?
 * Most abbreviations are highly context-dependent for their correct-in-context interpretation, eg, DCD, BD, DanP, TDR, SB. What differentiates these, IMO, is that their meaning is much less context dependent. Even I knew 6 of the 13. I might have wanted to know the meaning of the others and would not be able to figure it out for myself very easily. DCDuring TALK 16:52, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I can tell you exactly what makes these kinds of nicknames different from other MWEs: the "[n]o individual person" provision of Criteria for inclusion exists. It may be much easier to figure out the meaning of tennis player from its components than fire engine or red line, but in none of these cases is the meaning derived merely the name of an individual person. Nor do we (or should we) have an entry for The King of Pop, The Queen of Soul, or The Chairman of the Board. bd2412 T 18:11, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I see no slippery slope fallacy. As I understand the bd2412 argument, a proper name consisting of two separate parts and referring to a human individual is more liable to be deleted; Albert Einstein was deleted. Albert Einstein, out of context, uniquely picks a human individual yet that did not save the entry from deletion (although I see no discussion for the entry). J-Lo, out of context, fairly uniquely picks a human individual yet that might not save the entry from deletion, unless one would claim that the hyphen is much more tightly bonding than the space in Albert Einstein. But if hyphen were accepted as tightly bonding for the purpose of "separate components", we might need to keep Johnson-Ferguson, etc. From what I remember, some editors wanted hyphen to be treated as tightly bonding, but there is no established consensus either way, AFAIK, and some hyphenated compounds were deleted, AFAIK. On another note, "No individual person should be listed as a sense in any entry whose page title includes both a given name or diminutive and a family name or patronymic" clearly applies to Albert Einstein but less clearly applies to J-Lo, not because of the hyphen, but because of "Lo" per se being no surname but an abbrev of a surname. But editors could use their policy-granted discretion and vote J-Lo out of wikt, noting that (a) hyphen is not tightly bonding and (b) "Lo" is close enough to being a surname. --Dan Polansky (talk) 18:47, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I often don't read the provisions of pages like CFI very carefully myself, but usually I am called out for it. This time the tables are turned. Here is the most germane passage from CFI:
 * No individual person should be listed as a sense in any entry whose page title includes both a given name or diminutive and a family name or patronymic.
 * I didn't find any other wording which would lead to the exclusion of these names. DCDuring TALK 21:36, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
 * In "J-Lo", J is almost like the given name, and Lo is almost like the family name. I say almost, since they are abbrevs of these. Thus, the quoted regulation seems to almost apply, with emphasis on almost. And I emphasized the policy-granted discretion. So we have a specific regulation that almost applies, and we have a generic regulation that grants a discretion; it is the combination of the two that yields a possible delete vote. But I am repeating myself. Maybe you should read the above posts again. --Dan Polansky (talk) 09:22, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * That would be a self-inflicted cruel and unusual punishment, hence unconstitutional. I was principally responding to BD, who did seem to ignore the exact wording of the text he invoked, and to TDR.
 * DanP's argument hinges on these "almost"s. I find the near-equation in a dictionary of "J" and "Jennifer" preposterous on its face. (Is & "almost" the same as and?) It may well be that the Vote on which the section of CFI was modified was badly drafted, but those words seem to be the applicable ones that we ought live by. As I read the argument all I could really see was a legalistic argument in support of what seems to be an over-arching bias in how we use our discretion: to suit our tastes, not our responsibilities.
 * BTW, JLo would seem attestable in print newspapers. So COALMINE would apply. DCDuring TALK 11:43, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Suppose we were to redefine J-Lo (and JLo) as "an abbreviation for a person whose given name begins with the letter J, and whose surname begins with the syllable Lo"? I don't think we're about to add a sense to Lo for either Lopez or Lohan, but obviously it is used to abbreviate "Lo"- surnames. No doubt we could find copious evidence that "J" is used as an abbreviation for given names starting with "J" (see, e.g., JJ Lin, JR Shaw, JD Alexander, etc.). bd2412 T 13:23, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * The definition "" has pretty much driven out any other meaning of the combination J + Lo. I suppose that the definition proposed would be formally satisfactory, but it would not serve any users without, at least, an especially clause pointing to . DCDuring TALK 14:13, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * We have, at times, made sure that the special cases are reflected in example quotes. I'm sure it would be trivial to find a quote noting that "Jennifer Lopez" is also known as "J-Lo". bd2412 T 14:24, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * For almost any typography of J, L, and O the meaning "" prevents any other definition from gaining traction in general use. Even if one's friend's name were Jean Lomax, using J-Lo to refer to him would have an element of humor in it, IMO. I think the best treatment is one analogous to the use of for idiomatic MWEs: two separate definitions. At some point in the future, should Wiktionary outlast Jennifer Lopez's reputation, the definition would need the label dated. DCDuring TALK  14:39, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * For the record, I am unstriking the nomination since the discussion is still ongoing. --Dan Polansky (talk) 14:28, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
 * These entries are all totally sweet. BTW, "semi-crazed sock" is a nice phrase. --Stubborn Pen (talk) 23:09, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Sod knows, I think Dan Polansky's right that these are names of specific entities hence CFI says there's no real rule on these, so it literally is just voting. Also, I'm not convinced any of these are words, so "all words in all languages" may not apply. Renard Migrant (talk) 11:44, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * If the only relevant language is that supporting discretion, why are there three bullet items that limit such discretion? I'd have thought that the principal need for discretion was for the names of specific entities other than those for which specific language exists. Please note the wording in the NSE section that precedes the three bullet items:
 * "However, policies exist for names of certain kinds of entities. In particular:"
 * Isn't that wording clear enough? This whole discussion seems to me to be an effort to nullify a policy vote because the application to certain entries doesn't suit elitist taste. DCDuring TALK 12:50, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Those policies are all exclusionary, e.g.:
 * No individual person should be listed as a sense in any entry whose page title includes both a given name or diminutive and a family name or patronymic. For instance, Walter Elias Disney, the film producer and voice of Mickey Mouse, is not allowed a definition line at Walt Disney.
 * However right above the clause you mention it states:
 * Among those that do meet that requirement, many should be excluded while some should be included, but there is no agreement on precise, all-encompassing rules for deciding which are which.
 * I might be elitist for feeling that these terms are not worthy of inclusion, but the vagueness of this language does seem to leave a ton of discretion. The spirit of the entire rest of the naming section seems to lean towards genericism, no personal names unless they are generic names, no companies or brands unless they have been genericized.  The NSE section is the only one which we might interpret to allow specific, non-generic names.  I do agree with you that changing the language of the CFI is not within the scope of this discussion, but I don't think the language is clear on this topic. - TheDaveRoss 13:56, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * A "spiritual" reading should also acknowledge our "All words in all languages" slogan, the inclusionist definition-in-practice of "term" in CFI that permits idioms, symbols, letters, variant typography, and abbreviations of many kinds, and "A term should be included if it's likely that someone would run across it and want to know what it means."
 * BTW, the arguments given would not seem to apply to an abbreviation like WaPo (one which I have used), at least as deserving as Grey Lady. DCDuring TALK 14:13, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I am happy to concede WaPo, I was unfamiliar with it but it does seem to have a fair amount of currency, especially on Twitter. The "All Words in All Languages" should probably be restated to "All* Words* in All* Languages*", since four of the five words* used in phrase become very subjective very quickly.  In this particular case, I might run across Jennifer Lopez: and wish to know what that means, however we have decided that names of specific people are outside of the scope of the work we are trying to do here.  I am not sure why J-Lo: is excepted from that, since it is a name which refers to a specific person.  The morphology is common enough, as you can see by the number of entries at the top of the page.  J: and Lo: are probably even attestable as given names at this point...  I am not being obtuse, I understand that there is some difference between Jennifer Lopez: and J-Lo:, I am merely suggesting that the difference is not sufficient that the second merits inclusion. - TheDaveRoss 14:43, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I think that in our slogan even in is not used entirely intuitively.
 * Virtually all abbreviations of proper names have relatively brief definitions: the proper names themselves. This is true whether the named entity is a person, a political party, an airport, a stock ticker symbol, or the name of an organization. We can choose and have chosen to exclude some of these proper names for whatever reason, But, generally, I think the reason is that any material about the referent of the proper name is inherently encyclopedic and unlikely to be satisfactory unless much longer than a dictionary definition. I think the service we perform for users with respect to abbreviations of proper names is to speed them to the relevant encyclopedic material by giving them a canonical name for the referent, possibly even with disambiguation (eg, JFK: president, airport, bridge(s), high schools etc). Here at enwikt we can even provide a hyperlink to the encyclopedic material.
 * The hyphenated abbreviated-names morphology is by no means universal. Even within the discourse realm in which it is current, it seems only to apply to names of sufficient popularity and suitability. The morphology argument applies just about as well to abbreviations like op. cit., ibid, et al, et al.. DCDuring TALK 19:24, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * BD has created a BP discussion about this topic, so we can dig into whether the current wording and interpretation is really what we want it to be. I can't disagree with you about the morphology, this is very grey-area stuff.  Concerning listing things with the intention of providing easy access to Wikipedia... that feels like another can of worms entirely.  That same justification should apply to all names of famous people in general, etc. - TheDaveRoss 19:33, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * We have handled links to WP selectively with and its accompaniments. DCDuring TALK  21:28, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep all and restore, 's Chinese nickname. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 12:48, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * (relevant: 鳥叔 and 梅姐) —suzukaze (t・c) 12:58, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

 * Fairly meh about most of these, but Delete Posh and Becks since Victoria is called "Posh" and David is called "Becks" outside this compound. (The Cockney rhyming slang looks a bit dodgy too, although admittedly rhyming slang doesn't always delete the rhyming element when it's a proper name) Smurrayinchester (talk) 10:49, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Looks like 5 in clear favour of keeping and 2 in clear favour of deleting, with no comments in months, so I'm calling this RFD passed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 03:22, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:J-Lo


text:
Talk:K-Stew

RFD
Kept. See the discussion at Talk:J-Lo. --Dan Polansky (talk) 14:08, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:K-Stew


text:
Talk:Scar-Jo

RFD
Kept. See the discussion at Talk:J-Lo. --Dan Polansky (talk) 14:08, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:Scar-Jo


text:
Talk:Sam-Cam

RFD
Kept. See the discussion at Talk:J-Lo. --Dan Polansky (talk) 14:08, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:Sam-Cam


text:
Talk:Li-Lo

RFD
Kept. See the discussion at Talk:J-Lo. --Dan Polansky (talk) 14:08, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:Li-Lo


text:
Talk:Posh and Becks

RFD
Kept. See the discussion at Talk:J-Lo. --Dan Polansky (talk) 14:09, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
 * That's the general RFD; this was also RFDed separately. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 03:43, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

RFV discussion: January–May 2016
Rfv-sense "sex". I can easily find references for it, but cites are a different story. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 16:04, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

 * RFV failed. —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 18:44, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Posh and Becks
Per a previous comment at RFD, this may be SOP in its literal meaning (Posh + Becks, who are each known by those nicknames outside of this collocation). By the way, there's also a Cockney rhyming slang meaning that's currently at RFV and needs to be cited. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 03:24, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. - TheDaveRoss 12:59, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

 * Delete, as before. bd2412 T 01:05, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Deleted. The alleged rhyming slang sense failed RFV on 17 May 2016: see "Talk:Posh and Becks". — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:16, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:Posh and Becks


text:
Talk:Le-Le

RFD
Kept. See the discussion at Talk:J-Lo. --Dan Polansky (talk) 14:09, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:Le-Le


text:
Talk:Ri-Ri

RFD
Kept. See the discussion at Talk:J-Lo. --Dan Polansky (talk) 14:09, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:Ri-Ri


text:
Talk:Su-Bo

RFD
Kept. See the discussion at Talk:J-Lo. --Dan Polansky (talk) 14:09, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:Su-Bo


text:
Talk:A-Rod

RFD
Kept. See the discussion at Talk:J-Lo. --Dan Polansky (talk) 14:09, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:A-Rod


text:
Talk:K-Rod

RFD
Kept. See the discussion at Talk:J-Lo. --Dan Polansky (talk) 14:09, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:K-Rod


text:
Talk:R-Pattz

RFD
Kept. See the discussion at Talk:J-Lo. --Dan Polansky (talk) 14:10, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:R-Pattz


text:
Talk:WaPo

RFD
Kept. See the discussion at Talk:J-Lo. --Dan Polansky (talk) 14:10, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:WaPo


text: klesskifta

title: klesskifta


text:
Talk:J-Law

RFD
Kept. See the discussion at Talk:J-Lo. --Dan Polansky (talk) 14:10, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:J-Law


text:
ਅਮਰੀਕਾ

Etymology
.

Proper noun

 * 1) America; the United States

title: ਅਮਰੀਕਾ


text:
ਅੰਗਰੇਜ਼ੀ

Etymology
Possibly from, or simply.

Proper noun

 * 1) English

title: ਅੰਗਰੇਜ਼ੀ


text: keeps off

title: keeps off


text: keeping off

title: keeping off


text: kept off

title: kept off


text:
gedachtemisdaad

Noun

 * 1) thoughtcrime

title: gedachtemisdaad


text:
diffamans

Etymology
Present participle of

title: diffamans


text:
diffamaturus

Etymology
Future active participle of

title: diffamaturus


text:
diffamatus

Etymology
Perfect passive participle of

Participle

 * 1) defamed, maligned

title: diffamatus


text:
diffamandus

Etymology
Future passive participle of

title: diffamandus


text:
相対

Adjective

 * 1) confrontation, head-to-head

Verb

 * 1) to confront, face

Noun

 * 1) relativity

Verb

 * 1) to be relative

title: 相対


text:
Talk:send above

RFD
Doesn't look like a phrasal verb to me. --SimonP45 (talk) 11:10, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Is there even a specifically nautical sense of above worth distinguishing from "to or on a higher level". DCDuring TALK 12:11, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Well, I think that above means in nautical terms (so the definition doesn't even look correct). SemperBlotto (talk) 12:13, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I would think that aloft would mean "in or on the rigging of a sailing ship or up or on a mast of a sailing ship" and above would relate to decks. DCDuring TALK 12:41, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

 * Delete as sum of parts; the current def is "(nautical) To order someone to go up to a higher deck on a ship." Double check: not in . --Dan Polansky (talk) 09:20, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

 * Deleted. - -sche (discuss) 19:55, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:send above


text:
Talk:play the gender card

RFD
These should be redirected to gender card and race card, respectively. There are other verbs that could be used, which is just to say that this is not idiomatic, but merely the most common collocation. That means it deserves redirection, not lemmatisation. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 07:22, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

 * That seems to make sense, but... does anybody do anything with the "race card" (probably the original form) other than "playing" it? P Aculeius (talk) 15:28, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Users trying to determine the meaning of the idiom could probably be served by either redirects to perfected NP entries or by keeping these predicate entries.
 * We have a harder time trying to help users who were trying to decode other uses of the playing-card metaphor: "the China card", "the fear card", "the sympathy card", "the victim card", "the ethnic card", "the racial card", etc. All of these are used near forms of the verbs play, use, and others in COCA. I don't think entries for play the card or play the something card will seem like good entries for anyone looking up the expressions.
 * IMO the most important question is whether the card-game metaphor is usefully presented by any dictionary or encyclopedia entry. I think that in virtually all cases the meaning in contextn of the metaphor is fairly obvious to any likely reader of a text in which the expression metaphor is deployed. DCDuring TALK 16:49, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Ah, I see you are playing the likely reader card here. In the case of other snowclones we have entries for the most common versions, is there a reason why that shouldn't be the case here?  In my experience the idiom is play the X card where X card is non-idiomatic outside of the phrase. - TheDaveRoss 17:54, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I wish I/we had "likely reader" facts instead of a mere "card". Snowclones are fun for us, but we have never figured out how to make most of them plausibly usable for normal users. Metaphors have a structure that in general is different from that of snowclones or idiomatic expressions. Typical examples are "life is a card game", "life is a game", "life is a game of chance", "love is a battlefield". "the world is a stage". Our entries barely begin to capture the variety of expression that such metaphors allow. DCDuring TALK 19:30, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * IMO, any argument that hinges on the claim that something is "fairly obvious to any likely reader", particularly one without any stats to back it up, is inherently a weak one. I'm inclined to agree with Dave and Aculeius that playing the race card is far-and-away the most common usage and therefore should be kept.  BTW, shortly after weighing in, I intend to create gender card. Pur ple back pack 89   20:13, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Even on the most obvious things relating to the desired characteristics of landing pages, we fail to use standard practices. We don't use best practices for lexicography other than copying what can be legally copied. I sincerely doubt that the availability of statistics on user behavior would make the slightest difference: we would continue to run the show for our own amusement. DCDuring TALK 21:58, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

 * Keep. I entered "play the * card" into Google, and it gave me a dictionary entry for "play the —— card"; interesting. dictionary.cambridge.org has "play the race card". . I think we should better give the reader a couple of most common instantiations of a snowclone rather than a sort of a formula for the snowclone. I expect that the readers are better at extrapolating from examples than using formulas. And the examples are the thing attested. As for lemmings, "play the race card" is in Collins and dictionary.cambridge.org. --Dan Polansky (talk) 22:29, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

 * I am not bothered if these are deleted, but we should at least have a usage note at race card etc. stating that the usual verb is "play" (because of the card-game metaphor). It's not the only verb. Equinox ◑ 00:05, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
 * So what are the other verbs? I'd like to check Google Ngram Viewer for frequency. --Dan Polansky (talk) 00:09, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

 * Just a quick skim on Google Books: "the perpetrator is accused of using the race card"; "a liberal throws down the race card"; and (doing things other than playing it) "growing pressures to put down [i.e. cease playing] the race card"; "she dismissed the gender card". Equinox ◑ 00:14, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Based on this, I looked at . Seeing that "play" is very predominant, I would be unhappy to see the combinations with "play" deleted from the dictionary. Hard redirects would be the very minimum, but my preferred option is to keep the nominated entries full blown. --Dan Polansky (talk) 00:22, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't mind keeping when one collocation is by far the most common, which seems to be the case here. A couple of attestations for 'use the race card' don't make 'play the race card' unidiomatic. Renard Migrant (talk) 00:01, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

 * The problem I see is not with the word play, but with the fact that any "card" can be used in this phrase: "the race card", "the gender card", "that card", "the sympathy card", "the black card", "the kid card", "the Nazi card", "the victim card", "the veteran card", and the newly re-defined "the Trump card". An interesting thing to note is that Google's automatic dictionary (I'm not sure what source dictionary it uses) shows the entry for "play the —— card" when you search for "play the race card" and calls it a "phrase of card". --WikiTiki89 00:30, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

 * I had thought of that, too. But I see no way round that. Even if we added a sense to that's 'only used in combination with another noun' I can't see race card, gender card (and so on) being deleted by majority consensus. Renard Migrant (talk) 00:33, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I would like to play the mental health card. But I can't. Obviously. We need to play with a full deck, to be one card shy of a full deck, let alone two, smacks of full-deckism. If we try to delete every harmless snowperson clone another fool card will be along shortly; probably at the same time every year, to keep building them up again. --Riverstogo (talk) 21:37, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, but nothing you say makes any sense to me. --WikiTiki89 22:28, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I get the feeling that sentence is either a) intentionally nonsensical, or b) Wonderfool complaining that people don't like him. Pur ple back pack 89  16:55, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * , race card is a figure of speech and therefore would pass CFI. Also, the "price" of getting play the race card deleted is keeping race card. Pur ple back pack 89   16:55, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

 * RFD kept as no consensus for deletion, after more than 2 months have elapsed; no boldface delete posted other than the implied one in the nomination. --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:24, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:play the gender card


text: diffamanda

title: diffamanda


text: diffamandae

title: diffamandae


text: diffamandorum

title: diffamandorum


text: diffamandarum

title: diffamandarum


text: diffamandis

title: diffamandis


text: diffamandam

title: diffamandam


text: diffamandos

title: diffamandos


text:
Talk:play the race card

RFD
Kept. See Talk:play the gender card. --Dan Polansky (talk) 14:19, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:play the race card


text: diffamandas

title: diffamandas


text: diffamande

title: diffamande


text: diffamantes

title: diffamantes


text: diffamantia

title: diffamantia


text: diffamantis

title: diffamantis


text: diffamantium

title: diffamantium


text: diffamantibus

title: diffamantibus


text: diffamantem

title: diffamantem


text: diffamatura

title: diffamatura


text: diffamaturum

title: diffamaturum


text: diffamaturi

title: diffamaturi


text: diffamaturae

title: diffamaturae


text: diffamaturorum

title: diffamaturorum


text: diffamaturarum

title: diffamaturarum


text: diffamaturo

title: diffamaturo


text: diffamaturis

title: diffamaturis


text: diffamaturam

title: diffamaturam


text: diffamaturos

title: diffamaturos


text: diffamaturas

title: diffamaturas


text: diffamature

title: diffamature


text: diffamatae

title: diffamatae


text:
Talk:raisin sec

RFD
Indeed, a raisin is just a "dried grape". But that doesn't make it deserving of an entry meaning just "dried grape", does it? We can keep the translation and just link each word separately, and get rid of this SOP entry. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 18:13, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep, strictly speaking this means "dry grape", not "dried grape" (which would be raisin séché). If you wash a grape and dry it off with a paper towel, it's a [[raisin]] [[sec]] but not a [[raisin sec]]. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 07:10, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. French uses for other dried fruits as well, nothing special about grapes. --WikiTiki89 18:01, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Indeed, fr:sec does have this meaning. Renard Migrant (talk) 19:02, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * And yet fr:raisin sec is considered entryworthy and is glossed "Grain de raisin séché." And a raisin sec doesn't stop being a raisin sec just because it gets wet. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 19:19, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Your second point is irrelevant now that we've established that sec is being used with a different meaning (i.e. the meaning of "having had its moisture evaporated"). --WikiTiki89 19:34, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * But we don't have that sense of sec. I also note that http://www.cnrtl.fr/definition/raisin considers a separate sense for raisin sec desirable; it even distinguishes between "Raisin(s) séché(s) au soleil ou à l'aide d'une source de chaleur artificielle" and, by metonymy, "grains de raisin ainsi séchés". I admit I'm not sure what the distinction between raisin(s) and grains de raisin is, though. (By contrast, http://www.cnrtl.fr/definition/banane, http://www.cnrtl.fr/definition/pomme, and http://www.cnrtl.fr/definition/abricot do not have separate lines for "banane sèche", "pomme sèche", and "abricot sec", suggesting that their lexicographers feel that there is something more lexical about raisin sec than about other dried fruits. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 19:55, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * We do now. As to other dictionaries, I've never been a fan of WT:LEMMING. --WikiTiki89 20:10, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm a fan. If we don't have LEMMING (which, btw, needs a name change to something more positive), there will be dictionaries that have entries that we don't, and therefore people will use those dictionaries and not ours. Pur ple back pack 89   01:08, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep: We need ways to explain that raisin in English and raisin in French aren't exactly the same thing. Keeping this entry is one of those things. Pur ple back pack 89   17:58, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * That's why we have separate English and French sections for raisin. If we can't explain the difference adequately there, having an entry for raisin sec won't help. Chuck Entz (talk) 04:02, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Isn’t this a special sense of that can be used with any fruit? — Ungoliant (falai) 19:22, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, and seemingly other foods, such as fish, as well. --WikiTiki89 19:37, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

 * Keep since this seems to be the main or only way to say "raisin" in French, and "raisin" is a single word with many single-word translations. --Dan Polansky (talk) 11:18, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Since when was that a criterion? --WikiTiki89 16:58, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
 * It's not in CFI. It's one of those ad-hoc criteria that some people use to salvage some sum of part entries, based on the widespread notion that the principle that "each and every sum of parts entry shall be excluded " is to be rejected. --Dan Polansky (talk) 17:02, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete, having a SOP entry in a foreign language is confusing, leading people like me to scratch their heads as to why it exists. Siuenti (talk) 15:52, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per my previous comment, which seems to have been accidentally deleted. Renard Migrant (talk) 21:59, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
 * What was you previous comment? --WikiTiki89 18:18, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Keep. There's a difference between raisin sec and raisin séché. --Hekaheka (talk) 18:13, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Delete. It's a common collocation, but that doesn't make it non-SOP. Andrew Sheedy (talk) 01:34, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

 * RFD kept as no consensus for deletion, after more than 2 months have elapsed. --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:26, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:raisin sec


text: diffamatorum

title: diffamatorum


text: diffamatarum

title: diffamatarum


text: diffamatam

title: diffamatam


text: diffamatos

title: diffamatos


text: diffamatas

title: diffamatas


text: divaganda

title: divaganda


text: divagandae

title: divagandae


text: divagandorum

title: divagandorum


text: divagandarum

title: divagandarum


text: divagandis

title: divagandis


text: divagandam

title: divagandam


text: divagandos

title: divagandos


text: divagandas

title: divagandas


text: divagande

title: divagande


text: divagantes

title: divagantes


text: divagantia

title: divagantia


text: divagantis

title: divagantis


text: divagantium

title: divagantium


text: divaganti

title: divaganti


text: divagantibus

title: divagantibus


text: divagantem

title: divagantem


text: divagatura

title: divagatura


text: divagaturum

title: divagaturum


text:
Talk:PETボトル

RFD
SoP. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 11:13, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Is ペットボトル SoP too? --Daniel Carrero (talk) 11:22, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

 * Yes. Do we have an entry [[PET bottle]], which has passed RFD? --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 11:40, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

 * I would also check a bunch of requested Japanese entries by Daniel Carrero at WT:WE, some look like SoP or borderline. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 11:51, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

 * IMO "PET bottle" is a strange construction that should be kept. (I'd give better reasoning for keeping but I suck at explaining my thoughts...) —suzukaze (t・c) 13:14, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
 * PET doesn't have a Japanese section. Renard Migrant (talk) 16:19, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Hmmm, this is the answer to the question "how do you say 'plastic bottle' in Japanese"... seems like Wiktionary should have that information somewhere. Siuenti (talk) 23:03, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
 * PET comes from polyethylene terephthalate, but everyone read it as 'pet', including my country. (ขวด PET, ขวดเพ็ท or something) About mixed-script words, many entries in Wiktionary can have them, for example in top list of Category:Chinese simplified forms. So PET doesn't need to have a Japanese section. --Octahedron80 (talk) 13:37, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Presumably it needs a translingual section, then. Per your own comment. Renard Migrant (talk) 17:11, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
 * PET is a loadword from English both in Japanese and in Thai. There is no need to create a translingual section. — T AKASUGI Shinji (talk) 05:34, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. PETボトル is common while PET is not, and a Japanese chemist would pronounce the latter as pī ī tī to avoid a possible confusion with ペット. — T AKASUGI Shinji (talk) 05:34, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

 * As ancillary evidence suggesting SOP-ness, there are also the collocations (petto-bukuro, “PET bag”) and  (petto-bako, “PET box”).  I would hazard that PET has become something of a synonym in Japanese for “ (especially of a particular thickness and/or strength)”.   is certainly easier to pronounce than .  ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 17:28, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep besides the reasons mentioned above, mainstream dictionaries, which have generally the same approaches to inclusion, all have it--at least Kōjien, Meikyo, and Progressive do. Honestly I can't think of any other way to say "plastic bottle" (simply botoru refers to glass bottles) n or can have I heard another use of "PET" in the sense of plastic.  PET箱 and PET袋 get few results and they tend to be web pages of manufacturers. --Haplogy (話) 05:36, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * (made of / from PET) finds a number of relevant hits. ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 01:49, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

 * Keep I live in Japan and I've confirmed two PET bottles in my kitchen right now.Both of them has a notice written as PETボトル and I've found the word at this link. Even if you don't have Japanese font, you can confirm it. "ペットボトル" and "PETボトル", they should be considered as a synonym--Carl Daniels (talk) 12:04, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you for confirming the existence of this phrase. However, the question is not whether the phrase exists, but whether it is idiomatic.  ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 18:59, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

 * RFD kept per consensus. --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:29, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:PETボトル


text: divagaturi

title: divagaturi


text: divagaturae

title: divagaturae


text: divagaturorum

title: divagaturorum


text: divagaturarum

title: divagaturarum


text: divagaturo

title: divagaturo


text: divagaturis

title: divagaturis


text: divagaturam

title: divagaturam


text: divagaturos

title: divagaturos


text: divagaturas

title: divagaturas


text: divagature

title: divagature


text: divagatae

title: divagatae


text: divagatorum

title: divagatorum


text: divagatarum

title: divagatarum


text: divagatis

title: divagatis


text: divagatam

title: divagatam


text: divagatos

title: divagatos


text: divagatas

title: divagatas


text:
Talk:Gunther

RFD
This name, a member of the bijou category Translingual misspellings, is listed under English (as derived from the German Günther) and German (as a variant of Günther). We don't normally have Translingual entries for names as well, do we? Keith the Koala (talk) 13:29, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I suppose names are generally translingual as your name stays in the same in all languages, generally unless there's a change of script involved. But this isn't the page to propose policy changes. Anyway this isn't even a misspelling as it exists in languages such as English and even in German as a non-misspelling. So delete, it's frankly a very easy case. Renard Migrant (talk) 18:09, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

 * Delete per Renard: in German, this may be a misspelling or a simplified spelling, but translingually speaking--and the translingual sense is nominated here--this is not a misspelling. --Dan Polansky (talk) 12:57, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. Do not delete. "Gunther" is just as well an English transliteration of "Günther" as "Nakayama" is of "中山". "Guenther" is the gramatically accurate English rendition, but aesthetically unpleasing. Both, however, are completely accepted in English and are English names of German origin. In fact, in some cases, "Günther" is an acceptable English name. Permitted as a name in the State of Oregon. Also acceptable as an English article title on wiki. Similar to how "José" has become the number one baby name in America, even though it contains non-English letters.12.22.31.66 06:30, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
 * The Translingual entry is being nominated, not English. --Dan Polansky (talk) 10:03, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
 * The IP is arguing to keep an entry which is not nominated for deletion. Renard Migrant (talk) 13:47, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I've struck the comment accordingly. - -sche (discuss) 20:11, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

 * Delete per nom and per Dan. - -sche (discuss) 20:11, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

 * RFD failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 20:55, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:Gunther


text: divellenda

title: divellenda


text: divellendae

title: divellendae


text: divellendorum

title: divellendorum


text: divellendarum

title: divellendarum


text: divellendis

title: divellendis


text: divellendam

title: divellendam


text: divellendos

title: divellendos


text: divellendas

title: divellendas


text: divellende

title: divellende


text: divellentes

title: divellentes


text: divellentia

title: divellentia


text: divellentis

title: divellentis


text: divellentium

title: divellentium


text: divellenti

title: divellenti


text:
ebibens

Etymology
Present participle of

Participle

 * 1) absorbing

title: ebibens


text:
ebibiturus

Etymology
Future active participle of

Participle

 * 1) about to absorb

title: ebibiturus


text: divellentibus

title: divellentibus


text: divellentem

title: divellentem


text:
ebibitus

Etymology
Perfect passive participle of

Participle

 * 1) absorbed

title: ebibitus


text:
ebibendus

Etymology
Future passive participle of

Participle

 * 1) which is to be absorbed

title: ebibendus


text: divendenda

title: divendenda


text: divendendae

title: divendendae


text: divendendorum

title: divendendorum


text: divendendarum

title: divendendarum


text: divendendis

title: divendendis


text:
Talk:Wimbledon

Wimbledon
Delete the two "sports club" senses per Talk:São Paulo and Talk:UCLA. - -sche (discuss) 22:41, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: per nom Pur ple back pack 89  22:43, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure that we should, the interesting links to Wikipedia would be lost. It's not all that far (10 miles or so) from where I live. Donnanz (talk) 22:59, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

 * We could have them as links under "See also". They don't have to be separate sense lines. Equinox ◑ 23:52, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Deleting the definition doesn't necessarily mean deleting the links to Wikipedia. Renard Migrant (talk) 00:11, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

 * Keep both - the definitions are accurate. SemperBlotto (talk) 06:33, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Accuracy aside, are they different to the definition of the place in London? The Wimbledon in 'Wimbledon F.C.' and 'AFC Wimbledon' refers to the actual place called 'Wimbledon'. Renard Migrant (talk) 18:46, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per previous discussion cited above, any sporting club named after a city could then become a definition of that city's name.  Do we really want to add separate senses for every sports franchise under its current or former host city's name?  For New York, that would mean as many as forty-two different senses (assuming I haven't left any out, which I probably have).  What would we find for Philadelphia, Boston, Chicago, or Los Angeles?  Even small-town America has lots of these.  The names of every notable city and town in the world would be engulfed by a parade of sports teams.  Even if you argue for restraint, should every city or town also have a sense, "any of various sports teams located in and named after ~"?  I think it would be a good idea to make not having such senses an official policy.
 * 1. The New York Giants baseball team (until 1957). 2. The New York Yankees baseball team (Highlanders until circa 1914). 3. The New York Mets baseball team.  4. The New York Knickerbockers baseball team (1840s–1860s).  5. The New York Mutuals baseball team (1857-1876).  6. The New York Metropolitans baseball team (1880–1887).  7. The New York Giants baseball team (Players' League, 1890).  8. The New York Black Yankees baseball team (1931–1948).  9. The New York Cubans baseball team (1935–1950).  10. The New York Giants football team.  11. The New York Jets football team (Titans until 1963).  12. The New York Giants football team (1919–1922).  13. The New York Yankees football team (1926–1929).  14. The New York Yankees football team (1936–1937).  15. The New York Tigers football team (1937).  16. The New York Yankees football team (1940–1941; Americans in 1941).  17. The New York Yankees football team (American Association, 1941).  18. The New York Yankees football team (1946–1949).  19. The New York Yanks football team (1949–1951; Bulldogs in 1949).  20. The New York Stars football team (1974).  21. The New York Knights arena football team (1988).  22. The New York CityHawks arena football team (1997–1998).  23. The New York Dragons arena football team (2001–2008).  24. The New York Sharks football team.  25. The New York Knights rugby football league team.  26. The New York Raiders rugby league football team (2003–2013).  27. The New York Athletic Club rugby union team.  28. The New York Knickerbockers basketball team.  29. The New York Liberty basketball team.  30. The New York Nets basketball team (1968–1977).  31. The New York Rangers hockey team.  32. The New York Islanders hockey team.  33. The New York Americans hockey team (1925–1941).  34. The New York Raiders hockey team (1972–1974, Golden Blades 1973–1974).  35. The New York Rovers hockey team (1935–1952, 1959–1961, 1964–1965).  36. The New York Red Bulls soccer team.  37. The New York City Football Club soccer team.  38. The New York Cosmos soccer team.  39. The New York Cosmos soccer team (1970–1985).  40. The New York Rumble ultimate frisbee team.  41. The New York Arrows indoor soccer team (1978–1984).  42. The New York Magpies Australian rules football team. P Aculeius (talk) 13:36, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I don't believe that any of those teams are just called "New York" are they? SemperBlotto (talk) 13:40, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Sure they are. " took three of four from  during their last series." - TheDaveRoss 13:47, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. You can add then if you have nothing better to do. SemperBlotto (talk) 13:50, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I don't think we should probably include them as it is a standard construction. The same thing applies to virtually every town, at least in the US.  We would refer to opposing teams by the names of the towns from which they came, but I don't think "A high school football team from Hanover, NH" is really a definition of "Hanover" etc.  They would certainly be citable, though, since the local papers also use the same construction. - TheDaveRoss 13:58, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Right. The list above is just the tip of the metonymy iceberg. can be used to cite several sense-lines denoting different small university cricket teams, and  shows that even small places will grow by a large number of sense-lines., how about phrases like "[the] Americans won the [World] Cup"; do you think "American" or "Americans" should have a separate sense-line "# The US national soccer (football) team." ? - -sche (discuss) 20:03, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

 * Keep This is an unusual case, since the more easily citable team is the one that no longer exists.— Pingkudimmi 14:53, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Well, it does still exist, but under a new name in a different town. They are known as the Dons (both teams I suppose, it's short for Wimbledon), a name I can relate to. Donnanz (talk) 15:01, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Milton Keynes Dons F.C., with a nod to its origins. An interesting philosophical point: is it still the same team if all the members, the management, the location, most of the fans and the name have all changed? Apparently yes, and doubtless there are people who still call it "Wimbledon". And yes, it seems they were called the Dons, as well as the Wombles.— Pingkudimmi 05:24, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

 * Delete per TDR and Aculeius. This is a particularly generic sort of metonymy. It contrasts with superficially similar metonymy, like White House, Pentagon, Number 10, Whitehall, for which the selection of the building does not follow a standard pattern. It is more like using Albany to refer to NY state government. DCDuring TALK 15:10, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Indeed. As I commented on Talk:UCLA, this is just the routine phenomenon that a representative part of a group can be referred to as the group. "[The] Americans won the Fina Cup in Barcelona, Spain." (Not every American; many Americans didn't even compete.) "Wikipedia deleted [[w:Aqua-hoochie]] in 2006." (Actually, it was only deleted by one admin, not by the site itself or by every user working in unison or in sequence.) - -sche (discuss) 18:18, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

 * To hell with it, I'm voting keep. An entry for Wimbledon is needed anyway, so the football clubs may as well be included in it for completeness. There seems to be a certain amount of polarisation in the voting so far. Donnanz (talk) 15:38, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I can only imagine how many definitions United, City and Town will end up with. United will be over 100 for sure. Good luck trying to agree on an order for them! Renard Migrant (talk) 15:40, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

 * Delete per nom; if kept, do not apply this as a rule. If we are to have anything separate from the main definition for any of these, it should be a single line with a second level of indentation saying, "by extension, athletic, competitive, or demonstrative teams from that location". Outside of athletics, New York could just as easily beat Boston in a chess tournament, a team trivia contest, or a team pie-eating contest. I will concede that Boston would almost certainly win the pie-eating contest. bd2412 T 16:38, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

 * Agreed: I was thinking of Scrabble, or pub darts. Delete. Equinox ◑ 17:06, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete, as the 'Wimbledon' in the title of the two football clubs refers to Wimbledon, the place in London. Similarly the Leeds in 'Leeds United' refers to the actual city of Leeds. It's not some sort of crazy coincidence that Leeds United is in Leeds. Renard Migrant (talk) 18:45, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Funny that, what about at Leeds Castle in Kent? Donnanz (talk) 00:10, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
 * is also in . Keith the Koala (talk) 12:16, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
 * No mention of a castle in the article on Leeds, Yorkshire. Donnanz (talk) 20:00, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
 * And? Renard Migrant (talk) 13:48, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

 * Delete senses for sports clubs that are in entries for place names. Governed by WT:NSE, and therefore, CFI gives editors discretion on how to handle them. bd2412 above shows how varied and generic this type of metonymy is. As an auxiliary guide, I checked and found no dictionary including sport teams. --Dan Polansky (talk) 13:35, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is quite transparent: if we imagine Scrilp and Glarg as two cities, then "Scrilp beat Glarg 14-13 in overtime" makes perfect sense. There are all kinds of interesting details about Wimbledon's sports teams, but they're not lexicographically significant. The fact that someone lives near there is irrelevant. I live in Los Angeles, which also has plenty of weirdness regarding sports teams, but I wouldn't want to clutter the Los Angeles entry with the Rams, Raiders, Dons, Lakers, Clippers, Sparks, Dodgers, Angels, Kings, Sharks, Galaxy, Aztecs, Lazers, Wolves, etc. (see w:Category:Sports teams in Los Angeles, California for dozens more). Chuck Entz (talk) 21:01, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. However, we have plenty of abbreviations of sports team - Man U, LUFC, Atleti etc. Also, we have Arsenal (should probably be deleted), but not Chelsea. --Ce mot-ci (talk) 15:44, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Not really germane, since this discussion is about Wimbledon, not Arsenal, but: if Arsenal were well known as the name of a city or town, then it would make sense to delete it as a definition. But in fact, it's named after the w|Royal Arsenal at Woolwich, where the founding members of the football club worked.  It's not a city or town, and in fact no longer an active facility, having ceased production nearly fifty years ago.  Most people searching for the word will either want the common noun or the football club; curiosity about the original Woolwich Arsenal is likely to be derived from the football club's popularity (though certainly not in every case).  So it wouldn't really make sense to delete Arsenal, as it's not merely one of many likely uses of the name of a town or village, as are "London" or "Birmingham" or "Los Angeles".  P Aculeius (talk) 15:48, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

 * RFD deleted per consensus. --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:32, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:Wimbledon


text: divendendam

title: divendendam


text: divendendos

title: divendendos


text: divendendas

title: divendendas


text: divendende

title: divendende


text: divendentes

title: divendentes


text: divendentia

title: divendentia


text: divendentis

title: divendentis


text: divendentium

title: divendentium


text: divendenti

title: divendenti


text: divendente

title: divendente


text: divendentibus

title: divendentibus


text: divendentem

title: divendentem


text: ebibendi

title: ebibendi


text: divenditura

title: divenditura


text: ebibendo

title: ebibendo


text: divenditurum

title: divenditurum


text: ebibendum

title: ebibendum


text: divendituri

title: divendituri


text: divenditurae

title: divenditurae


text: ebibitum

title: ebibitum


text: divenditurorum

title: divenditurorum


text: ebibitu

title: ebibitu


text: divenditurarum

title: divenditurarum


text: divendituro

title: divendituro


text: divendituris

title: divendituris


text: divendituram

title: divendituram


text: divendituros

title: divendituros


text: divendituras

title: divendituras


text: divenditure

title: divenditure


text: divendita

title: divendita


text: divenditi

title: divenditi


text: divenditae

title: divenditae


text: divenditorum

title: divenditorum


text: divenditarum

title: divenditarum


text: divenditam

title: divenditam


text: divenditos

title: divenditos


text: divenditas

title: divenditas


text: diversura

title: diversura


text: diversurum

title: diversurum


text: diversuri

title: diversuri


text: diversurae

title: diversurae


text: diversurorum

title: diversurorum


text: diversurarum

title: diversurarum


text: diversuro

title: diversuro


text: diversuris

title: diversuris


text: diversuram

title: diversuram


text: diversuros

title: diversuros


text: diversuras

title: diversuras


text: diversure

title: diversure


text: eblandiendi

title: eblandiendi


text: eblandiendo

title: eblandiendo


text: divertenda

title: divertenda


text: eblandiendum

title: eblandiendum


text: eblanditu

title: eblanditu


text: divertendae

title: divertendae


text: divertendorum

title: divertendorum


text: divertendarum

title: divertendarum


text: divertendis

title: divertendis


text: divertendam

title: divertendam


text: divertendos

title: divertendos


text: divertendas

title: divertendas


text: divertende

title: divertende


text: divexanda

title: divexanda


text: divexandae

title: divexandae


text: divexandorum

title: divexandorum


text: divexandarum

title: divexandarum


text: divexandis

title: divexandis


text: divexandam

title: divexandam


text: divexandos

title: divexandos


text: divexandas

title: divexandas


text: divexande

title: divexande


text: divexantes

title: divexantes


text: divexantia

title: divexantia


text: divexantis

title: divexantis


text: divexantium

title: divexantium


text: divexanti

title: divexanti


text: divexante

title: divexante


text: divexantibus

title: divexantibus


text: divexantem

title: divexantem


text: divexatura

title: divexatura


text: divexaturum

title: divexaturum


text: divexaturi

title: divexaturi


text: divexaturae

title: divexaturae


text: divexaturorum

title: divexaturorum


text: divexaturarum

title: divexaturarum


text: divexaturo

title: divexaturo


text: divexaturis

title: divexaturis


text: divexaturam

title: divexaturam


text: divexaturos

title: divexaturos


text: divexaturas

title: divexaturas


text: divexature

title: divexature


text: divexata

title: divexata


text: divexati

title: divexati


text: divexatae

title: divexatae


text: divexatorum

title: divexatorum


text: divexatarum

title: divexatarum


text: divexatam

title: divexatam


text: divexatos

title: divexatos


text: divexatas

title: divexatas


text: divinanda

title: divinanda


text: divinandae

title: divinandae


text: divinandorum

title: divinandorum


text: divinandarum

title: divinandarum


text: divinandis

title: divinandis


text: divinandam

title: divinandam


text: divinandos

title: divinandos


text: divinandas

title: divinandas


text: divinande

title: divinande


text: divinatura

title: divinatura


text: divinaturum

title: divinaturum


text: divinaturi

title: divinaturi


text: divinaturae

title: divinaturae


text: divinaturorum

title: divinaturorum


text: divinaturarum

title: divinaturarum


text:
eblandiendus

Etymology
Future passive participle of

title: eblandiendus


text: divinaturo

title: divinaturo


text: divinaturis

title: divinaturis


text: divinaturam

title: divinaturam


text:
ecferans

Etymology
Present participle of

title: ecferans


text: divinaturos

title: divinaturos


text:
ecferaturus

Etymology
Future active participle of

title: ecferaturus


text: divinaturas

title: divinaturas


text:
ecferatus

Etymology
Perfect passive participle of

title: ecferatus


text: divinature

title: divinature


text:
ecferandus

Etymology
Future passive participle of

title: ecferandus


text: divinatae

title: divinatae


text: divinatorum

title: divinatorum


text: divinatarum

title: divinatarum


text:
ecfringens

Etymology
Present participle of

title: ecfringens


text:
ecfracturus

Etymology
Future active participle of

title: ecfracturus


text: divinatam

title: divinatam


text:
ecfractus

Etymology
Perfect passive participle of

title: ecfractus


text: divinatos

title: divinatos


text:
ecfringendus

Etymology
Future passive participle of

title: ecfringendus


text: ebullitu

title: ebullitu


text: divinatas

title: divinatas


text:
edictans

Etymology
Present participle of

Participle

 * 1) proclaiming

title: edictans


text:
edictaturus

Etymology
Future active participle of

Participle

 * 1) about to proclaim

title: edictaturus


text: divolganda

title: divolganda


text:
edictatus

Etymology
Perfect passive participle of

Participle

 * 1) proclaimed

title: edictatus


text:
edictandus

Etymology
Future passive participle of

Participle

 * 1) which is to be proclaimed

title: edictandus


text: divolgandae

title: divolgandae


text: divolgandorum

title: divolgandorum


text:
ediscens

Etymology
Present participle of

Participle

 * 1) studying, learning by heart

title: ediscens


text: divolgandarum

title: divolgandarum


text: divolgandis

title: divolgandis


text:
edisserens

Etymology
Present participle of

title: edisserens


text: divolgandam

title: divolgandam


text:
edisserturus

Etymology
Future active participle of

title: edisserturus


text: divolgandos

title: divolgandos


text:
edissertus

Etymology
Perfect passive participle of

title: edissertus


text: divolgandas

title: divolgandas


text:
edisserendus

Etymology
Future passive participle of

Participle

 * 1) Which is to be explained

title: edisserendus


text: divolgande

title: divolgande


text:
edocens

Etymology
Present participle of

Participle

 * 1) teaching, instructing thoroughly

title: edocens


text: divolgantes

title: divolgantes


text:
edocturus

Etymology
Future active participle of

title: edocturus


text: divolgantia

title: divolgantia


text: divolgantis

title: divolgantis


text: divolgantium

title: divolgantium


text: divolganti

title: divolganti


text: divolgante

title: divolgante


text:
edormiens

Etymology
Present participle of

title: edormiens


text: divolgantibus

title: divolgantibus


text: divolgantem

title: divolgantem


text:
edormiscens

Etymology
Present participle of

title: edormiscens


text: divolgatura

title: divolgatura


text: divolgaturum

title: divolgaturum


text: divolgaturi

title: divolgaturi


text: divolgaturae

title: divolgaturae


text: divolgaturorum

title: divolgaturorum


text: divolgaturarum

title: divolgaturarum


text: divolgaturo

title: divolgaturo


text: divolgaturis

title: divolgaturis


text: divolgaturam

title: divolgaturam


text: divolgaturos

title: divolgaturos


text: divolgaturas

title: divolgaturas


text: divolgature

title: divolgature


text: divolgata

title: divolgata


text: divolgati

title: divolgati


text: divolgatae

title: divolgatae


text: divolgatorum

title: divolgatorum


text: divolgatarum

title: divolgatarum


text: divolgatam

title: divolgatam


text: divolgatos

title: divolgatos


text: divolgatas

title: divolgatas


text: divulsura

title: divulsura


text: Category:French terms borrowed from Latin


text: divulsurum

title: divulsurum


text: Category:Portuguese terms borrowed from French


text: divulsuri

title: divulsuri


text: Category:Gujarati terms borrowed from Sanskrit


text: divulsurae

title: divulsurae


text: divulsurorum

title: divulsurorum


text: Category:Latin terms borrowed from Ancient Greek


text: divulsurarum

title: divulsurarum


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Sanskrit

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Sanskrit


text: divulsuro

title: divulsuro


text: Category:Spanish terms borrowed from Latin


text: divulsuris

title: divulsuris


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Medieval Latin


text: divulsuram

title: divulsuram


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Armenian

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Armenian


text: divulsuros

title: divulsuros


text: divulsuras

title: divulsuras


text: divulsure

title: divulsure


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Late Latin

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Late Latin


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Ottoman Turkish


text: doctorantia

title: doctorantia


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Hungarian

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Hungarian


text: doctorantis

title: doctorantis


text: Category:Portuguese terms borrowed from Ancient Greek


text: doctorantium

title: doctorantium


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Slovak

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Slovak


text: doctoranti

title: doctoranti


text: doctorantibus

title: doctorantibus


text: Category:English terms borrowed from Classical Nahuatl


text: doctorantem

title: doctorantem


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Georgian

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Georgian


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Malay

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Malay


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Old English


text: doctoratura

title: doctoratura


text: doctoraturum

title: doctoraturum


text: doctoraturi

title: doctoraturi


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Middle English


text: doctoraturae

title: doctoraturae


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Danish

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Danish


text: doctoraturorum

title: doctoraturorum


text: doctoraturarum

title: doctoraturarum


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Swedish

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Swedish


text: doctoraturo

title: doctoraturo


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Old Armenian


text: doctoraturis

title: doctoraturis


text: Category:Tzotzil transitive verbs

title: Category:Tzotzil transitive verbs


text: doctoraturam

title: doctoraturam


text: Category:Proto-Loloish language

title: Category:Proto-Loloish language


text: doctoraturos

title: doctoraturos


text: Category:Proto-Kuki-Chin language

title: Category:Proto-Kuki-Chin language


text: doctoraturas

title: doctoraturas


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Catalan

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Catalan


text: doctorature

title: doctorature


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Middle Dutch


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Cantonese

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Cantonese


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Gothic

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Gothic


text: doctorata

title: doctorata


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Proto-Germanic


text:
ਪੱਤਾ

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) leaf
 * 2) playing card
 * 3) trick, trickery, deceit

title: ਪੱਤਾ


text: Category:Dutch terms borrowed from Yiddish


text: doctorati

title: doctorati


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Finnish

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Finnish


text: doctoratae

title: doctoratae


text: ecferandi

title: ecferandi


text: Category:Terms borrowed from New Latin

title: Category:Terms borrowed from New Latin


text: doctoratorum

title: doctoratorum


text: ecferando

title: ecferando


text: doctoratarum

title: doctoratarum


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Venetian

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Venetian


text: ecferandum

title: ecferandum


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Romani

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Romani


text: ecferatum

title: ecferatum


text: ecferatu

title: ecferatu


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Pali

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Pali


text: doctoratam

title: doctoratam


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Latvian

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Latvian


text: doctoratos

title: doctoratos


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Avestan

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Avestan


text: doctoratas

title: doctoratas


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Korean

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Korean


text: Category:Terms borrowed from German Low German


text: dogmatizanda

title: dogmatizanda


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Byzantine Greek


text: Category:English terms borrowed from Old Irish


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Andalusian Arabic


text: dogmatizandae

title: dogmatizandae


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Thai

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Thai


text: dogmatizandorum

title: dogmatizandorum


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Kazakh

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Kazakh


text: dogmatizandarum

title: dogmatizandarum


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Yiddish

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Yiddish


text: dogmatizandis

title: dogmatizandis


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Scots

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Scots


text: dogmatizandam

title: dogmatizandam


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Breton

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Breton


text: dogmatizandos

title: dogmatizandos


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Vulgar Latin


text: dogmatizandas

title: dogmatizandas


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Vietnamese

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Vietnamese


text: dogmatizande

title: dogmatizande


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Mongolian

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Mongolian


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Bengali

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Bengali


text: Category:Aromanian terms inherited from Vulgar Latin


text: dogmatizantes

title: dogmatizantes


text: dogmatizantia

title: dogmatizantia


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Estonian

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Estonian


text: dogmatizantis

title: dogmatizantis


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Belarusian

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Belarusian


text: dogmatizantium

title: dogmatizantium


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Old East Slavic


text: dogmatizanti

title: dogmatizanti


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Urdu

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Urdu


text: dogmatizante

title: dogmatizante


text: Category:Dime nouns

title: Category:Dime nouns


text: dogmatizantibus

title: dogmatizantibus


text: Category:Dime lemmas

title: Category:Dime lemmas


text: dogmatizantem

title: dogmatizantem


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Azerbaijani


text: Category:Hawaiian terms borrowed from Ancient Greek


text:
klessnor

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) a clothes line, or washing line (UK)

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) a clothes line, or washing line (UK)

title: klessnor


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Old Welsh

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Old Welsh


text: dogmatizatura

title: dogmatizatura


text: Category:Gan nouns

title: Category:Gan nouns


text: dogmatizaturum

title: dogmatizaturum


text: Category:Panare nouns

title: Category:Panare nouns


text: dogmatizaturi

title: dogmatizaturi


text:
Category:Gan lemmas

hr:Kategorija:gan (indeks) pt:Categoria:!Entrada (Gan)

title: Category:Gan lemmas


text: dogmatizaturae

title: dogmatizaturae


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Slovene

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Slovene


text: dogmatizaturorum

title: dogmatizaturorum


text: Category:Panare lemmas

title: Category:Panare lemmas


text: dogmatizaturarum

title: dogmatizaturarum


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Khmer

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Khmer


text: dogmatizaturo

title: dogmatizaturo


text: Category:Alladian nouns

title: Category:Alladian nouns


text: dogmatizaturis

title: dogmatizaturis


text: Category:Alladian lemmas

title: Category:Alladian lemmas


text: dogmatizaturam

title: dogmatizaturam


text: Category:Finnish terms borrowed from Sami languages


text: dogmatizaturos

title: dogmatizaturos


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Frankish

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Frankish


text: dogmatizaturas

title: dogmatizaturas


text: Category:Finnish terms borrowed from Germanic languages


text: dogmatizature

title: dogmatizature


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Albanian

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Albanian


text: dogmatizata

title: dogmatizata


text: Category:Walloon terms inherited from Latin


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Old High German


text: dogmatizati

title: dogmatizati


text: dogmatizatae

title: dogmatizatae


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Tamil

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Tamil


text: dogmatizatorum

title: dogmatizatorum


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Samoan

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Samoan


text: dogmatizatarum

title: dogmatizatarum


text: Category:Latvian terms borrowed from Slavic languages


text: dogmatizatam

title: dogmatizatam


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Faroese

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Faroese


text: dogmatizatos

title: dogmatizatos


text: dogmatizatas

title: dogmatizatas


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Low German

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Low German


text: dolanda

title: dolanda


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Lithuanian

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Lithuanian


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Ilocano

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Ilocano


text: dolandae

title: dolandae


text: dolandorum

title: dolandorum


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Basque

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Basque


text: dolandarum

title: dolandarum


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Middle High German


text: dolandis

title: dolandis


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Ecclesiastical Latin


text: dolandam

title: dolandam


text: dolandos

title: dolandos


text: Category:ba:Female

title: Category:ba:Female


text: dolandas

title: dolandas


text: Category:Misima-Paneati nouns

title: Category:Misima-Paneati nouns


text: dolande

title: dolande


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Tswana

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Tswana


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Swahili

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Swahili


text: dolantes

title: dolantes


text: dolantia

title: dolantia


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Kyrgyz

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Kyrgyz


text: dolantis

title: dolantis


text: Category:Misima-Paneati lemmas

title: Category:Misima-Paneati lemmas


text: dolantium

title: dolantium


text: dolanti

title: dolanti


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Tongan

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Tongan


text: dolante

title: dolante


text: dolantibus

title: dolantibus


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Proto-Indo-Iranian


text: dolantem

title: dolantem


text: Category:Munji nouns

title: Category:Munji nouns


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Sogdian

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Sogdian


text: dolatura

title: dolatura


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Old Tupi

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Old Tupi


text: dolaturum

title: dolaturum


text: dolaturi

title: dolaturi


text: Category:Munji lemmas

title: Category:Munji lemmas


text: dolaturae

title: dolaturae


text: Category:Lithuanian terms borrowed from Slavic languages


text: dolaturorum

title: dolaturorum


text: dolaturarum

title: dolaturarum


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Old Spanish


text: dolaturo

title: dolaturo


text: dolaturis

title: dolaturis


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Mapudungun

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Mapudungun


text: dolaturam

title: dolaturam


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Khitan

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Khitan


text:
ਨੱਕ

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1)  the nose
 * 2)  snivel mucus from the nose
 * 3)  honour, prestige, reputation

title: ਨੱਕ


text: dolaturos

title: dolaturos


text: dolaturas

title: dolaturas


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Gaulish

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Gaulish


text: dolature

title: dolature


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Burmese

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Burmese


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Bulgarian

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Bulgarian


text: dolitura

title: dolitura


text: doliturum

title: doliturum


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Shuar

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Shuar


text: dolituri

title: dolituri


text: doliturae

title: doliturae


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Proto-Balto-Slavic


text: doliturorum

title: doliturorum


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Northern Sami


text: ecfrenatu

title: ecfrenatu


text: doliturarum

title: doliturarum


text: dolituro

title: dolituro


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Classical Syriac


text: dolituris

title: dolituris


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Wolof

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Wolof


text: dolituram

title: dolituram


text: dolituros

title: dolituros


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Shan

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Shan


text: dolituras

title: dolituras


text: Category:Dusner nouns

title: Category:Dusner nouns


text: doliture

title: doliture


text: Category:Walloon terms inherited from Old French


text: Category:Mfumte nouns

title: Category:Mfumte nouns


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Norman

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Norman


text: Category:Dusner lemmas

title: Category:Dusner lemmas


text: domandae

title: domandae


text: domandorum

title: domandorum


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Javanese

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Javanese


text: domandarum

title: domandarum


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Akkadian

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Akkadian


text: domandis

title: domandis


text: Category:Akha terms with IPA pronunciation


text: domandam

title: domandam


text: domandos

title: domandos


text: domandas

title: domandas


text: Category:Mfumte lemmas

title: Category:Mfumte lemmas


text: Category:Nengone terms derived from Indo-European languages


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Fijian

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Fijian


text: domantes

title: domantes


text: domantia

title: domantia


text: Category:Akha nouns

title: Category:Akha nouns


text: domantis

title: domantis


text: Category:Friulian terms inherited from Vulgar Latin


text: domantium

title: domantium


text: domanti

title: domanti


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Maasai

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Maasai


text: Category:Dumi nouns

title: Category:Dumi nouns


text: domantibus

title: domantibus


text: domantem

title: domantem


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Inuktitut

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Inuktitut


text: Category:Akha lemmas

title: Category:Akha lemmas


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Tajik

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Tajik


text: dominatura

title: dominatura


text: dominaturum

title: dominaturum


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Romansch

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Romansch


text: dominaturi

title: dominaturi


text: dominaturae

title: dominaturae


text: Category:Dumi lemmas

title: Category:Dumi lemmas


text: dominaturorum

title: dominaturorum


text: Category:Budibud nouns

title: Category:Budibud nouns


text: dominaturarum

title: dominaturarum


text: dominaturo

title: dominaturo


text: Category:Latvian terms borrowed from Iranian languages


text: dominaturis

title: dominaturis


text: dominaturam

title: dominaturam


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Indonesian

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Indonesian


text: dominaturos

title: dominaturos


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Esperanto

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Esperanto


text: dominaturas

title: dominaturas


text: dominature

title: dominature


text: Category:Budibud lemmas

title: Category:Budibud lemmas


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Quechua

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Quechua


text:
domitura

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) a taming, breaking

title: domitura


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Middle Persian


text: domiturum

title: domiturum


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Egyptian

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Egyptian


text: domituri

title: domituri


text: domiturae

title: domiturae


text: Category:Russian terms borrowed from Turkic languages


text: domiturorum

title: domiturorum


text: domiturarum

title: domiturarum


text:
ਨੁਖਤਾ

Noun

 * 1) the nuqta diacritical dot in Indic scripts

title: ਨੁਖਤਾ


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Turkmen

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Turkmen


text: domituro

title: domituro


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Tagalog

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Tagalog


text: domituris

title: domituris


text: domituram

title: domituram


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Old Czech

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Old Czech


text: domituros

title: domituros


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Bactrian

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Bactrian


text: domituras

title: domituras


text: domiture

title: domiture


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Old Church Slavonic


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Hausa

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Hausa


text: dormiscentes

title: dormiscentes


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Eastern Mari


text: dormiscentia

title: dormiscentia


text: dormiscentis

title: dormiscentis


text: Category:Dahalo lemmas

title: Category:Dahalo lemmas


text: dormiscentium

title: dormiscentium


text: dormiscenti

title: dormiscenti


text: Category:Tedaga lemmas

title: Category:Tedaga lemmas


text: dormiscente

title: dormiscente


text: Category:Ancient Greek terms borrowed from Semitic languages


text: dormiscentibus

title: dormiscentibus


text: dormiscentem

title: dormiscentem


text: Category:Suau nouns

title: Category:Suau nouns


text: Category:Sherbro non-lemma forms

title: Category:Sherbro non-lemma forms


text: dormitanda

title: dormitanda


text: Category:Muya lemmas

title: Category:Muya lemmas


text: Category:Terms derived from Tunisian Arabic


text: dormitandae

title: dormitandae


text: Category:Puinave lemmas

title: Category:Puinave lemmas


text: dormitandorum

title: dormitandorum


text: Category:Mapoyo lemmas

title: Category:Mapoyo lemmas


text: dormitandarum

title: dormitandarum


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Proto-Mon-Khmer


text: dormitandis

title: dormitandis


text: Category:Old Marathi terms derived from Indo-Iranian languages


text: dormitandam

title: dormitandam


text: dormitandos

title: dormitandos


text: dormitandas

title: dormitandas


text: dormitande

title: dormitande


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Old Catalan


text: dormitantes

title: dormitantes


text: Category:Kamasa language

title: Category:Kamasa language


text: dormitantia

title: dormitantia


text: Category:Duala nouns

title: Category:Duala nouns


text: dormitantis

title: dormitantis


text: dormitantium

title: dormitantium


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Greenlandic


text: dormitanti

title: dormitanti


text: Category:Desano terms with IPA pronunciation


text: dormitante

title: dormitante


text: dormitantibus

title: dormitantibus


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Dharug

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Dharug


text: dormitantem

title: dormitantem


text: Category:Daga nouns

title: Category:Daga nouns


text: Category:Central Bai terms by etymology

title: Category:Central Bai terms by etymology


text: dormitatura

title: dormitatura


text: Category:Blagar language

title: Category:Blagar language


text: ecfringendi

title: ecfringendi


text: dormitaturum

title: dormitaturum


text: ecfringendo

title: ecfringendo


text: dormitaturi

title: dormitaturi


text: Category:Tambas nouns

title: Category:Tambas nouns


text: ecfringendum

title: ecfringendum


text: dormitaturae

title: dormitaturae


text: Category:Suau lemmas

title: Category:Suau lemmas


text: ecfractum

title: ecfractum


text: dormitaturorum

title: dormitaturorum


text: Category:Sherbro lemmas

title: Category:Sherbro lemmas


text: ecfractu

title: ecfractu


text: dormitaturarum

title: dormitaturarum


text: dormitaturo

title: dormitaturo


text: Category:Murui Huitoto nouns

title: Category:Murui Huitoto nouns


text: dormitaturis

title: dormitaturis


text: dormitaturam

title: dormitaturam


text: Category:Terms derived from Lü

title: Category:Terms derived from Lü


text: dormitaturos

title: dormitaturos


text: dormitaturas

title: dormitaturas


text: Category:Gan proper nouns

title: Category:Gan proper nouns


text: dormitature

title: dormitature


text: Category:Malinaltepec Tlapanec language

title: Category:Malinaltepec Tlapanec language


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Sukuma

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Sukuma


text: dormitata

title: dormitata


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Old Uyghur

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Old Uyghur


text: dormitati

title: dormitati


text: dormitatae

title: dormitatae


text: Category:Esperanto terms borrowed from Romance languages


text: dormitatorum

title: dormitatorum


text: Category:Kituba terms derived from other languages


text: dormitatarum

title: dormitatarum


text: Category:Northeast Kiwai language

title: Category:Northeast Kiwai language


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Old Breton

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Old Breton


text: dormitatam

title: dormitatam


text: dormitatos

title: dormitatos


text: Category:Kaluli language

title: Category:Kaluli language


text: dormitatas

title: dormitatas


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Middle Armenian


text: Category:Edo terms derived from Volta-Niger languages


text: dulcanda

title: dulcanda


text: Category:Duala lemmas

title: Category:Duala lemmas


text: Category:Desano nouns

title: Category:Desano nouns


text: dulcandae

title: dulcandae


text: dulcandorum

title: dulcandorum


text: Category:Daga lemmas

title: Category:Daga lemmas


text: dulcandarum

title: dulcandarum


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Canadian French


text: dulcandis

title: dulcandis


text: Category:Bamu terms by etymology

title: Category:Bamu terms by etymology


text: dulcandam

title: dulcandam


text: Category:Tambas lemmas

title: Category:Tambas lemmas


text: dulcandos

title: dulcandos


text: dulcandas

title: dulcandas


text: Category:West Uvean terms derived from other languages


text: dulcande

title: dulcande


text: Category:Sha nouns

title: Category:Sha nouns


text: Category:Hamtai language

title: Category:Hamtai language


text: dulcantes

title: dulcantes


text: Category:Minanibai language

title: Category:Minanibai language


text: dulcantia

title: dulcantia


text: dulcantis

title: dulcantis


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Tok Pisin

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Tok Pisin


text: dulcantium

title: dulcantium


text: dulcanti

title: dulcanti


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Proto-Indo-European


text: dulcante

title: dulcante


text: dulcantibus

title: dulcantibus


text: Category:Latin terms borrowed from French


text: dulcantem

title: dulcantem


text: dulcatura

title: dulcatura


text: dulcaturum

title: dulcaturum


text: dulcaturi

title: dulcaturi


text: Category:Kalabari nouns

title: Category:Kalabari nouns


text: dulcaturae

title: dulcaturae


text: Category:Duwet language

title: Category:Duwet language


text: dulcaturorum

title: dulcaturorum


text: dulcaturarum

title: dulcaturarum


text: Category:Drehu terms derived from Indo-European languages


text: dulcaturo

title: dulcaturo


text: Category:Desano lemmas

title: Category:Desano lemmas


text: dulcaturis

title: dulcaturis


text: dulcaturam

title: dulcaturam


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Dalmatian

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Dalmatian


text: dulcaturos

title: dulcaturos


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Aramaic

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Aramaic


text: dulcaturas

title: dulcaturas


text: dulcature

title: dulcature


text: Category:Yagwoia language

title: Category:Yagwoia language


text: Category:Bamu language

title: Category:Bamu language


text: dulcata

title: dulcata


text: Category:Tamanaku nouns

title: Category:Tamanaku nouns


text: dulcati

title: dulcati


text: Category:Hula nouns

title: Category:Hula nouns


text: dulcatae

title: dulcatae


text: Category:Urhobo terms derived from Volta-Niger languages


text: dulcatarum

title: dulcatarum


text: Category:Sha lemmas

title: Category:Sha lemmas


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Tlingit

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Tlingit


text: dulcatam

title: dulcatam


text: Category:Macushi nouns

title: Category:Macushi nouns


text: dulcatos

title: dulcatos


text: dulcatas

title: dulcatas


text: Category:Foreign words of the day in Cantonese


text: dulcescentes

title: dulcescentes


text: Category:Old Armenian terms borrowed from Ancient Greek


text: dulcescentia

title: dulcescentia


text: Category:Kibiri language

title: Category:Kibiri language


text: dulcescentis

title: dulcescentis


text: dulcescentium

title: dulcescentium


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Okinawan

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Okinawan


text: dulcescenti

title: dulcescenti


text: Category:Kalabari lemmas

title: Category:Kalabari lemmas


text: dulcescente

title: dulcescente


text: dulcescentibus

title: dulcescentibus


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Marathi

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Marathi


text: dulcescentem

title: dulcescentem


text: Category:Doura nouns

title: Category:Doura nouns


text: Category:Defaka nouns

title: Category:Defaka nouns


text: dulcificanda

title: dulcificanda