text:
Sheely

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Sheely is the 13536th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 2241 individuals. Sheely is most common among White (84.52%) individuals.

title: Sheely


text: Sheelys

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Sheelys


text:
Vesely

Etymology
From, from.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Vesely is the 13536th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 2241 individuals. Vesely is most common among White (94.82%) individuals.

title: Vesely


text: Veselys

title: Veselys


text:
Biro

Proper noun

 * 1) A brand of ballpoint pen: see .
 * 1) A brand of ballpoint pen: see .

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Biro is the 13536th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 2241 individuals. Biro is most common among White (90.14%) individuals.

title: Biro


text:
Biros

Etymology 1
Various origins:
 * Borrowed from, a relationship surname from.
 * Borrowed from, perhaps related to the Slovak surname.
 * Borrowed from or, variants of.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Biros is the 41164th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 529 individuals. Biros is most common among White (95.84%) individuals.

title: Biros


text: Template:list:Latin script letters/kdr

title: Template:list:Latin script letters/kdr


text:
Cardozo

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Cardozo is the 13541st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 2240 individuals. Cardozo is most common among Hispanic/Latino (73.08%) and White (21.12%) individuals.

title: Cardozo


text: Cardozos

title: Cardozos


text:
Cousineau

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Cousineau is the 13541st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 2240 individuals. Cousineau is most common among White (95.8%) individuals.

title: Cousineau


text: Cousineaus

title: Cousineaus


text:
Pero

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Pero is the 13544th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 2239 individuals. Pero is most common among White (83.79%) individuals.

Etymology
From, itself from , from , from , from , related to (compare ).

title: Pero


text: Peros

title: Peros


text:
Conkle

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Conkle is the 13545th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 2238 individuals. Conkle is most common among White (91.91%) individuals.

title: Conkle


text: Conkles

title: Conkles


text:
Gehman

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Gehman is the 13545th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 2238 individuals. Gehman is most common among White (97.23%) individuals.

title: Gehman


text: Gehmans

title: Gehmans


text:
Blasingame

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Blasingame is the 13545th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 2238 individuals. Blasingame is most common among White (80.34%) and Black/African American (13.49%) individuals.

title: Blasingame


text: Blasingames

title: Blasingames


text:
Waldner

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Waldner is the 13545th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 2238 individuals. Waldner is most common among White (97.32%) individuals.

title: Waldner


text: Waldners

title: Waldners


text: Module:R:Perseus/collision-data/LS/documentation


text:
Vallone

Etymology
Borrowed from.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Vallone is the 13551st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 2237 individuals. Vallone is most common among White (95.53%) individuals.

Etymology
From.

title: Vallone


text: Vallones

title: Vallones


text: Module:R:Perseus/collision-data/LSJ/documentation


text: Module:R:Perseus/collision-data/ML/documentation


text:
Threlkeld

Etymology
The place name is from +.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Threlkeld is the 13551st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 2237 individuals. Threlkeld is most common among White (86.54%) individuals.

title: Threlkeld


text: Threlkelds

title: Threlkelds


text:
Hornbuckle

Etymology
Variant of.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Hornbuckle is the 13551st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 2237 individuals. Hornbuckle is most common among White (72.02%) and Black/African American (17.61%) individuals.

title: Hornbuckle


text: Hornbuckles

title: Hornbuckles


text:
Jaco

Etymology
Various etymologies:
 * or
 * or
 * or

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Jaco is the 13551st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 2237 individuals. Jaco is most common among White (69.51%) and Hispanic/Latino (22.71%) individuals.

title: Jaco


text: Jacos

title: Jacos


text: Module:R:Perseus/collision-data/PECS/documentation


text: Module:R:Perseus/collision-data/Slater/documentation


text:
Finck

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Finck is the 13551st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 2237 individuals. Finck is most common among White (96.07%) individuals.

title: Finck


text: Fincks

title: Fincks


text: Module:R:Perseus/collision-data/TDAR/documentation


text:
Flanary

Etymology
Variant of.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Flanary is the 13551st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 2237 individuals. Flanary is most common among White (94.1%) individuals.

title: Flanary


text: Flanarys

title: Flanarys


text: Module:R:Perseus/collision-data/Zoega/documentation


text:
Cleghorn

Etymology
Habitational surname from.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Cleghorn is the 13551st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 2237 individuals. Cleghorn is most common among White (87.48%) individuals.

title: Cleghorn


text: Cleghorns

title: Cleghorns


text:
Mitcham

Proper noun

 * , seat of the city of the same name.
 * 1) The,.
 * 1) The,.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Mitcham is the 13551st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 2237 individuals. Mitcham is most common among White (84.09%) individuals.

title: Mitcham


text: Mitchams

title: Mitchams


text: Module:sac-decl/documentation

title: Module:sac-decl/documentation


text:
Lapinski

Etymology
Borrowed from.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Lapinski is the 13551st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 2237 individuals. Lapinski is most common among White (97.27%) individuals.

title: Lapinski


text: Lapinskis

title: Lapinskis


text: Template:list:Latin script letters/kek

title: Template:list:Latin script letters/kek


text: Category:Fox modules

title: Category:Fox modules


text:
Lape

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Lape is the 13551st most common surname in the United States, belonging to 2237 individuals. Lape is most common among White (92.31%) individuals.

title: Lape


text: Lapes

title: Lapes


text:
Kneeland

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Kneeland is the 13564th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 2236 individuals. Kneeland is most common among White (85.6%) individuals.

title: Kneeland


text: Kneelands

title: Kneelands


text:
Pradhan

Etymology
Borrowed from.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Pradhan is the 13564th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 2236 individuals. Pradhan is most common among Asian/Pacific Islander (92.98%) individuals.

title: Pradhan


text: Pradhans

title: Pradhans


text:
Brownlow

Etymology
From +.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Brownlow is the 13564th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 2236 individuals. Brownlow is most common among White (68.96%) and Black/African American (25.36%) individuals.

title: Brownlow


text: Brownlows

title: Brownlows


text:
Spahn

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Spahn is the 13569th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 2235 individuals. Spahn is most common among White (93.42%) individuals.

title: Spahn


text: Spahns

title: Spahns


text:
Umberger

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Umberger is the 13569th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 2235 individuals. Umberger is most common among White (97.54%) individuals.

title: Umberger


text: Umbergers

title: Umbergers


text:
Boler

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Boler is the 13572nd most common surname in the United States, belonging to 2234 individuals. Boler is most common among White (51.43%) and Black/African American (42.39%) individuals.

title: Boler


text: Bolers

title: Bolers


text: Module:typing-aids/data/ae/documentation


text: Module:typing-aids/data/got/documentation


text:
Tocco

Etymology
Borrowed from.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Tocco is the 13572nd most common surname in the United States, belonging to 2234 individuals. Tocco is most common among White (96.24%) individuals.

Proper noun

 * 1) a noble family from Naples
 * 1) a noble family from Naples

title: Tocco


text: Toccos

title: Toccos


text:
Dreiling

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Dreiling is the 13572nd most common surname in the United States, belonging to 2234 individuals. Dreiling is most common among White (93.87%) individuals.

Noun

 * 1) three pfennig coin

title: Dreiling


text: Dreilings

title: Dreilings


text: Module:typing-aids/data/hy/documentation


text: Module:typing-aids/data/peo/documentation


text:
Palmquist

Etymology
Borrowed from, from +.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Palmquist is the 13578th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 2233 individuals. Palmquist is most common among White (95.21%) individuals.

title: Palmquist


text: Palmquists

title: Palmquists


text:
Hosler

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Hosler is the 13578th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 2233 individuals. Hosler is most common among White (93.78%) individuals.

title: Hosler


text: Hoslers

title: Hoslers


text: Template:list:Cyrillic script letters/ket


text: Module:typing-aids/data/sa/documentation


text:
Gravel

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Gravel is the 13583rd most common surname in the United States, belonging to 2232 individuals. Gravel is most common among White (95.39%) individuals.

title: Gravel


text: Gravels

title: Gravels


text:
Dombroski

Etymology
Americanized spelling of.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Dombroski is the 13583rd most common surname in the United States, belonging to 2232 individuals. Dombroski is most common among White (96.73%) individuals.

title: Dombroski


text: Dombroskis

title: Dombroskis


text:
Reiman

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Reiman is the 13583rd most common surname in the United States, belonging to 2232 individuals. Reiman is most common among White (95.39%) individuals.

title: Reiman


text: Reimans

title: Reimans


text:
Laforge

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Laforge is the 13588th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 2231 individuals. Laforge is most common among White (87.18%) individuals.

title: Laforge


text: Laforges

title: Laforges


text: Module:yi-headword/documentation

title: Module:yi-headword/documentation


text:
Gratton

Etymology
From +.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Gratton is the 13588th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 2231 individuals. Gratton is most common among White (87.4%) individuals.

title: Gratton


text: Grattons

title: Grattons


text: Module:yi-adjective/documentation

title: Module:yi-adjective/documentation


text:
Salvato

Etymology
Borrowed from.

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Salvato is the 13588th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 2231 individuals. Salvato is most common among White (92.56%) individuals.

Etymology
From.

title: Salvato


text: Salvatos

title: Salvatos


text:
cerbatanero

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) one who uses a blowgun or blowpipe

title: cerbatanero


text: Module:yi-common/documentation

title: Module:yi-common/documentation


text:
Borntreger

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Borntreger is the 13588th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 2231 individuals. Borntreger is most common among White (99.46%) individuals.

title: Borntreger


text: Borntregers

title: Borntregers


text: Module:ms-derivations/affix-summary/documentation


text:
Bober

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Bober is the 13593rd most common surname in the United States, belonging to 2230 individuals. Bober is most common among White (93.68%) individuals.

Etymology
From.

title: Bober


text: Bobers

title: Bobers


text: Module:mkh-mvi/documentation

title: Module:mkh-mvi/documentation


text:
Phu

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Phu is the 13593rd most common surname in the United States, belonging to 2230 individuals. Phu is most common among Asian/Pacific Islander (96.59%) individuals.

title: Phu


text: Phus

title: Phus


text: Category:Middle Vietnamese modules

title: Category:Middle Vietnamese modules


text:
Ealey

Statistics

 * According to the 2010 United States Census, Ealey is the 13597th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 2229 individuals. Ealey is most common among Black/African American (50.92%) and White (43.83%) individuals.

title: Ealey


text: Ealeys

title: Ealeys


text: Module:mul-letter/documentation

title: Module:mul-letter/documentation


text: Module:mul-letter/data/documentation

title: Module:mul-letter/data/documentation


text:
Reconstruction:Proto-Germanic/leusaną

Etymology
From, from.

Verb

 * 1) to lose, to cease to have

title: Reconstruction:Proto-Germanic/leusaną


text: Module:niv-translit/documentation

title: Module:niv-translit/documentation


text: Category:Nivkh modules

title: Category:Nivkh modules


text: Template:list:Latin script letters/kgp

title: Template:list:Latin script letters/kgp


text: Module:nrf-headword/documentation

title: Module:nrf-headword/documentation


text: Module:non-cell/documentation

title: Module:non-cell/documentation


text: Module:osx-conj/data/documentation

title: Module:osx-conj/data/documentation


text: Module:osx-decl-adj/documentation

title: Module:osx-decl-adj/documentation


text:
Module:enm-conj/documentation

Called by, , and. Do not use directly.

title: Module:enm-conj/documentation


text: Module:egl-adj/data/documentation

title: Module:egl-adj/data/documentation


text:
色づく

Verb

 * 1) to change color; to turn color
 * 2) to be imbued with a color
 * 3) to redden; to become red or become more red
 * 4) to ripen
 * 5) to grow ripe; to become ripe
 * 6) to cause to ripen; to induce ripening
 * 1) to grow ripe; to become ripe
 * 2) to cause to ripen; to induce ripening

title: 色づく


text: Module:bo-registers/data/documentation

title: Module:bo-registers/data/documentation


text: Module:R:Perseus/collision-data/EL/documentation


text:
bahaar

Etymology
From.

Adverb

 * 1) outside

title: bahaar


text: Category:Caribbean Hindustani lemmas

title: Category:Caribbean Hindustani lemmas


text:
offentliggøre

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) announce, publish, make public

title: offentliggøre


text: offentliggør

title: offentliggør


text: Category:Caribbean Hindustani language

title: Category:Caribbean Hindustani language


text: offentliggørende

title: offentliggørende


text: Category:Caribbean Hindustani adverbs

title: Category:Caribbean Hindustani adverbs


text: いろづく

title: いろづく


text: offentliggøren

title: offentliggøren


text: offentliggøres

title: offentliggøres


text:
Module:grc-headword/documentation

This module generates the content of many :, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,.

This module tracks the monophthongs without macrons, breves, circumflexes, or iota subscripts (◌̄, ◌̆, ◌͂, ◌ͅ) with the tracking template, so that length can be marked as policy requires, and it categorizes all Ancient Greek words into categories for accent type, such as.

Experimentation on new features is done in Module:grc-headword/sandbox.

title: Module:grc-headword/documentation


text: Module:grc-appendix/documentation

title: Module:grc-appendix/documentation


text: Category:Caribbean Hindustani nouns

title: Category:Caribbean Hindustani nouns


text: 色付く

title: 色付く


text: dark lights

title: dark lights


text: Module:khb-headword/documentation

title: Module:khb-headword/documentation


text: Module:khb-pron/documentation

title: Module:khb-pron/documentation


text: Module:ki-headword/documentation

title: Module:ki-headword/documentation


text: Module:lg-utilities/documentation

title: Module:lg-utilities/documentation


text: Category:Luganda modules

title: Category:Luganda modules


text: Template:list:Cyrillic script letters/kim


text: Module:jra-headword/documentation

title: Module:jra-headword/documentation


text: Module:jbo/data/documentation

title: Module:jbo/data/documentation


text: Module:iu-headword/documentation

title: Module:iu-headword/documentation


text: Module:iu-spel/documentation

title: Module:iu-spel/documentation


text: Template:iu-spel/documentation

title: Template:iu-spel/documentation


text: Category:Inuktitut form-of templates

title: Category:Inuktitut form-of templates


text: Template:list:Latin script letters/kjh

title: Template:list:Latin script letters/kjh


text:
offentliggørelse

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) announcement; the act of announcing, publishing, making public

title: offentliggørelse


text: offentliggørelsen

title: offentliggørelsen


text: offentliggørelser

title: offentliggørelser


text: offentliggørelserne

title: offentliggørelserne


text: offentliggørelsernes

title: offentliggørelsernes


text: offentliggørelses

title: offentliggørelses


text: offentliggørelsens

title: offentliggørelsens


text: offentliggørelsers

title: offentliggørelsers


text:
Reconstruction:Proto-Germanic/ulbanduz

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) camel

title: Reconstruction:Proto-Germanic/ulbanduz


text: Template:list:Cyrillic script letters/kjh


text:
попользоваться

Verb

 * 1) to use, to utilize for some time

title: попользоваться


text:
помечтать

Verb

 * 1) to dream for some time

title: помечтать


text:
понадеяться

Verb

 * 1) to hope

title: понадеяться


text:
cível

Etymology
, from. .

Adjective

 * 1) civil related to civil law

title: cível


text:
скостить

Verb

 * 1)  to strike off (debt), to knock off (price)

title: скостить


text: meldtes

title: meldtes


text:
раскостить

Verb

 * 1)  to scold, to berate, to lambast, to chide

title: раскостить


text:
meldepligt

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) the duty to report something
 * 2) the duty to report at some place (e.g. to ensure that one is available for service, or that one is at a particular place)
 * 1) the duty to report at some place (e.g. to ensure that one is available for service, or that one is at a particular place)
 * 1) the duty to report at some place (e.g. to ensure that one is available for service, or that one is at a particular place)
 * 1) the duty to report at some place (e.g. to ensure that one is available for service, or that one is at a particular place)
 * 1) the duty to report at some place (e.g. to ensure that one is available for service, or that one is at a particular place)

title: meldepligt


text: meldepligten

title: meldepligten


text: meldepligter

title: meldepligter


text: meldepligterne

title: meldepligterne


text: meldepligts

title: meldepligts


text: meldepligtens

title: meldepligtens


text: meldepligters

title: meldepligters


text: meldepligternes

title: meldepligternes


text:
означить

Verb

 * 1)  to mean, to signify
 * 2)  to stand for, to represent, to betoken, to denote

title: означить


text: Template:list:Cyrillic script letters/kjj


text:
meldesystem

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) reporting system

title: meldesystem


text: meldesystemet

title: meldesystemet


text: meldesystemer

title: meldesystemer


text: meldesystemerne

title: meldesystemerne


text: meldesystems

title: meldesystems


text: meldesystemets

title: meldesystemets


text: meldesystemers

title: meldesystemers


text: meldesystemernes

title: meldesystemernes


text: dāochā

title: dāochā


text: Mollett

title: Mollett


text: luòhuāshēng

title: luòhuāshēng


text: luòhuā

title: luòhuā


text: meldingerne

title: meldingerne


text: meldingens

title: meldingens


text: meldingers

title: meldingers


text: meldingernes

title: meldingernes


text: qiānlǐ zhī xíng, shǐyú zú xià

title: qiānlǐ zhī xíng, shǐyú zú xià


text: zhuójiàn

title: zhuójiàn


text: qǐzhǐ

title: qǐzhǐ


text: 豈只

title: 豈只


text: 岂只

title: 岂只


text:
tawial

Etymology
From, formed by /. Compare 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) maize, corn, kernels of shelled corn

title: tawial


text: rúshàng

title: rúshàng


text: kāitáng

title: kāitáng


text: Jiékè

title: Jiékè


text: Qiáozhì

title: Qiáozhì


text: tóudì

title: tóudì


text: kānglè

title: kānglè


text: chíxiè

title: chíxiè


text: tummana

title: tummana


text: 陆桥

title: 陆桥


text: lùqiáo

title: lùqiáo


text:
shilut

Etymology
Compare 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) small, immature, green ear of corn.

title: shilut


text:
肥缺

Noun

 * 1) lucrative post

title: 肥缺


text:
匪穴

Noun

 * 1) bandit's lair; enemy's entrenchment; rebel stronghold

title: 匪穴


text:
菲薄

Adjective

 * 1) humble; poor
 * 2) meager; scant

Verb

 * 1) to belittle; to despise

title: 菲薄


text: ampumalinja

title: ampumalinja


text:
廢料

Noun

 * 1) waste material; waste; scrap
 * 2)  good-for-nothing; useless individual
 * 1)  good-for-nothing; useless individual

title: 廢料


text:
分冊

Noun

 * 1) separately published part of a book; fascicle

title: 分冊


text:
分界

Noun

 * 1) dividing line; line of demarcation

Verb

 * 1) to have as the boundary; to be demarcated by

title: 分界


text:
粉刷

Verb

 * 1) to whitewash
 * 2)  to plaster

title: 粉刷


text:
豐登

Verb

 * 1) to have a bumper harvest; to have a plentiful harvest

title: 豐登


text:
豐美

Adjective

 * 1) lush; abundant and prosperous

title: 豐美


text:
封條

Noun

 * 1) strip of paper used for sealing ; paper strip seal

title: 封條


text:
縫隙

Noun

 * 1) crack; crevice; chink

title: 縫隙


text:
ampumahalli

Noun

 * 1) shooting hall

title: ampumahalli


text:
扶掖

Verb

 * 1)  to lend an arm to support somebody; to support with one's hand
 * 2)  to support; to help

Synonyms

title: 扶掖


text: 缝隙

title: 缝隙


text: 封条

title: 封条


text: 丰美

title: 丰美


text: 丰登

title: 丰登


text: 分册

title: 分册


text: 废料

title: 废料


text:
bumali

Verb

 * 1) hit
 * 2) kill

Etymology
From ⟨tl⟩.

Verb

 * 1) to break (something elongated, such as pencils, sticks, etc.)
 * 2) to fracture (a bone)

title: bumali


text:
mulkit

Etymology
Compare 🇨🇬. Perhaps from or.

Noun

 * 1) small, not fully grown ear of corn.

title: mulkit


text:
ampumakilpailu

Noun

 * 1) shooting competition

title: ampumakilpailu


text:
свёртывание

Noun

 * 1) rolling up
 * 2) curtailment
 * 3) coagulation

title: свёртывание


text: свертывание

title: свертывание


text:
ampumataito

Noun

 * 1) shooting skill, marksmanship

title: ampumataito


text:
ulut

Etymology
Compare 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) corncob (cob with no kernels).

title: ulut


text:
кушанье

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) dish, meal, food

title: кушанье


text:
bắt chước

Etymology
🇰🇲.

Verb

 * 1) to imitate, to mimic

title: bắt chước


text:
слепок

Noun

 * 1) mould, cast

title: слепок


text:
стойло

Noun

 * 1) A horse stall or stable (box)

title: стойло


text:
ampumakunto

Noun

 * 1) The state of being fit for shooting.

title: ampumakunto


text:
Reconstruction:Proto-West Germanic/bifelhan

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to recommend, advise
 * 2) to entrust, confide
 * 3)  to hide, bury
 * 4)  to order, command


text:
復刊

Verb

 * 1) to resume publication

title: 復刊


text:
賦性

Noun

 * 1) inborn nature

title: 賦性


text:
ant cricket

Noun

 * 1) Any of various small insects of the family  that live commensally with ants.

title: ant cricket


text:
覆滅

Verb

 * 1) to be destroyed; to collapse

title: 覆滅


text: ant crickets

title: ant crickets


text:
副刊

Noun

 * 1) supplement

title: 副刊


text:
俯就

Verb

 * 1)  to condescend to accept
 * 2) to adapt oneself to; to make the best of; to make do with

title: 俯就


text:
俯衝

Verb

 * 1)  to dive; to nosedive

title: 俯衝


text:
လီ

Adjective

 * 1) in installments: in parts.

Etymology 1
From. Cognates include 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) air

Etymology 2
From. Cognates include 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) leech

Etymology 3
From. Cognates include 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) grandchild

Etymology
Compare 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1) to lie

Etymology
, from, from. Cognate with 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) air

Etymology 1
From. Cognate with 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, or, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Adjective

 * 1) good

Etymology 2
From. Cognate with 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬 or, 🇨🇬; Compare 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) gallbladder; bile.

title: လီ


text:
浮華

Adjective

 * 1) showy; ostentatious; flashy

title: 浮華


text:
浮塵

Noun

 * 1) floating dust; surface dust

title: 浮塵


text: Category:Shan adjectives

title: Category:Shan adjectives


text:
服刑

Verb

 * 1)  to serve a sentence

title: 服刑


text:
服帖

Adjective

 * 1) docile; obedient; submissive
 * 2) appropriate; fitting; well arranged
 * 3) comfortable; at ease; content

title: 服帖


text:
伏法

Verb

 * 1)  to be executed; to be put to death

title: 伏法


text:
伏筆

Noun

 * 1) foreshadowing; hint foreshadowing later developments in a story

title: 伏筆


text: 复刊

title: 复刊


text: 赋性

title: 赋性


text: 覆灭

title: 覆灭


text: 俯冲

title: 俯冲


text: 浮华

title: 浮华


text: 浮尘

title: 浮尘


text: 伏笔

title: 伏笔


text:
Talk:density

RFV discussion: August 2016–May 2017
Rfv-sense "The ratio of one quantity to another quantity." with the usex "The number of particles per unit volume of a specified volume can be considered to be the particle density for the specified volume." Tagged but not listed. - -sche (discuss) 23:40, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

 * It sounds like sense 1, but is the distinction the fact that sense 1 talks about "matter", whereas some particles are massless?! Equinox ◑ 23:49, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

 * I think the difference is that sense 1 is mass divided by volume, whereas sense 2 can be some other ratio (in the usex, it's number of particles divided by volume). I've added three quotations to support sense 2. I think it could probably be rephrased to be more specific—maybe something like "A measure of some quantity per unit space"? —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 01:29, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
 * But it's not necessarily in space. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 23:55, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

 * RFV passed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 23:55, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Can it also mean stupidity?
...like the adjective sense at. Equinox ◑ 07:49, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

 * I would say denseness for that sense, but density also exists:      . Seems to be dated. I'll add it to the entry. —Granger (talk · contribs) 03:57, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

title: Talk:density


text:
Talk:AACFO

RFV discussion: August 2016–May 2017
As was noted in Feedback, there doesn't seem to be any evidence for this outside of dictionaries. Chuck Entz (talk) 21:05, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I found some mentions of the AACFO in local newspapers:
 * 1979: https://www.newspapers.com/newspage/149456503
 * 2002: https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=z3giAAAAIBAJ&sjid=Aa0FAAAAIBAJ&pg=6134%2C521617
 * According to the 2002 source they were founded in 1978. Unfortunately local papers tend not to research their stories very well, and in any case it's impossible to determine whether they actually still existed in 2002. I suspect this organisation, if it existed in a meaningful way, was a bit of a one day fly.
 * I doubt this is enough attestation though, and I haven't found even a single mention of the abbreviation AACFO used for this association.

 * RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 08:01, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:AACFO


text:
Talk:bald

RFV discussion: September 2016–May 2017
"Of a statement: empirically unsupported." I have just added and cited another sense ("Of a statement or account: unembellished") and I wonder if this was a confused attempt at that. Or does it exist independently? Equinox ◑ 16:23, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

 * The definition could be revised a bit (to be more like "without evidence or support being provided"), but I think it exists:,.
 * 2006, Alastair Fowler, How to Write, page 49:
 * Many continue with bald assertion after bald assertion; which is unlikely to convince people, unless they agree with you already.
 * - -sche (discuss) 17:14, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
 * I have made the proposed revision, and added some citations. With the revision, however, that second definition looks a lot like a subset of the first. Kiwima (talk) 20:53, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

 * Thanks; but why is the "bald assertion" in the 1994 citation sense 3 and not sense 4? Equinox ◑ 21:15, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

 * It seems like that citation blends both senses, or could be either (and is not definitively not one or the other). Perhaps it is best moved to the citations page. - -sche (discuss) 21:33, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

 * I'm more familiar with the "without support" sense than the "without embellishment" sense. The senses seem to be separate, though; e.g. a xenophobic rant that immigrants are more likely to commit theft and rape and assault, going into lurid/scary detail, seems like it could be "bald" in sense 2 (without evidence being provided), not sense 1 (lacking embellishment). But if you think it's better as a subsense, OK. - -sche (discuss) 21:33, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

 * RFV passed. It can still be made into a subsense if anyone feels the need to do so. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 22:33, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Etymology
The English etymology seems unable to decide on whether the word is from PIE or from ! (No, they are not the same root by any means.) If hypotheses conflict, either delete the uncertain information and move it to an ancestor, and detail the hypotheses there; or, as I prefer, just list and clearly distinguish both hypotheses on this page. Otherwise, if anyone is aware of which hypothesis is considered to be the stronger or prevalent one, please note that and remove the irrelevant, conflicting information. If no one responds to this within the next couple of days I'll try to do it myself. — Jaspet 15:03, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

title: Talk:bald


text:
Talk:angelling

RFV discussion: October 2016–May 2017
"1. A small or inferior angel. 2. Anything dear, yet petty." No hits for angellings plural in Google Books. The entry has one cite for each supposed sense, but the first one seems like a nonce-word verb ("angelling" = doing the work of angels) and the second also looks verb-like, and seems to bear no relation to the claimed definition. Equinox ◑ 22:13, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
 * The second is a verbing of 'angel investor'. (Minor annoyance: journalist named Angel Ling)
 * "It ends with Snooki spraying herself in ketchup and snow-angelling on Sitch's bed." Cinema Blend
 * "That, it seems to me, is exactly the point we need to understand about epiphanies, angelling, and the message which arrive from non-ordinary and parallel realities." GBC Dolphin's Leap, Hind's Feet: Becoming a Mystic: Journey, Discipline and Practice perhaps an epiphanous experience.
 * "Nimbus rolled his eyes at this trite lesson from Good Angelling 101." GBC Trouble with Angels verb of being an angel.
 * "Or maybe they just don't think Grandma needs any angel-ling when she has this devoted family." GBC Have The Men Had Enough? verb of being like an angel.
 * - Amgine/t·e 03:41, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
 * The "Snooki" cite is from snow angel pressed into service as a verb. It's not evidence of angelling at all. Chuck Entz (talk) 04:01, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
 * <confused look> That seems to me to be an arbitrary level of precision, since any specific angel type might be verbed, such as the angel investor(ing), just as angel itself might be. I had another cite for "snow angelling" - in effect, the same as Good Angelling below it. However, none of my cites were intended to support the adjectival use in the article. They were intended to show that it is used as a verb and noun, but not as claimed in the existing definitions. - Amgine/t·e 17:28, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

 * I mainly RFVed this because I don't think the supposed definitions have got any link whatsoever to the intended meaning of the cited writers. Equinox ◑ 21:07, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Yeah it was a mistake by myself. Once I read it as a verb, it was clear that that is what it was. Leasnam (talk) 02:01, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

 * RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 22:14, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:angelling


text:
Talk:antigonorrhoeic

RFV discussion: October 2016–May 2017
Not seeing the noun anywhere. Equinox ◑ 01:28, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

 * Not verified the book is real, but:
 * 1915 The Art of Dispensing Ninth Edition (Revised And Enlarged.), Peter MacEwan, The Chemist And Druggist
 * "Arhovin A yellowish liquid, a compound of diphenylamine and thymol benzoic ethyl ester, used as an antigonorrhoeic."
 * - Amgine/t·e 20:27, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

 * More than enough at to mark this as RFV passed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 22:16, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:antigonorrhoeic


text:
Talk:apareon

RFV discussion: October 2016–May 2017
"The point in an orbit around Mars that is most distant from that planet." Only in word lists? Equinox ◑ 01:40, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
 * There are a few discussions on Usenet about the equivalent terms to apogee and perigee for various planets and other heavenly bodies, but they're all mentions. There's also a mention in a dictionary of space terminology in Books. Google Scholar has one good cite, which is probably durably-archived (most journals are). There are more cites there for apoareion, though- that looks like it may be the only attestable spelling. Chuck Entz (talk) 03:09, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

 * Mostly I find mentions, but here is one use. Kiwima (talk) 16:29, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

 * RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 22:18, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:apareon


text:
Talk:years young

RFV discussion: October 2016–May 2017
Tagged, not listed. Equinox ◑ 08:07, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I think it should be an idiom, and easy enough to verify. DonnanZ (talk) 08:55, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Clear widespread use? I don't think it's a noun but that's not an RFV issue. Renard Migrant (talk) 11:08, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

 * Move to RFD? I thought we previously removed this sense from young, but maybe it was just a TR discussion. Equinox ◑ 11:11, 15 October 2016 (UTC)'

 * years young gets plenty of google books results https://www.google.com/search?tbm=bks&q=%22years+young%22 it's used as a euphemism for saying "years old" in order to avoid saying the word "old". 99.101.56.68 17:03, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Shouldn't it be at ? The euphemism is not on the entire phrase, but on young as meaning "old". In fact, trying to determine a correct POS for this evinces the fact that it's not a valid phrase in and of itself. When one says "He is 85 years young", it's correct to segment this as "He is 85 years" + "young", and not "He is 85" + "years young"...I mean, we don't have an entry for  do we ?Leasnam (talk) 17:15, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

 * Clearly citable, so RFV passed. I have sent it to RFD. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 20:25, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

RFD discussion: May–August 2017
Idiomatic or an SOP joke? —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 20:25, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I believe it's a play on the word young, meaning "old". One is [x years] + [young/old]; not [x] + [years young/old]. delete per nom, and put a new sense at which states can mean "old" euphemistically Leasnam (talk) 20:51, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
 * If someone is called 70 years young, it could be a euphemism or flattery or it could be that the person is being simply described as young ("as if young, youthful") for their age. DCDuring (talk) 01:07, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Good point. So "[70 years] [young]" would essentially mean "[70 years] [of age]" but would connote "[70 years] [of (youthful) age] ? Leasnam (talk) 03:56, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
 * This seems supported by how the phrase seems to have evolved in the first place, for if we trace x years old (and incidentally its mutated offspring x years young, which is just the same phrase with a twist), we find Middle English x yeres of eld(e) ("x years of age") and finally our x years old. So the old and hence the young refer to "age" Leasnam (talk) 04:14, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

 * It's not a joke entry, just a humorous phrase. See . It's like saying "he was 5 feet short" instead of "tall": it comically draws attention to failed expectations or what not. I'm not sure that dictionary entries are the best way to cover this sort of language feature. Equinox ◑ 04:03, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

 * I don't know if we need to expand young to address this or if the entry already addresses this adequately simply by defining "young", but delete "years young" because it's just [years] [young], not [years young], like "5 feet tall" or "5 feet short" are not using *"feet tall" or *"feet short". I can find babies referred to as "n months young", btw. - -sche (discuss) 03:16, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Possibly also redirect to young, if there is an appropriate specific sense. I'm not sure that young is unique, but it may well be an example of a rare phenomenon in English, which would make a definition that captured the phenmenon lexical material. DCDuring (talk) 16:06, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

 * Keep: Largely on the basis that "young" meaning "old" is indeed a joke (though a widespread one), and also that it doesn't have much use beyond years young. Since there is no corresponding definition for young, SOP cannot be invoked. Pur ple back pack 89   16:10, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep, and expand to note that it is usually used to indicate that a person of advanced age is more active or youthful than their age alone would suggest. bd2412 T 17:07, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. DonnanZ (talk) 02:13, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete, per above. It's just irony Leasnam (talk) 02:15, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep per bd2412. Andrew Sheedy (talk) 04:47, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep It is an ironic phrase which is not sum of parts. John Cross (talk) 05:02, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Leaning towards keep, per 's comment. It wouldn't be terrible if an appropriate sense of young were added and years young redirected to it, but it would be odd unless there are other fixed phrases in which this sense of young is used. I don't like that years young is a fragment of a phrase such as 70 years young, but as of yet there is no way to indicate an unspecified number in an entry name as there is for pronouns (on one's own account), so the entry name has to be a fragment. — Eru·tuon 05:40, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Isn't the sense of "young" used here the usual sense of "young", i.e. already present in the entry, selected to flip the ? Compare "18 months young" (instead of "18 months old"), "eight feet narrow" (instead of "eight feet wide"), or The Complete McAuslan, page 227, "If he had been eight feet tall, or three feet short, I'd have thought the same thing – simply, that he would have looked out of place in a Highland regimental pipe-band." - -sche (discuss) 19:15, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Which sense of young are you referring to? "Born not long ago", "having qualities of a young person", "belonging to the earlier part of life", "inexperienced"? Those don't really lend themselves to being qualified by "some number of years". For instance, "70 years born not long ago" doesn't make sense. There really needs to be another sense, or at least a subsense. Could you explain what you mean by markedness? I'm familiar with it as a general linguistic concept, but I don't quite understand how it applies here. — Eru·tuon 19:26, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * What I mean by markedness is that the usual phrase is "X years old" or "how old are you", or "X feet tall", because "old" and "tall" are unmarked... but one could intentionally used the marked words, "X years young" or "how young are you" or "X feet short", to suggest (seriously or humorously) that instead of being advanced in age or height, someone is not advanced in age or height. - -sche (discuss) 20:09, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Ƿidsiþ 12:47, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. --WikiTiki89 19:52, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

 * FWIW, I have created decades young, which should have as much or as little claim to being separate from young as years young. - -sche (discuss) 20:09, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

 * RFD kept per no consensus for deletion: 5.5:6 (keep:delete). --Dan Polansky (talk) 16:52, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:years young


text:
Talk:gynonym

RFV discussion: October 2016–May 2017
Plausible, but I can only find scannos for synonym. Equinox ◑ 22:22, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

 * There are several versions of a biographical profile out there with the clause "Assuming the gynonym Anna Snegina..." (i.e. feminine pen name). AnonMoos (talk) 03:24, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

 * I can see it on the Web but I don't think that meets our WT:CFI criteria. Equinox ◑ 03:26, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

 * RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 20:31, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:gynonym


text:
Talk:archchancellory

RFV discussion: November 2016–May 2017
Appears in one Wikipedia article (not a particularly compelling source) and nowhere else online. Equinox ◑ 19:03, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
 * RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 22:21, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:archchancellory


text:
Talk:spirit cooking

RFV discussion: November 2016–May 2017
This is what you get when you take a work of performance art by Marina Abramović called "Spirit Cooking", and make a generic term out of it. As far as I can find on Google Books and Google Scholar, there are's nothing but a few mentions of Marina Abramović and her work and an odd assortment of coincidental occurences of the two words together.

On Google Groups there are some bizarre recent discussions about an email invitation that John Podesta received related to the performance piece- something that was misinterpreted as evidence that Hillary Clinton's campaign staff were practicing satanic rituals!

Unless this can be shown to be a lower-case term for something other than Marina Abramović's performance-art piece and meeting the definition in the entry, this should be deleted as encyclopedic and misleading. Chuck Entz (talk) 02:28, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

 * I wish I could unsee some of what I just saw. But...
 * 1996, Samuel, Spirit Cooking: With Essential Aphrodisiac Recipes, Samuel
 * No previews of this text were available, so no clue if this may be relevant.
 * 2013, Ross Fardon, This Could Be Your Future, Xlibris, pg 127
 * They set up their brass spirit cooking stoves in the aisle.
 * 2013, Marie Azzopardi-Alexander and Albert Borg, Maltese, Routledge, pg 351
 * spiritiera: 'spirit cooking stove'
 * 1966, Almqvist Ake Erik Alexander and Boij Karl Oskar Arne, Apparatus for burning spirit and similar liquid fuels US 3290907 A, United States Patents
 * FIG. 1 shows in sectional elevation a combination spirit cooking and heating stove incorporating the invention;
 * …but no evidence of the odd performance art. (Many references also to spirit cooker, spirit stove, but these refer to a spirit cooking stove and not some divisible adjective or activity. But this should be an RFD, not RFV, no? - Amgine/t·e 07:20, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

 * I don't think any of this attests the sense in question, but rather a different sense, that would be SOP. RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 23:28, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:spirit cooking


text:
Talk:vapourescence

RFV discussion: November 2016–May 2017
I don't think this spelling is legit. Equinox ◑ 18:33, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
 * RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 23:24, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:vapourescence


text:
Talk:veneerist

RFV discussion: November 2016–May 2017
Trading name of an Irish business, but I can't see generic usage. Equinox ◑ 19:01, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
 * RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 23:25, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:veneerist


text:
Talk:woodnewer

RFV discussion: November 2016–May 2017
Can't find anything on this at all. Could it be a typo for woodhewer, a bird listed in some other dictionaries? Equinox ◑ 23:51, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

RFV-failed Kiwima (talk) 20:20, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:woodnewer


text:
Talk:coorne

RFV discussion: November 2016–May 2017
the whole entry. everything. Leasnam (talk) 01:46, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I did a substantial amount of pruning. The contributor basically copied just about everything verbatim from crown, then changed all the instances of "crown" to "coorne"- even in the quotes. If this exists in English (as opposed to Middle English), it's just an obsolete form of crown, so I got rid of almost everything else. I'm not sure what to do with the pronunciation section, since that wasn't copied from crown, but the pronunciations seem odd for an English term. Chuck Entz (talk) 04:55, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I agree, especially in regard to the first pronunciation given. I don't think it was ever pronounced that way. Leasnam (talk) 04:59, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
 * The OED has one quotation that uses it, but under the entry for corn (in the sense of callus). DTLHS (talk) 05:04, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
 * There's also a use of it in Tyndale's bible translation, but, there again, meaning corn (as in grain). Chuck Entz (talk) 05:30, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Initially, I wasn't able to find anything correct, true, or factual about this entry...looks to be nothing more than a well-crafted Leasnam (talk) 05:32, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I saw something besides Tyndale that raises the possibility of attesting that this was an EME spelling of corn ("grain"). DCDuring TALK 15:07, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

 * The "crown" sense fails RFV; the "corn" sense still needs citations because it's not obvious that there are three modern English citations. Scannos, Middle English and a homographic last name and terms in other languages make it hard to search for. - -sche (discuss) 09:34, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

RFV-failed for the corn sense as well. Kiwima (talk) 20:44, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:coorne


text:
Talk:c.o.w.

RFV discussion: November 2016–May 2017
Difficult to search for, but there are zero hits on Google ngram viewer. (though some for C.O.W.) SemperBlotto (talk) 05:58, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
 * This search yields a couple of mentions, but only for "COW" or "Cow", as far as I can see. Mihia (talk) 01:48, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

 * RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 22:46, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:c.o.w.


text:
Talk:overloe

RFV discussion: November 2016–May 2017
"A shaped block of wood used in conjunction with sandpaper for sanding moulded shapes." Apparently only in the one book mentioned; see discussion at. Equinox ◑ 20:08, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
 * RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 18:20, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:overloe


text:
Talk:baion

RFV discussion: November 2016–May 2017
Adjective: "Of or pertaining to a baiao" (a dance like the samba). It might be a noun, though I can't find a plural, but I don't think adjective is right. Equinox ◑ 00:01, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I don't see any meaning that's citable. RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 22:31, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:baion


text:
Talk:ettler

RFV discussion: November 2016–May 2017
One who ettles. I find only scannos for settler. Equinox ◑ 08:31, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
 * The OED cites John Galt's Ringan Gilhaize: "His father, through all the time of the first King Charles, an eydent ettler for preferment." They mark it Scottish, rare and note: "Sc. National Dict. records this word as still in use in Roxburghshire in 1944." Ƿidsiþ 08:41, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

 * Real, but so extremely rare that I'd doubt we could attest it in Scots, let alone in English. RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 18:21, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:ettler


text:
Talk:nonJapanese

RFV discussion: November 2016–May 2017
Many Google Book results (all I looked at) when searching for "nonJapanese" or "nonjapanese" actually contain "non-Japanese" with a hyphen and a capital J. -薫七 (talk) 00:19, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

 * My entries from 2011. I think they are mistaken; I may not have been checking for scannos back then. Equinox ◑ 09:33, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

 * RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 18:17, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:nonJapanese


text:
Talk:nonjapanese

RFV discussion: November 2016–May 2017

 * See Talk:nonJapanese.

title: Talk:nonjapanese


text:
Talk:planetality

RFV discussion: December 2016–May 2017
There are hits, but not enough searching for both singular and plural in Google Books and Google Groups combined to pass any one sense- though the first one is close. Chuck Entz (talk) 05:54, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I have added two cites for the first sense -- all we need is one more Kiwima (talk) 20:42, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

RFV-resolved - first sense passes, second sense fails. Kiwima (talk) 20:57, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:planetality


text:
Talk:enography

RFV discussion: December 2016–May 2017
Writing about wine. Though oenography (uncountable) exists, I can't find this spelling in either single or plural in Google Books. Equinox ◑ 18:17, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
 * RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 18:59, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:enography


text:
Talk:asantaclausist

RFV discussion: December 2016–May 2017
One Books hit, which I think might be a use. Lots of Google Groups hits, but these all look like mentions to me - variations on "Why do we say 'atheist' when we don't say 'asantaclausist'?". Smurrayinchester (talk) 15:40, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I have added one cite that is a use, but someone else will have to find others. Kiwima (talk) 19:45, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

 * RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 19:17, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:asantaclausist


text:
Talk:wardrobe malfunctioner

RFV discussion: December 2016–May 2017
Any takers? SemperBlotto (talk) 16:40, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I have added two cites, but one is rather iffy. Kiwima (talk) 19:53, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

 * Looks RFV passed to me. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 19:18, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:wardrobe malfunctioner


text:
Talk:narcopathic

RFV discussion: December 2016–May 2017
"A narcotic addiction driven anti social sociopathic form of behaviour"; however, it's entered as an adjective, not a noun. Very little in Google Books: what I can find on the wider Web suggests it is about narcissism and sociopathy, not narcotics and sociopathy. Equinox ◑ 18:57, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I found and added two citations that clearly indicate narcotic addiction. We still need a third. Kiwima (talk) 21:02, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

 * I found one more. RFV passed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 19:14, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:narcopathic


text:
Talk:barythymia

RFV discussion: December 2016–May 2017
Added one mention that's probably just a transliteration of the Greek term. There's also a poem called "Barythymia: A Poem, Addressed to the Sons and Daughters of Adversity" from 1810 that may be the origin of the word, but I couldn't see the actual poem. DTLHS (talk) 02:24, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

 * Added one from 2012. That gives us three if we count the poem title, which seems to me more of a use than a mention (since it does bear meaning). Equinox ◑ 02:39, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Historically, we have counted titles as uses. None of the three are great, but I would still consider this cited. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 03:17, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

 * First half of the poem at HathiTrust. I'm not sure it's really a use; it's a name for the poem derived from Greek, not an English language word used in the title of a poem. The footnote, correctly or not, thinks it's basically Greek, not English. It's not used in the body (I don't think; I didn't look for the second half, though it should be in the next issue.) If a third cite is not found and it is agreed the poem title doesn't count, it desperately needs to go to dictionary-only words.
 * I've added a usage note about how rare and pointless it is.--Prosfilaes (talk) 01:15, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

 * Is the word attested in actual Ancient Greek, or was it formed in English? DTLHS (talk) 01:19, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

 * There are attestations for βαρύς θυμός, but Google Books doesn't find any for βαρύσθυμός. Of course, I know no Greek, so there are any number of mistakes I could be making. this dictionary seems to have the Greek word, third column.--Prosfilaes (talk) 02:22, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

 * RFV passed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 22:37, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:barythymia


text:
Talk:beatsauce

RFV discussion: December 2016–May 2017
1. Boring thing. 2. Unattractive person. Nothing much in Books; only a DJ's name in Groups. Equinox ◑ 02:04, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
 * RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 19:29, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:beatsauce


text:
Talk:nuked

RFV discussion: December 2016–May 2017
"drunk, smashed". Searches for "nuked on whisky", "nuked on vodka" etc don't find anything relevant. Equinox ◑ 03:56, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Urban Dictionary has a single low-ranked definition for this (also, three low-ranked defs for "stoned"). I tried some google phrases unsuccessfully as well (e.g. "getting nuked on" ~bar); possibly this is too minor and/or local usage to be citable. --Tropylium (talk) 11:58, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

 * RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 19:52, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:nuked


text:
Talk:rengo-geiko

RFV discussion: December 2016–May 2017
One quotation added. DTLHS (talk) 00:30, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

 * FWIW, I'm not sure the JA etymon qualifies as a singular term -- + .  I can't find any JA materials that treat this as a lemma.  I'm also finding online cases where the term is read as either rengō keiko or as rengō-geiko, suggesting that both are possible.  ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 21:24, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
 * RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 21:49, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:rengo-geiko


text:
Talk:naked apron

RFV discussion: December 2016–May 2017
Apron worn while naked. Seems to be a term invented by TVTropes. Equinox ◑ 21:59, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

 * The citations now added are "naked apron bit" and "naked apron scene": I believe that, here, "naked" modifies "scene" (as in nude scene): it's not a (naked-apron) scene but a naked (apron-scene). So I don't think the cites are valid. Equinox ◑ 07:21, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

 * Some quotes have "naked apron" between quotation marks. I believe this suggests that it's a set phrase.
 * I got 4 citations (+1 citation for "naked-apron" with an hyphen).
 * I believe the entry is cited. But if I'm wrong, then maybe this RFV will fail, because I went through all the results for "naked apron" in Google Books and Google Groups and got all the citations I found.
 * Then again, if we find some uses of "naked towel" meaning "wearing only a towel", "naked bra" meaning "wearing only a bra", etc., then we may want to delete naked apron and add a new definition at naked meaning "wearing only a certain piece of clothing". --Daniel Carrero (talk) 07:41, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Isn’t it a calque of the Japanese, which is quite common? — T AKASUGI Shinji (talk) 16:29, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

 * RFV passed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 19:37, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:naked apron


text:
Talk:slavenly

RFV discussion: December 2016–May 2017
Befitting a slave. Equinox ◑ 07:06, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Some sort of rare confusion between and, it seems. RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 19:47, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

I found it in the Battle Brothers game, so it seems this word do exist. 95.67.36.253

title: Talk:slavenly


text:
Talk:all-over oneself

RFV discussion: January–May 2017
"Feeling self-satisfied." I suspect the hyphen is wrong, but I can't easily find the phrase in either case. Equinox ◑ 06:51, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

 * I can find this in a few dictionaries, and also in the following:
 * I'm not sure the blogs count as durably archived, so it may not be enough. Kiwima (talk) 18:29, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
 * OK, found a third book quote:
 * Kiwima (talk) 18:42, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure the blogs count as durably archived, so it may not be enough. Kiwima (talk) 18:29, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
 * OK, found a third book quote:
 * Kiwima (talk) 18:42, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Kiwima (talk) 18:42, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Kiwima (talk) 18:42, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

RFV-resolved : moved to remove the hyphen, sufficient cites now exist for non-hyphenated form. Kiwima (talk) 21:26, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Like Equinox says, I doubt there should be a hyphen. DonnanZ (talk) 00:31, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Hyphen looks wrong to me too. Mihia (talk) 00:20, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Agreed. I suspect the hyphen is there because it appears that way in at least one dictionary. Kiwima (talk) 02:38, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Two of those ("Best Original Score" and "Kingdom Come") and don't seem to match the definition given - rather, they seem to be using as a synonym for (or malapropism of?) fall over oneself. Smurrayinchester (talk) 13:11, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:all-over oneself


text:
Talk:abolement

RFV discussion: January–May 2017
Looks unlikely from where I'm standing. French probably has a meaning tho. --Quadcont (talk) 18:49, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
 * It appears to be from this dictionary. DTLHS (talk) 18:55, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I can't find any uses, but found it in another dictionary as well - that one defined it as a disorder where the patient barks like a dog. Kiwima (talk) 20:48, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Most b.g.c hits appear to be scannos for aboiement, the French word for "barking". This, that and the other (talk) 08:45, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

 * RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 08:02, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:abolement


text:
Talk:it'd

RFV discussion: January–May 2017
"It had" and "it would", yes, but "it should"?? Equinox ◑ 04:43, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Possibly, if it's a UK use of should for NA would, but isn't that normally restricted to first person ? Leasnam (talk) 18:59, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The only instance where should = would that is not first person that I can think of off the top of my head is the passage in Numbers 23:19 where it say "God is not a man, that he should lie" where should there clearly means would, but this is archaic usage at least Leasnam (talk) 20:23, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

 * I cannot think of any context in BrE in which "it'd" could mean "it should". I question even whether "I'd" can reasonably mean "I should". "I should" in the sense of "I would" (e.g. "I should like to ...") feels formal or dated, and I'm not sure whether anyone would understand "I'd" as meaning that. Mihia (talk) 04:15, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

 * RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 20:09, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:it'd


text:
Talk:spotdesk

RFV discussion: February–May 2017
A team of foreign exchange traders. This seems to be pure invention. Equinox ◑ 15:08, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
 * RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 23:48, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:spotdesk


text:
Talk:filetype

RFV discussion: February–May 2017
"A command that creates...etc." Equinox ◑ 20:03, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
 * RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 04:55, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:filetype


text:
Talk:cyun

RFV discussion: February–May 2017
Obsolete form of scion. Curiously, the plural cyuns failed RFV, while the singular was never challenged. In my experience (though I don't necessarily agree with it), we don't normally do this, and allow unattested hypothetical inflections to stand as long as the lemma is legitimate. Equinox ◑ 22:33, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

 * In case of Latin there are already RFVs for inflected forms above. But well, it might be different for Latin:
 * In Latin one sometimes has to know inflected forms to know the declension.
 * In case of Latin words, especially words with Greek origin, the inflection can be disputed, i.e. it might be unclear how a hypothetical inflection would look like.
 * There can be doubts whether or not a plural existed or exists. Even if English has water and waters, who know whether or not Latin has aqua and aquae or just a singular aqua? But one could most likely ask this for some English words as well.
 * Similary in case of German the inflection can sometimes be disputed.
 * So, to sum it up: RFVs for inflected forms can be justified and can make sense. -84.161.44.63 02:31, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

 * RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 23:45, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:cyun


text:
Talk:coenonymphic

RFV discussion: March–May 2017
Only in the one cited book? Equinox ◑ 15:08, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
 * RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 23:38, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

RFV discussion: March–May 2017
Only in the one cited book? Equinox ◑ 15:08, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
 * RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 23:38, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:coenonymphic


text:
Talk:unjudgemently

RFV discussion: March–May 2017
Added as "humorous". Evident nonce word made up on the spot by the single cited author. No other cites available. Equinox ◑ 03:28, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

 * I would call it a misspelling of unjudgmentally, unjudgementally. —Stephen (Talk) 21:13, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

 * Not common enough to be a misspelling. RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 21:32, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:unjudgemently


text:
Talk:Mont Order

RFV discussion: March–May 2017
A secret society. I see a few Web references but probably nothing meeting WT:CFI. Equinox ◑ 21:30, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Well, it is secret isn't it. SemperBlotto (talk) 21:35, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I managed to find two that are truly distinct, but everything else I find is by L'Ordre, and I already have one quote by him. Kiwima (talk) 07:11, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

 * RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 21:29, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:Mont Order


text:
Talk:kilai

RFV discussion: March–May 2017
It's. Same spelling as 🇨🇬 and 🇨🇬. Cognate with 🇨🇬 and 🇨🇬. 'ai' is 'ay'. 'ai' only appears in borrowed words like. Even is not fully accepted  but is a common spelling. does not appear outside texting. Not a common texting word either. It's a Jejemon way of spelling. Jejemons are ridiculed for their fancy but unnecessary respelling. They make short words long and long words short. Carl Francis (talk) 00:45, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
 * RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 21:30, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:kilai


text:
Talk:oenophlygia

RFV discussion: March–May 2017
Drunkenness. I see one usage in Books, which is more of a mention (a character is checking the word in a dictionary). If it does manage to pass, please gloss appropriately (rare and perhaps humorous?) and add to Wikisaurus:drunkenness. Equinox ◑ 18:52, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
 * But it sure appears in a lot of dictionaries! Another one for the list of dictionary-only words? Kiwima (talk) 20:18, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

 * RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 21:14, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:oenophlygia


text:
Talk:petaampere

RFV discussion: March–May 2017
Cf, above. I see two Google Scholar results which might be printed journals using(ish) the word in appendices of abbreviations. - -sche (discuss) 00:07, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
 * RFV failed and converted to a no-entry, as is standard for unattested SI units. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 21:08, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:petaampere


text:
Talk:arithmosofia

RFV discussion: March–May 2017
No Google Books hits in English, and only one in non-English, which might well be a typo for aritmosofia. Equinox ◑ 19:18, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
 * RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 21:12, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:arithmosofia


text:
Talk:yottacandela

RFV discussion: March–May 2017
The only example I can find is a kinda-mentiony instance in Dodds' Using SI Units in Astronomy when he's explaining various standard and nonstandard ways of writing a certain value. - -sche (discuss) 00:12, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
 * RFV failed and converted to a no-entry, as is standard for unattested SI units. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 21:03, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:yottacandela


text:
Talk:Nerislav

RFV discussion: April–May 2017
An IP triggered an abuse filter trying to redirect this to Berislav. Their stated reason was that it's a common typo for that name, but I don't see enough usage in Serbo-Croation to pass CFI, and I see zero English usage, so I think it would be better to see if we can delete it as nonexistent so we don't have to figure out how to tell if it's a misspelling. Chuck Entz (talk) 04:08, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

 * Well, there are already entries for misspellings as appilation, tripple, and categories for misspellings do also exist: Category:Misspellings by language. So it could be easy "to figure out how to tell if it's a misspelling". Are greater problem could be how to determine that it is a "Common accidental misspellings" (that's the text in the language specific misspelling categories). -84.161.56.85 21:58, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

 * RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 20:19, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

RFV discussion: April–May 2017
An IP triggered an abuse filter trying to redirect this to Berislav. Their stated reason was that it's a common typo for that name, but I don't see enough usage in Serbo-Croation to pass CFI, and I see zero English usage, so I think it would be better to see if we can delete it as nonexistent so we don't have to figure out how to tell if it's a misspelling. Chuck Entz (talk) 04:08, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

 * Well, there are already entries for misspellings as appilation, tripple, and categories for misspellings do also exist: Category:Misspellings by language. So it could be easy "to figure out how to tell if it's a misspelling". Are greater problem could be how to determine that it is a "Common accidental misspellings" (that's the text in the language specific misspelling categories). -84.161.56.85 21:58, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

 * RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 20:19, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:Nerislav


text:
Talk:meecrob

RFV discussion: April–May 2017
Alt form of mi krop, Thai crispy noodles. Equinox ◑ 14:40, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 05:14, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:meecrob


text:
Talk:Vantucky

RFV discussion: April–May 2017
Radio slang isn't often attestable... —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 16:45, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I have added a number of cites, although some of them are rather mention-y. Kiwima (talk) 21:43, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

 * Looks good. RFV passed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 20:57, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:Vantucky


text:
Talk:chaverim

RFV discussion: April–May 2017
What even is this? All I see is codeswitching and maybe Chaverim, but not what supports an entry like this. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 18:27, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
 * One use not italicized:, two uses italicized: , . However, it looks like it has a more specialized meaning than just "friends", but I can't quite tell what. Perhaps "member of a Jewish society or organization" ? Also, I notice that all three books I linked to above do use the singular as well, so the bit about  being plural only in English isn't true. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 18:47, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Also, even italicized/codeswitching uses may be worth keeping since Hebrew isn't written in the Latin alphabet. If someone is reading an English-language book with Spanish-speaking characters and one character calls another, the reader can find the Spanish entry here even without an English entry. But if an English-language book has Hebrew-speaking characters one character addresses his friends as , the reader wouldn't find it here unless we had an English entry for it, because the Hebrew word is written in a different alphabet. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 18:51, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Made into a regular plural form entry and RFV passed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 23:31, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:chaverim


text:
Talk:dorkface

RFV discussion: April–May 2017
"A foolish or unattractive facial expression." One inadmissible citation from Reddit. Equinox ◑ 14:51, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

I can find another inadmissible one on Tumblr. Kiwima (talk) 19:56, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
 * RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 05:08, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:dorkface


text:
Talk:sideboard

RFV discussion: April–May 2017
Is this a universal terms used in all CCGs? ばかFumiko￥talk 03:37, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

cited Kiwima (talk) 22:40, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
 * RFV passed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 20:44, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:sideboard


text:
Talk:Römertopf

RFV discussion: April–May 2017
Is either of these attested in English? Wikipedia's describes the process rather than the cookware, and puts Römertopf in italics, suggesting it's just citing the German word for it. If it's not attested, what should go in the definition for 🇨🇬? —CodeCat 19:52, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
 * My mother used to have one of these that she referred to as a "Römertopf". — JohnC5 19:57, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

 * Cited. - -sche (discuss) 19:53, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

 * RFV passed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 20:41, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:Römertopf


text:
Talk:römertopf

RFV discussion: April–May 2017

 * See Talk:Römertopf.

title: Talk:römertopf


text: Category:nog:Islam

title: Category:nog:Islam


text:
Talk:chiefery

RFV discussion: April–May 2017
Our def here, and the synonyms leadership and management, seem very modern and businessy. But most texts using "chiefery" seem to be talking about old hierarchies, like the chief of a certain geographical area. Is that misleading? Anyway: please verify this sense, or fix/improve it. P.S. Wonderfool made it. Equinox ◑ 00:21, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

 * I could find no support for the existing definition, but added quite a few others for which I did find support. Kiwima (talk) 03:42, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

 * RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 23:33, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:chiefery


text:
สเกตบอร์ด

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) skateboard

title: สเกตบอร์ด


text: MCD

title: MCD


text:
baluwaa

Adverb

 * 1) slowly, steadily
 * 2) quietly

title: baluwaa


text:
附注

Verb

 * 1) to annotate; to add notes

Noun

 * 1) annotations; notes appended

title: 附注


text:
αλύπητος

Adjective

 * 1) merciless, pitiless

title: αλύπητος


text:
附議

Verb

 * 1) to second a motion; to support a proposal

title: 附議


text:
傅會

Verb

 * 1) to draw wrong conclusions by false analogy; to strain one's interpretation

title: 傅會


text:
腹地

Noun

 * 1) hinterland; interior; outback

title: 腹地


text:
父老

Noun

 * 1)  elder (of a country or district)

title: 父老


text:
駙馬

Noun

 * 1) husband of an sovereign's daughter or sister; monarch's son-in-law or brother-in-law

Descendants
Others:

Noun

 * 1)  a Chinese prince consort, the husband of a  and son-in-law of the Chinese emperor

title: 駙馬


text: 驸马

title: 驸马


text:
付印

Verb

 * 1) to send to the press
 * 2) to turn over to the printing shop after proofreading

title: 付印


text:
付排

Verb

 * 1)  to send to the compositor

title: 付排


text: 傅会

title: 傅会


text: 附议

title: 附议


text:
複賽

Noun

 * 1)  intermediary heat; semifinals

Verb

 * 1) to compete in a semifinal

title: 複賽


text: 复赛

title: 复赛


text:
負疚

Verb

 * 1)  to feel apologetic; to have a guilty conscience

title: 負疚


text:
負約

Verb

 * 1) to break a promise; to go back on one's word
 * 2) to fail to keep an appointment

title: 負約


text: 负疚

title: 负疚


text: 负约

title: 负约


text: Category:en:Earwigs

title: Category:en:Earwigs


text: Category:Earwigs

title: Category:Earwigs


text: 附註

title: 附註


text:
αλυσιδωτός

Adjective

 * 1) chain

title: αλυσιδωτός


text: తృణం

title: తృణం


text:
複核

Verb

 * 1) to check and verify again

title: 複核


text:
αλυσιδωτή πανοπλία

Noun

 * 1)  chain mail, mail

title: αλυσιδωτή πανοπλία


text: 复核

title: 复核


text: πανοπλίας

title: πανοπλίας


text: πανοπλιών

title: πανοπλιών


text: πανοπλίες

title: πανοπλίες


text: χίμαιρας

title: χίμαιρας


text: χιμαιρών

title: χιμαιρών


text: χίμαιρες

title: χίμαιρες


text:
複診

Verb

 * 1)  to have a medical follow-up; to seek medical advice again

title: 複診


text: 复诊

title: 复诊


text:
飯勺

Noun

 * 1) rice scoop; rice spoon

title: 飯勺


text: 饭勺

title: 饭勺


text:
αλυσόδεμα

Noun

 * 1) chaining

title: αλυσόδεμα


text: 房改

title: 房改


text:
mastus

Etymology
Borrowed from. Found in the 8th-century Reichenau Glossary.

Noun

 * 1) ship mast

title: mastus


text: αλυσοδέματος

title: αλυσοδέματος


text: αλυσοδεμάτων

title: αλυσοδεμάτων


text: αλυσοδέματα

title: αλυσοδέματα


text:
麥克

Etymology 1
From or.

Etymology 2
From or, from.

Prefix

 * 1) Mc-; Mac-

Etymology 3
From ; the choice of hanzi is influenced by.

Noun

 * 1)  microphone

title: 麥克


text:
αλυσόδετος

Adjective

 * 1) chained

title: αλυσόδετος


text: 麦克

title: 麦克


text: Template:list:Latin script letters/kpw

title: Template:list:Latin script letters/kpw


text: δένδρου

title: δένδρου


text: δένδρων

title: δένδρων


text: δένδρα

title: δένδρα


text: δενδρολίβανων

title: δενδρολίβανων


text: δενδρολιβάνων

title: δενδρολιβάνων


text: δενδρολίβανα

title: δενδρολίβανα


text: δενδρολιβάνου

title: δενδρολιβάνου


text: δενδρολίβανου

title: δενδρολίβανου


text:
яблочник

Noun

 * 1)  apple grower or seller
 * 2)  member of an organization or political party using an apple as a symbol
 * 3)  insect that feeds exclusively on apples
 * 4) ''senses related to Apple Inc.:
 * 5)  avid user of Apple products
 * 6) users of Apple's products in general
 * 7)  casserole or cake containing apples

title: яблочник


text: δεντρολίβανου

title: δεντρολίβανου


text: δεντρολιβάνου

title: δεντρολιβάνου


text: δεντρολίβανων

title: δεντρολίβανων


text: δεντρολιβάνων

title: δεντρολιβάνων


text: δεντρολίβανα

title: δεντρολίβανα


text:
భాషించు

Verb

 * 1) To speak, use language, converse, talk.

title: భాషించు


text: σκέψης

title: σκέψης


text: σκέψεως

title: σκέψεως


text: σκέψεων

title: σκέψεων


text:
返聘

Verb

 * 1) to employ a retired person usually in the same workplace

title: 返聘


text: σκέψεις

title: σκέψεις


text: Template:list:Cyrillic script letters/kpy


text: δέους

title: δέους


text: 丰韻

title: 丰韻


text: 丰韵

title: 丰韵


text: Template:list:Latin script letters/kqf

title: Template:list:Latin script letters/kqf


text:
hochintelligent

Adjective

 * 1) highly intelligent

title: hochintelligent


text:
проходимость

Noun

 * 1) permeability
 * 2) ability to carry traffic
 * 3) ability to travel cross-country

title: проходимость


text:
hochinteressant

Adjective

 * 1) fascinating

title: hochinteressant


text:
hochklassig

Adjective

 * 1) high-class

title: hochklassig


text:
драчливый

Adjective

 * 1) pugnacious

title: драчливый


text:
idiotistic

Adjective

 * 1)  Specific to one idiolect.

title: idiotistic


text:
hochkompliziert

Adjective

 * 1) highly complex

title: hochkompliziert


text: Template:list:Latin script letters/kri

title: Template:list:Latin script letters/kri


text:
ईषत्

Etymology
.

Adjective

 * 1) very little, less, minuscule

Etymology
From, from , from , from. Cognate with 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬 and 🇨🇬.

Adjective

 * 1) few, little

Adverb

 * 1) slightly

title: ईषत्


text:
భావి

Etymology
.

Adjective

 * 1) future, later, subsequent

Noun

 * 1) future

title: భావి


text:
hochmittelalterlich

Etymology
or

Adjective

 * 1)  High Medieval

title: hochmittelalterlich


text:
hochmodern

Adjective

 * 1) ultramodern

title: hochmodern


text:
-bourg

Etymology
.

title: -bourg


text: Template:list:Latin script letters/kud

title: Template:list:Latin script letters/kud


text:
hochmögend

Adjective

 * 1) powerful, influential

title: hochmögend


text:
雞腸

Noun

 * 1) chicken intestines
 * 2)  foreign language written in cursive Latin alphabet, especially English
 * 1)  foreign language written in cursive Latin alphabet, especially English
 * 1)  foreign language written in cursive Latin alphabet, especially English
 * 1)  foreign language written in cursive Latin alphabet, especially English
 * 1)  foreign language written in cursive Latin alphabet, especially English
 * 1)  foreign language written in cursive Latin alphabet, especially English
 * 1)  foreign language written in cursive Latin alphabet, especially English

title: 雞腸


text: 鸡肠

title: 鸡肠


text:
hochnäsig

Adjective

 * 1) snooty, stuck-up, haughty
 * 2) supercilious, arrogant
 * 1) supercilious, arrogant

title: hochnäsig


text:
భావించు

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) To imagine, feel.

title: భావించు


text: Template:list:Cyrillic script letters/kum


text:
ampumatarviketäydennys

Noun

 * 1) ammunition resupply, replenishment of ammunition

title: ampumatarviketäydennys


text:
hochsprachlich

Adjective

 * 1) literary; standard (of language)

title: hochsprachlich


text: 丝袜奶茶

title: 丝袜奶茶


text:
ammustäydennys

Noun

 * 1) ammunition resupply, replenishment of ammunition

title: ammustäydennys


text:
hochtourig

Adjective

 * 1) high-speed

title: hochtourig


text:
絲襪奶茶

Etymology
Named for the sackcloth bag used to filter the tea leaves, which resembles pantyhose due to prolonged tea drenching.

Noun

 * 1) “pantyhose milk tea”; Hong Kong-style milk tea

title: 絲襪奶茶


text:
Louisbourg

Etymology
Borrowed from, named after.

Etymology
From.

title: Louisbourg


text: ammustarvike

title: ammustarvike


text: Category:French terms suffixed with -bourg


text: 丝袜

title: 丝袜


text:
hochtrabend

Adjective

 * 1) pompous, pretentious, highfalutin

title: hochtrabend


text:
絲襪

Noun

 * 1) pantyhose; stockings

title: 絲襪


text: сахарок

title: сахарок


text:
hochverehrt

Adjective

 * 1) highly-esteemed

title: hochverehrt


text: ఆలోచనలు

title: ఆలోచనలు


text: сольца

title: сольца


text:
hochverräterisch

Etymology
or

Adjective

 * 1)  high treason; highly-treasonable

title: hochverräterisch


text: маслице

title: маслице


text:
hochverschuldet

Adjective

 * 1) highly-indebted (heavily in debt)

title: hochverschuldet


text:
hochzeitlich

Etymology
From or.

Adjective

 * 1) nuptial, bridal

title: hochzeitlich


text:
Νυσεύς

Etymology
From.

Proper noun

 * , Nysan

title: Νυσεύς


text:
희로애락

Noun

 * 1) joy, anger, sorrow, and happiness; emotions

title: 희로애락


text: pyrexiae

title: pyrexiae


text:
괴물

Noun

 * 1) monster; freak

title: 괴물


text:
quái vật

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) monster

title: quái vật


text:
몬스터

Etymology
Borrowed from.

Noun

 * 1) monster

title: 몬스터


text:
thiệt

Etymology 1
..

is the only instance where this particular form has been adopted by all dialects.

Adjective

 * 1)  real; true; factual

Noun

 * 1) mistreatment; injustice

title: thiệt


text:
California mugwort

Noun

 * 1) A fragrant perennial herb resembling mugwort native to western North America from Washington to northern Baja California,

title: California mugwort


text:
cloud-ridden

Adjective

 * 1) Full of clouds.
 * 2) During which the sky is full of clouds.
 * 3) Covered or obscured by clouds.
 * 1) During which the sky is full of clouds.
 * 2) Covered or obscured by clouds.
 * 1) Covered or obscured by clouds.
 * 1) Covered or obscured by clouds.

title: cloud-ridden


text: California mugworts

title: California mugworts


text: Category:zh:Annelids

title: Category:zh:Annelids


text:
sınalgı

Etymology
A borrowing from, proposed as part of a purist drive to replace words with non-Turkic roots by pure Turkic words.

Noun

 * 1)  television

Usage notes

 * The proposal has gained no traction, and almost no Turks will understand this word or even recognize it as Turkish. The normal term, used by most Turks, is.

title: sınalgı


text:
maasilta

Noun

 * 1) viaduct bridge over dry land to avoid some obstacle

title: maasilta


text:
maakannas

Noun

 * 1) land bridge

title: maakannas


text:
laaschten

Etymology
From. Cognate with 🇨🇬.

Verb

 * 1)  to weigh on

title: laaschten


text:
tapsilog

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) a serving of tapa with fried rice and fried egg

Etymology
, or alternatively +.

Noun

 * 1)  with fried rice and fried egg

title: tapsilog


text:
tosilog

Noun

 * 1) a serving of tocino with fried rice and fried egg

title: tosilog


text:
tapsilogan

Noun

 * 1) a store or restaurant that specializes in silog meals

title: tapsilogan


text:
犬薄荷

Etymology
lit. 'dog mint',

Noun

 * 1) catmint

title: 犬薄荷


text:
silog

Noun

 * 1) a serving of fried rice and fried egg side by side with tocino, ham, tapa and the like

Etymology
A portmanteau/.

title: silog


text:
vrouwenhater

Etymology
Compound of.

title: vrouwenhater


text: vrouwenhaters

title: vrouwenhaters


text:
hamsilog

Noun

 * 1) a serving of ham with fried rice and fried egg

title: hamsilog


text:
longsilog

Noun

 * 1) a serving of longganisa with fried rice and fried egg

title: longsilog


text:
bangsilog

Noun

 * 1) a serving of daing with fried rice and fried egg

title: bangsilog


text:
silogan

Noun

 * 1) a store or restaurant that specializes in silog meals

title: silogan


text:
sinangag

Etymology
⟨ceb⟩

Adjective

 * 1) dry-roasted; toasted

Noun

 * 1) fried rice

Etymology
From ⟨tl⟩.

Noun

 * 1) fried rice

Adjective

 * 1) fried
 * 2) roasted; toasted

title: sinangag


text:
Poets

Proper noun

 * 1) The 26th sura (chapter) of the Qur'an.

Translations

 * Arabic:
 * Swedish: Poeterna

title: Poets


text:
восьмая

Noun

 * 1) eighth part

title: восьмая


text:
Iron

Etymology 1
Translation of the.

Proper noun

 * 1) The 57th sura (chapter) of the Qur'an.

Translations

 * Uyghur: ھەدىد

Etymology 2
From, a derivation (with the adjective suffix from the historical genitive plural ) of. probably reflexes. Because the Digoron ethnonym for the Ir is, Cheung (2002) has suggested a derivation from the plural. is unrelated to despite the superficial similarity in form. Borrowed into the Vainakh languages (and some Dagestani languages) as their exonym for the Ossetes, cf. ,.

Proper noun

 * 1) A group of Ossetians of the northern Caucasus who speak the Iron Ossetian dialect.

Adjective

 * 1) Of or pertaining to the Iron people.

title: Iron


text:
阿嬡

Noun

 * 1)  mother

title: 阿嬡


text:
Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2017-05/Simplifying CFI about constructed languages

Simplifying CFI about constructed languages
Voting on: Simplifying WT:CFI as follows:

Old text:

Constructed languages have not developed naturally, but are the product of conscious effort in the fulfillment of some purpose. In general, such languages, particularly languages associated with works of fiction, do not meet the basic requirement that one might run across them and want to know the meaning of their words, since they are only used in a narrow context in which further material on the language is readily available. There are specific exceptions to this general rule, listed below, based on consensus of the Wiktionary community; Esperanto, for example, is a living language with a sizeable community of fluent speakers, and even some native speakers.

Some individual terms from constructed languages have been adopted into other languages. These should be treated as terms in the adoptive language, and the origin noted in the etymology, regardless of whether the constructed language as a whole meets the criteria for inclusion.

Languages that are not natural languages must have consensus to be included.

 * These languages have an apparent consensus (all have ISO 639-3 codes): Esperanto, Ido, Interlingua, Interlingue (Occidental), Lojban, Novial, Volapük.

 * At present, several other languages have ISO 639-3 codes and are classified as constructed languages. Three are prohibited (see below); the remainder have not yet been approved for inclusion in the English Wiktionary.

 * There is no apparent consensus for including these additional languages which do not have ISO 639-3 codes: Ceqli (Tceqli), D'ni, Delason, Ekspreso, Europanto, Glos, Jakelimotu, Kyerepon, Latejami, Latino sine Flexione, Linga, Romanica, Sasxsek, Suoczil, Toki Pona.

 * There is consensus that languages whose origin and use are restricted to one or more related literary works and its fans do not merit inclusion as entries or translations in the main namespace. They may merit lexicons in the Appendix namespace. These languages include Quenya, Sindarin, Klingon, and Orcish (the first three do have ISO 639-3 codes).

Even when rejected for treatment as a language for purposes of this Wiktionary, a single article about the name of that language may be acceptable.

References:

New text:

Constructed languages have not developed naturally, but are the product of conscious effort in the fulfillment of some purpose.

All constructed languages are excluded except for Esperanto, Ido, Interlingua, Interlingue (Occidental), Lojban, Novial, and Volapük.

Some individual terms from constructed languages have been adopted into other languages. These should be treated as terms in the adoptive language, and the origin noted in the etymology, regardless of whether the constructed language as a whole is included.

Languages originating from literary works should not be included as entries or translations in the main namespace, consistent with the above. However, the following ones should have lexicons in the Appendix namespace: Quenya, Sindarin, Klingon, and Orcish.

References:

Schedule:
 * Vote starts: 00:00, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Vote ends: 23:59, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Vote created: Dan Polansky (talk) 09:40, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Discussion:
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] Beer parlour/2017/May
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2017-05/Simplifying CFI about constructed languages

Support

 * 1)  --Daniel Carrero (talk) 00:07, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
 * 2) . Makes sense. -Xbony2 (talk) 00:28, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
 * 3)  —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 03:46, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
 * 4)  For a rationale, see the vote talk page. --Dan Polansky (talk) 20:47, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
 * 5)  It is to the point and removes a lot of useless banter. Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk) 09:56, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
 * The old policy basically said nobody will ever see words in constructed languages, which is not true. --IAmAmillion
 * Struck as ineligible to vote. —Granger (talk · contribs) 23:52, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
 * 1)  I guess… Mistrz (talk) 13:40, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
 * 2)  I approve of removing clutter.__Gamren (talk) 15:34, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
 * 3)  New version says everything that needs to be said. -  [The] DaveRoss  13:06, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
 * 4)  The new version is much more concise and to the point, while still retaining all the pertinent information. BigDom 16:06, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) on the basis that it omits the  rationale: "In general, such languages, particularly languages associated with works of fiction, do not meet the basic requirement that one might run across them and want to know the meaning of their words...". This helps the first-time reader to understand why the policy exists. Otherwise, people might think we are purists with an arbitrary dislike of constructed languages. This, that and the other (talk) 12:32, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 * For one thing, I don't think the policy should contain a rationale. For another thing, the rationale seems to be incorrect: Constructed languages do not differ all that much from poorly documented natural languages in their ability to contain words that people once in a long while run across. It surely is quite possible for people to run across a word in a constructed language, although rarely so; but then, the same holds true of very rare English words: since they are rare, people only rarely run across them. --Dan Polansky (talk) 17:41, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 * 1)  Too much useful information has been cut out. --WikiTiki89 16:41, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 * If you can be more specific, this may help draft a follow-up vote. --Dan Polansky (talk) 17:41, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I guess mostly just the second sentence of the first paragraph, which others have already mentioned. --WikiTiki89 17:53, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you. The 2nd sentence seems false as per my response to TTTO above: you can run across words of constructed languages, even if rarely so. --Dan Polansky (talk) 18:02, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 * It should have been corrected, but not removed. --WikiTiki89 18:14, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Corrected to say what? (I don't think a policy should contain a rationale, but that is a separate argument.) --Dan Polansky (talk) 18:15, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 * To explain why constructed languages do not meet CFI. --WikiTiki89 18:20, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Sure, and what is the specific explanation that you have for the reader, to be placed to CFI? --Dan Polansky (talk) 18:23, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Abstain

 * 1) . Some of what has been cut could be useful in clarifying what constitutes a constructed language and how we handle them, but I'm ambivalent as to whether it stays or not. Andrew Sheedy (talk) 07:09, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Decision
Passed: 9-2-1 (81%). Edited WT:CFI accordingly. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 02:46, 25 June 2017 (UTC)


text:
Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2017-05/Simplifying CFI about constructed languages

Rationale
The current text should better be simplified without change of the actual policy. I hope to add more detail later. --Dan Polansky (talk) 09:42, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Some added detail: First, the policy text should get to the point as fast as possible. Second, the policy does not need to talk about consensus. It does not need to say that a certain kind of languages must have consensus in order to be included; it suffices that the policy excludes all constructed languages except for allowed ones, taking advantage of the fact that the list of allowed constructed languages can be expanded only via consensus, specifically via CFI-modifying vote. I made other simplification as well, and leave it without comment. --Dan Polansky (talk) 20:28, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

List of excluded languages
Why would we leave the following sentence in: "Languages excluded as per above include Ceqli (Tceqli), D'ni, Delason, Ekspreso, Europanto, Glos, Jakelimotu, Kyerepon, Latejami, Latino sine Flexione, Linga, Romanica, Sasxsek, Suoczil, Toki Pona, and others."? The list of constructed languages for which there is no consensus for inclusion is uncountable, and these are not such special languages that they deserve mention in our policy. I think removing this sentence would be an additional improvement. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 06:53, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I thought about removing the list when I created the vote. I decided to keep it to give a more extensive idea of what we mean by a constructed language, and to make the CFI location findable for anyone using the language names as search keywords. On the other hand, the list of included languages already gives such an idea. On a related note, e.g. finds close to nothing so I wonder where that name comes from. I have removed the list as proposed. --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:07, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
 * A further note: Based on Votes/pl-2010-12/Clarification of language inclusion, it seems the list I kept in the new proposal and that is now removed is a list of languages without ISO 639-3 code. --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:28, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Place for expansion
If the proposed text is changed to not imply that no new constructed languages may ever be included even when consensus arises (probably not going to happen, but still), I will wholeheartedly support.__Gamren (talk) 11:08, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
 * @Gamren: I don't think we can expand the text at this stage of the running vote. I think it goes without saying that CFI can be changed as a result of consensus, and such a change can either expand or contract the list of constructed languages allowed. The CFI contains plentiful references to votes that modify CFI, some of them rather substantially; thereby, the CFI reader should gain the proper impression about the modifiability of CFI. I don't see any place of the proposed text that implies "that no new constructed languages may ever be included even when consensus arises". --Dan Polansky (talk) 15:19, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
 * "All constructed languages are excluded except for Esperanto, Ido, Interlingua, Interlingue (Occidental), Lojban, Novial, and Volapük.", where perhaps "suggests" would be a better word. But sure, have my vote.__Gamren (talk) 15:34, 17 June 2017 (UTC)


text: Guìjī

title: Guìjī


text: liúhàn

title: liúhàn


text: fāhàn

title: fāhàn