text:
Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Article content disputes archive

''If the dispute was resolved, please give a brief indication of the resolution. Please list new entries on top.''

Archived

 * Template_talk:Communism. Disagreement over the inclusion or exclusion of Anarcho-Communism.
 * Talk:Kitten arguement over whether or not a link to evil reptilian kitten-eater from another planet should be in/is relevant to the article. There have been multiple reverts/changed back and forth.
 * Talk:Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (5.101)Dispute about Wittgenstein's influence on electrical engineering.
 * Talk:List of self-proclaimed deities. Should Jesus be included in a list of 'self-proclaimed deities? If so with what comments? Apart from that, in one day four templates have variously been added to this article by one user after the article maintained a long streak of popularity and perceived neutral content by many editors. These are, , , and {{{{limitedgeographicscope}} . When one is removed, a different one is added. Playing the template game is frustrating for all users involved and it makes it very difficult to discuss any relevant issues.
 * Only template remaining is, all others have been cleared after discussions and edits were done to the article. See the talk page.

 * Talk:Fart fetishism - Post VfD debate, to keep or delete fart diary section.
 * Talk:Desperate Housewives - A section was added called "Characters and Crimes" detailing main characters and the crimes they have perpetuated. A user removed this section, stating it did not belong, after a number of other users edited/contributed to the section. The article has been reverted pending user input on the issue.
 * Talk:Kurdistan Workers Party - Seems overly biased against PKK, much stronger and more definate use of language than other "terrorist" organisation articles, seems fairly one-sided, any attempt to try and reach a consensus nearly always ends in deadlock, although some progress has been made. One user frequently reverts to his (poorer) grammar and spelling and removes POV/info.
 * Talk:Israel unilateral disengagement plan of 2004 - should an article about the Gaza pull-out plan which discuss the Israeli opposition to the plan include links to photos of the protest, incluiding photos showing who build Ileagl homes in the settlments in an attempt to house in them anti pull-out protestors - the links are being added by an anonymous user who owns the photos.
 * Talk:José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero - hopelessly POV article (against Zapatero), any attempts to change it result in personal intimidation from one user, making a collaborative editing atmosphere impossible.
 * Talk:Subhash_Chandra_Bose - debate regarding Bose's collaboration with the Axis forces, and its consequences for ordinary Indians/the Indian freedom fight against the British.
 * Talk:Economy of the United States: Currently, several articles take into account the European Union when discussing the gross domestic product and ordered ranking of national economies. It is debated whether or not the EU should be referenced in these cases.
 * Talk:George W. Bush Ongoing diagreements regarding the omission of politically charged opinion and constituting this as merely stating facts about opinions. In particular, the section regarding mental health but also the discussion regarding drug and alcohol abuse.
 * Talk:Council on American-Islamic Relations and Talk:Muslim Public Affairs Council - anonymous users repeatedly insert anti-Israel POV, attacking critics of these groups as "neo-conservative and Zionist organizations with political agendas".
 * Talk:Frank_Chu - debate about appropriateness and accuracy of the term "schizophrenia" as used here; currently two authors are at loggerheads in an edit-revert war.
 * Talk:Football Should a disambig notice linking to Nuclear Football be placed at the top of Football? One party will not argue his position but reverts whenever the disambig is placed.
 * Talk:Iglesia ni Cristo Need input into dispute between members and former member over article POV.
 * Talk:Gaza Strip. Anonymous editor wants to insert several links to his photograph pages in this and related articles.
 * Talk:Pope Benedict XVI — Debate over the use of Pope Benedict XVI's style in the introduction of the article. Issues similar to the ones occuring in Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom article.
 * Talk:Fidel Castro. Several issues all in talk. Issues are primarily with the introduction and several of the more controversial subsections of the article.
 * Talk:Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom — a minor argument about the use of titles, and a major problem of the NPoV status of the whole article
 * Talk:Jesus. Dispute over the balance of the article, which one editor claims to be PoV.
 * Talk:Israeli-Palestinian conflict -- appropriateness of the table systematizing official emblems of major Palestinian organizations. A common element (the map of Israel) on the emblems contradicts official policy of the Palestinian Authority and therefore contributes to the conflict.
 * Talk:Ahvaz - A NPOV dispute about this Iranian location's history. See also Talk:Khuzestan for a related NPOV dispute between the same users.
 * Talk:Nebula class starship - The inclusion of weapons counts for Star Trek ships is in dispute. Weapons counts are derived from studying footage from the shows and examining pictures of official models.  These counts can be open to intepretation.  It is disputed whether this may be considered original research and ineligible for inclusion.
 * Talk:Internet Explorer - Dispute over including criticism of the browser, and possible anti-MS bias.
 * Talk:Greater Serbia - A seemingly intractable dispute between two editors. Input from anyone with specialist knowledge would be helpful.
 * Talk:Cheating in Counter-Strike - The article's conclusion is that essentially, Pro gamers have to cheat to remain competitive. This is of course quite a statement, RfC'ing! The article was set on disputed (presumably till next friday) and additional input is requested, especially from more experienced wikipedians that know how to deal with such issues. (Presumably NPOV & factually correct articles that people may find offensive)
 * Talk:Orkut - Dispute over the neutrality and the factual accuracy regarding the situation of the Brazilian users in the orkut virtual community.
 * Talk:Saudi Arabia -- see section Factual corrections, the dispute is over whether institutions like the mutaween (religious police) exist in countries other than Saudi Arabia.
 * Talk:Libertarian Party (United States) -dispute over POV on "prominent libertarians".
 * Talk:Fallout (computer game) - dispute over the description of Fallout community, each of which is claimed to be POV by the author of the other.
 * Talk:Dieselboy - Two users disagreed, third opinion was sought, one user is refusing to respect the third opinion.
 * Talk:Jerome H. Lemelson - A personal threat to engage in a dispute with Wikipedia is made on the page, after added matter was removed on grounds of lack of neutrality and original research.
 * Talk:DVD — Should the topic of DVD-Audio be split into its own article?
 * Talk:Death Star - Wording describing the size of the Death Star. Which wording has less POV?
 * Talk:Jawaharlal Nehru - disputes between registered and anonymous users over whether a lengthy, unsourced section containing comparisons between Nehru and Joseph Stalin should be included.
 * Talk:Islamofascism Issues:- whether behavior of Admin:Mel Etitis in banning only one side of an RV war that Mel Etitis was involved in, is acceptable.
 * -whether behavior of Admin: jpgordon in locking a topic he was involved in to a specific edit, is acceptable.
 * -Ongoing questions on what factual information should be allowed into article following a failed VfD and repeated vandalism (wholesale content deletion).
 * It's inappropriate to refer to article editing you disagree with as "vandalism". User:Grace Note explained his edits fully on the Talk page. He removed various material that he felt was original research and not properly sourced.
 * Except that various editors with admin status have been involved in condoning abusive and vandalist edits whose POV (anti existance of Islamofascism) they agree with. Klonimus 15:09, 12 May 2005 (UTC)

 * Talk:Jesus - whether using "Before Christ" (BC) and "Anno Domini" (AD, or in the year of the Lord) or "Before Common Era" (BCE) and "Common Era" (CE) is POV -- particularly with regard to the Jesus article (Note: see Wikipedia Manual of Style)
 * Talk:Thule Society - Whether and to what extent modern conspiracy theories shall be included.
 * Talk:Palpatine - Star Wars fans: Should content from Darth Sidious be merged and redirected into this article, or the other way around.
 * Talk:Schapelle Corby — Should article include external link to http://www.schapellecorby.com.au/ her Official Support Website?
 * Talk:California State Route 17 - In article titles, is consistency (with the official name and other articles) or the "common name" more important? --SPUI (talk) 11:20, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Talk:William Pène du Bois A quoted passage from a work of fiction refers to balloons as having a "combined lifting pull of 600 pounds." In the context of this article, to assist non-U.S. readers, conversions are added in brackets. Should these conversions be given in kilograms or in newtons?
 * Talk:Suicide - Need further input about NPOV regarding suicide as a medical emergency vs. a choice.
 * Talk:Political correctness - Disagreement over fair and acurate way to describe Political correctness.
 * Talk:Christian right -- Disagreement over fair and acurate way to describe the Christian Right.
 * Talk:Appeal to belief - Editor insists that "Most scientists believe in evolution, so it must be true" is a common example of an "appeal to belief"
 * Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (biographies)/Survey on Style-Prefixed Honorary Titles - A page using an unorthodox statistical method to seek consensus about the use of "styles" in biographies (titles like "Her Majesty"). Multiple users have expressed a desire to junk the page (on grounds that the survey is confusing and the options offered vague or inappropriate) and instead use a more usual wikipedia approach to resolving the issue; others seem committed to carrying the survey though to a conclusion which will become policy.
 * Talk:May day - Dispute originally regarding a single sentence in the article has now degenerated into personal attacks and ideological sparring.
 * Talk:Vilna Gaon - whether it is appropriate to put footnotes in small print.
 * Talk:Pablo Neruda - ongoing dispute about the factual accuracy of claims made about Neruda and the NKVD/KGB
 * Talk:Timothy McVeigh — dispute over whether McVeigh is a terrorist or whether is is more NPOV to state that he was convicted of terrorism.
 * Talk:Theistic realism - How should the article be written, should extensive quotations of the inventor of the term (Philip Johnson) be used, and how should criticism be handled? Ultimately, should the article be merged or deleted?
 * Talk:Israeli settlement Dispute over how to present different views on UNSC-resolutions.
 * Talk:Homosexuality - Multiple disputes over content and NPOV
 * Talk:Joseph Smith, Jr.: should the list of wives of Joseph Smith be removed from his article.
 * Deletion policy/Masts: There is a discussion about how stub articles on radio masts (large antennas) should be handled. A merger of these stubs into a single table at List of masts is proposed.
 * Talk:Evacuation of East Prussia: Should the article begin by referring to its topic as "the Prussian Holocaust," and acting as though this is a commonly accepted term?
 * Talk:Metrication: Should the article contain a section on the ideology of metrication?
 * Talk:Interstate Highway - should km/h equivalents be to the nearest 1 or 5? --SPUI (talk) 13:48, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Talk:Chemtrail Is the article intrinsically non-neutral, unless reduced to a mere definition? Does serious discussion of the belief system amount to advocacy for the truth of the belief?
 * Talk:Technological_singularity Comments needed on whether definition should be changed. I don't want to make a significant change without a consensus as Wiki is no place for orginal researech.
 * Talk:Battlestar Galactica (disambiguation) There's a revert war going on, on whether or not the ship Battlestar Galactica deserves to be disambiguated *in any way*, to point to its article page at all.
 * Talk:Anthony Flew. Fundies and the US press have taken his conversion from atheism to deism and ran with it, meanwhile atheists are denying he even exists.  A right mess.
 * Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion - what exactly is "reposted content"?
 * Talk:Shemale and Talk:Hormone replacement therapy (trans) IP inserted highly questionable paragraphs, those were removed to the talk page and discussed. Discussion on both articles deteriorated into rabid rants and insults, with cross-references to the other debate. (Note: This RfC is more about the discussion style than particular content, so most people will be able to comment despite the rather specialised 2nd topic.)
 * Talk:Bill_Clinton. Dispute over whether pictures of bodies from the Kosovo conflict shoudl be included.
 * Talk:Jeb Bush. Dispute over NPOV, copyrighted photographs. One user is accusing others of harrassment. Other methods of dispute resolution, including requesting comment from other editors and a listing at peer review, have already been attempted. [Intemperate accusation removed by Bishonen, please see "How to use RFC" above!]
 * Ignacy Domeyko - behavior of Czalex and Rydel (dubious nationality claims), see: references

Ended in May 2005

 * talk:Guru - Problem description: revert war between two editors, mainly about the structure of the article. Should the structure of the article based on "Eastern Perspective"/"Eastern Context" and "Western Context and secular views" or on "gurus in the West and their American and "European followers" and "Assesments of guru's authenticity and criticism"? And also a dispute about one editor alleged disregard for consensus. One  editor accuses the other of advocating an anti-guru POV and in return, after this RfC was posted, the other acsuses the other to using the article to minimize the documented problems of assessing the gurus's authenticity and the documented alleged extensive criticism. Solution: no editor is happy with the current article but they can live with it. Criticism and analysis of gurus remains in the article.
 * Talk:Clay Aiken — Sentence stating There is a vocal segment of fans who speculate that Clay is gay, but he has said he is not. is being deleted out of the article repeatedly by an anon user. Article is fast approaching the 3RR for today. (Article was protected and anon user banned)

Archived

 * And twice more.
 * Talk:Perverted-Justice.com. Edit-revert war going on for months: mostly the site administrator of Perverted Justice vs. everyone else on Wikipedia.  My own personal involvement makes me a non-neutral party, therefore I am requesting assistance from more NPOV Wikipedians and administrators.
 * Talk:Allies - Should WWII Allies be divided into Major or Minor, or listed by date of entry/alphabetically? Note that current Major/Minor division seems to be a POV invented on Wikipedia.
 * Talk:Jim_Robinson — Was a recent VfD on this article conducted properly? Did the administrator who judged that VfD act properly?  An editor has now posted a request at Votes for undeletion to reconsider the VfD merge.
 * category talk:Eugenics. Is eugenics a pseudoscience?  Does evolutionary biology support eugenics?  Was Darwin a eugenicist?
 * Talk:Bisexuality Are the Kinsey statistics unacceptably inaccurate? Should they be removed from the article?
 * Talk:Lancaster (disambiguation). Dispute over whether Lancaster should link to the British city, Pennsylvania city, California city, Ohio city, or the disambiguation page.
 * Talk:Nation of Islam and anti-Semitism. This article has apparently been a chronic site of edit and revert wars. Current issues of dispute: to what extent should statements like "the NOI believes that Jews control the financial system" be presented as fact? Should extensive quotes from Khalid Abdul Muhammad be included? Are the Catholic League's charges relevant to an article on anti-Semitism?
 * Talk:Theistic realism - dispute between User:Ungtss and User:Joshuaschroeder over NPOV, attribution, and whether edits are in bad faith.
 * Talk:Journalistic standards and ethics - There is an increasingly heated debate over whether the terms "standards" and/or "ethics" should be in the title, and whether or not the article is about one, the other, or both.
 * Talk:Pederasty - Should the Budweiser ad featuring the abduction of Ganymede, from 1903, be included as an illustration?
 * Talk:Sex_in_advertising. The dispute is over the following link and description.  The ad was run was c. 1903-5. Early use of a homoerotic symbol in advertising: Budweiser beer ad based on Zeus' abduction of Ganymede
 * Talk:Battlestar Galactica (ship) – We are having a disagreement on the existence of an article on the ship Battlestar Galactica. As it is a redirect, people might not think to start an article there.
 * Talk:Harper%27s_Magazine - Does the text constitute a copyvio that requires the article to listed as such, or can a rewrite fix it, due to significant added material?
 * Talk:Centre Party (Germany) - dispute between User:John Kenney and User:Flamekeeper over Flamekeeper's additions to the article, which seem designed to provide material to support the idea of the existence of a Vatican conspiracy to bring the Nazis to power.
 * Drug abuse, Substance abuse, Harm reduction, and, bizarrely, Francis Ford Coppola. Hinges on the definition and appropriate use of the terms subtance abuse, drug abuse and drug use.
 * Poképrosal - should Pokemon stubs be merged into comprehensive lists?
 * Talk:David Dreier Dispute over one user's removal of the entire section about Campaign 2004 - i.e., the issues in the campaign of this U.S. representative and the vote total he received in the election of 2004.
 * Talk:David Bret - article primarily casting aspersions on the show business biographer, David Bret
 * Talk:Teach the Controversy A vote on merging this article with Discovery Institute.
 * Opus Dei more than 600 edits since March have turned that article into a publication of Opus Dei, or so it seems. Not even remotely NPOV any more, compare version before those IPs started to edit: . Diff from that: Various complaints on the talk page, too.
 * Talk:Russell Tribunal Should contemporary views and/or possible criticism of the Tribunal, including some from a Russian author, be permitted within the article?
 * Talk:Henry Kissinger Should the discussion of war crimes accusations be greatly condensed, and mention removed from the lead paragraph?
 * talk:Jim Ogston; it seems the chap himself has turned up, and he is not very happy (or very notable, but the vfd trolls didn't bite before...
 * Talk:Thimerosal Should the Thimerosol article contain or exclude detailed discussion of the suspected connection between autism and vaccination? There's been an edit war going on here for many days.
 * Talk: Zanskar User is making strange and sarcastic comments, and preventing me to change the article for the better with my version, which was an adaptation of the original content after I have done a massive rework (mainly cleanup and adding the Tourism section). I can't understand why they want to restrict information.
 * Talk: Bell's theorem A defender of the accepted pov is arbitrarily deleting all contributions by another member, on the grounds that she supports a minority pov. Many of her edits are, however, of a neutral character and are clearly necessary, since (among other problems) the present page presents a supposed derivation of one of the Bell inequalities that bears no relation to Bell's reasoning and is not valid.
 * Talk:Charles University of Prague How the founder of the university should be named in the article? Charles IV or Charles I?
 * Talk:Citizens Commission on Human Rights Is the fact that one website claims there is "no proof of [mental illness] actually existing" all that is needed to state this as factual?
 * Talk:Jim RobinsonDiscussion as to whether a website owner known only for his site deserves his own page, including a hardban threat if a certain person were to edit the Free Republic page after once trying to merge the two articles, allegations of unilateralism, and the lot.
 * Talk:Western betrayal. Discussion as to whether or not this title is NPOV and appropriate, as well as whether or not the article itself is inherently POV.
 * Category talk:New York state highways There seems to be some strong feeling that numbered highways must follow the three digit rule when being categorized. Thus Highway 25A must be listed under "0" as though it were really highway 025A. Categorizing the entry Highway 25A under "2" results in an immediate (or pretty fast) rv. Also, please look at Category: State highways for examples from other States, some one way and some the other. Looks like we should have (yet another) policy to avoid future conflicts.
 * Talk:Elamite_Empire ongoing edit war over alleged ethnic origins, the old persian name of elam and its modern reflex, and other sundry points. lack of sources a problem.
 * Talk:400-Series Highway woot, another edit war on whether to include miles
 * Talk:TIME: Dispute over the rendering of the magazine's name: all caps vs. standard capitalization rules. This spills over into Manual of Style (trademarks).
 * Talk:List of automotive superlatives: dispute over the inclusion of automobiles which are not type-approved as road legal, but which can be made road legal through, for example, the British Single Vehicle Approval process.
 * Talk:Yale University and Talk:Ivy League: dispute over unattributed inclusion of the phrase "one of the most prestigious universities in the world" in the Yale article and not in any of the other ivies' articles.
 * Talk:Anti-Defamation League: dispute over inclusion/exclusion of links to certain sources
 * Talk:Golliwogg: dispute about if the term is the root of the term wog. The level of offensiveness and regularity of usage of wog and golliwog has also seen debate. (Note that this summary is neither neutral nor accurate, but the editor in question keeps changing it.) Note: a dispute tag was first placed on the article on 06:39, 11 Apr 2005. The dispute tag was last removed from the article, by a different editor, on 05:45, 12 Apr 2005. The editor who placed the tag has since made five edits to the talk page since that time, including one compliment on an edit. It has not been explicitly stated that the dispute is over.
 * Talk:List of occultists: should Jesus, Solomon, and the Three Wise Men be listed as occultists? Reasons for including them have been mooted in talk; one user and a number of anons insist on reverting w/o discussion on talk.  Moreover, this request was deleted by an anon.
 * Talk:Anarchism - Calm dispute resolution (or blocking of the talk page) might be called for here. A few users are posting constant messages, one every few minutes in some cases, in what is clearly not a helpful attempt at reasoned discourse. It would seem that the situation has gotten out of hand in an article which has long been tumultuous.
 * Talk:Arabs and anti-Semitism - Seems to have quieted down, but had been a long-running dispute, for reasons including those listed by one user in discussion on talk page.
 * Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Chinese)/NPOV/China or PRC vs. mainland China: A vote on a very comprehensive change in the naming conventions of individual categories on the subject of China/mainland China. The vote has been initiated by a single user despite objections and previous discussion
 * Talk:Fatah: should the group's graphic logo be described or not. Hamas also has a history of similar text blanking under their logo.
 * Talk:Black_supremacy / Black_supremacy: Dispute over the inclusion of Black Supremacist organizations
 * Image talk:Can passport1.jpg: Who owns the copyright to a passport image?
 * Talk:Papal conclave, 2005:Should the number of countries that cardinals come from be given exactly?

 * And once more.
 * Talk:Anarchism - This page has been in a state of turmoil almost continuously since before I became a Wikipedian (which was in January of last year). It needs as much attention as it can get from disinterested Wikipedians. Current dispute centers on how best to disambiguate diffrent uses of the word "anarchism".
 * Talk:List of internet service providers who offer connection to the mbone and Talk:List of internet service providers who offer native IPv6 - These two articles were created by an anonymous IP as nearly-useless stubs, with a one-line description and a list consisting of exactly zero providers. They were signed for speedy deletion twice (by different users), and both times the creator removed the notice. Eventually they were deleted, but the creator recreated them, again as nearly-useless stubs. What should be done here?
 * Talk:Arabs and anti-Semitism - Can anything be done to improve the point-of-view of this article or its factual accuracy? It has been in dispute for more than a year!  This page has just been kept after a vfd.  Any suggestions would be most welcomed.
 * Talk:The Matrix - to resolve a dispute over deletion of content and whether it is justified, and whether participants have argued in good faith.
 * Talk:GreenFacts - to resolve a dispute between an individual and an organization, regarding an article on that organization.
 * Talk:List of academic disciplines - Is behavioral science one of the broadest categories of academic inquiry, along with natural science, social science, and humanities?
 * Talk:Origin of language - Dispute over the placing of a pseudoscientific account on the origin of language. Opinions would be appreciated. Thanks.
 * Talk:Immigration to Israel from Arab lands - Concerns for neutrality and unreferenced disputed facts. Please review, help out.
 * Talk:Golan Heights - Based on Wikipedia:Categorization rule "Unless it is self-evident and uncontroversial that something belongs in a category, it should not be put into a category.", debate over which Geography categories the Golan Heights should be placed in.
 * Talk:Bahá'u'lláh and Talk:Bahá'u'lláh's family - There is a dispute regarding the positioning of the photograph of Bahá'u'lláh. A sub-page for opinions was added at Talk:Bahá'u'lláh/Photo
 * Talk:Main page - This article is constantly undergoing massive, rapid change. Some help in settling things down would be appreciated.
 * Talk:Circumcision and Anti-semitism - As a formality, I hereby request comment on the controversial issue of the page being blanked or deleted including credible external sources and internal links to other articles.
 * Talk:Homosexuality and transgender - there is a dispute concerning the relevancy and validity of classifying intersexual people which is defined as scientific term to be transgender when gender identity refers to a socially constructed classification outside of science. See Talk:Homosexuality for the ongoing dialogue.
 * Talk:Modern geocentrism - should Modern geocentrism be placed under the category of creationism?
 * Talk:Homosexuality - there is a dispute as to whether the common definition refers to same sex or same gender; with gender having being undisputed and agreed upon for quite a while now. See Talk:Homosexuality. Similar diputes with the definition can be found on Hijra (India) and Homosexuality and transgender. To give an example - it is to as whether the defintion should include the scientific meaning of sex without the socially constructed meaning of gender as in Merriam Webster and the American Heritage Dictionary along with its implications on the article's topic.
 * Talk:Armenian Genocide - Talk:Armenian Genocide requires dispute resolution. I am having difficulty starting a discussion.
 * Talk:America's Army - Dispute about article content has resulted in heated arguments, edit wars and contested spinoff articles like America's Army controversy and America's Army Series
 * Talk:Israel Shahak Dispute about whether or not the Liberal Democrats (UK), a social liberal political party based in the United Kingdom, should be characterized a group "who condemn racism and express support for Israel".
 * Talk:Country music Dispute regarding criticism.
 * Talk:Misinformation and rumors about the September 11, 2001 attacks Dispute about how articles relating to this topic should be titled, and what their contents should be.
 * Talk:Panama Choice of map - Should professional-looking but informationally-sparse CIA maps be replaced with informationally-dense but unprofessional-looking user-made maps? (Multi-page dispute - also covers Trinidad and Tobago, Geography of Trinidad and Tobago, Argentina, Guyana, Denmark, Colombia, Namibia, Nigeria, Ecuador, Geography of Ecuador, Hungary, Dominican Republic, Haiti, Honduras, El Salvador, Guatemala, Venezuela, Bolivia, Paraguay, Zambia, etc.
 * Talk:Gene Ray and Talk:Time Cube - revert wars and NPOV problems over the question of the scientific merits of Mr. Ray's ideas, much discussion but no resolution in sight
 * Talk:mind control Dispute whether the quotes by Evangelical Christian writers Bob and Gretchen Passantino are notable enough to deserve to have a complete section to their POV or should their POV mentioned succintly that "not all counter cult activists like Bob and Gretchen Passantino believe in mind control". See also Talk:Cult
 * Talk:Mizrahi Jew One user feels recent insertions should be sourced, other feels that recent insertions need to be disproved to be removed.
 * Talk:Talk radio One user has tagged a section of the as article disputed and an NPOV "puff piece," another user doesn't see the problem.
 * Talk:Trusted computing - Should an unreferenced anti-TC opinion piece be included as the bulk of this article? Do statements like "TC has placed at risk the priceless inheritance that Gutenberg left us" belong in an encyclopedia article?
 * Talk:Canadian Alliance of Student Associations - Eternal NPOV tag
 * Talk:Canadian Federation of Students - Eternal NPOV tag
 * Talk:Common Era - whether the website religioustolerance.org is authoritative enough for the article to link to.
 * Talk:Argentina - Choice of map
 * Talk:Trinidad and Tobago - Choice of map.
 * Talk:Stepanakert. Should the title of the article about this city be Stepanakert or Khankendi?
 * Talk:List of celebrities with links to the U.S. Democratic Party. What should the format and introduction of the article be? Should people whose links to the Democrats are unexplained be removed until explanation and/or verification is given? See 2 different versions in page history, and comments on its VfD. Note both versions are works in progress.
 * Talk:The Netherlands. Is the name of the country Netherlands or The Netherlands, and should it therefore be moved to Netherlands or left at the Netherlands?
 * Talk:Ford GT90. There is a disagreement between editors about (1) whether metric units should be in the article and (2) aspects of copy.
 * Computer ethics. Two users persist in addding copyrighted material to the article, without explanation or response to a request on the Talk page for copyright permission.
 * Talk:New York City. A revert war over trimming and moving content from the article. Summary on talk page.
 * Talk:Herbert Garrison (for now) There is a debate whether the article about a South Park character should be at Mr. Garrison or Mrs. Garrison; as a "compromise" it was moved to Herbert Garrison, but that does not solve the problem.
 * Talk:Sydney Hilton bombing There is evidence that the bomb was planted by Australian Security forces. Dispute is whether just enumerating this undisputed evidence makes the article POV.  Has been a revert war.  Summary on Talk page.
 * Niger Innis: Is it appropriate to illustrate this article with a photograph of the incident where CNN misspelled his name on-screen as "Nigger Innis"?
 * Talk:L. Ron Hubbard - Dispute on whether L. Ron Hubbard, founder of the Church of Scientology, based his methodology "on the scientific method and an optimized research algorithm" and "recent discoveries in the field of Quantum mechanics have begun to vindicate a great deal of his work." — 3RR violated, 18 reverts in total and counting... Update: 23 reverts in 15 hours, more parts of the article are starting to change. Update: the article was protected, then unprotected, and the intro paragraph gets edited by anon users on a regular basis again, against the consensus on the talk page, reverted by other anon users, then changed again... See the history:

Moved

 * These are old RFCs that were moved here since the list was getting overly long.
 * Talk:Human - Dispute about finding an appropriate introduction to Human between those who want a more scientific introduction and those who want a stronger spiritual or religious component. Several compromise intros have been suggested, none acceptable so far. See here for the versions: Talk:Human/draft. Discussion taking place here.
 * Wikipedia talk:Google test - Dispute over whether the list of examples of where the Google test is invalid is POV. GRider has refused to compromise on his talk page. 18:10, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Talk:Dragostea Din Tei - Another editor, who consulted "some people in the chat room", reverted a rewrite of mine, which I feel improved the article in many various fundamental ways. I would appreciate a wider opinion of the two versions. 00:21, Mar 18, 2005 (UTC)
 * Talk:Israeli settlement. There is a disagreement about the length of the section entitled The Sasson Report. Please read the related Talk discussion and give us your input on whether the section is too long, adequate, or a candidate for a seperate article. Thank you.
 * Talk:Book of Esther - This text needs to be differentiated from the possibly historical figure Esther. The additions to the text need to be discussed. The interpretations of Esther as a didactic fiction as well as a literalist historical document need to be neutrally assessed. There is a Rabbinic tradition that is untouched. I have done what I can. your help is needed.
 * Talk:Ann Coulter - Dispute as to whether Ann Coulter's statement in which she insisted that "Canada sent troops to Vietnam" can be reasonably interpreted as "10,000 former Canadian troops and Canadian citizens crossed the border and joined the United States army to fight in Vietnam." And various related disputes on wording of the article.
 * Talk:MPC (audio compression format) - anonymous user is removing information from the article and accusing people of "trolling" and "propaganda".
 * Nazarene - Two IP editors feel that a section discussing the "Nazarene Judaism" movement of Clint Van Nest is inaccurate, and have been attempting to replace it with a different version. A number of other editors feel that the replaced version violates a number of Wikipedia policies, and insist that the proposed changes need to be discussed and agreed to in Talk: first.
 * (Alternative view) Various IP editors feel that the original version of a section about modern Nazarenes is unsourced slander concucted mainly by User:Jayig and have been attempting to promote enlightened discussion on a fully sourced new version of that section to encourage editing.Specific criticisms have been addressed, but a revet possy all of whom have claimed connections in various places on wiki to the same religious group are doing everything they can to prevent progress.
 * Talk:List of countries that only border one other country, Talk:List of subnational entities and Talk:List of roads and highways - on whether non-sovereign States (i.e. dependent territories) are qualified to be listed.
 * Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Chinese) - on proper titling based on the scope of the content of articles/categories.
 * Capitalism - After a very long process some time ago, consensus was reached concerning the introduction to this article (the main problem is that there are many definitions of capitalism). RJII is constantly deleting content, which other editors must restor, and occasionally adds a new "definition of capitalism" which is either unnecessarily redundant (its elements are already in the introduction) or inappropriate. As one will learn from the talk page (and archived talk pages), RJII has been asked repeatedly to provide a source for his/her definition.  To this date s/he has refused to provide any sources.  Although virtually all of the editors who have been working on this article have had some sharp disagreement, all have ultimately been able to reach some compromise -- except RJII.  Two editors have taken on the burden of reverting RJII's unilateral edits.  Not one single editor has supported RJII's major changes. See refusal to have a serious discussion over content, see an example of a blanket personal insult]
 * Much of this is lies ..particularly about providing sources. But, apparently somebody is upset that they they got the intro of the article just like the wanted it after a lot of work, then someone like me comes along and points out that it's horrible. But, just because it took a lot of effort to get an article any particular way doesn't mean that it's a good article. Sometimes it takes someone such as me that wasn't involved in the process of appeasing each other to take an objective look and point out that an article is bad. I'm sorry, buddy, but I have just as much right to change and article as you have to guard the status quo.

 * Talk:Fear Factor - Dispute on whether it is in reality a game show or reality game show.
 * Black supremacy - Dispute over obvious POV and factual issues such as definition, history, influence and so forth. The article before my edit looks like a long afrocenrist rant, and is likely to be reverted to that version quickly.
 * Diamond - Dispute over use of BCE/CE versus BC/AD dating convention; discussion regarding issue is wholly contained at User talk:Gene Nygaard.
 * Talk:Cool (aesthetic) Disagreement on "Cool (aesthetic)" about excessively verbose intro.
 * LUElinks/Luelinks is a private website whose members insist on creating vanity articles under one or both names. Often reverted as a redirect to GameFAQs from where they spun off.
 * Science & Environmental Policy Project - Can some unaffiliated outsiders with a good sense for Wikipedia standards please comment on, or help resolve, this prolonged edit war.
 * Arbitration policy/Proposed amendment ratification vote - Did this vote pass? Is Jimbo Wales' assent enough to implement the amendment even though a quorum was not met?
 * Talk:Germany Resumed revert war between one user and several others. How to proceed from here? Not much ongoing talk-page discussion of the content.
 * Talk:List of national flags - should Palestine, Israel, and Taiwan have their flags listed?

Ended in Arpil 2005

 * Prem Rawat revert war between user:John_Brauns and anon with ip user:64.81.88.140 about the names used for Prem Rawat/Maharaji with some discussion on the talk page. (The decision was to continue to use the name of Rawat in the article)
 * WikiProject Rankings - proposal was overwhelmingly rejected. An alternative proposal has been floated and discussed without sarcasm.
 * Talk:List of purported cults - agreement was reached on outstanding issues.

 * Talk:Borda count - to resolve a dispute over neutrality, and whether the page as it is currently formatted is a good article or needs cleanup.
 * Talk:First Amendment to the United States Constitution editors do not agree on whether the text of the "virtual admendment" should be included in the main article.
 * Talk:Blink-182 - A fan of the group is removing all mention of the terms "pop" and "pop punk".
 * Talk:Manx (cat) and Manx (cat) - Dispute over wether Manx syndrome exists or not, and other stuff, check talkpage and article's history for good documentation. Thanks.
 * Template_talk:WWIIGermanAFVs - Two users are having a dispute over format and content.
 * Image talk:Photo of magazine page.jpg. How should this image of a bare-chested boy, a bare-breasted woman, and the sleeve of a man be explained? Should it be used to illustrate Pederasty?

Moved

 * These are old RFCs that were moved here since the list was getting overly long
 * Talk:Jubal Harshaw Question on fictional characters' quotations, Wikiquote, standard quotation practices
 * Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User:Cumbey over the Javier Solana case. One user keeps reverting to inaccurate version of article, as in very inaccurate. is Cumbey's version.  is SqueakBox's version.
 * Talk:Revisionist Zionism dispute over the inclusion of factual information about the fascist sympathies of some early right wing Zionists.
 * Talk:Vandalism (big surprise, no?) Stalled discussion wherein an editor on a number of "public password" accounts is pushing to have the article vandalized as an example of its subject matter. Sub-squabble over the status of "public password" accounts.
 * Talk:Rastafarianism. Dispute over changing the name. Dispute is deadlocked.
 * Talk:Javier Solana One user turned the article into evidences that Javier Solana is the Beast of Revelations; the Antichrist. Disputes edits that delete their thesis.
 * Talk:Interval (music) What is the best presentation of similar intervals in different tuning or theoretical systems? By system or by interval? What is the proper way to title alternative presentations? For example, if Interval (music) contains a system by system break down, what would one name the article which contains a comparative listing?
 * Talk:Melanin Re: article subhead on "Role in social and race bias." Back-and-forth/edit war over whether there should be passing reference to this matter or an abbreviated overview of the issue with mention of Wiki-linked examples of skin color bias in various societies -- as well as a brief mention of hair-color stereotyping (since the article also mentions melanin and hair color). For relevant discussion threads in Talk:  portions of "Cleanin' it up" and "Reorganization: crappy, but maybe a start"
 * Talk:Creation science Keep article or merge with Creationism? Debate deadlocked.
 * Talk:Bible One user maintains "Christian Bible" is a pleonasm, while others contend that other religions have Bibles.
 * Talk:Republic The argument is stalled and the page is protected. One user wants to put in an external link and the other refuses to allow external link.  Need comment on stalled process and more input on external links.
 * Requests for Comment/user 220.233.86.223 Threats of legal action and the publishing of one user's complete home address, phone number and email address. One user appears to be threatening another. This is serious.
 * Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Chinese): Subject of few very heated discussions.
 * Alberto Fujimori: subject of edit warring, etc.; at least one contingent are claiming that only Peruvians may write on this topic; even spelling corrections are being reverted.
 * Pedro Santana Lopes Two sets of editors (some dedicated only to this article) with opposing political views are pulling the article backwards and forwards, with no sign of willingness to compromise.
 * Talk:Lists of English words of international origin Implementation of the consensus to excise the dictionaries, formed at Votes for deletion/List of English words of Latin origin and Votes for deletion/List of English words of Greek origin, being unilaterally overturned both here and in all of the linked articles. And an argument that the Wikipedia is not a dictionary policy does not apply to lists of words with their etymologies/translations.
 * Talk:Sydney Hilton bombing Revert war involving a Wikipedia arbitrator(!) removing large well meant contribution without discussion.
 * Talk:Adams motor Is it important to identify this as a claimed perpetual motion device in the opening paragraph? Is the description factually accurate? Is the terminology used, particularly the portions describing it as a "reluctance" motor, acceptable?
 * Talk:Police brutality Should convicted murderer Mumia Abu-Jamal be listed as a victim of police brutality?
 * Talk:Myth Is C.S. Lewis a notable source on myths?
 * Talk:Terri Schiavo POV dispute between a right-to-life activist and a few other editors. Some arguments over terminology, e.g. is Schiavo in a "vegetative state"? Is it NPOV to state that Michael Schiavo is "estranged"?
 * Talk:Criticism of Prem Rawat Can a very long article whose primary content is reported criticism of a particular person be considered to have a neutral point of view? This seems to be a general policy issue, not confined to this article. Exactly the same question can be asked about talk:Allegations against Sathya Sai Baba
 * Talk:Cyber-terrorism Should the content of the article Internet terrorism, which was per VfD turned into a redirect to Cyber-terrorism, be added to that latter article (or any other) even though no vote of the VfD mentioned salvaging or merging any of the content?
 * Talk:Global warming revert war.
 * Talk:Howard Dean - whether an external link to an article analyzing the campaign violates policy

Ended in March 2005

 * Talk:Weight training One user keeps reverting anothers changes.

Ended in February 2005

 * talk:William A. Dembski A particular editor has insisted citations be placed for the statement that intelligent design/specified complexity is perceived by the mainstream scientific community as pseudoscience. This was done. Now that same editor insists on edits that imply the National Academy of Sciences and the National Center for Science Education are not representative of mainstream science; could users look at the page to see what's going on for themselves?
 * Talk:Anarchism - talk page is a trainwreck, w anyone who isn't a left-anarchist being vigorously flamed
 * Talk:Killian documents - State as proven fact that the documents are forgeries?
 * Template talk:Sisterproject - presently, basically a disagreement as to whether the majority vote at a poll should be followed through. (That is, whether the poll is valid.)
 * Talk:StarCraft disagreement over splitting of article. Comments.
 * Talk:Nagorno-Karabakh, a disputed territory. Content dispute resolution in progress. Comments and new participants, please.
 * Talk:RNA world hypothesis Should anon. IP address be inserting links to creationism in a scientific article.
 * Talk:Supercentenarian: Should national age record holders be broken out into a separate article?Should the article avoid tables for the convenience of one editor?
 * Talk:Bombing of Dresden in World War II - One user had deleted text that that user does not like. Another user has re-inserted it. It has become a revert war. Although text written onto the talk page meaningful communication seems impossible.
 * Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Chinese) - does the "NPOV section" of the Chinese naming conventions page itself contain NPOV statements? And do phrases like "China's economy" refer to the economy of the People's Republic of China, or is it necessary to consistently use "economy of the People's Republic of China"?
 * Talk:T-X gynoid/cyborg - T-X is technically a gynoid, not a cyborg. because there are no organic components in her construction. Other editor keeps reverting my edits without stating why they should be reverted. I have left messages on his Talk page which he deletes without comment. I placed a request for discussion on the article's talk page explaining my own position, which he then ignored and went and reverted my edit without comment yet again.
 * Talk:BollywoodSkin color - do South Asians prefer light-skinned matinee idols? Anon editor with strong POV, history of vandalism, engaging in revert war and retaliatory deletions. But he is interacting.
 * Talk:Autofellatio - should we link to a commercial porn site? Does doing so constitute "spamming"? Is calling someone a spammer worse than repeatedly trying to drill into someone's head that one's self is not a spammer? Is it acceptable to change a poll option after people have voted for it?
 * Talk:Human A number of questions regarding a past poll and its results, the positioning of the taxobox and an image, the definition of "Human", if Homo Sapiens should split off into its own article, and even if the "article in need of attention" header is appropriate.
 * Talk:Altruism. How should "altruism" be defined in the article?  (and other issues that stem from that)
 * Talk:Ariel Sharon. Debate over whether details about Israel's unilateral disengagement plan of 2004 belong in the biography of Sharon, or in the article about the disengagement plan.
 * Note: I would phrase this differently: Debate over whether a quotation regarding the Disengagement Plan belongs in the Sharon biography. Saying "details about the Plan" suggests that it is discussed at length, ehich it is not.--A. S. A. 19:57, Feb 14, 2005 (UTC)
 * Right, one particular quote supporting one POV is given at length, and the rest is pretty much ignored. Jayjg (talk) 20:44, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Talk:Quebec sovereignty movement NPOV debate; some proposed edits are of questionable value.
 * Talk:Canadian Federation of Students Ongoing debate on how NPOV the article truly is.
 * Talk:Canadian Alliance of Student Associations Ongoing debate on how NPOV the article truly is.
 * Wikipedia talk:Template messages - whether templates like POV check and expand list belong in article or talk pages. It would be appreciated if someone helps structure the debate.
 * Surrealism - dispute over POV of recent additions to introduction.
 * Talk:Germany - Should the article on Germany adhere to WikiProject Countries, or not?
 * Nofollow - Should external links be ignored by Google? Voting open Feb. 12 to Feb. 19.
 * This is indirectly a survey over content issues, because it affects the behavior of every external link on every page.
 * Template talk:Magic-stub - Dispute wether or not to use a pentacle for a stub's image.
 * Talk:Afrocentrism - Need help in establishing how the critical scholarship tends to view claims made by Afrocentric scholars. Few participants are familliar with this topic, except for one editor who is markedly on the Afrocentric side.
 * Talk:Liberal Party of Australia - Discussion on the style/policies/platform of government of a political party (conservative vs. neoliberal), discussion is deadlocked (please read Liberal Party of Australia to see the first paragraph).
 * Talk:Safavids - Protracted edit and revert war between two editors on the origin of the Safavid dynasty in Iran (1501-1736). One argues Safavids were Turkic-speaking, other claims the dynasty has Kurdish and/or Persian ethnicity.
 * Talk:Northern Europe - On whether Wikipedia articles should try to change how terms and concepts are understood, or maybe just relect and report how they are used in English
 * Talk:Death_Star How big is the Death Star?
 * Talk:Second_Chechen_War - The other Wiki's Chechnya articles are related to this one. The Article 'Second Chechen War' and the impartial Analyses and Reports resume deserves professional writing due to the sensitive political situation and Genocide topically on the spot.BBC viewpoints
 * Talk:Howard Zinn - anonymous user wants to add (original) criticism of Zinn to the article
 * Wave-particle duality: a popularized section was deleted, see the talk page
 * Brandon Teena - dispute over whether subject should be referred to using "he" or "she". Subject was biologically female, but identified and lived as a man.
 * Fair trade - Dispute over the correct way to introduce free trade in relationship to fair trade.
 * Talk:Elohim - An anon ISP user keeps changing it so the article states that "Elohim" means "Those who came from the sky". This is a Raelian belief, which belongs under the ==Raelian== heading, however, not in the main body of the article.
 * Outposts of tyranny - contains the phrase "is often highly criticised", but doesn't state whether the criticism is right or wrong. Most seem to agree this is therefore neutral, although an edit war caused by one user who has decided this is not the case seems to be brewing.
 * Marietta, Georgia - a slow-speed revert war in process, several people involved.
 * This is only one problem user, who has a fixation on Marietta and Phil Gingrey. He was banned from the latter and his behavior here looks no different. He should be banned from Marietta as well. alteripse 00:52, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Talk:Ahmad Shamlou - this article was originally a copyright vio. On contact, the real author is not happy, but allows it to remain (?). Please comment
 * Talk:E³ - should the article be at this title or at Electronic Entertainment Expo?
 * Talk:Halo 2 - Quickly becoming a revert war
 * Talk:Lucas David - Dispute over his nationality. A disputed tag gets constantly removed.
 * Images for deletion Relisting of Image:Tn toyslove angie.jpg and several others for which the original vote did not establish consensus which could have been because of lack of attention.
 * Talk:Progress Report of the United Nations Mediator on Palestine - Dispute over whether a quotation is "famous", or should be characterized that way.
 * Talk:Blitzkrieg - Dispute over inclusion of material.
 * Talk:Robert Byrd - Disagreement between two users over the truthfulness of additions to the article and whether they constitute POV. Discussion has not been productive.
 * Talk:Post-invasion Iraq, 2003-2005 The article formerly called Occupation of Iraq, 2003-2005 was renamed Post-invasion Iraq, 2003-2005. Some editors agree with the change; some don't. Comment would be helpful.
 * User_talk:Wik - (please don't comment on that page directly) - dispute over whether a link to User:Vandalbot should be placed on the page. Please make comments on User_talk:Vandalbot.
 * Talk:Bahá'í Faith - Baha'is and non-Baha'i cannot agree on placement of certain info and photos and the wording of a section title.
 * Talk:The Powerpuff Girls - Two users are in a dispute over how the article should be categorized.
 * May have already been resolved. Peter O. (Talk) 23:46, Jan 31, 2005 (UTC)
 * Talk:Internet Explorer - Persistent neutrality dispute, with editors on both sides of an issue accusing the other of being blinded by bias. Editors on both sides taking an "edit-war first, explain on the talk page later" attitude.
 * One side had announced his resignation. Peter O. (Talk) 23:46, Jan 31, 2005 (UTC)
 * Talk:Race - Dispute between one user and other editors. Revert war (user has reverted the page 4x in three hours, 5x in 22 hours).  Some editors remove dispute tags while there is an outstanding and lengthy dispute.
 * Talk:Gundam Mark II — no dispute, it's just that the anonymously-written entry lacks vital information which I can't provide.
 * Category talk:Intercollegiate athletics - the contents of this category is inaccurate relative to its description, and perhaps too US-centric.
 * Talk:Historical revisionism One user is adding information. Another user is reverting most additions because he thinks they are POV. An email sent by one party to the other has been published on the talk page. As it seems that only three people are involved in the discussion a few more voices might help to establish a consensus.
 * Talk:America%27s_Army issues over whether two definitions of the game should be listed should be listed, or only one.
 * Talk:2004 U.S. presidential election controversy and irregularities - There is debate over how the articles should be structured, especially the main page (should it be replaced with a summary article drafted separately, or edited and filtered down into a summary?).
 * Talk:Nineteen Eighty-Four: Issues of original research and Don't disrupt the wiki to prove a point.
 * Talk:Mainland China: Whether to include the significance of the term "mainland China", to distinguish from Hong Kong and Macao because of the One Country, Two Systems provisions.
 * Talk:1944: Where is the line (and should there be one) for births and deaths listed in the year articles?
 * Talk:U.S. presidential election, 2004: Should it be stated that the Minnesota 'faithless elector' is believed to have been accidental?
 * Talk:Surrealism: Dispute over who is to define "surrealism", repeated removals of material.
 * Talk:Eastern philosophy: The inclusion of maoism in the category that the article describes is controvercial, also there was a bizarre redirect to Talk:Eastern culture which created a good deal of confusion.
 * Talk:Charlottetown Accord: Flagged as neutrality dispute by an anon user on Jan 1; user has provided no further information as to what their concern is.
 * Talk:Chernobyl: Dispute over inclusion of mugwort and wormwood in the article.
 * Talk:World Chess Championship: Concerning pictures and how to place them.
 * Talk:Estimates of the Palestinian Refugee flight of 1948: 472,000 is not estimate
 * Talk:Polygamy: Should the article on polygamy contain a link to a site with personal ads "for people looking to meet single women seeking polygamy"?
 * Talk:President of the Palestinian Authority: Should the title of the article use "President" or "Ra'ees" (or perhaps "Chairman")? 19:52, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Talk:Israel: Should the second sentence read "It has a parliamentary system ..." or "It is a parliamentary democracy ..."?
 * Talk:Hearing impairment. On the placement of Deaf and Deafness in relation to Hearing impairment or the "Deaf" culture.
 * Talk:Open gaming. Two users disagree on the content of the article. One user thinks that a certain passage is necessary, factual, and relevant to the article. Another user thinks the disputed passage is irrelevant and highly POV. Attempts at rational discussion between the two parties have not been fruitful. It is hoped that a community consensus would aid in resolving the dispute.
 * Talk:Natural monopoly. One editor and one admin seem to be exerting an untoward amount of control over the article, including the admin unprotecting an article which was protected because of back-and-forth reverting in which he was involved. Dispute resolution in the talk page is stalled, with the controlling faction apparently under the belief that WP:NPA doesn't apply to them.
 * Page was protected (by a different admin) to stop a revert war over one user insisting on the insertion of a badly-written paragraph with very little relevant content. User was not amenable to reasonable argument (which along with said editor's ignorance of a well-defined economic term incidentally led to the WP:NPA issues). So rather than leave the page protected indefinitely, the admin who had been involved in editing unprotected the page. The disputed paragraph (now grown even more unwieldy) has been allowed to stand, so what exactly is the issue here?? Yes, the article is still a mess, which is why I posted it on WP:PR. Rd232 08:36, 16 Jan 2005 (UTC)

 * Talk:Polish-Soviet_War A POV notice. RfC suggested, as there is still no consensus. Thank you for your comments.
 * Settled. RfC no longer needed. Tnx. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 23:55, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Talk:2003 Invasion of Iraq Is it POV to refer to the Saddam Hussein government as a "regime"?
 * It's not just Saddam; we should consider use of the word in general, a subject raised at Wikipedia talk:Neutral point of view.
 * Talk:Intelligent design Two users have requested dispute resolution.  One claims the page to be a "bad faith fraud."  POV concerns, much reverting going on.
 * Talk: Mestizo. Validity of statistics.
 * Talk:Joshua A. Norton. Is referring to this gentleman as "Emperor of the United States" throughout his article misleading or appropriate? Is humorously referring to a faux emperor's reign, decrees, etc. misleading and contrary to the facts?
 * Talk:Christian views of homosexuality - an extensive essay about the Eastern Orthodox views of sin and sexuality in general evades touching the subject of the actual Eastern Orthodox views of homosexuality.
 * Talk:Perverted-Justice.com - dispute between two article versions.
 * Talk:Elton John: should the article use hyphens instead of dashes?
 * Talk:QuakeAID - is it a violation of the NPOV policy for the article to state that QuakeAID "fraudulently misrepresents themselves"?
 * Talk:Free-content – Regarding the bloating of the article.
 * Talk:Male circumcision - POV dispute.
 * Talk:Republican Party (United States) and Talk:Democratic Party (United States) - A variety of controversial changes: Should articles repeatedly blame slavery on the Democratic Party? Should information about the history of the Republican Party be remove? etc.
 * Category talk:Languages of Wikipedia Projects - Should the content of this category be changed from articles about languages to articles about wikipedia projects in that language? No real dispute, I'm listing this here because "category talk:" usually does not get much attention.
 * Talk:Macedonian Slavs - Should we cite a population estimate that some people disagree with?
 * Talk:Sollog - an argument between critics and supporters of Sollog (members of the Temple of 'Hayah, accused of being Sollog's sock-puppets), mostly about the accuracy of quake predictions and the NPOV
 * Talk:List of Palestinian children killed by Israelis in 2004 - What should have been a plain list of names has suddenly turned into a full-out edit war with proselytizing that will end up as long as the list. Also, note that the article is to be transwikied.
 * Talk:List of Quebec television series - The question has been raised whether List of Quebec television series should be merged into List of Canadian television series; the consensus was to keep them split, but one user insists on merging them.
 * Talk:Frankfurt School - Should Kevin B. MacDonald be listed as a "notable critic" of the Frankfurt School in the absence of any evidence of his being cited or regarded as such?
 * Talk:Abraham Lincoln - Should the section on Lincoln's sexuality be removed from the main page?
 * Talk:Great Game or Talk:The Great Game - should the title of this article be Great Game or The Great Game?
 * Talk:Lev Davidovich Landau There is a discussion on the (polit)correctness of using the adjective "Russian" with respect to ethnically non-Russian people.

Ended in January 2005

 * Talk:Tsunami Should there be a pronouciation guide for 'tsunami', and what form should it take?
 * Talk:International Socialists (Canada) - should the article include critical opinions of the IS?
 * Talk:Little_Green_Footballs - Dispute over the inclusion and placement of a paragraph in the article text that specifically directs readers to a single external link containing highly critical comments about the article subject. Dispute seems to have waged for quite some time, all surrounding a single frequent editor of this article. Said editor has also begun attacking other editors in the discussion forum for additions made on completely unrelated articles elsewhere on wikipedia.
 * Talk:Chess - Should we include a paragraph talking about computer chess events as being "Publicity stunts".
 * Talk:Therianthropy - attempts to insert POV material
 * Talk:Norway Scholarship - should the holders of the scholarship be listed?
 * Talk:Polymath and Talk:List of polymaths-Disagreement wether Ken Jennings should be listed as a polymath
 * Talk:Joe Scarborough; should death of an aide be mentioned in his article
 * Talk:Main page; should there be a 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake donation box on the front page?
 * Talk:Main_Page/intro - New Main Page introduction text. Vote or comment.
 * Talk:Great Game or Talk:The Great Game - should the title of this article be Great Game or The Great Game?
 * Talk:Bash.org - Does the fork of bash called "QDB.us" deserve mention in the article? What about open source clone "Rash QMS"?
 * Talk:Free market - are there "free or ideal markets" in the underground economy?
 * Talk:Kenneth Bigley - Should articles about the hostages in Iraq who have been beheaded include links to the videos showing their deaths?
 * Talk:Historicity of Jesus. Dispute over whether the section entitled "The Pauline Epistles" is relevant to the Historicity of Jesus.
 * Talk:Red Ensign - should the article mention the use of the Canadian red ensign by neo-nazi groups?
 * Talk:List of words having different meanings in British and American English - Discussion surrounding 'syrup'
 * Talk:Vojvodina - One of the most multinational region's of Europe needs some input, so that its turbulent history can be described in an accurate and neutral way, instead from the exclusive point of view of one group of inhabitants.
 * Talk:Autobiography (album) - should this album article go into some detail and some of its content moved into singles articles when it grows too large, or should it simply be a brief summary without any breakout articles?
 * Talk:Comparison of web browsers - lack of consensus regarding data presentation and color coding
 * Talk:Sealand: A legal history - should this article be named "Sealand: A Legal History" or "Legal history of Sealand"? Also an NPOV dispute (renamed Legal history of Sealand)

Ended in December 2004
(mostly died out or moved on)
 * Talk:Chess - Where did the game of Chess originate?
 * Talk:Laser - dispute over removals of incomprehensible convoluted sentences and mention of uncorroborated theory of "liquid light".
 * Talk:Patricia Heaton - Article is being reverted beyond the 3RR by all parties (one side being anon) between an attempted rewritten version and another which a user has claimed to have withdrawn their permission for after a previous dispute.
 * Talk:Tucson, Arizona - An RfC success story: A vote was held between two versions that differ on where the indigenous name for the city should be, twenty-two votes were cast, and one version prevailed. Thanks to everyone who voted. You can still come by to edit or propose something new. (This RfC item is now concluded and ready for archiving.)
 * Talk:Empire of Atlantium - Discussion concerning the wording of a single sentence.
 * Talk:Stop consonant Are nasal stops stops or not? Seeking comments on whether we should state the commonly held view that they are or branch out on our own. Linguists particularly welcome.
 * Five articles that were written by one editor, and entirely deleted and replaced by different articles by another editor:
 * Talk:William Spence
 * Talk:Frank Anstey
 * Talk:John Dunmore Lang
 * Talk:King O'Malley
 * Talk:Daniel Deniehy
 * Talk:Criticisms of War on Terrorism - Seeking comments on whether the use of quotation marks constitute a NPOV issue and if the article requires the cleanup boilerplate.
 * Talk:Patricia Cornwell - seeking comments regarding the placement of information about Cornwell's book about Jack the Ripper.
 * Talk:Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki - Seeking comments on whether the section on arguments favoring the bombings should include reference to conscription
 * Talk:Capitalism - Need comments on how the article should describe "characteristics of capitalism".
 * Talk:Schiller Institute Which version is comes closer to NPOV: this one by SlimVirgin, or this one by Herschelkrustofsky?
 * Talk:Hate_group - Should text regarding Hate groups and new religious movements, or specific statements in that section alleging what organizations are hate groups, be excised from the article?
 * Talk:Drum Corps International - See article history for reverts; is this a 'reasonable' edit war or an NPOV issue -- if so, which point of view is more NPOV? Equally Talk:Drum and bugle corps (modern) for the same issue. Is this in fact a vandalism case? (Inactive)
 * Talk:Lenora Fulani - Should the article include information about her political mentor and close associate, Fred Newman, and the political organizations he founded (with which she is also closely associated)? (probably resolved)
 * Talk:Viking dispute surrounding the scandinavian vs. the English usage of the word "Viking" as well as the content of the article.
 * Talk:Côte d'Ivoire Should this article be moved to Ivory Coast, the name most English speakers use? Or should the article reflect the wishes of this country's government?
 * Talk:Bob Jones University What's the best term in this particular context? "Blacks," "Negroes," "African-Americans," whatever? (Resolved)
 * Talk:Creation vs. evolution debate Should two sections consisting almost entirely of quotes, with flimsy attempts at connecting prose, be part of the article?
 * Talk:The Road to Serfdom Overiding bias against this book was the theme of this article until a couple minutes ago. Need an eye kept on it and neutral additions made
 * Talk:Hausdorff-Besicovitch dimension - this is often referred to as the Hausdorff dimension, but it is credited to Abram Samoilovitch Besicovitch as well as Felix Hausdorff. Which title should the article have? (Resolved to use title Hausdorff dimension)
 * Talk:Perennial candidate - should three time presidential candidate Ralph Nader be listed as a perennial candidate or is three attempts too low a threshold for inclusion? (Inactive)
 * Talk:Nicolae Ceausescu - whether recent additions are legitimate or amount to conspiracy theory.
 * Talk:Romanian Revolution of 1989 - whether recent additions are legitimate or amount to conspiracy theory.
 * Articles related to the circumcision controversy:
 * Talk:Foreskin fetish - dispute between two versions of article
 * Talk:Circumcision fetish - dispute reverts between two versions of article
 * Talk:Circumcision — POV argument over "anti-circumcision agenda"
 * Talk:Masturbation - should this article repeatedly mention the obscure purported traumatic masturbatory syndrome, which scraped through VfD, and whose article is mainly an explanation of how obscure the references to it are?
 * Talk:Sexual intercourse - NPOV dispute over circumcision, also referencing in-depth article vs discussion of same
 * Talk:Arab-Israeli conflict - Are the 9/11 attacks and Iraq war related to the Arab-Israeli conflict?
 * Talk:Al-Aqsa Intifada - Is it balanced and NPOV to use loaded terms like "lynched" and "murdered" in reference to deceased Israeli soldiers while only using the word "killed" to refer to deceased Palestinian civilians?
 * Talk:Vlaams Belang - According to the points of view, either just a new name for the Vlaams Blok, a Belgian political party, or a new political party. What's better: two separate articles or one only?
 * Talk:2004 U.S. presidential election controversy and irregularities - All of the data in this article needs to be reliably verifiable, or removed.
 * Talk:Medical analysis of circumcision - POV dispute over introduction
 * Talk:Atheism - Basic disagreement over whether atheism is a passive or an active stance as well as whether one must be either atheist or theist by definition.
 * Talk:Artificial consciousness - The whole talk page was deleted by user 80.4.32.9, previously 30% of the article was deleted by a single user, then the whole article was moved to Strong AI and replaced by a completely new text. I think that this is not a way to edit Wikipedia articles. The user was contacted.
 * Talk:Green Party (United States) - Should an article about the general politics, history, and activity of the Green Party in the United States -- encompassing various organizations and splits -- be titled generically, as with the Democratic and Republican Parties, or should it be titled so as to refer to the current leading national organization? (No responses.)
 * Talk:Occupation of Iraq, 2003-2004 How much material on the invasion should be included? (Discussion apparently died out.)
 * Talk:Black September (group) - Is it appropriate to use weasel words like "some sources" and "linked to (terrorist group)" to falsely state that Yasser Arafat "controlled" or "led" Black September? (Discussion moved on to other issues.)

Ended in November 2004

 * Talk:September 11, 2001 attacks - Should the current truce on use of the word "terrosist" be followed? Should the attacks be described as "freedom fighter" attacks? Should information about the location of the crashes be taken out of the introduction? (New user apparently decided to follow consensus.)
 * Talk:Translation - discussion regarding the appropriateness of external links. See also Talk:Favicon.
 * Talk:People's Republic of China heavy dispute over Deng Xiaoping's economic policies and whether they brought a higher standard of living to China
 * This dispute has been more or less resolved. -- ran [[User talk:Ran|(talk)]] 15:54, Nov 13, 2004 (UTC)
 * talk:hate group - What elements of a hate group should be mentioned? Should unreferenced elements be mentioned. (Resolved on November 3, 2004, by mentioning two elements as unreferenced)
 * Talk:Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact - on the existence of the confidential protocol, and on credibility of Soviet propaganda in general
 * This seems to have been resolved Ruy Lopez 23:38, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Ended in October 2004

 * Talk:International_Humanitarian_Law - Disagreement over the differences between Laws of War and International Humanitarian Law. "Basic Rules of IHL" also disputed. (Apparently ended in October 2004.)
 * Talk:Style guide - Should references to "descriptive" style guides be removed until a source is given stating that any style guide is purely descriptive and not prescriptive? (Resolved October 31, 2004, mainly by removal of the words "descriptive" and "prescriptive.")
 * Talk:Chen Duxiu - Group of users, namely User talk:0101CHANhk. 0101, continuously changing the page to what they feel belongs there, namely linking non-english articles and putting back anything cut out. Its difficult because they DO want to contribute legitimately but have seriously messed up the talk page and the article itself at times. (Problem ended in October 2004.)
 * Talk:Surrealism - various content disputes. Please vote in the poll regarding the inclusion of Keith Wigdor's recent manifesto. (Dispute apparently ended in October 2004.)
 * Talk:Exxon Mobil - Should verified, factually correct information be deleted from this article, when that information is insignficent and makes the article unneutral by lack of counter-point (Dispute apparently died out in October 2004.)
 * Talk:Call for help - is the definition of a "call for help" a tautology? (Dispute apparently ended in October 2004.)
 * Talk:Jehovah -- neutrality dispute over specific religious POV vs generic interpretation of term (Dispute apparently ended in October 2004.)
 * Talk:Jehovah's Witnesses and the Holocaust - no reason given on the talk page as to why NPOV is disputed. (Dispute apparently died out in October 2004.)

Miscellaneous

 * Talk:Israel Shahak - Is it appropriate to refer to unrelated anti-semitic websites in this article about Israel Shahak?
 * Talk:NGO Monitor - Is NGO Monitor engaging in pro-Israel advocacy/hasbara?
 * Talk:Hasbara - Is hasbara a form of propaganda?
 * Talk:M. Karunanidhi - Attempts to get User:Rrjanbiah to justify a categorization that is not supported by the text of the article. Rrjanbiah has had almost three months to justify his assertion, but has provided no evidence to back up his claim.  Apparently it is 'well known fact'.
 * Talk:Neopets. New user claims to be one of two long-lost co-founders of the Neopets website. Should they be allowed to add their name to the article as a co-founder?
 * Talk:American World University The link to American World University originally in the article has the effect of improving the AWU site's Google pagerank. Is this a problem? If so, how can it be solved? Is the use of this tinyurl link, improving tinyurl's pagerank, acceptable practice?
 * Talk:Rutgers_University Should rugby football or soccer be mentioned as the basis for the first recorded football game between two US colleges?
 * Talk:Something Awful Forums A bit of a problem involving whether or not the article needs to be heavily pruned down. Would greatly appreciate outside comment.  Also see Votes for deletion/Something Awful Forums
 * Talk:Zürich Zurich orZürich see also Village_pump_(policy).
 * Talk:Empire of Atlantium has had an edit war and two protections over a very minor change in wording. Please vote here for the wording you prefer, so we can resolve this edit war once and for all.
 * Talk:Australian Labor Party Was King O'Malley a significant intellectual influence in the early ALP? If so, does this represent an influence of American System economic ideas?
 * Talk:United Nations Children's Fund This short article seems to be being used to pursue an argument about another issue, leading to an imbalance.  Any attempt to remove the relevant content is reverted.  Discussion not making progress.
 * Talk:Collectivism Failure to agree on facts, presentation.
 * Talk:Winter Soldier Investigation - revert wars claiming unspecified POVs, resulting in page protections
 * Talk:France severe POV problems, vandalism
 * Talk:History of the United States (1865-1918) severe POV problems and multiple editors who revert to their preferred version
 * Talk:Jew Watch - is it NPOV to describe the website as "anti-Semitic" and "controversial". Should the website be described as having been "censored"?
 * Talk:Reformed Egyptian - The Book of Mormon says it is an ancient book that was written with reformed Egyptian characters, which only Mormons believe. How can we best characterize this in the article? Is it fair to say there is no non-Mormon evidence of such writing's existence? Is it fair to suppress that fact?
 * Talk:Saint Peter, Talk:Saint Joseph, Talk:Saint Andrew- Who did decide that Saint~ is the most common name? Please advise.
 * Talk:History_of_Turkey - cannot agree on Armenian Genocide inclusion/wording
 * Talk:Regime_change_in_Iraq - NPOV dispute over whether it's an "occupation" or a "regime change," and the opinions these wordings represent.
 * Talk:InuYasha - Should InuYasha use the more common but-not-technically-correct "Tetsusaiga" or the technically-correct-but-less-common "Tesseiga"?
 * Talk:List of Communist Parties - should the Spartacist League be listed?
 * Talk:Project for the New American Century - Please come and help lift protection imposed after an edit war.
 * Talk:Cross-dressing Quite a little edit war going on on the inclusion of Joan of Arc and whether including her into this article implies anything "indeecent" about her.
 * Talk:Genocides in history how can allegations regarding Israel and Palestine be included NPOV and relevant to genocide? Are allegations of acts of anti-Semitism topical as "incitement to genocide" if the acts are not themselves genocide?
 * Talk:Shipston-on-Stour and User talk:G-Man is this in Warwickshire or Worcestershire? It is in both, according to policy.
 * Talk:Communist state - a heavy editwar regarding deaths caused by communist rule. See the "Death toll" section in the discussion page.
 * Talk:Khmer Rouge - NPOV dispute regarding U.S. involvement/support and number killed - This worse than this goes as far as denying that there was agenocide.
 * Talk:Falun Gong - NPOV dispute; one side of an edit war keeps removing NPOV header from main page
 * Talk:Malaysia - neutrality dispute over phrasing and mentioning of certain facts
 * Talk:Malaysian New Economic Policy - neutrality dispute over phrasing and mentioning of certain facts
 * Talk:Bumiputra - neutrality dispute over phrasing and mentioning of certain facts
 * Talk:Eroticism in film - Should the section "Partial list of films showing nude or underwear scenes" be included?
 * Talk:List of unrecognized countries Do Sealand and Seborga belong on this list?
 * Talk:Lyndon LaRouche Debate over how much space to devote to quotes from various critics and/or opponents of LaRouche, which has lead once again to page protection
 * Talk:Winter_Soldier_Investigation - Multiple editors and POV
 * Talk:Enclave - Contention over the territorial status of the Sovereign Military Order of Malta.
 * Talk:Accountancy - Which is the more common usage: "accountancy" or "accounting"?
 * Talk:Jehovah's Witnesses and Talk:Non-Christian perspectives on Jesus: it's a dispute that Jehovah's Witnesses is a Christianity group or not.
 * Talk:San Francisco 49ers Should a fan be allowed to post a link to an "unofficial site"? It may be helpful to read the discussion taking place, and visit the link to decide on the validity of it on Wikipedia
 * Talk:MP3 - An anonymous user insists on removing criticism of MP3 on the basis that he is an "expert" and is the only one qualified to comment on the subject. Says his edits are "100% fact (not up for discussion)" and calls other edits "stubborn nonsense."
 * Talk:Princess Olga of Greece and Denmark: is it "non-neutral" to refer to Princess Olga of Greece and Denmark as Princess Olga of Greece and Denmark?
 * Talk:1982 Invasion of Lebanon - How much background material is necessary for this article?
 * Talk:Islam - Repeated attempts by Salafis to replace external links in Islam article with links to Salafi sites. No communication from the Salafis.
 * Talk:Cat Stevens — Should Cat Stevens contain detailed coverage of the recent denial of entry into the U.S.?
 * Talk:Elizabeth I of England - Should a caption be added for a biographical picture?
 * Talk:Domestic policy of the George W. Bush administration - Is a statement by 10 nobel laurates and >450 economists "notable"?
 * Talk:List_of_religions - should geographical/national references be used in relation to religion categories?
 * Talk:Great Lakes - should the disambiguation page be at Great Lakes or at Great Lakes (disambiguation).
 * Resolved. Status quo (Great Lakes still refers to North American Great Lakes). [[User:Poccil|Peter O. (Talk)]] 06:06, Oct 18, 2004 (UTC)
 * Talk:Anwar Ibrahim - is the article NPOV? Just looking for viewpoints other than the principal authors'.
 * Talk:0/0 - Dispute on whether this article should be included.
 * Resolved. Page is now at Division by zero. [[User:Poccil|Peter O. (Talk)]] 06:06, Oct 18, 2004 (UTC)
 * Talk:Anti-American sentiment - A controversy on correct language and correct Wikiquette and similar things, where protection seems to have resulted in stalled discussions rather than a solution
 * Talk:Dick_Cheney - Help nip a potential dispute in the bud about langauge surrounding Mary Cheney's lesbianism.
 * Talk:Libertarianism - Dispute on what libertarianism is
 * Talk:Swift Boat Veterans for Truth - Should the year "1971", in referrence to the year of John Kerry's Senate testimony about Vietnam, be included in the 1st paragraph introduction?
 * Talk:Clitoris - Dispute on whether a photograph or a drawing should be used.
 * Talk: Weimar Timeline: should this article be divided into two articles or combined into one article?
 * Dormant. [[User:Poccil|Peter O. (Talk)]] 06:06, Oct 18, 2004 (UTC)
 * Talk:Flecainide: persistent copyvio material being added to the article.
 * Talk:Circumcision and Talk:History of male circumcision: A two-week edit war has turned a formerly balanced article into a confusing mess of criticisms and rebuttals.
 * Talk:Classical_definition_of_republic NPOV dispute; the dispute covers only a very small part of the article, but it seems that no consensus can be reached.
 * Talk:Eligible receiver I'm not sure how true the content is.
 * Talk:Atmospheric_reentry The original content disagreement has spiralled out of control.
 * Talk:Nazism - should Nazism be described as a reactionary or revolutionary ideology?
 * Talk:United States Republican Party -- should an external link to "Republicans for Kerry," a special interest group of registered Republicans, be removed or stay?
 * Talk:Asian Cup 2004 - contents and manners
 * Talk:T. Cullen Davis Should the existing articles on 3 of the victims be merged into the accused's article, and become redirects to it?
 * Talk:Acronym - dispute over initialisms, resolved by rewrite
 * Talk:Affirmative action many problems, see recent edit history
 * Talk:Windows XP - addition of text to the Windows XP Starter Edition section
 * Resolved that text can stay. [[User:Poccil|Peter O. (Talk)]] 06:06, Oct 18, 2004 (UTC)
 * Category talk:Birmingham, England - Should many of the articles in that category be removed from it due to overcategorization?
 * Talk:The Carpetbaggers - presence of NPOV tag
 * Category talk:Art - How wide should the category of Painters be drawn?
 * Talk:Quantum mechanics - An anonymous user wants to add stuff about certain quantum electrochemists, several others think it should not be included.
 * Talk:Hugo Chávez - POV intro
 * Talk:Matt Drudge - Revert war
 * Talk:Project for the New American Century - Poll over NPOV dispute, to get page unprotected.
 * Talk:Falcon I (and Falcon V+SpaceX) — Should articles be allowed to include pricing info and use language that at least one user considers advertising? - resolved with apology and article changes
 * Talk:Oradour-sur-Glane - should the article include mention of other massacres in order to show how this massacre was less important?
 * Talk:CHSH inequality This article is copied in other encylopaedias etc but is largely wrong. I have suggested a re-write.  Should I go ahead?
 * Talk:Effeminacy - Definition of effeminacy. Also borderline personal attacks.
 * Talk:Uncanny Valley - should Roger Ebert's opinions be mentioned in the article, and if so, how?
 * Image talk:Seldon.jpg - should the image be included in the Hari Seldon and The Foundation Series articles?
 * Talk:Ladislaus - should Ladislaus or Vladislaus be used as primary spelling of the name for Polish kings?
 * Talk:Yeshu - Should the article state at the start that references to Yeshu in the Talmud are believed by most scholars to be references to Jesus, or should it first discuss Yeshu without mentioning Jesus and then discuss the identification with Jesus as a minority view?
 * Talk:Nazarene Judaism The Dispute is over whether to reveal the netzarim movement as a branch of mordern orthodox Judaism or to present it as a form of apostate Messianic Judaism.
 * Talk:Evolutionism just generally request any comments from people who are not as POV as us two.
 * Talk:Mesa, Arizona - Should articles include the Pima language or any other foreign name in the article headers?
 * Inactive since early August. [[User:Poccil|Peter O. (Talk)]] 06:06, Oct 18, 2004 (UTC)
 * Talk:Childlover is an article about pedophiles. Conflicts are about whether it should argue that "non-violent" "consensual" sex with children is nothing bad, whether it should display a list of links to forums of such people, and whether it should have links to organizations that help both pedophiles searching for treatment and those who suffer from the described "love".
 * Talk:Anti-American_sentiment: Dispute over how to include alleged consequence of terrorism and view that fundamentalist islamic terrorism is not directed solely against the US, wording of introduction.
 * Talk:Anti-Semitism - Dispute over allegedly anti-Semitic edits.
 * Talk:Media coverage of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict - What should the scope of the article be (e.g. should Mordechai Vanunu be included), and how should allegations (e.g. of Israel influencing the western media) be presented?
 * Talk:Timeline of Slovene history - dispute whether information about the two Slovenian political leaders being sued for alleged war crimes by some Serbian political parties should be included. Similar dispute was on Talk:Janez Drnovsek (for both Milan Kucan and Janez Drnovsek) and the community almost-consensus was not to include it until the International Court of Justice has decided to hear it.
 * Talk:Drew Barrymore - should information as to whether Drew Barrymore is nude in each movie she has made relevant material for inclusion in Wikipedia?
 * Talk:Hawaii - Hawaii or Hawai‘i?
 * Talk:Sailor Moon — Should the character names use the original Japanese name, or should they use the names used in the manga released by TokyoPop in North America (Most fans use Japanese names but no known "official" English adaptations stick or stick completely to Japanese names)
 * Talk:Sociobiological theories of rape a great deal of POV fussing regarding a topic I know little about, I intend to bow out. See what sense you can make of it, and be sure to review the edit history.
 * Talk:Michel Lafosse - should article be at this location or at Prince Michael of Albany?
 * Talk:Vilnius and Talk:Gdansk - tiresome city naming discussion
 * Category talk:Cold War people - discussion as to how extensive this category should be, and whether additions of people whose article don't discuss their involvement in the Cold War should be included.
 * Talk:Invisible Pink Unicorn - There is difficulty in reaching agreement about which image captions would most accurately describe their images.
 * Talk:Micronation: Whether so called fifth-world micronations should be included in the article.
 * Talk:John Boone: The Red Mars page had several stubs on the individual characters in this series, such as John Boone which were listed on 'Votes for Deletion'. Talk page indicates consensus of the deletion votes was to redirect to Red Mars page rather than delete the stubs. Subsequently, a user wishes to remove the redirects and develop the stubs. Early discussion may be found at Talk:Red Mars.
 * Talk:Phil Gingrey--anon repeatedly adding POV, emphasizing unimportant incident to make Gingrey look bad. Refuses to compromise on talk, or propose other changes.
 * Talk:Lyndon LaRouche - dispute over NPOV of two different versions of the article
 * Talk:Nikola Tesla - insertion and reversion of extreme POV material.
 * Talk:Iran-Contra Affair: Dispute over whether to label the elected Nicaraguan Sandinista government as "Soviet-aligned".
 * Talk:Ronald Reagan: Dispute over whether to include allegations of rape by Reagan in the article. See Talk:Ronald_Reagan for background.
 * Talk:Ship model - discussion on whether ship model or model ship is the correct term for the purposes of primary article name. One party is changing multiple articles without reaching consensus.
 * Talk:Central Europe - on editing style and usefulness of reference to language usage in news papers - whether Central Europe particularly in the Western World frequently is taken to include also Liechtenstein, Switzerland and Germany
 * Talk:Nebra skydisk - Apparently mainstream and sensible material about this archaeoastronomical object is being consistently suppressed. Would folks with some archaeological grounding, and no superBriton axe to grind, please look at the article, the Talk page and the History, and bring some neutral sense and good manners to this problem?
 * Talk:Unlawful_combatant - Dispute over interpretations of the Fourth Geneva Convention—is the material within the proper scope of the article? Are the disputed interpretations original research?
 * Talk:Saddam Hussein - Lir insisting that the use of the name "Saddam" can be argued to be demeaning, vs. many other Wikipedians who have already had this discussion.
 * Talk:Sacred fire of Vesta - Dispute over relevance of Nikola Tesla and related references.
 * Talk:Kim Sun-il -- dispute over whether or not to include external links to videos, one showing his execution, and to stills, neither showing his execution.
 * Talk:Chelation therapy--dispute over whether statistic on use of chelation therapy in NCCAM report should be included--the report itself says that this statistic is not reliable or precise.
 * Talk:Grand Admiral - Should this article be split into two? One dealing with Star Wars and the other with Germany.  or remain a single unified article about Grand Admiral.
 * Talk:European Union - whether Nazi plans for a united Europe ought to be mentioned in the history section of the main article on the European Union, if it could be kept in the article on EU's history, or if it shouldn't be mentioned at all
 * Talk:Surrealism - what is the importance of Keith Wigdor (what is Surrealism 2003?), Daniel C.Boyer (does Daniel have too many articles posted in Surrealism and its related pages as a vested self-interest), Evi Moechel(Zazie, is she a cyberartist or surrealist?),Eric W.Bragg (is Eric a surrealist poet?),Franklin and Penelope Rosemont (did they meet Andre Breton as they allege and where is the proof of that meeting?) to surrealism;
 * Talk:Christian cross - on dispute about the origin of Christian cross
 * Talk:Iran - dispute on whether Iran's alleged ties with terrorism in the 1980s should be included in Iran's history.
 * Talk:Communism - dispute on whether a certain negative quote by Reagan should be included. A more general question is whether it is appropriate to include heavily opinionated quotes by extreme opponents (or proponents) of something on controversial pages.
 * Talk:Allah - dispute over Allah in relation to Judaism and other religions.
 * Talk: Gay bathhouse - dispute over NPOV.
 * Talk:Elagabalus - Dispute about whether Elagabalus was transsexual.
 * Talk:Retributive justice - Dispute over accuracy of article (it appears to be rather confused as to what exactly constitutes Retributive Justice).
 * Talk:Dido - A NPOV/factual dispute as to whether a reconstruction of Dido's life "based on new studies" should appear in the article.
 * Talk:Pikey. (particularly FAO British contributors) This currently read like a tabloid article. It needs serious NPOV attention or a complete rewrite.
 * Talk:List of Pantheists - two users are in serious disagreement and on the verge of an edit war about whether this list should contain self-identified pantheists, those that have been called pantheist by others at some point, or something in between.
 * Talk:Erika Steinbach - classical edit war/reversion war over whether the POV of the revanchist organisation Steinbach heads merits mentioning, and then how to combine this with the point of view of Polish nationalists at the other end of this RL-conflict
 * Talk:Coca-Cola - Should Pepsi/the stock ticker be mentioned in the opening paragraph? Should there be an overview of Coke's medical controversies in the opening paragraph?
 * Talk:The Lord of the Rings - whether or not the article The Lord of the Rings should be added to the Category:Birmingham, England. (Consensus was not to add the article to the category)
 * Talk:Kingdom of Israel: Dispute over whether to include Hebrew transliterations of the names as they are known to English speakers. (Resolved that the article can contain both the well-known Biblical names and transliteration of the Hebrew.)
 * Talk:Winny - potential edit war/NPOV dispute on the addition of subjective content ("poor imitation"), unverified/unverifiable content (Kaneko's intents) and verifiably false content (The nonexistence of a P2P developer in Japan that faced litigation prior to Kaneko) presented as fact, and the removal of a paragraph of verifiable content (Kaneko's support fund) and NPOV/Accuracy dispute markers.
 * Talk:Democratic Underground - on how to phrase/present left-wing criticisms of the site
 * Talk:Transwoman The part on sexual orientation is disputed, the links that are supposed to prove one point of view actually don't when read by the other side. (Or vice verca.)
 * Talk:Transylvania - edit war over the text to accompany a link to a (slightly) related article. Communication attempts on talk page largely failed.
 * Talk:Anti-French sentiment in the United States. Repeated need to add loaded POV terminology to the first paragraph.
 * Talk:Local Church controversy and Talk:Local churches. Articles have schismed due to falure to compromise, talk pages are still a mess, POV/original research edits are getting put in left and right... this is a chronic and messy edit war, and there's no end in sight.
 * Talk:Schnorrer - Edit war between two users that refuse to compromise on the inclusion of Karl Schnörrer. Ongoing poll to determine article content.
 * Talk:Computer software - Edit war between two users who have differing understanding of the definition of software.
 * Talk:Brussels - Dispute over discrimination of linguistic communities in and around Brussels.
 * Talk:Liancourt Rocks - Dispute on whether alternate name "East Sea of Korea" should be included in article.
 * Talk:Janez Drnovsek (for both Milan Kucan and Janez Drnovsek) - dispute whether information about the two Slovenian political leaders being sued for alleged war crimes by some Serbian political parties should be included.
 * Talk:Central Asia and MediaWiki talk:Central Asia - inclusion of Mongolia
 * Talk:Kosovo and Metohia - issue of whether the article should be under another name
 * Talk:East Asia and MediaWiki talk:East Asia - inclusion of Vietnam
 * Talk:Jerusalem - Is Jerusalem the capital of Israel, and should this be stated in the first paragraph of the article?
 * Talk:Traditional Chinese medicine - Dispute over what is vandalism, and how much this article should accomodate persistent vandalism. Comment requested on reverting to a pre-vandalism version.
 * Talk:Papua_(disambiguation) and Talk:Papua (Indonesia) - reversion war. One user insists the common English name of "West Papua" is not seen.
 * Talk:Oil for food - A long edit war. One user insistant that there be a 4:1 ratio of corruption allegations to description of the program itself; two users insistant that as long as the allegations are uninvestigated, that this is completely unreasonable.
 * Talk:Che Guevara - "Cold" edit war that doesn't need to get hot.
 * Talk:Peter Lynds - Dispute about description of Lynds (eg. comparison to Einstein) and whether the allegation about Lynds producing the press release himself should be mentioned.
 * Talk:Heteronormativity - Dispute over significance, use of the term, and addition of boxes relating to LGBT and critical theory.
 * Talk:Gay sex - has been redirect more than once, also a candidate for deletion, as is Different-sex sexual practices. See also: Sexual orientation, homosexuality, same-sex marriage, Causes of sexual orientation, Slogan:No one chooses to be gay, Slogan:Homosexuality is a choice, pretty much anything involved with homosexuality, gayness, and straightness. There is dispute over both article titles and content, however there is a newly created: Naming_conventions. Some users prefer queer, some gay/lesbian/bisexual, some same-sex and different-sex.
 * Talk:Khmer Rouge - One user disputing the number dead and the qualitative descriptions of the Khmer Rouge.
 * Talk:Expulsion of Germans after World War II - there is a long drawn out dispute on a lot of pages concerning common German-Polish history.
 * Talk:Islamic views of homosexuality - Speculation about gay marriage in Islam
 * Talk:New Imperialism - Participants not addressing issue of how to merge two competing versions.
 * Talk:Andreas Schlüter - Revert war over whether to say Schluter was born in Danzig, or Danzig (Gdansk).
 * Talk:St. Louis Blues - Should the new St. Louis Blues (hockey) be moved back to original St. Louis Blues for consistency and fairness with all National Hockey League teams?
 * Talk:Genital mutilation - debate over whether the word "mutilation" can be used neutrally and whether the page should be at Genital mutilation or Genital modification. Talk is at Talk:Genital modification due to a problem during a page move.
 * Talk:David Rohl - Discussion of some disputed Egyptological theories.
 * Talk:Cycle - Whether to call the article cycle or cycles. Also, whether a large section of links is appropriate.
 * Resolved that the article is named "cycles". [[User:Poccil|Peter O. (Talk)]] 18:07, Aug 25, 2004 (UTC)
 * Talk:George W. Bush, also at Talk:John Kerry. Anti-Bush editors are relentlessly making small edits (many anonymously) to keep the article negative POV, especially as compared to Kerry article. Please review articles and comments in Talk for the issues.
 * Talk:Al Gore - extensive paraphrasing and borrowing from Gore campaign materials.
 * Talk:Scientific skepticism - presentation of critical views on scientific skepticism.
 * Apparently resolved; inactive since May 11, 2004. [[User:Poccil|Peter O. (Talk)]] 00:31, Aug 14, 2004 (UTC)
 * Talk:Tibet - how should this be split or be split at all?
 * Talk:Patch_(computing) - the current version seems unclear and unfocused, currently being rewritten.
 * Apparently resolved; inactive since March 27, 2004. [[User:Poccil|Peter O. (Talk)]] 00:48, Aug 14, 2004 (UTC)
 * Talk:Subject-object problem - User:24.45.99.191 (Paul Vogel) is edit warring over the inclusion of some content in the first paragraph. Attempts at a compromise have been made and rejected by him. Discussion is proving extremely difficult.
 * Talk: Atlantium - are the phrases "pretends to be a sovereign state" and "George Francis Cruickshank plays the role of head of state" POV?
 * Talk:Neoconservatism (United States) - attempt to avoid an edit war with anon user on (1) whether it is appropriate to keep "pro-war" in the lead paragraph and (2) disagreement about how this anon user describes April Glaspie's interaction with Saddam Hussein (presumably referring to the July 25, 1990 interview)
 * Talk: One thousand seven hundred twenty-nine - Are all numbers interesting? Is this a paradox?  Also question on page split.
 * Talk:Viking - On etymology: Whether we should follow the dictionary or someone's personal theories.
 * Talk:Compendium - Usefulness of this article is questioned.
 * Inactive since March 6. [[User:Poccil|Peter O. (Talk)]] 18:12, Aug 25, 2004 (UTC)
 * Talk:Full English breakfast, Talk:Traditional fry-up - Irish breakfast article removed+redired to Full English breakfast (not appropriate). Author wants to combine articles. Attempt then made to combine under Traditional fry-up but was reverted again.
 * Talk:List of concentration camps for Poles, List of Soviet Union prison sites that detained Poles - discussion of what titles to use for pages of this type.
 * Talk:John Edwards - Whether to wikify and create pages for Edwards' parents.
 * Talk:Ambition (card game) - written by the game creator, potential self-promotion Full discussion history: Talk:Ambition/Delete Talk:Ambition (card game) Talk:Church's Criterion.
 * Talk:WWJD - how to present variations and parodies of the phrase.
 * Talk:Daniel Wright - dispute consists of one dynamic anonymous IP using guerilla warfare to get this page deleted even though consensus on VfD is to keep, and everyone else with far better things to do than to keep reverting the general vandalism and abuse posted by this user.
 * Talk:War - comment "War does not determine who is Right, Only who is Left!" destroyed on page and talk without any argumentation.
 * Talk:Microsoft antitrust case - needs a little NPOVing
 * Talk:List of recipes/Delete - Should pages that are nothing more than recipes be moved to our sister project Wikibooks and deleted here or not.
 * Talk:Augusto Pinochet - debate over which picture of the man we should use.
 * Talk:Sant Cassia general dispute over content in the latter article, has been reverted and changed many times. Any input is welcome on the pages talk area.
 * Talk:German Air Ministry aircraft designation system dispute between Adam Carr, Rlandmann, and other participants over use of a German word (or its acronym) in article titles.
 * Talk: Micronation - Dispute between Wik and Gene Poole over whether Atlantia is a Micronation. Although the two are constantly reverting, the page has been protected and the situation isn't that urgent, but I would appreciate viewpoints nonetheless.
 * Talk:Anti-Semitism (abuse) Edit-warring regarding a section of the Anti-Semitism article alleging "abuse of the term Anti-Semitism"
 * Talk:Violence in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict 2004. Edit-warring, and now a vote, over whether the set of pages should be one timeline of Israeli and Palestinian violence, or multiple timelines (Palestinian terrorism against Israel, Israeli military operations that resulted in Palestinian deaths, etc.).
 * Talk:Alexander Lukashenko - A version conflict between 172 and Adam Carr. Please look at the different versions and comment.
 * Talk:atheism G vrs. g spelling of "God" primary problem. Various other minor disputes over citations (validity of the term "weak" atheism, accurate count of atheists worldwide) as well as NPOV. has become very heated at times.
 * Seems resolved to me, thanx to eloquence, and I put it here so... Sam Spade 10:00, 23 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * talk:agnosticism similar to atheism, with G vrs. g but there is also a dispute over "logic of agnosticism" portion. Many participants the same as in atheism.
 * Same as above, nice to see what good a little time (and a good editor like eloquence) can do. Sam Spade 02:16, 25 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * Talk:Prem Rawat - dispute over this guru's involvement in the Divine Light Mission. Extreme POV when discussing the ex-followers as if they are a hate group without allowing a discussion in the main article why they oppose the guru so much.
 * Not fully resolved, but the extreme POV has gone. It continues to be a very problematic article. One non-Wikipedians will issue a justified warning on his website because of he sees as "cult revisionism".

I think it's bad to write such articles. Shame