text:
User talk:Huhu9001

Welcome message
(Pls don't forget that Chinese translation need traditional, simplified (with pinyin), in this order). --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 02:35, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
 * To Anatoli T.: Sorry but I am not familiar with that and have to leave the task to others who are willing to complete it.Huhu9001 (talk) 02:44, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
 * OK. You may start by adding a Babel table to your user page, so people know what languages you're familiar with.
 * What I was referring to is, instead of @silo e.g.:

 * Chinese:
 * Mandarin:
 * It should look like this (if you know the info):

--Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 02:50, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Chinese:
 * Mandarin: ,
 * To Anatoli T.:Thank you for your advice.Huhu9001 (talk) 02:56, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi. You're still adding just the simplified form. You need to add both. It's a standard requirement.--Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 23:36, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
 * To Anatoli T.: Sorry but I have already given my explanation. I am not familiar with Traditional Chinese Characters and have to leave the task to others who are willing to complete it.Huhu9001 (talk) 18:25, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi. There are many online dictionaries with both sets of scripts, converters, Pleco dictionary for mobile devices. You're just making someone else fix your edits, which is time-consuming. This is the policy page: About_Chinese. Quote: "The traditional precedes the simplified version if they are different and the transliteration is provided with the simplified version." --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 13:44, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

茶 and 了
Please see User talk:Kc_kennylau. The different modern-day pronunciations of 茶 and 荼 were from different, but related Old Chinese pronunciations. 了 does not derive from 來. Cantonese 仲 is not derived from 總 either; it is from 重. Wyang (talk) 04:56, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
 * to Wyang: Why, with both being /*rlaː/? 了 is thought to be from 來 because 來 is still used in some dialects where 了 occupied in MSM. This conclusion was drawn from The Sino-Tibetan Languages by G. Thurgood and R. LaPolla, page 92.Huhu9001 (talk) 05:19, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
 * to Wyang: Not mentioning the reconstructions of OCH itself is far from being accurate, only several possible pronunciations are given rather than a single "correct" one. Instead a more reliable clue comes from the rule of vowel shifts /a/ to /u/ in OCH.Huhu9001 (talk) 05:25, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Reconstructions are reconstructions. I don't think there can be a single "correct" one unless we have a time machine. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 05:48, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
 * /*rlaː/ generates Middle Chinese /ɖˠa/, which gives cha2. All the developments were regular. However, the tu2 pronunciation of 荼 is from Old Chinese /*l'aː/, and is hence not valid as a word comparandum obeying regular sound changes. The reference in Thurgood is not convincing; compare the passages on 了 and 來 in Schuessler (2007) "ABC Etymological Dictionary of Old Chinese" - 來 is evidently not a contraction of 了 + 也, which is what is claimed in Thurgood. The etymologies need to be backed up with references, and when multiple references exist, by consensus amongst them. Wyang (talk) 05:55, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
 * to Wyang: ABC did not deny that 了 is from 來, but only 來 is from 了 + 也, which is not a conclusion but a suggestion in Thurgood's book.Huhu9001 (talk) 06:10, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Let's look at this in more detail. I was able to find the following references which had analysed the use of 了 in medieval literature and commented on the origin or development of this particle.

吴福祥（1998）．重谈“动+了+宾”格式的来源和完成体助词“了”的产生．《中国语文》第6期．452–462页．

"“了”先在“动+了”格式里虚化为动相补语，然后带上宾语就形成了“动+了+宾”格式，即[动+了]+[宾]>[动+了+宾]，最后，”动+了+宾”格式中的动相补语”了”进一步虚化变成完成体助词."

沈陽，玄玥（2013）．“完結短語”及漢語結果補語的語法化和完成體標記的演變過程．Breaking Down the Barriers, 553–576页．

"'完結短語”假設是在生成語法理論框架內提出的關於漢語虛化結果補語的理論，認為虛化結果補語在動詞短語內部投射為主要謂語動詞的內部體“完結短語”. 依據這個假設理論，可以解釋漢語完成體標記”了”從結果補語到虛化結果補語、最終發展為體標記的語法化過程，並在句法結構上支持動詞後存在兩個不同的“了”."

宋新宇（2013）．敦煌变文中“了”的语法化考察．《山东大学》．

"本文运用语法化动因和机制的相关理论，对书中”了“的语法化等级进行了动因和机制的阐释. ”了“的语法化等级产生的动因主要包括语法、语义和语用三方面的因素，主要体现在：”动+了“的句型是”了“语法化的基础，”了“的动词语义从表示动作过程的结束到表示状态完成，呈现出的逐渐弱化的趋势体现和促进着”了“语法化等级的发生，而”了“的在”动+了“句式中的高频率使用等因素也是”了“语法化等级产生的动因. ”了“语法化等级的发生机制主要体现在弱化和类推：弱化就是”了“呈现出的词义和语音的弱化，类推主要表现在”了“与有界动词到无界动词再到形容词的搭配扩散，在扩散中完成了”了“的语法化过程."

梁银峰（2006）．”V+了+O”格式来源的再探讨——兼论事态助词”了”的来源．《语言研究集刊》．

"上述公式说明“V+O+了”中的“了”是事态助词“了”的直接来源. 我们认为“V+O+了”中的“了”并非事态助词的唯一来源 . 在$2.2.2中我们已经指出，某些“V+了”中的“了”除了看作动相补语以外，其中有些也可看作事态助词."

曹广顺（1987）．语气词“了”源流浅说．《中国语文》第2期．

"近年来，不断有同志撰文介绍，在一些北方方言中，“了2”的语音形式受到“也”的影响，可能是“了也”的合音. 因此，不能排出“了2”的形成过程在不同方言区发展不平衡的可能. 也就是说，可能直到元代，在部分北方方言中“了2”的使用仍不很自由，其处于句尾时仍须“了也”连用. 这种方言差别反映到史料中，造成了宋元两代文献里“了”和“了也”用法的差异. ……从“了2”形成的整个历史过程看，“了”字的发展一直是沿着从不自由到自由，从实词到虚词的轨道前进，元代的情况，只是这个历史进程中一个小的曲折. 入明以后，“了2”的使用又逐渐回复到南宋的情况，“了也”也重新消失了."

刘勋宁（1985）．现代汉语句尾“了”的来源．《方言》第2期．128–133页．

"《祖堂集》里的”了“字依出现位置可分三类，但依语法性质，实际只是两类. 这两类句式与今天现代汉语的两种”了“字句是严格对应的，而现代汉语的语气词”了“则来源于近代汉语的C式句. 我们采用近代汉语的“了也”并合而成为现代汉语句尾“了2”的说法，不只是因为“了也”的语法位置与今天的“了2”相对应，而且可以很好地说明我们在上一节所揭示的句尾“了”和“也”的平行的音韵关系."

The consensus in the literature is that the sentence-final 了 had developed from the perfective marker 了 via either one of the following sequences:
 * V + O + 了 > V + 了 + O (aspect particle) > V + 了 > sentence-final modal particle
 * V + O + 了 > V + 了 (aspect particle) > V + 了 + O > sentence-final modal particle

In this process, the last step may have involved the fusion with sentence-final 也 in certain northern Mandarin dialects, resulting in distinct pronunciations of the two particle uses of 了.

This is very far from in 了, which says 了 is derived from 來 without any other context given. Before it can be demonstrated by a thorough review of the literature supporting one's hypothesis that 了 is derived from 來, this is an unsubstantiated view which is inconsistent with the consensus on the origin of the modal particle 了 in the literature. Wyang (talk) 09:59, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 21:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

-- Huhu9001 (talk) 09:55, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Like I said earlier, separating the syn/ant information from the definitions allows us to include pinyin and qualifiers which is useful to users. And we are, after all, a dictionary first and foremost and not a thesaurus. So why put them together? What benefit does that provide? In the thousands of Chinese entries - plus tens of thousands of English entries - we use the original formatting. Why not maintain consistency? ---> Tooironic (talk) 10:37, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I simply don't see why this makes Wiktionary "less like a dictionary". -- Huhu9001 (talk) 10:43, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
 * OK. I understand. Thank you for your effort. ---> Tooironic (talk) 10:47, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Also if you are referring to traditional dictionaries, I would like to say that traditional dictionaries, when providing "see also" (including Syms/Ants) information, usually only give a bare entry name for readers to look up. They put pinyin or any other things in the main entries rather than give them beside the "see also" information. -- Huhu9001 (talk) 10:52, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
 * As we often say, we are not a paper dictionary, so we don't have to worry about too much information on the page. The pinyin information does not require additional input by editors - it displays automatically - so I don't see what the benefit would be of turning that feature off. ---> Tooironic (talk) 10:59, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

False accusation and unfair block from User:Wyang
If possible, I would like to call for the removal of this user from administrators for his constant abusing of power. Having him remaining in his place is quite harmful to Wiktionary. -- Huhu9001 (talk) 10:49, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm having trouble understanding what this is all about: on the one hand, I see corrections by others on only two of your edits this month, which doesn't look like what I would expect from a repeat egregiously bad editor. On the other hand, I see corrections by others on only two of your edits this month, which doesn't begin to justify your angry outburst on Wyang's talk page.
 * As for "I almost merely copy from Japanese dictionaries recently": Wyang isn't commenting on your Japanese, but on your English. Unless you're copying word-for-word, which would be copyright violation and/or plagiarism, the phrasing of your definitions is your work- and your responsibility. The phrasing of that sentence doesn't show the best command of English, so that may be the kind of thing he was referring to. I don't have time right now to go through your edits to see if Wyang has a point regarding content (if it's even the kind of thing I'm qualified to judge), but as far as his characterization of your attitude, I have to agree with him. Chuck Entz (talk) 14:04, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Because this admin has harassed me before in 彈頭 and as far as I see he has been always ill-attituded towards who dissents him. In fact I have tried my best to avoid him for quite a period of time as I hate to engage in a conflict with such an admin, but still he and the trouble came for me, which was the thing that really frustrated me. -- Huhu9001 (talk) 14:34, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
 * More. I am interested in neither the bureaucratic things of Wiktionary, nor Wyrang himself, but I did observe him once playing some tricks like blocking himself in order to earn sympathy of the community (chiefly other admins I guess) and to get rid of the then accusation of abusing admin rights over some other users. I don't know what you think of it but I would take this as hypocritic performance and it would be quite a dismay to think about having to endure such a person, who I must admit is quite good at reinforcing his own position and power by this kind of performance, when participating in Wiktionary in the foreseeable future. This is another reason of my angry outburst. -- Huhu9001 (talk) 15:02, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

 * Please see User:Wyang. Would you mind me asking what is the story behind this admin? His behaviour just seems irrational. Also, don't you think it is a bit questionable to install such a user as an admin? -- Huhu9001 (talk) 16:49, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

In case it changes, the user page above reads:

 * Please remove all of my rights.

 * 烏煙瘴氣. This site will always be a kludge. Let it 自生自滅.

-- Huhu9001 (talk) 16:56, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey

Hi ,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. [mailto:surveys@wikimedia.org Email us] if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 14:34, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Excuse me. Can anyone tell me what's the story behind User:Wyang?

 * Why is he still kept as an admin even if he looks quite self-abandoned now?

-- Huhu9001 (talk) 15:23, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Rights removed as he requested. SemperBlotto (talk) 16:10, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

 * Thank godness you finally have this tumor removed. -- Huhu9001 (talk) 07:32, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey

Hi ,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. [mailto:surveys@wikimedia.org Email us] if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 19:14, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey

Hi ,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. [mailto:surveys@wikimedia.org Email us] if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 17:04, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

zh-pron
Thanks for your edits on MOD:zh-pron. I was wondering if there's a way to move the more/less button up in the main section (part 1 and 2). — justin(r)leung { (t...) 17:43, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Made a change. Is that what you supposed? -- Huhu9001 (talk) 19:04, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Yup, perfect! Thanks a lot! — justin(r)leung { (t...) 19:56, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
 * I have a question. Is there any possibility to have class="collapsable" (the HTML class that caused the trouble this time) to function on the mobile site? I noticed there are still other Chinese templates using it like and . Are we supposed to wait for future improvement of this class or just abandon it altogether in these templates? -- Huhu9001 (talk) 04:19, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
 * We can't really do anything because it's a Wikimedia problem. I think there's a Phabricator issue for this, but I don't see it being fixed in the near future. If I remember correctly, the issue is that there's a bunch of code that's not in the mobile site to reduce the download size for mobile users. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 04:25, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the minor edit at, however the bigger issue is the template for single-kanji verbs. Can you take a look at this if you have the time? ～ POKéTalker（═◉═） 08:22, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
 * It seems to be this edit by that is responsible for the situation. -- Huhu9001 (talk) 08:46, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
 * If you're not aware, the template discussion is still ongoing: Grease_pit/2019/October. ～ POKéTalker（═◉═） 17:08, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

放物線 and 抛物線
I've reverted at 抛物線.

 * Your edit removes useful information from the entry that is not easily found elsewhere.
 * Your edit comment says "reduce redundancy". However, your edits instead introduced redundancy, by effectively saying "see 放物線" twice.

I've also reverted at 放物線.

 * Your edit removes useful information from the entry that is not easily found elsewhere.
 * Moreover, some of the information you removed is sourced, while the information you added is not. This kind of edit is discouraged, especially without discussion.
 * → Do you have any source clearly indicating that the Japanese term came from Chinese? Or perhaps a source showing the Chinese term 抛物線 in use in Chinese before the 1880s?  If so, please add the source.  When doing so, please do not remove the mention of the first date of appearance in Japanese.

 * Furthermore, some of the information you removed is information that you yourself have advocated for addition (the mention of 代用字).
 * → Could you explain why you removed ?

TIA, ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 16:50, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

 * "introduced redundancy"? Come on. Are you kidding me? I have left the etymology section just because I had not determined whether to remove it altogether. But now I think I should have done so. Do you just copy the etymology section from economics to œconomics and say it is "useful information from the entry that is not easily found elsewhere"?
 * Chinese 抛物线 is in 华英萃林韵府(1872). It was brought there by US missionaries. -- Huhu9001 (talk) 17:10, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

 * Re: introduced redundancy, your edit resulted in the following wikicode:

See.

 * This produced the following rendering:

 See.

 * We have two instances of "see [this other entry]". That's redundancy right there on the page.  I'm not sure what's confusing about that for you?  (Serious question, no snark.)
 * Re: the etymology, thank you for that additional detail. Do you have a source link?  If not, no worries, at least we have a title.  ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 17:37, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Don't you think it is ridiculous to have t:ja-see and all those stuffs to get all contents moved to the lemma entry, but then on the other hand manually have some of them moved back? In other words, the entry looks redundant after my edit, just because it has already been redundant before my edit. In fact I had tried to remove redundancy and my biggest mistake is having not removed them entirely so that I can prevent these stupid accusations. -- Huhu9001 (talk) 18:05, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm confused. Prior to your edit, the entry at  has no redundancy: the information on the page does not repeat itself.  What redundancy are you referencing?  ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 19:43, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
 * "Redundancy" does not only includes "repeating itself", but also "repeating other pages". If this is still not clear enough, I don't know how to explain that for you any further. -- Huhu9001 (talk) 02:50, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes, as I mentioned separately over at Talk:放物線 in, I came to realize that you were probably intending such redundancy between entries, rather than just within a single entry (as was my initial understanding and focus). FWIW, my primary perspective is often usability for readers -- is the relevant and necessary information for this entry easily available and clearly understandable to the reader?  As such, my focus is more on how the page renders, rather than where the data lives.  I don't care so much about data duplication, so long as the site is usable for readers.  If there is an approach that addresses both usability and data-deduplication, such as 's development of  and , I'm all for it.  ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 02:38, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Your recent edit at 呉音
Curious about. Do you have any source stating as much? Japanese sources like the KDJ instead just describe this as related to the ancient kingdoms of Wu and Han, which seems to fit with the dialectal pronunciation information we have for Middle Chinese and descendants. ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 22:04, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

 * Hmm, maybe saying "misnomer" is wrong. "Misnomer" is mainly because some writers said the origin of goon is unclear or miscellaneous, like this: https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/nihongonokenkyu/11/3/11_KJ00010156161/_pdf/-char/ja

 * The "kan'on supporter" story is here: http://daijirin.dual-d.net/extra/kanjion.html

そして、既に流布していた南方音に基づく字音を「呉音」（南方の訛った音の意）と呼んでこれを退けた.

 * -- Huhu9001 (talk) 06:58, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Module errors after your edit to Module:ja
I would guess that at least half of the 40 entries currently in CAT:E are there because of your edit. I have no clue whether your edit is wrong, the entries are wrong or it's some combination, but this needs to be addressed. Thanks! Chuck Entz (talk) 21:44, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Possibly also MOD:ja-headword. Have these edits been discussed anywhere? I don't think the formatting of the headword templates should be changed radically without consensus. A major problem I see is that the ruby aren't aligned properly for many cases. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 21:51, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Working. -- Huhu9001 (talk) 21:58, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Please look at this ruby-related problem. Thanks! Chuck Entz (talk) 14:29, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
 * In the kana text, there are 2 spaces between "いる" and "と". Reduce them to 1 space, or insert 2 spaces as well in the kanji text. -- Huhu9001 (talk) 14:40, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
 * As I said before: "I have no clue whether your edit is wrong, the entries are wrong or it's some combination, but this needs to be addressed". My purpose wasn't to criticize your coding skills, but to point out an instance where something that was working last week stopped working after your edits, so you could deal with it. I fix a lot of obvious minor errors (I had no clue how to fix this particular one, though), but when there's a possibility that there may be larger issues, I bring it to the attention of the person most likely to need to understand that there's a problem. In this case, it looked like you were unaware that this was related to your module edits, and it might be something you needed to know about. Chuck Entz (talk) 15:00, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I had already been fully aware of that error and its cause before you told it to me. But I had been thinking I was not supposed to edit someone else's comment. -- Huhu9001 (talk) 15:17, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Letting a module error sit there isn't good practice: the added clutter in CAT:E makes it harder to spot new errors.
 * If you think about it, the change in the module had already modified the comment- for the worse. Deleting a single space to make it display pretty much exactly as it originally did is more like restoring the translation (not really a comment, strictly speaking) than changing it. You have to ask yourself whether would have felt you were putting words in his mouth or second-guessing his formatting choices. Also, if you're polite about it and make it clear through an edit comment what you're doing and why you're doing it, you're unlikely to offend anyone- even if they disagree with your edit.
 * If you still don't feel comfortable making the change, the other option is to let the person know about the problem and either ask permission to make the change or ask them to make it. Chuck Entz (talk) 04:24, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

I want a template editor's right
I want to edit t:ja-go-u to add ウ音便 stuffs. I am familiar with these. -- Huhu9001 (talk) 10:18, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Please make this request at the Beer Parlour. - TheDaveRoss  12:44, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Changes at 訓読み
Hi Huhu9001, in your recent, you unfortunately reintroduced various issues that I'd been trying to fix, including outdated formatting, unclear text, grammatical errors, and mistaken headers.

Reading your edits and edit comments, I confess that I'm uncertain what your main concern is. Your current text now says that kun'yomi is:

a kind of Japanese kanji readings that is not based on the kanji's original pronunciation borrowed from Chinese

This description would include, which are much more commonly treated as a type of.

I've had another go at the entry, fixing the formatting and grammatical issues, and adding a usage note to address the exceptions that you mentioned in your edit comment. To expand upon my own earlier edit comment, the key distinction between on and kun seems to be whether the word as pronounced is regarded as originally Chinese (on), or as natively Japanese, also including nativized terms (kun).

Please have a look and let me know if you see any outstanding issues. ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 22:06, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

 * On means "sound" and Kun means "meaning". That's good enough. I don't know why you just keep inventing a however still inaccurate definition stating it is "native". -- Huhu9001 (talk) 22:12, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Native, or nativized, as opposed to borrowed from Chinese. This is essentially what it says at 訓読み; I'm not inventing anything.  Why the accusation?
 * And your edited text is still incorrect English. I'll fix it in a moment.  ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 22:16, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
 * "nativized" is obviously an invention. It is absurd. What is "nativizedness"? Is it how long the word had been in the language? Then I would definitely say 非道 is more "nativized" than 酷い, let alone 莨. -- Huhu9001 (talk) 22:24, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
 * For the ja.wiki article, I would suppose the definition written there is that kind of typical "traditional grammar school teachings". It is flawful. It even contradicts the contents written in the same page. But people do not really have a motive to change it because it is the status quo, and its problem is rather trivial for practical use. -- Huhu9001 (talk) 22:37, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
 * As for the revert, I only tried to revert the definition. I was just copying the source from an older version when I clicked the submit button on the wrong page. Sorry for that. I have no words on those outdated formatting, mistaken headers or whatever. -- Huhu9001 (talk) 22:17, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Re: nativization, I am surprised by your apparent vehemence and upset. I certainly mean no offense.
 * "Nativization" it is an admittedly broad term with various dimensions. The core sense that I intended for "nativized" is "regarded and treated as a native term, subject to native sound shifts and inflection patterns".  This use of the terms "native" and "nativize" (and derivatives) is not uncommon in discussions of loanwords.  See also this post on the Linguistics Stack Exchange, discussing the terminology to describe the process whereby foreign words are brought into a language.
 * Nativization is something of a continuum, or matter of degree; while a Japanese speaker would never call bed a Japanese term, they might call a Japanese term of foreign origin.  Meanwhile, they would probably recognize  as a Chinese-derived Japanese term, but at the same time, they might not even be aware that  originates from a Chinese term.
 * For some examples in English, most speakers are not aware that is from French, while  is more commonly thought of as a loanword.  Another fully nativized borrowing is, originally from German.
 * I hope that helps clarify my use of the term. ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 23:48, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I had been upset for something else. But "nativized" is still a term too vague for a definition. As you have stated, it even depends on the might-be ignorance of individual speakers. Such phrasing should be avoided. -- Huhu9001 (talk) 00:12, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure I entirely agree, but I am happy to leave it out of the entry, especially as we have found other ways to explain the meaning and usage.  Cheers!  ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 00:22, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
 * That looks too much, and resembles what you have formerly accused as an "encyclopediac style". A better place for them is ap:Japanese glossary. Then you can simply leave a link to ap:Japanese glossary in that entry. -- Huhu9001 (talk) 00:35, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Ah, good suggestion! Simpler is good, so long as it's not ambiguous.  :)  I'll make that change now.  ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 17:50, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Actually, now that I look again at the entry, I'm not sure which portion you're describing as "encyclopedic". Perhaps the usage notes?  I am loath to force users to click through to other pages to get information about the term, and right now, the ap:Japanese glossary entry doesn't have information about exceptions.  If you're very concerned about the size of the 訓読み page, I suppose I could be convinced to move the exceptions info to the glossary entry, and link to that from the usage notes section.  I'll hold off on editing the entry for now since I'm not sure what would be best.  ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 17:56, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
 * The entry and the appendix both look good, thank you! ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 17:50, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

IP block exempt (User:Huhu9001Bot)
I am an IP block exempt. This is my bot. I want an IP block exempt right for it. Thank you. -- Huhu9001 (talk) 14:53, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Done, but you'll have to go through the process at WT:BOT before you can use it for anything but the required test edits. Chuck Entz (talk) 15:22, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Collapsing etymology sections
Hello Huhu9001, after seeing to fold away the etymology details, I found myself agreeing with your apparent move to visually streamline the entry, but also unhappy with the columnar formatting currently enforced by.

So I started a related thread at Grease_pit/2021/March to ask about collapsible template formatting, and even whether it might be possible to have  sections collapse automatically, like quotes already do. Please have a look when you have the time. ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 18:29, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

 * Why would you want to write such long glosses for those idioms? They should be in their own pages. -- Huhu9001 (talk) 21:40, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Idiom glosses are a separate issue, no? In the Grease Pit thread, I'm talking specifically about folding away the etymology details in a collapsible section.
 * About the idiom glosses specifically, I generally haven't felt comfortable building out full entries for these, in large part because of past community confusion over the years about whether we should even include such entries, and if so, what part of speech to use, what formatting to use, etc. I found it easier to just have the idiom and gloss + explanation under sub-headings of other entries, rather than building out full entries when those might just get deleted again later.  This confusion seems to be coming to a head again, prompting the thread over at [[Wiktionary:Beer_parlour/2021/March]].  I am hopeful that this latest round of discussion might arrive at a working consensus.  ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 23:00, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

糟糠の妻
I add 糟糠之妻 as an alternative in 糟糠の妻 since this dictionary list it as an entry and a yojijukugo. Is there a way to mention this form without making the template goes wrong? --TongcyDai (talk) 18:19, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Done. -- Huhu9001 (talk) 20:35, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Editing Module:zh-glyph/phonetic
Hi I am wondering how to edit the data at Module:zh-glyph/phonetic? I sometimes notice some simplified characters mistakenly included, such as 鳏. ChromeGames (talk) 00:12, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I removed 鳏. If you want to edit this protected module by yourself, consider applying for the template editor user group in wt:Beer parlour. -- Huhu9001 (talk) 00:33, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for doing that so quickly, and I appreciate the suggestion. Do you know if there are general requirements to become a template editor on Wiktionary? I didn't really see much mention of the matter. I feel that I have a decent amount of editing history and am moderately comfortable with programming in general but I don't have as much experience with editing templates specifically. Thanks, ChromeGames (talk) 05:45, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I don't know for sure what the requirements are either. But I think the most important point is to have some editors with whom you have worked before support you. -- Huhu9001 (talk) 13:13, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the information, I appreciate it. I have posted a request at the beer parlor so I hope it goes through, or at the least receives some helpful feedback or comments. ChromeGames (talk) 19:17, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

ja-noun for multiple counters
Hi, there are many nouns which have more than one counters (for example, can be counted with,  or ). Is it possible to show more than one counters in ja-noun? Also, do we need a classifier-by-language category system for Japanese? --TongcyDai (talk) 09:52, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I suggest you ask these 2 questions in the Beer Parlour. I don't feel confident enough to decide. -- Huhu9001 (talk) 10:06, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the suggestion! --TongcyDai (talk) 10:13, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

Block
The way you are behaving is genuinely unacceptable, because it is disruptive, mean-spirited and bad faith. Please stop. It just makes life harder for everyone - including you. Go cool off, and come back tomorrow. Theknightwho (talk) 09:37, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

unblock request
This block happened when I initiated a Grease pit discussion (Grease_pit) over the usage of some functions in mod:string utilities created by User:Theknightwho. Unfortunately, User:Theknightwho has a long history of being largely emotional, uncooperative and ready to resort to personal attacks. This user soon took this personally and began to attack me. I even have to beg him to stop when I am posting the results of some my own tests. This user cursed me using the word "arsehole".

While I absolutely admit the profound technical contributions this user has made on Wiktionary. I sincerely question the necessity of posing this user as an admin, since this user is generally unstable and confrontative. As we know editing modules or templates does not need admin rights and this user will do more benefit and less harm to the community if this user were to contribute as a normal user.

Please review the ban for the reason stated above. -- Huhu9001 (talk) 09:56, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

-- Huhu9001 (talk) 09:56, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
 * @Hippietrail, SemperBlotto, Mike, Stephen G. Brown, TheDaveRoss
 * @EncycloPetey, Jusjih, Chuck Entz, Paul G, Dvortygirl

 * This is a completely unreasonable request. You were being vindictive, and now you're being dishonest and manipulative. If anything, this is likely to result in your block length being increased. Calling me "unstable" borders on abusive. Theknightwho (talk) 09:58, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Please reconsider your stance on this admin whether supporting this user or not. I believe this user's administration has become a substantial unstable facter to the community. This user can still make good contributions to Wiktionary without admin rights and I think it is also for this user's own good. -- Huhu9001 (talk) 10:21, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
 * @Huhu9001 You were completely out of line in that thread. Vininn126 (talk) 10:23, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
 * IMO this is a fairly bad block, since the blocking admin was involved and wasn't much less needlessly rude than Huhu9001 was. — S URJECTION / T / C / L / 11:12, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I definitely agree it could have been handled better. Vininn126 (talk) 11:12, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
 * To clarify - I think Huhu was definitely the worst instigator and escalator and should have backed down several times - knight could have handled the conversation differently, but I think even this massive wall Huhu has written is a bit of an overreaction. Vininn126 (talk) 11:19, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I would prefer that I not be pinged for issues like this, and mass-pinging folks for this when it doesn't look good on you either... does not help your case at all. I agree with Vininn & Surjection, and to be frank, I've been frustrated with Theknightwho too with changes to the language modules as Korean & Jeju have been broken for weeks on end (still broken at !), and wish that he'd add more documentation, but that does not excuse the language/attitude that you've used as well. AG202 (talk) 12:45, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
 * @AG202 I will just say that the issue of is a nontrivial problem! I have actually spent quite a large amount of time on that particular issue, because it's a symptom of a much more significant underlying problem. Theknightwho (talk) 12:56, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
 * @Theknightwho I am aware of this, but as I've said before, I wish that you had documented and tested the changes that went in beforehand. The entries weren't broken for years before your changes and now they've been broken for almost a month. The breakage was caused by you, and while I emphasize with the fact that they aren't easy to fix, it is a problem that you yourself brought about. It's not a symptom of some third-party breakage that just happened to happen. If this is not fixed soon, I'd push for some reverts because this is starting to get out of hand. I've been patient, but I can only be so patient. (CC: @Benwing2) AG202 (talk) 13:34, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
 * @AG202 I can do a fix that specifically works for Korean and Jeju, but I want to emphasise that this situation isn't anything to do with not testing: it's the fact that I made the (as it turns out incorrect) assumption that transliterations for bolded text would never be affected by the surrounding text. It's not something I could find anywhere (and I did look!), and it's not something that comes up very often.
 * I had been hoping to find some way of fixing the underlying problem without needing a sticking plaster, but I don't think it's possible. In any event, we've been over this before. Theknightwho (talk) 13:49, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I still think TKW needs to hold back from using admin tools in disputes he's involved in, but for what it's worth I don't really disagree with him about your attitude in that discussion (especially vs. Benwing) and drumming up a crusade over a one-day ban comes off as puerile. Sorry. —Al-Muqanna المقنع (talk) 13:47, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Yeah, in a case like this, where the behaviour Huhu was blocked for was clearly seen by other admins who were not involved in the dispute (happening on a page a lot of other admins clearly watch and edit), and where AFAIK Huhu has not been long-term problematic (am I mistaken? perhaps he mainly edits areas I don't), I don't think the one admin who was involved in the dispute should've issued a block. Where possible, admins should avoid issuing blocks about disputes they're involved in; it's better to just step back and let other admins decide whether anything blockworthy has happened. (Perhaps the best thing would've been to walk away and hope other editors weighed in on the substantive question of whether X or Y change to the module was a net positive or negative, but it doesn't seem like many other technically-adept editors have time or inclination to weigh in.) - -sche (discuss) 20:51, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I agree with the other admins, as an admin involved in a dispute you should not initiate a block of the other party unless there's an exceptional reason. Benwing2 (talk) 21:27, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
 * For the record, Huhu9001 has removed two comments which were particularly critical, supposedly on the basis of "vulgarity". However, this does not apply to much of the material removed. This appears to be yet another instance of dishonesty. Theknightwho (talk) 02:10, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
 * For the record, Huhu9001 has removed two comments which were particularly critical, supposedly on the basis of "vulgarity". However, this does not apply to much of the material removed. This appears to be yet another instance of dishonesty. Theknightwho (talk) 02:10, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Errors in prefix
Hi Huhu9001. I am seeing "Lua error in Module:languages at line 791: The function getByCode expects a string as its first argument, but received a table." when I use template:prefix. You appear to have edited modules here recently, so I hope you can fix this problem!

For example:

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:24, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

 * Not me. I only changed inline comments in that module, that is, no actual change. And I am also not the last one to edit mod:languages. See special:history/mod:languages, special:history/mod:links. -- Huhu9001 (talk) 07:30, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I will look into the bug later when I have time and if the bug is still there then. -- Huhu9001 (talk) 07:31, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
 * So I should ask user:Theknightwho about it then? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:34, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Change now reverted for now and error has disappeared. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:49, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Warning
If you cannot edit in a mature fashion, you will merely end up getting blocked again. That means you need to engage in discussion, instead of passive-aggression. Theknightwho (talk) 06:06, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Vote
Just dropping you a line to let you know that the desysop vote is now open since some of the evidence concerns Theknightwho's engagement with you. WordyAndNerdy (talk) 03:47, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

About your Japanese conjugation table
Hello. I found this page Module:User:Huhu9001/000 and this is 'kind of' something I was looking for to implement our current tables on the pt.wikt (e.g. pt:Predefinição:conj.ja.gu). My plans for my home wikt is to create a more complete table and then automatically create the conjugation pages with my bot there. Well, my question is: is this table complete or in process? And, is it being used somewhere on the en.wikt or is there a plan? Jesielt (user talk) 06:35, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

 * Thank you for your recognition. This thing is only half-made and I do wish to finish it in the future. However I have met with many difficulties, mainly objections regarding some of its styles from the en.wikt community, so I am very uncertain about when I can finish it. It is not used anywhere on the en.wikt now. -- Huhu9001 (talk) 07:21, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Please explain one of your Module modification
See the original question at Module_talk:Jpan-sortkey. Modification you did on the Module does not make sense to me and it does throw errors when executed (outside of MediaWiki servers, so the Scribunto like environment may not produce the same result, I cannot know as I have not access to MediWiki errors). Nevertheless as the code cannot be understood by a reasonable dev, it should be changed (at least for maintainability reasons), even if, by miracle it produces the expected result for an unknown reason. Please explain me the intended result, and I'll see how to fix this. Dodecaplex (talk) 07:37, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

 * I replied your question. I want to add a few more here:
 * MediaWiki modules are not responsible for errors outside MediaWiki.
 * Your question can be easily answered by yourself if you do a bit test in some sandbox pages, or use to do some debugs and see what the actual output is, instead of just guessing.
 * I don't know what you meant by saying "have not access to MediWiki errors" ("have no access to MediWiki errors" or "have not accessed MediWiki errors"?). Anyway this is not a valid excuse. Scribunto errors are visible to everyone in cat:E.
 * 2&3 show that you are not "a reasonable dev" as you have claimed. Try to be less hasty when running to a conclusion next time.
 * -- Huhu9001 (talk) 09:51, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Stop arguing and just fix the code, please. At the very least, it is a nonstandard function, so requires some explanation in the code. Theknightwho (talk) 12:11, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Oh boy. This admin locked mod:Jpan-sortkey to prevent me from editing it. But now all of a sudden he commands me to "just fix the code". I can't tell whether he is poking fun at me or just not thinking straight. -- Huhu9001 (talk) 12:32, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I can obviously unprotect it, but only on the condition you don’t reinstate the change that only you wanted to make. Theknightwho (talk) 12:35, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Why are you so distasteful? Just an answer their inquiry without attacking their person. — Fenakhay ( حيطي · مساهماتي ) 13:55, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
 * 1. I know and I don't ask you to produce something that will work in my setting, just to explain me what you intend to do with this program (so that I can decide on a correct course of action)
 * 2. Easily seems to be a very relative term. The behaviour you are relying on is not documented anywhere and the semantics of the Mediawiki and Scribunto does not support this usage which is entirely implementation specific.
 * 3. I don't have time nor willing to become a specialist of all the arcanes of MediaWiki or English wiktionary, I work with 23 languages editions, hence 23 differing usages and traditions... and I only have one lifetime.
 * 4. Maybe I was too harsh in my wording, as the question did not get any answer after several days, but I can assure you that this code could certainly win the "will sooner or later blow in your face" award. And I maintain that nobody can understand this without a very deep knowledge or long experience of the intricacies of current MediaWiki implementation.
 * Additionally, I have nothing to do with your personal wars and don't want to be part of it. Dodecaplex (talk) 14:03, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
 * This is a necessary response to "as the code cannot be understood by a reasonable dev". Normally people do not use themselves as an argument, and I indeed prefer that way. But since User:Dodecaplex has already done it that way, I have no choice because I can not make my case without talking about the person when the other party has already brought it up as an argument. It was that user that made the discussion personal, not me. -- Huhu9001 (talk) 14:18, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
 * @Huhu9001 It's a completely reasonable argument: you yourself repeatedly used it when asking (demanding) that I document modules myself. Telling someone else that they must figure it out themselves because it's now your turn to document code is a bit ridiculous. Theknightwho (talk) Theknightwho (talk) 14:50, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Jesus Christ, the very culprit that has obstructed me from writing any documentation in mod:Jpan-sortkey just can't stop harrassing me, can he? -- Huhu9001 (talk) 14:58, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I was waiting for you to agree to my condition. When you do that, I'll unprotect it. Theknightwho (talk) 15:07, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Bad faith removals
Don't do things like. You're just trying to start a fight again. There's nothing about it which needs consensus. Theknightwho (talk) 01:20, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

ガイジ
This term's is never originated from the sense limited only in intelligent disorder. Also physically disabled people and children with multiple disabilities in wheelchairs attending schools for the disabled can be called "ガイジ". There are some examples which describe the usage of the term that is not limited in mental: --荒巻モロゾフ (talk) 11:40, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Shueisha (2022): "例を出せば、「ガイジ（障害児）」「池沼（知的障害者）」「自宅警備員（ひきこもり）」「ナマポ（生活保護受給者）」といったネット言語があります. "
 * Bunshun (2022): "たとえば、ネットで広まった言葉に「ガイジ（害児）」がある. もともとは障害児に由来するらしいが、今は「嫌な奴」「むかつく奴」という意味合いでつかわれる. "
 * Shimosuwa town, Nagano (2011): "私が小学生の頃、一時期こんな言葉が流行したのです. 「ガイジ」「シンショウ」意味が分からないと思います. 「ガイジ」は障害児. 「シンショウ」は身体障害者を表します. "
 * These examples are not conveying meaning. Is there example where this term is actually used against physically disabled person, or figuratively physically weak person or the like? Usage examples I can find exclusively refer to (figuratively) "insane, crazy person". It only makes sense if it is derived from "mentally disabled" sense.

パチンコ屋って挙動がおかしいガイジ多すぎやろwwwww

飯屋を運動場と間違えてるガイジ家族や椅子で片膝ついて食べる奴らってどういう教育受けてきたんやろうか.

見なけりゃいいのに勝手に頭から肥溜めに突っ込んで挙げ句溺れる真のガイジどもやろマジで怖いわ
 * -- Huhu9001 (talk) 15:50, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
 * "カエルに噛まれて人差し指の第二関節から先が無いけど質問ある？　ガイジになってもたわ "
 * "身体ガイジ手帳は鉄道も半額になるのに、精神ガイジ手帳はならないのおかしくない？😢"
 * "ガーシーとかいう性の喜びおじさんが入ったN党は人格としてガイジが多いし　れいわは身体のガイジだし "
 * --荒巻モロゾフ (talk) 19:42, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Your edit is inapropriate. shohgaisha.com is managed by one company which is not authoritative organization to decide how terms are used. I presented usage examples by major media and municipality, that is more authorized than one company which don't run news media.

And also "知的" is never "mentally", that is only used to refer "intelligent", mentally disorder is "精神障害" in Japanese. The comprehension you've done is misinterpretation from the beginning, or medically inapropriate. Disorders which make people insane is never limited in intelligence disorder (知的障害 / IQ under 70), also mental disorder (精神障害) and developmental disorder (発達障害 / in narrow sense, not including intelligent disability), and even also personality disorder (人格障害), which is not disability under Japanese law, can make them insane. The sort of disabilities is not fixed form the first. They all can make people who's called "ガイジ", and to fix decidedly from made by one company, which can include misunderstandings, is not good.--荒巻モロゾフ (talk) 23:58, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Slangs are not subject to "authoritative organization to decide how terms are used". Also pathological discussion is off-topic because the semantic shift of a slang is not so scientific. -- Huhu9001 (talk) 00:39, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
 * : Wiktionary is a descriptive dictionary based on usage, not authoritative sources (see our Criteria for inclusion. That means we go to whatever place has the usage (not the definition- that's a mention, not a use). We also document the way a term is used- even when it's used in harmful or awful ways. We do our best to let our readers know when a term will offend people, be considered wrong, or will be interpreted in certain ways- but we still document it as it's used. Chuck Entz (talk) 00:48, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Excuse me. I am a bit curious. Did you noticed this thread because you saw it in Recent Changes, or for some other reasons? -- Huhu9001 (talk) 00:54, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
 * I have you on my watchlist, but I make a point of keeping out of most discussions on most of the user talk pages on my watchlist because they're none of my business. I occasionally will weigh in on some kinds of general topics that aren't specific to the user whose page they're on, or in cases where I think I can be of help. In this case I may have misjudged what the discussion was about, exactly. Chuck Entz (talk) 02:19, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
 * The "Criteria for inclusion" you said says:
 * “Attested” means verified through
 * clearly widespread use, or
 * use in permanently recorded media, conveying meaning, in at least three independent instances spanning at least a year (different requirements apply for certain languages).
 * My presentation fulfills the criteria above, while his assertion according only one company's website doesn't. Don't you think so?--荒巻モロゾフ (talk) 01:19, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
 * These rules are applied to terms themselves and their individual senses, not to etymology theories. -- Huhu9001 (talk) 01:30, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Not only that, if your assertion is right, I will can grant this source below which is totally made by a private group of internet users:
 * "知的障害児、精神障害児、発達障害児、身体障害児の略称であり、蔑称. 害児. ただし昨今では本義から離れた、ネット上での誹謗中傷の用語としてよく見られる. "
 * What do you think about? The part "知的" did never contribute to the shortened term anyway, and that part is also interpreted as "精神", "発達" or "身体" according it.--荒巻モロゾフ (talk) 01:52, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
 * This etymology is already in the entry, namely the first etymology theory. -- Huhu9001 (talk) 01:57, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
 * I said that it is not fixed in "知的" after all even if we accept such type of sources. If you didn't understand Japanese sentences well, I'd like to apologise to you because of my badness of explaining foreign language in English without any translation though...--荒巻モロゾフ (talk) 02:19, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
 * The first of the 2 alternative etymology theories in ガイジ does not claim it is "fixed in 知的" either. Isn't that agreeing with the source you mentioned?
 * I fully understand Japanese. There is no such worry. -- Huhu9001 (talk) 02:24, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
 * That is problem of how to display and interpretation. Since that is related to the rule of wiktionary, not only we two's. It's better to ask someone for how to do in this case. Okay?--荒巻モロゾフ (talk) 03:32, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Sure. -- Huhu9001 (talk) 03:36, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
 * I love seeing two argue only for both of them to suddenly dissappear (more concerned on Aramaki though). Chuterix (talk) 00:53, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
 * I don't understand what you are talking. -- Huhu9001 (talk) 10:07, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
 * @荒巻モロゾフ suddenly disappeared in autumn of last year. Chuterix (talk) 14:06, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
 * I don't see any problem with it. Wiktionary is a toy. When people get no more fun from it, they leave. -- Huhu9001 (talk) 16:47, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
 * I see (/s) Chuterix (talk) 20:48, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

title: User talk:Huhu9001


text: O'Neill cylinders

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: O'Neill cylinders


text: 보고타

title: 보고타


text: O'Neill colony

title: O'Neill colony


text: O'Neill colonies

title: O'Neill colonies


text: 姆巴巴納

title: 姆巴巴納


text: 姆巴巴纳

title: 姆巴巴纳


text: 음바바네

title: 음바바네


text: ムババネ

title: ムババネ


text: 瓦加杜古

title: 瓦加杜古


text:
Omega Point

Etymology
The use of to refer to the concept was originated by, in reference to it being the final letter of the Greek alphabet; see.

Noun

 * 1) A maximal level of complexity in the universe, often equated with the Christian God, which some philosophers believe is inevitable.

title: Omega Point


text: 伤亡

title: 伤亡


text:
傷亡

Noun

 * 1) casualties; injuries and deaths

title: 傷亡


text: Omega point

title: Omega point


text:
omega point

Noun

 * 1)  A well-defined point outside the hyperbolic plane.

title: omega point


text: 파라마리보

title: 파라마리보


text: unrouteable

title: unrouteable


text: 키토

title: 키토


text: Tipler machine

title: Tipler machine


text: Tipler machines

title: Tipler machines


text:
Kurzweilian

Adjective

 * 1) Of or relating to  (born 1948), American inventor, author and futurist.

title: Kurzweilian


text: Tipler time machine

title: Tipler time machine


text: 莫羅尼

title: 莫羅尼


text: 莫罗尼

title: 莫罗尼


text:
Tiplerian

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) Of or relating to the ideas of American physicist, especially those regarding the Omega Point of intelligent life in the universe.

title: Tiplerian


text: モロニ

title: モロニ


text: von Neumann machines

title: von Neumann machines


text:
菜食主義

Noun

 * 1) vegetarianism

Derived terms

 * : vegetarian

title: 菜食主義


text:
菜食主義者

Noun

 * 1) a vegetarian

title: 菜食主義者


text:
von Neumann probe

Noun

 * 1)  A von Neumann machine, or machine capable of self-replication, that is sent on interstellar voyages to investigate or terraform.

title: von Neumann probe


text: von Neumann probes

title: von Neumann probes


text: finenesses

title: finenesses


text:
Bracewell probe

Etymology
Named after Australian astronomer, who proposed them in 1960.

Noun

 * 1) A hypothetical machine sent on interstellar voyages to communicate with an alien civilization.

title: Bracewell probe


text: Bracewell probes

title: Bracewell probes


text: Citations:CPU

title: Citations:CPU


text:
รัฐธรรมนูญ

Etymology
From 🇰🇲. . Officially used for the first time in 1932. Formerly known by various terms, including, , , , and merely.

Noun

 * 1)  constitution:
 * 2) fundamental principles according to which a nation is governed.
 * 3) (classifier ) document embodying these principles. Abbreviation:

title: รัฐธรรมนูญ


text:
กฎหมายรัฐธรรมนูญ

Etymology
From, a. Cognate with 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) constitutional law.

title: กฎหมายรัฐธรรมนูญ


text:
ศาลรัฐธรรมนูญ

Etymology
From 🇰🇲;.

Noun

 * 1) constitutional court.

title: ศาลรัฐธรรมนูญ


text:
brăzdar

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) plowshare

title: brăzdar


text:
e-guidance

Noun

 * 1) guidance given via electronic media, especially the Internet

title: e-guidance


text:
e-tutoring

Etymology
or

Noun

 * 1) tutoring via electronic media, especially the Internet

title: e-tutoring


text: dogrobber

title: dogrobber


text: dogrobbers

title: dogrobbers


text:
e-counseling

Etymology
en

Noun

 * 1) counseling delivered via electronic media, especially the Internet

title: e-counseling


text:
brăzda

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to furrow, indent, groove, ridge, flute
 * 2) to notch
 * 3) to plough
 * 4) to mark, score, tally

title: brăzda


text: e-counselling

title: e-counselling


text:
vomirã

Etymology
From.

Noun
(plural vomiri / vomire)

 * 1) plowshare

title: vomirã


text:
semiartificial

Adjective

 * 1) Partly or somewhat artificial.

title: semiartificial


text:
semimanual

Adjective

 * 1) Partly or somewhat manual.

Etymology
From.

title: semimanual


text:
enlister

Noun

 * 1) One who enlists.

title: enlister


text: enlisters

title: enlisters


text:
picunjiu

Etymology
From.

Noun
(plural picunji / picunje)

 * 1) money amassed and put aside for old age

title: picunjiu


text: piculjiu

title: piculjiu


text:
ferronickel

Noun

 * 1) A ferroalloy of iron and nickel.

title: ferronickel


text:
ferromagnesium

Noun

 * 1) A ferroalloy of iron and magnesium.

title: ferromagnesium


text:
ferrophosphorus

Noun

 * 1) A ferroalloy of iron and phosphorus.

title: ferrophosphorus


text:
ferrouranium

Noun

 * 1) A ferroalloy of iron and uranium.

title: ferrouranium


text:
Talk:gyp

Young, female, unbred dog
I ran across this definition recently in a "boy and his dog" novel called Swim For It, Bridget, by Beatrix Moore. I'll have to gather some more attestations, but I believe it is watertight. At coondawgs.com it is defined as a young, female, unbred dog. ~ heyzeuss 04:20, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

title: Talk:gyp


text:
ferrotungsten

Noun

 * 1) A ferroalloy of iron and tungsten.

Translations

 * Catalan: ferrotungstè
 * Finnish: ferrovolframi

title: ferrotungsten


text:
ferroaluminium

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) A ferroalloy of iron and aluminium.

title: ferroaluminium


text:
ferroaluminum

Etymology
From.

title: ferroaluminum


text:
silicomanganese

Noun

 * 1) An alloy consisting mainly of manganese and silicon.

title: silicomanganese


text: deminution

title: deminution


text: Deminution

title: Deminution


text: kangeroo

title: kangeroo


text: kangeroos

title: kangeroos


text:
식생활

Noun

 * 1) eating habits; diet

title: 식생활


text: Category:th:Judiciary

title: Category:th:Judiciary


text:
Diminution

Noun

 * 1) diminution reduction; act or process of making smaller
 * 2)  diminution act or process of making diminutive
 * 3)  diminution

title: Diminution


text:
고혈압

Noun

 * 1) high blood pressure; hypertension

title: 고혈압


text:
정상치

Noun

 * 1) normal value

title: 정상치


text: NSBM

title: NSBM


text:
nabobism

Noun

 * 1) The attitudes or policies of nabobs.

title: nabobism


text:
우리집

Noun

 * 1)  Hanok
 * 2) my house; my family's house
 * 3) my family
 * 1) my family

title: 우리집


text:
bboard

Etymology
Shortening.

Noun

 * 1) bulletin board

title: bboard


text: bboards

title: bboards


text:
sleeper ship

Noun

 * 1)  A spaceship, all or some of whose passengers are in suspended animation.

title: sleeper ship


text:
macrosegment

Noun

 * 1)  A portion of a spoken utterance between two pauses.
 * 2)  A broad division of a market, encompassing many potential customers.

title: macrosegment


text: sleeper ships

title: sleeper ships


text: macrosegments

title: macrosegments


text:
กฎหมาย

Etymology
From 🇰🇲. Compare 🇨🇬 and 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1)  to document; to record; to register; to mark down; to note down; to write down.
 * 2)  to command; to decree; to direct; to instruct; to order; to ordain; to prescribe; to regulate.

Noun

 * 1) law; statute.
 * 2) * John 19:7, KJV:
 * 3) * Psalm 94:20, KJV:
 * 4) * Isaiah 10:1, KJV:
 * 1) * Isaiah 10:1, KJV:
 * 1) * Isaiah 10:1, KJV:

title: กฎหมาย


text:
폐기종

Noun

 * 1)  pulmonary emphysema

title: 폐기종


text: fourgrams

title: fourgrams


text: n-grams

title: n-grams


text:
Dyson tree

Etymology
Named for.

Noun

 * 1)  A hypothetical genetically engineered plant that could grow in a comet.

title: Dyson tree


text: Dyson trees

title: Dyson trees


text:
bioship

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  A spaceship that is partially or wholly composed of biological material.

title: bioship


text: bioships

title: bioships


text:
International Court of Justice

Proper noun

 * 1)  A judicial body of the United Nations, established in 1945 to decide disputes brought by nations.

Translations

 * Afrikaans: Internasionale Geregshof
 * Albanian: Gjykata Ndërkombëtare e Drejtësisë
 * Arabic: مَحْكَمَة الْعَدْلَ الدُّوَلِيَّةِ
 * Armenian: Արդարադատության միջազգային դատարան
 * Azerbaijani: Beynəlxalq ədalət məhkəməsi
 * Basque: Nazioarteko Justizia Auzitegia
 * Belarusian: Міжнародны суд
 * Bengali: আন্তর্জাতিক ন্যায়বিচার আদালত
 * Bulgarian: Международният съд
 * Catalan: Tribunal Internacional de Justícia
 * Chinese:
 * Cantonese: 國際法院
 * Mandarin: 國際法院
 * Czech: Mezinárodní soudní dvůr
 * Danish: Den Internationale Domstol
 * Dutch: Internationaal Gerechtshof
 * Esperanto: Internacia Kortumo
 * Estonian: Rahvusvaheline Kohus
 * Finnish: kansainvälinen tuomioistuin
 * French: Cour internationale de justice
 * Galician: Tribunal Internacional de Xustiza
 * Georgian: საერთაშორისო სასამართლო, მართლმსაჯულების საერთაშორისო სასამართლო, მსოფლიო სასამართლო
 * German:
 * Greek: Διεθνές Δικαστήριο της Δικαιοσύνης
 * Hebrew: בית הדין הבינלאומי לצדק
 * Hindi: अंतरराष्‍ट्रीय न्यायालय
 * Hungarian: Nemzetközi Bíróság
 * Icelandic: Alþjóðadómstóllinn
 * Ido: Internacionala Judicieyo
 * Indonesian: Mahkamah Internasional
 * Irish: An Chúirt Bhreithiúnais Idirnáisiúnta
 * Italian: Corte internazionale di giustizia
 * Japanese: 国際司法裁判所
 * Kannada:
 * Korean: 국제사법재판소
 * Latvian: Starptautiskā tiesa
 * Lithuanian: Tarptautinis Teisingumo Teismas
 * Macedonian: Меѓународниот суд за правда
 * Malay: Mahkamah Keadilan Antarabangsa
 * Malayalam: അന്തർദേശീയ നീതിന്യായ കോടതി
 * Marathi: आंतरराष्ट्रीय न्यायालय
 * Nepali: अन्तर्राष्ट्रिय न्यायालय
 * Norwegian:
 * Bokmål: Den internasjonale domstolen
 * Nynorsk: Den internasjonale domstolen
 * Persian: دیوان بین‌المللی دادگستری
 * Polish: Międzynarodowy Trybunał Sprawiedliwości
 * Portuguese: Tribunal Internacional de Justiça
 * Punjabi: ਕੌਮਾਂਤਰੀ ਇਨਸਾਫ਼ ਅਦਾਲਤ
 * Romanian: Curtea Internațională de Justiție
 * Russian: Международный Суд
 * Serbo-Croatian:
 * Cyrillic: Међународни суд правде
 * Roman: Međunarodni sud pravde
 * Slovak: Medzinárodný súdny dvor
 * Slovene: Meddržavno sodišče
 * Spanish: Corte Internacional de Justicia
 * Swahili: Mahakama ya Kimataifa ya Haki
 * Swedish: Internationella domstolen
 * Tagalog: Pandaigdigang Hukumang Pangkatarungan
 * Tamil: அனைத்துலக நீதிமன்றம்
 * Telugu:
 * Thai: ศาลยุติธรรมระหว่างประเทศ
 * Turkish:
 * Ukrainian: Міжнародний суд
 * Urdu: بین الاقوامی عدالت انصاف, عالمی عدالت
 * Vietnamese: Tòa án Công lý Quốc tế
 * Welsh: Llys Cyfiawnder Rhyngwladol
 * Yiddish: אינטערנאַציאָנאַלע געריכט פֿון יוסטיץ

title: International Court of Justice


text: πληρώνομαι

title: πληρώνομαι


text: πληρώθηκα

title: πληρώθηκα


text:
สหประชาชาติ

Etymology
From 🇰🇲;.

Proper noun

 * 1) United Nations.

title: สหประชาชาติ


text:
öljykulttuuri

Noun

 * 1) oil culture culture and way of life based on excessive consumption of mineral oil

title: öljykulttuuri


text:
argentana

Noun

 * 1) white copper, cupronickel

title: argentana


text:
öljylaiva

Noun

 * 1) oil tanker vessel used to transport large quantities of oil or oil products

title: öljylaiva


text:
launch loop

Noun

 * 1) A hypothetical maglev cable that would be capable of sending objects into orbit without needing a rocket.

title: launch loop


text: launch loops

title: launch loops


text:
Lofstrom loop

Etymology
Named after American engineer.

title: Lofstrom loop


text:
πλησιάζω

Etymology
From. Compare cognate and old.

Verb

 * 1)  bring near
 * 2)  approach
 * 3)  be near, associate with
 * 4)  have sexual intercourse with

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1)  to approach, bring, move closer
 * 2)  to approach
 * 3)  to approach
 * : I am approached, contacted

title: πλησιάζω


text:
สมัชชาใหญ่แห่งสหประชาชาติ

Etymology
From, a calque of 🇨🇬.

Proper noun

 * 1) United Nations General Assembly.

title: สมัชชาใหญ่แห่งสหประชาชาติ


text:
white copper

Noun

 * 1) An alloy of copper with zinc and nickel, having the appearance of silver.

Translations

 * Italian:

title: white copper


text:
argentiera

Noun

 * 1) silver mine

title: argentiera


text:
arginnide

Noun

 * 1) fritillary (butterfly )

title: arginnide


text: 生快

title: 生快


text:
argirite

Noun

 * 1)  argentite

title: argirite


text:
until the last dog is hung

Prepositional phrase

 * 1)  until the last moment.

title: until the last dog is hung


text: προγραμματίζομαι

title: προγραμματίζομαι


text: προγραμματίστηκα

title: προγραμματίστηκα


text:
argironeta

Noun

 * 1) diving bell spider, water spider

title: argironeta


text:
broatic

Etymology
From (with a later change of declension), from  <. Compare 🇨🇬,, 🇨🇬,.

Noun
(plural broatits)

 * 1) frog

title: broatic


text: argirosi

title: argirosi


text:
argomentatore

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) arguer, debater

title: argomentatore


text:
白字

Noun

 * 1) wrongly written or mispronounced (Chinese) character

title: 白字


text:
προετοιμάζω

Etymology
From +.

Verb

 * 1) to get ready beforehand

Etymology
Learnedly, from. .

Verb

 * 1) to coach, train, prepare beforehand

Related terms
&

title: προετοιμάζω


text: broatec

title: broatec


text:
προετοιμάζομαι

Verb

 * 1) to be prepared, ready

title: προετοιμάζομαι


text: προετοιμάστηκα

title: προετοιμάστηκα


text:
板磚

Noun

 * 1)  wall brick

title: 板磚


text: 板砖

title: 板砖


text: προετοίμασα

title: προετοίμασα


text:
毫巴

Noun

 * 1) millibar a non-SI unit of pressure

title: 毫巴


text:
沙特

Adjective

 * 1)  Saudi

title: 沙特


text:
fãric

Etymology
From (which originally had to do with the forging of iron); another possibility it to a  root, from  (compare 🇨🇬). Compare 🇨🇬,.

Verb

 * 1) to shoe a horse

title: fãric


text:
ferec

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) dawn, daybreak

title: ferec


text:
逃離

Verb

 * 1) to run away; to escape; to flee

title: 逃離


text: 逃离

title: 逃离


text:
öljynkeräysalus

Noun

 * 1) oil spill recovery vessel, oil spill response vessel, skimmer vessel equipped to collect spilled oil from the surface of a body of water

title: öljynkeräysalus


text: προστίθεμαι

title: προστίθεμαι


text: 帳號

title: 帳號


text: 帐号

title: 帐号


text: προσθέτομαι

title: προσθέτομαι


text:
支隊

Noun

 * 1)  detachment

Noun

 * 1) military detachment

title: 支隊


text: 支队

title: 支队


text: προστέθηκα

title: προστέθηκα


text:
棄用

Verb

 * 1) to stop using; to abandon

Adjective

 * 1) abandoned, deprecated

title: 棄用


text: 弃用

title: 弃用


text: Eierdotter

title: Eierdotter


text:
Eidotter

Noun

 * 1) egg yolk

title: Eidotter


text:
Template talk:zh-see

Simplified to traditional
When redirecting from a simplified to a traditional form, I rather think the autocollapsed portion should simply be shown to the user without their needing to click [Expand]; after all, any user who goes to a simplified form without realising there will not necessarily know that information. What think you, Wyang? —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 06:31, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't have a strong preference in this, so any format would be fine. Also since we are here, the width of the table seems to warrant an increase as it appears multilined when viewed on a Macbook's Chrome using Tabbed Languages. Wyang (talk) 07:05, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Expanded is better, IMO. No opinion on the width--Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 08:19, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I agree expanded is better. But even more better would be including an auto-redirect for all simplified entries that do not already include JKV readings. Let's think about the majority of Chinese speakers in the world who use simplified on a daily basis and not traditional. ---> Tooironic (talk) 09:50, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I oppose converting to hard redirects. They lack categorisations and for consistency with other entries. We may get a different solution in the future where simplified entries display the contents of traditional entries. Users could live with a single inconvenience - an additional click to get to traditional entries but (regular) users familiar with our setup will choose traditional in the first place. No dictionary (book, electronic or online) ever duplicates contents for each character set, it just happens that traditional is chosen over simplified here. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 03:06, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
 * As long as it looks ok on mobile devices :). That's my only concern. Jamesjiao → T ◊ C 22:07, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

line 29 of Module:zh-see
↑ It looks like this needs to be revised because on 大鱼吃小鱼，小鱼吃虾米, comes out to be 103%. (perhaps  would be better...?) ? —suzukaze (t・c) 22:35, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure familiar with formatting tricks such as these... Wyang (talk) 01:02, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

module error in 观测
When I go to 观测 I see a module error. The exact message: "Script error: The module returned a value. It is supposed to return an export table." At first I thought some bot broke it, but it turns out this error doesn't exist when I look at the article in preview mode. No previous versions, and neither the current version, show the error when looking at it in preview mode. What's going on? Is there something wrong on my side? 汤玛斯 (talk) 12:02, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Something else was broken: . Wyang (talk) 10:50, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

不可胜计
non-standard in Mainland

This can't be right—suzukaze (t・c) 08:06, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

花里胡哨
is being sorted into "Gan lemmas/idioms" for some reason. —suzukaze (t・c) 05:08, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Fixed. Wyang (talk) 23:33, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

"av" vs. "a"
, what's the difference between these two? If it's ancient, isn't it automatically a variant? — justin(r)leung { (t...) 05:05, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

 * My worst fear... it was in fact me who . I can't recall why I did that, but looking at my edits around then, it seems to be that prompted me to do so (to clarify "variant"). I think it should be merged with 'ancient' into , with perhaps the default display of "ancient variant". (entries using) Wyang (talk) 05:14, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

 * More thoughts on this: perhaps the distinction between "ancient/ancient variant" could be whether the glyph was the predominant form in ancient writings. If so, it is "ancient", otherwise it is "ancient variant". Whether this distinction is worth keeping is open to question - it's a bit difficult to verify whether a form was predominant or less common in many cases. Wyang (talk) 05:20, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

variant types
How do variant types in hanzi dictionaries like 同×, 通×, 初文, 古字, 本字, 俗字, 篆字, 略字, etc., translate to code? I've been using  in all circumstances for some time but I fear if some of them should be   or  ... --Dine2016 (talk) 03:20, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Here's my understanding:
 * 同, 俗字, 略字 =.
 * 古字, 篆字 =.
 * 通 needs an actual entry rather than a lot of the times.
 * 初文, 本字 probably means should be used; 本字 is kinda confusing (especially for dialects).
 * I'm not quite sure when to use  to be honest.
 * — justin(r)leung { (t...) 03:32, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Would be an “simplified and ancient form” (which is not in Module:zh-see) of ? --Dine2016 (talk) 08:15, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Redirecting to a specific etymology
The documentation mentions using this template under a specific etymology -- but is it possible to redirect to a specific etymology? e.g. if character X etymology N is a variant form of character Y etymology M. This would be a useful feature. Freelance Intellectual (talk) 08:55, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
 * It's not implemented yet. I've brought this issue on Wyang's talk page, but that page got deleted. I think such a feature would be useful for cases like, → , for copying categories from particular sections (which  does).
 * By the way, I think that if the non-lemma is an ancient or obsolete form, it should be judicious in copying categories. For example, →  shouldn't copy categories from the modern definitions such as Category:Chinese dialectal terms ("very; quite"), Category:Chinese affectionate terms (老 as in 老王), Category:Mainland China Chinese ("short for 老撾"), etc. --Dine2016 (talk) 09:39, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

copying categories to obsolete or ancient forms
Hi. Should the template copy categories more judiciously when it comes to obsolete or ancient forms?

For example, please take a look at Category:zh:Transgender. clearly shouldn't be there.

--Dine2016 (talk) 03:30, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

 * I find it jarring. —Suzukaze-c◇◇ 04:25, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

 * Is there a way to disable variant forms linking to categories? They really shouldn't be in there, since they are not lemmas, just different ways of writing the same word. ---> Tooironic (talk) 10:40, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Another instance: should not copy the particle-related categories of. --Dine2016 (talk) 04:53, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

 * I don't think so. There may be instances where two variant spellings are both in use with competing frequency, and we have chosen one as the lemma arbitrarily. Maybe it's better to distinguish "currently-in-use"/"obsolete" or 全同/非全同? --Dine2016 (talk) 04:57, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

Odd interaction when other templates are used in definition?
On the page 龞, zh-see produces the following message:

For pronunciation and definitions of 龞 – see 鱉 (“soft-shell turtle {{gl| any turtle in the family Trionychidae, especially Pelodiscus sinensis”).

It seems odd that the gloss template is included as text in the definition, and this might be unintended behavior. For reference, the wikitext entry at the page 鱉 is:

soft-shell turtle {{gl|any turtle in the family Trionychidae, especially {{taxlink|Pelodiscus sinensis|species}}}}

I'm wondering if there is a compatibly issue with gloss (since zh-see failed to produce the parentheses and instead just wrote the template), or if it has to do with there being a taxlink template inside of the gloss template, and this nesting has somehow disrupts zh-see. I'm not very familiar with this, but I don't think it should be the former because a broad compatibility issue would have likely been caught long ago. Either way it appears that zh-see is not producing the text one would expect, but please correct me if I'm wrong. ChromeGames923 (talk) 06:57, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

 * {{re|ChromeGames923}} Yes, this is an issue that I think most Chinese editors are aware of, but haven't really bothered fixing. It does have to do with nesting templates, which this template is really bad at dealing with. — justin(r)leung {{sub|{ (t...) | c=› }}} 07:26, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

{{ping|Justinrleung}} I see, thanks for letting me know. In the end it's not particularly problematic but I was just surprised to see how it rendered. Thanks, ChromeGames923 (talk) 22:58, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

{{ping|Justinrleung}} Just noticed the same issue on 上声:

 * For pronunciation and definitions of {{l|zh|上}}{{l|zh|声}} – see {{l|zh|上聲}} (“rising tone {{gl| one of the four tones in Middle Chinese, also a tone in various modern varieties, e.g. tone 3 in Standard Mandarin, tone 3 in Meixian Hakka, and tone 2 in Xiamen/Taiwanese Hokkien”).

While the wikitext at {{l|zh|上聲}} reads:

 * # {{lb|zh|Chinese phonetics}} rising tone {{gl|one of the four tones in Middle Chinese, also a tone in various modern varieties, e.g. tone 3 ({{IPAchar|/˨˩˦/}}) in Standard Mandarin (marked with a caron [ ˇ ] in Hanyu Pinyin and bopomofo), tone 3 in Meixian Hakka ({{IPAchar|/˧˩/}}), and tone 2 in Xiamen/Taiwanese Hokkien ({{IPAchar|/˥˧/}})}}

zh-see appears to be stripping the lb template as well as parentheses and their contents. Curiously, since the nested templates (IPAchar in this case) are all enclosed in parentheses, it shouldn't even be seeing the nesting. If it were simply a case of zh-see not keeping track of curly brace depth correctly, I would expect the definition line to mangled much worse than it is. 173.71.88.220 22:09, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Simplified form of variant form
How do I force this template to say "A is the simplified form of B, which is a variant form of C"?

Usually if I leave the second parameter blank this relationship gets automatically detected, but it didn't work on 厘订. If you remove the second parameter (currently I set it to "s") then it will claim that 厘订 is a variant form of 釐訂, which is obviously false from the second character. The template seems to be latching on to the fact that 厘 is a variant of 釐 and ignoring the presence of simplified 订. ChromeGames923 (talk) 06:19, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
 * It seems to be an issue with the presence of 厘订 in the source code in 釐定. I'm not entirely sure what the best solution is other than the fact that 訂 isn't pronounced the same as 定 in Cantonese, which would mean 釐訂 might need to be a full entry. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 23:16, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I see, since the pronunciation could be different it might not actually be an alternative form, but rather a synonym. I think I understand that distinction better now. That being said, I'm not sure why that would cause this template to misunderstand the relationship between the simplified and traditional forms. I have a feeling that Wiktionary thinks the simplified form of 釐訂 is 釐订, since that it what it will list automatically (in derived terms, alternative forms, etc.) when it comes up. So maybe that makes it think that 厘订 is a variant (of the "simplified" 釐订). ChromeGames923 (talk) 23:35, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
 * The way detects things is by looking at . Since 釐定 had,   was detected as being in the parameter alt, which would make it a "variant" (because of Module:zh-see). — justin(r)leung { (t...) 23:44, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
 * We need to "hard-code" the simplified form because 釐 doesn't always simplify to 厘. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 23:45, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I appreciate the explanation, I think I understand now: because usually the simplified form is not hard-coded so it is technically not in the alt parameter, it just displays there when rendered. In that case, might it make sense to modify so that simplified forms (those preceded by a slash) are not detected as variants but rather as being simplified? And indeed, I actually just fixed the simplified forms of 釐 in its derived terms for the reason of it not simplifying all the time. Thanks, ChromeGames923 (talk) 00:12, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Perhaps it would make sense to change to code to detect it a little more smartly, but I'm not sure if all things after a slash would be simplified. I can think of the case where there could be trad/trad2/simp. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 00:19, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
 * You're right, there could be many different cases that might be hard to account for. Then it might be nice to be able to manually input two-step links into, but it's not a major issue. ChromeGames923 (talk) 02:32, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Hakka Pha̍k-fa-sṳ
Just like how Min Nan has "poj" Pe̍h-ōe-jī code, Hakka should have a "pfs" Pha̍k-fa-sṳ code, for example for khî and sṳ̀ Liggliluff (talk) 11:20, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
 * PFS entries are disallowed by our current consensus, which is at WT:AZH. Unlike POJ, PFS does not seem to have much use outside of church publication (and Wikimedia projects). — justin(r)leung { (t...) 14:00, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting me know, I should refrain from adding those Liggliluff (talk) 18:46, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Incorrect behavior when target page contains multiple zh-see redirects
When the target page itself contains multiple zh-see templates, targeting it will automatically redirect to the last entry. For example, on the page for simplified, this template incorrectly points you to the page , when in fact the proper behavior would be to just point towards the traditional form , which then links to either or. ChromeGames (talk) 06:25, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

title: Template talk:zh-see


text:
mpartu

Etymology
From (variant of ), from. Compare 🇨🇬,.

Verb

 * 1) to divide, split up, separate
 * 2) to share, distribute, apportion, assign, dole, impart

title: mpartu


text: împart

title: împart


text:
trạm xe buýt

Etymology
+

Noun

 * 1) bus stop

title: trạm xe buýt


text:
bến xe buýt

Etymology
🇰🇲.

Noun

 * 1) bus station

title: bến xe buýt


text:
öljynimeytysaine

Noun

 * 1) oil absorbent any solid material used to absorb an oil spill

title: öljynimeytysaine


text:
lämpökynttilä

Noun

 * 1) tealight, tea light small candle cast inside a thin metal cup allowing the wax to melt completely when the candle is lit

title: lämpökynttilä


text:
sửa chữa

Etymology
🇰🇲.

Verb

 * 1) to repair

title: sửa chữa


text:
nghén

Adjective

 * 1) to be pregnant

Verb

 * 1) to have morning sickness

title: nghén


text:
孕吐

Verb

 * 1)  to have morning sickness

title: 孕吐


text:
입덧

Etymology
Possibly from +.

Noun

 * 1) morning sickness

title: 입덧


text:
öljytuikku

Noun

 * 1) oil candle small light comparable to a candle, consisting of an oil bottle or vessel and a wick that goes through the cap of the bottle

title: öljytuikku


text: Category:nrf:Rivers

title: Category:nrf:Rivers


text:
ปัญญาอ่อน

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1)  intellectually disabled.
 * 2)  idiotic; stupid.

Noun

 * 1)  intellectual disability.
 * 2)  idiocy; stupidity
 * 3)  idiot; stupid person.

title: ปัญญาอ่อน


text:
กฎหมายระหว่างประเทศ

Etymology
From, a calque of 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) international law.

title: กฎหมายระหว่างประเทศ


text:
กฎหมายปกครอง

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) administrative law.

title: กฎหมายปกครอง


text:
กฎหมายมหาชน

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) public law.

title: กฎหมายมหาชน


text:
سفال

Etymology
origins. Cognate with 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) earthenware
 * 2) shard
 * 3) roof tile
 * 4) nutshell

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) earthenware; terracotta
 * 2) earth; clay, soil
 * 3) vase, pot; cover, shell
 * 4) tile; shard

title: سفال


text:
ariballo

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) aryballos

title: ariballo


text:
reyoume

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  kingdom

title: reyoume


text:
rouoyanme

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  kingdom

title: rouoyanme


text:
royaûme

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  kingdom

title: royaûme


text:
กฎหมายเอกชน

Etymology
🇰🇲; . Cognate with 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) private law.

title: กฎหมายเอกชน


text:
aryballos

Etymology
Borrowed from.

Noun

 * 1) A small Ancient Greek flask used to hold perfume or oil.
 * 2) An Incan ceramic vessel with long neck, bulbous body, two handles, and pointed bottom.

Translations

 * Catalan: aríbal
 * Finnish: aryballos
 * French:
 * German: Aryballos
 * Greek:
 * Hungarian:
 * Italian: ariballo
 * Polish: aryballos
 * Portuguese: aríbalo
 * Russian:
 * Spanish: aríbalo

title: aryballos


text: aryballoi

title: aryballoi


text:
arieggiamento

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) airing, ventilation
 * 2) aeration

title: arieggiamento


text:
arillo

Noun

 * 1)  aril

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) wooden ring of usually three to four centimeters wide, used to hold together the clerical collars of ecclesiastics
 * 2) earring

title: arillo


text:
เอกชน

Etymology
From +.

Adjective

 * 1) individual; personal; private; not of an official or public character.

Noun

 * 1) individual.

title: เอกชน


text:
arimannia

Noun

 * 1) a group of arimanno warriors

title: arimannia


text: Riviéthe dé Janvyi

title: Riviéthe dé Janvyi


text:
arimanno

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) a soldier in Longibard Italy

title: arimanno


text:
Riviéthe dé l'Engoulême

Proper noun

 * 1)  Thames

title: Riviéthe dé l'Engoulême


text:
aringo

Noun

 * 1) a circular field, used in medieval times for tournaments etc.
 * 2) race, tournament, trial
 * 1) race, tournament, trial

title: aringo


text: arenghi

title: arenghi


text:
arinia

Noun

 * 1)  arrhinia

title: arinia


text: arioeuropeo

title: arioeuropeo


text: ariosteo

title: ariosteo


text: aristofaneo

title: aristofaneo


text:
คณะตุลาการ

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) tribunal.

title: คณะตุลาการ


text:
aristofanio

Adjective

 * 1) Aristophanean

title: aristofanio


text:
aritmomanzia

Noun

 * 1) arithmancy

title: aritmomanzia


text:
arizotonico

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1)  arrhizotonic

title: arizotonico


text:
rizotonico

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1)  rhizotonic

title: rizotonico


text:
คณะรัฐมนตรี

Etymology
From, literally "council of ministers".

Noun

 * 1) a cabinet (a group of ministers or executives responsible for the government of a nation).

title: คณะรัฐมนตรี


text:
agritchulteure

Etymology
Borrowed from, from +.

Noun

 * 1)  agriculture

title: agritchulteure


text: 产房

title: 产房


text:
arlotto

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  beggar

title: arlotto


text:
產房

Noun

 * 1) delivery room; labour ward

title: 產房


text: 利伯維爾

title: 利伯維爾


text: 利伯维尔

title: 利伯维尔


text: リーブルヴィル

title: リーブルヴィル


text:
老實說

Adverb

 * 1) to be honest; to tell the truth; if I'm honest

title: 老實說


text: 老实说

title: 老实说


text: 리브르빌

title: 리브르빌


text:
ตุลาการภิวัตน์

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) judicial activism.

title: ตุลาการภิวัตน์


text: ตุลาการภิวัฒน์

title: ตุลาการภิวัฒน์


text:
républyique

Etymology
From, from.

Noun

 * 1)  republic

title: républyique


text:
熊孩子

Noun

 * 1)  naughty child; brat

title: 熊孩子


text:
all Sir Garnet

Etymology
From Sir Garnet Wolseley (1833–1913), a popular and successful general in the during the second half of the 19th century.

Adjective

 * 1)  In order; perfect.

title: all Sir Garnet


text:
โลกาภิวัตน์

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) globalisation.

title: โลกาภิวัตน์


text: โลกาภิวัฒน์

title: โลกาภิวัฒน์


text:
激光唱片

Noun

 * 1) compact disc

title: 激光唱片


text:
激光視盤

Noun

 * 1) laser disc

title: 激光視盤


text: 激光视盘

title: 激光视盘


text:
鐳射影碟

Noun

 * 1) laser disc

title: 鐳射影碟


text: 镭射影碟

title: 镭射影碟


text:
視盤

Noun

 * 1)  disk information storage device
 * 2)  optic disc

title: 視盤


text: 视盘

title: 视盘


text:
影碟

Noun

 * 1) video disk
 * 2) VCD
 * 3) DVD

title: 影碟


text:
qùaire

Etymology
From (compare 🇨🇬), from, from , from  +.

Noun

 * 1)  chair

title: qùaire


text:
tchaire

Etymology
From (compare 🇨🇬), from, from , from  +.

Noun

 * 1)  chair

Verb

 * 1) to fall

title: tchaire


text:
ژګاګ

Noun

 * 1) skunk

title: ژګاګ


text: Category:cjs:Plants

title: Category:cjs:Plants


text:
честек

Noun
, честектер (çestekter)

 * 1) berry

title: честек


text:
öljypellava

Noun

 * 1) Any cultivar of flax that is specifically bred to produce raw material for linseed oil production.

title: öljypellava


text:
pellavaöljy

Noun

 * 1) linseed oil oil extracted from flax seeds, used as a drying agent in paints, varnishes etc.

title: pellavaöljy


text:
théatre

Etymology
Borrowed from (compare 🇨🇬), from, from.

Noun

 * 1)  theater

title: théatre


text:
théyâte

Etymology
Borrowed from (compare 🇨🇬), from, from.

Noun

 * 1)  theater

title: théyâte


text:
аңчы

Etymology
Compare to 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, etc.

Noun

 * 1) hunter

Etymology
. Cognate with 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) hunter

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) hunter

title: аңчы


text:
کاپيوره

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) capybara

title: کاپيوره


text: Category:Pashto terms with audio links

title: Category:Pashto terms with audio links


text:
chim'naïe

Etymology
From, from.

Noun

 * 1)  chimney

title: chim'naïe


text:
chimnee

Etymology
From, from.

Noun

 * 1)  chimney

title: chimnee


text:
ringte

Verb

 * 1)  (Verb 1)

title: ringte


text:
număr de telefon

Noun

 * 1) telephone number

title: număr de telefon


text: ringende

title: ringende


text: Category:ro:Telephony

title: Category:ro:Telephony


text:
빅토리아

Etymology
From.

title: 빅토리아


text:
پاڼه

Noun

 * 1) leaf
 * 2) paper
 * 3) sheet

title: پاڼه


text: 聖多美

title: 聖多美


text: 圣多美

title: 圣多美


text:
サントメ

Etymology
From.

Proper noun

 * 1) São Tomé

title: サントメ


text:
προστατεύω

Verb

 * 1) to protect, safeguard
 * 2) to give patronage to

title: προστατεύω


text: 상투메

title: 상투메


text: προστατεύομαι

title: προστατεύομαι


text: προστατεύτηκα

title: προστατεύτηκα


text:
มติมหาชน

Etymology
. Same as.

Noun

 * 1) a public opinion.

title: มติมหาชน


text: προστάτεψα

title: προστάτεψα


text: 馬拉博

title: 馬拉博


text: 马拉博

title: 马拉博


text: 말라보

title: 말라보


text: Category:ro:Telecommunications

title: Category:ro:Telecommunications


text: マラボ

title: マラボ


text: Category:ro:Electronics

title: Category:ro:Electronics


text: 洛美

title: 洛美


text: 로메

title: 로메


text: ロメ

title: ロメ


text:
مسه

Etymology
Shortening of, from , from.

Noun

 * 1) crocodile

title: مسه


text:
利隆圭

Etymology
From.

title: 利隆圭


text:
リロングウェ

Etymology
Borrowed from.

title: リロングウェ


text:
릴롱궤

Etymology
Borrowed from.

title: 릴롱궤


text: gåfva

title: gåfva


text: 아부자

title: 아부자


text:
拉哥斯

Proper noun

 * 1)  Lagos port former capital of Nigeria

title: 拉哥斯


text: ラゴス

title: ラゴス


text:
라고스

Etymology
, from.

title: 라고스


text:
양곤

Proper noun

 * 1) Yangon largest city in Myanmar and the former capital

title: 양곤


text: 坎帕拉

title: 坎帕拉


text:
ประชามติ

Etymology
From + ; literally "people's resolution". Cognate with 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1)  plebiscite; referendum.
 * 2) * 1949, รัฐธรรมนูญแห่งราชอาณาจักรไทย (พุทธศักราช ๒๔๙๒):
 * "th"

- มาตรา ๑๗๖ บุคคลผู้มีสิทธิเลือกตั้งสมาชิกสภาผู้แทนย่อมมีสิทธิออกเสียงประชามติ หลักเกณฑ์และวิธีการออกเสียงประชามติให้เป็นไปตามกฎหมายว่าด้วยการนั้น

 * 1) * 2007, รัฐธรรมนูญแห่งราชอาณาจักรไทย (พุทธศักราช ๒๕๕๐):
 * "th"

- มาตรา ๑๖๕ ประชาชนผู้มีสิทธิเลือกตั้งย่อมมีสิทธิออกเสียงประชามติ

 * 1) * 2014,, ชีวิตและทางเลือก, เนชั่นบุ๊คส์, ISBN 9786165155991, page 317:
 * "th"

- ทางการเครมลินได้จัดการลงประชามติเพื่อการแยกตัวของไครเมียซึ่งประชาชนที่ไม่ได้พูดภาษารัสเซียต่างพากันคว่ำบาตร...ขณะที่สมัชชาใหญ่แห่งสหประชาชาติได้ประณามการลงประชามติในช่วงปลายเดือนมีนาคมด้วยคะแนนเสียงท่วมท้น

 * 1) * 2014,, ไชน่ามูน, , ISBN 9786160421534, page 231:
 * "th"

- ลีกวนยูเห็นว่า การผนวกประเทศกับสหพันธรัฐที่ตั้งขึ้นมาใหม่จะเป็นหนทางให้หลุดพ้นจากอำนาจของอังกฤษ...ประชาชนถึงร้อยละ ๗๐ ลงประชามติให้ความสนับสนุน โดยมีเสียงคัดค้านบางส่วนจากฝ่ายที่นิยมคอมมิวนิสต์

 * 1) * 2016, รัฐธรรมนูญแห่งราชอาณาจักรไทย (ฉบับชั่วคราว) พุทธศักราช ๒๕๕๗ แก้ไขเพิ่มเติม (ฉบับที่ ๒) พุทธศักราช ๒๕๕๙:
 * "th"

- มาตรา ๓ ให้ยกเลิกความในวรรคสามของมาตรา ๓๙/๑ ของรัฐธรรมนูญแห่งราชอาณาจักรไทย (ฉบับชั่วคราว) พุทธศักราช ๒๕๕๗...และให้ใช้ความต่อไปนี้แทน "เมื่อคณะกรรมการร่างรัฐธรรมนูญจัดทำร่างรัฐธรรมนูญเสร็จแล้ว ให้แจ้งคณะรัฐมนตรีและสภานิติบัญญัติแห่งชาติทราบ และให้คณะรัฐมนตรีแจ้งคณะกรรมการการเลือกตั้งทราบโดยเร็ว เพื่อดำเนินการจัดให้มีการออกเสียงประชามติตามมาตรานี้

title: ประชามติ


text: カンパラ

title: カンパラ


text:
накипеть

Verb

 * 1) to form bubbles/foam/scum
 * 2) to seethe, to boil

title: накипеть


text: 캄팔라

title: 캄팔라


text: ダルエスサラーム

title: ダルエスサラーム


text: 다르에스살람

title: 다르에스살람


text: Дар-эс-Салам

title: Дар-эс-Салам


text: ポルトノボ

title: ポルトノボ


text: 포르토노보

title: 포르토노보


text:
มติมหาโจร

Etymology
From ; literally meaning "opinion of a great outlaw" or "opinion of the majority of the outlaws"; mocking the term.

Noun

 * 1)  majority opinion or public opinion that is corrupt, debased, evil, immoral, etc.

title: มติมหาโจร


text:
科托努

Proper noun

 * 1) Cotonou the de facto capital of Benin

title: 科托努


text:
コトヌー

Proper noun

 * 1) Cotonou the de facto capital of Benin

title: コトヌー


text:
納妾

Verb

 * 1) to take a concubine

title: 納妾


text: 纳妾

title: 纳妾


text: 普拉亞

title: 普拉亞


text: 普拉亚

title: 普拉亚


text: 코토누

title: 코토누


text:
プライア

Etymology
Borrowed from.

title: プライア


text: 프라이아

title: 프라이아


text:
篤學

Verb

 * 1)  to be eager to study; to be fond of learning; to be studious; to be scholarly

title: 篤學


text: 笃学

title: 笃学


text: 라파스

title: 라파스


text: 開雲

title: 開雲


text: 开云

title: 开云


text: カイエンヌ

title: カイエンヌ


text:
vòi

Etymology 1
From, from. Related to.

Noun

 * 1)  a
 * 2)  any tube-like organ
 * 3)  a
 * 1)  a
 * 1)  a

Verb

 * 1) to clamour for; to exact; to demand

title: vòi


text: 朱巴

title: 朱巴


text:
nombrîn

Etymology
From, from , from.

Noun

 * 1)  navel, belly button

title: nombrîn


text: ジュバ

title: ジュバ


text:
naombrin

Etymology
From, from , from.

Noun

 * 1)  navel, belly button

title: naombrin


text:
nõmbri

Etymology
From, from , from.

Noun

 * 1)  navel, belly button

title: nõmbri


text: 주바

title: 주바


text:
öljynkuljetus

Noun

 * 1) oil transport, oil transportation

title: öljynkuljetus


text: 普里什蒂納

title: 普里什蒂納


text: 普里什蒂纳

title: 普里什蒂纳


text: プリシュティナ

title: プリシュティナ


text: 프리슈티나

title: 프리슈티나


text: ディリ

title: ディリ


text: 딜리

title: 딜리


text: 아부다비

title: 아부다비


text: 말레

title: 말레


text: 리야드

title: 리야드


text:
偏遠

Adjective

 * 1) faraway; remote; outlying

title: 偏遠


text: 偏远

title: 偏远


text:
亢奮

Adjective

 * 1) extremely excited; exhilarated

title: 亢奮


text: 亢奋

title: 亢奋


text:
ачынмас

Adjective

 * 1) ruthless

title: ачынмас


text: تخن

title: تخن


text: misbruker

title: misbruker


text:
диспутировать

Verb

 * 1) to debate (mostly used in scholarly settings)

Conjugation
imperfective

perfective

title: диспутировать


text:
număr atomic

Noun

 * 1) atomic number

title: număr atomic


text: misbrukte

title: misbrukte


text: misbrukt

title: misbrukt


text: misbrukende

title: misbrukende


text:
ครอง

Etymology
From or. Cognate with Modern 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1) to rule; to administer; to govern.
 * 2) to own; to possess; to occupy.
 * 3)  to don; to dress; to wear.
 * 4) to maintain; to support; to sustain.
 * 5) to maintain, conduct, or manage (someone or something in a certain way or condition).
 * 1) to own; to possess; to occupy.
 * 2)  to don; to dress; to wear.
 * 3) to maintain; to support; to sustain.
 * 4) to maintain, conduct, or manage (someone or something in a certain way or condition).
 * 1)  to don; to dress; to wear.
 * 2) to maintain; to support; to sustain.
 * 3) to maintain, conduct, or manage (someone or something in a certain way or condition).
 * 1) to maintain; to support; to sustain.
 * 2) to maintain, conduct, or manage (someone or something in a certain way or condition).
 * 1) to maintain; to support; to sustain.
 * 2) to maintain, conduct, or manage (someone or something in a certain way or condition).
 * 1) to maintain, conduct, or manage (someone or something in a certain way or condition).
 * 1) to maintain, conduct, or manage (someone or something in a certain way or condition).
 * 1) to maintain, conduct, or manage (someone or something in a certain way or condition).

title: ครอง


text:
Category:Shor verbs

ko:분류:동사(쇼르어) hu:Kategória:sór igék ru:Категория:Шорские глаголы tr:Kategori:Eylem (Şorca)

title: Category:Shor verbs


text:
парарға

Verb

 * 1) to go

title: парарға


text:
тударға

Verb

 * 1) to hold

title: тударға


text:
اتقى

Etymology
Compare.

Verb

 * 1)  to guard oneself against

title: اتقى


text:
توقى

Etymology 1
Compare.

Verb

 * 1)  to be wary of

title: توقى


text:
рассуждать

Verb

 * 1) to argue, to reason
 * 2) to debate, to discuss

title: рассуждать


text:
والى

Etymology
Compare.

Verb

 * 1) to be a friend, a helper, a supporter, a patron, a protector
 * 2) to help, aid, assist
 * 3) to follow immediately, to be subsequent
 * 4)  to sponsor
 * 5)  to keep doing, to do constantly

title: والى


text:
أولى

Etymology 1
Compare.

Verb

 * 1)  to entrust to

Etymology 2
from.

Adjective

 * 1) nearer; nearest
 * 2) worthier; worthiest
 * 3) more appropriate; most appropriate
 * 1) more appropriate; most appropriate

Pronoun

 * 1) these;

title: أولى


text:
تولى

Etymology 1
Compare.

Verb

 * 1) to take charge of, to take control of
 * 2) to be invested with power, to govern, to administer
 * 3) to be nominated, be appointed
 * 4) to turn the back, yield, take to flight, turn away
 * 5) to remove to a distance, desist, give up
 * 6) to be an ally
 * 7) * Qur'an 5:56
 * 8) * "ar"
 * 1) * "ar"

- وَمَن يَتَوَلَّ ٱللَّهَ وَرَسُولَهُۥ وَٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُوا۟ فَإِنَّ حِزْبَ ٱللَّهِ هُمُ ٱلْغَـٰلِبُونَ

Noun

 * 1) hail

title: تولى


text:
توالى

Etymology 1
Compare.

Verb

 * 1)  to occur successively

title: توالى


text:
استولى

Etymology
Compare.

Verb

 * 1)  to appropriate

title: استولى


text:
брысь

Interjection

 * 1) shoo! (to make a cat go away)

title: брысь


text: mjauer

title: mjauer


text: mjaua

title: mjaua


text:
kilpirauhasen liikatoiminta

Noun

 * 1)  hyperthyroidism

title: kilpirauhasen liikatoiminta


text:
სიკუდილი

Etymology
From,. Compare and  from the same source.

Noun

 * 1) death

title: სიკუდილი


text: mjauet

title: mjauet


text: mjauende

title: mjauende


text: stafning

title: stafning


text:
زباتل

Verb

 * 1)  to remind someone of the favour you have done for them

title: زباتل


text:
可用

Verb

 * 1) to be able to be used; to be available

Adjective

 * 1) available; usable

title: 可用


text: afdelning

title: afdelning


text: stafva

title: stafva


text: Wiktionary:Foreign Word of the Day/2015/April


text: Wiktionary:Foreign Word of the Day/2015/April 1


text:
armeggiatore

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) warrior

title: armeggiatore


text:
引述

Verb

 * 1) to quote

title: 引述


text:
電線杆

Noun

 * 1) utility pole

title: 電線杆


text: 电线杆

title: 电线杆


text:
電線桿

Noun

 * 1)  utility pole

title: 電線桿


text:
Rhymes:English/iːlə

Pronunciation
-ēlə, /-iːlə/, /-i:l@/

Two syllables

 * Nila
 * vela

Three syllables

 * candela

Four syllables

 * Coahuila

title: Rhymes:English/iːlə


text:
palo del telefono

Noun

 * 1) telephone pole

title: palo del telefono


text:
palo del telegrafo

Noun

 * 1) telegraph pole

title: palo del telegrafo


text:
сболтнуть

Verb

 * 1)  to just happen to say something, to say something silly (or wrong), to blurt out

title: сболтнуть


text: 電線杆兒

title: 電線杆兒


text: 電線桿兒

title: 電線桿兒


text: 电线杆儿

title: 电线杆儿


text:
armerista

Noun

 * 1)  armorial

title: armerista


text:
دړد

Noun

 * 1) pain
 * 2) ache

title: دړد


text:
電話線

Noun

 * 1) telephone wire
 * 2) telephone line

title: 電話線


text: 电话线

title: 电话线


text:
armilustro

Noun

 * 1) armilustrum

title: armilustro


text:
armilustrum

Noun

 * 1)  A festival, in Ancient Rome, in honour of Mars, the god of war.

Translations

 * Italian: armilustro

title: armilustrum


text: mjauene

title: mjauene


text:
armipotente

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) powerful with weapons, armipotent
 * 2) bellicose

Adjective

 * 1)  armipotent powerful in battle

title: armipotente


text:
دړ

Noun

 * 1) pain
 * 2) ache

title: دړ


text:
armonistico

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1)  harmonistic (relating to harmony)

title: armonistico