text:
User talk:Ivan Štambuk

If you leave a new message on this page, I will reply on this page unless you ask me to reply elsewhere.

Bad block
I think the length was a bit harsh considering the last blocks were 2 to 3 days long respectively. I recommend shortening them to one week. Thank you. Zeggazo (talk) 09:40, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't really think that anything less would be appropriate due to the severity of the offense. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 10:10, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
 * You have yourself said that it is unreasonable to chastise two established editors with thousands of entries, but since you doubled down on your decision I trust your judgement. Zeggazo (talk) 10:16, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

User_talk:Hippietrail
Hi Ivan,

Re: your post there. I would commit to provide Russian definitions, if you generate Russian entries. I'd prefer to have them a bit simpler than Ukrainian ones, without the split by etymology. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 22:16, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I'll just group them under the same etymology so you split them if necessary. The biggest difficulty is the issue of complexity - there are too many Russian templates with too many parameters, and I have no desire to waste time pattern matching them, so I would use the plain and, so you substitute them with bots or manually. For adjectives situation seems a bit simpler. Do you have some preferred list of missing words (by frequency etc.)? I see that there is a pronunciation-generating module that can be used. Any comprehensive online dictionaries that can be added as a reference? --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 23:02, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, for pronunciation can be used - irregular pronunciations can be added when definitions are added.  is a pretty good dictionary. Perhaps it's better to skip any words with spaces for now. Using  is OK for me, a specific template can be changed later. Appendix:Frequency dictionary of the modern Russian language (the Russian National Corpus) is a frequency list I added. Some words are spelled with "e" for "ё", which is also OK, can be addressed later. Appendix:Russian Frequency lists still have red links too (higher number). You probably need a simpler template for verbs as a temp solution as well. Don't load a very large number of words yet, please. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 23:20, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
 * There are 5289 redlinks on the national corpus appendix page. I can start with nouns (that should account for ~50% of entries) which are the easiest, then adjectives and then verbs, ordered by frequency of occurrence. How many do you want? --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 23:29, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
 * All nouns first :) but I'd like to see some samples first. BTW, that dictionary doesn't provide stresses but ru:wikt does, it's pretty reliable in this, not just for nouns and it redirects to "ё" spellings. Terms with multiple stress patterns, inflections could have two headers. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 23:39, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Don't worry for accents - I have that covered. Can you give examples for nouns with multiple stress patterns? I can also generate definitions if the terms are linked from Wiktionary translation tables as Russian translations, together with a corresponding gloss. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 23:48, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Usually, it's when they are both animate and inanimate, like (here: same headword but two declension tables), such cases can have two headwords for multiple senses in the interim but I'll join them if appropriate. Animacy must be tricky, so just m, f, n or p will do fort the moment. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 23:53, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Got it. I'll get back to you in a day or two once it's done. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 00:11, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

 * The list of missing nouns is here, and stubs (not generated yet) are here. A few hundred stubs are missing and should better be manually generated due to various conflicts. If necessary I can add the genitive and nominative plural forms in the headword as well but they seem unnecessary given the presence of complete declension. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 23:03, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

 * The stubs look great! You can use them. Please add the genitive and nominative plural forms in the headword as well, if genitive=nominative, the 3rd parameter could be - and no inflection table is necessary, like "амплуа" (indeclinable), don't worry if it complicates things. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 23:39, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
 * 125 nouns are missing, I'll add them a bit later since they need special attention (substanvized meanings of adjectives, proper noun conflicts, not in the database and so on). --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 09:06, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: Words with "ё" were created on spellings with "е" by error, even though the entries themselves are spelled with ё, so they have to be moved or redirected to existing entries (if they exist). This wasn't supposed to happen and is apparently due to some behind-the-scenes normalization when uploading. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 11:02, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

 * Thanks a lot! As you can see, I have already fixed a lot - added definitions and made other changes. Words with "ё" as "е" are OK. They can and probably should also have entries but I'm note too eager to work with them since they need manual transliteration. They (words with "е") can't take any stress either since a stress mark and dots over "ё" are considered accents. Note that words with "ё" don't need a stress mark (including the declension table) (that's for future loads). --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 11:20, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Dictionaries nevertheless mark accents on "ё" but I'm fine if it's our convention. I'll clean up these entries manually. In the future stubs will have animacy marked in the gender parameter, and use for uncountable nouns. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 11:25, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

 * If you can determine animacy, that's great. Then I could edit using a definition wizard in many cases. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 11:31, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

 * Extrapolating from the current rate of cleanup, it would take at least 20 days to empty the category. In the meantime I'll focus on other things, and when the category is emptied I'll add the missing nouns, and move to adjectives. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 16:59, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

 * Hi Ivan, the nouns are all done (thanks heaps!), except for one word -, which we don't know (I might delete it). Not all nouns were loaded from the frequency list but that's OK. Could you generate adjectives and adverbs, please? Please don't add stress marks to "ё". If you find adjective declension tables confusing, then don't create them, if you wish to use them I'll give you a guide. :) CC: . --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 23:36, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
 * OK, I'll do the rest of the nouns in a few days, or start adjectives. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 23:39, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

 * I've been caught up in the meatspace so I didn't have time for this, and won't have until the next weekend. However, I've been thinking, and bots are not really worth the periodic hassle when everything is considered. So, would you prefer a file that can be loaded into GoldenDict (the workflow would be: Ctrl+C for lookup of the selected word, copy the preformatted stub from the popup and paste into the wiki editor; could even generate inflection stubs..) or a webpage where you'd need to type the word and copy the result back? I'd prefer a more permanent solution, and not wasting time on inspecting and sanitizing frequency lists (which is editor's job). --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 00:37, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

 * Thank you, Ivan but my preference is the way you did it before with nouns. If it's too time-consuming or hard, don't worry about it. You don't have to do it. Thank you, anyway. :) --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 11:16, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Czech definitionless entries
As for, I object to your mass creation of Czech definitionless entries, should you consider doing that. --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:42, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
 * You are free to ignore them, should I create them. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 08:46, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Serbo-Croatian-Russian false friends
Hi,

I found it amusing, although there are a lot of wrong spellings in Serbo-Croatian and some inaccuracies. Что сербу бабушка, то русскому карась. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 03:58, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Mildly interesting :) --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 06:07, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Pronunciation of Proto-Indo-European laryngeals
I have read enough published articles on proto-indo-european to know that the pronunciation of these consonants is still disputed, but I was just citing one possible pronunciaton that Don Lists in his book. See. Not only does he give a suggested pronunciation of bʰréh₂tēr as /b̤ráx.tɛːr/ (Note the pitch accent), He also gives a pronunciation for h₂éwis (sheep) as [xá.wis] (Again note the pitch accent). I assumed that since there was already a reconstructed pronunciation for Proto-germanic entries, it would be okay to add a reconstructed pronunciation to some of the Proto-Indo-European entries as well even though the pronunciation is not as settled as with Proto-Germanic.
 * Have you read what I wrote on the talkpage? It's [] not //, it's pitch accent (or tone, Ringe is silent as to what acute accent indicates) not stress, syllabification is not indicated (syllables are supraphonemic so indicating them in phonemic transcription is just wrong). For Proto-Germanic, what is indicated appears to be just phonemic transcription bijectively respelled from the reconstruction which is completely redundant. It's wrong to call such pronunciation because reconstructions are not spellings of words of actually spoken language. Given the great deal of dispute regarding the phonetic values of PIE segments, as well as notational inconsistencies (*/bʰréh₂tēr/ should really be *bʰráh₂tēr on a formal level), I'd rather that we don't add them before settling on a system first. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 03:34, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Dan Polansky block
I think it was wrong to block Dan Polansky for a week just because he extended a vote. That seems unreasonable. Blocks should be reserved for edit-warring or vandalism. Pur ple back pack 89  17:07, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
 * I think it's pretty obvious that the vote was extended in hopes that it would attract more opposing votes. One month was plenty of time to vote for anyone interested. Next thing you know he'd be reverting the redirects using the "failed" vote with 70% of pro votes as a source of legitimacy and harassing others about it, despite the fact that pretty much all of the oppose camp are clueless on Chinese and don't edit it. If the vote gets closed now by one week nobody will care about it, and we can prevent that behavior in this particular instance, and in general in the future. Better safe than sorry. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 17:23, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Maybe Dan was wrong. But he shouldn't have been blocked.  My main issue with this block is twofold:
 * You edit-warred with him and then blocked him.
 * There are things that are wrong, and then there are things that are so wrong that somebody should be blocked for them. Bad closures and openings are the former, IMO.

Pur ple back pack 89  21:05, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
 * In principle I agree with you, but but this is more about the big picture. The vote (which was started by him) and the reason why it was extended brings more needless drama around the issue that's pretty much settled by the Chinese editing community. They've done some awesome work recently and I'd hate it seeing their efforts hampered. It's best to sever the serpent's head quickly before it bites and releases its venom. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 21:26, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Look, I'm not a big fan of really long-running discussions either, but blocking is not the answer. Pur ple back pack 89  00:21, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

grysti or '*gryzti ?
How come that we have *grysti instead of ''*gryzti' ?

If this is assmilated then shoud all words suffixed with *orz-, *jьz-, *vъz- be assimilated as well ?

As a mather of fact should all words lacking ь or ъ be completely assimilated ?

p.s I previously ask this at etymology scriptorium but no one seems to bother. What do you think ? 93.139.151.229 00:57, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

 * Neither of them is wrong. *[grysti] is the phonological/surface form, while */gryzti/ is the etymological/underlying form. Some authors prefer the former form while others prefer the latter, depending on the protolanguage. In general Wiktionary prefers the surface form (except when it's against the "tradition"). Yes all reconstructions should be listed in the assimilated form, if there is assimilation. Though I'm not sure if that's such a smart thing to do since the underlying forms are far more prevalent in the literature. IMHO both should be listed in the headword line with a note, and I've added a few such to some PIE appendices where several concurrent phonological processes obscured the underlying form. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 01:05, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

 * So words such as *orzkošь could also be reconstructed as *orskošь ? or past resultative of *orsti as *orslъ alongside *orstlъ ? 93.139.151.229 01:51, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
 * A da za promjenu umjesto retoričkih pitanja mućneš malo tom praznom tikvom i zbrojiš dva i dva? --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 19:34, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

ⰼ
While removing the obsolete <tt></tt> tags, I came across this etymology section of yours, which, to be frank, I don't really understand. Could you clarify what you mean by g' and the like in the entry? Thanks —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 08:14, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
 * (The entry Ⰼ needs the same, of course.) —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 08:18, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I hope it's a bit clearer now. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 08:25, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Ah, I see. Thank you! —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 08:26, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Serbo-Croatian term "prdež"
A Serbian IP address visitor created prdež. Would you like to expand it if you have the time? --Lo Ximiendo (talk) 19:39, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The entry is expanded now, with a more timely assistance of User:Biblbroks. Thank you for notifying me. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 00:55, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

FYI re: klopa
Hi Ivan,

For your attention: Feedback --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 02:39, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I've created the entry but the origin seems obscure. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 00:51, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/marḱ-
No consensus about the 'Altaic/Asiatic' etymology. Would you care to leave a comment to the discussion at WT:ES? Thanks. Hirabutor (talk) 20:53, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
 * OK. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 21:07, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Iotation
Hi Ivan. I see you've been inactive on en.wiki recently. Still, I'd like to ask you to take a look at the long-neglected article Iotation, if you're interested. I tried to rescue it and refocus on the historical iotation, but I'm not an expert, and I'm also a bit confused about synchronic and diachronic aspects of the feature. Thanks. No such user (talk) 10:15, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Kratko pitanje
Ovih dana s Edgarom, Ripperom i Dcirovicem je vođena diskusija oko odabira standarda za B(j)elorusiju kod imenovanja članaka i kategorija. Kojoj bi ti verziji dao prednost da baš moraš birati između dvije? --Orijentolog (talk) 09:44, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Template:R:sa:MW
Are my recent changes to this template acceptable to you? — JohnC5 15:50, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Just because I created the template it doesn't mean I "own" it. The proper venue for discussions involving the template modifications should be its talkpage. Unless you broke something, there is no reason to assume that changes should be objectionable. That being said, now that you've actually touched the template, the curse of Monier-Williams is upon you now, and you must create 1000 sa entries otherwise you're going to receive -10k karma and reincarnate as a sea worm. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 22:37, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I'll take you karmic points under advisement. I'm just trying not to step on anyone's toes. <tt>:)</tt> — JohnC5 04:33, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Sanskrit words
I have been adding information to Sanskrit words and creating some new pages. Can you assess them and suggest me some methods to improve their quality.--Rajasekhar1961 (talk) 13:12, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi. You're doing a nice job. Sanskrit has excellent out-of-copyright resources available for free in a digital form - the massive Monier-Williams dictionary (as well as several others), tagged databases of inflections, several searchable corpora... Almost all of the work could be automated using computer programs. You're probably all doing it manually, which is OK, but a programmer could tap into those resources and make a much better investment productivity-wise. So, for the time being, I suggest focusing on your native language, Telugu, which has much less resources available in English.
 * The only problem with your entries I see is the duplication of work for both roots and the usual citation form for Sanskrit (third-person singular present), e.g. we have both and . Both seem having equal prominence so I'm not sure which one to standardize on. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 16:43, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I know the lack of good resources for Telugu language. Thereby I have requested User:Stephen G. Brown to create a template for C.P.Brown online Telugu-English dictionaries. I am very happy to work on any other online Telugu-English dictionary, If you are aware to give me the link.  About the two similar Sanskrit words. I think the etymology links to be changes indicating  is derived from . Many classical Telugu words are derived from Sanskrit; hence I am linking the etymology of these Telugu words to the actual Sanskrit word. But page for that Sanskrit word is not available. Thereby I am creating that page; to make it clear their relationship. I have started using a Telugu proverbs book of 1868 by Captain M.W.Carr with the English translations: . Can you make a template for this reference. Thank you for the help.--Rajasekhar1961 (talk) 05:44, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
 * It's OK to create the entries for the root. We will have to decide one day whether the root will link back to the third-person singular present form, or vice versa. Semitic languages like Arabic have stubbish entries for roots where several basic meanings are listed (like in this book), and where all of the verbal and nominal derivations are added. Perhaps something similar could be done for Sanskrit. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 08:09, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Regarding the template: see: . --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 08:32, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much sir. I have created about 10 Telugu proverbs and linked them to the Carr template. How are they.--Rajasekhar1961 (talk) 15:11, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
 * They look OK. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 15:41, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Thought this might be related in case you're interested in doing this for Sanskrit: One thing we're trying out is floating categorizing root boxes, so that in addition to root entries, we also have root categories. We have PIE ones that can be placed in any language's entry for a word derived from PIE (see ), and we also have Hebrew ones that are only used within Hebrew itself (see ). You can use in Sanskrit entries and maybe even create a Sanskrit-specific template like the Hebrew one. --WikiTiki89 15:22, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
 * That kind of information should already be available in the etymology section of Sanskrit primary derivations. The use case for PIE root template is to cross-link different languages to the PIE root, which is also redundant if that information is available in the etymology section (which it is for and should be for any other word with a sufficiently deep etymology). What we need is per-language appendices where all of the cognate and akin reflexes in that language are listed, that are related via PIE, in a hierarchical fashion with dating labels (if they are available), not flat categories like Category:Russian terms derived from the PIE root *bʰer-. These would actually make an enjoyable reading. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 15:41, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Ideally you are right. But the difference is that those appendices would require a lot of work, while these categories are very easy to use and maintain, providing a better benifit-to-work ratio. --WikiTiki89 15:52, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Sounds like a challenge. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 16:02, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

I realize that my tone in the current discussion has been rather belligerent. I am entirely conducive to working out some kind of reasonable compromise with respect to terms like mahā and tat tvam asi. They are attested, and should be included in the dictionary in some form. I don't think that it makes sense to call either "English" (or in the case of tat tvam asi to have separate headers calling it English, German, Spanish, and whatever other languages it can be found in), but I am not opposed to having these as Translingual entries or as redirects to the Devanagari script entries. I just want the reader who comes across the term to be able to find it in the dictionary, with suitable etymological information. How, for example, does तत्त्वमसि come to be transliterated as tat tvam asi at all? What do the components तत् त्वम् असि mean in this context? bd2412 T 18:03, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
 * The thing is, neither mahā nor tat tvam asi are proper Sanskrit on their own (though that may be ignored as poorly chosen examples). I see what you are trying to accomplish, but whomever encounters तत्त्वमसि in transcription just needs to look up tattvamasi and it'll come up thanks to the search engine improvements. Those desandhified word-separated forms that can be encountered in isolation or mentioned in FL-works are no different than dumbed-down transcription-only Russian or Arabic in "for dummies" books or tourist guides. tat tvam asi is as Indo-European phrase as you can get - literally "that you are". --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 20:45, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
 * It may be dumbed down, but it's a thing that exists. How about we redirect tat tvam asi to तत्त्वमसि and add a usage note or the like indicating that in some sources तत्त्वमसि is transliterated that way, although there is no formal romanization of the term? That would answer all of my concerns. bd2412 T 21:21, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
 * There exist formal ways of both Devanagari transliteration and Sanskrit transcription. There is even an ISO standard for that. Those redirects would sooner or later crash with existing entries, at which point they would have to be inevitably upgraded to full-blown soft-redirects. Then, someone would think "why not add inflection tables as well - they can be looked up, and should redirect to the base romanization", and after a while we'd have full-blown entries. And then, after xy years someone programmer at the WMF would finally add support for romanizations in the search-box for all non-Latin scripts, and x million entries would have to be deleted. It's just a Sisyphean effort for irrelevant % of users. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 22:01, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't know how we can gauge the relevance. In any case, I am not asking whether we can do this for all Sanskrit transliterations; just for one entry of a phrase of much higher profile than might typically be encountered. I don't see it ever conflicting with another entry. bd2412 T 02:38, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the page
Zdravo - thanks a lot for showing me the tutorial page *handclap*, I try do do better, there are some things I do not understand, see pleas my talk page

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/User_talk:Rasmusklump

Thanks again

Nesuglasice
Da, radio sam članke na Wiktionaryju i nakon što ste me blokirali, ne samo na tu IP adresu već i na neke druge. Svaki članak koji sam napisao a nalazi se na Requests for verification pošteno sam obranio, neke pod svojim imenom, neke pod IP adresom zbog mojeg blokiranja. Nikom ne radim štetu, samo vama zadovoljstvo da možete brisati solidne članke, mnogo bolje od prosječnih na Wiktionaryju. Uvijek se vračam na neki svoj prijašnji članak u svrhu njegova poboljšanja. Wiktionary je internetski rječnik što znači da se u njemu nalaze riječi, fraze pa i rečenice. Kao što sam i prije rekao, kakve veze ima ako je neka riječ novotvorenica i ne koristi se, a nalazi se u rječnicima? Wiktionary nije nekakav popis u kojem bi neke riječi smetale i samo ga produljivale do beskonačnosti. Ja vidim cilj pisanja svih novotvorenica, složenica, rečenica, žargonizama ali ne vidim cilj njihova nepotrebna brisanja. Hvala.
 * kakve veze ima ako je neka riječ novotvorenica i ne koristi se, a nalazi se u rječnicima? - Ima itekako veze, jer nije svakojaki leksički otpad dopušten. Po n-ti put: pogledaj WT:CFI. Izmišljenice, babićizmi i ostalne mentalne onanije wannabe-purista na državnoj sisi stvorenih samo i isključivo u propagandne svrhe, a za koje nema dokaza da se koriste, nisu dopuštene i brišu se. Znam da si poput tipičnog balkanjerosa navikao na bezakonje i savijanje pravila ovisno o dubini poznanstva s lokalnim šerifima, ali to ovdje ne bu išlo. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 14:57, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Ovo što sam pročitao je divno. Ja živim na području sjeverno od Save a to nije Balkan. Nemoj u ovo mješati politiku. Bez obzira na to što sam domoljub ne volim političare, Tuđmana, i 99% Hrvata, već gledam hrvatske uspjehe kroz povijest. Večina riječi o kojima sam ja radio članke su provedene na državne natječaje u 21. stoljeću i naravno te su riječi pobijedile na natječajima. Nikada nisam, nikada neću stavljati nikakav leksički odpad, ma što to bilo. Po meni leksički otpad su turcizmi i mađarizmi, a ima obilje tog otpada na Wiktionaryju. Radim samo one članke koji zaslužuju biti u kvalitetnom i skupom rječniku. Hvala.
 * Balkan je društveno-politički a ne samo geografski pojam. Imaš to lijepo opisano u knjigi Marije Todorove. Moš ti živit i na Mjesecu, ali ako i dalje geni kameni progovaraju kroz djela i rječi džaba sve. Lijepo se kitit perjem neke fitkivne evropske zajednice, ali kad zagrebeš oglancanu površnu i iz nje ispuže smrdljivi talog korupcije i nazadnjaštva, to je pravi indikator da se ništa nije promijenilo. Ne znam o kakvim uspjesima pričaš kad Hrvatska kao država nije postojala prije 1991. Prije toga službeni jezik je bio srpskohrvatski, prije toga srpskohrvatskoslovenski, a prije toga se pisalo i govorilo gomilom međusobno nerazumljivih dijalekata koji nasreću neumoljivo umiru. Ti natječaji za "najbolji novi neologizam" su simptom jedne dublje patologije - nemogućnost kreativnog izražavanja u javnoj sferi uslijed nesmiljenog jezičnog fašizma koje propagandiziraju legije lektora i purista, što dovodi do takvih prdaca u prazno gdje jezična praksa ne prati medijsku pompu. Ako hoćeš raditi popise jezičnih neuspješnica napravi blog; te riječi su ovdje nepoželjne iz jednostavnog razloga što ih nitko ne koristi, a korištenje je preduvjet inkluzije. Meni je zanimljivo kako su domoljubi istovremeno navodni mrzitelji "totalitarizma" i istovremeno se zdušno zalažu za istu jednoumnu politiku s drugim predznakom. Nekad su progonili hrvatizme danas jednakom žestinom i argumentima turcizme i anglizme. Džaba ste krečili petokraku šahovnicom, jednako vonja. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 15:47, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Ovo sve si čuo od svojih roditelja ili? Vi kao da pročitate samo moju prvu rečenicu. Ne podnosim politiku, fašizam, nacizam, boljševizam, totalitarizam, komunizam, kapitalizam niti išta vezanu uz politiku. Hrvatski su tu od stoljeća sedmog. Wiktionary ima srpskohrvatski zbog velike sličnosti u volabularu, jer bi inače trebali postojati zasebni članci na hrvatskom, srpskom, bosanskom i crnogorskom jeziku. Hrvatska je imala velike vojne uspjehe od borbe s Tatarima, Mađarima, Talijanima, Mlečanima, Venečanima, Turcima, Srbima, Nijemcima, Avarima, Francima, Francuzima itd. Zanima me samo napredak, a uz politiku nema napredka kao niti uz pričanje jesili fašist, nacist, komunist ili slično što je također politika. Prvo što pogledam u rječniku su upravo hrvatske zamjene za strane riječi. Ako pričamo hrvatskim jezikom onda to mora biti suvremeni jezik s vokabularom u duhu hrvatskoga jezika. Druga opcija je da svi priamo istim jezikom iako Esperanti, Ido i Interlingua se nisu pokazali uspješnima. Upravo zbok ljudi poput tebe Wiktionaryju treba cijelo desetljeće da se poveća za milijun novih pojmova. Hvala.
 * Hrvati su fiktivni kontrukt, isto ko i svaki narod. Od stoljeća sedmog tu su slavenska plemana koja su izvršila genocid domorodaca, i pomalo okrupnjivala kroz političke konstrukte stvorene kako bi konsolidirali političku moć malobrojne nasljedne elite. Svaka nacija je stvorena na genocidu i propagandi. Nije to "velika sličnost u vokabularu", to je jedan te isti jezik s minornim razlikama u vokabularu (vidiš kako Okamov rez lagano razriješu tu nepremostivu dilemu). Te borbe što spominješ nije radila Hrvatska (koja tad nije postojala) nego drugi politički entiteti s drugim nazivima. Bespredmetno je retroaktivno projicirati imaginarne političke konstrukte kako bi se legitimizirala surova sadašnjost. Suvremene suverene nacije-države su izmišljene kako bi spriječile vječne bratoubilačke ratove između velikih evropskih sila, a za nacije izmišljene u 19. stoljeću naovamo (manje-više 90% njih) to je sve bajka kako se ne bi osjećali jadni i nebitni, što i objektino i jesu. Samo ti gledaj zamjene za "strane riječi" i u "duhu hrvatskog jezika" izvađene s kojekakvih jezičnih natječaja, a za koje niko nikad nije čuo, samo nemoj ostatak civiliziranog svijeta silovati s tim glupostima. Kad ih ljudi počnu koristiti onda se vrati i možeš ih dodati. U međuvremenu probaj hrvatsku kikirikipediju - tamo imaš nacionalističkih pacijenata ko pljeve koji će te primiti otvorenih ruku. Zbog ljudi poput mene Wiktionary i postoji - beskompronisnih utjerivača istine koji gaze i rasplinjuju maglu laži i obmana. Drago mi je da si se pridružio štovateljima mog lika i djela, daj mi adresu poslat ću ti potpisanu razglednicu. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 16:46, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Opet politika. Ti si neki bivši prosvjetljeni političar ili? Ja sam za jednu jedinstvenu naciju bez granica, bez županija, oblasti, krajina, država, pokrajina ili sličnoga ipak smo svi mi ljudi s istog planeta. Bio sam na Hrvatskoj Wikipediji pa su me blokirali nekoliko puta bez obzira na moje doprinose. Riječi koje pišem pišem iz razloga da ih ljudi počnu koristiti čim čujem neku novu riječ koja je zamjena za stranu počnem je koristiti odmah. Vidim da si anglofil i vidim da ne voliš Hrvate i bilo što slično. Predzadnja rečenica ti je urnebesna, dobro da nisi rekao da si nepobjedivi car koji vlada svijetom hobita. Puno si se zanjeo s pričanjem i koristi malo manje politički riječnik. Ako ti nešto nije jasno pročitaj moje prijašnje poruke ovdje gore i pročitaj ih ovaj puta u potpunosti. Što se tiče adrese ne hvala, a osim toga ne dobivam razglednice očiti ih poštar krade. Hvala.
 * Nacija je po definiciji ekskluzivna zajednica i moraju postojati demarkacijske linije, stvarne (granice) ili fiktivne (vjera). Ako i ne postoje bit će generirani od strane evolucije jer se na taj način stvara konflikt koji proizvodi mogućnost odabira (fitness funkcija). Suprotno od ljubavi nije mržnja nego indiferentnost - za "Hrvate" me boli briga koliko i za koloniju lišajeva. Drago mi je da ti se moje proročanske izjave permnanentno urezuju u pamćenje, razmišljao sam o izdavanju knjige memoara i taj paragraf je svakako u najužem izboru. Mislio sam na elektroničku adresu, pužopoštu još koriste samo zakonski obveznici i informatički nepismeni starkelje. Nismo zaboga u Hrvatskom saboru. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 17:05, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Molim te nemoj pisati knjigu ljudima će isprati mozak. Nisam vjernik, a I mene boli briga za Hrvate - ne. Za koloniju lišajeva ne znam. Još malo I ovako ćemo moći napisati četiri Biblije. Elektroničku adresu dajem samo ako predložim neku novu hrvatsku riječ, koju uglavnom ne private. kako biste mi bali elektronički potpis omi toga? U pamčenje mi se urezuju samo stvari koje me zanimaju ili gluposti u ovom slučaju to su gluposti. trebao bi se početi ponašati u skladu barem s prosječnim ake ne i u skladu s iznadprosječnom osobom, a ne kao Tinky Winky - kralj teletabisa.
 * Ne bih mogao pisati Bibliju, ne volim baš priče za djecu i pagansku povijest. Osim Grimmovih čije pak morbidne metafore o sakaćenju mi uvijek zagolicaju sociopatsku maštu. Tu kukaš a zapravo mazohistički uživaš u verbalnom silovanju. Možda je bolje da se ipak držiš izmišljanja riječi koje nitko nikada neće koristiti - ne želim zakinuti ljudsku rasu za tvoj neopisiv doprinos napretku. --Ivan Štambuk (talk)
 * Mogu reći da uživam u ovakvim razgovorima. Neznam što zovete verbalnim silovanjem. Nisam niti pomislio da bi smo mogli pisati Bibliju već da bi smo mogli napisati tekst duljine četiri Biblije. Isto su tako ljudi govorili da se mobiteli nikada neće koristiti, da se riječi zrakoplov, računalo, tipkovnica i pravopis neće koristiti. svako pridonosi napretku samo neki zakidaju napredak (vi) a neki pridonose napretku (ja). Ponovno ste skrenuli temu s rječi na neku 987967,95. stvar. Više razmišljajte o onome o čemu se trenutno bavite a ne o bajkama i pričama za djecu. Hvala.
 * Pa realno nitko ne koristi kolokvijalno te riječi - avion, aerodrom, tastatura, kompjuter se koriste 100x više. Jezični fašisti lektoriraju i lektoriraju, ali tupavi lijeni narod se ne dâ. Jedini napredak na Balkanu jest otvaranje onih imagiranih linija na karti da i ono malo pametnih što je ostalo si dâ petama vjetra, što dalje od trule žabokrečine. Pazi da se prenapregneš od tog silnog umovanja, mada mi je to sumnjivo nešto - nacionalisti i slijepi sljeditelji regula koje propisuju samozvani autoriteti nemaju odveć razvijene kognitivne sposobnosti, te se njihovo razmišljanje većma reducira ne uglavnom subliminalno opetovanje stečenog sintetičkog znanja. Razmišljanje obuhvaća isključivo kreativan čin sinteze novog i neotkrivenog, što je postupak rezervan isključivo za kognitarijat 21. stoljeća - programere i popratnu svitu. Ostali mehaničari su osuđeni da tapkaju u mraku dok se na kraju ne pretvore u humane životinje u kavezu koje bleje kroz rešetke svijeta koji ne razumiju. Slično kao kad uzmeš mobitel ili kompjuter i zabuljiš se u ekran, pa tu neki pikseli i prozorčići skaču na stotoj razini apstakcije, dok ti neki klinjo prazni kartični račun i preprodaje identitet u tamnim kutcima Interneta. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 19:15, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

*(dʰ)ǵʰmṓ form
Howdy. I was just adding some citations to, and if the Celtic (and especially Gaulish) forms are to be believed, it seems like we might need to add the *dʰ back. What do you think? It would also be great if we could get work on the declension. — JohnC5 02:33, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Celtic *gdonyo- is not a reflex of that reconstruction, but of another derivation from the "earth" word. It should be created on a separate page. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 08:32, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Now that you point that out, it is very clearly a *-ye/o- derivative. I must have been drunk last night. I'll fix it when I get home. Also, the LIN may have something to say on this matter. — JohnC5 12:46, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
 * It indeed does: . Germans are very thorough. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 13:27, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Special:Contributions/Stanacni
Could you please check this out? Thanks —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 05:34, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Special:Contributions/BrunoMed
He's finally back again. If there's anything that is obviously and demonstrably non-CFI-compliant on grounds that have already been explained to him, I'd say he needs another block in excess of 3 months. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 05:55, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for notifying me. Some of these words are legitimate, some haven't been used for a century, but some have no history of actual usage. Since he has already been told that he cannot just add words from proposed words list without researching whether they've been used, a lengthier blocks is certainly due. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 11:19, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for being my SC go-to resource; I can never tell what level of troll/politically-minded individual I might be dealing with when it comes to patrolling some of the languages around here. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 17:29, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Problemi
Svi članci koje sam napravio, a vi izbrisali imali su poštene izvore na internetu. Nije moj problem što brišete članke zato što imate očitih problema, očito ste dvadeset godina čistili govna poštenih Hrvata, pa vam nisu dobro mirišala, a sada čistite govna Amerikanaca. Ali ja se ispričavam, iako ne možete govoriti o suradnicima kao u naslovu gore. Mogli ste me i lijepo zamoliti da se povučem s Wiktinarya. Puštam vas da nastavite primitivizirati Wiktionary i internet. Hvala.
 * Nema na čemu, zadovoljstvo je u potpunosti moje. Uzgredice, intelektualna koprofagija mi nije mrska; dapače. To što se ti praviš retaj ko tipični balkanjeros ("ako prođe, prođe") nakon što ti je tri puta objašnjeno da je jedini relevantan kriterij ne "izvori" već upotrebne potvrde, nije moj problem. Ako ti se ne sviđaju pravila otvori diskusiju da se promjene, inače ih slijedi a ako nećeš letiš.--Ivan Štambuk (talk) 13:47, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Vidim opet upotrebljavaš neke balkanske izraze, pusti Balkan. Sve, u potpunosti sve hrvatske riječi na Wiktionaryju o kojima sam napiso članke ja sam upotrebljavao. Brži sam od interneta, a i točniji. Ako ti smeta to što se bavim hrvatskim jezikom, a ti očito imaš problema s Hrvatima, zanemari ih. Hvala.
 * Ma naravno da si ih upotrebljavao gosp. Svizac, samo si ti bitan i nitko više. Da me briga za mentalne proljeve intelektualne paprati otišao bih u Maticu hrvatsku, ali jednostavnije je pustiti vodu i pustiti da štakori odrade svoj dio posla. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 17:20, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Sad dosta šale, odblokiraj me i bok.
 * Ako želiš doprinositi na projektu moraš dati do znanja da razumiješ pravila, i da shodno istima nećeš više dodavati izmišljenice nepotvrdive u upotrebi u permanentnim medijima (što isključuje Web). --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 20:14, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Ne ću dodavati više nikakve izmišljenice, držat ću se velikih rječnika. Hvala.

A problem
This edit created an error, because 35FF is not a valid page number. Would you please kindly fix it, thank you. --kc_kennylau (talk) 16:53, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
 * And this edit also. --kc_kennylau (talk) 16:54, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
 * And this edit also. --kc_kennylau (talk) 16:56, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
 * And this edit also. --kc_kennylau (talk) 16:57, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Please kindly fix those Old-Church Slavonic entries in Category:ParserFunction errors. --kc_kennylau (talk) 16:57, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

 * Ask the person who screwed up the template. When I added it, it was working properly. Also, don't make gazillion different talk page edits within a short timespan - each one produces a separate e-mail notification. It's annoying. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 17:00, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I apologize. But what does the "f"s mean? --kc_kennylau (talk) 18:53, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
 * See the usage note at f. and ff.. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 18:57, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

He did it again
-- Romanophile ♞ (contributions) 19:19, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Î==dosad==

May I ask you to have a look at my contribution of dosad and dosada if I made mistakes? I have added the 2nd meaning of dosada. Thank you. Rasmusklump (talk) 16:05, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

царь, cesar < 𐌺𐌰𐌹𐍃𐌰𐍂
Zdravo, Ivane! Dok sam pazio zadnje promene, primetih da ovaj korisnik: je uklonio informaciju da slavenske riječi царь, cesar etc. potiču iz gotske riječi 𐌺𐌰𐌹𐍃𐌰𐍂, kako si to dodao. Hteo sam da poništim promenu, ampak sam pomislio da možda nehotice uklonim korisnu informaciju, ako ona postoji u njegovoj promeni, pa zato dodajem ovde vezu da bi mogao da središ članak. Pozdrav, The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 12:28, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

P.S. Još puno promena ovog korisnika su bile poništene (drugim korisnicima). Možda su njegove promene većinom nekorisne (ja to ne mogu oceniti uopće)? The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 12:28, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Ostavih mu napomenu na kartici za razgovor. Ta rekonstruckija je dosta zeznuta i po pitanju oblika i porijekla, potrudit ću se ažurirati etimologiju. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 12:55, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
 * My god, the etymology for this is confusing. Following Pronk-Tiethoff, I have at least removed the claims of a Gothic descent from all entries, since there is nothing to prove it. But there seem so many Slavic forms derived differently here, it's labyrinthine. — Mnemosientje (t · c) 22:24, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Jezicni dezinformator
Ti zapravo prpovodis jezicne dezinformacije. Da li ti jos nije dosadilo? --Croq (talk) 20:57, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Em si nepismen, em čitaš bez razumijevanja. Jalovo kmečanje i frizirane optužbe neće negirati kako lingvističku realnost, tako ni tvoj nedostatak poznavanja književnog jezika. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 21:15, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
 * hahaha, see you --Croq (talk) 23:00, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

...soon--Croq (talk) 23:00, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Kak ti ide aktivizam?--Croq (talk) 21:23, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Variant of Serbo-Croatian?
Hi Ivan, what variant or dialect of Serbo-Croatian do you speak, and/or is a native language? – AWESOME meeos ！ *  (chōmtī hao /t͡ɕoːm˩˧.tiː˩˧ haw˦˥/) 06:00, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Ivan doesn't seem to have been responding much lately, but I think Ivan speaks Ijekavian Croatian. --WikiTiki89 16:08, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Semitic
I see you have done some really excellent work on comparative Semitic. Where have you gotten all of this data from? No where else have I see all of the orthographic forms given. What do you see as the areas that still need expansion? I am thinking of putting some time into Semitic and want guidance about where the investment is most needed. --Tibetologist (talk) 14:48, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Ivan hasn't been around for a long time. Anyway, given your username, we could really use some help with Tibetan, but if you want to do Semitic, the opportunities are rife there as well. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 14:57, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
 * See Appendix:List of Proto-Semitic stems and references, namely the Militarev & Kogan's Semitic Etymological Dictionary, as well AHD's Semitic roots appendix (I thinks it's linked on the archive.org mirror in at least one of the appendices). Apparently About Proto-Semitic is still absent; I suggest as the first steps to research notational variants and phonological inventory in major sources and list it therein. Also do a search on Google Books or academia.edu (for PDFs) and sort by date, it's easy to find newer reference works like . Semitic languages are PITA due to various ill-designed scripts though. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 09:52, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Template (R:te:Carr)
Thank you very much for creating the Template:. I have been using this to create pages about Telugu proverbs. This is actually a supplement to the main book. Can you create a separate template for the main book here:. Thanking you once again.--Rajasekhar1961 (talk) 08:06, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

Blokiran od strane SemperBlotto
Poštovani prijatelju iz susjedne države. Vaš kolega i administrator SemperBlotto je bio iznimno nepristojan prema meni. Za moj veliki uloženi trud u dodavanju znanja vezano uz temu "eutheism" konstantno mi je obrisao što sam probao učiniti. Zatim, nakon mnogo...mnogo pokušaja, vaš administrator me je blokirao i citirao kao razlog "Adding nonsense/gibberish" Na ovo mogu samo reći da nije dovoljno educiran na tu temu o kojoj sam pričao te da nema nikakvo pravo tako nešto navesti kao razlog... Poslat ću vam sa ovog accounta jer me potpuno blokirao da išta radim na ovoj web stranici. Molio bi da pogledate u to (pisano s mobitela, prepisivano s kompjutera čitav link).

Hvala vam lijepo, Ugodan dan vam želim Uwotm8meow (talk) 08:49, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Je li te tvoj "dobri bog" učio da prijetiš tužbama? --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 09:03, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Ne, samo sam bio iznimno ljut jer me vaš kolega nije htio revizionirati niti pomoći u uređivanju stranice. Doslovno sam prvi put ovdje, jer ne znam kako drugačije, niti gdje, proširiti ovo znanje. Znači... prvi put sa ovakvim tipom uređivanja sam ikad se susreo, te ja nemam pojma programirat i čitav ovaj jezik je iznimno zbunjujuć za ne-programera.

Kao što vidite neznam sa ovom web stranicom vladati kako treba, ako vas zanima komentar na ovo, pogledajte "edit" gore Uwotm8meow (talk) 09:15, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

I najiskrenije, ne želim više da moram ovdje biti, radite šta hoćete dragi ljudi na wiktionaryju... Imam posla na dnevnoj bazi... Uwotm8meow (talk) 09:19, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Oprosti, mislio sam da si iz Srbije, a ne iz Hrvatske... Ah...niš... pozdrav iz Osijeka ak ništa drugo... Uwotm8meow (talk) 09:31, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Više varijanti za akcentovanje nekih reči u srpskohrvatskom
Zdravo,

Šta misliš da bi trebalo da radimo kod reči gde postoji više mogućnosti akcentovanja, kao što je slučaj reči "emocija" (emócija ili èmocija) ili "nije" (níje ili nȋje)? Mislim da head= ne može da sadrži više od jednog izgovora, pa da li be onda trebalo samo da se druga varijanta navodi pod "usage notes" i "pronunciation"? Nisam znao koga drugog da pitam. Saimdusan (talk) 06:27, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

श्याम
Hi, A long time ago you contributed an etymology for the Sanskrit word श्याम. I would love to know the source for this. Thanks. Jayarava (talk) 07:39, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Ivan Štambuk hasn't been active since June 2019. Pls separate topics making a new 2 header. You can try WT:RT or WT:ES for the word. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 08:00, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

How we will see unregistered users
Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:14, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ivan Štambuk


text: choliba

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: choliba


text:
потпетица

Noun

 * 1) heel (shoe)

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) heel (part of shoe)

title: потпетица


text:
opričati

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  talk about, talk over, discuss (talk about a specific topic)

title: opričati


text:
опричати

Etymology
From.

title: опричати


text:
paćenik

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) martyr
 * 2) sufferer

title: paćenik


text:
паћеник

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) martyr
 * 2) sufferer

title: паћеник


text:
pačji

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1)  duck; duck's

title: pačji


text:
пачји

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) duck's, of a duck, duck-

title: пачји


text:
paleozoik

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) Paleozoic

title: paleozoik


text:
палеозоик

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) Paleozoic

title: палеозоик


text:
палмин

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1)  palm, palm tree

title: палмин


text:
pametno

Etymology
From and.

Adverb

 * 1) intelligently, prudently, reasonably, wisely

title: pametno


text:
паметно

Adverb

 * 1) smartly, cleverly, intelligently

Etymology
From.

Adverb

 * 1) intelligently, prudently, reasonably, wisely

title: паметно


text:
pamfletist

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) pamphleteer, lampoonist

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) pamphleteer

title: pamfletist


text:
памфлетист

Noun

 * 1) pamphleteer

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) pamphleteer

title: памфлетист


text:
cứu cánh

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) result; outcome
 * 2) goal; something to achieve
 * 3)  salvation; rescue

Usage notes
Sense 3 is a common misapplication, resulting from a reanalysis of this word by the etymologically unaware, who associate it with.

Verb

 * 1)  to save; to rescue; to salvage

title: cứu cánh


text:
pamtivijek

Etymology
From, +.

Noun

 * 1) antiquity, ancient times

title: pamtivijek


text:
памтивијек

Etymology
From, +.

Noun

 * 1) antiquity, ancient times

title: памтивијек


text:
pamtivek

Etymology
From, +.

Noun

 * 1) antiquity, ancient times

title: pamtivek


text:
памтивек

Etymology
From, +.

Noun

 * 1) antiquity, ancient times

title: памтивек


text:
vị tha

Etymology
.

Adjective

 * 1) altruistic; unselfish; selfless

Usage notes

 * Since can also mean "to forgive", this word can be misconstrued (often humorously) as "tolerant".

title: vị tha


text:
vị kỉ

Etymology
.

Adjective

 * 1)  selfish

title: vị kỉ


text:
رسالة

Noun

 * 1) message
 * 2) letter message
 * 1) letter message

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) message
 * 2) letter
 * 3) SMS

title: رسالة


text:
məktub

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) letter (message)

title: məktub


text:
ispatiti

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to suffer much, to have (had) one's share of suffering

title: ispatiti


text:
испатити

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to suffer much, to have (had) one's share of suffering

title: испатити


text:
চিঠি

Etymology
From. Cognate with 🇨🇬

Noun

 * 1) letter

Etymology
, from,. Cognate with 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬 /, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, and 🇨🇬 /.

Noun

 * 1) letter (message)

title: চিঠি


text:
စာ

Etymology 1
From. Cognate with,. Compare 🇨🇬,.

Noun

 * 1) writing
 * 2) letter written or printed communication
 * 3)  written language

Etymology 2
. Compare 🇨🇬 and 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1)  sparrow

Etymology
From. Cognate with 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1) to sell

title: စာ


text:
paleografija

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) paleography

title: paleografija


text:
палеографија

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) paleography

title: палеографија


text:
จดหมาย

Etymology
🇰🇲

Noun

 * 1) letter (message)

title: จดหมาย


text:
paleontološki

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) paleontological

Adverb

 * 1) paleontologically

title: paleontološki


text:
палеонтолошки

Adjective

 * 1) paleontological

Adverb

 * 1) paleontologically

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) paleontological

Adverb

 * 1) paleontologically

title: палеонтолошки


text:
paleontologija

Etymology
Borrowed from other European languages, ultimately a combination of roots from.

Noun

 * 1) paleontology

Etymology
From +  +.

Noun

 * 1) paleontology

title: paleontologija


text:
палеонтологија

Noun

 * 1) paleontology

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) paleontology

title: палеонтологија


text:
zlopatiti

Etymology
+

Verb

 * 1)  have a difficult life, live a hard life

title: zlopatiti


text:
злопатити

Etymology
+

title: злопатити


text:
propatiti

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to suffer (a great deal)

title: propatiti


text:
пропатити

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to suffer (a great deal)

title: пропатити


text:
napatiti

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to make (one) suffer, cause (one) suffering
 * 2)  to suffer much, have (had) one's share of suffering

title: napatiti


text:
напатити

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to make (one) suffer, cause (one) suffering
 * 2)  to suffer much, have (had) one's share of suffering

title: напатити


text:
pancir

Etymology
From or.

Noun

 * 1) mail armor
 * 2) bullet-proof vest

title: pancir


text:
панцир

Noun

 * 1) armour

Etymology
From or.

Noun

 * 1) mail armor
 * 2) bullet-proof vest

title: панцир


text:
pancirka

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) bullet-proof vest

title: pancirka


text:
панцирка

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) bullet-proof vest

title: панцирка


text:
paničarka

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) panic monger female

title: paničarka


text:
વિમાન

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) aeroplane, airplane, plane
 * 2)  vimana

title: વિમાન


text:
паничарка

Noun

 * 1) female panicker

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) panic monger female

title: паничарка


text:
panslavist

Etymology
Probably borrowed from, equivalent to. First attested in 1847, but not common until the 1860s.

Noun

 * 1) Panslavist
 * 2) * 1847 July 11 & 12, "Buitenlandsche berigten. Rusland", Nederlandsche Staats-courant, No. 162, quoting the Augsburg Allgemeine Zeitung.
 * "nl"

- Men hoopt, dat deze les de zoogenaamde Panslavisten in Rusland voor langen tijd den lust zal doen verliezen om hunne hersenschimmige plannen te vervolgen.

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) Panslavist

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) Panslavist

title: panslavist


text:
панславист

Noun

 * 1) Panslavist

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) Panslavist

title: панславист


text:
panslavistički

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) Panslavic

Adverb

 * 1) as a Panslavist

title: panslavistički


text:
панславистички

Adjective

 * 1) Panslavic

Adverb

 * 1) in the spirit of panslavism

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) Panslavic

Adverb

 * 1) as a Panslavist

title: панславистички


text:
almazarrón

Noun

 * 1) ; red ochre, ruddle

title: almazarrón


text:
panslavizam

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) Pan-Slavism

title: panslavizam


text:
панславизам

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) Pan-Slavism

title: панславизам


text:
pantljika

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  ribbon, band

title: pantljika


text:
пантљика

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  ribbon, band

title: пантљика


text:
Mankind

Etymology
From, , translated from Arabic.

Proper noun

 * 1)  The 114th sura (chapter) of the Quran

title: Mankind


text:
hogaril

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  hearth, fireplace

title: hogaril


text: hogariles

title: hogariles


text: User:M. Adiputra/Balinese Swadesh list

title: User:M. Adiputra/Balinese Swadesh list


text:
arbeidsgiver

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) an employer

title: arbeidsgiver


text:
դարանակալել

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to ambush, to waylay, to lie in wait

title: դարանակալել


text:
lietadlo

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) aeroplane, airplane, plane

title: lietadlo


text: arbeidsgiveren

title: arbeidsgiveren


text: arbeidsgivere

title: arbeidsgivere


text: arbeidsgiverne

title: arbeidsgiverne


text:
གནམ་གྲུ

Noun

 * 1) aircraft, aeroplane, airplane, plane

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) aircraft, aeroplane, airplane, plane

title: གནམ་གྲུ


text:
arbeidstaker

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) an employee

title: arbeidstaker


text:
paranoičan

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) paranoid

title: paranoičan


text:
параноичан

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) paranoid

title: параноичан


text:
parazitologija

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  parasitology

title: parazitologija


text:
паразитологија

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  parasitology

title: паразитологија


text:
parazitološki

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) parasitological

title: parazitološki


text: arbeidstakeren

title: arbeidstakeren


text:
паразитолошки

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) parasitological

title: паразитолошки


text:
parazitski

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) parasitic

Adverb

 * 1) parasitically

title: parazitski


text:
паразитски

Adjective

 * 1) parasitic

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) parasitic

Adverb

 * 1) parasitically

title: паразитски


text: arbeidstakere

title: arbeidstakere


text: arbeidstakerne

title: arbeidstakerne


text:
partijski

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1)  political party

Adverb

 * 1) as a political party, or a as a member thereof

title: partijski


text:
партијски

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1)  political party

Adverb

 * 1) as a political party, or a as a member thereof

title: партијски


text:
lā noa

Noun

 * 1) weekday

title: lā noa


text:
pasjaluk

Etymology
From, i.e. meaning "as if like an (evil or rabid) dog".

Noun

 * 1)  malevolence, malice, nefariousness

title: pasjaluk


text:
пасјалук

Etymology
From, i.e. meaning "as if like an (evil or rabid) dog".

Noun

 * 1)  malevolence, malice, nefariousness

title: пасјалук


text:
pastorak

Etymology
(🇨🇬).

Noun

 * 1) stepchild stepson or stepdaughter

title: pastorak


text:
пасторак

Etymology
(🇨🇬).

Noun

 * 1) stepchild stepson or stepdaughter

title: пасторак


text:
arbeidstager

Etymology
From.

title: arbeidstager


text: arbeidstageren

title: arbeidstageren


text: arbeidstagere

title: arbeidstagere


text:
Reichshofrat

Etymology
From.

Proper noun

 * 1)  the Aulic Council of the Austrian Empire

title: Reichshofrat


text: arbeidstagerne

title: arbeidstagerne


text: Category:Norwegian Bokmål terms suffixed with -tager


text:
めちゃくちゃ

Etymology
This etymology is hypothetical. Since that shifted to  by, there may be an idea raised that a  ("ruined tea" or thus, "wrongly prepared tea") would be a  ("bitter tea"), which would also favor the sense of four-character idioms or.

Adjective

 * 1) absurd, unreasonable, illogical
 * 2) incoherent, disorderly, messy
 * 3) * 1818,, Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus, Japanese translation by Giichi Shishido
 * 4) reckless, excessive
 * 1) reckless, excessive

 * 1) ruined, destroyed

Adverb

 * 1) very, really
 * 2) * 1914-17,, , Japanese translation by Yū Ōkubo
 * 1) * 1914-17,, , Japanese translation by Yū Ōkubo

title: めちゃくちゃ


text: Reichsrath

title: Reichsrath


text: Category:Norwegian Bokmål terms suffixed with -taker


text:
sibeliusryppy

Etymology
🇰🇲, named after

Noun

 * 1) vertical wrinkle between the eyebrows.

title: sibeliusryppy


text:
Reconstruction:Proto-Slavic/pa-

Etymology
Cognate with 🇨🇬.

According to Rejzek (2006) the original meaning was "later, secondary" since the primary evidence for the Slavic words for step-children is inconclusive.

Prefix

 * 1) later, secondary
 * 2)  false, pseudo-

Descendants

 * East Slavic:
 * South Slavic:
 * West Slavic:
 * Sorbian:
 * South Slavic:
 * West Slavic:
 * Sorbian:
 * West Slavic:
 * Sorbian:
 * West Slavic:
 * Sorbian:
 * West Slavic:
 * Sorbian:
 * Sorbian:
 * Sorbian:
 * Sorbian:
 * Sorbian:

title: Reconstruction:Proto-Slavic/pa-


text:
User talk:62.168.13.98

Czech Rep vs. Czechia
Replacing translations of terms as Czech Republic with Czechia is inadvisable, since the latter is rare. Mapping a short form such as Tjeckien to Czechia seems natural, but not the best course of action, IMHO. --Dan Polansky (talk) 10:18, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
 * piš česky, nerozumím, co chce básník říct.
 * Dobře. Řekněme že nemumíte moc anglicky a tedy musím česky. Tedy "Czechia" je slovo jež se téměř nepoužítá, proto to není dobrý překlad pro Tjeckien. Ano Tjeckien je krátká forma stejně jako "Czechia", ale to není rozhodující; rozhodující je aby se obvyklá forma mapovala na obvyklou formu. --Dan Polansky (talk) 10:40, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Váš anglický text jsem si přeložil, ale nechápu ho. Stejně jako český názor. Váš názor je prostě chybný. Jak jste přišel na to, že Czechia (Česko) se v angličtině téměř nepoužívá? V medicínské databázi PubMed je 407 článků v angličtině s Czechia: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=czechia, databáze Google Scholar našla skoro 9000 záznamů s Czechia: http://scholar.google.cz/scholar?hl=cs&q=czechia&btnG= Navíc tady nejde o nějaké mapování, ale o slovník. Důvodem, proč se Czechia nepoužívá v angličtině častěji je, že různí blázni (nejste to náhodou i Vy?) , kteří si odhlasovali, že Czechia se nepoužívá a systematicky mažou toto slovo třeba z wikipedie. Toto nyní činíte i Vy, takže bych Vás chtěl poprosit (což nedělám často) o vrácení správného překladu.
 * First off, your post is rude, and I no longer have intention to reply in Czech. Now to the subject matter. My evidence for the relative rarity of "Czechia" is here: . This stands in stark contrast to . Not that "*110" in the graph means that the frequency is multiplied by 110. --Dan Polansky (talk) 10:59, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Co znamená ten graf? Proč tam je *110? I bez grafu je mi jasné, že Czech Republic se nyní používá častěji než Czechia. To ale vůbec neznamená, že Tjeckien není Czechia.
 * The graph shows the change of term frequencies in time. shows the frequency change history in plain form, without multiplication. "*100" means "times one hundred" (krát sto, vynásobit stem), as I explained above. --Dan Polansky (talk) 11:16, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
 * A z toho vyplývá, že Tjeckien je Czech Republic? To snad ne? Nebo jako že někdo překládá Tjeckien - Czech Republic? Tak to budeme všude opakovat? Tady je ta statistika k ničemu. Proč se yopie, tolik bráníš Czechia?
 * The referent of Swedish "Tjeckien" is identical to the referent of English "Czech Republic": the meaning of the two terms are the same. Both terms are commonly used. Thefore, it is accurate and advisable to translate Swedish "Tjeckien" as "Czech Republic", as did the creator of Tjeckien: User:Mike, a native Swedish speaker. To offer "Czechia" as a translation of Swedish "Tjeckien" is to give a poor advise: it is to make the unsuspecting users of the dictionary produce non-native-sounding language use. --Dan Polansky (talk) 11:29, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Další omyl. Česko (Czechia) a Česká republika (Czech Republic) neznamená úplně to samé. Czech Republic vznikla v roce 1990/1993. Předtím bylo Česko Česká socialistická republika (Czech Socialist Republic). Lépe je to vidět u Francie, politickými názvy Francouzská republika, Franocuzské císařství, Francouzské království, ... ale furt je to: Francie. Jinač když už jsme u slovníku, co jsme jako Češi podělali úplně, je třeba název v arabštině (čik, ček), vietnamštině (Sec), indonésštině (Ceko), hindštině (cek), atd. Nebo v angličtině "in Czech - v Čechách", "Eppendof Czech & Slovakia - Eppendof Česká a Slovensko", "Made in Czech - Vyrobeno v České", "in the Czech and Slovak Republics - v České a Slovenské Republikách", atd. apod. To jsme posrali. A hádej, kdo na tom má také svůj nezanedbatelný podíl? Kdo maže Czechia z wiki? Já nemám čas se tady vybavovat, potřebuju taky něco dělat.
 * The referent of "Česko" is exactly identical to the referent of "Česká republika"; there is no semantic difference between the two terms. As for your "Kdo maže Czechia z wiki?" ("Who is deleting Czechia from wiki?"): Czechia is in Wiktionary, and is to stay, albeit as a rare term. Let me note that the English Wiktionary is a descriptivist dictionary that describes the actual language use. You bemoan that English speakers use "Czech" to mean "Česko", and wish they would use "Czechia"; I might share your wish, but as a descriptivist dictionary maker, I simply report on the actual use as I can detect it. It is not my business to make inaccurate or misleading reports about language use to promote a particular terminological preference. --Dan Polansky (talk) 11:41, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Čili wikislovník je plný nesmyslů a je stejně nepoužitelný jako wikipedie.

title: User talk:62.168.13.98


text:
Reichsrat

Etymology
From. Compare 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, and 🇨🇬.

Proper noun

 * 1)  the upper house of the parliaments of the Austrian Empire, the Kingdom of Bavaria, and Weimar Germany

Noun

 * 1)  a member of a Reichsrat; such a ‘senator’ or ‘lord’ in a similar position

title: Reichsrat


text:
pastorčad

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  stepchildren

title: pastorčad


text:
пасторчад

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  stepchildren

title: пасторчад


text:
pastorče

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) stepchild

title: pastorče


text:
пасторче

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) stepchild

title: пасторче


text:
pastorka

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) stepdaughter

title: pastorka


text:
пасторка

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) stepdaughter

title: пасторка


text:
nysse

Etymology
From a Tampere dialect contraction of +. According to a 1980s anecdote it was mistaken for a noun by a visitor to Tampere who heard natives say at the bus stop.

Noun

 * 1) bus, particularly one that is part of the public transport system of Tampere.
 * 2) * 2016 Vaikuttaako koko? August 18, 2016, Number 225(43866), page A1:
 * "fi"

- Tampereen nysseissä isommatkin hurtat ovat nykyään sallittuja, mutta toteutuuko käytäntö tositilanteessa?

title: nysse


text:
pomorník

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) skua

title: pomorník


text:
pašenog

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) co-brother-in-law one's wife's sister's husband

title: pašenog


text:
lappenpop

Etymology
Equivalent to.

title: lappenpop


text:
пашеног

Etymology
From (modern 🇨🇬).

Noun

 * 1) co-brother-in-law one's wife's sister's husband

title: пашеног


text:
voddenpop

Etymology
Equivalent to.

title: voddenpop


text:
pašanac

Etymology
From a language. Akin to 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) co-brother-in-law one's wife's sister's husband

title: pašanac


text:
пашанац

Etymology
From a language. Akin to 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) co-brother-in-law one's wife's sister's husband

title: пашанац


text: lentiscos

title: lentiscos


text:
kloddenpop

Etymology
Equivalent to.

title: kloddenpop


text:
klodde

Etymology
Cognate to 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) rag
 * 2)  a worthless object

title: klodde


text: puts up with

title: puts up with


text:
ruy-băng

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) ribbon

title: ruy-băng


text:
băng-đô

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) headband

title: băng-đô


text:
công-te-nơ

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) container, large metal box for transporting goods

title: công-te-nơ


text: BLTs

title: BLTs


text: rapporterte

title: rapporterte


text: rapportert

title: rapportert


text:
Category talk:European French

RFDO discussion: August 2013–July 2014
This category seems like nonsense if you consider that France alone spans four continents by itself. It's mostly used in baseball terms to contrast with Category:Quebec French and spectacularly manages to completely ignore the French colonies in Africa (Reunion, Mayotte etc.), America (Saint Pierre et Miquelon and a few Caribbean islands) and Oceania (French Polynesia etc.). -- Liliana • 23:08, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
 * French Wiktionary has this category too, and I'm sure they know quite a bit about their language. Are you contending that there are no French terms that are used primarily in Europe? 23:13, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Well it does suggest that French speakers living eg. in Reunion don't use these terms because Reunion isn't located in Europe, which I don't think is true. -- Liliana • 23:18, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Maybe the issue is the entries in the category then, and not the category itself. And we could always use it as a holder for different varieties of French in Europe, like we do with Dutch as well. 23:22, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm not really a fan of that kind of categorization because it clutters the regionalism category tree. -- Liliana • 23:34, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Kept. If you want to switch around what's in it, that's always a possibility; but there's certainly no agreement here to delete. —msh210℠ (talk) 16:05, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

title: Category talk:European French


text:
Template talk:list:territories of Asia/en

RFDO discussion: January–August 2014
Used only in one entry, Asia, which is, needless to say, not a territory of Asia. I discovered it because of Category:en:Territories of Asia, which is added by this template.

This has only one actual transclusion, so, since it uses the resource-devouring monster innocuously named, it should be substed if necessary (it seems a bit encyclopedic to me), then deleted. Chuck Entz (talk) 01:12, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Deleted —CodeCat 21:19, 7 August 2014 (UTC)


text:
Template talk:charcatboiler

Template:symbcatboiler
These were all merged into Template:poscatboiler two months ago, and I don't think many people have been using them since then. —CodeCat 11:31, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
 * ...or before then. --WikiTiki89 12:57, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
 * How so? —CodeCat 13:22, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Compared to mainspace entries, categories are created very infrequently. --WikiTiki89 13:56, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
 * I think "poscatboiler" is kind of a misnomer now, is it not? Delete, I guess. — Keφr 13:47, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

 * Redirect If they are used at all, or could be used at all, there is value in preserving them as redirects. Pur ple back pack 89  13:41, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

 * Delete per nom. - -sche (discuss) 20:16, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

title: Template talk:charcatboiler


text:
Template talk:zh-hanzi

RFDO discussion: July–August 2014
This contains nothing but. Not even a part of speech. The entries that transclude it are also missing POS sections, so they probably need to be cleaned up (see the BP discussion). 18:28, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect: If two templates do the same thing and both are used in articles, one should be redirected to the other and neither should be deleted. Pur ple back pack 89  03:15, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Moved to instead, as it seems it was used for Hanzi entries. —CodeCat 13:28, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

title: Template talk:zh-hanzi


text:
Template talk:ka-interj

RFDO discussion: August 2014
It is redundant. The same as.

BTW, is anyone interested in orphaning it? xD. Ive done it. --Dixtosa (talk) 14:32, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
 * This too --Dixtosa (talk) 21:46, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

title: Template talk:ka-interj


text:
Template talk:morphcatboiler

RFDO discussion: July–August 2014

 * See Template talk:charcatboiler.

title: Template talk:morphcatboiler


text:
Template talk:lexiconcatboiler

RFDO discussion: July–August 2014

 * See Template talk:charcatboiler.

title: Template talk:lexiconcatboiler


text:
Template talk:etymcatboiler

RFDO discussion: July–August 2014

 * See Template talk:charcatboiler.

title: Template talk:etymcatboiler


text:
Template talk:compcatboiler

RFDO discussion: July–August 2014

 * See Template talk:charcatboiler.

title: Template talk:compcatboiler


text:
Template talk:phrasecatboiler

RFDO discussion: July–August 2014

 * See Template talk:charcatboiler.

title: Template talk:phrasecatboiler


text:
Template talk:shortcatboiler

RFDO discussion: July–August 2014

 * See Template talk:charcatboiler.

title: Template talk:shortcatboiler


text:
Template talk:rhymecatboiler

RFDO discussion: July–August 2014

 * See Template talk:charcatboiler.

title: Template talk:rhymecatboiler


text:
Template talk:symbcatboiler

RFDO discussion: July–August 2014

 * See Template talk:charcatboiler.

title: Template talk:symbcatboiler


text:
Template talk:ka-intj

RFDO discussion: August 2014

 * See Template talk:ka-interj.

title: Template talk:ka-intj


text:
Thread:User talk:Kephir/Template:ttbc breaking/reply (2)

Ok, I fixed that error too. Thank you.


text:
ᑎᖕᒥᓲᖅ

Noun

 * 1) aeroplane, airplane, plane

title: ᑎᖕᒥᓲᖅ


text:
Thread:User talk:CodeCat/Why did you remove the Sexagenary cycle category I created?

Can you tell me why?


text:
Thread:User talk:CodeCat/Why did you remove the Sexagenary cycle category I created?/reply

The category structure is stored in a number of modules, Module:category tree/topic cat and its subpages. This is done so that all languages can easily share the same tree structure and there is no redundant information. If you add categories manually then it bypasses that whole system.

Also I wonder why you created the categories if they show errors like that.


text:
ツ゚ンプ

Noun

 * 1) room (of a building)

title: ツ゚ンプ


text: non-migratory

title: non-migratory


text:
rūma

Etymology
Borrowed from.

Noun

 * 1) room (of a building)

title: rūma


text:
အခန်း

Noun

 * 1) room of a building

title: အခန်း


text:
කාමරය

Etymology
, from, from , from , from

Noun

 * 1) room (of a building)

title: කාමරය


text:
утоқ

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) room of a building

title: утоқ


text:
otag

Etymology
Cognate with 🇨🇬; 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) room (of a building)

title: otag


text:
бөлме

Noun

 * 1) room (of a building)

title: бөлме


text:
បន្ទប់

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) room (of a building)

title: បន្ទប់


text:
бөлмө

Noun

 * 1) room (of a building)

title: бөлмө


text:
stasjonær

Adjective

 * 1) stationary (not mobile, movable, or portable)
 * 2) non-migratory (birds, fish and animals that do not migrate)

Adjective

 * 1) stationary (as above)
 * 2) non-migratory (as above)

title: stasjonær


text:
Phù Tang

Etymology
(an alternate name of the ), derived from the name of a legendary tree that was said to have grown somewhere in the East China Sea, where the sun rose. The name was also used to refer to the sun, and a legendary country that was located in the East.

Proper noun

 * , legendary land to the East commonly assumed to be Japan

title: Phù Tang


text: Template:mkh-mvi-pron

title: Template:mkh-mvi-pron


text:
Þórshǫfn

Etymology
From.

Proper noun

 * 1) Tórshavn, capital of the Faroe Islands

title: Þórshǫfn


text: Category:Old Norse terms derived from Brythonic languages


text: stasjonært

title: stasjonært


text: stasjonære

title: stasjonære


text: Template:list:Cyrillic script letters/xal


text: Category:Kalmyk list templates

title: Category:Kalmyk list templates


text:
tidal lock

Noun

 * 1) A sealock.
 * 1) A sealock.
 * 1) A sealock.

title: tidal lock


text: Template:list:Cyrillic script letters/mn


text: Category:Mongolian list templates

title: Category:Mongolian list templates


text:
Thread:User talk:CodeCat/Why did you remove the Sexagenary cycle category I created?/reply (2)

I'm no real Wiki guy, so I ain't real good at Wiki stuff. I've done a few discussions and seen a lot, but most of them came to a dead end, unless someone just stood up and did something. So I just created the categories, and hoped that anyone who sees the errors would help me fix them.


text: ontwikkelingetje

title: ontwikkelingetje


text: ontwikkelingetjes

title: ontwikkelingetjes


text: ontwikkelinkje

title: ontwikkelinkje


text: ontwikkelinkjes

title: ontwikkelinkjes


text: open haarden

title: open haarden


text: open haardje

title: open haardje


text: Template:list:Cyrillic script letters/mhr


text: open haardjes

title: open haardjes


text: Category:Eastern Mari list templates

title: Category:Eastern Mari list templates


text: onveiligheden

title: onveiligheden


text: Template:list:Cyrillic script letters/mrj


text: onverdraagzaamheden

title: onverdraagzaamheden


text: onverdraagzaamheidje

title: onverdraagzaamheidje


text: Category:Western Mari list templates

title: Category:Western Mari list templates


text: onverdraagzaamheidjes

title: onverdraagzaamheidjes


text: Category:Western Mari templates

title: Category:Western Mari templates


text: toleranties

title: toleranties


text: tolerantietje

title: tolerantietje


text: tolerantietjes

title: tolerantietjes


text:
я̆

Letter

 * 1) a letter in some Cyrillic alphabets

title: я̆


text: ю̆

title: ю̆


text:
є̈

Letter

 * 1) a letter in some Cyrillic alphabets

title: є̈


text: Template:list:Cyrillic script letters/yai


text: Category:Yagnobi list templates

title: Category:Yagnobi list templates


text:
ԝ

Letter

 * 1) The fourth letter of the Yaghnobi alphabet

title: ԝ


text: Category:Yagnobi letters

title: Category:Yagnobi letters


text: Category:Yagnobi symbols

title: Category:Yagnobi symbols


text: Romanorum

title: Romanorum


text:
Ԝ

Letter

 * 1) The fourth letter of the Yaghnobi alphabet

title: Ԝ


text:
paunica

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) peahen

title: paunica


text:
пауница

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) peahen

title: пауница


text:
paukov

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1)  spider; spider's

title: paukov


text:
пауков

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1)  spider; spider's

title: пауков


text:
paučji

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1)  spider; spider's

title: paučji


text:
паучји

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1)  spider; spider's

title: паучји


text:
paučić

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  spider

title: paučić


text:
паучић

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  spider

title: паучић


text:
pazarište

Etymology
From.

title: pazarište


text:
пазариште

Noun

 * 1) large outdoor market

Etymology
From.

title: пазариште


text:
pazariti

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to buy
 * 2)  to do business, trade, buy and sell

title: pazariti


text:
пазарити

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to buy
 * 2)  to do business, trade, buy and sell

title: пазарити


text:
pazarni

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1)  market
 * 2)  bazaar

title: pazarni


text:
пазарни

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1)  market
 * 2)  bazaar

title: пазарни


text:
Thread:User talk:CodeCat/Why did you remove the Sexagenary cycle category I created?/reply (3)

I can help but I would need to know some things first. What parent category should Category:vi:Sexagenary cycle appear in? Also, why is the second word in "Heavenly Stems" and "Earthly Branches" capitalised?


text:
пажљив

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) attentive, cautious, careful

title: пажљив


text:
pažljivost

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) attention, carefulness, heedfulness, thoughtfullness

title: pažljivost


text:
пажљивост

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) attention, carefulness, heedfulness, thoughtfullness

title: пажљивост


text:
beyako

Adjective

 * 1)  slang spelling of bellaco

title: beyako


text: thoughtfullness

title: thoughtfullness


text:
Thread:User talk:CodeCat/Why did you remove the Sexagenary cycle category I created?/reply (4)

I just typed the terms in the way the Wikipedia suggests. You can check out these articles Sexagenary cycle, Celestial stem, Earthly Branches. The Sexagenary cycle category should be a child category of something related to the Chinese zodiac, or something related to the way Asian people mark years or times of a day.


text: Turquoise

title: Turquoise


text:
Turquois

Etymology
.

Adjective

 * 1) Turkish

title: Turquois


text:
Talk:汐実子

RFV discussion: December 2013–September 2014
On 15 June 2008 a certain user added a huge number of given names by (one might guess) searching the given names dictionary in WWWJDIC with the keyword "実", unless this user happens to know a huge number of names which all just happen to contain the same character and half of which are impossible to verify. This is one of those which gets under 1000 hits, all of which are online dictionaries, "name recipe" websites, or otherwise dubious sources. I've checked all the "Yumiko"s and these appear bogus:

 * 汐実子 (heading)
 * 生実子
 * 弓実子
 * 諭実子
 * ゆ実子 - A mix of kana and kanji is common in female given names, but in such a case, only the final 子 is written in kanji. This type of combination is very unusual.
 * 宙実子
 * 幸実子

Haplogy (話) 01:30, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete all. It is all right if we have ゆみこ. — T AKASUGI Shinji (talk) 06:06, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. None of the names listed seems to come with enough instances we can verify. Assuming three citations are needed for including given names, I agree with deleting the listed entries - non-existing or extremely rare names as far as I can see. I found zero or only one reliable instance for each on the web: 生実子 (Kimiko, not Yumiko), 弓美子 (Yumiko), 諭実子 (probably Yumiko), 幸実子 (probably Yumiko). Whym (talk) 12:18, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Failed. bd2412 T 14:07, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:汐実子


text:
Talk:Ε

RFV discussion: May–July 2014
Sense: "A small positive quantity." As fas as I know, a lowercase epsilon is usually used for this sense. — Keφr 20:37, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Failed. — Ungoliant (falai) 00:44, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:Ε


text:
Talk:topo

RFV discussion: June–July 2014
Please verify topo. I can't find the English sense of "a game" on Google or Google books. It does seem to be short for "topographical" though. Siuenti (talk) 09:14, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I have added the definition "A topographic map.". DCDuring TALK 20:10, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I have found the game Topo, apparently invented by mathematical author, no article on WP, but the search engine there finds three references to him.
 * I placed one use from Usenet (via Google Groups). I have found a use by Pappas in The Joy of Mathematics. DCDuring TALK 20:31, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
 * There is a product called Topo! which makes Topo quite hard to find with simple search strategies. DCDuring TALK 20:36, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Other than the ones in the entry, I found these two:, . All of them, except Pappas’ book, are mentions. — Ungoliant (falai) 20:15, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Failed. — Ungoliant (falai) 20:27, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:topo


text:
Talk:iridium birthday

RFV discussion: July–August 2014
— Ungoliant (falai) 01:50, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

 * Highly dubious. Searching for " "iridium birthday" -SUNGLASSES -JOHNNY ROGERS " brings up exactly nothing in Google web, books, or images. Only addition by this anon editor. Suspect hoax.--Dmol (talk) 04:08, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

 * Probably not a hoax, but most likely a protologism. I think the idea is: if there's a silver anniversary for 25 years and golden anniversary for fifty years, then you just have to come up with a substance that isn't in the lists for a number that isn't in the lists, and, secondarily, the same concept that applies to anniversaries must apply to birthdays as well. People add lame inventions like this all the time- look through WT:LOP and you'll find lots of them. Chuck Entz (talk) 04:42, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
 * A protologism is a hoax for our purposes. Unless I suppose the creator freely admits they've coined the word. Renard Migrant (talk) 10:00, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Deleted. I believe it’s a hoax. — T AKASUGI Shinji (talk) 16:36, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:iridium birthday


text:
Talk:アムピトリーテー

RFV discussion: May–July 2014
Created by our well-known and prolific creator of garbage Japanese entries, but just plausible enough not to delete on sight.

Although the Japanese Wikipedia uses this name in its article on Amphitrite, I can find only one hit in Google Books and none in Google Groups. Chuck Entz (talk) 04:39, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
 * I should also mention that Japanese Wikipedia spells the asteroid differently, so the second sense is almost definitely wrong. Chuck Entz (talk) 04:41, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
 * I think we could convert アムピトリーテー into an "alternative form" entry linked to アンフィトリテ which is definitely a more commonly used form and is attestable. Japanese Wikipedia uses a transliteration scheme of Ancient Greek that is supposedly more faithful, but it does not necessarily reflect actual uses in Japanese we can observe. Whym (talk) 14:50, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The form アムピトリーテー itself does seem to be accepted by some researchers, at least as an alternative form, if not in wider use: (p. 10),  (p. 4) Whym (talk) 15:10, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Converted to alternative form of アンフィトリテ per Whym’s suggestion. Can someone add the citations in his link? — Ungoliant (falai) 00:49, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:アムピトリーテー


text:
Talk:millesimate

RFV discussion: July–August 2014
The one citation in the entry is the only one I can find. Note also the difference between the definition of this word ("claim one-thousandth of") and the definitions of all the words linked-to from the see also section ("reduce by X"). - -sche (discuss) 06:18, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Failed. — Ungoliant (falai) 01:55, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:millesimate


text:
Talk:teória sprisahania

RFV discussion: July–August 2014
Looks unattested (WT:ATTEST). --Dan Polansky (talk) 14:11, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Look it up on Google, there are multiple hits on Slovak sites. Peter238 (talk) 12:25, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Read the link WT:ATTEST. Renard Migrant (talk) 13:05, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Right. In that case, I don't have better sources than this. I took it from the Slovak Wikipedia. Peter238 (talk) 16:04, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Failed. — Ungoliant (falai) 01:40, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:teória sprisahania


text:
Talk:misqueme

RFV discussion: July–August 2014
Almost all of the results of are quotations of ; one result is a different Middle English work quoted in The Index of Middle English Prose, Handlist VIII. Only one result is a book that is modern — and it's so modern that it was apparently e-published (and is therefore questionably durable), viz. The Mating Rituals of the Burning Giraffe: "'Aren't there any TV shows?' she suggested, but took that back herself after a moment's consideration, and before he could misqueme her again." - -sche (discuss) 15:48, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Failed. Converted to Middle English. — Ungoliant (falai) 01:40, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:misqueme


text:
Talk:umbeset

RFV discussion: July–August 2014
Seems to be Scots, but I do see a couple of citations of "umbesetting" from Dickens and Blackwood's [usually English-language] Edinburgh Magazine, so perhaps some of the senses are used in English. - -sche (discuss) 05:50, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

 * The OED has entries for both the verb and the noun (umbesetting), but marks both as obsolete in English (latest cite from 1624). I would be surprised to see current usages outside Scots (where obsolete English is preserved as a novelty).   D b f  i  r  s   06:55, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Verb senses cited. The first sense’s second and third citations are a bit iffy, so IDK if those should count. — Ungoliant (falai) 16:16, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Impressive! And indicative of an oddness Liliana and I discussed on RFD not long ago: Google Books apparently shows you different citations than it shows me (and shows me different citations than it showed Liliana on RFD). As I speculated then, perhaps it's finally doing what it promised, showing users "customized" results which are as (poorly) predictive of what I want to see as its autocomplete suggestions are. I'm not sure what sense "There is an umbeset moat" is using; if I sub in "surround", it doesn't make sense to me: "there is a surrounded moat". (Doesn't a moat do the surrounding, rather than being surrounded?) - -sche (discuss) 17:56, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
 * I hazarded the guess that the author could be referring to something else surrounding the moat (the strip of cement? The wording suggests the strip of cement is the moat, but I’ve never seen a strip of anything being called a moat). It could be merely mistaken usage of the word, though. — Ungoliant (falai) 18:04, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
 * I would venture, 'There is a moat which is umbeset', meaning "there is a moat that is set-around", a moat that surrounds. Leasnam (talk) 18:17, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The first verb sense and the only noun sense failed. Citations moved to Citations:umbeset. — Ungoliant (falai) 01:55, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:umbeset


text:
Talk:byk

RFV discussion: July–August 2014
English: electric bike

— Ungoliant (falai) 02:56, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Failed. — Ungoliant (falai) 01:40, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:byk


text:
Talk:présente

RFV discussion: July–August 2014
Rfv-sense: "the/a present one of some sort", which I think refers to 'gift' not 'present tense'. Even so, both 'gift' and 'present' tense are. The Trésor de langue française informatisée list this (and the present tense meaning) as but doesn't list them as présente. Renard Migrant (talk) 13:32, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Failed. — Ungoliant (falai) 01:55, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:présente


text:
Talk:caffе

RFV discussion: July–August 2014
I can't find this speeling to mean café in attestation sources. . (Was in café as an alternative spelling.) --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:25, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Cited. — Ungoliant (falai) 03:53, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

 * RFV passed. --Dan Polansky (talk) 15:01, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:caffе


text:
Talk:prophecy

RFV discussion: July 2014
Consensus supports Verb prophesy and Noun prophecy. Example: Disciples came to hear Jesus prophesy and wrote down His prophecy. Proposed inclusion of Verb prophecy breaks that pattern. I have seen some examples of this but not in a present dictionary or normative text. Unless anyone supplies citations showing it to be either 1) (by default) a current English usage, or 2) an archaic usage that was proscriptively correct in an era identified by more than "dated", it will not meet WT:CFI. This link searches many dictionaries but finds nouns. 84.209.89.214 15:33, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Cited. I’m not convinced it’s even dated. Perhaps now rare, now uncommon or now nonstandard are more accurate labels. — Ungoliant (falai) 16:51, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Kept, detagging rfv. Should it be defined as a misspelling, though, rather than a dated form? I suspect so. —msh210℠ (talk) 19:23, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Please do not remove rfv tag until these questions are resolved. I don't think it is Wiktionary's mission to define a list of misspellings. Retagging rfv. 84.209.89.214 18:51, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
 * We do include misspellings. --WikiTiki89 18:57, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Creating a dictionary of misspellings strikes me as perverse. You wind up with a useless dictionary. 84.209.89.214 21:29, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
 * You end up with a dictionary that will tell you what the word you're looking at means and what it's current common spelling is.--Prosfilaes (talk) 22:07, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:prophecy


text:
Talk:Alba

RFV discussion: July–August 2014
Asturian sense of "Scotland". I'm skeptical that an Iberian Romance language would use the Gaelic name for Scotland; note that is also (much more plausibly) said to be the Asturian word for "Scotland". —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 17:34, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
 * I managed to find an Asturian use of as an abbreviation of, but none meaning Scotland. , on the other hand, is easily citable. — Ungoliant (falai) 23:52, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Failed. — Ungoliant (falai) 01:40, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:Alba


text:
Talk:caffé

RFV discussion: July–August 2014
I nominate the English section, not the Italian. I can't find this spelling used in English to mean café in English attestation sources. . (Was in café as an alternative spelling.) --Dan Polansky (talk) 14:28, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Cited. — Ungoliant (falai) 03:53, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

 * RFV passed. --Dan Polansky (talk) 15:00, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:caffé


text:
Talk:giginal

RFV discussion: August 2014
The Google Books hits are scannos of original. — Ungoliant (falai) 22:05, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

 * Speedied: clear inventions (look at the nonsense etymologies that were originally there). Equinox ◑ 22:21, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

pebinal
By the same user. — Ungoliant (falai) 22:10, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

 * Speedied: clear inventions (look at the nonsense etymologies that were originally there). Equinox ◑ 22:21, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:giginal


text:
Talk:antiMuslimism

RFV discussion: August–September 2014
I don't think this spelling and capitalization is attested. We have anti-Muslimism, which seems okay. I am okay with speedy delete of this as obviously unattested. Attesting quotations can be placed at Citations:antiMuslimism either way. --Dan Polansky (talk) 21:31, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
 * PaM added three citations to the entry, but one of them is a mention. — Ungoliant (falai) 16:56, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * And all three actually use a hyphen:, , . —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 17:03, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * It looks like the hyphens in use there are a result of indentions and a combination of a page layout that leaves space for thin clumns and a relatively long word. In the instances cited, it looks more like a text editing feature which rejects left text alignment and instead goes for left-right text margin alignment resukting in forced hyphenation for sentence break purposes. Pass a Method (talk) 10:36, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The first source is not using the hyphen on a line break, and the article also uses the word "anti-Muslim" with a hyphenated spelling.
 * The second source uses the word once at a line break, and then again, a few words later, not at a line break. They use the hyphen both times.
 * The third source uses the spelling "anti-Muslimism" when the word does not occur at a line break.
 * So it's clear to me that all three sources intended the spelling "anti-Muslimism". —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 14:15, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
 * First of all i apologize for fucking up the citations, i wasn't really paying attention. Secondly, antiMuslimism has at least a few more attestations, although i'm reluctant to post them as a reference as i think its best for you to see them first hand. As far as i know the optical character recognition used on Google books does sometimes mistake punctuation marks on its current artificial software, nevertheless, the automatic identification and data capture is unlikely to have erreneously scanned the unicodes on these books on each occasion. Therefore, i would like to initiate a more even-handed approach to finding sources by collaborating with you or others. Pass a Method (talk) 15:57, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I looked through the first 20 results and they are all either scanos for the hyphenated version anti-Muslimism or (rarely) the lower-case version antimuslimism. --WikiTiki89 16:16, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

 * Deleted (somewhat speedily / ahead of schedule). - -sche (discuss) 05:45, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:antiMuslimism


text:
Talk:ninesome

RFV discussion: August 2014
Tagged but not listed. — Ungoliant (falai) 11:21, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Three citations added, with more available on Google Books. —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 12:28, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

 * RFV passed. --Dan Polansky (talk) 14:23, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:ninesome


text:
Talk:tobaccosmoke

RFV discussion: August 2014
rfv --kc_kennylau (talk) 05:47, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Pinging original author User:Type56op9. --kc_kennylau (talk) 06:35, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

 * I'm going to "be bold" and speedy this one. Lazy Wonderfool not checking for scannos, for sure. Equinox ◑ 19:33, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:tobaccosmoke


text:
Talk:plumcake

RFV discussion: August 2014
rfv --kc_kennylau (talk) 06:29, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Can find plum cake but not plumcake, pinging original author User:Type56op9. --kc_kennylau (talk) 06:35, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

 * Cited. Equinox ◑ 16:14, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

 * RFV passed. --Dan Polansky (talk) 14:21, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:plumcake


text:
Talk:ranche

RFV discussion: August 2014
Why would the initial "b" be ever omitted? --kc_kennylau (talk) 09:59, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

 * A typo? I believe it's an old form of ranch; see Google Books. Equinox ◑ 16:18, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes I'm sure it's a typo. Renard Migrant (talk) 16:50, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Totally a typo. Sorry guys. BTW, so you know, I won't be citing the entries above. --Type56op9 (talk) 23:54, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

 * Okay, it's not cited, but I'm striking this because the original reason for RFV is gone, and you can easily find "ranche" as old form of "ranch" in Google Books. Equinox ◑ 01:04, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:ranche


text:
Talk:throneroom

RFV discussion: August 2014
rfv --kc_kennylau (talk) 06:32, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Can find throne room and throne-room but not throneroom, pinging original author User:Type56op9. --kc_kennylau (talk) 06:35, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

 * Cited. Equinox ◑ 16:17, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

 * RFV passed. --Dan Polansky (talk) 14:22, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:throneroom


text:
Talk:hairlore

RFV discussion: August 2014
The science or study of hair. Ƿidsiþ 06:56, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

 * I've found five citations, two as a compound, two hyphenated, and one spaced as "hair lore". Four relate to the sociology of hair, the other (I think) to the science and craft of dealing with hair. --Catsidhe (verba, facta) 07:26, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
 * (edit conflict) I speedied it before I noticed the rfv, but restored it. This IP is trying to come up with etymologically English substitutes for -ology terms using lore, apparently with this 1910 article as a source. Although there's usage for some of these, they have different meanings. For instance, hairlore is folklore about hair, not the scientific study of it. Chuck Entz (talk) 07:27, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes…annoying. Well, this one passes, I merged the senses and marked it as rare…but striking. Ƿidsiþ 08:59, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:hairlore


text:
Talk:Fiver

RFV discussion: September 2014
The "Zaydi Shi'a Muslim" sense. -Cloudcuckoolander (talk) 23:48, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Cited. — Ungoliant (falai) 02:40, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Looks good. -Cloudcuckoolander (talk) 18:47, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Arabic term
Hi, could sb. please add the original Arabic term for 'fiver'? Thanks in advance. --Backinstadiums (talk) 09:39, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:Fiver


text:
Talk:anunnakianism

RFV discussion: September 2014
Looks like tosh to me. Needs to be properly formatted and severely cleaned up if OK. SemperBlotto (talk) 18:51, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
 * BGC has nothing, but Wikipedia has an article on, who believed the things this entry calls "anunnakianism", but there's no indication in the WP article that there was a religion or an ism founded on his beliefs. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 19:01, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

It is the beliefs of a newly formed Church movement that has as it's base science of the cosmos and empirical data concerning life on other planets and how we are affected by such.

 * Speedily deleted as obvious neologism. However, Anunnakian may be attestable in the works of Sitchin. Equinox ◑ 20:12, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:anunnakianism


text:
Talk:pebinal

RFV discussion: August 2014

 * See Talk:giginal.

title: Talk:pebinal


text:
User talk:Renard Migrant/new adj form

* : the word to be inflected (e.g. bleu is the lemma form of bleus). No default.
 * : the inflection,  for masculine plural,   for feminine,   for feminine plural. No default.
 * : the language. No default.

title: User talk:Renard Migrant/new adj form


text:
Cà Mau

Etymology
Borrowed from.

Translations

 * Chinese:
 * Mandarin:
 * Vietnamese:

Etymology
From.

title: Cà Mau


text:
pčelarica

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) beekeeper female

title: pčelarica


text:
пчеларица

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) beekeeper female

title: пчеларица


text:
pčelinji

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1)  bee; apian

title: pčelinji


text:
пчелињи

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1)  bee; apian

title: пчелињи


text:
megtanul

Verb

 * 1)  to learn, to master

title: megtanul


text:
kì thủ

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1)  a

Usage notes
Only used in an competitive sense, whereby the game is recognized as a sport, such as xiangqi, shogi, go, chess, etc. For casual board games like or, use  instead.

title: kì thủ


text: valrossen

title: valrossen