text:
User talk:The lorax

Reference errors on 28 March
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
 * On the Lena Dunham page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=653957708 your edit] caused an archiveurl error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F653957708%7CLena Dunham%5D%5D Ask for help])

April 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Jon Ronson, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Shibboleth ink (♔ ♕) 23:41, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

 * Wet Hot American Summer
 * added links pointing to Foreigner, Beth, Day By Day and Turn Me Loose

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 15 August
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
 * On the The Awl page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=676257235 your edit] caused an archiveurl error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F676257235%7CThe Awl%5D%5D Ask for help])

Disambiguation link notification for August 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ben Rose House, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Hughes. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:50, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Berman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carlisle. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

A page you started (Dylan Byers) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Dylan Byers, The lorax!

Wikipedia editor LavaBaron just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"good job, surprised he didn't have a BLP before now"

To reply, leave a comment on LavaBaron's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bernie-sanders-university-of-chicago-1962.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Bernie-sanders-university-of-chicago-1962.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:24, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Bernie-sanders-university-of-chicago-1962.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Bernie-sanders-university-of-chicago-1962.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. czar 10:57, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jenna Wortham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Morning News. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Cigarette Tax Per State.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cigarette Tax Per State.png, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 08:18, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Gawker.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Gawker.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:49, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lauren Duca
Hello The lorax,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Lauren Duca for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Natureium (talk) 04:43, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

A page you started (Open Casket) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Open Casket, The lorax!

Wikipedia editor Mduvekot just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Thanks!"

To reply, leave a comment on Mduvekot's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Mduvekot (talk) 20:28, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bill Nye, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Fast Company and John Keister. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Bill Nye and Jacqueline Jenkins-Nye.jpeg

A tag has been placed on File:Bill Nye and Jacqueline Jenkins-Nye.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the Non-free fair use tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. This does not fall under wp:fair use - please read. Jim1138 (talk) 20:01, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bill Nye the Science Guy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Keister. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cruiseonoprah.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Cruiseonoprah.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:NYT-screenshot.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:NYT-screenshot.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:08, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Affleck-burton-incident.png
Thanks for uploading File:Affleck-burton-incident.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:32, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Affleck-burton-incident.png
Thanks for uploading File:Affleck-burton-incident.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:05, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bill Nye Speed Walker Almost Live 1990.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Bill Nye Speed Walker Almost Live 1990.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:17, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bill Nye
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bill Nye you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 11:20, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Where to put Bill Nye
I put him in "Chemists and materials scientists" for lack of anything better in the sciences section, but he might be better placed in a media category. How about "Actors, directors, models, performers, and celebrities" in Media and drama? Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 14:56, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
 * , seems fair to say with the many television programs he's hosted that he can also be considered a television performer.--The lorax (talk) 15:11, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Done. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 15:27, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bill Nye
The article Bill Nye you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Bill Nye for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 15:01, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Twitter suspensions, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Hogg ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Twitter_suspensions check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Twitter_suspensions?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Meet me an Emma Gonzalez’s Talk
We can discuss your revisions there once I set up a discussion. TheTBirdusThoracis (talk) 18:18, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Kirkcameroncrocoduck.JPG
Thank you for uploading File:Kirkcameroncrocoduck.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION : This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Get Out
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Get Out you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Lord David, Duke of Glencoe (talk) 11:10, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 3
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Careless Whisper, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBS Records ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Careless_Whisper check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Careless_Whisper?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Majora Carter Photo
the photo up now is 9 years old. There was a current photo up, which was changed to the 9 year old photo....why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.192.161.242 (talk) 16:15, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

The Hills Have Eyes
I can see that you are very interested in films and I was wondering if you would like to review an article I nominated for GA: Wes Craven's The Hills Have Eyes. Thanks for your consideration!MagicatthemovieS (talk) 17:09, 5 October 2018 (UTC)MagicatthemovieS
 * Sure thing! 'Tis the season for horror movies!--The lorax (talk) 01:52, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Whoops, looks like is doing it!--The lorax (talk) 01:54, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
 * , If you want to do it, you are welcome to take over; I have not started the review yet and you probably know lot more about the subject of the article than I do. --Katolophyromai (talk) 02:07, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
 * have you seen the above request?MagicatthemovieS (talk) 02:56, 8 October 2018 (UTC)MagicatthemovieS

Dropping a note about my redirect
Hey, wanted to reach out and drop a note about this redirect. Initially the entry made sense to me given recent developments, but as I looked for more sources to flesh out beyond this one aspect, I really couldn't find any, even as to basic biographical sketch, and so with my NPR hat on, I think it doesn't meet the fundamental goals of WP:WHYN and poses the common risks of WP:PSEUDO. I've redirected for now, while realizing reasonable people's opinions may vary here and I may be reverted. If no, I may put it up as a redirect for deletion (since I do think it should either be a real bio or probably left out altogether) but I'll give it a bit of time to see; in the short-term I just didn't want to leave it open to inviting the coatracking, etc., issues of PSEUDO in absence of a broader range of sources from which to develop a more substantive biography. Hope that all makes sense, please feel free to ping me if you have any questions for my end. Innisfree987 (talk) 06:25, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Helen Hays (ornithologist)) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Helen Hays (ornithologist), The lorax!

Wikipedia editor Innisfree987 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Great find! Thanks!"

To reply, leave a comment on Innisfree987's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Innisfree987 (talk) 06:46, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Hills & Eyes
FunkMonk is OK with the article for The Hills Have Eyes; you just need to pass itMagicatthemovieS (talk) 21:35, 15 October 2018 (UTC)MagicatthemovieS
 * Ah gotcha, will take a look.--The lorax (talk) 23:10, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Charlie Work.png
Thank you for uploading File:Charlie Work.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:14, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Born Villain
We worked well together on a horror related article, and I just nominated a new horror film for GA: Born Villain, a film starring and co-written by Marilyn Manson. It's a VERY short article, and I would be so grateful if you reviewed it.MagicatthemovieS (talk) 18:04, 22 October 2018 (UTC)MagicatthemovieS
 * I'll try to jump on it this week! --The lorax (talk) 17:54, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Someone is already reviewing it. That's OK, we can collaborate another time.MagicatthemovieS (talk) 17:59, 24 October 2018 (UTC)MagicatthemovieS

Your GA nomination of Fred Rogers
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Fred Rogers you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Figureskatingfan -- Figureskatingfan (talk) 18:01, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Dr. Horatio Q. Birdbath
Hello! Your submission of Dr. Horatio Q. Birdbath at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:00, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

Talkback
Please respond by the end of the month, otherwise I will close the nomination as unsuccessful. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 14:56, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Girl wash your face book cover.jpg
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:03, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Girl, Wash Your Face) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Girl, Wash Your Face.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process.

Thanks for your new article on the book "Girl, Wash Your Face".

To reply, leave a comment here and ping me.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk|Contribs) 23:32, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Helen Hays
Alex Shih (talk) 12:01, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

Get Out
I see it has been languishing in GAN since August, with no progress. You may want to request another person to review it. -- Kailash29792 (talk)  06:56, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Purv Pullen
— Maile (talk) 00:03, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Fred Rogers
The article Fred Rogers you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Fred Rogers for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Figureskatingfan -- Figureskatingfan (talk) 00:02, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Flat fix website screenshot.png
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:02, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Flat fix website screenshot.png
Thanks for uploading File:Flat fix website screenshot.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text  below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 05:15, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Flat fix website screenshot.png
Thanks for uploading File:Flat fix website screenshot.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Sniz and fondue title card.png
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:01, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Portlandia title card.png
Thanks for uploading File:Portlandia title card.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:51, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Get Out
The article Get Out you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Get Out for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DJ-Joker16 -- DJ-Joker16 (talk) 22:01, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bramble Cay melomys
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bramble Cay melomys you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 11:40, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bramble Cay melomys
The article Bramble Cay melomys you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Bramble Cay melomys for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 17:42, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Jon Stewart
As far as I can tell, the only "current event" Jon Stewart is involved in is criticizing members of a Congressional committee. This is not a developing, we-don't-know-the-facts-yet situation that requires a disclaimer. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 18:30, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Bramble cay melomys
I left you a ping here, and a message here. You have edited since those messages, but have chosen to ignore them. Why is this? Vanamonde (Talk) 21:47, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
 * — hi there, no disrespect intended and I didn't mean to leave you hanging, I was not familiar with the guidelines to ping everyone who had contributed significantly to articles when nominating articles for Good article status or Did You Know? I appreciate all the hard work you did on making that article great. Is there anything more we need to do for the Did You Know nomination? The lorax (talk) 23:29, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
 * It isn't a formal guideline; it's more basic than that. If you're doing anything substantial with an article, it's best practice to discuss it with major contributors beforehand. If you're nominating the article for DYK (or GAN, or FAC), and you are not the major contributor in terms of text, it is conventional to add the major contributors as conominators. This is what I would suggest you do at the DYK nomination. Otherwise, you simply need to wait for a review. Vanamonde (Talk) 23:36, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
 * I will definitely make sure to do that in the future. The lorax (talk) 00:11, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Okay then. Happy editing. Vanamonde (Talk) 00:26, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Howard Dean into Howard Dean 2004 presidential campaign. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 18:10, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ferris Bueller's Day Off, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gone with the Wind ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Ferris_Bueller%27s_Day_Off check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Ferris_Bueller%27s_Day_Off?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:11, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Bramble Cay melomys
valereee (talk) 00:02, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of Earther dot com.png
Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Earther dot com.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:41, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Earther for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Earther is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Earther until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) (talk) 18:44, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Earther for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Earther is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Earther& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) (talk) 20:17, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Milli Vanilli, Girl You Know Its True album, liner notes.gif
Thank you for uploading File:Milli Vanilli, Girl You Know Its True album, liner notes.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Death of George Floyd intersection locations
Hi, lorax! Thanks for adding the picture of the intersection to Death of George Floyd. I don't think that pin #1 shows the location of the "arrest and death", though. The arrest happened in front of the Dragon Wok across the street, which isn't shown in that picture but would be off to the lower-right. Pin #1 shows the location of the police car that they put him in, before they took him out and pinned him on the ground. I'm not sure the sources have identified an exact location of the death. He was pronounced dead at the hospital, and was reported to have entered cardiac arrest in the ambulance, but had no pulse at the scene. So I'm not sure at what point in the sequence of events he died, exactly, but I'm not sure if any RSes say he died at the scene (as opposed to dying in the ambulance or at the hospital). The New York Times video has a diagram at 2:57 that shows the intersection and the location of his arrest and where he was pinned to the ground. What do you think, should the pin location or description be changed? Maybe something like, "Location where Chauvin placed his knee on Floyd's neck"? Cheers, Levivich [dubious – discuss] 01:59, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi, I think you're right. I was trying to add a photo to contextualize the scene better. I'll tweak the pins to better match what we know.The lorax (talk) 02:18, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Awesome, thanks! I think the photo is a great idea. Levivich [dubious – discuss] 02:50, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to Killing of George Floyd does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! Love of Corey (talk) 01:05, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi, I made a super small edit, someone broke the image on the page. I'll make sure to explain edits in the future. The lorax (talk) 01:07, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Okay, thank you. Love of Corey (talk) 01:08, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Taylor Lorenz moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Taylor Lorenz, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Note that all articles about living people must conform to strict guidelines, as outlined at WP:BLP.  Puzzledvegetable Is it teatime already?  15:46, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Legally Blonde
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Legally Blonde you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rusted AutoParts -- Rusted AutoParts (talk) 04:01, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Legally Blonde
The article Legally Blonde you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Legally Blonde for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rusted AutoParts -- Rusted AutoParts (talk) 05:02, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Copyright problem on The Nightman Cometh
Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from https://www.gq.com/story/the-nightman-cometh-oral-history, which is not released under a compatible license. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, some content had to be removed and I paraphrased some. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa (talk) 13:36, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bernie-sanders-university-of-chicago-1962.png
Thanks for uploading File:Bernie-sanders-university-of-chicago-1962.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:10, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Wanda Kagan
You discussed Wanda Kagan, on Talk:Kamala Harris/Archive 1, on July 1st. So you might be interested in this edit.

Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 22:41, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Axel F - Harold Faltermeyer.ogg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Axel F - Harold Faltermeyer.ogg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Aaron Maté for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aaron Maté is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Aaron Maté until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. nearlyevil 665  18:35, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Dodo Logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The Dodo Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:39, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Palmer Report
Protecting this page is a vandalization Wikipedia. The content is inaccurate and politically slanted. It discredits Wikipedia and whomever created, edited and protected this page. Tbliss558 (talk) 21:26, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Suny-logo-trans.png
Thanks for uploading File:Suny-logo-trans.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Dodo Logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The Dodo Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 21:36, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Wrap logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:The Wrap logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 21:55, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Cronkitejfkdeath.gif
Thank you for uploading File:Cronkitejfkdeath.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Wrap logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:The Wrap logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:41, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Trippin'

The article Trippin' has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: "Non-notable show"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:05, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Twitter first tweet time
Hi Lorax, I changed your edit in the Twitter article, regarding the time of the first tweet. I think you got confused by the localization of timestamps shown in tweets. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Twitter#History:_time_of_first_tweet Aloist (talk) 12:51, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Trippin' for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Trippin' is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Trippin' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 00:39, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, The lorax

Thank you for creating Imagine (Gal Gadot video).

User:Pyrrho the Skipper, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Pyrrho the Skipper (talk) 17:49, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

"Monster Thickburger" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Monster Thickburger and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 24 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 16:11, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

"Monster Thickburger" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Monster Thickburger and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 22 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. FAdesdae378 (talk · contribs) 18:29, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 4
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Turkeys Away, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WQXI.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Heinz Kiessling for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Heinz Kiessling, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Heinz Kiessling until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Chickenorfish.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Chickenorfish.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Spearssculpture.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Spearssculpture.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file from a commercial source (e.g. Associated Press, Getty Images), where the file itself is not the subject of sourced commentary. If you can explain why the file can be used under the non-free content guidelines, please add the appropriate non-free use tag and rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. jlwoodwa (talk) 10:39, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Dodo Logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The Dodo Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of Earther dot com.png
Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Earther dot com.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

File:Virtualinsanityvideo.JPG listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Virtualinsanityvideo.JPG, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. George Ho (talk) 01:15, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Get Ready For This - 2 Unlimited.ogg

The file File:Get Ready For This - 2 Unlimited.ogg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: "Content heard in sample not improvement to understanding the whole song recording. Not proof that free text is inadequate to educate readers well about the topic in question. In other words, not contextually significant."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. George Ho (talk) 02:09, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

File:Get Ready For This - 2 Unlimited.ogg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Get Ready For This - 2 Unlimited.ogg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. George Ho (talk) 05:24, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Terror Train
Would you like to review Terror Train for GA?MagicatthemovieS (talk) 04:49, 30 April 2024 (UTC)MagicatthemovieS

title: User talk:The lorax


text:
Talk:Argo

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 29 March 2021 and 11 June 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): MagpieMeadows. Peer reviewers: Annika.Nicholas, Sailing to Byzantium 2021.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 14:41, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Landing page for 'Argo'
Most certainty people are looking for the Argo (2012 film) and not this start-class article. If no objections, I think the default for 'Argo' should be the Best Picture Film, Argo (on english wikipedia).

--Opertinicy (talk) 02:32, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

On the meaning of Argo
The article previously stated that the meaning of the word Argo was "swift". This seems very wrong to me. In modern Greek, Argos is "slow", and according to the ancient dictionaries I have, the older word was actually derived from "Silver". I have removed the possibly erroneous definition, awaiting discussion or sources. ResultingConstant (talk) 20:23, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

What about the figurehead?
In the movie Jason and the Argonauts (1963 film), the Argo is shown with an immense figurehead with the shape of Hera, and located not in the prow, but in the stern of the boat. Is this an invention of the movie, or was this described like so in the Argonautica or somewhere else?

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Talk:Argo


text:
Shimōsa Province

Shimōsa Province (下総国) was a province of Japan in the area of modern Chiba Prefecture and Ibaraki Prefecture as well as the bordering parts of Saitama Prefecture and Tokyo (the parts that used to be located east of the lower reaches of the old Tone River prior to the river's eastward diversion, i.e. the parts of the former Katsushika District of Shimōsa that have been transferred to North Katsushika District of Saitama Prefecture and Sumida, Kōtō, Edogawa, and Katsushika wards of Tokyo). It lies to the north of the Bōsō Peninsula (房総半島), whose name takes its first kanji from the name of Awa Province and its second from Kazusa and Shimōsa Provinces. Its abbreviated form name was Sōshū (総州) or Hokusō (北総).

Shimōsa is classified as one of the provinces of the Tōkaidō. It was bordered by Kazusa Province to the south, Musashi and Kōzuke Provinces to the west, and Hitachi and Shimotsuke Provinces to the north. Under the Engishiki classification system, Shimōsa was ranked as a "great country" (大国) and a far country (遠国).

History
Shimōsa was originally part of a larger territory known as Fusa Province (総国, occasionally 捄国), which was divided into "upper" and "lower" portions (i.e. Kazusa and Shimōsa) during the reign of Emperor Kōtoku (645–654). It was well-known to the Imperial Court in Nara period Japan for its fertile lands, and is mentioned in Nara period records as having supplied hemp to the Court. Shimōsa was divided into 11 (later 12) counties. The exact location of the capital of Shimōsa is not precisely known, but is believed to have been somewhere within the borders of the modern city of Ichikawa, Chiba, near Kōnodai Station where the ruins of the Kokubun-ji have been located. However, the Ichinomiya of Shimōsa Province is the Katori Jingū in what is now the city of Katori, Chiba, on the opposite coast of the province.

During the Heian period, the province was divided into numerous shōen controlled by local samurai clans, primarily the Chiba clan, which sided with Minamoto no Yoritomo in the Genpei War. During the Kamakura period, much of the province was under the control of the Chiba clan. By the early Muromachi period, the area was a highly contested region highly fragmented by various samurai clans. By the Sengoku period, the Later Hōjō clan held sway following the Battle of Kōnodai (1538) against the Ashikaga clan and the Satomi clan.

Following the installation of Tokugawa Ieyasu in Edo, after the Battle of Odawara, he created eleven han within the borders of Shimōsa to reward his followers, with the remaining area retained as tenryō territory owned directly by the shōgun and administered by various hatamoto. The entire province had an assessed revenue of 681,062 koku. Following the Meiji Restoration, these various domains and tenryō territories were transformed into short-lived prefectures in July 1871 by the abolition of the han system. Most of Shimōsa Province became part of the new Chiba Prefecture on June 15, 1873, with four districts (Yūki, Toyoda, Sashima, Okada) going to the new Ibaraki Prefecture and the portion to the west of the Edogawa River going to the new Saitama Prefecture.

Historical districts
The area of former Shimōsa Province was organized into twelve districts by the Meiji cadastral reforms: Chiba, Inba, Katori, Kaijō, Shimohabu. Sōsa, Okada, Sashima, Toyoda, Yūki, Sōma and Katsushika.
 * Chiba Prefecture
 * Chiba District (ja:千葉郡) – dissolved
 * Inba District (ja:印旛郡) – absorbed Shimohabu District on April 1, 1897
 * Katori District (ja:香取郡)
 * Kaijō District (ja:海上郡) – dissolved
 * Shimohabu District (ja:下埴生郡) – merged into Inba District on April 1, 1897
 * Sōsa District (ja:匝瑳郡) – dissolved
 * Ibaraki Prefecture
 * Okada District (ja:岡田郡) – merged into Yūki District on March 29, 1896
 * Sashima District (ja:猿島郡) – absorbed Nishikatsushika District on March 29, 1896
 * Toyoda District (ja:豊田郡 (下総国)) – merged into Yūki District on March 29, 1896
 * Yūki District (ja:結城郡) – absorbed Okada and Toyoda Districts on March 29, 1896
 * Mixed
 * Sōma District (ja:相馬郡 (下総国)) – dissolved
 * Kitasōma District (ja:北相馬郡) (Ibaraki)
 * Minamisōma District (ja:南相馬郡) (Chiba) – merged into Higashikatsushika District on April 1, 1897
 * Katsushika District (ja:葛飾郡) – dissolved
 * Higashikatsushika District (ja:東葛飾郡) (Chiba) – absorbed Minamisōma District on April 1, 1897; – now dissolved
 * Nakakatsushika District (ja:中葛飾郡) (Saitama) – merged into Kitakatsushika District (Musashi, Saitama) on March 29, 1896
 * Nishikatsushika District (ja:西葛飾郡) (Ibaraki) – merged into Sashima District on March 29, 1896
 * Minamikatsushika District (ja:南葛飾郡) (Tokyo)

title: Shimōsa Province


text:
Liberalism and conservatism in Latin America

Liberalism and conservatism in Latin America have unique historical roots as Latin American independence began to occur in 1808 after the French Revolution and the subsequent Napoleonic Wars that eventually engulfed all of Europe. French revolutionaries in the 1790s began an intellectual awakening called the Enlightenment, which opened the door for ideas of positivism in Latin American society and people in Latin America turned to liberal ideologies as liberalism means the idea of liberty, equality and popular sovereignty.

During the early 19th century in Latin America, liberalism clashed with conservative views as liberals wanted to end the dominance of the Catholic Church, class stratification and slavery. These issues for many years strongly affected the way that Latin American society was organized. The majority of liberals believed in a democratic system of government, but this system would create many changes and much confusion in Latin American communities in the early 19th century. On the other hand, conservatism favored existing systems and hierarchies. Conservatives believed chaos and social disorder would break out if the political system were liberalized. Latin American conservatives generally believed in class stratification and opposed radical change in government in Latin America.

The contest between liberals and conservatives in Latin America, while sweeping in effect, was largely fought between members of the landed, white or creole elite. Creoles were the children of immigrated European families. Systems in place from the colonial period—such as slavery, patronage by the elite and debt peonage—meant that the great mass of Indians, Africans and people of mixed race had little, if any power compared to the very small creole ruling class. Thus the concern that liberalization would lead to "disorder" that the conservatives spoke about is considered by some historians as a veiled or transparent fear of race war.

Caudillos soon came to power in some Latin American societies, such as Mexico. Caudillos were people of either progressive or conservative thought, who promised protection and restoration of traditional ways to the people. They were generally pragmatic, believing in a ruling system of what works best. Caudillos used military force to hold society together.

Since the 1980s, there have been several neo-liberal economic reforms across Latin America, in order to support expansive industrialization.