text:
User talk:Purplebackpack89/Archive 3

Hi
I don't agree with you on most things, and think your methods are rather frustrating, but I do completely sympathise with you on being the target of so many people's scorn. And I admire you for standing up for what you believe is right, despite the constant abuse, opposition and personal attacks (including from me). That is one thing I think we have in common. I hope this encourages you at least, to not let bullying get to you. Just put it aside and work on Wiktionary, make it better, and to hell with "community". —CodeCat 18:21, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Pur ple back pack 89  18:56, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above is just cheap. CodeCat did nothing to help you when you were in trouble, AFAIK, unlike other members of the community that CodeCat expressly scorns above (Beer_parlour/2014/June). Your trouble was caused by CodeCat repeatedly unjustly edit warring with you and by CodeCat's great admirer Kephir (as per the previous link) who open declares his anti-consensus stances. --Dan Polansky (talk) 12:59, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Kephir vote page
Please consider adding to your Kephir vote page; this is astounding! --Dan Polansky (talk) 12:43, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't think User:Kephir fully comprehends what he's done in a stroke. I could now create an unsourced neologism, and there'd be nothing that could be done with it.  Or I could close every single RfD and RfV as keep, because there's no policy to delete them right now.
 * I don't think there's much of a consensus for anything from that vote, and, much as I don't like CFI as written, there certainly wasn't consensus to completely throw it out. Had that argument been put to a vote instead of what User:Renard Migrant posited, there would have been at most 9 supports and 7 opposes, which isn't quite enough to do anything.  What I interpret the vote as saying is that people are unhappy with CFI as written and they believe things other than CFI should be considered in RfD discussions.  The upshot of that isn't obsoleting CFI, it's demoting it to a guideline, something that can be used in an argument but is not a be-all-and-end-all, and can be disregarded in particular instances by community consensus.
 * Looks like it's time for me to comment at BP or TR or one of those about this. Pur ple back pack 89  15:29, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 * I posted Beer_parlour/2015/February. I expect an admin to revert his diff soon; if not, then the moon people have taken over the refuge place this time around.
 * I and multiple other editors recognize the principle of consensus; Kephir does not which disqualifies him from being an admin and from editing WT:CFI either. --Dan Polansky (talk) 15:39, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Kephir desysopping and preliminary support
I edited User:Purplebackpack89/Wiktionary:Votes/2015-01/De-sysoping Kephir to add a preliminary support section, to gauge the scope of support that there may be. Please revert if you disagree; it is your page. --Dan Polansky (talk) 15:41, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 * That's fine, although you may have to re-sign it when it happens. It's almost there; not sure if we're counting the CFI diff as the straw that broke the camel's back. Pur ple back pack 89   16:18, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 * I want to have a prelimiary gauge before the actual official vote starts. I have never supported Kephir adminship in the first place, but other potentially supporting editors may need even more evidence of bad behavior than so far presented. --Dan Polansky (talk) 16:36, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 * That's fine. Not entirely sure how those editors will find it; perhaps a preliminary oppose section as well?  I'm pretty sure we have at least one oppose on this in addition to the dude himself. Pur ple back pack 89   16:56, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Those monitoring recent changes may notice the page; if they don't, they don't. We don't need an oppose section: there are many opposes available, and that is not in question. What is in question is whether, because of all the abuse and objectionable editing, there are actually some supports. Since I believe many admins don't give a damn. --Dan Polansky (talk) 17:05, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

 * The de-sysop request should now be considered on hold because Kephir has not been a regular contributor for some weeks, but should he resume editing in the controversial manner he did in 2014, the request will be re-activated. Until then, it should remain in userspace, and editors are allowed to add additional diffs. Pur ple back pack 89   15:23, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Refactoring other people's posts
Replacing deprecated syntax is one of the few valid reasons for refactoring other people's posts.

PS: You did nothing wrong here. Kephir was wrong to delete the talk page thread and block you rather than simply saying what I just said.

--WikiTiki89 14:14, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

 * Ah, I see. FWIW, you might have noticed Kephir took things a few bridges too far...after I pointed out it was inappropriate to delete a good-faith thread as vandalism, he deleted that comment and tried to block me for six months.  Dude seems to have a vendetta against me. Pur ple back pack 89   14:17, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't call it a vendetta. A vendetta implies that he seeks confrontation with you, which he does not. He is just annoyed at you and can no longer deal with your interactions with him. --WikiTiki89 14:31, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 * But, Wikitiki, his remedy is ham-handed blocks it's clear the community doesn't support. If he wants me gone, he should at least have the common sense to try something other than ham-handed blocks.  He also shouldn't consider everything I say to be vandalism, which he's been doing for the past nine months.  As for seeking confrontation, the diffs I've provided in the nom include diffs of him removing content I posted to third-party talk pages and community noticeboards.  What's the explanation for doing that? Pur ple back pack 89   14:48, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Kephir-Purplebackpack89 interaction ban
FYI, I have enacted an interaction ban in as per community consensus. --Dan Polansky (talk) 05:46, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
 * If I may ask you, please don't respond to Kephir or his supporters in Beer parlour today any more. I know, the interaction ban only starts tomorrow. The recent Kephir post to Beer parlour attacks your basic freedoms by proposing to rob you of all editing rights whatsoever, including right of posting to your talk page. By doing so, the Kephir post is all too likely to incite a response from you that you are going to be sorry for. Therefore, my best advice is to act as if the interaction ban already started. --Dan Polansky (talk) 06:17, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Glad to see it's been enacted. Hope you come to bat for me if somebody runs with the torch of indeffing me. Pur ple back pack 89   12:57, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Discussion archives
Should go on the talk page, not the main entry. DTLHS (talk) 16:41, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Your seemingly unattestable recent creations
I have added a couple of these to RFV. Please help cite them, and if you are unable, you should take this as a very clear sign not to create such entries. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 05:18, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Chillax, dude. One of the complaints in the RfD was that the entries were malformed.  I created the logical full set of entries; I don't see why I'm the boogie man in this scenario.  Also, you should also talk to User: IQ125, as he's the guy who created the original entry. Pur ple back pack 89   12:58, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Also, User:Metaknowledge, it's worth noting that there is a Wikipedia article on this topic. Not sure how we find durable URLs for HuffPost and CNN's articles on this term. Pur ple back pack 89   13:12, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Actually, I don't intend to "chillax" when you think it's okay to create entries without checking whether they're attestable, regardless of who else created related entries. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 00:27, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I think you're overreacting. There was a problem with the way the initial entries were created.  I fixed it.  The fix required creating additional entries. Pur ple back pack 89   00:30, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Also, if you want people to check attestability before creating ALL articles, you've got a lot of RfVing to do (of 80-90% of the entries here). You also probably should go to BP and start a vote about forcing all entries to have the 3 citations immediately when they're created, which is the only way to back up your demand with policy. Pur ple back pack 89   00:33, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
 * You don't get it. Most entries are easily attestable, even trivially so. In a case where there are zero hits on Google Books, it's a wholly different matter. I don't feel like arguing any more, so here you go: if either of the two entries you created fails RFV, and I find that you have continued to create unattestable entries after this warning, I will consider that to be disruptive behaviour and there will be consequences. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 04:01, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
 * There is no requirement that one has to look on Google Books before creating an entry, and you should not be foisting one upon me. I stand 100% by the creation of those entries..  Also, I consider it hideously disengenuous that you are complaining about the entries I created, but you are not threatening User:IQ125 with similar actions.  It's also premature to be discussing all this as we haven't even determined whether they pass or fail.  You shouldn't be threatening me at all, Meta, but at a minimum, you need to wait until the RfV has failed before claiming the creations are disruptive. Pur ple back pack 89   04:24, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

I hope you realize I did find a citation for flag jacker Pur ple back pack 89  21:40, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * It's funny that you'd want to defend these, considering that they're set to fail RFV (a month has passed without requisite citations being found, even after some of our best and brightest have gone looking for them). I would close it myself, but to avoid the perception of bias I'm waiting for somebody else to close them. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 21:44, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * You've claimed that they were completely uncitable; which doesn't seem to be true. You've also claimed that I knew they were uncitable, which I didn't...I wasn't sure whether or not they could be cited. Pur ple back pack 89   21:51, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Unblock

 * Gross hypocrisy. Whenever you make a bad, messy edit, or insult someone, you're full of excuses to plead your angelic innocence. And yet your entire modus operandi on this project is based on accusations toward others of "bullying" and trying to drive you off the project. One rule for them, one rule for you. Everyone's basically just sick of it. Equinox ◑ 21:26, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * It is it necessary for people like Ungoliant to say something along the lines of "Purplebackpack sucks as an editor" in an edit summary? Wouldn't it be better if he just said "This entry would be better if we did X, Y or Z"?  And Ungoliant has made no secret that he wants me driven off the project.  Pur ple back pack 89   21:32, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * What I said was hardly along those lines, and using quotation marks around it is an outright attempt to mislead administrators. You are not going to get out of this hole by using misleading statements. — Ungoliant (falai) 21:43, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * You're just delving into semantics at this point, Ungoliant. You have made a number of edit summaries that disparage my editing.  While they do not say, "Purplebackpack sucks", that's the message they are trying to convey.  They are clearly problematic, they are not improving the community, and they should be stopped. Pur ple back pack 89   21:46, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

 * Your equivocations are just outrageous. His edit summary was milder than your "dumbass", but I suppose you've got some typical Purple excuse for that? Stress from the workplace? Too much "bullying" from people cleaning up your bad edits? Equinox ◑ 21:46, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Is he blocked? No!  Then why should I be?  Do you think he's completely without fault?  Don't you think he could've been kinder in his summary?  Calling another "dumbass" probably was inappropriate, but people haven't tended to be blocked on this project for mean edit summaries, so why start now? Pur ple back pack 89   21:53, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * This whole mess has been really painful to watch. I have to agree that the edit comment that started this should never have been made, and that most of the accusations against you have been off target: it's hard to accuse someone of bad faith who sincerely believes he's right, and who sincerely believes that he's just standing up for his rights- even if he's almost completely wrong. On the other hand, you aren't an innocent lamb being led to the slaughter, either.
 * The problem is that the matter of good faith is a distraction from the real issue: a wiki is a community, and that requires getting along with, and working with, other people. It's not enough to stay within the letter of the rules if you end up making everybody hate you. If you have to cite a bunch of rules to force people to let you have your way, you've already lost the war, even if you win the battle. If you have to DEMAND to be respected IN ALL CAPS!!!, you've already lost any respect you might have had to start with.
 * Yes, you've been the target of irrational and unfair attacks, but the real question is, how did it get to this point? Why are otherwise sane, rational people lining up to spit on you? Here's how:
 * You've made a career of assuming that those who disagree with you aren't just wrong, they're out to get you- and everything they do is in bad faith.
 * You've consistently steered toward confrontation over persuasion
 * You've made it abundantly clear that you don't care what anyone else thinks, as long as you get your way.
 * You've gone out of your way, at times, to rub it in when you win an argument.
 * You've acted as if your contributions and your feelings are all that matter, and as if the entire project revolves around you. The fact is, you're not unique: everybody here is a volunteer. Every one of us is donating our time, effort and expertise to improve the dictionary. Some of the people you're picking fights with contribute more to the dictionary, on a good week (maybe even on a good day), than you have. Ever.
 * In sum: good faith isn't enough to make it around here. Aside from competence, it takes an open mind, willingness to compromise, tact, and at least a little empathy. You've shown very little of any of those. You can't keep breaking down the community like this- it's the only thing holding you up. Chuck Entz (talk) 02:47, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
 * , you've got mail. Pur ple back pack 89  06:19, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Warnings
You have blocked by Daniel Carrero for 3 days; he has been kind to give you so short a block. Bear in mind that you will be blocked, for longer periods of time, if you continue to engage in the behaviour that has caused so many problems. This includes, but is not limited to:
 * Edit warring
 * Calling other editors by offensive names like "dumbass"
 * Creating obviously uncitable or incorrect content

As a community, we can no longer assume good faith on your part, and your unwillingness to improve the quality of your work and ability to interact raises serious concerns; boldness is no excuse for consistently poor edits. I ask and other administrators to help me enforce this. I will not respond any further on this topic, but I'm sure someone among those I've pinged will be willing to respond, if you want to discuss this. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 21:19, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Considering that I've never done #3 (remember, that while you were not able to find citations for flag jack, I was), I don't even understand why that was on there. I also find the claim that you can no longer assume good faith on my part to be an unacceptable charge.  You should always assume good faith.  Also, why did you ping editors such as CodeCat and Ungoliant who are clearly hostile to me?  They should be disengaging from me. Pur ple back pack 89   21:25, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Furthermore, I consider my claim that I am "unwilling" to improve the quality of my edits. Maybe I make mistakes, but I don't tend to make the same mistake repeatedly.  For example, the reason I made a mistake on okolehao was because I'd never edited in Hawaiian before.  Also, if you're going to ping admins, ping as many of them as you can:  Pur ple back pack 89   21:30, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Calling people hostile is clearly not an assumption of good faith. —CodeCat 21:27, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Remember when I said above that you should be disengaging from me? Why do you think engaging here would result in anything productive?  Don't you have templates to move or something? Pur ple back pack 89   21:34, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Furthermore, CodeCat, remember when I said you don't understand what's good-faith and what's bad-faith? Just because I think you're hostile to me doesn't mean I think you should be indeffed and all your edits undone.  The edits I consider bad are the ones you've made on my talk page now, and Ungoliant's page earlier.  Contrast with Ungoliant, or Metaknowledge above, who seems to think that anything I do is in bad faith.  That's painting with far too broad a brush. Pur ple back pack 89   21:39, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Your snarky comments here are not helping your case. The entire discussion on Ungoliant's talk page was unproductive, but it didn't keep you from starting and contributing to it. And I don't think you can recognise your own bad faith behaviour, which is actually a very large part of why you butt heads with people so often. To be honest, it makes it kind of laughable when you try to educate others on their behaviour. As I said before, clean up your act and stop complaining. —CodeCat 21:42, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * It wasn't unproductive to justify a three-day block! Pur ple back pack 89  21:44, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * You don't think anything anyone ever does to you is justified. —CodeCat 21:45, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't think anybody blocking me is justified. I certainly don't think this block is justified.  I don't have problems with people improving entries I create, provided they give sensible reasons for doing so and don't insult me in edit summaries.  Pur ple back pack 89   21:47, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * That would be a reasonable request if you started with a blank slate. But your slate is far from blank, so people respond to you based on prior interactions with you. Ungoliant is clearly fed up with you, and as you said, it's fine to vent sometimes. —CodeCat 21:51, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Ungoliant's fed up with me, vented, and isn't blocked. I'm fed up at the two of you, vented, and am blocked.  Disengenous much? Pur ple back pack 89   21:54, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * You're the only one annoyed by Ungoliant's behaviour. But many people are annoyed with yours, as you well know. —CodeCat 21:56, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * If we do the same things, we should get the same punishment, regardless of who "likes" us and who "doesn't". This a Wiktionary, not a homecoming court. Pur ple back pack 89   22:01, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

please stop bailing him out. He’s annoying everybody and his behaviour is continuous. -- Romanophile ♞ (contributions) 21:59, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * It was a bad block, Romanophile. You don't block people's talk page access or email like that.  Also, being annoying isn't a reason for a block IMO.  There are lots of things that annoy me that haven't been blocked.  There are lots of things that annoy me that I just brush off. Pur ple back pack 89   22:01, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * It's also not "continuous". There are times when I go weeks or even months without posting on talk pages or Wiktionary.  To claim that I all I do is annoy other editors is ridiculous. Pur ple back pack 89   22:04, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Your entries today
Don't take it personally that I RFD'd them, I just truly believe we shouldn't have them. I was actually tempted to just revert/delete them, but I decided to give you the benefit of the doubt. --WikiTiki89 03:08, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I understand that field goal/free throw percentage might be at the line, but I felt it was something this project needed. Frankly, glad it was you and not somebody else. Pur ple back pack 89   04:58, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Archiving your talk page
I would like to make a gentle proposal (or hint?) that you archive your talk page like I or SemperBlotto do, per year. It creates a nice, predictable archive structure that has proved to work well. --Dan Polansky (talk) 11:17, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I have made a full 2014 and a full 2015. 2012 and 2013 were too small, so they are together. Pur ple back pack 89   13:28, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Your archives look nicer now. I've done the same, inspired by that hint. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 13:49, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
 * The coolest users, however, don't archive their talk pages at all. --SimonP45 (talk) 16:38, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Are you referring to users who a) have bots to do it, b) blank it from time to time, or c) just leave everything ever posted? Pur ple back pack 89
 * There's also d) Get indef-blocked, (often having your talk page deleted because you're indef-blocked) then switch to a new user name. This is just the usual WF silliness. Chuck Entz (talk) 19:02, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Well, no plans of doing that one. I know some people have a habit of comparing me to WonderFool, but continual socking coupled with high-volume creation is not something in my wheelhouse. Pur ple back pack 89   19:10, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Indeed, creating a large number of correct entries is not exactly something you do, so a comparison with WF wouldn't be very apt. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 22:15, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Ah, but consider how few entries I have created that have been deleted. Then look at how many WF and his myriad of socks have created that have... Pur ple back pack 89   22:18, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

"Hat collecting"
Your edit comment prompted me to look at your edit history. Your rollbacks categorize as follows: That adds up to exactly 4 (%50) of your rollbacks that were used for the intended purpose of the tool. Not that great of a track record, especially considering that it averages out to less than one good rollback a year (less than two a year total). Chuck Entz (talk) 19:13, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
 * 4 reversions of vandalism by IPs (one of those had you as the target, but it counts)
 * 2 apparent errors (you undid them in your next edit)
 * 2 against admins as part of disputes
 * You only got 8 uses? I got 10, and at least six instances of vandalism (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6), using this and searching "revert".  Also, the "one good rollback a year" number is a bit off, since I've only had rollback for two years.  As for "appropriate use", loads of admins use rollback to remove good-faith edits from their talk pages, so not sure you can use the "as part of the dispute" as errors.  And I again say, "when was the last time I misused it?"  The last time I used it for something that wasn't unambiguous vandalism was in June, and it was on my own talk page, where I have a great deal of latitude.  There's not really any point in taking it away, because there's not a widespread enough pattern of abuse...and that's assuming there is even such a thing as abuse, as we don't really have any guidelines for use.  And why are we discussing this anyway?  It's completely irrelevant to the deletion discussion where Ungoliant brought it up.   Ungoliant may be accusing me of "hat collecting", but he's more guilty of the opposite, "hat stealing", trying to take away privileges in an effort to make me look bad and generally piss me off.  Why is he so obsessed with taking away my user rights? Pur ple back pack 89   19:46, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Sorry if I came off as angry earlier, I'm just perturbed at Ungoliant's incessant drumbeat of trying to embarrass me off this project. Happy Thanksgiving. Pur ple back pack 89   21:45, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Deal
Hello! You added a definition for "Deal" in February (https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=deal&diff=prev&oldid=31966363 - sorry, don't know how to make a proper link) as a unit of firewood. I am about to remove it, because I guess it was based on the WP article Deal (unit), which I am also about to suggest for deletion, because I believe it is entirely bogus. Please check, and let me know (I'll watch here) if you know of any other basis for this. Please see my comments on the original source here: w:User:Imaginatorium/Cardarelli. Thanks Imaginatorium (talk) 05:21, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Before you take any action here, I think you may want to familiarize yourself with the rules and such of Wiktionary. On Wiktionary, we have entries that can be proven to have been used three times in a period of a year or more.  The term "deal" for a unit of wood has been used at least once, in Cardarelli, so one would only need to find two more uses for the entry to be kept.  If you believe those two uses do not exist, I suggest you start a request for verification on this entry. Pur ple back pack 89   15:01, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I now have the three citations in reference to deals that would be required to pass an RfV on this project. It appears that deal is an archaic term for a board between 12 and 14 feet long, traded as a commodity and likely used in shipbuilding. Pur ple back pack 89   15:23, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Howdy! I know there may be no way of easily answering this question, but are we sure that this definition shouldn't fall under etymology 3 which already contains:
 * Wood that is easy to saw (from conifers such as pine or fir)
 * A plank of softwood (fir or pine board)
 * I could see how the sense of a length of board could stem from either etymology. What do you think? — JohnC5 16:29, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Yeah, you're probably right. You can move it there. Pur ple back pack 89   17:57, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Done! <tt>:)</tt> — JohnC5 18:49, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

"troll" edit war
Sometimes Equinox does cross the line in the heat of a dispute, but I don't think that's the case here (at least in the core of the dispute). What he said, basically, was that you keep repeating the same argument even though your argument had no merit, so either: a) you don't understand or b) you're pretending not to understand and saying it anyway, which would be trolling.

Without going into whether there's validity to of any of those points, the statement as a whole wasn't an attack (it was basically of the same type as your reference to his "silly analogy"), and you overreacted to the mere presence of words that have been used to attack you in the past by posting a topic at the BP about it demanding immediate action, and posted a similar and quite obnoxious topic on Equinox's talk page, then edit warred with him about his removing it. The whole "fumigate" bit was wrong, but that's a side issue.

Faced with you repeatedly posting angry demands on his talk page, he gave you a one-hour block. Such ultra-short blacks are, in my experience, never used as a punishment. Usually the purpose is to either get someone's attention, or to stop them long enough so they can cool down and think about what they're doing.

Looking at the whole thread that started this, you responded to a rather mundane discussion about where to put a particular paragraph with an arguably off-topic rant about slippery-slope arguments in general, with the usual buzzwords from your personal ideology. From there, it spun out of control into an escalating cascade of overreaction on both sides. Singling out Equinox as the only bad actor in the whole mess was unfair, IMO. Chuck Entz (talk) 20:23, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

 * One small point of order: I didn't "edit war" on his page; each post on his page was different. I may have over-reacted to his use of the word "troll", but IMO the word "troll" is used far too cavalierly on this project, particularly by Ungoliant and Equinox.  The two of them know I despise the use of that word, yet neither seems to have enough common sense to stop using it.  The problem with what Equinox is saying is coming far too close to say, "either you buy into my logic, or you're a troll".  That doesn't seem right.  And why has it become "obnoxious" to ask that people stop using the word troll?  Why is it considered over-reacting to ask that it not be used?  You say that I singled out Equinox as the only bad actor, but IMO, he singled out me as the only bad actor.  Pur ple back pack 89   20:39, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

ok
Nothing Eran hammer (talk) 22:16, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

second division
"The half of the standings containing the teams with the worst records." Really? I've not come across this, where is it used? Renard Migrant (talk) 00:36, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Never heard of this in American sports either. In high-school and college-level sports, there are "divisions" like this where D1 (division 1, first division) is the most prestigious, but there are much more than two divisions, so D2 is not the "worse half". But perhaps this can be equated with second-rate, but then it would need a much less specific definition. --WikiTiki89 00:50, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
 * The term second division is chiefly used in baseball, especially before 1969 when the AL and NL were a single division, the metaphorical "second division" was the bottom half of the standings. You might want to check out |this Wikipedia article and |these Google books citations.  I am probably going to add one of the Google books citations to the definition. Pur ple back pack 89   00:57, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Oh, well then we need some context labels that say exactly what you just said here. --WikiTiki89 00:59, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I have added "chiefly baseball" and "dated" as contexts, plus usage notes. Pur ple back pack 89  01:03, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I made some changes as well. --WikiTiki89 01:13, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Purplebackpack89/Archive 3


text:
User talk:Daniel Carrero/2012

Thank you
Thank you for the additions of links at Citations:assholocracy! Much appreciated, -- Cirt (talk) 05:57, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

 * ^-^ --Daniel 06:22, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
 * You think some of those redlinks should be created as new pages? :) -- Cirt (talk) 07:30, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
 * As long as they are attestable by three citations each, why not. --Daniel 07:36, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Okay, I'll try to do some research on that! ;) -- Cirt (talk) 20:13, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

It seems there's an emergency effort to try to get these pages deleted real fast for some unknown urgent reason. I'd appreciate any advice you could impart to me about that. Perhaps you could revisit Citations:assholocracy? Thank you for your time, -- Cirt (talk) 03:56, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
 * If you can attest the words in question (assholocracy, assholeocracy, arseoleocracy, assholocrat and assholeocrat), then they would be kept. Even if they get deleted prematurely, they could be restored once attested.
 * As I checked Google Groups and Google Books in a few minutes, I did not find any new content to add to Citations:assholocracy, so most likely the entries will get deleted, indeed; the citations page can stay, nonetheless.
 * Amusingly, for some reason, "assholocracy" returns 19 results in GB, but the resulting books either seem to not actually have that word, or are not viewable at all. --Daniel 10:24, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, do you think based on Citations:assholocracy, at the very least the main entry for assholocracy should be kept, along with the citations page? -- Cirt (talk) 08:19, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
 * As far as I know, only one citation counts, if it can be found in a print book: "We are living, he observed, in the age of the assholocracy. He's right, you know."
 * Most other citations don't count because they are not the word being used in a phrase. "Most Outrageous: "assholocracy", meaning rule by the disgustingly super-rich." is just a definition. It is a mention.
 * Please see: --[[User:Daniel Carrero|Daniel] 09:52, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I know. But there are plenty of other cites at assholocracy. Those are satisfactory, yes? -- Cirt (talk) 19:36, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
 * After you asked me to check the cites, a couple of days ago, I noticed that almost all cites with the specific word "assholocracy" at the pages assholocracy and Citations:assholocracy are mentions, not uses.
 * "Assholocracy won the award for the outrageous word of the year."
 * "there’s assholocracy, concisely defined as “rule by obnoxious multi-millionaires.”"
 * "Most Outrageous: "assholocracy", meaning rule by the disgustingly super-rich."
 * "new additions to pre-existing blends, like assholocracy"
 * "My favorite was "assholocracy", which won "most outrageous"."
 * The only exception is the one I pointed above: "We are living, he observed, in the age of the assholocracy. He's right, you know." So, assuming this one counts, then that word needs two additional citations that count, to be kept. --Daniel 19:49, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes but what about the alternative spellings? Aren't they usages of the same meaning? -- Cirt (talk) 20:05, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, some other citations are usages. Their meanings vary a little, though. From my count, none of these words is currently attested, though. I don't know any rule along the lines of "if three books use the same word, each book using a different spelling, then the word is attested". I believe each spelling would have to be attested on its own. The usages are:
 * "Whicg[sic] of these did the assholeocrats get rid of?"; He is the elder statesman of tge[sic] assholeocrat party."
 * "Could simply gather them under a uniform label: Arseholeocracy" (this one could be controversial)
 * "He is the elder statesman of tge[sic] assholeocrat party."
 * "you can't say they are all automatically assholes simply because they work within the ubiquitous Assholeocracy."
 * "We are living, he observed, in the age of the assholocracy. He's right, you know."
 * --Daniel 12:22, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, those all do seem quite similar, and the spellings could simply be typos in some cases. -- Cirt (talk) 20:09, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Arguing that is possible.
 * DCDuring recently mentioned at WT:RFD a way to check for typos and scannos, that may apply to the issue in question: "It is easy enough to see whether any single instance of Chineseman occurs on the same page or adjoining pages with Chinese man and to inspect the page image for scannos." --Daniel 20:27, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm quite certain I've also read other users state that it's okay to use alternate spellings to support the same word before, I'll try to research where I saw that. -- Cirt (talk) 20:31, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

deus
I don't know any Portuguese but the plural for this word seems a bit unlikely... can you check it please? —CodeCat 20:02, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
 * ✓ --Daniel 20:07, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

CFI and company names
Do you intend to vote in Votes/pl-2012-02/CFI and company names? You have made a comment in the vote, but given no vote, which surprised me. --Dan Polansky 09:25, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes. I voted now. --Daniel 19:05, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

CFI and straw poll
What do you think of your withdrawing Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2012-01/Linking "Straw Poll: each section of our CFI" from the CFI? Then it can be removed from WT:VOTE. You have even opposed the vote yourself. I don't think anyone's going to complain if you withdraw the vote. Just an idea. --Dan Polansky 10:09, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * ✓ --Daniel 19:09, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Votes/pl-2012-03/Minor ELE fix
I edited the page so removed your vote; please revote. Sorry for the hassle. —msh210℠ (talk) 22:40, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
 * You may want to double-check that vote and edit it again. There's a " Cite error: tags exist, but no tag was found " somewhere. --Daniel 22:49, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

"::The vote is on removing the quoted sentence, which includes a <ref> tag. The error notice is a byproduct. —msh210℠ (talk) 06:57, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

changes
I like the changes you made. I think this is much clearer now --Cova (talk) 12:06, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Good. --Daniel 12:45, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Editing CFI
I think you would do well to reduce the number of subsequent edits when editing CFI, which can be achieved by using the preview function, deliberately slowing down, and carefully thnking about the edit that you are about to make. Another option is that you stop editing CFI without a vote. I know your edits were related to the use of references, but I still find them objectionable. In February and March of 2012, you have made 21 edits to CFI. --Dan Polansky (talk) 19:52, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I am going to try to avoid series of cosmetic corrections, along the lines of "Oh, I just placed a bold text here, but I prefer it non-bolded instead!" That's just noise on the history, and demonstrates that I didn't use the preview function satisfactorily.
 * On the other hand, my original plan of mentioning one vote per revision looks good in the history, as it's abundantly clear what I have done. It's clearer than a single revision explained like "Adding 15 footnotes", but this would be a good alternative plan, too, for conciseness. Either way, deciding about this specific dichotomy (adding one footnote per revision or many footnotes in one revision, assuming that footnotes can be added, to begin with) looks like a moot point today, if I could successfully make sure that all the applicable votes are mentioned in CFI and ELE.
 * The current tally of our vote about voting suggests that, in the near future, only discussions and consensus would be enough to edit these policies.
 * Apart from that, we have some history of editing CFI and ELE to add references to votes even when the votes do not state that a reference should be added. This revision is an early example from last year, a little earlier than the vote Sourced policies.
 * I'm not sure what you mean by "objectionable", so you might want to elaborate this statement. I believe you don't oppose the practice of adding unvoted references to votes in CFI, in general, because you supported that practice, in Sourced policies and in Modify WT:ELE rhymes section.
 * So, I infer that you might find objectionable some specific edits I have done. If this inference is correct, I'm not sure exactly which edits. Nonetheless, I see that the different edits have different levels of importance. The votes I have added fit well into three categories in my mind: (1) major/active, describing rules that are remembered often in discussions, like WT:COALMINE and Votes/pl-2008-01/Appendices for fictional terms; (2) minor/passive, rules that are often undisputed and undiscussed like Votes/pl-2007-07/Exclusion of possessive case and cosmetic changes like Votes/pl-2011-02/Renaming CFI section for spellings; (3) neutral or niche, that govern a comparatively small number of entries (such as a single language), like Votes/2011-06/Redirecting combining characters and Votes/2011-09/Unified Tagalog. The first category is very important. I believe the second is less useful in practice, and probably can be deleted harmlessly, yet keeping it seems equally harmless; I'd keep it for curious minds like mine. The last category might be moved to other policy pages when they exist and are authoritative enough. --Daniel 16:19, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

catboiler subtemplates
I noticed that the subtemplates like catboiler categorize, catboiler doc, catboiler format and so on were originally subtemplates: catboiler/categorize, catboiler/doc, catboiler/format... Is there a reason why you changed this? 15:59, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Predefinição pt-verb
Oi, Daniel.

Encontrei um problema na predefinição pt-verb: ela está chamando o tempo verbal gerúndio de "particípio presente". Veja, por exemplo, gostar: lá consta que "gostando" é present participle de "gostar". Está errado: o particípio presente de "gostar", se existisse, seria "gost ante ", e "gostante" não é verbo (ao contrário de "gostando", que, justamente por estar no gerúndio, é verbo).

A terminação do particípio presente é sempre -ante, -ente ou -into: ► Sampayu [msg ] 07:41, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
 * (verbo) cantar + -ante = cant ante  (que é adjetivo, não verbo. Exemplo: pessoa cantante)
 * (verbo) correr + -ente =  corr ente  (que é adjetivo, não verbo. Exemplo: água corrente)
 * (verbo) constituir + -inte = constitu inte  (que é adjetivo, não verbo. Exemplo: assembleia constituinte)

Category:Portuguese adverbs suffixed with -mente
Is it necessary for this category to specify the part of speech? (Also Category:Portuguese nouns suffixed with -a.) I was about to change them but I decided to ask what your reasoning was first. Ultimateria (talk) 20:53, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

How are you?
Hola senhor; long time no see. You may not recognise me, but I signed my e‐mails (to you) as ‘Seth’, & Stephen helped me alter my title now that Doremítzwr left. I personally believe that this title behoves me more‐so than my last one. I desired to ask you why you had not answered my e‐mail I sent a few months ago. And I suppose that I ought to thank you for partially unblocking me, but I honestly can’t promise you that I will not ‘ragequit’ again if somebody ruffles my feathers. I’ll just have to mellow out more (being an adult now should help). Regardless, I wanted to enquire what has been going on with you recently; I hope that you are fine. --Æ&Œ (talk) 23:59, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: User talk:Daniel Carrero/2012


text: mainpernour

title: mainpernour


text: mainpernours

title: mainpernours


text:
User talk:Daniel Carrero/2013

Wikisaurus and attestation
As you are someone with a significant contribution to Wikisaurus, I'd like to bring Votes/pl-2013-09/Wikisaurus_and_attestation to your attention. --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:31, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you. --Daniel 15:36, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Category:All spellings
Hi,

Is this category you created in 2009 is still useful? — Automatik (talk) 13:12, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Definitely not, since we don't have categories like Category:English alternative spellings anymore. Thanks for asking. --Daniel 23:01, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Ok. Do you delete empty categories here? — Automatik (talk) 11:59, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes. Sounds uncontroversial, so I went and did it. It could be undeleted/recreated if others see fit. --Daniel 13:58, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

RFDO on some items
Just to be fair, FYI: Requests_for_deletion/Others. --Dan Polansky (talk) 18:45, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Template:place:Brazil
Hey. Can we safely delete Template:place:Brazil? --ElisaVan (talk) 11:48, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Sorry for taking some time to answer. Sure, please go ahead if you'd like. That's just an old project that didn't go very far. --Daniel 11:27, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

title: User talk:Daniel Carrero/2013


text:
bedøvelse

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  anesthesia
 * 2) an anesthetic

title: bedøvelse


text:
User talk:Daniel Carrero/2014

I was absent from Wiktionary in 2014, nothing here. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 13:47, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Daniel Carrero/2014


text: boying

title: boying


text: boyed

title: boyed


text:
ब्राह्मी

Etymology
.

Proper noun

 * 1) Brahmi script

Noun

 * 1) water hyssop

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) Brahmi script
 * 2) The personified female energy of Brahman
 * 3) Sarasvatī, the goddess of speech
 * 4) Speech
 * 5) A tale or narrative
 * 6) A pious usage or custom, Vedic rituals
 * 7) N. of the constellation Rohiṇī
 * 8) N. of Durgā
 * 9) A woman married according to the Brāhma form of marriage
 * 10) The wife of a Brāhmaṇa
 * 11) A kind of medicinal plant
 * 12) A kind of brass
 * 13) name of a river

title: ब्राह्मी


text:
𐌷𐌰𐍂𐌾𐌹𐍃

Etymology
From, from. The -jis in the nominative singular results from with the oblique forms, as the expected outcome of *-jaz in Gothic following a consonant would otherwise have been *-is. Other examples of this development include, , and.

Noun

 * 1)  army

title: 𐌷𐌰𐍂𐌾𐌹𐍃


text: aquilegias

title: aquilegias


text:
bequiffed

Adjective

 * 1) Having a quiff hairstyle.

title: bequiffed


text:
bareroot

Noun

 * 1)  A plant removed from soil in a dormant state, from which it can more rapidly acclimate to new soil conditions.

title: bareroot


text: bareroots

title: bareroots


text:
bibliometrician

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) One who studies bibliometrics.

title: bibliometrician


text: bibliometricians

title: bibliometricians


text:
Talk:terraceous

Is this word obsolete?
I had to spell this word in a spelling bee. The only citations of it I have found in books are in books published in the late 19th century. I had never heard of the word before my spelling bee, and I misspelled it. So, I was wondering - is this word obsolete or is it still used in the modern day? SalmonCat (talk) 14:11, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

 * Apparently not very much use after the 1800s. I'll put "archaic" on it; "obsolete" would be a bit older than that. Equinox ◑ 14:16, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

title: Talk:terraceous


text: defasciculated

title: defasciculated


text: defasciculates

title: defasciculates


text: defasciculating

title: defasciculating


text: bedøvelsen

title: bedøvelsen


text: electrophilicities

title: electrophilicities


text:
erinacine

Noun

 * 1)  Any of various compounds isolated from.

title: erinacine


text: erinacines

title: erinacines


text: bedøvelser

title: bedøvelser


text: bedøvelsene

title: bedøvelsene


text:
hericenone

Noun

 * 1)  Any of various isolates of  that promote nerve growth factor synthesis in vitro.

title: hericenone


text: hericenones

title: hericenones


text:
monoarthritic

Adjective

 * 1) Exhibiting, or relating to, monoarthritis.

title: monoarthritic


text: monostands

title: monostands


text:
दीवान

Etymology
, from. .

Noun

 * 1) royal court, tribunal
 * 2) minister of state, divan
 * 3) divan collection of poems

title: दीवान


text:
दिवि

Noun

 * 1)  blue jay

title: दिवि


text:
fostemsavir

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  An experimental HIV entry inhibitor that is a prodrug of temsavir.

title: fostemsavir


text:
pradofloxacin

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  A particular veterinary antibiotic of the fluoroquinolone class.

title: pradofloxacin


text:
unmigrated

Adjective

 * 1) Not migrated.

title: unmigrated


text: thermocycles

title: thermocycles


text: arienne

title: arienne


text: ariens

title: ariens


text: ariennes

title: ariennes


text: affinizations

title: affinizations


text: affinisation

title: affinisation


text: affinisations

title: affinisations


text:
arminianisme

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  Arminianism

Usage notes

 * The term was originally at least somewhat derogatory, but is now chiefly used as a theological and historical term.

Noun

 * 1) Arminianism

title: arminianisme


text:
arille

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  aril

title: arille


text: arisant

title: arisant


text: arisé

title: arisé


text: arisée

title: arisée


text: arisés

title: arisés


text: arisées

title: arisées


text: ariser

title: ariser


text: arisons

title: arisons


text: arisez

title: arisez


text: arisent

title: arisent


text: arisais

title: arisais


text: arisait

title: arisait


text: arisions

title: arisions


text: arisiez

title: arisiez


text: arisaient

title: arisaient


text: arisai

title: arisai


text: arisas

title: arisas


text: arisa

title: arisa


text: arisâmes

title: arisâmes


text: arisâtes

title: arisâtes


text: arisèrent

title: arisèrent


text: ariserai

title: ariserai


text: ariseras

title: ariseras


text: arisera

title: arisera


text: ariserons

title: ariserons


text: ariserez

title: ariserez


text: ariseront

title: ariseront


text: ariserais

title: ariserais


text: ariserait

title: ariserait


text: ariserions

title: ariserions


text: ariseriez

title: ariseriez


text: ariseraient

title: ariseraient


text: arisasse

title: arisasse


text: arisasses

title: arisasses


text: arisât

title: arisât


text: arisassions

title: arisassions


text: arisassiez

title: arisassiez


text: arisassent

title: arisassent


text:
aristarque

Noun

 * 1) aristarch

title: aristarque


text:
Reconstruction:Proto-Germanic/stauraz

Etymology 1
From, ultimately from.

Noun

 * 1)  stake
 * 2) rod, pole
 * 1) rod, pole

Etymology 2
From, from ,.

Noun

 * 1)  destruction
 * 2)  disturbance

title: Reconstruction:Proto-Germanic/stauraz


text:
aristophanesque

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) Aristophanic, Aristophanean

title: aristophanesque


text:
𐍅𐌹𐌲𐍃

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) road
 * 2) path

title: 𐍅𐌹𐌲𐍃


text:
Aristophane

Etymology
, itself a borrowing from.

Proper noun

 * 1) Aristophanes

title: Aristophane


text:
झूला

Noun

 * 1) swing
 * 2) hammock
 * 3) cradle

title: झूला


text:
𐍃𐌺𐌰𐌻𐌺𐍃

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) slave
 * 2) servant

title: 𐍃𐌺𐌰𐌻𐌺𐍃


text:
aristotélique

Adjective

 * 1) Aristotelian

title: aristotélique


text:
arithméticien

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  arithmetician

title: arithméticien


text:
arithmomanie

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) arithmomania

title: arithmomanie


text:
self-pollinating

Etymology
, from

Adjective

 * 1)  relating to plants that pollinate themselves, either with pollen from the same flower or from a neighbouring flower on the same plant.

title: self-pollinating


text:
Thread:User talk:CodeCat/Declension class fi:solakka/reply (2)

It's strange, because normally the illative plural has the strong grade doesn't it? I wonder why there's this exception. Anyway, I've swapped the forms around. Should the same be done for the class?


text:
𐌻𐌰𐌿𐍆𐍃

Etymology
From. Cognate to 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬 and 🇨🇬. The Germanic cognates are neuter, and Lehmann believes that this term in the sense of "foliage" is neuter as well and contrasts with the masculine "leaf", comparing the relationship between those two to that between and.

Noun

 * 1)  leaf part of a plant
 * 2)  foliage
 * 1)  foliage

title: 𐌻𐌰𐌿𐍆𐍃


text:
arlequinade

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) harlequinade
 * 2) buffoonery

title: arlequinade


text:
User:Doric Loon

I mainly work on the English-language Wikipedia. If you want to know more about me, look at my user-page there.

title: User:Doric Loon


text:
arlequin

Noun

 * 1) harlequin
 * 2) buffoon
 * 3) jester

title: arlequin


text: nightingale floor

title: nightingale floor


text: nightingale floors

title: nightingale floors


text:
𐌻𐌹𐌲𐍂𐍃

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) bed

Declension
Cat:got:Furniture Cat:got:Sleep

title: 𐌻𐌹𐌲𐍂𐍃


text:
arlésien

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1)  of Arles

title: arlésien


text:
tahong

Noun

 * 1) the
 * 2)  the vagina

Etymology
Compare 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1)  vulva
 * 1)  vulva

title: tahong


text: 江淮戲

title: 江淮戲


text:
hanggaon

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) afflicted by chickenpox

title: hanggaon


text:
trunk or treat

Noun

 * 1)  An organized alternative to trick-or-treating where candy is handed out to children from cars in a parking lot.

Verb

 * 1)  To participate in a trunk or treat event as a child.

title: trunk or treat


text:
outwill

Verb

 * 1)  To surpass in force of will.

title: outwill


text: outwilled

title: outwilled


text: outwills

title: outwills


text: outwilling

title: outwilling


text: wikicode

title: wikicode


text:
sinthomosexual

Etymology
.

Adjective

 * 1) Having no personal interest in the future of humanity because of one's (non-heterosexual, therefore non-reproductive) sexual orientation

Noun

 * 1) One who has no personal interest in the future of humanity because of his/her own (non-heterosexual, therefore non-reproductive) sexual orientation

title: sinthomosexual


text:
sinthomosexuality

Noun

 * 1) The condition of being sinthomosexual

title: sinthomosexuality


text:
anthropophonics

Noun

 * 1) The study of the full range of human vocalizations.

title: anthropophonics


text:
samāpatti

Noun

 * 1) attainment

title: samāpatti


text:
backlining

Noun

 * 1)  The positioning of amplifiers behind the performers when playing on a stage.
 * 2)  A lining in the backbone of a book.

title: backlining


text:
empoweree

Noun

 * 1) One who is empowered.

title: empoweree


text: empowerees

title: empowerees


text:
krysning

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) crossing
 * 2) a cross

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) a cross

title: krysning


text:
conjunctural

Adjective

 * 1) Relating to, or caused by conjunctures

Etymology
.

title: conjunctural


text:
सख़्तदिल

Adjective

 * 1) hard-hearted

title: सख़्तदिल


text:
conjuncturalism

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) The study of the conjunctures that influence interacting cultures.

title: conjuncturalism


text:
Reconstruction:Proto-Germanic/awô

Etymology
From, an on-stem variant of. Compare in particular 🇨🇬 and 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1)  grandfather

Descendants

 * (possibly; alternatively from )

title: Reconstruction:Proto-Germanic/awô


text:
armãtusescu

Etymology 1
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to arm (oneself)

Etymology 2
From.

Verb

 * 1) to adorn, dress well, embellish

title: armãtusescu


text:
maache

Etymology
From, from , from , from.

Verb

 * 1)  to make, form, produce, create (an object, arrangement, situation, etc.)
 * 2)  to make, prepare
 * 3)  to do
 * 4)  to make to cause to be
 * 5)  to make, be, equal the result of a calculation
 * 6)  to make, earn to earn, gain wages, profit, etc.
 * 7)  to matter to be important
 * 8)  to do one's business, do number two or number one, go to defecate or urinate
 * 9)  to do to fare or perform (well or poorly)
 * 10)  to live
 * 1)  to matter to be important
 * 2)  to do one's business, do number two or number one, go to defecate or urinate
 * 3)  to do to fare or perform (well or poorly)
 * 4)  to live
 * 1)  to do to fare or perform (well or poorly)
 * 2)  to live
 * 1)  to live
 * 1)  to live

Usage notes

 * The forms mäht, maach; maht, mäht; jemaht, jemaach are Ripuarian. The forms mächt, micht; muuch, mooch; gemaach(t) are Moselle Franconian.
 * The Limburgan-Ripuarian Transitional Dialects mostly use forms similar to Ripuarian, although the spelling differs: maat; maachet; jemaad. They also use the present participle forms maachend and maachens.

title: maache


text:
countersupport

Noun

 * 1)  given to the contrary of an argument, theory etc.

Verb

 * 1) To provide such support

title: countersupport


text:
balihon

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to invert, to reverse
 * 2) to flip something over
 * 3) to turn upside down

title: balihon


text: Template:votes

title: Template:votes


text:
isozmã

Noun
(plural isozmati/isozmate)

 * 1) betrothal, engagement

title: isozmã


text:
eumycotic

Adjective

 * 1) Relating to the fungi of the former kingdom

title: eumycotic


text:
arãvoanã

Etymology
From.

Noun
(plural arãvoani/arãvoane)

 * 1) deposit
 * 2) the object given as a pledge for a future marriage, such as a ring
 * 3) engagement

title: arãvoanã


text:
folistic

Adjective

 * 1)  Describing a epipedon that is normally saturated for less than 30 days per year and is more than 15-20 cm thick

title: folistic


text:
isusescu

Verb

 * 1) to become engaged, betroth

title: isusescu


text:
njari

Etymology
From, from. Compare 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) honey

title: njari


text:
illeity

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  An external embodiment of the self.

title: illeity


text: krysninga

title: krysninga


text: krysningen

title: krysningen


text: krysninger

title: krysninger


text: krysningene

title: krysningene


text:
कलाकार

Etymology
From, both of which are words.

Noun

 * 1) artist, one skilled in an art
 * 2) a skilled performer
 * 3) an actor

Declension
NOTE: This term is declined masculine or feminine according to the gender of the referent.

Etymology
From, both of which are words. Cognate with 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) artist, one skilled in an art
 * 2) a skilled performer
 * 3) an actor or actress
 * 1) an actor or actress

title: कलाकार


text: krysningar

title: krysningar


text: krysningane

title: krysningane


text:
Talk:ὑμεῖς

descent
In dialects: ὕμμες, ὑμέες. Coming h- from *s- (or *w-), and [y] from [u], we would have something like *sumes / summes for the pronun ye. Now, surprisingly enough, ye in Hittite is sum(m)ēs!!--Manfariel (talk) 16:55, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Very interesting. It would be wonderful to be able to verify this and list the Hittite form in the etymology section. Wonder if it has a Wiktionary entry. I think there is also a similar form in Sanskrit: second person accusative plural yuṣmān. Perhaps I'll add that tomorrow. — Eru·tuon 11:05, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:ὑμεῖς


text:
Talk:vertically challenged

This is a joke of a politically correct term. Tagging it "politically correct" will land it in the "English politically correct terms" category, even though it is not considered politically correct. Please consider revising.
 * I’ve removed it from the category. — Ungoliant (falai) 17:35, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

title: Talk:vertically challenged


text:
nearcã

Noun
(plural neartsi / neartse)

title: nearcã


text: Category:Newar terms derived from Proto-Sino-Tibetan


text: Category:Newar terms derived from Sino-Tibetan languages


text:
nuercu

Etymology
Probably regressively derived from as a masculine equivalent. Compare also 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) stepfather

title: nuercu


text: nercu

title: nercu


text:
pãndzinã

Etymology
From 🇨🇬. Related to.

Noun

 * 1) spiderweb

title: pãndzinã


text:
pânză de păianjen

Etymology
+ +.

Noun

 * 1) spiderweb

title: pânză de păianjen


text:
kietas

Etymology
Compare 🇨🇬.

Adjective

 * 1) hard, solid
 * kíetas  - a hard shell of an egg etc.
 * kíetas  - a fast sleep
 * kíetas  - a fast sleep

title: kietas


text:
merimangã

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) spider

title: merimangã


text: hybriden

title: hybriden


text: maramangã

title: maramangã


text:
Reconstruction:Proto-Finnic/kaivadak

Etymology
From. Cognates include 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1) to dig up, to excavate

title: Reconstruction:Proto-Finnic/kaivadak


text:
Talk:легче

Is гч pronounced хч consistently in exactly the same two roots where гк is pronounced хк? If so I could fix the pronunciation and translit modules accordingly. Benwing2 (talk) 17:47, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Two variants are possible, with гч and хч.--Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 22:27, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Error in pronunciation?
I think the second vowel should be /ɪ/ rather than /e/. That's how it is on the Russian page, and all the material I've read about Russian vowel reduction seems to indicate that that would be the case. I'm not sure how to change the pronunciation, though. Yeticarlken (talk) 22:16, 21 February 2020 (UTC)Yeticarlken

title: Talk:легче


text: hybridene

title: hybridene


text:
Talk:смягчение

Should this word, for example, have phonetic хч in it? Benwing2 (talk) 17:49, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Two variants are possible.--Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 22:28, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
 * хч is standard.--Cinemantique (talk) 23:28, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

title: Talk:смягчение


text: hybridar

title: hybridar


text:
atomweight

Noun

 * 1)  The weight class below strawweight of less than 105 lbs.
 * 2) A fighter in this category.

title: atomweight


text:
Reconstruction:Proto-Finnic/kantadak

Etymology
From. Cognates include 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1) to carry

title: Reconstruction:Proto-Finnic/kantadak


text: hybridane

title: hybridane


text: Wiktionary:Foreign Word of the Day/2015/November 15


text:
Reconstruction:Proto-Finnic/kattadak

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to cover
 * 2) to roof

title: Reconstruction:Proto-Finnic/kattadak


text:
syndrome de Paris

Noun

 * 1) Paris syndrome

title: syndrome de Paris


text:
truquito

Etymology
From.

title: truquito


text: isletas

title: isletas


text:
isleta

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) refuge island; pedestrian island

title: isleta


text:
adentrar

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to get into, to go into
 * 2)  to push (violently) into
 * 3)  to concentrate, to meditate

title: adentrar


text: tanquistas

title: tanquistas


text: subfusiles

title: subfusiles


text: retardos

title: retardos


text: peloides

title: peloides


text: islitas

title: islitas


text: coleguitas

title: coleguitas


text: botellitas

title: botellitas


text:
botellita

Etymology
From.

title: botellita


text:
islita

Etymology
From.

title: islita


text:
coleguita

Etymology
From.

title: coleguita


text: nimbados

title: nimbados


text:
Reconstruction:Proto-Finnic/lagittadak

Etymology 1
Borrowed from and further derived with.

Verb

 * 1) to place, to put down

Descendants

 * North Karelian:
 * South Karelian:
 * North Karelian:
 * South Karelian:
 * South Karelian:

Etymology 2
Probably borrowed from and further derived with, or of the same origin as etymology 1.

Verb

 * 1) to criticize

title: Reconstruction:Proto-Finnic/lagittadak


text:
subfusil

Noun

 * 1) submachinegun

title: subfusil


text:
tanquista

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) tank driver

title: tanquista


text:
peloide

Noun

 * 1) peloid

title: peloide


text: concesionando

title: concesionando


text: concesionabais

title: concesionabais


text: concesionareis

title: concesionareis


text: concesionaste

title: concesionaste


text:
pejerrey

Etymology
From.

title: pejerrey


text: concesionan

title: concesionan


text: concesionás

title: concesionás


text: concesionen

title: concesionen


text: concesionéis

title: concesionéis


text: concesionaran

title: concesionaran


text: concesionamos

title: concesionamos


text: concesionases

title: concesionases


text: concesionará

title: concesionará


text: concesionad

title: concesionad


text: concesionarías

title: concesionarías


text:
concesionare

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) concession

title: concesionare


text: concesionés

title: concesionés


text: concesionaré

title: concesionaré


text: concesioná

title: concesioná


text: concesionarán

title: concesionarán


text: concesionaríais

title: concesionaríais


text: concesionas

title: concesionas


text: concesionarás

title: concesionarás


text: concesionarían

title: concesionarían


text: concesionáis

title: concesionáis


text: concesionasen

title: concesionasen


text: concesionaron

title: concesionaron


text: concesionabas

title: concesionabas


text: concesionaría

title: concesionaría


text: concesionásemos

title: concesionásemos


text: concesionaseis

title: concesionaseis


text: concesionemos

title: concesionemos


text:
nimbado

Adjective

 * 1) decorated

title: nimbado


text: concesionara

title: concesionara


text: concesionasteis

title: concesionasteis


text: concesionaban

title: concesionaban


text: concesionaríamos

title: concesionaríamos


text: concesionó

title: concesionó


text: concesionábamos

title: concesionábamos


text: concesionaren

title: concesionaren


text: concesionáramos

title: concesionáramos


text: concesionaréis

title: concesionaréis


text: concesionáremos

title: concesionáremos


text:
concesiona

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to concession

title: concesiona


text: concesionaba

title: concesionaba


text: correbous

title: correbous


text: concesionarais

title: concesionarais


text: concesione

title: concesione


text: concesionase

title: concesionase


text: concesionaras

title: concesionaras


text: concesioné

title: concesioné


text: concesionares

title: concesionares


text: concesiono

title: concesiono


text: concesionaremos

title: concesionaremos


text: concesionado

title: concesionado


text: concesionada

title: concesionada


text: concesionados

title: concesionados


text: concesionadas

title: concesionadas


text:
correbou

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) bull run without bullfighting

Etymology
.

title: correbou


text: estereotipaba

title: estereotipaba


text: estereotipé

title: estereotipé


text: estereotipáis

title: estereotipáis


text:
youtuber

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) YouTuber

Etymology
.

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) YouTuber

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) YouTuber

Etymology
.

Adjective

 * 1)  YouTube

Noun

 * 1) YouTuber

title: youtuber


text: estereotipabas

title: estereotipabas


text: estereotipaban

title: estereotipaban


text: estereotipáremos

title: estereotipáremos


text: estereotipó

title: estereotipó


text: estereotipare

title: estereotipare


text: estereotiparán

title: estereotiparán


text: estereotiparéis

title: estereotiparéis


text: estereotiparías

title: estereotiparías


text: estereotiparon

title: estereotiparon


text: estereotiparían

title: estereotiparían


text: estereotipan

title: estereotipan


text: estereotipás

title: estereotipás


text: estereotipasteis

title: estereotipasteis


text: estereotipábamos

title: estereotipábamos


text: estereotiparais

title: estereotiparais


text: estereotiparía

title: estereotiparía


text: estereotipases

title: estereotipases


text: estereotipasen

title: estereotipasen


text: estereotiparíais

title: estereotiparíais


text: estereotipá

title: estereotipá


text: estereotipase

title: estereotipase


text: estereotipad

title: estereotipad


text: estereotipabais

title: estereotipabais


text: estereotipaseis

title: estereotipaseis


text:
tonificar

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to tonify, invigorate, fortify

Verb

 * 1)  to tone, tone up

title: tonificar


text: estereotipéis

title: estereotipéis


text: estereotipásemos

title: estereotipásemos


text:
aleapid

Etymology
Probably from. Compare 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1) to drop, get rid of, throw away

title: aleapid


text: pretendé

title: pretendé


text: pretendás

title: pretendás


text: reencuentran

title: reencuentran


text: reencuentres

title: reencuentres


text: reencuentren

title: reencuentren


text: reencuentras

title: reencuentras


text: reencuentra

title: reencuentra


text: reencuentre

title: reencuentre


text: reinvirtieres

title: reinvirtieres


text: reinvirtieron

title: reinvirtieron


text: reinvirtieses

title: reinvirtieses


text: reinvertirás

title: reinvertirás


text: reinvirtamos

title: reinvirtamos


text: reinvertíais

title: reinvertíais


text: reinvertirías

title: reinvertirías


text: reinvertiré

title: reinvertiré


text: reinvertí

title: reinvertí


text: reinvirtáis

title: reinvirtáis


text: reinvirtierais

title: reinvirtierais


text: reinvertiréis

title: reinvertiréis


text: reinvertirían

title: reinvertirían


text: reinvertirá

title: reinvertirá


text: reinvertirán

title: reinvertirán


text: reinvirtieren

title: reinvirtieren


text: reinvirtió

title: reinvirtió


text: reinvirtiera

title: reinvirtiera


text: reinvertía

title: reinvertía


text: reinvirtiesen

title: reinvirtiesen


text: reinvirtiésemos

title: reinvirtiésemos


text: reinvertisteis

title: reinvertisteis


text: reinviertan

title: reinviertan


text: reinviertes

title: reinviertes


text: reinvirtiere

title: reinvirtiere


text: reinvertís

title: reinvertís


text: reinvierten

title: reinvierten


text: reinviertas

title: reinviertas


text: reinvertiremos

title: reinvertiremos


text: reinvirtás

title: reinvirtás


text: reinvertid

title: reinvertid


text: reinvertías

title: reinvertías


text: reinvirtiéremos

title: reinvirtiéremos


text: reinvirtieseis

title: reinvirtieseis


text: reinvertiríamos

title: reinvertiríamos


text: reinvierta

title: reinvierta


text: reinvierte

title: reinvierte


text: reinvierto

title: reinvierto


text: reinvertían

title: reinvertían


text: reinvirtiese

title: reinvirtiese


text: reinvirtieran

title: reinvirtieran


text: reinvertiste

title: reinvertiste


text: mójalo

title: mójalo


text: reinvirtiendo

title: reinvirtiendo


text: reinvertiría

title: reinvertiría


text: reinvertimos

title: reinvertimos


text: reinvirtieras

title: reinvirtieras


text: reinvirtiéramos

title: reinvirtiéramos


text: reinvirtiereis

title: reinvirtiereis


text: reinvertíamos

title: reinvertíamos


text: reinvertiríais

title: reinvertiríais


text: reinvertido

title: reinvertido


text: reinvertida

title: reinvertida


text: reinvertidos

title: reinvertidos


text: reinvertidas

title: reinvertidas


text: renderizan

title: renderizan


text: renderizá

title: renderizá


text: rendericemos

title: rendericemos


text: renderizase

title: renderizase


text: renderizasteis

title: renderizasteis


text: renderizáis

title: renderizáis


text: rendericen

title: rendericen


text: renderice

title: renderice


text: rendericéis

title: rendericéis


text: renderizases

title: renderizases


text: renderizaren

title: renderizaren


text: renderizasen

title: renderizasen


text: renderizásemos

title: renderizásemos


text: renderizarías

title: renderizarías


text: renderizabais

title: renderizabais


text: renderizarán

title: renderizarán


text: renderizó

title: renderizó


text: renderizás

title: renderizás


text: renderices

title: renderices


text: renderizaran

title: renderizaran


text: renderizarais

title: renderizarais


text: renderizad

title: renderizad


text: renderizaseis

title: renderizaseis


text: renderizábamos

title: renderizábamos


text: renderizare

title: renderizare


text: rendericés

title: rendericés


text: renderizaron

title: renderizaron


text: renderizaré

title: renderizaré


text: renderizaríais

title: renderizaríais


text: renderizaría

title: renderizaría


text: renderizaban

title: renderizaban


text: renderizaba

title: renderizaba


text: rendericé

title: rendericé


text: renderizabas

title: renderizabas


text: renderizaréis

title: renderizaréis


text: renderizáremos

title: renderizáremos


text: renderizarían

title: renderizarían


text: resintonizarás

title: resintonizarás


text: resintonizaras

title: resintonizaras


text: resintonizáremos

title: resintonizáremos


text: resintonizásemos

title: resintonizásemos


text: resintonicés

title: resintonicés


text: resintonizares

title: resintonizares


text: resintonizamos

title: resintonizamos


text: resintonizaban

title: resintonizaban


text: resintonizaren

title: resintonizaren


text: resintonizaremos

title: resintonizaremos


text: resintonizasteis

title: resintonizasteis


text: resintonizarán

title: resintonizarán


text: resintonicéis

title: resintonicéis


text: resintonizas

title: resintonizas


text: resintonizasen

title: resintonizasen


text: resintonizara

title: resintonizara


text: resintonizaran

title: resintonizaran


text: resintonizases

title: resintonizases


text: resintonizará

title: resintonizará


text: resintonizaron

title: resintonizaron


text: resintonizareis

title: resintonizareis


text: desacompasada

title: desacompasada


text: resintonizaría

title: resintonizaría


text: resintonizase

title: resintonizase


text: resintonizaré

title: resintonizaré


text: resintonicemos

title: resintonicemos


text: resintonizáramos

title: resintonizáramos


text: resintonizarais

title: resintonizarais


text: resintonice

title: resintonice


text:
Reconstruction:Proto-Finnic/maksadak

Etymology
From, possibly borrowed from (for the phonology, compare ).

Verb

 * 1) to cost
 * 2) to pay

Derived terms

 * *maksu ~ *makso

Descendants

 * North Karelian:
 * South Karelian:
 * Courland Livonian:
 * Vidzeme Livonian: /
 * North Karelian:
 * South Karelian:
 * Courland Livonian:
 * Vidzeme Livonian: /
 * Vidzeme Livonian: /

title: Reconstruction:Proto-Finnic/maksadak


text: resintonizaríamos

title: resintonizaríamos


text: resintonizare

title: resintonizare


text: resintonizás

title: resintonizás


text: resintonizarían

title: resintonizarían


text: resintonizáis

title: resintonizáis


text:
desacompasado

Adjective

 * 1) out of time

title: desacompasado


text: resintonizábamos

title: resintonizábamos


text: resintonizabais

title: resintonizabais


text: resintonizando

title: resintonizando


text: resintonizaste

title: resintonizaste


text: resintonizaréis

title: resintonizaréis


text: resintonizan

title: resintonizan


text: resintonizaríais

title: resintonizaríais


text: resintonizad

title: resintonizad


text: resintonizaba

title: resintonizaba


text: resintoniza

title: resintoniza


text: resintonizá

title: resintonizá


text: resintonicé

title: resintonicé


text: resintonizo

title: resintonizo


text: resintonizabas

title: resintonizabas


text: resintonizó

title: resintonizó


text: resintonizaseis

title: resintonizaseis


text: resintonicen

title: resintonicen


text: resintonizarías

title: resintonizarías


text: resintonices

title: resintonices


text: resintonizado

title: resintonizado


text: resintonizada

title: resintonizada


text: resintonizados

title: resintonizados


text: resintonizadas

title: resintonizadas


text: salinicés

title: salinicés


text: salinicéis

title: salinicéis


text: salinizarás

title: salinizarás


text: salinizaba

title: salinizaba


text: salinizares

title: salinizares


text: salinizarais

title: salinizarais


text: salinizarían

title: salinizarían


text: salinizaren

title: salinizaren


text: salinizaremos

title: salinizaremos


text: salinizaras

title: salinizaras


text: salinizasen

title: salinizasen


text: salinizábamos

title: salinizábamos


text: salinizases

title: salinizases


text: salinizaste

title: salinizaste


text: salinizasteis

title: salinizasteis


text: salinizarías

title: salinizarías


text: salinizaréis

title: salinizaréis


text: salinizarán

title: salinizarán


text: salinicemos

title: salinicemos


text: salinizareis

title: salinizareis


text: salinices

title: salinices


text: salinizáremos

title: salinizáremos


text: salinicen

title: salinicen


text: salinizáis

title: salinizáis


text: salinizaron

title: salinizaron


text: salinizara

title: salinizara


text: salinizaran

title: salinizaran


text: salinizaría

title: salinizaría


text: salinizáramos

title: salinizáramos


text: salinizabais

title: salinizabais


text: salinizásemos

title: salinizásemos


text: salinizamos

title: salinizamos


text: salinizaban

title: salinizaban


text: salinizase

title: salinizase


text: salinizabas

title: salinizabas


text: salinizaseis

title: salinizaseis


text: salinizaríamos

title: salinizaríamos


text: salinizaríais

title: salinizaríais


text: salinizá

title: salinizá


text: salinizan

title: salinizan


text: salinizad

title: salinizad


text: salinizo

title: salinizo


text: salinizas

title: salinizas


text:
salinizare

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) salinisation

title: salinizare


text: salinizará

title: salinizará


text: salinicé

title: salinicé


text: salinizó

title: salinizó


text: salinizando

title: salinizando


text: salinice

title: salinice


text: salinizaré

title: salinizaré


text: salinizás

title: salinizás


text: salinizado

title: salinizado


text: salinizada

title: salinizada


text: salinizados

title: salinizados


text: salinizadas

title: salinizadas


text: transfirás

title: transfirás


text: tonificaba

title: tonificaba


text: tonificaron

title: tonificaron


text: tonificad

title: tonificad


text: tonificares

title: tonificares


text: tonificarán

title: tonificarán


text: tonificarás

title: tonificarás


text: tonificaren

title: tonificaren


text: tonificaréis

title: tonificaréis


text: tonificarían

title: tonificarían


text: tonificas

title: tonificas


text: tonificasteis

title: tonificasteis


text: tonificases

title: tonificases


text: tonificaríais

title: tonificaríais


text: tonificara

title: tonificara


text: tonificábamos

title: tonificábamos


text: tonificá

title: tonificá


text: tonificarías

title: tonificarías


text: tonificasen

title: tonificasen


text: tonificáramos

title: tonificáramos


text: tonificaría

title: tonificaría


text: tonificamos

title: tonificamos


text: tonificarais

title: tonificarais


text: tonifiquéis

title: tonifiquéis


text: tonificáis

title: tonificáis


text: tonifiqués

title: tonifiqués


text: tonifiques

title: tonifiques


text: tonificaran

title: tonificaran


text: tonificaremos

title: tonificaremos


text: tonifiqué

title: tonifiqué


text: tonifiquen

title: tonifiquen


text: tonificase

title: tonificase


text: tonificaseis

title: tonificaseis


text: tonificaríamos

title: tonificaríamos


text: tonificabas

title: tonificabas


text: tonificaras

title: tonificaras


text: tonifican

title: tonifican


text: tonificásemos

title: tonificásemos


text: tonificareis

title: tonificareis


text: tonifiquemos

title: tonifiquemos


text: tonificáremos

title: tonificáremos


text: tonificabais

title: tonificabais


text: tonifique

title: tonifique


text: tonificó

title: tonificó


text: tonificará

title: tonificará


text: tonificaré

title: tonificaré


text: tonificás

title: tonificás


text: tonificaban

title: tonificaban


text: tonificado

title: tonificado


text: tonificada

title: tonificada


text: tonificados

title: tonificados


text: tonificadas

title: tonificadas


text: fachos

title: fachos


text:
User talk:DTLHS/spanish bot requests

acotiledóneo acromegálico absentista adunco lavadura oxítono cloquera

title: User talk:DTLHS/spanish bot requests


text:
Reconstruction:Proto-Finnic/naittadak

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to send off to be married

Descendants

 * North Karelian:
 * South Karelian:
 * North Karelian:
 * South Karelian:
 * North Karelian:
 * South Karelian:

title: Reconstruction:Proto-Finnic/naittadak


text:
tangerin

Etymology
From, after.

Noun

 * 1) a tangerine

title: tangerin


text:
اشتعل

Etymology
From the root related to fire.

Verb

 * 1)  to ignite, catch fire, flare up

title: اشتعل


text:
monjita

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) Any of several birds in the genus  in the tyrant flycatcher family.

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  bird
 * 1)  bird
 * 1)  bird

title: monjita


text:
cargadito

Etymology
From.

title: cargadito


text:
macrojuicio

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) huge trial, trial of the century

title: macrojuicio


text:
antisentimentalismo

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) antisentimalism

title: antisentimentalismo


text:
hidraste

Noun

 * 1)  goldenseal a herb,

title: hidraste


text:
Reconstruction:Proto-Finnic/paistadak

Etymology
Unclear. The word is likely a derivative, but two different analyses are possible:
 * from a root continued also in, , with the suffix . If this analysis is correct, the root is then likely to be a borrowing from Northwestern Germanic  (whence 🇨🇬), from , from.
 * from a root, possibly continued also in , with the suffix.

Verb

 * 1) to shine of the sun
 * 2)  to bake, to roast, to fry

Descendants

 * Livonian: ,
 * Livonian: ,
 * Livonian: ,
 * Livonian: ,
 * Livonian: ,

title: Reconstruction:Proto-Finnic/paistadak


text:
žampion

Etymology
(possibly through 🇨🇬)), which comes from, derived from , from . Compare , or.

Noun

 * 1) any mushroom of the genus, often a champignon  or a field mushroom

title: žampion


text:
densificar

Verb

 * 1) to densify

title: densificar


text:
recalificar

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to requalify
 * 2) to reassess (a building or zone)

title: recalificar


text: sincerarse

title: sincerarse


text:
field mushroom

Noun

 * 1) A commonly eaten mushroom,.

Translations

 * Czech: pečárka polní, žampion polní
 * Estonian: arušampinjon
 * Finnish:
 * French: ,
 * Hungarian: ,
 * Russian: шампиньо́н обыкнове́нный,
 * Scottish Gaelic: balg-bhuachair
 * Slovak: pečiarka poľná

title: field mushroom


text:
meadow mushroom

Noun

 * 1) A commonly eaten mushroom,.

title: meadow mushroom


text:
Reconstruction:Proto-Finnic/paladak

Etymology
From. Cognates include 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬. Has been compared earlier also with.

Verb

 * 1) to burn, to be burning

title: Reconstruction:Proto-Finnic/paladak


text:
žampión

Etymology
(possibly through 🇨🇬)), which comes from, derived from , from . Compare , or.

Noun

 * 1) any mushroom of the genus, often a champignon  or a field mushroom

title: žampión


text:
revalorar

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to revalue

title: revalorar


text:
recapturar

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to recapture, recatch

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to recapture, recatch

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to recapture, recatch

title: recapturar


text: imprimidas

title: imprimidas


text: imprimidos

title: imprimidos


text: imprimida

title: imprimida


text:
Theems

Proper noun

 * 1) Thames

title: Theems


text: Category:Norwegian Bokmål terms suffixed with -in


text:
Reconstruction:Proto-Finnic/salvadak

Etymology
Cognate with 🇨🇬 (which possibly borrowed from Finnic), whence 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1) to bite
 * 2) to notch (cut a notch into logs for joining)
 * 3)  to castrate

title: Reconstruction:Proto-Finnic/salvadak


text:
Taag

Etymology
From, from , , from , from.

Noun

 * 1) dough
 * 2) pastry
 * 3) batter

Etymology
From.

Proper noun

 * 1) Tagus

Etymology
From, from , , from , from. Compare 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1)  dough

title: Taag


text:
unha-de-gato

Noun

 * , cudweed common name given to various plants
 * 1) cat's claw, a medicinal plant of Brazil
 * 2) cat's claw, a tropical plant of South and Central America

title: unha-de-gato


text: 摸稜兩可

title: 摸稜兩可


text:
Reconstruction:Proto-Finnic/tappadak

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to kill, to slay
 * 2) to thresh
 * 1) to thresh

title: Reconstruction:Proto-Finnic/tappadak


text: αναλογίου

title: αναλογίου


text: αναλογίων

title: αναλογίων


text: αναλόγια

title: αναλόγια


text: tangerinen

title: tangerinen


text: tangeriner

title: tangeriner


text: αναλύτριας

title: αναλύτριας


text: αναλυτριών

title: αναλυτριών


text: αναλύτριες

title: αναλύτριες


text: tangerinene

title: tangerinene


text:
Reconstruction:Proto-Finnic/vaihtadak

Etymology
From, from , compare 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬 and 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1) to change

Descendants

 * / (with metathesis aih > ahe)

title: Reconstruction:Proto-Finnic/vaihtadak


text:
Reconstruction:Proto-Finnic/valadak

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to pour
 * 2) to cast

Descendants

 * North Karelian:
 * South Karelian:
 * North Karelian:
 * South Karelian:
 * North Karelian:
 * South Karelian:

title: Reconstruction:Proto-Finnic/valadak


text: Template:fi-conj-virkkaa

title: Template:fi-conj-virkkaa


text:
Template:fi-conj-virkkaa/documentation

See Finnish verb inflection-table templates.

title: Template:fi-conj-virkkaa/documentation


text:
armailli

Noun

 * 1)  shepherd (of the Fribourg region)

title: armailli


text:
કાકણ

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) A kind of leprosy that induces sharp pains. It is red in the center and black around the edge, likened to jequirity

title: કાકણ


text:
armatole

Etymology
Borrowed from, alternative form of , from (plural of , from , from , from , from ) +  (from , from , from ).

The plural form armatoloi and possibly armatoli are from the 🇨🇬 plural form.

Noun

 * 1)  A Greek armed mercenary who enforced Ottoman rule in Greece from the 15th century onward; during the  (1821–1832), many armatoloi became pro-independence guerrilla fighters opposed to Ottoman rule.

Translations

 * Czech: armatol
 * French:
 * Galician: armatol
 * Greek:
 * Macedonian: сердар
 * Portuguese: armatolo

Noun

 * 1) Armatole

title: armatole


text:
armeline

Noun

 * 1) a fine, white ermine from Lapland

title: armeline


text: Category:Norwegian Bokmål terms prefixed with zoo-


text: Category:Norwegian Nynorsk terms prefixed with zoo-


text:
armeur

Noun

 * 1) armourer

title: armeur


text:
geomathematics

Noun

 * 1)  The application of mathematics to the geosciences

Translations

 * Finnish: geomatematiikka
 * German: Geomathematik
 * Italian:
 * Polish: geo-matematyka

title: geomathematics


text:
geomathematical

Adjective

 * 1) Relating to geomathematics.

title: geomathematical


text:
agnotological

Adjective

 * 1) Relating to agnotology.

title: agnotological


text:
arminien

Adjective

 * 1) Arminian

Noun

 * 1) Arminian

title: arminien


text:
geomathematician

Noun

 * 1) One who studies geomathematics.

title: geomathematician


text: geomathematicians

title: geomathematicians


text:
geomathematically

Adverb

 * 1) By means of, or in terms of, geomathematics.

title: geomathematically


text:
કાકણક

Etymology
,, whence.

title: કાકણક


text: armoriaux

title: armoriaux


text: armoriales

title: armoriales


text:
犛牛

Noun

 * 1) yak

title: 犛牛


text:
arobe

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) at sign (@)

title: arobe


text: 𐌰𐌺𐍂

title: 𐌰𐌺𐍂


text:
pečárka lesní

Noun

 * 1)  species of fungi in the family

Hypernyms

 * – kingdom; – division;  – class;  – order;  – family;  – genus

title: pečárka lesní


text:
aroïdée

Noun

 * 1) arum (of subfamily )

title: aroïdée


text: 𐌰𐌺𐍂𐌰

title: 𐌰𐌺𐍂𐌰


text:
aromal

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) aromatic (fragrant)

title: aromal


text:
cryptoracism

Noun

 * 1) Racism that is kept concealed and unobvious.

title: cryptoracism


text:
cryptoracist

Adjective

 * 1) Secretly racist; not obviously racist.

Noun

 * 1) Somebody who keeps their racism secret.

title: cryptoracist


text: zoologene

title: zoologene


text:
aronde

Etymology
, from, from (cf. ), possibly a borrowing, according to the TLFi.

Noun

 * 1)  swallow (bird)

title: aronde


text: 𐌰𐍃𐍄𐍉𐍃

title: 𐌰𐍃𐍄𐍉𐍃


text: zoologar

title: zoologar


text: 𐌰𐍃𐍄𐌰𐌽𐍃

title: 𐌰𐍃𐍄𐌰𐌽𐍃


text: 𐌰𐍃𐍄𐌴

title: 𐌰𐍃𐍄𐌴


text: zoologane

title: zoologane


text:
ગણિત

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) mathematics

title: ગણિત


text: Category:gu:Mathematics

title: Category:gu:Mathematics


text:
સિધ્મ

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) A kind of leprosy where the skin becomes white and red and also becomes very thin. Rashes and scabs develop as well.

title: સિધ્મ


text:
User talk:WrongCentury95

Attestation of Gothic inflected forms
A while ago, romanized versions of all words found in texts were created as entries. So that means you shouldn't create any new ones, except if they are for lemmas. Since did not exist before, it is not found in Gothic texts and shouldn't have an entry. Can you please mark the unattested terms for deletion with the template? Thank you. —CodeCat 21:08, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Whoa, you didn't have to mark all the forms for deletion! Only the ones that you created a romanization entry for. The ones where a romanization entry already existed, are the forms that are attested, so those certainly should have a Gothic-script entry, too. —CodeCat 23:59, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
 * My apologies, I did not know that there was a system in place that allowed romanizations for only attested words. My intention was to add all inflections for the purpose of language study. Would it be beneficial to create inflected form entries for all words or only romanization and inflected form entries for attested words (or is there no need)? Thank you. WrongCentury95 (talk) 01:08, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Generally, for languages with little material, the practice is to show what exists rather than what might exist. So that means only the existing forms can have their own entry. We allow some leeway for lemma forms, which may not exist even if there are forms that do, but then it's generally possible to infer the inflection type and the lemma form from the other forms. For Gothic specifically, all attested forms have had romanization entries created for them by an automatic script. This means that if a romanization entry exists while a Gothic script entry does not, it's fine to create the Gothic script entry. But you should avoid creating new romanization entries, as well as Gothic entries where a romanization entry is not present. As I mentioned, an exception exists for lemmas: if the lemma form has no romanization entry (meaning it's not found in Gothic texts), you can create it. —CodeCat 01:29, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:WrongCentury95


text:
מיהו

Adverb

 * 1) however, but, nonetheless

Etymology
From.

Particle

 * 1) Who is ?
 * 2) * 2015 November 6, Barak Ravid, “מטען חבלה ושמו ברץ” (“A Bomb Named Baratz”), Haaretz online:
 * "he"

- בתחילה ניסו להבין מיהו אותו רן ברץ,

title: מיהו


text:
होमो सैपियन्स

Etymology
From.

Proper noun

 * 1) Homo sapiens the taxonomic name for anatomically modern humans

title: होमो सैपियन्स


text: Category:Hindi terms derived from New Latin


text:
Reconstruction:Proto-Finnic/hakëdak

Etymology
From earlier, borrowed from early (later ).

Verb

 * 1) to pick
 * 2) to fetch
 * 3) to gather, to collect

title: Reconstruction:Proto-Finnic/hakëdak


text:
peapini

Etymology
From, through a root. The Latin derives from. Compare 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) melon, watermelon

title: peapini


text:
Reconstruction:Proto-Finnic/iskedäk

Etymology
urj-fin-pro

Verb

 * 1) to hit, to strike
 * 2) to butcher, slaughter
 * 3) to ply (thread)

title: Reconstruction:Proto-Finnic/iskedäk


text:
fruktbarhet

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) fertility

Etymology
From. Compare 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) fertility, fecundity

title: fruktbarhet


text:
Reconstruction:Proto-Finnic/itkedäk

Etymology
.

Verb

 * 1) to cry, to weep

Descendants
From :

From :

title: Reconstruction:Proto-Finnic/itkedäk


text: 合火

title: 合火


text:
Reconstruction:Proto-Finnic/kickedäk

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to uproot, to weed

Descendants

 * / (from )
 * / (from )
 * (back vowel harmony)
 * / (from )
 * (back vowel harmony)
 * / (from )
 * (back vowel harmony)

title: Reconstruction:Proto-Finnic/kickedäk


text:
werewolfess

Noun

 * 1) A female werewolf.

title: werewolfess


text: werewolfesses

title: werewolfesses


text:
professoress

Noun

 * 1)  A female professor.

title: professoress


text: professoresses

title: professoresses


text: fruktbarheten

title: fruktbarheten


text: fruktbarheta

title: fruktbarheta


text:
fast-talker

Noun

 * 1)  A person who habitually speaks fast or rapidly.
 * 2)  A person who speaks rapidly in order to persuade, mislead or to manipulate others.
 * 3) A person whose job responsibilities include speaking very fast, for example an auctioneer.

title: fast-talker


text: fast-talkers

title: fast-talkers


text: forårsakes

title: forårsakes


text: naasłóóz

title: naasłóóz


text: nanilóóz

title: nanilóóz


text: neiidlóóz

title: neiidlóóz


text: naahłóóz

title: naahłóóz


text: 绿教

title: 绿教


text:
綠教

Noun

 * 1)  Islam

title: 綠教


text:
高麗參

Noun

 * 1) Korean ginseng
 * 2)  prepared steamed root of the white ginseng

title: 高麗參


text: 高麗蔘

title: 高麗蔘


text:
伊斯蘭國

Proper noun

 * 1) Islamic State

title: 伊斯蘭國


text: 伊斯兰国

title: 伊斯兰国


text:
non-committalness

Noun

 * 1)  the state of not willing to be committed

title: non-committalness


text:
tilpasning

Noun

 * 1) adaptation

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) adaptation

title: tilpasning


text:
宣戰

Verb

 * 1) to declare war

title: 宣戰


text: 宣战

title: 宣战


text:
Reconstruction:Proto-Uralic/kanta-

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to carry, to transport

Descendants

 * Enets:
 * Nenets:
 * Proto-Khanty: *kāntəm-
 * Proto-Mansi: *kūnt-
 * Nenets:
 * Proto-Khanty: *kāntəm-
 * Proto-Mansi: *kūnt-
 * Proto-Khanty: *kāntəm-
 * Proto-Mansi: *kūnt-
 * Proto-Khanty: *kāntəm-
 * Proto-Mansi: *kūnt-
 * Proto-Mansi: *kūnt-

title: Reconstruction:Proto-Uralic/kanta-


text: 扫射

title: 扫射


text:
סורי

Adjective

 * 1) Syrian: of, from, or pertaining to Syria.

title: סורי


text: tilpasninga

title: tilpasninga


text:
近期

Noun

 * 1) the near future; the short term

title: 近期


text: tilpasningen

title: tilpasningen


text: tilpasninger

title: tilpasninger


text: tilpasningene

title: tilpasningene


text:
테러

Etymology
From, compare Japanese.

Noun

 * 1) act of terrorism
 * 2) terrorism
 * 1) terrorism

title: 테러


text:
테러범

Etymology
From +.

Noun

 * 1) terrorist

title: 테러범


text:
Talk:high voltage sign

This is SoP in a way and seems to set a bad precedent. There are no-entry signs, give-way signs, men's toilets signs, all kinds of signs. The information is pictorial, not lexical. Equinox ◑ 23:30, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

RFD discussion: September–November 2017
I can’t see anything idiomatic in phrase that does not also apply to just, or that is linguistic rather than social/semiotic. Compare no entry sign, fire hazard sign, radioactive material sign, deer crossing sign. — Ungoliant (falai) 23:43, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

 * Delete. Equinox ◑ 23:49, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

 * Delete per nom. DCDuring (talk) 23:50, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

 * Delete. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 23:52, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

 * Delete. Perhaps more: search. Wyang (talk) 00:42, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

 * RFD failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 03:39, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:high voltage sign


text:
극단주의

Noun

 * 1) extremism

title: 극단주의


text:
드론

Etymology
Borrowed from.

Noun

 * 1) drone unmanned aerial vehicle

title: 드론


text:
여객기

Noun

 * 1) passenger airplane; airliner

title: 여객기


text:
microsoftien

Adjective

 * 1) Microsoftian

title: microsoftien


text: microsoftienne

title: microsoftienne


text: microsoftiennes

title: microsoftiennes


text: microsoftiens

title: microsoftiens


text: LOBs

title: LOBs


text:
이슬람국가

Etymology
From.

Proper noun

 * 1) Islamic State

title: 이슬람국가


text:
이슬람

Etymology
Ultimately from, probably via 🇨🇬.

Proper noun

 * 1) Islam

title: 이슬람


text:
집어넣다

Verb

 * 1) to put in, to throw in

title: 집어넣다


text:
nonseverance

Adjective

 * 1) Not relating to severance.

Noun

 * 1) Failure to sever something, such as the umbilical cord in a lotus birth.

title: nonseverance


text:
꼭대기

Etymology
From

Noun

 * 1) top, summit
 * 2) highest place; boss, chief

title: 꼭대기


text:
의심쩍다

Etymology
From +.

Verb

 * 1) to doubt, to question

title: 의심쩍다


text:
shenaniganry

Noun

 * 1)  Acts of shenanigans; incidents of trickery or mischievous play.

Alternative forms

 * shenaniganery

title: shenaniganry


text:
antiunionism

Etymology
or

Noun

 * 1) opposition to trade unions

title: antiunionism


text: ISAs

title: ISAs


text:
lotless

Adjective

 * 1) Without a lot, or plot of land.

title: lotless


text:
pneumatologically

Adverb

 * 1) In terms of, or by means of, pneumatology.

title: pneumatologically


text:
studerite

Noun

 * 1)  A varietal form of tennantite containing, as partial replacement of normal copper content, silver, lead, zinc, and iron.

title: studerite


text: tennantites

title: tennantites


text:
unipolarly

Adverb

 * 1) In a unipolar manner.

title: unipolarly


text:
polyadène

Etymology
From the, from the.

Adjective

 * 1)  polyadenous having many glands nodules

title: polyadène


text: zhānbǔ

title: zhānbǔ


text: polyadènes

title: polyadènes


text:
krijje

Etymology
From, northern variant of. Most closely related to 🇨🇬. Also cognate with 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1)  to get; to receive

Etymology
From, further etymology li.

Verb

 * 1)  to get, to receive, to come into possession of (anything ranging from concrete to abstract inputs such as news, gift, punishment, et cetera)
 * 2)  to get, to be presented with
 * 3)  to get, to (manage to) cause to become
 * 4)  to take

title: krijje


text:
mango pudding

Noun

 * 1) A pudding made with agar or gelatin, mango or mango essence, evaporated milk and sugar, of Indian origin, and commonly eaten in Southeast Asian countries.

Translations

 * Burmese: သရက်သီးပူတင်း
 * Chinese:
 * Cantonese: 芒果布甸, 芒果布丁
 * Mandarin: 芒果布丁, 芒果布甸
 * Danish:
 * Finnish: mangovanukas
 * French:
 * Portuguese:
 * Russian:
 * Spanish: pudin de mango

title: mango pudding


text: mango puddings

title: mango puddings


text:
芒果布甸

Noun

 * 1)  mango pudding

title: 芒果布甸


text:
Talk:diarrhea

RFV discussion: August–October 2015
Rfv-sense: The watery excrement that comes from said bowel movements. Seems dodgy to me. ---> Tooironic (talk) 11:56, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
 * As in "There's diarrhea all over the floor"? Sounds OK to me. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 11:58, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

 * I've added three quotations. —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 12:23, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Strikes me as distinct as well, "I've got diarrhea" refers to the condition not the excrement itself, right? Renard Migrant (talk) 14:32, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

 * This sense is widespread in the US and UK. A Google search for "covered in diarrhoea" gets 1200 hits on .uk sites. On the other hand, it gets only 160 on .au sites and 4 on .nz sites, whereas "covered in shit" gets 2000 .uk, 2500 .au, 900 .nz. Perhaps the presence/absence of the sense is a regional thing? - -sche (discuss) 18:19, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

 * Yes, I saw this earlier and the absence of what is perhaps just as common a sense, at least in my experience, was somewhat striking, but being as I am not an expert on diarrhea, I wasn't audacious enough to edit it. But watery, runny poop is definitely referred to as "diarrhea" around here (eastern US). Aperiarcam (talk) 18:47, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

 * My god, could it really be a regional thing? How bizarre. ---> Tooironic (talk) 06:59, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Are you saying that to you, diarrhea isn't both the medical condition and the feces that comes out during the condition? Which is it for you then, or another definition all together? Renard Migrant (talk) 17:34, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Apparently it's only the medical condition but not the feces that results. This isn't entirely surprising: I wouldn't say "there's dysentery all over the floor" to refer to the feces that results from the condition of dysentery. - -sche (discuss) 17:40, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

 * RFV-passed, and we learned something neat (that Aussies don't use the "feces" sense). - -sche (discuss) 17:40, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

 * Update: Tea room/2020/October. - -sche (discuss) 02:19, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Spelling
Why does it have an “o” on the main page but not the talk? 47.16.99.72 12:44, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

title: Talk:diarrhea


text:
Talk:Fashing

RFV discussion: September–November 2015
An alternative form of if it's citeable, I suppose? The entry hasn't been changed since an IP created it in 2012. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 05:29, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
 * A digraph SH was never part of any German orthography. A web search mainly brings up entries which are either plagued with typos/scannos or which have the normal spelling on them multiple times, making clear it's a typo. Should be deleted. Korn [kʰʊ̃ːæ̯̃n] (talk) 13:28, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

 * Yeah, RFV-failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 17:38, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

title: Talk:Fashing


text:
淡奶

Noun

 * 1) evaporated milk

title: 淡奶


text: 炼乳

title: 炼乳


text:
煉乳

Noun

 * 1) condensed milk

title: 煉乳


text: dànnǎi

title: dànnǎi


text: liànrǔ

title: liànrǔ


text: 炼奶

title: 炼奶


text:
煉奶

Noun

 * 1) condensed milk

title: 煉奶


text: liànnǎi

title: liànnǎi


text: mángguǒ bùdiàn

title: mángguǒ bùdiàn


text:
eckesch

Adverb

 * 1)  just; only

title: eckesch