text:
User talk:Qehath/Archive 2013-4

أكثر العربية
Arabic, Arabic, more Arabic (MSA), please. I know you can do it, even if you don't want to! :) It's the hardest language with almost no resources. Hope you'll overcome your frustration with working here some day and come back recharged and strong to handle more conjugation and declension templates. ياالله يا ريك!. --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 05:06, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

 * I'm doing it my way, though :P Fuck the haters. And yeah, if I do Arabic it'll mostly be Fúṣħā and Maṣréyya. —  [Ric Laurent] — 12:16, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
 * (Part of why is that I've been doing it mostly for my benefit, anyway. Making wiktionary entries is easier than writing down a bunch of notes by pen. Although I will need to do that. I'm just lazy. —  [Ric Laurent] — 12:22, 10 January 2013 (UTC))

User:Dick Laurent/Sandbox
Sorry, I failed you on Arabic declension templates. I've been away from reading and learning Arabic for too long now. I found also a bit hard to read the meanings of labels. If you have specific questions about a form, please ask. I will try and find the answer in my reference books. --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 09:52, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

 * Haha don't worry about it. I've grown uncomfortable with the template, anyway. —  [Ric Laurent] — 13:18, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

ta4kantoIPA!!
MORE PL!:P

 * Damn. I really wish I knew what the fuck was going on here. —  [Ric Laurent] — 15:14, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Are you sure this translation is correct? We don't have an entry for "Anglo", and states that it means "Englishman". I've never seen it used to mean "English". --Yair rand (talk) 08:10, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

 * S O F I X I T —  [Ric Laurent] — 16:41, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Would someone do me the kindness...
...of unblocking me and explaining to CodeCat that his/her opinion of what is appropriate is irrelevant to me and if he/she has a problem, he/she should express it like a man/woman, and possibly consider blocking him/her for inappropriate use of block, thanks. —  [Ric Laurent] — 23:17, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Dammit, I really don't want to get in the middle of this. So, yeah, I'm going to unblock you, mainly because it's my fault that you got blocked in the first place (but the burying kittens thing was sort of funny, and not really that offensive). But, no, blocking CodeCat is not going to happen. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 23:21, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

 * For the record, I added that sentence (and entry) because I in fact had just gotten done burying a bunch of dead kittens. —  [Ric Laurent] — 23:25, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

 * Although I don't care about offensiveness per se, things like masturbation and kitten-killing seem really unexpected and eye-opening, whereas IMO a good usex should be textbooky-neutral and beige, so that the word being demonstrated doesn't get mired in distractions and irrelevances. The nuclear option is to ban made-up examples and insist on books, heh. That would go down well. Equinox ◑ 23:38, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

 * They were dead before I buried them.
 * And no, I didn't cause their death.
 * I usually restrict my examples about masturbation to entries for vulgar words. I'm an asshole, but I'm not fucking retarded. Let's have examples like "If you masturbate you go to hell" on entries like جلق زدن, that'd be brilliant. —  [Ric Laurent] — 23:43, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

 * Something in the newspaper today about analysis of stuff people "like" on bullshit social networks being an extremely good statistical predictor of who they are (i.e. race, gender, region). Combining this with the kinds of law that let an idiot be arrested for making a racist comment on Twitter, I think there is unprecedented scope for pissing people off (i.e. take the statistics, decide what example sentence they want to see, and pick the opposite). There is nothing more dangerous than giving everybody what they want. I hope you are well. etc. Equinox ◑ 22:01, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

 * Luckily I live in a part of the country less prone to nanny statism than places like New York, where soda is killing people.
 * I particularly appreciate the last bit of that. The feeling is mutual. You're one of the small handful of editors I think has a respectable amount of intelligence. Trăiești. —  [Ric Laurent] — 22:14, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Need your help with a Russian verb template
Hiya,

I'm starting to write some Russian verb templates and already stuck with a small issue in Template:ru-verb-1a-impf: On this line:

 * style="text-align:center;"|ся

If parameter 2 (perfective form) is missing, I'd like to display nothing in the cell reflexive/perfective, else I want to show this: ся

недомогать is an example WITHOUT a perfective form, нацеливать WITH it (reflexive/perfective: наце́литься). Could you please help?

(BTW, I didn't understand that Persian comment on Vahag's talk page.) --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 03:36, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

 * I think I fixed it :) --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 04:08, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

 * Lol sorry, been off reading. :D But let me know if you need anything.
 * The Persian comment said "Why is there a refrigerator in here?" —  [Ric Laurent] — 04:37, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

 * What is that, some North Carolinian hip new slang? I don't get it :) --Vahag (talk) 13:48, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

 * In one of my favorite shows, there's a scene where there's some office competition and whoever wins gets this refrigerator. There's a guy who isn't paying attention and he says "Why's there a refrigerator in here?" My friends and I thought it was hilarious, so now whenever I see a refrigerator, I say "why is there a refrigerator in here?" I dunno, I just kind of felt like saying it. In Persian lol. —  [Ric Laurent] — 15:52, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

User talk:ZxxZxxZ
Please take a look. Thanks! —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 00:16, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Some Hindi
I've been working on Mauritian Creole, and came upon a few words marked in a dictionary as being from Hindi but without the etymon given, and I can't figure 'em out. Could you please take a look? The pages are douk, gunga, jos, and nisa. (PS: Why should you do this? I dunno, to be nice or something. Or maybe to repay me for unblocking you, which someone probably would've done pretty quickly anyway... Whatever.) —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 01:28, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

 * I do believe I troubleshot Module:tg-translit for you. At any rate, I don't recognize any of these words. My Hindustani is rather limited. —  [Ric Laurent] — 01:41, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
 * True... if I was a good person I would've troubleshot in meself. For some reason, I thought you did Hindi/Urdu stuff. I guess I'll go searching for somebody, then. Thanks for gunga, Anatoli. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 02:02, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Tajiki
Hi! Could you fix Module:tg-translit so that it transliterates the izofa and the vowels properly. It currently does not show the insertion of "y" in between vowels and for the izofa after vowels (as is done for Farsi). For example дарёӣ should transliterate as daryoyī (not daryoī), and in case of izofa Ҷумҳурии Тоҷикистон should transliterate as Jumhuri-yi Tojikiston (and not Jumhurii Tojikiston). Thanks. --Dijan (talk) 17:39, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

 * I don't really know how these module things work. —  [Ric Laurent] — 20:15, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

be honest now
Should I kill myself? --Æ&Œ (talk) 17:31, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

 * Not if you're hot, in which case you should give yourself to me. —  [Ric Laurent] — 19:23, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

 * --Æ&Œ (talk) 19:37, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

 * Which one are you most like? I'd say Twilight for me, if I weren't such a dick. I'm like half Twilight, half Rainbow Dash. Brony power. —  [Ric Laurent] — 19:44, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

 * Likely Twilight Sparkle, though I am far more autistic. Rarity is a runner‐up, since I appreciate elegance. None of them are really language nerds, though. --Æ&Œ (talk) 19:51, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

 * I haven't seen any 'foreign' languages on the show yet. —  [Ric Laurent] — 19:58, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

 * Applebloom speaks French at one point. And Rarity says ‘et tu’ at one point. Have you already seen all of the current episodes? --Æ&Œ (talk) 20:00, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

 * I remember that little bit of French now, but I can't remember when it was or what she said. But no, I think I've only seen up to the first few episodes of season 3. —  [Ric Laurent] — 20:01, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

 * ‘Sacré bleu ! Plus de marque de Cutie ! Qu’est‐ce que c’est ? Je parle français ?’ Fun fact: in the French version, she speaks Old French. --Æ&Œ (talk) 20:05, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

 * That's kind of weird. She should speak something ridiculously random like Matsés. —  [Ric Laurent] — 20:11, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

 * Not sure why you say that. More than likely, the writers of the show have no idea that that exists. --Æ&Œ (talk) 20:15, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

 * Well they should; it's totally bizarre. —  [Ric Laurent] — 20:19, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

 * But what would the Cutie Mark look like? --Æ&Œ (talk) 20:22, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

 * Hmm... Good point. —  [Ric Laurent] — 20:34, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Heh. Thanks for the conversation; you aren’t so bad after all. I look forward to seeing you create more Romance entries. --Æ&Œ (talk) 20:38, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

 * Don't hold your breath; I have no plans for any kind of heavy editing, Romance or otherwise.
 * But yes, I'm pretty much balls-deep fantastic. —  [Ric Laurent] — 20:41, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Telugu verbs
There are few hundreds of en:Category:Telugu verbs. I want to classify them; to begin with into transitive and intransitive forms. What template to use in English wiktionary.Rajasekhar1961 (talk) 10:54, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

 * Spanish verbs are classified as ending in -ar, -er, or -ir. They add the category such as Category:Spanish verbs ending in -ar to each verb. You could add Category:Telugu transitive verbs or Category:Telugu intransitive verbs to each Telugu verb. If you want, you could also add in front of a definition. —Stephen (Talk) 11:05, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

 * If there were a te-verb template, it could be added to that. Like or  . —  [Ric Laurent] — 18:38, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

 * There is, . But I don’t know how to add it. —Stephen (Talk) 08:20, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Please help in this matter if you can. Thanks.Rajasekhar1961 (talk) 09:27, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Arabic verbs in Lua
Hi man,

Do you understand Lua? I want to try and convert conjugation tables into Lua, so that adding a new conjugation function would be easier. --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 06:28, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

 * No, I have no idea what any of that shit means... Looks like my days of building wondrous and magnificent templates are over. —  [Ric Laurent] — 12:27, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

 * "No, I have no idea what any of that shit means... Looks like my days of building wondrous and magnificent templates are over."
 * I did just as well repeat Dick's last comment since it sums up nicely what I think, too, about Lua to this day. --Daniel 06:36, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Romanization of Mandarin
Please note that the tone mark is marked on the i of ui in the romanization of Mandarin, as opposed to what you done to 回憶 and what you done to 記憶. --Kc kennylau (talk) 02:27, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

 * Those are from eight fucking years ago. Get lost. —  [Ric Laurent] — 16:14, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

 * And stay lost while you're at it? (I'm just joking, though.) --Lo Ximiendo (talk) 00:47, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Entry requested
Since this adjective applies to you, could you create bigdicked?

 * I love you, whoever you are. I could only find citations for big-dicked, so that's where I'll put the entry. —  [Ric Laurent] — 14:27, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Do you think we can have dip one's wick as well? And can the word bury have a sexual connotation? --Fsojic (talk) 20:09, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

 * I'm not going to do the first one. But it's good. "Bury" can, but I think only people like me would use phrases like "bury my dick in." —  [Ric Laurent] — 21:50, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Lithuanian sausas
Hi, if you're ever still here, here's one Lithuanian adjective that you could tackle: sausas (dry). --Lo Ximiendo (talk) 16:13, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

 * You do it. —  [Ric Laurent] — 00:05, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

 * I did it. BTW, Vahagn said that my hobby of looking for and filling in yellow links (if you made a modification of either gadgets or preferences to make such links) is hurting Wiktionary. Like masturbating with a flowing bath tub faucet on an etheric basis. --Lo Ximiendo (talk) 15:04, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

 * I don't know what yellow links entail, but Vahag is a מענטש. I'm inclined to trust his judgment. If you're going to masturbate, do it responsibly. Then put it on Xtube. —  [Ric Laurent] — 16:05, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

 * I don't visit Xtube. Have a look at WT:PREFS under "Preferences relating to navigation and editing" to know what I mean. --Lo Ximiendo (talk) 00:54, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

պուց / կլիր entries
Hello, you've reverted an edit I've made. Those example sentences are too obscene and I think don't need to be included in the entries for the page. Thank you Սէրուժ (talk) 05:56, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

 * They are only obscene because the words are obscene. If you have a problem with the obscenity, it is because of the words. They don't need to be included, but then no example sentence needs to be included anywhere. Examples are for people who are studying grammar, syntax. Some of us have an easier time remembering things if the example sentences are funny or racy, as those are. There have been times I haven't studied a language in years and have looked at a long sentence and remembered what it means because of one vulgar word. You might not like it, but it is helpful to people like me who live with their minds set on genitals. —  [Ric Laurent] — 10:34, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I don't agree with you. We don't need example sentences that are so particularly obscene in nature.  Maybe you can keep a person copy of these sentences in your own archive and look back at them from time to time.  These are simple nouns, and it is reasonable to say that we don't need such outlandish example sentences.  Best unto you, Սէրուժ (talk) 16:00, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't really care if you agree, but if you want to disadvantage people who aren't as wholesome as you, I don't care enough about Wiktionary to fight with you. You say they're "simple nouns," but I notice you don't remove the "vulgar" tags. Good luck with your purification of the hideous vulgarity of Wiktionary. —  [Ric Laurent] — 16:37, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

Dick Laurent, the Rimjob King
Q: How many rimjobs had Dick Laurent received?

A: Scientists themselves cannot express it in notation, but it’s at least 50 billion.

Q: How does Dick Laurent receive so many rimjobs?

A: For the same reason Santa can visit every house in a night.

Q: How old is Dick Laurent?

A: Dick Laurent has no age, because he has been receiving rimjobs for as long as the universe has existed.

Q: Does Dick Laurent ever stop receiving rimjobs?

A: No. He can do gymnastics and still be receiving a rimjob.

Q: How does Dick Laurent find so many rimjobs?

A: He doesn’t, rimjobs find him like metal finds a magnet. --Æ&Œ (talk) 03:47, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

 * Somehow you've managed to associate me with one of the few sexual acts in which I take no pleasure... So I'm just going to assume this means you want to lick me. —  [Ric Laurent] — 02:10, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

 * Lolwut? You made this and you said that you would do something if L.W.C. would lick your arsehole. I’m not sexually attracted to men, by the way. Lo siento. --Æ&Œ (talk) 09:56, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

 * הייתה בדיחה.
 * If you're not interested in men I don't understand why you're interested in my getting tongued in the tokhes. —  [Ric Laurent] — 10:56, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

זנה
I love that committing adultery and visiting prostitutes are lexically equivalent. Cultural, or historical? Today I talked to a nice Japanese girl at a barbecue and she had a T-shirt with Arabic on it, which I painfully attempted to spell out. I think I've forgotten all the damn Arabic a month after the exam. Why was the Japanese girl wearing an Arabic shirt in England. This I do not comprehend. Yours sincerely, Equinox ◑ 23:15, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

 * Maybe someone better with Biblical Hebrew will change the definition at some point. I based it on what my dictionaries and translations say.
 * Arabic makes my head hurt lol... Over here, the PC police would call that cultural appropriation and yell at her to change her shirt. They got mad at one of the Kardashians for wearing a Native American headdress, and Katy Perry for using Egyptian imagery in some music video. The people here who claim to be against racism are the most wildly racist people I've ever encountered. —  [Ric Laurent] — 23:22, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

 * Yeah I've encountered those people online. Their rationale is that "racism = prejudice + power", so it's impossible to be racist against the culturally dominant group. I'm always surprised that none of them have come over here yet and wanted to delete all the racist words and change the "racism" page. Equinox ◑ 23:31, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

 * Most such people aren't smart enough to be interested in an online dictionary. —  [Ric Laurent] — 23:32, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

אפה
What's this about? Please don't do it again. --WikiTiki89 18:33, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

 * I don't like rhetorical questions. —  [Ric Laurent] — 19:31, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
 * I didn't even mean it as rhetorical. I'm curious what point you were trying to make. --WikiTiki89 01:58, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

 * I wasn't trying to make a point. —  [Ric Laurent] — 02:42, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Sh'va na.
Why are you removing the apostrophe denoting sh'va na? —Ruakh TALK 22:44, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

 * Where? I thought I'd only removed silent ones. —  [Ric Laurent] — 22:52, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

 * Well, shof'tím, for example, has a sh'va na. It's "silent", yes, in that the ordinary Modern pronunciation is /shofˈtim/ rather than /sho.fəˈtim/, but grammatically it's a sh'va na. You can tell this by examining the same form for a word with a begedkefet consonant in the position of the tet: gon'vím, for example, or som'khím. Although we say /gonˈvim/ and /somˈχim/, with just two syllables, in ordinary Modern Hebrew, you can tell that it's a sh'va na, because a sh'va nakh would trigger a dagesh kal, hence gonbím or somkím. Do you see what I mean? —Ruakh TALK 06:37, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

 * Sort of but not entirely :D The rules of sh'va hurt my brain. —  [Ric Laurent] — 10:53, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

 * It may help to view the traditional sh'va na/nakh distinction as completely separate from the ordinary Modern rules about when sh'va is pronounced and when it is silent. They are similar in that they both have a phonological component and a morphological component; and they're related in that a traditional sh'va nakh almost always remains silent in ordinary Modern pronunciation (with some exceptions, e.g. verb forms like avádta /aˈva.də.ta/ "you worked" where an epenthetic schwa now separates a dalet belonging to the root from a tav belonging to the ending); but the differences are great enough that I think it would be easier to take each system on its own terms than to try to view one as a modification of the other. —Ruakh TALK 06:48, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

 * Oh I know they're distinct, and I do try to keep the fact in mind while I edit. I just haven't studied the traditional rules enough to know with perfect certainty where they differ in practice. Eventually I'm going to have to learn them, but I've given up on the idea of Wiktionary ever being a truly useful and reliable resource, so my motivation to be perfect isn't what it used to be. I pretty much only edit now for my own benefit. —  [Ric Laurent] — 12:36, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Category:Turkish form-of templates to be deleted
These have been sitting around for a year now because no one who cares knows enough about Turkish to figure out how to orphan them. These were created by Sae1962, who speaks Turkish, but apparently was born without any common sense or sense of proportion (I suspect he has a drawer for socks he wears on Thursdays...)

At the time we discussed it in RFDO, all the other Turkish editors we could get hold of agreed that they were unnecessary and excessive. I orphaned a bunch of them by switching to and  so none of the information would be lost until someone who knew Turkish could take a look at them. But then CodeCat objected on the grounds that some of the inflectional information didn't look right, and only someone who knew what they were doing should work on the entries- which nobody has.

So, I was wondering if you might take a look at the entries in these categories and see if it's something you might want to work on. I know you're busy, what with KORUPPTING AMERIKAS YUTH and torturing furry things with blunt kitchen utensils <tt>;)</tt>, but I'd appreciate at least some advice on what to do with these. Thanks! Chuck Entz (talk) 02:51, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

 * So a few things.
 * 1) I might know enough Turkish to do this, but I don't actually care about Wiktionary, so your search for someone in the middle of that Venn continues.
 * 2) Fuck CodeCat.
 * 3) I'm a much better influence on Amerika's yuth than probably 90+% of everything else they come in contact with. They'd do well to hang with me. —  [Ric Laurent] — 08:59, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. As to 1): I still do, in spite of numerous reasons not to, so I thought I'd ask. As to 2): your attitude is understandable, given your past interactions, even if I don't share it. As to 3): that's not saying much. I subscribe to traditional morality (minus the homophobic stuff), but I don't believe in forcing it on others or condemning people for stuff that's not hurting anybody. I'm sure you're decent enough in real life, in spite of your cantankerous and morally-contrarian online persona. Chuck Entz (talk) 15:03, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

 * 1) You're a smart guy, you'll get over it sooner or later -- the more you sincerely care now, the sooner it will be; 2) [numerous misdirected verbal abuses proactively redacted]; 3) What tradition? Despite what's commonly believed, even by self-described traditional people, traditional morality is not all alike. I'm also a "traditionally moral" person. In practice, I'm just wow v odd rn much tbh. My only genuine contrarianisms are geared toward making smart people think smarter. Most of the time I'm just being a goofball, a pervert, or embarrassingly lax on my standards for treating people with patience and hesed. I'm in no way, using my own personally understood definitions of both words, morally "progressive" or "contrarian." (I include the former as an added dynamic context; hopefully it will make all this rambling more understandable. Shut up, I'm trying to get drunk.) —  [Ric Laurent] — 16:09, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Lo siento
I’m sorry that I rudely told you to grow up, openly insulted your writing, and pestered you on your talk page a while back. I don’t always find everything you do or say to be…erm…agreeable, but I should have been more mature by keeping my unrequested hostile opinions to myself. --Romanophile (talk) 01:18, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

 * So I don't know what you're talking about, which indicates to me that it's clearly not a big deal. I know I'm a shit head, don't feel bad. —  [Ric Laurent] — 16:24, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

title: User talk:Qehath/Archive 2013-4


text: apátságba

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: apátságba


text:
Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2015-05/User:Kephir for de-sysop

User:Kephir for de-sysop

 * Vote starts: 14:07, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Vote ends: 23:59, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Rationale
I believe this user lacks the competence to adequately serve as an administrator. He clearly holds a grudge against a number of editors (User:Purplebackpack89 being chief among them, and User:Dan Polansky to a lesser extent). That grudge manifests itself in the HOUNDing of those users' edits, a form of harassment that gets in the way of their right to edit. He has misused his administrator privileges on a number of occasions; other times he has edited in ways that would have gotten other editors blocked. There are several ways that Kephir's actions are particularly inappropriate:

 * 1) Using his administrator tools against edits with whom he disagree (particularly blocking those editors without giving them talk page access, generally a no-no on most unilateral blocks, but a particular issue with people he disagrees with).
 * 2) Taking excessive administrative actions that have to be undone by other administrators.
 * 3) Having inappropriate rationale he uses for taking admin actions (for example, deleting a talk page edit using an mainspace rationale), or trumped-up (for example, claiming a user was edit-warring with a single edit, deleting good-faith edits as vandalism, or claiming a clearly-labelled non-secure connection alternate account as sockpuppetry).
 * 4) Making excessive and controversial changes to protected and high-profile pages
 * 5) Failure to be responsive to criticisms on talk pages

Here are a number of edits I believe to be inappropriate and/or misuse of tools.
 * May 20, 2015 Blocking an editor for six months without talk page access on the slimmest of pretenses
 * The block was undone within five minutes with the rationale "making up imaginary rules to ban people you don't like? seriously?"
 * December, 2014 Blocking an editor for a month with no talk page access after quarrelling with that editor
 * When undone an hour later, another admin called it One of the most abusive blocks I've seen on Wiktionary."
 * Then blocking that user's non-secure alt acct, which was clearly labelled as such, indefinitely
 * Was undone by another admin
 * Edit-warring over collapsing a Beer parlour discussion about himself
 * Closing a discussion that he himself was the subject of
 * Controversial indef-block without talk page access of an editor with whom he had quarrelled
 * The block was reduced to one month within 24 hours
 * (diff provided by User:Dan Polansky)
 * Was undone by another admin within a few hours.
 * Removal of another editor's comments on a community noticeboard
 * Removing another editor's good-faith edits to a community noticeboard
 * Removing another editor's talk page edits on a third editor's page
 * 06:29, November 28, 2014: Inappropriate deletion rationale
 * 10:12, November 28, 2014: Inappropriate deletion rationale
 * 14:08, November 18, 2014: Inappropriate deletion rationale
 * Inappropriate deletion rationale: Claiming a good-faith edit was vandalism
 * Calling another editor a "lying, illiterate troll
 * Taking away the whitelist rights of an editor with whom he quarrelled
 * This occurred in violation of a consensus not to remove the rights
 * The rights were restored within two hours.

I also believe the user does not listen to other editors. As noted, a number of inappropriate comments were deletion of talk page threads as vandalism. Other times, he has deleted talk page comments using rationale that are supposed to be only used for entries. If this user considers talk page comments vandalism, it's clear he is not listening to concerns of other editors. This is not appropriate. He has deleted everything one user has posted on his talk since August (usually tagging it as vandalism), while leaving things other users say intact. While deleting comments is technically not a policy violation, it is highly discouraged, particularly since admins are supposed to listen.

 * Pur ple back pack 89  14:07, 20 May 2015 (UTC)            Verify that your "E-mail this user" link works, and uncomment this section. -->

Support

 * 1)   Pur ple back pack 89   14:08, 20 May 2015 (UTC) 14:07, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 2)  and have CodeCat be next. -- Liliana • 14:10, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 3)  The granting of admin privileges is, at its core, an act of trust. It means we are giving someone greater power because we trust them to use it wisely. We hold admins to a higher standard for a reason. Tools are meant to help one enforce Wiktionary's policies and protect it from vandalism. They are not meant to help one gain an upper hand in a personal dispute with another user. When admins cross that line, they need to be held accountable. Otherwise the trust we place in admins is meaningless. -Cloudcuckoolander (talk) 16:59, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 4)  --Dan Polansky (talk) His recent deletion of posts to his talk page and the entirely inappropriate block of Purplebackpack for 6 months on 20 May 2015 (block log) is part of a long-term pattern, as documented on this vote page. His indef against me from 2014 was clear harassment in gross violation of WT:BLOCK. His open declarations of stances against the principle of consensus (e.g. ) are inappropriate for an admin. If he needs to edit some module pages, their protection level should be lowered; since CodeCat (an admin) can edit them, they are exposed to untested changes anyway, and their protection to be editable only by admins serves no useful purpose. I opposed his nomination at Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2013-12/User:Kephir for admin, and he turned out to be much worse than I imagined. --Dan Polansky (talk) 20:56, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1)  Bad faith nomination. It seems that Purplebackpack has some kind of personal vendetta against Kephir, singling him out and treating everything he does as some kind of personal attack on him. —CodeCat 14:18, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 2)  --Daniel 14:27, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 3)  Just quit pestering him already. And don’t subtract CodeCat’s privileges either. --Romanophile (talk) 14:32, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 4) . — Ungoliant (falai) 15:48, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 5)  The only thing that's a major issue is that Kephir really shouldn't be blocking people he's in a dispute with, but otherwise this looks like the regular witch-hunt. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 18:09, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I see, so Kephir grossly abuses his admin privileges by blocking people he is in dispute with for rigiculous amounts of time, but otherwise the vote intended to limit that looks like a witch-hunt. Can anyone clarify the logic of the above statement to me, if any? --Dan Polansky (talk) 21:10, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I echo what Dan said. People have talked to Kephir about this in the past and yet he continues to make poor use of his tools.  We have a limited number of tools available to us on this project for dealing with this problem.  If talking to him doesn't get him to stop and we're not willing to take away his tools, what's going to prevent him from doing this again, to me, Dan or anybody else? Pur ple back pack 89   21:35, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Personally, I think some of the stuff other admins here have done is far worse, and yet nobody suggests desysopping them, so yeah, that makes this a witch-hunt. And I wish you guys would stop pretending that you're innocent. PBP, you've been blocked by five different admins by my count, and Dan, it seems you've been blocked by six. These are for disruptive edits and other documented offences going back years, and Dan has also fallen afoul of the admins on Czech Wiktionary. So it seems that you both have a history of getting yourselves blocked, but instead want to remove Kephir's rights by making him seem like a rogue sysop who's out to get you. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 22:50, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 * You've left a lot of questions unanswered, User:Metaknowledge. If Kephir isn't out to get me, why do his blocks always occur after he and I interact?  Also, if I'm such a bad editor, why is it that I have never been blocked for a duration of longer than 3 days?  And why has Kephir been the only person since last June to block me?  If Kephir's blocks are appropriate, why are they undone within a few hours?  What made them appropriate in the first place?  Since you're a mop, why didn't you block me or Dan?  What about the other stuff Kephir has done other than bad blocks?  And why do other editors' misdeeds matter at all to this discussion?  Just because they've done wrong things doesn't mean Kephir gets a free pass. Pur ple back pack 89   23:26, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 * (responding to Metaknowledge post) It would be fair to say that, before the Kephir block, there were four blocks against me, of which one was legitimate, the Ruakh's one, for a mistake my AWB regex made when I was using AWB. Three of the four blocks were very short; the long one lasted week and its summary included "Violating WT:AGF+WT:BLOCK", which is an obvious nonsense since I am not an admin, have no blocking tools and thus cannot violate WT:BLOCK; this -sche block was questioned by multiple editors. Kephir set the precedent for ridiculous vendetta blocks that helped set the tone for further blocks that followed. His action has a lasting impact; one editor in the Czech Wiktionary keeps on repeating that I was indef blocked in the English Wiktionary, not caring about the details. Obviously, this is very personal to me. I feel grossly abused by that indef block, and I wish the abuser to have the sysop tools removed as the least measure; if someone proposed banning Kephir from this wiki, I would not oppose. --Dan Polansky (talk) 15:58, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 1)  --Vahag (talk) 18:41, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 2)  This isn't the auto-opposition to anything that Purple does; I really think Kephir mostly makes good decisions, and it would be   a loss to the project to "de-sysop" him. Equinox ◑ 23:47, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The thing is is that he's made a number of ridiculously poor decisions as far as I and Dan are concerned. What's going to prevent him from making more, if you don't want either the de-sysop or the interaction ban?  Pur ple back pack 89   23:54, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Hopefully the fact that this vote has been raised at all, and some users are supporting it, will raise a red flag...? I still hope it won't pass. Equinox ◑ 23:56, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 1)  de-sysopping, but I'd support an interaction ban of the kind proposed by bd2412 in his post in  (timestamped: 20:27, 20 May 2015). — I.S.M.E.T.A. 21:03, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
 * @I.S.M.E.T.A., thanks - I have proposed this solution at Beer parlour/2015/May Cheers! bd2412 T 03:52, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 1)  Looking at the actions that Purplebackpack89 links to, I feel that many of them are largely or entirely justified; and most of the rest are very understandable, at least. —Ruakh TALK 06:19, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
 * @Ruakh: Let's consider the blocks at User:Purplebackpackonthetrail: are they justified or are they understandable? To me, they appear to be neither. They seem to be pure harassment, with false blocking rationale "Abusing multiple accounts". --Dan Polansky (talk) 06:48, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I believe that PBP is a troll here, and is a prime example of that. (Did you notice that its user-page is carefully crafted to pretend that this is Wikipedia? That is not an isolated thing; rather, PBP has a long history of linking to Wikipedia policy pages, accusing other editors of violating Wikipedia policies, referring to Wiktionary pages by the names of their Wikipedia analogues, and so on. (S)he has certainly observed that Wiktionarians find this annoying — we've made no secret of it — but (s)he declines to care.) And the trolling has not been harmless. So, frankly, I find harassment of PBP to be pretty understandable, as long as it's not taken to extremes. (But unfortunately, the harassment does not seem to have been effective, since PBP is still here, and (naturally) still trolling.) —Ruakh TALK 07:33, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
 * If he bothers you lot so much—and I’m quite sure that he does—why not get rid of him? His workload is usually small anyway. --Romanophile (talk) 07:49, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
 * But unfortunately, the harassment does not seem to have been effective - What's next? Death threats? Murder? -- Liliana • 15:14, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm guessing you missed the part, or are pretending to have missed the part, where I said "as long as it's not taken to extremes"? (I mean, I suppose there's another possible explanation for your comment, namely that you don't consider death threats and murder to be extreme, or that you don't think I do; but I think that one is too far-fetched to be taken seriously.) —Ruakh TALK 06:29, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The reason my alt account uses a Wikipedia template is that no Wiktionary template exists for that purpose. As for the trolling claim,
 * a) I'm pretty clearly not a troll.
 * b) It's not polite to call people trolls.
 * c) It's not acceptable to harass other editors, even trolls.
 * d) Kephir has clearly taken things "to extremes"
 * As for the claim that I care nothing for Wiktionary policy and only for Wikipedia policy; if you look at my edits over the last 6-9 months, you'll find virtually all of them compliant with Wiktionary policy. But I do believe that it would be beneficial for Wiktionary's policies to be closer to Wikipedia's.  There's nothing inherently wrong with that belief.  And you act like I take that position solely to piss off other editors; I take it because I believe the differences to be confusing, and the rationales for the differences to be weak.  You shouldn't block somebody on belief.  And you shouldn't call me a troll. Pur ple back pack 89   16:23, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Perhaps you need to elaborate which you think are largely and entirely justified, because I'm not seeing any. What's the justification in blocking Dan or I without talk page access, especially when done unilaterally and because of comments directed at the talk page?  Those blocks were clearly over-the-line; why do you think they were undone within 24 hours? What's the justification in being wholly uncooperative on your talk page for almost a year; tagging every comment as vandalism?  Admins need to be able to be communicated with? And what's the justification in reverting comments made on a third user's talk page (i.e. not Kephir's; not Dan's or mine)?  There's no reason whatsoever for doing that, as the comments clearly weren't vandalism.  Kephir has made no secret that one of his primary goals here is to get me and Dan indeffed, and he's been bending and breaking rules left and right to try and make that a reality.  Since his bending and breaking of rules have included misusing his tools, so he should forfeit them. Pur ple back pack 89   14:16, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Not to mention that you left Wiktionary because of CodeCat's complete ignorance of basic rules of interaction. Why is it a breach of rules in that case, but perfectly okay when Purplebackpack89 is involved? Double standards much? -- Liliana • 16:31, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I . . . what? What are you referring to? I'm pretty sure I've never voted to de-sysop CodeCat? —Ruakh TALK 07:33, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
 * You were clearly upset that CodeCat was harassing you. Is it not acceptable for me and Dan to be upset that Kephir is harassing us?  And how would you have reacted if an admin tagged all comments you made on their page as vandalism, then slapped a block with no talk page access on you? Pur ple back pack 89   16:23, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I could never replace Ruakh, but I’d still like to add this: Even if I didn’t respect his boundaries, I would understand that I am causing him annoyance by continually pestering him, since he has already made his sentiments clear. If anything, that constitutes harassment. This vote is only going to increase animosity, not just between you two but also between you and the community. If I were you, I’d try to stay out of the site politics for a while (but I wouldn’t be surprised if you ignored my suggestion). --Romanophile (talk) 22:59, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 1)  DCDuring TALK  16:32, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Abstain

 * 1)  Kephir is a valuable admin and taking away his ability to edit protected pages will hurt Wiktionary. However, although I sympathized at first with his intolerance of a particular editor (who should not have been the one to create this vote), deleting comments and issuing blocks for starting discussions is immature and unacceptable behavior for an admin. --WikiTiki89 15:35, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 * , and alternately propose an interaction ban between them. bd2412 T 20:27, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) . From glancing through the history I'm bound to agree that Kephir's behaviour is not acceptable. Nevertheless votes of this kind are not very helpful either except when the nominator is a disinterested party, which is clearly not the case here. Ƿidsiþ 12:11, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) . This vote has no legitimacy as it was started prematurely and by a nondisinterested party. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 20:56, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I see no problem with a party repeatedly abused by Kephir starting this vote. If someone robs my house, and I file a complaint, I don't expect the police to tell me off as a "nondisinterested party". You should have complained to Kephir when he was the "nondisinterested" party issuing grossly unjust blocks. --Dan Polansky (talk) 15:31, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I'd also contest "prematurely". This wasn't some whim vote.  It was months in the making and done only after other methods of redress had failed. Pur ple back pack 89   18:38, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) . I am unimpressed with the behavior of several different parties in this issue. This line of discussion, however, does not seem fruitful. — JohnC5 22:01, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Discussion

 * I would suggest that this proposal is counterproductive, in that a voting page is hardly ever a good place to undertake dispute resolution. We don't have an arbitration committee, but perhaps an ad hoc group could be formed for the purposes of looking into the dispute between Kephir and Purplebackpack89 and then proposing an informed and impartial resolution to the community. - TheDaveRoss 15:46, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 * There is no evidence to support the above claims, AFAIK. An admin who frivolously deletes posts from his talk page should not even be taken to a dispute resolution; they should be desysopped on sight. This vote is the best mechanism that we have, so far as I know. I do not see what makes this vote "counterproductive", meaning producing the opposite of its intended effect; do you suggest that, as a result of this vote, Kephir behavior gets even worse? --Dan Polansky (talk) 21:00, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 * That is exactly what I am saying. The evidence is in all other similar votes which I can recall, this isn't the first instance where a request for de-sysop has been made due to claims of harassment.  I have been out of Wiktionary politics for too long to dredge up the specifics, but I am sure Connel had a similar vote against him at least once, possibly even SemperBlotto, although that might not have gotten to a vote.  I say these are counterproductive because there is no chance of positive outcome.  One possible outcome is that the vote passes.  In that case Kephir will not be able to delete pages or block people, which you think is a win.  It doesn't resolve the interpersonal dispute, and very likely it will just lead to more acrimony between those who already think Kephir is misbehaving and those who think this is a witch hunt.  If the vote fails (which they always have) then those who support the vote are likely to add those who oppose to the list of people they think are out to get them.  This vote is divisive, and it is not a good forum for building consensus or resolution.  You may be right that Kephir shouldn't be an admin, they may be misusing the tools in a way which is deleterious to the project.  You may also be wrong.  I don't think a popular vote is a practical method of arriving at a decision in these sorts of matters. - TheDaveRoss 12:05, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I know of Wiktionary:Votes/2008-02/Reprimand of User:Connel MacKenzie, and, from what I can see, the reprimand vote suggesting a block for one day, although it did not pass, achieved what it intended to achieve: reduce certain behavior on the part of Connel. It did so at a cost of losing Connel, which is to be admitted. Thus, as for efficacy, this is one piece of evidence that votes can limit undesirable behaviors, especially if they are full of discussion as the reprimand vote was. --Dan Polansky (talk) 17:41, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
 * User:TheDaveRoss, This goes back to the question, "what are you going to do to stop Kephir's behavior?" Even if the vote fails, it's possible that a majority of people will still find his actions unacceptable.  If this is a bad move, what is the better move to stop Kephir making bad blocks and deleting comments? Pur ple back pack 89   13:46, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
 * What am I going to do? Nothing.  I don't have a dog in this hunt, I am merely suggesting that this course of action is not of use.  I also proposed what I think would be a better course of action, that is some form of arbitration.  The results of arbitration are less subject to popularity and personal bias, assuming the arbitrators are well chosen. - TheDaveRoss 18:03, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

 * People have tried talking to Kephir, and he hasn't listened. You can try it again if you want, but it won't do any good.  Pur ple back pack 89   21:39, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 * If you leave Kephir alone, he will leave you alone. It's always you that starts these incidents by posting on multiple talk pages as soon as you don't like something. You are not an admin (and for good reason) and 99% of the times that you started a dispute with an admin, they were right and you were wrong. When someone reverts you, just take the message and stop complaining. --WikiTiki89 15:30, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
 * "Complaining" is too loaded a word; a better word would be "commenting". Commenting on Kephir's talk page, or on any other talk page or Wiktionary-space page, does no harm, and it is still ridiculous for Kephir (or anybody else) to block me (or anybody else) for it.  Neither I nor anybody else should be bullied by Kephir into not commenting just because he throws around bullshit blocks on the slimmest of pretences.  The problem is not my comments, the problem here is Kephir's bullshit blocks.  My commenting on Kephir's page doesn't prevent his editing of knickerbocker glory or cheese curl or any other pages; his bullshit blocks do. Pur ple back pack 89   16:06, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I was actually referring to these sorts of complaints that you post on as many talk pages as you can think of. --WikiTiki89 17:17, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
 * What is a comment in your mind might be continued harassment to Kephir's. You can't assume that your point of view of this situation is the only valid one. That's why this vote isn't getting the support you might have expected; other editors are seeing perspectives that you don't. From Kephir's point of view, a block for ongoing harassment might be perfectly reasonable, even if you don't see it that way. —CodeCat 16:27, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
 * It's not reasonable, CodeCat. Full stop.  Kephir himself shouldn't have done the block.  Especially since there shouldn't be a block.  I don't think you're considering the inverse of the situation.  If you consider my comments to be harassment (which they clearly aren't, FWIW), what's to stop any editor from unilaterallly declaring any other editor's comments on his page harassment?  And then, if he's an admin, blocking that person? Pur ple back pack 89   16:36, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Nothing is stopping any editor from doing anything the software allows them to. Only consensus among editors can decide if those actions are appropriate or not, and what to do if they aren't. You haven't actually sought out such a consensus at all; what you've done is unilaterally decide that Kephir must be in the wrong and you must be right, and that he must therefore be desysopped without question. And you see the result: there is no consensus for your proposed action. But you skipped the first step here: finding out whether his actions were appropriate or not by consensus, and only then should you have considered possible measures such as a vote. Votes don't make consensus, they only codify it. —CodeCat 16:53, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
 * If you think this is a unilateral process,, then you are much mistaken. I have been exploring this for months, and not alone.  Dan has been consulted on it for awhile, and I've literally have people pop out of the woodwork and beg me to start this vote.  As for putting the cart before the horse, a) if Kephir was right to block me, he wouldn't have been undone so quickly, and b) if I'd started a BP thread about it, you and others would have ignored it and accused me of drama-mongering. Pur ple back pack 89   17:07, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Re: "Votes don't make consensus, they only codify it.": Not really. Consensus (general agreement) is a factual state of affairs; votes help detect its presence. There is no better and more reliable method for the detection of consensus than votes. There was no need to take this to Beer parlour; the misbehavior of Kephir was generally known, and multiple people raised their objections to it at User_talk:Kephir (a discussion from December 2014). This vote will help clarify how many people confirm that Kephir's behavior is objectionable, and how much. Those who vote support probably see it as rather severe; those who abstain probably acknowledge that there is some problem but not all that serious one. We would never know what editors think about the matter for so many editors if it were not for the vote. --Dan Polansky (talk) 17:41, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Decision

 * The vote fails 4-10-5 and User:Kephir remains a sysop. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 20:45, 5 June 2015 (UTC)


text:
-barát

Suffix

 * 1)  -friendly accommodating to the interests, expectations, demands of someone or something
 * 2)  -friendly safer, less damaging, less hazardous
 * 1)  -friendly safer, less damaging, less hazardous

Usage notes
The following terms derive from the noun (as they don’t mean being friendly towards someone or something):, , , , , and. The terms, , and are traditionally derived from the noun even if they are (or may be) construed with the sense “-friendly”.

title: -barát


text:
ציִען

Etymology
From, from , from , from , from. Compare 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1) to pull

title: ציִען


text:
Mĩ Tho

Etymology
From +  +, literally "land of white girls". The first element was somehow dropped.

Proper noun

 * , the
 * , the
 * , the

title: Mĩ Tho


text: Mỹ Tho

title: Mỹ Tho


text:
appenden

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to belong

title: appenden


text: געבליט

title: געבליט


text:
gazella

Noun

 * 1) gazelle

Etymology
Ultimately from, probably via a Romance language, e.g. 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1)  gazelle

title: gazella


text:
señero

Etymology
, from, from. .

Adjective

 * 1) unique
 * 2)  lone, alone, solitary
 * 1)  lone, alone, solitary

title: señero


text: señeros

title: señeros


text: Category:hu:Antelopes

title: Category:hu:Antelopes


text:
תשומת לב

Noun

 * 1) attention, interest

title: תשומת לב


text:
User talk:Ricoramiro

Hi, this is my page. Please be sure to stop by and say hi. My blog is called trying to change my life.

title: User talk:Ricoramiro


text: birtokolnak

title: birtokolnak


text: שיבלת

title: שיבלת


text: שבלת

title: שבלת


text:
sin par

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1)  one-of-a-kind, unparalleled, peerless, unique

title: sin par


text:
шарғылақ

Noun

 * 1) polecat

title: шарғылақ


text:
בלעך

Etymology
From, from , from , from. Compare 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) tin element
 * 2) sheet metal, tin sheet
 * 3)  blech
 * 1)  blech

title: בלעך


text:
גאָלדבערג

Proper noun

 * : Goldberg

title: גאָלדבערג


text:
take the gilt off the gingerbread

Etymology
In the Middle Ages, gingerbread cakes were decorated with a thin layer of gold leaf. Without this casing, they were considered to be humble offerings, generally being little more than flavoured but stale bread.

Verb

 * 1)  To take away the most attractive or appealing qualities of something; to destroy an illusion.

Translations

 * Finnish: tehdä vähemmän houkutteleva, romuttaa kuvitelmat

title: take the gilt off the gingerbread


text: niquità

title: niquità


text: nissuno

title: nissuno


text:
nitriera

Noun

 * 1) nitrary

title: nitriera


text:
nitroglicol

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  nitroglycol

Noun

 * 1) nitroglycol

title: nitroglicol


text:
nitroglycol

Noun

 * 1)  The nitrate of ethylene glycol (ethylene glycol dinitrate) that is an explosive similar in properties to nitroglycerine

Translations

 * Italian: nitroglicol

title: nitroglycol


text: nittalope

title: nittalope


text: nittalopia

title: nittalopia


text:
noachide

Adjective

 * 1) Noahide

Noun

 * 1) Noahide

title: noachide


text:
Thread:User talk:TheDaveRoss/Kephir dispute resolution

What has to happen is there needs to be some guarantee that Kephir won't keep bullshit blocking me and removing content I make on third-party pages, at least without harsh penalties. At present, the only rules-based way to prevent an admin from blocking an editor is to take away his tools. FWIW, the decision to start this discussion didn't start in a vacuum...I've been working on it for months, and not alone.


text: flaskák

title: flaskák


text:
kofaktor

Noun

 * 1)  cofactor

title: kofaktor


text:
Template talk:hot word

Template:hot word
I disagree with this. Let this thing created on 6 March 2014 be deleted unless there is consensus to keep it: no consensus => status quo ante. --Dan Polansky (talk) 20:33, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
 * As above, there was a large amount of consensus for it and very little opposition at the BP discussion. --WikiTiki89 20:41, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep both. If we are to include widely publicised protologisms, as has been the consensus at WT:RFD and WT:RFV, we should tag them as such instead of pretending they are in clearly widespread use. — Ungoliant (falai) 21:24, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I've removed the RFD nomination from the template. It's very clear that this is being discussed in the BP, so RFDing it is only going to annoy people and serves no purpose other than to be obstructive. 21:26, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I agree with CodeCat's action; let's keep discussion in one forum (in this case, the BP). - -sche (discuss) 22:08, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep, at least for now. DCDuring TALK 22:19, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

 * Keep, but reduce to a tiny, barely noticeable sliver of its current form, per the BP proposal. bd2412 T 16:01, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep, but only in reduced form as in User:Cloudcuckoolander's flamelet version. DCDuring TALK 16:31, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
 * For reference, here is the User:Cloudcuckoolander flamelet version posted to Beer parlour:
 * FireIcon.svg This English term is a hot word. Its inclusion on Wiktionary is provisional.
 * --Dan Polansky (talk) 19:11, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I've stricken these nominations as they can't be addressed as long as there is still a discussion about it on the BP. See also my statement above. In any case, judging from this discussion, the current one on the BP, and also the one last month, it appears there is no consensus for anything but keeping the templates, and the current discussion is only about what they look like, which is not a matter for RFDO. 19:18, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
 * And if anyone doesn't like nominations being stricken like that, then I'll just say I'm closing this debate with a clear keep as the result. 19:24, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Unstriking as pending resolution of BP. No apparent consensus to keep. Excessively interested party ought not to closing this matter. DCDuring TALK 21:06, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Then where are the delete votes? Where are the objections to the template when it was created last month? I see none, except Dan Polansky's. That's a pretty clear snowball "keep" in my eyes. If you dispute that, I'd really love to know what arguments there are for that. 21:11, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete in their current forms. That's one. I viewed BD's "Keep" as the same. Clearly the author of a template can have impaired judgment when it comes to the author's own creation, hence the good practice of not having such a person close out such matters. DCDuring TALK 21:24, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm going to invoke WT:NPA here. I feel you're doing this more to annoy me and/or be obstructive to make a point, than because it is actually reasonable to. 21:29, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I can't accept responsibility for your feelings. Perhaps you might consider lying down until the feeling goes away. DCDuring TALK 19:53, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Ugliness of the template is addressed by editing it, not by deleting it. You really are being obstructive to make a point here. (Although I agree that it is not CodeCat who should be closing this vote.) — Keφr 05:29, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I am concerned about misconstrual of the closing of such a vote, which misconstrual has some precedents. DCDuring TALK 13:53, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

 * Keep: per discussion at the BP discussion Purplebackpack89  (Notes Taken) (Locker) 18:26, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep, but only if we come up with some less vague criteria about which terms are eligible for "hot word" status. Two recently started WT:RFVs suggest that we might be too eager to grant this status to neologisms, which is what DP has been worrying about (presumably; he never actually stated a reason for opposing this). — Keφr 05:29, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Which two recently started RFVs?--Prosfilaes (talk) 18:22, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
 * and . I think "hot word" status should be restricted to terms whose referents have been recently discovered/established and/or for which citations of usage (not necessarily durable) have been shown to exist in a wide range of media; this would include, , , new senses of and maybe , but not  or . — Keφr 19:02, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep; what the template looks like is not relevant to a deletion discussion.--Prosfilaes (talk) 18:22, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
 * RFDO kept: no consensus for deletion. --Dan Polansky (talk) 11:10, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

title: Template talk:hot word


text:
koenzim

Noun

 * 1)  coenzyme

title: koenzim


text: koenzimek

title: koenzimek


text:
rozumieť

Etymology
.

Verb

 * 1)  to understand

Derived terms

 * dorozumieť sa
 * dorozumieť sa

title: rozumieť


text:
שמירת הלשון

Etymology
+, literally "guarding of the tongue".

Noun

 * 1)  shmirat halashon/shmiras haloshon

title: שמירת הלשון


text: שמירת

title: שמירת


text:
incumprimento

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) non-fulfilment

title: incumprimento


text:
Citations:singsongingly

Adverb: "in a singsonging manner"

 * 1960, Peter Martin, The Building, Little, Brown (1960), page 76:
 * "Oh," Paul said singsongingly, to the point of satire, "is that the guy who has heard of evolution and remains unimpressed?"
 * 1998, Antonya Nelson, Nobody's Girl, Scribner (1998), ISBN 9780684839325, page 235:
 * "That's right, Miz Stone," he said singsongingly without turning from his chore.
 * 1998, Lawrence Schimel & Martin H. Greenberg, Camelot Fantastic, Daw books (1998), ISBN 9780886777906, page 230:
 * "A phil-o-soph-er!" cried the Morgana, singsongingly.
 * 2011, Jane Borden, I Totally Meant to Do That, Broadway Paperbacks (2011), ISBN 9780307464637, :
 * “I’m so glad”, she replies. Then she pauses, allowing me a few precious seconds with the item before singsongingly adding, “OK, darlin’: Now wrap it up and hand it back.”

title: Citations:singsongingly


text:
Citations:hyperchondriac

 * 2009, Frank Forencich, Exuberant Animal: The Power of Health, Play and Joyful Movement, AuthorHouse, ISBN 9781425956639, :
 * We all know how hypochondriacs think and behave–a mortal illness embedded in every meal and a fatal prognosis in every sensation–but how would a hyperchondriac think and behave? ¶ Just imagine the difference. Where the hypochondriac sees only threats and degeneration, the hyperchondriac sees only benefits and potential pleasures. Where the hypochondriac sees only danger, the hyperchondriac sees only opportunity. Thy hypochondriac is a psychosomatic pessimist, but the hyperchondriac is a psychosomatic optimist.

title: Citations:hyperchondriac


text: lemondott

title: lemondott


text:
pracinha

Noun

 * 1) a member of the  of World War II

title: pracinha


text:
intrafaith

Adjective

 * 1) Taking place within, or relevant to, a single faith community.

title: intrafaith


text:
烏魯木斉

Etymology
The kanji are,.

title: 烏魯木斉


text: ウルムチ

title: ウルムチ


text: Urumuchi

title: Urumuchi


text:
Gottscheerish

Etymology
Borrowed from. See, region in southern Slovenia.

Proper noun

 * 1) The Germanic lect (sometimes considered an independent language and sometimes considered a dialect of Bavarian) historically used by the Gottscheers in the enclave of Gottschee, Slovenia, now little spoken.

Translations

 * German:
 * Gottscheerish: Göttscheabarisch
 * Slovene: kočevarščina

title: Gottscheerish


text: Gottscheerisch

title: Gottscheerisch


text: showzinho

title: showzinho


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 魯

title: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 魯


text:
menemukan

Etymology
Affixed.

Verb

 * 1) to find, to locate, to detect
 * 2) to discover
 * 3) to invent
 * 1) to invent

title: menemukan


text:
Citations:Granish

the Carniolan language (depending on context, either Slovene or Gottscheerisch)

 * (from )

 * 1971, Hearings, Reports and Prints of the [United States] Senate Committee on Labor and Public Welfare, subsection on the United Mine Workers' Election, page 389:
 * Senator Williams. What language were they talking in?
 * Mr. Zmuda. They would usually talk mostly Granish down there and I understand. It is pretty hard for me to understand but I am familiar.
 * Senator Williams. Spanish?
 * Mr. Zmuda. Granish.
 * Senator Williams. What was he talking in Granish to the [interrupted]
 * Mr. Zmuda. Some of these old fellows would not understand the names, you know, and he would read them off and then he would tell them who he wanted them to vote for.
 * Mr. Zmuda. Some of these old fellows would not understand the names, you know, and he would read them off and then he would tell them who he wanted them to vote for.

mention-y citation of a reference

 * 2008, Encyclopedia of the World's Endangered Languages ISBN 1135796408:
 * Gottscheerish (also called Granish)

title: Citations:Granish


text:
вучыцца

Etymology
From, from and , from  and. Cognate with 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1)  to learn, to study

title: вучыцца


text:
Gottscheer

Etymology
Either from or simply.

Noun

 * 1) One of the Germanic inhabitants of Gottschee, or one of their descendants.

Translations

 * German:
 * Gottscheerish: Göttscheabar

title: Gottscheer


text: Gottscheers

title: Gottscheers


text: Wiktionary:Foreign Word of the Day/2015/May 21


text:
Gottschee

Etymology
From, first mentioned in 1363 as. Compare the Slovenian name.

Proper noun

 * 1)  which was historically inhabited by the Germanic Gottscheers who spoke Gottscheerish.
 * , the main city of this region.

Translations

 * German:
 * Slovene: Kočevsko

 * German:
 * Gottscheerish: Gotscheab, Göttscheab
 * Italian: Cocevie
 * Slovene: Kočevje

title: Gottschee


text:
Thread:User talk:TheDaveRoss/Kephir dispute resolution/reply

I understand that there are some interpersonal issues going on, and as with all things there are various points of view. What I am saying is that punitive votes have very rarely (if ever) succeeded, and if you actually want an outcome which resolves anything a vote is probably the worst place to start. The most likely outcome is probably just increased acrimony, no matter what the result of the vote.


text: merdinha

title: merdinha


text:
tántorog

Etymology
From a bound stem + +.

Verb

 * 1)  to reel, stagger, totter

title: tántorog


text:
User talk:MOXOM

86.69.154.232 18:03, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:MOXOM


text:
Thread:User talk:TheDaveRoss/Kephir dispute resolution/reply (2)

Well, I wouldn't say this is wholly punitive. It's preventive in the sense that it aims to stop Kephir bullshit blocking me again. It also wasn't taken lightly; I used literally all the bullets I could before resorting to this. I tried talking to Kephir...and he deleted my comments as vandalism. Other people tried talking to Kephir...and he refused to acknowledge any wrongdoing, continuing to maintain that I'm a vandal and should be indeffed. But if you think we can still talk our way out of this, go right ahead and talk to Kephir about his blocks. See what happens. I think it's likely that you'll get one of the following two responses:

 * 1) Kephir refuses to respond entirely (perhaps by deleting your thread), or
 * 2) Kephir maintains he was clearly in the right, and I should be indeffed as a vandal

As you can see, either response is ridiculous, but you could still try talking to him. Good luck,


text:
מתן תורה

Proper noun

 * 1) the giving of the Torah to the Israelites at Mount Sinai

title: מתן תורה


text:
grajd

Etymology
, from ; compare 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) stable, cowshed

title: grajd


text:
onlest

Etymology
Variant of.

Adjective

 * 1)  Only.
 * 2) * c. 1850-1970, Scott Dunbar, quoted in 2009 by William R. Ferris in Give My Poor Heart Ease: Voices of the Mississippi Blues ISBN 080789852X:
 * I knowed the onlest thing to get her cured was to get a bucket of ice water,
 * I knowed the onlest thing to get her cured was to get a bucket of ice water,

title: onlest


text:
מתּן־תּורה

Proper noun

 * 1) the giving of the Torah to the Israelites at Mount Sinai

title: מתּן־תּורה


text: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 齊

title: Category:Japanese terms spelled with 齊


text: Category:Adyghe terms with historical senses


text:
stăuină

Etymology
Probably from ; another proposed etymology was a, from.

Noun

 * 1)  a winter stable for sheep or other animals
 * 2)  a shelter or stable for cattle, or a place for cattle to sleep in the summer
 * 3)  a place with much grass, fit for a stable, pen, or enclosure

title: stăuină


text:
văcăriță

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) female cowherd

title: văcăriță


text: bittocks

title: bittocks


text:
vãcãreasã

Etymology
From. Compare 🇨🇬

Noun

 * 1) female cowherd

title: vãcãreasã


text:
stigmarian

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) Relating to the fossil roots known as Stigmaria.

title: stigmarian


text:
Talk:dallol

The uses of the term/word "dallol" as part of the place names of certain watercourses in West Africa and as the name of a volcano and nearby ghost town in Ethiopia, may have separate etymological origins. ZFT (talk) 19:21, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

See also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Dallol_(volcano)#Etymology

title: Talk:dallol


text: Stigmarian

title: Stigmarian


text: Category:pau:Education

title: Category:pau:Education


text: Category:pau:Society

title: Category:pau:Society


text:
Reconstruction:Proto-Finnic/pürkidäk

Etymology
Akin to Proto-Samic, both possibly borrowings from. The substitution *w → *p would be for phonotactic reasons.

Verb

 * 1) to strive for, to endeavor
 * 2) to tend to do

Descendants

 * Estonian: →
 * Estonian: →

title: Reconstruction:Proto-Finnic/pürkidäk


text: Category:pau:Transport

title: Category:pau:Transport


text: Category:pau:Foods

title: Category:pau:Foods


text: Category:pau:Food and drink

title: Category:pau:Food and drink


text:
ငှက်ပျော

Noun

 * 1) banana, plantain

Usage notes
As with most fruit names, this word is usually found compounded with ; the full term is thus ငှက်ပျောသီး.

title: ငှက်ပျော


text:
benzio

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) toilet

title: benzio


text:
בצק פריך

Etymology
+

Noun

 * 1) short pastry

title: בצק פריך


text: Category:Palauan terms derived from Dutch


text: Category:pau:Beverages

title: Category:pau:Beverages


text: Category:pau:Liquids

title: Category:pau:Liquids


text: Category:pau:Matter

title: Category:pau:Matter


text: Category:pau:Nature

title: Category:pau:Nature


text:
vãcãreatsã

Etymology
From, from. . Compare 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) place for cattle to rest
 * 2) shelter or stable for cows, cowshed

title: vãcãreatsã


text:
keizai

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) economics

title: keizai


text: Category:pau:Economics

title: Category:pau:Economics


text: Category:pau:Social sciences

title: Category:pau:Social sciences


text:
văcăreață

Etymology
, from. . Compare 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1)  place for cattle to rest
 * 2)  shelter or stable for cows, cowshed

title: văcăreață


text:
מחזמר

Etymology
.

title: מחזמר


text:
dngod

Noun

 * 1) tattoo needle

title: dngod


text: Category:Palauan terms with IPA pronunciation


text: Category:pau:Tools

title: Category:pau:Tools


text: Category:pau:Technology

title: Category:pau:Technology


text:
văcărie

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) shelter or stable for cows
 * 2) herd of cows/cattle

title: văcărie


text:
מחזה

Noun

 * 1) a sight, a spectacle
 * 2) a play

title: מחזה


text:
cireadă

Etymology
, from, from. .

Compare (obsolete) 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) herd, flock, drove (of cattle or other horned animals)

title: cireadă


text:
շնորհել

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to grant
 * 2)  to bestow, give a gift
 * 1)  to bestow, give a gift

title: շնորհել


text: Category:pau:Currency

title: Category:pau:Currency


text: Category:pau:Money

title: Category:pau:Money


text: Category:pau:Business

title: Category:pau:Business


text:
mererengeringel

Etymology
From a reduplication of.

Verb

 * 1) to be somewhat difficult

title: mererengeringel


text: Category:Palauan verbs

title: Category:Palauan verbs


text: ציִעניזם

title: ציִעניזם


text: kōhi

title: kōhi


text:
ikelesia

Etymology
From, from , from , from.

Noun

 * 1) church

title: ikelesia


text:
շնորհեմ

Etymology
A denominative from.

Verb

 * 1)  to grant, to give as a gift, to bestow, to concede, to remit, to forgive, to (grant) pardon
 * 2)  to do or speak according to a person's known proclivities, to seek to please, to shew a particular regard for, to favour, to flatter, to adulate, to wheedle
 * 3)  to be granted, to be given (as a gift)
 * 1)  to do or speak according to a person's known proclivities, to seek to please, to shew a particular regard for, to favour, to flatter, to adulate, to wheedle
 * 2)  to be granted, to be given (as a gift)

title: շնորհեմ


text: Category:Palauan terms derived from Spanish


text: ציִעניסט

title: ציִעניסט


text: Category:Palauan terms derived from Romance languages


text:
ציוניסט

Noun

 * 1) Zionist

title: ציוניסט


text: Category:Palauan terms derived from Italic languages


text:
stoang

Etymology
From, from , from.

Noun

 * 1) store

title: stoang


text: Category:pau:Businesses

title: Category:pau:Businesses


text: Category:pau:Christianity

title: Category:pau:Christianity


text: Category:pau:Religion

title: Category:pau:Religion


text: Category:pau:Culture

title: Category:pau:Culture


text:
cywir

Etymology
From, from (compare 🇨🇬), from  +. Equivalent to cy.

Adjective

 * 1) correct, true, real, genuine
 * 2) sincere, honest, upright, fair
 * 3) exact, precise, accurate
 * 4) faithful, loyal, trustworthy

Noun

 * 1) one who is loyal to a person  or cause, staunch supporter, loyalist
 * 2) trustworthy person
 * 3) honest and upright person

title: cywir


text:
ကျွန်တော်တို့

Pronoun

 * 1)  we, us

title: ကျွန်တော်တို့


text:
heathenistic

Adjective

 * 1) Relating to heathenism.

title: heathenistic


text: bisexualists

title: bisexualists


text:
progressive stack

Noun

 * 1)  A list of speakers arranged so that people from marginalized groups get the chance to speak first.

title: progressive stack


text: progressive stacks

title: progressive stacks


text:
Talk:progressive stack

You reckon we're missing the appropriate sense at stack? —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 20:15, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

 * I only know this as a whole phrase. Equinox ◑ 18:05, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

title: Talk:progressive stack


text:
თიბავს

Etymology
See

Verb

 * 1) to mow, to reap

title: თიბავს


text: uncriticisable

title: uncriticisable


text:
こうひ

Noun

 * 1)  a legend
 * 2)  construction costs
 * 3)  a common ratio; a geometric ratio
 * 4)  a duchess
 * 5)  public expenditure
 * 6)  beating on a door; a visit to someone
 * 7)  an arthropod's shell, exoskeleton
 * 8)  light ratio
 * 9)  a wide or broad glow; broad magnanimity
 * 10)  an empress, a queen
 * 11)  one's parents, particularly if they have already passed away
 * 12)  an empress
 * 13)  a past empress, an empress who is no longer reigning
 * 14)  an honorific term for a favor or patronage received
 * 15)  an honorific term for criticism or feedback received
 * 16)  high and low places; high and low social positions
 * 17)  grain husks and bran; a rough meal; something boring or worthless

Verb

 * 1)  to beat on a door; to visit someone
 * 2)  to spread widely

title: こうひ


text: air-raid

title: air-raid


text: air-raids

title: air-raids


text:
-တွေ

Usage notes
The voiced variant occurs after vowels and ; the voiceless variant  after.

Suffix

 * 1) lots of
 * 1) lots of

title: -တွေ


text: こひ

title: こひ


text:
slurpability

Noun

 * 1)  The quality of being slurpable.

title: slurpability


text:
თიბვა

Etymology
From, from. Cognate with 🇨🇬, from 🇨🇬.

Etymology
From.

Verbal noun

 * 1) the act of reaping, harvesting, mowing

title: თიბვა


text:
zoodles

Noun

 * 1)  Zucchini sliced into thin strips so as to resemble noodles.

title: zoodles


text:
Europeanistic

Adjective

 * 1) Relating to, or supporting, Europeanism.

title: Europeanistic


text: kobiru

title: kobiru


text: eucre

title: eucre


text:
rengasrikko

Noun

 * 1) puncture, flat (tyre/tire)

title: rengasrikko


text:
Reconstruction:Proto-Germanic/hlōaną

Etymology
From, frequentative form of , from. Cognate with 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1) to shout
 * 2) to bellow; roar

title: Reconstruction:Proto-Germanic/hlōaną


text:
kobi

Etymology
Said by Voorhoeve to be from.

Noun

 * 1) knife

title: kobi


text: ankhus

title: ankhus


text:
Reconstruction:Proto-Semitic/miʔat-

Etymology
Compare 🇨🇬.

Numeral

 * 1) hundred

Descendants

 * East Semitic:
 * West Semitic:
 * Central Semitic:
 * Northwest Semitic:
 * Canaanite:
 * Ethiopian Semitic:
 * Canaanite:
 * Ethiopian Semitic:
 * Canaanite:
 * Ethiopian Semitic:
 * Ethiopian Semitic:
 * Ethiopian Semitic:
 * Ethiopian Semitic:

title: Reconstruction:Proto-Semitic/miʔat-


text: ankhuses

title: ankhuses


text:
ethnopluralism

Etymology
, attributed to French New Right intellectual.

Noun

 * 1) A right-wing theory of multiculturalism, supporting separatism, and according to which cultures hinge on ethnicities bound to specific geographic locations.

title: ethnopluralism


text:
ethnopluralist

Noun

 * 1) A supporter of ethnopluralism.

title: ethnopluralist


text: ethnopluralists

title: ethnopluralists


text:
faggotism

Noun

 * 1)  homosexuality

title: faggotism


text:
bitãrneatsã

Etymology
From. Compare 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) old age
 * 2) oldness

title: bitãrneatsã


text:
freakbeat

Etymology
,.

Noun

 * 1) A genre of hard-driving British rock music, often from the 1960s and associated with a mod following.

title: freakbeat


text:
fosterable

Adjective

 * 1) Capable of being fostered; suitable for fostering.

title: fosterable


text:
antisweat

Adjective

 * 1) Preventing the build-up of moisture or condensation.

title: antisweat


text:
noncomplainer

Noun

 * 1) One who does not complain.

title: noncomplainer


text:
ungrumpy

Adjective

 * 1) Not grumpy.

title: ungrumpy


text: noncomplainers

title: noncomplainers


text:
շնորհակալ

Etymology
.

Adjective

 * 1) grateful, thankful

Adjective

 * 1) grateful, obliged

title: շնորհակալ


text:
plazh

Etymology
Borrowed from (compare 🇨🇬).

Noun

 * 1) beach

title: plazh


text:
Reconstruction:Proto-Finnic/rakja

Etymology
Akin to 🇨🇬, possibly an old borrowing from a source akin to, presuming a sense development "that which is straightened" > "limb".

Liukkonen (1999) proposes borrowing from, a variant of (whence e.g. 🇨🇬).

Noun

 * 1) limb

title: Reconstruction:Proto-Finnic/rakja


text: couping

title: couping


text:
kaiso

Noun

 * 1) A style of music popular in the Caribbean, a precursor to calypso music.
 * 2) An individual musical work in this style.

title: kaiso


text:
kaisonian

Noun

 * 1) A performer of kaiso music.

title: kaisonian


text: kaisos

title: kaisos


text: kaisonians

title: kaisonians


text:
court in banc

Noun

 * 1)  The full court sitting at its regular terms for the hearing of arguments upon questions of law, as distinguished from a sitting at nisi prius.

title: court in banc


text: courts in banc

title: courts in banc


text: court in bank

title: court in bank


text:
chaparajos

Noun

 * 1) chaps

title: chaparajos


text:
Reconstruction:Proto-Finnic/satama

Etymology
From. The root is probably borrowed from (whence 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, dialectal 🇨🇬).

Another possible explanation is derivation from, with the semantic development "place of falling" > "place of descending (into a boat)", for which a parallel appears in.

Noun

 * 1) harbor, haven

title: Reconstruction:Proto-Finnic/satama