text:
Talk:Coat of arms of the United Kingdom

Tudor Crown
Since the royal cypher of Charles III has been recently revealed, should the crown in the UK coat of arms (outside Scotland) be changed to reflect this? Under Elizabeth II, the St Edward's Crown was used as the symbol of the Crown across the Commonwealth realms as seen in numerous government emblems, badges, uniforms, mailboxes, etc. Prior to her reign, the Tudor Crown was in use in both the royal cyphers and the coats of arms of the monarchs before her. Now, the Tudor Crown has replaced the St Edward's Crown in the royal cypher of Charles III. I hope that this will not be misconstrued as a call to immediately change the crown in the coat of arms but as a starting point in considering what we should do about it. 103.196.139.123 (talk) 05:27, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

 * I concur with this viewpoint. As soon as the new arms are revealed we should have new versions ready and waiting. TheCurrencyGuy (talk) 17:22, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

 * Acccording to the College of Arms, the Tudor crown is to be used in representations of the royal arms: https://www.college-of-arms.gov.uk/news-grants/news/item/205-royal-cypher

The form of stylised Crown used in His Majesty’s cypher is what is sometimes termed a ‘Tudor Crown’ and differs from the stylised Crown used by the late Queen Elizabeth II which, with its higher and dipping arches, was closer in form to St Edward’s Crown. It is envisaged that the form of the Crown seen in the new cypher will be adopted as the form used in representations of the Royal Arms and in Military and Crown Badges in the new reign.

Cordyceps-Zombie (talk) 19:59, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Possible arms
These files are possible replacements, They are based on those used 1837-1952:

Would the arms of His Majesty’s Government even need to be changed? The only example I can find of the proposed version is by the London Gazette pre-Elizabeth II. I only mention this as I just watched a Pathé video of Queen Elizabeth (the Queen Mum) launching Queen Elizabeth (the ship) in 1938. On the banner just hanging in front of Her Majesty seemed to be the coat of arms with a St Edward’s Crown, not Tudor. I can’t think of anywhere else I might find usages of the Government arms as opposed to royal, with the seventy year time span making it difficult. Of course we shouldn’t get ahead of ourselves, but I nonetheless found it worth noting. --Estar8806 (talk) 03:40, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

 * Here are recently issued Letters Patent which use the Tudor Crown and the less stylised harp: https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-northern-ireland-63828321
 * 89.101.0.146 (talk) 13:40, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
 * I also saw this and think this is the most official indication yet. I don't know if Sodacan could make a version that resembles the one in the Royal Charter. It would be the HM Government version above with the ornate harp of Northern Ireland. Gualtherus (talk) 07:54, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Has the Royal coat of arms of the United Kingdom officially announced that it has changed? The coat of arms used in many articles has been replaced with the 1837 version. 2401:E180:8880:1D58:95EA:99B4:52CE:174B (talk) 13:54, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Boutell or not Boutell
An indented paragraph of the blazon is attributed to Brooke-Little's edition of Boutell's Heraldry, 1978. I happen to have that same edition, and cannot find that literal paragraph anywhere in the chapter cited (pp 205–222), though of course each of its components is there; so the quotation format is misleading. —Tamfang (talk) 19:20, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

New Royal coat of arms of the United Kingdom (2023)
Has the Royal coat of arms of the United Kingdom officially announced that it has changed? The coat of arms used in many articles has been replaced with the 1837 version. 2401:E180:8882:B04B:C6FE:E83B:24E1:8F46 (talk) 02:28, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

 * I haven't found any announcements about the new coat of arms of the Royal coat of arms of the United Kingdom and Royal UK.com hasn't been updated yet. 2401:E180:8884:8DDA:ACAA:B122:8DF0:F2D9 (talk) 04:24, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

 * There has been no announcement that there will be a reversion to the 1837 coat of arms. It has been announced that the depiction of the Crown (outside of Scotland) is changing from St Edward's Crown to the Tudor Crown, however images released so far have continued to use the 1952 harp. For example, see here. Unless there are further announcements then the escutcheon will stay the same as the current (1952-) version. As the arms used in Scotland already used the Crown of Scotland there will be no changes to the Scottish version of the arms. Ebonelm (talk) 22:13, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Because the coat of arms in more than one article has been replaced with the 1837 version I suggest that the 1952 version should continue to be used until the new coat of arms is officially published. 61.216.108.177 (talk) 03:48, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
 * On all of the other articles, they have been reverted back to the 1952 version as there were no reliable sources that verified that the coat of arms changed to the 1837 version. Wikipedia articles and what other editors say, are not reliable sources. DDMS123 (talk) 17:52, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
 * understand 2401:E180:8830:84AA:6091:D90A:5B35:AA58 (talk) 04:08, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Do you think we should update the current main file or will we replace all the images in the article with new files. 2401:E180:8881:8094:A022:8244:C7FB:ADC4 (talk) 18:47, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I agree with you probably only the crown on the Royal coat of arms of the United Kingdom will be replaced, the 1952 version of the harp will probably continue to be used. 61.216.108.177 (talk) 03:51, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes. But when will that happen? RicLightning (talk) 17:43, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
 * The new crown was used on letters patent granting city states at some point early this year or last year. It is also in use on the invitation to the King's and Queen's coronation. I imagine it's just a matter of us waiting for a graphic to be produced. I don't know generally does that (I think @Sodacan does some of that). Estar8806 (talk) 22:55, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Last year, Sodacan wanted to wait until it was officially confirmed. Now more and more official documents use this pattern. It may be time to prepare to update the coat of arms. 2401:E180:8883:EDC:1DFA:790E:E690:DCC2 (talk) 04:13, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * So what does that mean exactly? The 1837 version? Or just the 1952 version gets updated? I'm seriously curious. RicLightning (talk) 04:28, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Sodacan will probably update it the same way he updated Badge of the House of Windsor last year.
 * It is easier to update from the 1952 version 2401:E180:8883:EDC:1DFA:790E:E690:DCC2 (talk) 04:36, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * It will not be the 1837 version. It will be the 1952 version simply with St Edward's Crown replaced by a Tudor one. The 1837 version contains a more ornate harp and a different compartment to the 1952 one, and it seems that King Charles has opted to retain the latter. Estar8806 (talk) 21:28, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * The letters of patent and the official invitation to the Coronation do appear to confirm this. Valethske (talk) 03:17, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I think we should file File:Royal Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom.svg
 * Renamed to File:Royal Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom (St. Edward's Crown).svg.
 * At present, there are still many places where the coat of arms still uses St. Edward's Crown and has not been updated to Tudor crown. 2401:E180:8861:B289:5365:C296:4276:54C1 (talk) 17:50, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Exceptions Recently some editors have been trying to change the coat of arms in the picture to a pre-1952 version. 2401:E180:8883:EDC:1DFA:790E:E690:DCC2 (talk) 04:31, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I have prepared a new variant consisting of the 1952 arms with the Tudor crown. I would like to request permission to update the main file. I intend to reupload the existing file as "Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom (1952-2022).svg". Valethske (talk) 03:10, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Hey, somebody named Johnnorris10217 wrote on Talk:Charles III this information:
 * "King Charles' updated RCoA has also been confirmed through the coronation invitation released this week, which shows the Tudor crown, which is also adopted in his wife's impaled arms. Linked here: https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-65175984" RicLightning (talk) 22:52, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I think you need to stop calling them the 1837 and 1952 versions. That's already been shown to be wrong. Victoria didn't use a Tudor crown: see Talk:List of British monarchs. And the less ornate harp was in use in the late 1920s and the more ornate harp was still used by Elizabeth II: see Talk:Charles III. Celia Homeford (talk) 11:27, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I call the two coats of arms with the different harps the 1837 version and the 1952 version because that is what is written in the current article.
 * Even I have noticed that the description of the year of the two coats of arms in the article may not be correct, but I don't know what to call the two different coats of arms. 2401:E180:8862:D75A:F93B:2C1F:D811:C91A (talk) 16:58, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
 * The current old version of the coat of arms picture is called Coat of arms of the United Kingdom (1837-1952)”.
 * If you have a better name to distinguish between these two different coats of arms, I hope you can tell me. 2401:E180:8862:D75A:F93B:2C1F:D811:C91A (talk) 17:21, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Perhaps our present names for the two versions of the arms should be changed, as it does appear Victoria used an older heraldic version of St Edward's Crown. However, I have not found any evidence of Elizabeth II using the more ornate harp (save for on the royal standard), further it seems as though her father didn't even use the ornate harp, or at least rarely used it.
 * Nonetheless, that's not the point of this discussion. Either way, both of those prior arms are incorrect for one reason or another. Estar8806 (talk) 20:03, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes. The focus of the current discussion is the new version of the coat of arms in 2023. The name part will temporarily use the old one in the absence of a better name. Later, we can discuss how to adjust the name part. 2401:E180:8850:CA11:490:D128:5D22:C047 (talk) 05:21, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Any chance you've seen the updated RCoA that has been confirmed through the coronation invitation released this week? https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-65175984 RicLightning (talk) 22:59, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

You guys are never gonna believe this! I just found on commons.wikimedia.org the new RCoA for King Charles in svg and it's beautiful! It was uploaded by this user, Colohisto. RicLightning (talk) 02:31, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

 * I think we should update the file here with new pictures after the discussion (File:Royal Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom.svg)
 * It will be better, just like the file updated last year (File:Badge of the House of Windsor.svg) 2401:E180:8842:D08F:6006:C70A:766E:1C5E (talk) 06:53, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
 * In this way, only a few places need to be changed, and there is no need to replace the pictures used in all related articles.
 * After the old version of the picture is replaced, we can add a URL for the old version of the picture.
 * You can refer to the changes here (File:Badge of the House of Windsor.svg) 2401:E180:8842:D08F:6006:C70A:766E:1C5E (talk) 06:59, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Excellent news! Glad this is all sorted :) Valethske (talk) 07:56, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
 * How to say(? 2401:E180:8841:354E:E021:52FF:9829:1343 (talk) 08:18, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
 * The pictures used in related articles have been updated (? 2401:E180:8841:354E:E021:52FF:9829:1343 (talk) 08:19, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Not in all of them, there are some templates that still use the old one I am currently unable to edit.
 * These are some notable ones.
 * Template:WikiProject United Kingdom
 * Template:WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom
 * Template:Infobox court case
 * If these can be edited it would automatically change the vast majority of instances to the current version. Valethske (talk) 08:47, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Understand, but I still think it would be better to directly replace the file on the (File:Royal Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom.svg) page, so that there is no need to update so many pages, including wikipedia in other languages. 2401:E180:8843:AACA:915A:5438:7F95:E054 (talk) 09:07, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I found out there is another place discussing the same issue should we ask there too(？ 2401:E180:8843:AACA:915A:5438:7F95:E054 (talk) 09:10, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Talk:Charles III#The King's royal arms 2401:E180:8843:AACA:915A:5438:7F95:E054 (talk) 09:11, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Talk:Charles III 2401:E180:8843:AACA:915A:5438:7F95:E054 (talk) 09:12, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes, it seems logical to raise it there. Though I think it might be a better idea to eventually rename the old file "Royal Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom (1952-2022)" and the new one to simply "Royal Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom". It seems unlikely it will revert to the "Queen's Crown" version in any of our lifetimes (its probably going to be at least 60 years) so won't cause enormous issues in the long run. Valethske (talk) 09:14, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes, I think it is very difficult to directly modify the file on the (File:Royal Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom.svg) page because too many articles currently use this file. So I think you can refer to (File: Badge of the House of Windsor.svg) example to modify. 2401:E180:8845:5031:E5E6:751:C1CC:920B (talk) 09:46, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
 * In theory, it is so, but it cannot be ruled out that the possibility of changing the coat of arms again after William becomes king.
 * File:Coat of Arms of William, Duke of Cambridge.svg
 * File:Combined Coat of Arms of William and Catherine, the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge.svg 2401:E180:8845:5031:E5E6:751:C1CC:920B (talk) 09:55, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
 * The harp used in his old coat of arms is from the 1837-1952 version.
 * So the possibility cannot be ruled out. 2401:E180:8845:5031:E5E6:751:C1CC:920B (talk) 10:00, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I don't quite know why those arms use the more ornate harp. William would not use the ornate harp as they are not his arms, he would use whatever the reigning sovereign's arms are with some form of difference. The arms on his article presently use the more modern harp.
 * If he opts to use the more ornate harp on his accession, which almost certainly will not happen considering his more modern style, then it may be changed. For now, that's not a concern. Any discussions regarding changes in the name of the files should take place on Commons anyway, not here. Estar8806 (talk) 17:04, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I mean this possibility is not ruled out. If this situation really happens, we have to replace the file for each article (? I personally think that the update of the coat of arms only needs to be updated on one main page instead of all articles Replace the picture on the. 2401:E180:8883:D736:262F:4799:1A85:3A98 (talk) 18:07, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
 * At present, the pictures used in many articles have been replaced. If the subsequent coat of arms is updated, which main file should we update, or should we replace all the picture addresses on the revised articles? I think To update images you should only use one main file instead of splitting into two as currently. 2401:E180:8883:D736:262F:4799:1A85:3A98 (talk) 18:16, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I think we should update the current main document directly after the same discussion in two different places has a consensus.
 * No need to create a new main file 2401:E180:8883:D736:262F:4799:1A85:3A98 (talk) 18:19, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
 * And suspend the replacement of pictures in other articles and wait for the discussion to be completed before editing 2401:E180:8881:8094:A022:8244:C7FB:ADC4 (talk) 18:30, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I just want to wait until the discussions on both sides have a consensus before editing. If the discussion on one side still has no consensus, it will be difficult to deal with. 2401:E180:8881:8094:A022:8244:C7FB:ADC4 (talk) 18:43, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

There's also the question of the Scottish version. I haven't heard of or seen any official changes being made, but I assume that St Edward's Crown on the Scottish version will also be replaced with the Tudor.--Estar8806 (talk) 03:11, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

 * I agree. I haven't spotted the Scottish version with the Tudor crown yet. RicLightning (talk) 03:28, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I've been checking examples of the arms in Scotland on Commons, and it appears that almost all depictions of the Royal Arms in Scotland use the Tudor Crown exclusively.
 * Royal Arms tablet, Edinburgh Sheriff Court.JPG
 * The Tudor Crown can be distinguished from the Crown of Scotland even in highly stylized form because of the placing of the fleur-de-lis and cross pattee (cross pattee in the centre on the Tudor Crown, fleur-de-lis in the centre on the Crown of Scotland). Valethske (talk) 05:03, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
 * You can compare it with this picture, the crown seems to be in the wrong position.
 * File:Royal Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom (Scotland).svg 2401:E180:8892:66A9:67AF:F7F:439B:F206 (talk) 11:06, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Are there any other similar pictures 2401:E180:8892:66A9:67AF:F7F:439B:F206 (talk) 11:08, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
 * There are a few, most of them appear to use the Tudor Crown.
 * c:File:Edinburgh_-_Thistle_Chapel_in_St_Giles'_Chapel_10.JPG
 * This one uses the St. Edward's crown
 * Another Tudor crown one
 * Yet more Tudor crowns
 * One in a courtroom, again, Tudor crowns
 * It seems the Wiki versions of the arms are a bit WP:OR. There does not seem to be a precise fixed version, but the majority of 20th century examples appear to use the Tudor crown. Valethske (talk) 11:50, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
 * understand 2401:E180:8893:F3DE:5DD:AC7A:B8B6:2691 (talk) 14:04, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
 * How do you update a large number of articles (? Do you manually edit each article (? 2401:E180:8893:F3DE:5DD:AC7A:B8B6:2691 (talk) 14:09, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Again, these are all almost certainly stylizations of the Crown of Scotland. St Edward's Crown and the Tudor Crown have never been used exclusively on the Scottish arms, they've always been paired with the Crown of Scotland. On at least the first two you can tell it's the Crown of Scotland and not the Tudor Crown nor St Edward's Crown as the arches touch the velvet of the Crown, which stylisations of St Edward's or Tudor do not. Estar8806 (talk) 14:50, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Do you have any examples to prove your assertion? I would be genuinely interested to see. Not even the most extreme stylization would change the placing of the fleur-de-lis on the crown. Valethske (talk) 15:35, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
 * A quick search of Commons shows that the Tudor and St. Edward's crowns are commonly portrayed with the arches touching the velvet.
 * c:File:141122 Former British Consulate Shimonoseki Yamaguchi pref Japan00s.jpg
 * c:File:Coats of arms at the gate of Government House, Brisbane, Queensland, 2019.jpg
 * c:File:All Saints church - Victorian royal arms - geograph.org.uk - 1547467.jpg
 * c:File:All Hallows, Gospel Oak - Royal Arms - geograph.org.uk - 3364500.jpg
 * c:File:St Bride, Fleet Street, London EC4 - Royal Arms - geograph.org.uk - 1213758.jpg
 * c:File:Colourful Coat of Arms (27168605155).jpg
 * Valethske (talk) 15:45, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Look very closely, particularly at the corners for st Edward and you will see the arches are not actually touching the velvet. Except perhaps with the victorian era ones you've cited. I'm not wholly familiar with those arms. Estar8806 (talk) 16:21, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
 * But how and when will the Scottish coat of arms get updated to the 21st century version with the Tudor crown? When? RicLightning (talk) 00:30, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm almost certain that's still supposed to be the Crown of Scotland. Even if it is portrayed wrong, I have never seen a Scottish variant of the arms use the crown used by the rest of the UK exclusively (as in, having St Edward's Crown placed on the heads of both the supporters and atop the shield). I've sen it done like that before, I can't recall where though. Estar8806 (talk) 14:46, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry but that sounds a bit of a stretch, do you have any photographic examples of your own? Valethske (talk) 15:36, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Do a google search, see if you can find a single version where the same crown is used in all three places that is not the crown of scotland, it does not exist. In scotland, the Crown of Scotland is used, except on the Lion where the respective crown of england is used, though not exclusively. Estar8806 (talk) 16:17, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I've provided examples, why don't you? Valethske (talk) 16:35, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
 * c:File:Royal Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom (Scotland).svg
 * c:File:FingaskRoyalCoatofArms.jpg
 * c:https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Greater_royal_coats_of_arms_of_the_United_Kingdom_(Scotland)
 * You can also look at our standard stylizations for St Edward's Crown, the Tudor Crown and the Crown of Scotland, the former two do not touch the velvet and the latter does. Estar8806 (talk) 22:57, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I am not even sure what you are trying to say. One of those examples is exactly the thing I was complaining about: a Wiki original piece that may be OR. Valethske (talk) 00:22, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm not certain why you would think they're OR, they've been uncontested for well over a decade. My point is, the Tudor Crown wasn't used in Scotland during the reign of Elizabeth II. You can clearly tell because the Crown used in the arms of the greater United Kingdom is never used on all three places in the Scottish version of the arms. Estar8806 (talk) 00:27, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I decided to compare them to actual renditions of the arms that can be seen in real life. I gave multiple examples where the same crown was used, Valethske (talk) 00:31, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I should've been more clear. There are versions where the Crown of Scotland is used exclusively in all three spots, such as the logo for the Office of the Secretary of State for Scotland c:File:Office of the Secretary of State for Scotland logo.png, but the Tudor Crown and St Edward's Crown are only ever used on the head of the lion in the Scottish version of the arms. Estar8806 (talk) 00:37, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
 * this(?
 * File:Royal Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom (Government in Scotland).svg 2401:E180:8803:3DA4:B6FE:2858:5F36:67D3 (talk) 01:38, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
 * That works, yes. Estar8806 (talk) 02:20, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Do you have a way to update the file for File:Royal Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom.svg) (? I see that you have done similar updates 2401:E180:8801:AA0C:B976:7738:2478:535E (talk) 02:23, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I have requested the existing files be appended with "(1952-2022)". Valethske (talk) 14:37, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Understand, I just want to say that Wikipedia in other languages can also be updated at the same time. It will be a big project to import this picture into Wikipedia in other languages (many articles will have to be re-edited). 2401:E180:8803:2034:9397:5336:9F84:9F47 (talk) 14:54, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia's in other languages may pay less attention to this crown change. 2401:E180:8803:2034:9397:5336:9F84:9F47 (talk) 14:56, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I lodged the request with Commons, so it will change universally across the site. The "(2022)" annexure on the modern arms can then be dropped. Valethske (talk) 14:57, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
 * So what should we do now that we have added (2022)? He will also change (? 2401:E180:8803:2034:9397:5336:9F84:9F47 (talk) 16:00, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Royal coat of arms of the United Kingdom (1837-1901) Some thoughts on crown variants
The "1837-1952" version of the arms seems to actually be just the 1901-1952 version and wasn't used during Victoria's reign. Victoria's version of the arms used a different crown. I might have to produce a new version for 1837-1901.

Valethske (talk) 00:14, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

 * But is there a way to verify which crown was used in 1837-1901? 2401:E180:8803:3DA4:B6FE:2858:5F36:67D3 (talk) 01:40, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
 * It was definitely the St. Edward's crown, but the depiction was in a very different style to the 1952 version, so different that I think it would be dishonest to consider them exactly the same. These are heraldic devices afterall, the Tudor Crown for example is not based on any specific extant crown. Valethske (talk) 04:29, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Understand, because I only noticed (1837-1901) that the crown he used was not the Tudor crown when I was watching it, but I didn't further study which crown he used.
 * So you already have evidence to determine that 1837-1901 is St. Edward's crown (regardless of the design at that time and the current one) 2401:E180:8801:8618:7E00:E1C6:E415:1DDC (talk) 06:53, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
 * You can see the coat of arms in this file.
 * [[File:Victoria-coa-proclamation-1837.svg]]2401:E180:8802:1536:CDEC:D978:29E2:B1CA (talk) 17:14, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I watched it before
 * Category:Royal Cypher of Victoria of the United Kingdom 2401:E180:8802:1536:CDEC:D978:29E2:B1CA (talk) 17:25, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
 * [[File:St Margaret's church - Victorian royal arms - geograph.org.uk - 1602596.jpg]]2401:E180:8802:1536:CDEC:D978:29E2:B1CA (talk) 17:27, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
 * In the picture I saw there is St. Edward's crown and also Use Tudor Crown. 2401:E180:8D00:D95F:5FA7:6E58:B433:6201 (talk) 14:45, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
 * The orb on the crown in this picture is the wrong color. 2401:E180:8D03:922C:C12:D75C:C52:C899 (talk) 09:53, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
 * This is the picture I found for your reference 2401:E180:8802:1536:CDEC:D978:29E2:B1CA (talk) 17:52, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
 * This image from the Royal Museums Greenwich suggests otherwise. It shows the combined coat of arms of Queen Victoria and Prince Albert, with the Queen's arms surmounted by the Tudor Crown. GandalfXLD (talk) 19:05, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Some editors mentioned that a legal document in the 1840s used St. Edward's crown, but the examples I saw found that some used St. Edward's crown and some used Tudor Crown, which may be the same as 1952-2022 (even if most of the (St. Edward's crown is used, but Tudor Crown is also used in some places). 2401:E180:8840:CA48:3DF9:FE04:FD37:5DDB (talk) 02:00, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
 * There is a photo showing the coat of arms from 1840.
 * look over here 2401:E180:8840:CA48:3DF9:FE04:FD37:5DDB (talk) 02:06, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I saw in the pictures on the Internet that both crowns were used in 1837-1901, but there are more examples of using St. Edward's crown. 2401:E180:8841:D94:E95E:69F1:C3C1:BD1C (talk) 03:44, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
 * You can find the picture of Coat of Arms of Her Majesty Queen Victoria through Google. 2401:E180:8843:FB98:4570:A194:91D8:78D6 (talk) 03:50, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Queen Victoria's Coat of Arms from the College of Arms shown with the Tudor Crown. GandalfXLD (talk) 14:58, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
 * There seem to be actual cases where both Crowns are used. Things are a bit complicated at the moment, if we only use one of the Crown's coats of arms marked 1837-1901, it is not very accurate. 2401:E180:8883:6CEA:A89B:D23E:F2FB:4B45 (talk) 17:05, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I think if the Collage of Arms have depicted the coat of arms of Queen Victoria with the Tudor Crown, that is the crown we should go with. GandalfXLD (talk) 20:31, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
 * It’s just that there are many examples of these two crowns. If we only say that 1837-1901 only used Tudor Crown, how should we introduce the cases of using St. Edward’s crown. There are also many cases of using St. Edward’s crown in 1837-1901. 2401:E180:88A1:A80:5E7F:96B8:80D3:18D5 (talk) 04:16, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
 * To ignore the Royal coat of arms of the United Kingdom version using St Edward's Crown but without the arms of Hanover (? 2401:E180:88A1:A80:5E7F:96B8:80D3:18D5 (talk) 04:24, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I think both versions should be regarded as the coat of arms of 1837-1901, so that it will be more accurate. 2401:E180:88A1:A80:5E7F:96B8:80D3:18D5 (talk) 04:29, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I disagree. The College of Arms of all people would know which crown to use. I believe the College should be respected and that the Tudor Crown was the official crown during Queen Victoria's reign. GandalfXLD (talk) 18:23, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Before there is more reliable evidence to prove that St. Edward's Crown was also officially used in 1837-1901, the original Tudor Crown (1837-1952) will be temporarily maintained. 2401:E180:88A0:6195:66A8:DF84:4333:C8C5 (talk) 02:21, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
 * But that's not a Tudor crown. The arches are different. Celia Homeford (talk) 07:33, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
 * That is the Tudor Crown. You can tell from the overall shape of the crown. GandalfXLD (talk) 09:53, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
 * No, I can't tell actually. Celia Homeford (talk) 10:58, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I agree, this is not a clear depiction of the Tudor Crown which typically has high curved arches, the flattening of the arches much more close;y resembles other depictions of the St Edward's Crown contemporaneous to the period. Ebonelm (talk) 16:07, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Although the coat of arms in the picture of the College of Arms uses the Tudor Crown, we cannot ignore the use of St. Edward's crown between 1837-1901.
 * And it can be noticed that there are not a few instances of using St. Edward's crown. 61.216.108.175 (talk) 01:38, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
 * It seems that we really cannot say that Queen Victoria did not use Tudor Crown or St. Edward's crown. In the coat of arms of 1837-1901, these two different Crowns were used at the same time. 2401:E180:8883:6CEA:A89B:D23E:F2FB:4B45 (talk) 17:15, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
 * The pictures found so far show that, between 1837 and 1901, these two Crowns were used respectively. 2401:E180:8883:6CEA:A89B:D23E:F2FB:4B45 (talk) 17:19, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
 * The Crown depicted in the Version of the St. Edward's crown used in the 19th century was not completely used, and there are examples in the current picture that do not use this depiction. 2401:E180:8883:6CEA:A89B:D23E:F2FB:4B45 (talk) 17:26, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

There is plenty of evidence to show that St Edward's Crown was used by Queen Victoria see for example the coat of arms used on original copies of legislation passed in 1837, 1882, and 1900. The Tudor Crown was not included on legislation until the reign of King Edward VII, see for example original copies of legislation from 1903. Monarchs from Charles II up to and including Queen Victoria essentially used the St Edward's Crown exclusively. It is also worth remembering that heraldry is an art form and therefore many representations will have not made a conscious effort to depict any particular crown. I am yet to see any compelling evidence that Queen Victoria ever used the Tudor Crown in an official capacity. Ebonelm (talk) 16:07, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

 * In fact, the evidence mentioned by Gandalf XLD is based on the pictures in the article published by the Academy of Heraldry, as the basis for Queen Victoria using the Tudor crown. I checked some pictures and found that both crowns have been used (I saw example there is another version that is more descriptively a Tudor crown), but I still see St Edward's crown being used more. 112.104.137.38 (talk) 16:40, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
 * As far as I am aware, GandalfXLD has only shared two images, neither of which show a Tudor Crown. One from the College of Arms (which I presume is what you mean by the "Academy of Heraldry"), which clearly shows a St Edward's Crown, and the other (the joint Queen Victoria/Prince Albert image) in which the crown does not particularly resemble either the Tudor Crown or St Edward's Crown, but which because of the the complete lack of arching still resembles the St Edward's Crown more than the Tudor Crown. Ebonelm (talk) 21:39, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes,i typed the name wrong 2401:E180:8813:37B1:AB6D:271:37A2:742 (talk) 23:52, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
 * File:UK Royal Coat of Arms.svg 2401:E180:8D51:6254:C524:9DF6:6E69:4A07 (talk) 12:34, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
 * File:Scottish royal coat of arms.svg 2401:E180:8D51:7255:457F:5E1D:9DA8:591C (talk) 17:15, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Tudor Crown (heraldry)
 * But we need to verify whether the heraldic content mentioned in this article for the years 1837-1901 is true. 2401:E180:8871:ABAA:2AA9:3A42:3B1E:1E92 (talk) 08:56, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
 * If what is said in this article is true, it means that the crowns used from 1837 to 1901 were not only the Tudor Crown. 2401:E180:8871:ABAA:2AA9:3A42:3B1E:1E92 (talk) 08:58, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

Incorrect coats of arms
Hello all

I have recently noticed that on some pages, the wrong coat of arms are used for the time period. This can be seen with the Criminal Evidence (Witness Anonymity) Act, the Offences Against the Person act, as well as several more, which use the 2022 coat of arms rather than the appropriate versions for the periods the legislation was passed. Does anybody know how to correct this? I'm still fairly new to Wikipedia and couldn't figure out how to do it Ted Jillani (talk) 22:55, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

 * What are you talking about? Which coat of arms is wrong? RicLightning (talk) 00:08, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
 * In the articles for some pieces of legislation, such as the one for the Offences Against the Person act 1861, the coat of arms used is the 2022 version, featuring the 'Tudor' crown and simplified harp. This isn't the correct version for the period when the law was passed. The correct version in this case would be the 1837- 1952 version featuring the winged harp. This isn't the only case, some laws passed between 1952 and 2022 feature the version of the arms with the 'Tudor' crown when St Edward's would be more appropriate. Apologies if I wasn't clear, I don't mean that any of the coats of arms on this page are incorrect. I was hoping that somebody may see my comment here and then correct the coats of arms on the articles where it is incorrect. I would have done it myself however I couldn't figure out how to change the arms. Also, I thought it would be easier to ask here rather than asking separately on the talk pages on each individual page, as there appears to be several that ought to be altered Ted Jillani (talk) 00:32, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I've finally figured out how to change the coats of arms for individual pieces of legislation. Apologies for any confusion caused Ted Jillani (talk) 00:42, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
 * This should change many articles (? 2401:E180:8D64:337A:7FE5:4193:4CC2:BB11 (talk) 03:48, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
 * It won't change several at once if that's what you mean. I can only assume that the infobox on the template for legislation automatically used the present coat of arms unless otherwise altered? Ted Jillani (talk) 10:12, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Scottish version of the Arms
I'm concerned about our present version of the Royal arms of Scotland. Not simply because it includes St Edward's Crown rather than the Tudor Crown, but because I fear it may be incorrect in its usage of either crown. For example, on the royal website the Scottish version of the arms (during the reign of Elizabeth II) is shown. There, it looks to be the same crown on the shield and both supporters. Other files in commons also show the same crown used throughout. Based on this, it seems to me that the heraldic Crown of Scotland is used throughout the Royal arms in Scotland (on the head of the unicorn, the lion and the helmet above the shield). I'm sure there's someone who knows more about Scottish heraldry. Cheers, Estar8806 (talk) 20:30, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

 * The safest way is to have two different coats of arms ready 2401:E180:8841:B21C:377C:52E0:F465:5C1A (talk) 18:11, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
 * They've finally made a version of the Scottish CoA with the Tudor Crown! Take a look! File:Royal Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom (Scotland, 2022).svg RicLightning (talk) 21:46, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
 * It's exactly the same as the previous version. I have nominated it for deletion. The Crown of Scotland is used in the Scottish arms, not St Edward's or Tudor. Celia Homeford (talk) 08:11, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
 * So we need to prepare the coat of arms with the version of the Scottish crown and modify the relevant introduction (? 2401:E180:8860:C2D0:A60F:AD0D:534D:4DD6 (talk) 16:57, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
 * The current Scottish coat of arms on wikipedia is using St Edward's Crown. 2401:E180:8864:695:ED4A:5037:5FB9:1CC7 (talk) 01:59, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I've just checked a few examples (File:FingaskRoyalCoatofArms.jpg, File:Coat of Arms (6167002280).jpg, File:Coat of Arms at entrance to NLS June 2013.jpg. File:Edinburgh - Thistle Chapel in St Giles' Chapel 10.JPG, File:Royal Arms tablet, Edinburgh Sheriff Court.JPG. I fail to see any difference between the crowns. I think we are obsessing over nothing. Any crown can be used, on either side. Celia Homeford (talk) 06:53, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I can't see the difference either. Maybe the Crown that appears in the three places in the coat of arms is the same crown (? 2401:E180:8863:482D:C388:B92B:67F9:2B98 (talk) 07:55, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
 * in my opinion
 * The Scottish version of the Arms should also be updated, I think it should follow these examples and replace the crown in the coat of arms with the same crown. 2401:E180:8864:BDD3:E333:729E:1C96:4309 (talk) 16:59, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
 * in my opinion
 * The Scottish version of the Arms should also be updated. I think that the coat of arms should be adjusted according to these examples. In fact, I have not seen any examples of actual use of the currently used pictures. 2401:E180:8864:BDD3:E333:729E:1C96:4309 (talk) 17:04, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Yeah. But which crown on the statant guardant lion will it be? The Crown of Scotland, or the Tudor Crown? Which is it? RicLightning (talk) 18:16, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
 * That's precisely the point. There doesn't appear to be a difference between the Crowns, the crown on the lion appears to be the same as the crown on the Unicorn and the shield (see the examples cited by Celia Homeford). Looking at the 'official' versions on royal.uk, the crown seems to more closely represent the Crown of Scotland than the Tudor Crown or St Edward's Crown. This would make sense, to have the Crown of Scotland on the Scottish version of the royal arms. Estar8806 (talk) 01:15, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I want to ask if there is a clearer example(? 2401:E180:8883:4638:23A7:7D07:2B50:445B (talk) 01:37, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I agree that the version from the Blue Book is very unclear. A good example would be the Logo of the Lord President of the Court of Session which clearly uses the Crown of Scotland for both all three crowns depicted. Ebonelm (talk) 16:46, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Royal Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom (Government in Scotland).svg 61.216.108.176 (talk) 03:43, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Those two coats of arms aren't the same kind (? 2401:E180:8852:A403:AE3C:D883:2AC2:3414 (talk) 09:19, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
 * They are both the Royal Arms as used in Scotland, its just the version used by the Government of Scotland does not utilise the full armorial. As there are few high quality official images of the version used in Scotland then I would argue that relying on official versions which clearly depict the item being discussed irrespective of whether they are the full armorial should be relied upon. However if you are not convinced by that argument then a version of the full armorial in higher quality than used in the Blue Book (although still lower quality than than used by the Lord President of the Court of Session) can be found on any Act of the Scottish Parliament. See for example the introduction to the Coronavirus (Recovery and Reform) (Scotland) Act 2022 which shows only the Crown of Scotland being used. Ebonelm (talk) 10:28, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Can you put the Scottish coat of arms with the Tudor crown and the simpler harp first (? Recently, some editors have changed the coat of arms to a version before 1952 because of the crown problem.
 * This temporary version will be replaced with the new heraldry after the discussion is complete.
 * The coat of arms has been changed under the circumstances that the discussion has not yet come to fruition 2401:E180:8850:F7FE:FC20:6D0A:C807:A815 (talk) 16:18, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Or get ready for a coat of arms with only the Scottish crown Most of the examples seen so far look to use only the Scottish crown. 2401:E180:8850:8FFB:A9EC:ED0B:A3F8:EB9B (talk) 02:27, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I accidentally saw the video of Scotland announcing the succession of Charles III yesterday. The coat of arms is also used in the video. I think I can take a screenshot of the coat of arms in the video as a reference (note: the harp he uses is not the simpler harp in the current coat of arms. ) 2401:E180:8850:8FFB:A9EC:ED0B:A3F8:EB9B (talk) 02:36, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Additionally, for clarity, unlike the version of the Royal Arms used outside of Scotland where there will need to be 1952/53-2022 version and a post-2022 version, in the case of the Royal Arms as used in Scotland no new version as need to be made as there will be no difference between the the depiction of the arms in the reigns of the Elizabeth II and Charles III, rather the existing image will need to be corrected. Ebonelm (talk) 10:34, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
 * The coat of arms outside of Scotland I think the naming method is distinguished by the crown they use, like "File:Royal Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom (Tudor crown).svg" and "File:Royal Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom (St. Edward's Crown).svg”
 * I still see that some places still use St. Edward's Crown, so I don't think it should be named after the year. 2401:E180:8853:AB5:1A46:DB02:A371:AB41 (talk) 12:49, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
 * The version with St. Edward's crown should still be used for a while. At present, some places have not been updated and may not be replaced until later. 2401:E180:8853:AB5:1A46:DB02:A371:AB41 (talk) 12:56, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
 * The version used in Scotland I think the current version should be corrected. 2401:E180:8853:AB5:1A46:DB02:A371:AB41 (talk) 12:51, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
 * A previous editor mentioned that the coat of arms with the Tudor crown and the simpler harp may have appeared in the 1940s so I don't think it is accurate to name it the 2022 version. The coat of arms with the St. Edward's crown is as of now (2023) is still appearing in some places, so it cannot be said that it will only be used until 2022. 2401:E180:8853:AB5:1A46:DB02:A371:AB41 (talk) 13:49, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
 * 1.File:Dominion_of_New_Zealand_passport.jpg
 * 2.File:Passport UKGBI.jpg
 * 3.File:National Registration Identity Card (Front Cover).png 2401:E180:8853:AB5:1A46:DB02:A371:AB41 (talk) 13:56, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
 * 4.File:1945 UK Passport.jpg 2401:E180:8852:972B:CA30:3D78:655B:2B4F (talk) 07:48, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
 * 5.File:George VI Manchester City Hall 20051020.jpg 2401:E180:8850:8722:AF56:7EEC:6F88:FF9E (talk) 17:38, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Obviously we have to discuss again. 2401:E180:8843:1920:4A6E:544B:1DD9:72DB (talk) 16:07, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
 * How do you think preparing two different coats of arms. 2401:E180:8883:5EC:3183:EF81:7310:69CE (talk) 05:38, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
 * That is simply not correct. Referring to the Heraldry Society of Scotland, it is abundantly clear that the crown atop the lion is St Edward’s Crown (for the Late Queen). Similarly here, the rendition used in the Court of Session also shows St Edward’s Crown.
 * In any case, until a change from the established norm from previous monarch’s has been demonstrated, the Tudor crown above the lion should be the version used as it is in-keeping with that norm. ZElsb (talk) 15:21, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
 * This is the source referenced in the previousdiscussion.https://www.nrscotland.gov.uk/research/learning/features/queen-elizabeth-ii-and-scotland 2401:E180:8843:1920:4A6E:544B:1DD9:72DB (talk) 16:05, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I wanted to ask if you know anything about the coat of arms from 1837-1901. There is a discussion above that states that Queen Victoria used St. Edward's Crown instead of Tudor Crown. 2401:E180:8853:7F77:7A18:380C:F648:22DF (talk) 14:18, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
 * So here's my thoughts after some time of discussion (pinging the registered editors involved, hopefully the IPs will find their ways back here: @Celia Homeford, @Ebonelm, @RicLightning).
 * The blazon cited by Sodacan when creating the present Scottish coat of arms is as follows:
 * Quarterly, First and Fourth Or a lion rampant within a double tressure flory counter-flory Gules (for Scotland), Second quarter Gules three lions passant guardant in pale Or armed and langued Azure (for England), Third quarter Azure a harp Or stringed Argent (for Ireland), the whole surrounded by the Order of the Thistle; for a Crest, upon the Royal helm the imperial crown Proper, a lion sejant affrontée Gules, imperially crowned Or, holding in the dexter paw a sword and in the sinister paw a scepter both erect and Proper, motto ‘In defens’; Mantling Or and ermine; for Supporters, dexter a unicorn Argent armed, crined and unguled Proper, gorged with a coronet Or composed of crosses patée and fleurs de lys a chain affixed thereto passing between the forelegs and reflexed over the back also Or, supporting a tilting lance proper flying a banner Azure, a saltire Argent (Cross of Saint Andrew); sinister a lion rampant guardant Or imperially crowned Proper, supporting a tilting lance proper flying a banner Argent, a cross Gules (Cross of Saint George); Motto 'Nemo me impune lacessit' in the compartment below the shield, with the thistle.
 * From this blazon I take away a few things:
 * A) The blazon mentions nothing of a crown on the head of the unicorn.
 * B) The blain refers to the "imperial crown" throughout.
 * Generally I've only head "imperial crown" to refer to the Tudor Crown. But, as the source was written under Elizabeth II I would consider that would be St Edward's Crown at the time. But of course, the Office of the Secretary of State for Scotland and the logo of the Court of Session use the Crown of Scotland.
 * In short, I think it's best if we do both: have one version with the Crown of Scotland (for use on the United Kingdom page, and one with the Crown of Scotland and/or the Tudor Crown, for use on this page with some form of explanation somewhere to say that both versions may be used. Thoughts? Estar8806 (talk) 04:43, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Only replace the St. Edward Crown in the current coat of arms with Tudor Crown. This version already exists.(But it has been deleted by others) 2401:E180:8883:5EC:3183:EF81:7310:69CE (talk) 05:24, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Or are you talking about making coats of arms that only use the Tudor Crown/Crown of Scotland? 2401:E180:8883:5EC:3183:EF81:7310:69CE (talk) 05:29, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Make versions that use two different Crowns 2401:E180:8883:5EC:3183:EF81:7310:69CE (talk) 05:31, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I am in favor of being able to prepare two different coats of arms, but the question is whether anyone else besides Sodacan can help make them 2401:E180:8883:5EC:3183:EF81:7310:69CE (talk) 05:35, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I am convinced that the Scottish version of the Royal Arms should never use different depictions of the crown in a singular image. The current version of the Royal Arms as used in Scotland is incorrect as it contains three uses of the Crown of Scotland and one of St Edwards Crown in a singular image. Unfortunately the reference used by @Sodacan in creating the current Scottish version is not available online, however it is my understanding that no formal issuing of the Royal Arms as used in Scotland has ever occurred and therefore I am not sure that the text in the reference can be considered anything more than a heraldic description by the author of the text (or by Sodacan describing an image in the book) of what they think the arms should be, rather than a reproduction of the text issuing the armorial. The third image in this link shows an official rendering of the Royal Arms as used in Scotland as drawn by a "Heraldic Writer to the Lyon Court", this image therefore has presumably been drawn in full knowledge of how the arms should be presented and it is clear from this image that all four crowns are drawn the same way. Heraldically speaking, unless otherwise noted any heraldic depiction of a crown is valid (this is what allows the depiction of the crown in the Royal Arms as used outside Scotland to be changed from the St Edwards Crown to the Tudor Crown without a new issuing of arms to occur, and is also one of the reasons why there is so much inconsistency in visual depictions of the crown in physical depictions of the Royal Arms), however the pearls on the cross clearly identify the crown depicted as the Crown of Scotland. Furthermore the Crown of Scotland is clearly used for both supporters in other versions of the Royal Arms as used in Scotland by the UK and Scottish governments. In summary: I would strongly oppose creating any further versions of the Royal Arms as used in Scotland which depicted multiple crowns in a singular image and would strongly support changing the current depiction to have all four crowns be the Crown of Scotland. Ebonelm (talk) 17:55, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Now that we have valid sources to refer to, it should be possible to confirm how the Scottish arms should be updated, but we need to find someone to make the new arms.
 * Royal Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom for
 * use in Scotland 2401:E180:8880:EE3F:19D8:8134:38D9:F149 (talk) 02:30, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Also I'm wondering if we're going to update the pre-1952 version as well (replacing the crown). 2401:E180:8881:6691:E999:9A5F:D71F:461E (talk) 02:36, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
 * At the same time, the relevant description of the Scottish coat of arms will also be updated. 2401:E180:8884:CD1:18D1:7B04:9572:FD1E (talk) 07:51, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I think we should just update the existing heraldry page. Re-opening a new page to upload files is really not effective. Up to now, other languages have not yet completed the update of the heraldry file. 2401:E180:8881:BC5B:84BA:4D9:121D:3D41 (talk) 13:21, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
 * File:Royal Warrant - Jenners in Edinburgh - 2004-10-22.jpg 2401:E180:8883:7D01:8905:4EAE:7D76:D08E (talk) 15:47, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
 * If possible, I hope to complete the update before May 6th.
 * (I don't want to add a new coat of arms on a new page, I want to update the coat of arms on the existing page so that other language wikis can also complete the correction of the Scottish coat of arms at the same time.) 2401:E180:8831:9B1A:1B89:F427:CEC1:7D96 (talk) 15:44, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I think the previous updates where we had a new page for the new version of the coat of arms didn't work very well (in other languages wikipedia) (I mean the update speed of wiki articles in other languages is a bit slow, and some pages still use the old coat of arms). 2401:E180:8831:9B1A:1B89:F427:CEC1:7D96 (talk) 15:58, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
 * @Ebonelm Thank you for providing that source. It appears as though is used the Crown of Scotland throughout, based on your mention of the pearls on the cross.
 * I'm hoping that either of our lovely contributors who've made arms in the past could develop this new version. I know @Sodacan was responsible for the original, though perhaps @Colohisto would be able to edit the Scottish version just as they did for the modern English version. Estar8806 (talk) 20:43, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Then, please ask the person who helped to make the new version of the coat of arms to help update the existing file, instead of opening a new page to upload a new file (like the current update method of the new version of the British coat of arms in 2022). Is there a way (?. 2401:E180:8831:9594:46E7:954D:F1A9:655 (talk) 01:49, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I agree; according to practice, it should be the Crown of Scotland on both supporters. Celia Homeford (talk) 11:51, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Glad we have an agreement Our main problem now is finding someone to make the new coat of arms and how to replace the old coat of arms.
 * Do you have any suggestions on how to update the coat of arms in the part of the current article that uses the Scottish coat of arms. 2401:E180:8832:E871:B0A6:D8A0:89DD:AA99 (talk) 13:06, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I think we were updating the Royal coat of arms of the United Kingdom before
 * The method is not very good, because the wikipedia articles in many other languages have not yet completed the update of the coat of arms. 2401:E180:8832:E871:B0A6:D8A0:89DD:AA99 (talk) 13:09, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
 * We need to update these two files.
 * 1.File:Royal Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom (Scotland).svg
 * 2.File:Royal Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom (both variants).svg 2401:E180:8893:8E49:50B7:2B47:7EA2:794 (talk) 02:14, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
 * For all those involved, I have put in a request at WP:GL/I for a version of the Royal arms with the Crown of Scotland in all four spots. Hopefully someone will pick it up. Estar8806 (talk) 22:28, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Do you know about the coat of arms from 1837 to 1901? I think someone raised a problem with the use time of the coat of arms. We can also discuss by the way to see if there is really a problem. If there is a problem, we can correct the coat of arms together. 2401:E180:8820:4664:AFB2:856A:A7FD:EDC3 (talk) 17:42, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I just noticed that the file has been updated, and I would like to ask others to confirm whether the new coat of arms is correct. If anyone has research on the coat of arms from 1837-1901, I hope you can participate in the discussion above (Some thoughts on crown variants). 2401:E180:8882:C9CC:6325:A894:D003:5195 (talk) 04:16, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Do the crowns in this file also need to be changed to Scottish crowns (?
 * File:Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom in Scotland (Variant 1).svg 112.104.154.95 (talk) 16:40, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
 * If I can add another source, in Simple Heraldry, Cheerfully Illustrated (which has been posted here, p.39), all four crowns in the Scottish version of the royal arms are the same. Those crowns are in turn identical to the depiction of the crowns in the 'outside Scotland' version of the arms on the same page.
 * Simple Heraldry was compiled by Sir Iain Moncreiffe, Albany Herald at the Lyon Court, and Don Pottiger, herald painter for Lord Lyon and later Islay Herald, so although it's aimed at a general audience and a bit outdated it is a reliable Scottish source. A.D.Hope (talk) 19:30, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I noticed that an editor switched back to using the Tudor Crown/St. Edward's Crown version of the Scottish coat of arms. Should we roll back this side edit.  Exception, we need someone to help update the crown used in the coat of arms here (File:Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom in Scotland (Variant 1).svg) 2401:E180:8843:709D:5368:181C:5EDC:2C4A (talk) 12:39, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

Sources for the royal arms
I've just completed a rearrange of the article, as the lead was very long and seems to have inadvertently absorbed the description, which in other articles is generally in a distinct section (e.g. the Netherlands).

What this exposed, however, is that the article is not very well-sourced when it comes to arms themselves, either the blazon or general description. I suspect this is because leads are not often fully-sourced. I've added a few basic sources, but they don't cover the full description and therefore leave some key points (e.g. whether the Scottish crown really is the Crown of Scotland) unsupported.

In short, if anyone has access to good sources feel free to add them. A.D.Hope (talk) 19:14, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

Requested move 14 May 2023

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) >>> Extorc . talk  10:06, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

 * current1=Royal coat of arms of the United Kingdom|new1=Coat of arms of the United Kingdom|current2=Royal coat of arms of Great Britain|new2=Coat of arms of Great Britain|current3=Royal arms of England|new3=Coat of arms of England|current4=Royal arms of Scotland|new4=Coat of arms of Scotland|current5=Royal arms of Cambodia|new5=Coat of arms of Cambodia|current6=Arms of Canada|new6=Coat of arms of Canada|}}

– These article titles are not consistent with similar articles on Wikipedia, which use the format 'Coat of arms of [x]'. I won't list every example, but among European monarchies you have Coat of arms of Spain and Coat of arms of Denmark, among South Asian monarchies there's Coat of arms of Malaysia, and among other Commonwealth realms Coat of arms of Antigua and Barbuda and Coat of Arms of New Zealand.
 * Royal coat of arms of the United Kingdom → Coat of arms of the United Kingdom
 * Royal coat of arms of Great Britain → Coat of arms of Great Britain
 * Royal arms of England → Coat of arms of England
 * Royal arms of Scotland → Coat of arms of Scotland
 * Royal arms of Cambodia → Coat of arms of Cambodia
 * Arms of Canada → Coat of arms of Canada

On a practical level there's no need to include 'royal' when a country has no other coat of arms, and there's equally no need to exclude 'coat of' when all other articles use it. As I don't believe there's any particular reason why the listed articles can't have their titles changed, we should standardise them. A.D.Hope (talk) 16:54, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Support. This improves the concision and consistency of the titles, without compromising the other three principles of WP:CRITERIA. In the case of Coat of arms of Canada, the move will improve precision. Indefatigable (talk) 19:41, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Support. Makes sense, and I can't think of any reason why the arms need to be designated as "royal" in the title, whether or not they actually are.  P Aculeius (talk) 10:50, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Support. It does make sense to match them up with all the rest. RicLightning (talk) 02:29, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Oppose per WP:COMMONNAME, which is not trumped by WP:CONSISTENT. These are almost always referred to as the Royal Arms. The first two should, however, be renamed to Royal arms of the United Kingdom and Royal arms of Great Britain respectively. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:40, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Support per nom. estar8806 (talk) ★ 13:42, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Support With some hesitation, I would support. The various terminology can be expanded upon on the respective articles. I might even suggest going a step further and say that all articles should be named "Emblem of...", as all coats of arms, seals, and such fall under the umbrella of being an emblem, but that is probably too radical and somewhat impractical.  Fry1989 eh? 14:19, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Neutral - Either version will do, IMHO :) GoodDay (talk) 21:52, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Update the Royal Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom (both variants)
I think we should get the "both variants" version updated as well. You know, change the St. Edward's Crown to the Tudor Crown on the England side, and to the Crown of Scotland on the Scotland side. I mean, it's been done on the other royal coat of arms versions. So, why not this version? RicLightning (talk) 21:33, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

 * I support your proposal, but can someone help upload an updated version of this file(? 2401:E180:8880:E368:21A9:D330:5E69:2D81 (talk) 01:45, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
 * But the introduction on the page has not been updated. 2401:E180:8880:319D:9379:7C8C:DEB8:1B49 (talk) 10:00, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
 * The picture has been updated by someone. 2401:E180:8880:319D:9379:7C8C:DEB8:1B49 (talk) 09:59, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I wonder if the coat of arms in this article Monarchy of the United Kingdom should be changed back to the version of both variants after the coat of arms has been updated. 2401:E180:8880:319D:9379:7C8C:DEB8:1B49 (talk) 10:16, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I suggest changing the picture back to this one.
 * File:Royal Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom (both variants).svg 2401:E180:8881:F5DF:B05E:3FC9:93D0:F98 (talk) 15:53, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I think this Scottish coat of arms should preferably be updated to be consistent with other Scottish coats of arms, at least he should not be using St. Edward's Crown currently.
 * File:Coat_of_Arms_of_the_United_Kingdom_in_Scotland_(Variant_1).svg 2401:E180:8892:4A51:7EDD:DEEC:30C0:8105 (talk) 14:57, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

These other coats of arms
Will thess coats of arms get updated as well? I mean, all the others are, why not these? RicLightning (talk) 02:33, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

 * Arms of Canada
 * There is no evidence yet that the crown will be replaced (?, and not necessarily with the final
 * Tudor Crown, Canadian Royal Crown may also be used, but this is only speculation at present, and there is no reliable evidence.
 * File:Coat of arms of Canada (Canadian Royal Crown).svg 2401:E180:8892:2A09:C45D:3C1E:29E2:6085 (talk) 13:49, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
 * So far only the British royal coat of arms has been updated, but there are many other parts of the UK that used EIIR, and there is no reliable source to indicate that they have the new CIIIR coat of arms. 2401:E180:8892:2A09:C45D:3C1E:29E2:6085 (talk) 13:57, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
 * As for the part of the Scottish coat of arms, I have no reliable source to confirm his crown, maybe it should be updated to the Scottish crown (? 2401:E180:8892:2A09:C45D:3C1E:29E2:6085 (talk) 13:52, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
 * We must have a reliable source to prove that his coat of arms has been changed before we can update the pictures in the article. Without a reliable source, even if a change is made, it will be rolled back by others.
 * There have been many related cases before, but in the end, in the absence of reliable sources, it was changed back to the old coat of arms of EIIR
 * File:Badge of the Metropolitan Police Service (Elizabeth II).svg 2401:E180:8892:2A09:C45D:3C1E:29E2:6085 (talk) 14:02, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Moreover, the crown in some coats of arms (like Canada) does not change automatically. The new version of the coat of arms should wait for Charles III to approve it.like it was in 1952. 2401:E180:8892:C657:CEBC:2ABD:97B6:3813 (talk) 15:26, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
 * The Canadian coat of arms did not use the St. Edward's Crown until 1957.
 * Arms of CanadaYou can see the introduction in the article.
 * An example is Flag of Queensland
 * , By 2023, Flag has not been replaced back to Tudor Crown. 2401:E180:8892:C657:CEBC:2ABD:97B6:3813 (talk) 15:42, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I think the coat of arms of Scotland you mentioned should be updated, can you ask someone to update it. 2401:E180:8802:678C:A3F4:2978:24E8:96D5 (talk) 04:35, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

The crown used in the Royal coat of arms of Scotland
I noticed that an editor switched back to using the Tudor Crown/St. Edward's Crown version of the Scottish coat of arms. Should we roll back this side edit. Exception, we need someone to help update the crown used in the coat of arms here File:Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom in Scotland (Variant 1).svg 2401:E180:8843:709D:5368:181C:5EDC:2C4A (talk) 12:45, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

 * Historically the English Lion has always been surmounted by whatever Crown was used by the Sovereign in the rest of the UK, in this case, The Tudor Crown and previously under Queen Elizabeth II, St. Edward's Crown. Personally, I believe the use of the Crown of Scotland on the English Lion is incorrect. GandalfXLD (talk) 08:51, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
 * This is the reference source on which the current consensus is based.
 * [Https://www.nrscotland.gov.uk/research/learning/features/queen-elizabeth-ii-and-scotland https://www.nrscotland.gov.uk/research/learning/features/queen-elizabeth-ii-and-scotland]
 * Here's a reference that other editors have suggested (thinking lions shouldn't use the Scottish crown).
 * The Heraldry Society of Scotland 2401:E180:8842:7FC3:24A9:34D4:2775:54D7 (talk) 09:46, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
 * In all the examples and links given the English Lion is clearly wearing the Tudor Crown. I'm not understanding why it would be the Crown of Scotland. GandalfXLD (talk) 14:52, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Exceptions We have seen quite a few examples, most of which use Scottish crowns.
 * I just found a picture on the webpage here, Lord Lyon King of Arms - Dr Joseph J. Morrow is an example of actual use.
 * I found a clearer version of this image, he seems to be using the Scottish Crown.
 * web 2401:E180:8842:7FC3:24A9:34D4:2775:54D7 (talk) 10:03, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Photos were taken before April 2022
 * https://article-imgs.scribdassets.com/1t7ki3gxj49q2gq8/images/file3VLFLPL1.jpg 2401:E180:8842:7FC3:24A9:34D4:2775:54D7 (talk) 10:07, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Sometimes the real heraldry regulations are really confusing, and I can't say which one must be right.
 * https://www.college-of-arms.gov.uk/news-grants/news/item/212-coronation-souvenir-guidelines 2401:E180:8890:3B3:26D3:5B34:9AB7:CED4 (talk) 16:44, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
 * The Lord Lyon is the head of Scottish Heraldry, him using the Crown of Scotland is expected. He's even permitted to wear a crown that is almost exactly similar to the Crown of Scotland with the Scottish Lion replacing the Cross on its top. GandalfXLD (talk) 14:51, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

 * The Crown used in the coat of arms of the Scottish State Coach is St. Edwards Crown, suggesting that the Scottish version of the Royal Coat of Arms uses whichever crown, St Edwards or Tudor, that the Sovereign prefers. In this case, the Tudor Crown. I've attached a close-up of the coach showing the coat of arms. GandalfXLD (talk) 14:54, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

Edits
I did just a few harmless edits to this article. Nothing bad, I swear it. RicLightning (talk) 14:59, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

Prince William's coat of arms as Prince of Wales
See Talk:William, Prince of Wales. RicLightning (talk) 16:19, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

HM Government logo
Regarding the Royal Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom (HM Government) we have replaced it with Tudor crown Is there any actual example in the end (?, it seems that some badges still use St. Edward's Crown instead of Tudor crown, and even this article (Coronation Souvenir Guidelines) published by college of Arms gives The example of St. Edward's Crown is not Tudor crown, and royal.uk is still St. Edward's Crown instead of Tudor crown.

2401:E180:8810:4F24:2B1B:7B7C:31AA:5E44 (talk) 16:09, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

 * These indicate that the St. Edward's Crown version of the Royal Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom will continue to be used in 2023, rather than until 2022. 2401:E180:8810:4F24:2B1B:7B7C:31AA:5E44 (talk) 16:19, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
 * We seem to be missing actual examples of Royal Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom (HM Government) using the Tudor crown. 2401:E180:8812:429:9E2F:1433:6C8C:E817 (talk) 16:28, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
 * It's only being replaced as and when old sites are removed or old uniforms are replaced. You can see the new arms on the coronation invitation: https://www.royal.uk/news-and-activity/2023-04-04/the-coronation-invitation. Celia Homeford (talk) 16:36, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm talking about Version used by the UK Government.
 * This is an example used by the UK Government (? 2401:E180:8812:429:9E2F:1433:6C8C:E817 (talk) 17:20, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I just saw that many websites (gov.uk/Royal.UK) have not replaced the Royal Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom with the Tudor crown version. (Coronation Souvenir Guidelines) published by college of Arms 2023 gives The example of St. Edward's Crown is not Tudor crown. 2401:E180:8812:429:9E2F:1433:6C8C:E817 (talk) 17:30, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
 * So it is wrong to think that the St. Edward's Crown version of the Royal Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom will only be used until 2022. And there is no evidence that the Version used by the UK Government has been replaced by the Tudor crown. 2401:E180:8812:429:9E2F:1433:6C8C:E817 (talk) 17:39, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
 * As I said, and as announced by the College of Arms, "It is the intention that the new cypher and new rendering of the Crown will be introduced gradually, and generally only when equipment or uniforms which bear them needs to be replaced." Celia Homeford (talk) 07:30, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
 * understand 2401:E180:8800:D0A2:6E8A:67BB:BF81:299B (talk) 16:15, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

Harp style
There's been a bit of back-and forth in the past couple of days about the style of harp used in the arms. I'm therefore opening this discussion to explore the issue.

Heraldically speaking, the harp can be depicted however the artist sees fit so long as the object is still recognisably a harp. This is because heraldry works from a blazon, or written description of a coat of arms, rather than a definitive visual example; as long as a depiction of a coat of arms fits that description heraldic artists have a lot of leeway over the exact style.

Wikipedia tends to use the winged harp for pre-Elizabeth II royal arms and the 'Gaelic' harp otherwise, but this is just our convention based on the prevailing trends of the time. There are examples of Gaelic harps from the reign of Victoria and winged harps from the reign of Elizabeth II. So long as readers are not confused about the above we don't need to show every variation, in the same way we don't show every style of crown which has been used. A.D.Hope (talk) 10:31, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

 * Is this the only picture from 1847(?, and are there other examples(?) that prove that ordinary harps were in use before the 1910s.
 * I think it is very inappropriate to omit the winged harp part, which makes people think that it has become a normal harp since 1837. I think a picture is necessary, otherwise it is an omission of the version that was mainly used from 1837 to 1952. 2401:E180:8821:A4E1:4C18:B2EB:8D4B:F00E (talk) 02:09, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
 * There is no '1837–1952 version' of the arms, their blazon hasn't changed from 1837 to the present. The winged style of harp was very common during Victoria's reign, but if you look through the 'Coats of Arms of Queen Victoria' Commons category you'll find a few examples of the Gaelic style. There are other examples, such as Westminster Bridge, and other pre-Elizabeth II examples, such as this example belonging to Mary of Teck. A.D.Hope (talk) 10:24, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I think it is very important to let readers identify the period of heraldry through pictures. It is not just a text introduction. The winged harp coat of arms without the Hanover coat of arms was widely used from 1837 to 1952., even after 1952 there are still some places still using this.
 * If you just use text to introduce it as you advocate without providing pictures at the time, it would not be appropriate to allow readers to identify the difference. 2401:E180:8821:7F12:925C:D734:2F9:2E07 (talk) 02:51, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I disagree. The primary purpose of 'development' table is to show the changes to the blazon, not the stylistic changes which have taken place over the centuries. A.D.Hope (talk) 10:26, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I personally think that omitting this picture will cause confusion for readers. (That’s what I thought when I read it) 2401:E180:8821:7F12:925C:D734:2F9:2E07 (talk) 02:56, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Not everyone can understand this difference through text alone, so I think it is necessary to put pictures for readers to compare (I think we at least provide users with a rough picture, and cannot rely on pure text introduction. ) 2401:E180:8821:9F29:D6A1:5549:9BB0:B65F (talk) 03:20, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Copyright?
Hi, there's a deletion nomination at commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Cabinet Office logo.svg that would benefit from input. I'm unclear from the page and discussions here if the coat of arms is still copyrighted somehow, or is in the public domain? Some seem to be here under fair use, others are PD, or even CC-BY-SA? Input welcome (and I'd encourage making copyright status clearer in this article!). Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:21, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Copyright
A discussion is going on at the Commons concerning the copyright status of several coats of arms that are in use on this page. Please feel free to share your comments and input at commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Coat of arms of Queen Camilla.svg. Thanks. Keivan.f Talk 18:28, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

Maintain use of St Edward's Crown version
Hi,

I am proposing that that St Edward's Crown version of the arms be used as the main image on this page. Whilst the Tudor Crown version has been used in some artistic depictions, as of May 2024 the vast majority of the arms currently officially used are the St Edward's Crown version. These include:
 * the royal family official website
 * the Lord Chamberlin, who describes the St Edwards version as the standard version on the 2023 official guidance on the use of the arms (page 5)
 * Official Buckingham palace correspondence, as seen in the 2024 King's cancer announcement
 * Version used by the UK government

The only places I can find the Tudor Crown version are:
 * Invitations to the coronation
 * Coronation roll

The is also a College of Arms blog post in 2022 stating they envisage the Tudor Crown to be used in arms, but that doesn't prove anything about the current status of the arms (WP:FUTURE)

In the absence of an official announcement that the depiction of the arms is changing, the image should reflect what the majority of reliable, published sources depict, which is the St Edwards version. Personally, I think that a change will happen, but it will likely take some time due to the number of places the arms are currently used. When that announcement is made, then it would be appropriate to make the change. Safes007 (talk) 00:25, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
 * The Tudor crown was used from 1901 to 1952. St Edward's Crown was then phased in over years. I see no particular reason to sweep 50 years of examples under the carpet or to show the Elizabethan version over the traditional one. Celia Homeford (talk) 07:51, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Coat of Arms of The Prince and Princess of Wales.
I'm beginning to think that we may not receive official confirmation from the College of Arms of what their new coat of arms will look like but I believe it would more than likely be the these two:

and.

Would it not be better to use them in the meantime until we get official versions from the College of arms, instead of two blank spaces. GandalfXLD (talk) 18:42, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

title: Talk:Coat of arms of the United Kingdom


text:
Urocyon

Urocyon (Greek: "tailed dog" ) is a genus of Canidae which includes the gray fox (Urocyon cinereoargenteus) and the island fox (Urocyon littoralis). These two fox species are found in the Western Hemisphere. Whole genome sequencing indicates that Urocyon is the most basal genus of the living canids. Fossils of what is believed to be the ancestor of the gray fox, Urocyon progressus, have been found in Kansas and date to the Upper Pliocene, with some undescribed specimens dating even older.

Cozumel fox
The Cozumel fox is a critically endangered or extinct small gray fox found on the island of Cozumel, Mexico. The last reported sighting was in 2001, but surveys focusing on this species have not yet been carried out.

The Cozumel fox has not been scientifically described, but is a dwarf form as is the island fox, but slightly larger being up to three-quarters the size of the gray fox. No skins or complete skulls of the Cozumel fox exist in any museum exhibitions, so scientists have mainly examined sub-fossils collected during archaeological excavations of Mayan civilizations who inhabited the island about 1,500–500 years ago. Upon evaluating bones from about 12 adult individuals, scientists have concluded that the Cozumel fox is extremely small – approximately 60-80% the body size of other mainland specimens.

The fox had been isolated on the island of Cozumel for at least 5,000 years, and probably far longer. This would indicate that Urocyon had colonized the island before the first arrival of humans there.

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Urocyon


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Killographic

This page is an archive of the discussion surrounding the proposed deletion of a page entitled Killographic.

The result of the debate was to delete the page with approximately 9 v. 2 people in favour of deletion.

 * Killographic "...is a new word spawned on Monday December 8th"". Andy Mabbett 16:11, 11 Dec 2003 (UTC)
 * Beat me to it. Delete. Bmills 16:19, 11 Dec 2003 (UTC)
 * Could be redirected to Video game controversy but if it isn't a real word, I'm not sure there's any benefit in that. Angela. 16:45, 11 Dec 2003 (UTC)
 * I've added the definition, but even so, I don't think it's worth keeping here. Wiktionary, maybe.  Or maybe not.  Wait and see if the word catches on.  Delete.  Ortonmc 03:06, 12 Dec 2003 (UTC)
 * I had a description already up. It is not truely a real word yet. Words aren't considered 'real' until posted in an official dictionary. None of you however are making a strong point on why it should be deleted, except "it doesn't belong here". So I am saying to keep Fizscy46 04:09, 12 Dec 2003 (UTC)
 * I think it doesn't belong here because it is not an encyclopedia article, it is a poor dictionary entry for what may or may not turn out to be a word. Bmills 09:18, 12 Dec 2003 (UTC)
 * Of course its poor, I started it 24 hours ago. You have to give it some time to accumulate, rather then immediately delete it.Fizscy46 14:40, 12 Dec 2003 (UTC)
 * I think this only valid as an example of a word made up for political reasons, and if anything should be a redirect to page describing this. The article admits it was made up by a lobby group. The word itself does not deserve an entry - as if we do that we are just helping their campaign to bring their creation into common useage. (maybe compare with the US use of homicide bomber instead of suicide bomber, and the British use of asylum seeker rather than refugee.) Secretlondon 14:56, Dec 12, 2003 (UTC)
 * Keep. Marginal neologism but political significance (motivation behind) of coinage justifies article.  --Daniel C. Boyer 15:57, 12 Dec 2003 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not encyclopedic -- BCorr ¤ Брайен 18:55, 12 Dec 2003 (UTC)
 * Made up or not, it is still just a word and a definition. Move to Wikitionary or just delete. However, another option is to prepare an article on the "media" group, with this as an entry in that article - Marshman 01:26, 13 Dec 2003 (UTC)
 * Delete. Daniel Quinlan 08:51, Dec 13, 2003 (UTC)
 * Delete, made up. Even if it wasn't, it would still be a dictionary definition. Maximus Rex 19:27, 18 Dec 2003 (UTC)


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of US Presidents by estimated IQ

Pre-rewrite and renaming comments

 * List_of_US_Presidents_by_estimated_IQ Snopes says this is a spoof. Quincy 08:06, 12 Dec 2003 (UTC)
 * Delete, POV hoax Gentgeen 08:24, 12 Dec 2003 (UTC)
 * Misinformation. Delete. It's fine now. Keep. --MIRV 08:34, 12 Dec 2003 (UTC)
 * Even if it isn't a hoax it should be deleted because "IQ" is a totally unscientific and reactionary piece of crap. :) Adam 08:45, 12 Dec 2003 (UTC)
 * But of course! We should delete IQ, Standardized testing and Flynn effect, not to mention Psychoanalysis, George W. Bush and Global Warming! Delete keys at the ready - GO! -- Look upon my works, ye Mighty, and despair! 09:17, 12 Dec 2003 (UTC)
 * is the existence of George W Bush dependent on the validity of pseudo-scientific intelligence measuring? Adam 13:14, 12 Dec 2003 (UTC)
 * No, he's a totally unscientific and reactionary piece of crap. 209.102.125.227
 * Delete (despite the fact that i actually agree with the positioning of GWB) Muriel Victoria 13:17, 12 Dec 2003 (UTC)
 * Very funny. But delete. Sorry. Anjouli 14:07, 12 Dec 2003 (UTC)

Post rewrite comments

 * Keep in current form. Pcb21 has replaced the hoax with an article about the hoax. Rossami 14:50, 12 Dec 2003 (UTC)
 * In the unlikely event that we decide to include email hoaxes, the text of the e-mail should be included. Anjouli 17:40, 12 Dec 2003 (UTC)
 * Keep now modified artcle about the hoax. Reproduce the original hoax in this article. 80.255 20:34, 12 Dec 2003 (UTC)
 * Keep, Rename so "Hoax" is in the title, Provide a link to page history for people than want to see the e-mail. mydogategodshat 21:09, 12 Dec 2003 (UTC)
 * Delete, title is POV and indicates it is about a real article not an article about an insignificant and rather nonconvincing hoax. (Democrat average IQ is apparently 156 and Republican average IQ is apparently 115, Republicans are 5 dumbest presidents and Democrats the smartest 3.  I'm really impressed by the sophistication of this.)  Daniel Quinlan 21:31, Dec 12, 2003 (UTC)
 * Not a very useful article by itself. Maybe it could be part of a List of e-mail hoaxes? Angela. 21:41, 12 Dec 2003 (UTC)
 * Keep info on hoax, as own article or as part of another; I for one have heard this rumor several times. If own article, move to some other title; "List of..." is clearly not appropriate for the new version. -- VV 22:44, 12 Dec 2003 (UTC)
 * Delete. Granted that hoaxes are a legitimate topic, I don't feel that this particular one is important enough to be on the 'pedia. Tualha 02:02, 13 Dec 2003 (UTC)
 * Vote changed to keep. The article is now informative and well-named, and the fact that some major newspapers were taken in makes it worth debunking, to my mind - this should be a place where people come to find out the truth. Tualha 04:15, 14 Dec 2003 (UTC)
 * Keep the info on the topic. There's no need to limit ourselves. The title ought to be a redirect. -- Cyan 02:16, 13 Dec 2003 (UTC)
 * If article is deleted, please preserve the info somewhere. Debunking of urban legends is good.  Isomorphic 10:16, 13 Dec 2003 (UTC)
 * I agree. I think Angela's idea would be a good solution. Tualha 12:58, 13 Dec 2003 (UTC)

Comments after page move and further rewrite

 * I've moved the page to US Presidents IQ hoax whilst the debate continues, keeping redirect. Keeping the redirect and keeping the new page are both live issues to my mind. Pete/Pcb21 (talk) 14:01, 13 Dec 2003 (UTC)
 * When I wrote the original stub my aim was to cover up the hoax information that we were currently purveying. Because I expected the article to be deleted, I didn't do much of a job. However because there was some support for keeping the article, even just that stub, I decided to add more to the article. I'm still not greatly pleased with it for two reasons - 1) is this forwarded email all that important? - 2) the only source around for this is the snopes article and it feels a bit like we are just hijacking their research. Pete/Pcb21 (talk) 14:30, 13 Dec 2003 (UTC)
 * Keep. I went to the article expecting another nutty conspiracy page but in its rewritten form it is NPOV and informative. This sort of hoax debunking deserves an article. (BTW I got an email at work yesterday showing GW Bush in two 'ain't he dumb' pictures that had everyone in stitches. One showed el presidente with the military looking through a binoculars. He didn't notice however (but the photographer did) that the lens caps on his set were still on! Another showed him with a kid in a nursery school. He was talking to her. But whereas she had her kiddie's book the right way up, he had his copy clearly upside down! And this man has his finger on the nuclear button. Jeez. FearÉIREANN 23:07, 13 Dec 2003 (UTC)
 * God knows I'm no fan of Emperor George, but there are plenty of serious reasons to dislike him without dragging in these. The "book upside down" photo is faked - see snopes 1. The binocular photo may be legitimate, but it's meaningless - see snopes 2. Tualha 04:15, 14 Dec 2003 (UTC)
 * That shows the need for a page like this, to debunk myths like this. But they do play on the popular image worldwide that George W. has the intellect of Mickey Mouse. A page exploring the phenomenon of such myths and urban legends is necessary. The IQ nonsense is an obvious example of what needs exposing. This article, now rewritten, does that which is why we need it. FearÉIREANN 05:55, 14 Dec 2003 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is not snopes.com. --Jiang | Talk 04:20, 14 Dec 2003 (UTC)
 * True; we shouldn't cover most online hoaxes. However, see my comments above as to why we should keep this one. Tualha 05:50, 14 Dec 2003 (UTC)
 * I think the essential point of the article is that so many were duped by the spoof/hoax, not that the hoax is a hoax. Pete/Pcb21 (talk) 22:09, 14 Dec 2003 (UTC)
 * Delete, useless information. If kept, go with Angela's proposal. --Jiang | Talk 04:20, 14 Dec 2003 (UTC)
 * Given the number of pages on the web that propogate this hoax, I rather think that it would be useFUL pages for those people, even if you personally find it useless. Pete/Pcb21 (talk) 22:09, 14 Dec 2003 (UTC)
 * Delete, this is just a rehash of the snopes article with less information. But, if it's kept, I think Angela's solution provides a worthy compromise. —Minesweeper 11:10, 14 Dec 2003 (UTC)
 * Not entirely true - for example some of the most pertinent facts are included here not on Snopes a) a list of newspapers that got duped b) the original source of the spoof. Pete/Pcb21 (talk) 22:09, 14 Dec 2003 (UTC)
 * Yes, I agree with you now. The article is much better now, especially without the source text (and I don't think it should include a copy of the email--that's readily available as is).  I guess this is just the nature of the wiki. —Minesweeper 04:26, 15 Dec 2003 (UTC)
 * Listing the hoax on List of e-mail hoaxes would be a good idea (when that page exists), but it has nothing to do with the question we're discussing. It's like saying that Queen Elizabeth should be listed at List of British monarchs; that's true, but doesn't tell us anything about whether or not she should get her own page. The only relevant concern is whether or not there is enough verifiable information for a separate page to be worthwhile. In this case, there clearly is, as can been seen by looking at the page. -- Oliver P. 17:04, 14 Dec 2003 (UTC)
 * I think the article is definitely NPOV and if anything apologist towards Bush. Goodralph 17:10, 14 Dec 2003 (UTC)

I'm removing this from VfD, as there is clearly no consensus for deletion (I oppose deletion, for the record).—Eloquence 04:17, Dec 15, 2003 (UTC)


text:
Bez (dancer)

Mark Berry (born 18 April 1964), better known as Bez, is an English percussionist, dancer, DJ and media personality. He is best known as a member of the rock bands Happy Mondays and Black Grape.

Early life
Mark Berry was born on 18 April 1964 in Bolton, Lancashire, the son of parents from the Norris Green district of Liverpool. His father was a detective inspector. He grew up in Little Hulton and Walkden, before moving to live with his grandparents in Wigan at the age of 16.

Career
Bez is best known as the maraca player, dancer, and de facto mascot of rock band Happy Mondays, having been invited by lead singer Shaun Ryder shortly after the band was formed. He is chiefly remembered for his bizarre style of dancing and use of maracas. The band's second single, "Freaky Dancin'", was rumoured to be a tribute to Bez. However, Ryder stated that this was not the case in his autobiography Twistin' My Melon.

After the Happy Mondays broke up, Bez became a member of Ryder's next group Black Grape, but he left them in 1997. That year, he had a feature on the BBC Two television programme The Sunday Show called Science with Bez. When both men faced large tax bills, Bez and Ryder reformed the Happy Mondays in 1998, but it was short-lived. A book about his experiences in both bands, Freaky Dancin' (ISBN 0-330-48197-5), was published by Pan MacMillan in 1998. In the opening chapter, Bez detailed an incident during a Happy Mondays gig at Manchester's Haçienda nightclub in 1986. In the middle of the set, he fell off the stage and cut his forehead. In the book, he writes, "The doc tells me to take it easy and put my feet up. I thought, 'I'm not fucking havin' that.' I got some of [lead guitarist] Moose's acid, dripped it in the cut and ran back out with me shakers. Fuckin' raz!"

He appeared on Celebrity Big Brother in 2005, in order to pay off his outstanding tax bills, and was voted as the winner of the series. He used some of his winnings to improve the engine of his London black cab; the television show Pimp My Ride UK customised it to make it suit him. After the cab was "pimped", it had twenty speakers, eight amps, two DVD players, fifteen TV screens and a camera on the grille linked to one of the screens, the sign saying TAXI on the top was changed to PIMP, and it had purple paint on the outside.

The New Musical Express (NME) carried a series of articles about famous members of bands whose musical contribution to their bandmates' success was negligible. The newspaper used the name "Bez" as a generic label for Chas Smash of Madness, Andrew Ridgeley of Wham!, Andy Fletcher of Depeche Mode, Paul Morley of Art of Noise, Linda McCartney of Wings, and Paul Rutherford of Frankie Goes to Hollywood.

In 2006, Bez was promoting a compilation album titled Bez's Madchester Anthems: Sorted Tunes from Back in the Day. The Happy Mondays again reformed: the third incarnation of the group had Bez touring with them. On 2 July 2007, they released their first studio album in 15 years entitled Uncle Dysfunktional. On 4 September 2007, Bez went head-to-head with royal correspondent James Whitaker on ITV television programme Don't Call Me Stupid and beat him. Bez and James taught each other about their respective specialist subjects: the Manchester music scene and royal etiquette, and then they were quizzed on what they had learnt. This was followed by a general knowledge round. Despite not knowing that the Queen has two birthdays, Bez won. His prize, as selected by James, was a bottle of expensive red wine and a decanter so he didn't have to drink any "poor person's supermarket plonk".

Bez took part in Series 4 of Adrenaline Junkie (aired on 1 October 2008 on ITV2), the tasks involved taking on the world's biggest bungee down the front of the dam which featured in GoldenEye, building an ice hotel in the mountains, and undertook a jump from one cable car to another. On 29 January 2012, Ryder announced on the radio station XFM that the band would return with the original and definitive line-up of himself, his brother Paul Ryder on bass, Bez, Gary Whelan on drums, Rowetta as backing vocalist, Mark Day on guitar and Paul Davis on keyboards. They appeared on ITV's This Morning, and were interviewed by Phillip Schofield. The band announced in September 2012 that they were writing their first album with the original line-up in more than 20 years.

Bez was announced as the headliner on the DJ stage at upcoming festival Party in the Pines on 3 May 2014. In September 2018, he took part in a special episode of Bargain Hunt where he and Rowetta competed against Jarvis Cocker and Candida Doyle from Pulp. Bez and Rowetta won the episode by earning a profit of £8, but it was later discovered that Firouzeh Razavi, at that time Bez's girlfriend, had bought two of their items. As it was against the rules of the programme for friends and family of the teams to buy items the teams were selling, Cocker and Doyle were made the winners and Bez had to hand over £8 from his own pocket.

Personal life
Berry lives in Urmston, Greater Manchester. He is a fan of Manchester United. He is a beekeeper and beer brewer in his spare time, and has lived on land-shares in Herefordshire and Wales. At some point, he lived next door to Ryder in Padfield, Derbyshire.

Bez was declared bankrupt in 2005 and 2008.

In August 2010, Bez was convicted of physically assaulting his ex-girlfriend Monica Ward, with whom he has a son, by throttling and threatening to kill her. He was sentenced to four weeks in prison after having first received a community service sentence but refusing to co-operate. He was arrested at London's Euston Station in November 2010 for breaching a restraining order granted to Ward following the assault, and escorted to appear before magistrates in Manchester. Bez also has two older sons.

In November 2014, Bez became a patron of homeless organisation Coffee4Craig. The organisation started in 2013 when married couple Risha and Hendrix Lancaster lost Risha's brother, Craig White, to a heroin overdose while sleeping rough. He is very active in his support, even inviting them to join him on the onstage bed in London during a Black Grape gig and frequently discussing the issue of homelessness.

Bez stood as a candidate for the Salford and Eccles constituency in the 2015 UK General Election. The incumbent Member of Parliament (MP), Hazel Blears, announced her intention to stand down at the election. Bez ran on a platform of "free energy, free food and free anything". He received 703 votes (1.6% of the total turnout) which placed him in sixth position in the constituency. The seat was won by the new Labour Party candidate, Rebecca Long-Bailey, who received 21,364 votes (49.4% of the total).

In January 2021, during the third lockdown of the COVID-19 pandemic, Bez began operating as an online fitness instructor producing content on YouTube under the title "Buzzin’ with Bez".

Bez married his partner fitness instructor Firouzeh Razavi 39 on 3 September 2022. The two had been in a relationship since 2014. Bez had made a Wooden Stonehenge for a Game of Thrones style wedding.

In popular culture
In the film 24 Hour Party People, Bez is played by Chris Coghill.

In the sitcom The Royle Family, Antony announces that he will be managing a band called "Exit", which will partly be inspired by Happy Mondays, with one of the members doing an imitation of Bez.

In the comedy series Peep Show, Jeremy gets a mercy spot in a band called the Executioner's Bong as they tell him he can "get in on maracas". Jeremy protests, "I won't be Bez. I wanna be in there on merit!"

In Series 10, Episode 6 of Would I Lie to You?, Rhod Gilbert claimed to have been "exactly like the Bez but with a guitar" in a band called "Muckspreader".

In August 2021, it was announced that Bez would be a competitor on BBC's Celebrity MasterChef and in October 2021 that he would be a competitor on the fourteenth series of Dancing on Ice in 2022.

title: Bez (dancer)


text:
List of political parties in North Korea

North Korea, officially the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, is formally a one-party state under the leadership of the Workers' Party of Korea (WPK) as the sole governing party. There are also two other minor parties that must accept the WPK's "leading role" as a condition of their existence.

As of the latest election in 2019, three parties (WPK, Korean Social Democratic Party, and Chondoist Chongu Party) and one organization (Chongryon) are represented in the Supreme People's Assembly, the country's unicameral parliament.

North Korean opposition parties
There is currently no known organized opposition within North Korea that is independently verifiable. However, there are various exiled dissident groups that advocate for regime change. In 2024, U.S state-run news outlet Radio Free Asia claimed there may be opposition parties within North Korea.

 * Free Joseon
 * North Korea Freedom Coalition
 * Fighters for a Free North Korea
 * North Korean People's Liberation Front