text:
Talk:outcome

RFV discussion: August 2015–January 2016
Rfv-sense "A positive result or consequence."

I can't think of any circumstance where it would specifically mean a positive result ("poor outcome", "negative outcome" and "bad outcome" are all common colocations), but I'm ready to be surprised. Smurrayinchester (talk) 14:29, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I suppose if someone says "What an outcome!" that would imply a positive result. In fact I note result gives us a circular definition ("A positive or favourable outcome"). Not sure I agree with either def. Keith the Koala (talk) 16:35, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
 * "Result" meaning "positive outcome" I can see: you might say a doctor "tried various medicines to cure the patient, each time without result", when you mean each time the result was 'no change' (the medicine didn't cure the illness). I'm not familiar with "outcome" being used that way. - -sche (discuss) 18:37, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
 * In the UK, "result!" on its own implies a favorable outcome. It's informal, I'd use it like "I got her number before I left. Result!". Renard Migrant (talk) 14:26, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
 * As far as I know, 'positive' is not inherently part of the definition. There may be times when 'positive' can be assumed from the context, but that comes from the context (the sentence, paragraph or even several paragraphs) not the single word 'outcome'. Renard Migrant (talk) 17:32, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

 * RFV failed. —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 18:49, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:outcome


text:
Talk:Jelenator

RFV discussion: September 2015–January 2016
This only seems to exist on personal webpages, blogs, Facebook, and the like. Is this a hot word, or is it likely to evaporate as quickly as it's appeared? Chuck Entz (talk) 15:04, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
 * RFV-failed. If this were truly a hot word, I'd expect at least one durably archived cite to have turned up by the time of writing, but that hasn't been the case. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 04:57, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Talk:Jelenator


text:
Talk:laminarizator

RFV discussion: September 2015–January 2016
I could only find two uses of this word with this spelling. Oddly, is better attested, so it can be moved there if it fails. — Ungoliant (falai) 14:13, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

 * I've added three quotations, from a patent, a master's thesis, and an academic journal. I'm not sure whether the master's thesis is durably archived, though. —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 15:27, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Theses are considered acceptable as citations because universities generally retain printed copies of theses submitted by students. This was discussed here. -Cloudcuckoolander (talk) 20:09, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

 * RFV passed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 04:58, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:laminarizator


text:
Talk:dalangurong

RFV discussion: September 2015–January 2016
A word that smells strongly of tingo and has zero BGC hits? Hmm... —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 08:58, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

 * RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 00:49, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:dalangurong


text:
Talk:paranoidly

RFV discussion: August 2015–January 2016
"With regard to paranoia." Equinox ◑ 00:32, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
 * RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 07:30, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:paranoidly


text:
Talk:mola da grampola

RFV discussion: August 2015–January 2016
— Ungoliant (falai) 15:11, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 05:52, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:mola da grampola


text:
Talk:heina

RFV discussion: September 2015–January 2016
Supposedly Spanish meaning "hot chick" or something. Seems to be a nonce term. --Zo3rWer (talk) 08:09, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
 * RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 05:38, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:heina


text:
Talk:burimeo

RFV discussion: September 2015–January 2016
Esperanto. I can't find any uses on Google Books, Google Groups, or Tekstaro, and the word is not in any of the three Esperanto dictionaries I use. If it passes, the definition should probably be rephrased. —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 18:26, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
 * RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 05:37, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:burimeo


text:
Talk:Araneo-Viro

RFV discussion: September 2015–January 2016
Esperanto for Spider-Man. I can't find anything on Tekstaro, Google Books, or Google Groups. —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 20:39, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
 * As we don't have Spider-Man we shouldn't have this. I always thought fictional characters were banned unless they carry a meaning beyond their being fictional characters. --Hekaheka (talk) 00:08, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

 * RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 05:39, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:Araneo-Viro


text:
Talk:fessitude

RFV discussion: September 2015–January 2016
Only in dictionaries. DTLHS (talk) 04:07, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
 * It appears that Bailey was the author of a certain tome entitled An Universal Etymological English Dictionary, so Category:Requests for quotation/Bailey may contain other dictionary-only terms. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 04:22, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
 * It definitely does. We should probably try to cite all of them. DTLHS (talk) 04:32, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

 * English section should probably be a job. Although I believe there could be a valid French section. Ƿidsiþ 11:16, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
 * That awkward moment when you have often used a word that Wiktionary declares dictionary-only… — JohnC5
 * Since this is an obsolete word, it may be worthwhile to look for strings like fefsitude, feffitude, fe(situde and feßitude, because Google Book’s OCR system doesn’t read ſ properly. — Ungoliant (falai) 15:40, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I already did. Nothing came up. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 16:47, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

 * RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 05:43, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:fessitude


text:
Talk:vitaminergic

RFV discussion: September 2015–January 2016
I'll give this one the benefit of the doubt. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 03:20, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
 * It's totally wrong. For a start, it's an adjective, not a noun. The definition uses the word itself without any explanation. Also, it is from a user who repeatedly adds total rubbish. I would either just delete it or, even better, replace it with a proper adjectival definition. SemperBlotto (talk) 06:36, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I have converted the definition to an adjective. It seems to be rare, but used in a small number of related papers. SemperBlotto (talk) 09:50, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I added a second cite that is unrelated to that cluster of papers found by SemperBlotto. Kiwima (talk) 06:17, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
 * : I'm unclear on whether either of you found a third independent cite for this entry. If you did, could you please add it? —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 05:42, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Sorry, that second one was all I found other than the cluster around the one Ascorbic Acid paper. Kiwima (talk) 18:28, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

 * On Google Scholar, I can find quite a few works which state that ascorbic acid is a vitaminergic neurotransmitter, citing Karanth et al (the 2001 citation); I've added one to the entry. I suppose it's debatable whether they're independent of Karanth or not. I can also find this, which seems to be independent:
 * 2012, B. Beck, C. Bossenmeyer-Pourié, et al, Increased homocysteinemia is associated with beneficial effects on body weight after long-term high-protein, low-fat diet in rats, in Nutrition:
 * Because vitamin B12 and folate contents were the same in each diet and HP rats ate about the same quantity of diet in g/d (Table 2), the measured Hcy increase was not related to the vitaminergic composition itself, but rather to the availability of the ingested folate.
 * I suppose this is cited now. - -sche (discuss) 19:33, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you. For the record, I consider uses that cite Karanth et al. 2001 not to be independent from that paper, because it's common to use another group's terminology and not explicitly say "sensu Karanth et al." when you're just going to cite them at the end of the sentence anyway. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 19:46, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

 * RFV passed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 19:46, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:vitaminergic


text:
Talk:economical

RFV discussion: October 2015–January 2016
Rfv-sense: Relating to economy in any other sense. What does this actually refer to, specifically? I have no idea. ---> Tooironic (talk) 01:32, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

 * I've added four quotations. Maybe the sense would be more clearly phrased "Relating to an economy or economics." —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 03:49, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I'd consider that sense of economical to be archaic. It is no accident that the one cite from a native speaker is from 169 years ago and the other three are apparently from non-native speakers. DCDuring TALK 16:51, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Good point. I've added the label "archaic". —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 21:24, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Indeed. I've always thought "economic" could never mean "economical", but I suppose it might have originally at some point in time. ---> Tooironic (talk) 04:07, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

 * RFV-passed. - -sche (discuss) 09:33, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

 * I disagree with the specific label applied. Better would have been something like dated or uncommon.
 * The British National Corpus, for example, contains several instances in which "economical" is used in sense 3. For example:
 * "talks about moving forward as [he/she] states it in the economical situation the council is in."
 * "his attitude can not be blamed on his economical situation."
 * "not bad from an environmental, as well as economical point of view."
 * "the value of the soup from an economical point of view is also lost."
 * "In the original case that was put forward, the basis of the economical assessment and its traffic flows, was on the western relief road being the first"
 * "the effects of price, technical change and structural adjustment), the technological and economical assessment of alternative energy production systems, and the impact of new electronics related technologies"
 * These are generally from the 1980's and expressed by (British) native speakers of English. The surrounding text further illustrates that this is not 'archaic' usage.
 * —DIV (120.17.142.198 12:15, 26 September 2017 (UTC))

title: Talk:economical


text:
Talk:Back to the Future Day

RFV discussion: October 2015–January 2016
Meaning: "October 21, 2015." Really?

BTW, I've found a couple of random single-use alternative meanings:
 * 1) A day to celebrate past accomplishments.
 * 2) A day to relive 1955 life.

--Daniel Carrero (talk) 12:56, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Today is the day that they jumped forward to in the film. I don't think it deserves a dictionary entry though. SemperBlotto (talk) 13:07, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
 * is there any policy or guideline to support deletion of this? I doubt it. Pur ple back pack 89   13:12, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

 * See . I think that it’s okay to keep as a neologism or hot word. -- Romanophile ♞ (contributions) 13:09, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I think there are citations for it for 2014 and before. Consider this Google search set between January 1, 1985 and October 21, 2014. Pur ple back pack 89   13:12, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
 * (after edit conflict) I had deleted it as a Wonderfoolism. I can get it back if you think we need it. SemperBlotto (talk) 13:14, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Bad move to delete something in the middle of a discussion. I think you should recreate it and instead nominate it for deletion.  The CFI basis for deleting it is weak, particularly since there's not much in CFI about holidays and observances.  Also, being created by Wonderfool is not in and of itself a reason for deletion.Pur ple back pack 89   13:16, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

 * I hate to agree with Purplebackpack, but yes, I think that speedying it was a bad idea. This locution is definitely used by quite a few people. -- Romanophile ♞ (contributions) 13:19, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Restored. Would you like to give it a decent dictionary definition? SemperBlotto (talk) 13:20, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't see anything particularly wrong with the current definition; if I was changing it, I'd just move some of the words around in the current definition. Pur ple back pack 89  13:23, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I edited the definition. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 13:28, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
 * It could go to RFD though, since we don't have black cat appreciation day, world cat day and so on. Renard Migrant (talk) 17:55, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

 * RFV-passed as a hot word. I can see it potentially passing RFV if we check up on it in a year. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 07:04, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

RFV discussion: August 2017
Seems to have generated very short-lived buzz.__Gamren (talk) 09:42, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Yeah. WF created that page years ago. He's not gonna add 3 cites any time soon. --WF on Holiday (talk) 23:05, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

He may not, but there are sufficient cites on that page, and covering a timespan of three years. This one is cited. Kiwima (talk) 00:33, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Three years? It's a span of less than a year and a half (October 2015 to February 2017). —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 21:08, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
 * http://marquee.blogs.cnn.com/2010/07/06/not-back-to-the-future-day-yet/ is essentially talking about the same thing, isn't it? That's 7 years ago. W3ird N3rd (talk) 21:05, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Nonetheless, it is longer than the one year required. RFV-passed Kiwima (talk) 20:56, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:Back to the Future Day


text:
Talk:redheaded Eskimo

RFV discussion: October 2015–January 2016
- -sche (discuss) 02:42, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Looks legit to me, but with a hyphen: Kiwima (talk) 00:28, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Is it just a coincidence 2/3 of those are about Maryland? Maybe it's a regional term. though I guess that's so close to DC, any political terminology specific to MD would probably move to DC pretty quick. WurdSnatcher (talk)
 * I suspect that is no coincidence - Everything I found was Maryland or DC. My impulse would be to move the entry to a hyphenated version and mark it colloquial. Kiwima (talk) 19:34, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

 * RFV-passed, but moved to the hyphenated form (leaving a redirect, because why not). —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 06:39, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:redheaded Eskimo


text: normanda

title: normanda


text: Category:Byzantine Greek

title: Category:Byzantine Greek


text:
אַרײַנפֿיר

Etymology
Backformation from the verb, from ; at least in part, a loan translation of , itself of.

Noun

 * 1) introduction

title: אַרײַנפֿיר


text: rosegadors

title: rosegadors


text:
rosegador

Etymology
From. In the sense of "rodent", a.

Adjective

 * 1) nibbling, gnawing

Noun

 * 1) rodent

title: rosegador


text: Category:Italian terms derived from the Proto-Indo-European root *lewbʰ-


text:
פּסיכאָאַנאַליז

Noun

 * 1) psychoanalysis family of psychological theories

title: פּסיכאָאַנאַליז


text:
Talk:quedship

RFV discussion: November 2015–January 2016
, I can find no evidence of this word's existence. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 18:37, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
 * That was taken from A new English dictionary on historical principles : founded mainly on the materials collected by the Philological Society, which no longer has it up online, as I see...The word was a derivative under the headword of 'Qued', 'Quede' listing as Quedly adv. [ = OFris. qua(de]liki ] wickedly ; Quedness, Quedship, evil, wickedness. Leasnam (talk) 18:50, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
 * It is still here [] Leasnam (talk) 18:53, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
 * That's not really useful evidence; do you have anything relevant to RFV? —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 19:01, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
 * No. This is where I got the info when I created the entry. A review today will no doubt result in a deletion of the entry, which I do not contest, as it fails RFV Leasnam (talk) 19:22, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

 * RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 21:22, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:quedship


text:
Talk:vespertiĉo

RFV discussion: November 2015–January 2016
Esperanto for male bat. Nothing on Google Books, Google Groups, or Tekstaro. —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 21:37, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Esperanto is still a constructed language, with new words being invented by people over time as they need them, even though it is by far the most standardised conlang actually used. I would think Esperanto words belong if they make sense within the Esperanto construction frame, and vespertiĉo certainly seems to make sense. Conlangs are so different from natural languages in how they come about, my opinion would be to either not allow any conlangs or words of them on wiktionary, or to allow all of them, however there looks to be a massive double standard because any language that isn't "attested" by "verifiable sources" by "experts" will be labelled as a conlang and stigmatised and anyone who even question the dismissal of the language as a conlang will be accused of being the conlanger, as happened with all the Hunnic words added by except мори even though they're obviously some Turkic language, after which I was accused of being his sockpuppet because I asked if it's a nonstandard dialect of Bashkir that my friend speaks and insists it's a different language, not a dialect... The double standard is clear eurocentrism, it's a huge problem in linguistics; if it isn't "verified" by white people, then it doesn't exist... AliHautala (talk) 11:27, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

 * On Wiktionary, words in constructed languages have to meet the same criteria for inclusion as words in English, as explained in Criteria for Inclusion. This is not a double standard.
 * We do have a double standard with respect to small and poorly documented languages like Bashkir, but it's the opposite of what you're suggesting—words in poorly documented languages have fewer requirements for inclusion than words in well documented languages like English, French, or Esperanto. —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 15:28, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

 * RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 21:20, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:vespertiĉo


text: rosegadores

title: rosegadores


text: rosegadora

title: rosegadora


text: Category:yi:Psychology

title: Category:yi:Psychology


text: libiti

title: libiti


text:
PSPV

Etymology
.

title: PSPV


text:
Talk:silmähaudekuppi

RFV discussion: December 2015–January 2016
, if it's not used, we shouldn't be creating an entry for it. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 19:14, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Dunno, maybe we should have a category for dictionary-only terms, just in case somebody would want to check. This term happens to be quite wide-spread in the dictinary world, even Princeton has it. I thought we could/should do something to prevent someone from creating the entry by citing Princeton as evidence! --Hekaheka (talk) 22:55, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

 * We sometimes link to Appendix:Dictionary-only terms for these in English. Equinox ◑ 23:01, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

 * I see no reason not to create Appendix:Finnish dictionary-only terms even if it only has one entry. There's always a chance to add more. Renard Migrant (talk) 20:30, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

 * RFV failed and converted as suggested above. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 23:29, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

RFD discussion: January 2023
Finnish. A ghost word that only exists in WordNet, known for its ghost words. — S URJECTION / T / C / L / 17:51, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. I don't see any point in hosting an empty entry. Thadh (talk) 13:26, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
 * RFD-deleted — S URJECTION / T / C / L / 11:24, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:silmähaudekuppi


text:
Talk:komputilo

RFV discussion: December 2015–January 2016
Ido for computer. Removed by User:Algentem, with the edit summary "Deleted Ido, as 'komputilo' is not used in Ido. See komputero." —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 15:05, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Appears to be used occasionally by learners, although probably solely due to interference from Esperanto. In any case, nothing useful for attestation, so this is RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 03:32, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:komputilo


text:
Talk:mercenary

RFV discussion: January 2016
Rfv-sense:

A person employed to fight in an armed conflict who is not a member of the state or military group for which they are fighting and whose prime or sole motivation is private gain.

Tagged, but not listed. An IP and I have been going round in circles over this (see my talk page), and their newfound willingness to follow normal procedure rather than argue should be encouraged. This should be pretty easy to cite, right? Chuck Entz (talk) 15:09, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

 * Clearly widespread use... Equinox ◑ 15:41, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

 * I added a few cites, agree with widespread use. - TheDaveRoss 16:47, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

 * We shouldn't be listing here definitions tagged maliciously as it encourages people to make more malicious nominations. I would also remind you (all of you, I mean) that WT:BLOCK applies to editors who harm Wiktionary intentionally or unintentionally. There's a bit of debate when it comes to this editor whether they actually believe what they're saying or not. No matter, WT:BLOCK applies whether it's intentional or not. Renard Migrant (talk) 17:45, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Sometimes, in those rare times when I feel kind, I would have done something like restore the definition that had been undesirably altered and RfVed the new one, which almost certainly would die from citationlessness after a month or so. If that kindness were repaid by a malicious challenge of the restored sense, I would no longer have felt kind and indeed felt duped. I might then not feel kind again for some days. DCDuring TALK 22:19, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I consider this RFV passed and have removed the tag. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 22:48, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I consider this entry to have been inadequate, which was why it was easy for us to be embarrassed by a troll. We missed the evolution of the meaning of the term, probably because we never bothered to look at actual usage in print. DCDuring TALK 00:35, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

 * RFV passed as either clearly widespread use or with the use of attesting quotations present in mercenary. --Dan Polansky (talk) 09:58, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:mercenary


text:
Talk:तारेक्ष

RFV discussion: December 2015–January 2016
I added this about a month ago with a citation. I just came back to it after I saw it as FWOTD (\o/), and I realized that the citation is from Hindī viśvakośa - meaning Hindi encyclopedia. The Wikipedia article also has the exact same intro -

 * "तारेक्ष या तारक्षवेधयंत्र का पर्यायवाची अंग्रेजी शब्द ऐस्ट्रोलैब (Astrolabe) तथा संस्कृत शब्द 'यंत्रराज' है"
 * Astrolabe or (another word for astrolabe) has synonymy with the English word "astrolabe" and the Sanskrit word "यंत्रराज".

However, I can't find any other actual uses. Is it citable or some protologism?

—Aryamanarora (मुझसे बात करो) 00:08, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Well, certainly doesn't look promising., have you tried searching for inflected forms (like the plural)? —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 03:08, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Just did - exactly zero results, even in regular search. It appears to be a neologism invented by Hindi Wikipedians. —Aryamanarora (मुझसे बात करो) 03:37, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
 * You can't trust Wikipedias for these sorts of things — they make up words all the time. I wonder what the real word is, though, since appears not to be citable either — quite probably just an adapted version of the English word astrolabe. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 19:32, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I don't know much about Sanskrit, but looks like Hindi  + some Sanskrit root meaning sight + . I haven't had any luck finding the real word either. I'll be more careful fromm now on. —Aryamanarora (मुझसे बात करो) 19:35, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

 * RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 19:32, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:तारेक्ष


text:
פּסיכאָלאָג

Noun

 * 1) psychologist expert in the field of psychology

title: פּסיכאָלאָג


text:
Morella

Usage notes

 * Morella (Myricaceae) often included in, broadly defined.

Hyponyms

 * - type species; for other species see
 * - sole species

Etymology 1
Borrowed from.

Proper noun

 * 1) An ancient walled city in the province of Castellón, Valencia, Spain

Etymology 2
Borrowed from.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Morella is the 40371st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 542 individuals. Morella is most common among White (91.7%) individuals.

Etymology
Feminine form of.

title: Morella


text:
פּסיכאָאַנאַליטיקער

Noun

 * 1) psychoanalyst practitioner of psychoanalysis

title: פּסיכאָאַנאַליטיקער


text:
Talk:goaten

RFV discussion: January 2016
Having trouble finding this in Google Books. --WikiTiki89 19:31, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * The citations are on the page...you can do a search for part of the quote (e.g. "you have a goaten foot"; "reveals a goaten foot", etc) Leasnam (talk) 19:35, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Oh, my bad. --WikiTiki89 19:49, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

 * It does seem to have a narrower sense than "goatlike". Could it be used of meat, or of a smell, or only in poems about mythological characters? Might need gloss or usage notes. Equinox ◑ 00:06, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Yeah. I would even say it's more along the lines of "belonging to a goat", "of a goat", or ..."goatish" Leasnam (talk) 02:48, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

 * Glossed as poetic. Seem okay? Equinox ◑ 10:54, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Yah. Leasnam (talk) 10:57, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:goaten


text:
פּסיכע

Noun

 * 1) psyche the human soul, mind, or spirit

title: פּסיכע


text:
פּאַראַפּסיכאָלאָגיע

Noun

 * 1) parapsychology study of that which cannot yet be explained

title: פּאַראַפּסיכאָלאָגיע


text: Category:yi:Parapsychology

title: Category:yi:Parapsychology


text: Category:yi:Forteana

title: Category:yi:Forteana


text: Category:yi:Pseudoscience

title: Category:yi:Pseudoscience


text:
User:TI-691738

Hello! I'm a new user.

title: User:TI-691738


text: videobandje

title: videobandje


text: videobandjes

title: videobandjes


text:
Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2015-12/EL introduction/diff

Page blanked because it has a policy template and I didn't want it to be categorized in Category:Wiktionary policies. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 18:00, 31 January 2016 (UTC)


text:
sapone di Marsiglia

Noun

 * 1) Marseille soap

title: sapone di Marsiglia


text: saponi di Marsiglia

title: saponi di Marsiglia


text:
acceptació

Noun

 * 1) acceptance

title: acceptació


text: acceptacions

title: acceptacions


text:
autoband

Etymology
Compound of.

Noun

 * 1) / (e.g. a car tyre)

title: autoband


text: autobanden

title: autobanden


text: autobandje

title: autobandje


text: autobandjes

title: autobandjes


text:
povârni

Etymology
From a language; cf. 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1) to slant, slope

title: povârni


text:
povârniș

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) slope, slant
 * 2) ramp

title: povârniș


text: hachured

title: hachured


text: hachuring

title: hachuring


text:
einschneien

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to be snowed in
 * 2)  to snow in
 * 1)  to snow in

title: einschneien


text: haftara

title: haftara


text: haftaras

title: haftaras


text: haftorah

title: haftorah


text: haftoroth

title: haftoroth


text: haftorahs

title: haftorahs


text: haftorot

title: haftorot


text: hackbush

title: hackbush


text: hagbush

title: hagbush


text: hackbut

title: hackbut


text:
मुद्दा

Etymology
Probably borrowed from, from , from the root. Compare 🇨🇬 /, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) subject, topic
 * 2) object the topic under discussion
 * 3) issue, matter, problem
 * 1) issue, matter, problem

Etymology
Probably borrowed from, from , from the root. Compare 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬 /, 🇨🇬 /

Noun

 * 1) point the topic of discussion, the main idea
 * 2) clause

title: मुद्दा


text: hagbushes

title: hagbushes


text: hackbushes

title: hackbushes


text: hackbuts

title: hackbuts


text: मुद्दआ

title: मुद्दआ


text:
User talk:TI-691738

Welcome!

Hello, welcome to Wiktionary, and thank you for your contributions so far.

If you are unfamiliar with wiki editing, take a look at Help:How to edit a page. It is a concise list of technical guidelines to the wiki format we use here: how to, for example, make text boldfaced or create hyperlinks. Feel free to practice in the sandbox. If you would like a slower introduction we have a short tutorial.

These links may help you familiarize yourself with Wiktionary:

 * Entry layout (EL) is a detailed policy documenting how Wiktionary pages should be formatted. All entries should conform to this standard. The easiest way to start off is to copy the contents of an existing page for a similar word, and then adapt it to fit the entry you are creating.
 * Our Criteria for inclusion (CFI) define exactly which words can be added to Wiktionary, though it may be a bit technical and longwinded. The most important part is that Wiktionary only accepts words that have been in somewhat widespread use over the course of at least a year, and citations that demonstrate usage can be asked for when there is doubt.
 * If you already have some experience with editing our sister project Wikipedia, then you may find our guide for Wikipedia users useful.
 * The FAQ aims to answer most of your remaining questions, and there are several help pages that you can browse for more information.
 * A glossary of our technical jargon, and some hints for dealing with the more common communication issues.
 * If you have anything to ask about or suggest, we have several discussion rooms. Feel free to ask any other editors in person if you have any problems or question, by posting a message on their talk page.

You are encouraged to add a BabelBox to your userpage. This shows which languages you know, so other editors know which languages you'll be working on, and what they can ask you for help with.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wiktionarian! If you have any questions, bring them to the Information desk, or ask me on my talk page. If you do so, please sign your posts with four tildes: ~ which automatically produces your username and the current date and time.

Again, welcome! —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 18:19, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

title: User talk:TI-691738


text:
Talk:hae

Scots
Another Scots past tense is haed. Not sure how to add it. Equinox ◑ 18:21, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Hawaiian
Can it also mean "wild, fierce, vicious, furious, savage" in Hawaiian? 173.88.246.138 03:40, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

title: Talk:hae


text:
मसला

Etymology
, from.

Noun

 * 1) issue, matter

title: मसला


text: cheider

title: cheider


text: cheyders

title: cheyders


text: cheiders

title: cheiders


text: hagdown

title: hagdown


text: haglin

title: haglin


text: hagdowns

title: hagdowns


text: haglins

title: haglins


text: Atheisten

title: Atheisten


text: Atheistinnen

title: Atheistinnen


text:
haircap

Noun

 * 1) Any of various mosses of the family.

title: haircap


text:
polytrichaceous

Adjective

 * 1) Of or relating to the moss family.

title: polytrichaceous


text: haircaps

title: haircaps


text:
User:Clockchime

I am interested in sophron & praxis.

title: User:Clockchime


text:
aljurea

Etymology
Probably from, (a variant of ) + +. Compare Romanian aiurea, French ailleurs.

Adverb

 * 1) elsewhere, anywhere else
 * 2) nowhere

title: aljurea


text:
hairwork

Noun

 * 1) Jewellery made from human hair.
 * 2) The process of making jewellery from human hair.
 * 1) The process of making jewellery from human hair.

title: hairwork


text: hairworks

title: hairworks


text:
hakam

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  An arbitrator.

Etymology
, from.

Noun

 * 1)  arbitrator.

title: hakam


text: hakams

title: hakams


text:
aiura

Etymology
From. Compare 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1)  to be delirious; to drivel; to rave

title: aiura


text:
योगदान

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) contribution, role

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) contribution

title: योगदान


text: cold traps

title: cold traps


text: halakhoth

title: halakhoth


text: halakhos

title: halakhos


text:
aljuredz

Etymology
From. Compare 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1) to be delirious; talk nonsense, drivel

title: aljuredz


text:
halotolerance

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) The quality or degree of being halotolerant.

title: halotolerance


text: halotolerances

title: halotolerances


text:
halophily

Noun

 * 1)  The ability to live and thrive in an environment of high salinity.

title: halophily


text: halutzim

title: halutzim


text:
halutz

Etymology
Borrowed from.

Noun

 * 1)  A pioneer, especially one of the early Jewish immigrants to Palestine.

title: halutz


text:
hamewith

Adverb

 * 1) homeward

title: hamewith


text: hangaring

title: hangaring


text:
hangared

Adjective

 * 1) Having a specified number or kind of hangars.

title: hangared


text: haphtara

title: haphtara


text: haphtaras

title: haphtaras


text:
handworker

Noun

 * 1) One who carries out handwork, working by hand rather than using a machine.

title: handworker


text: handworkers

title: handworkers


text: harambees

title: harambees


text: hardiheads

title: hardiheads


text: hardihoods

title: hardihoods


text:
hardgrass

Noun

 * 1) Any of the genus  of Eurasian and North African plants in the grass family.

title: hardgrass


text: hardgrasses

title: hardgrasses


text:
piduz'

Etymology
From, from.

Noun

 * 1) length
 * 2) longitude
 * 3) duration

title: piduz'


text:
複占

Noun

 * 1) duopoly

title: 複占


text:
ふくせん

Noun

 * 1)  duopoly
 * 1)  duopoly

title: ふくせん


text: fukusen

title: fukusen


text: hashmark

title: hashmark


text: hashmarks

title: hashmarks


text:
hassocky

Adjective

 * 1) Having or characterised by hassocks, or clumps of vegetation.

title: hassocky


text:
User talk:Dr Bilal Alshareef

Hippocrates is stressed on the second syllable so it has a three-syllable rhyme. Equinox ◑ 18:56, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Welcome
Chuck Entz (talk) 05:35, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

--Lo Ximiendo (talk) 02:22, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

title: User talk:Dr Bilal Alshareef


text:
pideta

Etymology 1
From.

Verb

 * 1) to lengthen, to become longer

Etymology 2
From.

Verb

 * 1) to lengthen, to make longer

title: pideta


text:
avredz

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to make cool, refreshed

title: avredz


text: haulyard

title: haulyard


text: haulyards

title: haulyards


text:
avros

Adjective

 * 1) fresh, cool, cooling, refreshing

title: avros


text:
hawkit

Adjective

 * 1) Of cattle: having a white face, or white spots or streaks.

title: hawkit


text:
avritsã

Noun

 * 1) fan

title: avritsã


text:
haybox

Noun

 * 1) A chest insulated with a layer of hay or another insulant, formerly used to keep food hot.

title: haybox


text: hayboxes

title: hayboxes


text:
aerã

Etymology
This form probably from or perhaps ; other variant forms more likely from 🇨🇬. Compare 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) air

title: aerã


text: Category:Italian terms derived from the Proto-Indo-European root *peḱu-


text: Category:Terms derived from the Proto-Indo-European root *peḱu-


text:
umbalite

Etymology
Named for the of the  of, the location of the mineral’s first discovery in 1978:.

Noun

 * 1)  A variety of  consisting of a mixture of, , and , having the chemical formula Mg₃Al₂(SiO₄)₃-Mn²⁺₃Al₂(SiO₄)₃, exclusively found in the  deposits of the River Umba, and having a light-pink to purple colour.
 * 2)  A  consisting of the  umbalite.

Translations

 * Swahili:

 * Swahili:

title: umbalite


text:
hecogenin

Noun

 * 1) An organic compound obtained from the sisal plant and used in the production of steroidal drugs.

Derived terms

 * neohecogenin

title: hecogenin


text: hecogenins

title: hecogenins


text:
hederal

Etymology
From or, from Latin.

Adjective

 * Of, relating to, or composed of ivy.
 * , , Volume 116, page 368,
 * Unsightly places may be hidden from view by hederal screens,.

title: hederal


text:
hectorism

Noun

 * 1) swagger; bravado

title: hectorism


text:
heediness

Noun

 * 1)  The quality of being heedy.

title: heediness


text:
hegari

Noun

 * 1) A kind of sorghum used as animal feed.

title: hegari


text: hegaris

title: hegaris


text: heiled

title: heiled


text: heiling

title: heiling


text:
airisescu

Etymology
From. Compare 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1) to air, aerate, refresh

title: airisescu


text: Reconstruction:Proto-Germanic/alþizô

title: Reconstruction:Proto-Germanic/alþizô


text:
heishe

Etymology
Variously said to be from a word for "white shell", "shell", or "shell bead" in.

Noun

 * 1) Small disc- or tube-shaped beads made from shells or stones, primarily associated with the.

title: heishe


text:
parahim

Etymology
Related to Finnish and.

title: parahim


text:
hellicat

Noun

 * 1) hellcat

Adjective

 * 1) giddy-headed; flighty

title: hellicat


text: hellicats

title: hellicats


text: hematines

title: hematines


text:
pidemb

Etymology
Related to Finnish.

title: pidemb


text: heppest

title: heppest


text: heroins

title: heroins


text: Category:Dutch terms derived from Egyptian


text:
kaikiš

Particle

 * 1) most;

title: kaikiš


text: Category:Dutch terms derived from Egyptian languages


text:
syssitia

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  In Ancient Greece, a common meal shared by men and youths in social or religious groups.

title: syssitia


text: syssitias

title: syssitias


text:
heterogonic

Adjective

 * 1)  Characterized by heterogony
 * 2)  Describing a parasite whose life cycle is alternated with that of free-living generation

Antonyms

 * homogonic

title: heterogonic


text:
bãrbirisescu

Etymology
From,.

Verb

 * 1) to shave, barber, cut or clip hair

title: bãrbirisescu


text: heteroploids

title: heteroploids


text: hewings

title: hewings


text:
bãrbutã

Etymology
From or possibly derived from a  root, from  (cf. Italian , French , Spanish ).

Noun

 * 1) head of a leek, including its roots

title: bãrbutã


text:
hexerei

Noun

 * 1)  A galley with six banks of oars.

Etymology 2
.

Noun

 * 1) witchcraft

title: hexerei


text: hexereis

title: hexereis


text: heydey

title: heydey


text: heydeys

title: heydeys


text:
hielaman

Noun

 * 1) An Australian Aboriginal shield, traditionally made from bark or wood.

title: hielaman


text: hielamans

title: hielamans


text: primaia

title: primaia


text: primaie

title: primaie


text: higglings

title: higglings


text:
prash

Etymology
Probably from (compare 🇨🇬, also 🇨🇬).

Noun

 * 1) leek

title: prash


text: hillos

title: hillos


text:
cystospore

Noun

 * 1) A zoospore within a cyst of a chytrid

title: cystospore


text: cystospores

title: cystospores


text:
hippic

Etymology

+ English. Ἱππικός is derived from (ultimately from, probably from ) +.

Adjective

 * 1) Relating to horses or horse-riding.
 * 2)  Relating to horse racing.
 * 1)  Relating to horse racing.
 * 1)  Relating to horse racing.

Translations

 * French: ,
 * Polish:

title: hippic


text: hirling

title: hirling


text: hirlings

title: hirlings


text:
deglutamylation

Noun

 * 1) The removal of glutamyl groups

title: deglutamylation


text:
hispidity

Noun

 * 1) The quality of being hispid.

title: hispidity


text: hispidities

title: hispidities


text:
sensitiv

Etymology
.

Adjective

 * 1) sensitive

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) sensitive

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) sensitive

title: sensitiv


text:
depolyglutamylation

Noun

 * 1) The removal of single glutamate residues from polyglutamate groups

title: depolyglutamylation


text:
hoghood

Noun

 * 1) The state of being a hog, or pig.

title: hoghood


text: holographed

title: holographed


text: holographing

title: holographing


text:
holographer

Noun

 * 1) One who creates holograms.

title: holographer


text: holographers

title: holographers


text:
endodormancy

Noun

 * 1)  dormancy brought about by internal (rather than environmental) factors

Related terms

 * endodormant

title: endodormancy


text: holings

title: holings


text:
disfingu

Etymology
Related to or derived from (with the prefix ), itself from, with a prefix added. Possibly corresponds to a form.

Verb

 * 1) to cut the leavened dough in small pieces with the desired form to make loaves of bread

title: disfingu


text:
exocytotoxic

Adjective

 * 1) cytotoxic outside of the cell that produced the cytotoxin

title: exocytotoxic


text: homousian

title: homousian


text: homousians

title: homousians


text:
fibrinosuppurative

Adjective

 * 1) That is suppurative and contains fibrin

title: fibrinosuppurative


text:
heptamerization

Noun

 * 1) The formation of heptamers

title: heptamerization


text:
homeorhetic

Adjective

 * 1) Relating to homeorhesis

title: homeorhetic


text:
hoodedness

Noun

 * 1) The quality of being hooded.

title: hoodedness


text: hoodooism

title: hoodooism


text: hoodooisms

title: hoodooisms


text:
disfimtã

Verb

 * 1)  (invariant form used with "to have" in verb constructions)

Adjective

 * 1)  ( used as an adjective)

title: disfimtã


text: immunoabsorbant

title: immunoabsorbant


text:
pitte

Etymology
From. Compare 🇨🇬.

Interjection

 * 1)  please

Etymology
From. Compare 🇨🇬.

Adverb

 * 1) please

title: pitte


text:
immunofluorimetric

Adjective

 * 1) Relating to immunofluorimetry

title: immunofluorimetric


text: ⴾⵍ

title: ⴾⵍ


text:
disfimtu

Etymology
Past participle of. Corresponds to a (instead of ) with the prefix  (cf. Italian, French ).

Adjective
(feminine disfimtã)

 * 1)  cut in small pieces

title: disfimtu


text: hoofrot

title: hoofrot


text:
interlobate

Adjective

 * 1) Between lobes

title: interlobate


text:
pystyakseli

Noun

 * 1)  vertical axis

title: pystyakseli


text:
cãstãnjiu

Etymology 1
From or.

Noun

 * 1) chestnut tree

Etymology 2
From the above, with the suffix. Cf. also Romanian.

Adjective

 * 1) chestnut-brown colored

title: cãstãnjiu


text:
Mordrec

Etymology
, from.

Proper noun

 * 1)  Mordred

title: Mordrec


text:
intraneocortical

Adjective

 * 1) Within the neocortex

title: intraneocortical


text:
hopsacking

Noun

 * 1) hopsack fabric

title: hopsacking


text: hopsackings

title: hopsackings


text:
hornlet

Noun

 * 1) A little horn.

title: hornlet


text: hornlets

title: hornlets


text:
horsewhipper

Noun

 * 1) One who horsewhips.

title: horsewhipper


text: horsewhippers

title: horsewhippers


text: intraperitonially

title: intraperitonially


text:
horsepox

Noun

 * 1) A disease of horses caused by an orthopoxvirus.

title: horsepox


text: hosannaed

title: hosannaed


text: hosannaing

title: hosannaing


text: leiomyoblastoma

title: leiomyoblastoma


text:
hotdogger

Noun

 * 1) One who hotdogs; a sporting show-off.

Translations

 * Finnish:

title: hotdogger


text: hotdoggers

title: hotdoggers


text:
micellarized

Adjective

 * 1) Converted into micelles

title: micellarized


text:
Houdan

Noun

 * 1) A domestic chicken of an old French breed, having an unusual butterfly-shaped comb and five toes rather than the usual four.

Proper noun

 * 1) A commune in Yvelines, France.

title: Houdan


text: Houdans

title: Houdans


text:
midzonal

Adjective

 * 1) Relating to a midzone

title: midzonal


text:
howtowdie

Noun

 * 1) A dish of roast chicken stuffed with oats.

title: howtowdie


text: howtowdies

title: howtowdies


text:
oomycide

Noun

 * 1) Any substance that kills oomycetes.

title: oomycide


text:
huffkin

Noun

 * 1) A Kentish bread roll with a distinctive dimple in the middle.

title: huffkin


text: huffkins

title: huffkins


text: oomycides

title: oomycides


text: humectives

title: humectives


text: hushabied

title: hushabied


text: fregida

title: fregida


text: hushabies

title: hushabies


text: fregits

title: fregits


text: hushabying

title: hushabying


text: fregides

title: fregides


text:
pystysuuntainen

Adjective

 * 1) vertical

title: pystysuuntainen


text:
oxathiapiprolin

Noun

 * 1) A fungicide containing oxazole, pyrazole and thiazole groups

title: oxathiapiprolin


text: hydrocephalics

title: hydrocephalics


text:
hydroski

Noun

 * 1) A ski allowing a seaplane to land on water.

title: hydroski


text: hydroskis

title: hydroskis


text:
hydyne

Noun

 * 1) A mixture of unsymmetrical dimethylhydrazine and diethylenetriamine used as rocket fuel.

title: hydyne


text:
parbendazole

Noun

 * 1) The benzimidazole anthelmintic methyl N-(6-butyl-1H-benzimidazol-2-yl)carbamate

title: parbendazole


text:
jordnära

Etymology
From, used in 1942, but not included in SAOB's article "jord" written in 1934; in the astronomic sense cognate with 🇨🇬.

Adjective

 * 1) down-to-earth, concrete, pragmatic, realistic, plain, common; of people, ideas and presentations
 * 2)  earth (colours, tone); of colours related to earth pigments (ochre, sienna, umber)
 * 3)  near-Earth; of asteroids

Declension
No declension.

title: jordnära


text:
caboce

Etymology
From the pejorative prefix +, which is disputed:
 * Possibly a formation from, but the medial p would have lenited to v.
 * From, a borrowing, from , from , from , from

Noun

 * 1)  head

title: caboce


text:
hygrophytic

Adjective

 * 1) Of or relating to hygrophytes.

title: hygrophytic


text: hymnologies

title: hymnologies


text:
hyperproducer

Etymology
or

Noun

 * 1) That which hyperproduces.

title: hyperproducer


text: hyperproducers

title: hyperproducers


text:
polyglutamylate

Verb

 * 1) To undergo polyglutamylation

title: polyglutamylate


text: polyglutamylated

title: polyglutamylated


text:
روج

Verb

 * 1) to circulate, to sling, to propagate, to pitch, to promote

Etymology 1
From.

Verb

 * 1) to circulate, to propagate, to promote
 * 2) to sell drugs

Etymology 2
From, from.

Noun

 * 1) lipstick
 * 2) lip gloss

Etymology
From, from.

Noun

 * 1) wine

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to promote
 * 2) to circulate, to propagate

title: روج


text: Category:Icelandic class 1 strong verbs

title: Category:Icelandic class 1 strong verbs


text: polyglutamylating

title: polyglutamylating


text: Category:Icelandic class 2 strong verbs

title: Category:Icelandic class 2 strong verbs


text: Category:Icelandic class 3 strong verbs

title: Category:Icelandic class 3 strong verbs


text: Category:Icelandic class 5 strong verbs

title: Category:Icelandic class 5 strong verbs


text:
Reconstruction:Proto-Finnic/ahtas

Etymology
From earlier, borrowed from (compare 🇨🇬), from.

Adjective

 * 1) narrow, cramped

Descendants

 * North Karelian:
 * South Karelian:
 * North Karelian:
 * South Karelian:
 * North Karelian:
 * South Karelian:

title: Reconstruction:Proto-Finnic/ahtas


text:
prototoxin

Noun

 * 1) Any substance that is converted into a toxin

title: prototoxin


text: ⴷⵔⵔ

title: ⴷⵔⵔ


text:
reacetylation

Noun

 * 1) acetylation following a previous deacetylation

title: reacetylation


text:
regranulation

Noun

 * 1) granulation following a previous degranulation

title: regranulation


text:
splitomicin

Noun

 * 1) The biochemically active lactone 1,2-dihydro-3H-naphtho[2,1-b]pyran-3-one

title: splitomicin


text:
uncongressed

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1)  unaligned

title: uncongressed


text:
เยอรมนี

Etymology
.

title: เยอรมนี


title: User:Bigbossfarin/Template:is-conj-s4


text: bochu

title: bochu


text:
RSL

Noun

 * 1)  a Returned and Services League of Australia location
 * 1)  a Returned and Services League of Australia location
 * 1)  a Returned and Services League of Australia location
 * 1)  a Returned and Services League of Australia location

title: RSL


text:
repubblica delle banane

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1)  banana republic

title: repubblica delle banane


text:
مكياج

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) makeup; make-up

Etymology
From, from.

Noun

 * 1) cosmetics
 * 2) makeup; make-up

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) makeup

title: مكياج


text:
足早

Etymology
Compound of.

Adjective

 * 1) brisk, swift-footed, fast-paced

Noun

 * 1) briskness, swift-footedness, fast-pacedness

title: 足早


text: あしばや

title: あしばや


text: ashibaya

title: ashibaya


text:
Namibisch

Adjective

 * 1) Namibian

title: Namibisch


text: repubbliche delle banane

title: repubbliche delle banane


text:
بسرعة

Etymology
.

Adverb

 * 1) faster
 * 2) quickly

Etymology
.

Adverb

 * 1) quickly, at a fast pace

title: بسرعة


text: Category:de:Echinoderms

title: Category:de:Echinoderms


text: Seeigels

title: Seeigels


text:
Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2016-01/Pronunciation

Pronunciation
Voting on: Editing WT:EL.

See diff.

Current text:
 * Pronunciation
 * Main article: Pronunciation

A typical pronunciation section may look like the following example based on the word portmanteau:

The region or accent [,, , et al.] is first if there is regional variation, followed by the pronunciation system (such as enPR or IPA), a colon, then the pronunciation. (See Wiktionary:Pronunciation key for an outline of these two systems.) The phonetic transcriptions are normally placed between diagonal strokes. Use an established system of pronunciation transcription, such as IPA.

Ideally, every entry should have a pronunciation section, and perhaps a sound sample to accompany it. However, pronunciations vary widely between dialects, and non-linguists often have trouble writing down pronunciations properly.

For audio pronunciations, upload the Ogg file to Commons and link here using Template:audio.

List any homophones of the word in alphabetical order, wikifying each one. For example, the Pronunciation section of the English word contains the line
 * Homophones (subsection)

which results in

 * Homophones: rite, wright, write

which are the English words that sound identical to.

If a word is a homophone in a particular dialect, it may be added provided the dialect is referred to (for example, is a homophone of  in accents with flapping, and  is a homophone of  in non-rhotic accents). Examples (for and, respectively):

 * Homophones: beta
 * Homophones: rite, wright, write, ride

The following must not be added to the homophones section:

 * Words that are “nearly” homophones or rhymes (for example, for, the words or );
 * Words that are homophones if they are mispronounced in some way (e.g. for, the word when pronounced with a lisp);
 * Words from other languages (which are unlikely to be true homophones anyway).

(Note that the term used here is ; the term used by some is ambiguous as it can mean either “homophone” or “homograph”.)

Add a link to the page in the “Rhymes” namespace that lists the rhymes for the word. So, for example, on the entry for, add the line
 * Rhymes (subsection)

to the code. This displays as

To see the usage instructions for, see Template:rhymes/documentation.

Do not list the rhymes themselves in the main namespace.

 * References

Proposed text:

Note: The example word is for illustrative purposes only, and shall be replaced by the word that is chosen in the informal poll Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2016-01/Pronunciation.

 * Pronunciation
 * Main article: Pronunciation

Ideally, every entry should have a pronunciation section, with the phonetic transcription and usually including an audio file. Note that pronunciations may vary widely between dialects, and non-linguists often have trouble writing down pronunciations properly.

A typical pronunciation section may look like the following (simplified) example based on the word :

Code:

Result:

Notes:
 * The region or accent [,, , et al.] is first if there is regional variation, followed by the pronunciation system (such as enPR or IPA), a colon, then the pronunciation. (See Wiktionary:Pronunciation key for an outline of these two systems.) The phonetic transcriptions are normally placed between diagonal strokes. Use an established system of pronunciation transcription, such as IPA.
 * For audio pronunciations, upload the Ogg file to Commons and link here using Template:audio.
 * Rhymes are listed in the "Rhymes" namespace; do not list rhymes in the main namespace. Instead, in each entry, add a link to the respective rhymes page. See for usage instructions.
 * Homophones are words in the same language that have the same sound. (Avoid using the ambiguous term, as it can mean either or .) Don't add: 1) words that are “nearly” homophones or rhymes (for example, for , the words  or ); 2) words that are homophones if they are mispronounced in some way (e.g. for , the word  when pronounced with a lisp); 3) words from other languages (which are unlikely to be true homophones anyway). Homophones should be listed in alphabetical order using the  template. If a word is a homophone in a particular dialect, it may be added provided the dialect is referred to (for example,  is a homophone of  in accents with flapping, and  is a homophone of  in non-rhotic accents).
 * Use the template for hyphenations.

 * References

Changes and rationale:
 * More compact version of the same policy. No rules were intended to be changed, they are just described in a way that takes up less space.
 * Using a bulleted list to organize the ideas. The order of ideas changes in a few places.
 * The subsections (Homophones and Rhymes) were removed. The same information was kept, albeit in the bulleted list.
 * The current text uses 4 entries as examples of multiple types of pronunciation information:, , and . The proposed text uses only 1 entry as an example of all the types of pronunciation information previously mentioned: . Bonus: The example shows the transcription, the audio, the homophones and rhymes in order in the  example.
 * Added hyphenation.
 * Another step in the direction of having WT:EL completely voted.

Schedule:
 * Vote starts: 00:00, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Vote ends: 23:59, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

 * Vote created: --Daniel Carrero (talk) 21:20, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Discussion:
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] Beer parlour/2016/January
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] Tea room/2016/February
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2016-01/Pronunciation

Support

 * 1)  --Daniel Carrero (talk) 01:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
 * 2)  — It's an improvement, certainly. — I.S.M.E.T.A. 14:38, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Seems like no-one got in fast enough to copyedit this. Daniel Carrero, do you object to the changes I made in this diff? (If you do, or disagree with my abuse of process, you are of course free to revert them.) Even so, I feel obliged to, because the text no longer specifies how to implement the sentence "If a word is a homophone in a particular dialect, it may be added provided the dialect is referred to." - the example of how to format the context label in this scenario has been removed. This, that and the other (talk) 06:56, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I don't mind that you changed the vote. (To clarify, when he changed the vote, I was the only one who voted.) --Daniel Carrero (talk) 07:09, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
 * 1)  I'm not sure why the example word is still carrot after it clearly lost in the poll on the talk page. --WikiTiki89 16:22, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
 * It's because we New Englanders are not respected here on Wiktionary, as I have just seen myself earlier, with someone trying to insist that "squ-ehhr" (as opposed to "squeir") is the pronunciation for "square", and claiming that I am "in the minority" in thinking that it is not. Tharthan (talk) 16:24, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
 * , are you opposing the vote just because of the word carrot? Please read again the "Procedural note" in this vote and the poll introduction. The poll started only a few days ago, the word that passes should be able to replace carrot here, without the need for another formal vote. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 16:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I didn't notice that. In that case, why not delay the start of the vote? --WikiTiki89 16:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
 * That could be done if people want, but I thought the example word to be a minor issue that does not actually change the regulations so I just started the vote in the scheduled date. When "Reconstruction:" pages were voted, there was a vote for the creation of a new namespace and a poll to see what exactly would be the name. Technically, the poll could go on as long as we want. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 17:21, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
 * In the Reconstruction vote, I made sure to specify in detail exactly where and how the name of the namespace would be used. Here it is not clear what the text of the example will be, and that should be part of the vote. --WikiTiki89 18:14, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I replaced the procedural note by a note that makes it clearer. (diff) --Daniel Carrero (talk) 20:24, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
 * That does help, but unless you actually create the text of the example for each possible word, I wouldn't know what I would be voting for. --WikiTiki89 20:51, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Can't we just consider the current pronunciation section of all the current entries in the poll? But, if needed for formal voting purposes, I can create a separate page and copy all the pronunciation sections of these entries there. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 21:24, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
 * The problem is that I might disagree with how some of the examples are currently laid out in their entries. I think the text of the example is an important part of what we are voting on, and I can't vote without knowing what it would be. Perhaps we should just omit the example section entirely from this vote and vote on it in a later vote. --WikiTiki89 21:33, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
 * 1)  per Wikitiki. Carrot shouldn't be used, but several of the entries that could replace carrot need to be tweaked (e.g. the narrow transcriptions of wholly should be checked). I think it's be best to shelve this vote until we work out an example. - -sche (discuss) 04:54, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * 2)  DCDuring TALK  13:29, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
 * 3)  per Wikitiki. Tharthan (talk) 17:37, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
 * 4)  -Xbony2 (talk) 00:18, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Abstain

 * 1)  With so many opposes, I don't care to burn my attention on this proposal. --Dan Polansky (talk) 11:51, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Decision
Fails 2–6. The opposers mainly expressed concern with use of the word carrot as an example, which seems to me to be a strange reason to oppose the vote. In any case, the next step would be to discuss and refine the example word (probably using a straw poll to decide on the word, then collaboratively working on the pronunciation details to meet everyone's expectations) and return to this page with a new vote. This, that and the other (talk) 01:26, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
 * We already have a straw pool on that: Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2016-01/Pronunciation. It seems already won and should be the example word on a later vote. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 03:38, 10 March 2016 (UTC)


text: Category:ga:Echinoderms

title: Category:ga:Echinoderms


text:
Talk:бассейновый

Anatoli, is the pronunciation correct? Do the alternative pronunciations (phon=бассе́ин,бассэ́ин) have corresponding variants here? @KoreanQuoter when the base term has pronunciations with non-palatal е, the derived terms probably do too; this page shows how to format adjectives with both variants. Benwing2 (talk) 21:36, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I find бассе́ин and бассэ́ин pronunciations ([ɪ]) weird and I'm going to remove them. [bɐˈsʲejn] is much more common, [bɐˈsɛjn] is St Petersburg or dated. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 22:08, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:бассейновый


text:
disocclusion

Noun

 * 1)  The situation where a previously occluded object becomes visible.

title: disocclusion


text: disocclusions

title: disocclusions


text:
heksensteen

Noun

 * 1) adder stone

title: heksensteen


text: sensitivt

title: sensitivt


text:
一般人

Noun

 * 1) ordinary person; average person; common people

Etymology
From 🇰🇲.

Noun

 * 1) commoner; ordinary person
 * 2)  reasonable person

title: 一般人


text:
leenman

Etymology
Equivalent to.

Noun

 * 1) a liege, feudatory, seignior, or vassal

title: leenman


text:
អស្សាភរណ៍

Etymology
From +.

Noun

 * 1) harness, harnessing

title: អស្សាភរណ៍


text:
unfilthy

Adjective

 * 1) Not filthy.

title: unfilthy


text:
Morris water maze

Etymology
Conceived in 1981 by Richard G. Morris of the University of St Andrews.

Noun

 * 1) A circular pool used in experiments, usually on rodents, where the animal is supposed to find an invisible or visible platform that allows it to escape the water.

title: Morris water maze


text: Morris water mazes

title: Morris water mazes


text:
ອານມ້າ

Etymology
🇰🇲

Noun

 * 1) saddle, harness

title: ອານມ້າ


text:
caffeic

Adjective

 * of, or pertaining to coffee or caffeic acid
 * 1) * 1895, {unattributed}, The New England Medical Gazette, Volume 30
 * Caffeic poisoning showed itself chiefly in digestive and in nervous troubles, the symptoms of caffeic dyspepsia very nearly resembling those of alcoholic gastritis, such as catarrhal gastritis, saburral tongue, a marked loss of appetite, etc.

title: caffeic


text:
høyeksplosiv

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) highly explosive

title: høyeksplosiv


text:
Talk:здравствуйте

Does this also have phon=здраствуйте (no second в) when it functions as an imperative, rather than just meaning "hello"? Similarly здравствуй? Benwing2 (talk) 22:23, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes and yes. You must have meant the first "в". --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 22:25, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks, and yes I did. Benwing2 (talk) 22:31, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:здравствуйте


text:
Doogie mouse

Etymology
Named after the genius protagonist of the TV series .

Noun

 * 1) A mouse whose synapses have been enhanced by long-term potentiation, used in scientific experiments.

title: Doogie mouse


text: Doogie mice

title: Doogie mice


text:
unbesmeared

Adjective

 * 1) Not besmeared.

title: unbesmeared


text:
unbefouled

Adjective

 * 1) Not befouled.

title: unbefouled


text:
unfouled

Adjective

 * 1) Not fouled.

title: unfouled


text:
itihaas

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) history study of the past as a whole
 * 2) history the past of an object or person by itself

title: itihaas


text:
ເຄື່ອງທຽມ

Noun

 * 1) harness

title: ເຄື່ອງທຽມ


text:
vyakaran

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) grammar the rules underlying the structure of language

title: vyakaran


text:
obra maestra

Noun

 * 1) masterpiece

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) masterpiece

title: obra maestra


text: obras maestras

title: obras maestras


text:
Talk:классика

The lemma кла́ссика says it has optional gem, but the lemma кла́ссик says it has no gem. Which one is correct (or possibly both)? Benwing2 (talk) 22:30, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
 * No gem on both, IMO. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 22:43, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:классика


text: Latreillean

title: Latreillean


text:
Latreillian

Adjective

 * 1) Of or relating to  (1762–1833), French zoologist specialising in arthropods.

title: Latreillian


text: cmg

title: cmg


text: høyeksplosivt

title: høyeksplosivt


text:
морины тоног

Etymology
Form of +

Noun

 * 1) harness

title: морины тоног


text: høyeksplosive

title: høyeksplosive


text:
thorra

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) some, few a small amount

Adverb

 * 1) a little

title: thorra


text: Category:fj:Countries

title: Category:fj:Countries


text:
lerdo

Etymology
Borrowed from, of unknown origin.

Adjective

 * 1) slow
 * 2)  stupid
 * 1)  stupid

Etymology

 * presumably from, often suggested to be derived from.

Adjective

 * 1) slow, sluggish, of animals
 * 2) dim-witted, oafish, inefficient

title: lerdo


text: depolyglutamylations

title: depolyglutamylations


text: deglutamylations

title: deglutamylations


text:
Talk:bre

Etymology
Here we have the Albanian term supposedly from PIE *bhrā́ter-, Romanian from Turkish bre, Turkish bre itself with no given etymology, and Serbocroatian apparently from Greek μωρέ (the article at bwe, however, claims Turkish instead), all with the same meaning. Rather implausible, to say the least. Anyone want to take a shot at clearing out the nonsense? Vorziblix (talk) 23:13, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
 * My wrong for bwe - it descends directly from Serbo-Croatian bre. I've corrected it now. Anyway, there's some info on More (interjection), maybe sth useful about the Greek origin or stuff. Cheers, --biblbroksдискашн 23:43, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

"Supposedly"... ləl, how shady. Let me help you out: "BRE" is found in ALL Balkan languages. Thus, the "from turkish etymology" is ridiculous. Ottomans were not needed to "teach" Romanians "how to bre".
 * As for albanian: "Bre" is used for a male person. Same as "Burrë" = "man" / "Bir" = "son". Same like "more"; only for males.
 * While "Bi" is used exactly like "Bre"; but only directed at a female person. Which is also how "daughter" begins in albanian: "Bijë". Same with "moj"; only females. Also: Neither was a greek "μωρέ" needed for the Serbo-Croatian "bre". Since brate, burrë, bir, brother, Bauer etc. etc. etc. clearly emphasize masculinity. Which is the same as PIE *bhrā́ter- and illyrian "bra".
 * ■ Attention: Illyrian bra - and not greek. Do I have to mention that ancient hellens called these illyrians "barbarians"? LAGTON (talk) 23:59, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
 * ‘Supposedly’, because all the given etymologies contradict each other, so they can’t all be right. Hence why I was asking for someone more knowledgeable than me to fix it. If you have a reliable academic source that discusses the origin of bre from Illyrian bra, by all means post it; I’d love to have a linguistically sound answer. However, if this is just vague speculation, then it probably doesn’t belong here. — Vorziblix (talk · contribs) 06:13, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

title: Talk:bre


text: heptamerizations

title: heptamerizations


text: leiomyoblastomas

title: leiomyoblastomas


text: splitomicins

title: splitomicins


text:
Talk:Mazda

Translations of the company name

 * Chinese: 馬自達, 马自达 (Mǎzìdá), 松田 (Sōngtián) (always for surname Matsuda and sometimes for the company name), 萬事得, 万事得 (in Hong Kong), pronounced Wànshìdé in Mandarin

 * Japanese: マツダ, sometimes 松田

title: Talk:Mazda


text:
वाक़िफ़

Etymology
, from Arabic, from the root. Compare 🇨🇬.

Adjective

 * 1) knowledgeable having experience in a particular subject
 * 2) acquainted familiar with a person

title: वाक़िफ़


text:
Talk:pericombobulation

pericombobulation
A word invented in the script of a TV program. SemperBlotto (talk) 07:06, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
 * That by itself is not a problem, if the word has been subsequently adopted outside of the program, as was contrafibularities (from the same script). I can, however, find no evidence that this one has similarly passed into general usage. Perhaps this belongs in requests for verification? Kiwima (talk) 10:40, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

 * Send to RFV No evidence given by nominator that this fails CFI. Festivus and truthiness were also invented for TV...and they are verifiable elsewhere, so we have them. Pur ple back pack 89   14:40, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I think a better parallel is cromulent, but I have to agree. By the way, this is the Sky UK IP who has contributed thousands of really bad edits in Japanese, Chinese, and English entries that have something to do with the supernatural. Every once in a while they take an excursion into areas unrelated to their usual obsessions, but the results almost always have problems, as well- as in this case. Chuck Entz (talk) 06:20, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Although it's possible for invented terms to gain independent usage, it ought to be demonstrated that they have.  Did a wide Google search for pericombobulat- as well as a Google books search.  There were 0 book hits (although for some reason, The Call of Cthulhu appeared; that can't be a good sign), and most internet usage appeared to be quoting Blackadder (the program in which the word appeared, in a list of other fairly preposterous words, which probably explains part of why it hasn't caught on).  It's just "combobulation" with a different prefix; currently we have the root (really a back-formation; I should know as I recombobulated it myself), discombobulation, and recombobulation.  As the entry indicates, it's used to mean a state of confusion caused by someone running in circles around you; not a likely word, and not a logical formation, as that would be peridiscombobulation; pericombobulation should mean something along the lines of "around-organizing", and the only particularly sensible use I can think of would be to refer to the process of composing or arranging a desk or work-station; I can't imagine there's a real need for a specialized word for this.  So I don't even feel tempted to keep this around, as there's next to no evidence of its use outside of quotations from the program in which it appeared, or blog/message board posts by the program's fans, and it doesn't seem to have a logical or useful meaning or application.  P Aculeius (talk) 16:19, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Send to RFV unless it's so obviously uncitable that it can be speedied. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 06:23, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
 * That's why I voted delete. 0 book hits, numerous quotations from the show on message boards, a couple of blogs/profiles with it as a user name, and no evidence of independent usage as far as I can tell.  If it's citable, perhaps somebody could come up with a couple of good citations.  P Aculeius (talk) 16:10, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Why is this here? Move to RFV. Renard Migrant (talk) 12:35, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

 * RFD closed as out of scope; WT:RFV created. This closure seems supported by three people above. Speculations in RFD whether a term meets RFV is what we sometimes do but is not really a good process. --Dan Polansky (talk) 12:51, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

RFV discussion: January 2016–April 2017
English. Entered to mean (humorous) Expression of disturbance and confusion because someone has been running circles around them (see Etymology). --Dan Polansky (talk) 12:48, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Google Books has 0 hits. All uses in a regular Google search seemed to be either quotations from Blackadder (the program in which the word was introduced), or non-quoted borrowings from its lexicon by the show's fans for message board postings, blogs, or user names.  I couldn't find any evidence of independent usage, and certainly nothing to suggest that the word is ever used for its literal meaning, which is hardly surprising, considering that 1) there would be few occasions in one's lifetime where such a term would come in handy, children on a playground notwithstanding (they're unlikely to know such a word); 2) only fans of Blackadder would have the slightest idea what the user was talking about; and 3) since combobulation means "arranging, composing, or organizing", pericombobulation actually means the opposite of what it's supposed to, thereby making the term even less useful and more confusing (although not quite arising to the level of being discombobulating).  P Aculeius (talk) 13:40, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
 * . --Dan Polansky (talk) 13:49, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
 * All of which translates to zero usability. Just because Google Books turns up a book doesn't mean the word is in it.  If you search the text of the listed books, you won't find "pericombobulation" in them.  Even without looking I can state without fear of contradiction that it does not occur in The Cat in the Hat.  If the word were used in any of the books, there would likely be a quoted passage for each one showing the usage.  The only hit is "Urban Dictionary", which as we all know is a perfectly useless web site for establishing that a word has an established, independent usage.  All of the message board hits appear to be direct quotations of the dialogue in "Blackadder".  The online dictionary search turned up zero hits in real dictionaries; the only hit was for "Urban Dictionary".  So we're exactly where we were before.  P Aculeius (talk) 15:09, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
 * The searches I posted are for convenience of whoever tries to attest the term, including a search that includes Usenet. Of course, not every hit found in these searches meets WT:ATTEST. A similar helper template generates . --Dan Polansky (talk) 15:31, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I believe it is attestable from Usenet, and have just added 3 cites (one for the plural). It always appears to be used self-consciously with the knowledge of its Blackadder origins, though not always as a direct quotation. Our definition might be too specific. Equinox ◑ 18:19, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
 * According to WT:ATTEST, "Attested means verified through: 1) clearly widespread use, or 2) use in permanently recorded media, conveying meaning, in at least three independent instances spanning at least a year...." We're definitely not talking about a word in widespread use, so it must meet all of the criteria in the second clause.  Does the word "convey meaning" in the example sentences?
 * Example 1: "We have identified an anuspeptic [sic], some would say phrasmotic [sic], phased paradigm shift in the market of interphrastic proportions. It's causing much contrafribbilarities [sic] and indeed much pericombobulation in the ABC1 sector. Frankly, we're Donald Ducked." The preceding sentence makes clear that this example was deliberate nonsense intended to confuse an audience.  The word was not used to convey meaning.
 * Example 2: You'll have to excuse Justin's hypersyllabic pericombobulations. Someone dropped a thesaurus on his head and he's still a bit dizzy. Here the writer apparently meant peregrinations, but used the wrong word.  He was describing someone using very long words (hence "hypersyllabic" and the reference to a thesaurus), not a state of disarray induced by being run circles around.  Probably the writer did not have a clear idea of what the word meant and did not care, as long as it sounded very complicated and would not be recognized by his audience, consisting of fans of the Toronto Blue Jays.
 * Example 3: Oh come now, I for one am quite phrasmotic for the pericombobulation Paul has suffered, and can only wish that in future he will have the sense to complete his assignments more interphrastically. The sentence makes no sense, as its meaning depends not just on the term in question, but upon two other nonsense words from the same source, neither of which has any known definition.  It is possible for the word to have its alleged meaning in this sentence, but out of context we have no idea what it means, or whether the unfortunate Paul has been run circles around at all, and since the rest of the sentence is nonsense, it seems highly improbable that the word was used for its ostensible meaning.
 * Example 4: I hope this is not causing the poster any pericombobulations. It is not apparent from the context whether the word is being used for its alleged meaning here, or if the user simply meant "discomfort" or "difficulty" and chose the second cousin once removed of the word intended.  Searched all of the posts on the message board with the title cited, and found none by the alleged author.  Searched all of the author's posts in that forum for the whole year, and could not find the word.  Given the average length of his posts, it seems unlikely that he meant anything other than "distress"; he was not using the term for its specific meaning.
 * Lastly, the uses are supposed to be independent. Example sentences 1, 3, and 4 are all patterned directly on the original Blackadder dialogue; the first sentence combines five nonsense words from the program; the third uses three of them, and both the third and fourth parallel the original's statement of remorse for having "caused you such pericombobulations."  They're not direct quotations, but somewhat of a paraphrase, but they're certainly not independent.  So what we really have here is a word that's seldom if ever used independently of references to Blackadder, and so far there are no other instances in which it's used for its purported meaning; generally it seems to be used solely to confuse or befuddle the audience, or imply general discomfort, without any sense of discomposing people by running in circles around them.  P Aculeius (talk) 01:22, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Seems just barely attested, but that's enough. But delete example 2 which is for a different sense, the remaining 3 have the same general meaning. The uses are independent of one another, which is what is meant by the attest criterion. Yes, they are allusions to BA, but still independent uses - otherwise we'd have to take out every coinage of Shakespeare's. Also, I suggest we remove the stuff about running around in circles, that is not supported by the citations. - Sonofcawdrey (talk) 02:21, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

 * RFV-passed accordingly. - -sche (discuss) 07:28, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:pericombobulation


text:
friluft

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) the open air

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) the open air

title: friluft


text:
michmaliztli

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) it is the catching of fish or shellfish; fishing.
 * 2) * Idem, f. 56r. col. 1.
 * Michmaliztli. peſca de peces.
 * Michmaliztli. the fishing of fish.
 * Michmaliztli. peſca de peces.
 * Michmaliztli. the fishing of fish.

Synonyms

 * the catching of fish ,

title: michmaliztli


text:
michahxiliztli

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) it is the catching of fish; fishing.
 * 2) * Idem, f. 56r. col. 1.
 * Michaxiliztli. peſca de peces.
 * Michaxiliztli. the fishing of fish.
 * Michaxiliztli. peſca de peces.
 * Michaxiliztli. the fishing of fish.

Synonyms

 * the catching of fish ,

title: michahxiliztli


text: michaxiliztli

title: michaxiliztli


text:
Talk:сковороду

Is this pronunciation ско́вроду (missing an о) really correct? Benwing2 (talk) 00:03, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I find it strange but I don't use this 2nd declension pattern either. I heard it but without vowel droppings. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 00:08, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:сковороду


text:
mülüda

Verb

 * 1) to fit, to fit into

title: mülüda


text:
üldüda

Etymology
Related to Finnish.

title: üldüda


text:
hijoda

Etymology
From.

title: hijoda


text:
imilpan

Noun

 * 1) ; in his or her sown fields.

title: imilpan


text:
kadoda

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to disappear, to vanish

title: kadoda


text:
Talk:argue down

RFD discussion: November 2015–January 2016
Doesn't look like a phrasal verb to me. --SimonP45 (talk) 11:10, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

No consensus to delete. Possibly an RfV candidate. bd2412 T 16:32, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep, not transparent SOP. Smurrayinchester (talk) 11:31, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Move to RfC to make clear what is transitive and what is intransitive, else delete now. DCDuring TALK 11:46, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Just to reinforce, keep, at least for "His wife argued him down from his trip to Vegas". --Dan Polansky (talk) 18:17, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:argue down


text:
Talk:Java Community Process

RFD discussion: December 2015
"A formalised process to determine future features of the Java platform." Is this kind of thing includable? It seems analogous to the name of an event, conference, or publication: i.e. it's more of a "title" than a term. Equinox ◑ 16:08, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete DCDuring TALK 01:50, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
 * No matter how I think about it, this doesn't feel like it belongs in a dictionary. Delete. —suzukaze (t・c) 08:02, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

 * Weak delete; not sure why. Governed by WT:NSE (Names of specific entities), I think. --Dan Polansky (talk) 11:30, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

deleted -- Liliana • 11:51, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

title: Talk:Java Community Process


text:
Talk:key notion

RFD discussion: December 2015
SoP, see key adj. Perhaps the given translation could go to crux or somewhere. Equinox ◑ 19:55, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete, nothing to add it's just that straightforward. Renard Migrant (talk) 23:08, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. DCDuring TALK 23:22, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Deleted. —msh210℠ (talk) 21:09, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Transparent SOP. bd2412 T 15:58, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

title: Talk:key notion


text:
Talk:garantipruntejo

RFD discussion: December 2015
Seems to be made up --Stubborn Pen (talk) 16:49, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Normally I'd say this is an RFV matter but I'm ok with speedy deleting old Tbot entries as Tbot isn't a human user. Renard Migrant (talk) 19:33, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Um, Tbot was run by a human, wasn't it? Donnanz (talk) 10:27, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Well all bots are 'run' by a human aren't they? Tbot was pretty hands off creating translations based on other wikis and translations here. My point is really I wouldn't subject entries with no human input to the same standard I would entries created by humans. The French Wiktionary ended up with fr:stick to the pan at one point because of their version of Tbot. Renard Migrant (talk) 12:29, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * As I posted below, Tbot got this from a translation at pawnshop, and the translation was entered by a human. --Dan Polansky (talk) 12:41, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

 * First of all, you know better than to post this at RFD rather than RFV. Secondly, I deleted it per MG. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 07:23, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

 * On one hand, Tbot was a bot, using an algorithm. But Tbot would pick garantipruntejo from a translation table (indeed, it is still at pawnshop), and the form would typically be entered into the translation table by a human. So entries created by Tbot should not be easier to delete. The propoper process is RFV; deleting via RFD is out of order. --Dan Polansky (talk) 10:44, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Historically, that's not been how people see it. The entries are only as trustworthy as the translations, and those can be removed without an RFV, so the unchecked entries should be as well. And believe me, you don't want RFV to be flooded with all the shit that Tbot has created, because there were a lot of terrible entries, and many still exist. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 17:45, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I've never seen any evidence that Tbot has created significant volume of bad entries. I certainly saw no bad Czech entries that Tbot created. Nor have I any reason to believe that Tbot generally created bad entries: if anything, Tbot merely replicated what was in translation tables into separate entries. --Dan Polansky (talk) 18:42, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Maybe some users only notice the bad Tbot entries, but as Dan says the majority were good, and only needed confirming. They were taken from translation tables when no entry existed in the appropriate language at the time. There's about 50 left in Norwegian which I must get around to doing, and plenty left in German when I last looked. Donnanz (talk) 18:56, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * There was a lot of crap, and I think most of it has been cleaned up a while ago. RU was not at all careful when adding translations, so those he did himself, chiefly Swahili, are among the worst offenders. I suppose there were no incompetent users adding Czech translations when Tbot was active. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 19:12, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * The point is that knowing that an entry was created by Tbot gives you no more indication of craphood than knowing that an entry was created directly by a human. Put diffently, Tbot-created is no better predictor of craphood than human-created. --Dan Polansky (talk) 19:21, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Actually, tools.wmflabs.org created pages counter for TBot gives me mere 78 deleted entries, which is astounding. --Dan Polansky (talk) 19:22, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Some were possibly corrected rather than being deleted: I seem to remember doing that. Donnanz (talk) 19:50, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Sure, but given the translation tables could contain all sort of human-entered malinformation, it is still pretty awesome. From what I remember, Tbot also checked against the non-English Wiktionaries. It seemed actually pretty clever. --Dan Polansky (talk) 22:20, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Even if the translations were added by a human, the entries were not created by them. It is in no way inaccurate to say these entries weren't created by humans. Renard Migrant (talk) 23:56, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
 * It's not worth arguing the toss about it: just verify the remaining Tbot entries if you can; for example Portuguese and Danish are completely done. Donnanz (talk) 14:16, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
 * It is not inaccurate but it is irrelevant. Your argument for speedy rests on the claim that, because the entry was created by a bot, it is therefore less reliable. That argument has been refuted; the bot-made entry is as reliable as the human-made addition to the translation table used by the bot. --Dan Polansky (talk) 11:23, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * No, because adding a red linked translation is not equivalent to making an entry. Furthermore that isn't really my argument anyway. In a nutshell, you can't hurt a bot's feelings by deleting an entry. A lot of RFD is about following the proper procedure so nobody gets upset, whereas you can skip all that with a bot, because the bot won't be getting upset you delete its entry. Renard Migrant (talk) 16:05, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * To quote you, "I wouldn't subject entries with no human input to the same standard I would entries created by humans". That has been refuted: these entries did have human input. And RFD is about a general proper consensus-based process, not about avoding hurting someone's feelings. No one has shown Tbot entries were generally less reliable than entries directly created by humans. All the hatred toward Tbot entries that I have seen in Wiktionary is irrational, as far as I can tell. --Dan Polansky (talk) 16:15, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * So if I write a book and someone makes a movie based on that book, I've made a film have I? Renard Migrant (talk) 16:17, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * That does not seem to be an applicable analogy, mostly because a Tbot entry contains the exact information that was previously in the translation table and nothing else, whereas a movie based on a book contains much added material. Tbot does not add any information or make any inductive inferences; it merely picks what is in one page and places it in another page in a different syntactic format. --Dan Polansky (talk) 16:25, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * And again, for the reader, only 78 Tbot entries were deleted in all time, and this RFD is about deleting a Tbot entry. --Dan Polansky (talk) 16:27, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Since Tbot created 36 389 entries and 78 were deleted, the probability that a randomly picked Tbot created entry should be deleted is about 0.2%. --Dan Polansky (talk) 16:29, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * There's no hatred towards Tbot entries, just, the ones that are left are left for a reason. Either we have no access to competent speakers of the language in question, or we do and none of them can verify the entry. Remember the whole idea behind Tbot entries according to Robert Ullmann who ran the bot was that leftover entries would get deleted. The difference is translations get less scrutiny than entries, and this bot makes translations into entries with no scrutiny, meaning bad translations that nobody's looked it get full entries. Renard Migrant (talk) 16:30, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't see why the leftover should be deleted. And I don't see why separate entries are considered more reliable than entries in translation tables; I saw no evidence to support that claim. Again, only 78 Tbot entries were deleted; that low number is probably explained by Tbot's double checking in other Wiktionaries AFAIR. Just check the data; it is much more interesting than speculation. --Dan Polansky (talk) 16:36, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

title: Talk:garantipruntejo


text:
Talk:take aloft

RFD discussion: November 2015–January 2016
Doesn't look like a phrasal verb to me. --SimonP45 (talk) 11:09, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

 * Keep It's not really "take" "aloft" (any more than take off is "take" "off"), although the usage example isn't the clearest. Have changed to a better one. Smurrayinchester (talk) 11:30, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. (MWOnline) + . It is just like "I took the car to the garage." DCDuring TALK  12:26, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
 * But in "He took aloft", what is being taken? Smurrayinchester (talk) 13:15, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I was focused on "transitive" use.
 * Is what you are focused on something analogous to They took to the streets? If so, take after a purse snatcher (MWOnline) would seem to cover it. DCDuring TALK  18:45, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't see that sense at [[take]], DCDuring. Am I missing it? —msh210℠ (talk) 20:39, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. There are synonyms such as "take to the skies" and "take to the air". I suppose you could say that the object is an unexpressed "oneself". Chuck Entz (talk) 20:33, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Many intransitive verbs can be looked at that way (as "understood" reflexives) in one or more of their definitions. DCDuring TALK 21:15, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

 * Keep. Renard Migrant (talk) 18:22, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep for the time being, seems very idiomatic to me - i.e. from the sum of its parts I would have never expected it to mean what it is defined as .... this however raises the question of how accurate the def is - the intransitive especially is interesting, but I'd like to see more citations --Sonofcawdrey (talk) 14:18, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
 * This is the same use of take as in take wing (which apparently seems idiomatic to some lexicographers), take to the air, take to sea, and take across the road and similar to take to flying. This sense of take seems archaic to me, as does aloft. Combining archaic uses of words does not necessarily an idiom make, especially if the combination is itself archaic (or literary). DCDuring TALK 14:33, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Kept. bd2412 T 22:11, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:take aloft


text:
Talk:act as

RFD discussion: December 2015
Sum of parts? ---> Tooironic (talk) 10:33, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. It seems SoP to me. At least and  are used with as ("in the role of") with the same meaning as in the definition of act as. Many specific action verbs can also be used with as, eg, "Fred ran as anchor in the relay.". The alternative construction act to [verb] has just about the same meaning of act as well.
 * "Role" in the definition of as should be either replaced or supplemented by a word that included functions that are not "roles", such as those typically served by inanimate things: "[The coffee table|George] acted as doorstop." DCDuring TALK 11:41, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Compare serve as, function as (both above) work as. Usual meaning of act, usual meaning of as. Renard Migrant (talk) 11:44, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
 * And indeed labor as. Renard Migrant (talk) 13:25, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

 * Delete per nom. bd2412 T 13:50, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. See also the deletion discussion now at WT:RFD (later to be at Talk:act for).  ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 17:42, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

 * Delete. Equinox ◑ 01:21, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Deleted. bd2412 T 17:08, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

title: Talk:act as


text:
Talk:-adelphous

RFD discussion: December 2015–January 2016
There are a set of botanical terms referring to stamens (the male/pollen-bearing parts of the flower) being joined together: if they're monadelphous, they're fused into one unit, diadelphous, two units, etc. They're compounds, including prefixes derived from Ancient Greek numbers and some morpheme derived from, which is Ancient Greek for brother.

This entry is based on the premise that those terms are made up of only two parts: the numeric prefix and this suffix.

That premise is wrong: to start with, is a noun, but all of the compounds are adjectives. This is obviously due to the presence of the adjectival suffix -ous. There's also the matter of a parallel set of nouns: monadelphy, diadelphy etc., which refer to the state of being monadelphous, diadelphous, etc. These are analyzed as the numeral prefixes + the noun adelphy.

So why are the first set based on a prefix and a suffix, while the others are based on a prefix and a free-standing word? The -adelphous entry tries to explain this by saying that adelphous doesn't exist as a free-standing word- but it does exist, we have an entry for it, and the entry's etymology derives it from + -ous.

I'm not sure whether the correct etymologies are number prefix + + -ous/-y or number prefix + adelphous/adelphy, but either way, this entry is based on an error and should be deleted. Chuck Entz (talk) 05:46, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. My understanding is that is a back-formation of sorts, so the first possibility in your last sentence is what appears to be the correct one. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 05:49, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete or redirect. — Ungoliant (falai) 13:56, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

 * Deleted. Feel free to redirect if you see fit. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 06:32, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:-adelphous


text:
Talk:委婉說法

RFD discussion: November 2015–January 2016
Not a word in Chinese. Not in any dictionaries at my disposal. 委婉 + 說法. Can also be expressed as 委婉講法. ---> Tooironic (talk) 09:44, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. bd2412 T 16:12, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. Entered to mean "euphemism". 委婉 (tactful; polite) + 說法 (way of saying something; wording; version). The simplified form is 委婉说法, which is in bab.la, dictionary.cambridge.org, and cn.bing.co. Should 委婉語 be deleted as well, as 委婉 (tactful; polite) + 語 (dialect; language; speech)? Is the reader really better off without these entries, or should they be there so that the reader know one actually says that in Chinese? --Dan Polansky (talk) 11:31, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Undecided. Reliability of lemmings should be checked. means "tactful/polite way of saying". One could also say  "tactful/indirect term/expression". Both are fine in an English-Chinese dictionary but may not be as Chinese entries. As Tooironic said,  can replaced with the synonymous  ("way of saying").  can replaced with . --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 11:47, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I recommend having a closer look at the example sentences at cn.bing.co; really interesting material. --Dan Polansky (talk) 12:46, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

 * , on the other hand, is included in major dictionaries and is never used separately, only as a component. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 12:45, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * As an aside: are any of these major dictionaries online? Do we have reference templates for them? --Dan Polansky (talk) 12:52, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Yesterday I have checked in Wenlin (uses ABC dictionary) and Pleco. Here's an online dictionary MDBG. We need templates for Chinese dictionaries, I'm not sure if there are any.--Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад)|

No consensus. bd2412 T 02:11, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:委婉說法


text:
Bunyanian

Adjective

 * 1) Of or relating to  (1628–1688), English Christian writer and preacher, best known for his allegorical book .

title: Bunyanian


text:
melon milpan

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) in a field or plot of land sown with melon plants.
 * 2) * Idem, f. 55v. col. 1.
 * Melon milpa. melonar.
 * Melon milpa. a melon field.
 * Melon milpa. melonar.
 * Melon milpa. a melon field.

title: melon milpan


text: Wathawurrung

title: Wathawurrung


text: packtrains

title: packtrains


text: pack trains

title: pack trains


text:
randha

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) widow

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) an opening
 * 2) cleft
 * 3) weak spot, flaw, defect

title: randha


text:
เยอรมัน

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) German.

title: เยอรมัน


text:
Reconstruction talk:Proto-Indo-European/weǵʰ-

Descendants
Let us add the "weight" derivatives, for clearer picture. Zezen (talk) 00:54, 1 February 2016 (UTC)


text:
Talk:rollup

Missing database sense?
e.g. SQL Server has a ROLLUP keyword for some kind of summarising of totals into a grand total. See. Equinox ◑ 00:58, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:rollup


text:
แคนาดา

Etymology
From.

title: แคนาดา


text:
unblockage

Noun

 * 1) The process by which something is unblocked.

title: unblockage


text: unblockages

title: unblockages


text: unblockings

title: unblockings


text:
せつじ

Noun

 * 1)  an affix

title: せつじ


text: setsuji

title: setsuji


text:
せっとうじ

Noun

 * 1)  a prefix

title: せっとうじ


text: 接頭語

title: 接頭語


text:
せっとうご

Noun

 * 1)  a prefix

title: せっとうご


text: settōgo

title: settōgo


text: settōji

title: settōji


text:
míbhuntáisteach

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) disadvantageous

title: míbhuntáisteach


text: setsubiji

title: setsubiji


text:
せつびじ

Noun

 * 1)  a suffix

title: せつびじ


text: 接尾語

title: 接尾語


text:
せつびご

Noun

 * 1)  a suffix

title: せつびご


text: setsubigo

title: setsubigo


text:
Talk:Йоркшир

Can you check the pronunciation? Does it have a pronunciation with unstressed, unreduced о? Benwing2 (talk) 01:41, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I think it should only be unreduced if "о" is unstressed. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 02:03, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:Йоркшир


text: setchūji

title: setchūji


text:
せっちゅうじ

Noun

 * 1)  an infix

title: せっちゅうじ