text:
User talk:Jgritz

Again, welcome! - UtherSRG 14:10, 28 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Hello,

Nice additions to George Augustus Robinson. Just curious though, did you contact the State Library for permission to use the photo? I'm asking not so much because I'm trying to police copyright violations, but more because there are some other images in the library that would be nice to use.Bkonrad 15:10, 28 Feb 2004 (UTC)

I would think the 50+ rule would apply, but copyright law is taking strange turns in the digital age. I mean, the library could conceivably consider the scanned version of the photos as a separate publication of the image. Or they could be considered to be under crown copyright, which I no even less about than U.S. copyright. If you find anything out from the State Library, let me know--`cause that would be a great resource. Bkonrad 16:15, 28 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Caught me red handed
The temptation was too great! I was looking at the "famous cricketers" from Tasmania and remembered that, in an article I edited for David Hookes, William Kirkman had figures of 29-0-164-1 at Adelaide in 1987 when David Hookes made 306* and Wayne Phillips 213*. I put it in as a joke for myself for no other reason. I never do this - I have no idea why! --One Salient Oversight 03:35, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)

I suppose so
From Jgritz' comment on PA Massacre edit: (one link is enough for the terrifying truth :)). Well I guess so... a global conspiracy to disarm the citizens by the UN that shoots random cafes to achieve their aims?  You have to admit, it's pretty entertaining.  Heh heh. --Dr Strangelove

Image:Tasmanian devil.jpg
This photo is being moved to WikiCommons. Also, the GFDL is a non-revokable license and nobody, including you, can change the license from GFDL to something else, e.g. All rights reserved or public domain. Thuresson 14:16, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)

 * Sorry if I was a bit short. Since you are the photographer you are obviously free to sell it to anybody under any license for any price but the copy of it on Wikipedia will always be GFDL. Thuresson 09:10, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Holy Sepulchre
Thanks for adding those photos! They add a lot to the article. When were you there? Csernica 21:34, 14 May 2005 (UTC)

Australian Greens
I wish I'd had the sense to make the leadership bit a note; I didn't want to put the full explanation in the box, and the anon didn't seem to be capable of reading the explanation in the rest of the article. Thanks for that :-) --Calair 23:32, 22 May 2005 (UTC)

Don't you understand that that link is highly relevant to the greens, not Family First? Are you able to comprehend that all major Australian political parties have links to critisism on their article except, now thanx to you, the Greens? Or are to just trying to push your POV by removing all dissent? Xtra 23:43, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

 * NPOV - I note the comment you left when removing the POV dispute template. It's not that I am shy, I would go ahead and edit the article if I thought it was my business to do so.  What I would have preferred is for the person who wrote the non-neutral text to stop and take a dispassionate look at it.  The alternative is that I make edits and others come along and get offended that their work is altered.  Such would be impolite. Darcyj 15:37, 27 August 2005 (UTC)

West Coast Range
You marked West Coast Range for speedy deletion with the reason "Very ambigous name - could be put within existing article about tasmania". This is not a valid reason for speedy deletion. Please acquaint yourself with the criteria for speedy deletion before you mark articles for speedy deletion in the future. Thank you.

If you feel the name of an article is incorrect, be bold and move it. If you feel that one article should be merged into another, be bold and merge it, and replace the original with a redirect. Kelly Martin 08:43, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)

And my resource not commercia l!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You are not right, why you do not delete www.israelimages.com ? And you yes delete my site www.wildlife-photo.org ? I all shall equally put it!!! As my photos about Israel! And my resource not commercial!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 * It is your personal site. Please don't put links to your personal site on wikipedia. Put them on your talk page if anywhere. Jgritz 30 June 2005 07:57 (UTC)
 * Not only is it his personal site, but it is commercial; it has a tab for ordering prints. Jayjg (talk) 30 June 2005 16:26 (UTC)

NOT COMERSHINAL !!!
if you dont now wath is it proffesinal photography, the your only problem !!! my site is not comersinal look at my enqupment is 20.000$ and yes i sell my works so all many go to enqupment only !!! i Israeli Jew photographer and you not from israel, i help my contry and fraydme, be coz a pipele look to my butefel cuntry and come to hear !!!!!!!!!! if you dont see wath a MODERATOR PUT my link it is your problem !!! more my images i give for peaple for free !!!!!!!!!!!! for reserch and for all wath can help my country !!! if you have lose my link a i will put them !!!GET OUT FROM MY COUNTRY PHOTOGRAPHY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Photographer
You could gently direct the guy (?) to the Wikimedia Commons and suggest he contribute there. Have you pointed him to the external links policy? - Mgm|(talk) July 2, 2005 15:23 (UTC)

 * Have pointed him to the commons, and left links to What_Wikipedia_is_not. I think that's why this is bugging me so much - there's a fundamental misunderstanding of what this site is. He seems to think it is like http://dmoz.org/ and that it his right to have his site here. This link should be here based on its encyclopedic value. I didn't put the Israel article on my watch list because I wanted to find photos. I put it there because I want to learn more through reading about the place. Jgritz 2 July 2005 15:35 (UTC)

It's not clear to me what else can be done at this point. Jayjg (talk) 3 July 2005 03:26 (UTC)

I'd like to note that blocking his IPs is futile, they are dynamically allocated by his ISP (Bezeq International). He gets a new IP everytime he connects to the internet and you are blocking IPs that may be used by other clients of Bezeq International.--Doron 7 July 2005 09:17 (UTC)

 * Re West Coast entries. Ok I may put some extra lines, but when you get blocks of text like in the MHPS - my understanding from wiki based info was that to be broken up with headings was better than that.  Best Wishesvcxlor 6 July 2005 08:50 (UTC)

Tasmanian categories: please use only the most specific
hi, please be careful to keep only the most specific categories for articles in a vertical dimension, e.g. List of Tasmanians needs to only be in category:People of Tasmania, but not also in category:Tasmania (because the former is already a subcategory of the latter), see Categorization. thanks. clarkk 6 July 2005 10:20 (UTC)

 * no problem. the basic idea is to be frugal in the "vertical" dimension (i.e. keep in the most specific "lowest" sub-category) but be generous in the "horizontal" dimension (e.g. category:History of Tasmania is under category:History of Australia and category:Tasmania).  of course the category system doesn't form a strict hierarchy or tree, so there are exceptions, but it makes it cleaner if we stick to a tree-like hierarchy and only deviate from it for a good reason.  clarkk 6 July 2005 10:50 (UTC)

Good work
I just wanted to commend your efforts in reverting vandals. Jayjg (talk) 7 July 2005 16:44 (UTC)

Banteay Srei
Nice picture of Banteay Srei- I'm finally writing an article to go with it. The picture looks to me like the south (on the left) and central towers- do you remember if that's right? Thanks, Mark1 05:04, 17 August 2005 (UTC)

David Boon photo
Hello, Jgritz. I'm trying to check the source and copyright status of all the cricket pictures. Your picture of David Boon doesn't seem to have a source, so I'm wondering where you got it from. Thanks very much for any info. Stephen Turner 11:48, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

 * OK, thanks very much for your reply. I'll list it as "no source" and it will get deleted in due course. Stephen Turner 11:08, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

G'day/Mountains of Tassie etc
G'day, hope you've checked out the wet coat range recently! I agree with your removal of the link to the mountain commercial mob in tassie entry - but am simply short of the coke bottle to really start a 'outdoor/mountaineering and commerce/tourism' entry for tassie, and wonder what you think of one of them for such things as the large numbers of businesses that gear themselves up as outdoor tourism ventures.. interestingly enough i see no one has ventured into doing the south west tas region art yet. seeyavcxlor 03:45, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

Yup
All entries relating to the hydro read like commercials. Thanks for improving the encyclopediac standard on lake pedder!! well donevcxlor 13:19, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

The connection between the Jewish-Arab conflict in the days of Muhammad to the Arab-Israeli conflict
If you don't know what is the connection between the Jewish-Arab conflict in the days of Muhammad to the Arab-Israeli conflict, read the article Jewish-Arab conflict, especially this section. Toya 11:47, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

Lecture critique?
I saw that you removed my addition to Outsourcing. I added a comment about it. As I mentioned, I'm an author, not a consultant. Was there something specific in that lecture which you thought did not belong? My coauthor and I would appreciate any feedback that you have -- if there's something factually incorrect in it, we'll ask our publisher, O'Reilly, to publish an errata and we'll post it on the companion website for our book.

Un-notable film?
Have you seen the film? Mike Gordon is a rock star and his work should be up here. Aren't you supposed to put a warning up first before you delete something? I am going to put it back up because I know it is notable. Check Phish's website and look for the film there. You may learn something.

Yes the film may be minor, but doesn't the creator have any weight to it? There are too many instances I can think of where a product of an artist may not be the greatest, in some people's opinions, but the work is still refrenced. Just because imdb doesn't have a review of it, did you look at the site above like I asked you to? Daviddec 05:42, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

Check out this one too. outside out Daviddec 05:53, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

...and? A bad flash movie don't maketh an article. Jgritz 05:55, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

I was hoping you'd say something like that. Did you take a lesson? Daviddec 06:27, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

 * The only lesson I've had today is what I've been told about Phishheads is true. Jgritz 06:45, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

what's that? Daviddec 09:15, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

Rising Low
You should remove the flag on the Rising Low article. This movie, as well as Outside Out, fit the criteria to be submitted as an article. They both have been awarded honors at prestigious cinema festivals. Also try not to attack me personally. The rules say that's wrong. 'Article added by repeat creator of rubbish articles, and general trouble maker.' Thanks again for answering my previous question. Daviddec 12:20, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

 * You do add rubbish content. For example, your user page. Pretty classy stuff. How come these prestigious film festivals don't have articles? And your contributions of today show all the hallmarks of a troll. So it ain't personal, its just a rational observation of someone who obviously doesn't "get it" and who should probably be off chatting about what type of bass strings Mike Gordon uses on the Phish forums. Goodbye.  Jgritz 12:48, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

Is this proof of notibility? http://www.newportfilmfestival.com/2005/awards.asp  i'd also like to thank you for judging me based on my wiki history. That makes sooo much sense and is perfectly logical. 'Cause people never change or act trivial or do things for the hell of it and 'cause life is very serious and needs negativity and less is good all the time. Before suggesting that I don't 'got it' we should both examine what Kerouac said about 'it'. Daviddec 16:32, 25 December 2005 (UTC)

"I had nothing to offer anybody except my own confusion" (JK) - Is that "it". Jgritz 00:07, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

Stop foreignizing the world
When you foreigners get the intelligence to develop a technology that the world uses, you can begin to impose your foreign spellings on us. Until then, when you are dealing with American technology, on American web sites, you should use modern American words. Wikipedia is an American web site hosted in America, and C# is an American technology, developed by Microsoft, an American company.

You have a very open mind, and I wish there were more people with your insight. Keep up the good work! Jgritz 22:51, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

 * btw. foreignizing is not a real word, American or not (foreignising). Also, you may want to read this - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#National_varieties_of_English

Personal/commercial
Well, all the other links on the article in question are also commercial links. Thus your argument did not make sense. However, I finally understood why my edit was wiped out - i.e. the page I entered was under construction. - Greetings - JamLovers

Personal/commercial 2
May I ask why was my non-commercial link deleted, which also had some relevancy to the topic, unlike some of the commercial links already up there? The page I linked to was not even under construction... Thx. Camenzind

First you complain about my maps being commercial, then when you find out that they are not, you are criticizing the quality of them, which is questionable especially if you praise the ones from cia. But that's a matter of taste, so no problem. However, I would kindly like to ask why do not you remove all of the commercial links from the given page, I could mention a few: http://www.countymapsusa.com/ http://www.mediatico.com/en/ http://www.united-states-map.com/ - does not even work Or in other words, if these links are appropriate, why is mine not. Thx for your time.

Notability
I strongly disagree with your current edit of Notable Tasmanians, I will refrain from anything at this point, but alert to you that unless I see some _very _good _reasoning on the talk page, I will be reverting some of them in the new year. Apart from that I trust you had a good christmas, and hope to enjoy our banter again in the new year!vcxlor 09:54, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for the photography edit
I left it a bit ugly to invite some cleanup. I liked your edits. Interesting subject, actually, the physics of resolution. The Bayer article and the moire articles we fortunately already extant. A graph of price vs time would be a nice addition. Steve Kd4ttc

Notablility/etc blah
I do hope you dont take it personally, but I still disagree with your comments re Tas People - but wont let that get in the way! I will let the Chris Koch article be a lesson in itself - you said it was a red link - take it out, and there when I start it - he's an OA, 2 x major award winner, books about tas, as well as the Year of...  There are other tasmanians who have similar situations - they simply havent had arts about them yet! And they will get on the list, and it will stay! Yes?

As for richard, I was not focusing on the drama issue (god could I tell you a story or two about the puppet people of hobart of years ago!!)  - but the book - and a lot of the issues that arise out of that, but to do that art - another couple of months again!. You may well take him off the list if you wish, but that dosnt decrease other issues relative to an expanded article.

Best wishes, looking forward to another speedy deletion or other issue to have fun with you about   :)  SatuSuro 07:05, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

 * Don't worry. Not taking it personally! I should really read Davey's book. Anyway, leave the list as it is. Suppose I'm worried, because once these list articles start they seem to be a magnet for everyman, his dog and their reality TV star friends. --Jgritz 07:50, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

 * :) That indeed my friend is when we jump!

With the hope we don't get the bloody happy birthday jimbo wales guy ripping through our tassie arts, thats when we call in the kelly martins (or is that howitzers!) anyways, ive had so few signs of vandals/trolls/etc/edits/intrusions on my west coast arts, I sort of cruise through them in disbelief! best wishes SatuSuro 08:14, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

Cricketer photos
Thanks for the great photos of Brett Lee and Damien Martyn! Stephen Turner (Talk) 09:57, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

afd .. pina
yeah, if you look at 69.122.182.198 and read through, she's no interest in protocol and appears to have been user katherinejohnson and seems to be wiki guerilla but not the happy birthday jimbo wales dimensions!! SatuSuro 09:52, 20 January 2006 (UTC) yup I've let ambi and duncharis know as well, but when I get in and see some of the other stuff, it's enough to want to retreat to the west coast mountains for a while - in every sense! Thanks for your response! 10:19, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

But look at how she has a complete disregard for Wikipedia policy--blah blah--there is a reason, disrespect only breeds more disrespect. Isn't that right fellas?

re: Hip Forums
From looking at your edits earlier, I was hoping this was some sort of mistake! Was also considering that your account had been hacked, as you do have a good record of cleaning up after the vandals. In light of the update, being rid of the vandal warning is perfectly fine with me, keep up the good work! xaosflux Talk  / CVU  17:12, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

 * I wonder if it is possible that you somehow reverted to the version that was created by this edit. --JWSchmidt 21:09, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

Your note at a college anon vandal page
Over at User talk:212.219.116.130 you've posted:
 * User from Havering Sixth Form College, Essex. Can send email to P McConalogue if vandalism continues. --Jgritz 09:53, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

Well, they've got more vandalism done again after the unblocking — see, , and. What exactly am I supposed to do now? Can you please notify this P McConalogue as you haven't posted their email? I'll revert meanwhile. --BACbKA 20:55, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

63.209.135.130 spamming Professional employer organization
You and I have been in an ongoing revert cycle with this anonymous individual, despite pleas we've left on User talk:63.209.135.130. I've not dealt with this kind of thing before -- do you know the appropriate way to escalate this? --ScottMainwaring 23:19, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

Image:Holy sepulchre exterior.jpg
This is to let you know that I have uploaded Image:Holy sepulchre ladder.jpg, which is a slightly enlarged detail of your photo above. I have linked back to the original in the image description, and asked that you be credited by anyone who uses it. TCC (talk) (contribs) 23:39, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

Reminder...
When using template tags on talk pages, don't forget to substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use {{subst:test}} instead of {{test}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template. — Ian Manka Talk to me‼ 21:27, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Golgota hills in "Sitios maravillosos de la tierra"
Mister McLean, I am doing an article in my own blogger in Spanish "Sitios maravillosos de la tierra" and I have used one of your works - "Golgota hills" -. I would like to know your opinion about. You can look at it in "Sitios maravillosos de la tierra" (Wonders of the earth). If you consider that your work must not be there under any circunstance, let me know and immediatly I will remove it from there. I work now in Cambodia, but I am from Colombia. Also I am a traveller and I admire your work. User:Elviajeropaisa

Image:Holy sepulchre exterior.jpg
Hello, I have place this image on Wikimedia Commons, so now other projects can used it. I hope that this is ok, the license is the same and you are credited, see. Thank you, --JLCA 22:43, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of places in Jerusalem
Hi Jgritz: You created List of places in Jerusalem, please see Articles for deletion/List of places in Jerusalem, someone there has nominated this for deletion. IZAK 10:37, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Devil photo
Hi, I thought you might be interested to see the Australia Bureau of Statistics is using your devil photo on their website, see this. No attribution is given. --Peta 03:08, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:0721demo05.jpg
I see that you uploaded this photo and provided a link to the source. The link doesn't currently point to the image in question. Looking around on that site I was not able to find license info and I was wondering how you know it's licensed under the GFDL. In fact this site seems to solicit contributions, so the 'source' (the copyright holder) may not be affiliated with that site and may not want it licensed under the GFDL. Seeking clarification. Mkultra72 15:43, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Agreed - This was one of the first things I uploaded when I was a newbie to GNU and wikipedia, so I have tagged it incorrectly. I'll see what I can do to change this Jgritz 09:50, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Devil.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Devil.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 11:41, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Nice pic at DYK
Look! Your Image:Gordon dam.jpg is appearing on the main page! Nice pic! --74.13.124.69 (talk) 18:01, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

You've got mail
Sent you an email regarding one of your photos. --OliverH (talk) 22:28, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Derwent.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Derwent.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:38, 8 January 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 07:38, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

File:NoDamsTriangle.jpg needs authorship information.
Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:NoDamsTriangle.jpg appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided),authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).

 * If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which: will produce an appropriate expansion, or use the own template.

 * If this is an old image, for which the authorship is unknown or impossible to determine, please indicate this on the file description page.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:41, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Non-free use of File:Rock island bend.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Rock island bend.jpg. However, there is a concern that the use of the image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. Details of this problem, and which specific criteria that the image may not meet, can be obtained by going to the image description page. If you feel that this image does meet those criteria, please place a note on the image description or talk page explaining why. Do not remove the di-fails NFCC tag itself.

An administrator will review this file within a few days, and having considered the opinions placed on the image page, may delete it in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion or remove the tag entirely. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Moe   ε  01:33, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Use of your Jerusalem photo
Hello Wayne,

I have used a cropped version of your Jerusalem photo (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3AJerusalem_from_mt_olives.jpg) to illustrate an article about an upcoming Elvis Presley themed Isreal sightseeing trip in the news blog of the German Elvis Presley Society. I have linked to the respective Wikimedia photo page, you are credited by name at the end of the article and in the photo caption of the full size view. Have a look: http://www.epg-ev.de/News_reader/items/elvis-reise-durch-das-heilige-land.html

Most of the news items in the blog also end up in the printed magazine of the society named "Graceland" which is issued six times per year. So it is very likely that your photo will be used in the next magazine as well, if you allow, which will come out some time in June. The editors have the final say, though, dependent on the space that is availabe on that page. If it is printed, your photo will be credited with your name and I would be very happy to send you a copy in the mail once I get my copies of the magazine.

Have a great day,

Thomas R Machnitzki (User:doxTxob)

Thank You for the Wikipedia Picture
Hello, My name is Duane Hurst and I recently made a free (non-commercial) English web site to share information with people. I added links to your Wikipedia/Wikimedia freeware picture (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Tasmanian_Devil_resting.jpg). I also gave credit to you on my web pages for your work. Thank you for sharing with the public. My website is:

http://www.freeenglishsite.com/

I add pictures such as yours to one of the following major sections of my site: 1. World section - contains information and over 10,000 images of every world country and territory. Link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/world/index.htm

2. USA section - contains information and images of every USA state and territory. Link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/world/usa/index.htm

3. English section - "Mel and Wes" lessons in conversation format. Stories are located in various USA states and world countries such as China, England, Germany, Japan, Mexico and Thailand. Each lesson has many slang terms and idioms, which I link to my Slang Dictionary. This eventually will have over 5,000 terms. Currently, it has about 3,000 slang and idioms. I regularly add new lessons and slang terms. Link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/english/lessons/index.htm Slang Dictionary link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/english/slang/Eslang_a.htm

Prior to retirement, I taught English at several private and public universities in the United States.

Please share this free site with your friends. I hope all will enjoy the pictures and find the English information useful. Sincerely, Duane Hurst in Utah, USA

Email address: duanerhurst@freeenglishsite.com --65.130.202.239 (talk) 00:48, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Hobart meetup
Hello! This is a message to inform you of a Wikipedia Hobart meetup which will be held on 10 January. New and experienced editors are welcome! Please check the meetup page for more information. This message has been sent to members of Category:Wikipedians in Tasmania by Chuq (talk) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:19, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Hobart area articles
Hello, in advance of a possible project in the Hobart area, we're looking to identify and improve a specific range of articles, mainly those associated with locations in the Hobart City Council region. If you'd like to find out more, please join in the discussion at WikiProject Tasmania, or check out the list of articles at QR list. If you'd prefer to not receive these notifications in the future, please let me know.

This message has been sent to members of Category:Wikipedians in Tasmania, Category:Wikipedians in Hobart, and WikiProject Tasmania participants by Chuq (talk) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:05, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

title: User talk:Jgritz


text:
Shire of Mansfield

The Shire of Mansfield is a local government area in the Hume region of Victoria, Australia, located in the north-east part of the state. It covers an area of 3844 km2 and in August 2021, had a population of 10,178.

It includes the towns of Mansfield, Maindample, Mount Buller, Bonnie Doon, Jamieson, Kevington, Merrijig, Tolmie and Woods Point. It was formed in 2002 from the de-amalgamation of the Shire of Delatite into the current shire and the Rural City of Benalla.

The de-amalgamation was the only successful de-amalgamation following the Kennett Government's policy of local government mergers. It was the result of organised political activity, with parallels to other autonomy movements.

The Shire is governed and administered by Mansfield Shire Council; its seat of local government and administrative centre is located at the council headquarters in Mansfield. The Shire is named after the main urban settlement located in the north of the LGA, that is Mansfield, which is also the LGA's most populous urban centre with a population of 4,360.

The Shire is bordered by the Rural City of Benalla, the Shire of Baw Baw, the Shire of Murrindindi, the Shire of Yarra Ranges, the Shire of Strathbogie and the Shire of Wellington. There are two unincorporated areas within the shire; the areas around Mount Buller and Mount Stirling.

Current composition
The Shire has an unsubdivided structure, with five councillors elected to represent the community across the shire.

Administration and governance
The council meets in the council chambers at the council headquarters in the Mansfield Municipal Offices, which is also the location of the council's administrative activities. It also provides customer services at its administrative centre in Mansfield.

Townships and localities
According to the 2021 census, the shire had a population of 10,178, compared to 8,584 in the 2016 census.

^ - Territory divided with another LGA * - Not noted in 2016 Census

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Shire of Mansfield


text:
User talk:48chelseylo

Welcome
Hello, welcome to Wikipedia.

You might find these links helpful in creating new pages or helping with the above tasks: How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Naming conventions, Manual of Style. You should read our policies at some point too.

If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

 * If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.

 * You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: . If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.

 * If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.

 * Before saving a page, it's a good idea to use the Show Preview button to review your edits.

Again, welcome! - UtherSRG 14:11, 28 Feb 2004 (UTC)

title: User talk:48chelseylo


text:
United Tasmania Group

The United Tasmania Group (UTG) is generally acknowledged as the world's first Green party to contest elections. The party was formed on 23 March 1972, during a meeting of the Lake Pedder Action Committee (LPAC) at the Hobart Town Hall in order to field political candidates in the April 1972 state election.

1970s
UTG contested ten state and federal elections between 1972 and 1977, with the highest vote of 9.9% in the Legislative Council election with Rod Broadby in 1975 (see Appendix 4, UTG Journal Issue No. 6, 2021).

The United Tasmania Group's first President was Dr Richard Jones and it lasted for five years, briefly reforming in 1990 for the federal election. A few of the 1970s candidates, including Bob Brown, went on to form the Tasmanian Greens and then ultimately, at the national level, the Australian Greens.

2010s
On 2 April 2016 following a meeting, former members of the party re-started the group.

The United Tasmania Group launched The UTG Journal in 2018. The journal is designed to cover a wide range of topics, including the development of conservation and other issues since that original founding date in April, 1972. Nine issues of The UTG Journal have been published since the re-start of the organisation in 2016.

Histories and analysis
In the mid 1990s Lance Armstrong wrote a history of the politics of Tasmania in the 1990s. In the mid-2000s author Bill Lines also attempted to grapple with the broader scope of politics in Australia relative to greens politics in Patriots. Meanwhile the 2017 Master's Thesis of Canadian scholar Blake Allen produced an analysis of how the UTG, and their effect on Tasmanian politics, reshaped the Australian federal relationship in a favorable manner for successive national governments. In the late 2010s Paddy Manning researched and wrote a history of the Greens in Australia, and included the UTG in the first chapter, acknowledging the importance of the group within the larger context.

An unpublished Honours Thesis on the party by Pam Walker (University of Tasmania) was written in 1986, and the first chapter in Paddy Manning's book, Inside the Greens (2019), is devoted to the history of the party.

2000s

 * The UTG Journal issue No. 1
 * The UTG Journal Issue No. 2
 * The UTG Journal Issue No. 3
 * The UTG Journal Issue No. 4
 * The UTG Journal Issue No. 5
 * The UNITED TASMANIA GROUP Story Policy Compilation The UTG Journal Issue No. 6 Special 50th year edition
 * The UTG Journal Issue No. 7
 * The UTG Journal Issue No. 8
 * The UTG Journal Issue No. 9

title: United Tasmania Group


text:
Electrolux

Electrolux AB is a Swedish multinational home appliance manufacturer, headquartered in Stockholm. It is consistently ranked the world's second largest appliance maker by units sold, after Whirlpool.

Electrolux products sell under a variety of brand names (including its own), and are primarily major appliances and vacuum cleaners intended for home consumer use. Electrolux has a primary listing on the Stockholm Stock Exchange and is a constituent of the OMX Stockholm 30 index.

History
The company originates from a merger of two companies—Lux AB and Svenska Elektron AB, the former an established manufacturer and the latter a younger company founded by a former vacuum salesman who had also been an employee of the former firm. The origins of Electrolux are closely tied to the vacuum, but today it also makes major appliances.

Electrolux made an initial public offering on the London Stock Exchange in 1928 (it was delisted in 2010) and another on the Stockholm Stock Exchange in 1930.

its shares trade on the NASDAQ OMX Nordic Market and over-the-counter. Electrolux is an OMX Nordic 40 constituent stock.

Sales company to major manufacturer
In 1919, a Svenska Elektron AB acquisition, Elektromekaniska AB, became Elektrolux (the spelling was changed to Electrolux in 1957). It initially sold Lux branded vacuum cleaners in several European countries.

In 1923, the company acquired AB Arctic and subsequently added absorption refrigerators to its product line. Other appliances soon followed, including washing machines in 1951, dishwashers in 1959, and food service equipment in 1962.

Mergers and acquisitions
The company has often and regularly expanded through mergers and acquisitions.

While Electrolux had bought several companies before the 1960s, that decade saw the beginnings of a new wave of M&A activity. The company bought ElektroHelios, Norwegian Elektra, Danish Atlas, Finnish Slev, and Flymo, et al., in the nine years from 1960 to 1969. It sold its American subsidiary to Consolidated Foods and exited the American market in 1968, only returning in 1974 when Electrolux acquired Eureka-Williams from National Union, one of the oldest names in the vacuum cleaner industry. Electrolux sold its vacuum cleaners using the Eureka brand name in North America until 2004.

This style of growth continued through the 1990s, seeing Electrolux purchase scores of companies including, for a time, Husqvarna.

Hans Werthén, President and later chairman of the board, led the strategic core of an increasingly decentralized Electrolux—and was instrumental to its rapid growth.

While attempts to cut costs, centralise administration, and wring out economies of scale from Electrolux's operations were made in the 1960s and 1970s with the focus so firmly on growth, further company-wide restructuring efforts only began in the late 1990s.

2000 to present
In North America, the Electrolux name was long used by vacuum cleaner manufacturer Aerus LLC, originally established to sell Swedish Electrolux products. In 2000, Aerus transferred trademark rights back to the Electrolux Group, and ceased using the Electrolux name in 2004.

Conversely, Electrolux-made vacuums carried the Eureka brand name, which Electrolux continued to use while also selling Electrolux branded vacuums after 2000. Electrolux USA customer service maintains a database of Electrolux made vacuums and provides a link to Aerus's website for the convenience of owners of Electrolux branded Aerus vacuums.

Keith McLoughlin took over as president and CEO on January 1, 2011, and became the company's first non Swedish chief executive.

In August 2011, Electrolux acquired from Sigdo Koppers the Chilean appliance manufacturer CTI obtaining several brands with the purchase including: Fensa, Gafa, Mademsa and Somela.

On February 6, 2017, Electrolux announced that it had agreed to acquire Anova Applied Electronics, Inc., the U.S.-based provider of the Anova Precision Cooker.

On March 23, 2020, Electrolux completed the spin-off of its professional division, which the separated company incorporated as Electrolux Professional AB.

In September 2023, it was announced Electrolux has sold its refrigerator manufacturing facility in Nyíregyháza to the Malmö-headquartered heat pump systems and technology company, Qvantum for €38 million.

Notable products

 * 1919: The Lux vacuum is the first product Electrolux sells.
 * 1925: D, Electrolux's first refrigerator, is an absorption model.
 * 1937: Electrolux model 30 vacuum is unveiled.
 * 1940: Assistent (Swedish for assistant), the company's only wartime consumer product, is a mixer /food processor.
 * 1941: Charlton Automatic rifle Electrolux SMLE Model Lee–Enfield A replacement of the bren gun for the home guard soldiers, made from out-of-service Lee-Enfields. New Zealander Philip Charlton, a car mechanic, designed the gun in Australia.
 * 1951: W 20, Electrolux's first home washing machine, is manufactured in Gothenburg, Sweden.
 * 1959: D 10, the company's first dishwasher, is a counter top model nicknamed "round jar".
 * 2001: Launch of the Electrolux Trilobite, a robotic vacuum cleaner.

Brands
Electrolux sells under a wide variety of brand names worldwide. Most of them were acquired through mergers and acquisitions and only do business in a single country or geographic area. The following is an incomplete list.

Americas

 * Anova Applied Electronics, Inc., provider of the Anova Precision Cooker
 * Electrolux ICON, premium consumer appliance brand sold in the US
 * Eureka, American consumer vacuum cleaner brand, Sold to Midea, China in 2016
 * Fensa, Chilean consumer appliance brand, widely available in Latin America.
 * Frigidaire, major appliance manufacturer.
 * Gafa, Argentinean appliance manufacturer.
 * Gibson, refrigerator and air conditioning manufacturer
 * Mademsa, Chilean home appliance brand
 * Philco, former U.S. consumer electronics and appliance manufacturer for appliances, though brand name is also used separately for electronics by Philips
 * Sanitaire, commercial product division of Eureka
 * Somela, Chilean home appliance brand, available throughout Latin America
 * Tappan, former U.S. appliance manufacturer
 * Viking Range, major appliance manufacturer.
 * White-Westinghouse, former U.S. appliance manufacturer

Europe

 * Arthur Martin
 * AEG
 * Atlas (Denmark)
 * Corberó (Spain)
 * Elektro Helios, manufacturer of consumer appliances for the Swedish market
 * Faure, French consumer appliance maker
 * Lehel, consumer appliance brand sold in Hungary and elsewhere. Acquired in 1991, the brand has not been in use since 1999.
 * Marynen/Marijnen, consumer product brand sold in the Netherlands
 * Parkinson Cowan, cooking appliances (United Kingdom)
 * Progress, vacuum cleaner brand sold throughout Europe
 * REX-Electrolux, Italian appliance manufacturer
 * Rosenlew, Finnish consumer product brand sold in Nordic countries
 * Samus, Romanian producer of cooking stoves headquartered in Satu Mare
 * Voss, premium consumer cooking appliance and equipment supplier in Denmark and elsewhere
 * Zanker, consumer kitchen appliance brand sold in central Europe
 * Zanussi, Italian appliance manufacturer that became part of Electrolux in 1984
 * Zanussi Professional, professional kitchen equipment manufacturer
 * Zoppas, consumer products brand sold in Italy

Oceania

 * Dishlex, a budget friendly dishwasher brand sold in Australia (discontinued in August 2021)
 * Kelvinator, an air conditioning and fridge freezer brand sold in Australia, India and elsewhere
 * Simpson, previously sold Kitchen and laundry appliances, now they only sell laundry appliances. They are a brand sold in Australia and New Zealand. (discontinued in July 2022)
 * Westinghouse, a kitchen and laundry appliance brand in Australia licensed from Westinghouse Electric Corp to Electrolux Home Products Pty Ltd.

Middle East

 * King, Israeli kitchen appliance brand made by REX-Electrolux, an Italian Electrolux subsidiary.
 * Olympic Group, home appliance brand in Egypt

Global/other

 * Arthur Martin-Electrolux
 * Beam, Electrolux's central vacuum brand
 * Castor
 * Chef
 * Dito, professional food processing equipment
 * Electrolux Professional
 * Frigidaire, full range major appliance brand sold globally
 * Juno-Electrolux, premium consumer kitchen appliance brand
 * Molteni, professional stoves
 * Tornado, vacuum cleaners and other consumer products
 * Therma
 * Tricity Bendix
 * Volta, vacuum cleaner brand sold in Australia, Sweden and elsewhere

Note: This list does not include brands such as Kenmore, IKEA and John Lewis, which may sell Electrolux produced appliances but are not owned by or affiliated with Electrolux, as Electrolux acts as an OEM for these brands.

Slogan
The company's international slogan is "Shape living for the better". In the past it was "Thinking of you".

In the 1960s the company successfully marketed vacuums in the United Kingdom with the slogan "Nothing sucks like an Electrolux". In the United States, it was frequently assumed that using this slogan was a brand blunder. In fact, the informal American meaning of the word sucks was already well known at the time in the United Kingdom, and the company hoped the slogan, with its possible double entendre, would gain attention.

In Indonesia, the Electrolux previous slogan was "Kalau saja semua seawet Electrolux" (English: If only all are as durable as Electrolux).

title: Electrolux


text:
Counties of Iceland

Iceland was historically divided into 23 counties known as sýslur, and 23 independent towns known as kaupstaðir. Iceland is now split up between 24 sýslumenn (magistrates) that are the highest authority over the local police (except in Reykjavík where there is a special office of police commissioner) and carry out administrative functions such as declaring bankruptcy and marrying people outside of the church. The jurisdictions of these magistrates often follow the lines of the historical counties, but not always. When speaking of these new "administrative" counties, the custom is to associate them with the county seats rather than using the names of the traditional counties, even when they cover the same area.

Composition
Independent towns (kaupstaðir) were first created in the 18th century as urbanisation began in Iceland; this practice continued into the 1980s. The last town that was declared an independent town was Ólafsvík in 1983. Since then, the laws regarding municipalities have been changed in such a way that there is no longer any distinction made between urban or rural municipalities.

Historical counties
The historical counties were:

 * Árnessýsla
 * Austur-Barðastrandarsýsla
 * Austur-Húnavatnssýsla
 * Austur-Skaftafellssýsla
 * Borgarfjarðarsýsla
 * Dalasýsla
 * Eyjafjarðarsýsla
 * Gullbringusýsla
 * Kjósarsýsla
 * Mýrasýsla
 * Norður-Ísafjarðarsýsla
 * Norður-Múlasýsla
 * Norður-Þingeyjarsýsla
 * Rangárvallasýsla
 * Skagafjarðarsýsla
 * Snæfellsnes- og Hnappadalssýsla
 * Strandasýsla
 * Suður-Múlasýsla
 * Suður-Þingeyjarsýsla
 * Vestur-Barðastrandarsýsla
 * Vestur-Húnavatnssýsla
 * Vestur-Ísafjarðarsýsla
 * Vestur-Skaftafellssýsla

Independent towns
The 23 independent towns were:

 * Akranes
 * Akureyri (with Grímsey)
 * Bolungarvík
 * Dalvík
 * Eskifjörður
 * Garðabær
 * Grindavík
 * Grundarfjörður (in the past)
 * Hafnarfjörður
 * Húsavík
 * Ísafjörður
 * Keflavík
 * Kópavogur
 * Neskaupstaður
 * Njarðvík
 * Ólafsfjörður
 * Ólafsvík
 * Reykjavík
 * Sauðárkrókur
 * Selfoss
 * Seltjarnarnes
 * Seyðisfjörður
 * Siglufjörður
 * Vestmannaeyjar

title: Counties of Iceland


text:
Lysias

Lysias (Λυσίας; c. 445 – c. 380 BC) was a logographer (speech writer) in ancient Greece. He was one of the ten Attic orators included in the "Alexandrian Canon" compiled by Aristophanes of Byzantium and Aristarchus of Samothrace in the third century BC.

Life
According to Dionysius of Halicarnassus and the author of the life ascribed to Plutarch, Lysias was born in 459 BC, which would accord with a tradition that Lysias reached, or passed, the age of eighty. This date was evidently obtained by reckoning back from the foundation of Thurii (444 BC), since there was a tradition that Lysias had gone there at the age of fifteen. Modern critics, in general, place his birth later, c. 445 BC, and place the trip to Thurii around 430 BC.

Cephalus, his father, was a native of Syracuse, and on the invitation of Pericles had settled at Athens. The opening scene of Plato's Republic is set at the house of Cephalus' eldest son, Polemarchus, in Piraeus. The tone of the picture warrants the inference that the Sicilian family were well known to Plato, and that their houses must often have been hospitable to such gatherings. Further, Plato's Phaedrus opens with Phaedrus coming from conversation with Lysias at the house of Epicrates of Athens: he meets Socrates, with whom he will read and discuss the speech of Lysias he heard.

At Thurii, the colony newly planted on the Tarentine Gulf, the boy may have seen Herodotus, now a man in middle life, and a friendship may have grown up between them. There, too, Lysias is said to have commenced his studies in rhetoric—doubtless under a master of the Sicilian school possibly, as tradition said, under Tisias, the pupil of Corax, whose name is associated with the first attempt to formulate rhetoric as an art. The Athenian invasion of Sicily in 415–413 BC during the Peloponnesian War would ultimately create difficulties for Lysias's family, especially when the campaign ended in a devastating defeat for Athens. The continued attempt to link Lysias to the famous names of the era is illustrated by the ancient ascription to Lysias of a rhetorical exercise purporting to be a speech in which the captive Athenian general Nicias appealed for mercy to the Sicilians. The terrible blow to Athens quickened the energies of an anti-Athenian faction at Thurii. Lysias and his elder brother Polemarchus, with three hundred other persons, were accused of Atticizing. They were driven from Thurii and settled at Athens (412 BC).

Lysias and Polemarchus were rich men, having inherited property from their father, Cephalus; and Lysias claims that, though merely resident aliens, they discharged public services with a liberality which shamed many of those who enjoyed the franchise (Against Eratosthenes xii.20). The fact that they owned house property shows that they were classed as isoteleis (ἰσοτελεῖς), i.e. foreigners who paid only the same tax as citizens, being exempt from the special tax (μετοίκιον) on resident aliens. Polemarchus occupied a house in Athens itself, Lysias another in the Piraeus, near which was their shield factory, employing a hundred and twenty skilled slaves.

In 404 BC, the Thirty Tyrants were established at Athens under the protection of a Spartan garrison. One of their earliest measures was an attack upon the resident aliens, who were represented as disaffected to the new government. Lysias and Polemarchus were on a list of ten singled out to be the first victims. Polemarchus was arrested and compelled to drink hemlock. Lysias had a narrow escape, with the help of a large bribe. He slipped by a back-door out of the house in which he was a prisoner and took a boat to Megara. It appears that he rendered valuable services to the exiles during the reign of the tyrants, and in 403 Thrasybulus proposed that these services be recognised by the bestowal of the citizenship. The Boule, however, had not yet been reconstituted, and hence the measure could not be introduced to the ecclesia by the requisite preliminary resolution (προβούλευμα). On this ground, it was successfully opposed.

During his later years, Lysias—now probably a comparatively poor man owing to the rapacity of the tyrants and his own generosity to the Athenian exiles—appears as a hard-working member of a new profession—that of logographer, a writer of speeches to be delivered in the law courts. The thirty-four extant are but a small fraction. From 403 to about 380 BC, his industry must have been incessant. The notices of his personal life in these years are scanty. In 403 he came forward as the accuser of Eratosthenes, one of the Thirty Tyrants. This was his only direct contact with Athenian politics. The story that he wrote a defence for Socrates, which the latter declined to use, probably arose from a confusion. Several years after the death of Socrates, the sophist Polycrates composed a declamation against him, to which Lysias replied.

A more authentic tradition represents Lysias as having spoken his own Olympiacus at the Olympic festival of 388 BC, to which Dionysius I of Syracuse had sent a magnificent embassy. Tents embroidered with gold were pitched within the sacred enclosure, and the wealth of Dionysius was vividly shown by the number of chariots which he had entered. Lysias lifted up his voice to denounce Dionysius as, next to Artaxerxes, the worst enemy of Hellas, and to impress upon the assembled Greeks that one of their foremost duties was to deliver Sicily from a hateful oppression. The latest work of Lysias which can be dated (a fragment of a speech For Pherenicus) belongs to 381 or 380 BC. He probably died in or soon after 380 BC.

Style
Lysias displays literary tact, humour, and attention to character in his extant speeches, and is famous for using his skill to conceal his art. It was obviously desirable that a speech written for delivery by a client should be suitable to his age, station and circumstances. Lysias was the first to make this adaptation truly artistic. His language is crafted to flow easily, in contrast to his predecessor Antiphon's pursuit of majestic emphasis, to his pupil (and close follower in many respects) Isaeus' more conspicuous display of artistry and more strictly logical manner of argumentation, and later to the forceful oratory of Demosthenes.

Translated into terms of ancient criticism, he became the model of the plain style (ἰσχνὸς χαρακτήρ, ἰσχνὴ/λιτὴ/ἀφελὴς λέξις: genus tenue or subtile). Greek and then Roman critics distinguished three styles of rhetorical composition—the grand (or elaborate), the plain and the middle, the plain being nearest to the language of daily life. Greek rhetoric began in the grand style; then Lysias set an exquisite pattern of the plain; and Demosthenes might be considered as having effected an almost ideal compromise.

The vocabulary of Lysias is relatively simple and would later be regarded as a model of pure diction for Atticists. Most of the rhetorical figures are sparingly used—except such as consist in the parallelism or opposition of clauses. The taste of the day not yet emancipated from the influence of the Sicilian rhetoric probably demanded a large use of antithesis. Lysias excels in vivid description; he has also the knack of marking the speaker's character by light touches. The structure of his sentences varies a good deal according to the dignity of the subject. He has equal command over the periodic style (κατεστραμμένη λέξις) and the non-periodic or continuous (εἰρομένη, διαλελυμένη). His disposition of his subject-matter is always simple. The speech has usually four parts: introduction (προοίμιον), narrative of facts (διήγησις), proofs (πίστεις), which may be either external, as from witnesses, or internal, derived from argument on the facts, and, lastly, conclusion (ἐπίλογος).

It is in the introduction and the narrative that Lysias is seen at his best. In his greatest extant speech—that Against Eratosthenes—and also in the fragmentary Olympiacus, he has pathos and fire; but these were not characteristic qualities of his work. In Cicero's judgment (De Orat. iii. 7, 28) Demosthenes was peculiarly distinguished by force (vis), Aeschines by resonance (sonitus); Hypereides by acuteness (acumen); Isocrates by sweetness (suavitas); the distinction which he assigns to Lysias is subtilitas, an Attic refinement—which, as he elsewhere says (Brutus, 16, 64) is often joined to an admirable vigour (lacerti). Nor was it oratory alone to which Lysias rendered service; his work had an important effect on all subsequent Greek prose, by showing how perfect elegance could be joined to plainness. Here, in his artistic use of familiar idiom, he might fairly be called the Euripides of Attic prose. His style has attracted interest from modern readers, because it is employed in describing scenes from the everyday life of Athens.

Table of extant speeches
From Lysias we have thirty-four speeches. Three fragmentary ones have come down under the name of Lysias; one hundred and twenty-seven more, now lost, are known from smaller fragments or from titles. In the Augustan age four hundred and twenty-five works bore his name, of which more than two hundred were allowed as genuine by the critics.

The table below shows the name of the speech (in the ordered listed in the Lamb translation), the suggested date of the speech, the primary rhetorical mode, the main point of the speech, and comments. Forensic is synonymous with judicial and denotes speeches made in law courts. Epideictic is ceremonial and involves the praise or, less often, the criticism, of the subject. Deliberative denotes speeches made in legislatures. Notes (e.g., A1, B3, etc.) refer to the list of qualifications below the table.

NOTES "A": FORENSIC, RELATING TO PUBLIC CASES
 * 1) Relating to Offences directly against the State (γραφαὶ δημοσίων ἀδικημάτων); such as treason, malversation in office, embezzlement of public moneys.
 * 2) Cases relating to Unconstitutional Procedure (γραφὴ παρανόμων)
 * 3) Cases relating to *Claims for Money withheld from the State (ἀπογραφαί).
 * 4) Cases relating to a Scrutiny (δοκιμασία); especially the Scrutiny, by the Senate, of Officials Designate
 * 5) Cases relating to Military Offences (γραφαὶ λιποταξίου, ἀστρατείας)
 * 6) Cases relating to Murder or Intent to Murder (γραφαὶ φόνου, τραύματος ἐκ προνοίας)
 * 7) Cases relating to Impiety (γραφαὶ ἀσεβείας)

NOTES "B": FORENSIC, RELATING TO PRIVATE CASES
 * 1) Action for Libel (δίκη κακηγορίας)
 * 2) Action by a Ward against a Guardian (δίκη ἐπιτροπῆς)
 * 3) Trial of a Claim to Property (διαδικασία)
 * 4) Answer to a Special Plea (πρὸς παραγραφήν)

Miscellaneous
To his Companions, a Complaint of Slanders, viii. (certainly spurious).

The speech attributed to Lysias in Plato's Phaedrus 230e–234. This speech has generally been regarded as Plato's own work; but the certainty of this conclusion will be doubted by those who observe: If the satirist were merely analysing his own composition, such criticism would have little point. Lysias is the earliest writer who is known to have composed erōtikoi; it is as representing both rhetoric and a false erōs that he is the object of attack in the Phaedrus. Stylistic differences between the speech and the rest of the Phaedrus have also been taken to suggest that the speech was genuine.
 * the elaborate preparations made in the dialogue for a recital of the erōtikos which shall be verbally exact,
 * the closeness of the criticism made upon it.

Fragments
Three hundred and fifty-five of these are collected by Hermann Sauppe, Oratores Attici, ii. 170–216. Two hundred and fifty-two of them represent one hundred and twenty-seven speeches of known title; and of six the fragments are comparatively large. Of these, the fragmentary speech For Pherenicus belongs to 381 or 380 BC, and is thus the latest known work of Lysias. In literary and historical interest, the first place among the extant speeches of Lysias belongs to that Against Eratosthenes (403 BC), one of the Thirty Tyrants, whom Lysias arraigns as the murderer of his brother Polemarchus. The speech is an eloquent and vivid picture of the reign of terror which the Thirty established at Athens; the concluding appeal, to both parties among the citizens, is specially powerful.

Next in importance is the speech Against Agoratus (388 BC), one of our chief authorities for the internal history of Athens during the months which immediately followed the defeat at Aegospotami. The Olympiacus (388 BC) is a brilliant fragment, expressing the spirit of the festival at Olympia, and exhorting Greeks to unite against their common foes. The Plea for the Constitution (403 BC) is interesting for the manner in which it argues that the well-being of Athens—now stripped of empire—is bound up with the maintenance of democratic principles. The speech For Mantitheus (392 BC) is a graceful and animated portrait, of a young Athenian hippeus, making a spirited defence of his honor against the charge of disloyalty. The defence For the Invalid is a humorous character-sketch. The speech Against Pancleon illustrates the intimate relations between Athens and Plataea, while it gives us some picturesque glimpses of Athenian town life. The defence of the person who had, been charged with destroying a mona, or sacred olive, places us amidst the country life of Attica. And the speech Against Theomnestus deserves attention for its curious evidence of the way in which the ordinary vocabulary of Athens had changed between 600 and 400 BC.

title: Lysias


text:
User talk:Alexander.stohr

Welcome
Hello, welcome to Wikipedia.

You might find these links helpful in creating new pages or helping with the above tasks: How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Naming conventions, Manual of Style. You should read our policies at some point too.

If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

 * If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.

 * You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: . If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.

 * If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.

 * Before saving a page, it's a good idea to use the Show Preview button to review your edits.

Again, welcome! - UtherSRG 14:15, 28 Feb 2004 (UTC)

I am from http://de.wikipedia.org - my english is good enough for a few cross tasks but i dont think that i will contribute a lot in your scope of the project. have fun. -- Alexander.stohr 03:54, 29 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Diamond Yukai
Another editor has added the "prod" template to the article Diamond Yukai, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 01:29, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

E-mail
Sorry, not interested and likely not really qualified. Thank you, Vsmith (talk) 02:32, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * thanks for the quick response. i just put a "fortune" on it, so by principle i have no reason for a complaint at all. -Alexander.stohr (talk) 13:00, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Alexander.stohr! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:21, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Jerome Hauer -

2-byte longs in Visual C++?
I realize you were merely rearranging information when you made this edit, but do you have any information to support the claim that the "16 bit version of Visual C++" ever used 2-byte longs? I really can't believe this. I've started a discussion here. —Steve Summit (talk) 13:40, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Article on Idee fixe
Your edit on monomania suggests you might have an interest in the new article Idée fixe. Hope you take a look. Brews ohare (talk) 16:56, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Alba Arnova

The article Alba Arnova has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Regards, SunCreator (talk) 22:31, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Anat
Hello.

I'm curious, what is your basis for this edit, ? SamEV (talk) 04:32, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

 * Its the substantial, phonetic, regional and timely relative closeness of the terms - that when you doing research on it have some likeliness of getting intermixed. As wikipedia spent a separate article for each it might be worth a note to help people find those articles rather than letting them stumble in and edit the existing article by adding a "second meaning" of the word. --Alexander.stohr (talk) 13:50, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

 * Thank you for responding.
 * The "See also" section is for links to articles that are directly relevant to the subject. If ambiguity is an issue, the way to address that is by adding a hatnote such as Template:Distinguish (it goes at the top of the article). However, I doubt very much that there's ambiguity in this case.
 * Cheers. SamEV (talk) 07:52, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Surakarta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bengawan Solo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited MeeGo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mer. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

January 2017
Hello, I'm Doug Weller. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Jean Pierre-Houdin, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 09:45, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
 * For now it looks like the article is completely gone. --Alexander.stohr (talk) 13:04, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kelly Gordon
Hello Alexander.stohr,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Kelly Gordon for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Akhiljaxxn (talk) 12:32, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Kelly Gordon moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Kelly Gordon, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. L293D (☎ • ✎) 14:42, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kelly Gordon has been accepted
 Kelly Gordon, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! L293D (☎ • ✎) 03:07, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Kelly_Gordon help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

African Chair moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, African Chair, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. noq (talk) 21:04, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:African Chair

Hello, Alexander.stohr. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "African Chair".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. TheTrainNoch (talk) 03:31, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Michael Heinrich Horn moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Michael Heinrich Horn, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jalen Folf  (talk)  03:08, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Michael Horn (media creator)

A tag has been placed on Michael Horn (media creator) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Mcampany (talk) 05:51, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Logo for ROS 2 release "dashing diademata".png
Thank you for uploading File:Logo for ROS 2 release &. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Also:
 * File:Logo for ROS 2 release "eloquent elusor".png

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Michael Heinrich Horn

Hello, Alexander.stohr. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Michael Heinrich Horn".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:41, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Lovelace (microarchitecture) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Lovelace (microarchitecture), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 22:06, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of JURIX

A tag has been placed on JURIX requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Interesting Geek (talk) 01:23, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lovelace (microarchitecture) (March 15)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Slywriter was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lovelace (microarchitecture) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lovelace (microarchitecture), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Lovelace_(microarchitecture) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Slywriter&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Lovelace_(microarchitecture) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Slywriter (talk) 15:51, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nvidia DGX, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page A100. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Nvidia Grace moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Nvidia Grace, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Lopifalko (talk) 06:51, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Lovelace (microarchitecture)
Hello, Alexander.stohr. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lovelace (microarchitecture), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Lovelace (microarchitecture)

Hello, Alexander.stohr. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lovelace".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:32, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Nvidia Grace

Hello, Alexander.stohr. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nvidia Grace".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗ plicit  23:55, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cache coherent interconnect for accelerators

The article Cache coherent interconnect for accelerators has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: "Non-notable tech product. No independent sigcov provided to establish notability."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jdcooper (talk) 04:43, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

title: User talk:Alexander.stohr