text:
Talk:sexodus

RFV discussion: August 2016–April 2017
Many hits for and scannos of Israel's Exodus. Having trouble locating anything similar to the reported def Leasnam (talk) 16:03, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
 * There is one set of clear uses, all by author Milo on [Breitbart]. One clear cite for that is:
 * Following on from the Breitbart uses are a number of mentions, such as:
 * I found another use, albeit in quotes, which is not explicitly linked to Breitbart on SDE Entertainment News:
 * Then there are a couple of headlines that use the term for a slightly different meaning, for movements within the sex industry:
 * and a reference to the 2013 headline:
 * Taken all together, it looks like a term that is being pushed heavily by one person but not yet truly adopted, plus a couple of protoneologisms. Kiwima (talk) 18:36, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Then there are a couple of headlines that use the term for a slightly different meaning, for movements within the sex industry:
 * and a reference to the 2013 headline:
 * Taken all together, it looks like a term that is being pushed heavily by one person but not yet truly adopted, plus a couple of protoneologisms. Kiwima (talk) 18:36, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
 * and a reference to the 2013 headline:
 * Taken all together, it looks like a term that is being pushed heavily by one person but not yet truly adopted, plus a couple of protoneologisms. Kiwima (talk) 18:36, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Taken all together, it looks like a term that is being pushed heavily by one person but not yet truly adopted, plus a couple of protoneologisms. Kiwima (talk) 18:36, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Taken all together, it looks like a term that is being pushed heavily by one person but not yet truly adopted, plus a couple of protoneologisms. Kiwima (talk) 18:36, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

 * RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 21:53, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:sexodus


text: moghense

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: moghense


text:
دوستانہ

Etymology
. Compare 🇨🇬 /, 🇨🇬 /.

Adjective

 * 1) friendly

title: دوستانہ


text: quamen

title: quamen


text: nøgt

title: nøgt


text: nøgde

title: nøgde


text:
Talk:trevi

RFV discussion: November 2016–April 2017
"(derogatory) A person from the Trevethin area of South Wales." I can't find anything even in a Web search. Note that trev exists as a synonym for chav, but with a totally different etymology. Perhaps that was a source of confusion here. Equinox ◑ 19:40, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
 * RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 06:21, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:trevi


text:
Talk:wikiauthor

RFV discussion: November 2016–April 2017
Not sure about this without a space. Equinox ◑ 21:26, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Only one BGC hit turned out to be genuine. RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 06:25, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:wikiauthor


text:
Talk:selfsucker

RFV discussion: November 2016–April 2017
1. Person who performs oral sex on self. 2. Animal that drinks own milk. Even if I add a hyphen, there's virtually nothing to be found in Google Books. Equinox ◑ 19:32, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
 * There seem to be a good number of hits for the first definition in Google Groups- it's apparently an established subgenre of online porn. I'm skeptical about the second definition. Chuck Entz (talk) 19:50, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I have cited the first definition.
 * I could cite the second def with a hyphen (self-sucker), but not without (I converted it to an alt-form in case cites can be found). —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 03:53, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
 * The first citation is most likely of figurative use. The speaker hardly means that he'd accept help only from those who can lick their dicks. --Hekaheka (talk) 22:16, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I think that's exactly what he means. Considering the name of the forum where he posted, he's asking for advice on exercises to become flexible enough to perform autofellatio. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 22:56, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
 * This reminds me of an old quip: "Why do dogs lick their dicks?" --??? --"Because they can." --Hekaheka (talk) 07:28, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

 * Sense 1 RFV passed and sense 2 RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 06:19, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:selfsucker


text: ghegaen

title: ghegaen


text:
Talk:castrate

RFV discussion: November 2016–April 2017
Rfv-sense: to remove the ovaries of. Ƿidsiþ 12:56, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Though "castrate [female animal]" seems more common, there are plenty of hits for "castrated [female animal]" on Google Books. Just try ewes". Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk) 14:11, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
 * But hasn't a castrated female animal had the entire uterus removed, not just the ovaries? —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 14:21, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Maybe it could mean that, but here they specifically say the ovaries. There's also a bunch of hits talking about uterine blood flow in castrated ewes, which they presumably wouldn't care about if the uterus had been removed. DTLHS (talk) 17:21, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I guess usage often isn't sufficiently specific between removal of the ovaries, uterus or both — it must have been obvious enough to the people who used it that they didn't have to specify. How about a general "to remove the ovaries and/or uterus of"? Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk) 13:17, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

 * RFV passed with the modified definition per LBD. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 06:09, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:castrate


text:
Talk:เสื้อสีแดง

RFV discussion: December 2016–April 2017
Usually heard of เสื้อแดง, but not เสื้อสีแดง. --Octahedron80 (talk) 03:49, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Agreed. No one uses เสื้อสีแดง, but เสื้อแดง. The page เสื้อสีแดง was originally created by Stephen G. Brown and was renamed เสื้อแดง by YURi, who later made เสื้อสีแดง an alternative-form page for เสื้อแดง. But I think เสื้อสีแดง should be deleted. --หมวดซาโต้ (talk) 08:02, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

 * RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 06:07, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:เสื้อสีแดง


text:
Talk:roboreous

RFV discussion: November 2016–April 2017
Both senses. DTLHS (talk) 02:10, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

 * I found enough cites for the second, more metaphoric sense, but not for the literal meaning as "oaken". Kiwima (talk) 22:24, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

 * Sense 1 RFV failed; sense 2 RFV passed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 06:11, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:roboreous


text:
Talk:belarusso

RFV discussion: November 2016–April 2017
Portuguese. — Ungoliant (falai) 13:15, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

 * On pt:w:Bielorrússia, it lists: Gentílico: bielorrusso (a); belarusso (a). However, I cannot find a single hit for belarusso in Google Books. I'd say delete. —Stephen (Talk) 11:37, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

 * RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 06:14, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:belarusso


text:
Talk:musclabilité

RFV discussion: December 2016–April 2017
Tagged but not listed. Seems believable, but I could not find anything in BGC or GGC. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 19:49, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
 * There's a guy using multiple ip addresses to add plausible but rubbish French entries. All nicely formatted. Some of them are rare but real. Not sure about this one so I left it. SemperBlotto (talk) 07:38, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
 * The only use I found anywhere were:
 * Wikipédia:Oracle/Semaine 20 2011
 * Wikipédia:Oracle/semaine 33 2014 (referring to the previous instance.) - Amgine/t·e 23:03, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
 * RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 06:03, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:musclabilité


text:
Talk:Plameology

RFV discussion: December 2016–April 2017
References a non-durable blogger and a TV report that only used "Plameologists". Nothing in Google Books. Equinox ◑ 09:34, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Google books found one occurrence (although with a hyphen): --Jan Kameníček (talk) 18:36, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

 * RFV failed. The only way this could be potentially saved is by considering it a hot word, but I do not think it is a good candidate for that. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 06:06, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:Plameology


text:
Talk:block

RFV discussion: December 2016–April 2017
Rfv-sense noun-sense # 19: "A section of split logs used as fuel."

I don't find this in other dictionaries plus it seems different from other senses, which convey an idea of something solid and complete. --Hekaheka (talk) 09:19, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

 * I have added three citations (along the lines of "another block on the fire"), though I suppose one could argue that they fall under "a substantial, often approximately cuboid, piece of any substance". Equinox ◑ 09:36, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

 * It doesn't have to be logs. Blocks of compressed wood chips, sawdust or even paper are also sometimes used, though they are more often called briquettes.  I agree that it's really just a special case of sense 1.    D b f  i  r  s   17:22, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
 * User:Dbfirs you have contradicted yourself. Compress blocks are called briquettes. They are distinctly different from the blocks described in the definition.  Not sure if this needs a regional tag, but this meaning is wide-spread and distinct in Ireland, and I think also in the UK also.--Dmol (talk) 19:51, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Oh, I see them described as blocks, too, but perhaps this varies by region as you suggest. Is there a valid distinct sense?    D b f  i  r  s   20:31, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

 * Note also the existence of Yule block. Equinox ◑ 15:14, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

 * RFV passed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 06:04, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

RFV discussion: December 2020
RFV sense 4.1:

 * 4. A contiguous group of urban lots of property, typically several acres in extent, not crossed by public streets.
 * I'm going for a walk around the block.
 * 1. The distance from one street to another in a city that is built (approximately) to a grid pattern.
 * The place you are looking for is two long blocks east and one short block north.

Seeking verification (by opinion, I guess, since citations probably won't help resolve it) that 4.1 is a separate sense from 4. For instance, I could say "He sits three desks away from me" but that doesn't IMO make a separate dictionary sense of "desk". Or, if the presence of qualifiers "long" and "short" are supposed to be a distinctive point, then I can equally well find examples such as "Great location only two short streets away from the main central square". Is there anything special about "block" that merits the extra sense of 4.1? Mihia (talk) 22:24, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
 * They are different to me. You can replace a use of sense 4.1 with a distance in feet or meters.  Vox Sciurorum (talk) 23:13, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I would make a couple of commments on that. First, the "long" and "short" modifiers seem to me to be deliberately chosen to justify the sense (though I cannot be certain), yet there is no such thing as a "short" or "long" metre. Secondly, "three desks away" could equally be expressed in feet or metres. Mihia (talk)
 * I see them as at least slightly different. For starters, 4 refers to area, whereas 4.1 is a unit of length/distance. I would also tend to use phrases like "around the block" in cities/towns that are not on a grid system, whereas I wouldn't talk about "walking several blocks" in that case, which to me justifies "in a city that is built (approximately) to a grid pattern" as expressing a greater specificity or a distinctness relative to the main definition. I think it's appropriate to keep one as a subsense of the other, but I do think there is a legitimate distinction to be made. Andrew Sheedy (talk) 05:09, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
 * In the US, at least, a city block is one of those informal units of measure used to help people visualize large numbers, like a football field or an olympic-sized swimming pool. For instance, the length of the Titanic is described in several books in terms of city blocks. Just plain "blocks" seems less standardized and less used in the abstract, but it's still used a lot to describe distances, especially when giving directions.
 * As for the "long" and "short" blocks: Manhattan is probably the most common location on which block measurements are modeled, and it's much longer than wide, but with far fewer north-south streets than east-west. That means the blocks are wider east-west than their north-south length. In Manhattan, at least, you're talking about two different block measurements depending on the direction, so it makes perfect sense to talk about long blocks and short blocks. Chuck Entz (talk) 07:49, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
 * City blocks are usually not close to square, so the long/short distinction is necessary for a block count to be a useful measure. In my experience, using block as a measure of distance is common in an urban area only if the grid pattern is fairly regular, as it is in several gridded parts of Manhattan, Queens, Bronx, and Brooklyn. In my experience, such grids are limited to areas laid out in the 19th century and early 20th centuries.
 * In giving driving directions it is not distance being indicated, but rather useful small-scale landmarks. This is not limited to gridded areas. The use is comparable to using stop signs or traffic lights in providing directions.
 * I'm not sure whether we need a separate definition of block (or stop sign or (traffic) light for the usage in giving directions. DCDuring (talk) 09:54, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

 * Thanks for the comments. If we compare e.g. the example given by Chuck Entz of "city block" being used to measure the Titanic, I think the problem with the present usex at "block" 4.1 is that, because "block" is being used here about actual city blocks, it is impossible to prove which sense is intended -- the literal one or the measurement one. I think it would help solidify 4.1 if we could give an example of "block" used to measure something other than actual city blocks. Mihia (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I added one use in the sense familiar to me, "about as long as a city block", in a context that is clearly not about walking any specific blocks in any specific city. Vox Sciurorum (talk) 14:00, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks; for me, the hypothetical nature of the example "I couldn't walk three blocks with the Danish woman's bulging backpack" does not seem in itself persuasive. A literal usage would always seem to license a hypothetical one, as far as I can see. For example, if the context is known to be trains, then perhaps one could say "I walked ten carriages with that bag", and then it would follow that one could also say, hypothetically, "I couldn't walk ten carriages with that bag". Is there a qualitative difference between "carriages" and "blocks"? I'm not sure. On the other hand, it seems harder than expected to think of plausible and comparable substitutions of "arbitrary" (not specifically measurement) nouns into the "couldn't walk three blocks" sentence, especially substitutions that would be understood generally as measurements, without special guiding context, so I'm coming to the view that this separate sense for "block" is most probably justified. Mihia (talk) 02:18, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

RFV-passed Kiwima (talk) 21:31, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

title: Talk:block


text: ghebeden

title: ghebeden


text: ghedaen

title: ghedaen


text:
Talk:shame

RFV discussion: December 2016–April 2017
Sense: "(archaic) That which is shameful and private, especially body parts."

There is a cite proposed: Bible, Isa. xlvii. 3
 * "Thy nakedness shall be uncovered, yea, thy shame shall be seen: I will take vengeance, and I will not meet thee as a man." (KJV)
 * "Your nakedness will be exposed and your shame uncovered. I will take vengeance; I will spare no one.”" (NIV)
 * "Your nakedness shall be uncovered, and your disgrace shall be seen. I will take vengeance, and I will spare no one." (ESV)

I don't read Hebrew, but it looks like "shame" here is just a literal translation of the Hebrew word for shame. It's not an archaic use (as shown by the NIV), and I don't know that the English here is referring to body parts instead of going from a concrete form of exposure to a more figurative one. I don't know whether we need this entry at all; extending an emotion like shame, pride or hope to cover the thing that causes the shame, pride or hope is standard literary form. (Maybe this should have been an RfD, but three good cites may make this a lot clearer, and a lack of cites will justify disposing of it.)--Prosfilaes (talk) 22:38, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

 * Here's one I found immediately
 * 2004, Darlene Barriere, On My Own Terms:
 * I crossed my arms to cover my naked body, to cover my shame.

 * I wonder if the misinterpretation of the biblical reference (if that be the case) has actually led to the word being used subsequently in this way...(?) Leasnam (talk) 23:01, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

 * Yeah, okay. I'm going to remove the archaic, and if someone else wants to close the RFV itself, they're welcome to.--Prosfilaes (talk) 23:31, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

 * RFV passed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 06:00, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

---000000070000007

 * semi(qumeran-script) origin  for the eng. word  "shame"?  aram. syr : "šwmh"
 * http://cal.huc.edu/oneentry.php?lemma=%24wmh%20N&cits=all

Zoren999 (talk) 07:43, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

 * No. Did you read the entry? Unless someone forged a lot of entries, there's a Middle English word shame from an Old English word shamu (both normalized into modern English orthography) that's similar to a bunch of words in other Germanic languages (and sh is frequently sk in other Germanic languages), all of which have seemingly gone through little to no semantic shift. There's no reason to assume a origin in anything but Proto-Germanic.--Prosfilaes (talk) 08:27, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

Separate etymologies?
I'm not very familiar with conventions around etymologies, but I'm surprised to see the noun/interjection be in a different etymology section than the verb, since they seem very closely related. Is this an error? Colin M (talk) 16:21, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Notes about etymology: This word seems clearly related to the Persian and Urdu word شرم, Russian срам, reconstructed Proto-Slavic/sormъ, German Scham, etc. Yet as of 2024-03, most of those wiktionary entries reference different Proto-Indo-European roots. That must be incorrect, since obviously all of these would go back to the same Proto-Indo-European word. Sdarwin2 (talk) 23 March 2024 (UTC)

English noun definitions
I'm fairly certain that definitions 4 and 5 are the same thing, and that use of the word to refer to private parts (a use which doesn't necessarily mean the speaker considers them shameful) should be considered a separate definition and identified as a colloquialism (or something along those lines). CrisH7 (talk) 21:41, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

interjection
To react sympathetically to something disappointing, Shame, old friend, we would have invited you if we'd known you were free. --Backinstadiums (talk) 10:44, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:shame


text:
Talk:Wikiwöörbook

RFV discussion: December 2016–April 2017
German Low German. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 23:07, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
 * RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 05:47, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:Wikiwöörbook


text:
Talk:Khas Nepali

RFV discussion: December 2016–April 2017
Italian? DTLHS (talk) 19:58, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Seems unlikely. Nothing similar in Italian Wikipedia. SemperBlotto (talk) 12:03, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

 * The Khas people (of Nepal and nearby parts of India, Myanmar, and Bhutan) spoke the Khas language, also known as Khas Kura, Parbate Bhasa, or Gorkhali. In the 1930s, the name of the language was changed from Khas language to the Nepali language. However, the term Nepali can also refer to other languages of Nepal, so it is a bit ambiguous. You could say "Khas Nepali" (English, not Italian) if you felt the need to be specific, but normally it is just called Nepali. —Stephen (Talk) 11:03, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

 * Italian entry RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 05:51, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:Khas Nepali


text:
Talk:gherkin

RFV discussion: December 2016–April 2017
Penis. Is this used outside of ? Equinox ◑ 15:16, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

 * I've heard it use outside of it, but I just thought it was metaphorical usage Leasnam (talk) 15:17, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

 * If so, still presumably worth a sense, since only certain phallic-object words can mean penis (e.g. "sausage" but not "thumb"). Equinox ◑ 15:19, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

 * Sure. I've added some cites Leasnam (talk) 15:24, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

 * Only certain phallic-object words can mean penis? "thumb" is not terribly phallic, compared to the middle finger, and makes for more confusing slang as another body-part. I'm pretty sure just about anything even vaguely phallic can mean penis.--Prosfilaes (talk) 02:42, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

 * Some long hard things that AFAIK can't mean penis: pen, pencil (outside of "pencil dick"), plank, (tree) trunk, gearstick... Equinox ◑ 15:33, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

 * trunk, gearstick, plank, pencil DTLHS (talk) 15:42, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

 * New competition, try and find any noun in any language which has never been used to refer to genitalia or drugs. - TheDaveRoss 15:47, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
 * The new Wiktionary competition? We haven't played anything for a while...--Derrib9 (talk) 07:55, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
 * As the Arctic Monkeys once sang, "Was it a Mecca dobber or a betting pencil?" Smurrayinchester (talk) 15:44, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

 * RFV passed. The last citation was from a poem that didn't exactly work to attest the meaning, so I replaced it with a better citation. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 05:57, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:gherkin


text:
yidiiłkǫǫh

Etymology
.

Verb

 * 1) he/she is making it smooth, smoothing it down

Verbal stems

 * IMPERFECTIVE: -kǫǫh
 * PERFECTIVE: -kǫʼ
 * FUTURE: -kǫǫł
 * ITERATIVE: -kǫǫh
 * OPTATIVE: -kǫǫh

title: yidiiłkǫǫh


text: ghewonnen

title: ghewonnen


text:
Talk:chromista

RFV discussion: December 2016–April 2017
Any alga of the taxon Chromista. I can't find it in lower case or with a plural chromistas. Equinox ◑ 18:11, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Three somewhat questionable cites added (one is from a publisher summary and not from an actual book, one is probably translated from Spanish). DTLHS (talk) 18:29, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

 * Did you try Google Scholar? I can find several lower-case citations:       as well as a few plurals  Kiwima (talk) 18:59, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I can only see the fourth and sixth cites as the others in the singular are behind paywalls. Those cites and the plural ones seem good to me. Including the cites from behind the paywalls would be useful to those of us not blessed with such access. DCDuring TALK 20:36, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

 * RFV passed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 05:42, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:chromista


text:
Talk:Sudanian

RFV discussion: December 2016–April 2017
Rfv-sense : Is there even a "Sudanian language"? There are Sudanic languages (a family), Sudanese languages (languages of Sudan), and a language called Sundanese. But afaik no "Sudanian language" unless one is using a geographic reference rather than a linguistic one. Anyway, just wanted to check - TIA for any info.--A12n (talk) 00:38, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
 * An obsolete name for an obsolete concept. I have fixed the definition and cited it. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 05:31, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:Sudanian


text:
Talk:chowkat

RFV discussion: December 2016–April 2017
Any takers? Needs cleanup if OK. SemperBlotto (talk) 11:34, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

 * Appears to have been cited now by Kiwima. Equinox ● 16:49, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I am the person that created this page. (My IP address keeps changing, no idea why.) Is this page passed now since it has been cited ? 2.51.22.35 16:39, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
 * RFV passed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 05:46, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:chowkat


text:
Reconstruction talk:Proto-Finnic/okto

RFV discussion: December 2016–April 2017
This doesn't make much sense to me. The normal outcome of kt is ht in Finnish. Why would there be ts instead? —CodeCat 14:22, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
 * : : "An old hypercorrection for dialectal ohto, from Proto-Finnic *okto." --kc_kennylau (talk) 14:48, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
 * ht is the usual Eastern Finnish correspondent of written ts. Otso is only attested from written Finnish and (relatively late reports of) folk poetry, while ohto is additionally found in regular use in a variety of dialects, including some outside the area of *ts > ht; so the usual theory is hypercorrection, maybe somewhere around the 17-18th century.
 * There's even a very close parallel with having a variant  in the Tampere dialect and therearound (where tt is the colloquial equivalent of ts). --Tropylium (talk) 20:21, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
 * On closer checking, delete — it doesn't seem that there are grounds for a Proto-Finnic entry; there are no inherited descendants in other Finnic languages. I've added instead the better attested base word . --Tropylium (talk) 10:58, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

I did hear this word before, but I'd can't seem to recollect it. 86.99.15.2 11:01, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Deleted as an unsupported reconstruction. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 05:45, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

title: Reconstruction talk:Proto-Finnic/okto


text: gheronnen

title: gheronnen


text: ghestolen

title: ghestolen


text:
Talk:anti-Witness

RFV discussion: December 2016–April 2017
"An act of kindness that contradicts the Jehovah's Witnesses' negative presumptions about "worldly" people." Equinox ◑ 23:59, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

 * See typical usage at https://www.reddit.com/r/exjw/comments/5ird50/those_darn_worldly_people/

 * RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 05:19, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:anti-Witness


text:
Talk:intercourser

RFV discussion: December 2016–April 2017
Someone who has sexual intercourse. It's barely in Google Books, and not in this sense (there are other types of intercourse). Created by our nudism/incest obsessive I suspect. If it fails, also please remove link at Wikisaurus:copulator. Equinox ◑ 17:19, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

 * Surprisingly, there are sufficient cites for this (barely) Kiwima (talk) 18:00, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

 * RFV passed. I labelled both senses as rare. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 05:16, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:intercourser


text:
Talk:cherrypickin

RFV discussion: December 2016–April 2017
Can find no satisfactory usage examples with Google.

(Also, in case retained, it is defined as "Eye dialect spelling of cherrypicking", but in the recent discussion about the use or misuse of the term "eye dialect" in Wiktionary, was it established that this is or isn't "eye dialect"? Also it is listed as an adjective, but there is no adjective sense of "cherrypicking".) Mihia (talk) 17:55, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

 * I can only find one example as a single word:
 * which is not an adjective use anyway, but a simple present participle. I can find plenty examples of "cherry-pickin" and "cherry pickin", but again, clearly in the verb sense. Kiwima (talk) 18:19, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
 * which is not an adjective use anyway, but a simple present participle. I can find plenty examples of "cherry-pickin" and "cherry pickin", but again, clearly in the verb sense. Kiwima (talk) 18:19, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

 * cherrypickin' is actually a separate entry from cherrypickin. Mihia (talk) 20:10, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

 * Both with and without apostrophe RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 05:18, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:cherrypickin


text:
Talk:final frontier

RFV discussion: December 2016–April 2017
Possibly, but I only know it from Star Trek. SemperBlotto (talk) 13:14, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
 * There are plenty of quotes out there using "The final frontier" to refer to space, but there are also lots of quotes referring to other frontiers, such as mental illness, photographs of Pakistan, international regimes, parapsychology, etc. I think the problem here is not one for RFV, but for RFD - the phrase is SOP. Kiwima (talk) 17:44, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

 * 2016, Futurism, We Must Reach the Final Frontier: The Legacy of John Glenn
 * 2016, The Economist, "Exploring the final frontier" (dead-tree business magazine)
 * 2016, CNN, Discovering the 'final frontier' of our universe (TV news network)
 * 2016, NPR, New Satellite Provides Weather Forecasts For The Final Frontier (U.S. government public radio network)
 * 2016, New Scientist, Cosmic carve-up: Law and plunder on the final frontier (dead-tree science magazine)
 * 2016, Wharton School of Business, The Final Frontier: How Entrepreneurs Cracked the Aerospace Industry
 * 2016, National Review, Glenn, Aldrin, NASA . . . and Gingrich? "Men like the very-much-alive Aldrin and the late John Glenn risked their lives so that mankind could explore that final frontier." (dead-tree U.S. conservative right wing politics magazine)
 * 2016, Time, Astronauts Have Been Celebrating Thanksgiving in Space Since 1973. Here’s How "Celebrating American Thanksgiving on the Final Frontier has been a tradition of the United State’s space program for decades." (dead-tree news magazine)
 * 2016, The Times, Japanese give Branson a no-frills rival in space race "When Sir Richard Branson gets round to conquering his final frontier with the promise to boldly go where no man (or woman) has gone before on a passenger aircraft and pop into space, he may not be alone." (dead-tree newspaper)
 * 2016, Air Force Times, Need to know, 2016: Air Force Space Command on the final frontier (dead-tree U.S. military newspaper)
 * 2016, The Guardian, The Guardian view on space exploration: the final frontier (dead-tree newspaper)
 * 2014, CNBC, The final frontier: Universal space travel (TV business news network)
 * 2013, The Atlantic, Mars, Our First Outpost on the Final Frontier (dead-tree magazine)
 * 2012, The Telegraph, Voyager: to the Final Frontier, BBC Four, review (dead-tree newspaper)

-- 65.94.168.229 07:12, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

 * Delete as it is SoP. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:22, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
 * How is it an SoP, "outer space" doesn't fit the definitions of frontier -- 65.94.168.229 05:38, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
 * RFV passed, and added to RFD. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 05:13, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

RFD discussion: April–August 2017
Sense "outer space". Currently at WT:RFV (closed as passed) and soon to be archived to Talk:final frontier. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 05:14, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. Without previous knowledge of Star Trek, there's no guessing what people are referring to when they call outer space the "final frontier". —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 06:48, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

 * Keep. Could equally mean time, for time travel, but doesn't. Equinox ◑ 16:11, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Pur ple back pack 89  11:13, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
 * RFD kept per above consensus. --Dan Polansky (talk) 17:04, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. I know the definition through pop-cultural osmosis. 'Nuff said. W3ird N3rd (talk) 21:21, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:final frontier


text: gheleert

title: gheleert


text: gheloghen

title: gheloghen


text:
Talk:XPCOM

RFV discussion: December 2016–April 2017
User:Born2bgratis put a speedy tag on this today ("This is in NO way general lexicon"). Since it's a legitimate term, though, it seems to deserve a discussion. Equinox ◑ 05:17, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
 * “Legitimate”? I’d say not even Firefox users are aware of it. It is not a general computing term, and even Mozilla is phasing out the technology known by this acronym, so if you wanted to find “attestations” of it being used (as if it were a general term, not specific to Mozilla tecnical discussions), you’d have a harder time as time passes. ―Born2bgratis (talk) 16:35, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
 * The passage of time is irrelevant, as we include obsolete terms. This seems to be an RFV question rather than an RFD question. bd2412 T 18:38, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

 * Moved from RFD to RFV and retagged accordingly. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 00:27, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
 * As an RFV, this is not at all hard to find citations. Kiwima (talk) 17:04, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

 * RFV passed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 05:09, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:XPCOM


text:
Talk:balipholite

RFV discussion: December 2016–April 2017
Tagged in August by User:EI at10s but apparently never listed here. Equinox ◑ 21:19, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
 * The Chinese in the etymology seems dubious- "-pho-" could easily be formed in English. DTLHS (talk) 21:20, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

 * I've added 3 citations. Equinox ◑ 21:33, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I agree that it seems dubious. However, this is the official etymology from this analytical source: . I have tried researching what it may be but I found no results. MDBG did not help (which is my regular Chinese source), and -pho- definitely does not refer to phosphorus as it usually does in mineral names, as there is none in the mineral. EI at10s (talk) 18:01, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
 * There's (carpholite). DTLHS (talk) 18:24, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
 * You are likely very correct; the two minerals are very closely related so that may be the etymology source; at least, referring to the word carpholite rather than its etymology. But, there's no way of really confirming that. Should it be entered anyway? EI at10s (talk) 19:13, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
 * In the abstract of the original(?) paper ("The refinement of crystal structure of balipholite", 1987), they say "Balipholite has the simailar structure as that of the carpholite group but with large cations Ba occupying the caves of the structure." That seems like enough confirmation to me. DTLHS (talk) 02:33, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

 * RFV passed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 05:11, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:balipholite


text:
Talk:-holed solid torus

RFV discussion: December 2016–April 2017
So, er, why does it start with a hyphen? Equinox ◑ 05:04, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
 * That's so you can put the number of your choice in front of it. This really belongs at rfd, because it looks to me like holed and solid are independently modifying torus, somewhat like -legged terrestrial arthropod, and I have my doubts about whether the hyphen should be included in the entry name. Chuck Entz (talk) 05:16, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Should be deleted. The correct mathematical term, I believe, is or . SemperBlotto (talk) 05:59, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

 * Wrong venue, as these are RFD considerations, but deleted anyway. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 05:07, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:-holed solid torus


text: nøgda

title: nøgda


text: ghewan

title: ghewan


text:
Talk:bibliothecologia

RFV discussion: December 2016–April 2017
One use here. I very much doubt that the Spanish word was derived from this. DTLHS (talk) 00:13, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

 * The New Latin word bibliothecologia appears in the genitive inflected form in the M.Bibl. (Magister Bibliothecologiae) degree that has been granted in South Africa, which corresponds to the Master of Library Science. I am confident that you are correct that whereas New Latin bibliothecologia and Spanish bibliotecología are definitely cognate, they are both branches coming off of bibliotheca + -logia by themselves, rather than bibliotecología having come through bibliothecologia. I will correct have corrected the etymology at bibliotecología accordingly. Thanks, Quercus solaris (talk) 02:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

 * RFV failed. This seems to have been coined for the use of that one South African degree and is used nowhere else. Quercus solaris made several related entries, all of which were wrong in various ways; I have now fixed them. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 04:58, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:bibliothecologia


text:
Talk:kriĉji

RFV discussion: December 2016–April 2017
I have never seen this neologism before. Even its Wikipedia article on the Esperanto Wikipedia got removed many years ago, not sure why it is still here. 17:46, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I added one citation from Libera Folio. From what I am reading the first reference to it was in TEJO Tutmonde 2005 issue 2, which is durably archived; however I don't have a copy of this and thus cannot give the exact quote. Living in the United States I don't have much access to archives for Esperanto magazines, but I am hoping someone else can locate a copy. If not it's fine. Jan sewi (talk) 22:57, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

 * RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 05:01, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:kriĉji


text:
Talk:vaccicidal

RFV discussion: December 2016–April 2017
RFV of the English word, currently defined as: I've added the only citation I could find of it to Citations:vaccicidal; it suggests that there may be another one citeable in the works of Anthony Burgess. The corresponding noun,, has the necessary three citations, but those seem to be the only ones that exist. — I.S.M.E.T.A. 00:50, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Of or pertaining to vaccicide, the killing of cows, or that which kills cows.

 * There's one in This Man & Music (by Anthony Burgess). —Stephen (Talk) 14:32, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

 * That one isn't giving me a preview; would you mind adding the quotation? — I.S.M.E.T.A. 16:44, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Here's the bibliographical information, formatted per WT:": All that needs is the actual quotation. — I.S.M.E.T.A. 16:53, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
 * 1982,, This Man and Music, Applause Books (2001), ISBN 155783489X (10), ISBN 9781557834898 (13), page :

 * The quote is "I became expert in pretence, even to the use of vibrato, but I never learned to sound a note, stopped or open, that was not, as they say, vaccicidal." DTLHS (talk) 17:05, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

 * Thanks; added. Is there any context, bovine or otherwise, that might make sense of that strange sentence? — I.S.M.E.T.A. 18:41, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

 * He is talking about his inability to play the violin. I suppose he means his playing was bad enough to kill a cow, but why he chose cows for this comparison I don't know. DTLHS (talk) 18:47, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

 * OK. Thanks. — I.S.M.E.T.A. 21:32, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Citations:vaccicidal currently has two quotations, but only the 1982 quotation uses the term ; the 1987 quotation, which has “sayers of ‘vaccicidal’” twice, only mentions it. Whereas suggests that  would have a meaning like “pertaining to the killing of a cow”, the lack of a bovine context to the 1982 quotation shakes my confidence in such a defining by argumentum ad etymologiam. I don’t find any further attestation via Google Books, Google Groups, or Google Scholar. — I.S.M.E.T.A. 21:52, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The 1987 quote is almost certainly referring to the 1982 quote, so it's not independent, either. Chuck Entz (talk) 00:01, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Based on this book review, 's God : the most unpleasant character in all fiction (2016, OCLC 915507070) uses the word. — SMUconlaw (talk) 16:02, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

 * RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 04:44, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:vaccicidal


text: gheboden

title: gheboden


text:
Talk:4rum

RFV discussion: December 2016–April 2017
Rfv-sense: "(rare, Internet slang, leetspeak) Alternative spelling of from."

The Google results are mostly mirrors of the quote here. There are a few other results, but mostly they look like people who are just guessing at how English might work, and do not represent usage as such. - TheDaveRoss 21:20, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
 * RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 04:32, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:4rum


text:
Talk:pissaliere

RFV discussion: December 2016–April 2017
This entry was added a week ago, but it seems it was invented, with no real documentation. Can it be checked? [ ˌiˑvã̠n̪ˑ ˈs̪kr̺ud͡ʒʔ ˌn̺ovã̠n̪ˑˈt̪ɔ̟t̪ːo ] (parla con me) 18:06, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

 * I can only find this. Kiwima (talk) 19:16, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

 * Definitely a poor result, maybe even overlooked. I can't find anything, except pissaladière. [ ˌiˑvã̠n̪ˑ ˈs̪kr̺ud͡ʒʔ ˌn̺ovã̠n̪ˑˈt̪ɔ̟t̪ːo ] (parla con me) 20:34, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

 * Yes, the only Google hit for pissaliere is this “Monk's pissaliere” that is mirrored in various websites. I suggest the entry be deleted. [ ˌiˑvã̠n̪ˑ ˈs̪kr̺ud͡ʒʔ ˌn̺ovã̠n̪ˑˈt̪ɔ̟t̪ːo ] (parla con me) 11:40, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Seems most likely an error for . If so, delete unless it's a common error (which it doesn't appear to be, given the lack of Ghits). — SMUconlaw (talk) 09:39, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

 * RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 04:35, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:pissaliere


text:
Talk:神食

RFV discussion: December 2016–April 2017
does not convince me of this term's existence. Did anon seriously take the title of some obscure manga (whose cover tells you to pronounce it as, not ) as proof of this term? —suzukaze (t・c) 11:02, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
 * This IP certainly has been known to create entries from misinterpretations of random phrases in manga, but they've also been known to use Bing Translate. They're convinced that there has to be a Japanese term for everything, including obscure details of non-Asian mythologies that Japanese people rarely or never discuss anywhere a random person in the UK would have access to. Since they know next to nothing about the language, any method producing something vaguely like Japanese seems as good to them as the most meticulously-researched content that others might contribute. Chuck Entz (talk) 04:20, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

 * Oh dear, this fellow again? <sigh.../>
 * There are enough hits on Google to lead me to think this is a term -- that, and the kanji compound is reasonably straightforward, as + .  However, the reading the anon used is horribly wrong -- should be shinshoku if anything -- and this just means “god food, food of the gods”, not necessarily .  See also  (throwing in the は to focus on JA hits and exclude ZH ones).
 * For that matter, Eijiro has an entry for this and amusingly glosses the term as . Google hits suggest that this meaning, if used, is decidedly in the minority.
 * Rework or delete. ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 06:55, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

 * RFV failed. It seems like a pretty straightforward compound, but feel free to recreate it with a new def if "food of the Gods" would be an appropriate entry. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 04:43, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:神食


text:
Talk:unrebottleable

RFV discussion: December 2016–April 2017
This is a word that could be but it appears that it isn't. Google finds only one use, BGC nothing. This sole use is from Nov 10th 2012, 11:58 in this thread of discussion on the Economist's discussion page. Entire comment: "Unless smothered successfully, a major scandal involving hundreds of billions of dollars and the high-speed rail system is breaking, and it seems to have gathered some momentum in Hu's wrarninga about corruption and how it endangers the economy and government. The New Yorker carried an excellent bit of investigative journalism last week, as has the NYTimes and censor as you may, a lot of it is leaking out at the fringes. It starts to look like a an unrebottleable geni with potential to do a good bit of damage to stability." --Hekaheka (talk) 05:45, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Looks like a nonce word to me. (and he means ) SemperBlotto (talk) 07:43, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
 * But it tickles my fancy more than most. DCDuring TALK 16:20, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it should be made Word of the Day! Mihia (talk) 18:37, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

 * RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 04:40, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:unrebottleable


text: ghebeten

title: ghebeten


text:
Talk:metaphorical theism

RFV discussion: January–April 2017
Belief in God as a metaphor. (What does that mean, exactly?) Zilch in Google Books; no WP article; the main Google matches point to our entry. Equinox ◑ 05:44, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
 * RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 03:29, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:metaphorical theism


text:
Talk:baby boy

RFV discussion: December 2016–April 2017
"A man who is immature or infantile." (And if it's real, does it need a derogatory gloss?) Equinox ◑ 08:08, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

 * This one is a real challenge, because there are so many hits for the male infant or toddler, and then the term of endearment, but I did find the following:
 * I'm sure there are others, but there are so many false positives to wade through. Kiwima (talk) 19:10, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm sure there are others, but there are so many false positives to wade through. Kiwima (talk) 19:10, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm sure there are others, but there are so many false positives to wade through. Kiwima (talk) 19:10, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm sure there are others, but there are so many false positives to wade through. Kiwima (talk) 19:10, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

 * RFV passed. I added a context label as Eq. suggested. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 04:38, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:baby boy


text:
Talk:exilarch

RFV discussion: January–April 2017
"The head of a community of Jews in the diaspora." This was originally entered as "The term applied by Greeks to the head of a community of Jews in the diaspora"; so the question is whether it can be found in English rather than in Greek. Equinox ◑ 15:23, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * It seems very unlikely to be an Ancient Greek word since exile is a Latin word. According to, the Ancient Greek word was . As for the English word, the Wikipedia article has many references, including some that use the word in their title, so it seems to be real. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 16:43, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Google scholar has a number of hits for the term, as does google books. I agree it is unlikely to be Greek, but it is clearly a word, most often, but not always, capitalized. Kiwima (talk) 18:55, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

 * Clearly citeable, and thus RFV passed, but better wording of the senses and addition of quotations would still be helpful. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 04:30, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:exilarch


text: ghescreven

title: ghescreven


text:
Talk:xenão

RFV discussion: January–April 2017
There is only one use of this sense in Google Books and Google Scholar. — Ungoliant (falai) 22:43, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
 * RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 00:44, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:xenão


text:
Talk:conspection

RFV discussion: January–April 2017
I can't see this word anywhere on the internet but I don't know if it exists or not. The user has used some quotes but I am doubtful whether this word exists or not. Pkbwcgs (talk) 18:11, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

 * I have added a large number of cites (and there are more). The word also appears in some other dictionaries. Kiwima (talk) 19:01, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

 * RFV passed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 00:37, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:conspection


text:
Talk:sociocosmic

RFV discussion: January–April 2017
Has a couple of mentions, but I'm not sure if this is a protologism or a neologism. --Robbie SWE (talk) 18:44, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

 * I have added quite a few cites, as well as cleaned up the entry. Kiwima (talk) 19:27, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

 * Thanks ! --Robbie SWE (talk) 21:39, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

 * RFV passed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 00:38, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:sociocosmic


text:
Talk:レイヴン

RFV discussion: January–April 2017
See. —suzukaze (t・c) 11:47, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

 * This exists as a proper noun – it's the title of a video game, and the name of a few fictional characters – but I can't find it attested as a common noun. Arguably, the proper noun is a transliteration of or the like. I've never seen it used to mean . Cnilep (talk) 06:38, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

 * Noun sense RFV failed and converted to a proper noun entry per Cnilep. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 00:42, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:レイヴン


text: ghecropen

title: ghecropen


text: ghemaect

title: ghemaect


text:
Talk:lifeless

RFV discussion: March–April 2017
"departed" - in what sense? I can only imagine this being a euphemism for "dead", but we already have another sense for that. Equinox ◑ 23:07, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Added in June 2005 by HiFlyer . Probably intended as a synonym for dead as you say, or maybe as meaning "unconscious". Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk) 13:47, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

 * RFV failed; no sense with a distinct meaning appears to exist. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 23:34, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:lifeless


text: oppnått

title: oppnått


text:
momentet

Etymology
From.

title: momentet


text:
Module:User:Justinrleung/char-summary

--Based on Module:User:Wyang/char-summary local export = {}

local match = mw.ustring.match

local char_list = "的一是不了人我在有他這中大來上國個到說們為子和你地出道也時年得就那要下以生會自著去之過家學對可她里后小麼心多天而能好都然沒日于起還發成事只作當想看文無開手十用主行方又如前所本見經頭面公同三已老從動兩長知民樣現分將外但身些與高意進把法此實回二理美點月明其種聲全工己話兒者向情部正名定女問力機給等几很業最間新甚打便位因重被走電四第門相次東政海口使教西再平真聽世氣信北少關并內加化由卻代軍產入先山五太水萬市眼體別處總纔場師書比住員九笑性通目華報立馬命張活難神數件安表原車白應路期叫死常提感金何更反合放做系計或司利受光王果親界及今京務制解各任至清物台象記邊共風戰干接它許八特覺望直服毛林題建南度統色字請交愛讓認算論佰吃義科怎元社術結六功指思非流每青管夫連遠資隊跟帶花快條院變聯言權往展該領傳近留紅治決周保達辦運武半候七必城父強步完革深區即求品士轉量空甚眾技輕程告江語英基派滿式李息寫呢識極令黃德收臉錢黨倒未持取設始版雙历越史商仟片容研像找友孩站廣改議形委早房音火際則首單據導影失拿網香似斯專石若兵弟誰校讀志飛觀爭究包組造落視濟喜離雖坐集編寶談府拉黑且隨格尽劍講布殺微怕母調局根曾准團段終樂切級克精哪官示冲竟乎男舉客證苦照注費足爾招群熱推晚響稱興待約陽哥驚嗎整支古漢突號絕選吧參刊亞复傷類備歡另港勢刻星斷陳掌農夜般唸价腦規底故省媽剛句顯消衣陸器確破具居批送澤緊幫線存願奇害增楊料州節左裝易著急久低歲需酒河初游嚴鐵族除份敢胡血企仍投聞斗紀腳右蘇標飯云病醫阿答土況境軟考娘村刀擊僅查引朝育續獨羅買戶護喝朋供責項背余希衛列圖室亂劉爺龍咱章席錯兄暗創排春须承案忙呼樹痛沉啊靈職鄉細訴態停印筆夏助福塊冷球姑划既質巴致灣演木韋怪圍靜旁園否副輯采食登夠賽米假較姐樓获孫宣穿詩歌速忽堂敵試謝央懷顧驗營止姓養麗屬景郭依威按惡慢座罪維漸勝藏皇街激異摘角瞧負施模草某銀露陣值班層修差味織藥館密亮律習田簡免毒歸波型屋換救寄帝退洋絲湖睡勞婦伯尼皮祖雄婚康評追哈絡店翻環禮跑超叶壓占均永烈獎婆趕富蘭錄畫遇頓藝普判源億素船繼尚嘴察雨優您險烟階擔散板钟訪妹伸佛限討臨吳搖跳曲練構玩玉犯廠肯協幸揮效齊封溫疑肉攻紙策充頂尋寧沙防抓例股賣順警夢劇善蒙票良范堅端靠雜貴怒稿拍率舊掉啦莫授守油恩積益縣哭罷庭窗揚忘午卡雪菜牌牛脫博丈彈洲松坏鄧鮮短畢置楚歐略智島抗妻抱載敗槍適虛預睛刺爹紛介括銷降魚奔忍宗盤耳野訊配禁索趙默徒架燈峰狀款移爸托洪升伙訂毫狐鎮床互套旅逃罵輸唱靖秘詞困淚熟財鬼骨申欲征私舞秋巨迎秀搞丁吸審遍牆朱聖避躍忌桌執悲域曉弄亡橋輩閃隱勁鬧恐呀付敬監廳庫震材冰醒慶綠腿述徐尊硬額誤借納折售遺暴缺迷魯探貨童緩偉君莊凡危燒彩搶控胸戲篇趣束謂概射課洞麻杯透郵榮懂擁獻洗休迫嘆狗偷陰汽拜橫鼓健厚簽丹洛喊蓉輪岸奶淡潮訓圓卷釋諸妙唯奪逐燕呆測浪抽蓋偏閱購途縱耶摸掛航擇恨舍拳竹唐譽乘弱檢宮儀旗含袁址擺奧番混滅握牙慮召猛寬盛核袋紹補典圈丰雅吉贊茶亦谷穩匯厲屆跡雷序寒附雞遭挑肩憶柔戴惜隔豪誠瑞減播麼針棋競臂挺操腰狂替梅固倫宋鋼諾殘延虎迅災悄岳喬川仇季吹糧聚譯珠叔謀礎仁損融輛凈敏伊仙巧零累享伴蕩珍勇末奮膽棄煩糊猶稅培抵僧鋒乃遙摩坦後眉餐慣憑冠抬碰幣啟碼冒汗俗灰督窮頗傾尖韓貿仿孤飄漫予紫側沿拔袖梁賞幕壁旦晨純閉涼掃尤炮碗貼插滾緣寺貝潤氏冬擴欄荒哲逼嚇堆撞郎倆藍閑辛鏡陪騎蛋促羊宜嘛顏貧幅駐萍污傑撲壯薩刑憂貌獄塞鳳孔觸戀豈森繁碎津俠隆遲輝狠析縮穴蕭怨磨伏辭泥齡徑鼻賴仰憤慕俄映詢慘麥宿倍粗騰稍截染烏愈崗柳鋪涉疾擋奉踏忠伍躲籍努朗箱裁帳兼彼霞豬悉扎勸薄築俊鞋距侵欣擠媒吐魂潔枝盈阻陷甲鄭鳴倘剩顆拖舒惠昏振戒喪焦爬凌慧偶晃桃赤爛騙措頁凶泰屍坡勒療塔塵躺殊慰坛甘咬拒彪炸井崇飲祝汪牢桂尾漂聊撒恰凝矛於賓緒彭肚匆描粉賊乏盾愁斜裂滑斐廢寂涌詳湯徹玄斤轟奸憐朵佳皆鳥邦扶毀聰辯瓶餓蛇捕搬沈楓舅幽魔琴掙聘彎墓欺悟蔣臣返違虧丟援赫魏耐佩酸盟胖傻繞哼秦屈辱昨瘦暫箭署赴遞猜潛鴻績耀塗割豆悶亭祥勵宇泛狼悔搭艦浮牽符肅奴爆姊幼夾邀瘋允惱租椅尺侍腐顫扭菲瓦擦辣奏殷埋摔盼吟渡衫跨醉艱掩荷蒼旋揭桑仗蓮鑽宏幻刃峽遼娃凱患障丐衡貓丑濤暖溜鍋奈罰拾濃鍵脈鎖鄰臭芳垂捉恢姆砍駕恭挨禍曹慈抖泉覽澳脏疼銅羞檔拋苗惑肥驅窩褲估胞柄闊杜勤舟帽瑪撤頻禪柯萊堪寸哀熊腹嘗敲勃巡盜籌扣池淺柴埃嫁枚稀雕厭瓜壽跌扯董錦鑒刷趨捐傲貫殿撥遜踢賠姿遷黎祭滴襲慌鞭茫逢屠昆柏駛咐植懼紐捷圳牲蹤叢漠銳喇乾霍濕睜仔吵悠溝墨串俱陶貢渾贏屁馳棒匹拼恆邪脆糟扮賢飾償拆纏攝擬滋嘿旨闖賀翠縫飽劫撫挖冊叛肖熙煉憲廟碧盒誼儲馮喚貪臥翼擾脅跪碑呵甜洒譜莎娜閣庸鵬覆玲侯抹盧礙綜丘暈攔燃昌吞嫌狄押舌琳霧曼恥柜攤削戚杆岩喂扔逝誕懸爽崔廷湊痴盆御酷艾唉姥籠顛姻攜愧芬穆扇郁擲怔芯鼠糾疆曰傅袍唇穌捧勾牧儒慨筋柱卑咽噸蟲繩廚冤漲皺疲賭饒礦暢煤腕噴遣浩翁咨鏢屏仲嘻吩棉孟撐爐泄葬搜添遵迪偽兆欠諒炎氛杖瞎釣腸披剝誓賺役泡逆矮吊填嘉燭廈夕衰液薛仆邁齒謹呈昂抄彌渴梯疏耗瞪斥誇蒂剪娶痕弗姚債妥璃掏剎晶衷膚鹿拓卓癥糖欽綿哩誘枯歇塑妨豫抑珊棍晉淋悅敦艷玻砸嚷盲辨葛罕矩泳宅貸膀捏頸踐脖賈轎脾堡嬌浙劣瀟賜陀蓄墳頌漏杭茅磚瞬鶴辟漁乖霸襄炒啞浦餅犧灘釘吁錫贈哄鈴頑殖鷹蔡催芙彬拚軌喲歉盯碩惹契愚帥惶憾懶姨喘獸陌罩獵嵩鹽飢凄喉宴腔翰膝陵蜂邏劈廉裹驕販繪崖辰涯戈坑遮擒蠻芷堵雇挽眠吻孝泊撕虹敘粹勉竭歪慎棵朴械溪莉斑磕寡循斬掠呂昔郊爵徽磁俯譚鼎拂俺嫂帕嗯凍婉桐駱潑匠艇謙妓菩廁俘毅嶺丫畏湘桶嗓煌鮑粒巷帘禿腊倉拐綁啥薦倪瑟廊鴨蜜診棚掀筒媳紋秒沾龐蹲騷歧艘芝嘩畝券趟巾淫謊寞灌籃妄擱侄廂叉俞伐宰瞞宙腫漆怖吾吼僑疊嘯罐肆裙泣脹賦熬趁咳愉懇辜肌嬰羽躬斃拘叮哇晴謎淮旺逸瓊姜嗚竄頒薪寨尿頰逮卜昭浸刮宛囑囊寓駁倡浴咕挪搏蓬晌渠兜喃夷滬賤魄舵晰僵糕裔秩倚塌恍鉤嘲傍裕煮乳勿豎懲睹株繡妖訝咖綱胎濱耕嗤艙娛匪鴉胃躁獅砰妮凜龜裸嫣甫窯塘纖寵鏈拱尹掘壩狹銘淳沐馨潘甩榜淵羡侮卿兀喧履猴枉襯畔凳緬弦畜粞溢摟乞旬縛燦輿雁倦酬韻媚堤攀竊嫩遂澄偵陝陋笨匙沫聳踩醬壺啡碌癢鄙殼貞霉蠢蘆胳矣焰脊囚輔賬佐僚雀撰耍枕撿涵逗糞朦肝蒸濫筷潰隸烤缸弓潭曠哎峻爪怯茂芒肢稻兔圾喻框繳蹈哨穎菊喀妝淹瓷淀蠟嚼劑逛驟暑襟廬蘋曬悼昧攏函朧膠抒乒諷歹旱葡惟揀耿廿樁乙謠墜滯孕誦梳岡肺丸霜汁紗銜膩甸啤坎稼禾愣脂萄撈攪屑傘蝶鑄軀稚腥藤陡燙梨哦漿僻坊焉隙淘垮滔釀鵝茲搗棟瑰敞癌纜爍玫詐煞膜焚粘摧疫幢汝毯挫紡朽錘兌辮墮笛覓蔽諧氓蔑沸藉卸熄扁炭慷篷眨譬叨蔬綢婿寥澆乓膏膛琢啪淑叭弊灶醋斌奠屯膨淪縷壤冶暇揉蘿翔蛛栗蔭譏蔥鞏粥齋迄幟菌鉛賄絨侶鍛譴洶敷宵諱鑼撼亨淌扛杉燥勻渺碟嵌沃剖姬綽嗦絞軸壘噪蘊邵咋坪傭卵晝憋奎捂煎瞅蝕熔蝦謬紳鑲聾募壟彥翹趴杏彰闡訟樞嶄蒲瀉儉橡溶瀑扒琛"

function export.main(frame) local result = { "Summary of entries for the most common Chinese characters. See Module:User:Justinrleung/char-summary.", "\n{| class=\"wikitable sortable\" style=\"text-align:center; font-size:120%\"", "\n|-\n!n!!Character!!Han etym!!Oracle bone!!Bronze!!Bamboo and silk!!Big seal!!Small seal!!Mandarin!!Sichuanese!!Cantonese!!Taishanese!!Gan!!Sixian!!Meixian!!Jin!!Min Bei!!Min Dong!!Hokkien!!Teochew!!Leizhou!!Wu!!Xiang" }	local tick, cross = "✓ ", "✘ " local i = 0 for cp in mw.ustring.gcodepoint(char_list, 1, 100) do		local found = false i = i + 1 local char_info = {} local ch = mw.ustring.char(cp) local content = mw.title.new(ch):getContent local sections = mw.text.split(content, '%-%-%-%-') for _, section in ipairs(sections) do			if match(section, "==Chinese==") then found = true table.insert(char_info, match(section, "") and tick or cross) table.insert(char_info, "") table.insert(char_info, "") table.insert(char_info, "") table.insert(char_info, "") table.insert(char_info, "") table.insert(char_info, match(section, "|m=[^%s|]") and tick or cross) table.insert(char_info, match(section, "|m%-s=[^%s|]") and tick or cross) table.insert(char_info, match(section, "|c=[^%s|]") and tick or cross) table.insert(char_info, match(section, "|c%-t=[^%s|]") and tick or cross) table.insert(char_info, match(section, "|g=[^%s|]") and tick or cross) table.insert(char_info, match(section, "pfs=[^%s|]") and tick or cross) table.insert(char_info, match(section, "gd=[^%s|]") and tick or cross) table.insert(char_info, match(section, "|j=[^%s|]") and tick or cross) table.insert(char_info, match(section, "|mb=[^%s|]") and tick or cross) table.insert(char_info, match(section, "|md=[^%s|]") and tick or cross) table.insert(char_info, match(section, "|mn=[^%s|]") and tick or cross) table.insert(char_info, match(section, "|mn%-t=[^%s|]") and tick or cross) table.insert(char_info, match(section, "|mn%-l=[^%s|]") and tick or cross) table.insert(char_info, match(section, "|w=[^%s|]") and tick or cross) table.insert(char_info, match(section, "|x=[^%s|]") and tick or cross) break end end table.insert(result, "\n|-\n!"..i.."\n!"..ch.."\n|"..			(found and table.concat(char_info, "\n|") or "colspan=8|Chinese section not found")) end return table.concat(result, "") end

return export

title: Module:User:Justinrleung/char-summary


text:
naaltsoos ahiʼnííł

Etymology
+

Noun

 * 1) election, balloting

title: naaltsoos ahiʼnííł


text: User:Justinrleung/char-summary

title: User:Justinrleung/char-summary


text:
Pepin County

Etymology
Named after Pierre and Jean Pepin du Chardonnets.

title: Pepin County


text:
aktualizáció

Etymology
Borrowed from. With Latinate ending.

title: aktualizáció


text:
अनुनासिकता

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) nasalization

title: अनुनासिकता


text:
उभय

Etymology
, from, see also 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Determiner

 * 1) both, two; both of

Etymology
From, see also 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Adjective

 * 1) in both ways, of two sides

title: उभय


text:
Pepin

Proper noun

 * , possibly from French Pépin.

title: Pepin


text:
käpä

Noun

 * 1)  chin

title: käpä


text:
User talk:Deletedarticle

Welcome!

Hello, welcome to Wiktionary, and thank you for your contributions so far.

If you are unfamiliar with wiki editing, take a look at Help:How to edit a page. It is a concise list of technical guidelines to the wiki format we use here: how to, for example, make text boldfaced or create hyperlinks. Feel free to practice in the sandbox. If you would like a slower introduction we have a short tutorial.

These links may help you familiarize yourself with Wiktionary:

 * Entry layout (EL) is a detailed policy documenting how Wiktionary pages should be formatted. All entries should conform to this standard. The easiest way to start off is to copy the contents of an existing page for a similar word, and then adapt it to fit the entry you are creating.
 * Our Criteria for inclusion (CFI) define exactly which words can be added to Wiktionary, though it may be a bit technical and longwinded. The most important part is that Wiktionary only accepts words that have been in somewhat widespread use over the course of at least a year, and citations that demonstrate usage can be asked for when there is doubt.
 * If you already have some experience with editing our sister project Wikipedia, then you may find our guide for Wikipedia users useful.
 * The FAQ aims to answer most of your remaining questions, and there are several help pages that you can browse for more information.
 * A glossary of our technical jargon, and some hints for dealing with the more common communication issues.
 * If you have anything to ask about or suggest, we have several discussion rooms. Feel free to ask any other editors in person if you have any problems or question, by posting a message on their talk page.

You are encouraged to add a BabelBox to your userpage. This shows which languages you know, so other editors know which languages you'll be working on, and what they can ask you for help with.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wiktionarian! If you have any questions, bring them to the Information desk, or ask me on my talk page. If you do so, please sign your posts with four tildes: ~ which automatically produces your username and the current date and time.

Again, welcome! —Aryamanarora (मुझसे बात करो) 21:19, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

RFC discussion: March 2017
The IP doesn't geolocate to Indonesia, but everything else points to blocked Indonesian editor Willy2000. They've been adding translations and creating entries in an implausibly broad assortment of European and Southeast Asian languages, with many of the European entries lacking basic information such as gender that a fluent speaker would presumably know. I speedied a Russian entry that had no Google Books hits, but there's enough evidence for some of the others that I don't want to risk meddling in languages I don't know without more to go on than a hunch. Chuck Entz (talk) 20:47, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Definitely Willy. I think we can trust that the Indonesian-Malay ones are fine and mark those as patrolled, but the rest is questionable., there's a lot of Slavic ones — could you please check and fix the Russian and Ukrainian ones, and any others that you can check as well? Thank you! —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 20:59, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I think we can also add Special:Contributions/Anth2943 to this. The overlap in timing of edits can be explained by assuming they were using two browsers at the same time, but logged in on only one. Chuck Entz (talk) 02:33, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
 * ... and Special:Contributions/79.186.132.206 Chuck Entz (talk) 02:58, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

 * The Slavic contributions are very basic and primitive, lacking many important parts (word stress, gender, verb aspect, inflections, let alone pronunciations and etymologies) but they seem correct. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 09:15, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

hello
hello friend, how are you? please contact me via email asap

title: User talk:Deletedarticle


text: 维他命K

title: 维他命K


text: kjes

title: kjes


text:
विटामिन ई

Noun

 * 1) vitamin E

title: विटामिन ई


text: Category:hi:Vitamins

title: Category:hi:Vitamins


text:
विटामिन

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) vitamin

title: विटामिन


text:
विटामिन सी

Noun

 * 1) vitamin C

title: विटामिन सी


text:
विटामिन डी

Noun

 * 1) vitamin D

title: विटामिन डी


text:
विटामिन बी१२

Noun

 * 1) vitamin B12

title: विटामिन बी१२


text:
Reconstruction:Proto-Semitic/bint-

Etymology
From, the unstressed vowel of which is lost through syncopation.

Noun

 * 1) daughter

Descendants

 * East Semitic:
 * West Semitic:
 * Central Semitic:
 * Northwest Semitic:
 * Canaanite:
 * Old South Arabian:
 * Canaanite:
 * Old South Arabian:
 * Old South Arabian:
 * Old South Arabian:

title: Reconstruction:Proto-Semitic/bint-


text:
இந்தியர்

Noun

 * 1) an inhabitant of India

title: இந்தியர்


text:
இயேசு

Etymology
From, from.

Proper noun

 * 1) Jesus Christ

title: இயேசு


text:
యేసు

Proper noun

 * 1)  Jesus

title: యేసు


text:
Blandford Forum

Etymology
+ . The addition of dates to the 18th century.

title: Blandford Forum


text:
nøktern

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) calm, steady, down-to-earth
 * 2) dispassionate, objective, factual, restrained
 * 3) moderate, careful, frugal
 * 4)  sober
 * 1) moderate, careful, frugal
 * 2)  sober
 * 1)  sober

title: nøktern


text: Yetminster

title: Yetminster


text:
yiyiiłtáás

Etymology
.

Verb

 * 1) he/she is bending it

Conjugation
.

Verbal stems

 * FUTURE: -tas
 * OPTATIVE: -táás

title: yiyiiłtáás


text:
guwiirr

Adjective

 * 1) sweet

Noun

 * 1) manna on gum leaves
 * 2) sweet heart
 * 3) malee willow (pittosporum phylliraeoides)

title: guwiirr


text:
Perea

Proper noun

 * 1)  A portion of biblical king Herod's kingdom, on the eastern side of the Jordan River valley, from about one third the way down from the Sea of Galilee to about one third the way down the eastern shore of the Dead Sea.
 * 2) * 2002, Kenneth L. Barker (general editor), Zondervan NIV Study Bible, Zondervan, ISBN 978-0-310-93896-5, note on Luke 3:1:
 * At the death of Herod the Great (4 ), his sons — Archelaus, Herod Antipas, and Herod Philip — were given jurisdiction over his divided kingdom. Herod Antipas became the tetrarch of Galilee and Perea.

title: Perea


text: Maiden Newton

title: Maiden Newton


text:
vellard

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  A causeway.

title: vellard


text: vellards

title: vellards


text: Shillingstone

title: Shillingstone