text:
Abdirahman

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Abdirahman is the 29171st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 812 individuals. Abdirahman is most common among Black/African American (97.17%) individuals.

title: Abdirahman


text: Abdirahmans

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Abdirahmans


text:
Bonavita

Etymology
Borrowed from.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Bonavita is the 29171st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 812 individuals. Bonavita is most common among White (96.55%) individuals.

Etymology
From.

title: Bonavita


text: Bonavitas

title: Bonavitas


text:
Silcott

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Silcott is the 29171st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 812 individuals. Silcott is most common among White (72.54%) and Black/African American (19.46%) individuals.

title: Silcott


text: Silcotts

title: Silcotts


text:
Sodhi

Etymology
Borrowed from.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Sodhi is the 29171st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 812 individuals. Sodhi is most common among Asian/Pacific Islander (90.64%) individuals.

title: Sodhi


text: Sodhis

title: Sodhis


text:
Marling

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Marling is the 29171st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 812 individuals. Marling is most common among White (94.58%) individuals.

title: Marling


text: Marlings

title: Marlings


text:
Mottley

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Mottley is the 29171st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 812 individuals. Mottley is most common among Black/African American (55.42%) and White (36.45%) individuals.

title: Mottley


text: Mottleys

title: Mottleys


text:
Piorkowski

Etymology
Borrowed from.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Piorkowski is the 29171st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 812 individuals. Piorkowski is most common among White (94.09%) individuals.

Etymology
.

Etymology
Borrowed from.

title: Piorkowski


text: Piorkowskis

title: Piorkowskis


text:
Hiland

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Hiland is the 29171st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 812 individuals. Hiland is most common among White (91.87%) individuals.

title: Hiland


text: Hilands

title: Hilands


text:
Huq

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Huq is the 29171st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 812 individuals. Huq is most common among Asian/Pacific Islander (90.52%) individuals.

title: Huq


text: Huqs

title: Huqs


text:
Hudon

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Hudon is the 29171st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 812 individuals. Hudon is most common among White (94.33%) individuals.

title: Hudon


text: Hudons

title: Hudons


text:
Giuffrida

Etymology
Borrowed from.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Giuffrida is the 29171st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 812 individuals. Giuffrida is most common among White (94.09%) individuals.

title: Giuffrida


text: Giuffridas

title: Giuffridas


text:
Chhun

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Chhun is the 29171st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 812 individuals. Chhun is most common among Asian/Pacific Islander (94.58%) individuals.

title: Chhun


text: Chhuns

title: Chhuns


text:
Carra

Etymology
As an surname, from  (probably related to 🇨🇬). As a surname, from.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Carra is the 29171st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 812 individuals. Carra is most common among White (75.37%) and Hispanic/Latino (20.44%) individuals.

title: Carra


text: Carras

title: Carras


text:
Brocker

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Brocker is the 29171st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 812 individuals. Brocker is most common among White (91.38%) individuals.

title: Brocker


text: Brockers

title: Brockers


text:
Burmester

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Burmester is the 29171st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 812 individuals. Burmester is most common among White (95.07%) individuals.

title: Burmester


text: Burmesters

title: Burmesters


text:
Kałużny

Etymology
From.

title: Kałużny


text:
Cryan

Etymology
Reduced Anglicized form of, a personal name derived from a diminutive of.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Cryan is the 29171st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 812 individuals. Cryan is most common among White (94.09%) individuals.

title: Cryan


text: Cryans

title: Cryans


text:
Cragun

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Cragun is the 29171st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 812 individuals. Cragun is most common among White (96.18%) individuals.

title: Cragun


text: Craguns

title: Craguns


text:
Dalbec

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Dalbec is the 29171st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 812 individuals. Dalbec is most common among White (93.35%) individuals.

title: Dalbec


text: Dalbecs

title: Dalbecs


text:
Crosser

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Crosser is the 29198th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 811 individuals. Crosser is most common among White (94.7%) individuals.

title: Crosser


text: Crossers

title: Crossers


text:
Crossno

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Crossno is the 29198th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 811 individuals. Crossno is most common among White (91.62%) individuals.

title: Crossno


text: Crossnos

title: Crossnos


text:
Dushane

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Dushane is the 29198th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 811 individuals. Dushane is most common among White (89.15%) individuals.

title: Dushane


text: Dushanes

title: Dushanes


text:
Goon

Etymology 1
Perhaps a shortened form of.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Goon is the 29198th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 811 individuals. Goon is most common among Asian/Pacific Islander (51.17%) and White (38.72%) individuals.

Noun

 * 1)  A wooden ladle for milk

title: Goon


text: Goons

title: Goons


text:
Galland

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Galland is the 29198th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 811 individuals. Galland is most common among White (93.46%) individuals.

title: Galland


text: Gallands

title: Gallands


text:
Galletta

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Galletta is the 29198th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 811 individuals. Galletta is most common among White (92.85%) individuals.

title: Galletta


text: Gallettas

title: Gallettas


text:
Petruska

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Petruska is the 29198th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 811 individuals. Petruska is most common among White (93.71%) individuals.

title: Petruska


text: Petruskas

title: Petruskas


text:
Piercey

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Piercey is the 29198th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 811 individuals. Piercey is most common among White (94.94%) individuals.

title: Piercey


text: Pierceys

title: Pierceys


text:
Prothero

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Prothero is the 29198th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 811 individuals. Prothero is most common among White (91.86%) individuals.

title: Prothero


text: Protheros

title: Protheros


text:
Larusso

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Larusso is the 29198th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 811 individuals. Larusso is most common among White (94.94%) individuals.

title: Larusso


text: Larussos

title: Larussos


text:
Kerkhoff

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Kerkhoff is the 29198th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 811 individuals. Kerkhoff is most common among White (92.73%) individuals.

Etymology
From. Compare 🇨🇬 and 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1)  churchyard, graveyard
 * 2)  cemetery

title: Kerkhoff


text: Kerkhoffs

title: Kerkhoffs


text:
Killmer

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Killmer is the 29198th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 811 individuals. Killmer is most common among White (94.2%) individuals.

title: Killmer


text: Killmers

title: Killmers


text:
Markwardt

Etymology
North surname, from  +.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Markwardt is the 29198th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 811 individuals. Markwardt is most common among White (96.67%) individuals.

title: Markwardt


text: Markwardts

title: Markwardts


text:
Stradling

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Stradling is the 29198th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 811 individuals. Stradling is most common among White (96.42%) individuals.

title: Stradling


text: Stradlings

title: Stradlings


text:
Ciepły

Etymology
From.

title: Ciepły


text:
Temme

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Temme is the 29198th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 811 individuals. Temme is most common among White (96.79%) individuals.

title: Temme


text: Temmes

title: Temmes


text:
Boberg

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Boberg is the 29198th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 811 individuals. Boberg is most common among White (95.68%) individuals.

title: Boberg


text: Bobergs

title: Bobergs


text:
Bognar

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Bognar is the 29198th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 811 individuals. Bognar is most common among White (93.59%) individuals.

title: Bognar


text: Bognars

title: Bognars


text:
Zamor

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Zamor is the 29198th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 811 individuals. Zamor is most common among Black/African American (85.7%) individuals.

title: Zamor


text: Zamors

title: Zamors


text:
Wayt

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Wayt is the 29198th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 811 individuals. Wayt is most common among White (93.09%) individuals.

title: Wayt


text:
נץ

Noun

 * 1) hawk bird
 * 2) blossom

title: נץ


text: Wayts

title: Wayts


text:
Yaple

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Yaple is the 29198th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 811 individuals. Yaple is most common among White (95.81%) individuals.

title: Yaple


text: Yaples

title: Yaples


text:
Wollam

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Wollam is the 29198th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 811 individuals. Wollam is most common among White (92.23%) individuals.

title: Wollam


text: Wollams

title: Wollams


text:
Tłusty

Etymology
From.

title: Tłusty


text:
Vink

Etymology
Borrowed from.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Vink is the 29198th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 811 individuals. Vink is most common among White (94.33%) individuals.

Etymology

 * (hamlet)
 * (neighbourhood) See also 🇨🇬.

The surname derives from one of the toponyms or from one of the senses of.

title: Vink


text: Vinks

title: Vinks


text:
Vanwagenen

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Vanwagenen is the 29231st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 810 individuals. Vanwagenen is most common among White (94.69%) individuals.

title: Vanwagenen


text: Vanwagenens

title: Vanwagenens


text:
Urquilla

Etymology
Borrowed from, itself of origin.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Urquilla is the 29231st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 810 individuals. Urquilla is most common among Hispanic/Latino (95.68%) individuals.

title: Urquilla


text: Urquillas

title: Urquillas


text:
Bartko

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Bartko is the 29231st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 810 individuals. Bartko is most common among White (96.79%) individuals.

title: Bartko


text: Bartkos

title: Bartkos


text:
Bouwman

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Bouwman is the 29231st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 810 individuals. Bouwman is most common among White (96.17%) individuals.

title: Bouwman


text: Bouwmans

title: Bouwmans


text:
Kościelny

Etymology
From.

title: Kościelny


text:
Stitzel

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Stitzel is the 29231st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 810 individuals. Stitzel is most common among White (93.09%) individuals.

title: Stitzel


text: Stitzels

title: Stitzels


text:
Stooksbury

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Stooksbury is the 29231st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 810 individuals. Stooksbury is most common among White (96.79%) individuals.

title: Stooksbury


text: Stooksburys

title: Stooksburys


text: grevilias

title: grevilias


text:
Slinker

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Slinker is the 29231st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 810 individuals. Slinker is most common among White (94.32%) individuals.

title: Slinker


text: Slinkers

title: Slinkers


text:
Shreeve

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Shreeve is the 29231st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 810 individuals. Shreeve is most common among White (93.95%) individuals.

title: Shreeve


text: Shreeves

title: Shreeves


text:
ἅλις

Adverb

 * 1) in crowds
 * 2) in plenty
 * 3) enough

title: ἅλις


text:
Rigler

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Rigler is the 29231st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 810 individuals. Rigler is most common among White (96.17%) individuals.

title: Rigler


text: Riglers

title: Riglers


text:
Rieser

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Rieser is the 29231st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 810 individuals. Rieser is most common among White (96.17%) individuals.

title: Rieser


text: Riesers

title: Riesers


text:
Ketcher

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Ketcher is the 29231st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 810 individuals. Ketcher is most common among White (56.17%) and null (33.09%) individuals.

title: Ketcher


text: Ketchers

title: Ketchers


text:
Joynt

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Joynt is the 29231st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 810 individuals. Joynt is most common among White (96.42%) individuals.

title: Joynt


text: Joynts

title: Joynts


text:
Noteboom

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Noteboom is the 29231st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 810 individuals. Noteboom is most common among White (95.68%) individuals.

title: Noteboom


text: Notebooms

title: Notebooms


text:
Gatchalian

Etymology
Filipino surname, from Gatchalian, Hispanicized form of Gat Sa Li-han, title of a legendary ruler of Ma-i (an ancient precolonial state in the Philippines)

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Gatchalian is the 29231st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 810 individuals. Gatchalian is most common among Asian/Pacific Islander (92.47%) individuals.

Etymology
From, title of a legendary ruler of (an ancient precolonial state in the Philippines).

title: Gatchalian


text: Gatchalians

title: Gatchalians


text:
Griffo

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Griffo is the 29231st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 810 individuals. Griffo is most common among White (90.99%) individuals.

title: Griffo


text: Griffos

title: Griffos


text:
Tallapoosa County

Etymology
The name is of origin.

title: Tallapoosa County


text:
Henney

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Henney is the 29231st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 810 individuals. Henney is most common among White (89.38%) individuals.

title: Henney


text: Henneys

title: Henneys


text:
Carll

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Carll is the 29231st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 810 individuals. Carll is most common among White (92.96%) individuals.

title: Carll


text: Carlls

title: Carlls


text:
Carreira

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Carreira is the 29231st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 810 individuals. Carreira is most common among White (71.23%) and Multi-racial (11.98%) individuals.

title: Carreira


text: Carreiras

title: Carreiras


text:
Caroll

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Caroll is the 29231st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 810 individuals. Caroll is most common among White (75.43%) and Black/African American (17.41%) individuals.

title: Caroll


text: Carolls

title: Carolls


text:
Castaldi

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Castaldi is the 29261st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 809 individuals. Castaldi is most common among White (93.57%) individuals.

title: Castaldi


text: Castaldis

title: Castaldis


text:
Hamidi

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Hamidi is the 29261st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 809 individuals. Hamidi is most common among White (65.39%) and Multi-racial (26.08%) individuals.

title: Hamidi


text: Hamidis

title: Hamidis


text:
Figueira

Etymology
.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Figueira is the 29261st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 809 individuals. Figueira is most common among White (66.87%) and Hispanic/Latino (14.71%) individuals.

Etymology
From.

title: Figueira


text: Figueiras

title: Figueiras


text:
Eutsler

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Eutsler is the 29261st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 809 individuals. Eutsler is most common among White (94.31%) individuals.

title: Eutsler


text: Eutslers

title: Eutslers


text:
Esterly

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Esterly is the 29261st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 809 individuals. Esterly is most common among White (92.71%) individuals.

title: Esterly


text: Esterlys

title: Esterlys


text:
Fullenkamp

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Fullenkamp is the 29261st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 809 individuals. Fullenkamp is most common among White (98.89%) individuals.

title: Fullenkamp


text: Fullenkamps

title: Fullenkamps


text:
Nibert

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Nibert is the 29261st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 809 individuals. Nibert is most common among White (95.55%) individuals.

title: Nibert


text: Niberts

title: Niberts


text:
Nole

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Nole is the 29261st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 809 individuals. Nole is most common among White (68.73%), Black/African American (16.32%), and Hispanic/Latino (12.24%) individuals.

Noun

 * 1)  A member of the  team.

title: Nole


text: Noles

title: Noles


text:
Ruhlman

Etymology
Variant of.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Ruhlman is the 29261st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 809 individuals. Ruhlman is most common among White (97.16%) individuals.

title: Ruhlman


text: Ruhlmans

title: Ruhlmans


text:
Tavenner

Proper noun

 * 1)  for a taverner or innkeeper.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Tavenner is the 29261st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 809 individuals. Tavenner is most common among White (94.07%) individuals.

title: Tavenner


text: Tavenners

title: Tavenners


text:
Bald

Etymology

 * As a and  surname, from the personal name, or related to , where the first element is from the root of.
 * As an English and Scottish surname, related to.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Bald is the 29261st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 809 individuals. Bald is most common among White (87.14%) individuals.

title: Bald


text: Balds

title: Balds


text:
Uptain

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Uptain is the 29261st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 809 individuals. Uptain is most common among White (96.29%) individuals.

title: Uptain


text: Uptains

title: Uptains


text: jbd

title: jbd


text:
Vasseur

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Vasseur is the 29261st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 809 individuals. Vasseur is most common among White (90.23%) individuals.

title: Vasseur


text: Vasseurs

title: Vasseurs


text:
Vana

Etymology
surname, see.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Vana is the 29279th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 808 individuals. Vana is most common among White (89.6%) individuals.

title: Vana


text: Vanas

title: Vanas


text:
Trippe

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Trippe is the 29279th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 808 individuals. Trippe is most common among White (88.74%) individuals.

title: Trippe


text: Trippes

title: Trippes


text:
Bornemann

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Bornemann is the 29279th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 808 individuals. Bornemann is most common among White (96.04%) individuals.

title: Bornemann


text: Bornemanns

title: Bornemanns


text:
Bellar

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Bellar is the 29279th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 808 individuals. Bellar is most common among White (94.18%) individuals.

title: Bellar


text: Bellars

title: Bellars


text:
Рея

Proper noun

 * 1)  Rhea
 * 2)  Rhea, moon of Saturn

Etymology
From.

Proper noun

 * 1)  Rhea
 * 2)  Rhea, moon of Saturn

title: Рея


text:
Afanador

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Afanador is the 29279th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 808 individuals. Afanador is most common among Hispanic/Latino (89.85%) individuals.

title: Afanador


text: Afanadors

title: Afanadors


text:
Swango

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Swango is the 29279th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 808 individuals. Swango is most common among White (96.41%) individuals.

title: Swango


text: Swangos

title: Swangos


text:
Япет

Proper noun

 * 1)  Iapetus, moon of Saturn
 * 2)  Iapetus

title: Япет


text:
Synder

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Synder is the 29279th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 808 individuals. Synder is most common among White (83.04%) individuals.

title: Synder


text: Synders

title: Synders


text:
Ryer

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Ryer is the 29279th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 808 individuals. Ryer is most common among White (86.63%) individuals.

title: Ryer


text: Ryers

title: Ryers


text:
Диона

Proper noun

 * 1)  Dione
 * 2)  Dione, moon of Saturn

Proper noun

 * 1)  Dione
 * 2)  Dione, moon of Saturn

title: Диона


text:
Rollman

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Rollman is the 29279th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 808 individuals. Rollman is most common among White (94.31%) individuals.

title: Rollman


text: Rollmans

title: Rollmans


text:
עוף דורס

Noun

 * 1) bird of prey

title: עוף דורס


text:
Seney

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Seney is the 29279th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 808 individuals. Seney is most common among White (86.88%) individuals.

title: Seney


text: Seneys

title: Seneys


text:
Landolfi

Etymology
Borrowed from.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Landolfi is the 29279th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 808 individuals. Landolfi is most common among White (93.44%) individuals.

Etymology
From the personal name.

title: Landolfi


text: Landolfis

title: Landolfis


text:
Тетида

Proper noun

 * 1)  Tethys, moon of Saturn
 * 2)  Tethys

title: Тетида


text:
χαμᾶζε

Etymology
From the root of (from ) +.

Adverb

 * 1) to the ground

title: χαμᾶζε


text:
Kosik

Etymology
From, , , or.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Kosik is the 29279th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 808 individuals. Kosik is most common among White (94.8%) individuals.

title: Kosik


text: Kosiks

title: Kosiks


text:
Quero

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Quero is the 29279th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 808 individuals. Quero is most common among Hispanic/Latino (75.0%) and Asian/Pacific Islander (13.99%) individuals.

title: Quero


text: Queros

title: Queros


text:
Higbie

Etymology
Variant of.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Higbie is the 29279th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 808 individuals. Higbie is most common among White (97.28%) individuals.

title: Higbie


text: Higbies

title: Higbies


text:
Енцелад

Proper noun

 * 1)  Enceladus, moon of Saturn
 * 2)  Enceladus

title: Енцелад


text:
Brin

Etymology

 * As a Jewish surname, from, the name for.
 * Also as a Jewish surname, from, similar to.
 * As a surname, from the adjective.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Brin is the 29279th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 808 individuals. Brin is most common among White (85.52%) individuals.

title: Brin


text: Brins

title: Brins


text:
Dadeville

Etymology
From, named after.

title: Dadeville


text:
Cerino

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Cerino is the 29279th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 808 individuals. Cerino is most common among White (69.43%) and Hispanic/Latino (25.37%) individuals.

title: Cerino


text: Cerinos

title: Cerinos


text:
Мимас

Proper noun

 * 1)  Mimas, moon of Saturn
 * 2)  Mimas

title: Мимас


text:
Dohrmann

Etymology
Borrowed from.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Dohrmann is the 29279th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 808 individuals. Dohrmann is most common among White (92.7%) individuals.

title: Dohrmann


text: Dohrmanns

title: Dohrmanns


text:
Dona

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Dona is the 29309th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 807 individuals. Dona is most common among White (47.71%), Hispanic/Latino (26.52%), and Asian/Pacific Islander (19.45%) individuals.

title: Dona


text: Donas

title: Donas


text:
Cerveny

Etymology
From.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Cerveny is the 29309th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 807 individuals. Cerveny is most common among White (95.29%) individuals.

title: Cerveny


text: Cervenys

title: Cervenys


text:
Титания

Proper noun

 * 1)  Titania, moon of Uranus
 * 2) Titania, character of one of Shakespeare's plays

title: Титания


text:
Hieber

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Hieber is the 29309th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 807 individuals. Hieber is most common among White (95.91%) individuals.

title: Hieber


text: Hiebers

title: Hiebers


text:
Оберон

Proper noun

 * 1)  Oberon, moon of Uranus
 * 2) Oberon, character of one of Shakespeare's plays

title: Оберон


text:
Hoffa

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Hoffa is the 29309th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 807 individuals. Hoffa is most common among White (96.41%) individuals.

title: Hoffa


text: Hoffas

title: Hoffas


text:
Parrinello

Etymology
Borrowed from.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Parrinello is the 29309th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 807 individuals. Parrinello is most common among White (94.55%) individuals.

title: Parrinello


text: Parrinellos

title: Parrinellos


text:
Умбриел

Proper noun

 * 1)  Umbriel, moon of Uranus

title: Умбриел


text:
Justesen

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Justesen is the 29309th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 807 individuals. Justesen is most common among White (94.55%) individuals.

title: Justesen


text: Justesens

title: Justesens


text:
Ариел

Proper noun

 * 1)  Ariel, moon of Uranus

title: Ариел


text:
Klumb

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Klumb is the 29309th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 807 individuals. Klumb is most common among White (96.28%) individuals.

title: Klumb


text: Klumbs

title: Klumbs


text:
Миранда

Proper noun

 * 1)  Miranda, moon of Uranus
 * 2) Miranda, character of one of Shakespeare's plays

title: Миранда


text:
Manganaro

Etymology
Borrowed from.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Manganaro is the 29309th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 807 individuals. Manganaro is most common among White (96.65%) individuals.

title: Manganaro


text: Manganaros

title: Manganaros


text:
Spight

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Spight is the 29309th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 807 individuals. Spight is most common among Black/African American (84.26%) individuals.

title: Spight


text: Spights

title: Spights


text:
Szot

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Szot is the 29309th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 807 individuals. Szot is most common among White (96.41%) individuals.

title: Szot


text: Szots

title: Szots


text:
Abdella

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Abdella is the 29309th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 807 individuals. Abdella is most common among White (58.86%) and Black/African American (37.17%) individuals.

title: Abdella


text: Abdellas

title: Abdellas


text:
Zerby

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Zerby is the 29309th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 807 individuals. Zerby is most common among White (95.17%) individuals.

title: Zerby


text: Zerbys

title: Zerbys


text:
Харон

Proper noun

 * 1)  Charon, moon of Pluto
 * 2)  Charon

title: Харон


text:
Tuft

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Tuft is the 29309th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 807 individuals. Tuft is most common among White (76.21%) and Black/African American (20.94%) individuals.

title: Tuft


text:
Tufts

Etymology 1
Variant of.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Tufts is the 11420th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 2759 individuals. Tufts is most common among White (86.48%) individuals.

title: Tufts


text:
Vitug

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Vitug is the 29334th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 806 individuals. Vitug is most common among Asian/Pacific Islander (88.34%) individuals.

title: Vitug


text: Vitugs

title: Vitugs


text:
Czarny

Etymology
From.

title: Czarny


text:
Хидра

Proper noun

 * 1)  Hydra, moon of Pluto
 * 2)  Hydra

title: Хидра


text:
Viverette

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Viverette is the 29334th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 806 individuals. Viverette is most common among Black/African American (50.99%) and White (46.28%) individuals.

title: Viverette


text: Viverettes

title: Viverettes


text:
Whelpley

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Whelpley is the 29334th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 806 individuals. Whelpley is most common among White (93.55%) individuals.

title: Whelpley


text: Whelpleys

title: Whelpleys


text:
Wanzer

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Wanzer is the 29334th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 806 individuals. Wanzer is most common among White (58.93%) and Black/African American (35.36%) individuals.

title: Wanzer


text: Wanzers

title: Wanzers


text:
Wahler

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Wahler is the 29334th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 806 individuals. Wahler is most common among White (95.04%) individuals.

title: Wahler


text: Wahlers

title: Wahlers


text:
Walford

Etymology
Various origins:
 * The village in Shropshire is named with +.
 * The village in Herefordshire is named with +.

Proper noun

 * 1) A placename:

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Walford is the 29334th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 806 individuals. Walford is most common among White (67.62%) and Black/African American (25.81%) individuals.

title: Walford


text: Walfords

title: Walfords


text:
User talk:Gfarnab

Avestan descendants
New Persian comes from Old Persian, not Avestan. Please do not add any more Persian on the Avestan entries. —Aryaman (मुझसे बात करो) 19:28, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Now that I know you, Aryaman, I understand why the Persian section in the Wiktionary is so poor.
 * I'm not sure I understand. I don't edit any New Persian, nor do I speak it. में सिर्फ़ हिंदी लेख बनाता हूँ। You're adding a descendants sections to Avestan with New Persian. New Persian does take words from Avestan, but I suspect all the ones you've added are from Old Persian in actuality. If you speak Persian, why don't you make the Persian entries better rather than insulting others? —Aryaman (मुझसे बात करो) 02:45, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

That you claim I insult others (whilst I at any point did such a thing) attests to your lack of reading comprehension and further proves my initial point.
 * "Now that I know you, Aryaman, I understand why the Persian section in the Wiktionary is so poor." Good job I guess, now that you've proved your point. —Aryaman (मुझसे बात करो) 00:48, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Welcome message
Perhaps we got off on the wrong foot. Sorry for my unfriendliness. I've put the standard welcome message below so you know which templates to use and such (e.g. is only used in translation tables):

Welcome!

Hello, welcome to Wiktionary, and thank you for your contributions so far.

If you are unfamiliar with wiki editing, take a look at Help:How to edit a page. It is a concise list of technical guidelines to the wiki format we use here: how to, for example, make text boldfaced or create hyperlinks. Feel free to practice in the sandbox. If you would like a slower introduction we have a short tutorial.

These links may help you familiarize yourself with Wiktionary:

 * Entry layout (EL) is a detailed policy documenting how Wiktionary pages should be formatted. All entries should conform to this standard. The easiest way to start off is to copy the contents of an existing page for a similar word, and then adapt it to fit the entry you are creating.
 * Our Criteria for inclusion (CFI) define exactly which words can be added to Wiktionary, though it may be a bit technical and longwinded. The most important part is that Wiktionary only accepts words that have been in somewhat widespread use over the course of at least a year, and citations that demonstrate usage can be asked for when there is doubt.
 * If you already have some experience with editing our sister project Wikipedia, then you may find our guide for Wikipedia users useful.
 * The FAQ aims to answer most of your remaining questions, and there are several help pages that you can browse for more information.
 * A glossary of our technical jargon, and some hints for dealing with the more common communication issues.
 * If you have anything to ask about or suggest, we have several discussion rooms. Feel free to ask any other editors in person if you have any problems or question, by posting a message on their talk page.

You are encouraged to add a BabelBox to your userpage. This shows which languages you know, so other editors know which languages you'll be working on, and what they can ask you for help with.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wiktionarian! If you have any questions, bring them to the Information desk, or ask me on my talk page. If you do so, please sign your posts with four tildes: ~ which automatically produces your username and the current date and time.

Again, welcome! —Aryaman (मुझसे बात करो) 12:35, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

I appreciate your last message and look forward to being a valuable member of the community. मैं तुम्हारे लिए बहुल आशीषें भेजता हूँ! Gfarnab
 * आपकी बहुत धन्यवाद! यहां हिंदी (और फ़ारसी) बोलनेवाले की कमी है। —Aryaman (मुझसे बात करो) 17:28, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Making too many errors in Chinese entries
Please do not edit Chinese entries - many of the examples you added are completely ungrammatical. Wyang (talk) 10:01, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
 * You are too sure for your own good, because the examples I use are extracted from recognized and long-standing sources. In any event, I have answered lengthily in the Beer Parlour so you are welcome to go back there and have a look. And have a nice day too! User:Gfarnab
 * Hello. You should make a basic user page first, stating languages you know, so that people know if you're relying on your own knowledge or using dictionaries or other sources. is a popular template for this. As for Russian, it's now considered incorrect to transliterated образ (without a stress mark) as "óbraz" (with a stress mark), you should use stress marks and rely on automatic transliteration in most cases, e.g. . User:Benwing2 is also quite active in Russian and can hopefully give you some guidance about the templates to use.--Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 12:58, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your message: I will pay attention to the way you transcribe things here and adapt to it. Re creating a user page with my language knowledge, I do not think is the most productive use of my time, for I rather keep bettering the Wiktionary than add badges to my page. And if users want to know whether I am "relying on your own knowledge or using dictionaries" they can google the example phrases and find out where they are from (in Russian they are never mine, but rather from ruscorpora.ru).
 * I fail to see how 邊防們許可過境邊界 is from any recognized or long-standing source; it's absolutely terrible. BTW, it's general courtesy to put a on your userpage as a minimum, just as a way for other users to know where your linguistic abilities stand and be able check your edits accordingly, definitely not a waste of time. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 22:31, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Please be careful
Language codes matter. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 13:40, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Hindi
Please slow down. You're making quite a few mistakes in content (I'm not too worried about formatting, that can be fixed quickly). How much do you know about Hindi grammar? मरवा is not a very common noun, and it certainly is not from मर्वति nor is it the source of मरवा डालना. It's actually just the stem of मरवाना, to get someone to kill someone else. Again, please don't guess if you aren't sure about something, just ask me or another editor so we can limit incorrect information. Thanks. —Aryaman (मुझसे बात करो) 04:20, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Babel
Could you place Babel to your user page? I'd appreciate it. --Dan Polansky (talk) 09:35, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

 * Seconded. Er wait. Thirded omg no — fourthed .  —  Z. [ קהת ] b"A. — 03:19, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Editing in languages you are unfamiliar with
Hi, please stop editing in languages that you are unfamiliar with. You are making too many mistakes. --WikiTiki89 19:13, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes and Persian doesn't use letter ي at all. It's ی. -Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 21:20, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't have time to teach you anything but before you do your creative editing you may take a look at the relevant Dehkhoda Dictionary entry: عریس. Have fun learning! Gfarnab
 * The problem with your edits is even more serious. You just blindly copy from various sources. The Persian spelling is عریس, which looks the same as the Arabic عريس. We don't have the time to teach either. You're making substantial edits in the main space, not in your sandbox.--Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 21:54, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Also why are you adding so many senses to Hindi words (at and )? Plus, the usex you took out of the Bible at  was way too complicated (and unsourced). —Aryaman (मुझसे बात करो) 03:31, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

 * Note that if I (or any other administrator) sees further evidence of edits that are copied entirely from uncited sources or incorrect, this is your warning that you may be blocked. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 03:50, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I am happy to read that you have chosen Farnab Airlines to spend your precious time again and I wish you all the best of success Gfarnab

fardo
Gfarnab, just a note about adding a header for references. If you only put two = signs, as in ==References==, the software will treat it as a language named References. Be sure to use at least three = signs: ===References===. I have corrected this in. Thanks. 11:45, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks to you! I'll keep it in mind so that you needn't bother again. Gfarnab

Making too many errors in Chinese entries - again
You have been reminded and warned before about not editing in languages you are not familiar with, particularly Chinese. Yet, you continue to ignore the reminders, and make errors in the Chinese entries you have edited since then. They include:, , , ,. There are glaring factual errors in all of these edits ― which ― I'm going to assume you are unable to identify. Let me be blunt here: you have no idea what you are doing with Chinese, specifically Classical Chinese quotations. Please do not edit in Chinese any more. Wyang (talk) 13:04, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Per your warning given above, this merits a block. I can't personally assess the quality of most of Gfarnab's recent contributions, but should look them over for their respective languages. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 17:55, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
 * It's as thought he doesn't even look at the entry sometimes. --WikiTiki89 15:38, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
 * The Hindi and Sanskrit are good now. Most of them were already okay. Somebody ought to check the Persian and Arabic lemmas too. —Aryaman (मुझसे बात करो) 15:47, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I checked the Arabic ones (and also the Persian ones, but I'm less of an expert there), and they seem fine now. But maybe someone could double-check the Persian ones. --WikiTiki89 16:03, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Russian edits are fine but it's obvious that he doesn't have a reasonable level of Russian but just uses good resources. He doesn't add stresses and doesn't add doesn't use ё when necessary. Not sure if encouraging him to use the established dictionary style will cause him to produce errors - no stress is better than wrong stress and mixing е and ё would be even worse. Etymologies are not impressive because he uses related words, rather than showing the exact etymology but etymologies is not my forte and I am less focused on it. Still, no etymology is better than poor etymology. It surprises me that unlike most beginners, he doesn't work on simple but complex things, like adding usage examples with long sentences. IMO, missing stresses and failure to use "ё" adds little value and breaks the established practice.
 * In any case, serious mistakes in Chinese warrant a block, even if other languages are fine but I haven't checked all of his Russian or other edits. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 22:37, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Are you kidding? In his Russian edits, his etymologies were wrong, he added Vasmer links to words that aren't in Vasmer, and he doesn't pay attention to the content of the page he is adding an etymology to. --WikiTiki89 23:12, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I am not kidding. I may have missed something, just point it out, no need for this tone. I said I haven't checked thoroughly. My point is still the same - some good edits are cancelled out by many bad ones and the block is merited. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 23:27, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
 * , could you please double-check the Persian ones? —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 23:59, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
 * The Persian ones look OK. --Z 13:23, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

احتكار
You created an entry with the wrong spelling (it doesn't have a hamza), misuse of templates and insufficiently vocalised text to produce a transliteration, all of which you should have noticed. Luckily, a native speaker dropped by and fixed everything for you. As far as I can tell, you are continuing to edit in languages you don't know, and aren't even careful enough to look over your entries or do a good job of it. You can become a contributing member of the Wiktionary community, but not if you have no regard for the quality of the dictionary. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 05:19, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Block
. Permanently blocked. Wyang (talk) 08:40, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Do you think User:خبيث could be Gfarnab? (S)he is editing Persian, Arabic, and Sanskrit a lot, as well as adding Hindi usage examples, just like Gfarnab. —AryamanA (मुझसे बात करें • योगदान) 23:48, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
 * I agree. Wyang (talk) 23:54, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
 * 🇨🇬 means "sly, cunning" too lol —AryamanA (मुझसे बात करें • योगदान) 23:56, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Has that account made errors worthy of blocking on its own merits? If not, can confirm that the user is the same? —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 00:05, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
 * I see the typical distribution in wrong vocalizations: ج ر ب, ه ي ء, جل. I see brainless copying from Almaany, even more wrong thereafter (for example this entry جل where the “sail”, “rose” and “jasmine” meanings are from Almaany, but the Arabic header has been copied from another header with different vocalization). And the most striking thing are the grammar errors/incomprehensible quote translations which I have read from Gfarnab. Palaestrator verborum (loquier) 02:03, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't see anything wrong in Hindi, it's just the usexes are really useless to learners; they seem like quotes to me. Obviously, the issues in other languages make it apparent it his him/her. —AryamanA (मुझसे बात करें • योगदान) 02:17, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Confirmed and blocked. Chuck Entz (talk) 03:50, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

One more
User:कूक. Please help check. Thanks! Wyang (talk) 14:56, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
 * In case anyone's wondering: 🇨🇬. —AryamanA (मुझसे बात करें • योगदान) 15:10, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Confirmed and blocked. Chuck Entz (talk) 16:49, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

I would not be surprised that User:妄为我工作 created on 18:07 (GMT+1) is Gfarnab. He has a Chinese name and starts to make Arabic things, including adding Arabic terms without vocalization of course. Palaestrator verborum (loquier) 17:52, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
 * I agree. It means "I work recklessly" I think. . —AryamanA (मुझसे बात करें • योगदान) 19:12, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Confirmed and blocked. Chuck Entz (talk) 20:56, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
 * ... Or is supposed to be the Chinese translation for 'I work recklessly'... Wyang (talk) 00:35, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Of course, I suppose the correct translation would be 我妄工作? —AryamanA (मुझसे बात करें • योगदान) 00:50, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
 * 妄 is limited in usage and cannot collocate with 工作. I can't think of a good exact translation for 'I work recklessly' for now. May need more context to know what this is supposed to mean... it could be '我(肆意)妄为' (I do/work as I want). Wyang (talk) 00:57, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Special:Contributions/छद्मन् Palaestrator verborum (loquier) 20:10, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
 * I've preemptively blocked him. if you wanted to know the meaning. —AryamanA (मुझसे बात करें • योगदान) 21:18, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, I looked it up, and even without it I was convinced after his first three edits. Too many coincidences, that random reckless behavior as we know it. Palaestrator verborum (loquier) 21:27, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
 * It looks like it. They're using an anonymous proxy, but everything else is the same. Chuck Entz (talk) 13:39, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

I have a feeling about User:VivAra. —AryamanA (मुझसे बात करें • योगदान) 00:50, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Yep. Anonymous proxy again. Chuck Entz (talk) 07:51, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
 * User:Gendannede. --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 19:00, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Why is he so persistent? I just blocked two more that were imitating other usernames using similar looking characters. —AryamanA (मुझसे बात करें • योगदान) 19:44, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
 * The same reason he got blocked in the first place: arrogant overconfidence, combined with stubbornness and a tendency to take any limitation on him as a personal affront. He doesn't seem to realize that it's the bad edits, not the username, that are giving him away. On the plus side, he's finding lots of anonymous proxies that need to be blocked. Chuck Entz (talk) 04:30, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Because I love languages better than you love censorship.

P.S.: Chucky, I have a very special present for you: a proxy list! Do not slack: ban them all before I use them!

 * 13.10.23.1-255
 * 54.187.174.169
 * 148.133.157.222
 * 171.236.240.99
 * 216.191.89.204
 * 231.39.111.18
 * 63.218.6.30
 * 56.180.146.198
 * 19.9.26.93
 * 248.134.129.151
 * 28.123.58.139
 * 148.118.72.53
 * 54.187.205.235
 * 100.211.216.72
 * 208.36.218.134
 * 81.68.150.94
 * 126.10.231.253
 * 112.68.92.179
 * 85.236.48.152
 * 133.213.127.218
 * 78.158.120.123
 * 225.190.139.51
 * 136.176.240.70
 * 172.128.1.102
 * 201.171.25.66
 * 88.241.31.99
 * 54.241.31.102
 * 89.147.34.107
 * 192.168.1.6
 * 13.130.23.255
 * 50.18.212.157
 * 118.215.233.187
 * 86.124.201.30
 * 163.78.107.86
 * 60.30.163.22
 * 225.195.143.20
 * 141.104.44.78
 * 22.228.216.30
 * 242.178.36.165
 * 64.121.116.34
 * 73.39.218.115
 * 10.18.212.223
 * 51.25.214.31
 * 79.26.11.205
 * 52.26.14.11
 * 109.11.10.41
 * 52.8.19.58
 * 72.212.33.140
 * 201.87.91.102
 * 251.175.184.192
 * 53.79.113.152
 * 100.174.64.112
 * 127.0.0.1
 * 118.46.216.161
 * 213.231.207.25
 * 166.172.230.5
 * 238.175.214.242
 * 136.175.143.30
 * 52.8.8.189
 * 54.149.153.72
 * 201.5.62.129
 * 116.109.212.210
 * 21.92.136.125
 * 45.149.211.236
 * 170.150.99.235
 * 76.180.70.204
 * 231.14.220.107
 * 54.67.48.128
 * 180.140.225.34
 * 111.66.26.125
 * 36.121.0.104
 * 83.187.182.230
 * 54.187.199.38
 * 96.152.203.118
 * 23.36.83.47
 * 212.182.151.226
 * 204.167.117.227
 * 116.198.126.26
 * 176.40.197.62
 * 0.199.45.64
 * 247.252.166.23
 * 35.122.123.0
 * 222.108.76.7
 * 54.187.208.163
 * 54.67.52.245
 * 66.183.104.179
 * 198.181.86.100
 * 72.215.91.48
 * 160.140.94.198
 * 222.177.72.8
 * 59.245.119.63
 * 124.207.113.87
 * 151.197.134.222
 * 115.91.205.240
 * 0.15.23.176
 * 54.68.165.206
 * 155.6.197.30
 * 107.23.48.182
 * 199.242.31.84
 * 238.116.4.167
 * 150.73.16.250
 * 63.232.142.158
 * 246.124.221.232
 * 154.167.132.36
 * 212.230.140.183
 * 228.9.117.254
 * 138.228.20.53
 * 54.68.183.151
 * 107.23.48.232

Merry Christmass to y’all!
 * I think it's hilarious that you misspelled Christmas. How apt. —AryamanA (मुझसे बात करें • योगदान) 12:33, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
 * It's not censorship if all they're trying to do is keep incorrect content out of Wiktionary. And you don't love languages if you, with zero regard for correctness, work to degrade the quality of their lemmas. -- माधवपंडित (talk) 15:37, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

 * I don't love censorship, you don't love language (reckless disregard for accuracy is as bad as deliberate vandalism), and those don't seem to be anonymous proxies (not that I would waste my time testing- spot checks in online databases say they aren't). Thanks for proving my point. Chuck Entz (talk) 21:01, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
 * . --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 01:21, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

 * Hi. Please check Special:Contributions/185.245.191.14. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 10:20, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
 * If the nasty attitude and shoddy edits weren't enough evidence, confirmed and blocked. Chuck Entz (talk) 14:46, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

 * : Please check User:紙板拐杖. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 21:39, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Yep. Oddly enough, the anonymous proxy they've been using is also being used by a spambot with a throwaway account. I was taken aback when I saw an abuse filter hit that started out with "Hi, I'm a Vietnamese female, and here's my website"- until I noticed that although it was the same IP, other details were different. Chuck Entz (talk) 03:01, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Don't the people at Meta block open proxies from time to time? —suzukaze (t・c) 03:13, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes, but there's a difference between an anonymous proxy (which is what this is) and an open proxy (which it might also be). The former are used legitimately to get around censorship by oppressive governments, but the latter is a real problem for a wiki because you can't establish attribution for the Creative Commons license. I'm a little fuzzy on what our current policy is on these. Chuck Entz (talk) 04:15, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Hi, here is another: Special:Contributions/217.9.91.108 Kaixinguo~enwiktionary (talk) 13:01, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

A rare account in the Wiktionary (with sources, without scorn)
I was initially told not to edit Avestan and Old Persian by someone who, by his account, has not a grasp of said languages and claimed further that I had insulted him -re my reply wherein no insult is to be found-, signalling faulty reading comprehension [1]. I then got an apology, which I accepted [2], thinking that would be the end of it, but shortly after Wyang (now an admin) claimed my Chinese edits were “completely ungrammatical” because he heeded not that the phrases I used were from Confucian texts (ie, grammatically different than today’s Standard Chinese) [3], and this time I got no apology when I pointed his mistake out.

I was, too, told to employ mainstream sources -and cite them properly-, which I gladly did until my entries using Strong’s Bible Concordance and the Vasmer Dictionary were deemed faulty as well without further elaboration (ie, the ones who accused me of not citing sources still accused me -without citing anything- when I used them [4], [5]). Further instances chanced wherein an admin (Wyang) wrote in my talkpage I was “making mistakes” in my edits, whereas his ulterior fixes showed no correction re mines [6], [7], [8], [9] (he added -in my opinion- useful stuff in his edits but did not correct what I wrote). There were, in addition, “amusing” situations wherewith an admin called for someone to “fix” an entry I created in Catalan (ie, one of my mother tongues) [10], despite his inability to understand whether it needed a fix or not but, alas, I quarreled not back then and my main user (Gfarnab) was permanently banned by Wyang.

Since then -while editing with sock accounts- some of the Sanskrit translations I added were obliterated by an admin who explicitly recognizes his incapability of judging their adequacy [11], my aim of archiving the 2017 conversations in my talkpage was deemed “vandalism” [12] by an admin who immediately after deleted content therefrom (not giving a reason for it) [13]. All this, I posited, could be a tremendous misunderstanding, but shortly after one of the most active and knowledgeable contributors around (Palaestrator verborum) was banned by the same admin and wrote he had “been banned under a pretext by an administrator who no doubt wanted to ban me the first time I talked with him” [14], leading me to discern a pattern which I hazard will also be discernable by you.

Being healthy and young as I am I can keep editing with sockets for the next 60 years, but I know this is not the best arrangement possible for the Wiktionary (why would admins squander time fruitlessly banning throwaway IPs of mine for 60 years?). I hereby ask for my ban to be lifted immediately and, for the sake of the community, an agreement to be found between me and those who are wasting their precious time with unsourced and contradictory stings against me. I know, eg, Wyang has not shown us to be the best negotiator, but on the other hand I am more agreeable than Rua so I think we can succeed in finding a stable array which works best for everyone (and may you pardon the unpardonable length of my message: this is what happens when months of grievances go ungrieved).

Sincerely, Gfarnab

[1] https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gfarnab&oldid=47041398

[2] https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gfarnab&oldid=47045096

[3] https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gfarnab&oldid=47148105

[4] https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gfarnab&oldid=47448393#Making_too_many_errors_in_Chinese_entries_-_again

[5] https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gfarnab&oldid=47219183

[6] https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=%E5%AD%9D&type=revision&diff=47297469&oldid=47295459

[7] https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=%E9%9B%B7&type=revision&diff=48162324&oldid=47295417

[8] https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=%E9%81%B7&type=revision&diff=47450157&oldid=47323937

[9] https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=%E6%81%A3&action=historysubmit&type=revision&diff=47450110&oldid=47341521

[10] https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:safareig&oldid=47601964

[11] https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=Wiktionary:Beer_parlour/2018/January&oldid=48433392

[12] https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gfarnab&diff=48417051&oldid=48417049

[13] https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gfarnab&diff=48423471&oldid=48417053

[14] https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Palaestrator_verborum&oldid=48426033

 * Virtually every single one of your Chinese edits had to be fixed. Just take a look at these changes of yours:, , . They are absolutely horrible, showing that your knowledge of Chinese is extremely poor, and your inability to recognise that and be humble about it is what led to your permanent block. Please go and learn these languages you are editing in if you would like your edits to be taken seriously. I've reduced your block to 5 years. (Btw, the average life expectancy of the world in 2015 is 71.4 years.) Wyang (talk) 14:51, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Per w:Wikipedia:Standard offer I think this user can be unblocked after six months if he promise to avoid the behavior that led to the block and don't use any user or IP to edit in six months. you may consider restore this user's talk page and email access (which can be revoked if being misused again).--Zcreator (talk) 15:00, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm hesitant even reducing it to 5 years. The insight to the problem, as shown in this post, is still incredibly poor. There is continued block evasion and sockpuppetry, and the same pattern of problematic edits and defiance persists through his sockpuppets. I don't think the talk page and email access should be restored; it was misused only very recently. As Gfarnab describes himself as being "healthy and young", I only hope that he can develop his knowledge and become more mature as time passes. Wyang (talk) 15:21, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
 * He is in fact evading the block right now, and has been evading it for a while. He also emptied this talk page once while blocked already, so I don't think the standard offer is valid anymore. —AryamanA (मुझसे बात करें • योगदान) 16:15, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Although no comment on Wyang and AryamanA's decision, but it should be noted that block evasion usually does not make standard offer invalid. It just reset the timer.--Zcreator (talk) 16:23, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I suppose that's fair. I still doubt Gfarnab will be able to not evade his block for 6 months. —AryamanA (मुझसे बात करें • योगदान) 17:47, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I (am a very patient man who) can do that if plights to unblock me by the 19th of July 2018
 * Yet again, and even though “most administrators and the community accept [the Standard offer as a common route to having a block reviewed”], Wyang fails to compromise and negotiate: you read it (not) here first., , ,
 * I wish y’all the best of success. उबाऊ शब्दावली (talk) 11:18, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
 * We're not Wikipedia. Also, शब्दावली means "glossary". —AryamanA (मुझसे बात करें • योगदान) 15:08, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I would gladly write with Gfarnab (were he not banned). I did not empty my talkpage as you claim: I tried to move the 2017 conversations to their respective archive (and found I could not do that with Gfarnab, so I tried to do it with a socket and thereat Wyang reverted it and later deleted part thereof: if you care about someone deleting content from my page write to him and not to me).
 * यदि त्वम् संस्कृतम् लेखितुं शक्नोषि, संस्कृतम् लिख ॥ All the Sanskrit contributors have to devote time just to clean up your edits. Also, you called Wyang "Lenin", and now you claim you can negotiate reasonably with him? I don't mind blocking you another time. —AryamanA (मुझसे बात करें • योगदान) 15:18, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
 * The use of adverbs hoping they reinforce your argument (in 2 short paragraphs we have “virtually”, “absolutely”, “extremely” and “incredibly”) shows you have not been trained in debate and that is why you feel the need to be dictatorial.

 * Not tolerating (and not willing to compromise with) the variety of styles in editing or coding is what led you to clash with Rua: your “issue” with me is but a link of your manifest chain of conduct. Plus, I encourage you to remember that your original message called the Confucian quotes I added “completely ungrammatical”, and for that you have not yet apologized, nor admitted wrongdoing.

 * मुह्यतमुहुः यतः लेनिनस्युः नलिलेख लल्यन्ते लेनिनिनलट्वां लोकेनलिलेख

 * Re-infinitely blocked. How you can still have the courage to shamelessly defend your edits is unbelievable. Take a look at . What a waste of time talking to you. Wyang (talk) 16:45, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

 * I see no inkling of comprehension on your part of the real problem: an arrogant overconfidence in your ability to add content in languages you don't speak. It's one thing to understand a language. Speaking and writing competently is far more difficult- I'm not sure you've reached that level (at least not consistently or reliably). But you're going far beyond that: you're convinced that you're good enough to set standards for others to follow, to educate people in those languages. People who know far more than you do have been telling you you're not as good as you think you are and that you're making serious errors.
 * You're rationalizing it all as other people being difficult and judgmental, but you're wrong. I've seen Wyang collaborating with just about everyone who knows the languages and is serious about doing things right, bending over backward to accommodate them and make their ideas work with his. AryamanA is young and idealistic and works hard to enable and cultivate contributors within his own area of knowledge. He's not an expert yet, but he's learning fast and he's open to suggestions and guidance from others who know more than he does. Neither of them is the petty, territorial type you seem to think they are. If your edits were actually any good, they'd be the first to say so. But they aren't.
 * You strike me as someone with a natural talent for languages, which is a handicap as well as a gift: those of us without it had to learn to work within our limitations- but you haven't. Your limitations may be different from ours, but make no mistake- everyone has them. Until you learn that lesson, you'll always be at risk for a catastrophic failure you probably won't see coming. Consider yourself lucky it's just a conflict over an online dictionary, and not something that might destroy your life or career. Chuck Entz (talk) 00:21, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I gave you links to him confessing not to know Sanskrit and yet erasing my Sanskrit translations: you could have tackled that instead of telling me he “works hard to enable and cultivate contributors” (why would I be moved by you sharing your impressions when I presented proof of the contrary?). And I assume you have not read this from him, lest you willfully side with he who erst falsely accused me of insulting him (vd. supra) and then insulted me:
 * कुछ नहीं आता इस बावले को, फिर भी अपने आप को ख़ुदा समझता है
 * Neither have I seen you reminding Dick Laurent that “simply being "not as mean as the next editor could be" is no excuse for being uncivil”:
 * 19 jan 2018 19:36 (overleg | bijdragen) heeft बावला (overleg | bijdragen) geblokkeerd voor de duur van onbepaald (aanmaken accounts uitgeschakeld, e-mail uitgeschakeld, kan eigen overlegpagina niet bewerken) (sockpuppet of famous psycho gfarnab)
 * Whilst I did not insult anyone, I have been insulted.
 * You also claimed “we all have limitations” (is that something you thought I didn’t know?), yet is me who is banned and not them. You wrote about my “arrogant overconfidence” (again: have you ever been convinced by adjectives?) and below you assert I am “rationalizing” and have not learnt to work within my limitations yet you offer no proof thereto and tell me, in lieu, about your cognitive limitations: quam rem, sodalis?.
 * Moreover, the message above yours is Wyang again not rebutting my case but using more adverbs after I remarked that they do not further arguments, yet you aver it is me (who answered queries even though you have not addressed mines) the one having “no inkling of comprehension”.
 * Thanks for all useful edits to the Wiktionary you have done throughout the years. झक्की (talk) 19:19, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry for that, I was fed up after cleaning up dozens of your edits. I mostly got along with you before your block though, you can't have forgotten the first two convos on this talk page?
 * I'm frustrated that you refuse to defer to editors who are more experienced in some of the areas you've edited. Why can't you accept that you might be wrong? —AryamanA (मुझसे बात करें • योगदान) 20:24, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

 * You needn’t be sorry: I don't take insults on the internet personally.
 * Re your second question: I have several times admitted wrongdoing here (see, eg, this) and learnt a lot from you. In fact, every “recoding” you make of my entries which I don’t rollback is a tacit, yet fully valid, admission that you know how to do that better than me. But maybe, judging from your question and Chuck’s comment above, you have crafted of me an opinion not congruent with all information available here.
 * Re your first question: I have wis not forgotten. I was improving my editing skills until the ban, at which point, I’m sure you’ll understand, I found no incentive to improve in that department since no matter what my sockets were banned. This situation, you admit, has frustrated you and I am sorry to read that: the ban only made things worse, hence why I asked for it to be revised.
 * Is up to you, Irman! झक्की (talk) 03:22, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Please stop adding translations from Globse to Persian
Hello, please could you stop adding these translations from Globse. Thank you. Kaixinguo~enwiktionary (talk) 19:12, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Also, could you watch out for the full stop at the end of your etymology sections? Cheers. Kaixinguo~enwiktionary (talk) 19:17, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

 * If you have any opinion on the wording of either 'Borrowed from...' or 'From...' please let me know. Thank you. Kaixinguo~enwiktionary (talk) 13:46, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Gfarnab cannot edit their own talk page, via the block from January 2018. --Dan Polansky (talk) 19:17, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
 * That sure hasn't stopped him. Ever heard of sockpuppets? —AryamanA (मुझसे बात करें • योगदान) 19:25, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I am just pointing out to Kaixinguo that he will get no "opinion" from Gfarnab user account. In my view, the most practical solution would be to unblock Gfarnab, and reblock for, say, a month, as soon as problematic behavior recurs, but do not block the talk page since posts to talk page usually do not harm the project. --Dan Polansky (talk) 19:40, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
 * That's been done before and it didn't work. His talk page posts do harm the project (he has a tendency to make aggressive posts, borderline personality attacks), and in this "arrangement" his editing is tolerated as long as he doesn't do anything of that sort. I think it's working well so far, but I think it's too early to unblock this account. It would be a symbolic gesture anyways, it's not like he's stopped editing. —AryamanA (मुझसे बात करें • योगदान) 22:19, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Re: "it's not like he's stopped editing": Right. And therefore, let us be nice on us (not on Gfarnab), and simplify the accounting. --Dan Polansky (talk) 11:40, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Gfarnab is a de facto editor of Persian, so we might as well discuss these minor formatting issues. Kaixinguo~enwiktionary (talk) 17:47, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I think he looks at this page, anyway. But thanks for letting me know. Kaixinguo~enwiktionary (talk) 17:48, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Persian transliteration/romanisation
Hello, I couldn't ping you but if you have an opinion on this then please add it at Wiktionary_talk:About_Persian. Kaixinguo~enwiktionary (talk) 13:48, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Why are you inviting a blocked user with multiple offenses?! --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 13:58, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I shan’t put words in his keyboard, but maybe ‘tis because he’s building community, as editors are meant to do. Do you, Anatoli, remember when you began reverting all my edits and you had to concede defeat shortly after? That was dumb. Smart is collaboration.
 * Come on... that is uncalled for. Kaixinguo~enwiktionary (talk) 00:19, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I left a message here because there have been either IP or new account edits in Persian for a while now that were not being addressed. User:AryamanA was sorting out the Hindi entries but these entries were just building up. I'm sure you realise this, but there's already a backlog going back a couple of years of entries by various users that need formatting, it doesn't need to be added to. GFarnab, that's not a dig at you, some of those entries are mine! Kaixinguo~enwiktionary (talk) 00:30, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Is fine, dude: one thing you don't have to care about here is not to offend me. Happy Easter!
 * I’ll answer here all topics you brought in my talkpage rather than in separate places:
 * I can't stop adding Globse, nor Glosbe, translations because I never began doing such thing
 * Rivers of pixels have been poured into the bor discussion and I have nothing to add thereto. The important thing is that we keep overall the same format, as we are doing, so that if in the future there is more -or just another- consensus all bor can easily be changed.
 * The only capitalization I have seen in transliterations is to distinguish letters in the transliterated language (eg, pataka and paTaka to distinguish and ), thence the addition of other capital letters therein may cause a bit of confusion, at first, in some readers, but I deem that a fish too small for the big frying pan y’all seem to have in that regard. If more people don’t use the Persian Wiktionary is not because of our transliteration method, but because ‘tis comparably poor in lemmas: our main aim should thus be, for the nonce, to expand the lemmas and then, when we have Dehkhodalike quantity, focus on those aspects -like transliteration- wherein most users, fleeting as they are consulting the Wiktionary, will not even know that there could be a problem.
 * (Tl;dr we rather not use capitalization from now on, but our time is better spent adding and improving Persian lemmas than discussing.)
 * Rivers of pixels have been poured into the bor discussion and I have nothing to add thereto. The important thing is that we keep overall the same format, as we are doing, so that if in the future there is more -or just another- consensus all bor can easily be changed.
 * The only capitalization I have seen in transliterations is to distinguish letters in the transliterated language (eg, pataka and paTaka to distinguish and ), thence the addition of other capital letters therein may cause a bit of confusion, at first, in some readers, but I deem that a fish too small for the big frying pan y’all seem to have in that regard. If more people don’t use the Persian Wiktionary is not because of our transliteration method, but because ‘tis comparably poor in lemmas: our main aim should thus be, for the nonce, to expand the lemmas and then, when we have Dehkhodalike quantity, focus on those aspects -like transliteration- wherein most users, fleeting as they are consulting the Wiktionary, will not even know that there could be a problem.
 * (Tl;dr we rather not use capitalization from now on, but our time is better spent adding and improving Persian lemmas than discussing.)
 * (Tl;dr we rather not use capitalization from now on, but our time is better spent adding and improving Persian lemmas than discussing.)
 * (Tl;dr we rather not use capitalization from now on, but our time is better spent adding and improving Persian lemmas than discussing.)

 * : The blocked user is not entitled to any discussions, he can rant away here, since this page is unblocked and he will continue to abuse this community but please don't enable him by asking his opinion. He will only be able to edit existing entries. All new creations will be nuked, if I or other admin gets around to do it. If you think his block was unfair, bring it up in a proper place. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 02:54, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

title: User talk:Gfarnab


text:
Wlodarczyk

Etymology
.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Wlodarczyk is the 29334th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 806 individuals. Wlodarczyk is most common among White (97.02%) individuals.

title: Wlodarczyk


text: Wlodarczyks

title: Wlodarczyks


text:
Wikstrom

Etymology
Borrowed from, from +.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Wikstrom is the 29334th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 806 individuals. Wikstrom is most common among White (93.05%) individuals.

title: Wikstrom


text: Wikstroms

title: Wikstroms


text:
Czerny

Etymology
Variant of.

title: Czerny


text:
Bigbee

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Bigbee is the 29334th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 806 individuals. Bigbee is most common among White (64.76%) and Black/African American (28.91%) individuals.

title: Bigbee


text: Bigbees

title: Bigbees


text:
Цербер

Proper noun

 * 1)  Kerberos, moon of Pluto
 * 2)  Cerberus

title: Цербер


text:
Bobak

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Bobak is the 29334th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 806 individuals. Bobak is most common among White (97.27%) individuals.

title: Bobak


text: Bobaks

title: Bobaks


text:
Zhai

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Zhai is the 29334th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 806 individuals. Zhai is most common among Asian/Pacific Islander (96.77%) individuals.

title: Zhai


text: Zhais

title: Zhais


text:
Tlatelpa

Etymology
Ultimately of origin. This surname is predominantly found in the state of, in Mexico.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Tlatelpa is the 29334th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 806 individuals. Tlatelpa is most common among Hispanic/Latino (99.13%) individuals.

title: Tlatelpa


text: Tlatelpas

title: Tlatelpas


text:
Spehar

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Spehar is the 29334th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 806 individuals. Spehar is most common among White (93.18%) individuals.

title: Spehar


text: Spehars

title: Spehars


text:
Senne

Etymology

 * As a surname, spelling variant of.
 * As a surname, from.
 * As an surname, spelling variant of, from the placenames  and , both possibly from . Also from , from.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Senne is the 29334th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 806 individuals. Senne is most common among White (95.29%) individuals.

title: Senne


text: Sennes

title: Sennes


text:
Стикс

Proper noun

 * 1)  Styx, moon of Pluto
 * 2)  Styx

title: Стикс


text:
Showell

Etymology
Habitational surname from two minor places near and, both in Oxfordshire, from  +.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Showell is the 29334th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 806 individuals. Showell is most common among Black/African American (65.76%) and White (26.67%) individuals.

title: Showell


text: Showells

title: Showells


text:
Lenning

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Lenning is the 29334th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 806 individuals. Lenning is most common among White (94.54%) individuals.

title: Lenning


text: Lennings

title: Lennings


text:
Newquist

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Newquist is the 29334th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 806 individuals. Newquist is most common among White (94.17%) individuals.

title: Newquist


text: Newquists

title: Newquists


text:
Peacher

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Peacher is the 29334th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 806 individuals. Peacher is most common among White (84.37%) individuals.

title: Peacher


text: Peachers

title: Peachers


text:
Isner

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Isner is the 29334th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 806 individuals. Isner is most common among White (98.26%) individuals.

title: Isner


text: Isners

title: Isners


text:
Fugere

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Fugere is the 29334th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 806 individuals. Fugere is most common among White (95.91%) individuals.

title: Fugere


text: Fugeres

title: Fugeres


text:
Galpin

Etymology
English surname related to the verb, probably by way of. Compare.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Galpin is the 29334th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 806 individuals. Galpin is most common among White (94.17%) individuals.

title: Galpin


text: Galpins

title: Galpins


text:
Chickering

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Chickering is the 29334th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 806 individuals. Chickering is most common among White (94.17%) individuals.

title: Chickering


text: Chickerings

title: Chickerings


text:
Ehmke

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Ehmke is the 29334th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 806 individuals. Ehmke is most common among White (97.02%) individuals.

title: Ehmke


text: Ehmkes

title: Ehmkes


text:
Tallapoosa

Proper noun

 * , named after the river.
 * , named after the county in Alabama.
 * 1) the  in Georgia and Alabama, which forms the  after joining the.

title: Tallapoosa


text:
Doescher

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Doescher is the 29334th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 806 individuals. Doescher is most common among White (95.04%) individuals.

title: Doescher


text: Doeschers

title: Doeschers


text:
Buttry

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Buttry is the 29366th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 805 individuals. Buttry is most common among White (94.91%) individuals.

title: Buttry


text: Buttrys

title: Buttrys


text:
Gavina

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Gavina is the 29366th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 805 individuals. Gavina is most common among Hispanic/Latino (83.85%) and Asian/Pacific Islander (11.43%) individuals.

title: Gavina


text: Gavinas

title: Gavinas


text:
Gorelick

Etymology
Variant of.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Gorelick is the 29366th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 805 individuals. Gorelick is most common among White (95.16%) individuals.

title: Gorelick


text: Gorelicks

title: Gorelicks


text:
Hestand

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Hestand is the 29366th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 805 individuals. Hestand is most common among White (93.79%) individuals.

title: Hestand


text: Hestands

title: Hestands


text:
𐌰𐌽𐌰𐌻𐌰𐌲𐌾𐌰𐌽

Etymology
From. .

Verb

 * 1) to lay upon
 * 2) to inflict (wounds)

title: 𐌰𐌽𐌰𐌻𐌰𐌲𐌾𐌰𐌽


text:
Radle

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Radle is the 29366th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 805 individuals. Radle is most common among White (94.53%) individuals.

title: Radle


text: Radles

title: Radles


text: analagjan

title: analagjan


text:
Raczkowski

Etymology
Borrowed from and.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Raczkowski is the 29366th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 805 individuals. Raczkowski is most common among White (94.91%) individuals.

title: Raczkowski


text: Raczkowskis

title: Raczkowskis


text:
Potash

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Potash is the 29366th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 805 individuals. Potash is most common among White (96.89%) individuals.

title: Potash


text: Potashes

title: Potashes


text: 𐌰𐌽𐌰𐌻𐌰𐌲𐌾𐌰𐌽𐌳𐍃

title: 𐌰𐌽𐌰𐌻𐌰𐌲𐌾𐌰𐌽𐌳𐍃


text: 𐌰𐌽𐌰𐌻𐌰𐌲𐌾𐌰𐌽𐌳𐌰𐌽𐍃

title: 𐌰𐌽𐌰𐌻𐌰𐌲𐌾𐌰𐌽𐌳𐌰𐌽𐍃


text:
Pearlstein

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Pearlstein is the 29366th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 805 individuals. Pearlstein is most common among White (96.27%) individuals.

title: Pearlstein


text: Pearlsteins

title: Pearlsteins


text:
Pechacek

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Pechacek is the 29366th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 805 individuals. Pechacek is most common among White (97.02%) individuals.

title: Pechacek


text: Pechaceks

title: Pechaceks


text:
Milhoan

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Milhoan is the 29366th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 805 individuals. Milhoan is most common among White (95.78%) individuals.

title: Milhoan


text: Milhoans

title: Milhoans


text:
Lessley

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Lessley is the 29366th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 805 individuals. Lessley is most common among White (81.86%) individuals.

title: Lessley


text: Lessleys

title: Lessleys


text:
Lorden

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Lorden is the 29366th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 805 individuals. Lorden is most common among White (86.21%) individuals.

title: Lorden


text: Lordens

title: Lordens


text:
Mabery

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Mabery is the 29366th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 805 individuals. Mabery is most common among White (74.78%) and Black/African American (18.88%) individuals.

title: Mabery


text: Maberys

title: Maberys


text:
Massingale

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Massingale is the 29366th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 805 individuals. Massingale is most common among White (83.23%) and Black/African American (10.31%) individuals.

title: Massingale


text: Massingales

title: Massingales


text:
Mehmood

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Mehmood is the 29366th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 805 individuals. Mehmood is most common among Asian/Pacific Islander (89.07%) individuals.

title: Mehmood


text: Mehmoods

title: Mehmoods


text:
Laraway

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Laraway is the 29366th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 805 individuals. Laraway is most common among White (93.29%) individuals.

title: Laraway


text: Laraways

title: Laraways


text:
Kielty

Etymology
Anglicized form of, a personal name probably based on.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Kielty is the 29366th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 805 individuals. Kielty is most common among White (95.65%) individuals.

title: Kielty


text: Kieltys

title: Kieltys


text:
𐌻𐌰𐌲𐌾𐌰𐌽

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to lay, set, put, deposit

Inflection
A variant spelling is attested.

title: 𐌻𐌰𐌲𐌾𐌰𐌽


text:
Scarcella

Etymology
Borrowed from.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Scarcella is the 29366th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 805 individuals. Scarcella is most common among White (94.66%) individuals.

title: Scarcella


text: Scarcellas

title: Scarcellas


text: 𐌻𐌰𐌲𐌹𐌳𐌰

title: 𐌻𐌰𐌲𐌹𐌳𐌰


text: 𐌻𐌰𐌲𐌹𐌳𐌴𐍃

title: 𐌻𐌰𐌲𐌹𐌳𐌴𐍃


text: 𐌻𐌰𐌲𐌹𐌳𐌴𐌳𐌿𐌸

title: 𐌻𐌰𐌲𐌹𐌳𐌴𐌳𐌿𐌸


text:
Swindall

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Swindall is the 29366th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 805 individuals. Swindall is most common among White (81.49%) and Black/African American (12.3%) individuals.

title: Swindall


text: Swindalls

title: Swindalls


text: 𐌻𐌰𐌲𐌹𐌳𐌴𐌳𐌿𐌽

title: 𐌻𐌰𐌲𐌹𐌳𐌴𐌳𐌿𐌽


text: 𐌻𐌰𐌲𐌾𐌹𐍃

title: 𐌻𐌰𐌲𐌾𐌹𐍃


text: 𐌻𐌰𐌲𐌾𐌰

title: 𐌻𐌰𐌲𐌾𐌰


text:
Bailiff

Etymology
Occupational surname, from.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Bailiff is the 29366th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 805 individuals. Bailiff is most common among White (91.18%) individuals.

title: Bailiff


text: Bailiffs

title: Bailiffs


text: 𐌻𐌰𐌲𐌾𐌰𐌹𐍃

title: 𐌻𐌰𐌲𐌾𐌰𐌹𐍃


text: 𐌻𐌰𐌲𐌾𐌰𐌹

title: 𐌻𐌰𐌲𐌾𐌰𐌹


text: 𐌻𐌰𐌲𐌴𐌹

title: 𐌻𐌰𐌲𐌴𐌹


text:
Bartolomei

Etymology
Borrowed from.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Bartolomei is the 29366th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 805 individuals. Bartolomei is most common among White (73.17%) and Hispanic/Latino (24.84%) individuals.

Etymology
Patronymic from the personal name.

Etymology
, from, from.

title: Bartolomei


text: Bartolomeis

title: Bartolomeis


text: 𐌻𐌰𐌲𐌾𐌹𐌸

title: 𐌻𐌰𐌲𐌾𐌹𐌸


text:
Wiegman

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Wiegman is the 29366th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 805 individuals. Wiegman is most common among White (96.77%) individuals.

title: Wiegman


text: Wiegmans

title: Wiegmans


text: 𐌻𐌰𐌲𐌾𐌰𐌽𐌳𐍃

title: 𐌻𐌰𐌲𐌾𐌰𐌽𐌳𐍃


text:
Wain

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Wain is the 29366th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 805 individuals. Wain is most common among White (87.58%) individuals.

title: Wain


text: Wains

title: Wains


text: 𐌻𐌰𐌲𐌾𐌰𐌽𐌳𐌰𐌽𐍃

title: 𐌻𐌰𐌲𐌾𐌰𐌽𐌳𐌰𐌽𐍃


text:
Volpi

Etymology
Borrowed from.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Volpi is the 29366th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 805 individuals. Volpi is most common among White (94.04%) individuals.

Etymology
Patronymic of.

title: Volpi


text: Volpis

title: Volpis


text: 𐌻𐌰𐌲𐌹𐌳𐌴𐌳𐌹

title: 𐌻𐌰𐌲𐌹𐌳𐌴𐌳𐌹


text:
Volkov

Etymology
From.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Volkov is the 29366th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 805 individuals. Volkov is most common among White (96.89%) individuals.

title: Volkov


text: Volkovs

title: Volkovs


text:
Wentling

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Wentling is the 29366th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 805 individuals. Wentling is most common among White (96.4%) individuals.

title: Wentling


text: Wentlings

title: Wentlings


text:
Truslow

Etymology
Variant of.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Truslow is the 29403rd most common surname in the United States, belonging to 804 individuals. Truslow is most common among White (95.15%) individuals.

title: Truslow


text: Truslows

title: Truslows


text:
Udy

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Udy is the 29403rd most common surname in the United States, belonging to 804 individuals. Udy is most common among White (97.01%) individuals.

title: Udy


text: Udys

title: Udys


text:
Viel

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Viel is the 29403rd most common surname in the United States, belonging to 804 individuals. Viel is most common among White (72.51%), Black/African American (15.42%), and Hispanic/Latino (10.32%) individuals.

Etymology
First attested as Viel in 1840. Etymology. A relationship with 🇨🇬 is uncertain.

See also 🇨🇬.

title: Viel


text: Viels

title: Viels


text: dǎ yězhàn

title: dǎ yězhàn


text: yězhàn

title: yězhàn


text:
Bahnsen

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Bahnsen is the 29403rd most common surname in the United States, belonging to 804 individuals. Bahnsen is most common among White (94.53%) individuals.

title: Bahnsen


text: Bahnsens

title: Bahnsens


text:
Arn

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Arn is the 29403rd most common surname in the United States, belonging to 804 individuals. Arn is most common among White (95.27%) individuals.

title: Arn


text:
Arns

Etymology 1
Borrowed from.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Arns is the 37899th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 586 individuals. Arns is most common among White (89.08%) individuals.

title: Arns


text:
Suder

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Suder is the 29403rd most common surname in the United States, belonging to 804 individuals. Suder is most common among White (94.53%) individuals.

title: Suder


text: Suders

title: Suders


text:
Tauer

Etymology
Borrowed from.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Tauer is the 29403rd most common surname in the United States, belonging to 804 individuals. Tauer is most common among White (95.02%) individuals.

title: Tauer


text: Tauers

title: Tauers


text:
Skiver

Etymology
Occupation surname, from.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Skiver is the 29403rd most common surname in the United States, belonging to 804 individuals. Skiver is most common among White (94.15%) individuals.

title: Skiver


text: Skivers

title: Skivers


text:
Posłuszny

Etymology
From.

title: Posłuszny


text:
πῆμα

Etymology
From (compare 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬).

Noun

 * 1)  misery

title: πῆμα


text:
Sowden

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Sowden is the 29403rd most common surname in the United States, belonging to 804 individuals. Sowden is most common among White (94.53%) individuals.

title: Sowden


text: Sowdens

title: Sowdens


text:
Rougeau

Etymology
Borrowed from.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Rougeau is the 29403rd most common surname in the United States, belonging to 804 individuals. Rougeau is most common among White (67.04%) and Black/African American (26.87%) individuals.

title: Rougeau


text: Rougeaus

title: Rougeaus


text:
Kilburg

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Kilburg is the 29403rd most common surname in the United States, belonging to 804 individuals. Kilburg is most common among White (94.03%) individuals.

title: Kilburg


text: Kilburgs

title: Kilburgs


text:
Lege

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Lege is the 29403rd most common surname in the United States, belonging to 804 individuals. Lege is most common among White (91.67%) individuals.

title: Lege


text: Leges

title: Leges


text:
Muehlbauer

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Muehlbauer is the 29403rd most common surname in the United States, belonging to 804 individuals. Muehlbauer is most common among White (96.89%) individuals.

title: Muehlbauer


text: Muehlbauers

title: Muehlbauers


text: bìnàn

title: bìnàn


text:
Święty

Etymology
From.

title: Święty


text:
Bumanglag

Etymology
A surname of origin.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Bumanglag is the 29403rd most common surname in the United States, belonging to 804 individuals. Bumanglag is most common among Asian/Pacific Islander (85.07%) individuals.

Etymology
.

Pronunciation

Proper noun

 * , common in Ilocos Norte

Etymology
.

title: Bumanglag


text: Bumanglags

title: Bumanglags


text:
Double

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Double is the 29403rd most common surname in the United States, belonging to 804 individuals. Double is most common among White (94.9%) individuals.

Noun

 * 1)  Collectively, both the, a day race, and the , an evening race, both of which are run on  weekend Sunday. Used concerning racers who (wish[/ed/ing] to) participat[e/ed/ing] in both events, typically using a private jet to travel between Indianapolis, Indiana, after the 500 and Charlotte, North Carolina, to get to the 600.

Etymology
19th century, from.

Noun

 * 1)  stand-in, double actor who shoots certain scenes for another
 * 2) lookalike, double artist or agent who resembles and imitates a famous person
 * 3)  double the winning of two (national) competitions in one year, especially league and cup
 * 1)  double the winning of two (national) competitions in one year, especially league and cup
 * 1)  double the winning of two (national) competitions in one year, especially league and cup
 * 1)  double the winning of two (national) competitions in one year, especially league and cup
 * 1)  double the winning of two (national) competitions in one year, especially league and cup

title: Double


text: Doubles

title: Doubles


text:
Drechsler

Etymology

 * Variant of.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Drechsler is the 29422nd most common surname in the United States, belonging to 803 individuals. Drechsler is most common among White (93.4%) individuals.

Etymology
.

Etymology
From, from ; equivalent to.

Noun

 * 1) turner, lathe operator

title: Drechsler


text: Drechslers

title: Drechslers


text:
Cattell

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Cattell is the 29422nd most common surname in the United States, belonging to 803 individuals. Cattell is most common among White (93.9%) individuals.

title: Cattell


text: Cattells

title: Cattells


text:
Icenhour

Etymology
Americanized spelling of the surname.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Icenhour is the 29422nd most common surname in the United States, belonging to 803 individuals. Icenhour is most common among White (95.27%) individuals.

title: Icenhour


text: Icenhours

title: Icenhours


text:
Gillaspy

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Gillaspy is the 29422nd most common surname in the United States, belonging to 803 individuals. Gillaspy is most common among White (93.52%) individuals.

title: Gillaspy


text: Gillaspys

title: Gillaspys


text:
Paolillo

Etymology
Borrowed from.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Paolillo is the 29422nd most common surname in the United States, belonging to 803 individuals. Paolillo is most common among White (96.01%) individuals.

Etymology
From a hypocoristic form of the given name.

title: Paolillo


text: Paolillos

title: Paolillos


text:
Dobry

Etymology
Borrowed from or. .

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Dobry is the 37391st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 596 individuals. Dobry is most common among White (93.96%) individuals.

Etymology
From.

title: Dobry


text:
Renk

Etymology
North surname, from a pet from of.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Renk is the 29422nd most common surname in the United States, belonging to 803 individuals. Renk is most common among White (90.41%) individuals.

title: Renk


text: Renks

title: Renks


text:
Moneypenny

Etymology
From money and penny, originally a nickname for a miser.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Moneypenny is the 29422nd most common surname in the United States, belonging to 803 individuals. Moneypenny is most common among White (96.51%) individuals.

title: Moneypenny


text: Moneypennys

title: Moneypennys


text:
Riegle

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Riegle is the 29422nd most common surname in the United States, belonging to 803 individuals. Riegle is most common among White (95.39%) individuals.

title: Riegle


text: Riegles

title: Riegles


text:
Sturkie

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Sturkie is the 29422nd most common surname in the United States, belonging to 803 individuals. Sturkie is most common among White (86.3%) individuals.

title: Sturkie


text: Sturkies

title: Sturkies