text:
sampulo

Etymology
, from.

Numeral

 * 1) ten

Numeral

 * 1) ten

Numeral

 * 1)  ten

Numeral

 * 1)  ten

title: sampulo


text:
кукарекать

Verb

 * 1) to crow to make the sound of a rooster

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: кукарекать


text: Category:Bikol Central numerals

title: Category:Bikol Central numerals


text:
矜貴

Adjective

 * 1)  conceited
 * 2)  noble; aristocratic
 * 3)  precious; valued; valuable

Synonyms

title: 矜貴


text:
крупье

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) croupier person who collects bets and pays out winnings at a gambling table

title: крупье


text:
puliyo

Noun

 * 1)  mint

title: puliyo


text:
tangguli

Noun

 * 1) honey
 * 2) molasses

title: tangguli


text: Category:Cornish terms borrowed from Medieval Latin


text:
tanggugurang

Etymology
From ⟨bcl⟩.

Noun

 * 1)  thumb

title: tanggugurang


text:
wagak

Noun

 * 1) drool; slobber; spittle
 * 2) saliva

title: wagak


text:
usol

Noun

 * 1)  asthma

title: usol


text:
uuslon

Etymology
From.

title: uuslon


text:
usod

Noun

 * 1) bet; stake; wager

Etymology
Compare 🇨🇬 and 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) moving to the side a little
 * 2) overnight stay
 * 1) overnight stay

title: usod


text:
urig

Etymology
Adjectival formation from. Suggested as the etymology of the toponym (which in  is derived from ). Suggested by Wood as cognate with 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬 (PIE root ).

Adjective

 * 1) wild, tempestuous, raging of the weather
 * 2) uncouth, irascible of people

Noun

 * 1) pig; hog; swine

Adjective

 * 1) rustic, authentic; original
 * 2) * 2012, Die Zeit, 10.07.2012, Nr. 28:
 * "de"
 * 1) * 2012, Die Zeit, 10.07.2012, Nr. 28:
 * "de"
 * "de"

- Klar, in dieser Atmosphäre fühlte sich der urige Bayer richtig wohl.

title: urig


text: Category:kw:Metals

title: Category:kw:Metals


text:
upaw

Etymology
.

Adjective

 * 1) bald

Etymology
.

Adjective

 * 1) having no hair, fur or feathers
 * 2) having no hair on the head
 * 3) having a closely-cropped hairstyle
 * 4) without leaves; leafless

Noun

 * 1)  a baldhead; a person whose head is bald

Verb

 * 1) to become bald
 * 2) to get a buzzcut
 * 3) to have one's head shaved
 * 4)  to lose its leaves

Etymology
.

Adjective

 * 1) bald

Noun

 * 1) baldness
 * 2) act of shaving off the hair

title: upaw


text:
umboy

Noun

 * 1)  baby; infant

title: umboy


text:
ukyot

Noun

 * 1)  climb

title: ukyot


text: Category:Cornish terms derived from Late Latin


text:
ugis

Noun

 * 1) albino

Noun

 * 1) a shade of white like that of chicken feathers
 * 2) a chicken with completely white feathers
 * 3) an albino; a person or animal with albinism

Adjective

 * 1) having a white color like that of chicken feathers

Noun

 * 1) albino person

Noun

 * 1) albino person

title: ugis


text:
ugit

Noun

 * 1) rudder; helm

title: ugit


text:
maugma

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) glad; gay; happy; merry

Verb

 * 1) to be happy, glad, gay, merry

title: maugma


text:
зайдуу

Adjective

 * 1) faraway, distant

title: зайдуу


text: Category:Mongolian terms suffixed with -уу


text:
tugmad

Verb

 * 1)  to prove; to give basis
 * 2) to dive to test the depth of any bodies of water

title: tugmad


text:
tabangungo

Noun

 * 1) catfish

title: tabangungo


text:
позывной

Noun

 * 1) code name
 * 2) call sign broadcasting, military
 * 3) signature tune TV, radio

title: позывной


text:
suwail

Adjective

 * 1) disobedient; insubordinate

Etymology
Compare 🇨🇬.

Adjective

 * 1) disobedient; stubborn; hardheaded
 * 2) insubordinate; insolent; rebellious
 * 3) traitorous; disloyal
 * 4) ungrateful
 * 1) traitorous; disloyal
 * 2) ungrateful
 * 1) ungrateful

title: suwail


text:
taliba

Etymology
From. A play on.

Noun

 * 1)  the female genitalia; the vulva or vagina

Noun

 * 1) sentinel; guard; vanguard
 * 2) act of guarding
 * 3) one's turn or shift of guarding
 * 1) one's turn or shift of guarding
 * 1) one's turn or shift of guarding

title: taliba


text:
Talk:mittlere

Mittlere is inflected form of mittlere?
I'm thinking there's something wrong here, I don't think self-referential cycles are very useful. However, I am just learning German so I cannot fix it in any useful way, please help. --Flammie (talk) 11:21, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:mittlere


text:
haluwag

Etymology
From.

title: haluwag


text:
lusrat

Etymology
Corruption of.

Adjective

 * 1)  drunk; intoxicated

title: lusrat


text:
lupog

Adjective

 * 1) weak-kneed

Verb

 * 1)  to sting; to hurt; to be in pain
 * 2) to run after

Noun

 * 1) old man
 * 2) husband

Adjective

 * 1) rotting due to soaking in too much water

Noun

 * 1) rotting due to soaking in too much water

title: lupog


text:
lukban

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) pomelo

Etymology
. Compare 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, and 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) pomelo

Noun

 * 1) pomelo

title: lukban


text:
flaveler

Etymology
.

Verb

 * 1) to use a rattle

title: flaveler


text:
sokeroittaa

Verb

 * 1) to turn into sugar

title: sokeroittaa


text:
-уу

Etymology
Cognate with 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, etc.

Suffix

 * 1) Used to form gerunds from verbs.

title: -уу


text:
पुष्टि

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) well-nourished condition, fatness, plumpness, growth, increase, thriving, prosperity, wealth, opulence, comfort

title: पुष्टि


text:
-үү

Etymology
Cognate with 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, etc.

Suffix

 * 1) Used to form gerunds from verbs.

title: -үү


text:
पुष्ट

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) nourished, cherished, well-fed, thriving, strong, fat, full, complete, perfect, abundant, rich, great, ample.

title: पुष्ट


text:
sokerivesikuorrute

Noun

 * 1) glazing, icing foodstuff coating made of powdered sugar, water, flavors and colors

title: sokerivesikuorrute


text: skinkes

title: skinkes


text: skinkens

title: skinkens


text:
पुष्करिन्

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) abounding in lotuses.

title: पुष्करिन्


text: skinkerne

title: skinkerne


text: skinkernes

title: skinkernes


text:
kuorruttaminen

Noun

 * 1) coating the act of coating especially with foodstuff
 * 2) frosting, icing
 * 1) frosting, icing

title: kuorruttaminen


text: sokerivesikuorrutus

title: sokerivesikuorrutus


text: sokerivedellä

title: sokerivedellä


text: sokerikuorrutus

title: sokerikuorrutus


text:
నైమిశము

Etymology
From.

Proper noun

 * 1)  Name of a forest mentioned in Hindu puranas.

title: నైమిశము


text:
sokerileipomo

Noun

 * 1) pastry shop, patisserie

title: sokerileipomo


text:
måleri

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  painting
 * 2) painting

Etymology
From. Compare 🇨🇬 and 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) painting
 * 2)  painting

title: måleri


text:
руу

Etymology
From, from. Cognate with 🇨🇬; 🇨🇬,,. .

Usage notes

 * Due to its recent development as a grammatical case, directive case suffixes are written with a space between the stem and suffix.
 * Generally equivalent to the English term when used in reference to a location, as in "I'm going down to the shop".

title: руу


text: Category:te:Forests

title: Category:te:Forests


text: 矜贵

title: 矜贵


text: Category:Mongolian case suffixes

title: Category:Mongolian case suffixes


text: Category:Mongolian declensional suffixes


text: Category:English terms borrowed from Danish


text: Category:kw:Buildings

title: Category:kw:Buildings


text:
заусеница

Noun

 * 1) agnail, hangnail
 * 2) wire-edge, burr

title: заусеница


text:
заусенец

Noun

 * 1) agnail, hangnail
 * 2) wire-edge, burr

title: заусенец


text:
కీకారణ్యము

Noun

 * 1) A dark forest.

title: కీకారణ్యము


text:
Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2016-08/User:Dan Polansky for admin

User:Dan Polansky for admin

 * Nomination:

I hereby nominate as a local English Wiktionary Administrator. Projects in which he has been active include Czech entries and Wikisaurus. He often engages in policy making, discussion and votes.

Dan Polansky started editing in 2006. Numbers according to the Wikimedia stats page, as of July 2016: main namespace edits = 83,314; other namespace edits = 25,816.

He has chosen to decline previous nominations to become an administrator, in past years. This appears to be the full list of nominations:

 * User talk:Dan Polansky/2008
 * User talk:Dan Polansky/2009
 * User talk:Dan Polansky/2010 → old vote
 * User talk:Dan Polansky

In the nomination discussions, some people appeared to be looking forward to see him as an administrator. This is one of those cases when you might be surprised to learn that the person is not an administrator already. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 12:48, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

 * Vote starts: as soon as the nomination is accepted
 * Vote ends: 23:59, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Acceptance: I accept. I pledge to give up my admin rights in future if there is no longer consensus to support continuing adminship; thus, if a future vote to confirm my adminship yields no consensus, I shall cease to be an admin.
 * Languages: cs-N, en-3, de-2, sk-1, ru-1
 * Timezone: UTC+1, in Summer UTC+2.
 * Dan Polansky (talk) 12:59, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Support

 * 1)  --Daniel Carrero (talk) 13:02, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
 * 2)  "This is one of those cases when you might be surprised to learn that the person is not an administrator already" — totally. I think Dan is sometimes a little inflammatory but he makes good decisions and isn't as awful as me. Equinox ◑ 13:06, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
 * 3)  I often disagree with Dan, and often find him to be unreasonably scared of change, but I see no reason whatever not to trust him with the tools. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 15:20, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
 * 4)  Daniel is like a Czechoslovak robot who doesn't understand that the rules can sometimes be bent, but we need his stickler attitude to counterbalance more unruly Wiktionarians. --Vahag (talk) 16:04, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you. My support of keeping translation target entries despite CFI shed some doubt on the above diagnosis but I sure am pretty adamant when it comes to consensus and modifying policy pages only via votes. --Dan Polansky (talk) 07:13, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I support modifying policy pages only via votes. Last year, I tried editing WT:EL by myself, and Dan Polansky asked the policy to be reverted to the previous version. After that, I created most policy votes in the last year, and was able to get a good chunk of WT:EL voted and approved in the meantime. It takes much more work, and time, to create votes for policy changes than simply editing the policy with abandon or with a small discussion, and policy votes fail more often than I would be comfortable with. But when a vote passes above the 2/3 threshold, then we have a clear consensus. In other words, the voted and approved rules are more reliable, lessening the danger of the policy being malleable and changing whenever a given person wants. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 19:15, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * 1)  (though partly because I thought he was already an admin, not because I have a strong opinion either way--in other words, count my vote as an abstension if the vote barely passes). per Equinox and Angr.  Andrew Sheedy (talk) 03:46, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * 2)  per Angr and Equinox —suzukaze (t・c) 05:37, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * 3)  To counterbalance Lenka64's vote. (For the record, Dan Polansky is definitely not a troll nor has he ever been. His discussion contributions to Czech and Slovak Wiktionaries are substantial. Lenka and her friends managed to delete all images from Czech and Slovak Wiktionaries without never having reached any consensus for that. The leader of this clique, Danny B. has been recently desysoped on Czech Wiktionary. Lenka is just trying to take revenge here. Other members of this clique are likely to follow...) --Auvajs (talk) 22:16, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
 * User:Auvajs is multisuckpuppet from cs wiki supported by Dan Polansky. --Lenka64 (talk) 06:38, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
 * For the reader: Yes, but in 2006 and on a different project (cs.wp). As a sidenote, cs.wp ArbCom decided (2013) Lenka64 was a "notorious, verbally aggressive editor" --Auvajs (talk) 20:22, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
 * User:Lexiq was your suckpuppet 2014/2015 on cs wikt.... --Lenka64 (talk) 05:28, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
 * So can you link to any edits where I used this account to deceive or mislead other editors, disrupt discussions, distort consensus, avoid sanctions, evade blocks, or otherwise violate community standards and policies and not to have a clean start under a new name? ;) Again, as a sidenote, you are using several accounts too. Better speaking, you are being verbally aggressive on several accounts at the same time. --Auvajs (talk) 08:33, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Your answers are manipulative ....and Dan Polansky is probably out.... --Lenka64 (talk) 08:44, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
 * No links? No evidence? So you are just lying. User Lexiq was not a sockpuppet. For the record the actual reason I used a new account was to avoid harassment from you and your friends. You and your friends are harassing users who oppose you on several projects. Dan Polansky is one of your victims.--Auvajs (talk) 09:20, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
 * rofl.... --Lenka64 (talk) 09:33, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
 * This is irrelevant to this vote, but anyway: Auvajs is an interesting editor. In his youth, he engaged in massive sockpupetting and disruptive behavior in the Czech Wikipedia. However, he ceased and, in recent time, he did excellent work in bringing consensus-based voting processes into the Czech Wiktionary. Just recently, he nearly made it to be elected as an admin: cs:Wikislovník:Správci/Žádost o práva správce Auvajs. In that vote, the opposing voter Dubicko is Lenka64. --Dan Polansky (talk) 22:08, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Re: "To counterbalance Lenka64's vote". If it's true that some opposing votes were unfair for one reason or another, bear in mind that the vote needs a 2/3 majority to pass, so 2 support votes are needed to counterbalance 1 oppose vote. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 18:07, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
 * 1)  Dan gets a lot of flak for things which I don't think he deserves. He is possibly the best force for good on this project that I have seen yet, and I'm amazed that nobody's thought to help improve that before. — ObſequiousNewt — Geſpꝛaͤch — Beÿtraͤge 05:38, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
 * To clarify: I think there's a recurring pattern of people (and not just on enwikt) who make edits that run afoul of the consensus, and often the rules, and get into conflicts with people who can't be bothered to be polite about it, and then the former goes off and complains about how the latter was rude to them. The word 'harassment' is often used. I don't interact with a lot of people here, it is true, but it seems evident that DP belongs to the latter group, and a lot of the flak he gets comes from the former, and while I can't condone rudeness I also can't condemn it in the face of certain behavior. I did oppose Romanophile's nomination largely on the grounds of 'causticity', but I also said that causticity wasn't enough for me to clearly object to adminship, and I stand by both of these statements. Looking at Romanophile's contribs page I didn't see many positive and useful contributions. DP I am much more inclined to support. For example:
 * JohnC5 mentioned below one time in which DP challenged our orthographic standards for Ancient Greek. I distinctly remember this incident (link) and I rememember my initial knee-jerk reaction of "how dare you, you come into our Houſe, you ſhit on our orthographick Conſenſus, you ſhit on everything we ſtand for" but then eventually realized that, no, he did have some good points. He told us that we were doing it poorly, and could do it better, and I think he was right at least in some areas, and I'm thankful to him for that. I only wish the vote was better designed (because, honestly, that was not a good way to design a vote, and I wish people in general would stop doing it like that.) Anyone who is inclined to poke about with a stick may well have a better stick for poking with, in my view. — ObſequiousNewt — Geſpꝛaͤch — Beÿtraͤge 17:47, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Also: I don't know where the idea that he disregards the rules came from at all. Rather the converse, I find he is too tied to the rules, although that's largely just me hating the concept of votes, which I feel are honestly a terrible way to run things. — ObſequiousNewt — Geſpꝛaͤch — Beÿtraͤge 18:17, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
 * , precisely per Aɴɢʀ. At the end of the day this discussion is about whether to give a very active editor a mop with which to do more work. bd2412 T 19:31, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
 * 1)  —msh210℠ (talk) 20:57, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1)  —CodeCat 13:09, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
 * , because he has a history of driving productive users off the project for good. With admin rights, he will be able to do this even more effectively, which is very worrying. I trust him not to do anything worse than bite the newbies, but he bites hard, and we need newbies rather badly. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 19:03, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) . As Meta notes, Dan has driven off some prolific editors (Speednat comes to mind), and this community has had several discussions about how biteyness leads to us having a small editor base; we even just had two different BP discussions about admins whose attitudes have led to editors leaving. (Conversely, he opposed blocks of some not-so-active but persistently-problematic editors — the paranoiac Srebrenica POV-pusher comes to mind.) I also find Dan to be obstructionist; his efforts to insist on votes for things like improvements to template functions are, as one of our more colourful editors said in the past, bureaucratic masturbation, and the tendency to switch to votes when discussion is moving towards a result he dislikes is an effort to move the goalposts and subject changes which may have majority support to higher thresholds and procedural hurdles in an effort not dissimilar to the way a filibuster vs cloture works. I don't think such a bitey and obstructionist person should be in charge of issuing blocks and page protection. - -sche (discuss) 19:43, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I'd like to see some evidence of the "the tendency to switch to votes when discussion is moving towards a result he dislikes is an effort to move the goalposts and subject changes which may have majority support to higher thresholds and procedural hurdles". Specifically, I'd like to see specific examples and to know what he should have done differently in your opinion.
 * There are a few ongoing votes right now that were created by Dan Polansky, about using and  in basically all entries, and a vote concerning the exact name of /. I'm glad he created those, otherwise some major changes could have been done after mere quick discussions with few people. But if you are thinking of other examples that I didn't mention, we can discuss those too. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 20:28, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
 * For the reader: Wiktionary talk:Votes/sy-2016-08/User:Dan Polansky for admin. --Dan Polansky (talk) 06:31, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * And Dan played a large part in driving away Kephir, among others (but I'm sure he'll come up with reasons for being rude to everybody). —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 06:38, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * For the reader: Wiktionary talk:Votes/sy-2016-08/User:Dan Polansky for admin. --Dan Polansky (talk) 06:49, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * : . Wyang (talk) 05:31, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * 1)  Lenka64 (talk) 11:21, 27 August 2016 (UTC)... bad experience with his trolling on sk wikt... --Lenka64 (talk) 12:12, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * The reader will be probably interested in some background. I contributed a bit to removal of the rule of a very iron fist clique of Czech Wiktionary admins most conspicuously noted for wholesale removal of images from the Czech Wiktionary. The non-consensual wholesale removal of images from the Czech Wiktionary was led by the above Lenka64. --Dan Polansky (talk) 11:45, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * The indef on Slovak Wiktionary was given by JAn Dudík, for "intimidating behavior/harassment". JAn Dudík is part of the said clique. I tried to prevent non-consensual removal of images also from Slovak Wiktionary, but that did not work well. Slovak contributors are now protesting the image removals but to no avail. I cannot do anyting to help them; I am indefinitely blocked and I have blocked access to my talk page there. Incidentally, this relates to the conversation I was having on the talk page of this vote with Vahag about different cultures and their attitude to proper government and free speech. The English Wiktionary is extremely tolerant of a great variety of speech, as far as I can judge and compare. --Dan Polansky (talk) 12:23, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Slovak contributors are now protesting.. = 1 or 2 contributors... --Lenka64 (talk) 12:40, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * To be fair, the Slovak Wiktionary does not appear to have a lot of contributors. -Xbony2 (talk) 23:19, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
 * yes.. but majority is against "wild" pictures.... --Lenka64 (talk) 06:44, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Links to past discussion would be appreciated ^_^ -Xbony2 (talk) 11:19, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
 * 1)  - He makes great contributions, I will say. But he has a history of flaming and offending users inappropriately. I totally get it, everybody has bad days. But I feel like I couldn't trust him with the admin tools; what if one of those bad days led to the deletion of the main page again, for instance, or some other misuse of the tools as a personal attack method? Now, I'm not saying I'm the perfect person here; I'm certainly not. I've made many mistakes myself, and my lack of maturity shows pretty clearly at times. That's why I haven't even asked to be admin. It's because I'm much more prone to mistakes with the admin tools than other editors here. I'd rather just stay a regular user. I certainly can't say I haven't trolled here myself, but I believe I tend to stay away from personal attacks. Anyway, anyway, I got off-topic here. Dan Polansky doesn't personal attack here that often as it seems, but he's done it to me once, and as it seems Romanophile and other users. I will say this; I think most of the time his admin powers will be used for good, but on one of those bad days I speak of...I fear it. Philmonte101 (talk) 14:10, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Also, I forgot to mention that during discussions, I've seen him saying somewhat derogatory things about other people's ideas in a quite unprofessional manner. Such as "that's just complete rubbish" or saying other things that makes it clear that he thinks that the user's well thought idea is idiotic, even when other people support the idea or at least partially support it. This is another thing that, as said by other users above, has the potential of driving newbies and active users away. Philmonte101 (talk) 14:13, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I find the above concern with deleting the main page really far fetched; and even if that happened, the main page would get quickly restored, right? Also, the above user notified Romanophile who he knew had a conflict with me, in, which seems less than proper to me. --Dan Polansky (talk) 20:16, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Like I said, this isn't about me! It's about you. And FYI, before Wonderfool went on a vandalism streak, he acted like pretty much all the other admins here. As I've read, nobody had any suspicion whatsoever that he'd go batshit insane like that. My point? The point is, anything could happen. Therefore, I feel like an administrator should be someone who can be completely trusted with the tools to the extent that the majority of the users know. I don't think either you or I should have the tools. Go a couple of years or more without any personal attacks, or a little extent of those, and I'd change my mind about your capability of using the admin tools.
 * I want to let you know that out of all the things I am saying, I am not trying to give a personal attack myself. I'm just giving my personal opinion; I don't trust you to use the tools properly.
 * Okay, so you want a concrete better example. Okay, I'll give you one that seems like it could be common here. Okay, so let's say you have a conflict with someone here. So you get mad and want to flame them. Then you block them (for a bad reason, such as, let's say, the fact that you and them have a difference in opinion) Now you may think a bad block would be reverted by an admin quickly. But this doesn't always happen. A block that says something such as "intimidating behavior/harassment", "vandalism", etc. could easily be overlooked, as I feel. Now, I don't know if this is exactly what would happen, but this is one of the things I fear. Philmonte101 (talk) 23:17, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Um, that's still a thing you made up in your head. A "concrete example" is one that actually exists. You don't have to take part in every discussion just because it's there. Equinox ◑ 02:09, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
 * There; see the diff, I changed it. Philmonte101 (talk) 03:32, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
 * On another note, the reason I don't think I'd be suitable for adminship is because a lot of my edits, I have to admit, are done like ready, fire, aim. So I don't even trust myself to block people properly, or delete pages when they really should be deleted, etc. Philmonte101 (talk) 23:17, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I am only one person's opinion. Other people may oppose him for different reasons, but I feel I've made my statement. Philmonte101 (talk) 23:21, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I agree that that notification was improper. On Wikipedia, selectively notifying users with a particular point of view about a discussion is explicitly prohibited (w:WP:VOTESTACK). We don't seem to have a specific policy about it here, but I don't think it's appropriate. —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 23:29, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Can we please move on from that part now? It's done and over. I only notified one person anyway. This does not have to do with the vote itself. Philmonte101 (talk) 23:31, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Please deliver all the other comments you have about my "votestacking" to my talkpage or elsewhere. Philmonte101 (talk) 23:32, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * For the record, Philmonte101 sent my user page to RFDO as per User talk:Dan_Polansky/2014. She did so using their Ready Steady Yeti user. That was the occasion where Kephir indefinitely blocked me, and Rædi Stædi Yæti was there to add salt to wound, both in that RFDO and on my talk page. I recognize the user for what she is, and am not surprised to find her in the oppose section. --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:22, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
 * #adHominemAttackWithIntentToDiscredit — JohnC5 15:14, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Why does this all of a sudden have to be about me? We're talking about your adminship here. This has nothing to do with my decisions in the past. What do you think they're gonna do, scratch my vote and not count it? Philmonte101 (talk) 12:53, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Alright, I better shut up before we start a war here. Seriously, I'm not saying anymore in this discussion. I've said what I was going to say to share my personal opinion on the matter. I don't know how turning this on me and pointing out all my mistakes is appropriate. Do that some other time, like say, in an admin discussion for me if that ever (but very unlikely) comes around. I mean all of us can agree that both me and Dan want what's best for the project, even if we have a difference in opinion sometimes or if one of us or another does something wrong one day. So why not keep it that way, and let's pipe down. And on another note, Dan I apologize for rubbing salt into your wounds years ago. I admit, that wasn't right of me, as I wouldn't want somebody doing that to me either. Philmonte101 (talk) 13:08, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
 * It is because the above user is giving their "personal opinion on the matter", as they said, with no substantiation, that poiting out who the person is as I did is not the logical fallacy of ad hominem. What is not a fallacy of irrelevance is thereby not the fallacy of ad hominem. The validity of a piece of evidence is usually independent of the supplier but the validity of witness not so. --Dan Polansky (talk) 04:22, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Re: "all of us can agree that both me and Dan want what's best for the project": no, we can't. A person who still creates unattested entries after they've been here for over 2 years (since 9 May 2014) and who is repeatedly creating new accounts because they are bored with the old ones is not here for the best for the project. --Dan Polansky (talk) 06:14, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
 * User Philmonte101 was renamed to PseudoSkull, per "user request, name preference". --Dan Polansky (talk) 21:28, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
 * For the record, I did not use the pronoun "she"; that was changed by Philmonte. --Dan Polansky (talk) 23:36, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
 * 1)  strongly. Has no idea when to let go of an old grudge, and misbehaves persistently. -- Romanophile  ♞ (contributions) 17:41, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * On a side note, it seems that not even the supporters are enthusiastic about his adminship. Not a good sign. -- Romanophile ♞ (contributions) 17:46, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I am one of the supporters. I look forward to see Dan Polansky as an administrator. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 19:32, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * 1)  It's not personal – I actually have a great amount of respect for Dan and all his contributions, and I truly encourage him to keep up the good work. However, I agree with comments made by other users concerning his at times harsh attitude towards new editors, while he shows far more understanding for problematic editors. Scaring off productive editors and keeping the problematic ones is not the way to go if we want to maintain a high standard around here. --Robbie SWE (talk) 18:04, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * @Robbie SWE: I would appreciate if you could be specific about the productive contributors that you think I drove away. The problematic contributor that you would probably like to see gone is BAICAN XXX, a Romanian contributor to whom I seem to have successfully explained that only attested entries can be made. I am quite happy with my communication with the Romanian contributor, and actually think it is a good example of my sometimes succeeding in doing the opposite of what I am accused of, in this case explaning our policies to a contributor in a way that makes him to start to adhere to them without losing the ability to contribute by being blocked. --Dan Polansky (talk) 18:26, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Except that it didn't help. He just recently got back from being blocked for a month for adding bad entries, reference falsification and not communicating with other editors. During his block, Baican moved on to the German, Spanish, Italian and French Wiktionaries, causing just as much havoc – he's currently blocked in the German Wiktionary. Keeping this in mind, how have you been successful in reaching out to Baican? Honestly Dan, I understand your benevolence – if only I could be as benevolent. But reading through comments made here, it raises a lot of questions. As I said in the beginning, I have respect for all your efforts but do they make you worthy of adminship? I'm not convinced and it seems that I'm not alone. --Robbie SWE (talk) 18:42, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * @Robbie SWE: Now as before, I would appreciate if you could be specific about the productive contributors that you think I drove away. As for BAICAN, I see he was recently blocked by CodeCat without provision of any bad diffs; I do not know what edits he was blocked for. I feel an attempt to explain things to him was worthwhile, and does not suggest I am going to misuse admin tools. --Dan Polansky (talk) 18:56, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I see you have removed DEX from spionat that BAICAN created, and that could have been the alegged "reference falsification" that is in the block summary by CodeCat. spionat is an inflected form; it seems BAICAN thought reference was good enough as long as it found an entry for "spiona". That was less than perfect from BAICAN but not really reference falsification. If the things just said are examples of my being too benevolent, I guess I am guilty as charged; I do try to assume good faith and explain things to people. In fact, luckily enough, I do not need admin tools to continue doing so until the end. --Dan Polansky (talk) 19:03, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * @Dan Polansky: Looking at one (!) edit doesn't prove a point (Baican added an incorrect translation as late as yesterday, only two days after his block was lifted) – I have spent countless hours on several projects correcting his mistakes and trying to make him stop insulting and attacking others (most recently a global sysop). On a side note, I find it kind of amusing that you oppose the use of other languages on Wiktionary (as pointed out by Anatoli T), considering that you had no problems communicating in German with Baican on his talk page who until recently attested to having a level 2 understanding of English (which you took the liberty of downgrading yourself). If they have such a limited understanding of the official project language, why do you still deem them as trustworthy?
 * This is however neither the time nor the place to discuss Baican's participation – heaven knows he's already taken too much of my time and patience already. We're here to vote and discuss a potential adminship and you asked me to exemplify where your behaviour has driven off contributors. If I set aside Speednat and Kephir discussed previously, I have issues with the way you motivated your opposition to Romanophile's adminship. I'm well aware that Romanophile can fend for himself and that he doesn't need anyone standing up for him, although his sporadic participation lately has indeed worried me. If we disregard the history you two have with each other, would you mind explaining to me and to the community how your "[My] plan is to largely avoid interacting with the user lest I get into trouble" would work in reality? Being an admin implies that you at times have to work with bureaucrats, administrators and users who may strongly disagree with you. Can you allow yourself the luxury of not interacting with participants due to issues you might have with them? I'm worried that you might block someone on a whim and even if you end up regretting it, the damage would already be done. As I said before Dan – and it's worth repeating – I only have respect for everything you've accomplished and I hope we can continue to collaborate peacefully despite us having conflicting views in certain issues. --Robbie SWE (talk) 15:46, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
 * (outdent) @Robbie SWE: I responded at Wiktionary talk:Votes/sy-2016-08/User:Dan Polansky for admin, to make the discussion easier to follow. --Dan Polansky (talk) 21:51, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
 * 1)  In many cases, I understand Dan's struggle to fight in a world of madmen trying to trying to destroy the status quo ante. I would like to respond to the claim that he fiercely adheres to the rules. I have found in many instances that his understanding of parliamentary rules is contrary to the common practice and what is even feasible. For instance:
 * 2) Starting (I think) with my nomination and continuing for a couple thereafter, Dan attempted to adjoin a separate requirement on the ensysopment in a manner that was both unfair to the people up for election and impossible to execute from a policy standpoint. Again, I'm not saying term limits or something similar are a bad idea, but the continued insertion of side clauses as a way to sidestep the normal policy voting system represents an imperfect understanding of the rules.
 * 3) On several occasions, Dan has used specious status quo ante arguments born from his aesthetic views or a lack of knowledge concerning the field in question (e.g.). Status quo ante arguments are, of course, a warranted tool with in the structure of our debate, but I find that he often comes into topics that are not his area of expertise, claims that everything is being ruined and made hideous, and then disguises his opinion as tradition.
 * 4) Most troubling I find are the specious ad hominem  attacks that sometimes crop up in debate. In a few sentences in this discussion, Dan implied that ISMETA, Newt, and I are attempting to pervert the layout of entries due to our love of typography. I will freely admit to liking different forms of typography, but to use aesthetic views I espouse in my personal pages to discredit the longstanding practice for Latin and Greek entries is inappropriate. On other occasions, I have seen him claim that other users have agendas or biases which make their opinions irrelevant (I can't remember when, which will surely be used against this point, but my recollection stands). Of course everyone has an opinion, agenda, or bias which is why we debate issues. His aesthetic opinions mentioned are above perfectly understandable and legitimate, but they are his opinion. His dismissal of other contributors due to his feeling that they are biased represents a misunderstanding of how debate works.
 * Dan Polansky is a redoubtable contributor who makes numerous and excellent contributions to this project. I will admit that we have not always seen eye-to-eye on issues under discussion, but I feel that some of the descriptions that he is a “Czechoslovak robot who doesn't understand that the rules can sometimes be bent” misrepresent the many occasions when he has intentionally bent or subverted the rules for his own agenda. I'm not saying that having and agenda is wrong or that rules always bear absolute adherence, but he sometimes disguises his opinion as the spirit or letter of the law. This sort of mercurial interpretation of rules does not become one with the power to block other users. I hope that the above statements do not read as screed, as I do not mean to insult Dan, but I do not support his nomination. — JohnC5 18:10, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * As for "the many occasions when he has intentionally bent or subverted the rules for his own agenda": I do not know what you mean. Do you mean my support of translation target entries despite CFI? As for "adjoin a separate requirement on the ensysopment", this did not violate any rule that I know of, only a rule that you claim there is, but one that is not a policy of Wiktionary. You seemed to claim conditional votes in a vote are inapropriate, which did not seem right to me, and which I have shown runs counter to Wiktionary practice. Anyway. --Dan Polansky (talk) 18:21, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * As for "claim that other users have agendas or biases which make their opinions irrelevant": I am not aware of any such thing. I do not remember to have used the word "agenda", but I may be wrong. I do not remember claiming someone's argument should be ignored because of who they are, but I might have made an error there since it is all too easy and tempting; yet I do not remember the error. --Dan Polansky (talk) 18:34, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * For reference, the translation targets discussion is one that has never interested me and of which I have little knowledge. For the conditional voting, I misspoke if I implied that conditional voting itself is verboten (though I do think the current system should be either stopped or altered). As in the arguments given previously, I meant that your insertion of conditions that could be used as policy instead of implementing a policy directly is out of order. That is to say, by inserting a clause in someone's nomination that you can later call for reëlection, you would be trying to create a precedent which would either be unfair to that particular admin (as (s)he would have a separate clause applying on only that ensysopment) or would allow you to expand the calls for reëlection generally (which would be a change in policy, which should be executed through a policy vote). The argument here is that you've tried either to impose unfair burdens on specific users or policy changes through the power of conditional voting, which I find to be undesirable (my opinion).
 * As for the agendas and biases point, we are at somewhat of an impasse of poor recollection. Since you are innocent until proven guilty, I shall let the general point be stricken until more evidence may surface. The specific example in which you spoke against ISMETA, Newt, and me shall remain as an example of (in my opinion) poor judgment and poor tact. — JohnC5 19:21, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * @John: Would you admit that you were and are here superimposing a rule on me that I do not recognize to be a rule, one that is nowhere written and that is not part of my awareness of propriety? Do you also admit that the same complaint you made was made by one more editor, maybe two more, but I received no other complaint in that regard? I deliberated on your would-be rule and found it inapplicable and wrong. Therefore, I do not see this as bending and circumventing any policies. I do not know why you have provided so many general accusations without substantiation with examples; it feels really inappropriate. --Dan Polansky (talk) 19:29, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * No. Just because a rule does not exist explicitly does not mean that parliamentary procedure is being broken. Inserting kill pills in votes is always bad in any circumstance. My issue may appear abstruse until such time as you should try to enforce your condition. I count 4 others (ISMETA, MetaKnowledge, DCDuring, and Angr) who have raised concerns in part or in whole with your tactic. I have also, in each case provided examples, which you may dismiss, but which I feel fully demonstrate my arguments. To be clear, I do not admit to and do furthermore reject both of your above claims. — JohnC5 19:53, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * My bad; these were more people than I remember. I am certain we had debate on this and I had tried to explain my position and respond to your concerns. By the way, I tried to find and did not find anything. It is possible that I have a poor understanding of "parliamentary procedure" but it is also possible for you to be wrong. Be it as it may, I have not violated a written rule of Wiktionary or one supported by demonstrable consensus. --Dan Polansky (talk) 20:01, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * As for the specific example you mentioned, the first relevant statement is "The templates are not evidence supporting the claim that the macron information is very important; they only show proclivities of those who created and support the templates." The question is whether I have engaged in a fallacy of irrelevance. I am not sure. If I have not engaged in a fallacy of irrelevance, then I have not enganged in a fallacy of ad hominem since that is a fallacy of irrelevance. It still seems to me that the typographic proclivities of the editors under discussion did have bearing on the templates under discussion, and on what these template were evidence of. Here again a link. --Dan Polansky (talk) 19:42, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Well, rereading the above, I'd say, indeed: if some editors have a certain proclivity toward typographic ornament beyond the mundane, then these editors' creating templates with macrons is not much of evidence to support the claim that the macron is important. If the very same templates with macrons were created by editors without a proclivity for typographic ornament, than the templates having macron would be more of evidence to support macron being important. No fallacy of irrelevance here, and in fact no personal attack as far as I can see. --Dan Polansky (talk) 19:50, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Whether comment was irrelevant or not, I feel that it was disrespectful and meant to discredit your opposition. In any case, I have said my piece here. I cannot guarantee that I won't jump back in later, but I see little point in debating these points further. — JohnC5 19:53, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * But my point was relevant. It was meant to show that using the templates as evidence of macron being important was wrong. I encourage the reader to read the linked discussion if having enough time. The discussion in section Rationale for opposition starts with a listing of specific points and is only later concerned with the templates. I did not mean to wholesale discredit the opposition, but rather to discredit the specific argument that the templates are evidence. I hope that is apparent from the discussion linked. --Dan Polansky (talk) 20:01, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * 1)  Echoing what others have said . DonnanZ (talk) 23:52, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * He does use the rhetoric of asking someone to admit things often, doesn't he (going back at least to this discussion)? An interesting linguistic practice. I wonder how often people admit to his suppositions. — JohnC5 00:38, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Well yes, Votes/pl-2014-03/Unified Norwegian endend up 6:6, no consensus. After that, you went and converted single-Norwegian entries to split-Norwegian entries in volumes. If you feel disgruntled about this, I cannot help it. I don't think what you did is anything you can be proud of and my attempt to stop this via discussion anything I should be ashamed of. --Dan Polansky (talk) 07:18, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
 * An interesting thing is that Beer_parlour/2014/March showed 8.5 for support and 2 for oppose. For some reason, voters weakened their stances in the vote as contrasted to Beer parlour. --Dan Polansky (talk) 07:25, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
 * The fact that DP is not an admin already (but acts like one) doesn't justify the pressure he has put on various users, including myself when I was still a relative newbie. Therefore I consider him to be unfit for adminship. DonnanZ (talk) 11:10, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
 * 1)   Don't use languages other than English on user talk pages, D.P. will get you, especially if he thinks you're plotting something illegal - e.g. soliciting opinions, LOL. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 01:16, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Quoting Mr. Granger: "On Wikipedia, selectively notifying users with a particular point of view about a discussion is explicitly prohibited (w:WP:VOTESTACK)." I recall you selectively soliciting votes from users supportive of your view, doing so not only in English but also in Russian. I thought it would be only proper if that soliciting was done in English so that everyone could see what it was. If that request made you disgruntled, I will have to learn to live with consequences of my actions, in this case just actions as far as I can tell. I recall you took multiple other things I said to you personally, so you will oppose for other reasons as well; I remember pointing out that taking example sentences from other dictionaries word-for-word was a copyright violation, which you seemed to take as a personal attack, whereas my point was to bring the point across and stop the practice. As for "soliciting opinions, LOL" in relation to votes, that again is not an occasion for LOL. --Dan Polansky (talk) 07:18, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Examples of what look like soliciting is and ; probably in Ukrainian and not Russian. It is not soliciting for vote but for a Beer parlour discussion, but that discussion alone can lead to people starting to do something, in this case add definitionless Ukrainian entries, which was a subject to controversy. Admittedly, the cited posts have an English title, at least. An example of post that did not have an English title is ; probably no soliciting here but the problem is that it is not obvious. I think my post to your talk page  was reasonably polite and made a reasonable request in the context of your posting soliciting edits in a language other than English. --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:08, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Just to clarify - I didn't take personally your request to not use word-for-word citations, this request is perfectly OK. It's the way you communicate, which pushes away people - very unfriendly, almost hostile. Somehow you're always there if someone "needs" to be punished or bullied. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 09:16, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Maybe so, but I need examples to learn from. Like, did show manner that was "very unfriendly, almost hostile"? Since that is the diff that you supplied as your evidence. Does anyone else find that diff unfriendly or hostile? How would other people formulate that diff to make it more friendly? --Dan Polansky (talk) 09:25, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I have no intention to rub it in. Other editors have already provided some evidence in that respect. I just chose to show the post where you demanded the use of English in a multilingual environment, which nobody mentioned earlier. I still think it was very wrong of you. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 10:10, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Was the post hostile or was it not? I still don't know. I still do not see why it was wrong; I explained above why I still think the post was a good idea, and you have not explained why posting soliciting posts in Ukrainian when both the poster and the recipient know English is a commendable practice. I don't see you responding to substance, and with argument. --Dan Polansky (talk) 10:22, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
 * As for "you demanded": I posted "I would like to ask you to post in English whenever you post to multiple editors something that looks like soliciting opinions or input to a discussion. ..." Does that sound like demanding? Someone please correct me or explain that to me. --Dan Polansky (talk) 10:35, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Dan Polansky asked specific questions as to whether his post was hostile or not. I can't read Atitarev's mind, but I'll try to formulate a plausible hypothesis. Maybe Atitarev felt, on the grounds of free speech, that it is not in one's place to criticize how another person wants to communicate. Maybe Atitarev felt that one person saying "when communicating with other people, use only the language chosen by me" (even though this is the English Wiktionary) is as silly and inappropriate as saying "I counted the letters in your post, and it was an odd number; that makes me uncomfortable, please only send messages to other people with an even number of letters in the future".
 * "I would like to ask you" was polite of Dan Polansky. If he said: "Do you think you could?" (I mean: "Do you think you could refrain from posting in English whenever you post to multiple editors something that looks like soliciting opinions or input to a discussion?"), it would be even more polite because that question would actively seek confirmation from Atitarev, the person that would choose to accept or decline the request. But I admit it's a hair-splitting difference, and worrying about it would be walking on eggshells. Dan Polansky actually did not demand the use of English as he was accused of.
 * At the moment, I seem to be the only other person weighing in against a few bad accusations. (not counting the fact that Dan Polansky is defending himself), in my opinion, it is unbecoming to oppose a sysop vote while linking to a petty disagreement from 2 years ago as the opposing reason. Suppose we had the rule that any sysop who ever found himself in any form of conflict whatsoever against another user loses their admin rights. Many of us would have to lose the tools. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 13:49, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
 * My reason for voting against is not about the "petty disagreement" but inappropriate demand (request, if you wish) and nominee's character. Some editors chose not to give their reasons at all. You don't have to. Echoing other editors' reasons. You don't need to ask me further. I'm not going to search for all discussions where DP gave me or other people hard time or was unfair to people. I've know DP long enough to make an opinion. It's my opinion, right or wrong. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 02:28, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
 * For the record, I don't mind that the diff is 2 years old. If two years ago I did something improper, I find it okay to be presented, at least an example of what someone means by "bad behavior". I am just having hard time finding the post under discussion improper; I still think it is soliciting votes in Ukrainian that is improper, and it does not seem that Anatoli sees that. On a related note, the failure to respond to my questions, which I think were reasonable, raises questions as to whether the case is strong, as is the evasive talk about no need to state reasons; since that suggests that articulable reasons are lacking, and that is no good sign for a substance-based conversation, and indeed, substance-based decision making. --Dan Polansky (talk) 21:33, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
 * (outdent) Let me make a rather unrelated note: By the pledge to give up my admin rights in future if there is no longer consensus to support continuing adminship, I reduce the risks associated with my being admin since I can then be quite easily desysopped in case some bad behavior develops. And I am the first to admit that putting into power all too often breeds corrupt behaviors. --Dan Polansky (talk) 21:37, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
 * 1)  — Jberkel (talk) 03:27, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
 * 2)  When I was newer and just starting to use Wiktionary (this is less than two months ago), but still working my way around figuring out the status quo and thus not making many contributions other than requests, he noted (nicely at first) on my talk page that requests weren't useful (in his opinion). When I responded with an explanation that I was using the information from the requests and intended to make more contributions in the future, and also noted that some requests did get filled rather quickly, he stated "I'm glad you feel you are making a "contribution"". The sudden change in attitude startled me and prompted a rougher response from me, to which he responded "And I don't appreciate editors filling Wiktionary with pointless requests, especially by people who seem to have nothing else to contribute." Those statements made me feel less welcome and I was afraid of starting to make larger edits (such as creating pages) because I felt like I would be scrutinized instead of getting pointers in how to improve. I understand that he has made many contributions to Wiktionary over the years, but I feel that someone who is not welcoming and instead harsh to new editors does indeed drive away people (I was actually going to stop editing altogether, even if it was a small thing, as I get anxiety when in new communities, but an admin stepped in and gave me a few pointers, which, contrary to Dan Polansky's approach, made me feel more confident asking for help and making larger contributions). With the title of admin it would make the driving-away effect even stronger as the weight of his words increase. AtalinaDove (talk) 17:15, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
 * I guess I was more rude than I needed to be, but it was in response to what I considered to be rude behavior: When someone starts their editing on the project by indiscriminate injection of requests for pronunciation, I find that rude. When that person continues by "contributing" petty manual template replacements that could very easily be done by bots, I actually find my initial guess about the character of the person's contribution confirmed. There's so much reader-visible non-bottable useful work to be done on this project, but some people are happy enough to "make edits". --Dan Polansky (talk) 21:22, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
 * : I have something to say in defense of : She did her first edit on July 4, and your conversation with her was on July 15. As a new user, she stated that she did not know about, the template that generates Hungarian pronunciation automatically. There's no reason to assume, either, that she should have known that the template is easilly bottable.
 * If you already knew of at the time when you first said "Greetings, I for one do not think they are very helpful." in July 4, then you failed to say: "There is a template named . It adds the Hungarian pronunciation automatically."
 * If you, Dan Polansky, did not know of before, (which is within the realm of possibility) then at least you certainly came to know the template once AtalinaDove started to use it, otherwise you could not have been bothered by her edits. In this case, you failed to say: "Please don't add  to many entries. It is easily bottable." --Daniel Carrero (talk) 22:17, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
 * I did not know of hu-IPA. Changes like are obviously bottable: no information is being added to the markup. I don't really find it wrong to add hu-IPA, though, in contrast to adding IPA requests for Norwegian indiscriminately; it's just that it tells you something about the sort of editing that you can expect. --Dan Polansky (talk) 22:22, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
 * On a related note, would not it be more useful for the reader if hu-IPA was added where pronunciation is missing rather than being placed to entries that already have pronunciation? That's pretty obvious, isn't it? Now, you might think I should post it to the user talk page. Maybe so, but we have to ask whether contributors should show an elementary capacity to giving thought to what they are doing and why they are doing it. --Dan Polansky (talk) 22:31, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
 * To my defense on the template replacements (like ), Panda10 actually suggested that I do this on my talk page, as it was a task that needed to be done. Therefore, I have been going through the 32,000+ Hungarian entries with IPA pronunciation and checking them all to see that they have the right template. I am also converting the old Hungarian declension templates to the new one as I go, and expanding and adding information if I can. With my limited knowledge of Hungarian, this is the best I can do right now, but I have made thousands of these edits, and there is currently no bot that seems to be doing this. --AtalinaDove (talk) 00:39, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the Panda10 mention. I apologize for the above unnecessary critical words about bot-like contributions. Sometimes, a human manually doing bot-like edits is better than nothing. --Dan Polansky (talk) 07:44, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
 * You may think that adding is bottable, but it is not. There are words where a human editor must provide phonetic respelling as an input parameter to make the output look right. As for replacing the existing IPA with the template, it is also very useful and necessary because the template contains several improvements in pronunciation, and as a result, can use [] instead of //. --Panda10 (talk) 17:23, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
 * @Panda10: Okay. How is someone who does not know any Hungarian going to know which already entered pronunciations can be replaced with and which cannot, as per "there are words where a human editor must provide phonetic respelling as an input parameter to make the output look right"? --Dan Polansky (talk) 17:34, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Atalina compares the original IPA and the templated IPA, if the two are different, she leaves a note. Also, as I mentioned on Atalina's talkpage, I patrol her work. --Panda10 (talk) 17:40, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you; makes sense. --Dan Polansky (talk) 17:43, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
 * (outdent) For the record, I rest my case that the diff in question was bottable as long as the diff was part of the process described above, namely, compare the IPA in the entry with the IPA produced by the template and if the two IPAs are same, replace the original template with the new template. Not that it matters, but anyway. --Dan Polansky (talk) 18:01, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
 * 1)  — He makes a lot of great contributions to the Czech part of Wiktionary, but he can be hard to deal with. — V-ball (talk) 07:23, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
 * 2)  — Panda10 (talk) 17:26, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Abstain

 * 1)  Octahedron80 (talk) 06:46, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * 2)  This is the most votes I've seen in two days :P -Xbony2 (talk) 20:53, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * 3)  I'm unsure. --WikiTiki89 11:28, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
 * 4)  – I think Dan has good intentions, but he does not phrase things well, so he often causes offense. For instance, when he requested that Atitarev post in English, not Ukrainian or Russian, he said he "opposes" posting in another language. I just don't understand that phrasing: it sounds like he's saying if you're posting in another language, you must be soliciting votes, and therefore it is always wrong. I would prefer to think he meant to say that it was unwise because most people don't speak those languages and they may misinterpret the situation. But the phrasing was so direct that he did not convey that idea. I don't want to vote against his nomination, because I think he has good intentions, but I do not want to vote for it, because he seems to lack diplomacy and I am not sure if that is a good quality in an admin. And I am not very experienced; this is my first admin vote on any Wikimedia project. — Eru·tuon 05:55, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
 * 5)  Dan's mainspace contributions are qualitatively and quantitatively miles ahead of many editors on this project. However, while some of the opposition seems less than fair, others (especially Wyang, AtalinaDove) have made me aware of certain points that are making it difficult for me to support this wholeheartedly. Be that as it may, I would still support giving him rollbacker privileges in a heartbeat, and template editor too if that becomes a thing. — Kleio (t · c) 18:13, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
 * as I'm not allowed to vote. --Q9ui5ckflash (talk) 10:02, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm not even sure that you're allowed to abstain, I think abstain votes are taken into account. DonnanZ (talk) 10:55, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm striking the vote. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 12:51, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
 * 1)  My image of almost every editor here is that they are dutiful and businesslike people. I recently learn that Wiktionary is a lot more like a soap opera than I could have imagined. Korn [kʰũːɘ̃n] (talk) 22:22, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * I've been discovering the same of late. Guess Wiktionary isn't much unlike other internet communities in that regard. — Kleio (t · c) 22:43, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * The only difference is that we all care about the same cause, that of building a dictionary. As much as I might disagree with Dan, we both know that we both earnestly want to improve the project. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 23:13, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Decision
Failed: 10-15-6 (40.0%-60.0%) --Daniel Carrero (talk) 00:40, 26 September 2016 (UTC)


text: måleriet

title: måleriet


text:
倒刺

Noun

 * 1) hangnail
 * 2) barb

title: 倒刺


text:
肉刺

Noun

 * 1) hangnail protruding piece of nail tissue or skin near base of fingernail or toenail
 * 2) whitlow an infection under the cuticle of a fingernail or toenail

title: 肉刺


text: måleria

title: måleria


text:
tomomania

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) A morbid addiction to performing or undergoing surgery.

title: tomomania


text:
kraksna

Noun

 * 1)  clunker a decrepit motor car or other machine

title: kraksna


text:
User talk:Ospalh

Welcome Message
--Lo Ximiendo (talk) 13:02, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

title: User talk:Ospalh


text:
Ashwatthama

Etymology
From.

Proper noun

 * 1)  A hero in Mahabharata; son of Drona.

title: Ashwatthama


text: Category:Mongolian plural suffixes

title: Category:Mongolian plural suffixes


text:
अश्वत्थामन्

Etymology
From.

Proper noun

 * 1)  Name of a saint and warrior, the son of Drona in the Mahabharata.

title: अश्वत्थामन्


text: fire-power

title: fire-power


text: Category:Hungarian terms borrowed from Middle High German


text: world's tiniest violin

title: world's tiniest violin


text:
soijarouhekastike

Noun

 * 1) A sauce made with kibbled soy as main raw material.

Usage notes

 * The term "kibbled soy sauce" does not seem to be used in English. The English terms referring to soy-based sauces tend to be quite specific, in the way of "soy bolognese" or "soy garam masala". The term "soy sauce" has the same specific sense as Finnish.

title: soijarouhekastike


text:
предвестник

Etymology
From. Compare 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) harbinger, herald, precursor, forerunner

title: предвестник


text: Citations:taser

title: Citations:taser


text:
vilment

Etymology
.

Adverb

 * 1) vilely; in a vile, horrible way

title: vilment


text:
stampomania

Noun

 * 1) A passion for collecting postage stamps.

title: stampomania


text:
antenatus

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  stepson, stepchild
 * 2)  firstborn son, predecessor, ancestor

Descendants

 * Italo-Romance:
 * West Iberian:
 * Borrowings:
 * West Iberian:
 * Borrowings:
 * West Iberian:
 * Borrowings:
 * Borrowings:
 * Borrowings:
 * Borrowings:
 * Borrowings:
 * Borrowings:
 * Borrowings:
 * Borrowings:
 * Borrowings:
 * Borrowings:
 * Borrowings:

title: antenatus


text: scribbleomania

title: scribbleomania


text:
scribblemania

Noun

 * 1) A compulsion for writing.

title: scribblemania


text:
rinkomania

Noun

 * 1) A passion for roller skating on indoor rinks.

title: rinkomania


text:
fungl

Etymology
German

Adverb

 * 1)  wholly, entirely

title: fungl


text:
islomania

Noun

 * 1) A fascination with islands.

title: islomania


text:
politicomania

Noun

 * 1) A fascination with politics.

title: politicomania


text:
soimaus

Noun

 * 1) rebuke harsh criticism

title: soimaus


text:
eléboro

Etymology
, from, possibly from and.

Noun

 * 1) hellebore

title: eléboro


text:
phytomania

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  A fascination with plants.

title: phytomania


text:
soinnukkaasti

Adverb

 * 1) melodiously

title: soinnukkaasti


text:
soinnukkuus

Noun

 * 1) melodiousness

title: soinnukkuus


text:
photomania

Noun

 * 1) A fascination with photography.

title: photomania


text: Category:br:Metals

title: Category:br:Metals


text: sokeain

title: sokeain


text:
sokeainaakkoset

Noun

 * 1) braille alphabet

title: sokeainaakkoset


text:
sokeainkoulu

Noun

 * 1) school for the blind

title: sokeainkoulu


text:
phagomania

Noun

 * 1) A compulsion to eat.

title: phagomania


text:
pathomania

Noun

 * 1)  moral insanity; psychopathy

title: pathomania


text:
Graecomania

Noun

 * 1) A passion for Greece and its people and culture.

title: Graecomania


text:
хаг

Etymology 1
From, compare with 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) coating, crust
 * 2) lichen, moss
 * 3) dandruff
 * 4) slag
 * 5) placenta

Etymology 2
.

title: хаг


text: Category:Mongolian onomatopoeias

title: Category:Mongolian onomatopoeias


text:
tiegezh

Noun

 * 1) family
 * 2) household

title: tiegezh


text:
onychotillomania

Etymology
From (compare ) +  +.

Noun

 * 1) A compulsion for picking and tearing at one's fingernails or toenails.

Related terms

 * dermatillomania
 * trichotillomania

title: onychotillomania


text:
lous

Adjective

 * 1) dirty

Noun

 * 1) bear

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) louse insect in the order Psocodea
 * 2) A person or thing worthy of contempt or ostracism.

title: lous


text:
iĉeco

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  masculinity

title: iĉeco


text:
falskneri

Etymology
Possibly from older 🇨🇬

Noun

 * 1) a forgery

Etymology
Possibly from older 🇨🇬

Noun

 * 1) a forgery

title: falskneri


text:
ferret-legging

Noun

 * 1) The activity of keeping a live ferret in one's trousers for as long as possible.

title: ferret-legging


text:
pesketaer

Noun

 * 1) fisherman

title: pesketaer


text:
kazetenner

Noun

 * 1) journalist

title: kazetenner


text:
broust-dent

Noun

 * 1) toothbrush

title: broust-dent


text:
skrivagner

Noun

 * 1) writer

title: skrivagner


text:
yaouank

Etymology
From, from , from.

Adjective

 * 1) young

title: yaouank


text:
kanaouenn

Noun

 * 1) song

title: kanaouenn


text:
oligomania

Noun

 * 1)  A form of insanity which, although potentially affecting all the mental faculties and operations, apparently involves only a part as the emotions, the intellect, or the will.

title: oligomania


text:
limapulo

Numeral

 * 1)  fifty

title: limapulo


text:
Italomania

Noun

 * 1) A passion for Italy and its people and culture.

title: Italomania


text:
idolomania

Noun

 * 1)  A devotion to idols.

title: idolomania


text:
lulonan

Noun

 * 1) fontanelle

title: lulonan


text: visnes

title: visnes


text:
talakbong

Noun

 * 1) shroud

title: talakbong


text:
hysteromania

Noun

 * 1)  nymphomania
 * 2)  A condition involving both hysteria and mania.

Related terms

 * hysteromaniac
 * hysteromaniacal

title: hysteromania


text:
hysteromaniac

Noun

 * 1)  nymphomaniac

title: hysteromaniac


text:
talna

Noun

 * 1) peace; tranquility; serenity; calmness

title: talna


text: hysteromaniacs

title: hysteromaniacs


text:
hysteromaniacal

Adjective

 * 1)  nymphomaniac

title: hysteromaniacal


text:
tamay

Noun

 * 1) poison

Noun

 * 1) witchcraft

title: tamay


text:
vidviĉo

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  widower

Usage notes
The neologistic suffix is controversial, but even among its proponents the word vidviĉo is commonly not recommended. The word traditionally already means “widower” even without the addition of the masculine suffix, making the suffix redundant.

Many users of the term believe that the meaning of (and other gendered root words) should be changed to have a gender neutral meaning. Other people that actively use it do not aim to change the traditional meaning of “vidvo”, but think the redundancy of is preferable to the asymmetry between the forms  and.

See also Gender reform in Esperanto and its section Masculine suffixes on Wikipedia, and the article on -iĉ- in Esperanto.

title: vidviĉo


text:
hypermania

Noun

 * 1) An extreme form of mania.

Coordinate terms

 * hypomania

title: hypermania


text: coord

title: coord


text: coords

title: coords


text:
hylomania

Noun

 * 1) An obsession with matter or philosophical materialism.

title: hylomania


text: dānshēngǒu

title: dānshēngǒu


text:
ભેંસ

Etymology
, from. . Cognate with 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) buffalo

title: ભેંસ


text:
RAM-like

Adjective

 * 1) Resembling RAM (random access memory).

title: RAM-like


text:
混音版

Noun

 * 1)  remix

title: 混音版


text: hùnyīnbǎn

title: hùnyīnbǎn


text: dōngjiā

title: dōngjiā


text:
kwarta

Etymology
..

Noun

 * 1) quart
 * 2)  fourth

title: kwarta


text: dōngjia

title: dōngjia


text: falskneriet

title: falskneriet


text:
partamonni

Noun

 * 1) A fish of the genus Ancistrus in the catfish family.
 * 2)  The genus Ancistrus.

title: partamonni


text:
習作

Noun

 * 1) composition practice; essay response
 * 2) homework; practice

Verb

 * 1) to practice writing a composition or essay

title: 習作


text: 习作

title: 习作


text: xízuò

title: xízuò


text:
評說

Verb

 * 1) to comment; to evaluate

title: 評說


text: 评说

title: 评说


text: píngshuō

title: píngshuō


text:
心裁

Noun

 * 1) idea; conception; plan; plot

title: 心裁


text: 交响诗

title: 交响诗


text: gynaecomania

title: gynaecomania


text: jiāoxiǎngshī

title: jiāoxiǎngshī


text:
eulogomania

Noun

 * 1)  A passion for eulogy.

title: eulogomania


text:
kalaw

Noun

 * 1)  eyebrow

Noun

 * 1) the

Noun

 * 1) hornbill

Noun

 * 1) hornbill

Noun

 * 1) a hornbill, especially of the species

title: kalaw


text:
kalbo

Etymology
.

Adjective

 * 1) bald

Noun

 * 1) mullet fish

Etymology 1
.

Adjective

 * 1) bald; bald-headed
 * 2)  devoid of trees; cleared
 * 1)  devoid of trees; cleared

Adjective

 * 1) carried by the wind

Noun

 * 1) a butterfly

title: kalbo


text:
empleomania

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1)  The desire to obtain a government job.

title: empleomania


text:
sokkelopartamonni

Noun

 * 1) Ancistrus claro small South American catfish, kept as aquarium fish

title: sokkelopartamonni


text:
makanot

Adjective

 * 1) slippery

title: makanot


text:
polymania

Noun

 * 1)  total insanity, as contrasted with monomania
 * 2)  excessive enthusiasm for multiple things, as contrasted with monomania

title: polymania


text:
kulat

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) fungus

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) mushroom that grows from a dead tree

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) fungus; mushroom

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) fungus

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) a variety of fungus that usually grows on decaying wood

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) mushroom

title: kulat


text:
選購

Verb

 * 1) to select and purchase; to choose and buy

title: 選購


text:
kitatung

Noun

 * 1) mange; skin disease in which the skin is bumpy

title: kitatung


text: 选购

title: 选购


text: xuǎngòu

title: xuǎngòu


text:
kuditdit

Noun

 * 1) small mushroom that sprouts on dead trees

title: kuditdit


text:
хага

Adverb

 * 1)  asunder

title: хага


text:
kolkog

Adjective

 * 1) bald; bald-headed

title: kolkog


text:
malamsak

Adjective

 * 1) tasteless; bland; lacking salt

title: malamsak


text:
lattag

Noun

 * 1) stomach; belly

title: lattag


text:
麵包皮

Noun

 * 1) crust of bread

title: 麵包皮


text: 面包皮

title: 面包皮


text: miànbāopí

title: miànbāopí


text:
ecdemomania

Noun

 * 1) A compulsion to go outside or to travel.

title: ecdemomania


text:
lasona

Noun

 * 1) onion

Noun

 * 1) garlic

title: lasona


text:
latugat

Noun

 * 1) disease; fever; long illness

title: latugat


text:
supercommuter

Noun

 * 1) Someone who has a very long commute, often to a different metropolitan area than the one they reside in.

title: supercommuter


text:
malapat

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) scorched; burnt

title: malapat


text:
lannag

Noun

 * 1) plain; level ground

title: lannag


text:
lendum

Noun

 * 1) shade

title: lendum


text:
lobugen

Noun

 * 1) lobster

title: lobugen


text:
choreomania

Etymology
From.

title: choreomania


text:
malogon

Adjective

 * 1) cheap; inexpensive; easy

title: malogon


text:
哽哽咽咽

Etymology
Reduplication of.

Idiom

 * 1) to choke with sobs

title: 哽哽咽咽


text:
maloku

Adjective

 * 1) harmful; crazy

title: maloku


text: gěnggěngyèyè

title: gěnggěngyèyè


text:
malongsot

Adjective

 * 1) spoiled; rotten (as of fruit)

title: malongsot


text:
malotlot

Adjective

 * 1) murky; turbid; unclear (as of water)

title: malotlot


text:
liyad

Adverb

 * 1) wind/wave in gusts

Noun

 * 1) lesson

Noun

 * 1) faraway place

Adjective

 * 1) bent backwards with the stomach jutting out

Noun

 * 1) bending of one's body backwards with the stomach jutting out

title: liyad


text: falsknerier

title: falsknerier


text: supercommuters

title: supercommuters


text:
malikon-likon

Adjective

 * 1) coiled; twisted; folded; rolled

title: malikon-likon


text:
maluket

Adjective

 * 1) muddy

title: maluket


text:
mabtong

Adjective

 * 1) deep (as of water)

title: mabtong


text:
maggas

Adjective

 * 1) spicy
 * 2) strong (as of liquor, tobacco, or coffee)

title: maggas


text: sourcers

title: sourcers


text:
makadaklan

Noun

 * 1) carabao; water buffalo

title: makadaklan


text:
makpal

Adjective

 * 1) many; much

title: makpal


text:
木槿

Noun

 * 1) hibiscus, especially

title: 木槿


text:
maslag

Adjective

 * 1) strong-flowing (as of a river)

title: maslag


text:
preretired

Adjective

 * 1) Not yet having retired from employment.

title: preretired


text:
mepodru

Noun

 * 1) island

title: mepodru


text:
preretiree

Noun

 * 1) A person who has not yet retired from employment.

title: preretiree


text: Category:Mongolian descriptive adverbs

title: Category:Mongolian descriptive adverbs


text: preretirees

title: preretirees


text: juvente

title: juvente


text:
minaddap

Adjective

 * 1) very beautiful

title: minaddap


text: fúróng

title: fúróng


text:
拒霜

Noun

 * 1)  cotton rose

title: 拒霜


text:
舜華

Noun

 * 1)  hibiscus
 * 2) rose of Sharon
 * 1) rose of Sharon

title: 舜華


text:
murok

Adjective

 * 1) sharp (of a point or end)

Etymology
Borrowed from a language. Compare 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1)  a genus of herbaceous plants of the family
 * 2)  carrot

title: murok


text: mùjǐn

title: mùjǐn


text: jùshuāng

title: jùshuāng


text: shùnhuá

title: shùnhuá


text: 舜华

title: 舜华


text:
ngangay

Noun

 * 1) old days; time long ago

Noun

 * 1) saliva

Noun

 * 1) saliva

title: ngangay


text:
平行線

Noun

 * 1) parallel line

title: 平行線


text: píngxíngxiàn

title: píngxíngxiàn


text: 平行线

title: 平行线


text:
ngitngit

Noun

 * 1) food stuck between teeth

Noun

 * 1) extreme or controlled anger
 * 2) change to bad weather

title: ngitngit


text: Category:Dupaningan Agta interjections

title: Category:Dupaningan Agta interjections


text:
感謝信

Noun

 * 1) letter of thanks; thank-you letter

title: 感謝信


text: 感谢信

title: 感谢信


text: gǎnxièxìn

title: gǎnxièxìn


text:
cledonism

Noun

 * 1) Divination through the interpretation of words (written or spoken) encountered by chance.

title: cledonism


text:
複雜化

Verb

 * 1) to complicate

title: 複雜化


text: 复杂化

title: 复杂化


text: fùzáhuà

title: fùzáhuà


text: cacodemonia

title: cacodemonia


text: falskneria

title: falskneria


text:
夠嗆

Adjective

 * 1)  terrible; unbearable
 * 2)  unlikely; hard to say
 * 3)  enough

title: 夠嗆


text:
pseudomanic

Adjective

 * 1)  Resembling mania.

title: pseudomanic


text: 够呛

title: 够呛


text: 夠戧

title: 夠戧


text: gòuqiàng

title: gòuqiàng


text:
pseudomania

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) compulsive lying
 * 2) A condition that resembles, but is not in fact, mania.

title: pseudomania


text:
пүнтүүз

Etymology
Borrowed from.

Noun

 * 1) cellophane noodle

title: пүнтүүз


text: 够戗

title: 够戗


text: falskneriene

title: falskneriene


text:
胃汁

Noun

 * 1)  gastric acid

title: 胃汁


text: wèiyì

title: wèiyì


text: wèiyè

title: wèiyè


text: wèisuān

title: wèisuān


text:
荒原

Noun

 * 1) wasteland; wilderness

Noun

 * 1) wilderness

title: 荒原


text: huāngyě

title: huāngyě


text: huāngyuán

title: huāngyuán


text: chūbǎnshè

title: chūbǎnshè


text:
出版物

Noun

 * 1) publication

Noun

 * 1) publication

title: 出版物


text: chūbǎnwù

title: chūbǎnwù


text:
書社

Noun

 * 1) publishing house; press
 * 2) bookshop; bookstore
 * 3)  reading group; literary club

Synonyms

title: 書社


text: shūshè

title: shūshè


text: 书社

title: 书社


text: 貓兒膩

title: 貓兒膩


text: 猫儿腻

title: 猫儿腻


text: Category:Chinese terms borrowed from Uyghur


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Uyghur

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Uyghur


text:
нийтгэх

Etymology
Old causative formation. The change >  being semi-regular due to  suffix having a variant in  after,  or ; and  clusters being regularly reflected as  in Khalkha.

Verb

 * 1) to weave

title: нийтгэх


text:
abaha

Noun

 * 1) shoulder

title: abaha


text: Category:Mongolian terms suffixed with -гах


text: akvarellen

title: akvarellen


text: pintmen

title: pintmen


text:
vidéki

Adjective

 * 1) rural of, or belonging to the countryside or province

Etymology 2
, dropping the possessive suffix.

Adjective

 * 1)   in/of/from the region or part of ……

title: vidéki


text: akvarellene

title: akvarellene


text: akvarellar

title: akvarellar


text: Category:it:Artists

title: Category:it:Artists


text: akvarellane

title: akvarellane


text: de-Islamises

title: de-Islamises


text: de-Islamising

title: de-Islamising


text: de-Islamised

title: de-Islamised


text: Template:R:TotfalusiNagyEty 2001

title: Template:R:TotfalusiNagyEty 2001


text:
sokkeli

Etymology
Borrowed from, from.

Noun

 * 1) foundation wall, plinth bottom course of stones, bricks or concrete supporting a wall
 * 2) plinth base or pedestal beneath a cabinet
 * 3) socle

title: sokkeli


text:
de-Islamize

Verb

 * 1)  To deprive of its Islamic character, or remove the Islamic aspect of.
 * 2)  To become un-Islamic.

Synonyms

 * de-Muslimize

title: de-Islamize


text: de-Islamizing

title: de-Islamizing


text: de-Islamized

title: de-Islamized


text: de-Islamizes

title: de-Islamizes


text:
de-Islamization

Noun

 * 1) The act or process of de-Islamizing.

title: de-Islamization


text: de-Islamisation

title: de-Islamisation


text: de-Islamification

title: de-Islamification


text: Category:Hungarian nouns suffixed with -dli


text:
de-energize

Verb

 * 1)  To remove the energy from (a circuit or a system).

title: de-energize


text: de-energizes

title: de-energizes


text: de-energizing

title: de-energizing


text: de-energized

title: de-energized


text:
vannfarge

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  watercolour (UK) or watercolor (US)
 * 2) the colour of the water, e.g. of the sea.

title: vannfarge


text: deenergise

title: deenergise


text: deenergises

title: deenergises


text: deenergising

title: deenergising


text: deenergised

title: deenergised


text: vannfargen

title: vannfargen


text:
User:LatinGuy87

Salve, this is LegoGuy87, I have been here for about a year. I am primarily going to edit pages concerning to Latin, Vulgar Latin, and Spanish for the most part. If anyone has questions concerning Vulgar Latin reconstructions or translating questions, you can always come to me for advice or help.

Future Indicative
In Latin, the Future Indicative tense was synthetic, formed by adding: -bo,-bis,-bit,-bimus,-bitis,-bunt in 1st and 2nd conjugations; & -am,-es,-et,-emus,-etis,-ent in 3rd and 4th conjugations.

With the loss of vowel length and betacism, these forms became somehard hard to distinguish with other tenses: some of the 1st and 2nd future conjugated forms became more similar if not outright homophonous to the perfect forms; if further reduced, they resemble the present forms:

The 3rd and 4th future conjugated forms became more similar to the present indicative forms with the help of collapse of vowel lengths and opening of the front close unrounded vowel; & the first person singular conjugation was already the same in spelling as the present subjunctive form (only distinguished by context): * vēndēmus (CL /weːnˈdeː.mus/ > PR /βenˈde.mʊs/) * vēndimus (CL /ˈweːn.di.mus/ > PR /ˈβen.de.mʊs/) (The only difference between these forms was the accent, but overtime the future forms pervailed over the present forms as the stress became predominately penultimate in Romance (this could also be influenced from the 2nd conjugation), the future quality got lost in this process. We see this exemplified in the fossilized form eres in Spanish [you are] from the Latin future eris [you will be])

With the fading of the synthetic forms, the future was rendered through periphrastic means, they were numerous even during the Classical era of the language:

title: User:LatinGuy87


text: vannfarger

title: vannfarger


text: vannfargene

title: vannfargene


text:
vassfarge

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  watercolour (UK) or watercolor (US)
 * 2) the colour of the water, e.g. of the sea

title: vassfarge


text:
Mutt

Etymology
From, from. Cognate with 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) courage

title: Mutt


text:
عالج

Verb

 * 1)  to treat (a patient or illness or material)
 * 2)  to treat, to deal with, to have to do with, to process, to handle (a subject)
 * 3)  to prevail upon, to persuade, to win over
 * 4)  to practise
 * 1)  to practise

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to treat (a patient or illness)
 * 2) to address or deal with (an issue)

title: عالج


text:
Rhymes:Luxembourgish/ut

One syllable

 * Blutt
 * Gutt
 * gutt
 * Hutt
 * Mutt
 * Rutt
 * Schutt
 * Sputt

title: Rhymes:Luxembourgish/ut


text: dewdhorn

title: dewdhorn


text:
لاحق

Etymology 1
Morphologically from the root.

Verb

 * 1) to

Etymology 2
of.

Adjective

 * 1) following,

Etymology 1
From.

Verb

 * 1) to, to follow

Etymology 2
From.

Adjective

 * 1) following,
 * 1) following,

Etymology
From.

Verb

 * 1) to follow, to pursue, to chase

title: لاحق


text:
Gutt

Etymology
From, from. Cognate with 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) goods, possessions, property, estate

title: Gutt


text: vassfargen

title: vassfargen


text:
слушател

Etymology
From, from.

Noun

 * 1) listener

title: слушател


text:
Sputt

Noun

 * 1) space, gap
 * 2) leeway, elbow room

title: Sputt


text: gosow

title: gosow


text: -тел

title: -тел


text: ortopezi

title: ortopezi


text: vassfargar

title: vassfargar


text:
ortopedă

Etymology
From.

title: ortopedă


text: vassfargane

title: vassfargane


text: ortopede

title: ortopede


text:
Mous

Etymology
From, from , from. Cognate with 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) purée, mush

title: Mous


text: Category:Macedonian terms suffixed with -тел


text: vassfarga

title: vassfarga


text: vassfarger

title: vassfarger


text:
ortopedist

Etymology
,.

Noun

 * 1)  orthopedist

title: ortopedist


text: ortopediști

title: ortopediști


text:
ortopedistă

Etymology
From.

title: ortopedistă


text: ortopediste

title: ortopediste


text:
бродоградител

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) shipbuilder

title: бродоградител


text: shùnhuā

title: shùnhuā


text:
вероучител

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) preacher
 * 2) catechist

title: вероучител


text: 麪包皮

title: 麪包皮


text:
dewfrik

Noun

 * 1) nose
 * 1) nose

title: dewfrik


text:
frigow

Noun

 * 1) nose
 * 1) nose

title: frigow


text:
војсководител

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) military leader, general

title: војсководител


text:
говорител

Noun

 * 1) speaker

Etymology
From, from.

Noun

 * 1) speaker

title: говорител


text:
gweus

Etymology
From (compare 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬), compound of  and  (compare 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬), from  (compare 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬).

Noun

 * 1) lip

title: gweus


text:
araa

Noun

 * 1) water

title: araa


text: diwweus

title: diwweus


text: akınları

title: akınları


text: gweusyow

title: gweusyow


text: akınlara

title: akınlara


text: akınlarda

title: akınlarda


text: akınlardan

title: akınlardan


text: akınların

title: akınların


text: akına

title: akına


text: akında

title: akında


text: akından

title: akından


text: bohow

title: bohow


text: diwvogh

title: diwvogh


text:
vass-

Etymology
From, genitive form of.

Prefix

 * 1) water, used as the first part of compound words.

title: vass-


text:
bogh

Etymology
From, borrowed through from. Cognate with 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

title: bogh


text:
skoodh

Etymology
From, from , from , cognate with 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, and 🇨🇬).

title: skoodh


text: diwskodh

title: diwskodh


text: skodhow

title: skodhow


text: kaselyow

title: kaselyow


text: diwgasel

title: diwgasel


text: kasel

title: kasel


text: Category:zh:Winter sports

title: Category:zh:Winter sports


text: Category:zh:Winter activities

title: Category:zh:Winter activities


text:
cesail

Noun

 * 1)  armpit
 * 2)  axil

title: cesail


text: ysgwyddau

title: ysgwyddau


text: ceseiliau

title: ceseiliau


text: Esperantise

title: Esperantise


text: īnanga

title: īnanga


text: īnaka

title: īnaka


text:
āhuruhuru

Noun

 * 1) goatfish

title: āhuruhuru


text: 小檗碱

title: 小檗碱


text:
Module talk:zh/data/dial-syn/麵包

, curious as to source for using 胖 for bread. Hongthay (talk) 19:39, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
 * It's from 客語認證詞彙資料庫. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 19:42, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Hongthay (talk) 00:41, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

title: Module talk:zh/data/dial-syn/麵包


text:
ונוס

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) Venus: the Roman goddess of love and beauty.
 * 2)  Venus: the second planet in our solar system.

title: ונוס


text:
kúro

Pronoun

 * 1) some (singular).
 * 2) someone, somebody, anyone, anybody.

title: kúro


text:
naŋge

Noun

 * 1) water

Noun

 * 1) water

title: naŋge


text:
hellener

Noun

 * 1) Greek, particularly someone from Ancient Greece

title: hellener


text:
propagandakrig

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) a propaganda war

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) a propaganda war

title: propagandakrig


text:
Näid

Etymology
From, from. Cognate with 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) envy

title: Näid


text:
Talk:掃灑

Quanzhou
Just to make sure, this is used in Quanzhou, right? Min-Fang-Da doesn't have Quanzhou. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 20:18, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Yeah, the only reason I included that word is because I speak the Quanzhou variant and we often use this word. --Mar vin kaiser (talk) 10:12, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I see. Thanks! — justin(r)leung { (t...) 15:17, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:掃灑


text:
Rhymes:Luxembourgish/æːɪt

One syllable

 * Näid
 * Sträit
 * Säit
 * säit
 * wäit
 * Zäit

title: Rhymes:Luxembourgish/æːɪt


text:
committeeing

Noun

 * 1) Discussing in a committee.

title: committeeing


text: konaow

title: konaow


text:
wámbe

Noun

 * 1) water

title: wámbe


text:
konna bregh

Etymology
From +.

title: konna bregh


text: dewgonna bregh

title: dewgonna bregh


text: konaow bregh

title: konaow bregh


text: propagandakrigen

title: propagandakrigen


text: User talk:86.69.154.143

title: User talk:86.69.154.143


text:
Rhymes:Luxembourgish/əp

One syllable

 * Drëpp
 * Rëpp
 * Schëpp
 * Strëpp

title: Rhymes:Luxembourgish/əp


text: 書舖

title: 書舖


text: 鐵匠舖

title: 鐵匠舖


text:
Rhymes:Luxembourgish/æːɪɕ

One syllable

 * Däich
 * gläich
 * Läich
 * Räich
 * Schläich
 * Wäich

title: Rhymes:Luxembourgish/æːɪɕ


text: 旺舖

title: 旺舖


text: 店舖盜竊

title: 店舖盜竊


text:
Schläich

Etymology
Related to.

Noun

 * 1) slide made of ice or snow

title: Schläich


text:
Rudder

Etymology
From, from. Cognate with 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) rudder
 * 2) oar

title: Rudder


text:
ingen nyheter er gode nyheter

Proverb

 * 1) no news is good news

title: ingen nyheter er gode nyheter


text:
Saaft

Etymology
From, from.

Noun

 * 1) juice

title: Saaft


text:
ʔaŋ¹³

Noun

 * 1) water

title: ʔaŋ¹³


text:
rekkje

Etymology
From the verb.

Noun

 * 1) a row, line
 * 2) a series
 * 3) a number (of)

title: rekkje


text:
Schouss

Etymology
From, from , from. Cognate with 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) lap (upper legs)

title: Schouss


text: rekkjer

title: rekkjer


text: déjà vues

title: déjà vues


text:
m³³

Noun

 * 1)  water

Synonyms

 * ʔuŋ⁵⁵

title: m³³


text: rekkjene

title: rekkjene


text: Category:Czech terms prefixed with osteo-


text:
Actias luna

Hypernyms

 * - order; - suborder;  - infraorder;  - superfamily;  - family;  - subfamily;  - tribe;  - genus

Translations

 * Chinese:
 * Mandarin: 月形天蠶蛾
 * Hungarian: holdasszövő lepke

title: Actias luna


text:
Actias

Hypernyms

 * ; - subfamily;  - tribe

Hyponyms

 * - type species; for other species see

title: Actias


text:
големец

Etymology
From, from.

Noun

 * 1) grandee, notable man

title: големец


text: SIC

title: SIC


text:
богољубец

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  pious man

title: богољубец


text:
белоглавец

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) white-headed being
 * 2)  old man

title: белоглавец


text:
белогазец

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  a person with pale buttocks

title: белогазец


text:
Template:Lepidoptera Hypernyms

 * – subphylum; – class;  – subclass;  – infraclass;  – order

title: Template:Lepidoptera Hypernyms


text:
Template:Lepidoptera Hypernyms/documentation

This is a typing shortcut intended for use under the Hypernyms header of taxa under order Lepidoptera. It can also be used with subst:.


text: Category:fo:Skeleton

title: Category:fo:Skeleton


text: U.S.S.

title: U.S.S.


text:
гомнојадец

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  shiteater, bullshitter, imbecile

title: гомнојадец


text:
дебелогазец

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  fat-ass

title: дебелогазец


text:
дрвокрадец

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) tree poacher

title: дрвокрадец


text:
еднобожец

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) monotheist

title: еднобожец


text:
знаменосец

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) standard-bearer

Etymology
From by haplology.

Noun

 * 1) standard-bearer, banner-bearer, gonfalonier

title: знаменосец


text: みみこ

title: みみこ


text: Mimiko

title: Mimiko


text: booster clubs

title: booster clubs


text: みう

title: みう


text: Miu

title: Miu


text:
panpsychizmus

Noun

 * 1) panpsychism

title: panpsychizmus


text:
meetsysteem

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) measurement system

title: meetsysteem


text:
maandnaam

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) month name

title: maandnaam


text: ゆいこ

title: ゆいこ


text:
Yuiko

Etymology
Borrowed from.

Etymology
Borrowed from.

title: Yuiko


text:
droomoord

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) place of dreams, very idyllic location

title: droomoord


text: もえこ

title: もえこ


text: Moeko

title: Moeko


text: みさこ

title: みさこ


text:
Misako

Etymology
Borrowed from.

Etymology
.

title: Misako


text:
Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2016-08/User:OctraBot for bot status

User:OctraBot for bot status

 * Nomination: I hereby request the Bot flag for User:OctraBot for the following purposes:
 * Interwiki cleanup using pywikibot. It has been run on many Wiktionaries for some time.
 * Content cleanup implementing Wiki.java. This task is generic purpose; it will be manually run in required situation such as template replacement, format cleanup. It has ever been run on Thai Wikipedia, Thai Wiktionary and few other projects. Some tasks in this scope may need to vote in the future.
 * Octahedron80 (talk) 00:44, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

 * Vote starts: 00:44, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Vote ends: 23:59, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

 * Discussion:
 * User talk:Octahedron80

Support

 * 1)  --Daniel Carrero (talk) 05:46, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I said Octahedron80 could use OctraBot to do a very small test run if the owner wanted. Apparently the test run is going well. Hence support. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 05:46, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * The bot was blocked a few days ago because the owner did 60+ test edits before the bot was approved. The number of edits may be a little high, but the edits seem otherwise OK with me. In my opinion, the bot can be unblocked without prejudice if this vote passes. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 09:56, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
 * WT:BOT says to do "10-50" test edits, so 60+ does not sound too excessive. --WikiTiki89 11:43, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
 * 1)  -Xbony2 (talk) 20:39, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * 2)  Wyang (talk) 10:48, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
 * 3)  --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 12:49, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
 * 4)  —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 14:34, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Abstain

 * 1)  Andrew Sheedy (talk) 22:56, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Decision
Passed. 5-1-0 (100%-0%) --Daniel Carrero (talk) 00:05, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
 * I unblocked the bot without prejudice.
 * , someone please flip the bit for.
 * , the bot user page is empty. It would be nice if it had a short description of the bot work. Thank you. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 00:05, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Actually, I made a mistake and closed the vote early. (It was scheduled to end today at 23:59) But the vote would pass equally well tomorrow, so I won't bother to undo my edit. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 00:18, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Done. —Stephen (Talk) 01:40, 9 September 2016 (UTC)


text:
sordiino

Etymology
<

Noun

 * 1)  mute, sordine device for dulling the sound of an instrument
 * 2)  sordiino päällä : unable or unwilling to speak, quiet, uninformative, keeping a low profile

title: sordiino


text: career fairs

title: career fairs


text: career expos

title: career expos


text: Category:Sicilian terms borrowed from Norman


text: Category:duo:Anatomy

title: Category:duo:Anatomy


text: Category:Kohistani Shina entry maintenance


text: Category:Dumi borrowed terms

title: Category:Dumi borrowed terms


text: Category:duo:Family

title: Category:duo:Family


text: Category:Dupaningan Agta terms prefixed with ma-


text: Category:Huehuetla Tepehua lemmas

title: Category:Huehuetla Tepehua lemmas


text: Category:Huarpean languages

title: Category:Huarpean languages


text: Category:Sicilian terms borrowed from Occitan


text: Category:Miji nouns

title: Category:Miji nouns


text: Category:Miji lemmas

title: Category:Miji lemmas


text: Category:Sicilian terms borrowed from French


text: Category:Cornish terms prefixed with diw-


text: Category:Shastan languages

title: Category:Shastan languages


text: Category:Merei nouns

title: Category:Merei nouns


text: Category:duo:Weapons

title: Category:duo:Weapons


text: Category:Old Spanish borrowed terms

title: Category:Old Spanish borrowed terms


text: Category:Irish terms prefixed with acanta-


text: Category:Merei lemmas

title: Category:Merei lemmas


text: Category:Taraon nouns

title: Category:Taraon nouns


text: Category:Bukawa nouns

title: Category:Bukawa nouns


text: Category:Taraon lemmas

title: Category:Taraon lemmas


text: Category:Bukawa lemmas

title: Category:Bukawa lemmas


text: Category:duo:Birds

title: Category:duo:Birds


text: Category:Atong (India) terms derived from Indo-European languages


text: Category:kls:Sciences

title: Category:kls:Sciences


text: Category:Huehuetla Tepehua nouns

title: Category:Huehuetla Tepehua nouns


text: Category:duo:Annelids

title: Category:duo:Annelids


text: Category:Sissano language

title: Category:Sissano language


text: Category:Yakan proper nouns

title: Category:Yakan proper nouns


text: Category:Kaiep language

title: Category:Kaiep language


text: Category:Gallurese terms inherited from Latin


text: Category:Waikuri language

title: Category:Waikuri language


text: Category:Eastern Lawa nouns

title: Category:Eastern Lawa nouns


text: Category:Dumi terms derived from Nepali

title: Category:Dumi terms derived from Nepali


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Philistine

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Philistine


text: Category:Bokar nouns

title: Category:Bokar nouns


text: Category:Highland Oaxaca Chontal language


text: Category:Malalí language

title: Category:Malalí language


text: Category:duo:Animals

title: Category:duo:Animals


text: Category:Sio language

title: Category:Sio language


text: Category:Yabula Yabula language

title: Category:Yabula Yabula language


text: Category:Kis language

title: Category:Kis language


text: Category:Gallurese terms inherited from Late Latin


text: Category:Wab language

title: Category:Wab language


text: Category:Eastern Lawa lemmas

title: Category:Eastern Lawa lemmas


text: Category:Dumi terms derived from Maithili


text: Category:kls:All topics

title: Category:kls:All topics


text: Category:Ikizu nouns

title: Category:Ikizu nouns


text: Category:Na nouns

title: Category:Na nouns


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Nepali

title: Category:Terms borrowed from Nepali


text: Category:Chichewa non-lemma forms

title: Category:Chichewa non-lemma forms


text: Category:Hruso nouns

title: Category:Hruso nouns


text: Category:Milang nouns

title: Category:Milang nouns


text: Category:Bokar lemmas

title: Category:Bokar lemmas


text: Category:Kiowa entry maintenance

title: Category:Kiowa entry maintenance


text: Category:Jeikó language

title: Category:Jeikó language


text: Category:Gagadu language

title: Category:Gagadu language


text: Category:rmq:Religion

title: Category:rmq:Religion


text: Category:mn:Formal sciences

title: Category:mn:Formal sciences


text: Category:Dumi terms derived from Bhojpuri


text: Category:Ikizu lemmas

title: Category:Ikizu lemmas


text: Category:Na lemmas

title: Category:Na lemmas


text: Category:Terms borrowed from Middle Chinese


text: Category:Hruso lemmas

title: Category:Hruso lemmas


text: Category:Milang lemmas

title: Category:Milang lemmas


text: Category:Xerénte language

title: Category:Xerénte language


text: Category:Fur language

title: Category:Fur language


text: Category:English terms derived from Taraon


text: Category:mn:Computing

title: Category:mn:Computing


text: Category:Dumi entry maintenance

title: Category:Dumi entry maintenance


text: Category:Czech terms borrowed from Norwegian